Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/08/2016 PC AgendaP'LANNING ' FILE COPY COMMISSION AGENDA March 8, 201f 7:00 P.M. City Hall, Windmill Community Room 21810 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 .r r` Barlas Frank Farago Jen "'Fred" Mahike Ken Mok Raymond Wolfe Copies of staff reports or other written documentation relating to agenda items are on file in the Planning Division of the Community Development Department, located at 21810 Copley Drive, and are available for public inspection. If you have questions regarding an agenda item, please call (909) 839-7030 during regular business hours. Written materials distributed to the Planning Commission within 72 hours of the Planning Commission meeting are available for public inspection immediately upon distribution in the City Clerk's office at 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California, during normal business hours. In an effort to comply with the requirements of Title // of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the City of Diamond Bar requires that any person in need of any type of special equipment, assistance or accommodation(s) in order to communicate at a City public meeting must inform the Community Development Department at (909) 839-7030 a minimum of 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting. II 10ND, Please refrain from smoking, eating or I /IV UILY UI UIC1111U11U WCU UOC70 1UUYWuu drinking in the Windmill Community Room paper and encourages you to do the same City of Diamond Bar Planning Commission The meetings of the Diamond Bar Planning Commission are open to the public. A member of the public may address the Commission on the subject of one or more agenda items and/or other items of which are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Diamond Bar Planning Commission. A request to address the Commission should be submitted in writing at the public hearing, to the Secretary of the Commission. As a general rule, the opportunity for public comments will take place at the discretion of the Chair. However, in order to facilitate the meeting, persons who are interested parties for an item may be requested to give their presentation at the time the item is called on the calendar. The Chair may limit individual public input to five minutes on any item; or the Chair may limit the total amount of time allocated for public testimony based on the number of people requesting to speak and the business of the Commission. Individuals are requested to conduct themselves in a professional and businesslike manner. Comments and questions are welcome so that all points of view are considered prior to the Commission making recommendations to the staff and City Council. In accordance with State Law (Brown Act), all matters to be acted on by the Commission must be posted at least 72 hours prior to the Commission meeting. In case of emergency or when a subject matter arises subsequent to the posting of the agenda, upon making certain findings, the Commission may act on item that is not on the posted agenda. INFORMATION RELATING TO AGENDAS AND ACTIONS OF THE COMMISSION Agendas for Diamond Bar Planning Commission meetings are prepared by the Planning Division of the Community Development Department. Agendas are available 72 hours prior to the meeting at City Hall and the public library, and may be accessed by personal computer at the contact information below. Every meeting of the Planning Commission is recorded and duplicate recordings are available for a nominal charge. ADA REQUIREMENTS A cordless microphone is available for those persons with mobility impairments who cannot access the public speaking area. The service of the cordless microphone and sign language interpreter services are available by giving notice at least three business days in advance of the meeting. Please telephone (909) 839-7030 between 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m., Monday through Thursday, and 7:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Friday. HELPFUL CONTACT INFORMATION Copies of Agenda, Rules of the Commission, CDs of Meetings (909) 839-7030 Email: info(a-)-diamondbarca.gov Website: www.diamondbarca.gov CITY OF DIAMOND BAR PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, March 8, 2016 FTITC_1. � .. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Next Resolution No. 2016-07 1. ADMINISTRATION OF OATH OF OFFICE FOR PLANNING COMMISSIONERS - ADMINISTERED BY TOMMYE CRIBBINS, CITY CLERK 2. ROLL CALL: COMMISSIONERS: Naila Barlas, Frank Farago, Jen "Fred" Mahlke, Ken Mok, Raymond Wolfe 3. REORGANIZATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION: Selection of Chairperson and Vice Chairperson. 4. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is the time and place for the general public to address the members of the Planning Commission on any item that is within their jurisdiction, allowing the public an opportunity to speak on non-public hearing and non -agenda items. Please complete a Speaker's Card for the recording Secretary (completion of this form is voluntary). There is a five-minute maximum time limit when addressing the Planning Commission. 5. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Chairperson 6. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following items listed on the consent calendar are considered routine and are approved by a single motion. Consent calendar items may be removed from the agenda by request of the Commission only: 6.1 Minutes of Regular Meeting: 7. OLD BUSINESS: None 8. NEW BUSINESS: None 9. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: February 23, 2016 9.1 Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL2015-242 — Under the authority of Diamond Bar Municipal Code Sections 22.48 and 22.56, the applicant/property owner is requesting Development Review approval to construct a two-story addition consisting of 2,091 square feet of floor area to an existing 1,904 square -foot, one-story single-family residence with an attached 696 square -foot, three -car garage on a 0.27 gross acre (11,730 gross square- MARCH 8, 2016 im PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA foot) lot. A Minor Conditional Use Permit is requested to allow a second -story addition to an existing nonconforming structure with a 16' 11" rear setback (where 20 feet is required). The subject property is zoned Low Density Residential (RL) with a consistent underlying General Plan land use designation of Low Density Residential. (Continued from October 13, 2015) Project Address: 1606 Ano Nuevo Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Property Owner/ Beatriz Flores Applicant: 1606 Ano Nuevo Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Environmental Determination: The project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on that assessment, the City has determined the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to Article 19 under Section 15301(e) (additions to existing structures) of the CEQA Guidelines. No further environmental review is required. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL2015-242, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the draft resolution. PUBLIC HEARING(S): 10.1 Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL2015-498 — Under the authority of Diamond Bar Municipal Code Sections 22.48, 22.56 and 22.68, the applicant/property owner is requesting Development Review approval to construct a 1,425 square -foot single -story addition to an existing 1,288 square - foot, one-story single-family residence with an attached 348 square -foot garage on 0.18 gross acre (7,820 gross square -foot) lot. A Minor Conditional Use Permit is requested to allow an addition over 50 percent of the existing square -footage to an existing nonconforming structure with a side back of 8' 2" to the west (where 10 feet is required). The subject property is zoned Low Medium Density Residential (RLM) with a consistent underlying General Plan land use designation of Low Medium Density Residnetial. Project Address: 21618 Lost River Dr. Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Property Owner/ Wei Chan Hwang and Jennifer Nguyen Applicant: 21618 Lost River Dr. Diamond Bar, CA 91765 MARCH 8, 2016 PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA. Environmental Determination: The project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on that assessment, the City has determined the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to Article 19 under Section 15301(e) (additions to existing structures) of the CEQA Guidelines. No further environmental review is required. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL2015-498, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the draft resolution. 10.2 Development Review No. PL2015-101 — Under the authority of Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.48, the property owner and applicant are requesting Development Review approval to construct a new 6,269 square -foot, multi-level, single-family residence with an attached 819 square -foot, 3 -car garage on a 50,094 gross square -foot (1.15 gross acres) lot. The subject property is zoned Rural Residential (RR) with a consistent underlying General Plan land use designation of Rural Residential (RR). Project Address: 2651 Braided Mane Dr. Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Property Owner: Harry Ou 13768 Rosewall Ave. Chino, CA 91710 Applicant: Jay S. Crawford 470 Wald Irvine, CA 92618 Environmental Determination: The project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on that assessment, the City has determined the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to Article 19 under Section 15303(a) (new construction of a single-family residence) of the CEQA Guidelines. No further environmental review is required. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review No. PL2015-101, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the draft resolution. 11. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS/ INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 12. 13. STAFF COMMENTS I INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 12.1 Public Hearing dates for future projects SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING: CITY COUNCIL MEETING: PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING: EASTER EGG HUNT: ANNUAL STATE OF THE CITY ADDRESS: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: 13. ADJOURNMENT: lXk ky Wel 0 [9� Rm [*I10 1 Thursday, March 10, 2016 Diamond Bar City Hall Windmill Community Room 21810 Copley Drive Tuesday, March 22, 2016 — 6:30 p.m. South Coast Air Quality Management District Auditorium, 21825 Copley Drive Thursday, March 24, 2016 Diamond Bar City Hall Windmill Community Room 21810 Copley Drive Saturday, March 26, 2016 Pantera Park 738 Pantera Drive Lions Club Pancake Breakfast— 8:30 a.m. Easter Bunny Photos — 8:30 a.m. Egg Hunt — 10:00 a.m. Wednesday, March 30, 2016 — 6:00 p.m. Diamond Bar Center, Grand Ballroom 1600 Grand Ave. Tuesday, April 12, 2016 Diamond Bar City Hall Windmill Community Room 21810 Copley Drive Friday, April 24, 2016 — 9:15 a.m. Pantera Elementary School Pantera Drive MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BARq;j MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION! -7 -- FEBRUARY 23, 2016 Vice Chair Mahlke called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Windmill Room, 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Vice Chair Mahlke led the Pledge of Allegiance. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Frank Farago, Raymond Wolfe, Vice Chair Jennifer "Fred" Mahlke Absent: Commissioner Bob Nishimura Also present: Greg Gubman, Community Development Director; James Eggart, Assistant City Attorney; Grace Lee, Senior Planner; Natalie T. Espinoza, Assistant Planner; and Stella Marquez, Administrative Coordinator. 2. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: None 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: As presented 4. CONSENT CALENDAR: 4.1 Minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 26, 2016. C/Wolfe moved, C/Farago seconded, to approve the Minutes of the January 26, 2016, Meeting as presented. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: 5. OLD BUSINESS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: None 6. NEW BUSINESS: None Farago, Wolfe, VC/Mahlke None Nishimura 7. PUBLIC HEARING(S): PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION 7.1 Conditional Use Permit No. PL2015-427 - Under the authority of Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Sections 22.58 and 22.30.050, the applicant and property owner requested a Conditional Use Permit to operate a 6,352 square foot postsecondary school within a 70,757 square foot multi -tenant commercial center. A Parking Permit was requested for a reduction in the required number of parking spaces. The subject property is zoned Community Commercial (C-2) with an underlying General Plan land use designation of Professional Office (OP) PROJECT ADDRESS APPLICANT: 2040 Brea Canyon Road #100 Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Plaza Diamond Bar Partners Holding LLC 3029 Wilshire Boulevard #202 Santa Monica, CA 90403 Nobel University 505 Shatto Place #300 Los Angeles, CA 90026 AP/Espinoza presented staff's report and recommended Planning Commission approval of Development Review No. PL2015-427, based on the Findings of Fact and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the Resolution. VC/Mahlke opened the public hearing. With no one present who wished to speak on this item, VC/Mahlke closed the public hearing. VC/Mahlke asked if the accommodations utilizing the ITE rates had been made elsewhere in Diamond Bar and CDD/Gubman responded that he did not recall using the ITE methodology for other parking permits in the city but it is a generally accepted methodology and the Trip Generation Manual is an industrywide reference tool. More frequently, parking demand analyses for discretionary projects have used what is called the ULI Shared Parking methodology which is a different approach but basically looks at the fluctuations and peak demands and finds where the worst-case scenario/highest parking demand is. Both methodologies are reasonable ;T W ff-i' rr-,N A -k r7 PLANNING COMMISSION and based on past practice and sample data from observations of parking and trip generation. C/Farago asked why the parking study analysis uses 17 parking spaces if there are concurrent classes. AP/Espinoza explained that 17 spaces are used in the parking study analysis because most of the businesses in the center are open during the day before 6:30 p.m. when there is only one class in session at a time and the two concurrent classes are in session in the evening when most of the other businesses are closed. C/Wolfe moved, C/Farago seconded, to approve Conditional Use Permit No. PL2015-427, based on the Findings of Fact and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the Resolution. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Farago, Wolfe, VC/Mahlke NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Nishimura 8. PLANNING COMMISSIONER COMMENTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: C/Wolfe welcomed Ken Mok to the Planning Commission. Ken spent about 10 years on the Traffic and Transportation Commission and is well -versed in all matters similar to what the Planning Commission deals with. VC/Mahlke said she was excited to learn that Ken would be serving on the Commission. She worked with Ken on the Traffic and Transportation Commission and he helped VC/Mahlke gain her footing as a newcomer to that Commission. 9. STAFF COMMENTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 9.1 Public Hearing dates for future projects. CDID/Gubman reported that the next Planning Commission meeting is scheduled for March 8 and two new Planning Commissioners will be coming on board at that time, Ken Mok and Naila Barlas. Naila Barlas is new to the Commissions and because the Traffic and Transportation Commission has been an excellent springboard to the Planning Commission, staff looks forward to welcoming Ken Mok. Also on March 8, the Planning Commission will formally reorganize during which a Chairperson and Vice Chairperson will be appointed for the coming year. rf-N a a `��A FEBRUARY 23, 2016 PAGE 4 kPLANNING COMMISSION There are three hearing items scheduled for March 8. There will be the continued review of a residential addition at 1606 Ana Nuevo which was continued due to concerns about the scale and incompatibility with the scale of the neighborhood; a proposed addition at 21618 Lost River; and a new single family residence at 2651 Braided Main within the Diamond Bar Country Estates. The March 22 Planning Commission meeting will be canceled to allow the City Council to hold its special scheduled meeting and the Planning Commission meeting schedule will be resumed on April 12. C/Wolfe stated that for the April 12 meeting he will be in Washington D.C. 11. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: As listed in tonight's agenda. ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Planning Commission, VC/Mahlke adjourned the regular meeting at 7:17 p.m. The foregoing minutes are hereby approved this 8th day of March, 2016. Attest: Respectfully Submitted, Greg Gubman Community Development Director UTAI 1 W 4 : Lei :I a I CITY OF DIAMOND BAR - 21810 COPLEY DRIVE - DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 - TEL. (909) 839-7030 - FAX (909) 861-3117 RAW= ,110i MEETING DATE: March 8, 2016.(Continued from October 13, 2015) CASE/FILE NUMBER: Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL2015-242 PROJECT LOCATION: 1606 Ano Nuevo Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 (APN 8293-022-014) GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential (RL) ZONING DISTRICT: Low Density Residential (RL) PROPERTY OWNER Beatriz Flores APPLICANT: 1606 Ano Nuevo Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 The applicant is requesting approval of a Development Review (DR) application to construct a two -.story addition consisting of 2,091 (previously 2,382) square feet of floor area to an existing 1,904 square -foot, one-story single-family residence with an attached 696 square -foot three - car garage on a 0.27 gross acre (11,730 square -foot) lot. A Minor Conditional Use Permit (MCUP) is requested to allow a two-story addition to an existing nonconforming structure with a 16'-11" rear setback (where 20 feet is required). Adopt the attached Resolution (Attachment 1) approving Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL2015-242, based on the findings of Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Sections 22.48 and 22.56, subject to conditions. On October 13, 2015, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing, solicited testimony from all interested individuals, and continued the hearing to a future date. Neighboring residents voiced objections to the size, mass, and scale of the home. The Commission directed the Applicant to reduce the floor area, mass, and scale of the proposed addition to be more compatible with the characteristics of existing homes in the neighborhood. The Applicant resubmitted the project with a 291 square -foot reduction in floor area from the previous request and reduced the mass and scale of the home, as seen from the street. The project site is located on the east side of Ano Nuevo Drive, at the end of the cul-de-sac, north of the intersection with Acacia Hill Road. The property was developed in 1970 under Los Angeles County standards with a 1,904 square -foot, one-story single-family residence with a 696 square -foot garage on a 0.27 gross acre (11,730 square -foot) lot. There are no protected trees on site. The existing house is situated toward the front of the lot, approximately 20 feet from the front property line. The property is legally described as Lot 144 of Tract No. 27979, and the Assessor's Parcel Number (APN) is 8293-022-014. Site and Surrounding General Plan, Zoning and Land Uses The following table describes the surrounding land uses located adjacent to the subject property: Site Aerial Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL 2015-242 Page 2 of 12 Northwest Project Site Southeast Panoramic Street View of Project Site (Note: the appearance of street curvature is due to the project site fronting along the end of a cul-de-sac street) Project Description The proposed second -story addition consists of the following components: First Level Existing Proposed Total Living Area 1,904 s.f. 301 s.f. 2,205s.f. Garage Area 696 s.f. 13 s.f. 709 s.f. Front Porch Area 99 s.f. -40 s.f. 59 s.f. Rear Covered Patio Area 417 s.f. 0 s.f. 417 s.f. Storage Area 50 s.f. 55 s.f. 105 s.f. Total First Level Area Second Level 3,495 s.f. Living Area 0 s.f. 1,790 s.f. 1,790 s.f. Total Second Level Area ',790 s.f. TOTAL LIVING AREA 1904 s.f. 2,091 s.f. 3,996 s.f. Total Garage Area 696 s.f. 13 s.f. 709 s.f. Total Porch/Patio Area 516 s.f. -40 s.f. 476 s.f. Total Storage Area TOTAL FLOOR ZEN 50 s.f. 55 s.f. 106 s.f. 5,285s.if The existing one-story home consists of common areas (living room, dining room, family room, and kitchen), and private areas consisting of four bedrooms and three bathrooms. The bedroom area of the first floor plan will be modified to convert the existing master bedroom at the rear of the house to a master suite, including an expanded master bath and new walk-in closet. The three bedrooms towards the front of the house will be modified to accommodate a guest bedroom and a den/sifting room, a bathroom, and stairway leading to the new second Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL 2015-242 Page 3 of 12 floor. The proposed second floor includes a new second master suite, with master bath and walk-in closets, and two additional bedrooms with walk-in closets and access to a shared bathroom. The second floor also includes a bonus room and office room—which may be used as a bedroom—and ancillary storage areas. The second floor addition is set back 3'-101" from the front of the house—with an architectural projection 2'-0" from the front of the house—and located predominantly above the existing and proposed first floor area. The height of the existing house is approximately 17'-6" and the height of the proposed addition is approximately 23'-5", measured from the finished grade to the highest point of the roofline. The existing residence has a nonconforming rear setback of 16'-11" (where 20 feet is required). By definition, the residence is considered a "nonconforming structure" (DBMC Section 22.68.030). Approval of a Minor Conditional Use Permit is required to allow an expansion of a nonconforming structure if the expansion is not limited to the ground floor. The architecture of the existing residence is a 1970s tract home. The applicant is proposing to change the architectural style of the home to Mediterranean. As mentioned, the Applicant reduced the size of the addition by -291 square feet, almost entirely on the second floor, and reduced the mass and scale of the home as seen from the street. Comparisons between the previously -and currently proposed designs are shown below. The massing studies and before/after floor plans on the following pages further illustrate how the overall bulk and scale of the proposed second story have been reduced. Previously Proposed West (Front) Elevation Currently Proposed West (Front) Elevation Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL 2015-242 Page 4 of 12 17i too ------- -------- hall A 4;! _i °� J 3 cot gotago Indicates Reduction in bat'4 Sq. Ft. and/or Massing ------------ L— — ------ Proposed First Floor Plan =01 Reconfigured First Floor bath2 a bqqrjvss lopenjo- - , [ LLL Indicates Relocation of Sq. Ft. and/or Massing /b�ld 4 1,; - ----- %I Indicates Reduction in Sq. Ft. and/or Massing gr - Reconfigured Second Floor Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL 2015-242 Page 5 of 12 Massing Study (Looking North) ----- ----- 77- Massing Study (Looking West) Planning Commission Meeting on October 13, 2015 The following are comments/questions posed by the Commission and members of the public and how the Applicant has addressed the concerns: View from the bedroom on the second floor facing the southeast neighbor appears to be infringing on their privagy in the rear yard. Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL 2015-242 Page 6 of 12 Bedroom #4 (on the revised plan) has been relocated towards the front of the home and. contains two —1'-6" wide windows (previously one — 4'-0" window). Additionally, all windows on the second floor facing the adjacent property to the southeast are a maximum of two feet wide. Further, the second -story wall is now set back from the first floor by 11,4", compared to 2'-4" previously. Therefore, the second floor addition is considerably less intrusive than it was in the prior design. Due to previous perceived illegal activities on the property, a speaker asked if a deed restriction will be placed on the property. As conditioned, prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant is required to provide a recorded covenant and agreement which forbids the rental of rooms or other portions of the property under two or more separate agreements and' prohibits use of the property as a boarding or rooming house. However, the City is preempted from prohibiting the homeowner from hosting bible studies or other informal gatherings. The proposed floor plan is comprised of rooms and spaces commonly associated with single-family homes, so, using the rule of reason, there is no basis to suspect that the home will be converted to a "church." ® Available on -street parking that may be reduced as a result of the proposed addition. The proposed project exceeds the minimum off-street parking requirements by providing a three -car garage. Additionally, as shown on the site plan, three additional cars may be accommodated on the driveway of the subject property. It is true, however, that on -street parking at the north end of Ano Nuevo is severely restricted, and large gatherings would continue to compel guests to park on Acacia Hill, or farther south along Ano Nuevo. a Concerns about the mass and scale at the front of the house. The project has been redesigned to be less intrusive to the neighboring homes by reducing the proposed floor area, relocating proposed floor area to the rear of the home, and significantly recessing the second floor from the first floor on all sides of the home that are visible from the street. 0 Review Authority (DBIVIC Sections 22.48 and 22.56) The proposed project requires two separate, but interrelated, land use approvals: Development Review (DR) and a Minor Conditional Use Permit (MCUP). The analysis that follows provides the basis for staff's recommendation to approve the DR and MCUP applications. Development Review (DBIVIC Chapter 22.48) Additions that substantially change the appearance of an existing residence require Planning Commission approval of a DR application. Development Review approval is required to ensure compliance with the City's General Plan policies, development standards, and design Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL 2015-242 Page 7 of 12 guidelines, and to minimize adverse effects of the proposed project upon the surrounding properties and the City in general. As stated in Section 22.48.010 of the Development Code, the Development Review process was established to ensure that new development and additions to existing development are consistent with the General Plan "through the promotion of high functional and aesthetic standards to complement and add to the economic, physical, and social character" of Diamond Bar. Development Standards: The following table compares the proposed project with the City's development standards for residential development in the RL zone: ``y.4.�i�? .-�..�'Y"x`�`aa ��'�++•� ''' h �.,..�'..�' :` q � i S s �F .�� ""1�+�,I �-6'�"�y,y ' '�ss�T` 'zk}`-z.`4""� �-`1�'k' L't� �r'-� ��'ks"e"v�`,2"Xlir i�"^s'z "�9'•,V DeyeI rne:nt, � Existing , Proposed k , - • - 5'-0" on one side and Side Setbacks= side side 10'-0" on the other side 10'— southeast 10' — southeast u • — side ' s { Yard northwestx IIII n#rthwast Side M ni rnurn ��B`etweeriAdj`oIin ng= - - • - • - _ '� • southeast Struc�tures�� � .- .- �`-���Rear,kSfetback`�� . � -- �u - ' - � II • "Lot�Cou`era`Je w,.Maximum of 4� uildmg_F eight g'� 061 _, 3 -car qaraqe *Minor Conditional Use Permit is requested to allow the continuation of a nonconforming structure because the addition is not limited to the ground floor. See MCUP discussion on page 6. Site and Grading Configuration: The property is an irregular shaped lot. The existing house is situated on a level pad at the front of the property. The rear portion of the property contains a descending slope. The second story addition will be predominantly added above the existing and proposed first floor area of the residence. As such, minimal grading is required to accommodate footings and foundation of the new addition. Architectural Features, Colors, and Materials: The architecture of the existing residence is a 1970s tract design with textured stucco on exterior walls, and a gable roof with composite shingles. The proposed design will be modified to a Mediterranean style of architecture, incorporating consistent fenestration patterns and matching exterior colors and building materials. The roof of the proposed addition will be modified to a hip and valley roof with a 3.75:12 pitch. The project incorporates the principles of the City's Residential Design Guidelines as follows: A gradual transition between the project and adjacent uses is achieved through appropriate setbacks, building height, landscaping, and window and door placement; ® Elevations are treated with detailed architectural elements; Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL 2015-242 Page 8 of 12 Roof lines are representative of the design and scale of the structure through vertical and horizontal articulations; Placement and relationship of windows, doors, and other window openings are carefully integrated with the building's overall design; Proper screening for ground and roof -mounted equipment is architecturally compatible with the dwelling in terms of materials, color, shape, and size and blends in with the proposed building design; The addition is visually integrated with the primary structure, by utilizing similar colors and materials throughout the proposed addition; and ® Large wall expanses without windows or doors are avoided. Landscaping: Landscape plans are not required because the site is already developed, and because the project is exempt from the City's Water Conservation Landscaping Ordinance. The ordinance would only apply if 2,500 square feet or more of the existing landscaped area was being altered. However, landscaping that is damaged during construction will need to be restored upon project completion. This requirement is included as a condition of approval. Minor Conditional Use Permit (DIBIVIC Chapter 22.56) An IVICUP is required if a change or expansion of a nonconforming structure is greater than 50 percent of the existing square.footage of all structures on site, or if the addition is not limited to the ground floor. Current development standards require a minimum setback of 20 feet from the rear property line. The existing residence has a nonconforming rear setback of 16-11 The City recognizes that homeowners should be allowed to make appropriate improvements to their properties, even if the existing improvements do not fully conform to current development standards. Therefore, the City has established the IVICUP process for such additions, subject to the findings set forth in the Development Code. IVICUPs are normally subject to approval of the City's Hearing Officer (typically the Community Development Director). However, because this IVICLIP is being reviewed as part of a DR application, both land use entitlements are subject to review and approval of the Planning Commission. Staff believes that approving the IVICUP as described above is appropriate and compatible with other residences in the neighborhood, based on the following facts and observations: The existing dwelling was built in 1970, prior to the incorporation of the City of Diamond Bar; The proposed addition will not further encroach into the existing nonconforming rear setback of 16'-11" to the rear property line; and Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL 2015-242 Page 9 of 12 Neighboring properties have nonconforming setbacks, so the proposed project will remain consistent with other homes within the neighborhood. Compatibility with Neighborhood The proposed project complies with the goals and objectives as set forth in the adopted General Plan in terms of land use and density, as well as City's development standards and Residential Design Guidelines. The existing neighborhood was developed between 1968 and 1979 and complies with Los Angeles County development standards that governed the area prior to incorporation. The existing size of homes within a 500 -foot radius of the subject property range from 1,433 to 3,090 sq. ft., and the average size is 2,141 sq. ft. (See Attachment 3). The proposed house is still vastly larger than, any other house in the neighborhood. However, the proposed project has been redesigned to harmonize with the neighborhood as explained under the topic areas that follow: Scale and Massing: Although the home is approximately 1,854 square feet larger than the average size of homes in the neighborhood, the proposed home appears to be similar in size from the street since the proposed second floor area is significantly set back from the first floor side elevations. The massing of the building is softened by creating articulation of the front fagade by recessing the second -story addition approximately T -O" from the garage on the first floor with an architectural projection above the entrance recessed 2'-0" from the front of the house. In addition, the placement of windows breaks up the massing of the house through articulation- of exterior wall surfaces, which results in a less massive building form. It is staff's opinion that due to the manner in which the square footage of the second floor addition is distributed, the home will not overwhelm the streetscape and the surroundings from a human scale. The new Mediterranean design and associated design elements and details will, in staff's opinion, be a significant enhancement to the existing home's architectural presence. In sum, the addition will be visually integrated into the existing home and not negatively impact the look and character of the neighborhood. Privacy and Sensitivity to Adjacent Neighbors: A portion of the proposed second floor addition over a portion of the existing attached patio cover will have views towards the rear of the .property and will not readily impose a line of sight that does not already exist from the ground level of the rear yard of the subject property to the abutting property along the rear property line due to the distance and location of the proposed second floor area relative to that parcel. Existing tall shrubs located along the northwest property line are capable of growing to a maintainable height to minimize the views to/from the adjacent property to the northwest. A condition of approval is included in the attached resolution requiring maintenance of these shrubs, and the planting of additional shrubs of the same species along a portion of the rear property line to act as a hedge and maintain privacy among adjacent properties. Architectural Compatibility: The project is designed to be architecturally compatible with the recently built homes in the neighborhood, incorporating similar hipped roof, concrete roof tiles, stucco, and metal railings. Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL 2015-242 Page 10 of 12 View to Neighbor Showing Tall Shrubs that Provide Privacy Along Northwest Side Property Line View of Rear Fence View from Rear Property Line Looking Downslope to Adjacent Neighbor To East (1614 Acacia Hill Road) Based on these observations, staff does not find privacy loss to be a project impact to the neighboring properties. The Public Works Department and Building and Safety Division reviewed this project, and their comments are included in the attached resolution as conditions of approval. Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL 2015-242 Page 11 of 12 On February 25, 2016, public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 1,000 -foot radius of the project site. On February 26, 2016, the notice was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers. A notice display board was posted at the site, and a copy of the notice was posted at the City's three designated community posting sites. Public Comments Received At the previous Planning Commission hearing, neighboring residents voiced their concerns about the size, mass, and scale of the home, among other issues such as potential reduced street parking availability. However, no comments have been received as of the publication date of this report. This project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on that assessment, the City has determined the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to the provisions of Article 19 Section 15301(e) (additions to existing structures). of the CEQA Guidelines. No further environmental review is required. Prepared by: Josue Espino Planning Consultant Attachments: Reviewed by: GrAS- . L'5-e� Senior Planner 1. Draft Resolution No. 2016 -XX and Standard Conditions of Approval 2. Planning Commission Minutes dated, October 13, 2015 3. Statistical Summary of Houses Within 500' of the Subject Property 4. Plans Reviewed by the Planning Commission on October 13, 2015 5. Revised Site Plan, Floor Plans, and Elevations Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL 2015-242 Page 12 of 12 PLANNING •COMMISSIO ES• N VOLUTION NO. 2016 -XX A. RECITALS 1 The property owner and applicant, Beatriz Flores, has �filed an application for Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL2015-242 to construct a two-story addition consisting of 2,091 square feet of floor area to an existing 1,904 square -foot, one-story single-family residence with an attached 696 square -foot, three -car garage located at 1606 Ano Nuevo Drive, Diamond Bar, County of Los Angeles, 'California. 2. The following approvals are requested from -the Planning, Commission: (a). Development Review to construct a. two-story addition consisting of 2,091 square feet of floor area. (b) Mi'h-or. Conditional Use Permit to allow a two-story addition to an existing nonconforming structure with 'a rear setback of 16 feet, 11 inches (where 20 feet is required). Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit shall be referred to as the "Proposed Project." 3. The subject property is made up of one parcel totaling 11,730` gross square feet (0.27 gross acres). It is located in the Low Density Residential (RL) zone with an underlying General Plan land Use designation of Low Density Residential. 4. The legal description of the subject property is Lot 144 of Tract 27979. The Assessor's Parcel Number is 8293-022-014. 5. On October 13, 2015, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing, solicited testimony from all interested individuals, and continued said hearing on that date. 6. On February 25, 2016, public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 1,000 -foot radius. of the Project site. On February 26, 2016, notification of the public hearing for this project was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers., In addition to the published and mailed notices, the project site was posted with a public hearing notice on a display board, and the notice was posted at the City's three designated locations. 7. On March 8, 2016, the Planning Commission n of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing, solicited testimony from all interested individuals, and concluded said hearing on that date. B. ROSOLUTION, NOW, THEREFORE, it. is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: 1. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct; and . I 2. The Planning Commission hereby determines the Project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to the provisions of Article 19, Section 15301 (e) (additions to existing structures). of the CEQA Guidelines. Therefore, no further environmental review is required. G. FINDINGS OF FACT Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein and as prescribed under Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Sections 22.48, 22.56, and 22.68, this Planning Commission hereby finds as follows: Development Review Findings (DBMC Section 22.48.040) 1. The design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with the applicable elements of the City's General Plan, City Design Guidelines, and development standards of the applicable district, design guidelines, and architectural criteria for special areas (e. -g., theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards or planned developments). The proposed project complies with the goals and objectives as set forth in the adopted General Plan in terms of land use and density, as well as City's development standards and Residential Design Guidelines. The existing neighborhood was developed between - 1968 and 1979 and complies with Los Angeles County development standards that governed the area prior to incorporation. nc.orporation. 2 DR/MCUP No. PL2015-242 Although the home is approximately 1,854 square feet larger than the average size of homes in the neighborhood, the proposed home appears to be similar in size from the street since the proposed second floor area is significantly set back from the first floor side elevations. The massing of the building is softened by creating articulation of the front fagade by recessing the second -story addition approximately X -O" from the garage on the first floor with an architectural projection above the entrance recessed 2'-0" from the front of the house. In addition, the placement of windows breaks up the massing of the house through articulation of exterior wall surfaces, which results in a less massive building form. Therefore, due to the manner in which the square footage of the second floor addition is distributed, the home will not overwhelm the streetscape and the surroundings from a human scale. The new Mediterranean design and associated design elements and details will be a significant enhancement to the existing home's architectural presence. In sum, the addition will be visually integrated into the existing home and not negatively impact the look and character of the neighborhood. The project site is not part of any theme area, specific plan, community plan, boulevard or planned development. 2. The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. The proposed addition will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments because the use of the project site is designed for a single-family home and the surrounding uses are also single-family homes. In addition, no protected trees exist on site. A portion of the proposed second floor addition over a portion of the existing attached patio cover will have views towards the rear of the property and will not readily impose a line of sight that does not already exist from the ground level of the rear yard of the subject property to the abutting property along the rear property line due to the distance and location of the proposed addition. Existing tall shrubs located along the northwest property line are capable of growing to a maintainable height to minimize the views to/from the adjacent property to the northwest. A condition of approval has been added herein to maintain these shrubs and plant additional shrubs of the same species along a portion of the rear property line to act as a hedge and maintain privacy views looking to/from adjacent properties. The proposed addition will not interfere with vehicular or pedestrian movements, such as access or other functional requirements of a single-family home because it complies with the requirements for driveway widths and is a continuation of an existing use. 3 DR/MCUP No. PL2015-242 3. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain and enhance the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22.48: Development Review Standards, the City's Design Guidelines, the City's General Plan, or any applicable specific plan. The proposed design will be modified to a Mediterranean style of architecture. The project is designed to be compatible with and enhance the character of the existing homes in the neighborhood. The massing of the building is softened by creating articulation of the front fagade by recessing the second - story addition approximately X -O" from the garage on the first floor with an architectural projection above the entrance recessed 2'-0" from the front of the house. Furthermore, the addition will incorporate characteristics of the existing home by using similar color and building materials and will enhance architectural features of the new Mediterranean design. As mentioned, a portion of the proposed second floor addition over a portion of the existing attached patio cover will have views towards the rear of the property and will not readily impose a line of sight that does not already exist from the ground level of the rear yard of the subject property to the abutting property along the rear property line due to the distance and location of the proposed addition. Existing tall shrubs located along the northwest property line are capable of growing to a maintainable height to minimize the views to/from the adjacent property to the northwest. The project, as conditioned herein, will maintain privacy views looking to/from adjacent properties. Therefore, the addition will be visually integrated into the existing home and not negatively impact the look and character of the neighborhood. 4. The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, color, and will remain aesthetically appealing. The architecture of the existing residence is a 1970s tract design with textured stucco on exterior walls, and a gable roof with composite shingles. The proposed design will be modified to a Mediterranean style of architecture, incorporating consistent fenestration patterns and matching exterior colors and building materials. The roof of the proposed addition will be modified to a hip and valley roof with a 3.75:12 pitch. Consistent building elements have been achieved through the utilization of similar architectural features and building materials of the Mediterranean design style. 5. The proposed development will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious (e.g., negative effect on property values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4 DR/MCUP No. PL2015-242 Before the issuance of any City permits, the proposed project is required to comply with all conditions within the approved resolution, and the Building and Safety Division and Public Works Departments requirements. Through the permit and inspection process, the referenced agencies will ensure that the proposed project is not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. 6. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act.. (CEQA) as set forth under Article 19 Section 15301 (e) (additions to existing structures) of the CEQA guidelines. Minor Conditional Use Permit Findings (DBMC Section 22.56.040 1. The proposed use is allowed within the subject zoning district with the approval of a Minor Conditional Use Permit and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Development Code and the Municipal Code. The existing single-family dwelling is a permitted use in the RL zone. A Minor Conditional Use Permit (MCUP) is requested to allow a two-story addition to an existing nonconforming structure with a rear setback of 16 feet, 11 inches (where 20 feet is required). The substandard distance from the structure to the rear property line renders the project nonconforming. The addition of a nonconforming structure requires approval of a Minor Conditional Use Permit because the addition is not limited to the ground floor. The proposed two second -story addition consisting of 2,091 square feet of floor area to an existing one-story home complies with all other development standards of the RL zone. 2.The proposed use is consistent with the general plan and any applicable specific plan. - The proposed ' addition to a single-family dwelling unit is consistent with the City's adopted General Plan. The site is not subject to the provisions of any specific plan. 3. The design, location, size and operating characteristics of the proposed use are compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity. The existing single-family dwelling and the proposed two-story addition consisting of 2,091 square feet of floor area will not encroach into the existing nonconforming rear setback of 16 feet, 11 inches to the rear property line and will be recessed X -O" from the front fagade of the house with an architectural projection above the entrance recessed 2'-0" from the front of the house. The 5 DR/MCUP No. PL2015-242 proposed addition will maintain a minimum 20 -foot rear setback. The proposed design will be modified to a Mediterranean style of architecture, incorporating consistent fenestration patterns and matching exterior colors and building materials. The roof of the proposed addition will be modified to a hip and valley roof with a 3.75:12 pitch. Although the home is approximately 1, 854 square feet larger than the average size of homes in the neighborhood, the proposed. home appears to be similar in size from the street since the proposed second floor area is significantly set back from the first floor side elevations. The massing of the building is softened by creating articulation of the front fagade *by recessing the second -story addition approximately X -O" from the garage on the first floor with an architectural projection above the entrance recessed 2'-0" from the front of the house. In addition, the placement of windows breaks up the massing of the house through articulation of exterior terior wall surfaces, which results in a less massive building form. The project is designed to be compatible with and enhance the character of the existing homes in the neighborhood. Therefore, due to the manner in which the square footage of the second floor addition is distributed, the home will not overwhelm the streetscape and the surroundings from a human scale. 4. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of use being proposed including access, provision of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and the absence of physical constraints. The property is an irregular shaped lot. The existing house is situated on a level pad at the front of the property. The subject site is physically suitable for the existing single-family residential dwelling and the proposed addition. The existing and proposed use of land is consistent with the surrounding land uses. As previously mentioned herein, a portion of the proposed second floor addition over a portion of the existing attached patio cover at the rear of the home will not readily impose a line of sight to adjacent properties and appropriate screening/buffering views to/from adjacent properties is provided. The proposed addition of floor area is consistent with the development standards for the RL zone and will not encroach into the existing nonconforming rear setback. Additionally, although the home is approximately 1, 854 square feet larger than the average size of homes in the neighborhood, the proposed home appears to be similar in size from the street since the proposed second floor area is significantly set back from the first floor side elevations. The massing of the building is softened by creating articulation of the front fagade by recessing the second -story addition. The home will maintain a three -car garage with sufficient off-street parking. There are no physical constraints that prohibit the use and enjoyment of the property and existing utilities are sufficient to provide for the proposed addition. 6 DR/MCUP No. PL2015-242 5. Granting the Minor Conditional Use Permit will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property or improvements in the vicinity and zoning district in which the property is located. The granting of the Minor Conditional Use Permit will allow the addition of the existing single-family dwelling unit in a manner similar with existing dwelling units located in the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed expansion of the dwelling unit will not negatively impact the public interest, health, safety convenience or welfare. 6. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as set forth under Article 19 Section 15301(e) (additions to existing structure) of the CEQA Guidelines. Non -Conforming Structures Findings (DBMC Section 22.68.030) The addition, enlargement, extension, reconstruction, relocation or structural alteration of the nonconforming structure would not result in the structure becoming: Incompatible with other structures in the neighborhood. The proposed two-story addition of floor area is consistent with the development standards for the RL zone. The existing single-family dwelling and the proposed two-story addition consisting of 2,091 square feet of floor area will not encroach into the existing nonconforming rear setback of 16'-11" to the rear property line. The proposed project is located predominantly above the existing and proposed first floor area of the home. The existing and proposed use of land is consistent with the surrounding land uses and structures in the neighborhood. The existing neighborhood was developed between 1968 and 1979 and complies with Los Angeles County development standards that governed the area prior to incorporation. Neighboring properties also have nonconforming setbacks, so the proposed project will remain consistent with other homes within the neighborhood. Although the home is approximately 1, 854 square feet larger than the average size of homes in the neighborhood, the proposed home appears to be similar in size from the street since the proposed second floor area is significantly set back from the first floor side elevations. The massing of the building is softened by creating articulation of the front fagade by recessing the second -story addition approximately X -O" from the garage on the first floor with an architectural projection above the entrance recessed 2'-0" from the front of the house. In addition, the placement of windows breaks up the massing of the house through articulation of exterior wall surfaces, which results in a less massive building form. 7 DR/MCUP No. PL2015-242 Therefore, due to the manner in which the square footage of the second floor addition is distributed, the home will not overwhelm the streetscape and the surroundings from a human scale. 2. Inconsistent with the general plan or any applicable specific plan. The proposed addition to a single-family dwelling unit is consistent with the City's adopted General Plan. The site is not subject to the provisions of any specific plan. 3. A restriction to'the eventual/future compliance with the applicable regulations. of this Development Code. The existing and proposed use of land is consistent with the surrounding land uses with similar rear setbacks. The proposed addition of floor area is consistent with the development standards for the RL zone and will not encroach into the existing nonconforming rear setback. 4. Detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of persons residing in the neighborhood. Before the issuance of any City permits, the proposed project is required to comply with all conditions within the approved resolution, and the Building and Safety Division and Public Works/Engineering Departments requirements. Through the permit and inspection process, the referenced agencies will ensure that the proposed project is not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. 5. Detrimental and/or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood. The addition to the existing single-family dwelling unit will be constructed in a manner similar with existing dwelling units located in the surrounding community and will not be detrimental and/or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood. Based upon the findings and conclusion set forth above, the Planning Commission hereby approves this Application, subject to the -following conditions: 1. Development shall substantially comply with the plans and documents presented to the Planning Commission at the public hearing. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall record, and provide the City with a conformed recorded copy of, a Covenant and Agreement or similar document in a form approved by the City Attorney, which forbids the rental of rooms or other portions of the property under two or more separate agreements and prohibits use of the property as a boarding or rooming house. 8 DR/MCUP No. PL2015-242 3. Tall shrubs shall be maintained along the northwest property line, and additional shrubs of the same species shall be planted along a portion of the rear property line to act as a hedge and maintain privacy among adjacent properties. 4. Standard Conditions. The applicant shall comply with the standard development conditions attached hereto. The, Planning Commission shall: a. Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and b. Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail to the property owner and applicant, Beatriz Flores, 1606 Ano Nuevo Drive, CA 91765, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8th DAY OF MARCH 2016, BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. in 1, Greg Gubman, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of March, 2016, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: ABSTAIN: Commissioners: ATTEST: Greg Gubman, Secretary 9 DRUCUP No. PL2015-242 DLhI011?D :SAR=A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARRTr'TMENT . . . . . . . . . . . 111111q 11111111 11111111 :p'111111��Iiqr USE PERMITS9 COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL ;, • r ODELED STRUCTURES PROJECT #: Development Review and Minor Conditional Use No. PL 2015-242 SUBJECT: To construct a two-story addition consisting of 2,091 square feet of floor an existing 1,904 square -foot, one-story single-family residence with an attached 696 square -foot, three car garage; and Minor Conditional Use Permit (MCUP) to allow a second -story addition to an existing nonconforming structure with a 16 -foot, 11 -inch rear setback (where 20 feet is required PROPERTY Beatriz Flores OWNER/ 1606 Ano Nuevo Drive APPLICANT: Diamond Bar, CA 91765 LOCATION: 1606 Ano Nuevo Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SH . ALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION AT (909) 839-7030, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1 The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, and its officers, agents and employees, from any claim, action, or proceeding to attack, set-aside, void or annul, the approval of Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL2015-242 brought within the time period provided by Government Code Section 66499.37. In the event the city and/or its officers, agents and employees are made a party of any such action: (a) Applicant shall provide a defense to the City defendants or at the City's option reimburse the City its costs of defense, including reasonable attorneys fees, incurred in defense of such claims. 10 DRIMCUP No. PL2015-242 (b) Applicant shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against the City defendants. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action of proceeding, and shall cooperate fully in the defense thereof. 2. This approval shall not be effective for any purpose until the applicant and owner of the property involved have filed, within twenty-one (21) days of approval of this Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL2015-242, at the City of Diamond Bar Community Development Department, their affidavit stating that they are aware of and agree to accept all the conditions of this approval. Further, this approval shall not be effective until the applicants pay remaining City processing fees, school fees and fees for the review. of submitted reports. 3. All designers, architects, engineers, and contractors associated with this project shall obtain a Diamond Bar Business License; and a zoning approval for those businesses located in Diamond Bar. 4. Signed copies of Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016 -XX, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a.licensed Engineer/Architect. 5. Prior to the plan check, revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval. 6. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval shall be completed. 7. The project site shall be maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of approval and all laws, or other applicable regulations. 8. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and any applicable Specific Plan in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 9. All site, grading, landscape/irrigation, and roof plans, and elevation plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of City permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.,) or approved use has, commenced, whichever comes first. 10. The property owner/applicant shall remove the public hearing notice board within three days of this project's approval. 11. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of City Planning, Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works Department, and the Fire Department. 11 DR/MCUP No. PL2015-242 Applicant shall pay development fees (including but not limited to Planning, Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works Department and Mitigation Monitoring) at the established rates, prior to issuance of building or grading permit (whichever comes first), as required by the City. School fees as required shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permit. In addition, the applicant shall pay all remaining prorated City project review and processing fees prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever comes first. 2. Prior to any plan check, all deposit accounts for the processing of this project shall have no deficits. C. TIME LIMITS The ,.approval of Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No.'F� . L2015-242 expires within two years from the date of approval if the use has not been exercised as defined pursuant to Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Section 22.66.050(b)(1). In accordance with DBMC Section 22.60.050(c), the applicant may request, in writing, a one-year time extension for Planning Commission consideration. Such a request must be submitted to the Planning Division prior to the expiration date and be accompanied by the review fee in accordance with the Fee Schedule in effect at the time of submittal. FIA41M 1 This approval is . to construct a 2,091 square -foot, two-story addition to an existing one-story home located at 1606 Ano Nuevo Drive, as described in the staff report and depicted on the approved plans on file with the Planning Division, subject to the conditions listed herein. 2. The construction documents submitted for plan check shall be in substantial compliance with the architectural plans approved by the Planning Commission, as modified pursuant to the conditions below. If the plan check submittal is not in substantial compliance with the approved Development Review submittal, the plans may require further staff review and re -notification of the surrounding property owners, which may delay the project and entail additional fees. 3. To ensure compliance with the provisions of the Planning Commission approval, a final inspection is required from the Planning Division when work for any phase of the project has been completed. The applicant shall inform the Planning Division and schedule an appointment for such an inspection. 4. The above conditions shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all future owners, operators, or successors thereto of the property. Non-compliance with any condition of approval or mitigation measure imposed as a condition of the approval shall constitute a violation of the City's Development Code. Violations may be enforced in accordance with the provisions of the Development Code. 12 DR/MCUP No. PL2015-242 A 5. Failure to comply with any of the conditions set forth above or as subsequently amended in writing by the City, may result in failure to obtain a building final and/or a certificate of occupancy until full compliance is reached. The City's requirement for full compliance may require minor corrections and/or complete demolition of a non-compliant improvement, regardless of costs incurred where the project does not comply with design requirements and approvals that the applicant agreed to when permits were pulled to construct the project. 6. The project site shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the approved plans submitted to, approved, and amended herein by the Planning Commission, collectively attached referenced as site plans, floor plans, architectural elevations, and landscape plans on file with the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 7. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, air conditioning condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berms, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Division. 8. All roof -mounted equipment shall be screened from public view. 9. All structures, including walls, trash enclosures, canopies, etc., shall be maintained in a structurally sound, safe manner with a clean, orderly appearance. All graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours by the property owners/occupant. 10. All landscaping, structures, architectural features and public improvements damaged during construction shall be repaired or replaced upon project completion. The site shall be maintained in a condition, which is free of debris both during and after the construction, addition, or implementation of the entitlement approved herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether during or subsequent to construction shall be done only by the property owner, applicant or by a duly permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste from residential, commercial, construction, and industrial areas within the City. It shall be the applicant's obligation to insure that the waste contractor used has obtained permits from the City of Diamond Bar to provide such services. 2. Mandatory solid waste disposal services shall be provided by the City franchised , waste hauler to all parcels/lots or uses affected by approval of this project. 13 DR/MCUP No. PL2015-242 APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, (909) 839-7040, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 15_1100ffff-: 1. An Erosion Control Plan shall be submitted concurrently with the drainage plan clearly detailing erosion control measures for review and approval. These measures shall be implemented during construction. The erosion control plan shall conform to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards and incorporate the appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP's) as specified in the Storm Water BMP Certification. 2. Grading and construction activities and the transportation of equipment and materials and operation of heavy grading equipment shall be limited to between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. Dust generated by grading and construction activities shall be reduced by watering the soil prior to and during the activities and in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 402 and Rule 403. Reclaimed water shall be used whenever possible. Additionally, all construction equipment shall be properly muffled to reduce noise levels. Detailed drainage system information of the lot shall be submitted. All drainage/runoff from the development shall be conveyed from the site to the natural drainage course. No on-site drainage shall be conveyed to adjacent parcels, unless that is the natural drainage course. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 839-7020, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: •TNIEI• ; At the time of plan check submittal, plans and construction shall conform to current State and Local Building Code (i.e. 2013 California Building Code series will apply) requirements and all other applicable construction codes, ordinances and regulations in effect. 2. Provisions for Cal Green shall be implemented onto plans and certification shall be provided by a third party as required by the Building Division. Specific water, waste, low VOC, and related conservation Cal shall be shown on plans. Construction shall conform to the current Cal Green Code. 1 1111 � 1111 F I §1101 V WN1 R I 9�� 3. The minimum design load for wind in this area is 110 M.P.H. exposures "C" and the site is within seismic zone D or E. The applicant shall submit drawings and calculations prepared by a California State licensed Architect/Engineer with wet stamp and signature. 14 DR/MCUP No. PL2015-242 4. This project shall comply with the energy conservation requirements of the State of California Energy Commission. All lighting shall be high efficacy or equivalent per the current California Energy Code 119 and 150(k). 5. Indoor air quality shall be provided consistent with ASHRAE 62.2 as required per California Energy Code 150(0). 6. Public Works/Engineering Department is required to review and approve grading plans that clearly show all finish elevations, drainage, and retaining wall(s) locations. These plans shall be consistent with the site plan submitted to the Building & Safety Division. 7. All balconies shall be designed for 60lb/ft live load. 8. All easements shall be shown on the site plan. 9. Fire Department approval shall be required. Contact the Fire Department to verify the required fire flow availability due to the home square footage being over 3600 sf total per CFC Appendix B105.1. 10. A.soils report is required per CBC 1803 and all recommendations of the soils report shall be adhered to. PERMIT — ITEMS REQUIRED PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE: 11. Solid waste management of construction material shall incorporate recycling material collection per Diamond Bar Municipal Code 8.16 of Title 8. The contractor shall complete all required forms and pay applicable deposits prior to permit. 12. Prior to building permit issuance, all school district fees shall be paid. Please obtain a form from the Building and Safety Division to take directly to the school district. 13. AQMD notification is required at least 10 days prior to any demolition. Proof of notification is required at permit issuance. 14. All workers on the job shall be covered by workman's compensation insurance under a licensed general contractor. Any changes to the contractor shall be updated on the building permit. CONSTRUCTION — CONDITIONS REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION: 15. All structures and property shall be maintained in a safe and clean manner during construction. The property shall be free of debris, trash, and weeds. 16. All equipment staging areas shall be maintained in an orderly manner and screened behind a minimum 6' high fence. 15 DR/MCUP No. PL2015-242 17. The project shall be protected by a construction fence and shall comply with the NPDES & BMP requirements (sand bags, etc.). 18. The location of property lines may require a survey to be determined by the building inspection during foundation and/or frame inspection. 19. The applicant shall contact Dig Alert and have underground utility locations marked by the utility companies prior to any excavation. Contact Dig Alert by dialing 811 or their website at www.di.galert.org. 20. Any changes or deviation from approved plans during the course of construction shall be approved by the City prior to proceeding with any work. 21. All glazing in hazardous locations shall be labeled as safety glass. The labeling shall be visible for inspection. 22. Pool barriers shall remain in-place at all times. If pool barriers are removed, an immediate stoppage of work shall occur until pool barriers are reinstalled. 23. Carbon monoxide detectors are required in halls leading to sleeping rooms per CRC R315. 24. Drainage patterns shall match the approved grading/drainage plan from the Public Works/Engineering Department. Surface water shall drain away from the building at a 2% minimum slope. The final as -built conditions shall match the grading/drainage plan or otherwise approved as -built grading/drainage plan. 25. Decks, roofs, and other flat surfaces shall slope at least 1/4"/ft with approved and listed water proofing .material. Guardrails shall be provided for these surfaces at least 42" minimum in height, 4" maximum spacing between rails, and capable of resisting at least 20 pounds per lineal foot of lateral load. 26. Special inspections and structural observation will be required in conformance to CBC 1704 to 1709. 27. All plumbing fixtures shall be replaced to meet CA Civil Code 1101.1 to 1101.8. All plumbing fixtures shall be low flow type. MEN 16 DR/MCUP No. PL2015-242 Attachment 2 MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 13, 2015 CALL TO ORDER: Chair/Low called the meeting to . order at 7:00 13.m. in the City Hall Windmill Room, 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Vice Chair Mahlke led the Pledge of Allegiance. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Frank Farago, Bob Nishimura, Raymond Wolfe, Vice Chairperson Jennifer "Fred" Mahlke, Chairperson Ruth Low Also present: Greg Gubman, community Development Director; James Eggart, Assistant City -Attorney; Grace Lee, Senior Planner; Natalie T. Espinoza, Assistant Planner; Josue Esping, Planning Consultant; Mayuko Nakajima, Associate Planner; and Stella Marquez, Administrative Coordinator. 2. . MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCEIPUBLIC COMMENTS: . None 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: As presented 4. CONSENT CALENDAR: 4.1 Minutes of the Regular Meeting of September 8, 2015. C/Wolfe moved, C/Farago seconded, to approve the Minutes of the September c 8, 2015, Meeting as presented. Motion carried by the follow . ing Roll Call vote: AYES. NOES: ABSENT: 5. OLD BUSINESS: A 7. COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: None NEW BUSINESS: None PUBLIC HEARING(S):. Farago, Nishimura, Wolfe, VC/Mahlke, Chair/Low' None None • 7.1 DGv.elo merit Reviewd il Use Permit No. FLZU'i Under the authority of DiamonBar Municipal Code (QBMC) Sections 22.48 and 22.56, the applicant and owner requested Development Review approval to construct a two-story addition consisting of 1,406 square foot, one-story, OCTOBER 13, 2015 PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION single family residence with an attached 666 square foot, two -car garage on a 0.15 gross acre (6,633 gross square foot),,*lot. A Minor Conditional Use Permit was requested to allow a second -story addition to an existing nonconforming structure with a 17 -foot, 8 -inch rear setback where 20 feet is required. The subject property is zoned Low *Medium, Density Residential (RLM) with a consistent underlying General Plan land use designation of Low Medium Density Residential PROJECT ADDRESS: MINEWRIMMM 216 Cottonwood Cove Drive Diam6n4 Bar, CA 91765 Lewis Lam 6556 Darcena Street Chino, CA 91710 APPLICANT: Richard Su 8th I 155 N. Lake Avenue, Floor Pasadena, CA 91101 AP/Espinoza presented staff s report and recommended Planning Commission approval of Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL2015-264, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of 'approval as listed within the resolution. ' C/Nishimura asked what the deed restriction entails and AP/Espinoza responded that, the deed restriction is a covenant and agreement which specifies that the house remain a single family home and that there can be no more than one lease agreement with renters on the property which is also a condition of approval within the resolutio:n . C/Nishimura asked if that meant the owner could have one -only rental agreement and not two simultaneous rental/lease agreements where for examp .. Ile, the upstairs and downstairs could be rented to different parties) and AP/ . EspJnoza responded that C/Nishimura's interpretation was correct. C/Nishimura asked if the Cypress trees would be planted along the rear portion of the lot or along the north and south*, sides of the house. AP/Espinoza responded that the Cypress trees will be* planted along the south side of the house where the balcony is located as depicted in the drawing. She further indicated that the rear of the property is:._heavily landscaped and very steep which prevents view of the neighbor's property. C/Nishimura asked if the second -story Windows were aligned such that they did not look into the second story -bedroom window of the existing two-story house to the north of the project and AP/Espinoza responded affirmatively. OCTOBER 13, 2015 PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION Chair/Low asked if construction would impact the homeowner down the slope to the rear of the project. AP/Espinoza reiterated that she visited the site and took pictures that show the tall trees at the rear property line of the project site as well as, 'on the neighboring property which provides very dense, heavy landscaping so that the addition will most likely not impact the neighbor . s. Chair/Low asked how the property owners proposed to water the green roof and AP/Espinoza referred Chair/Low to the architect for a response. Chair/Low asked if the deed restriction operated as a matter of law despit tecondition and ACA/Eggart responded that the deed resis elaratory of what the existing law is and essentially puts property owners on notice that t I hey need to comply with the Municipal Code (provisions on boarding houses) It does not impose any new requirement that does not already exist. Chair/Low opened- the public hearing. . Lewis Lam, property owner, stated that he and his family will live in the house and that it will not be a rental unit. Once he receives the permits, the tenants will be gone and the parking and noise issues will be gone as well. He graduated from Walnut High School and wants to move back into the City with his parents who work in Diamond Bar. Richard Su, project designer, responded to Chair/Low that the green roofs are designed to provide infiltration for the planters on the roof level before going to the landscaped area because the lot is very small. There are vegetative modules that can be purchased that could be used to provide six months of self-sustainable it is left as -is temporary irrigation and once it becomes because they are drought tolerant species that require little if any irrigation. If the City wants something that needs to be irrigated it can be done just as it would be done for a planter on grade. Chair/Low felt it was a nice concept but if it was not watered it could look dead and bean eyesore. In addition, drought - tolerant means some water and not zero water. Mr. Su said he completely understood Chair/Low's concern. The modules have been used with other projects and have been successful in spite of no irrigation for two years following the initial six-month setup. If the Commission is concerned it is not difficult to run a permanent drip system with a separate timer. The modules provide additional field of rain water before flowing through the downspout into the cisterns at the ground level. Mr. Su stated that since the proposed project is a two-story,unit preserving the privacy of the neighbors is a big priority. The home to the north is a two-story house and there is a 6x4 foot windoof n thsdohdlelffset the window so that the line sight does not cross the neighbor' window. When a bedroom window is placed on the side of a house, they are OCTOBER 13, 2015 PAGE 4 PLANNING COMMISSION 'high windows (six feet above the floor) except for the very rear corner which is out of the line -of -sight. The house to the south is a single -story house and is about three feet lower than the finished grade. So along with the six-foot walls for the project site their wall is about nine feet lower which gives them a nine - foot buffer. In addition, the project minimizes any possible intrusion by including tall and narrow windows in the bedroom with most of the windows being oriented toward the back to capture the view. The proposed landscape screening is 15 feet tall and with the three foot lower elevation that neighbor is getting about 18 feet of visual screening in about 15 years. The Cypress trees are six to eight feet tall and they grow a foot or two each year so in five years they will be about 15 feet tall to provide screening for the neighbor's swimming pool. Although the architecture is more modern than the existing architecture it is compatible to the neighborhood using compatible materia ' Is including stucco, stone veneer and regular roofing tiles. He reiterated that this dwelling is meant to be a single family home. With only four bedrooms and the square footage it is not intended to be a multi -family home or rental for boarding house. There is a detached guest house in the back which will be razed to downgrade the density of the residence. He asked the Commission for consideration of removing the deed restriction for this home which has always been a single family residence in a single family zone. VC/Mahlke asked if the Italian Cypress were drought resistant and Mr. Su said he would not consider them to be drought resistant but they do well in this climate. In addition, there is established irrigation which will help them continue to thrive. CNVoIfe asked about the window on the north side that exists in the walk-in closet and how it lines up with the -6x4 window on the neighbor's property and Mr. Su said that the 6x4 window is roughly at the tall window in the center so the tall narrow window in the hallway clears the second story of the house to the north as depicted on the site survey. The windows do -not directly face each other. Art Kahn, 219 Cottonwood Cove Drive, said he has had two of his cars hit by people who live at the residence. After their parties, there are beer cans on. the sidewalks. This proposal seems ambiguous especially with respect to the deed restriction. Based on the applicant's testimony it will be a single family residence but he believed that a lease would allow six to eight people in the residence as well, should he decide to leave and rent the house out again. ChairlLow closed the public hearing. ACA/Eggart explained that the deed restriction would not prohibit the property owner from renting out the property. That is not something the City has the authority to prohibit property owners from doing — they have the right to rent OCTOBER 13, 2015 PAGE 5 PLANNING COMMISSION out their property. However, the Municipal Code does not allow people to use their property as a "boardinghouse" -in a residential zone. A boardinghouse means the property is being rented under multiple rental agreements. The speaker is right that any property owner could rent under one rental agreement to a renter who may have as many people in their family unit as can fit in the house which is not something the City can regulate through conditions of approval. The limit of a City's regulation is what is permitted occupancy under the Building Code which is remarkably high. C/Nishimura asked if the deed restriction was in place or written into the resolution. ACA/Eggart explained that the deed restriction is a proposed condition of approval that says the property owner would record a deed restriction that essentially says the property could not operate as a if "boardinghouse or other use prohibited by Municipal Code. it is in the, resolution at the end of the main body of the resolution prior to the standard - conditions. VC/Mahlke asked if a property owner would be able to petition to. have that deed restriction removed at some point and ACA/Eggart responded that it is something that could be written into the deed -restriction document which is essentially a contract with the City should the commission so direct. VC/Mahlke asked for confirmation.that the deed restriction reinforces what is currently in place for every property owner in Diamond * Bar. ACA/Eggart said yes, and essentially says the owner could not operate the property as a "boardinghouse" or other illegal use except to the extent permitted by the Municipal Code. it is merely a "notice" document so that the property owner hey did not know they . were supposed to comply cannot come back and argue t with this law. -Chair/Low asked if this has been done before and ACA/Eggart says he has seen this condition before. CDD/Gubman said it became a standard condition, prior to when he began working in Diamond Bar. This is a boilerplate condition that has been imposed on numerous Projects and it is nothing unique or specific to this project. If there is a history associated with *a particular property, this is a measure the City uses to ensure that the property owner is placed on notice. By placing that on the deed, future purchasers of the .property receive that disclosure that the property cannot be {ruabdividedas a."boardinghouse"and when there are floorplans proposed t may appear to present an opportunity to partition off sections or add new exterior entrances and so forth * . When these opportunities present themselves staff does whatever possible to thwart the pursuit of that opportunity that might be seen .by a future purchaser. Chair/Low asked if there was a history regarding this particular property that caused this deed restriction tdbhe lacedoDDhthe extent that staff has heatcomplaints that this residence apparently OCTOBER 13, 2015 PAGE 6 PLANNING COMMISSION has a reputation that has caused some disruption in the peace and harmony of the neighborhood. Staff feels that based on these complaints, it is appropriate to place the covenant on the property even though it has been stated that as is set in the statutes in * the City's Municipal Code that this is a single family residence. For some reason that may not be apparent at this time, this house has been Used as a rental before and the renters that have been attracted to this property apparently have a need to be put under a watchful eye. Chair/Low asked if there was a sunset provision on these restrictions and CDD/Gubman responded no, the restrictions run with the land in perpetuity and cannot be quit claimed without consent by the City. Chair/Low asked if the property owner could petition the City to remove the restriction and CDD/Gubman said "yes." C/Nishimura asked that under the current Code the owner moves in and rents a room out that is not a boarding house and it is legal to which CDD/Gubman responded that the homeowner can rent a maximum of one bedroom to a boarder. C/Wolfe moved, VC/Mahlke seconded, to approve Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. as4�is PL2015-thigFand subject to the conditions of approvaled within the resolution and corrected by staff. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Farago, VC/MahNishimuraCha, Wolfe, lke, ir/Low NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None 7.2 Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL2015-242 - Under theauthorityof Diamond Bar Municipal Code Sections 22.48 and 22.56, the applicant/owner requested Development Review approval to construct a two-story addition consisting of 2,382 square feet of floor area to an existing 1,904 square foot, one=s.tory single family residence with an attached 696 square foot, three -car garage on a 0.27 gross acre (11,730 gross square foot) lot. A Minor Conditional Use Permit was requested to allow a second story addition to an existing nonconforming structure with a 16 foot 11 inch rear setback where 20 feet is required, and a nonconforming distance to a structure on the adjacent lot to the west of 11 feet, 1 inch where 15 feet is required. The subject property is zoned Low Density Residential (RL) with a consistent underlying General Plan land use designation of Low Density Residential. PROJECT ADDRESS: 1606 Ano Nuevo Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 OCTOBER 13, 2015 PAGE 7 PLANNING COMMISSION PROPERTY OWNER/ Beatriz Flores APPLICANT: 1606 Ano Nuevo Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 PC/Espino presented staffs report.and recommended Planning commission approval of Development. Review and Minor Conditional thecoedtionsNo. PI -2015-242, based on the Findings of Fact, and subjct to of approval as listed within the resolution. C/Wolfe said that the view from bedroom #4 on the second floor to the southeast neighbor appears to be potentially infringing on their privacy in the back *yard and asked if staff had considered that in its review. PC/Espino responded that staff looked at the neighborhood sensitivity with .respect to the adjoining properties. In this particular case the distance that was maintained on that side of the property was felt by staff to be adequate on the southea side which is 15 feet from the adjacent property. There is no pool or balcony at side whereas, the .extending out on that northwest side has a pool and staff has conditioned that side of the property to maintain existing tall shrubs and conditioned the rear of the property to maintain shrubs. If that is a concern, it is within the Commission's purview to extend the condition to include the southeast side of the property. C/Wolfe said he found it odd that one side and not the other was conditioned when it is clear that the project has the view shed into the neighbor's backyard. There may not be a pool in that neighbor's back yard today but it does not mean that one might be put in someday. C/Nishimura asked if the second story bedroom window toward the front on the north side looked into the two upstairs bedrooms of the house to the north (left). 'Staff requested the applicant to modify the size of the windows to provide privacy from the residence as well as, to the neighbors. One window in particular staff felt was adequate to provide lighting for the bedroom and did not feel there would be direct line -of -sight because there is shrubbery on that side of the property line. The distance is about 30 feet becausfltheb alcarea on the adjacent neighbors balcony to the northwest is direyve the garage with the habitable floor area recessed a significant area from the garage. In performing a visual test on the site plan, there is a distance of about 22 feet from corner to corner and in reality, the adjacent home is recessed far beyond the front fagade of the home. Chair/Low asked if the right -of -privacy extended to the deck area and PC/Espino responded technically, no. The imposing view might be from the existing balcony onto the subject property. This is an issue that was discussed with the applicant and it was felt that the privacy would be maintained. OCTOBER 13, 2015 PAGE 8 PLANNING COMMISSION C/Nishimura asked if the required setback was 15 feet on that side of the project property and PC/Espino said that it is 10 feet from the property line and 15 feet to structures on adjoining properties. Chair/Low. opened the public hearing. Katie Flores, MK Studio, project designer/architect, said that bedroom #4 window mentioned by C/Wolfe, the separation between the two houses is significant and the project lot is slightly higher than the neighboring lot. So these factors along with the landscape materials should, provide sufficient privacy. For the office window as discussed by C/Nishl , mura, due to the pie shape of the lots it worked to the applicant's advantage that the neighboring structure walls are not parallel to each other so they are splayed and from that window one would be looking more toward the front door of"the house and not into the front windows facing the street. She reiterated thOt the prayer room was not intended to be a house of worship. The owner wants ants a quiet sitting room/den at the front of the house where one could sit, meditate and pray in privacy, a room that. was not part of a bedroom and hustlo, and bustle of. the main living spaces. In additioh, one of the bedrooms on the second floor is intended to be an office and another is a bonus room for teenage boys to have their own space away from the adult living space downstairs. Tony Maze said that Ms. Flores has been a good neighbor and there are six cohesive neighbors on the street. One issue for him is that prior to Ms. Flores owning the property, a doctor owned the property and was involved in illegal activities and not knowing what circumstances might change, would there be a deed restriction placed on this property. The house is very large for the neighborhood and while he is not concerned about his current neighbor, he is concerned about future ownership and use. Chair/Low as n- * ked how many years Mr. Maze had been a neighbor to Mrs. Flores and he responded since 1997., Ron Escodon, 1627 Ano Nuevo Drive, said he had an issue with doubling the size of the house where othe.r houses in the neighborhood are much smaller in a small cul-de-sac area where parking is at a premium. - Robert Van, 1620 Acacia Hill, said his concern is that the house will be a church because he has seen church activities taking place at the ccommadate he believes that will continue. A 4,000square foot home will a several hundred people and vehicles will be parking on that street and spill over onto other streets and as a result, in an emergency the street will become inaccessible to. emergency equipment. He is certain the house will be a business and he is concerned about traffic when a business is in the middle of a neighborhood. OCTOBER 13, 2015 PAGE 9 PLANNING COMMISSION Beatriz Flores said she has lived on Ano Nuevo Drive since 1997. She is the eldest of 17 children. She took care of her mother and father. Now that she is 70 her daughter is concerned about her staying in her house and asked her to sell the house so she could live with her daughter. Understanding that her parents were very sad to leave their home and her aunt was really sad to leave her home, her daughter decided to build instead of moving- out of the neighborhood. There will be no business and there will not be a church. She said "we do come together in prayeras do other neighbors and for family gatherings. Her daughter wanted to build a dream home because she wanted .to create space which she understood. was important to her mother. Her family is a professional family and they understand laws and abide by those laws People have gathered at her residence for dodtoral celebrations that merit people coming into their home. She said she could guarantee there would not be a business in her home and that. it would not be a church. Her family grew kitchen, bedroom or living room the family up in prayer and whether in theit opportunity for them to create a came together. Her family felt this was an opportu residence will not s . pace because the family has been limited in space. The be turned into a boardinghouse. She felt it was her privilege to be able to turn her small house into a 4,000 square foot home to accommodate her family. Chair/Low closed the public hearing. C/Nishimura noted that Finding of Fact "C" 1 in the resolution states that this should be approved and that it is consistent with several things including the design guidelines. His copy of the Residential Guidelines, Page ding about tract homes and how as they age, they will be remodel ' ed. ' Further, it states that one of the most important issues is to ensure that new or remodeled residential development is compatible and complementary to the existing neighborhood. Page 33 talks about compatibility and three states that. dwellings and other improvements should be appropriate in mass and scale to the site on which they are placed. The .site in relationship * to other. structures., etc. should. be complementary and depicts a "yes" and "no." In looking at this. proposal, the size of the addition is quite largo and the architecture conclusion is to him not compatible. He asked staff to explain how they came to the that this architecture and mass to the front was compatible to the neighborhood. when the development.guideline photo clearly shows that it is not. PC/Espino said that as stated, the design guidelines address issues of compatibility and mass and scale. Staff looks at these projects in the form of context in the neighborhood as well as how the massing scale relates to the building, its neighbors and the neighborhood. In this case, there is mass and scale that is recessed from the front, a majority of which is above the existing floor area. As far as the floor area itself, there is no floor area ratio standard that staff can use to equate or evaluate to other homes. He could say that the OCTOBER 13, 2015 PAGE 10 PLANNING COMMISSION' average floor area in the neighborhood was about 2100 to 2200 square feet in a mix of single story homes' and two-story homes. Yes, this is a substantial addition; however, it complies with the City's Development Standards in setbacks, proximity to adjacent structures and is also under the lot coverage ratio. Potentially, all of the lots iry the neighborhood could increase substantially more. In addressing the guidelines in the design aspect, staff looks to make sure that the character of the home is consistent with other homes in the neighborhood. There are Mediterranean design styles that have been transformed from tract homes to what is seen today. Staff also looks at whether this is a predominately one-story or two-story home neighborhood. In this case, it is a mix. The neighbor to the southeast is a single story, the neighbor to the northwest is a two-story. Going back to the context issue, if this home were in the middle of the block it might be a challenge to say this fits into the neighborhood. This project being toward the cul-de-sac (tucked into the corner) and the proposed floor area addition being above the current floor area (a little over 300 feet), staff felt it was compatible to the design standards and those goals and objectives described in the City's General Ptah. Chair/Low said that as one proceeds up Ano Nuevo toward the property, there are two other houses that were quite large on the opposite side of the street and PC/Espino reiterated that there are many existing two-story homes in the immediate neighborhood which averaged about 2200 square feet. Chair/Low said that the house next to the subject property is a two-story home as well. C/Farago asked how many feet the house facing the property is and PC/Espino said it is a two-story home upwards of 2000 square feet. C/Farago said that the largest two-story homes in' the neighborhood average 2300 square feet and this project proposes to be over 4000 square feet. Chair/Low asked to see the renderings again stating she thought the second story was recessed and Katie Flores said that the proposal sets the second floor back over the garage with a good amount of roof between the face of the garage and the second floor which was broken up with little elements of towers to give it the Mediterranean articulation and tower over the front door. Chair/Low asked if the prayer room was being brought forward to line up with the garage. Katie Flores'said yes and that it remains set back from the front setback a good distance at that point. Due to the shape of the lot, the front right corner of the proposed addition is actually at the back corner of the front element of the neighbor's house which means the project is 30 to 40 feet back at that point. Although it appears flat on the plans when viewed from the street, the front of the house where the prayer' room is located is quite far back from the sidewalk. * OCTOBER 13, 2015 PAGE . 11 PLANNING COMMISSION PC/Espino stated that staff included a condition to provide a covenant and agreement as part of the resolution with respect to maintaining the home as a single family home as its Intended use and restricts the rental . of rooms to no more than one. Chair/Low said that there was no evidence provided to the Commission that there has been any interruption or unintended use of this property. She asked ACA/Eggart for clarification that there are no restrictions on how big a person can make their house. ACA/Eggart said there are development standards for heights and lot coverage ratio. CDD/Gubman said there are rest ' rictions as to lot coverage, building separation requirements and setback requirements as well as, building height. Chair/ Low asked if in this case the Commission was within the parameters of permissible size and CDD/Gubman said definitely. There is no question of whether or not this proposal meets the development standards. He believes the question goes to the findings of compatibility and conformance with the design guidelines which is where the role of the,Commission comes to the forefront where the more qualitative or subjective review of the appropriateness of this project needs to be deliberated upon. Yes, the project meets the development standards. Staff has reviewed this project in the context of the neighborhood, the orientation of the building, the particular characteristics of the streetscape and staffs recommendation is to approve it based on it fitting into that neighborhood streetscape. The guidelines are intended to be used as a guidepost to evaluate the project and to consider the subjective views of the neighborhood at large, whether this is an appropriate project as proposed. C/Farago asked what would be the largest home that could be put on the lot. PC/Espino said that this could. be a flat roofed three-story home with a 35 foot height limit with no floor area ratio requirement the development standards would limit the volume of this home. Conceivably, one could havea home twice the size of the home being proposed. C/Farago said that in looking at the elevation it seems to be massive. If the ridgeline is actually further back, the cross view on the plans is deceiving because it makes it appear larger than what it actually is if it is set back. He asked where the ridqeline is in relationship to the property line at the sidewalk at the driveway entrance and PC/Espino said it is set back quite a distance because there is a transition from the design going from tract home to Mediterranean style which will incorporate a hip roof. Currently, there is a gable roof which is more imposing on the front. A hip roof has rooflines that OCTOBER 13, 2015 PAGE 12 PLANNING COMMISSION are set back. He guessed that it was about 20 feet from the face to the back of the garage so it is probably 40 feet from the ridgeline to the front property line. C/Farago asked where the current ridgeline lies and PC/Espino said it is a gable roof directly above the garage. C/Wolfe commented that this is a very beautiful design but he agrees with C/Nishimura that the design of the house is probably a bit imposing to the neighborhood. He thinks there are some redeeming qualities to contemplate such as the orientation of the house, the fact that the front of the house to the right of the proposed project is behind the house on the southeast corner but this is a very large house and he thinks the Commission heeds to be careful about allowing mansions in neighborhoods that do not support them. He. is not saying he has made a decision but he is concerned about the mass of the house. He understands that the architect attempted to add * ress that issue by including different planes at the front of the house for whichhe complemented the architect on the features proposed. He believed the orientation ultimately helps the proposal significantly. -A C/Nishimura said that based on C/Wolfe's concern about the ridgeline that if one looks at the photo the existing roofline is 17 feet 6 inches tall and when this project is built the new roofline will be just over 23 feet across the top. VC/Mahlke said she appreciated neighbors speaking before the Commission and how kindly they spoke about the applicant. She ' understands their concerns and trusts the systems that are currently in place that will help counter any of those concerns in terms of parking and business. She acknowledged the potential overbuild for this project as also indicated by her colleagues. At 1900 square feet up without any other changes this home would be at 3800 square feet. Because of that she said she would move to accept the proposed plan. VC/Mahlke moved, Chair/Low seconded, to approve Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL2015-242, Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. Motion failed 2-3 by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: VC/Mahlke, Chaikow NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Farago, Nishimur! , Wolfe ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None C/Nishimura moved to deny the project. ACA/Eggart said that denial of a Development Review application requires written Findings and Facts to support those Findings. C/N.ishimura is making a motion and articulating Findings that staff could put into a resolution but a OCTOBER 13, 2015 MPAGE 13 PLANNING COMISSION resolution would be required and in order to do so, this item would need to be continued ontinued to a future meeting to bring back a written resolution of, denial for consideration by the commission. lh-addition, CDD/Gubman asked him to advise the Commission that it could be continued to allow the applicant an opportunity redesign which is within the purview of the Commission. C/Nishimura moved to direct staff to rewrite the resolution -to deny the applicant - - based on the Findings that it does not meet the City's Design Guidelines and give the applicant a chance to come back. ACA/Eggart 'advised the Commission that those would be alternative options. The option to give the .applicant an opportunity to come back to the Commission with a revised plan for consideration would- not be a denial , it would be a continuance. Chair/Low said that Findings have not yet been made. ACA/Eggart restated C/Nishimura's motion to continue the public hearing ring to a future date certain and to direct staff to prepare a Resolution of Denial on the basis that Findings 1 and 3 required for approval of Development Review could not be made on the basis that the design is inconsistent with the City Design Guidelines, specifically provisions on pages 32 and 33 as well as, that under Finding 3 that due to the square footage and size of the addition in comparison with the size of other existing homes in the neighborhood, this project is out of character with the other homes in the neighborhood. ACA/Eggaft asked if his reiteration of C/Nishimura's motion was consistent with . his wishes. ACA/Eggart said that for a future date he is not certain whether everyone will be present for that meeting and the Commission may wish to select a different meeting date. C/Farago said his main concern is the mass toward the front and the size if it was in the back away from the sightline of the street it could pretty much be anything as long as it did not affect the look and feel of the neighborhood. If the Commission made a separate or inclusive motion to allow time for the applicant to redesign and bring that back to the commission, is that an option at this point. ACA/Eggart responded that it would be a separate motion and it would be articulated as continue the item to a date certain to allow the applicant the opportunity to redesign pursuant to direction provided by the Commission. If that is the nt ionggapbg'to ring be reopened to ask the applicif that is something they are willido. CMolfe said he would like to second the continuance motion. He obviously cast the third and deciding vote this evening but he believes that the orientation of the property allows the opportunity for some changes to the proposed project so that the mass scale at the front of the house is not so imposing. He OCTOBER 13, 2015 PAGE 14 PLANNING COMMISSION believes there is an opportunity to make adjustments to the design that would allow this size of a house or something close to it to fit into the neighborhood and its character without being such a dramatic imposition although, as he has repeatedly stated, it is a beautiful design. Chair/Low reopened the public hearing. Chair/Low asked . Beatriz Flores if she was willing to take additional time to redesign the project to better conform to the City's Design Guidelines and Mrs. Flores responded "definitely, yes." Chair/Low asked how long it would - take to complete the redesign and Katie Flores said it would depend on staff as well because it would take a bit of back and forth to make sure that they reached a favorable conclusion. She is sorry that PC/Espino would not be available to work on the project and asked if their project would be assigned to a new planner. CDD/Gubman directed his comments to Chair/Low that in response to questions about continuance dates, PC/Espino is under contract with the City. Although he has resigned as a City employee, he is on retainer as a consultant to the City and he will continue to be the project manager for this project. PC/Espino will also continue to work with the City as it moves forward to help with the General Plan update and other important tasks. With the continuity and momentum that staff has set for this project he would suggest it be continued approximately one month to the Rovember 10 agenda. If the item is continued to a specific date it does not require that the project be re -noticed. Should November 10 pass without all of the issues being resolved it can be continued to a future date. Chair/Low asked if November 10, 2015, was a suitable date for Ms. Flores she responded "yes." CDD/Gubman advised the applicant that state law requires that a decision to approve or deny a project be made within 180 days of an application being deemed complete. ACA/ad continuing the project to November 10 was sufficient and hrt athe would address the matter with staff after that. Chair/Low again closed the public hearing. Chair/Low asked for a second on C/Nishimura's motion. C/Nishimurals motion died for lack of a second. OCTOBER 13, 2015 PAGE15 PLANNING COMMISSION C/Farago moved, C/Wolfe seconded to reopen the public hearing and continue Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL2015-242 to November 10, 2015, to allow the applicant the opportunity to redesign the project pursuant to direction provided by the Commission. C/Nishimura made a substitution motion to include notices be sent to the property owners within 1000 feet of the project to advise them of the continuation. C/Farago seconded the motion. PC/Espino stated that should the Commission wish to continue the matter, the best way to handle it may be to continue the matter to a date uncertain in which case staff would automatically re -notify the project and it would not place a burden on the applicant and staff to conclude the project on November 10. In addition, those who have attended tonight's meeting would not be under the impression that the matter might be concluded on November 10. ACA/Eggart explained that there cannot be two motions on the floor; however, the maker of the motion could, with the consent. of the second motion maker, amend his motion if so inclined. C/Nishimura agreed to substitute his motion to continue Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL2015-242 to a date uncertain to allow the applicant the opportunity to redesign the project p - ursuant to direction provided by the Commission. C/Farago seconded C/Nis'himura's substitute motion. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Nishimura, Wolfe, VC/Mahlke, Chair/Low NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None 8. PLANNING COMMISSIONER COMMENTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: C/Nishimura commended CDD/Gubman and his staff. He noticed a couple of weeks ago that the little street signs on north Diamond ar Boulevard were getting out of hand. He drove out one day and noticed that thBe Code Enforcement Officer had cleaned up the street after which it looked 100 percent better. He became aware of another situation where CDD/Gubman went way beyond the call of duty and were doing specialized things. There is an abandoned house in North Diamond Bar*and they went to the extraordinary length ngth of declaring it a public nuisance, getting an inspection warrant and they will abate the property and lien it for abatement costs as well as attorney fees. These procedures are technical and involved and he thanked CDD/Gubman and his staff for doing such a great job. OCTOBER 13, 2015 PAGE 16 PLANNING COMMISSION .3 im Chait/Low thanked CDD/Gubman and his staff for a great job as usual. She asked CDD/Gubman to introduce his new staff member. CDD/Gubman introduced Associate Planner Mayuko (May) Nakajima whose first day was Wednesday, September 30. May comes to Diamond Bar from the City of Rancho Cucamonga. She began her career as a student aid while attending CalPbly Pomona. Upon graduation she was promoted to Assistant Planner. May brings to Diamond Bar some really valuable experience that the City will capitalize on as it moves forward on the General Plan Update as well as, saving the. City from certain doom because Josue had to leave his post as a full time employee. As mentioned at the City Council meeting last week there were over 150 applicants and through two screen processes, the number was reduced from 153 to 59 and after he personally reviewed each of the applications he selected 8 to move forward, through the panel interview process. During the panel review, May was rated first among each of the three panelists. He is very happy and excited to bring May on board as a member of the Diamond Bar team. STAFF COMMENTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 9.1 Public Hearing dates for future projects. CDD/Gubman stated that on October 27 the agenda will consist of an addition to a single family residence on Timberline Road south of Pathfinder Road. Chair/Low asked the current status of Haggen's market. CDD/Gubman reported that Haggen's has filed for bankruptcy and are pulling out of the southwest. They are liquidating all of their acquisitions in those markets from the Von's/Albertson's required sale. At present he does not know what will happen at the Haggen's store. The City has major retail grocery chains that are interested in locating in Diamond Bar, and staff hopes that the down time is ataminimum. The unfortunate discouraging news is that the City had a viable supermarket before the mandated transfer to Haggen's. Haggen's obviously underestimated the task of growing from a chain*of about 17 stores to 160 stores. it is unfortunate for employees at that store who thought they would keep their jobs. - He hopes it plays out well that a new supermarket reoccupies the location and that the regulators that placed a prohibition on Von's/Albertsons's from hiring former Haggen's employees is lifted to help with the situation. As soon as he learns what is likely to happen and he is at liberty to share the information with the commission he will certainly do so. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: As listed in tonight's agenda. OCTOBER 13, 2015 PAGE 17 PLANNING COMMISSION ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Planning commission, Chair/Low adjourned the regular meeting at 9:10 P.M. The foregoing minutes are hereby approved this 27th day of October, 2015. Attest: Respectfully Submitted, Greg Gubman Community Development Director 6xrl-'� Ruth Low, Chairperson A Horses within 500 -foot Radius of the Project Site The proposed project -when combined with the existing floor area -will total 3,995 square feet and consist of 6 bedrooms and 5 bathrooms. The table below compares the proposed project with the size of neighboring homes within a 500 -foot radius of the subject property: Address Year Built Bedrooms Bathrooms Square Feet 1614 ACACIA HILL RD 1968 4 3 2,205 1617 ACACIA HILL RD 1968 4 3 2,205 1620 ACACIA HILL RD 1968 4 2 2,189 1626 ACACIA HILL RD 1968 4 2 1,889 1632 ACACIA HILL RD 1968 4 2 1,889 1633 ACACIA HILL RD 1968 4 3 2,120 1638 ACACIA HILL RD 1968 3 2 1,786 1642 ACACIA HILL RD 1968 4 2 2,747 1648 ACACIA HILL RD 1968 4 3 2,687 1649 ACACIA HILL RD 1968 4 3 2,205 1652 ACACIA HILL RD 1968 4 3 2,289 1658 ACACIA HILL RD 1968 3 2 1,786 1659 ACACIA HILL RD 1968 4 2 2,189 1665 ACACIA HILL RD 1968 4 3 2,205 1600 ANO NUEVO DR 1970 4 3 2,230 1601 ANO NUEVO DR 1970 5 4 2,359 1606 ANO NUEVO DR 1970 4 3 1,904 1609 ANO NUEVO DR 1970 4 3 2,522 1614 ANO NUEVO DR 1970 3 2 1,433 1619 ANO NUEVO DR 1970 4 2 1,780 1627 ANO NUEVO DR 1970 3 2 1,433 1630 ANO NUEVO DR 1970 4 2 1,780 1635 ANO NUEVO DR 1973 3 2 1,899 1638 ANO NUEVO DR 1970 4 3 2,025 1645 ANO NUEVO DR 1992 3 3 2,137 1646 ANO NUEVO DR 1970 4 2 1,780 1652 ANO NUEVO DR 1970 3 3 1,817 1704 ANO NUEVO DR 1970 3 2 1,535 1441 BLENBURY DR 1977 4 3 2,683 1503 BLENBURY DR 1977 3 2 1,463 1509 BLENBURY DR 1977 4 33,090 1510 BLENBURY DR 1977 41 2 1,600 1520 BLENBURY DR 19771 41 3 1,714 1521 BLENBURY DR 1977 5 5 3,072 1529 BLENBURY DR 1977 4 3 2,083 1530 BLENBURY DR 1977 4 3 2,083 1535 BLENBURY DR 1977 4 3 1,714 1539 BLENBURY DR 1977 4 3 1,714 22215 CROLL CT 1979 4 3 2,032 22218 CROLL CT 1979 4 3 2,352 22221 CROLL CT 1979 4 3 2,652 22222 CROLL CT 1979 4 3 2,324 22230 CROLL CT 1979 4 3 2,352 22233 CROLL CT 1979 4 2 2,002 22241 CROLL CT 1979 4 3 2,352 22244 CROLL CT 1979 4 3 2,652 1475 DEERFOOT DR 1979 4 3 2,652 1481 DEERFOOT DR 1979 4 3 2,352 1505 DEERFOOT DR 1979 4 3 2,652 1510 DEERFOOT DR 1979 4 3 1,934 1511 DEERFOOT DR 1979 6 3 2,330 1514 DEERFOOT DR 1979 4 3 2,352 1517 DEERFOOT DR 1979 4 3 2,652 1522 DEERFOOT DR 1979 4 3 1,934 1528 DEERFOOT DR 1979 4 3 2,352 1536 DEERFOOT DR 1979 4 3 2,652 1548 DEERFOOT DR 1979 4 2 1,780 1554 DEERFOOT DR 1979 4 . 3 2,652 1562 DEERFOOT DR 1979 4 3 1,934 1578 DEERFOOT DR 1979 4 3 2,352 1603 FOX GLEN DR 1971 4 3 2,165 1615 FOX GLEN DR 1968 4 3 2,205 1638 KIOWA CREST DR 1972 4 2 2,211 1640 KIOWA CREST DR 1972 4 2 2,340 1701 MENSHA CT 1972 3 2 1,474 1702 MENSHA CT 1972 2 2 1,620 1708 MENSHA CT 1972 4 2 1,881 Average 1968-1979 3.82 2.66 2,141 I sheet index I ARCHITECTURAL Pedods only used on one word obbievialions. If the abbreviation IS a different word by Itself, e.g. ARCH., BIT„ and LAM. team GENERAL NOTES abbreviations CONCEPTUAL SITE AND ROOF PLAN Periods are usually used when obbrevialing multiple words, urfess they project DEMOLITION PLAN genera PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN A2:12 are very common W Ihoul periods; e.g. AFF HVAC, R/A, and WWM. ROOF PLAN A3.00 SECTIONS B ANDFA OAT f FIRE ALARM FAS FASHNIERI PAR PARALLEL P PBD. PARIICUBOARD PROJECT NAME CANTU ADDITION& REMODEL NOIR: a CODER lBk FAU FORCEDAIRUMT PB. PUSH BUMN 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS ATTHE STIE AND ALL d TERM RPOUNDINUMBa F.B. FACEBRICK F.B.O. FURNISHED BY OTHERS PC. CONC. PRECASTCONCRETE PDR POWDER INCON55TENCES SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATI[MON OF ME OWNER, ENGINEER AND B. PROPERTY UNE F.D. FLOOR DRAIN PE PORCELAINaAME LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 1606 AND NUEVO DR ARCHITECT BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH WORK. 0 ROUNDID1AMUER F.E. FIREEANGUISHER Pat PMUATALsISM) - DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 AB. ,v+alozeai F.F. FINISH FLOOR NNq F.C. SHED PKG PARKING APN: 8293-022-014 2 ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS FOUND IN THESE DRAWINGS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO ENGINEER AND a ABV ABOVE FEL FIERGLAss n PLATE IHEGHB ARCHITECTS ATTENTION IMMEDIATELY. NC AIRCONWIxTNNG ACC ACCESS TN MEN RG RASH M PJAA. PLASTIC L WRATE Ptv pL,SSLgR 3. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS WRITTEN DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS. AC -F ACOUSHCN.TRE(CLGI FIR ROORINGI PNL PANEL AE AREA RAIHROOR R ROURESCe"BIGHT FN FENCE PM PAROTID) P.O.0 PONEOFCONNECTION 4. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF SND OR TO FACE OF FRAMING UNLESS OIHERWISENOTED. All ADD` DU ADD ADDEIVE ADH ADHESIVE ADl ADJUSTABLE FIND FOUNDATION F.O. F.O. FACEOF FACEOFSND PR FAIR (OF) PREFAB PREFABRICATED PSF POUNDSPERSQUABEFOOT i ALL TRUSS DRAWINGS TO BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER PRIOR TO AGO AGGREGATE IF FIREPROOF Pu POUNDS PEiSQUARE NCH ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT. AH.U. AIR HANDNG UNIT ALT ALTERNATE ALUMINUM � (DIING) PT PRRESSURRE TREATED [WOOD) OWNER: )AURA CANNLBFATRQftOREs 6, ALL OR EQUAL SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BESUBMTITID TO AND APPROVED BY CITY BUILDING OFFICIAL". ALUM ACCESS PANEL IS FS nlLLS� FULLS REINVENT PJ PAVEjDI ORPAVNG PVC POLYVNYLOTIGADE(rWq 1606 AND NUEVO DR PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. AP% APPROXIMATER FOOTIFEET PVMr PAVEMENT DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 ARCH' ARCHRECTTURAq MPH ASPIIAA RG FOOPNG TWO PLYWOOD PHONE (323) 6204859 AT. ASPHALTI➢E FUR FERDGIASS ��G q O.T. ouARRYTRE `1 CONTACT: LAURA CAM AU TO. AUTOMATIC AVE AVERAGE GA GAUGE R RISER EMAIL: Icantu@g.ucia.edu project information AWNING g GALV Gavmm (ONRAIRS) r RAG RENRNAJRGRBL -GAR 8A BATHROOM GARAGE G.B. GYPSUM PV HTFACTOR GRADED RTI. RUBBER WE RBELL LE BUILDING CODES: THE PROJECT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING: BD BOARD BF GRA TNG GD GRADED GRADING ED R.D. ROOF DRAW ARCHITECT/(FILE 24: amk STUDIO BIfdDI000R art. e1mMW0us I GD.e GARAGEDOOROPRO RE REFERENCE - 2152 Dupont Olive, Suite 240: E.G BLOCKING GR GR OUNDMULTNIERRUFFIR Rest REFRIGERATOR REG REGULAR IRVINE, CA 92612 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE (C.B.C.I 2010 EDITION BLDG NADING u GLASS OR GLABNG GLBK GLASS BLOCK RED REDNAED PHONE (?49) 86330W CALIFORNIA REiIDENML CODE (C.R.C.)2010 EDITION BTI'. BLOCK LCMu.) .NXBIOCANa GJ GALVAN®mON RES RESBIETIRESAWN CONTACT: ARLEINE EDJOURIAN CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL RUN BELOW GSM GALVANINDSHETTMETAL REV REV6IONI5). REVISED RR FMAIL•aed(oudan®amkSNDIO.COM LCO CODE. CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE (C.M.C.J 2010 EDITION GE GROUT GYP GYPSUM BIDDINGiCBTTHIS) CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE (C.P.C.)2010 ®180N" BM BENCHMARK GYP BD GYPSUMBOARD R.J.D. REWFORC®JVIICTION80% CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE (C.F.C.) 2010 EDITION BP BRASS PDOORI ERG SM04 DISK BRICK I,, -4TH 4TmGN (wool BIG RAMNG FILM RANGEWINCROWAVE - ALL APPLICABLE STATE AND is. BON 5106 I I FIB HmEw RM ROOM STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: mor Engineers LOCAL CODES. UNIT BASEMEU N.C. HOLLOW ORE R.O. ROUGH OPamIG ITO.W. PJGHTOFWAY 1401 DOVE Street, SURE 520 BSM OR BOT BOTTOM SIMM BETWEEN ND KB'ADOR KURD ND. HEATDAECTOR OR HEAVY DUTY NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 IDR. BUBTUPROOF TEAMi SouN $ sc 20'a CORE PHONE(949)502-5323 11) BM NYTiHW HOW HARDWARE No HEIGHT lDooRl SON SCHEDUIE CONTACT: KYLE MORRIS YS FILA HOLLOWMETAE SOSMOKEOEIECFOR EMAIL: kyte®morengineers.com OCCUPANCY GROUP: R3 CAB CABINET C Cl. CATCH BASIN HORS RoRDONTAL HR HOUR. SEC SECTION SERV SERVICE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: TYPEV-B CEA CEMENT HIS HORUGHTALSUDER SE SQUAB FEET CER CERAMIC ING HEATING IF.GL SAKEYGLSS OF CUBIC FOOT CHUM CKUMIER HVAC HEATNGNIHMIATING/AIR COND. [FWD HARDWOODTFLOORS) S.GD. SUDNGGIASSCOR SN SINGLEKRRLG0115HEFIVINGI CL CAST IRON BHT IDRAWNGI SHEET AREATABULATION: square faafages CJR.CONC CAR4H+ CONC SWAG SHEMHNG OR CIRCA ORC ORCUMFFRENCE ( ID. INSIDEDlAMMER LLO. NLHUOF SIM SUUUR SO. SKRNGHT E RESIDENCE 1,904 sf C.I. CONTROLIODIIORCON51RLICBON JWrt I.M.IINSIMTEJMEW SLOPE/SLIDING PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR ADDITION 324 Sf CK CALK�eNG)CAUIKBNG). CL aaSEtat CeTHttNE RLI OR WSUL BlSIM1®ORB6VUTR)N SM SEALANT SBP sK�FAFIO PALE PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR ADDITION 2.058 sf cLG CEILING CUR CLEAR(ANCET BT WL1;rOR TPC SPACER SPEC SPECNCARONs . - TOTAL LIVING AREA 4.290 sf GARAGE - 696sf CLOsTREIG OSE( IDOORI 1 AST JOW PMR OR ROOF) SPK sPEAKEROI CSM CERMAETTERM D Jolla SM. RAIRSSStED. E COVERED PATIO 463 st CMU CONCREEMASONRY UNI TD YNOOKDOWN (CELNG) SIO STANDMD SIGORSIID STIES (E)PORCH - 925f COL COIUMIL�NG - k PROPOSED STORAGE 44s; cOMB COMBNAII N CONC CONCRETE - Ko KNOCCKKOUT KFL KIC124Am(ONDOOR) SM STRUCTURAL 50 SQUAREPROPOSED BALCONY 233st CONN JAC)CONDOM KA; KNEESPACE SUI SUSPENDED S.W. SWEAR WALL PROPOSED REDUCED PORCH 60 st CoNR CONSTRUCOON CONT cot NUOUS SYM SYMBOL I L LENGTH CONTR CONTRACTORSIS SMOOTH FOUR ME L5 LAUNDRY SBP SINGLE SHELF I SINGLE POLE _ CORR CORRUGATED CPR. COFPat LTM LWMATEID) 2S&2P DOUBLE SKIFF I DOUBLE POLE COR CPT CARPET UV LAVATORY (SULK) - 2SIIP DOUBRESHRF/SINGLE POLE CRS COURSE41 LB.O. HOCATONBYONERS OR CORROSION RESURANT UV EWNG T TRFAD IATRAIRI)OR TRE TA TOWEL BAR CCSM.. CA�RONE LLP. LAMNA�FIASTC' TBD. MIEDETERMINED C.T. CERAMICHIE a RIGHT TC TERRACOTA CX C HER �� T.C.I. TERAP�(`GL M)O JOBT symbols CY CUBIC YARD - DIM WMINOUS LVL LAMVENEERLUMBER(BEAMS) TIG TONGUE Is. m 7BEHONE ELEVATION KEY OR SECTION KEY <�r— FLATCENNG 2X4 WOOD SND PARTITION UNEOF CBUNG BREAK �L l„L D DRymmDmN LW Loves NK NICK(NESS) TNR THRESHOLD DBL DOUBLE M METERO T.O.C. TOPOFCUR DECO DECORA7NE rr1 MA% MAKIMJM i.OF. 70POFFWNOATION DEMO OEA011516 DBAOIDKN! MAS MASONRY OFFOU DE DEPRESS MAX MATERIAL i.OM 70POFMASOtIXYSHEETNUMBER T.O.W. TOPOFWMOOW H�.....--JJ I �.• , I FLAT 5 2X6 WOOD SNDPAR111LON (y, -141,• SL SLOPED COLING DE DETAIL DF. DRINKING MOUNTAIN DH DOUBLE MNG MBA MASIFRBWN MBD MARERBEIROOM MEHNECI. 1R OR TRN TRANSOM HWNDOWI TP TOBEfPAPTHOID& N TEEVAION OIIIIETOR LOGTON H T T--.—� Lam.: 14:12 8- STARTING HEIGHT 2X0 WOOD SNOPARTIRON (. DOVER o6ENSIO CH METAL cA1 TED rrPLcv. DETAIL NUMBER OR SECTION KEY ,:'.I 1--I I DUG DIAGONAL DIM DISPOSAL MED - SHEETNUMBER PITCH MAY BE NOTED DIP DISPOSAL MFT MEW Moi. MANHOLENRat UC UNDERCUT U UN6 ® ® CONCRETE BLOCK HBGHFNOTED DN DEADER ON DOWN((STAIRS) LOAD DB. DAMP-PROOTNG MN MANHOLE MR MINOR MIC MISCElAHEOUi U.N.O. IRIlQSN07EDOIf®tWLSE UNLESS VB VANITY BASE V VA VAPORBARRBR WATER CLOSET CONCRETE O� DR DOOR DRY DRYER I@!!E MU) MOULDING MM M"JUJINt. VERT VERTICAL VEST VEIFOIE ANGLE �ii/� SHELF ABOVE DS DOWNISTA MMB MaABRANE VS Va EBLOCK DIS ORAWTU51ACK (CABNEI D.T. DETAIL E M.O.D MODULAYOPEa1G Moo MODULAR YLSNET VS WFM1SFBET VS. VEGTABIESNK ❑j NOTE NUMBER SOFFITABOVE DR MIT DW DISH WASIfBi MAB MARBLE MR METAL V.T. VNYLHRE V.T.R. V@TiHRUROOF NB/SHOWER DWG DRAWING DWR DRAWER MT MOU"N" WG) MULL MUINON FRM. A ® DIMENSIONAL LUMBER VV/ W WIDEIWASHINGMACKNEAWER REVISION NUMBER(DELTA) E EAR e EA EACH P-� N NORM WC WAIAR CLOSER EBEYEBROWTRATARCHI H K NTC NOTNCONIRACT HL WD WOOD WINDOW WOW WOW a BLOCKING EF. EACH FACE E.J. EA'AfaION TONT NG NAMRALGRAOE NUMBER WF WIDERAlT I7mBEAM) WH WA ER FA7et SHEETNUMBER cl (• b � FINISH GRADE WOOD LAVATORY EFA ELEVATIONONO AEC BECiRICRW) NTS. NOTIOSCALE M NOMINAL R WALLITUNG WWI OUGHTIRON SNCL ENCIDSURE WIC WANK-NCLOSET C— ELEVATION LEITER ER. EFCTI PATS. OA OVERALL W/W/o WINORWmIOUF mm PLYWOOD EO EQUAL FSi ESTIMATE EW.C. ELECTRIC WATER COOLER O ON OBSCURE GLASSI 0.4 ONCE♦ WP WATIRPROONINGI IRA WATER RESIRAM FARM ® DOUBLESINK ❑ ❑ EKG FASTING EKN WIMETT O.CAIL OVERHEAD CABINET OD. ONLDEDIAMEI& O.GON OVERHEAD GARAGE DOOR Ws. WATERSOREIEi WICK WAINSCOT W.T.W. WAINSC WALL SAND OR GRAVEL FILL INSULATED SHEATHING Da F%TBTgR WWF WEDEJWIREFABNC "M WaDO)WSREMBH ®BATTINSULATION OPNG OPMG ❑ SINGLESINK OPT OPRORW OSA OIIISmEA1R. BRICK ® RIGID INSULATION OSB ORNIEDRRANDBOARD I sheet index I ARCHITECTURAL CS INDEX, ABBREVIATIONS, SYMBOLS, AND GENERAL NOTES A1.10 CONCEPTUAL SITE AND ROOF PLAN A1.20 SITE PLAN A2.10 DEMOLITION PLAN A2.11 PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN A2:12 PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAM A2.20 ROOF PLAN A3.00 SECTIONS A3.10 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A3.11 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 10 DESIGN SHEETS cantu addition & remodel DIAMOND BAR, CA r U = m Q OU Q 0 ag ad 0 C/i LU 002 W 0 LL - 0 !1/ CD O Ica JOB No: 14139 PRO) MGR: KF DRAWN: EB CHECKED: Index, general notes, abbreviations & symbols CS 1 �000 �) / t 2'HIGH BLOCK '-W BOUGHT IRON E% N N .EING ABV (E)YUCCA TREES 27o r111% (E) SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING Legal Descripj�o gj 700 6gV911 –APN:8293-M-014 go dzA LOT 144 OF TRACT NO. 27979 70, 112. IN THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CA. RH 2— ZONING: RESIDENRAL-RL-LOW DENSITY. /Vill LOT AREA: 11,7305F. (E) A- WROUGHT IRON J) Existing Single Family Dwelling: 4 BEDROOMS & 3 BATHROOMS, ONE STORY 1964 SQUARE FEET 3 CAR PARKING GARAGE. STUCCO EXTERIOR. W, (E) PATIO COVER �P =Co, \� \' , site plan key EXISTING IST FLOOR am STUDIO (E) POOL& SPA PROPOSED BALCONY 707 177-71 PROPOSED IST FLOOR ADDITION N�?c\ rvv '�R --2 \' PROPOSED 2ND FLOOR ADDITION < < U PROPERTY LINE ^v I Z < ONE STORY ON THIS SIDE 0 02 02 06 (E) BLOCK WALL 0 -7 1 e HIGH a]i 0 U- r < 0 0 FIR z q\SI6GLH\A 01LYJ S1 EKCF\11` SE ¢o UJ C:> CID 10�0" v x JC D' �1 6 4''SE11' (E) SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING 0 4– XX 0 ft--- E D 4– APPROX. EXISTING D (3) CAR - OFF STREET 0 PARKING (E) PINE TREE 1011.00\ APPROX- (E) SINGLE FAM 1UJNG 0 –101 JE)ENTRY WALK 0fflj 0 7 Q -(- (E) DRIVEWAY 34.08' S77 JE) HEDGE 76bc - – ---- 00 40- 0 D - 0 L Z��- OF N 12'7 6 Conceptual Site Plan SCALE: I /W=11T'AT 27X34' SCALE: 1/16"=V -Y' AT 11"XIT' f reAsIons JOB NO: 14139 PADJ MGR: KF DRAWN. 8 CHECKED: conceptual site & roof plan A1.10 12 z ca U< C) V) z < 0 D c-6 4— M 0 OR >0 LU U- 0 z c) ca �2 O 75o 4- u E D Ln 0 0 00 ch c - revisions .. .: 14 39 PROJ MGR: KF B DRAWN. CHECKED. site plan STORAGE 5'-I I" II II it II FI II II II II II II II II II II 15'-10%2' I 1 I I 53'-8 21 II II Ii II II II ii II II II ii II II II II II II II f � 58365E 1 I 8066 SGD. �. -CLGBREAK I V I I O dining HARDSURFACE �0 kitchen VGLCLG HARDSURFACE T-T'CLG f f I._._.,._ _. _,_.1 __.,..... _. CIO BRFAK� 3 car garage EXPOSED CONC. -------------------- ih revisions 1616 OCT L family bath 3 HARDSURFACE / 91,CLG HARDSURFACE 9'-0" CLG 1668 2668 BI N,7 f -1 �w n L�I I L--'- - -- 3 car garage EXPOSED CONC. -------------------- II II II II II II II 5836 SL I revisions --------- demolillon plan wall legend 1 D 2X4EXISTING plan p 2X4 NEW 2X6 NEW A2.1 0 Q 2X8 NEW nItARD SURFACE I) U`a_�1Cl.G �� l bed 1CARP VOLc G II livin I I I I I II l HARDSURFACE VOL CLG I n,-> U"b"ath 2 I{ mARDF� SURFACE I I) 69'-T' 31'-9" 0 demolition pian notes I. DEMOUTION PIAN FOR REFERENCE ONLY. ALL DIMENSIONS SHALL BE HELD VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTORS OR SUBCONTRACTORS WHO WILL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR INSURING COMPLIANCE WITH ANY APPLICABLE CODE OR ORDINANCES. 2. MEPROJECT SHALL RECYCLE AND/OR SALVAGE THE MINIMUM AMOUNT OF NON -HAZARDOUS CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION DEBRIS AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH BY THE GOVERNING JURISDICTION. I (c: V U V) 0 4� II II II II II II II 5836 SL I revisions DRAWN: EB CHECKED: demolillon plan wall legend 1 D 2X4EXISTING plan p 2X4 NEW 2X6 NEW A2.1 0 Q 2X8 NEW nItARD SURFACE I) U`a_�1Cl.G �� l bed 1CARP VOLc G II livin I I I I I II l HARDSURFACE VOL CLG I n,-> U"b"ath 2 I{ mARDF� SURFACE I I) B'-rcC -' Jl bed 3 � so _ � 1 I I1 CARPET 8'vCLG 11 ��`'� -- - I hall= _ _,� YY I��CLG BREAK, HARDSURFACE L- 80 CLG I II II I�------- i L-- I I I I I entry li -II -�L-----� F__--------- HARDSURFACE 8-u'CLc I 1 I II II II bed 4 �l i' i, CARPET L-,LL_I bed 2 CARPET II I II II II I� ii \x it II II II li II II 69'-T' 31'-9" 0 demolition pian notes I. DEMOUTION PIAN FOR REFERENCE ONLY. ALL DIMENSIONS SHALL BE HELD VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTORS OR SUBCONTRACTORS WHO WILL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR INSURING COMPLIANCE WITH ANY APPLICABLE CODE OR ORDINANCES. 2. MEPROJECT SHALL RECYCLE AND/OR SALVAGE THE MINIMUM AMOUNT OF NON -HAZARDOUS CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION DEBRIS AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH BY THE GOVERNING JURISDICTION. I (c: V U V) 0 4� issue dale: 07a&2015 revisions JOB NO: 1/139 PROD MGR: KF DRAWN: EB CHECKED: demolillon plan wall legend 1 D 2X4EXISTING plan p 2X4 NEW 2X6 NEW A2.1 0 Q 2X8 NEW I II II it II II II li II II II Il II II II II Firqt Floor Plan SCALE: 1/4'�=V-Y'AT 22'X34' SCALE: 1/8"=1'-U'AT 11"Xi T JOB NM 14132 PRGJMGR: KF DRAWN: BE CHECKED. proposed first floor wall legend EZ3 2X4DEMO Ian 1 O 2X4 EXONG O 2X4 NEW [ZI 2X6 NEW U ED 2XB NEW Z on < OU V) Z< 0 0 0 Lu Z LL - u 0 '0 U.J ca c) 0.0 4- 4— V) c- 0 U 0 0 Q- (— JOB NM 14132 PRGJMGR: KF DRAWN: BE CHECKED. proposed first floor wall legend EZ3 2X4DEMO Ian 1 O 2X4 EXONG O 2X4 NEW [ZI 2X6 NEW A2.11 ED 2XB NEW 71'X" Proposed Second Floor SCALE: 114'=1'-0'AT27'X34' SCALE: 1/8'=IT'AT 11"X1 T' wall legend 2X40EMO 2X4 EXISTING O 2)(4 NEW 2X6 NEW mr.7-rg", V) 0 .4 JOB NO: 14139 PRaj MGR: KF DRAWN: EB CHECKED: second floor plan plan 1 A2.12 34'41' 3T -5y2' IT -1 1)/i' 10'-3" 4T' ----------------- balcony 6* -11" 4V 3 672 6-7" c N, b ISH I�A�M �M�M LH_ 6M SGD master suite open to attic CARPET 9-W CLG below V V Vol cig below \\ O ------- -------------- ------------------------ i / \ 3,,0„ / 4T' 4T' 4T' I / Z -V T-9" Zu, 295 ISH 31, SH I craft sto. i. 7111 FX ziiL i CARPET CUPPED CUS 201 2D14 �20LIFX 2DI4 FX bath 2 II w.i.c. CARPET I TILE -(rCLG j7� V4rCLG OPEN RAIL\ �.OD ------------------------ I! LOW CABINET -- ------- bed 4 4068 CARPET 94rCLG D x SOLATUBES 2668 office/ bed 6 CARPET bonus CARPET 9'-U'CLG CARPET 9'-D'CLG i 9-(r CLG bed 5 20 CARPET 9-WCLGII. bath,5, immmm=4 i s 305)5 204 FX AR(HMP X0 SIT -01SHS t-------- -------- --------- - --------- -------------------------------- ------------ -- - t ------------------------ ------ - -------- I 1 V -5y" 4•-0., 2!-9" T-81 N 6" Z-61 2, 1 7.7yj ,. 4'U' T 23- 2" 9'-10 0-21 24 71'-W Proposed Second Floor SCALE: 114'=1'-0'AT27'X34' SCALE: 1/8'=IT'AT 11"X1 T' wall legend 2X40EMO 2X4 EXISTING O 2)(4 NEW 2X6 NEW mr.7-rg", V) 0 .4 JOB NO: 14139 PRaj MGR: KF DRAWN: EB CHECKED: second floor plan plan 1 A2.12 I 79 w D 4- U V) O O) / Issue date: revWons 07-15-2DIS ...14139 DRMN. EB PROJ MGR: KF CHECKED: roof plan mne� SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS TO VERIFY TRUSS DIRECTION Building Section c Building Section b SCALE' 1/4'=IT'AT 27'X34' SCALE: 1/4!=-1T'AT 22'X34' SCALE: 11/9�=V-WAT 11"XIT' SCALE. 1/9'�VOAT I I"XIT' SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS TO VERIFY TRW DIRECTION BATH 2 W.I.C. BED 2 FFL aBEIM 11 U PL . ....... J1 1H 1) BATH 3 STE (E) KITCHEN (E) LIVING HALL .............. E ..... ..... . -------------- I- Building Section a SCALE: 1/4'�=V-WAT 27'X34' SCALE: I /&'=V-Y'AT I I'M 7' section notes II SPACES WITHIN THE STRUCTURE. REEFER TO STRUCTURAL BEI BATH 5 7. 11 BATH 511 FR ROOFING: E0 PITCHED ROOF AT 3.75:12 SLOPF, U.N.O. SEE ROOF PIAN, DETAILS, AND GENERAL NOTES. WOOD FLOORS: AT TYPICAL INTERIOR CONDITIONS FLOOR SHEATHING OVER FLOOR JOIST. REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. CONCRETE SLABS / CURBS: SEE PERIMETER DIMENSIONAL PLAN. 25 R MASTER SUITE INSULATION: REFER TO T-24 REPORTS WffH4N THIS SET. W.I.C. GUEST RM[ BATHN FFL J 4.3 VAULTED CEILING: R-30 BATTS 4.4 FLOOR OVER GARAGE' R-19 BATTS KNEE WALLS BETWEEN ATTIC AND LIVING SPACES: R-19 BATTS FLOOR OVER CRAWLSPACF- R-19 BATTS Building Section c Building Section b SCALE' 1/4'=IT'AT 27'X34' SCALE: 1/4!=-1T'AT 22'X34' SCALE: 11/9�=V-WAT 11"XIT' SCALE. 1/9'�VOAT I I"XIT' SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS TO VERIFY TRW DIRECTION BATH 2 W.I.C. BED 2 FFL aBEIM 11 U PL . ....... J1 1H 1) BATH 3 STE (E) KITCHEN (E) LIVING HALL .............. E ..... ..... . -------------- I- Building Section a SCALE: 1/4'�=V-WAT 27'X34' SCALE: I /&'=V-Y'AT I I'M 7' section notes E-A.L � u ct En Lao C: < C) < co < U a) 0 02 ::E =) ¢Q C,5 0 0 LL - 0114 z < 10 UJI O C).0 4— U E Ln 0 0) U .0 L- C -0 —0 D- (- Issue date: U7-15-2015 revtstons JOB NO. 14139 PAW MGR: KF DRAWN: EB CHECKED: building sections plan 1 A3.00 A. BUILDING SECTIONS SHOWN HERE DEPICT VOLUME SPACES WITHIN THE STRUCTURE. REEFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS, DETAILS, AND CALCULATIONS BY OTHERS FOR ALL STRUCTURAL INFORMATION. ROOFING: E0 PITCHED ROOF AT 3.75:12 SLOPF, U.N.O. SEE ROOF PIAN, DETAILS, AND GENERAL NOTES. WOOD FLOORS: AT TYPICAL INTERIOR CONDITIONS FLOOR SHEATHING OVER FLOOR JOIST. REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. CONCRETE SLABS / CURBS: SEE PERIMETER DIMENSIONAL PLAN. REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. INSULATION: REFER TO T-24 REPORTS WffH4N THIS SET. Pl. 4.1 EXTERIOR WALLS: R-19 BATTS 42 COUNGWITHATTICABOVE.- R -3D BATTS 4.3 VAULTED CEILING: R-30 BATTS 4.4 FLOOR OVER GARAGE' R-19 BATTS KNEE WALLS BETWEEN ATTIC AND LIVING SPACES: R-19 BATTS FLOOR OVER CRAWLSPACF- R-19 BATTS 5.1 FIRE PROTECTION: THE PRIVATE GARAGE SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM THE DWELLING UNIT ANDffS ATTICAREA PL BY MEANS OF A MINIMUM I/7(12.7 MM) GYPSUM BOARD APPLIED TO THE GARAGE SIDE. GARAGES BENEATH HABITABLE ROOMS SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM ALL HABITABLE ROOMS ABOVE BY NOT LESS THAN A 5/8' TYPE X GYPSUM BOARD OR EQUIVALENT. 5.2 BENEATH STAIRS AND LANDINGS: SPACES UNDER STAIRWAYS SERVING AND CONTAINED WITHIN A SINGLE RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNIT IN SHALL BE PERMITTED 70 BE PROTECTED ON THE ENCLOSED SIDE WITH I IT GYPSUM BOARD. EL E-A.L � u ct En Lao C: < C) < co < U a) 0 02 ::E =) ¢Q C,5 0 0 LL - 0114 z < 10 UJI O C).0 4— U E Ln 0 0) U .0 L- C -0 —0 D- (- Issue date: U7-15-2015 revtstons JOB NO. 14139 PAW MGR: KF DRAWN: EB CHECKED: building sections plan 1 A3.00 "MEDITERRANEAN" Rear Elevation SCALE: 1 /4"=1'-0" AT 22X34" SCALE:1/8"=1'-0'AT 1I"XiT' Pl. PL i�. 8 al r I�II81 0 '{i o U Q U� Z "N Z U Q 0 C2 Q Q _I -1- w 002 w 0 =1 Z l N U ¢Q om 4J O y= � 4-0 -1-- U 011— "' O U c- O C 4- 0FR exterior elevation notes A. REFER TO GENERAL NOTE SHEER FOR TYPICAL REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS. B. WINDOW"HEAD"HEIGHTS: -1ST FLOOR =B'-0" U.N.O.ON EXT. ELEVATIONS -DOOR HEIGHTS AS NOTED ON PLANS. )ALIGN ADJACENT WINDOW HEADER HEIGHT WITH DOOR HEADERS.) C. EXTERIOR WALLS: -STUCCO PER GENERAL NOTES, CORROSION RESISTANT WEEP SCREED AT BASE D. EXTERIORSOFRIS: -STUCCO PER GENERAL NOTES. E. ROOFING: -Cl/SS'A'FIRERETARDANT ASPHALT SHINGLES. PER GENERAL NOTES. SEE ROOFING DETAILS FOR FASCIAS.. COLOR AND FINISH TO MATCH EXISTING F. WINDOWS: -VINYL WINDOWS PER GENERAL NOTES, DIVIDED UIES WHERESHOWN ON EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS. G. ENTRY DOORS: -RAISED PANEL PER GENERAL NOTES AND AS SELECTED BY OWNER. H. DOOR AND WINDOWTRIM: FIBERCEMENT TRIM WITH WOOD GRAIN FINISH, PER GENERAL NOTES. SEE DETAILS ELEVATION KEY NOTES n1 FIBER CEMENT TRIM PER GENERAL NOTES, 1X3 U.N.O. O FIBER CEMENT TRIM PER GENERAL NOTES, 3X3 U.N.O. ❑3 CORROSION RESISTANT SCREEN LOUVERED VENT. 12X24" U.N.O. CORROSION RESISTANT ROOF TO WALL FLASHING. SEE ROOF DETAILS, RESAWNWOODBRACE AND/OR BEAM. SEE DETAILS �6 SPACED DECKING W/ WROUGHT IRON RAILING ❑2 EXISITING WROUGHT IRON POOL FENCING EB STUCCO COVERING EXISTING BRICK COLUMNS �... � � issue ao�e: maszns ®a 0o 00 ®ffn M11® ®ID OEM 110 [m ED JOB NO. 14139 PHOT MGH: KF DRAWN: EB CHECKED: exterior elevations "MEDITERRANEAN" Front Elevation SCALE: 114'=] *-U'AT 22"X34" SCALE :I/8"=F-G'ATIF%1T' plan 1 A3.10 "MEDITERRANEAN" Right Elevation SCALE: 1 /4"=V -W AT 27X34" SCALE: 1 /3"=1'-0" AT 1l')(17' "MEDITERRANEAN" Left Elevation SCALE: 1 /4"-1'-0" AT 27'X34" SCALE: 1/6'=V -VAT I FVT' FFL exterior elevation notes A. REFER TO GENERAL NOTE SHEETS FOR TYPICAL REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS. B. WINDOW'HEAD"HEIGHTS: -1ST FLOOR =B'-0" U.N.O. ON EXF. ELEVATIONS -DOOR HEIGHTS AS NOTED ON PLANS, )ALIGN ADJACENT WINDOW HEADER HEIGHT WITH DOOR HEADERS.) C. EXTERIOR WALLS: -STUCCO PER GENERAL NOTES, CORROSION RESISTANT WEEP SCREED AT BASE D. EXTERIORSOFFTIS: -STUCCO PER GENERAL NOTES. E. ROOFING: -CLASS'A' FIRERETARDANT ASPHALTSHINGLES. PER GENERAL NOTES. SEE ROOFING DETAILS FOR FASCIAS. COLOR AND FINISH TO MATCH EXISTING F. WINDOWS: -VINYL WINDOWS PER GENERAL NOTES, DIVIDED UTESWHERESHOWNON EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS. G. ENTRY DOORS: -RAISED PANEL PER GENERAL NOTES AND AS SELECTEDBY OWNER. H. DOOR AND WINDOW TRIM: -FIBERCEMENT TRIM WITH WOOD GRAIN FINISH, PER GENERAL NOTES. SEE DETAILS ELEVATION KEYNOTES ❑1 FIBER CEMENT TRIM PER GENERAL NOTES. IX3 U.N.O. a FIBER CEMENT TRIM PER GENERAL NOTES. 3X3 U.N.O. CORROSION RESISTANT SCREEN LOUVERED VENT. 1272-17 U.N.O. ❑CORROSION RESISTANT ROOF TO WALL 4 BASHING. SEE ROOF DETAILS. RESAWN WOOD BRACE AND/OR BEAM. SEE DETAILS © SPACED DECKING W/ WROUGHT IRON RAIUNG El EXISTING WROUGHT IRON POOL FENCING ❑B STUCCO COVERING EXISTING BRICK COLUMNS EA P$a 009 m�£3 °nm vm 49 in0� VCyi a) U ^� d C) W ci�~ ¢Z oU Q � ag 06 -4— w Ock� W 0 = LJ_ Z U N 0 Q< V)om O O c)o U E 0 F- O 0) U O O Q(_ Issue dale: 07-15-1D15 revisions JOB NO: 14139 DRAWN: B PROJ MGH: KF CHECKED: exterior elevations pIan 1 A3.11 V sheet index Periods only used on one wad abbreviations. R the obbreviolion different team INDEX, ABBREVIATIONS, SYMBOLS, AND -' abbreviations Priodsoreusuollyusedwhenableevlolingm tppllewords,unleSSlhey project SITE PLAN A2.10 general A2.11 are very common without periods: e.g. AFF, HVAC, R/A, and !nm— A2.12 PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAM A2.20 ROOF PLAN & ANp F FA MEAIARM - PAR PARAIIR p PBD. PATH HE BOARD PROJECT NAME CANTU ADDITION & REMODEL EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS NOTES: g AT 1 CENTS FAS FASIOIIEti I FAIT mucED WHO Pt. Pusxaund+ I. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS AT THE SITE AND ALL O PERM FACEBRICK PC CONC. PRECAST CONCRETE PDR POWERS INC CES SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER. ENGINEERAND R POUND/NUMBER R PROPERTY UNE FB.o. FURNSIODBYOINEPS le FD.BOOR DRAM P.E. MRCEUN ENAMEL LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 1606 ANO NUEVO DR ARCHITECT BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH WORK. 0 ROUNDMINVETER FEMEEXINGUITO DOOR NO PEDESTAL IA NK) PDN PEMMEIER DIAMOND BAR, 91765 , 2 ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS FOUND IN THESE DRAWINGS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO ENGINEER AND AB ANCHOR BOLT FF. FINISH JUNE) F.G. THEREDORNGE PKG PARKING ATN: 8293-022-014 ARCHITECTS A7rMON IMMEDIATELY, a AS ABOVE NC NRCONNIIORNG FOL MERG LIN FINISH Pt Pur BLOGNFI P.WA. PV611CLAMINATE 3. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS WRITTEN DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS. ACC ACCESS ACT. ACOUSTICALTRE1CLGL RG FLASHNG RR FLOORINGI pus PIMIER PALL PANEL AR ABOVE RN15N 0.00R ft ftOURESCEM IWxB PM PARRIED) 4. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE 70 FACE OF STUD OR TO FACE OF FRAMING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. AD. ARUORATI ADD ADDENDUM R, RNCB ENO FOUR ARON P.O.C. Pam OFCANNECIION PR PAIR tell ADH ADHESIVE E.O. FACE OF PREFAB PREFABRICATED 5. ALL TRUSS DRAWINGS TO BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER PRIOR TO ADI ADRISTABIf AGG AGGREGATE F.05. FACEOFSTU° EP FIREPROOF PST POUNDS PER SGUARE FOOT PA POUNDSPERSOVAREINCN ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT. AH.U. MHANDLINGUNR ALL ALTERNATE FIL FIREPLACE FR rRAMEIDIN+G) PD1 PARTITION P.I. PRESSURE TREATED( -MDT OWNER: LAURA CANTU&BEATRQ FLORES 6. ALL OR EQUAL SUB5IITUTIONS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY CITY BUILDING OFFICIAL NUM NUNINUM ISFULLSQE PV PAVERROR PAVING 1606 ANO NUEVO OR PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. AP. ACCESS PANEL AP% APPROXIMATE Is, FULL SCREW Von R POOT/REI WCCHLORIDE"EI PVMI PAVEMENT DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 ARCH. ARCHRECRUFRAL) RG FOOLING PWD PLYWOOD PHONE (323) 620.2859 MPH ASPHALT AT. ASPHALT TBE FUR FUFREDINGI FX flYEDGUSS o.r. oum"TuE q CONTACT: LAURA CANAL �'''\ t information Auto AUTOMATIC " i EMAIL IConIU®g.UCIO.DdU ( ) ro e c project AVE AVERAGE g GA GAUGE GNV GALVAMID) r R RGERLON STAIRS) 1 RAG RENEN AIRGRI. �/ AWN, AWAITS GAR GARAGE Rif. RUBBER BASE BUILDING CODES: THE PROJECT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING: L.� kJ GA GYPSUM IN'ALLI BOARD RAD S °A+ RU BD BOARD G.C. GDIERALCOMRACIOR R.D. ROOF pRNN ARCHBEWMLE 24: amk5TUD10 BY uFaLoNooRI N, NNAKING GD GRADE OMPADING TSD.H GARAGEDOORROPENER REF REFERENCE REFIT RERUGERATOR 2752 Dupont Drive, SLdie 240 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE IC.B.C.)20I3 EDITION BLKG BLOCKING GN GROUND FAI4I B+RORUPIER OR CALVING REG REGULAR IRVINE, 92612 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE (C.R.C.)2013 m010N BtDc BUIDNG GL GLASS GLBK. GLASS ROCK REQ REQUIRED PHONE: (949) 863-3000 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE (C.EC.) 2013 EDITION BtK BLOCK ICMUq Betty GI. GALVANUEDRON RES RESBEM/RESAWN NTSI.I�m CONTACT: ARLENE EDJOURIAN CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE. (C.M.C.) 2013 EDITION BROKING GSM GAIVAN1iED5HRI MET& or GROUT 'OFF R NFO EMAIL: aedjourionB'omkSTUDIO.COM CALIFORNIA PLUMBING COPE. (C.P.C.) 2013 EDITION SM BEAM 0M BENCHMARK BP BMASS(DOORI Or GYPSUMTLB. GYP 80 GYPSUM BOARD NG ROOHNG ReNFORCEDIm+rnol+eoz RG RAIIJNG CALIFORNIA HIRE CODE (C.F.C.) 2013 EDITION CALIFORNIAENERGYCOOE20TADRDS BRG BEARING ASH IZMXiN IWALLI R RANGE W/MICROWAVE &M GCALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS. (CALGreen)2013 EDBION BILK BRICK h B5. BoiHSIDES UNIT BASEWNT NSI HOSE BIBB N.C. HOUOWCORE - RM ROOM Be, ROUGH OPENING R.O.W. rnGMawAT STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: mor Engineers 1401 Dove Street, Suite 520 ALL APPLICABLE STATE AND LOCAL CODE. BIM OR 501 BOTTOM W HUOOR HARD H.D. HEAT DE7ECIOR OR HEAVY DUTY NEWPORT BEACH. CA 9266D ED- BETWEEN B.UR Butrupl? F HDR HEADER S SOUTH S PHONE: (949) 502-5323 BVL BEVEL HOW HARDWARE SC SOLID COAE IDOORI CONTACT: KYLE MORRIS B.W. BOTH WAYS HOT It an RIA HOLLOWMELAL SCH SCHEDULE SD 5MOKEDRECTOR EMAIL kyle@Smorengineers.com OCCUPANCY GROUP: R -3/U-1 CAB CABINET C MORE NO AL HR HOUR SEC SECTION SERV SERVICE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: TYPE V -B C.B. CATCH BARN CEM CEALEIn IG HOPSIOMAI SWOT SF. SQUARE FEET HIG HURNG SF.GL SAFETY GLASS CER CERAMIC a CUBIC FOOT HVAC HEATRIG/VENMIING/AIR COAD. S.GD. AIDiNGG1ASSDOOR AREA TABULATION: CHANT CHAMFER HAD IURDw00DInco Si SH ANGLE HUNG OR SHEFIVINGI Cl. C/Ai IRON CJ.P.CONC CASI4NPUCECON SM (DRAwNG)SHgr SHRUG SHEARING .K y square I OOIC�ges . OR CIRCLE CIRC CIRGUARE ENCE ) ID. NEIDEDLAMflER L.O.LIN HOT OF SAB SWEAR SKL SKTUGHI LE RESIDENCE 1.904 51' PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR ADDITION 301 sl C -L CONTROL JOINT OR CONSTRUCTION JOINT SL SLOPEISIDING uAL RuvurenMRN CK CLOSET CANTTERUN INS OR NSUL UISUTAIEDORIMUUFIDN SM SEALANT S&P SHWANDPOLE PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR ADDITION 1.790 sf CL CLOSET OR CEFUDtUM CLOT COEDITS IM NIEIBOR SPC SPACER TOTAL WING ARTA 3.995 sf CIS CLOSURE CEI SPEC SPECIFICATIONS SPY. SPEAKERISI (EIGARAGE 6965( CLS CLOSURE OR CLOSER IDOORI CM CENLIME7ERp) JP JOGI IROOROR RDON n Jdln $37. STAINIESSSTEL (E) COVERED PATIO 417s( GWCONCREIEMASO, RYUNIT Sm STANDARD SIG OR SID SIERAGE (E) PORCH ILO BE REMODELED) 99 �T C.O. CASED OPEMNG k cot CaBMI+ 1� mLLcRGL Re KNOCKmI+ AR m � PROPOSED IIORAGE AT GARAGE 55 sr COMB CONHINATI RUCHE" to KNOCKOUT 374 STRUCTURAL' PROPOSED REDUCED PORCH 59 s1 Mike CONCRETE KPI gCKRATE TON DOOR) SG BOWIE SHE SUSPENDED SCOPE Of WORK: ADD SECOND FLOOR TO EXISTING SINGLE STORY RESIDENCE. ADD COW JAC)CONDEHSER K/5 KNEE SPACE S.W. SHEAR WNL COILR Co CONT COOK UOUS L IEi+TSTH GYM SYMBOL COMP CONIRAMOR I U IAUWRY SIS SINGOSHELFISING 5&P SINGIESMED /SNGLEPOLE STORAGE AT IXISONG GARAGE CORR CORRUGATED UM IAMINASEIDj RS&RP DO UIRESHELF/bOUBIEME CPR COPPER UV UVAIOAY IANKI 2581P DOUBIESHELF/SINGLE POLE COR CPI CARPET CRS Cou"GE01 CR CORROSION RESISTANT Ue.LOCATION BY OTHERS tN UIBNG 4. IREADJARNRSIORTRE CVAs CASEMENT LL UVEMAO I 15. CST-CASSSTONE LP, LAAKNATdI PLASTKC r9.D, 10 EDEIERMNED FUR C, CD RORCOURIER U. LAUNDRY IUB IT ULNTE r.CJ. TROWEIMCONLROLIOR 'y�'I'�1 s y b o l s CK CONCEMNENECROC N CY CIIBICYARD LN HUM LUMINOUS TEMP, iDAPO50IGv,SSI T&G 701IMEL ROOVE 1 , 1 dLVR F...i ORAw tV1 LAM VENEER LUMBER (REAMS) LOWER IR TELEPHONE MC TRICKNEii THR lop F—� 2%4 WOOD STUD PARTITION FLAT COLING L DOVE E DBL DOUBLE DECO OECOItATFVE LTi M MAXIM) MAX MAXIMUM OF CURB 1.001. TOP OF CURB KEY OR SECTION KEY � UNE OF COLING BREAK DEMO DEMOLISH. DEMOLITION DEP DEPRESSED M& MASONRY /MIL MATERUL i0 . IOP a iOIINOALION 7.OM. IwoFMAsoM+r R.O.W. SELEVATIONETNUM SHEET NUMBER , 2X6 WOOD STUD PARTITION FLAT � '4.�2y 5L STARTINGOPED LUNG DEI DETAIL MBA MANER BATH iR ORi MPM0FWIWOW LWINOOW 100 9' 4:1 STARRING HEIGHT DF, DAINKBRGMUMAN off DOUBLE HUNG oIAKB ouMRm MBO FALMUER BEDROOM MC MEMICNECANNET MECH MEctlArRCk IF iP DREVISAPERHemER PA trr ttp�m°N °InIET°R L°uR°N , r1\ \DETAIL NUMBER OR SEC00N KEY - ���07 WOOD STUD PARTITION I T I )— PITCH MAY NOTED DAG OAGON& DIM Mm METAL MM METAL UWNISHED OeRI SHEET NUMBER ® T E CONCRETE BLOCK HEIGHT NOTED D5FOSAON DEEP aSPOSN MFR MANHOLE ER UNT U UNP UNFINISHED OR pNEAIER DL DEADLOAD ON DOWN (SIM) M11 MANHOLE .1 MIINNJM NIR MIRROR LINO. UN'LE[S N0IEDOUfOWOE KE VANn. WE '\9' - CONCRETE O WATER CLOSET D.P. DAMP TING MGC AUCEUAAMUs V VD. VAPOR BARRIER ANGLE DR DOOR DRY DRYER MACHINE MID MOUHDRIG AUL MIJUNETER VESi V6iBtA SHELF ABOVE DS DOWIISPOUI D/S DRAWER SIACKICABMET) D.T.n DELM.RLE MMB MEAU, TE MO. MMONRY OPENING MOD M M VEMEDFRI9E BLOCK VN vNNLSHEET VS. VPDLTL ESNK ❑j NOTE NUMBER ® SOFFR ABOVE DR DR MRB MARBLE MARBLE V.T. VLMtUtE DWC,H WAS)ER DAG DRAWING MIL METALV.T.R. AD MouNTEERRIGIDIMENSIONAL VDi7THRUROOr IUB/SHOWER LUMBER 0 R DRAWER MillMWIONORMIIALED WAREVISION W WIDE/MACINE/WEN NUMBER(DELTAI E FAST e EA EACH n N NORM Ntc. NAMBLE iRAa WC WA7ERCLOSETCHOSEr WIND BLOCKING T. EACHFA LM7ARCNI EF. EACHFAC[ O NAB RM NO NANRN GRADE OW WDM WINDOW WF WIDE MAGEISTEfl BEM1) WH WAR O $REFI NUMBER LAVATORY E-1. EXPANSION Ia. REV ELEVATION NO NUMBER NOM NOMINAL RHEATER W.H. WALL HUNG d I' b FINISH GRADE WOOD ELEC EUCTRICTAti WCL DICLOSURE E.P. EIECIRICAL PANEL N.T.S. NOTTOSCAE WE ROUGINIRON WIC WALK4NCMSET w/W/O WITH OR WRMOUr C—ELEVATION lE1tER PLYWOOD EO EQUAL O MEST OA, OVERALL OBS OBSCURE IGLASSI WP WAIERPROa11NGI DOUBLE SINK EQUAL. EW.C. ELECTRIC WATER COCKER O.C. ON CFM R WR WARRROOTIN WS. WATERS TURNER ® INSULATED SHEATHING E.G OESTBIG O.CM. OVERHEAD CABINET WSO WAINSCOT EAT Ez RIOUR OT OD. OUTAOE o"MEHR O.G.D. ovERxEADGARnGE DDDR W.R.W. WALL IO WALL —F W11MOWREFABRIc SAND OR GRAVEL FILL ® BAMNSULATION OROVERHEAD °PNC OVERNG WWM WEEDED WIRE MESH SINGLE SINK On SIDE! OSA OUTSIDE ® BRICK RIGID INSULATION OSB ORIWIEO STST RAND BOARD sheet index ARCHITECTURAL CS INDEX, ABBREVIATIONS, SYMBOLS, AND GENERAL NOTES A1.10 CONCEPTUAL SITE AND ROOF PLAN A1.20 SITE PLAN A2.10 DEMOLITION PLAN A2.11 PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN A2.12 PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAM A2.20 ROOF PLAN A3.00 SECTIONS A3.10 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A3.11 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A3.12 MASSING STUDY 11 ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS / TOO NO: !1134 CROCKED: KF DRAWN: ® CHECKED: index. general notes, abbreviations & symbols CS -Iwo-oo--�� 1011.00 ACING ABV (E)YUCCATRES C T No 2 �-iTHIGH BLOCK COJ3. WROUGHT IRON '79 JE) SINGLE FAMILY DWEING Legal Description: If g g \\LOT 144OFTRACTNO.27979 3.4 1010 IN THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CA. .0 ZONING: RESIDENTIAL -RL -LOW DENSITY. LOTAREA: 11,730SF. x P4-WROUGHTIRON 0 .1 EAsting Single Family Dwelling: 4 BEDROOMS & 3 BATHROOMS. ONESTORY 1904SQUAREFEEr 3 CAR PARKING GARAGE STUCCO DMIOR. (E) PATIO COVER site plan key I �dq EXISTING IST FLOOR am STUDIO 19 POOL& SPA 51 , , M\ PROPOSED 1ST FLOOR ADDITION -IV26 52`1�1 PROPOSED 2ND FLOOR ADDITION o0b 01 <� N72 -16,7 9,11V Dz:z 0 6 Conceptual Site Plan Ej SCALE: I /8"=1'-0" AT 27'A34" 7n- "I zrAi r. 1/14%-l'JY'AT I l"Y17" A1.10 OU 0 CZ :2 < Z3 D pi 4— Uj Ow �j 0 =:) 1 Z LL - tV 0 z < ,0 UJ 6 Ca O qL O C- 0 E 4- D Ln 0 C- 0 '0 C) C - issue date: revisl ns 01-M2DIS JOB NO: 14139 DMw a PPDJ MGFI, ff- CHECKED. conceptual site & roof plan A1.10 1 b3 D c— V) 0 MVM- CKMDB M site Pi.. A1.20 A Ar D c— V) 0 MVM- CKMDB M site Pi.. A1.20 STORAGE 5-11" demolition plan notes I. DEMOLITION PLAN FOR REFERENCE ONLY. --- ----------�- -x I ALL DIMENSIONS SHALL BE FIELD VERIFIED BY SUBCONTRACTORS THE CONTRACTORSBE BREAK WHO WILL BESOLELY R6PONSBIE FOR SOLELY R NSUR04G COMPLIANCE WITH ANY II II Ii APPLICABLE CODE OR ORDINANCES. II II LI 2 THE PROJECT SHALL RECYCLE AND/OR SALVAGE nFi A7SURFACE it II THE MINIMUM OFI US I I I I I CONSTRUCTIONMOUNT AND DEMOUIIONN RISAND I I I I 69'-T 1 I IN COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS SET FORDS pppAqp BY THE GOVERNING JURISDICTION.HS m� dining HAACE i =� o � bed 1 II am STUDIO V� kitchen VOLCLG LI I1 li CARPE I I � I I voLaG I I I I I I I i sB9BSL , I ,;oaascD 6e36st _ --- ----------�- -x I CLG BREAK .1 I nFi A7SURFACE it II U\V.0CLGG; lI I m� dining HAACE =� o � bed 1 II am STUDIO V� kitchen VOLCLG CARPE I I � I I voLaG I I LA ARDSURTEACE T-CLG I ry I I ( � I � livin I I II V RARDSURFACE VOLCLG I I I1 I I II - - - CLG BREAK 0C) J U\bath 2 RD•t�A SURFACE I I (TVCLG < Q ,Bldocr '-'.. family bed 3 �� / III 4 p 06 bath 3 HARDSURFACE BffCLG I - CARPET - r __ B'�CLG iii srEP . _ 1= _ Q W EIR HA��URGCE 1668 - -- \\ IIS OUJ abbey ` Z W v 1 hall == __,� o Z �Q--_-- Un� R-CLGBEAK I DSI Q ---~--- ----- �_ O Co entry II \HA-R-UUR—FryiCE -a--jL 77 , �o HARDSURFACE KCLG II li II11 // II i r H.I bed 4 JJ� ii bed 2 Ii CARPE I L -L-I I CARPET _ O ------ �' a, -(r CLG !-?fes I) 5 xc6 II 3 car garage i I If �I Ij I I ;I I I 'F— U E � EXPOSED CONC. N LTJ. _�__ ---JJ N c 0 xI' II L ________ ___________. --------- II O c/-)� 0 II issue dale: It -2&2116 3V-1 1" 311-9" JOBND: 14199 WWJNDR KF DRAWL B CHECKED: demolition plan 69'-T' wall legend C,n 2R4 DEMO 0 2X4 EXISTRIG plan 1 0 2X4 NEW DRB NEW ALn/ O Q DRB NEW .1 1 T i l i t i 1 1 I i i i t I l i i i i i i i i t a d 4eb c INTERIOR ELEVATION KEY THESE CALCULATIONS ARE FOR THE ARCHITECTS USE ONLY AND ARE NOT ����ed First Floor Plar SCALE: 1 /4"=] T' AT 22'X34" SCALE: 1 /8" -V -Y' AT 11 "X 1 T wall legend C= 2X4 DEMO O 2X4 EXISTING D 2X4 NEW 177 1 2X6 NEW ,%i 2XB NEW mQ oC) Z Q �Q 0 J 06 fo N LU 0 62 W 0 7' LL Z N Z0:� QQ CD no issue dale: .01-2&M]6 revisions / JOBN0: 14134 PROJMOR: XF DRAWN: B3 CHECKED: proposed first floor plan 1 A2.11 A �99 econd Floor wall legend rz:i WDEMO = 2X4 BU'nNG C= 2X4 NEW E3 2X6 NEW MI/I 2XBNEW t; A �issue date: 01�2$M16 evisions — r JOB NO. 14139 PRDJ MOM KF DRAM B CK-CKED-. second floor plan plan 1 - A2.12 SCALE: 1W=1'-9'AT27X34!' SCAI F: 1/9�-]T'AT 117117' Q) U O C) 70 < Z Z z O 0 IL ag 0 0 0LL- 0114 z Q:f C) ccl O 0 4-- c 0 4- cn 0 0 14— U-0 CL c– issue dale: 01-28*DH —Ww, JOB N(Y. 14139 DRAWN: B PRWYrAKF CHECKED. root plan plan 1 A2.20 Building Section c SCALE: 1/4"=1 T' AT 22"X34" SCALE 1/8"=1'-(Y'AT 11"X17" PL m FH. _ Building Section b SCALE 1 /4 1' 0" AT 27'X34" SCALE 1/8"=1'-O"AT 11717" Building Section a SCALE 1/4"=1'-0" AT M(34' SCALE 1/8'�=]T'AT 11"X17" a= omega E'.o Sum' �N�EPg ¢Z ov Z a o� � W 022 w 0 = td_ Z t::! z ck� Q Q ,o LU O cin �2 issue date: 01.2&2016 revisions IF JDB N0: 14139 PAW MGP: 0 DRAWN: ® CHECKED - building sections plan 1 A3.00 section notes - A BUILDING SECTIONS SHOWN HERE DEPICTVOLUME SPACES WITHINTHE STRUCTURE REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS, DETAILS, AND CALCULATIONS BY OTHERS FOR ALL STRUCTURAL INFORMATION. ROOFING: Qj PITCHED ROOF AT 3.75:12 SLOPE. UN.O. - SEE ROOF PLAN. DETAILS, AND GENERAL NOTES. WOOD FLOORS: AT TYPICAL INTERIOR CONDITIONS: FLOOR SHEATHING OVER FLOOR JOIST. REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. CONCRETESLABS / CURBS: 3� SEE PERIMETER DIMENSIONAL PLAN. REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. INSULATION: REFER TO T-24 REPORTS WM44N THIS SET. PL 4.1 EXTERIOR WALLS: R•19 BATTS 4© CEWNG.WITHATBC ABOVE R-30 BATTS 4.3 VAULTED CEILING: R30 BATTS 4.4 FLOOR OVER GARAGE: R-19 BATTS S' 45 KNEE WALLS BETWEEN ATTIC ANDUVINGSPACES: R-19 BATTS 4.6 FLOOR OVER CRAWL SPACE R•19 BATTS 5.1 FARE PROTECTION: THE PRIVATE GARAGESHALL BESIBARATED FROMME DWELLING UNITAND ITS ATTIC AREA PL BY MEANS OFA MINIMUM 1/2' 1127 MM) GYPSUM BOARD APPLIED TO THE GARAGE SIDE GARAGE BENEATH HABITABLE ROOMS SHALL BE SEPARAT® FROM ALL HABITABLE ROOMS ABOVE BY NOT LESS THAN A S1rTYPE X GYPSUM BOARD OR EQUIVALENT. 5.2 BENEATH STAIRS AND LANDINGS: SPACES UNDER STAIRWAYS SERVING AND CONTAINED WITHIN ASINGLE RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNIT IN SHALL BE PDiMBTEDTO BE PROTECTED ON THE ENCLOSED SIDE WITH W GYPSUM BOARD. FH a= omega E'.o Sum' �N�EPg ¢Z ov Z a o� � W 022 w 0 = td_ Z t::! z ck� Q Q ,o LU O cin �2 issue date: 01.2&2016 revisions IF JDB N0: 14139 PAW MGP: 0 DRAWN: ® CHECKED - building sections plan 1 A3.00 PL Et PL FF "MEMERRANEAN" Rear Elevation SCALE:1 /4"=1'-0" AT 22'X34" SCALE 1/8—l'-0"AT 11717" "MEWERRANEAN" Front Elevation SCALE: 1 /4"=1'-0" AT 221X34" SCALE 1 /8"=1' 0' AT i l"X1 T' exterior elevation notes A. REFER TO GENERAL N07ESHEETS FOR TYPICAL REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS. B. WNDOW'HEAD' HEIGHTS: -1ST FLOOR =8'{f U.N.C. ON EXT. ELEVATIONS -DOOR HEGFTIS AS NOTED ON PLANS. (ALIGN ADJACENT WINDOW HEADER HEIGHT WITH DOOR HEADERS.) C. DaEUOR WALLS: STUCCO PER GENERAL NOTES, CORROSION RESISTANT WEEP SCREED AT BASE D. ODEUOR SOFHTS: STUCCO PER GENERAL NOTES. E ROOFING: -CL/SS'N FIRE-RETARDANTASPHALT SHINGLES. PER GENERAL. NOTES. SEE ROOFING DETAILS FOR FASCIAS. COLOR AND FINISH TO MATCH EXISTING F. WINDOWS: -VINYL WINDOWS PER GENERAL NOTE, DIVIDED LIES WHERE SHOWN ON EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS. G. ENTRY DOORS: RAISED PANEL PER GENERAL NOTES AND AS SELECTED BY OWNER. H. DOOR AND WNDOWTRIM: -flBERCEMENTTRIM WITH WOOD GRAIN FINISH, PER GENERAL. NOTES. SEE DETAILS ELEVATION KEYNOTES ❑1 CEAENITIOUS FOAM TRIM PER GENERAL NOTES. 1X3 UN.O. SEE DETAILS. ❑2 CEME NITDOUS FOAM CORBELS PER GENERAL NOTES. SEE DEARS a CORROSION RESISTANT SCREEN LOUVERED VENT. 12X24' U.N.O. OCORROSION RESISTANT ROOF TO WALL U FLASHING. SE? ROOF DE ABS. F51 RESAWN WOOD BRACE AND/OR BEAM SEE DETAILS © DECORATIVE WROUGHT IRON POTSHEF ❑7 EXLSING WROUGHT IRON POOL FENCING ❑B STUCCO COVERING ERLSTING BRICK COLUMNS W U < U Q Z c/) Zv QQ 06 W o02W W Z N '0W V) om IL O oo :r -- 7 L- U E :5 -Q Rn TN o V� U � L c -o r 4— o /II 0 issue date: revisions 01• 2116 JDBND: 14IN fNUWN: ® PRaIMGR: KF CFRECIOL: exterior elevations plan 1 A3.10 PL _ PL "MEDITERRANEAN" Right Elevation SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" AT 71X34" SCALE: 1 /8"=1'-0" AT 11 "X1 T' "MEDURRANEAN" Left Elevation SCALE: 1 /4"=V -(r AT 71"X34" SCALE: 1/8 =1'-0" AT 11"X17" exterior elevation notes A. REFERTOGENERAL NOTESHEETS FOR TYPICAL. REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS. B. WINDOW'HEAD'HEUGMS: -IST FLOOR=" UN.O.ON EXL ELEVATIONS -DDOR HEIGHTS AS NOTED ON PLANS. 1AUGN ADJACENT WINDOW HEADER HEIGHT WITH DOOR HEADERS.) C. EXTERIOR WALLS: STUCCO PER GENERAL NOTES, CORROSION RESISTANT WEEP SCREED AT BASE D. EMIOR SOFF95: STUCCO PER GENERAL NOTES. E ROOFING: -CLASS'A' FIRE -RETARDANT ASPHALT SHINGLES. PERGENERALNOTB.SEE ROORNGDEIABS FOR FASCIAS. COLOR AND FINISH TO MATCH EXISTING F. WINDOWS: -VINYL WINDOWS PER GENERAL NOTES, DIVIDED UTSWHERESHOWNON EGEIOR ELEVATIONS. G. ENTRY DOORS: -RAISED PANEL PER GENERAL NOTE AND AS SELECTED BY OWNER. H. DOOR AND WINDOWTRIM: -HBERCEMENTTRIM WITH WOOD GRAM FINISH, PER GENERAL NOTES. SEE DETAILS ELEVATION KEYNOTES ❑T CDABMOUS FOAM TRIM PER GENERAL NOTE. 1X3 UN.O. SEE DETARS. nCEMBNTTIOUS FOAM CORBELS PER GENERAL NOTES. SEE DRABS O CORROSION RSISTANISCREEN LOUVERED VENT.17n,r UN.O. CORROSION RESISTANT ROOFTO WALL BASHING. SEE ROOF DETAILS. RESAWN WOOD BRACE AND/OR BEAM. SEEDRABS 0b DECORATIVE WROUGHT IRON POTSHBF Fi EXISTING WROUGHT IRON POOL FENCING E3 STUCCO COVERING MSTING BRICK COLUMNS o �11 o°mtl!j Enp3Z Ery a g iiiiiip plan 1 A3.11 U Q U= 70, Z OU Z < g� D g 4-- w c 0 Z LL- U tV 1W � om L O �o E 5 L2 I— D N �O U � O O issue date: tevislons 01-m2m6 JOB 14139 DRANTR: B PRWMGR: " KF CHEC exterior elevations plan 1 A3.11 issue dole: e0sions JOB NO: 14139 PROJMGR: KF DRAWN: DB CHECKED: massing study plan 1 A3.12 II I 1 I I I I II I I I I I I II I I I I I I II I I I I I I II I I I I 73'-1' 11 15-1 D1/2 I I I I I I ¢3, 3'-6" i t I I 34'- 2" i I I I I I I I 8'-11• t0'J" II II I II II II I II II I I II c b I I I i I i A= Aam ii II ( II 59365L I ( 8065 SGD I V6SL 1 (-�,- 20VSH 4050X0 REPLACEWOOD CLG BREAK BURNINGFREPLACE i WIGASAPPLIANCE dining �IVing U,.�.� I � 20S15HD LD pO HARDSURFACE 8'ACLG kitchen VOL`LG ------ _ i r-- ------ . = --_ HARTDTSURLFGACE CHARD SURFACE VOLCLG CLG B_mi-aster REAK- s --_-' WALL ABV ma-, If1 a II _ 1616001` STORAGE I HARDSURFACE _------------------ 8'-0' CLG . - - - - - - - - - --FL00RAB1T I S10AGE- as, .... , . m bath 3 STEP _ �_-- Zjl M1a$ HARD SURFACE----------------- - - - - - S'-tl'CLG 669 ao 266B BI hall L - - HARD SURFACE i� `CLG BREAK-, FLOOR ABI . ------_----L- - I L hill 1 _ est He �G I II entry II I HARD3t7RPACE ; �'---I ( I -9A Lu I JR:) ? I i I < I 3 car garage 1 1 N !I EXPOSED CONC. ( �I FLOOR ABV i _ La J'- - L------'—-----------_--� I� 7�1 AREA IN RED INDICATES I x i den/sitting rrn I(; FOOTAREDUCGE IN AND/OR RE MA --------------------I II CARPEL : `' I FOOTAGE AND/OR MASSING bath 4 \ / \ /I-H--D � ----- � ------ --�\ ---- //-I- -- I' I ;� H 8'-0 --------\ / \ / ---------------- J-.'. ------------------ - 60685G0 Proposed First Floor Plan SCALE: 1 /4"=1 V' AT 22"X34" SCALE: I/8"-1'-0" AT I I"XIT' 4'-0" 2'-5' 164 2'-5" 8'-4" T-5" 6'-1" 21'-7 4'-6" 1'-6" 2'-0` 31'-11 • 31'-9" 73'-1' AREA IN BLUE INDICATES RELOCATION OF SQUARE FOOTAGE AND/OR NEW MASSING AREA IN RED INDICATES REDUCTION IN SQUARE FOOTAGE AND/OR MASSING -.ond Floor MIN CITY m. OF DIAMOND BAR - 21810 COPLEY DRIVE - DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 - TEL, (909) 839-7030 - FAX (909) 861-3117 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 10.1 MEETING DATE: March 8, 2016 CASE/FILE NUMBER: Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL2015-498 PROJECT LOCATION: 21618 Lost River Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91789 (APN 8285-004-009) GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Medium Density Residential (RLM) ZONING DISTRICT: Low Medium Density Residential (RLM) PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT: Wei Chan Hwang and Jennifer Nguyen 21618 Lost River Dr. Diamond Bar, CA 91765 The applicant is requesting approval of a Development Review (DR) application to construct a 1,425 square -foot single -story addition to an existing 1,288 square -foot, one-story single- family residence with an attached 348 square -foot garage on a 0.18 gross acre (7,820 gross square -foot) lot. A Minor Conditional Use Permit (MCUP) is requested to allow an addition over 50 percent of the existing square -footage to a nonconforming structure with a preexisting existing side back of 8-2" to the west (where 10 feet is required). Adopt the attached Resolution (Attachment 1) approving Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL2015-498, based on the findings of Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Sections 22.48, 22.56, and 22.68 subject to conditions. BACKGROUND: The project site is located on the south side of Lost River Drive, between Evergreen Springs Drive and Castle. Rock Road. The property was developed in 1963 under Los Angeles County standards with a 1,288 square -foot single family residence and a 348 square -foot garage on a 0.18 gross acre (7,820 square -foot) lot. There are no protected trees on site. The existing house is situated toward the front of the lot, approximately 31 feet from the front property line. The property is legally described as Lot 109 of Tract No. 25987, and the Assessor's Parcel Number (APN) is 8285-004-009. Project Description The proposed addition is located at the rear of the existing residence. The addition consists of the following components: PROJECT SUMMARY (square footage). Living Area 28 Existing �,288 New 11,4255 Total Living Area 2,713 Garage/Storage Existing 348] Total Garage Area 348 TOTAL FLOOR AREA 3,061 The existing single -story home consists of common areas (great room, dining room, laundry room, and kitchen), four bedrooms, and two bathrooms. The applicant is proposing to combine two of the existing bedrooms to create one large bedroom and add a new master bedroom suite at the rear of the house. Additionally, the applicant is proposing to relocate the dining room and add a family room at the rear of the house. The height of the existing house is 14 feet. The applicant is proposing to raise a portion of the roof of the house by four feet. The proposed height of the house is 18 feet, measured from the finished grade to the highest point of the roofline. The proposed roof will match the existing roof style, pitch, and materials. The existing residence has a front setback of 31 feet and a rear setback of 22'-10". The east side setback is 6-10". The existing residence has a nonconforming west side setback of 8'-2" (10 feet is required). By definition, the residence is considered a "nonconforming structure" (DBMC Section 22.68.030). Approval of a Minor Conditional Use Permit is required to allow an expansion of a nonconforming structure if the expansion is greater than 50 percent of the existing square footage of all structures, or if the expansion is not limited to the ground floor. Site and Grading Configuration: The property is a rectangular -shaped lot. The existing house is situated on a leveled pad and is not a hillside property. The proposed addition is located on an existing leveled pad at the rear of the house. Therefore, there will be no grading on the site. Minimal. excavation will be required for footings and foundation placement for the addition. Architectural Features, Colors, and Materials: The architecture of the existing residence is a 1960s ranch style tract design with stucco and concrete roof tiles on a Dutch -gabled roof. Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL 2015-498 Page 2 of 8 The proposed design will maintain architectural integrity by incorporating similar fenestration patterns, and matching exterior colors and building materials. The applicant is chimney three feet of stone veneer along the front elevation and the entire height of the chimney to highlight the focal point of the front fagado. The proposed increase in the height of a portion of the roof will create 10 -foot high ceilings in the proposed family room. The roof of the proposed roof will match the existing roof style, 4:12 pitch, and materials. Existing Front Elevation g%sill [SEMI Fir INNIS it � '� ! ._ �. � 1�1 �1 �� Fli Proposed Front Elevation Site and Surrounding General Plan, Zoning and Land Uses The following table describes the surrounding land uses located adjacent to the subject property: Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL 2015-498 Page 3 of 8 Site Aerial Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL 2015-498 - Page 4 of 8 Adjacent Property to the South Review Authority (DBMC Sections 22.48 and 22.56) The proposed project requires two separate, but interrelated, land use approvals: Development Review (DR) and a Minor Conditional Use Permit (MCUP). The analysis that follows provides the basis for staff's recommendation to approve the DR and MCUP applications. Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL 2015-498 rage 0 Ul 0 � � = �'-*- I Additions that are equal to or greater than 50 percent of the existing habitable floor area of all existing structures on site or substantially change the appearance of an existing residence require Planning Commission approval of a DR application. Development Review approval is required to ensure compliance with the City's General Plan policies, development standards, and design guidelines, and to minimize adverse effects of the proposed project upon the surrounding properties and the City in general. As stated in Section 22.48.010 of the Development Code, the Development Review process was established to ensure that new development and additions to existing development are consistent with the General Plan "through the promotion of high functional and aesthetic standards to complement and add to the economic, physical, and social character" of Diamond Bar. Development Standards: The following table compares the proposed project with the City's development standards for residential development in the RLIVI zone: greater than 50 percent of the existing home. See MCUP discussion below. Landscaping: Landscape plans are not required because the site is already developed, and because the project is exempt from the City's Water Efficient Landscaping Ordinance. The ordinance would only apply if new or rehabilitated landscaping of 2,500 square feet or less was being installed or altered. However, landscaping that is damaged during construction will need to be restored upon project completion. This requirement is included as a condition of approval. Minor Conditional Use Permit (DBMC Chapter 22.66) An IVICUP is required if a change or expansion of a nonconforming structure is greater than 50 percent of the existing square footage of all structures on site, or if the addition is not Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL 2015-498 Page 6 of 8 limited to the ground floor. Current development standards require a minimum setback of five feet and 10 feet from the side property lines. The existing residence has a nonconforming west side setback of 8'-2". The proposed addition is located at the rear of the lot and does not further encroach into the nonconforming side setback. The City recognizes that homeowners should be allowed to make appropriate improvements to their properties, even if the existing improvements do not fully conform to current development standards. Therefore, the City has established the IVICUP process for such additions, subject to the findings set forth in the Development Code. IVICLIPs are normally subject to approval of the City's Hearing Officer (typically the Community Development Director). However, because this IVICUP is being reviewed as part of a DR application, both land use entitlements are subject to review and approval of the Planning Commission. Staff believes that approving the IVICUP as described above is appropriate and compatible with other residences in the neighborhood, based on the following facts and observations: • The existing dwelling was built in 1963, prior to the incorporation of the City of Diamond Bar; ® The proposed addition does not further encroach into the existing nonconforming setback, setback 8'-2" from the west side property line; ® The proposed addition is located at the rear of the residence; and ® Neighboring properties have nonconforming setbacks, so the proposed project will remain consistent with other homes within the neighborhood. Compatibility with Neighborhood The proposed project complies with the goals and objectives as set forth in the adopted General Plan in terms of land use and density. The project is designed to be compatible with the character of the existing homes in the neighborhood. The addition is proposed to be located at the rear of the existing residence, set back 22 feet, 10 inches from the rear property line. The addition does not further encroach into the existing 8'-2" side setback to the west. Although the applicant is proposing to raise the existing roof by four feet, the proposed roof style, pitch and materials will match existing. Furthermore, the addition will match the existing home in color and building materials and will incorporate similar architectural features. Therefore, the addition will be visually integrated into the existing home and not negatively impact the look and character of the neighborhood. The project incorporates the principles of the City's Residential Design Guidelines as follows: A gradual transition between the addition and existing residence is achieved through appropriate setbacks, building height, landscaping, and window and door placement; Elevations are treated with detailed architectural elements; Roof lines are representative of the design and scale of the structure through vertical and horizontal articulations; Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL 2015-498 Page 7 of 8 Placement and relationship of windows, doors, and other window openings are carefully integrated with the building's overall design; The addition is visually integrated with the primary structure, by utilizing similar colors, and materials throughout the proposed addition; Roof type, pitch and materials of the addition match the primary structure; and Large wall expanses without windows or doors are avoided. The Public Works Department and Building and Safety Division reviewed this project, and their comments are included in the attached resolution as conditions of approval. On February 25, 2016, public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 500 -foot radius of the project site. On February 26, 2016, the notice was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers. A notice display board was posted at the site, and a copy of the notice was posted at the City's three designated community posting sites. Public Comments Received No comments have been received as of the publication date of this report. This project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on that assessment, the City has determined the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of - CEQA pursuant to the provisions of Article 19 Section 15301(e) (additions to existing structures) of the CEQA Guidelines. No further environmental review is required. Prepared by: K IAN Is -11", Attachments: 1.* Draft Resolution No. 2016 -XX and Standard Conditions of Approval 2. Site Plan, Floor Plans, and Elevations Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL 2015-498 Hage is of 6 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2016 -XX A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. PL2015-498 TO CONSTRUCT 1,425 SQUARE -FOOT SINGLE -STORY ADDITION TO AN EXISTING 1,288 SQUARE -FOOT, ONE-STORY SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH AN ATTACHED 348 SQUARE -FOOT GARAGE ON A 0.18 GROSS ACRE (7,820 GROSS SQUARE -FOOT) LOT. A MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED TO ALLOW AN ADDITION OVER 50 PERCENT OF THE EXISTING SQUARE -FOOTAGE TO AN EXISTING NONCONFORMING STRUCTURE WITH A SIDE BACK OF 8'-2" TO THE WEST (WHERE 10 FEET IS REQUIRED) AT 21618 LOST RIVER DRIVE, DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 (APN 8285-004-009). A. RECITALS The property owners/applicants, Wei Chan Hwang and Jennifer Nguyen, has filed an application for Development Review and Minor .Conditional Use Permit No. PL2015-498 application to construct a single -story addition consisting of 1,425 square feet of floor area to an existing 1,288 square -foot, one-story, single-family residence with an attached 348 square -foot, two -car garage located at 21618 Lost River Drive, Diamond Bar, County of Los Angeles, California. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit shall be referred to as the "Proposed Project." 2. The following approvals are requested from the Planning Commission: (a) Development Review to construct a one-story addition consisting of 1,425 square feet of floor area. (b) Minor Conditional Use Permit to allow a second -story addition to a nonconforming structure with a preexisting side back of 8'-2" to the west (where 10 feet is required). Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit shall be referred to as the "Proposed Project." 3. The subject property is made up of one parcel totaling 7,820 gross square feet (0.18 gross acres). It is located in the Low Medium Density Residential (RLM) zone with an underlying General Plan land use designation of Low Medium Density Residential. 4. The legal description of the subject property is Lot 109 of Tract No. 25987. The Assessor's Parcel Number is 8285-004-009. 5. On February 25, 2016, public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 500 -foot radius of the Project site. On February 26, 2016, notification of the public hearing for this project was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers; and public notices were posted at the City's designated community posting sites. In addition to the published and mailed notices, the project site was posted with a display board. 6. On March 8, 2016, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing, solicited testimony from all interested individuals, and concluded said hearing on that date. . NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct; and 2. The Planning Commission hereby determines the Project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to the provisions of Article 19, Section 15301 (e) (additions to existing structures) of the CEQA Guidelines. Therefore, no further environmental review is required. C. FINDINGS OF FACT Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein and as prescribed under Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Sections 22.48, 22.56, and 22.68 this Planning Commission hereby finds as follows: Development Review Findings (DBMC Section 22.48.040) The design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with the applicable elements of the City's General Plan, City Design Guidelines, and development standards of the applicable district, design guidelines, and architectural criteria for special areas (e.g., theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards or planned developments). The design and layout of the proposed one-story addition consisting of 1,425 square feet of floor area to an existing single family residence is consistent with the City's General Plan, City Design Guidelines and development standards by complying with all required setbacks, with the exception to an existing nonconforming west side setback of 8'-2", where 10 feet is required. The addition is located at the rear of the existing. house. The project site is not part of any theme area, specific plan, community plan, boulevard or planned development. 2 DR and MCUP PL2015-498 2. The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. The proposed addition Will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments because the use of the project site is designed for a single-family home and the surrounding uses are also single-family homes. The addition is proposed at the rear of the house and does not further encroach into the nonconforming west side setback of 8' - The proposed addition will not interfere with vehicular or pedestrian movements, such as access or other functional requirements of a single- family home because it complies with the requirements for driveway widths and is a continuation of an existing use. 3. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible* with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain and enhance the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22.48: Development Review Standards, the City's Design Guidelines, the City's General Plan, or any applicable specific plan. The existing architecture is a 1960s ranch style tract design with stucco and concrete roof tiles on a Dutch -gabled roof. The applicant is proposing to retain the. existing building form, but is introducing stone veneer along the front elevation and the entire height of the chimney to highlight the focal point of the front fagade. Additionally, the applicant is proposing to raise a portion of the roof from 14 feet to 18 feet, but will match the existing roof style, pitch and materials. Therefore, the addition will be visually integrated into the existing home and not negatively impact the look and character of the neighborhood. 4. The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture,- color, and will remain aesthetically appealing. The existing architecture is a 1960s ranch style tract home with stucco and concrete roof tiles on a Dutch -gable roof. The applicant is proposing to retain the existing building form, but is introducing stone veneer along the front elevation and the entire height of the chimney to highlight the focal point of the front fagade. Additionally, a portion of the roof will be raised from 14 feet to 18 feet and will match the existing roof style, pitch and materials. The single -story addition is located at the rear of the existing home. Therefore, the addition will be visually integrated into the existing home and not negatively impact the look and character of the neighborhood. 3 DR and MCUP PL2015-498 5. The proposed development will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious (e.g., negative effect on property values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Before the issuance of any City permits, the proposed project is required to comply with all conditions within the approved resolution, and the Building and Safety Division and Public Works Departments requirements. Through the permit and inspection process, the referenced agencies will ensure that the proposed project is not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. 6. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as set forth under Article 19 Section 15301 (e) (additions to existing structures) of the CEQA guidelines. Minor Conditional Use Permit Findings (DBMC. Section 22.56.040) The proposed use is allowed within the subject zoning district with the approval of a Minor Conditional Use Permit and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Development Code and the Municipal Code. The existing single-family dwelling is a permitted use in the RLM zone. A Minor Conditional Use Permit (MCUP) is requested to allow an addition over 50 percent of the existing square -footage to a nonconforming structure with a preexisting 8'-2" west side setback (where 10 feet is required). The preexisting substandard west side setback renders the project nonconforming. The addition of a nonconforming structure requires approval of a Minor Conditional Use Permit because the addition is greater than 50 percent of the existing home. The proposed addition consisting of 1, 425 square feet of floor area to an existing one-story home complies with the development standards of the RLM zone and will not further encroach into the nonconforming west side setback. 2. The proposed use is consistent with the general plan and any applicable specific plan. The proposed addition to a single-family dwelling unit is consistent with the City's adopted General Plan. The site is not subject to the provisions of any specific plan. 4 DR and MCUP PL2015-498 3. The design, location, size and operating characteristics of the proposed use are compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity. The existing single-family dwelling and the proposed addition consisting of 1,425 square feet of floor area will not further encroach into the existing nonconforming W-2" west side setback. The proposed one-story addition is located at rear of the house. The design of the existing single-family dwelling and the proposed addition are compatible with the character of the existing homes in the neighborhood because the applicant is proposing to retain the existing building form. Therefore, the addition will be visually integrated into the existing home and not negatively impact the look and character of the neighborhood. 4. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of use being proposed including access, provision of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and the absence of physical constraints. The subject site is physically suitable for the existing single-family residential dwelling and the proposed addition. The existing and proposed use of land is consistent with the surrounding land uses. The proposed addition of floor area is consistent with the development standards for the RLM zone and will not further encroach into the existing nonconforming side setback to the west. 5. Granting the Minor Conditional Use Permit will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property or improvements in the vicinity and zoning district in which the property is located. The granting of the Minor Conditional Use Permit will allow the addition of the existing single-family dwelling unit in a manner similar with existing dwelling units located in the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed expansion of the dwelling unit will not negatively impact the public interest, health, safety convenience or welfare. 6. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as set forth under Article 19 Section 15301 (e) (additions to existing. structure) of the CEQA Guidelines. Non -Conforming Structures Findings (DBMC Section 22.68.030) The addition, enlargement, extension, reconstruction, relocation or structural alteration of the nonconforming structure would not result in the structure becoming: 1. Incompatible with other structures in the neighborhood. 5 DR and MCUP PL2015-498 The proposed one-story addition of floor area Is consistent with the development standards for the RLM zone. The existing single-family dwelling and the proposed addition consisting of 1,425 square feet of floor area will comply with current development standards and not further encroach into the existing nonconforming side setback of W-2" to the west side property line. The proposed project is located at the rear of the existing home. The existing and proposed land use is consistent with the surrounding land uses and structures in the neighborhood. Additionally, the neighboring properties also have nonconforming setbacks, so the proposed project will remain consistent with other homes within the neighborhood. 2. Inconsistent with the general plan or any applicable specific plan. The proposed addition to a single-family dwelling unit is consistent with the City's adopted General Plan. The site is not subject to the provisions'of any specific plan. 3. A restriction to the eventual/future compliance with the applicable regulations of this Development Code. I The existing and proposed land use is consistent with the surrounding land uses with similar side setbacks. The proposed addition of floor area is consistent'' with the development standards for the RLM zone and will not encroach into the existing nonconforming west side setback. 4. Detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of persons residing in the neighborhood. Before the issuance of any City permits, -the proposed project is required to comply with all conditions within the approved resolution, and the Building and Safety Division and Public Works/Engineering Departments requirements. Through the permit and inspection process, the referenced agencies will ensure that the proposed project is not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. 5. Detrimental and/or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood. The addition to the existing single-family dwelling unit will be constructed in a manner similar with existing dwelling units located in the surrounding community and will not be detrimental and/or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood. 6 DR and MCUP PL2015-498 Based upon the findings and conclusion set forth above, the Planning Commission hereby approves this Application, subject to the following conditions: 1 Development shall substantially comply with the plans and documents presented to the Planning Commission at the public hearing. 2. Standard Conditions. The applicant shall comply with . the standard development conditions attached hereto. The Planning Commission shall: a. Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and b. Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail to the property owner/applicant, Wei Chan Hwang and Jennifer Nguyen, 21618 Lost River Dr., Diamond Bar, CA 91765. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF MARCH 2016, BY'THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. 1, Greg Gubman, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of March, 2016, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: ABSTAIN: Commissioners: ATTEST: Greg Gubman, Secretary 7 DR and MCUP PL2015-498 n�nio nN $Ar Q COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT USE PERMITS, COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL NEW AND REMODELED STRUCTURES PROJECTM Development Review. and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL 2015-498 SUBJECT: To construct a 1,425 square -foot one-story addition to an existing 1,288 square -foot, one-story single-family residence with an attached two -car garage; and Minor Conditional Use Permit to allow an addition over 50 percent of the existing square -footage to an existing nonconforming structure with a side setback of 8'-2" to the west (where 10 feet is required). PROPERTY Wei Chan Hwang and Jennifer Nguyen OWNER/ 21618 Lost River Drive APPLICANT: Diamond Bar, CA 91765 LOCATION: 21618 Lost River Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 1111711iiyqq 114111 01517410:1115�1 1��' I � i , r.-11 31111,111, , zMaN= I. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION AT (909) 839-7030, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, and its officers, agents and employees, from any claim, action, or proceeding to attack, set-aside, void or annul, the approval of Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL2015-498 brought within the time period provided by Government Code Section 66499.37. In the event the city and/or its officers, agents and employees are made a party of any such action: 8 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016 -XX (a) Applicant shall provide a defense to the City defendants or at the City's option reimburse the City its costs of defense, including reasonable attorneys fees, incurred in defense of such claims. (b) Applicant shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against the City defendants. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action of proceeding, and shall cooperate fully in the defense thereof. 2. This approval shall not be effective for any purpose until the applicant and owner of the property involved have filed, within twenty-one (21) days of approval of this Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL2015-498, at the City of Diamond Bar Community Development Department, their affidavit stating that they are aware of and agree to accept all the conditions of this approval. Further, this approval shall not be effective until the applicants pay remaining City processing fees, school fees and fees for the review of submitted reports. 3. All designers, architects, engineers, and contractors associated with this project shall obtain a Diamond Bar Business License; and a zoning approval for those businesses located in Diamond Bar. 4. Signed copies of Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016 -XX, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 5. Prior to the plan check, revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditioris of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval. 6. Prior to, any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval shall be completed. 7. The project site shall be maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of approval and all laws, or other applicable regulations. 8. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and any applicable Specific Plan in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 9 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016 -XX 0 C. Fill 9. All site, grading, landscape/irrigation, .and roof plans, and elevation plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of City permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 10. The property owner/applicant shall remove the public hearing notice board within three days of this project's approval. 11. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of City Planning, Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works Department, and the Fire Department. FEES/DEPOSITS Applicant shall pay development fees (including but not limited to Planning, Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works Department and Mitigation Monitoring) at the established rates, prior to issuance of building or grading permit (whichever comes first), as required by the City. School fees as required shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permit. In addition, the applicant shall pay all remaining prorated City project review and processing fees prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever comes first. 2. Prior to any plan check, all deposit accounts for the processing of this project shall have no deficits. TIME LIMITS 1. The approval of Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL2015-498 expires within two years from the date of approval if the use has not been exercised as defined pursuant to Diamond Bar. Municipal Code (DBMC) Section 22.66.050(b)(1). In accordance with DBMC Section 22.60.050(c), the applicant may request, in writing, a one-year time extension for Planning Commission consideration. Such a request must be submitted to the Planning Division prior to the expiration date and be accompanied by the review fee in accordance with the Fee Schedule in effect• at the time of submittal. SITE DEVELOPMENT This approval is to construct a one-story addition consisting of 1,425 square feet of floor area to an existing single-family residence located at 21618 Lost River Drive, as described in the staff report 10 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016 -XX and depicted on the approved plans on file with the Planning Division, subject to the conditions listed herein. 2. The construction documents submitted for plan check shall be in substantial compliance with the architectural plans approved by the Planning Commission, as modified pursuant to the conditions below. If the plan check submittal is not in substantial compliance with the approved Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit submittal, the plans may require further staff review and re - notification of the surrounding property owners, which may delay the project and entail additional fees. 3. To ensure compliance with the provisions of the Planning Commission approval, a final inspection is required from the Planning Division when work for any phase of the project has been completed. The applicant.shall inform the Planning Division and schedule an appointment for such an inspection. 4. The above conditions shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all future owners, operators, or successors thereto of the property. Non-compliance with any condition of approval or mitigation measure imposed as a condition of the approval shall constitute a violation of the City's Development Code. Violations may be enforced in accordance with the provisions of the Development Code. 5. Failure to comply with any of the conditions set forth above or as subsequently amended in writing by the City, may result in failure to obtain a building final and/or a certificate of occupancy until full compliance is reached. The City's requirement for full compliance may require minor corrections and/or complete demolition of a non- compliant improvement, regardless of costs incurred where the project does not comply with design requirements and approvals that the applicant agreed to when permits were pulled to construct the project. 6. The project site shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the approved plans submitted to, approved, and amended herein by the Planning Commission, collectively attached referenced as site plans, floor plans, architectural elevations, and landscape plans on file with the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 7. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, air conditioning condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete 11 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016 -XX or masonry walls, berms, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Division. 8. All roof -mounted equipment shall be screened from public view. 9. All structures, including walls, trash enclosures, canopies, etc., shall be maintained in a structurally sound, safe manner with a clean, orderly appearance. All graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours by the property owners/occupant. 10. All landscaping, structures, architectural features and public improvements damaged during construction shall be repaired or replaced upon project. completion. E. SOLID WASTE 1. The site shall be maintained in a condition, which is free of debris both during and after the construction, addition, or implementation of the entitlement approved herein. The removal of all trash; debris, and refuse, whether during or subsequent to construction shall be done only by the property owner, applicant or by a duly permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste from residential, commercial., construction, and industrial areas within the City. It shall be the applicant's obligation to insure that the waste contractor used has obtained permits from the City of Diamond. Bar to provide such services. 2. Mandatory solid waste disposal services shall be provided by the City franchised waste hauler to all parcels/lots or uses affected by approval of this project. 11. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, (909) 839-7040, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. An Erosion Control Plan shall be submitted concurrently with the .grading plan clearly deta'iling erosion control measures. These measures shall be implemented during construction. The erosion control plan shall conform to national Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards and incorporate the appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP's) as specified in the Storm Water BMP Certification. For construction activity which disturbs one acre or greater soil a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be needed. 12. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016 -XX C. DRAINAGE Detailed drainage system information of the lot with careful attention to any flood hazard area shall be submitted. All drainage/runoff from the development shall be conveyed from the site to the natural drainage course. No on-site drainage shall be conveyed to adjacent parcels, unless that is the natural drainage course. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 839-7020, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. GENERAL CONDITIONS: 1. At the time of plan check submittal, plans and construction shall conform to current State and Local Building Code (i.e., 2013 California Building Code series will apply) requirements and all other applicable construction codes, ordinances and regulations in effect. 2. Provisions for CALGreen shall be implemented onto plans and certification shall be provided by a third party as required by the Building Division. Specific water, waste, low VOC, and related conservation measures shall be shown on plans. Construction shall conform to the current CALGreen Code. B. PLAN CHECK — ITEMS TO BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO PLAN APPROVAL: 1. The minimum design load for wind in this area is 110 M.P.H. exposures "C" and the site is within seismic zone D or E. The applicant shall submit drawings and calculations prepared by a California State licensed Architect/Engineer with wet stamp and signature. 2. This project shall comply with the energy conservation requirements of the State of California Energy Commission. All lighting shall be high efficacy or equivalent per the current California Energy Code 119 and 150(k). 3. Indoor air quality shall be provided consistent with ASHRAE 62.2 as required per California Energy Code 150(o). 4. All easements shall be shown on the site plan. 5. A soils report is required per CBC 1803 and all recommendations of the soils report shall be adhered to. 13 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016 -XX 6. Slope setbacks shall be consistent with California Building Code Figure 1805.3.1 and California Residential Code R403.1.7. Foundations shall provide a minimum distance to daylight. C. Permit — Items required prior to building permit issuance: 1 Solid waste management of construction material shall incorporate recycling material collection per Diamond Bar Municipal Code 8.16 of Title 8. The contractor shall complete all required forms and pay applicable deposits prior to permit. 2. Prior to building permit issuance, all school district fees shall be paid. Please obtain a form from the Building and Safety Division to take directly to the school district. 3. Submit drainage plans clearly showing all finish elevations, drainage patterns for the overall project, and slope setback criteria for the pool area. Surface water shall drain away from the building at a 2% minimum slope. 4. AQMD notification is required at least 10 days prior to any demolition. Proof of notification is required at permit issuance. 5. All workers on the job shall be covered by workman's compensation insurance under a licensed general contractor. Any changes to the contractor shall be updated on the building permit. 6. An occupancy separation shall be shown and provided between the garage and dwelling. 1. Every permit issued by the building official under the provisions of this Code shall expire and become null and void unless the work authorized by such permit is commenced within one -hundred -eighty (180) days after permit issuance, and if a successful inspection has not been obtained from the building official within one -hundred - eighty (180) days from the date of. permit issuance or the last successful inspection. A successful inspection shall mean a documented passed inspection by the city building inspector as outlined in Section 110.6. 2. The project shall be protected by a construction fence to the satisfaction of the Building Official. All fencing shall be view obstructing with opaque surfaces. 14 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016 -XX 3. All structures and property shall be maintained in a safe and clean manner during construction. The property shall be free of debris, trash, and weeds. 4. All equipment staging areas shall be maintained in an orderly manner and screened behind a minimum 6' high fence. 5. The project shall be protected by a construction fence and shall comply with the NPDES & BMP requirements (sand bags, etc.) 6. The applicant shall contact Dig Alert and have underground utility locations marked by the utility companies prior to any excavation. Contact Dig Alert by dialing 811 or their website at www.digalert.org. 7. Any changes or deviation from approved plans during the course of construction shall be approved by the City prior to proceeding with any work. 8. All glazing in hazardous locations shall be labeled as safety glass. The labeling shall be visible for inspection. 9. Carbon monoxide detectors are required in halls leading to sleeping rooms per CRC R315. 10. Special inspections and structural observation will be required in conformance to CBC 1704 to 1709. 11. All plumbing fixtures including existing areas shall have low flow type fixtures installed consistent with California Civil Code Section 1101.1 to 1101.8. AMD 15 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016 -XX EXISTING PROPERTY 10'-0• B• -to• Ba• -0• B' -r 1. r-0• SIDEYARD IDEYAR EXISTING SIDEYARDr1DYARD ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: SETBACK SETBACK LL* 1 BLOCK WALL SETBACKBACK ''-0'EXISTIN. WOOD CE TO J� (E) EXISTING CONC. PLANTER BOXTO REMAIN I BE REMOVED. NEW a 4000 ATTO MATH CE GNHT 11: EX1s7ING V -W 12: ( PROJECT ADDRESS: b. PROVIDE TEMPORARY ELECTRICITY AND PLANTER BOX BLOCK WALL I I I �-1—may I 7 Revision I Revision AND BE WE FORALL WORKMEN. S. ALL EXPOSED CONCRETE FINISHES TO BE OCCUPANCY: DETERMINED BY Revision OWNER/ARCHRECT/DESIGNER/CONTRACTOR Revision PRIOR TO POUR. R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING TYPE: VB, SINGLE STORY-NONSPRINKLERED I OF WORK: II II 7 PLAN SITE PLAN LEGEND : I ( 7 I I Al2,AI3 i I I T— PROPOSED RI 311MENCE ADDITION a (E) BUILDING ENTRY I II F31 (E) ENTRY COURTYARD I OWNER(S): F5] (E)GRASSI PLANT I © NOT USED (017) 823-5440 (020) 2152400 (E)BUILDING UNE MILTONHWANG®HOTMAILCOM JENZNGUYENGGMAILCOM Q (E)CONC. SIDEWALK PER CITY sTD. PLAN PREPARED BY: [fl (E)APPROACH PER CITY STD, WEI CHAN HWANG JENNIFER NGUYEN ® (E) PLANTER BOX (017) 8238448 (020) 215-2400 n (E)CHIMNEY MILTONHWANG@HOTMAILCOM JENZNGUYENQGMAILCOM EXISTING PROPERTY (E) y SURFACE GE DIRECTION �IEXISTING RESIDENCE I I TBO !I r I TBD EXISTING GARAGE I LOCKSTI GT4 �VALL 7 —— � I PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: C.R.C. REGARDING PROTECTION OF 3: I REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, COUNTY OF LOS EXISTINGO-0 WOOD FENCE ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 10 r4 ( STING TJ• L� FENCE 840e0 804. PACE(S) 29 TO Ze, INCLUSIVE OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF ''-0'EXISTIN. WOOD CE TO J� GATE TO REIN I BE REMOVED. NEW a 4000 ATTO MATH CE GNHT 11: a INSTALL TEMPORARY TOILET FACILITY ON 12: E PROJECT ADDRESS: b. PROVIDE TEMPORARY ELECTRICITY AND Revision I I Revision �-1—may 21018 LOST RIVER DRIVE, DIAMOND BAR, CA 01705 I I Revision r Revision AND BE WE FORALL WORKMEN. S. ALL EXPOSED CONCRETE FINISHES TO BE OCCUPANCY: DETERMINED BY Revision OWNER/ARCHRECT/DESIGNER/CONTRACTOR Revision PRIOR TO POUR. R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING TYPE: VB, SINGLE STORY-NONSPRINKLERED LOST RIVER DRIVE Proposed Site Plan Scale: 1 /8"=1'-0" GENERAL NOTES SITE PLAN PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 1. CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO CHAPTER 33, SECTION 3305 OF THE 2013 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: C.R.C. REGARDING PROTECTION OF 3: PEDESTRIANS DURING DEMOLITION OR REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, COUNTY OF LOS CONSTRUCTION. ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 2. THE PROJECT SHALL CONFORM TO THE LOT 100 OF TRACT NO. 25907, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK STATE OF CALIFORNIA TITLE 24 ENERGY 804. PACE(S) 29 TO Ze, INCLUSIVE OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF CODER. SEE ND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTSATTACHTTACHEDTTO O THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. 9: 3. CONTRA CTORSHALLPROVIDETEMPORARY APN: 0285004000 FACILITIES: 11: a INSTALL TEMPORARY TOILET FACILITY ON 12: SITE- PROJECT ADDRESS: b. PROVIDE TEMPORARY ELECTRICITY AND Revision WATER FOR THE EXPRESS PURPOSE OF Revision THE CONSTRUCTION. 21018 LOST RIVER DRIVE, DIAMOND BAR, CA 01705 C ALL WORK SHALL BE DONE INA Revision PROFESSIONAL WORKMANLIKEMANNER Revision AND BE WE FORALL WORKMEN. S. ALL EXPOSED CONCRETE FINISHES TO BE OCCUPANCY: DETERMINED BY Revision OWNER/ARCHRECT/DESIGNER/CONTRACTOR Revision PRIOR TO POUR. R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING TYPE: VB, SINGLE STORY-NONSPRINKLERED OF WORK: DEMOLITION PER J* SCALE PLAN SITE PLAN LEGEND : EXISTING GROUND FLOOR PLAN/ DEMOLITION PLAN, SHEETS Al2,AI3 ❑1 (E) PROPERTY LINE a (E) BUILDING ENTRY CONSTRUCTION OF NEW INTERIOR REMODEUNG PER }•SCALE PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN) ELEVATIONSI ROOF, SHEETS A1.4, A1.5 F31 (E) ENTRY COURTYARD ® (E)DRIVEWAY OWNER(S): F5] (E)GRASSI PLANT WEICHANHWANG JENNIFER NGUYEN © NOT USED (017) 823-5440 (020) 2152400 (E)BUILDING UNE MILTONHWANG®HOTMAILCOM JENZNGUYENGGMAILCOM Q (E)CONC. SIDEWALK PER CITY sTD. PLAN PREPARED BY: [fl (E)APPROACH PER CITY STD, WEI CHAN HWANG JENNIFER NGUYEN ® (E) PLANTER BOX (017) 8238448 (020) 215-2400 n (E)CHIMNEY MILTONHWANG@HOTMAILCOM JENZNGUYENQGMAILCOM EXISTING PROPERTY (E) y SURFACE GE DIRECTION STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: 2%SLOPE, MIN. TBO BUILDER/ CONTRACTOR: TBD Zm g�w Revision 1: 12.07.2015 Revision 2: 01.12.2016 Revision 3: Revision 4: Revision 5: Revision 6: Revision 7: Revision 6: Revision 9: Revision 10: Revision 11: Revision 12: Revision Planning Dept Revision Revision Planning Dept Revision Revision Revision Revision Revision Revision Revision Revision Revision Revision Revision 0 2 4 0 I i I I A1.1 stela: )._1,•D. CC. copyright I f L--.-- - - - - - AMENDED AREA TABULATION: LOT AREA 7.820 SF EXISTING RESIDENCE 1,288 SF EXISTING RESIDENCE GARAGE 348 SF EXISTINGTOTAL: 1,63a SF AMENDED AREA A: 253 SF AMENDED/ ADDED AREAS: 1,425 SF TOTAL AMENDED AREA 1,678 SF TOTAL AMENDED AREA IN %: 1,878 SF 11.638 SF =1.03% ----------------1 is 12.07.2015 Revision 2: 01.12.2016 Revision 3: Revision ! LOT COVERAGE TABULATON: 5: Revision 6: Revision 7: LOT AREA 7,820 SF 8: Revision 9; Revision EXISTING RESIDENCE, AREA A: 1288SF Revision 11: Revision 12: EXISTING RESIDENCE GARAGE, AREA 13: 34B SF Revision & Planning Dept Revision Revision EXISTING RESIDENCE LOT COVERAGE TOTAL' 1,636 SF Revision Revision EXISTING LOT COVERAGE IN%: 1,636SF/7,820SF=20.9% Revision Revision NEW RESIDENCE ADDITION, AREA D: 1,425 SF Revision NEW RESIDENCE LOT COVERAGE TOTAL 1,636+1,425-3,061SF NEW LOT COVERAGE IN %: 3.061SF 17,020 SF = 39% L - -- - -- - - - - - - - - - -� Revision is 12.07.2015 Revision 2: 01.12.2016 Revision 3: Revision 4: Revison 5: Revision 6: Revision 7: Revision 8: Revision 9; Revision 10: Revision 11: Revision 12: Revision & manning Dept Revision Revision & Planning Dept Revision Revision Revision Revision Revision Revision Revision Revision Revision Revlslon Revision Stormwnter Bat Management PrAdfee Ca"Wention For AB Coure—fl a Adlvldes pmjeaNsue B°Bdh$Qmdmg Pemae puejeetT�dou O—Nama Couseen-Near O—AM— CombacerAdd— Oaxmpbwo CmnsdmPhme Backgmwd:Tomeettherapdraocnbofthe Lm Angeles ComtyMuokipel Slmmwat=Pamit(N DBSno. CAS009001 DrdrrNo.01-182),minimtmrcquiremcnts for eatimcnt omWt, erosm control and constomtion activftia must bo implemented on ewhirojea site. Instrecdorue The following conditions ahaB be eitherfncmlomtad wNctes orsuarl dto the approved coatnmfmttBadbugpl=amdmpre.enttheminm stmdmd$ofgoodbmaakapingwldchmustbeimplementalmall cmasbucasa projects. MLnlmnmRequirements toprur6ABedhaeat and runabout tnasport from the atm to streets, dralnage facilldes, reedvfng paters or adi.rmtproperdes by wind or ..ff-. • Sediment CDW.L o Ppd l rd'mxnm==led m the DrOirgsits shall be retainal on site using Bast Marager—APmctisa (BMPs) and mmynotbe b r pod W from the to via shad flow. somas, ares drains,—rad drainage cumseorwied. o Vchielc tmM maynot baekeedimaata and odomusutaiata firm the site YLe eonskuctim eakmce •roadways mustbe smbM=d so as to fsbia sediments hum being depositedth into epublio way. o Accidental rlerudij rout be mtptup immafintaly and may not be washed dawn by min or by any atherux— o flitch Besinenambepmtected when workhrgnemby. o Sl — $ilW k sumepela to erosion shnB be controlled citherby covering or planning and nmintenance ofvegetation. • Consmactian Mntuinls CoohoL•(:onsWctimr-rdatal matainls, wsstea, sp8)e,mmaiduea eLall beratniaai st Boprojc . o Bxascee$arwnsm emmem maymtbe washed into the public way ormy dminago system.Provisions shall bemadc toreb io cmc elewartee maim mtil they can be appuoprb& y disposed of mrrecycled. Vaama all coamctc saw cuuJn& o T}ahand earnuaFflMjetsarnd solid wastes must be depomted into a covered mceptwlo to prevent cmte�atim ofrainwamroad disposal by wind. o Po�la tsps solventa and otherioxio materinln must bo stmai is—dance with t5ca listing and tar not to confanduate the sell man ton cudnoe waters AB approved Imdc storage containers are to be protected fmm0oweether. Spgb=ustbeataanedapfmmediaWyaoddboadofinsplopammma. SpBlnmay notbewssbedintothodrainageoyrt— Leaking gWpmenturatbernpnbaffmncdimdy. o &slasiimofcadh and otba ccadrudfoa-related materials, mmstbeProtested from beingbangmtcd . _. frau 9s: simbywind orwntermid must be covered with taps mplaatie. • Non Blum WaterBmaB:Non•ammwatatunoB'Sam equipmntamtveNcleweabing and say otberactivity shall be cmtauod at tbeTaojat $ito ' DMPEaamplar B:mmplm of aurin and sediment control BMP. for rmeruatim sites robe fond at www esb MAEa l Wks nom Additional Rapdramwtsr toiheRegiamol Consbnctimactontrol Bou dfared-1 toaomgraa bs- msutrmitnNotia ollmtm onsixu Neta QuatityCentmlSomdfomd m'iLnp ^^^•"�Aaon-n"L'm t"'"t (at Cos'tmctim Oeoaal Prsffit ondPmana) mdprovidethe f9tywilba copy ordu NOI and cbeoL Atonal StmmWaterPoi)mim Ihoventim PlmwM need to be submitted to the CitY Pdrrin Wadingpa®t approval lusts edural fnfocmati® canal.be obmioai fromPablic Wmkaupon mpeat Cer'tiBatiant A. ft mchitecUmgineer, counselor and prmject owner ofrecmd I citify dud the e-lated BMP$ ®stbe installed, momtomd, mdmnimtainedto msmeihem effrsNvmem• lhnverad sad umdastmdtlmraptinmenta listed nbavr naessaiy toemnnl mann watapoButim from sediment$, ma$im4 and constmetimmdc iol4 eadI catify that I will comply with these requirements. Archimcl/Pnginaer orCmtmctorofRamd Name Tidc (if appliable) Arehiteet/Bnginaoor ConbacforofRecmd Sigmtma Doti Legal LandownerN®e Legal Looda—cr 21618 Lost River Drive, Diamond Bar, California 91765 Date ( . A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS, THE APPLICANT SHALL RECORD, AND PROVIDE THE CITY WITH A CONFORMED RECORDED COPY OF, A COVENANT AND AGREEMENT OR SIMILAR DOCUMENT IN A FORM APPROVED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY, WHICH RESTRICTS THE RENTAL OF ROOMS OR OTHER PORTIONS OF THE PROPERTY UNDER TWO OR MORE SEPARATE AGREEMENTS AND PROHIBITS USE OF THE PROPERTY AS A BOARDING OR ROOMING HOUSE. EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT OTHERWISE PERMITTED BY THE DIAMOND BAR MUNICIPAL CODE OR APPLICABLE STATE OR FEDERALLAW. 2 AN EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHALL BE SUBMITTED CLEARLY DETAILING EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. THESE MEASURES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED DURING CONSTRUCTION. THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHALL CONFORM TO NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) STANDARDS AND INCORPORATE THE APPROPRIATE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES(SMPS) AS SPECIFIED IN THE STORM WATER BMP CERTIFICATION. PLEASE REFER TO CITY HANDOUTS. (ATTACHED ON THIS SHEET) 3. DETAILED DRAINAGE SYSTEM INFORMATION OF THE LOT WITH CAREFULATTENTION TO ANY FLOOD WIZARD AREA SHALL BE SUBMITTED. ALL DRAINAGETRUNOFF FROM THE DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CONVEYED FROM THE SITE TO THE NATURAL DRAINAGECOURSE NO ONSITE DRAINAGE SHALL. BE CONVEYED TO ADJACENT PARCELS, UNLESS THAT IS THE NATURAL DRAINAGE COURSE. Revision 1: 12.07.2015 Revision 2: 01.12.2016 Revision 3: Revision 4• Revision 5: Revision 6: Revision 7: Revision 8: Revision 9: Revision 10: Revision 11: Revision 12: Revision & Planning Dept Revision Revision Planning Dept Revision Revision Revision Revision Revision Revision Revision Revision Revision Revision Revision 0 2 4 8 Scale: J -T-0' Al. b ;copyright ea'A` LI Revision 1: 12.07.2015 Revision 2: 01.12.2016 Revision 3: Revision 4: Revision 5: Revision 6: Revision 7• Revision 8: LINE OF NEW ADDITION Revision 9: r-------------------------------------------------------------------- i Revision 10: I Revision 11: I I I I I I I Revision 12: I I I I Revision A Planning Dept Revision j1 ( RevisionPlanning Dept Revision 1 Revision i I I I Revision I I Revision I I Revision I I I Revision Revision EXISTING EDGE OF CONC j v I PATIO TO REMOVE I H Revision 1 Q----------Q---------�'---------p--------- I Revision i Revision I I I I Revision I � I I EXISTING WOODEN j TRELLIS TO REMOVE i I 1 I ( i I i 1 (E) 60M SL — _ — — — — (ME) 4040 SL (E) 6080 SM (E) 5030 SL I EXISTIN FENCE/GATE TOR N PUT] KITCHEN sore. Ii (E, BEONAI2 (E) BEDRM 4 ( ) BOR OLD,(E)DINING I I CARPET CPB�.G I ITr e4 (El BA 2 CLO. TILE (E) BEDRM 3 89 CLG. CARPET (E)MAS(ER BEDRM BE CLO CARPET I E)EMRY (E) GREAT RM 80 DLG. CARPET (E) SCAR GARAGE 82 CLG. CONC. r-------------------- I I I WALL LEGEND/ ITEM TO REMOVE ( I EXISTING WALLTO REMAIN O EXISTING WALLTO REMOVE (E)364BSL0/ (E)BFGSL 0/ (E)/5670 SECTIONAL GARAGE DOOR 3818 FG 3616 FG I Or— EXISTINGWNDWTOREMAIN _ ENS 37 EXISTINGWNDWTOREMOVE (E) EXISTING PLANTER BOX EXISTING FUTURE /APPLIANCE/ WALL CAD, TO REMOVE �RENGFENCE TO BE REMOVED VF�C-2 NEW DOOR MSRNG LANDSCAPING AREA _—_ IT - II \\ II � Existing Ground Floor Plan/ Demolition Plan I EXISTING DOOR TO REMOVE Total Existing Residence: 1,288 sf � Total Existing Residence Lot Area: 7,820 sf I ISTI N G FLOO P L A INJ D L M OIL 21618 Lost River Drive, Diamond Bar, California 91765 0 2 4 8 Scale: J"=1'-0' A 1 copyright ® REMOVE/ RE -FRAME. SEE PROPOSEDFLOOR PLAN/ BLDG SECTION/ W. ELEVATIONS (E) DUTCH GABEL TO REMOVE urEaecwwwna�-------------- ----------'1 i I I I I I I I I I I Existing Roof Plan Scale: 1/8"=1'-0" (E) DUTCH GABEL TO REMOVE Revision 1: 12.07.2015 Revision 2: 01.12.2016 Revision 3: Revision 4: Revision 5: Revision 6: Revision 7: Revision 8: Revision 9: Revision 10: Revision 11: Revision 12: Revision & Planning Dept Revision Revision ZA Planning Dept Revision Revision Revision Revision Revision Revision Revision Revision Revision Revision Revision EXISTING FRONT (E) DUTCH GABEL TO REMOVE (E) DUTCH GABEL TO REMOVE EXISTING RIGHT (E) DUTCH GABEL TO REMOVE I i I I I t I I I I I I � I i I SEE DEMOLITION PLAN (E) WOODEN TRELLIS I I I I I l i (E) WOODEN TRELLIS I I I I TO REMOVE I I I11 i TO REMOVE I it 1 I I I T.OP. T -0-P.-1— i fill III i ? . i ? I If lit ? 1 _? � r--- _—� ---- --------�--- � --- _----_ II it II Ir-- r--�i I I i t I III I I I II II II II II II I I I I I I I ( I I I I 4 11 1 I i I 11 it II _ ------ I I II II II I I I II II II —III I I I I I I I I I I > AA � `J S I II i III ii III g i I I I IL II it I I I i t 11 I I I i it II I II II II II IL II it I II it I I I II it it (L— J Ii I II I ( ( I I �(E)SRICCO TO REMAIN a+ = NEW PAM PER OWNERS SPEC. TIT'. I I I I i __j I I I ISI I I 11 1 11 EXISTING REAR (E) WNDW TO REMOVE (E) PATIO TO REMOVE D (E) WNDW TO REMOVE (E) WNDW TO REMOVE EXISTING LEFT /X I S T I IN G E X T E R I H W A N G" RES 1 --DE N E REM U100"", D E OL I N G Al no 21618 Lost River Drive, Diamond Bar, California 91765 copyright NATURAL LIGHT AND VENTILATION TABULATION: REQUIRED VENTILATION 1422 SO FT. X.G4= 58.88 SO FT. LIGHT: 1422 SOFT. X.08 113.78 60. FT. PROVIDED FAMILY / DINING ROOM - 5050 SL (VENTILATION -12.5 SO. FT.: LIGHT -25 SO. FT.) 2050 FG (LIGHT -10 SOL FT.) 2D5O FG (UGHT-10 SO. FT.) (2) 3080 FRENCH DOOR (VENTILATION -24 SO. FT.: LIGHT -18 SO. FT.) 6070 ROUND FG (LIGHT -40 SO. FT.) LAUNDRY- ISIS SL VENTILATION - 8 SO. FT; UGHT-16 SO. FT.) LIVING ROOM - 3068 FISERGL (VENTILATION -19.98 SO. FT.) 3818 SL 013618 FG (VENTILATION -7.875 SO. FT.; UGHT- 21 SO. FT.) 3048 SL O1 3878 FG (VENTILATION- 7.875 SO. FT.: UGHT-21 SO. FT.) TOTAL PROVIDED VENTILATION: 104.2] SO. FT. (MEETS REQUIREMENT) TOTAL PROVIDED LIGHT: 175 SO FT. (MEETS REQUIREMENT) N WALL LEGEND / NEW FIXTURE / APPLIANCE / WALL CAB TO INSTALL NEW WALL TO INSTALL 0 EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN EXISTING / NEW WNDW TO REMAIN / INSTALL LINE OF NEW � (N) W70 N 6�SL FIX INWCLLOET II C MASTER RM II W0DO II EOR CL I WOO I x INIDINNGRM CLO wood 4 i o (NLMA5TERRATH 102 CLQ. 14'-4" TILL IN) BEDLAM 20' OR DO E--'= I P)ZW 6'4' I. (P-0' I. 2'-4' V �t�UU�_ -11 rewp _ I II .nL� E AORY eCLG TILE I1 \t---1-- 4 Ile r�� 1 EXISTING/NEW FIXTURE/APPLIANCE/ ® WALL CAB. TO REMAIN I INSTALL Revision 3: EV%m EXISTING I NEW DOOR TO REMAINBNSTALL LINE OF NEW � (N) W70 N 6�SL FIX INWCLLOET II C MASTER RM II W0DO II EOR CL I WOO I x INIDINNGRM CLO wood 4 i o (NLMA5TERRATH 102 CLQ. 14'-4" TILL IN) BEDLAM 20' OR DO E--'= I P)ZW 6'4' I. (P-0' I. 2'-4' V �t�UU�_ -11 rewp _ I II .nL� E AORY eCLG TILE I1 \t---1-- 4 Ile r�� 1 1C --T Revision 2: 01.12.2016 Revision 3: Revision 4: Revision 5: ® ..._....___ Revision 7: (E12 -CAR GARAGE 8: 18 9: Revision eaCLQ. Revision 11: Revision 12: CONC. (gBA2 8ELO TI BEORM3 Revision LE)_LMNG ROOM BR CLQ. WOOD Revision 82 CLG. WOOD Revision Revision Revision I I - --------------------T I (E)MASTER BEGRM Revision Revision I ( I I I W000. IElEHR1Y f E)FOYER enLEG' I ) (q 15870 SECTIONAL GARAGE DOOR I—EXISTING JENCE AND GATE TO REMAIN (q EXISTING PLANTER 80X Proposed Ground Floor Plan ' WOOD FENCE TO BE REMOVED. Toil New Addition: 1,425 sf NEW FENCE 14060 GATE TO - Total Existing Residence:1,288 sf I MATCH RIGHT FENCErATE EXISTING LANDSCAPING Total New Residence: 2,713 sf AREA KEYNOTES tDOUBLE SINK IATTH GARBAGE DISPOSAL DISHWASHER (24WDE X 2C DEEP W/ AIR GAP) VERIFY DIMENSIONS WITH MANUFACTURER. O REFRIGERATOR (PROVIDE RECESSED COLD WATER BIB AND SHUT-OFF FOR ICE -MAKER )WI PRE -PLUMB REVERSE OSMOSIS ® BUILT-IN MICROWAVE AND SINGLE OVEN O 2X6PLUMBWGWALL O 42' RAISED BREAKFAST BAR VW 16' OVERHANG aj (M TANKLESS WATER HEATER IJ Z2"X30'ATTIC ACCESS MIN. WITH 30- MIN CLEAR HEADROOM PROVIDED FAU MAY PASS THROUGH PER THE CRC. PROVIDE SWITCH UGHT,IIDV OUTLET AND 24" PLATFORM TO FAIL. PROVIDEAVINYL FOAM WEATHER -SEAL TO COMPLY W/ CEC. 0 RECESSED MEDICINE CABINET t0 48-X88' HOT MOPPED TILE AND SEAT W/ B'4T(MIN.) CERAMIC TILE SURROUND OVER APPROVED BACKERS WI TEMPERED GLASS SHOWER ENCLOSURE CONTROL VALVES TO BE PRESSURE BALANCED OR THERMOSTATIC MIXING VALVES PER THE CPC. 11 2X6 FLAT BLOCKING AT "0' ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR FOR 24' WIDE TOWEL. BAR. 12 WATER CLOSET PE301 WIDE 21- DEEP CLEAR SPACE CENTERED ON FRONT NOTES i. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR INTERIOR FINISHES. 2. ALL GLAZING SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CRC AND LOCAL ORDINANCES. REFER TO THE ENERGY CODE COMPLLANCE REPORT FOR'U' VALUE OF ALL GLAZING. 3.REFER TO GENERAL NOTE SHEETS FOR THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION METHODS AND CONDITIONS. 4. ALL EXTERIOR DOORS OF CONDITIONED SPACES SHALL BE FULLY WEATHER STRIPPED. S. CEILING AND SOFFIT HEIGHTS INDICATED ON PLANS ARE NOMINAL DIMENSIONS. CEILING HEIGHTS NOTED AS TO WILL HAVE A ROUGH FRAMED HEIGHT OF T -l'. T-0' CLEAR FINISHED OPENING IS REQUIRED PER THE CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE 8. BUILDER SHALL VERIFY W/ WINDOW MANUFACTURER IMT ALL ESCAPE OR RESCUE WINDOWS HAVE MINIMUM NET CLEAR OPENABLE AREA OF 5.7 SQUARE FEET. THE MINIMUM CLEAR OPANABLE HEIGHT DIMENSION SHALL BE 24 INCHES. THE MINIMUM NET CLEAR OPENABLE WIDTH DIMENSION SHALL BE 20 INCHES AND HAVEA FINISHED SILL HEIGHT NOT MORE THAN 44 INCHES ABOVE THE FLOOR PER THE CRC. GRADE FLOOR OPENINGS SHALL HAVE MIN. NET CLEAR OPENING OF 6 SF. PER THE CRC EXCEPTION WINDOWS NOT MEETING THESE REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE BROUGHTTO THE IMMEDIATE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT. REFER TO DETAIL 1843-2 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 7. VENTING SYSTEMS SHALL TERMINATE AT LEAST(4)FEETFROMA PROPERTY UNE PER THE CMC. BUILDING DEPARTMENT NOTES: 1. THE STREET ADDRESS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE BUILDING IN SUCH A POSITION TO BE PLAINLY LEGIBLE FROM STREET FRONTING THE PROPERTY. 2. SEE ENERGY CODE COMPLIANCE REPORT FOR INSULATION VALUES. 3. EXCEPT WHERE OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE CRC ALL FOAM PLASTIC OR FOAM PLASTIC CORES IN MANUFACTURED ASSEMBLIES USED IN BUILDING CONSTRUCTION SHALL HAVE A FLAME -SPREAD RATING OF NOT MORETHAN 76 AND SHALL HAVE A SMOKE -DEVELOPED RATING OF NOT MORE THAN 450 WHEN TESTED IN THE MAXIMUM THICKNESS INTENDED FOR USE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E B4. FOAM PLASTICS AS SPECIFIED IN THE CRC MAY BE USED AS AN INTERIOR COMPONENT OF EXTERIOR WALLS OR PROJECTION, EXTERIOR DECORATIVE TRIM SHALL NOT PROJECT MORE THAN 4 INCHES INTO THE MINIMUM FIRE SEPARATION DISTANCEAND SHALL NOT EXCEED TEN PERCENT OF THE AGGREGATE WALL AREA ON WHICH IT IS LOCATED. SECTION R316.3 AS AMENDED. TOTAL THICKNESS OF HORIZONTAL PROJECTION SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE EXTERIOR FACE OF SND WALL TO THE EXTERIOR FINISH. WOMM2%4 STUDS AT 16'— U.N.O. ® 2X8 STUDS AT 24-o.c. U.N.O. Q?fljj INTERIOR SOFFIT WERE 2X6 STUDS AT 16-O.c U.N.O. THIN SET BRIMSTONE VENEER WHERE OCCURS 4. IN AREAS WHERE EXPANSIVE OR COLLAPSIBLE SOILS ARE KNOWN TO EXIST, ALL DWELLINGS SHALL HAVE A CONTROLLED METHOD OF WATER DRAINAGE FROM THE ROOFS TO GROUND SURFACE AT LEAST 5 FEET FROM FOUNDATION WALLS TO AN APPROVED DRAINAGE SYSTEM PER THE CRC. S. FIBER -CEMENT, FIBER-MAT REINFORCED CEMENT, GLASS MAT GYPSUM BACKERS OR FIBER -REINFORCED GYPSUM BACKERS IN COMPLIANCE WITH ASTM C 1288, C 1325, C 1178 OR C 1278, RESPECTIVELY, AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURERS, RECOMMENDATIONS SHALL BE USED AS SACKERS FOR WALL TILE IN TUB AND SHOWER AREAS AND WALL PANELS IN SHOWER AREAS. PER THE CRC. 6, GARAGE DOORS SHALL BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH EITHER ASTM E330 OR ANSINASMA 108 AND SHALL MEET THE ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA OF ANSVASTM 108 PER THE CRC 7. COMBUSTION AJR TO FORCED AIR UNIT PER CMC CHAPTER 8. ENVIRONMENTAL AIR DUCTS PER CMC SECTION 504 9. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT LOCATION AND PR07ECTION AGAINST DAMAGE PER CMC 307 SQUARE FOOTAGE EXISTING RESIDENCE SQUARE FOOTAGE 1,288 SF GROUND FLOOR ADDITION (LIVABLE): 1,425 SF TOTALADDITION (LINABLE): 1,425 SF TOTALADDMONIN %: 1.425SF/1,288SF= 111% NEWRESIDENCE SQUARE FOOTAGE 2713 SF Revision 1: 12.07.2015 Revision 2: 01.12.2016 Revision 3: Revision 4: Revision 5: Revision 6: Revision 7: Revision 8: Revision 9: Revision 10: Revision 11: Revision 12: Revision As Planning Dept Revision Revision & Planning Dept Revision Revision Revision Revision Revision Revision Revision Revision Revision Revision Revision 0 2 4 a Scale: A1.4 101C copyright — W O.H. TYP—T — — — — — — — — — — SEE EXT. 3: ELEVATIONS 4: I 5: Z3 6: RIOG 7: AREA OF NEW ROOF AT 8: Revision NEWADDITION. SEEP OPOSED FLOOR Revision 10: PLAW BLDG SECTIONI EXT. 11: Revision ELEVATIONS J Revision Planning Dept Revision Revision Revision Revision AREA OF CALIFORNIA OVERFRAME, SEE PROPOSED FLOOR PLAM EXT. ELEVATIONS ROOF LINE — BUILDING LINE 4:12 ROOF PITCHI MATCH TO EXISTING. TYP. 1 Ir EAVE, TYPJ MATCH TO EXISTING. TYP. a - RAKE, TYP. U.N.O. L (N)GATEIFENCE PROPOSED FRONT J.IING CHIMNEY TO –EXISTING CHIMNEY TO MN–J!j— — — — J Proposed Roof Plan Scale: 1/8"=1'-0" --5;; —(N)24X24*C>CTAGON mom Lliz I !�'l 1112. MR IN 10111M - mj I a iL IP NOTE.' ALL ELEVATION TO MATCH M(lNDOW STYLE- WINDOW INSTALLATION,R PLASTER. AND EAVE I FASCIA;DEPTH.I L 4'.0*1 L-�(N)STONEMEER 'WEEP SCREW, TV. I L–L(N)STUXOQfFOAMMM PROPOSED RIGHT O Revision 1: 12.07.2015 Revision 2: 01,12.2016 Revision 3: Revision 4: Revision 5: Revision 6: Revision 7: Revision 8: Revision 9: Revision 10: Revision 11: Revision M Revision & Planning Dept Revision Revision Planning Dept Revision Revision Revision Revision Revision Revision Revision Revision Revision Revision Revision (N) STONE (N)STUCCO 4-2* PROPOSED REAR PROPOSED LEFT X T E R 1 0 Rl E 2 4 a L E V A T 1 0 IkNJS 0 R Ou"N F P L A N i i i ---d Scale: 1'=I* -0" HWA-N-G RESIDENCE REMUP"DELING Al .5 1 21618 Lost River Drive, Diamond Bar, California 91765 1 0.0 copyright CITY OF DIAMOND BAR - 21810 COPLEY DRIVE - DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 - TEL. (909) 839-7030 - FAX (909) 861-3117 UTCIXZN�� 1ENINT11001:10 MEETING DATE: CASE/FILE NUMBER: PROJECT LOCATION: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION ZONING DISTRICT: APPLICANT: SUMMARY: im March 8, 2016 Development Review No. PL2015-101 2651 Braided Mane Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 (APN 8713-036-033) Rural Residential (RR) Rural Residential (RR) Harry Ou 13768 Rosewall Ave. Chino, CA 91710 Jay S. Crawford 470 Wald Irvine, CA 92618 The applicant is requesting approval of a Development Review application to construct a new 6,269 square -foot, multi-level, single-family residence with an attached 819 square -foot and a 3 -car garage on a 1.15 gross acres lot. Adopt the attached Resolution (Attachment 1) approving Development Review No. PL2015-101, based on the findings of Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Section 22.48, subject to conditions. The project site is located in the Diamond Bar Country Estates (The Country), on the west side of Braided Mane Drive, south of the intersection with Shady Ridge Lane and Broken Feather Road. The rectangular shaped property is undeveloped and slopes downward from the street at a 44 percent average grade to the rear of the parcel. The hillside property is densely vegetated with a native chaparral; however, there are no protected trees on the lot. The property is legally described as Lot 14 of Tract No. 30092, and the Assessor's Parcel Number (APN) is 8713-036-033. The proposed single-family house consists of the following site plan and architectural components: Site Plan The property's gross lot area is 50,094 square feet (1.15 acres), which includes a 30 -foot wide private street easement for Braided Mane Drive along its frontage and a 12 -foot wide flood hazard area along the rear property line. The property's net buildable area (i.e., minus all easements) is 43,124 square feet (0.99 acres). The house is situated toward the front of the lot at a minimum of 30 feet from the edge of the street easement line. A series of retaining walls and significant grading at the front and center of the property will create level pads to facilitate the development of the house an * d useable open space at the rear of the home, which will include a swimming pool, spa, outdoor BBQ area, a fire pit, and other landscape and hardscape surface areas. The applicant's licensed landscape architect, Terry Design, has identified the existing hillside chaparral as containing various shrub species on the property=including Chamise, Salvia, California Lilac, Manzanita, California Sagebrush, Buckwheat, Coyote Brush, Gooseberry and Currant, and Monkey Flowers—that are not considered protected trees. Landscaping is proposed throughout the front and rear of the house to enhance the architecture and to create an overall landscape design that harmonizes with the neighboring homes and surrounding natural environment. In addition, the landscape plan is proposed to comply with the City's updated Water Efficient Landscaping Ordinance and will use drought tolerant planting to minimize irrigation within the new landscaped areas to comply with Governor Brown's Executive Order B-29-15 related to significantly reducing the area of turf and sod ground cover planting. The applicant is proposing a series of 12, four -foot high tiered retaining walls in the middle of the property to create a minimum 27 -foot rear level pad to comply with the City's development standards of a minimum 25 -foot rear setback; and a series of two retaining walls at the front of the property to facilitate the split-level pad development. All exposed portions of retaining walls will be textured split -face decorative block, and capped with an appropriate material (i.e., stone or concrete). Architecture The proposed multi-level house is located toward the front portion of the property. The home consists of the following components: A 2,207 square -foot upper level consisting of four bedrooms, each with a bathroom and closet; laundry room; and office area; A 2,605 square -foot ground (street) level consisting of an entry foyer area, dining room, family room, kitchen with nook and living room having access to outdoor spaces; Development Review No. PL 2015-101 Page 2 of 8 A 1,457 square -foot lower level consisting of an exercise/gym room, sifting area with wet -bar, and a guest room with bath and walk-in closet; e 485 square feet of deck/balcony areas; and e An 819 square -foot, attached three -car garage. The multi-level home is internally accessed by one staircase and an elevator. The height of the building is W-10.5", measured from the finished grade to the highest point of the roofline. The architectural style of the home is Modern with a flat roof; smooth textured stucco, wood siding, and ledgestone stone veneer walls; and bronze window framing throughout the fenestration pattern. The applicant has obtained approval from The Diamond Bar Country Estates Architectural Committee. Front (Northwest) Perspective The following table describes the surrounding land uses located adjacent to the subject property: Site Rural Residential RR Single -Family Residential North Rural Residential RR Single -Family Residential South Rural Residential RR Single -Family Residential East Rural Residential RR Single -Family Residential West Rural Residential RR Single -Family Residential Development Review No. PL 2015-101 Page 3 of 8 14, a O,MZ?NMFMEMR Maliil�!11:, The proposed project requires Planning Commission review and approval of a Development Review (DR) application. The analysis that - follows provides the basis for staffs recommendation to approve the DR application. New construction of a single-family home requires Planning Commission approval of a Development -Review application. Development Review approval is required to ensure compliance with the City's General Plan policies, development standards, and design guidelines, and to minimize adverse effects of the proposed project upon the surrounding properties and the City in general. As stated in Section 22.48.010 of the Development Code, the Development Review process was established to ensure that new development and additions to existing development, are consistent with the General Plan "through the promotion of high functional and aesthetic standards to complement and add to the economic, physical, and social character" of Diamond Bar. Development Standards: The following table compares the proposed project with the City's development standards for residential development in the RR zone: Site and Grading Configuration: The project site is located on a rectangular shaped property with a descending 44 percent average slope to the rear of the parcel. The applicant is proposing to cut 700 cubic yards of soil and fill 2,400 cubic yards of soil to create split-level Development Review No. PL 2015-101 Page 5 of 8 pads and expand the buildable pad behind the home within the front half of the property. Therefore, approximately 1,700 cubic yards would have to be imported to the site. Standard dump truck capacities range from 10 to 15 cubic yards, so the proposed amount of import would require between 113 and 170 hauls (57 to 85 total truck trips). The site is located on undisturbed grade and will be modified to allow for split-level pads for the lower and street level floor areas. A series of 12, four -foot high tiered retaining walls will be constructed to accommodate the additional pad area in the rear yard to comply with the City's development standard for a rear setback; and a series of two retaining walls at the front of the property to facilitate the split-level pad development. Architectural Features, Colors, and Materials: The architectural style is Modern. The applicant designed the project to have a variety of architectural elements to reflect the architectural style, including the following design features: ® A flat mineral roofing membrane; • Smooth textured stucco, wood siding and ledgestone stone veneer walls; • Bronze window framing throughout the fenestration pattern; ® Steel and cable guardrail at balconies; and ® Natural colors used to highlight architectural details and integrate with the landscape. The applicant is proposing to use a variety of colors and materials to create character and articulation. The scale and proportions of the proposed home are well balanced and appropriate for the site. The project incorporates the principles of the City's Residential Design Guidelines as follows: The new single-family residence will conform to all development standards, including building height and setbacks, which is consistent with other homes in The Country Estates; ® A gradual transition between the project and adjacent uses is achieved through appropriate setbacks, building height, landscaping, and window and door placement; ® The proposed new single-family residence is appropriate in mass and scale to the site; ® Elevations are treated with detailed architectural elements; ® Roof lines are representative of the design and scale of the structure through vertical and horizontal articulations such as the flat roof pitches; Proper screening for ground and roof -mounted equipment is architecturally compatible with the dwelling in terms of materials, color, shape, and size and blends in with the proposed building design; ® Large wall expanses without windows or doors are avoided; ® The exterior finish materials and colors blend with the natural environment; and Landscaping is used to emphasize and highlight focal points such as gardens, patios and walkways. Development Review No. PL 2015-101 Page 6 of 8 Landscaping: Landscaping is used to soften the look of the paved surfaces, enhance the architecture, and create an overall site design that blends in with neighboring homes and the natural environment of the site. In the front yard, three 36 -inch box Pink Trumpet trees will be planted along the front center portion of the property (street easement) line and three 36 -inch box California fan palm trees will be added along the southern side of the driveway leading towards the garage. Also, a variety of groundcover and shrubs will be planted in the front yard. All plant types will be drought tolerant and non-invasive species. The project is required to comply with the City's updated Water Efficient Landscaping Ordinance, which is noted on the preliminary landscape plans and will be verified during building plan check and final inspections. The subject property is located within the Los Angeles County Fire Department "High Fire Hazard Severity Zone." Therefore, the proposed landscaping must comply with the Fire Department's Fuel Modification Plan requirements. The landscape plans will be submitted for review and approval by the Fire Department during building plan check. TR1741N= The proposed project was reviewed for compliance with the City's Hillside Management Design Guidelines and regulations. The project complies with all of the regulations and guidelines to ensure- that development will, complement the character and topography of hillside areas set forth in the Development Code. The project site was designed with: All proposed retaining walls associated with the building pads are at a maximum exposed height of four feet; Earth tone building materials and color schemes are used that blend in with the natural landscape; and The project is terraced on split-level pads. From the street view, the building has an appearance of a predominantly two-story structure, but the rear of the building steps down to three floor levels. The project complies with all of the regulations and guidelines to ensure that development will complement the character and topography of hillside areas set forth in the Development Code. The proposed project complies with the goals and objectives as set forth in the adopted General Plan in terms of land use and density. The project is designed to be compatible with and enhance the character of the existing homes .in the neighborhood. The new house will not be intrusive to neighboring homes and will not block existing views from adjacent properties since the home will be situated towards the front of the property, in-line with the adjacent homes. Although homes on the east side of Braided Mane Dr. are at a slightly higher elevation than the subject property, they will experience partial (slot) views of the rolling hills in the background, looking west, as opposed to panoramic views currently enjoyed. In comparison to other homes in the community, the proposed house is less grandiose than many recently approved and constructed homes on similar size lots in The Country Estates, Development Review No. PL 2015-101 Page 7 of 8 and the Modern design is among the least common architectural styles found (one notable example of the Modern style is the "Bicentennial House" at 22702 Timbertop Lane, commissioned by the Transamerica Corporation and completed in 1970). Nevertheless, The Country is characterized by an eclectic mix of architectural styles, and the proposed design is thus appropriate. The Public Works Department and Building and Safety Division reviewed this project, and their comments are included in the attached resolution as conditions of approval. On February 25, 2016, public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 1,000 -foot radius of the project site. On February 26, 2016, the notice was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers. A notice display board was posted at the site, and a copy of the notice was posted at the City's three designated community posting sites. No comments have been received as of the publication date of this report. A -UTA This project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on that assessment, the City has determined the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to the provisions of Article 19 Section 15303(a) (new construction of a single-family residence) of the CEQA Guidelines. No further environmental review is required. Prepared by: Josue Espino Planning Consultant Attachments: Reviewed by: rn Le)- Senior Planner 1. Draft Resolution No. 2016 -XX and Standard Conditions of Approval 2. Site Plan, Floor Plans, Elevations, Landscape Plans, and Conceptual Grading Plans Development Review No. PL 2015-101 Page 8 of 8 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2016 -XX A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. PL2015-101 TO CONSTRUCT A NEW 6,269 SQUARE -FOOT, MULTI- LEVEL, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH AN ATTACHED 819 SQUARE - FOOT, 3 -CAR GARAGE ON A 1.15 GROSS ACRES LOT LOCATED ' AT 2651 BRAIDED MANE DRIVE, DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 (APN 8713-036- 033). A. RECITALS 1. The property.owner, Harry Ou, and applicant, Jay S. Crawford, have filed an application for Development -Review No. PL2015-1 01 to construct a new. 6,269 square -foot, multi-level, single-family residence with an attached - .819square-foot, 3 -car garage located at 2651 Braided Mane Drive, Diamond Bar, County of Los Angeles, California. 2. The subject property is. made up of one parcel totaling 50,094 gross square feet (1.15 -gross acres). It is located in the Rural Residential (RR) zone with an undn erlyi' g General Plan land use designation of Rural Residential.., The legal description of the subject property is Lot 14 of Tract 30002. The Assessor's, ii'Number is 8713-036-033. P arce :4 On Februbry25, 2016, public hearing notices were mailed to propprt y" owners within a 1.,000 -foot radius of the Project site and were posted at the Project site and the City's three -designated community posting sites-.- On -February 26, 2016, notification of the public hearing for this project.was.,:,.. published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers. f th Diamond Bar..--:..' 5..... On March 8, 2016, the Planning Commission o e City of Diamo 'conducted. a.,dUly noticed public h all. hearing, solicited testimony. from. .,interested indiv'iduals, and concluded hearing on that date. B. RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, it is. found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: 1. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct; and impose a line of sight from the subject property to the adjacent properties to the north and south due to orientation of the home and large wall projections. The proposed single-family house will not interfere with vehicular or pedestrian movements, such as access or other functional requirements of a single-family home because it complies with the requirements for driveway widths and exceeds the minimum number of required off-street parking spaces. 3. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain and enhance the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22.48: Development Review Standards, the City's Design Guidelines, the City's General Plan, or any applicable specific plan; The new single-family home is designed to be compatible with the character of the eclectic neighborhoods in The Country Estates. It is designed in a Modem style of architecture with earth -tone shades for the exterior finish to soften the building's visual impact and assist in preserving the hillside's aesthetic value. As mentioned, the proposed upper level balcony area located at the rear of the home will have views towards the rear of the property and will not readily impose a line of sight from the subject property to the adjacent properties to the north and south due to orientation of the home and large wall projections. Therefore, the private open spaces will be sensitive to adjacent properties and the new home will be visually integrated into the existing streetscape and not negatively impact the look and character of the neighborhood. 4. The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, color, and will remain aesthetically appealing; The design of. the new -single-family home is reminiscent of Modem influences. Consistent by ' ilding elements have been achieved through the utilization of similar architectural features and building materials. The new home will not be intrusive to neighboring homes and will be aesthetically appealing by integrating a variety of materials, such as a flat mineral roofing membrane; smooth textured stucco, wood siding and ledg ' estone stone veneer walls; and bronze window framing throughout the fenestration pattern. Earth -tone shades for the exterior finish are used .to soften the building's visual impact and assist in preserving the hillside's aesthetic value. Also, landscaping is integrated into the site to complement the 3 DR PL2015-101 The Planning Commission shall: a. Certify to the'adoption of this Resolution; and b. Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail to the property owner, Harry Ou, 13768 Rosewall Ave., Chino, CA 91710, and applicant, Jay S. Crawford, 470 Wald, Irvine, CA 92618. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8th DAY OF MARCH 2016, BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. 12 1, Greg Gubman, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of March, 2016, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: ABSTAIN: Commissioners: ATTEST: Greg Gubman, Secretary 5 DR PL2015-101 (b) Applicant shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against the City defendants. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action of proceeding, and shall cooperate fully in the defense thereof. 2. This approval shall not be effective for any purpose until the applicant and owner of the property involved have filed, within twenty-one (21) days of approval of this Development Review No. PL2015-101, at the City of Diamond Bar Community Development Department, their affidavit stating that they are aware of and agree to accept all the conditions of this approval. Further, this approval shall not be effective until the applicants pay remaining City processing fees, school fees and fees for the review of submitted reports. 3. All designers, architects, engineers, and contractors associated with this project shall obtain a Diamond Bar Busines's License; and a zoning approval for those businesses located in Diamond Bar. 4. Signed copies of Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016 -XX, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 5. Prior to the plan check, revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval. 6. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval shall be completed. 7. The project site shall be maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of approval and all laws, or other applicable regulations. 8. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and any applicable Specific Plan in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 9. All site, grading, landscape/irrigation, and roof plans, and elevation plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of City permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.,) or approved use has commenced whichever comes first. 10. The property owner/applicant shall remove the public hearing notice board within three days of this project's approval. 11. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of City Planning, Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works Department, and the Fire Department. 7 DR PL2015-1 01 5. Failure to comply with any of the conditions set forth above or as subsequently amended in writing by the City, may result in failure to obtain a building final and/or a certificate of occupancy until full compliance is reached. The City's requirement for full compliance may require minor corrections and/or complete demolition of a non-compliant improvement, regardless of costs incurred where the project does not comply with design requirements and approvals that the applicant agreed to when permits were pulled to construct the project. 6. The project site shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the approved plans submitted to, approved, and amended herein by the Planning Commission, on file with the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 7. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, air conditioning condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berms, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Division. 8. All roof -mounted equipment shall be screened from public view. 9. All structures, including walls, trash enclosures, canopies, etc., shall be maintained in a structurally sound, safe manner with a clean, orderly appearance. All graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours by the property owners/occupant. 10. All landscaping, structures, architectural features and public improvements damaged during construction shall be repaired or replaced upon project completion. E. SOLID WASTE 1. The site shall be maintained in a condition, which is free of debris both during and after the construction, addition, or implementation of the entitlement approved herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether during or subsequent to construction shall be done only by the property owner, applicant or by a duly permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste from residential, commercial, construction, and industrial areas within the City. It shall be the applicant's obligation to insure that the waste contractor used has obtained permits from the City of Diamond Bar to provide such services. 2. Mandatory solid waste disposal services shall be -provided by the City franchised waste hauler to all parcels/lots or uses affected by approval of this project. 9 DR PL2015-101 APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, (909) 839-7040, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: An Erosion Control Plan shall be submitted concurrently with the grading plan clearly detailing erosion control measures. These measures shall be implemented during construction. The erosion control plan shall conform to national Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards and incorporate the appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP's) as specified in the Storm Water BMP Certification. For construction activity which disturbs one acre or greater soil a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be needed. 2. A new single-family hillside home development project shall include mitigation measures to: (i) Conserve natural areas; (ii) Protect slopes and channels; (iii) Provide storm drain system stenciling and sighage; (iv) Divert roof runoff to vegetated areas before discharge unless the diversion would result in slope instability; and (v) Direct surface flow to vegetated areas before discharge, unless the diversion would result in slope instability. 3. Grading and construction activities and the transportation of equipment and materials and operation of heavy grading equipment shall be limited to between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. Dust generated by grading and construction activities shall be reduced by watering the soil prior to and during the activities and in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 402 and Rule 403. Reclaimed water shall be used whenever possible. Additionally, all construction equipment shall be properly muffled to reduce noise levels. Prior to grading plan submittal, a geotechnical report prepared by a Geotechnical Engineer, licensed by the State of California, shall be submitted by the applicant for approval by the City. 2. Upon approval of the geotechnical report, the applicant shall submit drainage and grading plans prepared by a Civil Engineer, licensed by the State of California, prepared in accordance with the City's requirements for the City's review and approval. A list of requirements for grading plan check is available from the Public Works Department. All grading (cut and fill) calculations shall be submitted to the City concurrently with the grading plan. 11 DR PL2015-101 1 Detailed drainage system information of the lot with careful attention to any flood hazard area shall be submitted. All drainage/runoff from the development shall be conveyed from the site to the natural drainage course. No on-site drainage shall be conveyed to adjacent parcels, unless that is the natural drainage course. 2. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a complete hydrology and hydraulic study shall be prepared by a Civil Engineer registered in the State of California to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. D. SEWERS/SEPTIC TANK 1. * Applicant shall obtain connection permit(s) from the City and County Sanitation District prior to issuance of building permits. 2. Any homeowner that installs a new septic tank system, repairs and existing septic tank or adds any plum ' bing fixture units or bedroom equivalents to the facility served by an existing septic system will need to submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to the Regional Water Quality Control Board for Waste Discharge Requirements and submit a copy of the sent NOI and check to the City prior to grading permit issuance. 3. Applicant, at applicant's sole cost and expense, shall construct the sewer system in accordance with the City. Sewer plans shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for review and approval by the City. 4. SEPTIC TANK: The Applicant shall show septic tanks location, size and details on the plans. The Los Angeles County Health Department, California Water Control Board and the City's Geotechnical Engineer shall approve these plans prior to the issuance of any permits. The property owner shall be required to sign and record the City's Covenant for use of a septic system. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 839-7020, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: At the time of plan check submittal, plans and construction shall conform to current State and Local Building Code (i.e., 2013 California Building Code series will apply) requirements and all other applicable construction codes, ordinances and regulations in effect. 2. Provisions for Cal Green shall be implemented onto plans and certification shall be provided by a third party as required by the Building Division. Specific water, waste, low VOC, and related conservation measures shall be shown on plans. Construction shall conform to the current Cal Green Code. 13 DR PL2015-101 e. Fuel modification plans shall be approved through Los Angeles County Fire Fuel Modification Unit. f. Los Angeles County Fire shall approve plans for fire flow availability due to home being over 3600 sf as required per CFC Appendix B105.1. 10. All retaining walls shall be separately submitted to the Building and Safety and Public Works/Engineering Departments for review and approval. 11. A soils report is required per CBC 1803 and all recommendations of the soils report shall be adhered to. 12. Slope setbacks shall be consistent with California Building Code Figure 1805.3.1 and California Residentibi Code R403.1.7. Foundations shall provide a minimum distance to daylight. 13. Light and ventilation shall comply with CBC 1203 and 1205. & 1 Solid waste management of construction material shall incorporate recycling material collection per Diamond Bar Municipal Code 8.16 of Title 8. The contractor shall complete all required forms and pay applicable deposits prior to permit. 2. Prior to building permit issuance, all school district fees shall be paid. Please obtain a form from the Building and Safety Division to take directly to the school district. 3. Submit grading plans clearly showing all finish elevations, drainage, and retaining wall locations. No building permits shall be issued prior to submitting a pad certification. 4. Private property sewer/septic system shall be approved by the Los Angeles County Health Department and the California Water Control Board. 5. SCAQMD notification is required at least 10 days prior to any demolition. Proof of notification is required at permit issuance. 6. All workers on the job shall be covered by workman's compensation insurance under a licensed general contractor. Any changes to the contractor shall be updated on the building permit. D. CONSTRUCTION — CONDITIONS REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION 1. Fire sprinklers are required for new single family dwellings (CRC R313.2). Sprinklers shall be approved by LA County Fire Department prior to installation and shall be inspected at framing stage and finalization of construction. 15 DR PL2015-101 14. Decks, roofs, and other flat surfaces shall slope at least 1/4"/ft with approved and listed water proofing material. Guardrails shall be provided for these surfaces at least 42" minimum in height, 4" maximum spacing between rails, and capable of resisting at least 20 pounds per lineal foot of lateral load. 15. Bodies of water that are greater than 18" in depth shall have the required barriers to prevent unintentional access per CBC 3904.4. 16. Special inspections and structural observation will be required in conformance with CBC 1704 to 1709. 17. - Geotechnical inspection of the retaining wall and foundation systems shall be provided to the satisfaction of the building inspector and the Public Works Department prior to pouring of concrete or grout. 18. All roof drains shall have an overflow 2" above the roof drain on an independent line. 17 DR PL2015-1 01 DRAWN All rCFIEOKEO DATE l-14 — ®GALE OF SHE, 0 UJ u ui ol U5 go' < C� U < Q ox "A� "AW 7OCKa 0 OATS B=LM 400 No. n;q: o--- ------ oo �—�dz�r�.... o Laflr-u ro tt 12GO� G - f - OOAWN '"*C,o 0 IA TM Jom tic. E eky&�d,. e� L Uja y�/ Z W'< „e •®" "•" US z uj in 0 W, 4 0 a 7 MGAWN ��CN®CKOD Mara ` i / 11 -Mo n Joe No. 1 aMaGT 1 4 MF aML�MTO Ou Resid General Exterior Plast i Texture; 2030 Sand Fin! Color. DEW 345White Manufacturer. Dmm-Ed Stone: Color. Southwest Blend Manufacturer. Culture ; Windows & Expo3ed Color. Bronze Clad Manufoeturer. Fleetwoa Ratting: Color. Stainless Steel C Manufacturer. House of Woad: Color. Olympic #729 Manufacturer. Olympic Roof- Co,_lor White •Manufactu er, Certainta M, i . d 00 a; `0•cO Ii N P Q co to ��. CVzQ U .0 U 01 U� �} 01 T ;rteT ot,J Material Color Board On Residence, Diamond Bar Lot 14 Tract 30092 BY I General Exurior Plaster- � Texture: 2030 Sand Finish Color. DEW 345' Wldte Fever, LVR 84 Manufacturer Duma -Edwards Paint Stone: Color. Southwest Blend .. Mamtfectmer. Culture Stone CO LOA i Windows & Exposed Steel: l N L} Color. Bronze Clad — Manufacturer. Fleetwood C p i L i Balling: O • - 0 or Stainless Steel Cable RaU OE42 Manuf exrer House of Stainless Wood: _ Color. Olympic M9 Manufacturer: Olympic WU CO Roof: ~ Z c!� co a Color White ` t V0 Manufacturer Cettainteed Flinmstic SA ' o� 9 1W03- — O .... Tac • _ I I I •tt4Z. r�.�.-7.�e'�_=��rwta. ��1C1�"ilii(; - 1 •a��r�.- ✓ �i�'. �� �„i.►..+iii fes: un...e.r. .-.",..i�'r��. iii r i� uIII I III ki"No RGVItIIIt7iVB BY CO LOA Q N L} Q L C Z01. P O �X WU CO ~ Z c!� co a U V0 �Q o� Tir CRAWN CMMCKMC OATH �lIOAiMO�i JOM NO. ®MMMT IL OP MMMpT6 SEPTIC SYSTEM DESIGN SEPTIC SYSTEM PLAN �( �1i6:'tE'1G"'E,?9:.,ui'�: }r;'' •. ., '. I wNr W. ` T J: l.L� 1 ;ndo�`�i•"..s';d �{> Y'.'..T.2 I - J {�. i.... '`Ii�:�Y,y-. • • '."`.^•;". rn 'LF, }y f :. / •��u:1 n..6i.(d . 1� .`.^e+:-�l.—. yr i.,d;. i`:G P`;�L�3'r✓A r.Amlm-, '1.\\ d • / �'riiC I' R1d. t., i is � I• .f p� Y o . ^f s..9'• • • . • .Y �'c 1,. 'pY"O-:al, .w D'�+; '�•/`.% '.� I. �n �. dY :lyr I..�i2,0 i. � `{ %art-.u".§,lY�•p7"=,..�,l./��,�^:�;�./\�:\` �L' '.. C I �' �t `�!`� ! 1 orf wl^�,T, "�zt `I..'.. �'Y'tk;• . •.o � • { - _ �i � R - C f , ' Pk.t�' , . Y, � 'q••,•! �� � i � I..•'�'1 is ` -Mv s I i i I i `', '\\5, n• r.""' (.,, y Rei„!"'t r. at 5•• '... , J I y FOR ' 1008 DEM/{ND I. � j ` `.i ±\ A. �0+�. ` r� a -pt Y� •td `✓XE I I 1 EXPANSION ` Ir .. r r r r•LallQIB111, ii1N_QlY2 2;000'GAL (ESTIAVTE) PRELIMINARY SEPTIC SYSTEM L�►YOUT 20 0 20 40 60 LEGEND a SCALE: 1"=20' PARCEL BOUNDARY PR 4” SDR 35 PVC PIPE EDGE OF LEACH TRENCH R 4" SDR 35 PERFORATED PVC PIP DIG T W DIAL TOIL F-12EE 1 (800) 227-2600 Least Two Working D.,S Before YOU O,. UNDFAGROUHD SERVICE ALERT OF SWTIiERN CALIFORNIA OPnoNAI 24' CAST IRai PING @ COVER AND RISERS TO GRADE �R—p a t ,rte '• . P E INYEAT K -r SIDE VIEW 3•-p. A._�. CUTAWAY 1� TOP VIEW (COVERS REMOVED) I :UOUID CAPACITY: 2000 GALLONS IO&W EPAYATOI 9E s -Ir i Ir-ir I avnH6nn n TANK DESIGNED FOR H-20 TRAFFICLO AD YATIi DRY Sal CONOWATER TABLE BELOW TANK) EARTH COVER OVER TANK NOT 7TJ EXCEED 5 FT. SUITABLE NATIVE OR SUB -BASE SHALL BE PREPARED TO HANDLE ANTICIPATED LOADS. THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BEDDED WITH SUITABLE GRANULAR MATERIAL AND SHALL Be COMPACTED TO BOX MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY, OR TO REQUIREMENTS OF THE PROJECT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. SEPTIC 'TANI'C DETAIL SCALE NTS SECTION A—A SCALE- 1"=10' PRELIMINARY CONST. NOTES O INSTALL 2000 GALLON DOUBLE CHAMBER CONCRETE SEPTIC TAW JENSEN PRECAST MODEL NO. JS -2000 OR EQUIVALENT WITH 24" DIAMETER CONCRETE RISERS AND 24" DIAMETER CONCRETE ACCESS COVER. 2� INSTALL CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION BOX JENSEN PRECAST MODEL NO, D-5 OR EQUIVALENT. O INSTALL LEACH LINTS WITH 4" PERFORATED SDR35 PVC PIPE WITH HOLES AT THE BOTTOM OVER 3/4" TO 2-1/2" CLEAN CRUSTED ROCK PER LEACH FIELD TRENCH DETAIL THIS SHEET. O INSTALL 4" SDR35 PVC PIPE. WEIGHT- Goa - .Lei COVER- AS IBi -011%03110"w ]/4' COVER ,o- K IV,`mc ,V -,K u L /2' TOP VIEW T PLASnc SECTION A•A FITTSS h�ll�A FIVE — CO.—M DES. 0 GROUT .10 PRODUCT 4\'TORMATION, REWIPW. COWACT .EH PRECAST. 2 DISTRIBUTION BOX DETAIL SCALE NTS BACKFILL WITH NATIVE MATERIAL 2" DEPTH CLEAN MEDIUM AGGREGATE SAND BED NONWOVEN FILTER FABRIC MIRAFI N -SERIES 16ON OR EQUIVALENT 4" SDR 35 PERFORATED PVC PIPE W/ HOLES POINTING DOWN INV PER PLAN 3/4" TO 2-1/2" CRUSHED ROCK CLEANED OF FINES LEACH FIELD TRENCH DETAIL SCALE NTS GENERAL NOTE THIS PLAN IS FOR PRELIMINARY PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY IN ORDER TO ILLUSTRATE WHERE A POTENTIAL SEPTIC SYSTEM MIGHT BE PLACED ON THE PROPERTY. THE ACTUAL DESIGN AND LAYOUT MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM WHAT IS SHOWN ON THIS PRELIMINARY PLAN. I I :UOUID CAPACITY: 2000 GALLONS IO&W EPAYATOI 9E s -Ir i Ir-ir I avnH6nn n TANK DESIGNED FOR H-20 TRAFFICLO AD YATIi DRY Sal CONOWATER TABLE BELOW TANK) EARTH COVER OVER TANK NOT 7TJ EXCEED 5 FT. SUITABLE NATIVE OR SUB -BASE SHALL BE PREPARED TO HANDLE ANTICIPATED LOADS. THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BEDDED WITH SUITABLE GRANULAR MATERIAL AND SHALL Be COMPACTED TO BOX MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY, OR TO REQUIREMENTS OF THE PROJECT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. SEPTIC 'TANI'C DETAIL SCALE NTS SECTION A—A SCALE- 1"=10' PRELIMINARY CONST. NOTES O INSTALL 2000 GALLON DOUBLE CHAMBER CONCRETE SEPTIC TAW JENSEN PRECAST MODEL NO. JS -2000 OR EQUIVALENT WITH 24" DIAMETER CONCRETE RISERS AND 24" DIAMETER CONCRETE ACCESS COVER. 2� INSTALL CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION BOX JENSEN PRECAST MODEL NO, D-5 OR EQUIVALENT. O INSTALL LEACH LINTS WITH 4" PERFORATED SDR35 PVC PIPE WITH HOLES AT THE BOTTOM OVER 3/4" TO 2-1/2" CLEAN CRUSTED ROCK PER LEACH FIELD TRENCH DETAIL THIS SHEET. O INSTALL 4" SDR35 PVC PIPE. WEIGHT- Goa - .Lei COVER- AS IBi -011%03110"w ]/4' COVER ,o- K IV,`mc ,V -,K u L /2' TOP VIEW T PLASnc SECTION A•A FITTSS h�ll�A FIVE — CO.—M DES. 0 GROUT .10 PRODUCT 4\'TORMATION, REWIPW. COWACT .EH PRECAST. 2 DISTRIBUTION BOX DETAIL SCALE NTS BACKFILL WITH NATIVE MATERIAL 2" DEPTH CLEAN MEDIUM AGGREGATE SAND BED NONWOVEN FILTER FABRIC MIRAFI N -SERIES 16ON OR EQUIVALENT 4" SDR 35 PERFORATED PVC PIPE W/ HOLES POINTING DOWN INV PER PLAN 3/4" TO 2-1/2" CRUSHED ROCK CLEANED OF FINES LEACH FIELD TRENCH DETAIL SCALE NTS GENERAL NOTE THIS PLAN IS FOR PRELIMINARY PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY IN ORDER TO ILLUSTRATE WHERE A POTENTIAL SEPTIC SYSTEM MIGHT BE PLACED ON THE PROPERTY. THE ACTUAL DESIGN AND LAYOUT MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM WHAT IS SHOWN ON THIS PRELIMINARY PLAN. 27. An c00mme innn es mm owe in am= with the on -dm Bolls --bill be mmoactd win, lypo-S EROSION CONTROL bTANDARDS -.4 ail® &...d mmaxrasy by ookem. wybmvenmS eta, c,d,m! by He edi mHitem• �p1g nate arx ro ba fectaded no ail,piane wRoroervnbo control iv ralvimi. f'RAOTNG NO7'&S F lee mnfni.nta« 75meomtm arc robe taeltdd on all pimyawhaw ¢.95�7� i. 711 L«s atM ad SH dope endpm}ccidm.heRM papa.,l end aulvolvedmvlitlmrcm «awe creating IS l . in GM r11H be with en ppmmd�brigdme eyaem, unlete vgaksemeianiar«rnteo<a w6h Liam mu>ads. Wbsx m.)q mommryaxmc«mndmm I. All watkduU 6.mr®Nas Mdt begad6tg roda.flha C7yol Diamond em ld anYeped.l dl ao9mlcdtmmdmamm 1161 mmW;a«L=t-111 ®oM opo gipar.i b7 the tegd,mmmufOep�dL lybm mfmm don dnpimd.. capyl[EtdA nmdadpims ddn dao 13ugAon OlaekL PmblhmLgemnddmingtaadlhmmmnsatlan amn,t he prod oadope; 11 b mtm,d ooft g ' tantt dbe be named from M d1 or mad vo-dm m an m..d tocol, ,het in 101 cum 2 C.U.Sdnilno[be mamtwldmul nytmdfyEvntbe Ckyltd(dmgOm•:., Apromedeaomrong emim &.1notBepmm- 'e Ia xeq*w b o,eovi deck . «ne a.,1 mb 2. by tlae . eentman, gWd gidmeteeE, svbysllxmcd andpwideafmy.Smi'®mdmlg.NsU he retalad .ben rcgded be ndnmbgf4 pulmon114 and ubmill. 71e gmHag ramsim mill baa On mdi boonatey or the jeft ftkod fin, d. Tbereuivoll pa,iw C«IPod"mEevld ao wntro 6owdt' up 'Isod�6mmrcUoE• 3. Nebl7di t0«ptdWg+emk wiH 6e allowed oe mq bm'WtraQ ar gmds8 dm aada! mle90o 3. eyiesdda gmduogmd ami, cvmoi pla.dWibvanbapemiittd dewidewah is aedmcetmd sYetmhea bee rpptvvdmdUalDd erwdad 6yti1Hu0dg OSm�h 7l. pogma. I. Poll 4. otbar mv�armH betwuavtoed tae«aaMllmrnodatm Gem 34: Ondeo¢opmdm.inddmgaaidomce degd7ametdlU not TAn moduudbnwmatll fel®of d le-Acoexaib,md inbund • alb me wq mmmdsI ddenemca oh. 9oas R«otl11 m cH'adee dm a. tTt and OD alae. Than be m elope tbm 2-fiml hmimaal m 1•mm wrid (2:1) acne Mme t,eir Ai uwd m v ee5dm Feds m peva mnmmsian rmaB of mm9awr Il� emylvg .dime. ®l Wb and nP-Melly gtiv0vnletlee-i- ddd. onrside da pmJect bamemle. wtamg .bill only 6e uad m elem m.e mupl vela. dt mmdodambbdd and wbm.e w.b.-I. teem-.. No vae>twaormyemr8e.mm S. Rile atng bn amiadd damglambammimma oE90°R tdati+o ABU.Finebeoe- detia. aidde leab a m . adtdmem vf95n abdve mmpecdaL Ofaeim�m dtmily ed . b, ddenpand fielddmdtyeheUb.htmviadbyodiou0yrmmgnimltmadmds pian sbdl be S. 711 dogmgiomraohmdmadm l-fthd dick « T31 teden shill tree de Wended depb of a.vati, ed whee tla -V-d- wet aooanwce. cobe otpegmmi ltpadhie fid 5apavon cod nmdiHuden d the etmim camel deck., a mns�m7. mory.y 6. Awbe«dvv fie shAlboptopdYpmpmd edlppmved in wodmg by 0lm0 mpneepdmth Pheleafa L 37. Wrt9l) to o ate' Henntiogia.m mmt-11 ad'mampriarmdesebl0bg emm creta 7. Pt'IDmagbobcmhdbmeomp-smidperd<miaccas atedirytmallnagi«a. gomdldt. R. AllahliveOO,dmii 6voppm.dbytbcw@mginn•«eemovdPemttoPtednBddidaW OFF- 7. HquiPmcm adr.kme fmmWmcy wmk,he011 vada mnamt,m ell rima. NeeswY oiaxWa 19ml ) dais b, mdI We oa.ia ad aodpged m emvrnim 6Trm1,+ te GeTilmo ogdd oaatavalm of 9. Aty eaI tba lobed, Han cod diems Aug bo>rmoved. or mmbd m Place, and qr. d by W pmmy&M-wbmtamI. roadma eau-ilm«r. oo n eu°oce"®aa ne ems• ,U„ ral m wmeaem. mnrr.trxr a L Etmianlaeboden" noabt doeepemydapembinlgon n,lmW « dl droelwplooft ofdl 10. Tle antuag06cial amg oppmvermckpntae olmmm mdamlpdmm ac0ra6va dopes la m«a of Me (5) kat high alcor odo-ise epp -.d by rho D ldfq Offidnl. Slope tnonaft P.O ImM1 tech aa7 mgocv m mkgode go'v31m qct®. a by do Il. Aga:Ochb=kMb gbe k� d aW Mpm dbygoada agioarp«tbegra coda 0 wela IL Theneek wing gmbgla 11116 e.gmecdall, e0aei®ivg..dpd«mtheplasmmedgB is eayvm,bulwacame,ymantesatdvmest"yaadmdg=dmthept.mee«mama 9. The emotoa mmol ptavbims end ham eaa.ra'dadmg. p- dudes da,nem est fmm a Cmeenicewmerasprtag0ay. tfaadd. wb dsaia.gibe deigoed,d cmm«ud Pim ph-f'snefieserbuildag the ph-entvffillmeKhmpxtiveeavyme, 10.Ali -alt, p -W. device area be m plane ft* end f -.b watkmg dq Nb, the Eve (5) ft rahspdxiMgyfine'itut-edsloony (40)pmcsoL " 11.Otddm.s mmdtdn awry Bommv 6cvefdnpe m d1 roadml, deohawtmg dny. Oaine6, O. Allm clop. bell be mmdmtd bob dmmg and aflor needing by dm mgvlmiog gmbgdt m mmtbedd«1d mwmd &.afro¢ fa IN - d b.ir.w.lopesb iypmbimeafsm Waddmovelloadiakaawambgiedbeeeol, .V-otWgooIo9eIb-n!,dle®emngglilidabdl mbant-endeleesncatmthe Fveardnndelam BWIAhgOUTdd C«eplemv.L ' Ihodoo,nml mmnma ehnll 6e Empimettd Barb Tem' fmpoje W alae @Wag «buldtog penaiL 14 Whm avppmt « Idm.dag of cat ead named stop. l. d -.d d m be o --y by Ha glmning g0bght aro ail mgivrrr. the wa nop• dna admit dedgq bmbam, and The mode mad mala any be emitted f« buil tog « Boding pttdem m deal,, W ww int pajeeet pmid8tbatan moeloa eamdsymmenlnme al wgvoal af@eHdid'mq OIIldai.ba bees la>mtloL plme4 .wnelogam to the Building 06del pd. to ,-ont tion. The mginmmg gmbgla ed cog be pe jead ant-dened run n]. eogi«CeFuH bnpmtade,ad boo,abuctt,o[tla oum.dagmdcmdA'mlEe mabillyofdl . elopvvddjrrntdmmea q-emtpieLva Hendon e maa.eminemn.. L5. When m pea albmoglti ,ter pW,, the mgmedog gmbgWandl delmdm lithe bedrock 1. 1. Pdmmeacbaam>tim hnerndmeomol s)3,oebv716aiod1 nddrHdenele% m m, aejt dy 8ecmd or bund ton wW sedgy Leeman wear. U emvidnd ---Y by be mgtomiog�bmlmd ma�aa,eeompeemd M bh.WvambepMeal. 2 ARa nrb ednsmm, rte and deed, diva m 1116 4om .s,..s. be- oil dedN bed, and tin an IG ]beam« j.3.mbebe shell pergm pariadic io p.-4 a ed mmniee mmpbm sep-ldmap barrtn V=PW ft. Only clam were gam d1 beefed cou be peeped to the stem dmma (mea auaid etq heard•) . upon weepletimoohmgb Smiling. 3. Alla baeh temente. the pebumaee, of the Cowl nwool eysamsiati be 1.116 and mined cod 17. The -Ined n mpml and.pmnv.l from the mg mgt. ebxl! vutkme the typo of 6ddmUng to of d -tem. pmbunal �eWeiaglaldmindwitht7mmMd afobto®ngd a ht-pb-dmtly,wbedam danmddall beve WmrcoehlesL mbeamwd «d10d61d 4. Oedm dmaad w0ttr gq-1.1 ofd,Hmldg 0111.1 Is. Til mU negin rn,1 m86t®tg gmbg(R meU potion, mf dont begmetiw and be -1" S. lite aomcaemreball be tasp,dWead dill iia ntc=.y toemvtloa to pmrmpbao bap= amu Me plw, a:n.tbev and We oda damn ma.tom em tam- m veUy mmpfima Mb W dbamsdaarmdidom m.. wbera bapmmdwmam.mn witbmtluirp bev. 6..711-m end pombm«p,,Jm 1w,rnhn11 be rtep-7A.f«emiamlmw- of Um 19. The don agues eidi in avdnbl. damn mod S m KdfY moyHmoe 606 be Pim,. lamaftbnpcmitwimm WaP='dm daim. 1. tee - of Ikea. «,eBrml by d. maeneew, pe rldm or penjoet awry m popmly ,mbdda 6, device, the auHdhg OM.W aety ema em ugmq ,do- week be be dmf to apcd6maoa.code end any speW cccd Y•T'6.- chmair be end. ow«re da inclmm 20 Thepecaift i.-p�'6iliyt d....b.1- m iahWmohifpt,ocros plam.aead4eWdvAmk. 2L SnineyficiEd- nbeadmfml,tbvthe 7. 1.9. ave. the B.Hdmq OT.W mart mom meq 7meio- .it. be da«,he mmve ayk. 22. 11. Inadavadpatteed. rill Wi ides i,thotc M,Wiyoflhepmmite, the 6 7dma or X.C.apeneh In wddig. Th, peal. then am be tnawd =U ® modm,coot e7nm.Rvo.dby beDmlftOftial Inbtalled nod, Fee ofomimiftbemmimteogW.4lit, tbe mwcd psn,k paid by We owo¢ 771 E mwq 0@®i my waive imlndd, of an cmalm mol 23. App dpmmiv,otmrm. emlimpaaiy drJmgvpmieiomdmnbe mtmpmimtagoiaing cyst®adel6afmt Oaobai mdaflmAprU30. toopdied,daHBndmg. 24. Any milNin went well. "Ibe a6mdoosd m co.VU with tbeped6.%J-.pprnved by the CbyvfOtamond Be, ai. Aly edaigg mepaoh and .ePUn tab .hem ba .bead®d m emvpH= Mb d, Umf FbmbingCdeb�>(gmrrlof0e[3yH 1111;OgidaL 26. Pd« to fad apponoi, a1 eivll .&-.bell tetdfy m the liulid'mg Of leiel the rmmant of cath mood Gating ate mad mg ap.edva 27. An c00mme innn es mm owe in am= with the on -dm Bolls --bill be mmoactd win, lypo-S -.4 ail® &...d mmaxrasy by ookem. wybmvenmS eta, c,d,m! by He edi mHitem• U. Fpm ton tome btt=q red We ebddamp or to spmeW,d elm. Ittsuldid- 29.Slaw ppoviW creating IS l . in GM r11H be with en ppmmd�brigdme eyaem, unlete tel -i appmvdbybe11.1dmgOf ieid 30. lbo mmtbgmamtier Ball mhrmlamet®mt olmmpUovm m Ulairgryowd gmdbgpleo pdore, 31. Asphebgactimsn,ntebembnmvr: Pddngad1r=3"A/Cova6'AAH,dsioetrAIC-'a" (cam.) Ir lbdoadd) or do soil engine, ddb.bait, paeamt seam-trdmiom for eppwa) lnsd,"A'voluemydsafmnntbmalesoilf ml etpmhdoa&einAecs. 32. Pm1®o1y sii ad Swingy ed all =btapea epaae ee eoFavd by the City tee c000Wcmd A pmtetllm epptovcdmdmgplm 33. All editt daimgl cameo though tbh ole don ream I. oemnt o.mdidrm entil indEgen W 6mAo mem waamoappawd 6y RcHaibmg010dd; Imweva, in tory coq a1 pmaitim dun beheld I'vhiof«mYdemsBedm m o6sbvcdnganm7 dr3aRopatcm. 34: Ondeo¢opmdm.inddmgaaidomce degd7ametdlU not TAn moduudbnwmatll fel®of 6:00 P.hi and7c00A34 dmly«m Sdudm«Semdeye. 33. Aao[dt1'age gsem ddt be mselldmvmametmaddmlm mdm of etopec Raafdtdagt ofimR be tUeaipaad Imo ihegmudvn the mbjmt pmperywfimmapoaabk. 36 U. petmiltm "give nee ombb nodw m ft team of.dj.idnq )ads nod hiding. Pd- to . begiankt; a -W- Whkh may W1m thelmmd and .bj-mpoo flbo ed)ddegpmpmry. T31 teden shill tree de Wended depb of a.vati, ed whee tla -V-d- wet aooanwce. 77,e dJoidng owes don be dewed m bmf 30 drys and ra-bfe eccen on tie pe mined PmPedYtetvotecebuaumegif6etoddtm.avl®maswimpmtaad by hw. 37. Wrt9l) X Nor m Onelgv vdafbu stdioe th.-V.dNeeivlt-si-mat mdfi•eha me -&Z wa done in cmgd -ith meaFte-d pba 19ml ) DIG ALERT a.aaa�w m,rx.em,m:ammn au totem 1 ra ,.tear enecra : rmor moa e�eaae.ew a� oan � spa .� nuc 7a. r.= mry� nvmmnxsna > � s+v ,-Lw0-4"''+,33 aw"°'®aera rna,m o1OCPL1am oa nw ar oo n eu°oce"®aa ne ems• ,U„ ral m wmeaem. mnrr.trxr a virwTY MAP CONSTRUCTION PIAN 11) WL Ir GWI BASK HM 1210 OR FOWL Q 7611. 12' WCH Bl9N i/ATFM 105 178101 EOPL p 061E C M RMOER RIFT v/Aided, ME 00 OI MA ® 061E r til On m NDS sloe OR MYL ® 761L Y WIDE SRS WTE 800E HM NO A MYL © WL 4' Ol WM FFE Air 40 PC Q MIL r Ol aM FOE SOL 40 PO pe OM. R00I W -W PAD 0 MIL SU Fun, ® CD16E SLOPE MOM MAY 7 OF WFFM IF00U NOTES TO OWNER, CONTRACTOR & ARCHITECT GRADING LEGEND T.W. TOP OF WALL TF. TOP OF FOOTING F.S. FINISH SURFACE F.C. FINISH GROUND F.F. FINISH FLOOR T.G. TOP OF CRAZE EW. LAO( OF WALK T.C. TOP OF WRO T.B. TOP OF SEW G.F. GARAGE ROSS F1 ROW LINE INV. INVERT 700,p) E70SLNG ELEVATION fOp,z "'--o PROPOSED ELEVATION PA FLANIER AREA DaSiING WALL PROP. GARDEN WALL ® PROP. RETAINING WALL HP. HIGH POW EARTH QUANTITIES RAW CUT 700 CU. YDS. RAW FILL 2400 CU. YDS. 1. WGIRLM O MWCLOR AMES nW N AOMPTI ICE 001 GMaY ACCEP{EO Cc1161RIGiIDN HVCROA On6 =XFI OUTmN.19H IOL BE WIM) TO AS= ME RO WISWE FESdIRMIR FM dA SIE WN0M It TIE MIME OF OV471 "TRIM OF nE MM,, FUUMI' MFOY A ALL FIRM ANO PMPMYL HW DR MANS M SKL W WDE M APPLY COItMOJW AMI Rif A LOGO TO RM WOW NPA6, AM CWHI lO1 OONRYLM ROM AMW 10 ONTO. 7OaM AT NOD OESGN PROFUMK IMM FM W AM ALL =ff. IDL Ot AHHED, N WHICTON Wei TIE IMMICE E W V= ON FR)ECE 2 la OMM tAUS M AM HOFOSD GROES SONO UE FELO VUM PROM 10 06TWOL ' I W MIIY SBMI N1S CONiLCEO. A WYM SMI BY TE CNIXTIR 9000 ItO7R08.7E0 AND ff SWL 0E THE CXMCWS R MIMIN M TME DBE PI113100 SM MOM TO PR= TIE MW OF SIAUOIRS Pa90 ON DE SITE AMI M NMY nE QMM OF nE mm 06EMTRY IFOI i1RR 011400'. L UMifM AND OUR OM6fWM Bee OLLWRUS AM MUM FDA AWa MOM OF TIM PLM A'0 ARE MI 1l. BE USM FOR CO4TWM CW MOM FOR 08000 HW'OSLS. VIDIXTOR(S) Tit IO' ORI MMM FOR ®ONO PUAPM L A SAS WAESRCHON IT BE MM Uf A AT nUU0E0 S DOWNOSST NO/CR MI. SMS AMI FAWN Al%a'fA9Nft' SE NN MW MMM OR TIE MWMM OT O' IXMI WREN FOR TIM HAA. AHDE CO79AnW15. 10. 00F5 IM TIM OR 011M SAS COOAIb RACK 70, OA910 OR MER WOWFNN W INS NO REWI IIRY FOR S= (OMIO SIREFiRM L F DNS FROW 6 SHOD B,' SMhY'am on 7" am am ,OFR ITE mw SOEM" OF TIE Mmm ai liui , TIE MW DOW WR NO LUM BE TIE DINNER C8 ROM M0 ML TWE N3 FEMMIB! AS 10TIE RPL CO6IREUH PMW. TIE 97m HWaE2R Wu 10! EE FEMME FOR FIRERS OR t IMM 7T W OAO WE Min COMM MC iii 06ROCU OF TIM PMECT F TIE SWOO 10 Will DOE BY SIM OM Min IS OFM SIMM OIL 7. AS EAM04 0401 VS NOT O VMM) FOR TIM FMW. 114MM BW EXISIX OR 1745 SHE UM TIM TIM SNORT ON TRS PUN (F ANA AAE SOWN), 71E, E .....vARMM 6 MM16FIE RA JAYM A NILE OTUPW R7NF11 DMARM A M RE018IC WL DMIM IN, TF SiRIOI@4. Hg20E4, 9)WR406 E1C 1RE l.1 A ALRF PER SRL7WAI. O OL A'010f Bt MINIM SOWI IW TIG RAlL OLaSI OF RETA AYES 6 m UHME IOf Uf ALPOE COmAAN15, BC 9. ALL SW RE OWWLE. 7RUN0 $NET. MU OR DWe a PRS WILL NEED M BE IWN M NR TIE mE OF THE MEM. 0 6 W TO ME UOER OF NE FROM 70 PHdCOCRLY 111SPON AND WWMI nE WN9 TO AMM DW NO GIMCE OWJK M SOUK BE TIFFS M AS m my m'OMm now 11"m SDL SIOm m APN I 1 t {! 11 11 11 1\ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ 1, I 1 I I 1 I \ `\ '\ It \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ �\ `\ It V \ �\ \ 1 1 \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 \ 1 \ \ \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ l 1 l - I 1 fl j t 1 1 \ \ l , t \ i1• \ 1 1 t 1 'I. I 1 O t t \ \ \. t \ \ 1 C \ \ t \ \ \, \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1125.716 \ 1 l 1 1 1 F \ 1 l I 1 t i t '\ '1 `\ '1 t\ \ \\ `\ \\ `t \\ \\ `, \t \\ \\ \\ `\ `\ 126.9�')'\\�, ('N$9'h6'1t6' E _\\ 1 _ \` t 1/ F\ •F 1053.8I\ '\ \\ `\ 'l \\ 1` \I `I '1 `{ \\ `\ '1 `\ `, `t ' ` \\ `\ \\ `\ t\ \\ ` `\ 1 7\ \ \ \ \ . `. \ \ 1t l 1 1116.48 lence \ `\ ` '\\I �\ \ ` ` \ \ \ \ \ \ rtg \ \ \ \ \ 1 t \ \ l 1 t\ ' \ \ \ v \ \ �� \ \ y \ \ \ 1\ \\ \\ `\ \\ \ \ \ `\ `� `\ \ \\ 117 .t• `\ `\ \ `\ \\ \\ \\ \ `\ `\ `• `\I r9 + 1 ng\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ` \ \ \ \ \ \ `'1 It •\ C V06 96, � i t O.XA.75\ • \ 1 \ . \ \ \ Y \ � '1 `1 I 1 II f 1 I � 1 1 � j 11 tt 11 �ti t' '1 `\ _\t )\ ..• \ • `\ \\ '\ '\ • 1 t 0( � t � \ t,. +°�. � \ `\, _ l ..'£ \ `\ �i, 11 11 \` \ .. \ t+ i i 11 , I 1 1 I I I I I 1 I 1 1 I I I + \ \ \ t t1 ` '1, `1 `\ Y\ `\• `\ 1} 1 1 I i i i I� i i t i i i i t+ i i i i+ I I I 7 I 1. 1 1 1 \ ' �\ i i i ,j i '+ `, `t \ \ •c :,'^vN.•I^tw. �\ . II �+I _ t 1' O\ , \t \ \ \ ,� . '1 '1 \\ _+ O •\\ { O` `t `\- I 1 l I I I 1 1 I ! + I I t ! 1 I I' I I 1• .1 I I 1 , \. , 1 I 1 f ' 1 t A 't 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 7 f I + I' I t \ 1 V _5•, . ,1 1 lI I t l I. I t I t 1 1 I I 7 I I I I � 1 i I 7 1 1 1 \ 1 1 0 " 1 \ 1Q ' 0VA \ • _ 1 1 1 I 1) 1! ; I i t • i � I ; f 1 1 i 1 1 1 i � I ' i� X101 1 11 ,1 1 1 09'p do At `t1 '1 gg1 1 I l I+ 1 1 l I 1 1! 1 1 7,¢511481 1. I + 1 t 1 7 1 I 1 I. 1 1 I I , 1 1 `092.17 /- ea / ! , / / t \ •1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .1 1 1 1+ 1 7, 1 1 1 1 1 ., I I I 1 I I 1 1 I' ( I� I,,, I l' I— —1--,— r 1_I— 1 �. \ I l l i I{ I t l l l l l l l l! , 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I I l / l 1 !/3'01.41") 1 1lD991401 l�N89;56'1�!'E 1 1 1. I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I { 1 I I I , f l , 7 1: I l 1 1 I I I l I I 1, ' �� beg. fdncLlt , 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 I t I 1 t I/' t i-• 1 1 f 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1! 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 I f /� 1 I ( l l / , / i /• .,,� r1]17 1 I t 1 i rvice i t l, 1 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1106. �� I .• / { 1 1 I ( I r 1 N i 10R•i'g4 j UPPER TIM WILL 1 7 1 1 •✓, I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 j j 1 toI. I 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 I / f l ,) ,. tow FIRMEAMUn sal 1IOv0:21 ( 10• IGIL 1 fence VIS xN:IV AANI DLDX fMMORE Flllpl".0 GME -.. _ .. 5 EC I Ivr• \t \ V `1 1 t I I 1 + I 1 "••. -, rt 4'b (UN.) PERF. D301 PIPE 7T E UL ER EQUAL IRLAPPED Ni1H Fl!ir71 FAPRC III rJ IN 3/4' GTI91'.D ROa(t m. rAm Roax.IL1w 'A1M !N(6 'V . EP AT 1S (4Rt). Nm RDA: 6• SRU MAL QU7Lrt PW6 (R JU VAk S ME O LOW :Y:3:'U PAD <' P0.Yt5 AIGYD REE WALL (flEFu-1 iD '�tE CRAatIC PLLH;. TYPICAL SECTION — ALLAN BLOCK WALLS 02 TO k6 yJ 1 I 1 1 1`1 1 1 1 1 1 t t l \ 1 tl 1 t 11 1 11 t 'I V\ 11163.22 \ \ . �g I Ory, ^�h 1168-,- 73.98— 174,46— .94 1173,74 11 '-1bld—i-bLd6 _—__— .l,�l �s 1 on.blil\g, \\ bldg`In, c�tdq__ r_ _o8L-•"On. one. be?Ilene OWNER: ADDRtSS ADDRESS PHONE N ` 11.44,29 II m0 tree ^•_-1144.46 w.m 4,140.52 '�� Pan_ tree 114�.29� ee P tr h� I I 114;93 I I I 114 .30 5 I 114J.03 CONSTRUCTION PLAN pm 1r ww am Im nmOR mw. p — tr Ww 0®19/RNIGd 16t t�Jl w Wltl, CD tml.rwwlcW alx v/ctmmwmut p �mL raA oa owi lm o7®wmtu p o4R. r'OE BWO aws owx Im 1a w ouK p emLrwowl ac Bw.w Nc • p /eW. f W aYM RQ IDL b iYC p mot qot Kvw Bn p Ion. utoac Kae aw a 1P9DIf 1PLL Imm m g Iv A•cvmm0: mwwo® mrmwr mno wr wwwaacr NORM SCALE: 1'=10' TRACT 30092, LOT 14 2651 BRAIDED MANE DP, DIAMOND BAR•CA 91765 OR GRADING PLAN aR .ALPINE ENGINEERfNG.ING. 9N1 a3aWMCULTOR PRN'f, 11YNGUtUlIR15,G9ffi57 2 0r' -Lug .�\♦ .•� •\ nl\'♦. �` ' �,��♦.. —_ --.... �m ` ` \' `'tom ��' •' 1 !` - - � ^- w.- `• ^\ - -�„` � �^ \� _• _....-- �' bJ- �\5 ".tel ~`rr`a m � wfr� . ,.•1 .. \ ♦ � `�vvowoeceQ `^.,. ^ � ^`� �^_.,_ w. z ^ ���♦ -..___ �'� T+' \ .r7• � �%`„ :'� i \ �"m..."tk Ant ♦ ^ `�- `"^•'~ ``♦_ \�• m� ♦♦ .-.- ,�� � �� p♦♦ � `ry.•. I -- - - .� �, In -; !'T,; .nm I � \ \w.�.�.r'....... \ _ -'L6 •`. \ ^'... .• ^ \ ��\' ;•,�..- � ♦'. __ ,.. s":' -j � li+ til y.ti_ I ---- ---�"` `0�'y„• - IJV♦♦ i 1 - _i r� _ rd. `\. \•.. \_. q i a/� p♦ p� 1 .. 1 t 1, •�1tra OJ�.i♦ eti n, Ln m it w �il . v\ � `� i y � � ...� � � - 1 .. �..�'.r - -I I LL's:'= I \•...vwN� A.m I j� \� . V _ , � _ -1 _ utvuvlm � �r A ��_" I � t�l ' J I- '�1 �•', . � � � \\ 1` \ >r o ;i "�1.irvnl' _.j ,i'.� _>� I-•- csimvAr� .. I.. u -i" 1-- i 'j J,�\ ^ ,\ C. S;'�:.i � Hl { Sl—I w ly I • �QQIO �� �rl �1 w 294 �i%' I¢ ' � �' '`. \ \ smwcn —_ -.. ` • r r '-�y \`Oa' � \ \\ o '� ttaM�` i � � � `, Jul/}r � *W�cpjo .. •.. ...... . \\ `r mom'• _—_----_--- "'._ ��y c°9,` ,�o" '' v 'll ro ra Z. J. C,\ \ ZZ, 'N. w XZ HADDSCAPENOTES M�fumim om<.<nArwm..w,.�irnerro.m<rmbi3..m Ambs<m*.0®nwm.wmm.r< AS mfm{M<WaM<mr.Wdteba<uWnmrrS•<mr<tlmmTm uu.Pemnbbrmtb elwwr. mR w a r �uaew.lmmm. bm wu mm<m n0m1 s*<w mbi rmm.+mi m mA A -x bv.mnmsmvrmm.wRwamaa.l.<r.Y<..:mmmara•nw.r.a•b.s r.tiim�mm m®wmwww mwnm m.m.mm nem. A+ cm.6dwMm�mnms=saawwer.smamma.�m�msm.m�e.emm.eu:m«rn .HmMmmmdamWNrtm�f<wOrawm Msv. MS WutnruvmE04annw,Sd•vw,wnbtmvwGvebmamAimvYmaewnam MwwvR W<bwv/mbpaeatbpwrdawmlmbnCmwa.bfi0p.v�u6bR 8 PadMpmlUuvMlm•�vm<mlhun<bnarAdbwNaWam<mua A-> OYxNbmmnmum Mmmu'mbN.AO[SrvmmaAuvlb•bOomEEmbrtlbbmc.wW mmm v.e � s.,m<ab. bna<w. rambmR n a Robnm 0ab.0 r way mm+tla us vvh<v'TUWm RhbrbmlvLV^bd Um ndbvummhmavemmpmbrmW mumm �mC�m NCmafuditvm¢kaamnLSwbwmtlw<mvmOmabummmRRlmbR. Mb TmaUmmuYbWmgbm<bupv0lmpc 'rmunr Wdma•n.wW^MmdmmYu mmmmwawm..bn<.Im mbmnwn<amtlwws.w.4E.amb•ama IS�d<•mmuuwYArNmmtlRiuuU.Twmm�rnmNbul3fLPmeiw WmWIYuI<ma, Ywwi umAm as.b..b mmwm..mw� A0 o.mmR.N.DOeemawamwmm,n.baa.mwmm<o®nammmbmbmm.swe. w.am aa<oam�n�.oSYw<D,eUmuMwm®Ywmmrem.mw... wYm Rm<b rwd.bmalmvrbc U>�Rw°^�^'CmmlYn pbFmmrAmmMbmYaa[umvmrmbmbNdmv�b Mr y�i W�iwl�j Aao w �n �bwmm.nmbmamm.,,ab..aa.w�mmwemwn3wmema ms.mz mma m memA mm<wwa..�.:. sY,YbO m ow n�a. kll lm.m0.mwmmvms. brtmwvdmmrvNwiwW mmmmwmmW m.wMlww rwma Ir.awrsa<�.mb<mYormms.maam. Mii PmIMlnibrlutlmhwASCNn hwnwmba(ImmMm.mtluNmbmNrim<vtm �mCmm<m®mAm. Mi] Ta•NSewMbavdty<mEUMIurW.apo0.ARrmlNnaw.bma�pedrarbnma ewvnWiLLWdmae•Nawmmumbw5.mmmemmmtCYy o4eammnwm Ivmaummb.3owmmnYuu6•bmaiblAavm.. wNmbwmrywl<Eubluw Car wvP W uwfnwAtrebNUOeE nrOry. bvuehrMe fburmwm mOaMmbuu@r a Gmoetl W pavlvNmlu, A•11 vmvlb�vsn�ir<+<�mm�eml�mawmbwswmnw�sAmn� bm..msYn<rytls. [mmb<91xE1wvnuboq,mlmbrOWpmm<Ndv btlw.Snmbl N¢dlH•up,fW ' pnmrtuernRvwwYR WIFu65p.mJpmlmbmMCmtlmlvaw<5®vdkwVmnvd rlmv-rvd d,nRmuut uSd•utlbwlmm Si• dwpubdNr.kr. wls msbmmmmamsdYnmsam0mmumbmw. wla<•www�wmbaRmbaam.rw,Mmbwroummesrmb. kD m.0wwmmeasMmw.mmm.aw.m�nObY.nwsm.c.rvPw AnR � W.mo�eabvnrmNpmue. r<a.odama.m<..xuwmawmm.mora.s.. r Tmm�rrw<wra<,.�m�rm�mmmmrwmmmtlmmmm�mwm.bemrmo3. ASO Cmcmmypm-<wgmartm.GmmmaieavrtN,<vbM.kkui�lu[.MvMO• fawn NRm Mai �Yrd� bbmmmaYabwvwpmw4mWubpMmhlSvwrybwpmpuv A wuvrmm.m.sYmrtesmmi,rm0werem.ab.Yami irma�m<,.m ir.m � �� �mbnmmuRW<W m0Ym1N� mbvammnmSvmaY.aw�Y.w vr4 Ca W+5 A.SS PWvmmW bdq bhvuaMm AEamambtivimwHmmimmw.9eeW' ' mm,vmkau�ummbmvmmmmPmnaeudW. A I deum.veRbmmal WwMiOuvM�mm4 bvmvaNmsmYiwmva WeYMeu amb{aRam<1wLL WAambD•MaMbbek.W mlm,bbuvumbm mbblwvaApvry wv mvelvlN'wuwvaR4 mOrmMbm bbavµwwmanb,pmiib. fpvnm®ayamwR . w•xt Eau<umabh®rytlM<9MWmnrwc'ua bpwmiNt4amm Mymn tlprmmlruv<v1.RmUMvW vqummmhmm NnfmwtlmvmbbC W mavmma .�M Wpa�,mm.� mvp.lmRrpmbmnm+v.Mmm<mmamlmgMlmmt, tlb era< apmapWfmbMbkRrbubvry.4mumvrmivuAmmeuRUMa mnWdvaNnrm�oR4RmeuY k>e x�sl�nwuYr�w..mr.mmmemaw..rrmwwmww.ma<r.m0enbass.c.m b,m..m,n m a mm s« army m 0w mni A.n sm.mama.m.N.mmmmcroswmammi,aw.+mmmmm®fuxnm,.w lmaahme Dnp WMblwCrywAiNrmRbmM uuYumbam imvbv<mm�mmimH mrb�4oAlmoM��4•r Waw oms0'�wsm x.sm<wmMm.mmewmma. A. rvNsb.u.ynmummnm<vmnow.nmozwdmwnwnn.aner<mwnm bvbbOm WdmannH•wY1<SS•Cbta PlkRmmmNedlvmgPWmrymry iVA• w.amz<mmnmaa� mmwnnbm:b.enaimmmnmmime<mm<wbbm.m �'�m�`�m.a� �Y�.mmbmwmm�<.wwA.•wnmmm A•xs rammrm,.m�smanwmYeeAasmvvwb.emb.waar.rtY.mw.sbwma oYbd b f+m. mmm•nmwma..a maea,u wb mmbm aAAspwv er W d mbm ma w4 mds Maepdwmmmn..sbb.U<.b m bw.m®.anmivww. AS MM11rmmJbeb WWb/Wr-WdmbA 11•m�vavb�btli.rWm�w0.vN�rnmnMWmm mOY.wvma�aromwmmm.< /.SI irvbewmu<bm<e.dm..<r<bwbnnwiMmanbuoio+mmn..na,h�nmm a wm.a,mwu,.bmmwmmdwemwA®bmm1. A . • _aYlumbasm®wms<mOMf•w.mwimmw<rm.mmr.iw A.a. �ermYCvbnrymvcbOA[rCmvbauwbplw CblmmoMmmnd<mw.au a<,.m.maem.me.,brup<m�Ydnrwmamm.mwammn.immbm, w �Imdw.w a�sra•norrmuwmumwmsb<e.d.a�m,e<mmmm.w.w --�J$0�•.•. /7J T+� � �' �� tri-C'� GENERALNOTES �- ��"\.�\•_•, �,` L 4' rm�P<fm�v>DYv�RMerb �TMVMm, a�2o, .bm+ ��m v�Y,�tlmimT.mfineavmSmwNum re°''L7 - �'�., z M.«scncsmmemr<md.e<mrsamTesmam.ama,,,amwaT.=<merrYnwnn=m.mm<�. Q O J --- TmmavddvmY<mrdbaam. 1b@d.lsYmwmianmmlmlam.mro¢wmevwCyloamwumuebfm<umSVTmry / G ��_.-' DWQylebmtmpovY,wGWlUeutlm.awvwmvm0eiblannibeUW mma.lbb'eeEvellmmmr.�r m<e�mi>.a�w.�w�"Mw �uea ' -L- —_ 'bQryt '-'-- _"' -^„_\. \, bm+or0n�ond� bm�w amP.im w�mvausvmrPmmLamCma®m3alwbmrnelswmmlGa.ndtm x ♦ / p+• 1l`• ' O. _ t Camcbngmrdf<rwm0+6iMNYwMca1«m+a{Wnlmmx3<c<Pgo7 i smmuarhr<pmSMmrmNgl011 ryIHAbdMmvbmE!mdAmvoh mmuud<puvd.G•v,mro 3;• 0 0� \, y �' '♦ ON . _ 16 � 4.'., m,owww.om.Ru�ao> s carmine.mrammmPmwlwnmmrzslr:m,.rbnfrmw,rrA=+kaMmsem•+m,<maa �j` \'1 r .. 0�.:mv batlmalbrlmRwgvmmvX.t �0.. �G O�' _� 7. rrommsmr�nmrew�mYtwmeb�m,:mcadom.Iwbae.nawwsG i / Y.y ov coomu vPW.bvcsu�v vtu�w uWim �mabmna wTM A Nm mbc mrtl FO t .. .. 'f7 -1L' L6MIyx.• 9 f4y.1 WIW L'JrM Y W 1 ;'Fx 14r Wa��.Y=FtGIL'AT E.M+mX•sLPE ouawlMt'.c. .- . =LaTlInu ME), 01!?G7?iY''kWTTT•14*01a2-pcm FAOw?' ^+ ;E 4: uT7 VF OP+�R. H-4 15 DCLGiEY) NtETC11iZTJ�K.pYsa'v AFymYG7' =TD11Y �,�0'ts7Dt21:W'2z+ s.L.. Ter�De�i�� uNOfGRH A0.CNITlCI11R! Tony Ooelpn, Inm 612001 Rio W.Y. FWloMn, CA 82835 Phono: 714263A22D Wit 714.726.1102 wYm Mtw,tywfn IIV nQ1-yd I0nin0... CA Stam U... A 4357 HARDSCAPE PLAN oU RESIDENCE 2651 BTWdbd m.. DfW. DISlnbnd Bory CA91765 SHEET I LI OP L$ SHEETS NOTE MARAD%TO MEET ALL USPS CODES MAILBOX/MONUMENT n AND PRIVACY WALL @ STREET u2" = r-0' 1. DESIGN WITHIN REACH'NEUTRA' HOUSE NUMBERS IN ALUMINUM, UPUGHTFROMGROUND. 2. 'SIGNATURE HARDWARE` RECTANGULAR LOCKING RECESSED BRUSHED S.S. MAILBOX. 3.4- CAP, SMOOTH STUCCO. 4. STONEVENEERTO MATCHHOUSE S. 42• HIGH X2'-0• WIDEX W DEEP PILASTER, SMOOTH STUCCO TOMATCH HOUSE 6, REINFORCED CONCRETEBLOCK MOHUMENi, IS' DEEP,SMOOTH STUCCOTOMATCH NOIRE 4 POOL &SPA "B -Bl " SECTION I ACKSIDEOFI INFINITY N 2 OF RECHARGER SIN AND AND TOP N T RECHARGE BASIN AND b• RETURN ON WAIL TOBE OR FORD EL INTILAL EESOIJD COLOR 3. 6`AVERTINE COPING. S. 4, WATERLINECOPING. 5. WATERLINE b. PERIMETER PTHOFRECHARGE LOWSPA 7. By STRUCTURAL TRUCTUR LENGINASIL TO DE DETERMINE BYSR INTERIOR PLASTER ENGINEm & INTERIOR PLASTER TO RE HYORAZ20. S POOL & INFINITY EDGE "A -A'" SECTION mrvPvcravTo 1. 2-TRAVERTTNECOPING,SQUAREEASEDEDGES SW BARDL BECUE 2 LYNX 11/2'CANOLEV L Z WATERLINE 3, b'WATERLINETILE,OCEANMETLUEEYES.- 4. TIED BOND BEAM, PERIMETER OVERFLOW. \ DROP I•FROM OVERFLOW TO INTERIOR CONERACFOR.CRUSHEFILL BILA WITH DECORATIVE CRUSHED GIASS. OF BONDDEAM. P-0 E POOL INTERIOR: HYDRAZZO FINISH. 4 POOL &SPA "B -Bl " SECTION I ACKSIDEOFI INFINITY N 2 OF RECHARGER SIN AND AND TOP N T RECHARGE BASIN AND b• RETURN ON WAIL TOBE OR FORD EL INTILAL EESOIJD COLOR 3. 6`AVERTINE COPING. S. 4, WATERLINECOPING. 5. WATERLINE b. PERIMETER PTHOFRECHARGE LOWSPA 7. By STRUCTURAL TRUCTUR LENGINASIL TO DE DETERMINE BYSR INTERIOR PLASTER ENGINEm & INTERIOR PLASTER TO RE HYORAZ20. S POOL & INFINITY EDGE "A -A'" SECTION 2 FII PIT ELEVATION 3 BARBECUE COUNTER -FRONT ELEVATION v2" _ E 6 FRONT PEDESTRIAN ENTRY GATE F =r-0" 7 WOOD AND STEEL BENCH FRONT ELEVATION B WOOD AND STEEL BENCH.PLAN v2n = ),-o„ TQrryDeSiq� 1. EXTERIOR FINISH - SMOOTH STUCCO, INTEGRAL COLOR, SW BARDL BECUE 2 LYNX TO MATCH HOUSE CONTINUESTUCCO OFIACDECUE ASH - 3. STUCC08INISH IN TOP 6- OF INTERIOR OF HREPIT. EDGEOF BLOCK (INTERIOR). -•. I 3. LINEARCTOR. NER HEIGHTTO TRO HI' \ I 2 I CONERACFOR.CRUSHEFILL BILA WITH DECORATIVE CRUSHED GIASS. COA:714.72Ei192 VCANTI.Z. 5.ENTIRE IPLIGH RID B. DUPLEXRECEPTACLE,GFI AL ENTIREPERIMETEROfREVE:.L EROIF 3RE NOTE SEE LYNX WEDS RE FOREXACT n. STORMWATER DRAIN. CUTOUT DIMENSIONS. 2 2 FII PIT ELEVATION 3 BARBECUE COUNTER -FRONT ELEVATION v2" _ E 6 FRONT PEDESTRIAN ENTRY GATE F =r-0" 7 WOOD AND STEEL BENCH FRONT ELEVATION B WOOD AND STEEL BENCH.PLAN v2n = ),-o„ TQrryDeSiq� i. LYNX SW BARDL BECUE 2 LYNX UNJSCAPE ARCRIFFCNRG OFIACDECUE ASH - 3. STUCC08INISH OM SMOOTHTECO TOMATGH HOUSE 4 QUARTHONED ITEGDU TOP, rrH HONEDFNTLEWITH 3'SQUARE FAGE Way. 6120.11R.Wm B120ei t i2• CANTIE AN S IUCCOFAAL ATBOTTE FVlidon, CA 9235 CA M22 PCan:.714 2511928 6. 11/2' REVEALATBOTTOM,SNCCO, I COA:714.72Ei192 WITH LED STRIP LIGHT. 7.LYNXOOUSLEACCESS ODORS —aneanlony.wm B. DUPLEXRECEPTACLE,GFI a CA CADmmRydWIBNrG m U—r43e7 NOTE SEE LYNX WEDS RE FOREXACT CUTOUT DIMENSIONS. 7 W GPI`" 2. WALLLRSHT DETAIL 3. 2'XS'BG TAIN ELTUBESTEEL ECH NISM'TODE MECHANISM 4- EOCKUPPORT,CONN,TOBEDETIL-41 E SIDESUPPORTS,CONNECTED TO PILASIEIIS SHEET S STATUE VENEER 1. BRUSHED STAINLESS TUBE STEEL FRAME WITH LEGS AND CROSS PIECES, WELDED TOGETHER. 2. STUCCO FIN,ATTACHMENTPOINT 61 3. POOL SMOLASSFENCE 4. 2X6 REDWOOD LAID RAT, W ITH t/2• GAPS BETWEEN BOARDS,STAINED TO MATCH HOUSE WOODVENCEJL S. 21/2" FRAME, BRUSHED SS 6. 3X3 LEGS, BRUSHED STAINLESS TUBE STEEL 7. POOLSAFEGLASSFENCEATTACHEDON TOPOF STUCCG In B STUCCO FN, ATTACHMENT POINT 92 OU RESIDENCE 26SI 01vldedMin eDdve Dimond Bu CA 91765 1. 3X3 LEG 2. STAINLESS TUBE STEEL FRAME WITH EVENLY SPACED CROSS PIECES ICONNECTTOFN WITH EMBEDDED SSOR GALVANIZED HARDWARE ' 4. STANED2X6 REDWOOD LAID FLATWITH IP- GAP BETWEEN EACH BOARD. S. CONNECTTO STUCCO HN WITH EMBEDDED SS.OR GALVANIZED HARDWARE ROmncoG+, ATcvar aaAFRDGY:PWROC:.WTJ onr �s GGt= PMStatK SHEET L2 Or L5 SHEETE I rd / I 1 I 1 I I PLANTLLST 51ela1aa:riam S Isp. sh..sar.,mn IxP:v.e1� Imm D�rmmt�• ,•LrSrv.N?Imrlmvr BhNdm:er r rr� l a• • .rh 0 Omrr � Jn TeMaMry a Tap It C+Laiw im Hm —wmnah waJl tmuv�r�n ROva •] d wM+a.a n id is Sa inAwe•Astwxwr ta.A.��-c,r j tuwi a apm ie hb.ardC.Smt. Msa�iwn �rwbra w krc..• inb fry 'ro Apvxr Cm.eanm � pn•upmwrar 5• Sp ma PxDr Ommb,pmJm a a5aa,u,= nwrvmrm'NV=Unm' Tamlm,swo• a6 Sa a Iw P,Va un ��NvpSM lu:x Oawn. .emaa'>mwa' n5p a S sen Ymm lkamravrrv+wa'Brl.apnf sa 7 rnpam5;a LFh MntreiWx,e:,!(i+va ld Spl sd InaW v Bawnmy ra swwnm Turn pa.• l rsp ro. �� ,W:rysm=ubn (Pe.ee•tuebi Ip xpa. irm+.vla0:ra t wa.veew v.xnxa•aamemrwNr' a wn p:pr nlm, e„mr NUJ: aranmeralarP,e,mwxr Mnrw a, x= I i �tr^'a� rummvT.naala.u• .mnra an +,Tar opma„ oPxrewmonma Mn.a, aaa- J a= waal.av>w r,�1 .nm,e, wa=- a.m=r. au.aanvm. senm=x1nPa.e. romltm .a. lra= as _ wra.na..sm wnavlha,.sm.rl+.am„�a= mn,w �ewhvnwwax•il;m,iaer :P:sw,•e,:.ma ad lw lmwo+a tw aa, A: t.nsma de.na—,2 s.r wnu sx.., l., wam.e w+n l.Gx.nvav-e• a, yx ttr "wai�.+mnw.'�w`�m>aw:nw:+ror:.x.Me y oa,r rm.>m. amt. hm�.uma uvmy,n M arm w w.n was lawv la u+ep Jar, Kar am b rmm:sN, a mN6 fanrtaiw m w a pamvmm r= mmmn a av:pa,an,nn aba, ra+utaa 114 mK bJLOawelmwmeamVary+r.NrwrAsnvmp0••tr•v�wmtton,.am o�i� Yaamtnrmrm,==maJmp,.a:mnmm.5m+r ,mt r pe:hrt.,mavlµnrm,w=ar+•mu.tamwNmsMWrmml+mam SMapluv,oame,vr Jo.nmlrnm^1J ursw�I��mJmverrlmlrav+aNn,nmm�eear,mn,umre.f. Pm'^G+I:anrS.sJer,fnG ubm:aapmea+�mmwronvrvrnna,mmy,amM1 xiYm,:rrfibrem,mn,IMrtaasmnraaelnapiYatmdJeep.a,elpry Gnumwwvdantam=la r,hmuW Pnnnbmm+CaMumwap hvMerfar6vatltmw W:eanaavmaWrmub wJm+:rmm,b.n::.mm,m„ar>..:.m..=Im,b<�.Ipawaux m,rRm.as,o:ma,m::.wn-+ba,l.,,xxnhn.ar,nm.a amm.. ����wvu.y,barxnmm:.arwme.rmwn,ermrx,.rsamnr.,m+.*rm'mmJ,mm rmrsa marmr.ar.�rmr®m5. soa�"".,,m'+-:'x aaa:nar, o-.,r.rta, Ix rm m m m„=I.,a a r a� m::. Ac- tm s<• a J.. r,:n lm m n:,.mn.a S,..as. nm„apron,m,xnwm<„ma.abnaarwm.alHna.mmaew:w+>+Nraer,rmex..uawrm„w:a�mbmaJam,ur.mno.,M.mrra.,�m.a cpm�enn�ra»rv"��r e�,:daa m�aawpibmmaalM'mon.�w+m',rn�,aJ�a�aaam'�mnrsrs�wrc�'rala,e.eaaaJuem.mr>,nmaibnauwm mpramtaamu.n.mavJJanmbry a,ona+„vwblamaraumrao.rn ry SIIRUO AND PERENNIAL PLANTING NOTCS: t. Eavavtt stied g dllealy ,.,dceaswllythroot manna )5'Insin aeplhtlu[lhe soilln rhe cvnminer. Ensure Um[soil a[bvrtom ,fit\ of hole is salW and:rightly mounded. d.ih edges of hole ` "_ Fn hole wrdt wamraM enturc that it drams wllhin ane hmn.lt hale tivn nv,tlmin. augcrheles tV break through mrdpan. Fill hole l.2 \ mtlmcs llml111dry.if hole dvunordnin, nvuly Wnd,mpv Amhlua 7 3. Drc Iiytiima[bvll bytlunking into water lormytd- 1, ldrtneh)priarmplan ,,hole. tvr rvnminersuea len trop l5 gat Add mycorrhual IunCl tlhenly ro plant roou per product lama II IIs I- product i, not used i 5 S. Se[plvrz roa[bull in hole rams" on mmpae[cd soil so plm,[rnnu if l^hli;nertivn hMdrN Cmdc. Us'vlµ lD,=wnpost, 90X nallve wll, bukl:ll,vn Mtn hale up ro V3 Ph at molbalL molnenmp and romping all around. ' 1 d. rill r<ma:nmC Donlon sunaundmg the rap of the root ball 11th mom mckf:Il 11,EI—t, torr Plan[ collar IS sag l'hiCh—Ili, idi, Provide podtivc dmmvgc —1lrom rommll 5 7. APPIY 34^thretldcd mrk mhlMlorCania weed and Nicaro llec)tvpdrcssrn6aroundenllmmotball arca, stoYnC3•ax�Y tram <ollunf plant. 8. Auer pHnting, waurlhoroughly. aliawing mul�hm imtic and water to fvak m.Repeat rhamughwa it. PLANT HOLE DIAMETERS I GAU )'I- SGAI_^_'4' SHRUB & PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE -I _T — TRCC PLANTING NDTES: 1, E—I, planting hole at lmat cwlce—Odea,roue baliana K'IcuInaepN tmtlhe it in thcmnminer.Inh— That soli at bnnom If holt, 111o11dana allghdy mmrnJed. Scanty edg<lat hplt, _. Hu nm=won wamrana m,hrc ma[n acorns wbnm PnenPnr.uhple dpm natarnn,ahs<nrmn roamae mmngn mmpan. P:n nm<la mere nm=,urania n d,itnole non no[dmin, n=ply untluap=eantnemr. I. 3.. Drmch MaIt It bon by dhnkmCrhry w:rurm mYra ml d,—hit ligvld Vrvdti.it u:cd)pdhrm pl:mhngm hole. _ Add mYmrtAlul IhnCf dl—dV to plant mau p<, product label F a. Set punt root bag In hole no pLvn colluls l"Illgher lM1an lWahctl gnda Dsing lD: mmpost,90a nallve snlimckfllutainm hvlehply J3ha,htvf roptbali, mPln=nlnS and mmpinC all around. _. till rcnmimnC Purdmr surmu:xling Ule leV of Un•rovs ma with nmre mcklil)mu.Lmurc UrV[pian[cvilxnsnil l'hil'pwr Bran µmac provide Puddve ._' ammage awnnrom rootmn. 1. APPIY 3-I"1hr Ndat ba,k mulchlargaNe weed and NSmu/reel lvpdre55ing around eneim molmll arn.lmYing 3^arwYlrom milar of plant. a. Aherplanhrrg, water nmroagmvannwrngmwrnros=rim and warm la rP=k.n. R=peat mPmngn watMng. 2 TREE PLANTING & STAKE DETAIL NOTTOSCALE ie"Desipn Tatty Daagn, Ina 812 Del Rb Way. Fide—, CA lit=i Ptane: 711.25 3=11 CIII: 7/1.720.11M wmv.ellvantel unwlINI. dmiSnh, mc.mm C0. Slele tkense M 4n87 SHEET U or LS SHEETS dleo CA SW.tk... 0 a]87 511EU L4 DE LS sticus LJCN NG LECMD -LD ­Dt" as a DoW_ IF— —TDO LID­ dleo CA SW.tk... 0 a]87 511EU L4 DE LS sticus N vIt.-GEN. NrulTr NOTES le"De�ivn T."y D..Ip.l.. 6120.1 FuO W.Y. P..: 71 C.M " zealez 2m, ca smd U......6�7 M= L5 or LS stlEcTs IRRIGATION LEGEND trig HII N,r PCP-ULTRA-ADJ-B-1,3. 25-30 it 40 1.5.3.0 C nt.r pap -.p (,bob ,prey) V Hunlar PROS-06-MP2000O.H 15-/7AI 40 .33,.79 6' pop-.p(ahnb 'pray) ® ® W Hunlar PROS-O6-MP20ODO.H 15-1]11 40 .33..79 6' p.D-up(lawn licim) y q Yy Hunlar PROS-06-MPIOOO O,H 121t 40 119..37 ,6' pop-up(,hnb Aln,y) O p Hunlar PRO S-06-MP800SRO.H 8-12ft 40 .23..42 8' pap-.p(,hnb ,pray) 8 Hunter PROS-06-LCS,RCS-515 BILLION 30 0.65 (oda 'trip 'pro,) 13 Hunlar PROS -06 -CS -530 54L30N 30 0.65 (sada Trip spray) Hunter PCB 50 ........ comp A It 30 .5 (ehnb bubble spray far p.IIr ) b.pblar NIBCO t-113 Cat. valla in round wlv. bo, - I,a aliad ® Hunlar ICZ-FS- 101 'lie: 3/4" in valva ba. ® Hunlar PLY MOG Ellldk R,mote C,,lal ,iia per plan CM FEBCO 825Y 1' REDUCED PRESSURE BACKROW PREVENTER DEVICE pY W.b., molar (a.l,ting) ID Hunter i -cora 16 'kation, Irrigation ...Nailer (Walt mounted -.ea pion for I ... Ban) p� Humor S.loayne - wind", ran een.r - CanNacl.r 1, mount unit onto I, .T nal veva 0 Reinbird 11-1, v91vv Non-proa .b...1 v d6p6n. piping (drip tubing) 2' cover under mulch ar 9roundcaver tr 'li Nan-prveaure poly lin. Piping (drip I.binq) .n grada in,knl.N.n with drip .miller par 1061 ..inaird LF5 O PVC Sch, 80 r- Tar pollary — Non-pra„ure lateral Iina piping PVC Sch. 40 12' Non-pre'aun katal IIn. piping PVC Sch. 40 W ra'ilitivA v only an 'lope 12" cover — P—a'. main lino Piping WC Sch. AO 18" Heaving under paving FNC C1. 315 24" .aver (2 TIMES PIPE SIZE) m tali prior is place tlrbaway LaWrai rill, to ba SCH, 40 PIPE O Rcinbird 33DNP: 3/4' Ouick Coupling Valva P.Or.C�{.� POINT OF CONNECTION TO STUB OUT PROVIDED BY GEN. CONTRACTOR ALL/ Mainline 'ria —VALVE NO. A—1 VALVE SIZE —w- � 4 8 —C.P,M saR .f nyaral.n. —.-112 sDFr IRR?NON N.— 1.ALL LATERAL LANES SIZE HOT SHOWN SHALL BE 3/4' DIAMETER 2.INSTALL CHECK VALVES TO SPRINKLER HEADS AT BOTTOM Of SLOPE. 3. FIELD ADJUST ALL SPRINKLERS TO ELIMINATE OVER SPRAY ONTO SIDEWALKS AND ORNEWAYS. 4,INSTALL IRRICATION SLEEVES UNDER DRTVCWAY, PAVEMENT PRIOR. TOINSTALLATIOII OF HAROSC PE. COORDINATE WITH GENERAL CONTRACTOR. S. ELECTRICAL SOURCE FOR IRRIGATION CONTROLLER TO BE PROVIDED BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR. LOCATION TO BE CLOSE TO PROPOSED CONTROLLER S. ALL IMPROVEMENTS SHALL COMPLY WITH ME STANDARD UNIFORM BUILDING CODE 2. All IMPROVEMENTSARE to BE 1MINTAINEO BY CONTRACTOR UNTIL MNNTEfIAfICE RESPONSIBILITY IS MINIM OVER TO ME NEW OWNER. IRRIGATION DESIGNER ®®®®®® bra aam ®®®® as aa0 ED SHBOHDi LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IRRIGATION PLAN OU RESJrJFNCE 2551 9rald'd (Anne Or— Dianund Our, CA 91755 SE-IGNZD S' r_,CIPI-lal DRITCD 9y. ESIRiBDHPI !11.M 02?516 scaE L7 OF Ln SHEETS 7. _11531 POP-UP SPRAY HEAD WALL MOUNT CONTROLLER' LL_ l a u.wrww - r n. umwwnuluw I�� ��<FI - wxwxxr6 )� .ry ll�,�allllj.'�uv nc will --1—raw SHRUB HEAD DETAIL TRENCHING REMOTE CONTROL VALVE IN BOX It.�h+�rIMNmM1'In'JCiasHtt:mr;maYt:.Y(fSPoiNM(1✓ �1 O 0 7o - Q "Ohi i. LACE qE DawN SrArlfs EVERT O REE FEET IN sARa, reaR.FEET W LOA., ARa FIVE FEET IN CLAY. 7. AT fR11Has WHERE (HERE is A CHARGE OF DIRECTION such As TEES gR Maws. USE PE -GOWN STARES CN EACH UO OF THE C—CE gF aIRECTOR. SUBSURFACE DRIPLINE DETAIL DRIP ZONE VALVE crux r ae Q era Q v n w Q' 1Croammornwnrrrx! Oa rYw,alnm WATER EFFICIENCY CALCULATON Qi ANaIVWEed CfflNinara E. 1„ QS n'RN WOE P Pea QMITIrz-ism-z[ nm -u nla (ma � s¢sAlgz D ss ra m Imp s s Q sgON MF q rEOze W a QQ le -:r Mem naE Omrle � Qa wR eo ca[ le'HE '( -• •. (D—IRROREh—cs b•'�:!(,r �_ orf, Ei vma� As per irrigation legend shown on drawings (�I !�! -p y�.-•� 9. 09 7/!' Mus OA9fla W\R I��o� r�sr�iuon, (�vc aP ams p) DRIP ZONE VALVE crux r ae Q era Q v n w Q' 1Croammornwnrrrx! Oa rYw,alnm WATER EFFICIENCY CALCULATON TC CALCatATEArAWA• o a VfaNrxllew CfflNinara E. 1„ .11sllmr .1hi1,d \4'.r r.Wo rCEq..- \IA11'.l-r1F711x Ili.l._IIIN.7 . 1 11 �Rii . 1I.AR famishing all labor, foals, materials. appliances. lasts. permits, etc., necessary for the installation of a landscape irrigation 10 GLCU .aTYlu. Ewm Fool arumr a Ere I IE Iwo rnamu! reams i i IRRIGATION A. Tho work Included Is mese specifications shall a nsist al the F,llaru. T-1 --V.. famishing all labor, foals, materials. appliances. lasts. permits, etc., necessary for the installation of a landscape irrigation I4R'N-Ilio.. nQiill,F.fln�lfr.1111 systems, as shown an the drawings. Does E'TWucumirY7 I I Ybs-ETPlU Does Not Exceed Nimimum Allmved nit ..'a—vel.—cul.. arc amm+l.m BACKFLOW PREVENTER GATE VALVE IRRIGATION A. Tho work Included Is mese specifications shall a nsist al the w0a�'.nc famishing all labor, foals, materials. appliances. lasts. permits, etc., necessary for the installation of a landscape irrigation QaL systems, as shown an the drawings. 0 wa4Ym"W"r. nit Irl Omrle _,• � ware, 9j, 0a wNuv cAFc aexx[ � z irrw wr.w aura ar 2. IRRIGATION MATERIALS vma� As per irrigation legend shown on drawings Oemt(i of l, !�! -p y�.-•� Awa :a .a era!! 3. VERIFICATIONS I��o� r�sr�iuon, rviarun 1 RE tall � ar¢ LANDSCAPE DRIPLINE FLUSH POINT No 9GLE ROTOR HEAD (ON SLOPE) assons "rwrybi3.0 ,.u. ery XERI-TUBE-PC 1. SCOPE OF WORK IRRIGATION A. Tho work Included Is mese specifications shall a nsist al the DESIGNER famishing all labor, foals, materials. appliances. lasts. permits, etc., necessary for the installation of a landscape irrigation systems, as shown an the drawings. ®®®®®® ®® S. It is the intent f these specifications toaccomplish the work of installation of lion tem c m lets and operable in an seri rr ser p opera ®®®® efficient and satisfactory manner according to the workmanlike standards established for sprinkler operation far full coverage. ®® ' 2. IRRIGATION MATERIALS vma� As per irrigation legend shown on drawings ED SIRIBOHDI LANDSCAPE ARCHTECT 3. VERIFICATIONS 422 Park floss Ave. A. Before din with bidding r work, the contractor shall careful) check and verify oil dimensions and shall t proceeding any g a y en y recur any Monrovia' CA 628/ 780-2020 variations to the owner and/or his authorized representative eMi eairizohdgradcan B. The contractor shall verify and be familiar with the location, size, pressure, and detail at slubouts provided as the source of water supply to the irrigation system as shown on the drawings. C. The contractor finding any discrepancies on the drawings during bidding and /or prior to proceeding with any work, shall notify the w er anhis authorized representative of such discrepancies, otherwise the contractor must assume full responsibility for any and all necessary revisions. D. All focal. municipal and stale laws, rules and regulate a governing or related to any portion f this work aro hereby incorporated into and made a part of these specifications and their provisions shall by carried out by the 'irrigation contractor. E. The contractor shalt verily the correctness of or knish grades within the work area in order to insure the proper soil coverage (as specified) of the irrigation system. ' 4. RECORD DRAWINGS The contractor shall furnish to the owner a complete set of the original plans indicating any changes marked in red link and showing the exact locations of all items installed. These are to be delivered on or before Rnal Inspection. S. TRENCHING Trenches far plastic pipe shall provide a minimum earth cover of 18" above the top of the pipe for all mainlines and 12" minimum cover all lateral Ines. 6. PRESSURE TESTING A All mainlines in the system shall be capped and pressure tested at 120 psi for a period of two (3) hours. Any ]sake found shall be corrected by removing the leaking pipe or Fillings and installing new material in its plata IRRIGATION S. All laterals shall be pressure tested for a period of ane (1) hear at the design pressure of the system. C. The contractor shall not allow to cause any al his walk to be covered Or enclosed until it hos been inspected, DETAILS & tested and approved by the owner and/or his authorized representative. SPECS. ' 7. COVERAGE TEST When the irrigation system is complete. the contractor. in the presence of the ow and/or his authorized representative shall perform a test of coverage of water afford the turf and planting areas, complete and adequate. The contractor shoo furnish oil materials and perform all work required to correct any inadequacies of coverage at his own cost. S. CONTROLLER A. Tho controller loco tion shall be as noted on the drawings or as. located by the owner and/or his authorized representative. 8. The 120 volt service hook-up to the controller shall be by the owner. it is the responsibility of the ximba.tar to notify the ownar when the controller is ready for the 120 ..It hook-up. 9. LOW VOLTAGE CONTROLLER WIRE A. All common ground wire shtlh be white. S. Where several valves are manifold. different color wire shah be used on positive wires far each valve. C. For wrrc snag, refer to the manufacturer's shorts. D. No wimeis to be spliced between the valve and the controller waver at vaive lacalion. E. Ali volve hook-ups shall be with Rain Bird "Pen -lite Hire connections or equal. F. All control wires shall be installed within the mainline trenches. 10. CLEAN-UP A. the contractor shall keep the premises clean and Free of excess equipment, materials. and rubbish incidental to work of this section. B. Upon the completion of all irrigation work and before final acceptance. the contractor shall ry ov all material. equipment. and debris resulting tram his walk. All served a s shall be bloomed clean and the site left in neat and acceptable conditions as approved by the owner and/or his authorized representative. �TT-�!'r� 11. GUARANTEE _ RICIDEMCE The entire ' lion system shall be teed b me contractor as to materials, and workmanship, including raga ys a for y e Setting of backfield areas below grade for a period of one (1) year following the date of lino) acceptance of the work. ' 2651 3ralded N.— Or— Oinnond Be,. CA 91755 12, 6LFAM - UP Upon the completion of all Irrigation work• and before final acceplance, the contractor shall remove all material, equipment, and debris resulting from his work. All paved areas shall be timomed clean and the site left in o neat and acceptable condition as approved by the owner and/or his authorized representative. 13. FINAL INSPECTION A. The project will not be completed until linal inspection is conducted and approved by the owner and/or his authorized representative. .8. The project owner and/or his authorized representative and the contractor shall be present as the final inspection. ".If, after the inspection, the oviner is of the opinion that all work has been performed as per the drawings and specifications. and that the plant materials are In satisfactory growing condition. he will give the contractor written notice of acceptance. D. Work requiring corrective action o w replacement in the judgement of the o andter his authorized representative shall be performed An. toll (10) day,- after the Final inspeclion. Corrective work andmaterials replacement shall be made in accordance ' with drawings and specifications and shall by Made by the contractor at no cost to the Owner. sESIGNEU e1, ECIFILDl,a IIED eY' CCIF!oaNai TnrE neass u - ee+loons SHEER L8 aF La -HEFT- N IL (0 Nt C C: C: 0 0 0 0 0 0 (o _0 ca m cu �-o 10 10 10 10 1.0 - ca m cu cu cu CN c m c .2 .2 (D 0 .0 .0 C: m CL 0. 0. 0- (0 U) (D 0- m 0. cu CL ca 0. cu a cu CL cu co (U a) (D a) a) (D (D Nt 0 CL CL CL CL CL CL 0 0 L) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (D C: C: C: C: 0 0 0 0 0 0 C) 0 a) a) (D w (D CY) 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 TD > 0 0 0 0 0 (0 cu cu C m a m rm m .0 L) E (D E -c-) E 0- �o CL CL CL r — U 0 0 0 - 0 'a - 0 co 40— C- D 0-4— < Q-4— < r— 0.1 < r— CL < CL < 7 cu C: III , r— C: M a) il i 0 U) (1) — 0 •0 (1) 3: >, 7e A ca CL a Z 0 0 U) M . .. ... c U.1 cn L) ca a) 0 :D 0 co r -L w U.1 1-- LLJ F- Z FW W F - LLJ ui F- Z z z z z 00 rn co LO ti vN 0) 0 rn LO C? LO U) L() LO LO U') C) LO to U") — a) C 0 0 N _j DL 0 LL -J DL 0- CL N IL ry 0- ry IL ry ry CL 0- w U) a) a) W Q) (D 70 z > 111 L) 2) 2 a) " Co w > It. > — > > F- Z 0 E E 0 E E m III — E U) ca ca a) a) " 'ca m m III 0 E (D 422 ci O cp 0 > 0 O a) 0 T cr, C C: n E a) >.ff a) > > C: > E > 2 �:, a) r- C a) 0 C: 0 (n CU U) V) C: OU a) O w 'm 0 W CL (n (n r_ cc C—n 0 E m E cn ca a) C 0 o 0 0 z (D 0 2 -@ .— C) r-) a) a, — Lu 0 C rz 0 -J 0 M ;-n U) > t� [z z z ca q 0.2 c 6 co C6 c (—n LL U) LL 0 a. z Z < .2 00 N Lij Z. z .2 co co c: C14 :t� 0 (D to 30): 00 (0 co ra LO (D CO 0 z 111 U') -0 0 :r. 00 L — U) CN N N a) N ch CY) Z Z a3): 'IT Z VO O IL CL C\l C\l z _ 021 z CL I U') :s I (0— NQ 7 cu IL W 0) (D 2 E .Q .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 0 0 _0_0 "a � 'a "a _0 � a 70 cu cu m cu w m m cu cc cu 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 lo- 10 10 C: C: M cc ca m m (a cu m m cuom cu (U C: 0 C 0 C . 0 r_ .2 C: 0 c .0 c .0 a .0 C: .0 c .0 .0 .0 U)• :3 a CL 0. 0. CL CL CL CL CL CL CL 0. CL 0. CL 0. CL 0. CL 0. CL CL CL CL M cu m cu cu cu m (D a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) CL E 0- E CL E 0- E cl E CL E CL E CL E 0- E CL E CL E 0. E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4- 0 0 0 'a (D '0 a) '0 (D "a (D '0 a) '0 (D -a a) 'a a) -a a) '0 a) '0 a) 'a a) > C: a 0 C: a o> . a) 0 Cc 0 Q) - > 0 cc 0 0 Cc 0 0 CC 0 0 cc 0 0 cc 0 0 r_ c 0 0 cc 0 . T > 0 cc 0 0 cc 0 L Mm = ca cu a) = mm a) = m cu 4= cu cu P mm = m m = m m 4= cu cu *r-- cc m W = m m = m m E .9 E E .0 E )E .2 E S2 E .0 E .0 E E -L) E E flo 'a " -o 0. ZO 0- ZO CL ZO CL ZO C C L < CL 40- < C 0- 40- < C: C: 0.40- < 0-10 < CL 1.0- < C: 0- < 0. C: < 0- C: < CL c: < c C- �_o < r- 0-,o < U) 0) C: 0) co :.CL CL ca 50) 0 .E Q) 0) cu 0 co M E m 0 > lS M ca (D 0 r c 0 0 :>Z ca E < m co n a) 0 CL z w w z z uj w w uj Z w w F- z z 5; w z 75 z z z to co co O C 0) co LO N 0) m to 0 co m L? C� C� C� L? T (0 (6 (0 (0 m LO LO LO LO LO Ln "T LO - 0 a) C) 0 0 0 0 C) C C) 0 C) 0 0 N N J N rv, rr o o - cm J(D C: a) C: a) a)C a) a) 0 a) 0 :3 a) a) a)> 0 a) > > C: a) C: a) M > :2 cn Cl) C: m cn CIO E >01 U) - ". 0 E 42 a) co a) E 'co E Cu U) 2 U) 2 a) C: o 0 0 a) a) = (D 4M- r- Q) cu - C: a) a) a) 2� - *E Z a) c - a) M u) Co U) > 'n > tQ -0 a) 9) E (D E a O. &, o co a) 0) w c a C: ca a) E .�= co cr.9 0 co ,C c - 0 42 -r- E 0 4CU- w 0 0 420 0 0 E c 0 0 -Oa 420 IC -U- E o),- 0 cn 0 CD cn :2 a) a) 0) CD 0 a) 0) (D U- 4 a) M U) FL U) 0 a) O. cu *&' (D O. CD a) -0 cn -j 00 7&, L) = z ca w -@ E a cu (n E a) (D a" E - 0 Z > If m U - r- * Fn 'i -n -i C: c/i 0 C: :E a - -a 1� �: .2 U) 0 .2.s U) .2 c: I- -, (D cl CL C14 It U.) S Z 00 (n CY) �: .9 (14 .2 - co �5 = co �5 "t .- LD t� 00 CY) - :!- co Vt LO LO C) -0 -a co 0) LO r - z w 0 0 A Z O cu E U- M (0 a) � cO a) LCO, � "t -0 C,� It -a 'It ca V, 5; m C', Z m co N (3D: CC,41 Z Cq z N t CY) a) Z a) Cj N CL a_ N- C\l - 4- C\l Z W 2 Q IL m 0Z Z W cO 2 G 0- 0 J W LL i }O W U � Z 0 O U NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING AND AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 1, Stella Marquez, declare as follows: On March 8, 2016, the Diamond Bar Planning Commission will hold a Regular Meeting at 7:00 p.m. at City, Windmill Community Room, 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California. I am employed by the City of Diamond Bar. On March 4, 2016, a copy of the Planning Commission Agenda was posted at the following locations: South Coast Quality Management District Auditorium 21865 East Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Diamond Bar Library 21800 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765' Heritage Park 2900 Brea Canyon Road Diamond Bar, CA 91765 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct Executed on March 4, 2016, at Diamond Bar, California. Stella Marquez CDAzste11a\affidavitposfing.doc VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM:— SUBJECT: M0 N—&CV�2 TO: Planning Commission DATE: SPEAKER I NAME: Kah 0 Fto mg . (Please print clearly) ADDRESS: dj- t9e��- V (Please print clear ) would like to address the Planning Commission on the above stated item. Please have the Commission Minutes reflect my name and address as printed above Sig Peo Note: This form is intended to assist the Chairman in ensuring that all persons wishing to address the Commission will have the opportunity to do so, and to ensure correct spelling of names in the Minutes. After completion, please submit your form to the Planning Commission Secretary. Thank you. ru RECEivED d ClTy of DIAmoND BAR r FAIA II/L1G'L.Gr- no r