The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About01/26/2016 PC AgendaPLANNING AGENDA January 26, 2016 7:00 VIII P.M. City Hall, Windmill Community Room 21810 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Vice Chairperson Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Jen "Fredy" Mahike Frank Farago Bob Nishimura Raymond Wolfe Copies of staff reports or other written documentation relating to agenda items are on file in the Planning Division of the Community Development Department, located at 21810 Copley Drive, and are available for public inspection. If you have questions regarding an agenda item, please call (909) 839-7030 during regular business hours. Written materials distributed to the Planning Commission within 72 hours of the Planning Commission meeting are available for public inspection immediately upon distribution in the City Clerk's office at 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California, during normal business hours. In an effort to comply with the requirements of Title I/ of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the City of Diamond Bar requires that any person in need of any type of special equipment, assistance or accommodation (s) in order to communicate at a City public meeting must inform the Community Development Department at (909) 839-7030 a minimum of 72 hours prior to the I scheduled meeting. U&NO �D BAR -rk flih, of n;nmnnr1 Anr ii-,zP.q rprvr.11pd Please retrain trom smoKing, earing ui paper and encourages you to do the same drinking in the Windmill Community Room F!kn of Diamond []a[ Planning Commission PUBLIC INPUT MEETING RULES ' The meetings of the Diamond Bar Planning Commission are open to the public. Amember Ofthe public may address the Commission oDthe subject Ofone ormore agenda items and/or other items Ofwhich are within the SUhieCt matter jurisdiction Of the Di8OD� B8[ Planning Commission. A request to address the (�Onl ^iosiOD should be submitted in writing at the public heariDg, to the Secretary of the ConnnlioeiOO. As 8 general [Ule, the opportunity for public CO[DnleOtS will take cd8De at the discretion of the Choi[ HoweVer, in order tOfacilitate the meeting, persons who are interested parties for 8D item may be requested tOgive their presentation @tthe time the item iscalled oOthe calendar. The Chair may limit individual public input to five DliDUteS OO any item; or the Chair may limit the total aDlOUOt of time allocated for public testimony based on the number of people requesting to speak and the business of the Commission. Individuals are requested to dOOdUctthemselves iDaprofessional and businesslike manner. COnODleOtS and questions are vVe|COVnB SV that all points of view are considered prior to the CoOlDlisSiOO making recommendations tDthe staff and City Council. In accordance with State Law (Brown Act), all matters to be acted on by the Commission must be posted at least 72 hours prior to the CO[DOlissiOO meeting. In C8Se of emergency or when a SUhiBCt matter arises subsequent to the posting of the agenda, upon making certain findings-, the Commission may act Onitem that isnot oOthe posted agenda. INFORMATION RELATING TO AGENDAS AND ACTIONS OF THE COMMISSION Agendas for Diamond Bar Planning Commission meetings are prepared by the Planning Division of the Community Development Department. Agendas are available 72hours prior tOthe meeting atCity Hall and the pVb|\C library, and may be accessed by personal CODlpUte[ at the contact iOfVFDl8tioD below. Every meeting of the P|8OOiDg CODlDl\sSiVn is recorded and duplicate recordings are gV8i|@b\e for 3 nominal charge. ADA REQUIREMENTS Acordless microphone i3available for those persons with mobility impairments who cannot access the public speaking area. The Sen/ice of the CO[d|egs microphone and sign |@OgU8ge interpreter SerV|CBg are available bygiving notice 8tleast three business days iOadvance ofthe meeting. Please telephone (909) 839-7030 between 7:30a.Dl. and 5:30 p.m., Monday through Thursday, and 7:30a.[n. and 4:30 p.m., Friday. HELPFUL CONTACT INFORMATION Copies of Agenda, Rules of the CO[DDliSsiOD. COs of Meetings (809) 839-7030 Email: CITY OF DIAMOND BAR PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, January 26, 2016 CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Next Resolution No. 2016-05 1. ROLL CALL: COMMISSIONERS: Frank Farago, Bob Nishimura, Raymond Wolfe, Vice Chairperson Jen "Fred" Mahlke 2. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is the time and place for the general public to address the members of the Planning Commission on any item that is within their jurisdiction, allowing the public an opportunity to speak on non-public hearing and non -agenda items. Please complete a Speaker's Card for the recordinq Secretary (completion of this form is voluntary). There is a five-minute maximum time limit when addressing the Planning Commission. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Chairman 4. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following items listed on the consent calendar are considered routine and are approved by a single motion. Consent calendar items may be removed from the agenda by request of the Commission only: 4.1 Minutes of Regular Meeting: 5. OLD. BUSINESS: None 6. NEW BUSINESS: None 7. PUBLIC HEARING(S): January 12, 2016 7.1 Development Review No. PL2015-464 — Under the authority of Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.48, the applicant and property owner is requesting a Development Review to add 486 square feet to the first floor of an existing single- family residence on a 0.54 gross acre lot. The subject property is zoned Low Density Residential (RL) with an underlying General Plan land use designation of Low Density Residential (RL). Project Address: 21458 Cold Spring Lane Diamond Bar, CA 91765 JANUARY 12, 2016 PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA Property Owner: Adam Hui Gu and Zhi Jun Mo 21458 Cold Spring Lane Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Applicant: Jason Sun 2275 Hungtington Drive, #347 San Marino, Ca 91108 Environmental Determination: The project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on that assessment, the City has determined the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to Article 19 under Section 15301(e)(1) (additions to existing structures) of the CEQA Guidelines. No further environmental review is required. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review No. PL2015-464, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the draft resolution. 7.2 Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL2015-98 — Under the authority of Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.48 and 22.56, the applicant and property owner are requesting a Development Review approval to construct a 1,249 square -foot, two-story addition, 298 square -foot patio/balcony, and a 63 square -foot porch to an existing 1,555 square -foot, two single-family residence with an attached 438 two -car garage on a 0.35 gross acre lot. A Minor Conditional Use Permit is requested to allow a second -story addition to an existing nonconforming structure with an 11 -foot distance to the structure on the adjacent lot to the south (where 15 feet is required). The subject property is zoned Low Medium Density Residential (RLM) with an underlying General plan land use designation of Low Density Residential. Project Address: 505 Bellows Court Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Property Owner/ Justin Lee Applicant: 505 Bellows Court Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Environmental Determination: The project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on that assessment, the City has determined the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to Article 19 under Section 15303(e) (additions to existing structures) of the CEQA Guidelines. No further environmental review is required. JANUARY 12, 2016 91 441 10. PAGE 3 PLAN N ING, COMMISSION AGENDII Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PI -2015-98, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the draft resolution. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS / INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: STAFF COMMENTS / INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 9.1 Public Hearing dates for future projects SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: CITY COUNCIL MEETING: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: PRESIDENT'S DAY TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING: PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING: n11000rTT0-Wr91TF-.TkN i "J?k Tuesday, February 2, 2016 — 6:30 p.m. South Coast Air Quality Management District Auditorium, 21825 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA Tuesday, February 9, 2016 Diamond Bar City Hall, Windmill Community Room 21810 Copley Drive Monday, February 15, 2016 In observance of the holiday, City offices will be closed. City offices will re -open on Tuesday, February 16, 2016. Thursday, February 11, 2016 Diamond Bar City Hall, Windmill Community Room 21810 Copley Drive Thursday, February 25, 2016 Diamond Bar City Hall, Windmill Community Room - 21810 Copley Drive MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 12, 2016 CALL TO ORDER: Vice Chairperson Mahlke called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Windmill Room, 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Commissioner Wolfe led the Pledge of Allegiance. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Frank Farago, Bob Nishimura, Raymond Wolfe, Vice Chairperson Jennifer "Fred" Mahlke Also present: Greg Gubman, Community Development Director; James Eggart, Assistant City Attorney; Grace Lee, Senior Planner; Natalie T. Espinoza, Assistant Planner; Josue Espino, Planning Consultant; and Stella Marquez, Administrative Coordinator. 2. RECOGNITION OF OUTGOING COMMISSIONER RUTH LOW. 3. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: None 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: As presented 5. CONSENT CALENDAR: 5.1 Minutes of the Regular Meeting of November 24, 2015. C/Wolfe moved, C/Nishimura seconded, to approve the Minutes of the November 24, 2015, Meeting as presented. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: 6. OLD BUSINESS: None Farago, Nishimura, Wolfe, VC/Mahlke None None JANUARY 12, 2016 7. A NEW BUSINESS: 7.1 General Plan Status Report for 2015 PLANNING COMMISSION SP/Lee presented staff's report and recommended that the Planning Commission forward said report to City Council to Receive and File. C/Wolfe asked when the traffic control devices on the shoulder of westbound Grand Avenue approaching Longview would be removed. SP/Lee responded that her understanding is that all major improvements have been completed and that Public Works staff is scheduling a final inspection to verify improvement completion and that all work items have been satisfied. C/Wolfe asked if residents could expect additional lane closures and SP/Lee said she did not believe that would happen. C/Nishimura said he believed that when the project was completed they removed barriers and then had to put them back to repair a couple of bricks that had popped out. SP/Lee said she would follow up with Public Works staff but her understanding is that the inspections will be wrapped up and barriers will be removed shortly. C/Farago moved, C/Nishimura seconded, to recommend that the City Council Receive and File the General Plan Status Report for 2015. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING(S): Farago, Nishimura, Wolfe; VC/Mahlke None None 8.1 Conditional Use Permit No. PL2015-395 - Under the authority of Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Section 22.58, the property owner and applicant requested a Conditional Use Permit to operate a 1,980 square foot dance studio within a 36,398 square foot multi -tenant shopping center. The subject property is zoned Regional Commercial (C-3) with an underlying General Plan land use designation of General Commercial (C). PROJECT ADDRESS: 303 S. Diamond Bar Boulevard #H Diamond Bar, CA 91765 JANUARY 12, 2016 PROPERTY OWNER Fg-OMM PLANNING COMMISSION Phoenix Gluck LP 3191-D Airport Loop Drive Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Yulia Kushnirenko and Denis Podolskiy 13115 Le Parc #27 Chino Hills, CA 91709 AP/Espinoza presented staff's report and recommended Planning Commission approval of Conditional Use Permit No. PL2015-395, based on the Findings of Fact and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the Resolution. VC/Mahlke opened the public hearing. Applicant Denis Podolskiy said this was a great opportunity to operate that new dance studio in Diamond Bar and looked forward to commencing operation as soon as possible. VC/Mahlke closed the public hearing. C/Nishimura moved, C/Wolfe seconded, to approve Conditional Use Permit No. PL2015-395, based on the Findings of Fact and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the Resolution. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Farago, Nishimura, Wolfe, VC/Mahlke NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None 8.2 Development Review No. PL2013-555 - Under the authority of Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.48, the applicant and property owner requested a Development Review to construct a new 8,328 square foot, two-story single family residence with an attached 2,036 square foot garage and 1,821 square feet of patio area on a 61,600 gross square foot (1.41 gross acre) lot. The subject property is zoned Rural Residential (RR) with a consistent underlying General Plan land use designation of Rural Residential (RR). Rescheduled from December 8, 2015. JANUARY 12, 2016 0 .0 0 0 - • 0 2 K N PAGE 4 PLANNING COMMISSION 22586 Pacific Lane Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Jerry Yeh Horizon Pacific LLC 20888 Amar Road #203 Walnut, CA 91789 AP/Espinoza presented staff's report and recommended Planning Commission approval of Development Review No. PI -2013-555, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. CDD/Gubman further explained that this project stands alone and does not require Alamo Heights Drive to be extended. The extension of Alamo Heights Drive is a component of the Millennium Subdivision which has not yet been recorded. If and when the Millennium Subdivision records and development moves forward and Alamo Heights Drive is constructed, the discussion in staffs report is being provided to illustrate that the terraced retaining walls would be buried by construction of Alamo Heights Drive which would eliminate the visual impacts of the retaining walls; however, should the Millennium project not move forward the retaining walls would support the development pad for this item under consideration this evening. Amat Tajudin with EGTA Architects in Irvine thanked staff members who have helped his firm navigate through this process, especially with regard to the Millennium project. Mr. Tajudian explained the project and explained that the intent was to keep the massing low on the site by blending it into the landscape and existing community. Alamo Heights is a small enclave and the intent is to create a Tuscan/Provence type of "village" in the area. He and his clients are eager to move forward with the project and are present to respond to Commission questions. C/Nishimura asked for further clarification regarding the individuals concern about the retaining wall as to whether it was the wall that was to be covered or the future Alamo Heights Drive retaining wall and AP/Espinoza responded that it is the screened retaining wall proposed for this project. C/Nishimura asked if the applicant would be responsible for watering the landscape materials in the retaining wall and AP/Espinoza responded affirmatively. JANUARY 12, 2016 PAGE 5 PLANNING COMMISSION C/Wolfe asked if there was sufficient room for the planting to occur on the backside of the retaining wall and accommodate road access for maintenance purposes and AP/Espinoza responded yes and explained that there is a small planter area inside of the curb to accommodate the plantings and the width of the roadway is sufficient for which it is intended. Hofu Wu lives at 22368 Kicking Horse Drive said he is an architect and professor at Cal Poly Pomona. In general, he supports the development of beautiful and sustainably designed houses. His concerns include his removed fence which the developer agreed to reconstruct when the grading was completed which was two years ago and there is still an orange barrier temporary fence in place. He felt the fencing should be replaced prior to new grading for this project to protect the integrity of both properties. Second, due to the prolonged period of construction and lingering noises, the dirt must be controlled to limit the loose soil and dust which spill over onto his building fagade. He wondered whether it was legal to construct on the easement and what would happen to the retaining wall if the Millennium project does not move forward. He asked that his concerns be addressed as conditions to this project. Theresa Lee who lives off of Kicking Horse asked about the import and export of soil and where the soil would be exported and how it would be imported. Because The Country is very unique it does not allow soil to be exported, only imported. The state has mandated a 25 percent reduction in water usage and the applicant intends to irrigate and wanted to know if the mandate would rest with the homeowner or become a liability to the homeowner's association. She wanted to know where the storm drain would drain and whether it would drain onto the hillside which would result in erosion. She wanted the dust issue addressed and wanted to know if the retaining wall had the approval of the HOA. Joe Leyva responded to speakers that the soil is stockpiled on the adjacent site. Lots one and two were left high so that dirt could be moved from those lots and soil has been stockpiled for lots under construction. The amount of soil to be imported is yet to be determined. He understands the concern that this project is going to be importing from other areas within The Country but that is false. There will be no import of dirt from other sites within The Country. The landscape plan includes the use of drought -tolerant landscaping and irrigation methods for this and all lots in this project which will include watering the retaining walls. The water for this area is the responsibility of the homeowners until the Millennium project and Alamo JANUARY 12, 2016 PAGE 6 PLANNING COMMISSION Heights is built and accepted by the HOA. Until that time, the property line for this project runs to the outside of the bottom retaining wall. The easement begins on the other side so Millennium will be building on this property as well as on their easement property. The County's storm drain system has been designed and approved for about five years per County standards and is in operation. This system accepts water from the homes to the north which flows -through the project site and exits into a natural drainage course to the south that will be addressed by Millennium through their development. This project is not allowed to touch the system because Fish & Game and the US Army Corps of Engineers have disallowed any activity in that area. The project has taken steps to mitigate the dust and today is the first that he has heard about the dust issue resulting from construction of this project. Unfortunately, construction took longer to get to Lot 5 because it was mandated by the City Council to work with Millennium to make the projects match. The retaining walls are within the project site's property and within the development standards which were approved by the HOA. The reason the white fence has not been replaced on the other property is because the City's engineering staff said the overall tract grading could not be finalized until Lot 5 was approved so at this point, the project will prepare an "as built" and once the grading is completed, the siting of the fence will be done and it will be replaced. VC/Mahlke asked for clarification that the storm drain is designed, approved and operational. Mr. Leyva responded that VC/ ' Mahlke was correct and that it has been installed for about two years when it was accepted by LA County. C/Farago asked about the timeline for restoring the white fence and Mr. Leyva responded that if the project is approved this evening, plans will be submitted to Building and Safety which will take three to four months for approval with grading to commence in two to three months and the hope is that by August there would be signoff on the rough grading so that the white fence could be replaced. C/Farago asked what kind of dust measures will be implemented. Mr. Leyva said he would speak with his graders about having water trucks to mitigate the dust. Part of the challenge is that the slopes have been seeded but the landscaping will not be installed until the houses are completed. C/Nishimura spoke off mike about the stockpiling of dirt, dust mitigation and stockpiling of building materials. Mr. Leyva responded that all five lots are JANUARY 12, 2016 PAGE 7 PLANNING COMMISSION subject to inspection by the City's Engineering Department to verify dust and water mitigation measures for the entire site on a monthly basis. CDD/Gubman stated in response to C/Nishimura's concerns that there are dust control measures and NPDES requirements for an ongoing construction project and this entire subdivision is subject to those requirements. Using watering vehicles to keep the soil under control is among those requirements and although those practices are inspected it does not mean that the developer is necessarily complying at all times but if the City receives complaints, a site visit will be made and enforcement tools will be initiated to require that the best practices be kept to City standards. The permit is subject to those requirements so in between inspections, staff will respond to complaints. Also, this subdivision has been annexed into The Diamond Bar Country Estates Association so the HOA has enforcement tools at its disposal to control the nuisance that might be created by airborne dust as well and there may be additional sanctions the HOA can impose if the project is creating a hardship on neighboring properties. C/Nishimura spoke off mike about building a retaining wall on the easement and ACA/Eggart responded by reiterating that the applicant indicated the retaining wall would not be built on an easement but on their property only. CDD/Gubman explained that the project limits are entirely within the subject property and there are easements on the subject property favoring other property owners and entities. The easement is more a property right that has been conveyed upon the beneficiary of the easement so it is more of a civil question about what types of improvements may occur within the easement. The applicant asserts that they are within their rights to perform these improvements within the easement and the presumption is that they have consulted with the beneficiary of the easement and they are not doing anything that would restrict the purpose of that easement. The City is not per se enforcing the terms of the easement and there is a civil remedy to the user of that easement if the property owner's end of the bargain is not being upheld. C/Nishimura asked if there was liability to the City for approving this project with a wall in the easement and ACA/Eggart responded "there is not." VC/Mahlke noted that staff's report indicates that The Diamond Bar Country Estates Architectural Committee has approved all of these plans which she JANUARY 12, 2016 PAGE 8 PLANNING COMMISSION assumed included all of the information including the easements. C/Nishimura said that The Country Estates is not the beneficiary of the easement. VC/Mahlke said she understood C/Nishimura's statement and said she was making a point that speaks to clarification for one of the speakers. CDD/Gubman explained that the city's decision to approve or disapprove this project is not dependent upon any decision by the HOA. Whatever is within the HOA's purview to approve or disapprove, it is the property owner's and not the City's obligation to meet those requirements. C/Nishimura asked if on the cross section of the retaining walls the existing road is in or outside of the easement for the property owner. Jerry Yeh, developer, responded that the current service road is on the Horizon Pacific property. The cross section (orange walls) are on the Horizon Pacific property and is not subject to interpretation of the easement owner. Ms. Lee said that if the HOA approved the easement wall and it changed in the future it would be subject to reconsideration by the HOA. She also complained that there was debris covering the stream at the bottom of the storm drain. Mr. Wu said he believed the fence could be done now without waiting until the grading was done because the fence is on his property. VC/Mahlke closed the Public Hearing. C/Wolfe moved, C/Farago seconded, to approve Development Review No. PL2013-555, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Farago, Nishimura, Wolfe, VC/Mahlke NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None 8.3 Development Review No. PL2015-370 — Under the authority of Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.48, the property owners and applicant requested a Development Review to demolish an existing single family home and construct a new 8,573 square foot, multi-level, single family JANUARY 12, 2016 PLANNING COMMISSION residence with an attached 600 square foot, three -car garage on a 58,806 gross square foot (1.35 gross acre) lot. The subject property is zoned Rural Residential (RR) with a consistent underlying General Plan land use designation of Rural Residential (RR). FWAT0111 I a, N WO I I 23728 Ridge Line Road Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Yong Hoon Na and Hye Won Na 23728 Ridge Line Road Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Rachel Choi Samwon Design, Inc. 2500 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 832 Los Angeles, CA 90057 PC/Espino presented staff's report and recommended Planning Commission approval of Development Review No. PL2015-370, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the Resolution. VC/Mahlke opened the public hearing. With no one present who wished to speak on this item, VC/Mahlke closed the public hearing. C/Nishimura moved, C/Farago seconded, to approve Development Review No. PL2015-370, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the Resolution. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS NOES: COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS Farago, Nishimura, Wolfe, VC/Mahlke None None 8.4 Development Review and Tree Permit No. PL2015-317 — Under the authority of Diamond Bar Municipal Code Sections 22.48 and 22.38, the 1-. 77 JANUARY 12, 2016 PAGE 10 PLANNING COMMISSION property owner and applicant requested a Development Review to construct a new 7,888 square foot, multi -story single family residence with an attached six -car garage and patio/balcony area on a 73,120 gross square foot (1.67 gross acre) lot. A Tree Permit was also requested to remove five (5) protected Black Walnut trees at a 3:1 replacement ratio. The subject property is zoned Rural Residential (RR) with a consistent underlying General Plan land use designation of Rural Residential (RR). PROJECT ADDRESS: 2502 Razzak Circle Diamond Bar, CA 91765 PROPERTY OWNER: Wasif Siddique 11076 Venture Drive Mira Loma, CA 91762 APPLICANT: Robert Larivee Award Winning Designs 14442 Crest Drive Victorville, CA 92395 PC/Espino presented staff's report and recommended Planning Commission approval of Development Review and Tree Permit No. PL2015-317, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the Resolution. VC/Mahlke opened the public hearing. With no one present who wished to speak on this item, VC/Mahlke closed the public hearing. C/Wolfe asked why staff indicated 24 -gallon (24 -inch box) trees for replacement when the Arborist recommended replacement with a 15 -gallon tree. PC/Espino said that although the code provides for 15 -gallon tree replacement, typically the city wants a slightly larger tree to have more root growth which provides for a better chance of survival. C/Wolfe said he has understood from his work environment that smaller trees have a better chance of being accepted into a new environment. Often larger trees are root bounded and there may be a reason the Arborist recommends planting something that is at a smaller scale. PC/Espino explained that these are the size the City has consistently required of all applicants. 4a A K PLANNING COMMISSION CDD/Gubman confirmed that Section 22.38.130 tree replacement and relocation standards requires the minimum box size for six or fewer replacement trees to be 24 -inch. If more than six (6) replacement trees are being provided, the sizes shall be determined by the Director who has the discretion to allow for smaller sized trees or, the Commission can make that decision. C/Wolfe said that generally the Arborist has a reason for recommending a certain size but perhaps not. CDD/Gubman said that C/Wolfe is correct in that the smaller trees will actually catch up and surpass the growth of a larger installed tree and the code gives the Commission the opportunity to allow the trees to be replaced in accordance with the recommendations of the Arborist. Therefore, if the Commission wishes to change the condition to 15 -gallon it has the authority to do so. C/Wolfe moved, C/Farago seconded, to approve Development Review and Tree Permit No. PL2015-317 with the following amendment that replacement of the five (5) protected Black Walnut trees be replaced at a 3:1 ratio with 15 -gallon trees instead of 24 -inch box trees. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Farago, Nishimura, Wolfe, VC/Mahlke NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None 9. PLANNING COMMISSIONER COMMENTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 9.1 Planning Commissioners Academy — Wednesday through Friday, March 2 through 4, 2016, San Ramon, CA CDD/Gubman said that if any Commissioners wish to attend the conference they are invited to do so. Money is provided in the budget to allow Commissioners to attend with travel, lodging and registration expenses covered. He asked Commissioners to advise him by the end of the week if they wish to be registered to attend. C/Wolfe reminded everyone about the Snow Fest on Saturday at Pantera Park. F-FlIN W-4 77, 117, JANUARY 12, 2016 PAGE 12 PLANNING COMMISSION VC/Mahlke thanked staff and Commissioners for their well -wishes and lovely flowers while she was in the hospital. She said she appreciated the support of her colleagues while serving as Acting Chair this evening. 10. STAFF COMMENTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 10.1 Public Hearing dates for future projects. CDD/Gubman announced that the agenda for the January 26 includes additions to single family residences, one on Cold Spring Lane and one on Bellow Court. He wished everyone a Happy New Year and said that staff is preparing an RFP to select a consultant for the General Plan Comprehensive Update which should be going out in early February. The Commission will be guided through the process. One step in the process is to set up a General Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC) which is typically comprised of members of the City Council, members of the Planning Commission and at least one representative from other city commissions, members of which will be guided to provide and incorporate their input, aspirations and vision for the next 20 years in Diamond Bar. The City is likely to see movement on the Kmart property. The Honda/Burger King property was supposed to be fenced today but does not believe that happened; however, a demolition contractor has been selected and those buildings and illegal dumping material will be cleared and that attractive nuisance will finally be removed from the City. The City has been pushing to attract a hotel developer for the site and staff hopes to see that happen. However, as discussed during the General Plan Annual Report, the trailer park property at Brea Canyon Road and Lycoming is a potential hotel and related use site. There may be a need for two hotels in the area but should the trailer park property move forward it makes the market conditions a little less favorable for hotel development on the Honda property and the City may have to re -strategize on the highest and best use for that site. With the new commercial building in the Target/Chili's Shopping Center, Starbucks at Grand and Diamond Bar Boulevard will relocate to the new building. He heard an unconfirmed report that a California restaurant chain is moving forward with a lease to open in the current Starbucks location and once he has confirmation he will share the information with the Commission. JANUARY 12, 2016 PAGE 13 PLANNING COMMISSION C/Nishimura asked if there would be a new business locating at the Just Tires location and CDD/Gubman responded that he was not aware of any inquiries about the site. C/Nishimura asked about the vacant Coco's site and CDD/Gubman responded that a new seafood restaurant is going in and the tenant improvement plans are with Building and Safety. C/Nishimura asked if there was a plan to save the electronic sign bordering the Honda property and CDD/Gubman said no because Phase I of the Confluence project will take out that sign. However, the City is supportive of having another sign with a new development which is something that can be negotiated at that time. VC/Mahlke said she was surprised and interested to learn that there would be a Jimmy John's instead of a Waba Grill. CDD/Gubman said that the City may get a Waba Grill at another location. 11. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: As listed in tonight's agenda. ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Planning Commission, VC/Mahlke adjourned the regular meeting at 8:31 p.m. The foregoing minutes are hereby approved this 26th day of January, 2016. Attest: Respectfully Submitted, Greg Gubman Community Development Director Jennifer Mahlke, Vice Chairperson ON 1111102! WAME Ai Wo"iIII"ililk '1' 2'' CITY OF DIAMOND BAR - 21810 COPLEY DRIVE - DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 - TEL. (909) 839-7030 - FAX (909) 861-3117 CASE/FILE NUMBER: PROJECT LOCATION: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONING DISTRICT: 1A January 26, 2016 Development Review No. PL2015-464 21458 Cold Spring Lane Diamond Bar, CA 91765 (APN 8714-001-012) Low Density Residential (RL) Low Density Residential (RL) Adam Hui Gu 21458 Cold Spring Lane Diamond Bar, CA 91765 APPLICANT: Jason Sun 2275 Huntington Drive #347 San Marino, CA 91108 PKIT �Mf� The applicant is requesting Development Review approval to construct a one-story addition consisting of 464 square feet of floor area to an existing 1,752 square -foot, one-story single-family residence with an attached 457 square -foot, two -car garage on a 0.54 gross acre lot. Adopt the attached Resolution (Attachment 1) approving Development Review No. PL2015-464, based on the findings of Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Sections 22.48, subject to conditions. The project site is located on t ' he west side of Cold Spring Lane, a local residential street, south of the intersection with Diamond Bar Boulevard. The property was developed in 1977 under Los Angeles County standards with a 1,752 square -foot, one-story single-family residence and a 457 square -foot, two -car garage on a 0.54 gross acre (23,590 gross square -foot) lot. There are no protected trees on site. The existing house is situated toward the front of the lot, 14 feet from the right-of-way line. The subject parcel is a deep, descending lot -368 feet in length—that extends to the Diamond Bar Boulevard right-of-way line. The buildable pad area is approximately 7,950 square feet. The remainder is undeveloped slope terrain visible from Diamond Bar Boulevard. The property is legally described as Lot 19 of Tract No. 32974, and the Assessor's Parcel Number (APN) is 8714-001-012. The following table describes the surrounding land uses located adjacent to the subject property: Z Development Review No. PL 2015-464 Page 2 of 6 South • Site I North Panoramic Street View of Project Site The proposed one-story addition consists of the following components: The existing one-story home consists of common areas (family room, game room, dining room, and kitchen), and private areas consisting of three bedrooms and two bathrooms. The new addition will be added to the front of the home. The floor area will be modified to allow for the creation of a new office, a foyer, a new bathroom, pantry and a 22 square -foot front porch. The height of the existing house is approximately 17'-5" and the height of the proposed addition will increase it to 18'-2", measured from the finished grade to the highest point *of the roofline. The existing residence has a rear setback of 28-4" (measured from the rear of the house to the rear of the buildable pad/top of slope) and a front setback of 20 feet'. The side setbacks are 5'-8" on one side, and 13'-8" on the other. The proposed addition will not change the distances to adjacent structures to the north of 19'-11" and to the south of 19'-4" (where 15 feet is required). Site and Grading Configuration: The one-story addition will be added at the front of the existing home, entirely within the envelope of the buildable pad. As such, minimal grading is required to accommodate footings and foundation of the new addition. Architectural Features, Colors, and Materials: The architecture of the existing residence is typical of the late 1970s tract vernacular with textured stucco and wood siding on exterior walls, and a gabled roof with flat asphalt shingle tiles. The existing chimney at the front elevation will be removed entirely. The proposed design will maintain architectural integrity by incorporating I Front setback measurement for all parcels within Tract 32974 begin within the public right-of-way, six (6) feet behind curb face. Development Review No. PL 2015-464 Page 3 of 6 Existing Proposed Total Total Living Area 1,752 s.f. 464 s.f. 2,216 s.f. Total Garage Area 457 s.f. 0 s.f.. 457 s.f. Total Porch/Patio/Balcony Area 458 s.f. 22 s.f. 480 s.f. TOTAL FLOOR AREA 3,153 s.f The existing one-story home consists of common areas (family room, game room, dining room, and kitchen), and private areas consisting of three bedrooms and two bathrooms. The new addition will be added to the front of the home. The floor area will be modified to allow for the creation of a new office, a foyer, a new bathroom, pantry and a 22 square -foot front porch. The height of the existing house is approximately 17'-5" and the height of the proposed addition will increase it to 18'-2", measured from the finished grade to the highest point *of the roofline. The existing residence has a rear setback of 28-4" (measured from the rear of the house to the rear of the buildable pad/top of slope) and a front setback of 20 feet'. The side setbacks are 5'-8" on one side, and 13'-8" on the other. The proposed addition will not change the distances to adjacent structures to the north of 19'-11" and to the south of 19'-4" (where 15 feet is required). Site and Grading Configuration: The one-story addition will be added at the front of the existing home, entirely within the envelope of the buildable pad. As such, minimal grading is required to accommodate footings and foundation of the new addition. Architectural Features, Colors, and Materials: The architecture of the existing residence is typical of the late 1970s tract vernacular with textured stucco and wood siding on exterior walls, and a gabled roof with flat asphalt shingle tiles. The existing chimney at the front elevation will be removed entirely. The proposed design will maintain architectural integrity by incorporating I Front setback measurement for all parcels within Tract 32974 begin within the public right-of-way, six (6) feet behind curb face. Development Review No. PL 2015-464 Page 3 of 6 matching exterior colors and building materials. The applicant will be adding contemporary elements to the front, such as stacked stone veneer and incorporation of a more prominent front entry. The roof of the proposed addition will match the home's existing 4:12 gabled roof pitch. The proposed addition retains the mass and scale of the existing house. Existing Front Elevation SCOPE OF WORK The proposed project requires a land use approval through the Development Review (DR) process. The analysis that follows provides the basis for staff's recommendation to approve the DR application. ,111 11��11 W 1 31 1`111 b 1:70"1• Additions to structures which involves a.substantial change or intensification of land use (i.e., changes to structures visible from the street) require Planning Commission approval of a DR application. Development Review approval is required to ensure compliance with the City's Development Review No. PL 2015-464 Page 4 of 6 General Plan policies, development standards, and design guidelines, and to minimize adverse effects of the proposed project upon the surrounding properties and the City in general. As stated in Section 22.48.010 of the Development Code, the Development Review process was established to ensure that new development and additions to existing development are consistent with the General Plan "through the promotion of high functional and aesthetic standards to complement and add to the economic, physical, and social character" of Diamond Bar. Development Standards: The following table compares the proposed project with the City's development standards for residential development in the RL zone: - ---------- NUM110 , T EMIR I 2,21111 M -it," on one side and side 6-13" — N side -0- on the other side 19'-11 N side 19'-11 N side 19'-4" — S side 19'-4" — S side IN �` �ReS tback �� -:�- � �, : �,��Buil@ W H11,76fiffi— Plt�z- VN1 INM *WX Max !i"r � 41111 2 -car garage 2 -car garage *Measured six (6) feet behind face of curb. Landscaping: Landscape plans are not required because the site is already developed, and because the project is exempt from the City's Water Efficient Landscaping Ordinance. The ordinance would only apply if new or rehabilitated landscaping of 2,500 square feet or less was being installed or altered. A portion of the front lawn will be removed to accommodate for the addition and complies with the minimum landscape area of 50 percent of the front yard area requirement. However, landscaping that is damaged during construction will need to be restored upon project completion. This requirement is included as a condition of approval. The proposed project complies with the goals and objectives as set forth in the adopted General Plan in terms of land use and density. The project is designed to be compatible with and enhance the character of the existing homes in the neighborhood. The addition to the front of the home will generally be maintained in the same architectural style of the existing house, while adding a few contemporary elements, such as stacked stone veneer and the addition of a more prominent front entry. The proposed addition at the front of the home will have windows on the east elevation, adjacent to an existing single-family residence. However, the addition is adjacent to the neighbor's windowless garage. As such, the project will maintain privacy views looking to/from adjacent properties and will be visually integrated into the existing home and not negatively impact the look and character of the neighborhood. Development Review No. PL 2015-464 Page 5 of 6 The project incorporates the principles of the City's Residential Design Guidelines as follows: A gradual transition between the addition and existing residence is achieved through appropriate setbacks, building height, landscaping, and window and door placement; Elevations are treated with detailed architectural elements; Roof lines are representative of the design and scale of the structure through vertical and horizontal articulations; ® Placement and relationship of windows, doors, and other window openings are carefully integrated with the building's overall design; ® The addition is visually integrated with the primary structure, by utilizing similar colors and materials throughout the proposed addition; ® Roof type, pitch and materials of the addition match the primary structure; and a Large wall expanses without windows or doors are avoided. The Public Works Department and Building and Safety Division reviewed this project, and their comments are included in the attached resolution as conditions of approval. On January 11, 2016, public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 1,000 -foot radius of the project site. On January 15, 2016, the notice was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers. A notice display board was posted at the site, and a copy of the notice was posted at the City's three designated community posting sites. Public Comments Received No comments have been received as of the publication date of this report. This project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on that assessment, the City has determined the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to the provisions of Article 19 Section 15301(e) (additions to existing structures) of the CEQA Guidelines. No further environmental review is required. M I Mayuko NaVa rim—a Associate Planner Attachments: 1. Draft Resolution No. 2016 -XX and Standard Conditions of Approval 2. Site Plan, Floor Plans, and Elevations Development Review No. PL 2015-464 Page 6 of 6 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2016 -XX A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. PL2015-464 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A ONE-STORY ADDITION CONSISTING OF 464 SQUARE FEET OF FLOOR AREA TO AN EXISTING 1,752 SQUARE -FOOT, ONE-STORY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH AN ATTACHED 457 SQUARE -FOOT, TWO -CAR GARAGE ON A 0.54 GROSS ACRE (23,590 SQUARE -FOOT) LOT AT 21458 COLD SPRING LANE, DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 (APN 8714-001-012).- A. , RECITALS The applicant, Jason Sun, has filed an application for Development Review No. PL2015-464 to construct a one-story addition consisting of 464 square feet of floor area to an existing 1,752 square -foot, one-story single-family residence with an attached 457 square -foot, two -car garage located at 21458 Cold Spring Lane, Diamond Bar, County of Los Angeles, California. 2. The following approVal is requested from the Planning Commission: (a) Development Review to construct a one-story addition consisting of 464 square feet of floor area. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review shall be referred to as the "Proposed Project." 3. The subject property is made up of one parcel totaling 23,590 gross square feet (0.54 gross acres). It is located in the Low Density Residential (RL) zone with an underlying General Plan land use designation of Low Density Residential. 4. The legal description of the subject property is Lot 19 of Tract 32974. The Assessor's Parcel Number is 8714-001-012. 5. On January 11, 2016, public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 1,000 -foot radius of the Project site. On January 15, 2016, notification of the public hearing for this project was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers. In addition to the published and mailed notices, the project site was posted with a public hearing notice on a display board, and the notice was posted at the City's three designated locations. 6. On January 26,, 2016, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing, solicited testimony from all interested individuals, and concluded said hearing on that date. NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resol.ution are true and correct; and 2. The Planning Commission hereby determines the Project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to the provisions of Article 19, Section 15301 (e) (additions to existing structures) of the CEQA Guidelines. Therefore, no further environmental review is required. C. FINDINGS OF FACT Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein and as prescribed under Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Sections 22.48, this Planning Commission hereby finds as follows: Development Review Findings (DBMC Section 22.48.040) The design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with the applicable elements of the City's General Plan, City Design Guidelines, and development standards of the applicable district, design guidelines, and architectural criteria for special areas (e.g., theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards or planned developments). The design and layout of the proposed one-story addition consisting of 464 square feet of floor area to the existing one-story single-family residence is consistent with the City's General Plan, City Design Guidelines and development standards. -The one-story addition will be added at the front of the existing home. The proposed design will maintain architectural integrity by incorporating matching exterior colors and building materials. The roof of the proposed addition will match the existing 4:12 gabled roof pitch. The mass and scale of the addition to the front of the home are proportionate to the existing house. The project site is not part of any theme area, specific plan, community plan, boulevard or planned development. 2 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016 -XX 2. The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. The proposed additi6n will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments because the use of the project site is designed for a single-family home and the surrounding uses are also single-family homes. In addition, no protected trees exist on site. The proposed addition will not interfere with vehicular or pedestrian movements, Such as access or other functional requirements of a single- family home because it complies with the requirements for driveway widths and is a continuation of an existing use. 3. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain and enhance the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22.48: Development Review Standards, the City's Design Guidelines, the City's General Plan, or any applicable specific plan. The architecture of the existing residence is a late 1970s tract design with textured stucco and wood siding on exterior walls, and a gabled roof with flat asphalt shingle tiles. The existing chimney at the front elevation will be removed entirely. The proposed design will maintain architectural integrity by incorporating matching exterior colors and building materials. The applicant will be adding a few modem elements to the front such as stacked stone veneer and incorporation of a more prominent front entry. The roof of the proposed addition will match the existing 4:12 gabled roof pitch. The mass and scale of the addition at the front of the home are proportionate to the existing house. The proposed 464 square -foot addition at the front of the home will have windows on the east elevation, adjacent to an existing single-family residence. -However, the addition is adjacent to the neighbor's garage that is not considered habitable living area. In addition, the garage does not have any windows. The project will maintain privacy views looking to/from adjacent properties. Therefore, the addition will be visually integrated into the existing home and not negatively impact the look and character of the neighborhood. 4. The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, color, and will remain aesthetically appealing. 3 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016 -XX The architecture of the existing residence is a late 1970s tract design with textured stucco and wood siding on exterior walls, and a gabled roof with flat asphalt shingle tiles. The existing chimney at the front elevation will be removed entirely. The proposed design will maintain architectural integrity by incorporating matching exterior colors and building materials. The applicant will be adding a few modem elements to the front such as stacked stone veneer and incorporation of a more prominent front entry. The roof of the proposed addition will match the existing 4:12 gabled roof pitch. The mass and scale of the addition at the front elevation of the home are proportionate to the existing house. 5. The proposed development will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious (e.g., negative effect on property values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Before the issuance of any City permits, the proposed project is required to comply with all conditions within the approved resolution, and the Building and Safety Division and Public Works Departments requirements. Through the permit and inspection process, the referenced agencies will ensure that the proposed project is not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. 6. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as set forth under Article 19 Section 15301(e) (additions to existing structures) of the CEQA guidelines. Based upon the findings and conclusion set forth above, the Planning Commission hereby approves this Application, subject to the following conditions: Development shall substantially comply with the plans and documents presented to the Planning Commission at the public hearing. 2. Standard Conditions. The applicant shall comply with the standard development conditions attached hereto. The Planning Commission shall: a. Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and b. Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail to the property owner and applicant, Adam' Hui Gu, 21458 Cold Spring Lane, Diamond Bar, CA 91765. 4 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016 -XX APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26th DAY OF JANUARY 2016, BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. 13 Jennifer Mahlke, Vice Chairperson 1, Greg Gubman, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of January, 2016, by the following vote: M - AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: ABSTAIN: Commissioners: Greg Gubman, Community Development Director 5 Planning Commission Resolution No, 2016 -XX COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT J1. USE PERMITS, COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL NEW AND REMODELED STRUCTURES PROJECT #: Development Review No. PL 2015-464 SUBJECT: To construct a one-story addition consisting of 464 square feet of floor area to an existing 1,752 square -foot, one-story single- family residence with an attached 467 square -foot, two -car garage. PROPERTY Adam Hui Gu OWNER: 21458 Cold Spring Lane Diamond Bar, CA 91765 APPLICANT: Jason Sun 2275 Huntington -Drive #347 San Marino, CA 91108 LOCATION: 21458 Cold Spring Lane, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION AT (909) 839-7030, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: The applicant shall defe)nd, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, and its officers, agents and employees, from any claim, action, or proceeding to attack, set-aside, void or annul, the approval of Development Review No. PL2015-464 brought within the time period provided by Government Code Section 66499.37. In the event the city and/or its officers, agents and employees are made a party of any such action: 6 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016 -XX (a) Applicant shall provide a defense to the City defendants or at the City's option reimburse the City its costs of defense, including reasonable attorneys fees, incurred in defense of such claims. (b) Applicant shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against the City defendants. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action of proceeding, and shall cooperate fully in the defense thereof. 2. This approval shall not be effective for any purpose until the applicant and owner of the property involved have filed, within twenty-one (21) days of approval of this Development Review No. PL2015-464, at the City of Diamond Bar Community Development Department, their affidavit stating that they are aware of and agree to accept all the conditions of this approval. Further, this approval shall not be effective until the applicants pay remaining City processing fees, school fees and fees for the review of submitted reports. 3. All designers, architects, engineers, and contractors associated with this project shall obtain a Diamond Bar Business License; and a zoning approval for those businesses located in Diamond Bar. 4. Signed copies of Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016 -XX, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 5. Prior to the plan check, revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval. 6. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced , thereon, all conditions of approval shall be completed. 7. The project site shall be maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of approval and all laws, or other applicable regulations. 8. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and any applicable Specific Plan in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 9. All site, grading, landscape/irrigation, and roof plans, and elevation plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of City permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc,,) or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 7 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016 -XX a �01 X 10. The property owner/applicant shall remove the public hearing notice board within three days of this project's approval. 11. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of City Planning, Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works Department, and the Fire Department. FEES/DEPOSITS Applicant shall pay development fees (including but not limited to Planning, Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works Department and Mitigation Monitoring) at the established rates, prior to issuance of building or grading permit (whichever comes first), as required by the City. School fees as required shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permit. In addition, the applicant shall pay all remaining prorated City project review and processing fees prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever comes first. 2. Prior to any plan check, all deposit accounts for the processing of this project shall have no deficits. 1111HY3101IN111116i The approval of Development Review No. PL2015-464 expires within two years from the date of approval if the use has not been exercised as defined pursuant to Diamond 'Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Section 22.66.050(b)(1). In accordance with DBMC Section 22.60.050(c), the applicant may request, in writing; a - one-year time extension for Planning Commission consideration. Such ' a request must be submitted to the Planning Division prior to the expiration date and be accompanied by the review fee in accordance with the Fee Schedule in effect at the time of submittal. SITE DEVELOPMENT This approval is to construct a 464 square -foot, one-story addition to an existing one-story home located at 21458 Cold Spring Lane, as described in the staff report and depicted on the approved plans on file with the Planning Division, subject to the conditions listed herein. 2. The construction documents submitted for plan check shall be in substantial compliance with the architectural plans approved by the Planning Commission, as modified pursuant to the conditions below. If the plan check submittal is not in substantial compliance with the approved Development Review submittal, the plans may require further staff review and re -notification of the surrounding property owners, which may delay the project and entail additional fees. .91 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016 -XX 3. To ensure compliance with the provisions of the Planning Commission approval,- a final inspection is required from the Planning Division when work for any phase of the project has.been completed. The applicant shall inform the Planning Division and schedule an appointment for such an inspection. 4. The above conditions shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all future owners, operators, or successors thereto of the property. Non- compliance with any condition of approval or mitigation measure imposed as a condition of the approval shall constitute a violation of the City's Development Code. Violations may be enforced in accordance with the provisions of the Development Code, 5. Failure to comply with any of the conditions set forth above or as subsequently amended in writing by. the City, may result in failure to obtain a building final and/or a certificate of occupancy until full compliance is reached. The City's requirement for full compliance may require minor corrections and/or complete demolition of a non-compliant improvement, regardless of costs incurred where the project does not comply with design requirements and approvals that the applicant agreed to when permits were pulled to construct the project. 6. The project site shall be developed and. maintained in substantial conformance with the approved plans submitted to, approved, and amended herein by the Planning Commission, collectively 'attached referenced as site plans, floor plans, architectural elevations, and landscape plans on file with the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 7. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, air conditioning condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berms, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Division. S. All roof -mounted equipment shall be screened from public view. 9. All structures, including walls, trash enclosures, canopies, etc., shall be maintained in a structurally sound, safe manner with a clean, orderly appearance. All graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours by the property owners/occupant. 10. All landscaping, structures, architectural features and public improvements damaged during construction shall be repaired or replaced upon project completion. 9 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016 -XX E. SOLID WASTE The site shall be maintained in a condition, which is free of debris both during and after the construction, addition, or implementation of the entitlement approved herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether during or subsequent to construction shall be done only by the property owner, applicant or by a duly permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste from residential, commercial, construction, and industrial areas within the City. It shall be the applicant's obligation to insure that the waste contractor used has obtained permits from the City of Diamond Bar to provide such services. 2. Mandatory solid waste disposal services shall be provided by the City franchised waste hauler to all parcels/lots or uses affected by approval, of this project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, (909) 839-7040, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. ' GENERAL Prior to an Erosion Control Plan shall be submitted concurrently with the grading plan clearly detailing erosion control measures. These measures shall be implemented during construction. The erosion control plan shall conform to national Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards and incorporate the appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP's) as specified in the Storm Water BMP Certification. 2. Grading and construction activities and the transportation of equipment and materials and operation of heavy grading equipment shall be limited to between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. Dust generated by grading and construction activities shall be reduced by watering the soil prior to and during the activities and in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 402 and Rule 403. Reclaimed water shall be used whenever possible. Additionally, all construction equipment shall be properly muffled to reduce noise levels. Detailed drainage system information of the lot with careful attention to any flood hazard area shall be submitted. All drainage/runoff from the development shall be conveyed from the site to the natural drainage course. No on-site drainage shall be conveyed to adjacent parcels, unless that is the natural drainage course. 10 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016 -XX APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 839- 7020, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. GENERAL CONDITIONS: At the time of plan check submittal, plans and construction shall conform to current State and Local Building Code (i.e. 2013 California Building Code series will apply) requirements and all other applicable construction codes, ordinances and regulations in effect. 2. Provisions for CALGreen shall be implemented onto plans and certification shall be provided by a third party as required by the Building Division. Specific water, waste, low VOC, and related conservation measures shall be shown on plans. Construction shall conform to the current CALGreen Code. 3. The minimum design load for wind in this area is 110 M.P.H. exposures "C" and the site is within seismic zone D or E. The applicant shall submit drawings and calculations prepared by a California State licensed Architect/Engineer with wet stamp and signature. 4. This project shall comply with the energy conservation requirements of the State of California Energy Commission. All lighting shall be high efficacy or equivalent per the current California Energy Code 119 and 150(k). 5. A, drainage plan shall direct water away from building structures and property lines. 6. The existing laundry room exhaust duct shall not exceed manufacturer's specifications in length and bends. The duct route shall be shown on plans. 7. Solid waste management of construction material shall incorporate recycling material collection per Diamond Bar Municipal Code 8.16 of Title R. The contractor shall complete all required forms and pay applicable deposits prior to permit. 8. AQMD notification is required at least 10 days prior to any demolition. Proof of notification is required at permit issuance. 9. All workers on the job shall be covered by workman's compensation insurance under a licensed general contractor. Any changes to the contractor shall be updated on the building permit. 11 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016 -XX CONSTRUCTION — CONDITIONS REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION: 10. Prior to framing inspection, modification of the existing fire sprinkler system, if applicable, shall be approved by the Los Angeles County Fire Department. 11. Every permit issued by the building official under the provisions of this Code shall expire and become null and void unless the work authorized by such permit is commenced within one -hundred -eighty (180) days after permit issuance, and if a successful inspection has not been obtained from the building official within one -hundred -eighty (180) days from the date of permit issuance or the last successful inspection. A successful inspection shall mean a documented passed inspection by the city building inspector as outlined in Section 110.6. 12. The project shall be protected by a construction fence to the satisfaction of the Building Official, and shall comply with the NPDES & BMP requirements (sand bags, etc.). All fencing shall be. view obstructing with opaque surfaces. - 13. All structures and property shall be maintained in a safe and clean manner during construction. The property shall be free of debris, trash, and weeds. 14. All equipment staging areas shall be maintained in an orderly manner and screened behind a minimum 6' high fence. 15. All doors shall open to a landing that is, at most Y2" when doors swing over the landing. 16. An occupancy separation shall be provided between the existing garage and new addition area. 17. The applicant shall contact Dig Alert and have underground utility locations marked by the utility companies prior to any excavation. Contact Dig Alert by dialing 811 or their website at www.digalert.org. 18. The applicant shall first request and secure approval from the City for any changes or deviations from approved plans prior to proceeding with any work in accordance with such changes or deviations. 19. All glazing in hazardous locations shall be labeled as safety glass. The labeling shall be visible for inspection. 20. Pursuant to California Residential Code (CRC) Section R315, carbon monoxide detectors are required in halls leading to sleeping rooms. 12 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016 -XX 21. Drainage patterns shall match the approved grading/drainage plan from the Public Works/Engineering Department. Surface water shall drain away from the building at a 2% minimum slope. The final as -built conditions shall match the grading/drainage plan or otherwise approved as -built grading/drainage plan. 22. Special inspections and structural observation will be required in conformance with CBC 1704 to 1709. 23. All plumbing fixtures, including those in existing areas, shall be low -flow models consistent with California Civil Code Section 1101.1 to 1101.8. MIA 13 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016 -XX NOT&5: 1. ALL (E) TREE AND LANDSCAPE AR&4 AT REAR AND SIDE YARD TO REAWN A A Area HHC HT AHC Aggregate Base Course HDR AC Acoustic H94 FbllHeel�hw•e Header Honor Metal HOUSE A D D I T I O �l ' 2. NO 0410 ADJ Adjacent NOR Hort—tai TREE ON PROPERTY \ fZZT)' MT Above Flml had Floor HVAC AIA American Institute of ArcHucts I IF A mance I "att}}ppNentR19411, Com9tbNrq Hanerlt of Inerth - I�s�,des e t ADDRESS: N. S'z8' AAL LLOW ARE" AspWtect, oncretetu °' K JR ASP Aspinitic Concrete K ,R Junior Joint 21458 COLD SPRING LN, DIAMOND BAR CA 91765 ' GG Average LAV gle L Lavatory 1 7 • I? At LB LIN FT Lag Bolt Linear Foot/Feet ' RESTRICTED USE AREA R•". HALO Balcony LL BLDG Bu0.rBn8 LVC Uve Load U ht Vel ht Concrete, D H OWNER: IRtluTECAMAL 13,950 HHl Benner M H HAT [ Channel HaterI Moment Material ADAM H U I G U 8c Z N I JUN M 0 P1AIwwc ARCHITECT SUNS, INC. [INC. • W W W . •` ` " " W "WWW .. .. .. W W W W �. W W v, W ` ` ` ` " •` " " W v(E �DS•C4PE•ATI. " r' W C MB CAST Cabinet KFG LER Ceramic TECH CJ Ce JoLst NET Machine Dott HemFectusr/HanuFacbrbg Mechanical Hetat 2275 181Ni91GRIN DR., /347 Sul MAKING. rA 91108 (678)794-Ia . W W w W W W W r W W W W +' CIL Cents HIS wsce CL Center Line KTL Wscellaneous 1 PROJECT TITLE +• + +• + + +• +• +• +• r- +• +• r• + W CLD Closet N NO Cut Ctenr Natural Grade ADDRESS: 21458 COLD SPRING LN, DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 +• >rtx-assYurr v + +• v. NIC Not In Contract CO used Opening nip Number y CLS. Column NTS an Conbhatlon 0 m Not To Scale over ASSESSOR'S NO: 8714-001-012, TRS=32974 LOT 19 '•^C` CONC Concrete DC " OG can On Center Dn Grade ZONE: RL - W W CONCONT Fn7ous OFF DPP D OD'ID. DBL Douhle PASS DFfIce Opposite Passenger LOT AREA: 13,850 S.F. ,ey, r• X+e W p DEPT Depnrtnent FEE Portland Cement tannate FLOOR AREA: (E) LIVING FLOOR AREA 1,752 S.F. C-D (E)CONC. Stag w DF Drinking Faun In Q pLAS ptasterUD W W+• W ��qny DL Dead Load pL GL Bill a n PL Pinta Gross Property Une - - (N) HOUSE ADDITION 464 S.F. rn + W I WV Division FLY PLY Plyrood (E)lox " h DN Dom PREFAB BS Dom Sport Prefabricated N TOTAL LIVING AREA () 2,216 S.F. CJ o W " R DvG Droning RA Re<�P n Air (E) 2-CAR GARAGE 457 S.F. a W W I (E)CONC. SCAB J2; W I E FA Each REC EDF Electric Drinking Fountain RD Rec•enilon RooF Drain (E) COVERED BACK PORCH 458 S.F. m z E1.EC Elevations REG Reglster (N) FRONT PORCH 22 S.F. Z z N +� + EJ � on Joint REO'sFp Required}'° TOTAL LIVING AREA MAX REQUIRED = 20% X 13,850 = 2,770 > 2,216 Q � a 3y s � i EEdpsvtine"t RJB Roar jolt LOT COVERAGE: MAX. REQUIRED = 4,800 F— o 0 a RR EXT Exterior RR Roam Roof Rafter 4,800 > 3,153 Z Q 13 8 19 - 0. FD Floor Drain S F S FF Finish Floor SA Section Kodules Su ply Alm 3,153 13,850 =2277 / row a FG 'Flnlsh Grade SC FH Fire Hydrant SCH Solid Core Schedule FAR: 2,216 / 13,850 W W,� <.. u FHC Fo-e Hose Cabinet SEP SL separate Score Llne PARKING: 2-CAR GARAGE 0- e FHR Fire Hase Rack FJ Floor Joist S14T SIH Sheet War SET BACK: SEE SITE PLAN W to = i + FL floor FLG Flooring SPEC FLUOR Fluorescent Specification BUILDING HEIGHT: ONE STORY, HEIGHT 17'-5' 6 z o W •,z tl ` FDC Face of Concrete STD FON Foce of Hasonry STRX FDS Foce Stud Standard structural CONSTRUCTION TYPE: TYPE V-B, SPRINKLERED z V co a of Face f W ll (Finish) SUPT Superhrter"I" OCCUPANCY: R-3 / U _ N Q W W I'D SUPV a SSYS SupervLsar I VAT Vint Asbestos Th U y VCT Vhyt Conp.Mtlon TBe CODE 2013 CRC, CBC, CMC, CPC, CEC, CGBC = L3 WN r• 14 FS Floor snk FT Foot or Feet T TL den Top Of Ga^b V VERT Vertical ALONG WITH THE 2013 T-24 ENERGY STANDARDS ut 9 o E)CONC FTG Footing TG Tap Of Grade W V/ vith FX Flre Extinguisher T 6 G lounge and Groove V/D -without 2 SLAB FXC Fire Exthgulsher Cabinet TDP Top of Porephet X VC Vater Closet o T •. 5'-8' n CA G TEL V GYP HD Gypsum Hoard TEMP GEN Genernt THK Telephone Tergered THck WDDNl{ yVlood ypy window ' q (E)1-STORY HOUSE k� N4 GC Gemara ContrActor THRU (GOVT Th—Gh Z W Wrdt t Iron VP Voridng Point 2 (E)CONC. SLAB 1.7� TV lass Government UP Top Of Val Typical VR Vater Resistant VT Weight wI 9 ABBREVIATIONS 2 PROJECT SUMMARY WA'I mF ARCHITECTURAL � 5'-8' 15'-6' y — NEW WALL, 2X SND W/ 1/2' GWB INTERIOR e 7/8' STUCCO EXTERIOR TO TITLE / INDEX / CONSULTANTS / SUMMARYExlsnec wALL To REMAIN SCOPE OF WORK / GENERAL / ABBREVIATIONS f'' t LEGEND / SITE PLAN 21-7' C'i EXISTING CONSTRUCTION TO BE REMOVED a F J" _ .rr +i A-1 EXISTING FLOOR PLAN/ ROOF PLAN A-2 PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN/ ROOF PLAN (E)2-CAR GARAGE 457S F.SPACE &U. ,.••mm - L:` A-3 EXISTING BUILDING ELEVATIONS A-4 PROPOSED BUILDING ELEVATIONS IDENRFlCARON ,r" �`.(E)CONC. S(AB •-3 10'-O• APARTMENT NUMBER 2i'-T- M — PLAN TYPE ; ' PROJECT NO :15208 LIVING RM — ROOM NAME r • ""'^i' -x DRAWING TITLE �Ia — CEIUNG HEIGHT 1, WINDOW IOENRFICARON " • x'..r ay ON P0" w Q Doan 4 PROJECT TITLE WINDOW f v PROJECT SUMMARY REFERENCES MAPS SITE PL/AN INDEX BLDG. SECTION NUMBER 91EET WHERE SECTION IS C. ABBREAVIATIONS al N �, •�• W v, �, �, (E)—DSiAPE AREIY r• . s L`( ®i CONSULTANTS O l y' 1T — R- 1`566 W PROPERTY UNE 73' ' V + o �? I-If W MATERIAL LEGEND NUMBER LEGEND ON SAME SHEET I p 1-I-- — STRUCTURAL GRID LINES \�� PREPARED BY: CH 6 VICINITY MAP 3 INDEX OF DRAWINGS SSUE DATE: b `•••e• W W. W INiEAIOR EIEVARON SHEET NUMBER AB 2 _— •••' `— INTERIORID"ARONKEYLETtER 9/1/15 ro — — REVISIDN NUMBER 1. (N) OFFICE ADDITION � U, GRADE REFERENCE PROJECT ARCHITECT ARCHITECT SUNS, INC. 2. (N) BATH #2 ADDITION 3. N PANTRY ADDITION 464 S.F. ( ) 0 Ra rum u u fRONiYfJ01f'mn,.w- _ Za m .1,.5a sr. gees' — EwsnNc coxiWR 2275 HUNTINGTON DR. 347, SAN MARINO, CA 91108 626 284-4009 ) 4. (N) FOYER ADDITION COLD SPRING LN ry -.----too/ — NEW /OR FlNISH CONTOUR -tp0 (,01.50 EXISTING GRADE — 5. (N) COVERED FRONT PORCH: 22 S.F. 6. RELOCATE WASHER AND DRYER ®(E)LAUNDRY T N Am FINISH GRADE — — WORKING , CONTROL /OR DATUM POINT — PROPERTY UNE 0 10 SITE PLAN / LANDSCAPE PLAN 8 ARCHITECTURAL LEGEND 7 CONSULTANTS 4 SCOPE OF WORK r ,/ 0 PC E)ROOF PLAN I SCALE "1,1(E)FLOOR _ PLAN 2a ARCHITECT SUN! W5 monm UL I MH MARK CA mine in rn U m c - CL_ in V) c> C-) 00 gCDU) = C-4 PROJECT NC 010110110 DRAWING TIl EXISTING ROOF PLAN/ FLOOR PLAN PREPAREDI SSUE DATE: A N 0� SCALE NO 7E - ALL NEW ROOF FASCIA BOARD TO MATCH WITH (E) 2X8 ROOF FASCIA BOARD PAINTED (N)ROOF PLAN SCOPE OF WORK -=1 N ScaLE (E)M.BATH DR (E)M.BED 15'-5"X15'-31 ROOM 0 M (E)BEDROOM #2 #2 12'-6"XlO'-Cr y Ul co (E 32XBO (4E) GO 32xao (E) 32" 7(N)FOYER . X2T Ir(N oaO CE i r -I "T #1 (E)BEDROOM #1 CL cn Ul) c' xjo�O 2 _O (D r 13OQ 3'– i�' STOR (E)2—CAR GARAGE 20'-0"X21'-1' (E)DINNING 91-11*x10,—B* (E)COVERED PORCH 458 S.F. (E)FAMILY 23'—I0*X9'—B* 0 (E)KITCHEN FR7EF (E)GAME ROOM 13'-1'X15'-6" XW-6- ,11-(N)FLOOR PLAN RAW= Kmm kRCHITECT SUNS, INC. 2M m WMARKS MCA mos IIHOL32M-40 CD Ul co )FO E y GO < 25. 7(N)FOYER . X2T Ir(N oaO CE i r -I cr- CL cn Ul) c' (D r 13OQ 3'– C-1 � A ® 3(2X80 (N) BATH#2 0 -D"XB!-2• (N)30X42 SH (N)M60 SW WALL LEGEND . . ......... (N)FRONT PORCHSCOPE OF WORK — VWW L 2X SIUDM08W/1/2' GYP. 80. IWERIOR 71Sr= M — DOM WAIL TO REWIN — DUSM CUMCM TO BE REMOVED I 4 ,11-(N)FLOOR PLAN RAW= Kmm kRCHITECT SUNS, INC. 2M m WMARKS MCA mos IIHOL32M-40 PROJECT NO :15208 DRAWING -11TLE PROPOSED ROOF PLAN / PIAN N PREPARED BY. CH N <7� A �10 2 TSCALE — CD Ul co co GO < 25. 5 i r -I cr- CL cn Ul) c' (D =N C-1 � A PROJECT NO :15208 DRAWING -11TLE PROPOSED ROOF PLAN / PIAN N PREPARED BY. CH N <7� A �10 2 TSCALE — Altan== FLMM ARCHITECT SUNS, INC. sew a ��mR�"e�per� ;I 111111 11 IT 11 111111 11 IT 11 111111 111111 1111 11 11 1111 111111 111111 11 IT 11 11 IT 11 1 n m = 11 1 �¢ 1=_ o < U _ . CL Q o ^Wo OGO G .. Q ~U TT�S _I_ N � ., r mommilmoolm Y,6 hi... i ^ OD I EE I - - - =❑❑oo❑o❑❑LIM ❑o❑o❑oa ❑oo❑o❑o❑ - (E)NORTH ELEVATION 1 (E)SOUTH ELEVATION SC"`£ ,/M;`_D. .. 0 ,I M ro 4(a FT—1 \I4 4- .i 0 (E)EAST ELEVATION n 0 � 4V ® �J4 o � o J m (E)WEST ELEVATION Altan== FLMM ARCHITECT SUNS, INC. sew a ��mR�"e�per� ;I PROJECT NO :15208 DRAWING TITLE EXISTING BUILDING ELEVATIONS PREPARED BY: CH NEEMEMEMEM 5SUE, DATE: 9/l/15 m = �¢ 1=_ o < U _ . CL Q o ^Wo OGO G .. Q ~U TT�S _I_ N � ., r mommilmoolm PROJECT NO :15208 DRAWING TITLE EXISTING BUILDING ELEVATIONS PREPARED BY: CH NEEMEMEMEM 5SUE, DATE: 9/l/15 ARCHITECT SUNS, sewu CA 01105 ( PROJECT NO :T; DRAWING TITLE NEW BUILDING ELEVATIONS PREPARED BY: 11 If 11 11 11 1 -n-TFTT-n--R LjI 1111TIl I IIITII Ilifil 1111 11 111111111111 1111111 I, - JIT1.1 IIII'l 11 1111 1111111 I -I I I -IT -111 -000❑o❑o❑ IIII Jill] 1 11:1 [lull 111 IL IIITI I IIITII I IIITI ill IIII'll III Hill 1111 11 11 1 11 IITII III I 1 I Hill I 1 111111 11 IT -11111 '1 Fill 111] 1111 111 1 1 1 1 1-11IT11 11 111111 11 IT 11 11 11 fill I 144T 444- 11111111111 H 11 111111 11 IT 11 111 1111 11 11111 11 Uall Will 11111 E- _:I a❑000 = - - - _=- 1-4 1--- _l - - _ _- - _ _ - - _ - _! -\:SCOPEOFIVORK 2 J(N)NORTH ELEVATION F:�,� 1 (N)SOUTH ELEVATION ELEVATION & SECTION MATERIAL LEGEND ASHINGLE BY 1 M&T 'EUC IMTH 30 YEARS -WEATHMEDWOOD' FIRE RATINGS, COLOR TO MATCH EMSTING. ICC# ESR -1475 2 STUCCO BY 'LA HABRe 504 BLUE GREY TO MATCH DaSTING 4 8 1 I> 3 3 DUAL GLAZED VINYL WINDOW & DOOR TO MATCH E)OSIING,'MILGARD' 4 ROOF EAVE & CORBLE PAINTED WHITE TO MATCH EXISTING 5 R-13 INSULATION EXTERIOR WALL 6 R-36 INSULATION ON ROOF 7 r SLAB ON GRADE 8 (N) STONE VENEER, -FOG SOUTHERN LEDGESTONE- (CSV 2028) BY 'CULTURED STONE' 9 ENTRY DOOR, PAINTED WHITE TO EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURF, PAINTED BLACK ri 1 ALL NEW ROOF FASCIA BOARD TO MATCH V47H (E) 2X8 ROOF FASCIA BOARD PAINTED �—SCOPE OF WORK -)(N)EAST ELEVATION SCALE r 4 I—SCOPE OF WORK 10 A(N)WEST ELEVATION —T r ARCHITECT SUNS, sewu CA 01105 ( PROJECT NO :T; DRAWING TITLE NEW BUILDING ELEVATIONS PREPARED BY: uWamaniamaelial CITY OF DIAMOND BAR - 21810 COPLEY DRIVE - DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 - TEL. (909) 839-7030 - FAX (909) 861-3117 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 7.2 MEETING DATE: January 26, 2016 CASE/FILE NUMBER: Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL2015-98 PROJECT LOCATION: 505 Bellows Ct. Diamond Bar, CA 91765 (APN 8281-035-049) GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential (RL) ZONING DISTRICT: Low Medium Density Residential (RLM) PROPERTY OWNER/ Justin Lee APPLICANT: 505 Bellows Court Diamond Bar, CA 91765 The applicant/property owner is requesting approval of a Development Review (DR) application to construct a 1,249 square-foot,'two-story addition, 298 square -feet of balcony area, and a 63 square -foot porch to an existing 1,555 square -foot, two-story single-family residence with an attached 438 two -car garage on a 0.35 gross lot. A Minor Conditional Use Permit is requested to allow a second -story addition to a nonconforming structure with a preexisting 11 -foot building separation to the house on the adjacent lot to the south (where 15 feet is required). Adopt the attached Re ' solution (Attachment 1) approving Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL2015-98, based on the findings of Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Sections 22.48 and 22.56, subject to conditions. The project site is located on the terminus of the cul-de-sac of Bellows Court, north of Armitos Place. The site was developed in 1987 under Los Angeles County standards with a 1,555 square -foot single family residence and a 438 square -foot garage on a 0.35 gross acre (15,079 square -foot) lot. There are no protected trees on site. The property is legally described as Lot 8 of Tract No. 42587, and the Assessor's Parcel Number (APN) is 8281-035-049. Project Description The proposed first floor addition is located at the rear of the existing residence and the second floor addition is located primarily above the first floor addition. The addition consists of the following components: PROJECT SUMMARY (square footage) Living Area First Floor Existing 700 New 1,189 Total First Floor 1,889 Second Floor Existing 855 New 677 Total Second Floor 1,532 Total Living Area 3,421 Garage Existing 438 New 0 Total Garage Area 438 TOTAL FLOOR AREA 3,859 Balcony/Porch/Patio Areas First Floor Existing 63 New 0 Total First Floor 63 Second Floor Existing 0 New 298 Total Second Floor 298 Total Balcony/Porch/Patio Area 361 The existing two-story home consists of common areas (living room, family room, and kitchen), one bedroom and a bathroom on the first floor. The existing second floor consists of four bedrooms and two bathrooms. The applicant is proposing to remodel the existing first floor to include a bedroom, one bathroom, utility/laundry room, and a large open area that includes an expanded kitchen, nook, family room, TV room, and living room. The second floor remodel and addition include demolishing the three bedrooms to facilitate the construction of two bedrooms with bathrooms and balconies. The applicant is. also proposing a pool in the rear yard and landscaping along the north and south property lines to provide screening and minimize the view to and from the adjacent properties. Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL 2015-98 Page 2 of 9 The height of the existing house is 23'-10" and the height of the proposed addition is 22'-7", measured from the finished grade to the highest point of the roofline. The existing residence has a front setback of 35 feet' and a rear setback of 36-10". The side setbacks are 18'-11" on the north side, and 5 feet on south side. The existing residence has a nonconforming distance separation of 11 feet to the residence on the adjacent lot to the south. By definition, the residence is considered a "nonconforming structure" (DBMC Section 22.68.030). Approval of a Minor Conditional Use Permit is required to allow an expansion of a nonconforming structure if the expansion is greater than 50 percent of the existing square footage of all structures, or if the expansion is not limited to the ground floor. Site and Grading Configuration: The property is an irregularly shaped lot. The existing house is situated on a leveled pad with a descending slope at the rear of the property. The proposed first floor addition is located on an existing leveled pad at the rear and side of the house, and the second story addition will be added above the proposed first floor of the residence. Minimal excavation will be required for footings and foundation placement for the new first floor area. Grading permits are not required for the excavation of the proposed footings and the pool. Architectural Features, Colors, and Materials: The existing residence is 1980s tract design with stucco, river rock, and concrete roof tiles on a gable roof. The applicant is proposing to retain the existing building form, but is introducing contemporary details such as vertical windows, a frosted glass -paned garage door, and steel balcony railings. In addition, the proposed concrete roof tiles will match existing, the existing river rock will be removed, and the entire house will be restuccoed. Existing Front Elevation 1 Front setback measurement for all parcels within Tract 42587 begin six (6) feet behind curb face. Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL 2015-98 Page 3 of 9 Proposed Front Elevation Site and Surrounding General Plan, Zoning and Land Uses The following table describes the surrounding land uses located adjacent to the subject property: Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL 2015-98 Page 4 of 9 Site Aerial � F Project Site PR TMI �, �� ..,✓ � a,;�� -,�..� �`�„�-� ;ter u� r, k_ Panoramic Street View of Project Site Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL 2015-98 Page 5 of 9 Development Review (DBIVIC Chapter 22.48) Additions that substantially change the appearance of an existing residence require Planning Commission approval of a DR application. Development Review approval is required to ensure compliance with the City's General Plan policies, development standards, and design guidelines, and to minimize adverse effects of the proposed project upon the surrounding properties and the City in general. As stated in Section 22.48.010 of the Development Code, the Development Review process was established to ensure that new development and additions to existing development are consistent with the General Plan "through the promotion of high functional and aesthetic standards to complement and add to the economic, physical, and social character" of Diamond Bar. Development Standards: The following table compares the proposed project with the City's development standards for residential development in the RLIVI zone: I me e k Deueiopment� Feature Existing Proposed u: ®ReqWi rdffidntso 01 10'-0", on one side and 18'-1 V– north side 18'-11 north side F -O" on -the other side 5 feet – south side —5 feet – south side 23'-11 "– north side 23'-1 V– north side 11 feet – south side I I feet – south side Lot C:ouerage��Maximum of 40% Building "dig N 2 -car garage man 2 -car garage 2 -car garage Minor Conditional Use Permit is requested to allow the continuation of a nonconforming structure because the addition is greater than 50 percent of the existing home and is not limited to the ground floor. See MCUP discussion on page 7. Landscaping: Landscape plans are not required because the site is already developed, and because the project is exempt from the City's Water Efficient Landscaping Ordinance. A portion of the lawn at the rear and side yards will be removed to accommodate for the addition and the pool. The ordinance would only apply if new or rehabilitated landscaping of 2,500 square feet or less was being installed or altered. However, landscaping that is damaged during construction will need to be restored upon project completion. This requirement is included as a condition of approval. In addition, the applicant is proposing 10 to 12 -foot tall king and queen palm trees and 18 -foot tall giant timber bamboo—a type of "clumping" bamboo which has compact roots and is minimally invasive—along the north and south side property lines to create a visual buffer and screening due to any potential privacy concerns that may arise because of the proposed Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL 2015-98 Page 6 of 9 second story balcony. In addition, the applicant is proposing 15 -foot tall Japanese maple trees and 20 -foot tall Canary Island and cherry trees throughout the property. Minor Conditional Use Permit (DIBIVIC Chapter 22.56) An IVICUP is required if a change or expansion of a nonconforming structure is greater than 50 percent of the existing square footage of all structures on site, or if the addition is not limited to the ground floor or below. Current development standards require a minimum distance of 15 feet between structures on adjacent lots. The existing residence has a nonconforming distance separation of 11 feet between itself and the residence on the adjacent lot to the south. The proposed addition is primarily located at the rear of the house and will comply with all development standards. The City recognizes that homeowners should be allowed to make appropriate improvements to their properties, even if the existing improvements do not fully conform to current development standards. Therefore, the City has established the IVICUP process for such additions, subject to the findings set forth in the Development Code. IVICUPs are normally subject to approval of the City's Hearing Officer (typically the Community Development Director). However, because this IVICUP is being reviewed as part of a DR application, both land use entitlements are subject to review and approval of the Planning Commission. Staff believes that approving the IVICUP as described above is appropriate and compatible with other residences in the neighborhood, based on the following facts and observations: The existing dwelling was built in 1987, prior to the incorporation of the City of Diamond Bar; a The proposed two-story addition complies with all required setbacks; Neighboring properties have nonconforming setbacks, so the proposed project will remain consistent with other homes within the neighborhood. The proposed project complies with the goals and objectives as set forth in the adopted General Plan in terms of land use and density. Two balconies are proposed at the rear of the house. The applicant is proposing trees—such as giant timber bamboo and king and queen palms— along the north and south property lines to provide screening to minimize privacy issues between the proposed balconies and the adjacent properties to the north and south. The applicant will maintain an 18 -foot height for the bamboo and height of 10 to 12 feet for the king and queen palms. In addition, the applicant is proposing frosted glass for the proposed second floor bedroom window to provide additional privacy between the subject property and the property to the south. Based on these observations, staff does not find privacy loss to be a project impact to the neighboring property with the frosted glass for the second floor bedroom window and planting of trees to serve as a visual buffer between the two properties. Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL 2015-98 Page 7 of 9 The project is designed to be compatible with of the existing homes in the neighborhood by maintaining the mass, scale and rhythm of the streetscape. The existing house is a two-story house and the addition is located at the rear of the house. The applicant. is proposing to add contemporary features, such as tall vertical windows, a frosted glass -paned garage door, and steel balcony railings, but will retain the current building form and scale. It is staffs opinion that the addition/remodel is compatible with the scale and character of the neighborhood. The project incorporates the principles of the City's Residential Design Guidelines as follows: e Site Planning: – The proposed addition will conform to all development standards including building height and setbacks, which is consistent with other homes in the neighborhood. – The addition is designed to minimize the negative impacts on surrounding homes. A transition between the project and adjacent properties is achieved through appropriate setbacks. ® Fenestration: – Placement and relationship of windows, doors, and other window openings are carefully integrated with the building's overall design. – Large wall expanses without windows or doors are avoided. – Placement and design of windows were considered to provide privacy between the properties. – The addition is visually integrated with the primary structure, by utilizing similar colors and materials throughout the remodeled fagade and the proposed addition. ® Privacy: – Second story windows facing close neighboring properties are minimized to provide privacy. – Landscaping—such as palm trees and giant timber bamboo—is used to screen areas most sensitive to privacy. Additional Review The Public Works Department and Building and Safety Division reviewed this project, and their comments are included in the attached resolution as conditions of approval. Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL 2015-98 Page 8 of 9 11,11101111 On January 14, 2016, public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 1,000 -foot radius of the project site. On January 15, 2016, the notice was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers. A notice display board was posted at the site, and a copy of the notice was posted at the City's three designated community posting sites. F-* 10TRZ7 16]"k F1 91 A 1, ff �,l J V T'V-_*'J M I This project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on that assessment, the City has determined the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to the provisions of Article 19 Section 15301(e) (additions to existing structures) of the CEQA Guidelines. No further environmental review is required. Prepared by: NataW T. spin cb Assistant Planner Attachments: Reviewed by: C4� Grabe4. Lee' Senior Planner 1. Draft Resolution No. 2016 -XX and Standard Conditions of Approval 2. Color and Materials Board 3. Site Plan, Floor Plans, Elevations Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. Pl. 2015-98 Page 9 of 9 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2016 -XX A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. PL2015-98 TO CONSTRUCT A TWO-STORY ADDITION CONSISTING OF 1,249 SQUARE FEET OF FLOOR AREA AND.361 SQUARE FEET OF PATIO AND BALCONY AREA TO AN EXISTING 1,555 SQUARE -FOOT, TWO-STORY, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH AN ATTACHED 438 SQUARE -FOOT, TWO -CAR GARAGE ON A 0.35 GROSS ACRE (15,079 GROSS SQUARE -FOOT) LOT. A MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT IS REQUESTED TO ALLOW A SECOND -STORY ADDITION TO AN EXISTING NONCONFORMING STRUCTURE WITH AN 11 -FOOT DISTANCE TO THE STRUCTURE ON THE ADJACENT LOT TO THE SOUTH (WHERE 15 FEET IS REQUIRED) LOT AT 505 BELLOWS COURT, DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 (APN 8718-035-049). A. RECITALS The property owner/applicant, Justin Lee, has filed an application for Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL2015-264 application to construct a two-story addition consisting of 1,249 square feet of floor area and 361 square feet of patio and balcony area to an existing 1,555 square -foot, two-story, single- family residence with an attached 438 square -foot, two -car garage located at 505 Bellows Court, Diamond Bar, County of Los Angeles, California. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit shall be referred to as the "Proposed Project." 2. The following approvals are requested from the Planning Commission: (a) Development Review to construct a two-story addition consisting of 1,249 square feet of floor area, 361 square feet of patio and balcony area, and a pool in the rear yard. (b) Minor Conditional Use Permit (MCUP) to allow a second -story addition to a nonconforming structure with a preexisting 11 -foot building separation to the house on the adjacent lot to the south (where 15 feet is required). Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit shall be referred to as the "Proposed Project." 3. The subject property is made up of one parcel totaling 15,079 gross square feet (0.35 gross acres). It is located in the Low Medium Density Residential (RLM) zone with an underlying General Plan land use designation of Low Density Residential. 4. The legal description of the subject property is Lot 8 of Tract No. 42587. The Assessor's Parcel Number is 8718-035-049. 5. On January 14, 2016, public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 1,000 -foot radius of the Project site. On January 15, 2016, notification of the public hearing for this project was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and the Inland Valley DailV Bulletin newspapers; and public notices were posted at the City's designated community posting sites. In addition to the published and mailed notices, the project site was posted with a display board. 6. On January 26, 2016, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing, solicited testimony from all interested individuals, and concluded said hearing on that date. B. RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct; and 2. The Planning Commission hereby determines the Project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to the provisions of Article 19, Section 15301 (e) (additions to existing structures) of the CEQA Guidelines. Therefore, no further environmental review is required. C. FINDINGS OF FACT Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein and as prescribed under Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Sections 22.48 and 22.56, this Planning Commission hereby finds as follows: Development Review Findings (DBMC Section 22.48.040) The design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with the applicable elements of the City's General Plan, City Design Guidelines, and development standards of the applicable district, design guidelines, and architectural criteria for special areas (e.g., theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards or planned developments). The design and layout of the proposed two-story addition consisting of 1, 249 square feet of floor area and 361 square feet of patio and balcony 2 Planning Commission Resolution No, 2016 -XX area to an existing single family residence is consistent with the City's General Plan, City Design Guidelines and development standards by complying with all required setbacks. The first and second floor addition is located at the rear and side of the existing house. The project site is not part of any theme area, specific plan, community plan, boulevard or planned development. 2. The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments-, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. The proposed addition will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments because the use of the project site is designed for a single-family home and the surrounding uses are also single-family homes. Two balconies are proposed at the rear of the house. The applicant is proposing trees—such as giant timber bamboo and king and queen palms—along the north and South property lines to provide screening to minimize privacy issues between the proposed balconies and the adjacent properties to the north and south. The applicant will maintain an 18 -foot height for the bamboo and height of 10 to 12 feet for the king and queen palms. In addition, the applicant is proposing frosted glass for the proposed second floor bedroom window to provide additional privacy between the subject property and the pr6perty to the South. Based on these observations, staff does not find privacy loss to be a project impact to the neighboring property with the frosted glass for the second floor bedroom window and planting of trees to serve as a visual buffer between the two properties. The proposed addition will not interfere with vehicular or pedestrian movements, such as access or other functional requirements of a single- family home because it complies with the requirements for driveway widths and is a continuation of an existing use. 3. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain and enhance the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22.48: Development Review Standards, the City's Design Guidelines, the City's General Plan, or any applicable specific plan. The existing architecture is a 1980s tract home with stucco, river rock, and concrete roof tiles on a gable roof. The applicant is proposing to retain the existing building form, but is introducing contemporary details such as. vertical windows, a frosted glass -paned garage door, and steel balcony railings. In addition, the proposed concrete roof tiles will match existing, the existing river rock will be removed, and the entire house will be restuccoed. 3 Planning Commission Resolution No, 2016 -XX 4. The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, color, and will remain aesthetically appealing. The existing architecture is a 1980s tract home with stucco, river rock, and concrete roof tiles on a gable roof. The applicant is proposing to retain the existing building form, but is introducing contemporary details such as vertical windows, a frosted glass -paned garage door, and steel balcony railings. In addition, the proposed concrete roof tiles will match existing, the existing river rock will be removed, and the entire house will be restuccoed. The two-story addition is located at the rear and side of the existing home. Therefore, the addition will be visually integrated into the existing home and not negatively impact the look and character of the neighborhood. 5. The proposed development will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious (e.g., negative effect on property values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Before the issuance of any City permits, the proposed project is required to comply with all conditions within the approved resolution, and the Building and Safety Division and Public Works Departments requirements. Through the permit and inspection process, the referenced agencies will ensure that the proposed project is not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. 6. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as set forth under Article 19 Section 15301 (e) (additions to existing structures) of the CEQA guidelines. Minor Conditional Use Permit Findings (DBMC Section 22.56.040) The proposed use is allowed within the subject zoning district with the approval of a Minor Conditional Use Permit and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Development Code and the Municipal Code. The existing single-family dwelling is a permitted use in the RLM zone. A Minor Conditional Use Permit (MCUP) is requested to allow a second -story addition to a nonconforming structure with a preexisting 11 -foot building 4 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016 -XX separation to the house on the adjacent lot to the south (where 15 feet is required). The preexisting substandard distance to the structure on the adjacent lot to the south renders the project nonconforming. The addition of a nonconforming structure requires approval of a Minor Conditional Use Permit because the addition is greater than 50 percent of the existing home and is not limited to the ground floor. The proposed addition consisting of 1, 249 square feet of floor area and 361 square feet of patio/balcony area to an existing two-story home complies with the development standards of the RLM zone and will not further encroach into the nonconforming distance to the structure on the adjacent lot to the south. 2. The proposed use is consistent with the general plan and any applicable specific plan. The proposed addition to a single-family dwelling unit is consistent with the City's adopted General Plan. The site is not subject to the provisions of any specific plan. 3. The design, location, size and operating characteristics of the proposed use are compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity. The existing single-family dwelling and the proposed addition consisting of 1,249 square feet of floor area and 361 square feet of patio/balcony area will not further encroach into the existing nonconforming distance to the structure on the adjacent lot to the south of 11 feet. The proposed first floor addition is located at rear and side of the house and the second floor is located above the proposed first floor. The design of the existing single- family dwelling and the proposed addition are compatible with the character of the existing homes in the neighborhood because applicant is proposing to retain the existing building form, but is introducing contemporary details. In addition, the applicant is proposing trees—such as giant timber bamboo and king and queen palms—along the north and south property lines to provide screening to minimize privacy issues between the balconies and the adjacent properties to the north and south. In addition, the applicant is proposing frosted glass for the proposed second floor bedroom window to provide additional privacy between the subject property and the property to the south. Based on these observations, staff does not find privacy loss to be a project impact to the neighboring property with the frosted glass for the second floor bedroom window and planting of trees to serve as a visual buffer between the two properties. 4. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of use being proposed including access, provision of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and the absence of physical constraints. 5 Planning Commission Resolution No, 2016 -XX The Subject site is physically suitable for the existing single-family residential dwelling and the proposed addition. The existing and proposed use of land is consistent with the surrounding land uses. The proposed addition of floor area is consistent with the development standards for the RLM zone and will not .further encroach into the existing nonconforming distance to the structure on the adjacent lot to the south. The first floor addition is located at the rear and side of the house and the second floor addition is primarily located above the.proposed addition. 5. Granting the Minor Conditional Use Permit will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property or improvements in the vicinity and zoning district in which the property is located. The granting of the Minor Conditional Use Permit will allow the addition of the existing single-family dwelling unit in a manner similar with existing dwelling units located in the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed expansion of the dwelling unit will not negatively impact the public interest, health, safety convenience or welfare. 6. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as set forth under Article 19 Section 15301 (e) (additions to existing structure) of the CEQA Guidelines. Based upon the findings and conclusion set forth above, the Planning Commission hereby approves this Application, subject to the following conditions: Development shall substantially comply with the plans and documents presented to the Planning Commission at the public hearing. 2. Standard Conditions. The applicant shall comply with the standard development conditions attached hereto. The Planning Commission shall: a. Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail to the property owner/applicant, Justin Lee, 505 Bellows Court, Diamond Bar, CA 91765. 6 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016 -XX APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26th DAY OF JANUARY 2016, BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. M Jennifer Mahlke, Vice Chairperson 1, Greg Gubman, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of January, 2016, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: ABSTAIN: Commissioners: ATTEST: Greg Gubman, Secretary 7 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016 -XX ;1I 1 POO [1101 I)j 110 H111 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT USE PERMITS, COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL NEW Af%D REMODELED STRUCTURES PROJECT#: Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL 2015-98 SUBJECT: To construct a 1,249 square -foot two-story addition, 361 square feet of balcony and _patio area to an existing 1,564 square -foot, two-story single-family residence with an attached two -car garage PROPERTY Justin Lee OWNER/ 505 Bellows Court APPLICANT: Diamond Bar, CA 91765 LOCATION: 505 Bellows Ct. Diamond Bar, CA 91765 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION AT (909) 839-7030, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, and its officers, agents and employees, from any claim, action, or proceeding to attack, set-aside, void or annul, the approval of Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL2015-98 brought within the time period provided by Government Code Section 66499.37. In the event the city and/or its officers, agents and employees are made a party of any such action: (a) Applicant shall provide a defense to the City defendants or at the City's option reimburse the City its costs of defense, 8 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016 -XX including reasonable attorneys fees, incurred in defense of such claims. (b) Applicant shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against the City defendants. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action of proceeding, and shall cooperate fully in the defense thereof. 2. This approval shall not be effective for any purpose until the applicant and owner of the property involved have filed, within twenty-one (21) days of approval of this Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL2015-98, at the City of Diamond Bar Community Development Department, their affidavit stating that they are aware of and agree to accept all the conditions of this approval. Further, this approval shall not be effective until the applicants pay remaining City processing fees, school fees and fees for the review of submitted reports. 3. All designers, architects, engineers, and contractors associated with this project shall obtain a Diamond Bar Business License; and a zoning approval for those businesses located in Diamond Bar. 4. Signed copies of Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016 -XX, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 5. Prior to the plan check, revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval. 6. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval shall be completed. 7. The project site shall be maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of approval and all laws, or other applicable regulations. 8. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and any applicable Specific Plan in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 9 Planning Commission Resolution No, 2016 -XX 9. All site, grading, landscape/irrigation, and roof plans, and elevation plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of City permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 10. The property owner/applicant shall remove the public hearing notice board within three days of this project's approval. 11. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of City Planning, Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works Department, and the Fire Department. B. FEES/DEPOSITS Applicant shall pay development fees (including but not limited to Planning, Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works Department and Mitigation Monitoring) at the established rates, prior to issuance of building or grading permit (whichever comes first), as required by the City. School fees as required shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permit. In addition, the applicant shall pay all remaining prorated City project review and processing fees prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever comes first. 2. Prior to any plan check, all deposit accounts for the processing of this project shall have no deficits. C. TIME LIMITS The approval of Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL2015-98 expires within two years from the date of approval if the use has not been exercised as defined pursuant to Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Section 22.66.050(b)(1). In accordance with DBIVIC Section 22.60.050(c), the applicant may request, in writing, a one-year time extension for Planning Commission consideration. Such a request must be submitted to the Planning Division prior to the expiration date and be accompanied by the review fee in accordance with the Fee Schedule in effect at the time of submittal. This approval is to construct a two-story addition consisting of 1,249 square feet of floor area and 361 square feet of patio and balcony area to an existing single-family residence located at 505 Bellows Court, as described in the staff report and depicted on 10 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016 -XX the approved plans on file with the Planning Division, subject to the conditions listed herein. 2. The construction documents submitted for plan check shall be in substantial compliance with the architectural plans approved by the Planning Commission, as modified pursuant to the conditions below. If the plan check submittal is not in substantial compliance with the approved Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit submittal, the plans may require further staff review and re - notification of the surrounding property owners, which may delay the project and entail additional fees. 3. To ensure compliance with the provisions of the Planning Commission approval, a final inspection is required from the Planning Division when work for any phase of the project has been completed. The applicant shall inform the Planning Division and schedule an appointment for such an inspection. 4. The above conditions shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all future owners, operators, or successors thereto of the property. Non-compliance with any condition of approval or mitigation measure imposed as a condition of the approval shall constitute a violation of the City's Development Code. Violations may be enforced in accordance with the provisions of the Development Code. 5. Failure to comply with any of the conditions set forth above or as subsequently amended in writing by the City, may result in failure to obtain a building final and/or a certificate of occupancy until full compliance is reached. The City's requirement for full compliance may require minor corrections and/or complete demolition of a. non- compliant improvement, regardless of costs incurred where the project does not comply with design requirements and approvals that the applicant agreed to when permits were pulled to construct the project. 6. The project site shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the approved plans submitted to, approved, and amended herein by the Planning Commission, collectively attached referenced as site plans, floor plans, architectural elevations, and landscape plans on file with the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 7. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, air conditioning condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete 11 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016 -XX or masonry walls, berms, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Division. 8. All roof -mounted equipment shall be screened from public view. 9. All structures, including walls, trash enclosures, canopies, etc., shall be maintained in a structurally sound, safe manner with a clean, orderly appearance. All graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours by the property owners/occupant. 10. All landscaping, structures, architectural features and public improvements damaged during construction shall be repaired or replaced upon project completion. E. SOLID WASTE The site shall be maintained in a condition, which is free of debris both during and after the construction, addition, or implementation of the entitlement approved herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether during or subsequent to construction shall be done only by the property owner, applicant or by a duly permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste from residential, commercial, construction, and industrial areas within the City. It shall be the applicant's obligation to insure that the waste contractor used has obtained permits from the City of Diamond Bar to provide such services. 2. Mandatory solid waste disposal services shall be provided by the City franchised waste hauler to all parcels/lots or uses affected by approval of this project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, (909) 839-7040, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. GENERAL An Erosion Control Plan shall be submitted concurrently with the grading plan clearly detailing erosion control measures. These measures shall be implemented during construction. The erosion control plan shall conform to national Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards and incorporate the appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP's) as specified in the Storm Water BMP Certification. For construction activity which disturbs one acre or greater soil a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be needed. 12 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016 -XX C. DRAINAGE 1 Detailed drainage system information of the lot with careful attention to any flood hazard area shall be submitted. All drainage/runoff from the development shall be conveyed from the site to the natural drainage course. No on-site drainage shall be conveyed to adjacent parcels, unless that is the natural drainage course. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 839-7020, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. GENERAL CONDITIONS: 1 At the time of plan check submittal, plans and construction shall conform to current State and Local Building Code (i.e., 2013 California Building Code series will apply) requirements and all other applicable construction codes, ordinances and regulations in effect. 2. Provisions for CALGreen shall be implemented onto plans and certification shall be provided by a third party as required by the Building Division. Specific water, waste, low VOC, and related conservation measures shall be shown on plans. Construction shall conform to the current CALGreen Code. B. PLAN CHECK — ITEMS TO BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO PLAN APPROVAL: 1. The minimum design load for wind in this area is 110 M.P.H. exposures "C" and the site is within seismic zone D or E. The applicant shall submit drawings and calculations prepared by a California State licensed Architect/Engineer with wet stamp. and signature. 2. This project shall comply with the energy conservation requirements of the State of California Energy Commission. All lighting shall be high efficacy or equivalent per the current California Energy Code 119 and 150(k). 3. Indoor air quality shall be provided consistent with ASHRAE 62.2 as required per California Energy- Code 150(0). 4. Public Works/Engineering Department is required to review and approve grading plans that clearly show all finish elevations, drainage, and retaining wall(s) locations. These plans shall be 13 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016 -XX consistent with the site plan submitted to the Building and Safety Division. 5. "Separate permits are required for pools" and shall be noted on plans. 6. All balconies shall be designed for 60lb/ft live load. 7. All easements shall be shown on the site plan. 8. A soils report is required per CBC 1803 and all recommendations of the soils report shall be adhered to. 9. Slope setbacks shall be consistent with California Building Code Figure 1805.3.1 and California Residential Code R403.1.7. Foundations shall provide a minimum distance to daylight. C. Permit — Items required prior to building permit issuance: 1. Solid waste management of construction material shall incorporate recycling material collection per Diamond Bar Municipal Code 8.16 of Title 8. The contractor shall complete all required forms and pay applicable deposits prior to permit. 2. Prior to building permit issuance, all school district fees shall be paid. Please obtain a form from the Building and Safety Division to take directly to the school district. 3. Submit drainage plans clearly showing all finish elevations, drainage patterns for the overall project, and slope setback criteria for the pool area. Surface water shall drain away from the building at a 2% minimum slope. 4. AQMD notification is required at least 10 days prior to any demolition. Proof of notification is required at permit issuance. 5. All workers on the job shall be covered by workman's compensation insurance under a licensed general contractor. Any changes to the contractor shall be updated on the building permit. 6. An occupancy separation shall be shown and provided between the garage and dwelling. 14 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016 -XX D. CONSTRUCTION — CONDITIONS REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION: Every permit issued by the building official under the provisions of this Code shall expire and become null and void unless the work authorized by such permit is commenced within one -hundred -eighty (180) days after permit issuance, and if a successful inspection has not been obtained from the building official within one -hundred - eighty (180) days from the date of permit issuance or the last successful inspection. A successful inspection shall mean a documented passed inspection by the city building inspector as outlined in Section 110.6. 3. The project shall be protected by a construction fence to the satisfaction of the Building Official, and shall comply with the NPDES & BMP requirements (sand bags, etc.). All fencing shall be view obstructing with opaque surfaces. 2. All structures and property shall be maintained in a safe and clean manner during construction. The property shall be free of debris, trash, and weeds. 3. All equipment staging areas shall be maintained in an orderly manner and screened behind a minimum 6' high fence. 4. The applicant shall contact Dig Alert and have underground utility locations marked by the utility companies prior to any excavation. Contact Dig Alert by dialing 811 or their website at www.di.galert.org. 5. The applicant shall first request and secure approval from the City for any changes or deviations from approved plans prior to proceeding with any work in accordance with such changes or deviations. 6. All glazing in hazardous locations shall be labeled as safety glass. The labeling shall be visible for inspection. 7. Pursuant to California Residential Code (CRC) Section R315, carbon monoxide detectors are required in halls leading to sleeping rooms. 8. Decks, roofs, and other flat surfaces shall slope at least 1/4"/ft with approved and listed water proofing material. Guardrails shall be provided for these surfaces at least 42" minimum in height, 4" maximum spacing between rails, and capable of resisting at least 20 pounds per lineal foot of lateral load. 15 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016 -XX 9. Special inspections and structural observation will be required in conformance to CBC 1704 to 1709. 10. All plumbing fixtures, including those in existing areas, shall be low - flow models consistent with California Civil Code Section 1101.1 to M U11 Mi 16 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016 -XX 1. Exterior Stucco Sanded finished 2. Exterior Stucco Sanded finished 3. Patio/ French doors SLIDING 4. Sliding windows Fj;11 Wj)j M FIXED 5. Fixed casing windows ( No grids) 10 Exterior main entrance door 7. Concrete tile roof- gray , (,using existing style) 8. Exterior deck railings- Steel 9. Exterior spiral staircase I Attachment 2 -p - CF ,IVED _E CITY OF DM90'ND BAR 1-� Plot Plan Scale: O mm P-*- 15gam Ir-WWRIMHEM Q�Pw 1&0.ft lWWTAP.Wf0= C..WM.-d Mb. 2MMUMUMMU chwu- mm'ft W-VTAMMOW sQ im— —0. 4pmm mrT.."amow ABBUTING DWELLING SINGLE STORY hid LOT COVERAGE TOTAL 2688S.F.=IM (')r-rijnnmr--v(Zrntjn- P-1/11 PROJECT INFO Owner JUSTIN LEE Address: 505 BELLOWS COURT DIAMOND BAR, CA ISSUE DA7r-- AUG 2013 DRAWN BY: Vic SCALE: as noted RevIslons: 1. 2. 3. 4. i pm -7, 13 M 0AV lM-llZLFtDV"MMTCU COV"%Qkvl7n PSMO-UM FAXUMM= F.*ftdnWdMCP..U- Content Table Al site plan A? -O O)W floor plans A2.t first floor A2.2 second floor A3 elevations A4 roof plan Si ftmdatiDn S2 first floor frarring S3 second floorkMing S4 detatis SS detafis S6 stab detalls HM hardy frames HFX2 hardy banes HFX3 hardy ftom PROJECT INFO Owner JUSTIN LEE Address: 505 BELLOWS COURT DIAMOND BAR, CA ISSUE DA7r-- AUG 2013 DRAWN BY: Vic SCALE: as noted RevIslons: 1. 2. 3. 4. i pm _ I�I I-1------�/ 11 ----II I I IL --JI I I I i ii ----Iii xistinq first floor Scale: l/4' E -Bedroom li` E -bath Ij I E -Bedroom Existing second floor Scale: l/4' In=1' (r E -Bedroom PROJECT INFO Owner JUSTIN LEE Address 505 BELLOWS COURT DIAMOND BAR, CA ISSUE DATE: AUG 2013 DRAWN BY: Vic SCALE as noted RevWons 1. 2 3. 4. ,i'i.,� — PLAN NO. - - 3820 _ SHEETaaNO. `! G . First Floor Scale: i/4" In --I0 FLOOR PLAN NOTES: 1. Ail Branch circuits that supply 120 V. single phase, 1 S & 20 Amps outside Ir s olied In dweifinp uNf faMN rooms, doing rooms. livingq rooms, reocreallon rooms, tlbraffes, dens, bedrooms, sunrooms, parlors, closets, hallways of simlior rooms or meas shdi be protected by a listed arc•tault circuit interrupter(AFCI), combination -type. 2. Ail 12,vof. IS and 20p receptacles In a dwelling unit shall be listed as Tamper resistant. 3. S pke & CO ala s shall be interconnected so that the acfivofion of one alarm ocirvafes dl the otpier alums. Location of Had Wired Smoke Alarms: a.) In each sleeping room b.) Outside each separate sleeping area in the immedote vicinity of bedrooms. c.) On each story.basement, and habitable attics. d.j On ceiling of upper level in close proximity to the stoirwgy when sleeping areas are on the upper level. a.) In the adiocent am (a' area) where the ceiling height exceeds that of the hallway by 24" a more. Smoke Alarm Regtimmentm a.) Battery operaled smoke oiroms permitted in the existing buiidngs where no consfruclion Is laking place Orin buildng undergoing alteration or repair that do not result In the removal of Interior walls ceiling a finishes, unless there Is an attic, crawl space or basement whtch couitl provide access for wiring. b.) Smoke alarms shall be Interconnected such that the activation of one darn will activate all alattns in the Individual unit. C.) Smoke detectors shall be "hard wired' and shall be equipped with battery backup. Carbon Monoxide Alarm Requirements: a.) An approved carbon monoxide shall be installed for new construction and W. requiring permit exceedng 51000.00. b.) Smoke detectors shall be 'hard wired" and shall be eqipped with battery backup. c.) CO alarms shall be listed for compliance with UL 2034, UL 2074. and/or NFPA 720. d.) CO alarms shall be installed outside of each sleeping area in the Immediate vicinity of the bedrooms and on every level of a dwelling unit including basement. e.) CO alarms shall be Interconnected such that the activation of one cham wit activate all alarms in the indviduai dweiGng unit. I.) In existing dwelling unit a CO aldrm Is permitted to be battery operated where repair SMNG WALLSTORD" LIVING AREA. PROPOSED NEW WALLS FIRST FLOOR WALL TO BEREMOVE D PATCH E,"V 7D] a f. Ptd 1189 s.f. fird fir tDW 1889 a f. SECOND FLOOR "'I p5-3 S4 - Froposed 877 s f. second fir boW 154110. New Grana! Tttel S,"Pl a f. Eidat9tg Garage 438 af. -- HARDWIRE SMOKE DOE= WITH OLD. BATTERY BACK-UP -e- CARBON MONO)I EALARM C)" �- UMSTDSNGLEPOLESWLit3i MiAUST FAN W/UGHr PROVIDES SD CFM v a o o PiUORESCENIT L1GHIl MR PROJECT INFO Owner. JUSTIN LEE Address 505 BELLOWS COURT DIAMOND BAR, CA ISSUE DATE: AUG 2013 DRAWN BY: Vic SCALY as noted ReviSlcins: 1. 2. 3. 4. PLAN NO. — - j 3820 V, SHEET NO. 11 %� 2.1 PROPOSED NEW WALLS ------- WALL TO BEREMOVE D PATCH TO MATCH D MIM RELIJMENSMNJ ( BLDG.SiD.DUMMOUREr t L"D NiERRLHt XI PROTeCTED AFCI@a ARCFAULTCRCURHresumm BLDG. WALL LIGHT OUTDOOR WALL LIGHT RXFUM HIGH EFFZACY -- HARDWIRE SMOKE DOE= WITH OLD. BATTERY BACK-UP -e- CARBON MONO)I EALARM C)" �- UMSTDSNGLEPOLESWLit3i MiAUST FAN W/UGHr PROVIDES SD CFM v a o o PiUORESCENIT L1GHIl MR PROJECT INFO Owner. JUSTIN LEE Address 505 BELLOWS COURT DIAMOND BAR, CA ISSUE DATE: AUG 2013 DRAWN BY: Vic SCALY as noted ReviSlcins: 1. 2. 3. 4. PLAN NO. — - j 3820 V, SHEET NO. 11 %� 2.1 Second Floor Scale: EMMG WALISTO REMAI! -;e-- HARDWIRE SMOKE DETECTOR WITH O PROPOS® NEW WALLS OIL BATTERY BACK-UP ------ WALLTO BE REMOVED PATCH GIRBONMONO)R7EALARM --'---- TO MATCH 0311 . PROJECT INFO Owner. JUSTIN LEE Address: 505 BELLOWS COURT DIAMOND BAR, CA ISSUE DATE: AUG 2013 DRAWN BY: Vic SCALE: as noted Revisions: t. 2. a ,. PLAN NO. j 3820 SHEET NO. r /� 2 �• BtDG.smswcaEPotEswnnH � BIDG.SID.WPLE%ODUEf , DQUUISTFANwAIGHTPROVW5DCFM -� GROUNDFALM1TCRCUITN1t3iR41PIBt WATBT PROTBCIED AFCl&= . ARCFAUlTCRCLITTMRRUfMR a o o oRlJORMCENrLrAirBAR -!�- BLDG WALL LIGHT 4- 99 -FM - -C'�}` LIGHT FOUIIiE HOUMOORW YALL PROJECT INFO Owner. JUSTIN LEE Address: 505 BELLOWS COURT DIAMOND BAR, CA ISSUE DATE: AUG 2013 DRAWN BY: Vic SCALE: as noted Revisions: t. 2. a ,. PLAN NO. j 3820 SHEET NO. r /� 2 v 2 EaveSHAUL MATCH BWNG Side Elevation Scale: IN In --I' 01 0-1111 ---------- OverhangSHALL MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION NOTE: 1. ALL BUILDING MATERIALS, EXTERIOR WALL FINISHES, ROOFING MATERIAL AND BUILDING COLORS SHALL MATCH THE DWNG HOUSE. Z SCRATCH COAT INSPECTION IS REQUIRED. 3. ALL PROPOSED WINDOW STYLE AND INSTALLATION SHALL MATCH DWNG Side Elevation SEE MATERIAL BOARD FOR R89MMCE Scale: IX1rr-I'-W Nisfing Proposed -------------------------------------------- - FROSIM ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------ t<ear tievaTion Scale: 1/4'Irr-I'-0 Proposed Bdsting b(f0ing Proposed Front Elevation Scale, 1/4" In=V-01 PROJECT INFO Owner. JUSTIN LEE Address: 505 BELLOWS COURT DIAMOND BAR, CA ISSUE DATE: AUG 2013 DRAWN BY. Vic SCALE: as noted Revislons: 1. z 3. 4. - PLAN NO. A 3820 SHEET GNO. ,:_fZ A3 R -1r 3 batt Irmi5a4on g7CmTmyt oce D btPftpdmkM teff adhering fthlrg 'g— vycDr P(W p1wood slilset oncoriltm; beaclolmdaritalork9adatiorackp of concrais hill sealant 0 ftatft edge 9.b I Wee*p Screed v 2 EaveSHAUL MATCH BWNG Side Elevation Scale: IN In --I' 01 0-1111 ---------- OverhangSHALL MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION NOTE: 1. ALL BUILDING MATERIALS, EXTERIOR WALL FINISHES, ROOFING MATERIAL AND BUILDING COLORS SHALL MATCH THE DWNG HOUSE. Z SCRATCH COAT INSPECTION IS REQUIRED. 3. ALL PROPOSED WINDOW STYLE AND INSTALLATION SHALL MATCH DWNG Side Elevation SEE MATERIAL BOARD FOR R89MMCE Scale: IX1rr-I'-W Nisfing Proposed -------------------------------------------- - FROSIM ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------ t<ear tievaTion Scale: 1/4'Irr-I'-0 Proposed Bdsting b(f0ing Proposed Front Elevation Scale, 1/4" In=V-01 PROJECT INFO Owner. JUSTIN LEE Address: 505 BELLOWS COURT DIAMOND BAR, CA ISSUE DATE: AUG 2013 DRAWN BY. Vic SCALE: as noted Revislons: 1. z 3. 4. - PLAN NO. A 3820 SHEET GNO. ,:_fZ A3 AREA: IBM aL "MMIM. QWwMxi44-ismasm PRO's AT�NETBQJPLEACt#MMX Not= OW _ ' ah or q�ptwsd m amtt wM ie ffirk m rd t14h;rp opmtg A ff*9nm d }6f = pmvW kwhEffin 16 O2. 7,47smol wtr UMECM1 SMO \ 1`� 2,-0- 8• ATTIC VENT CALCULATIONS SCALE N.T.S. MXNC AS(h71'�� 2 X UUf NG n 72 UNDER A14@Nf MF SHEMINC (SEE SI LMRAL PUNS) I 2 I ------------------- I I I 4:12 I New Dect w p I I I I 1 ,tit o =L ------------------------------ Roof Ian Scale: „4'lrr-,�-01' X a4F 1 1 vp IN I I I I I I I I =D I ill ER go►;�io`�orr�p �oa 1 PROJECT INFO Owner JUSTIN LEE Address: 505 BELLOWS COURT DIAMOND BAR, CA ISSUE DATE: AUG 2013 DRAWN BY: Vic SCALA as noted Revisions: 2. 3. 4. Z W of d 0 m� r') Z 0�>- d0 0 � W 0Lu U� Z Z) 0 U zW 0� (D orf)W z w U) or_ Z Q z > <=IOQJ U =JWW:7 0 U=z2ZU m0_�z�� (L0<ILQU u z 11 u u n 00- <nIL o QU 0 Z W W J M v� U �- c+� 0 0 0 0 0 0 ro -o o a ro m ro ro U�m 0_N a p O 4- O 4- O 4- O 4- O 4- N m 15 (T C CY) C ZT C 0) C (T C O o 3 3 3 (D U L 1 C O I c o i c o I c O i C O N E L) U v Q Q Q a Q CD ca m M U 0m Cro a) 0 (D a)N C O. Q. D. Q O. C C U U U U 'o O C) g m o 0 0 0 0 U! N U) p E -o N a N N o (D a a) O E .� O E O O O O O> U ro N '> C C c C C C C C C C CD �+= > N > N N — O Cw O C' O C C: C' {_ Z C E L L L L L L m ro m (6 m m m ro m ro O N 0 0 _ C c � v roa a0 ao Q `O Q 0 n `o r ro In a C = c a 4- a 4- d .E a 4- d .C: a �'�'- d .E CL 4- ¢ .S U 0 QCL C a ¢ CL Q. O > a) C O = d U) J u W S ro ^a d W U_ cc >C -roi U Q t J 7 a° z n' W w Z Z Z W W o d cG Z CD N `- O N N r 00 - Cl) ti U) co � N LD Lr)O � (U() tD - I r N CS7 Lf) r N O O O O O N _I O � r O N N N -i tL -i NO -i J 0- J 0- J CL dCL -1 0- O s- N ON (L CL n CL 0 ry p U U U U _ _ N U c O = N C > W a) -a) N -O = .a O O � •- Cll Z > y v - U) N O. to U C *(o _ "U> '� `- U m C C) C O z W o _ a) a p 0' _ co N a) 1- Q O (n '� -y J _ E cn m � c L E L m L m= c cn E D (n _i m ro W ,C 4M- C- T .00 `� ro 0 m� W o ro ° (0' E o roc w 0 0 D E E J ac _ U > ° Q) .9 � 0 4- > U i m_ L C O � E 0 0 E u) ro Z- t ro - j } O U U) rn -p U) U W F- 0 =3 (n Z O -Op m C) 00 _ M O � co N CD N C) � O O O O J (, C C N c ro CO CCS = _ . ` r U- W C" = U O = a) .o C z q O m (n 2 ('=j Cn (n U (n ro Uj .� �- (n .� d j Z � = CD = Z O W (D 'a .- �S m C O >i N Z7 O N (n pQ O O W (OD O ¢ ((DZ OZ -0 NQ (`)Z Nm r Z � Z N Q. CL N (CS Q W Z �- N O N. <- .- N zW 0� (D orf)W z w U) or_ Z Q z > <=IOQJ U =JWW:7 0 U=z2ZU m0_�z�� (L0<ILQU u z 11 u u n 00- <nIL o QU 0 Z W W J 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o '0 m cu 10- 10 10 'o0 � 0 0 0 010 tm 0) 0) tm 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) C: •m •com 3: cu Z - •ca m m m •m •ca •co 0 C: 0 C: 0 C 0 C C: 0 C 0 C: .0 .0 0 (n 0 ZZ .0 Z-- • L•0-•0-•0- CL 0- •CL C- • CL CL CL • Q- • 0 -•CL CL CL CL D. U) CL CU CL m co m m m ca a) a) a) a) a) a) a a "a E a- E CL E ca. E CL E 0L E a E CL E CL E E 0 E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .C: 0 C C: C: r- C: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _0a (D a _0 -0 '0 -o a) '0 a) 3: 2 0 0c C:• (D 0 c c a) .- 0 c c 0 c C: C: 0 r_ c 0 C: r_ 0 c C: 0 c c 0 c c a) > a) > m a) (n 0 C: *= 0 P > O r- .2 > o o — o 0 M -� .0 C, —.2 a) m co L-) E m m E Mt5 E " m m E cu E m .9 E M E M 0E E -a .0 E -a E (D a) •a) "a =0 'a CL '0 -a -a -a 0� 0 Q CL 'o C: C� 'o < CL < C CL 'o < c C, 'o < 0'.0- - < c,- 'o < a 'o < CL, -o < 0-,0.- < < < CY) C: CY) c 0) a C m (D C: co - ca mp 'a D- 3: -r cr, M =3 -a =3 0 CY) 0) 0) C: < =3m 2i a) 0m E co cz > C) 42) C: 0 0 a) 0 co E L) co -le m a) 0 LU F- ui LLJ w z w LU YJ ui ui ui F - ui z z ui w z z z z z 2 z i ) z z z z 00 C\l 0) 0) 0 m 0) CY) V) LO 0 C� N Cl? LO V) N I — N 0 — LO �o (o 10 LO LO U-) Lo LO LO m LO LO m LO 4 u-) O 0 0 0 0 N 0 C, 0 cl C) N 0 N CD N 0 I N cli U- -i -j D- n CL IL o- 0i n CL rr, D- ry D- w a. ry o- o- n, ry n, ry 5 o- < ry r) r) :D C) D C) .C: U) O a) 0 a) a) (D (n u cn U) (n a) '0 C: C a) C: a) > a) a) (D a) > '0 "0 *U) > .7 U) E cn E "0 n E a) L.: a) a) L: cu Ca E U) U) a) 2 " a 0 0 a) a) -Fo 0 2, C: 0 'co 0 q) a) A? -�e > -�e (D a) a) c a) (D (D (D (n > U) -j M CL 0-0 r_ a a) E .5 a > a > -0 w C: =3 CU cr, 0 E 0 E iD C: —, o cy Ca r c- E E 0 L6 - 0 L) 0 (n C: U) 0 0 Ca Cr •-S (n (n 4- w a) cn C: in 4M- �-M 4) c E c: 'rY cn V) LL F- w 0 a) 42 (D -0 U) w 0 0 0 (D a) (n CD 0 L) 0 a 0 c 0 O)o — M E (D (n 0 Q) cr. cD cy, E (D > 0 C: cu co m a) cn -0 C 'a C: U) LL LL -0 2 r -F -- _j 0 ry C: E r- 0 S �: -= U) in = E J? E cl) c tm u) V) co in N M z cu E3 a) Cl) m n U) co , LO LO — Lo L) co co 3: m ta 'Cl) 3r o :6 > co 15 LO 0-0 00 � m C) - (n LO r - m z c: ui I !ldcL 0 Zn 0-0 C) U w (m a) co -5 t 41) — LO Z 't m E cD cl) cy) a) c—' CO :2 C\l Z Cl) < CO Z 7, < C%4 cy) < a) m 1� z r- z N C', t a. n C,4 t:�, 42 N N— — VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION -AGENDA ITEM: � - �1_ SUBJECT: i- a _S_ L TO: Planning Commission DATE: SPEAKER NAME: e_ rQ (Please print clearly) ADDRESS: 560 139ilow (Please print clearly) I would like to address the Planning Commission on the above stated item. Please have the Commission Minutes reflect my name and address as printed above Sign'a� Note: This form is intended to assist the Chairman in. ensuring that all persons wishing to address the Commission will have the opportunity to do so, and to ensure correct spelling of names in the Minutes. After completion, please submit your form to the Planning Commission Secretary. Thank you. VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION -7-2- SUBJECT: __L AGENDA ITEM:— L 6% C-o-'Aarl-7 TO: Planning Commission DATE: I - 2-G - 16 . .. SPEAKER NAME: (Please print clearly) ;6 2- -_ _%c: FS -`9G -PLAN 2,At%,9 Zkc (Please print clearly) I would like to address the Planning Commission on the above tated *tem. Please have the Commission Minutes reflect my name and address as printed above . ZA;; Signature Note: This form is intended to assist the Chairman in, ensuring that all persons wishing to address the Commission will have the opportunity to do so, and to ensure correct spelling of names in the Minutes. After completion, please submit your form to the Planning Commission Secretary. Thank you. _ I I A WFVAXIW• � C NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING AND AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 1, Stella Marquez, declare as follows: On January 26, 2016, the Diamond Bar Planning Commission will hold a Regular Meeting at 7:00 p.m. at City, Windmill Community Room, 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California. I am employed by the City of Diamond Bar. On January22, 2016, a copy of the Planning Commission Agenda was posted at the following locations: .South Coast Quality Management District Auditorium 21865 East Copley Drive. Diamond Bar, CA, 91765 Diamond Bar Library 21800 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Heritage Park 2900 Brea Canyon Road Diamond Bar, CA 91765 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on January 22, 2016, at Diamond Bar, California. Stella Marquez C Wzstel I a\a I'll d av i tpost ill -A 0C