Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/14/2010 AGENDA Regular MeetingCOMMISSION AGENDA January 14, 2010 7:00 P.M., Regular Meeting South Coast Air Quality Management District Hearing Board Room 21865 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, California Chair Vice -Chair Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Jimmy Lin Kevin House Kenneth Mok Liana Pincher Michael Shay Written materials distributed to the Trac and Transportation Connnission within 72 hours of-tl7e Trac and Ti•a77spo7 tation Co77miissia7l meeting are available forpublic inspection immediately upon distribution in the City Clerk's office at21825 Copley Drive, DiainondBar, California, during norn7al business hours. Copies ofstaffreports or other written documentation relating to agenda items are on file in the Public Works Department located at 21825 Copley Drive, and are available for public inspection. Ifyou have questions regarding an agenda ite7n, please call (909) 839- 7040 during regular business hours. In an effort to comply with the requirements of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the City ofDtan7ond Bar requires that any person in need of any type ofspecial equipment, assistance, or acconmtodation(s) in order to communicate at a City public meeting must i77forn7 the Public Works Department at (909) 839-7040 a minimum of 72 hoursprim• to the scheduled meeting. Please refrain fi•onv smoking, eating or drinking The City of Diamond Bar uses recycled paper in the Auditorium and encourages you to do the same CITY OF DIAMOND BAR TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AGENDA January 14, 2010 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT HEARING BOARD ROOM 21865 COPLEY DRIVE, DIAMOND BAR CALL TO ORDER: 7.•00 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. Commissioner Mok ROLL CALL: Commissioner Mok, Pincher, Shay, Vice -Chair House, Chair Lin APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Minutes of October 8, 2009 II. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. III. ITEMS FROM STAFF A. Traffic Enforcement Update * 1. Citations: October, November & December 2009 2. Collisions: October, November & December 2009 3. Street Sweeping: October, November & December 2009 IV. OLD BUSINESS A. Palomino Drive Neighborhood Traffic Management Program Update 1. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Traffic and Transportation Commission receive and file the report by staff regarding the results of the Palomino Drive Neighborhood Traffic Management Program. V. NEW BUSINESS A. Prohibition of Parking on Residential Streets in the Crestline Annexation Area for the Purposes of Street Sweeping 1. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Traffic and Transportation Commission concur with staff to prohibit parking on Mondays between the hours of 11:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. along Oak Crest Drive, Ridge Point Drive, the westerly side of Diamond Canyon Road, and a portion of Crestline Drive._ B. Stop Sign and Pavement Legend Installation at the Intersection of Gold Rush Drive and Charmingdale Road 1. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Traffic and Transportation Commission concur with staff regarding the installation of the stop sign and pavement legend at the referenced intersection. VI. STATUS OF PREVIOUS ACTION ITEMS VII. ITEMS FROM COMMISSIONERS VIII. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS A. Diamond Bar TMS/Traffic Signal Interconnect Links — Phase II B. Traffic Signal Battery Back -Up System Project C. Lycoming Street Rehabilitation Project D. Industry's Grand Avenue Bridge Widening/Interchange Project E. SR -57/60 Feasibility Study F. Lemon Avenue On/Off-Ramps Project G. Residential —Area 6 Slurry Seal Project H. Arterial — Zone 3/Zone 4 Slurry Seal Project (American Recovery & Reinvestment Act) I. Chino Hills Parkway Street Rehab. Project J. Cieghorn/Gold Nugget and Maple Hill NTMP IX. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE CITY EVENTS A. WINTER SNOW FEST— Saturday, January 16, 2010-10 a.m. —4:00 p. m., Pantera Park, 738 Pantera Drive B. CITY COUNCIL MEETING — Tuesday, January 19, 2010 — 6:30 p.m., AQMD/Government Center, Main Auditorium, 21865 Copley Drive C. NTMPCLEGHORN/GOLD NUGGET MEETING— Thursday, January 21, 2010-7:00 p.m., AQMD/Government Center, Room CC -6, 21865 Copley Drive D. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING — Tuesday, January 26, 2010 -7:00 p.m., AQMD/Government Center, Main Auditorium, 21865 Copley Drive. E. FOUR CORNERS TRANSPORTATION AND ECONOMIC SUMMIT — Thursday, January 28, 2010 — 10:00 a.m. — 2:00 p.m., Diamond Bar Center, 1600 S. Grand Avenue PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING —Thursday; January 28, 2010 — 7:00 p.m., AQMD/Government Center, Hearing Board Room, 21865 Copley Drive. G. CITY COUNCIL MEETING — Tuesday, February 2, 2010 — 6:30 p.m., AQMD/Government Center, Main Auditorium, 21865 Copley Drive H. NTMP MAPLE HILL MEETING — Thursday, February 4, 2010 — 7:00 p.m., AQMD/Government Center, (Room to be determined), 21865 Copley Drive X. ADJOURNMENT THIS INFORMATION WILL DE PROVIDED AT THE JANUARY 14, 2010 MEETING CITY OF DIAMOND BAR MINUTES OF THE TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING OCTOBER 8, 2009 CALL TO ORDER: VC/House called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. in the South Coast Air Quality Management/Government Center Hearing Board Room, 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California 91765. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: ROLL CALL: Absent: Also Present: APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Chairman Lin led the Pledge of Allegiance. Commissioners Kenneth Mok, Liana Pincher, Vice -Chairman Kevin House and Chairman Jimmy Lin Commissioner Michael Shay was excused. David Liu, Public Works Director; Rick Yee, Senior Civil Engineer; Christian Malpica-Perez, Associate Engineer, and Marcy Hilario, Senior Administrative Assistant. A. Minutes of the September 10, 2009 regular meeting. C/Mok moved, VC/House seconded, to approve the September 10, 2009 minutes as presented. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Mok, Pincher, VC/House Chair/Lin NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Shay PUBLIC COMMENTS: Resident Jack Fong said that he and fellow residents, Nina Goncharov and Stan Granger, have been trying for eight or nine months to get the petition signatures needed to satisfy the NTMP demands to establish speed bumps in the Cleghorn/Gold Nugget area. There has been a great deal of effort on the part of Ms. Goncharov and Mr. Granger to gather the second set of signatures. Mr. Fong wanted to believe they had complied with the numbers and wanted to know why there is an issue about them having to get more signatures. PWD/Liu explained that AE/Molina has been communicating with representatives from the neighborhood. He said it was his understanding that the request for 67 percent was understood by the representatives of the community and, while the City has a significant amount of signatures, his ultimate concern is that the 67 percent signature requirement was not reached. It had come to staff's attention that there were some addresses on Monument Canyon Road that were inadvertently OCTOBER 8, 2009 PAGE 2 T&T COMMISSION l - overlooked in the initial mailings regarding the NTMP. Approximately 49 residents in a condo complex had not been provided information regarding the proposed request for speed cushions. With that said, PWD/Liu stated that while additional signatures are not being required, he requested that an attempt be made to communicate with those condo residents. He believes there are a• sufficient number of signatures to allow the Commission to concur with staff's recommendation to move forward with Phase II of the project (speed cushions). C/Mok inquired about what Phase II involves and PWD/Liu confirmed that it was education and speed cushions. This is an open and on-going process. C/Mok asked, worst case scenario, if every condo resident was opposed to the project, would that stop the project? PWD/Liu said that, as discussed during the last T&T Commission meeting, the residents along Cleghorn Drive and Monument Canyon Road could take advantage of a downsized project to focus the effort along Gold Nugget Drive. Mr. Fong said that this is not strictly a condo centric issue. Gold Nugget is a street with only single family residents and his neighborhood is adjacent to the condo complex. When he first conducted the petition drive to get to the 51 percent of residents' signatures, it was difficult to get feedback because of the ethnic diversity and unwillingness to become involved. Some residents do not speak or understand English which could be a hindrance. In his opinion, these cultural issues have to be taken into consideration in meeting the percentages and it involves a long campaign ( effort. Chair/Lin explained that PWD/Liu's point is that regardless of the outcome of the outreach to condo owners, staff is recommending mitigation. However, the 49 condo residents need to be made aware of the process. PWD/Liu responded to Chair/Lin that the residents (property owners and renters) need to be contacted. C/Pincher said she understood that the condo occupants received all of the literature for the neighborhood meetings. PWD/Liu said that when staff was establishing the database that it presented to the representatives, the 49 condo units had Monument Canyon addresses and were not included in the list. As a result, he made the decision that outreach should continue to include those residents as well. C/Pincher said these issues of diversity and condominium units backing up to single family homes was a factor in many areas of the City. She commended the residents on their effort. Ms. Goncharov said she has visited some of the homes several times and has met resistance in getting residents to open their doors due to the recent increase in crime on Gold Nugget and other streets. Some houses are empty and should probably be removed from the count. People have asked her where the 67 percent figure comes from and she would like to see it in print. She has spent many hours talking with people and collecting signatures and it is a very difficult and demanding and now there are additional signatures required. She still does not understand how many more signatures are needed. Chair/Lin again explained that PWD/Liu previously stated he would like the entire neighborhood contacted and even though there may not be any more signatures collected, everyone is entitled to notification about the proposed project. PWD/Liu said he would move forward with the recommendations OCTOBER 8, 2009 PAGE 3 T&T COMMISSION BY but wanted to make sure that the entire neighborhood was aware of what would take place. On another note, Ms. Goncharov presented articles to staff regarding the noise from Grand Avenue. Mr. Granger asked how long it would take to complete the project. PWD/Liu responded that staff has already contacted its traffic engineering consultants and asked that they provide the City with design proposals for speed cushions for the neighborhood. Those proposals are due next week and he estimated that the design project would take no more than 30 days or so. Whatever design proposal is brought forward will be conveyed to the residents living on the streets. Once the residents approve the concept the plan, it will be finalized for Request for Proposals for the construction phase. The entire process may take up to six (6) months. Staff is working on the project and has the budget to move it forward. Mr. Granger said that the 49 condos were about 20 percent of all of the condo units that were missed. Kevin Clayborn, owner, Clayborn Hair Studio, spoke in regard to Item IV—Parking on Brea Canyon Road for Pepper Tree Shopping Center. He said the street parking is limited in front of his business and did not understand the limitation because there is limited parking in the center. He asked if the City could either eliminate the limitation or extend the time to accommodate his clients. ITEMS FROM STAFF: A. PWD/Liu noted that the number for Street Sweeping Citations was not an accurate number, as Sheriff's staff was back -logged with data entry. Next month's report will reflect the correct numbers. Received and Filed Traffic Enforcement Updates for: Citations: Collisions: Street Sweeping NEW BUSINESS: July, August and July, August and July, August and September 2009 September 2009 September 2009 A. Parking on Brea Canyon Road for Pepper Tree Shopping Center SENee presented staff's report and recommended that the Traffic and Transportation Commission concur with staff to implement expanded parking hours to one-hour parking from 6:00 a.m. until 7:00 p.m. on Brea Canyon Road adjacent to Pepper Tree Shopping Center. In addition, staff would further recommend that the Commission include in its motion the need to retain the "no stopping and no parking" signs between the hours of 7:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. C/Pincher asked how many new spaces would be created on Brea Canyon Road with the additional parking. SENee responded that they are no new OCTOBER 8, 2009 PAGE 4 T&T COMMISSION V spaces proposed. These are existing spaces and expansion of the time period only. C/Pincher asked how many spaces were available and SE/Yee responded that there were four spaces. C/Pincher asked if there was a reason for limiting the parking to one hour for the businesses. SE/Yee said staff discussed this with some of the tenants who said that one hour was sufficient for the types of businesses in the immediate area and would help to cycle a great number of patrons throughout the day. C/Pincher moved, C/Mok seconded, to concur with staff's recommendation to implement expanded parking hours to one-hour parking from 6:00 a.m. until 7:00 p.m. on Brea Canyon Road adjacent to Pepper Tree Shopping Center and to retain the "no stopping and no parking" signs between the hours of 7:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. In addition, the Commission further recommends that staff investigate removal of the bike path immediately south of the northerly parking center driveway to add parking spaces. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Mok, Pincher, VC/House Chair/Lin NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Shay STATUS OF PREVIOUS ACTION ITEMS: SE/Yee spoke about Commission's concern on Grand Avenue with respect to USA Markings which staff has removed. SE/Yee reported that as a result of the NTMP on Cleghorn and Gold Nugget there were residents who expressed concern about traveling northbound on Grand Avenue at Cleghorn and vehicles regarding the pavement markings indicating that the right curbside lane was a right -turn -only into Cleghorn. Staff investigated the matter and observed existing pavement markings and striping that denote the correct vehicular movement. However, some of the pavement markings needed to be replaced and striping needed to be refreshed and the City's maintenance department will perform the work. In response to C/Shay's request that staff look into the possibility of installing signage along Brea Canyon Road relating to speed, the appropriate signage to use on arterial roadways is signage that reads "speed enforced by radar" and staff is working with its traffic consultant to evaluate an appropriate location for placement of the sign(s). VI. ITEMS FROM COMMISSIONERS: VC/House said he noticed potholes in the slurry seal project on Diamond Bar Boulevard at Brea Canyon Road in front of the EV Free Church from sprinklers causing deterioration of the pavement. There is an excessive amount of water on the roadway when the sprinklers are running and felt that the watering could be curtailed OCTOBER 8, 2009 PAGE 5 T&T COMMISSION to mitigate the situation. In addition, he felt the sprinklers should be turned off during repaving. Chair/Lin asked when the traffic signal timing phases begin and end on Diamond Bar Boulevard. SE/Yee said that at the present time there are three different timing plans: a.m. peak, midday and p.m. peak. During the evening the signals run free. Staff is in the process of developing additional timing plans for weekend and off-peak hours as a result of recent upgrades to the controllers which increases the current three timing plans to nine. Chair/Lin suggested that staff consider moving the morning peak traffic to an earlier time due to heavy traffic in the early morning hours. VII. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: A. Diamond Bar TMS/Traffic Signal Interconnect Links — Phase II — AE/Malpica- Perez reported that staff continues to work with the consultant on resolving minor issues with the system. The contractor has completed 65 percent of the interconnect work. Staff expects the project to be completed by November 2009. B. Lycoming Street Rehabilitation Project — SE/Yee stated that the re - reconstruction of Lycoming Street from Lemon Avenue to the easterly City limit project is substantially complete. Staff is currently developing a punch list of final items for the contractor to take care of. C. Industry's Grand Avenue Bridge Widening/Interchange Project — SE/Yee reported that technical studies are being done in preparation for the Environmental document. This is actually two projects: 1) westbound SR60 ramp that will allow traffic to proceed from southbound Grand Avenue directly onto westbound SR60 instead of making a left turn. 2) The bridge widening on Grand Avenue and on-off ramp improvements in the eastbound direction. D. SR57/60 Feasibility Study — SE/Yee stated that in late September staff submitted final comments on the draft technical study and are awaiting a response from metro regarding the project. The City of Industry is also in the process of submitting comments and suggesting recommended changes to the document and D.B. will monitor that activity as well. E. Lemon Avenue On/Off Ramps Project — PWD/Liu reported that staff is still waiting for Caltrans to get back to it with the City's request to complete the construction in two phases. As late as this morning, the project manager sent a request to Caltrans that the parties meet to discuss the possibility of forward movement on the project. F. Residential —Area 5 Slurry Seal Project—AE/Malpica-Perez reported that this project was completed. There are a few punch list items remaining to be taken care of by the contractor so that the City can issue a Certificate of Completion. G. Arterial — Zone 3/Zone 4 Slurry Seal Project (American Recovery Reinvestment Act) —AE/Malpica-Perez stated that demolition began this week at selected curb ramps and sidewalk locations. Replacement of concrete is slated to begin next week. H. Chino Hills Parkway Street Rehab Project — AE/Malpica-Perez said that staff received the draft plans and specifications which are currently under review. Staff anticipates this project going out for bid in February/March 2010. OCTOBER 8, 2009 PAGE 6 T&T COMMISSION PWD/Liu reported that the Cleghorn/Gold Nugget Neighborhood Traffic Management program was covered early by residents and staff during the Public Comment portion of tonight's meeting. VIII. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE CITY EVENTS: As stated in the agenda. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to come before the Traffic and Transportation Commission, Chair/Lin adjourned the meeting at 8:02 p.m. The foregoing minutes are hereby approved this day of Respectfully, David G. Liu, Secretary Attest: Chairman Jimmy Lin 2010. WALNUT/DIAMOND BAR STATION TRAFFIC STATISTICS OCTOBER, NOVEMBER, & DECEMBER 2009 Report Completed: JANUARY 2010 Oct -09 Nov-09 ❑ Non-Haz 0 Hazard m Parker ■ Total *Dec -09 Totals reflect pre -approved Deputy Vacation time used in December Oct -08 Nov -08 Dec -08 ❑ Non-Haz ■ Hazard M Parker ■ Total Oct -09 j3] 33 4 Nov -09 Dec -09 OINJURY 0NON INJ ■TOTAL OCTOBER 2009 D.U.I ARREST= 2 D.U.I. COLLISIONS= 1 NOVEMBER 2009 D.U.I ARREST= 2 D.U.I. COLLISIONS= 1 DECEMBER 2009 D.U.I ARREST= 5 D.U.I. COLLISIONS= 1 I r A I Imil Oct-08 Nov -08 Dec -08 ■INJURY 13 NON INJ ■TOTAL OCTOBER 2008 D.U.I ARREST= 0 D.U.I. COLLISIONS= 0 NOVEMBER 2008 D.U.I ARREST= 1 D.U.I. COLLISIONS= 0 1 FATAL ACCIDENT DECEMBER 2008 D.U.I ARREST= 0 D.U.I. COLLISIONS= 0 IST4mlk' *Nov -09 Dec -09 * Total reflects pre -approved vacation time used in November Oct -08 Nov -08 Dec -08 ------------------------------ ---- - CITY OF DIAMOND BAR TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEMORANDUM ------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE: January 4, 2010 MEETING DATE: January 14, 1010 TO: Chair and Members of the Traffic and Transportation Commission VIA: David G. Liu, Director of Public Works/City Engineer FROM: Kimberly Molina, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: Palomino Drive Neighborhood Traffic Management Program Update BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: In August of 2006 the City received a request to install speed humps along Palomino Drive due to concerns with speeding along the roadway. In accordance with the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (NTMP) guidelines a petition/request from 51% or 41 households along Palomino Drive is needed to begin the NTMP. The initial requestor was able to obtain the 51% required and the NTMP process began. The program was introduced to the neighborhood on June 28, 2007 in which approximately 17 residents were present. At that meeting it was decided by those in attendance that the entire Palomino Drive neighborhood including all residential roadways that branch off of Palomino Drive should be included in the study for potential traffic calming devices. The neighborhood that was included in the study is shown as Exhibit A as well as the locations where staff collected speed and volume data. Traffic speed and volume counts were first collected in July 2007 over a four-day period (Thursday through Sunday) which indicated some speeding and volume issues throughout the neighborhood. (Refer to Exhibit B which identifies the July 2007 speed and volume counts in purple.) Due to the fact that school was not in session during the July counts staff decided to take a second set of traffic and volume counts in October 2007 to obtain an accurate analysis of the conditions within the neighborhood. (Refer to Exhibit B which identifies the October 2007 speed and volume counts in orange.) The second set of counts from October reinforced the apparent speeding and volume conditions indicated in the July counts. Palomino Drive is a residential roadway with a 25 MPH speed limit. Counts indicated an average 85 percentile speed between 30 and 35 MPH. On December 10, 2007 staff held the second meeting for the neighborhood which presented the results of the speed and volume counts as well as a conceptual plan of devices proposed to be installed within the neighborhood. Approximately 30 residents were in attendance at the second meeting. After discussion of the proposed concept with those in attendance a petition was re -circulated through the neighborhood, by the "team captain" to obtain the required 67% in favor of proceeding with the actual plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E package) of the concept. Of the 238 parcels that are within the neighborhood, one signature from 160 parcels was required to meet the 67% in favor of proceeding to the next step in the NTMP. Signatures from 204 lots were obtained for a total of 85.7% in favor with proceeding with the PS&E package of the concept plan. Staff began design of the final plans in April 2008 which were presented at a third meeting with the neighborhood in August. These plans identified the locations of the speed cushions, raised crosswalks and small median islands there were to be constructed as shown in Exhibit C. With the resident's support of the final design, a construction contract was awarded in October 2008 and construction of the traffic calming tools was completed in January 2009. To determine the effectiveness of the traffic calming measures, a follow-up set of speed and volume counts are collected 6 months after the construction was completed. Due to the fact that the 6 -month counts for this neighborhood would have been collected in summertime when school is not in session, staff postponed taking counts until October 2009 (Refer to Exhibit B which identifies the October 2009 counts in Blue) which provide a direct comparison with the October 2007 data. Staff was pleased to find that the results are extremely favorable. The data indicates that volume and the 85 percentile speed have decreased by as much as 241 vehicles and 12 mph directly in front of Golden Springs Elementary School along Ballena (Refer ( to Volume and Speed differences as shown in green on Exhibit B). However, the decrease in vehicles traveling along Ballena may have shifted some traffic to Platina as can be seen in the increase of northbound traffic along this roadway. Even with the increase in northbound traffic along Platina, the 85 percentile speeds along Platina indicated a decrease by as much as 11 mph. While the program wasn't able to reduce the northbound cut -through traffic along Platina, we were able to reduce the traffic volume along Ballena at the elementary school frontage, which ultimately aids in the reduction of school traffic congestion. The greatest concern of speeding and cut -through traffic, as indicated by the residents at the meetings, was along Palomino. Staff collected data from 5 locations along this roadway. Faulty data collected at 23565 Palomino Drive prohibits us from determining any actual reduction in volumes at this location; however data collected at 23654 Palomino Drive indicated reductions in volume by as much as 417 vehicles which would also indicate that there was also a decrease in volume at 23565 Palomino Drive. Speeds at 23565 Palomino Drive indicate a slight increase; however it remains within tolerances at 30 mph while speeds as you travel towards 23654 Palomino Drive indicate a reduction in speed by as much as 15 mph. Data collected at 24023 and 24129 Palomino Drive indicated some increase in volumes as can be seen in Exhibit A, but this traffic is clearly residential traffic and cannot be contributed to cut -through traffic. Speeds at these locations also indicate decreases. Overall, the 6 -month follow up traffic data indicates that the traffic calming measures that were designed and installed within the Palomino Drive Neighborhood have been effective at slowing down overall traffic within the neighborhood and in many cases have been able to deter cut -through traffic from traveling along the residential roadways. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Traffic and Transportation Commission receive and file the report by staff regarding the results of the Palomino Drive Neighborhood Traffic Management Program 1.7 1*64 f' sJ i fi s F T�I. ?'V�k ` 1; ' ApryRlt t Mjygi; I� y .. R ; kr,.r"�k-L'•" .PrE, �i" 'y^ 'rYl �}�A,4�„ rM�\ ; 1^YA sj'� ri►` .-may 1 ♦i �. � ��f. � i� t P y rim 'J�''� �' ���'.�{y �\'�-��,�-�,,�,�"q"•+f yir. .'mow• � ,:: - i o y W f, Z-r ••: V �,, � � A \ ^YT .1 f f �y.1 �r � � /�\ � .ate �� �a��'f O � i - :� x��4 °t ✓ 1V �� w i � Vth N 1 r Y � �� °7�[� '� il�_`� '� -f y�M N�� a►£. �I��"��Y o;!` g", �`,�. `� � �� , ` � r +.� c,14 v- y- V r°�'.J ,e®. ,.. , i i - {�? �ci y� V ,y'�as.''• , 40 !f a qa "; I;. S a1'�.1, s, •oda e . t'� ti ort •T 40 Y � T wry'` a f Palomino Drive NTMP Results December 2009 Exhibit B Before Volume 7107 Before Volume 10/07 School Difference (Volume) After Volume 10/09 NTMP Difference (Volume) Before 85th %Speed 7/07 Before 85th %Speed 10/07 School Difference (Speed) After 85th % Speed 10/09 NTMP Difference (Speed) 242 Ballena Drive Thursday Northbound 426 668 242 512 -156 302:0 30 0 20 -10 Southbound 511 890 379 731 -159 32 29 -3 19 -10 Friday Northbound 473 716 243 555 -161 31 31 0 19 -12 Southbound 565 963 398 759 -204 32 30 -2 19 -11 Saturday Northbound 425 476 51 329 -147 30 33 3 23 -10 Southbound 511 605 94 411 -194 32 32 0 22 -10 Sunday Northbound 349 406 57 201 -205 31 33 2 24 -9 Southbound 458 528 70 287 -241 32 32 0 23 -9 Before Volume 7/07 Before Volume 10/07 School Difference (Volume) After Volume 10109 NTMP Difference (Volume) Before 85th %Speed 7107 Before 85th %Speed 10/07 School Difference (Speed) After 85th %Speed 10/09 NTMP Difference (Speed) 267 Platina Drive Thursday Northbound 54B 768 220 824 56 32 30 -2 23 -7 Southbound 359 488 129 357 -131 33 30 -3 21 -9 Friday Northbound 587 773 186 886 113 33 30 -3 22 -8 Southbound 348 517 169 403 -114 34 30 -4 20 -10 Saturday Northbound 522 509 -13 647 138 31 30 -1 20 -10 Southbound 369 371 2 404 33 32 31 -1 21 -10 Sunday Northbound 435 462 27 399 -63 32 30 -2 23 -7 Southbound 295 337 42 269 -68 33 32 -1 21 -11 Palomino Drive NTMP Results December 2009 Exhibit B Before Volume 7/07 Before Volume 10/07 School Difference (Volume) After Volume 10/09 NTMP Difference (Volume) Before 85th % Speed 7/07 Before 85th % Speed 10/07 School Difference (Speed) After 85th %Speed 10/09 NTMP Difference (Speed) 23565 Palomino Drive Eastbound *Faulty Data 1277 *Faulty Results 913 -364 *Faulty Data 35 *Faulty Results 22 -13 Thursday Eastbound 1203 1330 127 1057 -273 26 25 -1 30 5 Friday Westbound 1203 1471 268 1194 -277 26 28 2 30 2 Friday Eastbound 1233 1350 117 1276 -74 26 24 -2 30 6 Saturday Westbound 1233 1452 219 1342 -110 26 28 2 30 2 Saturday Eastbound 1337 1363 26 1187 -176 26 25 -1 30 5 Sunday Westbound 1337 1120 -217 1258 138 26 35 9 30 -5 Sunday Eastbound 1069 1339 270 845 -494 26 25 -1 30 5 Westbound 1069 1019 -50 834 -185 26 29 3 30 Before Volume 7/07 Before Volume 10/07 School Difference (Volume) After Volume 10/09 NTMP Difference (Volume) Before 85th %Speed 7/07 Before 85th %Speed 10/07 School Difference (Speed) After 85th %Speed 10/09 NTMP Difference (Speed) 23654 Palomino Drive Thursday Eastbound 1079 1277 198 913 -364 37 35 -2 22 -13 Westbound 1172 1386 214 1107 -279 35 38 3 23 -15 Friday Eastbound 1122 1438 316 1087 -351 37 35 -2 21 -14 Westbound 1208 1479 271 1301 -178 35 38 3 24 -14 Saturday Eastbound 1181 1254 73 991 -263 36 34 -2 21 -13 Westbound 1182 1188 6 1178 -10 35 36 1 23 -13 Sunday Eastbound 983 1119 136 702 -417 36 35 -1 22 -13 Westbound 952 1045 93 763 -282 35 38 3 24 -14 Before Volume 7/07 Before Volume 10/07 School Difference (Volume) After Volume 10/09 NTMP Difference (Volume) Before 85th % Speed 7/07 Before 85th % Speed 10/07 School Difference (Speed) After 85th % Speed 10/09 NTMP Difference (Speed) 23735 Palomino Drive Thursday Eastbound 723 826 103 650 -176 35 35 0 25 -10 Westbound 620 961 341 579 -382 37 34 -3 27 -7 Friday Eastbound 793 902 109 765 -137 36 35 -1 25 -10 Westbound 671 1050 379 641 -409 36 33 -3 27 -6 Saturday Eastbound 751 625 -126 585 -40 35 37 2 24 -13 Westbound 627 749 122 509 -240 35 33 -2 25 -8 Sunday Eastbound 648 593 -55 390 -203 35 35 0 25 -10 Westbound 534 718 184 323 -395 35 33 -2 26 -7 Exhibit B Before jl Volume 7/07 Speed) After 85th % Speed 10109 NTMP Difference (Speed) 24129 Palomino Drive 24023 Palomino Drive Thursday Thursday Eastbound 15 21 -11 Westbound 90 Westbound 184 2$ -7 124 Friday Eastbound 153 20 -13 29 1 Westbound 196 23 -7 -2 Saturday Eastbound 157 20 -13 Sunday Eastbound Westbound 180 21 -12 Westbound Sunday Eastbound 128 20 -13 Westbound 141 21 -10 Before ;I Volume 7/07 Speed) After 85th % Speed 10109 NTMP Difference (Speed) 24129 Palomino Drive Thursday Eastbound 102 49 -1 Westbound 90 Y7 -1 Friday Eastbound 124 26 -4 Westbound 84 29 1 Saturday Eastbound 105 27 -2 Westbound 82 27 -1 Sunday Eastbound 77 27 -3 Westbound 63 Y6 -2 s1 a F � ��� � V ♦ • \ Y 1 j�j T.MP k *,y ♦ ���. rjY3y, v . 1,•►. '6 a+ C N N N i0 O In 41 N Q 0 O r •e • C y v W $ v iI - ` `4.i' a. -' -4 h'' !• t�A U: AWS iP I j ; fi r 10 piu F r� �11i F1 \ .!rte \ A•N " n, .K f. ice. �1: Vii.. �j#\ i`Y vr����i 4 -� • a.. " ..; .�. •'. � tit,� 1 � IVY7 1, r . _• # 'i Y`. �y' \,�� 'r=\fit .r Jr� � � \\\\Y��' .•'law,• •. *1" An ilt- W '.Y.: �: •..t -r {k,: rY`r�_ h -' i y� �,sy ' ��'� �l'�v � q � �r W y�l •.\ .w 0 f�f,KG df .T� _a .wv .i m !•/fir .y !' S-,\ o�•. v `it .J � �. • { ARS _mor • ' �; v mx+ rv'�t t y V lii J� ____ t� �},i:•' \� —T«� _. _- t V�,�""-M1aws�'^�`e`i��`�1`__. ' .' I ;:� y` ' yRl O 0 N d- L m D c c� Z-% ca 2 El VA s +O+ E O L CL s CL v 2 � O O- O N 4.0 O tm N d O r w dto CD !. O N N N N Co _ a 3) VIII 500 3 El I 3 E C M N ralow -: +`` 1 4� .. AAS _, • �. y M R Av C N C is • 4 N N rd O 4 �+ I «e" • r .` ° \ e � .�A l+�ra �� d p� �! � I W V ^�� O U L `Y.a 00 �IA M . �, a " s` + . �1.;, 4 .i1 •�/ Fri' y fill, �+ . �d ^\ g,�'�N'""� a �AA..�� �•� . ��.5 •. �� ". - �• 1 � .a `� °�-F� � � �� '�A, �� ' � ?"� ` fl a ,�i •* • a9l�,j � A � 6° a',��18\� �' � • `{¢• a -�.�> w ft- � ' �, v 1, +o ,f�'�_, A }- ASF+� • `I .d.. p. +'`j���+/! ~"�W'qb ? ' `�� ♦ t� 'YAM + � ` �a 'TJ •b r • J.+`+ ik ,+.T+�•+�� \• r L �i ". •� f\ .�. At A `.Y P,- , 1 •..�. Pa(y� � •. `�1 t�"..�-'•((... \ �Ai ,v'" y'1 is rL �\�.j�yy 'Y r It r�. � +,., • ;, av+ \ '�°tib \ + y . F '��."'' -, �S � if��'; � �. �.' t P,t'a M{ �.,y�� ,�.,} •fir � � '.A�, .A',® �AR��.Y •F .l. �+ P / ,. .�F •'7-° + a YY' �Y +�; to M � � ,. ti� ' J • ^i d�, .V •i � td� �:. s , > � t t A0. sJk t It 20 E Ao ca f. dr � � a ,• ��� r � r 7, � Vim, l j +.Y x �. - %��� •, FAi IL ' jdl,��� y.r \\�q v�.�. ��j �1 i, IS•s>>7•Q1 �Y �.� 1 �/���•' `y'�..;t-„y.. 41 Al Ic �-tl �. fi qj �kj5` • i .w �t �'"irys`��.1}jT,�1',•^ �� �`i , .. � r� ../: �•ti �� ` >tti •Y � �: -. �W �- it t`.. Y�-''��i .' ��+.�t t ► .�► rR ,� � w .: �a � •�! to •'� l ,� 1 '��.' �•!. • , (� , , a ' • 5{��' i °t 7 •3 , jF�' f LL T,�.N �' 9 G La ac)C 70 0 0 L L I L O ti w L d (: ) O O p r O N O r CL M M M M M M M M m co U) r 0 t y O M M M C4 m n M M M M m coM r M M M co Z > B / 0J 0) E W N O CD m Q 7 O O w co co co O le OD v 01 co co N 0) cc E L 7 N N CM O (DD r N N V O N r < < ' > N 0 E p 00 00 M h M00 �O) ' p OT 'V n N 0 M 7 M O r 00 O h 00 N O N N d o O 0 n N LO M 00 p M O Cl) v N m > 'O U U _6 C C C C C C C C 7 O 7 C 7 :3 3 7 O O O O O O O O 9 s s n n _o s L L t C L w Z U) Z (D Z u) Z 0 N C a m a a " a m � m s N ❑ 1— LL 0 co L I o 67 Q O y Qp N N M N r N 7 N r N M N N N N N r 00 d o c a _ N CV M N co N r T,' co L) _ 0 d ) O (1) , m cm to 00 7 to to tv M Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) m 00 N r e O y p t, Cl) N M t` Cl) to M f0 M U* M t0 M N M m 00 V a 5 N c 0) E_ w v T ti r N M h Cl) to O t\ r N 00 F 0) M N M r N r -IT N Z 6 0) 0) En O O ~ r CD r coB N M Q O r O r M r T r r h ti ;� 0) OC E E O t 0) 00 T d' W m t0 Cl) C1 6 w 0 r N M N N r U) w O) Er, cu m to v m w w O O ti M f` N 00 r 7 �O N M M d' N r r O m O� r r r r r r r r > O E n M N N 00 r N Cl) N �O O n O r N r O N 00 r co r 00 O to [A m O n r r r r r r C a C C C a C a C C a C 7 O O O 7 O O O 7 O O O 7 O :3 O U) N N N N N N N W W W ?j W O m `rE m aco a a LO 0 Nao ti ti ci L E 0 O E EF I 0) a ca O T h O < O M < OO O T h Z yy..(.D.� (n B a m N N Q as+ Qp < N N N N N N 00 N d �a 0 y O M < M N N p N y_ 0 d) h Q t c 0 �n r) M h M M 4) a+ Q p � �"� c�i i�� 07 M Cl) m M Cl) M W T 00 ULO �h M M Cl) M M M M M m 0 N ~ 00 O) 0 c wN h Cil O M w r M < et N N M Z > 0 O1 O 0 h w 0 Ln M M Q O d '50 t C Cl) O co N N N tl 7 p T d' M T 1, M 0000 C E o co T NN a)M CO y O ONO m OOf O (A cA R 0 h m 0 < 0) 47 h 7 0 M N O N11 M T h < 0 h N 00 V 7 M y O n h (D c0 h c0 w0 m � 7 n 7 :3 7 :3 7 4 -0 - Q -a 4 ?j W W W W 0 c .� I'' Lo ? a co a m a h ° Cl) a w a M ci E _ E Z2cu/ Q / / ■ PAI �_ & § 5 ( w / / § { 2 )Q 0 / \§CD V) 0 0 N C-4 C14 (14 (14C14C4 N \ k7 � , , - , Cl) 04 � U) 92 kU) �cliC)k co Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl)Cl) n Cl) m 2 k�k� R R R Cl) n n m a &/ 2§ & kk § m , n _ Cl)# - © „ z po 5> { 6§ 2) § E 2 2 s g ■ 0 (D _ ® & f 9 U - s 2 , © §§ § 01CD , m m a k k§ 3 m 2 - - - / \ / ) / \ ) ) ] ) 04 3 { \ m 6 e ( § CO 0 a) CD O c OJ a =a PE y Z_ (� L e a 0) O c N p N N N N N N N W N r dr o c a C) t o e a n o y o 0 00 0 00 am 00 0 00 r Q O M N M N N N M N M 00 V% r 0 O t O) O N N M N N N N N ++ h m W 0) a c d 7 r N le M LO r N O T Z � O 0 / 0) CD a) Or 0 Q .21 O O 00 0) M w O (f f) N O N£ h O N 00T N w N W r n N ' U)� N h O E 00 in <-1 cf) M CD M O LO O W h 4) 0.l Imo- M n f0 m ; V ": (1) 01 0 ca -a C u c ca O O N • O U v O . c� m co O s ?� ca O Cc Lm 'a ■ >s� OL M�1 01 yam... •V) mc '� z � Lm CL a) O s O a) 3 LM O = O0 as•+ L L mc MC .3 mom+ ma U) Z V O �••i O ; � Q .0 ai •- > ai E O (D .. ..E 0 O a O m >