Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/16/2013LAdMunu City Council Agenda Tuesday, July 16, 2013 6:30 p.m. - Regular Meeting Diamond Bar City Hall Windmill Room, First Floor 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Jack Tanaka Ron Everett Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Ling -Ling Chang Carol Herrera Steve Tye Council Member Council Member Council Member City Manager James DeStefano City Attorney David DeBerry City Clerk Tommye Cribbins Copies of staff reports or other written documentation relating to agenda items are on file in the Office of the City Clerk; and are available for public inspection. If you have questions regarding an agenda item, please contact the City Clerk at (909) 839-7010 during regular business hours. In an effort to comply with the requirements of Title 11 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the City of Diamond Bar requires that any person in need of any type of special equipment, assistance or accommodation(s) in order to communicate at a City public meeting, must inform the City Clerk a minimum of 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting. Have online access? City Council Agendas are now available on the City of Diamond Bar's web site at www.CityofDiamondBar.com Please refrain from smoking, eating or drinking in the Council Chambers. The City of Diamond Bar uses recycled paper and encourages you to do the same. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA July 16, 2013 CALL TO ORDER: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: INVOCATION: ROLL CALL: APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Next Resolution No. 2013-19 Next Ordinance No. 05(2013) 6:30 p.m. Mayor Pastor Jeanne Favreau-Sorvillo, Diamond Bar United Church of Christ Council Members Chang, Herrera, Tye, Mayor Pro Tem Everett, Mayor Tanaka Mayor 1. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATES, PROCLAMATIONS: 1.1 Presentation of Certificate of Recognition to Jane Taylor Chief Executive Officer of the YMCA of Pomona Valley upon her retirement. 1.2 Presentation of Certificates of Recognition to Deputy Danta Moore, Deputy Franklin Novelo, and Deputy Ray Huang for the apprehension of an Armed Robbery Suspect on June 23, 2013. 1.3 Presentation of Certificates of Recognition to the Sheriff Booster Variety Show Volunteers. Written materials distributed to the City Council within 72 hours of the City Council meeting are available for public inspection immediately upon distribution in the City Clerk's Office at 21810 Copley Dr., Diamond Bar, California, during normal business hours. July 16, 2013 PAGE 2 NEW BUSINESS OF THE MONTH: 1.4 Presentation of Certificate Plaque to Hot Dog Pops, 808 North Diamond Bar Boulevard, as New Business of the Month, July, 2013. 2. CITY MANAGER REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS: "Public Comments" is the time reserved on each regular meeting agenda to provide an opportunity for members of the public to directly address the Council on Consent Calendar items or matters of interest to the public that are not already scheduled for consideration on this agenda. Although the City Council values your comments, pursuant to the Brown Act, the Council generally cannot take any action on items not listed on the posted agenda. Please complete a Speaker's Card and give it to the City Clerk (completion of this form is voluntary). There is a five-minute maximum time limit when addressing the City Council. 4. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC COMMENT: Under the Brown Act, members of the City Council may briefly respond to public comments but no extended discussion and no action on such matters may take place. 5. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: 5.1 Concerts in the Park — July 17, 2013 - 6:30 p.m. to 8:00 p.m., The Ravelers (Rock n'Roll), Sycamore Canyon Park, 22930 Golden Springs Drive. 5.2 Movies Under the Stars — July 17, 2013 — Madagascar 3 - Immediately following Concerts in the Park, Sycamore Canyon Park, 22930 Golden Springs Drive. 5.3 Planning Commission Meeting — July 23, 2013 — 7:00 p.m., Windmill Community Room, 21810 Copley Drive. 5.4 Concerts in the Park — July 24, 2013 - 6:30 p.m. to 8:00 p.m., The Answer (Classic Rock), Sycamore Canyon Park, 22930 Golden Springs Drive. 5.5 Movies Under the Stars — July 24, 2013 — Brave - Immediately following Concerts in the Park, Sycamore Canyon Park, 22930 Golden Springs Drive. 5.6 Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting — July 25, 2013 - 7:00 p.m., Windmill Community Room, 21810 Copley Drive. 5.7 Concerts in the Park — July 31, 2013 - 6:30 p.m. to 8:00 p.m., Upstream (Caribbean), Sycamore Canyon Park, 22930 Golden Springs Drive. July 16, 2013 PAGE 3 5.8 Movies Under the Stars - July 31, 2013 - Jumanji -Immediately following Concerts in the Park, Sycamore Canyon Park, 22930 Golden Springs Drive. 5.9 City Council Meeting - August 6, 2013 - 6:30 p.m., Windmill Community Room, 21810 Copley Drive. 6. CONSENT CALENDAR: 6.1 City Council Minutes - Regular Meeting of June 18, 2013 - Approve as submitted. 6.2 Planning Commission Minutes - Regular Meeting Minutes of May 28, 2013 - Receive and File. 6.3 Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes - Regular Meeting Minutes of April 25, 2013 - Receive and File. 6.4 Ratification of Check Register - Dated June 13, 2013 through July 10, 2013 totaling $ 1,690,913.92. Requested by: Finance Department 6.5 Treasurer's Statement - May 2013. Recommended Action: Approve. Requested by: Finance Department 6.6 Approval of Second Reading by Title Only and Adopt Ordinance No. OX (2013): Approving a Development Code Amendment (Planning Case No. PL2013-022) to Revise Tables 2-5 and 2-6 of Section 22.10.030 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code. (150' Distance Requirement between Service Stations with alcohol sales and elementary, middle and high schools). Recommended Action: Approve and Adopt. Requested by: Community Development Department 6.7 Adopt Resolution No. 2013 -XX: Consenting to the Inclusion of Properties within the City's Jurisdiction in the California Hero Program to Finance Distributed Generation Renewable Energy Sources, Energy and Water Efficiency Improvements and Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure and Approving the Amendment to a Certain Joint Powers Agreement Related Thereto. July 16, 2013 PAGE 4 Recommended Action: Adopt and Authorize. Requested by: City Manager 6.8 Approval of Extension of City -Wide Graffiti Removal Contract with Graffiti Control Systems for Fiscal Year 2013-14 in the Amount Not to Exceed $59,280. Recommended Action: Approve. Requested by: Community Development Department 6.9 Authorize the City Manager to Approve Amendment No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with SJC 3 Consultants in the Amount of $30,000 to Administer the City's Home Improvement Program (HIP) for FY 2013-14. Recommended Action: Authorize. Requested by: City Manager 6.10 (a) Approval of Contract Amendment No. 1 with Alameda Corridor - East (ACE) Construction Authority Regarding the Construction of Fairway Drive Grade Separation Project. Recommended Action: Approve. (b) Approval of Contract Amendment No. 3 with KOA Corporation to Provide Traffic Engineering Service for Alameda Corridor -East Construction Authority's (ACE) Fairway Drive Grade Separation Project in the Amount of $21,390. Recommended Action: Approve. Requested by: Public Works Department 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 6:45 p.m., or as soon thereafter as matters may be heard. 7.1 Lighting and Landscape Districts 38, 39 and 41. (a) Adopt Resolution No. 2013 -XX: Levying an Assessment on Landscaping Assessment District No. 38 for Fiscal Year 2013-14 (b) Adopt Resolution No. 2013 -XX: Levying an Assessment on Landscaping Assessment District No. 39 for Fiscal Year 2013-14. July 16, 2013 PAGE 5 (c) Adopt Resolution No. 2013 -XX: Levying an Assessment on Landscaping Assessment District No. 41 for Fiscal Year 2013-14. Recommended Action: Receive Staff's Presentation; Open the Public Hearing; Receive Testimony; Close the Public Hearing and Adopt (a) Resolution No. 2013 -XX (District 38); (b) Resolution No. 2013 -XX (District No. 39) and (c) Resolution No. 2013 -XX (District 41). Requested by: Public Works Department 7.2 Tentative Parcel Map No. 72067, Development Review and Parking Permit (Planning Case No. PL2012-455 (2 Story Office Complex located at 650 Brea Canyon Road). Recommended Action: Receive Staff Report, Open the Public Hearing, Receive Testimony; Close the Public Hearing and Adopt: (1) Adopt Resolution No. 2013 -XX: Adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Approving Tentative Tract Map No. 72067 (Planning Case No. PL2012-455) to Subdivide Air Space for an 11 -Unit Office Condominium Located at 650 Brea Canyon Road, Diamond Bar, CA 91789 (Assessor's Parcel No. 8719-010-901; (2) Adopt Resolution No. 2013 -XX: Approving Development Review to Construct a 21,794 Square -Foot, New Two Story Professional Office Building and a Parking Permit to Share Driveway Access and Parking between the Proposed Development and the Lot to the North of the Project Site (Planning Case No. PL2012-455) Located at 650 Brea Canyon Road (Assessor's Parcel No. 8719-010-901). Requested by: Community Development Department 8. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: None. 9. COUNCIL SUB -COMMITTEE REPORTS AND MEETING ATTENDANCE REPORTS/COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS: 10. ADJOURNMENT: Agenda No. 6.1 MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND D d L�y JUNE 18, 2013 CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Jack Tanaka called the Regular City Council meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. in the South Coast Air Quality Management District Auditorium, 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Tanaka led the Pledge of Allegiance. INVOCATION: Joseph Valenzuela, Jr. High Pastor, Diamond Canyon Christian Church, gave the invocation. ROLL CALL: Council Member Chang, Herrera, Tye, Mayor Pro Tem Everett and Mayor Tanaka. Staff Present: James DeStefano, City Manager; David Doyle, Assistant City Manager; Omar Sandoval, Assistant City Attorney; Ken Desforges, IT Director; Bob Rose, Community Services Director; Greg Gubman, Community Development Director; Ryan McLean, Assistant to the City Manager; Grace Lee, Senior Planner; Kimberly Young, Associate Engineer; Anthony Santos, Senior Management Analyst; Christian Perez, Associate Engineer; Cecilia Arellano, Public Information Coordinator, and Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: M/Tanaka requested that Consent Calendar Item 6.11 be continued to July 16, 2013. 1. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATES, PROCLAMATIONS: 1.1 MPT/Everett proclaimed July 2013 as Parks and Recreation Month and presented the Proclamation to Parks and Recreation Chairman Dave Grundy. NEW BUSINESS OF THE MONTH: 1.2 M/Tanaka presented a Certificate Plaque to Ali Abdullah, owner of the Diamond Fresh Farmers Market, 21168 Golden Springs Drive, New Business of the Month for June 2013. 2. CITY MANAGER REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: CM/DeStefano reported that earlier today, the LA County Board of Supervisors approved an agreement between two County Departments that will allow for the transfer of the former library location at 1061 Grand Avenue to the Fire District allowing the current fire station on Grand Avenue to expand and offer a variety of additional services to members of the Fire Department. This facility is currently used as a training location as well as other needs that service the Department and the City of DB. More importantly, the property will remain within the County profile and an asset of the Fire Department and an overall betterment to the community. This was an effort that has been underway since the City was involved in relocating the library to the new facility at City Hall. CM/DeStefano JUNE 18, 2013 PAGE 2 CITY COUNCIL 3. a thanked Librarian Margaret Donnellan Todd, Chief Daryl Osby, Dave Stone and Supervisor Don Knabe for their help in this effort. CM/DeStefano also announced that the library sign that the Friends of the Library donated several years ago will remain operational and used to provide public service messaging for the library and the Fire Department. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Nancy Lyons, 22536 Ridgeline Road, spoke about Diamond Bar Day at the Fair on Thursday, September 5. She reported that the fair offers "no charge" field trips for elementary school students and that with enough contributions to the Big Yellow Bus Program, DB students would receive transportation to the Fair at no charge. Ms. Lyons also announced that individuals who plan to attend the DB Day at the Fair can purchase a ticket on-line for only $5 and that, the $5 will go to the Big Yellow Bus Program. She asked Council if a link could be put on the City's website. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC COMMENTS: None Offered. 5. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: 5.1 Planning Commission Meeting — June 25, 2013 — 7:00 p.m., Windmill Community Room, 21810 Copley Drive. 5.2 Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting — June 27, 2013 — 7:00 p.m., Windmill Community Room, 21810 Copley Drive. 5.3 City Council Meeting — July 2, 2013 — canceled. 5.4 Independence Day Holiday — July 4, 2013 — City Offices closed in observance of the 4th of July. City Offices reopen Friday, July 5, 2013 at 7:30 a.m. 5.5 Planning Commission Meeting — July 9, 2013 — 7:00 p.m., Windmill Community Room, 21810 Copley Drive. 5.6 Concerts in the Park — July 10, 2013 — 6:30 p.m. to 8:00 p.m., Bumptown (Latin) Sycamore Canyon Park, 22930 Golden Springs Drive. 5.7 Movies Under the Stars — July 10, 2013 — Hotel Transylvania — Immediately following, Concerts in the Park, Sycamore Canyon Park, 22930 Golden Springs Drive. 5.8 Traffic and Transportation Commission Meeting — July 11, 2013 — 7:00 p.m., Windmill Community Room, 21810 Copley Drive. JUNE 18, 2013 PAGE 3 CITY COUNCIL 5.9 Due to remodeling of the South Coast Air Quality Management District Auditorium, during the months of July, August and September 2013, City Council Meetings will be held in the Windmill Community Room located on the First Floor of City Hall, 21810 Copley Drive. Rebroadcasting of Council meetings will be televised on Time Warner Channel 3 and Verizon FIOS Television Channel 47. 5.10 City Council Meeting — July 16, 2013 - 6:30 p.m., Windmill Community Room, 21810 Copley Drive. 6. CONSENT CALENDAR: C/Herrera moved, MPT/Everett seconded, to approve the Consent Calendar with the exception of Item 6.11 which was continued to July 16, 2013. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Chang, Herrera, Tye, MPT/Everett M/Tanaka NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None 6.1 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — Regular Meeting of June 4, 2013 — Approved as submitted. 6.2 RECEIVED AND FILED TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MINUTES: (a) Regular Meeting of February 14, 2013 (b) Regular Meeting of April 11, 2013 6.3 RECEIVED AND FILED PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES — Regular Meeting of May 14, 2013. 6.4 RATIFIED CHECK REGISTER — Dated May 30, 2013 through June 12, 2013 totaling $400,487.98. 6.5 APPROVED SECOND READING AND ADOPTED ORDINANCE NO. 04 (2013): AMENDING TITLE 22 OF THE DIAMOND BAR MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION REGARDING EMERGENCY SHELTERS, TRANSITIONAL AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSING, SINGLE ROOM OCCUPANCY HOUSING AND DENSITY BONUSES. 6.6 LANDSCAPE DISTRICT NUMBERS 38, 39 AND 41: a) ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2013-16: DECLARING THE CITY'S INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS FOR LANDSCAPE DISTRICT NO. 38 AND DIRECTED THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE THE PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL AT ITS JULY 16, 2013 REGULAR MEETING. JUNE 18, 2013 PAGE 4 CITY COUNCIL b) ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2013-17: DECLARING THE CITY'S INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS FOR LANDSCAPE DISTRICT NO. 39 AND DIRECTED THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE THE PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL AT ITS JULY 16, 2013 REGULAR MEETING. c) ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2013-18: DECLARING THE CITY'S INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS FOR LANDSCAPE DISTRICT NO. 41 AND DIRECTED THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE THE PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL AT ITS JULY 16, 2013 REGULAR MEETING. 6.7 APPROVED EXTENSION OF CONTRACT AGREEMENT WITH HARDY & HARPER, INC. FOR THREE YEARS (FY 2013-14, FY 2014-15 AND FY 2015-16) FOR ON-CALL STREET MAINTENANCE SERVICES SPECIFIC TO ROAD PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, CURB & GUTTER, AND STRIPING MAINTENANCE. 6.8 APPROVED CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 1 WITH SIEMENS INDUSTRY, INC. (FORMERLY REPUBLIC ITS) FOR A THREE-YEAR EXTENSION FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEARS FY 2013-14, FY 2014-15 AND FY 2015-16). 6.9 APPROVED A CONTRACT AMENDMENT WITH SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY (SEMCO) EXTENDING THE CONTRACT TERM THROUGH JUNE 30, 2014 AT A COST OF $44,000 FOR A TOTAL NOT -TO -EXCEED CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $126,500. 6.10 APPROVED CONTRACT EXTENSIONS FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT: a) APPROVED AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO THE AGREEMENT WITH TENNIS ANYONE TO EXTEND THE CONTRACT PERIOD FROM JULY 1, 2013 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2014 IN THE AMOUNT OF $56,000. b) AUTHORIZED THE CITY MANAGER TO EXTEND VENDOR SERVICES FOR SENIOR AND ADULT EXCURSIONS PROVIDED BY INLAND EMPIRE STAGES LIMITED, IN AN AMOUNT NOT -TO - EXCEED $70,000 FOR 2013-14 FISCAL YEAR. c) APPROVED AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE AGREEMENT WITH ACCESS CONTROL SECURITY TO EXTEND THE CONTRACT PERIOD TO JULY 1, 2013 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2014 IN AN AMOUNT NOT -TO -EXCEED $30,000. JUNE 18, 2013 PAGE 5 CITY COUNCIL d) APPROVED AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO AGREEMENT WITH AND 1 OFFICIALS TO EXTEND THE CONTRACT PERIOD TO JULY 1, 2013 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2014 IN AN AMOUNT NOT -TO -EXCEED $35,000. e) APPROVED AGREEMENT NOT -TO -EXCEED $45,000 WITH THE CALIFORNIA CONSERVATION CORP. (CCC) FOR AS NEEDED TRAIL REPAIRS, BRUSH CLEARANCE AND MINOR MAINTENANCE IN PARKS AND OPEN SPACE, FOR THE 2013-14 FISCAL YEAR AND AUTHORIZED THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT. f) APPROVED AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE CONTRACT WITH VALLEYCREST LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE TO EXTEND THE TERM OF THE CONTRACT FROM JULY 1, 2013 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2015 TO PROVIDE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES AT NINE (9) CITY PARKS, GROUNDS OF THE DIAMOND BAR CENTER, FOOTBALL FIELD AND SLOPE AT LORBEER MIDDLE SCHOOL, AND THE MESA TRAIL/TRAIL HEAD AT SYCAMORE CANYON PARK, IN THE AMOUNT OF $368,995 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013-14 AND 2014-15; AND, AS -NEEDED WORK IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013-14 AND 2014-15 FOR A TOTAL AUTHORIZATION NOT TO EXCEED $393,995 ANNUALLY. 6.11 ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -XX: CONSENTING TO THE INCLUSION OF PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY'S JURISDICTION IN THE CALIFORNIA HERO PROGRAM TO FINANCE DISTRIBUTED GENERATION RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES, ENERGY AND WATER EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENTS AND ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING INFRASTRUCTURE, AND APPROVING THE AMENDMENT TO A CERTAIN JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT RELATED THERETO. (CONTINUED TO JULY 16, 2013) 7. PUBLIC HEARING: 7.1 ORDINANCE NO. 05(2013): AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO. 2013 -XX: AMENDING TABLES 2-5 AND 2-6 OF SECTION 22.10.030 OF THE DIAMOND BAR MUNICIPAL CODE. SP/Lee reported that this matter is an amendment to the Diamond Bar Zoning Regulations. Staff is proposing language to clarify the intent of an existing 150 foot distance requirement, requiring gas stations to be located at least 150 feet from a school in order to sell packaged alcoholic beverages. This amendment was initiated by the owners of the ARCO Service Station located at the southwest corner of Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard. The station wishes to upgrade their existing JUNE 18, 2013 PAGE 6 CITY COUNCIL alcoholic beverage license to include the sale of distilled spirits (hard liquor) at the existing Diamond Bar AM PM Mini Mart. If the Council approves the code amendment tonight the Conditional Use Permit application to upgrade the alcohol license will return to the Planning Commission for a de novo review after the amendment becomes effective. Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.10.030 requires gas stations to be located at least 150 feet from any school in order to sell packaged alcoholic beverages. The code broadly defines schools to include not only K-12 education but also a wide array of commercial uses and non -degree programs such as art, dance and martial arts studios, fitness training, commercial tutoring centers and such. However, it excludes childcare facilities and pre-schools from the definition. The applicant is requesting to limit the 150 foot distance requirement to "public and private elementary, middle and high schools" only. Based on staff's research into this matter, staff drafted language to clarify the intent of the current 150 foot distance requirement. It does not appear that the distance requirement was intended to include the entire spectrum of uses that are currently defined in the City's Municipal Code as a "school" and rather, the intent was more likely focused on grade schools where children are able to travel to and from school on their own accord as opposed to commercial tutoring or extra- curricular learning centers where children are more likely to be dropped and picked up by a parent or adult thus increasing the likelihood of exposure to alcohol advertising along with travel and juvenile loitering. To provide background on the history of this distance requirement, the City Council adopted an ordinance requiring a Conditional Use Permit to allow the sale of alcoholic beverages at gas station convenience stores and for such establishments to be located a minimum of 150 feet away from any schools. The City Council passed this ordinance in 2000 to ensure that the Planning Commission could adequately analyze the suitability of alcohol sales at a particular location. It was also noted during the Council meeting that the potential availability of alcohol at the Chevron Gas Station across the street from DBHS could become an attractive nuisance to the teenage students attending the high school as well as, increase the possibility of disorderly conduct by adults and the facilitation of negative interaction with juveniles. Therefore, the Council adopted the ordinance with the 150 foot distance requirement to reduce the possibility of nuisance activities that are sometimes associated with alcohol sales establishments near public schools. With the proposed clarifying language, service stations will not be unduly restricted by an overreaching distance restriction that was intended to limit the distance criteria to elementary, middle and high schools that are most likely negatively affected by proximity to service station convenience JUNE 18, 2013 PAGE 7 CITY COUNCIL stores that do sell alcohol and the majority of extra -curricular learning facilities provide supervision of children and children are typically dropped off and picked up by an adult. In addition, there are other types of schools such as vocational schools that cater to an adult clientele who do not constitute the target population that the Development Code was intended to protect. On February 26, 2013 the Planning Commission held a Public Hearing and recommended by a 5-0 vote that the City Council adopt the proposed amendment. There were no issues or objections raised by the public during the hearing. Over the years there have been an increasing number of commercial educational facilities located in commercial shopping centers; gas stations are typically located near these centers and, there may be commercial educational facilities located in these centers. Therefore, gas stations with a convenience store are being restricted by the current distance restriction that was intended to apply to only public and private grade schools. If the Council limits the distance criteria the following gas stations may be able to apply for a Conditional Use Permit to sell alcohol including the Mobil Gas Station on the northeast corner of Diamond Bar Boulevard and Sunset Crossing Road; the former Shell on the northeast corner of Diamond Bar Boulevard and Palomino; Mobil Station on the corner of Grand Avenue and Golden Springs Drive; Chevron Station on the southeast corner of Brea Canyon Road and Golden Springs Drive; and, Mobil on the corner of Brea Canyon Road and Golden Springs Drive. The crossed -out italicized underlined text highlights the recommended amendments to Footnote 5 and Table 2-5. Since the Planning Commission hearing, language has been added to clarify how the distance requirement is measured from the nearest property line. The same language is proposed to Footnote 3 and Table 2-6. The proposed Code Amendment is exempt from the provision of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as described under the following sections and staff recommends that the City Council approve for First Reading by Title Only, Waive Full Reading of the Ordinance adopting Development Code Amendment and schedule a Second Reading for July 16, 2013. Chair/Herrera stated that the agenda speaks to an Ordinance of the City Council approving Development Code Amendment and there is no number. SP/Lee responded that it should be Planning Case No. PL 2013-22. M/Tanaka opened the Public Hearing. JUNE 18, 2013 PAGE 8 CITY COUNCIL With no one present who wished to speak on this item, M/Tanaka closed the Public Hearing. C/Herrera said she believed that the City has always tried to enact laws, regulations and codes that make sense and she believes this amendment makes sense; especially in light of the definition of "schools" and that every shopping center has schools under that type of definition. C/Herrera moved, C/Chang seconded, to adopt Ordinance 05 (2013), an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar approving Development Code Amendment No. PL 2003-22 amending Tables 2-5 and 2-6 of Section 22.10.30 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Chang, Herrera, Tye, MPT/Everett, M/Tanaka NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None 8. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: None. 9. COUNCIL SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS AND MEETING ATTENDANCE REPORTS/COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS: C/Tye asked if staff could run a public service announcement about the LA County Fair and the opportunity to help children with their entry fees through the Big Yellow Bus program effort. C/Tye stated that a couple of weeks ago it was sobering to participate in the Relay for Life at Lorbeer Middle School and particularly touching to see the luminaries and realize that some of them are "in memory of"and a great number that "are in support of'. It was wonderful to talk with folks who were there that evening and to encourage them and to remember those that did not make it. We all hope for a cure for cancer and an end to Relay for Life events. C/Herrera said that she had an opportunity to speak with a couple of very important elected officials last week about DB's efforts to get the SR60 recognized as a Goods Movement Corridor and how important it is to the State and the nation. At a State Freight Network meeting in Long Beach, Executive Director of SCAG Hosanna Prada recognized the presence of DB. She had the opportunity to speak with Assemblywoman Bonnie Lowenthal, Assembly Chair of the Transportation Committee for California and her staff member Victoria Alvarez about the importance of including the SR60 as a Goods Movement Corridor in the State Freight Network as well as the National Freight Network. The next opportunity was on June 13 at the Four Corners Summit. She thanked staff members M/Tanaka and MPT/Everett who were in attendance. There were three panels of experts who spoke on economy, transportation and housing. She JUNE 18, 2013 PAGE 9 CITY COUNCIL talked with Lucy Dunn, a member of the California Transportation Commission who spoke at the event. Ms. Dunn asked C/Herrera what she was working on within the City and C/Herrera took that opportunity to tell Ms. Dunn about the SR60 and the City's efforts to get it included, particularly in the national plan so that DB can apply for money to fix the SR57/60 interchange. June 14 was an historic day. Foothill Transit Executive Board met and finalized the agreements that were then signed by Foothill Transit and Veolia amending their contract wherein Veolia would only be responsible for the transit stores and their employees and Foothill Transit, as of June 28, would interview the remainder of the employees, and by July 1 those employees would be engaged as Foothill Transit employees. Also that evening Doran Barnes became Foothill Transit's first employee. The Executive Board is very excited about these events and very excited to reconfigure how Foothill does business and looks forward to saving between one and two million dollars by taking this action. C/Chang reminded everyone that they can follow her on Facebook, Twitter and Foursquare. She was asked to speak at the Regional Chamber's Women's Business Council on Women in Politics. It was a very engaging business council and hoped that it would grow in the future. She attended the League of California Cities meeting with M/Tanaka, C/Herrera and CM/DeStefano where she was elected President of the League since former President Steve Diels from Redondo Beach was termed out of his Council seat in March. She attended the Revenue & Tax Policy Committee meeting in Sacramento on behalf of the City and the League of California Cities. She was also asked to attend the meeting with Caltrans in Congressman Ed Royce's office regarding the closure of a few on/off ramps in the coming months and its effect on the SR60. DB staff was in attendance and will be submitting closure information on Facebook and Twitter. She was also asked to speak at Scripps College yesterday with the new leadership program to encourage young women to get involved and run for public office. It was uplifting to see the involvement and curiosity from the young college students and felt that in the future there would be a lot more involvement in politics. MPT/Everett said that yesterday it was his privilege to meet at the Diamond Bar Center for the Annual Fire Season Meeting and Press Conference of Region 1 and Region 6. Fire personnel from San Diego to Kern County to Riverside, San Bernardino, and of course, LA County met to review and prepare for the upcoming fire season. This is the third year of drought, which is a serious problem. County Fire Chief Osby oversaw and kicked off the press conference by stating that people need to work together. It's already into the season, but planning is not trivial as he heard Chief Osby speak about things like mutual aid JUNE 18, 2013 PAGE 10 CITY COUNCIL that doesn't just happen, it has to be coordinated; agreements need to be in place before the fires start. The challenge of contracting aircraft which come from other regions including Canada and getting those all coordinated to meet our needs. The next reminder we had came from Ventura County Fire Chief reminding us of the preparation by the residents and businesses. It's not too late to start. Ninety-five percent of all fires are started by people. So again, it's the people. He then stated that he attended The Four Corners Coalition 2013 Economic Summit. There were great panelists and good dialogue with questions from the audience. It was a healthy opportunity to talk about the economy — number one it's very important and still tentative and needs our collaborative efforts on it; transportation and the challenges we've talked about including our significant SR57/60 and then of course, housing, which is not trivial to any of us in California. The next event he had a chance to attend with M/Tanaka was at the American Red Cross. He met with the CEO's of the Blood Services location, a new building that's fully operational for processing the blood banks and the blood source around the country. It is located in the CalPoly Innovation Village between the CalPoly Campus and Valley Boulevard right near Temple. They do a wonderful job with quality blood processing; however they are running short and so one item is the emphasis. Be available if you can and consider donating blood during the summer months. There are some contests that they are working on and started two years ago with the city -to -city challenge to try to encourage cities to compete and donate blood. The other thing that we always know about is that they are first at a disaster with resources, coordination and help. If you are interested in volunteering you can go online to their website www.redcrossla.orq where you can find out what a volunteer does as well complete an application. In DB we have 28 registered volunteers that are responding 365 days a year in LA County. We have one volunteer that is registered nationally to go to a national event. We are very proud of DBHS and the club that they have that sponsors blood drives, education and promotion. The thing Red Cross brings is great training and so if you want to volunteer and learn and grow and maybe see the country he would encourage everyone to seek out the opportunities to help American Red Cross as a volunteer. The other challenge is that they are also working very hard to strengthen the feeding and sheltering in case of disasters. The target that they have set statewide and then down to the cities is 10 percent of our population. At this point in time DB has 521 capacity for housing and feeding/sheltering in a disaster. Quite a bit less than we need if it is 10 percent of our population so that's something for us to work on. At the same time they've started the last couple of years documenting as the fire department talked about doing, their needs and agreements ahead of time before they have the fires. In the Red Cross case they want a Memo of Understanding with cities, faith -based organizations, schools and other facilities where there are JUNE 18, 2013 PAGE 11 CITY COUNCIL places for housing like big rooms, rec rooms, facilities that are available, and that is something he would encourage our City to take a look at. We've worked with the Sheriff, we've worked with the Fire Department and together for our citizens of the City of DB we really need to focus on coordinating all of these so we're not duplicating efforts and at this point in time he does not think we have too much resource so we want to make sure we coordinate it. Thank you very much. Enjoy the summer and we'll see you back here in AQMD end of September. In the meantime, join us at the Windmill Room. M/Tanaka reported that he also had an opportunity to attend the League of California Cities LA Division meeting where there were several guest speakers on the topic of prison realignment and AB109 and its effects on the local cities. Saturday and Sunday the American Cancer Society held its DB Relay for Life. It ran from 9:00 a.m. on Saturday to 9:00 a.m. on Sunday where they raised funds for cancer cure research and raising cancer awareness. They have three simple words that kind of is the theme for the relay and that's "Remember, Celebrate and Fight Back" so remember those that have lost their lives to the battle of cancer, celebrate the survivors and those individuals who are cancer free and fight back for those that are undergoing treatment. It was a very successful event and they were able to raise funds for both cancer research and for providing cancer awareness. The team that participated this year again were DBHS Leo's and Lions that were part of the many teams that participated this year keeping one person on the track for 24 hours of the days. That's because cancer never sleeps. On Tuesday, June 11 he attended the 33rd annual scholarship dinner which was hosted by the LA County Sheriff's Department Korean -American Sheriff's Association where they awarded 10 scholarships to outstanding students that are children of employees of the Sheriff's Department. Former D.B. Mayor Wen Chang, who is a board member of the San Gabriel /Pomona Valley American Red Cross, invited MPT/Everett and him to attend a meeting with the American Red Cross at the Southern California Blood Center in Pomona where they were told about emergency preparedness and other services such as housing and food in time of need. He also attended the Four Corners Coalition Economic Summit and heard wonderful panels that addressed the economy, transportation, jobs and housing in our area. He wished a Happy Anniversary to his wife Wanda of 41 years. RECESS: M/Tanaka recessed the Regular City Council Meeting to Closed Session at 7:25 p.m. RECONVENE: M/Tanaka reconvened the Regular City Council Meeting at 8:10 p.m. CLOSED SESSION: Room CC -8 JUNE 18, 2013 PAGE 12 CITY COUNCIL ► CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION Government Code Section 54956.9 (d)(1) One Case — Princesita Torres v. City of Diamond Bar — Case No. KC063979 ADJOURNMENT: With no further business to conduct, M/Tanaka adjourned the Regular City Council Meeting at 8:12 p.m. TOMMYE CRIBBINS, CITY CLERK The foregoing minutes are hereby approved this day of 2013. JACK TANAKA, MAYOR CITY OF DIAMOND BAR Agenda No. 6.3 MINUTES OF THE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION DIAMOND BAR CITY HALL -THE WINDMILL ROOM 21810 COPLEY DRIVE, DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 APRIL 25, 2013 CALL TO ORDER: Chair/Grundy called the Parks and Recreation Commission meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. in the City Hall Windmill Room, 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Commissioner Roberto led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Benny Liang, Dave Roberto and Chairman Dave Grundy. Absent: Commissioner Lew Herndon and Vice Chairman Ted Owens were excused. Staff Present: Bob Rose, Community Services Director; Anthony Jordan, Parks and - Maintenance Superintendent; Alison Meyers, Community Services Coordinator; Andee Tarazon, Community Services Coordinator, and Debbie Gonzales, Administrative Coordinator. A. DB4YOUTH — RECOGNITION OF OUTGOING(INCOMING BOARD MEMBERS — CSC/Meyers MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE: None CALENDAR OF EVENTS: As presented by CSD/Rose. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: C/Roberto moved, C/Liang seconded, to approve the Consent Calendar as presented. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS NOES: COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS Liang, Roberto, Chair/Grundy None Herndon, VC/Owens 1.1 Regular Meeting Minutes of the March 23, 2013 Meeting — approved as presented. 2. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 2.1 Recreation Program Update — CSC/Tarazon Chair/Grundy asked if there was a number of Volunteens accepted and CSC/Tarazon responded that the application states that only 40 will be accepted. Each year staff has stretched that number slightly over 40. It APRIL 25, 2013 PAGE 2 P&R COMMISSION depends on how well the prospective participants interview and how many the programs can accommodate. Chair/Grundy asked why gymnasiums will not be available until September for Adult Basketball and CSD/Rose responded that the school districts are using their facilities and/or conducting maintenance on their facilities and the City has been told that Lorbeer, South Pointe, Diamond Ranch High School, Diamond Bar High School and Walnut High School are not available during that time. This is the first time this has happened and it may also cut into the number of leagues the City is able to offer in the next fiscal year. Chair/Grundy asked if staff expects this to occur next year and CSD/Rose said staff would stay in touch with the schools to see what happens. This has never happened before so it is staffs assumption this will be a one-time issue. 2.1.1 Power Point Presentation on the 24th Annual City Birthday Party - CSC/Tarazon Chair/Grundy asked how many volunteers participated in the event and CSC/Tarazon responded that approximately 220 volunteers from Diamond Ranch High School and Diamond Bar High School participated that day. Chair/Grundy asked how 6,000 attendees compared to last year and CSD/Rose responded there were fewer attendees this' year. CSC/Tarazon stated that the wristband revenue was up about $1,000 over last year so even though there were fewer attendees, more tickets were purchased this year. 2.2 Parks Report — PMS/Jordan 2.2.1 Power Point Presentation on copper wire theft at Peterson Park — PMS/Jordan C/Roberto asked how staff is handling these types of situations at other parks. PMS/Jordan stated that the City has had thefts at Heritage Park and others. Heritage Park has hand holds on the bottom of the steel poles and after those thefts staff welded those shut. Other parks that have the concrete boxes have been secured with construction adhesive and Tapcon screws. Although this mitigation measures create a lot of extra work for staff it takes only one theft to realize the cost benefit. Chair/Grundy asked if staff considered putting in contact switches so if the vault is opened it would set off an alarm. Staff has considered this but has not looked into the cost. APRIL 25, 2013 PAGE 3 P&R COMMISSION 2.3 CIP Projects CSD/Rose 2.3.1 Dog Park at Pantera Meadow — CSD/Rose reported that staff has reviewed and approved the plans for the two shade shelters which should be delivered by the fabricator in about six weeks. Staff received the additional dog drinking fountains and six additional benches for fenced areas of the dog park. All of the equipment will be installed at the same time and should be in place by the start of summer. 2.3.2 Grandview Trail and Grandview Trail Link - CSD/Rose stated that the survey work has been completed and TKE Engineering and Planning is working on the construction documents. Staff will meet with TKE next week to go over the plans and discuss the possibility of a community meeting. There will not be any construction until the start of the new fiscal year. 2.3.3 Site D Public Park — CSD/Rose reported that Lennar Homes has scheduled a workshop for the Site D Public Park for May 9 at Heritage Park. Emails will be sent to the Commissioners regarding what will be discussed at the meeting and mailers will be sent to individuals who previously attended the workshop as well as, those who have indicated an interest in knowing what is planned. 2.3.4 Larkstone Park— CSD/Rose stated that this project is still in plan check. The plans were sent back to Lewis Homes for them to finish the update and corrections. Staff expects the plans to come back to the City in the near future for a final plan check. Although the plans will be completed, staff has no idea when Lewis plans to move forward to construct the homes and build the park. The City is hopeful that with the recent improvements to the housing market this project will be back on track in the near future. C/Liang asked CSD/Rose what he thinks of the dog park and whether he sees a lot of people using the park. CSD/Rose said that every time he has gone by there have been a lot of people. Usually between 10:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. it tends to quiet down but weekends and early evenings he has seen a lot of dogs in the two play areas. C/Liang asked if there had been any incidents and CSD/Rose said there will always be incidents but for the most part most individuals want others to follow the rules and when they speak out their thoughts are not always appreciated and are met with some hostility or are ignored altogether. Anyone who needs assistance should call the Sheriff's Department, not with the intent of having someone arrested or presented with a citation, but sometimes individuals are good at conversing and others who come on too strong are met with defensiveness. The deputies are very good at mediating discussions and getting people to engage in APRIL 25, 2013 PAGE 4 P&R COrvMSSION productive conversation. 2.4 List of Pending Commission Requests — CSD/Rose 2.4.1 Improvements at the Diamond Bar Center — CSD/Rose reported that about 20 lights were put up for the stage in the main ballroom. There is still work to be done. All of the new security cameras have been installed. Work is still being done to the sound equipment and projector. The challenge of this project is that there are ongoing events and from day to day the contractors are doing work on something that causes something else not to work properly so at the end of each workday staff has to monitor the situation and get everything reprogrammed for the next event. For the most part it has worked out with the exception of one event for which the projector did not work. The family had a video they wanted to show during their wedding reception. Staff pulled out the backup system so that the event could proceed but the family was disappointed that the projector was on the floor. The family thought it was intrusive and not what they had expected and staff offered them a partial refund on their event for which the contractor reimbursed the City. Since that happened, the contractor has arrived on the day of the events to double check the systems. Staff hopes the project will be finished in the near future. 2.4.2 Trail connection from Silver Tip Park to Pantera Park — CSD/Rose stated that the helipad is near completion and the CCC is on notice to help find a pathway from Silver Tip to Pantera once construction is completed. 2.4.3 Site D Public Park — Public Workshop scheduled for May 9 at Heritage Park. 2.4.3 Poison Oak Signs for Dog Park — CSD/Rose said the signs have been received and should be installed by next week. 3. OLD BUSINESS: None 4. NEW BUSINESS: None 5. ANNOUNCEMENTS: C/Roberto thanked staff for tonight's reports and welcomed CSC/Tarazon back to the Commission meetings. Last meeting there was a discussion about the Pony League coming to the City about joint use of their facility and asked fora report about the discussion. CSD/Rose responded that he would provide the Commission with a report. APRIL 25, 2013 PAGES P&R C/Liang thanked staff for the great presentations this evening. He said he felt the City Birthday Party was a well -organized event. He thanked CSD/Rose for following up on items of concern to the Commission. The updated lighting and security cameras for the Diamond Bar Center are great things to address public safety issues. Chair/Grundy thanked staff for doing such a great job with events like the City Birthday Party- as well as, the reports to Commissioners. He thanked MPT/Everett for being present this evening and supporting the Commission. ADJOURNMENT: C/Liang moved, C/Roberto seconded, to adjourn the Parks and Recreation Commission meeting. With no one objecting and no further business before the Parks and Recreation Commission, Chair/Grundy adjourned the meeting at 7:55 p.m. The foregoing minutes are hereby approved this 9thday of July 2013. Respectful bmitted, B6 S ,SECRETARY CITY COUNCIL �'�'CokPORA'fL'� 7yg9 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council VIA: James DeStefano, City Ma a TITLE: Treasurer's Statement — May 201 RECOMMENDATION: Approve the May 2013 Treasurer's Statement. FINANCIAL IMPACT: No Fiscal Impact BACKGROUND: Agenda # 6.5 Meeting Date: Jul 16, 2013 AGENDA REPORT Per City policy, the Finance Department presents the monthly Treasurer's Statement for the City Council's review and approval. This statement shows the cash balances with a breakdown of various investment accounts and the yield to maturity from investments. This statement also includes an investment portfolio management report which details the activities of the investments. All investments have been made in accordance with the City's Investment Policy. PREPARED BY: Susan Full, Senior Accountant REVIEWED BY: Dianna Honeywell, Finance DO ector Attachments: Treasurer's Statement, Investment Portfolio Report Dave Doyle, Assistant City Manager CITY OF DIAMOND BAR - CITY TREASURER'S REPORT CASH BALANCE AS OF MAY 31, 2013 BEGINNING CASH BALANCE CASH RECEIVED Cash Receipts $5,049,661.09 $24,451,599.49 Total Cash Received ($109,104.70) $5,049,661.09 $41,311.95 Change Fund $29,501,260.58 EXPENDITURES $500.00 Cash With Fiscal Agent Checks Written ($1,461,985.91) $4,067.70 Payroll Transfers (343,881.02) Investment Funds: Wire Transfers (584,477.95) $9,490,158.20 Returned Checks (584.38) Federal Agency Callable Charge Card Fees & Other Adjustments (2,957.43) $6,446,485.27 Total Expenditures $2,402,030.31 ($2,393,886.69) CASH BALANCE AS OF: May 31, 2013 $27,107,373.89 TOTAL CASH BREAKDOWN Active Funds General Account ($109,104.70) Payroll Account $41,311.95 Change Fund $1,000.00 Petty Cash Account $500.00 Cash With Fiscal Agent $584,478.13 Unamortized Discount on Investments $4,067.70 Total Active Funds $522,253.08 Investment Funds: Local Agency Investment Fund $9,490,158.20 Corporate Floating Rate Notes $749,497.24 Federal Agency Callable $7,496,949.79 Bank Negotiable CDs $6,446,485.27 Wells Fargo Advantage Money Market Fund $2,402,030.31 Total Investment Funds $26,585,120.81 CASH BALANCE AS OF: May 31, 2013 $27,107,373.89 Average Yield to Maturity 0.625% FY2012-13 Year -To -Date Interest Earnings $150,945.82 FY2012-13 Budgeted Annual Interest Earnings $189,600.00 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY REPORT for the Month of May 31, 2013 PERCENT OF DAYS TO INVESTMENTS BOOK VALUE PORTFOLIO TERM MATURITY YIELD TO MATURITY Local Agency Investment Fund $9,490,158.20 35.70% 1 1 0.245 Corporate Floating Rate Notes $749,497.24 2.82% 931 879 0.501 Federal Agency Issues - Callable $7,496,949.79 28.20% 1,637 494 0.827 Negotiable CD's - Banks $6,446,485.27 24.25% 1,363 992 1.194 Wells Fargo Sweep Account $2,402,030.31 9.04% 1 1 0.010 Total Investments and Averages $26,585,120.81 100.00% 819 405 0.625 TOTALS $26,585,120.81 100.00% N/A N/A N/A TOTAL INTEREST EARNED X; P 4agr6s DeStefa o City Treasurer 6/28/2013 Date MONTH ENDING May 31, 2013 $13,106.32 FISCAL YEAR-TO-DATE 2012-13 $150,945.82 I certify that this report accurately reflects all City pooled investments and is in conformity with the investment policy of the City of Diamond Bar approved by City Council and on file in the City Clerk's office. The investment program herein provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures. Page 1 N NN m o N N 0 O 4 a 0 O O h N h N V O N 4J O 0 M N N O N O Em 6 O w m o < o 0 o r W e f N h N C1 N OR W Ol N O r 0' 10 C m vv o O D N 0 G rn m m v o v N' of r m r �n O] r r N 4 a y G m a o 0 A O G >v'- Em 6 w m o < o voi Oj W Z f `m 0) r (O N N 10 C m vv o JO LL Zo � LL G ` O O] r r N [O U r V) T @ N 4 a LL G m a o 0 0 O G >v'- Em 6 w m o < o voi Oj W Z 0) r (O N N 10 C m vv o JO LL Zo � LL G N M T @ 4 a LL G d O Em 6 w a d c U 3 Z vo C N W a m vv o JO LL Zo > LL G m C LU O F- M w IA N O 5 m r r m r m r m m m m m n m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 m O O O O O m O.N O O m N O h M c N O m (O r O m O V m N N N m m m m m m m r O o m a r m W�Baa�����mm�mB &R�8&AOD OR W q CD $8S8$p%A ' m rn M o o m m 0 0 0 0 o m M m m o o v O o 0 n n ei Ci o 0 of o 0 0 oo N r ri oo n of m O] r O O N m O O O O m W O V n o r o o r N 0 0 0 0 r e o m of of of o 0 of of o 0 0 o ai - a (u v m a u0i uoi a s uoi voi voi voi a v voi a n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O N N N N N N N N N N N O N N N M M M m M M M M N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N (O N M N r m Ol r h (O O] fD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N N N A A A A A A A A Q Q v v d d d d o o o o o E E E E E E E E E E E E m m LL LL LL LL LL LL LL=_ m m m Z Z a a a a a v v v a o o v a a v v a v v v d v v d d d d d LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL a O O O O O O O O O O O O O O a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m A U U C a a_ i Q m J N Y V m e O Imi O m a U U U U U U O N N e M 0 0 y LLI W W W W W W m m m m C7 U' C7 9 M M M M M M m M M M m e N m a`` m` m` M M M M M M M M LL M M C) M eJ M i+) !n cJ m CJ eJ eJ (OBJ 0 O 0 n e m' 1p N m r m V r n J a O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O a ci N N N N N N N N N N N N N N i0 m O r N in n OI m w m v e O O N N N N N O O O O N a � N R> .O 2 LL> Y J m vLLi W Z 0 o n o m v in 'v 2i d m LLI T O r m m O m N m n r m O LL' - o - - - - o - - - d a m N M N N m (O m N [O [O N N N o m r m m n r m v M m m m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O N O m N O M m o r in q o Io N e r t` 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m M m m m m m m m m m m W N N N N N N N N N N N N N N o O N m N n r r O1 m m m M e e M 0 of r �o n ui 6 vi r6 r 6 M M .- m m o m (Mo m y Mr T in rmi rmi o e V N N V N V N N e N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 o m 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ro ro ro m ro m ai ai m of ro ro ro of e e e e v e e e e e e e e e N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m CJ N Ol O e- m m Q V O O O N O N 0 (� V 0 0 0 o O o O O o 0 0 0 Y m O +� V Y j T d o u r m Q¢ m m m U U o LL LL w (D WU' (7 m N O m e M O O N m m N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P N R> .O 2 LL> Y J m vLLi W Z 0 o n o m v in 'v 2i d m m vsi r r O r M o m N v m N m v m m r m h e 0 Z O O O O O n N N CJ M (m") CmJ CMJ K u �O M M 10 P !O h 7 OI m M h N m P T h M M VI T m m N O a m V O h m N r N n O W N r K OO1 O r m W M M r m r f0 m m �- CI N l0 P N P P Q V Q P N Yl Q i0 N N N N N N N N N N N N O p O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 p o 0 0 0 0 0 o p o a n a O o a o o 0 0 n o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl o p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ai m a . . . m . . of m N N N N N NN N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 N N cpi N O r O m th M N m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •r W N' N J A O J❑ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Cd N Y O .�- N t6 W d m fp h O M r n m O r m Y1 m £ y A'C P m N m m Q i0 O M O m W a Om N m� N O N a o o m m Y d m mm m c m m A p N Z '� LL ¢ LL ¢ L d a 2 m d V d Lp N o o 0 0 0 0 0 A q O N N O N N m M O m N O m m h o P r n m o r m m N A A a U . W ;A A o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o po o n n J O O O O O O O O O O O N N A O O O O O OO O O O O m N m� A C O O O O O O O O O O O m W Y O O O O O O O O O O O P > A ¢m 0 V �Qp m Q P Q Q P P P P P P Q N N N N N N N N N N N N Q V u �O M M 10 P !O h 7 OI m M h N m P T h M M VI T m m N O a m V O h m N r N n O W N r K OO1 O r m W M M r m r f0 m m �- CI N l0 P N P P Q V Q P N Yl Q i0 N N N N N N N N N N N N O p O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 p o 0 0 0 0 0 o p o a n a O o a o o 0 0 n o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl o p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ai m a . . . m . . of m N N N N N NN N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 N N cpi N O r O m th M N m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •r W N' N J A O N C x O m Cd N Y O N t6 W d d E m £ y i� > N N O N a o o m m Y d m mm m c m m A p N Z '� LL ¢ LL ¢ L d a 2 m d V d Lp N o i Oo N A A a U . ;A a'. O IL a i J,. fn I J N m� A C > A ¢m u �O M M 10 P !O h 7 OI m M h N m P T h M M VI T m m N O a m V O h m N r N n O W N r K OO1 O r m W M M r m r f0 m m �- CI N l0 P N P P Q V Q P N Yl Q i0 N N N N N N N N N N N N O p O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 p o 0 0 0 0 0 o p o a n a O o a o o 0 0 n o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl o p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ai m a . . . m . . of m N N N N N NN N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 N N cpi N O r O m th M N m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •r W T N' A O C5 C x O m Cd O m j ¢ j YO m m i� Z O Y U VJ C Y N N N 'U N T N' A O C x O m O m j ¢ j YO m m i� Z O Y U VJ C Y N N N 'U N N � A mm m c o o m m Y d m mm m c m m A p N Z '� LL ¢ LL ¢ L d a 2 m d V d Lp N o a o A N A 0 0 a'. a J,. fn I J N O N VPl N h (O O H O M N� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U v S y0m=�ic'iYa>mz � z 0 m¢ tin m m v a o� d 2 v m a v a m umi m mr n m m q CITY COUNCIL Agenda # 6.6 Meeting Date: July 16, 2013 AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council r VIA: James DeStefano, Cit n TITLE: Second Reading of Ord nance XX(2013) for Development Code Amendment Planning Case No. PL2013-022 to Revise Tables 2-5 and 2-6 of Section 22.10.030 of the Municipal Code. PROPERTY OWNER: Mahnaz Farsai, 23276 S. Pointe Drive #100, Laguna Hills, CA 92653 APPLICANT: Ryan Farsai, 23276 S. Pointe Drive #100, Laguna Hills, CA 92653 PROJECT LOCATION: Citywide RECOMMENDATION: Approve for Second Reading by Title only, Waive full reading of Ordinance No. XX(2013) and adopt. FINANCIAL SUMMARY: The costs associated with the review of this application have been borne by the applicant. BACKGROUND: On June 18, 2013, the City Council conducted a public hearing and approved for first reading of Ordinance No. XX(2013) to revise Tables 2-5 and 2-6 of Diamond Bar Development Code. Staff provided Council with an Ordinance making determinations that the proposed Development Code Amendment would specify that for gas stations to be eligible to sell packaged alcoholic beverages, they must be at least 150 feet from any public or private elementary, middle and high school. This narrowed the scope of the distance requirement, which applied to "all schools" as defined in the Development Code. The Council approved the first reading by 5-0 vote. Prepared by: 4S. Te Lee Senior Planner Reviewed by: --EW David Doyle Assistant City Manager Attachments: 1. CC Staff Report Dated June 18, 2013 2. Ordinance No. XX(2013) Reviewed by: i Greg Gubman, AICP Community Development Director DCA PL No. 2013-022 SECOND READING Page 2 CITY COUNCIL TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Agenda # 7.1 Meeting Date: June 18, 2013 Attachment 1 AGENDA REPORT VIA: James DeStefano, City Ma(9 . ----v TITLE: ORDINANCE NO. XX(2013) OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AMENDING TABLES 2-5 AND 2-6 OF SECTION 22.10.030 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE APPLICANT: Ryan Farsai, 23276 S. Pointe Drive #100, Laguna Hills, CA 92653 RECOMMENDATION: Approve for First Reading by title only, waive full reading, and schedule Second Reading for July 16, 2013. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The costs associated with the review of this application have been borne by the applicant. SUMMARY: This proposed amendment to the Development Code was initiated by the owners of the Arco service station located at the southwest corner of Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard. Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DMBC) Section 22.10.030 requires gas stations to be located at least 150 feet from "any" school in order to be eligible to sell packaged alcoholic beverages. The DBMC broadly defines "school' to include not only K-12 education, but also a wide array of commercial uses and non -degree programs, including art, dance and martial arts studios, fitness training, commercial tutoring centers, and establishments that provide courses via Internet; but expressly excludes child care facilities or preschools from this definition. The applicant is requesting an amendment to the Development Code to limit the above described 150 -foot distance requirement to public and private elementary, middle and high schools only. Based on staffs research into this matter, it does not appear that the 150 -foot distance requirement was intended to include the entire spectrum of uses broadly defined as "schools" in the Development Code. Rather, the intent was more likely focused on grade schools where children are able to travel to and from school on their own accord (as opposed to commercial tutoring or other extracurricular learning centers where children are more likely to Page 1 925302.1 be dropped off and picked up by an adult—or other types of schools that cater to an adult clientele)—and thus increase the likelihood of exposure to alcohol merchandising along their paths of travel. As such, the proposed Development Code Amendment will limit the distance criteria to only those classifications of schools that would most likely be negatively affected by proximity to service station convenience stores that sell alcohol; namely elementary, middle and high schools. At the same time, by eliminating the distance requirement from being applicable to less vulnerable categories of schools, service stations will not be unduly restricted by an overreaching distance restriction, particularly since many gas stations are adjacent to shopping centers which have increasing numbers of tenants that fall into the "school' category. BACKGROUND: Regulatory Histo In 2000, the City Council adopted an ordinance requiring a conditional use permit to allow the sale of alcoholic beverages for off-site consumption in conjunction with the sale of motor fuel, and for such retail establishments to be located a minimum of 150 feet away from any school. The Council passed this ordinance to ensure that that the Planning Commission adequately analyze the suitability of alcohol sales at a particular location in order to minimize juvenile loitering and exposure to alcohol advertising at service stations. It was noted during the Council meeting that the potential availability of alcohol at the Chevron gas station at the comer of Pathfinder and Brea Canyon Road located, across the street from Diamond Bar High School, could become an attractive nuisance to the teenage students attending the high school, increase the possibilities of disorderly conduct by adults and/or facilitate negative interaction with juveniles. Hence, the Council adopted the ordinance with the 150 -foot distance criterion to reduce the possibility of nuisance activities that are sometimes associated with alcohol sales establishments near public schools. Planning Commission Review On February 26, 2013, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Development Code Amendment application. After discussion and incorporation of comments into the language of the proposed amendment, the Commission recommended, by a 5-0 vote, that the City Council adopt the proposed amendment, specifying that the 150 -foot distance requirement apply to public and private elementary, middle and high schools. The staff report and meeting minutes are attached to this report. There were no issues or objections raised by the public during the hearing. Page 2 925302.1 ANALYSIS: Policy Issue Extracurricular learning facilities such as tutoring centers, art and music schools, dance and yoga studios fall into the definition of a "school' found in the Development Code, as do vocational schools, traffic schools and establishments providing courses via Internet. Currently, off-site alcohol sales from motor fuel service stations must be at least 150 feet away from all schools, measured from property line to property line. Over the years, there have been an increasing number of commercial educational facilities located in commercial shopping centers. Gas stations are typically located near shopping centers that may be occupied by these types of educational facilities. Hence, gas stations with a convenience store are being unduly restricted by a distance restriction that was intended to apply to only public and private K-12 schools that would most likely be negatively affected by proximity to gas station convenience stores that sell alcohol. When the City Council passed the ordinance with the 150 -foot distance requirement, it was intended to apply to grade schools where children are more likely to travel to and from school on their own accord, instead of being dropped off and picked up by an adult, as is the case with many commercial tutoring and commercial instructional businesses—and there were thus concerns of possible juvenile loitering and other nuisance activities near the alcohol sales establishments. Staff does not believe that the 150 -foot separation requirement was intended to apply to the broad spectrum of uses defined as "schools" in the Development Code. The majority of extracurricular learning facilities provide supervision of children and children are typically dropped off and picked up by a parent or other adult. In addition, there are other types of schools such as vocational schools that cater to adult clientele who do not constitute the target population that the Development Code was intended to protect. Therefore, the proposed amendment to the Development Code would not increase the exposure of children to alcohol advertising and juvenile loitering, or negatively affect those types of schools that the 150 -foot distance requirement was intended to apply to. If the Council limits the distance criteria to only public and private grade schools, the following gas stations may apply for a Conditional Use Permit to sell alcohol: Mobil on northeast corner of Diamond Bar Blvd. and Sunset Crossing. • Former Shell on northeast corner of Diamond Bar Blvd. and Palomino. • Mobil on northeast corner of Grand and Golden Springs. Y Chevron on southeast corner of Brea Canyon Road and Golden Springs. • Mobil on northwest corner of Brea Canyon Road and Golden Springs. Page 3 925302.1 Review Authority (Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.70) Pursuant to Development Code Section 22.70, requests to amend the Development Code require public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council. Before the City Council may adopt an ordinance to amend the Development Code, the Planning Commission must first conduct a public hearing to consider the proposed amendments. The Commission reviewed and forwarded its recommendations via a resolution advising the Council that the proposed amendment should be adopted. Development Code Amendments are legislative actions subject to approval by the City Council through the adoption of ordinances. Development Code Amendments become applicable Citywide. In order to approve the proposed Development Code Amendment, the City decision makers must determine that the amendment will further the goals, objectives and policies of the City without having an overriding negative effect on the community. The following summarizes the current Development Code standard and the recommended amendment to the section in the Development Code. Strike -out, italicized and underlined text highlight the recommended revisions. Since the Planning Commission hearing, language has been added to simply clarify that the distance requirement is measured from the nearest property lines. ARTICLE II. ZONING DISTRICTS AND ALLOWABLE LAND USES CHAPTER 22.10—COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS Section 22.10.030—Commercial/Industrial district land uses and permit requirements. 1. RECOMMENDATION: Revise footnote 5 to Table 2-5 and footnote 3 to Table 2-6 (Allowed Uses and Permit Requirements for Office and Commercial/Industrial Zoning Districts). Table 2-5—Offire Znnina nictrirtc LAND USE OP OB (31) CO Alcoholic beverage sales, off- Alcoholic beverage sales, off- site, in conjunction with the sale CUP CUP CUP of motor fuel (5) CUP of motor fuel (3) Notes: (5) Shall be a minimum of 150 feet, f£�heel measured fi-o777 the nearestrU oner tv lines firom any nablic or pi*ate elementary middle or high school as defined by Education Code Section 49430 or aary equivalent private school perfomnivgtheinction ofsuclz schools Tnhl P LAND USE C-1 C-2 C-3 I Alcoholic beverage sales, off- site, in conjunction with the sale CUP CUP CUP of motor fuel (3) 925302.1 Page 4 Notes: (3) Shall be a minimum of 150 feet, fiefii aRy seheel measured Sronr the nearestfro ern, lins,fi-on arry public or private elementary. middle or hi --h school as defiLned by Education Code Section 49430 or any equivalent private school 1 erformin2 dae fcmction ofsuch schools. Public Comments Received At the time the staff report was published, staff had not received any comments from the public. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The City has determined that the proposed Development Code Amendment is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as prescribed under Section 15061(b)(3) (No Potential for Causing Significant Effect on the Environment) and Section 15378(b)(5) (Administrative Activities of Governments That Will Not Result in Direct or Indirect Physical Changes in the Environment) of the CEQA Guidelines. Therefore, no further environmental review is required. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: Public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 500 -foot radius of the project site on June 7, 2013, and the notice of at least 1/8 page display was published in the Inland Valley Daily Tribune and San Gabriel Valley Tribune newspapers. Pursuant to Planning and Zoning Law Government Code Section 65091(a)(3), if the number of property owners to whom a public hearing notice would be mailed is greater than 1000, a local agency may provide notice by placing a display advertisement 1/8 page in one newspaper of general circulation. The project site was posted with a notice display board, and a copy of the public notice was posted at the City's three designated community posting sites. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Ordinance No. XX(2013) (Attachment 1) to approve the Development Code Amendment - Planning Case No. PL2013-022. Prepared by: ,-L Grace S. Lee Senior Planner Reviewed by: David Doyle Assistant City Manager Reviewed by: Greg Gubman, AICP Community Development Director Page 5 925302.1 Attachments: 1. Draft Ordinance No. XX(2013) 2. Planning Commission Staff Report and Minutes Dated February 26, 2013 3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-04 Recommending Approval of DCA 925302.1 Page 6 Attachment 2 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 2013 -XX AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT (PLANNING CASE NO. PL2013-22) TO REVISE TABLES 2-5 AND 2-6 OF SECTION 22.10.030 OF THE DIAMOND BAR MUNICIPAL CODE A. RECITALS 1. On July 25, 1995, the City of Diamond Bar adopted its General Plan. The General Plan establishes goals, objectives and strategies to implement the community's vision for its future. 2. On November 3, 1998, the City of Diamond Bar adopted a Development Code. Title 22 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code which contains the Development Code is now currently applicable to development applications within the City of Diamond Bar. 3. Administering the Development Code for over 10 years demonstrated that certain clarifications and modifications are warranted based on the City's experience. 4. The City of Diamond Bar has reviewed a request by Ryan Farsai to amend the Development Code to clarify the 150 -foot distance separation requirement between gas station convenience stores that sell alcoholic beverages and schools. The Development Code defines "school" very broadly, and includes not only grade schools, but also such uses as martial arts studios, vocational schools and traffic schools. The proposed development code amendment will limit the distance separation requirement to public and private elementary, middle and high schools. Making provisions for narrowing the distance criteria furthers the intent of the office and commercial zoning districts. 5. On February 26, 2013, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded the public hearing. At that time, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2013-04 recommending that the City Council adopt Development Code Amendment Planning Case No. PI -2013-22. 6. On June 7, 2013, public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 500 -foot radius of the project site, and the notice for this application was published in the Inland Valley Bulletin and the San Gabriel Valley Tribune. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65091 (a)(3), if the number of property owners to whom a public hearing notice would be mailed is greater than 1,000, a local agency may provide notice by placing a display advertisement of at least one-eighth page in at least one newspaper of general circulation. On June 7, 2013, the City placed a one-eighth page display advertisement in the above mentioned newspapers of general circulation. All persons wishing to testify at the public hearing in connection with said amendment were heard, and said amendment was studied; and 7. On June 18, 2013, the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing with regard to the Development Code Amendment. At that time, the City Council concluded the public hearing. 8. Following due consideration of the public testimony, staff analysis, and the Planning Commission's recommendation, the City Council finds that the Development Code Amendment set forth herein is consistent with the General Plan. 9. The City Council hereby finds that this project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as prescribed under Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines (no potential for causing a significant effect on the environment) and Section 15378(b)(5) (administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment), therefore, no further environmental review is required. 10.The City Council hereby specifically finds and determines that, having considered the record as a whole, including the finding set forth above; there is no evidence before this City Council that the Development Code Amendment proposed herein will have the potential of an adverse effect on the wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Based upon substantial evidence, this City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effects contained in Section 753.5 (d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. B. ORDINANCE NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar does hereby ordain as follows: Section 22.10.030 TABLES 2-5 AND 2-6 Commercial/Industrial zoning district land uses and permit requirements. Article II, Title 22 of the City of Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 2 OAResolutions & Ord-CC\DCA PL2013-022 CC Ord 6-18-13.doc TABLE 2-5 ALLOWED USES AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR OFFICE ZONING DISTRICTS TABLE 2-6 ALLOWED USES AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS Permit Requirement by District 1See Standards in LAND USE 1 OP OB 3 CO iSection: C-3 i _ RETAIL TRADE USES Alcoholic beverage sales, off- RETAIL TRADE USES Alcoholic beverage sales, off- site, in conjunction with the sale CUP CUP CUP CUP of motor fuel (5) CUP of motor fuel (3) TABLE 2-6 ALLOWED USES AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS Section 22.10.030 Table 2-5, footnotes pertaining to permit requirements. Article II, Title 22 of the City of Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended by revising the following note regarding the distance criteria: (5) Shall be a minimum of 150 feet, measured from the nearest property lines, from any public or private elementary, middle or high school as defined by Education Code Section 49430 or any equivalent private school performing the function of such schools. Section 22.10.030 Table 2-6, footnotes pertaining to permit requirements. Article II, Title 22 of the City of Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended by revising the following note regarding the distance criteria: (3) Shall be a minimum of 150 feet, measured from the nearest property lines, from any public or private elementary, middle or high school as defined by Education Code Section 49430 or any equivalent private school performing the function of such schools. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 18TH DAY OF JUNE 2013, BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. OAResolutions & Ord-CC\DCA PL2013-022 CC Ord 6-18-13.doc Permit Requirement by District See Standards LAND USEf1 C-1 C-2 C-3 i 1 n Section: RETAIL TRADE USES Alcoholic beverage sales, off- site, in conjunction with the sale CUP CUP CUP of motor fuel (3) Section 22.10.030 Table 2-5, footnotes pertaining to permit requirements. Article II, Title 22 of the City of Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended by revising the following note regarding the distance criteria: (5) Shall be a minimum of 150 feet, measured from the nearest property lines, from any public or private elementary, middle or high school as defined by Education Code Section 49430 or any equivalent private school performing the function of such schools. Section 22.10.030 Table 2-6, footnotes pertaining to permit requirements. Article II, Title 22 of the City of Diamond Bar Municipal Code is hereby amended by revising the following note regarding the distance criteria: (3) Shall be a minimum of 150 feet, measured from the nearest property lines, from any public or private elementary, middle or high school as defined by Education Code Section 49430 or any equivalent private school performing the function of such schools. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 18TH DAY OF JUNE 2013, BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. OAResolutions & Ord-CC\DCA PL2013-022 CC Ord 6-18-13.doc Jack Tanaka, Mayor I, Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was duly introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the 18th day of June, 2013, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 16th day of July, 2013, by the following vote: ATTEST: AYES: Council Members: NOES: Council Members: ABSENT: Council Members: ABSTAIN: Council Members: Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk City of Diamond Bar 4 OAResolutions & Ord-CC\DCA PL2013-022 CC Ord 6-18-13.doc Agenda # 6.7 Meeting Date: July 16, 2013 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT �nRPOR��� r98g TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council VIA: James DeStefano, City Manager f 4 TITLE: ADOPT RESOLUTION 2013 -XX CONSENTING TO THE INCLUSION OF PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY'S JURISDICTION IN THE CALIFORNIA HERO PROGRAM TO FINANCE DISTRIBUTED GENERATION RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES, ENERGY AND WATER EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENTS AND ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING INFRASTRUCTURE AND APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO A CERTAIN JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT RELATED THERETO. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: The San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG) and the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) have partnered to expand the WRCOG's California Home Energy Renovation Opportunity (HERO) Program to cities in Los Angeles County. The California Hero Program allows property owners to voluntarily enter into annual contractual property tax assessments to finance the installation of distributed generation renewable energy sources, energy efficiency, and/or water conservation improvements. Since its launch in late 2011, the Program has approved over $240 million in applications and has funded over $62 million in projects. Because of its success, the California HERO Program was developed as a turnkey program to save other California jurisdictions time and resources in developing a standalone program. Jurisdictions only need to adopt the attached resolution and amendment to the joint exercise of powers agreement related to the California HERO Program. Once adopted, residents in the City would be eligible to apply for funding through the program. The California HERO application process includes the following: • Residents apply either online or through a hard copy application. • If approved, the resident will receive an email indicating the maximum approval amount and information about the next steps. • Residents work with a licensed contractor to determine what Eligible Products to Install. The contractor will need to call a Program Representative to obtain approval for the products. • Financing Documents will be sent to residents. Once the documents are signed, notarized, and returned, the resident can begin installing Eligible Products. • Once all Eligible Products are installed, the resident will need to submit the signed Completion Certificate with all final invoices, permits, and other required attachments. After the Completion Certificate is reviewed and approved, Program Representatives will issue payment to your contractor. The proposed Resolution authorizes the City Manager to execute the accompanying Amendment to the WRCOG Joint Powers Agreement to add the City as an Associate Member. Once adopted, the HERO Program will undergo a validation process that upon completion will allow owners of property located within the City to participate in the program. This item is a continuance from the June 18 Council meeting in order to provide the entirety of the Resolution and accompanying Exhibit A for Council review. There are no costs to the City for participation. Prepared by: Reviewed s �~ Anthony Santos Rya cLean Sr. Management Analyst Assis ant to the City Manager Attachment: 1. Resolution 2013 -XX. 2. California Hero Program Frequently Asked Questions. RESOLUTION NO. 2013- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, CONSENTING TO THE INCLUSION OF PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY'S JURISDICTION IN THE CALIFORNIA HERO PROGRAM TO FINANCE DISTRIBUTED GENERATION RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES, ENERGY AND WATER EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENTS AND ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING INFRASTRUCTURE AND APPROVING THE AMENDMENT TO A CERTAIN JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT RELATED THERETO WHEREAS, the Western Riverside Council of Governments ("Authority") is a joint exercise of powers authority established pursuant to Chapter 5 of Division 7, Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California (Section 6500 and following) (the "Act') and the Joint Power Agreement entered into on April 1, 1991, as amended from time to time (the "Authority JPA"); and WHEREAS, Authority intends to establish the California HERO Program to provide for the financing of renewable energy distributed generation sources, energy and water efficiency improvements and electric vehicle charging infrastructure (the "Improvements") pursuant to Chapter 29 of the Improvement Bond Act of 1911, being Division 7 of the California Streets and Highways Code ("Chapter 29") within counties and cities throughout the State of California that elect to participate in such program; and WHEREAS, City of Diamond Bar (the "City') is committed to development of renewable energy sources and energy efficiency improvements, reduction of greenhouse gases, protection of our environment, and reversal of climate change; and WHEREAS, in Chapter 29, the Legislature has authorized cities and counties to assist property owners in financing the cost of installing Improvements through a voluntary contractual assessment program; and WHEREAS, installation of such Improvements by property owners within the jurisdictional boundaries of the counties and cities that are participating in the California HERO Program would promote the purposes cited above; and WHEREAS, the City wishes to provide innovative solutions to its property owners to achieve energy and water efficiency and independence, and in doing so cooperate with Authority in order to efficiently and economically assist property owners the City in financing such Improvements; and WHEREAS, Authority has authority to establish the California HERO Program, which will be such a voluntary contractual assessment program, as permitted by the Act, the Authority JPA, originally made and entered into April 1, 1991, as amended to date, and the Amendment to Joint Powers Agreement Adding the City of Diamond Bar as an Associate Member of the Western Riverside Council of Governments to Permit the Provision of Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Program Services within the City (the "JPA Amendment"), by and between Authority and the City, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit "A" hereto, to assist property owners within the incorporated area of the City in financing the cost of installing Improvements; and WHEREAS, the City will not be responsible for the conduct of any assessment proceedings; the levy and collection of assessments or any required remedial action in the case of delinquencies in the payment of any assessments or the issuance, sale or administration of any bonds issued in connection with the California HERO Program. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT: 1. This City Council finds,and declares that properties in the City's incorporated area will be benefited by the availability of the California HERO Program to finance the installation of Improvements. 2. This City Council consents to inclusion in the California HERO Program of all of the properties in the incorporated area within the City and to the Improvements, upon the request by and voluntary agreement of owners of such properties, in compliance with the laws, rules and regulations applicable to such program; and to the assumption of jurisdiction thereover by Authority for the purposes thereof. 3. The consent of this City Council constitutes assent to the assumption of jurisdiction by Authority for all purposes of the California HERO Program and authorizes Authority, upon satisfaction of the conditions imposed in this resolution, to take each and every step required for or suitable for financing the Improvements, including the levying, collecting and enforcement of the contractual assessments to finance the Improvements and the issuance and enforcement of bonds to represent and be secured by such contractual assessments. 4. This City Council hereby approves the JPA Amendment and authorizes the execution thereof by appropriate City officials. 5. City staff is authorized and directed to coordinate with Authority staff to facilitate operation of the California HERO Program within the City, and report back periodically to this City Council on the success of such program. 6. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. The City Clerk is directed to send a certified copy of this resolution to the Secretary of the Authority Executive Committee. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 16th day of July, 2013. Jack Tanaka, Mayor I, Tommye A. Cribbins, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2013- was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, California, at its adjourned regular meeting held on the 16th day of July, 2013, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: Tommye A. Cribbins, City Clerk EXHIBIT A AMENDMENT TO THE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT ADDING CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AS AN ASSOCIATE MEMBER OF THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS TO PERMIT THE PROVISION OF THE CALIFORNIA HERO PROGRAM SERVICES WITH SUCH CITY This Amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement ("JPA Amendment") is made and entered into on the 16 day of July, 2013, by City of Diamond Bar ("City") and the Western Riverside Council of Governments ("Authority') (collectively the "Parties"). RECITALS WHEREAS, Authority is a joint exercise of powers authority established pursuant to Chapter 5 of Division 7, Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California (Section 6500 and following) (the "Joint Exercise of Powers Act") and the Joint Power Agreement entered into on April 1, 1991, as amended from time to time (the "Authority JPA"); and WHEREAS, as of October 1, 2012, Authority had 18 member entities (the 'Regular Members"); and WHEREAS, Chapter 29 of the Improvement Bond Act of 1911, being Division 7 of the California Streets and Highways Code ("Chapter 29") to authorize cities, counties, and cities and counties to establish voluntary contractual assessment programs, commonly referred to as a Property Assessed Clean Energy ('PACE") program, to fund various renewable energy sources, energy and water efficiency improvements, and electric vehicle charging infrastructure (the "Improvements") that are permanently fixed to residential, commercial, industrial, agricultural or other real property; and WHEREAS, Authority intends to establish a PACE program to be known as the "California HERO Program" pursuant to Chapter 29 as now enacted or as such legislation may be amended hereafter, which will authorize the implementation of a PACE financing program for cities and county throughout the state; and WHEREAS, City desires to allow owners of property within its jurisdiction to participate in the California HERO Program and to allow Authority to conduct proceedings under Chapter 29 to finance Improvements to be installed on such properties; and WHEREAS, this JPA Amendment will permit City to become an associate member of Authority and to participate in California HERO Program for the purpose of facilitating the implementation of such program within the jurisdiction of City; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code sections 6500 et seq., the Parties are approving this JPA Agreement to allow for the provision of PACE services, including the operation of a PACE financing program, within the incorporated territory of City; and WHEREAS, the JPA Amendment sets forth the rights, obligations and duties of City and Authority with respect to the implementation of the California HERO Program within the incorporated territory of City. MUTUAL UNDERSTANDINGS NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions hereinafter stated, the Parties hereto agree as follows: A. JPA Amendment. 1. The Authority JPA. City agrees to the terms and conditions of the Authority JPA, attached. 2. Associate Membership. By adoption of this JPA Amendment, City shall become Associate Member of Authority on the terms and conditions set forth herein and the Authority JPA and consistent with the requirements of the Joint Exercise of Powers Act. The rights and obligations of City as an Associate Member are limited solely to those terms and conditions expressly set forth in this JPA Amendment for the purposes of implementing the California HERO Program within the incorporated territory of City. Except as expressly provided for by the this JPA Amendment, City shall not have any rights otherwise granted to Authority's Regular Members by the Authority JPA, including but not limited to the right to vote on matters before the Executive Committee or the General Assembly, right to amend or vote on amendments to the Authority JPA, and right to sit on committees or boards established under the Authority JPA or by action of the Executive Committee or the General Assembly, including, without limitation, the General Assembly and the Executive Committee. City shall not be considered a member for purposes of Section 9.1 of the Authority JPA. City shall not be bound by any subsequent amendments of the Authority JPA not expressly agreed to by City. 3. Rights of Authority. This JPA Amendment shall not be interpreted as limiting or restricting the rights of Authority under the Authority JPA. Nothing in this JPA Amendment is intended to alter or modify Authority Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program, the PACE Program administered by Authority within the jurisdictions of its Regular Members, or any other programs administered now or in the future by Authority, all as currently structured or subsequently amended. 4. Rights of City. This JPA Amendment shall be not interpreted as limiting or restricting the rights of City to establish parameters or limitation on upon the HERO Program as it is conducted within City's jurisdiction. B. Implementation of California HERO Program within City Jurisdiction. 1. Boundaries of the California HERO Program within City Jurisdiction. City shall determine and notify Authority of the boundaries of the incorporated territory within City's jurisdiction within which contractual assessments may be entered into under the California HERO Program (the "Program Boundaries"), which boundaries may include the entire incorporated territory of City or a lesser portion thereof, upon approval of same by City Council. 2. Determination of Eligible Improvements. Subject to any parameters or limitations provided in the resolution of City approving the conduct of the HERO Program within City's jurisdiction, Authority shall determine the types of distributed generation renewable energy sources, energy efficiency or water conservation improvements, electric vehicle charging infrastructure or such other improvements as may be authorized pursuant to Chapter 29 (the "Eligible Improvements") that will be eligible to be financed under the California HERO Program. 3. Establishment of California HERO Program. Authority will undertake such proceedings pursuant to Chapter 29 as shall be legally necessary to enable Authority to make contractual financing of Eligible Improvements available to eligible property owners with the California HERO Program Boundaries and will be solely responsible for the conduct of such proceedings. 4. Financing the Installation of Eligible Improvements. Upon approval of the conduct of the HERO Program within City's jurisdiction, Authority shall be solely responsible to develop and implement a plan for the financing of the purchase and installation of the Eligible Improvements under the California HERO Program. 5. Ongoing Administration. Authority shall be responsible for the ongoing administration of the California HERO Program, including but not limited to producing education plans to raise public awareness of the California HERO Program, soliciting, reviewing and approving applications from residential and commercial property owners participating in the California HERO Program, establishing contracts for residential, commercial and other property owners participating in such program, establishing and collecting assessments due under the California HERO Program, adopting and implementing any rules or regulations for the PACE program, and providing reports as required by Chapter 29. City will not be responsible for the conduct of any proceedings required to be taken under Chapter 29; the levy or collection of assessments or any required remedial action in the case of delinquencies in such assessment payments; or the issuance, sale or administration of the Bonds or any other bonds issued in connection with the California HERO Program. 6. Phased Implementation. The Parties recognize and agree that implementation of the California HERO Program as a whole can and may be phased as additional other cities and counties execute similar agreements. City entering into this JPA Amendment will obtain the benefits of and incur the obligations imposed by this JPA Amendment in its jurisdictional area, irrespective of whether cities or counties enter into similar agreements. C. Miscellaneous Provisions. 1. Withdrawal. Authority may withdraw from this JPA Amendment upon six (6) months written notice to City; provided, however, there is no outstanding indebtedness of Authority within City. The provisions of Section 6.2 of the Authority JPA shall not apply to City under this JPA Amendment. City may withdraw approval for conduct of the HERO Program within the jurisdictional limits of City upon thirty (30) written notice to WRCOG without liability to the Authority or any affiliated entity. City withdrawal shall not affect the validity of any voluntary assessment contracts (a) entered prior to the date of such withdrawal or (b) entered into after the date of such withdrawal so long as the applications for such voluntary assessment contracts were submitted to and approved by WRCOG prior to the date of City's notice of withdrawal. 2. Indemnification and Liability. Authority shall defend, indemnify and hold City and its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liabilities, losses, damages or injuries of any kind, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, to the extent arising out of the acts, errors or omissions of Authority or its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents in connection with the California HERO Program administered under this JPA Amendment, including without limitation the payment of expert witness fees and attorneys fees and other related costs and expenses, but excluding payment of consequential damages, provided that the Authority shall not be required to defend or indemnify City and its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents for City's sole negligence or willful misconduct. Without limiting the foregoing, Section 5.2 of the Authority JPA shall not apply to this JPA Amendment. In no event shall any of Authority's Regular Members or their officials, officers or employees be held directly liable for any damages or liability resulting out of this JPA Amendment. 3. Environmental Review. Authority shall be the lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act for any environmental review that may required in implementing or administering the California HERO Program under this JPA Amendment. 4. Cooperative Effort. City shall cooperate with Authority by providing information and other assistance in order for Authority to meet its obligations hereunder. City recognizes that one of its responsibilities related to the California HERO Program will include any permitting or inspection requirements as established by City. City's cooperation shall not be interpreted to require any approvals without appropriate review or that any discretionary authority of City be exercised other than as provided by law. 5. Notice. Any and all communications and/or notices in connection with this JPA Amendment shall be either hand -delivered or sent by United States first class mail, postage prepaid, and addressed as follows: Authority: Western Riverside Council of Governments 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor. MS1032 Riverside, CA 92501-3609 Att: Executive Director City: City of Diamond Bar 21810 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Attn: James DeStefano, City Manager 6. Entire Agreement. This JPA Amendment, together with the Authority JPA, constitutes the entire agreement among the Parties pertaining to the subject matter hereof. This JPA Amendment supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, among the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and contains all of the covenants and agreements among them with respect to said matters, and each Party acknowledges that no representation, inducement, promise of agreement, oral or otherwise, has been made by the other Party or anyone acting on behalf of the other Party that is not embodied herein. 7. Successors and Assigns. This JPA Amendment and each of its covenants and conditions shall be binding on and shall inure to the benefit of the Parties and their respective successors and assigns. A Party may only assign or transfer its rights and obligations under this JPA Amendment with prior written approval of the other Party, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. 8. Attorney's Fees. If any action at law or equity, including any action for declaratory relief is brought to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, each Party to the litigation shall bear its own attorney's fees and costs. 9. Governing Law. This JPA Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, as applicable. 10. No Third Party Beneficiaries. This JPA Amendment shall not create any right or interest in the public, or any member thereof, as a third party beneficiary hereof, nor shall it authorize anyone not a Party to this JPA Amendment to maintain a suit for personal injuries or property damages under the provisions of this JPA Amendment. The duties, obligations, and responsibilities of the Parties to this JPA Amendment with respect to third party beneficiaries shall remain as imposed under existing state and federal law. 11. Severability. In the event one or more of the provisions contained in this JPA Amendment is held invalid, illegal or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed severed from this JPA Amendment and the remaining parts of this JPA Amendment shall remain in full force and effect as though such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable portion had never been a part of this JPA Amendment. 12. Headings. The paragraph headings used in this JPA Amendment are for the convenience of the Parties and are not intended to be used as an aid to interpretation. 13. Amendment. This JPA Amendment may be modified or amended by the Parties at any time. Such modifications or amendments must be mutually agreed upon and executed in writing by both Parties. Verbal modifications or amendments to this JPA Amendment shall be of no effect. 14. Effective Date. This JPA Amendment shall become effective upon the execution thereof by the Parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this JPA Amendment to be executed and attested by their officers thereunto duly authorized as of the date first above written. WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS By: Date: Executive Committee Chair Western Riverside Council of Governments CITY OF DIAMOND BAR Date: Title Omhem Frequently Asked Questiol ATTACHMENT 2 March 12, 2013 Q: What is the HERO Program, and how does it work? A: HERO enables residential and commercial property owners to install energy and water efficient improvements and renewable energy systems by having a special assessment put on their property tax bill. Payments are made through their local county with their property taxes over time. Q: What types of home improvements are available under the Program? A: Over 150,000 products and services quality. Typical projects include: solar photovoltaic (PV) systems; energy efficient space heating, air cooling and ventilation (HVAC); cool roof systems; energy efficient windows, skylights, and doors; solar thermal water heating; air sealing and weatherization; insulation; water heating; indoor energy efficient light fixtures; and water efficiency measures. Q: What are the costs and benefits of joining HERO for my community? A: There are no hard costs to joining the HERO program and it does not require any dedicated staff resources to develop or implement the Program. Additionally, your community will see numerous economic benefits including; • Reduced energy consumption • Stimulated local businesses • Created/retained sustainable jobs • Lowered greenhouse gas emissions Q: Why should we choose HERO compared to another PACE program? A HERO is the nation's fastest-growing PACE program. By choosing HERO, your community is choosing a program with a proven track -record of stimulating economic growth. The program was developed with a network of home improvement contractors who count on HERO to build their businesses. They are creating new jobs everyday and planning on expanding into regions where HERO Financing is offered. HERO is not an exclusive program so you don't have to choose it over another program. We believe competition is an important benefit to consumers. Not only does it provide options like restaurants, gas stations or banks provide but it also increases overall demand because more companies are working harder to educate consumers on the benefits of a particular type of product or service. When there are multiple options to consider solution providers are forced to continually improve their product if they want to succeed in the marketplace. Q: What about Freddie/Fannie/FHFA? A: PACE legislation was adopted by the State of California to encourage the adoption of energy efficiency, renewable energy and water efficiency measures on homes and businesses. When the legislation was enacted, many people believed PACE was an attractive financing option due to its ability to automatically transfer payments to a new owner if the property sold. Freddie/Fannie/FHFA have indicated that they are not willing to purchase mortgages with PACE assessments on the property, therefore, property owners that sell or refinance to conforming loans may need to repay their assessment. The HERO Program works within this provision and we have found that property owners are comfortable attending to this if, and when, the situation should arise. For most property owners the most attractive benefits are low interest rates that are fixed, the ability to deduct the interest portion of the payments, the ability to select 5, 10, 15 and 20 year payment terms, and a simple straightforward application and document process to enable them to get the energy efficiency, renewable energy or water efficiency product they are interested in. Being able to transfer the balance of the financing has not proven to be a feature that has impacted a consumer's decision. Page 1 Omh a ' Frequently Asked Questions March 12, 2013 Whether or not this provision remains in place or is removed, HERO provides numerous benefits that make PACE an attractive financing option for consumers. Q: Who is the HERO Team? A: The HERO team is made up of a network of partners who have been working closely since January 2010 on active residential and commercial PACE programs. Each team member is uniquely qualified for their specific role and are industry experts within their field. air„p Public Financing Management Program Manager/ Financial Advisor p h 5A3I.\9 C:iPIT iL �� Best Best 8 Kreiger LLP Renovate America Somas Capital David T& n55octAmssoclates Westhoff, Cone 8 Hofmste 6ontl Counsel Resitlentiel Admin and Funding Commercial Admin and Funding Assessment Atlminisira[lon Placement Agent Q: Can the HERO Program be customized to my municipality? A: Yes, marketing materials, including the HERO website and contractor training materials, can be co -branded with your municipality s logo and contact information. Additionally, the HERO team will work with your municipality to review all policy considerations. Q: Can the HERO Program be integrated with existing municipal programs? A: Yes, the HERO Program can be integrated with existing municipal rebate, energy finance, or other PACE programs. Our team will work to implement the Program as a complementary component to other programs. Q: How does our community get started? A: Below are the process steps for HERO Financing to be offered in your community: 1 Approve Resolution Approval by municipality of the resolution will allow the HERO Program to operate in the municipality. The conduit issuer then completes a corresponding acceptance of the municipality to the Program. 2 Judicial Validation of City's Participation Program legal counsel files judicial validation documents. 3 Program Marketing and Outreach During the program validation phase, team members initiate local marketing efforts and begin outreach to educate local contractors and property owners of funding availability, eligibility and application procedures. 4 Program Launch Upon completion of the validation process, the HERO Program launches and projects are able to apply for and receive funding. Page 2 CITY COUNCIL ``" \ RPOII�S�n TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council VIA: James DeStefano, City Manager 1�iAD Agenda # Meeting Date: July 16, 2013 AGENDA REPORT TITLE: EXTENSION OF CITY-WIDE GRAFFITI REMOVAL CONTRACT WITH GRAFFITI CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013-14 IN THE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $59,280 RECOMMENDATION: Approve. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Funds for this contract are included within the adopted Fiscal Year 2013-14 Budget. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: On May 19, 1993, the City Council awarded a contract to Graffiti Control Systems for graffiti removal in Diamond Bar. Section 13 of the specifications of the contract allows the City Council to extend the contract on an annual basis if doing so is deemed to be in the best interest of the City. Since the original contract was awarded, the City Council has approved the annual extension of the contract. Graffiti Control Systems has requested to continue the flat rate structure of $4,940 per month regardless of the number of graffiti incidents each month. Staff is recommending that the contract be extended for FY 2013-14 in the amount not to exceed $59,280. This amount should be sufficient for required graffiti removal services, plus additional as -needed work requested by the Public Works Division, such as cleaning paint spills upon public streets. Graffiti Control Systems has proven that they can satisfactorily perform the specifications of the contract. Prepared by: Greg Gubman, AICP Community Development Director Attachments: 1. Contract Extension Letter 2. Original Contract Jack Tanaka Mayor Ron Everett Mayor Pro Tem Ling -Ling Chang Council Member Carol Herrera Council Member Steve Tye Council Member 2013 Attachment 1 21810 Copley Drive ® Diamond Bar, C4 91765-4178 Graffiti Control Systems 7260 Atoll Avenue North Hollywood, CA 91606 Re: Graffiti Removal Contract (909) 839-9000 ® Fax (909) 861-3717 www.DiarnondBarCA.gov This confirms your agreement with the City that in accordance with Section 13 of the specifications of our contract dated May 19, 1993, the City of Diamond Bar is interested in extending the Graffiti Removal Contract with Graffiti Control Systems from July 1, 2013, through June 30, 2014, for a flat rate fee of $4,940 per month. Total work for the fiscal year will be in an amount not to exceed $59,280. Upon approval of this contract extension by the Diamond Bar City Council, a purchase order in the amount not to exceed $59,280 will be processed and forwarded to you. By signing below, the parties agree to the above terms. Jack Tanaka, Mayor City of Diamond Bar Attest: City Clerk s ii i i6 V, ontrol Systems Approved as to Form: City Attorney KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS and entered into, in duplicate, as and the Mayor, by and between Attachment 2 That the following agreement is made of the date executed by the City Clerk hereinafter referred to as the "CONTRACTOR" and the California, hereinafter referred to as "City". ty of Diamond Bar, WHEREAS, pursuant to Notice Inviting Sealed Bids or Proposals, bids were received, publicly opened, and declared on the date specified in said notice; and WHEREAS, City did accept the bid from Contractor Graffiti Control Systems and; WHEREAS, City has authorized the City Clerk and Mayor to enter into a written contract with Contractor for furnishing labor, equipment, and material for graffiti removal in the City of Diamond Bar. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, it is agreed: 1. GENERAL SCOPE OF WORK: Contractor shall furnish all necessary labor, tools, materials, appliances, and equipment for and do the work for graffiti removal in the City of Diamond Bar. Said work to be performed in accordance with specifications and standards on file in the office of the City Manager and in accordance with bid prices hereinafter mentioned and in accordance with the instructions of the City Manager. 2. INCORPORATED DOCUMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED COMPLEMENTARY: The aforesaid specifications are incorporated herein by reference thereto and made a part hereof with like force and effect as if all of said documents were set forth in full herein. Said documents, the Resolution Inviting Bids attached hereto, together with this written agreement, shall constitute the contract betweer, the parties., This contract is intended to require complete and finished Fork for each removal assignmqnt and anything necessary to complete the work -properly and in accordance with the law and lawful governmental regulations shall be performed by the contractor whether set out specifically in the contract or not. Should it be ascertained that any inconsistency exists between the aforesaid documents and this written agreement, the provisions of this written agreement shall control. 3. TERMS OF CONTRACT a. The undersigned bidder agrees to execute the contract within ten (10) calendar days from the date of notice of award of the contract or upon notice by City after ten (10) calendar days from the date of notice of award of the contract or upon notice by City after the 10 calendar days, and to 15 complete the work of each removal assignment within twenty- four hours of assignment. The bidder agrees further to the assessment of liquidated damages in the amount indicated in item 6 of the attachment for assignments that remain incomplete beyond the scheduled completion time. 'City may deduct the amount thereof from any monies due or that may become due the Contractor under this contract. Progress payments made after the scheduled date of completion shall not constitute a waiver of liquidated damages.' 4. INSURANCE: The Contractor shall not commence work -under this contract until he has obtained all insurance required hereunder in a company or companies acceptable to City nor shall the Contractor allow any subcontractor to commence work on his subcontract until all insurance required of the subcontractor has been obtained. The contractor shall take out and maintain at all times during the life of this contract the following policies of insurance: a. Compensation Insurance: Before beginning work, the Contractor shall furnish to the Engineer a certificate of insurance as proof that he has taken out full compensation insurance for all persons whom he may employ directly or through subcontractors in carrying out the work specified herein, in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Such insurance shall be maintained in full force and effect during the period covered by this contract. In accordance with the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code, every contractor shall secure the payment of compensation to his employees. Contractor, prior to commencing work, shall sign and file with the City a certification as follows: "I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for worker's compensation or to undertake self insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of work of this contract." b. For .all operations of the Contractor or any subcontractor in performing tue work provided for herein, insurance with the following minimum limits and coverage: 1) Public Liability - Bodily Injury (not auto) $500,000 each person; $1,000,000 each accident. 2) Public Liability - Property Damage (not auto) $250,000 each person; $500,000 aggregate. 3) Contractor's Protective - Bodily Injury $500,000 each person; $1,000,000 each accident. 4) Contractor's Protective - Property Damage $250,000 each accident; $5oo,000 aggregate. 16 5) Automobile - Bodily Injury $500,000 each person; $1,000,000 each accident. 6) Automobile - Property Damage $250,000 each accident. C. Each such policy of insurance provided for in paragraph b. shall• 1) Be issued by an insurance ,company approved in writing by City, which is qualified to do business in the State of California. 2) Name as additional insured the City of Diamond Bar, it officers, agents and employees, and any other parties specified in the bid documents to be so included; 3) Specify'it acts as primary insurance and that no insurance held or owned by the designated additional insured shall be called upon to cover a loss under said policy; 4) Contain a clause substantially in the following words: "It is hereby understood and agreed that this policy may not be canceled nor the amount of the coverage thereof reduced until thirty (30) days after receipt of a registered letter." 5) Otherwise be in form satisfactory to City. d. The policy of insurance provided for in subparagraph a. shall contain an endorsement which: 1) Waives all right of subrogation against all persons and entities specified in subparagraph 4.c.(2) hereof to.be listed as additional insureds in the policy of insurance provided for in paragraph b, by reason of any claim arising out of or connected with the operations of Contractor or any subcontractor in Performing the work provided for herein; 2) Provides it shall not be canceled or altered without thirty (30) days written notice thereof given to City by registered mail. The Contractor shall at the time of the execution of the contract present the original policies of insurance required in paragraphs a. and b. hereof, or present a certificate of the insurance company, showing the issuance of such insurance, and the additional insureds and other provisions required herein. 5. PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with tue provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 an& 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the 17 general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, 21660 E. Copley Drive, Suite 100, Diamond Bar, California, and are available to any interested party on request. City also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to City; not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for ,any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the -,,:provisions of said Labor Code. 6. APPRENTICESHIP EMPLOYMENT: In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statues of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California Apprenticeship council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices and the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ration of apprentices journeymen that will be used in performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: a. W;.en unemployment in the area of coverage b the joint arorenticeship committee has exceeded an ave^rage of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, oz b. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five,, or C. When the trade can show it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on a annual basis statewide or locally, or d. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen_.- _ The Contractor is required to make contribution to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship M. programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex -officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. 7. LEGAL HOURS OF WORK- Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract, and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to City, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him, or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said '-borer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than ht (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. 8. TRAVEL AND SUBSISTENCE PAY• Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. 9. CONTRACTOR'S LIABILITY• The City of Diamond Bar and its officers, agents and employees shall not be answerable or accountable in any manner for any loss or damage that may happen to the work or any part thereof, or for any of the materials or other things used or employed in performing the- work; or for injury or damage to any person or,property resulting from defects or obstructions or from any cause whatsoever, except the sole negligence or willful misconduct of City, its employees, servants,. or independent contractors Who are directly responsible to City during the progress of the work or at any time before its completion and final acceptance. The Contractor will indemnify City against and will hold and save City harmless from any and all actions, claims, damages to persons or property, penalties, obligations, or liabilities that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm, entity, corporation, political subdivision, or other organization arising out of or in connection with the work, operation, or activities of the contractor, his agents, employees, F contractors, or invitees provided for herein, whether or not there is c,,,.current passive -or active negligence on the part of City, but excluding such actions, claims, damages to persons or property, penalties, 19 obligations, or liabilities arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of City, its employees, servants, or independent contractors who are directly responsible to City, and in connection therewith: a. The Contractor will defend any action or actions filed in connection with any of said claims, damages, penalties, obligations, liabilities and will pay all costs and expenses, including attorneys' fees incurred in connection therewith. b. The Contractor will promptly pay any judgement rendered against the Contractor or City covering such claims, damages, penalties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with such work, operations, or activities of the Contractor hereunder, and the Contractor agrees to save and hold the City harmless therefrom. C. In the event city, without fault, is made a party to any action or proceeding filed or prosecuted against the. Contractor for damages or other claims arising out of or in connection with the work, operation, or activities of the Contractor hereunder, the Contractor agrees to pay City any and all costs and expenses incurred by City in such action or proceeding together with reasonable attorneys' fees.. So much of the money due to the Contractor under and by virtue of the contract as shall be considered necessary by City may be retained by City until disposition has been made of such action or claims for damage as aforesaid. lo. NON-DISCRIMINATION: No discrimination shall be made in the employment of persons upon public works because of the race, color, or religion of such persons, and every contractor for public works violating this section is subject to all the penalties imposed for a violation of Division 2, Part 7 Chapter 1 of the Labor Code in accordance with the provisions of Section 1735 of said Code. 11. CONTRACT PRICE AND PAYMENT: City sha;l pay to the.Contractor for furnishing all material and doing the prescribe' work the unit prices set forth in the Price,schedule in accordance with C.mtractor's Proposal dated March 5, 1593. 12. ATTORNEY'S FEES: In the.event that any action or proceeding is brought by either party to enforce any term or provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall recover its reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred with respect thereto. 13. TERMINATION: This Agreement may be terminated by the City upon the giving of a written "Notice of Termination" to Contractor at least ten (10) days prior to the date of termination specified in said notice. In the event of such termination, Contractor shall only be paid for, services rendered and expenses necessarily incurred prior to the effective date of termination. 20 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to duly executed with all the formalities required by law on the respective nates set forth opposite their signatures. State of California (0�g6 Contractor's License No. Date Date By: T' le Title CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, C FORNIA By: iz 1 I Mayor By: City Clem Contractor's Business Phone_ (800) 794-7384 or (818) 982-8480 Emergency Phone at which Contractor can be reached at any time_ 1 21 CITY COUNCIL Agenda # 6.9 Meeting Date: July 16 2013 AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council VIA: James DeStefano, City Manage TITLE: Authorize the City Manager to approve mendment No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with SJC 3 Consultants in the amount of $30,000 to administer the City's Home Improvement Program (HIP) for FY 2013-14. RECOMMENDATION: Approve FINANCIAL IMPACT: The FY 2013-14 CDBG Program Budget includes a $150,000 allocation to the City's Home Improvement Program (HIP). Per Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) guidelines, the maximum amount available for administrative costs is 20% of the HIP program budget ($30,000). The City has a three-year agreement with SJC3 Consultants to administer the Home Improvement Program. Last year, Council authorize $30,000 for this work, therefore with approval of Amendment 2, Council will authorize a total contract cost of $60,000 to this vendor over a two-year period. BACKGROUND: The purpose of the Home Improvement Program is to preserve and enhance single family residential neighborhoods throughout the City. Through the provision of grants and loans, eligible homeowners of single family detached dwellings can correct hazardous structural conditions; make modifications necessary to provide handicapped access; improve the overall exterior appearance of the home; and correct exterior code violations. Individuals must meet the County's guidelines for low or moderate income to be eligible to participate in the program Eligible participants may apply for grants of up to $5,000 and deferred loans of up to $10,000 for repairs to owner -occupied homes. In addition, emergency grants of up to $2,000 are available on an as needed basis. DISCUSSION Following a request for proposal process, the City entered into a three-year agreement with SJC3 Consulting (SJC3) to administer the Program beginning in July 2012. Program administration includes reviewing applications for funding from interested Diamond Bar residents, requesting and reviewing financial information for persons that may qualify, determine the eligibility of program participants, conducting home inspections, drafting construction documents, reviewing contractor bids, awarding construction contracts, and processing funding requests for completed projects. Through approval of this contract amendment, SJC3 Consultants will continue to provide this service through FY 2013-14. PREPARED BY: David Doyle, Asst. City Manager Attachment: AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE FY 2012-13 CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH SJC3 CONSULTING FOR MANAGEMENT ANDADMINISTRATION OF THE CITY'S HOME IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (HIP) FUNDED THROUGH FEDERAL CDBG FUNDS This Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement is made and entered into this 16th day of July 2013 , between the CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, a Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "CITY") and SJC 3 CONSULTANTS (hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT".) A. Recitals: (i) The CITY has heretofore entered into an agreement, dated July 17, 2012, with CONSULTANT to provide planning consulting services (hereinafter referred to as the "AGREEMENT".) (ii) The AGREEMENT specifies that it is for services with a cost not -to -exceed $20,000 for FY 2009-10 (iii) In April 2013 Amendment No. 1 was approved increasing the contract to $30,000 for FY 2012-13. (iii) It is in the City's best interest to amend the AGREEMENT to increase the not -to - exceed amount for the services in order to ensure consistency and continuity of the services already being provided by CONSULTANT and to allow the expenditure of additional HIP funds to needy community members throughout FY 2013-14. NOW THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and CONSULTANT: Section 1: Paragraph No. 2 of the AGREEMENT is hereby amended to read as follows: TIME OF PERFORMANCE This agreement shall commence as of July 17, 2012 and shall remain in full force and effect until June 30, 2014. The Agreement may be extended upon request and approval by the CITY on an annual basis for an additional twelve (12) months until June 2015 Section 2: Paragraph No. 3 of the AGREEMENT is hereby amended to read as follows: 3. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT The services to be completed under this Agreement shall be compensated in accordance with the Schedule of Hourly Billing Rates set forth in Exhibit "A" with a not to exceed maximum of $ 30,000 in Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds for the services performed for FY 2013-14 and a total contract authorization over the two year period from July 2012 to June 2014 of $60,000. Section 2: Each party to this Amendment acknowledges that no representation by any party, which is not embodied herein, or any other agreement, statement, or promise not contained in this Amendment shall be valid and binding. Any modification of this Amendment shall be effective only if it is in writing signed by the parties. Section 3: All other terms and conditions of the AGREEMENT shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 1 as of the day and year first set forth above: City of Diamond Bar MIN SJC 3 Consulting James DeStefano, City Manager Regina Collins, Principal ATTEST Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL Agenda # 6.10LqJ Meeting Date: July 16 2013 AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council VIA: James DeStefano, City Manager W_ TITLE: APPROVAL OF CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 1 WITH ALAMEDA CORRIDOR -EAST (ACE) CONSTRUCTION AUTHORITY REGARDING THE CONSTRUCTION OF FAIRWAY DRIVE GRADE SEPARATION PROJECT. RECOMMENDATION: Approve. FINANCIAL IMPACT: In accordance with the original agreement, dated July 18, 2000, ACE will reimburse Diamond Bar for reasonable expenses related to the Fairway Drive Grade Separation Project. At this time, we anticipate an expense of $21,390 for the review of the Transportation Management Plan. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The proposed Fairway Drive Grade Separation Project would lower Fairway Drive under the two existing Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) and Metrolink tracks in the City of Industry and unincorporated area of Los Angeles County, immediately north of the SR - 60 Freeway. A four -lane roadway underpass, retaining walls and a new railroad bridge with two existing tracks and possibly one future freight railroad track would be constructed. Business Parkway and Walnut Drive North would be lowered at their intersections with Fairway Drive (See Exhibit A). According to ACE, the project would reduce traffic congestion by an estimated 27.6 vehicles -hours of delay each day resulting from idling vehicles when gate arms are lowered at the crossing for 49 trains per day, projected to increase to 91 trains per day by 2025. The project would also reduce emission and eliminate locomotive horn and crossing bell noise at the crossing. The original agreement with ACE Construction Authority was approved by the City Council on July 18, 2000. The City and ACE desire to amend the existing agreement to include the grade separation of the UPRR and Fairway Drive Crossing, as well as other modifications (See Exhibit B). In order to minimize the traffic impacts during construction, a Transportation Management Plan (TMP) for the Fairway Drive Grade Separation Project has been prepared for review/approval. Staff has retained KOA (City's traffic consultant) to review the TMP and provide recommendations. The project schedule is tentatively set as follows: Construction Schedule Last Quarter of 2014 Project Completion Last Quarter of 2017 PREPARED BY: Christian Malpica, Associate Engineer Date Prepared: July 11, 2013 REVIEWED BY: David G. Lid Director of Public Works Attachment: Exhibit A - Project Location Exhibit B - City -ACE Contract Amendment No.1 2 B v O cfi In G n s "S `ib 'tel 'E C\ 9p4nc y Op p` ac 88Y LU ac m yy alc P JP o O< J G law o ~lxPa r x pbaa hhq cn �\ � _ .aYu e+�� Sneaetl WaW nd n CL q ' ® Slemon Ave— Aloe "� 2 rp tv4o, � PG o C eg = CL _ le e%,�" z`p TC Pe P N PFJ a'An 'y 'LO cCCo 'w.,E m o"cii. ..d o` CPC n• e w ^� a� s, (ai e vn xH reh 3 M1 - tS LL z "� IS sa�aWp e c Noyales 5\ Na9n a e vor,e EXHIBIT "B" AMENDMENT No. 1 TO THE AGREEMENT DATED JULY 18, 2000 BETWEEN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AND THE ALAMEDA CORRIDOR -EAST CONSTRUCTION AUTHORITY REGARDING THE CONSTRUCTION OF GRADE CROSSING SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS AND GRADE SEPARATION PROJECTS BY THE ALAMEDA CORRIDOR -EAST CONSTRUCTION AUTHORITY This Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement dated July 18, 2000 Regarding the Construction of Grade Crossing Safety Improvements and Grade Separation Projects by the Alameda Corridor -East Construction Authority (the "Amendment") is dated as of day of , 2013, by and between the City of Diamond Bar ("CITY"), amunicipal corporation, and the Alameda Corridor -East Construction Authority of the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments, a California Joint Powers Authority, hereinafter referred to -as "ACE". RECITALS: A. The CITY and ACE on July 18, 2000 entered into Agreement Regarding the Construction of Grade Crossing Safety Improvements and Grade Separation Projects by the Alameda _ Corridor -East Construction Authority ("Agreement") for improvements at various street crossings of the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR). B. On August 23, 2010, the ACE Board approved the initiation of the preliminary engineering and environmental analysis for the design of the Fairway Drive grade separation project. C. On March 15, 2012, the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments approved the ACE Phase 2 grade separation projects, including a grade separation of the UPRR and Fairway Drive crossing. D. The CITY and ACE desire to amend the existing AGREEMENT to include the grade separation of the UPRR and Fairway Drive crossing, as well as other modifications and updates. AGREEMENT: NOW, THEREFORE, the CITY and ACE mutually agree as follows: 1. The "RECIFALS" paragraph of the existing Agreement is hereby amended as follows: `Exhibit "A"' is modified to `Exhibits "A and B"'. 2. Paragraph5 under Section II of the existing Agreement is hereby amended to: "To take title to all real property or other property acquired for the Project that are not specifically dedicated to the Union Pacific Railroad Company." 3. Line 4 of Paragraph 3 under Section III of the Existing Agreement is hereby amended to: "..by the proposed work shown in Exhibit "A" and Exhibit `B"". 4. The last sentence of Paragraph 12 under Section III of the existing Agreement is hereby amended to: "ACE will not be liable for any costs, damages, or liabilities associated with the subsequent reuse, storage, reclamation, or reinstallation of CITY COUNCIL Agenda It Meeting Date: July 16 2013 AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of tha City Council VIA: James DeStefano, City Manager TITLE: APPROVAL OF CONTRACTAMEN MENT NO. 3 WITH KOA CORPORATION TO PROVIDE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICE FOR ALAMEDA CORRIDOR -EAST CONTRUCTION AUTHORITY'S (ACE) FAIRWAY DRIVE GRADE SEPARATION PROJECT, IN THE AMOUNT OF $21,390. RECOMMENDATION: Approve. FINANCIAL IMPACT: KOA's proposed review fee of $21,390 will be reimbursed by ACE. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: ACE manages multiple construction projects that encompass rail safety upgrades and railroad grade separation projects w4hin the San Gabriel and Pomona Valleys. Fairway Drive Grade Separation Project is one of several projects managed by ACE. This project would lower Fairway Drive under the two existing Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) and Metrolink tracks in the City of Industry and unincorporated area of Los Angeles County, immediately north of the SR -60 Freeway. (See Exhibit A). In order to minimize the traffic impacts during construction, ACE has prepared a Transportation Management Plan (TMP), and forwarded it to the City for review. The TMP proposes to detour a portion of the traffic through Diamond Bar (Walnut Drive and Lemon Ave.) during a 26 -month closure at the railroad tracks. KOA has been providing as needed on-call traffic engineering support to the City since 2010. Because of the firm's familiarity with the operations of Diamond Bar traffic signals and Traffic Management Center functionality, it will be beneficial to use KOA's services to review and provide recommendations back to staff. The proposed services will be in accordance with the attached KOA's fee proposal (See Exhibit B). In FY 2013-2014, staff is anticipating an encumbrance of $25,000 for on-call services with KOA Corporation. This additional service effort of $21,390 to review the TMP will bring the total contract value to $46,390, which will exceeds the City Manager's authority of $25,000. Therefore, Public Works Department is requesting City Council approval of the attached Contract Amendment No. 3. The TMP review will include the following: • General TMP review and comments • Plans and specifications package review • Traffic signal construction support • Signal retiming and adjustment during project construction and new timing plan for the Signal • Review of traffic control plans and other striping plans PREPARED BY: Christian Malpica, Associate Engineer REVIEWED BY: X' David Liu, ['Director of Public Works Date Prepared: July 11, 2013 Attachment: Exhibit A — Project Location Exhibit B — Contract Amendment No.3 with KOA's proposal, dated July 9, 3013 4 eW eW AveG` Jia ., o iv O �� 3 IY Avn v c un va - i S YaIaFON 9 N e nusM1'ai T n G 9xr n ry z ar M _ m ¢ 0 o a lF erJeJe Gr 2 oi9 CL \KH, oeeT � Vu e� T� vU Wo pave�n G C � �@ 5 / maA � Brea Canyon Nva? n Id S � 3/1 Vd Iii Fw+tl ebveiD i�A l7 oAv' �� „wa �i q � feu va 3 3m EXHIBIT "B" AMENDMENT NO. 3 ON-CALL CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT This Amendment No.3 to the On -Call Consulting Services Agreement is made and entered into this 16th day of July, 2013 between the CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, a Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "CITY') and KOA Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT'). A. RECITALS: (i) The CITY has heretofore entered into an Agreement, with CONSULTANT to provide professional engineering services, which the Agreement was dated October 26, 2010. (ii.) The CONSULTANT submitted a proposal, a full, true and correct copy of which is attached hereto as Attachment "A" to review the TMP for the Fairway Drive Grade Separation Project. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and CONSULTANT: Section 1: Section 1. A. Scope of Services of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: "A. Scope of Services. The nature and scope of the specific services to be performed by Consultant are as described in Attachment "A", dated July 9, 2013, to review the TMP for the Fairway Drive Grade Separation Project. Section 2: Section 3 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: Compensation. "City agrees to compensate Consultant for each service which Consultant performs to the satisfaction of City in compliance with the schedule set forth in Attachment "A". Payment will be made only after submission of proper invoices in the form specified by the City." Section 3: Each party to this Amendment No. 3 acknowledges that no representation by any party which is not embodied herein nor any other agreement, statement, or promise not contained in this Amendment No. 3 shall be valid and binding. Any modification of this Amendment No. 3 shall be effective only if it is in writing signed by the parties. Total payment to Consultant pursuant to this Amendment shall not exceed ($21,390.00) dollars. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 3 as of the day and year first set forth above: APPROVED AS TO FORM By: City Attorney ATTEST: CITY OF DIAMOND BAR Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk DATE: CONSULTANT: KOA Corporation Min Zhou, P.E. Vice President Jack Tanaka, Mayor 2 ATTACHMENT "A" KOA CORPORATION '�..k PLANINING & ENGINEERING July 9, 2013 Mr. Christian Malpica City of Diamond Bar 21825 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 MB33039 Subject: Fairway Drive Transportation Management Plan Review for the City of Diamond Bar, California Dear Mr. Malpica, KOA Corporation is pleased to submit the following proposal to provide professional engineering services for reviewing the Transportation Management Plan for the Fairway Drive Grade Separation Project. The report is prepared for the Alameda Corridor East Construction Authority. The purpose of the review is to comment on the report regarding the construction -related traffic impacts and proposed mitigation attributable to those impacts on City streets, in particular, Lemon Avenue and Walnut Drive. KOA has earned a reputation for high quality work, fulfillment of deadlines, and reasonable costs. While we have six offices in Southern California, our Orange office will manage this project. The firm has coverage in the following areas: Professional Liability ($2 million), Automobile Liability ($1 million) and General Liability ($5 million). Our Worker's Compensation coverage meets the insurance requirements of California State Law. We have successfully completed review of similar types of projects for numerous public agencies and private parties. We have prepared the following scope of work based on our understanding of the project and discussion with City staff. Please contact me or Benjamin Chan, the Project Manager, if you have any questions or if you require additional information regarding the subject proposal. I look forward to working with you on this important project. If you concur with the terms of this proposal, you may authorize KOA to begin work, by signing the authorization on this proposal and returning it to our office. The proposal is valid for 90 days. Sincerely, Min Zhou, P.E. Vice President, OC Operations O: IProposais120131shutieslMB33039 DB -Fairway TMP MKOA CORPORATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING Background The purpose of the Fairway Drive Grade Separation Project is to increase safety at the existing at -grade railroad crossing by grade -separating Fairway Drive at the Union Pacific Railroad, eliminating the vehicle -train conflict. Construction is scheduled to begin in 2014. The construction duration is estimated to be 40 months. Fairway Drive is located outside the City boundary. When Fairway Drive is closed during construction, detour traffic will be routed through Nogales Street and Lemon Avenue. There are a total of five construction stages for this project. The first and second stages of the project do not require full closure of Fairway Avenue. Traffic impacts on City streets for these two stages are minimal. During Stage 3, 4 and 5 of the project, Fairway Avenue is close to traffic. To facilitate detoured traffic during Fairway Drive closure on Lemon Avenue, a temporary traffic signal will be constructed at Lemon Avenue and Walnut Drive. Scope of Services Task I — General Review of the submitted Transportation Management Report (TMP) KORA will prepare a technical memorandum to City staff upon completion of our review. The memorandum will document our comments relating to the traffic analysis approach, methodology, assumptions, findings and recommendations discussed in the TMP report. Task II — Temporary Signal Warrant Evaluation and Assessment at Lemon Avenue and Walnut Drive KORA will evaluate the traffic information provided in the Fairway Drive TMP. KOA follows federal and state guidelines called signal warrants that help engineers weigh the impact of a traffic signal on motorists. Eleven warrants are assessed when studying a location. KORA will prepare a memorandum discussing our assessment of the temporary signal construction. Task III — PS&E Package Review KOA will review and comment on the PS&E package prepared for the project. However, our comment will be restricted to the activities proposed to be implemented within the City boundary (i.e. temporary signal at Lemon Avenue and Walnut Drive). Task IV — Temporary Traffic Signal Construction Support KOA will provide construction support during construction of the temporary traffic signal at Lemon Avenue and Walnut Drive. The support will include: Attend one kick-off meeting and two construction meetings. Assume three (3) days of inspection services are needed, which includes installation of new foundations, new traffic signal pole and signal mast arm installation, and controller and other traffic signal equipment and devices. Task V — Signal Retiming and Adjustment during Project Construction and New Timing Plan for Temorary Signal at Lemon Avenue and Walnut Drive. KOA will adjust signal timings, as needed, at Lemon Avenue and Washington Boulevard and Lemon Avenue and Golden Springs Drive to accommodate detoured traffic due the closure of the Fairway Drive for construction. KOA will also prepare new timing plan for the new signal. Unless directed otherwise, KOA will use the timing 2 KOA CORPORATION PLANNING & ENGihtE EftENG parameters and standards adopted in the 2012 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. It is assumed that the traffic count and any other relevant data will be provided by the City. No new traffic signal counts are included in the work scope. KOA will implement the approved signal timing sheet including fine turning of the timing upon activation of the new signal operation. Task VI - Review of Worksite Traffic Control Plans for Stage 3 4 and 5 KOA will review traffic control plans for lane closures on City streets during Stages 3, 4 and 5 of the project. Our estimate for this task includes one preliminary and one final review of each plan set. Unless directed otherwise, KOA will use the current WATCH manual as the guidelines for signing and striping layout. Work site traffic control plans will only include areas affected by the construction zone to the extent necessary to effectively control traffic through the zone. Our review of the detour traffic plans will not include whether the design is sufficiently to move traffic around the closure area with minimal disruption to adjacent land uses Out of Scope Work Service rendered for out -of -scope work will be billed based on a time and material basis. A fee schedule is attached with this proposal for out -of -scope. Out -of -scope work includes: • Requests, by the City for items not covered in work program tasks described in this proposal. • Extra work effort required due to changes in the project scope or conditions after KOA starts work. • Review of temporary or permanent street improvement plan and/or street lighting plan. • Preparation of temporary construction easement or permanent maintenance easement documents. • Any pot -holing or underground investigation of utilities. • Presentations at public meetings. • Any traffic count collection. • Analysis of additional study intersections or residential street segments not identified in the current 85% TMP. • Preparation of engineering designs for mitigation measures not identified in the current 85% TMP. • Attendance at formal in-person meetings or participation in extended conference calls with the City or the Client, or attendance at public hearings. Exclusions The following exclusions describe situations that we frequently encounter that result in the need for extra work and additional compensation: • Attendance at additional public hearings, Council and/or other stakeholder meetings, except as specifically indicated in the scope of services, will be considered as additional work and billed accordingly. • Our approach assumes a consensus regarding the need for this project. We have not allocated any resources to achieving a consensus regarding the need for improvements. • Significant changes in the approving agencies' design standards and policies after the plans were reviewed by the agencies and that result in revising completed designs. 3 K®A CORPORATION PLANNiNC & ENGVFER3NG • The proposed fee does not include any costs or fees charged for KOA's review of traffic modeling services or model runs. • KOA reserves the right to request extra work fees if the City comments or requests to ACE exceed the original scope of services and/or what is reasonable. Unreasonable comments include (but are not limited to) analysis of additional locations, re -analyze the project impacts using different sets of methodologies or assumptions than that assumed in the report, delays caused by impasses between ACE and the City and unwillingness by ACE and the City in reaching a consensus of comments. Figure A — Project Site 4 KOA CORPORATION .` PLANNING & tNGIWERING Project Management Mr. Benjamin Chan will manage the project with support from staff at our Orange Office. Schedule The entire project from the initiation to final review phase will be approximately 40 months, anticipated to begin in July, 2013. Proposed Fee The lump sum fee for the proposed scope of work is $21,390 (see Exhibit A for cost breakdown). This fee is based upon the cost of time and materials for KOA for the scope of services described herein. Invoices would be submitted monthly based upon project progress (percentage). Accounts are past due after 30 days. A finance charge of 1.5% per month after invoice date may be assessed on accounts more than 60 days past due. Conclusion Any questions about this proposal and scope of services may be directed to Benjamin Chan at (626) 226-9077. The proposal is valid for 90 days. Authorization If the proposal is acceptable to you, please sign this authorization proposal on the indicated line and return it with a copy of the signed proposal to our office. We have carefully reviewed the proposal dated lulu 9. 2013 by KOA Corporation. We do hereby authorize KOA Corporation to commence work as indicated within the terms and conditions of this proposal. Signature Print or Type Name & Title Address (if different than letter addressee) Date ƒ e ¥ � ) g 0 - \ 2(@0@ ase>e o . :< t!&!$) : ~��}\ 2\9§/ ( (\ } } E®: 2 0 _ \ \ \ \ ID ! [ I \ ) m _ ; > } { { & ( ) \ /f f - \ \ \ 0 k \ - _ n , ; 3 , } ;ro � � m/ CD \° \ \ / 77 \\ \ \\\\ \\w ƒ e ¥ � ) CITY COUNCIL Agenda it 7.1 (a) Meeting Date: Julv 16 2013 AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council VIA: James DeStefano, City Manager OR ) TITLE: RESOLUTION LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT ON CITY OF DIAMOND BAR LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 38 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2013-2014. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt. FINANCIAL SUMMARY: The District 38 levy rate of $15.00 per parcel will generate $268,245 in assessment revenue. The assessment rate remains the same as the rate applied at the date of Diamond Bar's incorporation. There are not sufficient funds collected to maintain and improve the District without utilizing the General Fund. For FY 2013-14, $14,902 of the General Fund will pay for the operation and maintenance costs in District 38. The assessment revenues shall be deposited in Special Revenue Landscape Fund 138 and shall apply toward the 2013-14 operation and maintenance budget. The total annual budget of the District is $283,147. The itemized budget for District 38 is included in the attached Engineer's Report, Financial Analysis, Page 4. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The landscaping improvements to be maintained by District 38 are the parkways along the northerly side of Grand Avenue (between Diamond Bar Boulevard and Summitridge Drive), the southerly side of Temple Avenue (between Diamond Bar Boulevard and Golden Springs Drive), along Golden Springs Drive (between Torito Lane and Temple Avenue); the streetscape improvements along Brea Canyon Road (between Pathfinder Road and the Southerly City Limit); and the medians throughout the City. The maintenance areas are further detailed in Exhibit "B-1" of the Engineer's Report. The maintenance and servicing of public landscaping improvements installed and constructed in public places in the City provides a special benefit which is received by each and every lot or parcel within the District, tending to enhance their value. The estimated number of parcels within the District is 17,883 parcels. The amount assessed upon the lands within District No. 38 for Fiscal Year 2012-2013 was $15.00 per parcel. This proposed assessment has been determined to be exempt from the provisions of Proposition 218 as set forth in Section 5(a): Any assessment imposed exclusively to finance the capital costs or maintenance and operation expenses for sidewalks, streets, sewers, water, flood control drainage systems or vector control. Date Prepared: July 8, 2013 PREPARED . David G. Liu Director of Public Works Attachments: Resolution No. 2013 -XX Engineer's Report dated July 8, 2013 RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -XX A RESOLUTION LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT ON CITY OF DIAMOND BAR LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 38 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2013-14. A. RECITALS. (i) By its Resolution No. 2013-16, this Council approved a report of the City Engineer related to City of Diamond Bar Assessment District No. 38 prepared pursuant to California Streets and Highways Code Section 22623, described the improvements thereon and gave notice of and fixed the time and place of the hearing on the question of assessment thereon for fiscal year 2013-14. A diagram of the area encompassed by said assessment district is attached hereto as Exhibit "A-1." (ii) Said hearing was duly and property noticed, commenced in the Windmill Room located at the Diamond Bar City Halt, 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California on July 16, 2013, and was concluded prior to the adoption of this Resolution. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. RESOLUTION. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar does hereby find, determine and order as follows: 1. The Recitals, as set forth in Part A of this Resolution, are in all respects true and correct. 2. This Council hereby expressly overrules any and all protests filed objecting to the proposed improvements specified herein or the assessment levied therefor. 3. Based upon its review of the report of the City Engineer referred to hereinabove, and other reports and information, the City Council hereby finds that (i) the land within the said District will be benefitted by the improvements specified in said 1 report, (ii) said District includes all of the lands so benefitted, and (iii) the net amount to be assessed upon the lands within said District for the 2013-14 fiscal year, in accordance with said report, is apportioned by a formula and method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements 4. The improvements specified in the report hereinabove referred to which is on file with the City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar are hereby ordered to be completed. 5. The assessment diagram contained in the report referred to hereinabove and the assessment of $15.00 for each assessable lot located within said District are hereby adopted and confirmed and said assessment hereby is levied for the 2013-14 fiscal year. 6. The assessment is in compliance with the provisions of the Act, and the City Council has complied with all laws pertaining to the levy of an annual assessment pursuant to the Act. The assessment is levied for the purpose of paying the costs and expenses of the improvements described in the report referred to hereinabove for fiscal year 2013-14. 7. The City Treasurer shall deposit all moneys representing assessments collected by the County to the credit of a special fund for use in City of Diamond Bar Assessment District No. 38. 8. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file the diagram and assessment with the County Auditor, together with a certified copy of this Resolution upon its adoption. 9. A certified copy of the assessment and diagram shall be filed in the office of the City Clerk and open for public inspection. 2 0 10. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. ADOPTED AND APPROVED this day of 12013. Jack Tanaka, Mayor I, TOMMYE A. CRIBBINS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, approved and adopted at the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the day of , 2013, by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: Tommye A. Cribbins, City Clerk City of Diamond Bar 3 ENGINEER'S REPORT Update of ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 38 Fiscal Year 2013-14 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR Final Report: July 8, 2013 Prepared by: GFB-FRIEDRICH & ASSOC., INC. 5225 Canyon Crest Drive, STE 71 PMB 315 Riverside, CA 92507 (951)781-0811 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION BOUNDARIES OF DISTRICT IMPROVEMENTS Landscaping FINANCIAL ANALYSIS Revenue Appropriations METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ROLL EXHIBITS Exhibit "A-1" - Assessment Diagram Exhibit "B-1" - Improvement Map Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 INTRODUCTION Pursuant to the order of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, this report is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. This report presents the engineering analysis for the 2013-14 Fiscal Year for the district known as: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 38 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR (Hereinafter referred to as "District"). This District, by special benefit assessments, provides funding for the maintenance of landscaped areas owned by the City of Diamond Bar which are located in public rights-of-way within the City of Diamond Bar. Section 22573, Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, requires assessments to be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. The section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000)) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." As the assessments are levied on the basis of benefit, they are considered a user's fee, not a tax, and, therefore, are not governed by Article XIIIA of the California Constitution. Properties owned by public agencies, such as a city, county, state or the federal government, are not assessable under pre -Prop 218 law. Assessment District No. 38 Engineer's Report — FY 2013-14 BOUNDARIES OF DISTRICT The boundary of the District is completely within the City limits of the City of Diamond Bar and is shown on the Assessment Diagram (on file in the office of the City Clerk at the City Hall of Diamond Bar as Exhibit "A -P). All parcels of real property included within the District are described in detail on maps on file in the Los Angeles County Assessor's office. Assessment District No. 38 Engineer's Report— FY 2013-14 IMPROVEMENTS The facilities and items of servicing and maintenance included within the District are as follows: Landscaping Servicing means the furnishing of water for the irrigation of any landscaping, the operation of any fountains, or the maintenance of any other improvements. Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of any improvement, including: Repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any landscape improvement. 2. Providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of landscaping, including without limitation, cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury. 3. The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste. Improvements to be serviced and maintained include, but are not limited to, median island and parkway landscaping on major streets and thoroughfares in the City of Diamond Bar. Exhibit "B -I," attached hereto, shows the location and extent of the landscaping improvements to be maintained by the proceeds from this assessment district. Assessment District No. 38 Engineer's Report— FY 2013-14 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS The estimated funding for maintenance and servicing of landscaping for the update of Assessment District No. 38 for the 2013-14 Fiscal Year is as follows: 2013-14 Recommended Budget Revenue: Appropriation Fund Balance (from FY 2012-13) $ 0 Property Tax — Special Assessments 268,245 Interest Revenue 0 Transfer in — General Fund 14,902 TOTAL $ 283,147 Annronriations: Personnel Services Salaries $ 0 City Paid Benefits 0 Retirement District Staffing is 0 Worker's Compensation Expense being subsidized by 0 Short/Long Term Disability General Fund 0 Medicare Expense 0 Cafeteria Benefits 0 Operating Expenses Advertising 5,000 Utilities 116,325 Maintenance of Grounds / Buildings 16,200 Professional Services 4,005 Contract Services Excel Landscape Maintenance 140,617 Gopher Control 1,000 Reserve for Future Capital Improvements 0 TOTAL Assessment District No. 38 Engineer's Report— FY 2013-14 M $ 283,147 Plans and Specifications Plans and specifications showing the general nature, location and extent of the proposed improvements are on file in the office of the City Clerk and available for public inspection. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT The net amount to be assessed upon lands within the District in accordance with this report is apportioned by a formula and method which fairly distributes the amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each lot or parcel from the improvements, namely the maintenance and servicing of public landscaping improvements within such District. The maintenance and servicing of public landscaping improvements installed and constructed in public places in the City of Diamond Bar provides a special benefit which is received by each and every lot or parcel within the District, tending to enhance their value. The primary benefits of landscaping are as set forth below: 1. Beautification of the streets which are used by all of the residents in Diamond Bar. 2. A sense of community pride resulting from well-maintained green spaces. 3. The enhancement of the value of property which results from the foregoing benefits. Existing land use information indicates that well over 90 percent of the parcels within the City of Diamond Bar are residences. Because the special benefits derived apply equally to all residents and parcels, it has been determined that all assessable parcels would receive the same net assessment. Assessment District No. 38 5 Engineer's Report — FY 2013-14 ASSESSMENT The amount to be assessed upon the lots and parcels within the District and the amount apportioned to each assessable parcel within the District is shown in the table below. Estimated Assessment Requirements: $268,245 Estimated Number of Parcels: 17,883 Estimated Assessment Per Parcel: $ 15.00 2013-14 Assessment Per Parcel: $ 15.00 2012-13 Assessment Per Parcel: $ 15.00 Difference: $ 0.00 Assessment District No. 38 Engineer's Report — FY 2013-14 ASSESSMENT ROLL The individual 2013-14 assessments, tabulated by Assessor's parcel number, are shown on an Assessment Roll on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar as Exhibit "C" and are made a part of this report by reference. (The Assessment Roll is not included in this report due to its volume.) Dated: 24 2013 GFB-FRIEDRICH & ASSOC., INC. 2� No. C2 861 Exp.3-31-14 * A. F D ICH CIVIL 0 Assessment District No. 38 Engineer's Report — FY 2013-14 EXHIBITS Assessment District No. 38 Engineer's Report — FY 2013-14 / Uz , \ \ !!\ « `: a CITY COUNCIL Agenda # 7, 1 (b) Meeting Date: July 16 2013 AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council VIA: James DeStefano, City Manager TITLE: RESOLUTION LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT ON CITY OF DIAMOND BAR LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 39 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2013-2014. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt. FINANCIAL SUMMARY: The District 39 levy rate of $130.00 per parcel will generate $162,630 in assessment revenue. The assessment rate remains the same as the rate applied at the date of Diamond Bar's incorporation. There are not sufficient funds collected to maintain and improve the District without utilizing the General Fund. For FY 2013-14, $84,052 of the General Fund will pay for the operation and maintenance costs in District 39. The assessment revenues shall be deposited in Special Revenue Landscape Fund 139 and shall apply toward the 2013-14 operation and maintenance budget. The total annual budget of the District is $246,682. The itemized budget for District 39 is included in the attached Engineer's Report, Financial Analysis, Page 4. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The landscaping improvements to be maintained by District 39 are the mini parks, slopes, and open space areas within the Assessment diagram as reflected in Exhibit "B- 2" of the Engineer's Report. This reflects a total maintenance area of 60.45 acres. The maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements installed and constructed provide a special benefit which is received by each and every lot or parcel within the District, tending to enhance their value. The estimated number of parcels within the District is 1,251 parcels. The amount assessed upon the lands within District No. 39 for Fiscal Year 2012-13 was $130.00 per parcel. This proposed assessment has been determined to be exempt from the provisions of Proposition 218 as set forth in Section 5(b): Any assessment imposed pursuant to a petition signed by the persons owning all of the parcels subject to the assessment at the time the assessment is initially imposed. Date Prepared: July 8, 2013 PREPARED David G. bu Director of Public Works Attachments: Resolution No. 2013 -XX Engineer's Report dated July 8, 2013 RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -XX A RESOLUTION LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT ON CITY OF DIAMOND BAR LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 39 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2013-14. A. RECITALS. (i) By its Resolution No. 2013-17, this Council approved a report of the City Engineer related to City of Diamond Bar Landscaping Assessment District No. 39 prepared pursuant to California Streets and Highways Code Section 22623, described the improvements thereon and gave notice of and fixed the time and place of the hearing on the question of assessment thereon for fiscal year 2013-14. A diagram of the area encompassed by said assessment district is attached hereto as Exhibit "A-2." (ii) Said hearing was duly and properly noticed, commenced in the Windmill Room located at the Diamond Bar City Hall, 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California on July 16, 2013, and was concluded prior to the adoption of this Resolution. (iii) Ali legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. RESOLUTION. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar does hereby find, determine and order as follows: 1. The Recitals, as set forth in Part A of this Resolution, are in all respects true and correct. 2. This Council hereby expressly overrules any and all protests filed objecting to the proposed improvements specified herein or the assessment levied therefor. 1 3. Based upon its review of the report of the City Engineer referred to hereinabove, and other reports and information, the City Council hereby finds that (i) the land within the said District will be benefitted by the improvements specified in said report, (ii) said District includes all of the lands so benefitted, and (iii) the net amount to be assessed upon the lands within said District for the 2013-14 fiscal year, in accordance with said report, is apportioned by a formula and method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements 4. The improvements specified in the report hereinabove referred to which is on file with the City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar are hereby ordered to be completed. 5. The assessment diagram contained in the report referred to hereinabove and the assessment of $130.00 for each assessable lot located within said District are hereby adopted and confirmed and said assessment hereby is levied for the 2013-14 fiscal year. 6. The assessment is in compliance with the provisions of the Act, and the City Council has complied with all laws pertaining to the levy of an annual assessment pursuant to the Act. The assessment is levied for the purpose of paying the costs and expenses of the improvements described in the report referred to hereinabove for fiscal year 2013-14. 7. The City Treasurer shall deposit all moneys representing assessments collected by the County to the credit of a special fund for use in City of Diamond Bar Assessment District No. 39. 8. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file the diagram and assessment with the County Auditor, together with a certified copy of this Resolution upon its adoption. 2 9. A certified copy of the assessment and diagram shall be filed in the office of the City Clerk and open for public inspection. 10. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. ADOPTED AND APPROVED this day of 12013. Jack Tanaka, Mayor I, TOMMYE A. CRIBBINS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, approved and adopted at the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the day of , 2013, by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: Tommye A. Cribbins, City Clerk City of Diamond Bar I EXHIBIT A-2" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM . ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0. 39 FISCAL YEAR 2013-2014 FOR THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEET LEGEND —INT, ee couxry OF �v unw5, nnrz op cpu11— Fl.— . IF zl u ss op aos uvcors FOO -ED es me11 � � C.4APHIC SCALE —O'Qw FOR—FIT 1' pwcu waps ox nLI ix iK o pit'c op N[ eos C£B—FRIEIIRICH k ASSOF, iNC. uvvrus couxm e f W %a•T 1 {ss�l aewa��. ei Rie°ay.e.i..n ENGINEER'S REPORT Update of ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 39 Fiscal Year 2013-14 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR Final Report: July 16, 2013 Prepared by: GFB-FRIEDRICH & ASSOC., INC. 5225 Canyon Crest Drive, STE 71 PMB 315 Riverside, CA 92507 (951)781-0811 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION BOUNDARIES OF DISTRICT IMPROVEMENTS Landscaping FINANCIAL ANALYSIS Revenue Appropriations METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ROLL EXHIBITS Exhibit "A-2" - Assessment Diagram Exhibit "B-2" - Improvement Map Page I 2 3 4 5 6 7 INTRODUCTION Pursuant to the order of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, this report is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. This report presents the engineering analysis for the 2013-14 Fiscal Year for the district known as: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 39 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR (Hereinafter referred to as "District") This District, by special benefit assessments, provides funding for the maintenance of landscaped areas owned by the City of Diamond Bar which are located in public rights-of-way within the City of Diamond Bar. Section 22573, Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, requires assessments to be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. The section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000)) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." As the assessments are levied on the basis of benefit, they are considered a user's fee, not a tax, and, therefore, are not governed by Article XIIIA of the California Constitution. Properties owned by public agencies, such as a city, county, state or the federal government, are not assessable under pre -Prop 218 law. Assessment District No. 39 1 Engineer's Report— FY 2013-14 BOUNDARIES OF DISTRICT The boundary of the District is shown on the Assessment Diagram (on file in the office of the City Clerk at the City Hall of Diamond Bar as Exhibit "A-21'). All parcels of real property included within the District are described in detail on maps on file in the Los Angeles County Assessor's office. Assessment District No. 39 2 Engineer's Report — FY 2013-14 IMPROVEMENTS The facilities and items of servicing and maintenance included within the District are as follows: Landscaping Servicing means the furnishing of water for the irrigation of any landscaping, the operation of any fountains, or the maintenance of any other improvements. Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of any improvement, including: 1. Repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any landscape improvement. 2. Providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of landscaping, including without limitation, cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury. 3. The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste. The propose of Assessment District No. 39 is for the maintenance and servicing of mini -parks, slopes and open spaces within the District. Exhibit '13-2," attached hereto, shows the location and extent of the landscaping improvements to be maintained by the proceeds from this assessment district. Assessment District No. 39 3 Engineer's Report— FY 2013-14 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS The estimated funding for maintenance and servicing of landscaping for the update of Assessment District No. 39 for the 2013-14 Fiscal Year is as follows: Revenue: Appropriation Fund Balance (front FY 2012-13) Property Tax and Assessments Interest Revenue Transfer In — General Fund TOTAL Appropriations: Personal Services Salaries City Paid Benefits Retirement Worker's Compensation Expense Short/Long Term Disability Medicare Expense Cafeteria Benefits Operating Expenses Advertising Utilities Maintenance -Grounds & Bldg. Professional Services Contract Services Excel Landscape Maintenance Weed/Pest Abatement (L.A. County Ag) Capital Outlays Miscellaneous Equipment Reserve for Future Capital Improvements TOTAL Assessment District No. 39 4 Engineer's Report — FY 2013-14 2013-14 Recommended Budget $ 0 162,630 0 84,052 $ 246,682 $ 0 0 District Staffing is 0 being subsidized by 0 General Fund 0 0 0 5,000 71,000 9,850 4,500 139,332 17,000 0 0 $ 246,682 Plans and Specifications Plans and specifications showing the general nature, location and extent of any proposed improvements are on file in the office of the City Clerk and available for public inspection. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT The net amount to be assessed upon lands within the District in accordance with this report is apportioned by a formula and method which fairly distributes the amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each lot or parcel from the improvements, namely the maintenance and servicing of public landscaping improvements within such District. The maintenance and servicing of public landscaping improvements installed and constructed in public places in the City of Diamond Bar provides a special benefit which is received by each and every lot or parcel within the District, tending to enhance their value. The primary benefits of landscaping are as set forth below: 1. Beautification of the streets which are used by all of the residents in Diamond Bar. 2. Public parks which can be utilized and enjoyed by all residents within the District 3. A sense of community pride resulting from well-maintained green spaces. 4. The enhancement of the value of property which results from the foregoing benefits. Existing land use information indicates that all of the parcels within the District are residences. Because the special benefits derived apply equally to all residents and parcels, it has been determined that all assessable parcels would receive the same net assessment. Assessment District No. 39 5 Engineer's Report— FY 2013-14 ASSESSMENT The amount to be assessed upon the lots and parcels within the District and the amount apportioned to each assessable parcel within the District is shown in the table below. Estimated Assessment Requirements: Estimated Number of Parcels: Estimated Assessment Per Parcel: 2013-14 Assessment Per Parcel: 2012-13 Assessment Per Parcel: Difference: Assessment District No. 39 6 Engineer's Report— FY 2013-14 $162,630 1,251 $ 130.00 $ 130.00 $ 130.00 $ 0.00 ASSESSMENT ROLL The individual 2013-14 assessments, tabulated by Assessor's parcel number, are shown on an Assessment Roll on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar as Exhibit "C" and are made a part of this report by reference. (The Assessment Roll is not included in this report due to its volume.) Dated: 2 2013 GFB-FRIEDRICH & ASSOC., INC. / 'r, "ii No.xp C2 l- 61 Exp.3-31-14 y A. F D ICH CIVIL,�r Assessment District No. 39 7 Engineer's Report— FY 2013-14 EXHIBITS Assessment District No. 39 Engineer's Report— FY 2013-14 EXHIBIT "A-2" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM . ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0. 39 FISCAL YEAR 2013-2014 FOR THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR CT G]iRPH1C SCALEHHE ru[m'Pwuurtc.cs[ssox ­Elu�a ou n TM[[a C .1 'HE [05 owsm)[ SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEET LEGEND iw . at wI— o[ uoR c Im w N[ of � GF5-FItIE➢RICK 2 a Stu.l `m. - in Ay uai.bwis EXHIBIT 'B-2" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. FISCAL YEAR 2013-2014 FOR THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR GR4PH16 6C.4LE' V e 1 w mouj ry 1 ✓l� SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEET 39 CjLEGEND_ mai eou mw. aeusx nn us¢ WIF Psvra >! s� un p55A wc. k O,C.. INC. s ssi� m -oma, qo-y eewioene ,�s CITY COUNCIL Agenda: # 7.1 (c) Meeting Date. July 16 2013 AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council VIA: James DeStefano, City Manager N) TITLE: RESOLUTION LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT ON CITY OF DIAMOND BAR LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 41 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2013-2014. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt. FINANCIAL SUMMARY: The requested District 41 levy rate of $220.50 per parcel will generate $122,157 in assessment revenue. The assessment rate remains the same as the rate applied at the date of incorporation of the City of Diamond Bar. There are not sufficient funds collected to maintain and improve the District without utilizing the General Fund. For FY 2013-14, $10,000 of Prop A Safe Parks Funds and $28,523 of General Funds will pay for the operation and maintenance costs in District 41. The assessment revenues shall be deposited in Special Revenue Landscape Fund 141 and shall apply toward the 2013-14 operation and maintenance budget. The District budget totals $160,680. The itemized budget for District 41 is included in the attached Engineer's Report, Financial Analysis, page 4. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The landscaping improvements to be maintained by District 41 are the slopes, and open space areas within the Assessment diagrams as reflected in Exhibit "B-3" of the Engineer's Report. This reflects a total maintenance area of 15.6 acres. The maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements installed and constructed provide a special benefit which is received by each and every lot or parcel within the District, tending to enhance their value. The estimated number of parcels within the District is 554 parcels. The amount assessed upon the lands within District No. 41 for Fiscal Year 2012-13 was $220.50 per parcel. This proposed assessment has been determined to be exempt from the provisions of Proposition 218 as set forth in Section 5(b): Any assessment imposed pursuant to a petition signed by the persons owning all of the parcels subject to the assessment at the time the assessment is initially imposed. Date Prepared: July 8, 2013 PREPARED BY: �"'I David G `Liu Director of Public Works Attachments: Resolution No. 2013 -XX Engineer's Report dated July 8, 2013 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -XX A RESOLUTION LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT ON CITY OF DIAMOND BAR LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 41 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2013-14. A. RECITALS. (i) By its Resolution No. 2013-18, this Council approved a report of the City Engineer related to City of Diamond Bar Landscaping Assessment District No. 41 prepared pursuant to California Streets and Highways Code Section 22623, described the improvements thereon and gave notice of and fixed the time and place of the hearing on the question of assessment thereon for fiscal year 2013-14. A diagram of the area encompassed by said assessment district is attached hereto as Exhibit "A-3." (ii) Said hearing was duly and properly noticed, commenced in the Windmill Room located at Diamond Bar City Hall, 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California on July 16, 2013, and was concluded prior to the adoption of this Resolution. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. RESOLUTION. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar does hereby find, determine and order as follows: 1. The Recitals, as set forth in Part A of this Resolution, are in all respects true and correct. 2. This Council hereby expressly overrules any and all protests filed objecting to the proposed improvements specified herein or the assessment levied therefor. l 3. Based upon its review of the report of the City Engineer referred to hereinabove, and other reports and information, the City Council hereby finds that (i) the land within the said District will be benefitted by the improvements specified in said report, (ii) said District includes all of the lands so benefitted, and (iii) the net amount to be assessed upon the lands within said District for the 2013-14 fiscal year, in accordance with said report, is apportioned by a formula and method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements 4. The improvements specified in the report hereinabove referred to which is on file with the City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar are hereby ordered to be completed. 5. The assessment diagram contained in the report referred to hereinabove and the assessment of $220.50 for each assessable lot located within said District are hereby adopted and confirmed and said assessment hereby is levied for the 2013-14 fiscal year. 6. The assessment is in compliance with the provisions of the Act, and the City Council has complied with all laws pertaining to the levy of an annual assessment pursuant to the Act. The assessment is levied for the purpose of paying the costs and expenses of the improvements described in the report referred to hereinabove for fiscal year 2013-14. 7. The City Treasurer shall deposit all moneys representing assessments collected by the County to the credit of a special fund for use in City of Diamond Bar Assessment District No. 41. 8. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file the diagram and assessment with the County Auditor, together with a certified copy of this Resolution upon its adoption. I 9. A certified copy of the assessment and diagram shall be filed in the office of the City Clerk and open for public inspection. 10. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. ADOPTED AND APPROVED this day of 12013. Jack Tanaka, Mayor I, TOMMYE A. CRIBBINS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, approved and adopted at the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the day of , 2013, by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: Tommye A. Cribbins, City Clerk City of Diamond Bar 3 EXHIBIT "A-3" - SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEET ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0, 41 FISCAL YEAR 2013-2014 FOR THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR GRAPHIC SCALE z �.p polrt �� L ASSOC. INC. � Nz [x nx[Ens eFH—FSRE^➢FICHne.,.n ENGINEER'S REPORT Update of ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 41 Fiscal Year 2013-14 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR Final Report: July 8, 2013 Prepared by: GFB-FRIEDRICH & ASSOC., INC. 5225 Canyon Crest Drive, STE 71 PMB 315 Riverside, CA 92507 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION BOUNDARIES OF DISTRICT IMPROVEMENTS Landscaping FINANCIAL ANALYSIS Revenue Appropriations METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ROLL EXHIBITS Exhibit "A-3" - Assessment Diagram Exhibit "B-3" - Improvement Map Page I 2 3 4 5 6 7 INTRODUCTION Pursuant to the order of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, this report is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. This report presents the engineering analysis for the 2013-14 Fiscal Year for the district known as: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 41 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR (Hereinafter referred to as "District"). This District, by special benefit assessments, provides funding for the maintenance of landscaped areas owned by the City of Diamond Bar which are located in public rights-of-way within the City of Diamond Bar. Section 22573, Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, requires assessments to be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. The section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000)) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." As the assessments are levied on the basis of benefit, they are considered a user's fee, not a tax, and, therefore, are not governed by Article XIIIA of the California Constitution. Properties owned by public agencies, such as a city, county, state or the federal government, are not assessable under pre -Prop 218 law. Assessment District No. 41 Engineers Report— FY 2013-14 BOUNDARIES OF DISTRICT The boundary of the District is shown on the Assessment Diagram (on file in the office of the City Cleric at the City Hall of Diamond Bar as Exhibit "A-3"). All parcels of real property included within the District are described in detail on maps on file in the Los Angeles County Assessor's office. Assessment District No. 41 2 Engineer's Report— FY 2013-14 IMPROVEMENTS The facilities and items of servicing and maintenance included within the District are as follows: Landscapin> Servicing means the furnishing of water for the irrigation of any landscaping, the operation of any fountains, or the maintenance of any other improvements. Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of any improvement, including: 1. Repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any landscape improvement. 2. Providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of landscaping, including without limitation, cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury. 3. The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste. The purpose of Assessment District No. 41 is for the maintenance and servicing of mini -parks, slopes and open spaces within the District. Exhibit "13-3," attached hereto, shows the location and extent of the landscaping improvements to be maintained by the proceeds from this assessment district. Assessment District No. 41 3 Engineer's Report — FY 2013-14 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS The estimated funding for maintenance and servicing of landscaping for the update of Assessment District No. 41 for the 2013-14 Fiscal Year is as follows: 2013-14 Recommended Bud¢et Revenue: Appropriation Fund Balance (from FY 2012-13) $ 0 Property Tax and Assessments 122,157 Interest Revenue 0 Transfer In— General Fund 28,523 Transfer In — Prop A 10,000 TOTAL $ 160,680 Appropriations: Personal Services Salaries $ 0 City Paid Benefits 0 Retirement District is being 0 Worker's Compensation Expense subsidized by 0 Short/Long Term Disability General Fund 0 Medicare Expense Staffing 0 Cafeteria Benefits 0 Operating Expenses Advertising 5,000 Utilities 36,250 Maintenance of Grounds / Buildings 17,000 Professional Services 4,500 Contract Services Excel Landscape Maintenance 49,730 Weed/Pest Abatement (L.A. County Ag.) 48,200 Capital Outlays Miscellaneous Equipment 0 Reserve for Future Capital Improvements 0 TOTAL $ 160,680 Assessment District No. 41 4 Engineer's Report— FY 2013-14 Plans and Specifications Plans and specifications showing the general nature, location and extent of the proposed improvements are on file in the office of the City Clerk and available for public inspection. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT The net amount to be assessed upon lands within the District in accordance with this report is apportioned by a formula and method which fairly distributes the amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each lot or parcel from the improvements, namely the maintenance and servicing of public landscaping improvements within such District. The maintenance and servicing of public landscaping improvements installed and constricted in public places in the City of Diamond Bar provides a special benefit which is received by each and every lot or parcel within the District, tending to enhance their value. The primary benefits of landscaping are as set forth below: 1. Beautification of the streets which are used by all of the residents in Diamond Bar. 2. Public parks which can be utilized and enjoyed by all residents within the District. 3. A sense of community pride resulting from well-maintained green spaces. 4. The enhancement of the value of property which results from the foregoing benefits. Existing land use information indicates that all of the parcels within the District are residences. Because the special benefits derived apply equally to all residents and parcels, it has been determined that all assessable parcels would receive the same net assessment. Assessment District No. 41 5 Engineer's Report— FY 2013-14 ASSESSMENT The amount to be assessed upon the lots and parcels within the District and the amount apportioned to each assessable parcel within the District is shown in the table below. Estimated Assessment Requirements: Estimated Number of Parcels: Estimated Assessment Per Parcel: 2013-14 Assessment Per Parcel: 2012-13 Assessment Per Parcel: Difference: Assessment District No. 41 6 Engineer's Report— FY 2013-14 $122,157 554 $ 220.50 $ 220.50 $ 220.50 $ 0.00 ASSESSMENT ROLL The individual 2013-14 assessments, tabulated by Assessor's parcel number, are shown on an Assessment Roll on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar as Exhibit "C" and are made a part of this report by reference. (The Assessment Roll is not included in this report due to its volume.) Dated: Z2 2013 GFB-FRIEDRICH & ASSOC., INC. J31-14 * A. F D ICH Assessment District No. 41 Engineer's Report— FY 2013-14 EXHIBITS EXHIBIT "A-3" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. FISCAL YEAR 2013-2014 FOR THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 41 SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEET GAGPHIC SCALE s en-_�ioo�n � �G£B�FAIEMDRILp h ASSOL. INC. s lvsp m�-een. go -1 ^mux..n EXHIBIT "B-3 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0. 41 FISCAL YEAR 2013-2014 FOR THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR D SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEET CRMH]C SCAti (nrsrl GFR�eRMDFICH k A660C., 1NC. nsEas fms.ln.mv mi-I+^m.w+.+ CITY COUNCIL Agenda #7.2 Meeting Date: July 16, 2013 AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council VIA: James DeStefano, City Manager TITLE: Tentative Parcel Map No. 72067, Development Review and Parking Permit (Planning Case No. PL2012-455) PROPERTY OWNER/ APPLICANT: Peichin Lee of Brea Canyon Investments, LLC, 17528 E. Rowland Street #200, City of Industry, CA 91748 PROJECT LOCATION: 650 Brea Canyon Road (Los Angeles County Assessor's Parcel Number 8719-010-901) RECOMMENDATION: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 2013 -XX approving the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation and Monitoring Program, and Tentative Tract Map No. 72067 to subdivide air space for an 11 -unit office condominium; and 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2013 -XX approving Development Review to allow the construction of a new two story professional office building, and Parking Permit to share driveway access and parking between the proposed development and the lot to the north of the project site for Planning Case No. PL2012-455. SUMMARY: The applicant is proposing to build a new two story professional office building on a vacant pad located at the northeast corner of Brea Canyon Road and Washington Street. This property was previously owned by the Alameda Corridor -East Construction Authority (ACE), and was disposed of as surplus property after the Brea Canyon Road underpass bridge construction at the railroad crossing in the cities of Industry and Diamond Bar. The following entitlements are being requested: 1. Tentative Tract Map No. 72067 to subdivide air space for an 11 -unit office condominium; 2. Development Review to construct a 21,794 square -foot, new two story professional office building on a 42,333 square -foot (0.97 acre) lot; and 3. Parking Permit to share driveway access and parking between the proposed development and the lot to the north of the project site. The building's architectural style is a contemporary modern style. The building is designed to incorporate principles of modern architecture by celebrating the capabilities of contemporary construction materials and technologies. BACKGROUND: Planninq Commission Review On June 25, 2013, the Planning Commission reviewed and unanimously recommended that the City Council approve the Tentative Tract Map, Development Review and Parking Permit. The Planning Commission staff report is attached (Attachment 3). During public testimony, Anthony Gonzales, a neighboring resident who resides in the multi -family townhomes to the south of the project site, expressed concern with the lack of available parking for the new development and the overflow parking it would create in his neighborhood. In addition, he was concerned with additional traffic that the development would create. During Commission deliberations, it was brought to the Commission's attention that one of the tenants (an ambulance company), in the existing industrial warehouse building located on the lot to the north of the proposed building site, was overutilizing the available parking. Based on photos submitted by Mr. Gonzales, the Commission noted that there were several ambulance vehicles parked in the parking lot. The applicant explained that she also owns the property to the north, and is aware that the ambulance company has outgrown its lease. The applicant further stated that the construction of the proposed office building is anticipated to be completed around the same time that the ambulance company's lease ends (December 2014), and that the lease will not be renewed. Therefore there would not be a parking issue. The Commission added a condition of approval requiring the applicant to submit a parking management plan to address the operational needs of the two buildings at full occupancy, subject to the review and approval by the City. ANALYSIS: Parking Demand Analysis One method to determine the parking demand is to review the City's development code parking requirements, which typically treats each use as a stand alone use at maximum demand. The proposed office and existing industrial warehouse buildings are in compliance with the City's Page 2 parking standards through a shared parking agreement. Both buildings require a total of 91 spaces, which are being provided. A second method is to conduct a field survey of the site and count the number of utilized spaces throughout the day to determine the current parking demand for all of the existing uses on-site. After the Planning Commission hearing, the applicant studied the parking demand of all existing tenants and observed that each tenant was utilizing two to four parking spaces, with the exception of the ambulance company that was utilizing 50 parking spaces for employee and company vehicles. On July 3, 2013, the applicant submitted a lease termination agreement with the ambulance company, included in Attachment 8. The lease will now terminate on August 30, 2013. A third method to determine parking demand is to conduct a shared parking analysis. The applicant prepared a parking study that analyzes the shared parking demand based on Urban Land Institute's shared parking methodology. The study concluded that the peak parking demand is the same 91 spaces as required pursuant to the City's Development Code. And per the Commissions' direction to address the operational needs of the two buildings at full occupancy, the following parking management plan is being proposed to ensure that parking is adequate for the new office building: 1. Owners and employees of the new office building will be encouraged to park on the lot to the north. Management will distribute notices to remind the businesses of this practice; 2. Lease for future tenants of the existing industrial warehouse building will incorporate language to limit the maximum number of vehicles allowed per code as well as restrict the number of commercial and company vehicles to 4 per unit. If a tenant violates these terms, the lease will be terminated; and 3. The applicant will add four new parking spaces on the lot to the north. Based on the parking requirements per the Development Code, field study, and shared parking analysis, it is estimated that at least 23 spaces would be available on the property to the north to accommodate staff parking from the new development. Therefore, based on the analysis above, it is unlikely that there will be parking congestion with the new development. With the proposed parking management plan restricting any future tenant that contemplates the use of more than four commercial vehicles for the purpose of conducting business at that premise, as well as encouraging owners and employees to park on the north lot, staff believes that the proposed parking is adequate to meet the demands of the existing and future uses. The applicant has made a good faith effort to ensure that parking issues do not arise by preparing a parking analysis and management plan with implementation measures to ensure adequate parking is available on site, as well as proposing to add four new spaces on the lot to the north. Staff is recommending to modify a condition (Recommended Condition of Approval #1 under Parking Permit in Attachment 2: Draft Resolution) to include the above described implementation measures in the reciprocal access and parking agreement as follows: Page 3 Prior to final map approval, a reciprocal access and parking agreement for the use and access of all common roads, driveways, parking, and easement area shall require the implementation of the recommendations as set forth in the parking management plan prepared by Linscott Law and Greenspan dated July 3, 2013, and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division, Public Works/Engineering Department and City Attorney and recorded with the Los Angeles County Recorder's Office, NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: Public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 500 -foot radius of the project site on July 5, 2013, and the notice was published in the Inland Valley Daily Tribune and San Gabriel Valley Tribune newspapers on July 5, 2013. The project site was posted with a notice display board, and a copy of the public notice was posted at the City's three designated community posting sites. Public Comments Received At the time the staff report was published, staff had not received any comments from the public. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: This project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on that assessment, staff prepared and filed an Initial Study/Environmental Checklist and Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project on May 23, 2013, with the Los Angeles County Clerk and published in the Inland Valley Daily Tribune and San Gabriel Valley Tribune newspapers, and it is part of this report (Attachment 4). Pursuant to CEQA Section 15105, the public review period for the Mitigated Negative Declaration began on May 31, 2013, and ended on June 20, 2013. Staff prepared the Initial Study/Environmental Checklist for the proposed project, which documents reasons to support the findings that the proposed project would not have any potentially significant impacts on the environment with the proposed mitigation measures included. The project is conditioned to include these mitigation measures as part of project approval (See Attachment A of Attachment 5: Mitigation and Monitoring Program). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached Resolutions (Attachments 1-2) to approve the following: Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation and Monitoring Program; Approve Tentative Tract Map No. 72067 to subdivide air space for an 11 -unit office condominium; and Page 4 3. Approve Development Review to allow the construction of a new two story professional office building, and Parking Permit to share driveway access and parking between the proposed development and the lot to the north of the project site for Planning Case No. PL2012-455. Prepared by: G S. L Senior Planner Reviewed David Doyle' Assistant City Attachments: Reviewed by: Greg Gubman, AICP Community Development Director 1. Draft Resolution No. 2013 -XX Approving Mitigated Negative Declaration and Tentative Tract Map 2. Draft Resolution No. 2013 -XX Approving Development Review and Parking Permit 3. Planning Commission Staff Report and Minutes dated June 25, 2013 4. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-16 5. Notice of Availability and Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration, Initial Study, and Mitigation Monitoring Program 6. Traffic Impact Analysis Report Dated June 25, 2013 7. Parking Analysis and Management Plan Dated July 3, 2013 8. Lease Termination Agreement Submitted July 3, 2013 9. Architectural, Conceptual Grading and Landscape Plans, Tentative Tract Map Page 5 AGENDA NO. 7.2 EXHIBIT 3 THROUGH 9 CAN BE REVIEWED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK, OR THE DIAMOND BAR LIBRARY LOCATED AT 21800 - 21810 COPLEY DRIVE DURING REGULAR BUSINESS HOURS. Attachment 1 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -XX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 72067 (PLANNING CASE NO. PL2012-455) TO SUBDIVIDE AIR SPACE FOR AN 11 -UNIT OFFICE CONDOMINIUM LOCATED AT 650 BREA CANYON ROAD, DIAMOND BAR, CA 91789 (ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 8719-010-901). A. RECITALS 1. Property owner, Peichin Lee of Brea Canyon Investments, LLC, filed an application for a Tentative Tract Map No. 72067 to subdivide air space for an 11 -unit office condominium located at 650 Brea Canyon Road, Diamond Bar, Los Angeles County, California ("Project Site"). 2. The Project Site is currently comprised of one parcel totaling 0.97 acres. It is located in the Professional Office (OP) zone and is consistent with the Light Industrial land use designation of the General Plan. 3. The legal description of the subject property is Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 16640. The Assessor's Parcel Number is 8719-010-901. 4. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, California Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq. ("CEQX) and CEQA's implementing guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15000 et seq., an initial study was prepared and it has been determined that the proposed project qualifies for a Mitigated Negative Declaration as the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment by properly conditioning the project ("mitigation measures") to make the project acceptable. In accordance to the provisions of Section 15070 of the CEQA Guidelines, the City prepared and filed a Notice of Availability and Intent to Adopt Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project on May 23, 2013, with the Los Angeles County Clerk. Pursuant to CEQA Section 15105, the public review period for the Negative Declaration began May 31, 2013, and ended June 20, 2013. 5. On June 25, 2013, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing, solicited testimony from all interested individuals, and concluded said hearing on that date. At that time, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the Project, subject to conditions. 6. On July 5, 2013, notification of the public hearing for this project was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers. Public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 500 -foot radius of the project site and public notices were posted at the City's designated community posting sites on July 1, 2013. In addition to the published and mailed notices, the project site was posted with a display board. 7. On July 16, 2013, the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing, solicited testimony from all interested individuals, and concluded said hearing on that date. 8. The documents and materials constituting the administrative record of the proceedings upon which the City's decision is based are located at the City of Diamond Bar, Community Development Department, Planning Division, 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765. B. RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: 1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. The City Council has independently considered the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration that was made available for public review, and all other oral and written public comments received prior to or at the public hearing prior to adopting this Resolution. The City Council finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the City's independent judgment and analysis. The City Council hereby determines on the basis of the whole record before it, including the Initial Study and comments received, that there is no substantial evidence that the proposed Project will have a significant effect on the environment, and on that basis, hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. The record of proceedings on which the City Council's decision is based is located at the City of Diamond Bar, 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California, Community Development Department/Planning Division. The custodian of record of proceedings is the Director of Community Development. 3. The City Council hereby specifically finds and determines that, having considered the record as a whole including the findings set forth below, there is no evidence before this City Council that the Proposed Project herein will have the potential of an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Based upon substantial evidence, this Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effects contained in Section 753.5(d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. C. FINDINGS OF FACT Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein and as prescribed under Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Section 21.20.080, this City Council hereby makes the following findings: Tentative Map Findings: Pursuant to Subdivision Code Section 21.20.080 of the City's Subdivision Ordinance, the City Council makes the following findings: 1. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the general plan and any applicable specific 2 TTM 72067 PL2012-455 plan: The proposed project involves the condominium subdivision of the site with 11 office units, and approximately 0. 72 acres of parking areas, driveway easements, and landscaping. The General Plan land use designation for the site is Light Industrial (1). The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan land use designation. The project site is not a part of any specific plan. 2. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development: The proposed condominium subdivision will be consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Light Industrial, which allows for the development of 11 office units in a 21,794 square -foot building. The building will have an approximately 52' setback from Brea Canyon Road and 20' from Washington Street and is located within an urbanized area adequately served by existing roadways and infrastructure. Therefore the property is physically able to accommodate the proposed development. 3. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or injure fish or wildlife or their habitat: The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or injure fish or wildlife or their habitat because the existing site is located in an urbanized area that does not contain habitats or would otherwise injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. 4. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements will not cause serious public health or safety problems: The proposed subdivision or type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health or safety problems because the existing site is located in an urbanized area and is consistent with other similar improvements in the area. 5. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision: A condition of approval is added to the project requiring a reciprocal parking and access agreement with the existing lot to the north of the project site for the use and access of all common roads, driveways, parking, and easement areas, prior to final map approval. 6. The discharge of sewage from the proposed subdivision into the community sewer system would not result in violation of existing requirements prescribed by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board: The project site shall be served by a separate sewer lateral which shall not cross any other lot lines. In the event that it is determined that each lot is not serviced by a separate independent sewer lateral, joint sewer maintenance and 3 TTM 72067 PL2012-455 sewer line easements which cross the lot lines shall be identified in the joint agreements between properties. Therefore, no further environmental review is required. The applicant shall construct the sewer system in accordance with the City Building and Safety Division and County Sanitation District Standards prior to building occupancy. 7. A preliminary soils report or geologic hazard report does not indicate adverse soil or geologic conditions: The existing pad was previously improved with buildings. Further grading will be constructed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the recommendations contained in the preliminary geotechnical investigation to assure that geotechnical stability is maintained or increased. 8. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable provisions of the City's subdivision ordinance, the development code, and the subdivision map act: The proposed subdivision is consistent with the City's subdivision ordinance, subdivision map act, and applicable development code. The proposed building complies with all required setbacks and development code regulations. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein and as prescribed under DBMC Section 21.20.080, this City Council hereby finds and adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration and approves the Tentative Tract Map, subject to the following conditions, and the attached Standard Conditions of Approval: A. GENERAL 1. The subdivision shall comply with the Conditions of Approval attached hereto and referenced herein. 2. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of Planning and Building & Safety Divisions, Public Works/Engineering Department, and the Los Angeles County Fire Department. 3. This approval shall not be effective for any purpose until the applicant/owner of the property involved has filed, within twenty-one (21) days of approval of this Tentative Tract Map No. 72067, at the City of Diamond Bar Community Development Department, an affidavit stating that the applicant/owner is aware of and agree to accept all the conditions of this approval. Further, this approval shall not be effective until the applicant pay the remaining City processing fees. 4. The applicant shall comply with Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.34.050. A permanent landscape maintenance program shall be implemented ensuring regular irrigation, fertilization, and weed removal. All landscaping shall be maintained in a healthy, neat and orderly condition, free of weeds and debris and with operating irrigation at all times. 4 TTM 72067 PL2012-455 B. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 1. The development shall comply with the specific requirements of Chapter 21.30 (Subdivision Design and Improvement Requirements) and Chapter 21.34 (Improvement Plans and Agreements) of the Subdivision Ordinance, as applicable. 2. The approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 72067 expires within three years from the date of approval if the recordation of the map has not been exercised as defined per Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Section 21.20.140. The applicant may request in writing for a time extension if submitted to the City no less than 30 days prior to the approval's expiration date, subject to DBMC Section 21.20.150 for City Council approval. 3. Prior to final map approval, the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's) that governs the 11 -unit condominium building shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Attorney. The City Council shall: (a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and (b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, to: Peichin Lee of Brea Canyon Investments, LLC, 17528 E. Rowland Street #200, City of Industry, CA 91748. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 16TH DAY OF JULY 2013, BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. 33 Jack Tanaka, Mayor I, Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 16th day of July 2013, by the following vote: AYES: Council Member: NOES: Council Member: ABSTAIN: Council Member: ABSENT: Council Member: 5 TTM 72067 PL2012-455 ATTEST` Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk City of Diamond Bar 0 TTM 72067 PL2012-455 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS USE PERMITS, COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL NEW AND REMODELED STRUCTURES PROJECT #: Development Review, Tentative Tract Map No. 72067 and Parking Permit Planning Case No. PL 2012-455 SUBJECT: A Develoament Review to construct a new 21.794 sauare- foot professional office building, Tentative Tract Map to subdivide air space for an 11 -unit office condominium, and Parking Permit to share driveway access and parking between the proposed development and the lot to the north of the prosect site. PROPERTY OWNER/ APPLICANT: Peichin Lee of Brea Canyon Investments, LLC, 17528 E. Rowland Street #200, City of Industry, CA 91748 LOCATION: 650 Brea Canyon Road, Diamond Bar, CA 91789 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION AT (909) 839-7030, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: GENERAL REQUIREMENTS In accordance with Government Code Section 66474.9(b) (1), the applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, and its officers, agents and employees, from any claim, action, or proceeding to attack, set-aside, void or annul the approval of Development Review, Tentative Tract Map and Parking Permit No. PL2012-455 brought within the time period provided by Government Code Section 66499.37. In the event the city and/or its officers, agents and employees are made a party of any such action: TTM 72067 PL2012-455 (a) Applicant shall provide a defense to the City defendants or at the City's option reimburse the City its costs of defense, including reasonable attorneys fees, incurred in defense of such claims. (b) Applicant shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against the City defendants. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action of proceeding, and shall cooperate fully in the defense thereof. 2. This approval shall not be effective for any purpose until the applicant and owner of the property involved have filed, within twenty-one (21) days of approval of this Development Review, Tentative Tract Map and Parking Permit No. PL 2012-455 at the City of Diamond Bar Community Development Department, their affidavit stating that they are aware of and agree to accept all the conditions of this approval. Further, this approval shall not be effective until the applicants pay remaining City processing fees, school fees and fees for the review of submitted reports. 3. All designers, architects, engineers, and contractors associated with this project shall obtain a Diamond Bar Business License, and zoning approval for those businesses located in Diamond Bar. 4. Signed copies of City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all partied involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency proper to issuance of City permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Revised plans incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval during plan check. 7. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval shall be completed. 8. The project site shall be maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of approval and all laws, or other applicable Federal, State, or City regulations. 9. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and any applicable Specific Plan in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 10. Property owner/applicant shall remove the public hearing notice board within three (3) days of this project's approval. 8 TTM 72067 PL2012-455 11. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of Planning and Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works/Engineering Department, and the Los Angeles County Fire Department. 12. These conditions of approval shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all future owners, operators, or successors thereto of the property. Non- compliance with any condition of approval or mitigation measure imposed as a condition of this approval, shall constitute a violation of the City's Development Code. Violations may be enforced in accordance with the provisions of the Development Code. 13. To ensure compliance with the provisions of the City Council design approval, a final inspection is required from the Planning Division when work for any phase of the project has been completed. The applicant shall inform the Planning Division and schedule an appointment for such an inspection. 14. Failure to comply with any of the conditions set forth herein or as subsequently amended in writing by the City, may result in failure to obtain a building final and/or a certificate of occupancy until full compliance is reached. The City's requirement for full compliance may require minor corrections and/or complete demolition of a non-compliance improvement, regardless of costs incurred where the project does not comply with design requirements and approvals that the applicant agreed to when permits were pulled to construct the project. I9:1*911]4I91;y1&1 1. Applicant shall pay development fees (including but not limited to Planning, Building and Safety Divisions, and Public Works Department and Mitigation Monitoring) at the established rates, prior to issuance of building permits, as required by the City. School fees as required shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permit. In addition, the applicant shall pay all remaining prorated City project review and processing fees prior to final map approval. 2. Prior to final map approval, all deposit accounts for the processing of this project shall have no deficits. C. TIME LIMITS 1. The approval of Development Review, Tentative Tract Map, and Parking Permit shall expire within three (3) years from the date of approval if the use has not been exercised as defined pursuant to Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 21.20.140 and 22.66.050(b)(1). In accordance with Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.60.050(c), the applicant may request, in writing, for a one-year time extension for City Council consideration. Such a request must be submitted to the Planning Division prior to the expiration date and be accompanied by the review fee in accordance with the Fee Schedule in effect at the time of submittal. 9 TTM 72067 PL2012-455 D. SITE DEVELOPMENT 1. The project site shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the approved plans submitted to, approved, and amended herein by the City Council, on file with the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 2. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, air conditioning condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berms, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Division. 3. All roof -mounted equipment shall be screened from public view. 4. All structures, including walls, trash enclosures, canopies, etc., shall be maintained in a structurally sound, safe manner with a clean, orderly appearance. All graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours by the property owners/occupant. 5. No occupancy permit can be granted, until all improvements required by this approval have been properly constructed, inspected, and approved. 6. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the location, size, and screening of all building utility service connections, including water, gas, and electric service, fire service, and irrigation connections shall be approved by the Community Development Director. All changes to building utility connections shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to construction. Building utility connections shall be located, sized and screened in such a manner that they have the least possible impact on the design of the building and site. The architect of record shall be directly involved in the design and placement of all site and building service connections and shall sign all plans submitted to the City which locate, size and/or screen utility connections. 7. Additional plant materials may be required by the Community Development Director and shall be planted prior to final occupancy in order to screen utility connections, valves, backflow devices, and all above ground appurtenances, etc., to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. This determination shall be made in the field after all screen utility connections, valves, backflow devices, and all above ground appurtenances, etc. have been installed and inspected. E. SOLID WASTE 1. The site shall be maintained in a condition, which is free of debris both during and after the construction, addition, or implementation of the entitlement approved herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether during or subsequent to construction shall be done only by the property owner, applicant or by a duly permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste from 10 TTM 72067 PL2012-455 residential, commercial, construction, and industrial areas within the City. It shall be the applicant's obligation to insure that the waste contractor used has obtained permits from the City of Diamond Bar to provide such services. 2. Mandatory solid waste disposal services shall be provided by the City franchised waste hauler to all parcels/lots or uses affected by approval of this project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, (909) 839-7040, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. In accordance with Government Code Section 66474.9(b) (1), the applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, and its officers, agents and employees, from any claim, action, or proceeding to attack, set-aside, void or annul, the approval of Tentative Tract 72067 brought within the time period provided by Government Code Section 66499.37. In the event the city and/or its officers, agents and employees are made a party of any such action: (a) Applicant shall provide a defense to the City defendants or at the City's option reimburse the City its costs of defense, including reasonable attorneys fees, incurred in defense of such claims. (b) Applicant shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against the City descendents. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action of proceeding, and shall cooperate fully in the defense thereof. B. SOLID WASTE 1. The site shall be maintained in a condition, which is free of debris both during and after the construction, addition, or implementation of the entitlement granted herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether during or subsequent to construction shall be done only by the property owner, applicant or by a duly permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste from residential, commercial, construction, and industrial areas within the City. It shall be the applicant's obligation to insure that the waste contractor utilized has obtained permits from the City of Diamond Bar to provide such services. 2. Mandatory solid waste disposal services shall be provided by the City franchised waste hauler to all parcels/lots or uses affected by approval of this project. 3. Trash receptacles are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Division review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 11 TTM 72067 PL2012-455 3. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-ups shall be for individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view. 4. Central trash enclosures shall be equipped with recycling receptacles. C. GENERAL 1. A title report/guarantee showing all fee owners, interest holders, and nature of interest shall be submitted for final map plan check. An updated title report/guarantee and subdivision guarantee shall be submitted ten (10) business days prior to final map approval. 2. A permit from the Los Angeles County Public Works Department shall be required for work within its right-of-way or connection to its facilities. 3. Prior to final map approval, written certification that all utility services and any other service related to the site shall be available to serve the proposed project and shall be submitted to the City. Such letters shall be issued by the district, utility and cable television company, within ninety (90) days prior to final map approval. 4. Prior to final map approval, applicant shall submit to the City Engineer the detail cost estimates for bonding purposes of all public improvements. 5. Prior to final map approval, if any public or private improvements required as part of this map have not been completed by applicant and accepted by the City, applicant shall enter into a subdivision agreement with the City and shall post the appropriate security. 6. Prior to final map approval all site grading, landscaping, irrigation, street, sewer and storm drain improvement plans shall be approved by the City Engineer, surety shall be posted, and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all public and private improvements. 7. Prior to issuance of grading permits, surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all drainage facilities necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 8. Easements for disposal of drainage water onto or over adjacent parcels shall be delineated and shown on the final map or addressed in the CC&R's, as approved by the City Engineer. 9. Prior to any work performed in the street right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Department in addition to any other permits required. 10. Applicant shall label and delineate on the final map any private drives or fire lanes to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 12 TTM 72067 PL2012-455 11. Easements, satisfactory to the City Engineer and the utility companies, for public utility and public services purposes shall be offered and shown on the final map. Permission shall be obtained from each utility company for any grading or construction over existing easements. 12. After the final map records, applicant shall submit to the Public Works/Engineering Department, at no cost to the City, a full size reproducible copy of the recorded map. Final approval of the public improvements shall not be given until the copy of the recorded map is received by the Public Works/Engineering Department. 13. Prior to occupancy, the applicant shall provide to the City as built mylars, stamped by appropriate individuals certifying the plan for all improvements at no cost to the City. 14. Applicant shall contribute funds to a separate engineering trust deposit against which charges can be made by the City or its representatives for services rendered. Charges shall be on an hourly basis and shall include any City administrative costs. 15. Applicant shall provide digitized information in a format defined by the City for all related plans, at no cost to the City. 16. All activities/improvements proposed for Tentative Tract 72067 shall be wholly contained within the boundaries of the map. Should any off-site activities/improvements be required, approval shall be obtained from the affected property owner and the City as required by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. 17. A lot line adjustment between Lot II and Lot I as shown on the proposed site plan shall be approved and fully executed prior to grading permit issuance. Additionally, conforming deeds shall be submitted to the Public Works/Engineering Department prior to issuance of grading permits. 18. Addresses for each unit shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public Works/Engineering Department prior to issuance occupancy. D. GRADING 1. No grading or any staging or construction shall be performed prior to final map approval by the City Council and map recordation or grading permit issuance, whichever comes first. All pertinent improvement plans shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval by the City Council. 2. Prior to beginning any grading activities, appropriate rodent barriers shall be installed around the perimeter of the project site to prevent the migration of 13 TTM 72067 PL2012-455 rodents to existing residential and commercial sites. A plan detailing the proposed rodent barriers to be used by the developer/contractor shall be submitted to the Public Works/Engineering Department for review. 3. Retaining wall location shall be shown on the grading plan and submitted with a soils report to the Public Works/Engineering Department for review and approval concurrently with the grading plan check. 4. Exterior grading and construction activities and the transportation of equipment and materials and operation of heavy grading equipment shall be limited to between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. Dust generated by grading and construction activities shall be reduced by watering the soil prior to and during the activities and in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 402 and Rule 403. Reclaimed water shall be utilized whenever possible. Additionally, all construction equipment shall be properly muffled to reduce noise levels. 5. All equipment staging areas shall be located on the project site. Staging area, including material stockpile and equipment storage area, shall be enclosed within a 6 foot -high chain link fence. All access points in the defense shall be locked whenever the construction site is not supervised. 6. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the California Building Code, City Grading Ordinance, Hillside Management Ordinance and acceptable grading practices. 7. At the time of submittal of the 40 -scale grading plan for plan check, a detailed soils and geology report shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval. Said report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer and/or geologist licensed by the State of California. 8. Prior to issuance of grading permits, storm drain improvement plans shall be approved by the City Engineer and surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all drainage facilities to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 9. Final grading plans shall be designed in compliance with the recommendations of the final detailed soils and engineering geology reports. All remedial earthwork specified in the final report shall be incorporated into the grading plans. Final grading plans shall be signed and stamped by a California Registered Civil Engineer, registered Geotechnical Engineer and registered Engineering Geologist and approved by the City Engineer. 10. A Standard Urban Stormwater Management Plan (SUSMP) conforming to City Ordinance is required to be incorporated into the grading plan and approved by the City Engineer. The applicant shall incorporate Structural or Treatment Control Best Management Practices for storm water runoff into the grading plans for construction and post -construction activities respectively. 14 TTM 72067 PL2012-455 11. All slopes shall be seeded per landscape plan and/or fuel modification plan with native grasses or planted with ground cover, shrubs, and trees for erosion control upon completion of grading or some other alternative method of erosion control shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and a permanent irrigation system shall be installed. 12. An erosion control plan shall be approved by the City Engineer. Erosion control plans shall be made in accordance to the City's NPDES requirements. 13. Submit a stockpile plan showing the proposed location for stockpile for grading export materials, and the route of transport. 14. A pre -construction meeting shall be held at the project site with the grading contractor, applicant, and city grading inspector at least 48 hours prior to commencing grading operations. 15. Rough grade certifications by project soils and civil engineers and the as graded geotechnical report shall be submitted for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits for the foundation of the residential structure. Retaining wall permits may be issued without a rough grade certificate. 16. Final grade certifications by project soils and civil engineers shall be submitted to the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of any project final inspections/certificate of occupancy respectively. E. DRAINAGE 1. All identified flood hazard locations within the tentative map boundaries which cannot be eliminated as approved by the City Engineer shall be shown on the final map and delineated as "Flood Hazard Area." 2. Storm drainage facilities shall be constructed within the street right-of-way or in easements satisfactory to the City Engineer and/or the Los Angeles County Flood Control Districts. 3. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a complete hydrology and hydraulic study shall be prepared by a Civil Engineer registered in the State of California to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 4. A comprehensive maintenance plan/program shall be incorporated into the CC&R's. F. STREET IMPROVEMENT 1. The applicant shall replace and record any centerline ties and monuments that are removed as part of this construction with the Los Angeles County Public Works Survey Division. 15 TTM 72067 PL2012-455 2. Prior to the issuance of any City permits, the applicant shall provide written permission to the satisfaction of the City from any property owners which will be affected by offsite grading. 3. All parking lot improvements shall be completed prior to issuance of any occupancy for the building. G. UTILITIES 1. Easements, satisfactory to the City Engineer and the utility companies, for public utility and public services purposes shall be offered and shown on the final map or addressed in the CC&R's. 2. Prior to final map approval, a water system with appurtenant facilities to serve all lots/parcels in the parcel division designed to the Walnut Valley Water District (WVWD) specifications shall be provided. . 3. Prior to final map approval, the applicant shall construct or enter into an improvement agreement with the City guaranteeing construction of the necessary improvements to the existing water system according to Walnut Valley Water District (WVWD) specifications to accommodate the total domestic and fire flows as may be required by the City Engineer, WVWD and Fire Department. 4. Prior to final map approval or issuance of building permit whichever comes first, written certification that all utility services and any other service related to the site shall be available to serve the proposed project and shall be submitted to the City. Such letters shall be issued by the district, utility and cable television company, if applicable, within ninety (90) days prior issuance of grading permits. 5. Prior to recordation of final map, applicant shall provide separate underground utility services to each parcel per Section 21.30 of Title 21 of the City Code, including water, gas, electric power, telephone and cable TV, in accordance with the respective utility company standards. Easements required by the utility companies shall be approved by the City Engineer. 6. Applicant shall relocate and underground any existing on-site utilities to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the respective utility owner. 7. Underground utilities shall not be constructed within the drip line of any mature tree except as approved by a registered arborist. H. SEWERS 1. Applicant, at applicant's sole cost and expense, shall construct the sewer system in accordance with the City Building & Safety Division and County Sanitation District Standards prior to occupancy. 16 TTM 72067 PL2012-455 2. Easements for the existing sewer line which crosses property lines shall be offered in the CC&R's. I. TRAFFIC MITIGATIONS 1. Access for full-sized (WB -40 or larger) trucks to the development shall be restricted/prohibited as identified in the LLG report dated March 26, 2013. The CC&R's shall include the restriction/prohibition. This prohibition shall be applied to all tenants of the existing building and proposed project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 839-7020, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Plans shall conform to current State and Local Building Code (i.e. Currently the 2010 California Building Code, California Plumbing Code, California Mechanical Code, and the California Electrical Code but the 2013 version will apply if plan check applied after January 1, 2014) requirements and all other applicable construction codes, ordinances and regulations in effect at the time of plan check submittal. 2. Provisions for Cal Green shall be implemented onto plans and certification provided by a third party as required by the Building Division. Specific water, waste, low VOC, and related conservation measures shall be shown on plans. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been met. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Every permit issued by the Building and Safety Division shall expire if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit or work has discontinued and not been signed -off on the job card by the building inspector. 5. Construction activities causing the operation of any tools or equipment used in construction, drilling, repair, alteration, or demolition work shall be conducted Mon. — Sat. between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. 6. The project shall be protected by a construction fence to the satisfaction of the Building Official. All fencing shall be view obstructing with opaque surfaces. 7. All structures and property shall be maintained in a safe and clean manner during construction. The property shall be free of debris, trash, and weeds. 8. All equipment staging areas shall be maintained in an orderly manner and screened behind a minimum 6' high fence. 9. Solid waste management of construction material shall incorporate recycling material collection per Diamond Bar Municipal Code 8.16 of Title 8. 17 TTM 72067 PL2012-455 10. The minimum design load for wind in this area is 85 M.P.H. exposures "C" and the site is within seismic zone D or E. The applicant shall submit drawings and calculations prepared by a California State licensed Architect/Engineer with wet stamp and signature. 11. This project shall comply with all Accessibility Code requirements including accessible parking, path of travel, elevators, restrooms, drinking fountains, etc. Provide compliance with van accessible parking, path of travel, etc. Reception counter shall comply with the Title 24 accessibility requirements. 12. Submit Public Works Department approved grading plans showing clearly all finish elevations, drainage, and retaining walls locations. 13. "Separate permit shall be required for all wall and monument signs, light poles, and retaining walls" and shall be noted on plans. 14. A height and setback survey may be required at completion of framing and foundations respectively. 15. Prior to Building permit issuance, all school district fees must be paid. Please obtain a form from the Building and Safety Division to take directly to the school district. 16. Provide exit analysis showing occupant load for each space, exit width, exit signs, etc. 17. Indicate the proposed addition and existing building on the plans. Submit code analysis and justification showing the following: a. Each building square foot b. Each building height C. Type of construction d. Sprinkler system e. Each group occupancy f. Property line location in relation to each building (side yard) g. Exit analysis for each building (occupant load/corridor rating/exit width/exit signs, etc.) h. Accessibility analysis for the entire site and for each building i. Shaft rating/ exterior walls construction/ opening protection 18. Guardrails shall be designed for 20 load applied laterally at the top of the rail. 19. Indicate all easements on the site plan. 20. All retaining walls shall be submitted to the Building & Safety and Public Work Departments for review and approval. 18 TTM 72067 PL2012-455 21. Submit grading plans showing clearly all finish elevations, drainage, and retaining wall locations. No building permits shall be issued prior to submitting a pad certification. 22. The project shall be protected by a construction fence and shall comply with the NPDES & BMP requirements (sand bags, etc.). 23. Check drainage patterns with Engineering Department. Surface water shall drain away from building at a 2% minimum slope. 24. Specify location of tempered glass as required by code. 25. Private property sewer system shall be approved by the Los Angeles County Sanitation District. 26. Special inspections and structural observation will be required in conformance to CBC 1704 to 1709. 27. A soils report is required and all recommendations of the soils report shall be adhered to. 28. The applicant shall contact Dig Alert and have underground utility locations marked by the utility companies prior to any excavation. Contact Dig Alert by dialing 811 or their website at www.digalert.org. 29. The location of property lines and building pad may require a survey. 30. AQMD notification is required at least 10 days prior to any demolition. 31. All workers on the job shall be covered by workman's compensation insurance under a licensed general contractor. 32. Any changes to approved plans during the course of construction shall be approved by the City prior to proceeding with any work. 33. All handrails for accessible features shall be continuous with no jogs or skewed areas. They must remain straight. 34. Landings for ramps in the public way shall be verified prior to permit issuance that they are level with at most 2% cross -slope. Any modification to the ramp shall obtain Public Works approval. 35. Number of plumbing fixtures shall be in compliance with CPC T-4-1. CBC Chapter 29 shall not be used for calculations for plumbing fixtures. 36. Slope setbacks consistent with California Building Code Figure 1805.3.1. Foundations shall provide a minimum distance to daylight. The Footings adjacent to Washington and Brea Canyon shall have the appropriate slope setback. 19 TTM 72067 PL2012-455 37. Fire Department approval is required. 38. The use shall not be for medical office. If used for medical office, a covered entry and additional accessible parking will be required. 39. The path of travel from accessible parking to the entry at the v -gutter shall be 2% slope in any direction and shall maintain drainage path to the satisfaction of Public Works and the Building Inspector. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT, (323) 890-4243, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. SUBDIVISION 1. Access shall comply with Section 503 of the Fire Code, which requires all weather access. All weather access may require paving. 2. Fire Department Access shall be extended to within 150 feet distance of any exterior portion of all structures. 3. Where driveways extend further than 150 feet and are of single access design, turnarounds suitable for fire protection equipment use shall be provided and shown on the final map. Turnarounds shall be designed, constructed and maintained to insure their integrity for Fire Department use. Where topography dictates, turnarounds shall be provided for driveways that extend over 150 feet in length. 4. Private driveways shall be indicated on the final map as 'Private Driveway and Firelane" with the widths clearly depicted and shall be maintained in accordance with the Fire Code. All required fire hydrants shall be installed, tested and accepted prior to construction. 5. Vehicular access must be provided and maintained serviceable throughout construction to all required fire hydrants. All require fire hydrants shall be installed, tested and accepted prior to construction. 6. Provide Fire Department or City approved street signs and building access number prior to occupancy. 7. The final map shall be submitted to our office for review and approval prior recordation. B. WATER SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS 1. Fire hydrant requirements are as follows: Install 1 public fire hydrant. 20 TTM 72067 PL2012-455 2. All hydrants shall measure 6"x 4"x 2%" brass or bronze, conforming to current AWWA standard C503 or approved equal. All on-site hydrants shall be installed a minimum of 25 feet from a structure or protected by a two (2) hour rated firewall. • Location: As per map on file with the office. • Other location: See attached map. 3. All required fire hydrants shall be installed, tested and accepted or bonded for prior to Final Map approval. Vehicular access shall be provided and maintained serviceable throughout construction. 4. Additional water system requirements will be required when this land is further subdivided and/or during the building permit process. 5. Fire hydrant improvement plans shall be submitted to our office prior to clearance of the Final Map. END 21 TTM 72067 PL2012-455 Attachment 2 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -XX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TO CONSTRUCT A 21,794 SQUARE -FOOT, NEW TWO STORY PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDING AND A PARKING PERMIT TO SHARE DRIVEWAY ACCESS AND PARKING BETWEEN THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND THE LOT TO THE NORTH OF THE PROJECT SITE (PLANNING CASE NO. PL2012-455) LOCATED AT 650 BREA CANYON ROAD, DIAMOND BAR, CA 91789 (ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO, 8719-010-901). A. RECITALS 1. Property owner, Peichin Lee of Brea Canyon Investments, LLC, filed an application for the following entitlements: (1) Development Review approval to construct a new 21,794 square -foot, two story professional office building; and (2) Parking Permit to share driveway access and parking between the proposed development and the lot to the north of the project site located at 650 Brea Canyon Road, Diamond Bar, Los Angeles County, California ("Project Site"). 2. The Project Site is currently comprised of one parcel totaling 0.97 acres. It is located in the Professional Office (OP) zone and is consistent with the Light Industrial land use designation of the General Plan. 3. The legal description of the subject property is Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 16640. The Assessor's Parcel Number is 8719-010-901. 4. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, California Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq. ("CEQA") and CEQA's implementing guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15000 et seq., an initial study was prepared and it has been determined that the proposed project qualifies for a Mitigated Negative Declaration as the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment by properly conditioning the project ("mitigation measures") to make the project acceptable. In accordance to the provisions of Section 15070 of the CEQA Guidelines, the City prepared and filed a Notice of Availability and Intent to Adopt Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project on May 23, 2013, with the Los Angeles County Clerk. Pursuant to CEQA Section 15105, the public review period for the Negative Declaration began May 31, 2013, and ended June 20, 2013. 5. On June 25, 2013, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing, solicited testimony from all interested individuals, and concluded said hearing on that date. At that time, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the Project, subject to conditions. 6. On July 5, 2013, notification of the public hearing for this project was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers. Public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 500 -foot radius of the project site and public notices were posted at the City's designated community posting sites on July 1, 2013. In addition to the published and mailed notices, the project site was posted with a display board. 7. On July 16, 2013, the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing, solicited testimony from all interested individuals, and concluded said hearing on that date. B. RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: 1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. The City Council has independently considered the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration that was made available for public review, and all other oral and written public comments received prior to or at the public hearing prior to adopting this Resolution. The City Council finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the City's independent judgment and analysis. The City Council hereby determines on the basis of the whole record before it, including the Initial Study and comments received, that there is no substantial evidence that the proposed Project will have a significant effect on the environment, and on that basis, hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. The record of proceedings on which the City Council's decision is based is located at the City of Diamond Bar, 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California, Community Development Department/Planning Division. The custodian of record of proceedings is the Director of Community Development. 3. The City Council hereby specifically finds and determines that, having considered the record as a whole including the findings set forth below, there is no evidence before this City Council that the Proposed Project herein will have the potential of an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Based upon substantial evidence, this City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effects contained in Section 753.5(d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. C. FINDINGS OF FACT Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein and as prescribed under Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Sections 22.48 and 22.30.050, this City Council hereby finds and recommends as follows: Development Review Findings (DBMC Section 22.48) 1. The design and layout of the proposed development are consistent with the general plan, development standards of the applicable district, design guidelines, and architectural criteria for special areas (e.g., theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards or planned developments): 2 DR/PP PL2012-455 The proposed office building is consistent with the applicable elements of the City's General Plan, City Design Guidelines and development standards by meeting all of the required setbacks. The proposed building has been designed in a contemporary modern style and incorporates principles of the modern architecture with its simplicity of building form and windows with nonsuperfluous details. In addition, the massing of the entrance/lobby area is taller than the other parts of the building and incorporates an alcove to the building entrance, bringing this element down to a human scale. The tall glazing openings have mullions to break up the big glass panels, and reveals are added on the elevations to break up the flat walls. The building is also consistent with the City's Commercial Design Guidelines Pages 8-13, which incorporates the following principles: ➢ Monotony of building design as well as busyness is avoided. Variation in wall place, roof line, detailing materials are used to prevent monotonous appearance in buildings; ➢ Parapet walls are treated as an integral part of the building design, ➢ The exterior building design, including roof style, color, materials, architectural form and detailing is consistent on all elevations of each building to achieve design harmony and continuity within itself; ➢ Articulation and accent color for identity and interest is provided for the building entrance; and ➢ Contains elements which transition to the human scale, particularly near the ground. The project site is not a part of any theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards or planned developments. 2. The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards: The proposed building will not interfere with the use or enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments because the use of the project site is designated for commercial uses and surrounded by commercial uses to the north, east and west. The proposed building will not interfere with vehicular or pedestrian movements, such as access or other functional requirements. A traffic analysis report concluded that the proposed project would not cause any intersections or street segments in the vicinity to operate an unacceptable level of service. All intersections and roadway segments will continue to maintain an acceptable level of service. In addition, the project site is prohibited from semi -trucks accessing the site due to the narrow width of the driveway. This prohibition would only allow smaller service/delivery trucks to access the site. The project 3 DR/PP PL2012-455 is conditioned to include this prohibition in the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions as well as the reciprocal parking and access agreement, subject to review and approval by the Planning Division, Public Works/Engineering Department and City Attorney. 3. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain and enhance the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by this chapter, the general plan, or any applicable specific plan: The architectural style is a contemporary modern style and is designed to be compatible with the character of the neighborhood and further enhances the visual quality of the neighborhood. There is no specific plan for the project area. 4. The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture and color, and will remain aesthetically appealing: The design of the new proposed building is a contemporary modern style of architecture. Variation in the building elements has been achieved through the utilization of varying architectural features such as higher parapet walls for the lobby entrance, tall storefront glazing at the rear corner of the building, reveals on the elevations, and different use of building colors and materials. The project has a sense of balance, involving well-proportioned masses and composition. The incorporation of an alcove for the entrance/lobby area brings the building to an intimately scaled, human level. 5. The proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious (e.g., negative effect on property values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity: Before the issuance of any City permits, the proposed project is required to comply with all conditions within the approved resolution, and the Building and Safety Division and Public Works Departments, and L.A. County Fire Department requirements. The referenced agencies through the permit and inspection process will ensure that the proposed project is not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. 6. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA): Staff prepared an initial study and determined that the proposed project qualifies for a Mitigated Negative Declaration as the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment by properly conditioning the project ("mitigation measures') to make the project acceptable. In accordance to the provisions of Section 15070 of the CEQA Guidelines, the City prepared and filed a Notice of Availability and Intent to Adopt Mitigated Negative Declaration 4 DR/PP PL2012-455 for the project on May 23, 2013, with the Los Angeles County Clerk. Pursuant to CEQA Section 15105, the public review period for the Negative Declaration began May 31, 2013, and ended June 20, 2013. Parking Permit Findings (DBMC Section 22.30.050) 1. The intent of the parking regulations, which is to ensure that sufficient parking will be provided to serve the use intended and potential future uses of the subject site, is preserved: The proposed professional office building is 21,794 square feet, and requires 60 parking spaces. The existing gross floor area of the one story industrial office/warehouse building to the north of the project site is 20,571 square feet, and requires 31 parking spaces. There are 37 spaces proposed to be provided on the project site and the lot to the north has 54 spaces. Therefore, there will be 91 spaces, and will comply with the requirement. 2. A parking permit is approved in compliance with Section 22.30.050 (Reduction of off-street parking requirements for shared uses): When reviewing parking impacts, the various uses and peak business hours for those uses are taken into consideration. The existing industrial office and warehouse building and the proposed office building have different uses which results in a range of peak business hours and parking demands. In addition, the proposed parking spaces as well as the existing parking supply to the north of the project site are adequate and can accommodate shared spaces. Due to this, staff does not foresee any parking issues resulting from the proposed use. In addition, the property to the north of the project site is not heavily congested or utilized. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein and as prescribed under DBMC Sections 22.48 and 22.30.050, this City Council hereby finds and adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration and approve the Development Review and Parking Permit, subject to the following conditions, and the attached Standard Conditions of Approval: A. GENERAL 1. The subdivision shall comply with the Conditions of Approval attached hereto and referenced herein. 2. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of Planning and Building & Safety Divisions, Public Works/Engineering Department, and the Los Angeles County Fire Department. 3. This approval shall not be effective for any purpose until the applicant/owner of the property involved has filed, within twenty-one (21) days of approval of this Development Review and Parking Permit No. PL2012-455, at the City of Diamond Bar Community Development Department, an affidavit stating that the applicant/owner is aware of and agree to accept all the conditions of this approval. Further, this approval 5 DR/PP PL2012-455 shall not be effective until the applicant pay the remaining City processing fees. 4. The applicant shall comply with Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.34.050. A permanent landscape maintenance program shall be implemented ensuring regular irrigation, fertilization, and weed removal. All landscaping shall be maintained in a healthy, neat and orderly condition, free of weeds and debris and with operating irrigation at all times. B. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 1. This approval is for the site plan, elevations, exterior materials, and conceptual landscape plans for a new 21,794 square -foot, two-story professional office building to be constructed at 650 Brea Canyon Road, as described in the staff report and depicted on the approved plans on file with the Planning Division, subject to the conditions in this Resolution. 2. The construction documents submitted for plan check shall be in substantial compliance with the architectural plans approved by the City Council, as modified pursuant to the conditions below. If the plan check submittal is not in substantial compliance with the approved Development Review submittal, the plans may require further staff review and re -notification of the surrounding property owners, which may delay the project and entail additional fees. 3. Within five (5) days following approval, the applicant shall submit a $2,156.24 Department of Fish and Game filing fee pursuant to Section 711.4(c) of the Fish and Game Code. 4. The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program outlined in the Mitigated Negative Declaration and approved by the City shall be implemented and complied with. 5. Prior to building permit issuance, landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for review and approval by the City's Consulting Landscape Architect and shall comply with the Water Conservation Landscaping Ordinance. 6. The final landscape plans shall show that the three Mexican pale verde trees are replaced with a non-invasive species, and additional groupings of a more transitional plant layout shall be added along Washington Street and the corner of Washington Street and Brea Canyon Road in order to blend into the existing landscape. These items will be verified during landscape plan check. 7. All existing landscaping and public improvements damaged during construction shall be repaired or replaced upon project completion. 6 DR/PP PL2012-455 8. Prior to plan check submittal, submit catalog cut sheets of the parking lot light poles for review and approval by the Planning Division. C. PARKING PERMIT 1. Prior to final map approval, a reciprocal access and parking agreement for the use and access of all common roads, driveways, parking, and easement areas shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division, Public Works/Engineering Department and City Attorney and recorded with the Los Angeles County Recorder's Office. The reciprocal access and parking agreement shall include provisions to implement the recommendations set forth in that certain Parking Analysis and Management Plan for Brea Canyon Business Center Project, dated July 3, 2013, prepared by Linscott, Law and Greenspan. The City Council shall: (a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and (b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution to Peichin Lee of Brea Canyon Investments, LLC, 17528 E. Rowland Street #200, City of Industry, CA 91748. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 16TH DAY OF JULY 2013, BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. M Jack Tanaka, Mayor I, Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 16th day of July 2013, by the following vote: AYES: Council Member: NOES: Council Member: ABSTAIN: Council Member: ABSENT: Council Member: ATTEST: Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk 7 DR/PP PL2012-455 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS USE PERMITS, COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL NEW AND REMODELED STRUCTURES PROJECT #: Development Review, Tentative Tract Map No. 72067 and Parking Permit Planning Case No. PL 2012-455 SUBJECT: A Development Review to construct a new 21,794 square - foot professional office building, Tentative Tract Map to subdivide air space for an 11 -unit office condominium, and Parking Permit to share driveway access and parking between the proposed development and the lot to the north of the proiect site. PROPERTY OWNER/ APPLICANT: Peichin Lee of Brea Canyon Investments, LLC, 17528 E. Rowland Street #200, City of Industry, CA 91748 LOCATION: 650 Brea Canyon Road, Diamond Bar, CA 91789 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION AT (909) 839-7030, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: GENERAL REQUIREMENTS In accordance with Government Code Section 66474.9(b) (1), the applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, and its officers, agents and employees, from any claim, action, or proceeding to attack, set-aside, void or annul the approval of Development Review, Tentative Tract Map and Parking Permit No. PL2012-455 brought within the time period provided by Government Code Section 66499.37. In the event the city and/or its officers, agents and employees are made a party of any such action: 8 OR/PP PL2012-455 (a) Applicant shall provide a defense to the City defendants or at the City's option reimburse the City its costs of defense, including reasonable attorneys fees, incurred in defense of such claims. (b) Applicant shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against the City defendants. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action of proceeding, and shall cooperate fully in the defense thereof. 2. This approval shall not be effective for any purpose until the applicant and owner of the property involved have filed, within twenty-one (21) days of approval of this Development Review, Tentative Tract Map and Parking Permit No. PL 2012-455 at the City of Diamond Bar Community Development Department, their affidavit stating that they are aware of and agree to accept all the conditions of this approval. Further, this approval shall not be effective until the applicants pay remaining City processing fees, school fees and fees for the review of submitted reports. 3. All designers, architects, engineers, and contractors associated with this project shall obtain a Diamond Bar Business License, and zoning approval for those businesses located in Diamond Bar. 4. Signed copies of City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all partied involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency proper to issuance of City permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Revised plans incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval during plan check. 7. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval shall be completed. 8. The project site shall be maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of approval and all laws, or other applicable Federal, State, or City regulations. 9. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and any applicable Specific Plan in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 10. Property owner/applicant shall remove the public hearing notice board within three (3) days of this project's approval. 9 DR/PP PL2012-455 11. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of Planning and Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works/Engineering Department, and the Los Angeles County Fire Department. 12. These conditions of approval shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all future owners, operators, or successors thereto of the property. Non- compliance with any condition of approval or mitigation measure imposed as a condition of this approval, shall constitute a violation of the City's Development Code. Violations may be enforced in accordance with the provisions of the Development Code. 13. To ensure compliance with the provisions of the City Council design approval, a final inspection is required from the Planning Division when work for any phase of the project has been completed. The applicant shall inform the Planning Division and schedule an appointment for such an inspection. 14. Failure to comply with any of the conditions set forth herein or as subsequently amended in writing by the City, may result in failure to obtain a building final and/or a certificate of occupancy until full compliance is reached. The City's requirement for full compliance may require minor corrections and/or complete demolition of a non-compliance improvement, regardless of costs incurred where the project does not comply with design requirements and approvals that the applicant agreed to when permits were pulled to construct the project. B. FEES/DEPOSITS 1. Applicant shall pay development fees (including but not limited to Planning, Building and Safety Divisions, and Public Works Department and Mitigation Monitoring) at the established rates, prior to issuance of building permits, as required by the City. School fees as required shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permit. In addition, the applicant shall pay all remaining prorated City project review and processing fees prior to final map approval. 2. Prior to final map approval, all deposit accounts for the processing of this project shall have no deficits. C. TIME LIMITS 1. The approval of Development Review, Tentative Tract Map, and Parking Permit shall expire within three (3) years from the date of approval if the use has not been exercised as defined pursuant to Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 21.20.140 and 22.66.050(b)(1). In accordance with Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.60.050(c), the applicant may request, in writing, for a one-year time extension for City Council consideration. Such a request must be submitted to the Planning Division prior to the expiration date and be accompanied by the review fee in accordance with the Fee Schedule in effect at the time of submittal. 10 DR/PP PL2012-455 D. SITE DEVELOPMENT 1. The project site shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the approved plans submitted to, approved, and amended herein by the City Council, on file with the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 2. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, air conditioning condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berms, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Division. 3. All roof -mounted equipment shall be screened from public view. 4. All structures, including walls, trash enclosures, canopies, etc., shall be maintained in a structurally sound, safe manner with a clean, orderly appearance. All graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours by the property owners/occupant. 5. No occupancy permit can be granted, until all improvements required by this approval have been properly constructed, inspected, and approved. 6. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the location, size, and screening of all building utility service connections, including water, gas, and electric service, fire service, and irrigation connections shall be approved by the Community Development Director. All changes to building utility connections shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to construction. Building utility connections shall be located, sized and screened in such a manner that they have the least possible impact on the design of the building and site. The architect of record shall be directly involved in the design and placement of all site and building service connections and shall sign all plans submitted to the City which locate, size and/or screen utility connections. 7. Additional plant materials may be required by the Community Development Director and shall be planted prior to final occupancy in order to screen utility connections, valves, backflow devices, and all above ground appurtenances, etc., to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. This determination shall be made in the field after all screen utility connections, valves, backflow devices, and all above ground appurtenances, etc. have been installed and inspected. E. SOLID WASTE 1. The site shall be maintained in a condition, which is free of debris both during and after the construction, addition, or implementation of the entitlement approved herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether during or subsequent to construction shall be done only by the property owner, applicant or by a duly permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste from 11 DR/PP PL2012-455 residential, commercial, construction, and industrial areas within the City. It shall be the applicant's obligation to insure that the waste contractor used has obtained permits from the City of Diamond Bar to provide such services. 2. Mandatory solid waste disposal services shall be provided by the City franchised waste hauler to all parcels/lots or uses affected by approval of this project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, (909) 839-7040, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. In accordance with Government Code Section 66474.9(b) (1), the applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, and its officers, agents and employees, from any claim, action, or proceeding to attack, set-aside, void or annul, the approval of Tentative Tract 72067 brought within the time period provided by Government Code Section 66499.37. In the event the city and/or its officers, agents and employees are made a party of any such action: (a) Applicant shall provide a defense to the City defendants or at the City's option reimburse the City its costs of defense, including reasonable attorneys fees, incurred in defense of such claims. (b) Applicant shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against the City descendents. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action of proceeding, and shall cooperate fully in the defense thereof. B. SOLID WASTE 1. The site shall be maintained in a condition, which is free of debris both during and after the construction, addition, or implementation of the entitlement granted herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether during or subsequent to construction shall be done only by the property owner, applicant or by a duly permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste from residential, commercial, construction, and industrial areas within the City. It shall be the applicant's obligation to insure that the waste contractor utilized has obtained permits from the City of Diamond Bar to provide such services. 2. Mandatory solid waste disposal services shall be provided by the City franchised waste hauler to all parcels/lots or uses affected by approval of this project. 3. Trash receptacles are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Division review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 12 DPJPP PL2012-455 3. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-ups shall be for individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view. 4. Central trash enclosures shall be equipped with recycling receptacles. C. GENERAL 1. A title report/guarantee showing all fee owners, interest holders, and nature of interest shall be submitted for final map plan check. An updated title report/guarantee and subdivision guarantee shall be submitted ten (10) business days prior to final map approval. 2. A permit from the Los Angeles County Public Works Department shall be required for work within its right-of-way or connection to its facilities. 3. Prior to final map approval, written certification that all utility services and any other service related to the site shall be available to serve the proposed project and shall be submitted to the City. Such letters shall be issued by the district, utility and cable television company, within ninety (90) days prior to final map approval. 4. Prior to final map approval, applicant shall submit to the City Engineer the detail cost estimates for bonding purposes of all public improvements. 5. Prior to final map approval, if any public or private improvements required as part of this map have not been completed by applicant and accepted by the City, applicant shall enter into a subdivision agreement with the City and shall post the appropriate security. 6. Prior to final map approval all site grading, landscaping, irrigation, street, sewer and storm drain improvement plans shall be approved by the City Engineer, surety shall be posted, and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all public and private improvements. 7. Prior to issuance of grading permits, surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all drainage facilities necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 8. Easements for disposal of drainage water onto or over adjacent parcels shall be delineated and shown on the final map or addressed in the CC&R's; as approved by the City Engineer. 9. Prior to any work performed in the street right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Department in addition to any other permits required. 10. Applicant shall label and delineate on the final map any private drives or fire lanes to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 13 DP/PP PL2012-455 11. Easements, satisfactory to the City Engineer and the utility companies, for public utility and public services purposes shall be offered and shown on the final map. Permission shall be obtained from each utility company for any grading or construction over existing easements. 12. After the final map records, applicant shall submit to the Public Works/Engineering Department, at no cost to the City, a full size reproducible copy of the recorded map. Final approval of the public improvements shall not be given until the copy of the recorded map is received by the Public Works/Engineering Department. 13. Prior to occupancy, the applicant shall provide to the City as built mylars, stamped by appropriate individuals certifying the plan for all improvements at no cost to the City. 14. Applicant shall contribute funds to a separate engineering trust deposit against which charges can be made by the City or its representatives for services rendered. Charges shall be on an hourly basis and shall include any City administrative costs. 15. Applicant shall provide digitized information in a format defined by the City for all related plans, at no cost to the City. 16. All activities/improvements proposed for Tentative Tract 72067 shall be wholly contained within the boundaries of the map. Should any off-site activities/improvements be required, approval shall be obtained from the affected property owner and the City as required by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. 17. A lot line adjustment between Lot II and Lot I as shown on the proposed site plan shall be approved and fully executed prior to grading permit issuance. Additionally, conforming deeds shall be submitted to the Public Works/Engineering Department prior to issuance of grading permits. 18. Addresses for each unit shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public Works/Engineering Department prior to issuance occupancy. D. GRADING 1. No grading or any staging or construction shall be performed prior to final map approval by the City Council and map recordation or grading permit issuance, whichever comes first. All pertinent improvement plans shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval by the City Council. 2. Prior to beginning any grading activities, appropriate rodent barriers shall be installed around the perimeter of the project site to prevent the migration of 14 DR/PP PL2012-455 rodents to existing residential and commercial sites. A plan detailing the proposed rodent barriers to be used by the developer/contractor shall be submitted to the Public Works/Engineering Department for review. 3. Retaining wall location shall be shown on the grading plan and submitted with a soils report to the Public Works/Engineering Department for review and approval concurrently with the grading plan check. 4. Exterior grading and construction activities and the transportation of equipment and materials and operation of heavy grading equipment shall be limited to between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. Dust generated by grading and construction activities shall be reduced by watering the soil prior to and during the activities and in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 402 and Rule 403. Reclaimed water shall be utilized whenever possible. Additionally, all construction equipment shall be properly muffled to reduce noise levels. 5. All equipment staging areas shall be located on the project site. Staging area, including material stockpile and equipment storage area, shall be enclosed within a 6 foot -high chain link fence. All access points in the defense shall be locked whenever the construction site is not supervised. 6. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the California Building Code, City Grading Ordinance, Hillside Management Ordinance and acceptable grading practices. 7. At the time of submittal of the 40 -scale grading plan for plan check, a detailed soils and geology report shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval. Said report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer and/or geologist licensed by the State of California. 8. Prior to issuance of grading permits, storm drain improvement plans shall be approved by the City Engineer and surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all drainage facilities to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 9. Final grading plans shall be designed in compliance with the recommendations of the final detailed soils and engineering geology reports. All remedial earthwork specified in the final report shall be incorporated into the grading plans. Final grading plans shall be signed and stamped by a California Registered Civil Engineer, registered Geotechnical Engineer and registered Engineering Geologist and approved by the City Engineer. 10. A Standard Urban Stormwater Management Plan (SUSMP) conforming to City Ordinance is required to be incorporated into the grading plan and approved by the City Engineer. The applicant shall incorporate Structural or Treatment Control Best Management Practices for storm water runoff into the grading plans for construction and post -construction activities respectively. 15 DR/PP PL2012-455 11. All slopes shall be seeded per landscape plan and/or fuel modification plan with native grasses or planted with ground cover, shrubs, and trees for erosion control upon completion of grading or some other alternative method of erosion control shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and a permanent irrigation system shall be installed. 12. An erosion control plan shall be approved by the City Engineer. -Erosion control plans shall be made in accordance to the City's NPDES requirements. 13. Submit a stockpile plan showing the proposed location for stockpile for grading export materials, and the route of transport. 14. A pre -construction meeting shall be held at the project site with the grading contractor, applicant, and city grading inspector at least 48 hours prior to commencing grading operations. 15. Rough grade certifications by project soils and civil engineers and the as - graded geotechnical report shall be submitted for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits for the foundation of the residential structure. Retaining wall permits may be issued without a rough grade certificate. 16. Final grade certifications by project soils and civil engineers shall be submitted to the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of any project final inspections/certificate of occupancy respectively. 1. All identified flood hazard locations within the tentative map boundaries which cannot be eliminated as approved by the City Engineer shall be shown on the final map and delineated as "Flood Hazard Area." 2. Storm drainage facilities shall be constructed within the street right-of-way or in easements satisfactory to the City Engineer and/or the Los Angeles County Flood Control Districts. 3. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a complete hydrology and hydraulic study shall be prepared by a Civil Engineer registered in the State of California to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 4. A comprehensive maintenance plan/program shall be incorporated into the CC&R's. F. STREET IMPROVEMENT 1. The applicant shall replace and record any centerline ties and monuments that are removed as part of this construction with the Los Angeles County Public Works Survey Division. 16 DR/PP PL2012-455 2. Prior to the issuance of any City permits, the applicant shall provide written permission to the satisfaction of the City from any property owners which will be affected by offsite grading. 3. All parking lot improvements shall be completed prior to issuance of any occupancy for the building. G. UTILITIES 1. Easements, satisfactory to the City Engineer and the utility companies, for public utility and public services purposes shall be offered and shown on the final map or addressed in the CC&R's. 2. Prior to final map approval, a water system with appurtenant facilities to serve all lots/parcels in the parcel division designed to the Walnut Valley Water District (WVWD) specifications shall be provided. . 3. Prior to final map approval, the applicant shall construct or enter into an improvement agreement with the City guaranteeing construction of the necessary improvements to the existing water system according to Walnut Valley Water District (WVWD) specifications to accommodate the total domestic and fire flows as may be required by the City Engineer, WVWD and Fire Department, 4. Prior to final map approval or issuance of building permit whichever comes first, written certification that all utility services and any other service related to the site shall be available to serve the proposed project and shall be submitted to the City. Such letters shall be issued by the district, utility and cable television company, if applicable, within ninety (90) days prior issuance of grading permits. 5. Prior to recordation of final map, applicant shall provide separate underground utility services to each parcel per Section 21.30 of Title 21 of the City Code, including water, gas, electric power, telephone and cable TV, in accordance with the respective utility company standards. Easements required by the utility companies shall be approved by the City Engineer. 6. Applicant shall relocate and underground any existing on-site utilities to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the respective utility owner. 7. Underground utilities shall not be constructed within the drip line of any mature tree except as approved by a registered arborist. H. SEWERS 1. Applicant, at applicant's sole cost and expense, shall construct the sewer system in accordance with the City Building & Safety Division and County Sanitation District Standards prior to occupancy. 17 DPJPP PL2012-455 2. Easements for the existing sewer line which crosses property lines shall be offered in the CC&R's. TRAFFIC MITIGATIONS 1. Access for full-sized (WB -40 or larger) trucks to the development shall be restricted/prohibited as identified in the LLG report dated March 26, 2013. The CC&R's shall include the restriction/prohibition. This prohibition shall be applied to all tenants of the existing building and proposed project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 839-7020, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Plans shall conform to current State and Local Building Code (i.e. Currently the 2010 California Building Code, California Plumbing Code, California Mechanical Code, and the California Electrical Code but the 2013 version will apply if plan check applied after January 1, 2014) requirements and all other applicable construction codes, ordinances and regulations in effect at the time of plan check submittal. 2. Provisions for Cal Green shall be implemented onto plans and certification provided by a third party as required by the Building Division. Specific water, waste, low VOC, and related conservation measures shall be shown on plans. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been met. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Every permit issued by the Building and Safety Division shall expire if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit or work has discontinued and not been signed -off on the job card by the building inspector. 5. Construction activities causing the operation of any tools or equipment used in construction, drilling, repair, alteration, or demolition work shall be conducted Mon. — Sat. between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. 6. The project shall be protected by a construction fence to the satisfaction of the Building Official. All fencing shall be view obstructing with opaque surfaces. 7. All structures and property shall be maintained in a safe and clean manner during construction. The property shall be free of debris, trash, and weeds. 8. All equipment staging areas shall be maintained in an orderly manner and screened behind a minimum 6' high fence. 9. Solid waste management of construction material shall incorporate recycling material collection per Diamond Bar Municipal Code 8.16 of Title 8. 18 DR/PP PL2012-455 10. The minimum design load for wind in this area is 85 M.P.H. exposures "C" and the site is within seismic zone D or E. The applicant shall submit drawings and calculations prepared by a California State licensed Architect/Engineer with wet stamp and signature. 11. This project shall comply with all Accessibility Code requirements including accessible parking, path of travel, elevators, restrooms, drinking fountains, etc. Provide compliance with van accessible parking, path of travel, etc. Reception counter shall comply with the Title 24 accessibility requirements. 12. Submit Public Works Department approved grading plans showing clearly all finish elevations, drainage, and retaining walls locations. 13. "Separate permit shall be required for all wall and monument signs, light poles, and retaining walls" and shall be noted on plans. 14. A height and setback survey may be required at completion of framing and foundations respectively. 15. Prior to Building permit issuance, all school district fees must be paid. Please obtain a form from the Building and Safety Division to take directly to the school district. 16. Provide exit analysis showing occupant load for each space, exit width, exit signs, etc. 17. Indicate the proposed addition and existing building on the plans. Submit code analysis and justification showing the following: a. Each building square foot b. Each building height C. Type of construction d. Sprinkler system e. Each group occupancy f. Property line location in relation to each building (side yard) g. Exit analysis for each building (occupant load/corridor rating/exit width/exit signs, etc.) h. Accessibility analysis for the entire site and for each building i. Shaft rating/ exterior walls construction/ opening protection 18. Guardrails shall be designed for 20 load applied laterally at the top of the rail. 19. Indicate all easements on the site plan. 20. All retaining walls shall be submitted to the Building & Safety and Public Work Departments for review and approval. 19 DR/PP PL2012-455 21. Submit grading plans showing clearly all finish elevations, drainage, and retaining wall locations. No building permits shall be issued prior to submitting a pad certification. 22. The project shall be protected by a construction fence and shall comply with the NPDES & BMP requirements (sand bags, etc.). 23. Check drainage patterns with Engineering Department. Surface water shall drain away from building at a 2% minimum slope. 24. Specify location of tempered glass as required by code. 25. Private property sewer system shall be approved by the Los Angeles County Sanitation District. 26. Special inspections and structural observation will be required in conformance to CBC 1704 to 1709. 27. A soils report is required and all recommendations of the soils report shall be adhered to. 28. The applicant shall contact Dig Alert and have underground utility locations marked by the utility companies prior to any excavation. Contact Dig Alert by dialing 811 or their website at www.digalert.org. 29. The location of property lines and building pad may require a survey. 30. AQMD notification is required at least 10 days prior to any demolition. 31. All workers on the job shall be covered by workman's compensation insurance under a licensed general contractor. 32. Any changes to approved plans during the course of construction shall be approved by the City prior to proceeding with any work. 33. All handrails for accessible features shall be continuous with no jogs or skewed areas. They must remain straight. 34. Landings for ramps in the public way shall be verified prior to permit issuance that they are level with at most 2% cross -slope. Any modification to the ramp shall obtain Public Works approval. 35. Number of plumbing fixtures shall be in compliance with CPC T-4-1. CBC Chapter 29 shall not be used for calculations for plumbing fixtures. 36. Slope setbacks consistent with California Building Code Figure 1805.3.1. Foundations shall provide a minimum distance to daylight. The Footings adjacent to Washington and Brea Canyon shall have the appropriate slope setback. 20 DR/PP PL2012-455 37. Fire Department approval is required. 38. The use shall not be for medical office. If used for medical office, a covered entry and additional accessible parking will be required. 39. The path of travel from accessible parking to the entry at the v -gutter shall be 2% slope in any direction and shall maintain drainage path to the satisfaction of Public Works and the Building Inspector. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT, (323) 890-4243, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. SUBDIVISION 1. Access shall comply with Section 503 of the Fire. Code, which requires all weather access. All weather access may require paving. 2. Fire Department Access shall be extended to within 150 feet distance of any exterior portion of all structures. 3. Where driveways extend further than 150 feet and are of single access design, turnarounds suitable for fire protection equipment use shall be provided and shown on the final map. Turnarounds shall be designed, constructed and maintained to insure their integrity for Fire Department use. Where topography dictates, turnarounds shall be provided for driveways that extend over 150 feet in length. 4. Private driveways shall be indicated on the final map as "Private Driveway and Firelane" with the widths clearly depicted and shall be maintained in accordance with the Fire Code. All required fire hydrants shall be installed, tested and accepted prior to construction. 5. Vehicular access must be provided and maintained serviceable throughout construction to all required fire hydrants. All require fire hydrants shall be installed, tested and accepted prior to construction. 6. Provide Fire Department or City approved street signs and building access number prior to occupancy. 7. The final map shall be submitted to our office for review and approval prior recordation. B. WATER SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS 1. Fire hydrant requirements are as follows: Install 1 public fire hydrant. 21 DR/PP PL2012-455 2. All hydrants shall measure 6"x 4"x 2'/2" brass or bronze, conforming to current AWWA standard C503 or approved equal. All on-site hydrants shall be installed a minimum of 25 feet from a structure or protected by a two (2) hour rated firewall. • Location: As per map on file with the office. • Other location: See attached map. 3. All required fire hydrants shall be installed, tested and accepted or bonded for prior to Final Map approval. Vehicular access shall be provided and maintained serviceable throughout construction. 4. Additional water system requirements will be required when this land is further subdivided and/or during the building permit process. 5. Fire hydrant improvement plans shall be submitted to our office prior to clearance of the Final Map. END 22 DR/PP PL2012-455 Attachment 3 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT CITY OF DIAMOND BAR - 21810 COPLEY DRIVE - DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 - TEL. (909) 839-7030 - FAX (909) 861-3117 AGENDA ITEM NO. 72 MEETING DATE: June 25, 2013 CASE/FILE NUMBER: Development Review, Tentative Tract Map No. 72067, and Parking Permit (Planning Case No. PL2012-455) PROJECT LOCATION: 650 Brea Canyon Road (Los Angeles County Assessor's Parcel No. 8719-010-901) PROPERTY OWNER/ Peichin Lee of Brea Canyon Investments, LLC APPLICANT: 17528 E. Rowland Street #200 City of Industry, CA 91748 Summary The applicant is proposing to build a new two story professional office building on a vacant pad located at the northeast corner of Brea Canyon Road and Washington Street. This property was previously owned by the Alameda Corridor -East Construction Authority (ACE), and was disposed of as surplus property after the Brea Canyon Road underpass bridge construction at the railroad crossing in the cities of Industry and Diamond Bar. The following entitlements are being requested: 1. Development Review to construct a 21,794 square -foot, new two story professional office building on a 42,333 square -foot (0.97 acre) lot; 2. Tentative Tract Map No. 72067 to subdivide air space for an 11 -unit office condominium; and 3. Parking Permit to share driveway access and parking between the proposed development and the lot to the north of the project site. The building's architectural style is a contemporary modern style. The building is designed to incorporate principles of modern architecture by celebrating the capabilities of contemporary construction materials and technologies. After evaluating the application and related submittals, staff has determined that the proposed project complies with the City's development standards and the Subdivision Map Act, and believes that tha Development Review, Tentative Tract Map, and Parking Permit findings set forth in the Development Code can be made in the affirmative. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission forward a recommendation to the City Council to approve the proposed Development Review, Tentative Tract Map and Parking Permit No. PL2012-455, based on the findings of fact, and subject to the conditions of approval contained in the attached Resolution. Background The project site is on a 0.97 -acre vacant parcel. It is on an elevated pad, approximately 13 feet higher than the centerline of Brea Canyon Road and Washington Street. The site was previously developed a 2,500 square -foot single family residence and garage. These structures were demolished around 2006, prior to the construction of the Brea Canyon Road Grade Separation project by ACE. The site was then used as a temporary access road to the Metrolink station. After completion of the grade separation project, the site was declared to be surplus property, and was then disposed of earlier this year when ACE sold it to the applicant. The project site is legally described as Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 16640, and the Assessor's Parcel Number (APN) is 8719-010-901. Project Description The applicant proposes to build a new two-story professional office building, with 11 units to be sold as office condominiums governed by an association. The unit sizes range from 1,268 to 2,108 square feet and two public restrooms are proposed on each floor. There will be 37 parking spaces provided on-site with additional parking spaces available on the existing lot to the north. The applicant is requesting a parking permit to share driveway access and parking between the proposed development and the existing lot to the north. Site and Surrounding General Plan Zoning and Land Uses Page 2 of 12 CD: Staff Reports PC/Brea Canyon Road 650 PC Staff Report 06-25-2013.docx Aerial Photo Project Site Page 3 of 12 CD: Staff Reports PClBrea Canyon Road 650 PC Staff Report 06-25-2013.docx Review Authority (Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Sections 22.48. 21.20.080 and 22.30.050) The proposed project requires three entitlement applications for review. The Tentative Tract Map for the subdivision of land requires City Council approval. The Development Review for the site plan and architectural components of the project and Parking Permit to share parking and driveway access require Planning Commission approval. DBMC Section 22.48.030 of the Development Code requires all applications to be processed simultaneously by the highest review authority. Therefore, the Planning Commission's role in this matter is to forward a recommendation to the City Council for the three entitlements described below: Development Review (DBMC Section 22.48) The purpose of Development Review (DR) is to establish consistency with the General Plan through the promotion of high aesthetic and functional standards to complement and add to the economic, physical, and social character of the City. The process ensures that new development and intensification of existing development yields a pleasant living environment, and attracts the interest of residents and visitors as the result of consistent exemplary design. ® Development Standards: The following table compares the proposed project with the City's development standards for commercial development in the OP zone: -nj.;nwl ie proposed project will provide adequate parking by means of a shared parking arrangement with the rcel to the north. The attached conditions of approval require a reciprocal parking and access agreement be recorded with the final map. See discussion beginning on Page 8. Page 4 of 12 CD: Staff Reports PC/Brea Canyon Road 650 PC Staff Report 06-25-2013.docx ® Site and Grading Configuration: The site is on an existing pad. Although the pad is leveled, the applicant is proposing to lower it by one foot, requiring some grading and excavation. An ADA accessible ramp is proposed within the along the eastscaped erly prodriveway, property boundary s proposed to be retained a d incorporated into the site plan. Architectural Features, Colors, and Material: The City's Design Guidelines have been established to encourage a better compatible building and site design that improves the vital quality of the surrounding area through aesthetically pleasing site planning, building design, and architecture. In addition, a primary objective is to promote compatibility with adjacent uses to minimize any potential negative impacts. The architectural style is a contemporary modern style. The building is designed to incorporate principles of the modern architecture by its simplicity of building form and windows with nonsuperfluous details. In addition, the massing of the entrance/lobby area is taller than the other parts of the building and incorporates an his element down to a human The alcove tall glaozing ope ings havecmullliongsn to scale. break p the big glass panels, and reveals are added on the elevations to break up the flat walls. The project incorporates the principles of the City's Commercial Design Guidelines as follows: ➢ Monotony of building design as well as busyness is avoided. Variation in wall place, roof line, detailing materials are used to prevent monotonous appearance in buildings; ➢ Parapet walls are treated as an integral part of the building design; ➢ The exterior building design, including roof style, color, materials, architectural form and detailing is consistent on all elevations of each building to achieve design harmony and continuity within itself; ➢ Articulation and accent color for identity and interest is provided for the building entrance; and ➢ Contains elements which transition to the human scale, particularly near the ground. The north and east elevations feature a whimsical, asymmetrical arrangement of circular windows. The seeming randomness of the window placements, together with the varied window diameters, give the illusion that the building has no structural framing, and celebrate how space frames can be used to span large areas with few interior supports. Page 5 of 12 C0: Staff Reports PC/Brea Canyon Road 650 PC Staff Report 06-25-2013.docx East (Front) Elevation — Facing Parking Lot West (Street Front) Elevation — Facing Brea Canyon Road South (Street Front) Elevation — Facing Washington Street Page 6 of 12 CP. Staff Reports PC/Brea Canyon Road 650 PC Staff Report 06-25-2013.docx North Elevation Landscaping: 'A conceptual landscape plan was submitted with the application. Existing landscaping along the slopes located along Brea Canyon Road and Washington Street will remain. The landscape will be enhanced by adding more trees, shrubs, and ground cover around the south and east sides of the property. Four 36 -inch box Brisbane Box and four 24 -inch box Camphor trees are proposed along Washington Street. In order to screen the proposed retaining walls around the accessible ramp and existing transformer, tall shrubs are being proposed. The three Mexican pale verde trees proposed adjacent to the driveway is recommended to be replaced with another non-invasive species. See Condition of Approval No. B.5 of the Draft Resolution (Attachment 1). All other plant types proposed are non-invasive plant species. The project is also required to comply with the new water -efficient landscape requirements, which will be verified during building plan check. Tentative Tract Map (Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 21.20.0801 Pursuant to DBMC Section 66424 of the Subdivision Map Act, a Tentative Tract Map is required for the creation of a condominium or other interest,development simultaneously with the construction of a new structure. There are 11 units proposed within the new two story office building, to be sold as condominiums and governed by an association. The two public restrooms on each floor as well as the lobby, hallways, and elevator will be part of the building's common areas. The property will have 37 parking spaces on-site to share with the lot to the north. The project is conditioned to submit Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's) that govern the 11 units within the building, and is subject to review and approval by the City Attorney prior to the issuance of building permits. Parking Permit (DBMC Section 22.30.050) Pursuant to DBMC Section 22.30.050 of the Development Code, where two or more commercial uses are developed as a professional center and those uses have distinct and differing peak parking usage periods, a reduction in the required number of parking Page 7 of 12 CD! Staff Reports PC/Brea Canyon Road 650 PC Staff Report 06-25-2013.docx spaces may be allowed through the approval of a parking permit, provided that the most remote space is located within 300 feet of the use it is intended to serve (as measured along the most direct pedestrian path). The amount of reduction may be up to the amount of spaces required for the least intensive of the two or more uses sharing the parking. Professional offices are required to provide 1 parking space for every 400 square feet of gross floor area, medical offices are required to provide 1 space for every 250 square feet, and warehouse and storage facilities are required to provide 1 space for every 1,000 square feet. The existing gross floor area of the one story industrial office/warehouse building to the north is 20,571 square feet, and requires 31 parking spaces. The proposed development is required to provide 60 parking spaces. There are 37 spaces proposed to be provided on-site and the lot to the north has 54 spaces. Therefore the proposed development will comply with the parking code requirement by providing 91 spaces for both lots with a reciprocal parking agreement between the two lots. Parking Requirement The applicant submitted a draft reciprocal parking and access agreement governing the use and access of all common roads, driveways, parking, and easement areas. The agreement also prohibits semi -trucks from accessing the site due to the narrow width of the driveway. This prohibition would only allow smaller service/delivery trucks to access the site. The agreement will be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division and City Attorney's Office prior to final map approval. See Condition of Approval No. D.2 of the Draft Resolution (Attachment 1). Based on the traffic analysis report, the intersection capacity analysis for the intersection of Brea Canyon Road at Currier Road, Washington Street, Lycoming Street, SR -60 West Bound ramp intersections, and Golden Springs Drive at SR -East Bound ramps indicates that the proposed project will not have a significant traffic impact and is forecast to operate at Level of Service (LOS) D or better during peak hours. LOS D is the minimum level generally considered to be acceptable for urban intersections. The Page 8 of 12 CD: Staff Reports PC/Brea Canyon Road 650 PC Staff Report 06-25-2013.docx City of Diamond Bar's General Plan calls for LOS D as the minimum acceptable service level at an intersection, while LOS C is the minimum for roadway segments. The proposed project would not cause any intersections or street segments in the vicinity to operate at an unacceptable level of service. All intersections and roadway segments will continue to maintain an acceptable level of service. Therefore, no mitigation measures or improvements are required for the proposed project. Compatibility with Neighborhood The proposed project complies with the goals and objectives as set forth in the adopted General Plan in terms of land use. The project will not negatively affect the existing surrounding land uses, and the design and appearance of the proposed office building is compatible with the surrounding community. There is an office industrial park to the west, industrial office and warehouse building to the north, and a public storage facility to the east. Therefore, operational characteristics are compatible with the surrounding uses. There are multi -family homes to the south built on a much higher pad than the proposed development. In addition, Washington Street separates the multi -family homes from the proposed development. Multi -Family Homes to the South (View From Brea Canyon Road) Additional Review The Public Works/Engineering Department and Building and Safety Division reviewed this project and included their comments in the attached resolution as conditions of approval. Page 9 of 12 CD: Staff Reports MBrea Canyon Road 650 PC Staff Report 06-25-2013 docx Public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 500 -foot radius of the project site on June 13, 2013, and the notice was published in the Inland Valley Daily Tribune and San Gabriel Valley Tribune newspapers on June 14, 2013. The project site was posted with a notice display board, and a copy of the public notice was posted at the City's three designated community posting sites. Public comments Received At the time the staff report was published, staff had not received any comments from the public. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: This project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on that assessment, staff prepared and filed an Initial Study/Environmental Checklist and Notice of Intent to Adopt Negative Declaration for the project on May 23, 2013, with the Los Angeles County Clerk and published in the Inland Valley Daily Tribune and San Gabriel Valley Tribune newspapers, and it is part of this report (Attachment 2). Pursuant to CEQA Section 15105, the public review period for the Mitigated Negative Declaration began on May 31, 2013, and ended on June 20, 2013. The Initial Study is a preliminary analysis to determine whether or not a Negative Declaration, Mitigated Negative Declaration, or Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is needed for a project. If the Initial Study concludes that the proposed project will not significantly affect the environment, a Negative Declaration may be prepared. If there are potential impacts from the proposed project that can be mitigated to a level of less than significant, a Mitigated Negative Declaration may be prepared. A Mitigated Negative Declaration is a written document that briefly describes the reasons that a proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment by properly conditioning the project ("mitigation measures") to make the project acceptable. It is used to guide and assist the City staff, Planning Commission, City Council, and the public in the consideration and evaluation of potential environmental impacts that may result from the proposed project. Once the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration are prepared, a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration is posted at the Los Angeles County Clerk and published in the Inland Valley Daily Tribune and San Gabriel Valley Tribune newspapers. The public review period must be no less than 20 days. Staff prepared the Initial Study/Environmental Checklist for the proposed project, which documents reasons to support the findings that the proposed project would not have any potentially significant impacts on the environment with the proposed mitigation Page 10 of 12 M Staff Reports PC/Brea Canyon Road 650 PC Staff Report 06-25-2013.docx measures included. The project is conditioned to include these mitigation measures as part of project approval. See Attachment A of Attachment 2: Mitigation and Monitoring Program. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution (Attachment 1) recommending approval of the Development Review, Tentative Tract Map, and Parking Permit for Project No. PL2012-455 to the City Council, to allow the construction of a new two story professional office building, based on the findings of DBMC Sections 22.48, 21.20.080 and 22.30.050, subject to conditions of approval as listed within the draft resolution. Prepared by: GAac. Lee Senior Planner Attachments: Reviewed by: Greg Gubman, AICP Community Development Director 1. Draft PC Resolution No. 2013 -XX and Standard Conditions of Approval 2. Notice of Availability and Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration, Initial Study, and Mitigation Monitoring Program 3. Traffic Impact Analysis Report Dated March 26, 2013 4. Architectural, Conceptual Grading and Landscape Plans, Tentative Tract Map Page 11 of 12 CD: Staff Reports PC/Brea Canyon Road 650 PC Staff Report 06-25-2013.docx MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 25, 2013 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Nelson called the meeting to order at 7:08 p.m. in the City Hall Windmill Room, 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Vice Chairman Torng led the Pled&of Allegiance. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Frank Farago, JimmY1,Lin, Vice Chairmar Tony Torng, Chairm Absent: Commissioner Jack Also present: Greg Gubman, Co"i Eggart, Assistant City Attorney; Grace Lee, S Planner; John Douglas, EIR"Consultant; Coordinator. Is 2. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCbPUBL'IC.'C 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: As pFsentec 4. CONSENT CALENDAR: Shah was excused. t"Development Director; James anner; Natalie Tobon, Assistant itella Marquez, Administrative 4.1 Minutes of lfie'Requ'lbrMjeetinq of May 28, 2013. Call vote: None 3go seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Regular 3, as presented. Motion carried by the following Roll CMM18SIONERS: Farago, Lin, VC/Torng, Chair/Nelson COMMISSIONERS: None OMMISSIONERS: Shah ABS��N.T, ,rC 5. OLD BUSINESS: None 6. NEW BUSINESS: None 7. PUBLIC HEARING(S): 7.1 Development Review No. PL2013-123 — Under the authority of Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.48, the applicant and property owner, Razgo Lee, requested Development Review approval to construct a 1,023 square foot JUNE 25, 2013 PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION 7.2 second story addition to an existing single family residence on a 0.67 gross acre (29,138 square foot) lot. The subject property is zoned Low Density Residential (RL) with a consistent underlying General Plan land use designation of Low Density Residential. PROJECT ADDRESS: 24069 Gold Rush Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 PROPERTY OWNER: Razgo Lee APPLICANT: 24069 Gold Rush Drive Diamond Bar, CA -94765 AP/Tobon presented staff's report andz,redommended Planning Commission approval of Development Review No:PL2013-123, based ort°the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the°resolution. VC/Torng said the neighbor's letter referred to City of Glendora's code which calls for a 33 percent roof per 10,000 squara fleet of land and asked if Diamond Bar had such a code. AP/Tobon responded that the City's Development Standards state that within this ,zone there is a lot maximum coverage of 40 percent footprint and the proposed project is 24.4 percent coverage. Chair/Nelson opened the Chair/Nelson close"d,the public hearing VC/Tornd :moved, ` /Farago seconded, to approve Development Review No. PL2013 1 ?3., based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of annroval as listed withiri `the resolution. Motion carried by the following Roll Call AYES:QMMISSbNERS: Farago, Lin, VC/Torng, Chair/Nelson NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Shah No. PL2012-455 — The applicant requested Development Review approval to construct a 21,794 square foot new two-story professional office building on a 42,333 square foot (0.97 acre) Office Professional (OP) zoned parcel with an underlying General Plan land use designation of Light Industrial. A Tentative Tract Map was requested to subdivide air space for an 11 unit office condominium, as well as, a Parking Permit to share driveway access and parking between the proposed development and lot to the north of the project site. JUNE 25, 2013 PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION PROJECT ADDRESS: PROPERTY OWNER: APPLICANT: 650 Brea Canyon Road Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Peichin Lee 17528 E. Rowland Street #200 City of Industry, CA 91748 Brea Canyon Invesi 17528 E. Rowland i City of Industry, CA SP/Lee presented staff's report and recommend City Council approval Development Review and Parking,, Findings of Fact, and subject to the resolution. C/Lin asked how many leasable spaces building and whether the current users requ Chair/Nelson opened the M ed theF?lanning Commission iveTract;,°=,Map No. 72067, PL2012-466; _,based on the f approval as listed: within the within the existing industrial iveries from semi -trucks. Peichin Lee responded to C/Lin that the= existing industrial building is divided into 10 small units; with unit si2es from 860 =to 2800 square feet. They are relatively ;small units and the users are storing compact merchandise, and without'prmission to' have the semi -truck able to deliver their merchandise it is acceptatile,to,the small users since Choy are not the types of uses that would be served by semi -trucks - Chat/Nelson asked' how the Diamond Star development turned out for the applicanfi2nd.Ms. Lee responded that it was a great success. The location, quality and design are good and she thanked the Commission for approving the ,project. Sixty percent& the units were sold before they broke ground and the fest of the spaces were sold prior to completion. All of the users are happy with the^facility. Obviously, the demand for these types of units is strong for local business owners because they like to own their own units (pride of ownership) and takeadvantage of the low interest rates. Chair/Nelson asked i s. Lee expected ;ttie same kinds or types of Industry's users to come into this project and Ms Lee responded that as a matter of fact, 45 percent of the space is already reserved by professional users. Most of the users are from the City of Diamond Bar or adjacent neighborhoods. Chair/Nelson asked for examples of users and their types of businesses. Ms. Lee responded that there is a wholesale travel agency, a trading company, and a chiropractor who is currently leasing and wish to own. JUNE 25, 2013 PAGE 4 PLANNING COMMISSION Anthony Gonzales said he owns property in the 852 block of the adjacent townhomes directly across from the proposed project. The building looks great but he is concerned about the parking. He believes at this time they have 10 rentals. He visited the site on Monday and counted about 90 parking spaces and with the 10 rentals 71 parking spaces were filled in the middle of the afternoon on a Monday. He is concerned about overflow parking. If 10 units fill 71 spaces and Ms. Lee intends to add 11 more rental spaces, where will the additional parking come from. He understands that the bulk of parking is supposed to be shared with the northerly parking .bbt the northerly parking is already being occupied. He provided the C16i4iission with photographs. Chair/Nelson said the Commission would review the` phptographs and present them to the clerk, to be entered into the record °= During past years, the residents of Windwood Townhomes have had issues v7ith'parking overflow from Metrolink which the new multi -tiered structure�Pwill alleviate. However, he remains concerned that the overflow parking "from the project will flow into his complex. In addition, he is concerned that` professional offices will bring come and go traffic and the area is already congested and,difficultto maneuver.. C/Lin said that in looking at the photographs 'he;noticed an ambulance company that has six or seven ambulance vehicles parked. there. Mr. Gonzales said there is a lot of emergency vehicle traffic that goes 1h.'and out of the parking lot and each of those vehicles carry one to twp individuals so that would mean two to three spaces occupied by employees and the''company. The company has been at that,location for a number`of years. Aside from that, regular employees seem to.a6 to the°site and remairi,there for their eight hour shift. VC/Torn'§ said the speaker mentioned I11 units. Currently, how many units are there and Mr Gonzales ,re iterated,. he believed there were 10 unites at this time and=wh_atever hu fiber of'unitsiare currently occupied, 71 of the approximately 90 parking.space8Fwere occupied when he visited the site yesterday. The only spaces that=were open were those next to the vacant lot which is where the proposed coristruction i`s'Idcated. VC/Torng said tte Commission has a traffic study and asked that the developer address Mr. Gonzales's concerns. Ms. s Lee Fxpfained that the industrial building consists of 10 units. The applicant signed aifwo-year lease with the ambulance company in January 2013. Initially, their business was very slow. The construction of the proposed building is set to be completed at about the same time that the ambulance company's lease expires (December 2014). During the past two months the (ambulance) business has grown and in fact, the owner approached the leasing company a couple of weeks ago to let them know that his company was growing at a fast pace and asked the landlord if they would allow him to break his lease. Our response to the owner was that he could break his lease anytime, and that we JUNE 25, 2013 PAGE 5 PLANNING COMMISSION would help him find a larger place to accommodate his growing business which we are now doing. We believe that by the time the new building is completed the ambulance company's lease will be up and he will have moved to another location which should solve the parking issue. C/Farago said it appeared there may be overflow parking from the Metrolink and asked if the property owner had any type of security to make sure that only tenants parked in the lot. Ms. Lee said she checked -with Metrolink and was advised that there is additional parking for users. S.tie does not see overflow parking in their lot from Metrolink. VC/Torng said that according to the previous.speaker`'tthere are 10 units. With the addition it will become 11 units. Ms. Lee explained1hpt the 10 units are in the existing building. They will build a "new 11 -unit office building. The ambulance company occupies 2,$00 square feet and; is looking for 7,000 square feet. ri Chair/Nelson asked how the City could ;ble a; moving and Ms. Lee reiterated that the lea Chair/Nelson asked if the ambulance compari) lease and Ms. Lee said he does,,not have the said she would be happy to provide, a copy Commission, if requested. During `bonstructio 11 no new users moving to the site so,ther&WT actual buildintfispgmpleted ' ed that the tenant would be expires in December 2014. mer had a right to renew the ran to renew the lease. She hez lease amendment to the iere are no new tenants and o parking required before the Chair/Nelson asked.'; if the combined parking allocation met the City's developrr erit: standard and whether.the existing property to the north was in violation of the. City s parking standards. Also; does the City have legal recourse to tory Via. rembd'y the `existing condition and, in the event that the ambul2rlde.,comparty's lease is renewed, can the City impose tandem parking or such'° 6c 6umstahces to accommodate more parking on their property. Despite the property owner's assurances, in the event that a landlord wants to retain a tenartw+thich of course is desirable, could be a workable situation. Ms: Lee said this can happen on any property. When a landlord rents to a tenant a business can grow. The ambulance company owner is in such a position;i and 'is in the process of finding another property. Her firm has a reputation0for looking out for the best circumstances for all of their users and tenants':' The investment company does not want to damage itself by acting against tenants who have legal signed contracts. If for any reason the ambulance service wants to stay, they can stay until December 2014 when their lease expires. To reiterate, the ambulance owner initiated the meeting with the landlord and asked for relief. The investment company has no problem breaking the lease because the building offers a very desirable location and the investment company can easily find other users to take that space. JUNE 25, 2013 PAGE 6 PLANNING COMMISSION Chair/Nelson asked if the Commission could impose, as a condition of the use permit, a requirement for tandem parking of the ambulance drivers on their property if necessary in order to prevent parking from flowing onto adjacent streets and adjacent properties. ACA/Eggart responded that if it so chooses, the Planning Commission might consider a condition to provide that the City (City Manager, Community Development Director) has the authority to require a parking study or parking management plan in;; the,,, event that actual parking/circulation problems arise and require the -property owner/applicant to implement recommendations from staff to mitigate those actual traffic problems which tends to be effective because the actuat impacts,,are unknown until the building is built and rented out. C/Farago asked how many ambulances are currently at the existing site and Ms. Lee responded 12-15. The.:n' Mber varies day to day and. during the daytime they dispatch ambulance service which, leaves only 'staff parking. C/Farago said that if the nature of the business is to house or park vehicles as part of their business, would not that have to be considered as part of the parking study because it isnot typical use Iof the parking lot. Could there be some type of restriction as`to the type of business and amount of vehicles that might be parked or impose,afackied,parking for fK, t area? Ms. Lee said she believed the ambulance company obtained, business license from the City at the time they moved in and ft is for`tunate1dnfortunate that their business is growing. They,do,,intend to move out when they outgrow the space. She believes„that the: ;concerns address a potential problem after completion. C/Farago'said that1fthe ambulance service moves out the problem is alleviated unless another ambulance company moves in. GDD/Gubman sat`d the City issued a zoning clearance and a business license for the-Orhbulance°use earlier this year. Regrettably, there were no conditions imposed'on.'that issuance;,to address the number of vehicles and the actual result of haVhq, not only the employee vehicles but the ambulances that would have a multiplier effecYon the parking demand for this use. At this point, going forward, the City--, impose conditions on new tenants coming in and because the property owher owns both parcels it is a feasible way to address the issue. Gomg°:forward;' there can be a condition applied to the Development Review approval tofrequire a parking management plan, prior to some milestone in the permitting -%process for this project, to take into account the continued occupancy of the ambulance company, should it not relocate. From the perspective of meeting the parking requirements in the municipal code, calculating the current and new building needs, a total of 91 parking spaces would be required. There could certainly be a condition imposed that provides some limitation on the number of vehicles per tenant and that can be in combination with provisions to require tandem parking or some other doubling of the existing parking. The City would not allow that for customer parking but certainly for employee and service JUNE 25, 2013 PAGE 7 PLANNING COMMISSION employee vehicles such a condition for a parking plan for the site to address that issue. C/Lin said he did not believe the ambulance business was an issue for this evening because it was a permitted use and the City issued a business license; nevertheless, the City could still have parking problems on this site. The distance between two shared parking lots cannot be greeter than 300 feet and it looks to him like some of the parking spaces are more than 300 feet away on the drawing. The shared private driveway is 31 feet wide and really all that is needed is about 11 feet for each lane which would leave 10 feet for additional parallel parking. SP/Lee said that the existing `fire ,plan shows fire lane designations as striped which would require about a 261b I ot clearance for a fire truck to be able to access the site Q/Lin'°said that in his°.view the parking requirements meet the current regulations. Tenants come and go and it may be the City's negligence in not imposing any =regulations fo Ssr ,,ambulance company. However, since the lease over ins two years it gives the City an opportunity to properly issue new busirless permits with the'` imposition of requirements and perhaps the problem wI'VAo away. He said he has a hard time denying an application that follows the City's parking regulations. C/Lin said that Mr. Gonzales made a;,statement about 0 left turn. When the traffic study was completed, what was"the finding regardidgthose left turn movements and SP/Lee responded that=#here` is a designated left turn lane that allows access to the subject property which is shaven ih the attached traffic analysis report. C/Farago asked if there was any way to initiate a trigger that staff can address this issue with futur,,e-businesses that nay conform to the City's code to avoid future use issues ,thatrrtight interfere'with the permitted parking. CDD/Gubman stated that since ithis is a discretionary entitlement, if there was an existing 66 s16e6s�park elsewhere and they were proposing uses to come and go without any entitl6f tont where the City has discretion there is very little that can be done exceptthrough�epilaborative work with the property owner. In this instance, since the Commission is considering a discretionary action to intensify the use of the property it would be appropriate to impose a condition to address the_;potential parking issue — perhaps a condition could require or limit the nu- 6r,of commercial vehicles to one commercial vehicle per tenant and if a tenant "wanted two commercial vehicles for their place of business the City could require the submittal of a parking plan or some parking management strategy'to mitigate the displacement of parking for other clients that might be visiting. Ms. Lee said that as a business developer they are willing to be restricted for the industrial building site with no ambulance service for that particular type of building. JUNE 25, 2013 PAGE 8 PLANNING COMMISSION Mr. Gonzales said that many times service companies will come in with an F150 or F250 which are commercial vehicles that are often overlooked. With no one else present who wished to speak on this item, Chair/Nelson closed the public hearing. JUNE 25, 2013 PAGE 9 PLANNING COMMISSION C/Lin asked if the distance between the parking lots exceeded 300 feet. SP/Lee responded that the distance is measured from property line to property line and not from parking space to parking space. Since the applicant owns both properties and they are contiguous properties the distance is not an issue. C/Lin moved, VC/Torng seconded, to recommend City Council approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 72067, Development Review and Parking Permit PL2012-455 based on the Findings of Fact, and sp -t, to the conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. Chair/Nelson asked C/Lin to amend his motion to include the condition that "if the existing industrial ambulance service business renews -its lease and there is a parking problem that a parking management' plan be imposed on the use." C/Lin said he would do so and askp.d for clarification from 'the City Attorney about whether the existing warehouse is not a,,subject of this application and ACA/Eggart responded that the existing warehouse is nofbefore the Commission this evening except for thereq gvired "shared parking agreement." So the Commission can require a certain niarpber of spaces to be maintained for the use that is being approved through that shared parking agreement or, proceed with any of the otte€suggestions prov106d_by,CDD/Gubman including allowing the Community Development Director,' to require a parking management plan if deemed necessary ;:C/Lin asked what the magic number was and CDD/Gubman suggested;,,Ihat according to the Resolution there is a Condition (d) ;dn Page 9 under.Parking Permit where it requires "prior to final map app,foval of €eciprocal parking and access agreement for the use and accessibf_,common=drives, etc. he reviewed and approved by the Planning Division, the.Public Works Engineering"'Department and the City Attorney" and it requires recordationuVitIn the L.AgC,6unty Recorder. The Commission could add fo that condition the additional provision of "prior to final map approval and recordation of this!ikiprocal parking requirements that a Parking Management Plan be 'regQired for ony tenant that contemplates the use of more than one commercialweh,icle and commercial vehicle can be defined not in terms of the vehicle code but in the context of being a dedicated vehicle that is on that premises for the purpose of conducting business at that premises. C/Lin,suggested the following: 'Prior to final approval of the plan, the applicant will sub", it,. a Parking Management Plan to the satisfaction of the City." CDD/Gukf`nan concurred. C/Lin said he amended his motion to add the language as stated. VC/Torng seconded the amended motion. The motion was carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Farago, Lin, VC/Torng, Chair/Nelson NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Shah JUNE 25, 2013 PAGE 10 PLANNING COMMISSION 3 a Chair/Nelson reaffirmed that the amended motion met with the approval of the property owner/applicant. PLANNING COMMISSIONER COMMENTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: Chair/Nelson offered a public apology to C/Lin for referring to him as C/Chin during tonight's proceeding. STAFF COMMENTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 9.1 Public Hearing dates for future projects.:. CDD/Gubman stated that the next regular Planning Commission date is July 9; however, there are no items scheduled for that agenda. Therefore;' the nexi scheduled meeting is July 23 and at this time there are currodtiy no items scheduled for that agenda but that is sublo,td change. Steve Nelson, Chairman they would 'not;;be available for the July 23 s': t 5' further business before the Planning Commission, lar meeting at;i310 p.m. to July 23, 2013. day of 2013. Ily Submitted, Greg Gubman Community Development Director Attachment 4 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2013-16 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND APPROVE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 72067 AND PARKING PERMIT PLANNING CASE NO. PL2012-455 TO CONSTRUCT A 21,794 SQUARE -FOOT, NEW TWO STORY PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDING, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO SUBDIVIDE AIR SPACE FOR AN 11 -UNIT OFFICE CONDOMINIUM, AND A PARKING PERMIT TO SHARE DRIVEWAY ACCESS AND PARKING BETWEEN THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND THE LOT TO THE NORTH OF THE PROJECT SITE LOCATED AT 650 BREA CANYON ROAD, DIAMOND BAR, CA 91789 (ASSESSOR' R?RCEL NO. $719-010-901). RECITALS 1.Property owner, Peichin Lee of *Brea,iO,anyon Investments, LLC, filed an application for the following entitlements " 01; Development Review approval to construct a new 21,794 square -foot, two story professional office building; (2) Tentative Traef Map Na. 7.2067 to su64ivide air space for an 11 -unit office condominium; and (3) Parkin,g=:Permit to share t)t)veway access and parking between the -proposed deyelopmer t and the Ion fo the north of the project site located -, 65g :;,Brea Canyon:, Road, :Diamolid Bar, Los Angeles County, Califa n a ("Project Site"). 2. The Project Site is currently comprised of one parcel totaling 0.97 acres. It is located in the Professional Office ;(OP) zone and is consistent with the Light Industrial land `U`se' designation of the General Plan. 3. The legal description of the subject property is Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 16640, The Assessor's Parcel Number is 8719-010-901. 4. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, California Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq. (" CEQX) and CEQA's implementing guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15000 et seq., an initial study Was prepared and it has been determined that the proposed project qualifies fora Mitigated Negative Declaration as the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment by properly conditioning the project ("mitigation measures") to make the project acceptable. In accordance to the provisions of Section 15070 of the CEQA Guidelines, the City prepared and filed a Notice of Availability and Intent to Adopt Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project on May 23, 2013, with the Los Angeles County Clerk. Pursuant to CEQA Section 15105, the public review period for the Negative Declaration began May 31, 2013, and ended June 20, 2013. 5. On June 14, 2013, notification of the public hearing for this project was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin 7 -- newspapers. Public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 500 -foot radius of the project site and public notices were posted at the City's designated community posting sites on June 13, 2013. In addition to the published and mailed notices, the project site was posted with a display board. 6. On June 25, 2013, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing, solicited testimony from all interested individuals, and concluded said hearing on that date. RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined ; and' resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows 1. This Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. The Planning Commissionhas,=indep end'ently considered the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaratspn That was made available for public review, and all other oral and written public`'comments received prior to or at the public hearing prior to adopting this Resolut�Wx 'the Planning Commission finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the City's independent judgment and analysis. The Planning Commission h6naby determines on the basis of the whole record before it;'inclidding the Initial`§tudy and comments received, that there is no substantial evidence that the propbkde !!Project will have a significant effect om4,0 t.environmenf;, and ori that basii"hereby recommends the City Counci(iidopt the,, Mitigated Negative Declaration. The record of proceedings on which the Planning Commission's decision is based is located at the City of Diamondi Bar, 21610 Copley ,Drive, Diamond Bar, California, Community Development De[5artrpent/Planning iDivision. The custodian of record of proceedings is,,th. Directorrof Community Development. The Planning, Commission hereby specifically finds and determines that, having considered the,.recorci as a'whole including the findings set forth below, there is no evidence before this:Planning Commission that the Proposed Project herein will have the potential of an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Based upon substantial evidence, this Planning' Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effects contained in Section 753.5(d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. C. FINDINGS OF FACT Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein and as prescribed under Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Sections 22.48, 21.20.080 and 22.30.050, this Planning Commission hereby finds and recommends as follows: Development Review Findings (DBMC Section 22.48) 1. The design and layout of the proposed development are consistent with the 2 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-16 general plan, development standards of the applicable district, design guidelines, and architectural criteria for special areas (e.g., theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards or planned developments): The proposed office building is consistent with the applicable elements of the City's General Plan, City Design Guidelines and development standards by meeting all of the required setbacks. The proposed building has been designed in a contemporary modern style and incorporates principles of the modern architecture with its simplicity of building form and windows with nonsuperfluous details. In addition, the massing of the entrance/lobby area is taller than the other parts of the building and incorporates ap,'Icove to the building entrance, bringing this element down to a human scql.'OtV They tall glazing openings have mullions to break up the big glass paq@Is;,. and heveals are added on the elevations to break up the flat walls Th building is also consistent with the City's Commercial Design Guidelines Pages 8-.13, which incorporates the following principles: ➢ Monotony of building design as well as busyness is avoided. Variation in wall place, roof line, detailing materials are used to prev4bt monotonous appearance in buildings; �� ➢ Parapet walls oq Cr'o'aked as an integral part of the building design; ➢ The exterior building design, including, roof style, color, materials, architectural form an¢; detaihrg is consistent on all elevations of each h„ibtitrn t' anhievP design harrnonv'and continuity within itself; ➢ Articulation and ;accent cotpr for idem"tity and interest is provided for the ➢ Contains elements which transition to the human scale, particularly near the project site, is nota part of any theme areas, specific plans, community 3. boulevards or planned developments. 2. The design and Layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the use and eriJ9 ti ent of neighboring existing or future developments, and will not create traffico`r pedestrian hazards: The proposed building will not interfere with the use or enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments because the use of the project site is designated for commercial uses and surrounded by commercial uses to the north, east and west. The proposed building will not interfere with vehicular or pedestrian movements, such as access or other functional requirements. A traffic analysis report concluded that the proposed project would not cause any intersections or street segments in the vicinity to operate an unacceptable level of service. All 3 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-16 intersections and roadway segments will continue to maintain an acceptable level of service. In addition, the project site is prohibited from semi -trucks accessing the site due to the narrow width of the driveway. This prohibition would only allow smaller service/delivery trucks to access the site. The project is conditioned to include this prohibition in the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions as well as the reciprocal parking and access agreement, subject to review and approval by the Planning Division, Public Works/Engineering Department and City Attorney. 3. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and.will maintain and enhance the harmonious, orderly and attractive developmeht contemplated by this chapter, the general plan, or any applicable specific plan: The architectural style is a cor compatible with the character visual quality of the neighbort area. 4. The design of the proposed devetof for its occupants and visiting publi aesthetic use of materials, texture appealing: 6m style and is designed to be hood .and further enhances the no specific plan for the project I provide a desi'r'able environment II as its neighbors through good or, and will remain aesthetically The design of the new proposed building is a oahtemporary modern style of architecture variation in the building elements lias been achieved through the utilization of va `its architectural features.sch as higher parapet walls for the ry , � lobby `" trance, talc storefront'olazing at the rear corner of the building, reveals on the eleyations, and different use of building colors and materials. The project has a sense of balance; involving well-proportioned masses and composition The''incorporatlon p6n alcove for the entrance/lobby area brings the buildina to ai intimately scaled, human level. 5. The proposed develd m :nt will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially Injurious (e.g., negative effect on property values or resale(s) of property) to"the properties or improvements in the vicinity: Before the issuance of any City permits, the proposed project is required to comply with all conditions within the approved resolution, and the Building and Safety Division and Public Works Departments, and L.A. County Fire Department requirements. The referenced agencies through the permit and inspection process will ensure that the proposed project is not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. 6. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA): Staff prepared an initial study and determined that the proposed project 4 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-16 qualifies for a Mitigated Negative Declaration as the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment by properly conditioning the project ("mitigation measures') to make the project acceptable. In accordance to the provisions of Section 15070 of the CEQA Guidelines, the City prepared and filed a Notice of Availability and Intent to Adopt Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project on May 23, 2013, with the Los Angeles County Clerk. Pursuant to CEQA Section 15105, the public review period for the Negative Declaration began May 31, 2013, and ended June 20, 2013. Tentative Map Findings: Pursuant to Subdivision Code Section 21.20.080 of the City's Subdivision Ordinance, the Planning Commission makes the following findings: 1. The proposed subdivision, together with ;the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the general plan and any applicable specific plan: The proposed project involves ttlapcondominium subdivision of the site with 11 office units, and approxrrnd 6,y 0.72 acres of parking areas, driveway easements, and landscapiri 'the General Plan land use designation for the site is Light Industrial (1). The prdposedipfoject is consistent with the General Plan land use designation. The projibc, 4i pot a part of any specific plan. 2. The site is phy'sically ,suitable for the type and proposed density of development: The proposed condominium subdivision will be,00nsistent with the General Plan land use'Vesigh ition of Light Industrial, whic i allows for the development of 11 offioc units in a X1,794 square -foot building. The building will have an approximately 52' setback from Brea Canyon Road and 20' from Washington Street andis locatdq •,within an urbanized area adequately served by existing P roadwpys and ,lrifrastructure Therefore the property is physically able to accommodate the proposed deifelopment. 3. The design of the subd�uision or the proposed improvements will not cause substantial envirpnmenk--damage or injure fish or wildlife or their habitat: The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements will not cause substantial envii, nmental damage or injure fish or wildlife or their habitat ,41 because the ekisting site is located in an urbanized area that does not contain habitats or would otherwise injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. 4. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements will not cause serious public health or safety problems: The proposed subdivision or type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health or safety problems because the existing site is located in an urbanized area and is consistent with other similar improvements in the area. 5. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements will not conflict with 5 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-16 easements, acquired by the public at large for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision: 6 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-16 A condition of approval is added to the project requiring a reciprocal parking and access agreement with the existing lot to the north of the project site for the use and access of all common roads, driveways, parking, and easement areas, prior to final map approval. 6. The discharge of sewage from the proposed subdivision into the community sewer system would not result in violation of existing requirements prescribed by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board: The project site shall be served by a separate sewer lateral which shall not cross any other lot lines. In the event that it is, determined that each lot is not serviced by a separate independent sewer lateral, joint sewer maintenance and sewer line easements which cross the lot lines shall be identified in the joint agreements between properties. Therefore, no further environmental review is required. The applicant shall construct the sewer system in accordance with the City Building and Safety Diwsip'#`'and County Sanitation District Standards prior to building occupancy. t 7. A preliminary soils report or geologic hazard report does not indicate adverse soil or geologic conditions: , The existing pad was previously impr6,Wd with buildings. Further grading will be constructed, i operatedm , and aintained in accordance with the recommendations contained -in the preliminary geotechnical investigation to assure that geotechnical stability is-maintainecreased. 8. The proposed §lubdivision is cohsistent°with all applicable provisions of the City's `subdivision `ordinance, the development code, and the subdivision map act: the proposed sub Msldr is consistent with the City's subdivision ordinance, subdivision map:.agt, and applicable development code. The proposed building complies with all required setbacks and development code regulations. 1. The intent of the parking regulations, which is to ensure that sufficient parking will be provided to serve the use intended and potential future uses of the subject site, is preserved: The proposed professional office building is 21,794 square feet, and requires 60 parking spaces. The existing gross floor area of the one story industrial office/warehouse building to the north of the project site is 20,571 square feet, and requires 31 parking spaces. There are 37 spaces proposed to be provided on the project site and the lot to the north has 54 spaces. Therefore, there will be 91 spaces, and will comply with the requirement. 2. A parking permit is approved in compliance with Section 22.30.050 (Reduction of off-street parking requirements for shared uses): 7 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-16 When reviewing parking impacts, the various uses and peak business hours for those uses are taken into consideration. The existing industrial office and warehouse building and the proposed office building have different uses which results in a range of peak business hours and parking demands. In addition, the proposed parking spaces as well as the existing parking supply to the north of the project site are adequate and can accommodate shared spaces. Due to this, staff does not foresee any parking issues resulting from the proposed use. In addition, the property to the north of the project site is not heavily congested or utilized. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein and as prescribed under DBMC Sections 21.20.080 and 22.30.050, this Plannirrg'Cbmmission hereby finds and recommends that the City Council adopt the, Mlitigated !legative Declaration and approve the Development Review, Tentative Traot Map and Parking Permit, subject to the following conditions, and the attached Standard Conditions of Approval: A. GENERAL 1. The subdivision shal)'comply with the Conditions of Approval attached hereto and referenced herdi 2. The applicant shall comply witY„the requirements of Planning and Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works/Engineering Department, and the Los Angeles County Fire Dep'agrneK 3. This approval shall not: be effective' for any purpose until the applicant/owner of the property involved has filed, within twenty-one (21) days of approval of this Development Review, Tentative Tract Map No. 72067 and Parking Permit No. PL2012-455, at the City of Diamond Bar Community, Development ``Department, an affidavit stating that the `applicant/owner is aWarellof,and agree to accept all the conditions of this apprpval. Further, this approval shall not be effective until the applicant pay the; remaining City processing fees. 4 The applicant shall comply with Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22~34.050. A permanent landscape maintenance program shall be, implemented ensuring regular irrigation, fertilization, and weed removalAll landscaping shall be maintained in a healthy, neat and orderl''condition, free of weeds and debris and with operating irrigation at all times. B. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 1. This approval is for the site plan, elevations, exterior materials, and conceptual landscape plans for a new 21,794 square -foot, two-story professional office building to be constructed at 650 Brea Canyon Road, as described in the staff report and depicted on the approved plans on file with the Planning Division, subject to the conditions in this Resolution. 8 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-16 2. The construction documents submitted for plan check shall be in substantial compliance with the architectural plans approved by the City Council, as modified pursuant to the conditions below. If the plan check submittal is not in substantial compliance with the approved Development Review submittal, the plans may require further staff review and re -notification of the surrounding property owners, which may delay the project and entail additional fees. 3. Within five (5) days following approval, the applicant shall submit a $2,156.24 Department of Fish and AGame filing fee pursuant to Section 711.4(c) of the Fish and Game Code,, 4. The Mitigation Monitoring and !ReporQng Program outlined in the Mitigated Negative Declaration and approved by the City shall be implemented and complied with 5. Prior to building permit issuance, landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for review an&gpproval by the City's Cortsµlti'ng Landscape Architect and shall comply with the Water Conservation andscaping Ordinance. 6. The final I 'ndsoape p, ans shall shorn{ that the three Mexican pale verde trees are replaced with i8inon-invasive;�peoi6s, and additional groupings of a more transitional plant layout shal(!�be added along Washington Street and the correr, of WymsW-fn1gton Street and Brea Canyon Road in order to blend into t45, hrr11 'existmg land cape. These items will be verified during landscape plan 1',,,,, ck All existinad landscaping a,)d`' public improvements damaged during construction shall be repaired or replaced upon project completion. 8. Prior't4,;^plan check submittal, submit catalog cut sheets of the parking lot light poles for reviewand approval by the Planning Division. C. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 1. The development shall comply with the specific requirements of Chapter'21.30 (Subdivision Design and Improvement Requirements) and Chapter 21.34 (Improvement Plans and Agreements) of the Subdivision Ordinance, as applicable. 2. The approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 72067 expires within three years from the date of approval if the recordation of the map has not been exercised as defined per Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Section 21.20.140. The applicant may request in writing for a time extension if submitted to the City no less than 30 days prior to the approval's expiration date, subject to DBMC Section 21.20.150 for City Council approval. 9 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-16, 3. Prior to final map approval, the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's) that governs the 11 -unit condominium building shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Attorney. D. PARKING PERMIT 1. Prior to final map approval, a reciprocal access and parking agreement for the use and access of all common roads, driveways, parking, and easement areas shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division, Public Works/Engineering Department and City Attorney, and recorded with the Los Angeles County Recorder's Office. 2. Prior to final approval of the plan, tha applicant will submit a Parking Management Plan to the satisfaction of the City. The Planning Commission shall: (a) Certify to the adoptic (b) Forthwith transmit a of the City of Diamoi 01 Resolution to the City Council APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25T" DAY OF JUNE 2013, BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. WA I, Greg Gubman, Plan n, Resolution was duly intr City of Diamond Bar, at a June 2013, by the followir AYES: :r or, mission Sebretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing ;d `'passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the lar meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of Farago, Lin, VC/Torng, Chair/Nelson NOES: Commissioners: None ABSTAIN: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: ATTEST: Greg Gubman, Secretary None Shah 10 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-16 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS USE PERMITS, COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL NEW AND REMODELED STRUCTURES PROJECT #: F�i 1 SUBJECT: A Development Reu'ew to construct a new 21,7 S PROPERTY OWNER/ APPLICANT: Peichin Lee of Brea canyon Investments, LL N: 650 Brea; Canyon ALL OF THE.FOLLOWI.N„G CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL,, CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION AT (909) 839-7030, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH FAL THE LOWING CONDITIONS: 9. GENERAL 1. In accordance with Government Code Section 66474.9(b) (1), the applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, and its officers, agents and employees, from any claim, action, or proceeding to attack, set-aside, void or annul the approval of Development Review, Tentative Tract Map and Parking Permit No. PL2012-455 brought within the time period provided by Government Code Section 66499.37. In the event the city and/or its officers, agents and employees are made a party of any such action: 11 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-16 12 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-16 (a) Applicant shall provide a defense to the City defendants or at the City's option reimburse the City its costs of defense, including reasonable attorneys fees, incurred in defense of such claims. (b) Applicant shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against the City defendants. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action of proceeding, and shall cooperate fully in the defense thereof. 2. This approval shall not be effective for any purpose until the applicant and owner of the property involved have filed, within twenty-one (21) days of approval of this Development Review, Tentative Tract Map and Parking Permit No. PL 2012-455 at the City of Diamond Bar Community Development Department, their affidavit stating that they are aware of and agree to accept all the conditions of this approval. Further, this approval shall not be effective until the applicants pay remaining City processing fees, school fees and fees for the review of submitted reports !i. 3. All designers, architects, engrneers, and contractors associated with this project shall obtain a Diamond Bar�B6siness License, and zoning approval for those businesses located in Diamond Bar, 1 4. Signed copies of City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX, Standard Conditions, and all environmehtal'rnitigations shall be°Ircluded on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to allaartied involved in the construction/grading activities and ,are not rec(kttred to be wet sealed/stamped by a lice 'ed'�n ineer/Architect,;,' 5. All site;,grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated,for consistency proper to issuance of City permits (such as grading, tree,removal;.enitroachmpnt, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in case of a custem'lot subdIVrsio.n,; or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Revised plans incorporpti'ng all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval during plan check. 7. Prior to'' any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval shall be completed. 8. The project site shall be maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of approval and all laws, or other applicable Federal, State, or City regulations. g. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and any applicable Specific Plan in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 10 Property owner/applicant shall remove the public hearing three (3) days of this project's approval. 13 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-16 notice board within 4 lei 11. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of Planning and Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works/Engineering Department, and the Los Angeles County Fire Department. 12. These conditions of approval shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all future owners, operators, or successors thereto of the property. Non- compliance with any condition of approval or mitigation measure imposed as a condition of this approval, shall constitute a violation of the City's Development Code. Violations may be enforced in accordance with the provisions of the Development Code. 13. To ensure compliance with the provisions of'the City' Council design approval, a final inspection is required from the Planning Division when work for any phase of the project has been completed. The applicant shall inform the Planning Division and schedule an appointment for such an inspection. 14. Failure to comply with any of the conditions set forth herein or as subsequently amended in writing by the City, may result in failure to obtain,':a building final and/or a certificate of occupancy until full compliance is reached. The City's requirement for full compliance may require" minor corrections and/or complete demolition of anon compliance improvement, regardless of costs incurred where the prolect'dnes;nofcomply with design requirements and approvals that ,� the applicant agreed to when permits were pulled to construct the project. FEES/DEPOSITS 1. Applicant shall pay,,,developmlwnt fees (including but not limited to Planning, Building and SafetyDivisions end ,.Public Works Department and Mitigation Monitoring) at,the'established ratO prior to issuance of building permits, as required>,py the City. School fees as required shall be paid prior to the issuance of building.apermt. In addition, -the applicant shall pay all remaining prorated City project `'review and processing fees prior to final map approval. 2. Pnor,, to final ma -p approval, all deposit accounts for the processing of this nrriPH .,hall have!,no deficits. TIME LIMITS 1. The approval of Development Review, Tentative Tract Map, and Parking Permit shall expire within three (3) years from the date of approval if the use has not been exercised as defined pursuant to Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 21.20.140 and 22.66.050(b)(1). In accordance with Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.60.050(.,), the applicant may request, in writing, for a one-year time extension for City Council consideration. Such a request must be submitted to the Planning Division prior to the expiration date and be accompanied by the review fee in accordance with the Fee Schedule in effect at the time of submittal. 14 planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-16 Q E. SITE DEVELOPMENT 1. The project site shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the approved plans submitted to, approved, and amended herein by the City Council, on file with the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 2. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, air conditioning condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berms, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Pianning Diyision. 3. All roof -mounted equipment shall be screen} from pu'blic view. 4. All structures, including walls, trash etirplosure , canopies, etc., shall be maintained in a structurally sound, safe mannor with a clean, orderly appearance. All graffiti shall lid" removed within 72 1 hours by the property owners/occupant. ' 5. No occupancy permit can be granted, until all improvements required by this approval have been properly constructed; inspected, and approved. j'of `a podding permit, the location, size, and screening of all 6. Prior to issuancd building utility service 'donne' loris, including water;, gas, and electric service, fire service, ,and irrigation,conne tJpns shall be 'approved by the Community 111 Developrnent Director. All charttges to,,,building utility connections shall be approved by the ,Comm unK�-Y'Developrnrat Director prior to construction. Building utility connections shall be Iodated, sized and screened in such a manner that they have the least possible impact on the design of the building and site. The architect of recordz; tall be directly involved in the design and placement of all .site and buiiding"'service connections and shall sign all plans submitted to the City which locate, size and/or screen utility connections. 7 "Additional plank materials may be required by the Community Development Director and shall be planted prior to final occupancy in order to screen utility connections, valges, backflow devices, and all above ground appurtenances, etc., to` the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. This determination shall be made in the field after all screen utility connections, valves, backflow devices, and all above ground appurtenances, etc. have been installed and inspected. SOLID WASTE 1. The site shall be maintained in a condition, which is free of debris both during and after the construction, addition, or implementation of the entitlement approved herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether during or subsequent to construction shall be done only by the property owner, applicant or by a duly permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste from 15 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-16 residential, commercial, construction, and industrial areas within the City. It shall be the applicant's obligation to insure that the waste contractor used has obtained permits from the City of Diamond Bar to provide such services. 2. Mandatory solid waste disposal services shall be provided by the City franchised waste hauler to all parcels/lots or uses affected by approval of this project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, (909) 839-7040, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS A 1. In accordance with Government Code Section 66474.9(b) (1), the applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold he the City, and its officers, agents and employees, from any claim actionIiVoi proceeding to, attack, set-aside, void or annul, the approval of Tenl Iracf12067 brought within the time period provided by Government COQ. de`Section 66499.37. In the event the city and/or its officers, agents and employees are rrtade a party of any such action: (a) Applicant shall provide a defense to`'th_e City defendants or at the City's option reimburse the City its costs of defense, including reasonable attorneys fees, incurred in defenseo'fsuch claims. (b) Applicant shall promptly pay=any final lud"tnent rendered against the City The Cityshall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action of proceeding, and shall c9,pperatoully in the defense thereof. 1. The site shall, be maintained in a condition, which is free of debris both during and after the ;construntI86, addition, or implementation of the entitlement granted herein. The rei oval of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether during or subsequent to construction shall be done only by the property owner, applicant or by a duly permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste from residential, commercial, construction, and industrial areas within the City. It shall be the applicant's obligation to insure that the waste contractor utilized has obtained permits from the City of Diamond Bar to provide such services. 2. Mandatory solid waste disposal services shall be provided by the City franchised waste hauler to all parcels/lots or uses affected by approval of this project. 3. Trash receptacles are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Division review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 16 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-16 3. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-ups shall be for individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view. 4. Central trash enclosures shall be equipped with recycling receptacles. C. GENERAL 1. A title report/guarantee showing all fee owners, interest holders, and nature of interest shall be submitted for final map plan check. An updated title report/guarantee and subdivision guarantee, shall be submitted ten (10) business days prior to final map approval 2. A permit from the Los Angeles required for work within its right -o' >rks Department shall be to its facilities. 3. Prior to final map approval, written certification that all utility services and any other service related to the site shall be available to serve he proposed project t and shall be submitted to the City. Such letters shall be issued''by the district, utility and cable television company, within ninety (90) days;pptior to final map approval. ' 4. Prior to fiapprtavallicant shall`submit to the City Engineer the detail nal map` ' app ' cost estimates for bondi'h, purposes of all public improvements. ziTn 5: Prior to final map approvot if any'publi or private improvements required as part of this map have not been' complete�lLby applicant and accepted by the City, applicant shall enter into a subdivisiti'n agreement with the City and shall post the appropriate security ', :r 6 Prwr tie final map, approval all site grading, landscaping, irrigation, street, sewer and storm, drain improvement plans shall be approved by the City Engineer, surety shall`be posted, and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all, ublic and private improvements. 7. Prior to:, issuance, of grading permits, surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all drainage facilities necessary for dewatering all.p'arcels to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 8. Easements for disposal of drainage water onto or over adjacent parcels shall be delineated and shown on the final map or addressed in the CC&R's, as approved by the City Engineer. 9. Prior to any work performed in the street right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Department in addition to any other permits required. 10. Applicant shall label and delineate on the final map any private drives or fire lanes to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 17 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-16 11. Easements, satisfactory to the City Engineer and the utility companies, for public utility and public services purposes shall be offered and shown on the final map. Permission shall be obtained from each utility company for any grading or construction over existing easements. 12. After the final map records, applicant shall submit to the Public Works/Engineering Department, at no cost to the City, a full size reproducible copy of the recorded map. Final approval of the public improvements shall not be given until the copy of the recorded map is received by the Public Works/Engineering Department. nr' � 13. Prior to occupancy, the applicant shall ptgyide to?,ihe City as built mylars, stamped by appropriate individuals certifying the,p]an for all improvements at no cost to the City. � 14. Applicant shall contribute funds to'a separateler ined'n, trust deposit against which charges can be made by the City or its representatives for services rendered. Charges shall be onan hourly basis and shall In'blude any City administrative costs. 15. Applicant shall prgyla'e digitized information in a format defined by the City for all related plans,`at no cosh to the City. , 16. All activities/improvemen# proposd for Tentative Tract 72067 shall be wholly contained within the bound,res of the map. Should any off-site Al activities/improvements be required approval shall be obtained from the affected ,property owner and the City as required by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits 17, A lo line adjustment between Lot'Il and Lot I as shown on the proposed site plan shall qe approved and fully executed prior to grading permit issuance. In additon, conforming deeds shall be submitted to the Public Works/Engineering Department prier to issuance of grading permits. 18. Addresses for each unit shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public Works/Engjneering Department prior to issuance occupancy. D. GRADING 1. No grading or any staging or construction shall be performed prior to final map approval by the City Council and map recordation or grading permit issuance, whichever comes first. All pertinent improvement plans shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval by the City Council. 2. Prior to beginning any grading activities, appropriate rodent barriers shall be installed around the perimeter of the project site to prevent the migration of 18 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-16 rodents to existing residential and commercial sites. A plan detailing the proposed rodent barriers to be used by the developer/contractor shall be submitted to the Public Works/Engineering Department for review. 3. Retaining wall location shall be shown on the grading plan and submitted with a soils report to the Public Works/Engineering Department for review and approval concurrently with the grading plan check. 4. Exterior grading and construction activities and the transportation of equipment and materials and operation of heavy grading equipment shall be limited to between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. Dust generated by grading and construction activities shall be reduced by watering the soil prior to and during the activities and in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 402 and Rule 403. Reclaimed water shall be utilized whenever possible Additionally, all construction equipment shall be properly muffled to reduce noise II�� i ` y 5. All equipment staging areas all be located on the project site. Staging area, including material stockpile and:,equiplent storage area; shale be enclosed within a 6 foot -high chain link fend All access points in the defense shall be locked whenever the construction sYsupervised 6. Grading of the subject property shall be.in accordance with the California ffi Building Code, City Grading Ordinance, Hlfside ,anagement Ordinance and JM acceptable grading practices. 7. At the4 ti ie of submiV.ittal of the'40-scale grading plan for plan check, a detailed soil geology report shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval. Said repoW.rt.;shall beprepared by a qualified engineer and/or geologist licensed Prior to issuance of grading pelmits, storm drain improvement plans shall be approved by the Cify.En ineer and surety shall be posted and an agreement " 6vPrl l+Pri rinnranteeind' apletion of all drainage facilities to the satisfaction of 9. Final grading plans shall be designed in compliance with the recommendations of the final detailed soils and engineering geology reports. All remedial earthwork specified in the final report shall be incorporated into the grading plans. Final grading plans shall be signed and stamped by a California Registered Civil Engineer, registered Geotechnical Engineer and registered Engineering Geologist and approved by the City Engineer. 10. A Standard Urban Stormwater Management Plan (SUSMP) conforming to City Ordinance is required to be incorporated into the grading plan and approved by the City Engineer. The applicant shall incorporate Structural or Treatment Control Best Management Practices for storm water runoff into the grading plans for construction and post -construction activities respectively. 19 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-16 E. F 11. All slopes shall be seeded per landscape plan and/or fuel modification plan with native grasses or planted with ground cover, shrubs, and trees for erosion control upon completion of grading or some other alternative method of erosion control shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and a permanent irrigation system shall be installed. 12. An erosion control plan shall be approved by the City Engineer. Erosion control plans shall be made in accordance to the City's NPDES requirements. 13. Submit a stockpile plan showing the proposed location for stockpile for grading export materials, and the route of transport. :T 14. A pre -construction meeting shall be held '`t the p`r ect site with the grading contractor, applicant, and city grading °,nspecfpr at least 48 hours prior to commencing grading operations. r. 15. Rough grade certifications by-,,06,roject soils and civic engineers and the as - graded geotechnical report sha11 be submitted for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits for:,the foundation of the sidekttial structure. Retaining wall permits may be issued without a rough grade certificate. 16. Final grade certificatiohs,,by project soils and civil engineers shall be submitted to the Public Warks Department prior to the issuance of any project final inspections/certificate of pccupnpy respectively. DRAINAGE 1. All identified flood hazard locations within'the tentative map boundaries which cannot be eliminated as approved by the City Engineer shall be shown on the ,.:finaLCnap and delineated as"Floodp,04szard Area." 2 Storm drainage facilities shall be constructed within the street right of -way or in easements satisfactory to the City Engineer and/or the Los Angeles County 3. Pnor�`to; the issuance of a grading permit, a complete hydrology and hydraulic study shall be prepared by a Civil Engineer registered in the State of California to the satisfacx[gn of the City Engineer. 4. A comprehensive maintenance plan/program shall be incorporated into the CC&R's. STREET IMPROVEMENT 1. The applicant shall replace and record any centerline ties and monuments that are removed as part of this construction with the Los Angeles County Public Works Survey Division. 20 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-16 C l:� 2. Prior to the issuance of any City permits, the applicant shall provide written permission to the satisfaction of the City from any property owners which will be affected by offsite grading. 3. All parking lot improvements shall be completed prior to issuance of any occupancy for the building. UTILITIES 1. Easements, satisfactory to the City Engineer and the utility companies, for public utility and public services purposes sha1L,,be offered and shown on the final map or addressed in the CC&R's 2. Prior to final map approval, a water syS`tern with, appurtenant facilities to serve all lots/parcels in the parcel division diignedoto the Walnut Valley Water District (WVWD) specifications shallbe,protrl�d 3. Prior to final map approval; the applicant shall constCgct or enter into an improvement agreement with the City guaranteeing eorlstriaction of the necessary improvements to the 'Misting water system ap�,p'rding to Walnut Valley Water District,(WVWD) specificati4ns`tp accommodate'the total domestic and fire flows as,my be required by the City Engineer, WVWD and Fire Department �h 4. Prior to final map approval, or issu rce of building permit whichever comes first, written certification that alf utilitys'erviaes and any other service related to the site shall be available to se N&Iffie propose tl' project and shall be submitted to the City.;,Such letters shall be issued by4he district, utility and cable television company, if applicable, within ninety (90) days prior issuance of grading Prior to recordation of final map, applicant shall provide separate underground utility services to each parcel per Section 21.30 of Title 21 of the City Code, in water; gas, electric power, telephone and cable TV, in accordance with, the respective utility company standards. Easements required by the utility companies shall be approved by the City Engineer. 6. Applicant shall relocate and underground any existing on-site utilities to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the respective utility owner. 7. Underground utilities shall not be constructed within the drip line of any mature tree except as approved by a registered arborist. SEWERS 1. Applicant, at applicant's sole cost and expense, shall construct the sewer system in accordance with the City Building & Safety Division and County Sanitation District Standards prior to occupancy. 21 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-16 2. Easements for the existing sewer line which crosses property lines shall be offered in the CC&R's. I. TRAFFIC MITIGATIONS 1. Access for full-sized (WB -40 or larger) trucks to the development shall be restricted/prohibited as identified in the LLG report dated March 26, 2013. The CC&R's shall include the restriction/prohibition. This prohibition shall be applied to all tenants of the existing building and proposed project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 839-7020, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Plans shall conform to current State and, Local Building Code (i.e. Currently the 2010 California Building Code, Califgfnia Plumbing. Code, California Mechanical Code, and the California Electricq) ,C­o&,,e butt the 2013 version will apply if plan check applied after January 1i„ '014)` eequi`rements and all other applicable construction codes, ordinancesand regulations in effect at the time of plan check submittal 2. Provisions for Cal Green shall be jm)3lemdnted onto plans and certification provided by a third party as required by ;the Building Division. Specific water, waste, low VOC, and related conservation ,measures shall be shown on plans. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence=fln'til such time as all California Building, C6d' ' .' and State , Fire' ire iiarsha) red ii tions have been met. The buildings shall b6inspected for compliance.prior to occupancy. 4. Every permit issued by the Building and Safety Division shall expire if the building or woxk atltfior,zed by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the.date 6Fsuch per or,work has discontinued and not been signed off on the job card by the building inspector. 5. Construction activities cau's`ing the operation of any tools or equipment used in construction, drilling, repair, alteration, or demolition work shall be conducted Mon.'— Sat. between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. 6. The project shall Ibe protected by a construction fence to the satisfaction of the Building Official. All fencing shall be view obstructing with opaque surfaces. 7. All structures and property shall be maintained in a safe and clean manner during construction. The property shall be free of debris, trash, and weeds. 8. All equipment staging areas shall be maintained in an orderly manner and screened behind a minimum 6' high fence. 9. Solid waste management of construction material shall incorporate recycling material collection per Diamond Bar Municipal Code 8.16 of Title 8. 22 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-16 10. The minimum design load for wind in this area is 85 M.P.H. exposures "C" and the site is within seismic zone D or E. The applicant shall submit drawings and calculations prepared by a California State licensed Architect/Engineer with wet stamp and signature. 11. This project shall comply with all Accessibility Code requirements including accessible parking, path of travel, elevators, restrooms, drinking fountains, etc. Provide compliance with van accessible parking, path of travel, etc. Reception counter shall comply with the Title 24 accessibility requirements. 12. Submit Public Works Department approved fading plans showing clearly all finish elevations, drainage, and retaining walks cions. 13. Separate permit shall be required for ail wall ar}d monument signs, light poles, and retaining walls" and shall be noted on plans 14. A height and setback survey may be required at oorrloletion of framing and foundations respectively. 15. Prior to Building permit issuance, all school, district fees must,*be paid. Please obtain a form from the Building and Safety Division to take directly to the school district. 16. Provide exit analysis showirig ;occupant load for each space, exit width, exit signs, etc. �• 17. Indicate the proposed addition, and existinebuilding on the plans. Submit code nnrl i, mtifiratinn shOWl't1Ll the folld, inq: foot b 'E4ch bi C. TOO of e Each group occupancy f Property line location in relation to each building (side yard) g Exit analysis for each building (occupant load/corridor rating/exit width/exit gns, etc.) h. Accessod(ty analysis for the entire site and for each building i. Shaft rating/ exterior walls construction/ opening protection 18. Guardrails shall be designed for 20 load applied laterally at the top of the rail. 19. Indicate all easements on the site plan. 20. All retaining walls shall be submitted to the Building & Safety and Public Work Departments for review and approval. 23 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-16 21. Submit grading plans showing clearly all finish elevations, drainage, and retaining wall locations. No building permits shall be issued prior to submitting a pad certification. 22. The project shall be protected by a construction fence and shall comply with the NPDES & BMP requirements (sand bags, etc.). 23. Check drainage patterns with Engineering Department. Surface water shall drain away from building at a 2% minimum slope. 24. Specify location of tempered glass as required by.code. 25. Private property sewer system shall be a`rovedIrthe Los Angeles County Sanitation District. 26. Special inspections and structural observation will'be required in conformance to CBC 1704 to 1709. o 27. A soils report is required and all Iecommendations of the sods.`jeport shall be adhered to. y 28. The applicant sh,atj„ndniact Dig Alert and have underground utility locations marked by the utility comm`iapies prior to any excavation. Contact Dig Alert by dialing 811 or their web 5jte of"k, digalert.ofg. 29. The location i f property lined and b'uildin,q pad may require a survey. 30. AQMD` Ftotification is required at, least 10 days prior to any demolition. 31. All workers ari.a�h job sh?II be ctiyied by workman's compensation insurance under a lice nsed.general contractor`. 32. Any changes to ap'p,roved plans during the course of construction shall be approved by the City prro,;to proceeding with any work. 33. All handrails for accessible features shall be continuous with no jogs or skewed areas. They must remain straight. 34. Landings for ramps in the public way shall be verified prior to permit issuance that they are level with at most 2% cross -slope. Any modification to the ramp shall obtain Public Works approval. 35. Number of plumbing fixtures shall be in compliance with CPC T-4-1. CBC Chapter 29 shall not be used for calculations for plumbing fixtures. 36. Slope setbacks consistent with California Building Code Figure 1805.3.1. Foundations shall provide a minimum distance to daylight. The Footings adjacent to Washington and Brea Canyon shall have the appropriate slope setback. 24 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-16 37. Fire Department approval is required. 38. The use shall not be for medical office. If used for medical office, a covered entry and additional accessible parking will be required. 39. The path of travel from accessible parking to the entry at the v -gutter shall be 2% slope in any direction and shall maintain drainage path to the satisfaction of Public Works and the Building Inspector. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT, (323) 890-4243, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. SUBDIVISION 1. Access shall comply with Sectiorii5'03 of :the Fire Code, which requires all weather access. All weather access may:require paving, Vb 2. Fire Department Access shalle extended to within 150 feet distance of any exterior portion of all structures Ui 3. Where driveways exfend.further than 15Q feet and are of single access design, turnarounds suitable for fire protection eei u pment use shall be provided and shown on the final map, Turnarounds still be IAesigned, constructed and maintained to insure their integrity for Fire Dep -to use. Where topography dictates, - marqu,nds shall be provided for driveways that extend over 150 feet in length: 4. Private driveways shall be indicated on the final map as "Private Driveway and Firelene" with the:wrdths;learly depicted and shall be maintained in accordance with the :_Fire Code. All", ll i4guirp, fire hydrants shall be installed, tested and accepted prior to epristruction. 5. Vehicular access must fie provided and maintained serviceable throughout construction to all required fire hydrants. All require fire hydrants shall be installed, tested and accepted prior to construction. 6. Provide Fire_ Department or City approved street signs and building access number prior to occupancy. 7. The final map shall be submitted to our office for review and approval prior recordation. B. WATER SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS 1. Fire hydrant requirements are as follows: Install 1 public fire hydrant. 25 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-16 2. All hydrants shall measure Tx 4"x 21/2" brass or bronze, conforming to current AWWA standard C503 or approved equal. All on-site hydrants shall be installed a minimum of 25 feet from a structure or protected by a two (2) hour rated firewall • Location: As per map on file with the office. • Other location: See attached map. 3. All required fire hydrants shall be installed, tested and accepted or bonded for prior to Final Map approval. Vehicular access shall be provided and maintained serviceable throughout construction. 4. Additional water system requirements wil be required when this land is further subdivided and/or during the building permit process. 5. Fire hydrant improvement clearance of the Final Map. to our office prior to 26 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-16 Attachment 5 DL1bI0fiD Bi11C FILED NOTICE OF �, i INTENT ADOPT MITIGATED NEGATIVt2 3 2013 DECLARATION City of Diamond Bar, 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765'(909) 839-70 NOTICE: Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA — Public Resources Code, Section 21100 et. Seq.), the City of Diamond Bar has determined that the project referenced hereinafter will not have a significant effect on the environment. A draft Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for review and approval in connection with project approvals and conditions of approval that the City proposes to impose on the project. PROJECT TITLE: Tentative Tract Map No. 72067, Development Review and Parking Permit (Planning Case No. PL2012-455) PROJECT ADDRESS: 650 Brea Canyon Road, Walnut, CA 91789 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Development Review approval to construct a 21,794 square -foot, new two-story professional office building on a 42,333 square -foot (0.97 acre), Office Professional (OP) zoned parcel with an underlying General Plan land use designation of Light Industrial. A Tentative Tract Map is requested to subdivide air space for an 11 -unit office condominium and a Parking Permit to share driveway access and parking between the proposed development and lot to the north of the project site. PROPERTY OWNER: Peichin Lee of Brea Canyon Investments, LLC, 17528 E. Rowland Street #200, City of Industry, CA 91748 APPLICANT: Brea Canyon Investments, LLC, 17528 E. Rowland Street#200, City of Industry. CA 91748 A copy of the Initial Study, documenting reasons to support the findings that said project would not have a significant effect and contains mitigation measures in the project to avoid potentially significant effects, is attached hereto for public review and available at the Planning Division. An Environmental Impact Report is not required for this project. Environmental Determination: Pursuantto the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section 15070, the City prepared an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project. Pursuant to CEQA Section 15105, the public review period for the Mitigated Negative Declaration begins May 31, 2013 and ends June 20, 2013. The Diamond Bar Planning Commission will consider whether or not to recommend approval to the City Council to adopt the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration at the following regularly scheduled meeting: TIME OF HEARING: 7:00 p.m. (or as soon thereafter that the matter can be heard) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 LOCATION: Diamond Bar City Hall — Windmill Community Room 21810 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, California 91765 CASE MATERIALS are available for review between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. Monday through Thursday and 7:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on Friday, at the City of Diamond Bar, Community Development Department/Planning Division, 21825 Copley Dr., Diamond Bar, CA 91765. O:\Tentative Maps\Brea Canyon Rd. 650 TTM PL2012-455\Notice of Intent.doc INITIAL STUDY/ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM CITY OF DIAMOND BAR - 21810 COPLEY DRIVE - DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 - TEL. (909) 839-7030 - 1. Project title: CGM Brea Canyon Business Center (Planning Case No. PL2012-455) 2. Lead agency name and address: City of Diamond Bar, 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 3. Contact person and phone number: Grace S. Lee, Senior Planner, 909-839-7081 4. Project location: 650 Brea Canyon Road, Walnut, CA 91789 (Assessor's Parcel Number 8719-010-901) 5. Project sponsor's name and address: Peichin Lee of Brea Canyon Investments, LLC, 17528 E. Rowland Street #200, City of Industry, CA 91748 6. General Plan Designation: Light Industrial 7. Zoning: Office Professional (OP) B. Description of project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off-site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary) The applicant is requesting a Development Review approval to construct a 21,794 square - foot, new two-story professional office building on a vacant 42,333 square -foot (0.97 acre), Office Professional (OP) zoned parcel with an underlying General Plan land use designation of Light Industrial. A Tentative Tract Map is requested to subdivide air space for an 11 -unit office condominium and a Parking Permit to share driveway access and parking between the proposed development and lot to the north of the project site. 9. Surrounding land uses and setting: (Briefly describe the project's surroundings) North: Office/warehouse building (Light Industry) zone. South: Multiple -Family Residence in RM (Medium Density Residential) zone. West: Office Industrial Park (Light Industry) zone. East: Public Storage Facility (Light Industry) zone. 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): Department of Transportation FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED ENVIRONMENTAL factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at The environmental least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesth Agricultural Resources X Air Qualify Geology/Soils Biological Resources Culturalcs Hazards &Resources Hazardous Materials water Quality Greenhouse Gas Emissions Mineral Resources NoiseHydrology Land Use/Planning Population/Housing Public Services Recreation Mandatory Findings of TransportationlTraffic Utilities/Service Systems Significance X DETERMINATION: (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. rhahethat although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the ct proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. d that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an IRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless ated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier ment pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures ed on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT uired, but it must anal ze onl d that although the proposed projectcould have a significant effect on the environment, because all entially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE CLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that lier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposedn the proposed project, nothing further is required. Signature: Date: 05/23/2013 Printed Name: Grace S. Lee, Senior Planner For: City of Diamond Bar EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact' answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project specific screening analysis). Page 2 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact' to a "Less than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a.) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b.) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c.) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, including a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance. Page 3 0 ISSUES AEST Less than I No Sign fican Impact t Impact Haves a SI Ihstantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? _ X Impact Discussion: There is no scenic vista around the subject property. The project site is located on a vacant lot and the surrounding area is located in an urbanized area. b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not X limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? Impact Discussion: No officially designated State scenic routes or highways occur near the project site. The project site is near the SR 60. The existing site is a vacant lot. There are no scenic resources, trees, rock outcroppings and historic buildings within the vicinity of the project site. c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? X Impact Discussion: The project site is located on a vacant lot and the surrounding area is urbanized. The proposed project will be consistent with the City's Development Code and Citywide Design Guidelines. As such, the.proposed project will not degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surrounding. d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which wouldI I I X adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Impact Discussion: The project site is located on a vacant lot. The surrounding area is currently urbanized. As part of the proposed project, parking lot lighting will be included. To reduce the impact on adjacent properties, any new exterior lighting will be directed away or shielded from adjacent properties and confined within the boundaries of the property pursuant to the development code. With compliance with the Development Code, any significant impact of light and glare will be reduced to a level of insignificance. Page 4 Potentially Potentially Significant Significant Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated Less than I No Sign fican Impact t Impact Haves a SI Ihstantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? _ X Impact Discussion: There is no scenic vista around the subject property. The project site is located on a vacant lot and the surrounding area is located in an urbanized area. b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not X limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? Impact Discussion: No officially designated State scenic routes or highways occur near the project site. The project site is near the SR 60. The existing site is a vacant lot. There are no scenic resources, trees, rock outcroppings and historic buildings within the vicinity of the project site. c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? X Impact Discussion: The project site is located on a vacant lot and the surrounding area is urbanized. The proposed project will be consistent with the City's Development Code and Citywide Design Guidelines. As such, the.proposed project will not degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surrounding. d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which wouldI I I X adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Impact Discussion: The project site is located on a vacant lot. The surrounding area is currently urbanized. As part of the proposed project, parking lot lighting will be included. To reduce the impact on adjacent properties, any new exterior lighting will be directed away or shielded from adjacent properties and confined within the boundaries of the property pursuant to the development code. With compliance with the Development Code, any significant impact of light and glare will be reduced to a level of insignificance. Page 4 II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES. fn determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept, of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to nformation compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Range Assessment project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps X prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? Impact Discussion: The project site is not designated as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance. There are no agricultural activities on or near the proposed project site. Project implementation would not result in the conversion of farmland to non-agricultural use. Therefore the proposed project would have no impacts to farmlands. b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a I I I I X Williamson Act contract? Impact Discussion: Implementation of the proposed project would not conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract. Therefore no impacts would result from the construction or operation of the proposed project. c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest Potentially Potentially Significant Less than No Significant Unless Signifcan Impact Impact Mitigation t Impact ISSUES Incorporated II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES. fn determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept, of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to nformation compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Range Assessment project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps X prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? Impact Discussion: The project site is not designated as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance. There are no agricultural activities on or near the proposed project site. Project implementation would not result in the conversion of farmland to non-agricultural use. Therefore the proposed project would have no impacts to farmlands. b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a I I I I X Williamson Act contract? Impact Discussion: Implementation of the proposed project would not conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract. Therefore no impacts would result from the construction or operation of the proposed project. c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(8)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section X 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined ti.. ,,..,_,_ o. t ('"ia "rtinn 51104(all? Impact Discussion: There are no forestland, timberland or timberland zoned Timberland Production uses that are occurring on-site or in the immediate vicinity. Thus, the proposed project does not involve changes in the existing environment that could conflict with existing zoning or cause of rezoning of forestland, timberland, or timberland zoned Timberland Production. d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to X non -forest use? Impact Discussion: There are no forest land uses that are occurring on-site or in the immediate vicinity. There is minimal amount of vegetation within the area, and no protected trees are located on-site. Thus, the proposed project does not involve changes in the existing environment that could result in loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non -forest use. Page 5 Potentially significant Impact ISSUES e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? significantI Less than I No Unless signtfican Impact Mitigation t Impact E Impact Discussion: There are no farmland uses that are occurring on-site or in the immediate vicinity. Thus, the proposed project does not involve changes in the existing environment that could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural uses. ISSUES Potentially Potentially Significant Significant Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated Less than I No Signif.an Impact t Impact III. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significant criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or !P-r implementation of the applicable air X quality Ian? b) Violate any air tandard or contribute substantially to an X existing or projr quality violation? c) Result in a cumconsiderable net increase of any criteria pollutant fothe project region is non -attainment X under an applicabl or state ambient air quality standard(including releasinions which exceed quantitativethresholds for ozoursol ? X d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant — Impact Discussion for a -d: The proposed project does not involve long-term changes to land use or other growth -inducing actions that could impact compliance with or implementation of the Air Quality Management Plan. The construction of a 21,794 square -foot commercial office building will exceed the thresholds for maximum daily construction emissions for pollutants and therefore mitigation is required and included below. After the completion of the construction activities, it is not anticipated that there will be an increase in emissions from operational activities of a 21,794 square -foot commercial office building. A 21,794 square -foot commercial office building falls well below thresholds for maximum daily operation emissions of 96,221 square feet as defined in Table 6-2 of the South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook for criteria pollutants. Therefore, impacts from operational activities would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures The following mitigation measure will be implemented during demolition and construction activities, consistent with South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 403 in order to reduce PM10 and PM 2.5 emissions. The project will be conditioned to include these mitigation measures, and the developer shall be required to include in contract specifications, indicate on project grading and construction plans, and post at the jobsite. Compliance with these measures will be subject to periodic site inspections by the City. AQ -1 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall develop and submit to the City of Diamond Bar a Comprehensive Construction Dust Control Program. The Program components shall include but not be necessarily limited to the following: • Trucks shall not idle while awaiting or during loading or offloading operations, or when left unattended, or for more than two minutes when not actively engaged in earthwork operations; • Water exposed surfaces frequently (as necessary) to prevent fugitive dust, at least twice daily; • Cover all stockpile of soil/fill with tarps; • Securely cover loads of soil/fill on trucks hauling dirt with tarps before traveling on streets and highways; and • Sweep streets at the end of the day if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent public paved road (recommend water sweepers with reclaimed water). Potentially Potentially Significant Less than No Significant Unless Significan Impact Impact Mitigation t Impact ISSUES Incorporated e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of I X people? Impact Discussion: The proposed project will result in the development of a 21,794 square -foot office building. The proposed project is therefore not expected to generate objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. Construction activity associated with the proposed project may generate detectable odors from heavy-duty equipment exhaust. However this impact would be short- term in nature (only during construction activities) and cease upon project completion. Potentially Potentially Significant Less than No Significant Unless Significan Impact Impact Mitigation t impact ISSUES _ Inco Borated IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: ubstantial adverse effect, either directly or through modifications, on any species identified as a candidate,e, X 7ha:bitat or special status species in local or regional plans,x , or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish me or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Impact Discussion: The project site is in an urbanized area, surrounded by commercial development and multi -family residential to the south. There is minimal amount of vegetation within the area, and no species that are candidate, sensitive or special status species are known to exist in the local vicinity. The proposed project would not result in significant adverse impact to Federal or State listed or other designated species. b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional X plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of v;�k �„a r_ar.,P nr I I S Fish and Wildlife Service? Page 7 viously stated, the project site is in an urbanized area, surrounded by Impact Discussion: As pre amily residential to the south. No riparian habitat or sensitive commercial development and multi-f natural communities exist on-site. According to the Resource Management Element of the City's General Plan, the project site is not identified as having environmental resources. ISSUES Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected I wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act ncluding, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) (i through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? Impact Discussion: No federally protected wetlands occur d site proposed project would not result in any imp d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Potentially Potentially Significant Significant Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated Less than I No Significan Impact t Impact X Therefore implementation of the 0 orridors or native wildlife nurseries exist in the project area. Impact Discussion: No migratory wildlife c Therefore implementation of the proposed project would not result in any impacts in this regard. e) Conflict with any local policies or orolnances p ut— biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or X tected habitat and has minimal amount of Impact Discussion: The project site does not Include pro vegetaion within the area. The proposed project does not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as tree preservation policy or ordinance. f) th ;ontuu WI _.. an adopted Habitat Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other ------a I,,,- l rPninnal. or state habitat conservation 0 tion Plan, Natural Community Conservation Impact Discussion: There are no adopted Habitat Conserva Plans or other approved local, Therefore the proposed project regional, not result te habitat bmpaco nth is on plans applicable to the project area. Page 8 Potentially Potentially Significant Less than No significant Unless Sign,can Impact Impact Mitigation t Impact ISSUES Incorporated V. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project l adverse change in the significance of a X as defined in Section 15064.5?l adverse change in the significance of an X ource ursuant to Section 15064.5? liuniculimi destroy a unique paleontological resource X eolo is feature? Impact Discussion: The project site is located on a vacant lot. It is not located in an area likely to have historical, archaeological, or paleontological resources. The proposed project may have a significant adverse impact if it would cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. This section of the CEQA Guidelines defines a historical resource as one listed in or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Places (per state law), included in a local register of historical resources (as defined by state law) or identified as significant in an historical resource survey (meeting the requirements of state law) or determined by the lead agency (City of Diamond Bar) to be historically significant or significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annals of California, provided the determination is supported by substantial evidence in light of the whole record. Generally, a resource shall be considered by the lead agency to be "historically significant' if the resource meets the criteria for listing on the California Register of Historical Places. In this case, the existing site is not listed in nor eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Places, not listed in a local registrar of historical resources or identified as significant in an historical resource survey, nor has it been determined to be historically significant by the City because it does not meet the criteria for listing on the California Register of Historical Places. Therefore, it does not meet the definition of a historical resource contained in Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines and is therefore less thar significant impact. d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of X formal cemeteries? Impact Discussion: It is not anticipated that human remains exist within the project site. However, should any human remains be encountered during any earth removal or disturbance activities, all activity shall cease immediately and the Los Angeles County Coroner must be notified within 24 hours of the discovery, in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 5097.94. If the coroner determines that the remains are not recent, the corner shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission for consultation in accordance with PRC Section 5097.98. Page 9 Potentially I Significant Significant Unless Impact Mitigation ISSUES VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse affects including the risk of loss injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. Less than No Signincan Impact I Impact 0 Impact Discussion: No active faults are known to traverse the project site and the project site is not located within, or immediate adjacent to an Alquist-pdEarthquake Fault Zone. Therefore, rupture of a known earthquake fault would not occur within the project area. Adherence to standard engineering practices and design criteria relative to seismic and geologic hazards in accordance with the 2010 California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen) is required. Conformance to these requirements would be applied to the proposed project as standard conditions of project approval. v ally ctive faults Impact DiscussionSuthern California ha that could imp ctrthe proous ject sve f e.poThelCty of DiamondtBarcis in produce strong ground proximity to the San Andreas and Sierra Madre Fault zone. The 2010 California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen) requires structural design and construction methods that minimize the effects of strong seismic ground shaking. The CALGreen requirements would be applied to the proposed project as standard conditions of project approval. v Impact Discussion: The project area is located within a portion of the City that is not subject to liquefaction. Therefore project implementation is not anticipated to result in the exposure of people or structures to potential impacts related to seismic ground failure or liquefaction. The proposed project required the submittal and approval of a preliminary for the Impact Discussion: investigation report. This report indicated that the the project site is suitable in e report geotechnical development of a two-story commercial) officebuild�aton.ing wItThereforeh eismically- c�he potenitialsfor s incorporated into the projects design an related landslides is less than significant. in substantial soil erosion or the loss of X Impact Discussion: The largest source of erosion, particularly in an urban environment is uncontrolled drainage during construction. Erosion potential during construction would be managed to the maximum extent practicable with Best Management Practices (BMPs). The proposed project is required to be System (NPD covered under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination ES) General Construction site during demolition and Permit; therefore construction BMPs would be implemented on the project construction activities to minimize erosion impacts. Implementation of the construction -related BMPs would reduce potential construction -related impacts to the maximum extent feasible. The operation of the project site would not cause the loss of topsoil or erosion because the site would be landscaped and paved. page 10 Potentially Potentially Significant Less than No Significant Unless Significan Impact Impact Mitigation t Impact ISSUES Incorporated located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that Be: become unstable as a result of the project, and X X rc)Be potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? Impact Discussion: Soil under the project site has been analyzed in the geotechnical investigation report. The report indicates that with the recommendations in the report incorporated into the project's design and job specification, the subject site is suitable for the development of a two-story commercial office building. The potential of an on-site and off-site landslide, liquefaction, lateral spreading or collapse is not likely. Therefore, the proposed project would result in less than significant impacts related to development on an unstable soil unit. d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 1804.2 of the California Building Code (2007), creating substantial risks to X life or property? Impact Discussion: As described above, the project site is stable. Soil under the project site was investigated and the geotechnical investigation report indicates that the incorporation of recommendations into the project's design and job specification, the subject site is suitable for the development of a two-story office building. Therefore, potential impacts from expansive soils would be less than significant. soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of eptic tanks of alternative waste water disposal systems X X re)7Have here sewers are not available for the disposal of waste ater? Impact Discussion: The project site is not located on unstable soil. The project would be served by the public sewer system, thus there is no impact on soils inadequately capable of supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems. - Potentially Potentially Signfcant Less than No Sign cant Unless Significan Impact Impact Mitigation t Impact ISSUES Incor orated VII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSION. Would the project., Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the X environment? [bb)Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse X ases? Impact Discussion for a and b: Many of the world's leading scientific experts agree that greenhouse gases (GHGs) generated by human activities affect climate by increasing the "greenhouse effect." The gases concentrate in the Earth's atmosphere and trap heat by blocking some of the long -wave energy the Earth normally radiates back into space. Human activities that produce GHGs are the burning of fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas for heating and electricity, gasoline and diesel for transportation); methane from Page 11 lobal landfill wastes and raising livestock, deforestation activities; and some agricultural practices. hese activities are increasing the greenhouse gases in the Earth's atmosphere and could be accelerating g climate change.from ttheeS eravNevadansnow pacgk, which could conseuences in llresult infornia oa reduuld ction inyimported water, include a andd in water supply public health problems due to degraded air quality and more intense summer heat. In 2006, Governor Schwarzenegger signed AB 32, the California Climate Solutions Act of 2006. AB 32 requires that statewide GHG emissions be reduced to 2000 levelsb 2050. the year 201 redb I the year 2020, and to 80 percent less than 1990 levels by year accomplished through an enforceable statewide cap on GHG emissions that will be phased in starting in 2012. To effectively implement the cap, AB 32 directs the California Air Resources Board (CARB) to develop and implement regulations to reduce statewide GHG emissions from stationary sources. AB 32 specifies that regulations adopted in response to AB 1493 should be used to address GHG emissionbe s from vehiclesHowever, AB 32 so includes language he 493 ulaons implemented, then CARB should develop stating t develop new regulations to vehicle 1GHG emissions undertthe authorization of AB 32. AB 32 requires that CARB adopt a quantified cap on GHG emissions representing 1 f emissions levels and disclose how it arrives at the cap; institute a schedule to meet the emissions cap; and nis state achieves reductions inms to ensure that the eGHG lop remissiions necessarydto meet hencape Ina2007, CARB adopted the statewide 2020 emissions cap at 427 million metric tons (MMT) equivalent carbon dioxide (CO2e) greenhouse gas emissions. CARB estimated that 2020 'business -as -usual' emissions (meaning, emissions of greenhouse gases without consideration of climate change) would be o MMhe 2020 therefore, emissions will need to be reduced by 169 MMTCO2e (2B percent) statewide to meet the 2020 threshold. AB 32 also includes guidance to institute emissions reductions in an economically efficient manner and conditions to ensure that businesses and consumers are not unfairly affected by the reductions. A numerical threshold to determine the significance of greenhouse gas emissions has not been established by the City or SCAQMD. Global climate change is not confined to a particular project area and is generally accepted as the consequence of global industrialization over the last 200 years- on typical pro e i, even en everyglolalrg one, mate does not generate enough greenhouse gas (GHG) change significantly; hence the issue of global climate change is, by definition, a cumulative environmental impact. The State of California, through its governor and legislature, has established a comprehensive framework for the substantial reduction of GHG emissions over the next 40 -plus years. This will occur primarily through the implementation of AB32 and Senate Bill 375 (SB375), which will sed project address ot expected emissions generate p potentially significant greenhouse gases eby developing a less, the 121,794o sneosquare-foot commercial office building. Therefore, no new significant impacts are anticipated and no mitigation measures are necessary at this time. Page 12 ISSUES VIII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous Potentially I Significant I Less than I No Significant Unless Significan Impact Impact Mitigation t Impact 0. materials Impact Discussion: The proposed project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment from the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. Small amounts of hazardous materials may be found in solvents and chemicals used for cleaning, building maintenance, and landscaping. The materials would be similar to those found in common household projects or pesticides. Hazardous materials used in construction and operation of the proposed project would be subject to City, State, and Federal regulations, reducing impacts to a less than significant level. b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonable foreseeable upset and accident conditionsLLJ ( involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Impact Discussion: The proposed uses are not anticipated to result in the creation of health hazards following compliance with health and safety regulations. The proposed uses would not use, generate or dispose of hazardous materials in large quantities. As stated above, hazardous materials used in construction and operation of the proposed project would be subject to City, State, and Federal regulations, reducing impacts to a less than significant level. c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely I I I I X hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school Impact Discussion: The proposed project would not involve the transport, use, handling, or disposal of notable quantities of hazardous materials, aside from normal household chemicals and landscaping applications. Therefore, the proposed project would not pose a health risk to nearby schools, and no cinnitirant impacts to schools would result from the construction and operation of the proposed project. d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code X Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? impact Discussion: The project site is currently a vacant lot. The existing uses do not use, handle, or store hazardous materials. Development of the proposed project would not create a significant hazard to the public or to the environment. Therefore no impacts would occur in this regard. Page 13 Potentially Significant Less than No Significant Unless Significan Impact Impact Mitigation t Impact ISSUES nco posted e) For a project located within an airport land use plan, or where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public X airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? Impact Discussion: The project site is not located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of an airport. Therefore, no impacts would occur in this regard. f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? X Impact Discussion: The project site is not located within an airport land use plan with within two miles of an airport. Therefore, no impacts would occur in this regard. g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an X adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation Impact Discussion: Emergency vehicles would have access to the project and surrounding roadways upon completion of the proposed project. The proposed development of a 21,794 square -foot commercial office building would not impact access to emergency response. In addition, the proposed development would not place temporary or permanent barriers on existing roadways or reconfigure existing roadways. Therefore, no impacts would result from the construction and operation of the proposed development. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? 0 Impact Discussion: The project site and surrounding areas are predominantly built out and no wildlands occur within or adjacent to the project site. Future development as a result of project implementation would introduce ornamental landscaping, which is not anticipated to create hazardous fire conditions. Potentially Potentially Significant Less than No Significant Unless Significan Impact Impact Mitigation t Impact ISSUES __tIncorporated IX. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge I I X Impact Discussion: The proposed project will not be allowed to violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB) has adopted a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for storm water discharges associated with construction activity. Compliance with Statewide NPDES General Permit for Strom Water Discharges Page 14 associated with construction activity which would prevent storm water pollution from impacting waters of the U.S. in the vicinity of the project area, will be required. Potentially Potentially Significant Less than No Significant Unless Significan Impact Impact Mitigation t Impact ISSUES Incor orated ly deplete groundwater supplies or interfere lly with groundwater recharge such that there would cluding through the alteration of the course of a streamX ficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface 7:tially er table level (e.g., the production rate of pre- [Ang X a manner which would result in flooding on- or off - arby wells would drop to a level which would not isting land uses or planned uses for which permits havebeen ranted)? Impact Discussion: The level of the proposed excavation will not reach the aquifer, thus the proposed development will not substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or lowering of the local groundwater table level. c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream X or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? Impact Discussion: There are no streams or rivers nearby. The Public Works/Engineering Department is requiring that, prior to approval of a grading plan, the applicant shall prepare and submit a drainage study, including supporting hydraulic and hydrological data to the City for review and acceptance. The proposed development will not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. There will also be specific use guidelines for water conservation in the irrigation of planted areas. These guidelines include but not limited to water sensors, programmable irrigation timers, differing water quantity zones, and drought tolerant plants. alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or cluding through the alteration of the course of a streamX or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface 7:tially a manner which would result in flooding on- or off - Impact Discussion: There are no streams or rivers nearby. The Public Works/Engineering Department is requiring that, prior to approval of a grading plan, the applicant shall prepare and submit a drainage study, including supporting hydraulic and hydrological data to the City for review and acceptance. The proposed development will not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area or substantially increase the rate of amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on - or off-site. --F e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the 11 F capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? Impact Discussion: See Response c and d above. Page 15 PotentiallySignificant Less than No Significant Unless Significan Impact Impact Mitigation t Impact Incorporated ISSUES Y f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality I � Impact Discussion: See Response a and b above. g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped X on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Ma or other flood hazard delineation ma ? X h) Place within a 100 year flood hazard area structures which would im ede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or X death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? site is not located within a flood zone. Additionally, the City of Impact Discussion for g is The project major flood hazards, or potential inundation due to nearby dam Diamond Bar is not subject to any ma ency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate failures. Furthermore, the Federal Emerg lood Zone'W'. Flood Zone "X" is identified as an area of 0.2 Map designated the entire City as within a F osed project would not involve the placement of structures percent annual chance of flood. The prop within a 100 -year flood hazard area. tsunami, or Impact Discussion: The proposed project site is approximately 40 miles inland from the Pacific Ocean and there are no large bodies of water within the vicinity of the project site that would cause inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. Therefore no impacts would result from the construction and operation of the proposed project. Potentially I Significant I Less than I No Significant Unless Significan Impact Impact Mitigation t Impact ISSUES X. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: Impact Discussion: The proposed project site would not disrupt or physically divide an established community. The project site is a vacant site, surrounded by an office/warehouse building to the north, office industrial park to the west, public storage facility to the east, and multi -family residential to the Z tncy ith any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation with jurisdiction over the project (including, but to X the general plan, specific plan, local coastal or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoidina or mitigating an environmental effect? Page 16 Impact Discussion: In accordance with Title 21 of the City of Diamond Bar's Subdivison Code, the project applicant has requested the approval of a Tentative Tract Map to subdivide air space for an 11 - unit office condominium building on an existing vacant 42,333 square -foot (0.97 acre) lot. The applicant has also submitted a Development Review application for the approval of the project's architectural and site design. With the approval of these entitlements, the development of the proposed project would be in compliance with all applicable City of Diamond Bar's land use plan, policy, and regulations. ISSUES c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural Potentially I significant I Lessthan I No Significant Unless significan Impact Impact Mitigation t Impact X Impact Discussion: The proposed project site is not included in any habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. ISSUES XI. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the Potentially I Significant I Less than I No Significant Unless Significan Impact Impact Mitigation t Impact 94 Impact Discussion: The project site is not identified as a site with known mineral resources that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state. Therefore, the proposed project would have no impacts to mineral resources. b) Result in the loss of availability of alocally-important mineral _FT X resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, of standards established in the local general plan or noise ....,...a;...,lon nr nthpr land nCe elan? ,A;...,.,., nr nnntirahlp standards of other agencies? Impact Discussion: The proposed project will not result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan, haranse the site contains no known mineral resources. Potentially Potentially Significant Less than No significant Unless signifcan Impact Impact Mitigation t Impact ISSUES Incur orated XII. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess X of standards established in the local general plan or noise ,A;...,.,., nr nnntirahlp standards of other agencies? Impact Discussion: There will be a temporary increase in noise levels during construction of the project, but it will not be substantial and must remain within noise limits established by the City. The City of Diamond Bar's Municipal Code, Chapter 8.12 Division 3, Section 8.12.720 prohibits construction -related Page 17 on on 7iOO noise between the hours of 7:00 p -m. and than ten days)operationationtoftmlobile con structionuequipmendt holidays. Noise from the short-term may not exceed a maximum of 85at ble wtl hlttheesur ounding usey, the s dthat sur ound the proj ct site, s nce it commercial office building is comp public storage facility, and south of an is located to the east of an office industrial park, west of a p office/warehouse building. The proposed use is not expected to exceed noise levels set forth in the Municipal Code for commercial uses. Potentially Potentially Sig 1 11caI t Less than No Significant unless Slgnifican Impact Impact Mitigation t Impact ISSUES U) Exposure of persons to or generrattionof Ak e I X roundborne vibration or roup orn -- — orne Impact Discussion: Construction, Howeveactivities h have the cts potential ole woutabeotemporary and bof mnbmalodura6onr Additionally, implementation of the construction hours would restrict these activities to daytime hours only. c) X A substantial permanent increaselnna beenhouthe project?ls to the Impact Discussion: The ambient noise levels will not substantially increase and will be compatible with the noise levels in the surrounding area. d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise X levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the Ni u� se of trucks to bring construction materia Impact Discussion: Construction activities would require the u to the site, which would contribute to ambient noise in the project area. The truck noise would be the on temporary and sporadically distributed ail throughout Sundays and lgal leactholivities and would be limited to between the hours of 7 a.m. to 7 p. Y located within an airport land use plan or, wnere e) For a project X such a plan has not been adopted, projectl milesexpoo a public airport or public use airport, residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Impact Discussion: Construction of the proposed projectbwloulhave r°w thincan with lanrdsd uairse The project area is not located within 6 miles of an pairport Therefore, no impacts would occur. f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the X project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? roposed ct no impact th regards private Discussion: project areaconstructiis onnot locof the ated d withinpthe evicinity lof a private airstrip, l Therefore, oo impacts would occur. Page 18 Potentially Potentially Significant Less than No Significant Unless Significan Impact Impact Mitigation llmpact ISSUES Incorporated XIII. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or X indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, X necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the X construction of replacement housingelsewhere? Impact Discussion for a -c: The increase of office space is not significant in the context of the City as a whole or substantial for the area. The project site is an existing vacant lot. There is no housing and therefore will not displace housing or people as a result of this project. Page 19 ISSUES XIV. PUBLIC SERVICES. a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: i) Fire protection? ii) Police protection? iii) Schools? iv) Parks? ,A nthpr nublic facilities? Potentially I Significant I Less than I No Significant Unless Significan Impact Impact Mitigation t Impact X X X X Impact Discussion: The marginal increase of office space from the proposed project are well within those anticipated in the City's General Plan, and would not require the provision of new or altered governmental facilities for fire protection, police protection, schools, park, or other public facilitieict s. However, the applicant is required eor itprocess infees orderr tothe helpWalnut meet the potential f ndinSchool gDnleeds (WVUSD) as part of the building p P created by the proposed increase in population. Potentially Significant Less than No Significant Unless Signifcan Impact Impact Mitigation t Impact Incor orated ISSUES XV. RECREATION. a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood X and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the X construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? project would not trigger the new construction or expansion of Impact Discussion for a -b: The proposed recreational facilities. It is not expected that there would be use of the existing neighborhood recreational facilities by employees of the businesses on-site. Therefore no impacts would occur. Potentially Potentially Significant Less than No Signifcant Unless significan Impact Impact Mitigation t Impact ISSUES ncor o ated XVI TRANSPORTATION ! TRAFFIC. Would the project: ith an applicable plan, ordinance or policy a)7circulation ing measures of effectiveness for the performance of ation system, taking into account all modes of X ation including mass transit and non -motorized X d relevant components of the circulation system, but not limited to intersections, streets, highways aays, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? Impact Discussion: A traffic impact analysis (TIA) was prepared for this project. The study found that the proposed project would not result in significant impacts to the Brea Canyon Road at Currier Road, Washington Street, Lycoming Street, SR -60 West Bound ramp intersections, and Golden Springs Drive at SR -East Bound ramps. These intersections are projected to operate at Level of Service (LOS) D or better during peak hours. LOS D is the minimum level generally considered to be acceptable for urban intersections. The City of Diamond Bar's General Plan calls for LOS D as the minimum acceptable service level at an intersection, while LOS C is the minimum for roadway segments. According to CMP Guidelines, the minimum acceptable service level at CMP intersections is LOS E. A project would be considered significant if the LOS changed from D or better to and E or F. an applicable congestion management program, uding, but not limited to level of service standards and rb)Con-flictwith el demand measures, or other standards established by X county congestion management agency for designated ds or highways? Impact Discussion: The TIA found that the proposed project would not exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the County Congestion Management Agency for designated roads or highways. The proposed project will not adversely impact the Congestion Management Program arterial monitoring intersections including freeway on and off -ramp intersections and mainline free -way monitoring stations because the added AM and PM peak hour project generated trips to the adjacent street system does not require a CMP analysis. As there is not a significant impact at these intersections, no traffic mitigation measure/improvement is required or recommended. c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in F X substantial safe risks? Impact Discussion: The proposed project will not result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks because there is no airport nearby. Page 21 Potentially I Significant I Less than I No Significant Unless Slgnifcan Impact Impact Mitigation t Impact ISSUES d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., I I I X sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.q., farm equipment)? Impact Discussion: The proposed project would not create any hazards due to design features or incompatible uses. Access to the project site would be required to comply with all City design standards, which would reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. Full-sized WB -40 and WB -50 trucks (semi -trucks) are prohibited from accessing the site and is included in the Covenant, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) for the proposed condominium building. This prohibition would only allow SU -30 trucks and smaller for service/delivery trucks to access the site. e) Result In inadequate emergency access? I I X Impact Discussion: The proposed project would not significantly impact the adequacy of existing and future emergency services. The roadways and driveways are existing and will not be relocated. The proposed project would be constructed according to City of Diamond Bar and County of Los Angeles requirements for emergency access. Therefore significant impacts would not result from the construction and operation of the proposed project. Result in inadequate Impact Discussion: The proposed project will provide adequate parking with shared on-site parking spaces with the parcel to the north to meet the City's parking code requirements. Demand for parking created by the proposed project will be provided on-site, with reciprocal parking spaces shared with the lot to the north of the project site. The project will be conditioned to require that a reciprocal parking and access agreement be recorded with the final map. Mitigation Measures The project will be conditioned to include the following mitigation measure: T-1 A reciprocal access and parking agreement for the use and access of all common roads, driveways, parking, and easement areas shall be recorded with the final map. g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding X public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? Impact Discussion: The roadways are existing. The proposed project would be constructed according to City of Diamond Bar and County of Los Angeles requirements. Therefore significant impacts would not result from the construction and development of the proposed project. Page 22 XVII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Potentially Re ional Water Qualit Control Board? the roject's slid waeral, Potentially SigniF�cant Less than No state, alocalwaste? mimpp Significant Unless Signmcan Impact Impact Mitigation t Impact ISSUES ncor orated XVII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable X Re ional Water Qualit Control Board? the roject's slid waeral, b) Require or result in the construction of new water or state, alocalwaste? mimpp wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing X facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Impact Discussion for a -b: The proposed project would not result in significant impacts and would not exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board, and would have a less than significant impact on the need to construct new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities. c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the X construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Impact Discussion: The proposed project would not result in significant impact on the need to construct storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities. -F-F d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project _F from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? Impact Discussion: The proposed project would develop 21,794 square feet of commercial use and would create an incremental increase in demands for existing and future water supplies. However, neither a Water Supply Assessment nor Water Supply Verification, as required by Senate Bill 610 (Costa) and 221 (Keuhl), are required for the proposed project since the proposed commercial space is well below 500,000 square feet of commercial space. e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate X capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to theprovider's existing commitments? Impact Discussion: The project would not trigger the need for new construction or expansion of existing facilities. landfill with suicient the roject's slid waeral, state, alocalwaste? mimpp Impact Discussion for f -g: The City of Diamond Bar is served by Valley Vista. The company hauls nonrecyclable solid waste to the Puente Hills Landfill. This facility has enough capacity to accept solid waste until the year 2020, according to the disposal company. All solid waste materials generated at the Page 23 project site would be disposed of in accordance with applicable state, federal, and local statutes and regulations. Potentially Significant Significant Unless Impact Mitigation ISSUES XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or Less than I No significan Impact t Impact X Impact Discussion: The project site does not contain the habitat of a fish or wildlife species and therefore construction of the proposed project would not cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, or reduce or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal. Likewise, approval of the proposed project is not anticipated to eliminate examples of major periods of California history or prehistory. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are X considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? Impact Discussion: The cumulatively considerable impacts of the individually limited project are not expected to be significant and are in keeping with the long-range considerations of the City's General Plan. With the conditions of project approval and proposed mitigation measure, the cumulative impact of the individually limited project impacts will not be considerable. c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause X substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or Impact Discussion: With the conditions of project approval and proposed mitigation measure, no substantial direct or indirect adverse environmental effects on human beings can be expected from this project. Grace S. Lee 05/23/2013 Name Date Senior Planner Si p1 re s Title Page 24 SOURCES CITED IN THE EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Planning Case PL2012-455 1. General Plan of the City of Diamond Bar adopted July 25, 1995 2. General Plan of the City of Diamond Bar, Environmental Impact Report and Addendum dated July 25, 1995 3. Municipal Code, City of Diamond Bar 4. Architectural and Grading Plan 5. Hydrology Study and Hydraulic Calculation Prepared by Cal Land Engineering, Inca Dated February 6, 2013 6. Geotechnical Engineering Investigation Report Prepared by Cal Land Engineering, Inc. Dated September 28, 2012 7. Traffic Impact Analysis Report Prepared by Linscott, Law and Greenspan Dated March 26, 2013 8. Environmental Mitigation and Monitoring Program — Attachment A 9. All documents cited above are available for review at the City of Diamond Bar, Community Development Department, 21825 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765. The office hours are Monday through Thursday between 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m., and Friday between 7:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Page 25 LO LO N T O N �a �o z OW U) ZU 0 N Z Ll.. Oz F- z Z Q O 'j 5; a Z O W ui CD U F - U) W z U) m z O z Q U Q W w /m V U 2 U a a c �/J @ C CO D C C . >> a m Ee ❑ J C @m T 01 O O C @ O N Lu 1. mu, @ E� - L U Q c m E rn U1 m O N =_ dd O m U N C 0 0 @ U @ o C @ @ @ y U 0= E ¢ p@ u U N C@ N 0 .< d ` N @ N N_ @ p N E N Q� @ N U C w N @@ o N N c ''.. m p U c U o ._ m @ E 5 U p e g@@ N G L 0 3 � E w z.woUU �o�o s E R o 3 a' aoi n r m N O y N N N 0 N y R N 0 O C _ L N ` O C N b 0 @ o d @ m m .O L < O � o Q Q a p a m �/J @ C O C � C N U1 m O N O 9 U O C O y O L @ @ o L 0 3 � E w 3 O 3 �E U R ¢ _ L N ` O C N b 0 R N U w N N O) L T @ •- L o 3 ..c- d asci m E L N N O R O O ON m U p > - N @ C Q O N O R ¢ ¢ m LC u o m m 3 2 >R C) Cf) a wCf) m Ed 'cu >0 0 M 0 z 5; Z M M Lu Ed Attachment 6 ECEI_VE JUN 12 2013 REVISED TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT CITY OF DIAMOND BAR BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER PROJECT Diamond Bar, California March 26, 2013 Prepared for., BREA CANYON INVESTMENT, LLC. 17528 EAST ROWLAND STREET CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91748 and CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 21825 E. Copley Diamond Bar, CA 91765 LLG Ref. 2-12-3332-1 E. rIK No. 2006 *n.Exp. 6 30 13 „ Prepared by. Under the Supervision of Shane S. Green, P.E. Richard E. Barretto, P.E. Transportation Engineer III Principal Unseen, Law & Greenspan, Engineers 2 Executive Circle Suite 253 Irvine, CA 92614 949.625.6175 r 949825.6173 F v w v,llgengineersxam TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION NAGE 1.0 Introduction................................................................................................................................: 1 1.1 Study Area..............._......................................................................................._...................... 2 1.2 Study Scope ... ..... ._....................._......................,......_.....__...................................................2 2.0 Project Description..................................................................................................................... 3 3.0Existing Conditions..................................................................................................................... 4 3.1 Regional Access........................................................................................................................ 4 3.2 Existing Traffic Volumes ... ........... .................. .......... ......... ........... ........... _....... ........... .......... _. 5 3.3 Existing Intersection Conditions ................. ........ ._... ................. ...... ..... .................. .._.....:........5 3.3.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Method of Analysis ......... ................ ........... _.... 5 3.3.2 highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Method of Analysis (Unsignalized Intersections).... 7 3.4 Existing Level of Service Results ....... ..._.... ....... ..... .._..... ............ .................... ........... ......... .... 7 4.0 Traffic Forecasting Methodology 5.0 Project Traffic Characteristics ............................................ 5.1 Project Traffic Generation .................................................. 5.2 Project Traffic Distribution and Assignment ...................... 5.3 Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions ............................ 6.0 Future Traffic Conditions ............................... 6.1 Ambient Traffic ............................................. 6.2 Cumulative Projects Traffic Characteristics.. 6.3 Year 2034 Traffic Conditions ............. .......... 6.4 Year 2014 and Year 2034 Traffic Volumes... 6.4.1 Year 2014 Traffic Volumes ................... 6.4.2 Year 2034 Traffic Volumes ................... 7.0 Traffic Impact Analysis Methodology ........... 7.1 Impact Criteria and Thresholds: ..................... 7.1.1 City of Diamond Bar .............................. 7.2 Traffic Impact Analysis Scenarios ................. 10 ......................11 11 ...................... 11 ....... 14 ....................19 .................... 19 .................... 19 .................... 19 8.0 Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analysis............................................................................. 20 8.1 Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions................................................................................ 20 8.1.1 Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions ....... ........... ......... ..................... ...................... 20 8.2 Year 2014 Traffic Conditions................................................................................................. 22 8.2.1 Year 2014 Cumulative Traffic Conditions .......... ............................................... ....... .... 22 8.2.2 Year 2014 Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Conditions ................................................. 22 8.3 Year 2034 Traffic Conditions._.............................................................._.............................. 24 8.3.1 Year 2034 Cumulative Traffic Conditions ................. ......... .......................................... 24 8.3.2 Year 2034 Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Conditions ................ ............................... . 24 LINSCOTT, LAW 8 GREENSPAN, engiMOM I UG Ref. 2-12-3332 Brea Canyon Business Center Project, Diamond Bar 1y�,-11331 rx.aUus mgDe¢ li L�er- R ­6P�,(s .Bi _C "Al TI i2_-1'dlc TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) Cvrnnu rAom 9.0 State of California Caltrans Methodology •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 26 9.1 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Method of Analysis (Signalized Intersections) .............. 26 9.2 Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions ..................................... .... ....... ................._............ 26 9.3 Year 2014 Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Conditions ................... ...... ..._..... ................. 29 9.3.1 Year 2014 Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Conditions ............. ............... ....... ....... 29 10.0 Site Access Evaluation.............................................................................................................. 32 10.1 Level of Service Analysis For Project Access ............................................ 32 10.2 Internal Circulation.._........................................................................................................ 34 11.0 Area -Wide Traffic Improvements........................................................................................... 35 11.1 Year 2012 Existing Plus Project Recommended Improvements .... .... ....... ......... ....... ...... ... 35 11.2 Year 2014 Plus Project Traffic Conditions......................................................................... 35 11.3 Year 2034 Plus Project Traffic Conditions......................................................................... 35 12.0 Congestion Management Program Compliance Assessment ................................................ 36 12.1 Traffic Impact Review .......... ............................. ................................... ......... .... ........ .... ..... 36 12.1.1 Freeways.....................................................................................................................36 12.1.2 Intersections................................................................................................................ 36 13.0 Summary Of Findings And Conclusions................................................................................ 37 APPENDICES APPENDIX A. Scope of Work and Existing Traffic Count Data B. ICU Level of Service Calculation Worksheets C. HCM Level of Service Calculation Worksheets D. Business Park Trip Generation Worksheets LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engif OE II LLG Ref. 2-12-3332 Brea Canyon Business Center Projeot, Diamond Bar s<I m LLG Ref. 2-12-3332 LIN ScoTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers III Brea Canyon Business Center Project, Diamond Bar LIST OF FIGURES FOLLOWING PAGE SECTION-FIGURE# 2 1-1 Vicinity Map....................................................................................._........_....__............ 3 2-1 Existing Aerial Photograph................................. h 2-2 Preliminary Site Plan........................................................................................................ 3 3-1 Existing Roadway Conditions and Intersection Controls .............. .......4 3-2 Existing AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes. 5 3-3 Existing PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.. ............... ......... 5 5-1 Project Traffic Distribution Pattern ................ ......... ........... ........ ....... .......... ..... ..... ..... ..13 5.2 AM Peak Hour Project Traffic Volumes .....................................................................13 5-3 PM Peak Hour Project Traffic Volumes ...:..... ............................................................13 5-4 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes...............................................14 5-5 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes...............................................14 6-1 Location of Cumulative Projects........................................................16 6-2 Year 2014 AM Peak Hour Cumulative Traffic Volumes............................................18 6-3 Year 2014 PM Peak Hour Cumulative Traffic Volumes............................................18 6-4 Year 2014 AM Peak Hour Cumulative Traffic Volumes With Project......................18 6-5 Year 2014 PM Peak Hour Cumulative Traffic Volumes With Project ......................18 6-6 Year 2034 AM Peak Hour Cumulative Traffic Volumes ......................... ...................18 6.7 Year 2034 PM Peak Hour Cumulative Traffic Volumes.................................. .....18 6-8 Year 2034 AM Peak Hour Cumulative Traffic Volumes With Project... .. ... . . ..... 19 6_9 year 2034 PM Peak Hour Cumulative Traffic Volumes With Project .............. .......18 10-1 SU-30 Inbound Truck Turning Analysis.......... ...... ..... ........................._ ..................34 10-2 SU-30 Outbound Truck Turning Analysis.................................................................... 34 10-3 Fire Truck Inbound Turning Analyses............................................................................34 10-4 Fire Truck Outbound Turning Analysis ........... _.......................................................... 34 LLG Ref. 2-12-3332 LIN ScoTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers III Brea Canyon Business Center Project, Diamond Bar LIST OF TABLES LLGKef. 2-12-3332 LINSCOTf, LAW & GREENSPAN, en9l0eeB N Brea Canyon Business Center Project, lliamond Bar h_30f1llI Imn Gu, .I L AL1 sd .. V.in R,l1116 L "IPl, '!Il; 111 ix PAGE SECTION -TABLE # 3-1 Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections ....... ._..... .:_.................... 3-2 Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections ................................ ................8 3-3 Existing Peak Hour Levels of Service ................. ........ ..._................ ......... ......... .... .... 9 5-1 Project Traffic Generation Forecast ....... ...... ............. .................. ..... .... ................. - 12 5-2 Project Directional Distribution Pattern .............................................................. ...........13 6-1 Location and Description of Cumulative Projects- ............ ......................................... . 16 6-2 Cumulative Protects Traffic Generation ......................... .....................................17 8_1 Year 2012 Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analysis .... ....._.... ... ..... . .........................21 8.2 Year 2014 Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analysis .............................................. 23 8-3 Year 2034 Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analysis .................................................. 25 9-1 Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections ....................... ............................. 27 9-2 Year 2012 Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analysis - Caltrans . ......... ......................28 9-3 Year 2014 Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analysis - Caltrans ......... ......... ................30 9-4 Year 2034 Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analysis - Caltrans..................................31 1.0-1 Project Driveway Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analysis.....................................33 LLGKef. 2-12-3332 LINSCOTf, LAW & GREENSPAN, en9l0eeB N Brea Canyon Business Center Project, lliamond Bar h_30f1llI Imn Gu, .I L AL1 sd .. V.in R,l1116 L "IPl, '!Il; 111 ix REVISED TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER PROJECT Diamond Bar, California March 26, 2013 1.0 INTRODUCTION This Traffic Impact Analysis addresses the potential traffic impacts associated with the proposed Brea Canyon Business Center Project (hereinafter referred to as Project) in the City of Diamond Bar, California. The project site is a rectangular -shared 2.68 -acre vacant parcel of land that is located on the northeast comer of Washington Street and Brea Canyon Road This report documents the findings of a traffic impact analysis conducted by Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) to determine the potential impacts associated with the proposed Project. The traffic analysis evaluates the existing operating conditions at five (5) key study intersections within the project vicinity, estimates the trip generation potential of the proposed Project, and superimposes the project -related traffic volumes on the circulation system as it currently exists. In addition, the analysis forecasts future near-term and long-term operating conditions with and without the Project, and where necessary, identifies appropriate intersection improvements/ mitigation measures. The Project site has been visited and an inventory of adjacent area roadways and intersections was performed. Existing peak hour traffic information has been collected at five (5) locations on a "typical' weekday for use in the preparation of intersection level of service calculations. Information concerning cumulative projects (planned and/or approved) in the vicinity of the Project has been researched at the City of Diamond Bar, City of Walnut, City of Pomona, City of Industry and County of Los Angeles. Based on our research, eight (8) planned projects were considered in the cumulative traffic analysis for this Project. The Scope of Work for this Project was coordinated with City staff and satisfies the City of Diamond Bar requirements as outlined in the Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines (Revised October 2009) and is consistent with the current Congestion Management Program (CMI') for Los Angeles County and the State of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies. Appendix A contains a copy of the Scope of Work that was approved by the City of Diamond Bar. 1 LLG Ref. 2-12-3332 LINsco7, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers Brea Canyon Bram-ss Center Project, Diamond Bar 1.1 Study Area The five (5) key study intersections selected for evaluation in this report provide both regional and local access to the study area. The study locations were identified using the City's -16 trip threshold criteria" and discussions with City staff. In addition, an assessment of the project driveway has been prepared. They consist of the following: 1. Brea Canyon Road at Currier Road 2. Brea Canyon Road at Washington Street 3. Brea Canyon Road at Lycoming Street 4. Brea Canyon Road at SR -60 WB Ramps 5. SR -60 EB Ramps at Golden Springs Drive Figure 1-1 presents a Vicinity Map, which illustrates the general location of the Project and depicts the study locations and surrounding street system. Level of Service (LOS) calculations for the AM and PM peak hours at these three study intersections were performed to evaluate the future potential traffic impacts associated with anticipated area growth, related projects, and the proposed Project. 1.2 Study Scope Included in this traffic and parking analysis are: • Existing traffic counts, • Estimated project traffic generation/distribution/assignment, • Estimated cumulative project traffic generation/distribution/assignment, • AM and PM peak hour capacity analyses for existing conditions (Year 2012) and existing plus project conditions, • AM and PM peak hour capacity analyses for future (Year 2014 & 2034) conditions without and with project traffic, • Caltrans Analysis • Area -Wide Traffic Improvements, and • Congestion Management Program Compliance Assessment 2 LLG W. 2-12-3332 LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers Brea Canyon Business Center Pmjeot, Diamond Bar '3i0U i i f L, o 'aku P � G�r.INy i 4—Z riled [ 1, -1 Joc SOURCE: THOMAS BROS. KEY FIGURE Z-Z s ® = STUDY INTERSECTION (TNO SCALEPROJECT SITE = VICINITY MAP BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER PROJECT, DIAMOND BAR 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project site is a rectangular -shared 2.68 -acre vacant parcel of land that is located at 650 Brea Canyon Road. The subject property is located on the northeast comer of Washington Street and Brea Canyon Road in the City of Diamond Bar. The site is currently developed with a surface parking lot and is located adjacent to a 20,571 square -feet (SF) industrial building with surface parking that is now occupied with a mixture of warehouse/office space as now allowed under its current approvals and zoning. The existing industrial building contains eight (8) suites ranging in size from approximately 1,400 SF to 3,500 SF. Based on information provided by the project applicant, the current mix of "business park" uses consists of Carpet Wholesaler, CPA firm and Accounting Office, Structural Engineering Firm, Ethnic Education, Medical Equipment, Textile Wholesaler, Engineering and a Vacant Unit. Figure 2-1 is an aerial of the proposed Project site, including the existing adjacent industrial building. The proposed Project includes the development of a two-story building consisting of 18,351 square - feet (SF) of office use and 3,443 SF of medical office use for a total of 21,794 SF. Project access to the subject property is now provided via a "full access" driveway on Washington Street. The Project is expected to be completed by late 2013/early 2014. Figures 2-2 illustrates the proposed site plan for the Project. 3 LLG Ref. 2-12-3332 LIN SCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers Brea Canyon Business Center Project, Diamond Bar t lireii; L -mn 14w -!k. 1 3 ....nil z�L�u�in i\3-Lvl; doc - ,olm5o cloz—¢—co os�eoso dm eMvz—zazccc\6"v\wq puowo�p,aweo ssxv!cnq uoavo oa,q — zcccnz\ooceV� a j <_� y JAVR3AilA �AIIISI%3 B 1 Al a\ �? :v, 4 \a � � • a I a 4zC OCQ I c avm NN a V3tlH- Q w m 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 3.1 Regional Access The Orange Freeway (State Route 57) and the Pomona Freeway (State Route 60) provide regional access to the City of Diamond Bar. The two freeways intersect one another in the northwest quadrant of the City. Primary access to the Project site is provided via the Golden Springs Drive/Brea Canyon Road/SR-60 Freeway Interchange. The local street network within the City of Diamond Bar that services the project includes Valley Boulevard, Currier Road, Brea Canyon Road, Washington Street, Lycoming Street and Golden Springs Drive. The following discussion provides a brief synopsis of these key area streets. The descriptions are based on an inventory of existing roadway conditions. Valley Boulevard is a five-lane, divided roadway located north of the project site and is oriented in the east-west direction. The posted speed limit on Valley Boulevard within the vicinity of the project site is 45 mph. On-street parking is not permitted along this roadway. Currier Road is a four-lane, divided roadway located north of the project site and is oriented in the east-west direction. This roadway provides a direct connection between Brea Canyon Road and Lemon Avenue. The posted speed limit on Currier Road is 40 mph. On-street parking is not permitted along this roadway. Brea Canyon Road is generally a four-lane, divided roadway located west of the project site and is oriented in the northeast-southwest direction. The posted speed limit on Brea Canyon Road is ranges from 40 - 50 miles per hour (mph) in the vicinity of the project. On-street parking is not permitted along this roadway in the vicinity of the project. Traffic signals control the study intersections of Brea Canyon Road at Currier Road, Washington Street, Lycoming Street, and SR-60 Westbound Ramps. Washington Street is a four-lane, divided roadway located south of the project site and is oriented in the east-west direction. The posted speed limit on Washington Street east of the project site is 35 mph. On-street parking is permitted along this roadway. Lycoming Street is a two-lane, undivided roadway located south of the project site and is oriented in the east-west direction. The posted speed limit on Lycoming Street is 35 mph west of Brea Canyon Road in the vicinity of the project. On-street parking is permitted along this roadway. Golden Springs Drive is a four-lane, divided roadway located south of the project site and is oriented in the east-west direction. The posted speed limit on Golden Springs Drive is 40 mph. Traffic signals control the study intersections of Golden Springs Drive at SR-60 EB Ramps. Figure 3-1 presents an inventory. of the existing roadway conditions for the arterials and intersections evaluated in this report. The number of travel lanes and intersection controls for the key area intersections are identified. Lmsco ,LAW& GREENSPAN, engineers 4 LLGRef. 2-12-3332 Brea Canyon Business Center Project, Diamond Bar -OG_I3313 ,vi9 1'0,7Do =fw=6.P�.r3el KEY �— =APPROACH WJE ASSIGNMENT FIGURE 3 -1 1 • - TRAFFIC SIGNAL.— STOP 9GN P = PARKING, NP = NO PARKING U = UNDMDED, 0 = DIVIDED 2 = NUM6ER OF TRAVEL LANES EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS N (XX)= POSTED SPEED LIMIT (MPH) OL= RIGHT TURN OVERLAP AND INTERSECTION CONTROLS PROJECT SITE BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER PROJECT, DIAMOND BAR �P 7, 0 ALF \ 3 PHASE SIGNAL 6 PHASE / SIGNAL E/W SPLIT 2Q / � / e r "0 4o CURRIER r� RD NP NP - 9 40) WASHINGTON ST 41) (35) x TG W n a "' ST \ \ (35) p LYCOMING \ / 2U P s 3 PHASE SIGNAL 5 PHASE SIGNAL E � 6 PHASE SIGNAL H � — — �N/S SPLIT - i KEY �— =APPROACH WJE ASSIGNMENT FIGURE 3 -1 1 • - TRAFFIC SIGNAL.— STOP 9GN P = PARKING, NP = NO PARKING U = UNDMDED, 0 = DIVIDED 2 = NUM6ER OF TRAVEL LANES EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS N (XX)= POSTED SPEED LIMIT (MPH) OL= RIGHT TURN OVERLAP AND INTERSECTION CONTROLS PROJECT SITE BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER PROJECT, DIAMOND BAR 3.2 Existing Traffic Volumes Manual counts of vehicular turning movements were conducted at the five study locations during the weekday morning and evening peak commuter periods to determine the AM peak hour and PM peak hour traffic volumes. The traffic counts of the three study intersections were conducted in June and October of 2012 and February 2013 by Transportation Studies, Inc and Pacific Traffic Data Services. Figures 3-2 and 3-3 depict the existing AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes at the key study intersections, respectively. Appendix A contains the existing intersection turning movement traffic count data. 3.3 Existing Intersection Conditions 3.3.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Method of Analysis . In conformance with the City of Diamond Bar and LA County CMP requirements, existing AM and PM peak hour operating conditions for the key signalized study intersections were evaluated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) method. The ICU technique is intended for signalized intersection analysis and estimates the volume to capacity (V/C) relationship for an intersection based on the individual V/C ratios for key conflicting traffic movements. The ICU numerical value represents the percent signal (green) time, and thus capacity, required by existing and/or future traffic. It should be noted that the ICU methodology assumes uniform traffic distribution per intersection approach lane and optimal signal timing. The ICU calculations use a lane capacity of 1,600 vehicles per hour (vph) for left -tum, through, and right -turn lanes, and dual left turn capacity of 2,880 vph. A clearance adjustment factor of 0.10 (10%) was added to each Level of Service calculation. The ICU value translates to a Level of Service (LOS) estimate, which is a relative measure of the intersection performance. The six qualitative categories of Level of Service have been defined along with the corresponding ICU value range and are shown in Table 3-1. The ICU value is the sum of the critical volume to capacity ratios at an intersection; it is not intended to be indicative of the LOS of each of the individual turning movements. According to the City of Diamond Bar, LOS D is the minimum acceptable service level that should be maintained during the peak commute hours. Consistent with this standard, the City of Diamond Bar's General Plan and Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines (Revised October 2009) specifies LOS D as the minimum acceptable service level at intersections. LiNscoii, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 5 LLGRef. 2-12-3332 BreaCanyon Business Center Aroject, Diamond Bar Rap.-1� \._3UG_ti3l ,'n( ameq D'on„W l�5_i R cc .,.eaC 6 .�'�1t 32Yuu'ou KEY FIGURE 3-2 PROJECT SITE N EXISTING AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER PROJECT, DIAMOND BAR �Z / in`105\ 81 \ 5J�f I \ aJl}�l / \ 0 \ / y CURRIER RD / WASHINGTON ST 246 c^ w m LYCOMING ST \ \ E E 4 �....... c� / 6} i 17-1 2'� P� cp / N � _ f a i KEY FIGURE 3-2 PROJECT SITE N EXISTING AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER PROJECT, DIAMOND BAR 29 48 \ 0- 299--,m o / /\ \ 0 -ti o 0 / NGTON ST / i YMMING ST \ am KEY FIGURE 3-3 E5 - PROJECT SITE N EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER PROJECT, DIAMOND BAR TABLE 3.1 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS' - ServiceIntersection Capacity Le' of Service Description Utilization Value (V/C) EXCELLENT. No vehicle waits longer 5 0.600 than one red light, and no approach phase is fully used. VERY GOOD. An occasional approach MB phase is fully utilized; many drivers begin 0.601 — 0.700 to feel somewhat restricted within groups of vehicles. GOOD. Occasionally drivers may have to wait through more than one red light; 0.701 — 0.800 backups may develop behind turning vehicles. PAIR. Delays may he substantial during portions of the rush hours, but enough D 0.801 — 0.900 lower volume periods occur to permit clearing of developing lines, preventing excessive backups. POOR. Represents the most vehicles intersection approaches can accommodate; E 0.901 — 1.000 may be long lines of waiting vehicles through several signal cycles. FAILURE. Backups from nearby locations or on cross streets may restrict or prevent movement of vehicles out of the F > 1.000 intersection approaches. Potentially very long delays with continuously increasing queue lengths. I SouroetT,,wporasrwn Res ...ch Board Crmulor212-interim Afnt reals on Highway Capacig� LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 6 LLG Ref. 242-3332 Brea Canyon Business Center Project, Diamond Bar Y�395]L.t l LiaC-11 l��m - .'usr.D uiv-Re,¢-,i R .iyrc u�.� 1 -ILL.2".] 3 3.3.2 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Method of Analysis (Unsignalized intersections) The 2000 HCM unsignalized methodology was utilized in the analysis of stop -controlled intersections. For all -way stop -controlled intersections, this methodology estimates the average control delay for each of the subject movements and determines the level of service for each movement. The overall average control delay measured in seconds per vehicle, and level of service is then calculated for the entire intersection. The HCM control delay value translates to a Level of Service (LOS) estimate, which is a relative measure of the intersection performance. For one-way and two-way stop -controlled (minor street stop -controlled) intersections, this methodology estimates the worst side street delay, measured in seconds per vehicle and determines the level of service for that approach. The HCM delay value translates to a Level of Service (LOS) estimate, which is a relative measure of the intersection performance. The six qualitative categories of Level of Service have been defined along with the corresponding HCM control delay value range, as shown in Table 3-2. 3.4 Existing Level of Service Results Table 3-3 summarizes the existing peak hour service level calculations for the five key study intersections based on existing traffic volumes presented in Figures 3-2 and 3-3, current street geometry, and intersection traffic control. As shown, all of the five key intersections currently operate at satisfactory levels of service (i.e., LOS D or better) during the AM and PM peak hours. Appendix B contains the ICU/Delay/LOS calculation worksheets for the key signalized study intersections. LINSOOTT LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 7 LLG Ref. 2-12-3332 Brea Canyon Business CenterProject, Diamond Bar 31El-1B 1 Fe. , '-r n 1 E " 1n'. i R. n "n",l !nx'11B M. TABLE 3.2 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level of Service Highway Capacity Manual (LOS) Delay Value (seclveh) Level of Service Description A < 10.0 Little or no delay B > 10.0 and <_ 15.0 Short traffic delays C > 15.0 and < 25.0 Average traffic delays D > 25.0 and!-, 35.0 Long traffic delays B > 35.0 and <_ 50.0 Very long traffic delays F > 50.0 Severe congestion 2 $Dome: Hfghmal, Cap,,rt ,Manua12000, Chapter 17 (Onsignalized hiterseelions). uNSCorr, LAW $ GREEN9PAN, engineers 8 LLG Re£ 2-12-3332 Brea Canyon Business Center Project, Diamond Bar u,D ''�d 0u IF),I.t3 I1'%''U"' -T.i'_6-l'I, TABLE 3.3 EXISTING PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICES Key Intersections Time period Jurisdiction Control Type ICU LOS Brea Canyon Road at AM Industry 3� Traffic 0.511 A 1. Currier Road PM Signal 0.738 C Brea Canyon Road at AM Diamond Bar 60 Traffic 0.438 A 2. Washington Street PM Signal 0.421 A Brea Canyon Road at AM Diamond Bar S 7 Traffic 0.764 C 3. Lycoming Street PM Signal 0.831 D Brea Canyon Road at AM Diamond Bar/ 3G3Traffic 0.625 B 4. SR -60 WB Ramps PM Caltrans Signal 0.661 B Golden Springs Drive at AM Diamond Bar/ 60 Traffic 0.695 B 5. SR -60 EB Ramps PM Caltrans Signal 0.767 C Notes: Bold ICU/LOS values indicate adverse service levels based on City LOS standards. 3AppendlsB contains the ICUIMIYy LOS worksheets for key stud}' intersections 9 LLGRef. 2-12-3332 LINSCOTT, LAW &GREENSPAN, EOgInEers Brea Canyon Business Center Project, Diamond Bar i30PCC3 I iCiu:}eir vrFnler-D e� Itu'-Reard r ­15Ym h_�ia-:C 1 Il_314-IzJoc 4.0 TRAFFIC FORECASTING METHODOLOGY In order to estimate the traffic impact characteristics of the proposed Project, a multi -step process has been utilized. The first step is traffic generation, which estimates the total arriving and departing traffic on a peak hour and daily basis. The traffic generation potential is forecast by applying the appropriate vehicle trip generation equations or rates to the project development tabulation. The second step of the forecasting process is traffic distribution, which identifies the origins and destinations of inbound and outbound project traffic. These origins and destinations are typically based on demographics and existing/expected future travel patterns in the study area. The third step is traffic assignment, which involves the allocation of project traffic to study area streets and intersections. Traffic assignment is typically based on minimization of travel time, which may or may not involve the shortest route, depending on prevailing operating conditions and travel speeds. Traffic distribution patterns are indicated by general percentage orientation, while traffic assignment allocates specific volume forecasts to individual roadway links and intersection turning movements throughout the study area. With the forecasting process complete and project traffic assignments developed, the impact of the Project is isolated by comparing operational (LOS) conditions at selected key intersections using expected future traffic volumes with and without forecast project traffic. The need for site-specific and/or cumulative local area traffic improvements can then be evaluated. L1NscoTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 10 LLG Ref. 2-12-3332 Brea Canyon Business Center Project, Diamond Bar -z}OV^_t l a om A,ap_- 3 + P ­ "O .. .yC u,ATli_ lu-I Aga 5.0 PROJECT TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS 5.1 Project Traffic Generation Traffic generation is expressed in vehicle trip ends, defined as one-way vehicular movements, either entering or exiting the generating land use. Generation factors and equations used in the traffic forecasting procedure can be found in the 9f' Edition of Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) [Washington, D.C., 2012]. Table 5-1 summarizes the trip generation rates used in forecasting the vehicular trips generated by the proposed Project and presents the forecast daily and peak hour project traffic volumes for a "typical" weekday. The trip generation potential for the proposed Project was forecast using ITE Land Use Code 710: General Office Building and ITE Land Use Code 720: Medical -Dental Office Building. As shown in Table 5-1, the proposed Project is forecast to generate 326 daily trips, with 37 trips (32 inbound, 5 outbound) produced in the AM peak hour and 39 trips (8 inbound, 31 outbound) produced in the PM peak hour on a "typical' weekday. 5.2 Project Traffic Distribution and Assignment The general, directional traffic distribution pattern for the proposed Project is presented in Table 5-2. Project traffic volumes both entering and exiting the site have been distributed and assigned to the adjacent street system based on the following considerations: • location of site access points in relation to the surrounding street system, • location of parking areas, and ingress/egress availability at the parking areas, • the site's proximity to major traffic carriers and regional access routes, • physical characteristics of the circulation system such as lane channelization and presence of traffic signals that affect travel patterns, • presence of traffic congestion in the surrounding vicinity, and • input from City staff. Based upon these considerations, the Project traffic distribution pattern at the key study intersections are presented on Figure 5-1. The anticipated AM and PM peak hour Project volumes associated with the proposed Project are presented in Figures 5-2 and 5-3, respectively. The traffic volume assignments presented in Figures 5-2 and 5-3 reflect the traffic distribution characteristics shown in Figure 5-1 and the Project traffic generation forecast presented in Table 5-1. LINSCOTT, LAW &GREEN SPAN, engneel t LLG Ref. 2-12-3332 Brea Canyon Business Center Project, Diamond Bar �Rr­[n 11,¢.11- a Source: Trip Generation, 9m Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, (II'E) [Washington, D.C. (20)2)]. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 12 LLG Ref. 2-12-3332 Brea Canyon Business Center Project, Diamond Bar .8)0611 �a Cd Y.�L, JurteF_D �Pi'.:.ey' L,, —d Hrc R P�duaar r TLA33643 Jne TABLE 5.1 PROJECT TRAFFIC GENERATION FORECAST" ]TE Land Use Code / Project Description Daily AM Peak Hour 2 -Way Enter Exit Total PM Peak Hour Enter Exit Total Trip Generation Rates: 710: General Office Building 11.03 1.37 0.19 1.56 0.25 1.24 1.49 (TE/1000 SF) 720: Medical -Dental Office Building 36.13 1.89 250 2.39 1.00 2.57 3.57 (TE/1000 SF) Project Trip Generation Forecast: • General Office (18,351 SF) 202 26 3 29 5 22 27 • Medical Office (3,443 SF) 124 6 2 8 3 9 12 Total Brea Canyon Office Project 326 32 5 37 8 31 39 Trip Generation Forecast Notes: TE/1000 SF= Trip end per 1000 SF of development a Source: Trip Generation, 9m Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, (II'E) [Washington, D.C. (20)2)]. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 12 LLG Ref. 2-12-3332 Brea Canyon Business Center Project, Diamond Bar .8)0611 �a Cd Y.�L, JurteF_D �Pi'.:.ey' L,, —d Hrc R P�duaar r TLA33643 Jne TABLE 5.2 PROJECT DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION PATTERN Distribution Percentage Orientation/Direction 15% To/from the east via SR-57/SR-60 Freeway 20% To/from the west via SR -60 Freeway 15% To/from the south via SR -57 Freeway 20% To/from the northeast via Valley Blvd to Grand Avenue 10% To/from the northwest via Currier Road to Lemon Avenue 10% To/from southeast via Brea Canyon Road to Grand Avenue 5% To/from the southwest via Lycoming Road to Lemon Avenue 5% To/from the south via Brea Canyon Road 100% Total LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 13 LLG Ref. 2-12-3332 Brea Canyon Business Center Project, Diamond Bar ent�'_ L':_d LvjRrnio,3 B. etl30,[ a .z C -E, TIA •ll111e 9 / on X307. I al b 707 / N .50 / a 71 WASHINGTON ST LYCOMING STS / o o KEY a-- = INBOUND PERCENTAGE FIGURE 5-1 -- = OUTBOUND PERCENTAGE = PROJECT SITE (tNO SCALE PROJECT DISTRIBUTION PATTERN BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER PROJECT, DIAMOND BAR KEY FIGURE 5-2 PROJECT SITE N AM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER PROJECT, DIAMOND BAR G,p 92 O ALF \ 4 0:' } � 1 \ / 1 / Q N \ l j 32J I \ / \ 0-- / CURRIER RD { � WASHINGTON ST / / o J o ST \ LYCOMING o °� oo KEY FIGURE 5-2 PROJECT SITE N AM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER PROJECT, DIAMOND BAR KEY PROJECT SITE FIGURE 5-3 N PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER PROJECT, DIAMOND BAR c� 0 9LF \ 22 \ o,�} 1 \ 0 1}r1 8J CURRIER RD WASHINGTON ST LYCOMING ST \ / n KEY PROJECT SITE FIGURE 5-3 N PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER PROJECT, DIAMOND BAR 5.3 Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions The existing plus project traffic conditions have been generated based upon existing conditions and the estimated project traffic. These forecast traffic conditions have been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines, which require that the potential impacts of a Project be evaluated upon the circulation system as it currently exists. This traffic volume scenario and the related intersection capacity analyses will identify the roadway improvements necessary to mitigate the direct traffic impacts of the Project, if any. Figures 5-4 and 5-5 present projected AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes at the five key study intersections with the addition of the trips generated by the proposed Project to existing traffic volumes, respectively. LIN SCOTT, IAW & GREENSPAN, engmers 14 LLG Ref. 2-12-3332 Brea Canyon Business Center Project, Diamond Bar _59UCI::Y I 2.11 m`Rx1-11 Bye, � H 161, Lh, KEY FIGURE 5-4 t ® EE - PROJECT SITE N EXISTING PLUS PROJECT AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER PROJECT, DIAMOND BAR v2 0 107\ / 85 Ji I �1 \ J1}rl 75� 0- / 0 Z �p J � / / I 581~ / CURRIER RD WASHINGTON ST / x'106 LYCOMING ST \ \ IDS. / 152 i KEY FIGURE 5-4 t ® EE - PROJECT SITE N EXISTING PLUS PROJECT AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER PROJECT, DIAMOND BAR KEY FIGURE 5-5 PROJECT SITE N EXISTING PLUS PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER PROJECT, DIAMOND BAR �2 0 �r70 30— f 300-y ro iz- \ �0\\ e 123- / CURRIER RD WASHINGTON ST % 9 a LYCOMING ST \ \ \ ,r 71 9p9 �w n i KEY FIGURE 5-5 PROJECT SITE N EXISTING PLUS PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER PROJECT, DIAMOND BAR 6.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 6.1 Ambient Traffic For the horizon year, background traffic growth estimates have been calculated using an ambient growth factor. The ambient traffic growth factor is intended to include unknown and future related projects in the study area, as well as account for regular growth in traffic volumes due to the development of projects outside the study area. Background traffic in the study area has been estimated to increase at a rate of approximately 1% per year in the near term. For the Year 2014, the existing (Year 2012) traffic volumes were increased by 2% to reflect area -wide regional growth in traffic. 6.2 Cumulative Projects Traffic Characteristics In order to make a realistic estimate of future on -street conditions prior to implementation of the proposed Project, the status of other known development projects (cumulative projects) within a two-mile radius of the proposed project has been researched at the City of Diamond Bar, City of Walnut, City of Pomona, City of Industry and County of Los Angeles in November 2012- With this information, the potential impact of the proposed Project can be evaluated within the context of the cumulative impact of all ongoing development. Based on our research, there are eight cumulative projects within the vicinity of the project. These cumulative projects have either been built, but not yet fully occupied, or are being processed for approval. These eight related projects have been included as part of the cumulative background setting. It should be noted that given the trip generation potential of the Industry Business Center (IBC), identified as cumulative project no. 4, is greater than that of the IBC/NFL Stadium alternative', the IBC project was considered in the cumulative analysis under long-term conditions. Table 6-1 provides a brief description for each of the eight related projects. Figure 6-1 graphically illustrates the location of the eight related projects. These related projects are expected to generate vehicular traffic, which may affect the operating conditions of the key study intersections. Table 6-2 summarizes the trip generation potential for all eight cumulative projects on a daily and peak hour basis for a typical weekday. As shown, the cumulative projects are expected to generate 87,104 daily trips, with 6,356 trips (5,003 inbound, 1,353 outbound) anticipated during the AM peak hour and 8,891 trips (2,990 inbound, 5,901 outbound) produced during the PM peak hour. Table 6-2 identifies that all of the eight cumulative projects are anticipated to be operational sometime after near term -year 2014 and before long-term Year 2034. 5 Son, Trafflo lnipac[Analysisfor Industry Business Center SEER prepared by LLG Engineers, dated August 2008. t5 LLG Ref. 2-12-3332 LINscoTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineeB Brea Canyon Business Center Project, Diamond Bar Ew C l'..3-22-1BA�c r m.O,N � xCrvnre t uro n i 3--i , 11,-,d P C �^� TABLE 6.1 LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF CUMULATIVE PROJECTS No. Cumulative Project Jurisdiction Location/Address Description 1. Commercial Retail Walnut Lemon Avenue at Valley 5-,965 SF retail Boulevard 2 W VUSD Site D Mixed -Use Diamond Bar Diamond Bar Boulevard East of 200 DU condommaim, Project Brea Canyon Road 3 Kaiser Permanente Medical Diamond Bar 1336 S. Bridgegate Drive 33,590 SF medical Office Building — Phase II office 4,779,000 SF mixed- 4. Industry Business Center Industry Grand Avenue north of SR -60 use SW comer of Grand Avenue and 125,000 SF industrial 5. Industria] Park Industry Baker Parkway park 198,000 SF industrial 6. industry East — Area A-2 Industry - South side of Garcia Drive, east Park, 15,000 SF Fire of Grand Avenue Station West of Grand Avenue, south of 189,000 SF shopping 7. Industry East — Area A-3 Industry Valley Boulevard center West of Grand Avenue, south of 99,000 SF shopping 8. Industry East —Area A-4 Industry, Valley Boulevard center LMSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 16 LLG Ref. 2-12-3332 Brea Canyon Business Center Project, Diamond Bar -aC^I33� cnhT�6o I hl�C,11 r. ,.c. 3u 6�u2`b3 Id 3'oa Cv.n 6 .-I.I _1_vd-- �ol!n6o ZLOZ-4L—ll 95 OZ 4L dm 6Mp l-91Z££f\6np\coq puowmp Veiueo s....... uo6uoo .-q f y € ifl a.r�re� bra gCu`=+8"ff3a�.�''c� Ji7 �S.4:1. F O�1'bj'Q� il[4fJ `�/ua°'' "trro}4y �j•z ala- g rz. 1 Ate'' a�j��' tR �a AA 4,1J Np17 rd�Fi III�4 N \Ih 1 $r!dri��1=�.� J �� Wa aL1IIf _ — .cam'` c u S 1F ��t o w m AV SINBNldFA iy ow ¢<¢ _ alamaat jj aL�S'ys yyj�,%, +\ wi Y< X w w Y W Z Z K rco<N <NcnN a,o \. h� s'�•PC ct' ',� `� QAwawww WWN JWW U�Na w p W o w r w \ J [%E1tlLlQ _ � � w N Ln rn In N - d� '- i •--�� k9G J1 R au x zZZZZ le FNM 46mhm 'r� c/ rD Hr W Of Ea < m U nG7'a � 00 a a [G, o F F- 0 U EW 0 O a W U~ z w Gy U 0 N N Z w Z dm UZ 00 Z Q U J a �d TABLE 6.2 Ci MMI n envr PPO.IFCTS TRAFFIC GENERATION FORECAST Cumulative Project Daily PeaikHour PMPeakHour Tn Out Total Tn Out Total Nu. Description Two-WayF7AM INCLUDEDIN PEAR 2034 CE3tIULATIVE CONDITIONS 1. Commercial Retail 256 4 2 6 11 11 22 2. WVUSD Site D Project 1,162 14 74 88 _. 70 34 104 3. Kaiser MOB Phase 11 1,214 63 17 80 34 86 120 4. Industry Business Center 6 67,993 4,460 1,086 5,546 2,362 4,965 7,327 5. Industrial Park 1,368 100 22 122 29 109 138 6. Industry East — Area A-27 2,040 180 36 216 57 234 291 7. Industry East — Area A-3° 9,245 126 80 206 309 335 644 8. Industry East —Area A-47 3,826 56 36 92 118 127 245 TOTAL CUMULATIVE 87,104 5,003 1,353 6,356 2,990 5,901 8,891 PROJECT TRIPS 6 Source: Traffic lmpactShFdyforlndusby Business Center prepared by LLG Engineers, dated March2004. LIN SCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, enginseM 17 LLG Ref. 2-12-3332 Brea Canyon Business Center Projcot, Diamond Bar i.uavo.ts- r.,. . —" u , ;-13a,, 6.3 Year 2034 Traffic Conditions Year 2034 cumulative traffic volume forecasts utilized in this report are developed based on the finding presented in the traffic analysis for Industry General Plan Update EIR, dated November 2011 prepared by LLG Engineers. Future buildout traffic conditions take into account shifts in traffic to reflect the construction of a new 1/4 diamond interchange (excludes westbound off -ramp) at the SR-60/Lemon Avenue Interchange and removal of the SR -60 eastbound ramps at Golden Springs Drive (Brea Canyon Road). Specifically, a westbound on-ramp and eastbound on- and off - ramps will be added at Lemon Avenue and both will be signalized intersections. In conjunction with the construction of the SR-60/Lemon Avenue Interchange, the existing SR -60 eastbound on- and off - ramps at Golden Springs Drive (Study Intersection 5) will be removed/eliminated. 6.4 Year 2014 and Year 2034 Traffic Volumes 6.4.1 Year 2014 Traffic Volumes Figures 6-2 and 6-3 present the AM and PM peak hour cumulative traffic volumes (existing traffic + ambient growth + cumulative projects) at the five key study intersections for the Year 2014, respectively. Figures 6-4 and 6-5 illustrates Year 2014 forecast AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes, with the inclusion of the trips generated by the proposed Project, respectively. 6.4.2 Year 2034 Traffic Volumes Figures 6-6 and 6-7 present the Year 2034 AM and PM peak hour cumulative traffic volumes at the five key study intersections, respectively, except Golden Springs Drive at SR -60 EB Ramps, which is assumed to be removed with the planned construction of the SR-60/Lemon Avenue Interchange. Figures 6-8 and 6-9 illustrates Year 2034 forecast AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes, with the inclusion of the trips generated by the proposed Project, respectively. LINSCOTf, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers t $ LLG Ref. 2-12-333 2 Brea Canyon Business Center Projeot, Diamond Bar >3U001 i l 1 _.-=Cenmc-D , IL+.'htepa , .L,..d., , KEY FIGURE 6-2 PROJECT SITE YEAR 2014 AM PEAK HOUR CUMULATIVE TRAFFIC VOLUMES BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER PROJECT, DIAMOND BAR cP v2 O 9L� i 107 \ 77J m \ / CURRIER RD jWASHINGTON ST j 9 a � / cp W 9 } m LYCOMING ST10 \ g KEY FIGURE 6-2 PROJECT SITE YEAR 2014 AM PEAK HOUR CUMULATIVE TRAFFIC VOLUMES BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER PROJECT, DIAMOND BAR o ms`s \ Q�I KEY PROJECT SITE FIGURE 6-3 N YEAR 2014 PM PEAK HOUR CUMULATIVE TRAFFIC VOLUMES BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER PROJECT, DIAMOND BAR / \ N rnw> 30 \ 49 34' 1 } r - /\ 20,1 N/ / �_ / 2 / r / N WASHINGTON ST a i / LYCOMING ST \ E J/ i i KEY PROJECT SITE FIGURE 6-3 N YEAR 2014 PM PEAK HOUR CUMULATIVE TRAFFIC VOLUMES BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER PROJECT, DIAMOND BAR —y KEY FIGURE 6-4 PROJECT SITE rj YEAR 2014 AM PEAK HOUR CUMULATIVE TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH PROJECT BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER PROJECT, DIAMOND BAR 7 y- 0 X109\ �r87 �,1} ,} i� 70- \ 1 � / o / o 57--' 83— CURRIER RD - 9 .. WASHINGTON ST % J 9 a I\ l✓°off LYCOMING ST \ l 055 \ — GO r qp0 —y KEY FIGURE 6-4 PROJECT SITE rj YEAR 2014 AM PEAK HOUR CUMULATIVE TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH PROJECT BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER PROJECT, DIAMOND BAR f \ 71 39 C 71 \\ 20 0\ \ Ce / .) 79 15--j 125- ZIER RD\ ml %hiA zwWnTON ST / I YcnMING ST j KEY FIGURE 6=5 PROJECT SITE rj YEAR 2014 PM PEAK HOUR CUMULATIVE TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH PROJECT BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER PROJECT, DIAMOND BAR KEY FIGURE 6 - 6 PROJECT SITE N YEAR 2034 AM PEAK HOUR CUMULATIVE TRAFFIC VOLUMES BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER PROJECT, DIAMOND BAR 0 QEF / Mo \ /_�a x-107\ \ J i L r- 83 a5— 1 1 50-- �— \ / 1 V \ / h CURRIER RD WASHINGTON ST 9 `�Jsd i 3)R � m in — LYCOMING ST \\ 3 6 Q�y��GS O N N 0 m KEY FIGURE 6 - 6 PROJECT SITE N YEAR 2034 AM PEAK HOUR CUMULATIVE TRAFFIC VOLUMES BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER PROJECT, DIAMOND BAR v / \ I pfD\�J I1�O, ST / vrrAAIN(> ST \ KEY -- PROJECT SITE FIGURE 6-7 YEAR 2034 PM PEAK HOUR CUMULATIVE TRAFFIC VOLUMES BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER PROJECT, DIAMOND BAR KEY FIGURE 6-8 PROJECT SITE NYEAR 2034AM VOLUMES WITH PROJEPEAK HOUR CT BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER PROJECT, DIAMOND BAR 0 Lr87 } i/I 85--4 53-1 \ 83— / CURRIER RD 9 WASHINGTON ST l m \ LYCOMING ST _ E / 155 \ m /mom i 0 i KEY FIGURE 6-8 PROJECT SITE NYEAR 2034AM VOLUMES WITH PROJEPEAK HOUR CT BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER PROJECT, DIAMOND BAR KEY FIGURE 6-9 PROJECT SITE rj YEAR 2034 PM PEAK HOUR CUMULATIVE TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH PROJECT BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER PROJECT, DIAMOND BAR �P v2 0 9L� 39 71 J� }ri i66J1 } o- romm 20-1 / 0 2 \ A 7 \ / 125- / CURRIER RD 9 y .. WASHINGTON ST % 9 J LYCOMING ST \\ 15 i 0 KEY FIGURE 6-9 PROJECT SITE rj YEAR 2034 PM PEAK HOUR CUMULATIVE TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH PROJECT BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER PROJECT, DIAMOND BAR 7.0 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY The relative impact of the proposed Project during the AM peak hour and PM peak hour was evaluated based on analysis of future operating conditions at the key study intersections, without, then with, the proposed Project. The previously discussed capacity analysis procedures were utilized to investigate the future volume -to -capacity relationships and service level characteristics at each study intersection. The significance of the potential impacts of the Project at each key intersection was then evaluated using the following traffic impact criteria. 7.1 Impact Criteria and Thresholds: 7.1.1 City of Diamond Bar The significance of the potential impacts of the Project at each key intersection was then evaluated using the following criteria. The Project is considered to have a potentially significant impact if the following criteria are met: For SiP-nalized Intersections: ❑ the ICU value under "with project" conditions is 0.91 or greater (LOSE or F), and ❑ the ICU increase attributable to the project is 0.02 or greater For Unsigrlalized Intersections: Based on the HCM/LOS method of analysis, this report identifies a significant traffic impact when the Project causes a change from LOS D to LOS E or F, or the Project causes an increase in delay of 2% or more at an intersection operating LOS E or F. 7.2 Traffic Impact Analysis Scenarios The following scenarios are those for which LOS calculations have been performed: A. Existing traffic, B. Existing plus Project conditions; C. Existing plus Project conditions plus mitigation (as required), D- Existing traffic plus ambient growth to the year the project will be completed plus cumulative project traffic; E. Traffic in (D) plus proposed Project traffic; F. Traffic in (E) plus mitigation (as required); G. Long -Term (Year 2034) Future Traffic Conditions; H. Traffic in (G) plus proposed Project traffic, and I. Traffic in (II) plus mitigation (as required). LINSCOTT, LAW 8 GREENSPAN, engineers 19 LLG Ref. 2-12-3332 Brea Canyon Business Center Project, Diamond Bar z 0 u - 1 '3'�K ! m .II Ienfaq Ilio nBm .R_pnn 3`1 In .I1. e,nC D - —,CLW LA 1 21C.11 8.0 PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS 8.1 Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions Table 8-1 summarizes the peak hour LOS results at the five key study intersections for existing and existing plus project traffic conditions. The first column (1) of ICU/LOS values in Table 8-1 presents a summary of existing AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions (which were also presented in Table 3-3). The second column (2) lists existing plus project traffic conditions based on existing intersection geometry. The third column (3) shows the increase in ICU value due to the added peak hour Project trips and indicates whether the traffic associated with the Project will have a significant impact based on the LOS standards and the significance impact criteria defined in this report. The fourth column (4) indicates the forecast LOS with implementation of recommended improvements to mitigate the Project's traffic impact. 8.1.1 Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions Review of Columns 2 and 3 of Table 8-1 indicates that traffic associated with the proposed Project will not significantly impact any of the five key study intersections, when compared to the LOS standards and significant impact criteria specified in this report. The five key study intersections currently operate and are forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable service level during the AM and PM peak hours with the addition of Project generated traffic to existing traffic. 20 LLG Rei 2-12-3332 UsscoTT, LAW 8 GREENSPAN, engineers Brea Canyon Business Center Project, Diamond Bar itu'A,", i P""Id e I .A3-2o-13.,Lm \ z» z Z z= x& z= ! —t\2$ {I � Ej} . e �}) \\ . \\\\\( 8.2 Year 2014 Traffic Conditions Table 8-2 summarizes the peak hour LOS results at the five key study intersections for Year 2014 cumulative traffic conditions. As shown, column one (1) presents existing traffic operating conditions (as detailed previously). Column two (2) presents future Year 2014 cumulative traffic conditions. Column three (3) reports the forecast Year 2014 traffic conditions with the addition Project traffic. The fourth column (4) shows the increase in ICU value due to the added peak hour project trips and indicates whether the traffic associated with the Project will have a significant traffic impact based on the significance impact criteria defined in this report. The fifth column (5) indicates the forecast LOS with implementation of recommended improvements to mitigate the Project's traffic impact. 8.2.1 Year 2014 Cumulative Traffic Conditions An analysis of future (Yeas 2014) cumulative traffic conditions indicates that the addition of ambient traffic growth and cumulative projects traffic will not adversely impact any of the five key study intersections. The five key study intersections are forecast to continue to operate at acceptable levels of service during the AM and PM peak hours with the addition of ambient traffic growth and related projects traffic. 8.2.2 Year 2014 Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Conditions Review of Columns 3 and 4 of Table 8-2 indicates that traffic associated with the proposed Project will not significantly impact any of the five key study intersections, when compared to the LOS standards and significant impact criteria specified in this report. The five key study intersections are forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable LOS with the addition of project generated traffic in the Year 2014. 22 LLG Ref. 2-12-3332 LINSCoTT, LAW 8 GREENSPAN, EnglOeerS Brea Canyon Business Center Project, Diamond Bar 1 ( quer"fIA3- f 0 c y � � z z z z z z z z z z z ~u u ea�G a N L F Ur V p N vi C W �n m oo O o0 L U O y N r y .Na L U O d U d Q U a w as p U o F -I w N o .,y. T � F � C o�❑❑D i, � W 0 8.3 Year 2034 Traffic Conditions Table 8-3 summarizes the peak hour Level of Service results at the five key study intersections for Year 2034 cumulative traffic conditions. The structure of this table is similar to that of Table 8-2. As shown, column one (1) presents existing traffic operating conditions (as detailed previously). Column two (2) presents future Year 2034 cumulative traffic conditions. Column three (3) reports the forecast Year 2034 traffic conditions with the addition Project traffic. The fourth column (4) shows the increase in ICU value due to the added peak hour Project trips and indicates whether the traffic associated with the Project will have a significant traffic impact based on the significance impact criteria defined in this report. The fifth column (5) indicates the anticipated level of service with implementation of recommended improvements to mitigate adverse cumulative traffic conditions and/or achieve an acceptable LOS. B.3.1 Year 2034 Cumulative Traffic Conditions Review of column 2 of Table 8-3 shows that projected long -tern (Year 2034) cumulative traffic will not adversely impact any of the key study intersections. As noted earlier, with the planned construction of the SR-60/Lemon Avenue Interchange, the Golden Springs Drive/SR-60 EB Ramps intersection will be demolished and therefore service level projections for this key intersection are not necessary under Year 2034 cumulative traffic conditions. 8.3.2 Year 2034 Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Conditions Review of Columns 3 and 4 of Table 8-3 indicates that traffic associated with the proposed Project will not significantly impact any of the key study intersections, when compared to the LOS standards and significant impact criteria specified in this report. All key study intersections are forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable LOS with the addition of project generated traffic in the Year 2034. 24 LLG Ref. 2-12-3332 LINScoTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engMerS Brea Canyon Business Center Project, Diamond Bar � E � M i O N z z z z z z z z =' D y O O O O O O � O O O O O O o "•i C O O O O O O O O I--1 ? u O¢ U¢ Q U U as ce O i 4 rO�i u F O¢ U¢¢ U UFmp -.- O U . N .N~.. Y p en o O Q U m W W U 6 a .4 o V ' W U O O O O O O O O O O H y ro m• va '$ U q�q U 0 R] r U M U p o `� O � m � ro ro o o ro u •-. 0 W U W�z m a• P� � U 9.0 STATE OF CALIFORNIA (CALTRANS) METHODOLOGY In conformance with the current Caltrans Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies, existing and projected peak hour operating conditions at the two (2) state-controlled study intersections within the study area have been evaluated using the Highway Capacity Manual 2000 (HCM 2000 for signalized intersections) operations method of analysis. These state-controlled locations include the following two study intersections: 4. Brea Canyon Road at SR -60 WB Ramps 5. Golden Spring Drive at SR -60 EB Ramps Caltrans "endeavors to maintain a target LOS at the transition between LOS "C" and LOS "D" on State highway facilities"; it does not require that LOS "D" (shall) be maintained. However, Caltrans acknowledges that this may not always be feasible and recommends that the lead agency consult with Caltrans to determine the appropriate target LOS. According to City of Diamond Bar, LOS D is the minimum acceptable condition that should be maintained during the morning and evening peak commute hours on all City intersections. 9.1 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Method of Analysis (Signalized Intersections) Based on the HCM operations method of analysis, level of service for signalized intersections is defined in terms of control delay, which is a measure of driver discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption, and lost travel time. The delay experienced by a motorist is made up of a number of factors that relate to control, geometries, traffic, and incidents. Total delay is the difference between the travel time actually experienced and the reference travel time that would result during ideal conditions: in the absence of traffic control, in the absence of geometric delay, in the absence of any incidents, and when there are no other vehicles on the road. In Chapter 16 of the HCM, only the portion of total delay attributed to the control facility is quantified. This delay is called control delay. Control delay includes initial deceleration delay, queue move -up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. In contrast, in previous versions of the HCM (1994 and earlier), delay included only stopped delay. Specifically, LOS criteria for traffic signals are stated in terms of the average control delay per vehicle. The six qualitative categories of Level of Service that have been defined along with the corresponding HCM control delay value range for signalized intersections are shown in Table 9-1. 9.2Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions Table 9-2 summarizes the peak hour level of service results at the two state-controlled study intersections within the study area for Existing plus Project traffic conditions based on the HCM method of analysis. A review of this table indicates that both state-controlled study intersections currently operate at an acceptable LOS during the AM and PM peak hours. Further, a review of Table 9-2 indicates that traffic associated with the proposed Project will not significantly impact Brea Canyon Road at SR -60 WB Ramps and Golden Springs Drive at SR -60 EB Ramps as both are forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable LOS with the addition of Project generated traffic to existing traffic. 26 LLG Ref. 2-12-3332 LNScoTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, englneem Brea Canyon Business Center Project, Diamond Bar X21=:i s .niR -Jen-cdni H Pp�'Rsi1'- TABLE 9.1 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS (HCM METHODOLOGy)14 Level of Service (LOS) Control Delay Per Vehicle (seconds/vehicle) Level of Service Description This level of service occurs when progression is extremely favorable and most vehicles arrive A < 10.0 during the green phase. Most vehicles do not stop at all. Short cycle lengths may also contribute to low delay. This level generally occurs with good B > 10.0 and < 20.0 progression, short cycle lengths, or both. More — vehicles stop than with LOS A, causing higher levels of average delay. Average traffic delays. These higher delays may result from fair progression, longer cycle lengths, or both. Individual cycle failures may C > 20.0 and:s 35.0 begin to appear at this level. The number of vehicles stopping is significant at this level, though many still pass through the intersection without stopping. Long traffic delays. At level D, the influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from some D > 35.0 and < 55.0 combination of unfavorable progression, long — - cycle lengths, or high v/c ratios. Many vehicles stop, and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines. Individual cycle failures are - noticeable. Very long traffic delays. This level is considered by many agencies (i.e. SANBAG) to be the limit of acceptable delay. These high F > 55.0 and:s 80.0 delay values generally indicate poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high v,/c ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. Severe congestion. This level, considered to be unacceptable to most drivers, often occurs with over saturation, that is, when arrival flow rates exceed the capacity of the intersection. It may F >_ 80.0 also occur at high v/c ratios below 1.0 with many individual cycle failures. Poor - progression and long cycle lengths may also be major contributing factors to such delay levels. 14 Source: Higlnvay Capacity Mental 2000, Chapter 16 (Signalized Intmeetions). LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 27 LLG Ref. 2-123332 Brea Canyon Business Center PnSeet, Diamond.Bar 1, 0<.212!',32 - B, r 3 1 ,.:ate TABLE 9.2 YEAR 2012 PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS — CALTRANS" 15 Bold ICU/LOS vulues indioate adverse service levels bayed ort City LOS standards. LIN$COTT, LAW 8 GREEN$PAN, e09tneers 28 C [1Si,. icy, i'3 -..L ., s�iletltil _,S.Mu LLG Ref. 2-12-3332 Brea Canyon Business Center Project, Diamond Bar (2) Year 2012 (1) Existing Plus (3) 2012 Existing project Traffic Significant F4� Traffic Conditions Conditions Impact Time Period RCM LOS HCM LO5 Yes/No ey Intersections a Canyon Road at AM 25.0 C 25.1 C No Z Ramp PM 25.0 C 25.1 C No6O Golden Springs Drive at AM 27.8 C 27.8 C No 5. SR -60 EB Ramps PM 27.3 C 27.5 C No 15 Bold ICU/LOS vulues indioate adverse service levels bayed ort City LOS standards. LIN$COTT, LAW 8 GREEN$PAN, e09tneers 28 C [1Si,. icy, i'3 -..L ., s�iletltil _,S.Mu LLG Ref. 2-12-3332 Brea Canyon Business Center Project, Diamond Bar 9.3 Year 2014 Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Conditions Table 9-3 summarizes the peak hour level of service results for Brea Canyon Road at SR -60 WB Ramps and Golden Springs Drive at SR -60 EB Ramps for Year 2014 Cumulative Traffic Conditions without and with Project Traffic based on the HCM method of analysis. A review of Table 9-2 indicates both the Brea Canyon Road at SR -60 WB Ramps and Golden Springs Drive at SR -60 EB Ramps are forecast to continue to operate at LOS C during the AM peak hour and PM peak hour under Year 2014 cumulative traffic conditions without Project traffic. 9.3.1 Year 2014 Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Conditions Table 9-4 summarizes the peak hour level of service results for Brea Canyon Road at SR -60 WB Ramps for Year 2034 Cumulative Traffic Conditions without and with Project Traffic based on the RCM method of analysis. As noted earlier, with the planned construction of the SR-60/Lemon Avenue Interchange, the Golden Springs Drive/SR-60 EB Ramps intersection will be demolished and therefore service level projections for this key intersection are not necessary under Year 2034 cumulative traffic conditions. Review of Columns 3 and 4 of Table 9-4 indicates that traffic associated with the proposed Project will not significantly impact Brea Canyon Road at SR -60 WB Ramps as this key intersection is forecast to continue to operate at LOS C with the addition of project generated traffic in the Year 2034, Appendix C presents the existing plus project and Year 2014 and Year 2034 plus project HCM/LOS calculations for the two state-controlled study intersections. LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 29 LLC, Ref. 2-12-3332 Brea Canyon Business Center Project, Diamond Bar 530P3 - t21C.m 11" me ua Dl :R -13 Iti:x]Re�.il�ll..o-20- t Jia Elzlz zlz z bA it r� ro c � 0. m v Q L U U N N N N U j Q U � � � a J � SpU ,Ux N N N N Q 7 M Q C6 U � Q U 73 ri H W N, W O W U Z N V W m N N N N o E, x x Y Q W EL v q N K Q W r ro c � 0. m v );« 2!&/ 2(|° ! E3) \m 10.0 SITE ACCESS EVALUATION 10.1 Level of Service Analysis For Project Access Access to the project site will be provided via an existing full access driveway located along Washington Street which provided access to an existing industrial building. It should be noted that given the current tenant mix reflects "business park -type" uses, the existing driveway volumes have been forecasted using ITE Land Use Code 770: Business Park trips rates. As noted earlier, the existing 20,571 SF industrial building contains eight (8) suites ranging in size from approximately 1,400 SF to 3,500 SF that is now occupied by a Carpet Wholesaler, CPA firm and Accounting Office, Structural Engineering Firm, Ethnic Education, MedicalEquipment, Textile Wholesaler, Engineering and a Vacant Unit. According to the applicant, the tenant mix or uses are not expected to vary from what is now allowed under the site's current zoning. To provide a conservative assessment, the existing building is assumed to be fully occupied. Appendix D presents the ITE trip generation rates for a business park. Table 10-1 summarizes the intersection operations at the project driveway along Washington Street under near-term (Year 2014) and long-term (Year 2034) traffic conditions at completion and full occupancy of the proposed Project. The operations analysis for the project driveway is based on the Highway Capacity Manual 2000 (RCM 2000) methodology. Review of Table 9-1 shows that the treet is ecast te proposed during projectdrivewaydrive and PM peak ours forSnear-termr(Yeart2014)raandalong long -e LOS A or term (Year 2 4) better during traffic conditions. In addition, due to the relatively low level of volume along Washington Street the project driveway is expected to have a maximum queue of one (1) vehicle both entering and exiting the site. As such, project access will be adequate. Motorists entering and exiting the Project site will be able to do so comfortably, safely, and without undue congestion. Appendix B presents Year 2014 and Year 2034 level of service calculation worksheets at the project driveway. LLG Ref. 2-12-3332 LINSCOTT, LAW 8 GREENSPAN, engl i ers 32 Brea Canyon Business Cuter Project, Diamond Bar V li�f=r ._ .P.➢ R'!", V I,, l -' "C ' 11—j""; IAi TABLE 10.9 PROJECT DRIVEWAY PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS" 19 Bald ICU/LOSvalues indicate adverse service levels based on City LOS standardss/v= seconds per vehicle. - LLGRef 242-3332 LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, englneers 33 Brea Canyon Business Center Project, Diamond Bar �'30�. }i,J 6rev -o .a>C 1-_Dlc.A Bvol 1 »>li2-lisi Ib }xn Sus AetILI ..o-13.dov (1) (2) Year 2014 Year 2034 Plus Project Plus Project Traffic Conditions Traffic Conditions Time Intersection Project Driveway Period Control HCM LOS HCM LOS Project Driveway at AM One —Way 8.8 s/v A 8.8 s/v A A. Washington Street PM Stop 8.7 s/v A 8.7 s/v A 19 Bald ICU/LOSvalues indicate adverse service levels based on City LOS standardss/v= seconds per vehicle. - LLGRef 242-3332 LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, englneers 33 Brea Canyon Business Center Project, Diamond Bar �'30�. }i,J 6rev -o .a>C 1-_Dlc.A Bvol 1 »>li2-lisi Ib }xn Sus AetILI ..o-13.dov 10.2 Internal Circulation The on-site circulation layout of the propAirtoTUR1V for Project has been tested using AetoCAD �omputer Templates, developed by Jack E. Leisch & Associates, and software that simulates turning maneuvers for various types of vehicles. The internal circulation and is adequate to accommodate service/delivery trucks, layout for the Project has been reviewed 1, lo -2, trucks ks 10-3andand firet ate s (Platform lum g movement for ) that da small delivservice the pery/trashstruck land ea fire truck, respectively. An evaluation of the truck turning requirements of full-sized (WB-40 rope and WB -50) trucks indicates that accessing the site and circulating throughout the entire property would could difficult unless modifications to the parking layout of the industrial building were made (which could result in a loss of parking), the driveway was modified to provide a 40 -foot to 50 -foot "curb -return" and the existing median nose on Washington Street was shorted by up to 15 -feet. However, given the existing or future tenants of the industrial building are only likely to receive deliveries via small trucks (SU -30) similar to the proposed Project, the naccommodate modithe tutniwould not be required. ng requirement of sized (WB - 40 or WB -50) truck is not necessary and hence so To ensure adequate truck access and circulation is maintained and vehicular conflicts are minimized, it is recommended that access for full-sized (WB -40 or larger) trucks be restricted/prohibited. It ons, Covenants recommended that the project applicant on opt bitionls restriction in owneritenant will be applied t all tenants ofothelex sti g building & Restrictions (CC&R). The CC&R &R prohibition p and proposed Project. LLGRef 2-12-3332 LINSWTT,IAW &GREENSPAN, engineers 34 Brea Canyon Business Center Project, Diamond Bar 3x0.0 4&o 240.0 SU mat 96.0 Track 96.0 Lock to Loek Tme : 60 SEeenng Angle : 319 FIGURE 10-1 �scnLe: i"=s0' SU—SO INBOUND TRUCK TURNING ANALYSIS BREA CANYON BUSINESS PARK, LA HABRA 3� 45.0 0.0 SU m nee Wath :96.0 Torek 96.0 Lack to Lock 7, : 6.0 Stv nn9 A^91e :31.8 FIGURE 10-2 (tcALe 1-50' SU -30 OUTBOUND TRUCK TURNING ANALYSIS — HABRA BREA CANYON BUSINESS PARK, LA FIGURE 10-3 FIRE TRUCK INBOUND TURNING ANALYSIS BREA CANYON BUSINESS PARK, LA HABRA FIGURE 10-4 �scnu=: r=so' FIRE TRUCK OUTBOUNII TURNING ANALYSIS BREA CANYON BUSINESS PARK, LA HABRA 11.0 AREA -WIDE TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS For those intersections where future traffic volumes are expected to result in poor operating conditions, this report identifies recommended roadway improvements that change the intersection geometry to increase capacity. These capacity improvements involve roadway widening and/or re - striping to reconfigure (add lanes) to specific approaches of a key intersection. The identified improvements are expected to: mitigate the impact of area -wide deficiencies, and/or improve Levels of Service to an acceptable range. 11.1 Year 2012 Existing Plus Project Recommended Improvements The results of the intersection capacity analysis presented previously in Table 8-1 shows that the proposed Project will not significantly impact any of the five key study intersections under the "Existing Plus Project" traffic scenario. Given that there are no significant project impacts, no improvements are required under this traffic scenario. 11.2 Year 2014 Plus Project Traffic Conditions The results of the intersection capacity analyses presented previously in Table 8-2 shows that the proposed Project will not significantly impact any of the five key study intersections under the "Year 2014 Plus Project' traffic scenario. Given that there are no significant project impacts, no improvements are required under this traffic scenario. 11.3 Year 2034 Plus Project Traffic Conditions The results of the intersection capacity analyses presented previously in Table 8-3 shows that the proposed Project will not significantly impact any of the five key study intersections under the "Year 2034 Plus Project' traffic scenario. Given that there are no significant project impacts, no improvements are required under this traffic scenario. LLG Ref. 2-12-3332 LINSCOTT, LAW & GREEN$PAN, engineers 35 Brea Canyon Business Center Proiect, Diamond Bar NMM%2 I ,Iv1 Tla;- 1a.d,,.: 12.0 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT The Congestion Management Program (CMP) was created statewide as a result of Proposition 111 and has been implemented locally by the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA). The CMP for Los Angeles County requires that the traffic impact of individual development projects of potential regional significance be analyzed. A specific system of arterial roadways plus all freeways comprise the CMP system. 12.1 Traffic Impact Review As required by the current Congestion Managernent Program for Los Angeles Coung , a review has been made of designated monitoring locations on the CMP highway system for potential impact analysis. Per CMP T1A criteria, the geographic area examined in the TTA must include the following, at a minimum: • All CMP arterial monitoring intersections, including freeway on and off -ramp intersections, where the project will add 50 or more trips during either the AM or PM weekday peak hours. • Mainline freeway -monitoring stations where the project will add 150 or more trips, in either direction, during the AM or PM weekday peak hours. 12.1.1 Freeways The CMP freeway mainline monitoring stations in the vicinity of the study area are as follows: CMP Station No. 1031: SR -60 at Brea Canyon Road CMP Station No. 1032: SR -60 east of SR -57 The proposed project will not add 150 or more trips (in either direction) during the weekday AM and PM peak hours at CMP mainline freeway monitoring locations as stated in the CMP manual as the threshold for a traffic impact assessment. Therefore a CMP freeway traffic impact analysis is not required. 12.1.2 Intersections The CMP arterial intersection in the vicinity of the study area includes the intersection of Diamond Bar Boulevard at Grand Avenue. As stated earlier, the CMP guidelines require that arterial monitoring intersection locations must be examined if the proposed project will add 50 or more trips during either the AM or PM weekday peak hours (of adjacent street traffic) at CMP monitoring intersections. Based on the proposed project's trip generation potential, trip distribution and trip assignment, the added AM and PM peak hour project generated trips to the adjacent street system does not require a CMP analysis. LLG Re£ 2-12-3332 LINSCOTr, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers 36 Brea Canyon Business CenterProject, Diamond Bar i _ =—R iYu ( 1 L. M1.713� cs "'4.= l� II LUPS�nF !dtrF,A 13.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS • Project Description —The project site is a rectangular -shared 2.68 -acre vacant parcel of land that is located on the northeast comer of Washington Street and Brea Canyon Road. The proposed Project includes the development of a two-story building consisting of 18,351 square -feet (SF) of office use and 3,443 SF of medical office use for a total of 21,794 SE Access to the subject property is now provided via a "full access" driveway on Washington Street. The site is currently developed with a surface parking lot and is located adjacent to a 20,571 SF industrial building with surface parking. • Study Scope — The following intersections were selected for detailed peak hour level of service analyses under Existing (Year 2012) Traffic Conditions without and with Project Traffic, Year 2014 Cumulative Traffic Conditions without and with Project Traffic, and Year 2034 Cumulative Traffic Conditions without and with Project Traffic: 1. Brea Canyon Road at Currier Road 2. Brea Canyon Road at Washington Street 3. Brea Canyon Road at Lycoming Street 4. Brea Canyon Road at SR -60 WB Ramps 5. Golden Springs Drive at SR -EB Ramps The analysis is focused on assessing potential traffic impacts during the morning and evening commute peak hours (between 7:00-9:00 AM, and 4:00-6:00 PM) on a typical weekday. Please note that the study locations were identified using the City's "16 trip threshold criteria". • Level of Service '(LOS) Standards and Significant Impact Criteria - Impacts to local and regional transportation systems are considered significant if: For Signalized Intersections: ❑ the ICU value under "with project" conditions is 0.91 or greater (LOSE or F), and ❑ the ICU increase attributable to the project is 0.02 or greater For Unsignali zed Intersections: Based on the HCMILOS method of analysis, this report identifies a significant traffic impact when the Project causes a change from LOS D to LOS E or F, or the Project causes an increase in delay of 2% or more at an intersection operating LOS E or F. • Existing Traffic Conditions — All of the five key intersections currently operate at satisfactory levels of service (i. e., LOS D or better) during the AM and PM peak hours. • Project Trip Generation — On a "typical" weekday, the proposed Project is forecast to generate 326 daily trips, with 37 trips (32 inbound, 5 outbound) produced in the AM peals hour and 39 trips (8 inbound, 31 outbound) produced in the PM peak hour on a "typical" weekday. LIN SCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineem 37 LLG Ref 2-12-3332 Brea Canyon Business Center Project, Diamond Bar e:9;fl 3r. Bir. �' }o �LLr...rni I'oor,ISLA ti -aur ­1 t, .? crit,A' • Cunnilative Projects Trip Generation - Eight (8) cumulative projects were considered in the cumulative traffic setting. These cumulative projects are expected to generate approximately 87,104 daily trips, with 6,356 trips (5,003 inbound, 1,353 outbound) anticipated during the AM peak hour and 8,891 trips (2,990 inbound, 5,901 outbound) produced during the PM peak hour. All of the eight cumulative projects are anticipated to be operational sometime after near-term year 2014 and before long-term Year 2034. • Year 2012 Existing Traffic Conditions Plus Project— The proposed Project will not significantly impact any of the five key study intersections, when compared to the LOS standards and significant impact criteria specified in this report. The five key study intersections currently operate and are forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable service level during the AM and PM peak hours with the addition of Project generated traffic to existing traffic. • Year 2014 Cunutlafie Traffic Conditions Plus Project — The proposed Project will not significantly impact any of the five key study intersections, when compared to the LOS standards and significant impact criteria specified in this report. The five key study intersections currently operate and are forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable service level during the AM and PM peak hours with the addition of Project generated traffic in Year 2014. • Year 2034 Cunurlative Traffic Conditions Plus Project —The proposed Project will not significantly impact any of the five key study intersections, when compared to the LOS standards and significant impact criteria specified in this report. The five key study intersections currently operate and are forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable service level during the AM and PM peak hours with the addition of Project generated traffic in Year 2034. • State of California (Caltrans) Methodology — The results of the intersections capacity analysis using the State of California (Caltrans) Methodology indicates that traffic associated with the proposed Project will not significantly impact either Brea Canyon Road at SR -60 WB Ramps or Golden Springs Drive at SR -60 EB Ramps when compared to the LOS standards and significant impact criteria specified in this report. Both state-controlled study intersections are forecast to continue to operate at an acceptable LOS with the addition of project generated traffic to existing traffic and under Year 2014 and Year 2034 Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Conditions. • Site Access and Internal Circulation Evaluation —The site access and internal circulation layout for the Project has been reviewed and is adequate to accommodate service/delivery trucks, trash trucks and fire trucks that would service the proposed site. Full-sized WB -40 and YM -50 trucks have difficulties accessing the site and circulating the property. Therefore, the project is proposing that CC& R prohibition be applied to all tenants that take access from the project driveway. This prohibition would only allow access by SU -30 trucks and smaller. • CMP Compliance Assessment: The proposed Project will not have an impact on the Los Angeles County Congestion Management Program roadway network. 3$ LLGRef. 2-12-3332 mond LIN=TT, LAW& GREENSPAN, engineers Brea Canyon Business Center Project, Diamond Bar t' f .I Jr -u¢ unw, i llm.. end 9. ih+.l ub_A._ Tei 1L m+nR _ olzs l'1d 3. July 3, 2013 Mr. Preston Chan Brea Canyon Investment, LLC 17528 East Rowland Street City of Industry, CA 91748 LLG Reference No. 2.12.3332.1 Attachment 7 Subject: Parking Analysis and Management Plan for Brea Canyon Business Center Project Diamond Bar, California Dear Mr. Chan: As requested, Linscott, Law, & Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) is pleased to submit this Parking Analysis and Management Plan for Brea Canyon Business Center Project which is located north of Washington Street and east of Brea Canyon Road in the City of Diamond Bar. As we understand it, a reciprocal parking agreement with the existing site to the north has been developed. It was brought to our attention that one tenant, who is in the process leaving the site, was over utilizing the parking. Therefore a parking study and management plan has been required by the City of Diamond Bar to evaluate the parking requirements and operational needs of the center at future full occupancy. This report evaluates those needs based on application of City code and further application of the Urban Land Institute's (ULI) Shared Parking methodology. Our method of analysis, findings, and recommendations are detailed in the following sections of this report. Briefly, we find the following: Engineers & Planners Traffic Transportation Parking lsnscort, Caw & Greenspan, Ertgieterers 2 Executive Circle Suite 250 Irvine, CA 92614 949.625.6175 r 949.825.6173 F vvww.11genginee rs.c om Pasadena Irvine San Diego Woodland Hills • The combination of existing plus proposed parking supply consists of 91 spaces. It should be noted that the implementation of tandem parking stalls Philip M, Lioacon, PE na2rv2rvh was considered, but based on the current layout of the site and Jack M. Greenspan, PE iaeu existing/proposed tenant uses, it was determined that tandem parking is not William A. Law, PE Roo feasible for this site. Paul W. Wilkinson, PE John P Keating. PE • A code calculation for existing occupancy plus re -occupancy of vacant units David S. Shender, PE requires 91 spaces. John A. Boarman, PE Clare M. Look -Jaeger, PE Richard E. Barretto, PE Keil D. Mafierry, PE An LGM8 Company Frlakd 1966 Mr. Preston Chan July 3, 2013 Page 2 • A shared parking analysis based on ULI methodology results in a peak parking demand of 91 spaces. • Based on observations conducted by the owner of the property, the current parking demand combined with the proposed parking demand of the vacant uses results in a total parking demand that is approximately 5% to 10% less than the proposed parking supply. ■ The mix of site uses (existing plus full occupancy plus proposed Project) yields a theoretical zero surplus/deficiency. • As part of the parking management plan, language will be added to the lease which limits the number of vehicles allowed per code. In addition the number of commercial vehicles will be restricted to 4 per unit for the industrial warehouses. In the event that parking becomes an issue, the Association will have proper recourse to rectify the problem and/or terminate the lease. PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The project site is a rectangular -shared 2.68 -acre vacant parcel of land that is located at 650 Brea Canyon Road. The subject property is located on the northeast corner of Washington Street and Brea Canyon Road in the City of Diamond Bar. The site is currently developed with a surface parking lot and is located adjacent to a 20,571 square -feet (SF) industrial building with surface parking that is now occupied with a mixture of warehouse/office space as now allowed under its current approvals and zoning. The existing industrial building contains ten (10) suites ranging in size from approximately 500 SF to 3,500 SF. Based on information provided by the project applicant, the current mix of "business park" uses consists of Korean Yellow Book, Carpet Wholesaler, CPA firm and Accounting Office, Structural Engineering Firm, Textile Wholesaler, Engineering, Wood Crafter, Ethnic Education (notice to move on June 1, 2013), Medical Equipment (soon to be vacant) and a Vacant Unit. The proposed Project has a reciprocal parking agreement with the existing site to help facilitate parking. Figure I is an aerial of the proposed Project site, including the existing adjacent industrial building. The proposed Project includes the development of a two-story building consisting of 18,351 square -feet (SF) of office use and 3,443 SF of medical office use for a total of 21,794 SF. Figures 2 illustrates the proposed site plan for the Project. Table 1 presents the existing and proposed land use breakdown. Mr. Preston Chan July 3, 2013 Page 3 CODE PARKING REQUIREMENTS The code parking calculation for Brea Canyon Business Center is based on the City's requirements as outlined in Chapter 22.30 — Off -Street Parking and Loading Standards from the City of Diamond Bar Municipal Code. The City's Municipal Code specifies the following parking requirements: ■ Office: one (1) spaces per 400 SF of Gross Floor Area GFA. • Warehouse: one (1) spaces per 1,000 SF of GFA for first 20,000 SF. • Medical Office: one (1) spaces per 250 SF of GFA. Table 2 presents the code parking requirements for existing, vacancies and the proposed Project. Review of Table 2 shows that the existing business park requires 31 spaces while providing 52 spaces on-site. However the proposed Project will require 60 spaces while only providing 37 spaces. This shortfall of panting spaces based on City Code corresponds to the need for a reciprocal parking agreement. The total parking needed by both sites is 91 spaces while the totality of the supply equals 91 spaces resulting in a surplus/deficiency of zero. SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS Shared Parking Methodology Accumulated experience in parking demand characteristics indicates that a mixing of land uses results in an overall parking need that is less than the sum of the individual peak requirements for each land use. Due to the existing and proposed mixed-use characteristics of Brea Canyon Business Center, opportunities to share parking now occur and can be expected to continue with full occupancy. The objective of this shared parking analysis is to forecast the peak parking requirements for the project based on the combined demand patterns of different tenancy types at the site. Shared parking calculations recognize that different uses often experience individual peak parking demands at different times of day, or days of the week. When uses share common parking footprints, the total number of spaces needed to support the collective whole is determined by adding parking profiles (by time of day for weekdays versus weekend days), rather than individual peak ratios as represented in the City of Diamond Bar parking code. In that way, the shared parking approach starts from the City's own code ratios and results in the "design level" parking supply needs of a site. Mr. Preston Chan July 3, 2013 Page 4 There is an important common element between the traditional "code" and the shared parking calculation methodologies; the peak parking ratios or "highpoint" for each land use's parking profile typically equals the "code" parking ratio for that use. The analytical procedures for shared parking analyses are well documented in the Shared Parking, 2nd Edition publication by the Urban Land Institute (ULI). Shared parking calculations for Brea Canyon Business Center utilize hourly parking accumulations developed from field studies of single developments in free-standing settings, where travel by private auto is maximized. These characteristics permit the means for calculating peak parking needs when land use types are combined. Further, the shared parking approach illustrates how, at other than peak parking demand times, an increasing surplus of spaces will service the overall needs of the center. Shared Parking Ratios and Profiles The hourly parking demand profiles (expressed in percent of peak demand) utilized in this analysis and applied to the Brea Canyon Business Center are based on profiles developed by the Urban Land Institute (ULI) and published in Shared Parking, 2nd Edition. The ULI publication presents hourly parking demand profiles for three (3) general land use categories: office, warehousing and medical office. These profiles of parking demand have been used directly, by land use type, in the analysis of this site. It should be noted that parking profiles for warehousing are unavailable so office profiles were utilized in its place. Application of Shared Parking Methodology Table 3 presents the weekday parking demand profiles for Brea Canyon Business Center based on the shared parking methodology, assuming full occupancy of the center plus the proposed Project. Review of Table 3 indicates that the peak profiles for each land use coincide with each other resulting in the same parking requirement as Code. Therefore, the proposed Project site is expected to require 60 spaces while the existing site upon full occupancy will requires 31 spaces. The peak demand is forecast to occur at 10:00 AM and 2:00 PM. Appendix A contains the weekday day shared parking analysis calculation worksheets. Mr. Preston Chan July 3, 2013 Page 5 PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN The overall project consists of two lots: Lot 1 (Subject Property) and Lot 2 (Warehouse/Industrial Property to the North). Due to the parking layout and reciprocal parking agreement, the parking between the two lots is shared. Review of the proposed site plan identifies that the number of parking spaces in Lot 1 consists of 37 spaces, while the number of parking spaces in Lot 2 consists of 54 spaces. It has been determined that, per City code, all the parking requirements have been fulfilled. It has also been determined through parking utilization studies and industry standards, that the current parking situation is adequate. To help facilitate guest/visitor parking, a management plan will be implemented and the following steps will be taken as a precaution to ensure parking remains adequate on site: ■ Owners and employees of the proposed building will be encouraged by the Association and Developer to park in Lot 2, so that there is adequate parking for guests/visitors of the office condo in Lot 1. Notices will be given out to all tenants/owners by the management company to remind the businesses of this practice. • house will incorporate language to limit the The lease for the industrial ware number of vehicles allowed per code. If a tenant is to exceed this amount they will be in violation of their lease terms and will be subject to penalties or termination of their lease if the problem is not resolved. In addition, language will be added to the lease which restricts the number of commercial and company vehicles to 4 per unit. If after the tenant moves in and there are more commercial/company vehicles than allowed, then the lease will be terminated if the issue is not resolved. • 4 parking spaces are being proposed to be added to Lot 2 to provide for a total of 95 parking spaces, which is 4 spaces greater than required amount per City Code. See Figure 3. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 1. Brea Canyon Business Center Project is located at 650 Brea Canyon Road in the City of Diamond Bar. The site is currently developed with a surface parking lot and is located adjacent to a 20,571 square -feet (SF) industrial building with surface parking that is now occupied with a mixture of warehouse/office. The proposed Project includes the development of a two-story building consisting of 18,351 square -feet (SF) of office use and 3,443 SF of medical office use for a total of 21,794 SF. Mr. Preston Chan July 3, 2013 Page 6 2. Direct application of City parking codes to the existing and proposed mix of uses of Brea Canyon Business Center results in a total parking requirement of 91 parking spaces. With a proposed parking supply of 91 spaces, a code surplus/deficiency of zero spaces is indicated. 3. Given the mix of center tenancies, a shared parking analysis has been prepared. The ULI methodology yields the same results as City code with a proposed parking supply of 91 spaces, a surplus/deficiency of zero spaces in indicated. 4. As part of the parking management plan, language will be added to the lease which limits the number of vehicles allowed per code. In addition the number of commercial vehicles will be restricted to 4 per unit for the industrial warehouses. In the event that parking becomes an issue, the Association will have proper recourse to rectify the problem and/or terminate the lease. We appreciate the opportunity to prepare this analysis for Brea Canyon Business Center. Should you have any questions or need additional assistance, please do not hesitate to call me at (949) 825-6175. Very truly yours, Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers Keil D. Mabe E. Principal cc: Attachments (NO';SCALE SOURCE: BING KEY PROJECT SITE FIGURE 1 EXISTING AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER PROJECT, DIAMOND BAR «, / HSI OVI, AS IY, [ I j ,[ 2L MAAYII NYtl I II 1 .1NL !1' II 1 I FiK .I�VM I I R!� h CP}IM 1 J + 4 r x 111 "i�c PARI s'41 m, I LOTH a Maw qa 20,571 SF i [9' 4' 511111Ax 111SIINN Y rbc aE1 PRIVATE LANEWAYAND FIRE 4ANE I� awT °L eb ^ 0.NIISiMFNi 10 S 1N �D B a LOb � N4 SInF 91wVx C -a o, 26-a' rn �I I amu I I 1V� n ,, 16 � I SITS 10, ] f i 2117 SF R!, L' olvwrcr x x�u r� — OVERALL SITE PLAN OF TWTJ NEIGHBORING PARCELS a o WA511INGTON 5TKIf,T - / FIGURE 2 ®NO SCALE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER PROJECT, DIAMOND BAR �+ V �Tr II I_4 ° v � II 6 6II T ,' ,T 1 5 FIGURE 3 (NO SCALE PROPOSED ADDITIONAL 4 SPACES BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER PROJECT, DIAMOND BAR 2 ---� -- } T PRIVATE DRIVEWAY AND FIRE 4ANE r— — % LEI —11 W 32 -- o T ,' ,T 1 5 FIGURE 3 (NO SCALE PROPOSED ADDITIONAL 4 SPACES BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER PROJECT, DIAMOND BAR TABLE 1 LAND USE SUMMARYZ Description Building Size (SF) Existin Office 5,847 SF Warehouse - 6,052 SF Subtotal: 11,899 SF Vacantt Office 953 SF Warehouse 7,719 SF Subtotal: 8,672 SF Proposed Office 18,351 SF Medical Office 3,443 SF Subtotal: 21,794 SF Total Square Footage for Both Sites 42,365 SF I Source:CD/A 2 Assumes the vacancy of Suites 628, 630 and 644 (Medical Equipment and Ethnic Education). TABLE 2 CITY CODE PARKING REQUIREMENT 3 Source: City of Diamond Bar, Chapter 22.30—Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards. T _T O i - a - E g y a V a a a c _ i - _ F m a A � w 3 E = z w" y L � a — E z a a m 9 w o E m � ws E a w3 a c"a y' p h w 6 N k z w s 9 C 8 e � a - g _ z ss $ a APPENDIX A UU PARKING CALCULATION WORKSHEETS Appendix Table Al OFFICE WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [I] Brea Canyon Business Center Project, Diamond Bar Land Use Office Sino 18.351 KSF 'kg Rate[21 2.5 /KSF Gross 46 Spaces Spaces 4 Visitor Spc 42 Emp. Spc. Shared Time %Of 4 O %Of #Of Parking of Day Peak [31 Spaces Peak [31 Spaces Demand 0% 0 3% 1 1 6:00 AM 13 % 0 30% 13 7:00 AM 33 8:00 AM 20% 1 75% 32 60 % 2 95% 40 42 9:00 AM 46 10:00 AM 100% 4 100% 42 11:00 AM 45% 2 100% 42 44 39 12:00 PIM 15% 1 90% 38 1:00 PM 45% 2 90% 38 40b6 0 PM 100% 4 100% 42 45 % 2 100% 42 44 2PM 39 4:00 PM 15% 1 90% 38 p 50% 21 21 5:00 PM 10% Il 6:00 PM 5% 0 25% 11 7:00 P 2% 0 10% a 4 M 3 8:00 PM 1% 0 7% 3 0% 0 3% 9:00 PM ° 0 1% ° 10:00 PM 0% 0 ° 11:00 PM 0 % 0 0% 0 12:°o AM 0% 0 0% 0 Notes: [I] Source: ULI-Urban Lund Institute "Shared Parking," Seeond Edition, 2005. [2] Packing rates for all land uses based on ULl procedure normalized to express percentage in terms of absolute peak demand ratios. Bmakdown of guestvs. employee (3] Percentage of peak parking demand factors r-Rcetrelationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual. Appendix Table A2 MEDICALIDENTAL OFFICE Notes: [11 Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Second Edition, 2005. [21 Parking rates for all land uses based on ULI procedure normalized to express percentage in terms of absolute peak demand ratios. Breakdown of guest vs. employee [31 Percentage of peak parking demand factors reflect relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [t] Brea Canyon Business Center Project, Diamond Bar MedicaMental Office Land Use Size 3.443 SSE Pkg Rale[21 4.0 /KSF Gross 14 Spaces Spaces 9 Visitor S e. 5 Trap. Spc. Shared Time % Of # Of % Of 9 Of Parking. of Day Peak [31 Spaces Peak [31 Spaces Demand 6:00 AM 0% 0 0% 0 0 7:00 AM 0% 0 0% 0 0 8:00 AM 90% 8 60% 3 11 9:00 AM 90% 8 100% 5 13 10:00 AM 100% 9 100% 5 14 11:00 AM 100% 9 100% 5 14 12:00 PM 30% 3 100% 5 8 1:00 PM 901A 8 100% 5 13 2:00 PM 100% 9 100% 5 14 3:00 PM 100% 9 100% 5 14 4:00 PM 90% 8 100% 5 13 5:00 PM 80% 7 100% 5 12 6:00 PM 67% 6 67% 3 9 7:00 PM 30% 3 30% 2 5 8:00 PM 15% 1 15% 1 2 9:00 PM 0% 0 0% 0 0 10'00 PM 0% 0 0% 0 0 11:00 PM 0% 0 0% 0 0 12:00 AM 0% 0 Notes: [11 Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Second Edition, 2005. [21 Parking rates for all land uses based on ULI procedure normalized to express percentage in terms of absolute peak demand ratios. Breakdown of guest vs. employee [31 Percentage of peak parking demand factors reflect relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual Appendix Table A3 OFFICE WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS (]] Brea Canyon Business Center Project, Diamond Bar Existing Office Land Use Stye 5.847 KSF 'kg Rate[21 2.5 /KSF Gross 15 Spaces Spaces I Visitor Spc. 14 Rmp. Spa Shared Time %Of #Of % Of #Of Parking of Day Peak [3] Spaces Peak [31 Spaces Demand 6:00 AM 0% 0 3% 0 0 7:00 AM 1% 0 30% 4 4 8:00 AM 20% 0 75% 11 11 9:00 AM 60% 1 95% 13 ]4 10:00 AM 100% I 100% 14 IS L1:00 AM 45% 0 100% 14 14 12:00 PM 15% 0 90% 13 13 1:00 PM 45% 0 90% 13 13 2:00 PM 100 % 100% 1 14 15 3:00 PM 45% 0 100% 14 14 4:OOPM 15% 0 90% 3 3 5:00 PM 10 p 50% 7 7 6:00 PM 5% p 25% 4 4 7:00 PM 0 2% 0 % 8:00 PM 1% 0 7% 1 1 9:00 PM 0% 0 3% 0 D 10:00 PM 0% 0 I% 0 0 11:00 YM 0% 0 0% 0 0 12:00 AM 0% 0 0% 0 0 Notes: Institute "Shared Parking," Second Edition,2005. [1] Souse: ULl-Urban Land [21 Parking rates for all lard uses based on ULI procedure normalized to express in terms of absolute peak demand ratios. Breakdown Of guess. employee percentage Percentage of peak parking demand factors reflect relationsbips between weekday [3] parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual. Appendix Table A4 WAREHOUSE WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS (11 Brea Canyon Business Center Project, Diamond Bar Land Use Existing Warehouse (Offlee Profile) Size 6.052 KSF Pkg Rate(21 1.0 /KSF Gross 6 Spaces Spaces 0 Visitor Spa. 6 Em p. Spe. Shared. Time -A Of NOf %Of #Of Parking of Day Peak [3] Spaces Peak (31 Spaces Demand 6:00 AM 0% 0 3% 0 0 2 7:00 AM 1% 0 30% 2 0 75% 5 20% 5 8:00 AM 0 95% 6 6 60% 9:00 AM p 100% 6 6 10:00 AM 100-/. 6 p 100% 6 11:00 AM 45% 5 p 90% 5 12:00 PM 13% s 5 i:00PM 45% 0 90% :00 PM 100% p 100% 6 6 3:00 PM 45 p 100% 6 G 5% 5 4:00 PM 0 90% 5 3 0% 5;00 PM 0 50% 3 2 p 6:00 PM 5% 25% 2 1 7:00 PM 2% 0 10% 1 p 0 8:00 PM 1% 0 7% 0 0% 0 3% 0 9:Qo PM 0 0% 0 1% 0 1o:ooPM o a 11:00PM 0% 0 0% 12:00 AM 0% 0 0% o U Notes: [11 Source: ULI- Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking,' Second Pdition, 2005- [21 Parking rates for sll land uses based on ULI procedure normalized to express percentage in terms of absolute peak demand ratios. Breakdown of guestvs. employee [31 Percentage of peak parking demand factors reflect relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual. Appendix Table A5 OFFICE WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1] Brea Canyon Business Center Project, Diamond Bar Land Use Vacant Office Size Pkg Rate[21 0.953 KSF 2.5 /KSF Gross 2 Spaces Spaces 0 Visitor Sp. 2 Emp, Spc. Shared Time of Day % Of Peak [31 #O£ %Of Spaces Peak [31 #Of Spaces Parking Demand 6:00 AM 0% 0 3% 0 0 7:00 AM 1% 0 30% 1 1 8:00 AM 20% 9:00 AM 60% 0 95% 2 2 10:00 AM 100% 0 l00% 2 2 11:00 AM 45 % 0 100 % 2 2 12:00PM 15% 0 90% 2 2 1:00 PM 45% 0 90% 2 2 2:00 PM 100% 0 100% 2 2 3:00 PM 45% 0 100% 2 2 4:00 PM 15% 0 90% 2 2 5:00PM 10% 0 50% 1 1 6:00 PM 5% 0 25% 1 1 7:00 PM 2% 0 10% 0 0 8:00 PM 1% 0 7% 0 0 9:00 PM 0% 0 3% 0 0 10:00 PM 0% 0 1% 0 0 11:00PM 0% 0 0% 0 0 12:00 AM 0% 0 0% 0 0 Notes: [ll Source: ULI- Thban Land Institute "Shaved Parking" Second Edition, 2005. [2[ Parking rates for all land uses based on ULI procedure normalized to express percentage in terms of absolute peak demand ratios. Breakdown of guestvs. employee 131 Percentage of peak parking demand factors reflect relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual. Appendix Table All WAREHOUSE WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1] Brea Canyon Business Center Project, Diamond Bar Land Use Vacant Warehouse (Olfice Profile) Size Pkg Rate[21 7.719 KSF 1.0 /KSF Gross 8 Spaces Spaces 1 Visitor Spe. 7 Emp. Spa Shared Time of Day %Of Peak [31 #Of %Of Spaces Peak [31 #Of Spaces Parking Demand ,6:00 AM 0% 0 3% 0 0 7:00 AM 1% 0 30% 2 2 8:00 AM 20% 0 75% 5 5 9:00 AM 60% 1 95% 7 8 10:00 AM 100% 1 100% 7 8 11:00 AM 45% 0 100% 7 7 12:00 PM 15% 0 90% 6 6 1:00 PM 45% 0 90% 6 6 2:00PM 100% 1 100% 7 8 3:00 PM 45% 0 100% 7 7 4:00 PM 15% 0 90% 6 6 5:00 PM 10% 0 50% 4 4 6:00 PM 5% 0 25% 2 2 7:00 PM90000E 0 10% 1 1 8:00 PM7'. 0 0 9:00 PM3% 0 0 10:00 PM 1% 0 0 11:00PM 0% 0 0 12:00 AM 0% 0 0 Notes: [1] Source: ULI-Urban Land Institute"Shared Parking,"Second Edition,2005. [2] Parking rates for all land uses based on ULI procedure noanalizcd to express percentage in terms of absolute peak demand ratios. Breakdown of guestvs. employee [3] Percentage ofpeak parking demand factors reflect relationships between weekday parlting demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual. FROM (WED)JUL 3 2013 16:051ST.16:0+ Attachment 8 This LEASE TERMtNAT1ON AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made as of the date of execution by both parties, by and between ppCN investment, LLC ("Landlord'), and GCTI Ambulance (`-Tenant'). Landlord and Tenant are parties to that certain Lease dated January 1, 2013 (the "Lease) regarding the property commonly known as 630 Brea Canyon Road, Diamond Bar, CA 91789 (the "Excised premises"). The Lease provides for an original commencement date of January 1, 2013, and provides for an original termination date of December 31, 2014. The parties now desire to provide for the termination of the Lease, and the return of the Leased Premises to Landlord, prior to the expiration of the original expiration date of the Lease. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises herein contained and other good and valuable consideration, the parties hereto agree as follows: I. Termination. The parties agree that in lieu of the original expiration date of December 31, 2014, the Lease shall ternilnate on AIJG1lCT x0 2013 (the `°lermination Datc'�, Not later than the Termination Date, Tenant shall quit the Leased Premises and shall surrender and return the Leased Premises to Landlord clean and in good condition and repair, reasonable wear and tear exoepted. Tenant shall also return to Landlord all keys, passcerds and to by ord in connection with the Leased Promises. Te int also agreesimilar tems thatthat all of Tenant's personal1property shall. be removed ftm the Leased premises by the Termination Data 2. Continued Performance. The parties agree that each shall continue to perform the party's respective obligations contained in the Lease including, but not limited to, Tenant's obligation to pay rent, through the Termination Date- If the Termination Date is other than the last day of the month, then the parties agree that the rent attributable to that part of the month through the Termination Orate shall be prorated, based upon the daily rate. 3. Releases Upon Tenant satisfying the conditions set forth in paragraph 1 above, Landlord and Tenant hereby release, discharge and waive any claims against each other arising out of or in any way connected with the Lease and Tenant's possession of the Leased premises, through the date of this Agreement; except that Landlord shall not waive any claims for indemnification, contribution or apportionment of claims or liability brought against Landlord by any third party resulting from Tenant's possession and use ofthe Leased Premises, nor shall Landlord waive any claims for damages resulting from any latent or hidden defects or hazardous materials contamination caused by Tenant or resulting from Tenant's possession ana use of the Leased Premises. 4. r.yy peV;c_ This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit ofthe parties hereto and their respective heirs, successors and assigns. FROM (WED)JUL 3 2013 16:05/ST.18:04/W0,7520818282 p 1 $. Final Aaroement 'Ibis Agrcement shallconstitute the fhW a modified only t and understanding of the parties on the subjW mre atW hereof. This Agreemetn mt and have freely by a further writing signed by the parties. The parties have read this Agreemen with frill understanding of its terms. and Voltmtmily entered into this Agreement 6. Att MM Fees. If any legal action is commenced to enforce of interpret the terms of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to re asonnble attorneys' foes and costs in addition to any odw relief to which the prevailing patty MAY be entitled. IN WITNESS WHWOF, lite patties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date below written. TENANT, GC."TI AM ULANCE: LANDLORD, ?" UiVESTMIENT Date: e F% ,,�,FIREOEPT. NOTES r,G CATHODE PEER MIN 0 AS PSI FOR A TOASTER 0 ', SVGA ITTI INSTALL. IDERAMPAS NLYAEES°SLOWINNGSTFi"AOWYMBUED UP awEVE FBEENTO HFFIRE ME AMOUNTS TIRE ROW 15 BASER ON THE EOLLeWIN6 U10N5. TAND AT CDN9TRUCRION PEAFEE uI OINc CODE T EWE S1. METUR WOFLOOR RN ON NTHE ITPLERIR FLOOR ARG OF AL ND UNIONS HOER MAL PRO.IFri OF TH E TROD, OFOLDFALLS^ACORNS REDUCTION HREIS,�o"nxsox)DONE TOTAL FFI WRGEWMENT:2.00 1850 PDM AT 20 P61 R61OOAi PRESSURE. ADDS 1. WAR IS BE V9R 5 ^FFEM OVE �EVAIFAIR OR OTHER `IAT APPROVE RHOCES OR E TO AVE BACKINGE THATINCUL WON, NO FISSION PIKE LANE MAN' 1111 B 11 FOR FIRE APPARATUS `ESS INA°, TO G SUCH AN R PRINTER TIRE HEREOF AS EASTERN [ FIRE ISCHOUTTHE ENTRANCE P" EXISTING PL— LEON VERIFIED BY LA. COUNTS FIRE DE?AR�IEN; 651 BREA CANYON AD CGM BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER DIAMOND BAR, CA 91789 f0. BNILJ / EXISTING TRASH— /' ENCLOSURE AS IS TO BE SHARED WITH LOT I AND LOT II EASEMENT I\ I / M. `PNC 61 /C, 48 11 UI,�EXISTTO L �ADI�G I CALLS �. . i A,TO CA PAs IDS' -11 1/4" '.. DISTANCE BET^WEEN FH. SE SITE PLAN OF TWO NEIGHBORING PARCELS `"] C2PaID .,— WA5 H lNGTON` STRE n A.R.: NIOATED POWDER) PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET INDEX PARTICIPANTS LANDSCAPE (SEE LANDSCAPE) - ❑3 E%ISTINI PARKING LOT PAVING MBRE55: MIT N. G GIN ROAD, OIOMONO BPP, CA 91)0.9 AS -100 q5-101 OVERALL SITE PIAN & PROJECT DATA PROJECT SHE PIAN (LOT 1) OW.A CANYON o VE SIM ENTS, LLL 1°]526 EAST P "'OS SiREfl Cltt OF INOUEIRY. 91 ]46 CRUCHNS LGI..R PE PRESTON CHAR. SIT LINO HI`LLI A 91]09 EXISTING L NOS CAPE SETBgCHS: CAL ZONING: 6]19 -010 -HO k 6719-°10-902 0-P 09] ACRE) A$-102 As -103 Qs -1 SITE BELL SITE DETAILS SURVEY HO E MA) 913-6939 A%:N(626) 913-1911 CONTACT REGAN YAP ATARI AGO, 215-fi0A3 I' PRESIONCHAN9]OGMAILLOM CONTACT: PRESTON CHAIN f, I, `/ '. / 1 Q GT ANDFA: PROPOSED USE' 1VPE OF CONSTRUCTION, FIRE SPAT DEFEAT ( SEPAAAFE PEAMN) FIRE RATING (CBC 601) OCCUPANCY CROUP: PROPOSED AREA IST FLOOR, END NLGRi 42,333 t SE (1 (DUE TU LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT) T Of TILE 4E➢ICAL (OJ ) (SEE R R AAFA FOR DETAILS) TYPE VB YES L NFPA 13 NON -MRO B 2 794 5F 10, 4l9 s.E 10,015 SE. i _Cl, 3 2 OF 3 2 OF 3 2QL-1 L-2 L-} A-101 A-102 -2U1 1 A -RO10 A-501 E-2 TENTATIVE TRP CF MAPME GRAB] NG ANO DRAINAGE PLAN GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLW EROSION CONTROL P IRRIGATION PLANINGN} IST AND TREE PVN IST AND INNS FLOOR PUN ROOF PUN ELEVATIONS COLOR ELEVATIONS WINDOW AND DOUR SCHEDULE SITE PUN & LIGHTING CONTROL CRUTNE OE mry AssOCIATEs W 17121 L RO MIL STREET. Cltt OUSTRY. G 91]98 PPLON& (626) 9F3-6101 F (626N 0.3-BF02 CON ADH: EERICN®ry M-ARL.COM u 5567CAUE LAMBERT ROAD NC BPFA, CP 92821 E (]1 LK 6]o a ( ) 6]+ _HMC M EE®CALUNO EN T. ACK IEE P ENGINEER NYC cervsuvlxc ENGINEERS, INc. 55fi N. DIAMOND SAR BLVD., /304 pIAMOrvO BAR CA US. FOUND: (.Aj 369-elfie (9°9) 369-61 fig ENTAIL HV C®HYCENCINEER.LOM CONTACT. AW, WG LANDSCAPE ARcxOscrs Of E cx.PMAN AVE NLIfRiON CP 92631 P, (]1,J ,49 9300 FIX ,(]OR)W q 9302 _ ASSRW 6LANMCAPGROHITELTOOM COMAE: CAREY ORWc A.R.: NIOATED POWDER) E-6 PHO70MMIIC PLAN 0.25 - HOT D. LANDSCAPE (SEE LANDSCAPE) - ❑3 E%ISTINI PARKING LOT PAVING SCOPE OF WORK BUILDING HEIGH?x ux a E_opAICB C51 NEW CURB (SEE CIVIL FOR DETAIL ) 35'-o" 35'-O' NEW CONSTRUCTION OF 2 STUDY OFFICE SETBgCHS: PROPUSEO BUILDING ON A VACANT BUILDING PAS. MIN MAL CHANGE i0 THE POSTING AWARD FRONT (BREA GN YON) 2O'-0" 51FE L FIROT (W HINGTON DA) 20' .,I'D,2IS CM77 SF ISISF, SIDE (NBRHC D' -D^ 5'-]' LEGAL DESCRIPTION DUE (WEST) O' O^ IfiO's ANNNI..f 93OSF LANDSCAPE R Alp PPOPOSEo PARCELS 1 k 2 OF PARCEL MPP N0. (OF Lln �2 ft 274 F 16640. IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, SON OWN (11,59] SF) COUNTY OF LOS COUPLED, STATE OF PARKING TO MN REQUIRES PROPOSED CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 161. PIECES 74 TO 75 OF PARCEL (OF FORD AREA) 54 1245 MAPS. IN THE COUNTY RECORDER OFFICE (2,319 IF If 16,]80 9F) OF SAID COUNT'. PARKINGANALYS/S 11 PUBLIC ADJACENT BURCINGAND PROJECT BUILDING SPATECO C) 9165E =3,2665E - SHOWING ENTIREPARKING COUNT 1,1. ST IIA50 11, TOTAL CODESUMMARY ALL WORK PERTAINING roNN Au MER ATw15UP SP IED 'IF FOISTING AND ESSAILIONG LAX ox FACT 00.11 WrtH PRO " NO CANCER IN THE ALT OCUMF SFDR"AMHARS REGULATORS AND ORDINANCES ICABLE MEUP WEREASSAIll OTHER 11 TIMES AL 10 9A CALF °w"II"A ALSACE E, p® D3 DRUM (c9c) SO D �al'F R wA PRE CED- (� ) DUECALURA CIA CODE pE E(CMC) INTO ORDERED. FOUNDER AND LOCAL AMENDMENTS CODE (CPC) L t / e3 t PARKING COUNT PARKING REQUIRED 91 PARKING PROVIDED 91 LOT - NEW PROPOSED 101 LIT 21 J9< SF 'DAMAGED 37 MEDICAL QFFICE 3,g43 sF ITDI(PER TABLE 11 B-6) 2 O 1/0.50 SF I4 FS IGHATED (PER TABLE 5.105,3 2) BUSINESS OFFlCE 18,151 sF LOi sl SHARED WITH LOT I DARNING FE - W 1/400 FI 46 TAN MRD IS LOT H - 1XITIM WAREHousE BCYafs PARK Nc DECLINES 2 , RO A]1 SF HDR' TERM (5x OF TOTAL PARKING) STAN SPACE BBDO sF LONG TERM (52 OF TATA, PARKING) 2 ® 1O40E SF 11 Blcyclf PARKING PROVIDED 4 (tlj WAREHOUSE SPACE 13,T/1 BF SH°RiTEN 2 49 1/1000 IF 1, LONE TERM 2 OOR AREAS ❑9 FIRE RISER 1. 11V ONS, ACE, "I URGE IO AS, APPROVED GRATE COVER OVER THE V GUTTER (V GUTTER REFER TO CIVIL 1 AN APPROVED FIRE EMBBLEF FULATEN SPOT AS LEGEND roR REVI°W"AANND APPROVAL, THEIL"M TO ES. SYSTEM IE BY OFFERS. NEERING ROVEMENT 6a L""' IN M -E RED SDR` 5%Mw`IN THEAV`LL"IDAE" O S GNRE�E CRAIG. PROCESSGAS THEEDNI EAGER,o 00 of 2, CIVIL ATES 6 VATRIN`" : V 2%VASE FORCE PA' AT 1G." AIL. c"Dxmlwre`°iR�,NIPRGCEss AS AEEER o Ixm` NUAx TITO GEw11 mEm 21 SLOPE IN AD lCllOII By Owe`.TO RE I THFaS RATESPAT ONRIEVIND NS OF,TUNE, ro E^P'CetI . AN ETHNIC HN,L LRTRRN OF TENANT DIPOLE PREDICTIRGE ONS, —RN --PROPERTY LINE �� �����CAR f����M�>������D AUGUST ��PIU�AL^�'�� ------ E%ISTNO, TO BE REMOVED �5 Rwk:I, SEN.M'DCi SIS°x uMaiva F. PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNT BUSINESS ARG 21,794 SF OCCUPANT LOAD FACTOR FOR OUSUDGE ARG" 2O0 SF/PERSON (PER CPL TABLE A) TOTAL OCCUPANT LOA" 21,794 / 2°°= IOB9] UC PERSON MALE: 5E FEMALE 55 SITE KEY NOTES R cLa n rtuNE J SITE ENTRY BOOM NO.4USE-AREAD LANDSCAPE (SEE LANDSCAPE) - ❑3 E%ISTINI PARKING LOT PAVING © ❑4 TING CURB SAIRE1. C51 NEW CURB (SEE CIVIL FOR DETAIL ) 'a' © EXISTING FIRE HYDRANTS >. - �] PROPERTY LINE OFFICE 169 O POPPBSED NEW EIRE HYDRANT ❑9 FIRE RISER 1. 11V ONS, ACE, "I URGE IO AS, APPROVED GRATE COVER OVER THE V GUTTER (V GUTTER REFER TO CIVIL 1 AN APPROVED FIRE EMBBLEF FULATEN SPOT AS LEGEND roR REVI°W"AANND APPROVAL, THEIL"M TO ES. SYSTEM IE BY OFFERS. NEERING ROVEMENT 6a L""' IN M -E RED SDR` 5%Mw`IN THEAV`LL"IDAE" O S GNRE�E CRAIG. PROCESSGAS THEEDNI EAGER,o 00 of 2, CIVIL ATES 6 VATRIN`" : V 2%VASE FORCE PA' AT 1G." AIL. c"Dxmlwre`°iR�,NIPRGCEss AS AEEER o Ixm` NUAx TITO GEw11 mEm 21 SLOPE IN AD lCllOII By Owe`.TO RE I THFaS RATESPAT ONRIEVIND NS OF,TUNE, ro E^P'CetI . AN ETHNIC HN,L LRTRRN OF TENANT DIPOLE PREDICTIRGE ONS, —RN --PROPERTY LINE �� �����CAR f����M�>������D AUGUST ��PIU�AL^�'�� ------ E%ISTNO, TO BE REMOVED �5 Rwk:I, SEN.M'DCi SIS°x uMaiva F. PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNT BUSINESS ARG 21,794 SF OCCUPANT LOAD FACTOR FOR OUSUDGE ARG" 2O0 SF/PERSON (PER CPL TABLE A) TOTAL OCCUPANT LOA" 21,794 / 2°°= IOB9] UC PERSON MALE: 5E FEMALE 55 GR035 R cLa n rtuNE OR BOOM NO.4USE-AREAD aRFA ROOM M. A USE AREA AREA MED OFFICE 1W DUST ST. 12D13IF, SAIRE1. 1,.35E I N, 303 SF. M EO "LL -EX ]AB°.SE 11,9305.1. OFFICE 200. IAII SE11.363SF, OFFICE 169 9]]S.E "E'LAF. OFF]CEISE If,A." ,,.A All .,I'D,2IS CM77 SF ISISF, S�NI VIN.5F CORE IF CARDS 1. OFIE2 1%68 .2345P ]]Sf ISUN AA. "I'll", BE, ANNNI..f 93OSF WADI BATN CALIVIN CALL, 305E MEN BUD 1 SON OWN 1335E - MAILROOM ]15 i` ILL RISER RM g35f ELEVATOR AM ]SS,F, IGNITOR 1M255 .E FIRE PIPE AM 93 SE PUBLIC PUBLIC SPATECO C) 9165E =3,2665E S PACEIM ISI) 1,1. ST IIA50 11, TOTAL RACESE. INTUAL 09] ❑9 FIRE RISER 1. 11V ONS, ACE, "I URGE IO AS, APPROVED GRATE COVER OVER THE V GUTTER (V GUTTER REFER TO CIVIL 1 AN APPROVED FIRE EMBBLEF FULATEN SPOT AS LEGEND roR REVI°W"AANND APPROVAL, THEIL"M TO ES. SYSTEM IE BY OFFERS. NEERING ROVEMENT 6a L""' IN M -E RED SDR` 5%Mw`IN THEAV`LL"IDAE" O S GNRE�E CRAIG. PROCESSGAS THEEDNI EAGER,o 00 of 2, CIVIL ATES 6 VATRIN`" : V 2%VASE FORCE PA' AT 1G." AIL. c"Dxmlwre`°iR�,NIPRGCEss AS AEEER o Ixm` NUAx TITO GEw11 mEm 21 SLOPE IN AD lCllOII By Owe`.TO RE I THFaS RATESPAT ONRIEVIND NS OF,TUNE, ro E^P'CetI . AN ETHNIC HN,L LRTRRN OF TENANT DIPOLE PREDICTIRGE ONS, —RN --PROPERTY LINE �� �����CAR f����M�>������D AUGUST ��PIU�AL^�'�� ------ E%ISTNO, TO BE REMOVED �5 Rwk:I, SEN.M'DCi SIS°x uMaiva F. PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNT BUSINESS ARG 21,794 SF OCCUPANT LOAD FACTOR FOR OUSUDGE ARG" 2O0 SF/PERSON (PER CPL TABLE A) TOTAL OCCUPANT LOA" 21,794 / 2°°= IOB9] UC PERSON MALE: 5E FEMALE 55 NTE: TENANT SPACES WILL BE PROVIDES W1IH PLUMBING FATHER CONFORMING TO CPC TABLE 4 1 •OFFICE OR PUBLIC BUILDERSFOR EMPIDYEE ALLOWABLEAREA OF OPENING CALCULATED ELEVATOR: NORTH ELEVATION SPRINKLED -------------YES FIRE SEPARATION DISTANCE -----5'-0" ARM ALLOWABLE AREA OF OPENING — , THER 25% PER TABLE 705.8 PROMISED AREA OF OPENING: IST UNHA: 14.]F 14.7 % 125 Of THEREFORE OKAY WINDOWS ARO OPENING AREA 193 SE TOTAL SPECIFIED AREA 1309 SF AND BOOR: 059. BS % A 25%; THEREFORE OKAY WINDOWS AND OPENING AREA 135 SF TOTAL ELEVATOR AREA 1589 BE OPEN STAIRCASE WHA .All N,V1M TG CARTHERESSALL, ORANGE AWARE TO AND 2ND MR MR NWO IT lA ME SO FORM, -1 VART IT FACK x w FE NET HE TRALL I A SEROAND 1 111 1 lSS6A� TSU �r mmoGAD mmI AM 0Nu , 1-11 2ND FLOOR A __SI;- r -la RU A o� NO, FURFACKE, ([I+•J.D. Rm NNA A 11 =x0.- m IST FLOOR Attachment 9 "I _L1 iEATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES RLBSCURE Inbllm CeeiI WnON I SSIG 18131m 12"WIR P®E. CW. KNE /, CA. YPm¢m ,ry'.Nverc[Ylre wtS AUAww.lz. [PI a [T: BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER 6'ABRESPHROURWO CAUIMD RAR.G 911A9 Client, BREA CANYON INVESTMENT, LLC x 4 cWE, Ic-, AR.S9 Ti IU[: OVERALL SITE PLAN & PROJECT DATA SOAP I 9[. 1. STA F 23 NA. I If Q1PLAN CHECK CORRECTION DATED OCT. IL 2G12 2 DATEDODEC. HECK 200 RRECTION 20112 PLAN CHECK CORRECTION 3 DATED FEB, 1 L .13 PLAN CHECK CORRECTION 5 DATED MAR, B, 2D13 DIP "'S' NA: AS -100 Beaufim YA'E2`) raW1DE9 R cLa n rtuNE rs TeLx NRm NTE: TENANT SPACES WILL BE PROVIDES W1IH PLUMBING FATHER CONFORMING TO CPC TABLE 4 1 •OFFICE OR PUBLIC BUILDERSFOR EMPIDYEE ALLOWABLEAREA OF OPENING CALCULATED ELEVATOR: NORTH ELEVATION SPRINKLED -------------YES FIRE SEPARATION DISTANCE -----5'-0" ARM ALLOWABLE AREA OF OPENING — , THER 25% PER TABLE 705.8 PROMISED AREA OF OPENING: IST UNHA: 14.]F 14.7 % 125 Of THEREFORE OKAY WINDOWS ARO OPENING AREA 193 SE TOTAL SPECIFIED AREA 1309 SF AND BOOR: 059. BS % A 25%; THEREFORE OKAY WINDOWS AND OPENING AREA 135 SF TOTAL ELEVATOR AREA 1589 BE OPEN STAIRCASE WHA .All N,V1M TG CARTHERESSALL, ORANGE AWARE TO AND 2ND MR MR NWO IT lA ME SO FORM, -1 VART IT FACK x w FE NET HE TRALL I A SEROAND 1 111 1 lSS6A� TSU �r mmoGAD mmI AM 0Nu , 1-11 2ND FLOOR A __SI;- r -la RU A o� NO, FURFACKE, ([I+•J.D. Rm NNA A 11 =x0.- m IST FLOOR Attachment 9 "I _L1 iEATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES RLBSCURE Inbllm CeeiI WnON I SSIG 18131m 12"WIR P®E. CW. KNE /, CA. YPm¢m ,ry'.Nverc[Ylre wtS AUAww.lz. [PI a [T: BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER 6'ABRESPHROURWO CAUIMD RAR.G 911A9 Client, BREA CANYON INVESTMENT, LLC x 4 cWE, Ic-, AR.S9 Ti IU[: OVERALL SITE PLAN & PROJECT DATA SOAP I 9[. 1. STA F 23 NA. I If Q1PLAN CHECK CORRECTION DATED OCT. IL 2G12 2 DATEDODEC. HECK 200 RRECTION 20112 PLAN CHECK CORRECTION 3 DATED FEB, 1 L .13 PLAN CHECK CORRECTION 5 DATED MAR, B, 2D13 DIP "'S' NA: AS -100 LEGEND 1 1 MUM ryFiT,-111AIs4 -0 WIDE ACCESCAUSELE zmu rHEA°R n wlEL WGID ui pRTUPOcRwTS mswTATDiOxSE ILTHE oxto vpmYmu NET 11 TREATING F TAI LEELA=WAN COLLINSCORNERS -- -— PROPERTY LINE ------ EXISTING. TO BE REMOVED Q NOTES R uy TINED N A pA PERLY °Irvc naFAsrv�auµo icREw 1 , OCCUPANCY OF DEDUCED CAROL NOT COMMENCE SITE ENTRY SUCH SUCH TIME HE ALL CALIFORNIA PRICING CODE AND STATE FIRE ORBITAL "CLAYEACTUR 1 I - _........__ GAS RELY MAY THA GAINED SHELF 11 ,FAOEMENi"ClE[ANCE (SEE CIVl4)"- NSPEOGRAG LANE STIMPLEANCE PRIOR RD POPPY LANDSCAPE (SEE LANDSCAPE)auLsxL RM VE° Of DUE OUTLAYS AN' PERMIT SAFETY OR WORDYORIZED SUCHAFF CAERE FSPENTPE °X ACCT Ell HE ,(RHAL Ys FAO. THE RATE OF SUCH PARMYOR WORK ,CA DISCONTINUED AND EXISTING PARKING LOT PAVING MET BEENSEINED-OPECTORff ON THE ASR CARD WE THE 1 3 13 THE DRS k BMP R RwEN15 (SAND BA6 ACIA oN ATTEMPTS CAUSING LEE OPERATION ACT OR EQUIPMENT SED IN READY ET ® oFuoLITION MEE SETTLE COUR ATENI .- pu.A BETWEEN THE HOURS CE PASO AM AND s. CIE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT "DS ALERrSAD' HEAD rvo M Po� RMso ev )Coo • I _ r 4 THE ALL BE D :FAP F5 PTY F" THE BUILDING GW PENDING CITED AS VIEW OREGONIIIAN PATH EN BLE SURFACES, 5 ALL AMOUNTED AND PROPERTY AN MERGPPLE ER CONSTRUCTION THE RMANTAINED IN A CAPE OP",. SHALL BE FREER'OFDEBRIS. HAVEN AND WALEGES ✓ v " SITE KEY NOTES R uy TINED N A pA PERLY °Irvc naFAsrv�auµo icREw O SITE ENTRY aExAxoNA MA. s HAw PErvCE. 1 I - _........__ ,FAOEMENi"ClE[ANCE (SEE CIVl4)"- ❑z LANDSCAPE (SEE LANDSCAPE)auLsxL reun Tco`mH"FRuxia:aoow" GROANING PER SVoBAR�cl. CO 2012 ON Ell HE ,(RHAL ❑3 EXISTING PARKING LOT PAVING 8. LIPS PROJECT SCOTT HE PROTECTED BY A CONSTRUCTOR >FrvcE AUD HULL COMPLY wrtry 1 3 13 THE DRS k BMP R RwEN15 (SAND BA6 CHECKCORRECTION I ® PAINTING cuR9 s. CIE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT "DS ALERrSAD' HEAD rvo M Po� RMso ev 12 • I _ r 11 THE LCULLY AUDI IFECK. IMAGENTIOD . CONTACT DIG RT BY SWUNG F5 NEW CURB (SEE CIVIL FOR DETAILS) s11 OR THEIR SENSE AT wwxnlwLCRT.ORG. q : EASEMENT CLEGAm (SFE CML) 10, ASSUREDAT LEAST O © EXISTING FIRE HYDRANTS PAR PRIOR TATANY — �e _ 1:• ALL THECOMP TYP. 1 9" B 1 10 d ORDEWORKERS vKIM COMPENSAFF TION ED AT WORKMAN [] PROPERTY LINE m STEER. LICENSED c°INSURANCE GLANCESIS ANY TO TH5 APPROMm AIDS CLASS ❑e TO BE REMOVED COURSE OF CONSTRICHAN SMALL BE APPROVED By THE GUY PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WHO ANY 9\ 7 g STANDARD PARKING SPACE 9'X IR IN. 10 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE 9' K 19MIN, 11 DESIGNATED PARKING SPACE 9' X 19' MIN. 12 WHEEL STOP RYA.) E3 TRANSFORMER (SEE MEP) 1y SHORT TERM BICYCLE RACK e 0 BIKE RACK) 15 LONG TERM BICYCLE PARKING PARK -A -BIKE 0301V LOCKERS 16 ENTRY SIGNAGE ADJADEA,NT BUILDING NG 20,571 SF� 15 15 OF PL 10 � 3'-6 1/2- (VERIFY WITH CW L) ccc���lll PL 1571 3/4" (VENF1' WILD sv� ya"-(VEHm' wren CML) T6o._a' RD ON MIN SIOE SFO .. _ - - - - _ PA. 110-0' BUILDING WIDTH 5._6• 26-0, 19'_0' I9'-0, 2 w • - - - - - - - - - LOi LINE USTII C�GNZ-_ 0 1J PRE RISER 10 NEW PROPOSED FIRE HYCRANi 19 ADA DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE (ARROW 70WARD MIN ENTRANCE) za DCDA - TO BE SCREENED BY IS (SEE CINL FOR MORE INFO) 21 (W CIVILBFOR MOYRE INFO) ENED LS 22 R—.II- WALL iD /s\: :,,"I 19'-0" =34= _ 33 32 31 30 ,1L. eVDL 28._____ �P 27 TY 26 FEB1]%9 A ♦ 15 • _ _ I"-lOw 5 uu1 ;I 1 I - _........__ ,FAOEMENi"ClE[ANCE (SEE CIVl4)"- 14 f_ 2 14 CO 2012 ON W, DATEDCOCT.HECK 11, ^ FRONT SETBACK" " III 1 1 3 13 - NR F9OXTSEF4d 9 w�,O CHECKCORRECTION I a l J � 4.- o ,9-0 12 • I _ r I 2—STOR B 1 , o . _ q : EASEMENT CLEGAm (SFE CML) " " " 1,y 1 3 I. — �e _ TYP. 1 9" B 1 10 d I y e B 1� 4 ED CIT 9n IrtwaL�Y _e 9\ 7 ARE �1 6 n w® _ _ .. .. I SCRIPT WITH TVI =---------------- 0 1J PRE RISER 10 NEW PROPOSED FIRE HYCRANi 19 ADA DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE (ARROW 70WARD MIN ENTRANCE) za DCDA - TO BE SCREENED BY IS (SEE CINL FOR MORE INFO) 21 (W CIVILBFOR MOYRE INFO) ENED LS 22 R—.II- WALL iD /s\: :,,"I 19'-0" =34= _ 33 32 31 30 ,1L. eVDL 28._____ �P 27 TY 26 O 35 1 SITE PLAN n CD/A :REACTIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES Ytlimcwre.Indrvr DeigrE Phnninp TmRUCTURm RemnlselT¢ 1]IOERVMrM9[ Gry�MEMPA GERE, m..M� :WyNRN®er cre:rcrewt¢,AMATav, CIO BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER WERE ED COS WON WAS OMMEMONG"W911N mnm: BREA CANYON INVESTMENT, LLC sa,. �DARGy,�l\ �m .\ i �FO, 17TT1�f OrewinB TINA: SITE PLAN (LOT I) ARAl,,AIAR RIA FEB1]%9 A ♦ e LL �0 9 a2LE,, `�� T.Ps, _ ___ - o � ' nS -EY 9 ae. ry CO 2012 ON ZP�STAN DATEDCOCT.HECK 11, Y M CHECK CORRECTION XLPIAN DATED DEC. 20. 2012 CHECKCORRECTION zP3PLAN A, I a l J III � ASPLAN 5 . 49. v _ --4IN 16 17 18 GN 20 21 22 23 24 - 25 EASEMENT CLEGAm (SFE CML) " " " r _ I y e 1 IrtwaL�Y ARE AC n REvvCNTwL FULL G TO THE BOOTH TYP. PL 1J4'—l0 1/3 (VERIFY WI1N CML) PL 120'-3 3/4" (VERITY WITH CIVIL) 10 WASHINGTON STREET O 35 1 SITE PLAN n CD/A :REACTIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES Ytlimcwre.Indrvr DeigrE Phnninp TmRUCTURm RemnlselT¢ 1]IOERVMrM9[ Gry�MEMPA GERE, m..M� :WyNRN®er cre:rcrewt¢,AMATav, CIO BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER WERE ED COS WON WAS OMMEMONG"W911N mnm: BREA CANYON INVESTMENT, LLC sa,. �DARGy,�l\ �m .\ i �FO, 17TT1�f OrewinB TINA: SITE PLAN (LOT I) ARAl,,AIAR RIA FEB1]%9 IDGIR A ICA I -EY ae. s CO 2012 ON ZP�STAN DATEDCOCT.HECK 11, CHECK CORRECTION XLPIAN DATED DEC. 20. 2012 CHECKCORRECTION zP3PLAN A, RATED FEB. 11, 2D13 CHECK CORRECTION ASPLAN DATED MAR. C 2011 "'A" �: AS -101 3/4, _r /I��--FREI P.M SELLS Q AL, PAVING CONCRETE PAVING w/ GROOVE WARNING 4RIPs iD DETECTABLE STRIPS @ CROSSWALK 02" HT. �— TAPERED AT EDGE AIDED EXPOSED M—rn s—IF. a -B G�- O DETECTABLE DOMES @ CROSSWALK WALLMOUNTUGHTTOUGHTUP THE LONG TERM BIKE LOCKERS THE SIGN SHALL B[ POSTED IH A INEIRLLDOUS PUCE AT EARN ENTRANCE TD THE CFF -STREET PARKING STALL WE SYMBOL SPECIFIED ABUSE SEALL CONSIST OF A WHITE ERROR ON A BLUE BACKAGAIM. THE BWE SELL BE ECUAL TO COLOR NO, 15MO IN FmERIt STANDARD 595B O HANDICAP PARKING SYMBOL NOTE THESE DIAGRAMS ILLUSTRATE THE SPECIFlG FLOW SUMMERS OF THESE REGULATIONS AND ARE INTENDED ONLY A: AN All FOR BUILDING DESIGN AND NEWDECA)'. STATE OF CAHFORI CONSTRUCTION, DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION) SEE RCP FOR LOCATONANDMFE - FORCONNEENTEMORDERED i LONGMIEMBINE PARKING BINE LOCKERTUrr TEACH) PAR.REIKE%SOIV LOCHER6 , R 5 13 ENLARGE PLAN ACCESS. ENTRYFROM HAND, STALL O LONG LANCE TERM BIKE PARKING ELEVATION m in11 TYPICAL CMU BLOCK (RETAINING) WALL , WNGTERMBIKEPARYJNG BIKE LOCKER (FRS I EACH) n PARKAKIKEKSTELOCKERB I I I I E I L I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I OLONG TERM BIKE PARKING PLAN .1 OC1— NOTE: THE WASHED 1 LINES ARE SHOWN TO INDICATE MINIMUM OWNS SPACE NO CLOTH TERA RE PARKING PAINT REQUIRED U -STYLE LEAN BM BIXE PACK F E 21 BISKN MCD I' LB FI1C LL E¢E T, uWEE K O SHORT TRM BIKE PARKING U ARKIN( ONLY CD/A CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES AfdiNecMa. INSaNx Oesgn. PSI T.�BSIBnIOI F�Bi"'. TERM E Nm4MR MEN. UMeARMEME WLR L�ewRAlNnyuemlYem�w,A.,omm, ma P LOP0 BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER MECTCR¢EC SIGH 7I cANSTRUCIED OF PCRGELEN STEEL WITH yoBRFAUNYOE. .."WEEK SPADED TEST BR EQUAL FEE. 11P nWW:ST SOP BINE BACKGROUND WITH ARM LATER Ano TENT, BINE SMALL BE FEDERAL sTANKEI 5958 COLO' ?FS GK MR184Ttl P NOTED B iml. I. SMR TO BE CENIE'ED AT 'HE INTERIOR END OF PARKING SPACE. 2. AREA OF 9cry TO BE A BREA CANYON INNICHHE°�P'o sounBE INVESTMENT LLC a ELSONATE FOR 'SAN ACESENER E'WHERE 1'4 APPROPRIATE 4. ISE WALL ADMITTEDSIGNS'! S IHSTuo of ma . zr.; •. F:<e HAN 7I O FEE. 11P nWW:ST SOP ?FS GK MR184Ttl P M'M4 YEfM lv EEL END (�oxco us[Eson) ♦'-0' a 5N#E 54LL 6'd 0 VLeIF S1NL 1'4 NP15t 6YITaR MkLL SIV 4' NAOI RECE1 P xs (oxwxrnnE swFACFs NN[ EPowp O PRECAST WHEEL STOP 2E 1. DELFT IF O HANDICAP PARKING AT LOCA71ONS(BEE SHE PUN FOR LOCMU.NM HI SIGN BEEOEUMI Dra wln9 1111 e: -B FT SQUARE RESSITE DETAILS SYMAGLSEEDErAIL 5 4' WIRE BLUE STRIPING BLUE SHALL BE FEDERAL STANDAF SEEN CDLOR 1FLUM PR.) RADIUS PM.) BACKDRDUND WDH .FIGURE AND NTNG BLUE SHALL BE PAT SANDARD BEER B "PRE 'CGR¢ED SLD TOWED VEHF1Es MAr ESE WRLEW imSTED£L A. RE CIA AT SPADED FEST OR SOLVE 0R BYI TELEPHONING APPROPRTUTE (TWS,,h n¢ NL.b,,) INFORMATION MUST BE NCUDON SIGN (MINIMUM OF -For" 1IN WORT) NOTETHE SIGN SRALL BE PDSTEC IN A CONSPILVOVS PUCE AT FALX ENIRWCE io THE GEF -STREET P ARM NG FALINr. OR IMMEDIATELY PUNGENT tU AND NBIRLE FROM :PCH 5TKL OC BPMF, RE NVF tFSs THAN 9Y12" IN ME WITH LETTERING NOT LEAs THAN T N DRUNK. ASD STAFF THE muawwC vRAU;HDRrzm EFFECTS PARKED IN DESIGNATED ACGFsselE sPFC6 xCT olsFunxG oLSRxou6HIN0 PUUNDs aR ucENSF PuiEs ISSUED FDR PEW'oxs AM BEISRECWYED AT GAdd sE) AOR BY TEELEPHHOSNIEDPEN eph.Dne Exumw`'Tf5 O SIITEENTRYSIGN LOA Profe[ Ne 'M e: EE41.IO11 NA, L a. :LDP PUN CHECK REC➢ON 1 oAM OCT. 11,COR2AI2 22\ PUN CHECK CORRECTION MTED DEC. 20, 2012 QPLAN CHECK CORRECTION 3 DATED FEB. 11, 20F3 A5PWJ CHECK CORRECTION DATED MAR, 8, 2013 C e IAB Nv AS -102 RAMP AND HANDRAIL GENERAL NOTES HANDRAIL PRODUCT: DESIGNRAIL-RAILING SYSTEMS 6. DIGITAL LEVEL NOTE FOR ALL ADA PAVING: RAI LING WITH HORIZONTAL CABLE IN FI LL COMPLIANCE OF ADA SLOPES ON CONCRETE AND ASPHALT AS STATED ON THE PIANS SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE STATEKS 1. ALL HANDRNLB SHALL ALWAYS BE CONTINUOUS AND THE REPRESENTATIVE UTILIZING A 24 INCH DIGITAL LEVEL. THE N ENDS OF HANDRAILS SHALL BE EITHER ROUNDED OR INCH DIGITAL LEVEL WILL BE SUPPLIED BY THE STATE AND RETURNED SMOOTHLY TO THE FLOOR, WALL OR POST HOEG SHALL BE CALIBRATED BY THE STATE'S REPRESENTATIVE 1133B.5.5.1) PRIOR TO THE TAKING OF ANY MEASUREMENTS, MEASUREMENTS HALL BE TAKEN IN ANS DIRECTION WITH THE 2. THE GRIP PORTION SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 1114'NOR MORE 241NCX DIGITAL LEVEL AND MEASUREMENTS TAKEN SHALL THAN 1H2 IN GROSS SECTIONAL NOMINPL DIMENSION, OR THE COMPLY WITH THE SLOPE SPECIFIED ON THE PIANS. SPACE SHALL PROVIDE AN EQUIVALENT GRIPPING SURFACE, CONCRETE OR ASPHALT WORE THAT DOES NOT MEET THE ANO ALL SURFACES SHALL BE SMOOTH WITH NO SHARP REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE CONSIDERED NONCOMPLONNT CORNERS. HANDRAILS SHALL NOT ROTATE WITHIN THEIR AND WI LL NOT BE ACCEPTED BY THE STATE. ANDY AREA WHICH FITTINGS (OBC 1133855.1) IS NON-COMPLIANT SHALL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED ATTHE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 3. HANDRAILS PROJECTING FROM A WALL SHALL HAVE A SPACE OFI117 BETWEEN THE WALL AND THE HANDRAIL (DUG 11338.55.11 A. HANORAILS MAY BE LOCATED IN A RECESS IF THE RECESS IS A MAKER UM OF 3" DEEP AND EMENDS AT LEAST PIG ABOVE THE TOP OF THE RAZE (LBC 1133D.5JC1) B. ANY WALL OR OTHER SURFACES ADJACENT TO HANDRAILS SHALL BE FREE OF SHARP OR ABRASIVE ELEMENTS, EDGES SHALL HAVE A MIN. RADIUS OF FIT (DEC 1131 4, WHERE THE RAMP SURFACE IS NOT SOUNDEDBY A WALL, THE RAMP SHALL COMPLY BULLISH (A) HAVE A GUIDE CURB A MIN. 2" IN HEIGHT SHALL BE PROVIDED AT EACH SIDE, OR BO HAVE A WHEEL GUIDE GAIL(OBC 113385.5) 5. RAMPS MORE THAN 30' ABOVE THE ADJACENT GROUND SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH GUARDS THAT COMPLY WITH DEC 1813. SUCHGUARD SHALL BE CONTINUOUS FROM THE TOP OF THE RAMP TO THE BOTTOM OF THE RAMP. (DEC 113385]) ` SEE CIVIL FOR ELEVATION HEIGHTS YKS k_ "'AND" Ila rc u1MwN ALaMox 1SAWAR 'APS PAl pX x0.rNu LAMB yµ TPip�p ) IRtNxIXC UN,AEt WALL &aB T7 -- XC 4PN[1 =TW MW I :III IEPIDMANDCAL IIIIIII TIL I I I brRT° O TYP/a RAMP SECTION O LEFT ELEVATION/SECTION-ACCESSIBLE RAMP O RIGHT ELEVATION/SECTION-ACCESSIBLE RAMP O VIEW FROM PARKING LOT- ACCESSIBLE RAMPACCESSSIBLE RAMP wus PEu ✓ v ✓V v v.' ✓ .AMAEOPErzs ✓ v. u N v o ✓ v .✓ W J� O VIEW FROM WASHINGTON STREET -ACCESSIBLE RAMPACCESSSIBLE RAMP v v = v HANDRAIL ON v - v ✓ V v ,� z1� BCH SIDE OF 6 s v, 1HE RAMP WITHV r v ✓ v T CODE CBN� �` v v BOTTOM v a xw e 'oM AEL FAMP 3UAFACE IS SU BE ICFIRM FIAM, AND SUP n TI HE 481 Pryv p MAKE DRE WE SURFACE IS t 5-T a FINISHED WAi NO WATER ALAN 135E WILfW CEIAIL51 1 U�eve ONE MOI" 6EECMi BEWM --L t O ENLARGE PLAN OF ACCESSIBLE RAMP FROM WASHINGTON STREET -'C H,..., y .-.. �.. .. L N y IT y .v v ✓ w10IT y K Al, v V Xi vis B Top IM RNDNG�v W V C,15-: LANDING s k INTERMEDIAR ,✓ RAMP UP 112 reAMP uP 11z LANDING Jw ro ry v J� J� ✓ v v ✓ .. v _ v v w v v ✓ v ti4 P wus PEu ✓ v ✓V v v.' ✓ .AMAEOPErzs ✓ v. u N v o ✓ v .✓ W J� ✓ w v v = v HANDRAIL ON v - v ✓ V v ,� z1� BCH SIDE OF 6 s v, 1HE RAMP WITHV r v ✓ v T CODE CBN� �` v v BOTTOM v xw e 'oM AEL FAMP 3UAFACE IS SU BE ICFIRM FIAM, AND SUP n LANDING I g DAN,NN 2 Pryv p MAKE DRE WE SURFACE IS t 5-T a FINISHED WAi NO WATER ALAN 135E WILfW CEIAIL51 1 U�eve ONE MOI" WILL BE ACCOMULPEO O ENLARGE PLAN OF ACCESSIBLE RAMP FROM WASHINGTON STREET CD/A :REATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES MPH...Irlmr Pr Di PINNI, T.GBBr38101 F..... "MUSTAwoe3L gryMIMUPy,GAXB vi.'m'.edsneo-m opyrrpM09y frtsfire0esipnPsravka,Mc role c/: BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER SAICAGNYONhWB COUSEEARCA9'S aienr. BREA CANYON INVESTMENT, LLC :_.ronuwJsmsEr s,ak> ms "9i0,"EN.mavT'� LF� OF pS� Orawln9 ilfle! SITE DETAILS BOA J 1211 0 F 1IV1a P6 FL4NN NGF 0 .0 Tut Rrt ie 1QPUN CHECK CORRECTION DATED OCT, 11, 2012 PLAN CHECK CORRECTION 2 DATED DEC. 20, 2012 QPIAN CHECK CORRECTION 3 DATED FEB. 11, 2013 PLAN CHECK CORRECTION 5 MUFF MAR 8, 2013 Brewing N^: AS -103 SURVEY MAP e xxx aux Inx FE1WL\ :� SSs.ecT \�-is5a `\ SIGV4E fIL6M ;\ (55� l♦ y♦1 ../G PM.. -ry 0 Y WEN pWX NXK FQICE 1♦.♦ ♦♦ XTL'i]w ]b.1 t♦ ♦ ♦♦ Y11di a•YlN_I, \0e ♦11�1vL`Y>:i`�\•11LLSL♦3^Y.iN.lii)L�23i�♦`3-'3$•ii�11`�♦ ♦\N�i1::d'.- • (55 \ 5.96 20 40 /S}a.Es) �p�E iMwl / - R. �5.5.e6J '''si 1]•MOE Ax _________ R 55A]6 TC 55£52 1 °-20' F 55426) \L(55s 46rnR- \'x3w 120558. ---------- -55].OpJ F536.9j____________ __ f893) IR`K YYYYY 55633 ) (!`( \\ s' wEH awx IaK F 1 �\� \\ "'� P"°^ .47 FAL vuvE \ I I� 1 \ \ (558.1]11566 u .]t) \ \ \ PUEE \ (ss ( Ai01} '°EF(sn.6s) pv"Ec�Xxq TMECa rRE I 6se) (s6 \ \\ \ (556.2] }fim) ,FSS ixal rr % \ 12'.sss.v) BUILDING IS 20,577 S.F.IPar_ \\l,\ y\ WtlYAP 56 TC 550 sOx) '� E• xKil w.L FRME 5H ttN 6f RET. WNL \ \ \ 1 �s4 k IµpylPE ,C 558 B> 880) 6, g 5 \ 1\�\\ g•�\� ® �],d�I��,)�(556.58) __-_ FS(55_I9)- Y0]6 63.1.1 (s58 s5) III GENERAL NOTES: If I tbl 1. SURVEY OF THE SITE IS PROWDED TO VERIFY \ IM p \ ♦I. vrLYE ss@@bb5556 is THAT THE EXISTING BUILDING S 20.5)) S.F. PER \ •�1� \ �� Fs ssss, , REQUEST IAM OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR PLANNING uWR P3� \---------------- , DEPARTMENT. \\FS(563 ]9) FASENENT NOTES: \ � \ Fn \ 1 1. CENTERLINE OFWIDE EASEMENT TO WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, PER S(85 -1124!K54, \ \ \\ \ q I 1 IN. N0. 85-1111 24534. REC'0 SEPTEMBER 26. 1985. O.R. IL b62Be) I 6'fi6) 1 1 T. 10' WIDE EASEMENT TO SCG COMPANY, PER INST. 20111174009, RECD \ \\ \\ AUGUST 23. 2010, O.R. 3. 5.5' WIDE EASEMENT TO CRY OF INDUSTRY. PER INV. NO. 20110483144, RECD \ 1 MARCH 31, 2011. \ \ \♦'\\Tf y24• xF. GY WEkF\» 9NIrt ax 4WYJN6 5R])u) / \ n V ♦ 56 � 55..18 I WL pyM1 u6xr �c � WEx 65.46) e) 691 Ss=�wmxwE2s55 \ 5'5 655_10 TC 336.1♦ 4 �eJpv}♦ 5 \ N 0. Aryl F5 s5t.]i t• Rdl W.1. FEXA� \ ♦)1"5H4 H `- PA. WUE VN. C S562a \ q•1 Rq CF RET. WNL N i 1659.91) F55590x ��- eaE � HwM 2569.89)-\ 55995 \ 5 0 \c - XP51'HM 31a.BN - i<56t.31 R 5k85 SBA 1\RS9 � �-G SURVEYOR'S NOTES: \ �_ __y)jp9E,pE�= _ -_ \ � _ _ _ 1. ALL INMRIVIATIOGENERALLY SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ISE BUT AS THE BEST PRESENT ACCURACY. AND PERFORMED __Z -___-------------_ CWITHINONDI GENERALLY ACCEPTED ENGINEERING PRACTICE BUT WITHOUT GUARANTEE OF ACCURACY. WHERE ACTUAL \ - = _ _ --_-__------- --- CONDITIONS CONFLICT WITH THE DRAWINGS, THEY SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE ENGINEER SO THAT THE PROPER (559 55(.90 PA, BT,I ]6• gAyNK M(5 5556) 1C 5355341 .. WOULD REPRESENT SUCH PRECISE CONDITIONS. WHICH OBVIOUSLY ARE NOT POSSIBLE. Ew9Yl THE NUMBER OF SUCH FIELD MEASUREMENTS ARE THEREFORE UMITED TO THE SCOPE AND INTENT OF THE _ RESULTING MAP. 3. THE BOUNDARY SHOWN HEREON HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED WED ON THE RECORD DATA. i .53021 REFYIHE \ LEGAL DMCRIPRON: PARCELS 1 k 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 10840, IN THE CITY OF DIPMOND BAR. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. STATE \ \ OF CALIFORNIA. AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 101. PAGES 74 TO 75 OF PARCEL MAPS. IN THE COUNTY RECORDER OFFICE OF SAID COUNTY. \ APN: 5719-010-901 k 8719-010-902 \ BENCHMARK: \ U COUNTY BM G 47M \ DPW BM TAG IN N CB 1FT W/O BCR NW COR BREA CYN RD h LYCOMING ST \ ELEVATION: 582.852' IM ^1� IN4R II "e) 6' MXM aOLK W.YL IML \E � � R 55� t1 Wrarvw ,v.v ) �6]-76f 1��]1,) WtlSUYS 1vve.]3) (Yv}S.BB) pp,ya R55tD5) I I R P- iC 555.]8 40 I R 55 t.450J p/1YYYII I I I s56.69 / �' St 21\ I. III FS Ss62) n� / _YW�VAL\E iC 553.39 p555d'.IB ,vb.SJ) \�1'O) ,a �639L. VN45tlPE SIC"�) � FL 5s2.tE I I nMy555� � � R556s2 ] 1J) I �1�� IRR. WllE 558.0] \ W I IFMi WMF \ yw� 5525E vaL V/iYi ElHgW11h' % 551.76I I 0.55564 III ,5) I J I jl II 26RRLW Pa- �Ifi) III 1111 yry 1 wu m �'I I iRw. vux 116X` IIPoE I' I s9ea] 115) I B5 'EI) (555.93 III I i i y�11 IRRL VILYE ]) 11 1 1 R� 1 I �� l� 1�R11r-iIlIl II \`� _ _ lull 1, 11111= 111 555.93 iC 556.98 ) i 91! C(55b.1 x) iS(566.11 I Ili¢ 16 FL W6.06 9z)q- A�v ILII ( jll li ill llllit I II �,Illll Ill gllli� i I iii If I''I�III I� SII I i F ,101111 1111 �l i I ) ..Eje7111 1111 III i 6.N1 ypUyllI111 i1il II pN6 IO Illi i `\ II 11�IBjili(fill Ibo) \\ II I�I,�III11O IFlsr uWR $ "J ///// vuvE \ I I1 11 I1 11 ISQi pl � ' I�11�1111 � lsxx `'"lam / \\. 111��Ij�lj�ljl II III � 881 s�6 I I p6x___ ___________________________ l,p 5,1.]9 =w_594.]9) � I __ _J�i T4NK��IMFWIKE _'1C / iE 5.4.91 METK BLmrCANYON ROAD BflCR RW M1 yR.RF M53].0 RRL Bmt n sw.4, I I 1P.�iFIC LIMI! 16) LXE Ruw I uRX I I I I 24>) w -mu F W W SHEET 1 OF 1 SHT. PRI SY. N 0 7 2067 CALK LED, RCE EERIN CAL LAND EE ENGINEERING, INC. ROAD. TENTATIVE TRACT . o z o 576 E. UAIIISERT QI'I IIIIII VIII IIIIII I BREA. CA 992821 TEL (714) 671-1050 FAX: (]14)8]1-1090 III n I' S DRAINAGE CONCEPT/SUSMPOWNER'�` ' yro+l� c pu l l IIIIII I I z w 'I �^ uxmss oIx[ams[ Wf � ill ¢ iI >'vl°AxAUAmE£5 gyp, /N THE .CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, COUNTY OF COS ANGELES ... BREA CANYON INVESTMENT. LLC'I 17528 E. ROWTAND STREET. /288'' Cnv OF INDUSTRY, CA 91748 (626) 913-8939 I' IIII�11 IIIIIIIII 'i�III If IIII 'I 5$g II IIII IIIA IIII ylle 4 -STATE OF CALIFORNIA PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 16640, IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. STATE OF I �'^FMN•v m wrI AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOR PAGES 74 TO 75 PARCEL MAPS, IN THE COUNTY RECORDER ❑�� (N TEST) 'fntli 60 W z L_ Q til 1�1II II I IT III N i _ T CALIFORNIA, v OFFlCE OF SAID COUNTY. Iv'+i OFFICE COUNTY. _ N IIII IIIIIIIII I 2 PaaPERn IMFDaMAnDw IIII IIII IIII D > FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES P r ZONE: O-P APN: 8719-010-901 LOT SIZE: 42,333 2 SO. FT (0.97 AC) NO. OF EXISTING UNR(Sf. 0 [x ;Ic CCII oll IIII IIII mmI IIII IIII u --- —I �' y oscAP[ — `r — — — a B uuoscwE -' 6 _— — — — — A /,1(,1�J ' _ 'P^ .� u Ex I'll m 51 N% 3 Y. n �..1 - N0. OF PROPOSED UNIT(S): 11 NO. OF STORY(IES):2 N0. OF PPRKING(5): PROPOSED 37 EX. SEWERAGE DISPOSAL BY GRAVITY SEWER PIPES TO SEWER MAIN QI Q ;[(55::5)�/yI'I II .IIII IIII III vLlsans:)I II .,.Ili l III p ,- CP III A r y% m IIII I' li{i�{'4iLpQ, IT RANT AS, plomtt INE �' —(5561 a ?.',' I RlEn mru uNR aF �� : �'S/5 ®ITC 559.5)) AOJISNEHi 2 S' NRCT Si.W (n ssaofil N9RE'31'w sore sARyn uNE� Q _ \ N' ry sx [x uuT —555 312.00' c Jj N b WN p o m N 09111 h � �N8936'55"E mi( 5 3]W) N89'36'S5"E 103.5 PULL 6ax (Es 5591e 'EII.IpRI. vAL To 6[ LR11L - _ - - _ _ - [_ POC[ _ __� , _ _ _ - fx ucxT p YL 55a n) m To e[ ft[LoT_Ea 2 Q sss.rzl - 1c'�.M9 •T a _ _ � 551.I1O - - - fRW 1Y1� pdIRN/' �l V S d III U' o ��INgggP k��1, I� vi llul. a x(555) k TS 55175) ( 51x I. OR LH IPPI. VALVE ipy E� A", y b UTILITY SERJIC6: WATER - WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT SEWER - COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES SANITATION DISTRICT O E% I� O Id I l l! I RPAwxlx II 'I V �o a[aXtetp[[n TIN isa T5) N89'36 55"E 322.0011 is sss.ae) II . / - V ELECTRICAL -SOUTHERN CALImRNN EDISON CO. I uL p TNI Hass l y m101 XTAESs k [lAEtS F/SfXvlr iiv� / (I.xTO 10 .^,e 14X INST. misoofiwai, XFFb —In ®I } RELEASED TELEPHONE - GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY TIERIZON) Ix M[TAL u is ssa.s9) y7 GAB -THE GAS COMPANY z xAwrv65 4 I g I U 188 p 1MT aT ^ auloAXr lS. c.R. PA 3 IIII -`IIII-IIII # FIRE--LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT �1I 2 rg )( °OAs'� \ AON SHERIFF—LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF BENCH MARK: Q SC.W ,ps II IN II I hYAT6i III ti II / i — `. iL s5+ II 'II \ sewcur ux[ N_ k�/ A'sd wXl--�w II 5 g ( 16) 2 ��V Xm 1p�� VICINITYMAP �� IIIIIII WHIM VALK Cpl Ba I- 1 Ill a �� 3 • LA COUNTY BM G 4730 DPW BM TAG IN N CS 1FT W/O BCR NW COR BREA CYN RD Ix 111I zll IIII Ili II I / �O & LYCOMING 5T ELEVATION: 562.852' w N II �µ�A ( c� Ex WATER II I YYY"' eY, II I I I / ll178 a ml • is 55sxo) OI ➢ �I e �I / 4 9 #100 ®Pi�411 6ss.Tq ABBREVIATIONS/LEGEND: mIi ErfR I III III IIII I^pp I V 1 / FF 555.85 ° °�E9) 9 III W II a ° R REWBONB WALL ON ------- CAS METER CBI%....... CON NN.......... MAN HWE II II I G CI R) II HEI I I y m l uali PAD 555.113" " " • 73 fR IRRI RApNG -" 6' HART / W p y � 1 SAMWT I1XE RLOCN WALL '^ a AND G lhG........ CURB AND ARROM OTA__..._. IMEWAY APRON 9AH....... SEINER MANHIX£ g I {wo�� ry�q G5� N I �IP VAI NNI CT O1�(f$YSG! A I .� (iS 55556 TC yE.p %!N. s5al 4 �x1 \ 5 v 46N0 S SOEWAW OWY.�... DRIVEWAY /1� EP......_... EDISON POLE 4..._._.. STORM GRAM! NSLC W:fvMllr. R IIP Ippy9iT��I 65� 1 II �IAL61rio •. S LANDSCAPE 653591 " 55 Y wcur ux W ^ • Ex ucri�+ ©� (Tc 5$zq J EX.._....:. E4Sr T9R.......dO BE. RINI Fl4......._.. FRE HNMANT TG...._._. IDP OF CURB FIEVARCW FL......_.. FLOW UNE E ABON xF........ WOODEN FENCE L£............ LANDSCAPING WV...._... WATER VI ^ II �I � If I III [x sl I' II ft I n168 �I II • WW11EA s'A*a- 2 II x __-- -TR'�TI� #158 I --- PROPERTY LINE I II mIy' j'( �I Illlllll ae SS9i- I-®qy .g�i.6i II �Ir is esaz) E 15 Lm 1C .11 I ft 336.n0 I - (H ssa9 P Leax n c'TI B t tl I - - - - - EXISTING STRUCTURES S SEWER I TIX5'A o6) - V�I I II �n Pum "' N I \\\ ___ -__ - o _ 0 a o[oA _ _ _ _ T 55sgL/(D J -_-_ _�� _ - --- __ _ _ O I� pPROPOSED y - .DX - J sss: of:IT �y „ ii> �, II x IXRL-102 - E%SING CONTOURS eoR m l \\ CR"T A, - U �_� i(i_�--�1T sya rssI [L.ct5.69sm7ii GHEE'' IIIN") "j [swa I' T SSW � h,,._Ex NEW STRUCTURES DRAINAGE PATTERN it(s1Xz6) x _ IX IRAEFIi m Rm _'£ Q1P-sna-. _ wypEQPE- =T-(� Ilml. �' vofwALx yfs5o)-__ 1 �i6H9Y- 5 -- o s ss m ca T` iusnn(s959x) [LJ _ , T (u 6(= fY nc - :"At-N89 3D 55'23 00 -- - (� 5 1.65 VNK°�� _ ra ) 55°x O _ __ ygL=� h m(s5s e) H(ssx 1 TI(ss m) ( 1 [X 1R RAxP _ X PITT. cif/- 16) o) '� _ _1(}i EN 1RPfTl o a ucnT c(sal. _ tt _ T 55x5C 1 fx STJC(595.ax) iC(516.66) -TY [X Si(59992) VALK N'( 1 75.11' NYIIftAN[ ) ( ) *U �`9Y cxT )geaeT (sq L(6s r6 N85'48'12"E LIcxT n(savfi iL sw os hyo EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT TC(59o9q FL(s9n7s) .� R=146Q.00 Ex WATER Xoecsm N uETER UNIT OF GRADING N540 a:) PULL eoX NR[xRLTCE SOW 8 -97.13 H - �=3'48'43' llN1FXIINE OF WASXIXCiON STREET �— --- ____________- DRAINAGE PIPE - - _ — WASHINGTON STREET FIRST FLOOR LEVEL oCo Co 1D MAINTAIN MOW DRAINAGE KTI RIN - #286 IX TiF£ N016 0< w Q7 2 OSnm RID'EAMQIS' CURB BE REMIONAD O E) _ IMMIDI M9 AC P0.YF1a Xx & n.t S gAXGIS NFA : =1 IfAA'! NM1R9 rz89 i (DSWEET GUM TO REMAIN Z Q 0 30 PWROSED wN Bull _RF_pLW)ppypR #200 @14'-16' SWEET GUM, AND WILL BE REMOVED Z d' O O4 OCWTRILT Q!!B MRRN]Is AJ aa1 41 1IMFIJ N.I x PBRI NFA OB AD RR4B11 P6MMG STs ©10'-12' LONDON PLANE (PLATANUS ACERIFOUA); WILL BE REMOVED z CI _ U m O 05 Fmic�D SDAFR OFNI0.R #228 Q12'-14' LONDON PLANE (PLATANUS ACERIFOUA); WILL BE REMOVED p Q O m ABsSEAEA LAIEPAL F S .BS Q ®10'-12' LONDON PLANE (PLATANUS ACERIFOUA): TO REMAIN O - w O co © Fm AcsEB V-OJIIBt #208 (10'-l2' CALIFORNIA SYCAMORE, TO REMAINED �'[� o ED Q Z OL OFI PAHT.aFD HI ®14'-16' DEODAR CEDARS. CEDRUS DEODARA, TO REMAIN d Q Q 0 PROPOSED ORANGE TIRE ®12'-14' SWEET GUM, UQUIDAMBAR STYRACIFLUA, TO REMAIN #268 "pv�e1 4 r-�°i a oNAw a ® PROPOSED aMUCHBA9N RmAcl SIB.F nm ® PROPOSED RKKWNY GRNN #258 �I • q i SATs ® RFA RTANLm tYV1 xw.: scn,E. ® QTbITdIGR O.W �� FLENAME ® TB CPABQ SECOND FLOOR LEVEL ® DaslRc TiF4.5 ro ff IFAIOuID T- ® PmPrSEn Pp°D"AM DRE. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 72067 21. A Registered CA Rigin- shall submit o Grading Certificate to the City L In case of lmegmcy. ml NICK SUN al (626) 216-8315 GRADING GENERAL NOTES 2 A stand-by aew for mergmcy Nark dill be owpable at of time surfing to rainy swam I. All grading fialI comply with the provivons of Section 1803 no Appeal d of u wpr ( Cl 15 to April 15). N.., materia. shall be mvildtle an oke and alariplM at cmement IaadfiOna to fmHtmte rapid mnshucaw of emergency deuicw whm ran is re, Caafomla Bullaing Code (ofill and all amendments adapted by the City. L mmnent 2 All tied. ,rosin, wM slopes in excess of LIR shall comply with In. Hillside Management Grainance and shag typimuy not exceetl 2:1. 1 Faodan e a be ..g When roved b the k din dMew diphtn io Thas p m may app 9 PA 555.18 before occupancy of buildings will be slowed. e One grading operation has progrewM to Ua pant Where they ere no Imgv f On 3. He din shoe comroww until a dm t ryas been Iswed b Me GET gra 9 gra 9 panni Y Y Pa fnepsped. eWbed of BiamSntl Bor. Ear FINE OlAlsoAE5 ARE W 4 All Ill slo w Poll be -,acted to no\ Ives than 90 percent of fine s p ' A a Use site mmdv most drain awe ham leaded areas M cent W fill dE w If wtM t Y P p D the tap of Buse d file cvn<luaon of mch waMg soy maxnmum density v a part of Lois grading plan and all moomme ddiima contained trams chap be Am 5 6uffident tuts of soil ro ata InGutln sop team Pat shear sDen Ms shall p p 9 Yp 9 S besides Within 24 hors after wch rainstorm All sit and dark Small he ham dl aM be sae Muc rotl'n re fa vert cam Manse da n sheds The 9 9 9 P fy P 9 .,ant.,`=iwt..,.,wamnmTALO and be d ofproperty.. dispwa n be in the final on -grand results o1 such testing shall be (preporW ll... City.report , or ,d by be Apsl'cant er his testae) or upon request d the Clry. A m n mum 8. A guard ¢hap posed the a W xhmam the depth soler my deem exceeds n rob« of rda eta ty team ow to be rime fdlgws. seas. is de f rn r after mch m nalorm. Iwo feet The dedce Hall be &ones or pumped dry a one test for each two loot, Im t. .summer... FRIEREnb. ^m I-P.mme.o =r l ms must Pumping and drain ng of OR basnw and drainage dewwa moat comply with apprapnaW wcm b One fat for mch iW0 cubo cards of -_ RXp stakes fa dewolermg apadiona c A sufficient numb« of farm slope \vets to rents mmpacban of IM1e slope tests to wel prem Wplano liance with development cond111 ns and for pW y nonfarm nc with Cry StandardcomrovAl AN Evans 7. Evcgt an oUa im apprmed by f11e ( dog Inspector. of m ow le Dmmdfiw dwicw 6. No illi All be placed until berl,mg of vegetative, removal of unsuitable soils, M Hear xmnluwre, or - allows shell be In plum at the end of each =Wing day a m neexmds when the 5 -day and Imulki tan of subdaiin (If nudes) is accepted by the soils engineer or 0. m con prcbabiity finemst umeds 41 engineers, geolagisl 8 At Imm was and debris which may owls a D ecamN W aH-ske pmPeRY slat be T. No NI acre be placed until the placement of esion control measure for the FF 555.855.1 ne, Ins ranorl i ham the site as tlnedM by Ua Gading Inaimlor. Arabs is accepted by the City. mL cmRwlas PAD 555.18 an Want forty-eight (40) hours in adwn<e of intention to begin grading. 27. Cmdm shall comply wM the CdNWm1a Stolt Water Bast Management 9. The placement of addl➢md de to Produces Ca51an damage wAhin file As Is left W B. The undersigned Civil Engineer hereby stated that these plans were preparN ttl the prajad's Standard Urbvn Storm Wafer Mitigation Plan the d'Isadan of UB Reid Engineer. by him or under his suyervlsion and that the plana conrm kto op pertsent CUT (SUSIe egnieme (SUSMPJ wquiramentc as neceumy. rano paMoua arta. 28. Street all rooftop➢ to provisions of section 1003, Excawtlon, Grading, and nil and Appendix E. Grading Of the Coliform. Building Cade (2010). 10. Deakin basins may not be Tenowd or mode inop Ne between Now by i and Apr] We me Grading Inroad., ACI FE RCE 49570 1/22/2013 _ _ 15 d e fdlmrng year, without mpmW of Registered Engineer R.CE. Data it. mied waw and lana ErwiOn Eanird disease ora to be modified as neMM as to p M poor p 9. Approved measures and temporary semina,¢ shall be of Ww Changed must be submitted Bar approwl w requNetl. material M obat adjoining Imp of material or diverted aftir properties fiat umtect d chrositlan Aowa boo during and its all proses of most coon. Filmbe 12 Ada One fallownq noteA'a eimBa) to The Ross to define the current state of 19 All ant. amvemems but be mmpmted to the satlenstim of the City lard ®LoProTN mndmetim. Engineer KrIStar Enterprises Inc w-- W so SWrrr1 stns and Eaton basins ere (no() Cm96i1CtBd. 1t Rough Gmdsg cerlfimb most be sones by Sons and Our Hones of SHALLOW CATCH BASIN b. Streets are (nut) paved, erupt as D. W an to emelt .Fl l plan. retard and approved by the City lmayector prim to issuance of Buffing perrus. a Nine, dewl are (opt) mnahualed, except ere np M m plana. 12 All vets shall be observed by the engineering geologist during grading m Mat 13 Slamwaler pollution gimbal requirements must be Integrated into the Emden COntrd any adverse tnatmans can be retgnlzea one corrected, pima per This 26. Swint 7010 of the County Cade for and, ..hCUOn bd.. October 11 Any mWlifecal of, ar changed In, approved groat,, plan mint be approved by the City 14. 15 pod April 15. Every effort dmdd be made W dm 1 Ue diedlage of nm-almmwota hon Me proped stle °t all kms. id All gradM sow must have dralnoge swats berms, and other drainage 15 Devdapem/caibadarc are r gmabfig to I aped Erw m Cmboi OW. ad rnaW dard- a,p,.d at the roll grad&,, stage t mm BMF'> ere Installed! and Wnct ann9 pmDMY al all Nmee 15. No rack or annaar material greater than K In diameter well be placed In the fin Unless recommendations for such placement have been submitted by the sails ESTIMATED PERIOD FOR COMPLETION Of GRADING: engt,ee End aVpOead Ia advance by the dry. GRACING MLL STAR: MAY 15, 2013 TO BE COMPLETED BY: OCTOBER 31, 2013 16. aaamg operations must be conducted ander the mntlnuous Waerwtbn of the sans engseer and/or the ifinam«Ing goo ls\ of record. DRAINAGE N01E5: 17. &Eawtims for Mabllty case and remoml of moll sons must be 1. Flow lines m sets mdam shot haw a minimum iS daps and fight linea On Ian&mpe observed one accepted is III by the sods moss m ugineaing gEdA,RE of tame shat& be a minimum 2S dap recortl He, to He plasm, of fill. 2 Concede antl Undampe awe adpemt to the building stat& be at a 2% rob elope and 18. The sole engineer and/err engineering geologist of record must document and mm 20% Jape Jdni ca away tram the Building. ( See NEW 'AN) accept rough grodln9 by Mal report prior to approwl by the City. The final reflect 1 Shin( flow and concrete wdme Will haw o m'mmum dope of 1% and At flow m &rod must include on aNgraded geotechnical map mope write ehd& haw a minimum dope of 2S 4. The flow time did& ber Imo d at a mnhnom Y frau to aide of me bulskg and 5' min. 19. The soils engineer and/or engineering geal5get of record must make E from Me uXding. back Of tob finding in accordanu wish Section III of the Los Islas County Bunning Cade far S Draining Onto ad)amt Property is rid permihW, the graded ske pub to approwl by the sty. 20. Foundation and/or wall aseavotions must be anerved and saepOd The writing by therWWage ml or engineering gtlogiet of record prior to plating 9061 t 21. A Registered CA Rigin- shall submit o Grading Certificate to the City SECTION A -A i g 'FCI.RR CHnRr Nrs Engineer no more than IC working days upon completion of final grading ed GE Sol SECTION C -C u wpr opemtione Certificate of Occupancy shall be Issued subject t5 the City Engineer's PROLES L G MNlr err pprowl of said Enginers CeNficote. final gmding must be oppround by Ne City PL °1 ,a PA 555.18 before occupancy of buildings will be slowed. easy W' *7L! Pa 22. me sone and Gedogy Report prepared by CAL LAND EN(ANE AIW, INC/ $E'^ Ear FINE OlAlsoAE5 ARE W ouARTECH CONSULTANTS one dome SETTEMBEA 2e 2012 all become -gipfinues. auu, a part of Lois grading plan and all moomme ddiima contained trams chap be Am SCADS r•xo' L sbldly adhered to. ME ROR TO Ei PMa+m roma mNAc .,ant.,`=iwt..,.,wamnmTALO 23. A copy of the gmding permit and approved grading plans must be in the ll... as pmxsian of a responsible person and owl at the site of rill thaw.. R I III seas. is 24. anal grading must be approved before occupancy of buildings will be pllowetl. BASIS OF BEARING .summer... FRIEREnb. ^m I-P.mme.o 25. These he. bet checked by the City of Nobel Bar day for -_ ..vpeals, aiwn an, F.n.Rxlav,.mxmn'm.m.aumn m=m rov=e Wplano liance with development cond111 ns and for pW y nonfarm nc with Cry StandardcomrovAl la' WE FASEMRT of File wiscral M1«eon. cNo d niedtuol pmaNemaNml chink was mand ade faythe Improvements cmraq If thew, A.. v_cuTTERR ® M Hear xmnluwre, or - existing Sr proposed dimensions, Imes or groats shown Indust,, all existing 0. m ..I Ga. rola. OR PIPE Pallas show, or not subs. aaA overt aaeo R FF 555.855.1 26. Contractorshall nolifiy City 's office N (909) 039-]B4o mL cmRwlas PAD 555.18 an Want forty-eight (40) hours in adwn<e of intention to begin grading. 27. Cmdm shall comply wM the CdNWm1a Stolt Water Bast Management Imo- 59.99' wy�.a sloe II TC RPInIN /� Pn4i ttl the prajad's Standard Urbvn Storm Wafer Mitigation Plan / CUT (SUSIe egnieme (SUSMPJ wquiramentc as neceumy. rano paMoua arta. 28. Street all rooftop➢ to _ _ / / .cxpuTry mxcre[.r .Arte spam. _ _ _ Ir I.N.A.ETm.,PCXEVE ro E by. . 29. SiRaent tat of fill lolls shall be made during the grading to verify that the Wil properties comply with the tlesign A, month as detem,sed by the Geotmalmucal Engineer including soils types, shear strength parameters and -,.namg unit wei9ms. 30. R -w1 tests chat be aboost" for all nal and p4. roadway mmv pements to Identify theminimumpav Ant st ctur mm l section requirm far fire site unotherwise otM1 wise not required by the C'dy. 31. Type v cemtt shall be used for all concrete wM coming in -text witn the grand, unto. otherwise indicated by the pmjeds ml engines. 32 Gradin antl cons Dim activities and me tranep5rtion of equipment and ateride and WmwA ion of bmey gentling equipment shgll be limit" to between the hours of 71 a.m. and 5:00 ran, Monday through Somrdoy. Dust generated by gmding End constmdlan activltiee Odl be reduced by watetlng the spit ptlw to and during the adivaim and In aacwdanu with South CSwt Ar salty Management KWet flute 402 and Rule 403. REdoirl water shall be used whenever possible. Addmonall6 all otsbud,an equipment stall be properly muffled to reduce at. levels GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 1Q MNMAN E05MIG [RWDYi£ PNTERW Q ENSILING LVt3 ND/OR OIREA 10 ff RIB.IJhD 3 9ALq PER AIRlalEftIRIL RM! M]V ECi © PRTJ4D O.fm PER 3P.yC SID. RAN 1X8-2. AI -6 (15(g). (� RdY ID E£Y,fft Q&NfklE BY N>S BE EWNAIFN(. CCNEkttdI m Ret EPPAC SIR XN-2 WM FCC QYA41.ENf AA SIPFCRT. © PRCRC�D S ARB SEWER LAIEPAL lWM FR'HR ,Niro' Ra3ECRM FEW S4WlC SID. 215-2 f� RAPY3D 4' Re Sal 40 DtWNrME chm 1% SIDf£ MN ® O]Ib'IMICr RaNNNO WN1 AI eJB-gBWN SRTEM, PFR SmUCRRAL R!N S-7. DETAILS 7, iPR SEPA R7WJr. ® OEN6mILT 12)(12' CATOW BASIN WM NDl-AVPRC CRATE DW R]IA'E SPATE WIN NS BASIN <WIE00 IR MO OR EOfrWFM ® Ey35RPlG OBe As <ARRR TO RMNN © CRSRiCT 24 IN]ES AGE IXWCRTE V-0UrnBt FFR DETAILS MgRgN. ® OO5IRUCT l81 RVR. FFA SFVAC Stu. RAN 111. G1Eg a IYFE 1. ® AlSr BEIFCrAet Wr w SWF!£S. fER � M. RAN 111-A shet 10 NOTE B MD FER ADA IELUPEAflWT ® fl05CXG 1fiG 10 ff FfMOvID ® WSTIDID IC PAM}h m BE RA19hD ® WnCtRUCT BEYI COICTEIE WWOWY. FER AIYYBIQ.tWL PLAY © ROOF DRAWN ONIET D911e1T dfCr 10('AIIM MD CETHS Pet R1k.BDG MAN ® PROS FWUICAR PfRO40 sR.eCl. SIIWRNg, AxU LWU('M F m 9Ci4 PER AWeFLTLP01 FlN4 AS -102 ® 1D6fAI1 DEV! OO.IflE OEM VFL1E ASSe.BY AHI 1 1/Y OCAEtiIIC WOFR MGM ® 2-6 PAC 90d 40 I]RNN MFE 1% SLLPE MN SCALE : 1d=10'--0" �-- SECTION A -A i g 'FCI.RR CHnRr Nrs 2x70-�Is..IN PANMwr ed GE Sol SECTION C -C u wpr wAslmmm sw¢r PROLES L G MNlr err FF 555.85 PL °1 ,a PA 555.18 Hua AWPA[ID Br. easy W' *7L! Pa / XCYaSD $E'^ Ear FINE OlAlsoAE5 ARE W PAAAGGN WmmxaRa�O'N Two NCOB -gipfinues. auu, SECTION 0-8 Am SCADS r•xo' GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 1Q MNMAN E05MIG [RWDYi£ PNTERW Q ENSILING LVt3 ND/OR OIREA 10 ff RIB.IJhD 3 9ALq PER AIRlalEftIRIL RM! M]V ECi © PRTJ4D O.fm PER 3P.yC SID. RAN 1X8-2. AI -6 (15(g). (� RdY ID E£Y,fft Q&NfklE BY N>S BE EWNAIFN(. CCNEkttdI m Ret EPPAC SIR XN-2 WM FCC QYA41.ENf AA SIPFCRT. © PRCRC�D S ARB SEWER LAIEPAL lWM FR'HR ,Niro' Ra3ECRM FEW S4WlC SID. 215-2 f� RAPY3D 4' Re Sal 40 DtWNrME chm 1% SIDf£ MN ® O]Ib'IMICr RaNNNO WN1 AI eJB-gBWN SRTEM, PFR SmUCRRAL R!N S-7. DETAILS 7, iPR SEPA R7WJr. ® OEN6mILT 12)(12' CATOW BASIN WM NDl-AVPRC CRATE DW R]IA'E SPATE WIN NS BASIN <WIE00 IR MO OR EOfrWFM ® Ey35RPlG OBe As <ARRR TO RMNN © CRSRiCT 24 IN]ES AGE IXWCRTE V-0UrnBt FFR DETAILS MgRgN. ® OO5IRUCT l81 RVR. FFA SFVAC Stu. RAN 111. G1Eg a IYFE 1. ® AlSr BEIFCrAet Wr w SWF!£S. fER � M. RAN 111-A shet 10 NOTE B MD FER ADA IELUPEAflWT ® fl05CXG 1fiG 10 ff FfMOvID ® WSTIDID IC PAM}h m BE RA19hD ® WnCtRUCT BEYI COICTEIE WWOWY. FER AIYYBIQ.tWL PLAY © ROOF DRAWN ONIET D911e1T dfCr 10('AIIM MD CETHS Pet R1k.BDG MAN ® PROS FWUICAR PfRO40 sR.eCl. SIIWRNg, AxU LWU('M F m 9Ci4 PER AWeFLTLP01 FlN4 AS -102 ® 1D6fAI1 DEV! OO.IflE OEM VFL1E ASSe.BY AHI 1 1/Y OCAEtiIIC WOFR MGM ® 2-6 PAC 90d 40 I]RNN MFE 1% SLLPE MN SCALE : 1d=10'--0" �-- Lm-ro. OTHERS) i g 'FCI.RR CHnRr G 2x70-�Is..IN PANMwr EA,,,,gN15, C,,,UEw IR lC OR 3F THE DERON. SECTION C -C xFznxEuxs. or -7111 FIP FIONT,rsuzrn' n -'"I ea (i5 eSSBa X5p/r;�� Da YON) m -,a@ k3 a5aw) (Tc ce rot) A) x o TEREACE SL4F: N' -ter QffiB ALAE D6NIAL Hua AWPA[ID Br. AS I". INLET oures *7L! Pa $E'^ =m FINE OlAlsoAE5 ARE W -gipfinues. ea tro=t. ONG F RKEE MLFCP RRWr AYO B1•ItlNG WRP(6S LXLY. NWT - rat 911L. MAPY WAXIIi- Am L Cp M� No's? ME ROR TO Ei PMa+m roma mNAc .,ant.,`=iwt..,.,wamnmTALO ll... as SESALE R I III seas. is ER BASIS OF BEARING .summer... FRIEREnb. ^m I-P.mme.o youl .s -_ ..vpeals, aiwn an, F.n.Rxlav,.mxmn'm.m.aumn m=m rov=e Ser cull FRATE FAR,now,+tnd+te�a®I�p�eum gbS. :�6ATcx epsx COLIS COVER A.. v_cuTTERR ® PREPmm ®ficin wmolo aaunE 0. m As ^e•'U xln.n•S .mma.m. PIPE IxLET F 'B' OF NEW CATCH BASIN IN V -GUTTER CYN m for L1N K sf R WRITER lmrm'xWN DEVAnaN: BwssT jam' z' .wwremo vRvnla aV WAR 0.YMN% BT. CIL LAND EKikw Bo Ge. LA monsil. PC,, .cxpuTry mxcre[.r .Arte spam. 1 -EER NEWILETF n.. In was,*"CT-K- WhIcan col EMENT A BYPASS WEIR FRAME`loca .Y, ,`. W- PELEN, lard ®LoProTN Star Enterprises Inc. KN nn` N LoPro'N afwrd KrIStar Enterprises Inc w-- W SHALLOW CATCH BASIN swassee SPRINT SHALLOW CATCH BASIN FIENUENT col FILTER INSERT FILTER INSERT ® oJD6'IRICr TW3 4' CmtTFR At Al A1DWd£ B]UrMA TO FTWIECT THIS 1PAh9C1dfA ® @4TRR:f 4' TNM r£mLS PER ARCHIELTWL RAN AS -IGS ® NOT LhD ® NBbTR4T fie3A FER ctSAILS I iflost ® NOT 1agag ® CQVSDd1Cr BJ INCHES al oCAcwgTE V-OJRER RR IETMts, HBtPDL ® PSD 6' PRC ROC 40 R1i01NlED RPE ® IYWSIRKT 18X18' TAUthI. BOfIQI CATCH BASIN WIM HWFRWPETC CRATE WRi Fl.IXm✓D M -M3636 FILTER OR EQUIVALEM. STENCILED OR LABELED WITH THE 'NO DUMPING-OPNNS TO OCEAN'. LOCO OR EUWALENT. ® COD6DACT 10Xur abrat BARN WM IFAFRC MM STENCILED OR LABELED WITH THE 'NO DUMPING -DRAINS TO OCEAN, LOGO OR EOUNMEM. ® COD6IRULT Be AVIR BEGRETa9E 8Gg MATCH Sa5ghs; FIDMTW. ® CONMUCT 36e PARKWAY DRNN. PER SPPWC Sin PIAN 151-2, AND RECONSTRUCT THE CURB d: GUTTER AND SIDEWALK TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY. ® RRA14➢ OEB 8: GJNER, RR 4A'!C Sm RAN 1X1-2. A2-6 (1 W). O]SRBILT Hob, PCRiRV1 BE CCNCTETE V-CUnER TO l A EUL SIZE ® V-QRie{ Pet DETAILS 14RLN ® ttV61TRJCT Migive£ fE]0115 Olfe ® CONSTRUCT 12' PARKWAY DRAIN. PER SPPWC Bm PIAN 151-2, AND RECDNSTRUCT THE CURB A GUTTec AND SIDEWAM TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY. ® CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE PIPE CLEANOUT ® OTbTRILT 24 le WEE QNL1iTE V-QmeF, FOR CECINAS FES✓QNN. E.L se MINF NH a Ww.W TYPICAL V-GJTTER® (x70 m SGaG wiSAmi" vwm ^i 9 Ed NET LINE PP or EA. Mx MxFGRQ'MTI peole, ln'/Ia' TrPICAL V -GUTTER.. Ww.W IMm ne SNC o L' us In 1 "Al RDxrm�m r -�� jusb Nal TYPICAL V -GUTTER® were07070a GEOnE ICAL ENGINEER'S STATEMENT I-- p mm OF CDHPLTPNCE THIS PLAN HAS BEEN REVIEWED SENT LC BAl .Ear. amed IN R.D.s PVN. NI` ..,N N saE A sly. Nx* z.x/r s DEK& BEl (Xor n S STORM DRAIN SYSTEM STENCILING AND SIGNAGE (NTS) nderground Service Alert 10Call: TOLL FREE t -80C 422-4133 TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG 'G QN': semembw rMt ue Na Dow" ween coq Mau utlllllea Delmging to the Dents. we Need he ¢Nor dome o-, at m. wen Ane m. entm As mmrm W ons In mR N ., .1. 2312 PROJECT 10. 12-051-M wit TO THE MOmE NCu XE PUN ONLY. WE MAIN: NO ON AS TO THE ACCURACY BE ONE FF 555.85 DMT of roma TO THE f53X 2x70-�Is..IN PANMwr EA,,,,gN15, C,,,UEw IR lC OR 3F THE DERON. SECTION C -C RLI_........ Sc.VE Y -m' (i5 eSSBa X5p/r;�� Da YON) m -,a@ k3 a5aw) (Tc ce rot) A) x o SECTION D -O SL4F: N' -ter E.L se MINF NH a Ww.W TYPICAL V-GJTTER® (x70 m SGaG wiSAmi" vwm ^i 9 Ed NET LINE PP or EA. Mx MxFGRQ'MTI peole, ln'/Ia' TrPICAL V -GUTTER.. Ww.W IMm ne SNC o L' us In 1 "Al RDxrm�m r -�� jusb Nal TYPICAL V -GUTTER® were07070a GEOnE ICAL ENGINEER'S STATEMENT I-- p mm OF CDHPLTPNCE THIS PLAN HAS BEEN REVIEWED SENT LC BAl .Ear. amed IN R.D.s PVN. NI` ..,N N saE A sly. Nx* z.x/r s DEK& BEl (Xor n S STORM DRAIN SYSTEM STENCILING AND SIGNAGE (NTS) nderground Service Alert 10Call: TOLL FREE t -80C 422-4133 TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG 'G QN': semembw rMt ue Na Dow" ween coq Mau utlllllea Delmging to the Dents. we Need he ¢Nor dome o-, at m. wen Ane m. entm As mmrm W ons In mR N ., .1. 2312 PROJECT 10. 12-051-M wit TO THE MOmE NCu XE PUN ONLY. WE MAIN: NO ON AS TO THE ACCURACY BE ONE BREA CANYON INVESTMENT, ILC 17528 E. ROWIAND STREET. 288 CITY OF INDUSTRY. C4 91748 ppm awm a la w .r AAAI P1N15 RNM RN EA,,,,gN15, C,,,UEw IR lC OR 3F THE DERON. ME aN a CIAMCND BAR BW HILL AND TMENAIL lm RLI_........ 01111Ina a 1TW scum. s zoo WnK CA ,OBD lFl: rn4) 66Y4vA SITE ADDRESS. OF I mfW IAEA: a9T ALAE GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN QffiB ALAE D6NIAL Hua AWPA[ID Br. N M- NmE RE V_a FINE OlAlsoAE5 ARE W Y ,m ONG F RKEE MLFCP RRWr AYO B1•ItlNG WRP(6S LXLY. NWT - rat 911L. MAPY WAXIIi- L Cp M� No's? ME ROR TO Ei PMa+m roma mNAc u a as C-17 < R y BASIS OF BEARING PRO -_ CFmFR NIE Cf 9SA GW1A! Rall) mxE RSxrm NxlD,ial gbS. :�6ATcx epsx BENCH MARK A.. v_cuTTERR ® PREPmm ®ficin U Q.19 0. m %AuU PIPE pFW of TM' N N CB 19 W/O Raw My CCP M F 'B' OF NEW CATCH BASIN IN V -GUTTER CYN m for L1N K sf lmrm'xWN DEVAnaN: BwssT jam' z' vRvnla aV WAR 0.YMN% BT. CIL LAND EKikw Bo Ge. LA E.L se MINF NH a Ww.W TYPICAL V-GJTTER® (x70 m SGaG wiSAmi" vwm ^i 9 Ed NET LINE PP or EA. Mx MxFGRQ'MTI peole, ln'/Ia' TrPICAL V -GUTTER.. Ww.W IMm ne SNC o L' us In 1 "Al RDxrm�m r -�� jusb Nal TYPICAL V -GUTTER® were07070a GEOnE ICAL ENGINEER'S STATEMENT I-- p mm OF CDHPLTPNCE THIS PLAN HAS BEEN REVIEWED SENT LC BAl .Ear. amed IN R.D.s PVN. NI` ..,N N saE A sly. Nx* z.x/r s DEK& BEl (Xor n S STORM DRAIN SYSTEM STENCILING AND SIGNAGE (NTS) nderground Service Alert 10Call: TOLL FREE t -80C 422-4133 TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG 'G QN': semembw rMt ue Na Dow" ween coq Mau utlllllea Delmging to the Dents. we Need he ¢Nor dome o-, at m. wen Ane m. entm As mmrm W ons In mR N ., .1. 2312 PROJECT 10. 12-051-M wit TO THE MOmE NCu XE PUN ONLY. WE MAIN: NO ON AS TO THE ACCURACY BE ONE BREA CANYON INVESTMENT, ILC 17528 E. ROWIAND STREET. 288 CITY OF INDUSTRY. C4 91748 ppm awm a la w .r AAAI P1N15 RNM RN EA,,,,gN15, C,,,UEw IR lC OR 3F THE DERON. ME aN a CIAMCND BAR BW HILL AND TMENAIL lm TEL: (626) 913 - 01111Ina a 1TW scum. s zoo WnK CA ,OBD lFl: rn4) 66Y4vA SITE ADDRESS. 650 BREA CANYDN R[IR➢, DIRMDND BAR GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN ,alEAawaDs' R<E 3az4z SATE Hua AWPA[ID Br. 6 K INC. XNSIILT.bVIa flYD (IIII"11) IXSa•ME ° Ili lii l IIII IIII IIII ') (ft ss,_AM) a \ ssa h.IN� d.1 �RA�I G_AND DRAT NAG,�Pt AN-- IF Ilil I mIwN syn lniaA91 �t\� ---- n_ I n Q II IIII 1 F kk hhI( `v IF g. 5sa.la) NO'22'23"W 5.00" �('Q \ II IIII 017 31 r'Y� s G snxs) ® - 1. 20 ACCESS ROAD — `T"°,'LE III 'O \ CD yytt Jli ilij j III Wed nmu t® POLL ox —® N89'48b�"E 167.73• \ III Iu Wil IIII I I I' nss oej ('x �T> N89.48"07°E 103.55' IXN-11-E awlff =(n s5ev) (n sss,mi' 1 Ind, . �. nn. _"- - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ° sE� l ` woii m ssi1 Ia eE lqa"cua° -_ 157.73'x� s...z ) I`a`ai A414EMoh Ig Til II IIC Pvd e�i _ _ -- e---------- 011 - _ r C4- li ° III I� _ �-- —(6sN Rma (ro ssse» rE sss,rz � Ii ii 01 I I I I I I I I I IA47 i I Al'^Ni0° r5 I Ic sssss) � S m) ulr'a tm s6sm) I I INT sTm m IeitPiHLI Nu1`C-3su7C AmxI U Er —� � rs sse79) / sAMZI UNE III zt II aITAn+ I h j \ BY II wnu ii I l 1 AMIry .1u II (Lz>z) I �- 0 NANN09 idyl 1 h �j �� • �i ss ssaml II I I`I I- I -I III I / #188 4 II m lI l l l l l l lxO it I 'cmG 11 WBIIIC I IT III I� h I I \ _ - _ \ vlli nol l� 1 Al `e (Lxxl Sol it ll d I"gJAI9os�sr%#'I .�" 'li a tsu9.1 ExACPrM oq nlr rem - I- IIII =.1i 3 A I I_ "�I h �� / vvIli • -Ex uPwl. ro°mAlx� — f l 1 1 t I \ i \\ IX IPAI. w h ro PEMeI��, (s °e I \ mtW '1 fS I ° ii I = i HJ1Y5�.��I I IIII I I I li / \ 0 2 n.wq I I Exa� Iii �Il� gyph h I // v II A.A.8 le �— T71 li I `� A jA. (uv Ili �_ lam) (c..zN Aces) 0 f95rn Vi I I 1 III I' I� #178- #100 �li I • tS'z°) ° n. (fs sssn II I ii4(sj7c i6i frs sssl6 w�sl+muE¢e li li ( I P 8 / IIII rem Are) OE sssu; IIII uxhd Ir / q ff (vwcx) m6e (x -slur m I I PIN 1 I / FF 555.85 II &o ©0 88" nm°�250 _T Ip I IIII MA t I I PAD 555.1800 III rs Sul xe III Ili l I ii I III I IIII �''1 I'�e11 I / III Are a Ill I I ii 11 / tN Ii „re • nmm°°.w® ��— liV I IIQI III I I I )" i1I IIs! / II • (n mw) (TO sss w) III trs smm tm smmh_ II1 M�°0 er it v uuBa Iii I I I Ph III zMlil &a6 II °• 5 >f EN uu°scwE rosaE PCu°YnIN �0.39M c d1 n I ax 11 II I me°wc rssse°/ " Qi s)sssaa) PAY II I 1°� �' W 9' _ g ANUT uxE i s u u6xI�YY ' s I IN6 I I I #166 mcE °f j1/' �0 { 6"+ / i\( I I I I I D II wamm ssc °r I< ro 6 °E A/n o -y ( sss W D it III I I I V I I �I Q • wANW\ E'.A" _______�/ Ex L ISI I 11 D / l:r�l SAWNf IPE \ �iS 55615) LEAWCUi uNE O 556 $I) n N #158 • \ uR a Avant / n II d l lV I "Ing" y I „�. are° _---------'--'/ ®nsAll IN Ilii ISH " �`M^•I �I j Sg=�$yII IS a amsz (EtsAs/) ' I I E 11' a a'I w via01 R jj 11 I III IIb-rA I II s m= .c.A m' - _--___-(N- __ -- II I (wBsxl +(ua v ruxr s iibj IIII S°°" seen7ut Aw re(s5e1� III xr°ffm01wr • rtme3 PI SSs ) qsR s) I 1 __ fs ss AI n=1 4 rs(se(e) I I I I l l i -- 1 -_ -_ ('W ills) mep -. I I I I I I I�""1551eS�?as' a IL mn Oe O ❑ IX \ -_ TW n Oc sw.) Ir PILL I* a n(ssea6) Plnk smx I I I I I I l -- - • e rx mn is fs sss. el I. v N LI s 21 z FL(11 MLI) ` \ \ IM sn aulw ••••��� z... �` SW sssse ame7 rs a (xP sss Pmnn N89.58" 9eE 90. 4" ruxE I I I I I I \ - • xv mu AN wlx u6T T� - -' m - - t -_ - 7 � m axs-.--- .I -- �.- __-- _------------- -sse g EN PeLL�{-amu 1 ) \ \ \ _ �- _ zF n' _ - ate^ _ _ r6 R2 - fi1 AetY R(556.11) S \ - - - To Ale a r G ry sx -09 - _ - - - - - - - - Ane FI(Ia) x \ IF IF --y{-- - _�__ .11 OF- - _fsss)_Qe��s sA G, �-_ ---- zest x =11 � swso -PP Ell nmw'-esi�_(sszl--__ a •� -_.� -• �- a °mm $ tgssees// _ _ _ - - - - - H(ssass)�_-- �a3i__ ssY-re_ Qd1sL91fss11--_- _ e e mw_- _ .x Q f E1 RA mC ��.. "'a-f�,x0)0$ 7'` ___--�_, \ f _YCAeE-- E .la 4 mAsu4aa's w -Am I�rswmias �._ t 6 fi`amR - rs \) g \\_N -P----__-_ _ -_ zc Axle-_--_-_ ° _ 8 - (vsl-�- --_ T rs(eA3j�_—S91O1jsr1 _-�Llr-sIa50___________ —o osmal) __ X eni 55xw tl rs s5l.$) N� RIP -IF N ` 4` \ O sEwA sAl.1° ____� + ____________ ___ _ __ _ r q -sxI aF-_o-_--�Wa �la °ouEmc wArzu u_ N1 DAMP\ - 7 R-1460.00' a(5.9v) �' a usxl q\ _----mac,- ul ----=N89.48�07"E-3-12- > f�90x) _ ic(sis6aj*-__Wg.a_ _1]=-'""_trxn �__se aura -Ex XEcu r �2 (fS 51x.65 S°EWNX 191 Ex 1RNiIC �_ _ __ _ _ ______ _ _ __ L-�- Im R(599g1 �rqs Ig) LD �NVS�RA�yJ r fil]Irz R(cl°.ae) yyv EBTE[ STATEMENT % _ _ _ it(519.aR d�> _ _ y^_ � wrE.EF- EX Sr - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - '�`� G HNiCAL ENGINEERS ST T A°ATOWO BT - - - - - - - - - =-- L - - - - - Zxi slvbl BF COMPLIANCE att OF OWNM) HAS BEEN REV - -IX EIECIPI- - - - - - - _ IXIEIPXa1E� ONE _ _ _ _ _ _ _ WHE _ 3 - � THIS PLAN ff'!ED BY. _---_-_--r- _-4W __RW R/ —�tW RW RW / RW �RW RW RW RW RW RW RW —RW ---RW RW —RW —RW NE ODmATO nOREI INCONFORMANCE N MR RIT � THE IX AEaAWE6J SEPIFL9R A 2012 PROJECT NO. 12-0I-001 wATx AND ONIERUNE TI Al smEEr_ - EARTHWORK REAEW WAS UMIM TO THE GEOTEQINCAL GW u W e y ASPECA ff 1HE FLAX ONLY. WE HAVE NO sos SVD — SV9 — Stl`� — SOL — s o ar_..__ 300 c WI�RISt�ONSR1ff L TO THE C" LCULAIll OR TTHE HE aTY01W DUL—'- 30 �" ANY FCITION OF THE DESIGN. Ex zr TOTAL ABFA: 0.9r AaIE HALL Am FtlE1 Nn WASHINGTON STREET A�Tm Atm — 17R3171x SIN _ - THEW xme Underground Service Alert 4 � 111, 64) T)f SIE,TANDIEia1aA11FA uEFa+ oaFr 111, 64) AND REIN SLABS AND CONCRETE OF NO. SHOULD B1 A MINIMUM OF 4 INCHES NICK ATTENTION THE"AN0 BEMpIo PWPJ¢5 DRY. 1sa \ AND REINFORCED WITH A MINIMUM OF LA0. 4 BARS AT 18 INCHES IN CENTER BOW All utMDbe shown on this plan are based on ay Mable B TME TM^a1°I RINL W WM7- Cali: TOLL FREE WAYS OR ED VALENT. ALL SNB REINFORCpMENT SAOUI➢ BE SUPPORTED TO ENSURE rwortla It shall be Na sola reganaNAliy of the a.ntr.cfor 16 PFNR 10 rnART ff WJIxX6 IB. Ew inns PROPER POSIDDNING DURING PNCf}AENT OF CONCRETE. CONCRETE SLABS IN MOISTURE to verity all existing utilities by .antoatin9 WMity .won • `�ecuBi`� SENSITIVE AREAS SHOULD BE UNDERWN WW A VAPOR BARRIER CONSIST OFA and to .veld aama9mH ewlstm9 moms• swans .xwwtlon. BASIS OF BEARING -SOD MINIMUM OF 10 MIL POLYVINYL CHLORIDE MEMBRANE WW ALL NPS SEALED. A FOR UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT CALL: �f r� ,1 MURDEMBIN MINIMUM OF ONE INCH OF SAND SHOULD BE PLACED OVER WE MEMBRANE TO AID IN GOISFR UNE ff BGEA GN)P1 POAO 1, 422-4 LTMM INC ftQ1ARIEW (( UNIFORM CURING OF CONCRETE 1-eW-♦22-113D W W W a E ullEPT ROAD 76[ uw16FRT N, V, W y/ W W W W W W W 1W0 WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU OIG U 9]H31 G G 93231 IX 16' CgMIY BM a4� - "CIA I-611-1050 Ey [W BM GO W x C° in W/o PON HA III SABA 'CWOW' RIPA-I. Nal W 11L Cmb Patlxn ARY LTI IIX M, LXUI• IA• rn Mwf AUDIIn. In RAL SO Edwq'y b IM1a Hole. R.en ewN be Mm uL1N6 pvmt a11M1e wrM ail> Tha mlv •il etbm Sv R£YAlglk 5638Y: en q wJlnWl. / Exa16 / � exs wIx ca OR, OR fi(fL sxc71) i 9' HIGH IX cl �x TE '(fs 6w. I 5•jM snwEur E HEs SIN x) INIAf4 EIAEuor PER XI i01 X�OSSb51. n.V 1' F` wmr .En INSL -'1i Sb51. AELL JANVAM I5, rz%J. 0.P. ae A �.m0 /D \ (I.arz) s 1� 0 sdx T PEP IN AhB5A51. 555ECT NNEI4RY S M (z°zx -E ACPVMI- I° FAR ti iA E IC _ 1 5� f 3)- I BREA CANYON INVESTMENT, LLC 17528 E. ROWLAND STREET, 0288 CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91748 TEL (626) 913-8939 650 BREP LPNYDN RDPD,-'AN➢NO BAR GiE GRA➢TNG AND DRAINAGE PLAN ss, NaP cy O 4}1 THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR) �A out IDYC —AA- i.Y➢1'J•C aMVY14 ,N ON saws oll., ro amla xvam_m naemm ZO I Lg9�tlU•JI11� ��� ��aa',s7 i I I e � L ]I y A' a�! _vs r✓� aT� Ni ' 9`RSf(4 .' C ' YS �Y'r 'rIY. II Mtl 1Alo Hew/ B� EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 0 .......... FND OFOBHOEIE ATTACHMENT A NOTES 5YLLDO......PROPO3D RANATGN 1. Mea el.nysr aA �Wbd 94HF.@IS R .._._._ROW EYE 2 Fgr[M,�.� M,Y19! m diopr/ak b M ypaN wtn ....... TOP WALE unhd qm u mafal i—_-DRNNAGE PAT ERN B Aa.A I4 mw.rl d.me� $.d w9 HDI dq Wey by GAA..._._..-0GUIBE CHECK DETECTOR od hvAa./,11� bM. FS .._._._.fMIMI SURFACE A PA ipa pd mmi 9uln mW In ndtlM MN gmxl top —_PROPERTY IBE MANG 0)w Mr Arv9 kola Wq "MdNWmW kmF. S Em%tltl WnnbMolMp Im nua In mNr vA TC_.__._IW OF GUAM dwlM. MR w ❑ _.COM BA4H OR ARP bMr. neN! J$eY wry v xFa 0. A.dPAm W wIM1 m1 M. anrbatlai,ilM moNb4 -4 4 FS. ...... _F,,N RttR pNtltl Avn MP 9a9vIM M qr b Itl tlx 1a[rr a1 Wd ..GRAM BM xob. 7. NW dh,"m ma Na lmk rmMdr mW In —danw wm mw WFR ad m M amm,EmN Cr wl mtl uuMu wb. u 4POW uuWr mdTn m m 4 pddat hmn Ma rwNr., mM 4 p ma In alPm.d d m . r,.Pr mmn.. a m.r ea a.mxrd SIM w MMN; dd,ePr y.Mx a EM1Y uwb miReb en/M 4 Me q. Wile nry mp,Mmq dv AhM . In Am, enan4 . awe A. 1M od mAudb ntoW w" srM nxd 4 dq M Fb a aTN �qMr b pmol enlanFoup W do. aN.r tY xiN In s.emibm N.. md.b.n�dr�RmA',ta �9md vdHr Gage Thr vmMiNn smbtlP MpdWiM Fb qr Wtlkp MomFPr, AmMmb dgerxm.-r b wqt w Fa*.ea ri m+ew ed 4 NM Tem IryM n aYN,mn. 11. Mr ya .M dYhrM Hrcbudd 6VydNn m�db dd9IM A m m 9AP.R ..+W 4.xa M..4. 11 Gld 8✓w mwl4 pobeW Mtl1 IW 64p aq 4M 9qe 151 WASHINGTON STREET - - -r- AWA9 6 W, LEGEND Mtl 1Alo Hew/ B� (4145.1)-.ASMG EIEVATICN 0 .......... FND OFOBHOEIE FG ,.__..fIXl91 NTE (A 5YLLDO......PROPO3D RANATGN IF .-._._.END OF PAVEMENT R .._._._ROW EYE -(530)-OOSDNC COUttYBtTIXG._ ....... TOP WALE 5........W OFF -TOP OF MING i—_-DRNNAGE PAT ERN INV ----.INVERT MAIM GAA..._._..-0GUIBE CHECK DETECTOR ..EMSPXG SIRUCIUPE FS .._._._.fMIMI SURFACE BAfNELDN A�1&Y —_PROPERTY IBE BF._.-.._._BOTRM OF MNP PO _RRE HYDRANT TC_.__._IW OF GUAM ❑ _.COM BA4H OR ARP -D--D-_DAIIXNT IBE FB_._-.ANR1 MWACE -.IMIT OF GRAVING FS. ...... _F,,N RttR ..GRAM BM HIP ...... Ul6M PONT 4 W W W .JDA PATI Cf 1RAl Oromax caxTRa xDTEs OA CONSTRUCT CSAM1 BAS EROSION COONOL ALONG BOUNIMIM OF CONSTRUCTION AREA TM GRAVTL BAGS SHOULD BE 2 BAGS WE ANO 2 BAGS HIM PER BMP SE -a OB cM5RUCT GRAVEL BAG EROSION CGDR0. MOUND CATCH BASIN. ME G OAR BMS SHOULD BE 2 BAGS WOE AND 2 BAGS HIGH. PER BMP SE -B, EROSION CONTROL PLAN 4 SCALE : 1"=20'-0" A� rda z ears xEarr nw z a a VIDE rvrvN wax rcnsN wwE SECDON A—A A TYPICAL SEC7I� A " v are Im a rl+.oN.ac ran odox P n9cor. nmM. 6-k 660) W9 4NPnt emn tLLL cmwm!;m•. Ad MC mW CMvtNC(1 BW4peuwT G'lbwvYt[mel.oeAaptiv GmlP9MNtlW1SMmwN+Pnsd Ga'DBS cAs9wam o,e N o-1 Ind Mm a�xF, dmm � a .x.;ro'm rem bomlmmad emtWxYmdm Elmo Pxtiklmom,c d $w4e,mmmm.awmM x� rd qe Pl.m.d vm[mmhWpvle'v841 dx@m>ab�mc xmlma oFmoi ho t[epm9w�rd dbimplmimhdmall onorem4ungmaN9 paolmm8?ieir®mam pnxmA9ad4edMPODW Wbmmpo,'I.frmn We$ehehWr.NmegeO[JWeg rew+!ep .Io-rarwleemtPtopma®KMbdwxwoa: ' SxOmaLLCOOhcL $Y!lcacpEruwDN4bgBnlmmeg [Rnc6ees e �9dPmvndagod4Tm5mdd11mlb ua rivehWWw.swl4arcB0der.mwd rcamxP. . �mmmwloa "�L.cwEa+YmtErxrzMmwu®a Memmdmw.s®er$�Bx.mx,,,xNm•mmmm md»yaauxxlewD'dludxexxvolvNbhvBom$®6oivedxpeNMMmme b vp. mua[bxwrylryi®1i&ey mlmaYmtSewxheddoxmhYm4TMb➢mY wue®s 1• Asea mot4pidWMwfimmkoBonxhn o$lm¢8ltltleacepeblemvovoovLObvcmootletu9ntyemmingwWaedogmdmmuuvoe ofveektlm. + �camwmmwnadromcdcdmmmam,+am�maw:mwmdlc«umeu�mlb,wnwxt mimmm:am _. . �. xymtEew.$mi.mq=Wro4memxsa,.kxW.Px'9m.emddmr�. bametlemmw oo-x4euulnRefvm Nrypmpcmb eiryuedervrxyukd VuumvellemmexaweWlmp. RA>I��.i$_ - mvrtLe2poxlA'u,baeovrmi nmphcicbMeueel vonmmin[lim Mm6,mb and a^Peml "m wvtl. aodtraAvdE ewndemaanmmeE!iN"pemidon mommbam Newnmvb¢vMewaNe Allxmo+Mmx]exwVvamnmvsw m49rtdmxl tu, u. Eem$e wa0v. 3P11Lmmi4d:metlup(mmedmvlY®a tlYpvxedaliuslmpv®,a. 9PP!amy mfbeae$e3 Wome@Ns9egalem Ieekop eq Wpvmdmualbemy4b3ily. o s uc'<.+�d,maammeure.Xoe.wlwrzw'.Gm.sn.lmmmd9m•mn,a.xo.4Ww Ewu®agntywbdmvuc W mW bnoevmed wilt myorplexiu + Nw3mw A'uMBuooPNoo-ulsmt wtxwmVLmaquipMn[ztl Mi"vlewulengudmy egvaoMily rMlhamm4vEMNep'a)e4$e ' ATTACHMENT C NOTES AS THE OWNER I OF THE PROJECT. I HAVE RENEWED THE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES HANDBOOKS (BMP•S), CAUFORNIA STORM WATER QUALITY TASK FORCE. SACRAMENTO, CA. AND HAVE PROPOSED THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE BEST ACIINTES ON THE SURROUNDING WATER QUAUTY. THE SELECTED BMP'S ML - BE INSTALLED, MONITORED AND MAINTAINED TO ENSURE THEIR EFFECTIVENESS THE BMP -S THAT I HAVE NOT CHOSEN FOR IMPLEMENTATION ARE REDUNDANT OR DEEMED NOT APPUCABLE TO THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ACDVYFES. IF AT ANY TIME. SITE CONDITIONS AND/ OR THE QTY OFFICIAL WARRANT REEVALUATION AND REVISIONS OF THE CHOSEN MAP'S, THE APPROPRIATE CHANGES WALL BE MADE WITHOUT UNNECESSARY DELAY. I AM AWARE THAT FAIWRE TO PROPERLY IMPLEMENT AND MAINTAIN, MILE UNDER CONSTRUCTOR, THE BMP'S NECESSARY TO PREVENT THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS FROM THIS PROJECT COULD RESULT IN SIGNIFICANT PENALTIES ANO/OP DELAYS. SIGNATURE PRINT NAME:C IN LEGE DATE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: BUILDING WITH WALKWAY ON A VACANT LOT PROJECT ADDRESS: fi5D BPEA CANYON ROAD. DIAMOND BAR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER'S STATEMENT W COMPLIANCE THIS PLAN HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY - st graP» slm m.m"! x and wtmmlwoh.!e!s' ti 3 r a am.n m.e,.. Aammmle.BOM.m4 gxmxl CwMm del Ywti3dktam Raa'ImlluxA xabmtt tl�tin NW[NODmtlaRe W.a.Omuo•Cmw�a aroma I i +• imm ( `�°^"' ¢morel Pmn[�Fmm4)wdmontlead Cnymme WYK9wN@mdoDeok A•SNSMaOWo[aPdLdrmP amtlmi Pmvv(dlca%m2o Tbmil4d Mm-(Fypi¢m g?�eP� appom4 SVWURitMl NmmenmxsabeM.Meixd f hbbe Wo-lzupmmµes. Cntl" vtic Axgm Id4Ne,gmmx•mr0xmrmdmwrd (rzwdlmllfYmcdnmkeWeMYsmmth mewlley xme4mamm�wmmuom eYebxms<I4xrzwwdmammdge,mTbmamm meduhom mol vbevwtlerselMk mm IAmmm,mdmvwWA®mum lyma[wky�9w3i �m,dYm$,A��.MmW p„AlmdlFmp,em�mebn(Bsem19(eme _J9B= SBgd9mdoan¢1Fux v„:� .� miro ....-� BVI Urt Wa.td<-Fi3dPl BREI CANYON INVESTMENT, LLC 5r__ ,t917528 E. ROWIAND STREET, 1288 CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91748 aM a TEL (626) 913-8939 1650 BREA CANYON ROAD, DIAMOND BAR II s Ra.PmPNz BAN EROSION CONTROL PLAN 91' ➢Paxe9el IM41NC � o^.tY, ,� (IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BARD NRCTMR IN tia GAD �/E wn Ik mhL mxmm.� xWq��. vxvac w, rn tai ,m x�n ImVDm ,a ImNe Mtl 1Alo Hew/ B� 1 810IpOE rrxrsN cxnx BJ Gensx SECTIINV B -B GRAa BAG AROUND CATCH BASIN v are Im a rl+.oN.ac ran odox P n9cor. nmM. 6-k 660) W9 4NPnt emn tLLL cmwm!;m•. Ad MC mW CMvtNC(1 BW4peuwT G'lbwvYt[mel.oeAaptiv GmlP9MNtlW1SMmwN+Pnsd Ga'DBS cAs9wam o,e N o-1 Ind Mm a�xF, dmm � a .x.;ro'm rem bomlmmad emtWxYmdm Elmo Pxtiklmom,c d $w4e,mmmm.awmM x� rd qe Pl.m.d vm[mmhWpvle'v841 dx@m>ab�mc xmlma oFmoi ho t[epm9w�rd dbimplmimhdmall onorem4ungmaN9 paolmm8?ieir®mam pnxmA9ad4edMPODW Wbmmpo,'I.frmn We$ehehWr.NmegeO[JWeg rew+!ep .Io-rarwleemtPtopma®KMbdwxwoa: ' SxOmaLLCOOhcL $Y!lcacpEruwDN4bgBnlmmeg [Rnc6ees e �9dPmvndagod4Tm5mdd11mlb ua rivehWWw.swl4arcB0der.mwd rcamxP. . �mmmwloa "�L.cwEa+YmtErxrzMmwu®a Memmdmw.s®er$�Bx.mx,,,xNm•mmmm md»yaauxxlewD'dludxexxvolvNbhvBom$®6oivedxpeNMMmme b vp. mua[bxwrylryi®1i&ey mlmaYmtSewxheddoxmhYm4TMb➢mY wue®s 1• Asea mot4pidWMwfimmkoBonxhn o$lm¢8ltltleacepeblemvovoovLObvcmootletu9ntyemmingwWaedogmdmmuuvoe ofveektlm. + �camwmmwnadromcdcdmmmam,+am�maw:mwmdlc«umeu�mlb,wnwxt mimmm:am _. . �. xymtEew.$mi.mq=Wro4memxsa,.kxW.Px'9m.emddmr�. bametlemmw oo-x4euulnRefvm Nrypmpcmb eiryuedervrxyukd VuumvellemmexaweWlmp. RA>I��.i$_ - mvrtLe2poxlA'u,baeovrmi nmphcicbMeueel vonmmin[lim Mm6,mb and a^Peml "m wvtl. aodtraAvdE ewndemaanmmeE!iN"pemidon mommbam Newnmvb¢vMewaNe Allxmo+Mmx]exwVvamnmvsw m49rtdmxl tu, u. Eem$e wa0v. 3P11Lmmi4d:metlup(mmedmvlY®a tlYpvxedaliuslmpv®,a. 9PP!amy mfbeae$e3 Wome@Ns9egalem Ieekop eq Wpvmdmualbemy4b3ily. o s uc'<.+�d,maammeure.Xoe.wlwrzw'.Gm.sn.lmmmd9m•mn,a.xo.4Ww Ewu®agntywbdmvuc W mW bnoevmed wilt myorplexiu + Nw3mw A'uMBuooPNoo-ulsmt wtxwmVLmaquipMn[ztl Mi"vlewulengudmy egvaoMily rMlhamm4vEMNep'a)e4$e ' ATTACHMENT C NOTES AS THE OWNER I OF THE PROJECT. I HAVE RENEWED THE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES HANDBOOKS (BMP•S), CAUFORNIA STORM WATER QUALITY TASK FORCE. SACRAMENTO, CA. AND HAVE PROPOSED THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE BEST ACIINTES ON THE SURROUNDING WATER QUAUTY. THE SELECTED BMP'S ML - BE INSTALLED, MONITORED AND MAINTAINED TO ENSURE THEIR EFFECTIVENESS THE BMP -S THAT I HAVE NOT CHOSEN FOR IMPLEMENTATION ARE REDUNDANT OR DEEMED NOT APPUCABLE TO THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ACDVYFES. IF AT ANY TIME. SITE CONDITIONS AND/ OR THE QTY OFFICIAL WARRANT REEVALUATION AND REVISIONS OF THE CHOSEN MAP'S, THE APPROPRIATE CHANGES WALL BE MADE WITHOUT UNNECESSARY DELAY. I AM AWARE THAT FAIWRE TO PROPERLY IMPLEMENT AND MAINTAIN, MILE UNDER CONSTRUCTOR, THE BMP'S NECESSARY TO PREVENT THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS FROM THIS PROJECT COULD RESULT IN SIGNIFICANT PENALTIES ANO/OP DELAYS. SIGNATURE PRINT NAME:C IN LEGE DATE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: BUILDING WITH WALKWAY ON A VACANT LOT PROJECT ADDRESS: fi5D BPEA CANYON ROAD. DIAMOND BAR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER'S STATEMENT W COMPLIANCE THIS PLAN HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY - st graP» slm m.m"! x and wtmmlwoh.!e!s' ti 3 r a am.n m.e,.. Aammmle.BOM.m4 gxmxl CwMm del Ywti3dktam Raa'ImlluxA xabmtt tl�tin NW[NODmtlaRe W.a.Omuo•Cmw�a aroma I i +• imm ( `�°^"' ¢morel Pmn[�Fmm4)wdmontlead Cnymme WYK9wN@mdoDeok A•SNSMaOWo[aPdLdrmP amtlmi Pmvv(dlca%m2o Tbmil4d Mm-(Fypi¢m g?�eP� appom4 SVWURitMl NmmenmxsabeM.Meixd f hbbe Wo-lzupmmµes. Cntl" vtic Axgm Id4Ne,gmmx•mr0xmrmdmwrd (rzwdlmllfYmcdnmkeWeMYsmmth mewlley xme4mamm�wmmuom eYebxms<I4xrzwwdmammdge,mTbmamm meduhom mol vbevwtlerselMk mm IAmmm,mdmvwWA®mum lyma[wky�9w3i �m,dYm$,A��.MmW p„AlmdlFmp,em�mebn(Bsem19(eme _J9B= SBgd9mdoan¢1Fux v„:� .� miro ....-� BVI Urt Wa.td<-Fi3dPl BREI CANYON INVESTMENT, LLC 5r__ ,t917528 E. ROWIAND STREET, 1288 CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91748 aM a TEL (626) 913-8939 1650 BREA CANYON ROAD, DIAMOND BAR II s Ra.PmPNz BAN EROSION CONTROL PLAN 91' ➢Paxe9el IM41NC � o^.tY, ,� (IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BARD NRCTMR IN tia GAD �/E wn Ik mhL mxmm.� xWq��. vxvac w, rn tai ,m x�n ImVDm ,a ImNe NOTES REQUIRED PFR W.V. MD. ALI TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF IANOSCAPF AREA SERVED BY METER: I I, 100 50UARE FEET MANLIUM DEMAND SERVED BY METEPo I CLO GALLONS PER MINUTE ESTIMATED ANNUAL WATER USAGE SERVED BY METER: 57,100 GALLON5 PER YEAR INCH, on Iron and Ade Sox pianbng ar s e to remain and be "o eRed. ----------------- ------ . ---Ye, WASFIINGTON STREET AProcre"e'orelam ofPo6Aarstrow" dm)mtmrenAmy e. pnq tor— a wa.e"al, sponder spEem Rtruartl avatar Di m "ince A2 valc'y1111eaardhalrmmnm aralwe m . Oily n Gallen rnga[ion Fleads Table - ContraQor enfy head c unt from plan IrT ion Pape rolle d was 2c0 PVC Pipe nm -pressure Lou...ou... Purple coo. I ° Stlledule 40 NO Piot Main lion Purr' tool Ire,p ;on Equipment Tablt Ouannry Symbd Equipment 4 q Tnm 290 OF 04 1- "im o".I Valve: IneG;1 in.gronnd in Pnryld valve tart Ranbvd ETA B srxion mnLToller; m5..4an wm1 where shown. ALL BY 5TING VALVES ARE TO BE REMOVED, ALONG WITH ALL EXISTING SPPoNGERS AND PIPING REAS THAT IS IN IN ASHOWN TO HAVE NEW IRRIGATION. ALL NEW VALVES ARE TO BE INSTALLED IN PLANTER Al VALVES SHOWN ON THIS PUN IN NON -PLANTER LOCATIONS ARE FOR GRAPHIC CLARRY ONLY; AGING AREAS 15 TO DE INSTALLED IN 5CH 40 PVO PIPE OF Ouanhty Symbol Sprmtl=r Meads 14 O IONG5]0Ma<cned Prempika<,on WG -s 4'Sremal Pat<ems 554 4 0 TORO STO Mxcned Preopitatlm Rites 4''—I Patterns EST 57 5 TORO 57. 0.11. Frmphahon Rarer 11F--. l2 dell Trust, BIve1 180 B O TORO 570 Ml PreopP.anonWte, lO5en6 wrtb 12 well ItAlsoory(BWe) 090 a O r 1 15 TORO 570 Matched Frmpi44on Rrtae 10' Sends wxh 12 dy Tralectory MI.) 360 2 E TORO 570 Matched Foredw"RXS IDEpho Rh 12 del Tr,weay(Glop 270 aEv. Iden.1 1 1 u u TORO 570Aider, "Mod, Ries 10' Senn w2E I z deg TraJectory(54x) 240 5 O 34 11 B RM PVC CCU BO NIPPLE AS REQUIRED) al TuR03005tream Rotor 150mm AdJusGble-RadmS Hassle 270 B REMrt1E NITTOL Val O SCX w NPPte (DIOSE)ire S ED POWFA SUPPLY Z Q Mat Q z 2 14 2. All regmred poor to be eamPleted and signed edetate Cori of O5 PVC 5CH 40 STREET ELL treaded water. 9 WC Seal 90 NIPPLE RM Mw peg Arrood 0, the Dietride Ults and Reguladmo and county of Ins Ayele, 5CH 40 TEE OR ELL OeparGnent of POHE HnIM. 33 (1IN_O M1onzomally and I loot vertolly A,th Potaple wafer line dual ng perpe tedwo, WOMEN II over Terri water n ). If a recycled water, To crosses over a potable water c, the reryded wRer Ene shell be mstalird,reide a sleeve wdM1 the sleeve Fare 11 P!C MMNIINE PIPE -PURPLE renmrea aver the "wine watdr line ane rernded aueat 1 o flee, on doth Amo. OFFICE Nosfy Jre Yersky at WslnuE Valley Water Butnct ak (909) 595-1268 for ns III 3 13 INCH W��N ST PHI LN) 32 195 L.Axm lm Goanty also dual "reeAnre or ore test the sntem'oefor=avnng M dnw pem:anmt elonnenion. For DE1. PND Notify Joe Yersky 0 W.V wO add Dan Carom, Q LA. wunry AN (6261 430-5290, .1 final 'Halloo n - 2 day wnfi®pan. 2,020 1A vu n 140 Eu191E p,Mp SCN AD TEE oR Eu Ell II 4 12 31 15 BAC LATERAL PIPE-PURPL£ II Ili 6 1f 30 1E s"'NOOF LABEL FOR RECLAIMED WATER III ® 6 " 16 ON WALL MOUNTED CONTROLLER OFFICE POP-UP SPRINKLER TREN011NG DETAIL REMOTE CONTROL VALVE 29 PB o10CE III tna S.F. III 1,988 86 S.F. II 9 IIII d A3 ® 7 18 III III 27 I 26 0188E III 1,910 SE .wae dual wall at this OFfiCE II Imabm, or per ow,, d r d, 188 II 1,101 SF. II INCH, on Iron and Ade Sox pianbng ar s e to remain and be "o eRed. ----------------- ------ . ---Ye, WASFIINGTON STREET AProcre"e'orelam ofPo6Aarstrow" dm)mtmrenAmy e. pnq tor— a wa.e"al, sponder spEem Rtruartl avatar Di m "ince A2 valc'y1111eaardhalrmmnm aralwe m . Oily n Gallen rnga[ion Fleads Table - ContraQor enfy head c unt from plan IrT ion Pape rolle d was 2c0 PVC Pipe nm -pressure Lou...ou... Purple coo. I ° Stlledule 40 NO Piot Main lion Purr' tool Ire,p ;on Equipment Tablt Ouannry Symbd Equipment 4 q Tnm 290 OF 04 1- "im o".I Valve: IneG;1 in.gronnd in Pnryld valve tart Ranbvd ETA B srxion mnLToller; m5..4an wm1 where shown. ALL BY 5TING VALVES ARE TO BE REMOVED, ALONG WITH ALL EXISTING SPPoNGERS AND PIPING REAS THAT IS IN IN ASHOWN TO HAVE NEW IRRIGATION. ALL NEW VALVES ARE TO BE INSTALLED IN PLANTER Al VALVES SHOWN ON THIS PUN IN NON -PLANTER LOCATIONS ARE FOR GRAPHIC CLARRY ONLY; AGING AREAS 15 TO DE INSTALLED IN 5CH 40 PVO PIPE OF Ouanhty Symbol Sprmtl=r Meads 14 O IONG5]0Ma<cned Prempika<,on WG -s 4'Sremal Pat<ems 554 4 0 TORO STO Mxcned Preopitatlm Rites 4''—I Patterns EST 57 5 TORO 57. 0.11. Frmphahon Rarer 11F--. l2 dell Trust, BIve1 180 B O TORO 570 Ml PreopP.anonWte, lO5en6 wrtb 12 well ItAlsoory(BWe) 090 a O TORO 570 patella NowletaEmn Rarer ID'Sends with lzaeg T:glec<ory (81u=1 IGO 4 POPLIP SPRAY 5PRINKLER: O TORO 570 Matched Frmpi44on Rrtae 10' Sends wxh 12 dy Tralectory MI.) 360 2 E TORO 570 Matched Foredw"RXS IDEpho Rh 12 del Tr,weay(Glop 270 2 a TORO 570Aider, "Mod, Ries 10' Senn w2E I z deg TraJectory(54x) 240 5 O TORO FLO 51ream Rotor 15 Omni Adrysrabl-'adue Merl 090 11 B TOR03005team prior 150mm AdJusGWe-Radms No¢Ie IRO PVC CCU BO NIPPLE AS REQUIRED) al TuR03005tream Rotor 150mm AdJusGble-RadmS Hassle 270 ALL PIPING THAT IS SHOWN UNDER P Y DIA. NOTE ON IRRIGATION HEADS: ALL NOzzIFS LOCATED ADJACENT TO WAUCWAY5 OR VEHICUUR TRAFFIC ARE TO BE INSTALLED ON G' POP-UP BODIES: ALL OTHER NORIFS ARE TD BE INSTALLED ON 12'BS ARISEILS. NOODLES IN DAWN AREAS ARE TO BF INSTALLED ON 4' FOP -UP BODIES. ALL HEADS AND RISERS ART TO BE INSTALIFD WITH DOUBLE SWING JOINTS. 36 37 mvE am oxen 5 m s pE Oi Ao-MCH UNFAR Hal OF WIRF� WhinOWNMO O2 Wa1EAUFRWF L­N­UU1510E WPIb�J LLL'RR PER 1£cFHO CAP OF NOZZLE 15 TO BE PURPLE. LATERAL LINE W/ PURPLE Z O QTan ie RFan: 'RECYCLEO'WRER ORlxx' w Excusx uu0 Q z -INCH F.e sox w Cl oxo FlmxastNon Q O FINISH ORADEROP OF MULCH ALERT LINE 1 z B 4 B vuilsx nl valves. wall as the label for mtm �"I coxmai 4� All fludM1, p0,, sprinkler hl must be made "'"T"."lasso. POPLIP SPRAY 5PRINKLER: O MAIN LINE OR SLEEVE FINISH GRADE ALERT LINE Z O Qi . Eox wml c014R: W Q LL (.% vE�PLrcs2 j ly J 7. Omck OrAl are allowed, but .,or Heereryded water systems. yV/PURPLE 5 'MIN. 7 12-INCX EIEE O FlNIEX 61ta0E/IOP OF MULCH 8. NO .1 A. backflow pxvenson assembly el be allowed on art reryded water JU,Srl W. �E 1-IWNCN PIC SCX DICO xourt .w0 mnxcs(LENGTH systen All landscape, turf, or uop rtngap0n. PVC CCU BO NIPPLE AS REQUIRED) CONTROL WIRE x B REMrt1E NITTOL Val O SCX w NPPte (DIOSE)ire S ED POWFA SUPPLY Z Q rvx lO4PVC 5CH 40 ELL/LQe Q z . Ful water rs regmred during,mhal pressure [espy. BAS E. 4c Eu 2. All regmred poor to be eamPleted and signed edetate Cori of O5 PVC 5CH 40 STREET ELL treaded water. 9 WC Seal 90 NIPPLE 19, heed Iddon ch Al watu irngahon shall comp"Ift th regmremente of RACE UISIRIC! W,..0O gip..ON IRE Ed.ONNDFnAsLL ox FxcE oP WmxoutxPVC Arrood 0, the Dietride Ults and Reguladmo and county of Ins Ayele, 5CH 40 TEE OR ELL OeparGnent of POHE HnIM. co D Q (1IN_O M1onzomally and I loot vertolly A,th Potaple wafer line dual ng perpe tedwo, over Terri water n ). If a recycled water, To crosses over a potable water c, the reryded wRer Ene shell be mstalird,reide a sleeve wdM1 the sleeve Fare 11 P!C MMNIINE PIPE -PURPLE renmrea aver the "wine watdr line ane rernded aueat 1 o flee, on doth Amo. QW13 Nosfy Jre Yersky at WslnuE Valley Water Butnct ak (909) 595-1268 for ns PVC LATERAL PIPE doet"I0nsand,ntroolons: ple,so pipe prior to backfill: 2)imtul prerourt arporalph. INCH W��N ST PHI LN) L.Axm lm Goanty also dual "reeAnre or ore test the sntem'oefor=avnng dnw pem:anmt elonnenion. For DE1. PND Notify Joe Yersky 0 W.V wO add Dan Carom, Q LA. wunry AN (6261 430-5290, .1 final 'Halloo n - 2 day wnfi®pan. .3 1A vu n 140 Eu191E p,Mp SCN AD TEE oR Eu Ell 14 PC 5CH 10 MDI£ MM1ER0 15 BAC LATERAL PIPE-PURPL£ S CLEAN BACKFILL 1E s"'NOOF LABEL FOR RECLAIMED WATER INCHXWA NEDEG.WYEL ON WALL MOUNTED CONTROLLER POP-UP SPRINKLER TREN011NG DETAIL REMOTE CONTROL VALVE 113 I III lit P tmwnxrcr.am nM.e,mw. ORTN SCALE- 1 u = 1 a.Tr LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION PIAN RECYCLE) WATER NOTES: Q 1. All varve ewes ehan be pmPle plazhd with the wdras'Rnoyoled Water aznntoal Z O the lid. 2- All control .1-E let naw a plorre label att .. AD, a Hurt to wrap with Q Me worts: "tooted Wader Do Net DrmK m Carl art 51amsn. J Z Q 3. All above -ground risers shall be labeled vntn a m1ladhesrve label wtn the same nl valves. wall as the label for mtm Q O Z 4� All fludM1, p0,, sprinkler hl must be made "'"T"."lasso. m 5. All bew grade "ging must be purple are 1. the words "Rose[- Wa[er-Do LIN Z O n I Drak"- IDu applets Eo botF per'mamnt and laemmttent pressux pipe. ''Fns W Q LL (.% regmmment woes not apply tD fittings and risers 6. No hose'oibs ax allowed on reryded ester systems. j ly J 7. Omck OrAl are allowed, but .,or Heereryded water systems. LL W a Omok -,,I—mus, also be placed m purple "lasso valved bores. (_% 8. NO .1 A. backflow pxvenson assembly el be allowed on art reryded water Q systen All landscape, turf, or uop rtngap0n. Z ED cy 9, Sig ns,rdicxmg the use or recycled water are reamred and wll be placed at O N the drsa'e 111 of the DistnR imP�or. approved reeumd } ED Q. Poor to prewure testing, paable water whir an prnsure prmaple dewoo may he temporarily used to estabhsn iThe System must Z Q be IM1= for nose sawlseors Peters wmerth, to recycYd wafer. Q z . Ful water rs regmred during,mhal pressure [espy. 2. All regmred poor to be eamPleted and signed edetate Cori of a treaded water. Q 19, heed Iddon ch Al watu irngahon shall comp"Ift th regmremente of W R- Q Arrood 0, the Dietride Ults and Reguladmo and county of Ins Ayele, cl� ay OeparGnent of POHE HnIM. co D Q Nequved clearance between potable and reryclea utter Imes Is I O kelt M1onzomally and I loot vertolly A,th Potaple wafer line dual ng perpe tedwo, over Terri water n ). If a recycled water, To crosses over a potable water c, the reryded wRer Ene shell be mstalird,reide a sleeve wdM1 the sleeve renmrea aver the "wine watdr line ane rernded aueat 1 o flee, on doth Amo. QW13 Nosfy Jre Yersky at WslnuE Valley Water Butnct ak (909) 595-1268 for ns od" doet"I0nsand,ntroolons: ple,so pipe prior to backfill: 2)imtul prerourt arporalph. All and 3) above -ground mspecson- 2 day mbEoson. L.Axm lm Goanty also dual "reeAnre or ore test the sntem'oefor=avnng dnw pem:anmt elonnenion. For ®^' Notify Joe Yersky 0 W.V wO add Dan Carom, Q LA. wunry AN (6261 430-5290, .1 final 'Halloo n - 2 day wnfi®pan. .3 cta. l PLANT LEGEND �5ry ,mba�T.11alLaataCan�xs. --01T.�e w�lp ow en�z. 5a:"'� ° 15 .1 O =a=d.a r�xrwe or sewn mix. yon i.�ulox .mp smm veee - — N:.l11 .m rtFs Hm'e.mscv a'wn.gma aNaw.ummiaa w:n rg,rr`ury M'u xus^alalcn+ 's'rv+arc sperc O.nc m.m UsM NO EN 10:15'. pl -p of rpa ycuecbR a�'NuoW, meR forevua mg w QW F` I .rtro nglX<Fe nn m'M^MPq w,u�m arca rtF y rt5 .d 9 M of wm9,c o PI, cF N X 11 emP <p ep V11—PI Po 91 I)ym n 1 1 nugvaae gmme ma q, own.v eYan the vl n - W.smceass,Ndsm mnq bss mz amud rge n. , ponandl iFoim�gFlywrte: in oll pints on Ycovme daymwFum <M1ey wercpbn4d. a' �I FSSrN(LONcam �Mf>�E ^1 11 l' ' u 1 15 34 1?0)5-�tl eM - E-712 1433 36 WSW waiOFFICE 3 13 32 ma4 1231 37 5 11 30 mgmm All aFt1Cc ® 6 7 ` 10 29 TT] o �c 13'24 S.F. 1,eee S.F. 9 egg 28 38 ® 1 8f neo of P6 m5�1 OFFICE t•siVl niaa-m. o.,... 13�ra'.ea 169 nsi, 1,910 9.E OPJSGu DERCE IJx4�eu IBea �, se et 1.401 S.F. �scr_ Y 2 22 23 24 7' ,m 25 aPis.wi 1 1 18 19 t�tq�e' �e�nOee'eplee*e�e7„.��r�"�daaoac1Le�QS.s�'e+�ilAe'��►e^w�orer®li0s-ewsee��eLeJ.Io.T��° �° e1°0.-fS r1101 a Ehh"�Wm qqq 71,"US ' ��p�OLw• ovTo-°°e°st - l ir WTI WA5t11NGTON 5TPEET NORM SONE- I `= I0'-0' LAND5GAPE PLANTING PLAN z 0 Z Q O} Z CO Z 2' W<o U U Q tLwU Om d 0ISo U Z z m'Ds m. 11.113 neem 3 ao yemaaa .3L-2 m 3 �+ TH15 ONE TREE 15 A 12'-14'5WEET GU LIOUIDAM5AR 5T1RACIFLUA AND WILLI RETAINED. THE5E POUR(4)TREEi ARE 14'-16' DfODAR CEDARS, CEDRV5 DEODARA, AND WILL BE RETANED. SYCAMORE AND WILL BE RETAINED, FROM RIGHTIO-Eff WILL BE REMOVEDDURIN6 FILE CONSTRUCTOFION OF THE HPNDICAP RAMP. I NORTH SCALE -I— I0'-0' EXI5TING TREE LOCATION PLAN 0 Z 0 5o. y—z cc) z= 0 U U Q 0 K U m 5} LOm Z 10 0 Uzo Q Q x w�Q co w0 ae. m.nT aew r -Toro I,.— q — IDb.n L-3 ma 2ND FLOOR PLAN n OIST FLOOR PLAN n C D/A :REATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES 4WiWWn. I.wC .. P.N •.mealanlal F. ®Btd91O 1]6IHEM'.LM$ PIyNI�eVy.0%X `tpyry'YO Byf 're MeiSnPemale4 ]�'. �,o. , BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER fifi0&9GGNYDNRDM WANCND RARG91]& Lllenl: BREA CANYON INVESTMENT, LLC 1ST & 2ND FLOOR PLAN CDA Piale[I No, f}11 e: fF8;PD19 Pryefe: MNNW6 PRee6:tl0a' 9. v; ffJ ELPLAN CHECN CORRLMION DADEO OCT. 11, 2012 A, PUN CHECK CORRECTION DATED DEC. 20, 2012 PUN CHECK CORRECTION 3 DATED FEB. 11, 2013 PUN CHECK CORRECTION 5 DATED NAR. 0, 2013 O o""A' .wmP ne.: A-101 OROOF PLAN l� C D/A CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES PiNlbcWfe. IFrleiprCUlpn. FannYlp r.malsnlm F. ®81dB1R Haase bwmx CNy v11MINy.GPIVB r�ewR� CypgAIO By GNre h¢Sh MrmNsPv "".2 BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER E'W BRFA G1MWIflM0 WW019&R G%R9 LC.,I: BREA CANYON INVESTMENT, LLC 11D, 'CIEU1,17EFF u.. �. ruuswr 1sx. ..mP rm: ROOPPLAN CDA P�oje of Na. 1310 onn rta l,mn vne.e: nAwulro 0 liedx"D mII„, n1- QPLAN CKECK CORRECTION 1 DATED OCT. 11, 2012 PLAN CHECK CORRECTION DATED DEC. 20, 2012 ZLPUN CHECK CORRECTION 3 DATED FEE. 11. 2013 5 PUN CHECK CORRECTION DATED MAR. B, 401, l-, NK, A-102 KEYNOTES EXTERIOR LIGHTING 13 ENRRDOOR OIXtFAIOR CEMENT PLASTER - FINE SAND FINISH COLOR MATCH DUNN EOWARBS (SEE ODIOR OR SCHEDULE A-501) O AtGCORONU FINISH CDSMDS RUCK ] WINDOW (SEE WINDOW SCHEDULE A -5U1) GE6056 BOFFNO HEAD TV 9 ANODIZED ALUMINUM TRIM STORMONT WINDOWS - OPERABLE. DOUBLE PANE LOW -E 15 O MECHANICAL VENT (SEE MEP FOR DETAILS) AND NON -REFLECTIVE GLASS. EXIFRIDA CEMENT PWYER - FINE SAND FINISH COLOR MATCH DUNN EDWAROS O DD O BICYCLE PARKING (EAHEA SHORT OR LONG PERM) O SPANDREL GLAZING DES]6I ADVEATCH IN PWINUM TRV 46 eONEOOFTEE LWi SI SUB �9 xAle (INSIDE) OWf.EST EL EVATION (BACK) FACING BREA CANYON ROAD O NORTH ELEVATION (RIGHT) 1D EXTERIOR LIGHTING 13 ENRRDOOR (SEE ODIOR OR SCHEDULE A-501) 11 Aq' REVEAL 14 ELECTRICAL PANELS OCLEAR 1Z ANODIZED ALUMINUM TRIM STORMONT WINDOWS - OPERABLE. DOUBLE PANE LOW -E 15 O MECHANICAL VENT (SEE MEP FOR DETAILS) AND NON -REFLECTIVE GLASS. (WINDOW PRODUCT SIMILAR TO UI 11200 OR TRUST O EAST ELEVATION (FRONT) (FRONT) SOUTH ELEVATION (LEFT) FACING WASHINGTON STREET CD/A :REATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES N AXecwre T.®9188101 Oeepn. GMrmlrq F.BID81181@ nee e. Hwwmx cb.almoaWuelw .....I.m..2. :W>rgnl®ayawn. w.'R� Avmmee, m[. wopm: BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER RVERAGEARG IPM ouMorm aw. cAane Ghent: BREA CANYON INVESTMENT, LLC C I*>rm ill, D% CA1 �E OlexinB Mlle: ELEVATIONS COA PIafe[INu 1115 Bele: .1, ED PM1ese: PNNAMG seAzd Ly: -- D e y -Lk be: A QPLAN CHECK CORRECTION 1 GATED OCL 11, 2012 2 PLAN CHECK CORREC110N DATED DEC, 20, 2012 QPLAN CHECK CO2013 ON ] DATED FEB. fit 201] Olewine Nu: A-201 BEAST VIEW FROM RARKWG LOT KEYNOTES Of%EERIOI CEMENT PLASTER - FINE SAND FINCH -I HINDU WINI O N (SEE WINDOW SCHEDULE A-501) OLDER MATCH DAN EDWARDS O CUSMOS BLACK DE,56 BUfEALO HEAD LRY 9 OE%IEAIOR CEMENT PIASTER - FINE SAND FINISH BICYCLE PARKING (EITHER SHORE OR LONG TERM) O SPANDREL GLAZING COLOR MATCH DUNN EDWARDS O DE6361 CWERm IN PLATINUM IAV 46 OALUCOBOND FINISH O {>'^^^'�'°C O REAR (INSIDE) BONE WHITE CODL Q 1 2. 41, 2 1T -T- GO So V$ 5 u�.+ns •+a 3 5 .,, �yf_.Nk'.IK3N`'.N�"'I.,'�.ss - ,wC y",e-,fes 10 EXTERIOR LIGHTING it Y" REVEAL <14>ELECIRICAL PANE15 CLEAR ANSI NUMINOM TRIM PANE, LOW -E 15 MECHANICAL VEA' (SEE MEP FOR DETAILS) Q1 STOREFRONT WINDOWS - OPERABLE, DOUBLE AND NON-REPEECTIVE CUSS. •N �BACK FACING BREA CANYON "•'• T (WIND,, MMU SIMMR TO USLLCM II2GO OR 1166) 3 N^"ORTH ELEVATION (RIGHT) WEST VIEW ON BREA CANYON ROAD 5 u�.+ns •+a 13 E%IERIOR WCR A-501) 10 EXTERIOR LIGHTING (SEE DOOR SCHEWLE it Y" REVEAL <14>ELECIRICAL PANE15 CLEAR ANSI NUMINOM TRIM PANE, LOW -E 15 MECHANICAL VEA' (SEE MEP FOR DETAILS) Q1 STOREFRONT WINDOWS - OPERABLE, DOUBLE AND NON-REPEECTIVE CUSS. T (WIND,, MMU SIMMR TO USLLCM II2GO OR 1166) EASTELEVATION FRON 2 su�„�-,a CD/A CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES IMM1aWA.IrneMDWpn. PYrmW t.®elvlm 001vim ,"EI prydlMuvry,GBiMB v.MxuWmmn fupyrplEOByGea�iwh,piAwMas, m,. SOUTH ELEVATION (LEFT) FACING WASHINGTON STREET IKI..0; BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER NAMOND&R.."RA GIIe01: BREA CANYON INVESTMENT, LLC Iieeoe Rawl,wossm stamp: R—, COLORED ELEVATIONS CDA 1111-1 Nu. I'll L,Ie F®.1.1013 ".A MNNiNG tl 9l: wne2Y-CGl. Pio: evl N¢' QPLAN CHECK CORRECTION 1 DARK OGT. 11. 2012 QPVN CHECK CORRECTION 2 DATED DEC. 20, 2012 Q3PIAN CHECK CORRECTION DRIED EEB, 11, 2013 PIANCHECK CORRECTION DATED MAR. S. 2013 C1. wi11.: A-201 C (1(1lIR PrO., IIF DOOR NOTES O 0 O (D O WINDOW SCHEDULE CO. FlEtfARKS MEADOW Eil. DOOR NOTES O 0 O (D O WINDOW SCHEDULE WINDow NOTES d[uwnwm mwm euna wrm�rvu�rrcua wvn[a�µ,'mm csr wuunmlm CD/A CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES ArThw9ve.IMelror Wagn. %mnirq i. @BBI9BIN F. @1813BIOt t]6)dE hvNGR PryNIMURt U81Y xw.v.lbw2vm C¢pyigMOBy GeaMe W¢yviP¢m[sM1¢,Pc Prole[1: BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER fi'ABRE4 WNYGN RJFO G1IMGNG&R,G911� Lllenl: BREA CANYON INVESTMENT, LLC �G�rz:J4�lty, µ."•IQ m *rm 'tl O�ewinBT111e: DOOR SCHEDULE LGA PrIHRNn rzu II.I.: rra 1, eau PM1e¢e: PUNNM'G CLseX�d Oy- l:n L.'k Q1PENN CHECK CORRECTION GATED OCT. $1,2D12 3QPUN CHECK CORRECTION DATED DEC. 20, 2012 PUN CHECK CORRECTION AE, RATED FEB. It, 2013 QPUN CHECK CORRECTION 5 RATED MAR, B, 2013 Grewane No: A-501 MEADOW Eil. ,D) LOCATION TYPE SO,, WNRIAL FINISH COLOR WATRIAL U VV.UE SAW 'WE TAX SEEMONOODINOTES WINDow NOTES d[uwnwm mwm euna wrm�rvu�rrcua wvn[a�µ,'mm csr wuunmlm CD/A CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES ArThw9ve.IMelror Wagn. %mnirq i. @BBI9BIN F. @1813BIOt t]6)dE hvNGR PryNIMURt U81Y xw.v.lbw2vm C¢pyigMOBy GeaMe W¢yviP¢m[sM1¢,Pc Prole[1: BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER fi'ABRE4 WNYGN RJFO G1IMGNG&R,G911� Lllenl: BREA CANYON INVESTMENT, LLC �G�rz:J4�lty, µ."•IQ m *rm 'tl O�ewinBT111e: DOOR SCHEDULE LGA PrIHRNn rzu II.I.: rra 1, eau PM1e¢e: PUNNM'G CLseX�d Oy- l:n L.'k Q1PENN CHECK CORRECTION GATED OCT. $1,2D12 3QPUN CHECK CORRECTION DATED DEC. 20, 2012 PUN CHECK CORRECTION AE, RATED FEB. It, 2013 QPUN CHECK CORRECTION 5 RATED MAR, B, 2013 Grewane No: A-501 F, \A -"A5 I i 1 V t7 1 t.1i 4 ..i l AEE SITE PLAN SCUE1ne+�'P KEY NOTE5 © AVIIUI4NI6 WM NWff 91Gtt® PRM Q TarWwo Ve T U Tn3mieun% ©RQm T UMTm UM C D/A CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES AMIbNue. Inwbr Cegpn. Pbnmy v®aWnm s.®ssmax +r�Ws.rarex OgNllYupyGBl}IG vini:.aMcmn GawaW®er �. m,plw�ama, m� v,oleoC BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER OSOBPFAGM9NP640 MRWlM M4GM]69 C, -f: BREA CANYON INVESTMENT, LLC HYccoN3ULi0GINEFR3,lx „•=G. O,awln9 Title: SITE PLAN con woTem rv¢ Tv, Oefa: F6wyI,N13 9VMpIG n[V5 KK .......................... PHOTOMETRIC PL.AN� ICD/A CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES NtllMxwn. Inosbr Meipi. PInMq T &CAYI% F�813HIN � HEIMLdSt QFNHaWg GBRIB oiwcmn CpryiyAl®By Cnetire OuipnNwp[Ny4r, BREA CANYON BUSINESS CENTER fi%6REAC9NNIxFh40 CMMWiOdN,GN)A9 Llie�l: BREA CANYON INVESTMENT, LLC .,_:nv�:umyan :vcl>F�mlmrte+amxe xvc mxsuvwe vlcwe=_xs, Ine. us a ovx O[awing iilla: PHOTOMETRIC PLAN LUA P.oI.[I xn IN oa le: kMregtlol] Pn[[.: evlwwc Hc KK I:A KK J U 'Z M (0 r U LLJ F- LL Q L0 r L LJ d LU Q t - Z D J 0 Y ry W J U H LLI ui z F- 0 Q = o a f - U W 4 NV� Z m A Y ry W J U H LLI ui z F- 0 Q = o a f - U W IL O U N 4 7 N U > N O 4 Z 3 N N � c 3 o N 0 m c N N o U O L N '-0 N m Nc C -0 U O U Q N _ °' To Z m O U) Q � N 0� Q z 0 of Of o LL Q 0 Q IL O U N 4 7 N U > N O 4 Z 3 N N � c 3 o N 0 m c N N o U O L N '-0 N m Nc C -0 U O U Q N _ °' To