HomeMy WebLinkAbout5/13/2003 Minutes - Adjourned Regular MeetingMINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF
MAY 13, 2003
CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Herrera called t e Adjo jrned
Regular City Council Meeting to order at 4:34 p.m. in the Room CC -8 f the
South Coast Air Quality Management District/Government Center, 21 E 65 E.
Copley Dr., Diamond Bar, CA.
ROLL CALL: Council Members Chang, O Connor,
and Mayor Herrera. Mayor Pro Tem Huff arrived at 4:55 p.m.
Also present were: Linda Lowry, City Manager; J,
DeStefano, Deputy City Manager; David Doyle; Deputy City IV anager; I
Liu, Public Works Director; Bob Rose, Community ServicesDirector; I
Magnuson, Finance Director; Lynda Burgess, City Clerk; Kim Drews, S
Management Analyst; Fred Alamolholda, Senior Engineer; T resa Are
Senior Management Analyst; Sharon Gomez, Management A lyst and
Blakey, Public Information Manager.
2. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION:
2.1.1 LEGISLATIVE SUBCOMMITTEE MATTERS— Report y Jim
Legislative Liaison.
2.1 .1 AB 1221 (STEINBERG AND CAMPBELL) BALANED
COMMUNITIES ACT (Continued from May 6, 2003.) - Continu d to
May 20, 2003.
Mr. Clarke reported that the hearing initially scheduled for
May 14,
had
been postponed until the next Wednesday, May 21. If
the bill does
not get out of committee by the end of May 2003, it dies
The Sta
a is
advocating taking away 50% of cities' sales tax revenue
and repla
Ing
it with what they are calling a "property tax backfill", whicwould7
me
from the Educational Revenue Augmentation fund.
He briefly reported that the formula does not work for all Cities and
a study conducted by Hinderliter, using 1993 to 200C tax figL
indicated Diamond Bar would have received approximat gly $100.
to $200,000 less revenue in each of those years had A 3 1221 b
implemented.
It is a fluctuating formula that is locked -in using the pror erty tax to
for 2004. The market is volatile and in that there is no gL arantee I lat
this legislation benefits the City, but quite the opposite. TI ie legisla ion
actually takes away funds allocated at the local level tc use for he
State's own general fund.
MAY 13, 2003 PAGE .2 CITY COUNCIL
CM/Lowry suggested that the matter be continued to Tuesday, May
20, giving Council the opportunity to review the revised material. It
was noted that the League is adamantly opposed to the legislation
and a number of cities have taken adverse positions. Mr. Clarke
stated that even though the hearing was rescheduled, the City's
legislative lobbyist, Gonsalves & Son, is working hard to defeat the
bill.
C/Zirbes was interested in moving forward but preferred to wait for
MPT/Huff to arrive to the meeting. C/O'Connor was not comfortable
voting on something she had not had an opportunity to study and
absorb. If the balance of the Council wanted to take a vote, she would
step outside. _ C/Chang was opposed to the legislation and stated that
the State tends to resolve its problems at the expense. of local
government. He commented that regardless of what other cities were
doing, if this Council wants to show its opposition, he would be okay
with taking a vote at this time.
CM/Lowry briefly explained that the State's proposal to use 2004 as
its base -year allows Diamond Bar only a 50% return on any financial
enticements used to encourage developments and minimize the
capturing of future sales tax. The language of the bill as written is
complicated beyond reason.
MPT/Huff arrived at 4:55 p.m.
After a brief summary of the discussion by M/Herrera, MPT/Huff
commented on the benefit of hearing Sacramento's feedback first-
hand citing that Sacramento was still trying to address the real
problem. It just doesn't yet work for Diamond Bar. Part of the
problem is the City is anticipating retail and the City is working hard to
get it,
If the State had a mechanism for averaging five years out instead of
using the current base it would more likely capture future sales tax
growth and take into account those cities that have tried to be
responsible under existing laws. Neighboring cities come out on the
plus side,. Diamond Bar is still. growing. And yet their councils have
consistently fought retail growth and only included residential growth.
M/Herrera said that therein lies the quandary should Council act now
or go to Sacramento and get more information and take action next
Tuesday.
MPT/Huff suggested that a step in the right direction would be to get
away from sales tax to property tax and get feedback from
Sacramento to find out whether they would be receptive to something
that would work for more cities.
1
1
MAY 13, 2003
PAGE 3
Mr. Clarke said that if the Council waited to take
Tuesday, the resolution could be taken to Sacr
morning and presented to the offices of the Appropri
members.
Council concurred to continue the matter to May 20,
2.1.2 SB 537 (ROMERO) — SOLID WASTE MANAGEM
from May 6, 2003)
Mr. Clarke presented Council with a copy of a
Board of Supervisors opposing SB 537.
C/O'Connor talked about an article in the newspaper tc
that the City of Industry had changed the language or
be restricted as well.
COUNCIL
next
next
(Continued
m from the
whict said
ed them to
Mr. Clarke stated that the bill was amended late last night ani I the
language has not yet been added to the legislation but that he had
obtained a list of the amendments that were madEl. In se tion
44013.a, the amendment restricts the Grand Central re cling/tra isfer
station in the City of Industry.
MPT/Huff pointed out that the article indicated that Indu ry was illing
to do that because there is a common feeling that the are try] g to
restrict the County landfill and not the transport station in their itV.
According to Los Angeles County Sanitation, there is an applic tion
by Grand Central to raise their daily transferable tonnage to 5 000
tons a day, which would be more than what is proposed for Puente
Hills. The theory is that if Grand Central had obtained the new pe Tnit,
they would have been able to make more money. Ob ]ously, ]tas
not fair and LA County decided that Grand Central wo Id rema n at
the March 2001 limit of 1500 tons per day.
Mr. Clarke indicated that Gonsalves would also t to kill this
legislation. While it did pass out of committee with these
amendments, the prognosis for the bill is not good.
In response to C/O'Connor's inquiry as to why Gon alves wuld
attempt to kill the bill when they sent out a message to support it, Mr.
Clarke responded that this was done prior to the amendments.
C/O'Connor reminded Council that she took a position ir favor of this
bill at the Sanitation District on direction from Gonsalve ' staff. Ir an
attempt to acquire all the pertinent information relating tc this bill, 5he
suggested they study the bill more closely.
MAY 13, 2003 PAGE 4 CITY COUNCIL
Mr. Clarke said that C/O'Connor's reasoning was correct at the time.
However, the bill has been stripped of everything having to do with
expansion and building of new facilities, and focuses on Grand Central
and Puente Hills and the amount of times that they can move in -and -
out. It's a totally different bill. And it's not doing exactly what the
author intended it to do.
CM/Lowry said staff's recommendation would be "no action" at this
point.
2.2 DISCUSSION: CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND OBJECTIVES.
M/Herrera reported that she and subcommittee member MPT/Huff agreed
that Council needed to first review the goals that it adopted last year and
determine how many were accomplished before determining next year's
goals. CM/Lowry commented on the importance for Council to dialogue with
staff as to the goals' creation, status, and how they were accomplished or not
accomplished, as it is staff that has to make them happen.
CITY COUNCIL GOALS WITH ONGOING OBJECTIVES FOR FY 2002-
2003:
CM/Lowry stated that the same format was being used as in the past, with
an update in the middle column. The column on the right contains other
comments that staff feels should lead us into further discussion such as to
whether the matter should be carried into the next year. Staff is seeking
direction from Council as to what each goal entails and are the Council and
staff on the same page visioning how to carry the goal into the next year's
budget or the year after that.
Goal Finalize Plans for Community/Senior Center-, Commence Construction
of Facility and Design Schematic Plans for Library.
Obiective - "Community/Senior Center" — construction is proceeding. Next
year's goal would include the operations and the opening costs. Monies for
opening, operations, and purchase of fixtures and furnishings were not
included in the budget but will be coming to the Council in the form of a
Decision Package to be presented at the next meeting. It was questioned as
to Council seeing the Senior Center as remaining an objective on next year's
Goals and Objectives or does Council see it being absorbed with construction
of the center ending.
C/Chang agreed that this goal should be refined to create a policy for use of
the facility by the community and seniors.
_Obiective - "Actively pursue alternative forms of library funding (i.e. bonds,
assessment districts and state/federal grants) and hire a grant writer to
search for funds, explore the cost/benefit (feasibility) of seceding from the
n
1
MAY 13, 2003
PAGE 5
County for Library services"— staff is recommending that
consider withdrawing from the County Library system and sul
grant applications.
C/Chang recommended additional study sessions to discuss
whether Council wanted to move forward in the pursuit of g
In response to MPT/Huff, DCM/Doyle explained that
Objectives state that the City was looking at withdrawing fro
August or September rather than in July in order to make su
application is substantially complete and the operating
accomplished before withdrawing. Staff will be preparing
direction by July.
In response to M/Herrera regarding a Study Session to re-ei
direction the City should go, DCM/Doyle suggested that the
a couple of months.
CITY COUNCIL
City should
stand alone
Proie t and
Goal(
the COL
that the
and
v in
greem nt is
move iidi that
to as tp the
ncil w it for
Staff has requested financial information from the County regarding the
amount Diamond Bar is paying into the system and how it is b aing sper it, as
well as the revenue being generated by the City for the Coun y.
Additionally, staff needs to develop a "plan of service" for the new libr ry in
order to understand staffing needs. At that point, staff c uld givthe
information to an outside service -provider and have them co it out.
MPT/Huff concurred that it would be good to have a study
information had been gathered.
Obiective - "Develop concept of teen program" — CM/Lowry sta dthat s
recommendation is to move the objective to implementation of the Y
Master Plan Goal.
M/Herrera explained that, historically, when Council Member submit
goals, staff looks at the list and categorizes them.
Objective - "Study alternate uses of library site if funding fails `— C%
pointed out that, at this point, the funding has not failed so the Goal
stay on the list.
DCM/Doyle also indicated that, if the City gets the funding
Library, the goal should include reuse of the present library sits
commented that the Fire Department had priority over the cur
' DCM/Doyle explained that the Fire Department has discuss(
current site, but the Library District actually owns the current
they publicly stated that the Fire Department would have to purr
from them.
for the
the
ra
use ofthe
e. In fact,
se the site
MAY 13, 2003 PAGE 6 CITY COUNCIL
C/O'Connor stated that the City has the money to build a library but the
question is funding the operations. She inquired as to the City's ultimate
intent in the event the City does get the bond.
DCM/Doyle said that when the application is submitted, we will know what it
would cost to operate the library and the Council and the County have to
make a statement to the Bond Board that we would be running a library for
40 years. Council should have all of the operating costs up front before
going into the Bond Act application process.
Goal: Consider Ado tion and Im lementation of Economic Develo meat
and/or Strategic Plan
Obiective - Phase i "Identify unmet retail needs; target revitalization of
existing commercial areas; attract commercial development; consider
strategies with Project Area; prioritize commercial areas for economic
development opportunities; examine the feasibility of creating a new
redevelopment project area".
Phase II "Consider strategies without redevelopment; utilize elements of
economic plan from Kosmont study; work to pass redevelopment legislation
and support other measures allocating stable funding for cities, such as
through property taxes; creation of an `Economic Assistance Program' to
formulate alternative methods to finance economic development (use of
money or bonds to replace lost; redevelopment funding)."
DCM/DeStefano said that the Redevelopment Project Area concept did not
succeed. Staff conducted a roundtable discussion with business -savvy
individuals in September, with the results provided to Council in October. It
was apparent that focus should be placed on the two vacant pieces of
property in the City — Site D and the hospital site, and The Country Hills
Towne Center, as well as focus on Kmart.
This has evolved into a continuing quest for a grocery store at Country Hills
and possible uses in the future that may be residential rather than retail. Site
D is being considered by the School District as a possible site for freeway
oriented/neighborhood shopping center to fill existing voids in that area.
DCM/DeStefano responded to C/O'Connor that about two years ago, Council
wanted to look at Site D as a freeway -oriented retail commercial opportunity.
It is important for Council to either affirm or redirect this position as staff
intends to market the site as a 20 -acre potential for a retail project at the
upcoming National Developers Conference. At this point, the City's position
is that the site should be retail.
DCM/DeStefano commented that the School District is interested in more
residential and at this point it may or may not offer a compromise. MPT/Huff
stated that the school district was interested in maximizing the dollar and felt
MAY 13, 2003 PAGE.7 Cl"
it would be through housing.
C/O'Connor questioned the City's intent to market the property M
knowing the School District's intentions. DCM/DeStefano r sponde
there is an opportunity being currently vacant, and staff would like to a
that opportunity in the current "hot" market. Staff knows of si nfficont
tax producers that want to locate on Site D; even though the roperty
is not interested, the City is, in marketing the property. The sane thing
true for a couple of other sites in the City, such as the Waln t Valley
site.
COUNCIL
that
M/Herrera said that one of the reasons the City is aggressively marketing
these sites is that the City needs $1,000,000 in new sales tax in order to be
in a position to afford the ongoing maintenance for the new
Community/Senior Center and Library.
C/O'Connor said that a number of residents have proposed hat Site be
considered for location of a sports complex.
DCM/DeStefano reiterated the importance for staff to know Cou oil's
direction so that marketing energies are maximized for potential developers,
as well as staff. Staff could focus its energies on other sites in the City for a
sports complex.
C/Chang, in response to C/O'Connor, stated that the property owner for Site
D doesn't really care what type of facilities go onto the site, they are looking
for funds in the area of $15,000,000 and $18,000,000. He could certainly
understand the community's desire to have a swimming p ol, a sports
complex, but everything has a priority and the current Prionty is the
Community/Senior Center and the Library. He commentec that it VVas
important for the City to focus on finding commercial retail s lutions f r its
vacant property in order to ensure an ongoing revenue strearr and provide
a more secure financial future for the City. The administrate n fee of the
Community/Senior Center has been projected at $750,000 ar d the Lib ary
cost would double that. Regardless, it is estimated that the City needs
approximately $1,000,000 more in annual income to cover these costs_
DCM/DeStefano commented that there is also an opportunity to deve!c p a
retail center on the current Calvary Chapel property. Staff was focusing on
the hospital piece just above it and that appears to be leaning toward a
residential opportunity with a small office development. There is more
interest on the bottom portion of the property for retail, and there is a ell -
known developer with an exclusive to do the development. That portion of
the four sites has shifted a bit but in a positive direction. Staff sees WE as
an ongoing objective so that the City can move on to revitalizinC some of the
centers.
MAY 13, 2003 PAGE 8 CITY COUNCIL
CM/Lowry said she didn't know whether the feasibility of creating a new
redevelopment project area would continue to be carried forward with the
State's unraveling of redevelopment and sales tax benefits.
DCM/DeStefano said staff would recommend deleting this item because the
climate is unfavorable. Both sides are working hard to cause redevelopment
to go away or make it so onerous that it's not worth pursuing in project areas.
In addition, it is difficult to produce enough blight in this City to meet the test
to generate enough revenue to support creation of a project area.
CM/Lowry said the City made a big step by creating the Financing Authority
and that was part of her concern regarding AB 1221. The City committed
itself to having funds on hand to do economic development, and, if it was
going to end up that the City was not going to get its portion of sales tax out
of it, the City would have to change considerably its approach on nearly
everything. This would include the first phase on how the City was going to
develop the properties.
Obiective - "Establish supermarket for Country Hills Towne Center and/or
.south end."
DCM/DeStefano stated that C/Zirbes has helped to coordinate, through his
contacts, business meetings with members of that business -industry. As a
result, staff has spoken with about 20 different grocery store operators that
have stores in this marketplace; with limited success. Staff is hoping to gain
interest in that center at the International Council of Shopping Centers
conference. It also appears that a grocery store could be a significant portion
of a Site D development because it's a site above the street and even with
a lot of grading, and it's a corner location. If that happens, staff would look
for a higher -end use with the same kind of regional advertising on a weekly
basis, the same kind of high customer counts that a grocery store provides.
This would also be done for the Country Hills Center.
C/Zirbes said Site D is a prime piece of freeway real estate that the objective
should be to put the market in Country Hills rather than creating another
center of the same type on Site D_ Even with the site's grade difficulties,
getting a market back into the Center would be beneficial because it would
satisfy the need at the south end of town and would open up the opportunity
for sales tax generating businesses on Site D. The School District seems
determined to have a retail center at Site D. He would like to see a sports
complex there as much as anyone else but we don't have $15 million to build
it.
C/Chang stated that the community wanted a high-end shopping center and
restaurant available and that Site D would offer the highest and best use site _
for such a project. It's been nearly impossible to attract a grocery store to the
Towne Center because of competition with Wal-Mart.
1
1
MAY 13, 2003
.. - ._PAGE 9
CI1TY COUNCIL
M/Herrera understood that the Council concurred that Sit D should be
commercial.CM/Lowry confirmed that pursuit of a supermarket for the
Country Hills Towne Center would remain an ongoing item.
Objective - Conduct a business town forum/open houa to di cuss
business/economic development.
DCM/DeStefano confirmed that a portion of this has been co
ple#ed.
Staff
is uncertain as to what the Council intended for a town foru
open house.
C/O'Connor suggested that one idea for a town forum/open h
use would
be
to display maps of the City's shopping areas and ask. what thE
residents
had
in mind for development, revamping, etc. DCM/DeStefano said
that thiE
may
have been appropriate a year or two ago but may not be app
opriate today.
It would be staff's recommendation to remove that section oi
the item
from
the list.
C/O'Connor pointed out that the City's view of the type of de
would generate sales tax may completely differ from the re;
the type of uses they would like to see. CM/Lowry said that
the Council's desires, as well as, possible differences in
desires of the consumer against those of a fiscal manager.
may completely compete with each other. It may be contrary
perhaps, but it would be in keeping with the goal to make th
commercial decisions.
C/O'Connor stated given a choice of a Home Depot or a sl
Site D, she believes the residents would choose the sl
DCM/Doyle questioned the revenue source that would be
type project.
M/Herrera pointed out that if the City does not bring in the $•`
that Home Depot represents, the City won't have the mon
afford the Youth Master Plan, or a sports complex or, even
to build it without the money to operate it.
C/Chang commented that a business complex could provide
of entertainment as well as retail in a center that has good free
At this time, people spend money in other cities to get ente
services.
DCM/DeStefano said that with a high sales tax producer, Diamc
reap the reward, or it could go in an adjacent City and Diamo
get nothing. We could do the same with a sports complex or
athletic facility. The City could put it in an athletic facility on c
or it could locate it on an adjacent piece of property by enteric
City effort. At least Diamond Bar would have the opportunity to
revenue to run the facility with the limited land the City has left.
that Diamond Bar has Industry -property on three sides and th,
elopmen that
dents' view of
tall discu 3sed
)alancin the
Those d sire
quality life,.
most prL dent
is comp' x at
is comp ex_
ceded fo this
,000 tax ase
to be ab a to
rse woul J be
►arious types
ay expos ure.
ainment and
nd Bar w uld
id Bar would
some so t of
big -,box site,
f into a ic int-
;apture base
-le explai ied
iy have
MAY 13, 2003 PAGE 10 CITY COUNCIL
thousands of vacant acres that present an opportunity for some of the other
kinds of uses that are needed, and have been asked for, but don't generate
revenue, thus leaving Diamond Bar with the land to generate the revenue to
help pay for it.
MPT/Huff said that some of this discussion represents an opportunity for
educating the residents. They have identified where they would like to see
the sports complex if cost were no object but the reality is, cost is an object.
The best way to get the amenities is to develop the revenue streams.
M/Herrera requested Council's pleasure as to staff's recommendation to
deleting the objective conduct a business town forum/open house".
C/Chang pointed out that he did not want to jeopardize the relationship with
the Chamber of Commerce. M/Herrera gave assurance that Diamond Bar
regards the Chamber as part of its family, however the item will be deleted.
CM/Lowry said that even with the removal of this item from the list, the first
item at the top of page 3 would ensure C/Chang's objective.
Objective 'Work with the Chamber of Commerce, business owners,
residents and management companies to seek the following: a national chain
(middle to upper level) restaurant; businesses to fill vacancies, conduct a
survey of residents to determine what businesses would be best for the City"
— ongoing.
6/O'Connor questioned if the Council's Chamber Subcommittee meets with
the Chamber Economic Development Subcommittee. DCM/DeStefano
responded that the Chamber Subcommittee has been inactive until just
recently --the last three months or so --and they have met only with City staff,
CM/Lowry and him.
C/O'Connor explained that the Council has a Chamber Liaison Subcommittee
(C/Zirbes and C/Chang) and wondered if that Subcommittee was also
included in the Chamber Economic Development Committee in the meetings.
C/Zirbes responded "no."
in response to M/Herrera, DCM/DeStefano indicated that staff views this
matter as ongoing.
Objective — "Revisit sign ordinance related to the percentage of non-English
characters."
DCM/DeStefano explained that the City Attorney's stance prevents the City
from prohibiting non-English characters on signs. The leading and current
case occurred 10 years ago, which involved the Asian -American Business
Group vs. Pomona; wherein Pomona mandated that English be the only
language on signs. Diamond Bar would be hardpressed to accomplish this
goal. Cities that have contemporary ordinances read very similar to Diamond
Bar.
MAY 13, 2003 PAGE .11 CITY COUNCIL
C/O.'Connor said she never meant this goal to be interpreted tl iat there ould
be no foreign language on signs at all. M/Herrera agreedSome f the
issues she hears are that residents feel that English should, a. the very least,
be the same size as the foreign language.
MPT/Huff stated that the current Diamond Bar ordinance is r Elective of the
best legal opinion available. DCM/DeStefano said that therein lies the
difficulty staff finds in attempting to address the objective. The old cod and
old policy was 50/50. The new code doesn't say that — a direct res It of
caselaw and direct opinion of the City Attorney.
C/O'Connor commented that she remembered it as a percenlage issue and
that the letters should be no more than 2 inches high. D M/DeSt fano
explained that the percentage issue has been out of the code since mid -
1999. There is a requirement that there be some sort of a ge eric
encapsulation of what the sign says; it has to be on the sign n Englis and
with no smaller than 4 -inch letters. That is more of a public sai ety issue than
anything else.
DCM/DeStefano responded to C/Chang that there has been some op nion
expressed by the Chamber of Commerce, as well as others, that t iere
should be less foreign characters and more English in the s gn progr 1m.
That's where the City has been moving but with difficulty from a first
Amendment perspective.
When questioned by C/0 -Connor as to whether there was any law that
dictated that a certain percentage of the sign be in English, DC M/DeSte ano
responded "no."
C/Zirbes commented that the majority of the sign -face should be in English
and in the event of size limitation, the limit should be placed on the second
language. He cited the signs along Colima to be hodge-pod a and do not
make people feel welcome. There needs to be a balance within the
community's diversity. He heard that in San Marino, the percentage is 900.
He said he may have been the one to bring this matter forward in our last
Goals and Objectives and the purpose was to see that Diamc nd Bar avoid
a hodge-podge of signs. DCM/DeStefano said that staff is st II working on
this issue and will continue to obtain contemporary ordinanc s from o her
cities:
In response to C/O'Connor, DCM/DeStefano stated that theQty was and
continues to administer the program by policy. According tote Code, the
sign can be in foreign characters with the appropriate translate n.
In response to C/Chan
po g, DCM/DeStefano explained that Diamond Bar's de
is fine in terms of the Pomona case because it is being done for public safety
purposes. M/Herrera concluded that staff continues to work with the Crity
Attorney on this matter and Council looks forward to a recomrr endation for
MAY 13, 2003 PAGE 12 CITY COUNCIL
resolution in June.
Objective - Look into the creation of an "uptown" or "downtown" area.
DCM/DeStefano said that this is an ongoing issue in terms of trying to create
landmarks within the community. Some suggestions have been to add street
furniture, streetlights, pavement treatment, etc. There is very little
opportunity in terms of new development projects to do this type of thing.
Staff indicated that the focus should be on the two sites earlier mentioned as
an opportunity to create a sense of place — at Grand Ave. and Diamond Bar
Blvd. or the KmartNons area. The way to accomplish this is to select a
couple of locations within the City for placement of flags and other types of
defining .characteristics.
M/Herrera stated that the Grand Ave. and Diamond Bar Blvd. area offered
the greatest opportunity because it was probably the most frequently visited
area. DCM/DeStefano said that other cities have done it by working with
development of new areas. Unfortunately, it is difficult for Diamond Bar
because of the land and lack of resources. However, it is not impossible, it
will just take longer to figure out how to get it done.
CM/Lowry asked Council if it saw this as a way of securing the value of its
community by encouraging areas to go this route with similar foliage or
similar signage, etc. The Council would have to determine this as a way for
Diamond Bar to keep its value over the next 20 years so that when a site
goes up for sale or rehabilitation, there would be some kind of overlay zone
or district concept in place. That is a long-term planning idea. "Uptown—
Downtown" -- what does that mean to Council. She speculated as to the
vision, aesthetically and physically, that should be set for the future.
MPT/Huff commented that even though it would look nicer and people might
feel better about it, he did not agree that "spilling up" Grand Ave. and
Diamond Bar Blvd. would make a difference. He cited various locations
where ambiance could be created, the golf course or possibly in the Tres
Hermanos area.
C/O'Connor noticed that some stores have small outside seating areas.
Some of the businesses in The Country Hills Towne Center have attempted
to do that so they are destination points. She felt the best place to try it
would be at The Country Hills Towne Center so that there could be an effort
toward upgrading the center and making it a place people wanted to shop.
C/Zirbes agreed that presently there is no continuity in the City. He agreed
with DCM/DeStefano that the obvious sites for such opportunity would be
Site D or the hospital property, as well as the Country Hills Towne Center
building perhaps an "underground structure". He didn't see a need for
labeling "uptown -downtown" because other centers provide the same basic
level of service.
MAY 13, 2003 PAGE -13 I CITY COUNCIL
C/Chang said that he was not so concerned about t e concept of
"uptown/downtown." Diamond Bar needs a dynamic, quality s iopping center
that offers good theater, quality restaurants, and family ente lainment. He
indicated that the best location was at the corner of Grand Ave and Dia nond
Bar Blvd.
M/Herrera commented that "Uptown/Downtown" was just aoncept. The
City is looking for some place with ambiance. She comment d that th golf
course was an ideal spot, that it had a lot of potential.
C/O'Connor offered that the Objective could be
"Uptown/Downtown" to create a "destination area." Council
Objective - Work with County for possible acquisition of the
Diamon
Bar
Golf Course.
DCM/DeStefano said that the objective is to work with the C
ounty toward
acquiring the golf course for some other purpose. There are
a numb
r of
opportunities for this one -mile -of -freeway -frontage at Grand A
e., aboul
170
acres. The key is finding a suitable replacement site for theCounty
golf
course, most likely within the same Supervisorial District. Tie
City is
not
actively marketing the area, rather, looking at it as a future pr
ject.
Objective - Evaluate Site "D".
DCM/DeStefano said that this item should be rolled i
Development on Page 2.
Goal: Establish An All -Encompassing Beautification Plan
Objective - Improve slope maintenance by implementing c mprehen ive
plans for both slope beautification/maintenance and medians.
CSD/Rose stated that a draft ordinance is currently being presented to the
Planning Commission in an attempt to define the rating stand rds of slopes
presented to the Council about a year ago. Additionally, th re are o her
items in various stages of completion.
- Plans and specs for Brea Canyon Cutoff (should beomplete� by
fall 2003).
Entry statement at Temple Ave. and Diamond Bar Blv
CSD/Rose stated that basic survey work had been complete
The next step is to approach the property owners and make w
they concur with the project. The entry project is pro sed for
southeast corner. The north side of Temple Ave. wa landscal
through District 38 funding,
MAY 13, 2003 PAGE 14 CITY COUNCIL
In response to C/O'Connor, CSD/Rose confirmed that the area
belongs to the property owners. If the project proceeds and the
property owners concur, the City would assume maintenance of the
area through an easement, budgeted through District 38. Although
the survey included two properties, the City may want to incorporate
only one property.
Grand Ave. median project (across from the Honda dealership).
The City of Industry agreed to allow Diamond Bar to do the
project. Most of the project can be accomplished using District 38
funds but there's a small section in Industry and that has to be
General Fund monies. Once the State Budget is approved, staff
will have a better perspective as to the project's completion.
In response to C/O'Connor, CSD/Rose confirmed that the City of
Industry is not interested in participating in funding this project.
- Diamond Bar Blvd. between Maple Hill and Mountain Laurel (District
38), a project to remove the asphalt and landscape the area. Plans
and specs are just about ready.
- Pathfinder at Evergreen Springs (similar to the aforementioned
project) — The residents have indicated that they would like the canary
island pine trees and the oleanders removed and replaced with
landscaping similar to that in the area of Golden Springs and Ballena.
CSD/Rose said he would like to complete the project before school
starts.
- Brea Canyon Rd. at Gemdal — a small parkway between the
sidewalk and the street to dress up the entry to the residential
neighborhood.
- Golden Springs at Adel — a small parkway between the sidewalk and
the street to dress up the entry to the residential neighborhood.
The above projects are ongoing.
CM/Lowry suggested that the Council might consider bringing forward
another set of beautification projects for next year.
Obiective - Develop repair program (research funding programstopportunities
to assist low to moderate income families with improvements).
CM/Lowry reported that the Neighborhood Improvement Subcommittee has
done its job. The home improvement program funded through the CDBG
allocation is in place and an amount is being planned for the next year's
allocation of CDBG funds. There are five projects currently being worked on
with another 11 on the waiting list.
MAY 13, 2003 PAGE 15 CI1Y COUNCIL
In keeping with the repair program, DCM/DeStefano has been workin I with
DBIA to try and find use of the set-aside funding for the Paint The To that
will meet the requirements and avoid the lead-based paint issue.
M/Herrera expressed concern in not keeping the item in the goals, and
objectives, it may be overlooked in the future. C/Zirbes said t at the pr gram
has actually been completed so the item could be deleted.
M/Herrera indicated. that her concern included monitoring also. C
suggested the goal be to Monitor the Program — Council con ourred.
Obiective - Adopt slopes on major roads and/or possibly provide
assistance; staff to prepare list of options.
CSD/Rose stated that the first project is the slope on Temple
Ave. tha
was
previously discussed. He referred Council to the OTHER NOTES
secti
n --to
conduct a feasibility study to determine the funding mechani
m to fun
I the
adoption of private property slopes. District 38 is getting tote
point t
lat it
will probably not be able to expand beyond what is cont
mplated
the
question would then be whether to increase the assessment
or
drop
additional projects.
CSD/Rose confirmed to C/O'Connor that an increase in thi
1 assess
ent
would have to be approved by a vote of the people. Staff wou
d recomr
iend
that if the Council wanted to pursue funding for addition
il projec
s, a
feasibility study should take place to determine the City's
capabilit
es.
CM/Lowry suggested this be placed on a long-term list and in
Jude it u
der
a number of categories. Management would seek Council's,
advice
on a
policy decision — are we going to stop improving or are we gc
ing to as
for
voter -approved funding.
C/O'Connor said a third option would be to ask the homeowners to start
maintaining their properties. MPT/Huff suggested that if a citiz an decided to
pay for slope maintenance, the City could provide a sign indi acing "S ope
Maintained by Joe Citizen," similar to what CalTrans does.
Obiectiv-e: Clean up freeway entrances and improve slopes into City
with CalTrans).
PWD/Liu reported that CalTrans maintains a minimum level of service w thin
their right-of-way. With additional anticipated budget sh rtfalls, staff
continues to voice dissatisfaction but does not expect improvement. If a
funding source can be identified, Diamond Bar would need ai agreement
with the State.
C/O'Connor asked PWD/Liu to add to the list of complaints t CalTran to
cleanup under the SR60 overpass at Golden Springs by Pe rson P rk.
MPT/Huff stated that the freeway areas should be cleaned up nce or ice
MAY 13, 2003 PAGE 16 CITY COUNCIL
a week instead of once or twice. a month. CM/Lowry pointed out that this is
an ongoing monitoring issue that should remain on the list. As opportunities
arise, they need to be added to the list.
C/O'Connor asked if the cleanup and beautification effort could include the
freeway side of Golden Springs west of the Golf Course to Brea' Canyon,
suggesting trees be included. PWD/Liu responded "absolutely." At the end
of the four-year HOV project, if there is any left over money, additional
landscaping with irrigation could be installed in those areas, as well as
replacement of the chain link fence with the vinyl coated product, similar to
that around the golf course.
C/Chang pointed out that the northbound SR 57 slopes are over grown with
weeds and should be maintained.
Regarding the "Other Notes Section" - Conduct a feasibility study to
determine funding mechanism to fund clean-up, improvement and
maintenance of freeway entrances and adjacent slopes. It was determined
that this would be a lower priority item.
Objective. Enforce City codes and ordinances Citywide in an equitable
manner and on weekends.
Continue discussion of this item until DCM/DeStefano is present.
Obiective: Initiate educational program and/or ordinance for gardeners
related to blowing of debris into streets.
C/Zirbes said that one of the most controversial issues for the City in this past
year was street sweeping. Diamond Bar is attempting to keep the streets
clean and avoiding debris from flowing into the storm drains. There was brief
discussion on the use of blowers by gardeners and clean-up responsibilities.
C/Zirbes indicated that many cities have ordinances requiring gardeners to
have permits to do business in the city.
C/O'Connor suggested an article in The City News would assist in educating
the community. MPT/Huff concurred.
Objective. Develop a comprehensive ordinance to require shopping centers
to enforce and remove temporary signs (i.e. political signs) from shopping
centers (identify groups or individuals who will work with private property
owners to remove unauthorized signs on private property if City cannot;
require letters of approval from shopping centers to be on file at City Hall; if
no letter on file, staff or shopping center has to remove within 48 hours);
possibly establish permit system for sign companies.
Continued until DCM/DeStefano is present.
MAY 13, 2003
PAGE 17
COUNCIL
Objective - Continue to plant more trees around the City.
nsibilitie
and
CSD/Rose reported that staff is developing a sidewalk
streel
tree
maintenance program document. The intent is to bring the
document
to
Council for feedback as to when to remove trees, etc.
a vari
ty.of
M/Herrera inquired as to replacement of the sidewalk in the vicinity
of
huck-
e-Cheese at Brea Canyon Rd. and Pathfinder as the ficus trsarecalusing
seeing
what
damage. CSD/Rose said it was an ongoing issue and a ma
Ter of timl
until
the tree roots again caused the pavement to elevate.
trees
ould
M/Herrera said it is nice to enter a city that has nice large of J growth trees
but is it feasible to maintain the trees at such a cost. CSD/Rose said Mat is
the issue — what does Council want the City to look like in 2 years. If the
City continues to remove a tree to redo a sidewalk, in a few yearc, the
canopy would be removed.
CSD/Rose briefly explained the homeowners' and city's resp
nsibilitie
and
liability issues with the trimming and removal of trees, as well
s replac
ent
of sidewalk. C/O'Con nor commented on the unsightliness of a
phalt pa
hes
for sidewalks. CSD/Rose reported that rubber sidewalks comein
a vari
ty.of
colors and patterns including a brick pattern that residents seemed
to
Ike.
M/Herrera said she would be interested in revising the policy arid
seeing
what
the. City could do to preserve its trees. C/O'Connor agreed
Remo
al of
trees can devastate an area. M/Herrera did not realize removig
trees
ould
make such a big change.
r I
in
MPT/Huff encouraged staff to save the trees if at all possible. M/Herrera
asked staff to frame a policy and provide the Council with suggestions.
C/Chang asked staff to include proposed types of trees and possible root
barriers.
Obiective: Enact a comprehensive investigation into the
(i.e. conditions of sewers, etc.).
CM/Lowry explained that there are varying opinions on whetl
ier or no
the
infrastructure reporting requirements of GASB34 affects a City'c.
credit re
ling.,
In her opinion, this is something that should be done because
one o
the
City's assets is its financial position and another asset is that
it has a
rd -
winning financial statements. Thus, the Council can be certain
is accou
ting
is accurate. The part that is to her even more interesting is the
discussion
about sewers.
C/O'Connor
said that this morning's s paper had an article that
disco
ed
Glendora raising their water rates 50% to 300% over the next
few yeas
in
order to meet the infrastructure needs for their water lines.
MAY 13, 2003 PAGE 18 CITY COUNCIL
CM/Lowry said that although the sewers were never given to Diamond Bar
when it incorporated, the County says they will become Diamond Bar's
sewers in terms of ownership. Even though the County has been taking the
money to maintain the sewers, when it is time to replace the sewers, it will be
Diamond Bar's .problem. Council should keep this in mind in terms of
planning for the future.
PWD/Liu said that last year, residents were notified about an increase in
sewer service charge. In the notice to the residents, the County indicated
two separate fees — money for ongoing operations and money for rehab.
With the upcoming EPA mandate, it falls to cities to rehab their own
infrastructure.. Staff will continue to monitor the situation.
CM/Lowry pointed out that the Pavement Management System will be an
ongoing "business as usual" item. The third piece of the investigation of the
infrastructure would be the GIS Implementation. PWD/Liu stated that,
additionally, the State Water Board has mandated that cities have to
participate in the production of a statewide GIS inventory system. Staff is
looking into a system that will meet State and County requirements.
Objective: Develop sidewalk/curb replacement fund.
C/O'Connor questioned if this item includes fixing the closed Grand Ave.
sidewalk by the golf course. DCM/DeStefano indicated that the City would
be taking care of that. PWD/Liu explained that the problem is the CalTrans
signal -controller and the sidewalk has to be dome at the same time. Staff will
coordinate that.
CM/Lowry said that staff's position is that it has ongoing use of either Gas
Tax or CDBG monies. Typically, these funds have been used every year to
do sidewalks; what is the necessity of a replacement fund.
MPT/Huff said his thought about this item was that when trees cause
sidewalks to buckle, these monies could be used to mitigate the state of
disrepair. That is different from upgrade projects. This was intended to be
a totally -separate item for repair matters only. C/O'Connor agreed.
Brief discussion continued as to necessities for dedicated monies, and tree
and sidewalk replacement fees.
FD/Magnuson said that line -item budget appropriations fall back into the
General Fund at the end of the year and the monies are re -budgeted on an
annual basis. This offsets any proliferation of specialized areas. She --�
recommended an all-encompassing infrastructure fund, or add a line -item for
sidewalk maintenance.
Council agreed to add a line -item for sidewalks. Further, it was determined
to preserve trees that are damaging sidewalks and that DCM/DeStefano
1
MAY 13, 2003 PAGE 19 C17Y COUNCIL
would bring back a policy.
Objective - Develop entry signs that display the different servi a clubs ithin
the City.
C/O'Connor said she has received requests from many service organiz tions
for City entry signs that promote their businesses. She would like to sE e the
City develop some type of display. Council voiced concern about how any
signs would be needed at one entrance.
MPT/Huff suggested this be in the "when we have mi
C/O'Connor said the service organizations would pay for it.
DCM/Doyle suggested listing the service organizations on a
on the bulletin board at Diamond Bar Honda.
M/Herrera said she would like to see at least one sign.
Objective - Build a permanent stage at Sycamore Canyon F
C/Chang commented that a permanent stage be constructs
Canyon Park due to the Concerts in the Park event ei
CSD/Rose reported that a permanent stage would alter the
usefulness of the park and that the portable stage is put
beginning of the summer and taken down at the end of the
Council concurred to remove this item.
at
colu
su
Ibiancel and
once a the
Objective - Enforce City codes and ordinances citywide in an eq
manner and on weekends.
DCM/DeStefano said that some of the objective had been accomplished (the
brochures and the re -direction of the code enforcement efforts, hiring a City
Prosecutor). Staff is experiencing more property maintenance issu s.
"Combo" inspectors are anticipated to broaden code enforcement Work
beyond zoning.
C/O'Connor expressed dismay at the number of sandwic -boards and
temporary signs that crop up around the City on the weekenc s.
DCM/DeStefano said that with the use of the City prosecutor, staff is c ose
to taking cases to court, citing three or four businesses that refuse to co ply
with fundamental property maintenance issues. In the event of econornic
hardship or physical handicap, service clubs are enlisted to assist in Ithe
event residents.
C/O'Connor cited violations that the Community Services Office (CSO) o
concentrate on when not occupied, and suggested that an awaren
campaign can be conducted. Discussion ensued to give warning tickets,
MAY 13, 2003 PAGE 20 CITY COUNCIL
amount of. the fine, the weekend enforcement, staggered hours, overtime
pay, as well as the array of signage in the medians on the weekend.
DCM/DeStefano said the City could go back to doing all of those things.
Objective_- Develop a comprehensive ordinance to require shopping centers
to enforce and remove temporary signs, etc.
DCMIDeStefano explained that the Planning Commission is looking at a draft
proposal this evening for potential changes to about eight different areas of
the City's Code. The Commission may continue the matter to. a later
meeting, bringing the matter to the City Council sometime late June or early
July.
Goal - Improve Communications with citizens and ex and or enhance
customer service.
Objective - Improve communication/public relations with residents.
C/O'Connor said that these items have become a part of staff's ongoing
occurrence.
Council concurred that these matters were included in PIM/Blakey's ongoing
job description.
Objective - Establish departmental procedures for returning calls within 24
hours; staff to draft letters for Council in response to community letters
(letters responded to within 72 hours); conduct customer service training for
staff.
DCM/Doyle reported that staff is in the process of implementing the approved
CRM program, tracking correspondence and attaining a 72 -hour turnaround
time. All letters to the City could be input into a tracking system and the
information regarding numbers and response time would be available for
Council to consider.
Staff requested clarification as to Council's intent relating to correspondence
responses; i.e. draft for Council or City Manager signature. It was suggested
that an acknowledgement letter be sent indicating the staff member assigned
the responsibility. Further, Council would receive copies of all responses,
with a copy of the initial request/concern attached.
Objective - Utilize DBTV for public service announcements and videos; define
usage of DBTV by community organizations; utilize channel to enhance
communications with residents; monitor audio/sound issue related to live City
Council broadcasts. -
PIM/Blakey said that since the City has taken over the programming for
DBTV, her ongoing goals include monitoring the sound and looking into more
1
MAY 13, 2003
PAGE 21
CI11Y COUNCIL
ways to add and upgrade programming.
Objective - Involve residents in establishing goals/objective (possibly with
survey/flyer).
Council agreed to remove this item.
Obiective - Expand e -government capabilities.
DCM/Doyle reported that the program is currently being fine tuned an J will
be operational in about a month.
Objective - Establish a 24 hour kiosk in lobby to conduct City services
PIM/Blakey reported this would be available to the public in the very near
future,
Objective - Keep website current in content and technology
PIM/Blakey reported this is an on-going process
Objective - Inform residents of needed permits.
DCM/DeStefano reported that this program would include articl s in theCity's
News, as well as informational brochures available upon request, and can be
viewed on the City's website.
Obiective - Establish programs with local school districts.
DCS/Rose commented that this, as well as the mentorship pr gram, w uld
be incorporated in the Youth Master Plan.
Objective - Establish "Mayor/Council Member for a day" progr am.
Objective - Establish internship program.
CM/Lowry commented that the City has this type of program i i place.
Objective - Establish mentorship program
This is combined with the local school districts programs.
"laborato " for the local schools, colleges and universities.
MAY 13, 2003 PAGE 22 CITY COUNCIL
Objective - Compile list of properties desired for parks/open space; develop
plan and financial method for possible acquisition.
Objective - Implement Trails Master Plan (includes developing a landscape
area overlooking Sycamore Canyon Park).
CSD/Rose commented that staff is currently seeking a grant that would
incorporate this plan.
Objective - Consider development of a sports complex (work with property
owners school districts, surrounding cities and counties to purchase property
and/or enter into joint use agreement to develop complex which includes a
gymnasium, swimming pool and sports fields).
Previously discussed.
Obiective - Build basketball courts, gazebos and benches in each park, as
well as initiate flower planting projects.
CSD/Rose reported that there is a neighborhood meeting at Starshine Park
this evening. One of the topics is the ADA retrofit of the park, as well as
acquiring the residents' input regarding installation of a double half -court with
the baskets in the middle.
Regarding gazebos, two shelters are being constructed at Pantera Park and
two at Sycamore Canyon Park; all should be completed by fall 2003.
MPT/Huff asked about the Tamaya memorial. CSD/Rose indicated that that
is being considered as part of the overlook at Sycamore. C/O'Connor stated
that Mrs. Tamaya indicated that she would be in favor of installation of a
bench and trees in the trail in Sycamore with the remaining funds to go
toward purchase of a Community Foundation tile.
CSD/Rose explained that there are places that are like platforms overlooking
the canyon from the trailhead with two benches. Two donations are to be
made: one is in memory of Hal Sturim and the other is in memory of Steve
Tamaya. Staff hopes to have this completed by July 3`d.
Obiective - Establish youth advisory committee.
CM/Lowry asked if this item could be removed from the goals and objectives
list and be included in the Youth Master Plan.
Council concurred.
Objective - Establish and design memorial area for veterans — included in
Community/Senior Center construction — remove from list.
MAY 13, 2003 PAGE 23 CITY COUNCIL
Regarding the memorial area for Veterans, DCM/Doyle st<
flagpoles with a bronze plaque has been envisioned for that
Council agreed that this item can be removed.
and Transportation Issues which im act Cily residents.
Obiective - Computerized Signal Management System ruby
County (Interconnect Master Plan).
PWD/Liu stated that the City is about 80% connected to the I
the County. There is an opportunity to work with the COL
Management System which has been in progress for the last
The conceptual design will be completed by the end of th
actual design estimated to be completed by 2004 and imp
begin. The City has informed the County that it wants ultim
and we have been assured that that can happen.
In response to MPT/Huff, PWD/Liu indicated that the funding
this project. Once the system is built, operation and mainten,
have to be absorbed by the cities.
MPT/Huff asked what the decision-making process would be
of the regional center. PWD/Liu stated that the County's con.,
is to negotiate a site. There are still some remaining issu
location of the center. This matter will continue to be ongoir
Objective - Pursue/monitor traffic solutions (Four Corners PI
Obiective - Support ACE funding requests and construction
grade crossing projects.
CSD/Rose explained that the comment has to do with
irrigation improvement plans.
PWD/Liu reported that the grade separation design, has been
least one year. With both design and funding issues now, the
delayed for at least two more years.
MPT/Huff said that funding may be available from the High%
lane project. MTA staff suggested they can come up with
replace what the Governor removed from the Congestion Man
Fund. And if they don't, there is an alternate plan to pull the m
car pool lane (the COG's idea) that was scheduled with tl
project.
CM/Lowry indicated that this activity will remain on the Goals
that
ionas
uple of y
year wit
nentatioi
local cc
still inta
ce costs
r the loci
Cant's pr
concer
for a wh
— ongc
nearby
not
with
final
jars.
the
will
itrol
tfor
ing
alayed f r at
oject wil be
10 carp ool
a money to
,ment Relief
:y out of the
10 free ay
for a wHile.
MAY 13, 2003 PAGE 24 CITY COUNCIL
Ob ective -Study feasibility of hiring a consultant to study in -town shuttle
service feeding park & rides, Metrolink and commercial areas — Consider
"Get -About" minibus system for short trips within the City.
MPT/Huff reported that Calabasas implemented a very successful City -
sponsored shuttle system to pick up students after school and transport them
to the library. He recommends that a similar program would be useful in
Diamond Bar. C/O'Connor said that Foundation members suggested
applying for a grant to administer this type of program.
Council consensus was to keep this on the long-term list of Goals_
Objective - Monitor State Route 60 truck lane project ongoing, part of the
Don Camph Project.
Objective - Effectively and aggressively pursue resolution of citywide
speeding problems.
PWD/Liu reported that staff interviewed consultants and a recommendation
could be ready for Council consideration in the near future. The concept is
to partner with the residents to become part of the stakeholder process and
identify some of the priorities. The Sheriffs Department and City staff have
been dealing with neighborhood issues in a reactive manner.
In response to MPT/Huff, PWD/Liu indicated that the speed hump moratorium
will expire this coming August. M/Herrera stated that there should be a Study
Session in July to discuss the situation.
Objective - Develop an in-house traffic signal synchronization system.
PWD/Liu reported that the City's consultant has recently completed the
project, short of implementing it. It is now on hold because of CalTrans'
Traffic Management Plan scheduled to be in effect over the next few years.
Resources have been allocated for this fiscal year.
C/Zirbes asked if the synchronization program would be somewhat flexible
and fluid. PWD/Liu responded "absolutely." There is going to be on-going
speeding enforcement, but with the surge of traffic, it is not known exactly
how the CalTrans construction project will impact City streets.
C/Zirbes stated that once detour routes are known, staff could program the
signals to work with the new detour route that CalTrans is establishing. The
SR57/60 HOV project presents an opportunity to test the system to change
the dynamics as needed.
Objective - Provide bike lanes along Grand Ave. and Brea Canyon_ Rd. in
order to connect to surrounding cities.
MAY 13, 2003 PAGE 25 CRY COUNCIL.
PWD/Liu reported that Grand Ave. was too heavily traveled tc accommodate
a Class it or III bike lane. The street is considered a Class IIOUke lane t this
time. In order to accommodate five traffic lanes, Grand Ave.Id los part
of its median or infringe on the residential and business aspe of the trees.
CSD/Rose pointed out that bike lane improvements were a part of the rails
Master Plan. Council concurred to strike this item and conside it a part f the
Trails Master Plan.
use in Tres Hermanos. — ongoing
All items on Page 13 are to remain in the ongoing status.
safgV and maintain propeny values — ongoing
com feted — delete from list v
C/Zirbes said that he and C/Chang discussed crafting an ordinance rega ing
trashcans. Perhaps first-time warnings could be given out and a fine o $10
or whatever amount could be established for repeat offender .
CM/Lowry asked Council if they would like this matter agen ized for fluly,
Council concurred.
code issues — on oin .
Strategic Planning Workshop
CM/Lowry said that a percentage of a plan is in place. She outlined s
aspects of the City's General Plan and its interpretation meeting toc
standards, desires, and future expectations by the community and the
Council.
Some cities create 10 -year plans that are updated every year or every
years. For their budget they create a work plan out of the master plan
goes by department and indicates completion dates. The smallest emph
is placed on the budget. After the city has decided on thework plan, i
decide how they will fund it. Also, the plans and ideas need t be in pl
first, then presented to the public for evaluation.
MAY 13, 2003 PAGE 2S CITY COUNCIL
DCM/DeStefano said that although the City's General Plan is almost 10 years
old, that probably 90-95 percent remains to be done. He suggested that
introspection would allow the Council to be amazed at how much has been
done and how much is being done that ties back into the General Plan. He
did not believe it was necessary for the City to spend a lot of time changing
the General Plan.
CM/Lowry commented that she viewed the General Plan as the guiding
document. Explaining to the public that an item is on the goals and objectives
list because it is in the General Plan is much more meaningful and
empowering.
DCM/DeStefano explained that everything the City does ties into the vision
that helped create the General Plan.
CM/Lowry said that having a recent buy -in from the constituents like Diamond
Bar has on the General Plan is a good thing, a real asset. She recommended
that Council and staff do everything possible to maintain that connection.
CM/Lowry concurred with MPT/Huff that the City has seen a big change in
demographics. Concepts about the city's character may also vary as well.
CM/Lowry explained that the second goals and objectives document was
resorted to coincide with the General Plan's Vision Statement — a strategic
planning format document. If the Council is comfortable with the new format,
it could focus on the new format at its next meeting.
CM/Lowry said that Business Registration is coming back later. Industry East
is never going to go away.
Chamber of Commerce Contract -- ongoing — eliminate.
Senior Housing Program/first time -buyer 12rograrn — eliminate.
Hire a local grant writer who can assist City and various organizations
DCM/Doyle said this consists of two items: the City grant writer that has been
budgeted in this and the past budget year. The grant writers have worked on
a number of grants, have been successful on some and not on others. Staff
is recommending that this item be removed so that the grant writer could be
considered as an item for the City's annual budget.
The second item involved the Diamond Bar Community Foundation grant
writer. Last year Council awarded $15,000 for the Foundation's grant writer
services. Staff has not included this item in next year's budget and would like
direction from the Council on this matter. If the Council chose to consider
providing this service, it could be included in the annual budget.
MAY 13, 2003 PAGE 27 CITIY COUNCIL
C/O'Connor said she would like to see this item included in the City's budget.
M/Herrera commented that (having a grant writer) was important to the
success of the Foundation.
C/O'Connor said that after a year, the Council could determine whether the
Foundation could support itself. She reiterated that the Foundation wallts to
meet with the Council to get answers to several questions, i.e., City
involvement. Currently, the City's Finance Director andity Clerk are
members of the Foundation, treasurer and secretary, respec iveiv.
M/Herrera confirmed that the item should be stricken from the. list, it
in the budget and remain as a goat.
Review Fee Schedules completed except for Review fees for Community
and user fees for the new Community/Senior Center.
PUBLIC COMMENTS: None Offered.
2.3 FISCAL YEAR 2003-04 BUDGET — Continued to May 20 2003
Session.
2.4 BUDGET DECISION PACKAGES — Continued to May 20, 2003
Session.
CM/Lowry requested direction from Council. M/Herrera said she would like
to see the decision package. C/O'Connor asked staff to provide costs for
community service events. CSD/Rose responded that at the end of each
event staff prepared a summary of costs.
ADJOURNMENT. There being no further business to
M/Herrera adjourned the meeting at 9:10 p.m. to the May 20, 2003, s udj
Linda C. Lowry, i�ty Clerk
The foregoing Minutes are hereby approved this 1S' day of July 2003.
ATTEST:
Carol Herrera, Mayor