Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/02/1996 Minutes - Regular MeetingMINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL JULY 2, 1996 WORK SESSION 1. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Ansari called the Work Session to order at 5:45 p.m. in the SCAQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California. 1.1 DISCUSSION REGARDING PROPOSAL BY FRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY - CM/Belanger explained that the Friends of the Library proposed that the City jointly participate in funding a portion of the Diamond Bar Library branch facility refurbishment. Staff requested that the L.A. County Library provide a wish list to the City indicating items the County believes are essential to the refurbishment. In the current fiscal year, the City's Library Services fund consists of $88,000 in unallocated funds. He recommended that Council consider an allocation of $20,000 from the current Library Services fund to engage in a refurbishing project to be determined through discussion with the Friends of the Library, D.B. Library staff and City staff to determine project parameters to meet immediate interior needs for the Library. M/Ansari stated that Mrs. New, Friends of the Library President, indicated that Michael MacClintock, L.A. County Library, told her it was not necessary for the Friends of the Library to assist with refurbishment of the D.B. facility. In her opinion, the items and prices contained in the "wish list" are outrageous. C/Herrera favored City participation in the refurbishment of the facility; however, she would like to have the City evaluate the condition of the building to determine the state of deterioration to determine if another location would be advisable. C/Werner agreed with C/Herrera. He asked why L.A. County is not maintaining its own building and if the proposed improvements are a result of lack of normal maintenance. CM/Belanger responded that there may be some deferred maintenance due to reduction of funds for counties. C/Werner was opposed to using City funds for maintaining county -facilities which may include the D.B. Golf Course. M/Ansari had no problem assisting private citizens with funding for projects such as the library computer project; however, she had difficulty. with the of list" when the City is asked to provide funds to cover deferred maintenance. She proposed sending a letter to the County Library asking why the D.B. facility had not been maintained, and further requesting an accounting of D. B. allocated property tax assessment maintenance funds for Library Services. She suggested putting the Friends of the Library request on hold pending further information. MPT/Huff approved of City funding for Library refurbishing; however, L.A. JULY 2, 1996 PAGE 2 County has an obligation to maintain its facilities. He agreed that the City should pursue investigation of the prior use of D. B. property fax funds by the County with respect to facility maintenance but he did not want to unnecessarily delay the rofurbishment process. C/Harmony supported M/Ansari's suggestion to request information regarding prior use of D.B. property tax funds. He believed the City should be involved in the refurbishment bid process and oversee the work through completion and favored proceeding to assist the Friends of the Library in a timely manner. CM/Belanger explained that under current legislation, in the event the City agreed to assume maintenance of the D.B. Library, the facility would be transferred to the City without additional cost. C/Wemer suggested that if the City were to participate in funding any portion of capital improvement to the D.B. Library facility, the City should enter into an agreement that the amount contributed by the City toward the capital improvement would be deducted from the purchase price. CM/Belanger stated that in the event the City builds a Library and sells the Library to the County, the City would require the County to continue operation with services at a certain minimum level. If the County ceased providing a minimum level of service, the building would revert back to the City. 1.2 DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED STAFF SALARY INCREASE - CM/Belanger explained the total cost for the 3 1/2°x6 proposed cost of living increase for City employees plus $50/month in cafeteria benefit increase would be $67,645. He further explained that compounded cost of living increase percentages since City incorporation amount to 16.4%. Cost of living increases in the survey cities indicate a 24.8°x6 increase. Therefore, an eight percent (8°x6) disparity currently exists for the City of D.B.. The CPI change has been 1.7% for each of the past two fiscal years in Los Angeles/Long Beach SMSA. C/Harmony stated he was told by Al Rumpilla that persons on disability received a 2 1/2°x6 cost of living adjustment and now contribute a $40 or $50 deductible toward medical costs. CM/Belanger responded to C/Harmony that the Federal and State -- Government entitlement process is based upon regional or national figures and differs from City entitlements which are based on local areas. D.B. compares only in the greater Los Angeles area in which staffs cost of living occurs. JULY 2, 1996 PAGE 3 MPT/Huff favored the City adequately compensating staff by maintaining a competitive stature. He suggested that use of the CPI may be misleading. He would prefer to have the City first discuss reorganization and reclassification of employees and services and base salary increases on performance-based merit rather than cost of living adjustments. He suggested a 1.7% cost of living increase and budget $25,000 for incentive disbursements at the discretion of the City Manager. M/Ansari disagreed with MPT/Huff in that staff consistently works overtime and are present at weekend and evening meetings and special events. In her opinion, incentive increases should be granted employees in addition to an annual cost of living increase. C/Herrera agreed with M/Ansari that the City should give annual cost of living increases. When reorganization is complete, certain salaries may change. The reorganization and implementation process may take several months to complete. In the meantime, staff should be granted a cost of living increase immediately. ^' MPT/Huff reiterated that he was in favor of a cost of living increase which is equal to the COL. CM/Belanger explained that staff is recommending a 3.5°x6 cost of living increase to compensate for inequity in the cost of living increases during the time period the City has existed. The City has not maintained pace with the CPI over the past eight years. CM/Belanger responded to C/Herrera that staff is not aware of the cost of living increases being considered by surrounding cities. C/Herrera reiterated that by requesting a 3.5% cost of living increase, the City is playing "catch-up" with the CPI. A 1.7% cost of living increase will fail to bring the City in line with the CPI. In her opinion, this would place the City in jeopardy of retaining competent staff. MPT/Huff responded that employee compensation is important but that this is an era of fiscal restraint and caution should be exercised. C/Wemer reported that the Inland Valley Bulletin indicated that he would be voting in favor of a 3.5% cost of living increase but that he had made no -' such commitment to the reporter. Therefore, due to irresponsible reporting, he felt his objectivity had been hampered and chose to remain silent on the issue. He indicated he may request a motion to continue the item. Bob Arceo, 1106 #D S. Cleghom Dr., felt that some of the remarks regarding JULY 2, 1996 PAGE 4 the speed with which various staff members work is discriminatory and a cost of living increase should be granted all City employees. M/Ansari adjourned the workshop at 6:35 p.m. MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR JULY 2, 1996 CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Ansari called the meeting to order at 6:54 p.m. in the SCAQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Don Schad. ROLL CALL: Council Members Harmony, Herrera, Werner, Mayor Pro Tem Huff, Mayor Ansari. Also present were: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager, Frank Usher, Assistant City Manager; Michael Jenkins, City Attorney; George Wentz, Public Works Director; James DeStefano, Community Development Director; Bob Rose, Community Services Director and Lynda Burgess, City Clerk. 2. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATES, PROCLAMATIONS: 2.1 Presented Certificate of Recognition to the San Gabriel/Pomona Regional Center upon celebrating its 10th Anniversary in providing continuous service to persons with developmental disabilities. 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Dr. Lawrence Rhodes suggested changing the Council agenda to have Council Comments immediately following Public Comments. Robert Arceo referred to the June 30, 1996 Daily Bulletin newspaper article which quoted MPT/Huff as stating he wants a Senior Citizen center to be centrally located in the community. He disagreed with MPT/Huff. . MPT/Huff responded to Mr. Arceo that he did not make the statement as it was quoted. Mr. Arceo requested Council attendance at the Heritage Park Senior . Citizen's meetings. He stated that, in his opinion, the facility is too small to accommodate the group. He complained about the amount of a.m. peak hour Chino Hills traffic and the lack of enforcement in the Grand Ave./D.B. Blvd. area. Red Calkins spoke about the June 26, 1996 Three Valleys Water District meeting and asked why Council members and staff did not attend. Tom Ortiz asked Council to state their opinions regarding the proposed standby water charge. M/Ansari responded to Mr. Ortiz that Senate Bill #900 is available to the JULY 2, 1996 PAGE 2 public. Millard Burke, Harmony Hill, did not understand why so many stop signs are needed in his neighborhood. In response to Mr. Ortiz, CM/Belanger stated that the monthly Treasurer's Report recaps cash on hand. The Traffic Mitigation fund indicates a zero balance because the funds have been expended for the San Bernardino County/City agreement for the Grand Ave. opening. Funds were allocated for the Chino Hills Parkway completion, Chino Avenue completion. The San Bernardino County contribution to the City of $1.2 million had been a funding source for a variety of roadway improvement projects and traffic signalization projects since 1989. The zero balance line item will be removed at the end of the fiscal year. He further stated the $300,000 one time only Traffic Mitigation Fund contributed by Copley was expended for the Golden Springs Dr. improvements between Grand Ave. and Brea Canyon Rd. Street lights are provided by a special district administered by L.A. County. In response to Mr Ortiz' question regarding the Volunteer Patrol's vehicle mileage and fuel consumption, he stated that he will look into the matter and notify Mr. Ortiz. C/Werner stated the Volunteer Patrol vehicles utilize alternative fuel. 4. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: 4.1 CONCERT IN THE PARK - Norm Major Orchestra (Patriotic) - July 3, 1996 - 6:30 p.m. to 8:00 p.m., Sycamore Canyon Park, 22930 Golden Springs Dr. 4.2 JULY 4 HOLIDAY - City offices closed on July 4, 1996 and reopen on Friday, July 5, 1996. 4.3 PLANNING COMMISSION - July 8, 1996 - 7:00 p.m., SCAQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 4.4 CONCERT IN THE PARK - Dixie Kings (Dixieland) - July 10, 1996 - 6:30 p.m. to 8:00 p.m., Sycamore Canyon Park, 22930 Golden Springs Dr. 4.5 TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION - July 11, 1996 - 7:00 p.m., SCAQMD Board Hearing Room, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 4.6 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - July 16, 1996 - 6:30 p.m., SCAQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. 5. CONSENT CALENDAR: C/Herrera moved, C/Wemer seconded, to approve the Consent Calendar with the exception of Items 5.5, 5.7 and 5.9. With the following Roll Call vote motion carried: J U LY 2, 1996 PAGE 3 AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Harmony, Herrera, Werner, MPT/Huff, M/Ansari NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None 5.1 APPROVED VOUCHER REGISTER - dated July 2, 1996 in the amount of $507,840.66. 5.2 RECEIVED & FILED TREASURER'S REPORT - for May, 1996. 5.3 REJECTED CLAIM FOR INDEMNIFICATION, APPORTIONMENT AND DECLARATORY RELIEF - Filed June 3, 1996 by Clasina Lohr Courture and referred the matter for further action to Carl Warren & Co., the City's Risk Manager. 5.4 ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 9649: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING THE INSTALLATION OF MULTI -WAY STOP SIGNS AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF BREA CANYON ROAD/COOL SPRINGS DRIVE AND FOUNTAIN SPRINGS ROAD/SUNBRIGHT DRIVE. 5.6 APPROVED RENEWAL OF CROSSING GUARD SERVICES CONTRACT FOR SCHOOL YEAR 1996-1997 - with All City Management Services, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $66,000 (hourly rate of $9.52). 5.8 APPROVED SUPPLEMENT NO. 5 TO AGREEMENT FOR ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES - with the Humane Society of Pomona Valley in the amount of $59,510 commencing July 1, 1996 through and including June 30, 1997, and authorized the Mayor to execute the Supplement. MATTERS WITHDRAWN FROM CONSENT CALENDAR: 5.5 AMENDMENT NO.4 TO LEASE AGREEMENT DATED AUGUST 18, 1989, AMENDED FEBRUARY 18, 1994, JULY 8, 1994 AND AUGUST 1, 1995 BY AND BETWEEN DIAMOND BAR BUSINESS ASSOCIATES, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP (LESSOR), AND THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR (LESSEE) FOR SPACE LOCATED AT 21660 E. COPLEY DRIVE, SUITES 100 AND 190, DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 3,854 RENTABLE SQUARE FEET AMENDED TO 7,025 RENTABLE SQUARE FEET - C/Harmony moved, MPT/Huff seconded to approve a one year lease for Suites 100 and 190, at 21660 E. Copley Drive in the amount of $154,710 and direct staff to continue to pursue the purchase of a building for City Hall offices JULY 2, 1996 PAGE 4 when the opportunity to do so occurs. With the following Roll Call vote, motion carried: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Harmony, Herrera, Werner, MPT/Huff, WAnsari NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None 5.7 LETTER OF AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF BREA TO PROVIDE FOR RECREATION SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996-1997 - C/Herrera moved, C/Wemer seconded, to approve Letter of Agreement with City of Brea to provide for Recreation Services for Fiscal Year 1996-1997 with projected expenditures of $380,995 and projected revenues of $249,410 and authorize the Mayor to sign the letter of agreement. With the following Roll Call vote, motion carried: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Harmony, Herrera, Werner, M/Ansari NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - MPT/Huff (MPT/Huff was out of the room during this vote). 5.9 RESOLUTION NO. 96-50: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR CONDITIONALLY SUPPORTING TENTATIVE WASTE DISCHARGE ORDER NO. 96-49, RE -ISSUING MUNICIPAL NPDES PERMIT CAS614001 - CA/Jenkins read the staff report into the record. M/Ansari moved, MPT/Huff seconded to adopt Resolution No. 96-50. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Harmony, Herrera, Werner, MPT/Huff, M/Ansari NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 6.1 INTENDED SALE OF PUBLIC PROPERTY LOCATED ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF BREA CANYON ROAD - CMIBelanger stated that on June 19, 1996, Council adopted a Resolution of Intention declaring its intent to dispose of approximately 6.5 acres of public property located along the west side of Brea Canyon Rd. between Pathfinder Rd. and Via Sorella. The property includes the former Walnut Valley Water District reservoir site and the adjacent excess street right-of- JULY 2, 1996 PAGE 5 way. In accordance with the Government Code, a Public Hearing was established for hearing protests to the intended sale. He recommended that Council 1) declare the property surplus; 2) approve the, sale of public property; 3) direct the City Manager to notice public agencies and, if no offer is received within 60 days, negotiate with private parties; and 4) place the proceeds of the sale in a parks and recreational facilities development fund. C/Harmony stated that Council previously discussed the possibility of this property being used for park and recreation activities in place of Larkstone Park. He further stated his understanding that the Walnut Valley Water District' was purchased by the City for recreation purposes. M/Ansari recalled that the purpose for the purchase of this property would be determined at a future date. Larkstone Park is currently under consideration. Parcels 92 and 93 were never proposed to be a park site. In her opinion, the parcels could serve to accommodate the Senior Citizens Group. However, the roadway between the two parcels may prohibit such a use. She was not in favor of the City giving up property and if it is sold, she would like the proceeds placed in a parks and recreation fund for future property purchase. C/Wemer stated the Walnut Valley School District made a commitment to the City to provide the land for Larkstone Park. It is time for the school district to fulfill its commitment. He indicated that Parcels 92 and 93 do not serve the public purpose or needs identified by the City. Quimby funds will be forthcoming from the developer to assist in improvement of the property provided by the school district. In addition, the school facilities, by prior arrangement with the school district, will have a ball field available to the public. In response to MPT/Huff, CM/Belanger stated that the property being offered for sale is the four acre site along with the right-of-way. The Tentative Map requires those properties to be exchanged and/or sold in order to proceed with a Final Map. The Final Map would transmute the properties into Lots 92 and 93. He reiterated a park was never designated for this area but that three acres of property were dedicated for Larkstone Park nearby. Before a park could be developed, an agreement was reached between L.A. County and WVUSD to build the temporary South Pointe Middle School on the site. The dedicated Larkstone Park site was hillside land. MPT/Huff suggested the City consider, as part of the Parks Master Plan, creating Larkstone Park in the canyon bottom as a passive park area. JULY 2, 1996 PAGE 6 C/Harmony expressed concern that the monies realized from the sale of Lots 92 and 93 would purchase fewer acres. M/Ansari reiterated that WVUSD is cognizant of their obligation to provide three acres of parkland to the City. Citizens are concerned that if the property is sold, the City will not be able to purchase comparable acreage with the proceeds of the sale. M/Ansari opened the Public Hearing. Don Schad asked the City not to sell the property, and extend the natural corridor by keeping the hillside intact. He discussed the flora and fauna in Sandstone Canyon and suggested a joint venture between WVUSD, City Council, the Parks & Recreation Department and the Tonner Canyon Wilderness Conservancy to protect the area. Rial Flesher, Larkstone Dr., felt that the right thing would be for the City to sell the property to Arciero. He referred to the citizen's group and homeowners association that caused the school district to purchase the property and cost taxpayers unnecessary dollars. He indicated he would like to see the school district get out of the building business, complete the school project, allow Arciero to develop his land, build the road from Brea Canyon Rd. to South Pointe Middle School and end the Larkstone Dr. debacle. Annette Finnerty, Silver Hawk, Vice Chairman of the Parks & Recreation Commission. She indicated that the Commission requested she speak to Council regarding the Commission's June 27 meeting during which Commissioners were presented with a newspaper article regarding the sale of the property. By a unanimous vote, the item was placed on the Commission agenda for discussion. Following discussion, the Commission voted 5-0 to recommend to Council that the land be swapped and not sold. In her opinion, only half of the information needed to reach an informed decision was provided to the Commission. If she was voting today, she would vote to recommend the City sell the property and place the funds in a Parks & Recreation Facilities Development Fund. In response to C/Wemer, Ms. Finnerty explained that the vote by the Parks & Recreations Commission was to recommend the property be swapped. She indicated. that Chairman Tye presented photocopies of a June 27, 1996 Daily Bulletin article to, the Commission which referred to the pending sale of the property. There was no additional public input to the Commission regarding the item. She felt that if she had been provided adequate information to reach a conclusion regarding the matter, she would have voted to recommend that the City sell the property. JULY 2, 1996 PAGE 7 Anne Flesher, 20647 Larkstone Dr., supported the sale of the property to Mr. Arciero and indicated that, in her opinion, passage of the City's General Plan should have sent the message that the silent majority is comfortable with the City's direction. She felt strongly that the City should allow Mr. Arciero to develop his property. Neighborhood residents are not requesting an active park in the area but would like to have a second access road to the school property. Art Fritz, Larkstone Dr., reiterated that the neighborhood suffers from the South Point Middle School traffic and the residents would welcome a second access road to accommodate the facility. To indicate the property proposed for sale by the City is suitable for a park is, in his opinion, to misstate the potential uses for the property. If the City can realize a healthy profit from the sale of this property, it should proceed with the sale and earmark the proceeds for parks and recreational facilities development. Oscar Law asked the City to persuade Mr. Arciero to consider preserving the "Columbus" tree and the "Lewis and Clark" wildflower located on the property. M/Ansari indicated to Mr. Law that Mr. Arciero agreed to attempt to preserve the "Columbus" tree. C/Werner suggested that Mr. Law consider that the 500 year old "Columbus" oak tree may be too old to preserve based upon Mr. Schad's statement that it takes 400 years for an oak tree to mature and 100 years for an oak tree to die. He suggested that Mr. Arciero consider donating the tree remains in bulk for preservation if the Columbus" tree cannot be spared. Further, he suggested that Mr. Arciero consider permitting mr. Schad to replant the wildflower bulb in question. Mr. Law stated that if he had been presented with all of the facts regarding the pending property sale at the June 27 Parks & Recreation Commission meeting, he would not have voted in favor of a land swap for the property. Dr. Lawrence Rhodes suggested that if the property is sold, the proceeds of the sale should be placed in trust and held for park purchase only. Debby O'Connor stated that as a Parks & Recreation Commissioner, for the record, if the Commission had been provided full disclosure, she would have voted to recommend selling the property. Steve Tye, Chairman of the Parks & Recreation Commission, stated JULY 2, 1996 PAGE 8 that contrary to C/Werner's statement, he was not instructed by C/Harmony to place the sale of property item on the Parks & Recreation Commission agenda. He indicated it does not serve the City to hold useless parcels and the property in question should be sold with the proceeds dedicated to the purchase of parks and park facilities. He further stated that he alone requested the pending sale of property item be placed on the June 27 Parks & Recreation Commission agenda. There being no further testimony offered, M/Ansari closed the Public Hearing. In response to C/Harmony, CA/Jenkins stated that there are no penalties for release of information from closed sessions. It is advisable to retain confidentiality of confidential information to avoid potential compromise to released information. C/Harmony suggested that the sale proceeds from Lots 92 and 93 be retained for use in Area A. M/Ansari stated that L.A. County placed map and deed restrictions on certain properties which prevented the development of parks. She reiterated that the sale proceeds should be placed in a parks and recreational facility fund. She further stated she was concerned that the City will not be able to purchase comparable*property using the proceeds gained from the sale of this property. CM/Belanger stated the City still owns undeveloped park land. The City is likely to receive, through the entitlement process, open space and park lands. He referred Council to Page 1-17 of the General Plan which earmarks approximately 500 acres for open space and park lands. The Plan mandates that upon the development of designated properties, 75°x6 of the land holdings will revert to the City as dedicated open space. C/Herrera reiterated that the City has the potential to acquire approximately 350 acres of park land and open space at no cost. Council members are elected to serve the community at large and not special interest groups or areas. She stated that selling Lots 92 and 93 and using the sale proceeds for construction of a multi-purpose facility in a central location of the community is, in her opinion, the most effective decision. WVUSD made a commitment to donate 3.8 acres to the City and the District will abide by the commitment. The prolonged discussion concerns the most suitable location. C/Herrera moved, MPT/Huff seconded to 1) declare the property surplus; 2) approve the sale of public property; 3) direct the City JULY 2, 1996 PAGE 9 Manager to notice public agencies and, if no offer is received within 60 days, negotiate with private parties and 4) place the proceeds of the sale in a parks and recreational facilities development fund. C/Werner stated that the City purchased the property in 1992. He referred to the June 30, 1992 Council Minutes which indicated that purchase of the property in question was approved by a vote of 4-0 with Council member Papen being absent. The Minutes further indicated that CM/Belanger responded to a citizen that "At the present time there are no plans for the property." No other statements or commitments regarding use of the property are recorded in the Minutes. In response to C/Wemer, CM/Belanger stated that the Daily Bulletin reported that the two parcels were last appraised at $1.3 million according to the City. The article is incorrect and there is no reference to an offer. An appraisal was completed, the dollar amount of which has not been divulged. C/Werner requested that the final document clearly identify all issues. Further, he pointed out that there are no Council districts in D.B. and the Council represents the entire City. Since Incorporation, Peterson Park has been completed at a cost of approximately $300,000 and the 23 acre Pantera Park is under construction at a proposed cost of $2 million. MPT/Huff stated that the fate of Sandstone Canyon is a moot point and is not under consideration at this time. He further stated he finds it ironic that when C/Harmony initially questioned whether the City could justify the purchase of the property, he would now question the sale of the property. General fund monies were used for the property purchase. He indicated that in his opinion, it is most appropriate for the Parks & Recreation Commission to consider the best location for parks and park facilities. He referred to C/Harmony's comparison of property values wherein .C/Harmony compared the value of commercial property to the value of the City owned raw land. He stated that due to the anticipated revenue shortfall, the City may acquire property at no cost and lack the funds for development. In his opinion, the wise and prudent fiscal approach is to set aside funds for future development in accordance with the Parks Master Plan. On the motion made earlier by C/Herrera, seconded by MPT/Huff, the following Roll Call vote was taken: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Herrera, Werner, MPT/Huff, M/Ansari NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Harmony JULY 2, 1996 PAGE 10 ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None _ i M/Ansari suggested that a Town Hall Meeting be held as soon as possible between the Parks & Recreation Commission and Council to discuss the Parks Master Plan. 7. OLD BUSINESS: 7.2 REQUEST FROM DIAMOND BAR CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOR CITY FUNDING - CM/BelarW stated that the Chamber of Commerce submitted a proposed Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) setting forth a proposal for provision of services, projects and other activities by which the Chamber would provide services for and on behalf of the City in exchange for funding in the amount of $52,450. Art O'Daly, D.B. Chamber of Commerce, stated that he had not been designated to represent the Chamber but it was his understanding that the Chamber would like to have the item continued to July 16, 1996. Without objection, Council concurred. 8. NEW BUSINESS: None RECESS: M/Ansari recessed the meeting at 10:25 p.m. 9. DIAMOND BAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING (Minutes produced separately) RECONVENE: M/Ansari reconvened the City Council meeting at 10:35 p.m. 7. OLD BUSINESS: (Continued) 7.1 RESOLUTION NO. 96-51: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR SETTING FORTH PERSONNEL RULES AND REGULATIONS REGARDING THE PAYMENT OF SALARIES, SICK LEAVE, VACATIONS, LEAVES OF ABSENCES, AND OTHER REGULATIONS AND REPEALING RESOLUTIONS 90-45 THROUGH 90-45K - CM/Belanger gave the staff report and recommended that all staff salary classifications receive a 3.5% cost of living salary increase plus an increase of $50 per month in the cafeteria benefit amount. C/Herrera moved, WAnsari seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 96-51. C/Wemer requested the motion be amended to split consideration of the vote into two separate issues: 1) 3.5°% cost of living salary increase and 2) $50 increase in the Cafeteria benefit amount. .C/Herrera and M/Ansari concurred with the request to amend the JULY 2, 1996 PAGE 11 i - motion. MPT/Huff reiterated his preference for a 1.7°x6 cost of living increase plus $25,000 for discretionary merit -based bonuses allocated by the City Manager. In response to M/Ansari, CM/Belanger stated that cost of living increases for employees for the previous six years totaled 16.4%. The CPI for the same period was 24.8%. In response to C/Harmony, CM/Belanger explained that the essence of staff s recommendation is to deal with the difference in the actual CPI changes and the cost of living adjustments that have been approved in previous years. The recommended 3.5% cost of living increase represents a step in the catch up process. C/Werner stated that due to overzealous newspaper reporting indicating his approval of this item, he would abstain from voting on Resolution No. 96-51 and would prefer the item be continued to a later date. —� C/Herrera moved, WAnsari seconded, to continue the item to July 16, 1996. With consensus of Council, the matter was continued. 7.3 FRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY PROPOSAL - The Friends of the Library indicated that it will commit $8,000 toward the renovation of the U.B. Branch Library facility. They have asked whether the City would be interested in joining with them in the refurbishing project. The City's Library Services Fund has an allocation reserve for Fiscal Year 1996-1997 of $88,000. CM/Belanger recommended that Council consider approval of $20,000 as the City's participation in the refurbishing project to be determined based upon the needs list provided by the L.A. County Library District. M/Ansari recommended further consideration of this item. C/Harmony requested cost estimates for razing the current Library building and constructing a new two-story structure with underground parking. M/Ansari moved, C/Wemer seconded, to return the item to staff, that each Council Member submit a list of concerns, and that the Council meet with the Friends of the Library for further discussion of this matter. With consensus of Council, the matter was continued to a future date. JULY 2, 1996 PAGE 12 10. COUNCIL SUB -COMMITTEE REPORTS: C/Herrera stated that on June 7, 1996 several citizens attended an Economic Development workshop. The City continues its efforts toward improving economic development by attracting businesses to the community. C/Wemer reported that several hazardous waste dump opportunities will be available to citizens during July. Citizens may obtain site location information from City On -Line or City Hall. MPT/Huff suggested the formation of a community based citizen's committee to provide input to the Parks Master Plan ad hoc subcommittee. 11. COUNCIL COMMENTS: None 12. ANNOUNCEMENTS: None 13. CLOSED SESSION: None held. 12. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to conduct, M/Ansari adjourned the meeting at 11:10 p.m. ATTEST: Mayor LY DA BURGESS, City Clerk -