Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/24/1995 Minutes - Adj. Regular MeetingMINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR JANUARY 24, 1995 1. CALL TO ORDER: M/Papen called the meeting to order at 6:04 p.m. at the South Coast Air Quality Management District Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by C/Harmony. ROLL CALL: Council Members Ansari, Harmony, Miller and Mayor Papen. Mayor Pro Tem Werner was excused. Also present were Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager; Michael Montgomery, Interim City Attorney; Tun DeStefano, Community Development Director and Lynda Burgess, City Clerk. 2. PUBLIC HEARING: PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES ELEMENT 2.1 ADOPTION OF THE GENERAL PLAN - Regarding the Public Services and Facilities Element, M/Papen referred the Council to proposed wording of Strategies 1.1.2, 1.1.3 and 1.1.4, Page VI -4 provided by staff. In addition, due to his absence, MPT/Werner submitted written recommendations for changes to this Element. CDD/DeStefano recommended language as follows for Strategy 1.1.2: "Protect existing residents and businesses from the cost of financing inf utructure aimed at supporting new development or the intensification of development." Without objection, Council concurred. With respect to Strategy 1.1.3, CDD/DeStefano suggested "Require the construction of water, sewer, drainage and other necessary public facilities prior to or concurrent with each new development." Without objection, Council concurred. Regarding 1.1.4, CDD/DeStefano suggested "Require the project sponsor to provide all necessary infrastructure improvements including the pro -rata share of system -wide improvements." Without objection, Council concurred. CDD/DeStefano continued to page VI -4, Strategy 1.1.5b suggesting the following language: "Support the development of appropriately -sited, environmentally sensitive, solid waste treatment facilities which do not impact residents' quality of life." Without objection, Council concurred. Referencing Strategy 1.1.6, Page VI -5, CDD/DeStefano suggested "Require that all new subdivisions be connected to a public sewage system." Without objection, Council concurred JANUARY 24 , 1995 PAGE 2 Suggested wording for Objective 1.2, Page VI -5, from MPT/Werner: "Establish and implement solutions to the financing of public facilities and services which best protect the interests of the taxpayer." Without objection, Council concurred. Regarding Strategy 1.2.1, the following was suggested by MPT/Werner: "Establish a development fee structure which best assures that costs for new capital facilities and expansion of existing facilities necessitated by the approval of new development or intensification of existing development are funded by the proponents or beneficiaries of projects in proportion to the demand created by the development." Without objection, Council concurred. With respect to Strategy 1.2.2, MPT/Werner proposed "Investigate and, if feasible, initiate the establishment of a redevelopment agency in the City of Diamond Bar to facilitate the mitigation of traffic and circulation deficiencies, the financing of public improvements and other similar tasks." Without objection, Council concurred. With respect to Objective 1.3, Page VI -5, CDD/DeStefano recommended --- "Provide residents with access to high quality local educational facilities." Without objection, Council concurred. The following language was suggested by MPT/Werner for a new strategy 1.3.4, Page VI -5: "Enable, through appropriate zoning, development regulations, or with a Conditional Use Permit, the construction and operation of private school facilities." Without objection, Council concurred. In response to M/Papen, CDD/DeStefano stated that Objective 1.5 and all sub -strategies was originally a component of the Land Use Element. The Planning Commission recommended that it be moved from the Land Use Element to the Public Services and Facilities Element. This Objective and attached Strategies attempts to achieve a hierarchy of social gathering places for the community, both on private and public lands. M/Papen suggested the following language for Strategy 1.5.1, Page VI -6: "Retain and provide community social gathering places, including active and natural park lands and one or more community centers. In private commercial and office complexes, encourage the development of plaza areas." Without objection, Council concurred. With respect to Strategy 1.5.2x., MPT/Werner recommended deleting the words "and firmly fix the event(s) in the mind of the public" so the Strategy reads: "Whenever possible, establish permanent locations and regular dates for community events to improve attendance." Without objection, Council concurred. JANUARY 24, 1995 PAGE 3 Regarding Strategy 1.5.3, MPT/Werner suggested incorporating the addition of "park" proposed by Wilbur Smith as "Within new residential developments, encourage organization of individual neighborhoods and discourage through traffic on local streets while maintaining pedestrian and bicycle continuity and encourage neighborhood parks, improvement programs and social events." Without objection, Council concurred. With respect to Goal 2, Page VI -6, MPT/Werner recommended "Consistent with the Vision Statement" so that the goal reads "Consistent with the Vision Statement, achieve a fiscally solvent, financially stable community." Without objection, Council concurred. Regarding Objective 2. 1, Page VI -6, MPT/Werner suggested deleting "ensure adequate" and replace it with "maximize" so that it reads "Provide sufficient opportunities for retail and other nonresidential commercial and office uses as necessary to maximize municipal income to finance desired community amenities." Without objection, Council concurred. Council adopted, without objection, Mr. Neely's recommended language for Strategy 2.1.2, Page VI -6 "Work with State officials and local elected representatives to make a determined effort to promote statewide legislation that would segue guaranteed, long-term stable financing of local government based upon primarily property tax revenues. Alternatively, support legislation that would redistribute sales tax revenues to local agencies based upon an equitable formula that would include both the location where the sales tax revenue was collected and the population of each local agency involved." MPT/Werner suggested the following language to replace Strategy 2.1.4: "Utilize public cowbenefit and/or fiscal impact analyses in the review of new development proposals and in determining acceptability." Without objection, Council concurred. In response to M/Papen, CM/Belanger suggested with respect to Strategy 2.2.1, "Conduct a periodic review of user charges, development fees and public facilities impact mitigation fees in accordance with California Government Code Section 66000 et al, (AB1600) to ensure that the charges are consistent with the costs of improvement and maintenance, and that public services and facilities are being expanded in a cost-effective manner." Regarding Objective 2.3, VI -7, MPT/Werner suggested "Promote public and private services and amenities to the community." Without objection, Council concurred. M/Papen concluded deliberation on the Public Services and Facilities Element and requested that the two remaining revisions on Page VI -3, paragraphs 2 JANUARY 24, 1995 PAGE 4 and 3 be deliberated at the January 30, 1995 Council meeting. PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY ELEMENT Regarding the Public Health and Safety Element, CDD/DeStefano reported that the Element establishes policies and programs to protect the community from risks associated with seismic, geologic, flood and fire hazards. It is comprised of two State required elements: 1) the Noise Element, which has been required of the City's General Plan since 1971. The Noise Element incorporates issues related to existing noise, environment, sources of noise, and the impacts of noise upon residents. The Element identifies the sources, existing and projected levels of noise, and methods of attenuation. Major noise issues for D.B. revolve around the desire to prohibit new development from adversely affecting existing land uses. Strategies have been put in place to ensure that future developments incorporate noise studies to identify and mitigate all noise impacts. In regard to the second State required component 2) The Safety Element has been required by law since 1976. This element requires cities to identify potential safety hazards and adopt policies related to the protection of people and property from fire, flooding, geologic and seismic hazards. The City's local relevant safety issues include the need to protect residents from the hazards identified and ensure that appropriate levels of public safety personnel services and facilities are provided. He recommended that the Council receive a brief supplemental presentation from Pat Mann, CottonBeland Associates, Inc., regarding the Noise Element, open the Public Hearing and receive testimony, review the Element and continue the Public Hearing to the next meeting. Mr. Mann discussed how noise is measured, how noise standards are set and how most noise experienced by communities comes from transportation sources. Although most noise complaints come from people's behavior, this is not something the General Plan attempts to address. The General Plan is mainly concerned with the compatibility of land uses in areas exposed to noise. In order to practically regulate the technical aspects of noise, an attempt is made to reduce the noise environment to a single measurement value. In order to assist the Council, he referred to State and National guidelines for land uses. M/Papen declared the Public Hearing open. Don Schad, 1824 Shaded Wood Rd., stated that the level at Peterson Park occasionally exceeds 100 decimals. He felt this is very damaging to the children over a prolonged period of time. In addition, he indicated he has recorded decibel levels of 80 inside the homes at peak hours along the easterly hill along the SR 57 north of Pathfinder Rd. and south of the SR 60. JANUARY 24, 1995 PAGE 5 C/Miller asked Mr. Schad how the City should deal with a table and noise standards within the General Plan knowing that the noise levels at the proposed high school and other locations will far exceed the acceptable levels. Mr. Schad suggested one method could be the architecture and development of the proposed buildings. Other buffer zones might be created using a form of zigzag walls. Max Maxwell, 3211 Bent Twig Ln., agreed with Mr. Schad that the noise levels should be kept low. He asked the Council to consider the impact of noise levels on the enjoyment of neighborhood yards. Wilbur Smith, 21630 Fairwind Ln., stated, with respect to Page IV4, c., Public Health and Safety issues 1, Geology and Seismicity, the comments should be greatly expanded upon. He further stated there is not sufficient attention given to geology under Goal 1, Page IV -7. He asked the Council to address the concerns of excessive water and the dynamic geologic conditions as a single item. There being no further testimony offered, M/Papen closed the Public Hearing. Responding to Mr. Smith, M/Papen stated the Development Code would address the specifics. Regarding IV -2, M/Papen and C/Ansari suggested that the second paragraph under 1, Geology and Seismicity, be changed to read "There are existing historical landslides and potential unstable hillside areas in Diamond Bar." C/Mller recommended the last sentence, paragraph 1 under 3, Fire Protection Services, Page IV -3 be changed to "The sphere of influence area adjacent to Tonner Canyon does not presently have (or need) these same levels of protection." In response to M/Papen, CM/Belanger stated staff would provide all fire station numbers in the second sentence, paragraph 2 under 3, Fire Protection Services. In accordance with Mr. Schad's wishes, C/Mller recommended that the fourth sentence, first paragraph under 8, Noise, Page IV4 be stricken. Responding to Council regarding the ambiguity of paragraph 2 under 8, Noise, Page IV4, CDD/DeStefano recommended the Council give staff an opportunity to indicate, through text and graphics, the concerns of the Council. JANUARY 24, 1995 PAGE 6 CM/Belanger indicated staff may create Page IV -14 to incorporate the document to include the foundation for this information. M/Papen suggested under 8, Noise, Page IV -6, Issue Analysis, that "rural lifestyle" be changed to "quality of life" to read "Emphasizing its important on quality of life, the City needs clear policies on how it will keep noise, primarily from major roadways, from impacting existing as well as future residents." Without objections, Council concurred. Per MPT/Werner's wishes, M/Papen recommended changing Goal 1, Page IV -7 to read "Consistent with the Vision Statement, create a secure public environment which minimizes potential loss of life and property damage, as well as social, economic or environmental disruption resulting from natural and manmade disasters." Without objection, Council concurred. C/Miller recommended changing Strategy 1.2.1, Page IV -7, to read "Where applicable, as a prerequisite to new development or the intensification of existing development, ensure that a drainage study has been completed by a qualified engineer, certifying that the proposed development will be --� adequately protected, and that implementation of the development proposal will not create new downstream flood hazards." Without objection, Council concurred. Regarding Objective 1.2, M/Papen recommended striking "eliminate" and "minimize" and move "minimize" to the beginning of the sentence so that it reads "Minimize the potential for loss of life, physical injury, property damage, public health hazards and nuisances from the effects of a 100 -year storm and associated flooding." Without objection, Council concurred. Responding to M/Papen, CMBelanger suggested the first sentence of Strategy 1.8.1, Page IV -9 be changed to "Coordinate with the established Los Angeles County Program for household hazardous waste collection according to the provision of Section 41500 of the Public Resources Code (see also the solid waste section of the Plan for Resource Management for additional policies)." In response to C/Miller, CM/Belanger recommended Strategy 1.5.1, Page IV -8 be reworded as follows: "Refer proposals for new development and, where appropriate, for the intensification of existing development to the Sheriffs Department for review." — With respect to Strategy 1.10.5, Page IV -11, add "Prior to occupancy" at the beginning of the last sentence so that it reads: "Prior to occupancy, if the required level of mitigation is not achieved, further corrective action will be required. JANUARY 24, 1995 PAGE 7 M/Papen recommended that Strategy 1.10.11, Page IV -11 be stricken. Mr. Mann agreed. C/Miller moved, C/Ansari seconded, based upon M/Papen's request, that the Public Services and Facilities Element be amended as proposed, released to the community at the earliest date and brought back to Council for approval in 30 days. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, Harmony, Miller, M/Papen NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - MPT/Werner CftvMer moved, C/Ansari seconded to direct staff, based upon the proposed changes, to prepare the changes to the Public Health and Safety Element for public review expeditiously and bring the finished document back to the Council for approval in 30 days. With the following Roll Call vote, motion carried: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, Harmony, Miller, M/Papen NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - MPT/Werner 3. ANNOUNCEMENTS: None 4. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to conduct, M/Papen declared the meeting adjourned at 8:15 p.m. to January 31; 1995 at 6:00 p.m. to discuss the Circulation Element. L��URGESS,Clerk ATTEST: Mayor