HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/07/1993 Minutes - Regular MeetingMINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
DECEMBER 7, 1993
1. CALL TO ORDER: M/Miller called the meeting to
order at 6:00 p.m. in the AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E.
Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The audience was led in the
Pledge of Allegiance by Mr. Red Calkins.
INVOCATION: The Invocation was presented by
Pastor Robert Clayton, Diamond Bar Worship Center; Mrs.
Rachel Natiiv, Temple Shalom; Reverend Margaret Hedden,
New Life Fellowship Church; Reverend Wonkyu Shin, Sam
Sung Korean Presbyterian Church; Dr. Ahmed Sakr, Walnut
Valley Islamic Center; and, Ram Parasher.
ROLL CALL: Mayor Miller, Mayor Pro Tem
Papen, Council Members Werner, Forbing and MacBride.
Also present were Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager;
Andrew V. Arczynski, City Attorney; James DeStefano,
Community Development Director; George Wentz, Interim
City Engineer; Bob Rose, Community Services Director and
City Clerk Lynda Burgess.
2. PRESENTATIONS:
2.1 M/Miller presented a City Tile to Mr. Joe Ruzicka
in appreciation for his dedicated service as a
member of the Board of Directors on the Diamond Bar
Improvement Association for the past six years.
3. CONSENT CALENDAR:
3.1 APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
3.1.1 Regular meeting of November 2, 1993 -
Approved as submitted.
3.1.2 Regular meeting of November 16, 1993 -
Approved as submitted.
3.4 TREASURER'S REPORT - Month of October, 1993 -
Received and filed.
3.5 REJECTED CLAIM FOR DAMAGES:
3.5.1 Claim for indemnification filed by L.A.
County November 3, 1993 in the matter of
Neal Charles Dewitt, et al., V. City of
Diamond Bar and referred the matter for
further action to Carl Warren & Co., the
City's Risk Manager.
3.5.2 Claim for indemnification filed by L.A.
County November 3, 1993 in the matter of
Fernando
DECEMBER 7, 1993 PAGE 2
Diaz v. County of Los Angeles, et al and
referred the matter for further action to
Carl Warren & Co., the City's Risk
Manager.
3.6 APPROVED EXONERATION OF GRADING SURETY BOND POSTED
FOR 2500 CROWFOOT - Approved work completed and
exonerated Surety Bond No. 3-05-01025-6 posted for
grading in the amount of $28,000.
3.7 ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 93-77: A RESOLUTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR,
CALIFORNIA, RECITING THE FACT OF THE GENERAL
MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD ON NOVEMBER 2, 1993,
DECLARING THE RESULT AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS
PROVIDED BY LAW.
3.8 APPROVED MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR THE GRAND
AVENUE TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION/ARTERIAL
IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE LOS
ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION
AUTHORITY (MTA).
MATTERS WITHDRAWN FROM CONSENT CALENDAR:
3.2 CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 995 LEGAL
DEFENSE IN THE MATTER OF GROSS V. MILLER; AND, -
REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT - CM/Belanger recommended
that the City Council memorialize and ratify the
agreement between the City and the law firm of
Wildish & Nialis and that the City Council enter
into an agreement for reimbursement between the
City and Gary G. Miller and that an invoice for
$5,328 be paid.
CM/Belanger, in response to C/Werner, stated that
all agreements entered into by the City Council are
subject to review. The City Council has the
authority to con-tinue with an agreement, rescind
it or terminate it through the provisions of the
agreement within their discretion.
M/Miller explained that he directed staff to
prepare a reimbursement agreement, subject to the
conditions listed.
CA/Arczynski stated that California Government Code
955 obligates a city to pay for defense and
indemnity of any employee (which includes City --
Council members) in the event of a judgment for
acts or omissions. The law provides the City with
the ability to deny the defense and refuse to
indemnify, in the event certain specified findings
are made, such as corruption, fraud, actual malice
or the employee was not in the course and scope of
DECEMBER 7, 1993
PAGE 3
employment of the time of the injury.
Oscar Law expressed concern that the pending
lawsuit against M/Miller is more of a personal
matter than a business matter.
M/Miller explained that the litigation relates to
an accusation made that he, as Mayor, not as a
private individual, had spoken inappropriately at a
realtors caravan.
William Gross began to explain the circumstances
relating to the litigation of Gross v. Miller.
MPT/Papen questioned the appropriateness of
discussing the matter during public comments.
CA/Arczynski stated that Mr. Gross does have the
right to question the agreement and express his
belief that the City should not ratify the
agreement; however, this is probably an improper
forum to discuss the merits of the litigation.
Mr. Gross pointed out that Miller v. Gross was a
personal litigation that was dismissed and that
Case No. KC014266 is the same Case No. as the cross
complaint, Gross v. Miller. The taxpayers should
not have to pay for the litigation costs involved
in this cross complaint because it, too, is a
personal matter. He pointed out that it is
inappropriate for C/Forbing and C/MacBride to vote
on the matter since they have been elected out of
office.
Max Maxwell expressed concern that the City is
being asked to pay for the costs relating to this
personal litigation matter. He suggested that the
issue be post-poned to allow further investigation,
and that it be placed on a future agenda as an item
for discussion, and not as an item on the Consent
Calendar.
Lawrence Rhoads pointed out that the agreement is
con-ditioned whereby if it is proved that the Mayor
was not working within his capacity as Mayor, then
the City does not have to pay the litigation fees.
Barbara Beach-Courchesne stated that since the
Mayor initiated the first complaint, a personal
lawsuit that created this cross complaint, then it
should remain the Mayor's obligation to pay the
litigation fees involved.
M/Miller clarified that he paid for the lawsuit
filed against Mr. Gross, not the City. He
DECEMBER 7, 1993
PAGE 4
reiterated that Mr. Gross filed a lawsuit against
him for a speaking engagement as Mayor of the City
of Diamond Bar.
C/Forbing moved, MPT/Papen seconded to memorialize
and ratify the agreement between the City and the
law firm of Wildish & Nialis; to enter into an
agreement for reim-bursement between the City, and
Gary G. Miller and that an invoice for $5,328 be
paid with the understanding that M/Miller agrees to
reimburse the City for any and all legal fees and
costs paid for if it is determined that his act or
omission was not within the scope of his
employment, or if it was determined that he acted,
or failed to act because of actual fraud,
corruption, or actual malice. With the following
Roll Call vote, motion carried:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Forbing, MacBride,
MPT/Papen, M/Miller
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS - Werner
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS - None
3.3 WARRANT REGISTER - MPT/Papen stated that the City
Council, last year, scheduled $2,500 for City
Council education and training, which to date, has
not been used. She noted that the Warrant Register
includes a request from two Council members to
attend a team building workshop hosted by the
League of California Cities at a cost of $2,500.
Since only 2 of the 5 Council members would be
attending the meeting, and the entire budgeted
amount would be used towards the cost of the
workshop, MPT/Papen suggested that it may be
appropriate to pull this item from the Warrant
Register, to be discussed at a later date when the
new Council members have been installed.
MPT/Papen moved, C/MacBride seconded to approve the
Warrant Register, withdrawing a request from two
Council members to attend a team building workshop
at a cost of $2,500 for further discussion. With
the following Roll Call vote, motion carried:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Werner, Forbing,
MacBride, MPT/Papen,
M/Miller
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None
4. ADMINISTRATION OF OATHS OF OFFICE:
4.1 PRESENTATIONS TO COUNCILMEMBERS JOHN FORBING AND
DEXTER MACBRIDE - M/Miller recognized Councilmember
Dexter MacBride for his outstanding dedication to
DECEMBER 7, 1993 PAGE 5
the City as a member of the City Council.
C/MacBride expressed his appreciation to the City.
He then encouraged the community to become involved
in opposing the location of the City of Industry's
proposed Materials Recovery Facility (MRF), to be
located at the border of Diamond Bar next to the
YMCA, Lanterman, and the little league fields.
M/Miller recognized Councilmember John Forbing for
his outstanding dedication to the City as a member
of the City Council.
4.1.1 PRESENTATIONS BY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE -
Cathy Cook, the President of the Diamond
Bar Chamber of Commerce, presented
C/MacBride with a Certificate of
Appreciation for his support and service
given to the Chamber.
Cathy Cook presented C/Forbing with a
Certificate of Appreciation for his
support and service given to the Chamber.
Ann Stephens, representing L.A. County
Supervisor Dean Dana, presented plaques
to C/MacBride and C/Forbing to express
appre-ciation for their dedication and
service as Council Members for the City
of Diamond Bar.
4.2 SWEARING-IN OF COUNCILMEMBERS-ELECT - EILEEN R.
ANSARI, CLAIR W. HARMONY AND GARY H. WERNER -
Assemblyman Paul V. Horcher administered the Oaths
of Office to Clair Harmony, Eileen Ansari and Gary
Werner as Council Members for the City.
4.3 REORGANIZATION OF CITY COUNCIL:
4.3.1 SELECTION OF MAYOR - C/Harmony moved,
C/Ansari seconded the nomination of
C/Werner as mayor. With the following
Roll Call vote, motion carried:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Harmony,
Ansari,
Werner
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Papen,
Miller
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None
4.3.2 SELECTION OF MAYOR PRO TEM - M/Werner
moved, C/Ansari seconded to nominate
C/Harmony as Mayor Pro Tem.
DECEMBER 7, 1993
PAGE 6
C/Papen nominated C/Ansari as Mayor Pro
Tem. Nomination died for lack of second.
With the following Roll Call vote,
C/Harmony was elected Mayor Pro Tem:
AYES:
COUNCIL MEMBERS
- Ansari,
Harmony,
M/Werner
NOES:
COUNCIL MEMBERS
- Papen
ABSTAIN:
COUNCIL MEMBERS
- Miller
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS -
None
4.4 PRESENTATION TO MAYOR GARY G. MILLER - M/Werner
presented C/Miller with a gavel as the City's token
of appreciation for his dedicated service as Mayor
of the City Council.
C/Papen expressed apprecation to Mr. MacBride and
Mr. Forbing for their service and dedication to the
City through the past years. She then thanked the
community for their participation in the YMCA book
sale, which netted over $3,400. She then reported
that the charges against C/Miller and herself had
been dropped regarding the lawsuit involving
Diamond Bar Associates v. the City. She also
reported that the Industry Metrolink Station is the
number one station in the whole Metrolink system,
carrying 40% of the total ridership for the
Riverside line. She stated that by the first of
January 1994, there will be two exits to the
parking lot --one of them with a traffic signal on
Brea Canyon Road.
John Lee, with Mayor Riordon's Office, presented a
Certificate of Congratulations to M/Werner and
extended congratulations to MPT/Harmony and
C/Ansari.
RECESS: M/Werner recessed the meeting at 7:30 p.m. for a
reception.
RECONVENE: M/Werner reconvened the meeting at 7:45 p.m.
5. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Patti Anis, 1125 Bramford Ct.,
read a letter from Nick Anis congratulating the elected
Council Members and inquiring when the election for the
General Plan would be held.
Dave Reynolds, 1160-C N. Golden Springs, presented a
general overview of recycling as it related to the waste
diversion report. He pointed out that if the City was to
maximize the participation in the collection of
DECEMBER 7, 1993 PAGE 7
recyclables, then a MRF, such as the one proposed in the
City of Industry, would not be economically viable
because there would not be enough material to be
recovered out of the MRF. He suggested that there be
joint lobbying efforts to domestic and unused market
development to deal with the effects of the waste
diversion laws in place.
George Barrett congratulated the elected Council Members.
He suggested that the Council consider changing the
format of the meetings to respond to comments made by the
public while he/she is still at the podium.
Lydia Plunk, 1522 Deerfoot Dr., requested that the
Council direct staff to explore the idea of the Oak Tree
as the City Tree.
Robert Quartucy, resident and President of the D.B.
Lively Senior Citizens, thanked the Council on behalf of
the Seniors for the new Community Center. He also
acknowledged the efforts of staff, particularly CSD/Rose,
AA/Fritzal and AA/Barlow.
Michael Yoder, 18881 Von Karmen, Irvine, representing
i Diamond Bar Associates, referring to statements made by
C/Papen and C/Miller regarding the lawsuit Diamond Bar
Associates v. the City, clarified that the court has
found that C/Miller and C/Papen were immune from being
sued personally, and that the City must defend against
the charges. He also stated that Diamond Bar Associates
had unsuccessfully attempted to get a resolution on the
merits, and they had not been given an opportunity to
answer questions asked by the City's expert consultants
in connection with Tract 147850.
CA/Arczynski stated that the Council has been fully
apprised during Closed Session discussions of the status
of the matter and further statements to Mr. Yoder need
not be made at this time.
C/Papen requested that the City Clerk prepare a verbatim
transcript of Mr. Yoder's remarks and forward the
statement to the attorneys handling the lawsuit for the
City. She noted that the subject project was denied
without prejudice, giving Diamond Bar Associates the
opportunity to reapply and go through the Planning
Commission. The City has also offered binding
arbitration, but it has been rejected. She then stated
that Diamond Bar Associates donated $4,100 to M/Werner's
re-election campaign and $3,500 to MPT/Harmony's
campaign.
Mr. Chiman Kotecha congratulated the elected Council
Members, and wished them wisdom in their decision
makings.
DECEMBER 7, 1993 PAGE 8
Don Schad congratulated the new Council Members. He
offered his assistance to the Council as needed.
Terry Birrell, 1528 S. Gold Canyon Dr., congratulated the
new Council Members. She then made various comments
regarding the recall attempt of C/Papen and stated that
she feels there is a conflict of interest involving
C/Papen and the exclusive trash hauling issue.
C/Papen requested a verbatim transcript of the statements
made by Ms. Birrell. She responded to some of the
comments made and expressed concern that she is
continually being harrassed.
MPT/Harmony stated that it is inappropriate to use staff
time to make a transcript of Ms. Birrell's comments since
they relate to Mr. Lowe.
M/Werner noted that, since there doesn't seem to be any
objections among the Council to C/Papen's request, it was
appropriate for C/Papen to receive a transcript of the
comments made.
Barbara Beach-Courchesne congratulated the elected
Council members. She expressed support of the recall
efforts of Council Members Miller and Papen.
Max Maxwell congratulated the elected Council Members.
He stated that he would be presenting a document to the
City Council containing information relating to some of
C/ Miller's actions regarding three issues: the South
Pointe Master Plan, the Grand Ave. Agreement and his
association with RnP. He requested that the information
be fully investigated and presented to the FPPC with a
request for a response as to its status quo. He
expressed support for the recall of Council Members Papen
and Miller.
Frank Dursa, 2533 Harmony Hill Dr., congratulated the
elected Council Members and requested an audit of all
costs related to the General Plan, to include all the
attorney's fees paid by the City over and above the
normal retainer fees, as well as other attorney's fees
for lawsuits brought about by C/Miller and C/Papen. He
expressed support for the recall efforts of C/Miller and
C/Papen and suggested that both consider resigning from
the Council.
C/Miller stated that he was elected into office by a
fairly significant part of the community and he would
remain until voted out of office.
William Gross also requested that the City review and
investigate the lawsuits brought about by Council Members
DECEMBER 7, 1993 PAGE 9
in the past as a way to determine a constructive solution
to end the bickering and resolve the issues. He then
expressed support for the recall efforts of Council
Members Miller and Papen.
M/Werner expressed his concern regarding the
effectiveness of the new City Council if much of the time
is to be taken with continuous negative statements. He
requested that the community give the Council the
opportunity to pursue many of the avenues and suggestions
voiced over the last two years. The City Council is
anxious to begin making the progress needed to move the
City forward. He suggested that it may be beneficial if
those involved in the recall efforts and those subject to
recall efforts to refrain from making comments, which do
not belong at this forum, so that the City Council can
conduct City business.
Lawrence Rhoads concurred that this is not the
appropriate forum to establish a recall, even though
there is a lot of support from the citizens.
Jim Paul congratulated the new councilmembers.
Ken Anderson requested the City Council to direct staff
to request the Sheriff's Department to investigate the
tearing down of recall signs thoughout the City.
C/Papen questioned if the temporary recall signs being
posted throughout the community on telepone poles and
private driveways are allowed per the City's sign
ordinance. In deference to the comments made regarding
the number of lawsuits filed, C/Papen then asked Mr.
Anderson to drop his lawsuit against the City.
Mr. Anderson stated that, since the lawsuit filed is for
due process to assure that the City honor the condition
of the CUP for the Country Hills Towne Center prohibiting
a restaurant with a cocktail lounge or bar because of the
mixed use, and because of the shared parking situation,
he would not drop the lawsuit.
CA/Arczynski, in response to C/Papen's inquiry regarding
the temporary signs, stated that the phone company and
Southern California Edison have requested, in writing,
that the City remove such signs from their facilities
because of safety factors to their personnel.
Furthermore, such signs attached to parkway trees and
such are prohibited by the City.
CM/Belanger stated that the signs have been defined as
signs on private property, which means they do not fall
under the provisions of the temporary sign ordinance as
presently written. He stated that he is not aware of
City staff removing signs under the provisions of the
DECEMBER 7, 1993 PAGE 10
code.
MPT/Harmony noted that the enforcement of political signs
are part of the non -complying type sign provisions. He
stated that whether a referendum or a recall has been
certified, it is still a political process and citizens
deserve the right of freedom of speech and expression.
The Sign Ordinance should be given some reconsideration.
Beni Omi requested C/Miller and C/Papen to resign.
John Katowski, 1856 Kiowa Crest Dr., suggested that the
City consider doing away with public works signs posted
at almost every government project because it insinuates
that it is being paid for by the listed political powers
and not by the people. He pointed out that the City
needs to start paying attention to other problems in the
City other than develop -went such as emerging gangs and
idle youngsters needing direction.
6. COUNCIL COMMENTS: C/Miller inquired as to the
number of lawsuits filed by D.B. Citizens to Protect
Country Living.
CA/Arczynski recalled two specific lawsuits with
additional actions filed under the first. In response to
another inquiry by C/Miller, he stated that he does not
recall receiving direction nor comment from C/Miller to
either file against anyone or consider suing people in
this community.
C/Ansari thanked those who supported her election. She
stated that the City needs to get back to business,
beginning by dealing with the General Plan, the proposed
MRF and the decrease in library services.
MPT/Harmony suggested that since there is not a lot of
public support for the General Plan, it would be inappro-
priate to expend a lot of money for a public vote. He
suggested that the document be returned to a Citizens
Committee to refine the document within a 90 to 120 day
process. He stressed the importance of open government,
inviting and encouraging those interested to be involved.
He then recommended that the Council tape record the
Executive Sessions so that there is a record of what is
said, hopefully encouraging Council members to act pro-
fessionally. Also, Roberts Rules of order needs to be
instituted. He stressed the importance of having good
relations with congressional and state delegations for
the City's well being to gain support in such issues as
the proposed MRF. He then announced that there would be
an outreach program at Ken's Hardware with
representatives from the Walnut Valley School District,
Commissions and City Council to obtain opinions from
citizens. He also announced that the Stonegate Sycamore
DECEMBER 7, 1993 PAGE 11
tract installed Christmas lights and that Coyote Springs
residents will also have Christmas lights, with a New
Year's Day parade and a chili cookoff. He then concurred
that public works project signs should indicate that a
project has been paid for by the citizens.
M/Werner thanked those who supported his re-election, and
stressed the importance of returning back to City
business. He concurred with MPT/Harmony that the Council
needs to be made more user friendly, and that City
offices should be accessible to the public so that the
public feels welcome to meet with members of staff or the
Council. He requested that staff draft a resolution
adjusting meeting times from 6:00 p.m. to 7:30 p.m.
M/Werner stated that he would prefer that the Council
provide an immediate response, or as quickly as possible,
to any comment or issue brought before the Council. He
then stated that the General Plan should be rescinded and
that a committee should be formed consisting of
representatives from citizens' groups, property owners,
developers and representatives from each of the City's
commissions to review the General Plan and identify those
issues that need to be dealt with to the satisfaction of
— the Council. He indicated that he would like to remove
as many lawsuits as possible, bringing matters back to
this particular forum so that the Council can deal with
the issues. He requested that the City Attorney pursue
allegations of conflict of interest as brought forth by
Mr. Maxwell. In regard to the South Pointe Master Plan,
he expressed concern that it is improper for the Council
to act as both a regulator of the entitlement and, as a
developer, a beneficiary of that property. He requested
staff to bring back to the Council, at the earliest time
possible, some recommendations with regard to the
establishment of a non-profit conservancy development
corporation so that the property can be transferred to
those organizations. He suggested the establishment of
a Redevelopment Agency to assist the School District in
building the infrastructure necessary through that
property to accommodate the proposed South Pointe Middle
School, and the development of open space, commercial,
housing or whatever land use is best determined for that
property. There should be a balance between the open
space and development activities so that the acquisition
and maintenance of open space does not become a
hinderance upon the taxpayer of the City. He requested
that these suggestions come back before the Council for
concept discussion.
MPT/Harmony moved to reconsider agenda item 3.2
C/Papen inquired if, under Roberts Rules of order,
MPT/Harmony can call for a motion on an issue that he did
not vote on.
DECEMBER 7, 1993
PAGE 12
CA/Arczynski stated that, under Roberts Rule of Order, a
motion to rescind a previously taken action in its
entirety must be made by someone who voted in the
affirmative on the original motion. However, Council can
direct to place the item on the next agenda for
consideration.
MPT/Harmony expressed concern that the issue was
improperly acted upon by the City Council previously. He
stated that there is an urgency on the matter because a
check in the amount of $5,400 is to be issued tomorrow
unless the matter is dealt with now.
CA/Arczynski, in response to M/Werner, stated that the
Council has the authorization to direct staff to withhold
the warrant, pending reconsideration of the item.
The City Council voted upon the motion made by C/Harmony,
seconded by C/Ansari to rescind and reject the legal
defense agreement in the matter of Gross v. Miller.
Motion failed by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, MPT/Harmony
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Miller, Papen, M/Werner
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None
M/Werner moved, MPT/Harmony seconded to schedule an
emergency meeting on December 14, 1993 to reconsider item
3.2 of the Consent Calendar and to direct staff to
withhold payment until the matter has been resolved.
With the following Roll Call vote, motion carried:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Ansari, MPT/Harmony,
M/Werner
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Papen, Miller
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None
7. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS:
7.1 PLANNING COMMISSION - December 13, 1993 - 7:00
p.m., AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
7.2 TRAFFIC & TRANSPORATION COMMISSION - December 16,
1993 - 6:30 p.m. - AQMD Hearing Room, 21865 E.
Copley Dr.
7.3 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION - December 16, 1993 -
7:00 p.m., Heritage Park Community Center, 2900 S.
Brea Canyon Rd.
7.4 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - December 21, 1993 - 6:00
p.m., AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr.
DECEMBER 7, 1993 PAGE 13
8. NEW BUSINESS:
8.1 RESOLUTION NO. 93-78: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING PLANS
AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF
LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS ON GRAND AVENUE IN SAID CITY
AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO
ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS - C/Papen excused herself
from discussion of this matter.
CM/Belanger reported that the plans and
specifications for the Grand Ave. guardrail
landscape improvements were prepared as directed by
the City Council on June 1, 1993 meeting. He
recommended that the Council approve the plans and
specifications for this project.
Don Schad recommended that indigenous plants be
considered for the landscaping. He offered his
services to assist in that direction.
ICE/Wentz reported that Mr. Schad's comments were
passed on to the design consultants on this
project. The plans and specifications were also
reviewed by the Parks & Recreation Department.
Staff will investigate to assure that Mr. Schad's
comments were appropriately considered in the
specifications.
MPT/Harmony noted that the watering system in the
area is in need of repair.
MPT/Harmony moved, C/Ansari seconded to adopt
Resolution No. 93-78: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING PLANS
AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF
LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS ON GRAND AVENUE IN SAID CITY
AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO
ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS. With the following Roll
Call vote, motion carried:
AYES:
COUNCIL
MEMBERS
- MPT/Harmony, Ansari,
Miller, M/Werner
NOES:
COUNCIL
MEMBERS
- None
ABSTAIN:
COUNCIL
MEMBERS
- Papen
ABSENT:
COUNCIL
MEMBERS
- None
MATTERS WITHDRAWN FROM CONSENT CALENDAR:
3.3 WARRANT REGISTER - M/Werner reported that he,
C/Ansari and CM/Belanger were scheduled to
participate in a team building workshop held by the
League of California Cities.
C/Papen suggested that, since there is only $2,500
DECEMBER 7, 1993 PAGE 14
budgeted for the entire Council for education and
training, it would seem appropriate that each
Council Member be given a $500 limit for spending.
M/Werner indicated that he had not been made aware
of the costs relating to the workshop and withdrew
his request to participate in it.
C/Ansari also withdrew her request to participate
in the workshop.
9. ANNOUNCEMENTS: C/Ansari encouraged the
community to support the Diamond Bar library by donating
their time and money to the facility.
M/Werner welcomed C/Ansari and MPT/Harmony to the City
Council.
10. CLOSED SESSION: M/Werner adjourned the meeting
to Closed Session at 10:15 p.m. for the purpose of
pending litigation, G.C. 54956.9; personnel matters, G.C.
54957.6 or purchase/sale of real property, G.C. 54946.8.
Closed Session adjourned to regular meeting at 10:50 p.m.
M/Werner announced that the City Council, during Closed
Session, moved to terminate legal services with present
counsel, effective immediately. Motion carried by the
following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS - Ansari, MPT/Harmony, Werner
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS - Miller, Papen
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS - None
M/Werner further announced that during Closed Session,
the City Council moved to retain the services of Michael
B. Montgomery, as interim City Attorney, with an RFP to
be sent out at a future date for City Attorney services.
Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS - Ansari, MPT/Harmony,
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS - Miller, Papen
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS - None
C/Papen stated the following reasons for her opposition
to hiring the Interim City Attorney: Mr. Montgomery has
represented plaintiffs against the City in 5 to 9
lawsuits; two Council Members may have a conflict of
interest in voting on the retention of Mr. Montgomery
because he represents them in private matters that may
result in financial gain; Mr. Montgomery has not been a
City attorney since 1980; and the proposal does not
include a fee schedule.
C/Miller expressed concern that the City has hired an
interim City Attorney that has not been interviewed and
DECEMBER 7, 1993 PAGE 15
has not given a fee schedule for his services. He also
expressed concern that many of the decisions made this
evening were predetermined.
MPT/Harmony pointed out that the cases represented by Mr.
Montgomery against the City have proven that he is a good
attorney. He also pointed out that there is no conflict
of interest because he is not suing anyone, nor seeking
damages. He stated that the termination of Mr.
Arczynski's services is a result of a lack of confidence
because of his unique position. This termination creates
an urgency for an attorney to protect the City.
11. ADJOURNMENT: With no further business to
conduct, the meeting was adjourned at 12:35 a.m. to
December 14, 1993 at 7:00 p.m. t
LYN BURGESG, C12' erk
ATTEST: