Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutGraphic Design 2023 RFP Rating.pdfVENDOR PRICE/AGREEMENT TERMS LOCATION TEAM EXPERTISE EXPERIENCE DESIGN STYLE/APPROACH TOTAL COMMENTS RATING %15 10 20 20 35 100 1 1- Techforce Global (India)15 0 0 0 0 15 low rates, out of the country, no relevant experience 2 2- Modish (Michigan)15 0 15 0 10 40 low rates, out of the state, no relevant experience 3 3- Bcreative (unknown)15 0 15 0 25 55 low rates, location unknown, formed March 2023 4 4- Hueman Studio (Rancho Cucamonga)15 10 15 0 25 65 low rates, no relevant experience, good design/style 5 5- Trazo Group (Pasadena)15 7 0 0 0 22 low rates, no relevant experience, poor design/style 6 6- My House of Design (Texas)15 0 20 20 35 90 out of the state but proposes virtual meetings, up to 8 edits at no charge 7 7- Ishkaster (Monrovia)15 10 0 0 7 32 low rates, no details on team experience, samples did not match projects 8 8- Geographics (Riverside)15 7 20 20 35 97 low rates, strong relevant experience, good design, no charge for rush jobs 9 9- Carel Creative (Maryland)15 0 10 0 15 40 low rates, no relevant experience, OK designs 10 10- G&D Associates (Colorado)15 0 7 10 10 42 low rates, some relevant experience (schools) 11 11- Nemoi (Long Beach)15 3 5 5 10 38 proposal does not show expertise, experience not relevant, long lead time 12 12- One Vector Design (Glendora)15 10 5 10 5 45 proposal does not detail approach, no relevant experience 13 13- Byfarr (South Carolina)15 0 10 10 25 60 proposal does not detail approach, no relevant experience 14 14- Pernsteiner (San Francisco)15 0 20 20 15 70 low rates,charges for consults and edits beyond two proofs) 15 15- McGregor Shott (Santa Clarita)15 0 20 20 30 85 design estimate may be extra - not clear 16 16- Simpson Advertising (Santa Fe Springs)15 10 20 20 35 100 current graphics designer, proven track record, extensive expertise/experience 17 17- Soap Studio (Woodland Hills)15 0 15 15 15 60 cost for edits beyond two proofs, rates negotiable, approach not in proposal 18 18- We The Creative (Irvine)10 7 15 15 35 82 does not mention cost for edits 19 19- Green Media Creations (Glendora)10 10 10 7 20 57 expertise not discussed in proposal, experience not relevant, look into video prod. 20 20- Blu Fable 5 7 7 9 20 48 additional costs beyond two proofs, hourly rates not specified 21 21- Cuecamp (Illinois)5 0 10 7 35 57 rec guide cost ($6.5K+), no relevant experience 22 22- Imprint (New York)7 0 5 5 5 22 rec guide cost ($6K+), no relevant experience, style not referenced 23 23- 3fold Communications (Sacramento)5 0 15 10 25 55 good rates for newsletters (5K+ for newsletter), rush fee $500, big projects 24 24- Galaxy Weblinks (Massachusetts)7 0 10 7 5 29 proposal does not detail expertise, experience, approachj 25 25- Tripepi Smith (Irvine)7 7 12 20 15 61 rec guide (5K+), mistakes in proposal, "add-ons" expensive 26 26- Poche Design Studio (Los Angeles)0 10 7 7 15 39 6K upfront admin costs, experience not relevant 27 27- Counterintuity (Burbank)0 3 7 7 15 32 $175 pe hour ,edits past two proofs, lacks relevant experience, flat rate available 28 28- Global Urban Strategies (Alhambra)0 10 7 7 15 39 rec guide (6k), newsletters (hundreds more), expertise not called out 29 29- Formula Marketing (San Diego)0 0 7 7 15 29 rec guide (12K), newsletters 1.6, 1.9K, nice ads, experience not relevant 30 0 31 0 32 0 33 0 34 0 35 0