HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC 2013-17■; ; k • •
I
• •" ' 01 i A r, 1
1. On April 19, 2011, the City Council adopted the 2008-2014 Housing Element
update, which was found to be in compliance with state law by the California
Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) on June 14, 2011.
The Housing Element identifies Diamond Bar's share of the regional housing
need for the 2006-2014 time period as 1,090 units, including 284 very -low
income units, 179 low-income units, 188 moderate -income units, and 439
above -moderate units. Housing need allocations are determined by the
Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) for each jurisdiction in
the six -county SCAG region through a process known as the Regional Housing
Needs Assessment (RHNA).
2. Due to a 2009 annexation adjustment, the City's 2006-2014 regional housing
obligation increased to 1,098 units, with its lower-income (i.e., very -low and low)
share increasing to 466 units. In the 5th Housing Element update cycle for the
2013-2021 planning period, the City has been allocated a need for 1,146 total
units, of which 490 are in the very -low and low income categories. State law
requires the City to demonstrate that it has adequate sites with appropriate
zoning to accommodate development of new housing commensurate with this
RHNA allocation. State law does not mandate that new housing units must be
built, nor require cities to build or finance new housing. The City's legal
obligations are to ensure that zoning is in place such that new housing could be
developed in accordance with the RHNA, and to facilitate the planning and
development process when property owners seek approval for residential
projects that would further the City's progress toward the regional goals
established in the RHNA.
3. State law establishes a "default density" of 30 units per acre as the minimum
density necessary to facilitate the production of lower-income housing. Since
the City does not currently have any land zoned for residential development at
greater than 20 units per acre, state law requires the City to amend its zoning
regulations to allow multi -family development by -right at 30 units per acre for
sites sufficient to accommodate the City's assigned share of regional housing
need.
948324 1
1
4. A finding of Housing Element compliance (referred to as "certification") by HCD
is an important component of maintaining the legal adequacy of the City's
General Plan and zoning regulations. Failure of a city to obtain Housing
Element certification can result in litigation and judicial intervention in local land
use decisions, which have included suspension of cities' zoning and building
permit authority and court -mandated approval of low-income housing
developments.
5. In recognition of the City's objective of obtaining Housing Element certification,
the adopted 2008-2014 Housing Element includes Program 9, which calls for
amendments to the City's General Plan and zoning regulations for sufficient
land to accommodate the City's fair share of regional housing need. The
Housing Element identifies land within the Tres Hermanos property for this
purpose. The Project is located in the portion of Tres Hermanos having the
best freeway access, and is also adjacent to existing residential development, a
high school, roads, and utilities. The timing of development of the selected site
would depend on market forces and the interests of the property owner. No
detailed development plans or schedule are proposed at this time, but any
future actions would be addressed by this EIR and obligated to its mitigation
measures; no subsequent CEQA analysis is anticipated by the City.
6. The project site was previously owned by the Industry Urban Development
Agency. After the statewide dissolution of redevelopment agencies, the
property was transferred to the Successor Agency to the Industry Urban
Development Agency. The Project was initiated solely by the City pursuant to
state law, which requires the City Council to amend the General Plan and
zoning regulations to accommodate additional multi -family housing
commensurate with the City's fair share of regional housing needs.
7. On June 14, 2012, the City's Community Development Department
disseminated a Notice of Preparation (NOP) and Initial Study presenting a
preliminary assessment of the potential impacts of the Affordable Housing Land
Use and Zoning Designation Project. The NOP was circulated for a 30 -day
review period that ended July 17, 2012. The NOP was delivered to the State
Clearinghouse, and posted in the City Clerk's office for 30 days. The City also
conducted a public scoping meeting on June 21, 2012. A copy of the NOP as
well as comments received during the NOP review period are provided in
Appendix A of the Final EIR.
8. As required by CEQA, a Draft EIR (DEIR) was prepared and contained: a) table
of contents or index; b) summary; c) project description; d) environmental
setting; e) significant impacts (direct, indirect, cumulative, growth -inducing and
unavoidable impacts); f) alternatives; g) mitigation measures; and h) irreversible
changes.
9. A Public Notice of Availability (NOA) was prepared for the (DEIR) and the NOA
was placed in the Los Angeles County Clerk's office for 30 days, as required by
Public Resources Code §21092. The City, as Lead Agency, sent a copy of its
NOA to anyone requesting it, per CEQA Guidelines §15087. In addition, public
notice of DEIR availability was posted on- and off-site, and was provided
through publication in a newspaper of general circulation. The City consulted
with and requested comments on the DEIR from responsible and trustee
2
EIR PL2013-227
agencies, and adjacent cities and counties, as required by Public Resources
Code §21104 and §21253. The DEIR was delivered to the State Clearinghouse
for review on May 24, 2013.
10. On July 26, 2013, responses to comments were provided to each public agency
that submitted comments on the DEIR, per CEQA Guidelines §15088.
11. A Final EIR has been prepared per CEQA Guidelines §15132. The Final EIR
includes the DEIR, comments on the DEIR, responses to comments, and
revisions to the DEIR.
12. CEQA contains a "substantive mandate" requiring public agencies to refrain
from approving projects with significant environmental effects if there are
feasible alternatives or mitigation measures" that can substantially lessen or
avoid those effects. CEQA guidelines define the term "feasible" as capable of
being accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable period of time,
taking into account economic, environmental, legal, social, and technological
factors. In accordance therewith, the Planning Commission has determined
that, since the Project, as defined in paragraph 15 below, would result in the
avoidance or substantial reduction of all potentially significant environmental
impacts identified in the Final EIR, the Planning Commission has identified the
Project, as proposed, as the preferred project.
13. The Project includes the approval of the following actions [items (a) through
(d) below are collectively referred to as the "Project"]:
a) Amendments to the General Plan and Development Code to establish a new
RH-30 (High Density Residential -30 units per acre) General Plan Land Use
Designation and Zone District that allows multi -family development at a net
density of 30 units per acre; and
b) Site -Specific General Plan and Zoning Amendments to change the General
Plan Land Use Map and the Zoning District Map to redesignate one of the
two candidate housing sites from Agriculture (AG) to RH-30. The Zoning
Amendment would limit development to 490 housing units within the
selected housing site; and
c) Certification of Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2012061066),
which provides a detailed analysis of potential environmental impacts
associated with the development of Site A or Site B within the 78 --acre
Project Study Area. The Final EIR includes mitigation measures and
alternatives, a MMRP, and identifies Alternative 2 (Infill Sites) as the
environmentally superior alternative, however Alternative 2 would not meet
the basic objectives of the Project in that it would not maintain consistency
with the Housing Element.
14. Notification of the public hearing for the Project was published in the San
Gabriel Valley Tribune and the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers on
August 2, 2013. Public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a
1,000 -foot radius of the parcel on which the zone change is proposed, including
all speakers who have previously attended the scoping meeting or submitted
comments in writing. In addition to the published and mailed notices, the
Project site was posted with two display boards in two locations (Chino Hills
3
EIR PL2013-227
Parkway and Rockbury/Deep Springs Drive), and the notice was posted at
three other designated community posting sites.
15. On August 13, 2013, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public
hearing, solicited testimony from all interested individuals regarding the Final
EIR and the Project.
16. On August 13, 2013, the Planning Commission also considered the Mitigation
Monitoring and Report Program (MMRP) and Findings of Fact for the Project.
After hearing public testimony, the public hearing was closed and the Planning
Commission concluded its deliberations on the Final EIR, the MMRP and the
Findings of Fact.
B. RESOLUTION
NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows:
1. The all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true
and correct.
2. That Environmental Impact Report (EIR) SCH No. 2012061066 has been
prepared according to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) and guidelines promulgated thereunder. The 45 -day public review
period for the EIR began May 24, 2013, and ended July 8, 2013. Furthermore,
the Planning Commission has reviewed the EIR and related documents in
reference to the Project, and on August 13, 2013, the Planning Commission
recommended that the City Council certify the Final EIR referenced herein.
3. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein, the Project constitutes
the only feasible alternative in that none of the other alternatives would rneet
the basic Project objective of maintaining consistency with the Housing Element
of the General Plan. Program 9 of the Housing Element, which has been
reviewed and found by the Department of Housing and Community
Development to be in compliance with state law, includes a commitment to
rezone a parcel or parcels selected from Housing Element Table B-2 to
accommodate the City's share of regional housing need of 490 housing units for
very -low- and low-income households. Failure of the City to rezone a site or
sites listed in Table B-2 and rezoning of an alternate site would result in the
Housing Element becoming non-compliant with state law, therefore, this option
would not accomplish a basic project objective.
4. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein, the standard conditions,
performance standards, and mitigation measures have been incorporated into
the Project, which avoid or substantially lessen significant adverse
environmental impacts identified in Final EIR.
5. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council certify the
Final EIR to be complete and adequate; find that the Final EIR reflects the
independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and adopt the Findings of
Facts and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program attached hereto as
Exhibits A and B and hereby incorporated by reference.
4
EIR PL2013-227
"The Planning Commission Secretary shall:
(a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and
(b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution to the City Council of the
City of Diamond Bar.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13th DAY OF AUGUST 2013, BY THE PLANNING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR.
By:
Steve Nelson, Chai man man
1, Greg Gubman, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Diamond Bar, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of
August, 2013, by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Farago, Lin, Shah, VC/Torng, Chair/Nelson
NOES: Commissioners: None
ABSENT: Commissioners: None
ABSTAIN: Commissioners: None
ATTEST:
Greg Gubman, Secretary
5
EIR PL2013-227
��1 � -.11 Wil
FINDINGS OF FACT
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE
AFFORDABLE HOUSING LAND USE AND ZONING DESIGNATION PROJE
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2012061066 1
Section 21081 and 21O01.5. California Public Resources Code
Sections 15OS1'15OS2.and 15O83.Title 14.Chapter 5.California Code 0fRegulations
1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
1.1 Project Discretionary Actions
The f0l|OVVDg discretionary actions are proposed as part of the Affordable Housing Land Use and
Zoning Designation Project, vVhiohhereafte[Sh8UC0UeotiV8iyb8F8fernedtDoethe"Project":
Creation of New RH-30 General Plan Land Use Designation and Zone District. The Project would
amend the General P|GO Land Use B8DleDt and the Development Code to create o new RH-30 /High
Density Residential -30) district that 8UOVVS Dlu|ti-h3OOi|y development at @ net density Of 30 units per
acre.
Site -Specific General Plan and Zonina Amendments. The General Plan Land Use Map and the
Zoning District Map would be amended to redesignate one Ufthe two candidate housing sites shown
in Final E|R Exhibit 4-2 from Agriculture (AG) to RH-30. The Land Use Element Amendment VvOU|d
limit development to4SO housing units within the selected housing site.
1'2 Project Location and Site Description
The Project Study Area is located in the City OfDiamond Bar ("City"), in the County ofLos Angeles.
The Project GtUdyA[eaiSC000pO3RdOf8pp[VXiOlate\V788CreSUfUDdeVe|Oped|@Ddg8Oe[Gl\y|Oc8ted
along the west side Of Chino Hills Parkway just south of its intersection with [)ionnoDd Ranch
Road/Scenic Ridge O[ive, and south of the SR -60 freeway and Di8DlODd Ranch High GChOn|, as
Sh0VVD in Final EIF< Exhibits 4-1 and 4'2. The Project Study Area is COnOp[iS9d Of G portion of LOS
Angeles County Assessor Parcel Number (4PN):O7O1-22-273.
The Project Study Area under consideration CODSiSt of two separate 8[eaS. referred to as Site A and
Site B. Site A comprises approximately 30 8C[eS and is located irD[n8d|8te|y south of, and abutting,
Diamond Ranch High School with the easterly boundary line extending tOChino Hills Parkway. Site B
comprises approximately 30 acres and is located immediately west Of. and abutting, Diamond Ranch
High School with a portion of the northerly boundary extending to the SR -60 Freeway.
Both Sites are predominantly Vegetated by g[@SS|8DdS. with areas of sage gC[Ub and scattered
VVO0d|@DdS, which are typical Of UOdBVe|Op8d @[88S in the project vicinity, FzrO[DiO8nt [idgB|iOeG cross
or border both sites. There are OO 5t[UStu[eG. major rock outcroppings or other UOiqU8 physical
features VD either site. Land immediately adjacent tOthe south and 8Cr08s Chino Hills Parkway to the
southeast of the Project Sites is undeveloped, Residential neighborhoods are located east of the
Project area a|ODQ Scenic Ridge F<O8d. as well as to the west. Site A and Site B are CUr[8nUy
undeveloped, are used for |iv8StOCh Q[@Zing. and do not contain any sOU[CeS of light and glare.
6
1.3 Environmental Notices
Notice of Preparation. On June 14, 2012, the City's Community Development Department
(Department) executed and disseminated a Notice of Preparation (NOP) and Initial Study presenting a
preliminary assessment of the potential impacts of the project. The NOP was prepared on June 14,
2012, and circulated to the public for a 30 -day review period that ended July 17, 2012. The NOP was
provided to the State Clearinghouse, and posted in the City Clerk's office for 30 days.
Scoping Meeting. The City also conducted a public scoping meeting on June 21, 2012. A copy of the
NOP as well as comments received during the NOP review period are provided in Appendix A of the
Final EIR.
Notice of Availability of the Draft EIR. A Public Notice of Availability (NOA) was prepared for the Draft
EIR ("DEIR") and the NOA was placed in the County Clerk's office for 30 days, as required by Public
Resources Code §21092. The Lead Agency sent a copy of its NOA to anyone requesting it, per
CEQA Guidelines §15087. Additionally, public notice of DEIR availability was posted on- and off-site,
and was provided through publication in a newspaper of general circulation. The City, as Lead
Agency, consulted with and requested comments on the DEIR from responsible and trustee agencies,
and adjacent cities and counties, as required by Public Resources Code §21104 and §21253. The
DEIR was delivered to the State Clearinghouse for review on May 24, 2013.
Responses to Comments on the DEIR. As required by CEQA Guidelines §15088, on July 2013
responses to comments were provided to each public agency that submitted comments on the DEIR.
Proposed Final EIR. The Final EIR or FEIR was posted for public review on the City website on
August 9, 2013. The notices of public hearing for the Planning Commission hearing for the Project
included Notice of the Availability of the Final EIR.
1.4 Project Objectives
The underlying purpose of the Project is to provide adequate sites through appropriate land use and
zoning designations to accommodate future housing growth, as specified in Goal 3 of the City
Housing Element, while providing transportation and circulation improvements that satisfy the City's
level of service standards. Specific project objectives are as follows:
® Amend the General Plan land use and zoning designations prior to October 15, 2013 for one
or more parcels identified in Appendix B, Table B-2 of the City's 2008-2014 Housing Element
to allow single-family and multi -family development at a density of 30 units per acre by -right in
order to accommodate Diamond Bar's very -low- and low-income Regional Housing Needs
Assessment (RHNA) for the 2008-2014 Housing Element planning period. (Program 9,
Housing Element)
® Provide sufficient CEQA analysis for the City Council to select either Site A or Site B as the
designated area to construct 490 housing units by -right without further CEQA review,
consistent with State law. (Govemment Code §65583.2)
® Provide and maintain adequate infrastructure facilities and public services to support
development and planned growth. (Objective 1.1, Public Services and Facilities Element)
® Maintain traffic Level of Service (LOS) standards on streets and intersections, as specified in
the City's Circulation Element. (Circulation Element, Strategy 3.1.1)
® Preserve natural resources on the Project Site and compensate for those natural resources
that would be disturbed by the project. (Vision Statement, Resource Management Element)
7
EIR PL2013-227
EDSU[8 land use CUOlp@tibi|hv between the Project and Oi8DlDOd Ranch High School b}the
north; and nearby residential neighborhoods. (Strategy 2.2.1, Land Use B8OOenU
Facilitate the pnDVi3iOO of emergency secondary access for Diamond Ranch High GCh0o| in
coordination with development Ofthe Project. (Ci[CUl8Li0D BeO0eDt. Strategies 2.2.3 and 2.2.4)
1.5 Description of the Project Examined in the Final EIR
The Project CDDSStS of the City COUDC|'S se|BCUOn of one Of two candidate housing development
sites, each approximately 3Oacres, within 378-@CFeProject EtUdyA[e8.|OCatedinth8OOrthe8st8[88
of the City. Housing Site A is directly VV8St Of Chino Hills Parkway just south Of Di8DlODd FlaDnh Road.
Housing Site B is located northwest Of Housing Site and west of Di@DlODd [{aOCh High School.
Access to either 0fthe two Sites VVOU|d take place via an intersection on Chino Hills Parkway south of
[}i8OOoOd F<aOCh Road. The Project consists of up to 490 multi -family housing UD\tS, to be |OC8bed on
either Site /\0[Site B. The Project also indUdes limited emergency access and utility improvements
to be constructed in the Project Study Area, to serve the site which is ultimately selected for
development,
No development on either candidate site is currently proposed, and the precise configuration of any
fUtU[8 development would be determined through the deVe|0p[n8Ot review process after submittal 0f8
development application by the property OvvO8[ (the SUCCeSSoF Agency to the Industry Urban
Development Agency).
Once the FE|R is certified, its adopted Mitigation Measures will be fully enforceable through permit
conditions, agreements, or other DDe3SU[eS incorporated into the subsequent project design, in
8CC0nd8DCe with 621081.6 of the Public Resources Code. NO further eOVi[ODrnentg| naViSvv through
the {}EC>A process is anticipated at the development review p[OcaSS Stage` consistent with state |8vv.
(California Government Code §05583.2\
1.6 Other Alternatives Examined in the Final E|R
in addition to the Project, as required under Section 15126.8(G) of the State CEC>A Guidelines, the
FE|R examined g Fe@GoD@b)e range of alternatives. AS stipulated therein: "AO E|R need not COO8id8[
every conceivable alternative to 8 project. Rather it must consider FeSSOD@ble range of potentially
feasible 8it8[O8hVHS that will fOSt8[ iDfO[DlHd deCisiODOUoWDg and public participation."
Chapter G of the Final E|R describes the p[OCeSS by which the City determined the [oOQe Of
alternatives to be evaluated. In addition to the "DD project" alternative (Alternative 1). as mandated
under 89otiOD 15126(e) of the State CEQA GUide)ineS, the fo||OVviOg development -oriented
alternatives were also examined therein:
Multiple Infill Sites. K8UUUpka infill Sites in developed areas would have the potential to reduce
impacts such 8Saesthetics and biological resources since they are located iO8Darea that has
previously been developed. This alternative was suggested by interested parties during the
scoping process. This alternative is COOGid8neU environmentally "SUperiOr"tUthe Project, even
though the Project vvOU|d not [eSU|t in any significant impacts. This alternative is evaluated as
Alternative 2.
Tres . This site iSpart 0fthe Tres He0O@nOSproperty, which iSalso owned hv
the SucusSSO[ /\oeDCy to the Industry Urban Development AgeDCy, and is located
epprnXiDl8t8|y 1 Fni|8 south of the Project Study Area. VVhi|8 preliminary analysis indicated that
this alternative could require more extensive infrastructure work because it is not contiguous to
existing development, an alternative location was suggested by interested parties during the
scoping process. This alternative iSevaluated 8aAlternative 3.
8
1.7 Project Applicant
The City is serving in the dual role of both "Applicant" and CEQA "Lead Agency." This dual role is
typical of most public projects and is authorized under CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and
established agency practices. Based on the legal and ethical standards to which governmental
agencies are held, no inherent conflict is established when a public agency serves in that dual role.
The State CEQA Guidelines defines "Applicant" to mean "a person who proposes to carry out a
project which needs a lease, permit, license, certificate, or other entitlement for use or financial
assistance from one or more public agencies when that person applies for the governmental approval
or assistance" (14 CCR 15350). The term "Applicant," as used herein and throughout the project's
environmental review record, is intended to apply to not only the City, as the Lead Agency and the
proponent of the Project, but also to that (those) subsequent holder(s) of real property interests that
will serve as the developer(s) and/or master builder(s) for those uses authorized therein and who may
seek discretionary actions from the Lead Agency and from other responsible agencies for those
development activities, infrastructure improvements, and other actions and programs that may be
authorized under the provisions of the Project, if so adopted.
2.0 INTRODUCTION TO FINDINGS
2.1 Applicable Provisions of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines
Section 21001(d) of the State Public Resources Code (California Environmental Quality Act, or
"CEQA") codifies the important Statewide policy of "ensur[ing] that the long-term protection of the
environment... shall be the guiding criterion in public decisions." In Laurel Heights Improvement Assn.
v. Regents of University of California (1988), the court noted that "[t]he foremost principle under
CEQA is that the Legislature intended the act 'to be interpreted in such manner as to afford the fullest
possible protection to the environment within the reasonable scope of the statutory language."' CEQA
contains a "substantive mandate" requiring public agencies to refrain from approving projects with
significant environmental effects if "there are feasible alternatives or mitigation measures" that can
substantially lessen or avoid those effects (Mountain Lion Foundation v. Fish and Game Commission
[1997]). The State CEQA Guidelines define the term "feasible" as "capable of being accomplished in
a successful manner within a reasonable period of time, taking into account economic, environmental,
legal, social, and technological factors" (14 CCR 15364).
As noted in Table 2.5-1 of the Final EIR, all potential impacts are found to be less than significant, or
would be reduced below the level of significance with the identified mitigation measures as described
in §21081(a)(1) of the CEQA.
2.2 Findings of Fact
Section 21081 of the State Public Resources Code ("CEQA") provides, in part, that "no public agency
shall approve or carry out a project for which an environmental impact report has been certified which
identifies one or more significant effects on the environment that would occur if the project is approved
or carried out unless, among other things, the agency makes one or more of three findings with
respect to each significant effect. This document presents the findings of fact and substantial
evidence that must be made by the City Council, acting in its capacity as the Lead Agency's decision-
making body, prior to determining whether to certify the Final EIR and approve or conditionally
approve the Project.
The possible findings specified in Section 21081(a) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA) and
Section 15091(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines, which shall be supported by substantial evidence in
the record, include:
9
EIR PL2013-227
/1\ Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that 8VOid or
substantially lessen the significant environmental effects, as identified in the Final EIR (Section
21081/@\/1\OfCE[}A; Section 15091(8)(1). State CEC)/\Guide|ineG); and/or
C2\ Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public
agency and not the 8g8DCy making the findings. Such changes have been adopted by such
other agency or can and ShOU|d be adopted by such other 8Q8OCy (Section 21081(8)(2) of
{|E[)A;Section 15OQ1(8)/2\'State CE{}AGUidB|iOeG\;and/or
(3) Specific eCOOOnliC. |8g@l. SOCi8\, teChDV1ogiC8|. or other considerations, including
CODGide[@tioDS for the pnJViSinD of 8Dlp|oVDleDt opportunities for highly trained VVo[k8rS. Ol8k8
iDhS3Sib|e the mitigation rDB8SU[eS or project alternatives identified in the Final E|R (Section
21081 (a)(3) Of CEQA; Section 15091 (a)(3), State CE{3A Guidelines).
With respect to those significant effects that are subject tOfinding (1). the City Sh8|| also adopt 8
program for reporting onn[monitoring the changes which ithas either required inthe Project 0r[nodB
8 condition ofProject 8pp[0vg|tO avoid or |eS8eD significant environmental effects. With respect to
those significant effects that are subject to finding (2), the findings Sh8}| not be Dl8dH if the City has
concurrent jurisdiction with another agency to deal with identified feasible mitigation measures or
alternatives. With respect tOthose significant effects that are subject to finding (3). the findings shall
describe the specific reasons for rejecting identifi8dnniUg8donnle@SUreo8Dda|te[nat}VeS.
In accordance with Section 15091 of the State CEC)A Guidelines, the City {}ouOCi| Dl3heS the h8Fe}O
referenced findings for each significant environmental effect identified in the Final EIR. Those impacts
are categorized under the corresponding topical headings presented in the Final E|R, Reference to
DUDlbe[S assigned to standard conditions, performance standards, and rnitig@UOO measures in these
findings are as presented therein and may differ from those DUnlbe[S or notations SUbSeqVBOUy
assigned bythe Lead Agency should the City's decision-making body elect toapprove Orconditionally
approve the Project, O[s0[neV@rigtiODthe[eDf.
2'3 Custodian and Location of Records
The following iOfO[DlGtiOO is provided in compliance with Section 21081 .6(a)(2) OfCE[)Aand 8eChOO
150S1/e\ofthe State CEC)AGuidelines.
The documents, studies, [epVdS. C0[[eSpOOdeDCe. and other material CODlp[iSiOg the administrative
record for the project are located at the City Of Diamond Ba[ CODlnoUOity Development Department
(21810 {|Op|8y Drive, Second F|OO[. [}i8DlOOd B8[. California 91785-4178) and are, UpOO
appointment, 8V8i|ab|S fh[ review during the regular bUSiDeaS hOU[S of the Department. The Director
of the COOlrnUOity DBV9loprn8Dt Department (Director) is the custodian of record for the project,
3'0 GENERAL FINDINGS
In addition to the specific findings identified herein, the Council hereby finds that:
(1) The {}VUDCi| finds and certifies that the FE|R constitutes G complete, 8cCU[8te' adequate, and
good -faith effort at full diSdnSU[e UOd8[ CEOA.
(2) The COUOCi\ finds and certifies that the FE|R and all 8OvirOODleD18l D0dCeo 8SSOCi8ted
therewith have been CO[np|et8d in compliance with CEQA, the State CEC)AGUid8|inea. and
local guidelines and procedures;
/8\ The Council has independently reviewed and analyzed the FE|R and the FE|R reflects the
independent judgment ofthe Lead Agency's decision-making body;
/4) The COUOCl has neither made any decisions nor taken any actions that would constitute an
' ' i[Ret[8V8b|e commitment Ofresources toward the project prior tOthe certification Ofthe FBR.
nor has the Council previously committed tOa definite course Ofaction with respect thereto O[
with regard to the Use and utilization of the project site;
/5\ Under (�E�{3A. the Qty is the appropriate "lead agency" for the project and, dU[iDQ these
' ' proceedings, no other agency has asserted or contested the City's "lead agency" status;
(G\ In compliance with Section 21092.5(a) Of (�EC}A. at least 10 days prior to the certification of
� � the FE|R. the City provided its written proposed FeSpOnS8S to those public agencies that
submitted CODlD18DtSto the Lead Agency OOthe DE|F{;
/7\ The potential eOVi[OOnOeOta| i0pGCtS of the project have been 8O8lVZed to the extent feasible
Gtthe time Ofcertification Ofthe FEIF{;
/8) Each of the issues to be [eSo/V8d. as identified in the FE|R and/or subsequently raised in
' ' COD101entS received by the City during the deliberations of its advisory and decision-making
bOdieo, have been resolved to the satisfaction of the City COUOoi|;
(�\ Th8(�O�Dc|| [�vieVVedthe comments received on the FE|R, iDc|udiDg, but not |inlitedto, those
' ' Co[DDleOtS received fO||ovViDg the diSSe[DiD8UnD of the DE|R. and the City's responses thereto
and has determined that neither the coO\[neDLS received nor the responses presented add
.'significant new information," as defined under Section 15088.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines,
to the DER
(1O\ The City's 8D8|VSiS of greenhouse gas (GH(�) emissions complies with the requirements Of
` ' CEQA and the State CE{)A Guidelines, inclusive of those changes thereto [8SU|tiOg from the
approval of SB 97. as approved by the Governor on August 24. 2007 and which beC8Dl8
effective 0OMarch 18. 2010;
(11) Copies of all the documents incorporated by reference in the FE�|F| are and have been
` ' available for nBVievv during the regular bU8iOeSS hours of the Qty at the office Of the
Department from the custodian Ufrecords; and
/12\ HgV\Dg received, reviewed, and considered all iDfU[[OatiDOand doCUDl8O[SiDthe record, the
` ' Council has 0[will impose conditions, standards, and mitigation measures and has 0[will take
other [8@3oO8ble 8(tiOOS to reduce the eOVi[OD0eDt@! effects of the project to the Dl3Xi0UOl
extend feasible and Dl8keS the findings stated herein.
5.0 FINDINGS REGARDING THE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF THE AFFORDABLE
HOUSING LAND USE AND ZONING DESIGNATION PROJECT THAT CAN FEASIBLY BE
REDUCED TO BELOW LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
With regards to the Project, the City {}oUOci| has determined that 8XGhOg statutes, n8gu|@tiOOs.
uniform CVdes, project '�Ct eSigD featu[8s, in combination with those CoDditiDDs. StgDd2Pda, and
mitigation measures included in the Final BF< and adopted Or likely to be adopted by the C0UDCi|. will
n88u|t in a substantial reduction of the following eOViPOODleRt@l effects and that each of the following
eDVi[OnDl8Otg| effects will either OCCV[ at Or can be effectively reduced to 8 level that is less than
significant.
5.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases
5.1.1 Environmental Effect: Construction Impacts on Air Quality Emissions.
Th emissions of criteria
///��u'/�
pO||Ut@OtS (mainly fugitive dust and NC)x) from the Project during construction are COOSid8[Hd a
potential significant impact that can be mitigated through feasible COOtrO! Dle8SU[es.
Findinq The City CDUDdl hereby Ulak8S Finding (1). namely: "Changes or alterations have
been required in, or iDCOq}0nated into, the Project that avoid or substantially |eSS8D the
significant environmental 8fhec[S, as identified in the Final BR" (Section 21081(3)(1) ofCEQA;
Section 15091 (a)(1), State CEQA Guidelines).
Facts in Support of Findin : The following facts are presented in support of this finding:
/a\ Project -related and cumulative Air Quality impacts are addressed in 88cdOn 5.3 in the
Final EIR and that analysis is incorporated by reference herein,
(h) Following are the Mitigation yN88SUreG identified in the Final BR which will be
iOCO[po[8t8d into the Affordable Housing Land Use and Zoning Designation Project, to
[8duC8 this impact to 8 level b8|OvV significance:
A{}-1 Prior to 3ppFoV@| of 8 deVB|OpnneOt On the project site the applicant Sh8U
develop and submit tOthe City and the AOKUDaComprehensive Construction
Dust Control Program. The PF0g[a[n components Sh8U include but not be
necessarily limited tOthe following:
o Scheduling — Minimize repeated disturbance of any area and reduce the
time period between disturbance and subsequent construction O[stabilize
any already disturbed areas;
^ High Winds — Cease disturbance operations if dust control is not effective;
* Disturbance Area — Keep disturbance Op8[8dOn3 if dust control is not
effBCtiV��
.
* Dust Control —Utilize dust suppression techniques, including-.
w Water exposed SUrf8Ceo as needed to avoid visible dust leaving the
coDSt[UCtiOO site (typically 3tirDeS/d8y);
n Cover all stockpiles with tarps 8tthe end Ofeach day O[aoneeded;
w Provide VV8te[ spray during \O@d}Og and UD|O8diDg of earthen
[O8teh8|S;
v Minimize in -out traffic from COnstnJCti0D zone;
w Require all trucks to Dl@iOt@iD at least two feet of freeboard and cover
all trucks hauling dirt Vrsand; and
• Sweep 8t[88tS daily if visible soil 08tB[i8| is carried out from the
cODSt[VctiOD site.
m On -Site ROad— P8V8 as SOOO as possible and restrict travel speed to 15
mph prior Lopaving;
* ReveQetaUoO—ReveQetategraded areas oasoon 8opossible; and
* Fencing — Install perimeter fencing with wind screens.
AQ -2 The applicant of any development at the Project site oh8U develop and use
Fe8SOOab|y 8v8U8b|e C0rdro| measures for diesel exhaust emissions.
CODlbUSiiOD 8DliGsi0OS COOt[Ol that Sh8U be applied during CODatnuC[|OO
includes, but isnot limited tOthe following:
v Utilize well -tuned off-road construction equipment;
p Establish 8 preference for C0DtraCLOrG using Tier 3 Or better heavy
construction equipment; and
w Enforce 5 -minute idling limits for both on -road t[UCh8 and off-road
C0not[UCtiOO equipment.
(c) 8iOce. Up0D application of these O0dUg8UOD [n8a8U[8s. none of the threshold criteria
vvOU|d be 8XCeeded, the identified impact vVnU|d be |eSa than significant and no
additional CODdibODG. St8nd8ndS, and/or mitigation nlS8su[8S are recommended or
51,2 The Project's R(]G. N[}.,
CO. S{}~, PK410. and PM25 eOOiSSi0OS during its operation are considered DO[eOtiGUy significant
impacts that can be mitigated through feasible control measures.
12
empu2n13-227
Finding: The City Council hereby makes Finding (1), namely: "Changes or alterations have
been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the
significant environmental effects, as identified in the Final EIR" (Section 21081(a)(1) of CEQA;
Section 15091(a)(1), State CEQA Guidelines).
Facts in Support of Finding: The following facts are presented in support of this finding:
(a) Project -related and cumulative Air Quality impacts are addressed in Section 5.3 in the
Final EIR and that analysis is incorporated by reference herein.
(b) Following are the Mitigation Measures identified in the Final EIR which will be
incorporated into the Project, to reduce this impact to a level below significance:
AQ -3 For any permanent fireplaces or stoves shown in any building plans for
development on the site, only gaseous -fueled devices as specified by the
SCAQMD Rule 445 shall be approved.
(c) Since, upon application of this mitigation measure, none of the threshold criteria would
be exceeded, the identified impact would be less than significant and no additional
conditions, standards, and/or mitigation measures are recommended or required.
5.1.3 Environmental Effect: Exposure of Sensitive Receptors to Pollutants — On -Site. Site A is over
1,000 feet from State Route 60 at its closest point, and this distance is sufficient so that diesel
exhaust from the highway traffic can disperse and does not represent a significant impact.
Because of the proximity of Site B to SR -60 and the associated truck traffic and diesel exhaust
on this highway, the potential exposure of future residents within Site B to the adverse effects
of diesel exhaust is considered a potential significant impact, which can be sufficiently reduced
through mitigation measures.
Finding: The City Council hereby rnakes Finding (1), namely: "Changes or alterations have
been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the
significant environmental effects, as identified in the Final EIR" (Section 21081(a)(1) of CEQA;
Section 15091(a)(1), State CEQA Guidelines).
Facts in Support of Finding. The following facts are presented in support of this finding:
(a) Project -related and cumulative Air Quality impacts are addressed in Section 5.3 in the
Final EIR and that analysis is incorporated by reference herein.
(b) Following are the Mitigation Measures identified in the Final EIR which will be
incorporated into the Project, to reduce this impact to a level below significance:
AQ -4 Prior to final approval of any development within Parcel B, the applicant shall
accomplish one of the following:
A. Demonstrate on a site plan for the development that the nearest
proposed residential location within Parcel B would be greater than 500
feet from the nearest point on State Route 60.
B. In the event that development is proposed within 500 feet of State
Route 60, prepare a health risk assessment in accordance with
SCAQMD and CARB guidelines to evaluate in detail the effect of
exposing residents to diesel exhaust associated with traffic on State
Route 60. If indicated by the results of the health risk assessment,
13
EIR PL2013-227
provide additional measures to reduce exposure, such 8Sthrough the
use Of residential 8i[ filtration SV5teDlG with 3 "MiOi[DU[D Efficiency
Reporting Value" of 12 or higher, and demonstrate through the health
risk osnoSannent that the nneaSUnea will reduce potential exposures
below the level ofsignificance, defined aSfollows.
, MaXinOUrD |OoFe[OeDt8| Cancer Risk > 10 in 1 Dli||iOD;
°
Cancer Burden >0.5 eXCSSS C8DCer case (in 8[e8S >1 in 1
million); and
°
Chronic and Acute Hazard Index >1.O(project iOC[eQOeDU.
/c\ Since, UpOD application of these mitigation 0e8SU[eS, DOOe of the threshold C[deh8
vVoU|d be aXQeeded, the identified impact vVVU|d be laSS than significant and DO
additional conditions, St8ndandS, and/O[ mitigation ol98SUreS are reCOOo[neOd8d or
5.2 Biological Resources
5.2] Environmental Effect: Substantial Adverse Effect on an Endangered or Threatened Species.
Construction of the Project could result in impacts to special status plant species and the loss
of habitat for special status wildlife species observed or expected to occur in the Project area.
The City Council hereby [n8k8S Finding U\. DaDl8|y: "Changes or alterations have
been required in. or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the
significant environmental effects, 8Sidentified iDthe Final BR"(Section 210O1(a)(1\OfCEC)A�
Section 15091 (a)(1), State CEQA Guidelines).
Facts in Support of Finding: The following facts are presented in support of this finding:
/a\ Project—related and CUDlu|8tiwe impacts to Biological Resources are addressed in
Section 5.4 in the Final EIR and that analysis is incorporated by reference herein.
(c) FO|koVVDg are the Mitigation K8e8SU[eS identified in the Final BR which will be
incorporated into the Project, to reduce this impact to a level below significance:
Bio -1 Special Status Species — Protocol surveys shall be conducted for the above -
noted species within suitable habitat GPe3S VO Site /\O[Site BtD determine
pnBS8Oce/@bSeODe of special StgtUS species prior to 8pp[DVa} Of project design
by the City. Subsequent surveys may also be required if development is not
initiated within one year after the last surveys.
If the surveys determine OCCUp8DCy by any of the above -noted Spe[jeS, the
applicant Sh8U be required to COOSUlt with the resource agencies to obtain
permit(S) UDde[ Section of the federal Endangered Species Act and/or a
Section 2081 concurrence from CDF\8/ under the Endangered Species Act. The
ConeU|[@tiDD pFDCeaS ahoU include preparation of g rniUgsdioO p|8D to uvoid,
na|ocote, or minimize impacts. Resource agency approvals for the project shall
be provided to the City prior to the issuance of any grading p8[n0b/S\. The
project applicant shall implement the terms and CODdiUOD8 of the [8SOUn:e
agency permits and associated mitigation plan, aSdefined therein in.
a. U deV8|0pnneDt within Site A or Site B CO[nnn8OCe8 within the bird breeding
season, defined as February 15 to September 1, a preconstruction bird nesting
14
survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist within seven days prior to the
onset of construction activities. The limits of Project disturbance shall be
surveyed for the presence of any active nests (common or special status). If no
active nests are found, no further mitigation would be required. Results of the
surveys shall be provided to the City and the resource agencies (if required).
b. If nesting activity is present, construction shall not commence within the vicinity
of the nest site until nesting activity has ended. Nests found during survey
efforts shall be mapped on construction plans. To protect any nest site, the
following construction restrictions will be required: 1) clearing limits shall be
established a minimum of 300 feet in any direction from any occupied nest, and
2) access and surveying shall be restricted within 200 feet of any occupied
nest. Any encroachment into the buffer areas shall only be allowed if it is
determined by the biological monitor that the proposed activity shall not disturb
the nest occupants.
(c) Since, upon application of these mitigation measures, none of the threshold criteria
would be exceeded, the identified impact would be less than significant and no
additional conditions, standards, and/or mitigation measures are recommended or
required.
5.2.2 Environmental Effect: Substantial Adverse Effect on Riparian Habitat or Other Sensitive
Natural Community Identified in Local or Regional Plans Policies Regulations or by the
CDFW or the USFWS. The Project area includes several CDFW-designated special status
plant communities, namely coastal sage scrub (CSS), southern coast live oak woodland, and
southern willow scrub. These habitats can support a variety of special status plant and wildlife
species and are considered "rare and worthy of consideration." Development of Site A could
result in the loss of up to 6.5 acres of native CSS, an additional 2.5 acres of landscaped CSS,
and 0.9 acre of southern coast live oak. Development of Site B could result in the loss of up to
0.9 acre of native CSS, an additional 2.7 acres of landscaped CSS, 0.5 acre of southern coast
live oak, and 1.6 acres of southern riparian scrub. Impacts on these resources can be reduced
to less than significant with implementation of mitigation measures.
Finding: The City Council hereby makes Finding (1), namely: "Changes or alterations have
been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the
significant environmental effects, as identified in the Final EIR" (Section 21081(a)(1) of CEQA;
Section 15091(a)(1), State CEQA Guidelines).
Facts in Support of Finding: The following facts are presented in support of this finding:
(a) Project -related and cumulative impacts to Biological Resources are addressed in
Section 5.4 in the Final EIR and that analysis is incorporated by reference herein.
(b) Following are the Mitigation Measures identified in the Final EIR which will be
incorporated into the Project, to reduce this impact to a level below significance:
Bio -3 Coastal Sage Scrub — If development encroaches within or adjacent to
established coastal sage scrub habitat areas within Site A or Site B, the project
applicant shall develop a coastal sage scrub mitigation plan. Mitigation shall
include on-site preservation, enhancement, and/or restoration at a 2:1 ratio to
offset temporal loss of existing habitat and ensure no net long-term loss of
habitat values as a result of the project implementation. The coastal sage scrub
mitigation plan shall be approved by the City prior to the issuance of any
grading permit.
15
EIR PL2013-227
The project applicant shall iDlD|eOoe[d the approved DlitioaUOD plan in
accordance with the p|@D'S guidelines and performance standards. The
mitigation p}GO ShGU be prepared in GcCOnd3OQe with FeSOunue agency
guidelines (included in Appendix B)aDd include the fVU0vviDg information:
responsibilities and qualifications of the pe[SODDe| to iDlp|eDl8Ot and supervise
the p|8n. site p|an, site pnap8[8tioD, p|QDiiOg and maintenance p[OCedUFeS.
SchedU|e, and perpetuity preservation /e.g.. conservation easement or deed
Bio -4 Coastal Sage Scrub — Prior to commencement of any grading activities in
areas within Or adjacent to established coastal Sage scrub habitat anaoS.
COnotrU[tiUO limits Sh@U be marked OO grading plans by the construction
SUperViSV[ and G qualified bio|OQ\C8| nloDit0[ The biOiOgiCG| monitor shall verify
earth -moving equipment dons not enter open space areas throughout
construction phases.
Bio -5 [ah Woodland — If the development encroaches within or adjacent to the
established oak woodland present within Site A or Site B. the project applicant
shall develop @O oak woodland mitigation p|8D prepared by 8 licensed 8d]0hSt
with SpeCUiC knowledge regarding Oak tree pneS8rV8tiOO, ne|0c8UOO, and
establishment. Mitigation shall include on-site preservation and/or relocation tV
the extent feasible, and 8 mitigation [epl8C8DleOt ratio Of no |eSS than 3:1 for
each tree removed, as required under the City's TFBe Preservation and
Protection [)[diO@OCe.
The Olitio8UOD o|aO Sh8]| be prepared in 8CCOFdaOce with [eGnu[c8 3g8Ooy
guidelines and include the following information: [eSpOOGibi|Ui8S and
qualifications of the personnel to implement and supervise the p|8O, site p|8n.
site pF8p8ngtiOO, planting and Dl8inteO8DQ8 procedures, schedule, and
perpetuity preservation (i,8.. oonS8rV@t)oO 88Se[n8Dt or deed restriction). The
oak VV0Od|8Od DnitigoUOO p}8D shall be approved by the City prior to the
issuance Of any grading permit. The project applicant shall implement the
mitigation plan as approved bythe City and neaoU[Ce agencies in accordance
with the plan's guidelines and performance standards.
Bio -6 Oak Woodland — Prior to grading, construction limits shall be marked on
grading pi@DS by the n0OStnUcboD SUp8nviSO[ and the licensed arborist and
specify the installation Of physical b8Oi8[S. such as chain |iOh fenCiOg, to
prevent eDcFO3ChDn8Dt bRV0Od the cOOStnJCtiOO limits. The biO|0giC8| Dl0nitO[
Gh3U verify e8Uh-DlOViDg equipment does not enter the 08h Vvnod|8Dd
preservation area throughout construction phases.
Bio -7 Riparian Vegetation — Mitigation for project impacts to riparian vegetation
located within Site AO[Site B ShoU consist of: 1) avoidance or minimization Of
impacts tothe extent feasible, 2\compensation iOthe form Ofon-site expansion
of jurisdictional waters Of the U.G. and the State of California and associated
[ip8[iGO habitat at 3 rDinirnU0 or 2:1 [EdiV within the project's dedicated open
Space 8re8s, and 5\ on-site R*|oc8tiVD of existing mature and healthy oak trees
and/or replacement at 8 OliDiDlUDl 3:1 ratio. Any C0DlpeOS3hOO through
restoration should be on-site, if possible, and in kind.
The nn)tig8iiOD plan shall be prepared in GoCO[d8Dce with the City's Tree
Preservation and Protection Ordinance and F8SOUrCe og8DCy guidelines
(included in Appendix B) and include the following information: responsibilities
and qualifications of the personnel to implement and supervise the p\aD. site
plan, Site preparation, planting and maintenance procedUres. schedule, and
10
smpmu13'xur
perpetuity preservation (i.e., conservation easement or deed restriction). Upon
concept approval by the City, the final plan will be developed with, and
submitted to, the resource agencies as part of the regulatory permit process.
Bio -8 Riparian Vegetation — Additional project -specific requirements may be
determined by the resource agencies, namely the United States Army Corps of
Engineers (Section 404), the Regional Water Quality Control Board (Section
401), the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (Section 1600), and
possibly the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (Section 7). Resource
agency approvals for the project shall be provided to the City prior to the
issuance of a grading permit. The project applicant shall implement the terms
and conditions of the resource agency permits and associated mitigation plan,
as defined therein.
Bio -9 Riparian Vegetation -- Prior to grading near preserved waters and/or riparian
habitat, construction limits shall be marked by the construction supervisor and
the qualified biological monitor, and memorialized on the grading plan. The
construction supervisor shall ensure the installation of physical barriers, such as
chain link fencing, to prevent encroachment beyond the construction limits. The
biological monitor shall verify earth -moving equipment does not enter waters
and/or riparian preservation areas throughout the construction phase.
Bio -10 Invasive Exotic Species - Landscape plans shall be submitted to the City for
review and approval by a qualified biologist to ensure that species proposed do
not include those known to colonize in adjacent open space areas (e.g.,
invasive, exotic plants). Landscaping bordering the open space areas shall
incorporate species native to the project region (e.g., coast live oak, toyon,
lemonade berry, sugar bush) to the extent practicable and shall be consistent
with guidelines of the Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles
County.
Bio -11 Human Activity - To limit the amount of human disturbance on open space
areas on and adjacent to the project area, signage and lighting plans shall be
submitted to the City. Prior to obtaining occupancy permits, signs shall be
installed to discourage human encroachment into the open space and habitat
mitigation areas. Project street lighting in areas adjacent to open space or
habitat areas shall be hooded and directed away from the open space areas to
reduce light spillover.
(c) Since, upon application of these mitigation measures, none of the threshold criteria
would be exceeded, the identified impact would be less than significant and no
additional conditions, standards, and/or mitigation measures are recommended or
required.
5.2.3 Environmental Effect: Substantial Adverse Effect on Federally Protected Wetlands as Defined
By Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Waters of the United States (WoUS) and the state of
California are present with the study area. Impacts to these resources would be substantially
reduced through mitigation measures.
Finding: The City Council hereby makes Finding (1), namely: "Changes or alterations have
been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the
significant environmental effects, as identified in the Final EIR" (Section 21081(a)(1) of CEQA;
Section 15091(a)(1), State CEQA Guidelines).
17
EIR PL2013.227
Finding:Facts in Support of The following facts are presented iDsupport Ofthis finding:
(3) Project -related and CUDlU|@tivS iDlp3CtS to Biological ReGOU[CeS are addressed in
Section 5.4 in the Final EIR and that analysis is incorporated by reference herein.
(b) Following are the Mitigation MeaSU[8S identified in the FlD81 BR which will be
incorporated into the Project, to reduce this impact to a level below significance:
[See Mitigation Measures Bio -5 through Bio -1 1 1
(c) SiDC8. upon 8noiCGtoO of these Dlhig8ti0O nne8SU[es` nOD8 of the threshold criteria
vVOU|d be exceeded, the identified impact VVOu\d be |eSG than significant and no
additional cOOdibOna. St8Ddo[dS. and/or mitigation rne8SUFes are recommended or
required.
5.Z4 Environmental Effect: Conflict with any Local Policies or Ordinances Protecting Biological
Resources. A total of 3.5 acres of southern coast live oak woodland is present within the 78 -
acre project area. Development of Site A could potentially impact up to 0.9 acre of this
woodland, while development of Site B could impact up to 0.5 acre. The City of Diamond Bar
tree ordinance protects native trees greater than eight inches diameter breast height (dbh),
including oak, walnut, sycamore, and willow trees, and requires compensatory mitigation for
their loss. Applicable City requirements include a minimum 3:1 replacement ratio with a
minimum box size of 24 inches. Mitigation Measures Bio -5 through Bio -1 1 also specifically
address potential impacts to native trees. In addition to required compliance with City
regulations, these measures would reduce impacts to a less than significant level.
The City Council hereby D18kSS Finding /1\. namely: "Changes or alterations have
been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the
significant environmental effects, as identified in the Final BR" (Section 21081(8)M\ ofCEC8\;
Section 15091 (a)(1), State CECK\GUide|ineS\.
Facts in Sup ort of Finding: The fV|k}VVng facts are presented in support of this finding:
(G) Project -related and CUDlU|3kiVe impacts to Biological Resources are addressed in
Section 54\Dthe Final BRand that analysis is incorporated by reference herein.
(b) FOUOvviDg are the Mitigation K8e@SUn3a identified in the Final BR which will be
iDo0q}U[@ted into the Project, to reduce this impact to 3 level b8|0VV significance:
[See Mitigation Measures Bio -5 through Bio -1 1 ].
(c) GiOce. upon application of these mitigation [ne8SUreS` DOOe of the Ul[BGhOkj C[beha
VV0V|d be 8xCeHded, the identified impact VVOVld be less than significant and DO
additional CODdit\ODS. St3Dd@njS. and/or mitigation measures are recommended or
required.
5.25 Potential |GtiV9 impacts to sensitiveand/or
special status species and waters of the United States and state, including associated riparian
vegetation, that could result from project implementation would be offset by the expansion of
like habitat within the project's dedicated open space areas as required by project -specific
mitigation measures.
The City COUOCi| hereby OnGkeS Finding (1). OaDlek/- "Changes or alterations have
been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the
significant environmental efedS, as identified in the Final BR" (Section 21081/a\(1) ofCEQA;
S8CdOO 15091 (a)(1), State CEOAGUid8|iOeS}.
Facts in Support of Finding: The following facts are presented in support of this finding:
(0) Project -related and CunOU|8tiVB iDlp8CtS to Bk}|O0kc8| ReSOU[CeS are addressed in
Section 5.4 in the Final EIR and that analysis is incorporated by reference herein.
8d FO|k}VVDg are the Mitigation Measures identified in the Final BR which will be
incorporated into the Project, to reduce this impact to a level below significance:
[See Mitigation Measures Bio -5 through Bio -1 1 ]
/n\ Since, UpOD 8nokcadOO of these Dlitig8dOO mVe@8U[eS. OOme of the threshold criteria
VVUUld be eXceeded, the identified impact vvoU|d be |8SS than OigDihC8Oi and OO
additional conditions, 8t@OderdS. 8Dd/U[ mitigation measures are recommended or
5.3 Cultural Resources
5.31 Environmental Effect: Substantial Adverse Change in the Siqnificance of an Archaeological
There is 8 possibility of cultural resources being located within Site or Site B.
K8UjgatiOO DleaGUFeS vV0uid 8SsUFe that no a(gnUhcoDt @dV8nGe iDlp8Ct3 to 8[Ch8eO|OgiCG|
resources would occur.
The City Council hereby makes Finding (1). namely: "Changes 0alterations 'have
be8n required in, or incorporated into, the p D
��Ct that avoid �[ SUbSt3Dti8|�y |8SG�the
significant environmental effects, as identified in the Final E|R" (Section 21081/@\(1) OfCECA;
Section 15091 (a)(1), State CEQA Guidelines).
Facts in Support of Finding- The following facts are presented in support of this finding:
(8) Project -related and cumulative impacts tocultural Resources are addressed in Section
5.5 in the Final EIR and that analysis is incorporated by reference herein.
(b) FoU0VVDg are the Mitigation Measures kj8Obfed in the FlD8| E|R which will be
incorporated into the Project, to reduce this impact to a level below significance:
CR -1 Prior to the issuance of grading permits for any development OD Site /\ or B. the
project proponent shall prepare and submit to the City for review and approval a
Cu|tV[o| Resources Assessment (Ph8S8 | Assessment) that covers the entirety
of the project Site. The Cultural F{8SoU[CeS /\anessrDeDt shall be prepared by
p8nGOOOe| determined to be qualified by the City. In the event no potential
CU/tU[8| resources are identified within 8[eGS planned for development, no
further studies are required. If the site-specific Cultural Resources Assessment
identifies potential CU|[U[8| [8SoVroea within the @F8@/S\ planned for
development, Mitigation Measure CR-2shall apply.
CR -2 In a[g8S planned for d8V8|OpDl8Ot in which potential CU|tU[8| FeSOU[C8S have
been ident|fied, the project proponent shall submit tothe City for review and
@pp[Ovo| prior tOthe issuance of grading permits g Phase || (e.g., test -level)
CU|tU[@| Resources Report. The Phase || survey shall iOC|Ud8. but shall not be
limited to, the definition Of Site bOUDda[ies, information and analysis On the
3t[UCtU[e. CODt8Ot. D8tWna' depth of SUbSUrf8Ce cultural deposits and featVFes,
and site integrity. This iDfO[Dl8tioO Gh8|| be Used to address the National
19
smpmu,u'2xr
Register of Historic P|8C8S, California Register Of Historic R8SOU[CeS eligibility
requirements for the rBSou[C9 in question, and Ol@k8 recODlrDeOd3tiOO9 as to
the SUd8bi|itv of the resource for listing in either Register. Prior to the iSSU@nCB
of grading pe[ODitS, the project proponent shall pn}Vide evidence acceptable tO
the City that the Dle8SUFeS required to mitigate impacts to any identified CU|tUr@|
resource have been fully satisfied, In the event any identified CV|tu[@| nssoU[Ce
is determined be eligible for |iSdOg in the N@tiODB| Register or California
Regi5te[, Mitigation K8e8au[e {|R-3 shall apply.
{|R-3 If any Cu|tU[@| FGSOU[Ce located within an area planned for deVe|OpOOe[d is
identified as being potentially eligible for listing in either the N@tiOD8| Register or
the California Register, and project designs C@DDOt be altered to avoid
disturbing the resource, G Phase ||i CUhu[8| Resources Assessment Sh8U be
prepared. The SUrV8y oh8U be submitted to the Qty. the appropriate Native
AO08[iCaD Tribe (if 8pp|iCob|e). and the State Historic Preservation {}ffiQ8r
(8HP0) for review and 8ppnDV8|. Prior to the iSSu8DCH of grading p8[Onits, the
project proponent shall provide evidence acceptable to the Qty that the
measures sun3a Pequined by the city, the Stot8. and/or Other authority to mitigate
impacts to 8 National Register or California Register eligible resource have
been fully satisfied.
CR -4 Prior bJthe issuance Ofgrading permits for development ODany site, the project
pnDp0D8O{ ShGU submit evidence tOthe City that G qualified archaeologist (as
determined by the City) has been retained to DlVDito[ ground -disturbing
activities. The project pn]poneOtSha|lSUbn0itt0theCitvfO[PBVievV3Od8ppR}Va|
8 monitoring p|8O that, at @ nliOiDlUnl, establishes the 8n0nUOt` |oc8bOO. and
duration Of 0DOitO[iOg activities; identifies the authority granted to 0oDitO[S to
halt 0rredirect grading operations; and identifies the process to be followed in
the event 8potential Cultural resource isdetected during grading operations. As
determined necessary by the City, the DlODito[iOQ perSOOD8| may include
participant-observer(s) from any Native American entity who has responded to
coD3U|t8tiVO request for the project. Prior to CODlDleDCeDlBOt Of ground -
disturbing 8Ct\Vihen, the project proponent shall further submit evidence tOthe
City that the C0OStFUoti0O contractor has been provided iDfOrOl8bOD regarding
the purpose, need' and authority Of the on-site [noDitOra. as well GS the
practices required to safeguard previously identified or potential CU|Lur8|
resources.
CR -5 Notwithstanding the results of any cukUng| resource 8SS8ssnleO[. in the event
potential cU|tu[8| or archaeological resources are uncovered or discovered
during construction activities within any area planned for development on Site A
Or 0` no further 8XCaV8ti0D or diStU[b8Do8 of the area vVhe[S the [eGVV[ceS were
found Gh8}i occur until 8 qualified GrCh8e0|0QiSt 8V8|U@t8S the find. If the find is
determined to be 8 potentially significant 8[Ch@eO|VgiC@| Or paleontological
PBSOV[Ce, the project applicant Sh8\l. CODSU|t with the City to determine the
appropriate actions as required byPublic Resources Code §21003.2(b). (C) and
(d). As 8pprOpriat8, further assessment via the requirements detailed in
�Mitigation Measures CR -1 through CF{ -7 ah@\| be required. Prior to the
continuation of ground -disturbing activities in the vicinity of the fiOd, the project
applicant shall provide evidence to the City that appropriate D0eGSU[8S have
been taken to fully satisfy applicable cultural [eo0U[Ce protection requirements
established by the City. Gt8te, and/or other applicable regulatory authority.
k� GiOC8. UpOO 8po|iC8toD of these mitigation measures, OODe Ofthe threshold criteria� would be exceeded, the identified impact would be less than significant and no
20
additional conditions, standards, and/or mitigation measures are recommended or
required.
5.3.2 Environmental Effect: Destroy a Significant Paleontological Resource, Site, or Unique
Geologic Feature. There is a possibility of paleontological resources being located within Site
A or Site B. Mitigation measures would assure that no adverse impacts to paleontological
resources would occur. Neither Site A nor Site B contains any unique geologic features.
Finding: The City Council hereby makes Finding (1), namely: "Changes or alterations have
been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the
significant environmental effects, as identified in the Final EIR" (Section 21081(a)(1) of CEQA;
Section 15091(a)(1), State CEQA Guidelines).
Facts in Support of Finding: The following facts are presented in support of this finding:
(a) Project -related and cumulative impacts to Cultural Resources are addressed in Section
5.5 in the Final EIR and that analysis is incorporated by reference herein.
(b) Following are the Mitigation Measures identified in the Final EIR which will be
incorporated into the Project, to reduce this impact to a level below significance:
CR -6 Prior to the issuance of grading permits for development on either Site A or Site
B, a paleontological resource literature search and field survey shall be
conducted by a qualified paleontological investigator. If the survey determines
that this area has no potential for paleontological resources, no further studies
or mitigation are necessary. If the survey determines that the area has the
potential for paleontological resources to be present, then compliance with
Mitigation Measure CR -7 shall be required.
CR -7 Prior to the issuance of any grading permits for development on either Site A or
Site B, the project proponent shall submit to the City for review and approval a
plan or program developed to mitigate impacts in the event paleontological
resources are identified within the area of planned disturbance. This
plan/program shall include, but not be limited to, the following measures:
A qualified paleontological monitor shall be on site during grading and
excavation operations of areas determined to be of high paleontological
sensitivity. The paleontological monitor shall be empowered to halt or
divert equipment temporarily in the event suspected paleontological
resources are encountered. The qualified monitor shall be equipped to
salvage paleontological specimens as they are unearthed to avoid
construction delays.
The paleontological monitor shall be equipped to collect and remove
samples of sediments that are likely to contain the remains of small fossil
mammals. To avoid significant construction delays, these sediments shall
be removed from the area of active grading or off-site for further
investigation.
All recovered paleontological specimens, including small vertebrates
contained in sediment samples, shall be prepared to a point of
identification.
All recovered paleontological specimens shall be identified and curated
at an established museum repository with retrievable storage.
21
EIR PL2013-227
A report that dOCUnl8DtG the findings of the p[og[@Dl Sh8U be prepared.
The report ShoU provide GD itemized inventory Of the recovered
specimens. GUbnniSSiOD of the final report and inventory 8h8U be made to
the City and shall represent completion of the Program to Mitigate
Impacts to Pe|8Onto|OgiCg| Resources.
(c) GiOQe. UpOD application of these mitigation rn88GureS. OOme of the threshold C[deho
VVOu|d be exceeded, the identified impact VVDU|d be |R8S than significant and no
additional CoDditi0OS, St8Dd8ndS, 8Dd/0[ mitigation Dle85UFSS are F8C0[D[OePdBd Or
5.3.9 There is @ possibility that hUDl@D FeD18|OS
could be located within Site A or B. Mitigation Ol88su[8S vvoU)d GssVnB that no significant
adverse impacts toburied human remains would occur.
The City Council henshv [nah8S Finding (1). OG[nek/: "Changes or alterations have
been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially |eSSeD the
significant environmental effects, @Sidentified iDthe Final BR"(Section 21O81(8)(1)ofCE{JA;
Section 15OS1(8)M\.State CEQAGuide|ineS\.
Finding:Facts in Support of The following facts are presented iOsupport Ofthis finding:
(@) Project -related and CUDlV|8tive impacts to CU|tUn8| Resources are addressed in Section
5.5inthe Final E|F{and that analysis is incorporated by reference herein.
(b) F0||OvviDg are the Mitigation Measures identified in the Final EIR which will be
incorporated into the Project, to reduce this impact to o level below significance:
CR -8 In the event hUOlBO [ern8iOS are discovered during gXC8V8tiOO. grading or
COOstDJCdoO activities within Site A or Site B. cOOlp|i@DQe with state |8VV
(Health and 88feh/ Code G7050.5\ vVOU|d be required. These requirements
are imposed OO any construction activity in which human [eDl3iDS are
detected, and include the f0||0vviOg provisions:
There Sh8U be no further 8XcoV8tiOn or disturbance of the Site or any
nearby area F888on8b|y aUSpeCted to OVedi8 8di8Cerd hUnl@D [enn8iOS
until the Los Angeles County Coroner is contacted to determine that no
investigation Of the cause of death is required; and, If the nOn]ne[
determines the remains to be Native American, the Coroner shall contact
the Native American Heritage Commission within 24 hours.
The N/\HC Sh8U identify the p8[5OD or persons itbelieves tO be the most
likely descendant from the deceased Native American.
The most likely descendant may make recommendations tVthe l8Od0vvDer
or the person responsible for the excavation work, for means of treating or
disposing Of. with appropriate digO)ty, the hUOl8D renl8iDS and any
associated grave goods as provided in Public Resources COdD85OS7.S8.
or where the fOUOvViDg conditions OCCU[. the |8OdovVDer or his authorized
representative Sh8U rebury the Native ADleho8n hUnO@n narnaiOG and
@aSOCiGted gngV8 goods with appropriate dignity UD the property in a
|0C@UoD not subject to further and future subsurface disturbance pUrSU8Dt
tOPublic Resources Code 85OS7.98(e).
The NAHC is unable to identify a most likely descendant.
2. The most likely descendant is identified by the NAHC, but fails to
make a recommendation within 48 hours of being granted access to
the site; or
3. The landowner or his authorized representative rejects the
recommendation of the descendant, and mediation by the NAHC
fails to provide measures acceptable to the landowner.
(c) Since, upon application of these mitigation measures, none of the threshold criteria
would be exceeded, the identified impact would be less than significant and no
additional conditions, standards, and/or mitigation measures are recommended or
required.
5.4 Geology, Soils and Mineral Resources
5.4.1 Environmental Effect: Consistent ryyith Applicable Plans and Regulations. Grading and
development of the project could potentially create unstable geological conditions. Compliance
with City standards and mitigation measures would reduce potential impacts below the level of
significance.
Finding: The City Council hereby makes Finding (1), namely: "Changes or alterations have
been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the
significant environmental effects, as identified in the Final EIR" (Section 21081(a)(1) of CEQA;
Section 15091(a)(1), State CEQA Guidelines).
Facts in Support of Finding: The following facts are presented in support of this finding:
(a) Project -related and cumulative impacts to Geology, Soils and Mineral Resources are
addressed in Section 5.6 in the Final EIR and that analysis is incorporated by reference
herein.
(b) Following are the Mitigation Measures identified in the Final EIR which will be
incorporated into the Project, to reduce this impact to a level below significance:
Geo -1 Grading Plan - Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall
submit a Grading Plan to the City for review and approval. The Grading Plan
and specifications shall be prepared and signed by a licensed civil engineer.
The Grading Plan shall show in sufficient clarity the nature and extent of the
provisions of the applicable codes and all relevant laws, ordinances, rules
and regulations. At a minimum, the Grading Plan shall meet the minimum
performance standards identified in this EIR. Specifically, the Grading Plan
shall reflect a preference for landform grading techniques (e.g., contour
grading) rather than mass grading and extensive cut slopes. Also, the
Grading Plan should reflect a preference to balance grading on-site (to the
extent feasible or practical, as determined by the City) for grading associated
with the development area, access roads, internal driveways, and off-site
improvements. Grading plans shall meet California Building Code Appendix
J as adopted in City Municipal Code Section 15.00.310 and amended by
Section 15.00.320.
Geo -2 Construction Management Plan _ Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the
Applicant shall submit a Construction Management Plan to the City for
review and approval. The Construction Management Plan shall contain
sufficient clarity and detail to ensure that soil erosion, fugitive dust, and
23
EIR PL2013-227
siltation will be rn8O@g8d in 8uoondanD8 with the provisions of the applicable
codes and all ne|8VaOt |aVvS. ordinances, nJ|eS and regulations. At 8
[niDiDluDO` the Construction Management P|@O Sh8|| nn8Et the nlininlUrO
performance standards identified iDthis E|R.
G20-3 Hillside Management Plan - Prior to i3oU8DCe Of 8 grading p8[[nit' the
Applicant shall submit aHillside Management Plan tVthe City for review and
approval. The Hillside M8O8g8Dl8Ot P\8O shall deDlOOSt[8t8 compliance with
all hillside deVe\OpnO8Ot SiGnd3FdS regulated by the City's KAUOiCip3| Code
(including Title 22 - Development Code, Article ||| - Site P|8DDiOQ and
GeD8[G| {]eVe|0p[neDt Standards, Chapter 22.22 - Hillside K8@Dag8DleOt).
The Hillside Management Plan shall boconsistent with the recommendations
ofthe approved Geotechnical Report and the approved Grading Plan. /#8
rniDi[Ounl. the Hillside K88DagenneOt P|@D shall meet the [OiniOOU[D
performance standards identified iDthis E|R.
Geo -4 Drainage and Urban Runoff Plan - Prior to issuance of grading permit,
the Applicant shall submit o Drainage and Urban Runoff Plan k}the City for
[8VieVV and approval, The Drainage and [][b8D Runoff P|@D Sh@U
demonstrate that all site runoff is managed in accordance with the provisions
Of the applicable codes and all relevant |oVVG. VnjiD8Dcee. [U|eS. and
[eQU|G1i0DS. At a Olin\[nVnn. the Drainage and Urban Runoff Plan shall [n88t
the [niDinnUn0 performance standards identified in this E|Fl.
Geo -5 Design and construction Of the project Sh3U CODfOrD to the California
Building Code s9\sDliC standards as approved by the City Building and
Safety Division as adopted in the City's K8uOiCip3| Code Section 15.00.310.
Geo -6 Location Ofany earthquake faults ShoU be identified and hShn assessed by
the geotechnical engineer.
Geo -7 All grading and earthwork shall be performed in accordance with the Grading
Ordinances of the City and the applicable recommendations of the approved
Geotechnical Report.
Geo -8 All ea[tivvodh and oJDSt[U[tiVD Sh8U be completed in 8cCDojGDC8 with
mitigation as defined in Public Resources Code §2693/c\ to ensure that
issues Ofpotential liquefaction are addressed.
Geo -9 To address potential soil settlement, minimize potential soil OlOVeDlen[. and
avoid potential damage tostructures, all new building construction shall be
designed and CODStrUCt8d in @CCo[d8nCe with the recommendations of the
approved Geotechnical Report and Grading Plan.
G80 -1O To minimize a0i| 9[OSiOD. all oODS([UCtioO activity shall be conducted in
accordance with the approved Construction Management Plan.
Geo -11 A qualified geotechnical engineer shall be present during all site clearing and
grading operations to test and observe earthwork construction, as
acceptance of earthwork construction is dependent upon compaction and
stability Of the material. The geotechnical engineer Sh3U reject any Dl@teh8|
that does not meet compaction and stability requirements per the
P3CO[nDleDd8tioOs and requirements of the approved Geotechnical Report
and Grading Plan.
Geo -12 All eXC8V3bOnS 3h8U comply with the current OSHA PeqUi[ROReDtS. All cuts
gPaEd8[ than 3 feet in depth should be sloped or shored. T8[npO[8ry
excavations should besloped at1�1(horizontal tovertical) o[flatter, uptO8
24
smpLzo`o-uur
maximum depth of 10 feet. Heavy construction equipment, building
materials, excavated soil, and vehicular traffic should not be allowed within
5 feet of the top (edge) of the excavation. Where sloped excavations are not
feasible due to site constraints, excavations shall require shoring. The design
of the temporary shoring shall take into account lateral pressures exerted by
the adjacent soil, and, where anticipated, surcharge loads due to adjacent
buildings and any construction equipment or traffic expected to operate
alongside the excavation.
Geo -13 Retaining walls shall be constructed according to the structural
recommendations of the approved Geotechnical Report, and in accordance
with other applicable design standards established by the City Building
Official.
(c) Since, upon application of these mitigation measures, none of the threshold criteria
would be exceeded, the identified impact would be less than significant and no
additional conditions, standards, and/or mitigation measures are recommended or
required.
5.4.2 Environmental Effect: Risk of Life and Property Due to Seismic -Induced Hazards. Ground
shaking during earthquakes could expose structures or people to damage or injury.
Compliance with Municipal Code requirements and mitigation measures would substantially
reduce this impact.
Finding: The City Council hereby makes Finding (1), namely: "Changes or alterations have
been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the
significant environmental effects, as identified in the Final EIR" (Section 21081(a)(1) of CEQA;
Section 15091(a)(1), State CEQA Guidelines).
Facts in Support of Findinq: The following facts are presented in support of this finding:
(a) Project -related and cumulative impacts to Geology, Soils and Mineral Resources are
addressed in Section 5.6 in the Final EIR and that analysis is incorporated by reference
herein.
(b) Following are the Mitigation Measures identified in the Final EIR which will be
incorporated into the Project, to reduce this impact to a level below significance:
Geo -14 Emergency and Secondary Access Plan - Prior to approval of the Final
Plan, the Applicant shall submit an Emergency and Secondary Access
Plan (or equivalent Internal Circulation Plan) to the City of Diamond Bar,
the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department and the Consolidated Fire
Protection District of Los Angeles County for review and approval of the
primary and secondary emergency accesses. Primary and secondary
emergency access shall connect to off-site streets to allow residents of the
Project adequate escape routes in case of a geologic event, soil failure or
other major emergency. At a minimum, the Emergency and Secondary
Access Plan shall meet the minimum performance standards identified in
this EIR.
(c) Since, upon application of these mitigation measures, none of the threshold criteria
would be exceeded, the identified impact would be less than significant and no
additional conditions, standards, and/or mitigation measures are recommended or
required.
25
EIR PL2013-227
5.4.3 Environmental Effect: Risk of Life and Property Due. to Non -seismic Soil and Slope Hazards.
Unstable soil conditions could expose structures or people to damage or injury. Compliance
with Municipal Code requirements and mitigation measures would substantially reduce this
The (�KCouncil hR[8bv makes Finding (1). namely: "Changes O[ alterationsh8V�
--
been —din
--'qU\ned in, Or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the
significant environmental effects, as identified in the Final E|R" (Section 21081(a)(1) Of[|EQA;
S8[t\0O 150S1/8\(1). State CEQAGUide|iOeS\.
Finding:Facts in Support of The fnUOvYiDg facts are presented in SUppO[1 of this finding:
/@\ Project -related and cumulative impacts to Geology, GOi|S and Mineral R8sOU[Ce5 are
' � addressed in Section 5.8\Dthe Final E|Rand that analysis is \DCD[po[8ted by reference
herein.
/h\ FO||OVVOg are the KAUUg8tioO Me@SU[eS identified in the Final EIF{ which will be
incorporated into the Project, to reduce this impact to a level below significance:
Geo -15 Positive drainage Sh8\\ be established away from any projectStnJctU[e and
ShoU be OloiDt3iOad throughout the life of the structure. Ponding of xv8te[
Sh8U not be allowed adjacent to any structure. Over -irrigation within
landscaped areas adjacent toany structure shall beavoided.
k� 8iDCH, UpnO application of these mitigation measures, OOme of the threshold criteria` ' vV0U|d be exceeded, the identified iDlpoC[ vVOU|d be |eSS than significant and no
additional conditions, standards, 8Dd/n[ mitigation nne8SUFeS are recommended or
5.5 Hazards and Hazardous Materials
5.5.1 Environmental Effect: Consistency with Applicable Plans and Regulation . Implementation Of
the Project would introduce structures and people to an area that is currently unoccupied and
undeveloped, Future development would be required to demonstrate compliance with adopted
plans, policies, and regulations, including the City's Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan, which
would reduce impacts below the level of significance.
-----Finding:The City Council hereby D8k8S Finding U\. namely: "Changes or alterations have
been required in, Or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the
significant environmental effeCts. GS identified in the Final E|R"/SectiVD 21081/8\(1) OfCEQA
Section 15091(8)U\.State CEQAGUide|iDes\.
Facts in Support of Findin. -. The following facts are presented in Su000d of this finding:
/8\ P �'ectfe|ated and cumulative impacts to Hazards and Hazardous Materials are
` ' addressed in Section 57 in the Final BRand that analysis is incorporated by reference
herein.
(b\ Following one the Mitigation Measures identified in the Final E|R which will bH
` ' incorporated into the Project, to F8dUCe this impact to @ level below significance:
HGz-1 Landscape Plan - Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall
submit a Landscape Plan to the City for review and approval. The Landscape
Plan and specifications shall be prepared and signed by licensed landscape
architect. The Landscape Plan shall show in sufficient clarity the nature and
26
Empmo1u-2or
extent of the provisions of the applicable codes and all [R|eVard /8VvS.
ordinances, nJ|8s' and FegV|atioOg, including the provisions of [}hn Municipal
Code Section 22.24.050 (landscape standards) and Section 22.22.140 UiFe
protection in hillside @ne8\. At 8 DliDiOlUDl. the Landscape Plan shall meet the
DniOiDluDl performance standards identified in this E|R. Specifically, the
Landscape P|8D shall reflect provisions for 8 fire safety buffer Zone and
p[oVi8iORS for the long-term DlGiOteOaDcB of required landscape at the Project
(c) GiD0e. upon 8pD|iC8dUO of these mitigation [Deasu[8S. DONe of the threshold criteria
VvOU|d be eXCeeded. the identified (:Op8Ci YVOU|d be |eSS than significant arid OO
additional onnditiUDS. standards, and/or mitigation measures are [8uODl[Oended or
5.5.2 Environmental Effect: Generate Transport or Exposure to Hazardous Substances. The Phase
I report prepared for the project site found no evidence of previous hazardous conditions.
Mitigation Measures would ensure and reinforce compliance with standard requirements
related to the use and handling of hazard substances during construction.
The City Council hereby makes Finding (1). Oonne|y: "Changes or alterations have
been required in, or iRCO[p0[oted into, the project that avoid or sUbStoOhGUy |8SSeR the
significant environmental efhects, as identified in the Final BR" (Section 21081(8)(1) UfCEQA;
Section 15091 (a)(1), State CEQA Guidelines).
Facts in Support of Findings: The following facts are presented in support of these findings:
(o) Project -related and cuDlu|8hV8 impacts to Hazards and H8z@[dOUS Materials are
addressed in Section 57 in the Final BRand that analysis is incorporated by reference
herein.
(b) FnikzVVOg are the Mitigation K8e8SU[eS identified in the Final BR which will be
incorporated into the Project, to reduce this impact to a level below significance:
Haz-2 Construction Management Plan — Prior to issuance of grading pennb. the
Applicant shall submit Construction K8eD8geDleDt Plan tothe City for review
and approval. The CODSt[uCtiOD M@D@QeDleOt P|@O shall contain SUfUCi8Ot
clarity and detail to ensure that the transport, storage, and use of hazardous
substances, including fu8|S. used during the construction phase will be
DlGD@ged in accordance with the p[oViaiOOS of the applicable codes and all
relevant |8VVS. ordinances, [V|BS. and p8gU|@dOOS. At @ nlininnUnl. the
Construction K8GOag8DleDt P|gD Sh3|| meet the p8rfD[DlaDCe standards
identified in this EIR.
Haz-3 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan — Prior to issuance of o grading
permit, and in cnDlp|i@DD8 with Los Angeles County and ReoiOO8| VV8te[
Quality {|ODtrU| Board r8qUi[80eOtS. the Applicant shall submit a Storm VV8t8[
Pollution P[8VSDtiOn Pi@D (SVVPPP) to the City for [8Vi8VV. The applicant will be
required to submit the SVyPPPt0 the state Water Quality Resources Control
Board for review and approval. A copy of the state permit shall be submitted to
the City prior to issuance Of @ grading permit. The SVVPPFz shall contain
sufficient clarity and detail to 8OSU[8 that the transport, gtO[age. and use Of
hoz8FdOUS SUbatanC8S. including fuels, used during the COnSt[UCtiOO phase will
be managed in accordance with the provisions of the applicable codes and all
relevant |avVo. oPdin8Oo8S. [u|9o. and [8QU|8tiODS. The S\N/PPP shall contain a
contingency program for the containment and management of accidental spills
27
empoo10-ux/
Of any hazardous substance. At 8 DliniDlU[n. the G\8/PPP Sh8U meet the
performance standards identified iDthis E|R.
(o) 8iD0e. Up0O application of these DliUg@tiOO On88SuFeS, DODe of the threshold criteria
vVOU|d be exceeded, the identified i[np8CL vvOU|d be |eSS than significant and no
8ddid0OG| conditions, standards, and/or mitigation 0eaSU[88 are [eC0nnm8Oded Or
5.5.3 Environmental Effect: Risk Due to Natural Hazards. The project is not located in an area
identified by CAL FIRE as being 3 high fire hazard zone. W1UniCip8\ Code F8qUineD18OtS and
mitigation measures would reduce the risk of wildland fire below the level of significance.
The City Council hereby nl8keS Finding (1). D@[De|y: "Changes or alterations have
been required in, or iDCO[p0[8ted into, the project that avoid or SUbSt8Dt)aUy \eS3eO the
SigOiUC@Dt 8DVinJODleDt8| effects, as identified in the Final E|R" (Section 21081/8\(1) Of CE{]A;
Section 15091 (a)(1), State CEQA Guidelines).
Facts in Support of m The following facts are presented iOsupport Ofthis finding:
(a) Project—related and nU0U|Etiv8 impacts to Hazards and Hazardous Ma[eh8|S are
addressed in Section 5,7 in the Final BR and that analysis is incorporated by reference
herein.
(h) FOUoVYDQ are the Mitigation W18GSU[eS identified in the Final E|R which will be
incorporated into the Project, to reduce this impact to a level below significance:
Haz-4 Construction Fina Protection Plan — Prior to isaUaOms of o grading pennUL
the Applicant shall GubOlb 8 CODStnJCtiOD Fina P[OteCt(OD P|8D to the City and
Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County for review and
approval, The Construction Fire Protection P|8D (which can b8acomponent
of the C0OSt[UCti0D KA8D8QeDlent Plan) Sh8|| show in sufficient clarity and
detail provisions for the safe d8or8OC8 of surrounding brush and
storage/removal of CO[nbUatib|8 materials. The Plan Sh@|| also identify
temporary emergency access FOUt8S and notification procedures in the event
of @ fire emergency. The CVDSt[U[ti0D Fire Protection P|@D Sh8|| meet the
OniD\DlUO) performance standards identified in this E|R.
� 8iO�.U�n8/�)C����e�0�g�UDm8�ur�,Oo���B����Q�h@
� would be 8XCeed8d. the identified impact vV0u|d be |eSS than SigOhjC8Dt and DO
additional C0DditiOna, St@nd8Pde. and/or mitigation measures are recommended Or
5.6 Hydrology and Water Quality
5�8.1 Environmental Effect: Alteration of Drainage Patterns, Erosion, Siltation, Local Flooclin and
Surface Water Quality. The project's effects related to drainage, erosion, sedimentation, and
surface water quality are considered a potential significant impact that can be mitigated
through the combination of proper planning and design, construction practices,, site planning
and landscaping, and drainage controls.
The City Council hereby makes Finding U\. D3nlek/: "Changes or alterations have
been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or SUbG18DUaUy |8SeeD the
significant 8nViPDnrDeDt@| effects, as identified in the Final E|R" (Section 21081(a)M\ ofCEQA;
Section 15091 (a)(1), State CEQA Guidelines).
28
Facts in Support of Finding: The following facts are presented in support of this finding:
(a) Project -related and cumulative impacts to Hydrology and Water Quality are addressed
in Section 5.8 in the Final EIR and that analysis is incorporated by reference herein.
(b) Following are the Mitigation Measures identified in the Final EIR which will be
incorporated into the Project, to reduce this impact to a level below significance:
Hyd-1 NPDES Construction General Permit - Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the
applicant shall provide evidence of coverage under SWRCB Order No. 2009-
0009-DWQ, the General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with
Construction and Land Disturbance Activities, or the most current version of
that applicable permit. All applicable components from the Storm Water
Pollution Prevention Plan prepared for the permit shall be incorporated into the
grading plans. All Best Management Practices (BMPs) shall be incorporated
into the grading plans and construction activities, and all equipment or
improvements related to BMPs shall be installed and maintained in accordance
with any relevant manufacturer specifications and good engineering practices.
A copy of the SWPPP will be required to be kept on the Project site during
construction at an easily accessible location so that it can be made available at
the time of an on-site inspection or upon request by a City inspector or other
legal authority.
The applicant will be required to implement such BMPs from commencement of
construction activity until final stabilization of the project site is complete.
Hyd-2 Storm Water Mitigation Plan - Prior to issuance of the first building permit for
the project, the applicant shall submit to the City for review and approval a
Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan (SUSMP). The SUSMP shall
conform to the requirements of the City of Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section
8.12.1695, and requirements of the Los Angeles County Flood Control District.
(c) Since, upon application of these mitigation measures, none of the threshold criteria
would be exceeded, the identified impact would be less than significant and no
additional conditions, standards, and/or mitigation measures are recommended or
required.
5.7 Noise
5.7.1 Environmental Effect: Construction Noise Impacts. Construction activities are expected to
meet the applicable criteria from the City's Municipal Code at the nearby residences to the
southwest of Site B and at the nearest occupied rooms at the high school (daytime short-term
construction noise levels no more than 75 dB(A) on normal work days). However, because the
nearest high school rooms are in temporary buildings that are likely to have less noise
insulation there could be some disruption of classroom activities from construction noise. This
is considered a potential significant impact that can be mitigated with routine construction
noise controls and proper scheduling.
Finding: The City Council hereby makes Finding (1), namely: "Changes or alterations have
been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the
significant environmental effects, as identified in the Final EIR" (Section 21081(a)(1) of CEQA;
Section 15091(a)(1), State CEQA Guidelines).
Facts in Support of Finding: The following facts are presented in support of this finding:
29
EIR PL2013-227
(8) Project -related and cUOOu|stiV8 Noise impacts are addressed in 8eC1iOO 5,10 in the
Final EIR and that analysis is incorporated by reference herein.
(b) FOUOvVDg are the Mhig8bOO Measures identified in the FlO@| E(F{ which will be
incorporated into the Project, to reduce this impact to a level below significance�
N-1 Prior to the iSSU8ODO of grading permit for the project, the 800iiooOt Sh8U
prepare and submit to the City 3 C0OstnJCt)Vn Noise K8idgabOD P)@D in order to
de[OonSt[8[8 compliance with the OUDleho8| Chteh3 in 8BCti0O 22.28.120 of the
K8UOicip8| Code relating to allowable COOst[UCtiOn noise. The p|GD Sh8U address
noise |8Vela during noOSLnUotiOO to the portable C|8S8ron[ns on the CGnnpUs of
Diamond Ranch High GCho0|. as well as noise levels at nearby residential
D[8@8. and identify measures to minimize those noise levels. The COOSt[UCtioD
Noise Mitigation P)@D shall include the fO||0Vving C0DStrUCtioO practices to
[DininliZ8 construction noise levels:
Is All mobile equipment shall have properly operating and maintained
DlUff|eFS;
" GbJokpi|eS of COOotnu(tiOn [n8teh8| or VV8Ste shall be located as far as
possible from existing residences and the Diamond Ranch High School
property;
" W10bi|8 SOU[c8 equipment during the noisiest grading activities Ope[GdDg
VViUliD 300 feet Of the SchOO| Sh8U either occur during SChOO| based
holidays or after students at [}i@nloDd Ranch High 8ChOO| are our for the
day; and
= Stationary equipment such 8Sgenerators ordewatering pumps continually
operating within 500 feet Of any single-family residential home or within
250 feet of any portable o\3oSnDVnn on the Diamond Ranch High School
C8DlpUS Sh@U be equipped with 8 temporary noise barrier as C|OSe as
possible tothe noise source that can reduce noise levels by1O.DdBkA\.
(:) Since, upon application of these mitigation Dl98GUn8S. DOD8 of the threshold criteria
VV0U\d be eXCe8ded, the identified impact VY0U|d be less than SigOihC8Ot and no
oddihOD@| CODditions. Stand3nds, and/or mitigation [ne8oUFee are nsCODlDleOded or
required.
5.7.2 Site /\ is impacted by traffic noise
from Chino Hills ParhVY@V and Site B is impacted by traffic noise from the SR -60 freeway.
Mitigation would reduce these impacts below the level ofsignificance.
The City Council hereby makes Finding U\. namely: "Changes or alterations have
been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially |eSSeO the
SigOiUC8Dt eOViFOOOl8Ot3| effects, as identified in the Final BR" (8eCt\OO 21081 (a)(1) Of CEQA;
Section 15091 (a)(1), State CEQA Guidelines).
Facts in Support of Finding: The following facts are presented in support of this finding:
(G) Project -related and cumulative Noise impacts are addressed in Section 5.10 in the
Final EIR and that analysis is incorporated by reference herein.
(b) FOU0xvng are the Mitigation K88aGUr85 identified in the Final E|F< which will be
incorporated into the Project, to reduce this impact to a level below significance:
30
N-2 This measure applies only to Site A. Prior to approval of a tentative subdivision
map or Development Review for Site A, the applicant shall do one of the
following:
Submit a development site plan that shows all areas within Site A intended
for residential uses are located at a distance equal to or greater than 150
feet from the centerline of Chino Hills Parkway, OR
If development of residential uses is proposed within 150 feet of Chino Hills
Parkway, prepare and submit a detailed analysis of noise reduction
requirements, as specified in Section 22.28.090 of the Municipal Code, in a
manner meeting the approval of the City Engineer. The analysis shall
include updated estimates of outdoor noise levels, and shall identify
measures to reduce outdoor living area noise levels to 65 dB(A) CNEL and
demonstrate that indoor living areas will have noise levels no greater than
40 dB(A) CNEL in accordance with California Building Code 1207.
Measures to achieve these standards may include, but are not limited to:
® Construct a noise wall or berm to shield ground floor living areas from noise;
(not effective for upper stories);
® Situate balconies or patios on the side of the building away from Chino Hills
Parkway such that they are noise protected by the building itself; or,
® Equip patios or balconies having a line of sight to Chino Hills Parkway with
a plexiglass or transparent enclosure or similar noise barrier.
N-3 This measure applies only to Site B. Prior to approval of a tentative subdivision
map or Development Review for Site B, the applicant shall do one of the
following:
Submit a development site plan demonstrating that all areas within Site
B intended for residential uses are located at a distance equal to or
greater than 1,000 feet from the centerline of SR -60, OR
If development of residential uses is proposed within 1,000 feet of SR -
60, prepare a detailed analysis of noise reduction requirements, as
specified in Section 22.28.090 of the Municipal Code, in a manner
meeting the approval of the City Engineer. The analysis shall include
updated estimates of outdoor noise levels, and shall identify measures
to reduce outdoor living area noise levels to 65 dB(A) CNEL and
demonstrate that indoor living areas will have noise levels no greater
than 40 dB(A) CNEL in accordance with California Building Code 1207.
Measures to achieve these standards may include, but are not limited
to:
Construct a noise wall or berm to shield ground floor living areas
from noise; (not effective for upper stories);
Situate balconies or patios on the side of the building away from
SR -60 such that they are noise protected by the building itself; or,
Equip patios or balconies having a line of sight to SR -60 with a
plexiglass or transparent enclosure or similar noise barrier.
(c) Since, upon application of these mitigation measures, none of the threshold criteria
would be exceeded, the identified impact would be less than significant and no
31
EIR PL2013-227
8ddUi0Ds| ConditioDS, standards, and/or mitigation DOeaSU[eS are FeCOrOOl8Oded or
5.8 Public Services and Utilities
5.8.1 Development Of 490
additional housing units would create additional demand for fire protection services, which can
be mitigated to acceptable levels with the measures identified.
The City Council hereby makes Finding namely:). O���� "Changes or alterations h�
—been ----- required i. Or iDCO[pO[8t8d into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the
significant environmental effects, 8Sidentified iDthe Final BR"(Section 21O81(8)M\OfCEQA;
Section 15OS1/a\(1)'State CEQAGUid9UDeS\.
Facts in Support of Finding: The fOUOvVng facts are presented in support of this finding:
(8\ P �'ectfe|8tBd and cumulative impacts to Public Services and Utilities are addressed
` ' in Section 5,12 in the Final E\Rand that analysis is incorporated by reference herein.
/b\ Following are the Mitigation Measures identified in the Final [�|F� which will be
` ' inCO[pO[8tBd into Project, to reduce this impact to 8 |eV8\ below significance:
Pub -1 Construction Fire Protection Plan - Prior to issuance of a grading pennh. the
Applicant shall submit o CnDstnJCtiOD Fire Protection Plan to the City and
Consolidated Fire Protection District Of LOS Angeles County for review and
approval. The Construction Fire Protection Plan (which can be a component of
the Construction Management Plan) shall show in sufficient clarity provisions
for the safe deo[8Dce of surrounding brush and Stor@Qe/[eDOUVm\ Of combustible
materials. The Plan shall also identify temporary emergency access routes and
notification procedures iDthe event Vfafire emergency.
The general CO[d[8CtOr shall be responsible for carrying out provision of the
CODGtnJct\On Fire Protection Plan and D0rnDlUOiCatiOg it to RU subcontractors.
The Construction Fire Protection p\8n should include, but not be limited to, the
following:
� ProC8dU[8e for reporting emergencies to the Consolidated Fire
Protection District of Los Angeles County;
� Pn]cedU[8Sf0[ emergency notification, evacuation, 8Od/0[ [e|OCEdiUD of
all persons inthe building under construction OOthe Project Site;
e P[oc8dU[Ro for hot VV0[k operations, management of hazardous
OO@t8[i8\S and [eDlOV8| Of cODlbUS[ib|e debris and OlaiOteD8OCe Of
emergency access roads;
p
Floor p|3D3 identifying the \0C3tiOOS of 8XitS' exit St8i[S. ex
�t [0�t�S and
portable fire extinguishers;
�
The D8Dle and COOt@Ct phone number of the person(s) FeSpVOSib|8 for
compliance with the Construction Fire Protection Plan;
v
Demonstrate that all construction sites shall be accessible by fire
department apparatus by means of rO@dVV@yS h8ViUQ an all-weather
driving surface of not |SSs than 20 feet of unobstructed width and
engineered tosupport the live load 0ffire apparatus.
w D8nO0OSt[8t8 that o0DSt[U[tiOO vehicles will be parked a rOiDiDlU[n Of 20
feet from new buildings under construction;
32
® Demonstrate that adequate hydrants or interim fire flow water supply is
installed prior to combustible construction materials accumulating on
site;
® Demonstrate that where automatic fire sprinkler systems are required to
be installed in new buildings, the system would be placed in service as
soon possible.
® Provisions for portable fire extinguishers as directed by the LACFPD.
The general contractor shall ensure that an adequate number of
individuals are trained in the proper use of portable fire extinguishers.
® Prohibition of smoking anywhere inside or on the roof of new buildings
under construction.
® Provisions to ensure that all tanks and containers are marked with the
name of the product and "FLAMMABLE -KEEP FIRE AND FLAME
AWAY."
® Demonstrate that wood, cardboard, packing material, form lumber, and
similar combustible debris would not be accumulated within buildings.
® Demonstrate that hot work (i.e., including any work involving operations
capable of initiating fires or explosions, such as cutting, welding,
brazing, soldering, grinding, thermal spraying, thawing pipe, torch
applied roofing, or any other similar activity) and use of equipment
would be in accordance with pre -site inspection, fire watch, and post -
inspection procedures to be defined in the plan.
Pub -2 Operational Fire Management Plan - Prior to issuance of a grading permit,
the Applicant shall submit an Operational Fire Management Plan to the City and
Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County for review and
approval. The Operational Fire Management Plan shall show in sufficient clarity
provisions for the long-term management and maintenance of the project,
including provisions for safe clearance of surrounding brush and
storage/removal of combustible materials. The Plan shall also identify
permanent emergency access routes and notification procedures in the event of
a fire emergency. The Operational Fire Management Plan shall meet the
minimum performance standards identified in this EIR.
The Operational Fire Management Plan should include, but not be limited to,
the following information and measures to reduce safety risks and frequency of
calls to the LACFPD for fire protection and emergency medical service:
Provisions for implementation, maintenance and inspection of all required
fire sprinkler systems.
Provisions for adequate primary and secondary access to the Project,
including security measures, maintenance, and emergency evacuation
planning along such routes.
Identification of emergency exits within the building, stairwells, locations of
fire extinguishers and fire alarms, and provisions for period safety
inspections and maintenance of such facilities.
(c) Since, upon application of these mitigation measures, none of the threshold criteria
would be exceeded, the identified impact would be less than significant and no
additional conditions, standards, and/or mitigation measures are recommended or
required.
5.8.2 Environmental Effect: Increased Demand for Police Protection Services. Development of 490
additional housing units would create additional demand for police protection services, which
can be mitigated to acceptable levels with the measures identified.
33
EIR PL2013-227
The City COUO[jl hereby nl@h8S Finding (1). D8Dle|y: "Changes or alterations have
been required in, or incorporated into. the project that avoid or SUbSt@Oti@Uy |8S8en the
significant environmental effects, as identified in the Final EIR" (Section 21081 (a)(1) of CEQA;
Section 15091 (a)(1), State CE{)A{5uide|iOeS\.
Finding:Facts in Support of The following facts are presented in Support of this finding:
(8) Project -related and CUOlU|atiVe impacts to Public Services and Utilities are @dd[8SS8d
iOSection 5.12 iDthe Final BRand that analysis iGincorporated byreference herein.
(b) FnUOvY\Dg are the Mitigation Measures identified in the Final BR which will be
incorporated into the Project, to reduce this impact to a level below significance:
Pub -3 CPTED—Construction Phase—Phortoinitiationofconatruutionao|ivitiee.
the AopUC8Ot or C0D8trUCtiDD Contractor shall provide o CPTED P\@O
(addressing CODGt[U[tiOO strategies) to the City OfDiamond Bar and the Los
Angeles County Sheriff's Department. The CPTED Construction Strategies
shall outline crime prevention techniques to be implemented throughout the
duration of CODSt[U{tiOD activity at the Project Site(s). Such CPTED
COOGt[uutiOO Strategies shall iOC|Ud8 but are not limited to: 1\ provisions for
cODSL[UCtiVn area fencing; 2) provisions to seCU[8. disable or |Och Up
construction equipment stored at the Project Site(s); and 3) p[VVieioDS for @
security firm to p8t[0| on -Site or S9CUri[y monitoring providing Surv8i||8O:a
during D0n'oonSt[UC1iOP hours to deter criminal activity at the Project Site(s).
Pub -4
CPTEO—P 'eoƒDaai0nmodCJccmp000y—Phortoapprovo|oftheFina|
Plan, the Applicant shall submit a CPTED Strategy Guide that identifies key
techniques for residential uses which deter ChDliDal activity that have been
iDCO[p0[3tBd (0r will be iOCO[pO[8t9d) into the Project design 8Dd/O[ future
Dl8iOteO8DCe. The CPTED Strategy Guide Gh@|| identify along with each
proposed strategy measure the associated program for implementation. For
8x8Oop|8. the CPTED Strategy Guide should identify which Dl8GSurOS vvoU}d
be incorporated into the Landscape Plan that would ensure that the
|8OdSC@pe design provides adequate defensible Sp8C9 surrounding
buildings, Or the CPTED Strategy Guide vvoU|d identify which nnegaUreS
would be Dl8OaQed by the property management UpVD building ooCUp8OCy
(i.e., OlniDteD8DCe Of surveillance equipment and coordination of on-site
p81R]|S). The CPTED Strategy Guide should )DCO[pOr@te techniques similar
or BqUiV3l8Dt to, but not limited to, those identified by through the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development guidelines for single-family
homes and neighborhood development.
/c\ GiOCe. UpOD application of these Dlitig8UOO 08@su[8S, DODe of the threshold criteria
vvoU|d be
exceeded, the identified impact vvOU|d be less than SiQDihC@Dt and no
additional
conditiODS, atond8ndS. end/O[ mitigation measures are nBcODlDleOd8d or
required.
5'9 Traffic and Circulation
5.91 Environmental Effect: Conflicts with Applicable Circulation System Plans and Regulations. The
project would generate an estimated 3,259 vehicular trips per day, including 250 trips during
the AM peak hour and 304 trips during the PM peak hour.
34
Finding: The City Council hereby makes Finding (1), namely: "Changes or alterations have
been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the
significant environmental effects, as identified in the Final EIR" (Section 21081(a)(1) of CEQA;
Section 15091(a)(1), State CEQA Guidelines).
Facts in Support of Finding: The following facts are presented in support of this finding:
(a) Project -related and cumulative Traffic and Circulation impacts are addressed in
Section 5.14 in the Final EIR and that analysis is incorporated by reference herein.
(b) Following are the Mitigation Measures identified in the Final EIR which will be
incorporated into the Project, to reduce this impact to a level below significance:
T-1 The applicant of future development on the Project site shall pay a fair -share of
the improvement costs at the intersection of Phillips Ranch Road at Village
Loop Road. The improvements at this intersection shall include the re -striping
of eastbound shared through/right turn lane as an exclusive right -turn lane.
Improvements will also include the modification of the existing signal to allow for
an eastbound right -turn overlapping phase. The improvement cost at this
intersection is estimated at $8,000 (2012 dollars). The Project fair -share
percentage (based on greatest peak hour, impact) at this impacted intersection
for the Year 2034 Cumulative plus Project traffic conditions totals 14.09%. The
applicant of future development on the Project site shall therefore pay a fair
share of $1,127.20 (2012 dollars) based on the fair share 14.09% contribution.
The applicant of future development on the Project site shall pay said fair share
of $1,127.20 (2012 dollars) prior to issuance of any building permit on the
Project site.
(c) Since, upon application of these mitigation measures, none of the threshold criteria
would be exceeded, the identified impact would be less than significant and no
additional conditions, standards, and/or mitigation measures are recommended or
required.
5.9.2 Environmental Effect: Site Access. The Project would require access from Chino Hills
Parkway. This intersection is currently projected to operate at an acceptable level of service
with an unsignalized intersection. However, future conditions could warrant installation of a
traffic signal based on conditions at the time of development. Adequate line of sight is required
to ensure safe operation of this intersection.
Finding: The City Council hereby makes Finding (1), namely: "Changes or alterations have
been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the
significant environmental effects, as identified in the Final EIR" (Section 21081(a)(1) of CEQA;
Section 15091(a)(1), State CEQA Guidelines).
Facts in Support of Finding: The following facts are presented in support of this finding:
(a) Project -related and cumulative Traffic and Circulation impacts are addressed in Section
5.14 in the Final EIR and that analysis is incorporated by reference herein.
(b) Following are the Mitigation Measures identified in the Final EIR which will be
incorporated into the Project, to reduce this impact to a level below significance:
T-2 Prior to approval and recordation of a final subdivision map or approval of street
improvement plans, a traffic signal warrant analysis shall be prepared by the
Project Applicant in a manner meeting the approval of the City Engineer. If a
35
EIR PL2013-227
signal is determined to be warranted, the Project 8p[l\o8rd ahoshalldesign and
install a signalized intersection prior to issuance of the first certificate of
occupancy for the development.
/c\ GiDo8 upon application of these mitigation measures, none of the threshold criteria` ' would be
be eXCeeded, the identified impact Vv0u|d be |RsS than significant and no
additional conditions, standards, and/or mitigation 0e8SUree are recommended or
Th sight distance\U8�OD
prepared for the Project entrance was based on the criteria and procedures set forth by
b�83 Environmental Effect: Proiect...- 3lysis.
Finding:Caltrans in the State's Highway Design Manual for "Private Road Intersections," The sight
distance evaluation concluded that sight distances would adequate at the Project entrance,
provided that landscaping and/or hardscape to the north and south of the Project driveway,
and within the median on Chino Hills Parkway, are designed such that a driver's clear line of
sight is not obstructed and does not threaten vehicular or pedestrian safety.
The City COuD[j\ he[Rhv makes Finding /1\. O8Oe|\[ "Changes or alterations have
been .required in, O[ incorporated into, the project that ovoid or substantially (BnSeR the
significant environmental effects, as identified inthe Final E|R"(GBCtion 21081 (a)(1) ofCEQA�
Section 15OS1/a\U\.State CE{lAGUidedines\.
Facts in Support of Findi : The following facts are presented insupport ofthis finding:
/8\ Project-relatedaOdCVnnu|eUveT[affioandCiPcU|otioOinnpectsen9addn3osedinS8ction
` ' 5.14 rin the Final EiR and that analysis is incorporated by reference herein.
(h\ Following are the Mitigation Measures identified in the Final E|R which will be
`-' incorporated into the Project, to reduce this impact to o level below significance:
T-3 Prior to approval and recordation ofany final subdivision [n@p or approval of
street improvement plans, o note shall be placed on the map identifying sight
distance standards in a manner meeting the approval of the City Engineer. Prior
to issuance of a grading permit for the proposed development, the applicant
shall demonstrate to the City Engineer that the design and installation of the
project entry [nScto all applicable sight distance safety RaquiFe[OBrkS.
/C\ Since, upon application of these mitigation measures, D0n8 of the threshold criteria
` ' would be
b8 exceeded, the identified impact would be less than significant and no
additional conditions, standards, and/or mitigation nno8sUr8S are [8CnOlnneDded Or
required.
I- _t: Emergency Site..AccessIn [d to ensure public safety in the event Of
5.9.4
an emergency or natural disaster, it is desirable to have a secondary access route for
developments. Diamond Ranch High School is immediately adjacent to both Site A and Site
B, and a secondary access could potentially be provided to serve both the high school and the
Project site.
Finding: The City Council hereby makes Finding (1). namely: "Changes o[alterations have
been required in, o[ incorporated into, the project that ovoid or substantially lessen the
significant environmental affmo1s. 8sidentified in the Final BR"/Section 21081 (a)(1) ofCEJA.
Section 15091 (a)(1), State CEQA Guidelines),
Facts in Support of Findin I- The following facts are presented in support of this finding:
36
(a) Project -related and cumulative Traffic and Circulation impacts are addressed in Section
5.14 in the Final EIR and that analysis is incorporated by reference herein.
(b) Following are the Mitigation Measures identified in the Final EIR which will be
incorporated into the Project, to reduce this impact to a level below significance:
T-4 Prior to approval and recordation of a final subdivision map or issuance of a
grading permit, whichever occurs first, the applicant of future development on
the Project site shall develop and submit a Secondary Site Access Plan to the
City. This plan shall outline and describe an area that shall be utilized in
developing a secondary ingress/egress point onto the Project site. If feasible,
the emergency access shall be coordinated with Pomona Unified School
District and the Successor Agency to the Industry Urban Development Agency
so as to also provide emergency access to Diamond Ranch High School. The
secondary access point shall be gated and only be used in emergency
situations where residents of the Project site need to quickly and safely
evacuate. The Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County and
the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department shall be provided "emergency
access keys" for access to the Project site from said secondary access point in
the event of an emergency.
(c) Since, upon application of these mitigation measures, none of the threshold criteria
would be exceeded, the identified impact would be less than significant and no
additional conditions, standards, and/or mitigation measures are recommended or
required.
5.9.5 Environmental Effect: Hazardous Design Features. The project is required to comply with
design standards to ensure public safety.
Finding: The City Council hereby makes Finding (1), namely: "Changes or alterations have
been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the
significant environmental effects, as identified in the Final EIR" (Section 21081(a)(1) of CEQA;
Section 15091(a)(1), State CEQA Guidelines).
Facts in Support of Finding: The following facts are presented in support of this finding:
(a) Project -related and cumulative Traffic and Circulation impacts are addressed in Section
5.14 in the Final EIR and that analysis is incorporated by reference herein.
(b) Following are the Mitigation Measures identified in the Final EIR which will be
incorporated into the Project, to reduce this impact to a level below significance:
T-5 Prior to the approval of any subdivision map, grading permit or
engineering/encroachment permit, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall
submit a site plan demonstrating compliance with all applicable engineering and
safety standards for streets, pedestrian walkways and bicycle lanes in a
manner meeting the approval of the City Engineer.
(c) Since, upon application of these mitigation measures, none of the threshold criteria
would be exceeded, the identified impact would be less than significant and no
additional conditions, standards, and/or mitigation measures are recommended or
required.
5.9.6 Environmental Effect: Temporary Construction Impacts. During construction, temporary traffic
impacts could occur.
37
EIR PL2013-227
Ft[j----: City Council hereby makes FiOdiOg (1). namely: "Changes or alterations have
been --required i.. or )DC0[po[8ted into, the project that avoid or SUbSt@OtiBUy |eSGeO the
significant environmental effects, as identified in the Final BR" (Section 21081 (a)(1) OfCE[}A;
Section 15O91(8)(1). State CE{}A Guidelines),
Facts ia Support of Findin : The following facts are presented inSupport 0fthis findiOg�
/�\ Project-related and cUnnU|atiVeTraffic and Circulation �p8otS are addressed in GeCLiOO
' � 51/ in the Final E|R and that 8no|yG\s is incorporated by reference herein.
/b\ Following are the Mitigation Measures identified in the Final E|R which will be
' ' iOo0rpO[8tBd into the Affordable Housing Land Use and Zoning Designation Project, to
reduce this impact to a |8Ve\ b9ioVv significance:
T -O Prior t0the issuance 0fagrading permit, the applicant Offuture development On
the Project Site 3hGU submit to the City Engineer 8 CODGtruCbOD Worker Parking
and Equipment Staging Plan that ShoU rniD)nDize the disturbance to the
oU[nDUDdi.g residential neighborhoods and SohOD|S to the greatest extent
feasible. UD|eSS otherwise authorized, contractors and other CVnSt[UCti0D
p8nSOOOe| performing development activities in proximity to the Project site Sh8||
be prohibited from parking and/or Opa[@Ung construction equipment, t[8i|ers,
dVDlp3te[S, or other [n8tH[i3| within 8 public right-of-way or other public
property.
T-7 Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant of future development on
the Project site shall submit to the City Engineer @ {|OD8hDCtioO Traffic
Mitigation Plan. The p|8O shall identify the following:
* The travel and haul routes h}beused bvconstruction vehicles;
m The points Ofingress and egress for all construction vehicles;
m If applicable, t8nnpO[ory street or |8Da Closures, temporary striping, and
temporary signage;
* Location Vfmaterials storage and construction equipment staging areas;
* Maintenance plans tVremove spilled debris from roadway surfaces; and
w The hours during which construction equipment may be used and brought
on/off the Project site.
The applicant Vffuture development OOthe Project site shall keep all ofthe haul
routes clean and free of debris including, but not limited to, did and g[8V8l from
CVDSt[UCtiOD operations. The applicant shall C|e@O @d1@C2D1 St[9e[S and
[O@dvV@ys. per the City, of any material that may have been Spi||8d. b|OVvO. or
tracked onto adjacent streets. Hauling n[construction transportation of heavy
Dl8te[i8| Sh8|| only be allowed between the hours of S:OO a.m. to 3:00 p.m,
Monday through Friday, Un|enS authorized differently by the City. NO hauling or
transport shall be u||OVved during nighttime hOUrg. vVe8keDds. O[StGte/fede[8|
holidays.
T-8 Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant of future development on
the Project site shall deV8|Op and submit t0the City 7r3ffiC Control /98n. This
p|@D shall be CnOSiSt8nt with the Southern California Chapter of the /\Dl8hC8D
Public VVO[ks Association's "Work Area Traffic Control Handbook," the
California Department of Transportation's "Manual of Traffic Controls for
Construction and Maintenance Work Zones", or any alternative reference
38
smpL2o13-2u,
accepted by the City. The plan shall describe the applicant's plans to efficiently
and safely maintain vehicular and non -vehicular access and movement along
local roadways throughout the construction period. The plan shall delineate
detour routes, the hours, duration and frequency of such restrictions, and the
emergency access and safety measures that will be implemented during
closures or restrictions of roadways and lanes.
(c) Since, upon application of these mitigation measures, none of the threshold criteria
would be exceeded, the identified impact would be less than significant and no
additional conditions, standards, and/or mitigation measures are recommended or
required.
6.0 FINDINGS REGARDING THE SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF THE
PROPOSED AFFORDABLE HOUSING LAND USE AND ZONING DESIGNATION
PROJECT THAT CANNOT FEASIBLY BE REDUCED TO BELOW A LEVEL OF
SIGNIFICANCE SHOULD IT BE IMPLEMENTED
With regards to the Project, the City Council has determined that existing statutes, regulations,
uniform codes, project design features, conditions, standards, and mitigation measures included in the
FEIR will result in a substantial reduction of all of those environmental effects identified in the FEIR to
a level that is less than significant.
7.0 FINDINGS REGARDING PROJECT ALTERNATIVES
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that Environmental Impact Reports "...shall
describe a range of reasonable alternatives to the project, or to the location of the project, which
would feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the project but would avoid or substantially lessen
any of the significant effects of the project, and evaluate the comparative merits of the alternatives".
The selection of alternatives and their discussion must "foster informed decision-making and public
participation" (CEQA Guidelines §15126.6(x). Emphasis added).
A fundamental consideration in the selection of alternatives for the Project is the requirement of state
housing law that the City rezone property to accommodate development at least 490 new housing
units at a density of at least 30 units/acre. Because of this legal requirement, no alternative uses of
the site (such as lower -density residential or commercial development) were considered since they
would not meet this fundamental purpose of the project.
As presented in Section 5 above, all potentially significant effects of the Project have been adequately
mitigated to a level below significant. In other words, "changes or alterations have been required in,
or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects,
as identified in the Final EIR" (Section 21081(a)(1) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA); Section
15091(a)(1), State CEQA Guidelines).
7.1 Alternative 1 (No Project)
Alternative 1 (No Project) Description: Under Alternative 1, future use of the site would
continue to be regulated by the existing General Plan land use and zoning regulations.
According to General Plan Land Use Element Figure 1-2., the Project site is designated "PA-
1/SP" (Planning Area 1, Specific Plan Overlay). Strategy 1.6.1 of the Land Use Element (p. I-
16) states that:
"A master plan shall be developed for each area of the City designated as a Planning Area
(PA). The location of each Planning Area is shown on Figure 1-2. Descriptions of each area
and the contemplated land use designations are defined as follows:
39
EIR PL2013-227
8\ Planning Area 1
PA-1iSlocated within the incorporated City south of the Pomona Freeway west of
Chino Hills Parkway. This 72U±acre vacant area ispart Ofthe larger Tres HerDanoS
Ranch property spanning Grand Avenue, including property within the City 0fChino
Hills. PA -1 incorporates the Agriculture (AG) land use designation permitting G|Dg|e
t3DlUy neSid8Dd@\ at a Dl8XiDlUrD density Of 1.0 dwelling unit per 5 gnDSS aC[8S.
Facilities appropriate for this site ShOU|d be designed based upon G vision for the
future and not nne[8\y extend the patterns of the past, Such facilities may include
educational institutions, reservoir for practical and 8eSihet\CG pU[pOS88. C0[ODlerCi3|
developments which are not typical of those found in the area and 8 variety Of
residential, ChUrcheS, institutional and other uses which are complimentary to the
oV8[@|| objective of having a nn3S1er planned area, Development within the Tres
HS[DnaOVS area should be designed so as to be 8 part Of the Diamond Bar
community aSwell 8Scompatible with adjacent |8Dde."
For purposes Of this alternative, 8 30 -acre (gross) portion of the Project site would be
developed with single-family hOOleS at a density of one unit per five gross @cnea' and a total
of six single-family homes.
Finding: For most iSSUeS that are related to the diStU[b8DC8 Of undeveloped }@Od (8.g..
Aesthetics, BiV|OgiC3| ReSOU[ceS) this 8lte[O8Uv8 is superior to the Project, HOVVevB[. for Land
Use and Planning this ahe[O@tiV8 is inferior bBC8US8 it VVOUld not nn8iOt8iD consistency with
regional plans and the City's Housing Element.
g�®rt of Finding
: The fO||0vving facts are presented in support of this finding:
(8) The City's analysis of Project Alternative 1 is presented in Section 6.3.1 in the Final
EIR; this analysis is incorporated by reference herein and summarized below.
/b) AESTHETICS: Under this 8KerO8tive. less grading, landform alteration and disturbance
' � of D8tV[8| vegetation vVnU!d be required in order to aCConnOlOdGte six single-family
h0DleS as C0Olp8[8d to the Project. Th8[efo[e, visual iDlp8[tS resulting from
development VVOu|d be reduced. H0vveVe[. the 8O8|ysiS of the Project concluded that
aesthetics i[np8Cto VVVu\d be less than significant, and therefore the NO Project
alternative would not eliminate or reduce significant impacts Ofthe Project.
(c) AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES: The only agricultural activity onthe
site is livestock grazing, Under this alt8rnEkive, it is 8S8U[ned that the same amount of
|8Od (30 8C[ee) would be [R[nOVed from grazing activity as for the Project. No forestry
resources vVOU|d be impacted by either this alternative Or the Project. TherBfOFe,
iDlpoCtS vvOU\d be similar for this alternative and the Project, and OO significant impacts
would be eliminated V[reduced.
kj\ AIR QUALITY /\N[) GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONAi pollutant emissions are
� � caused during COD5tnJCt\0D and ongoing operations associated with transportation and
other types of energy use by new development. Development under this alternative
VVOUld be expected to generate 8 [8dUoad quantity of air pollutant and gPBeRhOUS8 gas
emissions during construction and op8[oh0D as compared tVthe Project because |eSs
grading vVOu|d be required and fewer vehicle trips Would be generated. No significant
impacts associated with air ennioainna were identified for the Project, and therefore this
alternative would not eliminate or reduce any significant adverse impacts related tothis
topic.
40
() BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Sensitive biological resources are present ODthe Project
site. Under this 8lte[O8bv8, it is assumed that 8 similar 8[OOUDi of |8Od vVoU|d be
disturbed to create roadway access and residential lots for six homes mecompared to
the Project, since VVVne[S of the five -acre p8[C8|S would be permitted to replace natural
vegetation with ornamental |aDdSC8piDg, handSC8pe' etc. ASa Fegult, potential iOlpG[tS
xVOU|d be similar or potentially gne8[8[ than for the Project, which could include
Con101OO areas that encompass sensitive vegetation and [eDl8iR undisturbed. Hovvever,
nlibg8tiOO rDeaSUr8S have been identified that vvoU|d FedUC8 the iDlp8CtS of the Project
below the |eV8| of significance; therefore, no significant impacts VvOu|d be eliminated or
[educed under this alternative.
(f) CULTURAL RESOURCES: Sensitive archaeological or paleontological resources
could exist on the Project site. Under this @1bannaUve, it is 8Seunned that a reduced
amount 0fland would be disturbed to create roadway access and building pads for six
homes as compared to the Project, and as a reeu|t, the potential to disturb cultural
resources would likely be less. H0VVeVe[. mitigation nlB8SU[eS have been identified that
VVOu|d reduce the impacts Of the Project be|OVV the level Of SigOdhC8OCe; therefore, DO
significant impacts would be e|\[niD@t8d or reduced under this alternative.
kz> GEOLOGY AND SOILS: Under this alternative, grading tncreate roadway access and
building pads would be reduced in comparison to the Project, and fewer people and
structures VY0U|d be exposed to hazards Such as earthquakes arid landslides.
However, mitigation measures have been identified that would reduce the iDlp@{tS Of
the Project b8|OVV the level Of significance; therefore, DO significant impacts xvoU|d be
eliminated O[reduced under this alternative.
(h) HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Under the NV Project Alternative, the
Q]OsdnJctiOD period vvnu|d likely be shorter and f8VV8[ people vVoU|d be exposed to
'
potential risks from hazardous materials used in construction. Also, fewer people would
be exposed to vvi|d|aDd fires that could 0CCVr on-site after occupancy. However,
DOidg8tiOD [De@GU[eS have been identified that VYOU|d reduce the inlp8CtS of the Project
below the l8V8| of significance; therefore, OO significant inlp8[tS VVOU|d be eliminated O[
reduced under this alternative.
0 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Under the NoProject Alternative, the future
development "fOOtn[nt"from grading to create roadway access and building pads on
the Project site wOUld be reduced. As @ F8SUlt. required drainage improvements would
also be reduced as compared to the Project. During the public scoping p[OCeSS,
comments were submitted regarding existing drainage problems in the residential
neighborhood located on Scenic Ridge Drive nOdhB@St Of the Project site, arid
concerns were 8Xp[8SSed regarding the potential for the Project to exacerbate the
existing problems. Mitigation 08@SU[eS have been identified to address pOt8OU8|
impacts F8|@ied to d[8iO@Qe from the Project, and impacts would be |8SS than
significant. Therefore, while the NO Project 8|t8FD2tiVe vVoU!d be expected to require
less extensive drainage improvements compared to the Project, it VVoVid not eliminate
or reduce any significant adverse impacts.
0 LAND USE AND PLANNING: The General Plan Land Use Element and zoning
regulations VVOU|d not be 8Dl8Dded under this alternative. C0DSeqU8Ot|y' the Land Use
and Housing Elements of the General P|@O would be internally inconsistent, which
VvUU|d be a ViO|8ti0D of state |8xv. In addition, the City's GeO8[@| Plan would be
inconsistent with regional plans. These land use conflicts VvOUld FBpn8S8Dt a significant
adverse impact. In additioO, this aK8[DadiV8 would not meet the basic project OhiGCtiV8
of accommodating the City's fair share of regional housing needs.
41
(k) NOISE: Noise impacts are generated during construction and from traffic during long-
term operation. This alternative would be expected to nasU|t in reduced noise impacts
as CUDlpaFOd to the Project due to 8 shorter construction period and SUb8taOU8Uy |eSS
traffic added to the road network. However, with the identified mitigation OO83SUFes.
iOnpBCtS of the Project vVOU|d be |8SS than significant; therefore, this G|t8Ol@tiVe VVOU|d
not eliminate orreduce any significant impacts with respect tOnoise.
U\ POPULATION AND HOUSING: This alternative would result in @ reduced inducement
to population growth cOnnpGnad to the Project since it VVoU)d @UDvv only six 8dddiDD8}
homes. HOvveVe[, the impacts Of the Project vVOU|d be |e98 than significant in this
regard; therefore, this alternative would not reduce or eliminate any significant impacts,
Because the Project site is V8CaOt. neither the NO Project G|te[D8tiV8 nor the Project
VVOV|d [eSU|t in diSp|8Cenn8Dt of people or homes. The[9fO[8' this alternative VvOU|d be
identical to the Project with respect tUthis potential impact.
/0\ PUBLIC SERVICES: Under the No Project Alternative, development Of six homes
VVOV\d be o||nvved on the site. Therefore, risks due to police protection, fire or
p3[ann8d|C services vV0u|d be reduced COOnpoR}d to the Project. However, with the
identified mitigation Dl9asU[ea, impacts of the Project vvOu|d be |eGG than significant;
therefore, this alternative would not reduce or eliminate any significant impacts.
/O\ RECREATION: Under the No Project Alternative, demand for parks and [eC[e8ti0D
would be reduced COnOp8[ed to the Project. HOVVCVe[, with the identified mitigation
Dle3SU[BS. iDlp8[tG Of the Project VYOU|d be less than significant; th8Fefo[B, this
alternative would not reduce or eliminate any significant impacts.
(o) TR4NGP{}RAT{[}N/TRAFF}C: i]Od8[ the NO Project A\te[O8tiVe, t[gffiC generation
VVVUld be substantially reduced compared t0the Project. However, with the identified
DliUgGtiVD measures, impacts Of the Project vvOU|d be less than significant; the[8fOFe,
this alternative vvoU|d not reduce or eliminate any significant impacts. Since this
alternative would not provide an opportunity to provide shared B[ner0eOCy access for
Diamond Ranch High School, itiSconsidered inferior tOthe Project iDihiSneQand.
/n\ UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Under the No Project Alternative, deUlaOd for
utilities and public services would be reduced compared b]the Project. However, with
the identified Dlitig@UOO DleaSUr9S, impacts of the Project VVOU|d be |oSS than
significant; therefore, this alternative VV0U\d not reduce or a|iOliD8te any significant
impacts.
7-2 Alternative Locations for the Project
With regard to alternative locations for a project, CECVAGUid8Un8S §15128,6MlC2\ providesthat "The
key qU8StiOO and first step in 8Da|ySiS is whether any of the of the project would be
avoided or substantially |eSa8DSd by putting the project in another location. Only locations that would
avoid or substantially |HSS9D any of the significant effects of the project need be considered for
inclusion iDthe EIR"(Emphasis 8dded).
The eOVin]OOleOt8| @Oa|VsiS presented in Chapter 5 of the Final BR C0ndUde5 that all of the potential
iDlpoCtS Of the Project VVDU|d either be less than significant, or vv0U|d be reduced below the level of
significance by mitigation Dlea8Ur8S identified in the analysis of each topic. Therefore, according to
CE{]A.00analysis Ofalternative site locations isrequired (815128.OU1(2)).However, comments were
received during the public scoping process requesting that the City consider other locations for the
Project, In order to address those public onO0[nentS and cVnne[Do. two 8|t8[O@tiVe |VC8dOOS for the
Project have been eV@|U8t8d and are discussed in Section 0.3 of the Final E|R. These alternative
locations include DlU|tip|8 infill sites in o developed light iDdUSt[i8| portion Of the {}ity, and aDOih8[
location within the Tres Hermanos property approximately one mile south of the ProjectSit8.
42
7.3 Alternative 2 (Infill Sites)
Alternative 2 (Infill Sites) Description: Under this alternative, General Plan and zoning
amendments for separate infill sites listed in Table 6.3-1 below and shown in Exhibit 6-1 would
be adopted to allow development of 490 housing units. These sites are located in the
northwestern portion of the city, north of the SR -60 freeway, and most are currently developed
with light industrial buildings.
Finding: For most issues that are related to disturbance of undeveloped land (e.g., Aesthetics,
Biological Resources) this alternative is superior to the Project because the sites have
previously been disturbed by development. However, for other impacts such as Recreation
and Utilities/Service Systems the impacts of this alternative would be similar to the Project
since both alternatives would generate a similar demand for public services and facilities. This
alternative would be inferior to the Project with respect to Land Use and Planning because it
would not maintain consistency with the Housing Element.
Facts in Support of Finding: The following facts are presented in support of this finding:
(a) The City's analysis of Project Alternative 1 is presented in Section 6.3.2 in the Final
EIR; this analysis is incorporated by reference herein and summarized below.
(b) AESTHETICS: All the parcels included in this alternative are presently developed, and
are surrounded by a fully urbanized area. Some parcels are located adjacent to
residential areas while others are adjacent to similar industrial and/or commercial
development. There are no natural resources remaining or significant aesthetics views
that could be adversely affected by redevelopment of any of the sites for high-density
residential use. No designated historic structures exist within the area. Increased
lighting could occur with redevelopment; however, exterior lighting already exists on
the buildings on these sites, and the City Municipal Code contains provisions to
minimize potential impacts of increased lighting on any adjacent sensitive uses.
While this alternative would avoid the conversion of vacant land to urban uses, the
impacts of the Project would be less than significant; therefore, this alternative would
not eliminate or reduce any significant adverse impacts with regard to aesthetics.
(c) AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES: No agriculture or forestry resources
would be affected under this alternative, and therefore, impacts would be less than for
the Project. However, no significant impacts to agriculture and forestry resources were
identified for the Project; therefore, this alternative would not eliminate or reduce any
significant adverse impacts related to this topic.
(d) AIR QUALITY AND GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS: Air pollutant emissions are
caused during construction and ongoing operations associated with transportation and
other types of energy use by new development. While development under this
alternative would be expected to generate a similar quantity of air pollutant and
greenhouse gas emissions during construction and operation as the Project, existing
uses on these sites already generate air pollutants; therefore, the net change in
emissions would be less than for the Project. However, no significant impacts
associated with air emissions were identified for the Project; therefore, this alternative
would not eliminate or reduce any significant adverse impacts related to this topic.
(e) BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: All parcels included in this Alternative are currently
developed, and are surrounded by urban uses. There are no natural resources
remaining on these sites. Subsequent redevelopment of these sites for high-density
residential use would have reduced potential to cause biological impacts.
43
EIR PL2013-227
While the Project could DVtenh8Uyimpact biological [eS0urCeS, the identified OlhjgohOO
measures would reduce impacts to a level that is less than significant. Therefore, while
this 8|te[D8tiV8 vvOU|d be superior to the Project with [9Gp8{t to biological FeSVUFCeS, it
vVOu|d not eliminate or reduce any significant impacts in this regard.
Ul CULTURAL RESOURCES: All the parcels included iDthis Alternative are presently
developed, and are surrounded by urbanized area. CDOS8qUSDt|y. any archaeological
resources that may have existed would likely have been eliminated during construction
Of the existing uses. Sub -surface p8)eOntO|OgiC8| [eS0U[Cos C0U|d potentially exist in
this area; therefore, redevelopment Ofthese sites could impact cultural r8a0U[Cea,
With the identified nOidg8tiOD OO88SU[es. the Project VYOu|d not [8Su|t in significant
impacts to oU|tU[@| reSOU[o8s; the[efore, this alternative xvOU|d not e|\[niDote or reduce
any significant impacts in this regard.
/g\ GEOLOGY AND SOILS: Under the |Dfi|| Sites A|i8rnaUV8, future development Vv0u|d
occur within o previously developed area. Because this alternative is |OC8t9d on land
that is relatively flat, previously urbanized and oCC8SSib|8 by an existing [oedvv8y
DetvVOFk, potential i[Dp@CtS related to Q80|OgV and soils vvoU|d be reduced in
c0Dlpa[iSOD to those anticipated with the Project. BeC8US8 the |Ofi|( Sites are not
located in 8 hillside area, there would be no need for Hillside Management P|8D and
hillside, slope stability and landslide concerns would not be anticipated.
Mitigation [ne8SU[8S have been identified that would |UdUCe potential iOlp8otS of the
Project with regard to geology and 80i|S to 8 level that is |eSS than significant.
Therefore, m/hi|8 this alternative vV0U|d be expected to result in reduced pnteOtial
g8O|ogiC@> impacts as compared to the Project Site. it would not eliminate or reduce any
significant adverse impacts.
/h\ HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: While this alternative would be expected
to result in reduced potential risk for some natural/manmade hazards (such as wildfires
or |8DdSUdeS\, the p0[8OhG| hSh for other hazards (such as eXp0SUPe to hazardous
substances) vVoU|d be increased as cODlp3[8d to the Project. With the identified
mitigation DlSasUnSS, potential innp@CtS Of the Project would be |eSS than S)gDd5c8Dt;
therefore, this alternative VvVU|d not 8|iOniO8te or reduce any significant adverse
0 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: Under the Infill Sites Altern8hV8, future
development would occur within 8 previously developed area in the northwest area of
the Qty. Because this alternative is located in 8 developed area, existing drainage
facilities would be expected to serve the new residential development, and therefore
required d[8iO8g8 improvements would be reduced as compared tothe Project site.
During the pUb|\C scoping pnDCesS. CoDlDleDtG were aUb[Od±ed P8g3KJiOg existing
drainage p[0b\enlS in the n8SideOh8| neighborhood located On GCeOiC Ridge Drive
northeast Of the Project site. Mitigation 0e3SU[8S have been identified to address
potential impacts related to d[8iDoQe from the Project, and impacts VVOU|d be |eSS than
significant. Therefore, while this alternative would be expected to require |8SS extensive
drainage \nnproVenneDtS compared to the P[0jnCt. it would not eliminate or reduce any
significant adverse impacts.
U)
LAND USE AND PLANNING: CEQA defines |8Dd use and planning iOlp8otS as the
-
physical division Of an established community; conflict with any applicable land use
p|8D, poUCV. or F8QU|8tion of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but
not |inld8d to. the General P|8O, Specific P|oD. |oo8| coastal pn]g[8[D, or zoning
ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect;
8Od/O[ conflict with any applicable habitat conservation p|8O Or n3tUF8| oon0n0UDity
conservation plan.
44
smpoo1n-z2r
All of the parcels included in this alternative have been previously developed, and are
surrounded by urbanized area. The General Plan Land Use Element designates all of
these parcels for Light Industrial use, with the exception of a small parcel located
adjacent to the SR -60 Freeway at Brea Canyon Road which is designated for
Professional Office (OP) use. Surrounding adjacent areas are developed with
residential uses varying from 5 to 20 dwelling units per acre.
With regard to physical division of an established community, no significant impacts
were identified for the Project and this alternative would similarly have no significant
impacts. Neither this alternative nor the Project would result in significant conflicts with
land use plans or policies, and neither area is within an area covered by a habitat
conservation plan. Therefore, impacts for this alternative would be similar to the
Project.
(k) NOISE: Noise impacts are generated during construction and during long-term
operation. Selection of this alternative site would be expected to result in similar noise
impacts as compared to the Project because a similar amount of construction would
occur and a similar volume of traffic would be generated. However, some of the sites
are immediately adjacent to the SR -60 freeway, and would be exposed to a higher
level of traffic noise compared to the Project site. With the identified mitigation
measures, the impacts of the Project would be less than significant, and this alternative
would not eliminate or reduce any significant impacts with respect to noise.
(1) POPULATION AND HOUSING: Potential impacts with regard to population and
housing include inducement of population growth or displacement of people or homes.
This alternative would result in a similar inducement to population growth as the Project
since both would allow up to 490 additional homes. Neither this alternative nor the
Project would result in displacement of people or homes, and therefore impacts would
be similar.
(m) PUBLIC SERVICES: As with the Project, it is anticipated that any new development of
the Infill Sites would be required to comply with existing regulations to ensure adequate
emergency access, construction in compliance with fire safety and building codes,
provisions for adequate fire flow and hydrant access.
With the identified mitigation measures, the impacts of the Project would be less than
significant, and this alternative would not eliminate or reduce any significant impacts
with respect to fire and police protection.
(n) RECREATION: All residential development must provide for dedication of parkland or
pay in -lieu fees in accordance with Section 21.32 of the City's Subdivision Code. No
significant impacts to recreation were identified in association with the Project, and
anticipated impacts related to this alternative would be similar to the Project.
(o) TRANSPORATION/TRAFFIC: The Traffic Impact Analysis prepared for the Project
identified one intersection (Phillips Ranch Road at Village Loop Road) where
potentially significant impacts would require mitigation to conform to adopted level of
service standards. Due to the greater distance between the Infill Sites Alternative and
that affected intersection, it is less likely that this impact would occur; however, impacts
could occur at other intersections closer to the Infill Sites.
The amount of vehicular traffic generated would be the same for this alternative as
compared to the Project since the same number of new housing units would be
anticipated. However, since new housing at the Infill Sites would replace existing
industrial uses, the net increase in traffic would likely be less than the Project, since it
is a vacant site. However, since mitigation measures have been identified that would
45
EIR PL2013-227
reduce iDlp8CtS of the Project to 8 |8SS than SigDd5msrd |eVe|. the Infill Sites Alternative
Vv0u\d not eliminate orreduce any significant impacts.
(p\ UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: The Project Gndthe Infill Sites /\�e[O8tivevV0U|d
` '
generate similar demand for public Sen/iCeS and utilities since both would result in
d8VH|opOnoDt of 480 additional PeSidRDd8! units. Since the Infill Sites are CU[FeDt|y
served by Uti|itieS, it is expected that infrastructure improvements would be less than
for the Project 8Ct Sit8; hOVVeV8[. upgrading of water or wastewater[ lines could be
necessary tserve high-density F8Sid8Oti@| development. NO SigDUjc@D[ impacts have
been identified for the Project and therefore this alternative VVOUld not eliminate or
reduce any significant impacts in regard to utilities and service systems.
Alternative 3 (Tres Hermanos - South) Description: This Keatisite is located west of
Chino Hills Parkway near the intersection of Chino Avenue, approximately one mile south of
the Project site. The site is part of the Tres Hermanos property owned by the Successor
Agency to the Industry Urban Development Agency. Similar to the Project Site, the Tres
Hermanos South Site is characterized as gently rolling terrain with distinct hills and valleys.
However, this location includes a portion of the ranch that is within a broad valley with less
topographical relief as compared to the Project Site.
During the scoping pFOCeSS. public CoDlOn8Ot8 were received requesting that alternate
|oCatOOe be considered for the Project. Along with the Infill Sites Alternative, this alternative
responds to those public ConnO0eOte and addresses CEQA requirements to C0nS\d8r
alternatives that might achieve most of the project objectives while reducing or eliminating
significant eOvinDnnl9nt8| impacts. This Site is more than 30 3Cr8S in Size and COU\d
3CCOnODlVd3te the project objective of 490 residential units.
Finding:F0[OlOStiSsUeS. Alternative 3 (Tres HH[OD8DOS-8OUth)VV0U(d have similar impacts tO
Ct HoVV�V8[ 8S with �h8 other alternatives, it would not maintain consistency with the
the Project. ` .
Housing Element and therefore would not meet 3basic project obieCtiVe.
Facts in Support of findjog: The following facts are presented in support of this finding:
(a) The Lead Agency's 8OolyGin of Project Alternative 1 is presented in Section 63.3 in the
Final EIR; this analysis is incorporated by reference herein and summarized below.
(N AESTHETICS: this site has rolling topography and sparse natural vegetation 8\0Og
` ' Chino HU|S Parkway in 8[e8S visible to i[DOledi8h8|y sU[n}UDdiOg undeveloped 8Fe8S.
The site is not immediately adjacent to development but may be visible in the distance
from sU[TOUDdiDg 8Fe8S. In that [8spect, view iDlp8Cta VVoU|d be COOSide[8d o\Dli|8[ to
the Project site.
NO significant �
aeSth�cS innpoCtawere identified relative hnthe Prokect, and therefore
this alternative vVOU|d not eliminate or reduce any significant i[np8CtS with [8goPU to
aesthetics.
/c\ AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES: This alternative would have similar` ' impacts to grazing |8Od as the Project. HOVVeVe[. D0significant impacts t0 aQhCUMU[e
and forestry r8SoUPCBS were identified for the Project, and therefore this 8|teOl8t\V8
vvoU|d not eliminate or reduce any significant 8dV8[oe inlpootS related tOthis topic.
/d\ AIR QUALITY AND GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS: Ai[ Pollutant emissions are
` ' caused during construction and ongoing operations associated with transportation and
other types of energy use by new development. Development under this alternative
vvoU|d be expected to generate 8 similar quantity of air pollutant and greenhouse gas
erniSaiODs during construction and operation as the Project. NO significant impacts
46
associated with air emissions were identified for the Project, and therefore this
alternative would not eliminate or reduce any significant adverse impacts related to this
topic.
(e) BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: No field surveys have been conducted on this alternative
site; however, site photographs and aerial photos suggest that sensitive biological
resources may exist on-site, similar in character to the Project area. This alternative
site is also in closer proximity to a designated Sensitive Ecological Area (SEA) located
in the Tonner Canyon area approximately two miles south of the project area. The
proximity to this area could increase the potential for indirect impacts to the sensitive
biological resources within the SEA due to the increased proximity of human activity
and the associated potential for intrusion.
No significant impacts to biological resources that could not be mitigated to a less than
significant level were found in relation to development at the Project site. This
alternative would be considered similar to the Project in terms of impacts related to
biological resources.
(f) CULTURAL RESOURCES: This alternative site is underlain by the same soil types as
the project area. The potential for discovery of both archaeological and paleontological
resources exists within the area. No significant impacts to cultural resources that could
not be reduced to a less than significant level were found in relation to development on
the Project site, and the same level of impact would be expected for this alternative.
This alternative would be considered similar to the Project in terms of impacts to
cultural resources.
(g) GEOLOGY AND SOILS: Compared to the Project site, the Tres Hermanos South
Site Alternative would result in slightly greater impacts than the Project because the
underlying risks are greater due to the alternate site's location within a drainage area
underlain -with alluvial fill. However, as with the Project, it is anticipated that with
appropriate engineering measures and best management practices, as defined and
recommended by qualified geotechnical engineers, impacts related to geology and
soils could be reduced to less than significant levels.
(h) HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Potential hazards related to the presence
or use of hazardous materials on-site would be similar for this alternative as for the
Project Site. Both sites have been used as grazing land and have not been previously
developed. No significant hazards due to aircraft would occur at either site, and
emergency access issues would be similar for the sites. Wildland fire hazards would
also be similar for these sites since they are in the same general area and are both
adjacent to undeveloped land. For these reasons, this alternative would not eliminate
or reduce any significant adverse impacts.
(i) HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: Impacts to hydrology and water quality
associated with development of the Tres Hermanos-South alternative site would be
similar to the Project site in that a substantial amount of grading and installation of
drainage infrastructure would be required as part of the development. Mitigation
measures have been identified to address potential impacts related to drainage frorn
the Project, and impacts would be less than significant. This alternative would not
eliminate or reduce significant impacts on hydrology because existing City Code
requirements and identified mitigation measures applicable to the Project would reduce
potential impacts below the level of significance.
(j) LAND USE AND PLANNING: The alternative site is undeveloped and utilized for
grazing similar to the Project site. The site is designated in the General Plan for
Agricultural uses, as is the Project site. Development on this site would not physically
divide an established community or conflict with a habitat conservation plan or natural
47
EIR PL2013-227
ConoDlUDit» conservation plan. This alternative vVOU|d require General P|@D and ZOOiOg
8DleDdnoeDtS similar to the Project, and VVOU|d maintain CDDSiSteOCy b8tWxe8O the Land
Use and H0USiDQ Be[n8DtS of the General P|8D, as well as CODSiSt8DCV with state |8vv
and regional p|8OS. NO significant |8Dd use and planning impacts were identified with
the Project, and DoOB VV0U|d be anticipated with this alternative. This alternative VVOU|d
be considered Sinli|8[ to the Project in terms Of impacts related to |8Od use and
planning.
/ki NOISE: Noise impacts are generated during C0OStR]Cti0n and during long-term
operation. VVhi|a this site is ainoi|3dy situated 8|ODg Chino Hills P8rkVV8y, it is not
adjacent to the GR -80 freeway and therefore S8|eCti0D of this alternative Site VVDV<d be
expected to FSSU|t in rno[giD8Uy lower noise i[np8CtS as CV[Dp8[ed to portions of the
Project site. With the identified mitigation U7e3SU[eS. the iOlp8CtS Of the Project YV0U|d
be |eSS than 3ignifiC3Dt, and this 8|[e[D8tiVe VVOU|d not eliminate or [8dUc8 any
significant impacts with respect tonoise.
(1) POPULATION AND HOUSING: Potential iDlD2ct8 with regard to population and
housing include iOdUC80erd of population g[OVVh or displacement of people or homes.
This alternative would result in 8 similar inducement tn pOpU|8tiOD growth as the Project
since both VVOU|d 8UovV Up to 490 additional hODl9S. Neither this alternative nor the
Project m/OU|d result in diSp|8Cenn8Dt Of people or homes. Therefore, this 8|teFO8tiVH
would besimilar tOthe Project vvithreSp8CttVpopU|@tiOO@DdhoUsinQinopacte.
(Dl\
PUBLIC SERVICES: Fire P[0tBCtVD — With the T[8S HermanVs South AKeOl8UV8,
fUhJnB development N0U|d occur within an undeveloped area approximately one mile
south of the Project site. Similar to the Project site, this alternative VVOU|d result in the
potential for increased fire service calls to an area that currently experiences negligible
activity. This impact VvOU|d be similar to the Project. Both sites have 3 GiDli)8[ 8XpO8UFe
to VVi|d|GDd fire hazards. Mitigation Dle@SUFeS identified in the Public Services chapter
VVOU|d reduce impacts Of the Project to 8 |eVB| that is |eSS than SigDifiC8Dt. and this
8|to[O8tiVe vvoU|d not 8|irniO8tB or reduce any significant impacts with regard to fire
protection.
Police Services — Similar t0the Project site, this alternative would [SSU|t in the potential
for increased police service o8||S to on area that cU[[8DUy HXp8[ieOCSS negligible
activity. This impact, would be similar to the Project, and identified mitigation [n88Su[eS
VVOU|d reduce impacts to 8 level that is |eoS than significant. This alternative would not
eliminate or [odUoa any significant impacts with regard to police services,
(D) RECREATION: All new residential development must provide p8dd8Od 0rpay in -lieu
fees in accordance with Section 21.32 of the City's Subdivision Code. This requirement
VV0U|d apply to this alternative site as well as the Project Site. No significant impacts to
recreation were identified in aoSnCi8tiOD with the Project, and OOD8 vv0u}d be
anticipated na|8tad to this 8|te[OetiV8. This 8he[D8tiVe YVoU|d be C0OSid8[ed Sinni|a[ to
the Project in te[[nS of impacts related to n8C[8@tiOO. and OO significant inop8[tS YVOU|d
b8eliminated 0rreduced.
k}\ TR/\N8P{)R/\T0N/TRAFF)C: The Traffic Impact Analysis for the Project identified one
inbaFSH[1ion (Phillips Ranch Road at Village Loop Road) VVh8[e potentially significant
impacts would require mitigation to oOOfOnn to adopted \eV8| of service standards. A
mitigation rne8SU[9 is identified that would reduce that impact be|Vvv the level Of
significance. Since this alternate Site is located n88[ the Project site. vVoU|d also take
@onesS from Chino Hills Pe[kVV8y. and VVOu|d generate the same traffic VO)UDl8, traffic
innp8ota vVoU|d be expected to be similar to the Project. Since mitigation noeesU[eS
have been included toreduce impacts Ofthe Project tn8|eSSthonSignificoni|eve|.this
alternative would not eliminate Vrreduce any significant impacts,
48
(p) UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: The Project and the Tres Hermanos-South
Alternative would generate similar demand for utilities since both would result in
development of 490 additional residential units. No significant impacts have been
identified for the Project and therefore this alternative would not eliminate or reduce
any significant impacts in regard to utilities and service systems.
7.5 Summary and Comparison of Alternatives
The comparison, presented in detail in Section 6.4 of the Final EIR, indicates that Alternative 1 (No
Project) would result in impacts that are both superior and inferior to the Project. For most issues that
are related to the disturbance of undeveloped land (e.g., Aesthetics, Biological Resources) this
alternative is superior to the Project. However, for Land Use and Planning this alternative is inferior
because it would not maintain consistency with regional plans and the City's Housing Element. It
would also not meet the basic Project objective of maintaining consistency with the Housing Element.
However, it is considered the environmentally superior alternative.
For most environmental impact categories, Alternative 2 (Infill Sites) would result in impacts that are
either superior or similar to the Project. For most issues that are related to disturbance of
undeveloped land (e.g., Aesthetics, Biological Resources) this alternative is superior to the Project
because the sites have previously been disturbed by development. However, for other impacts such
as Recreation and Utilities/Service Systems the impacts of this alternative would be similar to the
Project since both alternatives would generate a similar demand for public services and facilities. This
alternative would be inferior to the Project with respect to Land Use and Planning because it would
not maintain consistency with the Housing Element. For this reason, it would not meet a basic Project
objective. This alternative is considered the environmentally superior alternative other than the No
Project alternative.
For most issues, Alternative 3 (Tres Hermanos-South) would have similar impacts to the Project.
However, as with the other alternatives, it would riot maintain consistency with the Housing Element
and therefore would not meet a basic project objective.
49
EIR PL2013-227
ral
r r_
0
F
E
ir--
0
0.;-s o
FP
aJ
P
a)00
�>
OO
2 -0 a) 0.)
" �C:
0 �>, t5
C:
0
C) 0
IL
cu '0
r-
75
O
Ur—)
0
10
0
0;
CL
In
C
0
E o
7c
Cl
E
LO
LJ
0
-@ a) 0
:> W a) a
a) -0
>
C%3
E -0
CL
-0 s .
�c 0
a)
P
0
SD cz
CL
m
> C= p
W a)
_0
>
'n
O o
-Z5
(D cc
a)
Cc
—Ln ic"
(n
cn 0
'CL E co 0
0- a)
>
co
0
-E
(3)
C:
a)
a
WQ)
0
C,3 L)
cu 0
0 co-- cn
I=D, 5 m
8
2
a) M
.15 a) -
C, -2 -S
-0
CM _0
2 Q) E '0
oma
-a5
E C,
0 V) -05
-E 0 u) Q)
a)
.2 Z: .2
r� w
cn
u a
CL 0)
-a w =3
L) a)
ap lo 0
(D
E =
m P:
co
a) .
ED
T all
=3 0
E
0 --M
M M
-0
rn
0.
'o E2
NO
Mo
0 0
00
co, M- 7s
2 0
2 2
-0
a)
a)
.6 2 om -2
(D a
o
>
m
(D u2
I 0
cu n
0-
=
E
cm a)
8
co o o-, �e
(D
-S= a' -0 i6 2 -L
E cl
w
-
12
I cz
Fo
'n
-0 -15
.2
M (D �R C,
E 8, a) a)
-0 -0
-0
=3 w In
m CS) E
a)
'E 2 2 (D 0)
(D
5 2 um
F= 0-a- a)
E
Cl- M N a, 'w
�2 -te
'0' 0
15 Cc
"D >W W
o. tt� E =5 E
00 !� o o
-
E a) , I
z j5 0 g m M
75
:��
'= CL cn
cn 'o 0
ID OU
C' Cy
> —
0 0 -2 (D
>< 7-
W
(D
`
W -0 a) (D
-0 co a ca-
W <
-0 iD-
-0 (D
Z5 w
2 >6
-1 >
a) 2
w ff -5 W
(D -
(D 0 J:: 0
r
Cl
-05
U-0 CU 0 0
:>
0
C 0 '0 a
M 9; m
u ( -)
- CL
E 0 w
t
0-
> 0
-0 CL
CL 0).—
(D -2)
0
2
o E D' LL
D 0
Lli 0
UO L LLJ u 0
E
27 E -Z� (1) U) CU
M
15
an
CD, M =3
-0 a
0 = != ,
m 2 -
E
- p -0
0-0
o
=3
= 0-6
d. co
N
0
Fc
0
cE
.S
E
E 76
76
p
0
2
0 0
z
co
a)
> CL
> CL
a) ED-
O ET
IL - 0 cz
0VjUE
-E EE
O;t
0
0)
CD -
E
0 a
E a) u
E >
:2 =3
E ami (D
0
o a)
C) 0
ap
0 C) 0
E
—C
m
ca
ca
S2
'a
.2
Ca-
.2
nE
0
CL
<�
a)
2
ID
a)
7o co u) a)
a) > co�5
0 E -o a)
ac)
C�L 0
u,' E -:5 < Z a) c:- — = -08 -c-- c: co cn
x C- cn �o 'o o)
cn 0. cu co
(D a9 , A? - - cn 0 0 >
2 c= =3 cl- a) -Z5
-2- a) -o co 2 a)
cu o o cu 2 >< LD o 'G 0 a C. cu -=..c
,.0 7;5 a) -M -=o :fZ- ED a) 0 10 a) 6) — c=
c:> co ca �E >, 0
9) c" E 0--5 5- 1 '
a) CL cu C:) -60 . - o , -, g < -a - c= -
= w
cL U a) < -2 15 .2 aS Q) o u) a)
(D a a) o (n E -c;5 '6 c= a) o
cD u) in 0.
a) -o cL . a) a)
cL a) :t-- >0 15 - :�
m o E U) o) > o -o a)
Al c =
cD cD.
f cy) E o if 9) o
OU . E > u) 2 3,15
cu cL cau cl) o w o 0 O. co
-FD
-o cn cl -o
top I a 'o -o =3 �o
U) cu a)
a) a) 0 co E o -o 2 �: '- 2 '-a) cu m
03 E
cz o 0- a) o) 'ru , = = a)
> -a) Z5 m 'InD ao), '-a) Cwo
E
c: a) E a) c.
-E c�- -0 -o '2 0 o tz-- to m w cL w cu —o
-o a) w cD w >,
-2 , (p �b :2 IS
0 a) ID wc, 5. .2,) co Lm �,- -mo— ::- : lfu= c-, .2
cl, a) co a) Lli a) Q)
o cn Q) Al S --:
m tt-- cu cu cz
o- -o
(D 0) a) 23 LE Al a)
CE) CD- U) a) (D h� CL
En a) (D u I
r
(D a) c, E x (D L o Z6 S 9
(>D I -o > - -C� C: I -o
a, 7FD 0 0 a) '0 > - 5'
> 0 ( -0 - c) a) ',)) cn E
.2.
E 2 15 i:- 0 o :6 R =)
u) cn P (1) E (u CL w 0 co cr cr.
co,
co m >(v li') cu -.� �: - -r, . -S
03
8 mo 2 w
E @5 0 S
(n ��, cu -0 cu (-- , E -q a) -F, -0 0 E
w 'E (.D =3 E -- '
-F ry C) - x .- u G
m 0 2) w -ami 0 'ao, cm, cu 0
o 0 �o 0 a) cl) Z w (D
.§
—m-- cy) I'D :g Lu cL) .�= _c-_ w
= — — > w E 'U5 - E E u) cn
0 '�2 '�n- -2" 'D --0, 'wo c -
a) CD Zn
n — mm
m A E -0- 2
U) -o
0 -8 — w o E
= = -;-- CO > cl, -a- Cla) 2 oD (n
CL a.) 2
I 'o 0 CIlCD Ca) a) = 0 a) U) E
cn o c) O'E cL
(D 0 w o 0 > o -o u) 9 E -0— a)
2 n
c u) =3 = (D a)
m a) E a) 75 'E5 m co = m m w -o t= E :F; E
a -E �- J" (P E cu a) _o
�5 " !� -, 'o
'S u) a) a) 2
E -Fa 0 u) > - - �2
W
ID E coc75 E 75
a) a) (D �6 tS n .2,
a) o
p = _ -9-- 0-
,::, , _, .2) 7E -5-, 2 -r, CL 5 cL o (D
-o -o o
IL E 0 R�l cn o.
E
>-, c�:�E 0 o. a) in- a) =3 if=- 'o m cu (n c-- 0
=c") >a<)
a)
oo — E 5 w(D aci
w :�F 0 0 a) co o>
CU (D < 0 T 'n > 4�- cL g, = 2 cr
cL 0
a) Z
cu L)
d
LL -o U) co
0
0
O
IL
E 0
C:
0)
0
CL
-E
O
0
N —CD
-0 0
m M CL
w
0) U) a) 6
D z
0 -o a)
U)
M
0 —j
2 0)
(z C:
.2
m 0
.2)
-2
0
E
(D
C'
cl
CA
m 0)
2-3 1:0),
V) =1 1
0
En
CO -0 0
'�2
0 CU =3
O 2
f
U)
0
0
(D 0
0O
ca_ 0
0
EfE
a)
-E E
05
=3 CL 1
=, 0-
E
E >
E
0 (D
0 a)
CD 0 0
0
cu
cu 0
0
CL
CL 0
CL
0-
< E
a) -0 0
'n , a) =
a- >
cu
ru
=0
CY) C>U' =3 = �: —
o@ 0 -Fu
(D 0 cu co
-- — = -2
qu))
7, -0 a) m
.2 'o-,- -S-: '0
0 >,
0— 0 =<
u
0
-m
> -I--
0
w 0 S w m >,
- SM '=M 23 ID .0
> li5 8 =
'.
0.0
CU C�t-' ID
- �6
b S� - -Z5
-:e o E
2.0 -- -0 to (D
C= -0 a E
0 7--3 15
-2
Q) cli
Ln 'L o
2 �S E a)
0 0 0 _0
0 23 (D
0)2
-0 cu CL =3 0-
0),
P
?3: 0 E 'a) ("D 'C) -F - -
01 CU
0
M
0 a E -0
0 •CAO Q 0 CL
E (D 2
.2 (D (V
0 0 2 �2 0 (;5 co cu
<
.0 >
cq
a) ul
75 -0
a) o0 N
cu m a)
= — - — w 'L
a) o -0, q)
4-- Q -0
CA
-t5 =
>=' P 2
cz C: C:
IH
(D
m
. —
3: U) .2 0) o a) E -0 5 = 0 c
wa) mm CU Ct3
10 _0
2
m C::
a) a)•(D Co O=
ID -0 n --�
�Ec 2 �- 5
:t :3 c�
o 0— 2
E -0
E m ca a) a)
>,-,
15 M 0 CO =3 -2
: E w o cl� -(7) a) ct, -0
0 V) �m C� I=D CL 5, -a (D
(D (D a) 0
E 0):E; E
M M
Cl)
0 CL cu :E 10 0 (D c:) in O
0 0
cu a) m
(D
ID
(D
m 15
U)
a) (D
M m T
E m E
a) cz U) (D
�) �d >
0-0 m a) = 2 ca can) 15 OF
75 0 2 S CL -� a)
E a) -o
a) a) - 0 'Ln (D
0 0 a) 0 m
E in- o
E m
00
-
LD a, (D :a- =0 -0 —= E D E
0 (nD
E
i m m m E E E CD -0 '0
- -ffi — 'Z mO- -= au) -0
C)
0
-0 Q) 2 E
cz 2 cu c�L 15 - �5 ow -2 16
0 (OD -2 2
Z �o 11 u > CL = 0 0—
-0
2 (I
-,E
.-
2 -0 C'W7 E 12= E -0 0
a R 0 E =
w 0 0o. 2 0) (D
-0 0 Cl ID
0 E
�LD
-0
A
C,
a)
ul 0 0- -0 0 -0
m
t--- 0 m 15 co 0
m
c 0 lun,
cnu a) m o) a,) 2-0
OM, a)
(D
U) 0 0
a)-0 0 a
W (D 0)
C@ . Zn 5), u C-) 5 um) 0 w
I- (D
M
D
, . , S = E
U W 0
—=3
a a) -0
0 - 0 0 i> 0 4; 0 0 T:� 0 (D E a
'n ci -0
U, -0 C—L =0 cn m E E
CL
5
D E
s 0, 'c
Er (D
(D- a) S
rn Ca.
0 (D
0)
m c- _0 0-0 a)
cn G o �2
-0 M C�- -0 m
01 76 -C
= Z �
0 (D w w -, _0
c� co:) 0 In 75 �5
CD C, -0 �5
CU CD- 0 QO)
G) 5 E u) = 12 (D cu
(2 -C-- 0 1- cm o
0--o
co c
cn C
-0
En (n 0 (D cu(D
Co 0 Min CU,.@,V)
3 15 (D a) =
z L 0 LE5
0
_-O
( t- 0
=3 CL M E
co
.0— w
ca M .2) (D
0 CL H2
CL o a a)
0@ .E 0 E F- 3: -o CL CL
cr
C6
cy
C?
0
m
.0
co
U
N
O
d.
E o
� C
O ps
a. N
O
C �
Q •� N
N O M
0� N CD
C:J
Lij ° ) Z
�O- C Cn
C U)
0 J U
O '(n
0
� O
Q
I
E
0
E
O N
C 01
U
G Q
m
cz
cc
o
a) a
ate)
c
U) �''�
L
(n
o o
O m
p as
D)
o_ M
—
Op
O
0- O d
O
5
U
U
.T NiF=
O
O
c Q0)
O o
c
0)
G
70
U
m
CD
m
m
U
O
O-2
`
o
O
M E
a)
m
C:
0)
0
O
d
Q o
Q O_
Q
O_
d
s'
Q E
o U
U
'C in CU
C -
(O m "O
y
CQ O N
co
_
O O.. N
O
a)
-O � Q) C �
U O o -O
C fC6
O..
� CU Ca
CO
m
O -� d'D U
U O
E c
_ -O
C6
L.. O_ U C'7 C
_ c6 O
U
C a) O C d (n
a3
•.T C6
O 'U L C
-D 0 vi
(O N a) ra - O (O
O Cn 'O O
a] O n-
CT) .- = N •` -O a)
C co U in
@ C p Ca
ate) t4 a) cc C
0- C
O Q- d 0
cD'u D a) ani m o w .0
p
a o m
,.
a) .F o aa) m ami
N -
o� E 0 a) 3 0
0 c _ o
o a) o Z5
a) -N CL •- ccs `D
E E c c e
m •'o > � Z
E O
� .c in (n n. cn
c E o m o m
..�'' c4 o a7 ate) -" c -C
C> U a ca
c0i
n Q .� co 0� a_` )) aa))
a) a7 O 0
o •°> m .� a= m m
O = Q a) 0. C
cca
D_ n E D
.a N a7 C1
m `o � =
[a a) O CO c0 Y
aDi
D c O) o o a a
L-. a) 0. O C CCn6
lCV
`O .L-•. -0 N o a
C1 O •D O m
L a`) p n
D).�'D
L c o m
fl- C O (O U p .,L...
o m E a) T c
m 'C
0 p d U G D to
D E cu D .D
mo `6 0 P
Z
3 0 c-0 3 o Q)
d
vN c o •o
O
o a) o D 0
L-. ' C6 (a
3 c o •o c E c
0 N D a) 0
(6
Y
o. o `o_ E L
E c Y D 3
> U)
m w c Cj r c
c v m m cu
C) O �Q.. d. C m
u Co LD-. a) .Q
C U .c FL-
o o -o -pC Dp-
'O N '00 p E C "� U
M a) ci E �c
_
0 D a) ~ co c c
o6 � a3 � D
_
U O m a) a)
c D n a) E o
O d a) N U O
C c0 a) E
p U C a) f0
E`p G O E 'a
` E
N 'D
Q) in C
O .0 Y C
N (� O_ N (d WW
a) a) 0
C O
a) L@ Y p
c
C
o- to ,` d
C
O c9 (Q O C
a a)
d. OU E L E
,C C
a3 'C O O L_
0
cu
O 'n
�
_C
0
C
O OU @ 'D
N
m
' O
(D .�'D = N O c
'D L
Q>.Cn = `
-55 OC
N
c6
= U (V <°
"X
a Cn
'D
o D
q-p
0 O w
Q O .0 O -T. C .0
fl
"O vi aa)i
N d 2 O O
a)
Cn f6 `-
p) CO _ a) ri ai
n- .O
N -D d U '5 C- »-.
} a m L E
N -D 'D
co
m a) D U c
a) E a) U a)
N� a) -D L
O C co
n a) 0 E
cn (9 Lam, CV C = rCnis
ca n_@ o ma E
- C Q (D O. (9 L
o
o a) o D .E
'S Cn :-. C
m o c c n o o cy aci o
L Q) (9 0 d a) '� .0 (6 C E -
"O
I `o 0 o.9 E a
c E CO C
C
.o -E 6 °s Z Q
U (6 'D Cl Q) O .D
� Y "D a3 a) Q a)
,.- O O 0 m N U
Cn � C T m`@ d L U p O_ U
C D' N E L -0 Cn T.- `
-6,
O¢ cn = U -
O E
C 0 -p D to C
N, C __ D O- CD
"D
I � O 0 N Cn n3
m c_D
C6 C O C N N .2,0- cc" I .0 D- in
a a) o o a
m
m Cn N c6 .0 N a7 _�
3 -E f° c
Q. W 0 d n3 L cn
.3 a)
o L a) co
m
o v ac) a) 0
cE c o
15
a m o D n c a E>
ami c a)
c os .N aci
,Uc-.. '� m
m a) w n a m o
o
n°
cn L
�' c a
_
O O L
o n E
o
"y O C
Dcn -6@ o
-O) N N q' -
1= •E c re o,
a`'i aci E
`y D a °� aUi
m Z D~ �_ is c"a
'E m E U x c°
1-1
o u �° co n o =o
E n
D@ a a E
axi
Y C,m L_ 6 Q)
@ a) O`
LD c
a) C (D
L D N O L aJ L
0
C
Q) 2 G C a3 L�
O 0.. D a)
o
U
O E D s as ��
cca
L D D C a)
F- CO D) G1 c9 ZD "O
O a) cn 3 a) n
I- D) a U m e
_
o
00
'm
'm
m
I
E
E
CD
a)
0
U)
> r=
E
-0
0 a)
cl
0 0
cl
0)
c
co
U Ol
2 cu
2 c 0 0
CL m c a)
cu >0'
m
U)
=3 CM
cn
ch
L -0
=
U) =1 .0
-0
CL a)
co 0-
0
M C� 0- C a
cc M
U) _0
2
0
Fu 2
0 Cc
0 0) CU
0)
c::DCD
we
O
.0
co
146 (D 0
Cc I--
0
.01
C:
Co
.2 00
- 6
Cl 0-0
0- 0 0- 0
-FO
(II
HE
0
0
0
0
0
CD
0
0)
a)0)
c
cc
_0
_0
_0
m
m
m
CO
ca
.S2
0')
0
0
cc
cu
CO
ca
C:L
.2
0-
.2
CL
0-
0-
C�
<
CLa-
E
< E
a)
a) o,>
CU 15
iB
a)
-Fz
C cn
cu 6 -0 w M 0
(D
co tn
o LD)
>
ED 0 c, u;
-0 0
(D
>
12
2 T m
0� En
cz , (D
=3 (D
CV " w WO 0 a> -
-0
CO n D
'Q)
6 Q) -0 �5 �LD
cz
CO
0 CL u) C�
0 0 m —
CD
'on - C, EL t3
-- C) E2 a) o -0 "0 -0
0 2)
-0
< CO (D -0 Ef
-0-
(D
-0 C/) cu
E R
a) C5 a) 0-5
a) E o'
-OC:
Z=
(D E -0 a)
P
E
cu 2 0 E �2
E cu a o, W
C=L) C"U cu can) (cnu (D
(D J--
cD w 'u -6 ` a)
'E3
Z6
0 m
2 o 0
CL a -
=0 (D '0 (D
0 "a) >
5; (D
2
Ow mo 'D u .2)
2
E , CL M - = 0 �b C� �:
gn o- 0 -,5
(n -0
0 a -0
a) cu = J-- 0 2
-5; c-) S E >
a)
-Z5 a) G) _0
, I
a) CD E
E
a) .2 a)
-c o u E 10 o' a)
-,u
'u �o m cu
-=tO
I E
E In -
0
10 co r- �I?
0- (n a)
2 0 2
V5 -0
CD (n cz P
c=u 0' 2 0
-2 (D Om
CL a) o
-0
0 E:
0
E LIU
C7 E 0 a)
OE
'D a)
0 0 0 0 o
0 -0 0 m 0
-So
!:_:f
cu CL Ln
CD 6) 0 w 0'
>
> E 0 -0
0 cu (D E cn
C
E
.2 c 0 a- R
(D ffi w- co 0
-6 = w 0' 0
In (D
6
w a
0 - E
a)
R3
:3 CO CU
U CJ O -0
(D a)
CL JOD 07 0 a) a)
a
E
Zn U 0-
0 u) a) C) -0 0
w -
o
cl:= cz
Q 15 m a
-j
Q)0 C'a
_0 m (D I a' 010-
-0 'rn-- 0) - 0 V)
:3 1 a) 0 a) (OD
0 -C
0) 0. cu
0
V < P fy ca
E
0
In E -c5 u) z�
0 c'3
0 'N 10- -M �o (D --o
0 CL
-,r cD E '5; =3 o i; 6
-,- a)
E; E
o
�o can) w cu
au) -0
-0
F
a) E
-0 L) a)
-a
- = *�E
(D -6 mai
E E E P (D
-0, :.�- m a) - - -F,
=1 Om
W= 0
E 2-
a) t
=Cu
0 :s
5 -2 m w o
76 0)
w a >:
6) E In L,, -0 N W 0 CU
-0 (D = -0 -5) 0 '=
0 (D -
E 0 3:
W
Ex C'u W, !��
0 M M _t_-
(n
(D
a 0
C 0 W -C3
0 0) LT- 2 Q)
0 Q) 0
0 cu
1 0 0 E =
O)w
'D
-0 CL E 07.- ft --
75 -L-: 0
E a) E-
C� C: -C
CD
o cu
-2- co z, -"1 00
-0 W �: co a) :3. 0
0 C
- 0 -E m
� 0 0 0
E2 u, _0 -§ GI In >: 5 C,
(uD :> 0 r-
U -jg 2
�5. -
rn
-2 O> U) CZ3 (D
Cl) 2 c: -
'E
0 au)
6 -�-
'21 .9 _0 T
In =3
0 a)
Cl _0
M_ a)
o-"- E -ca
R C:,
- >,
E C, 0
0 0 cl U-0 0
-�ffi 0
7; -C) f
0 -0 a)
< - 0
V) w
C a) C13 -0
-�? 0 (D
E L -�S
0 0- 2'- - > a)
'j'-
(D
0 a) ca
- cu !=
�S� -r- u c
E - 2
cz = -S-: -C, w
m a) C� 2 w m 0 -c---
�w ,�s 0 L) o. = - 0
a) u)
0 to 00 (v =1 'E 0 Cal 0 1
E W-0,
a) :1 -6-0
p -
ID C'�
-W -0
e) C:L
vC
ND0
(D 6
0 mL > ::,-
CF 0 'n 0 Co X (n
= E
-1
j- '-' - a) 0
0
W -0
0- W
0
2
> -0 E -W - Lu 1:3
'o ia .2 v '0 a)
B a o ca
a D. -O 0-0
_0 ol -
- 'u - a)
[2 0
-0
M �W
7FD D t--
-Fa
a) 2 c
�2 -!5 2 07
R o
0)--
Lj _0
0 <=
um, a) 0
�� -�3
0 -0 >
- 0 '5 0- Ow
E 0
:9 om
.22 4:- 0,
CL 6 � .2- -10Z 1=1 =0 (0,
0) -S >
Z 0
C) (1) 2 6 a)
0 o CU cu 0�:E
o -0
i2 ,w 0
2- TU UZ
C9O
co
.2
m co
11
E
(D
U
0)
0)
cn a
cu
(nu—,
-0
E2
.2 Co . - M
6):t-
(7)
0)
.-
cu E -o
0 co
CL - �3 E2
0 0. 0)
75
0
0
0
It–
4 =
�F–
0
0
cn
0
co
cu
co
.9
Q
S2
ca-
ca-
CL
0 —a E
0)
V cu a a)
Z5 cam o 13 :E -Z
>
cm 0
a a
Ed -0
a
a) >
E 15 c:,_ lu a
a 76 -0 n
(D M Cl 0 < a)
n -- 2 :S -0
-0 :5 =3
>
0 a) Co = a
Co cm ID k-- .0
cn . 6, m 6 S� - a) o 2
- CM -6 co a ') cu := �o 2-0 -6
a) Cl. a
< .,n
w 2 -
C -ru
a) w C-5-0 0,
m -6, 2 -
15 cr -0 a) a > a) a a) 0 a C5 2
a) .5 - CU 0-- cu c� 0 3: ;-- G Zn
E "ffi o-, L) ' 9, 0 E 0
i:- C> :t�
a 0 C/)
Vi -0 E2
(D a) Wa)
W
> .9)
a CU G) Q) '65 CD 2 a)
co O. �ru -0 W >, (n o)- cm.0-
2
a
-0 0 a) 'Co..
0 0 iz-
cL m m 0
C) -0 E
< o c:,- a) 0 E fi
C` m 0 0 -2 [2 u5
cu -a -0 w
E -0 a)
O�
fn :E:- =3 Cn
:t-
CL a) w 0
C, pi-) , " a)
(D Z a) -a a 0 a
u) 4-- 0 -0 a a CY)
=5 cu -om
w E -,6
m CL a
o a) o o
a) C." Sj
a
-0
E5 cA Z (D - 15, a E
co a) D �� = - 3: 0 Zn o a)
Q =1 a) E a)
a) >) 0
Z.n 0
-0 Co Ln Z
, a)
-Ccb-- -Z-: -0 (1)
a) E2 = 0
aw2wwmo>:s=
(D a) E a) um) 0 (n E -5; ru L) cm 0 Co
o, 0 2 a 5- a)
(D -10 a)
E
ww w a 0 a •2
0 0
c,
- w , Ej=- -C ca-,=
a (D o a),= 0 E cu M a E E E
a a Inn o- -t- cz a M E -M
a)
0 w 0 o
a E L)
(D cuco,
'o C
w
CL - a < 0 a L :) c U)
- E a) (D :E; -o o -) co =n' S
co cu E a 0� a a) m 0
'E
0 m _0
In w a) cz
w
cz - 0 E 0
a Om a D
00- (,J:: co
0 C-
C)
2 . - 76 L _Z6 -So 0
-C3 E2 -cu
M._In c` cu 0 -0 w (D 0 < -
0) �E
-t
m co co
2 -0 An a) 0 a
>"
-7-- - E o
a 21 n a) a)
m C) Z5 j�j a a) -E a)
>
cu o >
'(n o :2 -0 (D
Ln
:g ',n C13 00
a) 0
a) E -6-6)
2! U) C) Co a) >1
a a) (n E2 -C X-- o 0 2 0
E a) = - a) cL E oca
0 -o 70
0
=5 =)
W E cm, -
(n cu a) _0 lu
-0 -- E
-- E a)
.2 2 0- a) Z5
E =3 -- C, 2
ol a) -cb o -0
= '61 W S E C-) 2
>0
c,: -o
a
-0 cn > - j-�
a) (n -05 Co -a) `o0 w a
-ru
- 0' 0, =
0 a)
-0 W - = = ao)'E
C,
(D - zg -�' ft� 9
C -U
a -a
-0 C� >
co cu =3 w :�-� = )w
-a a -FD
'0 w
-�- a
m C6 �o -0 :E- a) co 72 uo) E R: = M
=3 m cu (D
ccu a
75 cu Q)
a co �2
a M (D Z 7E
E -a ca
0 .2,) E2 2 f :S _0
-
=0 -cu 'n '6- cu C"
0 T 0 " 0 0 -F M CM 0
'0 7ffi
C�5 CL
0 0) m (D 0 'D 0 0
E V5
:s 0 0 m
C L E (D a S a, P Z5 cn
D LD
a Co
cOC" cu C 0 (D 2-
c .: g. -�� :g G 2
-0 0 U .-a Q) (D '&= c.) 53) - 2 'a) 6 =5 :�-
0 cn a a) _0 0 0-
w
.2
OM
-- 0-,!= = a V(>. - M 0 Coo (D
E In -0
0 0 �2 2 S- -= L �'-D cu a, E 6.2 a 0 a 0
_0 a
�5 0 CL2 M=fr :EO
0 -Z6 0 2 _ (n "E 0 M cu a) a, 1 -,5 -0 72
a _ p >. -0 t5 M15 !6 0 0 u�
In F m 6 a ca_ a
�2 0
12 0 x
w - C)
= a u)
a) 2 = W 2
0
=3
-a :E
-
75 .2 0 M CX3 (D a C) Co m
0
U, u) >, E 0 E -5
(5 0
oM
a Zn = w cn
0 0 'E cu a)
-a (D m_2 cn :5 a)
m -EL
a
0
o (D
a (5- 0 co 2 1 E :(�D` �ao) 'S
a) a) a) a)
0 E -cn M, 'M a- 0- -0 F- 0-00 M co) a
z 0 0 -C
0
C., 2
C?
L?
11
m
oE
W
(D
03
0)
=3
ulU)
0 0)
0 CIO
0):= c
f 6)
0 cc
6
EFE
0
cm
A=
M
M
.2
CL
CL
CL
CL
_0 (3)
a, Mm
E
ca"
M
0 cn
(3)
i�5 '0 a)
-Fu 2 =cts CUU
>.
ual)
Zn 2
41 O 0 0
>. --ffl 0. (L)
0 0) 0 M
0
E E E
M
a)
oa
g C": a) _0
= , _lz a) E
M
0-0 0- m a) — cr
-0 0 (1)
tf cu (1)
0 CN 'o o
C) CD =3 (n
O C)
o a) -o
w w
M
ID. -0
'R a)
Ci = a)
t_- CC) cm- 1(1--) ��
0 C) — 0 M U) a U)
o F- U) = (L) (L) -0 a)
(1) 0) 3:
-Z6
cu
E (D
=�; M M 0
o
W �� 70 0-0 *ti5 _,ff -LI) al)
M -°)o a) a)
g ��: -_ 0 O.
-0 C13
") _�F; �2
E (1)
CD a) 0
Q. 0 CM (3) '6' . — O.
Q) M 0
m (1) E
n
a) (D
Fn-
U>�,
0 ED
M (3)
T
�a 0)0.,—
0
—',U, E ID
E
w2:
E, — >. — s
0 , -Z;, , _m a) ,
E
0— 'In, 0 0
— o
-o
_C'
a) '(p 'O
M
M > 2
0 'D cE (1) D.
0 E Cmu —ME
a) CD_ J_ -
8,
a)
a) �= -0 a) (1) E
-Z
OL -t:f = 0)
0 0 C:
E , �Q cu
0>
o m Eo
E) pu
(C) C) F (>L) M a) C 2 0,
-0
w> E -5i -,5
-0 CD 0) W
= tEi
0 Fo
m
- a) 0.-
= , a) E a) -a :F; uj ca C
M (L)
, 2.(-- - 2— (3) (1)
Q) a,
" = = (D
'2 M
0 co -a
0)
2�C a)
E E
C,
.0
ca C" '6 (D
f cl — 0 (1) 0
'— E 0-0 0 E 0
0
q U
(1) (1)
CL 21.2
0 (1)
a: 2:- 6_2 0 -t5
=03
o
E E -- — 'c: m — -a E
tr) _5 a) c.' 0 m m
j-_ m
,
U) U) cf)
_F a)
-a
0 0 Cl) -0
CL E — U) (1)
E a) ca)
w m M — % CL
M
(-, 0
= ,
"
0c@i
"a E a—) R 0
76 > m a) (D W 0 M Q) Q.
m - CL
w I-- a) �O - (D > �g -95
m
M M 2 w
12 0 -t5 .2 Z5 _,5
-0 E
C5
'E 'E ID
0 0)
M
0 -2 E (D
75 q r_- 72
(n -0 (D (n co =3 M cp=5 a E a)
U) r— = o 0 a __�D -2 W -
W
c 0.
2 0 0 E
E
=, .0
a) a) > m
w E 0
In 75 �6 , M 0 — 0
=M t=-- _T2 0 (D
'Fm
- 15 — 15
-o E 0 _T w o o
Ra-
76 0
o .,T
c) E E
-z5
a) (D Co :3 0 -0 m
Cl_ 2 C.) (D
a a M 0 ca
. M 0 a) a) b3 C)
E
:E
MO 5 M 0
E 0
CD CD- -0 C) Fa =3
CD_ _0
C, U
(D > a)
'6 M W -2 c.S. �i — 0 a) -0 c' E a) 0-0
-0 0 2 0
-6 (D 0 C�
-0 'n -0 a) U)
c (n
C, _Z5 M OU 75 -6 UQ) 'o- 0. I= Q,) - Z6
.0 -, a M
In NOVG 0 -0 0-
0 0 U5 (D o
>
o 2-1--
cn In
:6 0
E a) u w �2 w (D C) 0- (D
(D a) (D m a) __ 90) (m- 00 E -0 :5 w P (D 2
-2 0.0-0 '— C7)
C13 > >
-ffi
M E OE 2Z7;) ou -D 0 V 0 c'- (D
o 2.E
-0 -0 =3
CL ", :6 GM = m 75
3 o G) 0 co c—n -0 12 2 6 m m 0 _V5
0 -
E E 2 Q)
(n cD
2-2 2(D
, 2
-0 (D 0) -0 M -0 u c
-0-1-- 0 m- .5 - -F
CL 6 0 0 �E w .;�? <
OM — -C- — 6 -2
cu m >
= = < CD.
< 0'a < EF— m
c a) co a) M — -2 M C< M J-_
�s :s 0
-5 .2 mL 0_ 2 cn 0 2
=3 QU) 0 r'z
mm ==3 �>g '�F C)>:
2 Z5 M �2 ry
2 2-Z5 m a) m
2 CCU,-� JE 0, CL W
QO
CL
m
I
E
0)
=3 0)
U)
CY)
cm
cu
.0
—0
0
O
O)
co
OCl
co
as
.0
CL
<
(D a) -0 -0
0 .0
-2 U0, — -
m aoO )
ca
�E - C) m 00
(D a) 'L. :E w
-j 0 0 > cu cn
0 co
0,cn 2 W. a) co- 0 ?,.. 0 0 a) --o
0
c �S� U) -0 M Co
0) (D co C: —
c :E w cu =)
2
0 In a) > -�e a
E 2 E -0 ol 'm cu (D
'a
c.)
0-6-2 d�'O0 0
cu
a_
a)
co Fb w a) O)o E E
-oa cu E M mo -0 = -T-3 o E E
5; - �;) m m
= a) .— — —
u) o cc S P
— =3 (D = (D co C� 2-9? 0 00 a)
C� .0,
�o N=- 0 CU CL (D
cD X 5 E [2 E
(D
6, (6 F 0 C)
(D -0 o a) 0
in N
0, C)
> si -
-L - , 0
E
C
2
E cq) w E 0 E U) w a w m w W :G —
o = 2 f cc) < (>D = m•E- CD :3
2 8) a)
M C� _ 0 a)
-= co a) j- >
(D
CL
a) —
a) 0 a) �cu LO 0 cu a)
cu :3 -0 CU (D G)
E E cr 2 2 0 0
< OL (D
Co
a) cn -0
E
m >
LD Q:: a) M R=
Co 0 0 0 E 0 C --u C-) < -0
0 -0
•—
:E; - -0 0= W 0
a)
0 'i
0 a)
= — M o m u) -f� .2 En
>< 0 - G ;;-- o U) a)
(1) go a) 'E E E co
E
E cS 0- E
00 -r< :t-
E
(D =3
U) 0
>
0) <
E ca (D R 0 0 a) E o =j w E
CD
w -�a =1 (n a) 3: E
> u) Sr
= Zc
N
a)
'm 0 3: , 0 o
S ol-- E — - - CO 2 -�> . = �5 —
0 a) T M 10 20- c) E
10- 9) 9? a-) (D (D
a)
0, a) a)
-d5 2
T=
ca -
a)
Z-2 o o
'o,
-0 w a) a)
a) m a) 0 0 E SO o -0
p cu 73 cO a) Q.
u -i — CL— CL
cu cu 0 E
cm 0
co
0
0- E a) 0 c" > 82 E -6
> CO a) =3 0 o- a) E c3 -0
-M 2 a,
cu C) U)
c- cu
(n 0
70
0 — m . -�� _ 72
0 0 -0
0 0 CD > 0 (D 0 ?� -)
'D m m 1p
0 ol 0 tm
0
Ln < -0 0 M 0 0 CD. a) E a' -= --
-0 a) E 0 a)
-0 Ix I
a) E E 0
U- a) -00
0
a) Lp
2 ID W'o ul o = S-- a) co :!:- 0
E co
m U) 0 0 0-0 :2 r =j E
. 2-0
M 0 -0 C7)
-FU -0
_0 <
w C) a)
0 a) a) 0 a) 0 a cu -0 0
a) co ';= = -0
E >
C"
0 (D (D
u.) E .2 1:11,2
0 .2
E
> - a) 64 0 0 -E m
Z5 �2)
E 3* c) 0 >0 -0
a) E
7: -o w
E -2 2
=0 2- =
0 Ca
U) 0 z
0 cn r- '0 0 o
m a) M CU
FU p _�D
-
.S; m , M a)
.2 a) — u) CR E '0 o U) m a)
L :s 10,
E
E..�2 =
0 0 2 - 6
L, - =3
E -0 - o a) a) a) 0 o w 0 0
0 0
co
c- — T5 0- (n -cu
0 (3- E o oO 2 -o
cn _0 0 3 6
co 0 5; p -. .-6< 0 0) _ w < o E E (D 2
-0
-12 cll cL u),6 -0
6 u
a)
2 < cm 0- r-:
9) (D a) Z 'Cl E 0) cu E E -
0 0- CD 0 0 0
- c'
(OD)
CL , c: - - a a)
m cL m
IM -0 CU 0 M m 2.-
00 0) c, -2: E 0 75 C:l :F; C-)
> 0 0
�5 ,
a) ct3 2
0) 0
- = , - �5
'- s�� co Fn E
.0-0 G)
-
0 c& F- —
co
M �o
w m = 0 > Cm co
OL 02)
-C:)
0 z C�j cli
Ec" u 40D 2
0 m o
C?
a) 0
cr
CD
I
I
a, E
E
E
a)
C:L
M
ca
m 0 E
cu E
C:
M
M
=3 M
U)
C7)
U)
0)
cn
E2
Cl) 7,
co D
.L
cn
U) 0
Cl)
12
En
cn L
CY)
-0
E2
.2
•
cu cr
Cj)
C
=:s
0 m
cu
cu
m
co
to
2 m; Fo r--
-6
0
0'15
CL
-ffi
-Fu
0
75
m76
0
EF
tF=
EF=
0
0
0
O
O
0
0
M
0)0)
as
:E5
co
M
M
M
co
CO
m
0-
CL
0-
CL
0-
CL
CIL
0-
CLo
<
<
<
<
75
C.- 0 .o
r- 0-0
o ao)
Co 0 >
0 m a) 2
—
0
0 'n
15
w
c
0
co
0 o m -r-
:5 E 2
.2 0
45 -0
LE
Ecu
Ln
-0 0
a)
0
Z5
(D
E
is
_0
E �5
0 0)
a) j:- a)
E_ -0 0) n
-16 m o E
IOD -5 'En -�=
(D
CD
w
w =
(D
:tf
Z3 -0
0,
o,:=
-o co
E M
(D
w
E
E
ca =3 M
a) -0 �2 E -o
-0 CD Co r- -Z. E
a — ED .- = LD:�� 'o
(D a)
co -c- -c- m
c/) C5
�;-
Co -0 )
m
w
0
0
U w
-
M
[2 W CL '
> E
o p = a) — C:
cct- -0 = E m E ca
co -0
-
C7) 0 0 3: -6
(D c�
-Se
Co
0)
-2 m -E
E cm (D
0 E W r- CU
0 E C�" (D :�j!
m a) a)
M o E
S' LO
-
m -5
0 a)
0
'm a) E
m E m E
M
0'
Ru
m
a) E 0M) m
'15 m
am E
0) U) m E
co a) 0 E
10-
tt- M -2 (OD J--
C, 0
E 1 0
CO
0
C:,.
•LD
co a) U,
a)
:2 a)
c"
— >1 a)
a :t--
(D
(D
E 2.0 wa
In a) (D ..Ln C) (D
(u E , cm
— cn a) C- a3
-0 C) -Fi 0.
rr M —
1-- c- 72 0-
U)
0
0
cn.2 > 0-
0 m -r, 0 0 E
o MO*E:E— -
9—a:R< -2 E
0 M - 0 tj-- [)�
-- � 'M (D -0 0
Lj
(D -0
-�-u 0
a)
0
0(0
cc, 5 -5 S
m o 0) E
m (D
Ln m q =3 a) 3:-o E
o OF (0), S- L,
0 m
U
Cx
.0 In
0- c,
a) 0) -0
E 0 0 cJ (�D>
0 -0 CL
(D (D
ED-
-0 Q)
--2 2 E E
*�i
- a) c" 2 E
0 (D 0)
m
-2'-
>—E
L 2
w
ID = 0
M 0
0, a)
I- (D U)
as
W n
E cu -
E 0 C5L Eau)
=)
M 4- a) -
=3
(D CL
0
E
Cn
as 0
0
cu -o E m 0 15
CL = U
0
0 .4-
=
C -Fo - -ffi M r-
w M
a)
5
o m — cu a)
� '2 vi E
w
(D E
2 a)
0 _0
0 m
0
0 a)
E m 2 E2 o (1) —
a) (D 0 0
5 =
w w-2 m m m
CL M m-
0 �o r-
, �a 0
M w
Q� 2
0) = CL -0 C-) =M
cc E M m
cu
Q) E -0 w
D'
ca CU Co
-0
1-0 E
a)
.2
0 -o
0
r- -0-0
E u) ci 4 -M C)
-!C�o coBo-
am) so�
00-
-e5
U) n- cr- 0-
a) '(7)
0 1
�: EM
0 -C-- 0 M CRO: a)
75
15 -C�
m > -0 F- w 0 0
z
-5; Ef
0 -
E
m -ca
0.
a)
0) (D
-0 0
cmCS
In 5; m
0= -15 E
2 a) cp E E E
[2
2 =3
w
5-0
E
M u 2
-6 =
(D
2 E -:f 0)
m c_
-u a) M 0)
0� a)
cD CL a)
'in- -5 0
-0 0- 0) 0) -
M 5j
"I C C', E E
a o E
r- in (D
a)
-1--
2 b
m C)�
Cl
:j�� = L)
CU
.0 >
a)
R M m �m
CO �o > c: 0
.0
E (D
o
(D O -o
0 o
0 CL 2 :E
I M G) M
-I- M M
a)
< -0 M C),
0 C.) m
0 a)
-j 0)
< 0
< m
NCl?
00
a)
L?
0
(1)
0
W
C9
0
Q)
(D
CD
(D
(D
I (D
I
U
O
d
E O
fQ a
� C
OL
Ll N
� 0
C_ �
1E �r
O
Q C �
N O
m N o
n J
ca (D
X CD Q O
:D Z
OO N
c cn
c J U
c m
O '(n
M o
n
cu
a
Q
i
�, E
(Da)
U`
a�
a� E
O :=
o)
OF
ca E
Uo
ccp
E
'a
cc
N—
c
Q
.0
Cn
n -acn
n
'ONocv-O
N
Fa m
o-) 2
o)
O
m
O ca
O
m
ca
g
` —
o
o mcco
m
o
D
o
a` o
—
C -L o-0
n- o .n
CL o-0
a- o
a`
W
is
as
ca
m
T � p
v
@
v
>_
EF
EF1=
O
O
O
O
O
U)
O
cm
O
0)
O
CD
y LL-
cm aJ
m
m
c
c
c
m
a
0
In
0
m
m
a
m
m
m y
m
m
U
m
U
c
U
c
V
ca
U
m
U_
U
o
Qca-
ca-
ca-
n
¢
¢CL
ca
¢
¢
Q
Q
¢
¢
a)
0
a) a
0 maCQ)
Y
ai =3 O ai
c.>t6LD
a)
a
m E U
a_N)i m
-0>-o
am`v)
tL-
C
'o
E
L O Coa
m
a-
CLC —a-
•O
O)
6'0
2)
.
n M (O L
) •U
Q
¢
( O a) O N)
Fu
11.0
00
N
cn
ca
cu
v
O
m T andm>
c - i U
¢ O L
mO
-Q. ) O m
U N
a)U0Q
�oUOmn`C)
m
(
U
O
� E a)OO
N L m
NO
O N
(
ON
a a.ccca`Coaa)i
m 0cc
ai .E
m
o)>
m a) a
a)m >
n
o
¢io
E c0
-..oR.cCaNCa))
o
-o � °
a R
- m
) X= o
v m
i
a) a)oo o
`n
m
m
c m s
o E n
m
c m
m
oTo) o
a
m
oC'3
om
Em"
(1))
.
E cu
)
a
m o.- ac)
o
EW m
a) C)
n—m=
a o
o)
n3nmmU)
`-o
a) ca
-o
M�o
clu m o
= Q= m
o
0
0— LI-;; cU
E
o
Co
a) O_ , N
o
'm-o
n
p�
O Eoca n
0U
cz
Co
(1)) ai cE
U)
P)cm
O.O
CE
))
E
:E
Oa)�
O(Q) C m a
m C
Uo Cc
U
EE
aL
m co
a) •O Cl) U
-
O
ROUO '
T )a
J a
ca
EL
c) 76 C
a) na
O.m
N
C)
.UL - O
O "J mD>�OO-mm
EOL
E
`
NC Q)
(1) a) -) 0 -C O
L
dNCm
CD :3
OV"
M O R
m`
L
C
o
m 0
o a)E a)
O_Ca)
o 'C N O R mO O
mo2o
d
O
m N E
mmo
E m
U
oca)�
a m ax)
ac�m
mO
a)�m-TQ c,cu
"QN O y
aC
UN
QEte
O 'u
-Fu
cn
'0-o
)m
N
@-E
fl.0O'7 h
21
'd
a
)
=O>N
Ntop
O
O
c a)aNO
OU ONG, *5
EL
`
@pOm
0.
O
U N
U
NUa)
N
O Q
O N a) x-0
U= to Cr O� N—O
2
V
C.> R d)O E
E`aw
0 'D
R Om
0 ` p a
a zs N— m
> c0
OOE
OO
O `
O_
cu
Q
O L�
O '22 � v) O) ,- O
to O E U L .0 ca O `
a)
Cm
CL I-- (n V)
cm C
C O U C
U C
D O a)
0 a)
E U m
N
O
W O m m .n
Q U C
O .G U O U
(a T v) C
f0
a3 > 'O
O C
R_
T C C a7 (a L C
m 41 �O R
"@ m m m
C p' O
d (a N
cu :3 cQ)
u0i -O .c
"N C
C
N O H O N
j @ O O =O Ncm
CL d.
N U O Cn m O `O d
C m C
m a7 (a
O U
o c U
C "D
'-
O
- 07 O (a N
is .� s "a`> a
U d N= a7 R V d E
x ch o= U c>a c>a R U_
-E m C
..cn m
rn c- m .� O N N N
`m ¢> c a3i o= a)
`O
�' Ca a)
E 3@
•o
E
m 4) .� O
E
Q' 0 = (D E 3
a) c N � .L c.) U O � �
� .-. to
o
E a) � O "> "� � U �
°) m �) �a W
Q) O 'O
d m m
m � N
� v) �
Foo n cca Cmc
tcoa
¢ m am) E o 2
Q � � � > ax) ax) � cca a)
� o
w � ami c) ¢
�
O
CV
CY3
m
�
CJ
QOj
(D
N
CJ
co
_
(D
CD
C7
i
E
�0
c:,-
o.
cu ca -
cu
=3O)
cu
:3O)
0)
= 0')
U)
U) cul
ul G
V7=
E2
E2
.2 E2
CD
O_ m�o
-2 0)
co
m
m
m
—0
-
0
76
76
7
0O
HE
EFE VE
0
0
0
0
0
U
C:
a) cn
=30
CO
wa)
0
0
10
W 'Fu 3: 2
-E5
ca m a
0 m -0
E I-- -c5 .2
m a)
CD
a) co Cl! F= 2
CL
:S E w
0 o c:
cL ca
-a a) (D -lw-- c=u CL M
2
E 0 0 rr-
0—
OO EJ
E ED 3:
-4 _0
C\4 —
'ON—a)
CC
(5 0 a) m -0 0
0-
_6 r
_L _
M w 0 a
15 0 O)o 0 0 0 0
0— CZ
W
O-z�o w E -0 L U,
m
C5 .9)
C:,)
=
co 0 LD w m cf)
E '6 = a) -6
0 m
C�- � =W u)' EQ-) -COD
0)
M 0
— = -:5 J -H m -- 0- m � -0 = -0 --
0) C3 -- wa)
Z5 0 0 ca
5 2 U=
0) > w o 0 -- a) zs
-si 2 m
_0 CL 5: =
'La
�5 (D 0
.
m CU 0 M 0
co cc 01-
W in o 0
'm co
-6 6 2 oo
rtw- (3:
m n —
(1) 2,1 E COD
0 W
— w [� .-
m 0-0 0 W
M ,
t5,5 W
0
2 -5 .-
�b "
=3
P 0"�5 0 E a)
-0
M ID 0 0 m E
a) N> —
0 0- 0-0.00-
mc
-0 CL -0 0
m P . W= E
Co m M
°n
UcO
m a) tr--
m c ow
co 0 Z5 0 ',u
0
'Ey
C3 -a3: w
E -E u) E
'15 - m 0 2
CU -D 0
a)
- 15 0 'Z :2
u
3: 'u
I_ -
> Z5 r-
a) 2
0 CL ¢o
0- 'M
E
2 — U)
w cm a) 0a-
m 0 m a)
E 0 E
U) 0
-0
2 w
(D 0� cz 0 � w
2 0
cm co m a) B
o U) CL
-0 - = 3:
m 15
>
*t — cz 'o CU
w E u ID -0
W
, co -0
M �oo -55 E F
-n
CZ
[2
0 2 0 :t --
0 a)
0 -ra
cz
�51 Co m
6.9
�D -15 cm
.2
m E E w o-,), w 0 -c5
C:
(D 0
n E IS Z5 -o
W
6 2 E
-0 45 aj
> cy) =
w cn Ef
0 E 0
(D
j� 2 = g- 12 E
m o
0 E
- w -
co .2 (n•
— m
'-n 0
Tp
o 0 T 0 a' E
u
a)
> 0
005
0 -00 C) C:r
0- .- Ln p
o 0 0 '=), 2
- u — C:,- z
-6
-0 E- E Z
0 0 0 CL - cu -
-6
r 0 =3 -0 E
- -=
M 0 0 't --
0 m
E
15
CL)
L)
-o C:, -',n >
2
=3
2 2 'En S'
E
= Cl: W 3: 2: =3 M -F5
T.- -E Cf) m
E `m 0)
LL E. -
0
-F, a E
in
-0 '15 0- W
Z5
CO " -0 -r, 0
C:
CL Z
— = - 0
co -Fu
wc _2
><-ao — 2 w
�2 -0.,=
C�u n 0- � X- = r- a)
-0
t o = 0 -0
C\�
0 cl
(D w t3 9
0 > ui E
E a) ,
0 < 'o o (, —
3: c-- cn
Q- E
.2(-) -0 E
0 M C) (1) cu
>
a) -7ffi
—
Ln
> W - —
0S
o = ,C-
0 m
a) L Z (-, 75
0) Cl -0 (1) 1 ' =
w E L) cu m En
0 .2 .272
-.;,- > q o m E M m
- '6 1
CL E (n � f >
on- — 0 0
0-1
—
>
c m
c,a E
m
= -2
m E 0
= U) 0 M -0 -0
w o c) cn
L) m (n
0-0
'm 2 (0 a)
cu
2
C�-
U) E
`2 a) w E
F -L-- c) a)
-00
m In 0
— I p'
a) Z5
Qo a E a-, in
lu -52 !:-: L ,
=0
u-
< LL 'n =��
2 a,
-c;5
—ic
2 2
-= Cl)
0 (D m In -E
3.
w -' I -o ((D,
-a.�= -L- =3
.2 ca tt- a) 0-2
0
00 w 6
M 0
vin o- a) 0
a) cl) ma)
0- w 3 -6 E c," 0
w 5; M a)
-0
0 E
— 0
2
a E =3 C-- "o-0 =, 0 C�, cu
:. o 0 -,LD a) m N-2 cp m
i�
't
0 2 -5
co E
w
`c=3 c'
2 cp .1
-
C, =,
w
W 0
T -2 0) c=u ccoy
>
S; 72 _0 m m ("v
E W
E >
—
0 EL
m Z;) m ID w
C', 0
r- -a m
W 0
ol
0-
-0 -0 E 0
m
C�L
0 C:'
E 2
o =3 o a) o CL
cz co w 0 o 2 o m
-a' 2
0 cl-
< c,
EL 8
z cu CD
m
< Am-
_0
N
co
cu
m
A)
O
n
c
E 0
ku —
M
0) C:
0 C))
U)
O)o
a)
C:
O
0
m�NCD
a N
N Mo
W U) 6
Z) z
0 -0 a)
-E C/)
0 M
C)
C:
.Q) U)
:3
M
0
cn 0)
U)
L
cn a
U) -0
p Fu
a) E
0)
—0 o,
—0
0
0
0)
ui
C15
Q
0) cn
15
CL
41
0
0 a _0
0 E -2 a) a)
U
m Cl)
n
0,5
S; a)
-0 (D cn
a) TGo
5 ow
ac)
E
Z5 �o u) - 15
C: ZD 0 0
C, C-)
cu = o m = - .=
(OD 2 a) - o V
a) a
,
cu .2)
cn
(n O)o
0 a)
CL E m
"5 w E
co -o
a) cL o
w U)
a 0 m m m
a) -`
a)
E
cu)) O -o
cL (D
D- cR — >
-o 2 a)
> ID
a) CL
E
(D
a. .- o
o—
a) IF L�
a) 2
a > E
m Ln cu a -FD a) -0
o
0 a
.>
�5 cm
- E
a) M
0
,5 2 -c6 E a) G>
c)
c,
a �: E� c>
a
•-az o
;-- -o
0 cu
cf�
2 o m
C -D
'o 0 CoL
�5
0 .(n
-
U)
cu
m 0 o 2 = 0 0 0) cm
a c
a) .1
wo I
oc)
a 0
:E5 -
.22 0
d) E
cu -i
E o --o
=03
E
Fn
:� m 0
C, CD
Z5
0 �2 a
o in o a)
-o a a M
= o
Ca
a--
a) a
-C-- Co
C,)=
— o
(D C" 0 a)
O 0 E o-
(D f)
15
-o In
�E a a)
o �B
(n w co� -a m 0-
m :E; 75 CL
w.m
(D
cn
>a,
E EL So coo 0
S, CL
IL .0
0 m 0
E E E
0 E
a) 0
CD -
E
w uo)
m
a C,
E cay) 0 CL
co CL
, E2
on
a (D
0 m
cL m CD Z-
6
Z5 C, a)
-�o
o M
2 a) a) =cu ac) 0 C�
00 cn
(D 16 0
u cu
;5 CL
(3) m —= to 0
b a
— cu
(1)00
-S -,5
m a)
Q-_) 0. - -
---o—
In W -0 W -'e 0
T
cn —
0
a >,.2) >,
M
75 2 � a) L
o -U) 0 0 o > a)
EO m
a.)
:�;
c" cn
ICD o a)
d ca
a cu o) -o 0
a) cn m
a cn
E
0
'D
0 .0)
cc ao) S) co� 'o a) m
76
a)
cc LO a
c-) o _a) E D -Fn (OD
<
E -0
E E 2 cu Ln A --
LU
E -(oD
a -w
o cL
(D - 0
a) E Ic-o 8) a
0 0 o. -Qo)
E .0
cu
?: 0 a
0 E (D ID
a 'o
a) a o) m
E
.0 a)
w
W
�2
=3 E w
w
om a)
in
y0 V
v)
6- —E -a E
0
o
0-0 E E o
E
CEL 'B� MM
o 80
(D a
0 cu a)
-o
_o 0
-0 oa)
M 9 2 E
M
a,
E o m
cou t5 crn- v) .0 M 0
-0 a) a) a
-�
cu u
2
>@ -iR
ol - C,
0 2 ca a
0 >a<)
u
cT
a) E- (n
a) -o
Q n'(D E a) .2 a m
- cu —
0 ID
a)
- E ccj)�
M V; .2- c,
'15 — a *F
— E
0
2
a) m
�5 *§ -2
L -c cD
O -C 0
60- — 0
cL M" 0 M 0
(D
.,2-
-o
0 0 o (D
E =3 a E rj
u)
a) �;
0 cm
cn
(D .2)
m cu
J am -oo `55 �co E
of -2i
-5;
m coo -a
.2
cu m a)
a nj,Ln
?= -o
in —
'in
q
(D cv
0
E o
E cc cc co 0 a)
2
g
m0
m
-c E
w E
4= o
mo
CL (D
2 -00 cu.)
Z5 E a cl)
- M
N w o
cD (D = -a
-
-Fu
0)
U)
L) -o cu 0 <
-2 m
E U) o.
cl a -o
06) o -
0 CO cu Co �:-- a
(D , —
L) O 0 0 ru
(D
r5
76 m a oo
c) =; — .-
cu 0 c� EL. ILI Z w
E 0
2 E- 15 EL 2
cL =3
_a cu
> L c_,
E 2
2
m c6 0
c)
C 7a 'o ' 0 a Co
o ca, = �>
-a
a) cn
6 ou
(D
aL cu
cL (D tn-
e15 FD
=Zn
Z5 Ci.
2 E Cj M ID u) p d7
0- c- 0- c-4 cl
c) c,3 L 6) E < -5 cu
f-
cu U)
K
IT
0
0
0
cu 0-
>
0 @2
E -t5
> cz
E
CL (D
[a_ Q)
E
0- a) E
co
cu
Q
O 'N
0 = 0-
0
(D
>
�w
>
>
(D
(D
cu _0
EQ)
L:
ca-
E 0 0
-15,
(D
ca.
0
E Z
(D
=
Z
> Q)
E >
0
m
o 0 2
0 C)
w
0 0
w
cz
O
CL
<
11-0 a) UJ E 0)
2 L6
cu
0) E
-5 F S� w 2
a) C:>
2
S2
M _j (D U)
(D —a) ui om E
0 i c@' E
(D 0 < 0 w 0
-R
E
�:
_0
�R Co (D a) 0
(T) E (D >
'a (D
-0
15 - -
�5 o
sz- 0 E OR
-0
0
j
-0 -
6
C", CD -ru -,,5 D
< C',
En C)
M—
cu 0)
a) -FD 0 , , g -0
=3 CL Cn _0
(D
o !2
cn 0
0
Q> 1-- 0 0
o m -0.2
(D
a)
C/) -0-5 E
a 0
0
--
.� a) a) 0
E -0 E 0
=
'ru 0
(D a) 2 FE 2
- — = G
0) (D Co 0 0.2
C)
0
0
E- E
a) :3 CU W a) ID -0
CT 0 c
0
0) _0
_,
-E C ,
LO En W wm 2
(D
o
.2-
=
a) cu =3
m (D _0
— Q) '(D E 'mn
_15D
(D _a CL
M
M . :S _5
0 M CD
0 _c_-
cu a: E o 6 0
M Z5 < 6) -
00. t 0 2
ul -,5
cn
-co
a) 0 0 -c-- t-
t6 ::' cD (b o CD -0 0
15 2
75
O= w co 0)
0)�B 0 �FL -0 U) (D Z (2 r- b 0
> Ca
CT 0) 's; C', (D
= a) u -0
M Q) -F, c� m 'n (D
(D =)
a 0
>
2 0
2 0-'Eii 72 u 0) CD - - a) -0
E; co 6 m - �= " 0 �o 'o
0� CL
M
In u CO = - (D E iE :2
"� 0 W CO ID n
M S2 -Fu -C, :�z 0- a) -U5
—co cw
��: C: o o
o n �a R-0 --o
z; cc -10D o
= U) C)
E
(D
E
= (n C,4 W
C)
'n i5 w C- = . 0 E -ru
a')
- 2
E u I-- cu ZD .2 0)::: a) 0
0
<
= In .12 0 a) cu (D 0
m co �f — a) —
:s - w _0 Z:5 (D =
-�5 -:,- 002
C5,3;
-'U--)
CCj
G) 0 (D (D Om -0
-0
-
CL
CD
CU 0 a)
.o C to M (IL) 0 (D (�D _0
C U) > M 0 =3
'a)
.0
0 (D n 0 0) 0 0
m �2 in > - c
a)
<
(D
M a) - 'FD C2 - - CU
cl- -F m 0 - s-- M C) 0- 1
5 E > 0 -
ro
CD- (D - 3 0- a'
(D Z EP -a; 3: 6 �6
8,15 -0 2 -o m E
cL ir �2 w 2;
-S2
cu o
U)
0
0 o 10, Lu -
(n a) -6 d)
�2 0- f Z5
.2
a) -0, -0 m E- Ln C3 (D
-0
C 0 0 'E m
-0 'n
0 m
G)
-5:
- E --F, c,� ��Q 6 !2 W
I
c5 m - (D cj 0 0 Q) "E
E o
a) 10 Q) cm: CL 0) 0 E m 00-
(n
= E E o cu
E a) cD o (D cu
(D
oo--
U)
E m '5; m -E E cu
Cl) 15 U,
0-
75
0 C)f
a,
o
CL 70 0 M -Z= -0 2 CU
0 --t, 0
- - m 2.-
a) =
a)
D-
m co 1 =1 'S 0
0 CL E 0'- a) Q
> ID 0 0 m
Cl CL
cu
L15
0- E
'm
0 0 0 0) m 3�: ca i= 0
a) a) E
E
CL C,
m
(D co r-
_0 E cL 0) Z5 P =
0- Q) E W -E! F
'o
=
cr -L--
o-
-0 c> E- 0
m -0 cc�,, 0 2 -0 0 o :t --
-2
2
M _0 872 E T) C)
_0 -2 E -0 m
W 3�.U
a)
�5 a)
cin co
(D _0 cu
(1)
= -Z;) 0 (1) (1) a) a) 0
�5
L- -�5 C) a)
:,
>
E 0 0 'o -
:2 0
(1) a
-, w
O C� -0 a)
-f
C" =
US S "0
E CO a) o
E 6 , �j
C
CLCL
1E m
m -2
E
P E o®
N
C?
z
Z
I
O'
m
E o
(d -
� C
O p�
a N
0)
C �
O •� N
a c
N O M
m N o
J
L m mo
ui ) Z
.2-0 N
:E C N
0 )
c c
(0 O
O
Q
L
3 �
5 N
,Go
N
O !L
0)"
c t
c
m U
-o
O c
O
E
CZ
E o
CL
o
C,
c
o mu
m
co o
m
o c
0
m �
U
CO O
U) N
.o 2
o
C O
2
a
C
O C
V O
O U
u
O tts
_
E
C
"u. N
c -
O _m
O
U
2 cu
N U
C a
V
a)
m c �
aa) c O m
> a,y ¢� o
o
a)
E - U
o c`a o O co 0
c
>. N U O 'O
-O m6 O m O
o c v> 0 o E E
C5 O
mms
ma
L m E n m
c = o
o)L m m > = o
Q n Co (D .c mT -
mn@ •E O E a) �.�
m N co
-, W p �" a) O U (v
6 o L E 9-9
c _m C
n o E m6 C 0 CD E U
api coc -c-
C E o
rn mn O E �"' O •O
o C L) 2 N C U 75
C
>,15 (D O "O O
Ca
_ CL C L
m Co O
U U_ T3 a) O N c C
a) c c -o > a) my 2
0 o E o p C d
N -C O D U
O .0 ..� 2 O
-O C0 U p) O O O
� O C (D .. N a a
t° o C
c a U L o-- c c
p> in a) F- C N O C
U O p COvi ,O cD U L
C U ') �o m aa)) 2 c
C13 a) ID .0 in v
O C
m m o o E 0=F -C -)C
c
O
cu
C '00
o cO `-" o cl
m
a`n) cca
O V O U
E In
Nd p U O
LL
c
aci m0)
its = -0 O mm a)
'O m C 0. L E
O QN O p
O
mn �O n
Cm OC a)) C
c -,
U a) E "X
O LL O O N 0
»T. O Q) C
C > C C X
o= a) O O C O
0
ate) U o` E E o
C N Ga
U C p C p
ID
p) � o co -
c p mn v
E Q c a) a) .O O
O U O O Q)
CM C O O
G p) m 3 p m
Q=3 O "O ..T
a)U aE)� o
O �O La, O V -OO
m CM E c a) o c m
c m
Q) p Q O y 0o C
O U
O -3 O, O E O
�aoC`.C,a°)a-
O E
Co y= O c o
a5oo m a) o c o E
E i c a)
o co a) S o o c c
U � a) o o O
O m> N T a, N o@ m
O -p a
cu . c
c .� o a) = 3 ate)
Q a) `o a E 3 0 M cn
c
:C a) n c ' o E
F a`� of cu 3 c E o >
cnn mn L p 'O O m� 0 o a)
C U O ` = T m4 a) O O c9
co 3 m - E n n U m
C& m a) a) p Y .O E c
cM O c n. c @ o O
p co mn 0) (1) l� 0 0 ci a)U
a n• C O a`) a) 3 a) O O
o c �_ c>o @ _0 cu E m o- cn n mcv
E (n L L C E U- "� Q) .� ,C
CU
namCn) xC°O' ) p cm
C O C p E mO acO)0
ao •3
Eoo p
4O VCniC9 LC
a.G .
IL - ca
O OQO
)
C-
f«c@oO
CoO Oc6 NOcn
E a aa OE
`-C =L=� S, :F-- .O
cn
cO C 5
CC9 cGQ•p� mm O a
o QiE m C
oC "Ocno cCUIn O rEO o =2CiOC -F;o CN
a)EnO_ >NONN O 2
0m cu M Cl CL
I
LO
E
Q)
U) C:
0)
co
co
0
ca_
cc (D
EE (D
0
•E
0 *
U-
E 0-
0)
=
E 2 2
a) 0
> (D a)
=3 0
co 0
0 0
C) 0 n C/)
0-
Ck-
CL
OJ U
0
'0
=
-Ima CU
co E 0
-S� 'o E 275 0 avi
OL ca.:=-
E (D (D
-6 —
L) 0 -5 In
E o -0
a" E cn c
'�; .2 CD E
a) uw, Y,
, - a) 5: CO C --
:�:
Fn
_0 cw 0
cu — 0
w o cu c = -D =.; CT) 0 -r
> 0 2
c
t -2-
75
0 07 0 .. E- '=
C3) CD (-
= a) Q) CU
m o =
O.
0 m , (v
"I = =
- -
�G 0) m cu =3 w c �o = co 0
� 0 E
Z3
-0 CL 0) �:: r--
cD
E o•S; 6 _0
E a>) w
< w -0 .2 cL CL
0 -0 W a) -
(D
ui (u
cm P = u
a D
O)o 0 cc
cu cm Ow ma =m a) E G) 6 t--.2 "�5 2
-5 -�5
2 c,
w 0 w . C',
E 0 co —
.5 0 2-2.2
F- --1 F- — :s = 5 0 o mw
(D SD S -Fu -0 u.) -0
0 -o -a
00 2
80 cm _I_-
,P s' -q LO, w
(D a)
.2
W E 2
= D 0
2 M;
E E w �5 w w 8 w
.2
.2 0 w
0 m 2
w
0 (D
..t;
u_ cn a) c_ a)
cu c
g
'Fo co a)
a) cu
-0 m C" 0
M
E
>, 2
�D
co cu (D
-2 c-- a- 2 E
o
`OE
C�L 0
IOD
CY) j� c2.
E a)
o w E a) a) o
Q) 0 'Y,
0-0 0 cn w E5 0
E
-ffi
.275
-5 0) 0 -0 0
-t
() _2 = b �5 ui Ej E -.S
a- 0 U- C, C" U
M a)
0 cu w 0 (D m 2
= .— w W C�L —
coo E S; . S, �3;
-0 -0 cz 'EL —
, 0- -F LU = .(n -0 (D
10, 'm 2
-0
�5 cn 0 c 75- 0 9 2
0 a)
CL 0
-6 ,D
S)
c lb
w o
0 0— 'u -6 E -o
0 00 E E 8
2 cL
m c= S, E
ca a) ED-
0
E D
U- -f; (D V) a, E a5 w a
_ p
a) _0 ca
w 2 (3 LLJ LD 0
E
cmDcac
M 1r)
2 -c-- CT 0
�;_
(D (D _O -0 .— M CU x u� u)
cL 0 '15 E Ew=o
0 a) cL
0 w
0--�O'E`
S
'Fn m6 -0
0 u,) 2-9 a) 0
'ED
0 0 (15' OL
M
0 'Q- cu w
a) cu
cu m m "LD T E w ED F, m
r.- -2 u' 2 E E 2,) 2
o co
T a) -r,
0 - :3
3: 6 a) 0�
M W
a.)
E > 2 a)
a4 cl -a
.2 _2 Z5
F (D 92,
p
_S
--O-S E
E 0
E
0_ a) 0 a)
a)
U cL Z�.E- , 0 w C �2
w E2 (1)
C 0 m 0 -6 U5 i' -
0 CL 2� CD m .5: U)
12 cm
'�5
E 5 2 0 w
- CO �;-- = C:
= LE 0
u a)
0 0 M,21
-6 0
T -o
17, 0
5, co
10-- =0
0 70 co Ln M
m = m -05 2 (D.0 0 ac-
o 0) U) -
'E
cu 0 a) -
0 2 2
t= �a 2 Z;3
uj 0 a)
.��z
E E E�G= S.
E
0 E U- 0
E (D a) 0.0 > - -C�
:5
-r 0
0-Z5 -0
CL
0 E
Q Fn E-
E E 0 <
> a) E
o < c:j
0
< 0 U) OL
0)
N 0
C?
0 CD
-0
:3
=3 _c_-
a -
I
LO
L)
0
E 0
0 0)
0)
-E
0
Q C:
O 0
N —(D
-F
X 0)
W c
Z) z
0 -0 (D
'E
0
o
.2
o
T
�5; (D
n
co
'0
I
E
75 co M
ca cc
>
o
= a
E CL
> E -a.
2
CL
co
=3
cn
2 c=
0- 0a)
m -,Fn
CL.2 a)
CL.Cn E
ca
-0
M 5; E
a)
co >
z a)
0 ca-
>
0 -0 — >
Z 2
2
0
cc
in (n C-
E
0.= CD
co
CL o
CL cu
CL m
-
>1 a) 0
CIO
a)
a)
a)
(D
.E E
=, a'"
E -2 P tl--
0
cm
C
_0
Q) 2
>
Em
Cpl
C) a) . 0 C/)
=3
U
CU
cc
co
cu
cu
W 0
0 Co =
-0 0
m 0
C� =
d)
(n
W
cy
C W -c-- =3 CL Em c/5
a :� — 0- 75
0) (D '2
E o
m z) *t CD
�= a) ca
(n
tt= 0
0)
2
-FU j-- a) D_ 0 o o=r =i
E
CU -0 ID 0 a) -C-- 0
Cl- M Ff C: 0 A)„2
C: =
>' '-: M Co
Fn m
E2 (o o 1= a, cu
w E O= =—
cu 2- E a) a) -2 -o @)
(D
21 -Lm 2 0
_0 -c 0- 0
-c>B ', - '-- '
- �2, -
2 0- 'D
ca.
m- co
a)
0 (D -0 -2 =3 m C= 0)0)
w -2 Q) 0) E 0
S (S. - -
0 2 — cn C-)
8- co 0) a) 0
-0
CL
2 w a) 0
5 8- 2- �3 ma
- (D CU
>
C;5 It w =
c-, — 6
CU
- =
0-0.- -0
co tt-- E
:> 0 m 0 a) E
o — E
o I m
X co cn Col
3 cn X Q) cL ow L 2- -�ffi
EL w E
a)
0 -ru
a) In
OL c- � �= 75 Ci
m a) a)
co
c�
-0 (D— _0 w
0_ a) (D u) a) =1 70 a
w w w E — cu
6- - .2 CL
2 <D
Co CU 0- Mn
co _6 a)
E ED
E E E B a)
CL w F=
m cr.c- CD
to N a)
n
CL •0
("D
2 o 0
a)
0 :S N w -o
m
'15 a) m 0 —m
to a) D ID �o CL (D 0
L
.2 In 0
m - -Tb C
5n;
0 0 m cr
D (D ED
ID --r-
'a)
w
0 -�-u w
0 -0 :s ca
'n 47-
:E5 2 '6 (D
— �o
.2
01- In —Fv a) (D
(D
• 2: -05 E
2 N to a -0 cn=
OCL
2-
6) 0 E -0
0 m U) 0 ” w = CL
0 in cq �g
E EOF -p o- cj ai
0 = 0 0 0
0 0 -
� E 'c -:L -0 '- M �S :=
c-, 0
MC ';2 CO)
0� -0 CC
2 a) cn
cu )
-2 z, -a m
m �= cu E E c_u '15 >_,:o Q) -
m 2) a) CL Cl C" > C-4
— -i co 0
a) -0 a)
coC(D
—
ca 0) Co
-e-u a) _Z5
C L Co (D a)
= cn (D -f-- -c E co: 75 E
0 C) -2
-r--
i-5 C� 0
C: (D 0)-o > CC a)
ro--
cu
a) w
Co
LIJ 0— -2 2-0 a) m E C,
C�, - -- *5 Z c - •-2
0 o -Fu 3: *Z
0 E = ::, 0 CD a) CO
E a) 2 E cD c:)-
-�
E� - U)
E P
= a) E 2
In -0 C) -2 a)
cm cy) w 0 :D >
N
-Fu
L.�5 05 cn -5 ;R --L a)
0 Wl 0 04
M a) m
E,c
ca a) a)
-0 -0 A� 0 Q -0 �o
— -0 E D- a -,
E �
0 2 e5 2 -C� CL
a) 2
a 3�:
a)
m W
E OL ui W
= - cu 0
E 3j O)o
cj3 m
.1 ca a)
w D
—W > '> c) '- -
o coCU
E o o
0)
2
-0 -2-0
M o
-1� m
2 E
12 0 E
m
'a U .2
T_0
0 .2 o
0 M m w w a) (D r- (n m 0
C-0
cu 0 a) — To 'Fv 0
cu (D
(ca'
m E cu co
0 w o E ct3 — >
cn U) EL 2 (D
cuO) =3
o E w — :t--
W a) cz w -2
-�
> E w
2 E
> ) -0 C> —
2 0 75
o- -= =3 -t5 =3
15 LO 2- C) a) =3 w 0 0 cr
c5 0 LIJ :S (D (D W 0 CL W _0
_E a) E
> m
c" 8 2
cl-a Z -0
2- cL -0 a)
>
2 a)
u) 0
m .92 6 ID C
a) E m
Ct-0- I- a- 0).
Fn 2:, 'c,,
.0
C
E 12 �6 - —
0 a) C, Co
W = (D 'U CL
E N
0 '� - L" -- -
co >
0 - 0 0
E Z5 0
0 c--) cu -- E
- =3
Lij CL U) cn
F- < 2 0 cz co 'o 2 i=- E
cu (D MA� E) a)
m 91- ai 0 ID cu =
2 a) _0
�2)
-2 0)• cn a)
0
c,
— , m E
-c: (D a
CL o a)
E -o -2 -o o
C',
-c- 1,12 ,
u) > co cu En
cu
a)
IT
C?
CL
I
I F- I
I
m
E
0
-ja co �5 C)
0 E
a) E
Q)
>
> E
0 "
ca-
0 —
a)
0-
cu
2 a)
cu
=3 0)
cu
=) 0)
=3
0-
0-,o 45 a E
U-) CL
en c
!E5
U) :E5
V) -0
Co .
�U)
Co
O's
U)
0
E2
.0 m
,o
E2 0
a- C13 ol c(u: ca=) 0- 0
-
L 0
(D
(D
a)
-E E
E oui
LU
Lli
a) 0
0 a)
0 n
C:
.2
CL
0-
ca-
CL
aoi
0
-Fu
.0
-
-5
1�C>
15 _0
>
0
L
m cu
E
E =3
E Q E CL
a) m =5
E 2
ID U)
(D
E 0- o 0 0 '�6 �O E
m
a. 2- Z5
�2 0 0
ci
0
-�D
0 m 0- E =
a) 0 a, - Qn, llC)
m
o)
cr
CD 0 2 Q. W 0
, .2 ED
—0
C:
> CT
Q) - - o 0, w o
N D- c- —
U., 181-
=I
w -5 �5 -,�5 2
'0 Z — Q) a CL c
0
Qu))
0 a) w w
_0 (/) CU .- E -Fn
m a)
0 - - 0 >�
a) m
a) 'n
- :-
�C-
0 (D — �: 0
_0 a) a) CD
0 CD
-L-- = mo
--�
J-
2
C t9
0 E -0 -0
.2 E
> a) 2
m 0
E =
a) CD
= w a) E
0 a) aN) E– 0 0
0 0- m
0 E 2
E C cDn 075 cu
0 , cf c o
-5 -,o >:
cL -0
CFU
0 70 0 cm
0) E . 'E-
m Cs E
E
y aSL ) ,
Q) .0 0 U)
U) Cx 0
_ m
-
Cu C= .- cu -R - -
LU E -LI) 0 .0
-
cu 0
o c 0
Lu (n a)
G 0 -00
0 M Cu Cnn 0 CU 0 0 Ft:: 0�
0 'n
o
E 0 0 m
CL
0
0' 0 a E
Z5 CL
a) m -J 2
cL'E a -0 (D 0) E
c)
m ca-
0 w 2 w 0 M
m 0 o w
a) 75 >1 0 �2 (D
RL C7)
CO -0 (D n, C)
(D
a)
C:
L) W
C) -0 0 on i�;
I
---: -Fz
E -,'D--
c
0 -0
N u .?: —
E - --!5 '- 3:
E 'n cl 0 (D 0
a �:-
C U CU CM w Q) =0
F= a) w 1--
r.
�O E -m= --m
Ln 0
'ca- 8 -j= 0),Lu
a) E•(D n 0 - ' 2.2
Ca
16 C, 0
�--- 00 QUI
Z5 C:
=F 0 - ui
-0 -0
=
o, CL a)
- �o (D - Fn
(D -0 —D (1) w
-2 S
M m
0 0 0
S0 'S a) (3)
E cy) >,
E s-= w
Qo)� C�
-0, E 10
EZ- - -=5 CL E
C',
1- -2
H-, = 'n t=
M CU a) 7S V) E 58
cD a>) -?!'
�o
-0 0 -F- o 0-6 w a, .. C) -1--
ID 0
0
-c-- 23) -& m -2
W — a) E
U
cc 10 2
n
u(D) n
0
0 w < . =
0 c-, , Z
-0 cn U�
cn -6 -
_j
a) -
I-
0 (v =
FD
a) 2
C>
'15
m a 2 u) 0
0 i6 m -
> U) a) 0 (D a
2 (D w cu m E a) 0)
o E - 0
--ffi
Q) -= a) cm a)
CL 0) b3 S'-,
' ' E C.*
-0-1-- a) Lm W C,
.2
-0 >
0
0 a) E = -
-J2
(D E2
U �D (D a)
aM
D 0 - 1- 0
Co N G0E
'S V2, o -64
o :S
> o
2
cu 2 -.2 a)
w
5_7 F'- 21 E 2
'15 (a5 -6,
l)
cu (D E 7FD - (D
0 0
=E M
CD- C' M
rr w o 0
LU cn -
a) 21 0-
:u0
w m 2" 0 0
Cr 0
�0; ID 0 >' CC
n rr- —
(D
0) �L--a)
:
-E
a) o) EL a) E
- -0
- En -iD -0
> c
Q) CL 0 ID 0 —
(D w
0 C
m --c) M -0 (D =
a) E a) -0
:f
CZ Fq 0,
w
-1- 0 =
0-
0
2 cD - -S� cD 0
cu E 0 m
0 -0 = -6 -t:,
0(5 w o
0 a)
E
�z .2
2 0 ccn- 0 0
0 cl
tl= .22 -0j F- 0
CL o E 0
0 cu a) a3 =
2 = ` -t-- w
�=3 '0
O.Si
= = m
'nE2 .
0 a) t= (D =0
ca
0
:s �-- U) F) (D
w Cn E
U?
co
r
m
Of
I
E
70
o E2
o co
—0
w
2-
<5
ca
0
0-
0-
Q) cf) -
co =3
co S
0 - - L. 2 �a .2 =1
cu - - u)
0- 0
0 0
M 'a = o , (D -5
0 0 tF > ��,L nc
cz > c2
'cc , -0 E
E co
- o o IS a) 2 ---o
L =
o :3
0 Eu�-=— E ;T, t a)
co2)
-E2E 2 a
M 0 cr
-Fu 0 to
a)
cm
-S cc)
:5 cm 7a
cz ou (8) -0
O
cu
-
- (1) cu
:3 o u)
cc a)
U—
-Lu �5 co
— c- Qo)
76 cu
0 c u' m>
0 a) o m
a
0 a c 0 'n
-t-- N -c -
.L -
a E 0 0 0 om
CL a)
cu 'T :�� w, �,
2
'o 0 -E
-- tN
cl, U, -6 0 --6
co
2
o -S
ca 0 E -. ao) -0 E
cc m.o
0 0
0 ID - Cl.-
u < 0 cu
E 0
w m �a o 0 0 E;
- D 0 Ci
c_� a) u) E co
-o
-o
(D G) j5 w
cml- > E c -o
Q) a lu :a n cu cu
E w c=�,
, cc��
m) .tf o
-o o cu ca o,
O c,
-,.a
w ca) aul)
-m -cc,--, JR =3 0
cn cu 'a-)
0 cu
a) o E —
o) c� a) -ao) 2)
a) w a E-- 5 co (D (n
(5 cz :3 (D
a) m o >>, -S M-
'F= m E.2 -- E 0
0 F- S2 o -6 tt--
cl
0 E
R Q)
-6L
03
0 a) 0 15 E
M < >
0 0 0
'6
a) oo u) CF CL
3:
co - m .2 CD
2, E-: E -F,3 -o
-Q) 'Z J� -- - A?
p E o -ru cp L6
a, 2 w
2 �o -0 = cn 0 _o
ca. — co 1 E
co, (3 0 cc 0
0 �2 0 75 u E
2
0� lu -
m -FD 2 a) cl- 2
-o p .2 w c, 2 a)
IL -o 'a 0 -
> a)
a)
�o a) cL 0 a, E
c6 o 3L
:S cu cu
c?
Of
I