HomeMy WebLinkAboutRE_ EXTERNAL_ Fwd_ Canyon Loop Trail Project_ Intervention Request (2)CAUTION: This message originated outside of our City of Diamond Bar network.
**Please exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.**
Please refer to my notes below in blue. For the bioswale comment, I would see if Dick has anything to add in on the design side. My comments for that one are more general overall as
I’m not as well versed in all the locations of each feature on site and the reasonings behind why they were placed there. We do utilize cobble and gabion structures within restoration
sites though and the reg agencies have been fine with it, so I don’t think there is really an issue here with it as well. I’m not sure of the timeline you need to respond to her letter,
but if there is a meeting with CDFW on site next week I would recommend holding until then. That way you can add in their concurrence as well.
Since I’ll be out starting next week, Ryan P. can assist with any additional questions you might have.
Thanks,
Anisha
-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Wright <RWright@DiamondBarCA.Gov>
Sent: Thursday, November 3, 2022 4:46 PM
To: Malik, Anisha <Anisha.Malik@mbakerintl.com>; Winkleman, Ryan <Ryan.Winkleman@mbakerintl.com>
Cc: Richard Fisher (rfisher@rfaland.com) <rfisher@rfaland.com>; Ashimine, Alan <aashimine@mbakerintl.com>; Phaneuf, Ryan <Ryan.Phaneuf@mbakerintl.com>
Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Fwd: Canyon Loop Trail Project, Intervention Request
Thanks Anisha. You are correct on all points.
I think her personal preference is for bioswales rather than cobble stones swales.
-----Original Message-----
From: Malik, Anisha <Anisha.Malik@mbakerintl.com <mailto:Anisha.Malik@mbakerintl.com> >
Sent: Thursday, November 3, 2022 4:42 PM
To: Winkleman, Ryan <Ryan.Winkleman@mbakerintl.com <mailto:Ryan.Winkleman@mbakerintl.com> >; Ryan Wright <RWright@DiamondBarCA.Gov <mailto:RWright@DiamondBarCA.Gov> >
Cc: Richard Fisher (rfisher@rfaland.com <mailto:rfisher@rfaland.com> ) <rfisher@rfaland.com <mailto:rfisher@rfaland.com> >; Ashimine, Alan <aashimine@mbakerintl.com <mailto:aashimine@mbakerintl.com>
>; Phaneuf, Ryan <Ryan.Phaneuf@mbakerintl.com <mailto:Ryan.Phaneuf@mbakerintl.com> >
Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Fwd: Canyon Loop Trail Project, Intervention Request
CAUTION: This message originated outside of our City of Diamond Bar network.
**Please exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.**
Hi Ryan,
I will work on response points for you on the items below and provide them to you tomorrow. It sounds like she's misunderstanding some items associated with the project. To confirm,
there's no permanent irrigation being installed, correct? My understanding is the pipes in place are solely for construction purposes and would be removed once complete. It's common
practice to have temporary irrigation lines as well within restoration projects, so the agencies wouldn't take issue to that either. Also, as I'm sure you've discussed with Ryan Winkleman,
we aren't impacting anything that would trigger a CDFW permit so we are set there.
During your call, did she mention where exactly she would want to see the bioswales? I'm curious if those comments are specific to the trail or more so in general for the area. I would
argue you are pushing for a watershed approach, especially with doing additional enhancement and restoration activities within the area instead of going off site to a mitigation bank.
Thanks,
Anisha
-----Original Message-----
From: Winkleman, Ryan <Ryan.Winkleman@mbakerintl.com <mailto:Ryan.Winkleman@mbakerintl.com> >
Sent: Thursday, November 3, 2022 3:55 PM
To: Ryan Wright <RWright@DiamondBarCA.Gov <mailto:RWright@DiamondBarCA.Gov> >; Malik, Anisha <Anisha.Malik@mbakerintl.com <mailto:Anisha.Malik@mbakerintl.com> >
Cc: Richard Fisher (rfisher@rfaland.com <mailto:rfisher@rfaland.com> ) <rfisher@rfaland.com <mailto:rfisher@rfaland.com> >; Ashimine, Alan <aashimine@mbakerintl.com <mailto:aashimine@mbakerintl.com>
>; Phaneuf, Ryan <Ryan.Phaneuf@mbakerintl.com <mailto:Ryan.Phaneuf@mbakerintl.com> >
Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Fwd: Canyon Loop Trail Project, Intervention Request
Ryan,
I'm copying Anisha on this as I think this is more in her realm of expertise.
Ryan Winkleman | Project Manager/Senior Biologist/Certified Senior Ecologist
5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 500 | Santa Ana, CA 92707 | [O] 949-330-4115 | [M] (949) 533-0918 ryan.winkleman@mbakerintl.com <mailto:ryan.winkleman@mbakerintl.com> | www.mbakerintl.com
<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fwww.mbakerintl.com&c=E,1,dQmqLunp5RzlTkmlUIczvSZPVrAPG0iTrYmwfC3qzHsJAKlIge0z9KtIyFI2BeWBIT_G7fqKVoVs05XqC3hokNkIvdNLFrvkXxf2uuY99rLrUzjZltpVggQ,&
typo=1>
-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Wright <RWright@DiamondBarCA.Gov <mailto:RWright@DiamondBarCA.Gov> >
Sent: Thursday, November 3, 2022 3:46 PM
To: Richard Fisher (rfisher@rfaland.com <mailto:rfisher@rfaland.com> ) <rfisher@rfaland.com <mailto:rfisher@rfaland.com> >; Winkleman, Ryan <Ryan.Winkleman@mbakerintl.com <mailto:Ryan.Winkleman@mbake
rintl.com> >
Subject: EXTERNAL: Fwd: Canyon Loop Trail Project, Intervention Request
Good Afternoon,
Please provide your thoughts regarding the email below. If you would like to call tomorrow that will work as well.
Thanks
Ryan
________________________________
From: Cynthia Robin Smith <diamondbarbeautiful@gmail.com <mailto:diamondbarbeautiful@gmail.com> >
Sent: Thursday, November 3, 2022, 3:13 PM
To: Rwright@diamondbarca.gov <mailto:Rwright@diamondbarca.gov> <Rwright@diamondbarca.gov <mailto:Rwright@diamondbarca.gov> >
Subject: Canyon Loop Trail Project, Intervention Request
CAUTION: This message originated outside of our City of Diamond Bar network.
**Please exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.**
TO: Mr. Ryan Wright, Project Mgr.
City of Diamond Bar
Los Angeles County
RE: City of Diamond Bar, Canyon Loop Trail Project - Oversight
Dear Ryan,
I am grateful for the conversation we had on the phone this week. I hope this letter will clarify my concerns about this active project and that changes can be made before serious damage
is done.
I understand the Canyon Loop Trail construction project intends to install PVC drainage piping and a mechanical irrigation system in this sensitive natural habitat area. Also, I previously
informed you that the City's routine installation of cement and cobblestone gutters, tracing the trails, is inferior and causes erosion and soil degradation. This mechanically-engineered
system wastes water and will cause years of incremental degradation.
* The placement of PVC piping is only intended for the duration of construction and will be thoroughly removed following its completion. To avoid any detriment to the surrounding sensitive
habitats, we have daily biological monitors on site to oversee the construction team with both their activities and any staging that is occurring. Daily review also identifies any listed
species observed nearby so areas can be avoided.
* I don’t know the full extent of BMPs being used at all during construction, but depending on what’s in place that might be good to mention here as well.
* As a side note, it’s hard to quantify potential degradation without having a hydrological study being completed. I’m unaware of the level of flows the site receives during the wet
season, but I don’t see this project causing significant erosion to occur within the area.
Problems
These methods also violate CEQA and are an inferior mitigation for erosion and water management on watershed habitats.
* I haven’t looked into the full extent of the on site flows, but where are the drop off points are for gutters? I don’t think this would violate CEQA as we are not redirecting flow
paths or causing any impediments to the current drainage on site. The placement of the gutters are mainly to avoid flooding on the trails, correct? As long as we are not causing any
increased flow velocity with these structures (it sounds like we will more be doing the opposite) then I don’t see it as an issue for erosion. The slopes are all well vegetated surrounding
the trails as well, if they were more barren then I would be more concerned of erosion occurring.
* Also, the project would not cause any loss of water on site and would still allow for groundwater recharge and percolation.
Tradecraft Differences
The City's present choice of design is based on architectural engineering that is contrary to ecological land management practices and which do not support native vegetation, stormwater
management or watershed conditions.
PVC piping, manufactured hydration systems (sprinklers) and cement gutters will alter the (watershed) hydrology of the site, damaging the natural setting and increasing maintenance service
costs in future. Wasting water and budget resources.
* The project is intended to improve the current trail system while maintaining the multiple habitats found within our open space area. Construction practices have been discussed with
the US Department of Fish and Wildlife to promote the least amount of impacts to our existing vegetation. Additionally, we are restoring and enhancing additional areas nearby the trail
to meet requests of California Department of Fish and Wildlife and promote benefits to our local wildlife and watershed overall. In discussions with the agency, we chose to focus mitigation
funding on improving the habitats within our open space for our local coastal California gnatcatchers to utilize rather than funding mitigation banks at off-site locations. (I highlighted
this since it is an approach with an ecology first mindset, but I don’t want this to potentially open up more discussions with her, so you might want to leave it out.)
* Again, I’m not seeing where the sprinklers and cement gutters are on the design plans. Does she mean the trail water diverters? The existing native vegetation on site is not receiving
any supplemental irrigation, and the native habitats are well established that they will continue to receive natural rainfall and maintain themselves on their own. You could argue that
any minor diversions from portions of the trail that flood actually are helping avoid potential erosion occurring along the slopes naturally as well.
Guidance & Permits Required
I have spoken with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. They informed me the City has not contacted them for the proper guidance and permits associated with my complaints
here. (USGS maps indicate jurisdictional hydrological features in the project area.)
* During the design phase of the project, jurisdictional features were reviewed to avoid any potential direct or indirect impacts to waters. One jurisdictional drainage feature is situated
near the center of the Canyon Loop Trail survey area, in the canyon between the two trails that are being improved. The feature is ephemeral, likely carrying flows only during rain
events. It crosses the trail system twice but only as sheet flow, with no culvert passage evident under the trails. This drainage does not qualify as waters of the U.S. under the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, but you are correct in that it would still qualify as waters of the State under the regulatory authority of the Regional Water Quality Control Board and as
a jurisdictional streambed under the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. However, since no work will occur within the drainage feature, regulatory permits from these agencies
(such as the Section 1600 Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement) are not required.
* I included the Regional Board comment as well since it looks like she copied them on the email. A 401 certification wouldn’t be required for this. I believe CEQA outlined a Construction
General Permit and prepared SWPPP, so that would be the only thing the Regional Board would be tied in on.
* We are currently working with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife on our proposed enhancement and restoration of sensitive habitats in adjoining locations of the trail.
Additionally, we’ve coordinated with the US Fish and Wildlife Service to protect our sensitive species, such as the coastal California gnatcatcher. The project is compliant with all
CEQA requirements as well.
Solutions
There are better solutions for conserving water on site that coincide with best natural land management practices. Bio-swales and pocket "dams", which are permeable plant, compost, rock
and gravel formations are excellent mitigation improvements. Bio-swales capture rainfall, arrest the process of erosion by slowing water down when it flows across a slope. Any soil
that has been carried off from uphill is deposited in the bottom of the bio-swale reducing erosion, recharging groundwater and building soil. Bio-swales are a superior watershed management
strategy.
* Dick Fisher might be the best at providing more info on this one, since I think you could highlight some of the design choices that were made with the water components (swales, gabion
structures).
* I will say that while bioswales are an effective means of green infrastructure, but the cobblestone swales will offer similar benefits to slow water runoff and allow natural percolation
into the soil on site. Flows as we discussed earlier are also tied more to rainfall. So with that, the water source for plantings for a bioswale would be more tied to that. My understanding
is we want more grasses to be used within features like that, and I’m not sure how well those would even establish based on their location and the site hydrology.
* Also, she references the bioswales more to capture the hydrology from “uphill”, the only place that would make sense is on the west end of the trail. We wouldn’t want to make any changes
there due to the jurisdictional feature and other sensitive habitats within the surrounding area. The goal is to avoid any shifts in the existing hydrology of the site. She might just
be looking for additional improvements to tack on with the current project, but in this case I don’t think it makes sense to include.
* The improvements being made to the trail would reduce stormwater runoff and improve water quality , and the proposed structures would reduce soil erosion and loss of topsoil compared
to existing conditions.
A Request
On behalf of Diamond Bar residents, I again request the City of Diamond Bar perform a change-order to instead use a "watershed" supportive approach to drainage and irrigation on the
trail.
Please communicate to me your impression of this request and keep me informed of the progress of the Canyon Loop Trail project.
Thank you.
C. Robin Smith
Cynthia Robin Smith, Naturalist, Conservation Gardener, Teacher California Native Trees, Landscapes; Wildlife Habitat & Biodiversity Conservation Diamond Bar Preservation Foundation,
Conservation Consultant Conejo Ridge Native Garden, Outdoor Classroom, Director Diamond Bar - Pomona Valley Sierra Club, Angeles Chapter
324 S. Diamond Bar Blvd., #230
Diamond Bar CA 91765
951-675-6760 Mobile
CC: CDFW, Victoria Tang
Walnut Valley Water District, Director Hilden
Los Angeles Water Quality Control Board, Stormwater Management
蔡㋠�獰�떰굎洁ნ쌳䤠炏㈲킄㐺灡Ṑ癍眿硏祟絯潔藽䷠䆍鄉蕃齳齰ᭃ⻊鎁筀懀녫늠븀��芑瑿羯㮕낻웻釱淠䀋ꔉ뾆较꙱৽⻑枉쾅�뽿콽继翟惯䌴湣ꞡꝰ骰�䙐ꅃ爨惂隽䂂ꂥ톴芎訩뽟澋횓꾎뾏릈䍁羰僎野醗⾘㾙횓뽡肭쒞�ᾜ⾝㉐略襦ꃿ谿�꘠ｕ뾢쾣�ྔᾒ⾓㾔╺疘橢胘녺䕒炁䔀员剅䅎테炁睆腤䍰䄋퇖䱰潯�뽀�僁滷뉰쎂䤠ꁺꇙ훹勑帳堏抿嫟｜侸Ὗ⽠㽡佢彣擿敯晿厏哯囿옏뜏ﾏ龸꾹뾺쾻�ﾾ࿀쇿찟쏏옿씯왟ㅯ蓪�
韛夠惓쀄ꭽ牀ꃟ肵〈愊並ꩯ珱 ῑ쿋컿탿튏팯퐿핏홟ｯ翗还鿙ￆ鿜꿝俰쿡罏快翭濰鿯꿰㓼幉ଠ褐൱筠烡ႛ땳�暠ႛ遺�䦰뀊映戠퀋腷榠驠憰ဋဋ滓ꯡ所襢₠傴ࣿࢡ�넫ﴏꢢﾇ�念輐翷迸鿹꿺뿻ﳿ﷏ﻟዯŏᄏ̏Я＿缗缋輌漑꼣弛弓演ᗿᙿᣏ₿ᬏ⻟ｿ＝༟꼰罨蝩漪ἥ㼯⟿⠿⥏㝟⮿Ɀⶏ⺟ﾯ뼯켰�䰠摮龁澧ꡗ㵿곟㱁恈ݨ㴡≮삉µည蔺ꨏ⋘䂣骫旐摬㈾佦䏐怵䡻偙傳灌义⁋齌꽍끎ṽ䑽侱篐鐐峠晣ㇸ畜ꃠ澄
佒䆫�㟟䪏䂿簑㱰慠䂯轈곿妏ฯ塿悏㠏㧏［罡Ἶ⼿㽀佁彂䏿䑯浿‿穹箏粟粠ｰ潦ὡ㽫㽣佤彥齴柿桿榏檟殯沿淏滟귚끑徉齉轺뽋荑賿仿伏借儯褸勿叏䮩⾏꽖侂⽺�澅｛黻蔗圓ㄵ삆澆徖蠇躏魵䀤楄浡됉摐籂䌀⹁ｇ쾋�㾠䖡뾐쮑꓿ꇏ镄閟鵯韏颏馟ﾯ�쾯轾轶齷꽸㾱콺篿糟緯翿耏脟舯‿䑌捃聇楒䡣牐摮ぇㅈ儆鸨䰯爭ꊻ솀䂢Ä끇킄譤ﾏ羢辣澐ྦྷ俈㾔럻갟⦪ᾞ龜迎鿂쓿얿웏퓟좯쫿쬏찟뼯㿍俎澬羭辮嚚䡁浩怵䝥헱튱퇿迟鿓瑑慡ᗤ�
忖兯邏�崟錟뿯㿟俠￤濢䞚ॐ略葦覿＿痹Ὺ㿬ྎ⿿㿯俰鋿ͥ�켎쾱�ﾴྶ룿뤯뼿뮏ᥟ붟빿ᮏ䇏녰扵敪煣刁䔢聇塅偔仠ꉁ䝌䚀摷聇葃苐ꁹ⃠潌灯ⁱ犾煑假䈠끱灉៰≩刑煥痾쀵뼕漐缑輒鼓ᓿ⚯ᘟ៏ᣟ᧯᯿ᰏ༟⼝�﮿뼌扮灳ﯡ岉愧㌰▿☿ｏ弧漨缩輪鼫꼬뼭켮㨿み㧯㌿㐏쀟䅖さ䥔乏ቱ聕洠Ⓟ玐쁀魯ِ⍡솠潠瑵楳搞腊ꁜ偋䁲楃噴䭹ꗂ‵ᆡ鸞璠矲ꁊ�輹꽃꼻㳿㶿俏㽏䃯䋿䌏䐟Ｏ㽅但彇뼴켵�ཝ轎俿傟冯势
叏哟嗯埿缏콣㽚⽝彜潝鰪倪ꂄ胱聊硥捦郁聊慣恋ሤ彷䃕ヺ怢僤瑠楿쇰䨠⌠䪐䨀玠沐쇝欐뉴肄拾ⓠ垐聴偳ꃕ䱬晰#쑭甠肄潮勺爰탕聲Ὠ콢擿旯柿稏楏樯欿汏｟潭置软齰｝ཟὠྈ秿窏箟粯綿经翟胯ྂᾃ쾎㾅⾈徇澈䣴數ⳳᾓ쾍郿鋿鼏鑏锯阿靏顟ｯ羙辚龛ﾈྊᾋྭ辞鿿ꂟꆯꊿꏏꓟꗯꟿ缏ᾨ쾳㾪⾭徬澭ｉၴ쀢퀢뉍遊ヺ°⋟爐쏡 䨑昀녵"甪㋃해⁀偌浥䪽戀送⁸惱ᅍ⍰︀䭶얒眡쓠䳠티⍲眀⌮瑰偸偋햿䫐甀磠핐❀Ŋ�조碑
릡헰瓐좲䩰＠嗅胱烈ⅷቋꃂᏅ욷졂吠䃇怀Ůﱰ浲⇅應ၸ裂⎠얐읐䫠䯀ሤ샅뉴㈂䅷⁋怀쟣⃠㽑䴠灌쯉容몐פּ삧튙몍䦀쳱빓瑩䪀썐�揰聊멻쥠漑끲扷뉵뇃畲怠ሤ䱰쌐犠￠㇋ᅍ끍怆か샅懃⍻䯐渱凗愀⃗遍･⋈應愀准⁵$凗읿櫓⎀에씐쎀⊠犠䳟콰瘹�䪢眀送퇂쳿협쏱⋠�⏴瘄羱烈Ꮕ慊ホ老ꇟ⋚젧륐짰줁즠�앃鼠Ksᇌ汁烈麟�䦑眧지ﺰ툠澏鿓꿔뗕뇄�뮱现揜䩵쭀𥳐圃腶끲컿療�ퟀ몰�￡쉴㋠클古ᓚ냘쁊䪇䱰ﴠ䏰
䙄칗ﾃ偌틡㓬典凣ｍ뾲볿듟뗟뛯룿몏묯＿侼徽澾羿迀ﾮྰÿＯ㿹俺忻༇翽켅鿿꼀䐵၌뉴뇄셵臐惥䬀줰䨱⌑瓴휡玑ǘ㈗ᓚ왷응潀쏆냅ဤᥳ牰现퇿콰䭐홐䳑얠뼠臙叜捵菗ɷ胍４쇆ꌢ녵쇇ꋗ懢ꃎ탯쒀�憠⇈ך뀍柾닄苗䃙ド뉴㋘ᤰ䭰턐췰⇰灁懆痷瘡쳋搃ᇄ習㿧⼌헹憦ཤ케ᾒ瓑｠㇛創Ꮖ諠郆郏닢․큆爳䯀䰱枠爥䯿䳁䮠䮀윐쿑ｧ％ἐἈ⼉㼊伋⟿ᑿ㪟ዯᎿￏ⼁㼂伃弄켰佄Ｓ㗿㘏㜟㠯㤿㩏䙟
㰏콄鼾꼿㙋⩔瘡䪡ｿ⽅住佇彈潉齖轋齌䵿亯便像凟勯鳿䆬瓻즠愰뽛潖轠轘齙嫿枯峏巏廟忯懿戏？⽣㽤彀潁罂轵ཧὨ槿樯欿汏浟湯潿炏뾟佼뽲꽵�璁謭긂콏�ὀ䷑郠ｑ龀佻澅潽罾轿臿芯莿蓏藟蛯裿褏곁챆涠眳孟ꂘꥸ錼瞯㳇ワ煨ꃚ㵦Ỡ읰㪠⸲蟫浀ူÉᡵ⺐懜阢췛�擐鐍晢უ䋐䡻偙䖀䱒义⁋ꏳꗿ紂驽턐飰捜ㅦ�鬰ꢉ彏窤ྒྷ뾍ྡ䆖鈲憁雫黐柟犯긾깯踿Ｏ㾏侐徑澒羯辔龕꾖뚿頯듏髯鯯믿单脗鶇咰ᛠ獠慤湠�ꓑ㌁惥鄲₱㨳숵
傐멍ﾏ㾵徿德澸羹뿈龻꾼뷿뺿뿏샟쇯쏿吏ꠍ＠◫ꇞ큸御�鿎ﾡ�䃔⑄Ằ⫐䋐⃐䏰⹁왇ꔀꝏ～⾪㮫翢�迈�끿닿댏㬟킋쀤﹩ᙫ曐���ꝯ⑦꓃�ꞏ＿義忤쩥忸辭Ῠ鿰㿪﹟̿툯쩯쭯챿ﾏ鿍俿뿏쿐ῗ－࿕훣ဟ 捃懘ꀝ狚晆왁⡑㿱狶逝䈕ᝀ⒠⫀ﾯ뿵쿶輗濹翺´輄ૻ¿⥊⿱꿯⼢㼖輛ᥟᩯ⡿ᱏᶟắ᾿뿏�ༀἁ⼂䛭浩⤑♑▟⼳㼧铷慡딷Ｉ⯿꜏㵻勞⸿㪿䇱ﲿ뿏켱�鼸༶㟭呐略鹦㥯㨿㭏ꉟﾯᕍ뼽켾�羧콒�
埕䚟䝏䡟䥯䩿䮏ﾟ罝潢漅缆輇鼈꼉轞Ꮯฯ淿ᄿሟ漯䅯퇄扵敪앣刡䔢낝塅一ꉁ鵌䚰摷낝⥃艠�ₐ潌灯䃅犾釷䃇肝聍卉ៀ怕쁓畩励煥痾ꁙ彩ཤὥ⽦㽧棿祏檿歯汿涏溟澯྿콰羅篗彠扮灳信尩愧蜰硟租ｺོώ⽾㽿侀征澂躿萟貏蛟螯ꮿⲉ羒跿霯轏遏酟鹯鍿钏ﾟ꾕뾖쾗�ﾚ很澉諿걿鴿麿鿏ꃟꇯꏿ／ᾤ⾥㾦侧ﾲ澩徬辫걃뢟䤤洧吠瀀祚큕甦璱쀷쭳E䃃썉渂썫쌄Ｑ胞쁑僄냘刕쁑탭탁潢끏硥ᕰ睠玠旼뜮녏볿됟딟똯＿쿇徸澹羺辻龼꾽뾾뿿귏긯꼿핏잏
젏줟Ｏ㿊俋忌濍翎迏鿐俜튟햿풯헟鳯₈썗泑敬䁁發溱ᖀ⽠睓瞀䋰眑沰杯郂⽴ᅕᗭ呅ﾟ俛濥濝翞迟꿡뿢ﰟﺜ畈䅴쒀匠쓀�卄瞠䵰玀榰䁷耀ぶ䃷⥓숀慡䴑䎀⁁큟〷輷志濘站佛͝㤴㌭〳㐭ㅌ︱寰ݍ⠐܋⌱㗰瀇〭ㄹ㣾毷郵哸矽ꧾ轐븧嫽矢曫体彔潕ᰬ壿奏⽟ኆ寏ᠯ彯缏በﴃἊ⼋㼌逼能䁴獰⼺氯퇃佰ꁶ䁷t怏摵⁅ɶལ⽢牵㽬ɡ‽╂愳㈥ᕦᄣ⍷찎愦ŭ倅㵣ⱅⰱd浑䱱湵㕰删決歔ꃽ䥕挀発婓噐偁ぇ癩夰m晷
㍃穱獈䨠䭁䥬탬稰㤀瑋祉䥆2敂䉗呉䝟㜀煦噋噯ၳ㔰煘逧潨k歎癉乤䙌省歠硘㉦畵夀㤹䱲啲Ѻ婪샻噰杧ɑ璓灹㵯Ｑ꼏뼐噖传弡漢缣耤⓿◯⟿⠏⤟⨯⬿ⱏｖᔭ鼔ᩚ⼜狸伳⼘㼙㻿弿䊩䉟隷？⽆㿷俸忹濺翻迼鿽횯ѿՏ卟䗯䙯䝿ﾏ齈꽉뽊콋�ｎ꽚凿吟匏吿彏囟坯奿ￏཬ뽣뽛콜�⽩ཡ拿挟搯政晏束桯楿ﾏ齪㽻뽬콭�ｰི珿琟甯瘿腏磿聯窿齻▇逭係ဏ탭냬㷡䷠獥郁蛃｟ཱྀ⾋⾃㾄侅꾓澇羈觿誏讟貯趿軏鿟㨼붐耏釵ꀡ素☏悞繝㱩澙⼟㘒ꍒ䃤䓌
⑩슠擠魂̐䜮癯缭輮촑㳶㷟귪飵鏏ꙿ栛徤ꕧ㹺ﾲ쾲铿雿霏頟됯騏魏鱟罯뾺辞羹꾠뾡ᇭꥴ炣桔ဲㅳ祰亖䂪ꃫར ij䗠烇ᬲ㎐㐺胂﹐뽍뤟쏏믯볯뻿촏ｏ⿀㿁係心濄翅迆鿇�哜递捩푨햰ꃮ棠꘨೯믮䂫닝鄐ɰ擐漏갿�ᓿ꽏䁟쳿⿓䨛ꀈ⾶澥꿪뿞뽏忩濪㾵侶德쏻ꌻ옖鎣濽鿭꿻뿯⒭rท걿֬Ꮏ暰鼊潀㼐ῼ⿽렿ဏᙯ캟쾏킟톯꼑�ￕ弘Ῐ㿚�쥏甇橢ᄱ炣䑅员逯䅎ꍌ䙰睔ꍤ䍰ꥹ₠䳐潯쥰狐
ᆭ탋ヷ⟠쩢䥠택ꃊ槂敒畱낑
ᢏᦟᮿⳏ᷿＞༠ἡ⼢㼣伤뼸佼緿繟㩯ⲿⴿ⹏⽟はｿ輱鼲꼳뼴켵罁�㨯㬏䘟ꪣ漰烝晁⫽溁〩退뽅潀轊轂䏿䒟劯䙟䟏䣟䧯䯿⼏Ὄ⽍㽎๐懀衳ꍰ癀摩ぢ⡣쫠 桴ᆤ�僸来凝傑捧我蜰턎ꄩ탊潬倪㸳扐⃑扷ೠ₰왬٩揀漐挠炑Ⴐ궫ꥀ犐䂣捷愑イ瞎₭Ⴐ큥歲戠０쁥瀈 罗⽒作佔录囿橯塏妏媟宯岿巏�｟䃝ꀎ潳橯？㽴㽬佭彮罻罰轱齲珿璯疿盏矟蟯ꌌ肒ﾟ佻澅潽罾轿辌꾁뾂菿蓏藟蛯裿褏㬟㲟ﾯ뼽侚쾋�ﾎྐᾑ鋿錯鐿镏ꅟ霏驿饯ﾟ꾚㾦쾜�⾠澲
ᾪᾢꏿꐯꔿ꽏ꞏꡯꪏ꾫뾬쾭涿썟쑿륬／뾳��ﾷ뿆Ὰ⾻뱿봿빏뽟쁯셿튏䙌投浠鄨ݹ栀ѩ颰潒摢✐洠捩뼠뾯ἂ鿌㼄␊烏条䬠ꀆ摲懰⩵曠䁠੧ܒॏ�｟淝漌稍忡諝�迆Ὶᐿᕏ퀏좯즯쿊翮ￍ࿏ῐ⿑㿒퍿푏♟⩝⟁禠拐珰擨祡ꀀ扎擐䷰⨳נּ㋰⨲㍀㫨㌱큡ｯ濰翱迲�꿴뿵쿶�璘ﯿﰏ砟��큾睒楲慣昈ﲰ朮灢俞忟淠꼓똔ᡊᐿڵǿޯ（鼑㼒�弔漕编▏᧯⪿ᱏᷟ⋯쿩�Ｏ輋較鼄گㆿࠏয়ჯి㼏྿⼎㼏
烗扵敪掺ㇾ譃攠힐䱠ぐ烪쁹摲傲恢剆䥞샖ꁐ샖䙩勱旰畱⡥㯀㚿䁯ﾏ輸鼹꼺켼�＿䇿䈏䌟䐯긿꿯뇿堏ﾯ⽊㽋佌彍潎罏轐齑勿厯徿啯壟埏姿搏ﾟ⽛㽜轞콰罨罠轡齢揿涯旯曏柟棯櫿欏̟⽬쵽䅃呕佉乂䋾獩洠灉녳偹ⵯ⢑憠聈擆₃⃢楳荤瀑쁹흃禠劄萔䈠녹敮睴ゃ毼眮牯簟琿甿癏｟�罸轹齺꽻뽼콽�翿淯湏潟镯螟蠟褯＿侊律澌羍辎龏꾐徜鈟闏钿闯ꇿ⪄倪汊냥荳攐䡸掐芟莀☐䘡矱﹨촐₃ﹰ⠐枠茠ꊐ粀档낂샖邂ゃ€ᡬ捩굫깂満獫ﺏ䧠군懠汬
昒凖甠₯潮콷惗炫僥遈Ⴋ꾠鯿ꕟ鵿鹿龏늟ꇟꊿￏ�ﾥྦྷᾨ⾩辖龗飿삯늟댟됯딿뙏띟ｯ羸边龺꾻忇쾽뿀삋ᇿ伅䃾牍䙹⃀ⵗﺓ䟠훕﹀홧쭠욯큟졿쥿쪏ﾟ濙뿌쿍�࿒ΐ퓿섯슏쎟ﾟ꿬뿭쿮�ῴ‿쾄톅连㿙忣�ﱿ�ￏ�￥Ῠ迷鿸뼋ාໟᇿሏጟᐯ＿伕弖漗缘輙⁇邂䅾傭(灉ꁆ큈ｹ�迼꼆꿾뿿케？Ͽ؏ܟिୟｯ�뼭㼟传弡漢缣⓿▏⚟➯⢿㓏⩿ⷯ柟༭Ἦꐹ䕒酆忺읲䃗뽆埗䡏놰｀˗켸缳鼽鼵꼶뼷
彈㧿㫟㯯㷿㸏㼟䀯䄿ｏ꼮뼯켰ὖ齇꽈뽉콊䯿䳟䷯俿倏償尯叟㽖潕罖Ѣꭄ捐횀ﺒ愬嬯旟巿忿怏洟ｿ㽢佣彤潥罦轧齨꽩埿堏够笯氿涿滏濟ｰིέ⽴㽵佶ﾁ潸篯穟箏螟䤤炭傰굑斀畦쁅깦瑁걿곀䔠䘀궒검걳栐懎Ņ튑桰EႬ采ꯐ鋰旑ཽ刺遻鎰귐鐐ꬔ굀ꮐ鿀ꂬ끅쁅炮邈晩ꁃ浖ꁃᆒꭣ滀₮﹡Ṣ흠铀괣결䙠鎐ﾰ痗큄킑肭€႓껗갠갰拠Ⴌ鍭갠缐悝醑Ⴌ¬怞₮よႬ䆔鍤�耟ྋྃᾄ⾅㾆侇很澉諿譿貏趟躯粿鐟闯뾮㾠価徢澣群辥龦ꟿꢯꦿ뗏ꭿ듯긿
꼏？䞐瀞낝悒낻⎜콄饳쓒犰魵䔱鬁榖ọ斀჻傔潴뇇뇄馱倁䍖삞酅齮�楰색Μ鵡䚀촠놜鵩䔠槀홲鋱祳냄遥쟠铀鸔콐䂚聃力烉畴遅쁅鍽成聃熜₼ꁫ烖㡁獬흯遀鮰斐ﵶ芞饬쟀釀쪑ﮐ䐠鱵아䌓➁傔烗ꂚ쟿鿀젡銄䎄髁쨐Ẑﾀʜᮻ䂹Ҽ⟁姂ු䂼馹拠Ṣ접鍀柱ꂚ飽玡ꁄ냆ₛ튑䗿�铁큁鸑뱢鰰鴒＠ꂞ℞悞ꀝꊒኜÏ녅鷟醰鸁鋐캒哀飊쿵ⷠ퉧鸡큠쭱ﳵ慷ᇌ冔↑퓚䋛탟殐钡䍐쟁揀苓쯿�릺듟뺏뚯랯뢿ￏ�ﾻι⾿㿀俁싿꽟낿뇏＿俧忨濩翪迫
黬憑냄祒သ∽邝�㫁ゴ［擠郭ḭ瑦㔺瀴㭴⋾짭틿忾毿痱։炂污汶䟳ࠀ晰࠲읡鷀Ằᢀ㘳瑰瑸戢쀙㝢泚덩ᄊᇲ䌊敖｜技ἅ㒼酰펐馡泠ꂑƑ⏀㐴烺㑃騃掐怉濔쿽翸༗刺著ﭯٿ୰࣊�탗⼉㼊伋尌ؠැｏ弎漏ᳱ�胝ꆓ䂙旓䏿죁짲铅䕁케쟣탢ﵱ隑쵤튱웧鶗酡�ꂑ邞䇢䙯⪐ⷒ顯⧠璲Ɲ浯⣏顠�젴慐�쩰睑ꇜ냆퍩좃酁珒췿톰쫡쥀쳲컨�鋁￣憛킞끅삙ℒ샞ˋ䓿䌡醀⦠黲䍀钀적ｐꄮ悒肔슑뼔伔㟗욿醙逰飑釠鷐
潐턼釿쯑魀촔鰡쫱ㄳ쐱쾱쇞務熜捣脲컍䓀̵狏睥삐鿿ἰ馢㹰餤⇀철�ａ⃙냗冞눮拾섾ꄰ野ޝ쌰烐범ㇴ⽡숑追㼺뼸㧿䟊䮯♏ᬼԯ᩺ﵰＡ㈝⿼ヽ悑譇挄佈忿⓿┿协ﾯ缑輒༧忴濵篶⽇䷿敏柿ᤏ仏伯ﰿ䣿／ὔ⽕㼁伂弃漄轮輆᷿ࡿᾯ↟ಯ嫯孯ｿ潴齝꽞뽟�齉佧�蛿槯樿歏ᱟᷟ磯禿ￏ�⼢�ｾ漦㦔䃏龃慱⌯㈸㜱筢㧎킎랃냓湫〯⌫昞큰瀭酼씨䵂ｐ냝逭凛凊뇓쇈焫짷Ⳳ켺戠Òꇜ⁃퐲엽瞑焿ᾙ⮚䋚吨㿝浔烋䁊舭앧쓐翱僈苓ˇ䀫郎
샓ᇠ･냒ెᾅ龃潤Ὥ쾇�곿諯侟偯兿劏ꦟ潏ｏ쥕୲炏ﵲ⽗꽶羕鏯뱯됟耯暮脨偱僅釵戰惋脢銟菾慯｟潢忄ྪ龭澭㿊��꿿殏淿윏땯灿焿牏｟潳뿑轵뾺꽷辎龏꾐篿鋯뷯빿뾏膟숿쎯ᾧ羅迋Ὺ濌翍迎�賿路���鈟쾻쿦뇄㹁㙁⪱䒰ﴐွ齥㘰쐰ꇯꊿꃍ牰ꕲ煓㹵䅠ㇱ灀ﳯ䄡㗡⫑枰逫ጼ㰿⺲ꐀ㓐麡גּ梠칹ⵤ㗰䊆痀㕤鰱픯ꂗ鿼꿽⮚逼쀲懼䑷⣁⯲〲㜐ⵐﵰĩ⽦䌡㉰㘳䓒⣐ﾐ鄳灃֞㈫瀴키끃齿霖ڿܿ驏㟡㾄炱ⷭ櫰ぃ䇥鵡㉀ꓳ�샲惵ⅅ키怷㍯㱠Ｒℷ
ྨ鿧┻눼놣⯿䐲䃂읰죏ᨯᮏﾟ￭ﾰྲᾳ�꿒侶맿먏묟밯⎟얟컆꼜뼯漧쿭켞⼱⏿⒯▿⛏⟟⣯⫿⬏负밼ᅐ攠獭伶ヿ㯿㌟㐟㔯䈿㝿㡟罯缹輺鼻꼼뼽켾꽔炛逐醥ﭤ沁ꀌ„뀂怃뀁肛䕃빑ᡁ鼠ᣐ匢ꏱ暡ウᏯ䤠ꓰƐ柀됁ქዿ哦ࠂ鲰唐ሡ䦠䆀眀⎜䆠ɗ魳鵰ｰ抠ư现䜮䊟䱏䑯ｯ罅轆꽚꽈뽉콊�䷿俿倏Ⱏ⸿桏奯ｚཛྷὝ⽞㽟你彡鿓퓿햯횿ퟏ瓟��？忠꽧뽨콺鿤絛蘯ᐿ涿貯贿潏ﾟ꽰뽱俰忱⾀㾁鿵菿萿蕏寧觟Ȱ龑쿀㽪鼎괏瀃歯ꅘ낣
ꗻॱ昲ၷ、ꆘ썗ᐉꗯ૱ણః矔⒦턈㈉Ͻ灁섉z뀀臻턈嗭柲怂剘ി鼯ꀟ刐ꈗၫ矄倂塬ﾰ㱓놫ᒥᇼ恣쀁ᇯ૱Ơ械ᅕꘑዻ 榐퀄뉗䄊ᒢᏯ蟰α慀쀗腗隣剀厠셠地課ᒏ翿ᾊᔗԉ㖧㍔끷쀗ｬ退愓ꀂ傦끘Ċꁒᏻल瑁Ʋ僼醱ᅿꝰﮠͱɰ귒꼛溋揾䄘逐鎹킮鄉逓뀊ថং刢眱牀ᅵﭰ逋儋ਨΰˠ镐뭠�ꅩ궠ᜢꊀ涑ႈ倉ҿꝐꖶÐર⦢∉ǿ꣏꧟ჯ쁥귑吁뢂獳ꙵዔ닥珴瀃냽獠ﾴྶᔗ䍔醢ꈰ址妐堑좡놠ﾐ똋뒺邢凼ጉ䆿꓿싲畄뇀쎡꯶싔슑
셾ဋ湲ꅘ턉錓⺢忊濋㿙俚郿醏鈟鍟鑯长随ﾟ꾗뾘쾙�Ῠ翺僼ᄲꬦ볔哦bΐ조ﾐ숉ꚣ덖䁷˂㇎껿ꛁ쿳嚓늡呑ﴂ悰蝲ǡ횳獯훏｟濗ￚ缡⋿疯抏矩砶祏摛ｏῧ㼈伀꽪뽫濹踯迯ﯿﶏ珿ଯŏｿ꽢輊弆８缈載⼛늗뻠愀逄䐠惑哿埑돀䆀༯ᇏዏ４༖⼘㼙会弛᳟ᵯ兿匟뾑✡ì勷蜡劲榐肳⊣낯柾拈燒䊾艖烲邫ၗ샿칒嘰술矰쟰헀ꏢ냲툳쉾²륲螐⃭ꂢ恓ᅔ套ì炳⃀嚡ꮤ슠궱좓ﾠ燃耤邭뇲킾뛎퇲ꃫ
矻血洐ｖᅕ㡘셾퀪姂⅏⯏⏯⓯⛿✏？⼨㼩伪鼰漬ｉ輮鼯૿෯㿿叟䅟䏿／ὄ⽅㽆佇彈潉ὕ轋厏䷟亯媿偆䍖榞つꃫ脸晵儹쁳ꅱ检녹矂礰矟㵀삐冡핰毡灷肧쏿㣠덂랄쇧컳㴰ꌂ﹢㸨쌧无㞂릢뜀쎅廉ꃫ慤끷Ӄ愻㌵뻿례꼐ꇄ뻂숃룢ꊲ°ᄳ䂾걲㌰蜑矠�憢拀굗글䈸邤칤셱ｰ킿漿⽔佞佖彗潘罙嫿宏岟嶯庿忏惟懯彏潐网ﾁ罳轴齵꽶矿碿秏竟篯̀롶탱₲〺̻＋￤⾃붎齾숶俢忣腯艿钏㆟帴簸푂묱狰퀃㐴㑃ᰅ質
蟻ꕏꛟ觯訿譏＿信뾘쾙�迥�ﾞ㇏㌆满꾣㠐㝠ﱑ浩Ǭꄻ⋃닕눽提暿㨕̂溰湴슑淦ÿ㧭灰膻냱썢킰￠䃴뇏县ⅰ酲凃⇄
㥯滱줁䎐ㄿｵ愹㠹냱ꄻ샓⇄}猾냕郈뇔㊾돫单₽攐冏³댽倳졆债䈸멗撰Ⴑ倠䈷팁ς炰죡판냏䆹儹俊꾣盍㝿빑늢㍀燠㬃烘䆰鋷礡ꃫÑ芿割㳿涡㵖涰淠쵓뼷聨ꃔ悏㝢뜱몡㞄덑큧㍲畱臎냎썡쑟씓ﾥ냁쀵肱旋ꂡꅨ햯㺨뤨㖁汁ᾠ뼼ꜱŦ鐃ဴ正쓰ꄭ示Բ줏젌ﮟ꿉맊셉㿧숢㶘浱￠퓍턲凭儷䃴㇂ꂼĿ柾쑥偰㇌䒹⇌���谢�ￏ�ⲵ≫䞽㾾䊿莏붡�迶쿴�刺﨏 ퟄ㺈烀㗡퍑
ｙ뀳냌ꂷ煨儷と뫹榰ﹺ｟oſʏﾟ꼃뼄ꆃ�⼊㼋伌弍ﭿ敃ࢱ㙁ﾩဴ넹턽�２༔ᖏᘟᜯ茿暡ⵦ扫ﯿﳏᷟᲿ᷏ở`༡싗ጿ뼥켦�⧿⯿Ⰿ�⺯⾿⏏㽟Ἰ缱輲鼳㾟戼㺥扫ᦴ䤨첔똹ꂌ�뼷Ｕ�뼻켼㴿㻟㿯䇿䰏뭴杠ｨႱꁏၩ悻뿇漹彌䏿䜿䔟䙟啯䠟䦏䪟ﾯ뽋콌�ꡜㅮ憿炽䊸姹憱홰쁁신傒ﾏ齑�뽓齗�彦ཙ嫿嬟尯崿幏浟櫧룡ﴐ醡텧념�怰ᥠ꿀ﴀ惂摴敏湟朏瑿椟ﾟ꽪뽫콬潷ｯ낔扪쀈䈠撀�㈸㜱⮅灳⧱뫿偒앑홓풁펀췐
뺱ﳔ灵ꂼ냎邼뿢䄈珺⃥뵹侑菡輠准醹兠爩ﾯ뽳潼�꾊뾋소㊡㾍軿扏捿邊錯뗏ꪬ碟꼚소ꊬ౸細⾱삼郿鈋硡退ꧏ뒄銡襣לּ놌Â筶곮齠됏ﾍ龳꾴ᾜ쑸슏脆녺쁹⏈㐴㑃汻벶肙渿膐憛ꤰ／ྏᾐﾔ뾟蒘➡ﾖ駽⽯첞뾐쾜�삼晹뮉犰牧㩀㬰悒퀋⵰僆瑦㔺㓸瑰孻撛嶷徠ꈓ碥瀢쁮汱汶穿풐삀ꡱ샐牱葁㍁㘌ꄰ샀璀瑸䂂㝢꽽駪숐ꌡ籁˄参탋チꁸ｢⪡⾣㾤⾽徦澧羨侑鋿꽝컯콿놏닟돯ꇿyኙ꾿돀聢쇀쉏ﭟ濃範耠앰왟읯��ᩁ爀罀䦀꾩侁舱浛渠₄
敥ᦽ瞂넘肅싱郳牲빀祫ࢠ恡傰怠洠䆄߿ࢰ엀薒ᩱퟂឰ쀇恬现䓼徰怠ﻂᡴࢀ菠薡袑펀儈‿엑茐ᦰퟠ鄙턇燪蠠枀聲ᐚ≁惢藂恰鸠᧐ﮂ끠끱蕳ؓ燡翠ュК聿싥싱耭퓦筷ခڰ훁ﯠ낃챤鋏챿ﭐ犃煥憰셁爂﹀莱ۃﾱプ膄돥䁲ꁸ䁲鋰浾灲타ꇨ㓧勺奠䆇遺傹⁐ƺ犒ܱ虔昄竟蒠판蘀漓灁棩曃⁻ﱯ握ჹ莄泠癓楯傿萠ဗ窰蘰ᨂ揰킅筢ᤠ篓萠ﾑӹ숁䆆Ż谵뗿킟
೯폿霟飯髿／ᾛ弉쾷侞徟�꿝鿛�잯ꧏ᳟ฯ퀟퇟⼏ྴ⾶ἕ⼖㼗ᦟ⅟ᮯ᱿⢏䜕ɵ끠Ⅰ༞浡䨟✦᳨倠삆炇뇱敒ﭱ쀱炅❤⅏⳿␟┟Ｏ㼦㼷弨漩缪輫鼬꼭⾿䋏翌衰禁漠殮掆ꋰ̓榀쀊狪胗数Ĉ쁃㋦ﾭ䛡퇲돥摰先旾ﰆ�身˫끱釹惿蘒䎴䃭끱烽铭쇿Ă乡嬨燒ﻀ憢！ 烦픱싥酑⌵耆蟝挀瀃剐掆煭窰㾐怳⃨懺삃苤惨唨卨升ㇺ荰狀楁揲ᇪ樠낃ㅖ苿ϱ梁摹ぺ腱䅖䫿聆瑱ޤࠏ㴟�š煪ﵐ薑慰ႉ弼㟿䄏㤯㨯㬿彏㴟㹯ｿ輿齀꽁뽂콃�⼝Ὃ䳿
氯廟彟息慿抏掟ﾯ뽤콥徸澹羺辻龼役뻿햿삯ퟟ��엟氟？⽭㽿忉濊꾊⽚ὲ郿醯璿甏瘟픯혏茟ﾏ龄꾅忚꾇뾈쾉鿞枎䓾녖ԅꛧ煏ᇧ嚀墭Ƞȁ敀ɐΒ簘煉灚ቖ펨㍩偠ر䇸Ϫ凨湏轖끗几૿堰ı傐ꭒ＠慚ꋰ郸ↇえꃮѵ䰁 狐ǀ懓胠ꓺ䂌鎯ﾎ嫷蹯払胬煇揩矾僸匀䆪珽Ăꋫ꧷巡擀惨ያ�ΐᆀ䞀Š囁浐냯Ƣ省拻섁뽤璢狹ꀃ샸셔惨豉켱섃ä㊷蛩祳끻념뛿嘀띀뮀۔ﾀ玻胠퍓샣䂌聻苪偑叏갡Ꚓ駁⃢
饵凑슸臭䞬㗂䉈뉹덏둟ٕꪂ熣훿⹕썠쨘䇃㖻伐䍐惿ﾰ郹ფ탪胠銿낯胼賿ꦰ妣區ﳀ�臫퇹ꗅ猆Ｐᣃ⃨䃸₻胦桾惿㉏瀵X䍗絗Ꮺ앑侲챁驐圀䋼읯漜䱿ۂ쁈굖끻腝땭쏠缗ῆ⿇㿈嗶㽈佉坊ﱈ밐狱䃰ロȲ懁뛹犰є匳뇃걵ｎ䃰�ꙒϿᇷ놣醬2ꙫ۠⢐탮䥣뻱匄嶛̱ㇲ゚삊慌恇䩷턃�䅦퀲↺㏪ɧ⤣뉏鐵ۿૼ硯��銯ｯ侕弐漑缒輓ｹ奧篿粦綿棋膿ꁟ鸯̟ﾟ꿻律澌뼆翗还งཿჟ鏯睯
／弒俼忽佻彼ༀ罾漘胿膟芯馿骟鮯蚿ӿｏ鼑漆缇輈鼉뼩쿱⼑⿿タᏏᐟᔯ阿⇯饿／꼣뼤켥依켧�鼾簭䛳汱㥵偀푳횈ﾃ䉔⏡싐낺珣减䟟Ꙑ멀삂⭂炡畐꼟꓁먒뜀쬁⃡〴ㇾ醮逴䃠䉖䋪菏㲲ు⌂㈸㜱謌Ｙ윭僡ퟭ핐큖冽럏볰꿱䕰䝑쿀ﺐ꯰�헡�뫀•剐劳륔䇲퇫坓剐뙁뿁抷蓏煌ኤ펿ዥ｟忲蕜罂剆熱⯿䝰ຠ༟ㄯ屿嵿㒏ｏ張翸迹鿺彖８쿽輀ǿʟί㶿㻟旯⮏ⰟＯ꽀⼋㼌伍콚�⽞ὸ㋿㎟悯扏ᚿ痟晏ᨿ／Ἓ⼜㼝伞弟콩強輢㧿㩯㭿⚏泏涏
蚟澏콰��伯侐ﾗ佺彻糿㕯㚯㞿諏诟賯㳿�ﾎྐ�꾔떕캁Ｂ샤点ァ솺䊻Ꮑ䒯䙔쿒喐뢀灡뷿럀䎁뤁ｰ䃓哬뇌遏큾맻뜀扠⃓탧櫼뭯뭀䕂䠰쪔똷￣ꅇƄ퓚삺泜㽊佋乿鍁펀葀턑姱ꬑ唶叶㾭쉲뾠퍡阰Ｏ罕뾕镗톮悎ꇎ銮墱瓿츰鍙皐ﮀ惖릫륧䡑偠䟐皠퉔꺡櫑鏎탧ꅃｰ灢⃫텒㊫况摎슬�䐑뵬븏瘟繏駿ﾯ⿍㿎羜佡形潣罤鿊臿术梯袿ꜿꐏ鄏Ｏ⽳㽴濝忏㾚供濐潽绿罿횏흟��뿜쿝嗩鍓亐돐ﾏ㿣忭忥濦翧쿴鿩
꿪쑜톩슩蹴쁠䴆Ｃ憊₯놻憹惉ᅐ膱可剢鏁䆀槡Ⴁᒫ냝₀冹Ⴊᅃ멬菂䂵꽧凄慰⁈ꅍ䋲₵猭ႃꇇ䉑덿䕠결�䱏뿀⊙撈浡෯뾗醵⁔톩䃁ꑥႃ恑턉剴앐꽲ᐐ逌⍑偧亀䍀ꬠ傃钳슩炎⁈烆튬槴䡧榤郅䁎揇졪쥏著垿䢕蒐０腌灇邠懆偒뀚抰Ꮄ꺿댱僓꿐倐戂珮ぅ₫윆䢐듡�Ę잁採턟ꇇ셢䝀溡儠⁃ꍒ勿늰䵠⇰䣁ꪐ夠귒촐炨깦䛠痀呰옠뽱䇅ႡƯ鄇⊴뽢뿰邰셆ҴႲꔋ酌셤ኳ씟섔Å끒犃«瀕䧯
儐ـ뫴拂큌ぉኳ⏿죂琟ᣮᬏᰟ︯⋂⛱倀뗐ㄠڐ迳ଊꅏ憹祧冷鿴뿾뿶쿷�⼸﷿Ｏ?ŏɟ�ⵯ？⼮漷缸輹鼺꼻뼼㷿㻏臟芿菏蓟藯勿ｯᾈྟ㾊ᾡ⾢㾣美⽅䛿堿鉏鎿꣏捏ㆿ䭏Ｏ뽩콪Ὅ⽎㽏澞羟齜巿庯ꎿ悿憿拏柿빷뭄ᗐ먐ղᜱ杰퀱ࡿ⟱।ܒᣱࡂ데洒旷놐᷐濡劮₴䇅斮ꇁ䄈킱繉滢ပ秾入達뀒偼샒糿⍒곀돀狦뇰쎀新﹐뉨ܱ뗄ꦰ嗑࠰�⊴匔偿苇ନ쇄㾠뀗鄨愇悴탁爝⥳죿쬼冯桏ㄯ殯貏趟ﾯ彮鿑꿒뿓쿔侊ན潀䇿婿砟盯矟揯搏攟Ｏ㽦佧Ὁ
徢很美侎ꣿ餿洏邿佯ꔯ陯｟ὔ⽕㽖佗뾯潙轛狿獯瑿徏鯏鲟鶯麿ￏ�ﾡ쾊�辩Ὲ澪걿澏뢿燏뫟볿봏？ὶ᾿⿀쿄傄䄦珼荐♤⠡୳㓆ﬢ†ゴ⩦ୠᔐઠጐﾀ턅鄟瀕눤选耒Ḁ쎴所ꄓ倶䅿뀣�╳ձᠲ⌠诠缀偿䃓솅挠ႇｮ爥숫ᄞᇢ嘉鄴䇃씗킿绰蒠⎢߃⍕䙠㐢�苡♑捰ή❠鉲⬰㒒氢쀣끼ㄥ엿误얟᱿绕᷁⏆｠䚄怉耒ꢄ쀣耉셿ۿጂ緣ס⋤�蒶聀뿃酼듬㈥Ꮵ怉怣⁍ｐㄫㄵ䂦샐焦繂ᔲ粣❠１劄䄧戉Čをꀌ䗮⬅䧂쾢㠣ㄲ
ﴷᮤ퀹┗㛀ᴱ뾂⇢ė논盱ᕥﾠꇛ퇳Ð텻瀤䈥匧槾リ‣䀝툗Ῡ㿫㎏দ݃梒摹퀟⏿㘠ꖱꚟ좯ۿ߯迿羏�꾑뾒쾓�羰ﾖｶ隲ꮳბ鶴쾘侸ῗ࿕ឿྟ슯Ṏἀ뉀䏰ä槴╢∠㿃黔࿅ﾢ꓿Ἇןএࠟ◯ᖿ쭟ｿ་龭꾮０�ﾳ뗿ⴏ뜿ᘯ뤿큏턯툿ｏ辽返８༚Ἓ�⼞缟ÿ윏✟䔏➟⣯⫿촏ｿ迎鿏缸輹鼺�鼼콆៷䉏⁏䄱釨煿놄Ý乱莀�ﾶ㊀אּꊄ圄냯遽胻漠ꇹ偓殮㏼灵懚孬畟扜櫓㓼铮ꁀｬǰ셿撃쎀뇷ꃵ�纐网萢綔丒ﺀ花냝䃭ꇭｵ隆ｿ醃틴쇡卣
考考杦ᑘㇵ畤ꊄｪၿ瀱ǜꁀǤϣﯿ箰揲蒢�茢虰⎠￠삅轃ὃ䗬闶쌃綯綁�慑䃦葔鲱潧Ǥᅿ쇡癡樱箑槠ꃜ敳퀻翟婂艙匄놄㑼泏結簡䆑漀絫愱핬샠艽�蕠２ꀜ傀쇤垄僧腎ӽ檀㓞捳腵胿�摐췿罧轨狞逓⁽檠�掠Ꮑ掐乵蝰炬煟⍯ⲯ䝟／澊羋�켋�．�ጯᐿ䡏ᘏ豯募ￏ��뼛켜㽁쾝༡⋿蜟觿谏ꢟ꤯䠿赿ｿ辎꼫뼬澓羔Ｐ༲㏿뀟㖿㘿㝏也伿偏｟鼻澛龶龞龠潕࿂蛿ꤟ졿줏걯굿䮏ﾏ쾹꽍ﾻ�῀⿁嗿
씟瓋篲樢터羀홫ꍥ藱遗ꁫ釯㇟칲筏焵ꁵ댑腡蘃ᅼﱰ뎠ﾠ쁬䏷鳜鋥შ다舃쓿硰쏓糰琀ꏲ杷톺摻蕳虿욏？翊俊￫῍ྏᾐ釿鈯뜿넿闏靦颟馯쾚ῖ翴侤庥迭鼀챏꺯ɿﾯ뿷쿸�῾⿿Ǐɏ͟ѯտڏޟﾯ뼈켉�輖，Ἇ⼐囱ₕ敒ꃟ녤�輕ឯᦿ⟏ᬟᳯỿ뼏⼠㼡伢弣갲睏ᬀმo�磠䒑慩姻�䊑쇡ၶ牼し聿攠矀圀▐境䌳�㟢灍烟Żせ橡ﺵ쐭턠萀돓浐�瞠ၺꅭ輑�溠ሀ⋩�垳摑＾셳烾耩쉮끙ᅼ낟
ꅽ糟嫐㦀洠榤끹淿摢攵Ⲥ☿㇯⤏／Ἢ⼫伭弮漯缰輱㋿㎟㒯Ⴟᆿዏ囟䢯Ｏ㽉佊彋潌罍轎齏꽐兿嶿卯囟嗏埿戏傔돗羀淡⃞罩뻐ꉵ恼礠ტè싞䂄硓疓㦁�蒂攰뽰牭ꂖ鈻⇡镸ᅼ湧漲虸 偶䅽穌炐吠�繃䞅岟晟广彿悏ﾟ꽡뽢콣�ｦཨὩ櫿圯墏妟莯琏疏皟ﾯ뽷콸�ｻཽ쾉肿蠿芏荟�犗殀ꉭ瓿蠏鋏諯误跿踏輟Ｏ㾐侑徒澓羔辕龖ﾃ藿蘏ꠟ餯骯鮿鳏鷟ﾞྠᾡ⾢㾣徥꾭ꜧ뒏䌕┮潐ㄹ浓烦덨굏룿？ᾰ⾱㾲�徴澵羶辷룿릟몯뮿ꧏꨯꬿ쵏ﾟ᾿⿀㿁
係心濄翅迆쟿좟풯쩟췏첿췯뷿빕滀㯰뷠㣩什ꁀ淗㟐漀琀쀸㲡窠䙶䝴焸ꀼ쀸ｔ䀽ꄼ灲惱鄻䑡獒瀰㠀䲱䍳m总㭳圠恳灄慈¾僞쀹濏㟫킐⚪㥃䙂�䁁럁㈺⯥稷㡐䙧쁭䗯䛰產ャዥ旴䕪到怸녅엧㡡俀瑵牤泱泭獐쁄ꁬ큻�ￔ⧡緵⃙瀷はꇴ㞽ၬꁬュ㝖猀ぬ债楓ꀼ䁳쇴멵㡢䇀ㄼぬ㙃ﻰ䁰�펯�핿홿힏ﾟ濾뿙쿚�ῠय㏼퀲區삽稷䈠癬쀸㈣㏾韑꿽뿾쿿�＂ӿԏ؟ܯᄿ৯輌ᐗ稷䅃翪翐諑⃀ㄹ㘷ᘵဿ༛༓
ἔ⼕༦众弘漙ᨿᶟắㆿ㦜ꀵⴱ㜶㔵㛁䃏䷾ぬ⼫�ＯＧ༩⫿㠟Ⰿⴿ⹏⽟はㅿﾏ鼲꼳迎뼡켢콅伷弸㧿㩯㭿㲏㶟㺯㾿䃏㿟轌ｂὅ⽆喽㩃䞇䢟⎯䎫䙄꺀汖藺咑聲偧轋꽕꽍뽎콏�ｒ哿唏嘟圯堿奏䙟宿ﾯ뽜�ｱཱིὴ⽵㽶矿硏祟穯筿粏綟纯콿鰣渠惴還ﱿ忠蘿呂䠗攰惿檯拏描擟꾈ཧὨ⽩㽪佫彬潭滿潿膏苟韯颯馿髏ﾜྞᾟ⾠㾡侢徣꒟ꕯꙿꞏ⎟䲜ﱯ玐㛼璅畑⇧쓭婯漐Ǧ胨肋浡瞚莅鎰斀︰赴裏鉿誟讟貯놿ﾏ�ﾐྒᾓ⾔
㾕侖響꥟ꪯ뾿끏뇏닟돯ྵᾶ⾷㾸侹徺࿆羼뿿빯뾟쮯섿싏엟휯ｯ῏ῇ⿈㿉俊返濌動㠀臝냨鿠郝깐���챿㗜抂䃭㜲횱칂素⃬