Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/08/19977:00 P.M. South Coast Air Quality Management District Auditorium 21865 East Copley Drive Diamond Bar, California Chairman Vice Chairman Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Toe Rvzicka Don Schad Franklin Fong Mike Goldenberg Toe McManus Copies of staff reports or other written documentation relating to agenda items are on file in the Community Development Office, located at 21660 E. Copley Drive, Suite 190, and are available for public inspection. If you have questions regarding an agenda item, please call (909) 396 5676 during regular business hours. In an effort to comply with the requirements of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the City of Diamond Bar requires that any person in need of any type of special equipment, assistance or accomodation(s) in order to communicate at a City public meeting must inform the Community Development Department at (909),396 5676 a minimum of 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA Tuesday, July 8, 1997 Neal Resolution No. 97-10 CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: 1. ROLL CALL: COMMISSIONERS: Chairman Jce Ruzicka, Vice Chairman Don Schad, Mike Goldenberg, Franklin Fong, and Jce McManus 2. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is the time and place for the general public to address the members of the Planning Commission on any item that is within their jurisdiction, allowing the public an opportunity to speak on non-public hearing and non -agenda items. Please comnl a $r�akPr'c Card for the re:ording� rr a�mnl Lion of this form is voluntrv). There is a five minute maximum r;,.,e t;,,,;r �»l;en �ddres_c�ng the PlanningSommission. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following items listed on the consent calendar are considered routine and are approved by a single motion. Consent calendar items may be removed from the agenda by request of the Commission only: 3.1 Minutes of June 24, 1997 4. OLD BUSINESS: 4.1 Conditional Use Permit No. 92-9(1) and Development Review No. 97-3 is a request (Pursuant to Code Section 22.28.110.A.) to alter the existing telecommun- ication facility by adding a wall mounted microwave dish and enlarging the wall mounted cellular antennas. Property Location: 23555 Golden Springs Drive, Diamond Bar Property Owners: Carole Anderson, Torito Plaza Partnership, 23555 Golden Springs Drive, Suite A, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Applicant: AirTouch Cellular, 3 Park Plaza, Irvine, CA 92714 Environmental Assessment: The environmental evaluation shows that the proposed revisions to the originally approved telecommunication facility is categorically exempt, according to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, and guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15301 (b). E RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit No. 92-9_ (1) and Development Review No. 97-3, Findings of Fact and conditions of approval as listed within the attached resolution. 5. NEW BUSINESS: 5.1 DRAFT PARKS MASTER PLAN RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Commission comment upon the document as deemed appropriate. 6. PUBLIC HEARING: None 7. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: 8. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 9. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: CONCERTS IN THE PARK -July 9, 1997, 6:30 p.m. Sycamore Canyon Park, 22930 Golden Springs Drive - Doo Wah Riders - Country Western TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION - July 10, 1997 - 7:00 p.m., AQMD Board Hearing Room, 21865 E. Copley Drive. PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION - July 10, 1997, 7:00 p.m., - CITY-WIDE PARKS MASTER PLAN - Heritage Park Community Center, 2900 S. Brea Canyon Rd., Diamond Bar. CITY COUNCIL - July 15, 1997 - 6:30 p.m., AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Dr. CONCERTS IN THE PARK - July 16, 1997, 6:30 p.m. Sycamore Canyon Park, 22930 Golden Springs Drive - Dwight Kennedy's Dixie Kings - Dixieland PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION - July 24, 1997 - 7:00 p.m., AQMD Board Hearing Room, 21865 E. Copley Drive. 10. ADJOURNMENT: Tuesday, July 22, 1997 2 MIN MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 24, 1997 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Ruzicka called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. at the South Coast Air Quality Management Auditorium, 21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Vice Chairman Schad. ROLL CALL: Present: Chairman Ruzicka, Vice Chairman Schad, and Commissioner Goldenberg. Also Present: Acting Community Development Director Catherine Johnson and Assistant Planner Ann Lungu. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS -None CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Minutes of June 10, 1997. VC/Schad made a motion, seconded by C/Goldenberg to approve the minutes of June 10, 1997 as submitted. The motion was approved 3-0-2 with C/McManus and C/Fong absent. OLD BUSINESS - None NEW BUSINESS - None PUBLIC HEARING: 1. Development Review No. 97-5 is a request (pursuant to Code Section 22.72.02o.A.) to convert an end unit of an existing shopping center into a Taco Bell restaurant with a drive-thru isle and exterior and interior remodeling. Property Location: 218 Diamond Bar Boulevard, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Property Owners: Diamond Bar Associates, 4350 La Jolla Village Drive, San Diego, CA 92112-1233 Applicant: Peter Capriotti, Cotti Food Corporation, 25 Mauchly, #321, Irvine, CA 92618 JUNIE 241 1997 PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION AstP/Lunge presented the staff report. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review No. 97-5, Findings of Fact and conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. Applicant Peter Capriotti said he lived in Diamond Bar for about 10 years. He previously planned to construct a Taco Bell some years ago and has been searching for an appropriate site. He introduced architect, Fred Cook and Property Manager, Rick Bundy. The applicants responded to VC/Schad that no "as built" plans could be located for the building. In order to determine a demolition plan, seating and walls had to be removed to determine what was contained within the site. The surrounding pavement area in front of the Taco Bell unit to the video store, at the side and around the back of the end unit to the Von's loading ramp will be resurfaced. The outside rear overhead will be included in the overall cleanup program. Exterior building lighting will be activated to a greater extent than currently exists. Chair/Ruzicka opened the public hearing. There was no one present who wished to speak on this item. Chair/Ruzicka closed the public hearing. C/Goldenberg moved, VC/Schad seconded, to approve Development Review No. 97-5, Findings of Fact and conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. The motion was approved with the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Goldenberg, VC/Schad, Chair/Ruzicka NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Fong, McManus Mr. Cook responded to C/Goldenberg that anticipated opening date is September 1, 1997. Following discussion, the Commission concurred with staff s recommendation to agendize Conditional -Use Permit 92-9(1) revisions to AirTouch Cellular located at 23555 Golden Springs Lane for the July 8, 1997 meeting. JUNE 24, 1997 PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: Development Code Process Update. ACDD/Johnson presented the update. Stff processing men schedule the Planning Commission agree to a p g and time frame for the review of the Development Code. Following discussion, vC/Schad moved, C/Goldenberg seconded, to adopt staff's recommended Development eopm n Code review dates of July 29, August 51August and September 2, 1997, with meetings to commence at 6:00 and directed staff The motionule one urday meeting date was approved date staff deems appropriate. with the following Roll Call vote: COMMISSIONERS: VC/Schad, Goldenberg, AYES: Chair/Ruzicka NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Fong, McManus SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: In addition to the items listed, Chair/Ruzicka reminded the Commissioner's that the Concerts in the Park series of ten concerts begins on June 25. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to come before the Plannithe ng Commission, VC/Schad moved, C/Goldenberg seconded, to adjourn onJuly meeting. Chair/Ruzicka adjourned the meeting at 7:35 p. 8, 1997. Respectfully Submitted, Catherine JCommunity Development Acting Director Attest: Joe Ruzicka Chairman INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Chairman and Planning Commissioners 1 FROM: Ann J. Lungu, Associate Planner qj SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit No. 92-9(1) and Development Review No. 97-3 DATE: July 21 1997 The referenced project was presented to the Commission on May 13, 1997, At that time, the Commission opened the public hearing, closed the public hearing and tabled the project pending City sed moratorium for telecommunication Council action on a propo facilities. As the Commission knows, the City Council has been entertaining this moratorium since May 6, 1997. Due to the Permit Streamlining Act, the Commission must take action on the reference prof the July Sr 1997 Planning Commission meeting. The proposed project has not changed. Attached is the May 13, 1997 staff report, draft resolution and exhibits. Conditional Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Use Permit No. 92-9(1) and Development Review No. 97-3, Findings of Fact and conditions of approval as listed within the attached resolution. Attachments: 1, Staff Report date May 13, 1997; 2, Draft Resolution of Approval; and 30 Exhibit "A" dated May 13, 1997. aj 1 City of Diamond Bar PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 6.1 REPORT DATE: April 29, 1997 MEETING DATE: May 13, 1997 CASE/FILE NUMBER: Conditional Use Permit No. 92-9(1) and Development Review No. 97-3 APPLICATION REQUEST: Request to alter the existing telecommun- ication facility by adding a wall mounted microwave dish and en- larging the wall mounted cellular antennas. PROPERTY LOCATION: 23555 Golden Springs Drive PROPERTY OWNERS: Carole Anderson Torito Plaza Partnership 23555 Golden Springs Drive, Suite A, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 APPLICANT: AirTouch Cellular 3 Park Plaza Irvine, CA 92714 BACKGROUND: The property owner, Torito Plaza Partnership and applicant, AirTouch Cellular, are requesting to revise the original approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 92-9. The original approval (Planning Commission, November 23, 1992) permitted the installation of a telecommunication facility on an existing two story office/ commercial building located at 23555 Golden Springs Drive and cation identified as Torito Plaza. The approved telecommuni FA facility includes the following equipment: one wall mounted microwave dish, four feet in diameter and three whip antennas, each 15 feet tall, located on the north elevation; fourteen one foot by two feet exterior wall mounted directional cellular antennas, seven located on the north elevation and seven located on the east elevation; and four cellular antenna and the repeater unit located within a 665 square foot second floor office. Currently installed are eight of the fourteen exterior wall mounted cellular antennas, three whip antennas, a microwave dish, four interior cellular antennas and repeater unit. The .57 acre project site is developed with an 11,307 square foot two story office/retail building, parking and landscaping. The project site is in the Restricted Business (C-1) Zone. It has a General Plan Land Use designation of General Commercial (C). Generally, the following zones surround the subject site: to the north is the Single Family Residential -Minimum Lot Size 8,.000 Square Feet (R-1-8,000) Zone; to the south is the R-1-10,000 Zone; to the east is the C-1 Zone; and to the west is the Neighborhood Business -Billboard Exclusion (C-2-BE) Zone. ANALYSIS: Conditional Use Permit Pursuant to Code Section 22.28.110.A., this type of telecommuni- cations facility is permitted in the C-1-BE Zone with a Conditional Use Permit approved and review by the Planning Commission. Re- visions to the original grant require the Commission's review and approval. As a result, the proposed revisions are being presented to the Commission for review and approval. The applicant is requesting to revise the existing telecommuni- cation facility as follows: add a microwave dish, two feet in diameter, at the building's southeast corner; add three interior cellular antennas; and replace the existing eight exterior wall mounted directional antennas with larger (4.5 feet by 1 foot) antennas. Additionally, the applicant is requesting the privilege to alter all fourteen of the exterior antennas' sizes to 4.5 feet by 1 foot in the future, if necessary. This telecommunication facility serves Diamond Bar residents in the north and central portion of the City as well as freeway travelers. The facility's upgrading will allow the applicant to meet the added demand for capacity and better service. The facility is unmanned and will remain as such. It will continue to require twelve maintenance visits with one service vehicle per year. Therefore, the parking required, traffic generated by maintenance and upkeep is considered minimal and will not have a significant affect to the site or the City. 2 Develo ment Review that an 1g90), Section 22.72.020.A• states Ordinance No. 5 ( and all application for Development Review is required for any and institutional developments ect'soscope. commercial, wevery industrial, endin on the p j the level of review can change dep the existing Conditional Use the Commission is required to perform the Since the Commission is reviewing Permit's revision, Development Review* potential negative aesthetic impact, due to the existing belof The p proposed exterior changes, may mitigated the potential telecommunication equipment'sainted to some concern to adjacent land uses. Tuimment will be p impact, all new and existing exterior Add P ionally, existing trees match the office north buildings elevation and younger trees adjacent to the building act. Therefore, the adjacent to thesouth ents negative laesthetic impeventually assist in reducing the equipments visual impacts will be limited. The office/commercial building is maintained in a manner which does hborhood or create a health ndsafety not detract from the ants or general public. The parking and nuisance to its occare t in neat and clean conditions egetation• landscape areas are kept debris or dying landscape areas are free of weeds, watered and in healthy conditions round cover Foliage is trimmed, ,pruned , However, additional ground cover should be added where g no longer exists. Department The Building and Safety Division and the Public Works has reviewed the proposed project. Their recommendations are within the draft Resolution. Conc__ lus?°n ro osed telecommunication facility, even with the p p roved The existing act is changes, is less noticeable nTheonegative aestheticrimp facilities within the City. the equipment color, which will match the Office/ traffic and reduced by existing trees. Furthermore, commercial building ect are minimal. impacts related to the pro j ENVIRONMENTAL+ ASSESSMENT: The environmental evaluation shows that the proposed revisions to the originally approved telecommunication facility cacalAct according to the California Environmental Quality pursuant to exempt, idelines promulgated thereunder, p (CEQA) of 1970, and gu Section 15301 (b). fc3 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: Notice for this project was published in the Inland Valle Bulletin and the San Gabriel Valle Tribune on May 1, 1997. public hearing notices were mailed to approximately 218 property owners within a minimum 500 foot radius of the project site on April 29, 1997. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit No. 92.9 (1) and Development Review No. 97-3, Findings Of Fact and conditions of approval as listed within the attached resolution. FINDINGS: Conditional Use Permit 10 The proposed use will not be in substantial conflict with the adopted general plan. The proposed use, at the proposed location will not: a• Adversely affect the health, peace, comfort or welfare of Persons residing or working in the surrounding area; or b• Be materially detrimental to the use, enjoyment or valuation of property of other persons vicinity of the site; or located in the c• Jeopardize, endanger or otherwise constitute a menace to Public health, safety or general welfare. The proposed site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, landscaping and other development features prescribe by Code or as is otherwise required in order to integrate said use with the uses in the surround area. 4. The proposed site is adequately served: a• By highways or streets of sufficient width and improved as necessary to carry the kind and quantity of traffic such use would generate; and b, By other public or private service facilities as are required. Development Review 10 The design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with the applicable elements of the City's general Plan, design guidelines of the appropriate district, and any adopted architectural criteria for specialized area, such as designated historic districts, the area, specific plans, community plans, boulevards, or planned developments. 4 2. The design and layout of the proposed development will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. 3. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain the harmonious orderly and attractive development contemplated by the Development Review Ordinance and the city's general plan. The design of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture and color that will remain aesthetically appealing and will retain a reasonably adequate level of maintenance. The proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Prepared by: ✓ tnAJ L ssistant Planner Attachments: 1. Draft Resolution of Approval; 2. Resolution No. 92-28; and 3. Exhibit "A" - site plan and elevations dated May 13, 1997; and 4. Applications. A. 40* PLANNING COMMISSION 401> RESOLUTION NO. 97-XX 01 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 92-9 (1), DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. g7-3 AND CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION SECTION 15301(b), A REQUEST TO ALTER THE EXISTING TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITY LOCATED AT 23555 GOLDEN SPRINGS DRIVE, DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA. RECITALS. 1. The property owner, Torito Plaza Partnership and applicant, AirTouch Cellular, have filed an application for Conditional Use Permit No. 92-9(1) and Development Review No. 97-3. The application's request is to alter the existing telecommunication facility's equipment. The project site is located at 23555 Golden Springs Drive, Diamond Bar, Los Angeles County, California, as described above in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit and Development Review shall be referred to as the "Applica- tion". 2. Originally, the existing telecommunication facility was approved on November 23, 1992 by the Planning Commission. 3. On April 18, 1989, the City of Diamond Bar was established as a duly organized municipal corporation of the State of California. Thereafter, the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar adopted its Ordinance No. 14 (1990), thereby adopting the Los Angeles County Code as the ordinances of the City of Diamond Bar. Title 21 and 22 of the Los Angeles County Code contain the Development Code of the County of Los Angeles now currently applicable to development applications, including the subject Application, within the City of Diamond Bar. 4. Action was taken on the subject application as to the consistency with the General Plan. It has been determined that the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. 5. The Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar on May 13, 1997 conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Application. 6. Notification of the public hearing for this project has been made in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and Inland vallev Dailv Bulletin newspapers on May 1, 1997. Two- 1 hundred and eighteen property owners within a 500 f;9'_t radius of the project site were notified by mail on �pril 29, 1997. �� �. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: 1. This Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. The Planning Commission hereby determines that the project identified above in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, as amended, and the guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant Section 15301 (b) of Article 19 of Chapter 3 of Title 14 the California Code of Regulations. 3. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds and determines that, having considered the record as a whole including the findings set forth below, and changes and alterations which have been incorporated into and conditioned upon the proposed project set forth in the application, there is no evidence before this Planning Commission that the project proposed herein will have the potential of an adverse effect on wild life resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Based upon substantial evidence, this Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effects contained in Section 753.5 (d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 4. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein, this Planning Commission hereby finds as follows: (a) The project relates to a .57 acre site developed with an 11,307 square foot two story office/ commercial building, parking lot and landscaped areas. The project site is located at 23555 Golden Springs Drive, Diamond Bar, California. (b) The project site has a General Plan Land Use designation of General Commercial (C). It is within the Restricted Business (C-1) Zone. (c) Generally, the following zones surround the project site: to the north is the Single Family Residential - Minimum Lot Size 8,000 Square Feet (R-1-8,000) Zone; to the south is the R-1-10,000 Zone; to the east is the C-1 Zone; and to the west is the Neighborhood Business -Billboard Exclusion (C-2-BE) Zone. (d) The November 23, 1992 Planning Commission approval permits the installation of the follow telecommuni- cation equipment: one wall mounted microwave dish; four feet in diameter and three whip antennas, each `a �Vj 15 feet tall, located on the north elevation 4°4IL ur- teen one foot by two feet exterior wall mount eq directional cellular antennas, seven located on -h,664 north elevation and seven located on the east elevation; and four cellular antenna and the repeater unit located within a 665 square foot second floor office. (e) Currently installed are eight of the fourteen exterior wall mounted cellular antennas, three whip antennas, a microwave dish, four interior cellular antennas and repeater unit. (f) The applicant is requesting to revise the existing telecommunication facility's equipment as follows: add a microwave dish, two feet in diameter, at the building's southeast corner; add three interior cellular antennas; and replace the existing eight exterior wall mounted directional antennas with larger (4.5 feet by 1 foot) antennas. Additionally, the applicant is requesting the privilege to alter all fourteen of the exterior antennas' sizes to 4.5 feet by 1 foot in the future, if necessary. Conditional Use Permit Findings: (g) The proposed alteration of the existing telecommuni- cation equipment will not be is substantial conflict with the adopted general plan. The City's General Plan provides for regional, freeway oriented, and or community retail and service oriented commercial uses within the General Commercial (C) land use designation. The application's proposal alters an already approved grant which is a service oriented commercial use. As a service oriented commercial use, the telecommunication facility, even as altered is in compliance with the city's adopted General Plan. (h) The proposed equipment alterations, at the location proposed will not: (1) Adversely affect the health, peace, comfort or welfare of persons residing or working in the surrounding area, or (2) Be materially detrimental to the use, enjoyment or valuation of property of other persons located in the vicinity of the site, or (3) Jeopardize, endanger or otherwise constitute a menace to public health, safety or general welfare. The proposed equipment alterations allows for the existing telecommunications facility's upgrade in order to meet the added demand for capacity and better service. The use is permitted in the C-1 Zone with a Conditional Use Permit approval to ensure, by conditions and the issuance of City 3 Permits and inspections, that the project wil4'at adversely affect the health, peace, comfort or wb welfare of persons residing or working in the surrounding area. The previously mentioned safe- c ; guards will ensure that the proposed project will not jeopardies, endanger or otherwise constitute a menace to public health, safety or general welfare. Furthermore, the consensus of the scientific com- munity maintains that the radio frequency radiation emitted and the lower frequency electromagnetic fields associated with this type of facility does not produce adverse health effects in humans because they are non -ionizing in nature and normal exposures are controlled so as not to result in thermal effects. As such, the facility with its alterations will not be detrimental to the use, enjoyment or valuation of property or persons located in the vicinity of the project site. (i) The project site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, landscaping and other development features, or as is otherwise required in order to integrate said use in the surrounding area. The proposed equipment alterations does not require enlargement of the existing office/commercial structure. It does not create a demand for additional parking. The telecommunication facilityes original approved addressed this issue. At that time the site was found adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use and can still accommodate the use. (j) The project site is adequately served: (1) By highways or streets of sufficient width and improved as necessary to carry the kind and quantity of traffic such use would generate; and (2) By other public or private service facilities as are required. The project site is adequately served by Golden Springs Drive and Torito Lane which is a major highway and residential street respectively. The existing telecommunication facility is unmanned. It requires twelve maintenance visits with one service vehicle per year, as the facility exists and with the proposed alterations. Therefore, the facility, even with the proposed alterations does not significantly increase vehicular traffic to an from the site. Additionally, electrical service utilized by the facility exists at the site. It serves the site adequately and will continue to do so. Development Review Findings: The design and layout of the proposed ke development consistent with the applicable elements of the "° City's general plan, design guidelines of the appropriate district, and any adopted architectural criteria for specialized area, such as designated historic districts, the area, specific plans, community plans, boulevards, or planned developments. Pursuant to the General Plan, the existing telecom- munication facility is a service oriented commercial use which the General Plan allows within the General Commercial (C) land use designation. Pursuant to the city's Planning and Zoning Code, the existing facility with the proposed alterations is permitted within the C-1 Zone with a Conditional Use Permit which is incorporated into this review. 1. The design and layout of the proposed development will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. The existing telecommunication facility with its proposed alterations is unmanned. The facility requires monthly maintenance (12 visits per year) with one service vehicle. Therefore, the required parking and traffic generated by the maintenance and upkeep is considered minimal. Therefore, the project will not have a significant impact on the neighborhood and as such will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards or unreasonably interfere with the used and enjoyment of neighboring or future developments. m. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain the harmonious orderly and attractive development contemplated by the Development Review Ordinance and the City's general plan. The existing telecommunication equipment and the proposed equipment changes are designed and painted or will be painted to match the color of the office/ commercial building it is mounted on. Additionally, existing trees adjacent to the building's north elevation and younger trees adjacent to the south and east elevations will assist or eventually assist in reducing the equipments negative aesthetic impact. As a result, the visual impacts will be limited and the project will be compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and will 5 maintain the harmonious orderly and attractive..•.' development contemplated by the Development Rev'ew Ordinance and the City's General Plan.�� n. The design of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture and color that will remain aesthetically appealing and will retain a reasonably adequate level of maintenance. The existing telecommunication equipment and the proposed equipment changes are designed and painted or will be painted to match the color of the office/ commercial building it is mounted on. Additionally, existing trees adjacent to the building's north elevation and younger trees adjacent to the south and east elevations will assist or eventually assist in reducing the equipments negative aesthetic impact. As a result, the visual impacts will be limited and will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture and color that will remain aesthetically appealing. The materials and paint utilized will retain a reasonably adequate level of maintenance. o. The proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Due to the conditions of approval and the issuance of City permits and inspections, that the project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Furthermore, the consensus of the scientific com- munity maintains that the radio frequency radiation emitted and the lower frequency electromagnetic fields associated with this type of facility does not produce adverse health effects in humans because they are non -ionizing in nature and normal exposures are controlled so as not to result in thermal effects. As such, the facility with its alterations wIll not be detrimental to the use, enjoyment or valuation of property or persons located in the vicinity of the project site. 5. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth above, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Application subject to the following conditions: (a) The project shall substantially conform to site plan and elevations collectively labeled as Exhibit "A" dated May 13, 1997, as submitted and approved by the 0 Planning Commission. (b) The site shall be maintained in a condition whh s free of debris both during and after the con- /1 struction, addition, or implementation of the entitlement granted herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether during or subsequent to construction shall be done only by the property owner, applicant or by a duly permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste from residential, commercial, construction, and industrial areas within the City. It shall be the applicant's obligation to insure that the waste contractor utilized has obtained permits from the City of Diamond Bar to provide such services. (c) The applicant shall install ground cover to match the existing in the planter areas where the ground cover has not survived. (d) As required by the Building Official, before construction begins, the applicant shall install temporary construction fencing along the project construction area, pursuant to Building and Safety Division requirement. The fencing shall remain until the Building Official approves its removal. (e) In the event of any future maintenance problems, abandonment of the use or changes in technology which render the above mentioned facility and screening devices obsolete, the applicant shall, upon notification by the City, remove the screening devices and/or facility within 90 days of the notification. (£) All conditions of approval in Resolution No. 92-28 in for Conditional Use Permit No. 92-9 shall remain full force and effect unless amended as part of this action. (g) Plans shall conform to State and local Building Codes (i.e. 1994 Uniform Building Code, Plumbing Code, Mechanical Code and 1993 National Electrical Code) as well as the State Energy Code. (h) The proposed antennas and microwave dish shall be engineered to meet wind loads of 80 m.p.he with an exposure "C". Also the existing roof shall be designed for the additional antenna loads. (i) All proposed cable install aintedthe exterior ebuilding walls shall be flashed, p d to match existing. r� 9, (j) The proposed cable installed on the roof shall not interrupt the roof's drainage. (k) The applicant shall comply with Planning and Zoning, and Building and Safety Division's and Public Works Department's requirements. (1) This grant is valid for one (1) year and shall be exercised (i.e. construction) within that period or this grant shall expire. A one (1) year extension of time may be requested in writing and submitted to the City 30 days prior to this grant's expiration dated. (m) This grant shall not be effective for any purpose until the permittee and owner of the property involved (if other than the permittee) have filed, within fifteen (15) days of approval of this grant, at the City of Diamond Bar Community Development Department, their affidavit stating that they are aware of and agree to accept all the conditions of this grant. Further, this grant shall not be effective until the permittee pays remaining City processing fees. (n) If the Department of Fish and Game determines that Fish and Game Code Section 711.4 applies to the approval of this project, then the applicant shall remit to the City, within five days of this grant's approval, a cashier's check of $25.00 for a documentary handling fee in connection with Fish and Game Code requirements. Furthermore, if this project is not exempt from a filing fee imposed because the project has more than a deminimis impact on fish and wildlife, the applicant shall also pay to the Department of Fish and Game any such fee and any fine which the Department determines to be owed. The Planning Commission shall: (a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and (b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, to AirTouch Cellular, 3 Park Plaza, Irvine, CA 92714, and Carole Anderson, Torito Plaza Partnership, 2355 Golden Springs Drive, Suite A, Diamond Bar, CA 91765. 0 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JULY 1997 BY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. BY: Joe Ruzicka, Chairman I, James DeStefano, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of July, 1997, by the following vote: ATTEST: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: James DeStefano, Secretary RESOLIITION NO. 92-28 A RESOLIITION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 92-9 A REQUEST. TO LOCATE AN UNMANNED CELLULAR TELEPHONE SITE OF TELEPHONE TRANSMITTING EQUIPMENT INSTALLED WITHIN A LEASED 665 SQUARE FOOT INTERIOR AREA AND ROOF TOP ANTENNAS, 23555 GOLDEN SPRINGS DRIVE, DIAMOND BAR, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals 1. The applicant, PACTEL CELLULAR, P.O. Box 19707, Irvine, CA 92713 has heretofore filed an application as described above in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the project, located at address indicated in the title of this Resolution, shall be referred to as "the application". 2. On April 18, 1989, the City of Diamond Bar was estab- lished as a duly organized municipal corporation of the State of California. On said date, pursuant to the requirements of the California Government Code Section 57376, Title 21 and 22, the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar adopted its ordinance No. 14, thereby adopt- ing the Los Angeles County Code as the ordinances of the City of Diamond Bar. Title 21 and 22 of the Los Angeles County Code contains the Development Code of the County of Los Angeles now currently applicable to development applications, including the subject application, within the City of Diamond Bar. 3. The City of Diamond Bar lacks an operative General Plan. Accordingly, action was taken on the subject application, as to consistency with the General Plan, pursuant to the terms and provisions of Ordinance No.4 (1992) of the' City of Diamond Bar. 4. On November 23, 1992 the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application, and concluded said public hearing on that date. 5. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: 1. This Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. The Planning Commission hereby finds that the initial study and review prepared by the City of Diamond Bar and a Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder and further said Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgement of the City of Diamond Bar. 3. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds and determines that, having considered the record as a whole including the findings set forth below, and changes and alterations which have been incorporated into and conditioned upon the proposed project set forth in the application, there is no evidence before this Planning Commission that the project proposed herein will have the potential of an adverse effect on wild life resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Based upon substantial evidence, this Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effects contained in Section 753.5(d) of.Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. Notwithstanding any previous Subsection of this Resolution, if the Department of Fish and Game requires payment of a fee pursuant to Section 711.4 of the Fish and Game Code, payment thereof shall be made by the applicant prior to the issuance of any building permit or any other entitlement. 4. Based on the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above -referenced public hearing opened on November 23, 1992 and concluded on said date including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and in conformance with Ordinance No. 4 (1992), the Planning Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The subject property is located at 23555 Golden Springs Dre in the City of Diamond Bar and is currently developed with a two story commercial office building. To the north is a vacant lot, to the south is single family residential development, to the east there is a multi -family residential development, and.to the west there is a commercial office development. (b) That the requested use at the location will not: (1). Adversely affect the health, peace, comfort or welfare of persons residing in the surrounding area, or (2) Be materially detrimental to the use, enjoyment or valuation of property of other persons located in the vicinity of the site, or (3) Jeopardize, endanger or otherwise constitute a menace to public health, safety or general welfare; and (c) That the proposed site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, parking facilities, landscaping and other development features prescribed in this approval; and (d) That the proposed site is adequately served: (1) By highways or streets of sufficient width and improved as necessary to carry the kind and quantity of traffic such use would generate, and (2) By other public or.private service facilities as are required. (e) The property is located in Zone C-1 and allows this use by Conditional Use Permit. The site is approximately 1 acre in size and is developed with an existing commercial center/office building; (f) The applicant's request is for the improvement of an existing unit and the location of a microwave repeater station and antennas on an existing structure; (g) The subject site lies within the Diamond Bar General Plan General Commercial designation; The current zoning of the site is in -compliance with the land use designation; (h) Notification of the public hearing .for this project has been made; (i) The design and layout of the proposed project is consistent with the applicable elements 'of the city 's General Plan, design guidelines and architectural criteria of the appropriate dis- trict; 3 (j) The design and layout of the proposed development will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of the neighboring existing and future developments, and will not create tra££ic or pedestrians hazards; (k) The architectural design of the proposed microwave repeater station is compatible with the character of the surrounding current and proposed development and will maintain the harmonious, orderly, and attractive development contemplated by this Chapter and the General Plan of the City; 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth ' herein, this Commission, in conformance with the General Plan, hereby finds as follows: (a) The project is consistent with the adopted General Plan; (b) Substantial evidence exists, considering the records as a whole, to determine that the project, as proposed and conditioned herein, will not be detrimental to or interfere with the adopted- - General Plan. 6. Based on. the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to the following restrictions as to use and standard conditions contained within this document: Conditions of Approval (1) The repeater station is approved as shown. Three copies of the revised plot plan marked Exhibit "A" and conforming to such of the following conditions as can shown on a plan, shall be submitted for approval of the Community Development Director. The property shall thereafter be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the approved plans. (2) That the applicant must, comply with all State, zone C- 1, Engineering Department, and Building and Safety Department requirements. (3) This grant is valid for two years and must be exercised (i.e. construction started) within that period or this grant will expire. A one year extension may be requested in writing and submitted to the City 30 days prior to the expiration date. (4) This permit shall not be effective for any purpose until a duly authorized representative of the owner of the property involved has filed, at the office of Diamond Cl the Affida is aware o permit Engineering Department Condition (1) Restriping of the entire parking cluding directional arrows. 8. The Planning Commission Secretary Shall: (a) Certify to the adoption of this and (b) Forthwith transmit a certifiedf this Resolution, by certified mail, return equest, to: Elaine Diorio and PacTel at the ad t forth on the Application. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF NOVEMBE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY O/F D-IAMOND BAR ✓ l� Bruce Flamenbaum, Chairman 5 I, James DeStefano, Planning Commission secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23RD day of November, 1992, by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Flamenbaum, Grothe, MacBride, and Meyer NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Li ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ^ ATTEST: � v"� " - ' es Destefa , Secretary 3 CITY OF DLAri OND BAR CObLIIUNI' DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 21660 E. Copiey Drive Suite 190 (909)396-5676 Fax (909)861-3117 DEVELOPAIENT REVIEW APPLICATION Record Owner Name Torito Plaza P'ship (Last name first) Address City Phone( Applicant AirTouch Cellular (Last name first) - P.0. Box 19707 Irvine, CA y 92623-9707 Phone( 7 ) 222-8228 FPL M Deposits aiO&V w ReceipW Sao ay Date Rec'd 7 Applicant's Agent Sheri Sawver (Last name first) P.O, Box 19707 Irvine, CA 92623-9707 Phonc(7 ) 222-8228 NOTE: It is the applicant's responsibility to notify the Community Development Director in writing of any change of the principals involved during the processing of this case. (Attach a separate sheet, if necusary, including names, addresses, and signatures of members ofpartncrsrtips,joint vcnturu, and directors of corporations.) Consent: I clertify\ ihad.l am the owner of the herein described property and permit the applicant !o fzle this request. Signed Date 1 f Certification: I, the undersigned, hereby certify underpenalty ofperjury that the information herein provided is correct to Inc best of my knowledge. Print Name Sheri Sawyer (Applicant or Agent) Date (Applicant or Agent) Location 23555 Golden Spring Diamond Bar (Street address or tract and lot number) Zoning Commercial C-1 Previous Cases Conditional Present Use of Site Cellular telephone .facility on rooftop of commercial office building Use applied for Continued use of cellular facil isting directional cellular antennas (measuring 2'xl') with new antennas measurin¢ 4.5' x 1. Addition of 2' diameter microwave dish. Legal oescnptton SEE ATTACHED Area devoted to structures Project Size N/A Style of Architecture Number of Floors Proposed N/A Landscaping/Open space N/A Lot Coverage N/A Proposed density N/A (Units/Acres) Cut Import If yes, Quantity. Export If yes, Quantity Slope of Roof .flat If yes, Quantity. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR COMMUNITY T)EVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 21660 E. Cop Drive Suite 190 (909)396-5676 Fax (909)861-3117 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION Record Owner Name Torito Plaza P'ship (Last name fast) Addrus Phone( Applicant Ai rTrmrh fUP l lnl ar (Last name lust) P.O. Box 19707 Irvine 92623-9707 Phone( 7) 222-8228 17� q q1 3 Case # FPL N Deposit S ReceiptY By Date Rec'd Applicant's Agent Sheri Sawver (Last name first) c/o AirTouch Cellular P.O. Box 19707 Irvine 92623-9707 Yhonc(7) 222-8228 NOTE: 1[ is the applicant's responsibility to notify the Community Development D'uector in writing of any change of the principals involved during the processing of this case. (Attach separate sheet, if necessary, including names, addresses, and signatures of member of partnerships joint ventures, and directors of corporations.) Consent: I certify that I am*e-ownerof the herein described property and permit the appitcant to fide this request. Date �11 re'cor�d, Downers) 3A b�9 7 Cerd'fuatfan: I, the undersigned, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information herein provtded is corredW the best of my knowledge. Print Name Sheri Sawyer for AirTouch Cellular (Applicant or Agent) (Applicant or Agent) Location 23555 Golden Springs Drive, Diamond Bar, CA (Street address or tract and lot number) Commercial C-1 Previous Cases Conditional Use Permit 92-9 Present Use of Site Cellular telephone facility on rooftop of commercial office building Use applied fot Continued use of cellular facility. Replace existing directional cellular antennas (measuring 2'xl')with new cellular antennas measuring 4.5' x 1'. Addition of 2' diameter microwave dish. Project Size (gross acres) N/A Project density N/A - Domestic Water Source N/A Company/District N/A CON :IONAL USE PERMIT BURDEN OF PR In addition to the information required in the application, the applicant shall substantiate to the satisfaction of the planning Commission, the following facts: A, That the requested use at the location proposed will not: I. Adversely affect the health, peace, comfort or welfare of persons residing or working in the surrounding area, or 2. Be materially detrimental to the use, enjoyment or valuation of property of other persons located in the vicinity of the site, or 3. Jeopardize, endanger or otherwise constitute a menace to the public health, safety or general welfare. SEE ATTACHED SHEET B. That the proposed site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, landscaping and other development features prescribed in this Title 22, or as is otherwise required in order to integrate said use with the uses in the surrounding area. N/A C. That the proposed site is adequately served: 1. By highways or streets of sufficient width and improved as necessary to carry the kind and quantity of traffic such use would generate, and 2. By other public or private service facilities as are required. N/A Unmanned facility — visits to the site on a monthly basis for maintenance only LEGAL DESCRIPTION (all ownership comprising the proposed lots)/parcel(s) SEE ATTACHED Area devoted to structures N/A Landscaping/Open space N/A Residential Project: N/A and N/A (gross area) (No. of lots) Proposed densityN/A (Units/Acres) Standard Compact i:l!S.fRSST!fl Requued Provided N/A N/A N/A Total N/A Burden of Proof -Conditional Use Permit Case No 92-9 (Modifiedl A. The proposed project involves replacing the existing directional cellular antennas, currently measuring 2' in length by 1' in width, with new antennas measuring approximately 4.5' in length by 1' in width. In addition, one 2' diameter microwave dish will be added. These antennas will be painted to match the building. This cellular facility has been in operation since June 1993. It has had no adverse affect on the health, peace, comfort or welfare of persons residing or working in the surrounding area. The previously described modifications to the facility are minor in nature and aze not anticipated to jeopardize the public health, safety, or general welfaze of those occupants in the office building or in the surrounding azea. This unmanned facility will continue to be visited approximately twelve times per year by a maintenance crew. There would be no need for additional parking. (staff use) PROJECT NUhIBER(s): I TMAL STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE A. GENERAL INFORMATION Project Applicant (Ovmer): Torito Plaza Partnershi 23555 Golden Springs Road ADDRESS Diamond Bar CA 91765 (909) 861-2800 (Bobbie Miller) PHONE / i� 2. 3a. 3b. 4. Action requested and project description: Modification of CUP 92-9 to (measuring 2'x1') with new a 2' diameter microwave dish. Project Representative: Sheri Sawyer for AirTouch Cellular NAME p.0. Box 19707 ADo2F« Irvine, CA 92623-9707 (714) 222-8228 PHONE 1 ace existing directional cellular antennas Street location of project: _23555 Golden Springs Present use of site: Cellular telephone facility on roof of commercial office building. Previous use of site or structures: SAME Please list all previous cases (if any) related to this project: CUP 92-9 5. Other related permit/approvals required. Specify type and grant ng agency. Development Review 6. Are you planning future phases of this project? Y N If yes, explain: 7. Project Area: 9. Oovered by structures, pavipg: N/A . Landscaping, open space: N/A Total Area: N/A Number of floors: N/A Present zoning: C-1 10. Water and sewer service. Water Sewers Domestic _ Public Does service exist at site? Y N Y N If yes, do purveyors have capacity to meet demand of project and all other approved projects? Y N Y N If domestic water or public sewers are not available, how w ll these services be provided? Residential Projects: 11. Number and type of units: N/A 12. Schools: What school district(s) serves the property? Are existing school facilities adequate to meet project needs? YES NO If not, what provisions will be made for additional classrooms? Non -Residential projects: 13. Distance to nearest residential use or sensitive use (school, hospital, etc.) Approximately 250 feet 14. Number and floor area of buildings: existing structure 15. Number of employees and shifts: unmanned facility 16. Maximum employees per shift: N/A 17. Operating hours: 24 hrs 18. Identify any: End products N/A Waste products N/A Means of disposal N/A 19. Do project operations use, store or produce hazardous substances such as oil, pesticides, chemicals, paints, or radioactive materials? YES NO If yes, explain 20. Do your operations regL . any pressurized tanks? YES NO If yes, explain 21. Identify any flammable, reactive or explosive materials to be located on -site. None 220 Will delivery or shipment tacks travel through residential areas to reach the nearest highway? If yes, explain B. ENVIItONMENTAL INFORMATION 1. Environmental Setting—ProjectSite a. Ezistinguse/structures Commercial office building b. Topognphy/slopes N/A *c. Vegetation N/A *d. Animals N/A *e. Watercourses N/A f. Cultural/historicalresources N/A g. Other N/A 2. Environmental Setting —Surrounding Area a. Ezistinguses structures (types, densities): commerical, vacant land, medical center, residential b. Topography/slopes N/A *c. Vegetation N/A - *d. Animals N/A . *e. Watercourses N/A f. C�rltural/historicalresources N/A 3 g. O[her N/A Are there any major trees on the site, including oak trees? YES NO If yes, type and number: ' i 4. Will any natural watery ses, surface flow patterns, etc., be changed ' ugh project development?: YES NO If yes, explain: * Answers are not required if the area does not contain natural, undeveloped land. 5. Grading: Will the project require grading? YES NO If yes, how many cubic yards? Will it be balanced on site? YES NO If not balanced, where will dirt be obtained or deposited? 6. Are there any identifiable landslides or other major geologic hazards on the property (including uncompacted fill)? YES NO If yes, explain: 7. Is the property located within a high fire hazard area (hillsides with moderately dense vegetation)? YES NO Distance to nearest fire station: Less than two (2) miles 8. Noise: Existing noise sources at site: None Noise to be generated by project: None 9. Fumes: Odors generated by project: None Could toxic fumes be generated? No 10, What energy -conserving designs or material will be used? N/A to: Honorable Chairman and Members of the Planning Coriirmission via: James DeStefano, Community Development D' ew from: Bob Rose, Community Services Director re: Transmittal of Draft Parks Master Plan/Tentative Schedule for Approval date: June 27, 1997 Please find attached the draft copy of the City of Diamond Bar Parks Master Plan. This plan is still going through the approval process. The tentative schedule for the approval process is as follows: Tues, July 8 Presentation of Plan to the Planning Commission AQMD Auditorium; 7:00 P.M. 21865 East Copley Drive Thuis, July 10 Review of Plan by Parks and Recreation Conunission. Consideration of recommendation for approval. Heritage Park Community Center; 7:00 P.M. 2900 S. Brea Canyon Road Tues, August 5 Presentation of Plan to the City Council. AQMD Auditorium;P.M. 21865 East Copley Drive Dates listed above are subject to change. cc: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager INTEROFFICE MEMORANDIIM To: Chairman and Planning Commissioners From: James DeStefano; Community Development Subject: Draft Parks Master Plan Date: June 27, 1997 D' rvC Attached £or your information and review please find a copy of the Draft Parks Master Plan and tentative schedule for approval. The development of the Parks Master Plan implements the General Plan Resource Management Element and sets forth a planning and development tool for parks, facilities, trails and recreation programs. A presentation of the Draft Plan is scheduled before the Planning Commission on July 8, 1997. It, is recommended that the Commission comment upon the document as deemed appropriate. In late Summer 1997 the Plan will again come before the Commission £or a General Plan conformity finding (Government Code Section 65401) prior to £final action by the City Council. Should you have any questions regarding the Parks Master Plan please feel free to contact Bob Rose, Community Services Director or myself. attachments - Draft Parks Master Plan dated June 12, 1997 cc: Bob Rose jds