Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/24/1997South Coast Air Quality Management District Auditorium 21865 East Copley Drive Diamond Bar, California Chairman Vice Chairman Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Toe Ruzicka Don Schad Franklin Fong Mike Goldenberg Toe McManus Copies of staff reports or other written documentation relating to agenda items are on file in the Community Development office, located at 21660 E. Copley Drive, Suite 190, and are available for public inspection. If you have questions regarding an agenda item, please call (909) 396-5676 during regular business hours. In an effort to comply with the requirements of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the City of Diamond Bar requires that any person in need of any type of special equipment, assistance or accomodation(s) in order to communicate at a City public meeting must inform the Community Development Department at (909) 396 5676 a minimum of 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting. I� F41&GPCAG&7Dh.GHD please refrain from smoking, caring or drinking in tke Auditorium The City o f Diamond Bar uses recycled paper and encourages you to do the same. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA Tuesday, June 24, 1997 x«c x�somuon xo. �-9 CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 P•m• PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: 1. ROLL CALL: COMMISSIONERS: Chairman Joe Ruzicka, Vice Chairman Don Schad, Mike Goldenberg, Franklin Fong, and Jce McManus 2, MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMA�,NTS: This is the time and place for the general public to address the members of the � typo Commission on any item that is within their jurisdiction, allowing the p ebli tian oPPo d for the speak on non-public hearing and non -agenda items. ri ae 1° 1 i a five minute maximum _ .__ _r «t,;� f rm ie vnlnntarV). .There s 3, CONSENT CALENDAR: The following items listed on the consent calendar are considered routine and are approved by a single motion. Consent calendar items may be removed from the agenda by request of the Commission only: 3.1 Minutes of June 10, 1997 4, OLD BUSINESS: None g, NEW BUSINESS: None 6. PUBLIC HEARING: 6.1 Development Review No. 97-5 is a request (pursuant to Code Section 22.72.020.A.) to convert an end unit of an existing shopping center into a Taco Bell restaurant with adrive-thru isle and exterior and interior remodeling. Property Location: 218 Diamond Bar Blvd., Diamond Bar Property Owners: Diamond Bar Associates, 4350 La Jolla Village Dr., San Diego, CA 92112-1233 Applicant: Peter Capriotti, Cotti Foods Corp., 25 Mauchly, #321, Irvine, CA Environmental Assessment: The environmental evaluation shows that the proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to the guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act, (CEQA), Section 15301(a). 1 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review No. 97-5, Findings of Fact and conditions of aproval as listed within the attached resolution. 7. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: 8. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 8.1 Status of Development Code Process Recommendation: It is recommended that the Commission agree to a processing schedule and time frame for the review of the Development Code. 9. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: CITY COUNCIL July 1, 1997 - 6:30 p.m. meeting at AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar TRAFFIC &TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION -July 10, 1997 - 7:00 p.m„ AQMD Board Hearing Room, 21865 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar PARKS &RECREATION COMMISSION -July 24, 1997 = 7:00 p.m., AQMD Board Hearing Room, 21865 E. Copley Drive. CONCERT IN THE PARK -July 2, 1997 - Forte -Fourth of July Show" 10. ADJOURNMENT; Tuesday, July 8, 1997 2 MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR REGULAR MEETING OF HE 1PLANNING COMMISSION CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Ruzicka called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. at the South Coast Air Quality Management Auditorium, 21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissioner Goldenberg. ROLL CALL: Chairman Ruzicka, Vice Chairman Schad, and Present: Commissioners, Fong,Goldenberg and McManus. Also Present: Acting Community Development Director Catherine Johnson and Assistant Planner Ann Lungu. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS - None CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Minutes of May 27, 1997. VC/Schad made a motion, seconded bminuC/McMtesaofsMayd27a 1997oas seconded by C/Fong, to approve corredted. The motion was approved 5-0. OLD BUSINESS - None NEW BUSINESS - None PUBLIC HEARING - None PLANING COMMISSION ITEMS: C/McManus stated that with respect to Mr. Nguyenletter regarding the Darrin Drive telecommunications site he has a difficult time with an individual who addresses the Planning Commission on an issue when he does not understand the composition of the Planning Commission. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 1. Development Code Process Update. ACDD/Johnson presented the update. ACDD/Johnson responded Co VC/Schad that telecommunications systems are proposed to be addressed in Article III of the Development Code. open space will be retained in accordance with the General Plan. 2. Census Update, DRAFT Chair/Ruzicka asked if staff anticipates activity, problems or items that the Planning Commission should be looking at on this project. ACDD/Johnson responded not at this time. The project is in its beginning stages and may require input from the Commission at a later time. Process updates will be provided to the Commission from time to time. SCHEDULE OF FIITIIRE EVENTS: Chair/Ruzicka reminded the Commissioner's that the Concerts in the Park series of ten concerts begins on June 25. He pointed out the Sheriff's Open House on Saturday, June 21, 1997. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business Co come before the Planning Commission, VC/Schad moved, C/McManus seconded, to adjourn the meeting. Chair/Ruzicka adjourned the meeting at 7:12 p.m. to June 24, 1997. Respectfully Submitted, Catherine Johnson Acting Community Development Director Attest: Joe Ruzicka Chairman AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: REPORT DATE: MEETING DATE: CASE/FILE NUMBER: APPLICATION REQUEST: PROPERTY LOCATION: PROPERTY OWNERS: APPLICANT: BACKGROUND: City of Diamond Bar PLANNING COMIVIISSION Staff Report 6.1 June 2, 1997 June 24, 1597 Development Review No. 97-5 To convert an end unit of an existing shopping center into a Taco Bell restaurant with a drive- thru isle and exterior and interior remodeling. 218 Diamond Bar Blvd. Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Diamond Bar Associates 4350 La Jolla Village Dr. San Diego, CA 92122-1233 Peter Capriotti Cotti Foods Corporation 25 Mauchly, #321 Irvine, CA 92618 The property owners, Diamond Bar Associates and applicant, Peter Capriotti of Cotti Foods Corporation are requesting approval of Development Review No. 97-5 (pursuant to Code Section 22.72.020.A.). The request will convert an end unit (without adding square footage) of an existing shopping center into a Taco Bell restaurant with a drive-thru isle. Additionally, interior and exterior remodeling will occur. The project site is located at 218 Diamond Bar Boulevard within a commercial development identified as Diamond Bar Shopping Center. The center is approximately 8.7 acres. Approximately 102,350 square feet is devoted to structure. The uses within the center include Von's Supermarket, Savon Drug, Coast Federal Bank, a restaurant, and general retail. The project site has a General 01 Plan Land Use designation of General Commercial (C). It is within the Neighborhood Business -Billboard Exclusion (C-2-BE) Zone which permits fast food restaurants with drive-thru isles. Generally, the following zones and use surround the project site: to the north is the Pomona (60) Freeway and the C-2-BE Zone; to the south is the C-2-BE Zone; to the west is the Commercial Planned Development (CPD) Zone; and to the east is the Single Family Residence -Minimum Lot Size 8,000 Square Feet (R-1-8,00) Zone. The shopping center was reviewed and approved by Los Angeles County Regional Planning in 1970. At that time, the unit which. Taco Bell desires to occupy was approved for a pizza restaurant. Since the closing of the pizza restaurant, the unit has housed several retail uses. Currently, it is vacant. ANALYSIS: In 1990, the City established Development Review Ordinance No.5. Its purpose is to: support the General Plan's implementation; stress quality community design standards; encourage an orderly and harmonious appearance of structures and property; assist development to be more cognizant with public concerns of aesthetics; reasonably ensure that new development does not have an adverse aesthetic, health, safety or architecturally related impact upon adjoining properties or the City in general and preserve significant topographic features. Pursuant to the Development Review Ordinance's Section 22.72.020.A., an application for Development Review is required for any and all commercial, industrial and institutional development which involves the issuance of a building permit for construction or reconstruction of a structure. Therefore, the proposed project, a commercial development involving the issuance of a building permit requires Development Review by the Planning Commission. The interior remodeling of the existing 3,000 square foot unit, as shown in Exhibit "A", includes the installation of a kitchen with service area, cooler/freezer, pantry, office, employee lounge, two restrooms, dining room, entry with customer waiting area. The exterior remodeling, as shown in Exhibit "A", includes the installation of a tower - 31 feet high, aluminum door/window system, metal canopy above the front entry and wood trellis on the front facade and as the drive-thru canopy. All exterior remodeling materials and colors will match the existing. The exterior alterations do not change the architectural style of the shopping center. The alterations are compatible with the existing structures and will add interest and variety to the center's architecture. Pursuant to the Code, structures utilized for dining shall provide the number of parking spaces based on occupancy, as calculated by the Building official. Furthermore, the Los Angeles County Planning and Zoning Code requires that one parking space be E provided for every three occupants. The Building official's maximum occupancy of 111. Therefore, 37 calculations indicate a max parking spaces are required. The shopping center's parking area provides 476 spaces. With the current uses and vacancies, 455 parking spaces are required. considering the uses and their peak times of operation and the deletion and additions of parr ng ded spacis due to the Taco Bell drive-thru isle, the parking p adequate. The parking lot area adjacent to the proposed Taco Bell and areas affect by this project's proposal will be resurfaced and restriped The drive-thru isle will be located on the north side of the proposed restaurant unit (see Exhibit "A"). The isle's entrance will occur at the first driveway on Palomino Drive coming from Diamond Bar Boulevard. The drive-thru isle will be delineated by stamped and colored concrete, some landscaping and directional and menu boards i sgns. The isle will contain an order speaker The order speaker will be located approximately 80 feewest of the t residential uses which are adjacent to the shopping center's rear property line. The speaker will face west, emitting sound in that direction. The speaker's sound emittence from 16 feet, at medium volume, is 61 dBA. This sound level is equivalent to a dishwasher at 10 feet, an air conditioning unit at 15 feet, or an electric typewriter at 10 feet. With the speaker sound emitting in a westerly direction and the. residences, a minimum of 80 feet east of the speaker, the speaker sound will not have a significant impact on the residences. The shopping center was approved with landscaped areas. However, some landscaped areas need revitalization (i.e. replacement of dead or missing shrubs and ground cover). Additionally, the planter area across the parking lot from the proposed restaurant's main entry and at the rear of the service station consists of several pinebut lacks shrubs that theand ground * It will be emissing/dead shrubs and ground coverover be replacedrequired An existing wall, approximately six feet tall, divides the single family residences from the shopping center. This wall needs repair and paint. It will be required that the wall be repaired and painted. It appears that equipment enclosures exist on the east side of the restaurant unit. These enclosures shall be stuccoed and painted to match the shopping center structures. Any conduit, wires, pipes, etc. which exist or may be installed shall be cover with flashing painted to match the structure. Ladders utilized for roof shall be painted to match the structure. Additionally, f trash/ recycling bin enclosure, located at the restaurant unit's east side, shall be construct from materials which match the structure. Existing exterior building lighting will be utilized. Sconces will be added at the restaurant's main entry and front trellis. Down lighting will be added to the drive-thru isle's trellis. Additional parking lot lighting standards will not be installed. R3 The proposed days and hours of operation are Sunday through Thursday from 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. and Friday and Saturday from 6:00 a.m. to Midnight. There will be approximately eighteen to twenty-two employees, with six employees per shift and four shifts per day. Supply deliveries will take place twice during the week. The City requires that these deliveries occur during the restaurant's non - peak hours. Signage is not a part of this request. At a later date, the applicant is required to submit a sign request to the City for review and approval. The City�s Public Works Department and Building and Safety Division reviewed this project. Their recommendations are within the attached draft resolution. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The environmental evaluation shows that the proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to the guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section 15301 (a). NOTICE OF PIIBLIC HEARING: Notice for this project was published in the Inland Valley Bulletin and the San Gabriel Valley Tribune on June 24, 1997. Public hearing notices were mailed to approximately 271 property owners within a 500 foot radius of the project site on June 6, 1997. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review No. 97-5, Findings of Fact and conditions of approval as listed within the attached resolution. REQIIIRED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FINDINGS: 1. The design and layout of the proposed project is consistent with the applicable elements of the Cityfs general plan, design guidelines of the appropriate district, and any adopted architectural criteria for specialized area, such as designated historic districts, theme area, specific plans, community plans, boulevards, or planned developments; 2. Approval of the design and layout of the proposed project will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future development, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards; 3. The architectural design of the proposed project is compatible with the characteristics of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22.72 of Development Review Ordinance No. 5 (1990) and the City's General Plan; 4. The design of the proposed project would provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, and color that will remain aesthetically appealing and will retain a reasonably adequate level of maintenance; and 5. The proposed project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Prepared by: Abung ss' tant Planner Attachments: 1. Draft resolution; 2. Exhibit "A^ -site plan, floor plan and elevations dated June 24, 1997; and 3. Application. 5 B. Resolution. �� NOW, THEREFORE,. it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: i. This Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. The Planning Commission hereby determines that the project identified above in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, as amended, and the guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15301 (a) Article 19 of Division 13 of the California Code of Regulations. 3. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds and determines that, having considered the record as a whole including the findings set forth below, and changes and alterations which have been incorporated into and conditioned upon the proposed project set forth in the application, there is no evidence before this Planning Commission that the project proposed herein will have the potential of an adverse effect on wild life resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Based upon substantial evidence, this Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effects contained in Section 753.5 (d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 4. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein, this Planning Commission hereby finds as follows: (a) The project relates to an 8.7 acre site developed with a retail shopping center with approximately 102,350 square feet devoted to structure. The center is identified as Diamond Bar Shopping Center located at 218 Diamond Bar Boulevard. (b) The project site has a General Plan Land Use designation of General .Commercial (C). It is zoned Neighborhood Business -Billboard Exclusion (C-2-BE). (c) Generally, the following zones and use surround the project site: to the north is the Pomona (60) Freeway and the C-2-BE Zone; to the south is the C- 2-BE Zone; to the west is the Commercial Planned Development (CPD) Zone; and to the east is the Single Family Residence -Minimum Lot Size 8,000 Square Feet (R-1-8,00) Zone. (d) The proposed Development Review is a request to convert an end unit (without adding square footage) of an existing shopping center into a Taco Bell restaurant with a drive-thru isle. Additionally, interior and exterior remodeling will occur. (e) The design and layout of the proposed devel is consistent with the applicable elements of th City's general plan, design guidelines of the appropriate district, and any adopted architectura criteria for specialized area, such as designated historic districts, theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards, or planned developments. The proposed project does not alter the shopping center's existing architectural styles or expand the restaurant unit's square footage. The design and layout of the proposed restaurant is consistent with the General Plan in that it will enhance the existing shopping center by the revitalizing the center due to the remodeling, landscaping and the use it self. Furthermore, pursuant to the General Plan, the proposed restaurant is a permitted use within the General Commercial land use designation and a revenue generating use that will aid in minimizing sale tax leakage out of Diamond Bar. (f) The design and layout of the proposed development will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future development and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. The proposed restaurant is within the Neighborhood - Business -Billboard Exclusion (C-2-BE) Zone which permits restaurants by right. This is an established retail shopping center in which the proposed Taco Bell unit was approved for a pizza restaurant in 1970 by Los Angeles Regional Planning. The drive-thru isle will be located on the north side of the proposed restaurant unit (see Exhibit "A"). The isle's entrance will occur at the first driveway on Palomino Drive coming from Diamond Bar Boulevard. The drive-thru isle will be delineated by stamped and colored concrete, some landscaping and directional signs. It is these measures utilized for the isle's identification that will eliminate traffic and pedestrian hazards. The isle will contain an order speaker and menu board. The order speaker will be located approximately 80 feet west of the residential uses which are adjacent to the shopping center's rear property line. The speaker will face west, emitting sound in that direction. The speaker's sound emittence from 16 feet, at medium volume, is 61 dBA. This sound level is equivalent to a dishwasher at 10 feet, an air conditioning unit at 15 feet, or an electric typewriter at l0 feet. With the speaker sound emitting in a westerly direction and the residences, a minimum of 80 feet east of the speaker, the speaker sound will not have a significant impact on the residences. 3 Pursuant to the Code, structures utilized for shall provide the number of parking spaces base �� occupancy, as calculated by the Building Official. Furthermore, the Los Angeles County Planning and 1 Zoning Code requires that one parking space be provided for every three occupants. The Building Official's calculations indicate a maximum occupancy of 111. Therefore, 37 parking spaces are required. The shopping center's parking area provides 476 spaces. With the current uses and vacancies, 455 parking spaces are required. Considering the uses and their peak times of operation and the deletion and addition of parking spaces due to the Taco Bell drive-thru isle, the parking provided is adequate. The parking lot area adjacent to the proposed Taco Bell and areas affect by this project's proposal will be resurfaced and restriped. Due to the above referenced measures, the design and layout of the proposed restaurant will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future development and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. (g) The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22.72 of Development Review Ordinance No. 5 (1990) and the City's general plan. The shopping center was originally processed and approved through Los Angeles County Regional Planning 1970. The proposed restaurant does not alter the shopping center's architectural design. The architectural design of commercial and residential development in the surrounding area is eclectic. The center's architectural style is Mediterranean. The proposed exterior remodeling and the tower addition will add interest and variety to the center's existing architecture through height variation, texture and color. These exterior alterations are compatible with the existing structures within the center and adjacent commercial development. Therefore, the proposed project is compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by the City's Development Review Ordinance and General Plan. (h) The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, and color that will remain aesthetically appealing and will retain a reasonably adequate level of maintena' The originally approved design of the shopping 4% center will not be altered by the proposed restaurant. However, the above referenced exterior alterations (see (e) and (g) above) will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture and color that will remain aesthetically appealing and will retain a reasonably adequate level of maintenance. (i) The proposed development will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Before, the issuance of any .City permits, the proposed project is required to comply with all conditions within the approved resolution and the Building and Safety Division, Public Works Depart- ment, Health Department, Fire Department and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements. The referenced agenciesf involvement will ensure that the proposed restaurant is not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth above, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Application subject to the following conditions: (a) The project shall substantially conform to site plan, floor plan and elevations collectively labeled as Exhibit "A" dated June 24, 1997, as submitted and approved by the Planning Commission. (b) The site shall be maintained in a condition which is free of debris both during and after the con- struction, addition, or implementation of the entitlement granted herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether during or subsequent to construction shall be done only by the property owner, applicant or by a duly permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste from residential, commercial, construction, and industrial areas within the City. It shall be the applicant's obligation to insure that the waste contractor utilized has obtained permits from the City of Diamond Bar to provide such services. (c) The days and hours of operation shall be Sunday through Thursday from 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. and Friday and Saturday from 6:00 a.m. to Midnig (d) Supply deliveries shall occur during the �1 ,•N restaurant's non -peak hours of operation. t (e) A trash/recycle bin enclosure shall be located on the east side of the restaurant unit. The enclosure shall be constructed from materials and colors that match the structure. A detail of the enclosure shall be reviewed and approval by the City before its construction. (f) Any conduit, wires, pipes, etc. which exists or may be installed shall be covered with flashing painted to match the structure. Ladders utilized for roof access shall be painted to match the structure. (g) The planter area across the parking lot from the proposed restaurant's main entry and at the rear of the service station shall be planted with shrubs and ground cover that matches the existing landscaping. Any landscaping destroyed during the remodeling process and any landscaping that has perished over time shall be replaced to match existing. Landscape/irrigation plan delineating the species size, color and location shall be submitted to the City for review and approval before the issuance of any City permits. (h) Lighting added for this project shall be arranged as to prevent glare or direct illumination in any residential zone or in a manner which will not cause a traffic hazard. (i) The existing block wall which divides the single family residences from the shopping center shall be repaired and painted in a color compatible with the shopping center structure. (j) The drive-thru isle shall be delineated by stamped and colored concrete. This design concept shall be review and approved by the City before its installation. (k) The restaurant shall comply with American Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements as approved by the Building Official. Plans shall delineate the following: (1) Handicap van parking; (2) Shortest accessible route to accessible entrance(s); (3) Restrooms' handicap accessibility; and (4) Handicap ramps. 0 eZ (1) All sign requests shall be submitted to the City ford%' review and approval. (m) The project shall obtain the Los Angeles County Health Department's approval. (n) The project shall obtain the Los Angeles County Fire Department's approval. (o) The project shall meet all A-3 occupancy requirements. (p) The restaurant structure shall meet the 1994 U.B.0 U.P.C., U.M.C. and the 1993 National Electric Code requirements. (q) The project shall comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements. (r) Structures shall be engineered to meet wind loads of 80 m.p.h. with a "C" exposure. (s) This grant is valid for two years and shall be exercised (i.ee construction started) within that period or this grant shall expire. A one year extension may be requested in writing and submitted to the City 30 days prior to the expiration date. (t) This grant shall not be effective for any purpose until the permittee and owner of the property involved (if other than the permittee) have filed, within fifteen (15) days of approval of this grant, at the City of Diamond Bar Community Development Department, their affidavit stating that they are aware of and agree to accept all the conditions of this grant. Further, this grant shall not be .effective until the permittee pays remaining City processing fees. (u) If the Department of Fish and Game determines that Fish and Game Code Section 711.4 applies to the approval of this project, then the applicant shall remit to the City, within five days of this grant's approval, a cashier's check of $25.00 for a documentary handling fee in connection with Fish and Game Code requirements. Furthermore, if this project is not exempt from a filing fee imposed because the project has more than a deminimis impact on fish and wildlife, the applicant shall also pay to the Department of Fish and Game any such fee and any fine which the Department determines to be owed. The Planning Commission shall: a (a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and (b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, to: Diamond Bar Associates, 4350 La Jolla Village Drive, San Diego, CA 92122-1233, and Peter Capriotti, Cotti Foods Corporation, 25 Mauchly, #321, Irvine, CA 92618 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF JUKE1997BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. , , BY: Joe Ruzicka, Chairman I, James Destefano, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of June, 1997, by the following vote: ATTEST: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: James Destefano, Secretary E o�iz8is7 11:1s ^n il� ' APR-28-1997 10�27 s i �o� !r' ' _ - - ZtSGQ �,., (9CB)34fi „� ,-4 J `�pp,,, n3 M^ ` �:�:; �::. ��'J' �, ����: �j::, �;. s.x: �f��. ,1 q �;;,. 5=,. z'': . .� �;{. � . :;.•t::' �L isscnami��� . ��Ie: � � °f siga(sj 8' z 9' Fre�,randing, d l - 3' x 24' WaU 9ga) 695 0518 BL'NDI� P - ROPERTIES ` Tr izecHahn Ops MhILZrTi'Y DEyELOPi DEPA81'1�� �• �P�' Dave Sane 194 ��7��az(909)8613117 . . ; APPiSC��Oid dun t D1Ram�a tsa� Associates, s;:Naxce a California iiatrited R _. U-nsc name &m) . Addzr�s*Partnership —.+350 La 1a17a Village Drzve, ffG00 �9 � - 92122-123) — APPIim! Corti Fggds Pe€� Caprio t r CLut aacic sntj . 25 Mauc Irvine, CA Ste: 321 � — @I 0 619 546 _ 2i0: bate Rec'd L cp 'FesS__ 2, o '�"P��` 7l7-oaZ - _ AP,PL�'s Agezit Cook, Fred 3984B Airway Avenue Costa Mesa, CA 92618 pb��9 546-1001 92626 Phor.�1)4 727-3752 714 - - ��x PEaac( ) 9 6 6-1 41 5 ��� �a� 3s5z No2'1: ti is �� �,,s�'S1�a�v� °F��eF�n�:aisisralved�afE�n� � �� YDevalflF�:iDirr,;m.nwritingaf�nY�mgc �.fiu3.f+til3Ct^l'3i�3IIxC. xf9G�y.J.. II]Clad�y, � . dircrrsntsofkorpOrslioas-) g'�`s•II-"`��.andaiagaatu,-rsefm�.caof�.v,�ships•j�vc�iu,,•�.aa3 Caasen.G I r�'}y � Z mrz � . .. D g PnFTl� tfiea�warr�of�e her�7z detrti3� p,.np�' andPeJmit the ePP�eant re Jz7r rids 5i�� i ��,.,, ., 'esidanal:/ � . n'9 �... �j� Wend � �� �� �'LG� 'a California united Godo•,•Sr. Vi e Fresident, p' 'Inc., a California corpora r .sn finance %ierzby certify .. pezinj� afljelJw?` that , as managing general p2rta2r e. Aze injonn�aahen�Br+�yided is li�� �/� �_ -------.__Date � _. - _c - _ =� �., � - - � __ __ aa7�Ic tu:^.d signs . fi $ higb, a � - ;'y i� �< Legal description (all ownetsbip comprising the proposed lot(s)/parcel(s)) See attached exhi t Area devoted to structures 3 r 10 S : F Landscaping/Open space Project Size Lot Coverage Proposed density Style of Architecture Spanish Mission (Units/Acres) Number of Floors Proposed One SlopeofRoof. nsore' R Grading N/A — Flat W/Maof If Yes, Quantity Cut N/A Fill Import N/A If yes, Quantity N/A Export N/A If Yes, Quanhty- Nr/r CITY OF DIAMOND BAR INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: CHAIRMAN AND PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: CATHERINE JOHNSON, SENIOR PLANNER %� SUBJECT: STATUS OF DEVELOPMENT.CODE PROCESS DATE: JUNE 18, 1997 Within the next few weeks, the first Articles of the Commission's review. The establish a tentative schedule Code and to discuss the recommendations. Processing Schedule To recap what was agreed target date for adoption of 1997, which will result in the Planning Division will be presenting Development Code for the Planning purpose of this memorandum is to for the review of the draft Development proposed methodology for review and upon by staff and the Commission, the the Development Code is November 18, a January 1, 1998 effective date. In the Code will be divided into four pieces three articles) with each of the pieces meeting dates. These meetings are workshops/hearings. The meeting on the first piece of the draft Code is scheduled for July 221 1997. The next three regularly scheduled Punning Commission hearings are August 12, August 26 and September 9. However, in order to allow sufficient time to meet the target date for a recommendation to the City Council, and to allow adequate time to thoroughly review each article, it is suggested that the Commission consider extended meetings and additional meeting dates. It is suggested that weekly meetings, beginning at 6:30 p.m. be considered on the following additional dates: July 29, August 5, August 19, September 2. Planning Commission Memorandum June 18, 1997 Page 2 Processing Methodology It is proposed that the Commission review each piece as it is presented and informally "approve" with revisions (no formal action will be taken until the last hearing), specific articles or chapters of the Code, and proceed with the next portion, until review of each Article of the Code is complete. At the end of the series of workshops/hearings, the entire Code, including the recommended revisions will be bought back and a formal recommendation to the City Council will be made on the hearing draft and the Negative Declaration. Organization of Code/Review Schedule The draft Development Code is organized in the following manner: ARTICLE I -Purpose and Applicability of the Development Code ARTICLE II -Zoning District and Allowable Land Uses ARTICLE III -Site Planning and General Development Standards ARTICLE IV -Land Use and Development Permit Procedures ARTICLE V Subdivisions ARTICLE VI -Development Code Administration ARTICLE VII-Definitions The first Articles that will be transmitted to you for your review, will be I, VI and VII. These are the foundational Articles of the Code, describing its purpose, authority, what it does, how it applies to development projects and administrative responsibility. The Definitions Article will be an important reference for defining terms that appear in the Code. Articles I, VI and VII will be transmitted to you the first week in JUIy. Recommendation It is recommended that the Commission agree to a processing schedule and time frame for the review of the Development Code.