HomeMy WebLinkAboutRE_ Canyon Loop Trail Improvement Project Additional WorkHi Ryan,
Thank you for your work on this. As a City, we are comfortable with your proposed response and can proceed. Please note my answers below in red.
In addition, the project team walked the trail this morning and made some decisions based on nesting season and the best interests of the surrounding habitat. Due to the instability
of recent and upcoming weather/trail conditions, the project team has eliminated a portion of the stairs that are in the original plans (Steps 4-6 and 17-26). This location will still
be graded and compacted in order to provide an improved trail experience when compared to pre-constructions conditions. The team has reprioritized several project tasks and focused
primarily on water erosions devices, gabion walls, and overall trail conditions based on the limited time remaining between now and February 15.
Thank You,
Ryan Wright
From: Winkleman, Ryan <Ryan.Winkleman@mbakerintl.com>
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2023 7:29 AM
To: Ryan Wright <RWright@DiamondBarCA.Gov>; Greg Gubman <GGubman@DiamondBarCA.Gov>
Cc: Ashimine, Alan <aashimine@mbakerintl.com>
Subject: RE: Canyon Loop Trail Improvement Project Additional Work
CAUTION: This message originated outside of our City of Diamond Bar network.
**Please exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.**
Ryan,
Here is my draft language for when I respond to USFWS, per our call on Friday. Let me know if you have any changes, thanks! A couple things I wanted to ask about/point out to you:
1. Does the project completion schedule (ideally by February 14th) account for the post-construction cleanup and regrading of the excess trail widths on the sides or is this just the
date that you expect the main trail improvements to be completed? The ending date should be factoring in everything until Danny leaves. I assume the native grass mix will be hand broadcast,
so that shouldn’t be an issue with timing if so but anything requiring equipment, grading, etc. needs to be completed. Yes, the City anticipates all work, including clean up, trail
widths, and grass mix to be complete by February 14
2. If the City decides to postpone work until next fall after February 14th, will the incomplete areas be cleaned up or left undone? The reason I’m asking is because the City probably
doesn’t want to leave trail portions left undone and visually incomplete for a year, especially with some of the local opposition, but also if you clean them up and reseed them you’re
going to undo some of your local restoration work when you come back to those areas. . If for some reason we cannot complete portions of the project, the City will clean them up and
restore to a situation that is safe for public use and as aesthetically pleasing as possible.
3.
Just some things to think about. Thanks!
Hi Carol,
I relayed these changes to the avoidance measures to the City and we discussed them internally. The City is fine with incorporating these changes into the project’s avoidance measures
and very much appreciates USFWS’s responsiveness and willingness to find solutions to keep the project moving as we head into the later stages of the work. Even with the current schedule
of rain days, the City is hopeful that the project can be 100% complete with the new change order by end of day on February 14th but will evaluate progress within the week prior to
that date to determine how much longer the work will continue. They will work with the contractor to make every effort to complete everything by February 14th, but if the amount of
work remaining does not justify the additional cost on the bio side they may end prematurely and try to come back at a later date to finish the remainder of the improvements. Regardless,
I will follow-up with you at the end of the project, presumably next month, to let you know the final project completion status so that USFWS can respond accordingly to any public inquiries.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns, otherwise the revised final measures are below for the record [insert measures with changes accepted].
Ryan Winkleman | Project Manager/Senior Biologist/Certified Senior Ecologist
5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 500 | Santa Ana, CA 92707 | [O] 949-330-4115 | [M] (949) 533-0918
ryan.winkleman@mbakerintl.com <mailto:ryan.winkleman@mbakerintl.com> | www.mbakerintl.com <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwww.mbakerintl.com%2f&c=E,1,4zhFQZCnrdJONeDWgfIqcElhWNp
-Ge5jY5f7vLtqUXvyKyQUJqUp0Qar2a9gaPZRmUduJ898a5dSxeBqoGBEhRZTdA7pYQvsrhuR2PmvHCRclLW56axYyiBJK78C&typo=1> <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fmbakerintl.com%2fmedia%2f5024%2fs21_
f_061907_icons.jpg&c=E,1,xBQldCi9vtk1GAkIlCyAKqeIfD1eFA_Y_h_BuwJx0G3TP77SkipvE_ib0VPfXQBrRuEJXrx2f0RQNbMvw9pwbUZqvZ82HzTwgtnD4R_f_A,,&typo=1>
From: Winkleman, Ryan
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2023 11:07 AM
To: Ryan Wright <RWright@DiamondBarCA.Gov <mailto:RWright@DiamondBarCA.Gov> >; Greg Gubman <GGubman@DiamondBarCA.Gov <mailto:GGubman@DiamondBarCA.Gov> >
Cc: Ashimine, Alan <aashimine@mbakerintl.com <mailto:aashimine@mbakerintl.com> >
Subject: RE: Canyon Loop Trail Improvement Project Additional Work
Ryan,
I heard back from UFSWS privately with some modifications to the avoidance measures (see attached). They’re a little concerned that the last time protocol surveys were conducted was
in 2020, so they wanted to take that into account with their revised language. I’ve copied two versions below, the first with additions and deletions shown so you can see what they
changed and then again clean with all changes accepted so you can see their final proposed text. Keep in mind that these measures are specifically geared toward gnatcatchers and don’t
relieve the project of complying with other relevant requirements from the MMRP (e.g., a non-gnatcatcher nest would still trigger restrictions).
With edits
* To minimize impacts to gnatcatchers as the nesting season begins, work within 500 feet of known territories based on the 2020 survey results will be prioritized outside the gnatcatcher
breeding season over work outside of 500 feet.
* If construction is to occur past February 14, beginning February 15, the biological monitor will perform a minimum of three focused surveys, on separate days, to determine the presence
of gnatcatcher nest building activities, egg incubation activities, or brood rearing activities within 500 feet of any project construction proposed during the breeding season. If construction
is to occur past February 14, a A full-time biological monitor will be required for all work occurring within 500 feet of a known California Gnatcatcher territory, based on territories
mapped during 2020 protocol surveys until territory locations have been updated based on current survey results and/or incidental detections. and/or any updated territory locations/extents
incidentally observed during current updated surveys and/or biological monitoring. To minimize impacts to gnatcatchers as the nesting season begins, work within 500 feet of known territories
will be prioritized over work outside of 500 feet. Work outside of 500 feet from a known territory will not require a full-time monitor and will proceed with the current weekly check-in
schedule for biomonitoring. Additional surveys will be done once a week during project construction in the breeding season. These additional surveys may be suspended as approved by
the CFWO.
* Because the project does not possess an incidental take permit, if the biological monitor detects gnatcatcher breeding activity/nesting within 500 feet of construction, all work within
a 500-foot buffer of the gnatcatcher’s territory will be required to cease for the duration of the nesting season, or until authorization is otherwise granted by the USFWS to proceed
again at an earlier date. The USFWS will be notified of any gnatcatcher breeding activity within 24 hours of detection. Work outside of a 500-foot buffer from established gnatcatcher
territories/nesting may continue to proceed unless weekly surveys and/or biological monitoring detect gnatcatcher nesting activity within 500 feet. but consistent with MMRP Measure
BIO-3 if more than 7 days have elapsed since the last time work occurred in that area, a nesting bird survey with negative results will be required prior to work re-initiating.
Clean
* To minimize impacts to gnatcatchers as the nesting season begins, work within 500 feet of known territories based on the 2020 survey results will be prioritized outside the gnatcatcher
breeding season over work outside of 500 feet.
* If construction is to occur past February 14, beginning February 15, the biological monitor will perform a minimum of three focused surveys, on separate days, to determine the presence
of gnatcatcher nest building activities, egg incubation activities, or brood rearing activities within 500 feet of any project construction proposed during the breeding season. A full-time
biological monitor will be required for all work occurring within 500 feet of territories mapped during 2020 protocol surveys until territory locations have been updated based on current
survey results and/or incidental detections. Additional surveys will be done once a week during project construction in the breeding season. These additional surveys may be suspended
as approved by the CFWO.
* Because the project does not possess an incidental take permit, if the biological monitor detects gnatcatcher breeding activity/nesting within 500 feet of construction, all work within
a 500-foot buffer of the gnatcatcher’s territory will be required to cease for the duration of the nesting season, or until authorization is otherwise granted by the USFWS to proceed
again at an earlier date. The USFWS will be notified of any gnatcatcher breeding activity within 24 hours of detection. Work outside of a 500-foot buffer from established gnatcatcher
territories/nesting may continue to proceed unless weekly surveys and/or biological monitoring detect gnatcatcher nesting activity within 500 feet.
Regarding the biologist who will conduct the gnatcatcher surveys, Carol clarified with the following language, “The gnatcatcher biologist will be a trained ornithologist with at least
40 hours of independent gnatcatcher observation in the field and documented experience of at least 20 hours of locating and monitoring gnatcatcher nests. If necessary, more than one
biologist may be used.” She also stated that due to workload they don’t have a lot of time to vet biologists for this requirement but if needed the City could send resumes to them.
This would be a different process than the CDFW approval, which as we saw was focused more on monitoring experience and less so on having extensive gnatcatcher experience. For this
reason I’m thinking that probably two biologists would be required any time the gnatcatcher nesting survey is occurring. This is because one biologist meeting CDFW’s less stringent
requirements would need to be present with the crew at all times, while the other meeting the more stringent requirements above would be surveying up to 500 feet away for gnatcatcher
breeding activity and may be away from the crew for several hours.
The MMRP requires a nesting bird survey at the beginning of construction during the nesting season or whenever construction is stalled for longer than 7 days. The revised second measure
above would require three nesting bird surveys focused specifically on gnatcatchers on three separate days beginning February 15, and then once per week after that until construction
is completed, regardless of when the project starts or any gaps in construction. These surveys would need to occur within 500 feet of the entire project until such time that contemporary
territory locations can be mapped. On the plus side because they’re focused on gnatcatchers they would only need to be in gnatcatcher habitat, which largely restricts them to the areas
south of the trail, with only a few isolated areas north of the trail. Although this is more restrictive than what we had proposed, I think this is still a win for the project if it
allows work to just get done now rather than waiting another year with an incomplete project.
Should this measure be triggered by the project going past February 14, the City currently does not have anybody under contract to conduct nesting bird surveys. We expected construction
to be completed prior to the nesting season so conducting nesting bird surveys is not a part of Endemic’s scope of work, they’re only scoped to monitor the construction and provide
daily reports. With that in mind, I’d be happy to conduct the surveys myself, although I’m guessing we won’t have a really accurate idea of how the scheduling will proceed until we
get to late January/early February. Rather than processing another change order for additional budget, it may be preferable to just reallocate some of the funds that are currently set
aside for Endemic for us to use instead, particularly since we did that big overestimate of full-time monitoring days in early November that didn’t pan out.
Please let me know if you’d like to schedule a call between the four of us to discuss, thanks!
Ryan Winkleman | Project Manager/Senior Biologist/Certified Senior Ecologist
5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 500 | Santa Ana, CA 92707 | [O] 949-330-4115 | [M] (949) 533-0918
ryan.winkleman@mbakerintl.com <mailto:ryan.winkleman@mbakerintl.com> | www.mbakerintl.com <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwww.mbakerintl.com%2f&c=E,1,TRFwjeYj_gyfFCFEYxmsgJSBNI2
oTmoBOxOkO_LPk9PktU3YGTYmiCW2Db8Ob0nSVjpAcEcpj5S1WX-KrA0B2NT3UqbKJJQfLHTfMnV2UA,,&typo=1> <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fmbakerintl.com%2fmedia%2f5024%2fs21_f_061907_icons.j
pg&c=E,1,0n9EVhjzMsqxPreO2aHx1nhP_p7uD6UKZvu3Ya6VwOOeRx9q89atI9PqaBxArqwl9ipqpSj-m2sjnCW7FkflZ2WSk18FDSS31Nw4x3xzILMStTvLkhd3BfOrE9c,&typo=1>
From: Winkleman, Ryan
Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2023 2:52 PM
To: Roberts, Carol <carol_a_roberts@fws.gov <mailto:carol_a_roberts@fws.gov> >
Cc: Kershek, Lauren <lauren_kershek@fws.gov <mailto:lauren_kershek@fws.gov> >; Ryan Wright <RWright@DiamondBarCA.Gov <mailto:RWright@DiamondBarCA.Gov> >; Greg Gubman <GGubman@DiamondBarCA.Gov
<mailto:GGubman@DiamondBarCA.Gov> >; Ashimine, Alan <aashimine@mbakerintl.com <mailto:aashimine@mbakerintl.com> >
Subject: Canyon Loop Trail Improvement Project Additional Work
Hello Carol,
Happy New Year and I hope you had a good holiday season!
As we previously discussed last month, the City of Diamond Bar has been considering conducting additional improvements to the Canyon Loop Trail in response to trail performance with
rainfall this season. These additional improvements are primarily focused on containing erosion and controlling run-off to the extent possible in areas that have been observed thus
far to be more susceptible to rainfall damage even with existing work, and would still occur within the existing approved footprint of the project. I have been notified by the City
that they have approved the additional cost for the construction contractor to implement these additional improvements, which would occur after the current construction finishes.
Based on the conversation that you and I had, the City has agreed to implement the following avoidance and minimization measures for this additional work:
* If construction is to occur past February 14, a full-time biological monitor will be required for all work occurring within 500 feet of a known California Gnatcatcher territory, based
on the territories mapped during my 2020 protocol surveys and/or any updated territory locations/extents incidentally observed during current biological monitoring. To minimize impacts
to gnatcatchers as the nesting season begins, work within 500 feet of known territories will be prioritized over work outside of 500 feet. Work outside of 500 feet from a known territory
will not require a full-time monitor and will proceed with the current weekly check-in schedule for biomonitoring.
* Because the project does not possess an incidental take permit, if the biological monitor detects gnatcatcher breeding activity/nesting within 500 feet of construction, all work within
a 500-foot buffer of the gnatcatcher’s territory will be required to cease for the duration of the nesting season, or until authorization is otherwise granted by the USFWS to proceed
again at an earlier date. The USFWS will be notified of any gnatcatcher breeding activity within 24 hours of detection. Work outside of a 500-foot buffer from established gnatcatcher
territories/nesting may continue to proceed but consistent with MMRP Measure BIO-3 if more than 7 days have elapsed since the last time work occurred in that area, a nesting bird survey
with negative results will be required prior to work re-initiating.
Please let me know if you have any modifications to these measures or any concerns with moving forward in this direction.
Thank you!
Ryan Winkleman | Project Manager/Senior Biologist/Certified Senior Ecologist
5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 500 | Santa Ana, CA 92707 | [O] 949-330-4115 | [M] (949) 533-0918
ryan.winkleman@mbakerintl.com <mailto:ryan.winkleman@mbakerintl.com> | www.mbakerintl.com <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwww.mbakerintl.com%2f&c=E,1,_EyFEjcyfYRY7uigAf2VWrjaNJR
0U16iCo8FNyJ_M3V_mR9qw2gWg1409v_PpddG3xIZf_t-UujOXc1tp3-WjXE1fggGIKqXOZtMbZ_luVJvfVIsM_ky-geT&typo=1> <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fmbakerintl.com%2fmedia%2f5024%2fs21_f_06
1907_icons.jpg&c=E,1,l8k1JE0cS3QIOHvHMbOVUxTmJN_TDkD6eRT2u1KUEM0P3HYCsLrgswEl2QmTcG2Frf_LhEAu-hQreoRLt1EybVBxIF-NVEijAOlLZXz45eY,&typo=1>
絨施퐥ࣕ듪덼ц隣僬冚ꤾ篧쩋鋧鈽륍礄垡崔ǩ阘ͣ꽙뇐⿶댮髶먌ꀲᛃ辰䙀』⿌岊֓�䑧뚨欣磧摚ꫭ뾩뛤≋瘲⫨蔛떶់䇕픬撪㕋薶ꛥ㬎띍կႴꌌ飗頕掣Ά髛᪖᭓윷竄愱것秥ᙎᬜ硾臤ṷ㍟㹟灔㚰�㋮煫）缃㴽ᗮ쮲㭄胴ꇅ䳴麡ￜ囋㮮晵㰟얱ᣉ媌쫜ڰ桙⣭璒䝣�靚鰛ᅖﯳ뵓棹⒪겓聼聯ﱕ﹩幉ﰬ히볰쩔됛꺼너噰㭴벣䉋壙䡤㜰⏍밼悷댂캭∜풢淪掵ⅿ嫦つꀲ篥长䇪ᓊ췮䄫钮ᓢ⺿꣘鸪⍊펠跱큦㎀䟯㏻䅞⑰இ
ﾭᩙ펊ꢢ痵䂗ᖠ韯堡犼᱿႗Ҕ闁쨙╉✊僳ᰪ欖㢚⌫ꃪ눇톙代쿦㡰ⶏ徍碢䧬�唳ϻ闦�㟥岐ҵ⽞㥕鋯♅轑ϡề碠氖ᚽ➫뻛뿋럄�놖퍄ӄ颢䱖녇⼴�쥾෫둟炡鞓忕�梺ཻ敝ｨ厞䖫�女姲诛⽕ᩉ躍ｪ섊쵝䘋�덁ꭶఌ傆ң䙾ﵳꡔ꾿쮗撎鍙줷慛ꇐ廬悫짱ヵ䄮ꥩξ譊ļ磏爐釡䇁ڬ،㍐೨껙뎚惋ꫬ惕ꙮ캀퍈茞⃑Ṳ瀱ꭖᣑ队磅퐾觅깱푋Ɓ켹ۧ条钛滇蚴鹄眎Ԡ똓꠶櫲בּ䠲捁组剰票는䃍䬗丗懪䛚㧞ꆋ茸㔲젴ぴꢸᮣѥ⢿ࣸ퐧⁖೨雪⦛ퟕ
Ļᨆ➻ᯅ㗡Ꜧ祅ፕꠘ愫墤압◯燫ꀇ䆍竴쐵Ȼ횻迕缪㠵㔑ꈒ럨ⷨ᜶㘍㼫稖걒﨨㸀祤ぁ窆쨋芣撂�萍쇐⡭メ橖໒滚諷왁혛�蘠マ＼�ㄨμ槊疾䕁歆ﷁᗎᢱ衕飼ᮊݺ媃刜鿨趲燑屉拢ﹿ㢑Ⓝ揖郮ꃓ궋咛륹进萏敺㵎セￔ뾱쓛ށ렀䘕⼎ࡇᨙ贀곓㒕Ẉ斜얓ሙশ⯻ᰌ㻁揗ၠ욛교ᚒ⌆녧ⶤ➉瘣삫廓觀立걲䏇磦ᶼⅫ怨䔬웟寬姹◛屵Ꙥ澕�염香者ꀔ뇓顝蕁烿⹋쁫숿ࣩ縀䖯�錄ॻ隌ﱻ贺랯闉벩刘텭噦夹萴ꞷ뱊䫓濡븉僼
텏벁ᑏ镃焕ﵼ垥弉鯫ꛅ艠절㡔僙৵鎁䂏䗹⾱眷갘⟙瀰瘻쌊户䘠调펶쀢㷓䀊 ံ处@轠륇홐ǦⳭ篇ﯨ닛禷䨨ᯇ݂⟬㭦딘ꪃ�㰣偦볖ꈪ찼셯鑅ϴ藌횙畅ʨ뱮뉸祃晦ᛘ잢ૠმ㒮䫩쁀梿㜎끐愜嚄ᣅ⯮༩策摼ᬨ箏炡悪䫾틦蓛㐓;濃⑮ሕ鴮ꦀ⩯◾腙魑릁ꇸ岦賉ᣑ욨址㑰垈ᆸ��샧��痱㷦ꗨ믃脀⡓펆梘茓⏪뿁樭녅苠콫繢櫉䩌锚ꨈ㞏뾚K馝ⱱ딎㲨겞쎴蝷壟ᗈ뮟ﯹ囇翞蛮釼篃쥗楨샰쓄ↁ⚉츴톞᷾⥃Əﲽ螪箿ꝫ㍖
㖹纷덽䏾뮛㞻�漌믟畻ㄾ댺罷↛㜓⑃邈귇ռ쇓㤶㊯䥖௴徬䡊鍖좩벰ꪋ└奡�涚뤓贎낻沐卩�딉慖䶮឵앸봽콳앵귞䩇鶍荙퐰櫓䜲ޅ恫㺝䤐錺ਫ棾壯ᩘቱჯꅖ玱瑤Ὧ㕯Ἢ㵊ٱ濫䲱�⠡鉉毒�륓�ꌼ⇓䛽䮕ၤ㟪뽢蹩풏检갉腈줃䤓睼雴㸨Ԝ⢥ਘ䪀가쇧ᾈ嶔峫�혎篑揨儴䆢볕병糟䳜䳖ꍠ㰖쎈칔钉쥟㜃샻紃逾ǵ쾭该裸ӓבֿ⍮ὰ⏡忂뻋얐�ⳑ춑숶壨矧Լ䪾䎁�槔ꂊሪﰌ鿯䮍숾옮誂萝㚖람㹷豨�낋⌨袌賑뒦阴쌇ີ⌆ᕰ죄珠流
뙇㷜熝왩㠟썷寯纱⯔祼ꥵｋǐ⟜쁔턱֡⧀홤㻬玴㺜�ᎃṫ淀ྯʱᣇ固ᡧ２쟑²垒綠ꛙꇳ砚ન킒襅ꓩ鴳艎袂ꕏ뇁�ڞ楽캐嵦瑁噲ꅧ씤ₒ֩㳀⿔祹폌�뉬飲ᶹ淌喿ℹ岍쳳戒욱呈䨴诀ȓ浚쀇䕗盫丑䎶瀻쪹日摗鼉៲ܖロ짱䎜ញℚᔣᑪ돁见匵걒ꗄ旊˙㮀첑寺뙄㺓뾋ℼ쫻戦쩂뽵ᑆꦝⳁ锞劇䂌͚羜睋롦눨刖ꇹ줯딻鈐譣髅听ꤼ䫱Ꝁ㪎쁌蠭燸틎휦ࡊ떇⭪謆노齘䦌꣑괉꺛ൻ㻂냛ᡃ솞ᖀꀋ࣡睚ട騑툨
ゃ쪴샄ᣪ씈ᘀ얳声⪬ꪟ馂꺮乕ധ辌ຏࠠዋ褗㤄懄碐堗ሌ�ꏩ당ೖ迴킐꧌窜ↇ∐薑粋㋨企尬叺㫉磤暼ꟁ㍄˄헠粲돼ᔢࡉቛ糡ᚘ뛺䍍愉�ꑔ䮯�됽ᒑ欄횾遝ㅐꠘᕎ㯳댦탂쇞㵘ꄛ곝舱霿峜왈ℙ解欶Ⴕ峗궵딻뫳춊㍮楚頟৩࡙ꑇḻ֮㎕尿醙薄낶퐌ಇდǫ孬㮳翀࿕痣꓿༟旸慷돠㠸羌윒硳踟踠団梽女࣐ᾇ�뛹�퍭⇯춹淥劣씒⊿僓哅븡ᅠ粴㮦秼끣⬦䋩꼷峿⾡ፆ馢锷텾᪒轩稨ි缉闓쑬Ϳ廏ᷣ�暎磩氊梧郰�ɯ勷ꮠ鯋
듇뻙뀼菥泹좞�좠㧚琖嗱㰯惄䐰偡ꩍ鬑쓨酼盆ꔒ뜶岈燍퓚崖樥쪧푷ƚ���罏⅄偆宏�ޛണ䈲婏싋飬铄�釕뎕ᯠ䦀䫦僿㉕ꥳ圠咮惩獒ਦ鿶㍔ﯢ쎚ต㥨࣡뺷螢ꉆ칅ᓴﲅ칾퍋詺咽夺蟸鰦넏ⵎ梠퇞⣉䘗ᮆṐ﨎锟ꁚふ嵘礉명╆ꨕ⊈ᅪ쎌鲁ꑎᴣ杔彅擊䘬뿥ᙒ餽塛ࢎ▿该⒌뒢H꼎뵮펌墾㖀塺ힻ宖扎킸釅斈⽹勿팋걋ﶎ禨淯遦шฝ㑞㓑䩦闓⮗磸吅ꀫ벻貲쯫Ǡ�Ōԭ犨멺狸缑ࢢᑎ諁航藽藣ઇ睄
ᰁ耋ꅀ㉘艪؏稁ᚎ੮芚䵝㌌嶈竵ᔗᤨ杉沱䷬栧갘颒ⶽ얮쿫륪礦돢䵝햵닏컅涞떐ꗱཊ趍遶�孊킜ꢅ⚃鱈ላ鉽믶⛌꿓ើ⛳턤父䶬뙯�篻ꘂ㒾됗㲀輩돲鈟緲∶㵅�즄睥簊믫ߠ鬻䇃₍铠ㆋ숆䭡￫隀៎嬊繜胚舋了㑌딯ᯰ轚褑臮ຐ쉩ꌇᡤ扪供拄站捶憖惋㑶៏ꎳ빁ꘘĊ좾餏茭錖づ�뱒䢿䍌寙ᅀ춮䗲켧㴗鸞҇旉덇僆ઘ鐿뜅酧滪삡ਞꥤ┰暎ꎝ妣뫨Ḝ㕜ㄱ㨺泘ݦ덠ᯘ撎糣京躍廳堊㳜ൻ톘搒Ꙇ䚊でۂ쵒쭉곬ꄺ壛鞧띯洮媶㒭ᑤ뗪唑悇救쫮쪒
ঐ᳨긝망Ȫࡽ碳륡⅒浔�ꐝ馈⸬ԏ볆ꎽ屷賌더劬藖Ṃ叉�ꙡ꽙論뙫〼﹝곒�頽㑀彩ퟥ㸝펷땨䤛ࠠ싎ꆆ铧䜷⌦ᰆ兝佁ࣾﾾ匃ᰰ妶ᓭ溉㛏Ꝅ빖鈍僂谥说厮헩暞쎟艡퇚♓❽쨇鏧剉꼦늙捻蘾૱儾♊착る鷠歗ꔂ嗨헕炯갮몌�㕱沋岣㙞Ꙙ阣辏�煆ખ㶇៍㻼➫ݤ沽鄬︍氪⺮钘맟섃X펃軮閹耷崫ﲂ⊑┐⾔䫾쯨ꋳ佨ᔌÞᕟ鰲롑를∽禦輀㾘ↅﺊ帿삚䶜쀃肤榞頂缸䆀齇ꄬ꽸燦容즡ᣆ딐掾ꏅ⁐䓷ԢỶ猘ퟕ注ㅸ톩赠
䮹猳ṭꛖᵡ藾ଘ劉斊ឥ뮤뫫ᅭ庮ꚯﺼ굌後뚿ࣺ�爂鐸�쁴⯠殮ᾤ諶쳾㣆甭�밸櫩ዘ䇘獻뉼䬙귴党ᜳ�ွ༬骅踿ܿ㿾�혁맔簆ᢲ፡邖懀邯ሜ▐聠儀쉦慴Ɉ䉄錒戠ᕫ躴햪睚䕫떭뫖땭몎嫖횵嫖ꫫ핵굑誣❽섉燚뿴ﻷ븿粒�곣윤㓠쟀韗冀�奼ᐾ♻䃦q漼 ᾖ㴏ᾳ鐾ᄿ瘜∿쏠ⲋ黂ꙇ鄫ﲔ靰ᄾ巾茛ﶢᴜ䅼챢㉻᎙䛬硢ﻠ추Ҽ䜧ꀶ䧮䭝 잨荢篻㏚�嵜쓻㣅墨ߓ⯨獧豠ﰝ�ﺜ⎞⤜踩윒䝪鎚씣댑ᄂỜ坤䰁㨹킾搁狓셟硲༌졄䀧
ǐ㞴晥輔컭柤ㅵ婟ᙘⰐ읣ᱍ⾔騚뛆뒕펖ಘ㧷�裲ꄾ⺑禾䓙婔�⸫ꜩ䦲蝌㪵⾃⮐ᬝ㿔鶊�ࣆ䭮李✤툳놙溱铩㙴Ɔ墄┄᭢થ剣㙲溉܀�杼䏍㧸⠸숕䗼舾빭쥉ᆲ툧踢⥱쑺﮷힁淐탰㟒찗豶鐤௴䯏괎鯯쀚Ⲉᔴ柅멅禇燹롣Ǿ顄汏祎鴌伍悊ۇ窸І窹♸쌋ꎽ썒誋튼࣒戇湐뎌龗꾓ޏ쏋㰻ᶞᖟǥ쇢�µ쿈峄벱ᠮ頰錽ꍎ릴�㦡峝鴝㸰錥蕂떟辄囍쁭텃꜓鏤䋽䧝懨潍ಐ⤒ꇶ悴溝흜쩚壘쪅힘㔕⇦厔먋䍶ꐋଁ᧰녓䱰뿔
㠏烱≰㓮᎐呩ᾖ䋦腱Ꜫ锂�삃ɏ䝺Ў쟽퐾횪麈ꕚ뉇粨�핑꤉嫃䔳縞ᅑ㺑榁蟃㱛ꊺㆃ졵✰剂骓邢웄碄磻祸엸௴辳␐菱ᒩུᠲ鯰㐈蠖넉ﺔᢾ틦ئ䈱糚น礝㱒ɡˁ্鸄繈漎ꐄί셎茡凥ᤓⅴ糅빛鋻㔇ꬴ⪩进ᘣ䭲쏓犣鉫铒퇹铬쌊諌馮蘴䡛둊汗꾨偳汒馣᷊郘Ⓑ焱幘弌ᠯꪡ軎髨Ửΰ奚鄑휑䁧ᄎ麀ȭⓒ脻ꅊ更風鎋錣䣩똃蓟玁滋ꍻ彇隅彇ꖡꄩ투鎫䦨睝ﶆ鏺偳鑘瑏按鏪퐾㑩ㇷ訚า姐阤ඌ䫄蟻冻ꍲኼ솁ᡓ릹薡ᒉ⌆ኃ芚ਅ庘
챑ⱬነई儳胒蘁켾亀滹羘컞较膝贾浫譃︼锧謉릕ை៍뿘俶۠ও斅ℙ슡ὤ潸∮㊫愾噐宄왘䇫㻑Ǝ㆑絮짅鞄⁓鈞鄘逐䜘蚧撅珆볘䃔⾼쐷⎙鯬ሚ➓ݤ눊秀鄑ᤝ씑돳襋켋寂ﰝጣ펲⺅酁悂齛荢钪�웛燀䱡⻰Ἆ唺➸놆氩ከ剏띖⼢㞅⢄ⓕ�㎾峅궠횏ᗷ㕦͕쪷ﵖꍩҌᕎ沚哣緔�Ꝯ즪↋厀對넲튌ᛪΎ啒導忊専吊�⯔笴臗虄渹悢瀬霦࢘ᮟծ甞촜ꀖﭙ颍ጃ쉌伹䊌耝૦㝿җ練릢쬢葜禓⯬獀囅礑抒�Ꟊݾ䭦㬬ⱝ茻峁�橙
ᐵ⛌鶡쭒ඓ᰿厴㚜⥓⁘⬲㙦ᦉ䫾蘱㿙豢⫅﷾䭊⩝ጓ诓莃싲̪ԫ愱闩밀㦪氁ᜯႻ꼷䓒鮁关艠ो⼳ᮛ渜蠚臣ⱔ᠓짿쏾뛨韓ᘝ㧴砀ﾟᇉꄏᏻ嬩뜐័浂縜Ҳ걾컐鐾鰕鯨ȃ鏤멄揻ଷ�땼細澭늚︒㶓䕄쾘ꇲऱ�緩≴螺꜃㜌闞跡닇眴Ჷ埛擂�嵹ᦩ�칎䳴湡睯ۇ蓅➇ᤄ컩겮ꇆ貔⟸훆탐ꇲꮙ皻є댻싃Ⲙ苩舸�ễᘖ狆怊ꁗ뢏㐌蟃璔頛㥂脆ꏊꢪꤋ틟툦౩ᶪ滓ﶕ蜤ແ颗❙펡�신�뛯緘잔콴걩廕뱗ﮧէ
ఌ슸熡྾获蘷ਜᐹ㑶棬㾄熀⸀居璊璉躉ꦍ嶉ᜑ팑亅�䛺픥沤絈鴿羰梦梧홧녥糭臃譏얌ￗꁗ逜傐ן糙ᰫ藮庅Ŀ塥翂▗ᖔ䋵⽂䋴⽂䋴⽂싴臟櫲�嗿姰⽂䍴穅宊༕蔫ﶕ猪�弫粩쪍⮷꿟峜ꎹ署Ꮚ�幕벬땞窭ꃽ荅蝳ఔ㶹홴ꂰ潡䳗簳磻��詓앚ꔙ암ᵑ箪뵎ﺡ썚畺裇ﾘᘘㆮ놿醨㩫뼵䴵멫얭꺴뙚䘶ꊛ폍桖媕皓皂⺂ឩꅺ稗ឡꅺ︗ǟ쌌ꥒ挟ᯰ栗ꏺ閧䦻儃蚏垾闓ힺꛜ啡委㛦曝̍ꏳ擾�Ⅱ笞鑬赵䘃࣐�
鬑湯뢻᧒墟Ꮎ㫂湨こ꼷춯⩭欝퍮기ꞷ䶹妷샃붜찳㭭쏌聻涹ꖏ흙怸걾촯䝭�끻佢绵怋킦폡캧曔뚀笻樽ꇛ�涨욏ꌏζ罪�肎䃑衚䶹郪鍬ꓛ줎�൦䎩䶲郪鍬ꓛ줎ꤶ뉃엪躾䳚녯Ḥ魧坱軘䝵丕놮樸䂳㏛螖廚醽撌쟛뱦�耐酨㤸欶沂懚絨樑ꃇჶ軔뀑惭뿃ඃ札熛譧ꬬᰰ怓ᘄ▏嚁혙ꦀ節꘡듃쿠떄穢鈴稍퀆꾆ひ䚮砫䙠榄ᒘ햌ﶃ찦窈ʮ䞫垁娥˩ἠ櫴ꣁ權⌁ࣅᚻ뗐⧐�ś曮ހ砇uᪧ聓ʶ칠ꕠ它➹ℰ䕨筘ᡉܠⵠNJ蠝腃騵໗봀〆朊ƛ䚏
䲫ཐ⑪羅䎩삺ⲱ꿐㌅呰㒎发ቆ캏⤬ꢎ茴ՙធ뀖胗驆⫁툥ผⷆ郶鸀皠棔㛩ꅗ⨕ব蓐嚚垢쳜斑踭跆Ѡ俪땯띠瀜Ӟ傸鶃ꁆ㊅櫐筂쁭䠭㪣☰קּ륈裤䨓τꊔ중說돓匫鋿歀䐚윛¢㔎厒핧㑮腖樴䪴ҝ䅨仆峆즂ꘀﾲᇋ䓂뵿뼥菷⭮⃥桏欁䂵퀟疎퐀饦샢ಟ틡専뀪̪גૄ厭횁첛ﲐ쑊퐯㱴ʖ⩬蹸䏇鮙ἁ⑺⤡ᵫ櫂뙂䚫엺꾑⊷鉽鯲㚬겵ᇆᱵ埡켡⅖铎鵨泞䑚轇⫷壌ᰬᇋ㵮岲堓䉥灳ⵗ쏢쭢㉢⃯쒽믰㪑ಫ歜�縯ᶯ섫ꠞ깝䟙Ⱡ璒嚹켺ꁊ﹆苐ꓴ
兀㳳떝▘ꍕ퉸좠䒱돹ힺ༡䕨䮹爍궕㺟㬟쏉ꮿ�뀨更ঽ乙恉ﺡ빻泒|䉊拊礬胑Ꜣ洛ﰏᘕ쨭鐿礽꼏ꌢ杞╾⊥ホ姍爈쨻洚Ḥኸ뫦㉑正雍웩襮딐쭙鐆愗卖䏌㡇ખ攁⃐뫩䀳꽏⋦죋孑�덧⍧ਡ略木옪ꀇ�툘䑨䬹겅ܪ偣蕠蹥왯虌㚌潇뙷娰昵꥟罁灧堔輷挀鶤帬䊣勵깣�畧羕쭜걊掑㦴⁒䷭腺䳊ẫ당泖�깠搱臮䆙�䟍␣ᴅ䫀ᓖ햭睘缭鼶Ͻ낶䡪撎窇魓뵳᳒ફ부�㟇ᩨ쾳奄ﱸ�끢�㛑刺⪢枑⽾鿣䏠埙噙㼿
熻즟᙮㿝宻躃픑죏ﮫꭈ樻⮺양岆衵鵊꾵預䢷ᤋ똁૮牋譝典⮙덕雕릶뒄�煬訣贒ޕ屋뾥喯䩏孩穩瓺⚷遚鬞䷾娻ƪሼ體ꌵ襀⅞滍貽⬀㘔쎵⟴飹ﳌ⑊ꖁꗢ죶狢冀㊇궏揉䬿迖銥㛈旜륄뒂굕ퟧ樂堟惔�㹨㒢⃕涼ｅ㵷勀ㄱ狆꽁紒㠿鄜ㆀ搜⥑ꦘ봀〜Κ≆ુ禙ሾ꩙픒粡꺰픜ሸᒇᚼ纁쨵륱踘냺့⾬렂廠嘱梅ƈᤶ⥚롅섋Ũ힛᷁惙Ფ懴༻䅥庒�鹅䠩㗌ॖ牻䄥ⴔᖜ麂㟏諏渀숉龜关좻柊馮ᅓᇒೄ晱踃倊踏莖ዷ亰邋Ⓦ䖷虈ぜ쩏䘢䀜
㳊겳㫤龨됌¯띀≔莤쑼띍닾篁Ϗ斳䊨茔㦝剈툙�㎬洨䭵婅ᬪ͉વ遵�켯㮪稩礥�뮩㑊뷟钊摏쵾驆䘫툽�垨沆朅暹䩛Ბ勏䒭⢞ꭆ䡄饢䏕酲鋷寜鎼冤썬䤉�雖謗ቿ␣쬖를틙ힿ퐋ࢺө◲劳⏾볌롕袀쉏᫋硔亡㎫硕캶힠딦쭎䗃ച售㟗貘咸呥䘙钩�◅啟偫竅뚕逩䶚䚸꽗鴊햾რℽ⏄寠ᜒ쪗卑㰆깟贔瑠꺀譁㟧贫劐荙裚汫퓱೩陸嚺嚣㗈馸堢Σ煄꺣ꃙ腐㪷譓ꃜ鯂䪵ƕ䄷硥媁튡唚롩ꕑ嗂땍ꔪꕒ㗄⣤咮ᔙ딆ਞ梈唨뤦捚闤鮩䙔ࢼ酐髪嫤䭈鮎
爌ꪥ湉쑨畵걿쬧㢳ꪤ曺�䞀ꨕؕ搝먷敂䈰䧒舼쭀櫁뢴噄晘軅體遣ꢷ煸ᵝᷠ쎏♥嚹檣䰅퐘歀뱜굂İۤ䪥쉫口ʄ┫�푫鴺쓖ꯃ쵵鍸ᖼٯ〺流懃ꓜᗃ锆ꓜ땊ད쀬╚㞮솨ʬ脬屆㊯ꤴ♍꺀ᖶ�侢頓昀報甚ʐ븗笣�ᯑ쩴蕦讉㽃笂点薏媀랋꠴ക鰶µ檢䊭곓亄Ꝟ듕凢棪껒쬶蘁璖ꠃ荍棊2ƽ琣耓귛트ڐ풢誀핉괄偬ꨃ嵊嚋鎣笫佪렊ဟ݇腈曗ẓ놸Ւ蓅ᩫᩔ佽芍틐骶䎗䂄ി嫪ˢ굝Ꝏΐ喘엍쁆享畫譵ꈑ䰚紦鼪튯嫲跔뵪ꥊ虴㹺쫁猚䑐뜢䈰
ꋳ飯䕹封ᱱ禪ຄӈꍕꔚ胒䓈镐∽엝ҥ윚ꊈ저名ʠ爍ᦠᜥ㎯ꢀ�梣ᮐ自僌䃇쁗悢긻֫䪅ꎑ捌돱⾿搅湈樔ꔏ텎Ӝ∬ጧ媂㐃ԓᚐ馗쵓棱釄Ւꨐ㭉眼�㚢쀵᭡�爍饯꣖龁뒒⸡餃Ŭᐅ偄⹂ꓞ꩓䐩㈄ꀶր殨憛ꃡ䯙蒀⁼冸눅쀷洀홭珒╙ḃ⒐욃榬䓄荋摏憄泐ː呦脈ݒ㉒既䪄뉡堸ᾷ꩗銥⸮햯劍哙逌惽恾㶻㳅汥ΐ檩㵕圢⍮ƨ㞒䒂剩ጃ̥쿽ⷣ豟請쭳䔪ㅒ鄮◡䤊㢎輇줔㽀讒䩗쮋烋䊰⨪ꬪ识煳兑㸵剐쎔업╕녒虌䬗䥱䥡䒁옌䔤
י㧥ꊒ㰼⨫蔆ɉᄢⴠ옫䄡⨳墉鄆訕�ꃹ쨫ᒒ쩈릪깸겤䕈襸婈줦⼮䤐鋱楲녉ౌ됀鉅岢ꀩ⸢᜔唀蘰⮋݀ઋည儩詞쯸⸮隩쯲ﳰ苢ㄜ찘̒䓎ՙ鉢န묪⑀㧢䊢鹑تꑘ饨뮙糊ᨱ癿꒙ࢸ醊屝♔崅逮婒�⥚覑뢹⩈䆑譊稁亨ꎰ℘fi쒊ᘤ檨螼쁅�霯뮉쥹謑
泜颻踇瑹ﳨ鸉棋科ⵊ䫖ű⍧䀣૿錺첲깛⮦ꯉ들둅됍뒝⏯㛚ﯚ垽築銯䪽쿾╝⥞�劼婎祪헯�垽鿋垽篌ㅞ梷禪嗯�旿쵗칭䚨縉탧잪ꟹ잪☙윺ޤϩ秩瓴髰嘂䇋菦빤ꁪꞬꔬ⡡詿竀稃൮モ⼿憎荏颣ꏟ폠䫛뚍�ㇶ∗㐲륩癸䆫엃ೳ䚪帮㜠䕩礆㠭ｅ᳝溼깆蠩볣�䢽鱲䑹朻鶶챣ﲤ⡝퓶皎ӎ㐰䪎쒡ᄻ皎墌ᩗ鿕ᆁ㭲걦蔝楎ꉏ㈝钢�낌֗枎ﵣᐐ䒣䎫葊㦅ȃ民貃엮竟뎕칭흻�糛羊螡퐥ᴾ续䑥紻턯筎莯ꕆꥐℬ煠蟻愭ܣ샠盟엂
ⷊƅ櫸汁쫒盩樬ⲹ䖞쁸Ύ妋㜩꠶鴦�炝莅ꥻ�펤ःᰶ뉡뮼琯�蠙☏贼ퟥ༽絛짇㴦鉞∭紂ዻ䐩籒扒䉲⃒䷐洒；츑জ鰦扷䓑�釱㡄曔꫰蹴豌斋ꥅ蹄㤸過鶓✘ᛌ쒥ᎇ꒡૧⌤႔՛ᡓ괘膆♱鶵셂ﺶ⥲컩�俽䣯ꆾ鱟쏦ឧ갎篭궥�灹坨뎰挼쇜廩⾇翎⛤㨹헧Ǡ彫酚暶쏄ꢚࢺ䦿ỉ鞧仄䟘�䕴硹俀♗祼ｆ䃡쇻皕⮧᎘ﰖ꿄钓瞔鹂㼰㋜鏲힔涮㶞헬꾱찵缜壠ꎜ咸舏㞾餍襲ꡕ䳧꽎鵋埍挅導徨뗕ᄋ䉏뻯碧⟡䭙
灮置척红Ꮊ늺ꕱ㎂玧㵧泒푍湸ᥬ瀖뾃멡鳑쬕컋怭亯Ꜽꢱဴ쭆⧛䂎ణ쩔ꕱ탻暽㝾賧㶼缋⋞䀘ㄣ鄃焋葾磏킯ބ䣟ᯌ翽ꛛዻ뤷攑䅰봐ᢐ䡈쐺늓럍ᐃആ즯❢䊞쓗㟗�㝼죆骷娑ᤑ㠑༥ℬ䀜ꉜឧ̐粈齋亠柪퀦틒㳲⨂鿃㙠Ⱁ濈ᴸꂺ┙碙䆤턯鶗孽શ驒歰峆䟟繧괵焨⪹蝟牼龴ﲌ뺨㝳쵫�♆㥅糙돱Ⅻ�繷㐽菬㯭霛ᣲ䧴닺厅ᣭ姧⸹�熪ᗟ㝗텳뛉뼟윯祲禍왧㢤㺝�ﻫ�笉ᚃ굝ﯟ鹦隡婒哗쇐榋
ﾜ펻찙ψ흋腱탈ﶘெ㸙뺃妭혗砐欷ꔊ몡Ⅴ�ꛜ�읁褷屎爴죓Ɩ�喉묑᱇拹ﰙ쩌ច툲纮퉽�쎐㎍잰䓉ᶻ搅⮱夶ｬꦕ옏閴祜늊绘굛脹㿒⮒袢㈈菨⪕Ꙝ䞮拷憀귡磤첔袒Ÿ 䲁�쉝迴柰Ꞟ쇽忼ꍦ꼩൬柛猿ᇇῃꘛὰ川缾볊ⷜ࿋䳕礊꾁纍ꂪ쩶指癩ꃯ찝皽�鳨⼻鼳梆�侩ဿ矩⨩Ứ蹽煈싽㟩識뼒홏껒ᆯሻ㶒켟ᘤἺ緙峣隟ꜯ齭꧳쯃跸矀漓�菻ᬉ쫸뭞牶흴䞌虫䥏履큑�믹䰎ボ痉잱绋ﱋ뎑౿穼摽ꇣ䲣렿뢟疍៦
뜬뱏㟅缻琜❻뤗봅컺觅箾Ṏ쉜粡⓺╿뙫繰빰쇠냞�迆ݥ栧ޣ�홌ﾎﭥ陵㗓㙋༚餢쉮멡ᚱ˦訇刵㙩짐觚륏듺掐�潗쟙䁚랢ࣳ뱱附稖煡㒉脾쀐茮⬕ሐ뱄嘠䲑퐤ꨦ燤⤉ॱ愂屲낲₯饎ᢜ❟ࠗጒᓪ刽빠祖蒩뱱㷽ꓟ邤騏㷞䳘ﮝ⧇맰䨙㞧Ⲣ�타歿䯠鄜䜔ꌤ⠔䦷㠄녘腉뿢怤苉䉿䓂䌸姆쨔㩓삕ঞ婧锻�ӹ꺝寜᧒뱚璬ퟴḷ祿뭗㽯ꠌ↸哫�狀ே켇蹈췚댐塾㫔䝥�冯䏋꒷躇㔖維᭰㐛軃轳戮ყ嚫糸ⶺ�榄晋╖⯭꽢㤋ﻨ꧹襕
횷璆Ꝼ�䣙엶츺폞婊ỡ蓭섎춵ᔥ砶⣤ᢶ⾝Ნ㌖뱏げ挡䙞꒥琥흪彏巠⁺偶ᆔ�筽⢼毽ﬔ긞樭ꃻ㿌헯⬅皚⍫礿ᤐ秔弃듥꜑獅迎걘낞䷗흸忋�疷彾껇꽴ଽ嚼黭ﭦ햞懥给㲿퉺蟑ᛇ웹᧥ᩋꛂꐴ節籴쑑蝥ˠ鏅強縔ㅐǫ┟謹瞔䍦�跙趟拾駆㐓ඓ巯鋛︳匧⬞欿烊蓢欍ⱶែ⫳Ở畓㏈쟍㯇⡧蛩撗쥮喙韣纪듽뉾矶㽎쮤뜻㞛웧徆Ꮧ흍䡇뷞漲蝎巽嘶텼쓧篶晎᧟舿ﱒ䁡熛⇁ꦙ繕ꝧ峼徿銲巿듸懴
꽇욼鮌俻ⷅ厥쵟硿ೳ௵㋚ѐ䇬렑ᙉꘁġ绥돶끇⠵㊝朝䱇ﵽ圎䏣��棨噵蛠撱ೞ컫力ຝ伤뫠㫪䊵剮ꋡ卦캃㚠습令ᄤ萉帰⢐判牀쐗꺣肐⇜忴䬥ᬵ黎鿎⍢쾯鶹堜ᩘ뉚죦뼙ア龷岿旹᫁脓屻ﾳ沪랮乤홀뗬蘋ᄐ拟㾍낽答﮷뜅Ầ㨎త벛컸竝௱ꞗ깰빚佴賠ᰯຏ睛絴紖쏙㑷ᵿ巵沮ꓽ鞣犢酹俯⸪㪗ꑟ罱ㄛᙫ鶡䯼넵퇸❋濧⧺ﹸཋ놎煾⋘鉫᙮嫏辒젍貈箮ﹷ浶阃鰽트켣뇋쥽ᯄꏥ⢻㢋ล振䓮跮��土撶全쭼㟡ꛎ硍煮윁썥ﯣ汯Ფ
ᤉ⇴��鋉域贃⒬곜蜙큁鯀㹍◑�㜜ᴺ�숤컝峑밓瀩⌄ᛚ릐涹턖挶鞼ﯫ쏭埻칄ᒿ竎猜⦎宛ꗭ랊￥箸뮶꺷姱ꀺ앣ʚ핣筝伖鑅䖐䉁㪀釔⇝钚讏펭䀆ꘑ呲쨐੬㹂䮑�萔翤飥쨘䶑ﵢ잛䃃忳㟙隄闌母乚椟ⴭ沤駠ๆ牮굦௱뜳仲�뭔銵月ⲕ㌼ﾦ쫹ᚪ쾱⡱�㻟컺ꎴ폗㼨ﾟ♸톓⌹ﳿ餭駷헢⾳鹞繻玜軇㋿쫭ㅫⅡ�絾煼䋴쮞ﭽ縝譅浟ᩤ滦驝曲�劁ꯗ䎵紲䰖㏃�Ḟᾎ⨰㴾秔齕♥Ꙟ헼彛嚽洴臜�쭡嵷㇛⧖藫㈓쓏喣ك籓庙잮灚�畇魕
ᾗ㲾烩앩譏珵ᒧ疵篗捾ꍪ⍻섺얮ꛀ乛犟羷붑틩㽣믶쒦䖭䘇窆豆鴧爾湐ힶ䶎횛혗竉븺砵导䓞保鹙ﳃ�ऊ騾╽쫶믶蟹➹ॎំ쑄蟤ೕ媺⸗頾�ᛙ뉩呹껰�䓷綖憸梅ꗔ떛奋⽺雯⯉촂껆ꖳ펝㽃�颹�䥓轍坛猽엫䯠갟㳘貺䉱⯄罹龜ꌕ潗飪췿짬븐巠洇㪻乮ᠼ恚柱纋ﲖ齰튢畍�凼畻ﳥ俑ཝḌꩲ怰ꧩﱇ㊷贾놟㾖�쟭媌⥋鵰豵棼돾Ƨ卭釾ⱔࠠ′ﾣ䁎齶쐑늃ⲑሠ졓톢甗ৣ龏뒱罓㭟남偶覆⏖㮃랛铦뷶蓂睭갾
帊ᖒ판數쥐孻鋭涒ܹ䦞ﱪ펔훭ꙷ䕼諱㫏픾喥魯㦥쏃鋞禼憥뇘澳㛈뤲훻덽瘪ᣭ症콟㺫�熟溥俔椂➄蝪⾒ᥬ橺輿볖䎗뽍㝳�줏쪵퇄瓯�転翷쇽巭᪾뫒ቂ�嘎쟋퉳ⅶ遶偻䕡닔蘱㰟띓虈몝⍱뗻�낼藱ʼn擟顬ꦧᏅ彗閜뜖塖恵䙋⛸署趆曫뼧汴磱뷮誢苗쌓ꗷ镨擣�孴⟓뮡棛暓꿜疹메恵즜瘻鬇毂ꋼ㰾ᤜᲕ₾䁥�笰㬭몪ᆠꋧ謤ꙫྜ稟砼虠ｴ锇憙宴蹟찙⫿苴楛쭮ަ맘�乫듞籠쯀䬩껝䪄쵭兹煼㻏飃ట쎗巊廦
৩긳䨗閈徫笽疒쾏꾬뼻繧丷ᣞ奸봒ᖒ컵뇊籿皥쵴﹆꿄�눜▫跶綦㍑㎹⟻칲֎万좬鯦�㻗贘煗䍙쾇鑝ⱑ븩뿟瑕�᷺ᶹ֚织㤸멥皵Þ珊忊䥹⼆�逹즉ැ沤푌꺳껾�ꥒ돱㾲拲鴔못폲⿸ꝃဦ좃ۢꂯ眖瘔鰌襤⺗胺ָ햂剺䍒欈Ȅ�㦔儩ᑂ铙겹垿ﻦ뼄梉ɛ잙淩觳㦶�噫䑨ӛ팢蹂︑槕劖ェ줂䷔䍲䊫頵袚图各™聐끳ం帟꾑죪뭻ꂭ㑧痟奖뷯烳쑎婌늇罖ꙓ郺鰷秦厜廌㖘嚱姧呻㰵왮綃⾆⚛絴列�벮쭕兿嚟૬屉缱
檨곢펱䭲俊켹ﾘﴯꚲ轉羮磒쌡ឞ웽⬁籎槀鎙ﹲ鲳퇴䉣慿綍陧쉩뮌⊇릨笱煟ﻟ⫶㜛Ḛ盦擄㓆䥖䄔檎ꃭ丮뮸뤯�丿먻㚦疥㞑麎엹�ꣂ௹崊鷓㣮㵌됙ﹷ臖⎸�Ⳛ慉쉾ﯜ髉鞵縶�䩻뢩太㈰習蛜醻븏ꛧᬅꞫ栶颷�䎽覉棊擏형哞쳜汱�닲ວྋۇ딥阝㙍�ｶ鼟ᛄ勎硿௴拯ᶓ䜟쾳띩⭣뭧뛈咱摞扟훢眏䦎鱸뷝ﵔ팷馌荶�띂醽ꞟ預⃙腿웨䯙巭轌婝梴啾튕輯羫⮻簷罣盶序嚗뵈敹댾쉒춵쾥ￖ폺髽ꙕ
ؿ奯塚�촯鹍筨湱龘炆薥舕詆뤝�廿晱藁댝ﳃ尼㠏鲝ᙝ헍釠럽ﹲ뷁릹❙誃禅ʫᫎ넶ぬ扨썙죄큨甸⮠臃릈֑䞍蕀㐏猑ᬲ뱏崀᭱᧲쬠⌨눴Ș뚋欹緿頊ㇻ鲠뒢禩₤ఱ࠳ꁙ胕⃭�۱탹㵅䖠镄픋吚郬苊쒢貂Պ몴ꖙ醉␡摁뱗㝧ﻷ⅀듓幟⯞뵮퍑쵩肋ﷄ퉧ꗍ䘌랏⳻묾喏╥龮퓗鴙瞬溹퓝欤牓׆�덷褎囚⾮㡏쬭協邷༃䲭�뗻ꧧꓮ쿘�ꈓ滔鿎걶មᚣ㊙�붦䷕捗燎攱쪇教ॿ濸鿳纃힊⑼襞糽磲癇嶆쳿睴伶￥
㥶ﾦ底⫮炠煌拕윎㌿㵙멐眸�㝍᧻ፉ希䯎孠쭡핽燨�쫯歋빼�匹邻峭덱⾎儹㷄柙斧캗⛂ദՄ䜑虬䱍䂢䄡퉰ᯬ躰㚉㒤欙脠⒜ᆹ蘓䂌갲ﲆ臠䍣獃ୃጓ怓ᄳ䔽岊�㹖⎗䂹❙读琢곬갥梲♝婐𣏕謁썟㟽漯뽭ꆔ㨚ㆯ觳멢１괝氷볯ི봜嗴錄㦋❯룎ឯ엵蟭缄追來돮ⴽ粏ㆷ뷢먅䔹떻♿此Ἀ�⇰⿕品찯�癭⛝듇輩ᡋ㬿橻騝콗マ偹郋猢ꥼ䖖뛲軋덢阜䷏㴽頋応挷敵涉૫覽掖㎹浿鷀䫓뜪툅睚୮屡都뽶鿐⽙뫾馈㩯眛赉洩鿅毪軧ࡉꢆ糬懈
퍝售�锡廨燎藇흷飵ꔵ㧿큞즿㑜헼⚻鹏믟등⒱̃言⍅෩攊摮瑳敲浡攍摮扯൪㔱㠱〠漠橢㰍⼼獁散瑮㠠ㄹ䄯杶楗瑤〴⼱慃䡰楥桧⁴㤶⼳敄捳湥⁴㈭㘱䘯慬獧㌠⼲潆瑮䉂硯ⵛ㘵‸㈭㘱㈠㐰‶㤶崳䘯湯乴浡⽥楔敭乳睥潒慭偮䵓⽔潆瑮敗杩瑨㐠〰䤯慴楬䅣杮敬〠䰯慥楤杮㐠⼲慍坸摩桴㈠ㄶ⼴瑓浥⁖〴启灹⽥潆瑮敄捳楲瑰牯堯效杩瑨㈠〵㸾攍摮扯൪㔱㤱〠漠橢嬍㔲‰‰‰‰‰‰‰‰㌳″㌳″‰‰㔲‰㌳″㔲‰㜲‸〵‰〵‰〵‰〵‰〵‰〵‰〵‰〵‰
〵‰〵‰㜲‸㜲‸‰‰‰‰‰㈷′㘶‷㘶‷㈷′ㄶ‱㔵‶㈷′㈷′㌳″㠳‹㈷′ㄶ‱㠸‹㈷′㈷′㔵‶㈷′㘶‷㔵‶ㄶ‱㈷′‰㐹‴‰㈷′‰㌳″‰㌳″‰〵‰‰㐴‴〵‰㐴‴〵‰㐴‴㌳″〵‰〵‰㜲‸㜲‸〵‰㜲‸㜷‸〵‰〵‰〵‰‰㌳″㠳‹㜲‸〵‰〵‰㈷′〵‰〵崰攍摮扯൪㔱〲〠漠橢㰍⼼䵂丯牯慭⽬祔数䔯瑸升慴整振㸱ാ湥潤橢ㄍ㈵‱‰扯൪㰼䈯⽍潎浲污䌯⁁⼱祔数䔯瑸升慴整㸾攍摮扯൪㔱㈲〠漠橢㰍⼼㱁⼼⽓剕⽉祔数䄯瑣潩⽮剕⡉瑨灴
⼺眯睷砮湥ⵯ慣瑮牯⽧㸩⼾卂㰼圯〠㸾䘯㐠刯捥孴〱⸵㔷㘠⸸㜱‵㈲⸹㤳㤠⸴㈷崱匯牴捵側牡湥⁴㔳匯扵祴数䰯湩㹫ാ湥潤橢ㄍ㈵″‰扯൪㰼䄯㰼匯唯䥒启灹⽥捁楴湯唯䥒栨瑴獰⼺眯睷昮獷朮癯振牡獬慢⽤灓捥敩即慴畴䱳獩⽴夵⽒〲〱㤰㤲㕟剙䍟䝁⹎摰⥦㸾䈯㱓⼼⁗㸰⼾⁆⼴敒瑣ㅛ㔰㜮‵㌱⸵ㄸ㐠㘷㤮ㄠ㈶㌮崶匯牴捵側牡湥⁴㐳匯扵祴数䰯湩㹫ാ湥潤橢ㄍ㈵‴‰扯൪㰼䄯㰼匯唯䥒启灹⽥捁楴湯唯䥒栨瑴㩰⼯敷獢楯獬牵敶牮獣甮摳潧⽶灡⽰㸩⼾
卂㰼圯〠㸾䘯㐠刯捥孴〱⸵㔷㈠㠸ㄮ‸㠲⸵ㄳ㌠㐱㜮崳匯牴捵側牡湥⁴㌳匯扵祴数䰯湩㹫ാ湥潤橢ㄍ㈵‵‰扯൪㰼䄯㰼匯唯䥒启灹⽥捁楴湯唯䥒栨瑴㩰⼯睷扥物牯⽧㸩⼾卂㰼圯〠㸾䘯㐠刯捥孴㘳⸹㘰㔠㌶㠮″㘴⸶㌴㔠〹㌮崸匯牴捵側牡湥⁴㈳匯扵祴数䰯湩㹫ാ湥潤橢ㄍ㐵‸‰扯൪㰼䐯捥摯健牡獭㰼䌯汯浵獮㔠倯敲楤瑣牯ㄠ㸲⼾楆瑬牥䘯慬整敄潣敤䤯孄㔼䕄䙁䄱䌳㔶䕁㑆㤴䘶〴䉃㜵㔱䄳䉃㸷䘼㜹㙄㜸䔶㠱䕅㐵㡁䌷㠵䅃㐲㌱ㄵ䔰㸱⽝湉潦ㄠ㌳′‰⽒
敌杮桴ㄠ㤶⼱潒瑯ㄠ㌳‴‰⽒楓敺ㄠ㐵⼹祔数堯敒⽦字‱″崱㸾瑳敲浡�嫬汫䕔블眳뮷偽桚礕䄅큀吘胀傤悡횬戇ꁝ䭀ভ豪䡆䨐䅐樰ꃐ҈弅⁑耤␆檁ڋ⅃優䆂卹楫뮷鳣㛯廤뚷ꭈ῝빟獼鳦鱹붙썲혰鰙ㄛく谮榥㎂䅣霉叼ⰳ⾹䩤⁾␥⺕ꯉ㝶鹉�黫掫ἤ�礨䯩줞ힳ䠷憾垖鱗靉弤ⅶ螵�戰즉긲錐⇦屺Ⲝ뵁鲴㌰ꖢ�눢�る㧾ⲉ嗽矢륃꣡萅릞㩔ᡶﯱ♿뷌ᒋ도쁃刌Ⲧ熑딌盢싥粳䗮枩鍔랍沖뙲켓ث䣾﹊뾳㼆㡌䷕賊뚳衸㏥讉햄៹
㺤寤鴪鉾Ꜭ䤿ᯨ쩍ꎣ컑샵ꐁ᰼鬃퇗˲ﾁ킅聟藢艢ᱣ일有ﻈ＊ಸ稫ᜲ㴩춤徽둤괁굃䍐悼稹ᠷ鍱췠ᆇ趸繸愶ℎ쪛㿀높뉬畢ꋣ㾧볮