Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutm30578 final (3)Soil Engineering Report on Compaction Testing, Tract.30578, Lots 1 through'188 and Tract 30289,: Lots 6 thr_ough 8 . , Diamond Bar, County of Los Angeles, California r:cr.bert Slone & Associates Rl,obtert Stone & Associates, Inc. Engineering Geology Soil Mechanics Foundation Studies 19720 Ventura Boulevard --- Woodland Hills, California 91364 213) 346-0565 - (2-13) 873-7382 November 5, 1970 1-68-301-10 E. L. Pearson and Associates 1551 Vest Redondo Beach Boulevard Gardena, California 90247 Subject: Soil Engineering Report on Compaction Testing, Tract 30578, Lots 1 through 188 and Tract 30289, Lots 6 through 8, Diamond Bar, County of Los Angeles California. Gentlemen: This report presents our opinions pertaining to the compacted fill placed on the subject property. Laboratory Standard ASTM : D- 3 .5 5 7-6 4T ; mo(l i f.i ed 4 inch diameter mold, 1/30 cu ft 3 layers, 25 blows per layer! 10 lb hammer, dropped 18 inches. Soil Type Maximum Dry Optimum Density Moisture psf) (o) Tan Coarse SAND 130.1 12.2Z II Tan Medium/Coarse-SAND 117.0 13.0 TT'I Tan Fine/Medium SAND 113.0 7_3•4 IV Light Brown Pine Silty SAND 113.0 14.2 V Light .Brown Sand SILT 108.5 16.7 VI Gray and Light Brown SHALE 104.0 19.6 VII Brown SILT 100.6 19.8 VIII White/Light Brown Caliche and Silty SAND 110.0 16.3 IX Red -Brown Clayey SAND 119.0 12.0 X Red --Brown Clayey Silty SAND 117.5 12.1 XI Red -Brown Clayey Sandy SILT 113.2 17.5 E. L. Pearson and Associates 1--68--301--10 November 5, 1970 Page 2 XII Dark --Brown, Silty CLAY 97.0 20.0 XIII Red --Brown Sandy SILT with Clay 115.2 13.0 XIV Fine Silty SAND and Shale 105.0 17.5 XV Fine Sandy CLAY with Shale 107.0 16.0 XVI Red --Brown and Gray Silty CLAY 99.4 19.5 XVII Tan -Brown Silty CLAY with Shale 97.3 17.4 XVIII Tan -Brown. Sandy CLAY with Shale 103.0 20.3 XIX Tan Sandy CLAY 101.0 17.0 XX Tan --Brown Sandv CLAY 103.5 19.0 XXI Tan Clayey SILT with Diatomaceous Shale 8810 27.0 PREPARATION OF NATURAL GROUND Prior to the placement of compacted fill, vegetation, brush, trees, debris, a3-)d other deleterious materials were removed. . The canyon bottoms were cleaned of .loose soils and/or alluvium as determined in the field during excavation by the supervising soils engineer. The depths of removal to firm natural ground varied from three to ten feet. Subdrains consisting of six inch diameter, perforated corrugated aluminum pipe embedded in gravel were placed as shown on the attached grading plans. METHOD OF TILL PLACEMENT Fill soils were placed in lifts of six to eight inches in thick- ness, watered as necessary to approximate optimum moisture con- tent, and compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent of the laboratory standard. Robert Stone & Associates E. L. Pearson and Associates 1-68-301.-10 i November 5, 1970 Page 3 Fill slopes were compacted by back rolling, at intervals of four feet in vertical height, with .a sheepsfoot.roller. When the slope reached design height, the entire face was rolled with overlapping passes of a sheepsfoot roller. Slope surfaces were finished under supervision by one of the following methods: grad r.o.11ing, track. rolling or trimming to firm compacted soils. EQUIPMENT Equipment used in placing the fill consisted of bulldozers, scrapers, sheepsfoot rollers and water trucks. COMPACTION TESTING AND DEPTH OF FILL Compaction test locations are shown on the attached As -Built Grading Plans prepared by E. L. Pearson and Associates. Compac- tion tests were made in each two feet of fill and the test results are shown in Table I., Compaction tests were made accord- ing to ASTM:D-1556-58T. The areas occupied by compacted fill are shown on the attached grading plans. The maximum depth of compacted fill covered by this report is about 75 feet. COMPACTED FILL BUTTRESSES AND SHEAR KEYS Compacted fill buttresses were emplaced on the following Lots: 11, 12, 15--18, 44, 70-74 and 76-80. Shear keys were emplaced on the following Lots: 47-55, 58-69 and 170-176. RESTRICTED USE AREAS Restricted use areas occur on the following Lots: 15-17, 35--43, 46-55, 58-69 and 168-181. E. L. Pearson and Associates 1--68-301-10 November 5, 1970 Page 4 EXPANSION TESTS Expansion tests were performed on typical samples of material obtained from the finished lots. These tests measure the verti- cal linear expansion of soil specimens remolded to a relative compaction of 90 percent of the laboratory standard. The speci- mens are remolded at optimum moisture content. The specimens are allowed to air-dry for 24 hours. They are then placed in the testing devices and water is added to simulate a saturated condition. The specimens are placed under_ a surcharge of 60 lb/sq ft and in accordance with the County of Los Angeles standards. The percent swell is then measured when expansion ceases, normally in 24 hours. The results of the expansion tests are as follows: Sample No. Percent Swell Under 60 psf Load) A -Sandy Clay 9.50 B-Sandstone 2.50 C-Siltstone 4.90 D-Sandy Clay 10.00 E-Clayey Sand 1.60 F-Sandy Clay 4.85 A lot by lot breadkown of the various soil types is given in Table II. R,ohert Stone & Associates E. L. Pearson and Associates 1-68-301-10 November 5, 1970 Wage 5 SOIL BEARING PRESSURES Recommended bearing pressures for-desing of continuous foundations and shallow pier foundations placed at the recommended depths are as follows: Firm Natural Soil Compacted Fill Bedrock 1000 lSs/sq ft 1500 lbs/sq ft 2000 lbs/sq ft Recommended bearing pressures for design of caissons is 3000 lbs/sq ft at the recommended depth. These values may be increased by 1/3 in designing seismic forces and wind loads. RECOMMENDED LATERAL PRESSURES Recommended active pressures to be -considered in the design of retaining walls are as f-allows: Surface Slope of Equivalent Retained Material* Fluid Weight Horz. to Vert. lb/cu ft LEVEL 30 2 to 1 43 1-, to 1 55 1 to 1 80 Recommended passive pressures to be considered in design are as follows: Robevt Stone & Associates E. L. Pearson and Associates November 5, 1970 Soil Type Firm Natural Soil Compacted Fill Bedrock 1-68-301-10 Page 6 Equivalent Fluid Weight lb/cu ft 250 350 400 A coefficient of .friction between the soil and concrete founda- tions of 0.4 may be assumed. GENERAL FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS A lot by lot analysis of the tract has been made with reference to foundation design. The analysis included a breakdown .into various categories by interrelating the type of earth materials and their expansion qualities, and the angle of slopes on the lots. The analysis was applied to what appears to be the most probable building area on each. lot. Thn results of the analysis are presented in Table II. Where more than one type of foundation category is shown in Table II, the building official can determine the applicable design criteria based on the location of the structures. E. L. Pearson and Associates November 5, 1970 II Foundations in Natural Soils A. Slope of Building Area •- 3:1 or Flatter 1-68-301-10 Page 8 1. Foundations should be designed according to the table given above under Section I. 2. Foundation excavations should be inspected by a soils engineer to determine the suitability of the soils to provide the recommended bearing capacity and to verify the expansive soil condi- tions. B. 512pe of Building Area - St.eeer than 3:1 to 2:1 1. Exterior and Interior Foundations: Continuous foundations ALA bcd o::".k r 12 inctop minimum for one -- story buildings and 18 inches minimum for two -- story buildings. Reinforced according to the following table: Expansiveness 0% to 80 8 to 12 Wall Reinforcement 1 -- * 4 @ top and bottom 2 - 04 @ top and bottom 2. Pier Foundations: 18 inches minimum into bedrock 3. Bearing Surface: The depths of penetration given above should be obtained in firm bedrock that is unaffected by creep. Robert Sion s & Associates E. L. Pearson and Associates :!-68--301--10 November 5, 1970 Page 7 I Foundations in Compacted Fill Pads or Pads Excavated in Bedrock. SLAB CONSTRUCTION -- - EXPANSIVENESS DEPTH OF SLAB WALL THICKNESS OF ROCK Swell)_ FOOTING; REINFORCEMENT REINFORCEMENT BASE OR CLEAN BELOW 4" NORMAL SAND UNDER LIVING 60 ps.f LOAD FINISH THICKNESS AREA AND MOISTUP.E AIR-DRY TO GRADE BARRIER SATURATION D o to 3 d 12" 6"x6 °-10/10 Wire Mesh Optional TM` 6-Fail Visqueen 1" Sand. over Visqueen 30 to 8% 2311 6"x6"-10/10 1 - #4 @ top 4" + 6-mil Visqueen Wire Mesh and Bottom 1" Sand over Visqueen U.0 to 120 H: t- Cp r 1_lGn6crG/I Wire Mesh and Bottom 1" Sand over 1 4Visque 1. — - WOOD FLOOR _TYPE CONSTRUCTION EXPANSIVENESS DEPTH OF ~ . WALL - CONTINUOUS PIERS Swell) FOOTING REINFORCEMENT INTERIOR 60 psf LOAD BELOW BEARING AIR-DRY' TO GRADE WALL,13 GRADE SATURATION 0% to 3% l2r' Optional Piers As per Code ry u ------------. _ Allowed — - 3% to 8% 18% 1 - #4 @ top -1 - #4 @ top Not Permitted and bottom and bottom Under Bearing I Walls 8% to 12% i 24" 2 - #4 or. 2 - #4 @ top Not Permitted 1 - #6 @ top and bottom Under Bearing and bottom --. Walls On the lots leaving soils that are over three percent expansive, surface drainage and drainage of planters should be provided so that no water_ is allowed to enter the subsoils in or adjacent to the building area. Robert Stone & Associates E. L. Pearson and associates 1-68-301-10 November 5, 1970 Pagc 9 4. InspCtions: The foundation excavations should be inspected by a soils engineer and an engineering geologist to determine the suitability of the bed- rock and to verify the expansive soil conditions . C. Slope of Building Area - Steeper than 2:1 to 1' :l 1. Exterior: and Interior Foundations: Continuous foundations into bedrock a minimum of 24 inches and the outer edge of the footing should be a min 4.rL,um horizontal distance of five feet from the slope face. The footings should be reinforced with a minimum of two No. 4 reinforcing bars placed at the top and bottom of the footings. 2. Ca l sore FOundationS: Thai E c f cct minirlum into bed -rock. Tied together by grade beams. 3. Bearing Surface: The depths of penetrat1on given above should be obtained in firm bedrock that is unaffected by creep. 4. Creep Forces: These foundations should be designed to resist a nominal creep force of 1000 pounds per foot of soil and creep affected materials penetrated. 5. Inspections: The foundation excavations should be inspected by a soils engineer and an engineering geologist to determine the suitability of the bed- rock and to verify the expansive soil. conditions. Robes yfor[ & /-_—ss c ciaCes E. L. Pearson and Associates 1-68-301-10 November 5; 1970 Page 10 I:CI Spec:i.al Design Conditions The foundation plans should be reviewed by a soils engineer and an engineering geologist for the following conditions: A. Foundations on Cut, Fill and Natural Soils Any combination of two or more) D. Foundations Encroaching on Stgbillzation Installations C. Foundations on Slopes Steeper than 11:1 R"'o,b ed ikSCp Associates E. L. Pearson and Associates 1-68-301-10 November 5, 1970 Page 11 RECOA7MMATIONS CONCERNING ADDITIONAL GRADING 1. On lots where cuts are proposed in excess of three feet in vertical height or where cuts are proposed (any height) that would undercut a dip slope or bedding plane inclination as shown on the geologic map, a grading plan review by an engineering geologist is recommended. 2. If additional grading is proposed on any lot where stabiliza- tion installation exists a grading plan review by a soils engineer and engineering geologist is recommended. 3. Wherever proposed grading (primarily filling) would increase driving forces above an existing stabilization device (even if on another lot) a grading plan review by a soils engineer and engineering geologist is rccoi;m<ended. 4. When a grading permit is required, recommendations concerning additional proposed grading sucl-, as, fill placement, cleanouts, cut orientation and slope construction should be made when the proposed grading is known. 5. in all other cases Los Angeles County requirements concerning issuance of grading permits should apply. Very truly yours, ROI3ERT STONE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Enclosures: Gerald Gorian, R 14698 Grading Plan Grading Certificates Table 1, and Table 11 Distribution: 4 Client 2 County of L. A. Dept. of Bldg. & Safety and Geology Section) Robert Stone & Associates COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARIM ENT OF COUNTY ENGINEER BUILDING AND SAFETY DI V[ SI oN LIPERVISiED GRADING INSPECTION CERTIFICATE To be filed in duplicate at the local Building and Safety Office) Job Address 30289 Diamond. Baror2.cact No. Locality Owner Transamerica' Developpent Permit No. ROUGH GRADING CERTIFICATION LXJ BY SOILS ENGI NELR A) I certify that the earth fills placed on the following lots were installed upon competent and properly prepared base material and compacted in compliance with requirements of Building Code Section 7010. I further certify that where the report or reports of an engineering geologist, relative to this site, have recommended the installation of buttress fills or other similar stabilization measures, such earthwork construction has been completed in accordance with the approved design. LOT NOS. 6 through 8 See report dated 11/ 5 / 7 0 for compaction test data, recommended allowable soil bearing values and other special recommendations. EXPANSIVE SOILS (YES) (NO) LOT Nos. ALL BUTTRESS FILLS (YES) (NO) LOT NOS. AT,T. _ Remarks Engineer ` - Reg. No. 14698 Date 11 mature Gerald Gorj an C :BY SUPERViS.LNG (;AADING ENGINEER B) I certify to the satisfactory completion of rough grading including: grading to approximate final elevations; property lines located and staked; cut and fill slopes correctly graded and located in accordance with the approved design; swales and terraces graded ready for paving; berms installed; and required drainage -slopes provided on the building pads. I further certi- fy that where report or reports of an engineering geologist and/or soils engineer have been prepared relative to this site, the recommendations contained in such reports have been followed in the prosecution of the work. LOT NOS. -- Remarks Engineer _ Reg. No. Date Signature F1 FINAL GRAD114G CERTIFICATION C) I certify to the satisfactory completion of grading, in accordance with the approved plans. All required drainage devices have been installed; slope planting established and irrigation systems provided (where required);and adequate provisions have beer, made for drainage of surface waters from each building site. The recommendations of the soils engineer and/or engineering geologist (if such persons were employed) have been incorporated in the work. LOT NOS. Remarks _ Engineer Reg. No. _ Date Signature EPARTNENT USE ONLY: teport approved by toms approved: Tract No. Title Permit No. Date Date 01101-V OW 11 hJl;l,lt R111:HV1 (1,Xrj (;liA M N ; I N;>i'I?C11110.1 (".f':R'1'1 To be filed i11 duplical.0 aL thi, .l.oca Buii.ding and ,;arot-y Office) Job Addr(!s or Tract No. 30578 l,acality _Diamond Bar Owner `Transamerica DevelopTlent Permit Ido. ROW311 GRAM IM CER` 1F1CAT] ON Ed BY SOILS ENGINEER A) T certify that the earth fills placed on the followin;, lots .;ere Installed upon competent and projwrly prepared base material and compacted in compliance with rec{ui.r•emc-nt.s of 13u]ldirfg C:odr, Section 7010. 1 further certify that where the report or reports of an engineering gf^ologist, relative to this site, have recommended the installation of buttress fills or other similar stabilization measures, such earthwork construction has been completed in accordance with the approved design. LOT NOS. 1 through 188 See report dated 11Z /70 for compaction test data, recommended allowable soil hearing values and other special recommendations. EXPANSIVE SOILS (YES) (NO) LOT PdOS. See Report BUTTRESS FILLS (1TES) 0,10) LOT NOS. See Re2o_r•h Remarks Engineer r _ Reg.' No. ---.469_8 Date 11.15.Zlo SJgratore) Gerald Gorima BY SUPERVISING GRADING ENGINEER W T. certify to the satisfactory completion of rough grading including: grading to approximate final elevations; property lines located and staked; cut and fill slopes correctly graded and - located in accordance with the approved design; swales and terraces graded ready for paving; berms installed; and required drainage slopes provided on the building pads. I further certi- fy that where report or reports of an engineering geologist and/or soils engineer have been prepared relative to this site, the roe onimendations contained in such reports have beeri followed in the prosecution of the work, LOT NOS. Remarks Engineer Reg. No. Date Signature Ll FIAiAL GRADIIIG CETITIFICATTON Cc) I certify to the satisfactory completion of grading in accordance with the approved plans. All required drainage devices have been installed; slope planting established and irrigation systems provided (where required);and adequate provisions have been made for drainage of surface waters from each building site. The recommendations of the soils engineer arm/or engineering geologist (if such persons were employed) have been incorporated in the work. LOT IIOS. Remarks Engineer Reg. Na. Date Si i;ira Lurc ) DPPAIVITIL.II'.l USE ONLY: Tract Wo. Permit No. Date T i Report: approved by __ 9'i.tle _, i Date 13 c1 I- 1 -1 Ga I I Cr U U U I I E U U. 1 I l I ! r I ! H O' p1 C2 C)l r-II (-I n- 0 m U U U U U U I r 1 1 1 ! I 1 ! I C " i p l M fill r I Y r 1 1 F .I t r'4 ri F+e C' U) a OIrsi0) H H H 1--i U U U :; H H I-i F H H F I H H \\ H H Pq H" H H H Q U H 1-I t-i 1-4 O Cis \ F -1 H W I H H Fa; j r I cam) n :I, Ln LD I- co rn C) H N m v+ Isi .O n co c-= o 1-f rrfC'! N (--A' ('1 C 4 N N N N rq r) r1 r•) r-) rtnIO Sri wa w HI r4- f", rfrf Q) _4. U P"•,: I} k I 1 i• I r (:, I t I 1 1 I i ! r ! S 1 I W UJ C-+ A O I IT) kA • r-i 0) far tG R1 W: 1 i r- FI{ =f ry' "4 rS r`'y IC r ti r f Fii Fr Ky Cf - O i-i H H v !7 * a 1-'r+' G!a n-I rr, rj I I H H 10 w( H H H !-I H P1 H H FI H H l I t H H H H ol, r d-) I H F-I Viz: F S I-i U I N C 7 =1• i-r) le7 I LO 0) C) r-i N LO :r, I', CC) a', C) 4-3 r-i rA r--I -{ r i r i rI rl I r I C'r O I I I Fat SIT 1s •r-I E fp 1~ R: f rr-) I I<I G p Q 4-1 0 ro G-) i H 1-I H H F -! H H H H F-{ H H H H H F-[ H H H Id 0 i-•i I H H H i H H H H I I 1-1 H H H I3 F-I H F-t F--I 1- H 1-4 H H H H H H H H 1^I H H s rd O U a z 7 ! O C` F ri C\ UI -' LC) rD al 0) C-D r-{ CV cJ Ln V CO i. CD H k) U SJ " tY? t7 lU LD I• r-- i— 00 P-F I•x, PLi r. 5i GA a I''! P-1 U)i 1 F: rCS C3 rd I r I UJr- 1 4-1 01 H FF rd of m a.I ri; \ H 9 rr (1) r 1 H. 1-1 4 -) y F-1 I H i I- ; H H F -1 H H F--1 H H H F--S I F H 7 rt; F-t 4 H H F-I H F I H H H H H H H H ijr H O! r3 IN C 7 rY U) "D i G al 1:1) i -I C') r'i -V Lrl l--o [ CO G1 n rJ •-34 r,,i •=Y° '3' ' .i : F' if i If1 Ln in in I.0 Ln v) L, f LrI k r r E-t r-; r-I O 00 19 P1 r 1^^ 4` ti- riIImo) 4r-I x Ac a F O yf K H H H H P; I'1 Ln H N H FI F-i I -I H H l- 1 H H P O f I-i FA H F I H F i 1-i ray C.) H H 1-4 H H 1-4 H KQ H H Hr; f<< tir CI Fi 41 1-4 FA 11 I-: H i I H l ro H H H H H H W w hf i•-I H T r-i 1I C`"1 T3' Lrl V r co O> rj r3 CV Cr'i r in tU I- D;) Cl O la C) C C] CD C.> C> CJ C r 1 r-1 r--i r-1 r-'i rA rl r-1 r 1 r-I N O H r--I r-I r 1 r-1 I I r-1 r-i I i - ' r-1 r-I r d r-I rl r-I r -1 r! r-i a r-1 C) Iri rl•r-I E 1 I 1 I [1 fir [t- ! I I 1 I 1 I [ ! 1 1 WILD rl O z W, U o O S; 01 :1 I U U U i I 1 I I I I I i I I I I I I Ci i; r j 3 •ri r)) Ji P N U) rci ;s O ri I ;? r1 Ql O 3 1 twl F Ci CIJ 1--I Lr r-14 r rl i y `\ r+ m r4 pri rC U 1 H F-i H H 1-1 F--i 1-1 H F--1 F-I F-I H. H F{ I -I 1-1 H I -I H C' 4-) 0 H I-_1 H i-1 F-I 1-1 H 1-1 H H F-1 H H F-•i 1-1 H H H i rG OA 1- H Ci U I j N rl i+ lr1 k,., r- co m c) r-1 c . rr, v m k-r) r— oo c) C7 IJ CO OU M X3 m Ct, CY) M rfJ vi Gl 2, l O'l G % G\ 03 M Cl c„ O HMI j I SL'•r: i E f k i I i I I 1 I S I 1 1 L} u raj ' 1 r4 hf ti r-i 4-1 a F r Pr F=I Fxl PA PL4 F•a 4 W f4 44 kr f- G-! i•JJ N I-- -1 FT-1 LI) r f7 U m 04 al S H 0 I-1 H F-S f-i H H 1-{ H H H H H ri Q4 H H H H H H H ti 1 H H H H i-1 H r"! 1-i 1--1 H H H G .a-J C U L Y4 r-a N rO Ln lrJ f- VJ CSC O r4 N M Vr) l0 W 6\ CJ h-i 4-1 rp t c;< may, z:, zll 41 J' Uf) U) If) Lf) Lr) Ll) U) Ln Lr) Lf) to I i I r-4 r-I r-i H r -1 r-1 r-1 r i 7-1 r-1 r-i r 'I L-4 i C1 r-S U.1 t? • r{ ry Fy r f l 1 f I f I I i E LO E JI I Y ul V V 1 l 10 0y 14 U, r--i I i f i l i 1 W F-1 FTq W W TTI F4 W U : rU-' 4-1 P4 U) P A r-•i S UI U} s cl o W .H J rti 1. O Fl,' f 1 FG r; a; 44 N Tl l Ft4 4-i 1l4 SH w N U), Pi Qi k H ro ro Q i>- H 44 k 1 I 4I 14 14 43 U f, 4-J F F A i 1-1 H H 1-1 I -I H H R i H H F--1 H h I III r-I 1--I H 1-1 F-I H r, A rV C') my ul lQ C- 03 M W A CN M UI Lo I— co cm CJ a3I N fN N C`•! Cq rV Cd C`1 rrl M Cr) rg v) of q r" in Al J' 1 —Ii O. 1! OO CO C:i C* CO CO CO 00 rI — .-A r1 H U C? U U U U i.) I I I I S Pa fi i I E l I I rT F4 r O >1 rl - I I CS h; 04 H rc, 'O D rG QJ I-1 H ~I ;, !-! ;; H R r{I F-q H H H H H H H I-i 1--; tM 4-1 I--f H O U Ixxa H H O ems. r I C I (n '71 Lfl k,) 1— CO Sl r1 ri C I f? 7 Ls') lrj a, fj n v; w to Elo _O D lli i.. -- I_ , [ - i' r• c I-- c TABLE 1 RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS JOBNO— ...... ......... Ov b 11370 DATE OF REPORT ............ TEST DATE TEST MOISTURE UNIT DRY RELATIVE SOIL NO• ELEV. CONTENT. DENSITY COMPACTION TYPE Ft) M LBS./CU.FT.) M 9 5'c 1,7 5-0 957 960 2 960 9 5-G 95-7 9(14 9 G 107-5 77 967 9( 61 97:) Robert Stone & Assoclatcs 000713) TABLE I RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS JOB NO. . w ` TEST DATE TEST MOISTURE UNIT DRY NO. ELEV. CONTENT DENSITY Ft) LBS. /CU. r- T. 962- 965 97/ SM 3 972 74 7 9 76 9711974 7 6, F) 41 97G 7/ 97 7 9 7 7 SOIL TYPE DATE OF REPORT. I RELATIVE COMPACTION COO IVe R o b c r t Stork `r A s & C; c i tat- 0 s TABLE 1 RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS J 0 B N 0 TEST DATE TEST MOISTURE UNIT PRY. NO. ELEV CONTENT DENS ITY- p6) (LBS./CU.FT.) 79( 1 A 97(o 6/ X-5 Z l, v1Z l/ 979 900 Z, Ll 90/ T NIGV 5 1970 DATE OF REPORT... ........ RELATIVE COMPACTION M SOIL TYPE Roberl.- Stone & Associates T A B L RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS JOB NO.. 5 70 DATE OF REPORT. HV - ..19.. - TEST DATE TEST MOISTURE UNIT DRY RELAT:WE NO. ELEV. CONTENT DENSITY COMPACTION Ft) M LBS./CU.FT.) 96) av g e) 2- 2 1Z I Z 9 a F7 6 S) a ax) 9 F n 9 8 9 SOIL TYPE Rolaert Sotonc, & Associates JOB NO.. .............. TEST DATE NO. I TABLE 1 RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS TEST MOISTURE ELEV. CONTENT Ft) 3 2 UNIT DRY, DENSITY LBS./CU.FT.) 5DATEOFPXPORT- NOV '.-1970 .- RELATIVE COMPACTION SOIL' TYPE Robert Stone & A TABLE 1 jbB NO.. .......... TEST NO. DATE TEST MOISTURE, ELEV, CONTENT Ft) M 9 c) i L991 9 7 IS; 9 -29 q!) 994, UNIT DRY DENSITY LBS./CU.FT.) 5 . .1970 DATE OF RtEPORT—,NOV .....,— RELATIVE COMPACTION M SOIL TYPE Robert Stone & Aclsocicates TABLE 1 RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS j0f3 NO—— .......... TEST M 0 1 S T U 1 U] ELEV. CONTENT Ft) N) 045 411 3X e" zii Al t c c r-) xt"? 0o C.o 0o c" t UNIT DRY DENSITY LBS./CU.FT.) v ' 70 DATE OF No19 REPORT. . ......... RELATIVE COMPACTION 56) soil, TYPE v TABLE I RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS OB N()V r, jp() J NO. ........... DATE OF R.EPORT..........., TEST DATE TEST NO. -ELEV'. Ft) 4. ra 94c, 00/ 0 0 9 G MOISTURE CONTENT UNIT DRY DENSITY LBS./CU.FT.) RELATIVE soil, COMPACTION TYPE 96) 1 ftobc-rl- Stone & Ikssociatcs TABLE I RESULTS 017 COMPACT,10N TESTS JOB No ........... TEST DATE TEST NO. ELEV. Ft) 2 96G, 1 J I' C / f 6, r, 7 99 2.. Y A 9c) J 1 . w 997 m 0 1 s T uREl CONTENT M UNIT DRY DEN,51TY LBS./CU.FT.) A ) Al A91 3 0 119170DATEOFREPORT. M . ` ...... RELATIVE COMPACTION 9.) e7 22L SOIL TYPE j J! Robert Stone 4,' AsSoci"-tcs TABLE I JOB NO..' TEST DATE TEST NO. ELEV. Ft) 9,14 lol2-,. X, IcW4ZZL- 0/2 0/2 10110 RESULTS OF COMPACTION.TESTS I MOTSTUPE, CONTENT 11.) UNIT DRY DENSITY LBS. /CU. FT.) AL 41 Ile, 9 16 NOV 5 1970 DATE OF REPORT —'. — .... RELATIVE SOIL COMPACTION TYPE Robert Stone & AssoClalg-.ci JOB NO.. TEST NO. DATE TABLE 1 RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS TEST MOISTURE, ELEV. CONTENT Ft) 991 9-C)s T7 UNIT DRY DENSITY LBS./QU.FT.) NOV.s 1970DATEOFRE -PORT .......... RELATIVE COMPACTION 910 77 X Robert stone "I, Associa, -'s TABLE I TOR N 0 .. . . . . . . . . . . TEST DATE NO. lVi"-111 IL A 1) 60 14; As RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS TEST WISTURE ELEV. CONTENT Ft) M 941 9 41 9, A 9 4 0 4 2- UNIT DRY DENSITY LBS./CU.FTa) DATE OF REPORT .7 Y% . jQVQ RELAT'lVE COMPACTION 96) SOIL TYK 7X- TABLE I TEST DATE TEST NO. ELEV. Ft) C4 41. 0 016 c RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS MOISTURE, UNIT DRY CONTENT. - DENSITY LBS6/ CU.FT.) NOV 5 1970 DATE OF REPORT ....... -. RELATIVE SOIL COMPACTI. ON TYPE 0--) Robert Stotme & TABLE I JOB 1 0. 9 ........ TEST NO. DATE RBSULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS TEST MOISTURE, ELEV. CONTENT Ft) M I ro, UNIT DRY DENSITY LDSP/CU.FT.) f-y Nov s 1",70 DATE OF REPORT. — ........ RELATIVE COMPACTION 0) SOIL TYPE Ir Robert Stone &, A.,,Ociatcs JOB NO— ....... TEST NO. DATE I TEST ELEV. Ft) TABLE I RESULT'S OF COMPACTIONTESTS I MOLSTUPJ] CONTENT M UNIT DRY DENSITY LBS./ CU.FT.) z l/ d DATE OF REPORT. P CTA . AM . . RELATIVE. COMPACTION 9.) SOIL TYPE JI, Roboart Stone &, A,soc ate" TABIX I RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS JOB NO... . a e'...... . TEST NQ. DATE TEST ELEV. Ft) MOISTURE CONTENT M A - UNIT DRY DENSITY. 1,BS./CU.FT.) DATE OF REPORT. f OV. AN - RELATIVE COMPACTION 61) SOIL TYPE Tz" Robert SWnOl S-, Associates TABLE I RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS JOB NO m ....b .... TEST DATE TEST MOISTURE UNIT DRY NO. ELEV. CONTENT DENSITY.' Ft) LBS./CU.FT.) 3 6 NN F) 1970 DATE OF REPORT— .... a .. RELATIVE COMPACTION 96) V SOIL TYPE Robert Slone &, AGsociatcas TABLE I 6JOB140. . fl? .... TEST NO. DATE TEST ELEV. Ft) 947 9 y7 RESULTS OF COMPACTION TE0173TS MOISTURE. CONTENT 01) 2 UNIT DRY DENSITY LBS.,/CU.FT.) NOV 'r, 191M DATE OF REPORT -.....- RELATIVE COMPACTION SOTS, TYPE Robert Stone & Assodatc s JOBNO.,, ,(( ...,,z,z., TES1. DATE 0, TABLE 1 RESULTS 02 COMPACTION TESTS TEST `MOIS22IRE BLE7. CONTENT Ft) M UNIT DRYy DENSITY: 8S,/CO,2I,) ROV §]R DATE OF REPORT ........... RELATIVE COMPACTION SOIL 772E Robert Stone & A;50 CiJte% TABLE I RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS NOV 1970DATEOFJODNO ....... I MOISTURE CONTENT q J Ll It/ 5 C/, 0 810 Al UNIT DRY DENSITY LBS,/CU.FT.) RELATIVE SOIL COMPACTION TYPE 516) f?.obcrt Slon(! -1, Associates TABLE I RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS. JOB NO. TEST 1\1 0 DATE TEST MOISTURE ELEV. CONTENT Ft) (%) 973 2 7 Z s 7 9 cne 92 6, 2 UNIT DRY DENSITY LBS./CU.FT.) 61, NOV 5 1970 DATE OF REPORT........... RELATIVE COMPACTION SOIL TYPE Robert Sion e l, Associall-es i'1;13LE I RESULTS OF COIMPACTION '.VESTS N(JV 5 Wo DATE 0).' REPORT. ... e . , . . VEST DAM 'VEST MOISTURE UNIT DRY RELATIVE SOIL No. ELEV. CON`I'ENT DENSITY C01,1PAC`_ ION TYPE Et) ( j (LBS./Ct).FT. r t c 1 T A B L I " I RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS lio— JOB . . . . . . TEST DATE TEST mPols"ullMUNIT DRY No. ELEV. CONTENT DENSITY Ft) LBS./ CUrT.) 7) 92 e) 7 71 0 DATE Or REPORTM'"'.. 197 RELATIVE COMPACTION 16 ) SOIL TYPE TN/ V p" obert Stone S-, Associates TABLE I JOB NO.— f ..` ` d .. a aF0 .4 TEST ELEV. Ft) RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS MOISTUPE CONTENT UNIT D%Y DENSITY LBS . /CU . FT . ) DATE OP REPORTNOV r. . RELATIVE SOIL COMPACTION TYPE M Robert +' Lonle Sir Associ.a.tec. TABLE I- J70 B x10 TEST DATE NO Ld- A RE,SULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS TEST MOISTURE- ELEV. CONTENT pt) M 6— HrMf 6 1970 DATE OF REPORT ....... UNIT DRY RELATIVE DENSITY- COMP7-CTINO L)3S./CU.FT .) _I 171 7 Soil" TYPE T Robert SWne &., TABLE I J013 .. .......... TEST`— DATE TEST NO ELEV. Ft) RE]SULTS Or! COMPACTION TESTS MOISTURE CONTENT P6 ) UNIT DRY DENSITY 1,13S o /CU o FT. I'd f I, f `' `,-.a..-_ fi I 1. rQ.., r xa,a.,,.. 4....m- w ,.«.a-. -w.s- NOV 5 1970 DATE OF REPORT .... RELATIVE SOIL COMPACTION TYPE 2T J e.E J Robc-ri TABLE' 1, RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS DPTB' Or REPORT. l O.V"'j MOISTURE UNIT DRY. RELATIVE SOIL CONTENT DENTSITY. COMPACTION TYPE LBS,/CU.FT.) a w'_r .. tea.. ..Y i %I i 1 a-./ bt R o b c r t S e. S4 'k s, st, 't 0 s TABLE I J013 Nom TEST NO. RESULTS W COMPACTIOtq TESTS DATE' TEST MOISTURE ELEV. CONTENT Ft) U-N, IT DRY' . DENSITY LBS./CU.FT,,) DATE OF REPORT.NOV RELATIVE SOIL COMPACTION TYPE J- Ac X-5 7 0 C) 01 A 1Y Mg. Robort Stone S,-, Associcatc-F, JOB1\10. o 0 o s o 6 a ........ TEST DATE TEST ELEV. 14 78 p'la I RESULTS OF COMPACTION Tl'-STS MOISTURE CONTENT a) UNIT DRY DENSITY ( LBS.,/CU,FT.) f// F f / C-rl ,% 7" 0 DATE OP REPORT.H 0 V 5 — l— 19... RELATIVE COMPACTION soill TYPE R o, 1.) c r o n A sss o c iall c-, s TABLE J- J, 0 JB NO.. and®P.... TEST N . 0. DATE RESIJLT` OF COMPACTION TESTS TEST MOTSTUR'l-, UNIT DRY E LEV. CONTENT DENSITY, Ft) (LBS/CUaFT.) DATE OF REPORT— Nolv.— RELATT.VP COMPAC' , PION 000. ) SOIL' TABLE' .1 JOB NO. ............. TEST DATE TEST NO. ELEV. Ft) I'A 11-17 v/ 1. RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS mo-rSTUPI.E, CONTENT UNIT DRY DENSITY LBS./ClJ.FT.) Nov 5- 'Wo DATE OF RBPORTP ..... I.. RELATIVE COMPACTION 96) Robc,rt Stone S4 Associ(-',,t-es TA11TX I RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS JOB NO. DATE OF REPOI:T .. 5 , .1... - TEST DATE TESm i IO1STURE ' UNIT T?I2Y RELATIVE SOIL NO. ELEV. CONTENT - DENSITY COMPACTION TYPE Sri_.) LBS./CU.PT.) (l tip, . Y r.e.o.- ji • r - Cam° '} r., J Robert Stone & Assocl.-tef TABLE I JOB NO TEST DATE No. RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS TEST MOISTURE' ELEVd CONTENT Ft) (96) UNIT DRY Dr;,NSITY LBS./CU.FT.) NOV r DATE OF REPORT-- RELATIVE COINIPACTION 96) 3.2 611 -7? 05-7 97 93 94 7 q SOIL TYPE llobort Stonc! & AsS o c i ", 11 c! s c JOB NO.. ............ TEST NO. DATE TEST ELEV. Ft) TABLE RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS M07STURE CONTENT 1101-) UNIT DRY DENSITY LBS./CU.FT.) DATE OF REPORT I V-'r). ' f " Rl!ZA T IVE, SOIL COMPACTION I-1lypB IAO C) 7 j V 11/1 V Rc)l-)(,,rt Stone S, Associt-l't-es 0 TABL ]; 1. JUB NO..:` ............. RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS NOV 5 -1970 DATE OF REPORT......:. TEST DATE PEST MOISTURE UNIT DRY RELATIVE SOIL NO., ELEV. CONTENT i DENSITY COMPACTION TYPE: Ft) M LBS . /CLJ . FT. o ) 3, 7 3 ZT 6 7 rl 7 o n ice i"`,'` J.: . o, i .• 1! 12.1 q_1 57 61Q o.7 0 7, '2 7r_ C J V Robcrt Stone S-. Associ.tes TABLE 1 RESULTS OF CU MPAC,TION TESTS JOB NO....(' ..... f.. . DATE OF REPORT. fit»'. ; , .i370 . TEST DATE TEST MOISTURE UNIT DRY RELATIVE SOIL NO. ELEV. CONTENT I DENSITY COMPACTION TYPE Ft) M I (LBS./CU.FT.) o) VT J r.....'.. ro 17 Robcrt Stone &, AssOciutcs TABLE I RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS JOBNO. . . . . . • . TEST DATE TEST MOISTURE No. ELEV. CONTENT Ft) 11,4 C) 73 12,1 P -7 7, 81 0 3 //,7 UNIT DRY DENSITY LBS./CU.FT.) DATE OF REPORT..... . RELATIVE S( COMPACTION 7! C-1) Tr CN L7- 77 9 2- 7TT 5 3 TT 10Z 97 Robert 'Sfonc & Associates TABLE _t l3FSU7,TS OF COMPACTION TESTS r JOBNO... ............. TEST DATE TEST MOISTURE NO. ELEV. CONTENT Et) try DATE OF P.PORT .......1970.. 1.. ` UNIT DRY RELATIVE SOIL Iy DENSITY COMPACTION TYPE 1LBS./ CV ..l'TT T. 3 ( a} 7 I 7T Robert Stone & AssOci :tes TABLE 1 I RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS JOB NO... r 4 DATA'. OF REPORT..'......... fi TEST DATE TEST MOISTURE UNIT DRY RELATIVE NO: ELEV . CONTENT DENSITY COIMPACTION Ft) (LDS./CU.FT.) (%) 97/ 7r) ft ffy' f t G-rt r Elf 1 97,1 Il, f i 977 /,f7 yi. if 9 '7 1 f ram, •s A7 ci I . rPe, S7 SOIL TYPE 177 ram"'' . a, ...,.... I1C, 1 f q S 02 ql Ca 3Z, C4 Robert Stone S Associate. TABLE I RESULTS OP COMPACTION TESTS JOB NO . `. ........... . 70 DATE OF REPORT . PuoV ...1... . TEST DATE TEST MOISTURE UNIT DRY RELATIVE SOIL NO. ELEV. CONTENT DENSITY C0I,11PACTION TYPE PT) LBS./CU.FT.) ( o12, 7311 11 T ffn 3 LJ `-1 i.;7 cr f J 2, c) o y i I ... Robcrt Stone & Associates RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS JOB No, DATE OF REPORT Y 5 , . 1970. . TEST DA.TTi, TEST MOISTURV UNIT DRY RELATIVE SOIL i NO. ELEV. CONTENT DENSITY COMPACTION TYPE Ft) LBS . /CU . FT . ) Lla T 1 10 r 'r cjp IT Rob rt S-tone & AssoclaECs TABL.T', I RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS JOB NO... NOV 5 1970 - DATE OF REPORT ........... TEST DATE TEST MOISTURE, ul,,I,P, Dliy RELATWE NO. ELEV, CONTENT DENSITY COMPACTION Ft). (LBS./CU.FT.) 90 7- 7 2- ft. a 7 7 ol SOIL TYPT' TABLE I RrSULTS Or COMPACTION TLSTS JOB NO. . ........ .... DATE OF REPORT, NOV.C.. 197Q . . 1 TEST DATE TEST ASOISTURE UNIT DRY RELAT-WD SOIL NO. ELEV • CONT'ENT DENSITY COMPACTION TYPE Ft) ( ) {LBS . /CU . Ft { ) f , 1 IdIL lr 6--' n r; 4 J 1. r! fir, ' (i' i l.: ._ s •- _ "1,'-- Robert Stone & Assoei4aecs TABL}] a RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS JOBNU... ,.. TEST_ DATE TEST MOISTURE NO. ELEV. CONTENT t (Ft) i M UNIT DRY DENS ITiY. LBS./CU.ET.) DATE OF REPORT h'. ...1.... . RELATIVE COMPACTION M SOIL TYPE r f tic << jj Robert 'Stone & Associates TABLE I RESULTS---01F -COMPACTION TESTS JOBNO............`.... TEST DATE TEST MOISTURE UNIT DRY NO. ELEV. CONTENT DENSITY Ft) W (LBS./CU,FT.) DATE OF REPORT AGY.5.. 1970... RELATIVE COMPACTION SOIL TYPE Robert Stone &, JOB NO. .. e ....:.; . f... . TEST LJ P, J )" RESULTS Ors CMIPACTION TESTS TEST MOISTURE ELEV. CONTENT Ft) I () lo'-?- Ito, I tC,1 (el a F7111-2- o2z TINLIT DRY DENSITY LBS . /C:U . rT . ) SOIL T YP is NOV 5 197L DATE OF REPO:"'T.......... RFl.JMVE COMPACTION U ) - TABLE .1 RESULTS OF COMP.,%CTIONT TrS-TS TKOJOB ........... DATE OF REPORT. "!dV.5-197/01 . TEST DAM TEST MOISTURE UNIT DRY RELATIVE SOIL NO. ETEV. CONTENT DENSITY MNIPI CTIDN TYPE Ft) (0) (LBS./CU.FT.) 64 6 2 21 Tl e/ 7 P 7, 1011, P-7 c') D r) to TAm.,E .1 RMAMTS OF CO',11PACTIO\ TESTS r a • • rJOBISO. ..... DATE OF riot/ 5 1970 a;r1>U;T ....... TESL DATE TEST < rMO:CSI'U,.I; UI.I' DRYUNIT RELIATIVa SOIT, 1\10, ELEV. Et) CONTENT U} DENSITY La3S./CU.rT.} COh;PACTION TYL L y 0:12 1/06 r 4 J 9, J T --. Z{ o•j `7 4 If I V t i f TABLE' I RESULTS OF COMPACTION 'PESTS J013NO. ......... NOV DATE OF RLPORT ......... . TEST DINE TEST MOISTURC -UNIT DRY RELATIVE SOIL NO. ELEV. CONTENT DENSITY COMPACTION TYPE Ft) () (L1;S./CU.FT.) 06) M.eY.ar4 p aM o1.aOe..'+-eG.eN..eUSrn+w•ms.tv'L'ctatca•.x[.evs=— ww+.—v s.+ea'+r _- ..r.....%r jc'j /-° fO' f + " - J ! Syr f) .. 0 7. clr If z r Ij Gj i 1r 6i 97 ti + 1 I shy Robert Stone & AssOci.— es T7 TIM, I Jl.f 1\lJ e . . • . . . . . . • . a . . TEST DATE 'PEST ELEV. l (Ft) RE'SUL`.l' 3 OF COMPACT.TQ ? TESTS 1110IS.TURi, CONTENT 1) ILI LlitD F r s. r o r 2 70 t_ f2 ter f .-_ t.,. UNIT DRY DENSITY LBS./CU.FT.) DATE. r DATE. OP ).ZEPO?T . NOVt F' ^ a 7. . RELATIVE, COx T)7' CTION o) SOIL TYPE TAP, , a I nESULTS OF CO'MPAC` ION Ta STS I f 1 TEST DATE TEST I MOISTURE UINIT DRY I110. ELEV. I CONTENT DENSI'I'Y Ft) (;) (LBS./CU.Fa-- ) 1 D 17, 9 ) ry i 1 i ifs I{ • `{ - ~ r"`" ! ., 9,1 DATA: OF REPORT. !49, ... RELATIVE COMPACTION 6) . SOIL TYPES I-- Zr, 1!3 p *,, Cj,,,j, 0,, r1i r'T SJ1 J0)3 Jv o ............. TT,ST DATI,? MOISTURE I UNIT DRY NO. T P, S T CONTENT DLNSITY ELEV. (11 ) (LBS./CU..FT.) Ft) 72 cl C2 = 1 c12 C' NOV 5 1970 DATE OF REPORT ........ I . RELATIVE CO'M1-P!l,CTl0'N 110-) SOIL TYP-- 2L 41 J1110. uJOB . . . . . . .. . TEST 1\1 o . RESULT8 0)-' COMPACTION TI'STS MOISTURE TEST NT ELEV. CONTEcl UNIT DRY DENSITY C" " m ) fqov 5 IWO DATE OF REPORT .......... RELATIVE CW5PACTION t 9- 1 SOIL T Y P Z' TABLE I RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS JOB NO............. . DATE OF REPORT .PJOb' ".. 't`.-U.. . TEST DATE MOISTURE TEST UNIT DRY PELATTVE SOIL NO. CONTENT ELEV. DENSITY COMPACTION TYPE Ft) ( J LBS./CU.FT.) tom) e--.-.. .' trt. o c- lls+— `s..r._+_—...awMiR.'a"Tn..,::.uva w+.a...a.. wn Iv rr ii c t f 7Z I VAN cil L« a f + 1. _ C .......r.•.. If T - __ r r Sorl. S /, E, 0 i a " RESULTS Oi C0'-lP.-kC` I(.'jN T'aSTS j O D NO.. ,o, y.:' ...::.... . r7 NOV 5 !S70 DATE OF REPORT.......... F'TEEST I77`E M0 STU UNIT DRY RELATIVE SOIL 1 I No. TEST CONTENT DENSITY COMPACTION TYPE... i ELEV . { ro) LBS . /CU . FT .) o ) Ft) c/, 3may f 6-1 12 c, y n ( 7 f !- - aL `fi+i1 'L Z It41'i fr f"}, }.ry S r.icl .ti TABLI'l I RESULTS 0;' CWIPACTION TESTS JOB NO. NOV 5 1970 DATE OF REPORT.,......... TEST DATE TEST MOISTURE UNIT' DRY RELATIVE SOIL, NO. ELEV. CONTENT DENSITY C'OPAPACTION TYPE Ft) 96) LBS./CU.FT_) 0110 1-7 7) 0 6" eq, 0 CO. TABLE I RESULTS OPCO!1'ACTI011 TESTS JOB iv0... :............ DATE OF REPORT ...... ... . TEST DATE MOISTUPF UNIT DRY RELATIVE SOIL i' NO., TEST ELEV. CONTENT.' DENSI`i'Y - COMPACTION TYPE Ft) LBS./CU.FT.) a c. F... ... •- 1--_.__I.____....._f' I 1.--.,.. x,..,.m,.a..A..-Y. rw. w .-r Y.,..®,o«„,_.-.....,....<._s,n..r.._,-...v. F to T ADLE 1 RESULTS OF COi\IPAC:TION TESTS j OIL NO ... 6.:..:.... .. . DATE OF REPORT . Nov 5.... I . TEST DATA TEST I t0.S2L L U fIT b tlR RELATIVE SOILO NO. LEE T• CONTENT DENSITY \ C:O PA}CTION TYPE 1 l a LB'; IT FT. I JZ IX r -• ice s.re IX r : I e n-... r.. .r._..__r.s 72 c? v' TABLE 1. JOB t"10. TEST NO. RESULTS Or COMPACTION 9'2,STS DATE mols'llurl—p UNIT DRY TEST CONTENT DENSITY ELEV. (LBS,/CU.FT.) KY ri - IvaDATEOFREPORT, ...... RELATIVE COMPACTION 0--) SOIL TYPE 7 v 4 o c: 5,- C) TABLE I RESUL rs OF COMH'--fi'AC ION TESTS dob /Vo, ...L .... ..'1. f I fl lFi•, ei._ . 1 ' 1 'L 4/a/G C/7 pr S T€. 8T NO. DATE TEST TESTPt) PAC 1S"-G1RE CON i ENT Ur\ tIT DRY DENSITY RELATIVE COMPACTION SOIL TYPE i.. E'_S./ CEO. FT) t} I 955, r JD . E 701 1 rr 921. J s. Ia g o 7Ar 6 rr 74, 0 A7, A1 3Q Co A a 1 S TABLE I RESULTS OF COIMPACTION TESTS dos . c.. Nome... , .:::.. . ................... Date of H6port..... rffiv .J ... i 1....... . TEST No., DATE TEST ELEV. MOISTURE UNIT DRY CONTENT DENSITY RELATIVE COMPACTION SOIL TYPE L) M) (L.SS./ CLf. FT.) M) D. Lt /f 1771/ I AZ 74-7 1 4. c top, 9 9 p 8} ROBERT STONE & ASSOCIATES, INC. MILE E RESULTS OF CGP0tP',rAC,'r,10N fub A10.................. ..... A'amo , :..... _ ........ _ ...... _ . /v/0 of F, oport° .... f ! U t'M ........ . E ..rL- EtiO.DATE TEST MOISTURE CONTENT UNITDR DEN`A `fi RELATIVE: COMPACTION I SOIL I TYPE f T— 7,r 17.5 z 717 o r l6e72o, Wmm_ 737 0 05_ loal tom. , Io 1 16?j0 97' TABLE I RESULTS OF COMPACT T10111 TE'TS NGM4? ....... 1/01) its ................. ............... .............. TESL NO.• D A-11, TEST ELEV. Ft) M 0 1 ST U CONTEN- 11 UNIT DRY D ' E N' S IT Y RELATIVE COMPACTION SOIL TYPE tj M) L. B,-, CV. F T.) 10q 9711 987 73p 90 79.0 79- 0 ALL- 07-- o ROHR[ STONE'& ASSOCIATES, INC. TABLE I RESU1_TS OF COMPACT ION TESTS do Alo....... _ . f . -:. Ivamr.................................. D fa of Report.... ,4o a T EST ISO. DATE TEST ELEV. Ft)- MOISTURE CONTENT M) UNIT DRY DMN-ITY LBS.f CU. FT.) RELATIVE COMPACT'IONI M) SOIL TYPE e; 9 d v/ •O 07 ez.g ar r9,, I 7 J J9y15 7a 7 it 1 a. cTrl J 7i qIC700_ M R0BERT ST0tslrE & AS 0CIA TIESSr INC TABLE I RESUU-S OF COMrPACTIONI TESTS do fig ........ ,>.:.......: _if,-port..../cf .......: ............... ... Date o 4€7V 5 ...17 ..... . TEST NO. DATE T!-,LETrLLv. MOISTURE CONTENT 0/0 1- , ,5 111IE-T DRY .. DENSITY L.ES./ CU. E= F) U Y, RELATIVE COMPACTION SOIL TYPE l 1 y o 6q 9 7a r c170 OG . 97 711G? i89 83 745%1 s7 7a- 3 07." 9 , c7o,o szj 03 0 TABLE f RESULTS OF COMPACTION TENS Job No . .......... ....... l.:. -'. Alamo ......... .............. ©a!e of Report..... NOV. 5........... TEST 140. DATE TEST ELEV Et) MOISTURE CONTENT I UNIT DRY DENSITY RELATIVE CGI`WACTION S01L- TYPE LBS./ CLI. FT.) oF o l•q / o r 5 0 90 g 7 r 0 zoo'? I I 71 6?0 6 oG 770 I I 90A3 as)A ° 9 J 174 t j qo.o M l 9 O (?o C, 070) RORERIT STONIE & ASS)OCIATES, INC. TA B L E I RESULTS OF CONIRL".CTION TES'TS Job /vo- . . llfarrr ...... 1Report—, ET. .. ...... NIL D AT F TEST ELEV MOISTIME CRTENT iUNITDRY D E N S IT 'V REL-A,rivLz 1014COMPAC; SolL T Y E L B S. C U, F-F.) I cx') 9- q7, JJLJ_ 01 T 17-p a 90 Y4- 7 ISE: 7 61 IZZPA 67 F7, -7 u,M) ROP)ERT STONEE INC- TABLE f RESULTS OF UOi PAC T iON TESTS lob /Vo.....:... , !'...' Names- ........ _ ....................... ftca of .t )v "....':'}.... . TEST TEST NO. DA E EL_. 7'_ MO.ISTUr.0 CONTENT UNIT DRY DENSITY' RELATIVE COMPACTION SOfI- TYPE(Ft) ELBS./ C:U. FT-) 9p, E.ro r ell J 0 7 ? 1 11, 7 7// 7b o cJ 07 i i 0 d 3. 1711-61 Inc: i G.. carCo} ROBER T STONE ONE8E ASSor-€AT ES, ltlllc TABLE I RP-33ULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS dab Na... r!, N (IV 1070A' /0,16 ...... ....................... Date ol topor" II TEST NO. DATE TEST ELEV. F Q MOISTURE CONTENT UNIT DRY DENSITY RELATIVE COMPACTION PE 011) 2- s 7 /R67 57i- U, oc(, lotl FT o f T% 0/ I t 0. 016 47 1207 7, rI zo- Zzdl 18 FS, 1077 07Z/ o o ROBIERT ISTOINE & ASS OCIA l"E'S INC. TABLE I REESUD',S) OF CONITACTION TESTS dob Mo.— i. . .- ... L ...... ...... IVC1720 ........ Date of Repod ........... J , ` f Ni 0. DATE TEST., ELEV. MOISTUREOICONTE'NTI UNIT DRY DENSITY RELATIVE COMPPOTV"'! SOIL TYPE J!Z 0/0 12 0/0 10; P 0 7F I 7AA; 7,7 7 0 OIL 7/0. C) 611030 TIE 0-10 A53 0 0 lk5 011 AL, DBERT "SJONE 8: AISSOCDATES HNC TABLE E REESULTS OF CONIPACTION' TESTS Job No..... ...........:......... Name ......:. "....... I .............. Date of Roporl..... E' rF-ST DATA TEST ELEV. MOISTURE CONTENT UNIT DRY OENSITF RELATIVE COMPACTION SOIL TYPE Ft) M) LBS./ W. ET.) M) 90 g 76" 7 i I yL rl 069 Ho 9n C i 101,3 7y 97C l 031 0 g 8 130.E 03S- 0 v.o 7A. r? ROBER STO[-E & ASSOCIATES, 111\114,C. TADLE I R ES'Ut -TS3 OF C 0 V1 &'Pil, C T1 0 N I - E__ S T S 1/11;!) A/a ................. I....... ....... Vof T_ C I-- T N, () . D A F H TEST E L EVI STU R, Et-001, T ENi -rC , 01".] UNIT DRY DENSITY R E L AT VE1 CONIPAC-i JON SDI L TTOE 47q, -OR 103 oil 176,0 Ne, 70,0 17. C3, 143, ws-1 i p G' AO 7 A-, I= i -AA-f", 11INCrOPERTSTONE8,, ASSOCR C,007 1 - 1 TADLE I R E'S U LTS 0 F COMPACTION T ESTS dob Ala ...... DC16 Of T Els, r NO, DATE TEST BLEV. M 0 1 S T U R E CONTENT UNIT DRY DENSITY RELATIVE COMPACTION SOIL TYPE M) L[33./ CU. FT.) 7 as" 9 7 oa S'. r' fGC c7/ 17 lei, 55 77 oz. o 16141 j— 3' Ire IWO,? i3) ROP ERT STONE & ASSO ll TABLE I RESULTS OF COMA-F- AC TION TE s1E ofutob ''Vv.... .. ...... 'xrn ....... ..... . ....... . ..... DaleDaleFi'C,if .. _ .. E[;V ....Sa;1...... . TEST i4::t DATE.LE f TEST Ert3 MOIS T ta€ _ CURfTCta €' UINNT DR DENSITY RELATIVE CaE:,E'AG E EC t SOIL i 1 E'E 40/¢i E .!,S.I cif. F'r: 3, 5C7- rr" D 74 19' XK 917, q 9 2 I 3 I 3r 7S o4- 135- 7 0.29 q/,a 5 LV TABLE E RESULT'S, OF C(Yv4iPACT E0s , "Y,t:STS E/ off No ......:.......:.:........ . No1,17o....... ;........................ ]ate,of P'oporl.... NLOV ....19il ......... J- TEST v10. DATE TEST TEST MOISTURE CONTENT ItF-, IT DRY. DENSITY RELATIVE COMPACTION SOIL TYPE LB&/ cu. Ir i.) M) 6 to IVO f r`r l p No r 00, C. 77/ rt la 1-3 9• 111 9, o i a te- - - 3 1 9t'0 to 39 d" o 9.5,15' TABLE I RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS jot NO.. ...:.................... Mc m.................................. 11 fi arf....TlCJVr;........ _ ......... - .. . TES NO, BATS TEST ELEV. IIIiQISTlJRE, CONTENT UNIT DRY DENSITY I3EL_fITII E COMPACTION SOIL TYPE I Ft) i LBS./CU. tr 1378' d 98 i ,z 79 lz_ 9113 991 i 19f m•3 1 r 99/ 7 g ya z 17, 6 liver, f 3 -z. j 99,3 l /3" D9f, 1044, 94.3 J J/ j •,..may f/ 9 9, 7 3 v 3 9. /19 eln r 9 z5- Z/ ROBER T STONE & AS-SOCIA-rES, INC. TABLE I LTS OF CC-iAPACTION 1"Ll 3 Ala- ........... lllmw ........ ....... ....... Date of, flopvvt ...... I ............. I DATE TEST ELEV. Ft) livi 0 IS T U R L UNIT DRY P r,--- N S IT Y LBS./ CU. FT.) RELATI1!E C 0 Ni I A C , H 0 N ey SOIL TYPE 3 A Log 3 7 5-A 4/1 X7, 9 0, 4- 7' ao it-11"'C-1,1jEsc 'll" STOt-11F P,, ASSOCIATES, INC- VABLE I RESULTS OF CONIPACTiON TESTS lob NO.... .. IF7_301/ ....... Nalno ....... Dale of f aporj .... .'NMV 1970 TEST N 0. DA-Fil ELEV. rAt 0 1 ST U E C 0,14 T E IN"' f UNIT DRY CID ' !SITY RELATIVE COMWACTION SOIL TYPE L B S. / 0 U. FT.) M) 7, 17 P5 -0 134 17. S' q'?7 95". 1 Izz 10 7, 71 q 7Z1,0-7,9 40 70 16, 9 5- M ILI Olz 7- f 92 Z.5 3 q f/v 3 VIZ 7kWri) ROBE RT STONE & A3S(.--.,'(--IATE-S, IW TABLE I RESULTS OF COMPS C."P`T IO€ Tb-S TS dob Alo ..... .. ..30.....: lllr rrt ........ .................. Dole Of r'oporl..... ,r r"'. '.... i TFE T Via. DATE TEST ELEV. MOISTUR CON'rEN-i VNIT DRY DENSITY RELATRIE COMPACTION SOIL TYPE 12 / 3 _ IJ39' 7 5 w_ »erg 42'. ILL 102,3 9y I y3 q8 e, P 3• 90.0 iz__ 3 to a Z Wfig, 05(4/` l/.2s 13: 7 9/. il 7 Y3G lay ` 3" 101. 3 g.', G I V,/ 1046 3, 2s aI/ 'q 92 , '7 Rrj 164 Jru} R0';E T STONE & ASSOCIATES, !NC. TAKE I RESULTS OF CO."V1,PACTION Tlr'-M of........... ................... Dotr I DATE TEST ELEV. N1 0 1 aTi7rC CONTENT UNIT DIRY DENSITY RELATIV': i COMPACIlfXq S01 L TYPE e 9 IL944 9- 7,o boa 6 1048 7 oZ z 977 Ioq&, n- 11, 7T., F. 7 ROBERT STONE & ASSOCIATLES, INC TABL'r- I REs3ULT,3) OF GO[A ION TESTS Alamo ....: ...:.. • . Date of .f7- o-po -f......I!Mvl, ...'!f( ...... . TEST No. Dlk1 TEST- Ft) Ivi01"1t0 r CONTENT UNIT DR` DENtSITy cotAPA(-1-101a S 0 1 LELEV TYPE M) LRS./CU, F T.) 12 r 14V Z iq7 ZrT. Q ? Ile leg Z 2F xv Zr f A•_ Lam' .. 9S` 9-_---_ 2< TAD -LE I RESUILTS OF COMPACIMON TEST" r v`t °t) i%..... . . . ......... ; ... .... _ ! i a ` .. _ .... ...................... Z?a . e ! of ep a'.I ...... 1... ... =rJ7 ....... . 1FJ1TEST r-...`.l,.._(...[ v.- t_'_y`,....p5.--n-kIp ] [ DATE* ELFV, 2't.` f— y- ¢ yMOOS i F_ff\6... MOISTURE h Yf-rGad!i[-N Ll;[I! F i t P j s (-yDENFii E4_. L./°.4 .i• f lam+ OT%1,-IAC•I.N SOIL TYPEI6YPE II r 9-5 L070k- T:E, I 12 93, e TAKE 4 RESULTS OF' COMPACTi'ON TESTS Job , f .... .$ %.......... Name .......: - '................... Dale of Repo, t.... , . i"IMI , 11 f n ... . T=S NO. f- C)A-iE TFSrA ELEV. Ft) j 1Ai0lST E;e I CONTENT U1,11T DRY ELN—' II-Y 1 0 BS.v ! . r' RFi_ATIVF C OMPACTIC*J SOIL TYPE 080 l o. o I04r 4Z, 3 ASS f Z.'% Sa ho1. ©- Pg----T 50 1 jQ44 Y 94 s3Mt.3 40-F, T 9 74' - 1 ! _ b 2 9 P to 971311, 9a'... j 1 1 13, 7 1151"13 9 RO ER i S TOt,!E & ASSOCIATES, $i'F . TABLE; I V(, RESULTS OF CONIPACT JOIN! TESTS N...............• fof a p rf.....aobAlo....,.....f„c.......... :tF. .7 ....... TES- fDATE T EST TLEV . Ft MOISTURE C& UNTENT UNIT MY ENSIT RELATIVE C1lf. iG ION SOIL yi PC 4 TABLE I RESULTS OF COMPACT'll(l),N11 -ITSTS Dale of AP -port...... .......... F-S' T T Na. DATE TEST PAOISTURE CONTENT UNIT DRY D E NS I If Y C041PA'i UN 0 1 L TYPE cu. F11-.%, Ll 3 a-zw 4r36 13, wl, d 10J7 f 6;Z0 q64 Z,Z JE ROBERT STO',lic- 8'( ASSOCIATF--S, IN(-". TABLE U0 4), ma. . !V6'; <<, ..........'................... . . .. . Dale of :' eport.....t. .............. TEST I_ IT NO DATL 1,EV . M010TURF. Gc,wrE[\ iT LIMIT DRY DENSITY RELATIVE COMPACTION SOIL TYPE go a " P 4 9/r i 9Z/1 (Z Ty - Ye 43, 7,.< 02 lah. 12s fir, j07 Q ) ROMERT STOINEl & ASSOCIATE" INC. TABLE ! ULTS O COMPACTION TESTS Date ct f'arf......Job /Vc-...................... . ...' .>......;r........ TEST ray. DATE TEST ELEV. MOOS T URc CONTENT UNIT DRY i V DENSITYR£ L TIVE Cf v rACTIONSoil_ 5 72 fT GQ t' Z 02.2- ell f 9447 lev2, 3 Zr G e, 1 99. 7 g% lJ. JM RCABI- Rl iONE t AISSO'CIATIES 34 41 1 i TABLE F RESULTS 01" COMPACTION TES -IFS 3 71 lfQ..-...'`..:...,:.f!....,.......................... . (3i f' 'TrFi crP7/In.......r; ...... TifSf7i Fv€. DATE BI LEV . CONTENT I DENSITY CO',/)F AC`F"IO' E y p E Ft) (OW (LBS./C.U. FT.) ate 1 37, ZZ*,/ j a A/ 0 10. 2 11 TABLE I REESULd S OF COMPACT10',l TEST Va"no ....... :..................... C?n; es !'oport..... r T ...... _ . . T 3T NO. DA-i E I TEST Ll EV , l0ISTR F" UNIT DRY CONTENT t 1 DENSITY REi _ I;TkN E COMPACTION IONS01 L TYPE f ` I f ry` ifr.-_.-+a... w..m rr..w..r - — - — _ _-.:-..mrxew w I az-. ,. w._+ . wr... er bum..-. 1 77 x. ..' \ r- um_... LA j— A le 9vl • 7 Aovo 91, 0 o 94 1 lor, q3- I! q ri 5f 45 q2.7 R( RER T STOImo11'--- 8, ASSOCIATES, I 1`°'I''. OGU7(i) ZJl c.[J.L'PS OP COMP7\C .' IONS PESTS JOB zoo. ............. . DATE OF RE TEST DATE TEST NOISTUlRlT1 UNIT DRY RELATIVE SUT'-1 NO. ELLIC r. CONTENT DI ivS7:` Y COMAPAC` ION TY1'__ Wt) .(") (LBS./CU.r"T.) (a) I - - -. .• - - - - -ter.,,-..... TABLE J PxESULTS, 01' COMPACT.-(O-N TTST.", JOB No.. .............. TEST j DATE TEST mOl-s,.pU:PE NO • ELEV. CONTENT if UNIT DRY DENSITY LB S. /CU. FT.) DATE 01F :PrP0RT.T!0V,% 547,1 RELATIVE COMPACTION 00 I o SOIL TYPE W, 0007b) - Rolberi 1-3 tone ,, 'A' 5)soci L-4 tes TABLE :l RES1J7,Tf' OF —COMPACTION Tf;,S S JOD NO. . :' ` .. . ..... . DATE OFREPOR`' f tV ,, . 1(i. . TEST DATE, TEST MOISTURE UNIT DRY RELATIVE SOIL NoCONTE ra ELEV. DFI SITY COIMPACT ION TYPE 4 fs v ` Jam•-'• - e I•' r _.———...--- fil ! I ... % .- r -c+ s.-.+r'n..aw..armam.,.„.....+ywr w w.w _..... _ _ ._ ._ r._s_._..r..r -.v.- TA P, L I 1. IZESULTS Oj,' C-0`11.FIACTION JOD NO..... ... ...'..`. vD2\T9 OF REPORT ....No..19 l.f, TESTI DATE TEST MOISTURE ' UJ-.,,llT DRY RELATIVE Sofa,, ELEV. CONTENT DENSITY COMPACTION TYPE F-L) LBS. /CU. FT. 1-1 77- F- 77y J- Tv RESULTS O1' `PESTS JOB NO............ G... DATE OF REPORT .."GV 5... . T'i]ST AE DATETEST MOISTUl,B NIn DRY r L TIVE RELATIVE i I SOILNo. ELEV. CONTENT T DENSITY COtMPACTION l` YP', I m. .s.......y....... C' I i rr S% 1 F f 1 ' 1 f la.-....+J++ I •... r.......'_... 1 } 5 J.- a. l.»....I _-. Ll. 4 iSC.G WEC1 4- 5 iM1.t.i.!:f y (a70 a`lls) TADLE 11 RE IULTOS OF COMPAIM 10*11 TESTS 0 ---port, O' ivo.. " -- 6", Vam . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dc !, I 1r DATE TEST klf 0 1 S t t. J R TFE- ur"ll b DRY R F L-.A.-f I'V F SOIL NO, ELEV. 0 0 N N T D F- W,", IT Y C f 0 P,,",. C - i0N TYPF ci 0-B, r". c U. F 1'. C t- e- R0,MF---.RT S-11-0, AS50CIATES, Z ABLL I 10-ti C/.. •' fJ... r. ....f.. I.4.. la c........•J L.!/L 4'i %:[7. 1': Y1 .... k.14 ............... T m M01STUt,U. I UNIT DRY RELATIVE SOIL N0. E LFL CC)NTI N-I LE" DENSITY C:C)FAP1,CTION I- i,PE SIC) rf LPS./ CU. FT.) I I -ABLE I RESULTS OF COPOPAC-1'101-! TESTS Ala / 77 Ni 0, vDoloofRoport-4 ................. T E .Sl T D AT le( r, TEST RLEV. M 0 1 S T LJ RJ7 UNIT DRY RFLATIVE SoSOIL. N 0. t) E[JCONTF DENISITY COIF TYPE 13/.) LEIS./ CO, FT.) M j Jr ; K I I f 1 ram, 3 tit i ' ' , 4 x, l i TAL`'[J`, J. i, JOB PTO...::..:... o . TEST I)A'.!'E TEST MOISTURE UNIT DRY NO, ELEV. CONTENT DENSITY Ft) (=d) {LBS./CU.FT. ) r .a l.<.t•_s:s- w.x.m..+..rcaa: -f.,...-,•-..,.......,.e..-..,,..,.,.,.,..-.-...y.,....e--t,-a.ar..r.. 67 7 T. F r I .... 9.... ,...-.. tee... , 1. •t ~ ,.,t f ,... ' DINE OF R OR'T7. .,s rZB)., NT]:VL COMPACTTON SOIL TYPE I I' 4 s. o' c a It 6! `r" P+ c TABLE I RESULfS OF COMPAC HON Tic"o-i"S 7lobAa—1. .......... ............... Dale of Rc 0 TEST bAT E. TEST MOISTURE UNIT DP, RELATIVE IS C! L NO. CONTENT DEIIJ111'ry PP.C"i- ON T'll"E r, t) L BS. U, F T) s I r 1 A i, a_. k:. I Joi; Nc tno ....... _ ....! , ................. Dole of ......r`0v Tf_S! E7 3"(± RHO. TF S'?' ! MOIS' Uf—"f-_: j CO NTEN UNIT € R RELATIVE S0 i7:=1yJ`sITY I ..(....... odoy ,.ro o 06 ................ . , ........... gUlb` } .. ` ryr> t c 2 7'cl "'I I iris l', % .-q) I no i ) f "/,,) (qINl I NOO 1 6 21r El I Al IS111D1 -- 0 IN! is 71 i OA1 qOP ............... ............... ..... C z / 6/ Cj-. ? r-11 0 0 -1 M) 1 I FLT, 3.LVOailJ- V D Ll UNIP1 zl! 1 0 V,,, E.1 LAj\QN jock ....... ............ UVIV ....... 1IleOI-# r0jljo,, 17 , SIS211 N1011. 1--k") v d tAl! I -1- lIN41 e 14Dlll"Vd