Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout30578 (334)3 - DIST *10 Soil Enginedrin Re ort on CompactionL Testing, _Txao A 113:05:7 Lots 1 through 188 and TracT--j 280,. Lots 6 through 8, Diamond Bar, County of Los Angeles, California 7 Robert Stone & Associates Robert Stone & Associates, inc. Engineering Geology - Soil Mechanics - Foundation Studies . I Ai't 19720 Ventura Boulevard — Woodland Hills, California 91364 213) 346-0565 — (213) 873-7382 November 5, 1970 1-68-301-10 E' L. Pearson and Associates 1551 West Redondo Beach Boulevard Gardena, California 90247 Subject: Soil Engineering Report On Compaction Testing,, Tract 30578, Lots 1 through 188 and Tract 30289, Lots 6 through 8, Diamond Bar, County of Los AngelesCalifornia. Gentlemen: This report Presents our opinions pertaining to the compacted fill placed on the subject property. Laboratory Standard A7TM:D-1557-64T. pi(j d.j f e(I 4 inch diarneter'mold, 1/30 cu ft 3 layers, 25 blows per layer; 10 lb hammer, dropped 18 inches. Soil Type Maximum Dry optimum Density Moisture psf) ( %, ) Tan Coarse SAND 130.1 12.4 II Tan Medium/Coarse SAND 117.0 13.0 Tan Fine/Medium SAND 113.0 13.4 IV Light Brown Fine Silty SAND 113.0 14.2 V Light Brown Sand SILT 108.5 16.7 VI Gray and Light Brown SHALE 104.0 19.6 VII Brown SILT 100.6 19.8VIIIWhite/Light Brown Caliche and Silty SAND 110.0 16.3 Ix Red -Brown Clayey SAND 119.0 12.0 X Red --Brown Clayey Silty SAND 11.7.5 12.1 XI Red -Brown Clayey Sandy SILT 113.2 17.5 E. L. Pearson and Associates November 5, 1970 1-68-301-10 Page 2 XII Dark -Brown Silty CLAY 97.0 20.0 XIII Red -Brown Sandy SILT with Clay 115.2 13.0 XIV Fine Silty SAND and Shale 105.0 17.5 XV Fine Sandy CLAY with Shale 107.0 16.0 XVI Red -Brown and Gray Silty CLAY 99.4 19.5 XVII Tan -'Brown Silty CLAY with Shale 97.3 17.4 XVIII. Tan -Brown Sandy CLAY with Shale 103.0 20.3 XIX Tan Sandy CLAY 101.0 17.0 XX Tan -Brown Sandy CLAY 103.5 19.0 XXI Tan Clayey SILT with Diatomaceous Shale 88.0 27.0 PREPARATION OF' NATURAL GROUND Prior to the placement of compacted fill, vegetation, brush, trees, debris, and other deleterious materials were removed. The canyon bottoms were cleaned of loose soils and/or alluvium as determined in the field during excavation by the supervising soils engineer. The depths of removal to firm natural ground varied from three to ten feet. Subdrains consisting of six inch diameter, perforated corrugated aluminum pipe embedded in gravel were placed as shown on the attached grading plans. METHOD OF FILL PLACEMENT Fill soils were placed in lifts of six to eight inches in thick- ness, watered as necessary to approximate optimum moisture con- tent, aria compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent of the laboratory standard. Robert Stone & Associates E. L. Pearson and Associates 1-68-301-10 November 5, 1970 Page 3 Fill slopes were compacted by back rolling, at intervals of four feet in vertical height, with a sheepsfoot'roller. When. the slope reached design height, the entire face was rolled with overlapping passes of a sheepsfoot roller. Slope surfaces were finished under supervision by one of the following methods: grid rolling, track rolling or trimming to firm compacted soils. EQUIPMENT Equipment used in placing the fill consisted of bulldozers, scrapers, sheepsfoot rollers and water trucks. COMPACTION TESTING AND DEPTH OF FILL Compaction test locations are shown on the attached As -Built 0 Grading Plans prepared by E. L. Pearson and Associates. Compac- tion tests were made in eacli two feet of fill and the test results are shown in Table I. Compaction tests were made accord- ing to ASTM:D-1556-58T. The areas occupied by compacted fill are shown on the attached grading plans. The maximum depth of compacted fill covered by this report is about 75 feet. COMPACTED FILL BUTTRESSES AND SHEAR KEYS Compacted fill buttresses were emplaced on the following Lots: 11, 12, 15-18, 44, 70-74 and 76-80. Shear keys were emplaced on the following Lots: 47-55, 58-69 and 170-176. RESTRICTED USE AREAS Restricted use areas occur on the following Lots: 15-17, 35-43, 46-55, 58-69 and 168-181. FIPAL 6'ci- Robert Stone & Associates 1-68-301-10 E. L. Pearson and Associates— page 4 November 5, 1970 EXPANSION TESTS Expansiantests were performed on typical samples Of material obtained froin the finished lots. These tests measurae the verti- o relative expansion of soil specimens remolded tcallinearexpanlaboratorystandard. The spec.1- compaction of go percent of the ture content. The specimens mens are remolded at optimum mois hours. They are then placed inareallowedtoair-dry for 24 the testing devices and water is added to simulate a ssaturated condition. The specimens are placed under a surcharg 60 lb/sq ft and in accordance With the County of Los Angeles standards. The percent swell is then measured when expansion ceases, normally in 24 hours. The results of the expansion tests are as follows: Sample No. A -Sandy Clay B -Sandstone C-Siltstone D -Sandy Clay E -Clayey Sand F -Sandy Clay Percent Swell Undgr 60 psf Load) 9.50 2.50 4.90 10.00 1.60 4.85 various soil types is given in A lot by lot breadkown of the Table II. Robert Stolle & Associates E. L. Pearson and Associates November 5, 1970 1-68-301-10 Page 5 SOIL BEARING PRESSURES Recommended bearing pressures for desing of continuous foundations and shallow pier foundations placed at the recommended depths are as follows: Firm Natural Soil 1000 lbs/sq ft Compacted Fill 1500 lbs/sq ft Bedrock 2000 lbs/sq ft Recommended bearing pressures for design of caissons is 3000 lbs/sq ft at the recommended depth. These values may be increased by 1/3 in designing seismic forces and wind loads. RECMRAENDRD LATFRAT, PRI,,,SSUP\FS Recommended active pressures to be considered in the design of retaining walls axe as follows: Surface Slope of Equivalent Retained Material* Fluid Weight Horz. to Vert. lb/cu ft LEVEL 30 2 to 1 43• 1z to 1 55 1 to 1 80 Recommended passive pressures to be considered in design are as follows: Robert Stone & Associates E. L. Pearson and Associates November 5"r 1970 Soil Type 1-68-301-10 Page 6 Equivalent Fluid Weight lb/cu ft Firm Natural Soil 250 Compacted Fill 350 Bedrock 400 A coefficient of friction between the soil. and concrete founda- tions of 0.4 may be assumed. GENERAL FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS A lot by lot analysis of the tract has been made with reference to foundation design. The analysis included a breakdown into various categories by interrelating the type of earth materials and their expansion qualities, and the angle of slopes on the lots. The analysis was applied to what appears to be the most roba? Ic building area on each lot. The restilts, of the ara,11 are presented in Table II. Where more than one type'of foundation category is shown in Table II, the building official can determine the applicable design criteria based on the location of the structures. Robert Stone & Associates El E. L. Pearson and Associates November .5, 1.970 I Foundations inCan,p.acte_d Fill Padsor Pads Excatvaed in Bedrock 1-68-301-10 Page 7 On the 104-s having soils that are over three percent expansive, sur. fac:2- drainage and drainage of planters Should be provi(l-d. sc that no water is allowed to enter the subsoils in or adjacent to tb.c- building area. Psus horf Slnnr- SLAB CONSTPUCTIMN EXPANSIVENESS._ Swell) I P2 1 0 F _FFOOTING SLAB REINFORCEMENT T AL REINFORCEMENT THICKNESS OF ROCK BASE OR CLEAN 60 psf LOAD BELOW 4" NORMA -T, SAND UNDER LIVING AIR-DRY TO FINISH 1 THICKNESS AREA AND MOISTURE SATURATION GI0, _AIDE - r BARRIER 0% to 3% 12" 6''x6't-10/10 Optional 6 -mil Visqueen Wire Mesh 1" Sand over Visqueen 3% to 8% 181f 6"x6"-10/10 1 -A4 @ top 4" + 6 -mil Visqueen Wire Mesh and Bottom 1" Sand over Visqueen 2, G "::6 6 Wire Mesh 2 4 t 0 j and Bottom 1" Sand over rn C ON S CT T Cr,j EXPANSIVENESS DEPT1-1 Of Swell) FOOTIDJG RE'INFORCEMIENT INTERIOR 60 'Psf LOAD BELOW BEARING AIR-DRY TO FINISHF WALLS SATURATION 0% to GRADE 1211 Optional Piers As per Code Allowed 3% to 8% 18% 1 - #4 @ top 1 - if 4 @ to"-) Not Permitted a n d bottom and bottom Under Bearing Walls 8 96, to 12% 2411 2 - li4 or 2 - 44 @ top Not Permitted 1 - #6 @ top and bottom and bottom i Under Bearing Walls On the 104-s having soils that are over three percent expansive, sur. fac:2- drainage and drainage of planters Should be provi(l-d. sc that no water is allowed to enter the subsoils in or adjacent to tb.c- building area. Psus horf Slnnr- E. L. Pearson and Associates 1-68-301-10 November 5, 1970 Page 8 II Foundations in Natural Soils A. SIOPO of Byilldinq Ar a - 3:1 or Platter 1. Foundations should he designed according to the table given fove under Section I. 2. Foundation excavations should be inspected by a soils engineer to determine the suitability of the soils to provide the recommenaM bearing capacity and to verify the expansive soil condi- tions. B. Slope of Building Areafjg22er than 3:1 to 2:1 1. Exterior and Interior Fcundations: Continuous into badrock, 12 inchco ninimum fcr one-story buildings and 18 inches minimum for two-story builVings, Reinforced according to the following tablF"- Wall Reirforcement. 0% to 8% 1 - 04 @ top and bottom 8% to 12% 2 - 14 @ top and bottom 2. Pier Foundations: 16 inches minimum into bedrock 3. Beating Surface: The depths of penetration given above should be obtained in firm bedrock that is unaffected by creep. Grein q R. L. Pearson anJ Associates 1-68-301-10 November 5, 1970 Page 9 4. inspections: The foundation excavations should be inspected by a soils engineer and an engineering geologist to determine the suitability of the bed- rock and to verify the expansive soil conditions C. Slopc of Building Area - Steeper than 2:1 to IQ 1. Exterior anj Interioz Foundations: Continuous foundations into bedrock a minimum of 24 inches and the outer edge of the footing should be a minimum horizontal distance of five feet from the slope face. The footings should be reinforced with a minimum of two No. ,4 reinforcing bars placed at the top and bottom of the footings. 2. Caison Founfations: Threa feet minimum into bedrock. Tied together by grade beams. 3. Bearing Surface: The depths of penetration given above should be obtained in firm bedrock that is unaffected by creep. 4. Creep Forces: These foundations should be designed to resist a nominal creep force of 1000 pounds per foot of soil and creep affected materials penetrated. 5. Inspections: The foundation excavations should be inspected by a soils enginnar and an engineering geologist to determine the suitability of the bed -- rock and to verify the expansive soil conditions. R(Ab'rt StonF & Associates E. L. Pearson and Associates 1-68-301-10 November 5, 1970 Page 10 Ill S210 I Desi qn Conditions The foundation plans should he reviewed by a soils engimer and an engineering geologist for the following conditions: A. Foundations on Cut, Fill and Natural Soils Any combination of two or more', B. Foundations Encroaching an Stabiiization Installations C. Foundations on Slopes Steeper than 10:1. Robc,rt Stone & As!:;ociates E. L. Pearson and Associates November 5, 1970 1-68-301-10 Page 11 RECOMMENDATIONS CONCERNING ADDITIONAL GRAMM 1. On lots where cuts are proposed in excess of three feet in vertical height or where cuts are proposed (any height) that would undercut a dip slope or bedding plane inclination as shown on the geologic map, a grading plan review by an engineering geologist is recommended. 2. If additional grading is proposed on any lot where stabiliza- tion installation exists a grading plan review by a soils engineer and engineering geologist is recommonded. 3. Wherever proposed grading (primarily filling) would increase driving forces above an existing stabilization device (even if on another lot) a grading plan review by a soils engineer and engineering gcclogist is recommvn3ei. 4. When a grading permit is required, reconmiendations concerning additional proposed grading such as fill placement, cleanouts, cut orientation and slope construction should be made when the proposed grading is known. 5. In all other cases Los Angeles County requirements concerning issuance of grading permits should apply. Very truly yours, ROBERT STONE & ASSOCIATES, INC. CG: caa B, Enclosures: Gerald Gorian, RCE; 14698 Grading Plar. Grading Certificates Table 1, and Table M Distribution: 4 Client 2 County of L. A. Dept. of Bldg. & Safety and Geology Scction) Robert Stone & Asso(jates 11 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DTFPAR`111[`NT OF COUNTY ENGINEER BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION S,UPERVTSED GRADING INSPECTION CERTIFICATE To be filed Ti_id j_jTj_jcjte,-at the local Building and Safety Office) Job Address or Taact No, 0289 Locality Diamond Bar Mer Transamerica Develov)ment Permit No. 1:2 ROUGH FXI BY SOILS ENGINEER A) I certify that the earth fills placed on the following lots were installed upon competent and properly prepared base material and compacted in compliance with requirements of Building CodeSection7010. 1 further certify that where the report or reports of an engineering geologist, relative to this site, have recommended the installation of buttress fills or other similar stabilization measures., such earthwork construction has been completed in accordance with the approved design. LOT NOS. -6 through 8 See report dated 1115/70 for compaction test data, recommended allowable soil bearing values and other special recommendations. EXTANSIVE SOILS (YES)- (NO) LOT NOS. ALL BUTTRESS FILLS (YES) (140) LOT NOS. ...AT,T, Remarks Reg. No. Date 1 /5 /7 Lgineer a t u r e Gerald GorianElBYSUPERVISINGGRADINGENGINEER B) I certify to the satisfactory completion of rough grading including: grading to approximatefinalelevations; property lines -located and staked; cut and fill slopes correctly graded andlocatedinaccordancewiththeapproveddesign; swales and terraces graded ready for paving; berms installed; and required drainage slopes provided on the building pads. I further certi- fy that where report or reports of an engineering geologist and/or soils engineer have been prepared relative to this site, the recommendations contained in such reports have beenfollowedintheprosecutionofthework. LOT NOS. Remarks Engineer -( Signature Reg. No. Da to 1:1 FINAL GRADING CERTIFICATION C) I certify to the satisfactory completion of grading in accordance with the approved plans. All required drainage devices have been installed; slope planting established and irrigationSystemsprovided (where required); and adequate provisi have beer-, made for drainage ofC surface waters from each building rite:. The -econmmendat,Jon: of the soils engineer and/or engineering geologist (if Such persons were employed) have been incorporated in the work. LOT NOS. Remarks Engineer Reg. No. "Date 7- AW-MlIT USE ONLY: Trac t No. port approved by Title Permit No. Date Da to I(U,l Lh.1 1::: P7 NV] ,A. ui! ITP I,:1?VT F) G PA I YI ;1(1 IN ' ',I F(: T1 011 To be filed in doplica(,o ".1f, t'he locji Off'Jc(-,) Locality Diamond - Transamerica Develo Pcripj t No. J 1?0117jLOf A L CCNC ERTIFICATIONNC BY SOILS E NGINEFR I certify that the earth fills plac(d on fl)o f'o1lowJn,(,, lols, ,,iore An.stallo(.1 upon compctcnt and' pro1wrly prepared baso water.Ial and covipacted in c(:)mp1Aan(,v v,,.Ith reqoireims,nts of hulldin,-, Section 7010- 1 further certify th"'It Where t1w report or reports of an goolorJst, relatftvc, to this site, have recommond-d tllr,, 111st"'Illation of, b111,;trcss, Nll,.; or Other ,.:1,milar stabilJzatjon measures, such earthworjk cons true t! on has been completed in accordance vjth the approved design. LOT NOS. 1 through 1.88 See ' report dated 11/5-/70- - for compaction test data, recommended allowable soil bearing values and othcrr speci.a.l recommendaLftons. EYPANSI.V113, SAILS (YES) WO) LO" NOS. See _Egp qr BUTTRESS FILLS (YES) (1!0) LOT NOS. See Report Remarks Engineer Reg. No. T5- -4_( f3 Date Gerald Gorian By SM)ERVIS11,T * G P: NG I I E E REl1GGRADIN B) I certify to the satisfactory cimpletJon of voijgh j, radingIncludi 'ng: grading to approx-Imatefinalelevations; property lines located and st3,,ed; cut and "ill slopes correctlygrauied and located in accordance with the approved dcsign; &nd terraces graded ready forbermsinstalled: and re-,IW.red drainaje slopes provid-sf on the bailding, pads. I ccirti- fy that whcre, report or reporus of' an engjnF-ering ologist and/or soils engineer hzave been prepared relative to this site, the recommendations conta.in(d in such reports have. 11-e?C'n followed in the prosecution of the work. LOT NOS. Remarks Enginer^r - — -- Rog. No. Da to USE Tract No. Date Engineer Reg. 110. Date S:Ignature) nPRTI K CATT ON C) I certify to the satisfactory completion of grading in accordance with the approved plans. All required drainage dcvrces hav(been installedJ(,,pe p'lanting est , abljshc:d and irri,,atlon systems provided (:!here rcqulred); an(,' adequate,provisiiOns have been mad(' ior drainagr-, f surface waters frx.i each buil LlIng sJte. The. rcc,)mmendot.lons of the -,c)jj.,r c,,,,ineer and/or engineering geolog3st (if' sus -,h persons were omployc,,I) have b(.cn incorporatcd"in the 1jor),. LOT IMS. Remarks Enginer^r - — -- Rog. No. Da to USE Tract No. Date JOBNO.,. ............ TEST DATE TEST NO. ELEV. Ft) DATE OF REPORT ..NOV 5.......1970.. S MOISTURE UNIT DAY CONTENT DENSITY - M (LBS./CU.FT.) RELATIVE COMPACTION SOIL TYPE Stone &, Associallc'-'s 950 7 9(0 957 4-, 9 G 7 G & j 70 JLL Stone &, Associallc'-'s TABLE RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS NO............. lq70IDATEOrREPORT .t'T" .. DATE TEST MOISTURE UNIT DRY RELATIVE SOIL NO. ELEV. CONTENT DENSITY' COMPACTION TYPE Ft) M LBS./CU.FT.) 9G2 f `www A//J('X 97/ 97/ 97, 9 72( Y r 7 l r i 7 w. 974 22 9 74 976- 974- 97(o 9 7 9 7 ro 9 7 2 57G 977 977 TABLE 1 RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS JOB NO..: . » ... DATE OF REPORT ,x'V .5.. TEST DATE TEST MOISTURE UNIT DRY RELATTVE SOIL NO. ELEV. CONTENT. DENSITY COMPACTION TYPE i) i) LBS,/CU,FT.) l i 9 7 15 f r...........n.. s 7 w..:vy..,,.n -'-- .......w.,,. v...w+..,,.....,.....rw...e. u.a.... e.e... ,.....,.,. X//4 97 900 s' c. 2_ r ! 1-7 G i TABLE 1 RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS JOBNO ................ DATE OF REPORT .NO.V.r). TEST NO. DATE TEST- ELEV.' Ft) MOISTURE CONTENT UNIT DRY DENSITY LBS./CU.FT.) RELATIVE, COMPACTION SOIL TYPE 3X. Ik 9 a 2 1 2 r 1 ( Y IIS 19 '05 Z2 17/ L / 70 98- 2 113 ?1 9 T TABLE, I RESULTS OF COMPACTION?TESTS NO...,... ....•: 140V 1970 DATE OF RE -PORT .....5....... TEST DATE TEST ELEV. MOISTURE CONTENT UNIT DRY DENSITY RELATIVE COMPACTION SOIL, TYPE NO. 1 , Ft) M LBS./CU.FT.) FNO 41:11 Vlj c S)64,57 61) 7 7 T',2, 14, 1 0 L? o TABLE 1 RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS 11'1 r?- - - : 3 1! v JOB NO... DATE OF REPORT .140V...5.. 1970 ..... TEST DATE TEST MOISTUPtL' UNIT DRY. RELATIVE SOIL T70,-ELEV. CONTENT DENSITY COMPACTION TYPE Ft) LBS./CU.FT LL(L- 9 go 9 9s) 9 2r. 9C- 9 '2- v/ 54- 77 4. Robert Stone &, Associates T-7 TABLE I RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS JOB......... No..... TEST DATE TEST MOISTURE, UNIT DRY NO. ELEV. CONTENT DENSITY Ft) I% ( LBS./CU.FT.) DATE OF REI?ORT .f40V ....5.. 1970 ..... RELATIVE COMPACTION M SOIL TYPE 1 7 77 co, a 055 I coo 17 oo oo 2. IX c JOB NO.-... DATE OF REPORT. ...`'...1. r 70 . . TEST. DATE TEST I,IOI,STURP UNIT DRY RELATIVE SOIL NO. ELEV. CONT.tNT DENSITY' COIMPACTION TYPE y Ft) () (LBS./CU.FT.) U) l d •- v f r. y C 940 r rl j 411, e m 944 /1,4 004-, R A t 9 co 17 4 a_/! 99(, TABLE } RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS 0111 N0.7 5 . , . DATE OF REPORT. .,.. JOB NO. ............ TEST DATE TEST MOISTURE CONTENT UNIT DRY DENSITY,., RELATIVE COMPACTION SOIL TYPE NO. ELEV, Ft) LBS./CU,FT,) a) 9 5114 rm ,, 1010 v ww. f FT i J ry/ r f. w'C. C, / fes" f .........., i t OV 1070 DATE OF REPORT.............' TEST DATE TEST MOISTURE UNIT DRY RELATIVE SOIL N0. ELEV. CONTENT DENSITY COMPACTION TYPE Ft) LBS./CU.FT.) n 11 1 S r f j 95--1 m.awwnvr.w+.sw.......r.n y5 !% 4..»" f (, / y^/` i Imo..... 956 1014 f TABLE 1 RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS JOB NO, .`+; .' :r~' `" ."`• , . • . DATE OF REPORT . C ' i970 TEST NO. DATE TEST ELEV. MOISTURE CONTENT UNIT DRY DENSITY RELATIVE COMPACTION SOIL TYPE LBS./CU.FT.) 75 4-- r wrwr+w w J r 954C r z 7- Stone <,, AsSOCia tcs TABLE 1 RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS DATE OF REPORT. V TEST DATE TEST NO. 'ELEV. Ft) MOISTURE CONTENT t) UNIT DRY RELATIVE SOIL DENSITY COMPACTION TYPE LBS . /CU .FT,.) 060 N-5 U -IL 9 7L 7 4 4; 9.40 74 4, 2- Robcrt Stone L Assoc! TABLE 1 RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS JOB t OV 5 1970 DATEOF REPORT ............ TEST DATE TEST MOISTUP—t UNIT DRY RELATI-VE SOIL NO. ELEV. CONTENT DENSITY COMPACTION TYPE Ft) M LBS./CU.FT.) 4 2 71 9 ZT. I 9 4 1 S -4 17 0 o 1,2 4z A 611 to, TABLE 1 RESULTS OF C0l',lPACTION TESTS JOB No... NOV r, 1970 i IDATEOFP%FPORT ............ I TEST DATE TEST MOISTURE UNIT DRY RELATIVE SOIL NO, ELEV. CONTENT DENSITY COMPACTION TYPE Ft) LBS./CU.FT.) 1 n 21. Al Z 1021-- v. J - m TABLE 1 RESU',r-,TS OF COMPACTION TESTS JOB No... DATE OF REPORT. TEST DATE TEST MOISTURE NO. ELEV. CONTENT M UNIT DRY DENSITY LBS./CU.FT.) RELATIVE SOIL COMPACTION TYPE 611 70Z. I rl-//; 0 ell 611 70Z. I rl-//; 0 611 70Z. I rl-//; TABLE; 1 RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS JOB NO.. ...........M, DATE OF REPORT.... TEST NO. TEST MOISTURE ELEV. CONTENT Ft) UNIT DRY DENSITY LBS./CU.FT.).' RELATIVE SOIL COMPACTION TYPE o 0 17 1 19 7 7S7 x4, 2", 7 7 S 7-/,7 73 1 so- TABLE 1 RESULTS OF COMPACTION `.VESTS tJ01 JOB NO. ; 4 <..... , .:... DATE OF REPORT,-. ... 197© . TEST DATE TEST MOISTURE UNIT DRY RELATIVE SOIL NO. ELE CONTENT DENSITY COMPACTION TYPE' Ft) LBS./CU.FT.) U) r 96 4 r fF t 1 r. F 1 1177 r rl TABLE , RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS JOB NO. ............. TEST DATE TEST MOISTURE No. ELEV. CONTENT 16) Ft) tjOkl r1971 DATE OF REPORT ........... UNIT DRY RELATIVE DENSITY COMPACTION LBS./CU.FT.) (110) SOIL TYPE Robert Stone &, Associatc s 36 I/ A r. c' 94 9 2 949 7 K 9 4. s Robert Stone &, Associatc s TABLE 1 RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS JOB "NO ....... NOV r 1970 DATE OF REPORT ........... - TEST DATE TEST MOISTURE UNIT DRY RELATIVE SOIL NO, ELEV. CONTENT DENSITY COMPACTION TYPE Ft) LBS./CU.FT.), u 4 V Jfl 95-3 cl 17 ter4 17 7 4- 76 TE 2 TABLE 1 RESULTS Or COMPACTION VESTS CC OB NO...J..:' . • r`, .... DATE Or REPORT ,NOV , iJ1970, TEST DATE TEST MOISTURE UNIT DRY RELATIVE SOI, NO. ELEV. CONTENT DENSITY COMPACTION TYPE. LBS./CU,FT.) 6) µms. f v T -elr O / 92 TABLE:, 1 RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS K - JOBNO ................ NOV 5 - 1970 DATE OF REPORT........... TEST DATE TEST MOISTURE UNIT DRY RELAT*VE SOIL NO. ELEV. CONTENT DENSITY COMPACTION TYPE LBS./CU.FT.) 9-73 7 94 Z. d '".. r u%,! 1 `.; fl" "J r wkµ I 9 gs, I............ c.,•r / d J A , v.s.w. l — nu.. ... W r..r'.r"" TEST DATE TEST MOISTURE UNIT DRY RELATIVE SOIL . NO. ELLVn CONTENT DLIlSI.TY COI:PACTLOT TYPE Ft)- M LBS./CI7.FT.) f14 1 r..' / J %% 91 r F 9 ITT 2. f f 7411 r JOB NO.. . . . . . ......... DATE Or REPORT M,. ° .. 1970 TEST DATE TEST MOISTURE UNIT DRY RELATIV :. SOIL NO. ELEV. CONTENT DENSITY COIMPACTIOA TYPE Ft) LtPS./CU.FT. ) t6) 77 r v` a1 « ry n-..an.... w...eu..+.e.,w v a. p wxv,s'.rm-o.r' wwr.w.v..i....u....n..a.. ...wa. mu...,lwaeuw....e..u..+...ru.....iw .u.w wawuw+m.u.,u .r.,,.vs> ew. eaenrewau.. LL 1 n` 51-, w I ri r J i f ,. / / l!f 7 rte+ C Irl f n lr " f I f,,''' rw' °, M i i „) .,... r f J w"( 1 y / r V F I yf1 f' r tea.......... f' f /; . a , r..w... J .n. r . f : .,: } a....r...... ..... .,.w....rw"'ww.., TA111,11' RESULTS OF COMPACTION I " 6,11 JOB NO .................. DATE OF REPORT.......... VV5 7970 1 TEST DATE TEST MOISTURE UNIT DRY RELATI\7E SOIL NO. EL V. CONTENT DEINSI'lly COMPPCTION T Y P E, Ult) LBS./CU.FT.) 5Q 8 9.1 A"? j c TABLE, I 1. RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS JOBNO ................ f40V 1970 DATE OF REPORT........... TEST DATE TEST MOISTURE UNIT DRY RELATIVE SQiIL N ELEV. CONTENT DENSITY COMPACTION TYPE Ft) rol) LB S /CU. PT. Irw o Taf 7 o 6,0 TABLE 1 1 RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS JOB NO. NOV 5 1370 DATE OF REPORT ........... TEST DATE TEST MOISTURE UNIT DRY RELATIVE SOIL NO. EL CONTENT DENSITY CO,,PACTION TYPE Ft) LBS./CU.PT.) 7 Vpg jl- 70, Z, TABLE y RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS 1 DATE OF REPORT. ..... 370.. JOB NO TEST DATI, TEST'MOISTURE UNIT DRY RELATIVE SOIL NO. ELEV . CONTENT DENSITY CaT 1PACTION TYPEE Ft) ( ) LBS./CU.FT.) o N f 1 i J f f I w r, w r r JOB NO. ..; 7 ............. JOB TEST DATE TEST M Ol S T t I RE, NO.I CONTENT J:, 1, r, V . (%.) kr L) UNIT DRY DENSTTY LLS ./CU.PT. ) DATE OF REPORT.,lov 5 1,97oJ o * o I o RELATIVE COMPACTION SOIL 12YPE forl V TABLI"' I RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS JOB NO. NOV 10 DATE OF REPORT ... 5.....97... TEST DATE TEST mo I S'f u RE U.,,,IT DRY RELATIVE SOIL NO. ELEV . CON=T DENSITY' COMLPACTION TYPE Ft) LBS./CU.FT..) 4 7) Irl 78 7- 78 I/ RESULTS 01' COIMPACTION. TESTS JOBNO ................ t4oV 5 1979 DATE OF REPORT... i ........ TEST DATE TEST MOISTURE UNIT DRY RELATIVE SOIL NO. ELEV. CONTENT DENSITY COMPACT101N, TYPE 7,.7 75 cil 71 Y RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS JOB NO .................. TEST 1\10. DATE TEST ELEV. Ft) MOISTURE CONTENT rull ) UNIT DRY DENSITY LBS./CU.FT.) 1370DATEOFREPORT .NOV 5......... RELATIVE COMPACTION 96) SOIL TYPE 0 w.w.«., e.,.....r,..mwr.r+..r,.r....+.w......., w.,w tet ,... n...rs..a, r ......... a.....,... y. `..,..,.w n.. T A 13b1:, .1. RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS JOBNO. ....... RV..1970 1DATEOFREPORT..... 5 ...., S TTESTTEST DATE TEST MOISTURE, UNIT DRY RELATIW:' SOIL N0 NO. ELEV. CONTENT DENSITY COMIPACTION TYPE Ft) P) LBS, /CU. FT. 010 ll)7!7'71 TA111A.' I RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS Nov JOB N ............... DATE OF REPORT ........... TEST DATE TEST MOISTURE UNIT DRY RELATIVE SOIL ELEV. CONTENT DENSITY COIMPACTION TYPE Ft) Al" 6 ww...+w,Es....... r/ E.../. ...,.......E... r,....,.... Y « Aa µ G" 't° a ,r^"1 rr r' rN t". 1,. y M.,,..... n j... f .,,r.....w.. o f . ti , r..+. y. F} «., j....,....,< w rvti ten 9 7 93 JT r vv ts o 7, 2 12, "1 T- RESULTS Ol.;, COMPACTION'T E' S T S 0Poj, REI -)0P ' NOV ..... DATE JOB NO. ............ TEST NO. 2 IDATE moISTURr Ui,,,IT DRY, RELATIVE SOIL TEST CONTENT DENSITY COIMPACTION TYPE, ELEV. ( LBS . /CU . FT .) (96) Ft) M 674 AssOci 4 C I s TATTLE 1. RESULTS OF ColJPACTION TIESTS ry JOB NO ... 0tlovIt19;0 , «Ir IDATEOFREPORT ............ MOISTURE UNNIT "DRY. RELATIVE SOIL ST DATE TEST ComlpACTION TYPE E ELEV. CONTENT DENSITY zo. ( Ft) - - (116) (LBS./CU.FT-) rPART.T: 1 RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS__ JOB t;O ... • , ......... DATE OF TEST DATE T:E;a`C MOISTURE UNIT DRY RELATTV13, SOIIa O. ELEV.CONTENT DENSITY- COMPZMION TYPE Lt) M LB S./CU.PT.) 1! r 2,7r 6 r r r It..1l` f,— Cw`7 C,.t"P I .,! 4+ '.... a...,..r.. e..4..«.. r......<.....,,„....,.x...,.....+r......... x....p..+r.....rr,. way may r e...+...+-.-• t C- x f ' t raw r4 r...........------ TABLE RESULTS OF COMPACTT01111 TESTS 1970 DATE OF REP01W ........... JOBM ................ TES.T DAT. TEST MOISTURE NO. ELEV. CONTENT Ft) 9 7 TZ `7M-7 C, 4 0 7 L6- L- C-1 7T1,7 71 71 7 'Y 7,8 G V W, 3 UNIT DRY DENSITY LBS./CU.FT.) 07,4 l0q, p RELATIVE COMPACTION 111;) 9/,'z 7, 0 soil, TYPE 7' 7-71Z ZT 7 T7- TABLEI RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS JOBTSO.... ............ DATE OF REP6PT. TEST DATIV TEST I MOISTURE UNIT DRY RELATIVE SOIL NO. ELEV. ]CONTENT DENSITY COMPACTION TYPE Ft) LI;S./CU.FT.) Lol— Icy/ 11 1-7 hy I ;K 9.0; ILI rZ L7 14, 4 1 TABLE, 1 RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS JOB -DATE OF REPORT .......... O. . 11 TEST NO. DATE TEST MOISTURE EL EX. CONTENT Ft) UNIT DRY RELATIVE DENSITY COMPACTION LBS./CU.FT.) SOIL TYPE 2 _LlA 711 7 2 Ft" 1 C"" 1 4 4 a p ...... r...,.v... C . f /".l 1 'r" ......:...... ,.v... A... w.= rl '7 c' 72 1 F 2221_ z. 0 2, 77 0i A L-7 7 C/ I TABLE I RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS JOB NO. ........ oy DATE Or REPORT ........... TEST DATE Tl,S'r M 0 1 S T MIZE UNIT DRY RELATIVE SOH, NO. ELEV. CONTENT DENSITY CO,MPACTION TYPE FT) LBS./CU.FT.) 17-7 IT, CIS 0, rl, 77T 7 ij 11J TT Z, 73, 61 2/ 777a, cqlll,ll Z2, 02-1 TZ, c CA 7 4 vz- 7,10 7, 77 n, 7 7_11 TA111,131 -- i it RES13LTS OF COINIPACTION TESTS r J013 No. --? .......... DATE OF REPORT. NCjV 5 1970 TEST DATE TEST MOISTURE' UNIT DRY RELATIVE SOIL NO. ELEV. CONTENT DENSITY COMPACTION TYPE LBS./CU.FT.) tom/ f „, l . r f t 1 7 µ':h.. 727 1 A. r r 15 7,f 2 TABL)"' 1 RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS JOB NO., 140V 1970 1DATEOFREPORT .... 5 ...... TEST DATE TEST MOISTURE UNIT DRY RELATIVE SOIL NO. ELEVI, CONTENT DENSITY COIMPACTION TYPE Ft) LBS./CU.rT.) 141. 7 2 Ic- tLl _7 61" 7 3 I "J, 7 74 c7l, TABLI, 1 RLSULTS 0.).,' C01,',IPACTIO',,l TESTS JoI31\10 , .............. fV 1970 , DATE OF REPORT.: 'O.. ...... I TEST D.,'3 T llTEST M 0 1 s T U illi], UNIT DRY RELATIVE SOIL NO. ELF"'v. CONTENT DENSITY COMPACTION TYPE Ft) M (LBS./CU.)-T.) AL f C)'2 ry 7 1 IT 177, 711 7 r 22 1 Fe T A B 1, 11" RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS JOBNO ... ............... NOV . DATE OF REPORT .. 5.....1970.. TEST D A T TEST MOISTURE UNIT DRY RELATIVE SOIL. NO. ELEV. CON1,1113INT DENSITY COMPPCTION TYPE Ft) LBS./CU.PT.) I I' 7rn P"n, C',c-, J013 Na. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . TEST' DATE TEST ELEV. Ft) ' M 0 1 S T U RE' CONTE -NT UNIT DRY DENSITY, LBS./CU.FT.) v, 1970 DATE OF REPORT . No.......... RELATIVE COMPACTION QI-) 71 6 k. R'^ r,"'t p...4 J :. t n 31 14 14, 4, n 7 r. T A-)- 1,1: 0)1-' C()',PACTION TrSTS, JOB IQO. DATE OF REP01"T 1970 TEST W'ITL TEST Mol. SI]PUIRIE UNIT DRY IRELATVE soill EIJEV. CONTENT D L IN, S ITY CO'ljPTlON T Y 1? Ft) ILI) LBS. /CU. FT. TOT,E .1. JOB N0 .............. N' 0 V 5 1970 DATE OF 1) 0- 1'1, '11 . . . . . . . . . . TEST D.T) T E S "i.' 141,0,f STURE UNIT DIRI-1, 7a":' s 0 1 L No. ELEV. C 01 T 1,,INT DENISITY C P , 7\CTIO'N T 1—P Z' rte i... f J w, E ...,....... 5....,,...., rte i... f J w, E ...,....... 5....,,...., TA111-31"' 1. RESULTS OF COMIPACTION TESTS JOB NO. MW 5, 1970 DATEOF REPORT ........... TEST DATE TEST MOISTURE UNIT DRY RELATIVE SOIL NO. ELEV. CONTENT DENSITY COINIPACTION TYPE Ft)'ULBS. /CU. FT.1 A4, 70 o j 2' Cl L(22- rl Ll LL RY;"c-,UT,TS' OS' MQ aPACTIM Tl' STS JOB 1\10... PES'll DAT)l TEST MOISTURE UNIT DY\Y C() If n — I 7TZo. ELEV. 1) E 1 7 IT Y DATE OF REPOP\T .. NOV ....1970... SOIL T Y P —` T A)l 1,);' RESULTS M7, CO3MPACTIO'1\1 Ti"STS J013 NO .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DATE OF REPOI-IT. 1970 371S,T D A T ll' TEST M 0 T S'l' U RE UNIT DRY RELLIVE SOIL NO. ELEV. CO*NT13,11-T D Ell" S IT Y C0:,'.PACTIOl,,, T Y P Ft) LBS. /CU. FT. jq w. wvw jZr.SULTS OF COM,11)"CTION Tr; 5TS D AT I*':' MOISIPURE, EST JOBNO ........ C( N'TI, N, T ELE,V. D AT I*':' MOISIPURE, EST TEST C( N'TI, N, T ELE,V. Ft) r 1-7o7 I-) k F V I cf, A-, 7 UNIT DRY D h" N S'PPY I,BS./CU.FT.) C ol, 'A p 1 CT 10 N SOIL T'-ZP'-E' NOV 5 1970 1 r I-) k i 013 1\1 0 ............. MOV 1970 D7M'--" OF . . . . . . . .. yy P TTST D 7 '2 31' TEST 1,10 T S TIJI"'Ill U.14IT D.IZY RELA, IVI? No. ELEV. C' 0 _P E', , T DE" ISITY CO:,Ar-,i,, , CT I ON LBS. /cu. FT. S0 I'L T Ft) r M .,...,._ w._.w_r.«..w«w w.w.w._w».w.__...__.. w_,....._. 11 4-5 17 f S0 I'L T TABU 1 RESULTS O.: CO,.`IL C ]. IC)iL T: STNov I c r 1, ,_P C .• ' ,._. .____ 1970 JOE NO. , .. ..« ....... DATE OF REPORT ... ....... TEST DATET MOISTURE. UN IT 1)RY REL T. .TIVI SOIL T NO. CONTEINT DENSITY .. COMPAC.1:IO'N TYPE ELEV. G (LBS./CU.FT. N Ia.. Y F A) rte'"` l `'• 1., t I f 1 / f ico 4 r 8 y i i If w„ .w...«.......,..,,.» ice.+..+.....»,..-!. T 'o r.. ..."..,, .. 1 000 i f f r •' r , r,v CY f R SUL` S 01" M.IPICTION ` ES'a SR_ W 1910 JOB NO.. ..... .... DATE OF REPORT .... 5 ..... . TEST DA`.t'r MAOI STUlrZE ' UN.1_T DRY REI,?' 'I; VE SOI.; NO. TEST CONTENT D1,NSI T `.r COYIPACTION Ill YPEl ELEV . ( ) LBS . /CU. FT.) 7. m f: w.,...,..». mr„r:.......-.r...m..r..+.,....... mf s: -a....... w..m.. r.,........,........ 1. j... r.m.. f I t......«........ LAI .. f a a... r f i 1 .r v r i TAB RESULTS 01. CO'HIACTIO',! T!;'STS I JOB NO ................. NOV 5 1970 DATE Of REPORT ........... TEST D A T.1, TEST MOISTURE UNIT DT Y. R RELATIVE SOIL NO. ELEV. CONTENT DI,.'NSITY C 0 ILI, 11 P .7 C 12 10 N TYPE rt) LBS /CU. FT. c?" wW Z 2, 5) RESULTS _._Mjn2I" I0N, `1'ES` I' SOFclz•C f`, VOV. 5JOBNODATEOFREOR'7 . . TEST DA'sEMOISTU: E UNIT RELATIVE SGML NO. tTEST C ON T E N T DE, N S.T.11-'Y C 01,1 PA CT I ON TYPE ELEV . ll- ? S . / CU . `:i" .) F - t) f 6 r I f o f I u y n-„ p r r j s.w.. r 4-.....r w...,......,.....,.....+,.ems......,.,..,.-_,. r f Y r` I I r fi,...... ii I J +'^. fw.,.....,,....-Y`.... .f,,..«.-...._..,........_...._.....,.....«.......,,+.,....,..,..+........ w+ -.. w+...,.,v,....,,.. ip p a.sm+.va.w.,........«.M.........,....,..,. m....,,...... n.._•srx...-v..w,w....n.v s.s..<.. «,.r..a..,..vw ....w....w,. TAIBLL 1. RESULTS OF CO,,'?.'\CTTON, TESTS 0 v 1970joBDATEOFRIE?Gini' ........... IEST DATE T 11" S T M 0 1 S T UNIT DRY* RE, LP,` - ' 1, ' VE SOIL NO. CONTENT D'I'll S 1' T Y C O.,',"L-1 A C T 1;027 TYPEELEV. Co0.) Ft) ( LY,',S. /CU. FT. o) 71. 7 7— lxµ sl ! »...I .»..,..,.».. '_,...._.... v._,._.._.,. f .. ...... .........,.....,....!/,,.. .yt.,.,,.._.._. _..._..«,.,,....... ` ..,....../................._. _... ..e» j ._»._..._....,... ,_._ ... «...».-.,.,,.,......_.-,..; i n. lz TAnLl-',- 1. RESUL'j-'S OF COMPACTIO'.,'T ri'!STS TEST DATE SOILMOISTURE NO. TYPETESTCONTENT ELEV. Ft) x-5 j- t I I Al) L -L IT I 15 1970DATEOFREPORT ......... . UNIT DRY R E L A T! V F, SOIL DENSITY C0 2 A C 2 1 O'Ll TYPE LBS. /C'U. FT.) j- t I I TABLE IRESULTSOFCOMPACTIONTESTS i t b l a.... . .. . .. . ... 4. ' : a ::? : Name ..... Dote of Repori.. , .. rY. ,x....1.979......... a, TEST too. DAT ` r.1.d ST l IV. _ Ft) MOISTURE CONTENT UNIT DRY DENSITY L,DS./CU. FT.) RELATIVESOIL COMPACTION W TYPE e r Ir TABLE 1 RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS Jots NO., .......' - i ', . 1Vcrrno ........ ®crfe of froport..... P4C,u5 19iU....... , TEST DATE I'T`ST MOISTURE UNIT DRY RELATIVE SOIL NO. ELEV. CONTENT DENSITY COMPAG"iF1ON TYPE FL) LBS./ CU. FT.) v.w I j tm 1 i TABLE I RESUUTS OF COMPACTION TESTS Job /vo.. . ...... ......... vDaloofReport..... 0 .......... 70 DATE TES91 ELEV. Ft MOISTURE COINTENT UNIT D13Y DENSITY LBS./ CU. I-' T.) RELATIVE COMPAC TION SOIL TYPE 711' TADLE I RESULTS OF COMPACTION 'TESTS Job Alo ........ Date of Ropol ........... T ES TT, NO. r DATE T ft, ST ELIEV, MOISTURE CONTEwr UNIT DRY D E M 'S' I TY RELATIVE C 0 A VOT I ON SOIL TYPE LBS./ CU. FT.) 1 RESULTS F COMPACTION Tt CTS Faacrr..,.Dale a"Jab /'a.Mane....... ...:::................... TEST NO. TE TEST ELEV. Ft) MOISTURE CONTENT f) UNIT DRY DENSITY LBS./ CU. FT.) RELATIVE COMPACT16'.4 CAI) SOIL TYPE 1 I if .... M..... e,.......»._............ W..w, TABLE I RESULTS OF COWIPACTICM _I_ "STS 1970VoteofReporl-, .... ........ TEST NO. DATE TEST 1::,7, t) V . Mi 0 13 T U R u IN I T D'R Y RELATIVE SOIL fit) C 0 N TE PvI T 1/ 11) DEf',13ITY COMPACTION TYPE LBS./ CU. FT.) M f-- I J - -- - TABLE f REOULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS Job /Vo.. 11%r, ;GofReport.... ca"c, D . ................ N TEST NO. DATE r.t Sr,1.. FLEV. rt) h C1 r Ui C CON't"ENY y Ui E DRY DENSITY LBS./ CEJ. FT.) RELATIVE COMPACTION V11/r1) SOIL.. TYPE 4 M i TABLE I RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS 070Job /Vo, /Vamo ... ... ........... I ........ I ...... Date of Roport.,- rl'l .. 5 1........... T E -ST* TEST O. NO. DATE TEST ELEV. MOISTURE CONITENT UNIT DRY DENSITY R E L ATI VE COMFIACTION SOIL TYPE 0- B S. c U, FT.) 1 -ABLE I RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS t l f Report........................... s TESTS DATE J MOISTURE UNIT DRY R E -. , SOIL NO. CONTENT DENSITY C,olM.PACTION TYPE P71-17-, 7 A i j71,y w TABLE I RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS Dc/e ofAlamo ..... ...................... Roport. TEs"r DATE T E'S T 001STURE UNIT DRY I RELAINVE Sol L NO. ELEV, CONTEN"' DENSITY COMPACTION TYPE Ft) BS./ CU. Fr.) TABLE I RESULTS OF C01M PACT 101',J TLSTS Job No.. ...................... A"lle of Ropoll ... .......... TEST DATE TEST... h,LEV. 1,1101STURE UNIT DRY RELATIVE SOIL NO. Ft) CONTENT DENSITY C01',4PACTION TYPE LBS./CU. FT.) drib No ............................ TABLE I RESULTS OF COMil"'ACEAI Off' TESTS Alamo ...... Dc'fe Of NO. DATE TE Sl El"Ev. M 0 1 STU R E UNIT DRY RELATIVE SOILCONTENTDITYCPOMACTIONTYPE TABLE I RESULTS OF COIMPACTION TESTS 4:..... :...... f !c r ........ r, "::`. . .................. Dole of Repo., t ..............: :....... . r1ov Ta ST ES TMiJ1STURE UNIT DRY RELATIVE SGML_ TE FtEL E, SIT - '` D E N S 1 T Y C,OM, PAC-t'K)il TYPE rr (" fob LBS./ CU. FT.) w..armw ,wnw.me+wrw «mc r `1 ,. \ F aw eaar ,.mwiw.cv...., . f . w»u-rarnwu sw.eeri wnewonuawwnw.-+•. avmnm `...... r r r w.+..............r+:.... I r..w«v r......._«.......«.r.wv.......s.w..... r..uw...........«..........._..n ..«............r.... - ...+.. ......... r......r..=.+. nw». w.v snd 1 r 1 r r...t J { l TABLE DATE TEST, MOISTURE UNIT DRY REL.AT1!4 SOILNO.,ELEV. CONTENT CaCOMPACTION TYPEpt.) a/a LBS./ FT.) t' J b {,l' ".9 t f^1 0.'m r4 r.rd L`1 k. ;7 - r 1 s i I GF 7 1 r r i 9 3 7(o 93.6 j/ (y g 0 a` n s v b r w.N aY ndM 'vk t, re f 'w,d xiu wl wu4 va+x'rfu"f ndemm't!w„du" uu4f,w*,aw'd< rw.ar„'w nw 6„:wu,au«, .mx'a"u.^*,wG. wx w,i,. C b. >W,k u dfi vre 'nl w}ry iA.MG: .d sr , M, , aab ',F r F aFib" I r off x W N l 4 / t Y df f4n RESuLi C)P COMPACTION 1 Uni JJ%IY P r" jk y Ov s7cr xr rrr 1ian e.` Date of frog/, od. 1 r'r rrrrr rrr r"' r rY rr r'rrrrrrr rrrr • rrrrrar . rrrr a- y F U UNIT pRY 5011EST.TEST ' CO t,DaTE ELEV.' m CONTENTDENSITY COMPACTiON TYPE LBS./ CU. F'T.) a) r C w k 6 v c yam» T: R.0 . ci r7 T f. f 4^ e µ Y YP} 17 F, I TI 17 8 7 Az f y trP X17 r f 7C " TEST, DATE zTEST MOISTURE UNIT DRY RELATIVE SOIL MCt.hr,EV. CONTENT DENSITY COMPACTION TYPE It t) LDS./ CEJ. FT.)„ f0! r r r r 7 r 1:... J:`., f ` / f A ! 1 r j ,. a J Ek 1• moi' F F t%... y .. t 1J FP! A C_ f / tf Gy 4f mm Av IT 1 r,. Y U L2Af J 1 :. wy C,r Y w, s„ a SNa ..Name Lat of Rear 1970,E TEST 1 C7. DATE' WES, LT EV. Ma(STUC E CONTENT t UNIT t7C Y DENSITY RELATIVE COMPACTION SOIL'' TYPEyxQi -'° LBS./ CU. ET.) t 14)2- y f N raj r 1? 0 f S 4f r l G"}p f t,,r X R F,"A MSC n »..`' V : ,C.A/ 1, y ..,M b ii P/ t a jz— jf moi f l f ., (""$,. 4t f p • ry k d `r/ j Y W 4 i pnE TABLE, I RIESULTS CSF coMF'ACi"IdN TESTS k r. r Y,h w G FH u fid' , V d ,y r 1 L7a16 of R,vorf, . NOV 1x70 „f, f Ttl ST TESTDATE' V MOISTURE " UNIT DRY- RELATIVES(?ILNO. CONTENT DENSITY COMPACTION TYPEL,BS./ 011.` -PT.) f wf P'1 . .: /x-171 I S i w a F' i - ,^jf ! P .t—f :,.,. / , l" . / . . f,, rr t'"",,,` . C•,,.,, ,,, r , 17-7 p 6 ' sn l.i % ! ` t . / 1 0 . cis" , x i a t u _. e.. ..... k r. } °" r fir' . i;' r s -• A i TE ST TEST : C. t DATE EL V. MOISTURE CONTENT UNIT DRY EEL,T1'E SC?IL 2 • DENSITY COtAPAC 110 1 TYPEfes? LBS./ f 4 TT ef 31, j YY w , w"' „ i «I y 7 i r rte" n r r f rt4" 04 t .. _ f ' ° .3 o?, n 1 o fFl TABLE C RESULTS ,OF, COMPACTION TESTS A r% Ja,b ariaNd.....C?" •....... Name C?a1e of tsport ' r TE TEST i DATE ELEV. MOISTURE UNIT DRY RELATIVE SAIL NO. CONTENT DENSITY COMPACTION TYPE. e I ) LBS./ CU..FT.) ra p T} 9, SY p i r V n x YF r` Y r a ray b i Y a TEST DATE TEST ELEV_. MCISTUFtE UNIT RELATIVE SOIL NO. CONTENT DENSITY COMPACTION TYPE LBS./,CU. FT.) Yid t r t, 102,4./ 0 2 . r r 1 ry v Yp pP." y(' p M i r x Y e jI 1970 RM NOV p iM%X 4.. TEST „" Nr1' DATE TESTt ELEV. IC7{STIwiRE CONTENT UNIT DRY DENSITY RELAT IVESOIL COMPACTION M7 p K. fTYPE LBS./ CU: PT;), r f r( ffr i , . a.,. C l r (." " k` r.,... t r F w f w.. y y F w d a.. 12, r 5 E r«' t_ ,r " `1 P' Y y r;^ .l` ,p p' r y p` r. f,r? a/1 :c'"" 1 re`" p+ ,r i f w f e,"r f+'p , t^' G p, a B 4y77, r i P"? e r, a TABLC ! TESTS lVa'n7e fa t` `ofRebart. NOV 1i0' x n C i e` DATE.' ry; i'L5T ELEV.. MOISTURE UNIT DRY RELATIVE I Ft) CONTENT', CDENSITYDENIT Y COMPACTION SOIL. TYPI~ ra) LBS./.CU, FT.) ern) 02 0 0 e A J r F+.—_..» F,w.._. 4 w A1, ' A f S''" x","V' (` n w, i ./' y' n M A Jv iLl4: t (;7 rI - I- w s , n e I x• 1 C.+try K ,• "w. w.w I x w of x... 02 0 0 e A J r F+.—_..» F,w.._. 4 w A1, ' A f S''" x","V' (` n w, i ./' y' n iLl4: t (;7 rI - I- w x• 1 C.+try K ,• "w. w.w I x w 2- 02 0 0 e A 0 0 e T A 13 T, r] .1 SULTS Or :'COINIPACTIO-N D2 TEST DATEMOIST[,JRETEST Uls,- IT DRY Rl',LA T I VE SOIL NO ELEV. CONTENT ZENSITY COIMPACTION TYPE Ft) LBS.'/CU.FT.) 1 ON 5,3 cb. 14 E3 L7-- K1, 3 Z T-7 7 y d LA - L Y{ If k . kkpp If hh t C i Yt.:.% r nanan...n.a... ,.,......a.....,....»... a. —..>•-.....-a.-,..w.a.....-....,w,.. JI.,.....,.,. y«.n r TA UTS, Or. COMPACTION w 6 ^iJ,lr ! t r;r ag a ,y ,f r t,, r r 1, I. V s „ ,,., i!' rr "'' /a c,e l . / ° f 'fir orf ,,! Xr rdr „ fr°%h N'td IT /{i!l4gi4 o r240/n i G a - ' : r i NG]G. r p ! u! '!„ r !y f,fs"`l G r lf $rtr r r, r r . r x 1 r r r k rs RESULT` O COMPACTION TE i j,yNr i.r w u r r ,,; p r :, °' q9 t . r~ d/i f d"rf, tiA e r x, f' « r tar *y ' *h9 //y"y k, p/{ r Y y ,, t, , ?,, , ?? . , ^firQ%i L/Ii ti' ; '.i01` %t"Cl t. TEST TESTMOISTUREUNIT DRY 1. REL,ATWE .SOIL. DATE t NO. ELEV. CONTENT DENSITY COMPACTION TYPE e p -0 l3S./CU. T.) lp 1r 1/ e: :, k S( j{ (J // / lf/' 4 ' / r rn• I 6711 ry n 2,( f C r r{ ' r I v µ 0 n I tai y ell le M r- , -y 1, y yd, It 0 ti. a v y .wW w M s 1 p' rt 4„r1 i C`r - I .' A f ,, 'r r ,',,,, tl ,F, 2 f F. er ar M!a pf t'i'p` 5, rYr' Jll rvMM' r tX'•r is i ''/i r iiun'^k r'w<Ud t Ip i% yF r S6,,t d ar Yr //,H rr o /Uo 44..) m,,,, ,,w. ,m r, a ,,sr r °`6,• at Sit r r'yl°?! tVarr c/o of ,hart Nov f 70 T,, TT TN tDATCd7`St TMOISTURE MIT COMPACTION F U T / SOI t Ju,T.) TYPE cl e„ C 4 L Y / I' r 1 4.,. " A w µ aw. C w• O.f q G. -., k Y f .n M" """ / , w P " t- tY n 6 n 4 q 5 µ.,.... ms R• o wt . III" T / / v/' 4 3j h 9 ', 5 1/f./+/y4,I"/ Pd )l91AY l/: ', ktp ., r x'I F WV MV rN• 4+ S/[ m P///+ 1^"ma*y1( l/^/} 4//`i'j n lvry I]/ ryX, r 1(ul` 4/x/"j Ij p/vYl (i I1 y y, r TT k CTT!« s TEST MOISTURE UhJI`D Y RELATIVEi7! ELEV.. `. 'CONTENT -DENSITY °COMPACTION TY Ft) (/o) h (LESS./ CU. FTr) (°Q) y p„ Yl e ct k „ id 1 n I e r tit g dr i f s 1 C C'+'1 1 J it J J ! w t, p ! . ! a i 6 l Gl V Y awg Rm rFd a . ; T" a,.. , a46 l f' w r V 1 M / V to h ' r41y ^ wm, Cha °af por ° r rP[ a f r A Y I hY G - r r F r l ((r T T MOISTURE UNIT. DRY RSL ATlVE5011NO. p TC .E,ST E LEW. CONTENT L CN"ITY COMPACTION TYPOW xBa./CU.,FT.} Ft) r e r a rye. Y^" g„ iT I d www. . +. v,rowrw rmn•.mori. ., nf, M 4. 4 ) 0 t F i t t It C p y 1 - LFl m+m 1 r M a t Ali' n 0 Cr t aJx OlrxJ'- J {k f t J i JrOMPACTIONr r la °" t t>f ¢ / J i jfr ; a r !u JJC q ` J h yr rAww'n '. 4 r r! a a a r W Al ,- r , x a "r < sv., ,r h as r ar a'p» e Vame. :' 777 h TEST TEST DATE ELEV. MOISTURE -''UNIT DRY RELATIVE 'SOIL,- Y` i 0. (Ft) . CONTENT DENSITY TYPECOMPACTION ; " Al, tp " " . ". 6 E e .' • 6 ' , p d . /' a:xux,xm++v. 19? ev 19t' 1 7-4 1 v, (, - r , I -- -,,-z I ", 3 aK f to rr 79 19? ev 19t' 1 7-4 1 v, (, - r , I -- -,,-z I ", h` u"f'"r+ r ) , F r r yw r V r rr " r / J w ' r ,. I ,r r rr r* r) ,.r^ , r yJ:; Y r r 97i 7 r r r j' 9 Y r Y 5; r r i ' r in`I rr c r w 8 g' r, f Nl • : , , ,, V r d E; m / r r ,`'' rs 1 '' Yr'i"r>! %VNO i „ A4.rA ry+5%/ 7R. Y '•.. p 4.. ( d,, r r r %" Y 1 err hhV'"'Y 1. y R ES.0 LTS CSPACT ION f* r'Y sG i7 1 ,. , , •. ,, l V'a'" / 'x"K v J"a1 0X11ratsrVrtrW/ r 1 k" a r s ,dlr r a lV'CXra"1 .. Date of R46rt.: QV TEST ;DATE TEST 'MOISTURE UNIT DRY RELATIVE SOIL. NO. FlV, CONTENT, DENSITY GOL AGT101 TYPE oh LESS,/ CU f` f.) o„ c 7,„' a k r 9 lel f F w. f` 961c. 1 ,°°r e; ,, - *1 T Joe yyNor i ` 103,.,6 k s; Nk Y kk ani r H h , n^,p/{q w,:, f S RESULT CI `rViYf( %CTIVN i` i': p iq z i p. v l^ d r i n, f ^Y r P la; h eaart Pl.. 4 ..... y A u TEST. S, MOISTURE UNIT DRY ;"'' RELATIVE ' DATE SOiSOIL0. TE LL, V. CONTENT", DENSITY COMPACTION TYPE t"ho-a (LBS. C U. F T.) 7,,' ILX 9 3, 11,7 a a" d' i 102. gr oR g u 1, l 0 TEST NO. ` DATE fix ST ; B.r EV. Mt iTURt CONTENT UNIT DIY DFNSITY EEtvATIVC COMPACTION TYPE" E E t)(%) LBS./ CU. F'T.) r jy 4n4 vim- R" 4f + A a,All 5.+ s f'•;wM +w:+" n+ F ' 6'Kr rnw f r" r. 4 e YT yymax/ e J (,/,,) y +/ y fj (,+ i/'`( / y 1 *' jj jy 1, r" /. f/,, /, p 4 J {. (f Xv F r, v J r 2- 7,„± t S P t d J S7- Ci ( 070 y y Cho 7R.1' c 11 t)li...- osc a anr e xv n eco u) M PM M1 A f t Wiwd AP AC) C T 1 a i r G C4 a l.(l l C" co 01qjCbCdt1In 47 d F I'DDk- M Ul a ref C" rt3 E - d C,1 r -T" r ' r".,) P C y 1 rT; r 1u p 1 i P• Ltr;'Y F 4 FA { f , 8 S 0— 9 p...{ FA V1 I pq Q pjFAFqFAH pq FS QJ KI . H k.... 0 r T5f LO ' = fix t ' "'o') C) - C3 ,. d C 1 C.) 1 Lt`) 0- 1rQyk" t l F- B i k}+lV y-( 3- l y""' 0 Id 9 1 1+1,:..l kf, kf,.,FIr o k),' x k7 , l C7 CCco47i d rd s P4 (tea f,., 1 k fl: r a CSS CA.1 F-4 ro Q} h.p :--I y_ I f 9 d I-,{ k -•f ! -$ 1-•1 ` 6- { F# t °1 h P. F -1.. b ra (M; f f f{ f__p E P_lf d p I I f- lkf h, E td F{ 4 .I 1 f._I CfiJ 4';"X, C7 . r - Ctid f"} , ".%! Pt"p 4.,C.7 : i"*• CY,"k Gi'X Kul Cyr44."kf1; 6 y Cf7 :h! tf1 t7, tr) Ul kc) vp to 4ia t-- ca''(7" Cha C F r r CJ a) `,a Cx CK C t-•i I MOM 21 Q V) r ) e wa 4z. S I A i# r4 tG t"t pt lW! LI, p— 1srCo4dk , t - tX1 0 C 1 r4; F. prt h XI C J i C ..b r+ r Lt! C y 4C F'-CCY C ) C D CD d,SY C> C.:7 «_t r Cww C ^-+ wr tq d CLd 0, r -i r.., ).. w•. -d 1'"i i ir-i.'r•R r -.i x_. r -i ,r -i r -i r t r•i. ri' r-'( r°•{ t Gil€"'pR w1 1 s ; raa rl r rl P ) w. rd i,7 Y t 8 # t—$ F 8 I i .' F # FA I FA h q .r "tAC_9 S r C7 BMs E.t A k o Fy F i i q t-1 F p_.,0 6•i F -I k N p....t p. t_. , t.: vp to 4ia t-- ca''(7" Cha C F r r CJ a) `,a Cx CK C t-•i I r Y fj C) k= cx Q3 U 'p, Y' r A G G.7 is"i W G=k r' tnx. W r1 CU a A4 U) Ll Y) r14 t z.q x{ I A rt rld rx-1 Faq P4 P d N a k a{ d rl'1 T I r t 1 C) GU.) r+ Mei(- H 1-4 f f '4-1 H H f-i t--4'r I " F-I f-4 f-i 1 rIf 0 U r p e24 y,) tlJ° I- CX) oT Ci lC"M o.: C"TM CfiY L7 Cj-) - c.& dQ w•w r,'f+' J" f". LI') I_(') t,f) Ly') If) IT) t U-1 U) r^f H H r" f r-1 r--4 r-'{ I H r-1 H H . 1-41--{ 4 fKM 4H F7 d n r a 9 Ui t of", C 1 i.J Z:i Y fk . 6''i f C;. fix, r ry ryY p a M1 M""Y In E'i H^i 8•"Y 1^S M-^i W r , 9(^V k C d t1J yr Cl) F..{ W,"y 4.. d rstS t:), f--t f,.{ fa Yc r' 1'M G'fk i'"f G_) W` k-i FA OF { 61 i, f-i C,) y r-# G"•1 C"Y M : kd") W C"'- Co - M r^-{ Cwl Cr7 tiY 1( V,r," Cx".7 C1 C 7 14 C V Cid C'Q C^") r0 . ff) . 6' ,,. L» A r""B r It 14 P r'-1 6 r-f r-1 i w! r-1 1 r-, t 4- " k a i, r• 4 V : e"" Env C.d7 st c, iJ 1fFlD C y C i Cti G`", co of GLF 9 is TV fGrp Y m p. z rn U) e a d , C„7 i i I Kxi 4 . C!.# r I f k C V t<dy Y• r 7 CJS f! Y rn FA H F! FA 41 a 1 h{ 8"J wt> : > tS. ,, lA"r lia ; 4w> 4 7 ku ra t,G.7 ; t" C^ C` •" t" ^ ' d` ^ C"•• i " C' G% '., v ri a—ir--1 f d