Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTract 34160 (Geotechnical)S. E. Medall & Associates, Inc. .* Consultants in the Earth Sciences 3030 South Bundy Drive, Los Angeles, California 90066 • 2131390 4079 t'- 2168 South Hathaway Street, Santa Ana, Califomia92705. 71415466602 ROUGH GRADE SOILS ENGINEERING AND GEOLGOIC REPORT, TRACT.34160, LOTS 1-17, 20-46,. DIAMOND BAR, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA for DIAMOND RIDGE, A T0I14T VENTURE W. O. 605D November 30, 1978 FILE Subject Date Sent to file Post-n'tilo request pad 7667 I I N S. E. Medall t& Associates, Inc. Consultants in the Earth Sciences 3030 South Bundy Drive, Los Angeles, Cal ilarnia 90066. 2131390,4079 2168 South Hathaway Street, Santa Ana, Cali torn is 92705 • 7141546-6602 November 30, 1978 W. O. 605D Santa Ana Diamond Ridge, A Joint Venture 2130 E. 4th. Street Suite 110 Santa Ana, California 92705 Attention: Mr. Gil Wilksen, Director of Engineering Subject: Rough Grade Soils Engineering and Geologic Report, Tract 34160, Lots 1-17, 20-46, Diamond Bar, County of Los Angeles, California. tReferences: 1) Supplemental Soils Engineering and Geologic Investigation and Grading Plan Review, Tracts 29053, 34161 and 34160, dated December 19,1977 (W.O. 605D) ' 2) Response to Soil Engineering Section Review Sheet, dated February 6, 1978, Tracts 34160, 34161 (Parent Tract 29053), Diamond Bar Area, County of Los Angeles, dated February 20,1978. t' (W. O. 605D) 3) Supplemental Subsurface Exploration, Tracts 29053, 34160, 34161, Diamond Bar, County of Los Angeles, California, dated March 7, 1978. (W. O. 605D) I 4) Response to the Geology Appeal Board for the==;. County of Los Angeles, Tracts 29053, 34160 and 34161, Diamond Bar, California, for the ' County of Los Angeles, dated March 20, 1978. (W. O. 605D) 5) Addendum Comments regarding Soil Engineering Report, dated February 20, 1978, Tracts 34160, 34161, Diamond Bar Area, County of Los Angeles, California, dated March 23, 1978. (W. O. 605D) <� Diamond Ridge, A Joint Venture Page 2 Gentlemen• November 30, 1978 W. O. 605D 6) Comments on Questions Raised by Mr. Dave Popplar regarding Tracts 29053, 34160, 34161, Diamond Bar, County of Los Angeles, California. 7) Tract 29053, 34160.and 34161, Reply to the County of Los Angeles Geologic Review Sheets, dated February 1, 1978 and February 22, 1978, dated March 24, 1978. (W. 0. 605D) 8). Addendum Report for Tracts 29053, 34160 and 34161, Diamond Bar, County of Los Angeles, California, dated May 5, 1978. (W.O. 605D) This is to report the results of tests and observations made during the grading of the subject lots. Conclusions and recommendations relative to the suitability of the grading for the proposed develop- ment, and foundation recommendations for the proposed structures are presented.h.erein. REGULATORY COMPLIANCE All cuts, fills or processing of original ground under the purview of this report have been completed by Robert E. Fulton, General Engineering Contractor, under the inspection of and with.,selective testing by S. E. Medall & Associates, Inc. and in our opinion are found to be in compliance with the Grading Code of the County,of Los Angeles, California. The work reported herein has been re- viewed and is considered adequate for the construction now planned. S. E. Medal! & Associates, Inc. Diamond Ridcre, A Joint Venture Page 3 November 30, 1978 W. O. 605D The purpose of the grading operation was to develop building sites for single-family residences and related improvements. The grading for this portion of the site commenced on July 7; 1978 and ended on November 1, 1978. ENGINEERING GEOLOGY ' General The geologic conditions exposed during the process of grading ' were frequently inspected by our staff geologists. All canyon tcleanouts, subdrain placements, fill keys, cut slopes and the general grading procedures were included in these inspections. The geologic data gathered during grading and the locations of the stabilization devices and other pertinent details are re- ' corded on the enclosed 40-scale grading plans prepared by VTN ' Consolidated Inc. ' Geologic Units Puente Formation: Bedrock underlying the site has been mapped-.. ' as belonging to middle to upper portions of the Puente Formation which is Miocene in age. Bedrock exposed during grading generally consists of light to medium gray siltstones and siliceous shales with medium to coarse grained sandstone interbeds. These sand- stone interbeds are light brown in color and range from a fraction ' of an inch to several tens of feet in thickness. I IS. E. Medal[ & Associates, Inc. 1 1 I [1 [] I 1 I [1 I 1 I Diamond Ridge, A Joint Venture November 30, 1978 Page 4 W. O. 605D Artificial Fill Fills constructed during grading are composed of soils excavated from on -site Puente Formation, alluvium, colluvium and topsoil. These fills consist of various mixtures of silts, sands and clays. Geologic Structure Geologic Structure encountered during grading was found to be generally as anticipated by the above referenced reports. Bedd- ing is generally inclined to the northwest with a generalized dip of approximately 8 to 11 degrees. The bedding is contorted by numerous small fold and minor shears. No evidence of major or recent faulting was encountered during this grading phase. Corrective Grading During grading, earth buttresses were recommended and installed according to the design criteria of the .referenced reports_ These buttress fills were needed to support out -of -slope bedding. `The' - following table lists the buttresses constructed and their re- spective key widths and key depths. LS. E. Medall & Associates, Inc. Diamond Ridge, A Joint Venture Page 5 November 30, 1978 W. 0. 605D LIST OF BUTTRESSES AND STABILIZATION FILLS LOCATION KEY WIDTH KEY DEPTH Lots 5-7 (N.W. side) Shear. Key 15' 44' Lots 7-10 (N.W. side) Shear Key 15' 28' to 44' Lots 10-17 (N.W. side) Shear Key 15, 28' Lots 18-19 (N.E. side) Buttress 20.' 3' Lots 40-44 (N.E. side) Buttress 40' 5' Lots 20-24 IS. side) Buttress 120' 7' Lots 25,28,29 (W. side) Buttress 200' 12' Lots 26-27 IN. side) Buttress 60' S' Lot 26 (N. side) Shear Key 15' 3' Lot 31 (N.E. side) Buttress 10' to 20' 3' Lots 31-34 (N.E. side) Buttress 10' to 40' 3' Lots 39-40 (S.E. side) Buttress 50' S' Subdrainage Subdrains were installed behind all buttress fills*as shown on the buttress detail, page 1 of the grading plans. These subdrains-con- sisted of four -inch diameter perforated pipe embedded in three cubic feet of filter material. ,One line was placed at the heel a of the stabilization device and other lines were placed at verti- cal intervals of approximately 15 feet. The location of these subdrains are shown on.the enclosed grading plans. *except lots 31-34 S. E. Medall & Associates, Inc. I [1 1 [_1 I l Diamond Ridqe, A Joint Venture Page 6 November 30, 1978 W. O. 605D Canyon subdrains were installed as shown in subdrain detail on page 1 of the grading plan. These canyon subdrains consist of eight -inch diameter perforated pipe embedded in about nine cubic feet of filter material.. SOIL ENGINEERING Preparation of Existing Ground 1. Deleterious material such as organic matter and debris was removed prior to placing fill. 2. Canyon areas were inspected by an engineering geologist prior to placing fill. In general,all loose,wet and compressible materials were removed to competent natural ground or bedrock in areas to receive fill. 3. Areas to receive fill were then scarified to a depth of 12 inches, watered and mixed as required to achieve near optimum moisture conditions and were compacted to a minimum relat-ive compaction of 90 percent* using a double 5 x 5 sheepsfoot roller. Fill Placement 1. Fill consisting of onsite.materials was placed in lifts restricted to a few inches in thickness, watered as required to achieve near optimum moisture conditions and was compacted *ASTM 1557-70 S. E. Medall & Associates, Inc. a 1 Diamond Ridge, A Joint Venture November 30, 1978 Page 7 W. 0. 605D 1 to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent* using an 824 rubber -tired tractor with a double 5 x 5 sheepsfoot roller. 2. The maximum depth of fill is approximately 75 feet, located ' below Lot 38. Table lI presents the maximum depth of fill on each lot. 3. Surfaces receiving fill and having a slope gradient steeper 1 than 5:1 or exposing compressible soils were -keyed and benched into bedrock or competent material. ' 4. The transition zone of fill -over -cut slopes was excavated to competent material prior to placing the fill. 1 5. The cut portion of the building pads on the following lots was excavated and replaced with compacted fill to eliminate ' the cut/fill or rock/soil transition: Lots 12-14, 19,22-24, 26-28, 30, 40-44, 45,46 'Tract 34160. This was accomplisSed.. by removing the upper 24 inches and processing'the next 12 inches in place. z 6. All of the subject Lots are fill lots. 7. All Lots above buttress fills were capped with a minimum of ' 3 feet of compacted fill to impede the intrusion of water. *ASTM 1557-70 S. E. Medall & Associates, Inc. J' i i Diamond Ridge, A Joint Venture November 30, 1978 Page 8 W. O. 605D iField Testing i1. Field density tests were performed using the sand cone method (ASTM D-1556), or the drive tube method (ASTMD-2937). The test results are shown in Table I. The approximate locations i of the field density tests are shown on the enclosed grading plans which were prepared by V.T.N. Consolidated Inc. 2. Field density tests were taken'at vertical intervals of iapproximately 2 feet. 3. visual classification of earth materials in the field was the ' basis for determining which maximum density value to employ for a given density test. Frequest one -point checks were per- formed to supplement visual classification. Slopes i1. Compaction on the face of fill slopes was achieved by back - rolling with a double 5 x 5 sheepsfoot roller during con-, istruction, and the slopes were additionally backrolled wlih- ' a 5 x 5 sheepsfoot and grid roller subsequent to construction. a 1 i i ' S. E. Medall & Associates, Inc. I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 11 I Diamond Ridge, A Joint Venture Page 9 November 30, 1978 W. O. 605D 2. Slopes within the subject project have an approximate gradient of 1�:l or flatter and a maximum height of approximately 85 feet. All slopes constructed during this grading phase are considered grossly stable. In order to maintain surficial stability, and minimize erosion, the slopes should be planted as soon as possible; and should be properly maintained against burrowing animals, over -sprinkling and recreational abuse. in addition, proper drainage should be maintained to prevent ero- sion of the slope or saturation of the lots above such slopes (See enclosure:'Erosion Control Recommendations). ' Laboratory Testing Compact'ioii Testing: The laboratory maximum dry density and optimum moisture content for each of the major soil types were determined according to test method ASTM D1557-70. The following table pre- sents'the pertinent test values: Soil Type A Brown -Silty Clay B Brown.Clayey'Silt C Brown Silty Clay C-1 Brown Silty Clay D Brown Sandy, Gravely Silt E Ligh Brown Sandy Silt r Light Brown Clayey Silt G Orange Brown Silty Sand H Light Brown Silty Clay -Maximum Moisture Content Dry 'Density '(.pcf):...,... 117 14 105 21 109 15 112 16 ill 17 110 17 114 17 115 15 103 22 S. E. Medal? & Associates, Inc. Diamond Ridge, A Joint Venture November 30, 1978 Page 10 W. O. 605D Chemical Analysis. Representative samples of the near -surface ' soils were analysed for soluble sulfate content, based on Cali- fornia Test Method 417A. The results of these tests are included ' in the Appendix. In accordance with Section 2604 (c) 2G, UBC (76), the soluble sulfate test results indicate that Type II or V port - land cement should be used in all concrete to be in contact with Ithe soil. ' Soils Expansion Potential. Expansive soil conditions have been evaluated for each lot. Representative samples of the neat pad ' grade soils were recovered for classification and Expansion Index ' testing (Section 2904-B, UBC Standard 29-2). ' The results of these tests and the expansive nature for the building pad are presented in the following table: ' TRACT 34160 .Expansion Expansive ' Lot Number Soil Classification Index Nature 1-7 Brown Sandy, Clayey Silt 57 Medium ' 8-11 12-13 Brown Brown Clayey Clayey Silt Silt 47 _ 55 Low Medium 14-17,19 Brown Sandy Silt 33 Low 20-22, 24-25 Brown Clayey Silt 54 Medium ' 26-29 Brown Silty Sand 7 Very,Low 30-32 Brown Clayey Silt 59 Medium 33-34 Brown Clayey Silt 57 Medium 35-38 Brown Sandy Silt 33 Low ' 39 Brown Clayey Silt 52 Medium 40-44 Brown Sandy Silt 48 Low 45-46 Brown Clayey Silt 54 Medium I 1. S. E. Medall & Associates, Inc. Diamond Ridge, A Joint Venture November 30, 1978 Page 11 W. O. 605D 1 1 FOUNDATION DESIGN PARAMETERS General 1. An allowable soil bearing pressure of 2000 pounds per square foot may be used in proportioning footings for dead plus live ' loads. The above bearing value may be increased by one-third ' when considering short duration seismic or wind loads. Footings should be embedded at minimum depths indicated in Table III*based ' on soil expansion potential and should have a minimum width of 12 inches. 1 ' 2. A friction coefficient for concrete on natural or compacted soil of 0.3 and a passive bearing value of 250 pounds per ' square foot per foot of depth, to a maximum value of 1500 pounds per square .foot, may be employed to resist lateral ' loads. Frictional and passive resistance may be combined with- out reduction provided that footings are placed against pro- perly compacted fill or firm natural ground. 3. Table III* summarizes the design recommendations based on the expansive nature of the subgrade soils as determined by the Expansion Index tests presented previously. *See Appendix: Table III - Residential Foundation/slab Systems. S. E. Medall & Associates, Inc. Diamond Ridge, A Joint Venture November 30, 1978 ' Page 12 W. O. 605D POST -GRADING CRITERIA Trench Backfill See Table IV for recommendations. (Appendix) 1 ' Drainage Positive drainage should be provided around each building to, minimize water infiltrating into the underlying soils. Finished grades adjacent to exterior footings should be sloped down and ' away to facilitate surface drainage. .Footing Inspection ' Prior to the placement of concrete, all footing excavations should be inspected by the Soil Engineer to confirm soil expansiveness, ' to ascertain that the footings are founded on satisfactory soils, ' and to observe that the excavations are free of loose and disturbed materials. 1 Additional Grading " The project Soil Engineer should be notified prior to planned+ 1 and/or future fill placement, site regrading, or backfilling of trenches, subsequent to the rough grading. 1 IS. E. Medall &' Associates, Inc. I Diamond Ridge, A Joint Venture November 30, 1978 Page 13 W. O. 605D SUMMARY This report is limited to the earthwork performed through Nov- Iember 1, 1978, the date of our last observation and testing of compacted soils for the subject project. Based on the results of tests, and on our professional experience, it is our opinion that the grading reported herein has been completed in accordance with the applicable portions of the job specifications and with the recommendations of S. E. Medall & Associates,, Inc. Any fill added beyond the limits shown should be placed under engineering inspection and in accordance with the applicable specifications. IThe compacted fill slopes are considered grossly stable as graded. 'I Protecting the exposed slope surfaces against excessive erosion and saturation is essential if the existing surficial stability is Ito be maintained. This report is subject to review by the controlling authorities for this project. The findings and recommendations of this report were prepared'in ' accordance with generally accepted professional principles and 11 I S. E. Medall & Associates, Inc. ' Diamond Ridge, A Joint Venture Page 14 11 I November 30, 1978 11. 0. 605D practice in the field of soil mechanics, foundation engineering and engineering geology. This warranty is in lieu of all other warranties, either expressed or implied. Respectfully submitted, By: �l%� 2 ►.c �. B CE L. THACKER ' Project Geologist S.E. Medall & Associates, Inc. 1 Reviewed By: LUIS Fy3'RP0ANDO ARACtON R.Cr6096 Principal Engineer S.E. Medall & Associate' , Inc. 4ACK D. THOMP$ON C.E.G. 682 rincipal Geologist S.E. Medall & Associates, Inc. BLT:LFA:JDT:pb ' Enclosures: Table I - Field Density Tests Results Table II - Depths of Fill Table III- Residential Foundation/slabs System 1 Table IV - Trench Backfill Recommendation Soluble Sulfate Test Results ' Erosion Control Recommendation Plate 1 - Geologic Maps Prepared on 40 scale Grading Plans Plate 2 - Density Test Locations Plotted on 40 scale Grading Plans - ' -1 -... --- ' Plate 3 - As Built Geologic Cross -Sections Supervised Grading Insnection Certificate Plate 4 - Geologic Legend. ' c: (6) Addressee F I tS. E. Nlledall & Associates, Inc. TABLE I W. 0. 605D COMPACTION TEST RESULTS Dry Relative Test Date Elev. Moisture Density Compaction Soil No. of Test Test Location (feet) (% dry weight) (pcf) (7) Type 1 7/7/78 Lot 10 /Tr.34160 736- 18 107 92 H. 2 11 Lot 10 739 18 .107 92 H. 3 itLot 10 730 17 107 92 H 4 toLot 10 733 19 107 92 H 5 It Lot 35 743 20 107 92 H 6 It Lot 35 745 20 105 90 A ' 7 Lot 10 742 21 106 91 A 8 7/8/78 Lot 34 /Tr.341.60 754 20 108 92 H 9 Honeybrook " 760 18 107 92. H 10 Lot 40 772 19 107 92 H ' 11 7/10/78 Lot'37/Tr.34160 770 22 104 92 C 12 Lot 11 735 17 107 92 A 13 Lot 35 765 20 107 92 A ' 14 Lot 36 772 11 105 90 A 15 Honeybrook Ln. 768 12 104 93 C 16, Lot 35 768 21 107 91 A 17 Ambushers 740 21 166 91 A 18 Lot 10 730 11 103 92 C' '19 Lot 10 735 16 102 92 C ' 20 21 7/11/78 Lot 10 Ambusher 740 753 15 22 103 100 92 95 C B 22 1,Lot 35 755 15 102 97 B 23 Lot 36 160 15 100 95 B ' 24 Honeybrook" 770 14 105 90 A 25 Lot 10 730 22 105 90 A 26 Lot 11 740 16 101 96 B 27 Lot 10 735. 17 98 .94 B ' 28 Lot 37 760 23 105 90 A 29 " Lot 38 765 21 106 91 -. A 30 Lot 37 765. 20 99 95_ :: B 31 7/12/78 Lot 36/Tr.34160 768 20 123 92 C 32 Lot 38 767 17 119 91 C ' 33 " Lot 36. ;; 770 19 122 91 C . 34 Lot 10 737 22 126 92 C 35 Lot 35 760 22 130 91 A 36 Lot 37 767 20 126 90 A 1 37 Lot 37 768 23 130 91 A 38 " Lot 38 766 22 128 90 A ' 39 40 " Lot 11 Lot 10 745 743 21 23 129 130 92 91 A A S. E. Medall u Associates, Inc. ' TABLE I W. 0. 605D COMPACTION TEST.' RESULTS ' Dry Relative Test Date Elev. Moisture Density Compaction Soil No. of Test Test Location (feet) (% dry weight) (pcf) (%) Type 41 7/13/78 Ambusher/cr.34160 759 21 105 90 A 42 43 Lot 35 Honeybrook " 764 773 22 18 107 101 92 90 A C 44 Lot 12, "' 750 18 106 91 A 45 Lot 10, 730 19 106 91 A t 46 Lot 9 735 20 105 90 A 47 Lot 10 " 734 18 106 91 A 48 Lot 9 " 740 17 106 91 A 49 Lot 8 " 745 16 107 92 A ' 50 Lot 10 740 20 106 91 A 51 52 7/14/78 Lot Lot 17/Tr_34160 10 1. 745 758 17 15 110 106 94 91 A A 53 Lot 36 " 765 17 105 90 A 54 Lot 37 " .770 16 106 91 A ' 55 Honeybrook 775 16 105 90 A 56 7/17/78 Lot 10/Tr.34160 742 20 104 93 C 57 Lot 11 " 747 18 110 94 A ' 58 _ Lot 12 " 752 20 102 91 C 59 Lot 9 744 18 101 90 C 60 61 Lot Lot 13 12 " 750 754 17 16 105 106 90 91 A A 62 Lot 13 753 15 107 92 'A 63 Lot 14 752 20 107 92 A 64 Lot 15 " 738 19 108 92 A 65 Lot 16 735 20 107 92 A 66 7/18/78 Lot 13/Tr.34160 753 12 101 90 C 67 Lot 14 " 755 14 103 92 C . 68 Lot 17 " 725 16 110 95 A ' 69 70 Lot Lot 19 13 " 720 757 20 15 106 105 91. 90 : A )k-, 71 Lot 16 "' 740 17 100 95 B 72 Lot 14 758 21 .97 93 B 73 Lot 15 " 745 15 105 .91 A 74 Lot 16 740 16 104 92 C '75 Lot 17 "' 727 16 107 91 A 76 Lot 12 " 755 15 105 90 A I I ' S. E. P7ledall u AssocW s, inc. TABLE I 0. W. 605D COMPACTION TEST RESULTS ' Dry Relative Test Date Elev. Moisture Density Compaction Soil No. of Test Test Location (feet) (% dry weight) (pcf) (%) Type 77 7/19/78 Ambusher/Tr.34160 760 21 104 .90 A '78 79 Lot Lot 10 13 " 11767 753 17 16 102 102 91 91 C C 80 Lot 35 770 22 103 92 C 181 Lot 36 773 16 100 95 B ' 82 Lot 37 775 25 89 92 B 83 Lot 38 W 776 23 92 90 B 84 Honeybrook '' 758 20 97 92 B 85 Lot 10 760 16 98. 94 B ' 86 Lot 10 762 15- 98 93 B 87 Lot 11 763 21 110 94 A ' 88 89 Lot Lot 10 9 765 766 16 19 101 98 91 94 C B 90 Lot 10 768 16 101 90 C 91 Lot 11 "' 770 22 105 90 A ' 92 Lot 12 760 23 107 92 A 93 Lot 15 747 .15 100 90 C 94 Lot 17 730 20 110 95 A 95 Lot 11 765 16 97 93 B ' 96 Lot 40 777 17 107 92 A 97.,... Honeybrook " 778 20 98 93 B ' 98 99 Lot Lot 37 36 775 776 15 20 105 98 90 93 B B 100 Lot 37 778 17 100 , 95 B '101 7/20/78 Lot 36/Tr.34160 779 14 104 93 C 102 Lot 10 " 755 15 103 92 C 103 Lot 40 780 23 97 93 B Lot 11 766 16 105 90 A t104 105 Lot 13 "' 764 17 .98 93 B 106 Lot 15 "" 750 21 109 94 A 107 108 Lot Lot 17 7 735 750 15 16 98 101 94, ..,;-.. 90 B C 109 Lot '8 " 753 20 107 92 A 110 Lot 9 755 14 99 94 B ill Lot 40 "' 7.85 21 104 93 C 11 1 S. E. kledall &.Associates, Inc. TABLE I 41. 0. 605D COMPACTION TEST RESULTS Dry Relative Test Date Elev. Moisture Density Compaction Soil No. of Test Test Location (fe6t) (% dry weight) (pcf) (%) Type 112 7/21/78 Lot 40/Tr.34160 790 15 101 90 C 113 Lot 40 795 20 '100 90 C. 114 Honeybrook 798 18 102 91 C 115 Lot 40 800 20 101 90 C 116 Lot 39 805 19 101 90 C 117 Lot 40 810 15 103 92 C 118 Lot 41 "' 806 19 96 91 C 119 Lot 39 "' 810 21 102 91 B 120 Lot 37 785. 22 101 90 C 121, Lot 37 790 20 100 90 I 122 Lot 61 800 15 97 92 B 123 Lot 62 803 17 95 90 B 124 Honeybrook 800 21 100 90 C 125 Lot 61 "' 805 21 96 91 B Lot 40 815 19 99 95 B '126 127 Lot 39 812 19 95 90 B 128 Lot 42 800 21 98 .93 B 129 Lot 37 "' 800 19 100 95 B Lot 35 775 17 105 93 C '130 131. Lot 39 820 19 96 92 B 1'32 Lot 62 820 17 101 90 C Lot 40 826 20 110 95 A '133 134 Lot 62 825 20 97 92 B 135 Lot 39 825 20 98 93 B Lot 40 „ 828 20 101 91 C '136 137 Lot 38 800 16 97 92 B 138 Lot 37 803 19 99 94 B 139 Honeybrook 800 17 105 93 C 140 Lot 41 808 17 101 90 C .141 Lot 6 755 21 110 94 A 142 " Lot 5 764 18 95 90 - B '143 144 Lot 12 Lot•14 "' 770 775 17 20 104 96 "' 93 92 _C B 145 Lot 16 "' 773 18 99 95 B 146 7/22/78 Lot 39./Tr.34160 828 25 94 90 B 147 " Lot 62 7 832 18 98 93 B 148 Lot 38 815 18 102 91 C 149 Lot 39 825 19 110 95 A 150 Lot 37 " 810 20 102 91 C 1 S. E. Medall & Associat TABLE I W. 0. 605D COMPACTION TEST RESULTS Dry Relative Test Date Elev. Moisture Density Compaction Soil No. of Test Test Location (feet) (% dry weight) (pcf) (%) Type 151 7/24/78 Lot 39/Tr.34160 830 15 103 92 C 152 11Lot 62 832 16 103 92 C 153 Lot 61 833 20 103 92 C 154 Honeybrook " 800 19 104 93 C 155 Lot 10 760 21 108 92 A 156 Lot 10 762 21 107 91 A 157 Lot 9 765 16 102 91 C 158 Lot 10 .765 20 104 93 C 159 Lot 8 766 15 100 95 B �160 Lot 7 768 14 99 94 B 161 ". Lot 6 770 17 99 95 B •.162 Lot 5 777 16 106 94 A 163 Lot 6 778 21 ill 95 A .164 Lot 7 780 15 103 92 C 165 Lot 8 782 20 104 93 C 166 Lot 9 784 22 ill 95 A 167 Lot 10 785 22 110 94 A 168 Lot 11 788 21 106 91 A 169 Lot 12 780 20 106 91 A 170 Lot 35 805 21 106 91 A 171 Lot 36 808 20 105 90 A 172 Lot 37 812 21 106 91 A 173 7/25/78 Lot 61/Tr.34160 731 18 ill 95 A 174 91Lot 5 785 20 104 93 C 175 " Lot 6 788 18 102 91 C 176 Lot 7 790 15 102 91 C .177 " Lot 8 790 20 101 90 C 178 Lot 9 795 18 102 91 C 179 Lot 10 796 20 101 90 C 160 Lot 11 798 15 101 90 -. C 181 TO Lot 5 788 16 102 91•._ C 182 " Lot 6 " 790 15 101 90 C 183 1.Lot 7 790 13 110 95 A 184 1.Lot 5 790 13 105 90 A 185 It Lot 5 " 792 18 101 90 e' C 186 Lot 6 11794 15 103 92 C 187 Lot 5 794 14 100 90 C .188 Lot 7 795 16 105 93 C 189 Lot 8 TO796 17 100 95 B 190 TO Lot 9 1798 16 104 93 C .191 " Lot 10 1.800 18 104 93 C I L. E. P9edall & Associates, Inc. 1 , ' TABLE I 0. W. 605D COMPACTION TEST RESULTS Dry Relative Test Date Elev. Moisture Density Compaction Soil No. of Test Test Location (feet) (% dry weight) (pcf) (%) Type 192 7/25/78 Lot 11/Tr.34160 800 17 99 94 B .193 194 Lot Lot 5 6 "' 798 799 15 16 103 101 92 90 C C -195 Lot 5 " 800 17 100 90 C 196 Lot 9 798 21 106 91 A ,197 Lot 18 "' 730 18 102 91 C 198 Lot 18 735 16 102 91 C 199 Lot 5 803 15 100 95 B Lot 6 805 20 102 91 C '200 201 Lot 38 "' 820 20 101 90 C 202 Lot 37 819 19 103 92 C 203 204 Lot Lot 36 35 818 817 21 16 102 98 91 93 C B 205 Lot 17 "' 738 15 102 91 C 206 Lot 5 " 808 19 101 90 C 207 7/26/78 Lot 6/Tr.34160 810 14 103 92 C 268 Lot 5 811 18 102 91 C 209 ". Lot 7 794 19 101 91 C 210.. Lot 8 " 793 18 102. 91 C 211 Lot 9' "' 800 20 102 91 C Lot 10 800 15 104 92 C '212 .213 Lot 17 740 20 100 90 C 214 Lot 5 815 20 102 91 C 215 Lot.6 "' 816 20 103 92 C 216 Lot 5 818 18 102 91 C 217 Lot 7 "' 798 17 105 94 C 218 Lot 8 " 796 16 97 92 B Lot 9 803 16 95 90 B '219 . 220 Lot 4 "' 798 12 106 94 C ••221 Lot 5 "' 820 17 96 91 - B '222 .223 Lot Lot 6 5 818 822 17 21 98 101 94, 96 ;:: B . B'- 224 Lot 4 "' 806 17 95 91 B 225 Lot 5 825 22 95 90 B '226 Lot 4 810 21 94 90 B 227 Lot 6 "' 822 18 94 90 B 228 Lot 7 805 14. 98 93 B 229 Lot 4 "' 815 21 97 92 B 230 Lot 5 " 828 18 100 95 B 231 Lot 4 " 820 20 100 95 B 232 233 " Lot Lot 5 6 830 825 21 18 102 104 91 93 C C 234 Lot 7 810 20 103 92 C 235 Lot 8 800 15 102 91 C i S. E. PAtidall & Associates, Inc. I TABLE I W. 0, 605D COMPACTION TEST RESULTS Dry Relative Test Date Elev. Moisture Density Compaction Soil No. of Test Test Location (feet) (% dry weight) (pcf) M Type 236 7/26/78 Lot 5/Tr.34160 833 19 106 94 C 237 " Lot 4 823 19 105 94 C 238 Lot 6 828 18 106 94 C 239 Lot 7 815 19 105 94 C 240 Lot 9 805 20 101 90 C 241 7/27/78 Lot 8/Tr.34160 806 17 108 92 A 242 Lot 5 835 19 104 93 C Lot 4 825 16 101 91 C '243 244 Lot 5 837 20 103 92 C 245 Lot 6 830 20 102 91 C 246 Lot 7 820 21 102 91 C '247 Lot 8 815 14 101 90 C 248 Lot 9 810 20 .103 92 C 249 Lot 10 805 18 103 92 C Lot 15 840 20 103 92 C '250 251 Lot 4 828 16 98 93 B 252 Lot 4 830 17 97 92 B 253 Lot 5 843 17 98 93 B 254 " Lot 4 833 14 98 94 B 255 =<_ Lot 6 833 23 94 90 B Lot 4 835 18 103 92 C '256 257 Lot 4 848 21 95 91 B 258 Lot 5 845 15 100 95 B 259 Lot 4 .840 18 99 94 B Lot 4 843 20 101 90 C '260 261 Lot 8 818 17 99 94 B 262 Lot 10 808 23 107 95 C 263 Lot 5 847 18 106 91 A 264 Ambusher 805 16 106 91 A 265, Lot 4 845 15 102 91. ... C 266 Lot 4 847 15 102 .• 91, C, '.267 Lot 6 835 18 103 92 C 268 Lot 6 837 15 96 92 B 269 Lot 7 825 16 99 90 E Lot 7 828 16 98 90 E '270 1271 11 Lot 8 820 17 .99 90 E 272 " Lot 9 812 16 101 90 C 1 tS. E. Medall & Associates, Inc. TABLE I W. 0. 605D ' COMPACTION TEST RESULTS Dry Relative Test Date Elev. Moisture Density Compaction Soil ' No. of Test Test Location (feet) (% dry weight) (pcf:) M Type 273 7/28/78 Lot 4/Tr,34160 850 21 110 95 A 274 " Lot 13 " 768 14 102 91 C 275 of Lot 35 819 20 101 91 C 276 Lot 36 " 820 19 103 92 C 277 278 Lot Lot 37 " 38 822 826 20 20 102 103 91 92 C C 279 Lot 39 832 19 103 92 C 280 Lot 44 " 821 21 104 93 C '281 Lot 43 822 19 103 92 C 282 Lot 62 W 830 is- 101 90 C 283 Lot 40 It. 832 18 101 90 C .284 Lot 15 " 754 18 101 90 C ' 285 Lot 14 " 760 20 103 92 C 286 Lot 15 " 759 20 101 90 C ' 287 7/31/76 Ambusher/Tr.34160 808 16 105 90 A 288 Honeybrook " 312 i8 100 90 C 289 Lot 35 " 821 18 112 96 A ' 290 Lot 36 " 824 15 107 92 A 291- Lot 37 " 826 16 103 93 D 292 Lot 38 830 18 101 90 C 293 Lot 39 " 834 16 104 93 C ' 294 Lot 40 " 824 18 102 91 C 295 Lot 41 "' 822 18 105 94 C '296 297 Lot Lot 42 " 43 " 823 822 16 17 105 104 90 90 A A 298 Lot 44 " 823 17 99 90 D 299 Lot 9 " 813 16 101 91 C 300 Lot 8 " 820 16 103 92 C 301 Lot. 7 " 830 16 104 93 C 302 Lot 6 " 838 17 104 90 A Lot 5 "' 847 16 106 "' 9.4 = -?C '303 304 Lot 4 " 848 15 106 91 C 305 Lot 3 " 820 18 107 92 A ' 306' 307 Lot Lot 3 " 2 " 824 825 18 18 101 103 92 93 , D D 308 Lot 3 " 828 18 101 90 C 309 Lot 2 " 829 17 104 93 C 310 Lot 3 ". 832 i5 104 93 C 311 8/1/78 Lot 35/Tr.34160 821 21 96 91 -B Lot 36 " 826 15 108 93 A '312 313 Lot 37 " 828 18 104 90 A .314 Lot 38 " 832 18 97 92 B '315 316 Lot Lot 39 " .40 " 836 826 18 18 105 102 93 91 C C 317 Lot 4 " 853 16 109 93 A 318 Ambusher " 810 15 104 94 D S. E. Medal[ & Associates, Inc. TABLE I W. 0. 605D COMPACTION TEST RESULTS ■ Dry Relative Test Date Elev. Moisture Density Compaction Soil ' No. of Test Test Location (feet) (% dry weight) (pcf) (%) Type 319 8/1/78 Lot 42 /Tr.34160 825 15 100 90 C Ambusher 815 15 101 92 D '320 321• Lot 3 835 16 104 93 C 322 Lot 9 814 16 95 86 D 323* Lot 9 814 16 105 95 D 324 Lot 8 821 16 102 91 C 325 Lot 7 831 17 102 91 C 326 Lot 6 838 16 101 90 C 327 " Lot 5 847 20 102 91 C 328 Lot 4 850 17 102 91 C 329 Lot 3 828 18 101 90 C Lot 2 829 18 102 91 C '330 331 Lot 4 852 17 102 93 D 332 Lot 3 830 16 101 90 C 333 Lot 3 835 17 103 92 C 334 Lot 4 854 17 102 91 C 335 8/2/78 Lot 2/T'r.34160 835 15 ill 96 A 336 Lot 2 838 15 101 91 D 337 Lot 3 840 16 101 90 C 138 Lot 8 822 16 100 90 C Lot 4 845 14 99 90 D '339 340 Lot 3 845 14 94 .90 B 341 Lot 7 832 18 106 94 C 342 Lot 4 .848 17 103 92 C Lot 3 848 20 99 90 D '343 344 " Lot 3 850 19 100 90 C 345 Lot 2 845 21 100 90 C '346 347 Lot Lot 40 41 828 825 15 18 103 100 92 90 C C 348 Lot 42 825 14 101 90 C 349 Lot 43 825 19 101 -• 90 C 350 Lot 44 822 20 105 94 -C 351 Lot 44 825 15 zQ8 93 B 352 Lot 43 " 826 21 104 '93 C Lot 12 " 775 20 103 92 C '353 354 Lot 13 772 20 104 93 C 355 Lot 14 770 19 101 90 C 356 357 Lot Lot 15 16 " 766 760 19 21 100 102 90 90 C C 358 8/3/78 Lot 36/Tr.34160 827 14 103 92' C 359 Lot 37 " 835 21 104 92 C 360 Lot 38 837 16 102 91. C *Retest of Previous failing test 1 S. E. Medall & Associates, Inc. Test Date No. of Test 361 8/3/78 362 " 363 " 364 " 365 " 366 " 367 " 368 " 369 " 370 " 371 " 372 " 373* (372) 374 375 " 376 " 377 " 378 " 379 " 380- 381 " 382 " 383 " 384 " 385 " 386 " 387 " 338 " 389 " --390 " 391 " 392 " 393 " 394 " 395*(393) 396 " 397 " 398 " 399 " 400 " 401 " TABLE I COMPACTION TEST RESULTS Test Location Lot 39/Tr.34160 Lot 40 " Lot 41 " Lot 42 Lot 43 " Lot 44 " Lot 44 " Lot 43 " Lot 42 " Lot 15 " Lot 14 " Lot 6 " Lot 6 " Lot 13 " Lot 14 Lot 13 " Lot 4 " Lot 3 " Lot 2 " Lot 13 " Lot 14 " Lot 12 " Lot 13 " Lot 14 " Lot 4 " Lot 3 " Lot 2 " Lot 12 " Lot 13 " Lot 3 " Lot 2 " Lot 41 " Lot 41 " Lot 42 Lot 41 Lot 40 " Lot 41 " Lot 41 " Lot 40 " Lot 61 " Lot 61 " i*Retest of previous failing tests W. 0. 605D Dry Relative Elev. Moisture Density Compaction Soil (feet) (% dry weight) (pcf) (%) Type 838 17 103 92 C 838 21 100 90 D 837 17 102 91 C 834 18 107 95 C 827 17 100 90 D 823 16 96 92 B 830 20 104 93 C 832 16 106 94 C 835 16 107 95 C 770 15 104 93 C 775 16 102 93 E 838 18 94 85 E 838 18 102 93 E 775 18 103 94 E 778 18 102 93 E 779. 18 101 92 E 851 21 101 92 E 852 17 102 91 C 850 20 101 91 E 778 20 102 91 C 780 21 103 93 E 780 14 99 90 E 782 14 99 90 E 782 15 101 92 E 853 14 101 92 E 854 15 102 93 E 852 16 102 93 E 785 14 101 91 E 786 14 100 91 E 858 14 102 92 E 857 13 100 91 E 836 16 104 92- :C 837 13 99 88 C 835 10 103 92 C 837 15 102 91 C 838 20 101 90 I 845 13 100 90 D 850 15 101 91 D 848 19 102 91 C 840 16 101 90 C 842 16 100 90 C I S. E. Medan & AssmiaN I ' TABLE I W. 0. 605D COMPACTION TEST RESULTS ' Dry Relative Test Date Elev. Moisture Density Compaction Soil No. of Test Test Location (feet) (% dry weight) (pcf.) (%) Type 402 8/4/78 Lot 60/Tr.34160 843 20 102 91 C 403 Lot 62 842 21 102 91 C 1 404 Lot 63 " 844 17 101, 90 C 405 Lot 60 " 844 17 101 90 C 406 Lot 61 " 843 14 102 91 C '407 Lot 62 " 844 17 104 93 C 408 Lot 63 " 845 18 103 92 C 409 Lot 61 ?45 17 102 93 E 410 Lot 40 850 17 100 90 C 411 Lot 41 " 850 17 102 93 E 412 Lot 42 " 850 17 100 91 E 413 Lot 43 850 16 103 94 E 414 Lot 44 " 850 18 101 90 C 415 Lot 64 845 20 102 .91 C '416 8/7/78 Ambusher/Tr. 34160 714 14 110 94 A 417 Lot 1 718 15 110 94 I 418 Lot 61 847 19 99 90 E Lot 61 848 20 98 90 E '419 420 Lot 62 848 20 102 93 E 4:21 Lot 60 849 18 100 91 E 422 423 Lot Lot 61 62 850 850 18 18 101 102 92 93 E E 424 Lot 61 851 20 100 91 E 425 Lot 61 852 22 103 94 E '425 Lot 62 852 16 100 94 E 427 Lot 60 853 17 102 91 C 428 Lot 60 853 19 102 91 C Lot 61 854 19 101 90 C '429 430 Lot 44 852 19 101 91 C 431 Lot 43 852 16 102 91 C '432 433 Lot Lot 42 41 853 853 20 22 104 103 93, 92 ,;: -C C" 434 Lot 40 851 18 101 91 C 435 Lot 63 847 16 101 91 C '435 Lot 62 850 15 101 90 C 437 tot 64 854 20 103 92 C 438 Lot 61 856 19 102 91 C ' 439 8/8/78 Lot 13YTr.34160 790 16 100 91 E 440 Lot 12 785 23 95 90 B Lot 11 802 17 103 92 C '.441 442 Lot 12 787 16 107 92 A I S. E. Medall & Associatt TABLE I W. 0. 605D COMPACTION TEST RESULTS ' Dry Relative Test Date Elev. Moisture Density Compaction Soil . ' No., of Test Test Location (feet) (% dry weight) (pcf) (%) Type 443 8/8/78 Lot ll/Tr.34160 789 18 102 91 C 444 Lot 12 790 15 102 91 C '445 Lot.60 "' 855 17 102 91 C 446 Lot 60 857 17 101 90 C 447 Lot 61 858 18 103 92 C 448 Lot 62 854 18 103 93 D 449 8/9/78 Lot 23/Tr.34160 735 19 110 95 A '450 451 Ambusher Lot 36 1.715 "' 830 20 18 109 100 93 91 I D 452 Lot 60 860 18 104 94 D 453 Lot 60 860 16 108 93 D '454 " Lot 61 861 16 103 93 D 455 Lot 62 860 17 102 92 D 456 Lot 62 860 17 101 92 D Lot 62 "' 860 18 102 93 D '457 458 Lot 61 861 16 100 90 C 459 ". Lot 11. "' 802 18 101 91 C '460 461 Lot Lot 10 10 "' 608 809 17 18 105 103 94 92 C C 462 Lot 35 823 17 103 92 C 463 Lot 35 835 17 102 91 C '464 Lot 38 "' 838 18 103 92 C 465 Lot 39 838 17 104 93 C 466 Lot 45 844 17 104 93 C Lot 46 858 16 103 92 C '467 468 Lot 45 846 16 105 90 A 469 Lot 44 855 17 101 92 D �•470 Lot 23 738 17 100 90 D 471 8/10/78 Lot 45/Tr.34160 848 18 105 94. C 472 Lot 59 ". 862 18 104 _ 94 D '473 Lot 60 "' 862 15 103 93 "'D 474 Lot 61 863 15 105 95 D 475 Lot 62 "' 863 14 104 94 D 476 Lot 62 IF 864 14 106 90 D 477 " Lot 61 865 17 102 91 ` C 478 Lot 62 865 17 103 92 I Lot 62 866. 16 102 92 D '479 480 Lot 59 865 16 103 93 I. 481 Lot 60 866 17 101 91 D. 482 Lot 61 866 16 101 90 C I IS. E. Madall & Associates, Inc. a TABLE I W. 0. 605D COMPACTION TEST RESULTS Dry Relative Test Date Elev. Moisture Density Compaction Soil No. of Test Test Location (feet) (% dry weight) (pcf) (%) Type 483 8/11/78 Lot 59/Tr.34160 868 17 103 92 C 484 Lot 60 869 16 109 94 A 485 Lot 61 859 17 103 92 C 486 Lot 62 868 17 105 94 I 487 Lot 59 870 18 106 91 A 488 Lot 60 871 17 101 90 C 489 Lot 61 871 17 103 92 C 490 " Lot 62 " 870 17 103 92 C 491 Lot 63 870 18 100 91 D 492 Lot 9 815 15 106 91 A 493 Lot 8 821 16 106 91. A 494 Lot 7 831 17 102 91 C 495 Lot 61 870 14 107 92 A 496 Lot 62 " 874 14 .104 94 D 497* Lot 4/5(slope) -856 14 95 87 E 498 Lot 60 873 17 104 94 D 499 Lot 59 875 17 103 92 C 500 Lot 60 875 14 105 94 C 501 Lot 61 875 17 105 93 C 502 Lot 62 " 878 17 103 93 D 503 Lot 63 875 16 105 95 D 504 Lot 61 " 880 17 102 93 D 505 8/15/78 Lot 29/Tr.34160 750 15 100 91 E 506 " Lot 29 745 19 100 91 E 507 Lot 29 750 20 102 93 E 508 Lot 29 755 23 102 92 E 509 Lot 29 758 17 100 91 E 510 Lot 29 760 18 101 92 E 511 Lot 29 748 18 101 91 E 512 Lot 29 765 23 103 93 E 513 Lot 29 768 20 102 9-2 E. 514 Lot 29 " 770 20 99 90 E 515 8/16/78 Slope 24/18" 768 19 100 91 E 516 " 775 20 96 91 B 517 24/19" 750 19 102 93 E 518 24/19" 752 16 101 92 E 519 25/27" 760 17 104 94 E 520 " 765 19 101 92 E 521 Lot 29 " 775 21 103 94 E 522 Lot 29 777 18 101 92 E 523 Lot 29 780 20 101 92 E 524 Lot 29 785 20 101 .92 E *Restest 845 S. E. Piladall & Associates, Inc. TABLE I 605D W. 0. COMPACTION TEST RESULTS Dry Relative Test Date Elev. Moisture Density Compaction Soil No. of Test Test Location (feet) (% dry weight) (pef) (%) Type 525 8/16/78 Lot 29/Tr.34160 790 20 101 92 E 526 Lot 29 783 21 102 93 E '.527 Lot 29 .781 21 102 92 E 528 Slope 25/72" 780 22 102 93 E 529 Lot 72 785 20 100 91 E Lot 71 788 18 101 92 E '530 531 " Lot 70 792 20 100 91 E 532 Lot .69 795 23 101 92 E 533 Lot 68 800 20 102 93 E 534 8/17/78 Lot 18/Tr.34160 770 16 102 91 C 535 Lot 19 760 16 106 95 C t 536 Lot 19 " 765 20 103 92 C 537 It Lot 19 770 14 103 92 C 538 Lot 72 775 21 101 91 C Lot 24 745 20 101 90 C '539 540 Lot 24 748 25 106 91 A 541 Lot 25 750 21 103 92 C Lot 24 755 20 103 92 C . '542 544 Lot 19 778 16 101 92 D 545 Lot 19 775 21 104 93 C Lot 18 762 14 101 90 C t546 547 Lot 1.8 768 16 101 92 D 548 " Lot 19 770 17 102 92 D 549 " Lot 19 " 772 20 103 92 C 550 Ambusher 775 20 102 91 C 551 Lot 73 780 17 102 92 D 552 Lot 73 778 19 100 91 D 553 Lot 18 770 15 102 92 D 554 Lot 47 865 20 101 92 D 555 Lot 2 870 16 101 92 D . 556 8/18/78 Lot 1M.34160 770 14 94 90 r B " 557 Lot 26 750 16 101 92 E 558 Lot 27 752 15 102 92 E 559 Lot 27 751 20 101 91 E 560 Lot 26 753 18 102 93 E 561 Lot 23 756 16 101 92 E " Lot 24 758 17 100 91 E '562 563 Lot 23 760 22 102 93 E 564 Lot 26 755 17 101 92 E ' 565 Lot 27 756 15 101 91 E ' S. E. Medal! & Associat ' TABLE I W. 0. 605D COMPACTION TEST RESULTS ' Dry Relative Test Date Elev. Moisture Density Compaction Soil No. of Test Test Location (feet) (% dry weight) (pcf) (%) Type 566 8/18/78 Lot 25/Tr.34160 760 22 102 93 E 567 Lot 27 762 25 106 96 E •568 Lot 3 FRG 16 118 93 E 569 Lot 4 FRG 13 115 93 E 570 " Lot 5 FRG 14 115 92 E 571 " Lot 6 FRG 14 118 94 E 572 Lot 7 FRG 17 121 94 E 573 Lot 8 FRG 16 116 91 D 574* Lot 3/slope 856 16 108 85 F.. Lot 9 FRG 14 118 94 D t575 .576 Lot 10 FRG 16 119 92 E 57.7** Lot 3/91ope " 862 15 105 63 E Lot 26 760 15 117 93 E '578 579 Lot 22 745 20 124 94 E 8/21/78 Lot 26/Tr.34160 760 22 94 90 B '580 581 Lot 27 762 14 100 91 E 582 Lot 26 764 17 101 92 E 583 Lot 25 762 22 103 93 E 584 Lot 24 760 22 102 93 E 585 Lot 23 755 25 107 97 E 586 Lot 22 750 16 101 92 E Lot 21 740 17 100 91 E '587 �588 Lot 20 730 20 100" 91 E 589 Lot 27 " 765 18 101 92 E Lot 26 767 16 101 92 E '590 591 Lot 27 769 25 106 96 D 592 Lot 38 FRG 16 106 96 E 593** Lot 3/slope 859 16 97 88 D 594 Lot 37 FRG 12 101 92 E •. 595*** Lot 5/slope 843 15 ' 92 84 C 596 Lot 68 603 18 103 92 -• C 597 598 " Lot Lot 68 69 " 805 804 18 18 101 102 90 _..:- 91 C C 599 Lot 70 "_ 806 18 103 92 C 600 Lot 36 FRG 14 101 92 D '601 Lot 35 FRG 14 104 93 C 602 Lot 40 FRG 13 105 95 D 603 " Lot 41 " FRG 10 199 90 E ' 604 8/22/78 Lot 27/Tr.34160 770 16 102 93 E 605 Lot 42 11FRG 14 105 96 E '606 607 " Lot Lot 43 11 FRG. FRG 16 15 103 102 94 92 E D •608 Lot 12 FRG 14 105 95 E ' *Retest #740 FRG - Finished Grade **Retest #760 ***Retest!`885 S. E. PV1gda11 t4 Associates, Inc. 0 I ' TABLE I W. 0. 605D COMPACTION TEST RESULTS Dry Relative Test Date Elev. Moisture Density Compaction Soil No. of Test Test Location (feet) (i dry weight) (pef) M Type '609* 8/22/78 Lot 4/Tr.34160 845 15 94 85 E. 610 IfLot 15 FRG 10 105 95 E 611 Lot 16 FRG 15 106 94 C 612 Lot 17 FRG 14 102 92 E 613 " Lot 20 735 15 102 93 E '614 61-5 Lot Lot 21 22 745 755 17 17 102 102 93 93 E C 616 Lot 23 760 20 102 93 E 617 Lot 24 764 21 104 92 E '618 Lot 25 765 16 101 92 E 61.9 Lot 26 768 20 100 91 E 620 Lot 27 772 20 101 92 E Lot 28 770 20 '99 90 E '621 622 Lot, 20 740 21 100 91 E 623 Lot 21 750 20 101 92 E '624 625 Lot Lot 22 23 760 765 20 16 99 101 90 92 E E 626 " Lot 24 767 19 100 91 E 627 Lot 25 768 20 101 92 E 6:? 8/23/78 Lot 72/Tr.34160 802 22 98 90 E 629 Lot 70 800 17 103 94 E Lot 13 FRG 12 101 92 E '630• 631** " Lot 7/slope 832 18 94 85 D 632 Lot 14 FRG 16 105 96 E 633 634 " Lot Lot 26 27 772 774 15 19 102 102 93 92 E E 635 Lot 28 773 16 101 92 E 636 Lot 18 775 16 102 93 E '637 Lot 19 780 25 106 97 E 638 Lot 72 785 15 .101 92 E 639 " Lot 73 787 16 101 92 - E Lot 26 774 20 103 93 ? .E '640 641 Lot 27 776 21: 104 94 E " 642 " Lot 28 775 17 101 92 E 643 Lot 68 804 20 100 91 E 644 Lot 69 806 20 101 92 E . 645 " Lot 70 " 806 .17 101 92 E 646 Lot 71 805 19 102 92 E t647 " Lot 72 804 20 102 93 E 648 " Lot 19 778 10 101 92 E 649 Lot 18 780 16 101 92 E 650 Lot 26 777 17 101 92 E 651 Lot 27 779 20 101 92 E *Retest #761 *Retest #743 IS. E. Madall & Associates, Inc. TABLE I ld. 0. 605D COMPACTION TEST RESULTS Dry Relative Test Date Test Loc./ Elev. Moisture Density Compaction Soil ' No. of Test 'Tract No. (Feet) (Z dry weight) (pcf.) (`/,) lyre 652 8/24/78 Lot 26/Tr34160 780 26 102 92 F 653. Lot 27 781 20 100 91 E 654 Lot 28 779 22 103 93.. E 655 " Running Branch" 782 21 99 90 E 656 Lot 18/Tr29053 782 19 100 91 E Lot 19 780 20 103 94 E '657 658 Lot 73/Tr34160 789 17 102 92 E 659 Lot 73 1,90 18 101 91 E 660 661 Lot Lot 23 22 767 762 20 21 102 103 93 93 E E 662 Lot 21 753 19 101 92 E 663 Lot 20 ", 743 21 102 93 E 1664 8/25/78 Lot 17/Tr34160 745 18 105 90 A 665 Lot 18 728 15 105 90 A 666 Lot 19 720 17. 106 91 A 1 667 Lot 12/Tr29053 718 17 103 93 E 668 Lot 13 720 18 103 94 E '669 670 Lot Lot 59/Tr34160 60 877 879 18 17 101 103 92 94 E E 671 Lot 61 880 18 103 93 E 672 Lot 62 880.. 16 `166 91 A '673 Lot 59 880 1.8 101 92. E 674 Lot 60 882 18 103 94 E 675 Lot 61 882 .17 102 93 E " Lot 18 820 12 105 93 C '676 677 Lot 13/Tr29053 745 19 102 93 E 678 ". Lot 20/Tr34160 747 20 101 92 E '679 680 Lot Lot 21 22 755 763 21 20 100 101 91 92 E E 681 Lot 20 748 21 101 92 E 682 Lot 21 757 20 100 -__91 '683 Lot 22 765 20 100 90 _-E 684 Lot 22 768 19 101 92 E 685 Lot 23 770 20 101 92 E '686 Lot 18 784 19 101 92 E 687 Lot 19 782 22 102 93 ".E '688 689 8/28/78 Lot Lot 59/Tr34160 60 882 884 15 17 100 102 91 93 E. E 690 Lot 61 885 19 101 92 E 691 Lot 62 884 20 101 92 E '692 Lot 60 886 18 101 92 E 693 Running Branch" 887 16 101 92 E 694 Lot 58 885 15 101. 92 E Lot 59 887 19 102 93 E '695 696 Lot 86 889 14 101 92 E 697 Lot 87 688 15 3.01 92 E S. E. ijledail 2c Associ�tes, Inc. TATTLE I COMPACTION TEST RESULTS W. 0.605D Dry Relative Date Test Loc./ Elev. Moisture Density Compaction Soil of Test Tract No. (Feet) (7 drytve.L-ht) (pcf) (`/>} Type 8/28/78 Running Branch/Tr34161 886 18 102 92 F " Running Branch 887 17 102 92 E " Lot 61 888 16 103 94 E " Lot 87 890 23 95 91 R Lot 58 893 22 104 93 C " Lot 86 890 15 90 86 E . ". Lot 85 890 17 93 90 E. " Lot 86 890 18 103 93 D ". Lot 57 888 21 100 92 E " Lot 58 894 18 104 93 C " Lot 59 895 22 101 92 E " Lot 60 889 19 100 91 D " Lot 61 890. 23 103 92 C " Lot 62 889 19. 104 .93 C 8/29/78 Lot 60/Tr34161 897 11 98 93 B " Lot 89 890 12 103 93 - E " Lot 56 900 18 96 91 B " Lot 88 992 15 104 93 C " Lot 43 824.. 15 85 81 B " Lot 41 640 15 95 84 C " Lot 71 W810 16 105 93 C " Lot 73/Tr34160 811 15 102 92 D " Lot 19/Tr29053 784 16 103 92 C " Lot 19 785 14 101 .91 E Lot 18 786 18. 101 91 E " Lot 18/Tr34161 '788 17 97 92 B " Lot 68 .812,: 14 .101 92 E " Lot 69 815 19 102 93 _. E " Lot 70 817 15 101 92., - E " Lot 71 818 20 99 .-90 Lot 72 818 16 101 92 E Lot 19/Tr29053 790 15 101 92 E " Lot 18 792 14 102 93 , F' Running Branch/Tr34160 795 17 101 92 E " Lot 13 ". 722 18 161 92 E ' Lot 12 724 18 102 92 E' " Lot 13 726 15 101 92 E " Lot 12 128 17 102 93 E *Retest #705 1 **Area reworked but not retested S. E. iNiad81i u AssoctJli!s, Inc. TABLE I W. 0. 605D COMPACTION TEST RESULTS Dry Relative Test Date Test Loc./ Elev. moisture Density Compaction Soil of Test Tract No. (Feet) (Z dry weight.) ( cp f) (7) Roe 1No. .736 8/30/78 Lot 28/Tr29053 800 12 95 91 B 737 Lot 70 820 18 100 - 91 E Lot 73 "- 790 14 105 94 C 1738 .739 Lot 73' 795 26 107 .95 - C 140 Lot 3 860 15 94 90 R 741* Lot 5 840 15 98 89 E '742 Lot 6 832 16 105 94 C 743 Lot 7 825 16 96 91 •B 744 Lot 28 .803 13 .95 90 B 745 ReLot 29 " 802 16 104 92 C 746 11Lot 69 820 15 118 93 E ' 747 21 Lot 70 823 17 103 92 C Lot 71 " 825 16 99 90 E i748 749 Lot 72 826 16 101 92 E 750 Lot 9 708 17 104 93 C 751 Lot 9 712. 16 105 93 C '752 Lot 8 708 14 100 91 E 753 Lot 12 730 16 102 93 E 754 Lot 13 732 13 102 91 C '755 Lot 8 712 14 103 92 C 756 Lot 9 714 13 101 92 E 757 Lot 9 717 14 -05 94 C 758 Lot 12 732 13 102 93 E 759 Lot 12 734 13 103 92 C 760 8/31/78. Lot 3/Tr29053 857 .12 100 91 E '761 Lot 4 11845 16 99 90 E 762** ". Lot 8 815 18 93 84 E 763 Lot 9 810 18 106 95 C '764 Re Lot 8 711 18 98 90 C 765 Lot 7 710 16 i02 -92 D 766 Lot 8 714 14 100 -91 _E 76.7 Lot 9 716 16 106 -91 - _yE:; 768 Lot 8 720 14 104 93 C' 769' Lot 12 Re734 16 102 93 D 770- Lot 13• 736 14 101 92 E 771 Lot 18 794 12 100 91 F 772 Lot 19 796 16 101 92 E 773 Lot 18 798 17 103 93 E ' '774 Lot 19 800 15 101 92 1; 775 Lot 1 665 15 102 92 E 776 Lot 2 668 14 101 92 E 777 Lot 3 " 675 15 102 92 E 778 Lot 4 685 .17 103 94 E 779 Lot 5 710 16 101 92 E 780 Lot 6 717 17 101 92 E 781 Lot 7 715 16 102 93 E 782 Lot 8 Re717 18 101 92 E *Retest #1884 ' **Retest #1886 S. E. Madall & AssociB2ss, Inc. I 1 1 1 11 1 II i 11 I TABLE I W- 0. 605D COMPACTION TEST RESULTS Dry Relative Test Date Elev. Moisture Density Compaction Soil No. of Test Test Location (feet) (% dry weight) (pcE) (7) Type 783 9/l/78 Lot 12/Tr29053 738 13 101 92 E 784 Lot 13 740 15 102 91 C 785 Lot 14 750 20 100 91 E 786 Lot 15 760 16 101 92 E 787 Lot 16 770 15 98 93 B 788 Lot 17 780 15 102 92 E. 789 Lot 12 742 16 101 92 E 790 Lot 13 744 17 102 92 E 791 Lot 14 754 16 103 94 E 792 Lot 15 765 13 100 91 E 793 Lot 16 775 14 102 92 E 794 Lot 17 785 14 102 92 E 795 9/5/78 Lot 14/Tr29053 757 13 100 90 E 796 Lot 15 768 18 102 92 E 797 Lot 16 779 19 101 92 E 798 Lot 17 788 17 102 93 E 799 " Lot 18 797 17 101 92 E 800 Lot 19 7.99 15 101 92 E 801 Lot 14 761 16 103 92 C 302... Lot 15 773 19 103 91 C 803 Lot 16 783 15 100 91 E 804 Lot 17 :792 14 100 91 E 805 Lot 2 673 15 101 92 E 806 Lot 4 690 19 101 92 E 807 Lot 6 '721 19 102 91 C 808 Lot 8 ,722 16 101 92 E 809 Lot 1 11670 17 102 93 E 810 Lot 3 :680 15 101 92 E 811 Lot 5 ,716 15 102 92 E 812 Lot 7 720 18 101 92 E 813 Lot 12 �748 15 101 92 _. E 814 Lot 13 750 14 100 91 E 815 Lot 14' 765 19 102 92 E ` 816 Lot 15 777 17 101 92 E . 817 Lot 16 786 16 101 92 E 818 Lot 17 7.95 15 101 92 E 819 9/11/78 Lot 12/Tr29053 750 18 101 92 E 820 Lot 13 753 15 101 92 E 821 Lot 14 767 19 101 92 E 322 Lot 15 779 19 102 92 E 323 Lot 8 725 15 102 91 E 824 Lot 9 720 15 100 92 E 826 Lot 3 685 16 101 92 E 827 Lot 4 693 15 101 92 E 828 Lot 5 .718 14 100 93 E ' S. E. PAPdall & Associa?es, Inc. TABLE I W. 0. 605D COMPACT:CON TEST R13SL'LTS Dry Relative Test Date Test Loc./ Elev. Moisture Density Compaction Soil ' No. of Test Tract No. — (Feet) (`/, dr}• we:i.,t (pcf) m Type 829 9/11/78 Lot 6/Tr34161 726 16 103 93 E' 830 Lot 7 728 15 102 92 E '831* Lot 44 816 23 94 86: E .832** Lot 40 FRG 14 95 86 E 833*** Lot 41 FRG 19 93 85 E 834 Lot 44 FRG 21 102 92 E 1 835 Lot 43 " FRG 16 101 92 E 836 Lot 40 FRG .18 101 91 F. 837 838 Lot Lot 41 42 ". FRG FRG 20 19 103 100 93 91 F E 839 9/12/78 Lot 14/Tr34161 441 17 100 91 E '.840 Lot 15 803 17 101 92 E . 841 Lot 16 812 15. 101 92 E 842 Lot 13 756 16 102 92 E Lot 14 755 16 101 .91 E '843 844 Lot 15 805 18 101 91 E 845 Lot .8 748 16 101. 92 E 846 847 Lot Lot 9 10 730 855 18 16 101 102 91. 92. E E 848 Lot 14 760 15 103 93 E 849 Lot 15 795, 18 102 92 E 850 Lot 16 795 18 102 93 E 851 Lot 38 FRG 21 99 90 E 852 Lot 36 " FRG 23 103 93 E Lot 37 FRG 14 104 92 C '853 854 Lot 35 FRG 18 103 92 C 855 Lot 14 FRG 14 103 93 F. 856 Lot 14 780 16 100 91 E 857 Lot 15 776 16 103 92 C 858. Lot 17 755 19 103 93 E 859 Lot 18 738 14 100 90 "- E 860 Lot 19 730 17 103. _ 861 Lot 16 721 16 104 92 C 862 Lot 19 724 16 100 91 E 863 Lot 14 784 15 104 90 G 864 Lot 16 750 16 101 91 C 865 Lot 18 " 725 15 103 92 C Lot 19 ". 755 12 92 E ' .866 867 Lot 17 780 14 .102 104 92 C 868 Lot 15 765 14 102 91 C 869 Lot 14 765 13 100 90 E 870 Lot 17 774 15 101 91 E 871 Lot 17 779 18 103 92, C 872 Lot 19 765 16 103 91 C * Retest #881 ** Retest #1836 1 *** Retest #837 S. EH. PA9daiI a Associai>s, Inc. ' -TABLE I "- 0• 605D COMPACTION TEST RESULTS ' Dry Relative Test Date Test Loc./ Elev. Moisture Density Compaction Soil No. of Test Tract No. (Feet) (% dry weicht) ( cp f) (�) Type ' I ,873 9/13/78 Lot 70/Tr34160 851 20 100 90 E 874 875 11Lot'72 11Lot 34 11830 " FRG 15 18 100 105 90 94:- E C 876* 11Lot 30 815 12 99 85- H 877 11Lot 30R 815 20 102 93 E 878 Lot 32 817 14 106 95 C 879 Lot 33 815 13 103. 93 E 880 Lot 34 812 18 106 94 C 881 Lot 44 833 13 103 93 E 882 " Lot 43 832 13 101 92 E 883 Lot 42 830 13 102 91 C Lot 41 839 13 103 92 C '884 885 if Lot 40 " 845 14 101 92 E 886 Lot 45 86l 15. 102 93 E 9/14/78 Lot 14/Tr34160 770 15 101 91 C '887 888 of Lot 16 " 752 16 102 91 C 889 if Lot 15 11767 18 100 91 E Lot 17 PRG 19 100 91 E '890 891 Lot 19 718 18 100 91 F. 892 Lot 18 747 20 101 91 E 893 to Lot 3.6 FRG. 16 100 91 E 894 It Lot 15 HFRG 18 100 91 E 895 Lot 14 11 776 16 102 91 C . 896 Lot 18 728 16 103 92 C Lot 18 FRG 16 101 92 E '897 898 Lot 19 FRG 15 101 92 E 899 Lot 43/Tr34161 FRG 18 102 92 E 900 Lot 44. FRG i 17 103 92 E 901 9/15/78 Lot 17/Tr34160 770 15 '101 92 E " Lot 17 11 785 13 99 -. 90 E '902 903 Lot 41 FRG 14 101 --92 �_. -:E :. 904 Lot 13 k'RG 20 109 97 C ` 905 Lot 3.4 if FRG 20 110. 98 C Lot 15 FRG 21 107 95 C '906 907 Lot 18 FRG 15 104 93 C 908 Lot 19 " FRG 15 102 91 C '909 910 Lot Lot 92/Tr29053 92 " 760 764 16 16 101 102 91 91 E C. 911 Lot 42 " 790 18 102 91 C 912 Lot 42 it 792 18 102 93 E' ' I *Retest #877 ; 1 ' $. i`�9BC�clli t°; .^1SSC)C1c1i85�i7�. TABLE I COMPACTION TEST RESULTS W- 0. 605D Dry Relative Test Date Elev. Moisture Density Compaction Soil No. of Test Test Location (feet) '(% dry wei ht) (pcf) (%) Type 913 9/18/78 Lot 42/Tr29053 760 20 101 91 E 914 Lot 41 760 13 100 91 E 915 Lot 42 762 14 100 91 E 916 Lot 68 " 762 15 101 92 E. 917 Lot 68 764 15 104 93 C 918 Lot 70 764 14 101 92 E 919 Lot 68 766 14 101 92 E 920 Lot 69 768 15 102 93 E 921 Lot 70 770 18 99 90 E 922 Lot 68 " 770 15 102 93 E 923 9/19/78 Lot 43/Tr29053 772 18 94 90 B 924 Lot 41 772 18 96 91' B 925 Lot 68 774 20 103 94 E 926 Lot 69 774 20 103 94 E 927 Lot 71 776 19 105 95 E 928 Lot 70 776 12 96 91 B 929 Lot 68 778 13 95 90 B 930 Lot 69 778 14 95 91 B 931 Lot 70 780 15 101 92 E 9.32 Lot 42 780 18 101 92 E 933 9/20/78 Lot 74/Tr29053 760 14 100 92 E 934 Lot 71 If 758 15 103 93 E 935 Lot 45 762 13 103 92 C 936 Lot 87 762. 19 101 92 E 937 Lot 68 766 18 96 92 B 938 " Lot 85' 767 21 104 95 E 939 Lot 86 769 18 101 92 E 940 Lot 85 769 18 101 91 E 941 " Lot 87 " 771 16 101 92 E 942 Lot 72 7.71 18 101 "92 943 9/21/78 Lot 72/Tr29053i 773 18 .101 93 E 944 Lot 74 774 19 100 91 E 945 Lot 73 ' 775 18 101 92 E 946 " Lot 70 776 19 103 93 E 947 Lot 86 777 19 103 92 E 948 Lot 44 773 15 103 92 C 949 Lot 43 " 774 14 103 92 E 950 Lot 42 775 15 103 91 C 951 Lot 41 776 15 103 92 C 952 Lot 68 " 777 16 102 91 C 953 Lot 69 778 18 101 90 C 954 Lot 71 780 18 101 92 E 955 " Lot 72 " 780 18 101 91 E S. E. i'Jledall & Asso.ciates, Inc. TABLE I W. 0. 605D COMPACTION TEST RESULTS ■ + Dry Relative Test Date Test Loc./ Elev. Moisture Density Compaction Soil .No. of :test Tract No. (Feet) (% dry we-i bt) (pci) (`/,) TypE 956 9/22/78 Lot 41/Tr29053 782 20 108 92 A 957 Lot.42 1.783 20 105 90 A Lot 44 784 19 103 92 C . '958 959 it Lot 45 " .785 20 104 93- C '-960 Lot 69 780 22 104 93 C 961 962 Lot Lot 70 72 To 783 785 23 20 102 105 92- 90 E A 963 Lot 98 "' 659 20 101 92 E 964 Lot 99 661 18 104 93 C 965 toLot 101 1.663 18 105 90 A 966 9/25/78 Lot 26/Tr34160 790 13 99 _ 90 C 11Lot 27 IT795 14 98 90 C '967 968 Lot 28 860 14 99 90 C 969 Lot 25 805 16 98 90 C 970 Lot 24 800 16 95 90 A 971* 9/26/78 Lot 23/Tr34161 '780 17 85 80 E " Lot 23 780 16 94 90 E '-971A 9.72 " Lot 22 785 21 97 91 A 973 " Lot 23 770 21 95 90 S 974 " Lot 21 758 19 -:100 91 C Lot 26/Tr34160 765 18 95 90 E '975 976 Lot 28 760 18 96 90 E ' 977 978 9/27/78 " Lot Lot 89/Tr29053 90 1.700 698 23 19 98 101 90 93 C C 979 " Lot 90 700 22 99 91 C 980 Lot 96 "• 702 25 99 91 C 981 " Lot 96 702 15 104 90 G 982 Lot 91 704 18 102 92 E 983 Lot 91 " 704 15 101 92 — E 984 Lot 91 ,705 15 107 '._93 G,- ' 985 Lot 91 :705 16 105 91 "f 986, ITLot 95 706 23 101. 92 E 98-7 988 Lot Lot 95 95 706 706 19 11 104 107 90 92 G 989 Lot 95 "' 708 18 102 92 E Lot 94 4708 18 102 92 E '990 991 Lot 94 IT710 20 103 94 . E.' 992 Lot 92 1,710 16 103 93 E 993 Lot 92 if 712 23 161 92 E 994 Lot 93 It 712 19 100 90 E 995 Lot 93 H714 20 100 90 E 996 Lot 87 " 714 14 99 90 E '997 998 Lot Lot 98 98 675 716 19 15 100 98 91 91 E E 999 Lot 98 686 17 101 92 E 1000 Lot 97 718 13 104 94 E ' *Retest 971A ' S. E. Medan u Associales, Inc. TAK.I:. I 14- 0. 605D COMPACTION TEST RESULTS Dry Relative Test Date Test Loc./ Elev. Moisture Density Compaction Soil No. of Test Tract No. (Feet) (`/, dry xae.L-_ht) (pcf) (7) Type 1001 9/20/78 Lot 96/Tr29053 720 21 100 90 E 1002 Lot:89 720 18 99 90 E Lot 90' 722 21 100 91 E 11003 .1004 Lot 94 722 19 102 93 E 1005 Lot 92 724 16 104 91 G 1006 1007 Lot Lot 99 99 706 726 21 .18 102 101 93 91 E E _ 1008 Lot 98 728 21 103 93 E 1009 Lot 99 726 17 ill 96 G ' 1010 Lot 97 730 15 ill 96 G 1011 9/28/78 Lot 1/Tr29053 877, 19 101 92 E 1012 Lot 1 878 23 103 93 E 1013 Lot 1 877 21 107 92 G 1014 Lot 1 874 16 107 93 G 1015 1016 Lot 1 Buttress "., 876 14 102 92 E Lot 1 877 23 106 92 G 1017 Lot 96 725 17 99 90 E 1018 Lot 93 725. 18 106 92 G 1019 Lot 91 727 18 105 91 G 1020 Lot 89 727 20 -'in 92 E Lot, 96 7.29 16 98 90 F '1021 1022 Lot 94 729 21 97 90 F 1023 Lot 90 7,31 19 101 92 E 1024 1025 " Lot Lot 90 96 " 7;31 733 15 15 101 102 92 92 E E 1026 Lot 95 733 14 102 93 E 1027 Lot 91. 735. 20 100 91 E 1028 Lot 96 735 13 .100 91 E 1029 Lot 93 737 13 98 91 F 1030 " Lot 90 " 737 16 99 90 -E _,F. F1031 9/29/78 Lot 98/Tr29053 755 21 102 93 ..... 1032 Lot 86 800 17 106 '1033 1034 Lot Lot 85 87 7,80 785 18 21 101 98 92 90 E 'F 1035 Lot 85 755 11 104 91 G 1036 Lot 72/Tr34.160 832 15 99 90 C 1037 Lot 72 829 14 103 90 G 1038 Lot 71 844 21 .103 90 G 1039 Lot 71 840 19 106 92 G 1040 Lot 70 835 .23 100 91 E 1 S.E. Nledail Et Associates, Inc. TABLE I W- 0. 605n COMPACTION TEST RESULTS Dry Relative Test Date Test Loc./ Elev. Moisture Density Compaction Soil No. of Test' Tract No. (Feet) (/, dry weight) (pcf) M Type _ 1041 9/29/78 Lot 70/Tr34160 835 20 99 90 E 1042 Lot 69 849 15 106 91 G 1 1043 Lot 69 8'46 19 103 90 G 1044 Lot 68 633 18 105 91 G 1045 Lot 68 823 18 105 91 G '1046 Lot 67 838 20 104 90 G 1047 Lot 67 867 9 104 90 G . 1048 Lot 99/Tr29053 722 14 102 92 E Lot 99/Tr34i60 722. 14 114 93 C '1049 1050 Lot 99 91724 12 103 93 E 1051 Lot 99/Tr29053 724 11 103 94 E 1052 Lot 86 726 12 104 94 C 1053 Lot 100 726 13 105 .93 C 1054 Lot 99 726 15 104 94 E .. 1055 Lot 100 726 14 104 94 E '1056 Lot 86 726 12 104 93 C 1057 Lot 99 726 11 103 94 E 10/2/78 Lot 53/Tr34161 874 18 103 94 C '1058 . 1059 Lot 53 849 16 104 90 G 1060 Lot 52 854 16 106 92 G 1061 Lot 52 857 16 ='105 91 G '1062 Lot 51 858 8 102 93 C 1063 Lot 51 860 18 100 .92 C 1064 Lot 50 863 12 98 90 C 1065 Lot 50 861 13 99 91 C 1066 Lot 49 863 15 97 91 A 1067 Lot 49 862 15 105 91 G Lot 98/Tr29053 686 20 99 90 E. I1068 1069 Lot 98 704 23 103 94 E 1070 Lot 87 695 17 100 91 E 1071 1072 Lot Lot 87 97 760 715 23 20 99 99 90 9-0`"_ " E . iEt•.. 1073 Lot 95 734 19 101 - 92 "19 . 1074 Lot 90 " 785 21 100 91 E '1075 Lot 97 735 21 100 91 E 1076 Lot 48/Tr34161 860 18 98 90 C 1077 Lot 48 " 851 17 103 94 C Lot 89/Tr29053 792 12 110 95 G . '1:078 1079 Lot 97 696 10 104 94 E 1080 Lot 98 686 14 105 91 G 1081 Lot 99 685 14 105 90 G 1082 " Lot 99 715 12 103 93 F. 1083 Lot 100 675 13 108 94 G 1084 No Test S. E. ;';'leC1£3i1 2t ASSOC iaties, tau:. TABLE I COi4PACTION TEST RESULTS 14. 0' 605D Dry Relative Date Test Loc./ Elev. Moisture Density Compaction Soil of .Test Tract No. (Feet) (`/> dry weight) (I>cf) (%) Type 10/3/78 Lot 63/Tr34160 .886 25 91 87Nat. E " Lot:75 855. 12 101 92 C " Lot 76 855 12 105 92 .- G. " Lot 76 858 14 109 95 G " Lot 77 868 15 96 90 A " Lot 77 861 6 108 93 G " Lot 78 861 6 99 91 C Lot 78. 8'62 6 102 94 C " Lot 79 864 9 ill 96 G " Lot 79 867 13 107 92 G " Lot 80 867 14 100 91 C " Lot 81 8.73 16 108 94 G " Lot 66 8'69 14 105 91 G " Lot 65 873 13 97 91 A " Lot 87/Tr29053 682. 22 102 93 E Lot 96 735 18 104 94 E " Lot 94 753 20 105 95 E " Lot 93 771 21 96 91 A " Lot 98 725 21 100 91 E 10/4/78 Lot 86/Tr29053 748 23 101 92 E " Lot 98 748.. 21. "100 91 E " Lot 86 750 18 105 92 G Lot 98 750 17 101 91 E " Lot 85/Tr34160 752 20 97 90 F Lot 88/Tr29053 782 10 103 90 G " Lot 86 11 754 19 99 91 C Lot 87 754 17 96 90 A " Lot 85. 756 18 96 90 A " Lot .88 756' . 21 ..104 .95 E " . Lot 85 760 18 102 . 92 _E " Lot 86 160 19 98 -•91.,.,, E " Lot 88 762 22 100 91 •� �,-:-:, , " Lot 86 762 16 104 91 G " Lot 86 •758 20 104' 95 E " Lot 88 758 21 105 95' E " Lot ,87 764 23 103 93 E " Lot 85 " 76416 97 90F " Lot 88 766 23 97 90 F " Lot 86 766 19 104 94 E. S. E. Medall 8 Associales, Inc. 1 . ' TAELE I W• 0• 605D COMPACTION TEST F.ESnTS Dry Relative Test Date Test Loc./ Elev. Moisture Density Compaction Soil No. of Test Tract No. (Feet) (``% dry} weight) (pcf) (%) - Type 1124 10/5/78 Lot 65/Tr34160 872 15 105 91 G 1125 Lot .64 819 14 104 91 G Lot 64 879 16 105 92 G '1126 1127 Lot 66 867 16 103 94 E '1128 Lot 63 884 18 105 91 -G ' 1129 1130 Lot Lot 84/Tr29053 87 770 77O 18 18. 105 104 91 91 G G 1131 Lot 88 772 15 105 91 G 1132 Lot 85 772 15 104 90 G '1133 Lot 87 774 22 102 93 E 1134 Lot 85 774 18 104 94 E 1135 Lot 86 776 20 97 91 A Lot 87 776 21 107 97 E '1136 1137 Lot 84 ". 778 18 99 90 E 1138 Lot 85 778 21 102 93 E 1139 1140 Lot Lot 86 87 780 780 19 21 103 102 94 93 E E 1141 Lot 85 782 20 101 92 E 1142 Lot 87 782 24 99 91 F 1 1143 10/6/78 Lot 86/Tr29053 784 12 106 96 E 1144 Lot 87 774 13 -107 97 E. 1145 Lot 88 7;74 15 106 96 F. 1146 Lot 84 776 12 106 96 E 1147 Lot 86 776 12 106 96 E 1 1148 1149 Lot Lot 87 88 776 776 14 14 104 106 95 94 E C 1150 " Lot 86 778 15 108 95 C 1151 Lot 87 778 16 107 95 C 1152 Lot 88 " 776 16 106 95 C 1153 Lot 85 778 16 106 96 C 1154 Lot 84 778 18 106 -93 _C 1155 Lot 88 778 14 107 95 , �. :_ C:;; . 1156 Lot 86 778 14 106 94 1157 Lot 84 780 16 103 93 E 1158 1159 Lot Lot 84 85 780 782 14 16 104 102 94 92 E . sE 1160 Lot 86 7'82 14 104 94 E 1161 Lot 85 7.84 18 105 95 E 1.162 Lot 85 784 17 106 96 t 1163 Lot 84 786 18 100 .91 E 1164 " Lo't 85 786 17 101 92 F. ' 1165 Lot 87 " 786 22 102 92 E 1 . . $, ._• �'i)YOifi{ i'.c i.SSOC1718 �� I��i. I TABLE I COPfPACTION TEST RESULTS W. 0• 605D ■ Dry Relative Test Date Test Loc./ Elev. Moisture Density Compaction Soil 'No. _ of Test Tract No. (Feet) weight) (% dry wei<� ) 0 !cf (�) (/) Tyne 1.166 10/6/78 Lot 86/Tr29053 786 19 98 91 F 1167 Lot 84 788 22 99 90 E '1168 Lot 85 788 14 101 91 : E 1169 Lot 86 788 20 97 91 A 1170 Lot 86 788 22 101 92 E 1171 Lot 84 790 .19 103 94 E 1172 Lot 85 790 15 101 92 E 1173 Lot 87 790 19 98 91 F ' 1174 10/7/78 '"Lot 74/Tr34160 8.48 11 105 92 G 1175 Lot 74 851 16 106 90 G 1176 Lot 80 00 14 109 95 G' '1177 Lot 81 8)3 13 109 94 G 1178 Lot 99 707 18 104 95 E 1179 Lot 99 707 19 102. 92 E Lot 87/Tr29053 753 18 105 92 G '1180 1181 Lot 87 753 26 100 E 1182 Lot 88 758 14 .104 191 93 C Lot 89 758 15 105 94 C. '1183 1184 Lot 87 760 18 99 90 E 1185 Lot 87 760 22 102 93 E 1186 Lot 82/Tr34160 878 13 105 92 G 1187 Lot 82 " 877 14 106 93 G 1188 Lot 83 882 15 105 91 G 1189 Lot 83 882 16 105 91 G 1190 Lot 95/Tr29053 737 14 106 92 G 1191 .Lot 95 740 16 106 91 G 1192 Lot 95 744 15 103 91 G Lot 95 748 16 106 92 G '1193. 1194 Lot 95 752 18 105 91 G 1195 Lot 95 756 20 102 93 E '1196 10/9/78 Lot 94/Tr29053 768 16 106 92 1197 Lot 94 790 16 101. 91 E " 1198 Lot 37 786 16 102 93 E 1199 Lot 38 786 18 99 90 E 0 u 1 S. E. M', da)I a A,soC aS, InC. .1 TABLE I W. 0. 605D CORPACTION TEST RESULTS Dry Relative Test Date. Elev. Moisture Density Compaction Soil No. of Test Test Location (feet) (`/, dry weigh) (pcf) (%) Type. 1200 10/9/78 Lot 44/Tr29053 810 18 103 94 E 1201 Lot 45 11 817 20 103 93 E 1202 " Lot 46 322 15 104 91 G 1203 Lot 40 780 19 107 95 C 1204 Lot 39 778 14 99 91 C-1 1205 " Lot 35 " 782 18 102 93 E 1206 Lot 36 782 18 103 93 E 1207 Lot 37 774 14 105 92 G 1208 Lot 38 788 16 100 91 E. 1209 Lot 39 780 16 102 91 C 1210 Lot 40 780 18 98 90 C 1211 Lot 44. 812 17 104 93 C-1 1212 Lot 96 761 19 103 92 C-1 1213 Lot 89 765 11 106 94 C-1 121.4 Lot 36 780 13 105. 91 G 1215 Lot 36 " 780 13 104 91 G 1216 IT Lot 88 790 12 104 90 G 1217 Lot 87 790 13 101 90 C-1 1218 Lot 86 800 12 105 91 G 1219 IT Lot 85 " 800 14 103 91 C-1 1220 Lot 84 818 14 102 91 C-1 1221 Lot 4 FRG 14 98 91 F 1222 " Lot 4 720 15 98 91 F 1223 Lot 4 " 118 12 103 93 E 1224 Lot 7 744 18 95 90 A 1225 Lot 8 754 20 94 92 H 1226 Lot 9 764 15 104 94 E 1227 Lot 11 " 773 15 100 91 E 1228 10/10/78 Key Lot 35 . Tract 29053 775 16 99 91 C` 1229 Key Lot 35 790 13 108 93 G 1230 .Key Lot 35 785 11 109 95`" `° G- ... 1231 Key Lot .35 790 15 99 91 C 1232 Key Lot 35'." 795 12, 106 92 G . 1233 Key Lot 35 " 772 12 109 95 G 1234 Lot 88• 785 10 107, 93 G 1235 Lot 87 790 10 109 95 G 1236 Lot 86 797 15 108 93 G 1237 Lot 8_5 805 16 103 95' C 1238 Lot 84 ". 813 14 102 93 C 1239 Lot 83 821 10 107 93 G- 1240 Lot 82 E" 828 7. 99 91 C 1241 Lot 81 833 12 100 91 C 1242 Lot.80 836 11 101 92 C 1243 Lot 79 838 14 100 95 G 3.244 Lot 78 837 10 108 94 G ' S. E. ?ae ia11t S��soci<ita I ' I ' TABLE I W. 0. 605D COMPACTION TEST RESULTS Dry Relative Test Date Test Loc./ Elev. Moisture Density Compaction Soil of, Test Tract No. (I_eet) (7 dry weight) (pcf) (7) Tempe 'No. 1245 10/10/78 Lot 77/Tr29053 835 13 107 93 G 1246 Lot 76 832 14 102 93 C Lot 76 834 15 100 91 C '1247 1248 Lot 88 193 11 108 94 G 1249 Lot 87 198 14 105 91 G 1250 Lot 86 804 7 109 94 G 1 1251 Lot 85 812 12 107 93 G 1252 Lot 84 820 18 108 94 G 1253 Lot 83 828 12 108 94 G '1254 Lot 83 829 20 98 90 F 1255 Lot 82 834 12 104 93 C-1 1256 Lot 82 836 17 ill 96 G ' 1257 10/11/78 Lot 81/Tr29053 840 12 105 91 G 1258 Lot 81 841 12 108 93 G Lot 80 843 11 101 93 C '1259 1260 Lot 80 844 12 105 91 G 1261 Lot 79 845 12 105 91 G 1262 Lot 79 846 16 .107 93 G 1263 Lot 78 844 12 108 94 G 1264 - Lot 78 847 15 107 93 G 1265 Lot 77 k 2 12 104 92 C-1 Lot 77 845 14 105 92 G '1266 1267 Lot 76 838 15 105 92 G 1268 10/12/78 Lot 75/Tr29053 i 827 14 98 90 C 1269 Lot 75 829 20 104 95 C 1270, Lot 74 814 16 102 93 C 1271 Lot 74 815 10 98 90 C '1272 Lot 73 806 10 99 90 C 1273 Lot 73 807 12 103 94 C 1274 Lot 64 827 15 105 90 --G Lot 64 829 12 106 92 ;C_ '1275 1276 Lot 65 828 16 104 90 G 1277 Lot 65 828 19 99 91 F Lot 66 827 12 103 94 C '1278 1279 Lot 66 828 19 102 93 "C 1280 Lot 67 826 9 104 90 G 1281 Lot 67 827 12 106 .92 G '1282 Lot 72 7,90 8 101 92 C . 1283 Lot 72 789 12 .102 93 C-1 1284 Lot 71 792 10 100 92 C 1285 Lot 71 791 12 105 91 G. 1 i , AssoClaiaa, Inc. I ' TABLE I W. 0.605D COMPACTION TEST RESULTS ' Dry Relative Test Date, Elev. Moisture Density Compaction Soil • 'No. of Test Test Location (feet) (% dry weight) _(pcf) (7) Type 1286 10/12/78 Lot 70/Tr29053 798 13 103 92 C 1287 Lot 70 " . 797 9 103 94 C-1. Lot 98 116 16 93 88 A '1288 1289 Lot 98 120 15 96 89 C-1 1290 Lot 98 718 15 96 91 A Lot 99 700 15 91 87 A '1291 1292 Lot 98 700 16 91 87 A 1293 Lot 100 ". 694 17 94 88 A 1294 Lot 98 693 23 113 98 G 1295 " Lot 99 680 10 86 83 A' 1296 Lot 98 716 18 99 90 E 1297 Lot 98 720 20 103 92 C Lot 99 700 16 102 91 C '1298 1299 Lot 98 700 18 108 94 G 1300 Lot-100 694 15 97 92 A 1301 Lot 98 693 19 99 90 E 1302 Lot 99 680 19 104 90 G 1303 Lot 69 " 804 17 98 90 F 10/13/78 Lot 69/Tr29053 i 805 18 102 91 C '1304 .1305 11 Lot 68 806 12 99 90 C 1306 Lot 68 809 12 100 91 C Lot 41 807 13 105 91 G '1307 1308 Lot 41 786 12 100 90 E .1309 Lot 42 790 20 102 90 C Lot 42 792 13 103 90 G '1310 1311 Lot 43 "' 792 17 103 92 C 1312 Lot 43 797 14 105 91. G 1313 Lot 44 795 14• 110 95 G. .1314 Lot 44 " 804 12 101 93 F 1315 Lot 45 804 15 104 90 G 1316 Lot 45 810 17 104 93 _. C-1 1317 Lot 63 810 14 304 -92 C-1. '. 1318 Lot 63 $22 13 100 92 C 1319 Lot 63 825 16 102 91 C 1320 Lot 63 13 99 90 E ' 1321 Lot 62 16 99 90' E 1 1322 10/14/78 Lot 62/Tr29053 .817 17 105 94 C-1 1323 Lot 62 817 16 102 91 C-1 1324 Lot 61 843 13 105 93 C-1 1325 Lot 60 " 843 19 104 92 C-1 1326 Lot 60 845 12 102 90 C-1 1327 Lot 46 8.45 17 104 90 G 1328 Lot 46 823 16 103 92 C 1329 Lot 47 825 16 103 91 C S. E. Madill A, Associales, Inc. i ' TABLE: I W. 0. 605D COMiPACTI6N TEST RESULTS Dry Dry Relative Test Date Test LOC./ Elev. Moisture Compaction Soil . tNo. of: Test Tract'No. (Feet) (`/> dry weight) (pcf) (%) Type 1330 10/14/78 Lot 47/Tr29053 823 12 106 91 G 1331 Lot 67 of 825 11 106 .92 G '1332 Lot 69 825 12 103 92 C .1333 " Lot 68 814 15 103 91 C 1334 Lot 68 809 15 104 92 C ' 1335 10/16/78 Lot 40/Tr29053 787 11. 100 91 C-1 1336 Lot 40 " 787 10 99 90 C-1 1337 Lot 40 789 14 102 90 C ' 1338 Lot 40 789 22 95 90 A 1339 Lot 43 817 14 98 90 C-1 1340 Lot 44 817 12 99 90 (j-1 '1341 Lot 45 817 12 99 90 C-1 1342 Lot 45 817 13 101 92 C-1 1343 Lot 73/Tr34160 855 14 102 90 C Lot 74 858 14 103 92 C '1344 1345 Lot 75 8:62 14 98 90 C-1 1346 Lot 76 864 15 103 92 C ' 1347 1348 Lot Lot 81 82 892 898 15 14 103 102 91 91 C C . 1349 Lot 83 903 19 102 92 E 1350 Lot 73 865, 12 107 92 G '1351 Lot 74 865 15 103. 91 C 1352 Lot 75 865 12 102 90 C 1353 Lot 76 870 12 102 90 C Lot 83 903 14 102 91 C '1354 1355 Lot 48/Tr29053 840 19 100 90 E 1356 Lot 48 840 18 99 90 E ' 1357 1358 Lot Lot 61 60 8.41 842 15 20 98 .103 90 91 C-1 C 1359 _ Lot 57 841 16 97 91 A 1360 Lot 57 841 10 103 ,91 "C ' 1361 Lot 58 " 842 14 103 '91 ""•a: K=C:.�.:.., 1362 Lot 58 841 18 98 90 F 1 1 S. Nledi1)l c:1:)SoClellies, 37)C. Test No. ' 1,363 1364 1365 1366 1367 '1368 1369 1370 1371 '1372 1373 1374 1375 1376 1377 1378 1379 1380 1381 1382 1383 1384 1385 1386 1387 1388 1389 1390, '1391 1392 1393 1394 1395 1396 '1397 1398 1399 1400 ' 1401 1 Date of Test 10/17/78 TABLE I COMPACTION TEST RESULTS 14' 0' 605D Dry Test Loc./ Elev. Moisture Density Tract No. (Feet) (`/, dry weight) (pcf) Lot 73/Tr34160 875 13 103 Lot .74 875 17 105 Lot .75 - 875 12 99 Lot 76 875 15 108 Lot 81 895 9 102 Lot 82 903 18 100 Lot 83 907 12 100 Lot 64/Tr29053 828 10 100 Lot 60 828 18 106 Lot 69 828 12 109 Lot 64 830 12 103 Lot 64 830 16 102' Lot 63 8'30 .19 101 Lot 63 830 18 101 Lot 63 8`30 15 101 Lot 59 8'30 1-5 100 Lot 64 830 20 101 Lot 63 830 14 100 Lot 63 830 16 102 Lot 59 8:30 19 101 Lot 59 843 16 97 Lot 58 844 15 '`98 Lot 59 846 17 98 Lot 59 846 15 104 . Lot 58 845 14 97 . Relative Compaction Soil (7) Type 91 C 94 C 90 C 93 G 91 C-1 90 E 91 C-1 91 C-1 94 C 94 G 92 G 90 G 91 E 91 F. 91 E 91 E 91 E 92 C-1 93 C-1 92 E 91 A 92 A 92 A 92 C 91 A 10/18/78 Lot 64/Tr29053 833 13 102 91 C " Lot 64 833 13 104 92 C " Lot 64. 833 16 98 90 F " Lot 63 833 15 99 90 C-1 " Lot 63 833 14 102 .90 C " Lot 63 833 16 102 90 -:C " Lot 63 833 17 106 94 Lot 63 833 19 102 91 C. " Lot 63 633 18 102 91 C " Lot 59 633 20 103 91 C " Lot 64 836 16 101 92 iC " 'Lot 64 ". 836 18 101 91 C " Lot 64 836 17 102 91 C " Lot 63 836 19 100 90 E 1 S. E. Medail 2, Associates, Inc. TABLE I COMPACTION TEST RESULTS W. 0.605D Dry Relative Date Test Loc./ Elev. Moisture Density Compaction Soil of Test Tract No. (Feet) (`/, dr - weight) Ocf) (`/,) lype 10/18/78. Lot 63/Tr29053 836 21 100 90 E " Lot 63 836 19 101 91 E " Lot 63 836 13 104 90 .. G " Lot 63 836 13 103 94 C " Lot 64 836 19 102 92 E Lot 63 836 .17 102 92 E " Lot 60 838 16 97 91 A " Lot 59. 838 14 101 91 'E. " Calm Brook 838 17 96 90 A " -Lot 59 •838 13 101 91 E " Lot 64 838 14 98 90 F 10/19/78 Lot 64/Tr29053 840 19 101 91 E " Lot 64 8.40 14 100 91 C " Lot 64 840 14 104 90 G " Lot 63 " 8'40 14 101 90 C-1 " Lot 63 842 18 103 91 C-1 " Lot 63 842 19 101 91 E " Lot 63 842 18, - 99 91. F " Lot 63 844 14 102 93 C " Lot 64 844 20 101 91 E " Lot 64 844. 19 `'�99 90 E " Lot 28 844 14 105 91 G " Lot 27 844 16 100 91 C " Lot 26 8-43 17 104 92 C-1 " Lot 25 842 16 99 90 E " Lot 24 837 14 164 92 C-1 " Lot 23 8,34 13 100 91 C " Lot 23 834 12 103 94 C " Lot 22 8,30 .. 14 ' 101, 93 C " Lot 20 846 20 103 91 C-1 " Lot 20 846 16 108 93 •r " Lot 63 823 14 100 91 rF " 'Lot 62 ". 821 14 '100 92 " Lot 61 824 13 •99 90 F " Lot 59 846 16 99 90 F " Lot 59 845 15 104 90 zG . " Calm Brook 843 14 104 90 G " Lot 28 ". 843 14 99 90 F . I S. E. PA--dall & Associatas, Inc. i TABLE I w. o. 605D COMPACTION TEST RESULTS Dry Relative Test Date Test Loc./ Elev. moisture Density Compaction Soil No. of Test Tract No. (Feet) (% dry weight) (pcf) Tyne 1 _(%) 1440 10/20/78:'Lot 27/Tr29053 847 20 100 91 E 1441 I,Lot 27 846 19 102 91 C-1 Lot 25 846 19 99 91 _ F i1442 .1443 Lot 25 843 16 102 93 C 1444 " Lot 24 839 16 101 92 C 1445 Lot 23 636 108 93 G 1446 Lot 22 836 .16 15- 97 90 F 1447 Lot 22 832 20 99 90 E 1448 Lot 24 832 14 108 93 G '1449 Lot 40 839 14 96 91 G 1450 Lot 38 185 15 102 93 C 1451 Lot 37 779 14 98 91 F Lot 36 781 16 103 91 C-1 '1452 1453 Lot 36 793 13 99 91 C 1454 ". Lot 36 793 12 102 93 C 1455 Lot 43 792 15 100 91 C 1456 Lot 44 800 12 104 95 C 1457 Lot 44 806 17 101 90 C-1 1458 Lot 45 813 14 101 92 C '1459 Lot 39 812 19 102 92 E 1460 Lot 30 840 17 101 91 E 1461 Lot 31 840. 15 "'99 90 C Lot 45 840 15 99 90 C '1462 1463 Lot 72 840 13 100 91 C 1464 10/23/78 Lot.72/Tr29053 794 16 102 92 E 1465 Lot 71 .795 16 103 90 C 1466 Lot 71 796 15 • 99 91 C 1467. " Lot 70. 797 .17 101 92 E: 1468 Lot.70 802 : 17 .102 92 E • 1469 Lot 69 ". 804 15 105 92 G 1470 Lot 68 .809 18 100 91 -E Lot 64 813 18 101 •-:9.0 '1471 1472 Lot 64 ". 843 17 101 92 E '. .. 1473 Lot 64 843 19 101 90 C-1 '1475 1474 Lot Lot 63 63 843 843 14 16 103 102 94 92 C '•,E 1476 " Lot 63 843 16 101 91 E 1477 Lot 64 843 16 101 92 C '1478 Lot 64 843 15 102 94 b ' 1479 Lot 63 843 15 103 94 C . 10/24/78 Lot 64/Tr29053 865 14 109 95 G '1480 1481 Lot 64 " 865 9 104 90 C 1482 Lot 64 867 12 104 90 G 1483 Lot 63 867 12 102 93 C 1484 Lot 63 869 18 99 90 E 1485 Lot 63 869 5 104 90 G 1486 Lot 59 871 14 94 90 B ' 1487 Lot 59 871 18 101 91 E S. E. ilpdall Associates, Inc. TABLE I W. 0. 605D COMPACTION TEST RESULTS Dry Relative Date , . Test Loc./ Elev. Moisture Density Compaction Soil of. Test Tract No. (Feet) (Z dry weight) (pcf.) _(7) Tyne 10/24/78 Lot 64/Tr29053 873 12 100 92 C " Lot 64 8.73 11 100 91 C " Lot 27 818 18 101 91 E " Lot 27 828 19 101 91 E " Lot 26 8,30 18 101 91 E " Lot 25 830 •19 102 9-1. C-1 Lot 24 832 22 105 93 C-1 " Lot 23 832 19 101, 91 F " Lot 22 834 19 102 92 E Lot 23 834 17 103 91 C-1 " Lot 25 836 17 101 91 E " Lot 26 836 21 102 90 C-1 " Lot 70/Tr34160 FG 1.6 100 92' C " Lot 69 .FG 14 97 91 A " Lot 68 FG 11 101 92 C Lot 67 FG 15 108 93 G ' " Lot 66 FG 14 104 90 G " Lot 65 " FG 16 98 91 F " Lot 64/Tr29053 875 18 100 91 E " Lot 64 875 16 102 92 E " Lot 63 877 16 104 93 C-1 " Lot 63 877 14 101 92 C " Lot 64 879 19 103 91 C-1 " Lot 63 879 20 100 91 E " Lot 63 881 15 103 94 C " Lot 64 881 13 101 92 C . Lot 59 883 15 100 90 E " Lot 63 883 18 102 90 C-1 " Lot 54/Tr34161 888 16 103 91 C-1 " Lot 53 892 14 109 96 C-1 " 'Lot 76/Tr29053 888' 15 105 93 -C-1 " Lot 76 890 14 100 -90— " Lot 81 905 18 98 90 " Lot 82 834 11 91 82 E " Lot 83 918 16 100 92 F " Lot 83/Tr34160 918 13 104 92 +C " Lot 52 900 16 105. 93 C-1 " Lot 51 900 16 105 9.3 C-1 .%..=. MF:di!)i cat i1;iSOCiili2,S, Inc. i :TABhE I W. 0. 605D COMPACTION TEST RESULTS ' i Dry Relative Test Date Test Loc./ Elev. Moisture Density Compaction Soil No. of Test Tract No. (Feet) (Z dry weight) ( cf) (`/,) Type 1.526 10/26/78 Lot 64/Tr29053 885 18 104 92 C-1 1527 1528 Lot Lot 64 " 63 885 8187 12 17 104 103 90 92 G C-1 1529 Lot .63 887 16 101 92 E 1530 Lot 63 890 16 101 92 C '1531 Lot 59 890 19 101 91 E 1532 Lot 64 892 15 102 93 C 1533 Lot 64 892 12 102 93 C Lot 63 896 19 100 91 E '1534 1535 Lot 63 898 17 101 92 E 1536 Lot 74/Tr34160 8.80 19 99 90 E 1537 " Lot 75 880 18 101 91 E. '1538 Lot 76 883 17 100 90. E 1539 Lot 82 883 14 104 90 G 1540 Lot 82 883 20 101 91 E 1541 10/29/78 Lot 75/Tr34160 885 17 99 90 E 1542 Lot 74 885 18 100 91 E 1543 Lot 74 8'87 16 104 92 C-1 1544 Lot 75 887 16 102 93 E 1545 Lot 75 887 17 103 91 C-1 1546 Lot 33 FRG 15 '106 94 C-1 1547 Lot 31 ;-2 15 104 90 G 1548 Lot 32 1-2 16 105 93 C-1 1549 Lot 31 FRG 14 105 91 G 1550 10/30/78 Lot 55/Tr29053 895 13 103 91 C-1 1551 Lot 54 895 14 105 91 G Lot 53 687 13 101 90 C-1 '1552 1553 Lot 58/Tr34160 887 16 102 91 C-1 1554 Lot 55/Tr29053 8,87 15 101 91 E 155-5 Lot 55 889 17 99 -90 '1556 Lot 54 8,89 14 99 90 -. -_C ... 7" 1557 Lot 54 888 13 96 91 B 1558 Lot 53 8.88 14 92 90 C 1559 Lot 58/Tr34161 8:89 13 98 93 tB ' 1560 10/31/78 Lot 50/Tr34161 898. 12 101 92 C 1561 Lot 49 902 13 103 94 C 1562 Lot 48 906 16 99 90 C 1563 Lot 48 910 20 108 96 C-1 1564 Lot 79 915 15 104 90 G '1565 Lot 80 917 15 99 90 C 1566 Lot 82 920 i 12 105 91 G i i LI S. M. Madall a Associ_ las, Inc. ! TABLE I 605D COMPACTION TEST RESULTS ! Dry Relative Test Date Test Loc./ Elev. Moisture Density Compaction Soil !No. of. Test Tract No. (Feet) (`/, dry wcicht) Vic£) ('/,) ape 1,567 10/31/78 Lot 82/Tr34160 923 16 101 92 C 1568 Lot '53/Tr29053 8'83 18 105 .95 C-1 1569 Lot 53 885 16 104 92 G 1570 Lot 54 " 887. 20 102 91 C-1 1571 Lot 54 887 9 109 .95 G IT Lot 55 11873 .19 102 91 C-1 !1572 1573 Lot 55 875 19 101 90 C-1 1574 Lot 55 " 878 18 100 91 E ! 1575 ll/l/78 -Lot 62/Tr29053 890 12 101 90 C-1 1576 Lot 62/Tr34160 890 13 105 91 G 1577 Lot' 61 894 13 104 90 G !1578 Lot 61 894 18 104 93• C-1 1579 Lot 60 900 20 104 93 C-1• 1580 Lot' 60 900 16 105 91 G Lot 59 910 19 103 92 C-1 !1581 1582 Lot 59 910 14 105 91 G 1583 Lot 58/Tr29053 915 13 105 91 G ! 1584 1585 " . Lot Lot 58/Tr34160 62 915 8�93 21. 12 101 102 90 93 C-1 C 1586 Lot 62 893 16 105 93 C-1 1587 "' Lot 61 8;97 14 104 90 G !1588 " Lot 61 IT 8�97 16 103 91 C-1 1589 Lot 60 903 20 101 90 C-1 _. 1590 Lot 60 903 15 102 93 E 1591 Lot 59 912 15 102 93 C 1592 Lot 59 IT912 16 104 90 G 1593 IT Lot 58 If917 18, 103 91 C-1 ! 1594. " Lot 58 to917 22 103 91 C�l 1595 11/2/78 Lot 62/Tr34160 895 12 103 92 C 1596 Lot 62 It895 7 100 =91 !1597 Lot 61 899 19 104 93 _G 1598 Lot 61 ". 899 14 101 90 C=1 1599 Lot 60 " 905 15 104 90 G 1600 Lot 60 IT 905 16 103 94 C ' 1601 Lot 59 914 16 103 94 "C 1602 'Lot 59 9.14. 14 103 94 C ! 1603 1604 Lot Lot 58 ". 58 918 918 15 15 104 106 90 92 G G 1605 Lot 84 888 16 108 96 C-1 1606 Lot $4 888 17 105 93 C-1 !1607 Lot 85 895 14 107 93 G 1608 Lot 85 895 15 105 91 G 1609, Lot 86 900 16 104 90 G ! S. E. IAadail & Associates, Inc. 1 Test ' No. 1610 1611 1612 1613 1614 '1615 1616 1617 '1618 1619 1620 1 1621 1622 1623 '1624 1625 1626 ' 1627 1628 1629 1630 1631 1632 1633 1 1634 IJ 1 1 I 1 1 Date of Test 11/2/78 It It „ „ „ , TABLE I W. O.605D COMPACTION TEST RESULTS Dry Relative Test Loc./, E1ev. Moisture Density Compaction Soil 'tract No. (Feet) (/, dr} caeig it) (pcf) (Y) Type Lot 86/Tr34160 900 14 105 91 G Lot 87 915 16 101 92 C Lot 87 915 12 100 90 E :Lot 88 925 19 101 . 90 C-1 Lot 88 925 16 108 93 G Lot 85 " 896 16 98 90 F Lot 84 892 15 100 91 C Lot 86 " 905 15 99 90 C Lot 85 898 13 99 90 C Lot 57 9.06 i 17 101 90 C-1 Lot 84/Tr34160 400 13 98 90 C Lot 84 1900 12 100 91 C Lot 85 899 9 103 90 G Lot 85 899 16 102 93 C Lot 86 915 9 102 93 C Lot 86 915 11 102 93 C .Lot 87 917 10 100 92 C Lot 87 917 18 102 90 C-1 Lot 88 927 12 100 91 C Lot 88 9,27 14 101 92 C Lot 57 907 12 `100 91 C Lot 57 908 14 100 92 C Lot 56 917 10 101 92 E Lot 56 517 13 100 91 C Lot 57 910 15 103 93 E S. `A?dzA1 et AsS0C17i2s, Inc. Lot Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 19 20 21 22 24 25 I i i TABLE II DEPTH OFjFILL -.TRACT 34160 Depth of Lot Fill (feet) Number 27' 26 4 4 ' 27 64' 28 46 29 48' 30 59, 31 63' 32 42' 33 55' 34 60' 35 50' 36 46' 37 50' 38 45' 39 25' 40 31' 41 29' 42 3' 43 3' 44 3' 45 3' 46 4' 3' W. O. 605D Depth of Fill (feet) 40' 40' 61' 63' 14' 3' 3' 3' 3' 52' 70' 75' 68' 48' 60' 47' 20' 17' 12' 6' 10, S. E. Pliedall & Associates, Inc. I 1 I I i a) O U N O O 0 ri = _ ro .a cn -oo ro q = ro q 7 a) a) .7 ro� E O to .M i cO q q N 3 _I 0 u w w u .0 •p ... X? ¢ u o uxID •�+o � a,a- `i a •ri 0• u X +� M 0) M 'ro N H •-i .-i F .7 F W ;� al �o O+ q u i C) � S m o t n }+ O $4 O ro N -0 �O . ,-1 rn q_ q cO cO qro cvA �7i G p I I 7 uO X k +jMH al 00 u 0 0 Ni= , -0 3 0 ro U O O N i 0 O W - N M •14 CG) =•" w ^a Ln N 00 q N q E u o I .•1 .-a tz .--i . w 0rz a •� X a z o Z0 Zo -a o N 0._OL Y. aJ M ri N ii _X ..y .Ni H d' /L' O 4 q 3 T >. 0 a •rG1 O O U W N N M yJ yoj 0 r+ •-+ to ro co ro 12. - 4 O z al + r u 0 G .0 G o• 5 0 to ca a) 0 7 5ro." 205 ."0 . H � ri .w • X aGi y v u u C) G O N d N E G o O u •,� H to U 0 44 H i%) i+ aro) G. •rll C G O O q W •14 •ri U 11 O W G G x 1 O N a) N N ro •ri 0 " P )4 G a) u F o r; p!.. bc co -H p •rl 0. O o •1! •O 0. w CJ � G U O a-) u O N al ro O A I 10 •ri 00 M G q N In a p co14 N a) cori 0 a) f+ N to 1 1 O f+ r•1 a) 0 u rl I to a) F. u C 0. Oa () 0 00 0 U) ♦J •ri 0 In a) ro 'u a) to ro X G G S G a) O a) H z 3 u ro 74 G cl W •rl O H •H 0o p H H Q 1+ ••'1 O W O O Pu 0 pN N O .0o'U O o a) ro H ro rI N H O a) w n4 co w m x o .1l ro U W 1 U •0 O u bO Qj •rl •11 Do P. U u 0 •O i+ aG) U' w N > r--I N ,L] N U 'j 0 0 o00 3 H Q, •=1 a) N .4 N •rI N •T n U x ro L x O x u i4 0 W N H rz O -0 G w O) CO 0 N G G o o a) 10 p C (J a) W w. 3 cci H w u a) N •C W 0 W O o co .0 ((aa G 1+ OD ro •rl 1•1 •r1 H L W u u ra N N T1 1) H W :J la M i1 a aw o 0 m + v a o x 0 v '-1 a) ro a) N N r-i G A a) s4 u to .44 ai 0 N `al •0 0 rHi r ro ea o W II m y.l 1-4 (a W •rGi N °n. v ro m� i o 0 A q ro G p G W Cl .T •rl a) 0. •14 1 v o E G u w •ri ,roc G O S4 u M +� a) >1 .C: N G •v 1-4 .a •• 'i o ' o N ro •0 r-1 u y4 t4 •O C W G 'O O as 0 0 ro •r1 a) •ri .�4. a.+ 7 '3 $4 u U W U o O o a) I u H O :3 H P. n N F [A H .c N ro G 1 W w G x ro ro N •r1 q 0 v x v 3 o p 0 oa ro $3 a) N 0 .-I ni 0 v O' F N 0 ro X O G u N N )-IN •d u Fi J-i M H 0 'O O' M }.i P. P. rJ ? .-Oi ta 41 A 7 H ro O •.�-i . H P W O • •O G G --._ - - 00 P. N O O a) u 0) -A •rl' ro •ri U COL W N O lu+ P .O U 1-1 3+ O O P. roa) w ri G. G H P. o G U a1 •rri 41 0. G X wG O o "a uc 5 0' aitlo i 1 -H v ro u 14 7 u •O a) p\ N O o fj 0.N ¢ Ce G1 PI 0 " a az t� o .-1 N M �7 ✓1 J• i� 1 Weather.field Homes November 30, 1978 ' W. 0. 605n ' ,TABLE III Notes (Continued) 8. As an alternate to tie bars (note 6), the mesh in the floor slabs could be bent into the footing. 9. Reinforcement in the garage floor slabs is recommended ' but it is not mandatory if random cracking and possible separation at the cracks are acceptable. 1 , ' I 3 1 ' S. E. Medall & Associates, Inc. TABLE IV ON�,PAD UTILITY TRENCH BACKFILL RECOMMENDATIONS 1. SHALLOW -TRENCHES (max. depth of trench 2 feet): use any soil approved by Soil Engineer compacted to 90%(1) and tested by Soils Engineer; OR jet soil in, if back - fill Sand Equivalent exceeds 30 and probing by Soils Engineer; drainage required to dissipate water. ' 2. DEEP TRENCHES (depth of trench greater than 2 feet): use any soil approved by Soil Engineer, mechanically compacted to 90%(1) and tested by Soils Engineer; OR ' jet soil to top of conduit, if Sand Equivalent greater than 30, (probing required); mechanically compact remainder to 90%(l) testing required by Soil Engineer. NOTE: if trench depth exceeds 5 feet(2), placement/compaction method should be approved by the Soils Engineer. ' 3. TRENCHES UNDER VEHICLE PAVEMENTS:. A minimum of 3 feet of.cover should be placed over conduit, apply criteria 2 above. 4. TRENCHES NEAR FOOTINGS: All back - fill in shaded area must be mechan- ically compacted to 90%(l); Soil G• Engineer to test and approve back- F�A •afill soil; Soil Engineer may approve a: jet backfill if.drainage is avail- able.. Soil Engineer must approve 1 special design if conduit under ' footing. ' Notes: (1) Relative compaction, basedon maximum dry density 1 attained in-ASTM Test Designation D 1557-70. ' (2) Contractor should exercise necessary and required safety precautions in all trenching operations. (3) In order for us to provide a written opinion as to adequacy of soil compaction and trench backfill, the operations should be performed under our observation. and testing. Ample notification is requested. lJ S. E. Madall & Associates, Inc. RECEIVED ' ANAHEIM. TEST LABORATORY UT231.978 17351,E ORANOETHORPE PARK ANAHEIM,CALIPORNIA92801 - ' PHONE (714) 871-8631 S.E. EDALL & ASSOCIATES DATE: 10-18-78 \ ' P.O. No. Verbal Shipper No. Wo 605 Tr 3416o :. Lab. No. K-2265-1-4 Specification: . Material: Soil SOLUBLE SULFATE per Calif 417 A ' SA1,1PLE LOTS SOLUBLE SULFATE (ppm) 10 35-38 •139 1.2 30 :0341 ' 14 26-29 .0234 16 14-19 .0251 1 t . ' ANAHEIM TEST LAPORATORY . / James /s. ellns, Ghic(Chun•�s� • i ANAHEI.M TEST LABORATORY ' 1735'%ORANGETHORPE PARK . ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92801 ' PHONE (714) 871-8631 �0: S.E. KEDALL & ASSOCIATES 8-25-78 DATE: ' P.O. No. Verbal Shipper No. - ' Lab. No. K-2069-1-2 Specification: ' Material: Soil -� WO 605 D Tract 34160 ' SOLUBLE SULFATE per Calif 417 A ' Lot Soluble Sulfate (ppm) 3-7 280 ' 8-11 436 ;t 1 I' i ' ANAfIEDI TEST ILABORRA,roi%t JlRlly^s A: I:nl os, Ch1t1 Chemise ' SOII: EROSION CONTROL RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SLOPE AREAS The fill and cut slopes for this project have been designed to minimize water -induced surficial erosion/sloughing, provided that. permanent erosion control measures are initiated as soon as possible ' after completion of slope construction. However, all soil slopes . will undergo some erosion when subject to sustained water application. To minimize long-term erosion, we have listed below some important'. points to be considered when planning, designing and installing/. ' implementing slope erosion control plans. 1. All berms, terrace drains and surface drain inlets should . ' be properly maintained. A'qualified Engineer should review any proposed additions or revisions to these systems, to evaluate their impact on slope erosion. 2. Local experience;indicates that -the upper 3 to 5 feet of slope soils may be subject to water. -induced mass erosion. Therefore, a suitable proportion of slope plantings should have root systems which will develop well below 5 feet. We suggest consideration of drought -resistant shrubs and low trees for this purpose. Intervening areas can then be planted with lightweight surface plantings with shallower root systems. In any event,' lightweight, low -moisture plantings should be used. 3. Construction delays, climate/weather conditions, and plant growth rates may be such that additional short-term, non - plant erosion control measures may be needed; examples would be matting, netting, plastic sheets, deep (5 ft) staking, etc.. 4. Major erosion can be initiated by seemingly insignificant events: rodent burrowing, human tresspass (foot prints) in damp areas, small concentrations of uncontrolled surface/subsurface water; or poor compaction of utility trench backfill on slopes. 5. High water content in slope soils is probably'a'major factor in slope erosion or,slope failures. Therefore, zM possible precautions should be taken to minimize soil. moisture. Slope irrigation systems should be properly operated and maintained and system controls should:be placed under strict control. 6. if completion of ,new slopes occurs during the rainy ' season, contingency plans should be developed to provide prompt temporary protection against major erosion/sloughing . One method would be to place plastic sheeting over the slopes. If this is ' carefully coordinated with the Landscape Architect/Contractor, plantings might be placed prior to sheeting placement, thus minimize any delays in the plant growth program. I -SE 1 S. E. Meda)I & AGsociales, Inc. 1 We strongly recommend that•a "team effort" be used to developed t the erosion control program. The team should consist of the Civil and Soil Engineers, the Engineering Geologist, the Landscape Archi- tect/contractor and the Developer/Owner.. To assist- in developing t a landscape program, we have listed below several references. Finally, we recommend that a ."Slope Area Maintenance Manual" be developed by the erosion control team, for use by homeowners and ttheir Associations. . The above recommendations are intended for guidance purposes. ' Situations will vary and therefore, erosion control plans will differ. No guarantee is made as to performance, but we believe these recommendations meet the generally accepted standards of ' our profession at this time. Erosion Control References 1. "Slope Protection for Residential Developments", National ' Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C. (1969) 2. "Guide for Erosion and Debris Control in Hillside Areas", ' Department of Building and,Safety, City of Los Angeles (1970) . 3. "Slope Stability Report", Orange County Department of Building and Safety (1973) ' 4. "Guides for Erosion and Sediment Control", Soil Conversation .Service, Davis, California, U.S. Department of Agriculture (1977) ' S. "Rain -Care and Protection of Hillside Homes", brochure undated, published by Building and Safety Division, Los Angeles County ' Engineer. 6. "Guidelines for Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and,_ ' Implementation",.Office of Research and Monitoring, U.S. Epvironmental Protection Agency,. (1972) ✓ 7. "Resource Conservation Glossary", Soil Conservation Society ' of America (1970) 8. "Standards and Specifications for Soil Erosion and Sediment ' Control Developing Areas", Soil Conservation Service, U.S. Department, of Agriculture (1975) ' 9. "Homeowners Guide for,Debri.s and Erosion Control", Los Angeles County Flood Control District (undated). 10. "Grading Guidelines" (8 pages, stapled sheets), Building ' and Safety Division, Department of County Engineer., County of Los Angeles (undated, but probably about 1977) 1 S. E. Nleda11 & Associates, Inc. II -SE LEGEND X 1633 APPROX. LOCATION OF DENSITY TEST o '"nr 'APPROX. LIMITS OF FILL STRIKE & DIP OF BEDDING ® HORIZONTAL BEDDING sJOINT ATTITUDE ...jpi VERTICAL JOINT FAULT ATTITUDE .� VERTICAL, FAULT 3T /¢� ATT:fTUDI'S TAKEN DURING GRADING P� 'CROSS SECTION BORINGS (DRILLED AT ORIGINAL GROUND SURFACE) BY MEDALL £, ASSOC. BY MEDALL $ ASSOC. 10-9-76 BY LAWMASTER F, MERRILL ® .BY LOCKWOOD SINGH owma Rae 76.117� PI'fS'(DUG AT ORIGINAL GROUND SURFACE) BACKHOE DOZER e We COMPACTED FILL Td.. rnn:ni•rr FOOMATT F. ' COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPART14EITT OF COUNTY ENGINEER BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION SUPERVISED GRADING INSPECTION CERTIFICATE (To be filed in duplicate at the local Building and Safety Office) Job Address tr Tract No. Trait 34160 Locality DIAMOND BAR dner Diamond Ridge, A Joint Venture Permit No. ' ❑ ROUGH GRADING CERTIFICATION ❑ BY SOILS ENGINEER (A) I certify that the earth fills placed on the following lots were installed upon competent and ' properly prepared base material and compacted in compliance with requirements of Building Code Section 7010. I further certify that where the report or reports of an engineering geologist, relative to this site, have recommended the installation of buttress fills or other similar stabilization measures, such earthwork construction has been completed in accordance with the approved design. LOT NOS. 1 through 17 and 20 through 46 See report dated .for compaction test data, recommended ' allowable soilbearing values and other special recommendations. EXPANSIVE SOILS (YES) ($4) LOT NOS. all Lots ' BUTTRESS FILLS (YES) (iss�J LOT NOS. 5-29,31-34, 39-44 Remarks ' Engineer Reg. No R.C.E.26096 Date 11/30/78 Luis Fernando g ignat ❑ BY SUPERVISING GRADING ENGINEER '(B) I certify to the satisfactory completion of rough grading including: grading to approximate final elevations; property lines located and staked; cut and fill slopes correctly graded and located in accordance with the approved design; swales and terraces graded ready for paving; berm's installed; and required drainage slopes provided on the building pads. I further certi- fy that where report or reports of an engineering geologist and/or soils engineer have been prepared relative to this site, the recommendations contained in such reports have been followed in the prosecution of the work. LOT NOS. Remarks 1 Engineer Signature Reg. No. Date ' FINAL GRADING CERTIFICATION (C) I certify to the satisfactory completion of grading in accordance with the approved plans. '1 All required drainage devices have been installed; slope planting established and irrigation systems provided (where required);and adequate provisions have been made for drainage of surface waters from each building site. The recommendations of the soils engineer and/or engineering geologist (ifsuch persons were employed) have been incorporated in the_,wprk_. LOT NOS. Remarks .Engineer Reg. No. Date Signature 1 DEPARTMENT USE ONLY: Tract No. Permit No. Date Report approved by Title Date Items approved: ❑ A ---Lot Numbers ❑ 'B---Lot Numbers ❑ C---Lot Numbers Soils Report Dated Approved by Date Remarks 7/65 Of / fit. /{f ) / F-oe .001 Y. +`- -._ - r-_ _..Corr- ...r ` -., T �� ,P "s. -.. _.....1` �"Sr,.s►''��� ';� tit - ,r' '�i-1,100,400 N_4100,400 _ - 1 /////////%%%/// [J{/ \\ `\yam\•� yiNk 'IX / `• " . I l ,.. " `` - - - '• <\ - -- T 4 �' I" i ,\ ! ;1 v A 1!. �-\M. A .a • f V r �— 1 i (\! r1! a�} ' /j f� �:' �,/ / / r \ \ Y f ��C t� \\ \ 4 r , V C iJ Fi % {ji � / � � • �� � " � �/' { t /....I-.K u � J' JI nhi `'M.. , \ \1 i V I ._^r/C� . J •�' .` © F \n, /�\. "� J 1 1(/� 1�R XtlV z i1 i / \\'v �- , ' i r / f x X \ \ ���� ,• /'' s c i2 # ` /877-3 TANK 721 2 \ 909.3 719.8 rY Rol �_., : , - ✓ \ V / i 1 Sa ASS. \ / `' OJ` \- t_' `� / a�l '- 1fI/L \ \ �. N j / `\ �� �.. ` -\ -; �� /f \\ / Z TARGET�j\ r q / .2 SHEA.P KEYS OA241N 2S S A9X' L✓ b" ^�f /� OUTLET PE OETA/L SffT / o� s a7� 5 Q ,_,r // y '', _ /�h. o ir% ' \. i �' `^\ i•.1.- 0,1 ' / �\ / / ' ^�; ^\; \ , \ _ \ �•'f\, ` jz/ �� \ 1 �\ - / pill,�\\,. \ 4 \7t7/f� \ i uli �V\ �. Di -`" m -.\ /'•\ '� •! �' % .. ,\ � 1 a � r -__ �/ r es, /. t , __ p'i __ / ." `5 \ � �, / `e nl PtCI %•® \ i i JW � , N 7✓ � \\� d i � �� , i� \ :'\ r b Y' ' 1 �1 � � 7 \� v '� •"d � '- i - --., • �\ _,.+-._� -. � ./ O 1'12 r `_1/ i � \, / L t \ ..\ ^ / r r �' !;'o 'Y i\ 1. ( '•'�.if•' '\-Y'y yy X ' 0 ,`#����"'.��. .�,.--.✓::� � w. � � '`.\\�'i ,� ( v� ��'' ,.I �%: .�,��J'�✓- \ � / ' nor ,r' � � � -1 \'t� \.J i, / </7• r \„ _.,. .+ \\ � ... -�' �� � ` \ '�� •�4 � \ t y \ fr` A r \ / F G 2 %Yr_20 /+ b '�, cy_ < / ,4 ✓� ! C'V ► . - ,11� _ Vib� / t *' ,- '' Con VV" 'r 1'I / i _ A \ '. �y_ -�l ' / \\ - � � "�. �. ` r076 !-' . r j pC \.1 - - C. / ♦t. �`\ •l'"`e' �' ,� rtr '" - - .. 1�•' q 5:;i�. �, ` % o .._-.. .,.?7 l/•—' v ,� � _ _ Fa !. • �2a. ,\ V - � h r ag y 6S� ; \ ,r 1y, , � _ �' 1 f t7-_.'-`'_Corr_ ----_Corr•-- .` \ •-. �_. , �- - � � R / y.•+�. �S \,r `\ / ..� .43 • p 6> ' I '�'` 3s �ti` `!� V q.�4 ul\ \ 0' ` j `/; \` i \\ .. / /� -...� _` - -` \� '. p /1/A/ _ _y v � o �T q -I ._-� f� (} N y (� p .•.'!. �._� j .(. �_. %k+ 4 - - BOG %� ���-y� M+'T' �_ ly��Vq,,'IA' "1, i`, IM1 f 4� T,1'a/��l�ll 17-��3�11 , � god \ h: 0 ._ 7546 � X .. � �ij� / ��0, n. Tr S� l / �p 1 / -._� i _.. --.- -- `1 f�% •� - . _y�d''\�' `d7%' �y'rn r-/ � F Tr'_ i ;.v,JC` L / 1p `• \ ' �,� y �, - jib G r \ i V./ i n;' , \\ - - - _ 0�/` �i .r3 '!o �+• 70 1.0�' / � �• ,y \,h -a=�, \ go_G�' i �i / � r f ' `. i _ \\ c</ b/ / _"� h , iS •5.. / \ \ \, 9 C p_rr11C5 / \ 2 ' �� '< `T �'h'} 1 / 62. `,,, '-.. 1✓��b� \\�\ OB.V$%'8f O- N. VV NN ,l /�• ,, �po_ 3�s' T�i= 1' \ •� ' e, ��6Q K r- , 9 f_, 070 ` % - 1 rr W T 7�--•S - l , G i 1 \ l II �. a�. ® //28 \ gyp\ a I \� j I - - - ' 7450 / \ N. -� 1- L5 I l%: y vT'�'P / \ . / •��- \ _ - ♦' ,`c j i _ `' � � �„ �l � F f � � b � • `' � r �t, l / / �Q • •. n t 1 .' /.'" �/� � V'� /r e�`\ \ ^ �� '� s • _ - i /J - J D J 5 \ r r- 3, '_ � � 7 \ � ^'� .SOd � i,:� !C � � n; n /'Y`r�, \ !1 f c' („�.-•-.._��- �/1//ter Oa ! , ' ( 6r� ell Ile, (-I � - a� ' ''� •\ ' ,. \ J %y" 1 /\ 3 n ,• 1 '� - . -- • .�_, -. •..... - - / J"ayy r ,'O,/°'— Y L'"'. , 1 7^ "-' `i�" tf`•��/ " T25 \/" i -'%'. - b_ .. \ \\\ x/ - /''� �' 7 ��/ I - _ PE j 11, " /� �"I+' �' D' J' • (�7 Bb' �V', 0 62 ,,,. Co-�y � �9 •: �--_"a� % � .� '`/ a _-____-.--Corr•_- �, 2�U O �r - � � , : �� M1 v v � '� - � � � � / Ib• ' v �!' A: b�'�' �n� t \` .s... e� • � I, ~/ 119 Y' POW" 04 - ` S R E. 7t'P. 1•'' , !/'!J - - // /P 1' �7 3 t . ��/ ,-.. \- \ Gj�ax / /I i ' / } l _ vi � r ' h ! -- -"'"'""� Z � 1 �'-?" - 5 • G � J 0/ I i ��/.�' �'% 9.. ' � !� �, . / +\ - a� ' ( fit 0> �� `/"�'� _ \ 4� / � '� � �s �fY� � p � �i'l � %''^�._,_,_. - ___ ,�9r' - / ar„r Dom' 8. , _ _\ �` (� � `�' �- ZO M � �'v�UBDRA/ ,'; �` /�/ -7r, 4� �1/ �: �Z-\�'P� , \ f�8�o i s• ' r, '�! '�'/ ' -- Corr- ` s 9 68 -"__ 1,'4 \� \ � � �'. -_. \ \ f, \. / 6 jj / ` 4 r 1681 6�6 108 / _'---- - rr--- S qL \ < �; :�"` t - r ,,; Corr—_ _--•+---- _____ ________ � � 7 7zi -- `` 'h t ti a- \. I _.. f/ \) - / /_... w .•. 5' - _ k+ //�/j/�/�/'� >_55/.`'/ - G\< \' < \ \ca 'i •\ 0.•i ! / r/ '' �I \ /�� j_ .7��:jj/�� `13� I ,{..,,, z... •i '�\w \ '--��reLf' -T -� ,( i r➢ .�t1'�i�2y/_ - �\ \'�p � i ,t � � i ,:'// .�.-. `.,--. ♦ ---_.-..�`/�-+_. / \,. •�"' `\- �"Y�. �r _+-far Corr 1 Zt:/ � 1 - \ ,i' �� /�5'� `j" �\. i�� \ `.. \-`-_ \ �—,!/ � s , �V j" 1 �•` / r f � //,�/,;-\ / rl T" Y, _ //_ �4 / � � > p -fj-i '�'r '�J' .,.d"3-•r i /0 `':. � /i/�C.. rj m �I_ , i r \ �r� •�'. !' f` 1 \ Corr � ij' ` Y!/u,G , ,,' -` � \' , ,� �,�, yr _.._ \ �[ G J �` f r C J £` - _ - \ ^• _ - \\;.\, �. _ ,p, a',"' �P'-Corr--- \...:y _,'t-' ° •'.a' a9/ 1 \ , _ `` r^-^'r\\\ �-� 1 / .i s ✓� c "X ,\ /51� \ � / gyp ti" / �� i ' N, I-n� 6, (,v o ,r� \ '�f'' I a /`T��" h IQGi"J �„� 73 111 y ` o r � ^ i '\ ' � ; 1t � � \ ` `, � .• I scaLE: ': , D' � ;o \a 9 o ae es u•rto t .✓ \ t \.. \ '` TO ENO Or /!"CMP, " �. / .jy 14 N V•/ •� ,� \ ', , /'IVECO TO yl,x ,, 3..�r\ ,,� B p ;• ,/ � � \ � � �i0'3�_ •_' ff 111/ �;.-.,. \ � 45. O.C. � ` �� (1 0 „`r• �/ \ CJ \ / sreVC7VRE A ,. _ � ... , . "•Corr -- r_ _ J ; �._.� • • ' . � \ �.�, V � l/4 � ,; 9 - _ �� Corr \ c R E 5 f0 LEGEND SEE PLATt 4 — L. - Corr - 11 w��• - -- : _ -�__ , , 7jJ ., - C_ E. Mada116 ociat Ina ' •> ,•.,` - ._ •-7.-_._._____\\ `\ `�Corr— - ,� . ! _ / n�'1- :�� f'1 - \;`. \ .� ._• i%. \ - '\ ... i- i yy_wJ,�•��"'" ,".o' , �zii0/i,SL e.�,o ea=n. ?so aarn •' ' _` Ir r N. \ __ 1p � t � ` � �� CA \ -� L 7�Yf _ - Y `'.PEirvFdecr/va sruLDATE // 30 Tf3 J68 CGL t2O BY U/ 16..3' 5 Or //� �, f SCALE / s fo .0. ea,5Z _ L:,'�^FCD.. r j/ o b8'*'- \ v. / FG 1� o' `/�J , ��.Tl,� .9 3, Q Rt J ( /, ��' C��A JD// /�7 PL / ' N In TiP T 3 4 l Co 0 F JG� +i fi No/ 1:- r _ t,.r--__ B5C7 — - �' D , %LS � �, � ':, ,/ �,�;" •.. ,: ♦," 5�� {� ,gCT N� �4 �//` _ ` _ SNE�T 3 L7f w CM/0 /NLET / j i • Y , 9 -Jill oll \ b i T R i E E S X J 0, 16 820 R,-.. �_ +* x 1 �'� ` ��.. i � / .. % , _ "_ _ •_ r_ /.O _ - 1 ��/ l � � / 1 � I'h*/ / ! �(t 4'190, N-4 00�00/%I tI��f�30 - I J R E- E S e/ - - \ - I T r P 30 37 9 xf/ -- -- . ' t..^�. "i...t, - \ �' \ , "2Ti'i- -\ _ ...�, J•�_-� \\ T• C +n �'�� �x OI '2 i / /�3r. �O �, \ Q`i�----_•�-- �__' -"--� i# -r--- ��. / \ el ��� tS • 330 %25S 4' "3 273 wp y -All, 234 11 41 372 \ 37 y ,� ♦ r f ,% 1 `3 n' 'x D j sr r 373 - kza �Ss `� ��� 5� �g3 i34 V I 268 327 U $ pyg. 7r/`' �Iyj! 1013 t ' / [1\� 'Y r�. `` 01 :~` \" C 5�j -�_ ,' �� t Of - - � Y ,/7. - : -- `• (1•r; ' �'+ r -• 3�S \ ia�7 I ag 9e t i - Di�,/ i/ 1 �' 1 •!`� l �9.sY O/ .�-► t� N"'. 1.r_ �/ / fill �F \ \ 9 f 27/ t ; \ �•- ' � '' � — A `h� ` / { i -J �I f j � � y -�` EX/ 3 7 MOO�L S -. o ' �/ �,s7f• -.__. __. ,Y /r ( \ �-4 �,�oi % •, �.S" ,:�� -,t i ' F 5 •3 �t v �r �,: '' \ ` ,�. 1 � /A ',1f� - ,�/ p1 / � �I ; �PfIC T N- 3 000 4 3Z , ', /i +n ' 1 - �;h ' y �i + , v 9 \� �: e _-�, I - _ T 4CT //9 33Ill-7- s ,%< ' ; *' " ` % '/l�J.J ° r• i - '� 5�, 272 � ,,' :I � � 'r , ' 'f � � � - • + �,, s � X { I � ��\ �—`""^ ��� V 3 - � / / I _ , _ 2113?3 �fq�\. 30' � L�. ' �� F I` u "- '_ .-�. � � / \�. � • � � X / - / • j' yip I�wr T�/ 'v.,Y \ M 1,322 411001 , 100,4 ,` �• � �J ��/^I'- / % _.:s.as•:.- • I �, �� •� '- �".-,*!'+'� It 1� ��' � 0�� - .G;/ � -'` / �qt. el yam. �' �'3. _._ _..�.-- - l} ot4 1 x. r, ' I%1 ��� �� _ Z '¢6 �•,. I r - � / �!� j� ® F ,'•.- +c �- �%\�', 11' ` � �D�i��j 1�/� j�' /'' �� � r'. 4 / /�'Y, \o y, /.. �-r aJr O .�. 0� a 2 2' {{ - , } `1�� / ® i 8 i - /� ` I !1 t �`. y 1 +. /� /� (�y/ / Lp- \\\ h I T '4�eli,Kill I --. - \`��`\\gip T� � �\ � \ r�l I %� _l,�—. \ -- • � . . i r�, ( r k '.�c- o ,p'.. S . � �'�h�. dY /'`'67ba' .` L � 6 �- \ ` \ 4 �� C� 1 mot✓ / 'F" 0' f'"/ � �1 l \ ,i �\ � � QI I �/ / / B � `I oO ✓/ \ y\\ I I ��'/// - o//� V X/01 - / ` , , / - _ '.' \ w •\ ' T� 1� �" 1_ �� — /'\ y y�' . .A' r,�hi',, /1 q�\\ �- / A\,., E ¢� 'P9¢. fi %T TOP �' - / J �j ,coo UN/ T / (.� r/ �/ r 2 \ R 11x t` t \ \ 0 \ \ erg, P If / TiPfiGT I/� 1� 81 b� y- 4N'p 3s 1 QF -J<� I ��a�'q� _ '� �6721.3 TANK t // � (i�I I v� ��`� _ _ lam, `,r �� C- /sY9p �I /� i x ,1 j / �i Q \re��� 8 \/3 ��` `��\�✓" 7 \ 909.3 / ` \\/jfCz\j�\ �� �v/x 76 80 20323 I /7 3Y 7¢0 0 r' 'd` ' ��II.2 , �( ( / ',' q, '.i•. tjo �10 �'129 "'\d`, n =l• %oZc i✓/� ,// /i 2 a• P� �`\j7�/ JcpA g-cW/�/ S/� ` / e �,✓ . _ \1 \ \ �3 ' F a.., S� JJ�pB 4, 'LIP �X/5 T_. ; ^'�UN/T •. aa5.-�3 3 13 8 ,` ; - D. o �'y / �(: \� _�'/ P j' / o, \\ W/ i // \�v/Q� 7rPACT N� 33Z05 4,6 g p /o y �' •./ ;o��_�'' \ 2 tt 832 / Al O \ y _ 36l 8 �8�3� .'S / �r" / / ,\ �Y \. ✓ j� i �`✓'�� ��_ - - �.n.'LS--n p )1 /OJ - C�P3/ o o/ STlI r 4TF � (I 4 T _ 9 ¢6¢ 83 0, l 6 P5°5 ` ¢w 7,P�c�' ti'� 2�053 ?2,9c.T /_�T 278 �'-4vo " ,� --� �v 3z 80.�°-,3, 127 IN rollIDfx Q /� 1 � t � , � - _ _ / do ;, TjfNTA T/ V T �O �3 / ¢ /3S l ♦03 0 ¢2 m \ ' �._A015 - - - 7 2 ll�_ f 71 1 2 fI I '' eL 4-0 7 is K E f Gl� ( \ \ �J�j/ / rG' k .! `/42,6 4 N7T ¢98a V i N - 410902989 95i 8578 B�5 h m�' �/ o. sod ¢� _ 4/ EL LeV. 9 5 4. 2 " .{'l^ rl ! ! / +� ' T.3 e . I _ �,,/ 6J �'o .._ 0fo if 71 if 71 rI S ' 8888 \` �4T(t T R £, E S\ na S. E MedaW `Associates, Inc. Consultants m the Earth Sciences A N 6,7721 c-�--- G/PAI.� 1^NG PL 16 t � � ; --�. � �r.,-.,J�. � - -�-�- DATE 111 D 79 BY J(,3 C C L W-O. _ it D i t ` /� t� Y_ - �t I �, ' / •,_ _ n - ! / \ 8 t ( '% SCALE "/ " — 40 SHEET ,v 2 of 6 T R, E - E /F Sf7L N SEE �" O 2 X Y, _�/VO i a / a 'r � v'I ' !( / /;�l .li/61r .: - 4c, '� ciao•✓c... j. % ! i /_ �_� f ///J� 16 0,16 D G N IA, 096 I , ------------ 0106 c i 0 �} J/ 7 ` li L e1 _ I 1 � i i I f _ 1 r - 0 O 111y1yJ Z fr •r - - - I i T!?,Z1 C T 0 75' 63 �' i �` N o, bE _ A 1 4 I i k I , =r y _l9 00 O I EA/ST/V f/LLE/J SEE SHEET 2 T.P e7583 ¢, NG Cs,�n/n/=4 To f3E 1 • I p P+'Cc N Kl ar A _ l „; ( , y_ , �� � � � 9 i e i 6GS it b 1 22 / SEE SI-/EET 2 TR. 276e,3 I / T a 2 17 _ s I b f i , v III I 9 / + "� 9Go r 1 p I35 r l I � II{ o � f 9 _ O i D i o 1 Y i 'I B83 6 / J ,6� 9_a i BB2.o 887. _ ��� �jl Ill — (3 Ink _- _ _T —T. - - -- —/ --- — J I 44 1 1- l J­ , lry p Y1' I 89/ �{ - r r I I I I A' � , I 1• I I ,�r I ( I 2 f f � e 609 'N 6 r co,' 6Z 63 6111 a0 /� i �, 987.0 B9 0 69 90 3a \ 9 , ,910% 3 a i 7! 2 r i � II . C9 88$.7 892.4 893./ \J O 0 Sir It N / � 4 \ \ O ✓VEST 1 S 1 14 YdAVII V. o , i �: > , I b°� �� .^• `-` X T VI-) SEC T/O/V ` �0 _ � I I 863.0 I 8bi i. 890.0 OF QT �' � E ' IN lb \,y i� �1 in I ' � ' t' I \ \ V ry , tlr 3'• Gu,ViTE .fi�.vF !�' , � V 11 la16"r6`_ /O /i0 WWm. �. � s a c, r p F 5 O TYI�/CAL S�Z T/O.V 1 T .4 / C EL I 1 T - -ea46 No CO l 30411 ,0 I ' i .n,p�;� 10I /3 U/ L T kv 7 E. L. PEARSON & AISSOCIATES I • 9g r K;z' a'A y e7 '' \ CIVIL ENCINBEAS i LAND CONSULTANTS 4/7;? .;✓7?v; 7J ` (213)321-Isis 1SG■rde■■+Cellfoondo rei■691ev■rd O-z \� ' -— —~T-- Prepared for 0247 (213)329-4125 I I I ✓ / "/ W1VLG - cy GA J, t14 ' ci T/1i/MAu dd/RR9 rcev7-CR 3 !NG /J/L' n 0.13 Ar,7 &.5 . /3L vim. T -%� f r / 0 1Q o o , \ Q p \ __..W _ — -- — . L03 4 l/d C1L E8 -CAL /F. 91h9a5 f \ P,gp,C�r i 2/3i C. III BB! O fff, !/V TF/E CO(l/V ,n r r _ COUNTY Of 105 NGc Lfa 7 der OQ �7 fa .Cienna' -wn Qe( 4u,- - / — - -- ------ - . ) iC C Daf ' 3 / 6EORSE R. SAUYE P. C. E /9a= Do-; � ----•®------- Ygt r.T i°,,./, . � ,,z � �- -_ ; Drawn R ,3, HEET 3._-OF 4 SHEE r-r / 4, (/OR � �� • • i P\ . • '� � -- -` � •r � � �%fir:' � � � �„ � 1 � � • ♦ � ISO • 7 III ` .� � � -. V' ��•'� � "'��'•�\ %� - � yl �� �� �- ' . WA • �, `• ►, � .' � ., � Jul � •• � V-oll lr- yam/AD NAP IWO dip wl11111111Iq to l I , ME .N 1, 1, _ <, / ._ r Y •w rr / Es ft two - ll. - t WAN On- , r •r i� �, ,� / Cam. , s '/ • � 6 A1- - -` t"i��1R•`�"Ip�..".Av-4 �11Y4�` .. .. .. , ,�... r' T c� _ -^ SEE 'SHGET ,vo 1 -_ �: i .� iv # !y �_.. .a• iiP': _. •�.. .1 -. .`R T^� .. '/_. ._. a'y` �-1`!:� -R `�.� � ---.. _ 1 ii -.� 1 t•1 f ��f- i. �; /�y� , �X f,� � ��r` / \ `` %� ! /i s. ILI 320 \ r14 Z7- - I i T 5 F 113— Q i A) M I v 1_• - T,L7L7CT 27563 �.1291�4 , _)J 9E? S+E E' •P P _O] 1 N I•I fR 1�. ,� - \ . � 314 3 - t 32 - - - - - - —g310 10 228 45 4- 5l' S3 33 424 1 /' 1 4r0 . 1 34-,j- S5 4Z. \ 1 44 .j 25 2 ( 264 260 \ I30? _ "�'er--'?...t .�,_ AxAs ). _ l�-, , .roe_. ; • JZ%Yi/ I 265 7D / t r a 27 54 i --- - 47 i /C so 43 35. 5240 I % 'JO i- rloc !}/t. I++r- Jo 3 ysV _99 f 171 �� 88 ! 4o SZ:�,f �494 103 1 ca - -`98 I f rl (.1 y� SJ \ 69 i 72, ' L — �r a- -c` , f - Y ' I •'� bl,, o eac S a!a r '�' -� �c . \ J ae 75 91 102r. I . � 1. ?6 I � -- ; -- µ�YS +,f � •' � ., . 1 J y \ G Y� •d f eeeu aa' i I evo Y .v ,. \� \" !j .�rKi \ 63 _ T' . 4 ♦ 84 4r - sf Aso 5r S1 \ I ly — — / _ es) ' a .r � - esr s )s .. i Tencr douv.o<,py �?S _ �r ,-73 . -a �'-- -- - -. -- ------ —..._ 1 SAME I OkIA14E/1 i 1 �'!.� -• •'h'di— Tim _ w� .Y•wfav ._`iwl3K'', �3::>�:(. 1�%"4,•raa..`�y+: • - _a' .. Y .. 'ems. � � � � � � r � ,r' h�,, /� �.�-� � ':� '� - �_ - _ _ ----- --- �` ' � .`... 1,..,.1 - � e� � �w a•.% -vt I.vfte ._ _1-afl[ tee•-a,�. �-'' _ _�='al.s.0 9-2.e.� ' _ ,-• q" - irs IMY •d/ -.1r 'J/J11. \ �_\' t.• r `f) .P'•` /' __ ;re • Yw. V� y .. ./,�, r f �.ZCIf I��--Lf��,-p•`r I � ' _: a �� � \ `� _ � f 2� w Ju � `^ � ' 91�� Nt0 a `I r 176 442�=-037F 391- - -.. ` i 1 r i 12 i rlr w14 35r /1,� �.. M.f3 / 'k;' i1 K i'� +1 IZ • �\[ I'73- f55� $43. j 3 // ..`i.`:37Z 37/qv 'I I1r Oat _ �' - qTz - 41'e'� .i {46jr °1 148 17 I ,, . - r 34to - w 367 fir' ,.�. .._•,, I 3S , siK fQ� �� � 347 Y �r \ {� �\•CbB ISg� r.-1='' r " �. � 3 [t4 m • } .� i �^ `t24•" 12I 153r1135.+, _y/�35,3.� } ,;r�X_''a "1 'a. '�" i ���_,, .. _ � �`�^,� "� Ile` � i • i'� r ' t !40 r 34 '� '' x-•ue' '1'•.'. •.. X i 'Zj$� 4�o2A, 4 14 8 .3_6 rl .. 476 145(16t7 �i'4o3/ ;� . T \, f H--'" _ I 4.: .- 4�- - 447A �.�--moo`. 2�- ; 'S S• 3�6� �$ '� - t.=" - � �-� --- _- - -- . -- -- - e E� Zif161 /,.s 446A\ �SOZ>'30I.�04- ' L- i—1498 4I i c In '�� :<�-t- �., r Vie- •� '< ' Z r%al 45 44 O/.vTERCE PT9R TE ?2AC6 U' 4 ` ' l ' . {31 g10 4 a 27 430 i404- - - - 4Br J ' 1' j- ' 4 7 r 428 40'3 4f2 297 - w 1• _ J � Q % �;-��a _.. Z84_s_.t 1�. � 474 - V 479 405 415 42, 244/ 2 : 2�O • t 9 �zz , ' ! ��/ h /• 1 �r ,% �2'. 418.— ''2114 ��• �� ,� v 283- I 414 3' 42 GdM�7]C-3'tpt'T T -_ 267 416 . �47d .� ��` A R EA OF AT�jyQOVC D a _ r \ / 44� "2?7� F fit, ` �. �• GdMP/� TEQ F . 420 244 M1Z� , .3t9 ; g49 v� 4Rj8 268 - ns � - 9-3 i 415 31 32f 1'43 ti iJ _13 � ---- ^•~=}.--_ ,ens . �u � � /, _ .. _ � -1,,,, . 3,` .. c `• ShAEET�1 OF S - -- I All LV er —OP& - _ 1 1.4 •44_ — 4 4.40 �434' 4V —f� . l�i� .-�g+i •,.� .- _-_-plygw'frv-'6sL.•t... / < • \ _.- . s•�f'l"^.'Fc"��-�' 340584 `• tea; �, .� -_ / 122 al;--- 225 32$ \ 4 434 383 �s _ 36d Z02 tg� 313� _— v t - — 727 �— -- - - 325" 14�v 364 357 3� 362 205 r i ' - • 324 195 tq$ 203 327 197 Zoi 333 190 338 194- 38Z 207 s S7 2ao 3 G5 y "93to tit �� t84 178 2tT�r_ 4 ,6 y j37 ..a - t F j / A /' R - - ' / rJ/5 06dG .AREA K. L P f. 8 ASSOCIATES — Etwi< <.uaI.urwKir(tr�C l j S __ _ '•reps �'_ _ '2 ' / . 'f ..._.........:.. p TESTS �jTG D O --------- LOCATION OF FIELD , .._......... �.. - - iri _ . - s•" ' :: $Z,. 1 MOORE 6 TABER EnQtnetrt 61o/Op sts .. r nr: r .ws TR A C. 31 _.• _ _ J y` pa*c ne N. fu �w.rr •+rvs � 2 �% t J/�N, 25, IR�3 9 5 • -6HEi'RT 3 OF-5 '�=� •adnr_." .. , _ -.. ...;:.. .rat Air ..... }+