HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/24/2021PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA
______________________________________________
August 24, 2021
6:30 PM
Diamond Bar City Hall – Windmill Community Room
21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765
PUBLIC ADVISORY:
Consistent to the Governor’s Executive Order, members of the public are encouraged to participate and
address the Planning Commission during the public comment portion of the meeting via teleconference.
Members of the Planning Commission and limited staff may be physically present for this meeting. If you
would like to attend the meeting in person, please note that face coverings are required to be worn at all
times.
_______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
How to Observe the Meeting from Home:
Members of the public can observe the meeting by calling +1 (415) 655 -0052 , Access Code: 453-910-679
or visiting https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/1319091113994114315 .
How to Submit Public Comment:
Members of the public may provide public comment by sending written comments to the Minutes Secretary by
email at Planning@DiamondBarCA.gov by 5:30 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Please indicate in the
Subject Line “FOR PUBLIC COMMENT.” Written comments will be distributed to the Planning Commission
members and read into the record at the meeting, up to a maximum of five minutes.
Public comment may be submitted by logging onto the meeting through this link: visiting
https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/1319091113994114315 . Members of the public will be called
upon one at a time during the Public Comment portion of the agenda. Speakers are limited to five minutes per
agenda item, unless the Chairperson determines otherwise.
Accommodations for Persons with Disabilities:
Pursuant to the Executive Order, and in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need
special assistance to participate in the Planning Commission Meeting, please contact the Community
Development Department at (909) 839-7030 within 72 hours of the meeting. Commission recordings will be
available upon request the day following the Planning Commission Meeting. If requested, the agenda will be
made available in an alternative format to a person with disability as required by Section 202 of the Americans
with Disabilities Act of 1990.
CHAIRPERSON WILLIAM RAWLINGS
VICE CHAIRPERSON MAHENDRA GARG
COMMISSIONER NAILA BARLAS
COMMISSIONER KENNETH MOK
COMMISSIONER RAYMOND WOLFE
City of Diamond Bar
Planning Commission
MEETING RULES
PUBLIC INPUT
Members of the public may address the Planning Commission on any item of business on the
agenda during the time the item is taken up by the Planning Commission. In addition, members
of the public may, during the Public Comment period address the Planning Commission on any
Consent Calendar item or any matter not on the agenda and within the Planning Commission’s
subject matter jurisdiction. Any material to be submitted to the Planning Commission at the
meeting should be submitted through the Minutes Secretary.
Speakers are limited to five minutes per agenda item, unless the Chairperson determines
otherwise. The Chairperson may adjust this time limit depending on the number of people
wishing to speak, the complexity of the matter, the length o f the agenda, the hour and any other
relevant consideration. Speakers may address the Planning Commission only once on an
agenda item, except during public hearings, when the applicant/appellant may be afforded a
rebuttal.
Public comments must be directed to the Planning Commission. Behavior that disrupts the
orderly conduct of the meeting may result in the speaker being removed from the meeting.
INFORMATION RELATING TO AGENDAS AND ACTIONS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Agendas for regular Planning Commission meetings are available 72 hours prior to the meeting
and are posted in the City’s regular posting locations and on the City’s website at
www.diamondbarca.gov. The Planning Commission may take action on any item listed on the
agenda.
Copies of staff reports or other written documentation relating to agenda item s are on file in the
Planning Division of the Community Development Department, located at 21810 Copley Drive,
and are available for public inspection upon request. If you have questions regardi ng an agenda
item, please call (909) 839-7030 during regular business hours.
HELPFUL CONTACT INFORMATION
Copies of Agenda, Rules of the Planning Commission, Recordings of Meetings (909) 839-7030
Email: info@diamondbarca.gov
Website: www.diamondbarca.gov
The City of Diamond Bar thanks you in advance for taking all precautions to prevent spreading the
COVID-19 virus.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
PLANNING COMMISSION
August 24, 2021
AGENDA
Next Resolution No. 2021-13
CALL TO ORDER: 6:30 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
1. ROLL CALL: COMMISSIONERS: Naila Barlas, Kenneth Mok, Raymond
Wolfe, Vice Chairperson Mahendra Garg, Chairperson William Rawlings
2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Chairperson
3. PUBLIC COMMENTS:
"Public Comments" is the time reserved on each regular meeting agenda to
provide an opportunity for members of the public to directly address the Planning
Commission on consent calendar items or other matters of interest not on the
agenda that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the council. Although the
Planning Commission values your comments, pursuant to the brown act,
members of the Planning Commission or staff may briefly respond to public
comments if necessary, but no extended discussion and no action on such
matters may take place. There is a five -minute maximum time limit when
addressing the Planning Commission. Please complete a speaker card and hand
it to the Minutes Secretary (completion of this form is voluntary). The city will call
on in person speakers first and then teleconference callers, one at a time to give
their name and if there is an agenda item number they wish to speak on before
providing their comment. If you wish to speak on a public hearin g item or
Planning Commission consideration item, you will then be called upon to speak
at that point in the agenda.
4. CONSENT CALENDAR:
The following items listed on the consent calendar are considered routine and
are approved by a single motion. Consent calendar items may be removed from
the agenda by request of the Planning Commission only:
4.1 Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting – July 27, 2021
5. OLD BUSINESS: None.
6. NEW BUSINESS:
6.1 General Plan Conformity Finding – General Plan conformity analysis of
a proposed transfer of property from the County of Los Angeles
Department of Parks and Recreation and the City of Industry to the San
Gabriel Valley Council of Governments for freeway improvement purposes
AUGUST 24, 2021 PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION
related to the 57/60 Confluence Project. After the completion of
improvements, the property will then be transferred to the California
Department of Transportation.
ENVIRONMENAL DETERMINATION: An Environmental Impact Report
prepared to analyze the impacts of the 57/6 0 Confluence Project and the
associated roadway improvements was certified in December 2013. The EIR
considered the potential impacts of the proposed roadway improvements
associated with Phase III. The acquisition of Caltrans right -of-way, and the
impacts associated with such acquisition, was described and analyzed in the
Project’s environmental documents. Because the proposed transfer of property
does not result in changes to the environment not already analyzed in the Project
EIR, no further environmental review is required. In light of this context, the
property transfer is covered by the “common sense exemption” from CEQA
[CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3)], which states, “(w)here it can be seen
with certainty that there is no possibility that the a ctivity in question may have a
significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA”.
RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. 2021-XX, finding the proposed
transfer of property from the County of Los Angeles Department of Parks and
Recreation and City of Industry for freeway improvement purposes related to the
57/60 Confluence Project to be in conformance with the Diamond Bar General
Plan.
7. PUBLIC HEARING(S):
7.1 Amendment to Conditional Use Permit (Planning Case
No. PL2021-39) - Under the authority of Diamond Bar Municipal Code
Section 22.58, the applicant is requesting to amend a previously-approved
Conditional Use Permit for a music and art school to include after -school
and tutoring programs. The applicant is requesting approval to operate a
9,904 square-foot education center with after-school, tutoring, music, and
arts programs located at Diamond Hills Plaza. The subject property is
zoned Community Commercial (C-2) with an underlying General Plan land
use designation of General Commercial.
PROJECT ADDRESS: 2751 S. Diamond Bar Blvd,
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
APPLICANT: Lance Kim, EPLEX DB, INC.
6940 Beach Blvd., #D-212
Buena Park, CA 90621
PROPERTY OWNER: ROIC Diamond Hills Plaza, LLC
11250 El Camino Real #200
San Diego, CA 92130
AUGUST 24, 2021 PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION
ENVIRONMENAL DETERMINATION: The project has been reviewed for
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on that
assessment, the City has determined the project to be Categorically Exempt from
the provisions of CEQA pursuant to Article 19 under Section 15301(a) (Interior
alterations involving partitions and electrical conveyances) of the CEQA
Guidelines. No further environmental review is required.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
approve Conditional Use Permit Amendment No. PL2021-39, based on the
findings of fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the draft
resolution.
8. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS / INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
9. STAFF COMMENTS / INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
10. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS:
11. ADJOURNMENT:
LABOR DAY HOLIDAY: Monday, September 6, 2021
In observance of the holiday, city offices will
be closed. City offices will re-open on
Tuesday, September 7, 2021.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING: Tuesday, September 7, 2021
The City Council adjourned the September 7,
2021 meeting, to September 21, 2021.
PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING:
Tuesday, September 14, 2021, 6:30 pm
Windmill Community Room
Diamond Bar City Hall, 21810 Copley Drive
CITY COUNCIL MEETING: Tuesday, September 21, 2021, 6:30 pm
Windmill Community Room
Diamond Bar City Hall, 21810 Copley Drive
PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING:
Tuesday, September 28, 2021, 6:30 pm
Windmill Community Room
Diamond Bar City Hall, 21810 Copley Drive
MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
DIAMOND BAR CITY HALL WINDMILL COMMUNITY ROOM
21810 COPLEY DRIVE, DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765
JULY 27, 2021
CALL TO ORDER:
Chair/Rawlings called the meeting to order at 6:31 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Commissioner Mok led the Pledge of Allegiance.
1. ROLL CALL: Commissioners: Naila Barlas, Kenneth Mok, Raymond
Wolfe, Vice Chairman Mahendra Garg, Chairman William
Rawlings
Staff Present : Greg Gubman, Community Development Director; James Eggart,
Assistant City Attorney; Grace Lee, Senior Planner; Mayuko (May) Nakajima, Associate
Planner; Joy Tsai, Assistant Planner; Stella Marquez, Administrative Coordinator.
2. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: None Offered.
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: As presented
4. CONSENT CALENDAR:
4.1 Minutes of the Regular Planning Commission Meeting of July 13, 2021.
C/Barlas moved, C/Mok seconded, to approve Consent Calendar as presented.
Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Barlas, Mok, Wolfe, Chair/Rawlings
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: VC/Garg
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None
5. OLD BUSINESS:
5.1 Conditional Use Permit Planning Case No. PL2021-18 – On June 22, 2021,
after closing the public hearing, the Planning Commission directed staff to
prepare a Resolution to deny the applicant’s request to establish a medical
laboratory.
PROJECT ADDRESS: 3333 Diamond Canyon Road, Suite 100
Diamond Bar, CA 91789
4.1
Packet Pg. 6
________________________________________________________________________
JULY 27, 2021 PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION
________________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT: Jordan Wang for Innova Biolab
1977 N. Garey Avenue
Pomona, CA 91767
OWNER: Teresa Cheung
1142 S. Diamond Bar Boulevard #423
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
AP/Nakajima presented staffs report and recommended that the Planning
Commission adopt a resolution denying Conditional Use Permit PL2021-18.
VC/Garg moved, C/Wolfe seconded, to adopt the resolution denying Conditional
Use Permit No. PL2021-18.
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Mok, Wolfe, VC/Garg
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Barlas, Chair/Rawlings
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None
6. NEW BUSINESS: None
7. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING(S):
7.1 Conditional Use Permit Planning Case No. PL2021-19 – Under the authority
of Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.58, the applicant, Steve Lee,
requested Conditional Use Permit approval to operate a fitness studio in a 3,966
square-foot lease space located at Golden Springs Plaza. The subject pr operty
is zoned Regional Commercial (C-3) with an underlying General Plan land use
designation of General Commercial.
PROJECT ADDRESS: 20657 Golden Springs Drive, Suite 111A
Diamond Bar, CA 91789
APPLICANT: Steve Lee
3935 Landmark Lane
Brea, CA 92823
PROPERTY OWNER: Golden Springs Asset LLC
20657 Golden Springs Drive, Suite 201
Diamond Bar, CA 91789
AP/Tsai presented staff’s report and recommended the Planning Commission
approve Conditional Use Permit No. PL2021-19, based on the findings of fact,
and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the resolution.
4.1
Packet Pg. 7
________________________________________________________________________
JULY 27, 2021 PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION
________________________________________________________________________
C/Wolfe said he appreciated the research related to sound transmission
requirements for vertical partitions, the fact that there will be a ¾ inch rubber mat
on the floor and liked the wording of Condition No. 4. He commented that in his
opinion, consideration should also be given to sound at the top of the walls
transmitting through attic space to other businesses when considering these
types of CUPs.
C/Mok thanked AP/Tsai for her research and complete presentation which
addressed all of his concerns. He was very happy to read on Page 2 of the report
that there will not be any group classes, liked hearing about the potential use of
earphones and forbidding the dropping of weights and dumbbells, the ¾-inch-
thick floor pad mentioned by C/Wolfe, the 1-¾ inch solid wood rear door, the
sound transmission class of 45 to 49, and the indication that the City has the
ability to address complaints about noise, parking, etc.
C/Barlas thanked AP/Tsai for her presentation. She asked if Condition No. 4
would also address complaints from neighboring residents. CDD/Gubman
responded that staff would respond to any complaints that come to the City.
While it will be very difficult for staff to actively enforce the condition, if it is a
nuisance complaint, staff will look into the matter.
Chair/Rawlings reopened the public hearing.
With no one wishing to speak on this item, Chair/Rawlings closed the public
hearing.
C/Mok moved, VC/Garg seconded, to approve Conditional Use Permit
No. PL2021-19, based on the findings of fact, and subject to the conditions of
approval as listed within the resolution. Motion carried by the following Roll Call
vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Barlas, Mok, Wolfe, VC/Garg,
Chair/Rawlings
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None
8. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
Chair/Rawlings commented that he hoped STC (Sound Transmission Class) would be
considered for other projects including veterinary hospitals, etc.
4.1
Packet Pg. 8
________________________________________________________________________
JULY 27, 2021 PAGE 4 PLANNING COMMISSION
________________________________________________________________________
9. STAFF COMMENTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
CDD/Gubman announced that with no business pending, there will be no Planning
Commission meeting on August 10th. There are items under consideration for the
August 24th agenda, which will be the next meeting date.
10. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS:
As listed in the agenda.
ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Planning Commission,
Chair/Rawlings adjourned the regular meeting at 6:50 p.m. to August 24, 2021, at 6:30 p.m.
The foregoing minutes are hereby approved this ____________________________, 2021.
Attest:
Respectfully Submitted,
_______________________________________
Greg Gubman, Community Development Director
______________________________
William Rawlings, Chairperson
4.1
Packet Pg. 9
PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 6.1
MEETING DATE: August 24, 2021
CASE/FILE NUMBER: PL2021-66
SUBJECT:
General Plan conformity analysis of a proposed
transfer of property from the County of Los
Angeles Department of Parks and Recreation
and the City of Industry to the San Gabriel Valley
Council of Governments for freeway
improvement purposes related to the 57/60
Confluence Project. After the completion of
improvements, the property will then be
transferred to the California Department of
Transportation.
BACKGROUND:
State Route 57 (SR-57) and State Route 60 (SR-60) converge along a two-mile
segment that runs alongside the County-owned Diamond Bar Golf Course. This
segment is referred to as the “57/60 Confluence.” The Cali fornia Department of
Transportation (Caltrans) identified the 57/60 Confluence as one of the five most
congested segments within Caltrans District 7, an area which encompasses Los
Angeles and Ventura Counties. The 57/60 Confluence Project (“Project”), deve loped by
the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro), the cities of
Industry and Diamond Bar, and the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments
(SGVCOG), in cooperation with Caltrans, is a three-phase program of improvements
consisting of ramp and interchange reconfigurations, as well as the addition of lanes to
improve congestion and minimize accidents. Implementation of the Project requires the
acquisition of right-of-way to accommodate certain roadway reconfigurations and
freeway improvements, and conveyance of the right-of-way and infrastructure to
Caltrans.
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65402(a) (Attachment 2), before real
property may be acquired for a public purpose, the proposed acquisition must be
reviewed for conformity with the general plan of the jurisdiction in which the land is
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ~ 21810 COPLEY DRIVE ~ DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 ~ TEL. (909) 839-7030 ~ FAX (909) 861-3117
6.1
Packet Pg. 10
PL2021-66 Page 2 of 4
located.1 Because the property in question is located within Diamond Bar, this
conformity determination falls to the Planning Commission.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The 57/60 Confluence Project is being implemented in several phases: Phases I, IIA,
IIB, and III. To complete the Phase III freeway improvements, portion s of the Diamond
Bar Golf Course property and slopes owned by the City of Industry must be acquired.
Phase III consists of the following improvements on Grand Avenue and the SR-57 and
SR-60 freeway ramps:
• Reconstruct the Grand Avenue overcrossing;
• Reconfigure the ramps at Grand Avenue;
• Extend a through lane on northbound SR-57;
• Construct an eastbound SR-60 bypass off ramp to Grand Avenue; and
• Construct an eastbound bypass connector from Grand Avenue to SR -60.
The exhibit on the following page illustrates the properties to be acquired. A portion of
the Diamond Bar Golf Course property owned by the County of Los Angeles
Department of Parks and Recreation is approximately 9.13 acres (shown in peach). The
slope areas on the west and east side of Grand Avenue owned by the City of Industry
are approximately 0.207 acres (shown in blue). On behalf of Metro, the SGVCOG must
first acquire these properties. Upon completion of the freeway improvements, the
SGVCOG will convey both County and City properties to Caltrans, which will ultimately
take title and maintain the freeway infrastructure.
1 Similarly, publicly owned real property may not be disposed of until a determination of general plan
consistency is made. In this case, both criteria apply: Los Angeles County, a public agency, is the
current owner of the property that is intended to be used for another public purpose.
Phases of the 57/60 Confluence Project
6.1
Packet Pg. 11
PL2021-66 Page 3 of 4
Freeway Improvement Exhibit
ANALYSIS:
The transfer of these properties to the SGVCOG and then to Caltrans has been
reviewed for conformity with the General Plan. Staff finds that the proposed transfer of
properties is consistent with the following General Plan Goals and Policies:
Circulation Element
• Goal CR-G-7: Ensure smooth traffic flows by maintaining or improving traffic
levels of service (LOS) that balance operational efficiency, technological and
economic feasibility, and safety.
• Goal CR-G-9: Create and maintain programs for funding transportation
improvements, with fair and equitable sharing of transportation improvement
costs.
• Policy CR-P-7: Maintain roadway design standards to manage vehicle speeds
and traffic volumes, updating them as needed.
• Policy CR-P-18: Prioritize and phase improvements through the City’s Capital
Improvements Program process as development proceeds, given the extended
time frame of General Plan implementation.
6.1
Packet Pg. 12
PL2021-66 Page 4 of 4
• Policy CR-P-26: As opportunities arise, coordinate with other jurisdictions,
including neighboring cities, Los Angeles County, San Bernardino County, and
Caltrans, on improvements to street segments common to the City of Diamond
Bar and other jurisdictions.
• Policy CR-P-29: Solicit State and Federal funds to improve area freeways and
local streets.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
An Environmental Impact Report prepared to analyze the impacts of the 57/60
Confluence Project and the associated roadway improvements was certified in
December 2013. The EIR considered the potential impacts of the proposed ro adway
improvements associated with Phase III. The acquisition of Caltrans right-of-way, and
the impacts associated with such acquisition, was described and analyzed in the
Project’s environmental documents. Because the proposed transfer of property does
not result in changes to the environment not already analyzed in the Project EIR, no
further environmental review is required. In light of this context, the property transfer is
covered by the “common sense exemption” from CEQA [CEQA Guidelines
Section 15061(b)(3)], which states, “(w)here it can be seen with certainty that there is no
possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment,
the activity is not subject to CEQA”.
PREPARED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
Attachments:
A. Draft Resolution No. 2021-XX
B. California Government Code Section 65402A
6.1
Packet Pg. 13
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR,
CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT THE PROPOSED TRANSFER OF PROPERTY FROM THE
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION TO
ACCOMMODATE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS RELATED TO THE 57/60 CONFLUENCE
PROJECT IS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF
DIAMOND BAR PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65402(A).
A. RECITALS
(i)WHEREAS, on April 18, 1989, the City of Diamond Bar was established as a duly
organized municipal corporation of the State of California;
(ii)WHEREAS, on July 25, 1995, the City of Diamond Bar adopted its General Plan
incorporating all State mandated elements;
(iii)WHEREAS, on December 17, 2019, the City of Diamond Bar adopted its
Comprehensive General Plan Update incorporating all State mandated elements;
(iv)WHEREAS, the 57/60 Confluence Project was created in collaboration with
Caltrans, the cities of Industry and Diamond Bar, which is a three-phase program
of improvements consisting of ramp and interchange reconfigurations as well as
the addition of lanes to improve congestion and minimize accidents;
(v)WHEREAS, a portion of the Diamond Bar Golf Course property owned by the
County of Los Angeles Department of Parks and Recreation and the slope areas
on the west and east side of Grand Avenue owned by the City of Industry must
be transferred to San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments to complete the
freeway improvements for Phase III of the 57/60 Confluence Project;
(vi)WHEREAS, the area of the Diamond Bar Golf Course to be transferred for the
57/60 Confluence Project is approximately 9.13 acres and the area of the slopes
on either side of Grand Avenue is approximately 0.207 acres, as shown in the
attached Exhibits A;
(vii)WHEREAS, upon completion of the freeway improvements, the San Gabriel
Valley Council of Governments will convey both County and City properties to the
State of California Department of Transportation;
(viii)WHEREAS, Section 65402(a) of the Government Code of the State of California
requires that no street shall be acquired by dedication or otherwise for street,
square, park or other public purposes until the location, purpose and extent has
been submitted to and reported upon by the planning agency of the City as to
conformity with adopted General Plan or part thereof; and
(ix)WHEREAS, on August, 24, 2021, at a regularly scheduled meeting, the Planning
Commission, considered the matter of the proposed transfer of property from the
County of Los Angeles Department of Parks and Recreation to accommodate
freeway improvements related to the 57/60 Confluence Project to be in
conformance with the Diamond Bar General Plan, and concluded said review
prior to the adoption of this Resolution.
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 14
2
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND
BAR DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
1. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in
the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The Planning Commission hereby finds that the proposed transfer of property is in
conformance with the adopted General Plan of the City of Diamond Bar as follows:
Circulation Element
(a) Goal CR-G-7 states: Ensure smooth traffic flows by maintaining or improving
traffic levels of service (LOS) that balance operational efficiency, technological
and economic feasibility, and safety.
The Project will support an operational flexibility to the two merged freeways
and improve LOS in the 57/60 Confluence from an “F” to a “C” or better.
(b) Goal CR-G-9 states: Create and maintain programs for funding transportation
improvements, with fair and equitable sharing of transportation improvement
costs.
Phase III is the construction of $256 million freeway improvements and is fully
funded with a $217 million grant from the State of California and a $30M grant
from the U.S. Department of Transportation Infrastructure for Rebuilding
America (INFA) program.
(c) Policy CR-P-7 states: Maintain roadway design standards to manage vehicle
speeds and traffic volumes, updating them as needed.
The Project will provide an improvement to the freeway by relieving congestion
and minimize accidents.
(d) Policy CR-P-18 states: Prioritize and phase improvements through the City’s
Capital Improvements Program process as development proceeds, given the
extended time frame of General Plan implementation.
The 57/60 Confluence Project is a three-phase program of improvements
consisting of ramp and interchange reconfigurations as well as the addition of
auxiliary collector/distributor and bypass lanes to significantly reduce the
weaving and the resulting congestion and accidents. Phase III of the Project
includes reconstructing the Grand Avenue overcrossing, reconfiguring the
ramps at Grand Avenue, extending a through lane on northbound SR-57,
constructing an eastbound SR-60 bypass off ramp to Grand Avenue and
constructing an eastbound by pass connector from Grand Avenue to SR-60.
(e) Policy CR-P-26 states: As opportunities arise, coordinate with other
jurisdictions, including neighboring cities, Los Angeles County, San Bernardino
County, and Caltrans, on improvements to street segments common to the City
of Diamond Bar and other jurisdictions.
The City is working in collaboration with the City of Industry and Caltrans to
improve traffic operations and safety on SR-57 and SR-60 at the Grand Avenue
interchange.
(f) Policy CR-P-29 states: Solicit State and Federal funds to improve area
freeways and local streets.
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 15
3
The $256 million project will be constructed in three phases with a combination
of local, county and federal funding sources.
3. The Planning Commission hereby finds that the property transfer is covered by the
“common sense exemption” from CEQA [CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3)],
which states, “(w)here it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that
the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity
is not subject to CEQA.”
4. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth above, this Resolution shall serve
as the Planning Commission’s finding regarding the General Plan conformity of the
proposed transfer of property from the County of Los Angeles Department of Parks
and Recreation and City of Industry to accommodate freeway improvements
related to the 57/60 Confluence Project, as required by California Government
Code Section 65402(a).
The Planning Commission shall:
(a) Certify as to the adoption of this Resolution; and
(b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution to Lee Barocas, Planning
and Development Agency, County of Los Angeles Department of Parks and
Recreation, 1000 S. Fremont Avenue, Building A-9 West, 3rd Floor - Unit #40,
Alhambra, California 91803, and Joshua Nelson, PE, Director of Public
Works/City Engineer, 15625 E. Stafford Street, City of Industry, CA 91744.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021, BY THE PLANNING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR.
BY: __________________________________
William Rawlings, Chairperson
I, Greg Gubman, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Diamond Bar, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of
August, 2021, by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners:
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST: __________________________________
Greg Gubman, Secretary
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 16
Recorded at the request of
San Gabriel Valley Council of
Governments
When Recorded Mail to:
SGVCOG
4900 Rivergrade Rd, Ste. A120
Irwindale, CA 91706
Space above this line for Recorder's Use
This document is recorded for the benefit of the San Gabriel Valley
Council of Governments is therefore exempt from the payment of the
recording fee pursuant to Government code Section 6103 and from
the payment of the documentary transfer tax pursuant to Revenue and
Taxation Code Section 11922.
GRANT DEED
Parcel Number: 81468-1 Assessor's Parcel No: 8717-002-905 and 8717-002-906
County of Los Angeles,
Hereinafter called GRANTOR, hereby grants and dedicates in fee for public purposes to the San
Gabriel Valley Council of Governments its successors and assigns, herein after called GRANTEE,
all that real property in the City of Diamond Bar, County of Los Angeles, State of California,
described on Exhibit “A” and shown on Exhibit “B” attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference.
This conveyance is made for the purposes of a freeway and adjacent frontage road and the
GRANTOR hereby releases and relinquishes to GRANTEE any and all abutter’s rights including
access rights appurtenant to GRANTOR’s remaining property, in and to the freeway, provided,
however, that such remaining property shall abut upon and have access to the frontage road which
will be connected to the freeway only at such points as may be established by public authority.
The GRANTOR further understands that the present intention of GRANTEE is to construct and
maintain a public highway on the lands hereby conveyed and the GRANTOR, for itself and its
successors and assigns, hereby waive any and all claims for damages to GRANTOR’s remaining
property contiguous to the property hereby conveyed by reason of the location, construction,
landscaping or maintenance of the highway.
District County Route Postmile Number
7 LA 60 LA R24.457 81468-1
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 17
Dated this day of , 20______.
“GRANTOR”
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES AND COUNTY
OF LOS ANGELES, A BODY CORPORATE
AND POLITIC
By: _______________________________
Its: _______________________________
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 18
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California )
) ss
County of ___________ )
On before me,_______________________________________, a
(Name of Notary)
Notary Public, personally appeared ______________________________________________
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same
in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the
person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
(Notary Signature)
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate
verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the
document to which this certificate is attached, and not the
truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 19
Page 1 of 6
EXHIBIT “A”
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PARCEL 81468-1
THAT PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND IN THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 9
AND THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, BOTH IN TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE
9 WEST, S.B.M., IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, AS DESCRIBED IN THE DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1970 AS
INSTRUMENT NO. 3839, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, AND PARCELS 2 AND 3 AS DESCRIBED IN
THE DIRECTOR’S DEED RECORDED AUGUST 27, 1987 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 87-1378454,
OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, BOTH IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID
COUNTY, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
PARCEL A
COMMENCING AT THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF GRAND AVENUE AND GOLDEN
SPRINGS DRIVE AS SHOWN ON THE MAP FILED IN BOOK 326, PAGES 1 THROUGH 10, OF
RECORDS OF SURVEYS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY,
SAID POINT BEING ON A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF
2,999.93 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 57°26'52" WEST;
THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID GRAND AVENUE AND SAID
CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09°47'51", AN ARC LENGTH OF 512.99 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF GRAND AVENUE NORTH 22°45'17"
WEST, 174.25 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID CENTERLINE OF GRAND AVENUE NORTH 67°14'43" EAST, 55.15
FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID
GRAND AVENUE PER DOCUMENT RECORDED JULY 31, 1974 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 3613,
OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, AND THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL C PER QUITCLAIM
DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 24, 2020 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 20201726888, OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS, BOTH IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, SAID
POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS DESCRIPTION;
THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GRAND AVENUE PER
INSTRUMENT NO. 3613 AND ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL C NORTH
67°23'00" EAST, 29.42 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE
EASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,131.75 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID BEGINNING OF
CURVE BEARS SOUTH 73°44'11" WEST;
THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL C AND NORTHERLY ALONG
SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03°38'08" AN ARC LENGTH OF 135.26 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 05°07'56" WEST, 104.35 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 11°30'44" WEST, 169.41 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY
LINE OF STATE ROUTES 57 AND 60 PER THE GRANT DEED RECORDED AUGUST 27, 1987
AS INSTRUMENT NO. 87-1378453, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE
COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, SAID POINT HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS
POINT ‘A’;
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 20
Page 2 of 6
THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE STATE ROUTES
PER INSTRUMENT NO. 87-1378453 THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES:
SOUTH 21°17'54" WEST, 22.49 FEET;
SOUTH 10°13'51" EAST, 25.99 FEET;
SOUTH 77°47'23" WEST, 48.26 FEET TO SAID NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF
GRAND AVENUE PER INSTRUMENT NO. 3613, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A
NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,949.93 FEET, A
RADIAL LINE TO SAID BEGINNING OF CURVE BEARS SOUTH 77°48'39" WEST;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GRAND
AVENUE PER INSTRUMENT NO. 3613 AND ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 07°10'45" AN ARC LENGTH OF 369.63 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING
OF THIS DESCRIPTION.
PARCEL B
COMMENCING AT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POINT ‘A’;
THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE STATE ROUTES
PER INSTRUMENT NO. 87-1378453 NORTH 21°17'54" EAST, 119.88 FEET TO THE TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS DESCRIPTION;
THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE STATE ROUTES
PER INSTRUMENT NO. 87-1378453 NORTH 35°18'32" EAST, 55.40 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 54°41'28" EAST, 1.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 35°18'32" EAST, 4.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 54°41'28" WEST, 1.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 35°18'32" EAST, 52.14 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 38°10'16" EAST, 146.93 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE,
CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 4,537.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
04°03'54" AN ARC LENGTH OF 321.89 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 34°06'22" EAST, 52.66 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 79°06'22" EAST, 16.97 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 34°06'22" EAST, 40.14 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 32°11'49" EAST, 61.78 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 29°20'04" EAST, 27.07 FEET;
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 21
Page 3 of 6
THENCE SOUTH 60°39'56" EAST, 7.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 29°20'04" EAST, 8.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 60°39'56" WEST, 7.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 29°20'04" EAST, 106.39 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE,
CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 5,120.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
01°06'18" AN ARC LENGTH OF 98.75 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT
CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 5,122.40 FEET, A RADIAL LINE
TO SAID BEGINNING OF CURVE BEARS NORTH 56°41'45" WEST;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
00°38'49" AN ARC LENGTH OF 57.84 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT
CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 5,125.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE
TO SAID BEGINNING OF CURVE BEARS NORTH 54°07'49" WEST;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
00°05'53" AN ARC LENGTH OF 8.78 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 35°58'05" EAST, 245.05 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 54°01'55" EAST, 1.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 35°58'05" EAST, 54.37 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT
CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 20,117.50 FEET, A RADIAL
LINE TO SAID BEGINNING OF CURVE BEARS SOUTH 54°28'08" EAST;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
00°28'27" AN ARC LENGTH OF 166.49 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT
CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 10,127.50 FEET, A RADIAL
LINE TO SAID BEGINNING OF CURVE BEARS SOUTH 54°58'05" EAST;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
00°03'02" AN ARC LENGTH OF 8.95 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 64°16'24" EAST, 35.32 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 25°53'38" WEST, 19.89 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 34°50'16" EAST, 7.09 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT
CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 10,127.50 FEET, A RADIAL
LINE TO SAID BEGINNING OF CURVE BEARS SOUTH 55°17'16" EAST;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
02°09'58" AN ARC LENGTH OF 382.88 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT
CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 10,123.07 FEET, A RADIAL
LINE TO SAID BEGINNING OF CURVE BEARS SOUTH 56°19'32" EAST;
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 22
Page 4 of 6
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
00°06'03" AN ARC LENGTH OF 17.82 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 56°26'53" EAST, 6.75 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT
CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 10,129.75 FEET, A RADIAL
LINE TO SAID BEGINNING OF CURVE BEARS SOUTH 56°25'35" EAST;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
00°03'24" AN ARC LENGTH OF 10.02 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 56°26'53" WEST, 6.75 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT
CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 10,123.00 FEET, A RADIAL
LINE TO SAID BEGINNING OF CURVE BEARS SOUTH 56°28'59" EAST;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
01°23'27" AN ARC LENGTH OF 245.73 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 32°07'34" EAST, 530.36 FEET TO SAID SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY
LINE OF THE STATE ROUTES PER INSTRUMENT NO. 87-1378453;
THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE STATE ROUTES
PER INSTRUMENT NO. 87-1378453 THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES:
SOUTH 34°39'12" WEST, 216.84 FEET;
SOUTH 32°06'30" WEST, 307.14 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE,
CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 10,112.76 FEET;
SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02°53'37" AN
ARC LENGTH OF 510.70 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF STATE
ROUTES 57 AND 60 PER SAID INSTRUMENT NO. 87-1378454;
THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE STATE ROUTES
PER INSTRUMENT NO. 87-1378453 AND ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY
LINE OF THE STATE ROUTES PER INSTRUMENT NO. 87-1378454 THE FOLLOWING FOUR
(4) COURSES:
CONTINUING SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
01°17'08" AN ARC LENGTH OF 226.92 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT
CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 9,999.78 FEET, A RADIAL
LINE TO SAID BEGINNING OF CURVE BEARS SOUTH 55°14'30" EAST;
SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00°00'41" AN
ARC LENGTH OF 1.99 FEET;
NORTH 55°18'50" WEST, 2.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE,
CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 9,997.77 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO
SAID BEGINNING OF CURVE BEARS SOUTH 55°18'51" EAST;
SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00°41'33" AN
ARC LENGTH OF 120.84 FEET TO SAID SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE
STATE ROUTES PER INSTRUMENT NO. 87-1378453;
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 23
Page 5 of 6
THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE STATE ROUTES
PER INSTRUMENT NO. 87-1378454 AND ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY
LINE OF THE STATE ROUTES PER INSTRUMENT NO. 87-1378453 THE FOLLOWING TWO (2)
COURSES:
CONTINUING SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID LAST MENTIONED CURVE THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01°45'39" AN ARC LENGTH OF 307.26 FEET;
NON-TANGENT TO SAID LAST MENTIONED CURVE SOUTH 38°58'54" WEST, 169.53 FEET
TO SAID SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE STATE ROUTES PER
INSTRUMENT NO. 87-1378454;
THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE STATE ROUTES
PER INSTRUMENT NO. 87-1378453 AND ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY
LINE OF THE STATE ROUTES PER INSTRUMENT NO. 87-1378454 THE FOLLOWING THREE
(3) COURSES:
SOUTH 38°58'54" WEST, 223.51 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE,
CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 3,001.93 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO
SAID BEGINNING OF CURVE BEARS NORTH 51°15'44" WEST;
SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 04°15'57" AN
ARC LENGTH OF 223.50 FEET;
NON-TANGENT TO SAID LAST MENTIONED CURVE SOUTH 29°35'41" WEST, 54.04 FEET TO
SAID SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE STATE ROUTES PER INSTRUMENT
NO. 87-1378453;
THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE STATE ROUTES
PER INSTRUMENT NO. 87-1378454 AND ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY
LINE OF THE STATE ROUTES PER INSTRUMENT NO. 87-1378453 THE FOLLOWING SIX (6)
COURSES:
CONTINUING SOUTH 29°35'41" WEST, 119.54 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-
TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,947.93 FEET, A
RADIAL LINE TO SAID BEGINNING OF CURVE BEARS NORTH 58°27'09" WEST;
SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03°19'23" AN
ARC LENGTH OF 170.97 FEET;
SOUTH 28°13'28" WEST, 40.13 FEET;
SOUTH 21°17'54" WEST, 65.73 FEET;
SOUTH 68°42'06" EAST, 2.00 FEET;
SOUTH 21°17'54" WEST, 8.10 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS
DESCRIPTION.
THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL 81468-1 CONTAINS A GRID AREA 92,200 SQUARE FEET
OR 2.116 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 24
Page 6 of 6
THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES USED IN THE ABOVE DESCRIPTION ARE CALIFORNIA
COORDINATE SYSTEM (CCS83), ZONE V, NAD 83 (1991.35 EPOCH), ALL DISTANCES
SHOWN ARE GRID, TO OBTAIN GROUND DISTANCES DIVIDE BY 0.99997653.
ALL AS MORE PARTICULARLY SHOWN ON EXHIBIT “B”, ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A
PART HEREOF.
THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DIRECTION, IN
CONFORMANCE WITH THE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR’S ACT.
__________________________________________________ ________________________
TIMOTHY S. FETTIG P.L.S. 7542 DATE
5/25/21
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 25
6.1.aPacket Pg. 26
6.1.aPacket Pg. 27
6.1.aPacket Pg. 28
6.1.aPacket Pg. 29
6.1.aPacket Pg. 30
6.1.aPacket Pg. 31
6.1.aPacket Pg. 32
Recorded at the request of
San Gabriel Valley Council of
Governments
When Recorded Mail to:
SGVCOG
4900 Rivergrade Rd, Ste. A120
Irwindale, CA 91706
Space above this line for Recorder's Use
This document is recorded for the benefit of the San Gabriel Valley
Council of Governments is therefore exempt from the payment of the
recording fee pursuant to Government code Section 6103 and from
the payment of the documentary transfer tax pursuant to Revenue and
Taxation Code Section 11922.
GRANT DEED
Parcel Number: 81466-1 Assessor's Parcel No: 8717-001-907 and 8717-001-908
County of Los Angeles,
Hereinafter called GRANTOR, hereby grants and dedicates in fee for public purposes to the San
Gabriel Valley Council of Governments its successors and assigns, herein after called GRANTEE,
all that real property in the City of Diamond Bar, County of Los Angeles, State of California,
described on Exhibit “A” and shown on Exhibit “B” attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference.
This conveyance is made for the purposes of a freeway and adjacent frontage road and the
GRANTOR hereby releases and relinquishes to GRANTEE any and all abutter’s rights including
access rights appurtenant to GRANTOR’s remaining property, in and to the freeway, provided,
however, that such remaining property shall abut upon and have access to the frontage road which
will be connected to the freeway only at such points as may be established by public authority.
The GRANTOR further understands that the present intention of GRANTEE is to construct and
maintain a public highway on the lands hereby conveyed and the GRANTOR, for itself and its
successors and assigns, hereby waive any and all claims for damages to GRANTOR’s remaining
property contiguous to the property hereby conveyed by reason of the location, construction,
landscaping or maintenance of the highway.
District County Route Postmile Number
7 LA 60 LA R24.343 81466-1
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 33
Dated this day of , 20______.
“GRANTOR”
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES AND COUNTY
OF LOS ANGELES, A BODY CORPORATE
AND POLITIC
By: _______________________________
Its: _______________________________
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 34
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California )
) ss
County of ___________ )
On before me,_______________________________________, a
(Name of Notary)
Notary Public, personally appeared ______________________________________________
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same
in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the
person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
(Notary Signature)
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate
verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the
document to which this certificate is attached, and not the
truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 35
Page 1 of 4
EXHIBIT “A”
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PARCEL 81466-1
THAT PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF
SECTION 9 AND THE NORTH HALF OF SECTION 16, BOTH IN TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE
9 WEST, S.B.M., IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, AS DESCRIBED IN THE DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1970 AS
INSTRUMENT NO. 3839, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, AND THAT PORTION OF PARCEL 1 AS
DESCRIBED IN THE DIRECTOR’S DEED RECORDED AUGUST 27, 1987 AS INSTRUMENT
NO. 87-1378454, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, BOTH IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF GRAND AVENUE AND GOLDEN
SPRINGS DRIVE AS SHOWN ON THE MAP FILED IN BOOK 326, PAGES 1 THROUGH 10, OF
RECORDS OF SURVEYS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY,
SAID POINT BEING ON A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF
2,999.93 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 57°26'52" WEST;
THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID GRAND AVENUE AND SAID
CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09°47'51", AN ARC LENGTH OF 512.99 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF GRAND AVENUE NORTH 22°45'17"
WEST, 160.70 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID CENTERLINE OF GRAND AVENUE SOUTH 67°14'43" WEST, 64.96
FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID
GRAND AVENUE PER QUITCLAIM DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 24, 2020 AS INSTRUMENT
NO. 20201726887, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, AND THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL
D PER QUITCLAIM DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 24, 2020 AS INSTRUMENT NO.
20201726888, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, BOTH IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER
OF SAID COUNTY, SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GRAND AVENUE PER
INSTRUMENT NO. 20201726887 AND ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL D
SOUTH 67°23'00" WEST, 65.00 FEET TO THE GENERALLY WESTERLY LINE OF SAID
PARCEL D;
THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL D AND ALONG SAID
GENERALLY WESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL D SOUTH 02°05'50" EAST, 84.89 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID GENERALLY WESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL D SOUTH 67°55'26"
WEST, 336.37 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 22°04'34" EAST, 10.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 67°55'26" WEST, 10.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 22°04'34" WEST, 10.00 FEET;
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 36
Page 2 of 4
THENCE SOUTH 67°55'26" WEST, 207.91 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT
CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,096.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE
TO SAID BEGINNING OF CURVE BEARS NORTH 23°39'09" WEST;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
09°39'22" AN ARC LENGTH OF 184.71 FEET;
THENCE ALONG A LINE RADIAL TO SAID LAST MENTIONED CURVE SOUTH 33°18'31" EAST,
1.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY,
HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,095.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID BEGINNING OF CURVE
BEARS NORTH 33°18'31" WEST;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
00°12'33" AN ARC LENGTH OF 4.00 FEET;
THENCE ALONG A LINE RADIAL TO SAID LAST MENTIONED CURVE NORTH 33°31'04"
WEST, 1.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE
SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,096.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID
BEGINNING OF CURVE BEARS NORTH 33°31'04" WEST;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
08°02'50" AN ARC LENGTH OF 153.93 FEET;
THENCE NON-TANGENT TO SAID LAST MENTIONED CURVE SOUTH 47°31'13" WEST,
346.04 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 39°46'37" WEST, 100.20 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 47°31'13" WEST, 899.60 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE,
CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 5,551.50 FEET;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
03°37'54" AN ARC LENGTH OF 351.88 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID
PARCEL 1;
THENCE NON-TANGENT TO SAID LAST MENTIONED CURVE AND ALONG SAID
SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL 1 NORTH 42°55'55" WEST, 15.89 FEET TO THE
SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF STATE ROUTES 57 AND 60 PER SAID
INSTRUMENT NO. 87-1378454;
THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL 1 AND ALONG SAID
SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE STATE ROUTES PER INSTRUMENT NO. 87-
1378454 THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES:
NORTH 45°02'28" EAST, 339.08 FEET;
NORTH 47°38'12" EAST, 463.08 FEET;
NORTH 47°16'33" EAST, 128.83 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF
STATE ROUTES 57 AND 60 PER THE GRANT DEED RECORDED APRIL 8, 2004 AS
INSTRUMENT NO. 04-0844506, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY;
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 37
Page 3 of 4
THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE STATE ROUTES
PER INSTRUMENT NO. 87-1378454 AND ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY
LINE OF THE STATE ROUTES PER INSTRUMENT NO. 04-0844506 THE FOLLOWING SIX (6)
COURSES:
NORTH 46°38'06" EAST, 314.79 FEET;
NORTH 44°52'06" WEST, 10.50 FEET;
NORTH 44°39'57" EAST, 701.30 FEET;
NORTH 45°34'35" EAST, 109.23 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE,
CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,838.78 FEET;
NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06°34'50" AN
ARC LENGTH OF 211.19 FEET;
NORTH 38°59'45" EAST, 129.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF
STATE ROUTES 57 AND 60 PER THE GRANT DEED RECORDED AUGUST 27, 1987 AS
INSTRUMENT NO. 87-1378453, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY;
THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE STATE ROUTES
PER INSTRUMENT NO. 04-0844506 AND ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY
LINE OF THE STATE ROUTES PER INSTRUMENT NO. 87-1378453 THE FOLLOWING FIVE (5)
COURSES:
NORTH 48°30'49" EAST, 65.06 FEET;
NORTH 18°26'16" EAST, 36.92 FEET;
NORTH 45°04'33" EAST, 180.00 FEET;
SOUTH 87°01'00" EAST, 41.82 FEET;
NORTH 48°30'49" EAST, 83.53 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF
GRAND AVENUE PER THE ROAD DEED RECORDED NOVEMBER 5, 1963 AS INSTRUMENT
NO. 4796, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID
COUNTY, SAID POINT BEING ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY,
HAVING A RADIUS OF 549.99 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT ON CURVE BEARS
NORTH 53°08'28" EAST;
THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE STATE ROUTES
PER INSTRUMENT NO. 87-1378453 AND SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GRAND AVENUE PER INSTRUMENT NO. 4796 AND ALONG SAID
CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14°05'04" AN ARC LENGTH OF 135.20 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GRAND
AVENUE PER INSTRUMENT NO. 4796 SOUTH 22°46'28" EAST, 200.55 FEET TO SAID
SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GRAND AVENUE PER INSTRUMENT NO.
20201726887;
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 38
Page 4 of 4
THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GRAND AVENUE PER
INSTRUMENT NO. 4796 AND ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF
GRAND AVENUE PER INSTRUMENT NO. 20201726887 SOUTH 73°12'19" WEST, 14.10 FEET
TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY, HAVING A
RADIUS OF 2,279.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID BEGINNING OF CURVE BEARS SOUTH
73°12'19" WEST;
THENCE CONTINUING SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE
OF GRAND AVENUE PER INSTRUMENT NO. 20201726887 AND ALONG SAID CURVE
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00°13'50" AN ARC LENGTH OF 9.18 FEET TO THE TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINS A GRID AREA 305,514 SQUARE FEET OR
7.014 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES USED IN THE ABOVE DESCRIPTION ARE CALIFORNIA
COORDINATE SYSTEM (CCS83), ZONE V, NAD 83 (1991.35 EPOCH), ALL DISTANCES
SHOWN ARE GRID, TO OBTAIN GROUND DISTANCES DIVIDE BY 0.99997653.
ALL AS MORE PARTICULARLY SHOWN ON EXHIBIT “B”, ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A
PART HEREOF.
THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DIRECTION, IN
CONFORMANCE WITH THE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR’S ACT.
__________________________________________________ ________________________
TIMOTHY S. FETTIG P.L.S. 7542 DATE
5/25/21
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 39
6.1.aPacket Pg. 40
6.1.aPacket Pg. 41
Recorded at the request of
San Gabriel Valley Council of
Governments
When Recorded Mail to:
SGVCOG
4900 Rivergrade Rd, Ste. A120
Irwindale, CA 91706
Space above this line for Recorder's Use
This document is recorded for the benefit of the San Gabriel
Valley Council of Governments is therefore exempt from the
payment of the recording fee pursuant to Government code
Section 6103 and from the payment of the documentary transfer
tax pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 11922.
GRANT DEED
Parcel Number: 81557-1 Assessor's Parcel No: XXXX-XXX-XXX
CITY OF INDUSTRY,
Hereinafter called GRANTOR, hereby grants and dedicates in fee for public purposes to the San
Gabriel Valley Council of Governments its successors and assigns, herein after called GRANTEE,
all that real property in the City of Diamond Bar, County of Los Angeles, State of California,
described on Exhibit “A” and shown on Exhibit “B” attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference.
This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the GRANTOR hereby releases and
relinquishes to the GRANTEE its successors and assigns any and all abutter’s rights of access,
appurtenant to GRANTOR’s remaining property, in and to the freeway.
The GRANTOR further understands that the present intention of the GRANTEE is to construct
and maintain a public highway on the lands hereby conveyed and the GRANTOR, for itself and
its successors and assigns, hereby waive any and all claims for damages to GRANTOR’s
remaining property contiguous to the property hereby conveyed by reason of the location,
construction, landscaping or maintenance of the highway.
District County Route Postmile Number
7 LA 60 LA R24.404 81557-1
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 42
Dated this day of , 20______.
“GRANTOR”
CITY OF INDUSTRY, A MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION
By: _______________________________
Its: _______________________________
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 43
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California )
) ss
County of ___________ )
On before me,_______________________________________, a
(Name of Notary)
Notary Public, personally appeared ______________________________________________
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same
in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the
person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
(Notary Signature)
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate
verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the
document to which this certificate is attached, and not the
truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 44
Page 1 of 2
EXHIBIT “A”
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PARCEL 81557-1
THAT PORTION OF PARCEL D, IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 2
SOUTH, RANGE 9 WEST, S.B.M., IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, COUNTY OF LOS
ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS DESCRIBED IN THE QUITCLAIM DEED RECORDED
DECEMBER 24, 2020 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 20201726888, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN THE
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF GRAND AVENUE AND GOLDEN
SPRINGS DRIVE AS SHOWN ON THE MAP FILED IN BOOK 326, PAGES 1 THROUGH 10, OF
RECORDS OF SURVEYS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY,
SAID POINT BEING ON A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF
2,999.93 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 57°26'52" WEST;
THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID GRAND AVENUE AND SAID
CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09°47'51", AN ARC LENGTH OF 512.99 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF GRAND AVENUE NORTH 22°45'17"
WEST, 160.70 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID CENTERLINE OF GRAND AVENUE SOUTH 67°14'43" WEST, 64.96
FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID
GRAND AVENUE PER QUITCLAIM DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 24, 2020 AS INSTRUMENT
NO. 20201726887, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER
OF SAID COUNTY, AND THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL D, SAID POINT
BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GRAND AVENUE PER
INSTRUMENT NO. 20201726887 AND ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL D
SOUTH 67°23'00" WEST, 65.00 FEET TO THE GENERALLY WESTERLY LINE OF SAID
PARCEL D;
THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL D AND ALONG SAID
GENERALLY WESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL D SOUTH 02°05'50" EAST, 84.89 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID GENERALLY WESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL D NORTH 67°55'26"
EAST, 53.91 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 65°58'00" EAST, 45.67 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT
CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,280.25 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO
SAID BEGINNING OF CURVE BEARS SOUTH 70°07'07" WEST;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00°11'44" AN
ARC LENGTH OF 7.78 FEET;
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 45
Page 2 of 2
THENCE ALONG A LINE RADIAL TO SAID LAST MENTIONED CURVE NORTH 69°55'23"
EAST, 1.25 FEET TO SAID SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GRAND AVENUE
PER INSTRUMENT NO. 20201726887, SAID POINT BEING ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE,
CONCAVE EASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,279.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT
ON CURVE BEARS SOUTH 69°55'23" WEST;
THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GRAND
AVENUE PER INSTRUMENT NO. 20201726887 AND ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03°03'06" AN ARC LENGTH OF 121.38 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINS A GRID AREA 6,711 SQUARE FEET OR 0.154
ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
THIS CONVEYANCE IS MADE FOR THE PURPOSES OF A FREEWAY AND THE GRANTOR
HEREBY RELEASES AND RELINQUISHES TO THE STATE ANY AND ALL ABUTTER’S
RIGHTS OF ACCESS, APPURTENANT TO GRANTOR’S REMAINING PROPERTY, IN AND TO
THE FREEWAY OVER AND ACROSS THE COURSES DESCRIBED ABOVE WITH LENGTHS
53.91 FEET, 45.67 FEET, 7.78 FEET, AND 1.25 FEET, TOGETHER WITH THE
EXTINGUISHMENT OF ANY AND ALL ABUTTER’S RIGHTS OF VEHICULAR ACCESS,
APPURTENANT TO THE REMAINING PROPERTY OF THE OWNER, OVER AND ACROSS
91.33 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GRAND AVENUE PER
INSTRUMENT NO. 20201726887 (PARCEL 81557-5).
THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES USED IN THE ABOVE DESCRIPTION ARE CALIFORNIA
COORDINATE SYSTEM (CCS83), ZONE V, NAD 83 (1991.35 EPOCH), ALL DISTANCES
SHOWN ARE GRID, TO OBTAIN GROUND DISTANCES DIVIDE BY 0.99997653.
ALL AS MORE PARTICULARLY SHOWN ON EXHIBIT “B”, ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A
PART HEREOF.
THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DIRECTION, IN
CONFORMANCE WITH THE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR’S ACT.
__________________________________________________ ________________________
TIMOTHY S. FETTIG P.L.S. 7542 DATE
6/7/21
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 46
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 47
Recorded at the request of
San Gabriel Valley Council of
Governments
When Recorded Mail to:
SGVCOG
4900 Rivergrade Rd, Ste. A120
Irwindale, CA 91706
Space above this line for Recorder's Use
This document is recorded for the benefit of the San Gabriel
Valley Council of Governments is therefore exempt from the
payment of the recording fee pursuant to Government code
Section 6103 and from the payment of the documentary transfer
tax pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 11922.
GRANT DEED
Parcel Number: 81558-1 Assessor's Parcel No: XXXX-XXX-XXX
CITY OF INDUSTRY,
Hereinafter called GRANTOR, hereby grants and dedicates in fee for public purposes to the San
Gabriel Valley Council of Governments its successors and assigns, herein after called GRANTEE,
all that real property in the City of Diamond Bar, County of Los Angeles, State of California,
described on Exhibit “A” and shown on Exhibit “B” attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference.
This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the GRANTOR hereby releases and
relinquishes to the GRANTEE its successors and assigns any and all abutter’s rights of access,
appurtenant to GRANTOR’s remaining property, in and to the freeway.
The GRANTOR further understands that the present intention of the GRANTEE is to construct
and maintain a public highway on the lands hereby conveyed and the GRANTOR, for itself and
its successors and assigns, hereby waive any and all claims for damages to GRANTOR’s
remaining property contiguous to the property hereby conveyed by reason of the location,
construction, landscaping or maintenance of the highway.
District County Route Postmile Number
7 LA 60 LA R24.447 81558-1
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 48
Dated this day of , 20______.
“GRANTOR”
CITY OF INDUSTRY, A MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION
By: _______________________________
Its: _______________________________
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 49
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California )
) ss
County of ___________ )
On before me,_______________________________________, a
(Name of Notary)
Notary Public, personally appeared ______________________________________________
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same
in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the
person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
(Notary Signature)
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate
verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the
document to which this certificate is attached, and not the
truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 50
Page 1 of 2
EXHIBIT “A”
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PARCEL 81558-1
THAT PORTION OF PARCEL C, IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 2
SOUTH, RANGE 9 WEST, S.B.M., IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, COUNTY OF LOS
ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS DESCRIBED IN THE QUITCLAIM DEED RECORDED
DECEMBER 24, 2020 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 20201726888, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN THE
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF GRAND AVENUE AND GOLDEN
SPRINGS DRIVE AS SHOWN ON THE MAP FILED IN BOOK 326, PAGES 1 THROUGH 10, OF
RECORDS OF SURVEYS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY,
SAID POINT BEING ON A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF
2,999.93 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 57°26'52" WEST;
THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID GRAND AVENUE AND SAID
CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09°47'51", AN ARC LENGTH OF 512.99 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF GRAND AVENUE NORTH 22°45'17"
WEST, 174.25 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID CENTERLINE OF GRAND AVENUE NORTH 67°14'43" EAST, 55.15
FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID
GRAND AVENUE PER DOCUMENT RECORDED JULY 31, 1974 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 3613,
OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, AND THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL C, SAID
POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GRAND AVENUE PER
INSTRUMENT NO. 3613 AND ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL C NORTH
67°23'00" EAST, 29.42 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE
EASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,131.75 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID BEGINNING OF
CURVE BEARS SOUTH 73°44'11" WEST;
THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL C AND SOUTHERLY ALONG
SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 04°27'00" AN ARC LENGTH OF 165.57 FEET;
THENCE ALONG A LINE RADIAL TO SAID LAST MENTIONED CURVE SOUTH 69°17'11"
WEST, 2.25 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID GRAND
AVENUE PER QUITCLAIM DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 24, 2020 AS INSTRUMENT NO.
20201726887, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF
SAID COUNTY, SAID POINT BEING ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY,
HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,134.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT ON CURVE BEARS
SOUTH 69°17'11" WEST;
THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GRAND AVENUE PER
INSTRUMENT NO. 20201726887 THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES:
NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00°23'19" AN ARC
LENGTH OF 14.47 FEET;
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 51
Page 2 of 2
NORTH 28°47'41" WEST, 148.32 FEET TO SAID NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF
GRAND AVENUE PER INSTRUMENT NO. 3613, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A
NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,949.93 FEET, A
RADIAL LINE TO SAID BEGINNING OF CURVE BEARS SOUTH 70°34'17" WEST;
THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GRAND AVENUE PER
INSTRUMENT NO. 20201726887 AND NORTHERLY ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT-
OF-WAY LINE OF GRAND AVENUE PER INSTRUMENT NO. 3613 AND ALONG SAID CURVE
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00°03'37" AN ARC LENGTH OF 3.10 FEET TO THE TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINS A GRID AREA 2,320 SQUARE FEET OR 0.053
ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
THIS CONVEYANCE IS MADE FOR THE PURPOSES OF A FREEWAY AND THE GRANTOR
HEREBY RELEASES AND RELINQUISHES TO THE STATE ANY AND ALL ABUTTER’S
RIGHTS OF ACCESS, APPURTENANT TO GRANTOR’S REMAINING PROPERTY, IN AND TO
THE FREEWAY OVER AND ACROSS THE COURSES DESCRIBED ABOVE WITH LENGTHS
165.57 AND 2.25 FEET, TOGETHER WITH THE EXTINGUISHMENT OF ANY AND ALL
ABUTTER’S RIGHTS OF VEHICULAR ACCESS, APPURTENANT TO THE REMAINING
PROPERTY OF THE OWNER, OVER AND ACROSS 87.56 FEET ALONG SAID
NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GRAND AVENUE PER INSTRUMENT NO.
20201726887 (PARCEL 81558-4).
THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES USED IN THE ABOVE DESCRIPTION ARE CALIFORNIA
COORDINATE SYSTEM (CCS83), ZONE V, NAD 83 (1991.35 EPOCH), ALL DISTANCES
SHOWN ARE GRID, TO OBTAIN GROUND DISTANCES DIVIDE BY 0.99997653.
ALL AS MORE PARTICULARLY SHOWN ON EXHIBIT “B”, ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A
PART HEREOF.
THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DIRECTION, IN
CONFORMANCE WITH THE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR’S ACT.
__________________________________________________ ________________________
TIMOTHY S. FETTIG P.L.S. 7542 DATE
6/7/21
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 52
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 53
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 54
State of California
GOVERNMENT CODE
Section 65402
65402. (a) If a general plan or part thereof has been adopted, no real property shall
be acquired by dedication or otherwise for street, square, park or other public purposes,
and no real property shall be disposed of, no street shall be vacated or abandoned,
and no public building or structure shall be constructed or authorized, if the adopted
general plan or part thereof applies thereto, until the location, purpose and extent of
such acquisition or disposition, such street vacation or abandonment, or such public
building or structure have been submitted to and reported upon by the planning agency
as to conformity with said adopted general plan or part thereof. The planning agency
shall render its report as to conformity with said adopted general plan or part thereof
within forty (40) days after the matter was submitted to it, or such longer period of
time as may be designated by the legislative body.
If the legislative body so provides, by ordinance or resolution, the provisions of
this subdivision shall not apply to: (1) the disposition of the remainder of a larger
parcel which was acquired and used in part for street purposes; (2) acquisitions,
dispositions, or abandonments for street widening; or (3) alignment projects, provided
such dispositions for street purposes, acquisitions, dispositions, or abandonments for
street widening, or alignment projects are of a minor nature.
(b) A county shall not acquire real property for any of the purposes specified in
paragraph (a), nor dispose of any real property, nor construct or authorize a public
building or structure, in another county or within the corporate limits of a city, if such
city or other county has adopted a general plan or part thereof and such general plan
or part thereof is applicable thereto, and a city shall not acquire real property for any
of the purposes specified in paragraph (a), nor dispose of any real property, nor
construct or authorize a public building or structure, in another city or in unincorporated
territory, if such other city or the county in which such unincorporated territory is
situated has adopted a general plan or part thereof and such general plan or part thereof
is applicable thereto, until the location, purpose and extent of such acquisition,
disposition, or such public building or structure have been submitted to and reported
upon by the planning agency having jurisdiction, as to conformity with said adopted
general plan or part thereof. Failure of the planning agency to report within forty (40)
days after the matter has been submitted to it shall be conclusively deemed a finding
that the proposed acquisition, disposition, or public building or structure is in
conformity with said adopted general plan or part thereof. The provisions of this
paragraph (b) shall not apply to acquisition or abandonment for street widening or
alignment projects of a minor nature if the legislative body having the real property
within its boundaries so provides by ordinance or resolution.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
AUTHENTICATED
ELECTRONIC LEGAL MATERIAL
6.1.b
Packet Pg. 55
(c) A local agency shall not acquire real property for any of the purposes specified
in paragraph (a) nor dispose of any real property, nor construct or authorize a public
building or structure, in any county or city, if such county or city has adopted a general
plan or part thereof and such general plan or part thereof is applicable thereto, until
the location, purpose and extent of such acquisition, disposition, or such public building
or structure have been submitted to and reported upon by the planning agency having
jurisdiction, as to conformity with said adopted general plan or part thereof. Failure
of the planning agency to report within forty (40) days after the matter has been
submitted to it shall be conclusively deemed a finding that the proposed acquisition,
disposition, or public building or structure is in conformity with said adopted general
plan or part thereof. If the planning agency disapproves the location, purpose or extent
of such acquisition, disposition, or the public building or structure, the disapproval
may be overruled by the local agency.
Local agency as used in this paragraph (c) means an agency of the state for the
local performance of governmental or proprietary functions within limited boundaries.
Local agency does not include the state, or county, or a city.
(Amended by Stats. 1974, Ch. 700.)
6.1.b
Packet Pg. 56
PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 7.1
MEETING DATE: August 24, 2021
CASE/FILE NUMBER: Amendment to Conditional Use Permit (Planning
Case No. PL2021-39)
PROJECT LOCATION:
2751 S. Diamond Bar Boulevard
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
(APN 8285-020-044)
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial (C)
ZONING DISTRICT: Community Commercial (C-2)
PROPERTY OWNER:
ROIC Diamond Hills Plaza, LLC
11250 El Camino Real #200
San Diego, CA 92130
APPLICANT:
Lance Kim
EPLEX DB, INC
6940 Beach Boulevard, #D-212
Buena Park, CA 90621
SUMMARY:
The applicant, Lance Kim for EPLEX, DB, INC, is requesting approval of an amendment
to an existing Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to operate an education center with after -
school, tutoring, music, and art programs within a 9,904 square-foot tenant space at
Diamond Hills Plaza, a 203,181 square-foot shopping center.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the attached Resolution (Attachment A) approving an amendment to a
Conditional Use Permit (Planning Case No. PL2021-39), based on the findings of
Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Section 22.58, subject to conditions.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ~ 21810 COPLEY DRIVE ~ DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 ~ TEL. (909) 839-7030 ~ FAX (909) 861-3117
7.1
Packet Pg. 57
Amendment to Conditional Use Permit (Planning Case No. PL2021-39)
Page 2 of 11
BACKGROUND:
Diamond Hills Plaza is a 203,181 square -foot shopping center located west of Diamond
Bar Boulevard, between Fountain Springs Road and Cold Spring L ane. The shopping
center is anchored by the Super H-Mart grocery store and includes tenants such as
retail, restaurants, personal services, professional and medical offices, banks, a
children’s daycare, studios and non-degree schools. Diamond Hills Plaza provides 944
on-site parking spaces.
On May 11, 2010, the Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit
(Planning Case No. PL2010-89) to allow Orchepia School of Music to operate a music
and art school for school age children and young adults at a tenant space located at the
north end of the Diamond Hills Plaza shopping center.
The applicant is requesting Planning Commission approval to amend the previously-
approved CUP to operate an education center with after -school tutoring, music, and art
programs within the 9,904 square-foot vacant tenant space that was formerly occupied
by the Orchepia School of Music.
Site and Surrounding General Plan, Zoning and Land Uses
The following table describes the surrounding land uses located adjacent to the sub ject
property:
General Plan Designation Zoning Land Uses
Site General Commercial (C)
Community
Commercial
(C-2)
Shopping Center
North
Low Medium Residential
(RLM)
Low Medium
Residential
(RLM)
Single-Family Residential
South
Low Medium Residential
(RLM)
Low Medium
Residential
(RLM)
Single-Family Residential
Southeast
Medium High Residential
(RMH)
Medium High
Residential
(RMH)
Multi-Family Residential
East
Rural Residential (RR) &
Office (O)
Rural
Residential
(RR) & Office,
Professional
(OP)
Single-Family Residential;
Office Building Consisting of
Professional and Medical
Offices, and Personal
Services
West
Low Medium Residential
(RLM)
Low Medium
Residential
(RLM)
Single-Family Residential
7.1
Packet Pg. 58
Amendment to Conditional Use Permit (Planning Case No. PL2021-39)
Page 3 of 11
Aerial View
7.1
Packet Pg. 59
Amendment to Conditional Use Permit (Planning Case No. PL2021-39)
Page 4 of 11
Storefront of Proposed Tenant Lease Space
Project Description
E-PLEX is an education center that provides a variety of academic and extracurricular
programs, such as after-school homework assistance, one-on-one tutoring, piano and
fundamental art classes, within a single complex. Currently, E -PLEX operates
education centers in three different locations: Duluth, Georgia; Los Angeles, California;
and Buena Park, California. The applicant is proposing to provide academic and
extracurricular programs geared towards elementary to middle school-aged students in
the Diamond Bar location.
During the academic school year, the proposed education center will be open from
3:00 p.m. to 7 p.m. from Monday through Friday, and 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. on Saturdays.
During the summer months of June to early August, the hours of operation will be 9 a.m.
to 6 p.m. Monday through Friday, and 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. on Saturdays.
The following table describes the proposed class schedule for the academic school year
and summer months from June to early August:
Proposed Class Schedule
Class Grade Level Students /
Teachers
Class
Duration
Hours of Operation
Monday – Friday Saturday
After
School /
Summer
School
Kindergarten
to 2nd grade
30 students /
5 teachers 2-3 hours
3 p.m. to 6 p.m.:
after school;
9 a.m. to 6 p.m.:
summer school only
7.1
Packet Pg. 60
Amendment to Conditional Use Permit (Planning Case No. PL2021-39)
Page 5 of 11
After
School /
Summer
School
2nd grade to
5th grade
30 students /
5 teachers 2-3 hours
3 p.m. to 6 p.m.:
after school;
9 a.m. to 6 p.m.:
summer school only
Tutoring
(1-on-1,
1-on-2)
Kindergarten
to 8th grade
20 students /
2 teachers 1 hour
4 p.m. to 7 p.m.;
3 p.m. to 6 p.m. in
the summer
9 a.m. to 1
p.m.
Music
(1-on-1)
Kindergarten
to 8th grade
20 students /
2 teachers 1 hour
4 p.m. to 7 p.m.;
3 p.m. to 6 p.m. in
the summer
9 a.m. to 1
p.m.
Art
(1-on-4)
Kindergarten
to 8th grade
20 students /
2 teachers 1 hour
4 p.m. to 7 p.m.;
3 p.m. to 6 p.m. in
the summer
9 a.m. to 1
p.m.
Total 120 students
16 teachers
E-PLEX is proposing to have a maximum of 16 teachers, 2 administrative staff
members, and 70 students at the location at any g iven time. After-school programs
range from two-to-three hours with 4 to 8 students per class. Private tutoring, music,
and art classes are scheduled in one-hour intervals ranging from 1 to 4 students per
class. Although the table above shows a total number of 120 students, the maximum
number of students at one time is 70 students due to the various class types, number of
teachers, and class duration. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission add a
condition to allow no more than 70 students at any one time (Condition of Approval #5).
7.1
Packet Pg. 61
Amendment to Conditional Use Permit (Planning Case No. PL2021-39)
Page 6 of 11
Proposed Floor Plan
The applicant proposes to occupy a 9,904 square -foot vacant tenant space. The
proposed floor plan consists of a lobby/reception area, ten classrooms for after school
and tutoring programs, two classrooms for art classes, four classrooms for music
classes, three offices, two storage rooms, restroom facilities, a break room, and a large,
centralized room in the center of the tenant space which acts as an exercise room.
7.1
Packet Pg. 62
Amendment to Conditional Use Permit (Planning Case No. PL2021-39)
Page 7 of 11
ANALYSIS:
Review Authority (DBMC Section 22.58)
A CUP is required for uses whose effect on the surrounding area cannot be determined
before being analyzed for suitability at a particular location.
When reviewing a CUP, consideration is given to the location, design, configurati on,
operational characteristics and potential impacts to determine whether or not the
proposed use will pose a detriment to the public health, safety and welfare. If it can be
found that the proposed use is likely to be compatible with its surroundings, t he
Commission may approve the proposed use subject to conditions stipulating the
manner in which the use must be conducted. If the Commission finds that the proposed
use is likely to be detrimental to the general peace, health and general welfare, then it
must deny the request.
When a CUP is approved, it runs with the land and all conditions placed on the CUP are
binding on all successors in interest. In other words, if the owner were to close the
business, a new tenant could locate in the space and operate the same type of
business. The new tenant would be required to comply with the same conditions as the
previous tenant and would not be permitted to expand the business without full review
and approval by the Planning Commission.
Required Parking
Shopping centers over 50,000 square feet in size are required to provide one parking
space for every 300 square feet of gross floor area. The AAA building, the three -story
professional office building (2705 S. Diamond Bar Blvd.) facing Fountain Springs Road,
and the child daycare center facing Cold Spring Lane are located on separately owned
parcels and are not part of Diamond Hills Plaza. However, all parcels fall under a single
shared parking agreement. The parking requirements for businesses approved unde r a
CUP (e.g., fitness centers, schools, tutoring, etc.,) are calculated separately. The table
on the next page provides a summary of the parking requirements for the shopping
center.
Diamond Hills Plaza provides 944 off-street parking spaces. The parking required for
the current palette of uses minus the proposed education center is 757 spaces. The
proposed education center requires 70 spaces. The total off -street parking requirement
for the shopping center would thus be 827 spaces, leaving a surplus of 117 spaces
based on Development Code requirements.
7.1
Packet Pg. 63
Amendment to Conditional Use Permit (Planning Case No. PL2021-39)
Page 8 of 11
Parking Demand
When reviewing parking impacts on shopping centers, the various uses and peak
business hours for those uses are taken into consideration. The existing shopping
center has uses ranging from restaurants, professional and medical offices, personal
services, retail, and specialized education and training uses. The different uses result in
a range of peak business hours and parking demands. Therefore, staff requested for
additional parking analysis for the proposed use. A parking demand analysis was
prepared by traffic engineers Linscott, Law & Greenspan (LLG) and is included as
7.1
Packet Pg. 64
Amendment to Conditional Use Permit (Planning Case No. PL2021-39)
Page 9 of 11
Attachment B. The supplemental traffic and parking assessment concludes that the
peak hours and parking needs do not conflict with existing uses.
Based on the parking demand analysis, the existing parking supply would
accommodate the parking demand of existing uses and the proposed education center.
The weekday scenario would result in a peak demand of 871 spaces, whereas the
weekend scenario would result in a peak demand of 730 spaces. The summer
weekday scenario would result in a peak demand of 879 spaces. When compared to
the existing on-site parking supply of 944 spaces, the weekday and weekend scenario s
would result in a surplus of parking spaces: 73 spaces, 214 spaces, and 65 spaces
respectively.
The parking study indicates that the available shared parking supply of 944 spaces will
be sufficient to meet the projected peak parking demands of existing and proposed
uses. The proposed use will not increase any square footage to the existing building,
and the north end of the shopping is not heavily congested or utilized. Therefore, the
proposed education center is not anticipated to cause any parking im pacts to the
existing parking facilities at Diamond Hills Plaza.
However, once the education school is in operation, and should traffic and/or parking
issues arise, the Community Development Director, after providing the applicant a
reasonable opportunity to mitigate the impact(s) to an acceptable level, may refer the
matter back to the Planning Commission to consider amending or revoking the
Conditional Use Permit to address such impacts (Condition of Approval #6).
Compatibility with Neighborhood
The Diamond Hills Plaza shopping center is surrounded by residential uses to the north,
south, east and west. The shopping center has numerous different uses, including
service and retail uses, restaurants, medical and professional offices, banks, and
studios and non-degree schools.
Given the proposed hours of operation, the availability of parking, and the diversity of
uses, the proposed education center is expected to be a compatible use at this location.
In addition, the north end of the shopping center is less occupied with commercial
activity compared to the south side of the shopping center. The proposed education
center can bring additional people to the shopping center as students and parents will
be exposed to and shop at the restaurants and retail stores in the center. The proposed
use is consistent with the current zoning designation of Community Commercial.
Noise: The tenant space was previously occupied by Orchepia School of Music, a
music and art school. Although the applicant is still proposing to have music classes,
the four classrooms designated for music lessons will be located at the end of the
building, opposite from the adjacent tenant. In addition, the wall between the adjacent
tenant and the subject tenant space is a 1-hour fire treated wall which consists of metal
studs with 5/8-inch-thick Type X drywall on each side, which has a Sound Transmission
7.1
Packet Pg. 65
Amendment to Conditional Use Permit (Planning Case No. PL2021-39)
Page 10 of 11
Class (STC) rating of 49-54. In addition, the classrooms have an acoustical T -Bar
ceiling and carpet floor, which will further attenuate sound. Therefore, it is likely that the
proposed education center would have a negligible effect on existing noise in the vicinity
and would not be a nuisance to the adjacent businesses.
Additional Review
The Building and Safety Division reviewed this project, and their comments are included
in the attached resolution as conditions of approval.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING:
On August 11, 2021, public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a
700-foot radius of the project site. On August 13 , 2021, the notice was published in the
San Gabriel Valley Tribune newspaper; the project site was posted with a notice display
board; and a copy of the public notice was posted at the City’s designated community
posting sites.
Public Comments Received
No comments have been received as of the publication date of this report.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT:
This project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA). Based on that assessment, the City has determined th e project to be
Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to the provisions of
Article 19 Section 15301(a) (Interior alterations involving partitions and electrical
conveyances) of the CEQA Guidelines. No further environmental review is re quired.
PREPARED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
Attachments:
7.1
Packet Pg. 66
Amendment to Conditional Use Permit (Planning Case No. PL2021-39)
Page 11 of 11
A. Draft Resolution No. 2021-XX and Standard Conditions of Approval
B. Parking Demand Analysis Dated July 15, 2021
C. Site Plan and Floor Plan
7.1
Packet Pg. 67
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND
BAR, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT (PLANNING CASE NO. PL2021-39), TO OPERATE AN EDUCATION
CENTER WITH AFTER-SCHOOL, TUTORING, MUSIC, AND ART PROGRAMS
WITHIN A 9,904 SQUARE-FOOT TENANT SPACE AT DIAMOND HILLS PLAZA
LOCATED AT 2751 SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD, DIAMOND BAR, CA
(APN 8285-020-044).
A. RECITALS
1. Property owner, ROIC Diamond Hills Plaza, LLC, and applicant, Lance Kim for
EPLEX DB, INC, have filed an application for an Amendment to Conditional Use
Permit (Planning Case No. PL2021-39) to amend existing Conditional Use Permit
(Planning Case No. PL2010-89) to operate an education center with after-school,
tutoring, music, and art programs within a 9,904 square -foot tenant space at an
existing shopping center, Diamond Hills Plaza. The project site is more
specifically described as 2751 South Diamond Bar Boulevard, Diamond Bar, Los
Angeles County, California. Hereinafter in this resolution, the subject
Amendment to Conditional Use Permit shall collectively be referred to as the
“Project” or “Proposed Use.”
2. The subject property is comprised of 20 parcels totaling 17.2 acres. It is located
in the Community Commercial (C-2) zone with a General Plan land use
designation of General Commercial.
3. The legal description of the subject property is Parcel Map 247 -28-31. The
Assessor’s Parcel Number is 8285-020-044.
4. On August 11, 2021, notification of the public hearing for this project was
published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune newspaper. On August 13, 2021,
public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 700-foot radius of
the Project site and posted at the City’s designated community posting sites.
5. On August 24, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar
conducted a duly noticed public hearing, solicited testimony from all interested
individuals, and concluded said hearing on that date.
B. RESOLUTION
NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission
of the City of Diamond Bar as follows:
1. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth
in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 68
2
PC Resolution No. 2021-XX
2. The Planning Commission hereby determines the Project to be Categorically
Exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
pursuant to the provisions of Article 19, Section 15301(a) (Interior alterations
involving partitions and electrical conveyances) of the CEQA Guidelines.
Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
C. FINDINGS OF FACT
Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein and as prescribed under
Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Section 22.58, this Planning Commission hereby
finds and approves as follows:
Conditional Use Permit Review Findings (DBMC Section 22.58)
1. The Proposed Use is allowed within the subject zoning district with the approval
of a conditional use permit and complies with all other applicable provisions of
this Development Code and the Municipal Code.
Pursuant to DBMC Section 22.10.030 Table 2-6, a specialized education and
training school, as defined by DBMC Section 22.80.020, is permitted in the C-2
zoning district with approval of a conditional use permit. The Proposed Use will
be located in a tenant space within Diamond Hills Plaza, an existing shopping
center. Through compliance with the conditions of approval stipulating the
manner in which the use must be conducted, the Proposed Use will be compatible
with neighboring uses in the shopping center and surrounding neighborhood.
2. The Proposed Use is consistent with the general plan and any applicable specific
plan.
The Proposed Use is consistent with General Plan Goal LU-G-11: (“Support
existing commercial centers by encouraging ongoing investment and, where
appropriate, reuse and redevelopment”) in that the Proposed Use will occupy an
existing tenant space.
The Proposed Use is consistent with General Plan Goal ED -G-3: (“Support the
retention, rehabilitation, and/or expansion of existing businesses, and the
attraction of new businesses”) in that the Proposed Use is a new business
locating within an existing shopping center.
The Project site is not subject to the provisions of any specific plan.
3. The design, location, size and operating characteristics of the Proposed Use are
compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity.
The Proposed Use will be located in a vacant tenant space formerly occupied by
Orchepia Music School at the north end of a multi-tenant commercial shopping
center occupied by various retail, restaurants, office, and service uses. The
Proposed Use complies with the City’s Development Code parking requirement
as well as parking demand. During the academic school year, the Proposed Use
will operate from 3:00 p.m. to 7 p.m. from Monday through Friday and 9 a.m. to
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 69
3
PC Resolution No. 2021-XX
1 p.m. on Saturdays. The Proposed Use will operate from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. from
Monday through Friday, and from 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. on Saturdays during the
summer months from June to early August.
The proposed education center may bring a synergy and diversity of use and
customers to the existing shopping center to create a more thriving, vibrant
center. By having the Proposed Use, the students attending the education
center, and parents dropping off/picking up the students will be exposed to, and
shop at, the stores and restaurants in the shopping center. As such, the
operational characteristics are compatible with the existing and future land uses
in the vicinity.
Through compliance with the conditions of approval stipulating the manner in
which the use must be conducted, the Proposed Use will be compatible with the
other uses within the commercial building and surrounding neighborhood.
4. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of use
being proposed, including access, provision of utilities, compatibility with
adjoining land uses, and the absence of physical constraints.
The Proposed Use is physically suitable within the subject site because it will be
located in an existing vacant tenant space previously occupied by a music and
arts school within an existing commercial shopping center. No additional square
footage is being proposed. In addition, the Proposed Use will be using existing
access and parking. Diamond Hills Plaza provides 944 on-site parking spaces.
The parking required for the current palette of uses minus the proposed education
center is 757 spaces. The proposed education center requires 70 spaces. The
total off-street parking requirement for the center would thus be 827 spaces,
leaving a surplus of 117 spaces based on Development Code requirements.
Based on the parking demand analysis submitted that includes site observations
and case studies, the existing parking supply would accommodate the parking
demand of existing uses and the proposed education center. The parking study
indicates that the available shared parking supply of 944 spaces will be sufficient
to meet the projected peak parking demands of existing and proposed uses.
Therefore, the Proposed Use is not anticipated to cause any parking impacts to
the existing parking facilities at Diamond Hills Plaza.
Given the proposed hours of operation, the overall parking de mands, and the
types of adjoining uses, it is reasonable to conclude that the Proposed Use will
be compatible with the other uses in the commercial shopping center and
neighborhood. In addition, if the City finds that the Proposed Use is the cause of
a parking deficiency or other land use impact, the Community Development
Director, after providing the entitlement holder a reasonable opportunity to
mitigate the impact(s) to an acceptable level, may refer the matter back to the
Planning Commission to consider amending or revoking this Conditional Use
Permit to address such impacts.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 70
4
PC Resolution No. 2021-XX
5. Granting the amendment to the conditional use permit will not be detrimental to
the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or injurious to persons,
property, or improvements in the vicinity and zoning district in which the property
is located.
Prior to the issuance of any city permits, the Project is required to comply with all
conditions of approval within the attached resolution, and the Building and Safety
Division.
6. The proposed Project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
The proposed use is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as set forth under Article 19 Section 15301(a)
(Interior alterations involving partitions and electrical conveyances) of the CEQA
Guidelines.
D. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Based upon the findings and conclusion set forth above, the Planning Commission
hereby approves Amendment to Conditional Use Permit (Planning Case No. PL2021-
39) subject to the following conditions:
1. This approval is for the operation of an education center with after-school,
tutoring, music, and art programs within a 9,904 square-foot tenant space at
Diamond Hills Plaza, an existing shopping center as described in the application
on file with the Planning Division, the Planning Commission staff report for
Amendment to Conditional Use Permit (Planning Case No. PL2021-39) dated
August 24, 2021, and the Planning Commission minutes pertaining thereto,
hereafter referred to as the “Use.”
2. The Use shall substantially conform to the approved plans as submitted and
approved by the Planning Commission and on file with the Community
Development Department.
3. This Amendment to Conditional Use Permit shall be valid only for 2751 S.
Diamond Bar Boulevard, as depicted on the approved plans on file with the
Planning Division. If the Proposed Use moves to a different location or expands
into additional tenant spaces, the approved Con ditional Use Permit shall
terminate and a new Conditional Use Permit, subject to Planning Commission
approval shall be required for the new location.
4. The hours of operation shall be limited to 3:00 p.m. to 7 p.m. Monday through
Friday, and 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. on Saturdays. The hours of operation during the
summer months from June to early August shall be limited to 9 a.m. to 6 p.m.
Monday through Friday, and 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. on Saturdays.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 71
5
PC Resolution No. 2021-XX
5. The education center shall have no more than 70 students for classes at any one time.
6. If, at any time, the City finds that the Use is the cause of a parking deficiency,
noise nuisance, or other land use impact, within or beyond the subject property
boundaries, the Community Development Director, after providing the entitlement
holder a reasonable opportunity to mitigate the impact(s) to an acceptable level,
may refer the matter back to the Planning Commission to consider amending or
revoking this Conditional Use Permit to address such impacts.
7. Identify the music classrooms on the plans submitted for building plan check.
8. No changes to the approved scope of services comprising the use shall be
permitted unless the applicant first applies for an amendment to this Conditional
Use Permit, pays all application processing fees and receives approval from the
Planning Commission.
The Planning Commission shall:
(a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and
(b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail to
the property owner, ROIC Diamond Hills Plaza, LLC, 11250 El Camino
Real #200, San Diego, CA 92130; and applicant, Lance Kim, EPLEX DB,
INC, 6940 Beach Blvd., #D-212, Buena Park, CA 90621.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2021, BY THE PLANNING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR.
By: ______________________________________
William Rawlings, Chairperson
I, Greg Gubman, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 24th day of August, 2021, by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners:
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST: ___________________________
Greg Gubman, Secretary
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 72
6
PC Resolution No. 2021-XX
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
USE PERMITS, COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL
NEW AND REMODELED STRUCTURES
PROJECT #: Amendment to Conditional Use Permit (Planning Case No. PL2021-39)
SUBJECT: To operate an education center with after-school tutoring, music, and
art programs within a 9,904 square-foot tenant space at Diamond
Hills Plaza, an existing shopping center
PROPERTY ROIC Diamond Hills Plaza, LLC
OWNER(S): 11250 El Camino Real #200
San Diego, CA 92130
APPLICANT: Lance Kim
EPLEX DB, INC
6940 Beach Boulevard, #D-212
Buena Park, CA 90621
LOCATION: 2751 South Diamond Bar Boulevard
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION AT (909) 839-7030, FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
A. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
1. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, and its officers,
agents and employees, from any claim, action, or proceeding to attack, set-aside,
void, or annul the approval of an Amendment to Conditional Use Permit (Planning
Case No. PL2021-39) brought within the time period provided by Government
Code Section 66499.37. In the event the city and/or its officers, agents and
employees are made a party of any such action:
(a) Applicant shall provide a defense to the City defendants or at the City's
option reimburse the City its costs of defense, including reasonable
attorney fees, incurred in defense of such claims.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 73
7
PC Resolution No. 2021-XX
(b) Applicant shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against the City
defendants. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim,
action of proceeding, and shall cooperate fully in the defense thereof.
2. This approval shall not be effective for any purpose until the applicant and owner
of the property involved have filed, within twenty-one (21) days of approval of this
Amendment to Conditional Use Permit (Planning Case No. PL2021-39) at the
City of Diamond Bar Community Development Department, the ir affidavit stating
that they are aware of and agree to accept all the conditions of this approval.
Further, this approval shall not be effective until the applicants pay remaining City
processing fees.
3. The business owners and all designers, architect s, engineers, and contractors
associated with this project shall obtain a Diamond Bar Business License for
those businesses located in Diamond Bar.
4. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon,
all conditions of approval shall be completed.
5. The project site shall be maintained and operated in full compliance with the
conditions of approval and all laws, or other applicable regulations.
6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the
Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and any applicable
Specific Plan in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
7. To ensure compliance with all conditions of approval and applicable codes, the
Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to periodic review. If non-compliance
with conditions of approval occurs, the Planning Commission may review the
Conditional Use Permit. The Commission may revoke or modify the Conditional
Use Permit.
8. Property owner/applicant shall remove the public hearing notice board within
three (3) days of this project's approval.
9. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of City Planning, Building and
Safety Divisions, Public Works Department, and the Fire Department.
B. FEES/DEPOSITS
1. Applicant shall pay development fees (including but not limited to Planning,
Building and Safety Divisions, and Public Works Department) at the established
rates, prior to issuance of building permits, as required by the City. School fees
as required shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permit. In addition, the
applicant shall pay all remaining prorated City project review and processing fees
prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever comes first.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 74
8
PC Resolution No. 2021-XX
2. Prior to any plan check, all deposit accounts for the processing of this project
shall have no deficits.
C. TIME LIMITS
1. The approval of Amendment to Conditional Use Permit (Planning Case No.
PL2021-39) shall expire within one (1) year from the date of approval if the use
has not been exercised as defined per DBMC Section 22.66.050 (b)(1). The
applicant may request in writing a one-year time extension subject to DBMC
Section 22.60.050(c) for Planning Commission approval.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 839-7020,
FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
General Conditions:
1. At the time of plan check submittal, plans and construction shall conform to
current State and Local Building Code (i.e. 2019 California Building Code series
will apply) requirements and all other applicable construction codes, ordinances
and regulations in effect.
2. Provisions for CALGreen shall be implemented onto plans and certification shall
be provided by a third party as required by the Building Division. Specific water,
waste, low VOC, and related conservation measures shall be shown on plans.
Construction shall conform to the current CALGreen Code.
3. The occupant load factor used for the center exercise room shall be 50 sq. ft. per
occupant.
4. The occupant load factor used for the classroom areas shall be 20 sq. ft. per
occupant, with no children 2 years or younger.
Plan Check – Items to be addressed prior to plan approval:
5. “Separate permit shall be required for all wall and monument signs” and shall be
noted on plans.
6. Number of plumbing fixtures shall be in compliance with CPC T-422.
7. Provide at least one bathroom for each sex per CBC 412.3.
8. Plans shall reflect adequate exit requirements. The distance betw een required
exits shall be ½ of the overall building diagonal dimension.
9. Fire Department approval shall be required. Proof of approval for the E
occupancy is required.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 75
9
PC Resolution No. 2021-XX
Permit – Items required prior to building permit issuance:
10. Solid waste management of construction material shall incorporate recycling
material collection per Diamond Bar Municipal Code 8.16 of Title 8. The
contractor shall complete all required forms and pay applicable deposits prior to
permit.
11. AQMD notification is required at least 10 days prior to any demolition. Proof of
notification is required at permit issuance.
12. All workers on the job shall be covered by workman’s compensation insurance
under a licensed general contractor. Any changes to the contractor shall be
updated on the building permit.
Construction – Conditions required during construction:
13. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until all California Building Code
and State Fire Marshal regulations have been met. The buildings shall be
inspected for compliance prior to occupancy.
14. Every permit issued by the building official under the provisions of this Code shall
expire and become null and void unless the work authorized by such permit is
commenced within one year after permit issuance, and if a successful inspection
has not been obtained from the building official within one-hundred-eighty (180)
days from the date of permit issuance or the last successful inspection. A
successful inspection shall mean a documented passed inspection by the city
building inspector as outlined in Section 110.6.
15. All structures and property shall be maintained in a safe and clean manner during
construction. The property shall be free of debris, trash, and weeds.
16. All equipment staging areas shall be maintained in an orderly manner and
screened behind a minimum 6’ high fence.
17. The applicant shall contact Dig Alert and have underground utility locations
marked by the utility companies prior to any excavation. Contact Dig Alert by
dialing 811 or their website at www.digalert.org.
18. The applicant shall first request and secure approval from the City for any
changes or deviations from approved plans prior to proceeding with any work in
accordance with such changes or deviations.
19. All glazing in hazardous locations shall be labeled as safety glass. The labeling
shall be visible for inspection.
END
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 76
July 15, 2021
Sunhwa Lee
Eplex DB, Inc
2751 S Diamond Bar Blvd
Diamond Bar, CA, 91765
LLG Reference No. 2.21.4394.1
Subject: Revised Parking Demand Analysis for the
Proposed Eplex at Diamond Hills Plaza
Diamond Bar, California
Dear Sunhwa Lee:
As requested, Linscott, Law, & Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) is pleased to submit this
Revised Parking Demand Analysis for Eplex at Diamond Hills Plaza associated with
the re-occupancy of Suite 2751 an existing music school with Eplex, a tutoring center
for art, music, ballet and academics (herein after referred to as Project). Diamond
Hills Plaza is an existing mixed-use shopping center located west of Diamond Bar
Boulevard, between Cold Springs Lane and Fountain Springs Road and addressed at
2705 - 2899 S. Diamond Bar Boulevard and 21335 – 21385 Cold Springs Lane in the
City of Diamond Bar. The report was revised to reflect updated weekday and
weekend operational data for the proposed Eplex. Pursuant to our discussions and
understanding of the City of Diamond Bar requirements, the preparation of a parking
study is required as part of the review and approval process to ensure that adequate
parking is provided upon completion of the Project and full occupancy of the
shopping center. The prior parking study for Diamond Hills Plaza, Updated Parking
Demand Analysis for the Proposed Diamond Hills Plaza Health Club Project, dated
January 29, 2020 has been used as a data base for this parking analysis.
Diamond Hills Plaza is an established mixed-used retail center with a total floor area
of 203,181 square-feet (SF). The current tenant mix, which occupies 162,279 SF,
includes H-Mart, AAA and a variety of retail/commercial and restaurant/food uses.
The remaining floor area of 40,902 SF consists of a mix of retail/commercial, health
club, studio, and school floor area. It is our understanding that the proposed Project
includes the re-occupancy of 10,000 SF of vacant school designation space (former
Orchepia Music School) with Eplex, a tutoring center for art, music, ballet and
academics. It is our understanding that the Eplex would have a maximum daily
7.1.b
Packet Pg. 77
Sunhwa Lee
July 15, 2021
Page 2
N:\4300\2214394 - Eplex at Diamond Hills Plaza, Diamond Bar\Report\4394 Eplex Tutoring Center Parking Demand Analysis
7-15-21.doc
capacity of 72 students and a maximum of 16 teachers plus 2 staff on-site. Classes are
anticipated to occur between 3PM and 7PM on weekdays, between 9AM and 1PM on
Saturdays and between 9AM and 6PM on summer weekdays. The existing parking
supply for Diamond Hills Plaza totals 944 spaces.
This parking analysis evaluates the shopping center’s parking requirements based on
the City of Diamond Bar Municipal Code, as well as the current shared parking
methodology outlined in Urban Land Institute’s (ULI) Shared Parking, 3rd Edition
and in consideration of the City of Diamond Bar Municipal Code, Section 22.30.050 –
Reduction of off-street parking requirements for shared use.
The study focused on the following:
Calculates the Code-based parking requirements for Diamond Hills Plaza based on
the application of City Code parking ratios.
Estimates parking demand through the application of the Shared Parking concept.
Includes existing parking demand surveys of Diamond Hills Plaza to establish
current shared parking peak parking requirements for the current tenants and
forecasts the aggregate parking demand of the retail center at full occupancy with the
application of shared parking methodology for the proposed Project based on
anticipated mix of uses.
Compares survey plus shared parking demand against the existing/future parking
supply, in order to identify any potential, operational surplus or deficiency in
parking supply.
Our method of analysis, findings, and conclusions are described in detail in the
following sections of this report.
PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
Diamond Hills Plaza is located along the west side of Diamond Bar Boulevard,
between Cold Springs Lane and Fountain Springs Road in the City of Diamond Bar,
California. Figure 1, located at the rear of this letter report, presents a Vicinity Map,
which illustrates the general location of the subject property in the context of the
surrounding street system.
Diamond Hills Plaza is an existing mixed-use retail center comprised of twelve (12)
buildings with a total floor area of 203,181 SF. The current tenant mix, which
7.1.b
Packet Pg. 78
Sunhwa Lee
July 15, 2021
Page 3
N:\4300\2214394 - Eplex at Diamond Hills Plaza, Diamond Bar\Report\4394 Eplex Tutoring Center Parking Demand Analysis
7-15-21.doc
occupies 162,279 SF, includes H-Mart, AAA and a variety of retail/commercial and
restaurant/food uses. The remaining floor area of 40,902 SF consists of 2,814 SF of
vacant retail floor area, 21,440 SF of proposed health club floor area, 5,510 SF of
vacant studio floor area, 1,138 SF of vacant personal services area, and 10,000 SF
Eplex tutoring center. Figure 2 presents an existing aerial photograph of the site and
illustrates the existing buildings and parking areas.
It is our understanding that the Eplex would have a maximum daily capacity of 72
students and a maximum of 16 teachers plus 2 staff on-site. The proposed Project will
operate with eight (8) rooms for afterschool uses with between four (4) to eight (8)
students per class, four (4) rooms for piano lessons with one-on-one lessons, two (2)
rooms for art uses with one-on-one lessons, and four (4) rooms for tutoring uses with
one-on-one lessons. Peak demand for the Project has been estimated with the
assumption that 50%1 of parents will drop off their children and 50% of parents will
wait for their children’s classes to finish. Classes are anticipated to occur between
3PM and 7PM during the weekdays, between 9AM and 1PM on Saturdays with no
classes on Sundays and 9AM and 6PM on summer weekdays. Appendix A shows
detailed weekday, weekend and summer weekday student and staff information for
Eplex on a class-by-class basis and an hour-by-hour basis. It is our understanding the
summer weekend hours and anticipated classes will be the same as non-summer.
Existing Development
Table 1A, located at the end of this letter report, following the figures, presents the
tenant unit/address, most recent development tabulation/tenant mix and associated
floor areas for the center, and hours of operations for the existing tenants. A review of
Table 1A indicates the occupied floor area of 162,279 SF is a mix of retail, restaurant,
office, medical office, bank, day care, studio, and school uses, consisting of the
following:
12,980 SF of retail floor area,
45,000 SF of supermarket/grocery floor area,
1,107 SF of pharmacy floor area
20,449 SF of inline food/restaurant floor area,
1,754 SF of fast food floor are,
59,165 SF of office floor area,
6,841 SF of medical/dental office floor area,
1 The applicant anticipates that about 70% to 90% of parents drop-off their child and leave.
However, conservatively we assumed that only 50% of parents will wait for their children to finish
their lessons.
7.1.b
Packet Pg. 79
Sunhwa Lee
July 15, 2021
Page 4
N:\4300\2214394 - Eplex at Diamond Hills Plaza, Diamond Bar\Report\4394 Eplex Tutoring Center Parking Demand Analysis
7-15-21.doc
10,647 SF of bank floor area,
2,114 SF of service retail floor area, and
2,222 SF of school for studios and non-degree school.
Proposed Project and Other Proposed Tenants
The proposed Project includes the re-tenancy of Suite 2751, formerly occupied by
Orchepia Music School, with Eplex. Based on the proposed changes mentioned
above, the following tenant mix is anticipated.
2,814 SF of retail space in Buildings 2773 and 2807
21,440 SF of health club floor area in Building 2797
5,510 SF of studio floor area in Buildings 2753B, 2775A, and 21335
1,138 SF of personal services floor area in Building 21343
10,000 SF of school floor area in Building 2751
It is our understanding that the Eplex would have a maximum capacity of 72 students
and a maximum of 16 teachers plus 2 staff on-site at any given time. Classes are
anticipated to occur between 3PM and 7PM on weekdays, between 9AM and 1PM on
Saturdays and between 9AM and 6PM on summer weekdays.
Table 1B provides a comparison of the prior Year 2019 versus current Year 2021
tenant information by land use for Diamond Hills Plaza, with vacant suites, prior and
current, highlighted in yellow ( ), and any changes in land uses/tenancies,
whether occupied or vacant, highlighted in orange ( ).
Below highlights the key changes to Table 1B:
Bldg/Unit Year 2019 Land Use Year 2021 Land Use Change
2709 Vacant Inline Food/Restaurant +2,473 SF Restaurant
2751 School Proposed Eplex Tutoring
Center
-10,000 SF School
+ 10,000 SF Tutoring Center
2773 Retail Vacant/Proposed Retail No Change
2797 Vacant Vacant/Proposed Health
Club + 21,440 SF Health Club
2807 Vacant Vacant/Proposed Retail +1,600 SF Retail
21343 Personal Services Vacant/Proposed
Personal Services No Change
21347 Retail Medical/Dental Office -1,194 SF Retail
+1,194 SF Medical/Dental
21385 Day Care Retail -7,450 SF Day Care
+7,450 SF Retail
21335A Studio Vacant/Proposed Studio No Change
21335B Vacant Pharmacy +1,107 SF Pharmacy
7.1.b
Packet Pg. 80
Sunhwa Lee
July 15, 2021
Page 5
N:\4300\2214394 - Eplex at Diamond Hills Plaza, Diamond Bar\Report\4394 Eplex Tutoring Center Parking Demand Analysis
7-15-21.doc
2753B Studio Vacant/Proposed Studio No Change
2775A Studio Vacant/Proposed Studio No Change
Summary
Total Net Changes Retail 7,856 SF
Total Net Changes Pharmacy 1,107 SF
Total Net Changes Food/Restaurant 2,473 SF
Total Net Changes Medical/Dental Office 1,194 SF
Total Net Changes Day Care -7,450 SF
Removal of Orchepia Music School -10,000 SF
Addition of Proposed Health Club 21,440 SF
Addition of Proposed Eplex Tutoring Center 10,000 SF
Based in the information above, the net change results in the net increase of 7,856 SF
of retail, 1,107 SF of pharmacy, 2,473 SF of inline food/restaurant, 1,194 SF of
medical/dental, a decrease of 7,450 SF of daycare, a removal of Orchepia school of
10,000 SF, an addition of proposed health club of 21,440 SF and an addition of
proposed Eplex tutoring center of 10,000 SF.
Parking Supply
Based on a field assessment conducted in April 2019, the existing on-site parking
supply for the center totals 944 spaces. It should be noted based discussions with the
applicant, no changes have been made to the parking supply from the time of the prior
report. Therefore a supply of 944 spaces has been used in this parking analysis. For
detailed study purposes, the parking areas were divided into fourteen (14) zones as
illustrated on Figure 3. Table 2 provides a breakdown of the parking supply provided
within each zone, which are identified as Zones A through N in Table 2. Parking
supply in Table 2 highlights type of parking marked by: Regular, Handicapped, Clean
Air and Time Restricted. No spaces are designated for a specific tenant and/or
employee.
PARKING SUPPLY-DEMAND ANALYSIS
This parking analysis for the mixed-used development involves determining the
expected parking needs, based on the size and type of proposed development
components, versus the parking supply. In general, there are multiple methods that
can be used to estimate the site’s peak parking needs. These methods have been used
in this analysis and include:
Application of City code requirements (which typically treats each tenancy
type as a “stand alone” use at maximum demand).
7.1.b
Packet Pg. 81
Sunhwa Lee
July 15, 2021
Page 6
N:\4300\2214394 - Eplex at Diamond Hills Plaza, Diamond Bar\Report\4394 Eplex Tutoring Center Parking Demand Analysis
7-15-21.doc
Application of shared parking usage patterns by time-of-day (which
recognizes that the parking demand for each tenancy type varies by time of
day and day of week). The shared parking analysis starts with a code
calculation for each tenancy type. For this assessment, current shared parking
methodology outlined in Urban Land Institute’s (ULI) Shared Parking, 3rd
Edition was utilized.
Existing parking demand surveys to determine the aggregate parking demand
of current tenants, combined with application of shared parking evaluation
methodologies for all proposed or existing vacant floor areas in the center.
The shared parking and survey shared methodology are concluded to be applicable to
an existing development such as Diamond Hills Plaza because the individual land use
types (i.e., eating establishments, retail shops, etc.) experience peak demands at
different times of the day, day of the week and month of the year.
CODE PARKING REQUIREMENTS
The code parking calculation for Diamond Hills Plaza is based on the City’s
requirements as outlined in Chapter 22.30 – Off-Street Parking and Loading
Standards of the Municipal Code. The City’s Municipal Code specifies the following
parking requirements, which may or may not be applicable to the proposed Project:
Shopping centers (shall use unsegregated parking area): 1 space for each 200
SF of gross floor area for centers of less than 20,000 SF and 1 space for each 250
SF of gross floor area for centers of 20,000 to 50,000 SF, and 1 space for each
300 SF of gross floor area for centers over 50,000 SF, plus 1 space for each 1,000
SF of outdoor display area.
Retail general merchandise: 1 space for each 250 SF of gross floor area, plus 1
space for each 600 SF of storage area, and 1 space for each company vehicle, plus
1 space for each 1,000 SF of outdoor display area.
Restaurants, café, cafeterias: 1 space for each 75 SF of gross floor area for
patrons, plus 1 space for each 300 SF of service area, plus one space for each 100
SF of outdoor dining area.
Restaurants, fast-food: 1 space for each 100 SF of gross floor area, plus 1 space
for each 100 SF of outdoor dining area.
Offices, administrative, corporate: 1 space for each 400 SF of gross floor area.
Clinics, medical/dental office: 1 space for each 250 SF of gross floor area.
Banks and financial services: 1 space for each 300 SF of gross floor area.
7.1.b
Packet Pg. 82
Sunhwa Lee
July 15, 2021
Page 7
N:\4300\2214394 - Eplex at Diamond Hills Plaza, Diamond Bar\Report\4394 Eplex Tutoring Center Parking Demand Analysis
7-15-21.doc
Personal Services: 1 space for each 250 SF of gross floor area.
Health/fitness clubs: 1 spaces for each 150 SF of gross floor area.
School - Studios and non-degree schools: 1 space for each 200 SF of gross floor
area, plus 1 space for each employee.
Studios for art, dance and martial arts: 1 space for each 150 SF of gross floor
area, plus 1 space for each employee.
Recycling Bins: 3 spaces per direction of city staff.
Based on the review of the Project site plan and the current and proposed tenant mix,
the Project fits the city’s definition of “Shopping Center”. Therefore, a parking ratio
of 1 space per 300 SF has been applied to Project’s commercial retail/food
uses/office/medical office/personal services uses. For Eplex, the parking requirement
of 1 space 200 SF of GFA was applied to Suite 2751 plus the parking requirement of
1 space per each employee (i.e. 10,000 SF x 1/200 + 20 employees x 1 space per
employee). As such, Eplex would have a parking requirement of 70 spaces. For the
Project’s health club component, the City code parking requirement of 1 space per
150 SF of GFA was applied to Suite 2797. The City code parking requirement of 1
space of 150 SF of GFA plus 1 space per each employee was applied to Project’s
studio component (i.e. 5,510 SF x 1/150 + 3 employee x 1 space per employee). For
all other uses, the appropriate parking rate was applied. For pad restaurant uses the
City code requirement of 1 space per 100 SF was applied.
Table 3 presents the code parking requirements for the existing development plus the
proposed tenant mix. As shown, this application of City parking ratios to the existing
and proposed mix of uses of Diamond Hills Plaza results in a total parking requirement
of 827 parking spaces, of which 70 spaces could be attributed to the proposed Project.
With an existing parking supply of 944 spaces, a theoretical code surplus of 117 spaces
is calculated.
However, the specific tenancy mix of the Project provides an opportunity to share
parking spaces based on the utilization profile of each included land use component. The
following section calculates the parking requirements for the Project based on the shared
parking methodology approach.
7.1.b
Packet Pg. 83
Sunhwa Lee
July 15, 2021
Page 8
N:\4300\2214394 - Eplex at Diamond Hills Plaza, Diamond Bar\Report\4394 Eplex Tutoring Center Parking Demand Analysis
7-15-21.doc
SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
Shared Parking Methodology
Accumulated experience in parking demand characteristics indicates that a mixing of
land uses results in an overall parking need that is less than the sum of the individual
peak requirements for each land use. Due to the existing and proposed mixed-use
characteristics of the Center, opportunities to share parking likely occur now and can
be expected to continue with full occupancy and completion of the proposed Project.
The objective of this shared parking analysis is to forecast the peak parking
requirements for the project based on the combined demand patterns of different
tenancy types at the site.
Shared parking calculations recognize that different uses often experience individual
peak parking demands at different times of day, days of the week, or months of the
year. When uses share common parking footprints, the total number of spaces needed
to support the collective whole is determined by adding parking profiles (by time of
day for weekdays versus weekend days), rather than individual peak ratios as
represented in the City of Diamond Bar Municipal Code. In that way, the shared
parking approach starts from the City’s own code ratios and results in the “design
level” parking supply needs of a site.
There it is an important common element between the traditional "code" and the
shared parking calculation methodologies; the peak parking ratios or "highpoint" for
each land use's parking profile typically equals the "code" parking ratio for that use.
The analytical procedures for shared parking analyses are well documented in the
Shared Parking, 3rd publication by the Urban Land Institute (ULI).
Shared parking calculations for the analysis utilize hourly parking accumulations
developed from field studies of single developments in free-standing settings, where
travel by private auto is maximized. These characteristics permit the means for
calculating peak parking needs when land use types are combined. Further, the shared
parking approach will result, at other than peak parking demand times, in an excess
amount of spaces that will service the overall needs of the project.
Key inputs in the shared parking analysis for each land use include:
Peak parking demand by land use for visitors and employees.
Adjustments for alternative modes of transportation, if applicable.
Adjustment for internal capture (captive versus non-captive parking demand),
if applicable.
7.1.b
Packet Pg. 84
Sunhwa Lee
July 15, 2021
Page 9
N:\4300\2214394 - Eplex at Diamond Hills Plaza, Diamond Bar\Report\4394 Eplex Tutoring Center Parking Demand Analysis
7-15-21.doc
Hourly variations of parking demand.
Weekday versus weekend adjustment factors
Monthly adjustment factors to account for variations of parking demand over
the year.
City of Diamond Bar Parking Ratios per Chapter 22.30 – Off-Street Parking
and Loading Standards in the City of Diamond Bar Municipal Code.
It should be noted that the “demand” results of the shared parking calculation are
intended to be used directly for comparison to site supply. No further adjustments or
contingency additions are needed because such contingencies are already built into
the peak parking ratios and time of day profiles used in the calculation.
Shared Parking Ratios and Profiles
The code requirement of 1 space per 300 SF for “Shopping Center” includes inline
food uses and other retail commercial uses which assumes some form of shared
parking between the two. Therefore, to provide a realistic shared parking forecast, the
code requirement of individual uses has been assumed. For this assessment a code
requirement of 4 spaces per 1,000 SF was applied to retail uses. For all other users the
parking ratios mentioned previously in the code section were used directly for each of
the land uses.
The hourly parking demand profiles (expressed in percent of peak demand) utilized in
this analysis and applied to the Center are based on profiles developed by the Urban
Land Institute (ULI) and published in Shared Parking, 3rd Edition. The ULI
publication presents hourly parking demand profiles for several general land uses:
office, retail, restaurant, health club, cinema, residential (Central Business District:
CBD and non-CBD), hotel (consisting of separate factors for guest rooms,
restaurant/lounge, conference room, and convention area). These factors present a
profile of parking demand over time and have been used directly, by land use type, in
the analysis of this project. The ULI profiles of parking demand have been used
directly, by land use type, in the analysis of this site and are applied to the City’s
applicable parking ratio. It should be noted that application of the ULI methodology
applied with City’s applicable parking ratio is considered conservative rather than
using the ULI ratios.
The ULI retail use profiles are applied directly. In doing so, there is an intermediate
step in expressing ULI profiles as a percentage of the week-long peak, thus arriving at
a weekday profile and weekend profile each expressed as a percentage of the baseline
parking ratio (ULI actually starts with separate ratios for weekday and weekend day,
and develops profiles for each; accordingly, we’ve found it more convenient to
7.1.b
Packet Pg. 85
Sunhwa Lee
July 15, 2021
Page 10
N:\4300\2214394 - Eplex at Diamond Hills Plaza, Diamond Bar\Report\4394 Eplex Tutoring Center Parking Demand Analysis
7-15-21.doc
translate both profiles to a percent of expected maximum demand, which, for retail,
turns out to be on a Saturday). The resulting profiles represent the most likely hourly
parking demand profile, and are applied to the City’s retail parking ratio of 4 spaces
per 1000 SF. Peak demand for retail uses occurs between 12:00 PM–2:00 PM on
weekdays, and 1:00 PM–3:00 PM on weekends. The retail profiles were also used for,
art/dance studio, personal service, and school uses.
For supermarket/grocery store uses, the parking profile in the ULI publication was
used and applied to the City’s Parking Code ratio of 4 spaces per 1000 SF of floor are
to forecast its weekday and weekend hourly demand. Peak demand for a
supermarket/grocery store occurs between 4:00 PM–6:00 PM on weekdays, and
11:00 AM–2:00 PM on weekends.
For pharmacy uses, the parking profile in the ULI publication was used and applied to
the City’s Parking Code ratio of 4 spaces per 1000 SF of floor are to forecast its
weekday and weekend hourly demand. Peak demand for a pharmacy occurs between
4:00 PM–6:00 PM on weekdays, and 11:00 AM–2:00 PM on weekends.
The ULI Shared Parking publication includes several categories for restaurants. For
this analysis, the parking profile for fine/casual dining restaurant, family restaurant,
and fast food uses were all utilized as each of the categories match the current
restaurant tenant mix at the Project site. Like the retail profiles, the restaurant profiles
are derived exactly from the ULI baseline. The restaurant-parking ratio utilized in this
analysis exactly matches the City code rate for those tenants where food consumption
is primarily on-site.
According to the Shared Parking publication, family restaurant uses peak demand
occurs between 12:00 PM and 1:00 PM on weekdays and weekends, whereas, fast-
food restaurant uses peak demand occurs between 12:00 PM and 2:00 PM on
weekdays and weekends.
Consistent with the January 2020 Study, the empirically derived parking ratio of 9.01
spaces per 1,000 SF was applied to empirical profiles developed from Crunch Fitness
for the proposed health club uses.
For office uses, the parking profile in the ULI publication was used and applied to the
City’s Parking Code ratio of 1 space per 400 SF of floor are to forecast its weekday
and weekend hourly demand. Peak demand for office occurs between 10:00 AM–
11:00 AM on weekdays, and 11:00 AM–12:00 PM on weekends.
7.1.b
Packet Pg. 86
Sunhwa Lee
July 15, 2021
Page 11
N:\4300\2214394 - Eplex at Diamond Hills Plaza, Diamond Bar\Report\4394 Eplex Tutoring Center Parking Demand Analysis
7-15-21.doc
The medical/dental office profiles were also directly derived from ULI. The peak-
parking ratio for medical/dental office uses exactly equals the City’s Parking Code
requirement of 4 spaces per 1000 SF of floor area. Peak demand for medical/dental
office occurs between 10:00 AM–12:00 PM and 2:00 PM-4:00PM on weekdays and
10:00 AM–12:00 PM on weekends.
For bank uses, the parking profile in the ULI publication was used and applied to the
City’s Parking Code ratio of 1 space per 300 SF of floor are to forecast its weekday
and weekend hourly demand. Peak demand for bank occurs between 10:00 AM–
11:00 AM and 5:00 PM–6:00 PM on weekdays, and 11:00 AM–12:00 PM on
weekends.
Per the direction of City Staff, the existing recycling bins onsite would require 3
parking spaces. To be conservative the 3-space requirement for the recycling bins
were assumed to be occupied throughout the entire day.
For the proposed Project, operational data was provided to calculate the total students
present on an hour-by-hour basis at any given time. A conservative estimate that
50%2 of parents will drop off their children and 50% of parents will wait for their
children’s classes to finish has been assumed. Additionally, it has been assumed that
the 20 staff will be present on site during all weekday operating hours as well as one
hour before and after. As such, the peak parking demand based on operational
characteristics for Eplex results in a 49 spaces requirement. Peak demand for the
proposed Project occurs between 4:00 PM-5:00 PM on weekdays and between 1:00
PM-2:00 PM on Saturdays. Appendix A shows detailed student and staff information
for Eplex.
As noted earlier, no monthly adjustment factors were applied to account for variations
of parking demand over the year to provide a conservative parking demand forecast.
Application of Shared Parking Methodology
Tables 4, 5 and 6 present the overall weekday, weekend and summer weekday
parking demand profiles for the Center based on the shared parking methodology,
assuming full occupancy of the center and including the proposed Project.
2 The applicant anticipates that about 70%-90% of parents drop-off their child and leave. However,
conservatively we assumed that only 50% of parents will wait for their children to finish their
lessons.
7.1.b
Packet Pg. 87
Sunhwa Lee
July 15, 2021
Page 12
N:\4300\2214394 - Eplex at Diamond Hills Plaza, Diamond Bar\Report\4394 Eplex Tutoring Center Parking Demand Analysis
7-15-21.doc
Columns (1) through (11) of these tables present the parking accumulation
characteristics and parking demand of the existing uses for the hours of 6:00 AM to
midnight. Columns (12) through (16) present the re-occupancy of existing vacancies and
future improvements. Columns (17) through (18) presents the expected joint-use parking
demand for the Center on an hourly basis and further presents the hourly parking
surplus/deficiency for the proposed Project compared to the existing parking supply of
944 spaces.
Review of Tables 4, 5 and 6 indicates that the future full occupancy weekday peak
parking demands will occur at 5:00 PM with peak demands of 871 spaces. Based on
the existing parking supply of 944 spaces, the peak demand hours on a weekday will
yield a surplus of 73 spaces. On a weekend the peak parking demand will occur at
12:00 PM with a peak demand of 730 spaces resulting in a surplus of 214 spaces. On
a summer weekday the peak parking demand will occur at 11:00 AM with a peak
demand of 879 spaces resulting in a surplus of 65 spaces. Appendix B contains the
detailed weekday and weekend shared parking worksheets.
Figures 4, 5 and 6 graphically illustrate the weekday, weekend and summer weekday
hourly parking demand forecast for the Project, respectively. Each land use
component and its corresponding hourly Shared Parking demand for various mixes of
uses, which were presented in Tables 4, 5 and 6 are depicted in these two figures
relative to a shared parking supply of 944 spaces. A review of these figures indicate
that the existing parking supply of 944 spaces will adequately accommodate Diamond
Hills Plaza’s weekday, weekend and summer weekday hourly shared parking demand
of all existing and future uses, including the proposed Project, for all morning,
midday, afternoon and evening hours.
Survey Plus Shared Parking Application to the Project and Vacant Floor Area
As part of the Updated Parking Demand Analysis for the Proposed Diamond Hills
Plaza Health Club Project, prepared by LLG Engineers, dated January 29, 2020
hourly surveys of actual parking demand were conducted at the site from 8:00 AM
through 10:00 PM on Friday and again on Saturday, August 2, and August 3, 2019,
respectively. All parked vehicles during each hourly survey round were counted and
recorded. The field study was performed by National Data and Surveying Services
(NDS).
To assess the actual parking demands of Diamond Hills Plaza, in combination with
the Project’s parking requirements, utilization of the actual field study data of the
subject property for the existing tenancies that was collected in August 2019 has been
combined with ULI shared parking techniques applied to the proposed Project and
7.1.b
Packet Pg. 88
Sunhwa Lee
July 15, 2021
Page 13
N:\4300\2214394 - Eplex at Diamond Hills Plaza, Diamond Bar\Report\4394 Eplex Tutoring Center Parking Demand Analysis
7-15-21.doc
vacant floor area/proposed tenant mix assuming full occupancy of the center and
including the proposed Project. Tables 7, 8 and 9 summarize the results of this
approach. Appendix C presents the parking demand counts collected at Diamond
Hills Plaza on a Friday and Saturday.
Since completing the 2019 counts multiple tenant changes have now occurred. To
better understand the tenant changes, Table 1B compares Year 2019 tenant
information to the most current (Year 2021) tenant information. As shown, a various
mix of tenants that were occupied in Year 2019 are now currently vacant, similarly,
some tenants that were vacant in Year 2019 are now currently occupied. Additionally,
there were also some cases where a tenant that was previously occupied in Year 2019,
became re-occupied with the same or different use in Year 2021. Therefore,
adjustments were made to account for all the various changes. Columns (2) through
(6) of Tables 7, 8 and 9 presents these adjustments. It should be noted that for the
prior Orchepia Music School, the demand was estimated with the assumption that for
each of the seven (7) staff, there was one (1) student0F
3, for a peak demand of 14
parking spaces. Similar profiles were used for Orchepia Music School to that which
was developed for the proposed Project1F
4.
Column (1) of Tables 7, 8 and 9 presents a summary of the weekday (Friday) and
weekend (Saturday) parking survey data collected at the site for Parking Zones A
through N, as summarized in Appendix C. Columns (2) through (6) present the tenant
adjustments from Year 2019 to Year 2021. Columns (7) through (8) present the
parking accumulation characteristics of the anticipated occupancy of existing vacant
retail and health club use floor area, respectively. Column (9) presents the expected
joint-use parking demand for the entire site on an hourly basis, while Column (10)
summarizes the hourly parking surplus/deficiency for the Project compared to an
adjusted parking supply of 944 spaces.
As presented in Tables 7, 8 and 9, the forecast peak weekday parking demand would
total 759 parking spaces at 4:00 PM, which results in a minimum functional surplus
of 185 spaces. Peak overall demands on a weekend are forecast at 622 spaces at
11:00 AM, for a minimum functional surplus of 322 spaces. Peak overall demands on
a summer weekday are forecast at 764 spaces at 12:00 PM, for a minimum functional
surplus of 180 spaces. Therefore, we conclude that there is adequate parking on site to
accommodate the existing vacant land uses along with the Proposed Project.
3 Similar to the proposed Project, a conservative assumption that 50% of parents will drop-off their
children and 50% of parents will wait for their children’s classes to finish.
4 For the weekend, the assumed profiles are 50% capacity at opening and closing hours with 100%
capacity at all other times.
7.1.b
Packet Pg. 89
Sunhwa Lee
July 15, 2021
Page 14
N:\4300\2214394 - Eplex at Diamond Hills Plaza, Diamond Bar\Report\4394 Eplex Tutoring Center Parking Demand Analysis
7-15-21.doc
Figures 7, 8 and 9 graphically illustrate the weekday, weekend and summer weekday
hourly parking demand forecast for the Project, respectively. Each land use
component and its corresponding hourly Shared Parking demand for various mixes of
uses, which were presented in Tables 7, 8 and 9, are depicted in these two figures
relative to a shared parking supply of 944 spaces. A review of these figures indicate
that the existing parking supply of 944 spaces will adequately accommodate Diamond
Hills Plaza’s weekday and weekend hourly shared parking demand of all existing and
future uses, including the proposed Project, for all morning, midday, afternoon and
evening hours.
Based on LLG’s experience, the surpluses identified in the shared parking analysis
finding coupled with the functional parking surplus indicated by the “blended” results
indicate an adequate parking supply following full center occupancy with the
proposed improvements.
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
1. Diamond Hills Plaza is an established mixed-used retail center with a total floor
area of 203,181 square-feet (SF). The current tenant mix, which occupies
162,298 SF, includes H-Mart, AAA and a variety of retail/commercial and
restaurant/food uses. The remaining floor area of 40,902 SF consists of a mix of
retail/commercial, health club, studio, and school floor area. It is our
understanding that the proposed Project includes the re-occupancy of 10,000 SF
of vacant school designation space (former Orchepia Music School) with Eplex,
a tutoring center for art, music, ballet and academics. The existing parking
supply for Diamond Hills Plaza totals 944 spaces.
2. Direct application of City parking codes to the existing and proposed mix of uses
results in a total parking requirement of 827 parking spaces. When compared
against the existing parking supply of 944 spaces the Center has a theoretical
surplus of 117 spaces.
3. Given the mix of tenancies within the existing retail/commercial center, a shared
parking analysis has been prepared and indicates that the available shared parking
supply of 944 spaces will be sufficient to meet the projected peak parking demands
of existing and proposed uses. The weekday scenario would result in a peak
demand of 871 spaces while the weekend scenario would result in a peak demand
of 730 spaces. The summer weekday scenario would result in a peak demand of
879 spaces. When compared to the existing parking supply of 944 spaces, the
7.1.b
Packet Pg. 90
Sunhwa Lee
July 15, 2021
Page 15
N:\4300\2214394 - Eplex at Diamond Hills Plaza, Diamond Bar\Report\4394 Eplex Tutoring Center Parking Demand Analysis
7-15-21.doc
weekday and weekend would result in a surplus of 73 spaces, 214 spaces and 65
spaces, respectively.
4. A “blended” analysis of actual parking demand for existing occupancies and a
shared parking approach for proposed uses indicates that the future minimum
functional surplus at Diamond Hills Plaza will be much greater. For the proposed
tenancy mix, the weekday, weekend and weekday summer demand will have a
minimum functional surplus of 185 spaces, 322 spaces and 180 spaces,
respectively. Therefore, we conclude that there is adequate parking on site to
accommodate the existing vacant land uses along with the Proposed Project.
* * * * * * * * * *
We appreciate the opportunity to prepare this analysis for the proposed Eplex at
Diamond Hills Plaza and the City of Diamond Bar. Should you have any questions or
need additional assistance, please do not hesitate to call me at (949) 825-6175.
Very truly yours,
Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers
Richard E. Barretto, P.E.
Principal
cc: Shane S. Green, P.E., LLG
Attachments
7.1.b
Packet Pg. 91
7.1.bPacket Pg. 92
7.1.bPacket Pg. 93
7.1.bPacket Pg. 94
7.1.bPacket Pg. 95
7.1.bPacket Pg. 96
7.1.bPacket Pg. 97
7.1.bPacket Pg. 98
7.1.bPacket Pg. 99
7.1.bPacket Pg. 100
N:\4300\2214394 - Eplex at Diamond Hills Plaza, Diamond Bar\Report\4394 Eplex Tutoring Center Parking Demand Analysis 7-15-21.doc TABLE 1A EXISTING AND PROPOSED PROJECT DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY [1] EPLEX AT DIAMOND HILLS PLAZA, DIAMOND BAR Building Tenant Land Use Hours of OperationRetailSupermarket/Grocery PharmacyInline Food/RestaurantFast-Food Restaurant Health Club OfficeMedical/Dental Office Bank StudioPersonal Services SchoolRecycling Facility2705Diamond Star Association OfficeM-F: 8am - 5pm, Sat/Sun: Closed36,24536,245SF2709Buns & Dums Inline Food/RestaurantN/A2,4732,473SF2711Chase BankM-F: 9am - 6pm, Sat: 9am - 4pm, Sun: Closed3,4313,431SFATM-- Bank--150150SF2753ABait Clothing RetailM-Th: 11am - 7pm, F/Sat: 11am - 8pm, Sun: 11am - 6pm2,2202,220SF2755Amazing Beauty Salon Personal ServicesN/A900 900SF2757Kumon SchoolM/W/Th: 10am - 6pm, Tu/F: 10am - 7pm, Sat/Sun: Closed900 900SF2759Boba Tea Shop Inline Food/RestaurantN/A903903SF2761Teatitude Inline Food/RestaurantM-Sun: 11am - 9pm1,1121,112SF2763-2765101 Café Inline Food/RestaurantM-Sun: 11am - 9:30pm1,6981,698 SF2767Qing Jia Mo Inline Food/RestaurantN/A907907SF2769Tasty Box Inline Food/RestaurantM-Sun: 11am - 8pm1,2121,212SF2771Optometry Dr. Ami Patel Medical/Dental OfficeTu: 11am - 7pm, W-F: 10am - 6pm, Sat: 9am - 4pm, Sun/M: Closed1,2141,214SF2775BRed Persimmon Nails Personal ServicesM-Sat: 9:30am - 7pm, Sun: 10am - 5pm1,214 1,214SF2777Pho Hana Inline Food/RestaurantM-Sun: 10am - 10pm1,7591,759SF2779Curry India Bistro Inline Food/RestaurantM-Sun: 11am - 9pm2,9992,999 SF2781/2783HSBC BankM-W/F: 9am - 5pm, Th: 9am - 6pm, Sat: 9am - 1pm, Sun: Closed5,0005,000SF2785California Luxury Living OfficeN/A2,9202,920SF2801Palace Beauty RetailM-Sun: 10am - 8pm2,4002,400SF2803Hot Pot Inline Food/RestaurantN/A2,4002,400SF2809Bank of Hope BankM-Th: 9am - 5pm, F: 9am - 6pm, Sat: 9am - 1pm, Sun: Closed2,0662,066 SF2825H-Mart Supermarket/GroceryM-Sun: 8am - 10pm45,00045,000SF2825ArmBar Recycling Center INC Recycling BinM-Sat: 9am - 5pm, Sun: 10am - 2pm-- --SF2837Starbucks Fast-Food RestaurantM-Th: 5am - 9pm, F: 5am - 10:30pm, Sat: 5:30am - 10pm, Sun: 5:30am - 8:30pm1,7541,754SF2839AYoung Dong Tofu House Inline Food/RestaurantM-Sun: 11am - 9:30pm2,2052,205SF2839BDim Sum Restaurant Inline Food/RestaurantN/A1,4081,408 SF2841ABDB Smiles Medical/Dental OfficeM: 8:30am - 6pm, Tu/Th: 9am - 6pm, W: 8:30am - 7pm, F: 8:30am - 4:30pm, Sat: 7am - 3pm, Sun: Closed3,0383,038SF2841CKokio Chicken Inline Food/RestaurantM/Tu: 11:30am - 10:30pm, W-Sat: 11:30am - 11:30pm, Sun: 12pm - 10:30pm1,3731,373SF2843AAA OfficeM-F: 9am - 5pm, Sat: 8am - 4pm, Sun: Closed20,00020,000SF21335BDiamond Pharmacy PharmacyN/A1,1071,107SF21341Masil RetailM-Sat: 11am - 8pm, Sun: 2pm - 7pm910910SF21345Amor Skin Clinic Medical/Dental OfficeM-Sat: 9am - 8pm, Sun: Closed1,3951,395 SF21347Pin Shen Health Medical/Dental OfficeN/A1,1941,194SF21349Pine Edu SchoolM: 2:30pm - 8:30pm, Tu-Th: 12:30pm - 8:30pm, Sat: 8:30am - 4:30pm, F/Sun: Closed1,322 1,322SF21385Steel Lotus RetailM-F: 11am - 6pm, Sat: 12pm - 4pm, Sun: Closed7,4507,450 SFEXISTING SUBTOTAL 12,980 45,000 1,107 20,449 1,754 0 59,165 6,841 10,647 0 2,114 2,222 -- 162,279 SF2751Proposed Eplex Tutoring Center SchoolN/A10,000 10,000SF2753BVacant/Proposed Studio StudioN/A2,280 2,280SF2773Vacant/Proposed Retail RetailN/A1,2141,214SF2775AVacant/Proposed Studio StudioN/A1,214 1,214SF2797Vacant/Proposed Health Club Health ClubN/A21,44021,440SF2807Vacant/Proposed Retail RetailN/A1,6001,600 SF21335Vacant/Proposed Studio StudioN/A2,016 2,016SF21343Vacant/Prposed Personal Services Personal ServicesN/A1,138 1,138 SFVACANT/PROPOSED SUBTOTAL 2,814 0 0 0 0 21,440 0 0 0 5,510 1,138 10,000 -- 40,902 SFTOTAL 15,794 45,000 1,107 20,449 1,754 21,440 59,165 6,841 10,647 5,510 3,252 12,222 -- 203,181 SFPERCENT LAND USE MIX7.8% 22.1% 0.5% 10.1% 0.9% 10.6% 29.1% 3.4% 5.2% 2.7% 1.6% 6.0% 0.0%Notes:[1] Source: Diamond Hills Plaza, tenant information supplemented with field observations conducted by LLG in April 2019.100.0%Building Size (SF)7.1.bPacket Pg. 101
N:\4300\2214394 - Eplex at Diamond Hills Plaza, Diamond Bar\Report\4394 Eplex Tutoring Center Parking Demand Analysis 7-15-21.doc
TABLE 1B
PRIOR AND EXISTING TENANT/LAND USE SUMMARY [1]
EPLEX AT DIAMOND HILLS PLAZA, DIAMOND BAR
Bldg/Unit
Prior
Year 2019 Tenant Information
Current
Year 2021 Tenant Information Bulding Size (SF)
2705 Office Office 36,245 SF
2709 Vacant Fast-Food Restaurant Inline Food/Restaurant 2,473 SF
2711 Bank Bank 3,431 SF
2751 School Proposed Eplex Tutoring Center 10,000 SF
2755 Personal Services Personal Services 900 SF
2757 School School 900 SF
2759 Inline Food/Restaurant Inline Food/Restaurant 903 SF
2761 Inline Food/Restaurant Inline Food/Restaurant 1,112 SF
2763 Inline Food/Restaurant Inline Food/Restaurant 1,698 SF
2767 Inline Food/Restaurant Inline Food/Restaurant 907 SF
2769 Inline Food/Restaurant Inline Food/Restaurant 1,212 SF
2771 Medical/Dental Office Medical/Dental Office 1,214 SF
2773 Retail Vacant/Proposed Retail 1,214 SF
2777 Inline Food/Restaurant Inline Food/Restaurant 1,759 SF
2779 Inline Food/Restaurant Inline Food/Restaurant 2,999 SF
2785 Office Office 2,920 SF
2797 Vacant/Proposed Health Club Vacant/Proposed Health Club 21,440 SF
2801 Retail Retail 2,400 SF
2803 Inline Food/Restaurant Inline Food/Restaurant 2,400 SF
2807 Vacant Retail Vacant/Proposed Retail 1,600 SF
2809 Bank Bank 2,066 SF
2825 Supermarket/Grocery Supermarket/Grocery 45,000 SF
2825 Recycling Bin Recycling Bin -- SF
2837 Fast-Food Restaurant Fast-Food Restaurant 1,754 SF
2843 Office Office 20,000 SF
21341 Retail Retail 910 SF
21343 Personal Services Vacant/Prposed Personal Services 1,138 SF
21345 Medical/Dental Office Medical/Dental Office 1,395 SF
21347 Retail Medical/Dental Office 1,194 SF
21349 School School 1,322 SF
21385 Day Care Retail 7,450 SF
21335A Studio Vacant/Proposed Studio 2,016 SF
21335B Vacant Retail Pharmacy 1,107 SF
2753A Retail Retail 2,220 SF
2753B Studio Vacant/Proposed Studio 2,280 SF
2775A Studio Vacant/Proposed Studio 1,214 SF
2775B Personal Services Personal Services 1,214 SF
2781/2783 Bank Bank 5,000 SF
2839A Inline Food/Restaurant Inline Food/Restaurant 2,205 SF
2839B Inline Food/Restaurant Inline Food/Restaurant 1,408 SF
2841B Medical/Dental Office Medical/Dental Office 3,038 SF
2841C Inline Food/Restaurant Inline Food/Restaurant 1,373 SF
ATM Bank Bank
150 SF
SUMMARY:
TOTAL OCCUPIED RETAIL SF 12,980 SF
TOTAL OCCUPIED SUPERMARK/GROCERY SF 45,000 SF
TOTAL OCCUPIED PHARMACY SF 1,107 SF
TOTAL OCCUPIED INLINE FOOD/RESTAURANT SF 20,449 SF
TOTAL OCCUPIED FAST-FOOD RESTAURANT SF 1,754 SF
TOTAL OCCUPIED OFFICE SF 59,165 SF
TOTAL OCCUPIED MEDICAL/DENTAL OFFICE SF 6,841 SF
TOTAL OCCUPIED BANK SF 10,647 SF
TOTAL OCCUPIED PERSONAL SERVICES SF 2,114 SF
TOTAL OCCUPIED SCHOOL SF 2,222 SF
TOTAL VACANT/PROPOSED RETAIL SF 2,814 SF
TOTAL VACANT/PROPOSED HEALTH CLUB SF 21,440 SF
TOTAL OVACANT/PROPOSED STUDIO SF 5,510 SF
TOTAL VACANT/PROPOSED PERSONAL SERVICES SF 1,138 SF
TOTAL VACANT/PROPOSED SCHOOL SF 10,000 SF
TOTAL SITE SF 203,181 SF
Notes:
[1] Source: Diamond Hills Plaza, tenant information supplemented with field observations conducted by LLG in April 2019.
7.1.b
Packet Pg. 102
N:\4300\2214394 - Eplex at Diamond Hills Plaza, Diamond Bar\Report\4394 Eplex Tutoring Center Parking Demand Analysis 7-15-21.doc
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF EXISTING PARKING SUPPLY [1]
EPLEX AT DIAMOND HILLS PLAZA, DIAMOND BAR
Zone Regular Handicapped Clean Air Time Restricted Total [2]
A 53 1 0 0 54
B 15 2 0 0 17
C 62 1 0 0 63
D 89 2 0 0 91
E 60 0 0 0 60
F 120 0 0 0 120
G 35 2 0 2 39
H 82 0 0 0 82
I 10 2 3 0 15
J 78 2 0 0 80
K 20 2 0 0 22
L 72 26 0 6 104
M 39 0 0 0 39
N 158 0 0 0 158
TOTAL 893 40 3 8 944
Notes:
[1] Parking inventory of supply was conducted in April 2019.
[2] Plaza contains 4 cart return spaces, these have been excluded from the total parking supply.
7.1.b
Packet Pg. 103
N:\4300\2214394 - Eplex at Diamond Hills Plaza, Diamond Bar\Report\4394 Eplex Tutoring Center Parking Demand Analysis 7-15-21.doc
TABLE 3
CITY CODE PARKING REQUIREMENTS [1]
EPLEX AT DIAMOND HILLS PLAZA, DIAMOND BAR
Land Use City of Diamond Bar Code Parking Ratio
Spaces
Required
Existing Tenant Mix
Retail 12,980 SF 1 space per 300 SF of GFA for centers over 50,000 SF, plus 1 space per 1,000 SF of
outdoor display area.43
Supermarket/Grocery 45,000 SF 1 space per 300 SF of GFA for centers over 50,000 SF, plus 1 space per 1,000 SF of
outdoor display area.150
Pharmacy 1,107 SF 1 space per 300 SF of GFA for centers over 50,000 SF, plus 1 space per 1,000 SF of
outdoor display area.4
Inline Food/Restaurant 20,449 SF 1 space per 300 SF of GFA for centers over 50,000 SF, plus 1 space per 1,000 SF of
outdoor display area.68
Fast-Food Restaurant 1,754 SF 1 space per 100 SF of GFA plus 1 space per 100 SF of outdoor dining area. 18
Office 59,165 SF 1 space per 300 SF of GFA for centers over 50,000 SF, plus 1 space per 1,000 SF of
outdoor display area.197
Medical-Dental Office 6,841 SF 1 space per 300 SF of GFA for centers over 50,000 SF, plus 1 space per 1,000 SF of
outdoor display area.23
Bank 10,647 SF 1 space per 300 SF of GFA for centers over 50,000 SF, plus 1 space per 1,000 SF of
outdoor display area.35
Personal Services 2,114 SF 1 space per 300 SF of GFA for centers over 50,000 SF, plus 1 space per 1,000 SF of
outdoor display area.7
School 2,222 SF 1 space per 200 SF of GFA plus 1 space per each employee. [2] 13
Recycling Facility -- -- 3 spaces [3] 3
Vacant/Proposed Project
Vacant/Proposed Retail 2,814 SF 1 space per 300 SF of GFA for centers over 50,000 SF, plus 1 space per 1,000 SF of
outdoor display area.9
Vacant/Proposed Health Club 21,440 SF 1 space per 150 SF of GFA 143
Vacant/Proposed Studio 5,510 SF 1 space per 150 SF of GFA plus 1 space per each employee. [4] 40
Vacant/Proposed Personal Services 1,138 SF 1 space per 300 SF of GFA for centers over 50,000 SF, plus 1 space per 1,000 SF of
outdoor display area.4
Proposed Eplex Tutoring Center 10,000 SF 1 space per 200 SF of GFA plus 1 space per each employee. [5] 70
561
266
827
944
117
Notes:
[1] Source: City of Diamond Bar Municipal Code, Sec. 22.30.040 - Number of Parking Spaces Required.
[2] Based on research/information, there are 2 employees.
[4] Based on reasearch/information, there are 3 employees.
[5] The previous Orchepia Music School had 7 employees. The proposed Eplex will have 20 employees, resulting in a next increase of 13 employees.
[3] Per City staff direction the Recycling Facility has a parking requirement of 3 spaces.
C. TOTAL PARKING CODE REQUIREMENT BASED ON FULL OCCUPANCY
D. PROPOSED PARKING SUPPLY
E. PARKING SURPLUS/DEFICIENCY (+/-) BASED ON FULL OCCUPANCY (D - C)
B. TOTAL VACANT/PROPOSED PARKING CODE REQUIREMENT
Size
A. TOTAL OCCUPIED PARKING CODE REQUIREMENT
7.1.b
Packet Pg. 104
N:\4300\2214394 - Eplex at Diamond Hills Plaza, Diamond Bar\Report\4394 Eplex Tutoring Center Parking Demand Analysis 7-15-21.doc TABLE 4 WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1] EXISTING USES PLUS PROPOSED PROJECT EPLEX AT DIAMOND HILLS PLAZA, DIAMOND BAR Land Use RetailSupermarket/GroceryPharmacyInline Food/RestaurantFast-Food RestaurantOfficeMedical/Dental OfficeBank Personal Services School Recycling Facility Proposed RetailProposed Health Club [3]Proposed StudioProposed Personal ServicesProposed Eplex Tutoring CenterSize 12.980 KSF 45.000 KSF 1.107 KSF 20.449 KSF 1.754 KSF 59.165 KSF 6.841 KSF 10.647 KSF 2.114 KSF 2.222 KSF 3 Bins 2.814 KSF 21.440 KSF 5.510 KSF 1.138 KSF10.000 KSFTotalPkg Rate[2] 4 /KSF 4 /KSF 4 /KSF 10 /KSF 2.5 /KSF 4 /KSF 3.3 /KSF 4 /KSF 4 /KSF 9.01 /KSF 4 /KSF Spaces = Comparison w/Gross 52 Spc. 180 Spc. 4 Spc. 269 Spc. 18 Spc. 148 Spc. 27 Spc. 35 Spc. 8 Spc. 13 Spc. 3 Spc. 11 Spc. 193 Spc. 40 Spc. 5 Spc. 49 Spc. 1,055 Parking SupplySpacesShared944 SpacesNumber of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Parking SurplusTime of Day Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Demand (Deficiency)6:00 AM166 7787:00 AM314 6308:00 AM563 3819:00 AM721 22310:00 AM815 12911:00 AM833 11112:00 PM821 1231:00 PM821 1232:00 PM770 1743:00 PM807 1374:00 PM833 1115:00 PM871 736:00 PM780 1647:00 PM669 2758:00 PM527 4179:00 PM297 64710:00 PM220 72411:00 PM226 71812:00 AM89 855Notes:[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020.[3] Crunch Fitness in Diamond Bar was not open during the entire desired parking demand analysis times. Dashes (--) signify times when Crunch Fitness was closed.25313525421151151220168 619871761431722072342452692451100144443233444361414385798116130157165172[2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code.13817303847474541410112241433933221040175180180174143945913113120822022018181610124610101015149150225252774104207012914814111812114013411883352023188427142527270019333525252529000000000000003013123343473610371237123712371137113711371136103683363223023003066109831 193 64 176 136 168 228 149 2910 97 3610 98 3610 97 359 160 329 181 329 178 329 183 338 143 307 106 255--172--70--30--000001010304050504184344464434214183030100000---- -- -- -- 7.1.bPacket Pg. 105
N:\4300\2214394 - Eplex at Diamond Hills Plaza, Diamond Bar\Report\4394 Eplex Tutoring Center Parking Demand Analysis 7-15-21.doc TABLE 5 WEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1] EXISTING USES PLUS PROPOSED PROJECT EPLEX AT DIAMOND HILLS PLAZA, DIAMOND BAR Land Use RetailSupermarket/GroceryPharmacyInline Food/RestaurantFast-Food RestaurantOfficeMedical/Dental OfficeBank Personal Services School Recycling Facility Proposed RetailProposed Health Club [3]Proposed StudioProposed Personal ServicesProposed Eplex Tutoring CenterSize 12.980 KSF 45.000 KSF 1.107 KSF 20.449 KSF 1.754 KSF 59.165 KSF 6.841 KSF 10.647 KSF 2.114 KSF 2.222 KSF 3 Bins 2.814 KSF 21.440 KSF 5.510 KSF 1.138 KSF10.000 KSFTotalPkg Rate[2] 4/KSF 4/KSF 4/KSF 10/KSF 2.5/KSF 4/KSF 3.3/KSF 4/KSF 4/KSF 9.01/KSF 4/KSFSpaces = Comparison w/Gross 52 Spc. 180 Spc. 4 Spc. 269 Spc. 18 Spc. 148 Spc. 27 Spc. 35 Spc. 8 Spc. 13 Spc. 3 Spc. 11 Spc. 193 Spc. 40 Spc. 5 Spc. 49 Spc. 1,055 Parking SupplySpacesShared944 SpacesNumber of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Parking SurplusTime of Day Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Demand (Deficiency)6:00 AM65 8797:00 AM158 7868:00 AM383 5619:00 AM541 40310:00 AM664 28011:00 AM709 23512:00 PM730 2141:00 PM657 2872:00 PM601 3433:00 PM505 4394:00 PM509 4355:00 PM535 4096:00 PM447 4977:00 PM366 5788:00 PM330 6149:00 PM202 74210:00 PM142 80211:00 PM83 86112:00 AM45 899Notes:[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020.[2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code.[3] Crunch Fitness in Diamond Bar was not open during the entire desired parking demand analysis times. Dashes (--) signify times when Crunch Fitness was closed.440194896138172180120014013200483212 25 1717 133 4 9 25338 240 11 13 271329 192 62348 240 16 15 27 2750 263 18418013 14 2652 230 184120052 183 16176 418090050 116 111734 50048 128 101694 30044 170 111524 10010041 194 1689 237 194 15611 00035 182 9461 00000028 94 629 118 80 4110 000656290 0000000351600030133435736103712381338133813381337123711371136936934733431130030--108344413756228602910 62 3711 69 3811 69 4011 81 4011 68 3810 73 3798534939318--288--276--214--141--40--0300000112316416516515100000----------51250505040404040 7.1.bPacket Pg. 106
N:\4300\2214394 - Eplex at Diamond Hills Plaza, Diamond Bar\Report\4394 Eplex Tutoring Center Parking Demand Analysis 7-15-21.doc TABLE 6 SUMMER WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1] EXISTING USES PLUS PROPOSED PROJECT EPLEX AT DIAMOND HILLS PLAZA, DIAMOND BAR Land Use RetailSupermarket/GroceryPharmacyInline Food/RestaurantFast-Food RestaurantOfficeMedical/Dental OfficeBank Personal Services School Recycling Facility Proposed RetailProposed Health Club [3]Proposed StudioProposed Personal ServicesProposed Eplex Tutoring CenterSize 12.980 KSF 45.000 KSF 1.107 KSF 20.449 KSF 1.754 KSF 59.165 KSF 6.841 KSF 10.647 KSF 2.114 KSF 2.222 KSF 3 Bins 2.814 KSF 21.440 KSF 5.510 KSF 1.138 KSF10.000 KSFTotalPkg Rate[2] 4 /KSF 4 /KSF 4 /KSF 10 /KSF 2.5 /KSF 4 /KSF 3.3 /KSF 4 /KSF 4 /KSF 9.01 /KSF 4 /KSF Spaces = Comparison w/Gross 52 Spc. 180 Spc. 4 Spc. 269 Spc. 18 Spc. 148 Spc. 27 Spc. 35 Spc. 8 Spc. 13 Spc. 3 Spc. 11 Spc. 193 Spc. 40 Spc. 5 Spc. 49 Spc. 1,055 Parking SupplySpacesShared944 SpacesNumber of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Parking SurplusTime of Day Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Demand (Deficiency)6:00 AM166 7787:00 AM314 6308:00 AM581 3639:00 AM764 18010:00 AM861 8311:00 AM879 6512:00 PM870 741:00 PM866 782:00 PM795 1493:00 PM799 1454:00 PM813 1315:00 PM850 946:00 PM777 1677:00 PM651 2938:00 PM527 4179:00 PM297 64710:00 PM220 72411:00 PM226 71812:00 AM89 855Notes:[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020.[3] Crunch Fitness in Diamond Bar was not open during the entire desired parking demand analysis times. Dashes (--) signify times when Crunch Fitness was closed.1140---- -- -- --76 133813066100400000202001172 48571309830143 23 1 193 6 1 1870 25 19 1 2207 617 98 230 116 23 4 176 13 1 43129 25 33 3 4234 1038 130 33 6 168 22 3 46148 27 35 4 746141 27 25 6 10269 1847 157 33 8 149 29 4245 153109736549118 14 25 7 12245 1847 165 445 172 43109836545121 25 25 7 12151 1641 175 43109735443140 27 29 7 1226134 27 25 7 11131 1041 180 43 9 160 32 4131 103 9 181 32 4 26118 25 31 7 11208 1041 180 443 174 43 9 178 32 4 2283 23 35 7 11220 1539 143 33 9 183 33 4 1835 18 0 7 11020 8 0 6 10220 933 94 23 8 143 30 4220 143 7 106 25 3 074068168 622 59 110 36 135--173040036151 4414032--7101002200000271 1014030--30198 2[2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code.30--000000007.1.bPacket Pg. 107
N:\4300\2214394 - Eplex at Diamond Hills Plaza, Diamond Bar\Report\4394 Eplex Tutoring Center Parking Demand Analysis 7-15-21.doc TABLE 7 WEEKDAY SURVEY PLUS SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1] EXISTING USES PLUS PROPOSED PROJECT EPLEX AT DIAMOND HILLS PLAZA, DIAMOND BAR Land UseExisting Center (Year 2019)Net Change RetailNet Change PharmacyNet Change Inline Food/RestaurantNet Change Medical/Dental OfficeNet Change Day CarePrior Orchepia Music SchoolProposed Health Club [3]Proposed Eplex Tutoring CenterSize 7.856 KSF 1.107 KSF 2.473 KSF 1.194 KSF -7.450 KSF 10.000 KSF 21.440 KSF 10.000 KSFTotalPkg Rate[2] 4 /KSF 4 /KSF 4 /KSF 9.01 /KSF Spaces = Comparison w/Gross 31 Spc. 4 Spc. 26 Spc. 5 Spc. -22 Spc. -14 Spc. 193 Spc. 49 Spc. 272 Parking SupplySpacesShared944 SpacesNumber of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Parking SurplusTime of Day Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Demand (Deficiency)8:00 AM413 5319:00 AM458 48610:00 AM647 29711:00 AM694 25012:00 PM715 2291:00 PM697 2472:00 PM629 3153:00 PM736 2084:00 PM759 1855:00 PM752 1926:00 PM639 3057:00 PM509 4358:00 PM452 4929:00 PM264 68010:00 PM142 802Notes:[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020.[2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code.[3] Crunch Fitness in Diamond Bar was not open during the entire desired parking demand analysis times. Dashes (--) signify times when Crunch Fitness was closed.[4] Existing parking counts conducted by National Data & Surveying Services (NDS) on Friday, August 2, 2019.--000000(10)(14)(13)(6)(7)(7)0000--0000001834464321180098193176168106----178183143HourlyParkingDemand [4]205265444505571552(15)(14)(19)9716018114997ActualObserved487527523504601500121132160 0233203210(1)303233212(5)31125 3 21 3 (10)40024 3 20 4 (18)24 3 12 5 (22)24312527 4 15 5 (14)28 4 24 5 (14)28426322 3 24 5 (14)18 3 23 5 (14)1012055 0 17 5 (12)-- --7.1.bPacket Pg. 108
N:\4300\2214394 - Eplex at Diamond Hills Plaza, Diamond Bar\Report\4394 Eplex Tutoring Center Parking Demand Analysis 7-15-21.doc TABLE 8 WEEKEND SURVEY PLUS SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1] EXISTING USES PLUS PROPOSED PROJECT EPLEX AT DIAMOND HILLS PLAZA, DIAMOND BAR Land UseExisting Center (Year 2019)Net Change RetailNet Change PharmacyNet Change Inline Food/RestaurantNet Change Medical/Dental OfficeNet Change Day CarePrior Orchepia Music SchoolProposed Health Club [3]Proposed Eplex Tutoring CenterSize 7.856 KSF 1.107 KSF 2.473 KSF 1.194 KSF -7.450 KSF 10.000 KSF 21.440 KSF 10.000 KSFTotalPkg Rate[2] 4 /KSF 4 /KSF 4 /KSF 9.01 /KSFSpaces = Comparison w/Gross 31 Spc. 4 Spc. 26 Spc. 5 Spc. -22 Spc. -14 Spc. 193 Spc. 49 Spc. 272 Parking SupplySpacesShared944 SpacesNumber of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Parking SurplusTime of Day Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Demand (Deficiency)8:00 AM218 7269:00 AM356 58810:00 AM493 45111:00 AM622 32212:00 PM619 3251:00 PM580 3642:00 PM537 4073:00 PM493 4514:00 PM493 4515:00 PM477 4676:00 PM415 5297:00 PM312 6328:00 PM257 6879:00 PM184 76010:00 PM78 866Notes:[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020.[2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code.[3] Crunch Fitness in Diamond Bar was not open during the entire desired parking demand analysis times. Dashes (--) signify times when Crunch Fitness was closed.[4] Existing parking counts conducted by National Data & Surveying Services (NDS) on Saturday, August 3, 2019.(14)(14)(14)(14)(7)00000--(7)(14)(14)(14)(14)0000--12161616151200000--------7385396981686062694456ParkingDemand [4]ActualObservedHourly11180058021173901553180 0215233190 0267243190 0330263170 0353294120 0389304110 0394314180 0417314220 0456304263 0486294235 0497233235 0377183195 0253101135 0140-- -- 7.1.bPacket Pg. 109
N:\4300\2214394 - Eplex at Diamond Hills Plaza, Diamond Bar\Report\4394 Eplex Tutoring Center Parking Demand Analysis 7-15-21.doc TABLE 9 SUMMER WEEKDAY SURVEY PLUS SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1] EXISTING USES PLUS PROPOSED PROJECT EPLEX AT DIAMOND HILLS PLAZA, DIAMOND BAR Land UseExisting Center (Year 2019)Net Change RetailNet Change PharmacyNet Change Inline Food/RestaurantNet Change Medical/Dental OfficeNet Change Day CarePrior Orchepia Music SchoolProposed Health Club [3]Proposed Eplex Tutoring CenterSize 7.856 KSF 1.107 KSF 2.473 KSF 1.194 KSF -7.450 KSF 10.000 KSF 21.440 KSF 10.000 KSFTotalPkg Rate[2] 4 /KSF 4 /KSF 4 /KSF 9.01 /KSF Spaces = Comparison w/Gross 31 Spc. 4 Spc. 26 Spc. 5 Spc. -22 Spc. -14 Spc. 193 Spc. 49 Spc. 272 Parking SupplySpacesShared944 SpacesNumber of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Parking SurplusTime of Day Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Demand [5] (Deficiency)8:00 AM431 5139:00 AM501 44310:00 AM693 25111:00 AM740 20412:00 PM764 1801:00 PM742 2022:00 PM654 2903:00 PM728 2164:00 PM739 2055:00 PM731 2136:00 PM636 3087:00 PM491 4538:00 PM452 4929:00 PM264 68010:00 PM142 802Notes:[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020.[2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code.[3] Crunch Fitness in Diamond Bar was not open during the entire desired parking demand analysis times. Dashes (--) signify times when Crunch Fitness was closed.[4] Existing parking counts conducted by National Data & Surveying Services (NDS) on Friday, August 2, 2019.Actual -- -- -- --ObservedHourlyParkingDemand [4]5 (12) 0 193 18205 5 0 175 (19) 0 176 43265 10 1 205 (14) 0 168 46444 18 3 235 (14) 0 149 46505 22 3 243 (14) 0 97 49571 28 4 265 (14) 0 98 45552 28 4 245 (14) (10) 97 43487 27 4 155 (15) (14) 160 26527 24 3 125 (22) (13) 181 26523 24 3 124 (18) (6) 178 22504 24 3 203 (10) (7) 183 18400 25 3 212 (5) (7) 143 0311 23 3 210 (1) 0 106 0303 20 3 21000--0233 13 2 16000--0121 6 0 15 7.1.bPacket Pg. 110
N:\4300\2214394 - Eplex at Diamond Hills Plaza, Diamond Bar\Report\4394 Eplex Tutoring Center Parking Demand Analysis 7-15-21.doc
APPENDIX A
EPLEX STUDENT AND EMPLOYEE PARKING DEMAND
7.1.b
Packet Pg. 111
Room 1 Room 2 Room 3 Room 4 Room 5 Room 6 Room 7 Room 8 Room 1 Room 2 Room 3 Room 4 Room 1 Room 2 Room 1 Room 2 Room 3 Room 42:00 PM0018 183:00 PM66670000110030110032 1618 344:00 PM66674866001102011055 2818 465:00 PM00674866010144100149 2518 436:00 PM0000000010000201015318 217:00 PM0018 18Notes:[1] The applicant has noted that about 70% of parents drop-off their child and leave. However, conservatively we assumed that only 50% of parents will wait for their children to finish their lessons.Room 1 Room 2 Room 3 Room 4 Room 5 Room 6 Room 7 Room 8 Room 1 Room 2 Room 3 Room 4 Room 1 Room 2 Room 1 Room 2 Room 3 Room 48:00 AM0012 129:00 AM11003011007412 1610:00 AM00113001107412 1611:00 AM11003001107412 1612:00 PM00110201106312 151:00 PM0012 12Notes:[1] The applicant has noted that about 70% of parents drop-off their child and leave during non-summer periors with summer periods being closer to 90%. However, conservatively we assumed that only 50% of parents will wait for their children to finish their lessons.Room 1 Room 2 Room 3 Room 4 Room 5 Room 6 Room 7 Room 8 Room 1 Room 2 Room 3 Room 4 Room 1 Room 2 Room 1 Room 2 Room 3 Room 48:00 AM0018 189:00 AM6667486649 2518 4310:00 AM66674866110030110056 2818 4611:00 AM66674866001102011055 2818 4612:00 PM66674866010144100161 3118 491:00 PM66674866100002010154 2718 452:00 PM6667486649 2518 433:00 PM2222132216 818 264:00 PM2222132216 818 265:00 PM111101117418 226:00 PM0018 18Notes:[1] The applicant has noted that about 90% of parents drop-off their child and leave. However, conservatively we assumed that only 50% of parents will wait for their children to finish their lessons.SUMMER WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]Timeof DayAfterschool (Students) Piano (Students) Art (Students) Academy/Tutoring (Students)Total StudentsStudent Parking Demand [1] Total EmployeesTotal Parking DemandStudent Parking Demand [1] Total EmployeesTotal Parking DemandAppendix A3EPLEX STUDENT AND EMPLOYEE DATAAfterschool (Students) Piano (Students) Art (Students) Academy/Tutoring (Students)Total Students NON SUMMER AND SUMMER SATURDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]Afterschool (Students) Piano (Students) Art (Students) Academy/Tutoring (Students) Total Parking DemandTotal Students Total EmployeesStudent Parking Demand [1]Timeof DayAppendix A2EPLEX STUDENT AND EMPLOYEE DATATimeof DayAppendix AEPLEX STUDENT AND EMPLOYEE DATAWEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]7.1.bPacket Pg. 112
N:\4300\2214394 - Eplex at Diamond Hills Plaza, Diamond Bar\Report\4394 Eplex Tutoring Center Parking Demand Analysis 7-15-21.doc
APPENDIX B
ULI SHARED PARKING CALCULATION WORKSHEETS
7.1.b
Packet Pg. 113
Land UseSizeKSFPkg Rate[2]/KSFMode AdjustNon-Captive RatioGrossSpacesTime% Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec % Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Decof DayPeak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Peak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces6:00 AM 1%000000000000009%11111111111111111111111111117:00 AM 5%2111111111122214%11111111111111322222222223338:00 AM 14%6444444444456523%21122222222222855666666667879:00 AM 32% 13889999999910131141%43333333333344171111121212121212121213171510:00 AM 54% 23 14 14 16 15 17 17 16 17 15 16 17 23 20 68%75565666655677301919222023232223202123302711:00 AM 68% 29 17 18 20 19 21 21 20 21 19 20 22 29 25 86%96677777777899382324272628282728262730383412:00 PM 90% 38 22 23 27 25 27 27 27 28 25 26 29 38 32 90%9667777777789947282934323434343532333747411:00 PM 90% 38 22 23 27 25 27 27 27 28 25 26 29 38 32 90%9667777777789947282934323434343532333747412:00 PM 86% 36 21 22 25 24 26 26 25 26 24 25 27 36 31 90%9667777777789945272832313333323331323545403:00 PM 77% 32 19 20 22 21 23 23 22 23 21 22 24 32 27 90%9667777777789941252629283030293028293241364:00 PM 77% 32 19 20 22 21 23 23 22 23 21 22 24 32 27 90%9667777777789941252629283030293028293241365:00 PM 77% 32 19 20 22 21 23 23 22 23 21 22 24 32 27 90%9667777777789941252629283030293028293241366:00 PM 81% 34 20 21 24 23 24 24 24 25 22 23 26 34 29 90%9667777777789943262731303131313229303443387:00 PM 72% 30 18 18 21 20 22 22 21 22 20 21 23 30 26 90%9667777777789939242428272929282927283139358:00 PM 59% 25 15 15 18 17 18 18 18 18 17 17 19 25 21 81%8666677676678833212124232525242523232633299:00 PM 41% 17 10 10 12 11 12 12 12 12 11 12 13 17 14 54%53444444444455221314161516161616151617221910:00 PM 14%6444444444456536%43333333333344107777777777810911:00 PM 5%2111111111122218%211222222222224223333333344412:00 AM 0%000000000000000%0000000000000000000000000000Notes:Total SpacesShopping Center (Typical Days)Employee Parking Demand1.001.001.001.00Guest Parking Demand[3] Percentage of peak parking demand factors reflect relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.[2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code.[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020.Appendix BSHOPPING CENTER (TYPICAL DAYS)WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]52Guest Spc.4210 Emp. Spc.12.9804Shared Parking Demand7.1.bPacket Pg. 114
Land UseSizeKSFPkg Rate[2]/KSFMode AdjustNon-Captive RatioGrossSpacesTime% Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec % Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Decof DayPeak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Peak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces6:00 AM 1%0000000000000010%11111111111111111111111111117:00 AM 5%2111111111122215%21122222222222422333333334448:00 AM 30% 13889999999910131140%4333333333334417111112121212121212121317159:00 AM 50% 21 12 13 15 14 15 15 15 15 14 14 16 21 18 75%86666776766788291819212022222122202023292610:00 AM 70% 29 17 18 20 19 21 21 20 21 19 20 22 29 25 85%96677777777899382324272628282728262730383411:00 AM 90% 38 22 23 27 25 27 27 27 28 25 26 29 38 32 95% 10778888888891010482930353335353536333438484212:00 PM 95% 40 24 24 28 27 29 29 28 29 26 28 30 40 34 100% 1077888888889101050313136353737363734363950441:00 PM 100% 42 25 26 29 28 30 30 29 31 28 29 32 42 36 100% 1077888888889101052323337363838373936374152462:00 PM 100% 42 25 26 29 28 30 30 29 31 28 29 32 42 36 100% 1077888888889101052323337363838373936374152463:00 PM 95% 40 24 24 28 27 29 29 28 29 26 28 30 40 34 100% 1077888888889101050313136353737363734363950444:00 PM 90% 38 22 23 27 25 27 27 27 28 25 26 29 38 32 100% 1077888888889101048293035333535353633343848425:00 PM 80% 34 20 21 24 23 24 24 24 25 22 23 26 34 29 95% 1077888888889101044272832313232323330313544396:00 PM 75% 32 19 20 22 21 23 23 22 23 21 22 24 32 27 85%9667777777789941252629283030293028293241367:00 PM 70% 29 17 18 20 19 21 21 20 21 19 20 22 29 25 80%8666677676678837232426252828262825262937338:00 PM 65% 27 16 16 19 18 19 19 19 20 18 19 21 27 23 75%8666677676678835222225242626252724252835319:00 PM 50% 21 12 13 15 14 15 15 15 15 14 14 16 21 18 65%75565666655677281718211921212121191922282510:00 PM 30% 13889999999910131145%53444444444455181112131313131313131314181611:00 PM 10%4223333333334315%211222222222226335555555556512:00 AM 0%000000000000000%0000000000000000000000000000Notes:[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020.[2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code.[3] Percentage of peak parking demand factors reflect relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.12.9804521.00Guest Parking Demand1.001.001.00Shared Parking DemandEmployee Parking DemandTotal Spaces42 Guest Spc.10 Emp. Spc.Shopping Center (Typical Days)SHOPPING CENTER (TYPICAL DAYS)Appendix BWEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]7.1.bPacket Pg. 115
Land UseSizeKSFPkg Rate[2]/KSFMode AdjustNon-Captive RatioGrossSpacesTime% Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec % Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Decof DayPeak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Peak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces6:00 AM 5%8778788887888820%6666666666666614131314131414141413141414147:00 AM 20% 30 28 26 28 28 29 28 29 29 28 29 29 30 29 30%8888888888888838363436363736373736373738378:00 AM 30% 46 43 40 43 42 45 43 44 44 42 44 44 46 44 40% 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 57 54 51 54 53 56 54 55 55 53 55 55 57 559:00 AM 50% 76 71 65 71 70 74 71 73 72 70 72 72 76 72 80% 22 22 21 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 98 93 86 93 92 96 93 95 94 92 94 94 98 9410:00 AM 60% 91 85 78 86 84 88 86 87 86 84 86 86 91 86 90% 25 25 24 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 116 110 102 111 109 113 111 112 111 109 111 111 116 11111:00 AM 67% 102 95 88 96 94 99 96 98 97 94 97 97 102 97 100% 28 28 27 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 130 123 115 124 122 127 124 126 125 122 125 125 130 12512:00 PM 85% 129 120 111 121 119 125 121 124 123 119 123 123 129 123 100% 28 28 27 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 157 148 138 149 147 153 149 152 151 147 151 151 157 1511:00 PM 90% 137 127 118 129 126 133 129 132 130 126 130 130 137 130 100% 28 28 27 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 165 155 145 157 154 161 157 160 158 154 158 158 165 1582:00 PM 95% 144 134 124 135 132 140 135 138 137 132 137 137 144 137 100% 28 28 27 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 172 162 151 163 160 168 163 166 165 160 165 165 172 1653:00 PM 97% 147 137 126 138 135 143 138 141 140 135 140 140 147 140 100% 28 28 27 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 175 165 153 166 163 171 166 169 168 163 168 168 175 1684:00 PM 100% 152 141 131 143 140 147 143 146 144 140 144 144 152 144 100% 28 28 27 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 180 169 158 171 168 175 171 174 172 168 172 172 180 1725:00 PM 100% 152 141 131 143 140 147 143 146 144 140 144 144 152 144 100% 28 28 27 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 180 169 158 171 168 175 171 174 172 168 172 172 180 1726:00 PM 100% 152 141 131 143 140 147 143 146 144 140 144 144 152 144 80% 22 22 21 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 174 163 152 165 162 169 165 168 166 162 166 166 174 1667:00 PM 85% 129 120 111 121 119 125 121 124 123 119 123 123 129 123 50% 14 14 13 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 143 134 124 135 133 139 135 138 137 133 137 137 143 1378:00 PM 55% 84 78 72 79 77 81 79 81 80 77 80 80 84 80 35% 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 94 88 82 89 87 91 89 91 90 87 90 90 94 909:00 PM 35% 53 49 46 50 49 51 50 51 50 49 50 50 53 50 20%66666666666666595552565557565756555656595610:00 PM 20% 30 28 26 28 28 29 28 29 29 28 29 29 30 29 20%66666666666666363432343435343535343535363511:00 PM 5%8778788887888820%66666666666666141313141314141414131414141412:00 AM 5%8778788887888820%666666666666661413131413141414141314141414Notes:1.00152 Guest Spc.28 Emp. Spc.180[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020.[2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code.[3] Percentage of peak parking demand factors reflect relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.Appendix BSupermarket/GrocerySUPERMARKET/GROCERYWEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]1.001.001.00Guest Parking DemandTotal Spaces45.0004Shared Parking DemandEmployee Parking Demand7.1.bPacket Pg. 116
Land UseSizeKSFPkg Rate[2]/KSFMode AdjustNon-Captive RatioGrossSpacesTime% Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec % Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Decof DayPeak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Peak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces6:00 AM 10% 15 14 13 14 14 15 14 14 14 14 14 14 15 14 15%4444444444444419181718181918181818181819187:00 AM 25% 38 35 33 36 35 37 36 36 36 35 36 36 38 36 35% 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 48 45 43 46 45 47 46 46 46 45 46 46 48 468:00 AM 50% 76 71 65 71 70 74 71 73 72 70 72 72 76 72 70% 20 20 19 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 96 91 84 91 90 94 91 93 92 90 92 92 96 929:00 AM 75% 114 106 98 107 105 111 107 109 108 105 108 108 114 108 85% 24 24 23 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 138 130 121 131 129 135 131 133 132 129 132 132 138 13210:00 AM 95% 144 134 124 135 132 140 135 138 137 132 137 137 144 137 100% 28 28 27 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 172 162 151 163 160 168 163 166 165 160 165 165 172 16511:00 AM 100% 152 141 131 143 140 147 143 146 144 140 144 144 152 144 100% 28 28 27 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 180 169 158 171 168 175 171 174 172 168 172 172 180 17212:00 PM 100% 152 141 131 143 140 147 143 146 144 140 144 144 152 144 100% 28 28 27 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 180 169 158 171 168 175 171 174 172 168 172 172 180 1721:00 PM 100% 152 141 131 143 140 147 143 146 144 140 144 144 152 144 100% 28 28 27 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 180 169 158 171 168 175 171 174 172 168 172 172 180 1722:00 PM 100% 152 141 131 143 140 147 143 146 144 140 144 144 152 144 85% 24 24 23 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 176 165 154 167 164 171 167 170 168 164 168 168 176 1683:00 PM 100% 152 141 131 143 140 147 143 146 144 140 144 144 152 144 75% 21 21 20 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 173 162 151 164 161 168 164 167 165 161 165 165 173 1654:00 PM 100% 152 141 131 143 140 147 143 146 144 140 144 144 152 144 60% 17 17 16 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 169 158 147 160 157 164 160 163 161 157 161 161 169 1615:00 PM 90% 137 127 118 129 126 133 129 132 130 126 130 130 137 130 55% 15 15 14 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 152 142 132 144 141 148 144 147 145 141 145 145 152 1456:00 PM 50% 76 71 65 71 70 74 71 73 72 70 72 72 76 72 45% 13 13 12 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 89 84 77 84 83 87 84 86 85 83 85 85 89 857:00 PM 33% 50 47 43 47 46 49 47 48 48 46 48 48 50 48 40% 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 61 58 54 58 57 60 58 59 59 57 59 59 61 598:00 PM 25% 38 35 33 36 35 37 36 36 36 35 36 36 38 36 30%8888888888888846434144434544444443444446449:00 PM 15% 23 21 20 22 21 22 22 22 22 21 22 22 23 22 20%66666666666666292726282728282828272828292810:00 PM 5%8778788887888810%33333333333333111010111011111111101111111111:00 PM 4%6656666666666610%333333333333339989999999999912:00 AM 3%554555555555555%1111111111111166566666666666Notes:Shared Parking DemandEmployee Parking DemandGuest Parking DemandWEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]1.001.001.001.0045.0004180[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020.[2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code.[3] Percentage of peak parking demand factors reflect relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.Total Spaces152 Guest Spc.28 Emp. Spc.Supermarket/GrocerySUPERMARKET/GROCERYAppendix B7.1.bPacket Pg. 117
Land UseSizeKSFPkg Rate[2]/KSFMode AdjustNon-Captive RatioGrossSpacesTime% Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec % Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Decof DayPeak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Peak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces6:00 AM 5%0000000000000020%00000000000000000000000000007:00 AM 20%1111111111111130%00000000000000111111111111118:00 AM 30%1111111111111140%00000000000000111111111111119:00 AM 60%2222222222222280%000000000000002222222222222210:00 AM 60%2222222222222290%000000000000002222222222222211:00 AM 67%33333333333333100%000000000000003333333333333312:00 PM 85%33333333333333100%00000000000000333333333333331:00 PM 90%44344444444444100%00000000000000443444444444442:00 PM 95%44344444444444100%00000000000000443444444444443:00 PM 97%44344444444444100%00000000000000443444444444444:00 PM 100%44344444444444100%00000000000000443444444444445:00 PM 100%44344444444444100%00000000000000443444444444446:00 PM 100%4434444444444480%00000000000000443444444444447:00 PM 85%3333333333333350%00000000000000333333333333338:00 PM 55%2222222222222235%00000000000000222222222222229:00 PM 35%1111111111111120%000000000000001111111111111110:00 PM 20%1111111111111120%000000000000001111111111111111:00 PM 5%0000000000000020%000000000000000000000000000012:00 AM 5%0000000000000020%0000000000000000000000000000Notes:1.004 Guest Spc.0 Emp. Spc.4[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020.[2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code.[3] Percentage of peak parking demand factors reflect relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.Appendix BPharmacyPHARMACYWEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]1.001.001.00Guest Parking DemandTotal Spaces1.1074Shared Parking DemandEmployee Parking Demand7.1.bPacket Pg. 118
Land UseSizeKSFPkg Rate[2]/KSFMode AdjustNon-Captive RatioGrossSpacesTime% Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec % Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Decof DayPeak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Peak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces6:00 AM 8%0000000000000015%00000000000000000000000000007:00 AM 25%1111111111111135%00000000000000111111111111118:00 AM 50%2222222222222270%00000000000000222222222222229:00 AM 75%3333333333333385%000000000000003333333333333310:00 AM 95%44344444444444100%000000000000004434444444444411:00 AM 100%44344444444444100%000000000000004434444444444412:00 PM 100%44344444444444100%00000000000000443444444444441:00 PM 100%44344444444444100%00000000000000443444444444442:00 PM 100%4434444444444485%00000000000000443444444444443:00 PM 100%4434444444444475%00000000000000443444444444444:00 PM 100%4434444444444460%00000000000000443444444444445:00 PM 90%4434444444444455%00000000000000443444444444446:00 PM 50%2222222222222245%00000000000000222222222222227:00 PM 33%1111111111111140%00000000000000111111111111118:00 PM 25%1111111111111130%00000000000000111111111111119:00 PM 15%1111111111111120%000000000000001111111111111110:00 PM 5%0000000000000010%000000000000000000000000000011:00 PM 4%0000000000000010%000000000000000000000000000012:00 AM 3%000000000000005%0000000000000000000000000000Notes:Shared Parking DemandEmployee Parking DemandGuest Parking DemandWEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]1.001.001.001.001.10744[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020.[2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code.[3] Percentage of peak parking demand factors reflect relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.Total Spaces4 Guest Spc.0 Emp. Spc.PharmacyPHARMACYAppendix B7.1.bPacket Pg. 119
Land UseSizeKSFPkg Rate[2]/KSFMode AdjustNon-Captive RatioGrossSpacesTime% Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec % Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Decof DayPeak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Peak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces6:00 AM 25% 59 52 51 58 55 58 55 57 57 53 55 53 59 56 50% 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 76 69 68 75 72 75 72 74 74 70 72 70 76 737:00 AM 50% 118 104 103 116 111 117 111 113 113 105 110 105 118 112 75% 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 143 129 128 141 136 142 136 138 138 130 135 130 143 1378:00 AM 60% 142 125 124 139 133 141 133 136 136 126 132 126 142 135 90% 30 30 29 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 172 155 153 169 163 171 163 166 166 156 162 156 172 1659:00 AM 75% 177 156 154 173 166 175 166 170 170 158 165 158 177 168 90% 30 30 29 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 207 186 183 203 196 205 196 200 200 188 195 188 207 19810:00 AM 85% 201 177 175 197 189 199 189 193 193 179 187 179 201 191 100% 33 33 32 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 234 210 207 230 222 232 222 226 226 212 220 212 234 22411:00 AM 90% 212 187 184 208 199 210 199 204 204 189 197 189 212 201 100% 33 33 32 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 245 220 216 241 232 243 232 237 237 222 230 222 245 23412:00 PM 100% 236 208 205 231 222 234 222 227 227 210 219 210 236 224 100% 33 33 32 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 269 241 237 264 255 267 255 260 260 243 252 243 269 2571:00 PM 90% 212 187 184 208 199 210 199 204 204 189 197 189 212 201 100% 33 33 32 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 245 220 216 241 232 243 232 237 237 222 230 222 245 2342:00 PM 50% 118 104 103 116 111 117 111 113 113 105 110 105 118 112 100% 33 33 32 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 151 137 135 149 144 150 144 146 146 138 143 138 151 1453:00 PM 45% 106 93 92 104 100 105 100 102 102 94 99 94 106 101 75% 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 131 118 117 129 125 130 125 127 127 119 124 119 131 1264:00 PM 45% 106 93 92 104 100 105 100 102 102 94 99 94 106 101 75% 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 131 118 117 129 125 130 125 127 127 119 124 119 131 1265:00 PM 75% 177 156 154 173 166 175 166 170 170 158 165 158 177 168 95% 31 31 30 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 208 187 184 204 197 206 197 201 201 189 196 189 208 1996:00 PM 80% 189 166 164 185 178 187 178 181 181 168 176 168 189 180 95% 31 31 30 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 220 197 194 216 209 218 209 212 212 199 207 199 220 2117:00 PM 80% 189 166 164 185 178 187 178 181 181 168 176 168 189 180 95% 31 31 30 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 220 197 194 216 209 218 209 212 212 199 207 199 220 2118:00 PM 80% 189 166 164 185 178 187 178 181 181 168 176 168 189 180 95% 31 31 30 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 220 197 194 216 209 218 209 212 212 199 207 199 220 2119:00 PM 60% 142 125 124 139 133 141 133 136 136 126 132 126 142 135 80% 26 26 25 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 168 151 149 165 159 167 159 162 162 152 158 152 168 16110:00 PM 55% 130 114 113 127 122 129 122 125 125 116 121 116 130 124 65% 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 151 135 134 148 143 150 143 146 146 137 142 137 151 14511:00 PM 75% 177 156 154 173 166 175 166 170 170 158 165 158 177 168 65% 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 198 177 175 194 187 196 187 191 191 179 186 179 198 18912:00 AM 25% 59 52 51 58 55 58 55 57 57 53 55 53 59 56 35% 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 71 64 63 70 67 70 67 69 69 65 67 65 71 68Notes:[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020.Appendix BFamily RestaurantFAMILY RESTAURANTWEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]Guest Parking Demand20.449--Total Spaces1.001.001.001.0033Shared Parking DemandEmployee Parking Demand[3] Percentage of peak parking demand factors reflect relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.[2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code.Emp. Spc.269236 Guest Spc.7.1.bPacket Pg. 120
Land UseSizeKSFPkg Rate[2]/KSFMode AdjustNon-Captive RatioGrossSpacesTime% Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec % Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Decof DayPeak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Peak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces6:00 AM 10% 24 21 21 24 23 24 23 23 23 21 22 21 24 23 49% 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 40 37 37 40 39 40 39 39 39 37 38 37 40 397:00 AM 25% 59 52 51 58 55 58 55 57 57 53 55 53 59 56 74% 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 83 76 75 82 79 82 79 81 81 77 79 77 83 808:00 AM 44% 104 92 90 102 98 103 98 100 100 93 97 93 104 99 88% 29 29 28 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 133 121 118 131 127 132 127 129 129 122 126 122 133 1289:00 AM 69% 163 143 142 160 153 161 153 156 156 145 152 145 163 155 88% 29 29 28 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 192 172 170 189 182 190 182 185 185 174 181 174 192 18410:00 AM 88% 208 183 181 204 196 206 196 200 200 185 193 185 208 198 98% 32 32 31 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 240 215 212 236 228 238 228 232 232 217 225 217 240 23011:00 AM 88% 208 183 181 204 196 206 196 200 200 185 193 185 208 198 98% 32 32 31 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 240 215 212 236 228 238 228 232 232 217 225 217 240 23012:00 PM 98% 231 203 201 226 217 229 217 222 222 206 215 206 231 219 98% 32 32 31 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 263 235 232 258 249 261 249 254 254 238 247 238 263 2511:00 PM 84% 198 174 172 194 186 196 186 190 190 176 184 176 198 188 98% 32 32 31 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 230 206 203 226 218 228 218 222 222 208 216 208 230 2202:00 PM 64% 151 133 131 148 142 149 142 145 145 134 140 134 151 143 98% 32 32 31 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 183 165 162 180 174 181 174 177 177 166 172 166 183 1753:00 PM 39% 92 81 80 90 86 91 86 88 88 82 86 82 92 87 74% 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 116 105 104 114 110 115 110 112 112 106 110 106 116 1114:00 PM 44% 104 92 90 102 98 103 98 100 100 93 97 93 104 99 74% 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 128 116 114 126 122 127 122 124 124 117 121 117 128 1235:00 PM 59% 139 122 121 136 131 138 131 133 133 124 129 124 139 132 93% 31 31 30 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 170 153 151 167 162 169 162 164 164 155 160 155 170 1636:00 PM 69% 163 143 142 160 153 161 153 156 156 145 152 145 163 155 93% 31 31 30 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 194 174 172 191 184 192 184 187 187 176 183 176 194 1867:00 PM 69% 163 143 142 160 153 161 153 156 156 145 152 145 163 155 93% 31 31 30 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 194 174 172 191 184 192 184 187 187 176 183 176 194 1868:00 PM 64% 151 133 131 148 142 149 142 145 145 134 140 134 151 143 93% 31 31 30 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 182 164 161 179 173 180 173 176 176 165 171 165 182 1749:00 PM 29% 68 60 59 67 64 67 64 65 65 61 63 61 68 65 79% 26 26 25 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 94 86 84 93 90 93 90 91 91 87 89 87 94 9110:00 PM 25% 59 52 51 58 55 58 55 57 57 53 55 53 59 56 64% 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 80 73 72 79 76 79 76 78 78 74 76 74 80 7711:00 PM 15% 35 31 30 34 33 35 33 34 34 31 33 31 35 33 64% 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 56 52 51 55 54 56 54 55 55 52 54 52 56 5412:00 AM 10% 24 21 21 24 23 24 23 23 23 21 22 21 24 23 34% 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 35 32 32 35 34 35 34 34 34 32 33 32 35 34Notes:Guest Spc.1.00Appendix BWEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]Family RestaurantTotal Spaces[3] Percentage of peak parking demand factors reflect relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020.[2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code.26933 Emp. Spc.1.001.0020.449--Guest Parking Demand1.00236Shared Parking DemandEmployee Parking DemandFAMILY RESTAURANT7.1.bPacket Pg. 121
Land UseSizeKSFPkg Rate[2]/KSFMode AdjustNon-Captive RatioGrossSpacesTime% Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec % Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Decof DayPeak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Peak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces6:00 AM 5%1111111111111120%00000000000000111111111111117:00 AM 10%2222222222222220%00000000000000222222222222228:00 AM 20%3333333333333329%11111111111111444444444444449:00 AM 29%5445555555555539%111111111111116556666666666610:00 AM 54%9889999998989973%1111111111111110991010101010109109101011:00 AM 83% 13 11 11 13 12 13 13 13 13 12 12 12 12 12 98%22222222222222151313151415151515141414141412:00 PM 98% 16 14 14 16 15 16 16 16 16 15 15 15 15 15 98%2222222222222218161618171818181817171717171:00 PM 98% 16 14 14 16 15 16 16 16 16 15 15 15 15 15 98%2222222222222218161618171818181817171717172:00 PM 88% 14 12 12 14 13 14 14 14 14 13 13 13 13 13 93%2222222222222216141416151616161615151515153:00 PM 59%9889999998989969%111111111111111099101010101010910910104:00 PM 54%9889999998989959%111111111111111099101010101010910910105:00 PM 59%9889999998989969%111111111111111099101010101010910910106:00 PM 83% 13 11 11 13 12 13 13 13 13 12 12 12 12 12 88%2222222222222215131315141515151514141414147:00 PM 78% 12 10 10 12 11 12 12 12 12 11 12 11 12 11 88%2222222222222214121214131414141413141314138:00 PM 49%8778888887878859%11111111111111988999999898999:00 PM 29%5445555555555539%111111111111116556666666666610:00 PM 20%3333333333333329%111111111111114444444444444411:00 PM 10%2222222222222220%000000000000002222222222222212:00 AM 5%1111111111111120%0000000000000011111111111111Notes:[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020.FAST-FOOD RESTAURANTWEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]Appendix B101.754Shared Parking DemandEmployee Parking DemandGuest Parking Demand[3] Percentage of peak parking demand factors reflect relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.[2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code.1.001.001.001.00Total SpacesFast-Food Restaurant1816 Guest Spc.2 Emp. Spc.7.1.bPacket Pg. 122
Land UseSizeKSFPkg Rate[2]/KSFMode AdjustNon-Captive RatioGrossSpacesTime% Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec % Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Decof DayPeak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Peak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces6:00 AM 5%1111111111111115%00000000000000111111111111117:00 AM 10%2222222222222220%00000000000000222222222222228:00 AM 20%3333333333333330%11111111111111444444444444449:00 AM 30%5445555555555540%111111111111116556666666666610:00 AM 55%9889999998989975%22222222222222111010111111111111101110111111:00 AM 85% 14 12 12 14 13 14 14 14 14 13 13 13 13 13 100%22222222222222161414161516161616151515151512:00 PM 100% 16 14 14 16 15 16 16 16 16 15 15 15 15 15 100%2222222222222218161618171818181817171717171:00 PM 100% 16 14 14 16 15 16 16 16 16 15 15 15 15 15 100%2222222222222218161618171818181817171717172:00 PM 90% 14 12 12 14 13 14 14 14 14 13 13 13 13 13 95%2222222222222216141416151616161615151515153:00 PM 60% 10 9 9 10 10 10 10 10 10 9 10 9 10 10 70%1111111111111111101011111111111110111011114:00 PM 55%9889999998989960%111111111111111099101010101010910910105:00 PM 60% 10 9 9 10 10 10 10 10 10 9 10 9 10 10 70%1111111111111111101011111111111110111011116:00 PM 85% 14 12 12 14 13 14 14 14 14 13 13 13 13 13 90%2222222222222216141416151616161615151515157:00 PM 80% 13 11 11 13 12 13 13 13 13 12 12 12 12 12 90%2222222222222215131315141515151514141414148:00 PM 50%8778888887878860%11111111111111988999999898999:00 PM 30%5445555555555540%111111111111116556666666666610:00 PM 20%3333333333333330%111111111111114444444444444411:00 PM 10%2222222222222220%000000000000002222222222222212:00 AM 5%1111111111111120%0000000000000011111111111111Notes:[3] Percentage of peak parking demand factors reflect relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020.[2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code.16 Guest Spc.Employee Parking DemandShared Parking Demand2 Emp. Spc.1.001.00Total Spaces18Guest Parking Demand1.001.00FAST-FOOD RESTAURANTAppendix BWEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]Fast-Food Restaurant1.754107.1.bPacket Pg. 123
Land UseSizeKSFPkg Rate[2]/KSFMode AdjustNon-Captive RatioGrossSpacesTime% Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec % Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Decof DayPeak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Peak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces6:00 AM 0%000000000000003%44444444444443444444444444437:00 AM 1%0000000000000015%202020202020201919202020201620202020202020191920202020168:00 AM 20%2222222222222250%686868686868686565686868685470707070707070676770707070569:00 AM 60%7777777777777690%1221221221221221221221161161221221221229812912912912912912912912312312912912912910410:00 AM 100% 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 10 100% 136 136 136 136 136 136 136 129 129 136 136 136 136 109 148 148 148 148 148 148 148 140 140 148 148 148 148 11911:00 AM 45%55555555555554100% 136 136 136 136 136 136 136 129 129 136 136 136 136 109 141 141 141 141 141 141 141 134 134 141 141 141 141 11312:00 PM 15%2222222222222285%11611611611611611611611011011611611611693118118118118118118118112112118118118118951:00 PM 45%5555555555555485%11611611611611611611611011011611611611693121121121121121121121115115121121121121972:00 PM 95% 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 10 10 11 11 11 11 9 95% 129 129 129 129 129 129 129 123 123 129 129 129 129 103 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 133 133 140 140 140 140 1123:00 PM 45%5555555555555495%1291291291291291291291231231291291291291031341341341341341341341281281341341341341074:00 PM 15%2222222222222285%11611611611611611611611011011611611611693118118118118118118118112112118118118118955:00 PM 10%1111111111111160%828282828282827878828282826683838383838383797983838383676:00 PM 5%1111111111111125%343434343434343232343434342735353535353535333335353535287:00 PM 2%0000000000000015%202020202020201919202020201620202020202020191920202020168:00 PM 1%000000000000005%77777777777776777777777777769:00 PM 0%000000000000003%444444444444434444444444444310:00 PM 0%000000000000001%111111111111111111111111111111:00 PM 0%000000000000000%000000000000000000000000000012:00 AM 0%000000000000000%0000000000000000000000000000Notes:[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020.Appendix BOfficeOFFICEWEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]Guest Parking Demand59.1653Total Spaces1.001.001.001.00136Shared Parking DemandEmployee Parking Demand[3] Percentage of peak parking demand factors reflect relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.[2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code.Emp. Spc.14812 Guest Spc.7.1.bPacket Pg. 124
Land UseSizeKSFPkg Rate[2]/KSFMode AdjustNon-Captive RatioGrossSpacesTime% Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec % Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Decof DayPeak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Peak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces6:00 AM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000007:00 AM 2%000000000000002%33333333333332333333333333328:00 AM 6%111111111111116%88888888888886999999999999979:00 AM 8%111111111111118%111111111111111010111111119121212121212121111121212121010:00 AM 9%111111111111119%1212121212121211111212121210131313131313131212131313131111:00 AM 10%1111111111111110%1414141414141413131414141411151515151515151414151515151212:00 PM 9%111111111111119%121212121212121111121212121013131313131313121213131313111:00 PM 8%111111111111118%11111111111111101011111111912121212121212111112121212102:00 PM 6%111111111111116%88888888888886999999999999973:00 PM 4%000000000000004%55555555555554555555555555544:00 PM 2%000000000000002%33333333333332333333333333325:00 PM 1%000000000000001%11111111111111111111111111116:00 PM 1%000000000000001%11111111111111111111111111117:00 PM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000008:00 PM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000009:00 PM 0%000000000000000%000000000000000000000000000010:00 PM 0%000000000000000%000000000000000000000000000011:00 PM 0%000000000000000%000000000000000000000000000012:00 AM 0%000000000000000%0000000000000000000000000000Notes:Guest Spc.1.00Appendix BWEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]OfficeTotal Spaces[3] Percentage of peak parking demand factors reflect relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020.[2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code.148136 Emp. Spc.1.001.0059.1653Guest Parking Demand1.0012Shared Parking DemandEmployee Parking DemandOFFICE7.1.bPacket Pg. 125
Land UseSizeKSFPkg Rate[2]/KSFMode AdjustNon-Captive RatioGrossSpacesTime% Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec % Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Decof DayPeak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Peak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces6:00 AM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000007:00 AM 0%0000000000000020%22222222222222222222222222228:00 AM 90% 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 15 15 16 16 16 16 13 100%9999999999999725252525252525242425252525209:00 AM 90% 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 15 15 16 16 16 16 13 100%99999999999997252525252525252424252525252010:00 AM 100% 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 17 17 18 18 18 18 14 100%99999999999997272727272727272626272727272111:00 AM 100% 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 17 17 18 18 18 18 14 100%99999999999997272727272727272626272727272112:00 PM 30%55555555555554100%9999999999999714141414141414141414141414111:00 PM 90% 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 15 15 16 16 16 16 13 100%9999999999999725252525252525242425252525202:00 PM 100% 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 17 17 18 18 18 18 14 100%9999999999999727272727272727262627272727213:00 PM 100% 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 17 17 18 18 18 18 14 100%9999999999999727272727272727262627272727214:00 PM 90% 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 15 15 16 16 16 16 13 100%9999999999999725252525252525242425252525205:00 PM 80% 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 13 13 14 14 14 14 11 100%9999999999999723232323232323222223232323186:00 PM 67% 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 10 67%6666666666666518181818181818171718181818157:00 PM 30%5555555555555430%33333333333332888888888888868:00 PM 15%3333333333333215%11111111111111444444444444439:00 PM 0%000000000000000%000000000000000000000000000010:00 PM 0%000000000000000%000000000000000000000000000011:00 PM 0%000000000000000%000000000000000000000000000012:00 AM 0%000000000000000%0000000000000000000000000000Notes:[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020.Appendix BMedical/Dental OfficeMEDICAL/DENTAL OFFICEWEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]Guest Parking Demand6.8414Total Spaces1.001.001.001.009Shared Parking DemandEmployee Parking Demand[3] Percentage of peak parking demand factors reflect relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.[2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code.Emp. Spc.2718 Guest Spc.7.1.bPacket Pg. 126
Land UseSizeKSFPkg Rate[2]/KSFMode AdjustNon-Captive RatioGrossSpacesTime% Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec % Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Decof DayPeak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Peak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces6:00 AM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000007:00 AM 0%0000000000000020%22222222222222222222222222228:00 AM 90% 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 15 15 16 16 16 16 13 100%9999999999999725252525252525242425252525209:00 AM 90% 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 15 15 16 16 16 16 13 100%99999999999997252525252525252424252525252010:00 AM 100% 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 17 17 18 18 18 18 14 100%99999999999997272727272727272626272727272111:00 AM 100% 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 17 17 18 18 18 18 14 100%99999999999997272727272727272626272727272112:00 PM 30%55555555555554100%9999999999999714141414141414141414141414111:00 PM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000002:00 PM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000003:00 PM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000004:00 PM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000005:00 PM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000006:00 PM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000007:00 PM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000008:00 PM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000009:00 PM 0%000000000000000%000000000000000000000000000010:00 PM 0%000000000000000%000000000000000000000000000011:00 PM 0%000000000000000%000000000000000000000000000012:00 AM 0%000000000000000%0000000000000000000000000000Notes:Guest Spc.1.00Appendix BWEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]Medical/Dental OfficeTotal Spaces[3] Percentage of peak parking demand factors reflect relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020.[2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code.279 Emp. Spc.1.001.006.8414Guest Parking Demand1.0018Shared Parking DemandEmployee Parking DemandMEDICAL/DENTAL OFFICE7.1.bPacket Pg. 127
Land UseSizeKSFPkg Rate[2]/KSFMode AdjustNon-Captive RatioGrossSpacesTime% Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec % Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Decof DayPeak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Peak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces6:00 AM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000007:00 AM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000008:00 AM 50% 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 60%9999999999999919191919191919191919191919199:00 AM 90% 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 100% 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 3310:00 AM 100% 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 100% 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 3511:00 AM 50% 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 100% 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 2512:00 PM 50% 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 100% 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 251:00 PM 50% 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 100% 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 252:00 PM 70% 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 100% 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 293:00 PM 50% 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 100% 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 254:00 PM 80% 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 100% 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 315:00 PM 100% 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 100% 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 356:00 PM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000007:00 PM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000008:00 PM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000009:00 PM 0%000000000000000%000000000000000000000000000010:00 PM 0%000000000000000%000000000000000000000000000011:00 PM 0%000000000000000%000000000000000000000000000012:00 AM 0%000000000000000%0000000000000000000000000000Notes:[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020.Appendix BBankBANKWEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]Guest Parking Demand10.6473Total Spaces1.001.001.001.0015Shared Parking DemandEmployee Parking Demand[3] Percentage of peak parking demand factors reflect relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.[2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code.Emp. Spc.3520 Guest Spc.7.1.bPacket Pg. 128
Land UseSizeKSFPkg Rate[2]/KSFMode AdjustNon-Captive RatioGrossSpacesTime% Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec % Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Decof DayPeak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Peak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces6:00 AM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000007:00 AM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000008:00 AM 20%4444444444444471%9999999999999913131313131313131313131313139:00 AM 32%7777777777777779%1010101010101010101010101010171717171717171717171717171710:00 AM 59% 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 79% 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 2311:00 AM 79% 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 79% 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 2712:00 PM 71% 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 79% 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 261:00 PM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000002:00 PM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000003:00 PM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000004:00 PM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000005:00 PM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000006:00 PM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000007:00 PM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000008:00 PM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000009:00 PM 0%000000000000000%000000000000000000000000000010:00 PM 0%000000000000000%000000000000000000000000000011:00 PM 0%000000000000000%000000000000000000000000000012:00 AM 0%000000000000000%0000000000000000000000000000Notes:Guest Spc.1.00Appendix BWEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]BankTotal Spaces[3] Percentage of peak parking demand factors reflect relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020.[2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code.3513 Emp. Spc.1.001.0010.6473Guest Parking Demand1.0022Shared Parking DemandEmployee Parking DemandBANK7.1.bPacket Pg. 129
Land UseSizeKSFPkg Rate[2]/KSFMode AdjustNon-Captive RatioGrossSpacesTime% Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec % Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Decof DayPeak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Peak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces6:00 AM 1%000000000000009%00000000000000000000000000007:00 AM 5%0000000000000014%00000000000000000000000000008:00 AM 14%1111111111111123%00000000000000111111111111119:00 AM 32%2111111111122241%111111111111113222222222233310:00 AM 54%3222222222223368%111111111111114333333333334411:00 AM 68%4223333333334386%211222222222226335555555556512:00 PM 90%5334344443345490%21122222222222744656666556761:00 PM 90%5334344443345490%21122222222222744656666556762:00 PM 86%5334344443345490%21122222222222744656666556763:00 PM 77%5334344443345490%21122222222222744656666556764:00 PM 77%5334344443345490%21122222222222744656666556765:00 PM 77%5334344443345490%21122222222222744656666556766:00 PM 81%5334344443345490%21122222222222744656666556767:00 PM 72%4223333333334390%21122222222222633555555555658:00 PM 59%4223333333334381%21122222222222633555555555659:00 PM 41%2111111111122254%111111111111113222222222233310:00 PM 14%1111111111111136%111111111111112222222222222211:00 PM 5%0000000000000018%000000000000000000000000000012:00 AM 0%000000000000000%0000000000000000000000000000Notes:6 Guest Spc.2 Emp. Spc.8 Total Spaces[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020.[2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code.[3] Percentage of peak parking demand factors reflect relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.1.001.00Appendix BSHOPPING CENTER (TYPICAL DAYS)WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]Shopping Center (Typical Days)2.1144Guest Parking DemandEmployee Parking DemandShared Parking Demand1.001.007.1.bPacket Pg. 130
Land UseSizeKSFPkg Rate[2]/KSFMode AdjustNon-Captive RatioGrossSpacesTime% Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec % Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Decof DayPeak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Peak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces6:00 AM 1%0000000000000010%00000000000000000000000000007:00 AM 5%0000000000000015%00000000000000000000000000008:00 AM 30%2111111111122240%11111111111111322222222223339:00 AM 50%3222222222223375%211222222222225334444444445510:00 AM 70%4223333333334385%211222222222226335555555556511:00 AM 90%5334344443345495%211222222222227446566665567612:00 PM 95%64444444444565100%21122222222222855666666667871:00 PM 100%64444444444565100%21122222222222855666666667872:00 PM 100%64444444444565100%21122222222222855666666667873:00 PM 95%64444444444565100%21122222222222855666666667874:00 PM 90%53343444433454100%21122222222222744656666556765:00 PM 80%5334344443345495%21122222222222744656666556766:00 PM 75%5334344443345485%21122222222222744656666556767:00 PM 70%4223333333334380%21122222222222633555555555658:00 PM 65%4223333333334375%21122222222222633555555555659:00 PM 50%3222222222223365%111111111111114333333333334410:00 PM 30%2111111111122245%111111111111113222222222233311:00 PM 10%1111111111111115%000000000000001111111111111112:00 AM 0%000000000000000%0000000000000000000000000000Notes:8 Total Spaces[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020.[2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code.[3] Percentage of peak parking demand factors reflect relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.1.001.001.001.006 Guest Spc.2 Emp. Spc.WEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]Shopping Center (Typical Days)2.1144Guest Parking DemandEmployee Parking DemandShared Parking DemandSHOPPING CENTER (TYPICAL DAYS)Appendix B7.1.bPacket Pg. 131
Land UseSizeKSFPkg Rate[2]/KSFMode AdjustNon-Captive RatioGrossSpacesTime% Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec % Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Decof DayPeak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Peak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces6:00 AM 1%000000000000009%00000000000000000000000000007:00 AM 5%1111111111111114%00000000000000111111111111118:00 AM 14%1111111111111123%11111111111111222222222222229:00 AM 32%3222222222223341%111111111111114333333333334410:00 AM 54%5334344443345468%211222222222227446566665567611:00 AM 68%7445555555557686%32222222222333106677777777810912:00 PM 90%9556666676679890%322222222223331277888889881012111:00 PM 90%9556666676679890%322222222223331277888889881012112:00 PM 86%9556666676679890%322222222223331277888889881012113:00 PM 77%8556566665668790%32222222222333117787888878911104:00 PM 77%8556566665668790%32222222222333117787888878911105:00 PM 77%8556566665668790%32222222222333117787888878911106:00 PM 81%8556566665668790%32222222222333117787888878911107:00 PM 72%7445555555557690%3222222222233310667777777781098:00 PM 59%6444444444456581%21122222222222855666666667879:00 PM 41%4223333333334354%211222222222226335555555556510:00 PM 14%1111111111111136%111111111111112222222222222211:00 PM 5%1111111111111118%111111111111112222222222222212:00 AM 0%000000000000000%0000000000000000000000000000Notes:10 Guest Spc.3 Emp. Spc.13 Total Spaces[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020.[2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code.[3] Percentage of peak parking demand factors reflect relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.1.001.00Appendix BSHOPPING CENTER (TYPICAL DAYS)WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]Shopping Center (Typical Days)2.222--Guest Parking DemandEmployee Parking DemandShared Parking Demand1.001.007.1.bPacket Pg. 132
Land UseSizeKSFPkg Rate[2]/KSFMode AdjustNon-Captive RatioGrossSpacesTime% Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec % Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Decof DayPeak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Peak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces6:00 AM 1%0000000000000010%00000000000000000000000000007:00 AM 5%1111111111111115%00000000000000111111111111118:00 AM 30%3222222222223340%11111111111111433333333333449:00 AM 50%5334344443345475%211222222222227446566665567610:00 AM 70%7445555555557685%32222222222333106677777777810911:00 AM 90%9556666676679895%3222222222233312778888898810121112:00 PM 95% 1066777777778109100%322222222223331388999999991113121:00 PM 100% 1066777777778109100%322222222223331388999999991113122:00 PM 100% 1066777777778109100%322222222223331388999999991113123:00 PM 95% 1066777777778109100%322222222223331388999999991113124:00 PM 90%95566666766798100%322222222223331277888889881012115:00 PM 80%8556566665668795%32222222222333117787888878911106:00 PM 75%8556566665668785%32222222222333117787888878911107:00 PM 70%7445555555557680%21122222222222955777777777988:00 PM 65%7445555555557675%21122222222222955777777777989:00 PM 50%5334344443345465%211222222222227446566665567610:00 PM 30%3222222222223345%111111111111114333333333334411:00 PM 10%1111111111111115%000000000000001111111111111112:00 AM 0%000000000000000%0000000000000000000000000000Notes:13 Total Spaces[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020.[2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code.[3] Percentage of peak parking demand factors reflect relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.1.001.001.001.0010 Guest Spc.3 Emp. Spc.WEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]Shopping Center (Typical Days)2.222--Guest Parking DemandEmployee Parking DemandShared Parking DemandSHOPPING CENTER (TYPICAL DAYS)Appendix B7.1.bPacket Pg. 133
Land UseSizeKSFPkg Rate[2]/KSFMode AdjustNon-Captive RatioGrossSpacesTime% Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec % Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Decof DayPeak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Peak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces6:00 AM 1%000000000000009%00000000000000000000000000007:00 AM 5%0000000000000014%00000000000000000000000000008:00 AM 14%1111111111111123%00000000000000111111111111119:00 AM 32%3222222222223341%111111111111114333333333334410:00 AM 54%5334344443345468%111111111111116445455554456511:00 AM 68%6444444444456586%211222222222228556666666678712:00 PM 90%8556566665668790%2112222222222210668788887881091:00 PM 90%8556566665668790%2112222222222210668788887881092:00 PM 86%8556566665668790%2112222222222210668788887881093:00 PM 77%7445555555557690%21122222222222955777777777984:00 PM 77%7445555555557690%21122222222222955777777777985:00 PM 77%7445555555557690%21122222222222955777777777986:00 PM 81%7445555555557690%21122222222222955777777777987:00 PM 72%6444444444456590%21122222222222855666666667878:00 PM 59%5334344443345481%21122222222222744656666556769:00 PM 41%4223333333334354%111111111111115334444444445410:00 PM 14%1111111111111136%111111111111112222222222222211:00 PM 5%0000000000000018%000000000000000000000000000012:00 AM 0%000000000000000%0000000000000000000000000000Notes:9 Guest Spc.2 Emp. Spc.11 Total Spaces[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020.[2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code.[3] Percentage of peak parking demand factors reflect relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.1.001.00Appendix BSHOPPING CENTER (TYPICAL DAYS)WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]Shopping Center (Typical Days)2.8144Guest Parking DemandEmployee Parking DemandShared Parking Demand1.001.007.1.bPacket Pg. 134
Land UseSizeKSFPkg Rate[2]/KSFMode AdjustNon-Captive RatioGrossSpacesTime% Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec % Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Decof DayPeak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Peak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces6:00 AM 1%0000000000000010%00000000000000000000000000007:00 AM 5%0000000000000015%00000000000000000000000000008:00 AM 30%3222222222223340%11111111111111433333333333449:00 AM 50%5334344443345475%211222222222227446566665567610:00 AM 70%6444444444456585%211222222222228556666666678711:00 AM 90%8556566665668795%21122222222222106687888878810912:00 PM 95%95566666766798100%21122222222222116688888988911101:00 PM 100%95566666766798100%21122222222222116688888988911102:00 PM 100%95566666766798100%21122222222222116688888988911103:00 PM 95%95566666766798100%21122222222222116688888988911104:00 PM 90%85565666656687100%2112222222222210668788887881095:00 PM 80%7445555555557695%21122222222222955777777777986:00 PM 75%7445555555557685%21122222222222955777777777987:00 PM 70%6444444444456580%21122222222222855666666667878:00 PM 65%6444444444456575%21122222222222855666666667879:00 PM 50%5334344443345465%111111111111116445455554456510:00 PM 30%3222222222223345%111111111111114333333333334411:00 PM 10%1111111111111115%000000000000001111111111111112:00 AM 0%000000000000000%0000000000000000000000000000Notes:11 Total Spaces[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020.[2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code.[3] Percentage of peak parking demand factors reflect relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.1.001.001.001.009 Guest Spc.2 Emp. Spc.WEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]Shopping Center (Typical Days)2.8144Guest Parking DemandEmployee Parking DemandShared Parking DemandSHOPPING CENTER (TYPICAL DAYS)Appendix B7.1.bPacket Pg. 135
Appendix Table BHEALTH CLUB - CRUNCH FITNESS (JANUARY CONDITIONS)WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSISLand Use Crunch Fitness Health ClubSize 21.440 KSFPkg Rate[1] 9.01 /KSFGross 193 SpacesSpacesSharedTime % Of # Of Parkingof Day Peak [2] Spaces Demand6:00 AM 34% 66 667:00 AM 51% 98 988:00 AM 100% 193 1939:00 AM 91% 176 17610:00 AM 87% 168 16811:00 AM 77% 149 14912:00 PM 50% 97 971:00 PM 51% 98 982:00 PM 50% 97 973:00 PM 83% 160 1604:00 PM 94% 181 1815:00 PM 92% 178 1786:00 PM 95% 183 1837:00 PM 74% 143 1438:00 PM 55% 106 1069:00 PM -- -- --10:00 PM -- -- --11:00 PM -- -- --12:00 AM -- -- --Notes:[1] The parking rate is based on empirical ratio derived from [2] Percentages based on peak demand derived from 7.1.bPacket Pg. 136
Appendix Table BHEALTH CLUB - CRUNCH FITNESS (JANUARY CONDITIONS)WEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSISLand Use Crunch Fitness Health ClubSize 21.440 KSFPkg Rate[1] 9.01 /KSFGross 193 SpacesSpacesSharedTime % Of # Of Parkingof Day Peak [2] Spaces Demand6:00 AM -- -- --7:00 AM 4% 8 88:00 AM 23% 44 449:00 AM 29% 56 5610:00 AM 31% 60 6011:00 AM 32% 62 6212:00 PM 36% 69 691:00 PM 36% 69 692:00 PM 42% 81 813:00 PM 35% 68 684:00 PM 38% 73 735:00 PM 44% 85 856:00 PM 20% 39 397:00 PM -- -- --8:00 PM -- -- --9:00 PM -- -- --10:00 PM -- -- --11:00 PM -- -- --12:00 AM -- -- --Notes:[1] The parking rate is based on empirical ratio derived from [2] Percentages based on peak demand derived from 7.1.bPacket Pg. 137
Land UseSizeKSFPkg Rate[2]/KSFMode AdjustNon-Captive RatioGrossSpacesTime% Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec % Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Decof DayPeak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Peak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces6:00 AM 1%000000000000009%11111111111111111111111111117:00 AM 5%2111111111122214%11111111111111322222222223338:00 AM 14%4223333333334323%21122222222222633555555555659:00 AM 32% 106677777777810941%3222222222233313889999999911131210:00 AM 54% 17 10 10 12 11 12 12 12 12 11 12 13 17 14 68%53444444444455221314161516161616151617221911:00 AM 68% 22 13 13 15 15 16 16 15 16 15 15 17 22 19 86%75565666655677291818212022222122202023292612:00 PM 90% 29 17 18 20 19 21 21 20 21 19 20 22 29 25 90%7556566665567736222326242727262724252836321:00 PM 90% 29 17 18 20 19 21 21 20 21 19 20 22 29 25 90%7556566665567736222326242727262724252836322:00 PM 86% 28 17 17 20 19 20 20 20 20 18 19 21 28 24 90%7556566665567735222226242626262623242735313:00 PM 77% 25 15 15 18 17 18 18 18 18 17 17 19 25 21 90%7556566665567732202024222424242422222532284:00 PM 77% 25 15 15 18 17 18 18 18 18 17 17 19 25 21 90%7556566665567732202024222424242422222532285:00 PM 77% 25 15 15 18 17 18 18 18 18 17 17 19 25 21 90%7556566665567732202024222424242422222532286:00 PM 81% 26 15 16 18 17 19 19 18 19 17 18 20 26 22 90%7556566665567733202124222525242522232633297:00 PM 72% 23 14 14 16 15 17 17 16 17 15 16 17 23 20 90%7556566665567730191922202323222320212330278:00 PM 59% 19 11 12 13 13 14 14 13 14 13 13 14 19 16 81%6445555555556625151618181919181918181925229:00 PM 41% 13889999999910131154%43333333333344171111121212121212121213171510:00 PM 14%4223333333334336%322222222223337445555555567611:00 PM 5%2111111111122218%111111111111113222222222233312:00 AM 0%000000000000000%0000000000000000000000000000Notes:32 Guest Spc.8 Emp. Spc.40 Total Spaces[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020.[2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code.[3] Percentage of peak parking demand factors reflect relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.1.001.00Appendix BSHOPPING CENTER (TYPICAL DAYS)WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]Shopping Center (Typical Days)5.510--Guest Parking DemandEmployee Parking DemandShared Parking Demand1.001.007.1.bPacket Pg. 138
Land UseSizeKSFPkg Rate[2]/KSFMode AdjustNon-Captive RatioGrossSpacesTime% Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec % Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Decof DayPeak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Peak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces6:00 AM 1%0000000000000010%11111111111111111111111111117:00 AM 5%2111111111122215%11111111111111322222222223338:00 AM 30% 106677777777810940%322222222223331388999999991113129:00 AM 50% 16 9 10 11 11 12 12 11 12 11 11 12 16 14 75%64455555555566221314161617171617161617222010:00 AM 70% 22 13 13 15 15 16 16 15 16 15 15 17 22 19 85%75565666655677291818212022222122202023292611:00 AM 90% 29 17 18 20 19 21 21 20 21 19 20 22 29 25 95%86666776766788372324262528282628252629373312:00 PM 95% 30 18 18 21 20 22 22 21 22 20 21 23 30 26 100%8666677676678838242427262929272926273038341:00 PM 100% 32 19 20 22 21 23 23 22 23 21 22 24 32 27 100%8666677676678840252628273030283027283140352:00 PM 100% 32 19 20 22 21 23 23 22 23 21 22 24 32 27 100%8666677676678840252628273030283027283140353:00 PM 95% 30 18 18 21 20 22 22 21 22 20 21 23 30 26 100%8666677676678838242427262929272926273038344:00 PM 90% 29 17 18 20 19 21 21 20 21 19 20 22 29 25 100%8666677676678837232426252828262825262937335:00 PM 80% 26 15 16 18 17 19 19 18 19 17 18 20 26 22 95%8666677676678834212224232626242623242734306:00 PM 75% 24 14 15 17 16 17 17 17 18 16 17 18 24 20 85%7556566665567731192023212323232421222431277:00 PM 70% 22 13 13 15 15 16 16 15 16 15 15 17 22 19 80%6445555555556628171720202121202120202228258:00 PM 65% 21 12 13 15 14 15 15 15 15 14 14 16 21 18 75%6445555555556627161720192020202019192127249:00 PM 50% 16 9 10 11 11 12 12 11 12 11 11 12 16 14 65%53444444444455211214151516161516151516211910:00 PM 30% 106677777777810945%433333333333441499101010101010101011141311:00 PM 10%3222222222223315%111111111111114333333333334412:00 AM 0%000000000000000%0000000000000000000000000000Notes:40 Total Spaces[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020.[2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code.[3] Percentage of peak parking demand factors reflect relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.1.001.001.001.0032 Guest Spc.8 Emp. Spc.WEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]Shopping Center (Typical Days)5.510--Guest Parking DemandEmployee Parking DemandShared Parking DemandSHOPPING CENTER (TYPICAL DAYS)Appendix B7.1.bPacket Pg. 139
Land UseSizeKSFPkg Rate[2]/KSFMode AdjustNon-Captive RatioGrossSpacesTime% Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec % Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Decof DayPeak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Peak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces6:00 AM 1%000000000000009%00000000000000000000000000007:00 AM 5%0000000000000014%00000000000000000000000000008:00 AM 14%1111111111111123%00000000000000111111111111119:00 AM 32%1111111111111141%000000000000001111111111111110:00 AM 54%2111111111122268%111111111111113222222222233311:00 AM 68%3222222222223386%111111111111114333333333334412:00 PM 90%4223333333334390%11111111111111533444444444541:00 PM 90%4223333333334390%11111111111111533444444444542:00 PM 86%3222222222223390%11111111111111433333333333443:00 PM 77%3222222222223390%11111111111111433333333333444:00 PM 77%3222222222223390%11111111111111433333333333445:00 PM 77%3222222222223390%11111111111111433333333333446:00 PM 81%3222222222223390%11111111111111433333333333447:00 PM 72%3222222222223390%11111111111111433333333333448:00 PM 59%2111111111122281%11111111111111322222222223339:00 PM 41%2111111111122254%111111111111113222222222233310:00 PM 14%1111111111111136%000000000000001111111111111111:00 PM 5%0000000000000018%000000000000000000000000000012:00 AM 0%000000000000000%0000000000000000000000000000Notes:4 Guest Spc.1 Emp. Spc.5 Total Spaces[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020.[2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code.[3] Percentage of peak parking demand factors reflect relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.1.001.00Appendix BSHOPPING CENTER (TYPICAL DAYS)WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]Shopping Center (Typical Days)1.1384Guest Parking DemandEmployee Parking DemandShared Parking Demand1.001.007.1.bPacket Pg. 140
Land UseSizeKSFPkg Rate[2]/KSFMode AdjustNon-Captive RatioGrossSpacesTime% Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec % Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Decof DayPeak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Peak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces6:00 AM 1%0000000000000010%00000000000000000000000000007:00 AM 5%0000000000000015%00000000000000000000000000008:00 AM 30%1111111111111140%00000000000000111111111111119:00 AM 50%2111111111122275%111111111111113222222222233310:00 AM 70%3222222222223385%111111111111114333333333334411:00 AM 90%4223333333334395%111111111111115334444444445412:00 PM 95%42233333333343100%11111111111111533444444444541:00 PM 100%42233333333343100%11111111111111533444444444542:00 PM 100%42233333333343100%11111111111111533444444444543:00 PM 95%42233333333343100%11111111111111533444444444544:00 PM 90%42233333333343100%11111111111111533444444444545:00 PM 80%3222222222223395%11111111111111433333333333446:00 PM 75%3222222222223385%11111111111111433333333333447:00 PM 70%3222222222223380%11111111111111433333333333448:00 PM 65%3222222222223375%11111111111111433333333333449:00 PM 50%2111111111122265%111111111111113222222222233310:00 PM 30%1111111111111145%000000000000001111111111111111:00 PM 10%0000000000000015%000000000000000000000000000012:00 AM 0%000000000000000%0000000000000000000000000000Notes:5 Total Spaces[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020.[2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code.[3] Percentage of peak parking demand factors reflect relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.1.001.001.001.004 Guest Spc.1 Emp. Spc.WEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]Shopping Center (Typical Days)1.1384Guest Parking DemandEmployee Parking DemandShared Parking DemandSHOPPING CENTER (TYPICAL DAYS)Appendix B7.1.bPacket Pg. 141
Land UseSizeKSFPkg Rate[2]/KSFMode AdjustNon-Captive RatioGrossSpacesTime% Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec % Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Decof DayPeak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Peak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces6:00 AM 1%000000000000009%11111111111111111111111111117:00 AM 5%1111111111111114%11111111111111222222222222228:00 AM 14%4223333333334323%11111111111111533444444444549:00 AM 32%8556566665668741%21122222222222106687888878810910:00 AM 54% 14 8 9 10 9 10 10 10 10 9 10 11 14 12 68%43333333333344181112131213131313121314181611:00 AM 68% 17 10 10 12 11 12 12 12 12 11 12 13 17 14 86%53444444444455221314161516161616151617221912:00 PM 90% 23 14 14 16 15 17 17 16 17 15 16 17 23 20 90%5344444444445528171820192121202119202128251:00 PM 90% 23 14 14 16 15 17 17 16 17 15 16 17 23 20 90%5344444444445528171820192121202119202128252:00 PM 86% 22 13 13 15 15 16 16 15 16 15 15 17 22 19 90%5344444444445527161719192020192019192127243:00 PM 77% 19 11 12 13 13 14 14 13 14 13 13 14 19 16 90%5344444444445524141617171818171817171824214:00 PM 77% 19 11 12 13 13 14 14 13 14 13 13 14 19 16 90%5344444444445524141617171818171817171824215:00 PM 77% 19 11 12 13 13 14 14 13 14 13 13 14 19 16 90%5344444444445524141617171818171817171824216:00 PM 81% 20 12 12 14 13 14 14 14 15 13 14 15 20 17 90%5344444444445525151618171818181917181925227:00 PM 72% 18 11 11 13 12 13 13 13 13 12 12 14 18 15 90%5344444444445523141517161717171716161823208:00 PM 59% 15 9 9 11 10 11 11 11 11 10 10 11 15 13 81%5344444444445520121315141515151514141520189:00 PM 41% 106677777777810954%3222222222233313889999999911131210:00 PM 14%4223333333334336%211222222222226335555555556511:00 PM 5%1111111111111118%111111111111112222222222222212:00 AM 0%000000000000000%0000000000000000000000000000Notes:1.001.00Appendix BSHOPPING CENTER (TYPICAL DAYS)WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]Shopping Center (Typical Days)7.8564Guest Parking DemandEmployee Parking DemandShared Parking Demand1.001.0025 Guest Spc.6 Emp. Spc.31 Total Spaces[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020.[2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code.[3] Percentage of peak parking demand factors reflect relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.7.1.bPacket Pg. 142
Land UseSizeKSFPkg Rate[2]/KSFMode AdjustNon-Captive RatioGrossSpacesTime% Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec % Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Decof DayPeak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Peak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces6:00 AM 1%0000000000000010%11111111111111111111111111117:00 AM 5%1111111111111115%11111111111111222222222222228:00 AM 30%8556566665668740%2112222222222210668788887881099:00 AM 50% 13889999999910131175%53444444444455181112131313131313131314181610:00 AM 70% 18 11 11 13 12 13 13 13 13 12 12 14 18 15 85%53444444444455231415171617171717161618232011:00 AM 90% 23 14 14 16 15 17 17 16 17 15 16 17 23 20 95%64455555555566291818212022222122202122292612:00 PM 95% 24 14 15 17 16 17 17 17 18 16 17 18 24 20 100%6445555555556630181922212222222321222330261:00 PM 100% 25 15 15 18 17 18 18 18 18 17 17 19 25 21 100%6445555555556631191923222323232322222431272:00 PM 100% 25 15 15 18 17 18 18 18 18 17 17 19 25 21 100%6445555555556631191923222323232322222431273:00 PM 95% 24 14 15 17 16 17 17 17 18 16 17 18 24 20 100%6445555555556630181922212222222321222330264:00 PM 90% 23 14 14 16 15 17 17 16 17 15 16 17 23 20 100%6445555555556629181821202222212220212229265:00 PM 80% 20 12 12 14 13 14 14 14 15 13 14 15 20 17 95%6445555555556626161619181919192018192026236:00 PM 75% 19 11 12 13 13 14 14 13 14 13 13 14 19 16 85%5344444444445524141617171818171817171824217:00 PM 70% 18 11 11 13 12 13 13 13 13 12 12 14 18 15 80%5344444444445523141517161717171716161823208:00 PM 65% 16 9 10 11 11 12 12 11 12 11 11 12 16 14 75%5344444444445521121415151616151615151621199:00 PM 50% 13889999999910131165%43333333333344171111121212121212121213171510:00 PM 30%8556566665668745%322222222223331177878888789111011:00 PM 10%3222222222223315%111111111111114333333333334412:00 AM 0%000000000000000%0000000000000000000000000000Notes:SHOPPING CENTER (TYPICAL DAYS)Appendix BWEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]Shopping Center (Typical Days)7.8564Guest Parking DemandEmployee Parking DemandShared Parking Demand1.001.001.001.0025 Guest Spc.6 Emp. Spc.31 Total Spaces[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020.[2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code.[3] Percentage of peak parking demand factors reflect relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.7.1.bPacket Pg. 143
Land UseSizeKSFPkg Rate[2]/KSFMode AdjustNon-Captive RatioGrossSpacesTime% Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec % Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Decof DayPeak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Peak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces6:00 AM 1%000000000000009%00000000000000000000000000007:00 AM 5%0000000000000014%00000000000000000000000000008:00 AM 14%0000000000000023%00000000000000000000000000009:00 AM 32%1111111111111141%000000000000001111111111111110:00 AM 54%2111111111122268%111111111111113222222222233311:00 AM 68%2111111111122286%111111111111113222222222233312:00 PM 90%3222222222223390%11111111111111433333333333441:00 PM 90%3222222222223390%11111111111111433333333333442:00 PM 86%3222222222223390%11111111111111433333333333443:00 PM 77%2111111111122290%11111111111111322222222223334:00 PM 77%2111111111122290%11111111111111322222222223335:00 PM 77%2111111111122290%11111111111111322222222223336:00 PM 81%2111111111122290%11111111111111322222222223337:00 PM 72%2111111111122290%11111111111111322222222223338:00 PM 59%2111111111122281%11111111111111322222222223339:00 PM 41%1111111111111154%111111111111112222222222222210:00 PM 14%0000000000000036%000000000000000000000000000011:00 PM 5%0000000000000018%000000000000000000000000000012:00 AM 0%000000000000000%0000000000000000000000000000Notes:1.001.00Appendix BSHOPPING CENTER (TYPICAL DAYS)WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]Shopping Center (Typical Days)1.1074Guest Parking DemandEmployee Parking DemandShared Parking Demand1.001.003 Guest Spc.1 Emp. Spc.4 Total Spaces[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020.[2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code.[3] Percentage of peak parking demand factors reflect relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.7.1.bPacket Pg. 144
Land UseSizeKSFPkg Rate[2]/KSFMode AdjustNon-Captive RatioGrossSpacesTime% Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec % Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Decof DayPeak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Peak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces6:00 AM 1%0000000000000010%00000000000000000000000000007:00 AM 5%0000000000000015%00000000000000000000000000008:00 AM 30%1111111111111140%00000000000000111111111111119:00 AM 50%2111111111122275%111111111111113222222222233310:00 AM 70%2111111111122285%111111111111113222222222233311:00 AM 90%3222222222223395%111111111111114333333333334412:00 PM 95%32222222222233100%11111111111111433333333333441:00 PM 100%32222222222233100%11111111111111433333333333442:00 PM 100%32222222222233100%11111111111111433333333333443:00 PM 95%32222222222233100%11111111111111433333333333444:00 PM 90%32222222222233100%11111111111111433333333333445:00 PM 80%2111111111122295%11111111111111322222222223336:00 PM 75%2111111111122285%11111111111111322222222223337:00 PM 70%2111111111122280%11111111111111322222222223338:00 PM 65%2111111111122275%11111111111111322222222223339:00 PM 50%2111111111122265%111111111111113222222222233310:00 PM 30%1111111111111145%000000000000001111111111111111:00 PM 10%0000000000000015%000000000000000000000000000012:00 AM 0%000000000000000%0000000000000000000000000000Notes:SHOPPING CENTER (TYPICAL DAYS)Appendix BWEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]Shopping Center (Typical Days)1.1074Guest Parking DemandEmployee Parking DemandShared Parking Demand1.001.001.001.003 Guest Spc.1 Emp. Spc.4 Total Spaces[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020.[2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code.[3] Percentage of peak parking demand factors reflect relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.7.1.bPacket Pg. 145
Land UseSizeKSFPkg Rate[2]/KSFMode AdjustNon-Captive RatioGrossSpacesTime% Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec % Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Decof DayPeak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Peak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces6:00 AM 25%6556666665656650%22222222222222877888888787887:00 AM 50% 12 11 10 12 11 12 11 12 12 11 11 11 12 11 75%2222222222222214131214131413141413131314138:00 AM 60% 14 12 12 14 13 14 13 13 13 12 13 12 14 13 90%3333333333333317151517161716161615161517169:00 AM 75% 17 15 15 17 16 17 16 16 16 15 16 15 17 16 90%33333333333333201818201920191919181918201910:00 AM 85% 20 18 17 20 19 20 19 19 19 18 19 18 20 19 100%33333333333333232120232223222222212221232211:00 AM 90% 21 18 18 21 20 21 20 20 20 19 20 19 21 20 100%33333333333333242121242324232323222322242312:00 PM 100% 23 20 20 23 22 23 22 22 22 20 21 20 23 22 100%3333333333333326232326252625252523242326251:00 PM 90% 21 18 18 21 20 21 20 20 20 19 20 19 21 20 100%3333333333333324212124232423232322232224232:00 PM 50% 12 11 10 12 11 12 11 12 12 11 11 11 12 11 100%3333333333333315141315141514151514141415143:00 PM 45% 10 9 9 10 9 10 9 10 10 9 9 9 10 10 75%2222222222222212111112111211121211111112124:00 PM 45% 10 9 9 10 9 10 9 10 10 9 9 9 10 10 75%2222222222222212111112111211121211111112125:00 PM 75% 17 15 15 17 16 17 16 16 16 15 16 15 17 16 95%3333333333333320181820192019191918191820196:00 PM 80% 18 16 16 18 17 18 17 17 17 16 17 16 18 17 95%3333333333333321191921202120202019201921207:00 PM 80% 18 16 16 18 17 18 17 17 17 16 17 16 18 17 95%3333333333333321191921202120202019201921208:00 PM 80% 18 16 16 18 17 18 17 17 17 16 17 16 18 17 95%3333333333333321191921202120202019201921209:00 PM 60% 14 12 12 14 13 14 13 13 13 12 13 12 14 13 80%22222222222222161414161516151515141514161510:00 PM 55% 13 11 11 13 12 13 12 12 12 12 12 12 13 12 65%22222222222222151313151415141414141414151411:00 PM 75% 17 15 15 17 16 17 16 16 16 15 16 15 17 16 65%22222222222222191717191819181818171817191812:00 AM 25%6556666665656635%1111111111111176677777767677Notes:[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020.1.001.00Appendix BFAMILY RESTAURANTWEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]Family Restaurant2.473--Guest Parking DemandEmployee Parking DemandShared Parking Demand1.001.0023 Guest Spc.3 Emp. Spc.26 Total Spaces[2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code.[3] Percentage of peak parking demand factors reflect relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.7.1.bPacket Pg. 146
Land UseSizeKSFPkg Rate[2]/KSFMode AdjustNon-Captive RatioGrossSpacesTime% Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec % Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Decof DayPeak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Peak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces6:00 AM 10%2222222222222249%11111111111111333333333333337:00 AM 25%6556666665656674%22222222222222877888888787888:00 AM 44% 10 9 9 10 9 10 9 10 10 9 9 9 10 10 88%3333333333333313121213121312131312121213139:00 AM 69% 16 14 14 16 15 16 15 15 15 14 15 14 16 15 88%33333333333333191717191819181818171817191810:00 AM 88% 20 18 17 20 19 20 19 19 19 18 19 18 20 19 98%33333333333333232120232223222222212221232211:00 AM 88% 20 18 17 20 19 20 19 19 19 18 19 18 20 19 98%33333333333333232120232223222222212221232212:00 PM 98% 23 20 20 23 22 23 22 22 22 20 21 20 23 22 98%3333333333333326232326252625252523242326251:00 PM 84% 19 17 17 19 18 19 18 18 18 17 18 17 19 18 98%3333333333333322202022212221212120212022212:00 PM 64% 15 13 13 15 14 15 14 14 14 13 14 13 15 14 98%3333333333333318161618171817171716171618173:00 PM 39%9889898998889974%2222222222222211101011101110111110101011114:00 PM 44% 10 9 9 10 9 10 9 10 10 9 9 9 10 10 74%2222222222222212111112111211121211111112125:00 PM 59% 14 12 12 14 13 14 13 13 13 12 13 12 14 13 93%3333333333333317151517161716161615161517166:00 PM 69% 16 14 14 16 15 16 15 15 15 14 15 14 16 15 93%3333333333333319171719181918181817181719187:00 PM 69% 16 14 14 16 15 16 15 15 15 14 15 14 16 15 93%3333333333333319171719181918181817181719188:00 PM 64% 15 13 13 15 14 15 14 14 14 13 14 13 15 14 93%3333333333333318161618171817171716171618179:00 PM 29%7667777776767779%222222222222229889999998989910:00 PM 25%6556666665656664%222222222222228778888887878811:00 PM 15%3333333333333364%222222222222225555555555555512:00 AM 10%2222222222222234%1111111111111133333333333333Notes:WEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]Appendix BFAMILY RESTAURANTFamily Restaurant2.473--Guest Parking DemandEmployee Parking DemandShared Parking Demand1.001.001.001.0023 Guest Spc.3 Emp. Spc.26 Total Spaces[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020.[2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code.[3] Percentage of peak parking demand factors reflect relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.7.1.bPacket Pg. 147
Land UseSizeKSFPkg Rate[2]/KSFMode AdjustNon-Captive RatioGrossSpacesTime% Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec % Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Decof DayPeak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Peak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces6:00 AM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000007:00 AM 0%0000000000000020%00000000000000000000000000008:00 AM 90%33333333333332100%22222222222222555555555555549:00 AM 90%33333333333332100%222222222222225555555555555410:00 AM 100%33333333333332100%222222222222225555555555555411:00 AM 100%33333333333332100%222222222222225555555555555412:00 PM 30%11111111111111100%22222222222222333333333333331:00 PM 90%33333333333332100%22222222222222555555555555542:00 PM 100%33333333333332100%22222222222222555555555555543:00 PM 100%33333333333332100%22222222222222555555555555544:00 PM 90%33333333333332100%22222222222222555555555555545:00 PM 80%22222222222222100%22222222222222444444444444446:00 PM 67%2222222222222267%11111111111111333333333333337:00 PM 30%1111111111111130%11111111111111222222222222228:00 PM 15%0000000000000015%00000000000000000000000000009:00 PM 0%000000000000000%000000000000000000000000000010:00 PM 0%000000000000000%000000000000000000000000000011:00 PM 0%000000000000000%000000000000000000000000000012:00 AM 0%000000000000000%0000000000000000000000000000Notes:[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020.1.001.00Appendix BMEDICAL/DENTAL OFFICEWEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]Medical/Dental Office1.1944Guest Parking DemandEmployee Parking DemandShared Parking Demand1.001.003 Guest Spc.2 Emp. Spc.5 Total Spaces[2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code.[3] Percentage of peak parking demand factors reflect relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.7.1.bPacket Pg. 148
Land UseSizeKSFPkg Rate[2]/KSFMode AdjustNon-Captive RatioGrossSpacesTime% Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec % Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Decof DayPeak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Peak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces6:00 AM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000007:00 AM 0%0000000000000020%00000000000000000000000000008:00 AM 90%33333333333332100%22222222222222555555555555549:00 AM 90%33333333333332100%222222222222225555555555555410:00 AM 100%33333333333332100%222222222222225555555555555411:00 AM 100%33333333333332100%222222222222225555555555555412:00 PM 30%11111111111111100%22222222222222333333333333331:00 PM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000002:00 PM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000003:00 PM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000004:00 PM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000005:00 PM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000006:00 PM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000007:00 PM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000008:00 PM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000009:00 PM 0%000000000000000%000000000000000000000000000010:00 PM 0%000000000000000%000000000000000000000000000011:00 PM 0%000000000000000%000000000000000000000000000012:00 AM 0%000000000000000%0000000000000000000000000000Notes:WEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]Appendix BMEDICAL/DENTAL OFFICEMedical/Dental Office1.1944Guest Parking DemandEmployee Parking DemandShared Parking Demand1.001.001.001.003 Guest Spc.2 Emp. Spc.5 Total Spaces[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020.[2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code.[3] Percentage of peak parking demand factors reflect relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.7.1.bPacket Pg. 149
Land UseSizeKSFPkg Rate[2]/KSFMode AdjustNon-Captive RatioGrossSpacesTime% Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec % Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Decof DayPeak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Peak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces6:00 AM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000007:00 AM 2%0000000000000050%-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-6-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-68:00 AM 25% -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 75% -10 -10 -10 -10 -10 -10 -10 -10 -10 -10 -10 -10 -10 -8 -12 -12 -12 -12 -12 -12 -12 -12 -12 -12 -12 -12 -12 -109:00 AM 75% -7 -7 -7 -7 -7 -7 -7 -7 -7 -7 -7 -7 -7 -6 90% -12 -12 -12 -12 -12 -12 -12 -11 -11 -12 -12 -12 -12 -10 -19 -19 -19 -19 -19 -19 -19 -18 -18 -19 -19 -19 -19 -1610:00 AM 20% -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 90% -12 -12 -12 -12 -12 -12 -12 -11 -11 -12 -12 -12 -12 -10 -14 -14 -14 -14 -14 -14 -14 -13 -13 -14 -14 -14 -14 -1211:00 AM 20% -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 90% -12 -12 -12 -12 -12 -12 -12 -11 -11 -12 -12 -12 -12 -10 -14 -14 -14 -14 -14 -14 -14 -13 -13 -14 -14 -14 -14 -1212:00 PM 20% -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 90% -12 -12 -12 -12 -12 -12 -12 -11 -11 -12 -12 -12 -12 -10 -14 -14 -14 -14 -14 -14 -14 -13 -13 -14 -14 -14 -14 -121:00 PM 20% -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 90% -12 -12 -12 -12 -12 -12 -12 -11 -11 -12 -12 -12 -12 -10 -14 -14 -14 -14 -14 -14 -14 -13 -13 -14 -14 -14 -14 -122:00 PM 20% -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 90% -12 -12 -12 -12 -12 -12 -12 -11 -11 -12 -12 -12 -12 -10 -14 -14 -14 -14 -14 -14 -14 -13 -13 -14 -14 -14 -14 -123:00 PM 20% -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 100% -13 -13 -13 -13 -13 -13 -13 -12 -12 -13 -13 -13 -13 -10 -15 -15 -15 -15 -15 -15 -15 -14 -14 -15 -15 -15 -15 -124:00 PM 100% -9 -9 -9 -9 -9 -9 -9 -9 -9 -9 -9 -9 -9 -7 100% -13 -13 -13 -13 -13 -13 -13 -12 -12 -13 -13 -13 -13 -10 -22 -22 -22 -22 -22 -22 -22 -21 -21 -22 -22 -22 -22 -175:00 PM 50% -5 -5 -5 -5 -5 -5 -5 -5 -5 -5 -5 -5 -5 -4 100% -13 -13 -13 -13 -13 -13 -13 -12 -12 -13 -13 -13 -13 -10 -18 -18 -18 -18 -18 -18 -18 -17 -17 -18 -18 -18 -18 -146:00 PM 20% -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 60% -8 -8 -8 -8 -8 -8 -8 -8 -8 -8 -8 -8 -8 -6 -10 -10 -10 -10 -10 -10 -10 -10 -10 -10 -10 -10 -10 -87:00 PM 5%0000000000000040%-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-4-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-48:00 PM 0%0000000000000010%-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-19:00 PM 0%000000000000000%000000000000000000000000000010:00 PM 0%000000000000000%000000000000000000000000000011:00 PM 0%000000000000000%000000000000000000000000000012:00 AM 0%000000000000000%0000000000000000000000000000Notes:1.001.00Appendix BDAYCARE CENTERWEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]Daycare Center-7.450--Guest Parking DemandEmployee Parking DemandShared Parking Demand1.001.00-9 Guest Spc.-13 Emp. Spc.-22 Total Spaces[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020.[2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code.[3] Percentage of peak parking demand factors reflect relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.7.1.bPacket Pg. 150
Land UseSizeKSFPkg Rate[2]/KSFMode AdjustNon-Captive RatioGrossSpacesTime% Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec % Of Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Dec Peak Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec L. Decof DayPeak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Peak [3] Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces6:00 AM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000007:00 AM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000008:00 AM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000009:00 AM 0%000000000000000%000000000000000000000000000010:00 AM 0%000000000000000%000000000000000000000000000011:00 AM 0%000000000000000%000000000000000000000000000012:00 PM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000001:00 PM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000002:00 PM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000003:00 PM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000004:00 PM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000005:00 PM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000006:00 PM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000007:00 PM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000008:00 PM 0%000000000000000%00000000000000000000000000009:00 PM 0%000000000000000%000000000000000000000000000010:00 PM 0%000000000000000%000000000000000000000000000011:00 PM 0%000000000000000%000000000000000000000000000012:00 AM 0%000000000000000%0000000000000000000000000000Notes:DAYCARE CENTERAppendix BWEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]Daycare Center-7.450--Guest Parking DemandEmployee Parking DemandShared Parking Demand1.001.001.001.000 Guest Spc.-22 Emp. Spc.-22 Total Spaces[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020.[2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code.[3] Percentage of peak parking demand factors reflect relationships between weekday parking demand ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as summarized in Table 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.7.1.bPacket Pg. 151
Appendix Table BHEALTH CLUB - CRUNCH FITNESS (JANUARY CONDITIONS)WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSISLand Use Crunch Fitness Health ClubSize 21.440 KSFPkg Rate[1] 9.01 /KSFGross 193 SpacesSpacesSharedTime % Of # Of Parkingof Day Peak [2] Spaces Demand6:00 AM 34% 66 667:00 AM 51% 98 988:00 AM 100% 193 1939:00 AM 91% 176 17610:00 AM 87% 168 16811:00 AM 77% 149 14912:00 PM 50% 97 971:00 PM 51% 98 982:00 PM 50% 97 973:00 PM 83% 160 1604:00 PM 94% 181 1815:00 PM 92% 178 1786:00 PM 95% 183 1837:00 PM 74% 143 1438:00 PM 55% 106 1069:00 PM -- -- --10:00 PM -- -- --11:00 PM -- -- --12:00 AM -- -- --Notes:[1] The parking rate is based on empirical ratio derived from [2] Percentages based on peak demand derived from 7.1.bPacket Pg. 152
Appendix Table BHEALTH CLUB - CRUNCH FITNESS (JANUARY CONDITIONS)WEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSISLand Use Crunch Fitness Health ClubSize 21.440 KSFPkg Rate[1] 9.01 /KSFGross 193 SpacesSpacesSharedTime % Of # Of Parkingof Day Peak [2] Spaces Demand6:00 AM -- -- --7:00 AM 4% 8 88:00 AM 23% 44 449:00 AM 29% 56 5610:00 AM 31% 60 6011:00 AM 32% 62 6212:00 PM 36% 69 691:00 PM 36% 69 692:00 PM 42% 81 813:00 PM 35% 68 684:00 PM 38% 73 735:00 PM 44% 85 856:00 PM 20% 39 397:00 PM -- -- --8:00 PM -- -- --9:00 PM -- -- --10:00 PM -- -- --11:00 PM -- -- --12:00 AM -- -- --Notes:[1] The parking rate is based on empirical ratio derived from [2] Percentages based on peak demand derived from 7.1.bPacket Pg. 153
N:\4300\2214394 - Eplex at Diamond Hills Plaza, Diamond Bar\Report\4394 Eplex Tutoring Center Parking Demand Analysis 7-15-21.doc
APPENDIX C
EXISTING DIAMOND HILLS PLAZA PARKING DEMAND COUNTS
7.1.b
Packet Pg. 154
Location:2825 S. Diamond Bar BlvdDate:8/2/2019City:Diamond Bar,CADay:FridayLotEF HMNSpace Type Regular HC VanSpace with ContainerRegular HC HC Van Regular HC Van Regular HC Van HC Regular Regular Regular HC Regular Regular HC Van HCClean Air VehicleRegular HC HC Van Regular HC HC Van Regular HC HC Van Yellow Zone Regular Regular TotalSpaces 53 1 0 15 1 1 62 1 89 1 1 60 120 37 2 82 10 1 1 3 78 1 1 20 1 1 72 20 6 6 39 158 9448:00 AM210050080260093131181000290010021200832059:00 AM25009001103310133935111500035003002920010326510:00 AM460070039059113157351138002561110040103192244411:00 AM440050053058114775361224001561110051404182150512:00 PM47007005507211498437135400066001006042319235711:00 PM45005005207911358237139500163001005732317235522:00 PM48002004706510336037131400157000005621315234873:00 PM50104004907300426136036600060000006031319235274:00 PM49106005117100395932034500155000006452420245235:00 PM47105004816400404834032900151000006752421245046:00 PM33004004506200245612026700022000006261512234007:00 PM180010040061001754712100001100000562031183118:00 PM150000040058001560601900001300000494141183039:00 PM40000029046001351101500006000004631211523310:00 PM2000001101900113910900003000001610009121TABLE C1Parking StudyPrepared by National Data & Surveying ServicesIJKLABCD G7.1.bPacket Pg. 155
Location:2825 S. Diamond Bar BlvdDate:8/3/2019City:Diamond Bar,CADay:SaturdayLotEF HMNSpace Type Regular HC VanSpace with ContainerRegular HC HC Van Regular HC Van Regular HC Van HC Regular Regular Regular HC Regular Regular HC Van HCClean Air VehicleRegular HC HC Van Regular HC HC Van Regular HC HC Van Yellow Zone Regular Regular TotalSpaces 53 1 0 15 1 1 62 1 89 1 1 60 120 37 2 82 10 1 1 3 78 1 1 20 1 1 72 20 6 6 39 158 9448:00 AM100000060210172611024000270010014110441409:00 AM20001002203301102912011400040001004521210925310:00 AM300000037055012549140236002450010049513112037711:00 AM330000053084114162240356001520010055535102549712:00 PM3700000510850143692403751004000000486357244861:00 PM3800000581791145632202950112100000476265254562:00 PM4110000531800135552102740001910000433165204173:00 PM4300000490810138522201860001310000383032243944:00 PM4000000530731135511701430001900100444154233895:00 PM390000046061012858801100011700000458252213536:00 PM320000039058013055801500011100000448331213307:00 PM19100002904601226070200000400000401111142678:00 PM120000016051012153906000010000030105182159:00 PM90000090310114534010000100000221121515510:00 PM600000401101416300000010010030001758TABLE C2Parking StudyPrepared by National Data & Surveying ServicesIJKLABCD G7.1.bPacket Pg. 156
7.1.cPacket Pg. 157
7.1.cPacket Pg. 158
7.1.cPacket Pg. 159
7.1.cPacket Pg. 160
Project Status Report CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
August 24, 2021 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
LEGEND PH = PUBLIC HEARING
X = NON PUBLIC HEARING
AP = ASSIGNED PLANNER
PC = PLANNING COMMISSION
AR = ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
CC = CITY COUNCIL
PROPERTY LOCATION
PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW File # AP Applicant PC
8/24/21
CC
9/7/21
PC
9/14/21
CC
9/21/21
PC
9/28/21
CC
10/5/21
2751 S. Diamond Bar Blvd.
(Amendment to CUP PL2010-89 for after
school component)
Amendment to CUP
PL2021-39
JT Lance Kim PH
57/60 Confluence Project Phase III
General Plan Conformity
PL2021-66 MN City of Diamond Bar X
24011 Falcons View Dr.
(Addition and remodel to single family
residence)
DR, MCUP, TP PL2020-25 MN William Edwards PH
1139 S. Diamond Bar Blvd., Ste F
(CUP for fitness studio) CUP PL2021-30 JT Shawn Zuo PH
Small Wireless Ordinance 2nd Reading DCA PL2021-44 MN City of Diamond Bar X
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
Property Location AP Applicant
None
PENDING ITEMS
Property Location File # AP Applicant Status
1625 Bears Den Rd.
(Addition to single family residence)
DR PL2021-01 MN Pete Volbeda Under review
850 Brea Canyon Rd.
(Modification to hotel and office project)
TPM/CUP/DR/PP/CSP
PL2017-169
GL Philip Lee First incomplete letter sent 8/12/21 – waiting for additional information
1198 Chisolm Trail Dr.
(New single-family residence)
DR PL2021-51 JT Michael Wu First incomplete letter sent 7/21/21 – waiting for additional information
Crooked Creek
(7-unit subdivision)
TTM, DR, CUP, TP
PL2017-203
MN New Bridge Homes Fourth incomplete letter sent 7/15/21 – waiting for additional information
2001 Derringer Ln.
(2-lot subdivision)
TPM 83036
PL2021-46
MN
Gurbachan S. Juneja First incomplete letter sent 6/24/21 – waiting for additional information
Gentle Springs Ln. and S. Prospectors
Rd.
GPA, ZC, VTTM, DR
PL2021-23
GL/
JT
Tranquil Garden LLC First incomplete letter sent 4/16/21 – waiting for additional information
9.1
Packet Pg. 161
Project Status Report CITY OF DIAMOND BAR Page 2
August 24, 2021 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PENDING ITEMS (continued)
Property Location File # AP Applicant Status
21130 Golden Springs Dr.
(Amendment to MCUP for hookah
lounge)
Amendment to MCUP
PL2019-122
JT MHD Marwan
Almannini
First incomplete letter sent 7/28/21 – waiting for additional information
2234 Indian Creek Rd.
(New single-family residence)
DR PL2020-159 MN/
JT
Jeffrey Sun First incomplete letter sent 1/12/21 – waiting for additional information
22909 Lazy Trail Rd.
(Addition and remodel to single family
residence)
DR PL2021-5 JT Walt Petroske Under review
23121 Ridge Line Rd.
(New single family residence)
DR PL2020-31 NTE/
MN
Pete Volbeda Under review
2631 Rocky Trail Rd.
(Addition and remodel to single family
residence)
DR, MCUP PL2021-22 GL Katy Liu Under review
Walnut Valley Unified School District
(Billboard Ordinance)
PL2021-43 GL/
MN
WVUSD Under review
9.1
Packet Pg. 162
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
AND AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR )
I, Stella Marquez, Administrative Coordinator for the City of Diamond Bar, CA, declare as
follows:
I hereby certify, under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that
on August 20, 20211 1 posted the August 24, 2021, Planning Commission Agenda,
pursuant to Government Code Section 54950 et.seq. at the following locations:
Diamond Bar City Hall, 21810 Copley Drive
SCAQMD/Government Center, 21865 Copley Drive
Heritage Park, 2900 Brea Canyon Road
City website: www.diamondbarca.gov
Due to COVID-19 closures, the agenda could not be posted at the following regular
posting locations:
Diamond Bar Library
Executed on August 20, 2021, at Diamond Bar, California.
U110)
Stella Marquez
Community Deve ent Dept.
g:\ls\affidavitposting.doc