HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/27/2021PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA
______________________________________________
July 27, 2021
6:30 PM
Diamond Bar City Hall – Windmill Community Room
21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765
PUBLIC ADVISORY:
Consistent to the Governor’s Executive Order, members of the public are encouraged to participate and
address the Planning Commission during the public comment portion of the meeting via teleconference.
Members of the Planning Commission and limited staff may be physically present for this meeting. If you
would like to attend the meeting in person, please note that face coverings are required to be worn at all
times.
_______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
How to Observe the Meeting from Home:
Members of the public can observe the meeting by calling +1 (631) 992 -3221 , Access Code 927-049-
576 or visiting https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/8873681576196292879
How to Submit Public Comment:
Members of the public may provide public comment by sending written comments to the Minutes Secretary by
email at Planning@DiamondBarCA.gov by 5:30 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Please indicate in the
Subject Line “FOR PUBLIC COMMENT.” Written comments will be distributed to the Planning Commission
members and read into the record at the meeting, up to a maximum of five minutes.
Alternatively, public comment may be submitted by logging onto the meeting through this link:
https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/8873681576196292879 . Members of the public will be
called upon one at a time during the Public Comment portion of the agenda. Speakers are limited to five
minutes per agenda item, unless the Chairperson determines otherwise.
Accommodations for Persons with Disabilities:
Pursuant to the Executive Order, and in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need
special assistance to participate in the Planning Commission Meeting, please contact the Community
Development Department at (909) 839-7030 within 72 hours of the meeting. Commission recordings will be
available upon request the day following the Planning Commission Meeting. If requested, the agenda will be
made available in an alternative format to a person with disability as required by Section 202 of the Americans
with Disabilities Act of 1990.
CHAIRPERSON WILLIAM RAWLINGS
VICE CHAIRPERSON MAHENDRA GARG
COMMISSIONER NAILA BARLAS
COMMISSIONER KENNETH MOK
COMMISSIONER RAYMOND WOLFE
City of Diamond Bar
Planning Commission
MEETING RULES
PUBLIC INPUT
Members of the public may address the Planning Commission on any item of business on the
agenda during the time the item is taken up by the Planning Commission. In addition, members
of the public may, during the Public Comment period address the Planning Commission on any
Consent Calendar item or any matter not on the agenda and within the Planning Commission’s
subject matter jurisdiction. Any material to be submitted to the Planning Commission at the
meeting should be submitted through the Minutes Secretary.
Speakers are limited to five minutes per agenda item, unless the Chairperson determines
otherwise. The Chairperson may adjust this time limit depending on the number of people
wishing to speak, the complexity of the matter, the length of the agenda, the hour and any other
relevant consideration. Speakers may address the Planning Commission only once on an
agenda item, except during public hearings, when the applicant/appellant may be afforded a
rebuttal.
Public comments must be directed to the Planning Commission. Behavior that disrupts the
orderly conduct of the meeting may result in the speaker being removed from the meeting.
INFORMATION RELATING TO AGENDAS AND ACTIONS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Agendas for regular Planning Commission meetings are available 72 hours prior to the meeting
and are posted in the City’s regular posting locations and on the City’s website at
www.diamondbarca.gov. The Planning Commission may take action on any item listed on the
agenda.
Copies of staff reports or other written documentation relating to agenda items are on file in the
Planning Division of the Community Development Depart ment, located at 21810 Copley Drive,
and are available for public inspection upon request. If you have questions regar ding an agenda
item, please call (909) 839-7030 during regular business hours.
HELPFUL CONTACT INFORMATION
Copies of Agenda, Rules of the Planning Commission, Recordings of Meetings (909) 839-7030
Email: info@diamondbarca.gov
Website: www.diamondbarca.gov
The City of Diamond Bar thanks you in advance for taking all precautions to prevent spreading the
COVID-19 virus.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
PLANNING COMMISSION
July 27, 2021
AGENDA
Next Resolution No. 2021-11
CALL TO ORDER: 6:30 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
1. ROLL CALL: COMMISSIONERS: Naila Barlas, Kenneth Mok, Raymond
Wolfe, Vice Chairperson Mahendra Garg, Chairperson William Rawlings
2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Chairperson
3. PUBLIC COMMENTS:
"Public Comments" is the time reserved on each regular meeting agenda to
provide an opportunity for members of the public to directly address the Planning
Commission on consent calendar items or other matters of interest not on the
agenda that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the council. Although the
Planning Commission values your comments, pursuant to the brown act,
members of the Planning Commission or staff may briefly respond to public
comments if necessary, but no extended discussion and no action on such
matters may take place. There is a five -minute maximum time limit when
addressing the Planning Commission. Please complete a speaker card and hand
it to the Minutes Secretary (completion of this form is volunta ry). The city will call
on in person speakers first and then teleconference callers, one at a time to give
their name and if there is an agenda item number they wish to speak on before
providing their comment. If you wish to speak on a public hearing item or
Planning Commission consideration item, you will then be called upon to speak
at that point in the agenda.
4. CONSENT CALENDAR:
The following items listed on the consent calendar are considered routine and
are approved by a single motion. Consent calendar items may be removed from
the agenda by request of the Planning Commission only:
4.1 Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting – July 13, 2021
5. OLD BUSINESS:
5.1 Conditional Use Permit No. PL2021-18 – On June 22, 2021, after
closing the public hearing, the Planning Commission directed staff to
prepare a Resolution to deny the applicant’s request to establish a
medical laboratory use.
JULY 27, 2021 PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION
PROJECT ADDRESS: 3333 Diamond Canyon Road, Suite 100
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
APPLICANT: Jordan Wang for Innova Biolab
1977 N. Garey Ave
Pomona, CA 91767
PROPERTY OWNER: Teresa Cheung
1142 S. Diamond Bar Blvd #423
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt a
resolution denying Conditional Use Permit PL2021-18.
6. NEW BUSINESS: None.
7. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS:
7.1 Conditional Use Permit No. PL2021-19 – Under the authority of DBMC
Section 22.58, the applicant, Steve Lee, is requesting Conditional Use
Permit approval to operate a fitness studio in a 3,966 square-foot lease
space located at Golden Springs Plaza. The subject property is zoned
Regional Commercial (C-3) with an underlying General Plan land use
designation of General Commercial. (Continued from July 13, 2021)
PROJECT ADDRESS: 20657 Golden Springs Dr., Suite 111A
Diamond Bar, CA 91789
APPLICANT: Steve Lee
3935 Landmark Ln.
Brea, CA 92823
PROPERTY OWNER: Golden Springs Asset LLC
20657 Golden Springs Dr., Suite 201
Diamond Bar, CA 91789
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
approve Conditional Use Permit No. PL2021-19, based on the findings of fact,
and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the draft resolution.
8. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS / INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
9. STAFF COMMENTS / INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
JULY 27, 2021 PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION
10. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS:
11. ADJOURNMENT:
CITY COUNCIL MEETING: Tuesday, August 3, 2021, 6:30 pm
PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING:
Tuesday, August 10, 2021, 6:30 pm
CITY COUNCIL MEETING: Tuesday, August 17, 2021, 6:30 pm
PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING:
Tuesday, August 24, 2021, 6:30 pm
LABOR DAY HOLIDAY: Monday, September 6, 2021
In observance of the holiday, city offices will
be closed. City offices will re-open on
Tuesday, September 7, 2021
MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
DIAMOND BAR CITY HALL WINDMILL COMMUNITY ROOM
21810 COPLEY DRIVE, DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765
JULY 13, 2021
CALL TO ORDER:
Chair/Rawlings called the meeting to order at 6:31 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Chairman Rawlings led the Pledge of Allegiance.
1. ROLL CALL: Commissioners: Naila Barlas, Kenneth Mok, Raymond
Wolfe, Chairman William Rawlings
Absent: Vice Chairman Mahendra Garg was excused.
Staff Present : Greg Gubman, Community Development Director; James
Eggart, Assistant City Attorney; Grace Lee, Senior Planner; Mayuko (May) Nakajima,
Associate Planner; Joy Tsai, Assistant Planner; Stella Marquez, Administrative Coordinator;
Alfredo Estevez, Information Systems Analyst.
2. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: None Offered.
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: As presented
4. CONSENT CALENDAR:
4.1 Minutes of the Regular Planning Commission Meeting of June 22, 2021.
C/Mok moved, C/Barlas seconded, to approve Consent Calendar as presented.
Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Barlas, Mok, Wolfe, VC/Garg,
Chair/Rawlings
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None
5. OLD BUSINESS:
5.1 Conditional Use Permit No. PL2021-18 – Planning Commission directed staff
to prepare a Resolution to Deny the project.
PROJECT ADDRESS: 3333 Diamond Canyon Road, Suite 100
Diamond Bar, CA 91789
4.1
Packet Pg. 6
__________________________________________________________________________
JULY 13, 2021 PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION
__________________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT: Jordan Wang for Innova Biolab
1977 N. Garey Avenue
Pomona, CA 91767
PROPERTY OWNER: Teresa Cheung
1142 S. Diamond Bar Boulevard #423
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
CDD/Gubman recommended that the Planning Commission continue the matter
to the July 27, 2021, Planning Commission meeting.
C/Wolfe moved, C/Mok seconded, to move the matter to the July 27, 2021,
Planning Commission meeting. Motion carried by the following Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Barlas, Mok, Wolfe, Chair/Rawlings
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: VC/Garg
6. NEW BUSINESS: None.
7. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING(S):
7.1 Conditional Use Permit No. PL2021-19 – Under the authority of Diamond Bar
Municipal Code Section 22.58, the applicant, Steve Lee, requested Conditional
Use Permit approval to operate a fitness studio in a 3,966 square foot lease space
located at Golden Springs Plaza. The subject property is zoned Regional
Commercial (C-3) with an underlying General Plan land use designation of
General Commercial.
PROJECT ADDRESS: 20657 Golden Springs Drive, Suite 111A
Diamond Bar, CA 91789
APPLICANT: Steve Lee
3935 Landmark Lane
Brea, CA 92823
PROPERTY OWNER: Golden Springs Asset LLC
20657 Golden Springs Drive, Suite 201
Diamond Bar, CA 91789
AP/Tsai presented staff’s report and recommended the Planning Commission
keep the public hearing open and continue the matt er to the July 27, 2021,
Planning Commission meeting.
4.1
Packet Pg. 7
__________________________________________________________________________
JULY 13, 2021 PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION
__________________________________________________________________________
C/Barlas moved, C/Wolfe seconded, to continue the public hearing to the July 27,
2021, Planning Commission meeting. Motion carried by the following Roll Call
vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Barlas, Mok, Wolfe, Chair/Rawlings
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: VC/Garg
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
8.1 Tentative Parcel Map No. 83371 (Case No. PL2021 -15) – Under the authority
of DBMC Title 21, the applicant, Samir M. Khoury of Coory Engineering,
requested approval to create a two-lot subdivision. The subject property consists
of approximately 3.52 acres at the southwest corner of Diamond Bar Boulevard
and Morning Canyon Road, with approximately half of the site developed as a
church. Proposed Parcel 1 will be 76,728 square feet (1.76 acres) and proposed
Parcel 2 will be 76,729 square feet (1.76 acres). The subject property is zoned
Medium Density Residential (RM) with an underlying General Plan land use
designation of Medium Density Residential.
PROJECT ADDRESS: 2335 S. Diamond Bar Boulevard
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
APPLICANT: Samir M. Khoury, Coory Engineering
1718 N. Neville Street
Orange, CA 92865
PROPERTY OWNER: Southern California Nevada
Conference of the United Church of Christ
2335 S. Diamond Bar Boulevard
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
AP/Tsai presented staff’s report and recommended Planning Commission
adoption of a Resolution recommending that the City Council approve Tentative
Parcel Map No. 83371 (Planning Case No. PL2021-15), based on the Findings
of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval within the Resolution.
AP/Tsai responded to C/Mok that there were no other telephone calls, emails or
letters via regular mail submitted from residents inquiring about this project other
than a phone call and email received after the staff report was published.
Chair/Rawlings opened the public hearing.
4.1
Packet Pg. 8
__________________________________________________________________________
JULY 13, 2021 PAGE 4 PLANNING COMMISSION
__________________________________________________________________________
James Ling, Coory Engineering, on behalf of the church and its members,
reiterated that no construction or modifications to the existing church building are
proposed in conjunction with the proposed subdivision. He thanked the Public
Works Department and Planning Division staff for their assistance and stated he
read and concurs with the conditions of approval as stated in the staff report.
Linda Russell asked how parking would be handled if a new community is built
across the street from her house since the area suffers from traffic and parking
issues currently, whether a traffic signal would be installed at the bottom of the
hill, how it would affect property values, and whether trees would be removed.
AP/Tsai responded to Ms. Russell that currently, there is no project proposed.
When a project comes to the City for Development Review, the parking will be
reviewed based on the number of units proposed for the project and the project
will be required to accommodate a specific number of on-site parking spaces.
This subdivision request does not include removal of existing trees along the
perimeter of the project site and future development of the project will address
any potential traffic concerns and landscaping.
Chair/Rawlings closed the public hearing.
C/Wolfe moved, C/Mok seconded, to adopt a Resolution recommending City
Council approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 83371 (Planning Case
No. PL2021-15), based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of
approval as listed within the Resolution. Motion carried by the following Roll Call
vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Barlas, Mok, Wolfe, Chair/Rawlings
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: VC/Garg
8.2 Conditional Use Permit No. PL2020-120 – Under the authority of Diamond Bar
Municipal Code Section 22.58, the applicant, Dr. Ratul Kumar and property
owner, ROIC, requested Conditional Use Permit approval to operate a 3,620
square-foot veterinary clinic (Grand Animal Hospital) at the Diamond Bar Towne
Center. The subject property is zoned Regional Commercial (C-3) with an
underlying General Plan land use designation of General Commercial.
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1114 S. Diamond Bar Boulevard
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
4.1
Packet Pg. 9
__________________________________________________________________________
JULY 13, 2021 PAGE 5 PLANNING COMMISSION
__________________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT: Dr. Ratul Kumar
1114 S. Diamond Bar Boulevard
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
PROPERTY OWNER: Courtney Pease, ROIC
11250 El Camino Real #200
San Diego, CA 92130
AP/Nakajima presented staff’s report and recommended Planning Commission
approval of Conditional Use Permit No. PL2020 -120, based on the Findings of
Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed in the Resolution. It was
noted that there is a discrepancy in the draft resolution and staff is recommending
Condition of Approval #6 be revised to state the following:
Prior to the issuance of a final Certificate of Occupancy for the veterinary clinic,
the property owner shall: 1) apply for and receive City approval of a parking
restriping plan that results in a net increase in parking spaces to eliminate the
parking deficit generated by the Proposed Use; and 2) complete the restriping of
the subject property in substantial conformance with the approved plan.
C/Wolfe thanked AP/Nakajima for the correction of Item 6 on the Resolution and
for providing more detail on the proposed sound control measures for the
demising walls and ceiling because he was concerned that the adjoining
businesses not be disrupted. He asked AP/Nakajima to repeat the STC rating of
the special drywall for this project to which she responded 48-60.
C/Mok asked about the restriping of both sides for an additional 18 pa rking
spaces in front of Walmart which are currently set aside for pickup and whether
this project infringes on some of Walmart’s parking requirements for pickup and
delivery. AP/Nakajima responded that the property management company has
been working with Walmart to come up with a restriping plan that works for both
Walmart and the proposed veterinary hospital and their plan was submitted to the
Building and Safety Division last week for plan check. CDD/Gubman said that
C/Mok is correct that the pickup is in the area he referenced and C/Mok
responded that he was satisfied with the property manager and Walmart working
together with the new tenant for the benefit of all.
Chair/Rawlings opened the public hearing.
Dr. Kumar spoke about his dream of opening an animal hospital in Diamond Bar
where he grew up. In studying the area, he learned that a vast majority of
individuals were taking their pets outside of the city for care because the two
general practice hospital and one emergency hospital were insufficient to service
the animal population in Diamond Bar. He added that any pet waste will be
4.1
Packet Pg. 10
__________________________________________________________________________
JULY 13, 2021 PAGE 6 PLANNING COMMISSION
__________________________________________________________________________
cleaned up in a timely manner as this would not reflect positively on the business.
Dr. Kumar also explained that hospitals and sick animals generally do not
produce a lot of noise.
Chair/Rawlings closed the public hearing.
C/Wolfe moved, C/Barlas seconded, to approve Conditional Use Permit No.
PL2020-120, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of
approval as listed within the resolution. Motion carried by the following Roll Call
vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Barlas, Mok, Wolfe, Chair/Rawlings
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: VC/Garg
8.3 Development Code Amendment PL2021-44 – Under the authority of Diamond
Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Section 22.70, the City of Diamond Bar proposes to
amend the following sections of Title 22 of the DBMC (“Development Code”) to
enact regulations governing the deployment, augmentation and relocation of
small wireless facilities in the City, in accordance with State and Federal law by
adding a new Section 22.42.135 and amending Sections 22.42.130, 22.44.020,
22.74.030 and 22.74.040.
PROJECT ADDRESS: CITYWIDE
APPLICANT: City of Diamond Bar
Community Development Department
C/Wolfe commented that the staff report had detailed information and requested
to forgo staff’s presentation if there are no public comments.
Chair/Rawlings opened the public hearing.
Chair/Rawlings closed the public hearing.
C/Wolfe moved, C/Barlas seconded, to adopt a Resolution recommending City
Council approval of Development Code Amendment (Planning Case
No. PL2021-44). Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Barlas, Mok, Wolfe, Chair/Rawlings
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: VC/Garg
4.1
Packet Pg. 11
__________________________________________________________________________
JULY 13, 2021 PAGE 7 PLANNING COMMISSION
__________________________________________________________________________
9. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
10. STAFF COMMENTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
11. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS:
As listed in the agenda.
ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Planning Commission,
Chair/Rawlings adjourned the regular meeting at 7:39 p.m.
The foregoing minutes are hereby approved this 27th day July, 2021.
Attest:
Respectfully Submitted,
_______________________________________
Greg Gubman, Community Development Director
______________________________
William Rawlings, Chairperson
4.1
Packet Pg. 12
PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 5.1
MEETING DATE: July 27, 2021
CASE/FILE NUMBER: Conditional Use Permit No. PL2021-18
PROJECT LOCATION:
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION:
3333 Diamond Canyon Road, Suite 100
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
(APN 8269-011-015)
Office
ZONING DISTRICT: Professional Office (OP)
PROPERTY OWNER:
APPLICANT:
Teresa Cheung
1142 S Diamond Bar Blvd #423
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
Jordan Wang
Innova Biolab
1977 N Garey Ave
Pomona, CA 91767
SUMMARY:
On June 22, 2021, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing
regarding a request for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to operate a medical laboratory
use for Innova Biolab, a clinical laboratory in a 19,501 square -foot space at an existing
office building on a 3.37-acre (143,748 square-foot) site. Staff presented the project to
the Planning Commission recommending approval of the project, subject to conditions.
Prior to the public hearing, staff received phone calls, emails, a petition and letter s of
opposition from residents of the Diamond Canyon community . All written
communications received were forwarded to the Commission. Sixteen residents spoke
at the public hearing in opposition to the project. The residents raised health concerns
related to the laboratory use, specifically regarding the applicant being engaged in the
manufacturing of COVID-19 test kits. Among other things, the residents felt that this
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ~ 21810 COPLEY DRIVE ~ DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 ~ TEL. (909) 839-7030 ~ FAX (909) 861-3117
5.1
Packet Pg. 13
Conditional Use Permit No. PL2021-18 Page 2 of 3
use would endanger the health, safety and welfare of the residents, and that it will
depress property values due to the stigma and fear associated with the virus. In light of
the deadly COVID-19 global pandemic, which causes anxiety and fear with the virus,
the Commission found that the proposed use was inappropriate adjacent to a single-
family residential neighborhood and church.
The site for which the use is proposed is surrounded by single-family residences to the
west, an open space hillside to the north, a church and preschool to the south, and the
57 freeway to the east. Figure 7-6 of the Diamond Bar General Plan shows that all of
these properties are located within a High Fire Hazard Severity Zone. Diamond Canyon
Road is the only point of access to the subject property, the residences and
church/preschool, and is thus the only available evacuation route in the event of an
emergency. In addition to the existing risk of a wildland fire, the potential risk of a
biohazard emergency associated with the proposed use may pose a safety risk by
impeding the neighborhood’s single evacuation route.
After closing the public hearing, the Planning Commission, by a 3-2 vote, directed staff
to: 1) prepare a resolution denying the request based on findings that the proposed use
would be incompatible with the surrounding uses, and would be detrimental to the public
interest, health, safety and/or welfare; and 2) place the resolution on the July 13, 2021,
agenda for adoption. Since Commissioner Garg was absent from the July 13, 2021,
meeting, staff recommended that the Planning Commission continue the matter to
July 27, 2021, to allow all five Commissioners to vote on the draft resolution denying the
CUP.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt a resolution denying Conditional
Use Permit PL2021-18.
PREPARED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
Attachments:
5.1
Packet Pg. 14
Conditional Use Permit No. PL2021-18 Page 3 of 3
A. Draft Resolution No. 2021-XX
B. Planning Commission Staff Report Dated June 22, 2021
C. Draft Minutes from the June 22, 2021 Planning Commission Meeting
5.1
Packet Pg. 15
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. PL2021-18, TO OPERATE A MEDICAL
LABORATORY USE FOR INNOVA BIOLAB, A CLINICAL LABORATORY IN A
19,501 SQUARE-FOOT SPACE AT AN EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING LOCATED AT
3333 DIAMOND CANYON ROAD, SUITE 100, DIAMOND BAR, CA (APN 8269-011-015).
A. RECITALS
1. The property owner, Teresa Cheung, and applicant, Jordan Wang for Innova
Biolab, have filed an application for Conditional Use Permit No. PL 2021-18 to
operate a medical laboratory use for Innova Biolab, a clinical laboratory in a
19,501 square-foot space at an existing office building. The project site is more
specifically described as 3333 Diamond Canyon Road, Suite 100, Diamond Bar,
Los Angeles County, California. Hereinafter in this resolution, the subject
Conditional Use Permit shall be referred to as the “Proposed Use.”
2. The subject property is comprised of a 3.37 gross acre parcel. It is located in the
Professional Office (OP) zone with a General Plan land use designation of Office.
3. The subject property is legally described as Lot 1 of Tract No. 50415. The
Assessor’s Parcel Number is 8269-011-015.
4. On June 9, 2021, public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a
1,000-foot radius of the Project site. On June 11, 2021, notification of the public
hearing for this project was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune newspaper
and posted at the City’s designated community posting sites.
5. On June 22, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted
a duly noticed public hearing, received a staff report and information concerning
the Proposed Use from City Staff, solicited testimony and evidence from the
applicant and all other interested individuals, and concluded said hearing on that
date. The applicant and all other interested individuals were given an opportunity
to be fully heard and to present evidence at the public hearing .
6. After the close of the public hearing, t he Planning Commission gave due and
careful consideration to the matter and, upon a motion duly passed 3-2, directed
staff to prepare a resolution for denial of the Proposed Use based on the facts and
information contained in the oral and written record.
7. The documents and materials constituting the administrative record of the
proceedings upon which the Planning Commission’s decision is based are located
at the City of Diamond Bar, Community Development Department, Planning
Division, 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765.
5.1.a
Packet Pg. 16
Page 2
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2021-XX
B. RESOLUTION
NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission
of the City of Diamond Bar as follows:
1. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in
the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct;
2. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth below, the Proposed Use is
denied.
3. Because the Proposed Use is denied, the Proposed Use is exempt from the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to the
provisions of Article 19, Section 15270(a) of the CEQA Guidelines.
C. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
Based upon the totality of the information provided and substantial evi dence in the
administrative record, the Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that the
proposed use is not compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and will be
detrimental to the health, safety and welfare of the residents contemplated by
Chapter 22.58 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code . Based on the above, the following
two (2) findings required for approval of a Conditional Use Permit pursuant to DBMC
Section 22.58.040 cannot be made:
1. “(3) The design, location, size and operating characteristics of the Proposed Use
are compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity.”
2. “(5) Granting the conditional use permit will not be detrimental to the public
interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or injurious to persons, property,
or improvements in the vicinity and zoning district in which the property is located .”
The facts and reasons supporting this determination include the following:
The Proposed Use includes a laboratory for the testing of pathogens from samples
obtained offsite from patients. Byproducts of the Proposed Use include
biohazardous waste that would be temporarily stored on the premises. In light of
the ongoing and deadly COVID-19 global pandemic, the residents that live in
proximity to the Proposed Use perceive an increased risk of infection due to such
proximity. The fear and anxiety stemming from this perception is so intense that
the establishment of the Proposed Use at this time would have a negative impact
on the quality of life for the nearby residents, and would thus be incompatible with
existing uses in the vicinity.
The site for which the Use is proposed is surrounded by single-family residences
to the west, an open space hillside to the north, a church and preschool to the
south, and the 57 freeway to the east. Figure 7-6 of the Diamond Bar General
Plan shows that all of these properties are located within a High Fire Hazard
Severity Zone. Diamond Canyon Road is the only point of access to the subject
property, the residences and church/preschool, and is thus the only available
5.1.a
Packet Pg. 17
Page 3
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2021-XX
evacuation route in the event of an emergency. In addition to the existing risk of a
wildland fire, the potential risk of a biohazard emergency associated with the
Proposed Use may pose a safety risk by impeding the neighborhood’s single
evacuation route.
Staff received phone calls, emails, a petition and letters of opposition from
residents of the adjacent residential community. Sixteen residents from this
community testified at the public hearing and expressed concerns about the
incompatibility of the proposed laboratory use with the other land uses in the
vicinity. Concerns expressed by individuals who identified themselves as living in
the immediate vicinity of the Proposed Use, or representing such individuals,
included, but were not limited to, perceived increase in risks associated with
biological infection, exposure to hazardous waste and chemicals, and not being
able to safely evacuate in the event of a biohazard, fire, or other emergency on the
site of the Proposed Use due to the single point of ingress/egress to the subject
property, residences, and church. Several owners and residents of properties in
the vicinity also testified that the proximity of the Proposed Use and the perceived
additional risks associated with it would depress their residential property values
and the perceived desirability of living in the community.
In light of the foregoing facts, the findings necessary for approval of the requested
Conditional Use Permit cannot be made.
The Planning Commission shall:
a. Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and
b. Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail to the
property owner, Teresa Cheung, 1142 S. Diamond Bar Blvd #423, Diamond Bar,
CA 91765; and applicant, Jordan Wang for Innova Biolab, 1977 N. Garey Ave,
Pomona, CA 91767.
D. RELIANCE ON RECORD
Unless otherwise provided, each and every one of the findings and conclusions in this
Resolution are based on the competent and substantial evidence, both oral and written,
contained in the entire record relating to the Proposed Project. The findings and
conclusions constitute the independent findings and conclusions of the Planning
Commission in all respects and are fully and completely supported by substantial
evidence in the record as a whole. Unless otherwise provided, all summarie s of
information in this Resolution are based on the substantial evidence in the record. The
absence of any particular fact from any such summary is not an indication that a particular
finding is not based in part on that fact.
5.1.a
Packet Pg. 18
Page 4
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2021-XX
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF JULY 2021, BY THE PLANNING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR.
By: ______________________________________
William Rawlings, Chairperson
I, Greg Gubman, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 27th day of July 2021, by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners:
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST: ___________________________
Greg Gubman, Secretary
5.1.a
Packet Pg. 19
PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 7.2
MEETING DATE: June 22, 2021
CASE/FILE NUMBER: Conditional Use Permit Planning Case No.
PL2021-18
PROJECT LOCATION:
3333 Diamond Canyon Road, Suite 100
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
(APN 8269-011-015)
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Office
ZONING DISTRICT: Professional Office (OP)
PROPERTY OWNER:
Teresa Cheung
1142 S Diamond Bar Blvd #423
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
APPLICANT:
Jordan Wang
Innova Biolab
1977 N Garey Ave
Pomona, CA 91767
SUMMARY:
The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to operate a
medical laboratory use for Innova Biolab, a clinical laboratory in a 19,501 square -foot
space at an existing office building on a 3.37-acre (143,748 square-foot) site.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the attached Resolution (Attachment 1) approving Conditional Use Permit
No. PL2021-18, based on the findings of Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC)
Section 22.58, subject to conditions.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ~ 21810 COPLEY DRIVE ~ DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 ~ TEL. (909) 839-7030 ~ FAX (909) 861-3117
7.2
Packet Pg. 32
5.1.b
Packet Pg. 20
Conditional Use Permit Planning Case No. PL2021-18
Page 2 of 8
BACKGROUND:
The property was developed in 1989 with a 36,748 square-foot office building. The
building was originally occupied by Biosense Webster (Johnson & Johnson company),
followed by other office use tenants, but has been vacant for approximately two years.
The building floor plan is divided into two spaces, a 17,247 square-foot space and a
19,501 square-foot space. There are 167 total off-street parking spaces on site.
The property is legally described as Lot 1 of Tract No. 50415. The Assessor’s Parcel
Number (APN) is 8269-011-015.
Site and Surrounding General Plan, Zoning and Land Uses
The project site is located on the north side of Diamond Canyon Road and west of the
State Route 57 freeway. The site is surrounded by single -family residences to the west,
an open space hillside to the north, and church to the south.
Site (Plan View) Aerial
7.2
Packet Pg. 33
5.1.b
Packet Pg. 21
Conditional Use Permit Planning Case No. PL2021-18
Page 3 of 8
The following table describes the surrounding land uses located adjacent to the subject
property:
General Plan Designation Zoning Land Uses
Site Office OP Professional Office Building
North Open Space OS Open Space
South Office OP Church
East N/A N/A SR-57 Freeway
West Low Medium Residential RLM Single-Family Homes
Project Site
Adjacent Properties to the West Adjacent Property to the South
7.2
Packet Pg. 34
5.1.b
Packet Pg. 22
Conditional Use Permit Planning Case No. PL2021-18
Page 4 of 8
Project Description
Innova Biolab was founded in 1998 and has been servicing the healthcare community
throughout the past two decades. The company has approximately 150 employees.
The proposed Diamond Bar facility will provide for the following operations: laboratory
analysis, client services and administration, billing and collections department, logistics
dispatch, human resources and accounting services. Innova’s team of in-house couriers
provide services throughout the state to retrieve specimens from clients. Specimens
are returned back to the lab for processing and results are sent electronically to the
client. After this process is complete, the administration team will bill for the services
rendered through the patients’ commercial and state insurance plans. There will be no
products sold or manufactured, and will only provide services to healthcare
professionals and organizations.
The proposed business hours will be from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m., Monday through Friday,
8 a.m. to 2 p.m. on Saturday, and closed Sunday. Approximately 50 employees will
work at the proposed Diamond Bar office.
Proposed Floor Plan
7.2
Packet Pg. 35
5.1.b
Packet Pg. 23
Conditional Use Permit Planning Case No. PL2021-18
Page 5 of 8
ANALYSIS:
Review Authority (DBMC Section 22.58)
A CUP is required for uses whose effect on the surrounding area cannot be determined
before being analyzed for suitability at a particular location.
When reviewing a CUP, consideration is given to the location, design, configuration,
operational characteristics and potential impacts to determine whether or not the
proposed use will pose a detriment to the public health, safety and welfare. If it can be
found that the proposed use is likely to be compatible with its surroundings, the
Commission may approve the proposed use subject to conditions stipulating the
manner in which the use must be conducted. If the Commission finds that the proposed
use is likely to be detrimental to the general peace, health and general welfare, then it
must deny the request.
When a CUP is approved, it runs with the land and all conditions placed on the CUP are
binding on all successors in interest. In other words, if the owner were to close the
business, a new tenant could locate in the space and operate the same type of
business. The new tenant would be required to comply with the same conditions as the
previous tenant and would not be permitted to expand the business without full review
and approval by the Planning Commission.
Required Parking
The required number of parking spaces for medical laboratory uses is one space per
300 square feet of gross floor area. General office uses requires one space per 400
square feet of gross floor area. The table below provides a summary of the parking
requirements for the office building.
The site provides 167 off-street parking spaces. The parking required for the office uses
within the building is 82. The addition of the medical laboratory use requires 13 spaces.
The total off-street parking requirement for the building would thus be 95 spaces,
leaving a surplus of 72 spaces.
Use Sq. Ft. Parking Ratio Parking
Required
Parking
Provided
General Office (Suite 150) 17,247 1/400 sq. ft. 43
General Office (Suite 100) 15,553 1/400 sq. ft. 39
Proposed Medical Lab
(Suite 100) 3,948 1/300 sq. ft. 13
Total 36,748 95 167
City’s Development Code Parking Requirement
7.2
Packet Pg. 36
5.1.b
Packet Pg. 24
Conditional Use Permit Planning Case No. PL2021-18
Page 6 of 8
Parking Demand
When reviewing parking impacts, various uses and peak business hours for those uses
are taken into consideration. The existing building is vacant but is designated for
general office uses. The peak parking demand for office uses would occur on weekdays
from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Innova Biolab’s business hours will be from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 2 p.m. on Saturday, and closed Sunday.
Based on their business proposal, the business will need a maximum of 50 parking
spaces for 50 employees. Under a parking demand scenario, the proposed use could
conceivably generate less demand. Since 167 parking spaces are available, there
would still be a surplus of 74 spaces under this scenario.
Parking Demand
Use Sq. Ft. Parking Ratio Parking
Required
Parking
Provided
General Office (Suite 150) 17,247 Per Development
Code Requirements 43
Proposed General Office
and Medical Lab
(Suite 100)
19,701 50 employees 50
Total 36,748 93 167
Staff does not foresee any parking issues resulting from the proposed use. The existing
parking supply is adequate and can accommodate the proposed general office and
medical laboratory use.
Compatibility with Neighborhood
The site is surrounded by single-family residences to the west, an open space hillside to
the north, a church to the south and the 57 freeway to the east. The proposed use is
consistent with the current zoning designation of Professional Office. A general office
with medical laboratory is considered a non -intensive use in terms of noise and traffic.
Additionally, no customers will be visiting the site. Given the proposed hours of
operation, the availability of parking, and types of adjoining uses, it is reasonable to
conclude that the proposed business will be compatible with the other uses in the
neighborhood.
Additional Review
The Building and Safety Division reviewed this project and included their comments in
the attached resolution as conditions of approval.
7.2
Packet Pg. 37
5.1.b
Packet Pg. 25
Conditional Use Permit Planning Case No. PL2021-18
Page 7 of 8
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING:
On June 9, 2021, public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 1,000 -
foot radius of the project site. On June 11, 2021, the notice was published in the San
Gabriel Valley Tribune newspaper; the project site was posted with a notice display
board; and a copy of the public notice was posted at the City’s designated community
posting sites.
PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED:
Staff received phone calls from several neighboring residents in response to the public
hearing notice. They expressed health concerns related to the possibility of the
laboratory conducting COVID-19 testing, and that specimens may not be properly
disposed of. The applicant has confirmed that the Diamond Bar location will not be
conducting COVID-19 testing, as their Pomona location provides this service. Typical
specimens will include samples from healthcare industries such as blood work or urine.
Specimens will be properly disposed of from the site three times a week through a
professional waste management company, as the healthcare industry has its own
regulatory requirements specifically for clinical laboratories. The Centers for Medicare
and Medicaid Services regulates all laboratory testing performed on humans in the
nation, through the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA). Laboratories
must pass an inspection annually to ensure they comply with CLIA.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT:
This project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA). Based on that assessment, the City has determined the project to be
Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to the provisions of
Article 19 Section 15301(a) (Interior alterations involving partitions and electrical
conveyances) of the CEQA Guidelines. No further environmental review is required.
PREPARED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
7.2
Packet Pg. 38
5.1.b
Packet Pg. 26
Conditional Use Permit Planning Case No. PL2021-18
Page 8 of 8
Attachments:
A. Draft Resolution No. 2021-XX and Standard Conditions of Approval
B. Site Plan and Floor Plans
C. Business Description
7.2
Packet Pg. 39
5.1.b
Packet Pg. 27
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
NO. PL2021-18, TO OPERATE A MEDICAL LABORATORY USE FOR INNOVA
BIOLAB, A CLINICAL LABORATORY IN A 19,501 SQUARE-FOOT SPACE AT
AN EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING LOCATED AT 3333 DIAMOND CANYON
ROAD, SUITE 100, DIAMOND BAR, CA (APN 8269-011-015).
A. RECITALS
1. Property owner, Teresa Cheung, and applicant, Jordan Wang for Innova
Biolab, have filed an application for Conditional Use Permit No. PL 2021-18
to operate a medical laboratory use for Innova Biolab, a clinical laboratory
in a 19,501 square-foot space at an existing office building. The project site
is more specifically described as 3333 Diamond Canyon Road, Suite 100,
Diamond Bar, Los Angeles County, California. Hereinafter in this resolution,
the subject Conditional Use Permit shall collectively be referred to as the
“Project” or “Proposed Use.”
2. The subject property is comprised of a 3.37 gross acre parcel. It is located
in the Professional Office (OP) zone with a General Plan land use
designation of Office.
3. The Assessor’s Parcel Number is 8269-011-015.
4. On June 11, 2021, notification of the public hearing for this project was
published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune newspaper. On June 9, 2021,
public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 1,000-foot
radius of the Project site and posted at the City’s designated community
posting sites.
5. On June 22, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar
conducted a duly noticed public hearing, solicited testimony from all
interested individuals, and concluded said hearing on that date.
B. RESOLUTION
NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows:
1. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
7.2.a
Packet Pg. 40
5.1.b
Packet Pg. 28
2
PC Resolution No. 2021-XX
2. The Planning Commission hereby determines the Project to be
Categorically Exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to the provisions of Article 19,
Section 15301(a) (Interior alterations involving partitions and electrical
conveyances) of the CEQA Guidelines. Therefore, no further
environmental review is required.
C. FINDINGS OF FACT
Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein and as prescribed under
Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Section 22.58, this Planning Commission
hereby finds and approves as follows:
Conditional Use Permit Review Findings (DBMC Section 22.58)
1. The Proposed Use is allowed within the subject zoning district with the
approval of a conditional use permit and complies with all other applicable
provisions of this Development Code and the Municipal Code.
Pursuant to DBMC Section 22.10.030 Table 2-6, medical services – clinics
and laboratories —as defined by DBMC Section 22.80.020—is permitted in
the OP zoning district with approval of a conditional use permit. The
proposed medical laboratory will be located within an existing office
building.
2. The Proposed Use is consistent with the general plan and any applicable
specific plan.
The Proposed Use is consistent with General Plan Goal LU-G-10: (“Support
the long-term viability of existing commercial, office, and light industrial
uses, designated for continued use in the General Plan”) in that the
Proposed Use will be located within an existing office building that has been
vacant for approximately two years.
The Proposed Use is consistent with General Plan Goal ED-P-6: (“Work
with property owners of existing office centers to increase the daytime
population and facilitate opportunities to attract quality office tenants and
supporting commercial businesses”) in that the Proposed Use will be
operated by a tenant that has been servicing the healthcare community
throughout the past two decades. Their proposed hours from 8 a.m. to
6 p.m., Monday through Friday and 8 a.m. to 2 p.m. on Saturday is
consistent with creating a daytime population.
The Project site is not subject to the provisions of any specific plan.
3. The design, location, size and operating characteristics of the Proposed
Use are compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity.
7.2.a
Packet Pg. 41
5.1.b
Packet Pg. 29
3
PC Resolution No. 2021-XX
The Proposed Use will be located within an existing office building which
will be occupied by similar office uses. The Proposed Use complies with the
City’s Development Code parking requirement as well as parking demand.
The Proposed Use will operate from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m., Monday through
Friday, 8 a.m. to 2 p.m. on Saturday, and closed Sunday .
The site is surrounded by single-family residences to the west, an open
space hillside to the north, church to the south and the 57 freeway to the
east. A general office with medical laboratory is considered a non-intensive
use in terms of noise and traffic. Additionally, no customers will be visiting
the site. Given the proposed hours of operation, the availability of parking,
and types of adjoining uses, it is reasonable to conclude that the pro posed
business will be compatible with the other uses in the neighborhood.
Through compliance with the conditions of approval stipulating the manner
in which the use must be conducted, the Proposed Use will be compatible
with the other uses within the building.
4. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of
use being proposed, including access, provision of utilities, compatibility
with adjoining land uses, and the absence of physical constraints.
The Proposed Use is physically suitable within the subject site because it
will be located in an existing building that operates with general office uses,
and no additional square footage is being proposed. In addition, the
Proposed Use will be using existing access and parking.
5. Granting the conditional use permit will not be detrimental to the public
interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or injurious to persons,
property, or improvements in the vicinity and zoning district in which the
property is located.
Prior to the issuance of any city permits, the Project is required to comply
with all conditions of approval within the attached resolution, and the
Building and Safety Division.
6. The proposed Project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions
of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
The proposed use is categorically exempt from the provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as set forth under Article 19
Section 15301(a) (Interior alterations involving partitions and electrical
conveyances) of the CEQA Guidelines.
7.2.a
Packet Pg. 42
5.1.b
Packet Pg. 30
4
PC Resolution No. 2021-XX
D. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Based upon the findings and conclusion set forth above, the Planning Commission
hereby approves Conditional Use Permit No. PL2021-18 subject to the following
conditions:
1. This approval is for the operation of a medical laboratory use for Innova
Biolab, a clinical laboratory in a 19,501 square-foot space at an existing
office building as described in the application on file with the Planning
Division, the Planning Commission staff report for Conditional Use Permit
No. PL2021-18 dated June 22, 2021, and the Planning Commission
minutes pertaining thereto, hereafter referred to as the “Use.”
2. The Use shall substantially conform to the approved plans as submitted and
approved by the Planning Commission and on file with the Community
Development Department.
3. This Conditional Use Permit shall be valid only for 3333 Diamond Canyon
Road, Suite 100, as depicted on the approved plans on file with the Planning
Division. If the Proposed Use expands into additional tenant spaces, the
approved Conditional Use Permit shall terminate and a new Conditional Use
Permit, subject to Planning Commission approval shall be required for the
new location.
4. If, at any time, the City finds that the Use is the cause of a parking deficiency
or other land use impact, the Community Development Director may refer
the matter back to the Planning Commission to consider amending this
Conditional Use Permit to address such impacts.
5. No changes to the approved scope of services comprising the use shall be
permitted unless the applicant first applies for an amendment to this
Conditional Use Permit, pays all application processing fees and receives
approval from the Planning Commission.
The Planning Commission shall:
(a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and
(b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail
to the property owner, Teresa Cheung, 1142 S. Diamond Bar Blvd
#423, Diamond Bar, CA 91765; and applicant, Jordan Wang for
Innova Biolab, 1977 N. Garey Ave, Pomona, CA 91767.
7.2.a
Packet Pg. 43
5.1.b
Packet Pg. 31
5
PC Resolution No. 2021-XX
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2021, BY THE PLANNING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR.
By: ______________________________________
William Rawlings, Chairperson
I, Greg Gubman, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted, at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of June, 2021, by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners:
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST: ___________________________
Greg Gubman, Secretary
7.2.a
Packet Pg. 44
5.1.b
Packet Pg. 32
6
PC Resolution No. 2021-XX
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
USE PERMITS, COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL
NEW AND REMODELED STRUCTURES
PROJECT #: Conditional Use Permit No. PL2021-18
SUBJECT: To operate a medical laboratory use for Innova Biolab, a
clinical laboratory in a 19,501 square-foot space at an
existing office building
PROPERTY Teresa Cheung
OWNER(S): 1142 S. Diamond Bar Blvd #423
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
APPLICANT: Jordan Wang for Innova Biolab
1977 N. Garey Ave
Pomona, CA 91767
LOCATION: 3333 Diamond Canyon Road, Suite 100, Diamond Bar, CA
91765
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION AT (909) 839-7030, FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
A. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
1. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, and
its officers, agents and employees, from any claim, action, or proceeding
to attack, set-aside, void, or annul the approval of Conditional Use Permit
No. PL2021-18 brought within the time period provided by Government
Code Section 66499.37. In the event the city and/or its officers, agents
and employees are made a party of any such action:
7.2.a
Packet Pg. 45
5.1.b
Packet Pg. 33
7
PC Resolution No. 2021-XX
(a) Applicant shall provide a defense to the City defendants or at the
City's option reimburse the City its costs of defense, including
reasonable attorneys fees, incurred in defense of such claims.
(b) Applicant shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against
the City defendants. The City shall promptly notify the applicant
of any claim, action of proceeding, and shall cooperate fully in the
defense thereof.
2. This approval shall not be effective for any purpose until the applicant
and owner of the property involved have filed, within twenty-one
(21) days of approval of this Conditional Use Permit No. PL 2021-18 at
the City of Diamond Bar Community Development Department, their
affidavit stating that they are aware of and agree to accept all the
conditions of this approval. Further, this approval shall not be effective
until the applicants pay remaining City processing fees.
3. The business owners and all designers, architects, engineers, and
contractors associated with this project shall obtain a Diamon d Bar
Business License for those businesses located in Diamond Bar.
4. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced
thereon, all conditions of approval shall be completed.
5. The project site shall be maintained and operated in full compliance with
the conditions of approval and all laws, or other applicable regulations.
6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of
the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and any
applicable Specific Plan in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
7. To ensure compliance with all conditions of approval and applicable
codes, the Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to periodic review. If
non-compliance with conditions of approval occurs, the P lanning
Commission may review the Conditional Use Permit. The Commission
may revoke or modify the Conditional Use Permit.
8. Property owner/applicant shall remove the public hearing notice board
within three (3) days of this project's approval.
9. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of City Planning,
Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works Department, and the Fire
Department.
7.2.a
Packet Pg. 46
5.1.b
Packet Pg. 34
8
PC Resolution No. 2021-XX
B. FEES/DEPOSITS
1. Applicant shall pay development fees (including but not limited to
Planning, Building and Safety Divisions, and Public Works Department)
at the established rates, prior to issuance of building permits, as required
by the City. School fees as required shall be paid prior to the issuance
of building permit. In addition, the applicant shall pay a ll remaining
prorated City project review and processing fees prior to issuance of
grading or building permit, whichever comes first.
2. Prior to any plan check, all deposit accounts for the processing of this
project shall have no deficits.
C. TIME LIMITS
1. The approval of Conditional Use Permit No. P L2021-18 shall expire
within one (1) year from the date of approval if the use has not been
exercised as defined per DBMC Section 22.66.050 (b)(1). The applicant
may request in writing a one year time extension subject to DBMC
Section 22.60.050(c) for Planning Commission approval.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION,
(909) 839-7020, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. ADA access improvements shall be made where “readily achievable,” such as
the curb ramp at the existing ADA parking space. The curb ramp shall be out
of the parking space with updated signage at the parking stall.
2. No tenant improvements are part of this application. No work shall occur without
obtaining building permits.
3. All medical waste shall be hauled away offsite to an approved facility. No
medical waste or hazardous materials shall be put into the sewer system or
regular trash.
4. All equipment at the facility shall maintain 48” exit routes and if any ventilation
or electrical work is required, building permits shall be obtained prior to
installation.
END
7.2.a
Packet Pg. 47
5.1.b
Packet Pg. 35
EXIST'G
ASPHALT PARKING
LOT & DRIVEWAYS D
IAMOND
CANYON
RDS DIAMOND CANYON RDS OAK VALLEY PL574.62' (LOT)
TOTAL PARKING: 167
PROPOSED AREA OF
WORK ON 1 FLOOR.
SUITE 100
TOTAL SFQT: 19501
G.001.00
SHEET NO.:
CADD LOCATION:
CHECK BY : DC
DRAWN BY : TC
PROJECT NO.:
DATE : FEB 25, 2021SEAL & SIGNATURE:
DRAWING
TITLE:PLOT PLAN & NOTES
PROJECT
LOCATION:3333 S DIAMOND CANYON RD, SUITE
100, DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765
DOB JOB #:
NO.REVISION DATE
CONSULTANT INFORMATION:
OWNER'S INFORMATION:
PROPERTY INFORMATION
TAX LOT
ZONING DISTRICT
1
LCR18000-R
1 OF 2
2LOT 2L#0
5%#L' 2 'Ä1
SCOPE OF WORK
1.INTERIOR RENOVATION ON PARTIAL 1ST FLOOR, 2 STORIES BRICK BUILDING.
2.NO CHANGE IN USE, MEANS OF EGRESS OR OCCUPANCY IN THIS APPLICATION.
EXIT SIGNS & LIGHTING NOTES:
1.EXIT SIGNS SHALL BE OF THE INTERNALLY LIGHTED, IN ALL ASSEMBLY SPACES WHERE THE
GENERAL ILLUMINATION IS REDUCED TO LESS THAN 5 FOOT CANDLES DURING OCCUPANCY
C26-801.17.
2.ALL BATTERY PACKS AND LIGHT ALARMS TO BE 12 VOLTS WITH 25 WATT LAMP. COMPLY WIH
MEMO 2/19/81.
3.CORRIDORS AND EXITS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH ARTIFICIAL LIGHTING FACILITIES.
ILLUMINATION OF AT LEAST TWO FOOT CANDLES MEASURED AT THE FLOOR LEVEL SHALL BE
MAINTAINEDD CONTINUOUSLY, DURING OCCUPANCY, IN EXITS AND THEIR ACCESS FACILITIES
4.THE ARTIFICIAL LIGHT SOURCE ON EXTERNALLY LIGHTED SIGNS SHALL PROVIDE A RED LIGHT,
EITHER BY THE USE OF AN INCANDESCENT COLORED BULB OR OTHER VISIBLE RED LIGHT
SOURCE, SO AS TO PROVIDE AT LEAST TWENTY-FIVE FOOT CANDLES ON THE EXPOSED FACE OF
THE SIGN.
GENERAL NOTES:
1.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE FINISHED FACE OF WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
2.THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE A COMPETENT SUPERINTENDENT ON THE
PREMISES AT ALL TIMES WHEN THE WORK IS IN PROGRESS.
3.GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH BUILDING'S FACILITIES
DEPARTMENT, TELEPHONE COMPANY, AND VARIOUS VENDORS DURING
CONSTRUCTION AND PHASING PROCESS.
4.ALL WORK SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE NYC BUILDING CODES AND ALL
APPLICABLE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF AUTHORITIES UNDER EACH JURISDICTION.
5.ALL PLUMBING AND ELECTRICAL WORK TO BE DONE BY TRADESMEN LICENSED IN THE
JURISDICTION WHO WILL OBTAIN REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AND SIGN-OFFS.
6.THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD
PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK AND SHALL REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN
DRAWINGS AND FIELD CONDITIONS TO THE ARCHITECT. WORK DONE AFTER THE
DISCOVERY OF DISCREPANCIES AND PRIOR TO THE RECEIPT OF WRITTEN APPROVAL
FOR CORRECTION BY THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE AT CONTRACTOR'S RISK. NO
ADDITIONAL COST WILL BE ADDED TO THE PROJECT DUE TO THE CONTRACTOR'S
OVERSIGHT IN VERIFICATION OF EXISTING CONDITIONS.
7.MINOR DETAILS NOT USUALLY SHOWN OR SPECIFIED, BUT NECESSARY FOR PROPER
CONSTRUCTION OF ANY PART OF THE WORK SHALL BE INCLUDED AS IF THEY WERE
INCLUDED ON THE DRAWINGS.
8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROTECTION OF ALL EXISTING
CONDITIONS AND MATERIALS WITHIN THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AREA. THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL DESIGN AND INSTALL ADEQUATE BRACING AND SHORING FOR
ALL STRUCTURALLY RELATED WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE SOLE
RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DAMAGE OR INJURIES CAUSED BY OR DURING THE
EXECUTION OF THE WORK.
9.CHASING OR CUTTING EXISTING CORE OR EXTERIOR WALL IS NOT PERMITTED.
10.THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL LAY-OUT HIS OWN WORK AND SHALL PROVIDE
ALL DIMENSIONS REQUIRED FOR ALL TRADES.
11.THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL DO ALL CUTTING, PATCHING, REPAIRING AS
REQUIRED TO PERFORM ALL THE WORK INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS, AND ALL
OTHER WORK THAT MAY BE REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE JOB.
12.ALL WIRING SHALL BE REMOVED TO A POINT OF CONCEALMENT AND SHALL BE
PROPERLY CAPPED OR PLUGGED.
13.THE ENGINEER/ARCHITECT OF RECORD SHALL BE NOTIFIED FOR ANY INSPECTIONS.
14.THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN INSURANCE COVERAGE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE BUILDING OWNER'S REQUIREMENTS.
15.ASBESTOS: SHOULD ANY ASBESTOS OR ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL (A.C.M.) BE
UNCOVERED, IT SHOULD BE REPORTED IMMEDIATELY TO THE OWNER & ARCHITECT.
THESE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS DO NOT INCLUDE THE REMOVAL OF ANY ASBESTOS OR
A.C.M.
16.NO CUTTING OR CHANNELING INTO EXISTING BUILDING STRUCTURE.
17.BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, CONTRACTOR SHALL FILE ALL NECESSARY
CERTIFICATES OF INSURANCE AND FAMILIARIZE HIMSELF WITH THE BUILDING RULES
AND REGULATIONS.
18.CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE TO LOCATE ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND
CLEARLY MARK THEM PRIOR TO EXCAVATION AS REQUIRED BY GOVERNING AGENCIES
AND TAKE ALL NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO PROTECT THESE UTILITIES FROM
DAMAGES OR DESTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR ALSO RESPONSIBLE TO PROTECT ALL
ADJOINING PROPERTIES BOTH PUBLIC & PRIVATE AND TAKE ALL SAFETY PRECAUTIONS
TO PROTECT THE HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE IMMEDIATE AREA.
BUILDING DEPARTMENT NOTES:
1.ALL DOORS TO BE INCOMBUSTIBLE.
2.DUCTS, PIPES AND CONDUITS PASSING THROUGH RATED CONSTRUCTION SHALL
COMPLY WITH SECTION 27-343 OF THE BUILDING CODE.
3.ALL WOOD TO BE FIRE-PROOF AS PER SECTION 27-328, RS 5-3 AND 5-5 OF THE
BUILDING CODE L.L. 76
4.ALL MATERIALS, ASSEMBLIES, FORMS AND METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION AND
SERVICE EQUIPMENT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENT OF SECTION 27-131 OF
THE BUILDING CODE.
5.NO MATERIAL OF ANY MANUFACTURE OR PRODUCER SHALL BE ACCEPTABLE FOR USE
INTENDED UNLESS AND UNTIL THE MATERIAL HAS BEEN TESTED FOR COMPLIANCE
WITH LOCAL CODE REQUIREMENTS.
TENANT PROTECTION PLAN CODE AS PER 28-104.8.4:
BUILDING CONTAINING 1 STORE THAT WILL BE OCCUPIED & 1 STORE THAT WILL NOT BE
OCCUPIED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL INDICATE THAT THE MEANS AND METHODS TO BE
EMPLOYED TO SAFEGUARD THE SAFETY AND HEALTH OF THE OCCUPANTS, INCLUDING,
WHERE APPLICABLE, DETAILS SUCH AS TEMPORARY FIRE-RATED ASSEMBLIES, OPENING
PROTECTIVES, OR DUST CONTAINMENT PROCEDURES. THE ELEMENTS IF THE TENANT
PROTECTION PLAN MAY VARY DEPENDING ON THE NATURE AND SCOPE OF THE WORK BUT A
MINIMUM SHALL MAKE DETAILED AND SPECIFIC PROVISIONS FOR:
1.EGRESS: AT ALL TIMES IN THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION PROVISION SHALL BE MADE
FOR ADEQUATE EGRESS AS REQUIRED BY THIS CODE AND THE TENANT PROTECTION
PLAN SHALL IDENTIFY THE EGRESS THAT WILL BE PROVIDED. REQUIRED EGRESS
SHALL BE MAINTAINED CLEAR AND FREE OF ALL OBSTRUCTIONS, SUCH BUILDING
MATERIALS, TOOLS, ETC. EXCEPT WHERE APPROVED BY THE COMMISSIONER.
2.FIRE SAFETY: ALL NECCESSARY LAWS AND CONTROLS, INCLUDING THOSE WITH
RESPECT TO OCCUPIED DWELLINGS, AS WELL AS ADDITIONAL SAFETY MEASURES
NECESSITATED BY THE CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE STRICTLY OBSERVED.
3.HEALTH REQUIREMENTS: SPECIFICATION OF METHODS TO BE USED FOR CONTROL OF
DUST, DISPOSAL OF CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS, PEST CONTROL AND MAINTENANCE OF
SANITARY FACILITIES SHALL BE INCLUDED.
4.CONTRACTOR MUST COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE LAWS RELATING TO LEAD AND
ASBESTOS. IF OBSERVED IMMEDIATELY CONTACT OWNER OR ARCHITECT.
5.ELECTRIC, GAS, OR OTHER UTILITIES ARE NOT TO BE INTERUPTED.
6.BUILDING SECURITY TO BE MAINTAINED TO PREVENT UNAUTHORIZED PERSONS FROM
ENTERING THE BUILDING.
7.FLOOR SHALL NOT BE OVERLOADED BEYOND WHAT PERMITTED.
8.NO STRUCTURAL WORK SHALL BE DONE THAT MAY ENDANGER THE OCCUPANTS.
9.NOISE RESTRICTION: WHERE HOURS OF THE DAY OR THE DAYS OF THE WEEK IN WHICH
CONSTRUCTION WORK MAY BE UNDERTAKEN ARE LIMITED PURSUANT TO THE NEW
YORK CITY NOISE CONTROL CODE.
10.THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NY CITY HOUSING MAINTENANCE CODE AND MD SHALL BE
STRICTLY OBSERVED.
SPECIAL/PROGRESS INSPECTION ITEMS:
1.MECHANICAL SYSTEMS : BC 1704.16
2.FIRE-RESISTANT PENETRATIONS AND JOINTS : BC 1704.27
3.ENERGY CODE COMPLIANCE INSPECTIONS : BC 110.3.5
4.FINAL
ENERGY CODE PROGRESS INSPECTION ITEMS:
1.INTERIOR LIGHTING POWER
2.LIGHTING CONTROLS
DRYWALL NOTES
1.GYPSUM WALL BOARD SHALL BE U.L. RATED FOR FIRE RESISTANCE AND CONSTRUCTED PER
ASTM C-36, TYPE III, CLASS I, STYLE 3, TAPER-EDGED AND OF THE GRADE AND FORM
HEREINAFTER SPECIFIED.
2.STUDS SHALL BE 22 GAUGE METAL STUDS, CHANNEL-SHAPED HAVING NOT LESS THAN 1-1/4
INCH WIDE FLANGES.
3.STUD TRACKS SHALL BE 25 GAGE METAL CHANNEL-SHAPED SIZED TO RECEIVE THE METAL
STUDS, IN NOT LESS THAN 10 FT LENGTHS
4.INSULATION SHALL BE AN EFFECTIVE NOISE BARRIER, R-11, 3-1/2" THICK AND IT SHALL
COMPLY WITH ASTMC655,TYPE 1 AND ASTME199.
5.ATTACH STUD TRACK TO BUILDING CEILING/ROOF BY R.E. APPROVED METHODS. ATTACH STUD
TRACK TO FLOOR WITH POWER ACTUATED ANCHORS SPACED 24" CENTER TO CENTER. RUN
TRACK CONTINUOUS WALL TO WALL.
6.INSTALL METAL STUDS AS PER PROJECT DRAWINGS AND ATTACH TO TRACK WITH TWO - #8
PHILIPS PANHEAS ATSM SCREWS.
7.INSTALL INSULATION ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. INSULATION NEED
ONLY BE INSTALLED IN WALL BETWEEN E/G ROOM AND EQUIPMENT ROOM, AND AS SHOWN ON
THE DRAWINGS.
8.INSTALL GYPSUM WALL BOARD, AS PER PROJECT DRAWINGS. THE FIRST LAYER SHALL BE
ATTACHED WITH 1"-LONG #6 BUGLE HEAD STUDS. THE SECOND LAYER SHALL BE APPLIED
WITH VERTICAL JOINTS OFFSET. SPACE ONE STUD FROM FIRST LAYER USING 1-5/8" LONG #6
BUGLE HEAD PHILIPS STEEL SCREWS PACED 9" ON CENTER ALONG VERTICAL JOINTS 12" ON
CENTER AT INTERMEDIATE STUDS AND 24" ON CENTER ALONG TOP AND BOTTOM TRACKS.
TRIM SHALL BE PLACED, ON EDGES AT CEILING AND METAL CORNER/CASING BEADS AT
WALLS (BOTH SIDES). COVE BASE SHALL BE INSTALLED ON BOTH SIDES OF THE WALL AT THE
FLOOR.
9.THE SPACE BETWEEN THE ENDS OF THE GYPSUM WALL AND THE METAL WALLS, AND ABOVE
THE FLOORS SHALL BE CAULKED
742 68th street,
Brooklyn, NY 11220
Danny Chen P.E.
D&E BUILD
EVERGREEN INC.
0OT'
#LL +&'#5 &'5+)05 #44#0)'/'0T5 #0& 2L#05
+0&+%#T'& O4 4'24'5'0T'& $; T*+5 &4#9+0)5
#4' O90'& $; #0& T*' 24O2'4T; O( & ' $7+L&
'8'4)4''0 +0%.. 0O0' O( 57%* +&'#5 &'5+)05
#44#0)'/'0T5 O4 2L#05 5*#LL $' 75'& $; O4
&+5%LO5'& TO #0; 2'45O0 (+4/ O4
%O42O4#T+O0 (O4 #0; 2742O5' 9*#T5O'8'4
9+T*O7T T*' 94+TT'0 2'4/+55+O0 O( & '
$7+L& '8'4)4''0 +0%. 94+TT'0 &+/'05+O05 O0
T*'5' &4#9+0)5 5*#LL *#8' 24'%'&'0%'
O8'4 5%#L'& &+/'05+O05. %O0T4#%TO45 5*#LL
*#8' 8'4+(; #0& $' 4'52O05+$L' (O4 #LL
&+/'05+O05 #0& %O0&+T+O05 O0 T*' ,O$ #0&
& ' $7+L& '8'4)4''0 +0%. /75T $' 0OT+(+'&
O( #0; &+5%4'2#0%; (4O/ T*' &+/'05+O05 #0&
%O0&+T+O05 5*O90 $; T*+5 &4#9+0)5.
7.2.b
Packet Pg. 48
5.1.b
Packet Pg. 36
7.2.bPacket Pg. 495.1.bPacket Pg. 37
EXIST'G
RESTROOM
EXIST'G
RESTROOM
15'-6"10'-6"
12'-10"11'-8"11'-9"6'-4"3'-9"17'-2"19'-9"11'-6"16'-1"10'-8"11'-5"10'-7"11'-2"14'-6"14'-5"21'-10"23'-10"46'-11"14'-7"25'-8"
21'-1"21'-5"12'-7"11'-7"11'-7"11'-7"9'-8"69'-8"25'-3"
117'-11"
11'-6"11'-10"35'-9"27'-6"40'-4"11'-9"9'-7"6'-1"9'-10"11'-0"10'-11"10'-2"10'-0"8'-8"11'-0"
5'-0"7'-2"18'-11"9'-7"15'-9"
9'-7"
11'-5"
20'-9"24'-5"23'-3"12'-1"9'-7"16'-9"9'-4"15'-0"
11'-7"11'-7"11'-7"11'-7"11'-3"10'-1" SUITE 100
TOTAL SFQT: 19501
OFFICE SQFT: 10290
LAB: 3948
G.001.00
SHEET NO.:
CADD LOCATION:
CHECK BY : DC
DRAWN BY : TC
PROJECT NO.:
DATE : FEB 25, 2021SEAL & SIGNATURE:
DRAWING
TITLE:
PROJECT
LOCATION:
DOB JOB #:
NO.REVISION DATE
CONSULTANT INFORMATION:
OWNER'S INFORMATION:
NOTE:
ALL IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS
INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWINGS
ARE OWNED BY AND THE PROPERTY OF D&E BUILD
EVERGREEN INC.. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS, DESIGNS,
ARRANGEMENTS OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY OR
DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON, FIRM OR
CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER
WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF D&E
BUILD EVERGREEN INC. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ON
THESE DRAWINGS SHALL HAVE PRECEDENCE
OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS. CONTRACTORS SHALL
HAVE VERIFY AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL
DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS ON THE JOB, AND
D&E BUILD EVERGREEN INC. MUST BE NOTIFIED
OF ANY DISCREPANCY FROM THE DIMENSIONS AND
CONDITIONS SHOWN BY THIS DRAWINGS.
PARTIAL 1ST FL. PLAN - SUITE 100
PROPERTY INFORMATION
TAX LOT
ZONING DISTRICT
1
LCR18000-R
742 68th street,
Brooklyn, NY 11220
Danny Chen P.E.
D&E BUILD
EVERGREEN INC.
3333 S DIAMOND CANYON RD, SUITE
100, DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765
1 PARTIAL 1ST FLOOR PLAN - SUITE 100
SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"
7.2.b
Packet Pg. 50
5.1.b
Packet Pg. 38
LABSTORAGEBREAKROOM
CLIENT SERVICES ADMIN
BILLING ADMIN
OFFICEOFFICEACCOUNTING
OFFICE OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICE
CONF ROOM
RECEPTION/LOBBY
CUBICLES
OFFICE
RESTROOMS
ELEC RM
LAB
SMALL
CONF
AREA
BUTLERS PANTRY
ELEC RMIT RM
CREATIVE WORKSPACE
LOGISTICS
7.2.b
Packet Pg. 51
5.1.b
Packet Pg. 39
Biological Laboratory, Inc.
1977 N Garey Ave.
Pomona, California 91767
T 909.718.4592
F 909.469.6718
www.biolaboratory.net
3/9/2021
City of Diamond Bar
RE: INNOVA BIOLAB Business Description
To whom it may concern,
Thank you for taking the time to review our business and we hope to be a good fit for the City of Diamond Bar.
INNOVA BIOLAB was founded in 1998 and has been servicing the healthcare community throughout the past 2
decades. IBL is a CLIA certified, AAB proficiency recognized and HIPPA compliant facility.
Our clinical laboratory consists of primarily general office use and analytical instrumentation for analysis.
There are no toxic chemicals that will present any type of harm to the environment, any waste is picked up by
professional waste management companies. Our departments include laboratory analysis, client services &
administration, billing & collections department, logistics dispatch, human resources and accounting services.
There are no products sold or manufactured, we only provide a service to healthcare professionals and
organizations.
We have a team of in-house couriers that drive throughout the state and pick up from our clients. Once the
specimens are picked up from our clients they return back to the lab for processing and results are then
produced for the clients and sent out electronically. After this process the administration team will begin to
bill for the services rendered through patients commercial and state insurance plans. The business hours are
8AM to 6PM Monday through Friday, Saturday 8AM to 2PM and closed Sundays. We have a total of 150
employees (not all based at this location, only about a third will be at this location) and believe this transition
will be beneficial for both our operations and for the local economy . Please let me know if there are further
questions.
Sincerely,
Biological Laboratory, Inc
7.2.c
Packet Pg. 52
5.1.b
Packet Pg. 40
MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
DIAMOND BAR CITY HALL WINDMILL COMMUNITY ROOM
21810 COPLEY DRIVE, DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765
JUNE 22, 2021
CALL TO ORDER:
Chair/Rawlings called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Commissioner Mok led the Pledge of Allegiance.
1. ROLL CALL: Commissioners: Naila Barlas, Kenneth Mok, Raymond
Wolfe, Vice Chairman Mahendra Garg, Chairman William
Rawlings.
Staff Present : Greg Gubman, Community Development Director; James
Eggart, Assistant City Attorney; Grace Lee, Senior Planner; Mayuko (May) Nakajima,
Associate Planner; Joy Tsai, Assistant Planner; Kristina Santana, City Clerk; Stella Marquez,
Administrative Coordinator.
2. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: None Offered.
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: As presented
4. CONSENT CALENDAR:
4.1 Minutes of the Regular Planning Commission Meeting of June 8,
2021.
C/Mok moved, VC/Garg seconded, to approve Consent Calendar as
presented. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Barlas, Mok, Wolfe, VC/Garg,
Chair/Rawlings
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None
5. OLD BUSINESS: None
6. NEW BUSINESS: None
7. PUBLIC HEARING(S):
7.1 Conditional Use Permit Planning Case No. PL2021-19 – Under the authority
of Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.58, the applicant requested
Conditional Use Permit approval to operate a fitness studio in a 3,966 square foot
5.1.c
Packet Pg. 41
________________________________________________________________________
JUNE 22, 2021 PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION
________________________________________________________________________
lease space located at Golden Springs Plaza. The subject property is zoned
Regional Commercial (C-3) with an underlying General Plan land use designation
of General Commercial.
PROJECT ADDRESS: 20657 Golden Springs Drive, Suite 111A
Diamond Bar, CA 91789
APPLICANT: Steve Lee
3935 Landmark Lane
Brea, CA 92823
PROPERTY OWNER: Golden Springs Asset LLC
20657 Golden Springs Drive, Suite 201
Diamond Bar, CA 91789
AP/Tsai presented staff’s report and recommended Planning Commission
approval of Conditional Use Permit Planning Case No. PL2021 -19, based on the
Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the
resolution.
VC/Garg asked if there was only one entrance to the building and AP/Tsai
explained that there is one entrance to the unit and a rear exit point in case of
emergency that also provides access to the shared restroom facilities. VC/Garg
asked how many sessions would be conducted during the day and AP/Tsai
directed VC/Garg to the applicant for a response. VC/Garg questioned whether
the number of allocated parking spaces was sufficient. CDD/Gubman explained
there are 243 non-exclusive parking spaces available on an aggregate basis that
can be used by any patron of the property.
C/Mok asked how many units are vacant in the center, and AP/Tsai said she did
not have that information but was told by the landlord that they are having trouble
leasing out bigger spaces and that other tenants have left due to the pandemic.
Chair/Rawlings opened public comments.
Steve Lee, applicant, stated that 24 parking slots should not be a problem
because one trainer works with a single patron for about an hour who leaves
when another arrives.
C/Mok asked if Mr. Lee outgrew the Walnut facility and plans to relocate to a
larger facility in Diamond Bar. Mr. Lee explained that his business was in
Diamond Bar six years ago and when the rent increased, he moved to a smaller
facility in Walnut. Now the trainers want a larger facility which caused him to
return to Diamond Bar.
5.1.c
Packet Pg. 42
________________________________________________________________________
JUNE 22, 2021 PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION
________________________________________________________________________
C/Barlas asked how many trainers and employees would be at the location at
any given time and Mr. Lee responded five to six.
Chair/Rawlings closed public comments.
C/Wolfe said he appreciates businesses wishing to relocate in the City but is
concerned about the noise level affecting adjacent businesses and stated that
according to his research, 88 decibels for 45 minutes is a maximum amount of
noise level. He suggested this item be sent back to staff to determine an
acceptable interior noise level to make sure there is no spillover noise that would
adversely impact adjoining businesses.
Following discussion, C/Wolfe moved, C/Mok seconded, to reopen the public
hearing and continue the public hearing to July 13th to allow staff to establish an
acceptable noise level threshold for these types of establishments so as not to
disrupt adjoining businesses. Motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Barlas, Mok, Wolfe, Chair/Rawlings
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: VC/Garg
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None
7.2 Conditional Use Permit Planning Case No. PL2021-18 – Under the
authority of Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.58, the applicant requested
Conditional Use Permit approval to operate a medical laboratory use for Innova
Biolab, a clinical laboratory, in a 19,501 square foot space at an existing 36,748
square foot office building on a 3.37 acre (143,748 square foot) site. The subject
property is zoned Professional Office (OP) with an underlying General Plan land
use designation of Office.
PROJECT ADDRESS: 3333 Diamond Canyon Road, Suite 100
Diamond Bar, CA 91789
APPLICANT: Teresa Cheung
1142 S. Diamond Bar Boulevard #423
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
PROPERTY OWNER: Jordan Wang for Innova Biolab
1977 N. Garey Avenue
Pomona, CA 91767
AP/Nakajima presented staff’s report and recommended Planning Commission
approval of Conditional Use Permit Planning Case No. PL2021-18, based on the
5.1.c
Packet Pg. 43
________________________________________________________________________
JUNE 22, 2021 PAGE 4 PLANNING COMMISSION
________________________________________________________________________
Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the
resolution. It was added that should the Commission approve this conditional use
permit, staff recommends the addition of the following condition of approval:
“The applicant shall at all times comply with the requirements of the agencies
responsible for licensing and regulating clinical laboratories, includ ing the Food
and Drug Administration, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.”
With this added condition, staff believes it should cover the types of testing and
hazardous waste handling. If they violate any rules as defined by the FDC, CMS
or CDC, the Planning Commission has the authority to revoke the CUP.
AP/Nakajima stated that additionally, staff is recommending an amendment to
Condition #1 which mentions the company name (Innova Biolab), which s hould
be removed since the CUP runs with the land use, and not a specific business
entity, and further recommends the addition of language to specify the limits to
the scope of the proposed use:
“This approval is for the operation of a 4,000 square -foot, Biosafety Level 2
(BSL-2) medical laboratory use within a 19,501 square-foot space at an existing
office building as described in the application on file with the Planning Division,
the Planning Commission staff report for Conditional Use Permit No. PL2021-18
dated June 22, 2021, and the Planning Commission minutes pertaining thereto,
hereafter referred to as the “Use.”
Chair/Rawlings referred to a CDC document that indicated “those types of
facilities would be limited to bacteria virus that cause mild disease to humans or
are difficult to contract near aerosol in a lab setting” and asked if that was correct.
AP/Nakajima responded that the information she received from the CDC website
that stated “it covers labels that work with agents associated with human
diseases, pathogenic or infections, organisms that pose a moderate health
hazard. Examples include viruses such as the HIV virus”. She further stated that
any changes to the proposed use or the floorplan would require another public
hearing before the Planning Commission to amend the CUP.
Chair/Rawlings asked for response to whether a BSL 2 requires that any
procedures that may lead to squashing or potential aerosol of material would be
limited to an area that has a biological safety cabinet and that the BSL Level 2
requires that (the biolab) decontaminate work surfaces at least daily and that the
waste materials are decontaminated prior to disposal. AP/Nakajima said it was
her understanding during discussions with the applicant that waste would be
decontaminated prior to disposal.
5.1.c
Packet Pg. 44
________________________________________________________________________
JUNE 22, 2021 PAGE 5 PLANNING COMMISSION
________________________________________________________________________
C/Mok said that from his reading the testimonies from emails and documents, the
major concern was that the testing was going to be done on SARS or COVID-19.
If the biolab is operating at BSL Level 2, is there a law or medical condition tha t
says it cannot test COVID-19, SARS or any other high-risk specimen of that
caliber and AP/Nakajima responded that according to the CDC website, routine
diagnostic testing of COVID-19 is available for BSL Level 2 laboratories. An
option would be for the Commission to include a condition limiting or prohibiting
COVID-19 at the site, if it wished to do so. C/Mok asked what would prevent this
or any lab from testing COVID-19 on the sly and if protocol were broken, who
would enforce it and would there be regular inspections or a watchdog
organization ensuring those kinds of tests were not being performed.
AP/Nakajima responded that it would be enforced by the FDA, CMS and CDC.
She was not certain about the frequency of inspections, but her understanding is
that there are several inspections the biolab would need to pass. C/Mok referred
to Attachment D (Suite 100) of the floorplan and said he noticed that the two labs
are in the open when almost all of the other work areas are behind closed doors
which to him is both promising and problematic – promising because the
operators of the lab must feel that what they are testing is safe enough to be do ne
in the open and problematic, because something could happen in the open and
not behind closed doors that could be catastrophic.
C/Barlas said that if BSL Level 2 wants to do COVID testing, they have to be at
BSL Level 2 enhanced or 2.5 which requires certification from the Institute of the
Viral Safety Committee. She asked to have the applicant comment on this
statement.
Chair/Rawlings opened the public hearing.
Jordan Wang stated that Biolab was acquired by Innova in December 2020 and
prior to that, the lab was located on Valley Vista in Diamond Bar for about six
years after which the lab moved to Pomona where a drive -through was located.
He understands the concerns about Level 2, but during the COVID pandemic,
the lab tested about two million patients and not one lab tech or testing staff
contracted COVID. On the outside of the lab, there is indication day to day that
COVID at the lab is present through a swab with no particles flying through the
air or contaminating the environment. The positive about having the Innova lab
in Diamond Bar is that the staff is routinely (weekly) tested and will continue to
wear masks until at least 2022.
Mr. Wang responded to Chair/Rawlings that all of the bio safety cabinets are
certified CEPA regulated.
5.1.c
Packet Pg. 45
________________________________________________________________________
JUNE 22, 2021 PAGE 6 PLANNING COMMISSION
________________________________________________________________________
Mr. Wang responded to C/Barlas’s question that Innova is a Bio Level Safety 2,
a high complexity laboratory. COVID testing is a swab in a tube which is handled
and processed accordingly.
Mr. Wang confirmed to Chair/Rawlings that at the end of every shift, countertops
are bleached down and surfaces are mopped on a daily basis. BLS 2 is limited
to non-aerosol virus bacteria and while the public fears are reasonable, this is a
clinical lab and not an FDA research lab which would require a Bio Safety Level
4 with much more sophisticated equipment and facility enhancements.
C/Wolfe asked what steps have to be undertaken to increase the lab facilities in
addition to the physical improvements. Mr. Wang responded that the lab is not
equipped nor at the level to do FDA virus testings which are regulated by the
CDC, FDA, etc.
C/Mok asked Mr. Wang if the Commission approved this project under the
condition that Innova would not try to move the lab from a Level 2 to a Level 3,
and not include the testing of high-risk pathogens, specimens (SARS and
COVID-19) if the applicant would agree to that condition. Mr. Wang said that if
the lab followed the guidelines of the state and government, they would
technically be okay to do such testing, but if they were required to agree to such
a condition in order to move back to Diamond Bar, they would do so.
C/Barlas asked the applicant how many certified lab scientists would be working
at the same time in the lab and Mr. Wang responded six to seven. C/Barlas
asked how many were certified biologists and Mr. Wang responded two and the
rest are general or microbiologists. In addition, the lab has a bio-analyst on staff
and employs two consultants. Mr. Wang confirmed that the lab is at BSL Level 2
and will verify whether the lab is at an enhanced level. He offered the
Commissioners copies of the lab’s state license which he had in hand.
The following speakers submitted written comments and/or spoke in
opposition to Conditional Use Permit No. PL2021-18. Speaker indicated
with an asterisk spoke telephonically.
Wendy Tian
Jay Parsons, on behalf of the Diamond Canyon Homeowner’s Association
Michael Tian
Brian Tsai
Changming Qiu
Michelle Chen
Michelle Wu
David Chang
Yinting Qiu
5.1.c
Packet Pg. 46
________________________________________________________________________
JUNE 22, 2021 PAGE 7 PLANNING COMMISSION
________________________________________________________________________
Jasmine Hsu
David Wang
Michelle (Huai-Chien) Lo
Lee Pai
An Ching
*Jason Tien (not opposed to lab, but opposed to it being located as proposed)
*Zienghei Chai
No one spoke in favor of Conditional Use Permit No. PL2021-18.
Mr. Wang responded to speakers and Commissioner’s questions and concerns
and there being no other individuals wishing to speak, Chair/Rawlings closed the
public hearing.
C/Wolfe thanked the community for their participation. After extensive review of
the staff report and documents, it is his belief that this is not an appropriate or
compatible use for this particular location. The community is locked in and the
only access point is coming through in front of the building . The homes are
immediately adjacent to the facility and, he does not see that there is a lot of
control over the future proposed use of the facility.
C/Mok stated that the timing of this CUP is not good. This community and the
planet is hurting because of COVID and despite all of the improved conditions
regarding COVID and the lifted restrictions, there remains an open wound from
which people have not yet healed. Certain negative items stand out to him such
as, the most recent June 10th FDA warning to the parent company.
Unfortunately, the parent company messed up and others are paying for that
error. Secondly, there is incompatibility with the neighborhood, as indicated by
C/Wolfe. Third, he feels there is a potential that the BSL Level 2 could possibly
be upgraded to a BSL Level 3 in the future.
C/Barlas said she appreciated the community’s input and the Commissioners
vigilance. She is not that concerned about the bio-hazard risks because as a
biologist, she knows that California is one of the more fo rward states in the
country that has higher standards for the bio-labs and for the collection points.
While there is no precaution taken at that collection center, it has been properly
overseen by the oversight agencies and she is comfortable movin g forward with
the approval and, in fact, there is already a lab which is much closer to other
businesses and residential homes in Diamond Bar.
VC/Garg thanked the community for their participation and said he agreed with
Commissioners Mok and Wolfe about a possible upgrade of the lab to level 3 and
the concern about the business being located adjacent to residential dwellings.
5.1.c
Packet Pg. 47
________________________________________________________________________
JUNE 22, 2021 PAGE 8 PLANNING COMMISSION
________________________________________________________________________
Chair/Rawlings said that like C/Barlas he would be less concerned with the risk
of contagions if the City was able to place additional conditions on the operation
and the facility that would limit it to a Level 2 without COVID testing , but was
somewhat concerned about the single entry/exit neighborhood adjacent to the
business.
C/Wolfe moved, C/Mok seconded, to direct staff to prepare a resolution of denial
for Conditional Use Permit Planning Case No. PL2021 -18 to be brought back to
the Commission for consideration at the July 13th, 2021, meeting with finding that
Findings #3 and #5, that the operating characteristics and proposed uses are not
compatible with public safety and existing and future land uses in the community.
Motion carried 3-2 by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Mok, Wolfe, VC/Garg
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Barlas, Chair/Rawlings
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None
Chair/Rawlings said he was grateful for the public’s participation and
contributions to the City.
8. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
C/Mok expressed his gratitude to the community for their participation and was grateful
for the research and information provided by staff and commun ity members. He thanked
Jordan Wang for his participation and wished him good luck finding another facility.
C/Barlas thanked the community for their participation and staff for a great job on the
proposal and documentation.
VC/Garg thanked community members for their participation and said he would not be
available for the July 13th meeting.
Chair/Rawlings said he hoped Jordan Wang would look to continue doing business in
Diamond Bar and find a good spot for his business in the City.
9. STAFF COMMENTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
CDD/Gubman asked the City Attorney to provide clarification on the next steps with the
action the Commission is taking on the Conditional Use Permit denial.
5.1.c
Packet Pg. 48
________________________________________________________________________
JUNE 22, 2021 PAGE 9 PLANNING COMMISSION
________________________________________________________________________
ACA/Eggart explained that the reason this item has to come back to the Commission
for another meeting is that the Commission’s procedures and the law require any
decision of the Commission to be in writing and state the Findings and the Facts
supporting the decision. Tonight, the Planning Commission did not have a Resolution
citing facts supporting their decision to deny the CUP because staff’s recommendation
was for approval of the CUP and the written document denying the CUP has to come
back for approval at the next meeting to comply with the law. At that time, there will n ot
be a public hearing and no public comments will be received from the applicant and/or
the public. Until that time, the Commission’s action is not final and once it is final, if
approved, the applicant will have an opportunity to appeal the final decisi on to the City
Council after Commission action on July 13th, should the applicant choose to do so.
CDD/Gubman wished everyone a happy and festive 4th of July. The agenda for the next
meeting on July 13th includes a Conditional Use Permit for a veterinary office at the
former Whole Enchilada location in the Walmart/Crunch Fitness Center, a small cell
wireless Ordinance that provides an update on regulations for small cellular facilities, a
Public Hearing for a two-lot subdivision for the United Church of Christ Campus for the
contiguous vacant portion that will, if approved, be able to accommodate residential
units, further consideration of the Fitness 100 Conditional Use Permit with noise levels
reflected in the Conditions of Approval and, the Resolution of Denial for Conditional Use
Permit Planning Case No. PL2021-18.
10. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS:
As listed in the agenda.
ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Planning Commission,
Chair/Rawlings adjourned the regular meeting at 9:08 p.m.
The foregoing minutes are hereby approved this July 13, 2021.
Attest:
Respectfully Submitted,
_______________________________________
Greg Gubman, Community Development Director
______________________________
William Rawlings, Chairperson
5.1.c
Packet Pg. 49
PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 7.1
MEETING DATE: July 27, 2021
CASE/FILE NUMBER: Conditional Use Permit Planning Case No.
PL2021-19
PROJECT LOCATION:
20657 Golden Springs Drive, Suite 111A
Diamond Bar, CA 91789
(APN 8763-007-022)
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial (C)
ZONING DISTRICT: Regional Commercial (C-3)
PROPERTY OWNER:
Golden Springs Asset LLC
20657 Golden Springs Drive, Suite 201
Diamond Bar, CA 91789
APPLICANT:
Steve Lee
3935 Landmark Lane
Brea, CA 92823
SUMMARY:
On June 22, 2021, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing
regarding a request for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to operate a boutique fitness
studio (Fitness 100) in a 3,966 square-foot tenant space within Golden Springs Plaza, a
multi-tenant two-story commercial building on a 2.30-acre (100,271 square-foot) lot.
Commissioner Wolfe raised a concern about the potential noise levels emanating from
the fitness studio and affecting adjacent businesses, and suggested that staff research
acceptable interior noise levels to ensure that there is no spillover noise that would
adversely impact adjoining businesses. By a 4 -1 vote, the Planning Commission
continued the hearing to July 13, 2021, to allow staff to research the matter and
formulate an appropriate condition of approval to address potential sound transmission
between partitioned tenant spaces.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ~ 21810 COPLEY DRIVE ~ DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 ~ TEL. (909) 839-7030 ~ FAX (909) 861-3117
7.1
Packet Pg. 50
Conditional Use Permit Planning Case No. PL2021-19
Page 2 of 4
At the July 13, 2021, Planning Commission meeting, the Planning Commission again
continued the hearing to July 27, 2021, to allow staff time to research the question.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the attached Resolution (Attachment A) approving Conditional Use Permit
No. PL2021-19, based on the findings of Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC)
Section 22.58, subject to conditions.
ANALYSIS:
Noise
Music inside of the proposed fitness studio will be played at a low volume in the
background (approximately 40 decibels) at an ambient sound level as not to disrupt
conversations, coaching, and consultation sessions. The fitness stu dio focuses on
individual coaching and training, and will not have group classes. All activities
associated with the fitness studio will be located indoors. Most clients utilize their own
earphones during workout sessions once their training program s have been
established. Furthermore, the studio prohibits disruptive behavior, such as dropping
weights and dumbbells, in order to maintain a pleasant environment.
To alleviate any potential noise concerns, the entire workout space will be covered with
¾-inch thick sound deafening rubber flooring. Rubber flooring is a standard treatment
for weight rooms where dumbbells, kettlebells, and other heavy workout accessories
are likely to be dropped. Moreover, rubber flooring is commonly placed underneath
weight machines and equipment to help attenuate and absorb unwanted sound
transmitted through flooring to other areas of the building. The rear door, which is 1 ¾-
inch thick solid-core wood, is tight-fitting and self-closing and will remain closed. The
solid-core door will help block sound transmission compared to a hollow-core door that
is typical of most interior doors.
The tenant space’s demising walls have a Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of
45-49, which is typical for unenhanced partition walls. STC is an integer rating used to
calculate the effectiveness of soundproofing materials in reducing the transmission of
sound between rooms. STC is a widely used measurement of sound attenuation
performance of wall and floor systems and is measured roughly b y the decibel reduction
in noise that materials or partitions can provide. The Building Code requires that walls
separating residential dwelling units from other units and exterior noise have a minimum
STC rating of 50. The Building Code does not have a n STC standard for commercial
demising walls.
To provide context to STC ratings and their effectiveness, the following table from the
North American Insulation Manufacturers Association pairs a STC rating with a
subjective experience to determine the degree of sound isolation:
7.1
Packet Pg. 51
Conditional Use Permit Planning Case No. PL2021-19
Page 3 of 4
STC Rating Speech Audibility* Noise Control Rating
15 to 25 Normal speech easily understood Poor
25 to 35 Loud speech easily understood. Normal speech
50% understood.
Marginal
35 to 45 Loud speech 50% understood. Normal speech
faintly heard, but not understood.
Good
45 to 55 Loud speech faintly heard, but not understood.
Normal speech usually inaudible.
Very Good
55 and up Loud speech usually inaudible Excellent
* Given a typical background noise level of 30 decibels on the “listening” side
Staff researched surrounding cities and their requirements for interior noise levels for
fitness facilities and found that the conditions of approval pertaining to noise required
reduced volume of music or the use of sound-absorbing materials such as flooring and
wall panels.
Staff recommends that Condition of Approval no. 4 to be revised as follows:
If, at any time, the City finds that the Use is the cause of a parking deficiency, noise
nuisance, or other land use impact, within or beyond the subject property boundaries,
the Community Development Director, after providing the entitlement holder a
reasonable opportunity to mitigate the impact(s) to an acceptable level, may refer the
matter back to the Planning Commission to consider amendin g or revoking this
Conditional Use Permit to address such impacts.
Based on the characteristics of the proposed use, together with the proposed amended
language to Condition no. 4, it is staff’s opinion that the proposed fitness studio would
not be a nuisance to the adjacent businesses. The fitness studio is also oriented away
from any residential uses and is facing the 60 Freeway. In the future, should there be
noise complaints, the City may bring the matter back to the Planning Commission to
address such impacts, such as installing sound attenuation products. Given the
proposed business operations, availability of parking, types of adjoining uses, and noise
control mitigation measures, it is reasonable to conclude that the proposed fitness
studio will be compatible with the other uses in the center and the surrounding
neighborhood.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING:
On June 9, 2021, public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 500 -
foot radius of the project site. On June 11, 2021, the notice was published in the San
Gabriel Valley Tribune newspaper; the project site was posted with a notice display
board; and a copy of the public notice was posted at the City’s designated community
posting sites. The Planning Commission continued the item from the June 22, 2021,
meeting to July 13, 2021. Another continuance was requested from the July 13, 2021 ,
7.1
Packet Pg. 52
Conditional Use Permit Planning Case No. PL2021-19
Page 4 of 4
meeting to July 27, 2021. Since the hearing was never closed and was continued to
dates certain, the Project was not required to be re-noticed.
Public Comments Received
No comments were received prior to and a t the previous Planning Commission hearing
on June 22, 2021. In addition, no comments have been received as of the publication
date of this report.
PREPARED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
Attachments:
A. Draft Resolution No. 2021-XX and Standard Conditions of Approval
B. Planning Commission Staff Report Dated June 22, 2021
C. Minutes from the June 22, 2021 Planning Commission Meeting
7.1
Packet Pg. 53
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND
BAR, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. PL2021-19, TO
OPERATE A FITNESS STUDIO (FITNESS 100) WITHIN A 3,966 SQUARE-FOOT
TENANT SPACE LOCATED AT 20657 GOLDEN SPRINGS DRIVE, SUITE 111A,
DIAMOND BAR, CA (APN 8763-007-022).
A. RECITALS
1. Property owner, Golden Springs Asset LLC, and applicant, Steve Lee for Fitness
100, have filed an application for Conditional Use Permit No. PL 2021-19 to
operate a fitness studio for Fitness 100 in a 3,966 square-foot tenant space within
an existing shopping center, Golden Springs Plaza . The project site is more
specifically described as 20657 Golden Springs Drive, Suite 111A, Diamond Bar,
Los Angeles County, California. Hereinafter in this resolution, the subject
Conditional Use Permit shall collectively be referred to as the “Project” or
“Proposed Use.”
2. The subject property is comprised of a 2.30 gross acre parcel. It is located in the
Regional Commercial (C-3) zone with a General Plan land use designation of
General Commercial.
3. The Assessor’s Parcel Number is 8763-007-022.
4. On June 11, 2021, notification of the public hearing for this project was published
in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune newspaper. On June 9, 2021, public hearing
notices were mailed to property owners within a 500-foot radius of the Project site
and posted at the City’s designated community posting sites. The Planning
Commission continued the item from the June 22, 2021, meeting to July 13,
2021. On July 13, 2021, the Planning Commission again continued the matter to
July 27, 2021. Since the hearing was continued to a date certain, the Project was
not required to be re-noticed.
5. On July 27, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar
conducted a duly noticed public hearing, solicited testimony from all interested
individuals, and concluded said hearing on that date.
B. RESOLUTION
NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission
of the City of Diamond Bar as follows:
1. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth
in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 54
2
PC Resolution No. 2021-XX
2. The Planning Commission hereby determines the Project to be Categorically
Exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
pursuant to the provisions of Article 19, Section 15301(a) (Interior alterations
involving partitions and electrical conveyances) of the CEQA Guidelines.
Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
C. FINDINGS OF FACT
Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein and as prescribed un der
Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Section 22.58, this Planning Commission hereby
finds and approves as follows:
Conditional Use Permit Review Findings (DBMC Section 22.58)
1. The Proposed Use is allowed within the subject zoning district with the approval
of a conditional use permit and complies with all other applicable provisions of
this Development Code and the Municipal Code.
Pursuant to DBMC Section 22.10.030 Table 2-6, health and fitness facilities, as
defined by DBMC Section 22.80.020, are permitted in the C-3 zoning district with
approval of a conditional use permit. The proposed fitness studio will be located
in a tenant space within Golden Springs Plaza, an existing shopping center .
Through compliance with the conditions of approval stipulating the manner in
which the use must be conducted, the proposed fitness studio will be compatible
with neighboring uses in the commercial center and surrounding neighborhood.
2. The Proposed Use is consistent with the general plan and any applicable specific
plan.
The Proposed Use is consistent with General Plan Goal LU-G-11: (“Support
existing commercial centers by encouraging ongoing investment and, where
appropriate, reuse and redevelopment”) in that the Proposed Use will occupy an
existing tenant space.
The Proposed Use is consistent with General Plan Goal ED -G-3: (“Support the
retention, rehabilitation, and/or expansion of existing businesses, and the
attraction of new businesses”) in that the Proposed Use is a new business
locating within an existing shopping center.
The Project site is not subject to the provisions of any specific plan.
3. The design, location, size and operating characteristics of the Proposed Use are
compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity.
The Proposed Use will be located within an existing tenant space at Golden
Springs Plaza, a multi-tenant, two-story commercial building occupied by a
variety of uses including restaurants, personal services, and medical and
professional offices. The Proposed Use complies with the City’s Development
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 55
3
PC Resolution No. 2021-XX
Code parking requirement as well as parking demand. The Proposed Use will
operate from 6 a.m. to 9 p.m., Monday through Sunday. To alleviate any potential
noise concerns, any background music will be played at a low volume as to not
disrupt conversations. In addition, the entire workout space will be covered with
¾-inch thick sound deafening rubber flooring. The rear door is constructed of
solid-core wood and is tight-fitting and self-closing, which will help block sound
transmission compared to a hollow-core door that is typical of most interior doors.
Demising walls include sound-attenuating construction materials and have a STC
45-49 rating.
Through compliance with the conditions of approval stipulating the manner in
which the use must be conducted, the Proposed Use will be compatible with the
other uses within the commercial building and surrounding neighborhood.
4. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of use
being proposed, including access, provision of utilities, compatibility with
adjoining land uses, and the absence of physical constraints.
The Proposed Use is physically suitable within the subject site because it will be
located in an existing vacant tenant space within an existing commercial building,
and no additional square footage is being proposed. In addition, the Proposed
Use will be using existing access and parking. Golden Springs Plaza provides
243 on-site parking spaces. The parking required for the current palette of uses
excluding the proposed fitness studio is 199 spaces. The proposed fitness studio
requires a minimum of 24 spaces. The total off-street parking requirement for the
subject site would thus be 223 parking spaces, leaving a surplus of 20 spaces
based on Development Code requirements. The existing parking supply would
accommodate the parking demand of existing uses and the proposed fitness
studio. Given the proposed hours of operation, the overall parking demands, and
the types of adjoining uses, it is reasonable to conclude that the proposed fitness
studio will be compatible with the other uses in the commercial center and
neighborhood.
The proposed use is physically suitable at the subject site because it is operating
within an existing commercial center and will be using existing access and
parking in the center.
5. Granting the conditional use permit will not be detrimental to the public interest,
health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or injurious to persons, property, or
improvements in the vicinity and zoning district in which the property is located.
Prior to the issuance of any city permits, the Project is required to comply with all
conditions of approval within the attached resolution, and the Building and Safety
Division.
6. The proposed Project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 56
4
PC Resolution No. 2021-XX
The proposed use is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as set forth under Article 19
Section 15301(a) (Interior alterations involving partitions and electrical
conveyances) of the CEQA Guidelines.
D. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Based upon the findings and conclusion set forth above, the Planning Commission
hereby approves Conditional Use Permit No. PL2021-19 subject to the following
conditions:
1. This approval is for the operation of a fitness studio for Fitness 100 in a 3,966
square-foot tenant space at Golden Springs Plaza, an existing commercial
building as described in the application on file with the Planning Division, the
Planning Commission staff report for Conditional Use Permit No. PL2021-19
dated July 27, 2021, and the Planning Commission minutes pertaining thereto,
hereafter referred to as the “Use.”
2. The Use shall substantially conform to the approved plans as submitted and
approved by the Planning Commission and on file with the Community
Development Department.
3. This Conditional Use Permit shall be valid only for 20657 Golden Springs Drive,
Suite 111A, as depicted on the approved plans on file with the Planning Division.
If the Proposed Use expands into additional tenant spaces, the approved
Conditional Use Permit shall terminate and a new Conditional Use Permit, subject
to Planning Commission approval shall be required for the new location.
4. If, at any time, the City finds that the Use is the cause of a parking deficiency,
noise nuisance, or other land use impact, within or beyond the subject property
boundaries, the Community Development Director, after providing the entitlement
holder a reasonable opportunity to mitigate the impact(s) to an acceptable level,
may refer the matter back to the Planning Commission to consider amending or
revoking this Conditional Use Permit to address such impacts.
5. No changes to the approved scope of services comprising the use shall be
permitted unless the applicant first applies for an amendment to this Condit ional
Use Permit, pays all application processing fees and receives approval from the
Planning Commission.
6. Building and Safety Division
(a) The occupant load shall be limited to 15.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 57
5
PC Resolution No. 2021-XX
The Planning Commission shall:
(a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and
(b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail to
the property owner, Golden Springs Asset LLC, 20657 Golden Springs Dr.,
Ste 201, Diamond Bar, CA 91789; and applicant, Steve Lee, 3935
Landmark Ln., Brea, CA 92823.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF JULY, 2021, BY THE PLANNING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR.
By: ______________________________________
William Rawlings, Chairperson
I, Greg Gubman, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 27th day of July, 2021, by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners:
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST: ___________________________
Greg Gubman, Secretary
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 58
6
PC Resolution No. 2021-XX
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
USE PERMITS, COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL
NEW AND REMODELED STRUCTURES
PROJECT #: Conditional Use Permit No. PL2021-19
SUBJECT: To operate a fitness studio for Fitness 100 in a 3,966 square-foot
tenant space at Golden Springs Plaza, an existing commercial
building
PROPERTY Golden Springs Asset LLC
OWNER(S): 20657 Golden Springs Drive, Ste 201
Diamond Bar, CA 91789
APPLICANT: Steve Lee for Fitness 100
3935 Landmark Lane
Brea, CA 92823
LOCATION: 20657 Golden Springs Drive, Suite 111A
Diamond Bar, CA 91789
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION AT (909) 839-7030, FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
A. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
1. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, and its officers,
agents and employees, from any claim, action, or proceeding to attack, set-aside,
void, or annul the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. PL2021-19 brought
within the time period provided by Government Code Section 66499.37. In the
event the city and/or its officers, agents and employees are made a party of any
such action:
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 59
7
PC Resolution No. 2021-XX
(a) Applicant shall provide a defense to the City defendants or at the City's
option reimburse the City its costs of defense, including reasonable
attorney fees, incurred in defense of such claims.
(b) Applicant shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against the City
defendants. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim,
action of proceeding, and shall cooperate fully in the defense thereof.
2. This approval shall not be effective for any purpose until the applicant and owner
of the property involved have filed, within twenty-one (21) days of approval of this
Conditional Use Permit No. PL2021-19 at the City of Diamond Bar Community
Development Department, their affidavit stating that they are aware of and agree
to accept all the conditions of this approval. Further, this approval shall not be
effective until the applicants pay remaining City processing fees.
3. The business owners and all designers, architects, engineers, and contractors
associated with this project shall obtain a Diamond Bar Business License for
those businesses located in Diamond Bar.
4. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon,
all conditions of approval shall be completed.
5. The project site shall be maintained and operated in full compliance with the
conditions of approval and all laws, or other applicable regulations.
6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the
Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and any applicable
Specific Plan in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
7. To ensure compliance with all conditions of approval and applicable codes, the
Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to periodic review. If non -compliance
with conditions of approval occurs, the Planning Commission may review the
Conditional Use Permit. The Commission may revoke or modify the Conditional
Use Permit.
8. Property owner/applicant shall remove the public hearing notice board within
three (3) days of this project's approval.
9. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of City Planning, Building and
Safety Divisions, Public Works Department, and the Fire Department.
B. FEES/DEPOSITS
1. Applicant shall pay development fees (including but not limited to Planning,
Building and Safety Divisions, and Public Works Department) at the established
rates, prior to issuance of building permits, as required by the City. School fees
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 60
8
PC Resolution No. 2021-XX
as required shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permit. In addition, the
applicant shall pay all remaining prorated City project review and processing fees
prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever comes first.
2. Prior to any plan check, all deposit accounts for the processing of this project
shall have no deficits.
C. TIME LIMITS
1. The approval of Conditional Use Permit No. PL2021-19 shall expire within one
(1) year from the date of approval if the use has not been exercised as defined
per DBMC Section 22.66.050 (b)(1). The applicant may request in writing a one-
year time extension subject to DBMC Section 22.60.050(c) for Planning
Commission approval.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 839-7020,
FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. All work shall be in conformance to the 2019 California Building Code series.
2. Existing ADA facilities shall be upgraded to current requirements as per CBC 11B-202.
3. The two exits shall be maintained at all times and exit signage and lighting maintained
to the front and rear corridor exit.
4. The occupant load shall be limited to 15.
5. Plumbing fixture count shall be in accordance with CPC Table 422.1 based on CPC
Table A.
6. Electrical plans shall be required for electrical upgrades required for the tenant
improvement. This will include panel load calculations to be approved in plan check.
END
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 61
PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 7.1
MEETING DATE: June 22, 2021
CASE/FILE NUMBER: Conditional Use Permit Planning Case No.
PL2021-19
PROJECT LOCATION:
20657 Golden Springs Drive, Suite 111A
Diamond Bar, CA 91789
(APN 8763-007-022)
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial (C)
ZONING DISTRICT: Regional Commercial (C-3)
PROPERTY OWNER:
Golden Springs Asset LLC
20657 Golden Springs Drive, Suite 201
Diamond Bar, CA 91789
APPLICANT:
Steve Lee
3935 Landmark Lane
Brea, CA 92823
SUMMARY:
The applicant, Steve Lee, is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to
operate a fitness studio (Fitness 100) in a 3,966 square-foot tenant space within Golden
Springs Plaza, a multi-tenant two-story commercial building on a 2.30-acre
(100,271 square-foot) lot.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the attached Resolution (Attachment 1) approving Conditional Use Permit
No. PL2021-19, based on the findings of Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC)
Section 22.58, subject to conditions.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ~ 21810 COPLEY DRIVE ~ DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 ~ TEL. (909) 839-7030 ~ FAX (909) 861-3117
7.1.b
Packet Pg. 62
Conditional Use Permit Planning Case No. PL2021-19
Page 2 of 8
BACKGROUND:
On July 20, 2004, the City Council approved Golden Springs Plaza, a 52,647 square -
foot, two-story commercial building located at the northwest corner of Golden Springs
Drive and Banning Way. Golden Springs Plaza has a variety of uses, including
restaurants, medical and professional offices, and personal service uses. There are
ground-level and underground parking spaces available on site, for a total of
243 parking spaces.
Site and Surrounding General Plan, Zoning and Land Uses
The project site is bound by the State Route 60 freeway to the north, Banning Way to
the east, Golden Springs Drive to the south, and Lemon Avenue to the west. Adjacent
existing land uses include a nursery to the north, single -family residences to the south,
and a variety of commercial and office uses to the east and west of the subject site.
Aerial View
7.1.b
Packet Pg. 63
Conditional Use Permit Planning Case No. PL2021-19
Page 3 of 8
Storefront of Tenant Lease Space
The following table describes the surrounding land uses located adjacent to the subject
property:
General Plan Designation Zoning Land Uses
Site General Commercial
Regional
Commercial
(C-3)
General Retail, Restaurant,
Office, and Personal
Service Uses.
North N/A N/A SR-60 Freeway and Nursery
South Low Density Residential
(RL)
Low Density
Residential
(RL)
Single-Family Residential
Southwest General Commercial (C)
Regional
Commercial
(C-3)
Personal Service Uses,
Restaurants, Liquor Store
East General Commercial (C)
Regional
Commercial
(C-3)
Professional Offices
West General Commercial (C)
Community
Commercial
(C-2)
General Retail, Restaurant,
Office, and Service Uses
7.1.b
Packet Pg. 64
Conditional Use Permit Planning Case No. PL2021-19
Page 4 of 8
Project Description
Fitness 100 is a private fitness facility for certified fitness professionals to train their
clients through personalized training programs. The fitness facility was previously
located in the City of Walnut and proposes to relocate to City of Diamond Bar, at Golden
Springs Plaza. The proposed fitness studio will offer a space to allow trainers to provide
private training sessions with their clients on an appointment -only basis. The business
will not hold group classes, and memberships are not sold. The fitness studio will also
have a selection of products for sale, including nutritional supplements, refreshments,
and other related products.
Proposed Floor Plan
The proposed fitness studio will be open seven days per week, from 6 a.m. to 9 p.m.
There will be approximately 15 trainers (part time and full time) as independent
contractors who offer private individual training sessions tailored to their clients. The
trainers will develop personalized programs for their clients with training sessions that
last from 30 minutes to an hour maximum. All training sessions are scheduled in
advance to ensure that the occupancy is limited to 9 or less. The client may train by
themselves or with their trainer. A condition of approval from the Building and Safety
Division states that the maximum number of people inside be limited to 15.
7.1.b
Packet Pg. 65
Conditional Use Permit Planning Case No. PL2021-19
Page 5 of 8
The proposed floor plan includes two offices, a storage closet, and a training area with
training equipment. The tenant space will have access to the building’s interior common
area to utilize the restrooms.
ANALYSIS:
Review Authority (DBMC Section 22.58)
A CUP is required for uses whose effect on the surrounding area cannot be determined
before being analyzed for suitability at a particular location.
When reviewing a CUP, consideration is given to the location, design, configuration,
operational characteristics and potential impacts to determine whether or not the
proposed use will pose a detriment to the public health, safety and welfare. If it can be
found that the proposed use is likely to be compatible with its surroundings, the
Commission may approve the proposed use subject to conditions stipulating the
manner in which the use must be conducted. If the Co mmission finds that the proposed
use is likely to be detrimental to the general peace, health and general welfare, then it
must deny the request.
When a CUP is approved, it runs with the land and all conditions placed on the CUP are
binding on all successors in interest. In other words, if the owner were to close the
business, a new tenant could locate in the space and operate the same type of
business. The new tenant would be required to comply with the same conditions as the
previous tenant and would not be permitted to expand the business without full review
and approval by the Planning Commission.
Required Parking
The required number of parking spaces for health and fitness uses is one space per 150
square feet of gross floor area. General office u ses requires one space per 400 square
feet of gross floor area. Current parking standards require shopping centers larger than
50,000 square feet in size to provide one parking space for every 300 square feet of
gross floor area.
The project site provides 243 off-street parking spaces, with ground-level and
underground parking. The two-story commercial building is approximately 52,647
square feet. The parking required for the current palette of uses excluding the proposed
fitness studio is 199 spaces. The proposed fitness studio requires a minimum of 24
spaces. The total off-street parking requirement for the subject site would thus be 223
parking spaces, leaving a surplus of 20 spaces based on Development Code
requirements. The table below provides a summary of the parking requirements for the
fitness studio.
7.1.b
Packet Pg. 66
Conditional Use Permit Planning Case No. PL2021-19
Page 6 of 8
City’s Development Code Parking Requirement
Use Sq. Ft. Parking Ratio Parking
Required
Parking
Provided
Shopping Center 43,862 1/300 sq. ft. 146
Yamaha Music
(CUP PL2010-263) 2,271
1 space per 200
sq. ft. plus 1
space per
employee
33
US Art Center
CUP PL2012-1107 2,600
1 space per 200
sq. ft. plus 1
space per
employee
20
Proposed Fitness
Studio (Suite 111A)
3,350 Fitness Area
564 Office Area
1/150 sq. ft.
1/400 sq. ft. 24
Total 52,647 223 243
Parking Demand
When reviewing parking impacts on shopping centers, the various uses and peak
business hours for those uses are taken into consideration. The existing shopping
center has uses ranging from restaurants, medical and professional offices, personal
services, and specialized education uses. The varying uses result in a range of peak
business hours and parking demands. The peak parking demand occurs on weekdays
from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. Although the proposed fitness studio is proposed to be open
seven days a week from 6 a.m. to 9 p.m., the hours of operation will provide trainers
and their clients more flexibility for scheduling training sessions. The training sessions
generally last from 30 minutes to an hour at most. As there are no shower rooms on
site, clients typically leave after their workout. This will allow the fitness studio to better
manage the number of people inside and limit any overlapping schedules. As a result,
there will be limited demand for parking spaces during the fitness studio’s extensive
operating hours.
Based on their business proposal and the maximum occupancy load per the Building
and Safety Division’s condition of approval, the business will need a maximum of 9
parking spaces. Under a parking demand sce nario, the proposed use may generate
less demand. As the center has 243 parking spaces available, there would still be a
surplus of 26 parking spaces under this parking demand scenario.
7.1.b
Packet Pg. 67
Conditional Use Permit Planning Case No. PL2021-19
Page 7 of 8
Parking Demand
Use Sq. Ft. Parking Ratio Parking
Required
Parking
Provided
Shopping Center 43,862 1/300 sq. ft. 146
Yamaha Music
(CUP PL2010-263) 2,271
15 students, 8
teachers,
2 admin. staff
25
US Art Center
CUP PL2012-1107 2,600
Maximum of 7
staff members
and 30 students
at any one time
37
Proposed Fitness
Studio (Suite 111A)
3,350 Fitness Area
564 Office Area
Maximum of 9
people at any
one time
9
Total 52,647 217 243
Staff does not foresee any parking issues resulting from the proposed use. The existing
parking supply is adequate and can accommodate the proposed fitness studio use. In
addition, the proposed fitness studio will not increase any square footage to the existing
building.
Compatibility with Neighborhood
Golden Springs Plaza has a variety of uses, including restaurants, medical and
professional offices, and personal service uses. The center is surrounded by a nursery
and the 60 freeway to the north, single-family residences to the south, and a variety of
commercial and office uses to the east and west.
The operational characteristics of the proposed fitness studio are compatible with the
existing uses in the center as well as the surrounding neighborhood. Given the
proposed hours of operation, the availability of parking, and the diversity of uses, the
proposed fitness studio is expected to be a compatible use at this location. In addition,
the proposed use is consistent with the current zoning designation of Regional
Commercial.
Project Site
7.1.b
Packet Pg. 68
Conditional Use Permit Planning Case No. PL2021-19
Page 8 of 8
Additional Review
The Building and Safety Division reviewed this project, and their comments are included
in the attached resolution as conditions of approval.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING:
On June 9, 2021, public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 500 -
foot radius of the project site. On June 11, 2021, the notice was published in the San
Gabriel Valley Tribune newspaper; the project site was posted with a notice display
board; and a copy of the public notice was posted at the City’s designated community
posting sites.
Public Comments Received
No comments have been received as of the publication date of this report.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT:
This project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA). Based on that assessment, the City has determined the project to be
Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to the provisions of
Article 19 Section 15301(a) (Interior alterations involving partitions and electrical
conveyances) of the CEQA Guidelines. No further environmental review is required.
PREPARED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
Attachments:
A. Draft Resolution No. 2021-XX and Standard Conditions of Approval
B. Business Plan
C. Site Plan and Floor Plan
7.1.b
Packet Pg. 69
MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
DIAMOND BAR CITY HALL WINDMILL COMMUNITY ROOM
21810 COPLEY DRIVE, DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765
JUNE 22, 2021
CALL TO ORDER:
Chair/Rawlings called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Commissioner Mok led the Pledge of Allegiance.
1. ROLL CALL: Commissioners: Naila Barlas, Kenneth Mok, Raymond
Wolfe, Vice Chairman Mahendra Garg, Chairman William
Rawlings.
Staff Present : Greg Gubman, Community Development Director; James
Eggart, Assistant City Attorney; Grace Lee, Senior Planner; Mayuko (May) Nakajima,
Associate Planner; Joy Tsai, Assistant Planner; Kristina Santana, City Clerk; Stella Marquez,
Administrative Coordinator.
2. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: None Offered.
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: As presented
4. CONSENT CALENDAR:
4.1 Minutes of the Regular Planning Commission Meeting of June 8,
2021.
C/Mok moved, VC/Garg seconded, to approve Consent Calendar as
presented. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Barlas, Mok, Wolfe, VC/Garg,
Chair/Rawlings
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None
5. OLD BUSINESS: None
6. NEW BUSINESS: None
7. PUBLIC HEARING(S):
7.1 Conditional Use Permit Planning Case No. PL2021-19 – Under the authority
of Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.58, the applicant requested
Conditional Use Permit approval to operate a fitness studio in a 3,966 square foot
7.1.c
Packet Pg. 70
________________________________________________________________________
JUNE 22, 2021 PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION
________________________________________________________________________
lease space located at Golden Springs Plaza. The subject property is zoned
Regional Commercial (C-3) with an underlying General Plan land use designation
of General Commercial.
PROJECT ADDRESS: 20657 Golden Springs Drive, Suite 111A
Diamond Bar, CA 91789
APPLICANT: Steve Lee
3935 Landmark Lane
Brea, CA 92823
PROPERTY OWNER: Golden Springs Asset LLC
20657 Golden Springs Drive, Suite 201
Diamond Bar, CA 91789
AP/Tsai presented staff’s report and recommended Planning Commission
approval of Conditional Use Permit Planning Case No. PL2021 -19, based on the
Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the
resolution.
VC/Garg asked if there was only one entrance to the building and AP/Tsai
explained that there is one entrance to the unit and a rear exit point in case of
emergency that also provides access to the shared restroom facilities. VC/Garg
asked how many sessions would be conducted during the day and AP/Tsai
directed VC/Garg to the applicant for a response. VC/Garg questioned whether
the number of allocated parking spaces was sufficient. CDD/Gubman explained
there are 243 non-exclusive parking spaces available on an aggregate basis that
can be used by any patron of the property.
C/Mok asked how many units are vacant in the center, and AP/Tsai said she did
not have that information but was told by the landlord that they are having trouble
leasing out bigger spaces and that other tenants have left due to the pandemic.
Chair/Rawlings opened public comments.
Steve Lee, applicant, stated that 24 parking slots should not be a problem
because one trainer works with a single patron for about an hour who leaves
when another arrives.
C/Mok asked if Mr. Lee outgrew the Walnut facility and plans to relocate to a
larger facility in Diamond Bar. Mr. Lee explained that his business was in
Diamond Bar six years ago and when the rent increased, he moved to a smaller
facility in Walnut. Now the trainers want a larger facility which caused him to
return to Diamond Bar.
7.1.c
Packet Pg. 71
________________________________________________________________________
JUNE 22, 2021 PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION
________________________________________________________________________
C/Barlas asked how many trainers and employees would be at the location at
any given time and Mr. Lee responded five to six.
Chair/Rawlings closed public comments.
C/Wolfe said he appreciates businesses wishing to relocate in the City but is
concerned about the noise level affecting adjacent businesses and stated that
according to his research, 88 decibels for 45 minutes is a maximum amount of
noise level. He suggested this item be sent back to staff to determine an
acceptable interior noise level to make sure there is no spillover noise that would
adversely impact adjoining businesses.
Following discussion, C/Wolfe moved, C/Mok seconded, to reopen the public
hearing and continue the public hearing to July 13th to allow staff to establish an
acceptable noise level threshold for these types of establishments so as not to
disrupt adjoining businesses. Motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Barlas, Mok, Wolfe, Chair/Rawlings
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: VC/Garg
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None
7.2 Conditional Use Permit Planning Case No. PL2021-18 – Under the
authority of Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.58, the applicant requested
Conditional Use Permit approval to operate a medical laboratory use for Innova
Biolab, a clinical laboratory, in a 19,501 square foot space at an existing 36,748
square foot office building on a 3.37 acre (143,748 square foot) site. The subject
property is zoned Professional Office (OP) with an underlying General Plan land
use designation of Office.
PROJECT ADDRESS: 3333 Diamond Canyon Road, Suite 100
Diamond Bar, CA 91789
APPLICANT: Teresa Cheung
1142 S. Diamond Bar Boulevard #423
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
PROPERTY OWNER: Jordan Wang for Innova Biolab
1977 N. Garey Avenue
Pomona, CA 91767
AP/Nakajima presented staff’s report and recommended Planning Commission
approval of Conditional Use Permit Planning Case No. PL2021-18, based on the
7.1.c
Packet Pg. 72
________________________________________________________________________
JUNE 22, 2021 PAGE 4 PLANNING COMMISSION
________________________________________________________________________
Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the
resolution. It was added that should the Commission approve this conditional use
permit, staff recommends the addition of the following condition of approval:
“The applicant shall at all times comply with the requirements of the agencies
responsible for licensing and regulating clinical laboratories, includ ing the Food
and Drug Administration, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.”
With this added condition, staff believes it should cover the types of testing and
hazardous waste handling. If they violate any rules as defined by the FDC, CMS
or CDC, the Planning Commission has the authority to revoke the CUP.
AP/Nakajima stated that additionally, staff is recommending an amendment to
Condition #1 which mentions the company name (Innova Biolab), which s hould
be removed since the CUP runs with the land use, and not a specific business
entity, and further recommends the addition of language to specify the limits to
the scope of the proposed use:
“This approval is for the operation of a 4,000 square -foot, Biosafety Level 2
(BSL-2) medical laboratory use within a 19,501 square-foot space at an existing
office building as described in the application on file with the Planning Division,
the Planning Commission staff report for Conditional Use Permit No. PL2021-18
dated June 22, 2021, and the Planning Commission minutes pertaining thereto,
hereafter referred to as the “Use.”
Chair/Rawlings referred to a CDC document that indicated “those types of
facilities would be limited to bacteria virus that cause mild disease to humans or
are difficult to contract near aerosol in a lab setting” and asked if that was correct.
AP/Nakajima responded that the information she received from the CDC website
that stated “it covers labels that work with agents associated with human
diseases, pathogenic or infections, organisms that pose a moderate health
hazard. Examples include viruses such as the HIV virus”. She further stated that
any changes to the proposed use or the floorplan would require another public
hearing before the Planning Commission to amend the CUP.
Chair/Rawlings asked for response to whether a BSL 2 requires that any
procedures that may lead to squashing or potential aerosol of material would be
limited to an area that has a biological safety cabinet and that the BSL Level 2
requires that (the biolab) decontaminate work surfaces at least daily and that the
waste materials are decontaminated prior to disposal. AP/Nakajima said it was
her understanding during discussions with the applicant that waste would be
decontaminated prior to disposal.
7.1.c
Packet Pg. 73
________________________________________________________________________
JUNE 22, 2021 PAGE 5 PLANNING COMMISSION
________________________________________________________________________
C/Mok said that from his reading the testimonies from emails and documents, the
major concern was that the testing was going to be done on SARS or COVID-19.
If the biolab is operating at BSL Level 2, is there a law or medical condition tha t
says it cannot test COVID-19, SARS or any other high-risk specimen of that
caliber and AP/Nakajima responded that according to the CDC website, routine
diagnostic testing of COVID-19 is available for BSL Level 2 laboratories. An
option would be for the Commission to include a condition limiting or prohibiting
COVID-19 at the site, if it wished to do so. C/Mok asked what would prevent this
or any lab from testing COVID-19 on the sly and if protocol were broken, who
would enforce it and would there be regular inspections or a watchdog
organization ensuring those kinds of tests were not being performed.
AP/Nakajima responded that it would be enforced by the FDA, CMS and CDC.
She was not certain about the frequency of inspections, but her understanding is
that there are several inspections the biolab would need to pass. C/Mok referred
to Attachment D (Suite 100) of the floorplan and said he noticed that the two labs
are in the open when almost all of the other work areas are behind closed doors
which to him is both promising and problematic – promising because the
operators of the lab must feel that what they are testing is safe enough to be do ne
in the open and problematic, because something could happen in the open and
not behind closed doors that could be catastrophic.
C/Barlas said that if BSL Level 2 wants to do COVID testing, they have to be at
BSL Level 2 enhanced or 2.5 which requires certification from the Institute of the
Viral Safety Committee. She asked to have the applicant comment on this
statement.
Chair/Rawlings opened the public hearing.
Jordan Wang stated that Biolab was acquired by Innova in December 2020 and
prior to that, the lab was located on Valley Vista in Diamond Bar for about six
years after which the lab moved to Pomona where a drive -through was located.
He understands the concerns about Level 2, but during the COVID pandemic,
the lab tested about two million patients and not one lab tech or testing staff
contracted COVID. On the outside of the lab, there is indication day to day that
COVID at the lab is present through a swab with no particles flying through the
air or contaminating the environment. The positive about having the Innova lab
in Diamond Bar is that the staff is routinely (weekly) tested and will continue to
wear masks until at least 2022.
Mr. Wang responded to Chair/Rawlings that all of the bio safety cabinets are
certified CEPA regulated.
7.1.c
Packet Pg. 74
________________________________________________________________________
JUNE 22, 2021 PAGE 6 PLANNING COMMISSION
________________________________________________________________________
Mr. Wang responded to C/Barlas’s question that Innova is a Bio Level Safety 2,
a high complexity laboratory. COVID testing is a swab in a tube which is handled
and processed accordingly.
Mr. Wang confirmed to Chair/Rawlings that at the end of every shift, countertops
are bleached down and surfaces are mopped on a daily basis. BLS 2 is limited
to non-aerosol virus bacteria and while the public fears are reasonable, this is a
clinical lab and not an FDA research lab which would require a Bio Safety Level
4 with much more sophisticated equipment and facility enhancements.
C/Wolfe asked what steps have to be undertaken to increase the lab facilities in
addition to the physical improvements. Mr. Wang responded that the lab is not
equipped nor at the level to do FDA virus testings which are regulated by the
CDC, FDA, etc.
C/Mok asked Mr. Wang if the Commission approved this project under the
condition that Innova would not try to move the lab from a Level 2 to a Level 3,
and not include the testing of high-risk pathogens, specimens (SARS and
COVID-19) if the applicant would agree to that condition. Mr. Wang said that if
the lab followed the guidelines of the state and government, they would
technically be okay to do such testing, but if they were required to agree to such
a condition in order to move back to Diamond Bar, they would do so.
C/Barlas asked the applicant how many certified lab scientists would be working
at the same time in the lab and Mr. Wang responded six to seven. C/Barlas
asked how many were certified biologists and Mr. Wang responded two and the
rest are general or microbiologists. In addition, the lab has a bio-analyst on staff
and employs two consultants. Mr. Wang confirmed that the lab is at BSL Level 2
and will verify whether the lab is at an enhanced level. He offered the
Commissioners copies of the lab’s state license which he had in hand.
The following speakers submitted written comments and/or spoke in
opposition to Conditional Use Permit No. PL2021-18. Speaker indicated
with an asterisk spoke telephonically.
Wendy Tian
Jay Parsons, on behalf of the Diamond Canyon Homeowner’s Association
Michael Tian
Brian Tsai
Changming Qiu
Michelle Chen
Michelle Wu
David Chang
Yinting Qiu
7.1.c
Packet Pg. 75
________________________________________________________________________
JUNE 22, 2021 PAGE 7 PLANNING COMMISSION
________________________________________________________________________
Jasmine Hsu
David Wang
Michelle (Huai-Chien) Lo
Lee Pai
An Ching
*Jason Tien (not opposed to lab, but opposed to it being located as proposed)
*Zienghei Chai
No one spoke in favor of Conditional Use Permit No. PL2021-18.
Mr. Wang responded to speakers and Commissioner’s questions and concerns
and there being no other individuals wishing to speak, Chair/Rawlings closed the
public hearing.
C/Wolfe thanked the community for their participation. After extensive review of
the staff report and documents, it is his belief that this is not an appropriate or
compatible use for this particular location. The community is locked in and the
only access point is coming through in front of the building . The homes are
immediately adjacent to the facility and, he does not see that there is a lot of
control over the future proposed use of the facility.
C/Mok stated that the timing of this CUP is not good. This community and the
planet is hurting because of COVID and despite all of the improved conditions
regarding COVID and the lifted restrictions, there remains an open wound from
which people have not yet healed. Certain negative items stand out to him such
as, the most recent June 10th FDA warning to the parent company.
Unfortunately, the parent company messed up and others are paying for that
error. Secondly, there is incompatibility with the neighborhood, as indicated by
C/Wolfe. Third, he feels there is a potential that the BSL Level 2 could possibly
be upgraded to a BSL Level 3 in the future.
C/Barlas said she appreciated the community’s input and the Commissioners
vigilance. She is not that concerned about the bio-hazard risks because as a
biologist, she knows that California is one of the more fo rward states in the
country that has higher standards for the bio-labs and for the collection points.
While there is no precaution taken at that collection center, it has been properly
overseen by the oversight agencies and she is comfortable movin g forward with
the approval and, in fact, there is already a lab which is much closer to other
businesses and residential homes in Diamond Bar.
VC/Garg thanked the community for their participation and said he agreed with
Commissioners Mok and Wolfe about a possible upgrade of the lab to level 3 and
the concern about the business being located adjacent to residential dwellings.
7.1.c
Packet Pg. 76
________________________________________________________________________
JUNE 22, 2021 PAGE 8 PLANNING COMMISSION
________________________________________________________________________
Chair/Rawlings said that like C/Barlas he would be less concerned with the risk
of contagions if the City was able to place additional conditions on the operation
and the facility that would limit it to a Level 2 without COVID testing , but was
somewhat concerned about the single entry/exit neighborhood adjacent to the
business.
C/Wolfe moved, C/Mok seconded, to direct staff to prepare a resolution of denial
for Conditional Use Permit Planning Case No. PL2021 -18 to be brought back to
the Commission for consideration at the July 13th, 2021, meeting with finding that
Findings #3 and #5, that the operating characteristics and proposed uses are not
compatible with public safety and existing and future land uses in the community.
Motion carried 3-2 by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Mok, Wolfe, VC/Garg
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Barlas, Chair/Rawlings
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None
Chair/Rawlings said he was grateful for the public’s participation and
contributions to the City.
8. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
C/Mok expressed his gratitude to the community for their participation and was grateful
for the research and information provided by staff and commun ity members. He thanked
Jordan Wang for his participation and wished him good luck finding another facility.
C/Barlas thanked the community for their participation and staff for a great job on the
proposal and documentation.
VC/Garg thanked community members for their participation and said he would not be
available for the July 13th meeting.
Chair/Rawlings said he hoped Jordan Wang would look to continue doing business in
Diamond Bar and find a good spot for his business in the City.
9. STAFF COMMENTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
CDD/Gubman asked the City Attorney to provide clarification on the next steps with the
action the Commission is taking on the Conditional Use Permit denial.
7.1.c
Packet Pg. 77
________________________________________________________________________
JUNE 22, 2021 PAGE 9 PLANNING COMMISSION
________________________________________________________________________
ACA/Eggart explained that the reason this item has to come back to the Commission
for another meeting is that the Commission’s procedures and the law require any
decision of the Commission to be in writing and state the Findings and the Facts
supporting the decision. Tonight, the Planning Commission did not have a Resolution
citing facts supporting their decision to deny the CUP because staff’s recommendation
was for approval of the CUP and the written document denying the CUP has to come
back for approval at the next meeting to comply with the law. At that time, there will n ot
be a public hearing and no public comments will be received from the applicant and/or
the public. Until that time, the Commission’s action is not final and once it is final, if
approved, the applicant will have an opportunity to appeal the final decisi on to the City
Council after Commission action on July 13th, should the applicant choose to do so.
CDD/Gubman wished everyone a happy and festive 4th of July. The agenda for the next
meeting on July 13th includes a Conditional Use Permit for a veterinary office at the
former Whole Enchilada location in the Walmart/Crunch Fitness Center, a small cell
wireless Ordinance that provides an update on regulations for small cellular facilities, a
Public Hearing for a two-lot subdivision for the United Church of Christ Campus for the
contiguous vacant portion that will, if approved, be able to accommodate residential
units, further consideration of the Fitness 100 Conditional Use Permit with noise levels
reflected in the Conditions of Approval and, the Resolution of Denial for Conditional Use
Permit Planning Case No. PL2021-18.
10. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS:
As listed in the agenda.
ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Planning Commission,
Chair/Rawlings adjourned the regular meeting at 9:08 p.m.
The foregoing minutes are hereby approved this July 13, 2021.
Attest:
Respectfully Submitted,
_______________________________________
Greg Gubman, Community Development Director
______________________________
William Rawlings, Chairperson
7.1.c
Packet Pg. 78
Project Status Report CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
July 27, 2021 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
LEGEND PH = PUBLIC HEARING
X = NON PUBLIC HEARING
AP = ASSIGNED PLANNER
PC = PLANNING COMMISSION
AR = ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
CC = CITY COUNCIL
PROPERTY LOCATION
PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW File # AP Applicant PC
7/27/21
CC
8/3/21
PC
8/10/21
CC
8/17/21
PC
8/24/21
CC
9/7/21
3333 Diamond Canyon
(Medical office)
CUP PL2021-18 MN Jordan Wang X
20657 Golden Springs Dr., #111A
(Fitness studio)
CUP PL2021-19 JT Steve Lee Cont. PH
2335 S. Diamond Bar Blvd.
(2-lot subdivision) TPM PL2021-15 JT Samir Khoury PH
Small Wireless Ordinance DCA PL2021-44 MN City of Diamond Bar PH
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
Property Location AP Applicant
None
PENDING ITEMS
Property Location File # AP Applicant Status
1625 Bears Den Rd.
(Addition to single family residence)
DR PL2021-01 MN/
JT
Pete Volbeda First incomplete letter sent 2/5/21 – waiting for additional information
850 Brea Canyon Rd
(Modification to hotel and office project)
TPM/CUP/DR/PP/CSP
PL2017-169
GL Philip lee Under review
1198 Chisolm Trail Dr.
(New single-family residence)
DR PL2021-51 JT Michael Wu First incomplete letter sent 7/21/21 – waiting for additional information
Crooked Creek
(7-unit subdivision)
TTM, DR, CUP, TP
PL2017-203
MN New Bridge Homes Fourth incomplete letter sent 7/15/21 – waiting for additional information
2001 Derringer Ln.
(2-lot subdivision)
TPM 83036
PL2021-46
MN
Gurbachan S. Juneja First incomplete letter sent 6/24/21 – waiting for additional information
1139 S. Diamond Bar Blvd., Ste F
(CUP for fitness studio)
CUP PL2021-30 JT Shawn Zuo Second incomplete letter sent 7/20/21 – waiting for additional information
2751 S. Diamond Bar Blvd.
(Amendment to CUP PL2010-89 for after
school component)
CUP Amendment
PL2021-39
JT Lance Kim Under review
9.1
Packet Pg. 79
Project Status Report CITY OF DIAMOND BAR Page 2
July 27, 2021 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PENDING ITEMS (continued)
Property Location File # AP Applicant Status
24011 Falcons View Dr.
(Addition and remodel to single family
residence)
DR, MCUP, TP PL2020-25 MN William Edwards Under review
Gentle Springs Ln. and S. Prospectors
Rd.
GPA, ZC, VTTM, DR
PL2021-23
GL/
JT
Tranquil Garden LLC First incomplete letter sent 4/16/21 – waiting for additional information
21130 Golden Springs Dr.
(Amendment to MCUP for hookah
lounge)
Amendment to MCUP
PL2019-122
JT MHD Marwan
Almannini
Under Review
2234 Indian Creek Rd.
(New single-family residence)
DR PL2020-159 MN/
JT
Jeffrey Sun First incomplete letter sent 1/12/21 – waiting for additional information
22909 Lazy Trail Rd.
(Addition and remodel to single family
residence)
DR PL2021-5 JT Walt Petroske First incomplete letter sent 3/9/21 – waiting for additional information
22938 ½ Ridge Line Rd.
(Wireless facility)
CUP PL2020-42 NTE/
GL
Jill Cleveland Incomplete letter sent 4/1/20 – waiting for additional information
23121 Ridge Line Rd.
(New single family residence)
DR PL2020-31 NTE/
MN
Pete Volbeda Second incomplete letter sent 12/15/20 – waiting for additional information
2631 Rocky Trail Rd.
(Addition and remodel to single family
residence)
DR, MCUP PL2021-22 GL Katy Liu Second Incomplete letter sent 6/15/21
Walnut Valley Unified School District
(Billboard Ordinance)
PL2021-43 GL/
MN
WVUSD Under review
9.1
Packet Pg. 80
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
AND AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
I, Stella Marquez, declare as follows:
I am employed by the City of Diamond Bar, Community Development Department. On
July 23, 2021, a copy of the July 27, 2021, Planning Commission Agenda, was posted
at the following locations:
Diamond Bar City Hall, 21810 Copley Drive
SCAQMD/Government Center, 21865 Copley Drive
Heritage Park, 2900 Brea Canyon Road
City website: www,diamondbarea.gov
Due to COVID-19 closures, the Planning Commission Agenda could not be posted at
the following regular posting locations:
Diamond Bar Library
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed July 23, 2021, at Diamond Bar, California.
Stella Marquez
Community Development Department
5:\\s\effidaVllPasli^6.d^c