The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About05/25/2021PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ______________________________________________ May 25, 2021 6:30 PM Diamond Bar City Hall – Windmill Community Room 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 PUBLIC ADVISORY: Consistent to the Governor’s Executive Order, members of the public are encouraged to participate and address the Planning Commission during the public comment portion of the meeting via teleconference. Members of the Planning Commission and limited staff may be physically present for this meeting. Public seating is very limited at this time due to distancing requirements and is on a first-come, first-serve basis. If you would like to attend the meeting in person, please note that face coverings are required to be worn at all times and social distancing maintained at all times while in the building. COVID-19 safety screening procedures will be in place requiring the completion of a questionnaire and temperature check prior to entering the room. _______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ How to Observe the Meeting from Home: Members of the public can observe the meeting by calling +1 (562) 247 -8321 , Access Code: 513-529-266 or visiting https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/5279283505627737611 . How to Submit Public Comment: Members of the public may provide public comment by sending written comments to the Minutes Secretary by email at Planning@DiamondBarCA.gov by 5:30 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Please indicate in the Subject Line “FOR PUBLIC COMMENT.” Written comments will be distributed to the Planning Commission members and read into the record at the meeting, up to a maximum of five minutes. Alternatively, public comment may be submitted by logging onto the meeting through this link: https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/5279283505627737611 . Members of the public will be called upon one at a time during the Public Comment portion of the agenda. Speakers are limited to five minutes per agenda item, unless the Chairperson determines otherwise. Accommodations for Persons with Disabilities: Pursuant to the Executive Order, and in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in the Planning Commission Meeting, please contact the Community Development Department at (909) 839-7030 within 72 hours of the meeting. Commission recordings will be available upon request the day following the Planning Commission Meeting. CHAIRPERSON WILLIAM RAWLINGS VICE CHAIRPERSON MAHENDRA GARG COMMISSIONER NAILA BARLAS COMMISSIONER KENNETH MOK COMMISSIONER RAYMOND WOLFE City of Diamond Bar Planning Commission MEETING RULES PUBLIC INPUT Members of the public may address the Planning Commission on any item of busines s on the agenda during the time the item is taken up by the Planning Commission. In addition, members of the public may, during the Public Comment period address the Planning Commission on any Consent Calendar item or any matter not on the agenda and with in the Planning Commission’s subject matter jurisdiction. Any material to be submitted to the Planning Commission at the meeting should be submitted through the Minutes Secretary. Speakers are limited to five minutes per agenda item, unless the Chairperso n determines otherwise. The Chairperson may adjust this time limit depending on the number of people wishing to speak, the complexity of the matter, the length of the agenda, the hour and a ny other relevant consideration. Speakers may address the Planning Commission only once on an agenda item, except during public hearings, when the applicant/appellant may be afforded a rebuttal. Public comments must be directed to the Planning Commission. Behavior that disrupts the orderly conduct of the meeting may result in the speaker being removed from the meeting. INFORMATION RELATING TO AGENDAS AND ACTIONS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Agendas for regular Planning Commission meetings are available 7 2 hours prior to the meeting and are posted in the City’s regular posting locations and on the City’s website at www.diamondbarca.gov. The Planning Commission may take action on any item listed on the agenda. Copies of staff reports or other written documentation relating to agenda items are on file in the Planning Division of the Community Development Department, located at 21810 Copley Drive, and are available for public inspection upon request. If you have questions regarding an agenda item, please call (909) 839-7030 during regular business hours. HELPFUL CONTACT INFORMATION Copies of Agenda, Rules of the Planning Commission, Recordings of Meetings (909) 839-7030 Email: info@diamondbarca.gov Website: www.diamondbarca.gov The City of Diamond Bar thanks you in advance for taking all precautions to prevent spreading the COVID-19 virus. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR PLANNING COMMISSION May 25, 2021 AGENDA Next Resolution No. 2021-06 CALL TO ORDER: 6:30 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: 1. ROLL CALL: COMMISSIONERS: Naila Barlas, Kenneth Mok, Raymond Wolfe, Vice Chairperson Mahendra Garg, Chairperson William Rawlings 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Chairperson 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS: "Public Comments" is the time reserved on each regular meeting agenda to provide an opportunity for members of the public to directly address the Planning Commission on consent calendar items or other matters of interest not on the agenda that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the council. Although the Planning Commission values your comments, pursuant to the brown act, members of the Planning Commission or staff may briefly respond to public comments if necessary, but no extended discussion and no action on suc h matters may take place. There is a five -minute maximum time limit when addressing the Planning Commission. Please complete a speaker card and hand it to the Minutes Secretary (completion of this form is voluntary). The city will call on in person speakers first and then teleconference callers, one at a time to give their name and if there is an agenda item number they wish to speak on before providing their comment. If you wish to speak on a public hearing item or Planning Commission consideration item , you will then be called upon to speak at that point in the agenda. 4. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following items listed on the consent calendar are considered routine and are approved by a single motion. Consent calendar items may be removed from the agenda by request of the Planning Commission only: 4.1 Minutes of the City Council and Planning Commission Special Joint Meeting - April 16, 2021 4.2. Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting – April 27, 2021 MAY 25, 2021 PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION 5. OLD BUSINESS: None 6. NEW BUSINESS: 6.1 Review Of Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) - Conformity with the General Plan. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution (Attachment A) finding the proposed Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Capital Improvement Program in conformance with the General Plan. 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 7.1 Development Review and Tree Permit Planning Case No. PL2020-49 - Under the authority of Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Sections 22.48 and 22.38, the applicant, Pete Volbeda, and property owner, Ken Truong, are requesting Development Review approval for the demolition of an existing single-family residence to construct a new 10,652 square-foot single-family residence, 1,512 square feet of garage and storage areas and 2,224 square feet of patio/balcony areas on a 0.7 gross acre (29,070 gross square-foot) site. A Tree Permit is also requested to remove one protected coast live oak tree and one California sycamore tree that are in fair/poor health and replace with six coast live oak trees on site. The subject property is zoned Rural Residenti al (RR) with an underlying General Plan land use designation of Rural Residential. PROJECT ADDRESS: 2523 Blaze Trail Diamond Bar, CA 91765 PROPERTY OWNER: Ken Truong 1712 Pass and Covina Rd West Covina, CA 91792 APPLICANT: Pete Volbeda 164 N 2nd Ave, Suite 100 Upland, CA 91786 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on that assessment, the City has determined the project to be Categorically E xempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to Article 19 under Section 15303 (a) (new construction of a single-family residence) of the CEQA Guidelines. No further environmental review is required. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution (Attachment A) approving Development Revi ew No. PL2020-49, based on the findings of DBMC Section 22.48, subject to conditions. MAY 25, 2021 PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION 8. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS / INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 9. STAFF COMMENTS / INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 10. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: 11. ADJOURNMENT: MEMORIAL DAY HOLIDAY: Monday, May 31, 2021 In observance of the holiday, city offices will be closed. City offices will re-open on Tuesday, June 1, 2021 CITY COUNCIL MEETING: Tuesday, June 1, 2021, 6:30 pm PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: Tuesday, June 8, 2021, 6:30 pm CITY COUNCIL MEETING: Tuesday, June 15, 2021, 6:30 pm PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: Tuesday, June 22, 2021, 6:30 pm FOURTH OF JULY HOLIDAY: Monday, July 5, 2021 In observance of the holiday, city offices will be closed. City offices will re-open on Tuesday, July 6, 2021 TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING: Thursday, July 8, 2021, 6:30 pm PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING: Thursday, July 22, 2021, 6:30 pm CITY OF DIAMOND BAR MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION SPECIAL JOINT MEETING April 16, 2021 CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Lyons called the Special Joint Meeting of the City Council and Planning Commission to order at 3:35 p.m. Mayor Lyons announced that consistent with COVID-19 regulations, all Council Members and staff participated via teleconference and there was no physical location for public attendance. The Public was invited to join the meeting online or by phone at the numbers printed on the agenda. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Lyons led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Andrew Chou, Stan Liu, Steve Tye, Mayor Pro Tem Ruth Low, and Mayor Nancy Lyons ABSENT: None PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Naila Barlas, Kenneth Mok, Raymond Wolfe, and Chairperson William Rawlings ABSENT: Commissioner Mahendra Garg Staff participating telephonically: Dan Fox, City Manager; Ryan McLean, Assistant City Manager; Anthony Santos, Assistant to the City Manager; Greg Gubman, Community Development Director; Grace Lee, Senior Planner; Mayuko Nakajima, Associate Planner; Joy Tsai, Associate Planner; Stella Marquez, Administrative Coordinator; Marsha Roa, Public Information Manager; Cecilia Arellano, Public Information Coordinator; Kristina Santana, City Clerk Also Present: Marty Borko, Executive Director, ULI Los Angeles and TAP panel members Andrew Fogg, Chairman; Roland Wiley; Jorge Mutis; John Zimmerman, John Wardy, Derek Wyatt, Jennifer Pehr, Jennifer Smith, Matt Romero, Ashley Atkinson, Roger Sanchez, Steve Nelson, and Traffic Consultant, Paul Herrmann. 1. PRESENTATION BY THE URBAN LAND INSTITUTE LOS ANGELES DISTRICT COUNCIL: DIAMOND BAR TOWN CENTER TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PANEL (TAP) RECOMMENTATIONS: CDD/Gubman reported that staff invited ULI-LA to assemble a Technical Assistance Panel (TAP) to provide expert and objective advice on strategies for implementing the General Plan’s Goals and Policies for the future Town Center. 4.1 Packet Pg. 6 _____________________________________________________________________ APRIL 16, 2021 PAGE 2 CC/PC JOINT SPECIAL MTG _____________________________________________________________________ During the week the panel conducted an intensive examination of the study area and will share its insights through a series of presentations by experts in a variety of land use disciplines. He introduced Marty Borko, Executive Director, ULI Los Angeles who, along with Diamond Bar TAP members, provided an overview of their examination of the Town Center Mixed Use study area and recommendations for product component potential. CC/Santana read the following public comments submitted via email: Diane Reisz wanted to know information about the development and how the project will be paid for. Public Comments provided telephonically: Lee Paulson thanked ULI for an amazing presentation and encouraged the City Council, Planning Commissioners and residents, to talk about town building and creation of an urban village and to make a plan and hold on to the vision. Responsible Land Use has no issue with the proposed densities if done properly. Paul Deibel agreed with Lee Paulson that it was an excellent and thorough presentation. He especially likes placement of residential housing to the south of the development and believes the City Council would be well-advised to follow these recommendations as a program for a focal village pedestrian -oriented development of the Town Center Mixed-Use area and he does not believe the community should be overly concerned or afraid of higher density if done properly, which may require additional incentives of affordable housing or fees in lieu. Mayor Lyons asked the Planning Commission and City Council to offer questions or comments at this time. C/Barlas was extremely excited to receive this presentation for potential development that she feels will allow family members to remain in Diamond Bar and hoped she would live to see the project unfold. C/Wolfe felt the presentation was very well thought out. He participated in a workshop earlier in the week during which a conversation about traffic calming measures took place and wondered if TAP had considered traffic calming measures for Diamond Bar Boulevard and whether the SR57/60 Confluence Project might help to mitigate some of those concerns. Andrew Fogg responded that the panel recommended enhanced pedestrian crosswalks across Diamond Bar Boulevard while recognizing that making major changes to arterials proximate to the freeway might be a bit beyond the scope of what this project 4.1 Packet Pg. 7 _____________________________________________________________________ APRIL 16, 2021 PAGE 3 CC/PC JOINT SPECIAL MTG _____________________________________________________________________ could tackle so they focused on the internal circulation in not creating additional gridlock within the City. Paul Herrmann, P.E., Fehr & Peers, further responded to C/Wolfe that the focus was an attempt to balance capacity on Diamond Bar Boulevard with safety for bikes and pedestrians using the facility, as well as those crossing the street. He supports the “complete streets” concept and might have recommendations for increased widths for pedestrian facilities while retaining six lanes, that would include protected bike lanes and sidewalks along Diamond Bar Boulevard with decreased roadway widths, which would slow speeds in combination with increased pedestrian activity. C/Wolfe stated that with respect to the discussion about the cost of creating the parking necessary for this to succeed (between $80 -135 million), he saw Diamond Bar as a transit desert and many of the examples drawn upon in putting this presentation together looked at areas that had significantly more advanced transit options available. As Diamond Bar continues to grow and looks to meet the RHNA requirements, the community needs to think about how it can provide more options for alternative transportation to community members, as well as those who travel through the community. C/Mok was surprised to hear about the redevelopment cycle of 30 years and the time it would take to accomplish this huge project. Like C/Barlas and M/Lyons, he also hopes to be around if this plan comes to fruition. He liked the idea of warming up the community to food trucks, pop-up events, movie nights, etc., to monitor the interest of residents in wanting to gather in a common area. He asked about the feasibility of a bridge joining the east and west portions of the project (Sprouts Center with Smart & Final Center). Andrew Fogg responded that the possibility of a pedestrian bridge was discussed and the panel recognized that there were impediments depending on how and when the structures were being built on the east and west because the span is quite long. In addition, the nature and elevation of the uses limit the ability to include such a structure in the recommendations at this time due to cost concerns and how it would be coordinated with the challenges of control of development under different property ownerships. C/Mok asked if there was consideration of a particular monument as an essential focal point of the Town Center, and was there discussion about a small community theater. Mr. Fogg responded that the theater was not specifically discussed by the panel. However, the panel believes that any kind of community spaces are important to the mix. Jennifer Smith said she believes there is an opportunity for an art program and wholeheartedly agrees that any area along the public realm offers a great opportunity to infuse art and send out receptors in the community to compare with local artists and institutions such as Cal Poly 4.1 Packet Pg. 8 _____________________________________________________________________ APRIL 16, 2021 PAGE 4 CC/PC JOINT SPECIAL MTG _____________________________________________________________________ Pomona to infuse a local art program and encourage local participation. Any element that enhances a community gathering spot is definitely part of the vision. Chair/Rawlings agreed with C/Mok that the district idea is a great idea and understands that communities have had great success introducing night markets drawing attention to centers that have been underutilized and found it interesting and encouraging that parking was integrated with the housing projects. He asked for more in-depth information about how the panel would propose to accommodate pedestrian traffic across Diamond Bar Boulevard. M/Lyons asked how safe crosswalks proved to be at the Broad museum in downtown Los Angeles. Jorge Mutis responded that despite the size of the roadway, there is a lot of activity on both sides and because of the amount of pedestrian traffic, vehicular traffic cannot speed. In this case, because there is so much pedestrian traffic predicted between the sites, widening and highlighting of the crosswalk would enhance the safety. C/Liu said he appreciated the presentation that draws parallels to other cities’ mixed use areas. He wanted to know more about the type of outreach and information gathering the City would seek from stakeholders. Andrew Fogg responded that ULI is a non-profit organization that brings together folks to assist on panels such as this and works with the City to address the scope of work and series of questions. Initially, the panel engaged with CDD/Gubman and CM/Fox and CDD/Gubman’s team put together a list of folks to interview that included individuals from the City Council and Planning Commission, major property owners both large and small within the site, community stakeholders , regional players and community members, each of whom were invited to five one-hour sessions over the course of an afternoon as they were interviewed by various panel members and engaged in discussion. C/Chou agreed the presentation was great and looked forward to the work ahead. Considering there are some 24 property owners involved C/Chou asked what steps other cities have taken to compel property owners to go along with the ir vision. Andrew Fogg said that creating a great plan is important and based on the information in the briefing book, it appeared that at least a couple of the owners have expressed interest in exploring this vision. This led the panel members to believe that the Phase One starting point might be a good place from which to work. Ashley Atkinson responded that one of her questions to the development members of the team was “what would make you participate in this project” and ultimately, it comes down to financials. The 30-year timeline is an estimate for every property in the Town Center to potentially turn over. Certainly, there are many things that can be done on a shorter timeline, but for full development of a 45-acre site that is controlled by multiple different entities, it will take time. 4.1 Packet Pg. 9 _____________________________________________________________________ APRIL 16, 2021 PAGE 5 CC/PC JOINT SPECIAL MTG _____________________________________________________________________ C/Tye referred to slide 30 and said he loved how Mr. Paulson began by referring to this as the “town building” because C/Tye believes this is the opportunity for Diamond Bar to get it right and not use short-term thinking. Diamond Bar has a hodgepodge of development and his vision for the Town Center area would be to flatten everything from Golden Springs Drive to the SR60 and from Diamond Bar Boulevard to Palomino Drive, save the condos, and start over. When he looks at slide 30 and hears the reference to start with a willing developer in Phase One, how then does the City prevent a hodgepodge of development and how then does the City make it look like it belongs here and how does the City avoid Grand Avenue and Diamond Bar Boulevard with a bank on a corner and offices on top hidden from view. As one travels south there is a Pollo Loco and Mr. G’s Pizza and also hidden from view is India Palace and other businesses in the area. If one starts with a willing developer, how does the City make it look like this proposed spectacular plan and grand idea? Ashley Atkinson responded that this is where the City’s General Plan comes into play and should contain design standards that dictate the appearance of what goes in to the Town Center, not necessarily dictate specific uses in specific places. There will always be a boundary and she does not know that any Planning Department get s everything specifically right within the given parameters, but that is how the City would achieve a more consistent look even if the development occurs overtime and with different ownership. In addition, she would suggest that the Specific Plan not be so flexible that it would allow for just anything. There needs to be review conducted by staff that a specific site proposal meets the intent of the Specific Plan and how that is structured is up to the City and its Community Development staff. C/Tye thanked the panel for their exciting presentation. MPT/Low referred to a slide that compared the current state of the City and what would be allowed under the General Plan , and what is projected under a higher density plan, and asked for clarification that the proposal is that the City provide a Specific Plan geared toward the potential market alternative. Andrew Fogg responded that the panel used current developments under multiple ownership and the slide explores the amount of parking area that would be required if the City kept the residential at 900 units and backfilled with a 1.5 FAR (nearly 7,000 parking spaces), much of which does not offer the opportunity for the wrapped or public parking. The purpose of this slide was to illustrate that the FAR of 1.5 can remain if there is a feasible project that gets the City to 1 .5 and provides for flexibility; and, at the 1,500 versus 900, what the residential density is and how that plays in and how those parking facilities would be managed and what would be provided. So as the City moves forward in the Specific Plan programming, it should make sure the proposals are detailed enough that the City has certainty it will get the amenities it wants allowing the City to respond to market conditions over time and the feasibility that there will be enough funding in this project , both 4.1 Packet Pg. 10 _____________________________________________________________________ APRIL 16, 2021 PAGE 6 CC/PC JOINT SPECIAL MTG _____________________________________________________________________ on the public side and the private side, to make sure that the improvements can be constructed. MPT/Low said that in her opinion, this presents a concept of a Town Center on steroids instead of the Town Center that was presented two years ago , which is fine if that is what the community wants. She asked if the p anel considered including photos of Town Centers that better replicate what it has in mind in terms of the density proposed such as the development in the Yorba Linda/Placentia area that would correspond to what is being proposed. And, did the panel consider showing the community what that looks like and penciling that out in terms of infrastructure. Mr. Fogg said the slides shown included projects that were similar in size and density and it is important to keep in mind that the TAP is working with the information available and in a relatively limited amount of time and many of these questions can be explored further during the Specific Plan process. The panel was responding to the questions put forward by the City and challenging some of the assumptions including the assumption that this is the right amount to provide a project that works, that is financially feasible, and that the City be able to make these improvements with the development community that owns the site. Tonight’s presentation was intended to challenge some of the thinking and give the community something to think about and ways to think through the Specific Plan moving forward. MPT/Low asked what would happen to the City’s infrastructure services with the addition of 1,500 units and who would provide these answers in order to put together a feasible plan moving forward. Andrew Fogg reiterated that this is not within the scope of the TAP report, rather an iterative process with Planning staff and the community as the Specific Plan is developed. MPT/Low commented that the concepts are great and creative showing a step from the lower to higher elevation as a good use of natural topography. She agreed with the questions and discussion about the community spaces and believes more such discussions are necessary, especially since the City is contemplating bringing in 900 to 1,500 new families into an area where they will need open space. She thanked TAP for an excellent presentation. M/Lyons echoed comments of the Commission and Council that this is a very exciting and beautiful presentation that includes many things the public has been asking for. She asked how many units are included in Phase One and Andrew Fogg responded that he would estimate 200 to 300 units and Jennifer Smith said that retail would comprise approximately 19,000 square feet on the left and 14,000 square feet on the right and most of the building would be residential. Mr. Fogg emphasized the importance of putting together a Specific Plan that is clear and executable. M/Lyons agreed. 4.1 Packet Pg. 11 _____________________________________________________________________ APRIL 16, 2021 PAGE 7 CC/PC JOINT SPECIAL MTG _____________________________________________________________________ CM/Fox felt this was an incredible exercise and thanked Andrew Fogg and panelists for their efforts. This was a very high-level visioning session and the City has a lot of work ahead of it in putting together a Specific Plan an d working with property owners to figure out what development will look like. M/Lyons thanked the panel and staff. ADJOURNMENT: With no further business to conduct, M/Lyons adjourned the Joint City Council/Planning Commission Special Meeting at 5:48 p.m. Respectfully submitted: ______________________________ Kristina Santana, City Clerk The foregoing minutes are hereby approved this ___ day of _____, 2021. ____________________________ Nancy Lyons, Mayor ____________________________ William Rawlings, Planning Commission Chairperson 4.1 Packet Pg. 12 MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 27, 2021 CONSISTENT WITH THE GOVERNOR’S LATEST EXECUTIVE ORDER TO STAY AT HOME, AVOID GATHERINGS, AND MAINTAIN SOCIAL DISTANCING, THIS MEETING WAS CONDUCTED TELEPHONICALLY AND PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, CITY STAFF, AND MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC PARTICIPATED VIA TELECONFERENCE. CALL TO ORDER: Chair/Rawlings called the meeting to order at 6:31 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Commissioner Wolfe led the Pledge of Allegiance. 1. ROLL CALL: Commissioners: Kenneth Mok, Raymond Wolfe, Vice Chairman Mahendra Garg, Chairman William Rawlings. Absent: Commissioner Naila Barlas Staff participating telephonically: Greg Gubman, Community Development Director; Dave DeBerry, City Attorney; Grace Lee, Senior Planner; Mayuko (May) Nakajima, Associate Planner; Stella Marquez, Administrative Coordinator 2. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: None 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: As presented 4. CONSENT CALENDAR: 4.1 Minutes of the Regular Planning Commission Meeting of March 23, 2021. C/Mok moved, VC/Garg seconded to approve the meeting minutes of March 23, 2021 as presented. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Mok, Wolfe, VC/Garg, Chair/Rawlings NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Barlas 5. OLD BUSINESS: None 6. NEW BUSINESS: None 4.2 Packet Pg. 13 ________________________________________________________________________ APRIL 27, 2021 PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION ________________________________________________________________________ 7. PUBLIC HEARING(S): 7.1 Development Review Planning Case No. PL2020-115 – Under the authority of Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.48, the property owner requested Development Review approval to construct a 1,224 square-foot addition, 399 square-foot patio cover, 106 square-foot front porch and, a 351 square- foot detached recreation room to an existing single-story, single-family residence. The subject property is zoned Low Residential (RL) with an underlying General Plan land use designation of Low Residential. PROJECT ADDRESS: 24206 Gingerwood Place Diamond Bar, CA 91765 PROPERTY OWNER: Brian and Michelle Lear 24206 Gingerwood Place Diamond Bar, CA APPLICANT: Angelo Reginaldo 23502 Grand Rim Court Diamond Bar, CA 91765 AP/Nakajima presented staff’s report and recommended that the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution approving Development Review No. PL2020-115, based on the findings of Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Section 22.48, subject to conditions. Chair/Rawlings opened the public hearing. Angelo Reginaldo, Civil Engineer, was available to respond to questions and concerns. Chair/Rawlings closed the public hearing. C/Mok felt the project made great use of available space without having to build up. Chair/Rawlings and VC/Garg agreed. C/Mok moved, C/Wolfe seconded, to adopt the Resolution approving Development Review No. PL2020-115, based on the findings of Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Section 22.48, subject to conditions. Motion c arried by the following Roll Call vote: 4.2 Packet Pg. 14 ________________________________________________________________________ APRIL 27, 2021 PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION ________________________________________________________________________ AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Wolfe, Mok, VC/Garg Chair/Rawlings NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Barlas 8. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: C/Mok found the information provided by the TAP during the Commission’s joint meeting with City Council was very complete and informative and he looked forward to the next steps in the process. Chair/Rawlings felt the joint meeting was very helpful and informative and encouraged everyone who had not joined in the meeting to review the recording to better understand the proposal. He asked everyone to please continue to shop in Diamond Bar and support businesses as they begin the reopening process. 9. STAFF COMMENTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: CDD/Gubman reported that there are no agenda items for May 11 and the next Planning Commission meeting is planned to be an in-person meeting on May 25 in the Windmill Room at City Hall. 10. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: As listed in the agenda. ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Planning Commission, Chair/Rawlings adjourned the regular meeting at 6:48 p.m. The foregoing minutes are hereby approved this 25th of May, 2021. Attest: Respectfully Submitted, _______________________________________ Greg Gubman, Community Development Director _______________________________ William Rawlings, Chairperson 4.2 Packet Pg. 15 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 6.1 MEETING DATE: May 25, 2021 CASE/FILE NUMBER: Capital Improvement Program (CIP) FY2021- 2022 BACKGROUND: Each year, prior to the adoption of the City’s annual budget, the Planning Commission reviews the proposed fiscal year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for consistency with the City’s General Plan and adopts a resolution to record its findings. The process is mandated pursuant to California Government Code Section 65401 (see Attachment 2). ANALYSIS: The proposed FY2021-2022 CIP is detailed in Attachment 4, and is comprised of the following expenditures: CIP FY2021-2022 Expenditures • Street Improvements $3,506,394 • Traffic Management/Safety Improvements $51,000 • Transportation Infrastructure Improvements $1,045,000 • Miscellaneous Public Works Improvements $1,986,359 • Facilities, Parks and Rec. Improvements $938,283 Total: $7,527,036 These capital improvement projects are funded by various sources: General Fund, Measure W, Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (SB -1); Measure M; Measure R, Gas Tax, Proposition A; Proposition C; SB 821 Fund – Bike and Pedestrian Paths (TDA); AB 2766; Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds; Hauler Fees; Quimby Fund; Measure A; Park Development; Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee (MRSC) Grant; Building and Facilities Maintenance Fund; FEMA; CalOES; Foothill Transit Grant; and Habitat Conservation Grant. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ~ 21810 COPLEY DRIVE ~ DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 ~ TEL. (909) 839-7030 ~ FAX (909) 861-3117 6.1 Packet Pg. 16 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) FY2021-2022 Page 2 of 6 The Public Works Department develops the project list based on identified community improvement needs. Planning staff finds that the proposed FY2021 -2022 CIP is consistent with the adopted General Plan 2040’s numerous Goals and Policies, including, but not limited to, the following: • Land Use & Economic Development Element ➢ Policy LU-P-14 ➢ Policy LU-P-51 • Community Character & Placemaking Element ➢ Policy CC-P-4 ➢ Policy CC-P-64 • Circulation Element ➢ Policy CR-P-1 ➢ Policy CR-P-20 ➢ Policy CR-P-26 ➢ Policy CR-P-36 ➢ Policy CR-P-48 • Resource Conservation Element ➢ Goal RC-G-2 ➢ Goal RC-G-3 ➢ Goal RC-G-7 ➢ Policy RC-P-5 ➢ Policy RC-P-22 • Public Facilities & Services Element ➢ Policy PF-P-18 6.1 Packet Pg. 17 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) FY2021-2022 Page 3 of 6 • Public Safety Element ➢ Goal PS-G-12 ➢ Policy PS-P-51 • Community Health & Sustainability Element ➢ Policy CHS-P-38 ➢ Policy CHS-P-41 The full text of the above Goals and Policies are provided in the attached Resolution. Capital Improvement Projects Below is a summary of the various projects proposed under the FY2021 -2022 CIP: Street Improvement Projects Road Maintenance Projects – Grind and overlay, slurry seal or chip seal maintenance is applied to designated roadways within the City. This type of maintenance activity is applied annually to residential streets and arterial roadways on an eight -year cycle per neighborhood to extend the life of the existing road pavement; and the appropriate pavement markings are re-established (see Attachment 3). Road Maintenance improvements also include curb ramp upgrades with sidewalk, curb and gutter repairs as necessary. o Arterial Street Rehabilitation Diamond Bar Blvd. (Pathfinder to Mountain Laurel) - Construction is expected to be completed in July 2021. The work will include the complete rehabilitation of Diamond Bar Blvd. Based on existing pavement conditions, it is likely the treatment will include AC edge grind or full width overlay and ADA curb ramp improvements. Construction is expected to be completed in July 2021. This is a carryover project from FY2020-2021). o Residential & Collectors Rehabilitation – Areas 1 and 2, and Arterial Street Rehabilitation – Golden Springs (Diamond Bar Blvd. from Pathfinder to Mountain Laurel) (Golden Springs from Brea Canyon to Lemon) (Golden Springs from Grand to Brea Canyon Road) (Design). The work includes working with Civil Engineering firm to design the street improvement plans for the next three years for residential and arterial streets. The locations are prioritized using the City’s latest Pavement Management Plan. Construction is expected to be completed in November 2021. This is a carryover project from FY2020-2021. o CDBG Area 2 ADA Curb Ramp Project – This project will rehabilitate existing curb ramps and install new curb ramps that meet the latest Federal ADA 6.1 Packet Pg. 18 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) FY2021-2022 Page 4 of 6 Compliance Standards within the boundaries of Area 2. Construction is e xpected to be completed in February 2022. This is a new project for FY2021-2022. o Residential & Collector Street Rehabilitation – Area 1. The work includes the application of slurry seal over the existing pavement and AC edge grind and overlay. This type of maintenance activity is performed annually to residential streets to extend the life of the roadways. Construction is expected to be completed in November 2021. This is a new project for FY2021-2022. o Arterial Street Rehabilitation (Golden Springs from Brea Canyon to Lemon) – The work will include the complete rehabilitation of Golden Springs Drive from Brea Canyon Road to Lemon Avenue. Based on existing pavement conditions, it is likely the treatment will include AC edge grind or full width overlay and ADA curb ramp improvements. Construction is expected to be completed in November 2021. This is a new project for FY2021-2022. Traffic Management/Safety Projects o Battery Backup and CCTV Replacement Program – To protect against black-outs at signalized intersections during a power loss, this project will replace the edge equipment that was originally installed in 2008 and 2011. This is the first phase of a five year replacement program. Construction is expected to be completed in March 2022. This is a new project for FY2021-2022. Transportation Infrastructure Improvements • Lemon Avenue Quiet Zone – A quiet zone is a section of rail line, at least one-half mile in length, that contains one or more consecutive public highway/rail grade crossings where the use of train horns near the crossings is either eliminated or reduced. The Lemon Avenue railroad crossing owned by the Union Pacific Railroad Company (UPRR) and used by Southern California Regional Rail Road Authority (Metrolink) is to be studied in mutual effort between the City of Diamond Bar and City of Industry for a quiet zone designation. Train horns may be sounded in emergency situations or to comply with Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) rules, which require that locomotive horns be sounded 15-20 seconds before entering public highway/rail grade crossings, no more than one-quarter mile in advance, even within a quiet zone. The study is anticipated to be completed by December 2021. This is a carryover project from FY2020-2021. • Bus Shelter Replacements at Golden Springs Road and Calbourne Drive –The City will capitalize on the Foothill Transit’s Bus Stop Enhancement Program (BSEP) grant to replace the existing bus shelters and amenities in March 2022. Construction is expected to be completed in March 2022. This is a carryover project for FY2020-2021. 6.1 Packet Pg. 19 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) FY2021-2022 Page 5 of 6 • Citywide Bus Shelter Replacement Program – This project replaces all shelter structures, benches and trash bins Citywide. The construction is estimated to be completed by March 2022. This is a new project for FY2021-2022. Miscellaneous Public Works Improvements • Grand/Golden Springs Intersection Enhancements – As part of the required mitigation improvements for the development north of the 57/60 confluence area, the intersection of Grand Ave. and Golden Springs Drive will be widened by the City of Industry. In conjunction with the widening of the intersection, Diamond Bar will implement landscape and hardscape elements with decorative traffic signals, crosswalks and enhanced parkway landscape that have been incorporated at the Grand Ave/Diamond Bar Blvd., Grand Ave./Longview Dr. and Diamond Bar Blvd./Brea Canyon Road intersections. The construction is estimated to be completed by February 2023. This is a carryover project from FY2020 -2021. • Electric Charging Station at City Hall—This project will install an electric vehicle charging station at City Hall to be available for City electric vehicles and the public when possible. The project is being funded by Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee (MSRC) funds and a match from SCAQMD AB2766 funds. The construction is estimated to be completed by July 2021. This is a carryover project from FY2020-2021. • Groundwater Drainage Improvements Phase 3 (Flapjack) – In FY2014-15, a Comprehensive Groundwater Drainage Study was completed identifying and evaluating various roadway locations with groundwater conditions that warrant drainage improvements. In the upcoming year, the drainage system for Flapjack Drive (Phase 3) will be designed and constructed, contingent on the receipt of Measure W funds. Design will include adding inlets and storm drain laterals to provide for conveyance of groundwater into existing storm drain systems. The design is estimated to be completed by November 2021 and construction is estimated to be completed by March 2022. This is a new project for FY2021 -2022. Facility, Parks and Recreation Improvements • Design and Construction of Canyon Loop Trail – A 1,29 mile trail in the open space adjacent to the Diamond Bar Center that can be accessed from the Grandview Trail and the Steep Canyon Trail needs extensive improvements. Design is scheduled for completion by October 202 and construction is estimated to be completed by December 2021. This is a carryover project from FY2020- 2021. • Sycamore Canyon Creek Repair—During the 2017 storm event, Sycamore Canyon Creek within Sycamore Canyon Park experienced severe erosion. To prevent further erosion, repairs to the creek lining will be performed. The project 6.1 Packet Pg. 20 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) FY2021-2022 Page 6 of 6 is expected to be completed in September 2021. This is a carryover project from FY2020-2021. • DBC AC Replacement & Air Quality Upgrades (Design)—The project is to design a new HVAC system to replace the current system at the Diamond Bar Center and improve the indoor air quality. The project is expected to be completed in April 2022. This is a new project for FY2021-2022. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2021 -XX finding the proposed FY2021-2022 Capital Improvement Program in conformance with the City’s General Plan. PREPARED BY: REVIEWED BY: Attachments: A. Draft Resolution No. 2021-XX B. California Government Code Section 65401 C. Slurry Seal Residential and Arterial Street Moratorium Map D. FY2020-2021 Capital Improvement Program Project List 6.1 Packet Pg. 21 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT THE PROPOSED FISCAL YEAR 2021-2022 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) IS CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65401. A. RECITALS 1. WHEREAS, on April 18, 1989, the City of Diamond Bar was established as a duly organized municipal corporation of the State of California. 2. WHEREAS, on July 25, 1995, the City of Diamond Bar adopted its General Plan incorporating all State mandated elements, and portions of the General Plan have been updated from time to time. 3. WHEREAS, on December 17, 2019, the City of Diamond Bar adopted its comprehensive update of the General Plan (“General Plan 2040”). 4. WHEREAS, the City Manager of the City of Diamond Bar has prepared a proposed Capital Improvement Program and Budget for the City’s 2021-2022 Fiscal Year which outlines a program identifying proposed public works improvement projects to occur during the fiscal year. The projects include, but are not limited to, street and highway improvements, traffic signal modifications, and park improvements. 5. WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 65401 requires the Planning Commission to review proposed public works projects for the ensuing fiscal year to determine compliance with the City’s General Plan. 6. WHEREAS, on May 25, 2021, at a regularly scheduled meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed and considered the City of Diamond Bar’s proposed Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Capital Improvement Program, and the projects contained therein, and concluded said review prior to the adoption of this Resolution. B. RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: 1. This Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the facts and evidence presented during the Planning Commission meeting regarding the City’s proposed Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Capital Improvement Program, including oral and documentary evidence provided by City staff, and in accordance with the provisions of California Government Code Section 65401, the Planning Commission hereby finds as follows: 6.1.a Packet Pg. 22 2 PC Resolution No. 2021-XX (a) The projects identified in the City’s proposed Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Capital Improvement Program, are consistent with the City’s General Plan 2040’s numerous goals and policies adopted December 17, 2019, including, but not limited to, the following: (i) Land Use & Economic Development Element • Policy LU-P-14 – Improve vehicular accessibility, traffic flow, and parking availability as well as pedestrian and bicycle access and amenities within office, commercial, and industrial areas. • Policy LU-P-51 – Provide streetscape and intersection improvements along Golden Springs Drive to enhance comfort and safety for all modes of travel and increase accessibility to and from surrounding areas. (ii) Community Character & Placemaking Element • Policy CC-P-4 – Continue to support community identity with streetscape improvement and beautification projects in both existing residential areas and commercial centers, as well as new mixed-use areas that incorporate unified landscaping and pedestrian amenities. Amenities should include seating, bus shelters, pedestrian safety treatments such as sidewalk bulb- outs and widening and improved crosswalks, and city-branded decorative elements such as street lighting, concrete pavers, tree grates, and theme rails. • Policy CC-P-64 – Provide streetscape and intersection improvements along Golden Springs Drive to enhance comfort and safety for all modes of travel and increase accessibility to and from surrounding areas. (iii) Circulation Element • Policy CR-P-1 – When redesigning streets, plan for the needs of different modes by incorporating elements such as shade for pedestrians, safe pedestrian-friendly crossings/intersections, lighting at the pedestrian scale, bike lanes, signage visible to relevant modes, transit amenities, etc. • Policy CR-P-20 – Implement measures such as additional signal timing and synchronization, speed limit regulations, and ITS techniques to increase safety and reduce congestion. Maintain a pavement management system and maintenance program for all public roadways throughout the City. • Policy CR-P-26 – As opportunities arise, coordinate with other jurisdictions, including neighboring cities, Los Angeles County, San Bernardino County, and Caltrans, on improvements to street 6.1.a Packet Pg. 23 3 PC Resolution No. 2021-XX segments common to the City of Diamond Bar and other jurisdictions. • Policy CR-P-36 – Where appropriate, plant street trees and provide landscaping along major pedestrian and bicycle routes to provide shade and barriers between cyclists and motorists, as well as enhance aesthetics. • Policy CR-P-48 – As opportunities arise, coordinate with Foothill Transit to maintain and improve bus stops and shelters, as well as identify areas where service can be improved or expanded to increase system use. (iv) Resource Conservation Element • Goal RC-G-2 – Seek to link the various elements of the open space network through the development of an integrated system of trails and greenways. • Goal RC-G-3 – Preserve to the extent possible open space ridgelines, hilltops, and prominent slopes for aesthetic, biological and natural resource conservation, and safety purposes. • Policy RC-P-5 – Link parks, open spaces, and regional hiking trails with a trail network where feasible, acknowledging topographical constraints and other barriers. Incorporate existing trails and bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure, working with willing landowners to prioritize land acquisition where necessary. Where possible, incorporate landscaping and enhance natural features to create greenways along the trail network. • Goal RC-G-7 – Protect waterways—including creeks, riverines, artesian springs, seeps, and wetlands—and watersheds in Diamond Bar from pollution and degradation as a result of urban activities. • Policy RC-P-22 – Protect and, where feasible, enhance or restore the City’s waterways and drainages, preventing erosion along the banks, removing litter and debris, and promoting riparian vegetation and buffers. (v) Public Facilities & Services Element • Policy PF-P-18 – Where feasible, link parks, open spaces, and regional hiking trails with a trail network. Incorporate existing trails and bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure, working with willing landowners to prioritize land acquisition where 6.1.a Packet Pg. 24 4 PC Resolution No. 2021-XX necessary. Where possible, incorporate landscaping and enhance natural features. (vi) Public Safety Element • Goal PS-G-12 – Support measures to reduce noise emission by motor vehicles, aircraft, and trains. • Policy PS-P-51 – Coordinate with the Union Pacific Railroad and other agencies and private entities to consider the implementation of a railroad quiet zone and other methods of reducing railroad noise impacts on surrounding noise-sensitive uses along the Union Pacific Railroad line adjacent to the city. (vii) Community Health & Sustainability Element • Policy CHS-P-38 – Promote the adoption of rooftop and parking lot solar power and/or other alternative energy usage on developed sites in Diamond Bar through actions such as: a. Establishing incremental growth goals for solar power/alternative energy systems in Diamond Bar; b. Developing guidelines, recommendations, and examples for cost-effective solar and/or other alternative energy- based installation; and c. Installing solar/alternative energy technology on existing City facilities. • Policy CHS-P-41 – Support the use of clean fuel and “climate friendly” vehicles in order to reduce energy use, energy cost, and greenhouse gas emissions by residents, businesses, and City government activities. (b) The proposed projects comply with all other applicable requ irements of State law and local ordinances, regulations, and standards; and (c) The proposed Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Capital Improvement Program is found to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), under Se ction 15301 of the CEQA Guidelines (operation, repair, maintenance of existing facilities). 3. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth above, this Resolution shall serve as the Planning Commission’s report to the City Council regarding the General Plan conformity of the proposed public works projects in the City’s Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Capital Improvement Program as required by California Government Code Section 65401. 6.1.a Packet Pg. 25 5 PC Resolution No. 2021-XX The Planning Commission shall: (a) Certify as to the adoption of this Resolution; and (b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution to the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar for use in its deliberations regarding the City’s budget. ADOPTED AND APPROVED THIS 25th DAY OF MAY, 2021, BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. ______________________________ William Rawlings, Chairman I, Greg Gubman, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of May, 2021, by the following vote to wit: AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: ABSTAIN: Commissioners: ATTEST: ______________________________ Greg Gubman, Secretary 6.1.a Packet Pg. 26 CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65401 Review of Capital Improvement Projects for Conformity with the General Plan If a general plan or part thereof has been adopted, within such time as may be fixed by the legislative body, each county or city officer, department, board, or commission, and each governmental body, commission, or board, including the governing body of any special district or school district, whose jurisdiction lies wholly or partially within the county or city, whose functions include recommending, preparing plans for, or constructing, major public works, shall submit to the official agency, as designated by the respective county board of supervisors or city council, a list of the proposed public works recommended for planning, initiation or construction during the ensuing fiscal year. The official agency receiving the list of proposed public works shall list and classify all such recommendations and shall prepare a coordinated program of proposed public works for the ensuing fiscal year. Such coordinated program shall be submitted to the county or city planning agency for review and report to said official agency as to conformity with the adopted general plan or part thereof. 6.1.b Packet Pg. 27 ZONE AREA 7* AREA 6* AREA 5 AREA 4 AREA 3 AREA 2 AREA 1B AREA 1A TREATMENT YEAR 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 MORATORIUM* Revised 9-11-2019 NOTE: THIS MAP REPRESENTS RESIDENTIAL AND COLLECTOR STREET MORATORIUMS ONLY. MORATORIUMS ARE PLACED ON STREETS THAT HAVE BEEN RECONSTRUCTED OR SLURRY SEALED AND LAST 2 YEARS AFTER CONSTRUCTION. Arterial Road Moratoriums: Diamond Bar Blvd Between Mountain Laurel Way & Clear Creek Canyon Dr. Note: Blue lines indicate streets that have been SlurrySealed and last 2 years after construction. Green linesshows streets that have been Cape Sealed and last 5years after construction. AREA 1 AREA 2 AREA 3 AREA 4 AREA 5 AREA 6 AREA 7 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR MORATORIUM MAP Slurry Sealed Streets (2 years) Updated: May 2021 ZONE TREATMENT MORATORIUM YEAR END (DECEMBER) AREA 1 2021/22 2023/24 AREA 7 2019 2021 AREA 6 2018 AREA 5 2017 AREA 4 2016 AREA 3 2015 AREA 2 2014 AREA 1 6.1.c Packet Pg. 28 ZONE AREA 7* AREA 6* AREA 5 AREA 4 AREA 3 AREA 2 AREA 1B AREA 1A TREATMENT YEAR 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 MORATORIUM* Revised 9-11-2019 NOTE: THIS MAP REPRESENTS RESIDENTIAL AND COLLECTOR STREET MORATORIUMS ONLY. MORATORIUMS ARE PLACED ON STREETS THAT HAVE BEEN RECONSTRUCTED OR SLURRY SEALED AND LAST 2 YEARS AFTER CONSTRUCTION. Arterial Road Moratoriums: Diamond Bar Blvd Between Mountain Laurel Way & Clear Creek Canyon Dr. Note: Blue lines indicate streets that have been SlurrySealed and last 2 years after construction. Green linesshows streets that have been Cape Sealed and last 5years after construction. AREA 1 AREA 2 AREA 3 AREA 4 AREA 5 AREA 6 AREA 7 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR MORATORIUM MAP Slurry Sealed Streets (2 years) Updated: May 2021 STREET TREATMENT MORATORIUM YEAR END (DECEMBER) DIAMOND BAR BLVD 2019 2024 DIAMOND BAR BLVD 2021 2026 GOLDEN SPRINGS DR 2021 2026 AREA 1 6.1.c Packet Pg. 29 FY 2021/2022 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS BUDGET Exhibit 1a Street Improvement Projects (301610-56101) Project #Old Project #Phase Project Description Status Total FY Budget (202) RMRA (203) Measure M (204) Measure R Local Return (205) Gas Tax (207) Prop C (252) Hauler Fees (225) CDBG SI20100 01420 DESIGN * Residential and Collector Street Rehab.- Area 1, 2 (Design) Arterial Street Rehab (Design) (DBB from Pathfinder to Mountain Laurel) (Golden Springs from Brea Canyon to Lemon) (Golden Springs from Grand to BCY) Carryover - In Design 30,000$ 30,000$ SI20101 02120 CONSTRUCT *Arterial Street Rehab (DBB from Pathfinder to Mountain Laurel Way) (Const.)Carryover - Under Construction 300,000$ 300,000$ SI22102 N/A CONSTRUCT **Residential and Collector Street Rehab - Area 1 (Const.)New 2,100,000$ 1,000,000$ 900,000$ 64,000$ 136,000$ SI22100 N/A CONSTRUCT **Arterial Street Rehab (Golden Springs from Brea Canyon to Lemon Ave.) (Const.)New 900,000$ 400,000$ 500,000$ SI22101 N/A CONSTRUCT **CDBG Area 2 ADA Curb Ramp Project (Const.)New 176,394$ 176,394$ Total - Street Improvement Projects 3,506,394$ 700,000$ 1,030,000$ 900,000$ 64,000$ 500,000$ 136,000$ 176,394$ -$ -$ Traffic Management/Safety Projects (301610-56102) Project #Old Project #Phase Project Description Status Total FY Budget (207) Prop C TM22200 N/A CONSTRUCT Battery Back-Up and CCTV Replacement Program New 51,000$ 51,000$ Total - Traffic Projects 51,000$ 51,000$ Transportation Infrastructure Improvements (310610-56103) Project #Old Project #Phase Project Description Status Total FY Budget (207) Prop C Foothill Transit Grant (45030) (206) Prop A TI18300 23318 DESIGN *Lemon Avenue Quiet Zone Carryover 75,000$ 75,000$ TI20300 23420 CONTRUCT *Bus Shelter Replacement - GSD/Calbourne Carryover 40,000$ 40,000$ TI22300 N/A ALL Citywide Bus Shelter Replacement Program (Design & Construction)New 930,000$ 930,000$ Total-Transportation Infrastructure Improvements 1,045,000$ 75,000$ 40,000$ 930,000$ Miscellaneous PW Improvements (301610-56105) Project #Old Project #Phase Project Description Status Total FY Budget MSRC Grant (43130) (202) RMRA (203) Measure M (207) Prop C (251) AB2766 (209) TDA (201) Measure W PW18400 22818 CONSTRUCT *Grand/GSD Intersection Enhancement (Construction)Carryover - Under Construction 1,402,973$ 876,811$ 207,691$ 217,685$ 100,787$ PW22400 N/A DESIGN **Groundwater Drainage Improvements-Phase 3 (Flapjack-Design)New 77,000$ 77,000$ PW22400 N/A CONSTRUCT **Groundwater Drainage Improvements-Phase 3 (Flapjack-Construction)New 500,000$ 500,000$ PW19400 26319 CONSTRUCT *Electric Charging Station at City Hall Carryover - Under Construction 6,386$ 3,893$ 2,493$ Total-Miscellaneous PW Improvements 1,986,359$ 3,893$ 876,811$ 207,691$ 217,685$ 2,493$ 100,787$ 577,000$ -$ -$ Facilities, Parks and Rec Improvements (301630-56104) Project #Old Project #Phase Project Description Status Total Budget (100) General Fund (260) Quimby (262) Park Development (504) Building & Facilities Fund FEMA (42010) CalOES (42055) Habitat Conserv Grant (43110) (201) Measure W (261) Measure A FP17500 25517 DESIGN *Canyon Loop Trail (Design)Carryover - In Design 165,996$ 90,436$ 11,946$ 63,614$ FP17500 25517 CONSTRUCT **Canyon Loop Trail (Construction)Carryover 485,500$ 267,500$ 33,000$ 185,000$ FP17501 25917 CONSTRUCT *Sycamore Canyon Park Slope Erosion Repairs Carryover - Awaiting Final Pmt 131,787$ 56,875$ 40,862$ 34,050$ FP 17502 25819 ALL **Sycamore Canyon Creek Repair Carryover 80,000$ 80,000$ FP22500 N/A DESIGN DBC AC Replacement & Air Quality Upgrades (Design)New 75,000$ 75,000$ TOTAL 938,283$ 90,436$ 68,821$ 63,614$ 75,000$ 40,862$ 34,050$ 267,500$ 113,000$ 185,000$ FY 21-22 CIP Projects Grand Total 7,527,036$ *Carryover projects **Projects moved from 20-21 deferred list Funding Source Totals 100 General Fund 90,436 CIP Project Type Totals 201 Measure W 690,000 Street Improvements 3,506,394 202 RMRA (SB-1)1,576,811 Traffic Management/Safety Improvements 51,000 203 Measure M 1,237,691 Transportation Infrastructure Improvements 1,045,000 204 Measure R 900,000 Miscellaneous PW Improvements 1,986,359 205 Gas Tax 64,000 Facilites, Parks and Rec. Improvements 938,283 206 Prop A 930,000 7,527,036$ 207 Prop C 843,685 209 SB 821 Fund - Bike and Pedestrian Paths (TDA)100,787 251 AB2766 2,493 225 CDBG 176,394 252 Hauler Fees 136,000 260 Quimby Funds 68,821 261 Measure A 185,000 262 Park Development 63,614 301 MSRC Grant 3,893 504 Building & Facilities Maintenance Fund 75,000 301-42010 FEMA 40,862 301-42055 CalOES 34,050 301-45030 Foothill Transit Grant 40,000 301-43110 Habitat Conservation Grant 267,500 7,527,036$ 1 6.1.d Packet Pg. 30 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 7.1 MEETING DATE: May 25, 2021 CASE/FILE NUMBER: Development Review and Tree Permit Planning Case No. PL2020-49 PROJECT LOCATION: 2523 Blaze Trail, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 (APN 8713-028-017) GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Rural Residential (RR) ZONING DISTRICT: Rural Residential (RR) PROPERTY OWNER: Ken Truong 1712 Pass and Covina Rd West Covina, CA 91792 APPLICANT: Pete Volbeda 164 N 2nd Ave, Suite 100 Upland, CA 91786 SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting approval of a Development Review (DR) application to demolish an existing 3,680 square-foot single-family residence and construct a new single-family residence, consisting of 10,652 square feet of living space, 2,630 square feet of garage and storage areas and 2,224 square feet of patio/balcony areas on a 0.7-acre parcel. A Tree Permit (TP) is also requested to remove one protected coast live oak tree and one California sycamore tree , and replace them with six coast live oak trees on site. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the attached Resolution (Attachment A) approving Development Review and Tree Permit No. PL2020-49, based on the findings of Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Sections 22.48 and 22.38, subject to conditions. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ~ 21810 COPLEY DRIVE ~ DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 ~ TEL. (909) 839-7030 ~ FAX (909) 861-3117 7.1 Packet Pg. 31 Development Review and Tree Permit Planning Case No. PL2020-49 Page 2 of 12 Site (Plan View) Aerial BACKGROUND: The project site is located in the Diamond Bar Country Estates (The Country), on the west side of Blaze Trail, just south of Timbertop Lane. The property was developed in 1970 under Los Angeles County standards with a 3,680 square-foot, single-family residence and garage. There are two California sycamore trees, one coast live oak tree, and a California black walnut tree on the property, which are all classified as protected trees. The proposed project is currently being reviewed by the Diamond Bar Country Est ates Architectural Committee. The property is legally described as Lot 135 of Tract No. 30578, and the Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) is 8713-028-017. Site and Surrounding General Plan, Zoning and Land Uses The image below highlights the subject property: 7.1 Packet Pg. 32 Development Review and Tree Permit Planning Case No. PL2020-49 Page 3 of 12 Existing Residence Adjacent Property to the North Adjacent Property to the South 7.1 Packet Pg. 33 Development Review and Tree Permit Planning Case No. PL2020-49 Page 4 of 12 The following table summarizes the land use status of the subject property and its surroundings: General Plan Designation Zoning District Land Use Site Rural Residential RR Single-Family Residential North Rural Residential RR Single-Family Residential South Rural Residential RR Single-Family Residential East Rural Residential RR Single-Family Residential West Rural Residential RR Single-Family Residential Project Description Site Plan As stated, the property’s gross lot area is 29,070 square feet (0.7 acres), which includes a 32-foot wide private street easement along its frontage for Blaze Trail. The property is an irregularly-shaped lot with a net buildable area (i.e., minus the private street easement) of 24,390 square feet (0.6 acres). The property is a hillside property with a descending slope at 21 percent that starts from the private street easement to the rear property line. The proposed house is situated toward the front of the lot, 30 feet from the edge of the private street easement line on Blaze Trail. The front elevation faces Blaze Trail. A circular driveway is proposed at the front of the property, and another driveway which leads into the side yard to provide access to a three -car garage. A pool, spa with waterfall, and 2,224 square feet of patio/balcony areas, are also proposed in the rear yard. There is an existing accessory building used for gardening purposes in the rear yard. There are four protected trees on the property. Two are proposed for removal, as further discussed under the “Tree Permit” section below. Grading Plan The applicant is proposing to cut 1,100 cubic yards of soil and fill 1,100 cubic yards of soil throughout the property to expand the existing building pad. The soil will be balanced on site and thus does not require any truck trips to import or export soil. 7.1 Packet Pg. 34 Development Review and Tree Permit Planning Case No. PL2020-49 Page 5 of 12 The applicant is proposing one retaining wall, with a maximum height of four feet, at the rear of the property to support fills below the natural grade to expand the buil dable pad for the house. Another retaining wall, with a maximum height of four feet, is proposed on the north side yard to support a cut below the natural grade. All exposed portions of the proposed retaining walls will have a decorative finish, painted stucco to match the house. Architecture The architectural style is Italianate with eclectic details, and will include elements such as clay “S”-shaped roof tiles on a hipped roof, precast concrete stone columns and balusters, arched windows with crown molding, earth-toned smooth stucco and stone veneer. Additionally, the design includes a front porch and balcony/patio areas. Balconies with precast stone balusters are proposed throughout the three levels of the house. The proposed three-level house’s floor plan is comprised of the following components: • Basement Floor – Garage, game room, living room, guest room, two bathrooms, laundry room and storage areas. • First Floor – Common areas (foyer, family room, kitchen with wok, dining room, nook), office, play room, powder room, and two bedrooms with a bathroom and walk-in closet. • Second Floor – Master suite with a bathroom and walk-in closet, two bedrooms also with a bathroom and walk-in closet, den, and a laundry room. • A front porch, patio and balcony areas totaling 2,224 square feet are proposed throughout the three levels of the residence. The floor area distribution is summarized on the following page: Front Elevation 7.1 Packet Pg. 35 Development Review and Tree Permit Planning Case No. PL2020-49 Page 6 of 12 PROJECT SUMMARY (square footage) Living Area o Basement o First Floor o Second Floor 2,210 4,600 3,842 10,652 Non-Livable Area o Garage 780 o Storage 1,850 o Patio/Balcony 2,224 o Existing Accessory Structure 609 5,463 TOTAL FLOOR AREA 16,115 The height of the building is 35 feet, measured from the finished grade to the highest point of the roofline. The accessory building in the rear will be renovated to match the exterior building materials and colors of the proposed home. Landscape Plan The applicant is proposing a variety of trees to be planted throughout the property, including four 24-inch box arbutus marina trees, six 24-inch box coast live oak trees and two date palms, in the front and rear yards. Two existing protected tre es will remain on the property: one California sycamore and California black walnut. Four trees are proposed for removal due to their proximity to construction: one London plane, one California pepper, one protected California sycamore and one protected California black walnut. The Tree Permit section below provides further analysis on the removal of these trees and appropriate mitigation. Additionally, various 5-gallon and 1-gallon shrubs that have a variety of color, texture, and form are proposed throu ghout the front, side and rear yards. Overall, landscaping consists of drought tolerant and non -invasive species to minimize irrigation and reduce the area of turf. The project is required to comply with the City’s Water Efficient Landscaping Ordinance, and compliance will be verified during building plan check and final inspections. The subject property is located within the Los Angeles County Fire Department “High Fire Hazard Severity Zone.” Therefore, the proposed landscaping must comply with the Fire Department’s Fuel Modification Plan requirements. The landscape plans will be submitted for review and approval by the Fire Department during building plan check. 7.1 Packet Pg. 36 Development Review and Tree Permit Planning Case No. PL2020-49 Page 7 of 12 ANALYSIS: Review Authority The proposed project requires Planning Commission review and approval of two entitlement applications: Development Review (DR) and a Tree Permit (TP). The analysis that follows provides the basis for staff’s recommendation to approve the DR and TP applications. Development Review (DBMC Chapter 22.48) New construction of a single-family home requires Planning Commission approval of a Development Review application. Development Review approval is required to ensure compliance with the City’s General Plan policies, development standards, and design guidelines, and to minimize adverse effects of the proposed project upon the surrounding properties and the City in general. As stated in Section 22.48.010 of the Development Code, the Development Review process was established to ensure that new development and additions to existing development are consistent with the General Plan “through the promotion of high functional and aesthetic standards to complement and add to the economic, physical, and social character” of Diamond Bar. Development Standards: The following table compares the proposed project with the City’s development standards for residential development in the RR zone: Development Feature Residential Development Standards Proposed Meets Requirements Front Setback 30 feet 30 feet Yes Side Setbacks 15 feet on one side, 10 feet on the other 12’2” – north side 16’-4” – south side Yes Side Yard Minimum Between Adjoining Structures 25 feet 31’-6” – north side 62’-8” – south side Yes Rear Setback 25 feet 31 feet Yes Lot Coverage Maximum of 30% 21.3% Yes Max. Building Height 35 feet 35 feet Yes Parking 2-car garage 3-car garage Yes Retaining Wall Height 4-foot exposed (supporting fill) 4-foot exposed (supporting fill and cut) Yes 7.1 Packet Pg. 37 Development Review and Tree Permit Planning Case No. PL2020-49 Page 8 of 12 Tree Permit (DBMC Section 22.38.110) A Tree Permit is required when the removal or protection of a protected tree is requested. A protected tree is any of the following: • Native oak, walnut, sycamore and willow trees with a d iameter at breast height (“DBH” i.e., 4.5 feet above ground level) of eight inches or greate r, and located on parcels larger than one-half acre in area; • Trees of significant historical or value as designated by the City Council; • Any tree required to be preserved or relocated as a condition of approval for a discretionary permit; • Any tree required to be planted as a condition of approval for a discretionary permit; or • A stand of trees, the nature of which makes each tree dependent upon the others for survival. Trees that are so damaged, diseased or in danger of falling (as verified by an arboris t) that cannot be effectively preserved, or its presence is a threat to other protected trees or existing or proposed structures are exempted from being replaced at a three to one (3:1) ratio. The applicant submitted a tree report, prepared by a licensed arborist in December 2020. There are four trees on site that are considered protected, including two California sycamores with a DBH of 34 and 44 inches, one coast live oak with a DBH of 20 inches, and a multi-trunk California black walnut with a DBH of four to eight inches. Two protected trees in fair health will remain on the property: one California sycamore (Tree #1) and California black walnut (Tree #6). These trees will be retained and protected in place with protective, chain-link fencing to be installed prior to construction activities. Four trees that are in fair to poor health are proposed for removal: one London plane (Tree #2), one California pepper (Tree #5), one protected California sycamore (Tree #3) and one protected coast live oak (Tree #4). These trees are located in or near areas of construction and cannot be preserved in place. The protected trees will be replaced at a 3:1 ratio with six 24 -inch box coast live oak trees at the rear of the property, which is the required amount of mitigation trees to be planted. For work close to the protected zone, protective measures shall include, but are not limited to the following: • Tree protection fencing will be a minimum of five feet high and located five feet from the drip line of the trees. • Fencing will be of a flexible configuration or chain link, supported by vertical posts at a maximum of ten-foot intervals to keep the fencing upright and in place. 7.1 Packet Pg. 38 Development Review and Tree Permit Planning Case No. PL2020-49 Page 9 of 12 • A sign posted on the fencing which states “Warning: Tree Protection Zone” and stating the requirements of all workers in the protection zone. • Throughout the course of construction, the tree protection fencing shall be maintained and the site shall be maintained and cleaned at all times. No construction staging or disposal of construction materia ls or byproducts, including but not limited to paint, plaster, or chemical solutions is allowed in the tree protection zone. These protective measures are included as conditions in the attached resolution. Compliance with Hillside Management Ordinance (DBMC Section 22.22) The proposed project was reviewed for compliance with the City’s Hillside Management Design Guidelines and regulations. The project complies with all of the regulations and guidelines to ensure that development will complemen t the character and topography of hillside areas set forth in the Development Code, and incorporates the following features: Location of Trees 7.1 Packet Pg. 39 Development Review and Tree Permit Planning Case No. PL2020-49 Page 10 of 12 • The maximum building height is 35 feet, which is the maximum allowed; • The home is constructed into the hillside with a basement, which gives the appearance of a two-story structure; • Architectural treatment is provided on all sides of the building with varying setbacks; • All proposed retaining walls associated with the building pads are at a maximum exposed height of four feet; and • Earth tone building materials and color schemes are used that blend in with the natural landscape. The project complies with all of the regulations and guidelines to ensure that development will complement the character and topography of hillside areas set forth in the Development Code. Compatibility with Neighborhood The proposed house will be located on an existing leveled pad but will be extended for a larger building footprint and rear yard improvements. The new house will not be intrusive to neighboring homes since the proposed house will not block existing views from adjacent properties. The property to the north is at a slightly higher grade and will continue to have views from the rear yard. The property to the south is at a lower grade and will have views to the west. N 7.1 Packet Pg. 40 Development Review and Tree Permit Planning Case No. PL2020-49 Page 11 of 12 The proposed house is comparable in mass and scale to existing homes on similar lots in The Country. The architecture in The Country is eclectic, and includes a variety of architectural designs. The scale and proportions of the proposed home are well balanced and appropriate for the site. In sum, the proposed project fits the character of the neighborhood on which it is proposed. The project incorporates the principles of the City’s Residential Design Guidelines as follows: • The new single-family residence will conform to all development standards, including building height, lot coverage and setbacks, which is consistent with other homes in The Country; • A gradual transition between the project and adjacent uses is achieved t hrough appropriate setbacks, building height, landscaping, and window and door placement; • The proposed new single-family residence is appropriate in mass and scale to the site; • Elevations are treated with detailed architectural elements; • The exterior finish materials and colors blend with the natural environment; and • Effective landscape design should serve the dual purpose of intrinsically enhancing a project setting, as well as integrating the landscaping into the overall architectural design. Staff finds the proposed plant palette to be diverse, and the plant selections are compatible with Southern California native landscapes. Additional Review The Public Works Department and Building and Safety Division reviewed this project, and their comments are included in the attached resolution as conditions of approval. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: On May 14, 2021, public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 1,000-foot radius of the project site. On May 14, 2021, the notice was published in t he San Gabriel Valley Tribune newspaper. A notice display board was posted at the site, and a copy of the notice was posted at the City's four designated community posting sites. Public Comments Received No comments have been received as of the publication date of this report. 7.1 Packet Pg. 41 Development Review and Tree Permit Planning Case No. PL2020-49 Page 12 of 12 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: This project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on that assessment, the City has determined the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to the provisions of Article 19 Section 15303(a) (construction of a new single-family residence) of the CEQA Guidelines. No further environmental review is required. PREPARED BY: REVIEWED BY: Attachments: A. Draft Resolution No. 2021-XX, Standard Conditions of Approval B. Site Plan, Floor Plan, Elevation, Roof Plan, Conceptual Landscape Plan, Grading Plan C. Tree Report Dated December 22, 2020 D. Color and Material Board 7.1 Packet Pg. 42 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. PL2020-49 TO DEMOLISH AN EXISTING 3,680 SQUARE-FOOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE TO CONSTRUCT A NEW 10,652 SQUARE-FOOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH 2,630 SQUARE FEET OF GARAGE AND STORAGE AREAS, 2,224 SQUARE FEET OF PATIO/BALCONY AREAS, AND A CONCURRENT TREE PERMIT TO REMOVE AND REPLACE, AT A 3:1 RATIO, ONE COAST LIVE OAK AND ONE CALIFORNIA SYCAMORE TREES, ON A 0.7 GROSS ACRE (29,070 GROSS SQUARE-FOOT) LOT LOCATED AT 2523 BLAZE TRAIL, DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 (APN 8713-028-017). A. RECITALS 1. The property owner, Ken Truong and applicant, Pete Volbeda, have filed an application for Development Review and Tree Permit No. PL2020-49 to demolish an existing 3,680 square-foot single-family residence to construct a new 10,652 square-foot single-family residence, 2,630 square feet of garage and storage areas and 2,224 square feet of patio/balcony areas located at 2523 Blaze Trail, Diamond Bar, County of Los Angeles, California. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review and Tree Permit shall be referred to as the "Proposed Project." 2. The following approvals are requested from the Planning Commission: (a) Development Review to demolish an existing 3,680 square-foot single- family residence to construct a new 10,652 square-foot single-family residence, 2,630 square feet of garage and storage areas and 2,224 square feet of patio/balcony areas; and (b) Tree Permit to remove one coast live oak tree and one California sycamore tree. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review and Tree Permit shall be referred to as the "Proposed Project." 3. The subject property is made up of one parcel totaling 29,070 gross square feet (0.7 gross acres). It is located in the Rural Residential (RR) zone with an underlying General Plan land use designation of Rural Residential. 4. The legal description of the subject property is Lot 135 of Tract No. 30578. The Assessor’s Parcel Number is 8713-028-017. 5. On May 14, 2021, public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 1,000-foot radius of the Project site. Also, public notices were posted at the project site and the City’s four designated community posting sites. On May 14, 7.1.a Packet Pg. 43 2 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX 2021, notification of the public hearing for this project was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune newspaper. 6. On May 25, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing, solicited testimony from all interested individuals, and concluded said hearing on that date. B. RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: 1. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct; and 2. The Planning Commission hereby determines the Project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to the provisions of Article 19, Section 15303(a) (construction of a new single-family residence) of the CEQA Guidelines. Therefore, no further environmental review is required. C. FINDINGS OF FACT Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein and as prescribed under Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Sections 22.48 and 22.38, this Planning Commission hereby finds as follows: Development Review Findings (DBMC Section 22.48.040) 1. The design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with the applicable elements of the City's General Plan, City Design Guidelines, and development standards of the applicable district, design guidelines, and architectural criteria for special areas (e.g., theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards or planned developments): The design of the Project is consistent with the applicable elements of the City’s General Plan, City Design Guidelines and development standards. The City’s General Plan Policy LU-P-56 requires that development on privately-owned, residentially designated land in hillside areas shall be compatible with the surrounding natural areas promoting design principles such as minimizing grading, preserving existing vistas, incorporate site and architectural design that is sensitive to the hillsides, and require fuel modification. An Italianate architectural design is being proposed with earth tone shades for the exterior finish as not to detract from the hillsides. From the street view, the building has the appearance of a two-story structure, while the rear of the building steps down to three levels. The Project will also be required to implement fuel modification. A gradual transition between the project and adjacent uses is achieved through appropriate setbacks, building height, window and door placement, and the 7.1.a Packet Pg. 44 3 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX proposed exterior finishes of the single-family residence incorporates various details and architectural elements such as low-pitched hipped s-tile roof, precast concrete stone columns and balusters, arched windows with crown molding, earth-toned smooth stucco and stone veneer. All elevations are architecturally treated and strongly articulated along the visible façade [City’s Design Guidelines B. Architecture (3)]. The Project complies with all development standards of the Rural Residential zoning district by complying with all development standards such as required setbacks, building height, and lot coverage. The project site is not part of any theme area, specific plan, community plan, boulevard or planned development. 2. The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future development s, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards; The proposed single-family house will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments because the use of the project site is designed for a single-family home and the surrounding uses are also single - family homes. The proposed single-family house will not interfere with vehicular or pedestrian movements, such as access or other functional requirements of a single-family home because it complies with the requirements for driveway widths and exceeds the minimum number of required off-street parking spaces. 3. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain and enhance the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22.48: Development Review Standards, the City’s Design Guidelines, the City's General Plan, or any applicable specific plan; The City’s General Plan Policy LU-P-56 requires that residential development be compatible with the prevailing character of the surrounding neighborhood in terms of building scale, density, massing, and design. The City’s General Plan Goal CC-G-4 also requires the preservation of the scale and character of existing residential neighborhoods and ensure sensitive transitions between densities and uses. The City’s Design Guidelines Architecture (1) requires compatibility with the surrounding character including harmonious building style, form, size, color, material and roofline. The scale and proportions of the proposed home are well balanced and appropriate for the 0.7 gross-acre site. The Italianate architectural style with earth tone shades for the exterior finish is compatible with other homes in the neighborhood since the architecture in The Country is eclectic, and includes a variety of architectural designs. The Project minimizes negative impact s on surrounding uses since the house will not block existing views from adjacent properties. In sum, the Project fits the character of the neighborhood on which it is proposed. 7.1.a Packet Pg. 45 4 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX 4. The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, color, and will remain aesthetically appealing; The design of the proposed home is Italianate with architectural elements such as low-pitched hipped s-tile roof, precast concrete stone columns and balusters, arched windows with crown molding, earth-toned smooth stucco and stone veneer. The new home will not be intrusive to neighboring homes. Earth-tone shades for the exterior finish are used to soften the building’s visual impact and assist in preserving the hillside’s aesthetic value. Also, landscaping is integrated into the site to complement the massing of the house and blend in with neighboring homes and the natural environment of the site in order to maintain a desirable environment. The scale and proportions of the proposed home are well balanced and appropriate for the site. 5. The proposed development will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious (e.g., negative effect on property values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity; and Before the issuance of any City permits, the proposed project is required to comply with all conditions within the approved resolution, and the Building and Safety Division and Public Works Departments requirements. Through the permit and inspection process, the referenced agencies will ensure that the proposed project is not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. 6. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as set forth under Article 19 Section 15303(a) (construction of a new single-family residence) of the CEQA Guidelines. Tree Permit Finding (DBMC Section 22.38.110) 1. The tree is a public nuisance by causing damage to improvements (e.g., building foundations, retaining walls, roadways/driveways, patios, and decks) and appropriate mitigation measures will be implemented in compliance with DBMC Section 22.38.140 (Tree protection requirements) below. The applicant submitted a tree report, prepared by a licensed arborist in December 2020. There are four trees on site that are considered protected, including two California sycamores with a DBH of 34 and 44 inches, one coast live oak with a DBH of 20 inches, and a multi-trunk California black walnut with a DBH of four to eight inches. Two protected trees in fair health will remain on the property: one California sycamore (Tree #1) and California bla ck walnut (Tree #6). These trees will be retained and protected in place with protective, 7.1.a Packet Pg. 46 5 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX chain-link fencing to be installed prior to construction activities. Four trees that are in fair to poor health are proposed for removal: one London plane (Tree #2), one California pepper (Tree #5), one protected California sycamore (Tree #3) and one protected coast live oak (Tree #4). These trees are located in or near areas of construction and cannot be preserved. The protected trees will be replaced at a 3:1 ratio with six 24-inch box coast live oak trees at the rear of the property, which is the required amount of mitigation trees to be planted. The planting of six new protected species will provide sufficient replacement of the natural landscape. Based upon the findings and conclusion set forth above, the Planning Commission hereby approves this Application, subject to the following conditions: 1. Development shall substantially comply with the plans and documents presented to the Planning Commission at the public hearing. 2. Prior to building permit issuance, the required landscape plan shall be designed to meet the requirements of the Los Angeles County Fire Department’s Fuel Modification Plan Guidelines in terms of plant selection, placement and maintenance. The final landscape and fuel modification plans shall be submitted to the Los Angeles Fire Department for review and approval. 3. Prior to building permit issuance, a Certification of Design, together with landscape and irrigation plans prepared by a licensed lan dscape architect, shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval by the City’s Consulting Landscape Architect. Landscape and irrigation plans shall comply with the updated Water Efficient Landscaping Ordinance. 4. Prior to the issuance of a demolition, grading or building permit, the protected trees shall be barricaded by chain link fencing with a minimum height of five feet, or by another protective barrier approved by the Community Development Director or designee. Chain link fencing shall be supported by vertical posts at a maximum of ten-foot intervals to keep the fencing upright and in place. Barriers shall be placed at least five (5) feet from the drip line of the trees. A sign posted on the fencing which states “Warning: Tree Protection Zone” and stating the requirements of all workers in the protection zone. Throughout the course of construction, the tree protection fencing shall be maintained and the site shall be maintained and cleaned at all times. No construction staging o r disposal of construction materials or byproducts, including but not limited to paint, plaster, or chemical solutions is allowed in the tree protection zone. The fencing plan shall be shown on the grading plan and other applicable construction documents and the Applicant, Owner or construction manager shall contact the Planning Division to conduct a site visit prior to commencement of any work to ensure this condition is met. 7.1.a Packet Pg. 47 6 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX 5. All work conducted close to the protected zone of the protected oak and black walnut trees shall be performed within the presence of a qualified arborist. A 48-hour notice shall be provided to the arborist and the Planning Division prior to the planned start of work. 6. If protective measures fail to ensure the survival of any protected tree during construction activity or within three years after approval of final inspection, a minimum of three 24-inch box protected species shall be planted on the property for each protected tree that dies. 7. Standard Conditions. The applicant shall comply with the standard development conditions attached hereto. The Planning Commission shall: a. Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and b. Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail to the property owner, Ken Truong, 1712 Pass and Covina Rd, West Covina, CA 91792, and applicant, Pete Volbeda 164 N 2nd Ave, Suite 100, Upland, CA 91786. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MAY 2021, BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. By: ______________________________________ William Rawlings, Chairperson I, Greg Gubman, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of May 2021, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: ABSTAIN: Commissioners: ATTEST: ______________________________________ Greg Gubman, Secretary 7.1.a Packet Pg. 48 7 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS USE PERMITS, COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL NEW AND REMODELED STRUCTURES PROJECT #: Development Review and Tree Permit No. PL 2020-49 SUBJECT: To demolish an existing 3,680 square-foot single-family residence to construct a new 10,652 square-foot single-family residence, 2,630 square feet of garage and storage areas and 2,224 square feet of patio/balcony areas. A Tree Permit (TP) is also requested to remove one protected coast live oak tree and one California sycamore tree and replace with six coast live oak trees on site. PROPERTY OWNER: Ken Truong 1712 Pass and Covina Rd West Covina, CA 91792 APPLICANT: Pete Volbeda 164 N 2nd Ave, Suite 100 Upland, CA 91786 LOCATION: 2523 Blaze Trail, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. I. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION AT (909) 839-7030, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, and its officers, agents and employees, from any claim, action, or proceeding to attack, set-aside, void or annul, the approval of Development Review and Tree Permit No. PL2020-49 brought within the time period provided by Government Code Section 66499.37. In the event the city and/or its officers, agents and employees are made a party of any such action: 7.1.a Packet Pg. 49 8 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX (a) Applicant shall provide a defense to the City defendants or at the City's option reimburse the City its costs of defense, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, incurred in defense of such claims. (b) Applicant shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against the City defendants. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action of proceeding, and shall cooperate fully in the defense thereof. 2. This approval shall not be effective for any purpose until the applicant and owner of the property involved have filed, within twenty-one (21) days of approval of this Development Review and Tree Permit No. PL2020-49, at the City of Diamond Bar Community Development Department, their affidavit stating that they are aware of and agree to accept all th e conditions of this approval. Further, this approval shall not be effective until the applicants pay remaining City processing fees, school fees and fees for the review of submitted reports. 3. All designers, architects, engineers, and contractors associated with this project shall obtain a Diamond Bar Business License; and a zoning approval for those businesses located in Diamond Bar. 4. Signed copies of Planning Commission Resolution No. 2021-XX, Standard Conditions, and all conditions of approval shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 5. Prior to the plan check, revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval. 6. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval shall be completed. 7. The project site shall be maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of approval and all laws, or other applicable regulations. 8. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and any applicable Specific Plan in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 9. All site, grading, landscape/irrigation, and roof plans, and elevation plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of City permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.,) or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 7.1.a Packet Pg. 50 9 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX 10. The hours during which construction activities causing the operation of any tools or equipment used in construction, drilling, repair, alteration, or demolition work are limited to Monday through Saturday, between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., and are not allowed at any time on Saturdays, Sundays or holidays. 11. The property owner/applicant shall remove the public hearing notice board within three days of this project's approval. 12. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of City Planning, Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works Department, and the Fire Department. 13. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall record, and provide the City with a conformed recorded copy of, a Covenant and Agreement or similar document in a form approved by the City Attorney, which restricts the rental of rooms or other portions of the property under two or more separate agreements and prohibits use of the property as a boarding or rooming house, except to the extent otherwise permitted by the Diamond Bar Municipal Code or applicable state or federal law. B. FEES/DEPOSITS 1. Applicant shall pay development fees (including but not limited to Planning, Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works Department and Mitigation Monitoring) at the established rates, prior to issuance of building or grading permit (whichever comes first), as required by the City. School fees as required shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permit. In addition, the applicant shall pay all remaining prorated City project review and processing fees prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever comes first. 2. Prior to any plan check, all deposit accounts for the processing of this project shall have no deficits. C. TIME LIMITS 1. The approval of Development Review and Tree Permit No. PL2020-49 expires within two years from the date of approval if the use has not been exercised as defined per Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Section 22.66.050 (b)(1). In accordance with DBMC Section 22.60.050(c), the applicant may request, in writing, a one -year time extension for Planning Commission consideration. Such a request must be submitted to the Planning Division prior to the expiration date and be accompanied by the review fee in accordance with the fee schedule in effect at the time of submittal. 7.1.a Packet Pg. 51 10 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX D. SITE DEVELOPMENT 1. This approval is to demolish an existing 3,680 square-foot single-family residence to construct a new 10,652 square-foot single-family residence, 2,630 square feet of garage and storage areas and 2,224 square feet of patio/balcony areas at 2523 Blaze Trail, as described in the staff report and depicted on the approved plans on file with the Planning Division, subject to the conditions listed below. 2. The construction documents submitted for plan check shall be in substantial compliance with the architectural plans approved by the Planning Commission, as modified pursuant to the conditions below. If the plan check submittal is not in substantial compliance with the approved Development Review submittal, the plans may require further staff review and re-notification of the surrounding property owners, which may delay the project and entail additional fees. 3. To ensure compliance with the provisions of the Planning Commission approval, a final inspection is required from the Planning Division when work for any phase of the project has been completed. The applicant shall inform the Planning Division and schedule an appointment for such an inspection. 4. The above conditions shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all future owners, operators, or successors thereto of the property. Non - compliance with any condition of approval or mitigation measure imposed as a condition of the approval shall constitute a violation of the City’s Development Code. Violations may be enforced in accordance with the provisions of the Development Code. 5. Failure to comply with any of the conditions set forth above or as subsequently amended in writing by the City, may result in failure to obtain a building final and/or a certificate of occupancy until full compliance is reached. The City’s requirement for full compliance may require minor corrections and/or complete demolition of a non-compliant improvement, regardless of costs incurred where the project does not comply with design requirements and approvals that the applicant agreed to when permits were pulled to construct the project. 6. The project site shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the approved plans submitted to, approved, and amended herein by the Planning Commission, on file with the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 7. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, air conditioning condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and 7.1.a Packet Pg. 52 11 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berms, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Division. 8. All roof-mounted equipment shall be screened from public view. 9. All structures, including walls, trash enclosures, canopies, etc., shall be maintained in a structurally sound, safe manner with a clean, orderly appearance. All graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours by the property owners/occupant. 10. All landscaping, structures, architectural features and public improvements damaged during construction shall be repaired or replaced upon project completion. E. SOLID WASTE 1. The site shall be maintained in a condition, which is free of debris both during and after the construction, addition, or implementation of the entitlement approved herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether during or subsequent to construction shall be done only by the property owner, applicant or by a duly permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste from residential, commercial, construction, and industrial areas within the City. It shall be the applicant's obligation to ensure that the waste contractor used has obtained permits from the City of Diamond Bar to provide such services. 2. Mandatory solid waste disposal services shall be provided by the City franchised waste hauler to all parcels/lots or uses affected by approval of this project. F. FIRE PROTECTION STANDARDS 1. Development shall be constructed to reduce the potential for spread of brushfire. (i) In the case of a conflict, where more restrictive provisions are contained in the current State and Local Building Code or in the Fire Code, the more restrictive provisions shall prevail. (ii) Roofs shall be covered with noncombustible materials as defined in the building code. Open eave ends shall be stopped in order to prevent bird nests or other combustible material lodging within the roof and to preclude entry of flames. (iii) Exterior walls shall be surfaced with noncombustible or fire -resistant materials. 7.1.a Packet Pg. 53 12 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX (iv) Balconies, patio roofs, eaves and other similar overhangs shall be of noncombustible construction or shall be protected by fire -resistant material in compliance with the building code. 2. All development shall be constructed with adequate water supply and pressure for all proposed development in compliance with standards established by the fire marshal. 3. A permanent fuel modification area shall be required around development projects or portions thereof that are adjacent or exposed to hazardous fire areas for the purpose of fire protection. The required width of the fuel modification area shall be based on applicable building and fire codes and a fire hazard analysis study developed by the fire marshal. II. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, (909) 839-7040, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. GENERAL 1. There is not a valid address assigned to this parcel. The applicant shall submit an Application for Address Change form to the Public Works Department for processing. 2. An Erosion Control Plan shall be submitted concurrently with the grading plan clearly detailing erosion control measures. These measures shall be implemented during construction. The erosion control plan shall conform to national Pollutant Discharge Elim ination System (NPDES) standards and incorporate the appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP’s) as specified in the Storm Water BMP Certification. For construction activity which disturbs one acre or greater soil a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be needed. 3. Per NPDES Permit (CAS004001) for MS4 Discharges within the Coastal Watershed of Los Angeles County (Order No. R4-2012-0175), a new single-family hillside home development project shall include mitigation measures to: (i) Conserve natural areas; (ii) Protect slopes and channels; (iii) Provide storm drain system stenciling and signage; (iv) Divert roof runoff to vegetated areas before discharge unless the diversion would result in slope instability; and (iv) Direct surface flow to vegetated areas before discharge, unless the diversion would result in slope instability. These mitigation measures shall be included with the submitted grading plans and implemented during construction. 7.1.a Packet Pg. 54 13 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX 4. Grading and construction activities and the transportation of equipment and materials and operation of heavy grading equipment shall be limited to between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. Dust generated by grading and construction activities shall be reduced by watering the soil prior to and during the activities and in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 402 and Rule 403. Reclaimed water shall be used whenever possible. Additionally, all construction equipment shall be properly muffled to reduce noise levels. B. SOILS REPORT/GRADING/RETAINING WALLS 1. Prior to grading plan submittal, a geotechnical report prepared by a Geotechnical Engineer, licensed by the State of California, shall be submitted by the applicant for approval by the City. 2. Upon approval of the geotechnical report, the applicant shall submit drainage and grading plans prepared by a Civil Engineer, licensed by the State of California, prepared in accordance with the City’s requirements for the City’s review and approval. A list of requirements for grading plan check is available from the Public Works Department. All grading (cut and fill) calculations shall be submitted to the City concurrently with the grading plan. 3. Finished slopes shall conform to City Code Section 22.22.080-Grading. 4. All easements and flood hazard areas shall be clearly identified on the grading plan. 5. The grading plan shall show the location of any retaining walls and the elevations of the top of wall/footing/retaining and the finished grade on both sides of the retaining wall. Construction details for retaining walls shall be shown on the grading plan. Calculations and details of retaining walls shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for review and approval. 6. All equipment staging areas shall be located on the project site. Staging area, including material stockpile and equipment storage area, shall be enclosed within a 6 foot-high chain link fence. All access points in the defense shall be locked whenever the construction site is not supervised. 7. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the California Building Code, City Grading Ordinance, Hillside Management Ordinance and acceptable grading practices. 7.1.a Packet Pg. 55 14 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX 8. The maximum grade of driveways serving building pad areas shall be 15 percent. Driveways with a slope of 15 percent shall incorporate grooves for traction into the construction as required by the City Engineer. 9. All slopes shall be seeded per landscape plan and/or fuel modification plan with native grasses or planted with ground cover, shrubs, and trees for erosion control upon completion of grading or some other alternative method of erosion control shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and a permanent irrigation system shall be installed. 10. Submit a stockpile plan showing the proposed location for stockpile for grading export materials, and the route of transport. 11. A pre-construction meeting shall be held at the project site with the grading contractor, applicant, and city grading inspector at least 48 hours prior to commencing grading operations. 12. Rough grade certifications by project soils and civil engineers and the as- graded geotechnical report shall be submitted for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits for the foundation of the residential structure. Retaining wall permits may be issued without a rough grade certificate. 13. Final grade certifications by project soils and civil engineers shall be submitted to the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of any project final inspections/certificate of occupancy respectively. C. DRAINAGE 1. Detailed drainage system information of the lot with careful attention to any flood hazard area shall be submitted. All drainage/runoff from the development shall be conveyed from the site to the natural drainage course. No on-site drainage shall be conveyed to adjacent parcels, unless that is the natural drainage course. D. UTILITIES 1. Easements, satisfactory to the City Engineer and the utility companies, for public utility and public services purpose shall be offered and shown on the detailed site plan for dedication to the City or affected utility company. 2. Will Serve Letters shall be submitted stating that adequate facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the City from all utilities such as, but not limited to, phone, gas, water, electric, and cable. 7.1.a Packet Pg. 56 15 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX 3. Applicant shall relocate and underground any existing on-site utilities to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the respective utility owner. 4. Underground utilities shall not be constructed within the drip line of any mature tree except as approved by a registered arborist. E. SEWERS 1. Applicant shall obtain connection permit(s) from the City and County Sanitation District prior to issuance of building permits. 2. Any homeowner that installs a new septic tank system, repairs and existing septic tank or adds any plumbing fixture units or bedroom equivalents to the facility served by an existing septic system will need to submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to the Regional Water Quality Control Board for Waste Discharge Requirements and submit a copy of the se nt NOI and check to the City. Please refer to City handouts. 3. Applicant, at applicant’s sole cost and expense, shall construct the sewer system in accordance with the City, Los Angeles County Public Works Division. Sewer plans shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for review and approval by the City. III. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 839-7020, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Conditions: 1. At the time of plan check submittal, plans and construction shall conform to current State and Local Building Code (i.e. 2019 California Building Code series will apply) requirements and all other applicable construction codes, ordinances and regulations in effect. 2. Provisions for CAL Green shall be implemented onto plans and certification shall be provided by a third party as required by the Building Division. Specific water, waste, low VOC, and related conservation measures shall be shown on plans. Construction shall conform to the current CAL Green Code. 3. Only one single family dwelling is allowed on this property unless specifically approved otherwise per CBC 202. B. Plan Check – Items to be addressed prior to plan approval: 4. The minimum design load for wind in this area is 110 M .P.H. exposures “C” and the site is within seismic zone D or E. The applicant shall submit drawings and calculations prepared by a California State licensed Architect/Engineer with wet stamp and signature. 7.1.a Packet Pg. 57 16 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX 5. This project shall comply with the energy conservation requirements of the State of California Energy Commission. All lighting shall be high efficacy or equivalent per the current California Energy Code 119 and 150(k). 6. Indoor air quality shall be provided consistent with ASHRAE 62.2 as required per California Energy Code 150(o). 7. Public Works/Engineering Department is required to review and approve grading plans that clearly show all finish elevations, drainage, and retaining wall(s) locations. These plans shall be consistent with the site plan submitted to the Building & Safety Division. 8. “Separate permits are required for pool, spa, waterfall, crib walls, demolition of existing pool and house structure, retaining walls, fences over 6’ in height, and tennis court” and shall be noted on plans. 9. There shall be design for future electrical vehicle charging including circuitry in the electrical panel and future conduit. 10. All balconies shall be designed for 1.5 times the live load for the area served per CBC Table 1607.1 and provide ventilation in the joist space per CBC 2304.12.2.6. 11. All easements shall be shown on the site plan. 12. Fire Department approval shall be required. Contact the Fire Department to check the fire zone for the location of your property. If this project is located in High Hazard Fire Zone, it shall meet requirements of the fire zone per CBC Chapter 7A. a. All unenclosed under-floor areas shall be constructed as exterior wall. b. All openings into the attic, floor and/or other enclosed areas shall be covered with corrosion-resistant wire mesh not less than 1/4 inch or more than 1/2 inch in any dimension except where such openings are equipped with sash or door. c. Eaves shall be protected. d. Exterior construction shall be one-hour or non-combustible. e. Fuel modification plans shall be approved through LA County Fire Fuel Modification Unit. f. LA County Fire shall approve plans for fire flow availability due to home being over 3600 sf as required per CFC Appendix B105.1. 13. All retaining walls shall be separately submitted to the Building & Safety and Public Works/Engineering Departments for review and approval. 7.1.a Packet Pg. 58 17 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX 14. A soils report is required per CBC 1803 and all recommendations of the soils report shall be adhered to. 15. Slope setbacks shall be consistent with California Building Code Figure 1805.3.1 and California Residential Code R403.1.7. Foundations shall provide a minimum distance to daylight. 16. Light and ventilation shall comply with CBC 1203 and 1205. This would include storage areas to be converted into habitable space in the basement. 17. Design for future electric vehicle charging shall be provided consistent with C AL Green 4.106.4. 18. New single-family dwellings shall have solar panels installed in conformance with CA Energy Code 150.1(c)14. 19. An occupancy separation shall be provided between the garage and habitable uses. 20. Vents shall be at least 4’ to property line including for pool equipment. 21. The room next to the garage shall be defined and be accessory to the garage. C. Permit – Items required prior to building permit issuance: 22. Solid waste management of construction material shall incorporate recycling material collection per Diamond Bar Municipal Code 8.16 of Title 8. The contractor shall complete all required forms and pay applicable deposits prior to permit. 23. Prior to building permit issuance, all school district fees shall be paid. Please obtain a form from the Building and Safety Division to take directly to the school district. 24. Submit grading plans clearly showing all finish elevations, drainage, and retaining wall locations. No building permits shall be issued prior to submitting a pad certification. 25. Sewer connections require sewer connection fees and approval from the LA County Sanitation District. 26. AQMD notification is required at least 10 days prior to any demo lition. Proof of notification is required at permit issuance. 27. All workers on the job shall be covered by workman’s compensation insurance under a licensed general contractor. Any changes to the contractor shall be updated on the building permit. 7.1.a Packet Pg. 59 18 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX 28. The basement retaining wall must be separated from the house plans and separately permitted in order to certify the building pad before permit issuance of the house structure. D. Construction – Conditions required during construction: 29. Fire sprinklers are required for new single-family dwellings (CRC R313.2). Sprinklers shall be approved by LA County Fire Department prior to installation and shall be inspected at framing stage and finalization of construction. 30. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been met. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 31. Every permit issued by the building official under the provisions of this Code shall expire and become null and void unless the work authorized by such permit is commenced within one year after permit issuance, and if a successful inspection has not been obtained from the building official within one-hundred-eighty (180) days from the date of permit issuance or the last successful inspection. A successful inspection shall mean a documented passed inspection by the city building inspector as outlined in Section 110.6. 32. All structures and property shall be maintained in a safe and clean manner during construction. The property shall be free of debris, trash, and weeds. 33. All equipment staging areas shall be maintained in an orderly manner and screened behind a minimum 6’ high fence. 34. A height and setback survey may be required at completion of framing and foundations construction phases respectively. 35. The project shall be protected by a construction fence to the satisfaction of the Building Official, and shall comply with the NPDES & BMP requirements (sand bags, etc.). All fencing shall be view obstructing with opaque surfaces. 36. The applicant shall contact Dig Alert and have underground utility locations marked by the utility companies prior to any excavation. Contact Dig Alert by dialing 811 or their website at www.digalert.org. 37. The applicant shall first request and secure approval from the City for any changes or deviations from approved plans prior to proceeding with any work in accordance with such changes or deviations. 38. All glazing in hazardous locations shall be labeled as safety glass. The labeling shall be visible for inspection. 39. Pursuant to California Residential Code (CRC) Section R315, carbon monoxide detectors are required in halls leading to sleeping rooms. 7.1.a Packet Pg. 60 19 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX 40. Drainage patterns shall match the approve d grading/drainage plan from the Public Works/Engineering Department. Surface water shall drain away from the building at a 2% minimum slope. The final as-built conditions shall match the grading/drainage plan or otherwise approved as-built grading/drainage plan. 41. Decks, roofs, and other flat surfaces shall slope at least 1/4”/ft with approved and listed water proofing material. Guardrails shall be provided for these surfaces at least 42” minimum in height, 4” maximum spacing between rails, and capable o f resisting at least 20 pounds per lineal foot of lateral load. 42. Bodies of water that are greater than 18” in depth shall have the required barriers to prevent unintentional access per CBC 3904.4. 43. Special inspections and structural observation will be req uired in conformance with CBC 1704 to 1709. END 7.1.a Packet Pg. 61 7.1.bPacket Pg. 62 7.1.bPacket Pg. 63 7.1.bPacket Pg. 64 7.1.bPacket Pg. 65 7.1.bPacket Pg. 66 7.1.bPacket Pg. 67 7.1.bPacket Pg. 68 7.1.bPacket Pg. 69 7.1.bPacket Pg. 70 7.1.bPacket Pg. 71 7.1.bPacket Pg. 72 7.1.bPacket Pg. 73 2OFSHEETSSCALESHEETJOB NO.1/10"=1'-0"20005DRAWNDATE01-22-20CHECKEDR.S.P.M.Phone: 909 373 19591937 West 9th StreetUpland, CA 91786pmay@philmaydesign.comwww.philmaydesign.comREVISIONSBYL-1TREE INVENTORY PLAN2523 BLAZE TRAIL TRUONG RESIDENCE DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 Fax: 909 373 1958Np LR iST E R il Eh DGE P I TDATE05-31-21RENEWAL DATE13EPCDNSa.SMAyASIGNATURE0AHCIRCE4T10'0'25'20'30'02-22-202109-14-20207.1.bPacket Pg. 74 CL-2SECTION N.T.S.42" PEDESTAL & W.I. RAILINGC2OFSHEETSSCALESHEETJOB NO.1/10"=1'-0"20005DRAWNDATE01-22-20CHECKEDR.S.P.M.Phone: 909 373 19591937 West 9th StreetUpland, CA 91786pmay@philmaydesign.comwww.philmaydesign.comREVISIONSBYL-2PLANTING PLAN2523 BLAZE TRAIL TRUONG RESIDENCE DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 Fax: 909 373 1958Np LR iST E R il Eh DGE P I TDATE05-31-21RENEWAL DATE13EPCDNSa.SMAyASIGNATURE0AHCIRCE4T10'0'25'20'30'Maximum Applied Water Allowance (MAWA)Total MAWA = (ETo x 0.55 x LA x 0.62) = Gallons per year for LAwhere:MAWA = Maximum Applied Water Allowance (gallons per year)ETo = Reference Evapotranspiration Appendix C (inches per year)0.55 = Evapotranspiration Adjustment Factor (ETAF) residential0.45 = Evapotranspiration Adjustment Factor (ETAF) non-residential1.0 = ETAF for Special Landscaped AreaLA = Landscaped Area (square feet)0.62 = Conversion factor (to gallons per square foot)SLA = Special Landscaped Area (square feet)MAWA for LA=Total MAWA =ETo ETAF LA or SLA (ft2) Conversion MAWA (Gallons Per Year)xxx=51.30.626,004105,030.00105,030.00 Gal./ Year6,004=0.55MAWA Calculation:Estimated Applied Water UseEAWU = ETo x KL [/$[·,( *DOORQVSHU\HDUwhere:EAWU = Estimated Applied Water Use (gallons per year)ETo = Reference Evapotranspiration (inches per year)KL = Landscape CoefficientLA = Landscaped Area (square feet)0.62 = Conversion factor (to gallons per square foot)IE = Irrigation EfficiencETo KL LA Conversion IE EAWU (Gallons per year)=1,024EAWU Calculation(Bubbler) Low Water Trees=xx0.62126x·0.8177,175.00 Gal./ Year6,004Total EAWU ==76,151(Drip) Low Water Using Shrubxx0.624,684x·0.8153.153.10.20.4=0Synthetic Turf (non-irrigated)xx0.621,194x·053.1002-22-2021NOTE: ͞dŚĞůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞƉůĂŶƐƐŚĂůůĐŽŵƉůǇǁŝƚŚƚŚĞǁĂƚĞƌefficient landscaping requirements per DBMC Chapter 8.14"______________________________________________Phil May, Landscape Architect Date02-22-202109-14-2020NOTE: Proposed synthetic turf will consistof lifelike blades of grass that emulate realgrass in look and color with a minimum pileheight of 134 inch.EAWUMAWA12-22-202002-22-202105-06-20217.1.bPacket Pg. 75 1 TREE REPORT FOR Ken Truong 2523 Blaze Trail Diamond Bar, CA SITE ADDRESS 2523 Blaze Trail Diamond Bar, CA REPORT DONE BY: PHIL MAY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 1937 W 9TH STREET UPLAND, CA 91786 (909) 373-1959 & MIKE PARKER CERTIFIED ARBORIST WE3414A California Arbor Care Inc P.O. Box 746 Chino, CA 91708 909-590-4100 Fax 909-590-4165 December 22, 2020 7.1.c Packet Pg. 76 2 I. INTRODUCTION This arborist report of surveyed existing established trees for the residential development, of single family dwelling at 2523 Blaze Trail, Diamond Bar, CA 9176. Prepared an inventory and map of trees to be potentially impacted by the project  Recommendations for tree protection and mitigation II. INVENTORY METHODS The inventory and report was prepared in accordance with the City of Diamond Bar Tree Preservation guidelines. The inventory was conducted using survey map showing project and parcel boundaries, contours, and tree canopy locations. Visual Tree Assessment (VTA) was used to inspect trees. Species, diameter, and condition were recorded on trees having a diameter of 8-inches or greater at breast height (DBH) were inventoried and numbered. Information recorded for each of these trees included tree number, species, DBH, height and condition. Tree condition was rated “excellent”, “good”, “fair”, “poor”, and “dead” with “poor” meaning that that tree was dying due to a variety of conditions, and “dead” meaning that the tree has died and should be removed. A complete key of tree conditions are on the tree inventory table. This report is limited by:  Not all tree defects may be visible from observation position on the ground  Visual Tree Assessment (VTA) does not include diagnostic testing. III. RESULTS Tree Distribution The subject property contains six (6) trees of which four (4) are mitigated trees, see “Existing Tree Legend” for more tree information. Inventory A total of six (6) trees in the regulated size class (4-inches DBH and larger) were inventoried and recorded for this report. Information recorded included, number, species, DBH, height and condition. Inventory trees consists of two (2) Platanus racemose, California Sycamore, one (1) Platanus × acerifolia, London Plane, one (1) Juglans California, California Black Walnut, one (1) Quercus agrifolia, Coast Live Oak and one (1) Schinus mole, California Pepper. See “Tree Inventory Legend” for tree information also refer to “Tree Inventory Plans” sheet L-1 for location reference. Tree Inventory Table 7.1.c Packet Pg. 77 3 Protected Trees The subject property contains four (4) mitigated trees due to a DBH of 8” or higher. Protected trees consist of the following species two (2) #1 & #3 Platanus racemose, California Sycamore, one (1) #4 Quercus agrifolia, Coast Live Oak and one (1) #6 California Black Walnut trees. Two of the protected trees are scheduled to be removed. Protected trees to be removed consist of the following species one (1) #3 Platanus racemose, California Sycamore and one (1) #4 Quercus agrifolia, Coast Live Oak trees. Remainder protected trees will be protected in place per city of Diamond Bar tree protection ordinance. See “Tree Inventory Plans” sheet T-1 for reference. V. RECOMMENDATIONS  The following measures are recommended in order to minimize effects on existing trees to remain during construction activities.  Care should be taken to not change the grade of the trees to remain either by fill or grading. Any proposed grading within the drip line of trees.  For all protected trees that will remain #1 and #6 are going to be impacted by new construction, install a five feet (5’) high orange mesh fence around tree drip line before construction begins. Remove fence once construction has been fully completed. DEFINITION OF TREE CONDITION RATING Good  No trunk or root cavities or injuries p  No indication of hollowness  Root crown is at or slightly above grade  No decay present except for small stubs  Strong structure  Tapered trunk  No fungus evident  Below average amount of dead limbs  No co-dominant branching  No large callused areas, callusing intact  No evidence of large scale insect infestation  Average growth rate  No excessive limb weight  Normal foliage, tree not suppressed Fair  No decay in the root crown and no major decay in the trunk or limbs  Small cavities may be present  No fungus evident  Some small to moderate callusing injuries may be present  Some suppression or crowded growing conditions present  Average amount of dead wood limbs  Small cavities may be present 7.1.c Packet Pg. 78 4  Foliage size, color, and density may vary Poor  Significant cavities, dead areas, and decay present  Tree structurally defective  Decay present in the root crown or base of trunk  Fungus bodies present indicating internal decay  Dead limbs above normal  Co-dominant branching with included bark present  Foliage is below average in size and color  Pest damage may be present  VI. SITE PHOTOGRAPHS PICTURE # 1 1 2 6 5 3 4 7.1.c Packet Pg. 79 7.1.dPacket Pg. 80 Project Status Report CITY OF DIAMOND BAR May 25, 2021 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT LEGEND PH = PUBLIC HEARING X = NON PUBLIC HEARING AP = ASSIGNED PLANNER PC = PLANNING COMMISSION AR = ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW CC = CITY COUNCIL PROPERTY LOCATION PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW File # AP Applicant PC 5/25/21 CC 6/1/21 PC 6/8/21 CC 6/15/21 PC 6/22/21 CC 7/6/21 3333 Diamond Canyon Rd. (CUP for medical lab) CUP PL2021-18 MN Jordan Wang PH PH ADU Ordinance DCA PL2020-61 MN PH Review Of Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) GL Citywide X 20657 Golden Springs Dr. #111A (CUP for fitness studio) CUP PL2021-19 JT Steve Lee PH ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW Property Location AP Applicant None PENDING ITEMS Property Location File # AP Applicant Status 1625 Bears Den Rd. (Addition to single family residence) DR PL2021-01 MN/ JT Pete Volbeda First incomplete letter sent 2/5/21 – waiting for additional information Crooked Creek (7-unit subdivision) TTM, DR, CUP, TP PL2017-203 MN New Bridge Homes Third incomplete letter sent 4/8/21 – waiting for additional information 1114 S. Diamond Bar Blvd. (Veterinarian office) CUP PL2020-120 MN Dr. Ratul Kumar Under Review 1139 S. Diamond Bar Blvd., Ste F (CUP for fitness studio) CUP PL2021-30 JT Shawn Zuo Under Review 2335 S. Diamond Bar Blvd. (2-lot subdivision) TPM PL2021-15 JT Samir Khoury Under Review 2751 S. Diamond Bar Blvd. (Amendment to CUP PL2010-89 for after school component) CUP PL2021-39 JT Lance Kim Under Review 2252 Evergreen Springs (New single family residence) DR PL2021-37 MN Paul Kaitz Under Review 9.1 Packet Pg. 81 Project Status Report CITY OF DIAMOND BAR Page 2 May 25, 2021 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PENDING ITEMS (continued) Property Location File # AP Applicant Status 24011 Falcons View Dr. (Addition and remodel to single family residence) DR PL2020-25 MN William Edwards Third incomplete letter sent 1/29/21 – waiting for additional information Gentle Springs Ln. and S. Prospectors Rd. GPA, ZC, VTTM, DR PL2021-23 GL/ JT Tranquil Garden LLC First incomplete letter sent 4/16/21 – waiting for additional information 20657 Golden Springs Dr. (Sign program amendment) CUP PL2019-172 MN Sign Express Incomplete letter sent 10/10/19 – waiting for additional information 2234 Indian Creek Rd. (New single-family residence) DR PL2020-159 MN/ JT Jeffrey Sun First incomplete letter sent 1/12/21 – waiting for additional information 22909 Lazy Trail Rd. (Addition and remodel to single family residence) DR PL2021-5 JT Walt Petroske First incomplete letter sent 3/9/21 – waiting for additional information 22938 ½ Ridge Line Rd. (Wireless facility) CUP PL2020-42 NTE/ GL Jill Cleveland Incomplete letter sent 4/1/20 – waiting for additional information 23121 Ridge Line Rd. (New single family residence) DR PL2020-31 NTE/ MN Pete Volbeda Second incomplete letter sent 12/15/20 – waiting for additional information 23135 Ridge Line Rd. (New single family residence) DR PL2018-233 MN Faiz Ennabe Second incomplete letter sent 2/6/20 – waiting for additional information 2631 Rocky Trail Rd. (Addition and remodel to single family residence) DR, MCUP PL2021-22 GL Katy Liu First incomplete letter sent 4/15/21 – waiting for additional information 9.1 Packet Pg. 82 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING AND AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF DIAMOND BAR I, Stella Marquez, declare as follows: I am employed by the City of Diamond Bar, Community Development Department, On May 21, 2021, a copy of the May 25, 2021, Planning Commission Agenda, was posted at the following locations: SCAQMD/Government Center, 21865 Copley Drive Heritage Park, 2900 Brea Canyon Road City website: www,diamondbarca.gov Due to COVID-19 closures, the Planning Commission Agenda could not be posted at the following regular posting locations: Diamond Bar City Hall Diamond Bar Library I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed May 21, 2021, at Diamond Bar, California. Stella Marquez Community Development Department g:\\s\andevitposfing.dac