Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/26/2020 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA May 26, 2020 6:30 PM CONSISTENT WITH THE GOVERNOR’S LATEST EXECUTIVE ORDER TO STAY AT HOME, AVOID GATHERINGS AND MAINTAIN SOCIAL DISTANCING, THIS MEETING WILL BE CONDUCTED TELEPHONICALLY. MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISION AND CITY STAFF WILL BE PARTICIPATING VIA TELECONFERENCE, WHICH IS BEING RECORDED. YOU CAN PARTICIPATE IN THE MEETING BY VISITING: HTTPS://ATTENDEE.GOTOWEBINAR.COM/REGISTER/8964650 760831673100 +1 (415) 655 -0060 – Access: 885 -249 -548 Copies of staff reports or other written documentation relating to agenda items are on file in the Planning Division of the Community Development Department, located at 21810 Copley Drive, and are available for public inspection. If you have questions regarding an agenda item, please call (909) 839-7030 during regular business hours. Written materials distributed to the Planning Commission within 72 hours of the Planning Commission meeting are available for public inspection online at: http://diamondbarca.iqm2.com/Citizens/Default.aspx Chairperson Kenneth Mok Vice Chairperson William Rawlings Commissioner Naila Barlas Commissioner Mahendra Garg Commissioner Raymond Wolfe In an effort to comply with the requirements of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the City of Diamond Bar requires that any person in need of any type of special equipment, assistance or accommodation(s) in order to communicate at a City public meeting must inform the Community Development Department at (909) 839-7030 a minimum of 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting. The City of Diamond Bar uses recycled paper and encourages you to do the same City of Diamond Bar Planning Commission MEETING RULES PUBLIC INPUT The meetings of the Diamond Bar Planning Commission are open to the public. A member of the public may address the Commission on the subject of one or more agenda items and/or other items of which are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Diamond Bar Planning Commission. At this time, the teleconference moderator will ask callers one at a time to give their name and if there is an agenda item number they wish to speak on before providing their comment. If you wish to speak on a public hearing item or commission consideration item, you will then be called upon to speak at that point in the agenda. As a general rule, the opportunity for public comments will take place at the discretion of the Chairperson. However, in order to facilitate the meeting, persons who are interested parties for an item may be requested to give their presentation at the time the item is called on the calendar. The Chairperson may limit individual public input to five minutes on any item; or the Chairperson may limit the total amount of time allocated for public testimony based on the number of people requesting to speak and the business of the Commission. Individuals are requested to conduct themselves in a professional and businesslike manner. Comments and questions are welcome so that all points of view are considered prior to the Commission making recommendations to the staff and City Council. When speaking, please direct y our questions and comments to the Commission, not to staff or other members of the public. In accordance with State Law (Brown Act), all matters to be acted on by the Commission must be posted at least 72 hours prior to the Commission meeting. In case of emergency or when a subject matter arises subsequent to the posting of the agenda, upon making certain findings, the Commission may act on item that is not on the posted agenda. INFORMATION RELATING TO AGENDAS AND ACTIONS OF THE COMMISSION Agendas for Diamond Bar Planning Commission meetings are prepared by the Planning Division of the Community Development Department. Every meeting of the Planning Commission is recorded and duplicate recordings are available for a nominal charge. HELPFUL CONTACT INFORMATION Copies of Agenda, Rules of the Commission, CDs of Meetings (909) 839-7030 Email: info@diamondbarca.gov Website: www.diamondbarca.gov Consistent with the Governor’s latest Executive Order to stay at home, avoid gatherings and maintain social distancing, this meeting will be conducted telephonically and Members of the Planning Commission and City staff will be participating via Teleconference. There will be no physical meeting location. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR PLANNING COMMISSION May 26, 2020 AGENDA Next Resolution No. 2020-12 CALL TO ORDER: 6:30 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: 1. ROLL CALL: COMMISSIONERS: Naila Barlas, Mahendra Garg, Raymond Wolfe, Vice Chairperson William Rawlings, Chairperson Kenneth Mok 2. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is the time and place for the general public to address the members of the Planning Commission on any item that is within its jurisdiction, allowing the public an opportunity to speak on non-public hearing and non-agenda items. At this time, the teleconference moderator will ask callers one at a time to give their name and if there is an agenda item number they wish to speak on before providing their comment. If you wish to speak on a public hearing item or commission consideration item, you will then be called upon to speak at that point in the agenda 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Chairperson 4. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following items listed on the consent calendar are considered routine and are approved by a single motion. Consent calendar items may be removed from the agenda by request of the Commission only: 4.1. Minutes of Planning Commission – May 12, 2020 5. OLD BUSINESS: MAY 26, 2020 PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION 6. NEW BUSINESS: 6.1 Review of Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) - Conformity with the General Plan. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution finding the proposed Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Capital Improvement Program in conformance with the General Plan. 6.2 New CEQA Vehicle Miles Traveled “VMT” Transportation Thresholds RECOMMENDATION: Review the parameters presented for adopting VMT as the analytical tool in determining a project’s transportation impact under CEQA; review the thresholds presented by staff to be used as part of a VMT analysis; and adopt a Resolution recommending the City Council adopt these parameters and thresholds. 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS: NONE 8. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS / INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 9. STAFF COMMENTS / INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 10. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: *Until further notice and consistent with the Governor’s latest Executive Order to stay at home, all City meetings will be conducted telephonically. PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING: Thursday, May 28, 2020 Cancelled due to lack of business CITY COUNCIL MEETING: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 – 6:30 pm PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: Tuesday, June 9, 2020 – 6:30 pm CITY COUNCIL MEETING: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 – 6:30 pm PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 – 6:30 pm 4th OF JULY HOLIDAY: Friday, July 3, 2020 In observance of the holiday, city offices will be closed. City offices will re-open on Monday, July 6, 2020 MAY 26, 2020 PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION 11. ADJOURNMENT: TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING: Thursday, July 10, 2020 – 6:30 pm MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 12, 2020 CONSISTENT WITH THE GOVERNOR’S LATEST EXECUTIVE ORDER TO STAY AT HOME, AVOID GATHERINGS AND MAINTAIN SOCIAL DISTANCING, THIS MEETING WAS CONDUCTED TELEPHONICALLY AND PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, CITY STAFF AND MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC PARTICIPATED VIA TELECONFERENCE. CALL TO ORDER: Chair/Mok called the meeting to order at 6:32 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Chair/Mok led the Pledge of Allegiance. 1. ROLL CALL: Commissioners: Naila Barlas, Mahendra Garg, Kenneth Mok, William Rawlings, and Raymond Wolfe Staff Members Participating: Greg Gubman, Community Development Director; James Eggart, Assistant City Attorney; Grace Lee, Senior Planner, May Nakajima, Associate Planner; and Stella Marquez, Administrative Coordinator 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS: None 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: As presented. 4. CONSENT CALENDAR: 4.1 Minutes – Regular Meeting – April 28, 2020. C/Wolfe moved, C/Barlas seconded, to approve the April 28, 2020, Meeting Minutes as submitted. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Barlas, Garg, Wolfe, VC/Rawlings, Chair/Mok NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None 5. OLD BUSINESS: None 6. NEW BUSINESS: None 7. PUBLIC HEARING(S): 7.1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. PL2017-69 – Under the authority of Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.58, the applicant, Christopher Yoo, Black & Veatch for Verizon Wireless, requested a Conditional Use Permit to remove an existing street light pole and replace it with a new small cell wireless 4.1 Packet Pg. 6 ________________________________________________________________________ MAY 12, 2020 PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION ________________________________________________________________________ telecommunications facility consisting of one canister antenna and four remote radio units (RRUs) mounted on a new 29’-3” high street light pole and, related underground equipment within the public right-of-way on the southeast corner of Grand Avenue and Golden Springs Drive. PROJECT ADDRESS: Public Right-of-Way on Grand Avenue Adjacent to Golden Springs Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 POLE OWNER: Southern California Edison 2 Innovation Way, 1st Floor Pomona, CA 91768 APPLICANT: Christopher Yoo Black & Veatch for Verizon Wireless 5 Peters Canyon Road #300 Irvine, CA 92606 AP/Nakajima presented staff’s report and recommended Planning Commission approval of Conditional Use Permit No. PL2017-69, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the Resolution. C/Garg said that since the new pole will be located four feet north of the existing pole, he wanted assurance that there was a study to make sure the roadway lighting levels would be the same or better after the repositioning of the light source. Chair/Mok opened the public hearing. Chris Yoo, applicant, said he was speaking in support of the Verizon application CUP No. PL2017-69 and that Michael Ferrer from Verizon was with him. He thanked AP/Nakajima for her assistance during this process and thanked the Commissioners for their time tonight. With respect to C/Garg’s question and concern, there are no numbers available; however, they are matching like for like with Southern California Edison’s light. He said photometric studies can be done if that is required as a condition of approval. C/Garg responded that he wanted the study done. Mr. Yoo responded that he would get the information for C/Garg and the Commission as a condition of approval. CDD/Gubman explained to C/Garg that the Commission could add conditions of approval at the time of its motion. 4.1 Packet Pg. 7 ________________________________________________________________________ MAY 12, 2020 PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION ________________________________________________________________________ Chair/Mok closed the public hearing. C/Barlas said she was pleased to know the service would be approved in the area of the project and she is okay with the addition of C/Garg’s condition. C/Wolfe said that while it would not alter his vote to add the condition proposed by C/Garg, he felt it was unnecessary because he was confident that staff had addressed that issue during the permit process. ACA/Eggart offered language for C/Garg’s proposed condition of approval. C/Barlas moved, C/Garg seconded, to approve Conditional Use Permit No. PL2017-69, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the Resolution, with the addition of a condition to submit a photometric study demonstrating that the illumination level of the new street light pole is not materially different from the existing, subject to approval by the Community Development Director. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Barlas, Garg, Wolfe, VC/Rawlings, Chair/Mok NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None 8. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: C/Wolfe said he hoped the stay-at-home orders would be lifted at some point in the future although he is hearing that LA County may lag behind other local counties in the region. He wondered if any effort had been put forth to look at reducing the packet size or creating an electronic packet which would reduce the need to have staff drop off packets at Commissioners’ houses and reduce copying costs. 9. STAFF COMMENTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 9.1 Project Status Report. CDD/Gubman said that as a follow up to C/Wolfe’s question and recommendation, if any of the Commissioners would prefer an electronic agenda packet, he would like for them to email him and he will follow up and make that available to the Commissioners going forward. CDD/Gubman stated that there are currently two items on the agenda for the next Commission meeting which is scheduled for May 26 th. Staff will present 4.1 Packet Pg. 8 ________________________________________________________________________ MAY 12, 2020 PAGE 4 PLANNING COMMISSION ________________________________________________________________________ the Capital Improvement Program for FY 2020/21 for a Finding of General Plan Consistency prior to City Council’s action to adopt the budget for the CIP. In addition, beginning July 1 there will be a change to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) regarding traffic impacts. In the past, traffic impacts to projects have been measured based on traffic congestion and how much a project results in increases in traffic delays at intersections. Beginning July 1st that will no longer be an environmental impact under CEQA and instead, projects will be evaluated in terms of what kind of inducem ent to vehicle miles traveled the project will result in , which will be explained at the May 26th meeting by staff with the assistance of the City’s Traffic Consultant from Fehr & Peers. 10. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: As listed in the agenda. ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Planning Commission, Chair/Mok adjourned the regular meeting at 6:57 p.m. The foregoing minutes are hereby approved this 26th day of May, 2020. Attest: Respectfully Submitted, __________________________________ Greg Gubman Community Development Director _______________________________ Kenneth Mok, Chairperson 4.1 Packet Pg. 9 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 6.1 MEETING DATE: May 26, 2020 CASE/FILE NUMBER: Review of Proposed FY 2020-2021 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Conformity with the General Plan ______________________________________________________________________ BACKGROUND: Each year, prior to the adoption of the City’s annual budget, the Planning Commission reviews the proposed fiscal year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for consistency with the City’s General Plan and adopts a resolution to record its findings. The process is mandated pursuant to California Government Code Section 65401 (see Attachment 2). The COVID-19 pandemic has created uncertainty in revenue streams used to fund CIP projects. Therefore, the proposed Fiscal Year (FY) 2020-2021 CIP has been limited in scope and only includes those essential projects that can be accommodated within the lower than anticipated revenues. A second list of CIP projects has been prepared that represents other projects that are being deferred. Should the revenue estimates improve over the course of the year, amendments to the CIP could be presented to the City Council to advance some or all of the deferred projects. ANALYSIS: The proposed FY 2020-2021 CIP is detailed in Attachment 4, and is comprised of the following expenditures: CIP FY2020-2021 Expenditures • Street Improvements $1,460,634 • Traffic Management/Safety Improvements $107,000 • Transportation Infrastructure Improvements $100,000 • Miscellaneous Public Works Improvements $1,441,900 • Parks and Rec. Improvements $212,780 Total: $3,322,314 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ~ 21810 COPLEY DRIVE ~ DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 ~ TEL. (909) 839-7030 ~ FAX (909) 861-3117 6.1 Packet Pg. 10 Review of Proposed FY 2020-2021 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Conformity with the General Plan Page 2 of 6 These capital improvement projects are funded by various sources: the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (SB-1); Measure M; Proposition A; Proposition C; SB 821 – Bike and Pedestrian Paths (TDA); Quimby Funds; Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds; Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee (MRSC) Grant funding; the Building and Facilities Maintenance Fund; and Foothill Transit Grant funding. Deferred Projects The proposed Fiscal Year (FY) 2020-2021 Deferred CIP is detailed in Attachment 5, and is comprised of the following expenditures: DEFERRED CIP FY2020-2021 Expenditures • Street Improvements $2,900,000 • Miscellaneous Public Works Improvements $387,000 • Parks and Rec. Improvements $977,720 Total: $4,264,720 These deferred capital improvement projects are funded by various sources: General Fund reserves; Measure W; SB-1; Measure M; Measure R (Local Return Fund); Gasoline Tax funds; Proposition C; Measure A; Habitat Conservation Grant funds; cost reimbursements from City of Industry; FEMA; and the Building and Facilities Maintenance Fund. The Public Works Department develops the project list based on identified community improvement needs. Planning staff finds that the proposed FY2020 -2021 CIP is consistent with the adopted General Plan 2040’s numerous Goals and Policies, including, but not limited to, the following: GENERAL PLAN ELEMENT GOALS & POLICIES Land Use & Economic Development LU-P-14, LU-P-51 Community Character & Placemaking CC-P-4, CC-P-64 Circulation CR-P-1, CR-P-20, CR-P-26, CR-P-36, CR-P-48 Resource Conservation RC-G-2, RC-G-3, RC-G-7, RC-P-5, RC-P-22 Public Facilities & Services PF-P-18 Public Safety PS-G-12, PS-P-51 Community Health & Sustainability CHS-P-38, CHS-P-41 The full text of the above Goals and Policies are provided in the attached Resolution. 6.1 Packet Pg. 11 Review of Proposed FY 2020-2021 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Conformity with the General Plan Page 3 of 6 Capital Improvement Projects Below is a summary of the various projects proposed under the FY2020 -2021 CIP: Street Improvement Projects • Road Maintenance Projects – Grind and overlay, slurry seal or chip seal maintenance is applied to designated roadways within the City. This type of maintenance activity is applied annually to residential streets and art erial roadways on an eight-year cycle per neighborhood to extend the life of the existing road pavement; and the appropriate pavement markings are re-established (see Attachment 3). Road Maintenance improvements also include curb ramp upgrades with sidewalk, curb and gutter repairs as necessary. o Arterial Street Rehabilitation Diamond Bar Blvd. (Mountain Laurel to Pathfinder) - Construction is expected to be completed in October 2020. This is a carryover project from FY2019-2020. o Residential & Collectors Road Maintenance, Design Only – Area 1, 2, and arterial roadways (Design began in November 2019 with an estimated completion in August 2020 and construction phase to begin in August 2020). This is a carryover project from FY2019-2020. o CDBG Area 2 ADA Curb Ramp Project – This project will rehabilitate curb ramps within the boundaries of Area 2. This is a new project for FY2020 -2021 that will begin after January 1, 2021 with completion prior to the construction of the Residential and Collector Road Maintenance-Area 2 in July 2021. o Residential & Collector Road Maintenance – Area 1 (DEFERRED). This is a new project for FY2020-2021. o Arterial Street Rehabilitation Golden Springs (Brea Canyon to Lemon) (DEFERRED) – This is a carryover project from FY2019-2020. Traffic Management/Safety Projects • Battery Backup System – To protect against black-outs at signalized intersections during a power loss, the final eleven intersections in Diamond Bar without the battery backup system will be retrofitted with auxiliary, battery power. The construction will be completed in September 2020. This is a carryover project from FY2019 -2020. Transportation Infrastructure Improvements • Lemon Avenue Quiet Zone – A quiet zone is a section of rail line, at least one-half mile in length, that contains one or more consecutive public highway/rail grade crossings where the use of train horns near the crossings is either eliminated or 6.1 Packet Pg. 12 Review of Proposed FY 2020-2021 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Conformity with the General Plan Page 4 of 6 reduced. The Lemon Avenue railroad crossing owned by the Union Pacific Railroad Company (UPRR) and used by Southern California Regional Rail Road Authority (Metrolink) is to be studied in mutual effort between the City of Diamond Bar and City of Industry for a quiet zone designation. Train horns may be sounded in emergency situations or to comply with Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) rules, which require that locomotive horns be sounded 15-20 seconds before entering public highway/rail grade crossings, no more than one-quarter mile in advance, even within a quiet zone. The study is anticipated to be completed by December 2020. This is a carryover project from FY2019-2020. • Bus Shelter Replacement at Golden Springs Road and Calbourne Drive –The City will capitalize on the Foothill Transit’s Bus Stop Enhancement Program (BSEP) grant to replace the existing bus shelters and amenities in February 2021. This is a new project for FY2020-2021. Miscellaneous Public Works Improvements • Grand/Golden Springs Intersection Enhancements – As part of the required mitigation improvements for the development north of the 57/60 confluence area, the intersection of Grand Ave. and Golden Springs Drive will be widened by the City of Industry. In conjunction with the widening of the intersection, Diamond Bar will implement landscape and hardscape elements with decorative traffic signals that have been incorporated at the Grand Ave/Diamond Bar Blvd., Grand Ave./Longview Dr. and Diamond Bar Blvd./Brea Canyon Road intersections. Construction is tentatively to begin in May 2020 with an 18-month construction schedule. This is a carryover project from FY2019-2020. • Electric Charging Station at City Hall—This project will install an electric vehicle charging station at City Hall to be available for City electric vehicles and the public when possible. The project is being funded by Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee (MSRC) funds and a match from SCAQMD AB2766 funds. This is a carryover project from FY2019-2020. • Groundwater Drainage Improvements Phase 3 (DEFERRED) – In FY2014-15, a Comprehensive Groundwater Drainage Study was completed identifying and evaluating various roadway locations with groundwater conditions that warrant drainage improvements. Eleven locations were evaluated as listed below: o Groundwater under Cold Springs Lane just east of Diamond Ba r Boulevard. o Groundwater drainage onto Flapjack Drive through the curb core at the end of the cul-de-sac. o Ambushers Street groundwater through existing parkway drains. o Golden Springs Drive sidewalk drainage near Rancheria Road (Northminster Church)—Completed. o Brea Canyon Road sidewalk drainage near Sapphire Lane (Edison Pole Drainage)—Completed. 6.1 Packet Pg. 13 Review of Proposed FY 2020-2021 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Conformity with the General Plan Page 5 of 6 o Drainage onto Copley Drive in front of City Hall through the parkway drain. o 20834 Moonlake drainage through the parkway drain. o 20532 Calpet drainage through the parkway drain. o Groundwater under Cleghorn Drive just north of Grand Avenue. o Brea Canyon Cut-Off at Oak Crest Drive—Completed. o Seepage and poor surface drainage at 21325 Hipass Drive —Completed. In the upcoming year, the drainage system for Flapjack Drive (Pha se 3) will be designed and constructed, contingent on the receipt of Measure W funds. Design will include adding inlets and storm drain laterals to provide for conveyance of groundwater into existing storm drain systems. Facility, Parks and Recreation Improvements • Design of Canyon Loop Trail – A 1,29 mile trail in the open space adjacent to the Diamond Bar Center that can be accessed from the Grandview Trail and the Steep Canyon Trail needs extensive improvements. Design is scheduled for completion b y the end of 2020 and construction will commence in early 2021 This is a carryover project from FY2019-2020. • Construction of Canyon Loop Trail mentioned above (DEFERRED). • Heritage Park New Roof – The main roof at Heritage Park has reached the end of its useful life and is scheduled to be replaced during FY2020 -2021. • Design of DBC Slope Stabilization Project – The slope at Diamond Bar Center has been moving and needs to be stabilized. Design may begin July 2020 and construction may commence in early 2021. This is a carryover project from FY2019- 2020. • Construction of DBC Slope Stabilization Project mentioned above (DEFEERED). • Sycamore Canyon Creek Repair (DEFERRED)—During the 2017 storm event, Sycamore Canyon Creek within Sycamore Canyon Park experienc ed severe erosion. To prevent further erosion, repairs to the creek lining will be performed. The project is expected to be completed in October 2020. This is a carryover project from FY2019-2020. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Comm ission adopt Resolution No. 2020-XX finding the proposed FY 2020-2021 Capital Improvement Program in conformance with the City’s General Plan. PREPARED BY: 6.1 Packet Pg. 14 Review of Proposed FY 2020-2021 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Conformity with the General Plan Page 6 of 6 REVIEWED BY: Attachments: A. Draft Resolution No. 2020-XX B. CA Government Code Section 65401 C. Two-Year Slurry Seal Street Moratorium Map D. FY2020-2021 CIP Project List E. FY2020-2021 Deferred CIP Project List 6.1 Packet Pg. 15 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2020-XX A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT THE PROPOSED FISCAL YEAR 2020-2021 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) IS CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65401. A. RECITALS 1. WHEREAS, on April 18, 1989, the City of Diamond Bar was established as a duly organized municipal corporation of the State of California. 2. WHEREAS, on July 25, 1995, the City of Diamond Bar adopted its General Plan incorporating all State mandated elements, and portions of the General Plan have been updated from time to time. 3. WHEREAS, on December 17, 2019, the City of Diamond Bar adopted its comprehensive update of the General Plan (“General Plan 2040”). 4. WHEREAS, the City Manager of the City of Diamond Bar has prepared a proposed Capital Improvement Program and Budget for the City’s 2020-2021 Fiscal Year which outlines a program identifying proposed public works improvement projects to occur during the fiscal year. The projects include, but are not limited to, street and highway improvements, traffic signal modifications, and park improvements. 5. WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 65401 requires the Planning Commission to review proposed public works projects for the ensuing fiscal year to determine compliance with the City’s General Plan. 6. WHEREAS, on May 26,2020, at a regularly scheduled meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed and considered the City of Diamond Bar’s proposed Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Capital Improvement Program, and the projects contained therein, and concluded said review prior to the adoption of this Resolution. B. RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: 1. This Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the facts and evidence presented during the Planning Commission meeting regarding the City’s proposed Fiscal Year 20 20-2021 Capital Improvement Program, including oral and documentary evidence provided by City staff, and in accordance with the provisions of California Government Code Section 65401, the Planning Commission hereby finds as follows: 6.1.a Packet Pg. 16 2 PC Resolution No. 2020-XX (a) The projects identified in the City’s proposed Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Capital Improvement Program, are consistent with the City’s General Plan 2040’s numerous goals and policies adopted December 17, 2019, including, but not limited to, the following: (i) Land Use & Economic Development Element • Policy LU-P-14 – Improve vehicular accessibility, traffic flow, and parking availability as well as pedestrian and bicycle access and amenities within office, commercial, and industrial areas. • Policy LU-P-51 – Provide streetscape and intersection improvements along Golden Springs Drive to enhance comfort and safety for all modes of travel and increase accessibility to and from surrounding areas. (ii) Community Character & Placemaking Element • Policy CC-P-4 – Continue to support community identity with streetscape improvement and beautification projects in both existing residential areas and commercial centers, as well as new mixed-use areas that incorporate unified landscaping and pedestrian amenities. Amenities should include seating, bus shelters, pedestrian safety treatments such as sidewalk bulb- outs and widening and improved crosswalks, and city-branded decorative elements such as street lighting, concrete pavers, tree grates, and theme rails. • Policy CC-P-64 – Provide streetscape and intersection improvements along Golden Springs Drive to enhance comfort and safety for all modes of travel and increase accessibility to and from surrounding areas. (iii) Circulation Element • Policy CR-P-1 – When redesigning streets, plan for the needs of different modes by incorporating elements such as shade for pedestrians, safe pedestrian-friendly crossings/intersections, lighting at the pedestrian scale, bike lanes, signage visible to relevant modes, transit amenities, etc. • Policy CR-P-20 – Implement measures such as additional signal timing and synchronization, speed limit regulations, and ITS techniques to increase safety and reduce congestion. Maintain a pavement management system and maintenance program for all public roadways throughout the City. • Policy CR-P-26 – As opportunities arise, coordinate with other jurisdictions, including neighboring cities, Los Angeles County, San Bernardino County, and Caltrans, on improvements to street 6.1.a Packet Pg. 17 3 PC Resolution No. 2020-XX segments common to the City of Diamond Bar and other jurisdictions. • Policy CR-P-36 – Where appropriate, plant street trees and provide landscaping along major pedestrian and bicycle routes to provide shade and barriers between cyclists and motorists, as well as enhance aesthetics. • Policy CR-P-48 – As opportunities arise, coordinate with Foothill Transit to maintain and improve bus stops and shelters, as well as identify areas where service can be improved or expanded to increase system use. (iv) Resource Conservation Element • Goal RC-G-2 – Seek to link the various elements of the open space network through the development of an integrated system of trails and greenways. • Goal RC-G-3 – Preserve to the extent possible open space ridgelines, hilltops, and prominent slopes for aesthetic, biological and natural resource conservation, and safety purposes. • Policy RC-P-5 – Link parks, open spaces, and regional hiking trails with a trail network where feasible, acknowledging topographical constraints and other barriers. Incorporate existing trails and bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure, working with willing landowners to prioritize land acquisition where necessary. Where possible, incorporate landscaping and enhance natural features to create greenways along the trail network. • Goal RC-G-7 – Protect waterways—including creeks, riverines, artesian springs, seeps, and wetlands—and watersheds in Diamond Bar from pollution and degradation as a result of urban activities. • Policy RC-P-22 – Protect and, where feasible, enhance or restore the City’s waterways and drainages, preventing erosion along the banks, removing litter and debris, and promoting riparian vegetation and buffers. (v) Public Facilities & Services Element • Policy PF-P-18 – Where feasible, link parks, open spaces, and regional hiking trails with a trail network. Incorporate existing trails and bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure, working with willing landowners to prioritize land acquisition where 6.1.a Packet Pg. 18 4 PC Resolution No. 2020-XX necessary. Where possible, incorporate landscaping and enhance natural features. (vi) Public Safety Element • Goal PS-G-12 – Support measures to reduce noise emission by motor vehicles, aircraft, and trains. • Policy PS-P-51 – Coordinate with the Union Pacific Railroad and other agencies and private entities to consider the implementation of a railroad quiet zone and other methods of reducing railroad noise impacts on surrounding noise-sensitive uses along the Union Pacific Railroad line adjacent to the city. (vii) Community Health & Sustainability Element • Policy CHS-P-38 – Promote the adoption of rooftop and parking lot solar power and/or other alternative energy usage on developed sites in Diamond Bar through actions such as: a. Establishing incremental growth goals for solar power/alternative energy systems in Diamond Bar; b. Developing guidelines, recommendations, and examples for cost-effective solar and/or other alternative energy- based installation; and c. Installing solar/alternative energy technology on existing City facilities. • Policy CHS-P-41 – Support the use of clean fuel and “climate friendly” vehicles in order to reduce energy use, energy cost, and greenhouse gas emissions by residents, businesses, and City government activities. (b) The proposed projects comply with all other applicable requ irements of State law and local ordinances, regulations, and standards; and (c) The proposed Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Capital Improvement Program is found to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), under Se ction 15301 of the CEQA Guidelines (operation, repair, maintenance of existing facilities). 3. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth above, this Resolution shall serve as the Planning Commission’s report to the City Council regarding the General Plan conformity of the proposed public works projects in the City’s Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Capital Improvement Program as required by California Government Code Section 65401. 6.1.a Packet Pg. 19 5 PC Resolution No. 2020-XX The Planning Commission shall: (a) Certify as to the adoption of this Resolution; and (b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution to the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar for use in its deliberations regarding the City’s budget. ADOPTED AND APPROVED THIS 26th DAY OF MAY, 2020, BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. ______________________________ Kenneth Mok, Chairman I, Greg Gubman, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of May, 2020, by the following vote to wit: AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: ABSTAIN: Commissioners: ATTEST: ______________________________ Greg Gubman, Secretary 6.1.a Packet Pg. 20 CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65401 Review of Capital Improvement Projects for Conformity with the General Plan If a general plan or part thereof has been adopted, within such time as may be fixed by the legislative body, each county or city officer, department, board, or commission, and each governmental body, commission, or board, including the governing body of any special district or school district, whose jurisdiction lies wholly or partially within the county or city, whose functions include recommending, preparing plans for, or constructing, major public works, shall submit to the official agency, as designated by the respective county board of supervisors or city council, a list of the proposed public works recommended for planning, initiation or construction during the ensuing fiscal year. The official agency receiving the list of proposed public works shall list and classify all such recommendations and shall prepare a coordinated program of proposed public works for the ensuing fiscal year. Such coordinated program shall be submitted to the county or city planning agency for review and report to said official agency as to conformity with the adopted general plan or part thereof. 6.1.b Packet Pg. 21 ZONE AREA 7* AREA 6* AREA 5 AREA 4 AREA 3 AREA 2 AREA 1B AREA 1A TREATMENT YEAR 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 MORATORIUM* Revised 9-11-2019 NOTE: THIS MAP REPRESENTS RESIDENTIAL AND COLLECTOR STREET MORATORIUMS ONLY. MORATORIUMS ARE PLACED ON STREETS THAT HAVE BEEN RECONSTRUCTED OR SLURRY SEALED AND LAST 2 YEARS AFTER CONSTRUCTION. Arterial Road Moratoriums: Diamond Bar Blvd Between Mountain Laurel Way & Clear Creek Canyon Dr. Note: Blue lines indicate streets that have been SlurrySealed and last 2 years after construction. Green linesshows streets that have been Cape Sealed and last 5years after construction. AREA 1 AREA 2 AREA 3 AREA 4 AREA 5 AREA 6 AREA 7 6.1.c Packet Pg. 22 FY 2020/2021 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS BUDGET Exhibit 1a Street Improvement Projects (250-5510-46411) Project #Project Description Status Total FY Budget (108) RMRA (109) Measure M (110) Measure R Local Return (111) Gas Tax (113) Prop C (121) Hauler Fees (125) CDBG 01420 * Residential and Collector Street Rehab.- Area 1a, 1b, 2 (Design) Arterial Street Rehab (Design) (DBB from Pathfinder to Mountain Laurel) (Golden Springs from Brea Canyon to Lemon) (Golden Springs from Grand to BCY) Carryover - In Design 82,779$ 82,779$ 02120 *Arterial Street Rehab (DBB from Pathfinder to Mountain Laurel Way) (Const.)Carryover - In Design 1,200,000$ 1,200,000$ CDBG Area 2 ADA Curb Ramp Project (Const.)New 177,855$ 177,855$ Total - Street Improvement Projects 1,460,634$ 1,200,000$ 82,779$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 177,855$ Traffic Management/Safety Projects (250-5510-46412) Project #Project Description Total FY Budget (109) Measure M (111) Gas Tax (112) Prop A (113) Prop C 24120 *Battery Back Up System- Final 11 Locations (Design and Construction)Carryover 107,000$ -$ 53,500$ 53,500$ Total - Traffic Projects 107,000$ -$ -$ 53,500$ 53,500$ Transportation Infrastructure Improvements (250-5510-46413) Project #Project Description Total FY Budget (113) Prop C Foothill Transit Grant 23318 *Lemon Avenue Quiet Zone Carryover 60,000$ 60,000$ 23420 *Bus Shelter Replacement - GSD/Calbourne Carryover 40,000$ 40,000$ Total-Transportation Infrastructure Improvements 100,000$ 60,000$ 40,000$ Miscellaneous PW Improvements (250-5510-46420) Project #Project Description Total FY Budget (107) Measure W (108) RMRA (109) Measure M (113) Prop C (116) Traffic Imp Fund (117) Sewer Imp Fund (118) AB2766 (119) TDA MSRC Grant 22818 *Grand/GSD Intersection Enhancement (Construction)Carryover 1,378,040$ 876,811$ 207,691$ 219,443$ 74,095$ 26319 *Electric Charging Station at City Hall Carryover 63,860$ 24,930$ 38,930$ Total-Miscellaneous PW Improvements 1,441,900$ -$ 876,811$ 207,691$ 219,443$ -$ -$ 24,930$ 74,095$ 38,930$ Facilities, Parks and Rec Improvements (250-5556-46415) Project #Project Description Total Budget Habitat Conserv Grant (31814) (001) GF Reserves (122) Quimby (124) Park Dev Fund (107) Measure W (132) Measure A (540) Building & Facilities Fund 25517 *Canyon Loop Trail (Design)Carryover - In Design 37,780$ -$ 37,780 -$ 25120 *DBC Slope Stabilization Project (Design)Carryover - In Design 75,000$ 75,000 Heritage Park - New Roof New 100,000$ 100,000 TOTAL 212,780$ -$ -$ 37,780$ -$ -$ -$ 175,000$ FY 20-21 CIP Projects Grand Total 3,322,314$ Funding Source Totals 108 RMRA (SB-1)2,076,811 CIP Project Type Totals 109 Measure M 290,470 Street Improvements 1,460,634 111 Gas Tax Fund - Traffic Management/Safety Improvements 107,000 112 Prop A 53,500 Transportation Infrastructure Improvements 100,000 113 Prop C 332,943 Miscellaneous PW Improvements 1,441,900 116 Traffic Mitigation - Facilites, Parks and Rec. Improvements 212,780 118 AB2766 24,930 3,322,314$ 119 SB 821 Fund - Bike and Pedestrian Paths (TDA)74,095 122 Quimby Funds 37,780 125 CDBG Funds 177,855 250 MSRC Grant 38,930 540 Building & Facilities Maintenance Fund 175,000 250 Foothill Transit Grant 40,000 3,322,314$ 1 6.1.d Packet Pg. 23 FY 2020/2021 DEFERRED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS BUDGET Exhibit 1b Street Improvement Projects (250-5510-46411) Project #Project Description Status Total FY Budget (108) RMRA (109) Measure M (110) Measure R Local Return (111) Gas Tax (113) Prop C (121) Hauler Fees (125) CDBG 01421 Residential and Collector Street Rehab - Area 1 (Const.)New 2,000,000$ 925,000$ 850,000$ 89,000$ 136,000$ Arterial Street Rehab (Golden Springs from Brea Canyon to Lemon Ave.) (Const.)New 900,000$ 500,000$ 400,000$ Total - Street Improvement Projects 2,900,000$ 500,000$ 925,000$ 850,000$ 89,000$ 400,000$ 136,000$ -$ Traffic Management/Safety Projects (250-5510-46412) Project #Project Description Total FY Budget (109) Measure M (111) Gas Tax (112) Prop A (113) Prop C No Deferred Projects Carryover -$ Total - Traffic Projects -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Transportation Infrastructure Improvements (250-5510-46413) Project #Project Description Total FY Budget No Deferred Projects -$ -$ Total-Transportation Infrastructure Improvements -$ -$ -$ Miscellaneous PW Improvements (250-5510-46420) Project #Project Description Total FY Budget (107) Measure W (108) RMRA (109) Measure M (113) Prop C (116) Traffic Imp Fund (117) Sewer Imp Fund (118) AB2766 (119) TDA MSRC Grant 26019 *Groundwater Drainage Improvements-Phase 3 (Flapjack-Design)Carryover 65,000$ 65,000$ 26019 *Groundwater Drainage Improvements-Phase 3 (Flapjack-Construction)Carryover 322,000$ 322,000$ Total-Miscellaneous PW Improvements 387,000$ 387,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Facilities, Parks and Rec Improvements (250-5556-46415) Project #Project Description Total Budget Habitat Conserv Grant (31814) (001) GF Reserves (122) Quimby (124) Park Dev Fund (107) Measure W (132) Measure A (540) Building & Facilities Fund 25517 *Canyon Loop Trail (Construction)New 447,720$ 229,720$ 33,000$ 185,000$ 25819 *Sycamore Canyon Creek Repair Carryover - In Design 80,000$ 80,000$ 25120 DBC Slope Stabilization (Construction)GF Reserves 450,000$ 450,000 TOTAL 977,720$ 229,720$ 80,000$ -$ -$ 33,000$ 185,000$ 450,000$ FY 20-21 CIP Projects Grand Total 4,264,720$ Funding Source Totals CIP Project Type Totals 001 General Fund Reserves 80,000 Street Improvements 2,900,000 107 Measure W 420,000 Traffic Management/Safety Improvements 0 108 RMRA (SB-1)500,000 Transportation Infrastructure Improvements 0 109 Measure M 925,000 Miscellaneous PW Improvements 387,000 110 Measure R - Local Return Fd 850,000 Facilites, Parks and Rec. Improvements 977,720 111 Gas Tax Fund 89,000 4,264,720$ 113 Prop C 400,000 132 Measure A 185,000 250 Habitat Conservation Grant 229,720 540 Building & Facilities Maintenance Fund 450,000 4,264,720$ 1 6.1.e Packet Pg. 24 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 6.2 MEETING DATE: May 26, 2020 CASE/FILE NUMBER: New CEQA VMT Transportation Thresholds BACKGROUND: Changes in state law require the City to adopt new California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) thresholds of significance for transportation impacts. For the purposes of CEQA, these changes will modify how the City evaluates projects for transportation impacts. Specifically, the City is required to use Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) instead of Level of Service (LOS) as the metric to evaluate transportation impacts in CEQA documents such as Environmental Impact Reports and Mitigated Negative Declarations. Outside of the CEQA process, the City can choose to continue to evaluate projects using the LOS metric. Based on guidance provided through an implementation process led by the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG), City staff prepared new CEQA transportation impact thresholds for consideration by the Planning Commission and City Council. This report summarizes the state mandate that requires modifying the CEQA thresholds, discusses the City staff recommendations, and includes a draft Resolution to adopt the new CEQA transportation thresholds. State Mandate On September 27, 2013, Governor Jerry Brown signed SB 743 into law and started a process intended to fundamentally change how transportation impact analysis is conducted as part of the CEQA review of projects. SB 743 eliminates LOS as the basis for determining transportation impacts under CEQA and requires the use of VMT instead. The state is shifting the focus of CEQA traffic analysis from measuring a project’s impact on automobile delay (LOS) to measuring the amount and distance of automobile travel that is attributable to a project (VMT). The State’s goal in changing the metric used to determine a significant transportation impact is to encourage land use and transportation decisions that reduce greenhouse gas emissions, encourage infill development, and improve public health through active transportation. To implement the legislation, lead agencies will need to determine appropriate VMT methodologies, thresholds, and feasible mitigation measures. Since VMT is a new methodology to analyze transportation impacts, there was a need to develop CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ~ 21810 COPLEY DRIVE ~ DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 ~ TEL. (909) 839-7030 ~ FAX (909) 861-3117 6.2 Packet Pg. 25 New CEQA VMT Transportation Thresholds Page 2 of 6 appropriate guidance for projects subject to environmental review. The guidance is to ensure that all projects subject to review by that agency use the same data, approaches, and analytical tools. A study was conducted by SGVCO G to assist its member agencies in understanding the specific questions that need to be addressed when making these determinations and to provide research, analysis, and other evidence to support their final SB 743 implementation decisions. The goal of the study was to develop criteria to help jurisdictions develop a record. The recommendations provided here by staff have been adjusted to better suit the City’s needs. SB 743 must be implemented by lead agencies by July 1, 2020. Since SB 743 represents a significant departure from the City’s current practice, the City must address the following questions below prior to taking any action: 1. Methodology – What methodology should be used to forecast project-generated VMT and a project’s effect on VMT under baseline and cumulative conditions, and how does the selection of a threshold influence the methodology decision? 2. Thresholds – What threshold options are available to each jurisdiction and what substantial evidence exists to support selecting a specific VMT threshold? 3. Mitigation – What would constitute feasible mitigation measures for a VMT impact given the land use and transportation context of the SGVCOG region? The methodology, VMT thresholds and mitigation criteria to be utilized must be adopted by each jurisdiction. Potential VMT thresholds were assessed within the context of the objectives of SB 743, legal opinions related to the legislation, proposed CEQA Guidelines Updates, and the Technical Advisory produced by the Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR). The thresholds that the OPR’s Technical Advisory Committee recommended is that proposed developments should generate VMT per person that is no less than 15% below existing VMT per capita. In addition, the OPR identified projects and types of projects that should be “screened” from a VMT analysis, meaning they would be automatically found to have no significant traffic impact. ANALYSIS: CEQA Transportation Thresholds Which projects should be exempt from VMT Analysis? Project Screening Criteria: As noted above, the OPR has identified guidelines for projects which may be screened and would therefore be exempt from a VMT analysis. The theory is that the development of these projects will by their nature reduce vehicle trips and therefore be in conformance with SB 743. In accordance with OPR 6.2 Packet Pg. 26 New CEQA VMT Transportation Thresholds Page 3 of 6 guidelines, staff recommends that the City screen out projects that fall within the following categories: • Retail projects up to 50,000 SF in floor area. • Projects generating less than 110 daily trips. • Residential and office projects located in low VMT areas. Low VMT is defined as 15% below the City baseline average VMT for that area. • Projects within a Transit Priority Area (TPA). A TPA is defined as locations within ½ mile of a major transit stop or station (e.g. Metrolink), or within ½ mile of a high-quality transit corridor with headways of 15-minutes or less during peak commute hours. • Affordable housing developments or affordable housing units within mixed -use developments. • Transportation projects that promote non-auto travel, improve safety, or improve traffic operations at current bottlenecks, such as transit, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, intersection traffic control (e.g., traffic signals or roundabouts), or widening at intersections to provide new turn lanes. How does the City define its Baseline VMT? Baseline VMT Methodology and Data: The Baseline VMT is defined as the average VMT for the area represented by the City of Diamond Bar, as measured by VMT per capita, VMT per employee, or VMT per service population. A project’s VMT will be compared to the Baseline VMT when determining potential significant impacts. Baseline total VMT per service population (i.e., population plus employment), home - based VMT per capita, and home-based work VMT per worker were calculated using outputs from the Southern California Association of Governments’ (SCAG) Regional Transportation Plan travel forecasting model and the SCAG Transportation Analysis Model. In addition, data from the California Household Travel Survey was used to compare model derived estimates of home-based VMT with those based on survey observations. VMT results and comparisons of results from different data sources were displayed graphically to aid in determining the appropriate VMT me tric and data source for calculating VMT throughout the SGVCOG region. Based on the different options analyzed, staff recommends the utilization of the Citywide boundary VMT per service population for impacts on project generated VMT and project effect on VMT. The baseline VMTs for each type of project are presented in Table 1 (see Attachment 2). It is recommended that the latest version of the SCAG Model be used to determine Diamond Bar’s baseline average VMT. 6.2 Packet Pg. 27 New CEQA VMT Transportation Thresholds Page 4 of 6 What is an appropriate VMT significant impact threshold? Threshold Options: Potential VMT thresholds were assessed within the context of the objectives of SB 743, legal opinions related to the legislation, proposed CEQA Guidelines updates, and the Technical Advisory produced by OPR. The results of the study being conducted by SGVCOG, identified four threshold options for consideration by lead agencies. • Option 1: Thresholds consistent with OPR’s Technical Advisory, recommending that proposed developments generate VMT that is 15% below existing VMT; • Option 2: Thresholds consistent with Lead Agency air quality, greenhouse gas emissions reduction, and energy conservation goals (14.3% below existing); • Option 3: Thresholds consistent with the Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy future year VMT projects by jurisdiction or subregion (better than General Plan Buildout); and • Option 4: Thresholds based on baseline VMT performance by jurisdiction or subregion (better than existing). Based on the research conducted by SGVCOG, a re view of potential projects, internal staff discussions, and a desire to maintain thresholds which are in keeping with the recommendations of the Governor’s OPR, it is staff’s recommendation that the City choose Option 1, utilizing a threshold consistent with 15% below the City of Diamond Bar’s average VMT for land development projects. This is more clearly defined in Table 1, as are the thresholds for other types of projects. Mitigation: Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies and its effectiven ess for reducing VMT are currently being reviewed and assessed for relevancy by SGVCOG. Key strategies which have been examined and could prove effective include: • Diversifying land use; • Improving pedestrian networks; • Implementing traffic calming infrastructure; • Building low-street bicycle network improvements; • Encouraging telecommuting and alternative work schedules; and • Providing ride-share programs Due to limitations of project-by-project approaches to reducing VMT, an evaluation of larger mitigation programs is being examined by SGVCOG. New program concepts 6.2 Packet Pg. 28 New CEQA VMT Transportation Thresholds Page 5 of 6 could include VMT mitigation banks and exchanges. These are innovative concepts that have not yet been developed and tested but are being considered in areas where limited mitigation options would otherwise exist. SGVCOG is looking into the feasibility of a VMT mitigation bank or exchange in order to further assist lead agencies in implementing SB 743. At this point, staff does not recommend that the City commit to adopting specific mitigation measures, but would recommend acceptance of mitigation measures that have been analyzed by SGVCOG and proven to be effective. In addition to CEQA analysis, the City will be requiring a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) to be consistent with the General Plan goals and policies that set standards for which City infrastructure will strive to maintain. Therefore, a TIA will evaluate intersection and roadway LOS impacts as part of the City’s TIA Guidelines. General Plan Consistency The new CEQA VMT transportation impact thresholds are consistent with the objectives, principles, and standards of the General Plan. The Land Use & Economic Development, Community Character & Placemaking, Circulation, Resource Conservation, and Community Health & Sustainability Elements have a numerous goals and policies relevant to the new CEQA transportation impact thresholds, including the following: GENERAL PLAN ELEMENT GOALS & POLICIES Land Use & Economic Development LU-G-4, LU-P-3, LU-P-4, LU-P-7, LU-G-9, LU-P-14, LU-G-12, LU-G-13, LU-G-14, LU-G- 19, LU-G-26, LU-P-15, LU-P-21, LU-P-26, LU- P-28, LU-P-29, LU-P-31, LU-P-32, LU-P-33, LU-P-35, LU-P-41, LU-P-45, LU-P-49, LU-P- 51, ED-G-2, ED-G-5, ED-P-8, ED-P-9 Community Character & Placemaking CC-P-23, CC-P-25, CC-P-26, CC-G-14, CC-P- 56, CC-P-58, CC-P-59, CC-G-17, CC-P-64 Circulation CR-G-1, CR-G-2, CR-G-3, CR-G-4, CR-G-5, CR-G-6, CR-P-3, CR-P-4, CR-P-5, CR-P-7, CR-G-8, CR-P-12, CR-P-16, CR-P-24, CR-P- 25, CR-P-54 Resource Conservation RC-G-14, RC-P-35 Community Health & Sustainability CHS-G-2, CHS-P-4, CHS-P-5, CHS-P-6, CHS-P-33 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The new CEQA VMT transportation thresholds have been assessed in accordance with the authority and criteria contained in CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. The 6.2 Packet Pg. 29 New CEQA VMT Transportation Thresholds Page 6 of 6 adoption of new local CEQA thresholds of significance for transportation impacts and the adoption of new Local Transportation Assessment Guidelines will not have a significant environmental impact and are exempt from the CEQA pursuant to Section 15308 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations because the two actions are undertaken by the City for the protection of the environment. The revised CEQA thresholds will be compliant with a State mandate (SB 743) and will be used in a regulatory process (CEQA process) that involves procedures for the protection of the environment. Accordingly, the City Council will consider the recommendation to find the Resolution exempt from the environmental review requirements of CEQA pursuant to Section 15308 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. PREPARED BY: REVIEWED BY: Attachments: A. Draft Resolution No. 2020-XX B. Table 1: Significant Thresholds for Transportation 6.2 Packet Pg. 30 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2020-XX A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THE ADOPTION OF “VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED” THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE FOR PURPOSES OF ANALYZING TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT TO THE CITY COUNCIL. A. RECITALS 1. WHEREAS, on April 18, 1989, the City of Diamond Bar was established as a duly organized municipal corporation of the State of California. 2. WHEREAS, on July 25, 1995, the City of Diamond Bar adopted its General Plan incorporating all State mandated elements, and portions of the General Plan have been updated from time to time. 3. WHEREAS, on December 17, 2019, the City of Diamond Bar adopted its comprehensive update of the General Plan (“General Plan 2040”). 4. WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (“CEQA Guidelines”) encourage public agencies to develop and pub lish generally applicable “thresholds of significance” to be used in determining the significance of a project’s environmental effects. 5. WHEREAS, CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.7(a) defines a threshold of significance as “an identifiable quantitative, qualitative or performance level of a particular environmental effect, noncompliance with which means the effect will normally be determined to be significant by the agency and compliance with which means the effect normally will be determined to be less than significant”. 6. WHEREAS, CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.7(b) requires that thresholds of significance must be adopted by ordinance, resolution, rule, or regulations, developed through a public review process, and be supported by substantial evidence. 7. WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.7(c), when adopting thresholds of significance, a public agency may consider thresholds of significance adopted or recommended by other public agencies provided that the decision of the agency is supported by substantial evidence. 8. WHEREAS, Senate Bill 743, enacted in 2013 and codified in Public Resources Code Section 21099, required changes to the CEQA Guidelines regarding the criteria for determining the significance of transportation impacts of projects. 9. WHEREAS, in 2018, the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (“OPR”) proposed, and the California Natural Resources Agency certified and adopted, new CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3 that identifies vehicle miles traveled (“VMT”) – meaning the amount and distance of automobile travel attributable to a project – as the most appropriate metric to evaluate a project’s transportation impacts. 6.2.a Packet Pg. 31 2 PC Resolution No. 2020-XX 10. WHEREAS, as a result, automobile delay, as measured by “level of service” and other similar metrics, generally no longer constitutes a significant environmental effect under CEQA. 11. WHEREAS, CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3 goes into effect on July 1, 2020, though public agencies may elect to be governed by this section immediately. 12. WHEREAS, the City of Diamond Bar, following a public review process consisting of staff presentations before the Planning Commission, wishes to recommend adopting the VMT thresholds of significance for determining the significance of transportation impacts to the City Council. 13. WHEREAS, on May 26, 2020, at a regularly scheduled meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed and considered the City of Diamond Bar’s proposed VMT thresholds of significance for determining the significance of transportation impacts and recommends adoption to the City Council. B. RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: 1. This Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the facts and evidence presented during the Planning Commission meeting regarding the City’s proposed VMT thresholds of significance for determining the significance of transportation impacts , including oral and documentary evidence provided by City staff, the Planning Commission hereby finds as follows: (a) The new CEQA VMT transportation impact thresholds are consistent with the City’s General Plan 2040’s numerous goals and policies adopted December 17, 2019, including, but not limited to, the following: (i) Land Use & Economic Development Element • Goals: LU-G-4, LU-G-9, LU-G-12, LU-G-13, LU-G-14, LU-G-19, LU-G-26, ED-G-2, ED-G-5 • Policies: LU-P-3, LU-P-4, LU-P-7, LU-P-14, LU-P-15, LU-P-21, LU-P-26, LU-P-28, LU-P-29, LU-P-31, LU-P-32, LU-P-33, LU-P- 35, LU-P-41, LU-P-45, LU-P-49, LU-P-51, ED-P-9, ED-P-9 (ii) Community Character & Placemaking Element • Goals: CC-G-14, CC-G-17 • Policies: CC-P-23, CC-P-25, CC-P-26, CC-P-56, CC-P-58, CC- P-59, CC-P-64 6.2.a Packet Pg. 32 3 PC Resolution No. 2020-XX (iii) Circulation Element • Goals: CR-G-1, CR-G-2, CR-G-3, CR-G-4, CR-G-5, CR-G-6, CR-G-8 • Policies: CR-P-3, CR-P-4, CR-P-5, CR-P-7, CR-P-12, CR-P-16, CR-P-24, CR-P-25, CR-P- 54 (iv) Resource Conservation Element • Goal: RC-G-14 • Policy: RC-P-35 (v) Community Health & Sustainability Element • Goal: CHS-G-2 • Policies: CHS-P-4, CHS-P-5, CHS-P-6, CHS-P-33 (b) The new CEQA VMT transportation thresholds has been assessed in accordance with the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the State CEQA Guidelines. The adoption of new local CEQA thresholds of significance for transportation impacts and the adoption of new Local Transportation Assessment Guidelines will not have a significant environmental impact and are exempt from the CEQA pursuant to Section 15308 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations because the two actions are undertaken by the City for the protection of the environment. The revised CEQA thresholds will be compliant with a State mandate (SB 743) and will be used in a regulatory process (CEQA process) that involves procedures for the protection of the environment. Accordingly, the City Council will consider the recommendation to find the Resolution exempt from the environmental review requirements of CEQA pursuant to Section 15308 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 3. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth above, this Resolution shall serve as the Planning Commission’s report to the City Council recommending adoption of the VMT thresholds of significance as set forth in Exhibit A. The Planning Commission shall: (a) Certify as to the adoption of this Resolution; and (b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution to the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar. 6.2.a Packet Pg. 33 4 PC Resolution No. 2020-XX ADOPTED AND APPROVED THIS 26th DAY OF MAY, 2020, BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. ______________________________ Kenneth Mok, Chairman I, Greg Gubman, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of May, 2020, by the following vote to wit: AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: ABSTAIN: Commissioners: ATTEST: ______________________________ Greg Gubman, Secretary 6.2.a Packet Pg. 34 City of Diamond Bar VMT Baselines and Thresholds of Significance Consistent with State CEQA guidelines section 15064.3, the City of Diamond Bar has adopted the project baselines and thresholds of significance set forth in Table 1 to guide in determining when a project will have a significant transportation impact. Table 1 Project Type Baseline and Methodology Threshold Land Use Plan Total VMT per service population. Origin/Destination (OD) A significant impact would occur if the VMT1 for the plan would exceed the current baseline VMT2. Land Use Project (mixed-use with residential and employment components and special generators) Origin/Destination (OD) per resident/employee. Determination of applicable projects will be determined by City staff on a case- by-case basis. A significant impact would occur if the VMT1 for the project would exceed 15% below the applicable baseline VMT2. Land Use Project (residential only) Origin/Destination (OD) per resident/employee, and Home- Base VMT per population using Production/Attraction (PA) A significant impact would occur if the VMT1 for the project would exceed 15% below the applicable baseline VMT2. Land Use Project (employment generators) Origin/Destination (OD) per resident/employee, and Home- Base-Work VMT per Employee using Production/Attraction (PA) A significant impact would occur if the VMT1 for the project would exceed 15% below the applicable baseline VMT2. Retail Project Home-Base to Work VMT per Employee Production/Attraction (PA). Alternatively, the boundary method could be applied to determine if the project results in a net increases or a net decrease in VMT in the selected boundary (typically within the City limits). A significant impact would occur if the VMT1 for the project would exceed 15% below the applicable baseline VMT2. If boundary method is applied, impact would occur if a net increase in Total VMT occurs. 6.2.b Packet Pg. 35 Transportation Project Total VMT per service population using the boundary method to determine if the project results in a net increase or a net decrease in VMT in the selected boundary (typically within the City limits). A significant impact would occur in there is a net increase in total VMT within the boundary. Note: 1. VMT to be reported as VMT per baseline indicated for that project type. 2. Baseline VMT is defined as the City of Diamond Bar VMT. 6.2.b Packet Pg. 36 Project Status Report CITY OF DIAMOND BAR May 26, 2020 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT LEGEND PH = PUBLIC HEARING X = NON PUBLIC HEARING AP = ASSIGNED PLANNER PC = PLANNING COMMISSION AR = ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW CC = CITY COUNCIL PROPERTY LOCATION PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW File # AP Applicant PC 5/26/20 CC 6/2/20 PC 6/9/20 CC 6/16/20 PC 6/23/20 CC 7/7/20 New CEQA VMT Transportation Thresholds GL X FY2020-2021 CIP GL Citywide X 1111 N. Diamond Bar Blvd. (New Single family residence) ZC/DR PL2015-253 GL Creative Design Associates PH ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW Property Location AP Applicant None PENDING ITEMS Property Location File # AP Applicant Status 2523 Blaze Trail (New single family residence) DR PL2020-49 MN Pete Volbeda Incomplete letter sent 4/17/20 - waiting for additional information 2366 Clear Creek (Addition to single family residence) DR PL2020-70 NTE Pete Volbeda Under review Crooked Creek (11-unit subdivision) TTM, DR, CUP, TP PL2017-203 MN Rob Meserve Incomplete letter sent 1/10/20 – waiting for additional information 800 N. Diamond Bar Blvd. (Sign program) CSP PL2019-164 MN Raj Panchal Second incomplete letter sent 3/9/20 – waiting for additional information 24011 Falcons View Dr. (Addition and remodel to single family residence) DR PL2020-25 MN William Edwards Under Review 20657 Golden Springs (Sign program amendment) CUP PL2019-172 MN Sign Express Incomplete letter sent 10/10/19 – waiting for additional Information 2360 Indian Creek (Addition and remodel to single family residence) DR PL2019-185 MN Pete Volbeda Second incomplete letter sent 2/26/20 – waiting for additional information 22589 Pacific Ln. (New single family residence) DR PL2020-17 NTE Jason Baumgartner Under Review 9.1 Packet Pg. 37 Project Status Report CITY OF DIAMOND BAR Page 2 May 26, 2020 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PENDING ITEMS (continued) Property Location File # AP Applicant Status 22938 ½ Ridge Line Rd. (Wireless facility) CUP PL2020-42 NTE Jill Cleveland Incomplete letter sent 3/30/20 – waiting for additional information 23121 Ridge Line Rd. (New single family residence) DR PL2020-31 NTE Pete Volbeda Incomplete letter sent 3/26/20 – waiting for additional information 23135 Ridge Line Rd. (New single family residence) DR PL2018-233 MN Faiz Ennabe Second incomplete letter sent 2/6/20 – waiting for additional information 2775 Shadow Canyon (New single family residence) DR PL2019-188 NTE Edwin Agabao Incomplete letter sent 3/10/20 - waiting for additional information 9.1 Packet Pg. 38 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING AND AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF DIAMOND BAR I, Stella Marquez, declare as follows: I am employed by the City of Diamond Bar, Community Development Department. On May 22, 2020, a copy of the May 26, 2020, Planning Commission Agenda, was posted at the following locations: SCAOMD/Government Center, 21865 Copley Drive Heritage Park, 2900 Brea Canyon Road City website: www.diamondbarca.gov Due to COVID-19 closures, the Planning Commission Agenda could not be posted at the following regular posting locations: Diamond Bar City Hall Diamond Bar Library I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on May 22, 2020, at Diamond Bar, California. Community Deve