Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021.02.16 Agenda Packet - Regular Meeting City Council Agenda Tuesday, February 16, 2021 6:30 PM PUBLIC ADVISORY: Consistent with the Governor’s latest Executive Order to Stay at Home, avoid gatherings and maintain social distancing, the regular meeting portion of the agenda will be conducted telephonically and Members of the City Council and staff will be participating via Teleconference. There will be no physical meeting location for the regular meeting. How to Observe the Meeting: To maximize public safety while still maintaining transparency and public access, members of the public can observe the meeting by calling +1 (415) 655-0060, Attendee Access Code: 299- 995-137 or by visiting https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/3884767408394563344. How to Submit Public Comment: Members of the public may provide public comment by sending written comments to the City Clerk by email at cityclerk@DiamondBarCA.gov by 5:30 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Please indicate in the Subject Line “FOR PUBLIC COMMENT.” Written comments will be distributed to the Council Members and read into the record at the meeting, up to a maximum of five minutes. Alternatively, public comment may be submitted by logging onto the meeting through this link: https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/3884767408394563344. Members of the public will be called upon one at a time during the Public Comment portion of the agenda, and will be asked to state their name and agenda item they wish to comment on. Speakers are limited to five minutes per agenda item, unless the Mayor determines otherwise. American Disability Act Accommodations: Pursuant to the Executive Order, and in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in the Council Meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office (909) 839-7010 within 72 hours of the meeting. City Council video recordings with transcription will be available upon request the day following the Council Meeting. The City of Diamond Bar thanks you in advance for taking all precautions to prevent spreading the COVID-19 virus. ANDREW CHOU Council Member STAN LIU Council Member STEVE TYE Council Member NANCY A. LYONS Mayor RUTH M. LOW Mayor Pro Tem City Manager Dan Fox • City Attorney David DeBerry • City Clerk Kristina Santana DIAMOND BAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING RULES Welcome to the meeting of the Diamond Bar City Council. Meetings are open to the public and are broadcast on Spectrum Cable Channel 3 and Frontier FiOS television Channel 47. You are invited to attend and participate. Copies of staff reports or other written documentation relating to agenda items are on file and available for public inspection by contacting the Office of the City Clerk. If requested, the agenda will be made available in an alternative format to a person with disability as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. If you have questions regarding an agenda item, please contact the City Clerk at (909) 839-7010 during regular business hours. PUBLIC INPUT Members of the public may address the Council on any item of business on the agenda during the time the item is taken up by the Council. In addition, members of the public may, during the Public Comment period address the Council on any Consent Calendar item or any matter not on the agenda and within the Council’s subject matter jurisdiction. Any material to be submitted to the City Council at the meeting should be submitted through the City Clerk. Speakers are limited to five minutes per agenda item, unless the Mayor determines otherwise. The Mayor may adjust this time limit depending on the number of people wishing to speak, the complexity of the matter, the length of the agenda, the hour and any other relevant consideration. Speakers may address the Council only once on an agenda item, except during public hearings, when the applicant/appellant may be afforded a rebuttal. Public comments must be directed to the City Council. Behavior that disrupts the orderly conduct of the meeting may result in the speaker being removed from the meeting. INFORMATION RELATING TO AGENDAS AND ACTIONS OF THE COUNCIL Agendas for regular City Council meetings are available 72 hours prior to the meeting and are posted in the City’s regular posting locations, on DBTV Channel 3, Spectrum Cable Channel 3, Frontier FiOS television Channel 47 and on the City’s website at www.diamondbarca.gov. The City Council may take action on any item listed on the agenda. HELPFUL PHONE NUMBERS Copies of agendas, rules of the Council, Video of meetings: (909) 839-7010 Computer access to agendas: www.diamondbarca.gov General information: (909) 839-7000 Written materials distributed to the City Council within 72 hours of the City Council meeting are available for public inspection immediately upon distribution in the City Clerk’s Office at 21810 Copley Dr., Diamond Bar, California, during normal business hours. THIS MEETING IS BEING VIDEO RECORDED AND BY PARTICIPATING VIA TELECONFERENCE, YOU ARE GIVING YOUR PERMISSION TO BE TELEVISED. THIS MEETING WILL BE RE-BROADCAST EVERY SATURDAY AND SUNDAY AT 9:00 A.M. AND ALTERNATE TUESDAYS AT 8:00 P.M. AND IS ALSO AVAILABLE FOR LIVE VIEWING AT HTTPS://ATTENDEE.GOTOWEBINAR.COM/REGISTER/3884767408394563344 AND ARCHIVED VIEWING ON THE CITY’S WEB SITE AT WWW.DIAMONDBARCA.GOV. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA February 16, 2021 CALL TO ORDER: 6:30 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor ROLL CALL: Chou, Liu, Tye, Mayor Pro Tem Low, Mayor Lyons APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Mayor 1. CITY MANAGER REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS: "Public Comments" is the time reserved on each regular meeting agenda to provide an opportunity for members of the public to directly address the Council on Consent Calendar items or other matters of interest not on the agenda that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Council. Although the City Council values your comments, pursuant to the Brown Act, members of the City Council or Staff may briefly respond to public comments if necessary, but no extended discussion and no action on such matters may take place. There is a five-minute maximum time limit when addressing the City Council. At this time, the teleconference moderator will ask callers one at a time to give their name and if there is an agenda item number they wish to sp eak on before providing their comment. If you wish to speak on a public hearing item or council consideration item, you will then be called upon to speak at that point in the agenda. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR: All items listed on the Consent Calendar are considered by the City Council to be routine and will be acted on by a single motion unless a Council Member or FEBRUARY 16, 2021 PAGE 2 member of the public request otherwise, in which case, the item will be removed for separate consideration. 3.1 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OF THE FEBRUARY 2, 2021 STUDY SESSION AND REGULAR MEETING. 3.1.a February 2, 2021 Study Session Minutes 3.1.b February 2, 2021 Regular Meeting Minutes Recommended Action: Approve the February 2, 2021 Study Session and Regular City Council meeting minutes. Requested by: City Clerk 3.2 RATIFICATION OF CHECK REGISTER DATED JANUARY 28, 2021 THROUGH FEBRUARY 10, 2021 TOTALING $396,885.74. Recommended Action: Ratify the Check Register. Requested by: Finance Department 3.3 TREASURER'S STATEMENT Recommended Action: Approve the August 2020 and the Revised July 2020 Treasurer's Statements. Requested by: Finance Department 3.4 BLACK HISTORY MONTH PROCLAMATION. Recommended Action: Adopt the Proclamation declaring February as Black History Month. Requested by: City Manager 3.5 EXONERATION OF SURETY BOND NO. 929638539 TO INSTALL MONUMENTATION FOR TRACT MAP 63623 (SOUTH POINTE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) Recommended Action: Approve the exoneration of Surety Bond No. 929638539. Requested by: Public Works Department 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS: NONE. FEBRUARY 16, 2021 PAGE 3 5. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: 5.1 DIAMOND BAR HOMELESSNESS RESPONSE PLAN. Recommended Action: That the City Council adopt the Diamond Bar Homelessness Response Plan. Requested by: City Manager 5.2 DISSOLUTION OF LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 41. Recommended Action: Direct staff to take necessary steps to dissolve Landscaping Assessment District No. 41. Requested by: Public Works Department 5.3 DISSOLUTION OF LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 39. Recommended Action: Direct staff to take the necessary steps to dissolve Landscaping Assessment District No. 39. Requested by: Public Works Department 5.4 FISCAL YEAR 2020/2021 MID-YEAR BUDGET REVIEW. Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 2021-05 amending the Fiscal Year 2020/2021 Municipal Budget revenue estimates and appropriations. Requested by: Finance Department 6. COUNCIL SUB-COMMITTEE REPORTS AND MEETING ATTENDANCE REPORTS/COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS: 7. ADJOURNMENT: Agenda #: 3.1 Meeting Date: February 16, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Daniel Fox, City Manager TITLE: CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OF THE FEBRUARY 2, 2021 STUDY SESSION AND REGULAR MEETING. STRATEGIC GOAL: Open, Engaged & Responsive Government RECOMMENDATION: Approve the February 2, 2021 Study Session and Regular City Council meeting minutes. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Minutes have been prepared and are being presented for approval. PREPARED BY: 3.1 Packet Pg. 6 REVIEWED BY: Attachments: 1. 3.1.a February 2, 2021 Study Session Minutes 2. 3.1.b February 2, 2021 Regular Meeting Minutes 3.1 Packet Pg. 7 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION FEBRUARY 2, 2021 STUDY SESSION: M/Lyons called the Study Session to order at 5:30 p.m. Mayor Lyons announced that consistent with COVID-19 regulations, all Council Members and staff participated via teleconference and there was no physical location for public attendance. The Public was invited to join the meeting online or by phone at the numbers printed on the agenda. ROLL CALL: Council Members Andrew Chou, Stan Liu, Steve Tye Mayor Pro Tem Ruth Low, Mayor Nancy Lyons Staff participating telephonically: Dan Fox, City Manager; Dave DeBerry, City Attorney; Ryan McLean, Assistant City Manager; Anthony Santos, Assistant to the City Manager; Alfa Lopez, Senior Management Analyst; Ryan Wright, Parks and Recreation Director; Christy Murphey, Recreation Superintendent; David Liu, Public Works Director; Dianna Honeywell, Director of Finance; Ken Desforges, Director of Information Services; Marsha Roa, Public Information Manager; Cecilia Arellano, Public Information Coordinator; Kristina Santana, City Clerk Public Comments: Daniel Kennedy disagreed with C/Chou’s premise that third-party delivery services are causing local restaurants to lose money and need to have their commission fees capped and to him, to propose such a solution is unwarranted during a pandemic when delivery service owners, drivers and customers are depending on providing this essential service for their livelihood. ► CONSIDERATION OF TEMPORARY CAP ON COMMISSION FEES CHARGED BY THIRD-PARTY DELIVERY SERVICES SMA/Lopez provided a presentation and reported that LA County Board of Supervisors passed an ordinance in July that placed a cap of 20 percent inclusive of all fees charged to restaurants and made it unlawful for companies to reduce compensation by any tip and/or gratuities paid to workers by customers. Should the City Council wish to proceed with an ordinance it is requested that the City Council provide direction to staff to prepare an ordinance for consideration at the February 16th Council Meeting based on the LA County Ordinance or, take no further action on this matter at this time. C/Tye asked who pays the menu fee and SMA/Lopez responded that the restaurant pays the menu fee. This fee represents the actual charge for food that it is ordered by the customer, but it can be marked up in combination with the delivery (commission/processing) fee by the service provider to achieve a pre-determined overall charge. 3.1.a Packet Pg. 8 FEBRUARY 2, 2021 PAGE 2 CC STUDY SESSION MPT/Low asked for an explanation for the terms “commission fee”, “pickup/takeout fee”, “marketing fee”, and “delivery fee”. SMA/Lopez responded that the commission fee is the fee charged to the providing restaurant for use of the application (app) and typically includes the credit card processing fee ; the pickup/takeout fee is the commission paid by the restaurant to the service provider for any takeout or pickup orders placed via the mobile app ; the marketing fee is an optional add-on fee to increase the restaurant’s visibility within the search listings on mobile app; and the delivery fee is the difference between pickup and delivery fee if someone uses the app to place the order versus calling the restaurant directly for which the delivery service company would pick up a commission. MPT/Low asked for clarification on fees paid for by restaurant versus fees paid for by customers. SMA/Lopez explained that the fees paid by restaurant are agreed upon fees set by an agreement signed by the restaurant, and the fees paid by customers includes fees charged by the delivery service directly to the customer. C/Tye asked if the delivery service is making delivery fees on both sides (restaurant and customer). SMA/Lopez said C/Tye was correct and that it is called a three-way model approach where the customer and the restaurant and the driver are all committing to the model. C/Chou explained that his request to have this item considered by the Council came up in discussions with local restaurant owners. One owner said that when he uses these delivery services, he loses money on every single delivery. Most restaurant owners agree with some kind of fee because they understand this is a service they are using which helps them get their name out and get more food out of the door. What they object to is the 30-40 percent commission which eats into their profit and affects their bottom line. M/Lyons said that while she understands what C/Chou is saying, it is the right of individuals to use or not use restaurant services. There are at least four different delivery services operating in Diamond Bar and she would suspect there is competition among these services. She asked if fees are the s ame or different for each of the companies and SMA/Lopez said she has found that the agreements established between restaurants and delivery service companies are confidential in nature. The survey was anonymous so that more restaurants would feel free to disclose their fees which are negotiated and could be different, depending on the restaurant. C/Liu felt that because of the restrictions imposed on restaurants and residents during the pandemic, they are unable to operate as they normally would and at this point it appears that there is more urgency on restaurants to use these services in order to continue to maintain their businesses. SMA/Lopez said that revenues have tripled and quadrupled those of last year due to the demand of the stay-at-home orders. As an example, restaurants will have a menu for $10 and pay $3 in order to net a $7 profit and that same item, under this program, 3.1.a Packet Pg. 9 FEBRUARY 2, 2021 PAGE 3 CC STUDY SESSION will be sold to the customer for $18 or $19 with the restaurant keeping the same $7 profit. In fact, the demand for these services seems to have increased due to people staying at home. M/Lyons felt it was inappropriate for the City to regulate fees in this instance. C/Tye said that in his discussion with restaurant owners, he learned that as the pandemic has extended months and months, they have raised their prices to accommodate the increased fees and he does not see that limiting fees would change that circumstance. He does not agree with C/Chou or C/Liu because to him, this is a free-market issue. When restaurants committed to outdoor dining, they spent a great deal of money in the purchase of tables, heaters and plexi - glass which was a decision made by the owners. Shortly after it was okay to accommodate outdoor dining, the stay-at-home order was issued. And these are business-decisions. One of the restaurant owners told him that probably 15 percent of his business was via delivery and that it was mostly millennials who were taking advantage of the delivery service. C/Tye said that if he wants to have restaurant food he picks it up. It is a personal decision whether people wish to avail themselves of delivery service and whether restaurants offer the delivery service. When there was no pandemic, fees were okay and now with a pandemic fees are not okay. He does not understand that premise, and believes it is government getting in the way of free enterprise. C/Chou said that he appreciates everyone’s comments on this recommendation which was something he felt would help local restaurants. M/Lyons pointed out that the City has done a great deal to help restaurants and the Council continues to research all possibilities but does not believe this particular step is necessary. MPT/Low agreed that the City has done a lot for restaurants including encouraging residents to do what they can to support them. She does not like the idea of using the pandemic to impose caps on free enterprise or any kind of restrictions that have not been fully vetted. The idea of interfering with the contract between the restaurant and delivery service providers does not sit well with her, especially, when as staff has pointed out, it involves advertising for the restaurant. In addition, by trying to help restaurants in this manner we may be depriving drivers of their livelihood, some of whom are residents who have become unemployed from their regular jobs and are doing what they can to feed their families making them subject to rising gas prices, etc. Following discussion, C/Chou moved, C/Liu seconded, to direct staff to prepare and ordinance based on the LA County Ordinance. Motion failed by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Chou, Liu, NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Tye, MPT/Low, M/Lyons ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None 3.1.a Packet Pg. 10 FEBRUARY 2, 2021 PAGE 4 CC STUDY SESSION ADJOURNMENT: With no further business to come before the City Council, M/Lyons recessed the Study Session at 6:17 p.m. to the Regular Meeting. Respectfully submitted: __________________________ Kristina Santana, City Clerk The foregoing minutes are hereby approved this 16th day of February, 2021. __________________________ Nancy Lyons, Mayor 3.1.a Packet Pg. 11 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 2, 2021 CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Lyons called the Regular City Council meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. Mayor Lyons announced that consistent with COVID-19 regulations, all Council Members and staff participated via teleconference and there was no physical location for public attendance. The Public was invited to join the meeting online or by phone at the numbers printed on the agenda. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Lyons led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: Council Members Andrew Chou, Stan Liu, Steve Tye, Mayor Pro Tem Ruth Low, Mayor Nancy Lyons Staff participating telephonically: Dan Fox, City Manager; Dave DeBerry, City Attorney; Ryan McLean, Assistant City Manager; Anthony Santos, Assistant to the City Manager; Alfa Lopez, Senior Management Analyst; Ryan Wright, Parks and Recreation Director; Christy Murphey, Recreation Superintendent; David Liu, Public Works Director; Dianna Honeywell, Director of Finance; Ken Desforges, Dir ector of Information Services; Marsha Roa, Public Information Manager; Cecilia Arellano, Public Information Coordinator; Kristina Santana, City Clerk APPROVAL OF AGENDA: As submitted. 1. CITY MANAGER REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: None 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS: CC/Santana read the following public comments submitted via email: Jonathan Hawes asked for Council’s support to call out what he believed were financial crimes committed against the residents of El Monte. Public comments offered telephonically: None offered. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR: MPT/Low moved, C/Liu seconded, to approve the Consent Calendar as presented. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Chou, Liu, Tye, MPT/Low, M/Lyons NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None 3.1 APPROVED UPDATED CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: 3.1.b Packet Pg. 12 FEBRUARY 2, 2021 PAGE 2 CITY COUNCIL 3.1a JANUARY 19, 2021 REGULAR MEETING. Updated minutes were disseminated to the City Council based on Mayor Lyon’s request for more detail on Item 3.4. 3.2 CITY COUNCIL RECEIPT AND FILING OF COMMISSION MINUTES: 3.2a PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF DECEMBER 8, 2020. 3.3 RATIFIED CHECK REGISTER DATED JANUARY 14, 2021 THROUGH JANUARY 27, 2021 TOTALING $1,503,147.72. 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None 5. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: 5.1 PRESENTATION OF DIGITAL BILLBOARD PROPOSAL BY WALNUT VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT. CM/Fox introduced this item and recommendation for the City Council to receive a presentation by the Walnut Valley Unified School District and offer comments and questions to help the district gauge the feasibility to move forward with an application to amend the City’s Sign Code. Presentation provided by Superintendent Dr. Robert Taylor, WVUSD Board Members Cindy Ruiz and Larry Redinger, and Assistant Superintendent Dr. Matthew Torres. M/Lyons opened Public Comments. Paul Diebel spoke against the proposed project as a bad idea to consider amending the code to allow Diamond Bar to become a billboard corridor along the SR60 because it would be an eyesore and potential traffic safety hazard. Robin Smith agreed that a billboard would not be an aesthetic asset to the City and when animated, it would create a potential traffic hazard. M/Lyons closed Public Comments. MPT/Low asked the total budget and amount of deficit for the district. Dr. Taylor responded that the school district does not have a structural or spending deficit, rather there is a difference in the funding between surrounding school districts and the WVUSD as the structure for schools in California is heavily influenced by demographics. The subgroup of student demographic makeup for WVUSD does not equate to higher levels of funding which amounts to an estimated deficit of $20-30 million 3.1.b Packet Pg. 13 FEBRUARY 2, 2021 PAGE 3 CITY COUNCIL per year. C/Tye asked for an explanation of a revenue spread of $150,000 to $300,000. Dr. Torres responded that there is no way to determine the exact amount of potential revenue because it will depend on appeal from offsite businesses that may want to participate in advertising via the billboard and may fluctuate depending on the economy and businesses, thus the conservative estimate and spread. Cindy Ruiz added that it is difficult to project revenue sharing because of the need to follow the district’s requirements for allowed age-appropriate advertising. C/Chou asked if the revenue from the proposed billboard would go toward the district’s general fund or if it would be specifically earmarked. Dr. Torres responded that the district does not want to get ahead of itself by specifying programs. WVUSD is a financially stable district that operates within its means and this would augment different programs such as access courses, special education programs, emotional and academic needs, and learning loss due to the pandemic. C/Chou asked CA/DeBerry to comment on concerns regarding potential implications of the City changing its sign code. CA/DeBerry explained that sign ordinances are tricky and any sign code amendments must be carefully crafted. One question will be that if the City amends its sign code to allow billboards, to what extent will that allow billboards to be placed throughout the City and whether it can be amended to one, two or three locations, potentially. While the City can treat similarly situated properties differently to a certain extent, it may be that given the location of the school district’s billboard, it may be the only site that fits certain criteria. Staff has not researched these issue s to any extent and does not plan to do so until it receives direction from the City Council. M/Lyons asked the proposed size of the billboard and the district’s attorney responded that the proposed size was 14 feet x48 feet. M/Lyons asked how close the sign would be to residential properties and Dr. Torres responded that legal counsel believes it to be about 525 feet to the nearest residential property. M/Lyons asked CA/DeBerry if language could be included in the amendment to indicate no less than 525 feet from a residential property and CA/DeBerry said that if any other billboards were a llowed in the City it would be with a minimum 525 foot requirement from residential property. M/Lyons asked CDD/Gubman whether or not the matter of billboard signs came up during the General Plan process and CDD/Gubman responded that billboards were not discussed. C/Liu asked who determines what is aesthetically pleasing and wondered if the district had considered an analog billboard. Dr. Taylor responded 3.1.b Packet Pg. 14 FEBRUARY 2, 2021 PAGE 4 CITY COUNCIL that the City would ultimately determine what was aesthetically pleasing and analog billboards do not generate the type of revenue that a digital billboard generates. While this proposal is not just about money, it is a matter of whether the district wants to jump through all of these hoops for a nominal amount of revenue that will not positively im pact educational programs, students and the community. At the conclusion of Q&A, there were no further comments or direction offered by Council. 5.2 CANYON LOOP TRAIL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PRD/Wright provided the staff report on the project’s conceptual design plan and environmental documents. M/Lyons opened Public Comments. CC/Santana read the following public comments submitted via email: Sheri Liebe said via email that it was important to her that the City maintain the beauty and safety of the City’s trails. Amer Holmes hoped the City would preserve the ecosystem and environment. Stephanie Hawkins said that while she enjoys using the City’s trails, she is concerned about the Canyon Loop Trail project adversely affecting animals and trees and wants the City to use light impact trail building techniques to preserve the natural resources as well as, protect the area from future development. Jack Sun said that as a resident who uses the Canyon Loop trail, he believes the trail should be left in its natural terrain for the enjoyment of hikers, that it would adversely impact nature and wildlife, and that the trail area should be protected from future development. Barbara Armstrong recommended that this project be completed with cost-effective light construction to preserve the wildlife habitat. James Flournoy said that hand work to clean up the trail without disturbing habitat would be okay, that there should be no heavy mitigation construction, and that any work contemplated should begin after nesting season is over. Melissa Mills recommended the City Council reconsider using heavy equipment and instead consider a low impact trail project with a correct management plan to protect the natural habitat. 3.1.b Packet Pg. 15 FEBRUARY 2, 2021 PAGE 5 CITY COUNCIL James Hazlett urged the Council to vote against this proposal which presents a real threat to the City’s native habitat and wildlife areas and that the area should be exempted from housing development. Robin Smith, representing the Diamond Bar-Pomona Valley Sierra Club Task Force, urged the City to request guidance for low -impact trail build from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service for trail projects. Public comments offered telephonically: Diego Tamayo did not support the project du e to the threat he believed it imposes to the surrounding environment, especially the Coast Live Oaks. He supports low-impact trail mitigation and maintenance. Lee Paulson opposed the project and was concerned about saving Tres Hermanos and the City’s open spaces. He believes the answer to achieving the desired result would be a large number of seemingly inconsequential decisions which observe best conservation practices that embrace the letter and spirit o f the law by working with the expertise of governmental agencies which, in his opinion, this project does not do. Iris Mann opposed the project and hoped public comments about protecting the environment would be heard by the City Council. Paul Deibel said that as a trail user, the proposed improvements would be much appreciated. According to the staff report there was no contradiction between the project and the natural habitat proposed for mitigation and felt the project would be a great investment for the City. Kim Hsieh, Parks and Recreation Commissioner, believed that Diamond Bar has always been very careful about how these types of projects are moved forward to preserve natural habitats and environment as well as, the safety of those who use the trails. She agrees with others who have commented as such this evening and asked if the Parks and Recreation Department could look for a way to work around the trees and add benches and chairs. M/Lyons closed Public Comments. M/Lyons asked PRD/Wright to respond to comments about how this project would disturb wildlife and landscape. PRD/Wright responded that there are very specific mitigation measures regarding these issues. CDD/Gubman confirmed to M/Lyons that she is correct that staff made a significant effort in enlisting biological experts and experts in other environmental disciplines to prepare a detailed and legally defensible environmental document. The Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration that was prepared was subject to a 30 -day public review period that was also forwarded to the State Clearing House, which is 3.1.b Packet Pg. 16 FEBRUARY 2, 2021 PAGE 6 CITY COUNCIL responsible for distributing the Environmental Document to the trustee and responsible agencies, among which is the California Department of Fish and Wildlife that provided substantial detailed comments regarding mitigation, avoidance of work during nesting season, and replacement ratios of up to 5:1 onsite or off site, for any habitat that is removed in the course of the work. Staff presented the Mitigated Negative Declaration with mitigation measures that address all of these issues as we ll as, other topics that were not discussed today including Tribal Resources and Cultural Resources, and the final Mitigated Negative Declaration incorporated all of the comments provided by California Department Fish and Wildlife. As such, the final document does reflect their requirements and they will be a stakeholder as the City moves forward. The City will need to obtain permits from CDFW prior, during and for a monitoring period of years after the improvements are completed, for which the City will make a significant investment that will provide incentive to avoid habitat intrusion to the greatest extent possible. Allen Neshameny, Michael Baker International, Environmental Consultant to the project, concurred with CDD/Gubman’s summary regarding the lengths to which biological impacts were analyzed under the project and the mitigation to which the project will be subjected. There is an attachment to the final Initial Study before the Council tonight which is an extremely detailed habitat assessment that includes the result of numerous focus surveys that were done specifically for gnatcat cher and cactus wren to make certain there was an accurate and comprehensive baseline for existing conditions and what the project might impact. M/Lyons asked if the City is following the CDFW requirements in this project and Mr. Neshameny responded that as previously stated, this is the first step in a long process with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. The heart of the process will take shape once the permit applications and additional materials are forwarded to CDFW after final design occurs and once parameters of the project are better defined. Comments received from CDFW were taken to heart and in turn, a very detailed Response to Comments was prepared and is contained within the information provided to Council tonight. Modification s have been made to all of the biological measures at the recommendation of CDFW to make sure those measures are acceptable and effective as possible. MPT/Low asked for clarification regarding open space versus housing in accordance with the General Plan update. CDD/Gubman re sponded that there continues to be significant disinformation and fear -mongering regarding the fate of Diamond Bar’s open space. The General Plan update process designated this area as open space, that under the old General Plan would have accommodated development (about 300 acres). Open space in the General Plan update prevails and supersedes any zoning and rezoning follows after the General Plan update process as part of the implementation of the newly adopted General Plan. While the 3.1.b Packet Pg. 17 FEBRUARY 2, 2021 PAGE 7 CITY COUNCIL current zoning may be “residential”, the City adopted a General Plan that designates the area “open space” which means the City cannot develop or issue permits on any property unless the designation is consistent with the General Plan. If the zoning is inconsistent with the General Plan, it needs to be trued up to accommodate the General Plan desig nation. Moreover, the General Plan policy states that no open space designated land may be changed to another General Plan designation without bringing that forward to be placed on the ballot for a vote of the people. As such, the open space designation guarantees the preservation of open space to preserve the ecological resources of the community and any improvements made in open space areas are designed to support that ecological asset. CDD/Gubman further stated that staff is very appreciative of the e fforts of the Sierra Club and Responsible Land Use as well as, ot her stakeholders in the community for providing evidence and findings that there is critical habitat within the project area that supports the gnatcatcher and cactus wren and their early input that led to this substantial effort to vet the environmental impacts to the greatest extent possible which enabled to staff to provide an even more robust and extensive documentation of what resources are on the property. MPT/Low felt the amenities called out by public speakers are amenities that would be put to good use by hikers who use the trails. Trails are valued and treasured amenities for Diamond Bar. C/Tye thanked CDD/Gubman for reminding him of other controversial projects over the years, one of which included negotiations with a developer for what is now the Canyon Loop Trail. During that process, a previous Council Member or members insisted that it be specific that if this land use was proposed to be used for development it would have to go to a vote of the people and to that end, C/Tye felt it was very disingenuous to imply that houses in that area are a threat, something he believes would never happen. It is hard for him to believe that there is a cohort that is opposed to improving the City’s trails. What Diamond Bar has been able to do with what is available is remarkable to him and he believes that the Canyon Loops Trail benefits the community and improving them and making them better for everybody to enjoy is commendable. Public Comments are not ignored and it is important while considering the input to consider the facts and realize that this area will never have homes on it. C/Liu asked what systems are in place to guarantee the preservation of natural habitat during construction and what system does the City have in place to guarantee minimum impact during construction. PRD/Wright responded to C/Liu that specifically for this project, there is a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting program in place for the City and contractor to follow that identifies responsibility for monitoring compliance, prior to, during, and following construction. 3.1.b Packet Pg. 18 FEBRUARY 2, 2021 PAGE 8 CITY COUNCIL CDD/Gubman responded to C/Liu that through the Cit y’s ongoing work in partnership with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, an y plant material introduced into that site would be subject to approval of CDFW with very specific criteria for the type of plant material which would obviously be native plants that support the habitat. Moreover, the Scope of Work with Michael Baker International will include preparation of a Trail Management Plan to ensure ongoing maintenance of the natural habitat in a non-invasive and non-damaging manner. C/Chou asked for response to comments regarding low-impact construction and how it applies to th is project. Mr. Neshameny responded that regarding to low-impact jobs these types of measures generally focus on larger development projects that result in potential water quality concerns, new roadways, etc. and in this situation, there is a natural surface trail which would remain natural surface after implementation of this project and within these areas, the low-impact strategies do not come into play to any extent. C/Chou asked to what degree heavy equipment would be moved into this area. Mr. Neshameny reiterated that the magnitude of improvements will be relatively minimal and there will be no large bulldozers or other such equipment. Most of the work will be done by hand tools only. PRD/Wright agreed and asked the Council to keep in mind that this project is in the conceptual plan phase. Staff will be working with the landscape architect this spring to finalize documents including constructio n plans with the intent to minimize any impact to the environment. He anticipates that would limit construction to hand tools and by hand work and not heavy equipment. Once it has been determined what improvements will be made and what kind of equipment will be necessary to complete the work, this matter will be brought back to Council for consideration. MPT/Low moved, M/Lyons seconded, to adopt Resolution 2021-04 approving and adopting the final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Canyon Loop Trail Improvement Project and directing City staff to file a Notice of Determination. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Chou, Liu, Tye, MPT/Low, M/Lyons NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None C/Tye moved, MPT/Low seconded, to approve the Canyon Loop Trail Improvement Project. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Chou, Liu, Tye, MPT/Low, 3.1.b Packet Pg. 19 FEBRUARY 2, 2021 PAGE 9 CITY COUNCIL M/Lyons NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None 6. COUNCIL SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS AND MEETING ATTENDANCE REPORTS/COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS: C/Chou thanked staff for their due diligence in preparing and executing documents for tonight’s meeting and said he appreciated public comments on agenda items which are taken seriously by the Councilmembers. He reported on the January food and mask distribution event, hosting of a town hall on the vaccine rollout, the town hall promoted by Senator Newman with a focus on his commitment to help with funding of the SR/57 Confluence Project and reopening of the school districts, and the Food Donation Drive on Saturday, February 6th at the United Church of Christ from 10:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. C/Liu thanked staff and consultants for their thorough presentations and residents for the lively discussions and input, thanked M/Lyons and Council Members for working together with staff for taking swift action in working with Waste Management to address community concerns, thanked the community for their help in adjusting to the new waste pickup schedule and thanked Terri Muse of Waste Management for addressing the special needs of the community members. He thanked the community for working together and hoped everyone would remain safe. C/Tye said that rather than traveling to Sacramento for the Legislative Tour and talk with assembly members and senators, they participated in a virtual tour this year. He echoed C/Liu’s comments about Waste Management and how they dealt with a very difficult situation, thanks to Terri Muse who took the City’s concerns to corporate management. M/Lyons announced that MPT/Low left the meeting. M/Lyons reported that she, MPT/Low and CM/Fox met with newly elected Congresswoman Young Kim for discussion about community concerns, talked about the Safer Internet Day, and reported on the Council of Governments meeting on homelessness. M/Lyons said she would be adjourning tonight’s meeting in memory of former City employee Phil Williams who with his wife, Reverend Pat Williams, have lived in Diamond Bar for almost 55 years of their 65 year marriage. ADJOURNMENT: With no further business to conduct, M/Lyons adjourned the Regular City Council Meeting at 8:39 p.m. in memory of Phil Williams. 3.1.b Packet Pg. 20 FEBRUARY 2, 2021 PAGE 10 CITY COUNCIL Respectfully submitted: __________________________ Kristina Santana, City Clerk The foregoing minutes are hereby approved this 16th day of February, 2021. __________________________ Nancy Lyons, Mayor 3.1.b Packet Pg. 21 Agenda #: 3.2 Meeting Date: February 16, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Daniel Fox, City Manager TITLE: RATIFICATION OF CHECK REGISTER DATED JANUARY 28, 2021 THROUGH FEBRUARY 10, 2021 TOTALING $396,885.74. STRATEGIC GOAL: Responsible Stewardship of Public Resources RECOMMENDATION: Ratify the Check Register. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Expenditure of $396,885.74. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The City has established the policy of issuing accounts payable checks on a weekly basis with City Council ratification at the next scheduled City Council Meeting. The attached check register containing checks dated January 28, 2021 through February 10, 2021 totaling $396,885.74 is being presented for ratification. All payments have been made in compliance with the City’s purchasing p olicies and procedures, and have been reviewed and approved by the appropriate departmental staff . The attached Affidavit affirms that the check register has been audited and deemed accurate by the Finance Director. PREPARED BY: 3.2 Packet Pg. 22 REVIEWED BY: Attachments: 1. 3.2.a Check Register Affidavit 2-16-2021 2. 3.2.b Check Register 2-16-2021 3.2 Packet Pg. 23 3.2.a Packet Pg. 24 City of Diamond Bar Check Register CHECK # CHECK DATE VENDOR NAME OTP VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION ORG OBJECT AMOUNT 1211 2/10/2021 AARON R SALO STIPEND PARKS & REC MTG - 01.28.21 100520 52525 $45.00 CHECK TOTAL $45.00 1212 2/10/2021 ADAPT CONSULTING INC USED OIL GRANT SUPPLIES 253180 51300 $1,698.70 CHECK TOTAL $1,698.70 1213 2/10/2021 AFLAC SUPP INS PREM FOR JAN 2021 100 21117 $2,590.21 CHECK TOTAL $2,590.21 1214 2/10/2021 ANIMAL PEST MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC COMPREHENSIVE PEST CONTROL - DBC, CITY HALL, PARKS 100630 52320 $70.00 2/10/2021 ANIMAL PEST MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC COMPREHENSIVE PEST CONTROL - DBC, CITY HALL, PARKS 100510 52320 $105.00 2/10/2021 ANIMAL PEST MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC COMPREHENSIVE PEST CONTROL - DBC, CITY HALL, PARKS 100620 52320 $120.00 CHECK TOTAL $295.00 1215 2/10/2021 NAILA ASAD BARLAS STIPEND PC MTG ATTENDANCE – 1/12/21 100410 52525 $65.00 CHECK TOTAL $65.00 1216 2/10/2021 BEST LIGHTING PRODUCTS INC MONTHLY MAINTENANCE - JANUARY 2021 100620 52320 $115.80 2/10/2021 BEST LIGHTING PRODUCTS INC MONTHLY MAINTENANCE - JANUARY 2021 100510 52320 $165.80 2/10/2021 BEST LIGHTING PRODUCTS INC MONTHLY MAINTENANCE - JANUARY 2021 238638 52320 $223.56 2/10/2021 BEST LIGHTING PRODUCTS INC MONTHLY MAINTENANCE - JANUARY 2021 100630 55505 $1,524.67 CHECK TOTAL $2,029.83 1217 2/10/2021 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE - DECEMBER 2020 100510 55505 $6,044.00 2/10/2021 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE - DECEMBER 2020 100630 55505 $29,719.00 2/10/2021 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC ADDL' LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE - HERITAGE PARK 100630 52320 $440.00 2/10/2021 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC ADDL LANDSCAPE MAINT-RONALD REAGAN PARK 100630 52320 $194.90 CHECK TOTAL $36,397.90 3.2.b Packet Pg. 25 City of Diamond Bar Check Register CHECK # CHECK DATE VENDOR NAME OTP VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION ORG OBJECT AMOUNT 1218 2/10/2021 CANNON CORPORATION GRADING PLAN REVIEW - 805 S. BREA CANYON RD. 100 22109 $635.00 2/10/2021 CANNON CORPORATION GRADING PLAN REVIEW - 23663 MEADCLIFF 100 22109 $530.00 2/10/2021 CANNON CORPORATION GRADING PLAN REVIEW - 850 S. BREA CANYON 100 22109 $560.00 2/10/2021 CANNON CORPORATION HYDROLOGY REVIEW - 22438 STEEPLECHASE 100 22109 $665.00 2/10/2021 CANNON CORPORATION INSPECTION - TR 63623 SOUTH POINTE 100 22109 $340.00 2/10/2021 CANNON CORPORATION INSPECTION - 2759 STEEPLECHASE 100615 54440 $462.00 2/10/2021 CANNON CORPORATION INSPECTION - 2740 STEEPLECHASE 100 22109 $399.62 2/10/2021 CANNON CORPORATION INSPECTION - 2315 ALAMO HEIGHTS 100 22109 $462.00 2/10/2021 CANNON CORPORATION INSPECTION - 700 FARBEN 100 22109 $195.87 2/10/2021 CANNON CORPORATION INSPECTION - 1607 DERRINGER 100615 54440 $210.35 2/10/2021 CANNON CORPORATION FINAL MAP - 850 BREA CANYON 100 22109 $1,020.00 2/10/2021 CANNON CORPORATION PLAN CHECK - 2775 SHADOW CANYON 100615 54420 $772.50 2/10/2021 CANNON CORPORATION GRADING PLAN REVIEW - 850 S. BREA CANYON RD 100 22109 $525.00 2/10/2021 CANNON CORPORATION ON-CALL/GENERAL ENGR - DESIGN SERVICES JAN 2021 100615 54400 $210.00 CHECK TOTAL $6,987.34 1219 2/10/2021 COLLEY AUTO CARS INC VEHICLE MAINTENANCE - FACILITIES & MAINTENANCE 502630 52312 $2,395.58 2/10/2021 COLLEY AUTO CARS INC VEHICLE MAINTENANCE - PARKS & FACILITIES 502630 52312 $17.61 2/10/2021 COLLEY AUTO CARS INC VEHICLE MAINTENANCE - ROAD MAINTENANCE 502655 52312 $376.86 CHECK TOTAL $2,790.05 1220 2/10/2021 DAPEER ROSENBLIT & LITVAK LLP CITY PROSECUTOR - CODE ENFORCEMENT -DEC 2020 100120 54024 $1,127.65 CHECK TOTAL $1,127.65 1221 2/10/2021 DELTA DENTAL HMO DENTAL INS PREM FOR FEB 2021 100 21105 $322.82 CHECK TOTAL $322.82 3.2.b Packet Pg. 26 City of Diamond Bar Check Register CHECK # CHECK DATE VENDOR NAME OTP VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION ORG OBJECT AMOUNT 1222 2/10/2021 DELTA DENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY PPO DENTAL INS PREM FOR FEB 2021 100 21105 $5,036.65 CHECK TOTAL $5,036.65 1223 2/10/2021 CAROL A DENNIS MINUTE SECRETARY FOR COUNCIL MEETINGS IN JAN 2021 100130 54900 $500.00 2/10/2021 CAROL A DENNIS MINUTES - PARKS & REC COMMISSION MEETING 100520 54900 $75.00 CHECK TOTAL $575.00 1224 2/10/2021 DIAMOND BAR MOBIL VEHICLE MAINT - PARKS & FACILITIES - 1210108 502630 52312 $49.95 2/10/2021 DIAMOND BAR MOBIL VEHICLE MAINT - POOL VEHICLE - 1338160 502620 52312 $49.95 2/10/2021 DIAMOND BAR MOBIL VEHICLE MAINT - POOL VEHICLE - 1315342 502620 52312 $49.95 CHECK TOTAL $149.85 1225 2/10/2021 DIANA CHO & ASSOCIATES CDBG PROGRAM CONSULTANT-NOV DEC 2020 225440 54900 $820.00 CHECK TOTAL $820.00 1226 2/10/2021 DOGGIE WALK BAGS INC DOGGIE BAGS - FEBRUARY 2021 250170 51200 $1,051.20 CHECK TOTAL $1,051.20 1227 2/10/2021 ECOFERT INC FERTILIZER INJECTION SYSTEM - JAN 2021 100630 52320 $1,150.00 CHECK TOTAL $1,150.00 1228 2/10/2021 EMERALD LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC LANDSCAPING SERVICES AT CITY HALL - JANUARY 2021 100620 52320 $1,026.00 CHECK TOTAL $1,026.00 1229 2/10/2021 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATES CEQA CONSULTING SVCS-TTM54081- DECEMBER 2020 100 22107 $7,430.00 CHECK TOTAL $7,430.00 1230 2/10/2021 EXPRESS MAIL CORPORATE ACCOUNT NEXT DAY MAIL-9/22/20 PCAGENDA REPORT TO APPLICANT 100 22107 $23.00 2/10/2021 EXPRESS MAIL CORPORATE ACCOUNT NEXT DAY MAIL 9/22/20 PCAGENDA REPT TO PROP OWNER 100 22107 $22.75 2/10/2021 EXPRESS MAIL CORPORATE ACCOUNT NEXT DAY MAIL 9/22/20 PCAGENDA PKT TO CITY ATTY 100410 52170 $23.25 2/10/2021 EXPRESS MAIL CORPORATE ACCOUNT NEXT DAY MAIL 11/24/21 PCAGENDA REPT TO APPLICANT 100 22107 $24.25 3.2.b Packet Pg. 27 City of Diamond Bar Check Register CHECK # CHECK DATE VENDOR NAME OTP VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION ORG OBJECT AMOUNT 2/10/2021 EXPRESS MAIL CORPORATE ACCOUNT NEXT DAY MAIL 11/24/20 PCAGENDA REPT TO PROP OWNER 100 22107 $24.25 2/10/2021 EXPRESS MAIL CORPORATE ACCOUNT NEXT DAY MAIL 12/8/20 PCAGENDA RPT TO CITY ATTY 100410 52170 $24.75 2/10/2021 EXPRESS MAIL CORPORATE ACCOUNT NEXT DAY MAIL 12/8/21 PCAGENDA RPT TO APPLICANT 100 22107 $24.25 2/10/2021 EXPRESS MAIL CORPORATE ACCOUNT NEXT DAY MAIL 12/8/20 PCAGENDA RPT TO PROP OWNER 100 22107 $24.25 CHECK TOTAL $190.75 1231 2/10/2021 GERALDINE KELLER CONTRACT CLASS INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 100520 55320 $18.00 CHECK TOTAL $18.00 1232 2/10/2021 GLADWELL GOVERNMENTAL SVCS INC RECORD RETENTION SERVICES FOR FY 20/21 100130 54900 $250.00 CHECK TOTAL $250.00 1233 2/10/2021 GRAFFITI CONTROL SYSTEMS GRAFFITI ABATEMENT-DEC 2020 100430 55540 $2,975.00 CHECK TOTAL $2,975.00 1234 2/10/2021 GUARANTEED JANITORIAL SERVICE INC JANITORIAL SVCS - CITY HALL, DBC, PARKS JAN 2021 100630 55505 $2,450.00 2/10/2021 GUARANTEED JANITORIAL SERVICE INC JANITORIAL SVCS - CITY HALL, DBC, PARKS JAN 2021 100510 55505 $5,400.00 2/10/2021 GUARANTEED JANITORIAL SERVICE INC JANITORIAL SVCS - CITY HALL, DBC, PARKS JAN 2021 100620 52320 $8,724.00 CHECK TOTAL $16,574.00 1235 2/10/2021 HD SUPPLY CONSTRUCTION LTD ROAD MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - STRAW WATTLES 100655 51250 $917.27 CHECK TOTAL $917.27 1236 2/10/2021 HDL COREN & CONE PROF. SVCS - PROPERTY TAX JAN-MAR 2021 100210 54010 $3,448.07 CHECK TOTAL $3,448.07 1237 2/10/2021 HR GREEN PACIFIC INC GRADING PLAN CHECK - 23331 RIDGELINE 100615 54420 $96.34 2/10/2021 HR GREEN PACIFIC INC GRADING PLAN CHECK - 22307 BROKEN TWIG 100615 54420 $131.59 2/10/2021 HR GREEN PACIFIC INC HYDROLOGY REVIEW - 2432 INDIAN CREEK 100 22109 $927.00 3.2.b Packet Pg. 28 City of Diamond Bar Check Register CHECK # CHECK DATE VENDOR NAME OTP VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION ORG OBJECT AMOUNT 2/10/2021 HR GREEN PACIFIC INC LID REVIEW/PLAN CHECK - 23509 RIDGELINE 100 22109 $18.00 2/10/2021 HR GREEN PACIFIC INC GRADING PLAN CHECK - 2244 INDIAN CREEK 100 22109 $272.00 2/10/2021 HR GREEN PACIFIC INC PLAN CHECK - 22307 BROKEN TWIG 100 22109 $1,153.00 2/10/2021 HR GREEN PACIFIC INC GRADING PLAN CHECK - 2668 BLAZE TRAIL 100 22109 $136.00 2/10/2021 HR GREEN PACIFIC INC PLAN CHECK - 22307 BROKEN TWIG 100615 54420 $394.79 2/10/2021 HR GREEN PACIFIC INC INSPECTION - 1810 DIAMOND KNOLL 100615 54440 $343.82 2/10/2021 HR GREEN PACIFIC INC PLAN CHECK - 2244 INDIAN CREEK 100 22109 $113.50 2/10/2021 HR GREEN PACIFIC INC PLAN CHECK - 22307 BROKEN TWIG 100 22109 $1,865.00 2/10/2021 HR GREEN PACIFIC INC PLAN CHECK - 2589 PACIFIC LANE 100 22109 $318.00 2/10/2021 HR GREEN PACIFIC INC PLAN CHECK - 23331 RIDGELINE 100 22109 $556.50 2/10/2021 HR GREEN PACIFIC INC INSPECTION - 2909 STEEPLECHASE 100615 54440 $717.70 2/10/2021 HR GREEN PACIFIC INC INSPECTION - 2909 STEEPLECHASE 100 22109 $57.30 2/10/2021 HR GREEN PACIFIC INC PLAN CHECK - 22307 BROKEN TWIG 100615 54420 $522.50 2/10/2021 HR GREEN PACIFIC INC GRADING PLAN REVIEW - 23331 RIDGELINE 100 22109 $859.00 CHECK TOTAL $8,482.04 1238 2/10/2021 HUMANE SOCIETY OF POMONA VALLEY INC ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES FOR FEB. 2021 100340 55404 $16,690.33 CHECK TOTAL $16,690.33 1239 2/10/2021 JACKSON'S AUTO SUPPLY/NAPA SMALL TOOL FOR FUEL USE 100655 52310 $15.05 2/10/2021 JACKSON'S AUTO SUPPLY/NAPA SMALL TOOL FOR FUEL USE 100630 52320 $15.86 2/10/2021 JACKSON'S AUTO SUPPLY/NAPA FUEL FOR SMALL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT 100630 52320 $108.00 2/10/2021 JACKSON'S AUTO SUPPLY/NAPA FUEL FOR SMALL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT 100655 52310 $184.95 CHECK TOTAL $323.86 1240 2/10/2021 JCL TRAFFIC SERVICES ROAD MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - TRAFFIC SIGNS 100655 51250 $949.91 CHECK TOTAL $949.91 3.2.b Packet Pg. 29 City of Diamond Bar Check Register CHECK # CHECK DATE VENDOR NAME OTP VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION ORG OBJECT AMOUNT 1241 2/10/2021 JHD PLANNING LLC HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE - JULY TO DEC 2020 103410 54300 $24,450.00 CHECK TOTAL $24,450.00 1242 2/10/2021 JIVE COMMUNICATIONS INC CITY PHONE SYSTEM - JANUARY 2021 100230 52200 $2,464.06 2/10/2021 JIVE COMMUNICATIONS INC CITY PHONE SYSTEM - FEBRIARY 2021 100230 52200 $2,464.06 CHECK TOTAL $4,928.12 1243 2/10/2021 KENNETH L MOK STIPEND PC MTG ATTENDANCE 1/12/21 100410 52525 $65.00 CHECK TOTAL $65.00 1244 2/10/2021 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC ON-CALL TRAFFIC ENGR. - DEC 2020 100615 54410 $578.80 2/10/2021 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC TRAFFIC REVIEW - 1139 S. DBB 100 22109 $535.40 2/10/2021 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC PARKING STUDY REVIEW - 1900 S. BREA CANYON RD 100 22107 $856.62 2/10/2021 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC CROOKED CREEK RESIDENTIAL - VMT SCREENING 100 22107 $289.40 CHECK TOTAL $2,260.22 1245 2/10/2021 LANDS' END INC CITY COUNCIL APPAREL 100240 51400 $152.02 CHECK TOTAL $152.02 1246 2/10/2021 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES MEMBERSHIP DUES FOR 2021 100130 52400 $18,427.00 CHECK TOTAL $18,427.00 1247 2/10/2021 LOS ANGELES COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS SUMP PUMP MAINT @ SYCAMORE PARK - THRU DEC 2020 100630 52320 $4,913.09 2/10/2021 LOS ANGELES COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS SEWER SERVICE FOR PARK PARCELS - FY 20-21 100630 52320 $252.50 2/10/2021 LOS ANGELES COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS CATCH BASIN CLEANOUT - FY 19-20 - EAST AREA B 100655 55532 $5,244.25 2/10/2021 LOS ANGELES COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS AFTER HOURS EMERGENCY ROAD MAINTENANCE WORK 100655 55512 $702.74 CHECK TOTAL $11,112.58 1248 2/10/2021 MAHENDRA GARG STIPEND PC MTG 1/12/21 100410 52525 $65.00 CHECK TOTAL $65.00 1249 2/10/2021 MANISHA SULAKHE STIPEND PARKS & REC MTG - 01.28.21 100520 52525 $45.00 CHECK TOTAL $45.00 3.2.b Packet Pg. 30 City of Diamond Bar Check Register CHECK # CHECK DATE VENDOR NAME OTP VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION ORG OBJECT AMOUNT 1250 2/10/2021 MCE CORPORATION LANDSCAPE MAINT - DISTRICTS 38, 39, 41 - JAN2021 241641 55524 $4,922.61 2/10/2021 MCE CORPORATION LANDSCAPE MAINT - DISTRICTS 38, 39, 41 - JAN2021 239639 55524 $12,173.54 2/10/2021 MCE CORPORATION LANDSCAPE MAINT - DISTRICTS 38, 39, 41 - JAN2021 238638 55524 $14,806.30 2/10/2021 MCE CORPORATION STREET MAINTENANCE & VEGETATION CONTROL - JAN 2021 100655 55530 $537.36 2/10/2021 MCE CORPORATION STREET MAINTENANCE & VEGETATION CONTROL - JAN 2021 100655 55532 $2,159.43 2/10/2021 MCE CORPORATION STREET MAINTENANCE & VEGETATION CONTROL - JAN 2021 100655 55528 $7,317.96 CHECK TOTAL $41,917.20 1251 2/10/2021 MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL INC CANYON LOOP TRAIL CEQA DEC 2020 301630 56104 $4,370.50 CHECK TOTAL $4,370.50 1252 2/10/2021 MICHAEL FREDERICK SUMPTION ANNUAL MAINT/SUPPORT - CONTRACT MGMT 100230 52314 $3,000.00 CHECK TOTAL $3,000.00 1253 2/10/2021 NORTH AMERICAN YOUTH ACTIVITIES LLC WINTER 2021 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 100520 55320 $32.40 CHECK TOTAL $32.40 1254 2/10/2021 OFFICE SOLUTIONS SUPPLIES - COVID-19 106130 51200 $506.59 2/10/2021 OFFICE SOLUTIONS SUPPLIES - COVID-19 106130 51200 $180.54 2/10/2021 OFFICE SOLUTIONS OFFICE SUPPLIES - CITY MANAGER 100130 51200 $370.26 2/10/2021 OFFICE SOLUTIONS OFFICE ORDER DBC 100510 51200 $73.90 CHECK TOTAL $1,131.29 1255 2/10/2021 ONE TIME PAY VENDOR AKBAR ALI EVENT REFUND 100 20202 $2,604.00 CHECK TOTAL $2,604.00 1256 2/10/2021 ONE TIME PAY VENDOR CESAR TUNGOL III EVENT REFUND 100 20202 $1,980.00 CHECK TOTAL $1,980.00 1257 2/10/2021 ONE TIME PAY VENDOR HARBAN GOR EVENT REFUND 100 20202 $2,033.46 CHECK TOTAL $2,033.46 3.2.b Packet Pg. 31 City of Diamond Bar Check Register CHECK # CHECK DATE VENDOR NAME OTP VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION ORG OBJECT AMOUNT 1258 2/10/2021 ONE TIME PAY VENDOR MARIA RODRIGUEZ EVENT REFUND 100 20202 $1,980.00 CHECK TOTAL $1,980.00 1259 2/10/2021 ONE TIME PAY VENDOR MARITZA VALENZUELA EVENT REFUND 100 20202 $2,603.45 CHECK TOTAL $2,603.45 1260 2/10/2021 ONE TIME PAY VENDOR ROSA PADILLA EVENT REFUND 100 20202 $1,520.00 CHECK TOTAL $1,520.00 1261 2/10/2021 ONE TIME PAY VENDOR TRECIA HOPSON EVENT CANCELED 100 20202 $1,812.66 CHECK TOTAL $1,812.66 1262 2/10/2021 PAPER RECYCLING & SHREDDING PAPER RECYCLING CITY HALL 250170 55000 $163.00 2/10/2021 PAPER RECYCLING & SHREDDING PAPER RECYCLING CITY HALL 250170 55000 $65.00 2/10/2021 PAPER RECYCLING & SHREDDING PAPER RECYCLING CITY HALL 250170 55000 $138.00 2/10/2021 PAPER RECYCLING & SHREDDING PAPER RECYCLING CITY HALL 250170 55000 $65.00 2/10/2021 PAPER RECYCLING & SHREDDING PAPER RECYCLING CITY HALL 250170 55000 $215.00 2/10/2021 PAPER RECYCLING & SHREDDING PAPER RECYCLING 250170 55000 $175.00 2/10/2021 PAPER RECYCLING & SHREDDING PAPER RECYCLING 250170 55000 $65.00 CHECK TOTAL $886.00 1263 2/10/2021 QUADIENT FINANCE USA INC POSTAGE METER RENTAL CHARGE 100130 52170 $985.50 CHECK TOTAL $985.50 1264 2/10/2021 QUINN RENTAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT RENTAL - ROAD MAINTENANCE 100655 52300 $654.91 CHECK TOTAL $654.91 1265 2/10/2021 RAYMOND WALTER WOLFE STIPEND PC MTG 1/12/21 100410 52525 $65.00 CHECK TOTAL $65.00 1266 2/10/2021 RKA CONSULTING GROUP BUILDING AND SAFETY SERVICES - DEC 2020 100420 55100 $36,073.01 2/10/2021 RKA CONSULTING GROUP BUILDING AND SAFETY -PLNG ASSISTANCE DEC2020 100420 55100 $5,280.00 3.2.b Packet Pg. 32 City of Diamond Bar Check Register CHECK # CHECK DATE VENDOR NAME OTP VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION ORG OBJECT AMOUNT CHECK TOTAL $41,353.01 1267 2/10/2021 ROTO-ROOTER SERVICES COMPANY SYCAMORE CANYON PARK RESTROOM MAINTENANCE 100630 52320 $446.00 2/10/2021 ROTO-ROOTER SERVICES COMPANY PARKS & FACILITIES - BUILDING MAINTENANCE 100630 52320 $446.00 CHECK TOTAL $892.00 1268 2/10/2021 SCMAF SOUTHERN CA MUNICIPAL ATHLETIC FOUNDATION (SCMAF) MEMBERSHIP DUES 2021 100520 52400 $310.00 CHECK TOTAL $310.00 1269 2/10/2021 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE - DEC 2020 207650 55536 $4,554.00 2/10/2021 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC TS MAINTENANCE - CALL OUTS - DEC 2020 207650 55536 $7,368.99 CHECK TOTAL $11,922.99 1270 2/10/2021 SIMPSON ADVERTISING INC JANUARY 2021 NEWSLETTER AND RECREATION GUIDE 100240 54900 $3,695.00 CHECK TOTAL $3,695.00 1271 2/10/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON TRAFFIC CONTROL - 801 S LEMON & VARIOUS TC-1 100655 52210 $329.30 2/10/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3334 1/2 BREA CANYON ROAD 12.23.20 - 1.25.21 100630 52210 $6.72 2/10/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21810 COPLEY DR - 12.16.20 - 01.15.21 100620 52210 $9,172.02 2/10/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON DISTRICT 41 - JAN 2021 241641 52210 $129.02 2/10/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON PARKS - JAN 2021 100630 52210 $2,433.95 2/10/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON DISTRICT 39 - JAN 2021 239639 52210 $227.62 2/10/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON DISTRICT 38 - JAN 2021 238638 52210 $304.50 2/10/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON TRAFFIC CONTROL - BREA CYN/FALLOWFIELD 100655 52210 $150.47 2/10/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON TRAFFIC CONTROL - 21010 WASINGTON ST. TC-1 100655 52210 $83.99 2/10/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON TRAFFIC CONTROL - 1179 DBB & VARIOUS TC-1 100655 52210 $3,087.37 2/10/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON TRAFFIC CONTROL - 1798 DBB/22566 GOLDEN SPRINGS 100655 52210 $248.49 2/10/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON TRAFFIC CONTROL - 2201 DBB PED TC-1 100655 52210 $57.74 3.2.b Packet Pg. 33 City of Diamond Bar Check Register CHECK # CHECK DATE VENDOR NAME OTP VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION ORG OBJECT AMOUNT 2/10/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON TRAFFIC CONTROL - 1450 BRIDGEGATE & VARIOUS 100655 52210 $478.19 2/10/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SAFETY LIGHTS - 3564 BREA CANYON RD LS-3 100655 52210 $85.65 2/10/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON TRAFFIC CONTROL - 809 S. DBB TC-1 100655 52210 $104.63 2/10/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON TRAFFIC CONTROL - 1611 S. BREA CANYON RD TC-1 100655 52210 $71.81 2/10/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON TRAFFIC CONTROL - 801 S. LEMON & VARIOUS TC-1 100655 52210 $334.97 2/10/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON TRAFFIC CONTROL - 1395 S. DBB & VARIOUS TC-1 100655 52210 $1,072.19 2/10/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SAFETY LIGHTS - 3201 DBB LS-2 100655 52210 $78.12 2/10/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SAFETY LIGHTS - 1025 BREA CANYON LS- 2 100655 52210 $83.23 2/10/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SAFETY LIGHTS - 1DBB/TEMPLE LS-2 100655 52210 $74.87 2/10/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SAFETY LIGHTS - BREA CANYON/FALLOWFIELD 100655 52210 $51.98 2/10/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SAFETY LIGHTS - BREA CANYON/OAKCREST LS-2 100655 52210 $39.65 2/10/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SAFETY LIGHTS - 21010 WASHINGTON ST. LS-2 100655 52210 $62.38 2/10/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SAFETY LIGHTS - 24230 GOLDEN SPRINGS LS-2 100655 52210 $49.48 2/10/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SAFETY LIGHTS - 22805 GOLDEN SPRINGS LS-2 100655 52210 $65.10 2/10/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SAFETY LIGHTS - 21325 PATHFINDER LS-2 100655 52210 $143.13 2/10/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SAFETY LIGHTS - 21250 GOLDEN SPRINGS LS-2 100655 52210 $52.09 2/10/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SAFETY LIGHTS - 1003 GOLDEN SPRINGS LS-2 100655 52210 $68.74 2/10/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SAFETY LIGHTS - 2201 DBB LS-2 100655 52210 $52.09 2/10/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SAFETY LIGHTS - 3798 BREA CANYON RD LS-2 100655 52210 $39.07 2/10/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SAFETY LIGHTS - 21615 GATEWAY CENTER DR LS-2 100655 52210 $52.09 2/10/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SAFETY LIGHTS - 1798 DBB/22566 GOLDEN SPRINGS LS-2 100655 52210 $117.08 3.2.b Packet Pg. 34 City of Diamond Bar Check Register CHECK # CHECK DATE VENDOR NAME OTP VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION ORG OBJECT AMOUNT 2/10/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON TRAFFIC CONTROL - DBB N/W @ TEMPLE TC-1 100655 52210 $40.17 CHECK TOTAL $19,447.90 1272 2/10/2021 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY LIFE/SUPP/LTD/STD INS PREM FOR FEB 2021 100 21107 $660.00 2/10/2021 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY LIFE/SUPP/LTD/STD INS PREM FOR FEB 2021 100 21107 $964.75 2/10/2021 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY LIFE/SUPP/LTD/STD INS PREM FOR FEB 2021 100 21113 $2,153.19 CHECK TOTAL $3,777.94 1273 2/10/2021 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC TRAFFIC STUDY - 850 BREA CANYON ROAD 100 22109 $949.00 2/10/2021 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC TRAFFIC STUDY/ROAD REVIEW - 850 S. BREA CANYON RD 100 22109 $973.00 CHECK TOTAL $1,922.00 1274 2/10/2021 TEMCAL DEVELOPMENT CORP VEHICLE MAINTENANCE - DECEMBER 2020 502630 52312 $106.99 2/10/2021 TEMCAL DEVELOPMENT CORP VEHICLE MAINTENANCE - DECEMBER 2020 502620 52312 $353.82 CHECK TOTAL $460.81 1275 2/10/2021 THE COMDYN GROUP INC GIS SUPPORT - JAN 2021 100230 54900 $2,144.61 CHECK TOTAL $2,144.61 1276 2/10/2021 THE SAN GABRIEL VALLEY NEWSPAPER GR LEGAL AD - PC MTG 1/12/21 2366 CLEAR CREEK LN 100 22107 $575.00 CHECK TOTAL $575.00 1277 2/10/2021 THE TAIT GROUP INC CS - VARIOUS TRAFFIC RELATED PROJECTS JAN 2021 100615 54410 $6,500.00 CHECK TOTAL $6,500.00 1278 2/10/2021 TUCKER TIRE COMPANY INC VEHICLE MAINTENANCE - ROAD MAINTENANCE 502655 52312 $778.38 CHECK TOTAL $778.38 1279 2/10/2021 VALLEY VISTA SERVICES , INC. STREET SWEEPING SERVICES - JAN 2021 100655 55510 $29,359.02 CHECK TOTAL $29,359.02 1280 2/10/2021 VERMONT SYSTEMS INC SYSTEM UPGRADE SUPPORT 100230 52314 $125.00 CHECK TOTAL $125.00 3.2.b Packet Pg. 35 City of Diamond Bar Check Register CHECK # CHECK DATE VENDOR NAME OTP VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION ORG OBJECT AMOUNT 1281 2/10/2021 VISION SERVICE PLAN VISION INS PREM FOR FEB 2021 100 21108 $2,032.02 CHECK TOTAL $2,032.02 1282 2/10/2021 WW GRAINGER INC OPERATING SUPPLIES - CITY HALL 100620 51200 $279.01 2/10/2021 WW GRAINGER INC BUILDING MAINTENANCE - DBC 100510 52320 $680.65 CHECK TOTAL $959.66 1283 2/10/2021 WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT PARKS - DEC 2020 - PT 3 100630 52220 $824.09 2/10/2021 WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT DIST 41 - DEC 2020 - PT 2 241641 52220 $3,946.64 CHECK TOTAL $4,770.73 1284 2/10/2021 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY JANITORIAL SUPPLIES - CITY HALL 100620 51200 $318.43 CHECK TOTAL $318.43 1285 2/10/2021 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC CITYWIDE TREE WATERING 1.1.21 - 1.15.21 100645 55522 $1,360.00 2/10/2021 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC TREE CARE AND MAINTENANCE - DISTRICT 39 239639 55522 $395.00 2/10/2021 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC TREE CARE AND MAINTENANCE - DISTRICT 38 238638 55522 $961.00 2/10/2021 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC CITYWIDE TREE CARE AND MAINTENANCE - 1.1.21 - 1.15 100645 55522 $8,461.50 CHECK TOTAL $11,177.50 1286 2/10/2021 WILLDAN GEOTECHNICAL GEOTECH REVIEW - 1415 STONECREST - 1/1/21 100 22109 $210.00 2/10/2021 WILLDAN GEOTECHNICAL GEOTECH REVIEW - 1810 DIAMOND KNOLL - 1/1/21 100 22109 $400.00 2/10/2021 WILLDAN GEOTECHNICAL GEOTECH REVIEW - 2759 STEEPLECHASE 100 22109 $400.00 2/10/2021 WILLDAN GEOTECHNICAL GEOTECH REVIEW - 2315 ALAMO HEIGHTS 100 22109 $400.00 2/10/2021 WILLDAN GEOTECHNICAL GEOTECH REVIEW - 2432 INDIAN CREEK 100 22109 $400.00 2/10/2021 WILLDAN GEOTECHNICAL GEOTECH REVIEW - 2740 STEEPLECHASE 100 22109 $400.00 2/10/2021 WILLDAN GEOTECHNICAL GEOTECH REVIEW - 20305 FLINTGATE 100 22109 $400.00 2/10/2021 WILLDAN GEOTECHNICAL GEOTECH REVIEW - 23663 MEADCLIFF 100 22109 $200.00 CHECK TOTAL $2,810.00 1287 2/10/2021 WILLIAM AUSTIN RAWLINGS STIPEND PC MTG 1/12/21 100410 52525 $65.00 3.2.b Packet Pg. 36 City of Diamond Bar Check Register CHECK # CHECK DATE VENDOR NAME OTP VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION ORG OBJECT AMOUNT CHECK TOTAL $65.00 GRAND TOTAL $396,885.74 3.2.b Packet Pg. 37 Agenda #: 3.3 Meeting Date: February 16, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Daniel Fox, City Manager TITLE: TREASURER'S STATEMENT STRATEGIC GOAL: Responsible Stewardship of Public Resources RECOMMENDATION: Approve the August 2020 and the Revised July 2020 Treasurer's Statements. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Consistent with City policy, the Finance Department presents the monthly Treasurer’s Statement of August 2020 to the City Council for review and approval. This statement shows the cash balances with a breakdown of various investment accounts and the yield to maturity from investments. This statement also includes an investment portfolio management report which details the activities of investments. All investments have been made in accordance with the City’s Investment Policy. Also included for the City Council’s review and approval is a revised July Treasurer’s Statement. The July report is revised for updated cash balances in various funds. PREPARED BY: 3.3 Packet Pg. 38 REVIEWED BY: Attachments: 1. 3.3.a Treasurer Statement-July 2020 (Revised) 2. 3.3.b Investment Portfolio-July 2020 3. 3.3.c Treasurer Statement-August 2020 4. 3.3.d Investment Portolio-August 2020 3.3 Packet Pg. 39 3.3.a Packet Pg. 40 3.3.a Packet Pg. 41 3.3.b Packet Pg. 42 3.3.b Packet Pg. 43 3.3.b Packet Pg. 44 3.3.b Packet Pg. 45 3.3.b Packet Pg. 46 3.3.c Packet Pg. 47 3.3.c Packet Pg. 48 3.3.d Packet Pg. 49 3.3.d Packet Pg. 50 3.3.d Packet Pg. 51 3.3.d Packet Pg. 52 Agenda #: 3.4 Meeting Date: February 16, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Daniel Fox, City Manager TITLE: BLACK HISTORY MONTH PROCLAMATION. STRATEGIC GOAL: Safe, Sustainable & Healthy Community RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Proclamation declaring February as Black History Month. BACKGROUND: Black History Month is an annual celebration in February which recognizes and celebrates the significant contributions that African-Americans have made to American history. Historian and author Dr. Carter G. Woodson founded what has now become National Black History Month in 1926, to remember and celebrate African American history. Black History Month has been recognized by every U.S. President since 1976 when Gerald Ford issued the first African-American History Month Proclamation, urging Americans to “honor the too-often neglected accomplishments of Black Americans in every area of endeavor throughout our history.” The Association for the Study of African American Life and History has highlighted “The Black Family: Representation, Identity, and Diversity” as the theme for 2021 Black History Month. The City of Diamond Bar is proud to honor the achievements and accomplishments of Black Americans in our community, throughout our state, and nation. PREPARED BY: 3.4 Packet Pg. 53 REVIEWED BY: Attachments: 1. 3.4.a Black History Month Proclamation 3.4 Packet Pg. 54 PROCLAMATION “BLACK HISTORY MONTH” WHEREAS, the City of Diamond Bar recognizes and values diversity, equity, and inclusion within our community; and WHEREAS, Blacks and African Americans throughout the nation’s history have made countless indelible contributions in the fields of science, medicine, law, social justice, athletics, the arts, government, and more; and WHEREAS, since 1976, every U.S. president has officially designated the month of February as Black History Month to honor and affirm the importance of Black history throughout the American experience; and WHEREAS, Black History Month is an opportunity to remember, reflect on, and celebrate the important people and events who paved the way for equality and justice, to advance the civil rights of all Americans, and to battle racism for a more inclusive and just society; and WHEREAS, Black History Month calls on our collective need to recognize and combat racism, and to continue to build a community that embraces all ages, races, and religions; and, WHEREAS, Diamond Bar joins the country in honoring the achievements and accomplishments of Black Americans who have contributed to the progress of our nation, state and city; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar does hereby proclaim February 2021 as “BLACK HISTORY MONTH” and affirms its commitment to live up to the ideals of freedom, equity, justice and access for all. February 16, 2021 Nancy A. Lyons Mayor Ruth M. Low Andrew Chou Mayor Pro Tem Council Member Stan Liu Steve Tye Council Member Council Member 3.4.a Packet Pg. 55 Agenda #: 3.5 Meeting Date: February 16, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Daniel Fox, City Manager TITLE: EXONERATION OF SURETY BOND NO. 929638539 TO INSTALL MONUMENTATION FOR TRACT MAP 63623 (SOUTH POINTE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) STRATEGIC GOAL: Open, Engaged & Responsive Government RECOMMENDATION: Approve the exoneration of Surety Bond No. 929638539. FINANCIAL IMPACT: This action has no financial impact on the City. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: On June 1, 2007, in accordance with Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act, the City entered into Development Agreement No. 2005-01 (Agreement), with JCCL-South Pointe West, LLC, the original subdivider, to complete various improvements for Tract Map 63623. On October 21, 2015, the Agreement was assigned to Lennar Homes of California, Inc., the subdivider. The Agreement was amended on May 4, 2018, to make minor modifications. The subdivider guaranteed faithful performance of the Agreement by posting, with the City, surety bonds for rough grading & erosion control, private storm drain improvements, private street improvements, public street improvements, sewer improvements, a new public park, monumentation, and street lights. The subdivider submitted a written request dated November 9, 2020, for the exoneration of the bond posted for monumentation improvements (Attachment 1). While the entirety of all conditions of approval for the project ha ve not been met, as yet, City’s staff and our inspectors have verified and confirmed the work covered under the monumentation bond has been completed, and the corresponding bond meets the requirements to be recommended for exoneration. The table below provides a summary 3.5 Packet Pg. 56 of all active bonds related to the South Pointe Residential Development: Bond Bond # Original Amount Status Monumentation 929638539 $24,500 READY FOR EXONERATION Applicant's Land Surveyor has certified the installation of all monuments and accepted responsibility for their location and accuracy. In-Tract Sewer Improvements 24058527 $256,900 ACTIVE The public sewer within Larkstone Drive must be annexed into LA County's sewer maintenance district. The developer has submitted all required documentation. This process is under way and takes approximately 2 years. Storm Drain Improvements 24058529 $494,400 ACTIVE The public storm drain needs to be transferred to LA County. This process is underway with the County. Street Lights 72BSBHY8528 $69,245 ACTIVE The newly constructed street lights on Larkstone Drive must be annexed into LA County's Lighting Maintenance District. The developer has submitted all required documentation. This process is under way with the County and takes approximately 2 years. Therefore, it is recommended that City Council approve the exoneration of Surety Bond No. 929638539. PREPARED BY: 3.5 Packet Pg. 57 REVIEWED BY: Attachments: 1. 3.5.a Bond Release Request 3.5 Packet Pg. 58 •Street Lights •Monumentation Bond# 72BSBHY8528 Bond # 929638539 3.5.a Packet Pg. 59 Agenda #: 5.1 Meeting Date: February 16, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Daniel Fox, City Manager TITLE: DIAMOND BAR HOMELESSNESS RESPONSE PLAN. STRATEGIC GOAL: Safe, Sustainable & Healthy Community RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the Diamond Bar Homelessness Response Plan. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG) funded the development of the City of Diamond Bar’s Homelessness Response Plan (Plan). Should the Plan be approved, City staff will evaluate eligible fund ing opportunities and associated program requirements to determine what new programs and services could be considered, with any item being brought to the City Council for discussion and approval in advance of implementation. BACKGROUND: The San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG) was awarded State and Los Angeles County Measure H Innovation Funds to support housing and homelessness programs in the San Gabriel Valley. The SGVCOG initially paid for the development of Homelessness Response Plan s for over twenty of its member cities, with the second and final group consisting of the cities of Diamond Bar, Monterey Park, Rosemead, San Gabriel, and Temple City. Focus Strategies led a comprehensive effort to conduct internal and external stakeholder engagement, identified current resources and needs in each respective community, and developed key goals, supporting actions, and metrics for evaluating success. Diamond Bar’s Homeless Response Plan (Plan) seeks to both address the needs of those who are currently unsheltered and to implement strategies that can prevent an increase in incidents of homelessness within the City. The population of people experiencing homelessness within Diamond Bar has remained stead y around four to six 5.1 Packet Pg. 60 persons over the past several years as shown in Chart 1 below. Chart 1: Homeless Population in Diamond Bar While the population of homeless persons or those most at-risk of becoming homeless is relatively low, the City has been tasked with an increasing responsibility to both respond to homeless persons or encampments, but more importantly, provide services and a path to getting those experiencing homeless into the Continuum of Care . This growing responsibility, in tandem with ever growing responsibilities under State law, make it imperative that the City evaluate proactive measures to better assist people experiencing or at-risk of homelessness. ANALYSIS: The Homelessness Response Plan was developed over six-months from June to December 2020. Through a series of virtual stakeholder meetings, discussions with service providers and law enforcement personnel from the Diamond Bar/Walnut Station, two key challenges to preventing and responding to homelessness within Diamond Bar were identified: • Limited availability of local or regional homelessness response services and resources, particularly emergency and long-term housing resources, and a lack of clarity on how to navigate the complexity of the homelessness response system. • Insufficient supply of affordable housing to meet current and future resident needs. Plan Goals As a contract City, the Plan has identified a path forward that incorporates realistic goals that can be achieved should funding become available to implement the following: 1. Increase community awareness of homelessness, housing instability, and available response resources. 5.1 Packet Pg. 61 2. Advance property owner outreach and engagement strategies to encourage the maintenance and attainment of available, affordable units for people experiencing or at-risk of homelessness. 3. Promote affordable housing development and preservation within Diamond Bar. 4. Participate in ongoing regional and countywide strategies to foster a robust regional service delivery system to prevent and address homelessness. The Plan identifies a number of steps that the City can take to accomplish each of the four goals and their respective action items. While the Plan includes all four goals, the City can choose how to best meet the specific action items through a combination of staffing, cooperative agreements with nearby service organizations, as well as funding direct programs and services. The Plan goals are best achieved by implemented the four at minimum, and can always be expanded or modified in the future as new programs, services, and funding become available. Next Steps City operations are currently limited to administrative procedures responding to nuisance related complaints. There is a considerable deficiency in responding to the needs of people experiencing or at-risk of homelessness. The Plan therefore meets an immediate community need by enabling the City to do the following: 1. Secure Funding – With an approved plan, the City is eligible to apply for Measure H funding to respond to the needs of homeless and those at -risk of homelessness. 2. Increased Response Capabilities – An approved Plan enables the City to have a Council approved Policy document to ensure a consistent and hands -on approach to responding to the needs of individual people, as well as property owners. With additional resources, the City can entertain contracts with service providers or staff, to complement and support Sheriff’s Department efforts. PREPARED BY: 5.1 Packet Pg. 62 REVIEWED BY: Attachments: 1. 5.1.a City of Diamond Bar Homelessness Response Plan 5.1 Packet Pg. 63 HOMELESSNESS RESPONSE PLAN 2021 – 2023 5.1.a Packet Pg. 64 TABLE OF CONTENTS A. Plan Information 1 B. Pursuit of a City Plan to Address Homelessness 1 C. Planning Process 3 1. Information Gathering and Review 3 2. Key Findings 4 3. Plan Development 5 D. Homelessness Response Plan Goals 6 1. Increase Understanding of Homelessness and Housing Instability, as well as Available Response Resources. 7 2. Advance Strategies to Maximize Opportunities in Existing Rental Market to House People Experiencing or At-Risk of Homelessness. 10 3. Promote Affordable Housing Development and Preservation in Diamond Bar. 12 4. Participate in Ongoing Regional and Countywide Strategies to Develop a More Robust Regional Service Delivery System to Prevent and Address Homelessness. 14 E. Plan Implementation Lead 17 F. Participation In Collaborative Efforts 17 G. County Homeless Initiative Strategies 18 APPENDIX A. Participating Stakeholders 20 B. Los Angeles County Homeless Initiative – Approved Strategies 21 5.1.a Packet Pg. 65 City of Diamond Bar Homelessness Response Plan | 1 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR HOMELESSNESS RESPONSE PLAN A. Plan Information Period Covered by Plan: March 1, 2021 – December 31, 2023 Presented to City Council for Adoption: February 16, 2021 B. Pursuit of a City Plan to Address Homelessness The City of Diamond Bar developed this Homelessness Response Plan to guide its efforts to address the needs of people experiencing and at-risk of homelessness within the city. In addition to creating a map of the City’s current and future investments and involvement in homelessness response, the City’s seeks to align with Los Angeles County Homeless Initiative Strategies and Measure H funding requirements. This document lays out shared community goals and action steps to increase awareness of homelessness resources within the community, promote increased housing connections for people in need of affordable units, encourage affordable housing development and preservation, and further relationships with the regional and Los Angeles Countywide partners. The City of Diamond Bar is in the San Gabriel Valley of Los Angeles County, with a population of approximately 57,460 people comprising 18,163 households (an average of 3.2 persons per household). Of the residents in Diamond Bar, 54.6% identify as Asian; 19.6% as non-Hispanic white; 18.4% as Hispanic or Latino; 3.8% as Black or African American; and 3.6% as multi-racial or another race.1 At the time of the 2010 Census, almost a quarter (24%) of housing units in Diamond Bar were inhabited by people who are renting, and approximately 76% occupied by owners. 1 U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey; 2017. 5.1.a Packet Pg. 66 City of Diamond Bar Homelessness Response Plan | 2 The population of people experiencing homelessness within Diamond Bar has remained steadily around four to six people over the past several years, according to the Greater Los Angeles Point-in-Time Count. Of the people experiencing homelessness reflected in the Point-in-Time Count enumeration process, all were identified as sleeping on the streets or outdoors. While the city’s population of people experiencing homelessness does not appear to have risen as it has in Los Angeles County overall in recent years, Diamond Bar’s Homeless Response Plan seeks to both address the needs of those who are currently unsheltered and to implement strategies that can prevent an increase in incidents of homelessness within the jurisdiction. This Homelessness Response Plan was developed during the COVID-19 pandemic, and before the full impacts of the pandemic on housing stability in the region were known. As of this Plan’s approval, California State Assembly Bill 3088, the Tenant, Homeowner and Small Landlord Relief and Stabilization Act of 2020, continues to provide some protections for renters from eviction for nonpayment of rent and protection from no cause evictions.2 In Diamond Bar, as in many surrounding jurisdictions, there is concern among residents and people who work in the city that the pandemic may heighten housing insecurity and homelessness in the region. 2 AB3022 which took effect on August 31, 2020 requires tenants to meet certification requirements of the financial impact of COVID-19 on rent payment ability. Additionally, AB3022 requires that tenants pay at least 25% of the rent due during the period of September 1, 2020 through January 31, 2021. 6 5 4 4 4 0 10 20 30 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Number of People Experiencing Homelessness (Point-in-Time Count) 5.1.a Packet Pg. 67 City of Diamond Bar Homelessness Response Plan | 3 C. Planning Process In February 2020, the Governing Board of the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG) formalized funding to support regional cities in the development of homelessness response plans. The City of Diamond Bar elected to participate in this effort. In June 2020, the City began working with Focus Strategies3, the contracted consultant for the project, to strategize and engage in homelessness response planning efforts. 1. Information Gathering and Review This Plan was developed over a six-month period from June 2020 through December 2020. To inform the Plan, the City and Focus Strategies reviewed data on homelessness within Diamond Bar and the surrounding region, examined related City policies and planning documents (e.g., Consolidated Plan, Housing Element, etc.), and facilitated community input sessions. Throughout August and September 2020, interviews and input sessions were held with City staff members, County homelessness response system leaders, and non-profit and faith-based service providers4. These forums provided participants the opportunity to share views on the most pressing concerns related to homelessness in Diamond Bar, available resources, and opportunities for future efforts. The planning and input sessions explored topics such as: • What are the most urgent issues related to homelessness in Diamond Bar? • Are there trends you have noticed in the scope or needs of people experiencing homelessness within the city? • What current resources are available within the city to prevent or respond to homelessness, and what are the biggest gaps? 3 Focus Strategies is a national consulting firm, based on the West Coast, that specializes in strategic, data-informed solutions to homelessness. Through services that include homelessness response planning, system and program assessment, and equity analyses, Focus Strategies helps client communities develop housing-focused, person-centered strategies to reduce homelessness. 4 A list of agencies and programs represented through the stakeholder engagement process is included in Appendix A. 5.1.a Packet Pg. 68 City of Diamond Bar Homelessness Response Plan | 4 • What is working well, and what opportunities exist for strengthening current regional coordination or strategic planning efforts? • What short-term opportunities for policy, program, or system changes could yield a significant impact in improving outcomes for people experiencing or at-risk of homelessness, if implemented? 2. Key Findings Through its contract with the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department (Walnut/Diamond Bar Station), the City provides ancillary services for people experiencing homelessness. Law enforcement officers are the primary resource to respond to calls for mental or physical health crises, encampments, and quality of life issues for people experiencing homelessness. In addition, through its partnership with Los Angeles County’s Homeless Outreach Services Team (HOST), HOST members respond to calls related to encampments where at least five individuals are staying. In these instances, HOST members provide specialized outreach and coordinate with local resources such as behavioral health and homelessness response services to assist people in connecting with housing and social services. While recognizing the value and contribution of these teams, stakeholders also highlighted a need to enhance access to the homelessness response system. The Diamond Bar Homelessness Response Plan was developed to address the key areas of need identified through the information review and stakeholder engagement process. Two key challenges to preventing and responding to homelessness within Diamond Bar were identified: • There is a limited availability of local or regional homelessness response services and resources, particularly emergency and long-term housing resources, and a lack of clarity on how to navigate the complexity of the homelessness response system. • There is an insufficient supply of affordable housing to meet current and future resident needs. Additional context for these findings is summarized below. The themes informed the prioritization and development of goals and action steps for the City’s Homelessness Response Plan. 5.1.a Packet Pg. 69 City of Diamond Bar Homelessness Response Plan | 5 Lack of Available, Accessible Homelessness Response Services Although the number of people experiencing homelessness within Diamond Bar has remained consistently low over the past several years, a key challenge for people experiencing housing crises is the limited availability of emergency and long-term housing resources available in the city. In addition, many of the resources available in the San Gabriel Valley region and broader Los Angeles County are geographically distant from Diamond Bar. When coupled with a lack of public transportation within the city, this can present challenges for people attempting to access the shelters or services that are available. Stakeholders also remarked on the challenging nature of navigating the homelessness response system, due in large part to differing program protocol and eligibility criteria that can create confusion and impede efforts to help people secure the assistance they need. Without dedicated staffing or a specialized service provider within Diamond Bar to maintain linkages to regional resources and up-to-date information on program and system processes, attempts to connect people with services were experienced as being complicated and impacted by delays. Insufficient Supply of Affordable Housing The City of Diamond Bar has adopted multiple policies and ordinances that conserve and advance affordable housing efforts and that support the development of homelessness response resources in the community. These include affordable housing incentives and density bonus provisions to encourage the production of affordable housing, participation in the Los Angeles County Development Authority Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher rental assistance program, and accessory dwelling unit ordinances to increase the availability of lower cost rental housing. While these efforts support affordable housing development and preservation, local reports and stakeholder feedback indicate the cost of housing within Diamond Bar is out of reach for many households, particularly for seniors who may have lived in the city for some time who are transitioning to a fixed income. 3. Plan Development Based on findings from the information gathering and stakeholder engagement process, the City of Diamond Bar and Focus Strategies identified key goals for the City’s Homelessness Response Plan. To support the successful attainment of each goal, the City developed supporting actions, major tasks, metrics, and project leads for implementation of the Plan. In addition, the City also explored ways in which each goal may align with or enhance the impact of the Los Angeles 5.1.a Packet Pg. 70 City of Diamond Bar Homelessness Response Plan | 6 County Homeless Initiative’s Approved Strategies to Combat Homelessness.5 The priority goals and implementation elements of the Plan were introduced to Diamond Bar’s City Council for review and feedback in February 2021 and presented to the City Council for adoption on March 2, 2021. D. Homelessness Response Plan Goals The City of Diamond Bar has identified the following goals to respond to community concerns related to homelessness and align with broader regional system strategies and efforts: 1. Increase community awareness of homelessness, housing instability, and available response resources. 2. Advance property owner outreach and engagement strategies to encourage the maintenance and attainment of available, affordable units for people experiencing or at- risk of homelessness. 3. Promote affordable housing development and preservation within Diamond Bar. 4. Participate in ongoing regional and countywide strategies to foster a robust regional service delivery system to prevent and address homelessness. Below, an outline of key implementation strategies is included for each goal. This includes supporting actions, any related administrative or policy changes needed to achieve the goal, performance metrics, City resources that can be leveraged or are needed to support the goal, and major task plans for each supporting action. 5 In 2015, the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors launched the Homeless Initiative to create a coordinated, effective, stakeholder developed, response to the pervasive and increasing homelessness crisis in the region. The resulting set of strategies, organized in 6 key areas, form the basis of the Approved Strategies to Combat Homelessness. Los Angeles County Homeless Initiative’s Approved Strategies to Combat Homelessness may be found at: https://homeless.lacounty.gov/wp- content/uploads/2018/07/HI-Report-Approved2.pdf 5.1.a Packet Pg. 71 City of Diamond Bar Homelessness Response Plan | 7 1. Goal: Increase community awareness of homelessness, housing instability, and available response resources. 1.1. Supporting Actions Action 1: Develop and implement a communications strategy to inform residents, property owners, and the business community about homelessness, as well as strategies and resources to reduce incidents of homelessness. This may include but is not limited to the following activities: • Support the SGVCOG’s Regional Homeless Services Coordination Program efforts to develop and maintain a virtual “one-stop-shop” that municipal staff, members of the public, and other stakeholders can use to find resources and information about homelessness and homeless services in the San Gabriel Valley through leveraged program marketing and community outreach and engagement. • Update the City’s external communication portals (e.g., website) regarding homelessness and available local and regional resources. Options may include leveraging the United Way of Greater Los Angeles Everyone In community engagement initiative and/or the anticipated SGVCOG Regional Homeless Services Coordination Program’s online resource hub. • Explore partnerships with service providers who can co-facilitate community trainings and town halls or who can have tables at community events to share about homelessness and local response resources. Action 2: Promote the use of the Coordinated Entry System (CES) and other homelessness response services for people experiencing or at-risk of homelessness. This may include providing referrals to people seeking housing services who contact the City and/or publicizing referral information for CES Access Points in SPA 3 on the City’s website. Action 3: Increase connections between key personnel within City and local service providers, including the CES SPA 3 Lead Agencies, to help facilitate referral linkages for persons at-risk of or experiencing homelessness who contact the City. To facilitate this effort, City staff members may participate in regional homelessness response service coordination meetings convened by 5.1.a Packet Pg. 72 City of Diamond Bar Homelessness Response Plan | 8 the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA), CES SPA 3 Lead Agencies, and the SGVCOG. 1.2. Policy or Administrative Changes to Achieve Goal This goal does not require City of Diamond Bar policy or administrative changes. 1.3. Goal Measurement Metric 1: Completion and publication of communications materials about homelessness and available resources for residents, property owners, and the business community. • Data Sources: City department internal update • Timeline: 12 months from adoption of Homelessness Response Plan; with updates on an annual basis • Internal Progress Management Lead: City Manager's Office, in collaboration with Public Information and other City Departments Metric 2: Increased CES resource access by people with ties to Diamond Bar. • Data Sources: HMIS data reports available through LAHSA • Timeline: Progress towards this goal will be evaluated in alignment with the release of CES data reports by LAHSA (anticipated to be semi-annual) • Internal Progress Management Lead: City Manager's Office, in collaboration with the Directors of other City Departments 1.4. City Resources to Achieve Goal Staffing time will be needed for related activities including but not limited to: research on local resources and/or coordination with local service providers for assistance developing resource list; development of resource materials and/or trainings for residents on services available within region; participation in meetings hosted by LAHSA, CES SPA Lead Agencies, and the SGVCOG; preparation and delivery of reports on activities to City Council. Accomplishment of this goal will likely require use of City of Diamond Bar communication platforms, including the City’s website and/or newsletters. 5.1.a Packet Pg. 73 City of Diamond Bar Homelessness Response Plan | 9 1.5. Major Tasks The table below outlines the City’s major tasks to achieve Goal #1. The tasks may be adjusted when implementation is underway to respond to emerging opportunities or extenuating circumstances. GOAL #1: Launch a communications strategy to reduce stigma about homelessness and housing instability within the city and to increase awareness of available response resources. Action 1: Develop and implement a communications strategy to inform residents, property owners, and the business community about homelessness, as well as strategies and resources to reduce incidents of homelessness. Major Tasks Timeline Key Roles Decide upon key elements of communications strategy (e.g., website, town halls, etc.) including leverage of existing regional campaigns and resource hubs. 3 – 6 months from Plan adoption Lead: City Manager’s Office, in coordination with Public Information Department Determine if project deliverables will be designed internally or contracted. 6 – 9 months from Plan adoption Participate in meetings and communications with SGVCOG regarding implementation of the Regional Homeless Services Coordination Program Ongoing Draft or review communications strategy; Finalize and publicize developed materials. 1 year from Plan adoption Maintain and/or update resources on regular basis Ongoing Action 2: Promote the use of Coordinated Entry Systems and other homelessness response services for people experiencing or at-risk of homelessness. Major Tasks Timeline Key Roles Schedule meetings and/or maintain communications with SPA Lead Agencies to facilitate referral and coordination efforts. Ongoing Lead: City Manager’s Office Review LAHSA reports on CES assessments and services received by people with connections to Diamond Bar. Ongoing Action 3: Increase connections between key personnel within City and local service providers, including the CES SPA 3 Lead Agencies, to help facilitate referral linkages for persons at-risk of or experiencing homelessness who contact the City. 5.1.a Packet Pg. 74 City of Diamond Bar Homelessness Response Plan | 10 Major Tasks Timeline Key Roles Attend and participate in applicable regional homelessness response planning meetings, including those convened by SGVCOG, Homeless Initiative, and SPA 3 Lead Agencies. Ongoing Lead: City Manager’s Office 2. Goal: Advance strategies to maximize opportunities in existing rental market to house people experiencing or at-risk of homelessness. This goal ties to the following Los Angeles County Homeless Initiative Strategies: • A1/A5: Prevent Homelessness for Families and Individuals • B4: Facilitate Utilization of Federal Housing Subsidies 2.1. Supporting Actions Action 1: Continue to partner with the SGVCOG’s Landlord Outreach, Education, and Incentive program to further the work of the Los Angeles County Development Authority (LACDA) Housing Initiative Program and to encourage property owners to rent units to people with Housing Choice Vouchers and people receiving assistance through Rapid Re-Housing or other housing programs. This may include activities such as: • Identification of property owners within the city to outreach for Landlord Outreach, Education, and Incentive Program. • Coordination with CES SPA 3 Lead Agencies to host or support landlord engagement communications or workshops to increase awareness of regional landlord partnership initiatives. Action 2: Identify and secure funding to further Landlord Outreach, Education, and Incentive Program or similar efforts and foster program sustainability. 2.2. Policy or Administrative Changes to Achieve Goal This goal does not require City of Diamond Bar policy or administrative changes at this time. Expansion of the program through new funding (local, regional, or other) may have policy or administrative impacts: any identified change requests will be identified and brought to City Council as appropriate. 5.1.a Packet Pg. 75 City of Diamond Bar Homelessness Response Plan | 11 2.3. Goal Measurement Metric 1: Increased inventory of rental units within Diamond Bar in partnership with regional service providers to house people who have experienced or are at-risk of homelessness. • Data Sources: SGVCOG Landlord Outreach, Education, and Incentive Program data • Timeline: Progress towards this goal will be evaluated on an annual basis • Internal Progress Management Lead: City Manager's Office 2.4. City Resources to Achieve Goal Staffing time will be needed for related activities including but not limited to: supporting implementation and data collection of the City’s activities within the Landlord Outreach, Education, and Incentive Program; research of potential funding sources; and, if applicable, completion and submission of funding request applications or agreements. Accomplishment of this goal will also likely require use of City of Diamond Bar communication platforms, including the City’s website and/or newsletters. 2.5. Major Tasks The table below outlines the City’s major tasks to achieve Goal #2. These tasks may be adjusted when implementation is underway to respond to emerging opportunities or extenuating circumstances. GOAL #2: Advance strategies to maximize opportunities in existing rental market to house people experiencing or at-risk of homelessness. Supporting Action 1: Continue to partner with the SGVCOG Landlord Outreach, Education, and Incentive program and further the work of the LACDA Housing Initiative Program. Major Tasks Timeline Key Roles Identify property owners within Diamond Bar to contact regarding program partnership opportunities. Ongoing Leads: City Manager’s Office, Planning Division Coordinate with SGVCOG contracted agencies regarding marketing materials and communications strategies for contacting property owners. 3 – 6 months from Plan adoption Leads: City Manager’s Office, Public Information Department 5.1.a Packet Pg. 76 City of Diamond Bar Homelessness Response Plan | 12 Major Tasks Timeline Key Roles As applicable, publicize LACDA and SGVCOG communication messaging and material regarding program via City media channels and at City- sponsored events. 6 – 9 months from Plan adoption Leads: City Manager’s Office, Public Information Department In coordination with SGVCOG, evaluate outcomes of Landlord Outreach, Education, and Incentive Program efforts. 12 – 18 months from plan adoption Lead: City Manager’s Office Supporting Action 2: Identify funding to further Landlord Outreach, Education, and Incentive Program or similar efforts and foster program sustainability. Major Tasks Timeline Key Roles Evaluate funding and partnership opportunities offered through SGVCOG, other public/private funding streams, as well as City funds to identify potential sources of funding for program partnership sustainability. When appropriate opportunities arise, apply for and/or seek funding resources. Ongoing Lead: City Manager’s Office Provide updates to City Council regarding efforts and outcomes. Ongoing Lead: City Manager’s Office 3. Goal: Promote affordable housing development and preservation with Diamond Bar. This goal ties to the following Los Angeles County Homeless Initiative Strategies: • F1: Promote Regional SB 2 Compliance and Implementation • F4. Development of Accessory Dwelling Units Program • F5: Incentive Zoning/Value Capture Strategies • F7: Preserve and Promote the Development of Affordable Housing for Homeless Families and Individuals 3.1. Supporting Actions Action 1: Explore opportunities within Housing Element update to monitor and preserve existing affordable housing and to promote affordable housing development, particularly for very low income, extremely low income, and homeless households through activities such as: • Explore opportunities to encourage additional mixed-use developments or development agreements that include a minimum percentage of affordable units. 5.1.a Packet Pg. 77 City of Diamond Bar Homelessness Response Plan | 13 • Support compliance with SB 2 should a viable opportunity come forward from a developer. 6 Action 2: Explore opportunities to leverage the collaborative efforts of the San Gabriel Valley Regional Housing Trust (SGVRHT), of which the City of Diamond Bar is a member, to increase the stock of available affordable housing. 3.2. Policy or Administrative Changes to Achieve Goal Should policy or administrative changes be necessary to adopt strategies included within the Housing Element, they will be reviewed as part of the City’s Housing Element development process. In addition, any policy or administrative changes anticipated in relation to endeavors of the SGVRHT will be brought to City Council as appropriate. 3.3. Goal Measurement Metric 1: Inclusion of expanded or new strategies to preserve and promote affordable housing, particularly for very low income, extremely low income, and/or homeless households, within Housing Element update. • Data Sources: Housing Element update • Timeline: 12 months from adoption of Homelessness Response Plan • Internal Progress Management Lead: Planning Division, in coordination with City Manager’s Office 3.4. City Resources to Achieve Goal Staffing time will be needed for activities including but not limited to: the development of the Housing Element update; communications with potential development partners; and, if applicable, completion and submission of funding request applications and agreements for City- funded projects. Specific resources needed for implementation of Housing Element activities 6 SB 2 is enacted California state legislation that requires each city and County (for unincorporated areas) to: identify at least one zone where emergency shelters are permitted as a matter of right, and; treat transitional and supportive housing as a residential use of property, subject only to restrictions that apply to other residential dwellings of the same type in the same zone. 5.1.a Packet Pg. 78 City of Diamond Bar Homelessness Response Plan | 14 relevant to preventing or addressing homelessness will be identified through the Housing Element Update development process. 3.5. Major Tasks The table below outlines the City’s major tasks to achieve Goal #3. These tasks may be adjusted when implementation is underway to respond to emerging opportunities or extenuating circumstances. GOAL #3: Identify and pursue opportunities to promote affordable housing development and preservation with the city. Supporting Action 1: Explore opportunities within Housing Element update to monitor and preserve existing affordable housing and to promote affordable housing development, particularly for very low income, extremely low income, and homeless households. Major Tasks Timeline Key Roles As of the development of this Plan, the City’s Housing Element update process is underway via the project management of the Planning Division. As part of the process, the City will identify implementation strategies for the Housing Element update, including for those items that may be relevant to the City’s homelessness response efforts. Supporting Action 2: Commit to exploring opportunities to leverage the collaborative efforts of SGVRHT, of which the City of Diamond Bar is a member, to increase the stock of available affordable housing. Major Tasks Timeline Key Roles Attend and participate in SGVRHT meetings. Ongoing Lead: Planning Department Consider and research potential project opportunities to bring forward to SGVRHT. Ongoing Lead: Planning Department 4. Goal: Participate in ongoing regional and countywide strategies to develop a more robust regional service delivery system to prevent and address homelessness. 4.1. Supporting Actions Action 1: Participate in the SGVCOG Regional Homeless Services Coordination Program including but not limited to engaging in meetings with the SGVCOG’s contractor regarding strategies to increase coordination with and between local community groups and providers. 5.1.a Packet Pg. 79 City of Diamond Bar Homelessness Response Plan | 15 Action 2: Engage in efforts to share information, leverage resources, and develop a more robust regional service delivery system through participation in activities convened by LAHSA, CES Lead Agencies, homelessness response provider agencies, and neighboring jurisdictions. Action 3: Consider and, where appropriate, apply for funding opportunities for homelessness response efforts such as those that may become available through State, County, and local sources. Action 4: Continue to participate in Greater Los Angeles Homeless Count (Point-in-Time Count). 4.2. Policy or Administrative Changes to Achieve Goal This goal does not require City of Diamond Bar policy or administrative changes. New funding (local, regional, or other) and/or partnership opportunities may have policy or administrative impacts: potential impacts will be presented to City Council as appropriate. 4.3. Goal Measurement Metric 1: Increase in funding and/or programmatic resources to prevent and respond to homelessness within Diamond Bar, through direct City-funded efforts and/or community-based efforts serving Diamond Bar residents. • Data Sources: City Budget; SGVCOG Regional Homeless Services Coordination Program data • Timeline: This metric will be evaluated on an annual basis • Internal Progress Management Lead: City Manager's Office 4.4. City Resources to Achieve Goal Staffing time will be needed for related activities including but not limited to: planning for and participation in Greater Los Angeles Homeless Count; coordination with countywide and regional entities for data collection; participation in regional meetings including those convened by SGVCOG, CES SPA leadership, LAHSA, and the Los Angeles County Homeless Initiative; exploration and, if appropriate, pursuit of potential funding sources to enhance homelessness response efforts. 5.1.a Packet Pg. 80 City of Diamond Bar Homelessness Response Plan | 16 4.5. Major Tasks The table below outlines the City’s major tasks to achieve Goal #4. The tasks may be adjusted when implementation is underway to respond to emerging opportunities or extenuating circumstances. GOAL #4: Participate in ongoing regional and countywide strategies to develop a more robust regional service delivery system to prevent and address homelessness. Supporting Action 1: Participate in SGVCOG Regional Homeless Services Coordination Program including, but not limited to engaging in meetings with the SGVCOG’s contractor regarding strategies to increase coordination with and between local community groups and providers. Major Tasks Timeline Key Roles Participate in SGVCOG meetings related to housing and homelessness; maintain ongoing communications. Ongoing Lead: City Manager’s Office Present updates to City Council regarding pertinent Program efforts and outcomes. Ongoing Lead: City Manager’s Office, in coordination with other Departments Supporting Action 2: Engage in efforts to share information, leverage resources, and develop a more robust regional service delivery system through participation in activities convened by LAHSA, LACDA, CES leads, and neighboring jurisdictions. Major Tasks Timeline Key Roles Schedule or attend meetings with regional partners to establish formal communication channels for sharing information and resources. Maintain ongoing communications. Ongoing Lead: City Manager’s Office Incorporate initiatives and efforts into external communications strategies as appropriate. Ongoing Lead: City Manager’s Office, in coordination with other Departments Supporting Action 3: Consider and, where appropriate, apply for funding partnership opportunities for homelessness response efforts such as those that may become available through State, County, and local sources. Major Tasks Timeline Key Roles Evaluate funding and partnership opportunities to enhance local and regional homelessness response efforts. When appropriate opportunities arise, designate, apply for and/or seek funding resources. Ongoing Lead: City Manager’s Office, in coordination with other Departments 5.1.a Packet Pg. 81 City of Diamond Bar Homelessness Response Plan | 17 Supporting Action 4: Continue to participate in Greater Los Angeles Homeless Count. Major Tasks Timeline Key Roles Engage in Point-in-Time planning efforts facilitated by LAHSA, including coordination of the City’s internal supporting efforts and utilization of City communication platforms to outreach potential volunteers. Ongoing Leads: City Manager’s Office, in partnership with Public Safety, Public Information, and other Departments E. Plan Implementation Lead The primary contact for the City of Diamond Bar’s Homelessness Response Plan is Anthony Santos, Assistant to the City Manager. Name Anthony Santos Title Assistant to the City Manager Business Address 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Phone 909-839-7000 Email ASantos@DiamondBarCA.gov F. Participation in Collaborative Efforts As part of SPA 3 of the Los Angeles Continuum of Care, Diamond Bar connects residents to the Los Angeles CES structure through the lead agency for each CES population: Union Station Homeless Services (for adults and families) and Hathaway-Sycamores Child and Family Services (for youth). Volunteers of America operates CES Access Points in nearby Pomona and El Monte. Further, SPA 3’s outreach coordination network includes Multi-Disciplinary Teams, Homeless Engagement Teams, a Public Spaces Team, and a Department of Mental Health Homeless Services Team, all of whom have coverage areas that are inclusive of Diamond Bar7. While not physically located within Diamond Bar, these CES programs provide services to 7 The Multi-Disciplinary Teams include members with generalist outreach skills and specialties in mental health, substance use, peer, and/or medical services. The Homeless Engagement Teams include generalist outreach members staffed by Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA). The Public Spaces Teams includes generalists who provide outreach in parks, libraries, and transit stations. 5.1.a Packet Pg. 82 City of Diamond Bar Homelessness Response Plan | 18 people residing in Diamond Bar. Between July 1, 2019 and December 31, 2019, eight people who were staying in Diamond Bar were assessed through the CES process. Thirty-eight percent of the households assessed were individual adults and 50% were family units. One youth (13%) was also assessed. During the report period, three households with ties to Diamond Bar accessed interim or emergency housing and four received Rapid Re-Housing assistance.8 The City of Diamond Bar is also a member of the SGVCOG, which works to improve the quality of life for the more than 2 million residents residing in the San Gabriel Valley by focusing on issues such as those related to housing stability and homelessness. As noted in the Plan, Diamond Bar will be actively partnering with the SGVCOG to administer a new effort within the city: the Landlord Outreach, Education, and Incentive Program. The City of Diamond Bar will also continue to explore new opportunities through the SGVCOG, such as the upcoming Regional Homeless Services Coordination Program, to enhance services for residents of the city. Additionally, the City of Diamond Bar coordinates with countywide efforts to prevent and respond to homelessness, such as those convened through the Los Angeles County Homeless Initiative and LAHSA. G. County Homeless Initiative Strategies The following table summarizes the City of Diamond Bar’s current and planned areas of collaboration or alignment with the Los Angeles County Homeless Initiative Strategies. Plan to Participate Currently Participating County Homeless Initiative Strategies A. PREVENT HOMELESSNESS ☒ ☐ A1. Homeless Prevention for families ☒ ☐ A5. Homeless Prevention for Individuals B. SUBSIDIZE HOUSING ☐ ☐ B3. Partner with Cities to Expand Rapid Rehousing 8 Data from LAHSA’s Homelessness Statistics by City report; February 2020. 5.1.a Packet Pg. 83 City of Diamond Bar Homelessness Response Plan | 19 Plan to Participate Currently Participating County Homeless Initiative Strategies ☒ ☐ B4. Facilitate Utilization of Federal Housing Subsidies ☐ ☐ B6. Family Reunification Housing Subsidies ☐ ☐ B7. Interim/Bridge Housing for those Exiting Institutions ☐ ☐ B8. Housing Choice Vouchers for Permanent Supportive Housing C. INCREASE INCOME ☐ ☐ C1. Enhance the CalWORKs Subsidized Employment Program for Homeless Families ☐ ☐ C2. Increase Employment for Homeless Adults by Supporting Social Enterprise ☐ ☐ C4/5/6. Countywide Supplemental Security/Social Security Disability Income and Veterans Benefits Advocacy ☐ ☐ C7. Subsidize Employment for Homeless Adults D. PROVIDE CASE MANAGEMENT AND SERVICES ☐ ☐ D2. Jail In-Reach ☐ ☐ D5. Support for Homeless Case Managers ☐ ☐ D6. Criminal Record Clearing Project ☐ ☐ D7. Provide Services for Permanent Supportive Housing E. CREATE A COORDINATED SYSTEM ☐ ☐ E4. First Responders Training ☐ ☐ E5. Decriminalization Policy ☐ ☐ E6. Expand Countywide Outreach System ☐ ☐ E7. Strengthen the Coordinated Entry System (CES) ☐ ☐ E8. Enhance the Emergency Shelter System ☐ ☐ E10. Regional Coordination of Los Angeles County Housing Agencies ☐ ☐ E14. Enhance Services for Transition Age Youth F. INCREASE AFFORDABLE/HOMELESS HOUSING ☒ ☒ F1. Promote Regional SB2 Compliance and Implementation ☐ ☐ F2. Linkage Fee Nexus Study ☒ ☒ F4. Development of Second Dwelling Units Program ☒ ☒ F5. Incentive Zoning/Value Capture Strategies ☐ ☐ F6. Using Public Land for Homeless Housing ☒ ☒ F7. Preserve and Promote the Development of Affordable Housing for Homeless Families and Individuals ☐ ☐ F7. Housing Innovation Fund (One-time) 5.1.a Packet Pg. 84 City of Diamond Bar Homelessness Response Plan | 20 APPENDIX A. Participating Stakeholders The following agencies and departments provided insights and feedback regarding key concerns related to homelessness within Diamond Bar and the surrounding region. Participating Departments and Organizations City Manager’s Office, City of Diamond Bar Parks and Recreation, City of Diamond Bar Planning Division, City of Diamond Bar Hacienda Heights Field Office, Los Angeles County Supervisor Janice Hahn Homeless Initiative, Los Angeles County Chief Executive Office Sheriff’s Department, Los Angeles County St. Denis Church Union Station Homeless Station United Way of Greater Los Angeles 5.1.a Packet Pg. 85 City of Diamond Bar Homelessness Response Plan | 21 B. LA County Homeless Initiative: Approved Strategies Additional details on the strategies referenced in the City’s Homelessness Prevention and Response Plan are included in the table below. Strategy Brief Description9 A. Prevent Homelessness A1./A5. Homeless Prevention Program for Families and Individuals Develop an integrated, comprehensive homeless prevention program for families and individuals that draws on existing models and builds upon existing County homeless prevention funding sources. Prevention includes rental/housing subsidies, case management and employment services, and legal services. B. Subsidize Housing B4. Facilitate Utilization of Federal Housing Subsidies Encourage landlord acceptance of subsidized tenants with a Housing and Urban Development voucher issued by Los Angeles County Development Agency. E. Create a Coordinated System E6. Expand Countywide Outreach System Leverage current outreach efforts and create a countywide network of multidisciplinary, integrated street-based teams to identify, engage and connect, or re-connect, households experiencing homelessness to interim and/or permanent housing and supportive services. F. Increase Affordable/Homeless Housing F1. Promote Regional SB 2 Compliance and Implementation Promote compliance and/or implementation of SB 2 ordinances to identify at least one zone where emergency shelters are permitted as a matter of right and to treat transitional and supportive housing as a residential use of property. F4. Development of Second Dwelling Units Program Support the development of second units on single-family lots through the review process and provide technical assistance and incentives to homeowners in exchange for long-term affordability covenants or participation in Section 8 program. 9 Descriptions are excerpted or summarized from Approved Strategies to Combat Homelessness. 5.1.a Packet Pg. 86 City of Diamond Bar Homelessness Response Plan | 22 Strategy Brief Description F5. Incentive Zoning / Value Capture Strategies Implement various Incentive Zoning/Value Capture strategies (e.g., transportation infrastructure investments, zoning changes) for potential increases in land values and profit opportunities for private landowners, for the benefit of the public good. F7. Preserve and Promote the Development of Affordable Housing for Homeless Families and Individuals Promote the development and preservation of affordable housing for homeless families and individuals through efforts such as the Homeless Housing Development and Preservation program (through CDC) and the Housing Innovation Grant. 5.1.a Packet Pg. 87 Agenda #: 5.2 Meeting Date: February 16, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Daniel Fox, City Manager TITLE: DISSOLUTION OF LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 41. STRATEGIC GOAL: Responsible Stewardship of Public Resources RECOMMENDATION: Direct staff to take necessary steps to dissolve Landscaping Assessment District No. 41. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The outreach component of the dissolution process would include mailing out educational and informational materials to the property owners in the assessment district estimated to be about $3,000. There will also be ancillary staff costs associated with transitioning and transferring District-owned infrastructure to private property owners and HOAs, including irrigation and water services. Adequate funds are available in the Public Works Operating budget to cover these costs. BACKGROUND: The City of Diamond Bar (City) services and maintains over 12 acres of slopes, 3 acres of brush areas, and other landscape/irrigation improvements (Improvements) in Landscaping Assessment District No. 41 (District), which is bounded by Pathfinder Road to the north, Brea Canyon Cutoff Road to the south, and SR 57 to the east. It comprises 544 parcels, as shown in Attachment 1, with an annual assessment rate of $220.50 per parcel. District No. 41 was formed in 1985 by the County of Los Angeles prior to the City’s incorporation. The District formation made it possible for an assessment fee to be applied on the properties benefiting from the District under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code and Article XIIID of the California Constitution. Upon incorporation in 1989, the City assumed jurisdiction over the District. In 1996, approval of Proposition 218 (Prop 218) by California voters added Article XIIIC 5.2 Packet Pg. 88 and Article XIIID to State’s Constitution. The effect of Proposition 218 with respect to the District was that increases in assessment fees could no longer be approved by the City Council and instead, required approval by way of a majority protest procedure. Under that procedure, the assessment could not be increased unless a majority of the property owners voting on the assessment voted in favor of the increase. The City proposed such an increase in 2019, but it was overwhelm ingly rejected by property owners within the District. Due to the increase in the cost of the service over the years and the inability to increase assessments to cover those costs, the City has been subsidizing the maintenance of the Improvements in the District by using General Fund for over ten years. In the current FY 2020-21, the City’s General Fund was the source for about 55 percent of the budget allocated to the expenditures of the service in the District ($142,824 out of $264,981 total). To date, the City Council has provided direction and taken the following steps: March 7, 2019 Council LLAD Subcommittee Meeting (Councilmembers Nancy Lyons and Andrew Chou) Discussed financial condition, district maintenance and operating budget, various options, and next steps for District 41. The options discussed included dissolution of the District, Prop 218 election, reduction of service level, or continuing to subsidize at the existing level of service. April 16, 2019 City Council Meeting The City Council adopted a resolution to initiate the Prop 218 process with the goal that the property owners would support an increase in assessments. The discussion was focused on the Prop 218 process, plan, and schedule. July 16, 2019 City Council Meeting The City Council held a public hearing for District 41. Votes were counted. Those votes failed by significant margins. September 17, 2019 City Council Study Session With the results of the Prop 218 ballot, staff reviewed and discussed other options (i.e., reduced services, dissolve the districts, maintain status quo, etc.) and requested the City Council’s direction for both Districts 39 and 41. City Council provided direction to reduce service levels to operate Districts 39 and 41 within available resources, with a priority on City-owned assets and weed abatement for public safety. May 6, City Council LLAD The Subcommittee Reviewed the latest 5.2 Packet Pg. 89 2020 Subcommittee Meeting (Councilmembers Andrew Chou and Jennifer “Fred” Mahlke) maintenance proposals, budgets, and two main options (Maintain General Fund Subsidy or Dissolution of Districts 39 and 41). The Subcommittee agreed on dissolving the districts and to follow up with education and outreach, during the second half of Fiscal Year 2020-21. May 19, 2020 City Council Study Session As part of the Fiscal Year 2020-21 budget discussion, the City Council discussed the assessment districts. Additionally, in the City’s Fiscal Year 2021 -2024 Strategic Plan, Reduction of Subsidies in Districts 39 and 41 is listed as Key Initiative No. 1.1.2 for the Strategy of Securing Long Term Financial Responsibility under Strategic Goal No. 1, Responsible Stewardship of Public Resources. ANALYSIS: As a result of the failure of the property owners within District 41 to approve an increase in the assessment, the City has two other options to consider for District 41. They are as follows: 1. Dissolve District 41 and return the maintenance responsibilities to the property owners and the HOAs. 2. City continues maintenance of District 41 with a subsidy from the General Fund. The City has implemented and generally exhausted service reductions in an effort to maintain District property at a cost that is more aligned with the revenues received from the current assessment. Additional service reductions are not proposed as they would result in property maintenance not meeting minimal standards. A future mail-in ballot under Proposition 218 could be considered at a later date. Staff is proposing to take the necessary steps to dissolve Landscape District No. 41 with the intent to turn over all landscape maintenance responsibilities to the respective property owners no later than June 30, 2021. This will include an education and outreach program to inform the property owners of this decision . A draft sample letter to the property owners is provided in Attachment 2. Unlike proceedings to form the District or increases in assessments, dissolution of the District may be accomplished by the City Council after adoption of a resolution of intent and then a resolution formally dissolving the District. When complete, this would result in the current assessment of $220.50 per parcel being removed from future property tax rolls beginning with the next Fiscal Year of 2021-22. Once the District is dissolved, the City would not provide any services or maintenance in the District moving forward. Private property maintenance would become the responsibility of the underlying property owners who would be required to maintain the 5.2 Packet Pg. 90 property in accordance with City ordinances at a minimum. See attached accompanying map for more details of the maintenance areas in Attachment 1. Below is a tentative schedule for the dissolution process under Option 1: February 16, 2021 City Council directs staff to move forward with the District dissolution process. February 17 - April 6, 2021 City begins outreach program prior to the adoption of dissolution resolution. - Mail out initial notices to the property owners. A draft sample letter is attached (Attachment 2). - Update the District’s web page with dissolution process, timeline, expectation. - Create an e-subscription service for individuals interested in being notified by email or text message of any update related to the dissolution. March 16, 2021 City Council adopts a resolution to declare the City’s intention to dissolve the District. April 6, 2021 City Council adopts a resolution to dissolve the District. April 7 - June 30, 2021 City continues its outreach program after dissolving the District. - Expand on relevant content on the City’s website and social media pages on maintenance responsibilities, a new interactive map (GIS) with layers to show boundaries of the dissolved District, property boundaries, and brush clearance zones. - A dedicated online request form for property owners to request a virtual site visit by staff who can help them identify boundaries, vegetation maintenance, and pest control responsibilities on an as-needed basis. Should the City Council decide to continue maintenance of the District with General Fund subsidies, a tentative schedule of the annual update process under Option 2 is as follows: April 20, 2021 City Council adopts a resolution initiating the proceedings for Districts 38, 39, and 41 to maintain the current assessment May 18, 2021 City Council adopts a resolution to declare the City’s intention to levy and collect assessments for the District and to direct the City Clerk to advertise for a public hearing to be held on June 1, 2021. June 1, 2021 City Council adopts a resolution to levy assessments on the District. LEGAL REVIEW: 5.2 Packet Pg. 91 The City Attorney has reviewed and approved this item as to form. PREPARED BY: REVIEWED BY: Attachments: 1. 5.2.a Map - Landscaping Assessment District No. 41 2. 5.2.b Draft Sample Outreach Letter for LAD No. 41 Dissolution 5.2 Packet Pg. 92 Attachment 1 - MAP PUBLIC WORKS LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 41 SHEET 1 of 1 NTS  MAINTAINED AREAS (1) Turf Areas: 17,600 sq. ft Maintained Slope Areas: 12 ac. Brush Areas Handwork: 3 ac. Open Space Tractor Work: 25 ac. Open Space Goat Work: 71 ac. --------------------------------------------- Total Work Area: 111.5 ac. Total area to be maintained by the City after dissolution of the district: 0.0 ac. (2) (1) All areas are approximate. (2) All work areas to be maintained by HOA after dissolution of the District. 5.2.a Packet Pg. 93 Nancy A. Lyons Ruth M. Low Andrew Chou Stan Liu Steve Tye Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Council Member Council Member Council Member City of Diamond Bar I 21810 Copley Drive Diamond Bar CA 91765-4178 www.DiamondBarCA.gov I (909) 839-7000 {date} {Name} {Address 1} {Address 2} {City}, {State} {Zip} RE:INTENT TO DISSOLVE LANDSCAPE DISTRICT 41 Dear Property Owner (Landscape District 41): In 2019, the City of Diamond Bar notified all 554 parcel/property owners within Landscape District 41 of insufficient funding to continue maintaining the grass, shrubs, groundcover, trees and fire brush clearance within the District (see attached map). This was followed by an informational mailer and a community meeting to provide additional information about the funding deficit and a proposed increase in annual property tax assessments to make it solvent again. In keeping with the legal requirements of Proposition 218 (Article XIII.D of the California Constitution) the City held an election by mail-in ballot in July 2019 that asked property owners whether or not to approve an increase in assessments to bring revenues in line with on -going maintenance costs. The proposed assessment failed by a vote of 135 (74.6%) opposed to 46 (25.4%) in favor out of a total 181 weighted votes that were cast by property owners within the District. As you may know, District 41 was formed in the mid -1980’s by the original developer and the County of Los Angeles with the intent that the maintenance costs would be self-sustaining. The current property tax assessment is $220.50 per parcel was established at the District’s formation and has never been increased. Upon cityhood in 1989, Diamond Bar assuming the maintenance 5.2.b Packet Pg. 94 Intent to Dissolve Landscape District 41 {date} Page 2 role from the County. For many years now, the District has operated at a deficit to cover even the most basic level of services such as fire brush clearance, weed and pest control, and irrigation. Currently the City subsidizes approximately 54% of the annual maintenance costs. In short, the City can no longer provide landscape services on private property at these highly subsidized levels. As a result, the City intends to dissolve Landscape District 41 and return landscape maintenance responsibilities back to the respective property owners. Over the next few months, City Staff will being taking the necessary steps to dissolve Landscape District 41 with the intent to turn over all landscape maintenance responsibilities no later than June 30, 2021. When complete, this will allow for the current assessments of $220.50 per parcel to be removed from future property tax rolls beginning with the next 2021/2022 fiscal year. Thank you in advance for your prompt attention and cooperation as we work to make the transition as smooth as possible. Additional information and updates will be provided on the City’s website at __________. Should you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact ______ at ________. Sincerely, Daniel Fox City Manager Attachment: Landscape District 41 Map 5.2.b Packet Pg. 95 Agenda #: 5.3 Meeting Date: February 16, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Daniel Fox, City Manager TITLE: DISSOLUTION OF LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 39. STRATEGIC GOAL: Responsible Stewardship of Public Resources RECOMMENDATION: Direct staff to take the necessary steps to dissolve Landscaping Assessment District No. 39. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The outreach component of the dissolution process would include mailing out educational and informational materials to the property owners in the assessment district estimated to be about $6,000. There will also be ancillary staff costs associated with transitioning and transferring District-owned infrastructure to private property owners, including irrigation and water services. Adequate funds are available in the Public Works Operating Budget to cover these costs. BACKGROUND: The City of Diamond Bar (City) services and maintains five (5) mini-parks, 15 acres of slopes, 39 acres of open space areas, and other landscape/irrigation improvements (Improvements) in Landscaping Assessment District No. 39 (District), which is bound on the west by Diamond Bar Boulevard and on the east by City limits. It comprises 1,249 parcels, as shown in Attachment 1, with an annual assessment rate of $236 per parcel. District No. 39 was formed in 1985 by the County of Los Angeles prior to the City’s incorporation. The District formation made it possible for an assessment fee to be applied on the properties benefiting from the District under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code and Article XIIID of the California Constitution. Upon incorporation in 1989, the City assumed jurisdiction over the District. In 1996, approval of Proposition 218 (Prop 218) by California voters added Article XIIIC 5.3 Packet Pg. 96 and Article XIIID to State’s Constitution. The effect of Proposition 218 with respect to the District was that increases in assessment fees could no longer be approved by the City Council and instead, required approval by way of a major ity protest procedure. Under that procedure, the assessment could not be increased unless a majority of the property owners voting on the assessment voted in favor of the increase. The City proposed such an increase in 2019, but it was overwhelmingly rejected by property owners within the District. Due to the increase in the cost of the service over the years and the inability to increase assessments to cover those costs, the City has been subsidizing the maintenance of the Improvements in the District by using the General Fund for over ten years. In the current FY 2020-21, the City’s General Fund is the source for over 20 percent of the budget allocated to the expenditures of the service in the District ($80,984 out of $375,748 total). To date, the City Council has provided direction and taken the following steps: March 7, 2019 Council LLAD Subcommittee Meeting (Councilmembers Nancy Lyons and Andrew Chou) Discussed financial condition, district maintenance and operating budget, various options, and next steps for District 41. The options discussed included the dissolution of the District, Prop 218 election, reduction of service level, or continuing to subsidize at the existing level of service. April 16, 2019 City Council Meeting The City Council adopted a resolution to initiate the Prop 218 process with the goal that the property owners would support an increase in assessments. The discussion was focused on the Prop 218 process, plan, and schedule. August 6, 2019 City Council Meeting The City Council held a public hearing for District 39. Votes were counted. Those votes failed by significant margins. September 17, 2019 City Council Study Session With the results of the Prop 218 ballot, staff reviewed and discussed other options (i.e., reduced services, dissolve the districts, maintain status quo, etc.) and requested the City Council’s direction for both Districts 39 and 41. City Council provided direction to reduce service levels to operate Districts 39 and 41 within available resources, with a priority on City-owned assets and weed abatement for public safety. May 6, 2020 City Council LLAD Subcommittee Meeting The Subcommittee reviewed the latest maintenance proposals, budgets, and two 5.3 Packet Pg. 97 (Councilmembers Andrew Chou and Jennifer “Fred” Mahlke) main options (Maintain General Fund Subsidy or Dissolution of Districts 39 and 41). The Subcommittee agreed on dissolving the districts and to follow up with education and outreach during the second half of Fiscal Year 2020-21. May 19, 2020 City Council Study Session As part of the Fiscal Year 2020-21 budget discussion, the City Council discussed the assessment districts. Additionally, in the City’s Fiscal Year 2021-24 Strategic Plan, Reduction of Subsidies in Districts 39 and 41 is listed as Key Initiative No. 1.1.2 for the Strategy of Securing Long Term Financial Responsibility under Strategic Goal No. 1, Responsible Stewardship of Public Resources. ANALYSIS: As a result of the failure of the property owners within District 39 to approve an increase in the assessment, the City has two other options to consider for District 39. They are as follows: 1. Dissolve District 39 and return the maintenance responsibilities to the property owners. Under this scenario, the City would be required to fund the maintenance of the five (5) public mini-parks and trails within District 39 from other City funds, primarily the General Fund. 2. City continues maintenance of District 39 with a subsidy from the General Fund. The City has implemented and generally exhaust ed service reductions in an effort to maintain District property at a cost that is more aligned with the revenues received from the current assessment. Additional service reductions are not proposed as they would result in property maintenance not meeting minimal standards. A future mail-in ballot under Proposition 218 could be considered at a later date. Staff is proposing to take the necessary steps to dissolve Landscape District No. 39 with the intent to turn over all landscape maintenance responsibilit ies to the respective property owners no later than June 30, 2021. This will include an education and outreach program to inform the property owners of this decision. A sample draft letter to the property owners is provided in Attachment 2. Unlike proceedings to form the District or increases in assessments, dissolution of the District may be accomplished by the City Council after adoption of a resolution of intent and then a resolution formally dissolving the District. When complete, this would result in the current assessment of $236 per parcel being removed from future property tax rolls beginning with the next Fiscal Year of 2021-22. Once the District is dissolved, the City would not provide any services or maintenance in the District moving forward, with the exception of City-owned public trails and the 5.3 Packet Pg. 98 five (5) mini-parks. Private property maintenance would become the responsibility of the underlying property owners who would be required to maintain the property in accordance with City ordinances at a minimum. See attached accompanying map for more details of the maintenance areas in Attachment 1. Below is a tentative schedule for the dissolution process under Option 1: February 16, 2021 City Council directs staff to move forward with the District dissolution process. February 17 - April 6, 2021 City begins outreach program prior to the adoption of dissolution resolution. - Mail out initial notices to the property owners. A draft sample letter is attached (Attachment 2). - Update the District’s web page with dissolution process, timeline, expectation. - Create an e-subscription service for individuals interested in being notified by email or text message of any update related to the dissolution. March 16, 2021 City Council adopts a resolution to declare the City’s intention to dissolve the District. April 6, 2021 City Council adopts a resolution to dissolve the District. April 7 - June 30, 2021 City continues its outreach program after dissolving the District. - Expand on relevant content on the City’s website and social media pages on maintenance responsibilities, a new interactive map (GIS) with layers to show boundaries of the dissolved District, property boundaries, and brush clearance zones. - A dedicated online request form for property owners to request a virtual site visit by staff who can help them identify boundaries, vegetation maintenance, and pest control responsibilities on an as-needed basis. Should the City Council decide to continue maintenance of the District with General Fund subsidies, a tentative schedule of the annual update process under Option 2 is as follows: April 20, 2021 City Council adopts a resolution initiating the proceedings for Districts 38, 39, and 41 to maintain the current assessment. May 18, 2021 City Council adopts a resolution to declare the City’s intention to levy and collect assessments for the District and to direct the City Clerk to advertise for a public hearing to be held on June 1, 2021. June 1, 2021 City Council adopts a resolution to levy assessments on the District. 5.3 Packet Pg. 99 LEGAL REVIEW: The City Attorney has reviewed and approved this item as to form. PREPARED BY: REVIEWED BY: Attachments: 1. 5.3.a Map - Landscaping Assessment District No. 39 2. 5.3.b Draft Sample Outreach Letter for LAD No. 39 Dissolution 5.3 Packet Pg. 100 Attachment 1 - MAP PUBLIC WORKS LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 39 SHEET 1 of 1 NTS  MAINTAINED AREAS (1) Five (5) Mini-Parks: 6.95 ac. (2) Maintained Slope Areas: 14.67 ac. (3) Brush Areas: 38.73 ac. (3) Open Space Tractor Work: 14 ac. (4) ------------------------------------------------- Total Work Area: 74.35 ac. Total Area to stay with the City after dissolution: 17.95 ac. (1) All areas are approximate. (2) To be maintained by the City after dissolution of the District. (3) To be maintained by HOA or private owner after dissolution of the District. (4) 11 ac. of the area to be maintained by the City and 3 ac. by HOA or private owner after dissolution of the District. 5.3.a Packet Pg. 101 Nancy A. Lyons Ruth M. Low Andrew Chou Stan Liu Steve Tye Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Council Member Council Member Council Member City of Diamond Bar I 21810 Copley Drive Diamond Bar CA 91765-4178 www.DiamondBarCA.gov I (909) 839-7000 {date} {Name} {Address 1} {Address 2} {City}, {State} {Zip} RE:INTENT TO DISSOLVE LANDSCAPE DISTRICT 39 Dear Property Owner (Landscape District 39): In 2019, the City of Diamond Bar notified all 1,249 parcel/property owners within Landscape District 39 of insufficient funding to continue maintaining the grass, shrubs, groundcover, trees and fire brush clearance within the District (see attached map). This was followed by an informational mailer and a community meeting to provide additional information about the funding deficit and a proposed increase in annual property tax assessments to make it solvent again. In keeping with the legal requirements of Proposition 218 (Article XIII.D of the California Constitution) the City held an election by mail-in ballot in July 2019 that asked property owners whether or not to approve an increase in assessments to bring revenues in line with on -going maintenance costs. The proposed assessment failed by a vote of 378 (78.6%) opposed to 103 (21.4%) in favor out of a total 481 weighted votes that were cast by property owners within the District. As you may know, District 39 was formed in the mid -1980’s by the original developer and the County of Los Angeles with the intent that the maintenance costs would be self-sustaining. The current property tax assessment is $236 per parcel was established at the District’s formation and has never been increased. Upon cityhood in 1989, Diamond Bar assuming the maintenance 5.3.b Packet Pg. 102 Intent to Dissolve Landscape District 41 {date} Page 2 role from the County. For many years now, the District has operated at a deficit to cover even the most basic level of services such as fire brush clearance, weed and pest control, and irrigation. Currently the City subsidizes over 20% of the annual maintenance costs. In short, the City can no longer provide landscape services on private property at these highly subsidized levels. As a result, the City intends to dissolve Landscape District 39 and return landscape maintenance responsibilities back to the respective property owners. Over the next few months, City Staff will be taking the necessary steps to dissolve Landscape District 39 with the intent to turn over all landscape maintenance responsibilities no later than June 30, 2021. When complete, this will allow for the current assessments of $236 per parcel to be removed from future property tax rolls beginning with the next 2021/2022 fiscal year. Thank you in advance for your prompt attention and cooperation as we work to make the transition as smooth as possible. Additional information and updates will be provided on the City’s website at __________. Should you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact ______ at ________. Sincerely, Daniel Fox City Manager Attachment: Landscape District 39 Map 5.3.b Packet Pg. 103 Agenda #: 5.4 Meeting Date: February 16, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Daniel Fox, City Manager TITLE: FISCAL YEAR 2020/2021 MID-YEAR BUDGET REVIEW. STRATEGIC GOAL: Responsible Stewardship of Public Resources RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 2021-05 amending the Fiscal Year 2020/2021 Municipal Budget revenue estimates and appropriations. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The Fiscal Year (FY) 2020/2021 Mid-Year budget review proposes an overall decrease in estimated resources of $699,443 for all funds, and an overall decrease in appropriations of $1,446,555 for all funds. This results in an estimated increase in the General Fund balance of $35,377 and an overall savings in all funds by $747,112. The proposed revisions to the revenue and appropriations estimates are incl uded in the attached Resolution; Exhibit A (Attachment 2), and are discussed throughout the report as summarized below: Fund Resources Appropriations General Fund <$619,146> <$689,063> Special Revenue & Internal Services Funds <$119,926> <$797,121> Capital improvement Projects $39,629 $39,629 Total <$699,443> <$1,446,555> BACKGROUND: The City Council adopted Resolution No. 2020 -17 on June 16, 2020 approving the FY 20/21 Municipal Budget. The City Council has approved additional appropriations and carry-over requests from FY 19/20 on October 6, 2020 and as they have occurred throughout the year. It is City policy for staff and the City Council to periodically review 5.4 Packet Pg. 104 the annual budget and make any additional adjustments as deemed necessary. St aff has completed its mid-year review of the FY 20/21 budget performance, revenue and expenditure trends, and Capital Improvement Project status. Based on that review, a Resolution amending the FY 20/21 City Budget is proposed for City Council consideration. ANALYSIS: At the time of the adoption of the FY 2020/2021 budget, the Country was in the middle of a global pandemic which brought extreme financial uncertainty to the local economy. Staff made financial projections based on assumptions that were unprecedented. We have now reached the half-way point in the fiscal year and further adjustments are necessary in order to reflect the current state of the economy. Notable adjustments to General Fund revenue include better than anticipated sales tax revenue which will be adjusted upward by $500,000. Building permit activity is higher than anticipated by $125,970. Unfortunately, with the pandemic continuing longer than originally projected, other revenue sources will need to be adjusted downward. The se revenue sources include decreases in Transient Occupancy Tax (<$356,250>), parking and vehicle fines (<$125,625>), Parks & Recreation fee programs (<$347,500>) and Diamond Bar Center and Field & Facility rental revenue (<$589,500>). There will also be reductions in General Fund expenditures due to suspended programs and services. Parks & Recreation expenditures are being reduced by $810,808. Increases to General Fund expenditures are due mainly to reduced salary charges to special revenue funds and therefore increased salary costs to the General Fund. The City’s current adjusted General Fund Budget for FY 20/21 shows anticipated resources of $26,839,553. It is recommended that the resource estimate be decreased by $619,146 to $26,220,407. The current approved General Fund appropriations budget totals $26,139,582. It is recommended that this budget be decreased by $689,063 to $25,450,519. In addition, the use of fund balance reserves is being increased by $34,540. This increase is due to an increase in the subsidy to the Lighting and Landscape Assessment Districts related to water usage. The recommended changes in the estimated resources and appropriations will result in an increase to the estimated General Fund reserve balance by $35,377 to $22,305,239 at the end of the fiscal year. 5.4 Packet Pg. 105 Current Budget Amendment Adjusted Budget Resources Annual Revenue $25,186,122 ($653,686)$24,532,436 Use of Fund Balance Reserve 1,653,431 34,540 1,687,971 Total Resources $26,839,553 ($619,146)$26,220,407 Total Appropriations 26,139,582 (689,063)25,450,519 Impact to Fund Balance $699,971 $69,917 $769,888 Unreserved Fund Balance @ Beg of FY $23,223,322 $23,223,322 Less Uses of Unreserved Fund Bal (1,653,431)(34,540)(1,687,971) Estimated Unreserved Fund Bal @ End of FY $22,269,862 $35,377 $22,305,239 General Fund Revenues: In preparation for the mid-year budget review, staff examined the City’s revenue sources to ensure valid revenue estimates based on current trends and activi ties. Below is a summary of proposed changes to the General Fund revenue estimates. Revenue Source Amount Description Other Taxes $212,500 Increase based on actual collections to date in Sales Tax revenue ($500,000), Property Transfer Tax ($68,750) offset by a reduction in Transient Occupancy Tax (<$356,250>). State Subventions $70,484 Increased based on actual collections for Property Tax In Lieu of VLF Fines and Forfeitures <$125,625> Decrease based on lower Vehicle Code Fines (<$45,000>) and Parking Fines (<$80,625>). Current Service Charges <$76,530> Decrease based on additional Building Permit Revenue ($125,970), Engineering Fees ($138,000), Industrial Waste Fees ($7,000) offset by a reduction in Parks & Recreation fee programs (<$347,500>). Use of Money & Property <$672,390> Decrease based on a decrease in facility rental activity at the DBC (<$555,000>), Field & Facility rentals (<$34,500>) and lower investment earnings (<$82,890>). Cost Reimbursements <$62,125> Cost Reimbursement from Calvary Chapel for Sheriff’s Dept. services. Use of General Fund Reserves $34,540 Increase in anticipated need for GF subsidies to the LLAD’s ($34,540). Total $619,146 5.4 Packet Pg. 106 General Fund Appropriations: When the budget was adopted in June 2020 the General Fund appropriations totaled $25,811,159 which included the use of Fund Balance reserves ($532,731) for Capital Improvement Projects and the subsidy to the Lighting and Landscape Districts and Emergency Contingency Funding ($850,000). Prior to these proposed mid-year budget amendments, the City Council had authorized FY 19/20 carryovers and additional appropriations in the amount of $328,423 for a total of $26,139,582. The following are the highlights of the proposed changes in the General Fund appropriations: Department Amount Description City Council <$9,000> Voluntary reduction of car allowance for an additional six months. City Manager $3,210 Increase in GF Salary & Benefits ($33,100) due to lower Prop A & Prop C charges, decrease in Part Time Salaries (<$7,390>) due to lower costs for interns, a decrease in printing costs (<$900>), an increase in publication costs for public hearing advertisements ($900), and a decrease in the cost of renting AQMD facilities for Council meetings (<$22,500>). Finance $52,800 Increase in GF Salary & Benefits due to lower Transit/Prop A activity. Information Systems $19,125 Increase in GF Salary & Benefits ($7,325) due to lower Prop A & Prop C charges and increased computer maintenance costs ($14,600). Public Safety <$158,875> Decrease due to lower Special Events activity (<$62,125>) and Crossing Guard costs (<$96,750>). Community Development - Planning <$15,000> Salary savings for Associate Planner. Community Development – Building & Safety $81,170 Increase in Part Time Salaries ($5,250) and Contract Services ($75,920) which is based on increased building permit activity (RKA costs). This is offset by an increase in building permit revenue. Parks & Recreation – Diamond Bar Center <$418,550> Lower Salaries & Overtime (<$324,850>), Operating Supplies (<$6,700>), Printing (<$12,000>), Electric Utility Costs (<$30,000>) and Security (<$45,000>). Parks & Recreation – Recreation <$392,258> Lower Salaries & Overtime (<$179,446>), Operating Supplies (<$37,600>), Printing (<$4,362>), Rental/Lease of Property (<$33,900>), Special Events (<$44,950>) 5.4 Packet Pg. 107 and Contract Class instructor costs (<$92,000>). Public Works – Administration $48,910 Increase in GF Salary & Benefits ($41,910) due to lower Prop A & Prop C charges and an increase in Contract Services – Industrial Waste ($7,000). Public Works – Engineering 19,465 Increase in GF Salary & Benefits ($22,465) due to lower Prop A & Prop C charges offset by a decrease in Professional Services – Traffic (<$3,000>). Public Works – Civic Center $2,000 Increase in Gateway Center association fees ($2,000) and Water Utility costs ($5,000) offset by a decrease in Gas Utility costs (<$5,000>) Public Works – Parks & Facilities $40,000 Increase in Water Utility costs due to lack of rain. Public Works – Road Maintenance $3,000 Increase in Contract Services – Traffic Signals Transfers Out $34,940 General Fund subsidy to LLAD #39 and #41 are increased ($34,540) and an increase in the transfer to the Debt Service Fund ($400) Total <$689,063> Special Revenue and Internal Service Funds: The following table summarizes the proposed changes in revenue and expenditures for the Special Revenue and Internal Service Funds. Fund Revenue Expenditure Description COVID-19 Fund $31,142 Increase to FEMA revenue due to actual receipt ($31,142). Measure W Fund $29,702 <$34,500> Increase to Measure W revenue estimates($29,702). Decrease to Salary & Benefits charges (<$34,500>). Road Maintenance & Rehabilitation Act (RMRA) Fund $42,709 Increase to RMRA revenue estimates ($37,909) and investment income ($4,800). Measure R Fund <$2,000> Decrease to investment income. 5.4 Packet Pg. 108 Gas Tax <$26,861> Decrease to Gas Tax revenue estimates (<$25,361>) and investment income (<$1,500>) Proposition A <$550,000> <$799,350> Decrease to Transit Pass Sales (<$550,000>). Decrease to Salary & Benefits (<$58,800>), Contract Services – Senior Programs (<$30,550>), Transit Fares (<$550,000>) and Transit Subsidy (<$160,000>). Proposition C <$1,500> <81,500> Decrease to investment income (<$1,500>) Decrease to Salary & Benefits (<$81,500>) MTA Grant Fund $320,852 Appropriation of unearned revenue from FY 19/20 ($320,852). CDBG Fund $17,090 $3,823 Appropriation of unearned revenue from FY 19/20 ($17,090). Transfer Out – CIP Fund for final invoices on Area 1 ADA Curb Ramp project ($3,823). LLAD #38 $18,000 Increase in water utility costs ($18,000). LLAD #39 $15,000 $15,000 Increase in Transfer In – General Fund ($15,000) and increase in water utility costs ($15,000). LLAD #41 $19,540 Increase in Transfer In – General Fund ($19,540) for costs previously carried over and appropriated. Traffic Mitigation Fund <$11,000> Decrease to investment income Sewer Mitigation Fund <$900> Decrease to investment income Integrated Waste Management Fund <$4,400> Reduction in promotional supplies (<$1,200>) and Professional Services (<$3,200>). Quimby Fund <$2,000> $16,819 Decrease to investment income (<$2,000>) 5.4 Packet Pg. 109 Transfer Out – CIP Fund for Canyon Loop Trail ($16,819). Park Development Fund <$500> $18,987 Decrease to investment income (<$500>). Transfer Out – CIP Fund for Canyon Loop Trail ($18,987) Prop A – Safe Parks <$600> Decrease to investment income. PEG Fees Fund $1,000 Increase to investment income. Debt Service Fund $0 Decrease to investment income (<$400>) and increase in Transfer In – General Fund ($400) Building Facility & Maintenance Fund <$1,600> $50,000 Reduction in investment income (<$1,600>) Increase in appropriations for Indoor Air Quality Project. Total <$119,926> <$797,121> Capital Improvement Fund The revenue (transfers in) and appropriations in this fund have been increased by $39,629. The related projects are listed below: Project Revenue Expenditure Description Area 1 – ADA Curb Ramp Project (#SI19100) $3,823 $3,823 Appropriation for payment of final project invoices Canyon Loop Trail Design (#FP17500) $35,806 $35,806 Appropriation of different funding sources due to grant funds and Measure W funds unavailable for design costs. Total $39,629 $39,629 PREPARED BY: 5.4 Packet Pg. 110 REVIEWED BY: Attachments: 1. 5.4.a Resolution No. 2021-05 2. 5.4.b Exhibit A - Fund Balance 5.4 Packet Pg. 111 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-05 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2020/2021 MUNICIPAL BUDGET WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2020-17 approving and adopting a budget for the City of Diamond Bar for the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 2020 and ending June 30, 2021 including maintenance and operations, special funds and capital improvements and appropriating funds for accounts departments, divisions, object and purposes therein set forth (herein referred to as the "Budget"); and WHEREAS, the City Council may choose to amen d the Budget from time to time throughout the fiscal year; and WHEREAS, an Amendment to the Budget has been presented to the City Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: Section 1. The City Council hereby approves amendments to the FY 20-21 Municipal Budget as set forth in the attached Exhibit A. Section 2. There are hereby appropriated for obligations and expenditures by the City Manager the amounts shown on the attached Exhibit A. All obligations and expenditures shall be incurred and made in the manner provided by the provisions of State law and City ordinances and resolutions applicable to purchasing and contracting. PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 16th day of February, 2021. _________________________ Nancy A. Lyons, Mayor 5.4.a Packet Pg. 112 Resolution No. 2021-05 2 ATTEST: I, Kristina Santana, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, adopted and approved at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the 16th day of February, 2021, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ______________________________ Kristina Santana, City Clerk 5.4.a Packet Pg. 113 Exhibit A Fund #Fund Title FB Reserves @ 06/30/20 Revenues Transfers In Mid-Year Adj Mid-Year Transfers In Total Resources Expenses Transfers Out Mid-Year Adj Mid-Year Transfers Out Total Uses FB Reserves @ 06/30/21 100 General Fund 23,223,322 23,857,594 1,328,528 (653,686) 47,755,758 23,657,153 2,482,429 (724,003) 34,940 25,450,519 22,305,239 101 Com Organization Support Fund - 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 - 102 Law Enforcement Reserve Fund 1,045,106 - - 1,045,106 161,874 161,874 883,232 103 General Plan Revision Fund 90,528 - 90,528 75,364 75,364 15,164 104 Technology Reserve Fund 158,817 53,885 212,702 - 212,702 105 OPEB Reserve Fund 158,618 - 158,618 20,000 88,000 108,000 50,618 106 COVID-19 Recovery Fund - 705,972 31,142 737,114 705,972 705,972 31,142 201 Measure W Local Return Fund - 800,000 29,702 829,702 262,579 (34,500) 228,079 601,623 202 Road Maintenance & Rehab (RMRA)2,036,555 1,007,146 42,709 3,086,410 2,076,811 2,076,811 1,009,599 203 Measure M Fund 761,185 861,928 1,623,113 380,019 380,019 1,243,094 204 Measure R Fund 139,637 757,485 (2,000) 895,122 45,000 45,000 850,122 205 Gas Tax Fund 12,742 1,351,727 (26,861) 1,337,608 1,036,000 1,036,000 301,608 206 Prop A - Transit Fund 878,599 1,971,364 (550,000) 2,299,963 2,386,052 53,500 (799,350) 1,640,202 659,761 207 Prop C - Transit Fund 1,200,843 1,020,709 (1,500) 2,220,052 554,694 346,185 (81,500) 819,379 1,400,673 208 MAP-21 Fund 363 - 363 - 363 209 SB821 Trails (TDA)- 117,713 117,713 100,787 100,787 16,926 210 MTA Grants Fund (320,852) - 320,852 (0) - (0) 225 Community Dev Block Grant Fd (13,267) 470,152 17,090 473,975 470,152 3,823 473,975 - 226 CASP (SB1186) Fund 21,666 8,200 29,866 - 29,866 238 Landscape Maint Dist - 38 36,672 276,330 208,923 521,925 485,253 18,000 503,253 18,672 239 Landscape Maint Dist - 39 - 294,764 80,984 15,000 390,748 375,748 15,000 390,748 - 241 Landscape Maint Dist - 41 - 122,157 142,824 19,540 284,521 284,521 284,521 - 245 Street Beautification 333,060 3,800 336,860 - 336,860 246 Traffic Mitigation Fund 7,185,552 941,910 (11,000) 8,116,462 40,000 40,000 8,076,462 247 Sewer Mitigation Fund 52,664 1,500 (900) 53,264 - 53,264 248 Tres Hermanos Fund 53,125 38,000 91,125 71,000 71,000 20,125 250 Integrated Waste Mgt Fund 1,367,069 588,737 1,955,806 516,204 10,000 (4,400) 521,804 1,434,002 251 Air Quality Improvement Fd 146,703 76,000 222,703 96,000 24,930 120,930 101,773 252 Waste Hauler Fund 34,229 141,300 175,529 - 175,529 253 Used Oil Grant 31,743 15,735 47,478 15,500 15,500 31,978 254 Beverage Recycling Grant 70,526 15,070 85,596 14,300 14,300 71,296 255 Local Roadway Safety Program - 72,000 72,000 72,000 72,000 - 256 Hazard Mitigation Grant Fund - 45,000 15,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 - 260 Park Fees (Quimby) Fd 124,493 3,500 (2,000) 125,993 56,875 16,819 73,694 52,299 261 Meas A - Neighborhood Park Measure - 231,000 231,000 - 231,000 262 Park & Facility Development Fd 18,987 700 41,835 (500) 61,022 18,987 18,987 42,035 263 Prop A - Safe Neighborhood Pks Fd 3,858 600 (600) 3,858 - 3,858 270 PEG Fees Fund 448,636 104,000 1,000 553,636 55,000 55,000 498,636 280 Citizens Option for Public Sfty Fd 337,996 103,800 441,796 10,000 120,654 130,654 311,142 281 CA Law Enforcement Eq Fund 8,070 100 8,170 8,126 8,126 44 301 Capital Improvement Project Fd (17,228) 192,205 3,357,329 39,629 3,571,935 3,549,534 39,629 3,589,163 (17,228) 401 Debt Service Fund 19 400 867,006 (400) 400 867,425 867,406 867,406 19 501 Self Insurance Fund 1,002,894 7,500 504,500 1,514,894 512,000 512,000 1,002,894 502 Vehicle Maint & Replacement Fund 272,616 3,500 172,150 448,266 296,028 296,028 152,238 503 Equipment Maint & Repl Fd 1,586,295 15,000 91,150 1,692,445 858,345 858,345 834,100 504 Building Facility & Maint Fund 288,473 46,835 241,835 (1,600) 575,543 211,800 175,000 50,000 436,800 138,743 601 OPEB Trust Fund 455,794 15,100 88,000 558,894 - 558,894 Grand Totals 43,236,106 36,302,418 7,198,064 (808,552) 74,569 86,002,605 36,510,731 7,198,064 (1,521,124) 74,569 42,262,240 43,740,365 City of Diamond Bar Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Budget Resources Uses 5.4.b Packet Pg. 114 1 Kristina Santana From:Allen J. Wilson <allenw2001@yahoo.com> Sent:Wednesday, February 10, 2021 8:34 AM To:Kristina Santana Cc:Allen Wilson; Dan Fox Subject:February 16, 2021 - City Council Meeting Public Comments CAUTION: This message originated outside of our City of Diamond Bar network.  Kristina: I am requesting that my public comments be read at the February 16, 2021 City Council Meeting: It has been almost a year that the city council had telephonic meetings. It is getting old which is discriminatory against the disabled community especially the deaf and hard of hearing for accessibility of an interpreter. You owe the community to return to the AQMD Auditorium which is large enough to accommodate six foot social distancing and the dais is large enough for the five councilmembers for the public to see deliberations of municipal business and not hide behind a telephone. The AQMD auditorium has the technical resources for the public to see each of you via cameras which has been used long before the pandemic has started. Recently, the Voice of OC published an article regarding Placentia-Yorba Linda USD parents pleading the board to switch from telephone to zoom meetings. To quote from one parent who told the trustees during public comments: “My mom’s knitting club in Laguna woods, where the average age is 75.6 years, has somehow found the IT chops to meet on Zoom once a week so the inability of this board to broadcast its meetings especially during a pandemic is concerning." Therefore, let that quote sink in because our municipal government budget of $30M surely can find resources to return to the AQMD Auditorium safely. If front line workers at our local grocery stores, food services and other essential services can perform their essential jobs then surely this council can do the same because as an elected official your job should be essential enough to advocate for transparent visible government meetings for the public. Regards, Allen Wilson 2 Diamond Bar Resident The Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified School District is Not Video Broadcasting Meetings, so Parents Are     The Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified School District is Not Video Broadcast... As pressure to live stream board of education meetings continues, the trustees could take up the topic at their ...     To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.   1 Kristina Santana From:Andrew Zhang <zhang.andrew992@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, February 10, 2021 12:24 PM To:Kristina Santana Subject:Hero Pay for Grocery Workers CAUTION: This message originated outside of our City of Diamond Bar network.  Dear council members,     My name is Andrew Zhang and I am a Diamond Bar resident. As you probably know, the ongoing COVID‐19 pandemic  has put the health and safety of many at risk. In particular, grocery store employees find themselves working long hours  in indoor settings full of people‐‐conditions that can serve as a breeding ground for virus as evidenced by the many cases  of COVID‐19 linked to grocery stores. On top of that, the pandemic has created all kinds of economic hardships that  disproportionately impact the working class. In this time of suffering and danger, grocery workers deserve better than  empty words of performative acknowledgement while the essential nature of grocery shopping means that grocery  stores are seeing record profits. It is imperative that we deliver for the people that deliver for us, which is why I ask that  the city council follow in the steps of cities like Irvine and Los Angeles in implementing a Hero Pay  ordinance. https://voiceofoc.org/2021/02/irvine‐becomes‐first‐city‐in‐orange‐county‐to‐approve‐hero‐pay‐for‐grocery‐ workers/     There is no doubt that this is an issue that should be placed on the council's agenda. Thank you for your consideration.    Sincerely,  Andrew Zhang  To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. ᐧ  1 Kristina Santana From:Adrienne Cotterell <alcqa@verizon.net> Sent:Wednesday, February 10, 2021 10:21 PM To:Kristina Santana Subject:FOR PUBLIC COMMENT CAUTION: This message originated outside of our City of Diamond Bar network.  Comments to be read at the February 16, 2021 City Council Meeting. Thank you.  I completely support the health and safety of our City Council Members, the City Manager, and staff and understand  why City Council meetings are not held in person due to the pandemic.  What I don't understand is why the City Council  is not using Zoom or other comparable system to hold meetings.   Other cities are using it successfully.  Zoom has taken steps to address meeting security issues. Zoom has features that  allow the meeting to be accessible to hearing impaired residents such as third party captioning and to sight impaired  with various screen controls.  Many of us have been doing business on Zoom or Microsoft Teams or WebEx Meetings or Google Hangout Meets for  almost a year. Why can't our City Council get it together to use one of these?  It would also be good to continue access  for the public on Zoom or other system in the future, as there are many residents with mobility issues who would  benefit from accessing City meetings using these tools.  Thank you.  Adrienne Cotterell   Diamond Bar Resident  1 Kristina Santana From:Raphael Hildan Plunkett <raphaelplunkett@aol.com> Sent:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 11:20 AM To:Kristina Santana Subject:comment 2-16-21 CAUTION: This message originated outside of our City of Diamond Bar network.  This is Raphael Plunkett and I’m sorry I won’t be able to virtually attend tonight’s meeting.  I would like to add these  comments please...     First, I’d like to thank Council‐member Chou for the request to recognize Black History Month in Diamond Bar.  I thank  the Council as a whole for the long overdue recognition.  I’ll watch for future events, and I offer my assistance with any  Black History Month planning and presentation for the future.    Second, on our last City Council meeting call, I was surprised to hear conversation about a digital billboard proposal,  requesting an exemption.    As a member of the International Dark‐Sky Association, I ask that you not contribute to light pollution and reject this  exemption request.  Light pollution generated by digital signs has been shown to affect humans and wildlife.  Humans  need dark skies to maintain healthy circadian rhythms, and glare from nighttime lighting can create hazards ranging  from eye discomfort to visual disability.  Wildlife can be harmed by too much artificial light affecting their hunting,  sleeping and migrating patterns.  Light pollution wastes energy and money.  All of this artificial light affects our ability to  view the night skies.  It is troubling that many children today will grow up without ever having experienced a naturally  dark sky.  Please reject this proposal and keep our entire area digital billboard free.  More information about IDA , their  work and membership can be found at www.darksky.org.  I invite my neighbors to look for ways to participate in the  upcoming International Dark Sky Week, April 5‐12, 2021.    Be well ‐ Raphael