The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About04/22/1997am MCI lill APRIL 22, 1997 7:00 P.M. South Coast Air Quality Management Auditorium 21865 East Copley Drive Diamond Bar, California Chairman Vice Chairman Conmi&ioner Commissioner Commissioner District Joe Ruzicka Dion Schad Franklin Fong Mike Goldenberg Joe McManus Copies of staff reports or other written documentation relating to agenda items are on file in the Community Development Office, located at 21660 E. Copley Drive, Suite 190, and are available for public inspection. If you have questions regarding an agenda item, please call (909) 396 5676 during regular business hours In an effort to comply with the requirements of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the City of Diamond Bar requires that any person in need of any type of special equipment, assistance or accomodation(s) in order to communicate at a City public meeting must inform the Community Development Department at (909) 396-5676 a minimum of 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting. P\A&LWAGffiIDAZED Please refrain from smoking, eating or drinking in the Auditorium The City of Diamond Bar uses recycled paper and encourages you to do the same. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA Tuesday, Aprff 22, 1997 Next Resolution No. 97-6 CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: 1. ROLL CALL: COMMISSIONERS: Chairman Joe Ruzicka, Vice Chairman Don Schad, Mike Goldenberg, Franklin Fong, and Joe McManus 2. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is the time and place for the general public to address the members of the Planning Commission on any item that is within their jurisdiction, allowing the public an opportunity to speak on non-public hearing and non -agenda items. Please complete a Speaker's Card for the recording Secretary (Completion of this form is voluntary. There is a five minute maximum time limit when addressing the Planning Commission. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following items listed on the consent calendar are considered routine and are approved by a single motion. Consent calendar items may be removed from the agenda by request of the Commission only: 3.1 Minutes of April 8, 1997 4. OLD BUSINESS: None 5. NEW BUSINESS: 6. PUBLIC HEARING: 6.1 Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9 (pursuant to Code Section 22.20.100) is a request for the co -location of a telecommunications facility by two service providers on a residential property and a request for an amendment to Tract Map 42584, removing a restriction from said map prohibiting vehicular ingress and egress to Armitos Place. Continued from March 25, 1997. Project Address: 24401 Darrin Dr. (northwest comer Darrin Dr. & Armitos Pl.) Applicants: Cox California PCS, Inc. 18200 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92612 and Pacific Bell Mobile Services, 5959 1 W. Century Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90015 Property Owners: Eric and Robin Stone, 24401 Darrin Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit No. 96-10 and Development Review No. 96-9, Findings of Fact and conditions as listed within the attached resolution. 7. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: 8. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 9. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION - April 24, 1997 - 7:00 p.m., AQMD Board Hearing Room, 21865 E. Copley Drive. TOWN HALL MEETING - May 3, 1997 - AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Drive Topic: Draft Redevelopment,Plan for the Diamond Bar Economic Revitalization Area. CITY COUNCIL - May 6, 1997 - 6:30 p.m., AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Drive TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION - May 8, 1997 - 7:00 p.m., AQMD Board Hearing Room, 21865 E. Copley Drive. 10. ADJOURNMENT: Tuesday, May 13, 1997 2 MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION,, APRIL 8, 1997 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Ruzicka called the meeting to order at 7:11 p.m. at the South Coast Air Quality Management Auditorium, 21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance was led by C/Fong. ROLL CALL: Present: Chairman Ruzicka, Vice Chairman Schad, and Commissioners, Fong, and Goldenberg. Also Present: Community Development Director James DeStefano, Senior Planner Catherine Johnson, and Assistant Planner Ann Lungu. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS - None CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Minutes of March 25, 1997. VC/Schad made a motion, seconded by C/Goldenberg, to approve the minutes of March 25, 1997 as amended. The motion was approved 4-0 with C/McManus being absent. PUBLIC HEARING: 1. Conditional Use Permit 94-4(1) is a request for an extension of time (pursuant to Code section 22.56.140), of this project's original approval, dated March 13, 1995. The original approval permitted development of a 23.8 acre park site known as Pantera Park. The park is located east of Pantera Drive and south of Bowcreek at 700-800 Pantera Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765. Applicant/ City of Diamond Bar, 21660 E. Copley Property Owner: Drive, Suite 100, Diamond Bar, 91765 CDD/DeStefano presented the staff report. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the extension of time for Conditional Use Permit No. 94-4 (1) , Findings of Fact, and conditions as listed within the resolution. Chair/Ruzicka opened the public hearing. Albert Perez, 703 Pantera Drive, asked if the proposed tot lot and lighting are included in the current plan. APRIL 8, 1997 PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION CDD/DeStefano indicated the proposed tot lot on the park plans. He indicated that the tot lot is included as originally approved. He reiterated that there is no lighting planned for the first phase construction. However, as a result of the Planning Commission's approval, conduit will be installed for possible lighting during a future construction phase. Lola Perez, 703 Pantera Drive, asked what may cause further construction delays and why the extension cannot be for a shorter period of time than one year. CDD/DeStefano again explained the proposed construction schedule. Further delays are not anticipated. However, a one year extension is the maximum time permitted by Code and is requested to insure adequate time to begin construction. Jaime Ocampo, 752 Bow Creek Drive, said he is concerned about privacy, noise level and safety between the park and his property. _ CDD/DeStefano stated this area has been set aside for the park project since prior to City incorporation. It is designed to be an active park and may present some increase in noise levels during daylight hours. The park will be available for the use and enjoyment of its adjacent residents. A permanent chain link fence is proposed for the Bow Creek Drive property line. Hassan Sotuda, 754 View Lane, stated his concerns regarding recent changes in environmental, traffic, lighting, air pollution, and parking issues. He objected to a park in his neighborhood. Keith Mathews, 526 Dole Court, asked how the City plans to stop motorcyclists from using park area hillsides. CDD/DeStefano stated a portion of the property is owned by a private party. The portion owned by the City of Diamond Bar has been fenced. He asked the residents to report trespassers to the Sheriff's Department. Kathryn Fox, 927 Pantera Drive, said she is concerned about increased traffic and related parking concerns. CDD/DeStefano stated the adjacent public streets contain sufficient width to accommodate increased traffic. The park includes 135 on -site parking spaces and two ingress/egress driveways which are deemed sufficient to accommodate the infrastructure. APRIL 81 1997 PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION Chair/Ruzicka closed the public hearing. CDD/DeStefano stated there issues related to this park. constructed on the existing construction is proposed. District water tank service Sunriver Drive and Eastgate are no new environmental The park is proposed to be 15 flat acres. No hillside The Walnut Valley Water gated road is accessed from Drive. C/Goldenberg stated that the proposed park was the subject of a series of public hearings held over a period of about one year. The Parks and Recreation Commission responded to the concerns of the surrounding residents. originally, a community center was proposed for the site. As a result of the neighborhood traffic conditions, the facility was excluded. C/Goldenberg moved, C/Fong seconded, to approve the extension of time for Conditional Use Permit No. 94-4 (1) , Findings of Fact, and conditions as listed within the resolution. The motion was approved 4-0 with C/McManus being absent. 2. Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Redevelopment Plan for the Economic Revitalization Area (DEIR). Patrick Mann, Cotton/Beland/Associates, Inc. explained the components and conclusions of the Draft Environmental Impact Report. Chair/Ruzicka opened the public hearing. Seeing no one present who wished to speak on this item, Chair/Ruzicka closed the public hearing. CDD/DeStefano reminded the public that additional comments will be accepted by the Diamond Bar Redevelopment Agency through April 25,'1997. OLD BUSINESS: NEW BIISINESS: 1. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DETERMINING CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN AND RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DIAMOND BAR ECONOMIC REVITALIZATION AREA. CDD/DeStefano presented the staff report. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution determining consistency with the General Plan APRIL 8, 1997 PAGE 4 PLANNING COMMISSION and recommending adoption of the Redevelopment Plan for the Diamond Bar Economic Revitalization Area. Felise Acosta and Hitta Mosesman, Rosenow Spevacek Group Inc., presented an overview of the Redevelopment Plan and how it relates to the City's and Agency's goals to revitalize the proposed project area. The Planning Commission is being asked to find conformity with the City's General Plan and to recommend that the Redevelopment Agency and City Council approve the Redevelopment Plan for the Diamond Bar Economic Revitalization area. Ms. Acosta responded to C/Goldenberg that impaired investment is a redevelopment law term that classifies economic blight. The term is generally applied to properties that are excessively vacant, suffer declining values and are not` worth economic improvement due to investment factors that render the property non - economical. The agency powers must conform to the City's General Plan. The information compiled by Economic Research Associates consulting group is a vital component of the reports before the Planning Commission for consideration. Ms. Acosta explained to VC/Schad that community redevelopment law requires that in order for an agency to collect any tax increment revenue, it must have incurred debt. The agency must have debt on its books that is at least equal to the increment collected in any given year. Many agencies incur debt by having the city loan it money. Agencies initially incur debt through the process of adopting a project area. Annually, on October 1, each agency within California must file a Statement of Indebtedness with the County Auditor Controller in order to receive the tax increment check. The debt limit, required by law, is based upon analysis of the greatest potential annual percentage of projected debt. The debt limit is an arbitrary legal limit which sets the maximum amount of debt allowed at any one time during the 45 year plan. A city may not issue debt that it cannot support. Responding to Chair/Ruzicka, Ms. Acosta confirmed that $220,000,000 is the projected tax increment net revenue anticipated during the 45 year plan. The agency may not exceed $60,000,000 in total debt at any one time. Once the plan is adopted, the only way the debt limit can be changed is by an amendment to the Redevelopment Plan. Assembly Bill 1290 requires an amendment to the redevelopment plan which involves a lengthy public hearing process similar to the current ongoing adoption plan process. APRIL 8, 1997 PAGE 5 PLANNING COMMISSION Ms. Acosta responded to Chair/Ruzicka that the debt of a redevelopment agency is not the debt of the city. This information is fully disclosed in statement viewed by potential bond purchasers. The investor assumes earthquake risk when it purchases California G.O. Bonds or Department of Water and Power Energy Revenue Bonds. VC/Schad asked if a redevelopment agency can play a role in open space preservation. Ms. Acosta cited Goal No. 9 of the redevelopment agency plan. As long as the agency had the resources available and it met the needs of the redevelopment plan, the preservation of open spaces could be considered by the agency. Responding to C/Fong, Ms. Acosta stated redevelopment agencies do not have power to tax. The agency receives the increase in taxes that are generated by increases in values. When property values increase as a result of revitalization, the related property tax increase is returned to the redevelopment agency. Ms. Acosta stated that over the past three years, Diamond Bar residential property values have continued to increase while industrial and commercial values have decreased. Chair/Ruzicka opened the public hearing. Seeing no one present who wished to speak on this item, Chair/Ruzicka closed the public hearing. CDD/DeStefano pointed out the list of properties slated for revitalization was amended by the City Council and staff. He presented the revised Resolution. Responding to C/Fong, ACA Susskind recommended Item B. RESOLUTIONS: 3 be reworded as follows: "The Planning Commission hereby recommends approval of the Redevelopment Plan for the Diamond . Bar Economic Revitalization Area. In the event that, prior to the adoption of the Redevelopment Plan, the Agency or City Council desires to clarify or refine the list of proposed public improvements referred to in the Plan, or to make other minor technical or clarifying changes to the Redevelopment Plan, the Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that any such changes need not be referred to it for further report and recommendation." Without objection, the Commission concurred with the recommended change. APRIL 8, 1997 PAGE 6 PLANNING COMMISSION VC/Schad moved, C/Fong seconded, to adopt the amended Resolution determining consistency with the General Plan and recommending adoption of the Redevelopment Plan for the Diamond Bar Economic Revitalization Area. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS - None INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: CDD/DeStefano stated the list of Planning Commission Goals & Objectives and projects for the 1997-1998 fiscal year will be provided to the Commission at its April 22, 1997 meeting. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: C/Goldenberg reminded the Commission that the City's 8th Anniversary Celebration will be held on Sunday, April 20, 1997 at Peterson Park from 12:00 noon to 5:00 p.m. On April 26 and 27, 1997, the E1 Toro Marine Airbase will conduct its final air show. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to come before the Planning Commission, VC/Schad moved, C/Fong seconded, to adjourn the meeting. Chair/Ruzicka-adjourned the meeting at 9:07 to April 22, 1997. Respectfully Submitted, James DeStefano Community Development Director Attest: Joe Ruzicka Chairman City of Diamond Bar PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 6.1 REPORT DATE: April 16, 1997 MEETING DATE: April 22, 1997 CASE/FILE NUMBER: Conditional Use Permit No. 96-10 Development Review No. 96-9 APPLICATION REQUEST: A request for the co -location of a telecommunications facility by two service providers on a residential property and a request for an amendment to Tract Map 42584, removing a restriction from said map prohibiting vehicular ingress and egress to Armitos Place. PROPERTY LOCATION: 24401 Darrin Drive APPLICANTS: Cox California PCS, Inc. 2381 Morse Avenue Irvine, CA 92714 Pacific Bell Mobile Services 5959 W. Century Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90045 PROPERTY OWNERS: Eric and Robin Stone 24401 Darrin Drive Diamond Bar CA 91765 1 LIIiI1AIAFAX AIJt The applicant is proposing the construction of an unmanned wireless telecommunications facility by two service providers. This use is conditionally permitted within the Single Family Residential (R-1) zone. The proposed antennas and equipment cabinets will be located on the sloped area of the subject property, below street level, facing away from the residences. The facility will not be visible from the surrounding residential neighborhood and will be screened from the view of freeway travelers. The project will not generate significant additional traffic, create noise or light, or impair views. The facility is required to comply with federal regulations regarding radio frequency emissions. Staff therefore recommends approval of the proposed telecommunications facility. BACKGROUND/HISTORY: The property owners, Eric and Robin Stone, and the applicants, Cox California PCS, and Pacific Bell Mobile Services (PBMS) are requesting approval of Conditional Use Permit #96-10 and Development Review #96-9 This request involves the placement of three antennas and equipment cabinets to be placed on the sloped portion of a residentially zoned parcel. This project also includes a request for an amendment to Tract Map 42584, removing a restriction from said map prohibiting vehicular ingress and egress to Armitos Place. This project was originally scheduled for the January 28, 1997 Planning Commission meeting. Notification was sent to all property owners within a 500' radius of the subject site pursuant to the Planning and Zoning Code notification requirements for conditional use permits. Because the project included a request to remove a restriction from a tract map, the City Attorney advised staff, that in addition to the customary notice, notice to all property owners within he boundaries of the tract map and within a 500` radius of the exterior boundary of the tract would be required. Based on this 'determination, the project was renoticed and scheduled for the February 25, 1997 Planning Commission meeting. At that time the applicant was proposing the telecommunications facility on a barn to be located on the site's flat pad area fronting on Armitos Place. 2 Staff had specific concerns regarding the size and aesthetics of the barn. It was determined that the barn would be incompatible with the architecture of the homes in the surrounding neighborhood. There were also concerns that the barn may have partially blocked the views of the residents on the other side of. Armitos Place. As a result, the applicant requested continuance of this project to allow time to prepare and submit an alternative design addressing these concerns. The Planning -Commission granted a continuance to the meeting of March 25, 1997. At this meeting the applicant requested additional time to finalize the project design and prepare plans. The Planning Commission granted an additional continuance to the meeting of April 22, 1997. The site's General Plan designation is Low Density Residential (RL) and it is zoned Single Family Residential (R-1-10,000). The proposed use is conditionally permitted within this zone pursuant to the Planning and Zoning Code Section 22.20.100. The land uses surrounding the subject site include the Pomona Freeway (SR 60) to the north, and single family residential development to the south, east and west. The proposed facility will be part of a national wireless Personal Communication Services (PCS) telecommunication system by Cox California PCS, Inc. and Pacific Bell Mobile Services. Since the City's incorporation, eighteen (18) cell sites have, been approved within the City. Generally, these sites are located adjacent to or near the freeways or heavily roadways in order to capture the maximum number of users. This is the first cell site to be proposed within residential neighborhood, although there are facilities located at Diamond Bar High School, which has a residential zoning designation.. APPLICATION ANALYSIS: Subject Site The subject property is an irregularly shaped lot located at the northwest corner of Armitos Place and Darrin Drive, south of the 60 Freeway. The site is approximately 6.87 net acres, surrounding a 25,270 square foot parcel owned by the County and occupied by a fire station. 3 The project site is relatively flat along its Armitos Place and Darrin Drive frontage. -it trends downward at an approximately 2:1 slope (at its steepest point) to a canyon and then slopes upwards towards the northerly property boundary adjacent to the freeway. There is an existing 1,400 square foot single family residence on the site with frontage and access on Darrin Drive. With the exception of the residence, the site is undeveloped. Vegetation consists primarily of sage scrub plants typically found on the lower slopes of the City. The site also contains scattered trees believed to be oak and walnut. These trees will be retained although two walnuts may need to be trimmed to insure adequate line -of -sight for the antennas. The subject site is Lot 51 of Tract 42584. There are easements on the site for storm drain and storm drain ingress and egress and public utility purposes. Additionally, there is a map restriction on the subject property granting the County of Los Angeles (upon incorporation this right was transferred to the City) the right to restrict vehicular ingress and egress to Armitos Place. Project Proposal The current proposal consists of three (3) antennas and equipment cabinets. The facility is proposed on the subject site's northerly slope, facing the freeway below the undeveloped area between the fire -station and the dwelling unit. Each antennas sector consists of three (3) panel antennas measuring 5.5' wide, 2" thick and 51 " high. The antennas will be mounted back-to-back on three separate vertical poles placed in an angled row, going up the slope. The first antenna (PBMS) will be placed approximately 40' from the northerly property line adjacent to the 60 Freeway. This antenna will be placed at the lowest. elevation on the slope and will be 26.5.' The next antenna (Cox) is 24' and will be placed 10, south, above of the first antenna, going up the slope. The third antenna will be placed 10, south of the second antenna and will be 22' in height. All three antennas will rise to the same height and at their highest point will be approximately level with the flat, street level portion of the site. Within the R-1 zoning district the height limit for buildings is two stories or 35.' However, these height limits don't apply to conditionally permitted uses such as the proposed facility. For these 4 projects, the maximum height is determined by the hearing officer, in this case, the Manning Commission. As proposed, the antennas will be approximately 150' from the nearest residence and as conditioned the antennas will not be visible from the street level along Armitos Place. The antennas will be visible (although screened) from the 60 Freeway. The facility will also involve the placement of equipment cabinets on a concrete slab located south and perpendicular to the antennas. The slab will be placed into an area cut into the side of the hill and oriented parallel to the existing contours. Retaining walls not to exceed 6' in height will be used to accommodate the necessary cut. Each cabinet will occupy an area of 2'5' x 2'5' and will be. 5' in height. The slab area will be 280 square feet in size. There will also be a coaxial cable run underground -from the equipment cabinets to the antennas. The equipment cabinets will be enclosed with a 6' high chain link fence. The antennas, equipment cabinets and other support hardware will be painted to match the existing vegetation. The applicant is proposing access to the site via a 15' wide easement extending from the . curb to concrete steps going down to the equipment cabinet enclosure. Maintenance visits to the facility will be required approximately 2-3. time per year and will require a maximum of two hours per visit. ISSUES Radio Frequency Emissions/Health Impacts The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) requires that all cellular and PCS providers comply with safety standards for radio frequency electromagnetic fields. The American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) have established standards for safe human exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields. The Telecommunications Reform Act of 1996 prohibits local governments from allowing one carrier and excluding another and bars state and local governments from regulating facilities because of the 5 environmental effects of radio frequency emissions as long as facilities comply with FCC regulations. However, that does not preclude cities from requiring that telecommunication providers submit -documentation showing safety standard compliance. ' As an example, to ensure that this occurs, staff could require that the applicant submit a radio frequency radiation (RFR) field measurement study to the Planning Division verifying compliance with FCC emission standards. Locational Criteria The design and location of telecommunication facility sites is determined by several factors. Sites must be close enough to the caller to receive the signal generated by a half -watt portable phone. Sites must be far enough from one another, to eliminate cross -talk and sites must be located away from sources of interference (i.e. tall buildings, large bodies of water) which will cause signal distortion and poor communication quality. Height is one of the most important considerations when locating a site because telecommunications facilities function on a line -of -sight transmissions. Antennas must be placed at precise heights in relation to one another in order to transmit and receive signals. Therefore, topography plays a major role when determining antenna heights. Other considerations include availability of road access, electric power, land based telephone lines and/or microwave link capability, structural capacity for equipment and maximum coverage in the desired area with minimal sites. According to a representative from Pacific Bell Mobile Services (PBMS), the proposed project fills a gap in cellular coverage for approximately 1 /2 to 1 mile along the 60 Freeway and the adjacent communities. According to this representative, the project location was chosen because it was one of the few sites which was viable from a radio frequency standpoint that had a landlord that was willing to lease to PBMS. Correspondence received from PBMS (see Exhibit 1 attached) describes the alternate sites that were considered and dismissed. C.1 Land Use Compatibility Telecommunications facilities, including antennas are conditionally permitted within the Single Family Residential zone. According to the Planning and Zoning Code Sec. 22.56.010, a conditionally permitted use is a use which, because of specific characteristics such as size, technological processes, or location, requires "special consideration" to "ensure proper integration with other existing or permitted uses in the same zone..." Conditional uses are generally approved with conditions ensuring that this integration is achieved. Uses permitted by right in the R-1 zone are single family residences, accessory structures, such as garages, guest houses workshops, storage sheds, etc. Conditionally permitted uses in the R-1 zone in adult day care facilities, churches, golf courses, fire stations, libraries and other uses determined to be appropriate in a residential zones, subject to the imposition of conditions ensuring compatibility. Land uses within the neighborhood surrounding the subject property consists of single family residences and a fire station. A land use that had the potential to increase crime, produced excessive noise or light, emitted a hazardous substance, generated excessive traffic or negatively impacted the appearance of a residential neighborhood would be considered an incompatible use. It is unlikely that the proposed use would generate or have the potential to cause additional crime within the neighborhood, because the facility is unmanned and there will be no activities associated with this use, other than infrequent site maintenance visits. The antennas and equipment cabinets will not be lighted and will not generate any noise. Health hazards are addressed by the Telecommunications Act, which, , as previously stated, prohibits the City from disapproving telecommunications facilities because of the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions as long as the facilities comply with FCC regulations. The proposed use will generate minimal amounts of additional traffic within the neighborhood. 7 Strategy 2.2.4 of the General Plan states "Require that new developments be designed so at to respect the views of existing developments..." The applicant has redesigned the project, eliminating the barn, because it was determined that it was incompatible in its size and appearance with the existing neighborhood and because neighbors had expressed a concern that the barn would block their views. The proposed facility will not be visible from the street of the residential neighborhood and will not block the view of the hillside to the north of the 60 Freeway. Therefore, in terms of its appearance it will not be incompatible with the existing neighborhood. Aesthetics The redesigned project proposes to move the antennas away from the flat pad area, to the slopes below and has proposed painting the antennas a concealing color and providing landscaped screening. The equipment cabinets are proposed to be screened by a chainlink fence painted to match the surrounding landscaping and topography. The redesigned project represents a significant aesthetic improvement over the barn. Staff has reviewed the project and is proposing several enhancements and modifications should the project be approved. The first modification is to the antennas. A condition of approval has been included requiring that the individual antenna heights be reduced so that they are approximately six feet (6') below the grade of the flat pad area. This will provide additional assurance that the antennas are far enough away from the street and the residences so they will not be visible when viewed from the street. To further ensure that the antennas are screened, a berm will be required to be created at the northerly boundary of the pad area. This berm will be a minimum of 4' in height, and will be landscaped with trees for additional screening. The flat pad area fronting on Armitos Place will also be required to be landscaped, enhancing its appearance and creating an amenity for the neighborhood. A condition has also been included requiring replacement of the proposed chain link fence with a block wall painted to match the E:3 topography and additional landscaping along the wall as further screening. To screen the antennas from the freeway, trees will be required to be planted in between the antennas, in a quantity and pattern which creates the appearance of a natural grove. Staff believes, that the project, with the recommended conditions will not have a negative aesthetic impact on the residential neighborhood, or have a negative visual impact when viewed from the freeway. Access Part of the original project application was a request to remove the map restriction prohibiting vehicular ingress and egress on Armitos Place. Any decision to remove map restrictions must be supported by findings that the removal is of significant benefit to the City. Vehicular access to the project site would be utilized a few times a year for maintenance of the telecommunications facility. Since the equipment cabinets and antennas are located on the slope, access by foot would be necessary even with a driveway. On -street parking is not restricted in this area, and therefore the maintenance crews could park their trucks on the street for the limited time that service visits require. Vehicular access to the site would be of benefit solely to the telecommunications service providers. Further, a curb cut on Armitos Place would detract from the appearance of the streetscape. Public Response Since the time when this project was originally advertised, staff has received correspondence from neighborhood residents expressing opposition to this project in the form of a letter, and petitions which were submitted to the Planning Commission at the February 25, 1997 meeting and most recently received by staff on April 15, 1997 and which are included as part of the project package as Exhibit 2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Pursuant to the terms of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City has determined that this project will have no significant impact on the environment and has been determined to be Z Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA, pursuant to Section 15303. - PUBLIC .NOTIFICATION Notification of the public hearing for this project has been made in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers on January 7, 1997, February 4, 1997 and April 11, 1997. Ninety-six (96) property owners within a 500' radius of the project site were notified by mail on January 8, 1997. 494 property owners within a 500' radius of the exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 were notified by mail on February 4, 1997 and April 11, 1997. RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit 96-10, and Development Review 96-9 subject to the Conditions of Approval contained within Planning Commission Resolution 97-XX. ALTERNATE RECOMMENDATIONS: The Planning Commission may direct staff to prepare a resolution of denial or continue the project to a date certain for further discussion. REQUIRED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS: 1. The proposed project is in compliance with the General Plan; 2. The requested use at the location proposed will not: (a) Adversely affect the health, peace, comfort or welfare of persons residing or working in the surrounding area or, (b) Be materially detrimental to the use, enjoyment or valuation of property of other persons located in the vicinity of the of site, or (c) Jeopardize, endanger or otherwise constitute a menace to the public health, safety or general welfare; and 3. The proposed site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading 10 facilities, landscaping and other development features, or as is otherwise - required in order to integrate said use in the surrounding area; 4. The proposed site is adequately served: (a) By highways or streets of sufficient width and improved as necessary to carry the kind and quantity of traffic such use would generate; and (b) By other public or private service facilities as are required. REQUIRED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FINDINGS: 1. The design and layout of the proposed project is consistent with the applicable elements of the City's general plan, design guideline of the appropriate district, and any adopted architectural criteria for the specialized area, such as designated historic districts, theme area, specific plans, community plans, boulevards, or planned developments; 2. Approval of the design and layout of the proposed project is compatible with the characteristics of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain the harmonious, orderly attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22.72 of Development Review Ordinance No. 5 (1990) and the City's General Plan; 3. The architectural design of unreasonably interfere with neighboring existing or future traffic or pedestrian hazards; the proposed project will not the use and enjoyment of development and will not create 4. The design of the proposed project would provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of material texture and color that will remain aesthetically appealing and will retain a reasonably adequate level of maintenance. 5. The proposed project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. 11 FINDINGS FOR REMOVAL OF MAP RESTRICTION: 1. The removal of the map restriction is of significant benefit to the City. PREPARED BY: Catherine Johnson, Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: Application Plans Exhibit 1 - Correspondence from Pacific Bell Mobile Services Exhibit 2 - Resident's petitions Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit 96-10, Development Review 96-9 12 _ CITY OF PTAMOND BAR Lim COMMUN17� '-)EVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 21660 E. Cc Drive Suite 190 .:� (909)396-5676 Fax (909)861-3117 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION Record Owner Name Stone, Eric R. & (Last name first) Ro b i n S . Address 24401 Darrin Dr. city Diamond Bar zip 91765 Phone( ) 909-860-2474 Applicant Cox Calif. PCS. Inc. (Last name first) 2381 Morse Ave. Irvine 92714-6233 Phone( ) 714-660-0500 Case # (-()/o FPL # % — 0,� a Deposit $ a . o o 0 By CA-7-XJ Date Rec'd 15 6 Applicant's Agent Madrid. Adan. JMCG. Inc. (Last name first) 3760 Kilroy Airport Way, #440 Long Beach 90806 Phone( ) 310-981-1660 NOTE: It is the applicant's responsibility to notify the Community Development Director in writing of any change of the principals involved during the processing of this case. (Attach separate sheet, if necessary, including names, addresses, and signatures of members of partnerships, joint ventures, and directors of corporations.) Consent: I certify that I am the owner of the herein described property and permit the applicant to file this request - Signed See attached Authorization Letter Date (All record owners) Certifuadon: I, the undersigned, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information herein provided is correct to . the best of my knowledge. Print Name Adan Madrid, JMCG, Inc. (Applicant or Agent) 2 Signed Date (Applicant or Agent) Location 24401 Darrin Drive APN # 8281-029-024 (Street address or tract and lot number) Zoning R1-10 000 HNM l Ze ff --349 Previous Cases Present Use of Site Single family dwel 1 i ng unit and vacant hillside Useappliedfor An unmanned wireless telecommunications transmission facility consisting of six (6) panel antennas and six (6) equipment cabinets. Project Size (gross acres) N/A Domestic Water Source N/A Project density N/A Company/District N/A CITY OF MMOND BAR COMMUN.r. DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 21660 E. Col._-y Drive Suite 190 (909)396-5676 Fax (909)861-3117 ADMINISTRATIVE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW! DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION Record Owner Name Stone, Eric R. & (Last name first) Robin S . Address 24401 Darri n Dr cityDiamond Bar zip 91765 Phone( ) 909-860-2474 Applicant Cox California PCS, Inc. (Last name fast) 2381 Morse Ave Irvine Phone( ) 714-660-0500 case# ,09 FPL # `�6- o ' Deposit $ Receipt# By Date Rec � Applicant's Agent Madrid, Adan, JMCG, Inc. . (Last name first) 3760 Kilrov Airpnrt Way #44 Long Beach 90806 Phone( ) 310-981-1660 NOTE: It is the applicant's responsibility to notify the Community Development Director in writing of any change of the principals involved during the processing of this case. (Attach a separate sheet, if necessary, including names, addresses, and signatures of members of partnerships, joint ventures, and directors of corporations.) Consent: I certify that I am the owner of the herein described property and permit the applicant to file this request. Signed See attached Authorization Letter Date (All record owners) Certification: I, the undersigned, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information herein provided -is correct - to the best of my knowledge. Print Name Adan Madrid, JMCG, Inc. (Applicant or Agent) Signed Date (App canor Agent) Location 24401 Darrin Drive APN # 8281-029-024 (Street address or tract and lot number) Zoning R1-10,000 HNM (20 3�5 Previous Cases None PresentUseof Site Single family dwelling unit and vacant hillside Useappliedfor An unmanned wireless telecommunications transmission facility consisting of six (6) panel antennas and six (6) equipment cabinets. _ CITY OF Di- AOND BAR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 21660 E. Copley Drive, Suite 190 (909)396-5676 Fax (909)861-3117 SU13DMSION APPLICATION Record Owner Q C t LY Applicant QR Name G e E l/Q-kill--5_►-Ns. (Last name first) (Last rumc first) Address 2 4 If 6 1 Dg r rbi D r. S 15,1 kLee-r:h61yd , city 1 a w pA a_ zip ®91cU S _r�9a45 phone( ) t a ®®- 2 Y. 4 Phone(I O 3 to 2. - / 48 q Cases FPL a Deposit S - Receiptlt By Date Rec'd �%Of?it7Applieant'a Agent I Kekf- / (Last name first) 2U?o Cgd-ivsAvc. hartko U!q 110y 4zSS'3 Phar101 6S-3 —62 3 y NOTE. It is the applicant's responsibility to notify the Community Development Director in writing of any change of the principals involved during the processing of this case. (Attach separate sheet, if necessary, including names, addresses, and signatures of members of partnerships, joint vcnturea, and directors of corporations.) Consent: I certify that I tvn the owner of the herein described prope►iy and permit the applicant to fiie this request. Signed sa eyPAg6- t F;1e Date (All record owners) Certification. I, the undersigned, hereby certify under penally of perjury that the information herein provided is correct to the best of my knowledge_ Print Narne XLcNT Ke. T w (Applicant or Agent) Sign Date pplicant or Agent) Location 3 %tgCk1 04triti 6Yf- (APAJ '# $2-8 1 '62 1 —oz!f ) (Street address or tract and lot number) --`'' R�� between and =- (Street) (Streit) :� -- Zoning -' HNM �1 Previous C-� CU 46.10 IPA It- 9 (Mv®si( ) Present Use of Site S ; h v- o Iv 4 ► YK _ cur art,. � ,,.� r w..�DS _�D � rR �� - l--J�' ' Use appliW for Domestic Water Source _ /V�� Company/District A1A Method of Sewuge Disposal `�ll�� Sanitation District At IA Grading of Lots by Applicant? YES NO ,x Amount (Show necessary grading design on site plan or tent. map) LEGAL DESCRIPTION (All ownership comprising the proposed lots/project) if petitioning for zone change, attach legal description of exterior boundaries of area subject to the cbange.) Gvf t6 roI on 46.9 C"- Project Site: —W—A _ Tentative Map Number Gross Area Lots: Existing Proposed Area devoted to : Structures I 300 V-- Open Space Residential project and G ross Area No. of floors Proposed Density N Units/Acre Number and types of Units Residential Parking: Type Required P,r�o/vviidded Total � FILE No. 162 04/16 '97 12:36 ID: PAGE 2 EYHOBI k - Pacific Bell Mobile Services History of Candidate Search -- Search Ring LA-462-00 Pacific Bell Mobile Services' proposed antenna facility at 24401 Darrin Drive (L A-462-02) is part of the company's wireless PCS network in the LA basin. It is designed to cover approximately one mite of hilly terrain of the 60 Freeway and the adjacent communities_ Connecting sites include LA-209 located at 2 Rancho Road in Pomona and site LA-211 located at 249 Gentle Springs Lane in Diamond Bar. The Damn Drive project fills what would otherwise be a coverage hole for approximately 1/2 to 1 mile along the 60 Freeway and the adjacent communities. PBMS' contract site acquisition team pursued a number of options before ultimately leasing and submitting for land use approval the Darrin Drive site. LA County Fire Station #121 at 346 Armitos Place: The Fire Station was the primary candidate. When approached in March, 1996, with a request to lease space for a communications site, the Fire Department declined, citing conflict of interest because the Fire Department was in negotiations with PBMS for use of microwave links. Carlton Peterson Paris (North Side of Freeway): The park was considered by PBMS' contract site acquisition team. However, because of the topography (hills) blocking a portion of freeway, it was ruled out as not viable from a radio frequency standpoint. Vacant Iota (Residential): PBMS' contract site acquisition team contracted two institutional owners of residentially -zoned that abuts the 60 Freeway. Both landlords declined to enter into a lease agreement with PBMS. One of the parcels is owned by the City of Industry. Carl Burnett representing the City, Industry declined to lease to PBMS, saying the City did not wish to enctunber the property and inhibit future development. Another parcel is owned by the Pomona Unified School District. Joann Leong and Ron Young, representing the District mentioned the landlord had plans for the property and there would be no interest in leasing to PBMS for the foreseeable future. 24401 Darrin Drive: This location was chosen because of it is one of the few sites viable from a radio frequency standpoint that wii 1 provide coverage to the area and had a landlord willing to lease to PBMS. The property was leased and submitted for land use approval because two small antennas could be mounted atop a single post with minimal visual impact to the surrounding area. April 15, 1997 , -If '97 APR 15 R! :5 6 To the City of Diamond Bar: Attached are copies of the signed petitions that we have gathered from some of our neighbors that are opposed to the proposed project, Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. Also attached is a copy of the minutes of a, recent Planning Commission meeting C (meeting of March 24, 1997) from the city of Thousand Oaks regarding the unmanned wireless telecommunications facility. We, the Citizen Committee, would like to have them forwarded to the Planning Commission and the City Council for their review. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, Mr. Jim Bartley Mrs. Jo Bartley Ms. Helen Arlene Britt Mr. H M Briz Mr. Mel Davis Mr. Armando Gonzalez Mrs. Marie Levan -Nguyen Mr. Brij Sharma Mr. Doug Yuen Mrs. Mary Yuen ----.._'►.p� '..'_-.+•�1.,/�� .. __ ....__ -- - ,... . ,Ifs vlub pi •. .. _ ... �`��—G(-c21/ Froll -lY■,. p\`!y■ peter said he hopes the � •<'�''Jar'i�rf: /zrt�/;e,:, "TRING CONT� , t" � 1 tr i.. the bra nmr ro AlanntnRn", vinpl thur Cellular phone ►�y ThanighAPri115,1991, .l °m '`'•0'AIm 4111n p ani e , #a Sines' Utttr is n $ih•r i_ nd t I Sner;uudll bnsalr. DiamO Bar facesplan for antenna COn1I11 nPlrn inxaJ.vs. 'ry i11'la Etep•cnhlr.E��I. By June Casagrande, Staff Writer tower with nl .Y °pposit1O11 Stone h flashing red li They call it Eric's Ditch 1p and his phis, safe b describe it as awlfe Robin missi on keeping as far as se acres of grassy, sloping fact, no one mere plug Cellular trans- paratin g land knows Pole, In from residential areas.possible g a Dhe P nd B look like because what d will boyhood from the p° Bar neigh_ "I have s mona Pell keep Cox and pacific mall children," Freeway, p revising their plans for said, "There are lots of childreLevan the structure, From Marie Levan, living °We've in this neighborhood, If room window, it se this co Worked hard to sure it's safe, why they're so Pleasant ryes as a community make build it at the ne y don't they green underline to the sa,d Levan Y What it is today," School? - Sprawling count a 12-Year resident, ' But Stone high school?" But if two �` view beyond Pointing out her front window, Who studied elec cellular phone co she added, " tronics at a vocational school, nies and the mpa- We cant even put says these concerns are based on . have their wa roperty owners up TV antennas here Y Y her front window want to put a bi to 'and the Jun) science," will instead frame a cellular there?" g tower right "If the Phone tower.. work the Y would do their home - Cox California P "No one has an such a low level of enerthere's Pacific Bell CS and an unsightly site " y intentions of Mobile Se "Diamond Bar Stone said, their concerns are unwa need to build a cellular rvices want quality installat,onseS its on the land phone tower on he said. located at the*northwest Impact, and this Wlth low Levan and her nei Comer of Darrin Drive and feint," won't be an already attended two Planning �lrmitos Place, Y dif- neighbors have f the Eric Stone owner And scenery isn't the resi- commission hearings on the parcel and namesake of dents' only concern, P al, The co pro- . e t D,,tch, is ea international stud ``, five -yea mm,,ss,,on postponed i he two co gar to lease it to y now underar sions to the cosmecause of revi- mmunications comps- Or y by the ies, World Health pan,, But Levan and a handful of her residents are fighting to �p construction of the tower, ich would improve cellular "ne service in certain nearby 'as• Reside in opposed to the lc'ct envision an unsightly .alkl DEPENDABLE SERVICE` gan,zat,on is investigatingResidents said they'11es Plans whether cellular protesting the keep sions cause cancerhone transmis..' project, no matter disease of other illrlesseseimers how many heai�nI it takes. "This is all just to benefit one Previous studies failed to Person, one famil such a link: In the prove at the Y— EricStolle's man meantime expense °f everybody y countries involved in the else," silid Mel Davis current study Ire praclicin resident of the neighborhooda 20"Year (lent avoidance" pla n g resident That's not 11 , Yi g it want it.,, ght, and we don't Call 1800 LA TIMES to stibscHbe, Eifel, en • /; INVENTORY RCn AIMITIONAL 2()(Z1, IITI, CAIIIN1 • �G'}ll'IF, I,AN9. OAK (',� • Disl'►.A)'CANINIS'1's 1)RASTI('AL1,1' lttsl)UC'1 1)1?SK IMAW1:1? C'A131N1: S'I:'i UTING ,1'I''� 9.otl ;o.tt taq`uLvtllrem � li it Lr.ka thi, µpal and trrars this trill, it umst br Alnnnin ton• liurrt• in; Irr n Alamm�>;nrn Ihkvdu thr aatking. I N Ir 2 L�18-91 �M lJ S 13 �VINGTON etitively Priced, ionally Instnlldlouse of Floors staller•Since 1975 don n Ave �I Nest Covin5 9 Z g 04-09-1997 09:06AM FROM LAW OFFICES OF E J ACOSTA TO 13108144523 P.02 MINUTES OF THIE REGULAR MEETINq OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF THOUSAND OAKS MEETING OF MARCH 24,1997 The regular meeting of the Planning Commission was called to order at 7:02 p.m. by Chair Powers in the Council Chambers, 2100 Thousand Oaks Boulevard, Thousand Oaks, California with Commissioners Anderson, Carpenter, FrieIds, and Polanski present. Also present were Staff Members: Assistant City Attorney Schreiner Deputy Director Sangster Principal Engineer Reithmayr Associate Planner Burgess Associate Planner Young Consultant Jonathan Kramer, M.K. Wyatt & Assoc. VCFD Larry Williams CRPD Representative Gilmore TOPD Sergeant Matson Sn'Administrative Secretary Sepe WRITTEN COMMENTS/ANNOUNCEMENTS/CONTINUANCE: 1. Letter dated 3/18/97 from Susan & Robin Perrenoud (con) re: Case A - DP 96-727/AT&T Wireless Services and Case B - DP 96-726/Pacific Bell Mobile Services 2. Letter dated 3/18/97 from Richard & Margot Ball (pro) re: Case A - DP 96-727/AT&T Wireless Services and Case B - DP 96-726/Pacific Bell Mobile Services 3. Letter dated 3/20197 from Jon E. Morris, Real Estate Mgr for AT&T re: Case A - DP 96- 727/AT&T Wireless Services 4. Letter dated 3/18/97 from Jacqueline Ruchman (con) re: Case A - DP 96-727/AT&T Wireless Services and Case B - DP 96-726/Pacific Bell Mobile Services 5. Letter dated 3/17/97 from James G., Roxanne C. & Vivian A. Horning (con) re: Case A - DP 96-727/AT&T Wireless Services and Case B - DP 96-726/Pacific Bell Mobile Services 6. Letter received 3/24/97 from Vito Covino (pro) re: Case A - DP 96-727/AT&T Wireless PCD.440,AVLis/Mi 0-24-47 1 APR 09 '97 10:14 60S 642 5484 PAGE.002 04-09-1997 09=06AM FROM LAW OFFICES OF E J ACOSTA TO 131oel44523 P.03 Services and Case B - DP 96-726/Pacific Bell Mobile Services 7. Letter dated 3/19/97 from David W. Wolkwitz (pro) re: Case A - DP 96-72VAT&T Wireless Services and Case B - DP 96-726/Pacific Bell Mobile Services g. Postcard reed from Wade Zimmerman (con) re: Case A - DP 96-7271AT&T Wireless Services and Case B - DP 96-726/Pacific Bell Mobile Services 9. Note dated 3/18/97 from Jill Barker (pro) re: Case A - DP 96-727/AT&T Wireless Services and Case B - DP 96-726/Pacific Bell Mobile Services 10. Letter dated 3/24197 from Drew Oliver (pro) re: Case A. - DP 96-727/AT&T Wireless Services and Case B - DP 96-726/Pacific Bell Mobile Services PUBLIC pISCII SS ION: Don Voles Pres. of Greater Shadow Oaks HOA, 338 E. Sidlee St., T.0.; unhappy with references made at the 3/10197 meeting that HOA was not an active and viable organization; requested apology from Commission and was extended by Chair Powers. Cathy K cal 571 Westminster St., T.O., wanted to make comments regarding paint colors at The Promenade (PCR 182); Chair Powers requested that she delay her comments until the Commission had an opportunity to review the report which was inadvertently absent from the packet; copy of report given to Ms. Koch. Nick Quidwai, N.P., encouraged support for the Animal Crackers running for Grand Marshal; paint colors at The Promenade appears to be well received by the community; felt Council should have approved the Commission's attendance of APA conference in San Diego on April 3-9. PUBLIC HEARINGS: D 96-727 - A T & T WIRELESS SERVICESIDP 96-72b - PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES �I,Y} Speaker cards: [J Lane ank repres. AT&T, 2927 de la Vina, Santa Barbara, pro; JeffMcHaddad, repres. Pacific Bell, 5959 W. Century Blvd., L.A-, pro; Steven Isbell, radio freq. cons.; 5959 Century Blvd., 9200, LA, pro; David B repres. AT&T, 1109 Bath, SB., pro; Fred D. Burkhardt, repres. Chamber of Commerce, 625 W. Hfflcrest Dr., T.O., pro; Tames T. Aidukas, 1395 Oakridge Ct., T.O., con; Carrie 3421 Indian Mesa Dr., T.O., pro.; RQbert Phipps, 1489 Wilder St., T.O., con; Dave Carpenter, 1743 La Granada Dr., T.O., con; Roger Barker, 1394 Oakridge Ct., T.O., con; NDra Aidu 1395 Oakridge Ct., T.O., con; Paul Palkovic, 1629 Shadow Oaks, T.O., con; p bbY Carlo 1859 Sapra St., T.O., con; Ken Block 1625 Shadow Oaks Pl., T.O., con; Marshall Pepp 1748 Country Oaks, T.O., con; Dana Krege7, 1784 Country Oaks Ln., T-O., con; Mark Sandstrom 3421 Indian Mesa, T.O., pro; Bruce McCinnev, 1912 El Monte Dr., T.O., con. <,, KDA0 12/=0/ .rin-M4-87 2 04-09-1997 09:07AM FROM LAW OFFICES OF E J ACOSTA TO 13108144523 P.04 Statement cards: J. Michael & Pamela B. Sipple, 1875 Sapra St., T.O., con; Tim & Indburg Burke, 1790 Country Oaks Lane, T.O., con; Karen Phipps, 1489 Wilder St., T.O., con; Ron & Lyn Koller, 1868 Sapra St., T.O., con; Frances Clohessy, 1492 Valley High Ave., T.O., con; Richard & Judy Masters, 1867 Sapra St., T.O., can; Tun Masters, 1678 Shadow Oak, T.O., con; Chong W. Lee, 1687 Shadow Oaks Pl., T.O., con; Josh Leach, 47 Ocean View, 910, S.B., pro; Maureen Faulkner, 1629 Shadow Oaks Pl., T.O., con; Susan Perrenoud, 1657 Shadow Oaks Pl., T.O., con; Bradley Hess, 1810 Chapala St., 98, S.B., pro; Kurt Sauter,1516 El Dorado Dr., T.O., con; Ingrid Orr, 1860 Sapra St., T.O., con; Bob Perrenoud, 1657 Shadow Oaks Pl., T.O., con; J. T. Huang, 1378 Oakridge Ct., T.O., con; Ron Niiddler, 1605 Shadow Oaks PI., T.O., con; Joseph Raboy, 1648 Shadow Oaks Pl., T.O., con; Paul Laroche, 1992 Shaw Ct., T.O., con. Motion by Co,nrnissioner Carpenter pied (3-2 FOOds and Powers oovosedl to deny the Miti9ate —, Negative Declaration; subject to the following findings: Aesthetics - inadequacy of mitigation from roadways and park site; cumulative impacts. DP 96-726 -Pacific Bell Res. 11-97 Motion h Commissioner Carpenter passed (3-2 Frields and Powers opoosed) to deny a request to construct an unmanned wire ess telecommunications facility; locate approximately 800 feet north of Shadow Oaks Place and 300 feet east of Church Road: subject to the foIlowinst findings. The granting of this request would be detrimental to the public welfare and enjoyment of private property by the residents immediately adjacent to the proposed site. 2. The granting of the perrrrit is not consistent or in compliance with all provisions of the Scenic Highways Element and the intent and purpose of the Protected Ridgeline Policies. 3. Approval of this request would set a precedent for attracting additional wireless telecommunication facilities in this location. 4. There are alternative sites available that could provide necessary coverage with less environmental impact. There will be a negative visual impact from this development as viewed from the adjacent Old Meadows Park and the proposed picnic pavilion on the plateau below the site. 6. There will be a negative impact on the proposed lookout site for recreational users. 7. There will be a negative impact on the property values of adjacent residences due to the perceived potential health effects of this facility. 8. There will be a negative impact on the surrounding residential neighborhood due to visual intrusion on the protected ridgeline within their immediate view corridors. rCD-+40- 2/MY Kzn3-24-97 3 APR 09 197 10:15 805 642 5484 PAGE.004 04-09-1997 09:08AM FROM LAW OFFICES OF E J ACOSTA TO 13108144523 P.05 DP 96-721- AT&T Wireles Servic p,es. 12-97 726. Should an appeal be filed, the Comnrission recommends that the following revisions to conditions be incorporated: Condition No. 19 (AT&T) and No. 54 (Pacific Bell) revised: Condition No. 35 (AT&T) and No. 70 (Pacific Bell) revised: S 11 is site. Ll Condition No. 14 (AT&T) and No. 49 (Pacific Bell) revised: kcbihl the utility The applicant shall µ as po not to lines as -far -away fram sting trees. Condition No. 30 and No. 65 revised: Any expansion or modification of the facility shall require the filing of a flX modification application to be reviewed by the Planning Commission. Add new condition under DESI section for both AT&T and Pacific Bell: ucD:AA .ej1T„A Min3-2d-97 4 04-09-1997 09:09AM FROM LAW OFFICES OF E J ACOSTA TO 13108144523 P.06 LD 669/RPD 96 506 FRANK McDONALD TRUST tER� si 60 cre o si le- detac ed dwell s• loca ed n the outh si e of La am Poa roximatel 500 feet south of Lyn oa . SUP 95 902 (Maiorl Modification Nod LAKES HORE LEARNING SWORE Speaker cards: TosephBlanco, repres. App., 2695 E. Dorninquez St., Carson, pro; Jack Roy, repres. App., 2695 E. Dominguez St., Carson, pro. The Comm s�rianimou5ly agreed to continue to allow an increase in logo sign area t t ex eed i ordm na oe requirements for an ex Bing, tenant to an approved shoppin c ter; located on the southeast co of Thousand Oaks and Westlake Boulelvard(4050 East Thousand Oaks B ul rd . SCELLANEODS i[TEIvIS. CORRESPO ENE AND REFERRALS: (Continued to Meeting of 4/7/97) A. Arroyo Conejo Bikeway/Greenbelt Project (PIA) B. On -building Sign Design Guidelines for Commercial Development (pTUi} C. PCR 140 - Moorpark Village (Caruso Holdings) Building Sign Design (BR) D. PCR 182 - Paint Colors at The Promenade (BR) PLANNIN(T DTRFCT01t REPORTS AND REFERRALS: None. MINV7CES; Minutes of March 10, 1997, approved (5-0) as amended. COiVIMISSION DISCUSSIQN None. PC1>4a4..dT--fU- ILU-97 APR 09 '97 10:17 E 805 642 5464 PAGE.006 04-09-1997 09:09AM FROM LAID OFFICES OF E J ACOSTA TO 13108144523 P.07 ADO MB—T at 11:25 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. on Monday, April 7, 1997, for a special meeting. $ha-Powwers, Chair — Planning Commission Date Approved PCD: �;^ "-?A- 7 6 TOTAL P.07 i. r�� r� •�-J r O(.1C Cn'7 CAOA Olt -I n]f JOIN • [ , , ,: ♦ • '97�, 1DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of DiamondBar zoning code regarding. Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. 5� �i C `��tr lzi- � e< nya 1�f1� 11 1 Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature �¢�2� V1SGi Tjt{elRCL -% Residence Address ( Number, Street) c 1 �16"J L6. Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 1)3�-7 � PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed I- to another use. Resident / Property(Qwner Name (Printed) Signature \j Residence Address ( Number, Street) 65=� S!d'�1 L6. Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersicyned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. J0 /L 'C - r, Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Si atur -3 23 14�9/�'7 Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) e� Signature v S D12-t; Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersicned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by sinning this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property -is- _ - located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. 72 �ixlcew(fve)Aj Z//- r7ol-I Resident Property Owner Name (Printed) Sic,nat re 0 373 Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 560 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone. which, we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) ySinat�u�re Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 �!�-J Lo. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. �\Jy \;' N CU,JC� �J Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) C i Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVFNOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone -which we feel should not be changed to another use. M'�R:Je --T, ue,\� a(v - 'N3 C L,6IZ7J Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) I,\ 1�%�-2- 6'--, Signat e Residence Address ( Number, Street) - Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our. residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Pyc rpp�ty Owner Name (Printed) Sio-nature f/ Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California , do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) - Signature (� A-Ok 1 TO S pC� Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 Imply III • We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Res' 6n% / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature o Residence Address ( Number, Street) j Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wifeless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / roperty. Owner Name (Printed) -: ^^ �l Signat re Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, ivireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in oicr residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code reaardinc, Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chanced to another use. JA-6-06 Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) v I Sibnathre, r--m ITds PL , Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENTg�IE— W 16-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning, code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. yU5�i s. P)A Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature -�a hl w( -(0s- �-A-C Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 •97 IAPR i 5 ::n2 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wifeless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. I 7� Resid nt / roperty Owner Name (Printed) Signatur Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 964WAND-I)EVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature OZ, Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 -- ._., .._ICU.. _•;�..... c a , ' •11''IR]"111 � The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential nei 0rhborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature' Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 �' 1 '� 2 •97 !APR 15 �'PTITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. uU IL-rA/' -� 1 A - Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature 3 G ► 1�-R,�M -ros � �-,�-c � Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST! C OADITIONAL USE PERMIT The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. kesident / Property Owner Name (Printed) nature y sZ Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 9&�9 TPR 15 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provi8ion of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regardinc, Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. 77�! S 7,0 Zn x/ Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT;o, ` 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 77 APR 15 :1 i .02 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by sijning this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code rebardina Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96r9 a,PR 15 -11.:- The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, -vvireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in ouf- residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Sic,rdture Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96T9 AN 15 -M :02 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. �`I:::�:. 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 . 97 ."i' :02 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. i— A. L Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature ; Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONALT'SkPERMIT i 1 � 1 1 / •' ' • � ,'1 , M 1 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neio hborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by sijninE,r this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code rebardino, Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. V i N H ItAT McS-UV,&N Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) r Siignature �'D Ap—,' ,f 1 0 5 P Ly i C1r.� �G� C-,a, 1 l 7 6 Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT n1 ' 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT R-UVTRW 96= The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wifeless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 ETITIN AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT R.EVIEW,96=,9� t5 1-11 :C3 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIYt 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-9. xr: ► 5 Al 1 :03 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the -subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Tfi Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USEVERM-1-T; 96 16 The subject discLtssed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in oLtr residential neighborhood_ We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. rkuic) (-Lzr<-I�' Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Sig ature Residence Address ( Number, treet) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USKPEP2MT 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIF,W tl :03 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is -that the subject property i-s located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. i Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT {, ( t DEVELOPMENT ,, r 96 99 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature z4�7�" ml ks Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 '77, 15 1.:1 :03 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, ivireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning. code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main -reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) �� ., Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. . We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is -that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address (.Number, Street) .Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT RE` IEWW96=9.03 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 EITIN AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-1 A DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 6 !'9 7 `` :03 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regardinc Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. A �' Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Sibnature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERIMIT-..::'. 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-,o 5 -: ; :03 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in otir residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject.property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. ResidentJ--Pxoperty Owner Name (Printed) Signature -J Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERA-i 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 94,_9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, tivireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. _ 'Resident"/ Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE -PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 97 :;�, 15 ..03 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property- i located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 960 AND DEVELOPMENT% The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities /antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 -97 15 _03 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California , do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. JZ9 -'Resi e / Property/ n r a Signature Ayyc? e (Printed) Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 r , , , , . 1 i '• ', , �' III t 1 1 1 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code recardin� Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chanced to another use. t / Property Owner lame (Printed) Signatu e Residence Addre s ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96 � The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in ozcr residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. L V /;I b1z) b--1 s Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 03 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONALPERMIT 96 0 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Com-r�ission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signa re 42,0 Ca,-111!24` D1- Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PFTTTTON AGAINST CONDITIONAL 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REV`IM' 96-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our - residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California , do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. ARR,esi/ ent / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature �(Q to Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 96DEVEOPMENT 96, We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. 'l 04 V, �r Al ojuo U Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) l o Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. A Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 O ' We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California , do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. i Reside t-/_Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature P Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 =f PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. AA o,v 0 v6 /q, Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature 0 C' P c) 7) Residence Address ( umber, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California , do hereby by signing, this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Sigfiature - Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 - o :- PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code recardin� Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition .is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 = - We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature 3 Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason, for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number,. Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning, code regarding, Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. !�j Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Si -/nature Residence Address (N ber, StreW Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 �n PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot. radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. 17-�. CMG' Resident / Property Owner a (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 i lgii st, Otto I We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner,Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 `fl PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning, Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. IVA Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) / f .,_ Cam/ �• •,. Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) - Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. 6- -n4 eS R r 0 TV n/ Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature 0 �).' CP/ C 2)ti . Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 tJi PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 9.6-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) n Signature (-u c) Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, ivireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Own6r Name (Printed) kv mature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities r antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use., �arT1�-� Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) S* nature - I - Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We; the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) S anature �Z 7� - ) r �`� r �\ Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius' of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California , do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. 14r 2 V 67 V3 Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Zile Y Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 - �_, PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. wa*- Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) CAI�A 1 Signature Residence Address ( Number, Stree Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning, Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code recrardino, Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature -� Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. �y Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. i ( K� r-c, Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) = Sib,nature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 l PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code retarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 425 84 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident/ Pro-Dertv Owner Name (Printed) J Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) �17 Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident /Property �> wn� Na e (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoninc, code recardinc, Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed I- to another use. Resi'&mt Prope6y'Owner N6e (Print4)- Sicrnatir'e-�' Residence Address (Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. J. �. D .L-i, Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) j Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California , do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which .we_feel should not be changed to another use. 4� Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) I r Signature �' Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. hor- � f IJ A Ct I V / Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) -, Signature 141 61 L. r Residence Address ( Number, Street) ' Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 D , We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning, code retarding, Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. 17 i Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature _ 1 i- Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 :_5 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERIMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residentiall zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Sign m ure l Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 F" • � III � 11 1 , 1 9 a 11�1;� 111 11 M—ral q A1111MIM QLVA We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 5010 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zonino, code reoardinc, Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature c Residence Address (Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code reaardinc, Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) .�� ...� >-�'-d 1- �_ ."-�--�-7 �---.^,tic-��_.--.. • ; Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 10•I OW I �, We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which wefeel should not be changed to another use. Resident % Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) J Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. J L: Resident / Toperty Owner Name (Printed) Signature _ Sac Z� - Residence Address ( Number, Street) - -_ Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 KAI We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone,which we feel should not be changed to another use. t / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature ='a Residence Address (Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) -- Signat& ( Street) Residence Address Number, Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 �. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California , do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning, Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Prop 'rty Owner Name (Printed) Signature Zx/. Residence Address ( Number, Street); Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 _1 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. �s Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) VLK ' -L-11) t 11,1 Signature �ci L'�� s�I l 1 Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law 'and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature t�CiS S Lzl-5 .? i ry D L U - Residence Address ( Number, Street) -_- ` J Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding. Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chanced to another use. " /�/I /y I/% 1 ' Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) l% Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) ! = Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 :� We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature " Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by sic,ninc, this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chanced to another use. L LNPAL— Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature �-;.c� z L�� a c k • _ be n hc4,,.r. �� , � �7� S' � _ . Residence Address (Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 "j t •, , , ,Will 1111��j l ( , 1 l l We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. 10 J� rq f5 V , IN4 ) �,Lf Resident / Property 6wner Name (Printed) c2g3%oZ U/fi7) A414^.119 ZX Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 O;D Ab, &,; �/ L ol-, 3//7l7 7, PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond B ar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional. Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel_ should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address (Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, ivireless j telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed _-, to another use. si nt / Property Owner Name (Printed) , I 6 /(r Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wifeless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. 7-7 :7 Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature 2 ;5?'C' r30 Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / roperty Owner Name (Printed) Signa ure Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 vial MUD Hal �i % We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) - Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 rJ. _ PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. 1�J- �,zM,17m H?+ �r Resident / Property Owpe�Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 =' We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject.property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. ti Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) _ Signature - Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERLMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) 1 - Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) - Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 • I• The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wifeless telecommunications traizsfnission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) - Signature D "- J Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. V Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 Gam. � lCC_ The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless teleco7n7nunications transmission facilities/ antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by sic,nina this petition request the Planning Commission of the city ID 1.) I-D of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of - Diamond Bar zoning, code recarding, Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident Property Owner Name (Printed) :> tJl Sio-naturew/ -J Residence Address (Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, ivireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Sre Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, Tvireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. �Nk �. Resident / Propert Owner ame (Printed) Signature Residence Address (Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we -feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Prope Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address'( Number, Street) -J Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 - . t , ♦ rV IN R14MI IN We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code reoardinj Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. 1 The main reason for the opposition is that the subject, property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. a� Resident / perty Owner Name (Printed) ianature � 1 Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) S i a ature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 - TITIN AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California , do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Name (Printed) .73 , Signat \ Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 _ tr 0 AND DEVEOPMENT969 We, the undersi'gned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this - petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code retarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chanced to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Si o-natiare Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. 49�hlrnnn-AA Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this Petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Develo-oment Review 96-9. L The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature _= 4c) Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 - PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature ti Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 1, M The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in oicr residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code relgarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resideg/Pro/p rty wner Name (Printed) v_ 77 L/ _ = Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name rinted) Signature z�-�l°2- t^r"th-�-�r� �"�., b il��b �ilal� , ('.� G117�•�� _, _ Residence Address ( Number, Street) "= t Diamond Bar, Ca .91765 96-10 AND ,. O. , We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. 7- Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature / L y Residence Adeess ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California , do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is. located in a residential zone which.we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) � �' A L �cr f Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 J - _ a PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Addre�s ( Number, Street) l.Tl -_- Diamond Bar, Ca 91765,' L .A - I V1 r III. WIA We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Xddress ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 �;, PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVEOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. C.8 goc-J = LA /') (-,,- Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 -p 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of,state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. �� (L/, �✓ -� �iE'.�r'<i�t� %jam%��- :�� % _. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed)Uri _ Qnature - = Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this petition request the Planni.nc, Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zonine, code reaardinc, Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be chanced to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) y 4 ianature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 The subject discussed is the co -location of an unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California , do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoninj code recardino, Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. a Resident / Property Owner Name kbrinted) n V VU"" ' 1 Signature `1 Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 PETITION AGAINST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-10 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-9 The subject discussed is the co -location of an Unmanned, wireless telecommunications transmission facilities / antennas in our residential neighborhood. We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within Tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundaries of Tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California , do hereby by signing this petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Resident / Property Owner Name (Printed) Signature Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 We, the undersigned resident / property owner within the 500 foot radius of the subject property within tract 42584 and owners within a 500 foot radius of exterior boundary of tract 42584 within the city limit of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby by signing this Petition request the Planning Commission of the city of Diamond Bar to reject the provision of state law and the city of Diamond Bar zoning code regarding Conditional Use Permit 96-10 and Development Review 96-9. The main reason for the opposition is that the subject property is located in a residential zone which we feel should not be changed to another use. Res' d . nt / r 'perty Owner Name (Printed) Signature DMVII M .a - 70 Residence Address ( Number, Street) Diamond Bar, Ca 91765 - o .- .P FINAL LUP GENERALNOTES,,:_ „,I^.r I, CASE NO. L DRANUN6S ARE NOT ro SCALED, W¢1TTEN DIMEk91oN5 TAKE PREceDEH1Ce , - ; 1 +' i i s.l ..1 i PROPRIETARY INFORMATION MOP013ED COX AND PBMS APLFpOSES ONLOf- PLANS Y,, LN_ESS INOTED OTH04.1T0e-d. TFE BEIWRAL GON7RiGTOR5 1., 1 , . I I I . , , SCZFERTMISHALL IW j�GtgA1iY TO�cohtPL2Te IPMEttT, THE IN CONTAINED INSTALLATIONS A5 IN,& F9 IBED HEREIN. IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION K�S FAauff DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY T. PRIOR TO THE SU5MIS51ON OP BIDS, THE CONTRACTORS INVOLVED SHALL VISIT DI NATURE. ANY USE OR TI-- FROPoSED PROFAHLI RIZ M-'Tt_ HTHTION ALL 60�VITIOW-1 AND CONTRACT ACTING 7 (�(1 ` Z DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN l , THAT WHICH RELATES TO COX DOCUh@v,51 FIEL37 CoNDMONS AND CONPIRM THAT THE PRO ECT MAY Be J , STRCALICTLY P PCS HI INC., IS ACGOMPLISHEV AS SHOHN PRIOR TO PiOCEE I" HTH CONSTFZI GTION. ANY STRICTLY PROHIBITED ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR DISCREPANCIES ARE TO Be BRLV6Hr TO THE 24401 DARFOR DRIVE ATTENTION Or TM ARCaTZaT/tNGINEER. DRAWN BY: JJR 3. THE 6ENAL CORACTOR SHALL REC tRNTEIVE MTTEN AUTHoMZA11ON TO pROOEp NTH CONSTWIGTION PRIOR ro STARTING HORK ON ANY ITEM NOT CHECKED BY: CRC CLEARLY VEINED BY THE CONSTRUCTION DRAVoW_5/GONTRAr-T DOCUMENT`S• DAMOND BAR %no/As i, THE! CONTRACTOR SHALL 5UPElNI5C AND DIRECT THE PROJECT DESCRIBED ISSUES OR SHALL BE SpLE.Y RF�P OHL9IBL.E F oR ALL HEREIN. THE CGNTRAGT ICXES SEQUENCES AND PROGELVRES AHD FOR rGOORDIINNATTINMETHODS, ALL PORTIONS OF � HORK�ER 7� �T• DATE DESCRIPTION 4 1 97 PRELJMINARY LUP 5. THE CONTRACTOR "HALL INSTALL ALL EWIPMENT AND MATERIALS COX PRWECT # L .. A267 OT1�N1I5E OR NY•ERE l-OCAL CODI ORDINAW-S5 TIAKE FREC�'�E INSTALLED SHALL BE B. ALL AGGORl;lAWP_E NTH ALL APPLICABLfV ON RojE6T AND E �ES > Ti` IN LPBW PROJECT # L.A46'. �91NORDINANG r, RSHALL�An� APD L� OES ARDtR Of* ANY HTH ALL PL9LIC AUTHORITY, M.NICiPAL AND UTILITY COFT'ANY 5PECIFICATIONS, AND L.oGAL AND STATE JTRISDICTIONAL CODES BEARING ON THE rWZFORMANCE Gfi a THE WORr- T, GOGE7V.�RN- TGGNTIpo aHEWTS UPDATED NTH THE LA REV55 � AND 5Er OF ADDEfOA OR CLARIFICATIONS POR THE I&E BY At1 somNE' INVOLVED TommILLIPS "A WITH THE PROJECT. NAO""H THE 5TFDr.VZAL ALTERED BY THIS T� ION ITPROJECT NOTED OT}I@ii'IISEFACILITY ARE NOT TO 9. DETAILS IN UjDED HEREIN ARE INTENDED TO SHOW END R�I1LT OF DESIGN. P MINOR MODIFICATIONS, MAY BE RE UREO TO SUIT JOB CONDITIONS OR SITUATIONS, AND MODIFICATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS, PART OF THE SCOPE or WORK 10. S�PENETRA T ALS IF PFAPPI. Gl ABLE TO n-0S PAC AND/GR in' I � Y SHEET IN PROJECT SimAL THAN LEGEND �Jm il. z � A�1 ABLTMEN I� FeET TRAVEL p15 � To � Pao S O THIS PROJECT IS A COMMERCIAL WIRELESS THM PROJEOT AREA D)RINO GONSTR k_-llO o _ _ _ _ ®_ _ _ ® PROPERTY LINE TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY FOR PCS 12 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAIM NECESSARY pROVISIONS TO PROTECT ExISTIN6 _ _ _ _ — _ _ _ _ _ _ STREET CENTERLINE TELECOMMUNICATION CONSISTING OF: T-1 TITLE SHEET IMPRo�EMENM, EASEr-srrg, PAVING, CURBINr,, ETC• wwNO 64NSTFRIZT10 INSTALLATION OF COX AND PBMS BASE TRANSCEIVER UPON AVE C4W OP WORK, GC4"TLTOR "HALL REPAIR ANY DAMAGE THAT FENCING STATIONS (3TS) MOUNTED ON NEW CONC. PAD INSIDE A-1 SITE PLAN MAY HAVE OCCURRED DlC TO C,ppLSTTa.IiTIDN ON OR ABOUT THE PROPERTY 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL SEE TO IT VAT GENERAL HORK AREA IS KEPT GLEAN { E—L— L E a= ELECTRICAL SERVICE ID RETAINING WALL A-2 ENLARGED LEASE AREA PLAN AND HAZARD FRET` GVR1N0 GONSnRUGTIoN AND 5 DISPOSE of ALL DIRT, CVM, RUBBISH AM REMOTE E AM-IENT NOT SPEGIFIE37 AS, REMAIWN6 ON THE A-3 ELEVATIONS PAINT spurs, PREMISES OR 01' m NATURE- CONDITION � � � ABBREVIATIONS SYMBOLS LIST 2 ARARAYS/3 ANTENNAS PER ARRAY/6 I TOTALPOLES 14THE ARC41TWT5/EMINEFIZ5 HAVE MADE 2VmRY EPPORT TO SET FORTH IN INSTALLATION OF PBMS ANTENNAS ON SINGLE POLES THE CONSTRUCTION AND CONTRACT DOCu�ENM THE GAutt� �T (N) NEW SECTION REF. WoRK. CONTRACTORS BIDDING THE JOB ARE HfEV�THH�"6 2 ARRAYS/ 2 ANTENNAS PER ARRAY/4 TOTAL MINOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORS IN THE DRAWINSS AND OR SPEGIFIGATIONS E EXISTING SHALL NOT EV=15E SAID CONTRACTOR FROM COMPLETING THE PRO-IEGT AND INSTALLATION OF ONE COX 18" TUBULAR GPS ANTENNA; IMPROHEMENT5 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTENT OF � DOaMarM- THE O O COAXIAL. CABLE RUNS FROM BTS TO ANTENNAS; BIDDER SHALL SEAR THE RrSPONNOILITY OF NOTIYI OMISSIONS ) � T.O. TOP OF KEYED NOTE ARCH17£-GT/EN51NEEt OF ANY CONFLICTS ERRORS, NEW TELEPHONE SERVICE TO BTS; PRIOR To THE SUBMI5s10N OF CONTRACTORS PROPOSAL IN THE EVeM OF DISCREPANCIEG THE CONTRACTOR 51ALL PRICE THE MORE COSTLY OR (B.T.S.) BASE TRANCEIVER A NEW 100 AMP ELECTRICAL SERVICE TO BTS; EXTI5T151VE WORK, UN1.E5S DIREGTI37 OTHETRYIISE. ELEVATION REF. ONE COMMERCIAL METERING PEDESTAL NOTE SURVEY (G-DRAWINGS ARE A1TACHED 15, coWR GTOR M15T PERFORM HORK DVRINB ONNER5 PRE' HOURS TO STATION FOR REFERENCE ONLY AVOID DISTURBING NORMAL BUSINESS• MAPCONTACTS APPROVALS LAITY Em ,COX CALIFORNIA PCS. INC..: PACIFIC aG1 t MOBILE S�ARCHITECTS 18200 VON KARMAN AVE. 4420 ROSEWOOD DR. BLDG. 2 CARNEY ARCHITECTS C.R. CARNEY TEMPLE AVE. IRVINE, CA. 92612 4th FLOOR 130 S. PROSPECT AVENUE ARCHITECTS, INC. T (714) 623-5000 PLEASANTON, CA. 94588 TUSTIN, CA. 92680 (714) 544-3636 TTI Fl`M1ulINICATiONS P.I ANNING: CCONTTACT: JEFF ROEBUCK 60 TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLANNING: 1, PROPOSED PCS ,;M CONSULTING GROUP; INC. KEITH INTERNATIONAL, INC. FI FCTRICAL ENGINEER•_ 3790 KILROY AIRPORT NAY, STE. 440 22690 CACTUS AVE., SUITE 300 ENGINEERING RESOURCES FILLIPS Y _ NG ?EACH. CA. 908C6 MORENO VALLEY, CA. 92553 E "PHIWPS RANCH" _cNG EACH. C (909) 653-0234 16662 MILLIKAN AVE. 24401 DARRIN DRIVE �10).-CNTACT: SHAWN P. BURKE, P.E. CONTACT: KEN NORTON IRVINE, CA. 92714 DIAMOND BAR, CA. 91765 5 (714) 852-1290 ADAN MADRID, PLANNING REP. CONTACT: BOB KRAMER APFFOVAL SKW-� OF WCWM DRAWLVG� �X � L442- 2 p" FRANK SCHABARUM, SITE AGO. PISS WE 4 L�� STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: ^vA _ aRINT NAME SIGNATURE r,r ,y = •/AGHil RCGRAM AANAG,K ALE SHEET . RANGE, f - . 92666-- 1 NCR7H �l1 / \ / \ � R\ •d7 16 EXI5TIN5 LICIT POLE 11 442bi_—_ IN rRAC r 42564 r1'rbW. 1A94/5-I4. LOT 51 \ pRpPOSED COX PCS 4 PP,MS SITE LOT 66 \ \ LQCAMON PLAN b1'1'k; t1v1"U KiV1AT1ViN 1. A.P.N.: 8281-029-024 2. SEE SURVEY FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION \ 3. PROPOSED PCS FACILITY WILL NO IMPACT ANY EXISTING PARKING 4. EXISTING TREES WILL BE TRIMMED BY A LICENSED ARBORIST IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY ORDINANCES ` EX15TM5 WA111VT T TO BE TRIMMED A6 NEEDED �� \\ EXI5v 6 TREES (TYP. ) TO BE REMOVED PROPOSED LOCATION OF COX ! PSMS EOd1Iffla(' \ e4CLO%RE APD ANTetJA5 FOR�IFMERr LAYOUT EASTIN5 LIGHT POLE PEDeTAL ruWP ` /AND QFBiC I� O Nt(Lumii MI LUtl CASE NO. )ROPRIETARY INFORMA1101 THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT 4MICH RELATES TO COX CALIFORNIA PCS INC.. IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED DRAWN BY: JJR CHECKED BY' CRC ISSUES IN C.R CARAEY \ ARc # 'ECTs, INC. `\\ \ PROPOSED PCS \ \ FACILITY \ "PHIWPS RANCH' 24401 DARRIN DRIVE \ DIAMOND BAR, CA. 91765 \ Graphic Scale COX BITE 4L A267 S0 PSW BETE f L.A402-02 I r r«� t � � Pl�l'11 1 I inch = 50 M � PA�IAL SITE PLAN A-1 9�s 90S 9'S 92 Q / / � A'6• O Iq 5 KEY NOS PHL.IMINAKT Lue OPRIMARY t3A5E TRANSCEIVER STATION (BTS) CASE NO. O PRIMARY POWER CABINET PROPRIETARY INFORMAMONi O BATTER-1- CABINET- THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY O AUXILIARY CABINET BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT VMICH RELATES TO COX OANTENNA GABLE COVM ASSEMBLY CALIFORNIA PCS INC., IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED O6 EXPAN51011 CABINET DRAWN BY: JJR OEXPANSION CABINET ( NOT IN USE CHECKED BY: CRC OEG]JIPMENT PLATPORM-SEE ISSUES STRUCTURAL DRAWIN(S5 DATE DESCRIPTION OCOX CABLES RUN UNDERGROUND 4 1 97 FREJJMINARY LUP (W CONC. BLOCK RET. WALL NOT TO EXCEED 6' H(ST. II 56" WIDE CHAIN LINK FENCE ACCE55 (SATE 2� COX/PBMS LEASE AREA LIMIT LINE ETA ANVINe 1 MTVTO OF 4� CHAIN LINK FENCE , SIZE CRUSHED ROCK WJTHHINALEASE AREA COX TELGO CABINETcp !p` (N) CONGRE I PAD NEW CONCRETE STEP PADS Iq .'COX CPS. ANTENNA ® PBMS BTS MINICABINET 21 p5MS >LE�1NTm ON A MCROFTSFELMOO � ® PBMS EOUIPMENT DISCONNECT SWITCH ® P5M5 TELCO CABINET <e PBMS UNDER6ROUNV CABLES ® COX EojiVMENT 1215C ONNECT SWITCH ® PROPOSED DROUGHT TOLJu¢ANT VEGETATION PROPOSED 15, WIDE COX t PEH5 JOINT ACGE55 EASEMENT ® PROPOSED 41-3'x2'-4"x6" BTS SUB-BA5E CHRI5TY NO. 40 BULL BOX -, C.R CARNEY AF0- CTSi NC. I PROPOSED PCS FACILITY "PHILLIPS RANCH" 24401 DARRIN DRIVE DIAMOND BAR, CA. 91765 cox am f-AW I _ \ \ FWOOR PLAN SCALE: FLOOR PLANS , ��-- E: A-2 V HT. CHAIN LINK FENCE PR.OP05W cox ANTENNA LOCATION CASE NO 1 ELEV. 3 q30' TOP OF SLOPE PROPOSED COX G.P.S. ANTENNA =; pROPO5ED COX AND DBMS EQUIPMENT CABINETS ON NEH CONCRETE SLAB F-LE-,tgll' TOP OF EQUIP. PAD ELEV. 2 gOq.5' MAX F.6. AT UPPER POLE ELEV. i <104' F.G. AT LONER POLE ELEV. t 930' TOP OF SLOPE TOP OF EQUIP. PAD : ?C?.3' MAX F.G. AT UPPER POLE PROPOSED PBM5 ANTENNA LOCATION PROPOSED DROUGHT } v':�i' .;: r.:;r%,'•;11;:� TOLERANT VEGETATION -a �\ ' 1'1"n •:.If •.. t•• ''r �:'i. f< rei', .1 ":.. ,,. J.f,.•� e�:•'•�.J...... �,J •was-,1��:j��^';!^r„ •., _ ".j,, �yy ` S EASL. �T ATION SCALE:=o. PROPOSED DROUGHT TOLERANT VEGETATON ti✓ jf,^ti fy0- �';. •. .fist""�k�%. ;i!✓i: v-'+, �a�s•i• �f�`•f �., ('wad^••�N;�•.�Y^tt .. s�.r' _{;• .f L'�J. -J'!;j :'.'f; l^;. G,11l.J. :'...:., Y,. fr �`�,• •, :1v J. { , '\f,'• Mi'ii•wrJ L I',:• t]' •�] :i1:t - :i_,1.'• '1: :.' :A'i: 'it 1�;.��f, ;,•,t •'�_ .yf, .it: T �•.�•T: .t, .,r,�.. iiy, :i�., • t11��;'t � :. 'y,� sa '� lJ�, 7 �' '•' s. mn mn IIII I II11 1 II!I I IIII I IIII I PROPOSED COX PROP05ED P5M5 ull III I i!I ANTENNA LOCATION ANTENNA LOCATION IIII w r ull', nn I I u rnI u PRoP05ED COX AND PBMS EQUIPMENT I I CABINETS ON NEH CONCRETE 5LA5 F 1 r n I I I I I II II II I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I ! I I !! I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I ! I I 1 1 I I I I I !! I I ! I I I I I I II II I I I IL------�- ----- ------------------ r u'-1 r -1 L _ J L _ J SOUTH WEST ELEVATION I TINFORMATION ASCINHSSETOFCONTRU¶TIN DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO COX CALIFORNIA PCS INC., IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED DRANK BY: JJR CHECKED BY: CRC ISSUES C.R. CARNEY ARCt fiEC`f9, INC. PROPOSED PCS FACILn "Y 'PHIWPS RANCH' 24401 DARRIN DRIVE DIAMOND BAR, CA. 91765 COX BETE 4L.A287 P9�1��51M 1� 4�2-M ELL 7 A-nOf �L1V A_3 -- i PROPOSED COXAND DBS M EQUIPMENT CABIA51NETS ON NEW CONCRETE SLAB PRELIMINARY WF CASE NO - PROPOSED COX ANTENNA LOCATION / :fir`-,�.�'i!i�"i•` A - ELEV. t g30'n �. TOP OF SLOPE \' ` PROP05ED DROUGHT 1*901*05ED PBM5 ANTENNA � , 1 � %\//�\j TOLERANT \/E6ETATION LOCATION ` 6'-o' H&T. CHAIN LINK FENCE ; \ \ ` \ GY 'C/ I •�///•/� PROPOSED CONCRETE BLOCK x I ` RETAINING WALL :....•..,J; � �h syi"•, �` • �V� — _� q. I ELEY, i qli' n .�� i'::� i`�f •.: � „`rr•i•"•.��- `T\Tji I TOP OF EQUIP. PAD �(e?t,..,.SS` ELEV. t gOg3' MAX + Y .,...;.� ..;;: .•:.�.;;, . , :,, .. `; _� <�: r�,:}'�y. ; ,�Yt�T \//��/��i P.O. AT UPPER POLE \.` iA .•i� t y`L' VIP F.C. AT LO}^!ER POLE /.K PROPOSED DBMS ANTENNA LOCATION ELE�/. t q5O. TOP CF SLOPE PROP05ED 'ONCREI STEP PAD5 6'-0y FGT. CHAIN LINK FENCE - N W `T Ls AM 1 /$pALF—op 1 PRoP05ED COX ANTENNA LOCATION i r�,?�ti>:: A� �r,'y�`1 }.*.: i=� psi;' r • %.} J'v`. ' �: , O:A '� J%;� ;; .••• PROP05ED DROUEiHT tri �.� • +-• TOLERANT VEGETATION ,./•` r ^F � `�. 7. .' •n: v+•! } i l 1 '•, ti .r''LJt�''s' ;' rr'.l 6 1 yr:rJ Jr': ;' .. �`��^r �.. '�kj'i•\fir,,' ;`•'� )✓ „•. �•'' ?'il •,�ti=: . h•{� ; 3.�'�•«l.• .., �;. •J ••';� r t .�•%: �n i' ^r :..:X ''S*'•'`k� � '•?.r n I mot•. �, ns'�`•..+N •. ski t' sf�•. "'. •. fTl:/.. yf'7'y: J y,. .:lv :A.iY. •TI-/.. Y''ry•': ., :r 'J Jv �r+„r'=.'ti •a/` �r Ji rr CI,J �. �_:cF.'� .J• f "' .<. J i, ti.�w, •r ,�:t q: �]Y':.' �•�. •S "Wt: C:,":'.• '! t' :'t ^ �5 �j2.,' � � a:; �ti�,•� ' S r.. �� r �.•� y�• i ' t\1'�./r. �.�;li -J �Y'�?ytl`. :. <1.�r1 y.t: ,•1'yyf�/'Wr: \.i��.. ., ✓ r�ti rt''': '! � t: :. • ;��tZi.W�,: ' <' ' }�Jlf it .� *.'S1l1�:�.j�.am: tt.. jet! ; � T. SAY•• :, _ r y.`Y.: "•! •: �) j• FROPOSED COX AND PBMS--__-- EQUIPMEN7 CABINETS ON NE54- _ --' _ - - CONGANDRETE SLAB ------------ FgOPG5ED CONCRETE BLOCK- 5-.ETAININ6 KALL ------ --------- a-EVt qi?' - -�. ----'--'--�. -- - --- - -- TGPGF EQI11P. PAD o __...----•--- -- -----•------- --------�`------ ------------__ . ...., - - ------ ----. . -- ti Y• --- - - .. _. ♦� ��.._ -4'.I 1. .. a.�• - �� .Y _ - .. -- E /. t qOq 3 i —° -- --- Qhl TCP CF UPPER POLE -- - --- _... - _ G�/GF LOWER FOLE NORTH EAST ELENA70N 1,8� V—o" 2 IN THIINFORMATION �SETAOF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO COX CALIFORNIA PCS INC., IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED DRAWN BY: JJR CHECKED BY: CRC ISSUES ml C,R CARPEY AFI'C}'iTECTS, INC. PROPOSED PCS FAaurY 'PHIWPS RANCH' 24401 DARRIN DRIVE DIAMOND BAR,yCA.. 91765 = eL� PSW SM yy 7 ELEVAMONS A-4