HomeMy WebLinkAbout2020.04.24 - Minutes - Special MeetingCITY OF DIAMOND BAR
MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL
SPECIAL MEETING
APRIL 24, 2020
CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Tye called the Special City Council meeting to
order at 10:00 a.m.
Mayor Tye stated that consistent with COVID-19 regulations, all Council Members and
staff are participating via teleconference and there is no physical location for public
attendance. The Public has been invited to join the meeting online or by phone at the
numbers printed on the agenda.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Tye led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL: Council Members Andrew Chou, Ruth Low, Jennifer
"Fred" Mahlke, Mayor Pro Tem Nancy Lyons, and
Mayor Steve Tye
Staff participating telephonically: Dan Fox, City Manager; Ryan McLean, Assistant
City Manager; Anthony Santos, Assistant to the City Manager; David Liu, Director of
Public Works; Marsha Roa, Public Information Manager; Cecilia Arellano, Public
Information Coordinator, and Kristina Santana, City Clerk.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA: As presented.
1. CITY MANAGER REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: NONE
2. PUBLIC COMMENTS:
CC/Santana stated that several comments were submitted by email, each of
which were forwarded to all Councilmembers. Emails were submitted by the
following:
Jason Fu who asked the reason people were being relocated to the Quality Inn in
Rowland Heights and who made such a decision; are California taxpayers paying
for this and who approved the budget; what are the plans for after the Pandemic
is over; and, he expressed support for passing the law making camping or
residing on the street or other public places illegal.
Sandra Gill expressed opposition to Project Roomkey.
Mary Stegemann expressed opposition to Project Roomkey.
Douglas Barcon expressed his concerns regarding this program's impact on the
City, its residents and visitors, and asked the City to oppose state purchasing
and lease agreements with hotels that would suffer from loss of visitor lodging
and businesses from being damaged by the homeless.
APRIL 24, 2020 PAGE 2 CITY COUNCIL
Calvin Cai expressed his concerns about and objections to Project Roomkey and
recommended a less densely populated city be chosen.
Joyce Wong expressed opposition to Project Roomkey.
Oscar Martinez expressed opposition to Project Roomkey because in his opinion,
it puts residents and children at risk.
Eric Fuentes cited opposition to Project Roomkey due to increased transient
traffic, possible abuse of drugs, possible violence toward hotel staff and citizens
of Diamond Bar, possible transmissions of other diseases and the possible
decline of health values.
Josephine expressed opposition to Project Roomkey due to concern for her kids
and for the community.
Jenny Shi expressed opposition to Project Roomkey and asked where the hotel
is located, how the homeless will be managed and what will happen after the
shelter -at-home order is lifted.
CC/Santana then opened the phone line to accept public comment.
Paul Wrightsman said he opposes Project Roomkey in its entirety. He values
clean streets and expressed concerns about unsanitary and peace disturbing
behaviors. He was concerned about the City of Diamond Bar following the
insane public policies on the homeless without question or challenge, and not
serving the needs of the taxpaying citizens of this community.
Bobby Lee said the homeless issue is complicated and complex. His concerns
are regarding safety, cleanliness and keeping his home as safe and secure as
possible. He noted all of the comments are negative and geared toward "not
here" and the Council representing the City should have a fair and open
discussion that addresses how we can help and how this could work.
Joanna expressed support for Project Roomkey as a temporary measure. She
believes with reasonable safeguards, getting the homeless off the street is a
reasonable and compassionate measure and helps keep everyone safe. She
does not believe this is somebody else's problem that can be shoved down the
road to the next community. She would like for the City to be reasonable and
compassionate in dealing with this issue.
Jason Fu agrees with the previous caller that putting the homeless people in a
hotel such as a Quality Inn might be a better temporary solution during the
Pandemic and he would like to know what is planned for the homeless after the
Pandemic and who will make that call. There needs to be an effective and good
solution to dealing with the homeless population long term and he offered
comments regarding possible solutions in his email to the City.
APRIL 24, 2020 PAGE 3 CITY COUNCIL
Adrianne Cotterell noted that it is very important that we bring our best selves
forward and think creatively and be flexible and be open to new ideas and
solutions. If homeless people are housed and safe, it will keep the rest of the
population safe as well. She looks forward to hearing more about the program
and is supportive of making good use of those facilities so that everyone can
enjoy a better life after the Pandemic is over.
Sonya Si said while she wants to help the homeless, but the location is too close
and dangerous because people can come and go and may bring COVID-19 back
to the seniors in the hotel.
John Corsan expressed concerns regarding drug crime, drug violence, drug
trade and all associated problems. These people are from other areas and while
we need to be compassionate, they should be where they belong. He also noted
that the vast majority of residents are not in favor of this and expects their
representatives to resist, postpone, delay, and fight to make sure this does not
happen. He threatened the Councilmembers that if they failed to support the
community against Project Roomkey they would be called out during the next
election.
Sharon agreed with the previous speaker. The governor is trying to spread the
homeless people around and once they are here it will not be easy to remove
them when the pandemic ends. They should be confined where they are now
which is the best solution for Diamond Bar.
Wayne Lee wished the City had reached out to the residents for this public
process. He is strongly against the process of bringing outside homeless people
to Diamond Bar because it would risk the health and safety of the community,
especially to seniors and children.
Jacob Ryan echoed opinions of previous speakers including the gentleman who
plans to post a sign in his yard endorsing Council Members who are protecting
the community and the speaker who mentioned that the County of LA is using
this opportunity as an excuse to spread the problem to neighboring cities. He
expreseed concerns that they would not adhere to social distancing and other
safety regulations. He is totally against Project Roomkey and asked Council
Members to reject this proposal.
Allen Liu wished this hearing could have happened before the decision was
made to move homeless people into the City of Diamond Bar community area.
He was concerned about how the residents be removed once the pandemic is
over and how can we make sure the people are not on the street using public
resources where kids play. He does not believe that the area between Rowland
Heights and Diamond Bar is a solution and he does not believe it is right for
residents to bear this cost. He echoed a previous speaker who said they would
pay attention to who protects the City and who will be re-elected.
Trisha Tran thanked the City for having this meeting to address this issue and get
APRIL 24, 2020 PAGE 4 CITY COUNCIL
the community involved. MPT/Lyons posted a lot of information on the internet
last night which is how she learned of today's meeting. She does not like to
make decisions before she hears all of the facts and she is confident that M/Tye
will answer questions about where these folks will end up once this is over. She
cannot pick sides because while she is compassionate about the homeless, she
is also compassionate about the City in which she lives and doesn't want the
streets to be flooded with folks who will be sleeping all over the place and does
not want to see the crime rate increase.
Jenny thanked the City for having this meeting and allowing everyone to express
their views. She is against the project to bring the homeless to the City of
Diamond Bar. She has heard the homeless are already in the hotel and they can
leave the hotel from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. without wearing masks which is unfair
to the residents. They are too close to the shopping malls and residences. She
asked when this pandemic is over, how will the City handle the homeless
situation and indicated she does not believe there is a solution to take the
homeless back where they were before coming to this area.
Pamela said that she has read that 75 percent of the cost will come from FEMA
and who knows where the other 25 percent comes from. Another concern is
whether these individuals are sick or not sick because it says they are hoping to
use this as a place where the people can be quarantined for 7 or 14 days if
needed. Taking a person who is used to living outdoors and putting them
indoors and telling them they have to stay there seems difficult. She agrees with
everyone who is opposed to Project Roomkey.
Steven Chen said he does not agree with Project Roomkey because the location
of the project was next to a highly populated area. He believes that crime rate
will increase and COVID-19 will get more serious. He suggested the homeless
be moved to the City of Commerce which has a lower population density. The
homeless have rights within the law, but we need to protect the citizens of
Diamond Bar and Walnut, too.
Curt Tong agreed with the previous speaker and said he was thinking back to
2018 when they removed the homeless camps in the Santa Ana River along with
400 tons of debris that included metal and hazardous waste. He indicated this is
a nice quiet area and the economy is much better than downtown LA and the
homeless would have very little incentive to go back. There are so many schools
near the hotel and it is a heavily clustered residential area (Walnut, Diamond Bar,
Chino Hills) and this area is ill-equipped to deal with this issue. Also, he
imagines it will be difficult to evict people who do not pay rent and do not care
about the law.
M/Tye closed the Public Comment portion of the meeting.
3. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION:
3.1 PROJECT ROOMKEY
APRIL 24, 2020 PAGE 5 CITY COUNCIL
CM/Fox stated that Project Roomkey is an initiative established by
Governor Newsom, the idea of which is to move the homeless individuals
that are the most vulnerable to COVID-19 off of the streets and into hotel
rooms to prevent the spread of the virus and save lives. Los Angeles
Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA) began implementing this program
throughout Los Angeles County, not just in this area. A list frequently
asked questions (FAQ) prepared by the County was attached to the staff
report and helps explain the program in more detail. The City learned that
the County entered into a contract with the Quality Inn in Rowland
Heights, located at Fairway Drive and SR60 within the unincorporated
area of LA County and not within the City of Diamond Bar. The program is
raising a lot of questions up and down the state and the staff report also
includes a number of questions that are being asked by officials across LA
County. Many of these questions and responses are being coordinated
through the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG),
Contract Cities Associations and the City Manager's Group as well as,
individual Council Members. At this time, it is recommended that the
Council discuss the matter and provide any direction as deemed
appropriate.
Ivan Sulic, Homeless and Housing Deputy for Supervisor Janice Hahn,
thanked the Council and public for inviting him to participate in this
discussion. It is his job to coordinate all homeless projects including
Project Roomkey throughout the supervisorial district which extends from
Diamond Bar to Marina del Rey. Project Roomkey, the governor's
initiative, is for our most vulnerable, at -risk homeless individuals who are
over the of 65 and/or have underlying health issues such as asthma, heart
disease, cancer, missing limbs — individuals that should they contract
COVID-19, would surely die on the street, and we want to make sure we
move these individuals into some of these underutilized hotel and motel
rooms throughout the state and throughout the county. Hotel and motel
retention within the County of Los Angeles has gone down over 70
percent which puts many of these businesses, many of which are
franchisee and family owned hotels and motels, at risk of not only losing
their business, but losing local jobs and local tax revenue that would
potentially go back into the communities.
Mr. Sulic said that the County of Los Angeles is not bringing people to
Diamond Bar. Currently, there are no sites identified in Diamond Bar, but
should there be one, individuals will be coming from the service planning
Area 3 which is the San Gabriel Valley and potentially from the Diamond
Bar area as well. These individuals go through a robust health screening
prior to going inside and while they are going through a health screening
and talking to a caseworker, their items are checked through for guns,
knives, drugs and other types of substances that are not allowed inside
the hotel/motel. Once the check has been completed, their items are put
in a "hot" box and while within the hot box, all fleas, bed bugs and other
APRIL 24, 2020 PAGE 6 CITY COUNCIL
pests are killed. There is a nurse and a Certified Nurse's Assistant (CNA)
on staff, there is 24/7 private security on site as well as, caseworkers on
site. For the Quality Inn site, the provider is Volunteers of America who
have staff onsite 24/7. In addition, the Department of Mental Health has
robust outreach teams that are connected to each individual site who are
on 24/7 call who will provide de-escalation and/or intervention needed.
Each of the individuals are checked twice daily by the Nurse and CNA on
staff. This is not a COVID-19 quarantine site. These sites are used to
make sure these individuals do not get COVID-19 and do not impact
hospitals and do not impact the potential safety of the community. In
addition, these residents are provided three meals a day and recreation
such as television and games to minimize their going out into the
community. Clients are expected to respect the same stay-at-home
orders that the general public should be respecting also. This program
also pays the local TOT (Transient Occupancy Tax) in each municipality.
This project is contracted for only three months but there is the ability to
extend it for an additional month in case the stay-at-home orders are
extended and to give the program some flexibility as individuals are being
transitioned to different types of housing options including other types of
shelter, prioritized for permanent supportive housing, or receiving a
subsidy such as Section 8 or veterans housing.
M/Tye asked how many homeless have been located to Marina del Rey.
Mr. Sulic responded there is not currently a project in Marina del Rey and
there is a project at Dockweiler. There are projects opening in Redondo
Beach, Long Beach, Lomita, San Pedro and others areas daily depending
on the negotiations between the state and the counties.
M/Tye said he believed that part of the problem was things were changing
so rapidly with programs such as Project Roomkey and that no one from
Diamond Bar, Walnut or Rowland Heights was notified until after the fact.
C/Mahlke asked if the eligible population is either 65 and potential health
risks or 65 or potential health risks.
Mr. Sulic responded that it is 65 and/or so there could be an individual
who is over the age of 65 and have an underlying health condition or just
be a healthy 65 or older individual. There is an instance of a 44 year old
who recently suffered a stroke and had a flesh -eating disease in the brain
and while that person is not over the age of 65, they have a severe
underlying health condition that should they get coronavirus on the street
would be most at risk of passing away. There are possibilities of younger
individuals but only if they have severe health issues that could put them
at risk for the disease.
C/Mahlke asked if they anticipated having anyone under the age of 18
APRIL 24, 2020 PAGE 7 CITY COUNCIL
participate in this program.
Mr. Sulic responded "no" since this is not a family facility.
C/Mahlke asked the opening date for the local Quality Inn project.
Mr. Sulic responded that it opened Monday of last week.
C/Mahlke asked who would decide if there was a one-month extension on
that facility and who would be notified.
Mr. Sulic responded that the County would make that decision and the
individuals notified would be the coordinating council of that
unincorporated area. If it was an independent city it would be the City
Council of that independent city. The reason Diamond Bar was not
informed was because it was outside of the city's boundaries. The
Rowland Heights Coordinating Council was notified because they are the
governing body of the unincorporated area where the facility is located.
C/Mahlke asked if the Rowland Heights Coordinating Council would have
the option to say yes or no to the extension.
Mr. Sulic said that the Rowland Heights Coordinating Council would not
have that option and the County would inform them if there were to be an
extension.
C/Chou asked what options do the hotel owners have to either accept or
reject the offer from the county.
Mr. Sulic responded that they have the ability to accept or reject. LAHSA
is not doing such things as imposing eminent domain or takeover of the
hotel/motel without their permission. The owners have the ultimate
decision over what happens at their facility.
C/Low asked what the process is when a person is determined to be
positive for COVID-19.
Mr. Sulic stated that immediately, if a nurse, assistant or staff member
deems an individual to be showing symptoms, the individual is required to
be quarantined in their room. The nurse will do a screening and if the
nurse determines that the individual is showing symptoms, the nurse will
call public health and public health will send a team to the location to
transfer out of the location to a hospital or local testing site in Pomona or
Bell Gardens if the public health officials determine that the individual is
positive for COVID-19.
C/Low asked how the individuals housed at the Rowland Heights Quality
Inn are selected to be in that location and how people agree to the
APRIL 24, 2020 PAGE 8 CITY COUNCIL
conditions to be self -quarantined and to remain in the area.
Mr. Sulic responded that within the HMIS (Homeless Management
Information System) and CES (Coordinated Entry System), the majority of
the individuals have been pre -identified within the system and through the
outreach efforts within the SPA (Service Planning Area) and the project is
seeking individuals solely within the surrounding area and in particular in
the San Gabriel surrounding area to the Project Roomkey site.
Individuals are provided wristbands and HMIS cards with their picture that
can be scanned. In addition, local law enforcement agencies are provided
with a list of clients and staff should they need to respond to the site. If
individuals do not abide by the rules they are moved out of the facility. To
date, there have been no issues at the Quality Inn where there are three
or four security guards. He visited last weekend at 8:00 p.m. which is
curfew and everyone was in their room and accounted for and it was quiet.
C/Low asked how many people are left in the database that are still
requiring shelter.
Mr. Sulic said that out of the 60,000 that are in the LA County LAHSA
system, 15,000 have been identified countywide that could fall into the
categories for the program, which is why the county is trying to lease as
many rooms as possible to address the need. Currently, there are slightly
more than 2,500 countywide and the goal is to procure a total of 10,000
rooms within LA County.
C/Low asked if Project Roomkey had an exit plan.
Mr. Sulic responded that as of this time there is no exit plan. The
pandemic has pushed this to move forward in such an expeditious manner
and as Project Roomkey began, Supervisor Hahn and Mark Ridley
Thomas had the same concerns about an exit strategy. Week before last,
Supervisor Hahn introduced a motion requesting that from 30 days from
that point the project come up with a comprehensive plan to make sure
that these individuals who are in our care are moved into their second step
whether it be that they are put back into a shelter, prioritized for housing
and work toward getting subsidies to make certain we can get them into
apartments or shared living facilities.
C/Low asked what the county has done in the way of outreach to the local
cities,do cities participate in creating an exit plan, do they have input, and
are the cities informed. Diamond Bar was not in receipt of any outreach
other than what has been in the newspaper which is not acceptable.
Mr. Sulic said he has been hearing that from other communities as well
and they are trying to do better. The first city that was launched for Project
Roomkey was the City of Lomita and that city found out the day before it
was opened. And this was happening countywide and we are working to
APRIL 24, 2020 PAGE 9 CITY COUNCIL
make sure that we are giving cities timely heads up and working with the
Council of Governments on an exit plan. He is unaware of any city
participating in an exit plan but he will bring that issue up and make it a
priority at his next homeless committee meeting with his team and
LAHSA.
M/Tye stated that as he became aware of Project Roomkey, he has driven
by the Quality Inn a couple of times and when he drives by in the front,
everything Mr. Sulic has said looks to be true. There are a couple of
tables out front. He saw one security guard, not four. M/Tye asked Mr.
Sulic if he walked the property.
Mr. Sulic responded that he visited the site on Friday and walked inside
and checked with the service provider and they stated that all of their
clients were inside.
M/Tye asked if Mr. Sulic walked from the curb around to the back.
Mr. Sulic said he did not.
M/Tye said the safeguards are leaky and if even 10 percent of the people
are asymptomatic and they are outside and not practicing social
distancing, who is going to tell them to do it. He pointed out that Mr. Sulic
did not see the entire situation because he did not walk the entire
property.
M/Tye said it is very troubling to hear that there is no exit plan. The
problem is that yes, things are moving very quickly and this is moving so
fast and so carelessly that things are overlooked. The San Gabriel Valley
is a big area. He does not know how many people are housed in the
Quality Inn, but he guarantees there are not that number of homeless
people in Diamond Bar, Walnut and Rowland Heights, a population of over
100,000, that would have been available to fill the Quality Inn.
C/Mahlke said she was curious about the employees working at the
Quality Inn. Once the hotel opted into this program, what happened to
ensure that the hotel employees are being protected and how is the
county making sure they are being taken care of as well?
Mr. Sulic explained that all of the sites had access to personal protective
equipment (PPE). For the most part, each site varies. He is not certain
what staff is being provided at the Quality Inn; however, all staff are
provided PPE and in addition, all clients are provided face masks.
MPT/Lyons asked if Mr. Sulic had the homeless count for Diamond Bar for
this year and last year.
Mr. Sulic said while he does not have the number he knows it is very low,
APRIL 24, 2020 PAGE 10 CITY COUNCIL
extremely low like 10.
MPT/Lyons said the homeless count for Diamond Bar in January 2020
was four individuals and last year in January the homeless count was four
individuals. In Walnut, the homeless count this year was eight and last
year it was four. She is sure that Rowland Heights has a few homeless as
well, but it seems to her that this area is being unfairly and unduly
burdened with this project being located here. A number of people have
asked her why the project is not confined to a more industrial area rather
than a residential area and from what she has heard, it sounds like it is up
to a hotel operator that wants to have the revenue.
Mr. Sulic said that was correct along with site availability. At this point,
they are looking to every site that might be available to Project Roomkey.
MPT/Lyons asked Mr. Sulic to verify that he had not negotiated with any
hotels inside the City of Diamond Bar
Mr. Sulic said he believed the county and state are negotiating locally but
they are nowhere near final negotiations and until it gets to final
negotiations he is not at liberty to disclose which hotels are part of the
negotiations.
MPT/Lyons responded it sounds like Diamond Bar will find out once the
negotiations are done.
Mr. Sulic said no, cities will be notified once negotiations get to their final
stages. As he mentioned earlier with the situation in Torrance where it
caused a stir and in the end it did not happen, they are trying to deter that
— not only for the protection of the hotel owner, but to make sure there is
no misinformation going into the community and causing unnecessary
concerns and angst.
MPT/Lyons asked if there had been any calls for law enforcement to visit
the Quality Inn since the program's inception.
Mr. Sulic said that to his knowledge, the only Sheriff's calls that happened
was where they were asked to respond to potential protests or to incidents
of residents stopping in the middle of the road, getting out of the car with
their cameras and walking over to the hotel to take photos when some of
the clients were outside. To his knowledge, there have been no incidents
where the Sheriff was called because of something the clients did but he
will check and get back with staff on that issue.
MPT/Lyons asked if the clients were being screened for criminal
background prior to admission.
Mr. Sulic said he did not believe so because he believes all tier one sites
and shelters are "low barrier" shelters. Especially within the pandemic,
APRIL 24, 2020 PAGE 11 CITY COUNCIL
they do not want to discriminate. Because this is a temporary attempt to
curb the pandemic for the homeless community, he believes no
background checks are being done but he will check on that.
MPT/Lyons asked if potentially, a felon could be assigned to one of these
facilities.
Mr. Sulic responded potentially, yes.
MPT/Lyons said for her there are two big areas of concern: 1) the entry
plan and 2) the exit plan. She does not believe the county is doing a very
good job of letting the cities know ahead of time what is going on. She is
the City of Diamond Bar's representative to the Council of Governments
which held a meeting last week about this matter. There was a LAHSA
representative who spoke during the meeting and two cities, South EI
Monte and Covina that both found out about the shelter's opening the day
they opened. MPT/Lyons said she wanted Mr. Sulic's assurance that
Diamond Bar would get notice so that if Diamond Bar is selected this
project can be tightened up.
Mr. Sulic responded to MPT/Lyons that Diamond Bar has his commitment
as the Homeless Deputy as well as, the commitment of his office that
should a site be selected and negotiations appear to lead to a contract
signature, his first call and that of his Field Deputy Loren Yokomizo's first
call will be to Diamond Bar.
MPT/Lyons wanted to know how many days prior to the opening that call
would take place
Mr. Sulic said that on average, a contract is signed four to five days prior
to the selection of a provider and then it takes another three days until the
facility opens so about a week to a week and a half after signing the City
Council would be notified.
M/Tye said that the Council thinks there is a facility in Diamond Bar that
Project Roomkey/LAHSA is talking to and MPT/Lyons wanted to know that
if when the negotiations were done the Council would be informed.
Mr. Sulic responded that the Council would be notified before negotiations
are completed.
M/Tye said that Mr. Sulic's statement means a contract is going to be
signed and Mr. Sulic is letting the City Council know that Diamond Bar is
now past the stage of talking about the details and it's a done deal and
notification is after the fact.
Mr. Sulic reiterated that no councils are being given that decision.
M/Tye said that 31 years ago Diamond Bar became a City because we
APRIL 24, 2020 PAGE 12 CITY COUNCIL
were tired of LA County making decisions for it. So that is certainly
something Mr. Sulic needs to take back to Supervisor Hahn.
C/Low asked if she heard Mr. Sulic say that once the county and the
hotel/motel make a deal, there is nothing the City Council or the City of
Diamond Bar can do about it.
Mr. Sulic said there are always things that can be done, but the question
that was posed was, does the city have a decision or right of refusal to say
yes or no, and from the county's side, the answer is no. As an example,
the City of Norwalk implemented a moratorium on Tuesday saying that
none of their businesses can be utilized for a purpose without city
approval and the moment that happened, the county issued an Executive
Order commencing with litigation because the county believes those
actions are illegal — an attempt to stop the Executive Order of the State of
California and the county for implementing the Executive Order. The
county is suing Norwalk because this is a matter of saving lives.
MPT/Lyons said she understands about Norwalk and heard that
Lawndale's city attorney sent a letter stating that if the hotel owner did not
break the lease by the next day a hearing would be called to consider the
hotel's operating permit.
Mr. Sulic said that was true.
MPT/Lyons said she believed cities were coming out with creative ways
against these facilities.
Mr. Sulic said that MPT/Lyons was correct and that Bell Gardens was
doing something similar and he believes Bellflower was looking at putting
in a measure or ordinance saying that no city resources could be incurred
for implementation of this project. So there are cities that are taking
different and unique acts depending on the situation and council.
C/Chou thanked Mr. Sulic for participating. He believes Mr. Sulic can hear
in everyone's voice how concerned the City Council is as local
government officials in terms of losing control and the ability to safeguard
things this Council deems to be important. With respect to Mr. Sulic's
comment that cities do not have veto power, consider hypothetically that a
city is forced into complying, what resources would the county or the state
be willing to give to help the City to increase enforcement by hiring
additional security or set up perimeters and use additional staff resources
to monitor the site?
Mr. Sulic said that the county would incur costs for additional security or
staff. Currently, there is no pot of money via the state or county for those
types of items through the city at this time. There can be a conversation.
Supervisor Hahn appreciates Diamond Bar and wants to work with the
APRIL 24, 2020 PAGE 13 CITY COUNCIL
City to mitigate as many issues as possible.
C/Mahlke asked Mr. Sulic if he could let Diamond Bar know about the
Comprehensive Exit Plan meeting so the City could participate.
Mr. Sulic said of course he would do that.
C/Mahlke asked when it is scheduled to be discussed and how would the
City be invited to participate in that discussion.
Mr. Sulic said that discussions have just started. Every Monday and
Wednesday the board deputies meet with the head of Emergency
Management, LAHSA and Homeless Mission and he will be sure to bring
up the city's wish to be involved in the exit strategy. He will then be in
touch with CM/Fox with the assistance of his Field Deputy Loren
Yokomizo and make sure that Diamond Bar is at the table.
C/Mahlke asked if these would be public meetings.
Mr. Sulic said the Homeless staff meetings are not public meetings. There
is one public meeting every other Thursday of the month but the meetings
on Mondays and Wednesdays are not public meetings. While they are not
public meetings, he will see if there is a way to include Diamond Bar.
M/Tye said he does not take kindly to a state directive that changes the
complexion of Diamond Bar and he does not take kindly to the county
falling in lock step with that state directive. Everyone is concerned about
an exit strategy that doesn't exist because he sees the county going to the
Quality Inn or any other location and saying okay, the pandemic is done,
glad everybody survived, time to move out and now the ACLU steps in
and says hold on. The issues that have not been thought through are
myriad and huge for Diamond Bar. He feels that the solution cannot be
worse than the problem and he thinks that's where we are headed. But he
knows that we are all in this together and that means we have to come up
with solutions, and he advised that Diamond Bar will do what is in the best
interest of Diamond Bar.
CM/Fox stated that staff has listened carefully and understands the
Council's intent to participate in an exit strategy which staff anticipates
being involved with and staff will do its due diligence in keeping Council
informed and make sure there is a plan moving forward when this
pandemic comes to an end.
MPT/Lyons suggested that CM/Fox prepare a letter for the Mayor's
signature to Supervisor Hahn, Mr. Sulic and other involved parties to get
the Council's concerns on the record in writing.
C/Low agreed that would be her recommendation as well.
APRIL 24, 2020 PAGE 14 CITY COUNCIL
C/Chou said that the City's government is primarily for the safety and
health of Diamond Bar residents. As a part of this greater community, he
has heard a lot of comments and assumptions about the homeless
population and feels it is not for Council or residents to judge how they
came to be homeless, but to be concerned about how this City can deal
with this if and when they do come to the City. In discussing this, he
would appreciate the narrative to criminalize and vilifying the homeless
population to be toned down and the focus to be on a solution.
M/Tye responded that the state and county are throwing money at an
issue before they know what the problem is and his concern is the well-
being of the City of Diamond Bar and let's do what we can where we are.
C/Mahlke likes the idea of staff composing a letter which she believes is
important and a little bit of what C/Chou said as well, that it is important to
focus on solution orientation and in the same way Diamond Bar residents
are trying to hold the Council accountable, it is important to hold the
county accountable for the way in which they are rolling out this program.
She empathizes with the time constraints but is deeply concerned about
the county's ability to run this program as tightly as they are saying they
can and of course, with no exit strategy, that is the level of accountability
that makes this look less and less like Diamond Bar can control what is
happening at the Quality Inn let alone trying to attempt to consistently hold
them accountable. She is sure the City will learn more going forward as to
the City's ability to control what happens with the City limits. She hopes
the focus is on the City holding the county accountable for the ways in
which they can impact this City with this project as well as, other projects.
C/Low said that homelessness is a complicated problem. If it were not so,
the problem would have been solved already. Diamond Bar has to be part
of the solution and demonstrate compassion while at the same time be
focused on the safety and well-being of this community and its residents.
Diamond Bar has to hold the county accountable to what they need to do
and be part of that solution. She urged the Council to take a proactive role
in putting together an exit strategy. She supports the idea of a letter so
that this Council is on record about its concerns and want to do what is
right for the City as well as for the county.
M/Tye said he has issues with there being no exit plan and no screening
for criminal records which would be very helpful in determining how much
security is needed. He thinks there needs to be a letter written and the
Council's thoughts and concerns need to be memorialized. He is not at all
comfortable that negotiations are going on with a facility in Diamond Bar.
The letter should go forward in the strongest terms possible.
M/Tye said that regarding one public comment, if the Council was currying
favor from the county it would not be having this meeting and would
APRIL 24, 2020 PAGE 15 CITY COUNCIL
certainly not be taking any action. A couple of people commented about
making this a campaign issue. We have to deal with this today and the
campaign will take place in September/October/November and whether or
not it becomes a campaign issue has never influenced him one way or the
other.
M/Tye said he heard from at least one speaker that they only found out
about this meeting 30 minutes before the phone call. Anyone who
participated in the Tuesday night's Council meeting on April 21St knows
that this meeting was requested that evening and was duly noticed, as
required by state law, that this would be taking place. As usual, this City
does everything possible to keep the public informed.
MPT/Lyons thanked CM/Fox for putting this meeting together so quickly
and for getting Ivan Sulic to participate. Whereas someone complained
that they were not given enough notice, this was an urgent matter and she
hopes whoever was unable to participate can feel free to send emails
and/or letters to the City with their thoughts.
CM/Fox confirmed to M/Tye that staff had direction from the Council to
move forward to craft the letter with and for the Mayor to sign that can be
sent out in the next couple of days.
M/Tye took liberty to speak on behalf of the entire Council using his
favorite Abraham Lincoln quote: "We do the very best we can, the very
best we know how and we need to keep on doing so until the end. If the
end brings us out okay, what's said against us won't matter. If the end
brings us out wrong, 10,000 angels swearing we were right would do no
good". In closing, this Council needs to keep on doing what we think is
right until the end and we will see where it goes from here.
ADJOURNMENT: With no further business to conduct, M/Tye adjourned the
Special City Council Meeting at 12:13 p.m.
Respectfully submitted:
Kri tins Santana, City Clerk
Thejore�oing mi r
are hereby approved this 19th day of May, 2020.
Steve Tye, Mayor