The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About11/26/2002 PLANNING F�E �oPY COMMISSION A �ENDA November 26 , 2002 7 : 00 P.M. Suuth Coast Air Quality Management District ' Auditorium 21865 East Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA Chairman Joe Ruzicka Vice Chairman Steve Tye Commissioner Steven Nelson Commissioner Dan Nolan Commissioner Jack Tanaka _ Copies of staff reports or other written documentation relating to agenda items are on file in the Planning Division of the Dept. of Community & Development Services, located at 21825 E. Copley Drive, and are available tor public inspection. If you have questions regarding an agenda item, please call (909) 396-5676 during regular business hours. In an effort to comply with the requirements of Title ll of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the City of Diamond Bar requires that any person in need of any type of special equipment, assistance or accommodation(s) in order to communicate at a City public meeting must inform the Dept. of Community & Development Services at (909) 396-5676 a minimum of 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting. � �,�° Please refrain irom smoking, eating or The City of Diamond Bar uses recyGed paper drinking in the Auditorium and encourages you to do the same City of Diamond Baz Planning Cominission MEETING RULES PUBLICINPUT The meetings of the Diamond Bar Planning Commission are open to the public. A member of the public may address the Comrnission on the subject of one or more agenda items and/or other items of which aze within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Diamond Bar Planning Commission. A request to address the Commission should be submitted in writing at the public hearing, to the Secretary of the Commission. As a general rule, the opportunity for public comments will take place at the discretion of the Chair. However, in order to facilitate the meeting, persons who are interested parties for an item may be requested to give their presentation at the time Lbe item is called on the calendar. The Chair may limit individual public input to five minutes on any item; or the Chair may limit the total amount of time allocated for public testimony based on the number of people rsquesting to speak and the business of the Commission. Individuals are requested to conduct themselves in a professional and businesslike manner. Comments and questions are welcome so that all points of view are considered prior to the Commission making recommendations to the staff and City Council. In accordance with State Law (Brown Act), all matters to be acted on by the Commission must be posted at least 72 hours prior to the Commission meeting. In case of emergency or when a subject matter azises subsequent to the posting of the agenda, upon making certain findings, the Commission may act on item that is not on the posted agenda. INFORMATION RELATING TO AGENDAS AND ACTIONS OF THE COMMISSION Agendas for Diamond Bar Planning Coaunission meetings aze prepared by the Planning Division of the Community and Development Services Department. Agendas are available 72 hours prior to the meeting at City Hall and the public library, and may be accessed by personal computer at the number below. Every meeting of the Planning Commission is recorded on casse[te tapes and duplicate tapes aze available for a nominal chazge. ADA REOUIREMENTS A cordless microphone is available for those persons with mobility impairments who cannot access the public speaking area. The service of the wrdless microphone and sign language interpreter services are available by giving notice at least three business days in advance of the meeting. Piease telephone (909) 396-5676 between 7: 30 a.m. and 5 : 30 p.m. , Monday through Thursday, and 730 a.m. and 430 p.m. , Friday. HELPFUL PAONE NUMBERS Copies of Agenda, Rutes of the Commission, Cassette Tapes of Meetings (909) 396-5676 Computer Access to Agendas (909) 860-LINE General Agendas (909) 396-5676 email: info@ci .diamond-bar.ca.us Next Resolution No. 2002-46 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, November 26, 2002 AGENDA CALL TO ORDER : 7: 00 p . m . PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE : ' 1 . ROLL CALL: COMMISSIONERS : Chairman Joe Ruzicka, Vice-Chairman Steve Tye , Steve Nelson , Dan Nolan , and Jack Tanaka. - � 2. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS : This is the time and place for the general public to address the members of the Planning Commission on any item that is within their jurisdiction , allowing the public an opportunity to speak on non-public hearing and non-agenda items . Please complete a Speaker's Card for the recordinq Secretary (Completion of this form is voluntary ) There is a five-minute maximum time limit when addressina the Planninq Commission . . , � . � � . 3. APPROVA� OF AGENDA: Chairman . 4. CONSENT CALENDAR : The following items listed on the consent calendar are considered routine and are - approved by a single motion . Consent calendar items may be removed from the - agenda by request of the Commission only: 4. 1 Minutes of Regular Meeting : November 12 , 2002 . 5. OLD BUSINESS : None . 6. NEW BUSINESS : None . 7. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING(S): 7. 1 Develoament Review No. 2002-03 (pursuant to Code Sections 22 .48. 020.A. ) is a request to construct a two-story office buiiding of approximately 25 ,000 square feet on a vacant lot within Gateway Corporate Center. (Continued from October 22 , 2002) Project Address : 2i671 E . Gateway CenterDrive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 November 26 , 2002 Page 2 PLANNING COMMISSION Property Owner: Acbar Omar 222 N . Sunset Avenue West Covina, CA 91790 Applicant: Southwest Design 720i Haven Avenue , Suite E-309 , Alta Loma, CA 91701 Environmental Determination : Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) , Section 15070, the City has determined that a Negative Declaration is required for this project. Negative Declaration No. " 2002-RS has been prepared . The Negative Declaration' s review period began October 1 , 2002, and ended October 20, 2002. Recommendation: In accordance with appiicanYs request, staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue Development Review No. 2002-03 to December 10, 2002 , 8. PUBLIC HEARING(S): 8. 1 Development Review No. 2002-30/Minor Conditionai Use Permit No. 2002-15 (pursuant to Code Sections 22 .48 .020 , 22.56, and 22 . 68j is a request to remodel and add approximately 842 square feet to an existing 1 ,690 square fieet fegal non-confiorming single famiiy residence with two car garage. Additionally, the applicant requests approval of a Minor Conditional Use Permit to allow for the continuation of a legal nonconforming 7'4" side yard setback distance . Project Address : 21216 Cold Spring Lane (Lot 3 , Tract 25985) Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Property Owner: Hone-Man Le 21216 Coid Spring Lane Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Applicant: Bao L. Nguyen 21216 Cold Spring Lane Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Environmental Determination: Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) , Section 15301 (e) , the City has determined that this project is Categorically Exempt. November 26 , 2002 Page 3 PLANNING COMMISSION Recommendation : Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review No . 2002-30/Minor Conditionai Use Permit No . 2002- 15 , Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval as listed within the draft resolution. 9. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS : 10. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS : 1U.1 Public Nearina dates for future proiects. 11 . SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: ' THANKSGNING HOLIDAY: In observance of the 7hanksgiving Holiday, City offices will be closed Thursday, November 28, and Friday, November 29 , 2002 . City offices will reopen on Monday, December 2, 2002 HOLIDAY RIDE : November 29 2002 - January 2 , 2003 Free io afl residents 1 S years and oider (children under 18 must be accompanied by an adult.) Please call 1 -800-578-6555 for pick up CITY COUNCIL MEETING : Tuesday, December 3 , 2002 — 6 :30 p. m . AQMDfGovt. Center Auditorium 21865 E. Copley Drive ADMINISTRATfVE REVIEW : 'fuesday, December 10, 2002 — 6 : 00 p. m . AQMD/Govt. Center Auditorium 21865 E. Copley Drive PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, December 10, 2002 — 7:00 p .m. MEETING : AQMD/Govt. Center Auditorium 21865 E. Copley Drive TRAFFIC AND Thursday, December 12 , 2002 — 7:00 p. m . TRANSPORTATiON AQMD/Govt. Center Hearing Board Room COMMISSION MEETING : 21865 E. Copley Drive November 26 , 2002 Page 4 PLANNING COMMISSION WINTER SNOW FEST: Saturday, December 14 2002 - 10: 00 a. m . to 4 : 00 p. m . Pantera Park, 738 Pantera Drive PARKS AND RECREATION Thursday, December 19 , 2002 — 7:00 p . m . COMMISSION MEETING : AQMD/Govt. Center Hearing Board Room 21865 E. Copley Drive� CHRISTMAS HOLIDAY: In observance of the Christmas Holiday, City offices will be closed Tuesday, _ December 24 , 2002 , and Wednesday, - December 25 , 2002 . City offices will reopen on Thursday, .December 26 , 2002 . NEW YEAR'S HOLIDAY: In observance of the New Year's Holiday, City offices will be closed Wednesday, January 1 , 2003 . City offices will reopen on Thursday, January 2, 2002 . CHRISTMAS TREE December 26 , 2002 , through January 10 , RECYCLING PROGRAM : 2003 . Piace tree at curbside on regular trash pick up day for disposal . CITY-SPONSORED December 26, 2002, to January 17, 2003 - ELECTRONIC WASTE Free removal of TV's , VCR Monitors, CD PICK UP: Players , Telephones , Radios , etc. Cali 1 -800-449-7587 12. ADJOURNMENT: � � �. � � NIINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLAIVNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 12, 2002 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Ruzicka called the meeting to order at 7 :01 p.m. in the South Coast Air Quality ManagemenUGovemment Center Auditorium, 21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Baz, California 91765 . , PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE : ' Vice Chairman Tye led the pledge of allegiance. 1. ROLL CALL : Present: Chairman Joe Ruzicka, Vice Chairman Steve Tye, and ' Commissioners Steve Nelson, Dan Nolan and Jack Tanaka. Also Present: 7ames DeStefano, Deputy City Manager, Ann Lungu, Associate Planner, Linda Smith , Development Services Assistant, Stella Marquez, Administrative Assistant; Dave Meyer and Milan Gazrison, LDM Associates. 2. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS : None Offered. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: As presented. 4. CONSENT CALENDAR: - 4.1 Minutes of Study Session of November 12, 2002. C/`I'anaka moved, C/Nolan seconded, to approve the Study Session Minutes of October 8 , 2002, as presented. Without objection, the motion was so ardered. 4.2 Minutes of Regular Meeting of October 22, 2002. C/Nolan moved, C/T'anaka seconded, to approve the Regular Meeting minutes of October 22, 2002. as presented. Without objection, the motion was so ordered. 5. OLD BU5INESS : None � � � � � NOVEMBER 12, 2002 Page 2 PLANNING COMMISSION 6. NEW BUSINESS : 6.1 Presentation by Barbara Shutl, Executive Director of the Fair Housing Foundation — Overview of Services — Continued to a future date to be determined. 7. PUBLIC HEARING(S): 71 Develonment Review No. 2002-09, Minor Conditional Use Permit 2002-09, and Tree Permit No. 2002-07. Pursuant to Chapters 22.48 , 22. 56 and 2238 of the Diamond Bar Development Code, the applicant has requested approval of plans to remodel and construct an approximate 4,743 squaze foot addition to an existing 4,902 square foot three (3) story single-family resident to total 9,645 squaze feet of combined gross floor azea (including covered porches, balconies, patios and a 5-car garage) . The project also includes a detached covered patio structure, swimming pool , tennis court and retaining walls with a maximum exposed height of six feet. Additionally, the applicant requests approval of a Minor Conditional Use Permit to allow for the continuation of a legal nonconforming 22-foot front yard setback distance, and a ten foot high tennis court fence. The applicant is also seeking approval of a Tree Pernvt to remove and replace a protected tree species. PROJECT ADDRESS : 2909 Wagon Train Lane (APN 8713-014-011 ) Diamond Bar, CA 91765 PROPERTY OWNER: Ezzat Seif 2909 Wagon Train Lane Diamond Bar, CA 91765 APPLICANT: Pete Volbeda 615 N. Benson Avenue, Unit D Upland, CA 91786 PC/Garrison presented staff' s report. Staff recommends Planning Commission approval of Development Review No. 2002-09 and Tree Permit No. 2002-07, the Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval as listed within the resolution . C/Nelson asked staff to correct the tree preservation statement to reflect thaC there are protected trees on-site. Responding to C/Nelson, Mr. Garrison explained that during staff' s review , it was discovered that the site contained protected trees. Subsequently, the applicant filed a Tree Permit application . An Arborist was called in to provide a report that was received after Commission packets were distributed. Staff reviewed the report and � �� - . .. !� NOVEMBER 12, 2002 Page 3 PLANNING COMMISSION recommended that the five trees would have to be removed in order to accommodate ' the tennis court. The Arborist report indicated that the trees that are being removed aze not acceptable to relocation. In accordance with the City' s Development Code, staff recommended repiacement at a 3 : 1 ration with 24-inch box trees . A final landscape plan must be submitted as part of the approval. At that time staff would ' deternurie whether alternate replacement tree sizes would be appropriate. Upon such a finding, the matter would then be returned to the Planning Commission for approval. Chair Ruzicka asked if it would be appropriate to increase the ratio to 4: 1 or 5 : 1 if 15- gallon trees were recommended. PC/Garrison believed that a 3 : 1 ratio would be acceptable for either 15-gallon or 24-inch box . Since this is a discretionary approval, the Commission may choose to require a great replacement ratio. Pete Volbeda, applicant, said he read staff' s report and concuned with the conditions ' of approval . He pointed out that the 24-foot setback applies only to the garage portion of the structure. Chair Ruzicka opened the public hearing. There being no one present who wished to speak on this matter, Chair Ruzicka closed the public hearing. VC/Tye asked C/Nelson to express his thoughts on the proposed tree replacement ratio. C/Nelson said that the younger the tree the better able it is to adapt to new environments. He is not an expert on Walnut Trees . However, DR. Ronald Quinn of CalPoly has conducted a signiFicant amount of restoration research. In speaking with Dr. Quinn, he indicated that the best long-term prospects come from planting seeds. Obviously, that is not an alternative in this case. Therefore, he agreed with Chair Ruzicka about substituting number for size because the objective is to create biomass to contribute to replacement on-site. Accordingiy, more of the smaller trees are required to equal the biomass of a large tree. He suggested that staff contact Dr. Quinn about providing decision-making guidelines for tree replacement. C/Nelson moved, VC/'I'ye seconded, to approve Development Review No. 2002-09 and Tree Permit No. 2002-07 , Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval as listed . � �\j � " ., �,' NOVEMBER 12, 2002 Page 4 PLANNING CONIMISSION within the resolution with the additional condition that the Planning Commission be allowed to review and approve the final landscape plan for this project. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES : COMNIISSIONERS : Nelson, V/C Tye, Nolan, Tanaka, Chair Ruzicka NOES : COMIVIISSIONERS : None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS : None 7.2 Development Review No. 2002-28 Pursuant to Code Section 22.48.020.A. this is a request to construct a first and second story addition of approximately 914 square feet to an existing single family residence of approximately 1 ,722 square feet. PROJECT ADDRESS : 1808 S . Fem Hollow Drive (I.ot 20Q Tract No. 28579) Diamond Bar, CA 91765 PROPERTY OWNER/ Juan A. and Maria S . Vidal APPLICANT: 1808 South Fern Hollow Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 AssocP/Lungu presented staff' s report. Staff recommends Planning Commission approve Development Review No. 2002-28 , the Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. Maria Vidal , owner/applicant, said she read staff' s report and concurs with the conditions of approval as listed. Chair Ruzicka reopened the public hearing. There being no one present who wished to speak on this matter, Chair/Ruzicka closed the public hearing. C/Nolan moved, C/Tanaka seconded, to approve Development Review No. 2002-28, the Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. AYES : COMMISSIONERS : Nolan, Tanaka, Nelson, VC/Tye, Chair/Ruzicka NOES : COMMISSIONERS : None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS : None �. � i � ` - NOVEMBER 12, 2002 Page 5 PLANNING COD�IMISSION 7.3 Tree Permit No. 2000-01(1) Pursuant to Code Sections 22.66 .060 and 22.38 this applicant is a request to change an approved project by pernutting the removal and replacement of preserved and protected Walnut Trees . PROJECT ADDRESS : 2515 Crowfoot Drive (Lot 62, Tract No. 30577) Diamond Bar, CA 91765 ' PROPERTY OWNER/ Mark and Tara Kuo APPL.ICANT: P.O. Box 5406 Diamond Bar, CA 91765 DSA/Smith presented staff' s report. Staff recommends Planning Commission approve Tree Permit No. 2000-01 ( i ), the Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. In response to C/Nelson, DSA/Smith indicated that staff has asked for Sycamore, Arroyo Wiilow or Oak to be proffered as repiacement trees . DSA/Smith responded to C/Nolan that according to the Arborist' s report the tree loss did not occur as a result of grading, it was merely lack of water due to drought conditions . VC/Tye asked if the construction debris piled azound the tree could have had something to do with its demise to which DSA/Smith said it likely would have contributed. Mark Kuo, property owner and applicant, said he had no objections to staff' s conditions. C/Nelson asked Mr. Kuo if there were provisions made during construction to have the tree fenced or flagged to which Mr. Kuo responded there was a fence around the tree during a portion of the construction. There was no construction debris thrown underthe tree. Chair/Ruzicka opened the public hearing. There being no one who wished to speak on this item, Chair/Ruzicka closed the public hearing. VC/T'ye moved, C/Nelson seconded, to approve Tree Pernut No. 2000-01 ( 1 ), Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: NOVEMBER 12, 2002 Page 6 PLANPTING CONIMISSION AYES : COMIVIISSIONERS : VC/Tye, Nelson, Nolan, Tanaka, Chair/Ruzicka NOES : COMMISSIONERS : None ABSENT: CONIMISSIONERS : None 7.4 Development Review No. 2002-26 and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2002-11 Pursuant to Code Sections22.48 .020.A. , 22.20 and 22. 52, this application is a request to demolish an existing two-story single family residence of approximately 4,000 square feet and construct a two-story single family residence with a basement, five-caz garage, balconies, and patio for a total of approximately 14,800 square feet. Additionally, the request includes a swimming pool/spa, gazebo with barbecue, tennis court with fencing and lighting and retaining walls with a maximum exposed height of six feet within the front, side and rear yards. Development Review is an architecturaUsite design review. The Minor Conditional Use Pernvt is for tennis court fencing taller than six feet. The Minor Variance is for a 20 percent reduction in reaz yazd setback far the tennis court. PROJECT ADDRESS : 23980 Falcons View Drive (I.ot 20 of Tract No. 30577) Diamond Bar, CA 91765 PROPERTY OWNER: Dr. and Mrs. Chuahan 23980 Falcons View Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 APPLICANT: Jerry Yeh Horizon Pacific 2707 Diamond Bar Boulevard, #202 Diamond Bar, CA 91765 AssocP/Lungu presented staff' s report. Staff recommends Planning Commission approve Development Review No. 2002-26, and Minor Conditional Use Permit No . 2002- 11 , the Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. Jerry Yeh, applicant, stated he reviewed staff' s report and concurs with the conditions of approval. He asked that the Commission approve the tennis court setback as proposed. Mr. Yeh responded to Chair/Ruzicka that the applicant wants to acquire a limousine. The applicant will not be conducting business at the site. NOVEMBER 12, 2002 Page 7 PLANNING COMMISSION Chair/Ruzicka opened the public hearing. There being no one present who wished to speak on this item, Chair/Ruzicka closed the public hearing. C/Nolan moved, VC/Tye seconded, to approve Development Review No. 2002-26 , ' and Minor Conditional Use Pernut No. 2002- 11 , the Findings of Fact, and conditions as listed in the resolution. AYES : COMNIISSIONERS : Nolan, VC/Tye, Nelson, Tanaka, Chair/Ruzicka NOES : COMNIISSIONERS : None ABSENT: CONID�IISSIONERS : None 7.5 Conditional Use Permit No. 2002-13 Variance No. 2002-OS and Administrative Development Review No. 2002-21 Pursuant to Code Sections 22.58 .020, 22.54.020, and 22.48 .020 is a request to add a portable classroom at the rear of the shopping center proposed be used for the Montessori Academy' s computer lab for an unlimited period of time. The Variance is a required far a retaining wali of varying height of up to 13 feet. PROJECT ADDRESS : Diamond Bar Village Shopping Center 367 Diamond Bar Boulevard Diamond Bar, CA 91765 PROPERTY OV�NER: The Abbey Company 12383 L.ewis Street, #200 Garden Grove, CA 92840 APPLICANT: Diamond Bar Montessori Academy 23555 Palomino Road Diamond Bar, CA 91765 DSA/Smith presented staff' s report. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Pernvt No. 2002- 13 , Variance No. 2002-OS and Administrative Development Review No. 2002-21 , Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. Chair/Ruzicka was concemed about including an "unlimited" period of time. Tige Licato, Co-owner, Montessori Academy, said he read staff' s report and concurs with the conditions of approval. Schoo] officials considered the proposed ]ocation to i - NOVEMBER 12, 2002 Page 8 PLANNING CONfMISSION be the best for the students and least intrusive for the neighboring residents. In addition, existing precious playground area would be preserved. Mr. Licato responded to C/Neison that a chain link fence is located about 100 yards above the school . When the school first opened they were concemed about vehicles coming'off of the freeway down into the school area. Since the school opened, there had been no such incident. Such an occunence would equally affect the cuttent school, playground and mobile unit. C/Nelson felt that some type of barrier should be installed between the freeway and the site. Mr. Licato said that he would absolutely explore the possibility of installing a barrier � to protect the safety of the children even though it would be a financial burden to the school. DCM/DeStefano was uncertain if staff took that safety issue into consideration. From a staff perspective, what would an appropriate design be to attempt to protect structures from vehicles leaving the freeway. Perhaps the applicant could work with CalTrans engineers to determine an appropriate design . Mr. Licato pointed out that the property is adjacent to a freeway on-ramp and not adjacent to the main thoroughfaze. It is a fairly long distance from the freeway to the school. DCM/DeStefano responded to VC/Tye that the current property owner also owns the portion upon which the trailer is proposed to reside. The CalTrans right-of-way begins at about the on-ramp. CalTrans wouid not necessarily be involved in the actual design but could be involved as a consultant. VC/Tye asked Mr. Licato how many computer stations the mobile is proposed to house. Mr. Licato responded that the schooPs objective is to house as many computer workstations as possible, up to 15 or 16, depending on the fire department' s approval. The ingress/egress area is completely secure within the gated facility. The unit was designed to provide a direct benefit to the current student body. Enroliment will not be increased. C/Nolan observed that the on-ramp veers away from the school property toward the freeway. It seemed to him that it would be difficult for a vehicle to reach the school property from the throughway. NOVEMBER 12, 2002 Page 9 PLANNING COMMISSION Chair/Ruzicka asked that the record reflect the Commission ' s primary concem for the safety of the children and the fact that it noted the remote possibility that an automobile or flying object could move from the freeway to the school building and cause injury. Chair/Ruzicka opened the public hearing. Christy Licato spoke in support of the Diamond Bar Montesorri Academy' s proposed project and respectfully requested Commission approval. The proposal addresses the best interest of the students and the community. Manny Gonzales, 4031 Zion Court, Chino, has two children that currently attend Montessori Academy. He supported the project. He felt the computer lab would benefit his children and would be a positive addition to the schooL Michele Cambrono, 620 Skycourt, spoke in support of the proposed project. As a faculty member of the Coast Community College District, she was definitely aware of the importance of computer technology as a part of the curriculum. Chair/Ruzicka closed the public hearing. VC/'I'ye commended Mr. Licato on his successful business venture evidenced by his wish to expand. He recalled that his most important concern in kindergarten was a blanket and cookies. Now kids are concerned with greater issues such as whether to _ bring a floppy disk or compact disk. _ VC/Tye moved, C/'1'anaka seconded, to approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2002- 13 , Variance No. 2002-OS and Administrative Development Review No. 2002-21 , Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval as ]isted within the resolution . Motion approved by the following Roll Call vote: AYES : COMMISSIONERS : VC/Tye, Tanaka, Nelson, Nolan, Chair/Ruzicka NOES : COMMISSIONERS : None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS : None Chair/Ruzicka reiterated his concern for approving an "unlimited" time for use of the building. 7.6 Conditional Use Permit No. 2002-12 Pursuant to Code Section 22.58 , this proposed project is a request to install an exercise facility for women identified as "Curves" in an existing shopping center. NOVEMBER 12, 2002 Page 10 PLANNING COMMISSION PROJECT ADDRESS : Diamond Bar Village Shopping Center 367 Diamond Bar Boulevard Diamond Bar, CA 91765 PROPERTY OWNER: DBV Staz, LLC 11747 Valley El Monte, CA 91732 APPLICANT: Geraldine Conley ' 15189 Palisade Street Chino Hill, CA 91709 AssocP/Lungu presented staff' s report. Staff recommends approval of Conditional Use Pernut No. 2002- 12, the Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. Gerry Conley said she read staffls report and concurred with the conditions of approval as stated. Chair/Ruzicka opened the public hearing. There being no one who wished to speak on this item, Chair/Ruzicka closed the public hearing. AssocP/Lungu responded to VC/Tye that this is a simple and quick low-impact exercise program that does not require shower facilities. C/Nelson moved, VC/Tye seconded, to approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2002- 12, the Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval as listed within the resolution . Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES : COMIVIISSIONERS : Nelson, VC/Tye, Nolan, Tanaka, Chair/Ruzicka NOES : COMNIISSIONERS : None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS : None S. PLANNING COMMISSION CONIIVIENTS : VC/TyepraisedtheCityCouncil for their recognition of Veterans. Even though he never served in the armed farces, he considered it a privilege to stand for a photograph with his fellow Commissioners Nolan and Tanaka and Chair/Ruzicka who did serve in the military. � � . . . - z �� i ; NOVEMBER 12, 2002 Page 11 PLANNING COMMISSION 9. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS : DCM/DeStefano reported that earlier this evening during the Administrative Review process, he approved two homes for construction. On November 21 there will be a meeting with the developer and residents living adjacent to the Walnut Valley Trailer Park property for the purpose of discussing the proposed Extended Stay America project in greater detaiL Chair/Ruzicka felt he might not be able to attend the meeting because of prior commitments. DCM/DeStefano said it would not be necessary for the Commissioners to attend the meeting and that staff would provide a detailed report to the Commissioners at the December 10 meeting. 10. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS : As presented in the agenda. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to come before the Planning Commission, Chair/Ruzicka adjourned the meeting at 8 :45 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, James DeStefano Deputy City Manager Attest: Chairman Joe Ruzicka INTEROFFICE MEMORl�P7DUM TO : Chairman and Planning Commissioners FROM : Ann J . Lungu , Associate Planner q�� V SUBJECT : Agenda Item 7 . 1 - Development Review No . 2002 - 03 located at 21671 E . Gateway Center Drive , Diamond Bar , CA 91765 DATE : November 14 , 2002 ' The referenced project was presented to the Planning Commission on October 22 , 2002 at a duly noticed public hearing . At that time , the Planning Commission received staff ' s report , opened the public hearing and discussed the project . The Planning Commission continued the public hearing to November 26 , 2002 in order to allow the applicant additional time to prepare a traffic impact analysis report . In a correspondence dated October 31 , 2002 , the applicant requested the project be continued to December 10 , 2002 due to a scheduling conflict . RECOMMENDATION : Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue this project ' s public hearing to December 10 , 2002 . Attachment : Correspondence dated October 31 , 2002 from Southwest Design Group . City of Diamond Bar PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: �6 • 1 REPORT DATE : November 19 , 2002 MEETING DATE : November 26, 2002 CASE/FILE NUMBER: Development Review No . 2002-30/Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2002- 15 APPLICATION REQUEST: A request to remodel and add approximately 842 square ' feet to an existing 1 ,690 square feet legal nonconforming singie-family residence including the two car garage PROPERTY LOCATION : 21216 Cold Spring Lane (Lot 3 , Tract No . 25985 ) PROPERTY OWNER: Hong-Man Le, 21216 Cold Spring Lane, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 APPLICANT : Bao L. Nguyen , 21216 Cold Spring Lane, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 BACKGROUND : The property Owner, Hong-Man Le, and Applicant, Bao Nguyen , are requesting approval of an Application to remodel and add approximately 842 square feet to an existing 1 ,690 _ square feet legal nonconforming singie-family residence including the two car garage . The projecYs address is 21216 Cold Spring Lane (Lot 3 , Tract No. 25985), Diamond Bar. It is a rectangular shaped lot, approximately . 17 gross acres , with an existing one story legal nonconforming single-family residence permitted in 1966. An existing 420 square feet patio cover in the rear will be demolished to allow the proposed construction . The project site is zoned R- 1 -7 , 500 for single-family residence. Its General Plan Land tJse designation is Low Density Residential (RL), maximum 3 dwelling units/acre. Generally, the R- 1 -7 , 500 zone surrounds the subject site . 1 REVIEW AUTHORITY Per the City's Development Code, Section 22 .48 .020(A)( 1 ), Development Review is required for projects involving a building permit for reconstruction and additions to structures which are equal to 50 percent or greater of the floor area of the existing structures on the site. The Assessors records indicate that 1 ,300 is the existing structure's - livable square footage , and the Application's garage plan scales 385. 5 square feet for a total of 1685. 5 . Fifty percent of the floor area would be 842 . 75 square feet. Per Development Code Section 22 .01 .040(F), it has been determined that the more stringent Development Review is applicable. The purpose of the Development Review process is to establish consistency with the General Plan through the promotion of high aesthetic and functional standards to complement and add to the economic, physical , and social character of the City. The process will also ensure that new development and intensification of existing development yields a pleasant living , working , or shopping environment and attracts the interest of residents , workers, shoppers and visitors as the result of consistent exemplary design . The City's Design Guidelines and City's Development Code standards are used to promote development that respects the physicai and environmental characteristics of the community and the site. The applicant is also seeking a Minor Conditional Use Permit to allow the continuation of a legal nonconforming 7 feet 4 inch west side yard setback distance. Properties zoned R- 1 - 7 , 500 require a minimum five feet on one side and 10 feet on the other, as well as 15 feet between structures on adjoining parcels . The nonconformity is on the west side . The addition , enlargement, extension , reconstruction, relocation or structural alteration of a nonconforming structure may be allowed with Minor Conditional Use Permit approval , in compliance with Chapter 22 . 56 . The Planning Director or his designee may approve proposed projects of less than 50°/a provided that the total site coverage is no more than 40 percent, that the project conforms to applicable provisions of the Development Code , and the exterior limits of new construction do not exceed the applicable height limit or encroach further into the setbacks than the comparable portions of the existing structure where the nonconformity exists. This proposed project conforms to applicable provisions of the Development Code, the site coverage is less than 40 percent, and it meets the required height limitations and does not encroach further into the setbacks than the existing structure . However, the proposed project is more than 50 percent of the existing square footage . A public hearing by the Hearing O�cer and approval of a Minor Conditional Use Permit and findings are required . Pursuant to Development Code Section 22 .48 . 030, the highest levei of authority shall make concurrent processing . The Planning Commission shall hear both Applications . 2 ANALYSIS : DEVELOPMENT REVIEW/MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT • General Plan and Design Guidelines _ The General Plan has two strategies relating to compatibility within the Land Use Element: 1 . Strategy 1 .2 .4 - Maintain residential areas which provide ownership for single-family housing and .require that new development be compatible with the prevaiiing character of the surrounding neighborhood ; and 2 . Strategy 2 .2 . 1 - Requires that new developments be compatible with surrounding land uses . ' The City's Design Guidelines state that compatibility with adjacent uses is a primary objective. Projects should be designed to minimize negative impacts on surrounding uses. Compatibility equates to the Development Code standards induding setbacks, height, on- . site parking, site coverage, site planning , lot and pad size, mass/bulk, architectural design , landscaping , and the impact to other properties, etc. Just because a structure is larger does not mean it is incompatible with the surrounding single-family residences. Projects brought before the Planning Commission are analyzed on a case by case basis and the evaluation takes all the above into consideration . The proposed Application is one of the largest single-family residences in the area of Cold Spring Lane , Bronco Lane, and Trigger Lane of the Heritage Park neighborhood. However, in the following discussions staff endeavors to show how this project conforms to the General Plan , Design Guidelines, and the Development Code when considering all the elements described above and when compared to the other properties in the vicinity. . Developmenf Standards The following is a comparison of the City's development standards and the project's ro osed develo ment standards : Cit 's Develo ment Standards Pro'ecYs Develo ment Standards 1 . Setbacks (main structure): 1 . Setbacks (main structure) : • Front yard-20 feet from property line • Front yard- 24 feet from property line • Side yards-5 feet & 10 feet minimum . Side yards- 5 feet and 7 feet 4 inches from property line , and 15 feet from property line , and meets 15 feet between structures on adjoining between structures on east side, 11 feet parcels 4 inches and Minor Conditional Use Permit approval on west side • Rear yard-20 feet from property line • Rear yard-approximately 30.37 feet from ro ert line 3 2 . Building Height: 2 . Building Height: Maximum 35 feet • One sto includin chimne 18 feet 3 . Parking : Minimum two-car garage 3 . Parking : Existing two car garage 19 feet with each ba minimum 10 feetX20 feet WX20 . 5 feet L lus drivewa , 4. Site Covera e- maximum 40% 4 . Site Covera e-A roximatel 33% - The above analysis indicates the proposed reconstruction/remodel meets Development Code Standards, except for the legal nonconforming status of the existing west side and the distance between structures on adjoining parcels discussed below. There are a total of three bedrooms plus the potential of the den and the study as bedrooms with the two car garage and driveway. Staff anticipates adequate parking for this remodel . • Site Planning A guiding principal for good site planning is that the siting and design of structures and landscaping should ensure that all blend into the terrain and do not dominate the landform as seen from lower elevations. Cold Spring Lane and the surrounding streets' elevations gradualiy slope upward from Castle Rock Road to Brea Canyon Road with two-three feet change in elevation between the level pads. The Application's addition of square footage is in the rear. The Application has a rear setback of 30 feet; ten feet more than required by Code . The structure fo�lows the line of the existing structure at 7 feet 4 inches and maintains the twelve plus feet beiween structures on adjoining parcels on the west side. The site coverage is approximately 33 percent of the . 17 acre site. The siting of the structure follows the guiding principal and does not dominate the landform as seen from other elevations . • Size, Mass, and Bulk of fhe Structure The Application proposes approximately 2 , 532 gross square feet and a livable of 2 , 142 . The livable square footage of the homes in the Heritage Park area generally built in the 1960's range from 1 ,252 to 1 ;907 square feet (excludes garage, decks , patios , porches , etc. ) 1 They are one story structures . The mass of the addition of square footage for this Application is not on the street. It is a one story reconstruction/remodel . The lot is rectangular-shaped and the reconstruction/ remodel is located on the existing pad . • Architectural Features and Colors The proposed single-family residence's contemporary architectural style is maintained . 1 Information for square footage comes from the Citys Assessor information . This square footage is a livable calculation and does not include, decks, patios, garages, balconies, or accessory structures. The Development Code requires that gross square footage be calculated for applications and site coverage criteria, which includes the above. 4 Colors of the composition roof, stucco, and trim will be maintained . The proposed projecYs architectural trim and palette are compatible with the architectural style of bther homes within the tract. • Floor P/ans _ The proposed single-family structure is one story. This addition enlarges the existing family room/dining room/kitchen area and converts an existing bedroom to a den . It adds the pantry, study, and master bedroom , with walk in closet and bath . Any Home Base Business use requires a Zoning Clearance per Development Code Section , 22 .42 . 070 . This requirement is in the conditions of approvai . • Landscaping Front yard landscaping is often destroyed during a remodel of this magnitude. Therefore , a front yard landscape/irrigation plan is required as a condition of approval. The plan is required to delineate the type of planting materials , color, size , quantity and location . It is a requiremenfi that the landscaping/irrigation be installed or replaced per the plan prior to the Planning Division's final inspection . Additionally, it is noted for the Owner that any walls, gates, fountains, etc. that may be proposed within the front setback shall not encroach into the street's dedicated easement; nor, shall any such structure or dense plant material proposed within the front setback exceetl a maximum height of 42 inches . • Covenant and Agreement As with many approvals , a condition of approval has been added that the Owner is required to complete and record a "Covenant and Agreement to Maintain a Single-family Residence" on a form to be provided by the City (sample attached). The covenant must be _ completed and recorded with the Los Angeles County Recorder's Office prior to the � issuance of a building permit. • Continuation of Legal Nonconforming West Side Yard Setback The existing structure was approved using the Los Angeles County Code in 1966 and met the required setbacks of that Code prior to the City's incorporation . Development Standards Comparison Los Angeles County Code Diamond Bar Development Code Front 20 feet Front 20 feet Sides 5 feet on sides Sides 5 feet on one side , 10 feet on the other, and 15 feet between structures on adjoining parcels Rear 15 feet Rear 20 feet 5 Heiqht Average Finish Grade no more Heiqht Shall not exceed 35 feet from than 35 feet the finish grade at any exterior wall of the structure to the highest point of the roofline Note that the setback standards have changed from the Los Angeles County Code. In this case the west setback is 7 feet 4 inches, not the 10 feet required and the distance between structures on adjoining parcels for the west side does not meet Diamond Bar's Development Code. This Application is considered a nonconforming structure per Development Code Section 22 .68. Nonconforming structures are defined as any parcel or structure that was legal�y created or constructed prior to the adoption of the current Diamond Bar Development Code adopted November 3, 1998, and which does not conform to current Code provisions/standards prescribed for the zoning district in which the use is located . The applicant seeks a Minor Conditional Use Permit to allow for the continuation of the legal nonconforming west side yard setback distance. The R- 1 -7 ,500 zone requires a minimum west side yard setback area of 10 feet. The yard setback dimension is measured ' from the property line to the wall of the building. The purpose of this development standard is to create an open side yard area proportionate to the lot size that will promote a sensible building plan , and contribute to an attractive street scene. The proposal is to maintain the existing west side yard setback of 7 feet 4 inches . The Development Code Section 22 .68 . 030(B ) allows for the continuation of a legal nonconforming yard setback provided a Minor Conditional Use Permit is approved , and the improvements conform to applicable provisions of the Oevelopment Code and the exterior limits of new construction do not exceed the applicable height limit or encroach further into the setbacks than the comparable portions of the existing structure. The Minor Conditional Use Permit is required to determine whether the proposed use should be permitted by weighing the public need for and the benefit to be derived from the use against the impact, which it may cause . Additionally, this discretionary approval proeess aims to ensure that the proposal is consistent with the Citys General Plan land use policies and zoning standards; provide for quality site design , layout and architecture; and promote a rational design transition with adjacent properties. The appiicant is requesting approval of a 2 . 66-foot reduction . Based on the submitted design , the maintenance of the existing west side yard setback distance wili not alter the established neighborhood pattern or character or result in a haphazard layout. It is staff' s opinion that the reduced west side yard setback would not substantially block the view or degrade the light and open space area of the adjacent development. Additionaliy, given the existing development pattern of the neighborhood , consisting of lots with various siope percentages , the intent of the Code to respect and compliment the west side yard setback area of adjacent properties will not be compromised . Therefore, staff is 6 of the belief that the deviation would not be detrimental to the public health , safety or welfare of the community nor would it dispel the goal of the ordinance. SITE WORK The subject reconstruction/remodel is on the existing pad . No grading or retaining walls are ' - anticipated . Should it be necessary to work more than 50 cubic yards of earth , the Pubiic Works Division will require a grading/drainage plan . Best Management Practices requirements (BMP's) are not required to be incorporated into the project plans . However, the BMP's must be implemented for the construction activities ' on site to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) regulations per the Public Works Division . , PRESERVED/PROTECTED TREES Per Development Code 22 .38 .060(H ), parcels of '/2 acre or less are exempted from Preserved and Protected Tree regulations . Therefore, the subject parcel at . 017 acres is exempt. VIEW IMPACT The Application is for one story structure . The neighboring parcels are single-family residences of one story. By maintaining the height limits of the Development Code , the proposed remodel is not considered an impact to the view corridor of surrounding properties . COMPATIBILITY TO THE SURROUNDING AREA Taking into consideration the above elements ; such as , development standards, site pianning, lot and pad size , mass of structure , architectural design , landscaping, site work, � and view impact, staff believes this project is compatible to its neighbors and the surrounding area . ADDITIONAL REVIEW The Public Works Division and the Building and Safety Division reviewed this project. Their comments are included in both the report and the conditions of approval . NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING : On November 13 , 2002 , 64 property owners within a 500-foot radius of the project site were notified by maii . On November 15, 2002 , notification of the public hearing for this project was made in the San Gabriel Vallev Tribune and Inland Vallev Dailv Bulletin newspapers ; and a notice of public hearing on a display board was posted at the site and 7 displayed for at least 10 days before the public hearing ; as well as three other posted within the vicinity of the Application . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) , the City has determined that the proposed project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to the guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA), Section 15301 (e). RECOMMENDATIONS : Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review No. 2002- 30/Minor Condftional Use Permit No. 2002-15, Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval , as listed within the attached resolution . REQUIRED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FINDINGS :* 1 . The design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with the General Plan , development standards of the applicable district, design guidelines , and architectural criteria for specialized area (e.g. , theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards , or planned developments); 2 . The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future development, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards, 3 . The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the characteristics of the surrounding neighborhood and wiil maintain and enhance the harmonious orderly and attractive development contempiated by Chapter 22 .48 , the General Plan , City Design Guidelines , or any applicable specific plan ; 4 . The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public; as well as, its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials , texture, and color that will remain aesthetically appealing; 5 . The proposed project wiil not be detrimental to the public health , safety or welfare or materially injurious (e.g . , negative affect on property values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 6 . The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). REQUIRED NONCONFROMING STRUCTURES FINDINGS :* The addition , enlargement, extension , reconstruction , relocation or structural alteration of the nonconforming structure would not result in the structure becoming : 1 . Incompatible with other structures in the neighborhood ; 2 . Inconsistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan ; 3 . A restriction to the eventual/future compliance with the applicable regulations of this Development Code ; 8 4 . Detrimental to the health , safety, and general welfare of persons residing in the neighborhood ; 5 . Detrimental and/or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood . REQUIRED MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PEMIT FINDINGS :* 1 . The proposed use is allowed within the subject zoning district with the approval of a Minor conditional Use Permit and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Development Code and the Municipal Code ; 2 . The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicab�e specific plan ; 3 . The design , �ocation , size and operating characteristics of the proposed use are compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity; 4 . The subject site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of use being proposed including access, provisions of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and the absence of physical constraints, 5. Granting the Minor Conditional Use Permit will not be detrimental to the public interest, health , safety, convenience or welfare , or materially injurious to persons , property or improvements in the vicinity and zoning districts in which the property is located , and ; 6 . The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Prepared by: Linda Kay Smith , Development Services Assistant ATTACHMENTS : 1 . Draft Resolution of Approval with above (*) Findings ; 2 . Applications ; 3 . Tree Statement; 4 . Sample Covenant and Agreement; 5 . Site Photos, 6 . Aeriai ; 7 . Exhibit "A" - site plan , fioor plan , elevations , dated November 26 2002 . - D: WORD-LINDA/PLANCOMM/PROJECTS/DR 02-30 21216 Cold Spring/REPORT DR 02-30 21216 . . . '� 9 DRAFT RESOLUTION ATTACHMENT " 1 " PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2002-xx A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF - DIAMOND BAR APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO . 2002 - 30/MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2002-15 AND CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION 15301 (e), A REQUEST TO REMODEL AND ADD APPROXIMATELY 842 SQUARE FEET TO AN EXISTING 1 ,690 SQUARE FEET LEGA� NONCONFORMING SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE INCLUDING A TWO CAR GARAGE. THE PROJECT SITE IS LOCATED AT 21216 COLD SPRING LANE (LOT 3 , TRACT NO . 25985), DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA. A. RECITALS , 1 . The property Owner, Hong-Man Le, and Applicant, Bao Nguyen , have filed an application to approve Development Review No . 2002-30/Minor Conditional Use Permit No . 2002- 15 and Categorical Exemption , for a property located at 21216 Cold Spring Lane (Lot 3 , Tract No. 25985 ), Diamond Bar, Los Angeles County, Califomia , as described in the title of this Resolution . Hereinafter in this Resolution , the subject Development Review/Minor Conditional Use Permit and Categorical Exemption shall be referred to as the "Application . " 2 . On November 13 , 2002, 64 property owners within a 500-foot radius of the project site were notified by mail . On November 15, 2002 , notification of the public hearing for this project was made in the San Gabriel Valiev Tribune ' and Inland Vallev Dailv Builetin newspapers ; and a notice of public hearing on a display board was posted at the site and displayed for at least 10 days before the public hearing ; as well as three other posted within the vicinity of the application . 3 . On November 26 , 2002 , the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted and concluded a duly noticed public hearing on the Application . B . RESOLUTION NOW , THEREFORE , it is found , determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows 1 . The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals , Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. DRAFT RESOLUTION ATTACHMENT " 1 " 2 . The Planning Commission hereby determines that the project identified above in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA) and guidelines promulgated thereunder. This is pursuant to Section 15301 (e) of Article 19 of Chapter 3 , Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations . 3 . The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds and determines that, having considered the record as a whole including the findings set forth below, and changes and alterations which have been incorporated into and conditioned upon the proposed project set forth in the Application , there is no evidence before this Planning Commission that the project proposed herein will have the potential of an adverse effect on wild life resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Based upon substantial evidence, this Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effects contained in Section 753 . 5 (d ) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 4 . Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth herein , this Planning Commission , hereby finds as follows: (a) The project relates to a parcel at 21216 Cold Spring Lane (Lot 3, Tract No. 25985), Diamond Bar, California . It is a rectangular shaped lot, approximately . 17 gross acres , with an existing one story legal nonconforming single-family residence. (b) The General Plan Land Use designation is �ow Density Residential (RL), maximum 3 dwelling units/acre. The project site is zoned Single- family Residence , R- 1 -7 ,500 . (c) Generally, the R- 1 -7 , 500 Zone surrounds the subject site. (d ) The Application is a request to remodel and add approximately 842 square feet to an existing 1 ,690 square feet legal nonconforming single-family residence including the two car garage . DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (e) The design and layout .of the proposed development are consistent with the General Plan , development standards of the applicable district, design guidelines , and architectural criteria for specialized area (e.g. , theme areas , specific plans, community plans , boulevards , or planned developments. The project site, currently developed with a one story, single-family residence, was established before the adoption of the City's General Plan and current Development Code. The adopted General Plan of 2 DRAFT RESOLUTION ATTACHMENT " 1 " July 25, 1995, has a land use designation of Low Density Residential (RL) (maximum 3 dwelling units/acre). The Application complies with the City's General Plan objectives and strategies related to maintaining the integrity of residential neighborhoods and open space, the current Diamond Bar Development Code, and with the City's Design Guidelines. There is no specific plan. The proposed project conforms to applicable provisions of fhe Development Code, the site coverage is /ess than 40 percent, is eomparab/e with the existing neighborhood, it meets fhe required height limitations and does not encroach furfher into the setbacks than the original structure. This is a one story home. The neighboring parcels are single-family residences and by maintaining the height limits of the Development Code, the proposed remodel is not considered an impact to the view corridor of surrounding properties. � (fl The design and layout of the proposed development will not intertere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future development, and wili not create traffic or pedestrian hazards . Diamond BarBoulevard, Brea Canyon Road and Cold Springs Lane adequately serve the project site. These streets are designed to handle tra�c created by residential development. The project site is currently developed wifh a one story single-family residence. The proposed reconstruction/remodeling does nof change the existing use of a single-family residence. A/though the proposed - addition enlarges the existing residence, it meets the 35 feef height " limitation per the Development Code. Additionally, the Application has a style consistent with surrounding properties. The structure is not expected to unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring exisfing or future development with regard fo view or traffic. (g) The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the characteristics of the su�rounding neighborhood and will maintain and enhance the harmonious , orderly and attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22 .48, the General Pian , City Design Guidelines , or any applicable specific plan . The proposed single-family residence 's modem architectural sfy/e is maintained at the streetscape. Colors of the composition roof, stucco, and trim will be maintained. The proposed project's architectural trim and palette are compatible with the architectural style of other homes 3 DRAFT RESOLUTION ATTACHMENT " 1 " within the tract. The Applicafion design is consistent with the General P/an, City's Design Guidelines and Developmenf Code. There is no speci�c plan. (h) The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable - environment for its occupants and visiting public, as well as its neighbors, through good aesthetic use of materials, texture , and color that will remain aesthetically appealing. The colors, materials, and fextures proposed are the same as existing and are complimentary to the existing homes within ihe area while offering variety and low levels of mainfenance. (i) The proposed project will not be detrimental to the public health , safety, or weifare or materially injurious (e.g . , negative affect on property values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Structural plan check, City permits, inspections, Fire Department approvals and possibly a soils report are required for construction. These processes will ensure that the finished project will nof be defrimenta/ to the public health, safety, or we/fare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Additionally, a Covenant and Agreement is required and runs with the land to maintain a sing/e-family residence. Q ) The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The environmenta/ evaluation shows that the proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to the guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA), Section 15301 (e). NONCONFROMING STRUCTURES (k) The addition , enlargement, extension , reconstruction , relocation or structurai alteration of the nonconforming structure would not result in the structure becoming incompatible with other structures in the neighborhood . As stated in Item (g), the proposed project is compatible with other structures in the vicinity. Other one story structures in the vicinity have remodeled and added increased square foofage. (I ) The addition , enlargement, extension , reconstruction , relocation or structural alteration of the nonconforming structure would not result 4 DRAFT RESOLUTION ATTACHMENT " 1 " in the structure becoming inconsistent with the General Plan or any applicabie specific plan . As stated in /tems (e) and (g), the proposed project is consistent with the City's General Plan objectives and strategies, Chapter 22. 48 of ' - the Development Code, and City Design Guidelines. (m) The addition , enlargement, extension , reconstruction , relocation or structural alteration of the nonconforming structure would not result in the structure becoming a restriction to the eventual/futu �e compliance with the applicable regulations of this Development Code . The existing parcel is . 17 acres approved by Tract Map No. 25985. The existing structure was complefed under the Los Angeles County Code in 1966 and met the required sefbacks of that Code prio� to the City's incorporation. The distance between structures on adjoining parcels on the sides has changed from the Los Angeles County Code of 10 feet to 15 feet. The application maintaining the existing 12 feet 4 inches is considered a nonconforming parcel and structure. A nonconforming structure is defined as any parcel or structure that was legally created or constructed prior to the adopfion of the cur�ent Diamond Bar Development Code adopted November 3, 1998, and which does not conform to current Code provisions/sfandards prescribed for the zoning district in which the use is located. The proposed project coniorms to the ofher applicable provisions of this ' Development Code and the exterior limits of the new construction do not exceed the applicable height limit or encroach further into the setbacks than the comparable portions of the existing structure in the front and side where the nonconformity exists. No further - nonconforming status of this parcel is anticipated. - (n ) The addition , enlargement, extension , reconstruction , relocation or structural alteration of the nonconforming structure would not result in the structure becoming detrimental to the health , safety, and general welfare of persons residing in the neighborhood . Structural plan check, City permits, inspections, Fire Department approvals and possibly a soils report are required for construction. These processes will ensure that the finished project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Additionally, a Covenant and Agreement is required and runs with the land to maintain a single-family residence. (o) The addition , enlargement, extension , reconstruction , relocation or structural alteration of the nonconforming structure would not result 5 DRAFT RESO�UTION ATTACHMENT " 1 " in the structure becoming detrimental and/or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood . As stated in Items (e-h), the architectura/ design of the proposed deve/opment is compafible with the characteristics of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain the harmonious, orderly and attractive developmenf contemp/ated by Chapter 22. 48, the General Plan, City Design Guidelines, or any applicab/e speci�c plan. Also, as stated in Item (i), City permits, inspecfions and soils reports are required for construction and wil/ ensure fhat the finished project will not be detrimenfal to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (p) The proposed use is allowed within the subject-zoning district with the approval of a Minor Conditional Use Permit and complies with ail other applicable provisions of this Development Code and the Municipai Code. As state in Items (e-o), the proposed use is a/lowed within the zoning district and complies with al/ other applicabie provisions of the Development Code and Municipa/ Code. (q) The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan . As stated in Item (e), fhe proposed use is consistenf with the General Plan and any there is not applicable specific plan. (r) The design , location , size and operating characteristics of the proposed use are compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity. As stated in Ifems (e-o), the design, location, size, etc, is compafible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity. (s) The subject site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of use being proposed including access , provisions of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses , and the absence of physical constraints . 6 DRAFT RESOLUTION ATTACHMENT " 1 " As stated in Items (e-o), the subject site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of use being proposed including access, provisions of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and the absence of physical constraints. (t) Granting the Minor Conditional Use Permit will not be detrimental to the public interest, health , safety, convenience , or weifare , or materially injurious to person , property or improvements in the vicinity and zoning districts in which the property is located . Structural p/an check, City permits, inspections, Fire Department approvals and possibly a soils report are required for construction. These processes will ensure that fhe finished project will not be , detrimenta/ to the public health, safefy, or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Additionally, a Covenant and Agreement is required and runs with the land to mainfain a single-family residence. The addition of square footage to the main sfructure follows the line of fhe existing one story structure in the bofh fhe front and side, and maintains a 35 feet height; therefore, the proposed application has no negative affect or impact to the view corridor of surrounding properties. Additionally, the colors and materials utilized are compatible with the homes within the surrounding area. (u ) The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The environmental evaluation shows that the proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to the guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA), Sections 15301 (e). 5 . Based upon the findings and conclusion set forth above , the Planning Commission hereby approves this Appiication subject to the following conditions : (a ) The project shall substantially conform to site plan , floor plans , and elevations collectively labeled as Exhibit "A" dated November 26 , 2002 , as submitted to , amended herein , and approved by the Planning Commission . (b) The subject site shall be maintained in a condition that is free of debris both during and after the construction , addition , or implementation of the entitlement granted herein . The removal of ali 7 DRAFT RE50LUTION ATTACHMENT " 1 " trash , debris, and refuse, whether during or subsequent to construction , shall be done only by the property owner, applicant or by duly permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation , and disposal of solid waste from residential , commercial , construction , and industrial areas within . the City. It shall be the applicant's obligation to insure that the waste contractor utilized has obtained permits from the City of Diamond Bar to provide such services . PUBLIC WORKS • (c) The Best Management Practices (BMP's) requirements stiall be implemented for the construction activities on site to ccmply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES ) regulations . (d) If applicable, the applicant shail comply with Standard Urban Storm � Water Mitigation Ptan requirements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. BUILDING AND SAFETY (e) The applicant shall provide temporary sanitation facilities while under construction . (f) A permit for demolition shall be obtained from the South Coast Air Quality Management District. (g ) The singte-family structure shall meet the 2001 California Codes: Uniform Building Code , Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code , and the 2001 National Electrical Code requirements . (h ) The single-family structure requires Fire Department approval and is located in "Hiah Fire Zone" and shall meet the following requirements of that fire zone: ( 1 ) All roof covering shall be "Fire Retardant, Class A"; tile roofs shall be fire stopped at the eaves to preclude entry of the flame or members under the fire ; (2) All enclosed under-floor areas shail be constructed as exterior walis; (3) All openings into the attic, floor, and/or other enclosed areas shall be covered with corrosion-resistant wire mesh not less than '/4 inch nor more than YZ inch in any dimension except where such openings are equipped with sash or door; 8 DRAFT RESOLUTION ATTACHMENT " 1 " (4) Chimneys shall have spark arresters of maximum '/z inch screen . (i) This single-family structure shall meet the State Energy Conservation Standarda ' (j) The minimum design wind pressure shall be 80 miles per hour and "C" exposure . - (k) Smoke detectors shail be provided in all sleeping rooms . (i ) Prior to the issuance of any construction permits, the applicant shall submit construction plans to the Los Angeles County Fire Department for review and approvaL ' (m ) Appiicant shall submit a soils report if required for the proposed improvements to be reviewed and approved by the City. (n) The applicant shali comply with the requirements of the Fire Department; City Planning; Building and Safety, and Public Works Divisions . PLANNING (o) A landscape/irrigation plan for the front yard shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to Building Permit issuance . The plan shall delineate the type of planting materials , color, size, quantity and location . The landscaping/irrigation shall be installed or replaced in the front yard prior to the Planning Division 's final inspection . Any walls, gates , fountains, etc. , that may be - proposed within the front setback shall not encroach into streeYs dedicated easement or exceed a maximum 42 inches in height. (p) Drainage pattem shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Division ; surface water shali drain away from the building at a 2 % minimum slope. (q ) The single-family residence shall not be utilized in a manner that creates adverse effects upon the neighborhood and environmental setting of the residential site to levels of dust, glare/light, noise, odor, traffic, or other disturbances to the existing residential neighborhood and shall not result in significantly adverse effects on public services and resources . The single-family residence shall not be used for commerciai/institutional purposes , or otherwise used as a separate dweiling. The property shali not be used for regular gatherings which result in a nuisance or which create traffic and parking problems in the neighborhood . 9 DRAFT RESOLUTION ATTACHMENT " 1 " (r) The Owners/Applicants shall complete and record a "Covenant and Agreement to Maintain a Single-family Residence" on a form to be provided by the City. The covenant must be completed and recorded with the Los Angeles County's Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of a bui�ding permit. (s) Prior to any Home Base Business use in proposed office , the Owners/Applicants shall obtain a Zoning Clearance subject to the standards outlined in Development Code Section 22 .42 .070 . (t) This grant is valid for two (2 ) years and shall be exercised (i .e. , construction} within that period or this grant shall expire. A one- ( 1 ) year extension may be approved when submitted to the City in writing at least 60 days prior to the expiration date . The Deputy City Manager wi�l consider the extension request at a duly noticed public hearing in accordance with Chapter 22 . 72 of the City of Diamond Bar Development Code. (u ) This grant shall not be effective for any purpose until the permittee and owners of the property involved (if other than the permittee) have filed , within fifteen ( 15) days of approval of this grant, at the City of Diamond Bar Community and Development Services Department, their affidavit stating that they are aware and agree to accept ail the conditions of this grant. Further, this grant shail not be effective until the permittee pays remaining City processing fees. (v) If the Department o# Fish and Game determines that Fish and Game Code Section 711 .4 applies to the approval of this project, then the applicant shall remit to the City, within five days of this granYs approval , a cashier's check of $25.00 for a documentary handling fee in connection with Fish and Game Code requirements. Furthermore, if this project is not exempt from a filing fee imposed because the project has more than a deminimis impact on fish and wildlife, the applicant shall also pay to the Department of Fish and Game any such fee and any fine which the Department determines to be owed . The Planning Commission shall : (a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution ; and (b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution , by certified mail to Owner, Hong-Man Le , and Applicant, Bao Nguyen , 21216 Cold Spring Lane , Diamond Bar, CA 91765. 10 DRAFT RESOLUTION ' ATTACHMENT " 1 " ' APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26th DAY OF NOVEMBER 2002 , BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. By: - Joe Ruzicka , Chairman i , James DeStefano, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced , passed , and adopted , at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of November 2002, by the following vote: AYES : Commissioner. ' NOES : Commissioner. ABSENT: Commissioner: ABSTAIN : Commissioner. � ATTEST: James DeStefano, Secretary 11 APP�ICATIONS � , CITY OF DIAMOND BAR � � COMMUNITY AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ' DEPARTMENTIPianning Division Case # � ZoO� -3p i„ ' ' � i 1 a 21825 E. Copley Drive Deposit $ 000.00 Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Receipt # Phone (909)396-5676 Fax (909)861 -3117 BY Date Rec'd l` ❑ ADMINISTRATIVE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FORCITYUSE \+eB�o �DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPUCATION ' Record Owner Applicant ApplicanYs Agent Name Lk��-1 � (�,L: .. �'; HIV (�i (:tiJ4p �� , i5 ��:, c, (Las name first) (Last name first) (Last name first) Address � IZI �.. C :_ i. � ; � �: iN �' � /s-I�Oi= , i: : ; H �� .. City � I I`j :b� uv�� I� 1'�/ � (c;c �. .. i' -7 ' � . Zip Ca'� � � 1 �� 1 � u« Phone (/Q"1 �i-�+�+ ( - � � Phone ( ) } •-{ �-� � Phone (�� U �' � �J / �- � ( �M �li J Faz ( 1�<i I / � � �%�t� Fax ( ) l�i' �: � � Fax ( ) \ � An application fee in accordance with Section 22.44.040 of the Municfpal Code must accompany this Application. The application fee is either a flat fee or a deposit plus payment of the City's processing costs computed on an hourly basis. The applicable fee or deposit amount for this appiication is indicated above. If it is a deposit, the applicant shail pay any processing costs that exceed the amount of the deposit prior to issuance of the permit; if processing costs are less than the deposit, a refund will be paid. NOTE: It is the applicant's responsibility to notify the City in writing of any change of the principals involved during the processing of this case. (Attach separate sheet, if necessary, including names, addresses, and signatures of inembers of � . partnerships, joint ventures, and directors of corporations.) � Consent of Owners: 1 certify that 1 am the ownei of the herein-described property and permit the applicant to fife this request. Print Name / L { �� ' �- rl� t"� t"� (All recortl owners) Signed 1 �� " `- l,lti��l Date I - � " � (AII remrd ners ) � . Certification ot Applicant: l, the undersigned, hereby certify under pena/ty o/ perjury that [he information herein provided is correct to the best o/ my know/edge. � �_ . � ^ PrintName �+ � i l. � yj- � i '� �'? � ( _ ,( rant or gent) ' Signed � .- i�- -c ; J'� �. Date 'r , , � , . �_ ' (ApplicantorAgent) � � _ _ . , � Location �' i i � i� r' � f (- L ri r� � - � � j� _'.; = ti� ; _ f�i '� i. 4 ' t � � _ � (Street address or tract and lot number) � Zoning House Numbering Map/aeria� Previous Cases Present Use of Site ; ' � ' ' �' � a � `i M � ' � �— Use applied for 'j � � � '�� U' �l `+ H ' � t' ------ 1 �1 � CITY OF DIAMOND BAR COMMUNiTY AND � DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Case # M 7�Z�rS pianning Division Deposit 5 ' (,: � � � 1 � 21825 E. Copley Dnve Receipt # Diamond Bar, CA 91765 � BY Phone (909 ) 396-5676 Fax (909) 8613117 IDate Rec'd I FOR CITV USE ��M�� ❑ COWDITtONAL USE PERMIT '�B' }�(MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Record Owner Applicant ApplicanYs Agent Name -. ' i� cr,i- . ,'��a I� N ��-': i y ��=(�- �' h f''`�- �- J (Last name firs[) (Last name first) (�ast name first) Address - � L : L � 1, Il.� � _ � � � ( � � � I1 : P't. ML' ) a. �_�:. ..; Clry � I i1 !ti cN j� `� Fy, � . , \ . , Zip , _ �._ r, t � : '7 � ,. _ Phone ( ) - Phone ( ) ~� F'hone ( ) ^ ` � - i - ` G.4.- i '_ 'i � � ._ �. � Fax ( ) �`_ � ;).� � �ti —� 4 Fax ( ) Fax ( ) � � M application fee in secordance with Sectio� 22.44.040 of the Municipal Code must accompany this Application. The application fae is aither a flat fee or a deposit ptus payment of tfie City's processing costs computed on an hourly basis. The applicable fee or deposit amount for this application is indicated above, lf it is a depostt, the applicant shatl pay any processing costs that excead the amount of the deposit prior to issuance of the permit; if processing costs are less than the deposit, a refund will be paid. NOTE: 4t is the appticanYs responsibiliry to notify the City in writing of any change of the principats involved dunng the processing of this case . (Attach separate sheet, if necessary, including names, addresses, and siqnatures of inembers o! paMecships, yoirt ventures, anC directors ot co�pocatwns.) Consentr 1 eertl/y that 1 am the owner ol tha hemin-desc�Vbed property and permie the appliunt fo /!le tAis request. Signed �"� , �. "� , �� k � , � " Oate ' . . iat rema w�an � Grtlflufion : 1, ths untl�nipnW, h�roby c�rtl/Y undK o�n�lty o/ p�Nury th� t th� lnlnrmir�on hetirn �rc� ��d-C � s conect to �he best o/ my know/Wpe. ' Print Name , , � ; � „ , � r � „ (ApOhcantorAgBnt) - - . S�gned " � Date (Mv��nt o� Agenp Location of project , , r • - �. �� p- � r � � (Street address or vaa antl lot numceq Zoning Numbering Map Previous Cases 1 ATTACHMENT "3" TREE STATEMENT TREE PRESERVATION STATEMENT {�Y The sub}ect psoperty is '1: acre or {ess and is exempt from Tree � � Preservation Requirements . - [ ] The subject property contains no native oak, walnut, sycamore , wiliow, or naturalized Califomia Pepper trees . [ ] The subje,ct property contains one or more oak, wainut, sycamore, willow,_ or naturalized California Pepper trees. The appficant anticipates that no activity (grading and/or construction) wiil take piace within five (5) ' feet of the outer dripiine of any oak, walnut, sycamore, willow, or , naturalized California Pepper tree . [ ) The subject property contains one or more oak, walnut, sycamore, willow, , or naturalized California Pepper trees. The applicant states that activity � (grading and/or construction) will take ptace within five (5) feet of the outer dripline of any oak, walnut, sycamore, willow, or naturalized Galifornia Pepper tree . A Tree Permit has been or wi{I be app{ied for prior to any activity taking place on the property. �--�, y `� �_ � ,ti � t� - �-1 ? •� 1 � (AppficanPs Signatur�. � � (Date) D:WORD-tINDA\FORMS\TftEE STATEMENT ATTACHMENT "4" SAMPLE COVENANT & AGREEMENT RECORDING REQUEST BY: City of Diamond Bar WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO : City of Diamond Bar 21825 E. Copley Drive - Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Space Above line For Recorder's Use Oniy COVENANT AND AGREEMENT TO MAINTAIN A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE The undersigned hereby certify that are the owner(s) of the hereinafter described real property located at in the City of Diamond Bar, County of Los Angeles, State of California , commonly known as �egally described as Lot Tract Maq Na ' Assessor's Book and Parcel Number And , I/we do hereby covenant and agree for ourselves , heirs , assigns , transferees and successors , with the City of Diamond Bar (hereinafter "City') that the above described property shall be used for single family residential purposes only, and that no portion of the structure(s) or property shall be rented , leased or sold separate ' and apart from any remaining portions of the property or structure(s). This covenant and agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon ourselves , future owners , their heirs, and successors and assignees and shall continue in effect until and unless approved otherwise by the City of Diamond Bar is specifically - intended that the benefits and burdens of this covenant run with the land . If the City is required to bring legai action to enforce this covenant, then the city sha�l be entitled to its attorney fees and oourt costs . By By DATED : STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) On this day of , 200 before me the undersigned Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared personaliy known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that executed the same in authorized capacity(ies) , and that by signature(s) on the instrument the person (s) or the entity upon behaif of which the person(s) acted , executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal . Notary Public in and for said State - ---- - - --,---- -- -- - -__ _ -___ . __ ..... . ��t� ��¢�§ ' -- - ---- - � ��@�� T_ _ � 1 � 1 � � c'� L. L� � 1�` I� II� � L�... .� 1�1 � . , , , �� ^ � y � � �� _ __ _ _ 69'-O ______.._�"_._ �-.-� i . — ----- m NOTG � corvcRe*e e�c rw.4 __ — - ---- - -_— ___ - LONiRALT00. 51iALL VEi¢IM1Y AJ.L GONDITION5 AND DIt�N61ON5 ON JJB 91T['. BUILPIN6 DATA �� — � : i � � . AND NOYIFY iHC pitl£2 Aryp TNC hRLHit£GT UF ANY VARIATION6 FROM � DIML%310tL4 3HOWN ON THEBC opAWINB9 BEPOI¢E pNOGEEDIN5 WITH ANY NbRK . .. . . � � � � R - nNY ERR.OR9 OR OMISBIONS FOUMJ IN T1E5E D 'NANIIN89 9W�1l. gE gpOiASHT TO Le6N. DESGRIP�ION ' ' ' ' OY14CR ANo ,4 LHIIEGT A'Rf3i1YON IMMEDIAIELY. ' � � , - tX� NOT 6GAI.E R'�AWIN63, W'tITIW DIh�N519t5 TAKL' PR�GEDENGE OVER pRpg�T AD�RE55 �I]I6 GOLD 5PRIkb LPNE � . : ' g � q � a ... `�GN.EA DIh�NSIONB. g ' � /"� � 919.�FGT PEMODELINb � . . . - POOI ' . � '' 'I ��4 � � � � C RIBLIG Yt�RKB OYNCA HONG MAN iHl LE / FfAO LUU N6WEN � 12'.II��I/ °' �. ' � �i' 2 If2" : '� 39 4" / �J � 0 I- PyL LANp5GAPE IRRI6hTIONMJST N4ET GAViENT GI1Y REOIIREMENT3 t�F lE4 (909) BB� '19 '14 �j . — � � I � �'Y ��. Pf�Pc`R IN31'PLLAiIaN. tl . . . . . . -- - _— C� OO� OLG � 2- NO bISCNAR�E OP caNSiPo�G�1oN VV5'tEWATEry F91tiDiN5 Mh'fBYIAl9, �i-HRIS, �� }5pp,o0 '..wFi � „0� � OIL SEOIYENT YFOM YHE 51iE 15 PCpMITRD. ' Lpry yi4LL 1 HI6Hi-� � � F%15TIN6 OWILIN6 BIZE I'!'3.00 541PT (6ARhBE 909.00 SGPi) 4L � 9- A PpOP2R}Y LINE 4EANdli hLgT BE INSTALIID ON THE SANITARY SCYER m I � _ LATF.RAL IR TIE fROJE�,T IS OVER 5afc eEE GITf STANDAktl PLAN ST3. _ . . � � ' p NPW FDDITION 042.00 5fiYT _ 9- IF NE PPOJLi.'T IS OVyR 00%, A BAGKWATPA VALVE 19 qZqUIWfD ON THE �yy Ap��7�W EXI9TIN6 91ZE 4'1% " � � � � m 9hN11Ai1Y 9EYSR 4AiF.FAL IP THE DISGHAR6E8 FROM PIHTIRE'.i NTH FIApp ( �, i� � LEYEL PoM6 THAi ARP LpLA'YED FJFJAW TH� NEM UP9TRFM1 NAWIOLI LOVER � .. ' x'_, I ' . , � d OF TNC pyELIG 9EV�CR. 9E GITY STANOARp ry.{�15T-24. T�Tµ 'Ma'[�9E n✓gI.LIN6 911E 1615P0 SQPT . _ wr siu✓oreu.iws si� s�sn I . � i ; �, � i� � � 3 NB'LAGE S`CEWPI.K ON P2GK Vdffi�E THE F66REbAR NA4 BE£N ENP09Efi. � - . ... ..___ _ . _ _"_""__"_c .. „ � . . LV I� C II �� U � b- 81D2WN.K, OftIVEvl4Y. CU28� ANU GURER pEAA1R8 pR REPIAGEMEryi (T1gT i h > BE fqMP4LiE0 P2R Fl.9lIG Y b R K S S P L L I P i G n T I O N S. B E C L IT' ST AND A R D wve usm UNIFORM WILDINB GODE, W9B � � � r i r FI.AN 9T-I, 8T-3 8T-9. Tfl� Ip.AN9 MU9T HAVt" A PFOFILE OP THE '-"'" - ^ � � . ' � �F. . _"_ �' ' _ _ ORIVL'Yt4Y, M OF 51.OFE ON PRIV2W4Y hJ1:VA'i10N9. i r_ _ ;, I � .. � m � � o- __,I I ',. ..: 'I- 9Pfb BAB9 NU9i BE RAGkV AROIRlD THC CON5TRIKTION SiTE TO PNCVENT � I ; . z E'.RP610N PROM iHC 811E. ANO 9TREEf �RPPLE WATER EIVIERIN6 TH@ 511E. WVD U9E OCSYINATION � �1 �� ' . i � I i I � �;'_ _""_'__,�__ _ o r'�.-:__, ._" ".___"" "'� 1`--"_" ' ""'- _� . . . eE1�ERAL PLPN OE316NATION� LOW �I'JJSITY RE610ENflAL II I� ""_ � �:. . 8- ALL VfUIN 41tVL5 WITHIN TNF. SiRE2i RI6Hi OY NV.Y MJ9T BE GONS'fRUGTEA Q � I( �RJ r OP dKYILE IRON PIPE. 7ANIN6 D�STRIGT� I� . I 5 ' \O`, T AREh �ISTHIGT� Q^ PI.AN NOLOER MJSi NAVE 'f4E WLANS RECi1EGK13l AN� STAMPW POR _ q M'PNOVML 8Y 1HE Wpl.IG YbPKS �EPMTB+H.'Ni BPFORE THE BVI4DIN6 PERMii � � � i G� I C " —'- is is�weo. ni.� n+s roe�.ic wor�s r+o� nw corwEcnous w5r ee aeinr� � ' . i I . ,'.�� -ii .G�� !' � � ry ON iNE PLAN. NO E%G5P11�N5. G . _" - O � I� "_ �S�\� . � � _: � i �J -, �- ry i ' - - � � ARGHITEGNRAL SYM80L5 � � � i � MRGHITEGNRAL SYMBOLS � . � , r I' _ !� i � � � � z h - � ii v , C� � _- �`, a' �isnNs wva. ro �aenniH I I � I 0 i ��.� -.-�.- cc i� �nwixs �r�rsExce FLOOR_ _�� ovwvi �ea �� _ - __ - - � � � � � se� !iJ "' � . _— :. . . . � � _ � , n. _,o. __ _ . :., . � ' � � �_ NEW PART�TION Y14LL . i I I ,� � � O z REP2RENL[ NIMBER ' ; I ' :5`-I' -- _ _ ' _- __ �� ^_ _' ".. W"_" "_ ' "x" __" __ - ' __ —" _ L.L� �p � . . ., . . . . :� . _ ___ _"'_ 9ELTIONPEPERErKX i ��N6NMIBER _ _'_______ F%ISTIN6YVJ.lTO@ER2I+AVEO �.. . . - '- '. .. . NN � _ . SNECT NUMOER � . . ., . . • .. . '1 "a � . 5 -C� � c� 4 -y �... � i 'j /. I � o �C •"'•� INDEX OF DRP.WINGS � � J��/' {-- 1 y. . DETAIL RERERENGE � 1 . ' . , I ' � I �'1 •.•.� /1 PRAWIN6 WR�3ER _ ' . . � - -_ `� ��T �� h-OI 51TE P�AN, PFOJCGT DATA . A-O� F�OORMLAN9 ' ' ' ' . . A-09 ELEVATIdJS —�-- ' . . - .,�. w.__ —�---,-. I 2LL'YATION REPERENCE � 3HE@T' NUMBER� Aq4 9CGTIONS —_ � il F . � ' U A-09 DEfAl44 � � _ � y : 7 »�—� � i ROOM NUMBER M43iE12 EEPDW.MM _' u .. � �� __ 3-0� 91HL4'MiP1 tiENBYsy ry0iE5 ANO UOOfy�WIWJOWS . � � DOORNIMBER �D 9-03 9iWGNRAl. DEfAILS . V � � L/ JI � IIYV �� IV � � a. YUNooW NIMBER � �' N O RT H v' ~ eroi e�ecrwc,c� / r�cnwc,a� / w-u reu+e � � 'M g ti � ok T-- —. 51 'i'E PLAN EXHIBIT "A„ i i--� � � � .. sca. e� ve^=r-o° -- DR 2002-3Q MCUP 02- 15 '—' —L_L� w Cr � I 21216 COLD SPRING LANE Yn 02 D30B NOVEMBER 26, 2002 ,,,„a „��,Ew Q -- Oi '--'— -- i.mia� xw i __ _ '_'_ "'____--__ � � ..__— . ____,. , �_ -____ _ ___________ ___ _ __ _ _ _ ._ -- ---- ----------- -- ----- � Ail£� . � � �� ;�� ra <�_r <>-- �� i r,� �: iv_�, � c> m�� s_c� N r-�� N i > H w a t� � � a��' �� 5,�-,• ------- ------ - s�� -- --2a�_a sie° -------- � Moa -� � 9 I�'-II I/1r' _ ��oy AtH . � . -- a , _.�.'� _'_.— � Iq�...61/2" _'._ "J��b'-� 3i..q�� ' � . . a5'� 3Y I , . � _ . �. S . Q � — _ _�� ___ __-. —_ � , . p 19'_9 814" � � � � �+ '. _ ' - — _. _— -- � i _ - ,-_2 I �'_ � ' _ "1'-R I S° _,� b'-1 IM_ I a � qr , (i � I � � . ac�i a �i � ��. _ ____ ' " " " _ " _ _ __ _ _ _ '. f _� _ _ - II '-II I%��i __ _. ` _ - ___ - _ _ _. _'-- _ __ - - - _ _ _ v f2-I . __" 12-EJ 9._9. i I � � I�e �i Q j _ '�-I I I/2" e B41 I :Y" '� �"� � I '� m I �I O - ____ --_.___ -- I . nC� O (� &a - r �c___ � � i io-a � M STER 13EDR OM � _ i i. � C� i ry � , v r�_e siu��`5•-i s� s�..i sin^ a�-in vv° 2'�`� 2" � �; � __ k-� i = . N• . � � -- � a, � �� s--„—�.s�--a�m��a . � i 5 UOY RUOM �;- - �%� nc �v `� --- --- � i 4 � ;� � 'B I � � l'�"� - 12-A 3�_2�� .��.� �_� � - ;U �y � �� FAMII_Y ROOM in ��\ - _ � � Zj � � � f � �� `l�d� ___e I '. I� i� Q v I __ I (� > � i _ u�-o va, —°� -L,� � a v2 -- —� WARK N i � �J ' � ---'--- - ��-a v ^ e�-n �° �. BAT 4. 3 �� _A GLOS� � _ . " ' r �`- — . '� — � �1� . � �L _ — � I 7 i - ---- --- �:� � �� —��I' —� _ , m �, --- i � m i PANTRY � � �_-�- n ' � .. O - -s�._ .� � �� L =-111 i . �._ _ BA7N . �os-n II � j ----- j -� �� 8' _._.1�-�� fEx15�TINs� ^l, �.-�.� -- i . F— 1V 'Ii_B�� , .. i �_� � ry KITCHEN �� G A �� N .. � � � � Z �� (@%I.•TIN6) � 19TIN6 � � � C I � _ �� m I —„�_;,� � -- � �� = arH . � .� ee�oo� z � = w ,., u> � I _ _' ' a�'INra) � I �i ' �� --� �= a�> � I a� � � . ;� __ '_'_ — / I � - .. l � � �� sy � a L� m H�IsrI�pY � - � f I '. � 3 �m , � � I � - _ � - --- 1-=- � ; � � �, _ � � � z � I �_o° q'_ � � � � C , �iJ � � ry � '.�`— . __ _ 6 I (/� " � ' � _ I N I � � i GARAGE r- - a n ��sN�1 I � � . � � � __ ' � � (exisnNs� �e - �n] � :� � � � i [.J7 LIVING RUOM _ i �� . � l�xisntu�) �I::-, _ = i '. _ + � -A - i � _ i i i j �� 0�-5 us„ i — � � i i � j i ` BEDROOM i i i . � � I _—'— '" _____ (E%15TIN6) � I , � +i� h-,�� am�_'_ _— — � I �� 7: �� --�1 � i � � o _. — - - -- - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - ; i � g b i � i � � i i � L _ _ '_ ` _ _ _ _ _ , "_ _ '_ __ - _ __ - _ _ "" _ "' - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ J � i � 93�_�� - __ 10�_y� _ 19,_�� . . � NOfi2TH � � � oi�� vryo2-0308 ' oiuw�x�u ue FI'ZST FL.00R PLAN _ --- I sca.e�va°• r-o^ � ---- -- --- -- - � A- 02 wC � ------ ------------- ___,_..� _ ____ __ _ --_ _ __ '^� ---- --------- ---- -- -- - ------- N� ��g � �--exisriws �wrm�r ��{� Y I';�' 1/ENI. —..—�_ / ' 4 �{{'�� . �\ �..____.___'__._._'.� :�')(4' :�KYLIaNir ___— ___�_..�.��T_�--_� , � ��gA� � I:i" � � � � �$ $pry . E%151'IN6 G01�iW0'51T :iHINuL.E — � ��/J/� c - ' /? ��_ _'" I�" GONIR�51T SHINfiLE ,,,i%�^`�• � — � ��p5g@� : ' _`_ �T�� / r' //� ' vj /' ��.� 1Z-5/H" `\ \� � �� . ��# / � � T � '��\ �� \\ � � � . / �` // � � �/ - ��. �` ' nl;GO {I•IA!a`i W LAISTW6J 9TIKGo (MASH W/ ExISTIN&J -� �� '� \ ` \ ' - / �>� �� i/i�i//�f'_ � .�/ �/�j/�li;> �, ��'`-�-�- � __ _--- �T�� . `\�<\�� \\\\\�\ \ �\\ , �� j //' / / � //// // // � j/ I 9_� A c . � .. - � \.�\\ � \\\�\\\ I � \\. 1. � � j / �///J //JI � � I � �\ \ \ � � i � � � �/ / //l/ /�// l / i/ � /// fi � i �\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ y� \ g � �/ 1 � W / �///� � � �� / �/ � - - ( ��\\ \� \�� • � ;` � i�� ii � � / /�� /� ` i � � � ` \ \ � �� ' � � , ��`�r/��/f-=/i/L ' -� _ _ / ' ___ . - ' ._ _ -_�.__�___��y:\\�� _ . - -��\ ��.�. � . � � � ' . - _ _��_ z_,z.= ,._. z�.�..f_..f.��_,��__ ��_______._�r.��-----� �.�- -- -- , �� _ _ _ _ _ � _ _ __- _� �- �_�° _ _ g�p _ - �'____ �` _ "_ �F9' b VS' __.__- �_-._ a m n k � RI<5H7E4.EVA�TION "� �__ ___J _ __ . �� L�f°TGt.EVATION ' — , ecn�e� va^=r-o� , � —`-------- ------ — . — 3 LA41 SGAI.E� I/4"�Ib" -;'- -_� � � � � C�c �% � �) C�^ � �� 4 . �. 2'X4' SKYIIfaHT ' r, _ GOMP091T SHINfiLE i0 MPSH IW EXISiING � � iT ��. ¢ � �h�r.o.Nh (L � } c' � �. `► EL. ta�:�„ ------ --� — —1�- -�------- - � � o �� m � a � � iC � V 1 °t �� '_t . �; � � b. ___'_....___ � _ � .� by —' � _ _— _ . m � � � h � '� —�'T _ ' _ _ _ _ _ . . __ ._ . .."" _ '" _ ' . '" _ _ _ _ _ ' ' " '_ _ . . -_ _ . . . " _ _ _ _' _ _ ,. _ _ — ST�k.GO (MASHW/ EXISTIhU �— .___.--.—_— —f_s LEVEL OF LO�L 'G "I REF. FIAOR -� �. 4 �L. � O'-O° __�_-_. '— �_., _ _ — ' _ _ _ O_.L.I :� ai _ � _ . _.__��. � .g �, _ _. 19'-IrJ° __'_____ .--.— 25'-6 V2° _'__�— _—_-1�.� �^�;L a[ . � �—_. —_ � 5�" __— ; � +"y �r V . REAR ELEVATION _�.i_u— ^-- - - . --_�T� i � � af .. SGAL61/4"�I'-tl' —.'_ --.--^----_"_.'_"_ _._. �A�] . v �% ; / (_y� Fo 0 �� <� � , � - EXISTIN6 CqMPf�51T SNINbLE i'^� , � l �\ 7.D.P; ._ �"_-_.'-"�__"_ ____-_.__. � � � �� F EL, I6' -i" �._.�___.�-"__,—__^'_'-__ . . ./ _-�_._"_.�____ __�"_ "' __' , _ .. -..._m...m.�-.e.._�..�s..._-_.e.-.��._._._._.oe,..a.�.._o r x _.. _ ._._ . - _.� � , � '. pz .9� � ' S A .�.. � - _ .— _ . P . � . , . _—. ... _ _'__._.. m . v "-__.—'__. -_.-.___._... . . � ¢ m ,��RE� �_h. FLOOR _"'_._ .__. ___.__ _.'__ ��._�.� i = � � � � E`I L, r p'-0" ._._' __�- _ -.. .��-...._...-."'_ _ __ ___ .v___� � ' '_�. . ___�_� Y.� '_ '- ' x o . i ._._.. IB'..g�� '____ _� I4'-4" _._.v , � � � --..-'---- --`---�_' _ B'7'_5 �/2� , xa[ct c'twi I� �' . _. _' '_.._'___._____"__'__._�_.__._ 02_03Ufl � �r�aNr tt_�vA�noN � °""°��c""�" 9GALE� I/4.e ��-0�i ..�_._..._._—_._ �._.___"____'__.-..�_�__�_..__�� ,_.L. ' 1 � , L7 Q ' �3 � — — , . , ,_. . ------- -- — ---� ----- — ----- ,� �a� ry� � - . . • • • • • • - � • • • : • ` • • _ g , 'i . I(� , K 4 �Y ' ; � � , � ". I•. :r�JR, , � � ., � �� ... � 3 �n:n• ,.. k 1 �' "� � �. .., } . � =,:y� � �� , � a r � � � �� ) � � - .-� .d,� " t..,�' ,� '�' ,x � !; 's � . �� :� '�' � �, i� : � ,r . -�_ � ,S� > , . . .. � N, et € ' , ' � . '�„ � .. _ t .� : � " _,s, �'� � � � .: -r�'. � ''�`` -�� , ,.x. ;-�"?�:tdC �,!.p4 � , '.� .;+ttat++.i • • • • • • • • • • � � i r� ),�. � � ,: . �i' . �t.'. } �. � � . •t-� �. _ .-�,� � �u .. . ` h .#.k �' �r �.- /7i - S�� y ' .� �� N ;' i ..�I ' I� w� ' „ . ,. . ' ..tU � ,.,K . T" � � � ��.. 1 . .E`e , � � ' , . . �.. :�: ' �� . � r""" � i �``� � �` -'�� . . ! I .... - - , — , � . � , � . , i x , . � ��. � -di i s »--_ -' , � .,, `��.��,�` � re , �.�;� � ��y N " ' :� � 2 , �� -�„' r �7�.�,,.� y, � � � � �� v�� ' � { c " { � �� .,i ,� {k' .� ,t �.�., .��` "`$�ia . ,-�-.�„� ! � ``" �• '�?""� � ' ` �� . �r, y�.._ ar�, r} ;,� fi �,xf �,r,�yy�, : • • • � i `� ti s � �� t � � �, ,� � ' � ��I �,� .,,,,, r g 's+'"` -� — i- � ° �` � 11 �'"� , - .� t� h �: � m �� , � . � � � I �� f ; n � „ � � t t �� , � " a ' : � � � � � , � ��s; , ; � p �� n a�''":. �=�- r ;_}°` � r =;Y ; , �, � '�;; + s .�. � � , � . l � tir , � �� - � �! �� / � , �. .r . i � � � . ��" ; ; � '�.1uS� � '' � 7' , • ' • ' • ' ' • • ' • — • ' • • • • � Q , � ��' � a ° �- F ^ O v U a up � °" z � o � � o °� o �, N � ¢ H d w ox W � a, pa„ � � �, � a ao 0 a � A � '� u, p z Z, U .. v�i O Z � � � o z wz � � Q oa ° o = w a Q � - � Q p Q � p, � PU, � Va x � Z � z0 � � � o � ° �" w �' � z ° F � � ¢ z � W 0 � � H � U _ � � � w `� aw• a � w '� � � ^ � � a �¢ 3 � 3 °" � c� � o a p�, w o Zz W a -. U q X d � Q � �j h � � >' d x U , .a F U ¢ 5 a �' � z o � � � � z z � �v z o � o '� •a W � � � c� � cq� A � � � d o� '� � ',��, Z o d a, � Z °.� �{-� S �y � wp N '^ � . Q � O f P o N N U � Q � ,-1 F O d � � � � � .�a, N N N N . O � � U � Q � U W � � � � . � W `_ � o r' �' "� Q p 'a "Y a •o m r`n a Q a a a � � N N � � w a a � � �„ N � ,.� � `n q ^a � ,� o 0 0' - . � a Q a � a o c-i o Q 4p �y p `p" g �' � N � O S oo N � �.. ` +n r -� M � O � O O � N N � � P� U o � o �e�.t Na �c7 4 N N � N °1 4 � F �q Q U > ¢ # r� o N p o p� o �o � � U � V U� U H 6 � G g a � wN � � QH p 'L`' A p �, � yN , � d � � V V>� o � '��" 7 V � � H � U W b0 d+ "� m �y` � G - u U � V t> b v � �' 'a ° w�, z � � z � a H a � � o � '� w � � � o ° � a o � w � r,� g � U ,� o �a a � w �4 '^ � ¢ � v, � B Q Z, w >, � �, � � '� d ° o � � d P� '� � � dc � .�i°. � C�. � � � � � �mva � � � O � z '�"+ �wU^., F„ a; U d � Z A+ � c� � � Q o � � cE'"i � � U N V? � N V � � � � qx � � � p" Zq, � � �'- o � 'H '� pG �,,� � � � O � � g. � F d � 'z 6 � $ oG4. � �" �. �+' Z �j � °� ^e�i �' 'x. � U � +�`�. Wy+ C7 .V.J `x+ " �° �z, U � � C� UW m O d pW, q � E-� � � zo aa' � � $ E" �° qUw '� w � xaa oN � � W � aa i i i i i � i 0 o O o O O o d Q ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ (� � U U � U U � � �qp QO ¢ O ¢ O � O � O W F W F W F W F W F W F W F W d W Q w d w Q W ¢ W Q w ¢ � � � � � � ° � ° � ° � ° � ° � o � � z � z � � � z oz oz z � z � z � � � z � z � z �, wz u, z wz wz wz � z wz Q p A O A O a O Q O a O Q O ' W � W � W � W .H-. G� � �i.l � W � � qLl � Lql �yqGl � pCa � Cq] Fc' Aq � q H <t Q ¢ C d d Q T� z C7 C7 C7 z p z p C7 C5 C7 z p z p C7 z 0 z 0 z p . � 2, Z -� z �"" W E' W Z Z z z W F" W Z z GL F'" W z [!. �. v� v� �n � C7 � C7 �n r� v� Q C7 � C7 � Q C7 � C7 Q C7 . � W W W U � ..V. z �w W W � U � U .z., W Uz V Z U2 - .. Q U . U U .-1 F• ,,,7 F U U U a F ,j F U ,_1 � ,:a � ,i E" . Q a a a °y¢ 3 ¢"� 3 a�'. w a � � � � � � � a ¢ a � � °¢' 3 °y¢ 3 a 0.a' 3 �a3 p¢' 3 w a � o Q � z � QQ � o 0 z � za o � � z� �" z � a ° z ° aA ao o � � � � � 6 '� w � w � � a � �' � �a � F � � W z � �' �� ' � ¢ x � a � � W W ,� z F � z ' o � '� � � �' � � �° Q � ° o Q �' � � w � � � � �. > � �� o�+ z � H � � �d � x � 3 ap� u Q °" U Q /-� r-� Q CG L� Z. Q N N Q S O o� O ao S � E- o � w w .� R�i � � �N M N b N r O � . � � (n F U R�i F N N � N N ^' N N N N N � F � �..7 `a x � dC � � � � � .a .a � � � a `i¢ �¢ .a a a A Q A .xa a �¢ �a a Q � � �o � "" rn o o � ,n ,-, �` �o � : N a o a, .-. o r� O O M N a N N N O � N N � N � N N N p O O O O O � � O O � O $ � h O O . O � � N � N O N O O N O Np, . U � F A � U U U � � E�".., U q q � q V �� 0 0 L � x ¢ U �%j . O ^n H � `d s - � Z :o .c CJ ... �, a � � y Q � ;, 07 � x � `� .:^ � E'; = n' � � a� a ^m O q v� v_ Wc z g � .a � - u cu V V ` F ;° � v o p u" � � � � ° � > � A „ . °' a' a� � u, � � a "W� � >' W " Qq ,-. � ai � :a o "'1 U � c? �v z °� �.W, v {� -� . � � .' wN ,Z � Wx W � � � � � � z ¢ � wa � � " S R' ¢ .Ea C� a " fk tC Q WQ' °o '� � ^ z 'd p" ..^. a j A+ ., a '� c p `C q ' o •- U � s U � ?� rn W c � ' a � � o U � � 7+ _' > m Z ro v� ^ �a � Q�` B o • � C� d Z ^ Wy O z cx m � � �4 � d �v �a W 'A z � O C �" •`� R: `a id 4' W Q `..C', w a> a� �-1 W W F �. t (�7 v rWn U C7 ^ W o � � � W ^e�n ~' �' o o ?? W :? d o o E z o O � 3 � ¢ � � � � F c� � U s � c O U � � � a�i � c � c � o a z oW, � x � � � CGw � �C � �..1 � � Q � U z � a � v� � � a' H � � � � V CITY OF DIAMOND BAR NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING AND AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ) ' On November 26 , 2002, at 7 :00 P.M. , the Diamond Bar Planning Commission will hold a Study Session and regular meeting at the South Coast Quality Management District, 21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California. Items for consideration are listed on the attached agenda. I, Stella Marquez, declare as follows : I am employed by the City of Diamond Bar, Community and Development Services Department. On November 21 , 2002, I posted a copy of the Notice for the Study Session and Regular Meeting of the Diamond Bar Planning Commission, to be held on November 26 , 2002, at each of the following locations : South Coast Quality Management Heritage Park District Auditorium 2900 Brea Canyon Road 21865 East Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Diamond Bar, CA 91765 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and conect. Executed on November 21 , 2002, at Diamond Bar, California. � Stella Marquez Community and Development Services Dept. g:\\a�davitposting.doc CITY OF DIAMOND BAR NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING AND AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ) I , Stella Marquez, declare as follows : On July 9 , 2019 , the Diamond Bar Planning Commission will hold a Regular Meeting at 6 : 30 p . m . at City Hall , Windmill Community Room , 21810 Copley Drive , Diamond Bar, California . I am employed by the City of Diamond Bar. On July 5 , 2019 , a copy of the Planning Commission Agenda was posted at the following locations , South Coast Quality Management Heritage Park ' District Auditorium 2900 Brea Canyon Road 21865 East Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Diamond Bar Library City of Diamond Bar - City Hall 21800 Copley Drive 21810 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Diamond Bar, CA 91765 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on July 5 , 2019 , at Diamond Bar, California . Stella Marquez Community Development Dept. CD:�zstella\affidavitposting.doc