Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
04/12/2011
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA April 12, 2011 7:00 P.M. FILE COPY 3 " S. :D -e• South Coast Air Quality Management District Government Center Building Auditorium 21865 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Chairman Vice Chairman Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Jack Shah Kwang Ho Lee Jimmy Lin Steve Nelson Tony Torng Copies of staff reports or other written documentation relating to agenda items are on file in the Planning Division of the Community Development Department, located at 21825 Copley Drive, and are available for public inspection. If you have questions regarding an agenda item, please call (909) 839-7030 during regular business hours. Written materials distributed to the Planning Commission within 72 hours of the Planning Commission meeting are available for public inspection immediately upon distribution in the City Clerk's office at 21825 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California, during normal business hours. In an effort to comply with the requirements of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the City of Diamond Bar requires that any person in need of any type of special equipment, assistance or accommodation(s) in order to communicate at a City public meeting must inform the Community Development Department at (909) 839-7030 a minimum of 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting. Please refrain from smoking, eating or The City of Diamond Bar uses recycled paper drinking in the Auditorium and encourages you to do the same City of Diamond Bar Planning Commission MEETING RULES PUBLIC INPUT The meetings of the Diamond Bar Planning Commission are open to the public. A member of the public may address the Commission on the subject of one or more agenda items and/or other items of which are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Diamond Bar Planning Commission. A request to address the Commission should be submitted in writing at the public hearing, to the Secretary of the Commission. As a general rule, the opportunity for public comments will take place at the discretion of the Chair. However, in order to facilitate the meeting, persons who are interested parties for an item may be requested to give their presentation at the time the item is called on the calendar. The Chair may limit individual public input to five minutes on any item; or the Chair may limit the total amount of time allocated for public testimony based on the number of people requesting to speak and the business of the Commission. Individuals are requested to conduct themselves in a professional and businesslike manner. Comments and questions are welcome so that all points of view are considered prior to the Commission making recommendations to the staff and City Council. In accordance with State Law (Brown Act), all matters to be acted on by the Commission must be posted at least 72 hours prior to the Commission meeting. In case of emergency or when a subject matter arises subsequent to the posting of the agenda, upon making certain findings, the Commission may act on item that is not on the posted agenda. INFORMATION RELATING TO AGENDAS AND ACTIONS OF THE COMMISSION Agendas for Diamond Bar Planning Commission meetings are prepared by the Planning Division of the Community Development Department. Agendas are available 72 hours prior to the meeting at City Hall and the public library, and may be accessed by personal computer at the number below. Every meeting of the Planning Commission is recorded on cassette tapes and duplicate tapes are available for a nominal charge. ADA REQUIREMENTS A cordless microphone is available for those persons with mobility impairments who cannot access the public speaking area. The service of the cordless microphone and sign language interpreter services are available by giving notice at least three business days in advance of the meeting. Please telephone (909) 839-7030 between 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m., Monday through Thursday, and 7:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Friday. HELPFUL PHONE NUMBERS Copies of Agenda, Rules of the Commission, General Agendas (909) 839-7030 email: info(c)ci diamond-bar.ca.us Cassette Tapes of Meetings (909) 839-7030 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, April 12, 2011 AGENDA CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 p.m. Next Resolution No. 2011-07 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: 1. ROLL CALL: COMMISSIONERS: Chairman Jack Shah, Vice Chairman Kwang Ho Lee, Jimmy Lin; Steve Nelson, Tony Torng 2. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is the time and place for the general public to. address the members of the Planning Commission on any item that is within their jurisdiction, allowing the public an opportunity to speak on non-public hearing and non -agenda items. Please complete a Speaker's Card for the recording Secretary (completion of this form is voluntary) There is a five-minute maximum time limit when addressing the Planning Commission. I * * * * * * * 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Chairman 4. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following items listed on the consent calendar are considered routine and are approved by a single motion. Consent calendar items may be removed from the agenda by request of the Commission only: 4.1 Minutes of Regular Meeting: March 22, 2011. 5. OLD BUSINESS: None. 6. NEW BUSINESS: None. 7. PUBLIC HEARING(S): 7.1 Development Review No 2007-25 and Tree Permit No. 2007-06 — Request for a one-year time extension of the Planning Commission's approval for a new 9,513 square -foot, three story single-family residential project on a 51,401 gross square foot (1.18 acre) lot. The project site is zoned Rural Residential (RR) with a consistent underlying General Plan land use designation. The project was approved on February 10, 2009, with a two year time frame to obtain building permits and begin construction; however Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.60.050 authorizes the Planning Commission to grant a one-year time extension. APRIL 12, 2011 PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA Project Address: 2706 Indian Creek Road Property Owner: Basant Bhatia 17753 Via San Jose Rowland Heights, CA 91748 Applicant: Pete Volbeda 180 N. Benson Ave., Suite D Upland, CA 91786 Environmental Determination: This project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on that assessment, the City has determined the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to the provisions of Article 19 under Section 15303(a) (New Construction of One Single -Family Residence) of the CEQA Guidelines. No further environmental review is required to extend the time limit for the approved project. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve a one-year time extension for Development Review No. 2007-25 and Tree Permit No. 2007-06, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the draft resolution. 7.2 Development Review PL 2010-289 — Under the authority of Diamond Bar Municipal Section 22.48, the applicant, Stuart Beck, and the property owner, Hai Nguyen, are requesting approval to demolish an existing residence and construct a new 7,432 square -foot single family residence on a 1.88 gross acre (82,015 square -foot) lot. The subject property is zoned Rural Residential (RR) with a consistent underlying General Plan land use designation. Project Address: 3010 Wagon Train Ln. Property Owner: Hai Nguyen 3057 Windmill Dr. Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Applicant: Stuart Beck 2915 Redhill Ave., Suite G102 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Environmental Determination: This project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on that assessment, the City has determined the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to the provisions of Article 19 under Sections 15301(1)(2) (Demolition of a Single Family Residence) and APRIL 12, 2011 PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA 15303(a) (Construction of a New Single Family Residence) of the CEQA Guidelines. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review No. PL 2010-289, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the draft resolution. 7.3 Conditional Use Permit No. PL 2010-355 — Under the authority of Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.58, the applicant is requesting approval to remove an existing Edison street light pole located on Diamond Bar Blvd., public rights-of-way, north of Tin Dr., and replace it with a similar light pole equipped with cellular telecommunications antennas and associated ground - mounted equipment. Project Address: Public rights-of-way on Diamond Bar Boulevard and 760 S. Diamond Bar Boulevard Property Owner: City of Diamond Bar 21825 Copley Dr. Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Applicant: Sequoia Deployment Services on Behalf of T -Mobile Monica Moretta One Venture, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92618 Environmental Determination: This project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on that assessment, the City has determined the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to the provisions of Article 19 Section 15303 (New Construction of Small Structures) of the CEQA Guidelines. No further environmental review is required. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit No. PL 2010-355, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the draft resolution. 8. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS / INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 9. STAFF COMMENTS / INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 9.1 Public Hearing dates for future projects: APRIL 12, 2011 PAGE 4 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA 10. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING: CITY BIRTHDAY PARTY: CITY COUNCIL MEETING: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING: 11. ADJOURNMENT: Thursday, April 14, 2011 - 7:00 p.m. Government Center/SCAQMD Hearing Board Room, 21865 Copley Drive Saturday, April 16, 2011 Pantera Park. 738 Pantera Drive Tuesday, April 19, 2011 - 6:30 p.m. Government Center/SCAQMD Auditorium 21865 Copley Drive Tuesday, April 26, 2011 — 7:00 p.m. Government Center/SCAQMD Auditorium 21865 Copley Drive Thursday, April 28, 2010-7:00 p.m. Government Center/SCAQMD Hearing Board Room, 21865 Copley Drive MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 22, 2011 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Torng called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in the South Coast Air Quality Management District/Government Center Auditorium, 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Commissioner Lee led the Pledge of Allegiance. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Kwang Ho Lee, Jimmy Lin, Steve Nelson, Vice Chairman Jack Shah, and Chairman Tony Torng. Also present: Greg Gubman, Community Development Director; Brad Wohlenberg, Assistant City Attorney; Grace Lee, Senior Planner; Natalie Tobon, Planning Technician; and Stella Marquez, Senior Administrative Assistant. Also Present: John Douglas, Housing Element Consultant 2. REORGANIZATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION: a) Selection of Chairman: C/Torng nominated Commissioner Shah to serve as Chairman of the Planning Commission. C/Lee seconded the nomination. There were no other nominations offered. Commissioner Shah was unanimously elected to serve as Chairman of the Planning Commission by the following Roll Call vote: C/Lee Yes C/Linn Yes C/Nelson Yes C/Shah Yes C/Torng Yes b) Selection of Vice Chairman: C/Torng nominated C/Lee to serve as Vice Chairman of the Planning Commission. C/Nelson seconded the nomination. There were no other nominations offered. Commissioner Lee was elected to serve as Vice Chairman of the Planning Commission by the following Roll Call vote: MARCH 22, 2011 PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION C/Lee abstain C/Linn Yes C/Nelson Yes C/Torng Yes Chair/Shah Yes 3. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: None 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: C/Torng moved, C/Nelson seconded, to move Agenda Item 8.2 prior to Agenda Item 8.1. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS NOES: COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS CONSENT CALENDAR: Lin, Nelson, Torng, VC/Lee, Chair/Shah None None 5.1 Minutes of the Regular Meeting of February 8, 2011. C/Nelson moved, VC/Lee seconded, to approve the February 8, 2011, minutes as presented. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: 6. OLD BUSINESS: 7 NEW BUSINESS COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: None None PUBLIC HEARINGS: Lin, Nelson, Torng, VC/Lee, Chair/Shah None None 8.2 General Plan Amendment No. PL 2011-4312008-2014 Housing Element Update) — Pursuant to state law, the proposed project is the update to the City's General Plan Housing Element for the 2008-2014 planning period. PROPERTY ADDRESS: PROPERTY OWNER: Citywide Citywide APPLICANT: City of Diamond Bar MARCH 22, 2011 PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION CDD/Gubman introduced John Douglas, JHD Consulting, who presented staffs report. Mr. Douglas stated that in January 2011, the City received a letter from the State of California indicating that if the City adopts the Housing Element in the form before the Planning Commission this evening, it will meet all of the requirements of state law and will be certified. He elaborated on the certification process and CDD/Gubman presented information regarding the proposed and potential rezone sites contained within the Housing Element. Mr. Douglas talked about special needs housing consisting of "Emergency Shelters," 'Transitional and Supportive Housing," and 'Reasonable Accommodation for Persons with Disabilities." On April 19 staff expects the City Council to review this item and following Council adoption of the Housing Element, staff will move into the implementation phase which will include the zone changes and code amendments. CDD/Gubman recommended that the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of General Plan Amendment No. PL 2011-43 (2008-2014 Housing Element update). C/Nelson asked for an explanation of "transitional and supportive housing" and Mr. Douglas responded that it refers to housing that is designated for persons that are at -risk" of homelessness. C/Nelson asked if it had anything to do with people with criminal records or substance abuse issues and Mr. Douglas said he believed those kinds of programs could have persons with these sorts of problems that are often considered a disability. C/Nelson said he recalled that there was some discussion about the number and distance apart of some of these facilities and asked if that was included in the Housing Element. CDD/Gubman explained that there was a Code Amendment done for Group Homes' last year which established distance criteria for sober living facilities and boarding facilities and similar types of uses the City would need to provide for minimally. Emergency shelters are not part of the criteria for group homes, substance abuse and parolee probationary housing which are different from the items being discussed within the Housing Element, and are, in addition, subject to discretionary review. The emergency shelters would be for persons who are destitute and what would be envisioned for these emergency shelters would be churches such as Calvary Chapel, for example. While not limited to churches, staff believes those institutions in Diamond Bar have facilities that would be the most logical locations to accommodate emergency housing needs. VC/Lee asked what kind of housing was contemplated for multi -family units. Mr. Douglas responded that the law does not specify whether it needs to be MARCH 22, 2011 PAGE 4 PLANNING COMMISSION apartments or condos but the law does say that cities cannot specify that it only be condos. The law has to allow multi -family rental housing. What is presented in the Housing Element is exclusively residential and does not include commercial. C/Lin asked if "target quota" meant the City did not have to comply and Mr. Douglas said he believed the best answer was that the state legislature understands that cities do not have total control over the development process. There are certain regulatory requirements that have to be in place in order for housing to be built, including affordable housing. State law holds cities responsible for the things over which they have control. Cities can adopt regulations but if there is not a developer that wishes to build under those regulations it will not happen except in situations such as a Redevelopment Agency wherein the City could act as a developer. C/Lin said he was curious about whether the demographics for 2007 were substantially different from the 2010 census data. Mr. Douglas said staff does not know yet because the 2010 census information that has been released is the most basic of information and there is a lot of other data that will come out over the next couple of years. When talking about the City's "fair -share" needs that drives this process, it is good to remember that those needs were established in 2007 by SCAG based on the growth forecast and the demographics they knew at that time. When compiling information, the cities cannot go back and revisit or change those numbers. Those were the numbers that were set in concrete and that is what the cities have to live with until the next set of numbers become available. C/Lin asked if Diamond Bar currently has high-rise units and CDD/Gubman said that at present, the City has two-story units and has nothing that would be considered mid or high rise. He believed that to achieve 30 -units per acre (a 50 percent increase over the current maximum density) would necessitate minimum three-story developments. Mr. Douglas said he has seen many projects that are three-story projects that are about 30 -units per acre. C/Lin asked if affordable housing means subsidized housing and Mr. Douglas responded "generally, yes." C/Lin asked how such units would be subsidized and Mr. Douglas said that it comes back to what was being discussed earlier, that cities do not have total control over the development process. Cities such as Diamond Bar certainly do not have lots of excess General Fund money to subsidize housing which is one of the reasons this Housing Element is referred to as a "planning" target and not a "quota." Cities that do not have funds that they can devote to housing means that the only way affordable housing can be built is through a subsidy from some MARCH 22, 2011 PAGE 5 PLANNING COMMISSION other source such as the federal government, state government, redevelopment agencies, etc. The legal framework that cities work in understands that a lot of things have to line up in order for subsidized affordable housing to be built and cities being held responsible for those portions of it that they have control over which is primarily zoning and development standards. Mr. Douglas further explained that typically, the way affordable housing is built is most often by non-profit developers. If, for example, a non-profit developer was interested and could assemble the sources of subsidy funds necessary to provide such a product, they would come to the City, submit an application, go through the development review process, etc., and underthose circumstances the Citywould not be required to contribute any money to the project. C/Torng asked if the City had to notify the City of Industry and the Water District as property owners before proposing those properties within the Housing Element. Mr. Douglas responded that the City of Industry was notified through the Housing Element process as an adjacent jurisdiction. All surrounding communities are notified of the proposed General Plan Amendment. When the City moves forward to the zone change stage of the process, certainly the property owner would be notified through the typical notification process. Certainly the City of Industry would be notified and have an opportunity to come and comment and as the property owner, the City of Industry would make the final decision about whatdevelopmentto pursue on those properties. If the City of Industry were to decide not to pursue any development at this time, there is nothing in the Housing Element or the zoning that would require or override the City of Industry's desire. C/Torng felt that potentially there would be a major population increase, additional traffic, etc., if 400 plus units were built in Tres Hermanos, for example and most likely no one would complain because there are no residents in the area so these sites are likely rendered redundant in the future. Mr. Douglas said the zone changes that are referenced in the Housing Element will not happen with adoption of this element because that is a separate process that would come at a later time and will come back to the Planning Commission and City Council for further consideration at which time there would be a thorough environmental review of traffic, noise, air- quality, and all other issues investigated through the environmental review process. C/Torng asked if a Specific Plan would be developed for this type of development. ACA/Wohlenberg stated that his office looked at the issue of the environmental review as well and at this point in the process it is too speculative to come up with the information the City would need to make environmental determinations because at this point no one knows how many units there will be and how many trips per day those units will generate so MARCH 22, 2011 PAGE 6 PLANNING COMMISSION those decisions, by necessity, have to be put off to a later stage where things get more specific. C/Torng again asked if a Specific Plan would be developed for this kind of a location when the site is rezoned. CDD/Gubman said that was a possibility. The portion of Tres Hermanos that lies within Diamond Bar is about 700 acres so one scenario would be to do a Specific Plan for all of Tres Hermanos that would include the parcels that are specifically being considered for a zone change. In fact, the City approached HCD with the idea that there would be an overlay over the entirety of Tres Hermanos that would state that the planning for Tres Hermanos shall be in the form of a Specific Plan and that Specific Plan shall include program elements to have an affordable housing component among the entire palette of uses that the 700 acres could be planned for. The HCD came back to the City and said they would expect the City to complete a Specific Plan in an unreasonably short period of time so although he believes a Specific Plan is the best strategy for Tres Hermanos, the only approach that HCD would accept in the Housing Element was for the City to look at rezoning specific properties within Tres Hermonos. Staff can comply with that and follow through with the rezoning. The City of Industry can say thank you very much for rezoning our property, but we have no interest in developing it and we have a big plan that we will look into in the future. CDD/Gubman said that C/Torng made a good observation and felt it was likely that all of Tres Hermanos would be master planned and this would become one component of that master plan. But if that does not happen Diamond Bar has satisfied its obligation by rezoning at least 15'/2 acres. C/Lin asked for confirmation that adoption of the Housing Element as part of the General Plan update would provide that the land use map for the City of Diamond Bar would identify this area as a high-density 30 -unit per acre land use and ACA/Wohlenberg responded that Chair was correct. Chair further commented that this adoption would not provide legal right for development. ACA/Wohlenberg said that an applicant would still have to do a zone change and bring a project forward for consideration and other steps would have to take place before anything could be built. VC/Lee asked if the City would have to go back to the drawing board if the City of Industry said thanks but no thanks to this amendment. CDD/Gubman said that the City of Industry would not have any veto authority. The City Council is the lawmaker in Diamond Bar and the City of Industry could object to the rezoning but it is the City Council that makes the decision on land -use matters in the City. The City of Industry could have the ultimate veto power by electing not to develop the property at all or as the property owner, they could elect to develop it at a lower density than what would be allowed. For example, if the City of Industry develops housing but it isnot at 30 -units per MARCH 22, 2011 PAGE 7 PLANNING COMMISSION acre, then that puts Diamond Bar in the position to have to locate other land to compensate for that shortfall that can no longer be accommodated on the site. VC/Lee asked if when submitting a plan does the City have to have an alternative site or is one site okay? Mr. Douglas reiterated that the way the law works is that the City is required to identify enough sites in the Housing Elements that can accommodate the City's need. So the sites that staff has shown the Commission tonight would accomplish that goal. When this gets to the City Council, the Council could decide those were not good sites and ask staff to find or consider other sites. But for purposes of satisfying the requirements, staff believes that what is in the proposed amendment satisfies the requirements. There is another related portion of state law that CDD/Gubman alluded to and that is if these sites were to be developed for something other than housing or for low density housing, the housing would then be required to amend the Housing Element to identify other sites that would satisfy the City's needs. VC/Lee asked if the emergency shelter was required to accommodate so many people a certain number of square feet per acre. Mr. Douglas explained that when staff comes back with the ordinance to implement the emergency shelter zone, the City has the authority to establish a variety of standards and regulations that would cover those emergency shelters and it includes things like the maximum number of beds, parking, landscaping, lighting, management plan, etc. VC/Lee asked if transitional housing meant that no one lived there on a permanent basis. Mr. Douglas said VC/Lee was correct. Transitional Housing is typically. a limited term. The difference between Emergency Shelter and Transitional Housing is usually about six months. Typically, an Emergency Shelter would not allow anyone to stay there longer than six months; Transitional or Supportive Housing often times could be a year or two and it is intended for families as opposed to a group home situation. Transitional Housing is typically for families in a single family home, condo or apartment unit and it is typically run through non-profit agencies that have standards such as clean and sober, zero tolerance for drug and alcohol abuse to be a participant in the program and it is a very different situation than some of the group homes the Commission discussed about six months ago. MARCH 22, 2011 PAGE 8 PLANNING COMMISSION VC/Lee asked if the distance criteria applied. Mr. Douglas reiterated that cities cannot establish any regulations on transitional and supportive housing units that do not apply to the entire City for a regular single family home. So unless a City had separation requirements for single family homes which they do not, then cities cannot establish any kind of separation requirements for transitional and supportive units either. VC/Lee asked if when this is identified, the City has to address the improvements to infrastructure to those areas. Mr. Douglas reiterated that those issues would be part of the process to review the zone changes during the environmental review process that looks at the site-specific details because as ACA/Wohlenberg mentioned, that level of detail is not yet available. Staff has identified a relatively large area that contains quite a bit more land than needed to meet the requirements for rezoning so as the City goes through the process to identify exactly which areas are appropriate to be rezoned that review of infrastructure, traffic and so forth will take place. Chair/Shah opened the public hearing. With no one present who wished to speak on this matter, Chair/Shah closed the public hearing. C/Torng moved, VC/Lee seconded, to recommend City Council approval of General Plan Amendment No. PL 2011-43 (2008-2014 Housing Element update). Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Nelson, Torng, VC/Lee, Chair/Shah NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Lin ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None C/Lin said he voted "no" because this is a target and not a quota which means to him that the City does not have to follow the state's instructions or requirements and when he was in another area of politics he had an unsatisfactory experience with affordable housing. It can cause a lot of fiscal problems for the City because the tax it receives is not close to paying for the services provided to high-density housing. 8.1 Variance No. PL 2010-422 — Under the authority of Development Code Section 22.54, the applicant, Gordon T. Myers and property owner, Steven Chu requested approval of variances to allow a swimming pool and a six-foot high fence within the front setback of a single family residence. The lot is zoned Rural Residential (RR) with an underlying General Plan land use MARCH 22, 2011 PAGE 9 PLANNING COMMISSION designation of Rural Residential. PROJECT ADDRESS: PROPERTY OWNER: APPLICANT: 2615 Braided Mane Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Steven Chu 2615 Braided Mane Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Gordon T. Myers Elegant Pools 31200 Landau Boulevard Cathedral City, CA 92234 C/Lin recused himself from consideration of this project because he owns property within the radius notification requirement and left the meeting. PT/Tobon presented staff's report and recommended Planning Commission denial of Variance No. PL 2010-422, based on the Findings of Fact. Staff has concluded that three of the five findings required to grant the variances cannot be made. VC/Lee asked why staff brought a request to the Planning Commission to deny a Variance. ACA/Wohlenberg responded that if an application is received for a variance there needs to be a decision made and that decision has to be made by the Planning Commission. Staff conducts its analysis and brings forth a recommendation to the Planning Commission but the Planning Commission has to ultimately make a yes or no decision on the Variance application. VC/Lee said in his experience with several other cities, the Variance was not processed before the Planning Commission. Are those cities wrong or is Diamond Bar too accommodating? ACA/Wohlenberg said he was not sure what those cities' processes would be but in all of the jurisdictions in which he works, an application may go forward with a recommendation of denial and generally, applicants like to avoid that because it tends to be a recommendation that carries significant weight with the Planning Commission. He has seen agencies encourage applicants to make changes so that staff does not have to put a denial recommendation on the project but ultimately, if the applicant wants it to move forward with the denial application, that is what staff will do. MARCH 22, 2011 PAGE 10 PLANNING COMMISSION C/Torng said he knows "The Country Estates" decision is irrelevant to the City's decision but he asked if the "The Country Estates" denied this project. PT/Tobon responded that "The Country Estates" approved the project. Chair/Shah opened the public hearing. Ron Stubna, Landscape Architect for the proposed project, stated that about eight months ago his firm was approached by the owner, Steven Chu who purchased the home six or seven years ago. Mr. Chu was not the person who rebuilt the home. As Mr. Chu has remodeled the home they have decided to add other amenities. The patio has shifted and is severely cracked so Mr. Chu asked his firm to design a new patio, pool, spa, barbecue, etc. At that point, Mr. Chu was not aware of the front yard issue because the pool is set to the side and toward the rear of the house. As this progressed through the association approval and approached the City, he and Mr. Chu learned that they would have to go through this Variance process. There are hedges along the front of the property which have been in existence long before Mr. Chu bought the property and those hedges do a very good job of screening where the pool would be. Even without those hedges, there is about eight feet of landscaping that can be used to screen the pool from the street. Braided Mane is a cul-de-sac so there are only six residents to the south of this property. Mr. Chu's house is set at a 45 degree angle at the intersection and he believes that is why there is a problem that warrants approval of a Variance. The other design issue of concern was the topography which is a 1:1 slope at the rear of the house and his firm wanted to make certain that that rear area remained in a natural condition. In fact, as part of the reconstruction process, the slope overlooks the canyon and the project will bring a lot of the native plant material back onto that slope to stabilize the slope and blend into the magnificent canyon view. In addition, he has learned that a six-foot high wrought iron fence is not required and they could reduce that to a five-foot high wrought iron fence as required by the building code. "The Country Estates" said that if there was an issue with a view of the pool that they would approve a block wall to completely mask the pool. Between the existing hedge and vegetation planned, there should be sufficient masking. Using an overhead view of the landscape plan, Gordon Myers, owner, Elegant Pools, pointed out the front entrance to the house and the garage door entrance. Because of the way the house is situated, the entrance is actually on the side of the house. Mr. Stubna pointed out that it is quite common to have unique situations with a combination of the topography and positioning of the homes in "The Country Estates" and for whatever reason, the construction of the home allowed for a flat place where the pool is MARCH 22, 2011 PAGE 11 PLANNING COMMISSION planned. He felt it would be an environmental negative to have to put in huge walls which require increased maintenance with natural earth movement, therefore, believes the proposed site is the safest and most convenient place to build the pool. Mr. Myers said this pool is proposed to be 3'/2 feet maximum depth and found the proposed site to be the best and safest location. The pool could be brought within the limits of the side yard setbacks and he believed the concern was whether this was a front yard or a side yard and when facing the property it appears to be on the side yard. Chair/Shah closed the public hearing. VC/Lee asked if staff had any other suggestions for compromise. CDD/Gubman said he believed there was a fundamental policy question that staff asked the Commission to consider and that is whether the applicant should be entitled to a pool, and on this property the only way to achieve that would be to encroach into the setbacks and of course, that leads to the variance request. It is true, given that there is very little flat pad, this area where the pool is proposed being the one viable location, there is no other option for them. So the fundamental question becomes that given this is the only available location for the pool without going through an extraordinary expense to build up a pad area in the rear, is that sufficient to warrant the granting of this variance or, should a pool simply be considered a luxury rather than a right. Either the applicant chooses to make a bigger footprint, or take into account that this is a difficult property and planning needs to take place before any development occurs for the types of the amenities the applicant would like to have within the constraints of the code. Staff would agree that there is no other place on the site to put a pool. But on the other hand, staff does not believe it can make the necessary findings to recommend that the Commission approve this variance. C/Nelson said that several weeks ago he was very concerned about some retaining walls that were not just a little bit above the City's Development Code but a lot above the City's Development Code, He continues to hold the belief that if the City gives variances that are extreme, even though the existing pools in the area that were developed under the County Code, then the City is simply diluting its Development Code. So he will support the denial and not support the approval of the pool because he does not want this City to be a blank check to develop whatever an applicant wants. Chair/Shah said that staff has studied the issues and brought up several concerns, none of which were addressed by the applicant despite the applicant being aware of those concerns. Second, he agrees with C/Nelson that if the City is going to dilute the regulations in place, there is no purpose MARCH 22, 2011 PAGE 12 PLANNING COMMISSION a 10. to having regulations. As an architect, he cannot necessarily agree with all of the arguments made by the applicant not having been offered an alternative. He understands that it is a matter of cost. On the other hand, it is a matter of choice. He respects the desire of the applicant and their effort in designing the site. However, he sees that several of the items identified in staff's report indicates that this variance should be denied. VC/Lee moved, C/Nelson seconded, to adopt staff's recommendation that the Planning Commission deny Variance No. PL 2010-422, based on the Findings of Fact. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Nelson, Torng, VC/Lee, Chair/Shah NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Lin CDD/Gubman stated that all Planning Commission decisions may be appealed to the City Council. An appeal of the Planning Commission decision must be filed with the City Clerk within 10 calendar days of the Planning Commission's decision. Should anyone wish to file an appeal they are instructed to contact the City Clerk for information about filing an appeal and/or obtaining an appeal petition. PLANNING COMMISSIONER COMMENTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: VC/Lee thanked his colleagues for supporting him as the Vice Chairman and offered his support to Chair/Shah, the Commission and residents. C/Torng congratulated Chair/Shah and VC/Lee on their appointments and wished them the best. He thanked staff for their good job this evening. Chair/Shah thanked his colleagues for the opportunity to serve the City as the Planning Commission Chairman. He thanked staff for their support during his tenure with City Commissions. STAFF COMMENTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 10.1 Public Hearing dates for future projects. CDD/Gubman congratulated Chair/Shah and VC/Lee on their appointments to their current positions on the Planning Commission. He said to call or email if there are any questions about future agenda items. He has enjoyed MARCH 22, 2011 PAGE 13 PLANNING COMMISSION working with all of the Commissioners and looks forward to working with the new Chair and Vice Chair for the coming year. CDD/Gubman stated that the Planners Institute was held in Pasadena last week. He attended two of the three days and felt the overall program was less interesting and included more retreads of previous sessions. There was a good session on medical marijuana by a colleague of CA/Jenkins who jointly wrote an article with him on the matter. It was interesting to hear other cities' challenges in dealing with this kind of business growth throughout the state. The budget issues that took a lot of previous year's session time has been somewhat supplanted by the current controversy about eliminating redevelopment agencies. As far as new planning concepts and trends, there was not really a whole lot of interesting new stories for folks to tell which is probably a symptom of the economic downturn where there just has not been enough development activity to see new interesting things occur in the last few years. With that said, he wanted to reassure the Commissioners that they did not miss a whole lot. CDD/Gubman stated that the next Planning Commission is scheduled for April 12 and the Commissioners will hear requests for a cell site on a wireless telecomunitations facility — a streetlight on Diamond Bar Boulevard as well as, a new single family residence on Wagon Train. 11. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: As listed in tonight's agenda. ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Planning Commission, Chairman Torng adjourned the regular meeting at 8:50 p.m. The foregoing minutes are hereby approved this 12th day of April, 2011. Attest: Respectfully Submitted, Greg Gubman Community Development Director Jack Shah, Chairman xi 1 •.I n . II l r —— L 5 r 5 - 5 ✓ l r' e :i �m PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT CITY OF DIAMOND BAR - 21825 COPLEY DRIVE - DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 - TEL. (909) 839-7030 - FAX (909) 861-3117 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 7.1 MEETING DATE: April 12, 2011 CASE/FILE NUMBER: Development Review No. 2007-25 and Tree Permit No. 2007-06 PROJECT LOCATION: 2706 Indian Creek Road PROPERTY OWNER: Basant Bhatia 581 S. Azusa Way La Puente, CA 91744 APPLICANT: Pete Volbeda 180 N. Benson Avenue, Unit D Upland, CA 91789 Summary The applicant is requesting a one year time extension for Development Review No. 2007-25 which consisted of an approval for the construction of a new single-family residence with an attached garage on a 1.18 gross acre lot. Tree Permit No. 2007-06 was an approval for the removal of one Black Walnut tree and replacement with three new 24 -inch box Black Walnut trees. The applicant is requesting a time extension due to prolonged review and approval of the project by The Country Estates Architectural Committee. Approval of the fuel modification plans were also delayed by the Los Angeles County Fire Department. The applicant is currently working with the Public Works/Engineering Department and Building and Safety Division to obtain grading permits and construction permits. The applicant has set up a tentative timetable for the project and plans to obtain a grading permit by the end of this month, and start construction in May. After evaluating the application, staff finds that the proposed one-year time extension application meets the requisite findings for approval. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the time extension for Development Review No. 2007-27 and Tree Permit No. 2007-06. BACKGROUND: On February 10, 2009, the Planning Commission approved Development Review No. 2007-25 and Tree Permit No. 2007-06 to construct a 9,513 square -foot, new single- family residence with a 1,802 square -foot attached garage on an existing 1.18 gross acre (51,401 gross square -foot) lot. The property is located in the Rural Residential (RR) zone with a consistent underlying General Plan land use designation. The original approval for the project included a two year time frame to obtain building or grading permits and begin construction. The staff report and resolution from the February 10, 2009, Planning Commission meeting is included in Attachment 2. ANALYSIS: Review Authority (Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.66.0501 An extension of time may be granted up to a maximum of one year when a request for an extension of time, with good cause, is submitted to the Community Development Department. The project has been delayed due to the prolonged review and approval of the project from The Country Estates Architectural Committee. Approval of the fuel modification plans were also delayed by the Los Angeles County Fire Department. The applicant has been working with the Building and Safety Division and Public Works/Engineering Department to start grading- and building retaining walls. The applicant has not yet obtained a grading permit, which is required prior to building permit issuance. Therefore, the applicant has been unable to start construction prior to the expiration date of the Planning Commission approval, and as a result submitted a request for an extension of time to the City on January 10, 2011. The extension of time request does not change the approved project in any way. The conditions of approval set forth in the Planning Commission Resolution No. 2009-03 will not change with the approval of an extension of time. Project Status The applicant is currently working with the Public Works/Engineering Department and Building and Safety Division to obtain grading permits and construction permits for the retaining walls. The applicant has set up a tentative time table for the project and plans to obtain a grading permit by this month and start construction in May. Because the applicant has been working with the Public Works/Engineering Department to finalize the grading plan, staff supports the applicant's request for a one year extension of time. Development Review No. 2007-25 and Tree Permit No. 2007-6 Page 2 of 3 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: On April 1, 2011, public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 500 - foot radius of the project site, and on April 1, 2011, the notice was published in the Inland Valley Daily Tribune and San Gabriel Valley Tribune newspapers. The project site was posted with a notice display board, and a copy of the public notice was posted at the City's three designated community posting sites. Public Comments Received At the time the staff report was published, staff had not received any comments from the public. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: This project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on that assessment, the City has determined the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to the provisions of Article 19 under Section 15303(a) (New Construction of One Single -Family Residence) of the CEQA Guidelines. No further environmental review is required to extend the time limit for the approved project. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution (Attachment 1) approving a one year extension of time for Development Review No. 2007-25 and Tree Permit No. 2007-6, based on the findings of Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.66.050 of the Development Code, subject to conditions of approval as listed within the draft resolution. Prepared by: Natalie Tobon Planning Technician Attachments: Reviewed by: Grace S. Lee Senior Planner 1. Draft Resolution No. 2011 -XX 2. Planning Commission Staff Report Dated February 10, 2009 and Resolution 2009-03 3. Approved Plans Development Review No. 2007-25 and Tree Permit No. 2007-6 rage s or s r S" Attachment 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -XX A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 2007-25 AND TREE PERMIT NO. 2007-06 TO CONSTRUCT A NEW 9,513 SQUARE -FOOT, THREE-STORY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE ON A 51,401 GROSS SQUARE -FOOT LOT LOCATED AT 2706 INDIAN CREEK ROAD, DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 (APN 8713-036-018). A. RECITALS 1. On February 10, 2009, the Planning Commission approved Development Review No. 2007-25 and Tree Permit No. 2007-06 to construct a new three- story 9,513 sq. ft. single-family residence located at 2706 Indian Creek Road, Diamond Bar, Los Angeles County, California ("Project Site"). Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review shall be referred to as the "Proposed Project." This approval included an initial two-year expiration date for the applicant to commence construction. 2. The subject property is made up of one parcel totaling 1.18 gross acres. It is located in the Rural Residential (RR) zone with a consistent underlying General Plan land use designation. 3. The legal description of the subject property is Tract 23483, Lot 102. The Assessor's Parcel Number is 8713-036-018. 4. Section 22.66.050 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code authorizes the Planning Commission to grant time extension for approved projects, provided that certain findings can be made to establish good cause for such time extensions. 5. Applicant, Pete Volbeda, on behalf of Basant Bhatia, has filed a request for a one-year extension of time for the Project. 6. On April 1, 2011, notification of the public hearing for this project was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers. Public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 500 -foot radius of the Project site and public notices were posted at the City's designated community posting sites. In addition to the published and mailed notices, the project site was posted with a display board. 7. On April 12, 2011, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing, solicited testimony from all interested individuals, and concluded said hearing on that date. B. RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: 1. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. On April 1, 2011, the Planning Commission determined the Project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to the provisions of Article 19 under Section 15303(a) (New Construction of One Single -Family Residence) of the CEQA Guidelines. No further environmental review is required to extend the time limit for the approved project. 3. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein, this Planning Commission hereby finds as follows: Extension of Time Findings Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein and as prescribed under Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Section 22.66.050, this Planning Commission hereby finds as follows: 1. There have been no changes to the provision of the General Plan, any applicable specific plan, the Subdivision Ordinance, or the Development Code applicable to the project since the approval of the Development Review; There have been no changes to the provision of the General Plan, any applicable specific plan, the Subdivision Ordinance, or the Development Code. The construction of a new single-family residence is consistent with the zoning designation and will not be altered in any way by approving the requested extension of time and all conditions of approval adopted by Planning Commission Resolution No. 2009-03 will remain in full force and effect. 2. There have been no changes to the character of the site or its surroundings that affect how the policies of the General Plan or other standards of the Subdivision Ordinance or the Development Code apply to the project; and Since the Planning Commission approved the project, there have been no changes to the character of the site or its surroundings that affect how the policies of the General Plan or other standards of the Subdivision Ordinance or the Development Code apply to the project. 3. There have been no changes to the capacities of community resources, including but not limited to water supply, sewage treatment or disposal facilities, roads or schools so that there is no longer sufficient remaining capacity to serve the project. Since the Planning Commission approved the project, there have been no changes to the capacities of community resources, including but not limited to water supply, sewage treatment or disposal facilities, roads or schools so that there is no longer sufficient remaining capacity to serve the project. 2 Based on the findings and conclusions set forth above and as prescribed under Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Section 22.66.050, this Planning Commission hereby approved the Application subject to the following conditions: 1. The project shall substantially conform to the approved plans as submitted and approved by the Planning Commission and on file with the Community Development Department. 2. All conditions of approval for Development Review No. 2007-25 and Tree Permit No. 2007-06 approved by Planning Commission Resolution No. 2009-03 shall remain in full force and effect except as amended herein. 3. This approval shall extend the expiration date of Development Review No. 2007-25 and Tree Permit No. 2007-06 to February 10, 2012. The Planning Commission shall: a. Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and b. Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail to the applicant, Pete Volbeda, 180 N. Benson Ave, Unit D, Upland, CA 91789, and the property owner, Basant Bhatia, 581 S. Azusa Way, La Puente, CA 91744. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12th DAY OF APRIL 2011, BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. Jack Shah, Chairman I, Greg Gubman, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of April, 2011, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: ABSTAIN: Commissioners: ATTEST: Greg Gubman, Secretary 41 Attachment 2 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT 21825 COPLEY DRIVE -DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 -TEL (909) 839 -7030 -FAX (909) 861-3117-www.Cityofdiamondbu.com AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: MEETING DATE: CASE/FILE NUMBER: PROJECT LOCATION: 7.1 February 10, 2009 Development Review No. 2007-25 2706 Indian Creek Road Diamond Bar, CA 91765 APPLICATION REQUEST: Approval to construct a three-story, 9,513 square -foot single family residence with an attached 1,802 square foot garage on an existing 1.18 acre Rural Residential (RR) zoned parcel with a consistent underlying General Plan Land Use designation of Rural Residential (RR). PROPERTY OWNERS: Basant Bhatia 17753 Via San Jose Rowland Heights, CA 91748-4168 APPLICANTS: Pete Volbeda 180 N. Benson Avenue Suite D Upland, CA 91786 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval with Conditions BACKGROUND: A. Site Description: The site is located in the Diamond Bar "Country Estates" and fronts on Indian Creek Road, which is a fully improved private street. The property is located near the end of the street and is a rectangular shaped vacant lot containing 1.18 gross acres (51,401 sq. ft.) of land area. The site is legally described as Lot 102 of Tract No. 23483, and the Assessor Parcel Number is 8713-036-018. B. Project Description: The applicant requests approval to construct a three-story, 9,513 square -foot single family residence with an attached 1,802 square -foot garage on an existing 1.18 acre parcel. The proposed dwelling unit contains six bedrooms and seven bathrooms. The applicant indicated that upon approval of the proposed project, the plans will then be submitted to the Diamond Bar Country Estates Homeowners Association for review and consideration. The applicant submitted an arborist report that indicates the existence of one multi - trunk Black Walnut Tree described in the report as "EXTREE 3". The arborist evaluated and deemed it to be in "fair" to "good" health. The tree is 20 to 25 feet in height and has a canopy spread of 15 to 20 feet, with four to six trunks that range in diameter from four to six inches. The tree is located within the building pad area and is proposed to be removed. Diamond Bar Development Code Section 22.38.130 requires that the removed protected trees shall be replaced at a ratio of 3:1 and that the replacement trees shall be 24 -inch box. The removal of the Black Walnut tree on site will require replacement with three (3) new Black Walnuts, with a minimum box size of 24 inches.. See the Analysis section of this staff report for further discussion of the proposed landscape plan. ANALYSIS: A. Review Authority (Diamond Bar Municipal Code Chapter 22.48) - New construction on a vacant lot requires Planning Commission approval of a Development Review application. B. Site and Surroundinq General Plan, Zoning and Uses Page 2 DR 2007-25 General Plan Designation Zoning District Land Use Site Rural Residential RR Vacant Land North Rural Residential RR Vacant Land South Rural Residential RR Single Family Residential East Rural Residential RR Single Family Residential West Rural Residential RR Sin le Family Residential Page 2 DR 2007-25 C. Development Review 1. Residential District General Development Standards: The following Table compares the proposed project with the City's Development Standards for Residential Development in the RR Zone. Development Residential Development Proposed Meets Feature Standards Requirements Front setback 30 feet 30 Feet Yes Side Setbacks 15 feet on one side & 15'-0" — south side Yes 10 on the other side. 11'-0" — north side Side yard minimum 25 feet 40'-0" — south side Yes between adjoining Vacant Lot to north structures Rear setback 25 feet 25 feet Yes Lot Coverage Maximum of 30% 12% Yes Building height limit 35 feet 35 feet Yes Retaining Wall Maximum Height 6 feet 6 feet Yes Height Landscaping 50% of front yard 63% Yes Driveway Width Maximum 14 feet @ PL 14 feet @ PL Yes Parking Parkin 2 in fully enclosed garage One 2 -car garage and Yes Chapter 22.30 one 3 -car garage for a total of 5 spaces 2. Site and Grading: The site steeply slopes in an easterly direction. The proposed building pad is located at the top of the slope with a view of the surrounding area. The average slope of the site is 29%. The applicant indicates that the proposed project will require 2200 cubic yards of cut, and 900 cubic yards of fill, resulting in 1300 cubic yards of material to be exported from the site. 3. Elevations: The architectural style is a Mediterranean design with concrete tile roof treatment, smooth stucco walls, stone veneer, and multi -paned windows. The applicant has provided color samples which call for earth - toned shades for the exterior finish to soften the buildings visual impact and assist in preserving the hillside's aesthetic value. 4. Landscaping: The subject property is located within the Los Angeles County Fire Department "Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone." Therefore, the proposed landscaping must comply with the Fire Department's Fuel Modification Plan requirements. The submitted preliminary landscape plan Page 3 DR 2007-25 indicates that the future landscaping will comply with the Fire Department's regulations and guidelines. The preliminary landscape plan indicates that 10 new trees will be planted on site. The size of the new trees will be 24 -inch box. In addition to the proposed trees, the applicant has proposed three (3) new 24 -inch box Black Walnut trees to replace the one proposed for removal. The applicant indicates that over 63% of the required front yard area will be landscaped with plant material. The tiered retaining walls and slopes at the rear of the property will be fully landscaped to screen the walls. Plant types proposed in these areas and throughout the front yard area are drought tolerant non-invasive plant species such as Star Jasmine, Day Lily, and Mock Orange. A condition of approval has been added requiring the avoidance of invasive species as identified by the California Plant Council. D. Compliance with Hillside Management Ordinance The proposed project has been reviewed for compliance with the City's Hillside Management Design Guidelines and regulations. Section 22.22.120(a)(1) of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code establishes a height limit of 35 feet as measured from the finished grade to the highest ridge beam. The submitted grading plans include several cross sections to demonstrate that the proposed structure will comply with the City's maximum building height requirements. E. General Plan, Design Guidelines and Compatibility with Neighborhood The proposed project complies with the goals and objectives as set forth in the adopted General Plan in terms of land use and density. The proposed project will not negatively affect the existing surrounding land uses, and the design and appearance of the proposed additions are compatible with the existing residence and surrounding community. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: Public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 500 -foot radius of the project site, and the notice was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers. A notice display board was posted at the site, and a copy of the legal notice was posted at the City's designated community posting sites. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: This project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on that assessment, the City has determined the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA in accordance with the provisions of Article 19 Section 15303(a) (New Construction of one single-family residence) of the CEQA Guidelines. No further environmental review is required. Page 4 DR 2007-25 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution approving Development Review No. 2007-25 based on the findings set forth under Section 22.48.040 of the Development Code, subject to conditions. Prepared by: Attachments: Reviewed by Greg Gubman, AICP Acting Community Development Director 1. Draft Resolution of Approval 2. Aerial Photo 3. Exhibit "A" — site plan, floor plan, roof plan, elevations Page 5 DR 2007-25 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2009-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 2007-25 FOR THE REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A THREE-STORY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE ON LOT NO. 102 OF TRACT 23483 LOCATED AT 2706 INDIAN CREEK ROAD, DIAMOND BAR, CA (APN 8713-036-018) A. RECITALS 1. The Planning Commission considered an application filed by Pete Volbeda, on behalf of the property owner, Basant Bhatia, requesting approval of plans to construct a new three-story, 9,513 square -foot single- family residence with an attached four -car, 1,802 square -foot garage. The location of the proposed project is 2706 Indian Creek Road. 2. The subject property is zoned Rural Residential (RR) and it contains 51,401 square feet (1.18 acres) of gross land area. The property in question is subject to the Rural Residential (RR) Development Code Standards. 3. The subject property is legally described as Lot 102 of Tract No. 23483, and the Assessor's Parcel Number is (APN) 8713-036-018. 4. Public Hearing notification was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers and property owners within a 500 -foot radius of the project site were notified of the proposed project by mail. Further, a public hearing notice display board was posted at the site, and the notice was posted at three other locations within the project vicinity. 5. On February 10, 2009, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing, solicited testimony from all interested individuals, and concluded said hearing on that date. B. RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: 1. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. The Planning Commission has determined the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA in accordance with the provisions of Article 19 Section 15303(a) (New Construction of one single-family residence) of the CEQA Guidelines. No further environmental review is required. 3. Based upon the information contained in the submitted plans, the associated staff report and testimony given at the public hearing the Planning Commission hereby finds as follows: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW a. The design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, development standards of the applicable zone district, design guidelines, and architectural criteria for specialized areas, (e.g., specific plans, community plans, boulevards, or planned developments.) The proposed single-family residence is consistent with the RR Zone's Development Standards and the City's Design Guidelines. In addition, the proposed project with conditions of approval is consistent, in terms of mass, scale and appearance, with the surrounding single-family dwelling units. b. The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future development, and it will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. The subject property is located within a designed and developed residential estate neighborhood. The existing public and private improvements are available to support the proposed development and the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed single-family residence will not negatively impact the existing or future development of the surrounding neighborhood. C. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the characteristics of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22.48 Diamond Bar Development Code, the General Plan, City Design Guidelines, or any applicable specific plan. The design of the proposed single-family residence is consistent with the goals and objectives of the long-range planning policy documents adopted by the City of Diamond Bar. The proposed project is compatible with the scope, scale and appearance of the surrounding existing development. The proposed project is an infill 2 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2009-03 development that will complement the neighborhood residential character. d. The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public, as well as its neighbors, through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, and color that will remain aesthetically appealing. The project's design and use of construction material are consistent with other single-family residences in the surrounding neighborhood. e. The proposed project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious (e.g., negative affect on property values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed single-family residence is consistent with the anticipated development pattern for the neighborhood and it will not negatively impact the public health, safety or general welfare. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusion set forth above, the Planning Commission hereby approves this Application subject to the following conditions: a. Planning Division (1) Development shall substantially comply with the plans and documents presented to the Planning Commission at the public hearing. (2) The project landscape plan shall avoid the use of invasive plant materials as identified by the California Invasive Plant Council. A complete list of the plant material to be avoided can be found at the following web address: www.calipc.org. (3) The applicant shall obtain the services of a licensed landscape architect to prepare the final landscape plans for the proposed project. The landscape plans shall include the design and selection of material for all hardscape, walls and fencing. The detailed landscape plans shall be submitted to the Community Development Director for review and approval, prior to issuance of building permits. (4) The required landscape plan shall be designed to meet the requirements of the Los Angeles County Fire Department's Fuel Modification Plan Guidelines in terms of plant selection, 3 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2009-03 placement and maintenance. The final landscape plan shall be submitted to the Fire Department for review and approval. (5) The landscape plan shall include the in-kind replacement of all protected trees that are removed from the site in order to accommodate the proposed development. The ratio of the replacement trees shall be 3:1. The minimum size of the replacement trees shall be 24 -inch box. The plan shall delineate the location of all trees that will be removed and the location of all new plant material to include the location of the replacement trees. (6) A certified arborist shall be retained to supervise the installation of the protected tree replacement to insure the survivability of the replacement trees. A report shall be provided to the Director of Community Development for review and approval. (7) A maintenance agreement shall be provided to the City indicating the property owner's responsibility to insure that the replacement trees will be properly maintained for a period of not less than five (5) years. A security deposit as determined by the Director shall be posted with the City. (8) Prior to submittal of plans for Building Division plan check all retaining walls associated with the lot pad shall be revised so that the exposed height does not exceed four feet. (9) The maximum exposed face of any freestanding retaining wall not associated with the lot pad shall be limited to six feet in height. The retaining walls shall be constructed of decorative masonry material approved by the Director. All retaining walls shall be screened with approved landscape material. b. Standard Conditions. The applicant shall comply with the standard development conditions attached hereto. The Planning Commission shall: a. Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and b. Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail to the applicant, Pete Volbeda, 180 N. Benson Ave., Suite D, Upland, CA 91786 and the property owner Mr. Basant Bhatia, 17753 Via San Jose, Rowland Heights, CA 91748. 4 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2009-03 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF February 2009, BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. M Steve Nelson, Chairman I, Greg Gubman, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of February, 2009, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN ATTEST: Commissioners: Commissioners Commissioners: Commissioners: Greg Gubman, Secretary Lee, Nolan, VC/Torng, Chair/Nelson None Shah None 5 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2009-03 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS USE PERMITS, COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL NEW AND REMODELED STRUCTURES PROJECT #: DR 2007-25 SUBJECT: New Single Family Residence PROPERTY Basant Bhatia OWNER: 17753 Via San Jose Rowland Heights, CA 91748 APPLICANT: Pete Volbeda 180 N. Benson Ave Ste. D Upland, CA 91786 LOCATION: 2706 Indian Creek Drive Diamond Bar, CA ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION AT (909) 839-7030, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. In accordance with Government Code Section 66474.9(b)(1), the applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, and its officers, agents and employees, from any claim, action, or proceeding to attack, set-aside, void or annul, the approval of Development Review No. 2007-25 brought within the time period provided by Government Code Section 66499.37. In the event the city and/or its officers, agents and employees are made a party of any such action: (a) Applicant shall provide a defense to the City defendants or at the City's option reimburse the City its costs of defense, including reasonable attorneys fees, incurred in defense of such claims. 6 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2009- (b) Applicant shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against the City descendents. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action of proceeding, and shall cooperate fully in the defense thereof. 2. This approval shall not be effective for any purpose until the applicant and owner of the property involved have filed, within twenty-one (21) days of approval of this Development Review No. 2007-25, at the City of Diamond Bar Community Development Department, their affidavit stating that they are aware of and agree to accept all the conditions of this approval. Further, this approval shall not be effective until the applicants pay remaining City processing fees, school fees and fees for the review of submitted reports. 3. All designers, architects, engineers, and contractors associated with this project shall obtain a Diamond Bar Business License; and a zoning approval for those businesses located in Diamond Bar. 4. Signed copies of Planning Commission Resolution No. 2009-03, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 5. Prior to the plan check, revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval. 6. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval shall be completed. 7. The project site shall be maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of approval and all laws, or other applicable regulations. 8. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and any applicable Specific Plan in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 9. Site, grading, landscape/irrigation and roof plans, elevations and sections shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of City permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.,) or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 10. The single family residence shall not be used in a manner that creates adverse effects upon the neighborhood and environmental setting of the residential site to levels of dust, glare/light, noise, odor, traffic, or other disturbances to the existing residential neighborhood and shall not result in significantly adverse effects on public services and resources. The single family residence shall not be used for 7 Planning commission Resolution No. 2009- commercial/institutional purposes, or otherwise used as a separate dwelling. The property shall not be used for regular gatherings which result in a nuisance or which create traffic and parking problems in the neighborhood. 11. Property owner/applicant shall remove the public hearing notice board within three days of this project's approval. 12. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of City Planning, Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works Department, and the Fire Department. B. FEES/DEPOSITS 1. Applicant shall pay development fees (including but not limited to Planning, Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works Department and Mitigation Monitoring) at the established rates, prior to issuance of building or grading permit (whichever comes first), as required by the City. School fees as required shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permit. In addition, the applicant shall pay all remaining prorated City project review and processing fees prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever come first. 2. Prior to any plan check, all deposit accounts for the processing of this project shall have no deficits. C. TIME LIMITS 1. The approval of Development Review No. 2007-25 shall expire within two years from the date of approval if the use has not been exercised as defined per Municipal Code Section 22.66.050 (b)(1). The applicant may request in writing a one year time extension subject to Municipal Code Section 22.60.050(c) for Planning Commission approval. D. SITE DEVELOPMENT 1. The project site shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the approved plans submitted to, approved, and amended herein by the Planning Commission, collectively attached hereto as Exhibit "A" including: site plans, floor plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to the issuance of any permits, the Applicant shall complete and record a "Covenant and Agreement to Maintain a Single -Family Residence" on a form to be provided by the City. The covenant shall be completed and recorded with the Los Angeles County Recorders Office. 8 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2009- 3. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, air conditioning condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berms, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Division. E. LANDSCAPE, PRESERVED AND PROTECTED TREES 1. Prior to issuance of any permits, detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval. 2. Prior to issuance of any permits, the method of tree replacement shall be determined. Trees that will be replaced on site shall be plotted on the final landscape plan for the City's review and approval. 3. Prior to plan check submittal, a final landscape/irrigation plan shall be submitted with the type of planting materials, color, size, quantity and location including proposed sites for the planting of protected/preserved trees and additional species to mask the retaining wall height. 4. Prior to the Planning Division's final inspection and/or Certificate of Occupancy issuance, the landscaping/irrigation shall be installed or replaced. Any dense plant material proposed in the front setback shall not exceed a 42 inches maximum height. 5. Prior to the Planning Division's final inspection, a total of three Black Walnut trees shall be planted on site for the replacement of the one Black Walnut tree of good health being removed. 6. Prior to the issuance of City permits, the applicant shall submit revegetation landscape and irrigation plans for slopes within the project site for Planning Division review and approval. Said slope shall be landscaped at the completion of grading activities. All slope planting, irrigation and revegetation areas shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition. 7. Prior to releasing occupancy, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that the slope vegetation is in satisfactory condition. 8. Retaining walls shall not exceed an exposed height of six (6) feet as delineated in Exhibit "A". All retaining walls shall be earth tone in color and constructed from decorative material (i.e., split face, stacked stone, etc.) Retaining walls or fences located within the front yard setback shall not exceed an exposed height of 42 inches. 9 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2009- F. SOLID WASTE 1. The site shall be maintained in a condition, which is free of debris both during and after the construction, addition, or implementation of the entitlement approved herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether during or subsequent to construction shall be done only by the property owner, applicant or by a duly permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste from residential, commercial, construction, and industrial areas within the City. It shall be the applicant's obligation to insure that the waste contractor used has obtained permits from the City of Diamond Bar to provide such services. 2. Mandatory solid waste disposal services shall be provided by the City franchised waste hauler to all parcels/lots or uses affected by approval of this project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, (909) 839-7040, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. GENERAL 1. An Erosion Control Plan shall be submitted concurrently with the grading plan clearly detailing erosion control measures. These measures shall be implemented during construction. The erosion control plan shall conform to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards and incorporate the appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP's) as specified in the Storm Water BMP Certification. For construction activity which disturbs one acre or greater soil a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be needed. Please refer to City handouts. 2. The applicant shall comply with Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) requirements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Please refer to City handouts. 3. Grading and construction activities and the transportation of equipment and materials and operation of heavy grading equipment shall be limited to between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. Dust generated by grading and construction activities shall be reduced by watering the soil prior to and during the activities and in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 402 and Rule 403. Reclaimed water shall be used whenever possible. In addition, all construction equipment shall be properly muffled to reduce noise levels. 10 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2009- B. SOILS REPORT/GRADING/RETAINING WALLS 1. Prior to grading plan submittal, a geotechnical report prepared by a Geotechnical Engineer, licensed by the State of California, shall be submitted by the applicant for approval by the City. 2. Upon approval of the geotechnical report, the applicant shall submit drainage and grading plans prepared by a Civil Engineer, licensed by the State of California, prepared in accordance with the City's requirements for the City's review and approval. A list of requirements for grading plan check is available from the Public Works Department. All grading (cut and fill) calculations shall be submitted to the City concurrently with the grading plan. 3. Finished slopes shall conform to City Code Section 22.22.080 -Grading. 4. All easements and flood hazard areas shall be clearly identified on the grading plan. 5. The grading plan shall show the location of any retaining walls and the elevations of the top of wall/footing/retaining and the finished grade on both sides of the retaining wall. Construction details for retaining walls shall be shown on the grading plan. Calculations and details of retaining walls shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for review and approval. 6. All equipment staging areas shall be located on the project site. Staging area, including material stockpile and equipment storage area, shall be enclosed within a six foot -high chain link fence. All access points in the defense shall be locked whenever the construction site is not supervised. 7. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the California Building Code, City Grading Ordinance, Hillside Management Ordinance and acceptable grading practices. 8. The maximum grade of driveways serving building pad areas shall be 15 percent. In hillside areas driveway grades exceeding 15 percent shall have parking landings with a minimum 16 feet deep and shall not exceed five (5) percent grade or as required by the City Engineer. Driveways with a slope of 15 percent shall incorporate grooves for traction into the construction as required by the City Engineer. 9. All slopes shall be seeded per landscape plan and/or fuel modification plan with native grasses or planted with ground cover, shrubs, and trees for erosion control upon completion of grading or some other alternative method of erosion control shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and a permanent irrigation system shall be installed. 11 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2009- 10. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a pre -construction meeting shall be held at the project site with the grading contractor, applicant, and city grading inspector at least 48 hours prior to commencing grading operations. 11. Rough grade certifications by project soils and civil engineer shall be submitted prior to issuance of building permits for the foundation of the residential structure. Retaining wall permits may be issued without a rough grade certificate. 12. As -graded geotechnical report shall be submitted for review and approval prior to any issuance of building permits. Retaining wall permits may be issued with the grading permit. 13. Final grade certifications by project soils and civil engineers shall be submitted to the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of any project final inspections/certificate of occupancy respectively. C. DRAINAGE 1. Detailed drainage system information of the lot with careful attention to any flood hazard area shall be submitted. All drainage/runoff from the development shall be conveyed from the site to the natural drainage course. No on-site drainage shall be conveyed to adjacent parcels, unless that is the natural drainage course. 2. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a complete hydrology and hydraulic study shall be prepared by a Civil Engineer registered in the State of California to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Los Angeles Public Works Department. D. UTILITIES 1. Applicant shall relocate and underground any existing on-site utilities to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the respective utility owner. 2. Underground utilities shall not be constructed within the drip line of any mature tree except as approved by a registered arborist. E. SEWERS/SEPTIC TANK 1. Any homeowner that installs a new septic tank system, repairs and existing septic tank or adds any plumbing fixture units or bedroom equivalents to the facility served by an existing septic system will need to submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to the Regional Water Quality Control Board for Waste Discharge Requirements and submit a copy of the sent NO[ and check to the City. Please refer to City handouts. 2. SEPTIC TANK: The Applicant shall show septic tanks location, size and details on the plans. The Los Angeles County Health Department, California Water 12 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2009- Control Board and the City's Geotechnical Engineer shall approve these plans prior to the issuance of any permits. The property owner shall be required to sign and record the City's Covenant for use of a septic system. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 839-7020, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Plans shall conform to State and Local Building Code (i.e., 2007 California Building Code, California Plumbing Code, California Mechanical Code, and California Electrical Code) requirements and all other applicable construction codes, ordinances and regulations in effect at the time of plan check submittal. 2. Application for which no permit is issued within 180 days following the date of application shall expire by limitation, and plans and other data submitted for review. may thereafter be returned to the applicant or destroyed by the Building Department. 3. Every permit issued by the Building Department shall expire if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit. 4. The minimum design load for wind in this area is 85 M.P.H. exposures "C" and the site is within seismic category (D). The applicant shall submit drawings and calculations prepared by a California State licensed Architect/Engineer with wet stamp and signature. 5. The applicant shall submit a foundation and soils investigation report. 6. This project shall comply with the energy conservation requirements of the State of California Energy Commission. Kitchen and bathroom lights shall be fluorescent or controlled by a manual-on/auto off, occupant sensor. 7. Construction activities causing the operation of any tools or equipment used in construction, drilling, repair, alteration, or demolition work shall be conducted Mon. -Sat. between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. 8. A height survey may be required at completion of framing. 9. Indicate the proposed building on the plans. Submit code analysis and justification showing the following: a. Each building square foot b. Each building height C. Type of construction d. Each group occupancy e. Property line location in relation to each building (side yard) 13 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2009- Prior to Building permit issuance, Walnut Valley School District fees must be paid. Please obtain a form from the Building and Safety Division to take directly to the school district. Walnut Valley School District 880 S Lemon Ave Walnut, CA 91789 (909)595-1261 10. Please submit a total of 5 full set of plans including the grading for review to the Building and Safety Division after the plans have been approved by the Planning Division/Com mission. 11. Indicate all easements on the site plan. 12. Foundation systems on expansive soil shall be constructed in a manner that minimizes damage to the structure from movement of the soil. Depth of foundation below the natural and finish grade shall be not less than 24 inches for exterior and 18 inches for interior foundations. 13. All retaining walls shall be submitted to the Building and Safety and Public Work Departments for review and approval. 14. Submit grading plans showing clearly all finish elevations, drainage, and retaining wall locations. No building permits shall be issued prior to submitting a pad certification. 15. The project shall be protected by a construction fence and shall comply with the NPDES & BMP requirements (sand bags, etc.) 16. Check drainage patterns with Engineering Department. Surface water shall drain away from building at a 2% minimum slope. 17. Private property sewer/septic system shall be approved by the Los Angeles County Health Department and the California Water Control Board. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE PREVENTION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Fire Department approval is required. Contact the Fire Department to check the fire zone for the location of your property. If this project is located in Very High Severity Fire Zone it shall meet of requirements of the fire zone. 14 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2009- a. All unenclosed under -floor areas shall be constructed as exterior wall. b. All openings into the attic, floor and/or other enclosed areas shall be covered with corrosion -resistant wire mesh not less than 1/4 inch or more than 1/2 inch in any dimension except where such openings are equipped with sash or door. 2. Emergency access shall be provided, maintaining free and clear, a minimum 28 foot at all times during construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. 3. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be submitted to the Fire Department that temporary water supply for fire protection is available pending completion of the required fire protection system. 4. All required fire hydrants shall be installed and tested and accepted prior to construction. Vehicular access must be provided and maintained serviceable throughout construction for fire protection and available pending completion of the required fire protection system. 5. All required fire hydrants shall be installed and tested and accepted prior to construction. Vehicular access must be provided and maintained serviceable throughout construction. End 15 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2009- 66 1\0 j/ / e2\2® ! A;zl 2 j _ \ /�/�/ III SITE PLAN m§GEk K�±0 N .m�_:r_ a 91786_ 0� 2706 INDIAN CREEK. _w» 909 373 1150 FAX 909 373 152 \ \ ! 2 -7 0 > oa �([!R7 ; _ /e \ ( \\/\ ^ �- /} Q° 66 1\0 j/ / e2\2® ! A;zl 2 j _ \ /�/�/ III SITE PLAN m§GEk K�±0 N .m�_:r_ a 91786_ 0� 2706 INDIAN CREEK. _w» 909 373 1150 FAX 909 373 152 \ \ �•. r X111 iii I1' !I::1'i il# I'�'!� �' � � � Fv �i 1'jil 1� 1''111!Irll!I• ' gg m� it j 1 �.� {I I�!.itllii'• nggA m$ � �J au. �"'it �1i 1 ' e9 7g ���� ii®�®Eup 11P6'i�ouLwo Nfln ig 'b0 N BENSON AVE, SUTE D UPLAND CA 91786 MR BHA11A DRN 2007-25 CUP -14 2706 INDIAN CREEK. DIAMOND BAR CA 91765—Tr-rl TEL 909 3731150 FAX 909 373 1152 v x 0 g v m C) D m o o 9 m 0-0 -. u ry 3 7 -O m m O'O C > > O p 0 m 3 3 0 3 g O (D y y mm�mwewm NNN�m zx� Z o y n (n � 16 2 p Km Q 3 ' _0 5 ,. C) i 'Q r➢ri O c 0 o o N � n z p i —m r m m � s r y y mm�mwewm NNN�m zx� Z N mm N419�yyA „_x mPioi;O��=o�� Km T. 88Aya.9y�ng�z Sim � O D k £p n >g N ,. i 'Q r➢ri � Na`z€£=zessN o o z p i PETE VOLHEnp 4vh Loowrc PhFnpg SITE PLAN BHATIA 7706 INDIAN CRFFK. DRN 2007-25 CA 91] 917655 6 OIAIdONO RAR 180 N BENSON AVE, TEL 909 373 RSO SUITE D UPLAND CA 91786 FAX 909 373 152 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA April 12, 2011 7:00 P.M. FILE COPY 3 " S. :D -e• South Coast Air Quality Management District Government Center Building Auditorium 21865 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Chairman Vice Chairman Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Jack Shah Kwang Ho Lee Jimmy Lin Steve Nelson Tony Torng Copies of staff reports or other written documentation relating to agenda items are on file in the Planning Division of the Community Development Department, located at 21825 Copley Drive, and are available for public inspection. If you have questions regarding an agenda item, please call (909) 839-7030 during regular business hours. Written materials distributed to the Planning Commission within 72 hours of the Planning Commission meeting are available for public inspection immediately upon distribution in the City Clerk's office at 21825 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California, during normal business hours. In an effort to comply with the requirements of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the City of Diamond Bar requires that any person in need of any type of special equipment, assistance or accommodation(s) in order to communicate at a City public meeting must inform the Community Development Department at (909) 839-7030 a minimum of 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting. Please refrain from smoking, eating or The City of Diamond Bar uses recycled paper drinking in the Auditorium and encourages you to do the same City of Diamond Bar Planning Commission MEETING RULES PUBLIC INPUT The meetings of the Diamond Bar Planning Commission are open to the public. A member of the public may address the Commission on the subject of one or more agenda items and/or other items of which are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Diamond Bar Planning Commission. A request to address the Commission should be submitted in writing at the public hearing, to the Secretary of the Commission. As a general rule, the opportunity for public comments will take place at the discretion of the Chair. However, in order to facilitate the meeting, persons who are interested parties for an item may be requested to give their presentation at the time the item is called on the calendar. The Chair may limit individual public input to five minutes on any item; or the Chair may limit the total amount of time allocated for public testimony based on the number of people requesting to speak and the business of the Commission. Individuals are requested to conduct themselves in a professional and businesslike manner. Comments and questions are welcome so that all points of view are considered prior to the Commission making recommendations to the staff and City Council. In accordance with State Law (Brown Act), all matters to be acted on by the Commission must be posted at least 72 hours prior to the Commission meeting. In case of emergency or when a subject matter arises subsequent to the posting of the agenda, upon making certain findings, the Commission may act on item that is not on the posted agenda. INFORMATION RELATING TO AGENDAS AND ACTIONS OF THE COMMISSION Agendas for Diamond Bar Planning Commission meetings are prepared by the Planning Division of the Community Development Department. Agendas are available 72 hours prior to the meeting at City Hall and the public library, and may be accessed by personal computer at the number below. Every meeting of the Planning Commission is recorded on cassette tapes and duplicate tapes are available for a nominal charge. ADA REQUIREMENTS A cordless microphone is available for those persons with mobility impairments who cannot access the public speaking area. The service of the cordless microphone and sign language interpreter services are available by giving notice at least three business days in advance of the meeting. Please telephone (909) 839-7030 between 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m., Monday through Thursday, and 7:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Friday. HELPFUL PHONE NUMBERS Copies of Agenda, Rules of the Commission, General Agendas (909) 839-7030 email: info(c)ci diamond-bar.ca.us Cassette Tapes of Meetings (909) 839-7030 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, April 12, 2011 AGENDA CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 p.m. Next Resolution No. 2011-07 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: 1. ROLL CALL: COMMISSIONERS: Chairman Jack Shah, Vice Chairman Kwang Ho Lee, Jimmy Lin; Steve Nelson, Tony Torng 2. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is the time and place for the general public to. address the members of the Planning Commission on any item that is within their jurisdiction, allowing the public an opportunity to speak on non-public hearing and non -agenda items. Please complete a Speaker's Card for the recording Secretary (completion of this form is voluntary) There is a five-minute maximum time limit when addressing the Planning Commission. I * * * * * * * 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Chairman 4. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following items listed on the consent calendar are considered routine and are approved by a single motion. Consent calendar items may be removed from the agenda by request of the Commission only: 4.1 Minutes of Regular Meeting: March 22, 2011. 5. OLD BUSINESS: None. 6. NEW BUSINESS: None. 7. PUBLIC HEARING(S): 7.1 Development Review No 2007-25 and Tree Permit No. 2007-06 — Request for a one-year time extension of the Planning Commission's approval for a new 9,513 square -foot, three story single-family residential project on a 51,401 gross square foot (1.18 acre) lot. The project site is zoned Rural Residential (RR) with a consistent underlying General Plan land use designation. The project was approved on February 10, 2009, with a two year time frame to obtain building permits and begin construction; however Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.60.050 authorizes the Planning Commission to grant a one-year time extension. APRIL 12, 2011 PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA Project Address: 2706 Indian Creek Road Property Owner: Basant Bhatia 17753 Via San Jose Rowland Heights, CA 91748 Applicant: Pete Volbeda 180 N. Benson Ave., Suite D Upland, CA 91786 Environmental Determination: This project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on that assessment, the City has determined the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to the provisions of Article 19 under Section 15303(a) (New Construction of One Single -Family Residence) of the CEQA Guidelines. No further environmental review is required to extend the time limit for the approved project. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve a one-year time extension for Development Review No. 2007-25 and Tree Permit No. 2007-06, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the draft resolution. 7.2 Development Review PL 2010-289 — Under the authority of Diamond Bar Municipal Section 22.48, the applicant, Stuart Beck, and the property owner, Hai Nguyen, are requesting approval to demolish an existing residence and construct a new 7,432 square -foot single family residence on a 1.88 gross acre (82,015 square -foot) lot. The subject property is zoned Rural Residential (RR) with a consistent underlying General Plan land use designation. Project Address: 3010 Wagon Train Ln. Property Owner: Hai Nguyen 3057 Windmill Dr. Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Applicant: Stuart Beck 2915 Redhill Ave., Suite G102 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Environmental Determination: This project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on that assessment, the City has determined the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to the provisions of Article 19 under Sections 15301(1)(2) (Demolition of a Single Family Residence) and APRIL 12, 2011 PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA 15303(a) (Construction of a New Single Family Residence) of the CEQA Guidelines. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review No. PL 2010-289, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the draft resolution. 7.3 Conditional Use Permit No. PL 2010-355 — Under the authority of Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.58, the applicant is requesting approval to remove an existing Edison street light pole located on Diamond Bar Blvd., public rights-of-way, north of Tin Dr., and replace it with a similar light pole equipped with cellular telecommunications antennas and associated ground - mounted equipment. Project Address: Public rights-of-way on Diamond Bar Boulevard and 760 S. Diamond Bar Boulevard Property Owner: City of Diamond Bar 21825 Copley Dr. Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Applicant: Sequoia Deployment Services on Behalf of T -Mobile Monica Moretta One Venture, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92618 Environmental Determination: This project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on that assessment, the City has determined the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to the provisions of Article 19 Section 15303 (New Construction of Small Structures) of the CEQA Guidelines. No further environmental review is required. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit No. PL 2010-355, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the draft resolution. 8. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS / INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 9. STAFF COMMENTS / INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 9.1 Public Hearing dates for future projects: APRIL 12, 2011 PAGE 4 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA 10. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING: CITY BIRTHDAY PARTY: CITY COUNCIL MEETING: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING: 11. ADJOURNMENT: Thursday, April 14, 2011 - 7:00 p.m. Government Center/SCAQMD Hearing Board Room, 21865 Copley Drive Saturday, April 16, 2011 Pantera Park. 738 Pantera Drive Tuesday, April 19, 2011 - 6:30 p.m. Government Center/SCAQMD Auditorium 21865 Copley Drive Tuesday, April 26, 2011 — 7:00 p.m. Government Center/SCAQMD Auditorium 21865 Copley Drive Thursday, April 28, 2010-7:00 p.m. Government Center/SCAQMD Hearing Board Room, 21865 Copley Drive MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 22, 2011 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Torng called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in the South Coast Air Quality Management District/Government Center Auditorium, 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Commissioner Lee led the Pledge of Allegiance. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Kwang Ho Lee, Jimmy Lin, Steve Nelson, Vice Chairman Jack Shah, and Chairman Tony Torng. Also present: Greg Gubman, Community Development Director; Brad Wohlenberg, Assistant City Attorney; Grace Lee, Senior Planner; Natalie Tobon, Planning Technician; and Stella Marquez, Senior Administrative Assistant. Also Present: John Douglas, Housing Element Consultant 2. REORGANIZATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION: a) Selection of Chairman: C/Torng nominated Commissioner Shah to serve as Chairman of the Planning Commission. C/Lee seconded the nomination. There were no other nominations offered. Commissioner Shah was unanimously elected to serve as Chairman of the Planning Commission by the following Roll Call vote: C/Lee Yes C/Linn Yes C/Nelson Yes C/Shah Yes C/Torng Yes b) Selection of Vice Chairman: C/Torng nominated C/Lee to serve as Vice Chairman of the Planning Commission. C/Nelson seconded the nomination. There were no other nominations offered. Commissioner Lee was elected to serve as Vice Chairman of the Planning Commission by the following Roll Call vote: MARCH 22, 2011 PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION C/Lee abstain C/Linn Yes C/Nelson Yes C/Torng Yes Chair/Shah Yes 3. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: None 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: C/Torng moved, C/Nelson seconded, to move Agenda Item 8.2 prior to Agenda Item 8.1. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS NOES: COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS CONSENT CALENDAR: Lin, Nelson, Torng, VC/Lee, Chair/Shah None None 5.1 Minutes of the Regular Meeting of February 8, 2011. C/Nelson moved, VC/Lee seconded, to approve the February 8, 2011, minutes as presented. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: 6. OLD BUSINESS: 7 NEW BUSINESS COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: None None PUBLIC HEARINGS: Lin, Nelson, Torng, VC/Lee, Chair/Shah None None 8.2 General Plan Amendment No. PL 2011-4312008-2014 Housing Element Update) — Pursuant to state law, the proposed project is the update to the City's General Plan Housing Element for the 2008-2014 planning period. PROPERTY ADDRESS: PROPERTY OWNER: Citywide Citywide APPLICANT: City of Diamond Bar MARCH 22, 2011 PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION CDD/Gubman introduced John Douglas, JHD Consulting, who presented staffs report. Mr. Douglas stated that in January 2011, the City received a letter from the State of California indicating that if the City adopts the Housing Element in the form before the Planning Commission this evening, it will meet all of the requirements of state law and will be certified. He elaborated on the certification process and CDD/Gubman presented information regarding the proposed and potential rezone sites contained within the Housing Element. Mr. Douglas talked about special needs housing consisting of "Emergency Shelters," 'Transitional and Supportive Housing," and 'Reasonable Accommodation for Persons with Disabilities." On April 19 staff expects the City Council to review this item and following Council adoption of the Housing Element, staff will move into the implementation phase which will include the zone changes and code amendments. CDD/Gubman recommended that the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of General Plan Amendment No. PL 2011-43 (2008-2014 Housing Element update). C/Nelson asked for an explanation of "transitional and supportive housing" and Mr. Douglas responded that it refers to housing that is designated for persons that are at -risk" of homelessness. C/Nelson asked if it had anything to do with people with criminal records or substance abuse issues and Mr. Douglas said he believed those kinds of programs could have persons with these sorts of problems that are often considered a disability. C/Nelson said he recalled that there was some discussion about the number and distance apart of some of these facilities and asked if that was included in the Housing Element. CDD/Gubman explained that there was a Code Amendment done for Group Homes' last year which established distance criteria for sober living facilities and boarding facilities and similar types of uses the City would need to provide for minimally. Emergency shelters are not part of the criteria for group homes, substance abuse and parolee probationary housing which are different from the items being discussed within the Housing Element, and are, in addition, subject to discretionary review. The emergency shelters would be for persons who are destitute and what would be envisioned for these emergency shelters would be churches such as Calvary Chapel, for example. While not limited to churches, staff believes those institutions in Diamond Bar have facilities that would be the most logical locations to accommodate emergency housing needs. VC/Lee asked what kind of housing was contemplated for multi -family units. Mr. Douglas responded that the law does not specify whether it needs to be MARCH 22, 2011 PAGE 4 PLANNING COMMISSION apartments or condos but the law does say that cities cannot specify that it only be condos. The law has to allow multi -family rental housing. What is presented in the Housing Element is exclusively residential and does not include commercial. C/Lin asked if "target quota" meant the City did not have to comply and Mr. Douglas said he believed the best answer was that the state legislature understands that cities do not have total control over the development process. There are certain regulatory requirements that have to be in place in order for housing to be built, including affordable housing. State law holds cities responsible for the things over which they have control. Cities can adopt regulations but if there is not a developer that wishes to build under those regulations it will not happen except in situations such as a Redevelopment Agency wherein the City could act as a developer. C/Lin said he was curious about whether the demographics for 2007 were substantially different from the 2010 census data. Mr. Douglas said staff does not know yet because the 2010 census information that has been released is the most basic of information and there is a lot of other data that will come out over the next couple of years. When talking about the City's "fair -share" needs that drives this process, it is good to remember that those needs were established in 2007 by SCAG based on the growth forecast and the demographics they knew at that time. When compiling information, the cities cannot go back and revisit or change those numbers. Those were the numbers that were set in concrete and that is what the cities have to live with until the next set of numbers become available. C/Lin asked if Diamond Bar currently has high-rise units and CDD/Gubman said that at present, the City has two-story units and has nothing that would be considered mid or high rise. He believed that to achieve 30 -units per acre (a 50 percent increase over the current maximum density) would necessitate minimum three-story developments. Mr. Douglas said he has seen many projects that are three-story projects that are about 30 -units per acre. C/Lin asked if affordable housing means subsidized housing and Mr. Douglas responded "generally, yes." C/Lin asked how such units would be subsidized and Mr. Douglas said that it comes back to what was being discussed earlier, that cities do not have total control over the development process. Cities such as Diamond Bar certainly do not have lots of excess General Fund money to subsidize housing which is one of the reasons this Housing Element is referred to as a "planning" target and not a "quota." Cities that do not have funds that they can devote to housing means that the only way affordable housing can be built is through a subsidy from some MARCH 22, 2011 PAGE 5 PLANNING COMMISSION other source such as the federal government, state government, redevelopment agencies, etc. The legal framework that cities work in understands that a lot of things have to line up in order for subsidized affordable housing to be built and cities being held responsible for those portions of it that they have control over which is primarily zoning and development standards. Mr. Douglas further explained that typically, the way affordable housing is built is most often by non-profit developers. If, for example, a non-profit developer was interested and could assemble the sources of subsidy funds necessary to provide such a product, they would come to the City, submit an application, go through the development review process, etc., and underthose circumstances the Citywould not be required to contribute any money to the project. C/Torng asked if the City had to notify the City of Industry and the Water District as property owners before proposing those properties within the Housing Element. Mr. Douglas responded that the City of Industry was notified through the Housing Element process as an adjacent jurisdiction. All surrounding communities are notified of the proposed General Plan Amendment. When the City moves forward to the zone change stage of the process, certainly the property owner would be notified through the typical notification process. Certainly the City of Industry would be notified and have an opportunity to come and comment and as the property owner, the City of Industry would make the final decision about whatdevelopmentto pursue on those properties. If the City of Industry were to decide not to pursue any development at this time, there is nothing in the Housing Element or the zoning that would require or override the City of Industry's desire. C/Torng felt that potentially there would be a major population increase, additional traffic, etc., if 400 plus units were built in Tres Hermanos, for example and most likely no one would complain because there are no residents in the area so these sites are likely rendered redundant in the future. Mr. Douglas said the zone changes that are referenced in the Housing Element will not happen with adoption of this element because that is a separate process that would come at a later time and will come back to the Planning Commission and City Council for further consideration at which time there would be a thorough environmental review of traffic, noise, air- quality, and all other issues investigated through the environmental review process. C/Torng asked if a Specific Plan would be developed for this type of development. ACA/Wohlenberg stated that his office looked at the issue of the environmental review as well and at this point in the process it is too speculative to come up with the information the City would need to make environmental determinations because at this point no one knows how many units there will be and how many trips per day those units will generate so MARCH 22, 2011 PAGE 6 PLANNING COMMISSION those decisions, by necessity, have to be put off to a later stage where things get more specific. C/Torng again asked if a Specific Plan would be developed for this kind of a location when the site is rezoned. CDD/Gubman said that was a possibility. The portion of Tres Hermanos that lies within Diamond Bar is about 700 acres so one scenario would be to do a Specific Plan for all of Tres Hermanos that would include the parcels that are specifically being considered for a zone change. In fact, the City approached HCD with the idea that there would be an overlay over the entirety of Tres Hermanos that would state that the planning for Tres Hermanos shall be in the form of a Specific Plan and that Specific Plan shall include program elements to have an affordable housing component among the entire palette of uses that the 700 acres could be planned for. The HCD came back to the City and said they would expect the City to complete a Specific Plan in an unreasonably short period of time so although he believes a Specific Plan is the best strategy for Tres Hermanos, the only approach that HCD would accept in the Housing Element was for the City to look at rezoning specific properties within Tres Hermonos. Staff can comply with that and follow through with the rezoning. The City of Industry can say thank you very much for rezoning our property, but we have no interest in developing it and we have a big plan that we will look into in the future. CDD/Gubman said that C/Torng made a good observation and felt it was likely that all of Tres Hermanos would be master planned and this would become one component of that master plan. But if that does not happen Diamond Bar has satisfied its obligation by rezoning at least 15'/2 acres. C/Lin asked for confirmation that adoption of the Housing Element as part of the General Plan update would provide that the land use map for the City of Diamond Bar would identify this area as a high-density 30 -unit per acre land use and ACA/Wohlenberg responded that Chair was correct. Chair further commented that this adoption would not provide legal right for development. ACA/Wohlenberg said that an applicant would still have to do a zone change and bring a project forward for consideration and other steps would have to take place before anything could be built. VC/Lee asked if the City would have to go back to the drawing board if the City of Industry said thanks but no thanks to this amendment. CDD/Gubman said that the City of Industry would not have any veto authority. The City Council is the lawmaker in Diamond Bar and the City of Industry could object to the rezoning but it is the City Council that makes the decision on land -use matters in the City. The City of Industry could have the ultimate veto power by electing not to develop the property at all or as the property owner, they could elect to develop it at a lower density than what would be allowed. For example, if the City of Industry develops housing but it isnot at 30 -units per MARCH 22, 2011 PAGE 7 PLANNING COMMISSION acre, then that puts Diamond Bar in the position to have to locate other land to compensate for that shortfall that can no longer be accommodated on the site. VC/Lee asked if when submitting a plan does the City have to have an alternative site or is one site okay? Mr. Douglas reiterated that the way the law works is that the City is required to identify enough sites in the Housing Elements that can accommodate the City's need. So the sites that staff has shown the Commission tonight would accomplish that goal. When this gets to the City Council, the Council could decide those were not good sites and ask staff to find or consider other sites. But for purposes of satisfying the requirements, staff believes that what is in the proposed amendment satisfies the requirements. There is another related portion of state law that CDD/Gubman alluded to and that is if these sites were to be developed for something other than housing or for low density housing, the housing would then be required to amend the Housing Element to identify other sites that would satisfy the City's needs. VC/Lee asked if the emergency shelter was required to accommodate so many people a certain number of square feet per acre. Mr. Douglas explained that when staff comes back with the ordinance to implement the emergency shelter zone, the City has the authority to establish a variety of standards and regulations that would cover those emergency shelters and it includes things like the maximum number of beds, parking, landscaping, lighting, management plan, etc. VC/Lee asked if transitional housing meant that no one lived there on a permanent basis. Mr. Douglas said VC/Lee was correct. Transitional Housing is typically. a limited term. The difference between Emergency Shelter and Transitional Housing is usually about six months. Typically, an Emergency Shelter would not allow anyone to stay there longer than six months; Transitional or Supportive Housing often times could be a year or two and it is intended for families as opposed to a group home situation. Transitional Housing is typically for families in a single family home, condo or apartment unit and it is typically run through non-profit agencies that have standards such as clean and sober, zero tolerance for drug and alcohol abuse to be a participant in the program and it is a very different situation than some of the group homes the Commission discussed about six months ago. MARCH 22, 2011 PAGE 8 PLANNING COMMISSION VC/Lee asked if the distance criteria applied. Mr. Douglas reiterated that cities cannot establish any regulations on transitional and supportive housing units that do not apply to the entire City for a regular single family home. So unless a City had separation requirements for single family homes which they do not, then cities cannot establish any kind of separation requirements for transitional and supportive units either. VC/Lee asked if when this is identified, the City has to address the improvements to infrastructure to those areas. Mr. Douglas reiterated that those issues would be part of the process to review the zone changes during the environmental review process that looks at the site-specific details because as ACA/Wohlenberg mentioned, that level of detail is not yet available. Staff has identified a relatively large area that contains quite a bit more land than needed to meet the requirements for rezoning so as the City goes through the process to identify exactly which areas are appropriate to be rezoned that review of infrastructure, traffic and so forth will take place. Chair/Shah opened the public hearing. With no one present who wished to speak on this matter, Chair/Shah closed the public hearing. C/Torng moved, VC/Lee seconded, to recommend City Council approval of General Plan Amendment No. PL 2011-43 (2008-2014 Housing Element update). Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Nelson, Torng, VC/Lee, Chair/Shah NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Lin ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None C/Lin said he voted "no" because this is a target and not a quota which means to him that the City does not have to follow the state's instructions or requirements and when he was in another area of politics he had an unsatisfactory experience with affordable housing. It can cause a lot of fiscal problems for the City because the tax it receives is not close to paying for the services provided to high-density housing. 8.1 Variance No. PL 2010-422 — Under the authority of Development Code Section 22.54, the applicant, Gordon T. Myers and property owner, Steven Chu requested approval of variances to allow a swimming pool and a six-foot high fence within the front setback of a single family residence. The lot is zoned Rural Residential (RR) with an underlying General Plan land use MARCH 22, 2011 PAGE 9 PLANNING COMMISSION designation of Rural Residential. PROJECT ADDRESS: PROPERTY OWNER: APPLICANT: 2615 Braided Mane Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Steven Chu 2615 Braided Mane Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Gordon T. Myers Elegant Pools 31200 Landau Boulevard Cathedral City, CA 92234 C/Lin recused himself from consideration of this project because he owns property within the radius notification requirement and left the meeting. PT/Tobon presented staff's report and recommended Planning Commission denial of Variance No. PL 2010-422, based on the Findings of Fact. Staff has concluded that three of the five findings required to grant the variances cannot be made. VC/Lee asked why staff brought a request to the Planning Commission to deny a Variance. ACA/Wohlenberg responded that if an application is received for a variance there needs to be a decision made and that decision has to be made by the Planning Commission. Staff conducts its analysis and brings forth a recommendation to the Planning Commission but the Planning Commission has to ultimately make a yes or no decision on the Variance application. VC/Lee said in his experience with several other cities, the Variance was not processed before the Planning Commission. Are those cities wrong or is Diamond Bar too accommodating? ACA/Wohlenberg said he was not sure what those cities' processes would be but in all of the jurisdictions in which he works, an application may go forward with a recommendation of denial and generally, applicants like to avoid that because it tends to be a recommendation that carries significant weight with the Planning Commission. He has seen agencies encourage applicants to make changes so that staff does not have to put a denial recommendation on the project but ultimately, if the applicant wants it to move forward with the denial application, that is what staff will do. MARCH 22, 2011 PAGE 10 PLANNING COMMISSION C/Torng said he knows "The Country Estates" decision is irrelevant to the City's decision but he asked if the "The Country Estates" denied this project. PT/Tobon responded that "The Country Estates" approved the project. Chair/Shah opened the public hearing. Ron Stubna, Landscape Architect for the proposed project, stated that about eight months ago his firm was approached by the owner, Steven Chu who purchased the home six or seven years ago. Mr. Chu was not the person who rebuilt the home. As Mr. Chu has remodeled the home they have decided to add other amenities. The patio has shifted and is severely cracked so Mr. Chu asked his firm to design a new patio, pool, spa, barbecue, etc. At that point, Mr. Chu was not aware of the front yard issue because the pool is set to the side and toward the rear of the house. As this progressed through the association approval and approached the City, he and Mr. Chu learned that they would have to go through this Variance process. There are hedges along the front of the property which have been in existence long before Mr. Chu bought the property and those hedges do a very good job of screening where the pool would be. Even without those hedges, there is about eight feet of landscaping that can be used to screen the pool from the street. Braided Mane is a cul-de-sac so there are only six residents to the south of this property. Mr. Chu's house is set at a 45 degree angle at the intersection and he believes that is why there is a problem that warrants approval of a Variance. The other design issue of concern was the topography which is a 1:1 slope at the rear of the house and his firm wanted to make certain that that rear area remained in a natural condition. In fact, as part of the reconstruction process, the slope overlooks the canyon and the project will bring a lot of the native plant material back onto that slope to stabilize the slope and blend into the magnificent canyon view. In addition, he has learned that a six-foot high wrought iron fence is not required and they could reduce that to a five-foot high wrought iron fence as required by the building code. "The Country Estates" said that if there was an issue with a view of the pool that they would approve a block wall to completely mask the pool. Between the existing hedge and vegetation planned, there should be sufficient masking. Using an overhead view of the landscape plan, Gordon Myers, owner, Elegant Pools, pointed out the front entrance to the house and the garage door entrance. Because of the way the house is situated, the entrance is actually on the side of the house. Mr. Stubna pointed out that it is quite common to have unique situations with a combination of the topography and positioning of the homes in "The Country Estates" and for whatever reason, the construction of the home allowed for a flat place where the pool is MARCH 22, 2011 PAGE 11 PLANNING COMMISSION planned. He felt it would be an environmental negative to have to put in huge walls which require increased maintenance with natural earth movement, therefore, believes the proposed site is the safest and most convenient place to build the pool. Mr. Myers said this pool is proposed to be 3'/2 feet maximum depth and found the proposed site to be the best and safest location. The pool could be brought within the limits of the side yard setbacks and he believed the concern was whether this was a front yard or a side yard and when facing the property it appears to be on the side yard. Chair/Shah closed the public hearing. VC/Lee asked if staff had any other suggestions for compromise. CDD/Gubman said he believed there was a fundamental policy question that staff asked the Commission to consider and that is whether the applicant should be entitled to a pool, and on this property the only way to achieve that would be to encroach into the setbacks and of course, that leads to the variance request. It is true, given that there is very little flat pad, this area where the pool is proposed being the one viable location, there is no other option for them. So the fundamental question becomes that given this is the only available location for the pool without going through an extraordinary expense to build up a pad area in the rear, is that sufficient to warrant the granting of this variance or, should a pool simply be considered a luxury rather than a right. Either the applicant chooses to make a bigger footprint, or take into account that this is a difficult property and planning needs to take place before any development occurs for the types of the amenities the applicant would like to have within the constraints of the code. Staff would agree that there is no other place on the site to put a pool. But on the other hand, staff does not believe it can make the necessary findings to recommend that the Commission approve this variance. C/Nelson said that several weeks ago he was very concerned about some retaining walls that were not just a little bit above the City's Development Code but a lot above the City's Development Code, He continues to hold the belief that if the City gives variances that are extreme, even though the existing pools in the area that were developed under the County Code, then the City is simply diluting its Development Code. So he will support the denial and not support the approval of the pool because he does not want this City to be a blank check to develop whatever an applicant wants. Chair/Shah said that staff has studied the issues and brought up several concerns, none of which were addressed by the applicant despite the applicant being aware of those concerns. Second, he agrees with C/Nelson that if the City is going to dilute the regulations in place, there is no purpose MARCH 22, 2011 PAGE 12 PLANNING COMMISSION a 10. to having regulations. As an architect, he cannot necessarily agree with all of the arguments made by the applicant not having been offered an alternative. He understands that it is a matter of cost. On the other hand, it is a matter of choice. He respects the desire of the applicant and their effort in designing the site. However, he sees that several of the items identified in staff's report indicates that this variance should be denied. VC/Lee moved, C/Nelson seconded, to adopt staff's recommendation that the Planning Commission deny Variance No. PL 2010-422, based on the Findings of Fact. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Nelson, Torng, VC/Lee, Chair/Shah NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Lin CDD/Gubman stated that all Planning Commission decisions may be appealed to the City Council. An appeal of the Planning Commission decision must be filed with the City Clerk within 10 calendar days of the Planning Commission's decision. Should anyone wish to file an appeal they are instructed to contact the City Clerk for information about filing an appeal and/or obtaining an appeal petition. PLANNING COMMISSIONER COMMENTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: VC/Lee thanked his colleagues for supporting him as the Vice Chairman and offered his support to Chair/Shah, the Commission and residents. C/Torng congratulated Chair/Shah and VC/Lee on their appointments and wished them the best. He thanked staff for their good job this evening. Chair/Shah thanked his colleagues for the opportunity to serve the City as the Planning Commission Chairman. He thanked staff for their support during his tenure with City Commissions. STAFF COMMENTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 10.1 Public Hearing dates for future projects. CDD/Gubman congratulated Chair/Shah and VC/Lee on their appointments to their current positions on the Planning Commission. He said to call or email if there are any questions about future agenda items. He has enjoyed MARCH 22, 2011 PAGE 13 PLANNING COMMISSION working with all of the Commissioners and looks forward to working with the new Chair and Vice Chair for the coming year. CDD/Gubman stated that the Planners Institute was held in Pasadena last week. He attended two of the three days and felt the overall program was less interesting and included more retreads of previous sessions. There was a good session on medical marijuana by a colleague of CA/Jenkins who jointly wrote an article with him on the matter. It was interesting to hear other cities' challenges in dealing with this kind of business growth throughout the state. The budget issues that took a lot of previous year's session time has been somewhat supplanted by the current controversy about eliminating redevelopment agencies. As far as new planning concepts and trends, there was not really a whole lot of interesting new stories for folks to tell which is probably a symptom of the economic downturn where there just has not been enough development activity to see new interesting things occur in the last few years. With that said, he wanted to reassure the Commissioners that they did not miss a whole lot. CDD/Gubman stated that the next Planning Commission is scheduled for April 12 and the Commissioners will hear requests for a cell site on a wireless telecomunitations facility — a streetlight on Diamond Bar Boulevard as well as, a new single family residence on Wagon Train. 11. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: As listed in tonight's agenda. ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Planning Commission, Chairman Torng adjourned the regular meeting at 8:50 p.m. The foregoing minutes are hereby approved this 12th day of April, 2011. Attest: Respectfully Submitted, Greg Gubman Community Development Director Jack Shah, Chairman xi 1 •.I n . II l r —— L 5 r 5 - 5 ✓ l r' e :i �m PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT CITY OF DIAMOND BAR - 21825 COPLEY DRIVE - DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 - TEL. (909) 839-7030 - FAX (909) 861-3117 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 7.1 MEETING DATE: April 12, 2011 CASE/FILE NUMBER: Development Review No. 2007-25 and Tree Permit No. 2007-06 PROJECT LOCATION: 2706 Indian Creek Road PROPERTY OWNER: Basant Bhatia 581 S. Azusa Way La Puente, CA 91744 APPLICANT: Pete Volbeda 180 N. Benson Avenue, Unit D Upland, CA 91789 Summary The applicant is requesting a one year time extension for Development Review No. 2007-25 which consisted of an approval for the construction of a new single-family residence with an attached garage on a 1.18 gross acre lot. Tree Permit No. 2007-06 was an approval for the removal of one Black Walnut tree and replacement with three new 24 -inch box Black Walnut trees. The applicant is requesting a time extension due to prolonged review and approval of the project by The Country Estates Architectural Committee. Approval of the fuel modification plans were also delayed by the Los Angeles County Fire Department. The applicant is currently working with the Public Works/Engineering Department and Building and Safety Division to obtain grading permits and construction permits. The applicant has set up a tentative timetable for the project and plans to obtain a grading permit by the end of this month, and start construction in May. After evaluating the application, staff finds that the proposed one-year time extension application meets the requisite findings for approval. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the time extension for Development Review No. 2007-27 and Tree Permit No. 2007-06. BACKGROUND: On February 10, 2009, the Planning Commission approved Development Review No. 2007-25 and Tree Permit No. 2007-06 to construct a 9,513 square -foot, new single- family residence with a 1,802 square -foot attached garage on an existing 1.18 gross acre (51,401 gross square -foot) lot. The property is located in the Rural Residential (RR) zone with a consistent underlying General Plan land use designation. The original approval for the project included a two year time frame to obtain building or grading permits and begin construction. The staff report and resolution from the February 10, 2009, Planning Commission meeting is included in Attachment 2. ANALYSIS: Review Authority (Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.66.0501 An extension of time may be granted up to a maximum of one year when a request for an extension of time, with good cause, is submitted to the Community Development Department. The project has been delayed due to the prolonged review and approval of the project from The Country Estates Architectural Committee. Approval of the fuel modification plans were also delayed by the Los Angeles County Fire Department. The applicant has been working with the Building and Safety Division and Public Works/Engineering Department to start grading- and building retaining walls. The applicant has not yet obtained a grading permit, which is required prior to building permit issuance. Therefore, the applicant has been unable to start construction prior to the expiration date of the Planning Commission approval, and as a result submitted a request for an extension of time to the City on January 10, 2011. The extension of time request does not change the approved project in any way. The conditions of approval set forth in the Planning Commission Resolution No. 2009-03 will not change with the approval of an extension of time. Project Status The applicant is currently working with the Public Works/Engineering Department and Building and Safety Division to obtain grading permits and construction permits for the retaining walls. The applicant has set up a tentative time table for the project and plans to obtain a grading permit by this month and start construction in May. Because the applicant has been working with the Public Works/Engineering Department to finalize the grading plan, staff supports the applicant's request for a one year extension of time. Development Review No. 2007-25 and Tree Permit No. 2007-6 Page 2 of 3 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: On April 1, 2011, public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 500 - foot radius of the project site, and on April 1, 2011, the notice was published in the Inland Valley Daily Tribune and San Gabriel Valley Tribune newspapers. The project site was posted with a notice display board, and a copy of the public notice was posted at the City's three designated community posting sites. Public Comments Received At the time the staff report was published, staff had not received any comments from the public. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: This project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on that assessment, the City has determined the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to the provisions of Article 19 under Section 15303(a) (New Construction of One Single -Family Residence) of the CEQA Guidelines. No further environmental review is required to extend the time limit for the approved project. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution (Attachment 1) approving a one year extension of time for Development Review No. 2007-25 and Tree Permit No. 2007-6, based on the findings of Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.66.050 of the Development Code, subject to conditions of approval as listed within the draft resolution. Prepared by: Natalie Tobon Planning Technician Attachments: Reviewed by: Grace S. Lee Senior Planner 1. Draft Resolution No. 2011 -XX 2. Planning Commission Staff Report Dated February 10, 2009 and Resolution 2009-03 3. Approved Plans Development Review No. 2007-25 and Tree Permit No. 2007-6 rage s or s r S" Attachment 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -XX A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 2007-25 AND TREE PERMIT NO. 2007-06 TO CONSTRUCT A NEW 9,513 SQUARE -FOOT, THREE-STORY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE ON A 51,401 GROSS SQUARE -FOOT LOT LOCATED AT 2706 INDIAN CREEK ROAD, DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 (APN 8713-036-018). A. RECITALS 1. On February 10, 2009, the Planning Commission approved Development Review No. 2007-25 and Tree Permit No. 2007-06 to construct a new three- story 9,513 sq. ft. single-family residence located at 2706 Indian Creek Road, Diamond Bar, Los Angeles County, California ("Project Site"). Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review shall be referred to as the "Proposed Project." This approval included an initial two-year expiration date for the applicant to commence construction. 2. The subject property is made up of one parcel totaling 1.18 gross acres. It is located in the Rural Residential (RR) zone with a consistent underlying General Plan land use designation. 3. The legal description of the subject property is Tract 23483, Lot 102. The Assessor's Parcel Number is 8713-036-018. 4. Section 22.66.050 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code authorizes the Planning Commission to grant time extension for approved projects, provided that certain findings can be made to establish good cause for such time extensions. 5. Applicant, Pete Volbeda, on behalf of Basant Bhatia, has filed a request for a one-year extension of time for the Project. 6. On April 1, 2011, notification of the public hearing for this project was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers. Public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 500 -foot radius of the Project site and public notices were posted at the City's designated community posting sites. In addition to the published and mailed notices, the project site was posted with a display board. 7. On April 12, 2011, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing, solicited testimony from all interested individuals, and concluded said hearing on that date. B. RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: 1. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. On April 1, 2011, the Planning Commission determined the Project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to the provisions of Article 19 under Section 15303(a) (New Construction of One Single -Family Residence) of the CEQA Guidelines. No further environmental review is required to extend the time limit for the approved project. 3. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein, this Planning Commission hereby finds as follows: Extension of Time Findings Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein and as prescribed under Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Section 22.66.050, this Planning Commission hereby finds as follows: 1. There have been no changes to the provision of the General Plan, any applicable specific plan, the Subdivision Ordinance, or the Development Code applicable to the project since the approval of the Development Review; There have been no changes to the provision of the General Plan, any applicable specific plan, the Subdivision Ordinance, or the Development Code. The construction of a new single-family residence is consistent with the zoning designation and will not be altered in any way by approving the requested extension of time and all conditions of approval adopted by Planning Commission Resolution No. 2009-03 will remain in full force and effect. 2. There have been no changes to the character of the site or its surroundings that affect how the policies of the General Plan or other standards of the Subdivision Ordinance or the Development Code apply to the project; and Since the Planning Commission approved the project, there have been no changes to the character of the site or its surroundings that affect how the policies of the General Plan or other standards of the Subdivision Ordinance or the Development Code apply to the project. 3. There have been no changes to the capacities of community resources, including but not limited to water supply, sewage treatment or disposal facilities, roads or schools so that there is no longer sufficient remaining capacity to serve the project. Since the Planning Commission approved the project, there have been no changes to the capacities of community resources, including but not limited to water supply, sewage treatment or disposal facilities, roads or schools so that there is no longer sufficient remaining capacity to serve the project. 2 Based on the findings and conclusions set forth above and as prescribed under Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Section 22.66.050, this Planning Commission hereby approved the Application subject to the following conditions: 1. The project shall substantially conform to the approved plans as submitted and approved by the Planning Commission and on file with the Community Development Department. 2. All conditions of approval for Development Review No. 2007-25 and Tree Permit No. 2007-06 approved by Planning Commission Resolution No. 2009-03 shall remain in full force and effect except as amended herein. 3. This approval shall extend the expiration date of Development Review No. 2007-25 and Tree Permit No. 2007-06 to February 10, 2012. The Planning Commission shall: a. Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and b. Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail to the applicant, Pete Volbeda, 180 N. Benson Ave, Unit D, Upland, CA 91789, and the property owner, Basant Bhatia, 581 S. Azusa Way, La Puente, CA 91744. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12th DAY OF APRIL 2011, BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. Jack Shah, Chairman I, Greg Gubman, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of April, 2011, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: ABSTAIN: Commissioners: ATTEST: Greg Gubman, Secretary 41 Attachment 2 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT 21825 COPLEY DRIVE -DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 -TEL (909) 839 -7030 -FAX (909) 861-3117-www.Cityofdiamondbu.com AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: MEETING DATE: CASE/FILE NUMBER: PROJECT LOCATION: 7.1 February 10, 2009 Development Review No. 2007-25 2706 Indian Creek Road Diamond Bar, CA 91765 APPLICATION REQUEST: Approval to construct a three-story, 9,513 square -foot single family residence with an attached 1,802 square foot garage on an existing 1.18 acre Rural Residential (RR) zoned parcel with a consistent underlying General Plan Land Use designation of Rural Residential (RR). PROPERTY OWNERS: Basant Bhatia 17753 Via San Jose Rowland Heights, CA 91748-4168 APPLICANTS: Pete Volbeda 180 N. Benson Avenue Suite D Upland, CA 91786 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval with Conditions BACKGROUND: A. Site Description: The site is located in the Diamond Bar "Country Estates" and fronts on Indian Creek Road, which is a fully improved private street. The property is located near the end of the street and is a rectangular shaped vacant lot containing 1.18 gross acres (51,401 sq. ft.) of land area. The site is legally described as Lot 102 of Tract No. 23483, and the Assessor Parcel Number is 8713-036-018. B. Project Description: The applicant requests approval to construct a three-story, 9,513 square -foot single family residence with an attached 1,802 square -foot garage on an existing 1.18 acre parcel. The proposed dwelling unit contains six bedrooms and seven bathrooms. The applicant indicated that upon approval of the proposed project, the plans will then be submitted to the Diamond Bar Country Estates Homeowners Association for review and consideration. The applicant submitted an arborist report that indicates the existence of one multi - trunk Black Walnut Tree described in the report as "EXTREE 3". The arborist evaluated and deemed it to be in "fair" to "good" health. The tree is 20 to 25 feet in height and has a canopy spread of 15 to 20 feet, with four to six trunks that range in diameter from four to six inches. The tree is located within the building pad area and is proposed to be removed. Diamond Bar Development Code Section 22.38.130 requires that the removed protected trees shall be replaced at a ratio of 3:1 and that the replacement trees shall be 24 -inch box. The removal of the Black Walnut tree on site will require replacement with three (3) new Black Walnuts, with a minimum box size of 24 inches.. See the Analysis section of this staff report for further discussion of the proposed landscape plan. ANALYSIS: A. Review Authority (Diamond Bar Municipal Code Chapter 22.48) - New construction on a vacant lot requires Planning Commission approval of a Development Review application. B. Site and Surroundinq General Plan, Zoning and Uses Page 2 DR 2007-25 General Plan Designation Zoning District Land Use Site Rural Residential RR Vacant Land North Rural Residential RR Vacant Land South Rural Residential RR Single Family Residential East Rural Residential RR Single Family Residential West Rural Residential RR Sin le Family Residential Page 2 DR 2007-25 C. Development Review 1. Residential District General Development Standards: The following Table compares the proposed project with the City's Development Standards for Residential Development in the RR Zone. Development Residential Development Proposed Meets Feature Standards Requirements Front setback 30 feet 30 Feet Yes Side Setbacks 15 feet on one side & 15'-0" — south side Yes 10 on the other side. 11'-0" — north side Side yard minimum 25 feet 40'-0" — south side Yes between adjoining Vacant Lot to north structures Rear setback 25 feet 25 feet Yes Lot Coverage Maximum of 30% 12% Yes Building height limit 35 feet 35 feet Yes Retaining Wall Maximum Height 6 feet 6 feet Yes Height Landscaping 50% of front yard 63% Yes Driveway Width Maximum 14 feet @ PL 14 feet @ PL Yes Parking Parkin 2 in fully enclosed garage One 2 -car garage and Yes Chapter 22.30 one 3 -car garage for a total of 5 spaces 2. Site and Grading: The site steeply slopes in an easterly direction. The proposed building pad is located at the top of the slope with a view of the surrounding area. The average slope of the site is 29%. The applicant indicates that the proposed project will require 2200 cubic yards of cut, and 900 cubic yards of fill, resulting in 1300 cubic yards of material to be exported from the site. 3. Elevations: The architectural style is a Mediterranean design with concrete tile roof treatment, smooth stucco walls, stone veneer, and multi -paned windows. The applicant has provided color samples which call for earth - toned shades for the exterior finish to soften the buildings visual impact and assist in preserving the hillside's aesthetic value. 4. Landscaping: The subject property is located within the Los Angeles County Fire Department "Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone." Therefore, the proposed landscaping must comply with the Fire Department's Fuel Modification Plan requirements. The submitted preliminary landscape plan Page 3 DR 2007-25 indicates that the future landscaping will comply with the Fire Department's regulations and guidelines. The preliminary landscape plan indicates that 10 new trees will be planted on site. The size of the new trees will be 24 -inch box. In addition to the proposed trees, the applicant has proposed three (3) new 24 -inch box Black Walnut trees to replace the one proposed for removal. The applicant indicates that over 63% of the required front yard area will be landscaped with plant material. The tiered retaining walls and slopes at the rear of the property will be fully landscaped to screen the walls. Plant types proposed in these areas and throughout the front yard area are drought tolerant non-invasive plant species such as Star Jasmine, Day Lily, and Mock Orange. A condition of approval has been added requiring the avoidance of invasive species as identified by the California Plant Council. D. Compliance with Hillside Management Ordinance The proposed project has been reviewed for compliance with the City's Hillside Management Design Guidelines and regulations. Section 22.22.120(a)(1) of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code establishes a height limit of 35 feet as measured from the finished grade to the highest ridge beam. The submitted grading plans include several cross sections to demonstrate that the proposed structure will comply with the City's maximum building height requirements. E. General Plan, Design Guidelines and Compatibility with Neighborhood The proposed project complies with the goals and objectives as set forth in the adopted General Plan in terms of land use and density. The proposed project will not negatively affect the existing surrounding land uses, and the design and appearance of the proposed additions are compatible with the existing residence and surrounding community. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: Public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 500 -foot radius of the project site, and the notice was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers. A notice display board was posted at the site, and a copy of the legal notice was posted at the City's designated community posting sites. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: This project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on that assessment, the City has determined the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA in accordance with the provisions of Article 19 Section 15303(a) (New Construction of one single-family residence) of the CEQA Guidelines. No further environmental review is required. Page 4 DR 2007-25 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution approving Development Review No. 2007-25 based on the findings set forth under Section 22.48.040 of the Development Code, subject to conditions. Prepared by: Attachments: Reviewed by Greg Gubman, AICP Acting Community Development Director 1. Draft Resolution of Approval 2. Aerial Photo 3. Exhibit "A" — site plan, floor plan, roof plan, elevations Page 5 DR 2007-25 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2009-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 2007-25 FOR THE REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A THREE-STORY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE ON LOT NO. 102 OF TRACT 23483 LOCATED AT 2706 INDIAN CREEK ROAD, DIAMOND BAR, CA (APN 8713-036-018) A. RECITALS 1. The Planning Commission considered an application filed by Pete Volbeda, on behalf of the property owner, Basant Bhatia, requesting approval of plans to construct a new three-story, 9,513 square -foot single- family residence with an attached four -car, 1,802 square -foot garage. The location of the proposed project is 2706 Indian Creek Road. 2. The subject property is zoned Rural Residential (RR) and it contains 51,401 square feet (1.18 acres) of gross land area. The property in question is subject to the Rural Residential (RR) Development Code Standards. 3. The subject property is legally described as Lot 102 of Tract No. 23483, and the Assessor's Parcel Number is (APN) 8713-036-018. 4. Public Hearing notification was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers and property owners within a 500 -foot radius of the project site were notified of the proposed project by mail. Further, a public hearing notice display board was posted at the site, and the notice was posted at three other locations within the project vicinity. 5. On February 10, 2009, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing, solicited testimony from all interested individuals, and concluded said hearing on that date. B. RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: 1. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. The Planning Commission has determined the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA in accordance with the provisions of Article 19 Section 15303(a) (New Construction of one single-family residence) of the CEQA Guidelines. No further environmental review is required. 3. Based upon the information contained in the submitted plans, the associated staff report and testimony given at the public hearing the Planning Commission hereby finds as follows: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW a. The design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, development standards of the applicable zone district, design guidelines, and architectural criteria for specialized areas, (e.g., specific plans, community plans, boulevards, or planned developments.) The proposed single-family residence is consistent with the RR Zone's Development Standards and the City's Design Guidelines. In addition, the proposed project with conditions of approval is consistent, in terms of mass, scale and appearance, with the surrounding single-family dwelling units. b. The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future development, and it will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. The subject property is located within a designed and developed residential estate neighborhood. The existing public and private improvements are available to support the proposed development and the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed single-family residence will not negatively impact the existing or future development of the surrounding neighborhood. C. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the characteristics of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22.48 Diamond Bar Development Code, the General Plan, City Design Guidelines, or any applicable specific plan. The design of the proposed single-family residence is consistent with the goals and objectives of the long-range planning policy documents adopted by the City of Diamond Bar. The proposed project is compatible with the scope, scale and appearance of the surrounding existing development. The proposed project is an infill 2 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2009-03 development that will complement the neighborhood residential character. d. The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public, as well as its neighbors, through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, and color that will remain aesthetically appealing. The project's design and use of construction material are consistent with other single-family residences in the surrounding neighborhood. e. The proposed project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious (e.g., negative affect on property values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed single-family residence is consistent with the anticipated development pattern for the neighborhood and it will not negatively impact the public health, safety or general welfare. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusion set forth above, the Planning Commission hereby approves this Application subject to the following conditions: a. Planning Division (1) Development shall substantially comply with the plans and documents presented to the Planning Commission at the public hearing. (2) The project landscape plan shall avoid the use of invasive plant materials as identified by the California Invasive Plant Council. A complete list of the plant material to be avoided can be found at the following web address: www.calipc.org. (3) The applicant shall obtain the services of a licensed landscape architect to prepare the final landscape plans for the proposed project. The landscape plans shall include the design and selection of material for all hardscape, walls and fencing. The detailed landscape plans shall be submitted to the Community Development Director for review and approval, prior to issuance of building permits. (4) The required landscape plan shall be designed to meet the requirements of the Los Angeles County Fire Department's Fuel Modification Plan Guidelines in terms of plant selection, 3 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2009-03 placement and maintenance. The final landscape plan shall be submitted to the Fire Department for review and approval. (5) The landscape plan shall include the in-kind replacement of all protected trees that are removed from the site in order to accommodate the proposed development. The ratio of the replacement trees shall be 3:1. The minimum size of the replacement trees shall be 24 -inch box. The plan shall delineate the location of all trees that will be removed and the location of all new plant material to include the location of the replacement trees. (6) A certified arborist shall be retained to supervise the installation of the protected tree replacement to insure the survivability of the replacement trees. A report shall be provided to the Director of Community Development for review and approval. (7) A maintenance agreement shall be provided to the City indicating the property owner's responsibility to insure that the replacement trees will be properly maintained for a period of not less than five (5) years. A security deposit as determined by the Director shall be posted with the City. (8) Prior to submittal of plans for Building Division plan check all retaining walls associated with the lot pad shall be revised so that the exposed height does not exceed four feet. (9) The maximum exposed face of any freestanding retaining wall not associated with the lot pad shall be limited to six feet in height. The retaining walls shall be constructed of decorative masonry material approved by the Director. All retaining walls shall be screened with approved landscape material. b. Standard Conditions. The applicant shall comply with the standard development conditions attached hereto. The Planning Commission shall: a. Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and b. Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail to the applicant, Pete Volbeda, 180 N. Benson Ave., Suite D, Upland, CA 91786 and the property owner Mr. Basant Bhatia, 17753 Via San Jose, Rowland Heights, CA 91748. 4 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2009-03 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF February 2009, BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. M Steve Nelson, Chairman I, Greg Gubman, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of February, 2009, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN ATTEST: Commissioners: Commissioners Commissioners: Commissioners: Greg Gubman, Secretary Lee, Nolan, VC/Torng, Chair/Nelson None Shah None 5 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2009-03 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS USE PERMITS, COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL NEW AND REMODELED STRUCTURES PROJECT #: DR 2007-25 SUBJECT: New Single Family Residence PROPERTY Basant Bhatia OWNER: 17753 Via San Jose Rowland Heights, CA 91748 APPLICANT: Pete Volbeda 180 N. Benson Ave Ste. D Upland, CA 91786 LOCATION: 2706 Indian Creek Drive Diamond Bar, CA ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION AT (909) 839-7030, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. In accordance with Government Code Section 66474.9(b)(1), the applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, and its officers, agents and employees, from any claim, action, or proceeding to attack, set-aside, void or annul, the approval of Development Review No. 2007-25 brought within the time period provided by Government Code Section 66499.37. In the event the city and/or its officers, agents and employees are made a party of any such action: (a) Applicant shall provide a defense to the City defendants or at the City's option reimburse the City its costs of defense, including reasonable attorneys fees, incurred in defense of such claims. 6 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2009- (b) Applicant shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against the City descendents. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action of proceeding, and shall cooperate fully in the defense thereof. 2. This approval shall not be effective for any purpose until the applicant and owner of the property involved have filed, within twenty-one (21) days of approval of this Development Review No. 2007-25, at the City of Diamond Bar Community Development Department, their affidavit stating that they are aware of and agree to accept all the conditions of this approval. Further, this approval shall not be effective until the applicants pay remaining City processing fees, school fees and fees for the review of submitted reports. 3. All designers, architects, engineers, and contractors associated with this project shall obtain a Diamond Bar Business License; and a zoning approval for those businesses located in Diamond Bar. 4. Signed copies of Planning Commission Resolution No. 2009-03, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 5. Prior to the plan check, revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval. 6. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval shall be completed. 7. The project site shall be maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of approval and all laws, or other applicable regulations. 8. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and any applicable Specific Plan in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 9. Site, grading, landscape/irrigation and roof plans, elevations and sections shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of City permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.,) or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 10. The single family residence shall not be used in a manner that creates adverse effects upon the neighborhood and environmental setting of the residential site to levels of dust, glare/light, noise, odor, traffic, or other disturbances to the existing residential neighborhood and shall not result in significantly adverse effects on public services and resources. The single family residence shall not be used for 7 Planning commission Resolution No. 2009- commercial/institutional purposes, or otherwise used as a separate dwelling. The property shall not be used for regular gatherings which result in a nuisance or which create traffic and parking problems in the neighborhood. 11. Property owner/applicant shall remove the public hearing notice board within three days of this project's approval. 12. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of City Planning, Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works Department, and the Fire Department. B. FEES/DEPOSITS 1. Applicant shall pay development fees (including but not limited to Planning, Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works Department and Mitigation Monitoring) at the established rates, prior to issuance of building or grading permit (whichever comes first), as required by the City. School fees as required shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permit. In addition, the applicant shall pay all remaining prorated City project review and processing fees prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever come first. 2. Prior to any plan check, all deposit accounts for the processing of this project shall have no deficits. C. TIME LIMITS 1. The approval of Development Review No. 2007-25 shall expire within two years from the date of approval if the use has not been exercised as defined per Municipal Code Section 22.66.050 (b)(1). The applicant may request in writing a one year time extension subject to Municipal Code Section 22.60.050(c) for Planning Commission approval. D. SITE DEVELOPMENT 1. The project site shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the approved plans submitted to, approved, and amended herein by the Planning Commission, collectively attached hereto as Exhibit "A" including: site plans, floor plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to the issuance of any permits, the Applicant shall complete and record a "Covenant and Agreement to Maintain a Single -Family Residence" on a form to be provided by the City. The covenant shall be completed and recorded with the Los Angeles County Recorders Office. 8 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2009- 3. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, air conditioning condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berms, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Division. E. LANDSCAPE, PRESERVED AND PROTECTED TREES 1. Prior to issuance of any permits, detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval. 2. Prior to issuance of any permits, the method of tree replacement shall be determined. Trees that will be replaced on site shall be plotted on the final landscape plan for the City's review and approval. 3. Prior to plan check submittal, a final landscape/irrigation plan shall be submitted with the type of planting materials, color, size, quantity and location including proposed sites for the planting of protected/preserved trees and additional species to mask the retaining wall height. 4. Prior to the Planning Division's final inspection and/or Certificate of Occupancy issuance, the landscaping/irrigation shall be installed or replaced. Any dense plant material proposed in the front setback shall not exceed a 42 inches maximum height. 5. Prior to the Planning Division's final inspection, a total of three Black Walnut trees shall be planted on site for the replacement of the one Black Walnut tree of good health being removed. 6. Prior to the issuance of City permits, the applicant shall submit revegetation landscape and irrigation plans for slopes within the project site for Planning Division review and approval. Said slope shall be landscaped at the completion of grading activities. All slope planting, irrigation and revegetation areas shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition. 7. Prior to releasing occupancy, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that the slope vegetation is in satisfactory condition. 8. Retaining walls shall not exceed an exposed height of six (6) feet as delineated in Exhibit "A". All retaining walls shall be earth tone in color and constructed from decorative material (i.e., split face, stacked stone, etc.) Retaining walls or fences located within the front yard setback shall not exceed an exposed height of 42 inches. 9 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2009- F. SOLID WASTE 1. The site shall be maintained in a condition, which is free of debris both during and after the construction, addition, or implementation of the entitlement approved herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether during or subsequent to construction shall be done only by the property owner, applicant or by a duly permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste from residential, commercial, construction, and industrial areas within the City. It shall be the applicant's obligation to insure that the waste contractor used has obtained permits from the City of Diamond Bar to provide such services. 2. Mandatory solid waste disposal services shall be provided by the City franchised waste hauler to all parcels/lots or uses affected by approval of this project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, (909) 839-7040, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. GENERAL 1. An Erosion Control Plan shall be submitted concurrently with the grading plan clearly detailing erosion control measures. These measures shall be implemented during construction. The erosion control plan shall conform to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards and incorporate the appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP's) as specified in the Storm Water BMP Certification. For construction activity which disturbs one acre or greater soil a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be needed. Please refer to City handouts. 2. The applicant shall comply with Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) requirements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Please refer to City handouts. 3. Grading and construction activities and the transportation of equipment and materials and operation of heavy grading equipment shall be limited to between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. Dust generated by grading and construction activities shall be reduced by watering the soil prior to and during the activities and in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 402 and Rule 403. Reclaimed water shall be used whenever possible. In addition, all construction equipment shall be properly muffled to reduce noise levels. 10 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2009- B. SOILS REPORT/GRADING/RETAINING WALLS 1. Prior to grading plan submittal, a geotechnical report prepared by a Geotechnical Engineer, licensed by the State of California, shall be submitted by the applicant for approval by the City. 2. Upon approval of the geotechnical report, the applicant shall submit drainage and grading plans prepared by a Civil Engineer, licensed by the State of California, prepared in accordance with the City's requirements for the City's review and approval. A list of requirements for grading plan check is available from the Public Works Department. All grading (cut and fill) calculations shall be submitted to the City concurrently with the grading plan. 3. Finished slopes shall conform to City Code Section 22.22.080 -Grading. 4. All easements and flood hazard areas shall be clearly identified on the grading plan. 5. The grading plan shall show the location of any retaining walls and the elevations of the top of wall/footing/retaining and the finished grade on both sides of the retaining wall. Construction details for retaining walls shall be shown on the grading plan. Calculations and details of retaining walls shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for review and approval. 6. All equipment staging areas shall be located on the project site. Staging area, including material stockpile and equipment storage area, shall be enclosed within a six foot -high chain link fence. All access points in the defense shall be locked whenever the construction site is not supervised. 7. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the California Building Code, City Grading Ordinance, Hillside Management Ordinance and acceptable grading practices. 8. The maximum grade of driveways serving building pad areas shall be 15 percent. In hillside areas driveway grades exceeding 15 percent shall have parking landings with a minimum 16 feet deep and shall not exceed five (5) percent grade or as required by the City Engineer. Driveways with a slope of 15 percent shall incorporate grooves for traction into the construction as required by the City Engineer. 9. All slopes shall be seeded per landscape plan and/or fuel modification plan with native grasses or planted with ground cover, shrubs, and trees for erosion control upon completion of grading or some other alternative method of erosion control shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and a permanent irrigation system shall be installed. 11 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2009- 10. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a pre -construction meeting shall be held at the project site with the grading contractor, applicant, and city grading inspector at least 48 hours prior to commencing grading operations. 11. Rough grade certifications by project soils and civil engineer shall be submitted prior to issuance of building permits for the foundation of the residential structure. Retaining wall permits may be issued without a rough grade certificate. 12. As -graded geotechnical report shall be submitted for review and approval prior to any issuance of building permits. Retaining wall permits may be issued with the grading permit. 13. Final grade certifications by project soils and civil engineers shall be submitted to the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of any project final inspections/certificate of occupancy respectively. C. DRAINAGE 1. Detailed drainage system information of the lot with careful attention to any flood hazard area shall be submitted. All drainage/runoff from the development shall be conveyed from the site to the natural drainage course. No on-site drainage shall be conveyed to adjacent parcels, unless that is the natural drainage course. 2. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a complete hydrology and hydraulic study shall be prepared by a Civil Engineer registered in the State of California to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Los Angeles Public Works Department. D. UTILITIES 1. Applicant shall relocate and underground any existing on-site utilities to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the respective utility owner. 2. Underground utilities shall not be constructed within the drip line of any mature tree except as approved by a registered arborist. E. SEWERS/SEPTIC TANK 1. Any homeowner that installs a new septic tank system, repairs and existing septic tank or adds any plumbing fixture units or bedroom equivalents to the facility served by an existing septic system will need to submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to the Regional Water Quality Control Board for Waste Discharge Requirements and submit a copy of the sent NO[ and check to the City. Please refer to City handouts. 2. SEPTIC TANK: The Applicant shall show septic tanks location, size and details on the plans. The Los Angeles County Health Department, California Water 12 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2009- Control Board and the City's Geotechnical Engineer shall approve these plans prior to the issuance of any permits. The property owner shall be required to sign and record the City's Covenant for use of a septic system. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 839-7020, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Plans shall conform to State and Local Building Code (i.e., 2007 California Building Code, California Plumbing Code, California Mechanical Code, and California Electrical Code) requirements and all other applicable construction codes, ordinances and regulations in effect at the time of plan check submittal. 2. Application for which no permit is issued within 180 days following the date of application shall expire by limitation, and plans and other data submitted for review. may thereafter be returned to the applicant or destroyed by the Building Department. 3. Every permit issued by the Building Department shall expire if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit. 4. The minimum design load for wind in this area is 85 M.P.H. exposures "C" and the site is within seismic category (D). The applicant shall submit drawings and calculations prepared by a California State licensed Architect/Engineer with wet stamp and signature. 5. The applicant shall submit a foundation and soils investigation report. 6. This project shall comply with the energy conservation requirements of the State of California Energy Commission. Kitchen and bathroom lights shall be fluorescent or controlled by a manual-on/auto off, occupant sensor. 7. Construction activities causing the operation of any tools or equipment used in construction, drilling, repair, alteration, or demolition work shall be conducted Mon. -Sat. between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. 8. A height survey may be required at completion of framing. 9. Indicate the proposed building on the plans. Submit code analysis and justification showing the following: a. Each building square foot b. Each building height C. Type of construction d. Each group occupancy e. Property line location in relation to each building (side yard) 13 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2009- Prior to Building permit issuance, Walnut Valley School District fees must be paid. Please obtain a form from the Building and Safety Division to take directly to the school district. Walnut Valley School District 880 S Lemon Ave Walnut, CA 91789 (909)595-1261 10. Please submit a total of 5 full set of plans including the grading for review to the Building and Safety Division after the plans have been approved by the Planning Division/Com mission. 11. Indicate all easements on the site plan. 12. Foundation systems on expansive soil shall be constructed in a manner that minimizes damage to the structure from movement of the soil. Depth of foundation below the natural and finish grade shall be not less than 24 inches for exterior and 18 inches for interior foundations. 13. All retaining walls shall be submitted to the Building and Safety and Public Work Departments for review and approval. 14. Submit grading plans showing clearly all finish elevations, drainage, and retaining wall locations. No building permits shall be issued prior to submitting a pad certification. 15. The project shall be protected by a construction fence and shall comply with the NPDES & BMP requirements (sand bags, etc.) 16. Check drainage patterns with Engineering Department. Surface water shall drain away from building at a 2% minimum slope. 17. Private property sewer/septic system shall be approved by the Los Angeles County Health Department and the California Water Control Board. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE PREVENTION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Fire Department approval is required. Contact the Fire Department to check the fire zone for the location of your property. If this project is located in Very High Severity Fire Zone it shall meet of requirements of the fire zone. 14 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2009- a. All unenclosed under -floor areas shall be constructed as exterior wall. b. All openings into the attic, floor and/or other enclosed areas shall be covered with corrosion -resistant wire mesh not less than 1/4 inch or more than 1/2 inch in any dimension except where such openings are equipped with sash or door. 2. Emergency access shall be provided, maintaining free and clear, a minimum 28 foot at all times during construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. 3. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be submitted to the Fire Department that temporary water supply for fire protection is available pending completion of the required fire protection system. 4. All required fire hydrants shall be installed and tested and accepted prior to construction. Vehicular access must be provided and maintained serviceable throughout construction for fire protection and available pending completion of the required fire protection system. 5. All required fire hydrants shall be installed and tested and accepted prior to construction. Vehicular access must be provided and maintained serviceable throughout construction. End 15 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2009- 66 1\0 j/ / e2\2® ! A;zl 2 j _ \ /�/�/ III SITE PLAN m§GEk K�±0 N .m�_:r_ a 91786_ 0� 2706 INDIAN CREEK. _w» 909 373 1150 FAX 909 373 152 \ \ ! 2 -7 0 > oa �([!R7 ; _ /e \ ( \\/\ ^ �- /} Q° 66 1\0 j/ / e2\2® ! A;zl 2 j _ \ /�/�/ III SITE PLAN m§GEk K�±0 N .m�_:r_ a 91786_ 0� 2706 INDIAN CREEK. _w» 909 373 1150 FAX 909 373 152 \ \ �•. r X111 iii I1' !I::1'i il# I'�'!� �' � � � Fv �i 1'jil 1� 1''111!Irll!I• ' gg m� it j 1 �.� {I I�!.itllii'• nggA m$ � �J au. �"'it �1i 1 ' e9 7g ���� ii®�®Eup 11P6'i�ouLwo Nfln ig 'b0 N BENSON AVE, SUTE D UPLAND CA 91786 MR BHA11A DRN 2007-25 CUP -14 2706 INDIAN CREEK. DIAMOND BAR CA 91765—Tr-rl TEL 909 3731150 FAX 909 373 1152 v x 0 g v m C) D m o o 9 m 0-0 -. u ry 3 7 -O m m O'O C > > O p 0 m 3 3 0 3 g O (D y y mm�mwewm NNN�m zx� Z o y n (n � 16 2 p Km Q 3 ' _0 5 ,. C) i 'Q r➢ri O c 0 o o N � n z p i —m r m m � s r y y mm�mwewm NNN�m zx� Z N mm N419�yyA „_x mPioi;O��=o�� Km T. 88Aya.9y�ng�z Sim � O D k £p n >g N ,. i 'Q r➢ri � Na`z€£=zessN o o z p i PETE VOLHEnp 4vh Loowrc PhFnpg SITE PLAN BHATIA 7706 INDIAN CRFFK. DRN 2007-25 CA 91] 917655 6 OIAIdONO RAR 180 N BENSON AVE, TEL 909 373 RSO SUITE D UPLAND CA 91786 FAX 909 373 152 } A �e �} PETE N®6®E®P A�i&Awpa Plowing °" - �. 180 N BE43ON AVE, SLATE D UPLADD CA 9786 y I MR BHAIA DRN 2007-25 CUP, -14 _.___ TEL 9095731150 FAX 909373052 1 •q1'. li 1111• •...• 1 �� � �� i ::.I{I i �'1 .�:I• '�111� 5�B a`p �is�"� � icy' l i { .IG ,•\'I .'I .!:��'!1''I "J)1 A �e �} PETE N®6®E®P A�i&Awpa Plowing °" - �. 180 N BE43ON AVE, SLATE D UPLADD CA 9786 y I MR BHAIA DRN 2007-25 CUP, -14 _.___ TEL 9095731150 FAX 909373052 9 / J %I7".=mDRN DIAMOND BAR \CUP2` FETE §Eo«p Apuht&LWR M_m r.BBW.AVE ' _ ,a_ a 9V66s 909mm FAX 909er `\\!\±`� . ,«i \ \ P @ 73 01 H 7 §� \� FETE §Eo«p Apuht&LWR M_m r.BBW.AVE ' _ ,a_ a 9V66s 909mm FAX 909er SITE SECTIONS YR SHAM. ARORA cn M 0 z a �s PETE VO6®OOR 4�kil MLLM Flamm 100 N BE19M A4 , SIVE D IRLM G 97M la 909 373 W FAX 909 3731152 1 b IN I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I p I 0 L L L I_ L L L i � I:10 �` i i i I 3• :. I I I II_ IEFII I I I p p0111 III€II I I I I smJo z �Ilfl�ll__IrLi�II C) 4' I-II zI I IIII II= I ilif°II - I - I � I = IN lu IpcII II IN IO IN II 10 IN I -I � p g 1yb 15 15 ppp 111I}=}1 1 I I I I I I 1 1 i i l i l i I I I i I 3 SITE SEC110NS PEY�V®6®P®II f ehlLgst, �� 150 N BENSON AVE., SUTE D I1PI..AW C 917 V) HES FCR Mft DHAIIR Td 909 373 150 Fqy qq yt pg ti 2706 INDIAN MEM DIAMOND BAH CA 91765 o I u II f f o v (n R7 C) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I p I > L L L I_ L L L i - PP PP pp pp r r G G m i i i i I II 14'-D' I A I I y I I�-Ind I I I I II I II_ IEFII I I I p p0111 III€II I I I I smJo z �Ilfl�ll__IrLi�II I I I I I I 1 1 i i l i l i I I I i I 3 SITE SEC110NS PEY�V®6®P®II f ehlLgst, �� 150 N BENSON AVE., SUTE D I1PI..AW C 917 V) HES FCR Mft DHAIIR Td 909 373 150 Fqy qq yt pg ti 2706 INDIAN MEM DIAMOND BAH CA 91765 BASEMENT PLAN ��o�e�as®aa�� s3 o A cn�v�ae MR BHAPA, ABOBA BRN 200)-25 NP -14 �g 909 373 M FAX 9 3731152 0 ED r 8 I _Y� ,i i O 1 A 1_1 ______ _ __µ,Y 9 1 1 1 1 O I I q El 4 c q a o o 0 ; 0 0 A 1 iZ 4 I o i k o 0 0 Nil 2ND FLOOR PLAN WN®6"®R WE 97a6 gp N BB9:Y! A1E.9fIE D IPINO G 9VE6 cn YA BXAMI A _ wUl-v4 WP -If m 90995150 FAX 90P M IM 2m Imm pl 65 PLAN PAYE N ump rchLgo,rft r"rc I80 N BENSON AVE. SLATE U LPI.AID CA. 9966 AROMA OBN 2007-25 QIP -19 TEL 909 373 W FAX 909373 1152 0 F9 m m b i O Z W Q c Q m N N I 1 21GHT ELEVATION PETE VoLu ®R RpAffdwo Pbm" IBO N BB4" AVE, WTE D WL" G YWW MR BNAIIA• AflIXiA DW 2-7-25 CUP -14 TEL 9W J79 050 FAX 909 373 052 i I I I I I I I 11 I 1 21GHT ELEVATION PETE VoLu ®R RpAffdwo Pbm" IBO N BB4" AVE, WTE D WL" G YWW MR BNAIIA• AflIXiA DW 2-7-25 CUP -14 TEL 9W J79 050 FAX 909 373 052 4LEFT ELEVATION 1 NP BOAPA, AftOPA i 1 I 11 I I I I I 1 t �I I I I I I li II I IN 1 jl 1 t 1 � ii l�j I ii I 1 1 I I I I 1 m 1 m 1 1 1 I 11 II I 1 1 I I I H I I I I 11 I I I I I 1 t I I I I I li II I 1 jl 1 t 1 � ii l�j ; 111 1 1 11 I 1 1 I I I I 1 m 1 m 1 1 1 I 11 11 II 1 I 11 1 I I I 8 YE MUmp Pw#LmLlffv rkm ; Ip0 N 99dl5(Xd AVE, 5111E D WLA G 9V66 11 909 373 W FAX 909 393114 CIT PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT CITY OF DIAMOND BAR - 21825 COPLEY DRIVE - DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 - TEL. (909) 839-7030 - FAX (909) 861-3117 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 7.2 MEETING DATE: April 12, 2011 CASE/FILE NUMBER: Development Review No. PL 2010-289 PROJECT LOCATION: 3010 Wagon Train Lane, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 (APN 8713-019-004) PROPERTY OWNER: Hai Nguyen 3057 Windmill Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 APPLICANT: Stewart Beck 2915 Redhill Avenue, Suite G102 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Summary The applicant is requesting Development Review approval to demolish the existing residence on the property and construct a new single-family residence consisting of 7,432 square -foot living space; two garages totaling 1,968 square feet; a 1,302 square - foot indoor pool area; and. 1,573 square -feet covered porches and loggias. The architectural style of the building is Italian Revival, which is a mixture of Classic Italian Villa and Italian Country. The two story section of the building is designed in the Classic Italian Villa architectural style. The two outer wings of the building (the indoor pool and guest room) were designed in the Italian Country architectural style. The landscaping was designed to incorporate Mediterranean plants and trees, such as olive trees and lavender. The plants used are low maintenance, drought tolerant plants that are appropriate for the local climate. After evaluating the application, staff finds that the proposed Development Review complies with the City's development standards and meets the findings required of the project. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review No. PL 2010-289, subject to the conditions of approval contained in the attached Resolution. BACKGROUND: Site Description: The site is located in The Diamond Bar Country Estates (The Country) and is located on the southwesterly corner of Wagon Train Lane and Windmill Drive. In 1977, the property was developed under Los Angeles County standards with a 2,921 square -foot home and 770 square -foot garage on a 1.29 gross acre (56,192 square -foot) lot. There are no protected trees on-site. A lot line adjustment was approved at the rear of the property on February 18, 2011 and recorded on March 11, 2011. The lot line adjustment increased the length of the property by approximately 112 feet to the rear. The application process was simplified and expedited because the subject property and the property located behind it are owned by the same property owner. The applicant decided to adjust the rear property line in order to provide sufficient lot depth to accommodate the proposed project design. The site is legally described as Lot 27 of Tract No. 30289, and the Assessor's Parcel Number (APN) is 8713-019-004. Project Description The proposed new single-family home consists of the following components • 4,772 square -feet of first floor living area including a guest room, sewing room, library/office, living room, dining room, kitchen, "dirty kitchen", and family room; • 2,660 square -feet of second floor living area including three bedrooms, three bathrooms, and a laundry room; • Two garages totaling 1,968 square feet; • A 1,302 square -foot indoor pool area; and • 1,573 square -feet of covered porches and loggias. The height of the building is 30'-7", measured from the finished grade to the highest point of the roofline. The applicant has obtained approval from The Diamond Bar Country Estates Association. Development Review No. PL 2010-289 Page 2 of 9 Site and Surrounding General Plan Zoning and Land Uses General Plan Zoning District Designation Land Use Site Rural Residential RR Single -Family Residential North Rural Residential Rural Residential Rural Residential RR RR RR Single -Family Residential Single -Family Residential Single -Family Residential South East West Rural Residential RR Single -Family Residential r 14 TA\ RR Project Location w �+ N ,s Development Review No. PL 2010-289 Page 3 of 9 ANALYSIS: Review Authority (Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Section 22.48) Construction of a new single-family residence requires Planning Commission approval of a Development Review application. Development Review approval is required to ensure compliance with the City's General Plan policies, development standards and design guidelines, and to minimize adverse effects of the proposed project upon the surrounding properties and the City in general. Development Review The following table compares the proposed project with the City's development standards for residential development in the RR zone: � Residential Proposed Meets Development Feature Development Requirements Standards Front Setback 30' 30' Yes 15-0" on one side Side Setbacks & 22'— east side Yes 10'-0" on the other 62'— west side side. Street Side Setback 15' on reversed 22' Yes cornerlot Side Yard Minimum 105'— west side Between Adjoining 25' 260'— east side Yes Structures Rear Setback 25' 114' Yes Lot Coverage Maximum of 30% 12% Yes Building Height Limit 35'-0" 30'-7° Yes Parking 2 -car garage 5 -car garage Yes Site and Grading Configuration: The applicant is proposing to cut 400 cubic yards and fill 50 cubic yards of soil. The export of the remaining 350 cubic yards of soil would take approximately 25-35 truck trips to move the soil off-site. The existing property was previously graded to create a flat pad throughout most of the property. Towards the rear of the property, there is a slope that drops about 20 feet. The applicant designed the proposed project to integrate the existing topographical features of the site and minimize grading. Development Review No. PL 2010-289 Page 4 of 9 Elevations: The architectural style of the building is Italian Revival, which is a mixture of Classic Italian Villa and Italian Country. The two story section of the building is designed in the Classic Italian Villa architectural style. The two outer wings of the building (the indoor pool and guest room) were designed in the Italian Country architectural style. The Italian Revival architectural style includes the following design features: • Low pitched, hipped roofs; Projecting eaves supported by corbels; Masonry exterior such as brick; • Recessed entry; • Rectangular chimneys; and • Loggias. The applicant provided color samples which call for earth tone colors for the exterior finish to soften the building's visual impact on the hillside. Front Elevation Landscaping: The front yard will be 75% landscaped with trees and other plant materials and will achieve full coverage prior to the required two years. Landscaping is used to soften the look of the paved surfaces, enhance the architecture, and create an overall site design that blends in with neighboring homes and the natural environment of the site. The main focus of the landscaping design was to use Mediterranean plants that are low maintenance and drought tolerant. The design incorporates olive trees and lavender as well as other plant material that is used in the Mediterranean climate because it is similar to the climate in Southern California. In the front yard, four 24 -inch box orange trees are proposed along the front entrance. Ground cover in the front yard will predominately consist of shrubs such as Raphiolepis, Crimson and Grey Geranium; Crimson Geranium Little Rev, and Spanish Lavender. These shrubs grow up to Development Review No. PL 2010-289 Page 5 of 9 4 feet in height which serve as vertical elements to complement the overall design. Landscaping is also used to create a smooth transition between the street and the homes. Shrubs and ground covers such as Prostrate Coyote Brush, Pride of Madeira, Blue Pickle, and Mexican Sage are some of the plants used between the building and the street. Pride of Madeira All plant types will be drought tolerant and non- invasive species. The project is required to comply with the new water -efficient landscape requirements, which is noted on the preliminary landscape plans and will be verified during building plan check. The subject property is located within the Los Angeles County Fire Department "Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone." Therefore, the proposed landscaping must comply with the Fire Department's Fuel Modification Plan requirements. The proposed landscaping plans will be submitted for review and approval by the Fire Department during building plan check. Compliance with Hillside Management Ordinance (DBMC Section 22.22) The proposed project was reviewed for compliance with the City's Hillside Management Design Guidelines and regulations. DBMC Section 22.22.120 (a) (1) establishes a height limit of 35 feet as measured from the finished grade to the highest point of the roofline. The project demonstrates that the proposed building will be 30'-7" at the highest point. The project site was designed to: • Fit the existing land form as much as possible by using the existing lot pad and minimize grading; • All retaining walls are a maximum of four feet; • The building is designed to be parallel to the existing contours; and • Native vegetation is to be retained along the slopes at the side and rear of the property. The project complies with all of the regulations and guidelines to ensure that development will complement the character and topography of hillside areas set forth in the Development Code. Compatibility with Neighborhood The proposed project complies with the goals and objectives as set forth in the adopted Development Review No. PL 2010-289 Page 6 of 9 General Plan in terms of land use and density. The project will not negatively affect the existing surrounding land uses, and the design and appearance of the proposed single- family residence is compatible with the surrounding community. The project is designed to be compatible and complementary to the neighborhood, and incorporates the principles of the City's Residential Design Guidelines as follows: • The proposed new single family residence will conform to all development standards, including building height and setbacks, which is consistent with other homes in the neighborhood. A transition between the project and adjacent properties is achieved through appropriate setbacks and landscaping; • Building placement was considered for maximum tree and plant growth potential; • The architectural design accentuates simplicity of line and form and restrained and understated elegance; • Overhangs, projections and recesses of stories, porches, balconies, and reveals are integrated into the design; • Placement and relationship of windows, doors, and other window openings are carefully integrated with the building's overall design; • Large wall expanses are avoided; • The air conditioning and trash enclosures are architecturally compatible to the main structure and blend in with the building in terms of materials, color, shape, and size; • Landscaping is used to emphasize and highlight focal points such as gardens, patios and walkways; and • The project is designed to be appropriate in mass and scale to the site. Adjacent Home to West Project Site Adjacent Home to East Development Review No. PL 2010-289 Page 7 of 9 Additional Review The Public Works Department and Building and Safety Division reviewed this project, and their comments are included in the attached resolution as conditions of approval. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: On April 1, 2011, public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 1,000 - foot radius of the project site and the notice was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers. A notice display board was posted at the site, and a copy of the notice was posted at the City's three designated community posting sites. Public Comments Received On April 7, 2011, the neighboring resident located at 3000 Windmill Drive contacted staff with questions and concerns about the proposed project. The neighbor is concerned that the proposed two-story home would obstruct her view of the City. Currently, the height of the existing home is approximately 19 feet. The height of the two outer wings of the proposed building is 17'-2", and the two-story section of the building is 30'-7". The height of the building is lower than the 35 -foot maximum height allowed by the Development Code. In addition, staff visited the site and observed that the building pad of the subject property is slightly lower than the neighbor's building pad. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: This project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on that assessment, the City has determined the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to the provisions of Article 19 Section 15301 (1) (2) (Demolition of a Single Family Residence) and 15303 (a) (Construction of a New Single Family Residence) of the CEQA Guidelines. No further environmental review is required. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution (Attachment 1) approving Development Review No. PL 2010-289, to construct a new single-family residence consisting of 7,432 square feet of living space, two garages totaling 1,968 square feet, 1,302 square -foot indoor pool area, and 1,573 square -foot covered porches and loggia, based on the findings of DBMC Section 22.48, subject to conditions of approval as listed within the draft resolution. Development Review No. PL 2010-289 Page 8 of 9 Prepared by: Na alie Tobon Planning Technician Attachments: Reviewed by: Gra S. Lee Senior Planner 1. Draft Resolution Approving DR No. PL 2010-289 2. Site Plan, Floor Plans, Elevations, and Landscape Plans Development Review No. PL 2010-289 Page 9 of 9 1 Attachment 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -XX A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. PL 2010-Z89 TO DEMOLISH AN EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY HOME AND CONSTRUCT A NEW 7,432 SQUARE -FOOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, TWO GARAGES TOTALING 1,968 SQUARE FEET, AND 1,302 SQUARE -FOOT INDOOR POOL ON A 1.88 GROSS ACRE (82,015 SQUARE -FOOT) LOT LOCATED AT 3010 WAGON TRAIN DRIVE, DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 (APN 8713-019-004). A. RECITALS 1. The property owner, Hai Nguyen, and applicant, Stewart Beck, have filed an application for Development Review No. PL 2010-289 to demolish an existing residence and construct a new 7,432 square -foot single family residence, two garages totaling 1,968 square feet, and a 1,302 square -foot indoor pool located at 3010 Wagon Train Drive, City of Diamond Bar, County of Los Angeles, California. Hereinafter in this resolution, the subject Development Review shall collectively be referred to as the "Project." 2. The subject property is made up of one parcel totaling 82,015 square feet (1.88 gross acres). It is located in the Rural Residential (RR) zone with an underlying General Plan land use designation of Rural Residential. 3. The legal description of the subject property is Tract 30289 Lot 27. The Assessor's Parcel Number is 8713-019-004. 4. On April 1, 2011, notification of the public hearing for this project was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers. Public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 1,000 -foot radius of the Project site and public notices were posted at the City's designated community posting sites on April, 1, 2011. In addition to the published and mailed notices, the project site was posted with a display board and the notice was posted at three other locations within the project vicinity. 5. On April 12, 2011, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing, solicited testimony from all interested individuals, and concluded said hearing on that date. B. RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: 1. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct; and 2. The Planning Commission hereby determines the Project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to the provisions of Article 19, Section 15301 (1) (2) (Demolition of a Single Family Residence) and 15303 (a) (Construction of a New Single Family Residence) of the CEQA Guidelines. Therefore, no further environmental review is required. C. FINDINGS OF FACT Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein and as prescribed under Diamond Bar Development Code (DBDC) Section 22.48, this Planning Commission hereby finds as follows: Development Review Findings (DBDC Section 22.48.040) 1. The design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with the applicable elements of the City's General Plan, City Design Guidelines, and development standards of the applicable district, design guidelines, and architectural criteria for special areas (e.g., theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards or planned developments); The design and layout of the proposed 7,432 square -foot single family residence, two garages totaling 1,968 square feet, and 1,302 square -foot indoor pool is consistent with the City's General Plan, City Design Guidelines and development standards by meeting all of the setbacks and requirements of the City's development code. The project site is not part of any theme area, specific plan, community plan, boulevard or planned development. 2. The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards; The proposed single-family residence will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments because the use of the project site is designed for a single-family home and the surrounding uses are also single-family homes. The proposed single-family home will not interfere with vehicular or pedestrian movements, such as access or other functional requirements of a single-family home because it complies with the requirements for driveway widths and grades. 3. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain and enhance the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22.48: Development Review Standards, the City's Design 2 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2011 -XX Guidelines, the City's General Plan, or any applicable specific plan; The new single-family home is designed to be compatible with the character of the eclectic neighborhoods in The Country Estates. It is designed in the Italian Revival style of architecture with earth -tone shades for the exterior finish to soften the building's visual impact and assist in preserving the hillside's aesthetic value. 4. The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, color, and will remain aesthetically appealing; The design of the new single-family home is an Italian Revival style of architecture. Variation in the building elements has been achieved through the utilization of varying architectural features, building materials, and landscaping. 5. The proposed development will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious (e.g., negative effect on property values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity; and Before the issuance of any City permits, the proposed project is required to comply with all conditions within the approved resolution, and the Building and Safety Division and Public Works Departments, and Los Angeles County Fire Department requirements. Through the permit and inspection process, the referenced agencies will ensure that the proposed project is not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. 6. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as set forth under Article 19 Section 15301 (1) (2) (Demolition of a Single Family Residence) and 15303 (a) (Construction of a New Single Family Residence) of the CEQA guidelines. Based upon the findings and conclusion set forth above, the Planning Commission hereby approves this Application subject to the following conditions: 1. Development shall substantially comply with the plans and documents presented to the Planning Commission at the public hearing; 2. Prior to building permit issuance, the required landscape plan shall be designed to meet the requirements of the Los Angeles County Fire Department's Fuel Modification Plan Guidelines in terms of plant selection, placement and maintenance. The final landscape and fuel modification plans shall be submitted to the Los Angeles Fire Department for review and 3 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2011 -XX approval; 3. Prior to building permit issuance, landscape and irrigation plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City's Consulting Landscape Architect; and 4. Standard Conditions. The applicant shall comply with the standard development conditions attached hereto. The Planning Commission shall: a. Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and b. Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail to the property owner, Hai Nguyen, 3057 Windmill Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765; and the applicant, Stewart Beck, 2915 Redhill Avenue, Suite G102, Costa Mesa, CA 92626. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12t' DAY OF APRIL 2011, BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. Jack Shah, Chairman I, Greg Gubman, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of April, 2011, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: ABSTAIN: Commissioners: ATTEST: Greg Gubman, Secretary 4 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2011 -XX COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT USE PERMITS, COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL NEW AND REMODELED STRUCTURES PROJECT #: Development Review No. PL 2010-289 SUBJECT: To demolish an existing residence and construct a new 7,432 square -foot single family residence two garages totaling 1,968 square feet and 1,302 square -foot indoor pool on a 1.88 gross acre lot. PROPERTY Hai Nguyen OWNER(S): 3057 Windmill Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 APPLICANT: Stewart Beck 2915 Redhill Avenue, Suite G102 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 LOCATION: 3010 Windmill Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION AT (909) 839-7030, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. In accordance with Government Code Section 66474.9(b)(1), the applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, and its officers, agents and employees, from any claim, action, or proceeding to attack, set-aside, void or annul, the approval of Development Review No. PL 2010-289 brought within the time period provided by Government Code Section 66499.37. In the event the city and/or its officers, agents and employees are made a party of any such action: (a) Applicant shall provide a defense to the City defendants or at the City's option reimburse the City its costs of defense, including reasonable attorneys fees, incurred in defense of such claims. 5 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2011 -XX (b) Applicant shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against the City defendants. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action of proceeding, and shall cooperate fully in the defense thereof. 2. This approval shall not be effective for any purpose until the applicant and owner of the property involved have filed, within twenty-one (21) days of approval of this Development Review No. PL 2010-289, at the City of Diamond Bar Community Development Department, their affidavit stating that they are aware of and agree to accept all the conditions of this approval. Further, this approval shall not be effective until the applicants pay remaining City processing fees, school fees and fees for the review of submitted reports. 3. All designers, architects, engineers, and contractors associated with this project shall obtain a Diamond Bar Business License; and a zoning approval forthose businesses located in Diamond Bar. 4. Signed copies of Planning Commission Resolution No. 2011 -XX, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 5. Prior to the plan check, revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval. 6. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval shall be completed. 7. The project site shall be maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of approval and all laws, or other applicable regulations. 8. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and any applicable Specific Plan in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 9. All site, grading, landscape/irrigation, and roof plans, and elevation plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of City permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.,) or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 10. The property owner/applicant shall remove the public hearing notice board within three days of this project's approval. 11. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of City Planning, Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works Department, and the Fire Department: 6 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2011 -XX B. FEES/DEPOSITS 1. Applicant shall pay development fees (including but not limited to Planning, Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works Department and Mitigation Monitoring) at the established rates, prior to issuance of building or grading permit (whichever comes first), as required by the City. School fees as required shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permit. In addition, the applicant shall pay all remaining prorated City project review and processing fees prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever comes first. 2. Prior to any plan check, all deposit accounts for the processing of this project shall have no deficits. C. TIME LIMITS 1. The approval of Development Review No. PL 2010-289 expires within two years from the date of approval if the use has not been exercised as defined per Municipal Code Section 22.66.050 (b)(1). The applicant may request in writing a one year time extension subject to Municipal Code Section 22.60.050(c) for Planning Commission approval. D. SITE DEVELOPMENT 1. The project site shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the approved plans submitted to, approved, and amended herein by the Planning Commission, collectively attached hereto as Attachment 2 including: site plans, floor plans, architectural elevations, and landscape plans on file with the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 2. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, air conditioning condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berms, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Division. 3. All roof -mounted equipment shall be screened from public view. 4. All structures, including walls, trash enclosures, canopies, etc., shall be maintained in a structurally sound, safe manner with a clean, orderly appearance. All graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours by the property owners/occupant. 5. All landscaping, structures, architectural features and public improvements damaged during construction shall be repaired or replaced upon project completion. 7 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2011 -XX E. SOLID WASTE 1. The site shall be maintained in a condition, which is free of debris both during and after the construction, addition, or implementation of the entitlement approved herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether during or subsequent to construction shall be done only by the property owner, applicant or by a duly permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste from residential, commercial, construction, and industrial areas within the City. It shall be the applicant's obligation to insure that the waste contractor used has obtained permits from the City of Diamond Bar to provide such services. 2. Mandatory solid waste disposal services shall be provided by the City franchised waste hauler to all parcels/lots or uses affected by approval of this project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, (909) 839-7040, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. GENERAL 1. An Erosion Control Plan shall be submitted concurrently with the grading plan clearly detailing erosion control measures. These measures shall be implemented during construction. The erosion control plan shall conform to national Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards and incorporate the appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP's) as specified in the Storm Water BMP Certification. For construction activity which. disturbs one acre or greater soil a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be needed. 2. The applicant shall comply with Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) requirements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 3. Grading and construction activities and the transportation of -equipment and materials and operation of heavy grading equipment shall be limited to between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. Dust generated by grading and construction activities shall be reduced by watering the soil prior to and during the activities and in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 402 and Rule 403. Reclaimed water shall be used whenever possible. Additionally, all construction equipment shall be properly muffled to reduce noise levels. B. SOILS REPORT/GRADING/RETAINING WALLS Prior to grading plan submittal, a geotechnical report prepared by a Geotechnical Engineer, licensed by the State of California, shall be submitted by the applicant for approval by the City. 8 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2011 -XX 2. Upon approval of the geotechnical report, the applicant shall submit drainage and grading plans prepared by a Civil Engineer, licensed by the State of California, prepared in accordance with the City's requirements for the City's review and approval. A list of requirements for grading plan check is available from the Public Works Department. All grading (cut and fill) calculations shall be submitted to the City concurrently with the grading plan. 3. Finished slopes shall conform to City Code Section 22.22.080 -Grading. 4. All easements and flood hazard areas shall be clearly identified on the grading plan. 5. The grading plan shall show the location of any retaining walls and the elevations of the top of wall/footing/retaining and the finished grade on both sides of the retaining wall. Construction details for retaining walls shall be shown on the grading plan. Calculations and details of retaining walls shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for review and approval. 6. All equipment staging areas shall be located on the project site. Staging area, including material stockpile and equipment storage area, shall be enclosed within a 6 foot -high chain link fence. All access points in the defense shall be locked whenever the construction site is not supervised. 7. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the California Building Code, City Grading Ordinance, Hillside Management Ordinance and acceptable grading practices. 8. The maximum grade of driveways serving building pad areas shall be 15 percent. In hillside areas driveway grades exceeding 15 percent shall have parking landings with a minimum 16 feet deep and shall not exceed five (5) percent grade or as required by the City Engineer. Driveways with a slope of 15 percent shall incorporate grooves for traction into the construction as required by the City Engineer. 9. All slopes shall be seeded per landscape plan and/or fuel modification plan with native grasses or planted with ground cover, shrubs, and trees for erosion control upon completion of grading or some other alternative method of erosion control shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and a permanent irrigation system shall be installed. 10. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a pre -construction meeting shall be held at the project site with the grading contractor, applicant, and city grading inspector at least 48 hours prior to commencing grading operations. 11. Rough grade certifications by project soils and civil engineers and the as - graded geotechnical report shall be submitted for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits for the foundation of the residential structure. Retaining wall permits may be issued without a rough grade certificate. 9 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2011 -XX 12. Final grade certifications by project soils and civil engineers shall be submitted to the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of any project final inspections/certificate of occupancy respectively. C. DRAINAGE 1. Detailed drainage system information of the lot with careful attention to any flood hazard area shall be submitted. All drainage/runoff from the development shall be conveyed from the site to the natural drainage course. No on-site drainage shall be conveyed to adjacent parcels, unless that is the natural drainage course. 2. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a hydrology and hydraulic study shall be prepared by a Civil Engineer registered in the State of California to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. D. UTILITIES 1. Applicant shall relocate and underground any existing on-site utilities to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the respective utility owner. 2. Underground utilities shall not be constructed within the drip line of any mature tree except as approved by a registered arborist. E. SEWERS/SEPTIC TANK 1. Applicant, at applicant's sole cost and expense, shall construct the sewer system in accordance with the City. Sewer plans shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Building and Safety Department. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 839- 7020, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Plans shall conform to State and Local Building Code (i.e., 2007 California Building Code, California Plumbing Code, California Mechanical Code, and California Electrical Code) requirements and all other applicable construction codes, ordinances and regulations in effect at the time of plan check submittal. 2. Application for which no permit is issued within 180 days following the date of application shall expire by limitatioh, and plans and other datasubmitted for review may thereafter be returned to the applicant or destroyed by the Building Department. 3. Every permit issued by the Building Department shall expire if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit. 10 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2011 -XX 4. Construction activities causing the operation of any tools or equipment used in construction, drilling, repair, alteration, or demolition work shall be conducted Mon. -Sat. between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. 5. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been met. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 6. The minimum design load for wind in this area is 85 M.P.H. exposures "C" and the site is within seismic category (D). The applicant shall submit drawings and calculations prepared by a California State licensed Architect/Engineer with wet stamp and signature. 7. This project shall comply with the 2008 Energy Code requirements of the State of California Energy Commission. Kitchen and bathroom lights shall be fluorescent. 8. In order to accurately monitor and report all construction and debris generation and diversion activities, all materials must both be hauled and processed by a city franchised contractor or by a licensed demolition contractor subject to compliance with specific permitting and reporting requirements. Southern California Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) approval/clearance will be required prior to the issuance of a demolition permit. Please contact AQMD at (909) 367-2327. 9. Prior to Building permit issuance, Walnut Valley School District fees must be paid. Please obtain a form from the Building & Safety Division to take directly to the school district. Walnut Valley School District 880 S. Lemon Ave Walnut, CA 19789 (909)595-1261 10. Submit Public Works Department approved grading plans showing clearly all finish elevations, drainage, and retaining walls locations. 11. "Separate permits are required for pools, spas, fountains, and retaining walls" and shall be noted on plans. 12. A height survey may be required at completion of framing. 13. Building setback from any slope (toe or top) shall meet Chapter 18 of the 2007 California Building Code. 14. Guardrails shall be designed for 20 load applied laterally at the top of the rail. 15. Indicate all easements on the site plan. 11 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2011 -XX 16. Please submit a total of 7 full set of plans including the grading for review to the Building & Safety Division after the plans have been approved by the Planning Division/Commission. 17. Fire Department approval shall be required. Contact the Fire Department to check the fire zone for the location of your property. If this project is located in Very High Hazard Fire Zone it shall meet of requirements of the fire zone. a. All unenclosed under -floor areas shall be constructed as exterior wall. b. All openings into the attic, floor and/or other enclosed areas shall be covered with corrosion -resistant wire mesh not less than 1/4 inch or more than 1/2 inch in any dimension except where such openings are equipped with sash or door. 18. All retaining walls shall be submitted to the Building & Safety and Public Work Departments for review and approval. 19. Submit grading plans showing clearly all finish elevations, drainage, and retaining wall locations. No building permits shall be issued prior to submitting a pad certification. 20. The project shall be protected by a construction fence and shall comply with the NPDES & BMP requirements (sand bags, etc.). 21. Check drainage patterns with Engineering Department. Surface water shall drain away from building at a 2% minimum slope. 22. Specify location of tempered glass as required by code. 23. Specify 1/4"/ft slope for all flat surfaces/ decks with approved water proofing. material. Also, provide guardrail connection detail (height, spacing, etc.). 24. Private property sewer/septic system shall be approved by the Los Angeles County Health Department and the California Water Control Board. End 12 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2011 -XX W CCD 0:e N ' r1� fit I ge as"=' �a E:aa „i Jk 3 ESSiS:i o Sddiddi m r-- ----- ---- l I I I I � I I I I I i I 3's I f I I I I I g I III ��yyf� i 8 k,i. 19 ` 6�d gg9e i � CD / r 9 /4 7 . m y! ®3' CCD L C d CSD vp CCD (n 3 Q n CD n C) CD 3i C CD G ,P � E � mp CD Y =3 m p Cft 3 Q CD 0 CD 91 fn I; E� iil �I =� 11 Mfr i A Irl i ; C CD G :Q g � d C �e C N a CD 7 O CD .�J m m m m m 0 N §} will y! ■ ) ) S in S e 3 \ S \ $'9az'Rz3 41tlaE a pQC �p zlglBE a! 9€I#Ip s l�wga @p !� pp €•€ y @y IVV p8 ;sf d8poA 9 pee .Ee�5369:a ®3C5�P y:p aIIaPElS�lC;id3p ai �$ ! ealll�l�Bi 11: ;aPl a !° 8t 6R6'@ E !y�€ g919 JIM, s,@ JH la€EE d !`" aC ! �!$�'I !s !�I i!$!B i ya C g F s z 3 i �l @ S iElp �" iClE!`g$iE; - ! F$'x!°33�i! :! a as i€! a1 [slEB F$�a# ee®ea00000000e � 11611,11jFMil d s a !➢s^ 91 I I C PSP 1q" N69t9'PoT a "� % � P 'p$ SIC ;ER p (SCF �� � �p��3 is p�Ig � Rti iFp6$! ! !1°R 413E 4 az HO ' E � 6 H11 .§R}33u 3.al 9x§5"• " �§-" 5 $kg3�a 3�5s�l# f F '�d E Ea�gE• Hz Ea R3{ iii 6- � u�i A w u � S 3�a�agpFgpa 9 m YAR ��y{5 p� A 4Z1 0 0 Y>i 9� 0 5 2G 1ANDSCAM ARGWIFLMPAL PLANS FOR �� �F£T �� I� I 1ANDSCAM ARGWIFLMPAL PLANS FOR �� �F£T �� FW ANp KIM NGUYEN LANDSCAPE APCHITECTO X[ J e6 0 3'JO WK-0NTRPN W.'WJiLM9RG9flG5 (949)39SB333 � • � � ! ( I _, w NOW—," KN �?��NGkrrEN X99 nZ�gyl 3„�YY' k§ _ �€ smu• Rig Pi'^” s iA as g 611=III € A Ci El Z•s3 M O6 i g 0 $ 3 m 14 Ut x m pyp�ggYd 6 ylA_y I 89 u � 5 d e� m r V m -_ LPNDSGME AR��FiffEGiURN-GffWS FOR HN PND YM NG N LANDSCAPE APCXITECTUflE s 0 30VJ WK NIFNNL�I.' WJ'V)N�bK U9+JflS 'hti944)3933333 ■ + � � I a WAGON TRAIN LN. r I LANDSCAPE ARGHrrE=Pk- PLANS FOR HAI AND KJM NGUYEN qw M4 �2 N pi pq m lit a WAGON TRAIN LN. r I LANDSCAPE ARGHrrE=Pk- PLANS FOR HAI AND KJM NGUYEN qw M4 �2 N pi pq m �J WATER CONSERVATION LANDSCAPING ORDINANCE CALCULATIONS ®Irl IM § 1H 1-0 U II1 awry � MIJ., T ZSLLI _ TRAIN LNA seo' VNDSCAPE ARCHRECNRAL PI 'WS FOR RN PND YJYI NOUYEN 3orowx.a+mwnw. ow -la oe+rtusn6s vn.pwC �3s. gBi itMM I gF tggat flI glji6f$gagg� e6y3 g ils4 a. .�¢66 ;�gg f !� fr([i$s el{; nG e.'m. a" }s { Y easy i Ya! ;apl,9 tl jig! aro§`'E = i 611 4 E �`i`j ' IN a..f.i{•,{ � * � �ly: � {€ . [6E• t{ {� � BL �F4 ! " It =ii ii s �� ;" t 5"4 fi Ssd?411{Pe IS€I€ 4alg i yq 's §11 Sfai �i • ` i ie �{;!= i � v' rq7 � WAGON TRAIN r i PLANSMP 1,1[ �' "PNDKIMNG N B@gta$ OHIO O ?rI. Ja91 giA333 4p 6$ {fiI r i PLANSMP 1,1[ �' "PNDKIMNG N O ?rI. Ja91 giA333 ! { P f e• A easel 9 Beat^.. Fp� pj � P� € � , $'4 . � �� $$ & € $k i$ $ 1� � 3 4 $ {�3 �� �• 1 � � ?� � � v � B " i 3 sx FFS "a"si Fai 4444 q gg $ia a$ i 4 ,i j di v p q 4 qi 9 Z W4 � i ia� �d+$$ a gg I[i9 ${v4 e¢ a€4F �34f $ d 49 3 3 e d 3 �� g�k�e ra x;; § § d g� 06� R z § ¢ a: � �e$ FSsfi�➢i al�,§f� x $ $�� �d� I y$fi$ $��4 pp$ • 5p��.�`.I�t $ $— � S'� ,�ezggguRt6a§ialI�.� 335��R�AA S �i �° �•6�$ ��� �� 3 �) ffi a4 gF du Y 4aF a § d � SR a _ �l P SY � i •$? S $ lit i $tit3 i� i�i,' it �$j� o ai Nil g Slei'# xl6 1 4 y$ p i Tm�n je$ tt1 iii ik 1ai LANOSCA^ ARgifTEGTU PLANS FOR'a.�' g;'a ._......,...,m. KNPND KH NGUYEN LAN OSC APE AR CHITEC'fOP.E ° S�iYAttFL4 �'YJWKTMTRAW W.' WKfYJ Ru$]fia PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT CITY OF DIAMOND BAR - 21825 COPLEY DRIVE - DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 - TEL. (909) 839-7030 - FAX (909) 861-3117 AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.3 MEETING DATE: April 12, 2011 CASE/FILE NUMBER: Conditional Use Permit No. PL 2010-355 PROJECT LOCATION: Public Right -of -Way on Diamond Bar Blvd. and 760 S. Diamond Bar Blvd (Los Angeles County Assessor's Parcel Number 8701-006-905) PROPERTY OWNER: City of Diamond Bar 21825 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 APPLICANT: Monica Moretta on behalf of T -Mobile Sequoia Deployment Services One Venture, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92618 Summary T -Mobile is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to replace an existing Edison -owned street light pole with a new street light pole designed to accommodate an attached micro -cellular antenna. The pole is located within the public right-of-way (ROW) on the east side of Diamond Bar Blvd—the second pole north of Tin Drive—and is designated by Southern California Edison (SCE) as a street light pole No. 422607E. Associated equipment is also proposed, which includes two ventilation stacks, two pedestals, and two underground vaults located on an adjacent City -owned parcel, and an electrical meter pedestal located across the street in the ROW. On August 17, 2010, the City Council approved a licensing agreement to allow T -Mobile to install, maintain and operate a wireless telecommunications facility at this location for $1,500.00 per month, contingent upon Planning Commission approval of a CUP. After evaluating the application, staff finds that the CUP complies with the City's development standards and meets the. findings required of the project. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve CUP No. PL 2010-355, subject to the conditions of approval contained in the attached resolution. Background The proposed street light pole is located within the public right-of-way along the east side of Diamond Bar Blvd, north of Tin Drive. The associated equipment is located at 760 S. Diamond Bar Blvd, a City -owned parcel as well as on the west side of Diamond Bar Blvd. in the public right-of-way. The subject site is zoned Low Density Residential (RL) with a consistent underlying General Plan land use designation of RL. The following cellular antennas located in the public right-of-way have been approved by the City: ApplicationDescription of Unit Address PW Encroachment Telephone Pole 3000 Block of Brea Canyon Rd AT&T Permit No. 02-2649 PP 2006-49 and Edison Street Light Pole 900 Block of Golden Springs T -Mobile PW Encroachment between High Knob and .Sunset Permit Crossing PP 2007-55 Street Light Pole Corner of Sylvan Glen and Sea Royal Street Green Communications PP 2008-38 Utility Pole Corner of Diamond Bar Blvd and NextG Networks Pathfinder Rd PP 2008-39 Utility Pole 2100 Block of Diamond Bar Blvd NextG Networks south of Kiowa Crest Dr PP 2008-40 Utility Pole 1600 Block of Diamond Bar Blvd NextG Networks north of Mountain Laurel Way PP 2008-41 Street Light Pole 800 Block of Diamond Bar Blvd NextG Networks south of Tin Dr PP 200842 Street Light Pole 1100 Block of Grand Ave north of NextG Networks Diamond Bar Blvd PP 2008-43 Edison Street Light Pole 2400 Block of Grand Ave across NextG Networks Rolling Knoll PP 2008-44 Utility Pole Corner of Diamond Bar Blvd and NextG Networks Golden Springs Dr All of the above installations were approved during the time when the prevailing case law determined that cities and counties could not require CUPs for telecommunications facilities within ROWs. On October 14, 2009, the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decided that the California Public Utilities Code does not prohibit cities and counties from regulating the aesthetics of cell sites proposed within the ROWs'. As a result, this and future requests to locate wireless telecommunications facilities in Diamond Bar's ROWs will be subject to Planning Commission approval through a CUP process. 1) Sprint PCS Assets LLC vs. City of Palos Verdes Estates (583.F.3d 716(2009)) Page 2 of 8 0ASTAFF REPORTS-I'MIAMOND BAR BLVD 760 -CUP- PL2010-355-APRIL 12 MMC Proiect Description The proposed wireless telecommunications facility, or "cell site," consists of the following components: • Removal of an existing 29'-6" octagonal concrete Edison -owned street light pole and replacement with a new 29'-6" round concrete street light pole with an attached micro -cellular antenna, which measures up to 36 feet to the top of the GPS antenna. Edison replacement street light poles that accommodate micro -cellular antennas are only manufactured in round shape. However the pole will be similar in color, texture, and material with the existing poles. • Installation of micro -cellular antenna mounted to the top of the street light pole. Two panels will be concealed within a 66" high cylindrical shroud (radome), painted to match the concrete street light pole located in the ROW; • Installation of two 34" high above ground ventilation stacks located on the adjacent city -owned parcel; ■ Installation of one 36" high and one 50" high above ground pedestals (enclosure for wiring) located on the adjacent city -owned parcel; ■ Installation of a 48' high electrical meter pedestal located across the street in the public rights-of-way; and • Two underground vaulted equipment radio cabinets located on an adjacent City - owned parcel. Staff reviewed the proposal with the City's Community Services Department. The associated equipment placed above ground is low -scale and relatively benign in appearance; therefore, staff does not believe that landscape screening of the pedestals and vent stacks is warranted for this project. In addition, there are no existing irrigation lines on the City -owned parcel. However, all associated equipment above ground is conditioned to be painted dark green to blend in with the surrounding vegetation. Page 3 of 8 WSTAFF REPORTS-MDIAMONO BAR BLVD 760- CUP- PL 2010 -355 -APRIL 12 11.000 Site and Surrounding General Plan, Zoning and Land Uses DesignationGeneral Plan ROW and Low Density ROW and RL Two Vents °°' O RHI. Pedestal t3 O siviwM,k'i°laamde l O RHI• Pedestal North Low/Medium Density �+ y Underground Residential Equipment Radio fix° y South Cabinet 3+ Single -Family V _ + Residences East I It j. RL iUnderground PlanningArea-2/Special Plan t ('+ Equipment Radio Electrical I Single -Family Myers Meter +- Cabinet Residences i gq i Street Light t mss k+y E 6 'x' ,pbb i 3A wnrww,d A a Site and Surrounding General Plan, Zoning and Land Uses Page 4 of 8 OASTAFF REPORTS-PC\DIAMOND BAR BLVD 760- CUP -PL 2016355 APRIL 12 11DOC DesignationGeneral Plan ROW and Low Density ROW and RL ROW and Open Site Residential Space Low Density Residential and Single Family North Low/Medium Density RL and RLM Residences Residential Open Space and South Low Density Residential RL Single -Family Residences East Low Density Residential and RL Single -Family PlanningArea-2/Special Plan Residences West Low/Medium Density RLM Single -Family Residential Residences Page 4 of 8 OASTAFF REPORTS-PC\DIAMOND BAR BLVD 760- CUP -PL 2016355 APRIL 12 11DOC ANALYSIS: Review Authority (Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Section 22.58) Planning Commission approval of a Conditional Use Permit is required for the establishment of a wireless telecommunications facility. Conditional Use Permit When reviewing a CUP application for a proposed telecommunications facility, consideration is given to the new location, design, configuration, and overall visual impact of the proposed structure. If it can be found that the proposed structure is likely to be compatible with its surroundings, the Commission may approve the proposed structure subject to conditions stipulating the manner in which the use must be Page 5 of 8 0.\STAFF REPORTS-PC\OIAMOND BAR BLVD 760- CUP- PL 2010-355- APRIL 1211 DOC conducted. The Commission also has the opportunity to remedy aesthetic impacts that the existing improvements may be imposing on the community. Coverage Features There is a coverage gap that extends along Diamond Bar Blvd between Sycamore Canyon Park and Lorbeer Middle School. Service to T -Mobile customers is affected by this coverage gap, which is why T -Mobile has proposed a cell site in the proposed location. By closing the existing coverage gap, the proposed telecommunications facility will improve coverage to all existing and future T -Mobile customers. Maps comparing coverage with and without the proposed cell site are provided in Attachment 4. Facilitv Operational Characteristics The proposed wireless telecommunications facility is unmanned and operates 24 hours a day, seven days a week, with routine maintenance visits. FCC Guidelines FCC documentation is required for this project and is a condition of approval. These types of telecommunications facility projects are generally categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because the FCC licensing process already incorporated an environmental finding for all telecommunications facilities to be developed under the wireless provider's FCC license. The Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 forbids local governments from denying or regulating wireless telecommunications facilities on the basis of health concerns. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) licenses and regulates wireless telecommunications facilities, and establishes safety thresholds for radio frequency (RF) emissions. Because wireless telecommunications facilities are regulated by the FCC, local agencies are preempted considering perceived health effects in land use decisions for such facilities. Compatibility with Neighborhood The proposed project complies with the goals and objectives as set forth in the adopted General Plan in terms of land use. The project will not negatively affect the existing surrounding land uses, and the design and appearance of the proposed structure is compatible with the surrounding area for the following reasons: The new pole will be similar in color, texture and material with existing street light poles; ® The proposed antenna will have a minimal visual impact since it will be concealed inside a radome and painted to match the street light pole; The proposed antenna will be approximately 157 feet away frorn the nearest Page 6 of 8 0:\STAFF REPORTS-I'DUAwONO BAR BLVD 760-CUP-PL2010-355-APRIL 1211.000 residences; and • There are ten existing micro -cellular antennas of similar design located in the public rights-of-way within the City, which are visually benign (See Attachment 5: Updated City's Telecommunications Facilities and Opportunities Map for location of cell sites). Based on all of the factors listed above, the proposed facility is an appropriate solution to allow T -Mobile to install a micro -cellular antenna in the public Rights -of -Way and associated equipment on a City -owned parcel. Additional Review The Public Works Department and Building and Safety Division reviewed this project and included their comments in the attached resolution as conditions of approval. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: On April 1, 2011, public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 500 - foot radius of the project site and the notice was published in the Inland Valley Daily Tribune and San Gabriel Valley Tribune newspapers. A notice display board was posted at the site, and a copy of the notice was posted at the City's three designated community posting sites. Public Comments Received At the time the staff report was published, staff had not received any comments from the public. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: This project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on that assessment, the City has determined the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to the provisions of Article 19 Section 15303 (New Construction of Small Structure) of the CEQA Guidelines. No further environmental review is required. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution approving Conditional Use Permit No. PL 2010-355, to allow the replacement of SCE Streetlight Pole No. 422607E with a new 29'-6" street light pole with an attached micro - cellular antenna, which measures up to 36 feet to the top of the GPS antenna and associated equipment, based on the findings of DBMC Section 22.58, subject to conditions of approval as listed within the draft resolution. Page 7 of 8 0:15TAFF REPORTS-PCOIAMONO BAR BLVD 760 -CUP- PL 2010 -355 -APRIL 1211.Doc Prepared by: David ATvarez Assistant Plann r Attachments: Reviewed by: Grace S. Lee Senior Planner 1. Draft Resolution No. 2011 -XX and Conditions of Approval 2. Architectural Plans 3. Photo Simulations 4. Propagation Maps 5. City's Telecommunications Facilities and Opportunities Map WSTAFF REPORTS-PC\DIAMOND BAR BLVD 760- CUP- PL 2010 -355 -APRIL 12 11. DOC n-itachmeni 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -XX A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. PL 2010-355, TO REMOVE AN EXISTING EDISON-OWNED STREET LIGHT POLE AND REPLACE WITH A NEW 29'-6" HIGH STREET LIGHT POLE WITH ATTACHED MICRO - CELLULAR ANTENNA, WHICH MEASURES UP TO 36 FEET TO THE TOP OF THE GPS ANTENNA ALONG WITH ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT. THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY ON DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT IS LOCATED ACROSS THE STREET IN THE PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND ON A CITY -OWNED PARCEL AT 760 S. DIAMOND BAR BLVD (APN: 8701-006-905). A. RECITALS 1. Applicant, T -Mobile, have filed an application for Conditional Use Permit No. PL 2010-355 to remove an existing Edison -owned street light pole and replace with a new 29-6" street light pole with a micro -cellular antenna, which measures up to 36 feet to the top of the GPS antenna. The subject site is located within the public rights-of-way on Diamond Bar Blvd. and the associated equipment is located across the street in the public rights-of-way and at 760 S. Diamond Bar Blvd, City of Diamond Bar, County of Los Angeles, California. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit and Development Review shall collectively be referred to as the "Project." 2. The subject property is located in the public rights-of-way on Diamond Bar Blvd. and is also located on a parcel totaling 1,365,606 square feet (31.35 acres) at 760 S. Diamond Bar Boulevard. It is located in the Low Density Residential (RL) zone with an underlying General Plan land use designation of RL. 3. The legal description of the subject property is Tract 31479. The Assessor's Parcel Number (APN) is 8701-006-905. 4. On April 1, 2011, notification of the public hearing for this project was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers. Public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 500 -foot radius of the Project site and public notices were posted at the City's designated community posting sites. In addition to the published and mailed notices, the project site was posted with a display board. 5. On April 12, 2011, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing, solicited testimony from all interested individuals, and concluded said hearing on that date. B. RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved bythe Planning.Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct; 2. The Planning Commission hereby determines the Project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to the provisions of Article 19, Section 15303 (new construction of small structure) of the CEQA Guidelines. Therefore, no further environmental review is required. C. FINDINGS OF FACT Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein and as prescribed under Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Section 22.58, this Planning Commission hereby finds as follows: Conditional Use Permit Findings (DBMC Section 22.58) The proposed use is allowed within the subject zoning district with the approval of a conditional use permit and complies with all other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code; Pursuant to DBMC Section 22.08.030 Table 2-3, wireless telecommunications facilities are allowed in the ROW and RL zoning district. Additionally, micro - cellular antennas attached to a street light pole comply with factors considered in approving wireless telecommunications antenna facilities pursuant to DBMC Section 22.42.130 (G.6.F.2). 2. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan; The General Plan land use designation is Low Density Residential (RL). The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Goal2, Strategy 2.2.1: "Require that new development be compatible with surrounding land uses," and Strategy 2.2.3: "Where land uses of significantly different intensity or use are planned adjacent to each other, ensure that individual site designs and operations are managed in such a manner as to avoid the creation of nuisances and hazards." The proposed facility meets Strategy 2.2.1 since the structure is an unmanned telecommunications facility camouflaged into a street light pole. The proposed facility meets Strategy 2.2.3 because it will not create a new source of light and noise, and will generate a very minimal amount of traffic by infrequent maintenance visits. The antennas will be affixed to the street light in a cylindrical shroud (radome) painted to match the color of the street light pole. In addition, the associated above ground equipment will be painted dark green to match the existing surrounding vegetation. Therefore, the proposed facility will have no adverse effects on the surrounding neighborhood. 2 CUP No. PL 2010355 The site is not subject to the provisions of any specific plan. 3. The design, location, size and operating characteristics of the proposed use are compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity; An existing Edison -owned street light pole is to be removed and replaced with a new 29'-6" street light pole with an attached micro -cellular antenna, which measures up to 36 feet to the top of the GPS antenna in the public rights-of-way along Diamond Bar Blvd. The associated ground equipments will be located across the street in the public rights-of-way and on a City -owned parcel and shall be painted dark green to blend in with surrounding vegetation. There are ten existing cellular antennas of similar design located in the public rights-of-way within the City. The proposed facility is unmanned and is subject to routine maintenance. As such, the operational characteristics are compatible with other public utility and infrastructure facilities. 4. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and densitylintensity of use being proposed including access, provision of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and the absence of physical constraints; The subject site is physically suitable because the existing 29'-6" octagonal concrete street light pole is being replaced with a new similar 29'--6" round concrete street light pole. The associated ground -mounted equipment will be located in the adjacent City -owned parcel, which will not interfere with pedestrian access and is visually non obtrusive. 5. Granting the conditional use permit will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, and zoning district in which the property is located; and Before the issuance of any City permits, the proposed project is required to comply with all conditions within the approved resolution, and the Building and Safety Division and Public Works Departments, and Los Angeles County Fire Department requirements. The referenced agencies through the permit and inspection process will ensure that the proposed project is not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. 6. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as set forth under Article 19 Section 15303 (new construction of small structure) of the CEQA Guidelines. 3 CUP No. PL 2010-355 Wireless Facilities (DBMC Section 22.42.130) Environmental integration. To the extent which the proposed facility blends into the surrounding environment and is architecturally integrated into a concealing structure, taking into consideration alternative sites that are available. The project integrates the antennas onto a street light pole to blend in with the existing street light poles within the vicinity. The proposed design for the site is the least intrusive on the community values since it is within a radome, installed onto a street light pole as prescribed by the General Plan and Diamond Bar Development Code (DBDC) Section 22.42.130 (G.6.F.2). 2. Screening: To the extent which the proposed facility is screened or camouflaged by existing or proposed topography, vegetation, buildings or other structures. Camouflaging is provided by attaching the antenna to a street light pole to match the existing street light poles. The associated equipment above ground shall be painted dark green to blend in with the surrounding vegetation. Size. The total size of the proposed facility, particularly in relation to surrounding and supporting structures. The proposed removal of an Edison -owned street light pole and replacement with a similarstreet light pole with an attached micro -cellular antenna is appropriate in size and scale to the context, setting and similar to existing street light poles. The proposed associated equipments are conditioned_ to be painted dark green to blend in with the surrounding vegetation. 4. Residential proximity. Proximity of the proposed facility to residential structures and to the boundaries of residential districts. The proposed wireless telecommunications facility is approximately 157 feet from the nearest residences, and is located within the Low Density Residential zone. Access. Proposed ingress to and egress from the site of the proposed facility. Access to the proposed project is situated on Diamond BarBoulevard north of Tin Drive 6. Location. The location of the proposed facility and the extent to which it conforms to the following in order of preferences — co -location or located at a pre -approved location, attached to existing structure such as building, communication tower, church steeple or utility pole or tower, and located in industrial, business park or commercial zoning districts. As previously mentioned, the proposed micro -cellular antenna will be affixed to a street light pole and complies with factors considered in approving a wireless telecommunications antenna pursuant to DBDC Section 22.42.130 (G.6.F.2). 4 CUP No. PL 2010-355 There is a coverage gap that extends along Diamond Bar Blvd between Sycamore Canyon Park and Lorbeer Middle School. Service to T -Mobile customers is affected by this coverage gap, which is why T -Mobile has proposed a cell site in the proposed location. By closing the existing coverage gap, the proposed telecommunications facility will improve coverage to all existing and future T - Mobile customers. Maps comparing coverage with and without the proposed cell site are provided in Attachment 4. D. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Based on the findings and conclusions set forth above, the Planning Commission hereby approves the proposed project subject to the following. conditions and the attached standard conditions: All antennas, structural components and other apparatus attached to the street light pole shall be painted and maintained to match the concrete pole and shall be a noncorrosive nonmetallic finish that is conducive to reflection or glare. 2. The proposed associated equipments shall be painted dark green to blend in with the existing vegetation. 3. The project shall substantially conform to Title Sheet, Site Plan, Antenna and Layout Plan, Elevations, Landscape Plan, and Details as submitted to, amended herein, and approved by the Planning Commission. 4. Applicant shall comply with all Federal, State and City regulations. 5. To ensure compliance with all conditions of approval and applicable codes, the Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to period review. If non-compliance with conditions of approval occurs, the Planning Commission may review the Conditional Use Permit. The Commission may revoke or modify the Conditional Use Permit. 6. When an emergency generator is used on site, the noise level of the generator shall comply with the City's noise standards in Development Code Chapter 22.28. 7. Signs and advertising shall be prohibited on the antenna array. No lighting shall be installed on the wireless antennas or associated equipment. 9. The site shall be maintained in a condition free of trash, debris, refuse, and undesirable vegetation. All graffiti must be removed within 24 hours. In the event that the applicant does not remove all graffiti from the said structure, the city will remove all graffiti and shall be reimbursed for all expenses. 10. In the event that the antenna becomes inoperable or ceases to be used for a period of six consecutive months, the applicant shall remove the telecommunications facility within 90 -days of notification by the City. CUP No. PL 2010-355 11. All cables and wiring for the telecommunications facility shall be underground. 12. Prior to submitting for building plan check, submit detailed engineering calculations for foundation and wind loads, plus documentation that the electromagnetic fields (EMFs) from the proposed wireless telecommunications antenna facility will be within the limits approved by the FCC. The Planning Commission shall: (a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and (b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail to: RLS, Attention: Monica Moretta, Sequoia Deployment Services, One Venture, Suite 200, Irvine, CA 92618; Linda Paul, T -Mobile, 3257 E. Guasti Road, Suite 200, Ontario, CA 91761. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12th DAY OF APRIL 2011, BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. Iffli Jack Shah, Chairman I, Greg Gubman, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted bythe Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of April 2011, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners: None NOES: Commissioners: None ABSTAIN: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: None ATTEST: Greg Gubman, AICP Community Development Director 6 CUP No, PL 2010-355 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS USE PERMITS, COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL NEW AND REMODELED STRUCTURES PROJECT #: Conditional Use Permit No. PL 2010-355 SUBJECT: Remove an existing Edison -owned street light pole and replace with a similar street light pole with an attached micro -cellular antenna. APPLICANT: T -Mobile LOCATION: Public ROW on Diamond Bar Blvd. and 760 S. Diamond Bar Blvd Diamond Bar, CA 91765 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION AT (909) 839-7030, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS In accordance with Government Code Section 66474.9(b) (1), the applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, and its officers, agents and employees, from any claim, action, or proceeding to attack, set-aside, void or annul, the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. PL 2010-355 broughtwithin the time period provided by Government Code Section 66499.37. In the eventthe city and/or its officers, agents and employees are made a party of any such action: (a) Applicant shall provide a defense to the City defendants or at the City's option reimburse the City its costs of defense, including reasonable attorneys fees, incurred in defense of such claims. (b) Applicant shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against the City defendants. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action of proceeding, and shall cooperate fully in the defense thereof. This approval shall not be effective for any purpose until the applicant and owner of the property involved have filed, within twenty-one (21) days of approval of this Conditional Use Permit No. PL 2010-355, at the City of Diamond Bar Community CUP No. PL 2010-355 Development Department, their affidavit stating that they are aware of and agree to accept all the conditions of this approval. Further, this approval shall not be effective until the applicants pay remaining City processing fees, school fees and fees for the review of submitted reports. 3. All designers, architects, engineers, and contractors associated with this project shall obtain a Diamond Bar Business License and zoning approval for those businesses located in Diamond Bar. 4. Signed copies of the Planning Commission Resolution No. 2011 -XX, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 5. Priorto the plan check, revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval. 6. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval shall be completed. 7. The project site shall be maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of approval and all laws, or other applicable regulations. 8. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and any applicable Specific Plan in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 9. All site, grading, and elevation plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of City permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.,) or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 10. Applicant shall remove the public hearing notice board within three days of this project's approval. 11. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of City Planning, Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works Department, and the Fire Department. B. FEES/DEPOSITS Applicant shall pay development fees (including but not limited to Planning, Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works Department and Mitigation Monitoring) at the established rates, prior to issuance of building or grading permit (whichever comes first), as required by the City. School fees as required shall be paid priorto the issuance of building permit. In addition, the applicant shall pay all remaining prorated City project review and processing fees prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever come first. 2. Priorto any plan check, all deposit accounts forthe processing of this project shall CUP No. PL 2010-355 have no deficits. C. TIME LIMITS 1. The approval of Conditional Use Permit No. PL 2010-355 shall expire within two years from the date of approval if the use has not been exercised as defined in accordance to Municipal Code Section 22.66.050 (b)(1). The applicant may request in writing a one year time extension subject to Municipal Code Section 22.60.050(c) for Planning Commission approval. D. SITE DEVELOPMENT 1. The project site shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the approved plans submitted to, approved, and amended herein by the Planning Commission, collectively labeled and referenced herein as Exhibit "A" including: site plans, floor plans, architectural elevations, and landscape plans on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein and Development Code regulations. 2. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, air conditioning condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berms, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Division. 3. All structures, including walls, shall be maintained in a structurally sound, safe manner with a clean, orderly appearance. All graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours by the property owner/occupant. F. SOLID WASTE 1. The site shall be maintained in a condition, which is free of debris both during and after the construction, addition, or implementation of the entitlement approved herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether during or subsequent to construction shall be done only by the property owner, applicant or by a duly permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste from residential, commercial, construction, and industrial areas within the City. It shall be the applicant's obligation to insure that the waste contractor used has obtained permits from the City of Diamond Bar to provide such services. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, (909) 839-7040, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. GENERAL 1. An Erosion Control Plan shall be submitted concurrently with the grading plan clearly detailing erosion control measures. These measures shall be implemented during construction. The erosion control plan shall conform to national Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards and incorporate the appropriate 9 CUP No. PL 2010-355 Best Management Practices (BMP's) as specified in the Storm Water BMP Certification. 2. Construction activities and the transportation of equipment and materials and operation of heavy grading equipment shall be limited to between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. Dust generated by grading and construction activities shall be reduced by watering the soil prior to and during the activities and in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 402 and Rule 403. Reclaimed water shall be used whenever possible. Additionally, all construction equipment shall be properly muffled to reduce noise levels. B. SOILS REPORT/GRADING/RETAINING WALLS All equipment staging areas shall be located on the project site. Staging area, including material stockpile and equipment area will not be permitted within the public rights-of-way. C. OFF-SITE STREET IMPROVEMENTS All work within the public rights-of-way will require a separate permit from the Public Works Department. All applicable fees shall be paid. Additional permit conditions may be imposed upon submittal of permit application. A traffic control plan, signed and stamped by a registered engineer in the state of California, shall be submitted concurrently with the permit application. 3. All work within the public rights-of-way shall maintain Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliance. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 839-7020, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Plans shall conform to State and Local Building Code (i.e., 2007 California Building Code, California Plumbing Code, California Mechanical Code, and the California Electrical Code) requirements and all other applicable construction codes, ordinances and regulations in effect at the time of plan check submittal. 2. The minimum design load forwind in this area. is 95 M.P.H. exposures "C" and the site is within seismic zone four (4). The applicant shall submit drawings and calculations prepared by a California State licensed Architect/Engineer with wet stamp and signature. 3. This project shall comply with the energy conservation requirements of the State of California Energy Commission. All lighting shall be high efficacy or equivalent per the current California Energy Code. 4. Shoring shall be maintained for any open trenches in conformance to OSHA standards. 10 CUP No. PL 2010-355 5. Protection of trenches shall be maintained at all times. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE PREVENTION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:: 1. Emergency access shall be provided, maintaining free and clear, a minimum 28 foot at all times during construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. 2. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be submitted to the Fire Department that temporary water supply for fire protection is available pending completion of the required fire protection system. 3. All required fire hydrants shall be installed and tested and accepted prior to construction. Vehicular access must be provided and maintained serviceable throughout construction. END 11 CUP No. PL 2010355 c ,. �', „, 5 .H. � 5R pm8e� 3� fg=oxggI'. " 3 Sod 9E€.� x n"ss F �In 'M o w mg - iaIA $� X.4 £ m IF r[I1 ry n m M yy Li xr ors M^. k L W C ^ In Yr C'apb n kPk •` I' s y d 3�r 4'wrlJ,ye �u`p s/�x.��ervn ai 4a.c aa�a '-M IrO:xl Wr xlxl CY (� \' Wr• ueaomn -ArMW�c`7 'tl<9 v rf' =I a N 4 P $'�,�rnry� -i I SS - o e .'= x TS Ln'V+" a cm C ORE �U CO "s = e E( 8a(' °YCmprvn � Vrl. _6 o s 9 � n6? i+fit iyx ^si ep � ti c "yi,i'LY� n�a^d,n v rf' =I a N 4 P $'�,�rnry� -i I SS - o e .'= x TS Ln'V+" a cm C ORE �U CO "s = e E( 8a(' r REliY 4 __ — ,• � < $w om 5` a f o 4111 A^ > `$Rs¢sta �, � "zss€Pc% � 'R= 3:s aEi eo _ s as s 01 Ig ^]EA R^ a ��&^"��� P"@ s`,^tea r P all a ll y p°#9ms riR?c � 6a#' 1 11 sad, R$ -• !$ a ar- c 0 a "ag^ gq r m€eg _ a°a a a: _ 3 x ^es.#d£�a "ax �^xisp� ax$ e." ax� �at�"8€? pp Rc MOM F 'A fII �Rd » R ,, ss SET'� �5€"s g s=%g wa ; #. o f -" a"= €e3 .€sgxa�' R$s � loll 3e aA $a # irs a 3€ ip M 60^ s •ag ag sRRs$sy^ -a'p 5g�€F#� s�m"^ � s£ , 1 a; i �fg5".%s�az^"ase5sse.. s^$$aaoS^ 101i l: ^ plug IM! 1001asMig$ ill; '$c^^ a RUN gse R Y3 a B F. P .�g^ g"EFs to h Oviz^ 11M O $! MITmJl_t: 91 $ad 1.Ba� o wmo I ^ $^P^ ma3 ^s a £ �ti�nOOZ=_ s c^a' - on E P PY 3€ ^ _$ R� S € �$$ c"% MIX no a3Pgai ¢$ E a^ ^" '�$ i a$. '3"5 " %.a `^�. e#Sff gg' m51a'pR ^ a n % z &$ a %a ,s ss'R iRg P� %n Ro 11 -• Ss a $'n SUM $4� €n � _ "�aE= 'a I' ^ a€s° qn, a'^ $ A @ _ "" % s 8m v%$P his R � €_ "as" a 7 g x: ss a s" % s € €a"€ 4.y, ^53 a H{ �a `a» ^S $a I i �" ° ° 5'i^ MI 1 5' a � u MM ggo i Raak` � � n �?9°$ Rpdq g#a 0 3§ i � �% a a s� s� '.� a m� a 111 e N Sol f4 = U '�a5 a= ; a f" ES' �$ .aR R a� }}d ea M IS i 9 ism ig$ 11 us 21 s ^ sis a' a#ma a _a : 9 in, $F ' � �� a a=; e.d ^�a' & �aa:� $ 1%.-a 5 1 3g Nil% x.P €"RR 9s -�a $ g g 3' INA � ?oas 8,^g $-oga a g a.i s§ aE� 3€e. o £i e5€ao3.i� n . rids; a` A.R ^_' ; .,e€a? %° iE, ua ¢¢^ a'j a >" sa. €9y xo P, N � e=� Ps [^€�% a'� � a€� �s°" s£ s xeF� $���%cg` 3y aEtl ��� Rd E� $� �y3 ��as � R3�a�a" NUNN .. ` z $ c$ e g ms% a3$R s.$ ¢`5 as^= °^ P a mull 6g, I ,: s' Rei $y 1E SRI; �� F E $x 1 S n sd3� ��g ^� - "ss�Ns �aP,' oa�a 8 # a:aO @ d° sad 1 logo uO c"n 1 u�� �$ ��a� y�5a 2g $: � x ap Rds as �€a��i� �� sFs $E° ea$ ' 9?5 ^3%n3 E '� 9F Y a eg �. #��'�iR i1sa e. l N�"%j, M ;U m ;:'a� o RIo a Y= intni70.Js' = n IYYFwJJ a 3 E�-- 4CA a V f a s m a C Z p 621'"s g3 'a o 2 �s C i wp �, �'yO.+ E Eel z sMPa g s`W' € 2 0 A 11 h g a`w V r ® o "s a9 35a X57 "93 �4 I "Y' 2e nm 3 �. Z N C ag x. Y a' q CDD $ . ®. s 4 ®. { b o ®. �.. I � sZsa M�0a2aaEarpw R�asES=.sg�gaaaf"aRg`¢9isgx I • y� z : s s351 9.'R-yg asA ase teff :5 R F k fi t e I�w_,�� l %l M1, BRA82>A'0. 31ig1 I I 0; 1 om /r I/�Jp� 83_e8I I oy, I�—y'cQ-Y11 I z 1 F;;� � ° j —�` E�a/ ,�'•_.e °�Py w-� a`� t— 1 A BL Fa- Ls^�� O6 l N O rA'Ri \' i/ y J JN ON WnB o•� 9 mm \ it d '\, / m OF z _____, Kb o I a T c 9 8� D1410N0 AR aL Io- a e 44 I � F.LW� I §2Ena f mng 2a ° ;ism ao� ; 1�� h M .. I. D§ gS u 9 g s € s L Ep Ug APs€� Edo 34! G 4C.^v P' sa oy4„ A gB Ing n TOPQGftAPFIIC SURVEY T • •Mobile i,wo suxvfnxs s Mnrrwc IE25952.A -DIA END BAR TIN LIGHT POLE 4422606E"' v ? DIAMDND BAR BLVD-. NORTH DF TIN DRIVE, EAST SIDE Together S DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 - — - yStiCle ] %��� _ \\��\�m' k� m§� VIA, \ \ /I k� K a"a o r� A SIT is r t I( O'Y 0/4MOhh B4 cURB"CF ry� I`�/ V II nz,MVM u, E a � C $ f 2 T q 9 F u q o N d p. Jnr o B 3 e f �o� or N S �g to Ul ga oo� _ c= Er a '� 00 3 �' L w 9e6 3�eR^ ifi d 41 nq Is i & "g � � N -.1 m o seacptz vn _ Z g a��i Z 82 a 8 ZD D p 5033a50M r F O O €6 �g a A —Dzi ids z 2 O o ddd 3 r e e ¢.tee^ r d A p.�0 P P2 £ .-p dad" p Pe e n d d P O ¢ es € O O P e m carni s e �" ------------- Ln a cn B ' )K§ _ )\k k § �k - � § / ') `� \ } ) �§ 9 £�[. �)x // §§ �- \\\ §®»f® `� - » )\\ > // � \ ( »� ) ) 27M it �. I� ] }[K(a;)\/ m m§ )�i$� \�) k(D F.° C Ci11 n � _ .P gpi a -iu A nY _L y wH =F7 Fg 5 BSd• 9{9{s 3Sp :�5 7 q 0 Z@ [1aE ..g�g�$ Ci11 n � _ .P gpi a -iu A nY _L agag! Fg 5 BSd• 9{9{s 3Sp :�5 7 q 0 Z@ [1aE ..g�g�$ 'qav- s _ 9 E€[jpP own m v aFE'k E" Ea4 �o pi P, y`� Fa it py Ag€n a r pF 7 0 �9x o0 _ 9 own m v �o $� m py Ag€n r ago rwrec e• N p -0c. €g T2 72 X a. o W FD s - n3N n _ O (I Q u a I 1p "` z ®am -n® I s 4 e" e0. - 4 ?®WW p O M+ � g W� N NAM- O N - ''€ m z amgF MA a-_ oia o B �Q Q u a I 1p "` z ®am -n® I s 4 e" e0. - 4 ?®WW p O M+ � g W� N NAM- O N - z amgF MA a-_ oia o Q u a I 1p "` z ®am -n® I s 4 e" e0. - 4 ?®WW p O M+ � g W� N NAM- B7 q : 6 —sigi �°Gi��uk��§f+•G�o'�� sav vee s Vis. E; § \ § !6m�43 ]] [ } m| \\\\jl•q% \©,�\U ! ~* \ %!4Ln © ! 7 a,Ln yl ®Rj)IT G� ch 412 av yyY T�® OI RD`S a� Yh T{ p W C O N LO 0) Ln N W_ d w in N O CLO L IL d t W Y 3 d ai L U 'a d v ID IL m Z; ;b, � 1 , �. CITY OF MAMO D BAR 6icccrnrnun�cadons Faciilfies and Opportunities Map L...._) CITY BOUNDARY Q CHURCH PROPERTY OTHER PUBLIC PROPERTY PUBLIC PARKS PUBLIC SCHOOLS WVWD WATER RESERVOIR J EXISTING FACILITIES R -O -W FACILITIES 0 1 2 Miles SEE BACK FOR CELL SITE DETAILS AND LOCATIONS D N 0 3 D cn IU it �i llG/A IY'Y111���. CITY OF MAMO D BAR 6icccrnrnun�cadons Faciilfies and Opportunities Map L...._) CITY BOUNDARY Q CHURCH PROPERTY OTHER PUBLIC PROPERTY PUBLIC PARKS PUBLIC SCHOOLS WVWD WATER RESERVOIR J EXISTING FACILITIES R -O -W FACILITIES 0 1 2 Miles SEE BACK FOR CELL SITE DETAILS AND LOCATIONS D N 0 3 D cn fi'ii6nnrannd Roy Q' PH Sites a Planning/ Applicatlorr No.Descri ptionbfUnit 4dressNo. Street Name Carrier CUP 90-109 Bldg Roof 27_Firectors Rd ATBS CUP 92-0911)/ DR 97-03 Bld Roaf 23555Golden Springs Dr erizon Light Pole 21490 Pathfinder Rd SMR CUP 92-11 _ Bid Roof 21400 Pathfinder Rd Verizon -CUP CUP 94-06 Ljtht Pale 21400 Pathfinder Rd T&T 'ADR 9407 Bld Roof 21725Gatewa Center Dr AT&T 94-15(1) - 0' Monopole 21450 Golden S on s Dr Verizon - ,CUP 95-03 AM Bldg Roof 1200 Diamond Bar Blvd Verizon j: 95-24 CUP 96-04 Stealth Clock Tower 21308 Path facer Rd AT&T u CUP 96-10 2/ DR 96-09(2) 3 Monopoles 24401 Darrin Dr -Mobile 8 S rinUNeMeI 9611/DR 96-10 Bid Roof 275Pmspectors Rd Cmc .CUP 96-121 DR 96-11 Bltl Roof 21400 Pathfinder Rd Cmc .CUP CUP 96'13/ DR 96-13 Bldg Roof 33338rea Can go RdAT&T CUP 96-15/ DR 96-14 50' Mona ole 21450Golden Springs Dr Cox DR 96-14 Bldj Roof 1200Diamond Bar Blvd -Mobile i ADR 96-19 Bldg Tower 259Gentle Springs Ln -Mobile ADR 96-26 Bldg Roof 21725Gatewa Center Dr S rint/Nextel SSff CUP 06-011 DR 06-01/ PP 02-47/ PP D4 241425 Ivan Glen Rd T&T/Metro PCS 777777 ; 141 CUP 97-02! DR 97-06 Li of Pole ^r° ADR 97-08 Bldg Roof 21725 Gatewa Center Dr Pa eNet - o ' PP 99-14 Bld Roof 23383Golden 5 rin s Or 5 tint/Nextel PP 01-54/ PP 00149/ PP 99-15 Bldg Roof 1200 Diamond Bar Blvd S rinUNextel PP 99-59 Vater Tank _ 24495 East ate Dr T -Mobile c CUP 00-04/ DR o0 -1D 2 Monopoles 24401 Darrin Dr SprinUNexlel Vf ¢s' CUP 01-03/ DR 01-13 Stealth Bld Tower 21951 Golden S rin s Or AT6T pP 01-55 Roof - 20530 Earl ate St -Mobile fp _Bltl PWs Encroachment Permit No. 02-2649 Telephone Pole ROW- 3000 Block of Brea Can on Rd AT&T � ;CUP D2-031 DR 02-12 2 Mona Elms 24401 Darrin Dr erimn CUP 02-04 3ldg Roof 21725 Gateway Center Dr Sk Tel • ^ CLIP 02-071 VAR 02-021 DR 02-1B 0' Mono C rens 2151 Diamond Bar Blvd AT&T i CUP 03-03/ DR 03-131 MV 03-07 38' Mono Elm 24500East ate Dr S rinUNextel Ic` . PP 03-56 3 �d Roof 21144Golden S rin s Dr AT&T - c^r' 'CUP 05-02/ DR 05-15/ MV 05-03 38Mona Elm 24495East ate Or AT&T c' •CUP 05-04/ DR 05-315/ MV 05-03 Bldg Roof 1155Diamond Bar Blvd AT&T DR 05-38 Stealth Bldg Tower 2707Diamond Bar Blvd T -Mobile CUP 05-08/ VAR 06-03/ DR 05-40 5' Mono Elm 1600 Grand Ave Verizon <.: CUP D6-03/ VAR 06-051 DR 06-21 451 Mono Elm 1600Grand Ave S rinUNmdel 9 CUP 06-031 DR 06-16 Collocate on Mono Elm 1600 Grand Ave T -Mobile PP 06-49 & PVVs encroachment permit in ROW- 900 Block of Golden Springs. Dr between Edison Pole High Knob and Sunset Crossln T -Mobile 1 - Royal Street Communica- CUP 06-06/ DR 06-10 Stealth in parapet 275 Prospectors Rd tions Royal Street Communica- '-o CUP O6-07/DR 06-20 81d Roof 21725Gateway Center Dr tions - Royal Street Communica- CUP 06-16/ DR 06-36 Li ht Pole 241425 Ivan Glen Rd - tions Royal Street Communica- 1 CUP Ofi-17 Light Pole 21400Pathfinder Rd tions - — Royal Street Communica- �ti.•'c''CUP07-02 Li ht Pole 738Pantera Dr tions CUP D7-16 Light Pole 73813antera Dr -Mobile - Royal Street Communica- PP 07-55- R -O -VV Street Li ht _ROW- Corner of Sylvan Glen Rd and Sea Green tions CUP 08-06 Mono Elm 1405S race Tree Venzon -- ROW- Corner of Diamond Bar Blvd and Path - t PP 2008-38 Utility Pale finder Rd NexlG Networks r ROW- 2100 Block of Diamond Bar Blvd south of PP 2008-39 Ulilily-P0le Kiowa Crest Or NextG Networks ROW- 1600 Block of Diamond Her Blvd north of PP 2008-40 Utility Pole Mariam Laurel Way NexlG Networks - ROW- Boo block of Diamond Bar Blvd south of PP 2008-41 Light Pole J Tin Dr NextG Networks ROW- 1100 Block of Grand Ave north of Dia- fi� . �1PP 2D08A2 Li, ht Pole mond Bar Blvd NmdG Networlw ROW -2400 Block of Grand Ave across Rolling it PP 2008-43 Edison Pole Knoll NexlG Networks 71 ROW- Corner of Diamond Bar Blvd and Golden i, PP 2008-44 _U tili Pole S rinds Drive NextG Networks CUP 2009-03/ DR 2D08-23 Mono Elm 24495East ate Dr erizon LiPole 21400Pathfinder Rd Royal Street Communica- CUP 09-09 ght Stealth in Bid Tower 233DOGolden Spfin� s Dr -Mobile _. - PP 2009-30 Collocation on Mono Elm 1600Granrl Ave T&T PP 2009-31 Monopole 3338Diamond Can on Rd Verizon ' LACountV App roved CUP/CR PL2009-56 Collocation on Monopole _ 333BDiamond Can on Rd T&T )o is 1. .CUP PL 2010-253 Mono Elm 24495East ate Dr -Mobile t.MCUP PL 2010-292 Li ht Pole 241425vivan Glen Rd-MDoila _ m ®k ® ± a§ z\ }\ \\ z\ Om \ 30 \ 0/ 0 � Q �0 ? ~(�/0 \( {�> \ ; ¥ ; 3 } /( �C \ \ \ > > --iR1 k co ) \ \ ) _ m ` ® ± as � }\ \\ \ \\ }ES( _\ Q Q }$ ? \ \( {�> \ ; ¥ ; 3 �C \ \ \ > > --iR1 k co ) \ \ ) _ m ` ® ± as m }\ \ \ \\ }ES( _\ \ \( {�> ; ; ¥ ; 3 \ \ \ \ \ \ / \ \ \0 o _ ± as m 00 00 \ _\ \ \( {�> ; ; ¥ ; 3 o _ ± as m \ _\ \ \( {�> / \ \ . aw m ■ Wk v m y n O m C O m F N m N m N m N O tp O z O r O ' O m N O m N O w A m 5 3 i J J -'. aO r Z O !n J• Jm a O 0 0N^J m fD J -0 m O pJ tp (lHU NN tp ,. 3 m (p 9I ^mJ OO • n pC T m m m y m( 5 m 3,0 30 G) 'm 3.m oa3 <r 3r 3 JC) O m .-. -c n N •r '.0 v F J J m m N m 3 N N.fy W co J J m m c w m n 0 m m O 3. J •* a c a m C C v .ZO7 C .o �o T � A w Zo x m v T m m r0 T v T T v v r T r ..n r r r O O O21C O O O O O ik. N T 41 N A (O O N O N O O Z Z O O Z Z ,n 17 L) Z G) Z Z D D -I -i D D j O T a � `G •G n `G m J � (ml J N � � m v E: 3 m o n ? •2 m w m m Dr o m v n rn y A O J S O d N J J J j O 'O V -O O 0- 0 3 0 3 0 3 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 03 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 3 0 v m m m v m m m m m y m m m y m m m m w w w w w w w � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J JJ J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J 0 J J J J 0 F o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m m m FD' m n m n m n m n m a m n m n m n m a m a n a n n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 m m m m m m to 0 m m m m to 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J 0 J 0 J 0 J 0 J 0 J 0 J 0 J J. J J J J ❑ F F F F F F F F F F F F F F v v m m m v m m v m v m v m > > > > to > m > to > <o > m > � > tp > to > ro > m > ro c0 m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m v v m n m n m n m a m a m n m n v n m n m n m n n n a a n a a n n n a a n n a n n 0 0 0 0 0 Wk v m y VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRFSS T"E PLANNING D—MN4«SION AGENDA ITEM * SUBJECT: TO: Planning Commission Secretary FROM: ADDRESS: DOO. �IY[ _ DRGANIZATION. SUBJECT: -�3 e l d -i/C!Gt DATE: fit' V e- I would like to -address the Planning Commission on the above stated ire n. reflect my name and address as printed above. NOTE: Please have the Commission Minutes All Persons may attend meetings and address th€ p to assist the Chairman in ensuring that all lann� Commissio .This form is intende have the o �o� wishing to address. the ComnA&sion will PPo nity and to ensure correct spelling of ]names in the lYFmutm 5 CyJMiTZ7GWLQNUl_MA MA - NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING AND AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF CALIFORNIA -- u i'9tysl nll� COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES —1---- nc' CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ) eninnsw I, Stella Marquez, declare as follows: On April 12, 2011, the Diamond Bar Planning Commission will hold a regular session at 7:00 p.m., at the South Coast Quality Management District/Government Center Auditorium, 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California. Items for consideration are listed on the attached agenda. I, Stella Marquez, declare as follows: I am employed by the City of Diamond Bar. On April 8, 2011, a copy of the agenda of the Regular Meeting of the Diamond Bar Planning Commission was posted at the following locations: South Coast Quality Management District Auditorium 21865 East Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Diamond Bar Library 1061 Grand Avenue Diamond Bar, CA Heritage Park 2900 Brea Canyon Road Diamond Bar, CA 91765 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on April 8, 2011, at Diamond Bar, California. Stella Marquez Community Development Department CD/ntel la\afridavilposting.doc LOCATION £XISTIN G._. . _ 116 c Microsofto Virtual Earth— I i � 7_ Deur from the Southeast to the Northwest IEZ595ZA Diamond Bar Tin Light Pole VIEW 1 Completed March 11, 2011 APPLICANT CONTACT BLUE WATER DESIGN T -Mobile Sequoia Deployment Services bluewater-design.net 3257 E. Guasii Rd. Suite 2M Monica Moretta michelle@bluewater-design.net Ontario, CA 91761 1 Venture, Suite 200 p 714.473.2942 Irvine, CA 92618 i 949.271.2560 p 949.241.0175 Blue Water D E S I G N Photo simulation accuracy is based on Information provided to Blue Water Design by the applicznt �5r.. EXISTING A°i1y � 3 F .ix ..6 lviicrosoft® Virtual Earth— W." arth— +7 View from the Southwest to the Northeast Lrim 0 UM01 PROPOSED IE2595ZA APPLICANT CONTACT T -Mobile Sequoia Deployment Services Diamond Bar Tin Light Pole 3257 E. Guasti Rd. Suite HID Monica Moretta Ontario, CA 91761 1 Venture, Suite 200 a v Irvine, CA 92618 p 949.241.0175 VIEW 2 Blue Water D E S I G N Completed March 11, 2011 BLUE WATER DESIGN bluewater-clesign.net michelle@bluewater-design.net p 714.473.2942 f 949.271.2560 Photo simulation accuracy is based on information provided to Blue Water Design by the applicant SITE NUMBER: SiTE NAME: SITE TYPE: PROJECT SUMMARY: El IE25952A E 0 Attachment 2 A _tir►Ill :_ ► ,.1_ R.O.W. ANTENNAS INSTALLATION SITE ADDRESS: SAC/ZONING/PERMITDNG: (PRBJMINARRf ADDRESS) SEOUOA DE ELOPMENT SERVICES INC. 760 DIAMOND BAR BLVD. ONIE VENTURE, STE 200 DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 IRVINE CA, 92616 PROPERTY OWNER CONTACT: CONTACT: MONICA MORERA PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY/CRY OF DIAMOND BAR: RYAN MCEIN (909) 839-7016 APPLICANT, LEASING: BOB SALLMAIER T -MOBILE WEST PHONE (949) 753-7203 257 E GUASM RD SUOE200, ONTARIO, G 9176.1 SSURVEY, REPRESENTAUVES' NPNE' CELL¢^ ZONING MANAGER: UNBA PAUL (909) 975-3098 CONSTRUCITON MANAGER.: DENIS DEMARCO (914) 315-6659 DEVELOPMENT MANAGER JENNIFER CARNET .((9091 331-7344 CONSTRUCTION PROJECT IAPNAGER KEVIN SMILE 9095 975-3647 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: M.E.PROJECT ENTAILS: THE INSTALLATION OF T -MOBILE EDUIPMENT PLACED IN9DE A MICROCR 1 577 VAULT (T-2'x4'-10'x8'-IOb). SCE CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE EXIST. 29'-6' OCTAGONAL CONE STREET LIGHT POLE AND REPLACE WITH A NEW 29'-6" ROUND CCNC. STREET UGHT POLE (SCE MATERIAL CODE 040-01244) WITH (2) -PANEL ANTENNAS HOUSED INSIDE A 24' DIA x fib" TALL ANTENNA SHROUD. T—MOBILE CONTRACTOR TO PIKE (1)-20 x48"x17" MYERS ELECTRICAL METER PEDESTAL, (i)-18 i30"x50 TALL RLH PEDESTAL (VAOLT DISCONNECT/GENERATOR HOOKUP) AND (1)-24"x38"%36' TALL (WHEN BASE IS BURIED) RLH T:'PE(07) OF PEDESTAL IN THE DIRT PARKWAY. HUILDING SUMMARY: OCCUPANCY CVS�5IFICATION: UNMANNED TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITY GUPox1-ULIIPoG ItHM: SAC/ZONING/PERMITDNG: ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING: SEOUOA DE ELOPMENT SERVICES INC. GE.S: ONIE VENTURE, STE 200 10640 SEPOLVEDA BLVD. SURE 'I IRVINE CA, 92616 MISSION HILLS, CA 91345 _ CONTACT: MONICA MORERA PHONE (Bi B) 898-2352 PHONE (949) 241-0175 FAX: (818) 89B-9186 LEASING: BOB SALLMAIER CONTACT: PAUL SMOIARSKI . PHONE (949) 753-7203 A-4 SSURVEY, A-5 BERT HAZE D-1 LAND SURVEYING & MAPPING D-2 3180 AIRWAY AVENUE, SURE KI 0-3 COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 9ZE26 E PHONE (714) 557-1567 G -I AX' (]i4) 567-156B SH -1 CONTACT: BERT HAZE - APPROVALS: THE FOLLOWING PARTES HEREBY APPROVE AND ACCEPT MESE DOCUMENTS AND AUTHORIZE THE CONTRACTOR. TO PROCEED WRH ME CONSTRUCTION DESCRIBED HEREIN. ALL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ARE SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY THE LOCAL BUILDING DEPARTMENT AND ANY CHANGES AND MODIRCAHONS THEY MAY MEESE PRINT NAME SIGNATURE DATE LANDLORD R.O.W. PRECON. MGP.. DEVELOP. MGR. CON5T. MGR. PROJECT MGR. ZONING MGR. RF ENGINEER OPER-SIGNS SA.0 REP. CITY: COUNTY: JURISDICTION: v J CI = O O ,bµ G N DIAMOND BAR. LOS ANGELES CITY OF DIAMOND BAR V t•T_DeC � ''4` L, ry CPlp R r ✓ 113. m j Sly nut Czegr.P Paw Rio _Gz'S .Rj CIL S _± pnTj P: T w ,Mobile e Get inure from life V anoyn �nS7neafreleRg s®svi os PRESCOTT COMMUNICATIONS INC. 106905epwN a BM3 Suite 1, MBaion l CA91345 Pl ne No.:(010)110 -2352 Fm No (818)898-9106 TlaQUOIA�1AFNE Ona Venlwe SUIIe 2 W. Irvine, LA 92618 Plmne No.: (949N14'RM Faz Ne_(9C9)]ATdl3 1 109-01-19 1 PRELIMINARY 2 109-23-101 REVISED PER DRM SHEET INDEX: SHEET NUMBER.: DESCRIPTION: T-1 ME SHEET T-2 ABB RI SYMBOLOGY AMC GENERA. NOTES SURVEY - Al -1 SERE PLM A -Z DETAILS A-3 DETAILS - A-4 ELEVATIONS & EOUWMENT DCIAILS A-5 ELEVATIONS D-1 RE INFORMATION D-2 MICROCFIL 5P INTERIOR ELEVATON DUALS 0-3 VENT DETAILS E POWER PEDESTAL DETAILS - G -I GROUNDING DETAILS SH -1 TRENCH SHIELD & TRENCH SHORING NOTE SH -2 TRENCH SHORING DETAILS APPROVALS: THE FOLLOWING PARTES HEREBY APPROVE AND ACCEPT MESE DOCUMENTS AND AUTHORIZE THE CONTRACTOR. TO PROCEED WRH ME CONSTRUCTION DESCRIBED HEREIN. ALL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ARE SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY THE LOCAL BUILDING DEPARTMENT AND ANY CHANGES AND MODIRCAHONS THEY MAY MEESE PRINT NAME SIGNATURE DATE LANDLORD R.O.W. PRECON. MGP.. DEVELOP. MGR. CON5T. MGR. PROJECT MGR. ZONING MGR. RF ENGINEER OPER-SIGNS SA.0 REP. CITY: COUNTY: JURISDICTION: v J CI = O O ,bµ G N DIAMOND BAR. LOS ANGELES CITY OF DIAMOND BAR V t•T_DeC � ''4` L, ry CPlp R r ✓ 113. m j Sly nut Czegr.P Paw Rio _Gz'S .Rj CIL S _± pnTj P: T w ,Mobile e Get inure from life V anoyn �nS7neafreleRg s®svi os PRESCOTT COMMUNICATIONS INC. 106905epwN a BM3 Suite 1, MBaion l CA91345 Pl ne No.:(010)110 -2352 Fm No (818)898-9106 TlaQUOIA�1AFNE Ona Venlwe SUIIe 2 W. Irvine, LA 92618 Plmne No.: (949N14'RM Faz Ne_(9C9)]ATdl3 1 109-01-19 1 PRELIMINARY 2 109-23-101 REVISED PER DRM J7 3y� Ci REVISED PZ. a•" 3 11-10-10 CRY COMMENTS VH REVISED PER 4 0} -20 -ii LANDSCAPING TL DIRECTIONS FROM T—MOBILE DFRCE wwu¢m_ awm se%w rwuwx 1wxoxw ew msumww s'x„Fwr. - 213M THOMAS GUIDE REGION: LOS .MGELE5 PAGE 640 GRD p. CI RENScO PER 5 D7 -31 -ii PITY f.DMMFNTS '� � J7 3y� Ci � ...A DIRECTIONS FROM T—MOBILE DFRCE wwu¢m_ awm se%w rwuwx 1wxoxw ew msumww s'x„Fwr. - 213M THOMAS GUIDE REGION: LOS .MGELE5 PAGE 640 GRD p. CI APPLICABLE CODES CALIFORNIA AOMINISI�i HIDE CODE 2006 CALIFORNIA BUILOTAIG CODE UNIFORM MECHAJ41C6 CODE ANSI/EW.-222_p LI SAFEST' COLE NEPA-101 2006 UNIFOP.M PLUTABING CODE 2006 NATIONAL ELEr.=TC CODE LOCAL allILDING CGDE CITY,/COUNTY GRelugrCES POWER ZCD: COMPANY: SCE COMPACT: VERIZOA CA (GTE) CONTACT: FELICIA JOH660N CONTACT: TED PHONE: (SGS) 11-5-57 PHONE. O 6 103-02-111 REVISED VAULT IE25952A POLE #422607E (PREUMINMY ADDRESS) 760 DIAMOND BARBLVD. DANOND BAR, PA91765 TITLE SHEET �,rv«..... ' T-1 fC.E.S. PROJ.53872045 DW13A MBIM28 SYMBOL - DESCRPTiON GENERAL NOTES .AND CONDITIONS E.C.D. EDGE OF DIRE FIELD SYMBOLOGY 1 I GENERAL i40TES T • eMobile me Get more from life angle eng(neesr(ng 5emfaa= PRESCOTf COMMUNICATIONS INC. 10690 Se,M NNde BNB. Suite 1, W4MMU H&L CA 9130.5 P)Wne Ne.:(010)09&2352 FaxNo.:(018)090-9106 fii�!LEO�UOIA RONTOne VeMwe Sulle 200, llwre. G 92610 Phone N,(9N9)419-T2ii2 Faz No_ry99)79-] 1 09-01-10 PRODUCTS & SUBSTITUTIONS GENERAL NOTES: s But W/L WID51INE INTENT 1L I.IHFSE CONETRUMDN DR WAGS DESCRIBE THE M. TO BE DDNE I. SUBMIT 3COPIES OF EACH WOUEST FOR SUBSRRRION. IN EACH 1, INDEMMISCM CLAUSE: THE CDFRACTOR AGREES AND SiLW.: REWESI IOENTIN THE PRODUCT OR FABRICATION DR WSMUATON k THE MATERIALS TO M FURNISHED FOR WO TRUCTIM. MEFMOO i0 BE REPL4CED BY RE SUMTIIUTKIN INCLUDE RELATED ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE IRESPONS!BIn OF THE JOBSRE MNDFITOx THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING THE 20.W. RIGFTOFWAY 2 -NE INTENTION OF THE DOCUMENTS IS TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR AND SPECIPRATM S[RMDN AND DRAWING NUMBERS AND MMFIUMc DURING GOLUMENTATM SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH NiE REQUIREMENTS FUR SAF^. OF ALL PELSMS ANDA mnOIES. ...t4I THESc REIU MENUS BG - MATEIWS REASONABLY NECESSARY FOR THE PP.OPFR IDQRUION AND. SUBSPTUIDNS 1.1 APPLY CO - UTSLY MIO NOT aE UNITED LO NORMAL WORMNG TO - WMPLETON OF THE WOR( AS S61UMTED IN THE WNTRAGT. HOURS AND CONORONS THE CON(MCTOR FORTHER TREES DELI 3.THE PURPOSE OF THE SPECIFlDUUt S IS TO INTERPRET THE INTENT OF L SUBMIT ALL NECESSARY PRODUCT GTA MID CUT :HE WHICH IND=1ANItt AND HOLD T -NUBILE REPRESENTAITS. AND ENGINEERS MEAN E55 FROM ANY AND AL LNBRJIY. REAL CIO. ALLE430 N COFINECTDN E.O.P. EWEDFPAVEMENT THE DRAWINGS AM TO DESIGNATE THE METHOD OF )HE PROCEDURE, PMPOLY INDICATE AND DESCRIBE THE ITEMS, PRODUCTS & MATERIALS TYPE AND OUALTY OF MUEWLS REWIRED M CWAP LL THE WOP.K BEING INSTALLED. T4 CONTRACTOR SHALL IF DEEMED NECESSARY W WRH T4 PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK ON THIS PROJECT. THE DINNER SUBMIT ACTUAL SWPLES TD THE OM M FOR APPROVAL IN L PPAOR TO THE BEGINNING OF ANY WNSTRuCMON AND THROUGHOUT THE VH 3 4.MINp2 pEVMTIWS FROM THE DESIGN IATUUT ARE M`;ICIPAIEp AND LIEU C£ CUT SNEES. COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SFALL FULLY COMPLY WIRY 4MA TONAL 5>FLT" AND HEALTH° ALT of T9T$ CIN COMIMENTs SeW1 BE CONSIDERED AS PART OF TIC WORK. NO CHANGES THAT INCLUDING ALL RM510F8 AND AMFNMAENIb THERETO. DING 10145 CIL CENTERLINE ALTER THE GHARXTER of NE WORK WILL BE MADE OR PERMITTED BY THE OWNER WITHOUT MEUM4C A CHANCE ORDER. - 3. ALL WORK SHdLL CCNF R T. THE LATEST EDITION OF CA 95, IM- AND PUBLIC wKMKS CMSIRUCTON', AS THE SAINII'SPECIFlUTONS TOR ADOPTED W THE CITY, COUNTY OR STATS AS MODIFIED W STANDARD PLANS VH CODE COMPLIANCE AND ADDENWMS. - REVISED PER 2. HE E%1SIENCE AND lf%A TiDx 17F uiuJn ESap D Ic T 01-20-i i CIF CURBFACE BY A SFFRIii OG PVNUR E OC SiATc H ARE OBTMNBf ASU S. OPNJILE W(OI MPLOABLE LOCA_ ACI ES AS SIiOWN EPECN CONFLICTS CALL WORK S0LL BE IN ALC F LR -LEY HALL POO FEDERAL REGUUON THESE SHALL INCLUDE BUT NO BE LMIITO OR OTHER FACILITIES 1MY U= THE LYWTR4CSE GIBE V -v TIE OF AND 51 USE EATREME CAPE TL PRI TO ,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFlCATCN OF ALL TO THE LATEST VISION DU 1tiE FOLLOVINC: PRIOR TO DAMAGE TO OIESE F/LIVTES. S TO T AND RtOTFS,'iNE ME451,AE6 TO MEA VH MFASWGEMENIS AT THE SITE ME E MOLTING ANY MA3EI OR THE.CONTRACTCI4 IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THF_ PRO1[LTON OF ALL MUtt EE FOR REVISED PER DEWS ANY WORK NO Eri PA CHARGE OR COMPENSATION SHALL BE Tlp6 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE. AGENCY EAGLHISS WITHIN THE OMITS qt WLYNK. MiE1HER THEY 5 P/L PRO.PsMUNE ALLOWED DUE TO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ACTWL DIMENSIONS AND ZWE CAIMU ELECTRICAL CODE AF DIMENSIONS INDICATED IN THE WNSTRUCTION DRNWINGS. ANY SUCH Ewe CALIFORNIA PLUNGING CODE. ARE SHOWN W lllt5 PVN OR NOT. _ 06CREPANI:Y IN DJM SONS WHICH MAY BE FOUND SHALL BE 2pp6 LA,"RN(A MECHANICAL CODE S. WE CONRRMIM SHALL N " UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALE (BOO) SUBMITTED TO THE MIER FOR CONSIDERATION BEFORE THE 2006 GIATONS GUMMA WOE OF REC 227-2600 AT IF TWO MRMNG DAYS PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY REVISED IANDSPIWE/ J5 CpMRACTOR PROCEEDS WITH THE WORK IN THE AFFECTED AJR-A- FOR ENENGY CONSERVATION. "MATIM. 03-02-11 -X-X-X-X-X- FENS 6. THE CONTRM'iOR 51N11 NOTIFY THE CO,, COUNTY OR STATE ENGINEER 2. THE BIDDER., IF AWARDED THE CONTRACT, WAl NOT BE ALLOWED ANY INSURANCE AND BONDS BEFOREANY T, (909) OUuNM7T M LEAST lW0 YYS BEFORE START OF ANY WORK FEOUIRWG THEIR INVOLVEMENT START EX COMPENSOTON BY P.EASON OF ANY MAT OR THING CONCERNING WHICH SUCH BODER MIGHT HAVE FULLY INFORMED THEMSELVES PRIOR TO OSE BIDDING. I. CONIRPCTOR SHN1 AT THEIR OWN EXPENSE CARRY TND MAINTAIN FOR 7. ALL WOW AREA AND GREET TRAFFIC C9NMOL SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WiiA THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE WORK ARF TRAFFIC CONR91- Bu. - OON3,NO WALL OF THE PROJECT ALL INSURANCE AS Unlrb AAD THE DHMA% REO AND SpMINCAnMS F,am THE CRY. COUNTY M STATE 3, NOPLEA [{" IGNORANCE OF CONDITIONS THAT "IST, DR OF LISTED. DIFFICULTIES OR COMIOMs THAT MAY BE ENCOUNTERED OR OF 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT COIAMENCE HAITI THEW WORK UNTIL TEEM HAVE R. TIL CITY. CWNIT OR STT, SHALL SPECIFY THE EXPIRATION PENCE) OF PERMIT flA 1115 CONSTFUCTIOp PROJECT. ANY OTHER RELEVANT MATTER CONCERNING THE WORK TO BE PRFSETHi--_0 AN ORIGINAL C,R RCATE OF INSIPANLE STATING ALL THE PERM MEN IN THE lDQMLlON OF THE VNRK WALL BE ACCEPTED COVERAEES TO WE MOM9. THE MINIMUM COVER FOR ALL CONDUR5 PULm UNDERGROUND S , BE DRIVEWAY AS AN URNSE FOR MY FAILURE OR GUISGM ON THE PMT OF M INCHES TO THE FlNWO GRADE AT N1 TIMET TRE CONTRACTOR TO NIFM11. EVERY p TAIL OF ALL TIE 3 -THE OWNER SIMLL BE NANEO AS AN AGERIMAL INSURED W ALL REOUIREMENIS OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS GOVERNING THE POUCIES. 10. THE CIXTR?ROR S ALL WN,,F ALL CURB AND GUTTERS AND BORE AU- TIE TAY, WOyI Q WMETE ORIVEWAY5 MID WALKWAYS AT TI£ WREtS OF ASTER AGRMENT FOR REOUIRM INSURANCE UMITS COUNTY OR STALE INSPECTOR. 4. TO THE MEE TITTER BI/ 0 11. ALL AG AND/W CONCRETE PAVEMENT SHALL BE RERACM AT THE ENGINEERS. ADMINISTRATION DIRECTION V THE CRY. COUNTY M STATE I2. ALL SHRum. PDMS ION TREES THAT HIVE 6MY DAMAGED 0R OISEM3 WARRAIViIES & BONDS I. BEFORE THE COMMENC`J.¢FR OF MFT WORK, THE CONRAMM WTL WRING THE COURSE OF THE WOR, SFA BE R9UN G AND/OR R`SLi M WORK SIRE TO ITS =Dl4AL COMMM. TSE ASSGN A PROJECT MANAGER WHO WILL ALT AS A SINGLE POINT ()F SO AS M R�i10P.E THE (.CONTRACTOR 6 RESPONSIBLE FOR PFWUGTON AND PAYMENT EL DUMPINGNOLM IN 195 FEGNMtA THIS CONTACT FOR ALL PVILL 13 1F DAMAGE OCCURS TO THE PY OR COUNTY FACILITIES. THE C9.N. ACTOR. W CONTRACTOR. LICENSES AND BONDS. EFO PgOIECF MWMSEF NSLL BE OflELOPING A MPSTER SLTiECUL FOR THE BE MALI- IMMmMTELY NDOFY; TRMEC [OMROL UGYpNG, ((9G9) 396-5671 ,.SU MASTER CpATMACTOH SpMCFS AGPEF?1EM FOR AOORONAL PROJECT WHICH WILL SUBMITTED TO RE OWNER PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK SKEET LIC NTNG (INMI olt-1911. ® UT/L/IYPOLE DETAILS. 2 SUBMIT A IRAN TYPE PROGRESS U4ART NOT MORE THAN THREE (3) MYS 14. AT LEAST TlO DAYS PRIOR TOe E 595-2CDMIAETCEMENT OF ANY VH]IA(. NOTIFY TRAFFO 3UFFAV (_0.°) 595-2264 ANO THE FAE OEPMTMENT; AFTER THE DALE ESTABL'SHED FOR COMMENCEMLTT OF THE WORK M IB )OUR.-' (-O9) 598-6N_0' ME SCHEDULE INDICATNC A TIME W FOR :NCH M CR UrGORY OF WOW TO BE PERFORMED AT Tlv SITE, PROPERLY SEQUBICW AND IS THE CONiRACTOP. VILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR TBE PROCESSING 91 All I COORDINATED WITH OTHER ELENENTS OF WORK & STOWING CDMPIEHON APPUW n PERMIT FORMS ALONG W,H THE P.EWIRET LL LGY MAGUSHED FOR FORMS. CLEft1LY DE WHRRAEK THAT T -MID OBIL THE CRN, )l-YEL =FLIGHT STORAGE OF TIE WORK SUFFlCIENRY IN AMANCE OF THE DATE INSURANCE � SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION OF RE STE. COUNTY OR STATE AS MSO IxrD WIN NE RMUNUA9INSUFMCE IN 1.,J1 MATERIALS MUST BE STORED IN A 1£VAND D DRY FASHION AND IN THE AM(N)N,CF $ Low.0,FOR iH5 CONSTRUCTION MOJEC. A MANNER THAT DOES NOT NECESSARILY OBSTPUR RE FLOW OF OTHER 3, PRIOR N WMMMCNGTHE OWNER SPALL SCHEDULE AN 16 VAULTS, PEU©TAL, CONDUITS AND OTHER TYPES M GASSER CTURE W PAR.4ING METER/$lFfFTSIGN WORK. ON -SIE MEETING M. ALL IANOR PARCONSTRUCTION, TES. TSS WOULD INCLUCE ARE EVER SPMF© ON THIS PIAN OR MJ- BE SPECOM 9Y THE (ROUGH NOT UMTEO TO) THE OWNER PROJECT MANAGER. MNTACTOR, WNSTRUGTON ENGHO0E ANY AND ALL DBMTONS MOM THE SPECIFIED 2.675 CABINET_ MUST BE STORED INSIDE UNTIL THERE IS POWER W Srt UND OWNER REPRESENMATNE, LOCAL TELEPHONE COMPANY, TONER TYPE] OF MP.TBi41L MUST 3E APF oO BY THE SYSIN ENGINEER IN ' ERECTION FOREMAN (IF SMCORRACTED). WRI BEFORE INSWLUATNNN TknZQF. 3.STORAGE METHOD MUST MEET ALL RFLOMMENGTOHS OF THE I). ML U.G. CONDUIT MUS' BE SCRCDVLE <0 OR 8171ER. - A �fYA'Q/Y ASSOM ED MAWFACNRER. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL RE ECUIPPM.0 WON SURE MEANS iB. CONCUR REWRBlENTS EE ER. THIS COMMUPIMATONS. SUCH PSA LIED PHONE ORA GMEu.. NOR TO-SC4EOUL£ GD E%CEPT ALLaRADIUS0 CONDUITS EpUIPMENi nILL NOT BE SUPPLIED 6Y THE BY THE OWAFT. MOR Y.9LL TO BE SCH. W PoSUZ5-SCHEDULE ESO WIRETFis sEiNGE BE ARRANC£Il. 5, DURING CANSTRUCTON, LONRMTOR MUST ENSURE THAT EMPLOYEES LB FlRt„HroRAN( AND SUBCONTRACTORS WENT HARD H4T5 AT ALL TIMES. CTM'TRACTCR 11. GROUND RECUR, HEV S: S/b' TODD E:xGM RELATED DOCUMENTS AND WILL COMPLY HAIR ALL T -MOBILE SAS REOUIP.EABTS IN TAM W GROUND WIRE AGREEMENT. WO COORDINATION AT j,,,R END 6FeD o D2' MEN3ROiLE o UM17')/A M - 6, PRWIDU MRTEN ONLY UPDATES FUND PHOTOGRAPHS OF ON SITE CONE SEALANT AT 60.5 I.GFNERAL CONSTRJCTBN ELECTMAL AND ANTENNA ORAWNGS ARE PROGRESS TO NE PROJECT MW AGER VN E -MAL 20. THE MYERS EL EWAL NAL PEDESTAL NEEDS SNEALA INITERREIATID, IN P46[UA NCE OF THE WORK, THE CONRACTOR MUST AROUND THE PPO TO PREVENT SAN INISMI N (E&VE 1,2 INCH OPENING) AND HF TO ALL DRAWINGS. ALL COORDINATION SHALL M THE 7.A COKNL E INVENRRY OF CONSRUCTON AATERMLS AND MUIPMEM 5 ADD D-SICCWi BAG 'AOCOA' TYPE 1, SQE 16 TO PEOESIAL AS REOUIREO. RESFnMSTBNTY U THE WMgACTOR. REQUW.EO P GR TO SART OF CONSRUMML ' Zl. POWER REQNREIdENT FOR 3 WHiE SESVICE 120/24cV. 201 UTTLTYMANHnFF B. GINNER / MANAGER N WITTING NO LESS TNN <8 Z2, STALL NIITFY PFOB & TELCO IAMPAMES TIRE£ DOSS PRIOR N. HOURS IN To CTAT O HOURS IN ADVANCE OF WNCREE PARS. TOWER ERECTIONS, ANO CONCRETE FOR CONDUIT WS'ECi510 SND OF WNSRLID EOJSE= CABINET ROSE I.G OR RANDG GEM. CHANGE ORDER. PROCEDURE 2i AN M1 PAOPOSEO SITE FIE fflWITH COMPIDNT ALL OF . CELWLAN SITE MUST BE IAM 1W. WFu ALL GO 95, AND GD 12a 9. 0.05EWT PACKAGE IS WE COMPLETE WITH DETAILED TOP PHOTOS OF UI 15 DUE COM P.Ef.ULATONs AS ?RESCP.SED BY SiaTE IAw. ENGINEERI OF NPS SEWERMCNHDLI: 1. CHANCE ORDERS MAY BE INRKiED BY THE OWNER MD/OR THE UPON SITE MNCHWAUK WRI PROJECT M4NKER (SEE PROJECT MANAGER -k D'IeE LAW SNE MUST BE AP"WEO M THE �eSIGIWG ENGINEERING FlRM OR AN MuAUY CUAUFIEO ENGINEERING COMPANY. CONTRACTOR INVOLVED, TRE LONERACTOR, UPON %ARVIL REWEST F..OM FOR SAMPLE CLOSEOUT PACKAGE). AN THE OWNER SHALL PREPARE A WHIFFET PROPOSAL DESCRIBING THE CHANGE IN WORN M MATERIALS M0 ANY CHANGES IN THE CONTRACT ANgUNT AND PRESENT TO THE OWNER WITHIN 72 H?.5 FOR APPROVAL. SQUAREVFNI' Su A T REWESTS FOR SUREY UTIMS IN THE FORM AND IN W ACLGRMNCE WITH PROCEDURES REWIRED FOR CHANGE MOM PROPDSRS. ANY CHANGES IN THE SCOPE OF WORK OR MATERIALS MICH ARE PERFORMED BT THE CONTRACTOR eU.T A WRITER UP CHANCE ODDER AS DESCRIBED & APPROVED BY TRE OWNER SPAE - CLEAN f ROUND VIN: PUCE FULL RESPONSIBILITY OF THESE ACTIONS ON THE COMT.MLTQR. SHALL AT ML TIMES KEEP THE SITE FP.FE FROM THE LOLATION OF OR RUBBISH MEW O ALPLOYEE " KATSTE IECOL5 EMPLOYEES AT WORK WORK.AUSM TH .41 ABOU- NOF THE WOR, THEY SEMI - FROM ANO THE INC M, WCLUDING REMOVE ALL EP OM E OLS. SP. MA S AND SURPLUS MATERIM.S PNO SHNL NDS ALL THEW TGWOR {CLEAN DTG'ACmTS AND SHOP DRAWINGS LuvE RBR WORK L1.Ew Ano PB,Gr ma usE 1. COWPACTOR SF'. Ll SUBMIT 5TQP ORANNGS < REOU1,90 AND LISTED2. wSUALLY INSPECT EXTERIOR SURFACES AND REMCWE k1 TRACES OF - IN THESE ]?>WINCS T^ T4F DI'/FUER FOR A PP.PJAL SAIL. WASE "TRLLL5. SMVEGES & OTHER FORBGN MAT- HANDICAPRAMP 2 ALL SHOP 11.11NC•_= S4EL BS REnryf'_O. CYEclam AND CORRECTED BY 3. REMNE ALL TRACES OF SPUSIM W ILP.IALS FROM AP4CEM / I\ WNIRACLvF. PRIOR 7C 59BMITi1I TO 1N:E Y.RIER. CES. TO XHnEnE A UNIFORM DEGE OF LLEANWaE�. HOSE 4. IF NELTH DOM E ff£IRIOq OFTHE SR, �E FIELD SYMBOLOGY 1 I GENERAL i40TES T • eMobile me Get more from life angle eng(neesr(ng 5emfaa= PRESCOTf COMMUNICATIONS INC. 10690 Se,M NNde BNB. Suite 1, W4MMU H&L CA 9130.5 P)Wne Ne.:(010)09&2352 FaxNo.:(018)090-9106 fii�!LEO�UOIA RONTOne VeMwe Sulle 200, llwre. G 92610 Phone N,(9N9)419-T2ii2 Faz No_ry99)79-] 1 IE25952A POLE #422667E (PREUMINARYAOOREB9) 760 DWBONO BARBLW- OIAMOND BAR, CAB1760 PRE\,\M\t� SHEEFTB E ABBREVIATIONS, SYMBOLOGY AND GENERAL NOTES sxeEl wumnlx /AA/// Tw2 2 C.E.S. PROD. 836720.15 DWG.8TMB5002B 09-01-10 PREUMINARY s But 1L aMA 09-223-10 RP/ISER DRhi BG - TL kP REVISED PER VH 3 11-10-10 CIN COMIMENTs TL VH REVISED PER 4 01-20-i i LANDSCAPING m TL VH REVISED PER VH 5 01-31711 CIT! COMMENI5 REVISED IANDSPIWE/ J5 6 03-02-11 REVISED VAULT „ IE25952A POLE #422667E (PREUMINARYAOOREB9) 760 DWBONO BARBLW- OIAMOND BAR, CAB1760 PRE\,\M\t� SHEEFTB E ABBREVIATIONS, SYMBOLOGY AND GENERAL NOTES sxeEl wumnlx /AA/// Tw2 2 C.E.S. PROD. 836720.15 DWG.8TMB5002B NDTESES: I)R s1 - BE ME CONTRNCIOF.'S PESFONSWLIIT TO C9PigNaTE WRFI PNOPERT' OWNeR t WFGE S4W xam COMPANIES FCR TIE LEGA.. OF ALL ENISTNC GEILW CONDE UTIUNES PROP m 9ECINWNG CONSTRIICncR. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REPON519LE FOR MY DMAGE COSTS ASSOMTED VnDI EOSPNG BELLOW G-RAOE UmmES. 2)CONFACTOR TO COMUN4 a PDd UTI M COMPANY FOR CONNECTION OF e'I—.WD PEANMEAr FEWER TO TXE SITE. TIE TEMPMMI M.. MO ALL REGROUP COSTS TO BE PND BY COMPACTOR. 3)COMRACTM TO VERIFY LOLL MLTIT REWIRVAENTS FOR OEPM SITE G SERMARON OF COMM PRIOR TO INSTNAIATDN. NOTIFY CONSTRUCTION GAGER IpmY WWO OF MY DISCREPANCIES. QCON IDR TO CNL DIG VERT (800)-227-26911 A MINIMUM OF a HRS PRIM M UCWATNG FOP. UNDERGROUND MT LOCATI CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBL M HAVE ALL NDNPUEM UTILITIES LG0O AT T4DR EWN E%PENSE 5)PROPOSED `GI SERNCES SIOWN MED TO BE VERRXTB & APPRIXT.O BY unw, COMPANIES BEFORE START OF CONSfRUCOM. COMRiC10R TO VERIFY W. T -NOBLE PROJECT PMRCER M MYON FINAL APPREW, B)LwES SHOWN W NOT REPRESENT TRE EXACT LECTION OF THE CONDUIT ROS CDNTB4 R TO VERIFY SEWCE ILCADONS w/AGI FIELD CY.`.YORuNS. T) WNTWFTOR S'MLL IMMEDIATELY INFORM T -MOBILE OF .1 ACCIDWTAL DAMAGE TO WSGNG UTU ES W TELEPHONE AND E-WJL REGARDLESS OF A9MY TO REPAIR OR xTGGA E. A F9LLOW-U1 E-AV8 REPORT WITH DIGITAL PNOTOS W01 RE REWIRED EARLY I I- PERILUTCN HAS BEEN ACCEPTED BY T -MOBLE AND AFFECTED SWYICE PROWLFR5 ANO RECIPIENTS. AT MBR OWN DIPENSE CDMR+LTOP. WILL E%ERCLL ISE AEFFOG TS TO MN REPAIRS MARE BY DUA RTEO TECRIRANS AS APPROVED BY SEMCE PROYN9t. �K TYPICAL VAULT DETAIL B AD rG scaE m WE GT m1Nt tlTFSt'� M UNDERGROUND UTIUTIES NOT THE LOCATIONS AND EXISTENCE OF ANY UNDERGROUND PIPES, STRUCTURES OR CONDUITS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN WERE OBTAINED BY A SEARCH OF AVAILABLE RECORDS. THERE MAY BE EX. UTILITIES OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO TAKE PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES TO PROTECT THE UUIUIf LINES SHOWN AND ANY OTHER LINES NOT SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. UPUtt UNE tt'rE LEGENC' i-Mo311E CONDUIT -- PCWCR _— -_ --WATER—_ _— . WONE . - - TEET LICARI - - OIL -- - xW:R -- -ETORM DRAIN - ((I) 7' -2'x4' -10"x8' -10"d MC 577 VAULT. T-MOBILECONTRACTORTOPLACE C 1-18'x30"x5D" RLH PEDESTAL ,VAULT DISCONNECT/GENERATOR PLUG) - T -MOBILE CONTRACTORTO PLACE i-24"x36"x36" RLH (TYPE 07) PEDESTAL NOTE ALL GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT ANO VENTS TO BE PAINTED DARK GREEN. T -MOBLE CONTRACTORTO PLACE EXIST. SCE MANHOLE (POSSIBLE T -MOBILE POWER SOURCE NOTE: EXACT SOURCE OF FEED AND ROUTING, TO BE PRONGED UPON COMPLETION OF TELCO MEET. NOTE: ALL PROPOSED UTILITIES WILL BE UNDERGROUND a y 4 ITEM DESCRIPTION O 264'-0" MYERS METER PEDESTAL TO RLH PEDESTAL #i 1-2" SGH, 40 PVC CONDUIT (T -MOBILE POWER) OII' -0' MC 577 VAULT TO RLH PEDESTAL e1 1-2" SCH. 40 PVC CONDUIT (T -MOBILE POWER) O3 18'-0' MC 577 VAULT TO RLH PEDESTAL #2 1-2" SCH. 40 PVC CONDUIT (T -MOBILE TELCO) O30'-0" MC 577 VAULT TO (SPUCE)-VAULT 1 4 2-4" SCH. 40 PVC CONDUITS (T -MOBILE COMM.) OG'-0" (SPLICE) VAULT 1 TO SITE PDLL 5 2-4" SCH. 40 PVC CONDUITS (T -MOBILE COMM.) T • •Mobile Get more from fife cable engine®ring SBrYieB3 PRESCOTT COMMUNICATIONS INC. 10640 Se ulV da BF+d Suite 1. WI HNa, CA 9130.5 PNwa N,:(818)098-2352 Fa NE:(018)696-9186 FQ OIA e3 vam-, v'RT1GFs IM ona Venwre sole 200, Wna, CA S2618 Pllmle NO.:(949)41P7202 Fax No.:(e W9 72D3 /)J- �c1 1 09-01-10 PP.EUMINARY BG /I S¢ R ' 4 � aob TL 2 ' 09 -23 -ID REVISED PER DRM �. BG /REVISED VIA "I° I VAULT 7 JW RP 5 c?�D 3 11-10-10 DY COMMENTS LL gg VIS REED PER VH 4 01-20-11 LANDSCAPING VM 5:B" TL SFD PER VH O /5 2'.6' g 5 01-37-11 CITY COMMENTS r� REVISED LANDSCAPE/ JO O� 6 03-02-11 REVISED VAULT s SCE CONTRACTORTO REPLACE y EXISTING 29'-6" OCTAGONAL CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE 14422607E WITH A NEW 29•-6• ROUND CONCRETE I' STREET UGHT POLE WITH A 24' Ot" 66" TALL j2''- ANTENNA SHROUD UN TOP. (T -MOBILE SITE POLE) SM INFORMATft.. AREACONC5.5E FROMSIDEWALK IE25952A AREA 5.5' FROM EDGE OF DIRT PARKWAY e TO CURBFACE. POLE #42260TE ' = 75ODIAINARYA RBLVD. r 5. 6„ z r-vomc cmix DIAMOND BAR, CA 97765 STAMP: ST, AT&T (SBC) MANHOLE PIOSSIB ET-MOBILETELCOSOURCE g� NOTE: 2l' EXACT SOURCE OF FEED AND ROUTING j TO BE PROVIDED UPON COMPLETION OF TELCO MEET. EXIST. VEP,IZZON CA (GTE) MANHOLE SHEETTIOE POSSIBLE TA1,081E TELCO SOURCE SITE PLAN / $ CITY OF DIAMNOD BAR PERMIT INFORMATION A A c CAICO STREET FOOTAGE 22B'-0" S SHEET NUMRB2: CONE. SIDEWALK FOOTAGE e''-0" GRAPHIC SCALE wz+emrL MO_ Awl R DIRT PARKWAY FOOTAGE BB• -0• H ` TOTAL FOOTAGE: 294'-0" FEET e L I C.E.S. PRGJ.^„38720.15 DWG.:TM810028 EXIST. CAN HANDHOLE__ --- _____________ ACE � MC 577 VAULT. SIZtEEr LIGHT POLE FOUNDATION 2.5'x2.5' IN DIRT AREA TO EDGE OF PROPERTY LINE. CONCRETE SIDEWALK AREA 5.5' FROM EDGE OF DIRT PARKA TO CURBFACE. TO MYERS METER PEDES,. (SEE SHEET A-1) SCE CONTRACTOR TO REPLACE�'�/'� EXISTING 29'-6" OCTAGONAL CONCRETE STREET LIGFIT POLE 44422607E WITH A NEW 29'-6" ROUND CONCRETE STREET LICHT POLE WITH A 24" DIA >; LL�'+�ti1F�I.H�l.�S �U�ON TOP - Y -1.4061E SITE PLL , NOTE: NEW LIGHT POLE, AN ENIVA RADOME AND GPS ANTENNA SHOULD BE PAINTED TO MATCH EXISTING STREET LIGHT POLES. DETAILS DETAIL" A" SCALE T =5 / I NOTE: ALL PROPOSED UTILITIES WILL BE UNDERGROUND NOTE: ADDITIONAL EXCAVATION REQUIRED FOR SHORING DIRT PARKWAY PROPERTY LINE APEA 2.5' FROM 5' FROM CUF6FACE. ECCE OF SIDEWALK. TO PROPER f LINE _ T -MOBILE CONTRACTOR ToPLACE 1-18"x30"x5D" RLH PEDESTAL. (VAULT DISCONNECT/GENERATOR PLUG) ONTRACTORTO PLACE K36" RLP (TYPE 07) PEDESTAL. MAs 110USE0 INSIDE NOTE: ALL CP,OUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND VENTS TO BE PAINTED DARK GREEN. T - -Mobile I.® Get more from life cable ¢ngiogln¢¢ring Samoan= PRESCOTT COMMUNICATIONS INC. f 0690 Sepulveda BNtl. SuOe 1, Mission HBs. CA 91395 Phme Ns.:IB1B)09&2352 Faz No.: (810)89&8186 CONSULTINGGROUR ta-L- 01A . � oravenous Supe29q I.m B2B1B PBmre N".:(90)419-7202 Fsx Ne.:(999)7S+ IODATE -DESCRIPTION:- 1 0?*REM PRELIMINARY 2 09SED PER DRM �.VISED PER3. 11 COMMENTSEVISED PER4 01ANDSCAPINGEVISED PER5 01Y COMMENTS6 03ED LANDSCAPE/�VISED VAULT IE25952A POLE #422667E (PRELIMINARY ADDRESS) 760 DIAMOND BAR BLVD. DNIMOND BAR,CAS1766 DETAILS SHEET NUMBER SCALE: A,,21 5' C.E.S. PROD. &3872045 DWG. MR1010028 Proposed Excavation Replace base and finished serfoce elect to or greater than existing as per agency. standards and 9pprovol of city, county or tate inspector. Cement Slurry Barkfill m e1 Proposed E.cavotion Replace base end finished Surface eauol to or granter than existing as per agency standards d approval of uty, county nr state apeatar, Existing Grass Parkway n T � nMobile ii Get more from life V angle anglnaering samiaes PR.ESCOTT COMMUNICATIONS INC. 10800 GepuWeda GWtl. SuOe 1. kflibn tf�, CA 9130.5 Phone No.: (810)09&2352 Fm No.: (818)898-9106 SCALE SCALE: 2 DETAILS , _t aETA1L5 , =5 Proposed ExcavaUon Replace base and finished surface equal to or create, thon existing as per agency standards and approval of Existlnq city, county or state inspector Gross Parkway Existing Cross Parkway Cement Slurry U Backfill DETAILS IE25952A POLE #422607E (PREUMINARY ADDRESS) 760 DIAMOND BARBLVD. DIAMOND BAR, CASTUS DETAILS .3 �I C.E.S. PROd. ,T38i®G.=TM81DD20 Existing Gross Parkway CONSULTING GROUP: \ SEQUOIA amawas sarncrs. ,nc Cement Slurry OnB VBnNre 3YXB 2aa, XVaC0A92516 PMnBNa.:(W)419-7262 Fez Na.:19e9RiYTN3 Backfill N0. —DATE:—DESCRIMW. 1 09-01-10 PRELIMINARY 2 09-23-10 REVISED PER DP,M 1 O REVISED PER I�- ,� 3 11-10-10 CITY COMMENTS 4 01-20-11 REVISED PER IANDSCgpING m 5 01-31-11 REVISED PER CIT' COMMENTS 6 03-02-11 REVISED. LANDSCAPE/� REVISED VAULT SCALE SCALE: 2 DETAILS , _t aETA1L5 , =5 Proposed ExcavaUon Replace base and finished surface equal to or create, thon existing as per agency standards and approval of Existlnq city, county or state inspector Gross Parkway Existing Cross Parkway Cement Slurry U Backfill DETAILS IE25952A POLE #422607E (PREUMINARY ADDRESS) 760 DIAMOND BARBLVD. DIAMOND BAR, CASTUS DETAILS .3 �I C.E.S. PROd. ,T38i®G.=TM81DD20 a0y�35 1/ ANTENNA SHROUD (24 W.x 60" TALL) MODE- %8116 19516-R21A a T ■ aMobile ' (OESIGNm BY Oifu]i5) J"I � ��J II I r- Get.more from life g o A N � n no -1/C m ¢ -.: B90' la 621'd +: e -x' ITR Pz rs PLANS PREPAREDBY: o 0 a a FPD'A�JSO� 66. ID' IY4) INpN nrme.q FleMn 11-,/Y fek G,k /�f cable anginaaring sarvicas 0 roawsm wmrn'wov°Ass I��w PRESCOTT COMMUNICATIONS INC. 10fi4D 6ePulveda BWd. BMAe i, Missbn IRs, G913A5 Y"3 1 ..." Phone No.: (01 010 9 6-23 5 2 FAnNo_ (01 010 9 01186 of c� I mmue I su: CONSULTING GROUP: o P D TOP VIEW Im3 n_ ,� ,a, m. IDum�ga.o aaer_wmm�� ' ACTUATOR �+R:.rv*d A'a' mewtl0.pele al ingMa be to pwil� vu'wvl`vAN •wa ,en6.t-m nm q:.t. w k N Wb ae+• Ws `"."pl, _ 9D SEQUOIA VECTOR DETAIL SCALE: ANTENNARADOME SCALE 2 ANTENNA SCALE TYPICAL FOUNDATION DETAIL SCALE: 4' U2ram r mmos I9c w.rs. N.rs. N.T.S.3 N.Is one vamweSidle 2no,lrme.wR2s,6 (2) I/2' -13x5 -1/Y HUBERaSUHNER - OMNI CPS Phone No.:(9491a,9-72D2 Fax Noz(949)7 }7201 1-1/2' DN OPENED 10 M. SSR COUPLINGS MODEL - SOA 901B/360/2/O/V N0.—DATE: DESCRRTION: —BY: �(4) DNC IDP MOUNT COUPLING LUIS M ON 1-1/4' OW ME END y (MOD-Sx) �T5 5'x5/B'x 11" (S1 }I CA IDNGTR-131 SIEEL ME ASN A-02 � GALL. PL x 15 50. CALL Sr3D. �� 1 09-01-10 PRELIMINARY BG TL 1, 45 -)IG ANTENNA (9.45 j BOLT CIRCLE FOR NSIENNA E --- A71ACHMBR (BY OTHERS)T„ o Ai1DY 061 UN Rfi' (8) 9mm PHESiRE`NIMG SHE - ME NEW A-421 ASN 1-36 MA 11 GA SPIAL STEEL 2 09-23-10 REVISED PER DRM MEAT 3' PITCH,TL .;. ASTM A-02 - 1-112' GM THU � .. TAPERED A -Um. ARM HOLE 4 NOLES EBWLLY 5P%B, ON 3 11-10-10 REVISED PER CITY COMMENTS VH TL NCO/ 8D63 (2) 1/2"-13.1-112' NMA MLLL 2-1/T A 16' OIA E.0 _ 194" e 4 01-20-11 REVISED PER VH VH SSR- HnI BOLTS W/ LOOKNASHERS - SCALE: SCALE: SCALE SCALE: SCALE: 9 LANDSCAPING n POLE TOP DETAIL 5 BRACKET ARM TO POLE CONNECTION 6 SECTION 7 BASE PLATE $ GPS N'T-s- VH N.T.S. N.T.6- N.T.S. N.T.S. REVISED PER VH 5 01-31-11 CITY COMMENTS SCE CONTRACTOR TO REPLACE EXISTING OCTAGONAL CONCRETE STREET UGHT Ps REVISED LANDSCAPE/ c9'-6" POLE 14422607E WITH A NEW 29'-6` ROUND CONCRETE 1w or GPs IW -IP- ADO ma GPs DW -11r. MI - 6 03-02-11 VAULT STREET LIGHT POLE WITH A 24" DIAx 66' TALL _ RP of STRUOE fss'-o'= nm1 To OF STRUCTURE ns'-': AOU _ AFTTETNNA SHROUD ON TOP. (T -MOBILE SITE POLE) 1AoTn a On Hr: (x' -ID': act) milRlu W K. De -Io' M j f NOTE NEW LIGHT POLE, ANTENNA RADOME AND GPS ANTENNA °ANNA RAD cENNn hY-65: RCCA Pao ENIEh l3z'-6 s'L uz1 SHOULD BE PAINTED TO MATCH EXSTING STREET LIGHT POLES. lCP M PMVB ITR maw (29'-fi AGI.1 ,fIP of PoIFJBDIIOY Or aN1FHNi 429'-6" PLL! D. SITE INFORMATION: r SCE CONTRACTOR TO REP LACE - ;i EXISTING 29'-6" OCTAGONAL CONCRETE STREETLIGHT - IE25952A a POLE #44226D7E WITH A NEW 29•-6" ROUND CONCRETE STREET UGHT POLE WITH A 24" OIA.x 66' TALL ANTENNA SHROUD ON TOP. (T -MOBILE STE POLE) - SCE MATERIAL CODE _ CODE 0040-01244 POLE #422607E SCE MATERIAL CODE #040-01244 NOTE: NEW LIGHT POLE, ANTENNA RADOMEAND GPS ANTENNA (PRELIMINARY AeeREss) d 7 CODE ` SHOULD BE PAINTED TO MATCH EXISTING STREET LIGHT POLES. NMI T60DIAMOND RBLVO. _hi LUD PROPERtt ONE ONAIOND BAR, DBAR,CCA 91785 • / PROPOSED RLH PEDESTAL (IB"x3D'xs0') CONCRETE SIDEWALK PROPERTY LINE STAMP: _ )/ " \1 r PROPOSED RLH (TYPE 0�) .- AREA 5.5' FROM 8` TROM CURBEACE sPEEO \ PEDESTAL (24 x36"x36") -- EDGE OF DIRT PARKWAY UMIT PROPOSED VENT STACKS TO CDRBFACE - FPOSED VENT STACK .xq. f j (2-12.5" Gk. x 34" TALL) 1 Z 5 EIA. x J4 ALL) •/ n.0' U.O. " w'q •� MICAL METER SMrTPOLDERRR , e Tom\ - -'" k A - _ 15 I /f , PROPOSED RLH V / " PEDESTAL(IB"x30"x50') wyv��M�N fT�✓ • jr v Y f J PROPOSED RILH(TYPE OJ) _ _ ` _ . EDESTAL (24"24"x36"x36') . ri - ...j GIRT P KW _ �. sr - DIAMOND BAR BL 0 ; o � ._ - • "• p x fiHEETTITLE `I *( ,� •.. �F MICROCELL - 2-9' T-M091LE COMM. 4r'MOBIL /\ DIRT 2 $6' l 5FROM AU 577 1 VAULT (TIdAS INSiB0VAULT)ARFA ELEVATIONS &2 PROPOSED MICPOCELL VAULT 2 B B° (7 ...�I 7 2'x4'_,0 xB-,O-d �5., 1 2' T -MO ICE TELCO 6 6, ( EDCE OF ,IDEWALK 10 =ROPFRY LINE. ®, r� Si!' I ''A.� EQUIPMENT DETAILS (-MA'S INSIDE VAULT) ` . I 1 1-2" -1 MOBILE Pw,, 22 IT SHEET NOMBER: 46 ! 14• A-4 ELEVATION - LOOKING EAST SCALE: 10 ELEVATION - LOOr�NG NORTH SCA, : -,-=z 11 C.E.S.PROd.438720-i6 DWG.$TMB10029 T a sMobile •a Get more from life _ PLANS PREPARED SY: cable engineering Y Serytoss PRESCOTT COMMUNICATIONS INC. 1040 Sep a" DNa. suite 1. Mission Hh, C 51346 Phone No.: I61B]8983362 Fax NP.: I61B)096A166 CONSULTING GROUP: tkQUOIAA ANN,. - Y TOP 6 CPS ] Gs TOP OF S f -21)'t tll CASMS Mev..W.Su=NP--(M)7a PhM200 aw No.:(949)417202 263I]6'-1 _ i r ANIEHNI m M nP'-10" nGU !1I uD6NN4 FA0 c°'"rs n]�s-- 1 MP aP.r6Dsa irDlT�a a �l a s'F° R - ire OF15Ps'-0'6 wL1 9NIe71N4w 1P NL Nf- (31'-t0'4 .G1.) _u+lOau wn attrzx Is'-H6'l call DIP 17 P fNY W WiEM1A ]5-6 A N0. —GATE —DESCRIPTION: 1 09-01-10 —B7: PRELIMINARY SG PTL 2 09-23-10 - REVISED PER DRM MA R; SCE CONTRACTORTO REPLACETL EXISTING 29-6" OCTAGONAL CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE #'4422607E WITH A NEW 29'-6' ROUND CONCRETE � r STREET LIGHT POLE WITH A 24° DW.x 66^ TALL ^._ ANTENNA SHROUD ON TOP. (T -MOBILE SITE PDL) - NOTE: NEW LIGHT POLE, ANTENNA RADOME AND GPS ANTENNA SHOULD BE PAINTED TO MATCH IXI57ING STREET UGHT POLES. c SCE MATERIAL CODE CODE 8040-01244 e' --_ m - SCE CONTRACTOR TO REPLACE EXISTING 29•-6' OCTAGONAL CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE n44226fi7E WITH A NEW. 29'-6' ROUND CONCRETE STREti LIGHT POLE WITH A 24" DIA.x 66 TALL .ANTENNA SHROUD ON TOP. (T -MOBILE SITE POLE) NOTE NEW LIGHT POLE, ANTENNA RADOME AND GPS ANTENNA SHOULD BE PAINTED TO MATCH EXISTING STREET LIGHT POLES 3 t1-10'10 REVISED PER CITY coI, ENTS RP � Tt 4 01-20-11 REVISED PER LANDSCAPING m n 5 01-31-11CITY REVISED PEP, COMMENTS :- PROPOSED RLH (TYPE 07) PEDESTAL (24'x36 -x36') PROPOSED RLH PEDESTAL (111"x30"x50") - - PROPERTI'-LINE PROPERTY UNE ) 8' FROM CUP,BFACE.. - N ` °Ln1"@ r 6 03-02-11 REVISED LANDSCAPE/ REVISED VAULT vH TL C 4-� Ila o.o. 1=1_ PROPOSED VENT STACKS (z-]zs' Dw. K 34' TALL) 03392 TMD CONCRETE SIDEWAL' AREA OF FROM EDGE OF DIRT PARKWAY MAn mcw`X TO CURBEACE.. xrm PPsu • PROP05ED VENT STACKS C2-12.5" DIA, x 34' TALL PROPOSED RLH PEDESTAL (IB"x30-x507 %\ PROPOSED RLH (MEP MEPDESTAL ° ue' n.a 4 m SITE INFORMAIIOk all ��� DESIAL(24x36^x36') ° IE25952A 1 - cr1POT ' `�1 ctwoF m 0111 arcwv' - _ cont. sm. - I MOND BAR BLVQ. POLE #422607E 41 ` y' g'. r r..r ly - 5 r•_- .." S. 2-4" T -MOBILE COMM,/ ' ;, ° S -x3` TO i�i� 2-4' T -MOBILE POWER METIER PROPOSED MICROCELL(PRELIMINARY S?? VAULT (T-2"x4'-10-x8'-)0^tl) (TMA'c INSIDE VAULT) 2-6" r - � DPARKWAY AREA 2.5 FROM Z� l EDGE OE SIDEWALK AODRE66I 760 DIAMOND BAR BLVD. DIAMOND BAR, C)917rs 6TAMk 2-4" T -MOBILE COMM S' -S• d��e* 1-2" T -MOLE TELCPROPOSED �� �7' ��a. 1 TO PROPERtt LINE. PROPOSED MICROCELL �� I-2" T -MOBILE PWR 577 VAULT 25 - (TMn'sxINSI�DE VRUL' 45 SHEET TIRE: ELEVATIONS snEETNmnBER: //P1���Cj ELEVATION -L00l:fNGlNEST sc;LE: 1 ELEVATION - LOOKING SOUTI4 scaLE:-x G ' m C.E.S. PRO11138720-t5 DWG.9MB10028 ANTENNA NUMBERING SCHEME (ONE QUADPOL ANTENNA PER SECTOR WITH DUAL TMAS) FRONT VIEW (FACING ANTENNAS) ALPHA SECTOR BETA SECTOR SINGLE LINE COAX N.T.S. �Tua%x-cslz-mu ms r--F-rveu-�Iwnu 6fills N n1110 nxm 0.VPLA � I I `RD uME MRMG NYITEB 1. CNN. CABLE BEND RADIUS Is 5.0 INCI I EXDTH£BW WEED GRIND CONNECRONS. S ALL ANT, CARIES INCWBING GPS ANT. CABLE SHALL NAVE (ABLE SHEIU) GRIND AT EOP (ANT. AWA) AND AT BOTTOM IN MICROCEIL CABINET. 4. INSAATE ME MOM ARMS. i ANTENNA CABLE SHOULD SH411 BE GROUNDED AT THE TOP AND BOTTOM OF THE VERTEX RMI. THE ANTENI CABLE SHIELD SHALL BE 3DNDE0 TO A COPPER MIS AT THE LOIYEW09 POINT OF A VERTICAL RUN. S. GPS ANTENNA LOCATION SHOULD MAAMIIE R'S SEPAf SIMRL 7A- D A_ GBIEi TO MURK M 1 SCALE 2 ANTENNA WIRE MAGRAM N.Ts. GPSSURVEYIA LA11PUDEo RF SYSTEM SCHEDULE LOPCITU,E- SEICi�R AZIMUTH NUMBER OF ANTENNA MWEL N0. EON�WEN�UMPER J�MZEER FUE WH COV SIZE pryT��yp p DANTENNCENTEA � OF COAX A iP 11 1 TMBXX-6516-R2M N/A N/A - 7/8' 1 N/A - 4 B 1 230' 1 DdEXX-6516-R2M N/A N/A - 7/8' N/A I- But BNE RiuE w is PEO RFL REO YRil2 u -Tx aEn/RED/NMIE'_TXAIX GPSSURVEYIA LA11PUDEo 31 00 38.84" N LOPCITU,E- 07 i 48' 27. 1 ' W ANTENNA COLOR CODES 3 1 RF CONFIGURATION - FG -OR 'C SEC -OR "A" OLD El -Ix I2.UE/BHR NEW AI -TX tED/VMNE AI-TA/qX B:UE &UE RWEG RED H AI -KK REO/PURI5£ Al-tt But BNE RiuE w is PEO RFL REO YRil2 u -Tx aEn/RED/NMIE'_TXAIX &1-tt CG-% RID FED ryHIIEPYR➢D A2 -R% ReD/PE➢/PORPIE @. ftUE.WE &LE BINE 6WE BINE '. USED BORR-SYNC wEs PED 0L Rm PF➢ WHI BILE HUE &LE &UE BINE ttLE HIE BLUE m m m m m rn M_u fd-I% BE -RX GA/DN/wf&lE Rm AtD RfD ROI IFO YM m m m m 1Tl Ya YEL MMR GN LN AG-% LII NNIIE REL AID flM RLL IE➢ RFB USED FOR T6-51NC MTES A7-T%/RX GM FM flm PID R® Pm Rm F&D FI USED WR R-Sn& %T5 IR-UjRX RED RED RED RED I PEO I RED I REO If® - ANTENNA COLOR CODES 3 1 RF CONFIGURATION FG -OR 'C OLD NEW El -Ix I2.UE/BHR n-t%/RX NDE Mllr[v C1-P.x MME "PLP Ci -1% B:UE &UE RWEG C1 -TX HllE/RJIE/IMIE E2-T%/M HLE HLE RIP9F a -RX KNE/MUEPURnt CA -T% But BNE RiuE w is Y6 m y;A c L5 -l% 0 UE HUE BLUE &UE RLUE RN &1-tt CG-% EWE 3YE.WE QLUE 6WE 9WE USED MR M -SYNC YH5 a-1%/NR @. ftUE.WE &LE BINE 6WE BINE '. USED BORR-SYNC wEs Ce_u/Fx BILE HUE &LE &UE BINE ttLE HIE BLUE ANTENNA COLOR CODES 3 1 RF CONFIGURATION N.T.S. T • Mobile a Get more from life I ng an engineering SBrurfc 5 PRESCOTT COMMUNICATIONS INC. 10640 SepVl-1 BNd SUM i. Mission HBs, CA91345 PNone Na.: (01.109&2352 Fu Nd (010)09&9186 IP ULTINGGROW: nR�tk0lU01A Y.A�T � IMSneOVenueSuNePOOII GSWIII wne No.:(949)4197"2 FR%No: (949P53]M13 MD. —DATE: DESCRIPTION: —B 1 09-01-10 PRELIMINARY 2 09-23-10 REVISED PER DRM REVISED PER 3 11-1G-10 CITY COMMENTS REVISED PER 4 01-20-17 LANDSCAPING REVISED PER 5 01-31-11 CITY COMMENTS 4REVISED LANDSCAPE/- 6 03-02-11 REVISED VAULT SITE INFORMATION: IE25952A POLE #422607E FREUMINARYADDRESST 76O DIAMOND BARBLVD. DIAMOND BAR CAs1]65- ��e SHEETTnIE: RF INFORMATION SHEET NUMBER: IGLE: C fur ! l H T.S. 1 5 C.E.S. PROJ. #38720.15 DWG.#WBIGD28 SECTOR OLD NEW OLD DI-TX/RX NEW m vuvL YEUwNrc m -Tx 61-7% Ctl/N'FeiE &-I%/R% yu/tIl/ n I... CN MM Y6 m y;A c Yp/Yp/PUP.Pf£ M -.W' LM/PURPI£ &1-tt 1EL YEL YFL `dWHIR GY GY Gu wH az-Ts 6WWAMNE Rz-ttMx DR -X cu GM vMi m m m m m rn m TG-,uC RES BE -RX GA/DN/wf&lE P Tz m m m m 1Tl Ya YEL MMR GN LN Gu LII NNIIE YFL 1F1 YEL m Y. YM Y m R. y5 -T% GM FM GY GY GY B6-% - GM GN CN R4 CY CN YMIIEPJ,Rq£ Igp Fpq 1fi5Y1q 511ES g]-T3/R% GM GM GY GY GN GY GN MAfRR 16F➢ NP 1G -SYNC `RFS BS -T% F.N G4 GN CN GM CY LN LM Ck N.T.S. T • Mobile a Get more from life I ng an engineering SBrurfc 5 PRESCOTT COMMUNICATIONS INC. 10640 SepVl-1 BNd SUM i. Mission HBs, CA91345 PNone Na.: (01.109&2352 Fu Nd (010)09&9186 IP ULTINGGROW: nR�tk0lU01A Y.A�T � IMSneOVenueSuNePOOII GSWIII wne No.:(949)4197"2 FR%No: (949P53]M13 MD. —DATE: DESCRIPTION: —B 1 09-01-10 PRELIMINARY 2 09-23-10 REVISED PER DRM REVISED PER 3 11-1G-10 CITY COMMENTS REVISED PER 4 01-20-17 LANDSCAPING REVISED PER 5 01-31-11 CITY COMMENTS 4REVISED LANDSCAPE/- 6 03-02-11 REVISED VAULT SITE INFORMATION: IE25952A POLE #422607E FREUMINARYADDRESST 76O DIAMOND BARBLVD. DIAMOND BAR CAs1]65- ��e SHEETTnIE: RF INFORMATION SHEET NUMBER: IGLE: C fur ! l H T.S. 1 5 C.E.S. PROJ. #38720.15 DWG.#WBIGD28 SECTOR '0" OLD NEW YEL/ow DI-TX/RX m vuvL YEUwNrc m -Tx m 1a rH R yu/tIl/ n I... W --/R% Y6 m y;A c Yp/Yp/PUP.Pf£ O TX 1EL YEL YFL `dWHIR m-tt m 1n m m 1a WNWE DR -X m m m m m rn m TG-,uC RES o7-TX/Rx m m m m 1Tl Ya YEL MMR 'GsR 5R6 0.-- Rx YFL 1F1 YEL m Y. YM Y m R. N.T.S. T • Mobile a Get more from life I ng an engineering SBrurfc 5 PRESCOTT COMMUNICATIONS INC. 10640 SepVl-1 BNd SUM i. Mission HBs, CA91345 PNone Na.: (01.109&2352 Fu Nd (010)09&9186 IP ULTINGGROW: nR�tk0lU01A Y.A�T � IMSneOVenueSuNePOOII GSWIII wne No.:(949)4197"2 FR%No: (949P53]M13 MD. —DATE: DESCRIPTION: —B 1 09-01-10 PRELIMINARY 2 09-23-10 REVISED PER DRM REVISED PER 3 11-1G-10 CITY COMMENTS REVISED PER 4 01-20-17 LANDSCAPING REVISED PER 5 01-31-11 CITY COMMENTS 4REVISED LANDSCAPE/- 6 03-02-11 REVISED VAULT SITE INFORMATION: IE25952A POLE #422607E FREUMINARYADDRESST 76O DIAMOND BARBLVD. DIAMOND BAR CAs1]65- ��e SHEETTnIE: RF INFORMATION SHEET NUMBER: IGLE: C fur ! l H T.S. 1 5 C.E.S. PROJ. #38720.15 DWG.#WBIGD28 i D D MICROCELL 577 WITH 7 SUMP PUMP INTERIOR ELEVATION "A" INTERIOR ELEVATION "B" INTERIOR ELEVATION "C" INTERIOR ELEVATION "b" FLOOR PLAN 6H16�INR�a[9/MR/91S! RBI a{9tff I 1 9ryW 10YIPx2("Gq P 1 MNM WON9he9LhY59R�talbxlY9lCba a z rrtwW. 9ylx+amwzzra/ws s / �.er ais.m.."mmalamv e 1 s.,Plwm amxb9ro 1 EAVWfar iY.VA64 e / dmimwr .os /mmmv, s/y.w.a9wp w®19ae 19 / S}e#fn6ub .1lwaMmWM SCALE: T a aMobile III - Get more frorn life cabie V engin angfneerfng aamices PRESCOTT COMMUNICATIONS INC. 10640 SepuWatla Blvd Sidle 1, Nl6sbn HBs. CA 91946 PFmeNo.: (81890-2951 Fex11o.: (818j69&9186 tiauIAOsm w�s. iac One Venture B 720200F Nana..: )7 Plwne Na 19491919-T202 Fax Na.: (0(9715&]P9 1 109-01-101 PRELIMINARY 0 _ 09-23-10 REVISED PER DRM - 80 TL 3 11-10-10 REVISED PER C7ry COMMENTS P VH 4 01-20-11 REVISED PER LANDSCAPING VH m TL 5 Di -31-11 REVISED PER rl1 r(1MMFNTC VH p 6 1 03-02-11 I - REVISED VAULT IE25952A POLE #422607E (PRELIMINARY ADDRESS) 760 DIAMOND BARBLVD. DIAMOND BAR CA9170 P�rL��M�NPR� C® MICROCELL 577 INTERIOR ELEVATION DETAILS C.E.G. PROJ. #387 20.,`.7M610D28 AIR VENTING 125 SQ. INCHES MINIMUM OPEN AREA 42" SEE DETAIL "A" 34" 012.5" TOP CAP INSTALLED ON VENT 10"0 OPENING \ UNDER CAP S,S. NO. 14x1 ONE WAY ROUND HEAD SHEET METAL SCREWS (4x) 1 5" 2.5" 2.5" i 2s' 12.5" 2.5", - 1 i i I 2.5" 7n — SMOOTH AREA FOR LABELS GRADE Ii 10" LOUVERED VENT PART #VENT10 24.5" AIR VENT 4 EACH LEVEL (24x) SEE DETAIL 7" WIDE ALL - AROUND SMOOTH AREA FOR LABELS 010" SCH. SILICON SEALANT — 40 PVC BETWEEN PVC AND PIPE POLYETHELENEALL AROUND 10"0 ADAPTER SC H. 40 PVC TO SEWER PIPE SIZE (ADAPTER NOT GLUED TO PVC PIPE) SMOOTH C SURFACE / ALL AROUND FOR NEW !NSTALLATIONS VENT HASCAPSINSTALLED T • -Mobile •� Get more from life cable engineering I" an"Ices PRESCOTT COMMUNICATIONS INC. 10040 SWUW" BWE. Sub 1. Mls 1®a, G&91045 P aw(818)B9 2052 Fax No.:(01"N-9180 VENTS AIR VENTING DETAIL i 2.125" 1 T r.25" 1 i I I I I I f I I 111 25" I I .875" 1 AIR VENTS DETAIL "A" www.caiduct.com 2522 LEE AVE., S. EL MONTE, CA 91733 626.575.3135 FAX 626.575.2677 CONSULTMGGROUP: 41 Dna Van1aE�a7�3 S"Il PFnaN":(949)419-) 1 09-01-10 PRELIMINARY TL 6 AA 2 09-23-10 REVISED PER DP.M BG TL RP REVISED PER VN 3 11-10-10 .CITY COMMENTS a VN REVISED PER yN 4 01-20-11 LANDSCAPING s n VR REVISED PER VH 5 01-31-11 CITY COMMENTS BrM REVISED LANDSCAPE/ 5 03-02-11 REVISED VAULT IE25952A POLE #422607E (PRELIMINARY ADDRESS) 760 DIAMOND BAR BLVD. DIAMONDBAR,CA9179 VENT DETA S EDISON MATERIA!_ CODE: 665-03260 - s�a C.E.S.PR01'd38720=15 DVJG.::7R6919923 VENT DETAILS TYPICAL PEDESTAL MOUNTING DETAIL 3 �SLPFlIEDEOLTS YNTH. BASE gLTERN' 4NLHIX2 BOLrS ASS REQUIRED BOLT INSTA-1APON USE 1/r-13 SOUS SINGLE METER SERVICE PEDESTAL TYPICAL APPLICATIONS INCLUDE HIGHWAY, STREET LIGHTING AND SIGNAL CIRCUITS. STANDARD FEATURES METER SOCKET VWTH TEST BLOCKS 4JAW STANDARD VOLTAGE 120/240VAG 1 PHASE 3 WIRE AVAILABLE WITH ALL METERED CIRCUITS OR MET, REO AND UNMETERED CIRCUITS SEPARATE DEAD FRONTS FOR BREAKERS AND COMPONENTS PHOTOELECTRIC SOCKET, RELAYS AND TEST SWITCH AS REQUIRED PER JOB SPECIFICATIONS 2 3/6' . 50" ONE OOLVNd2ETl IRON FIFE FOR L1MHW&TIF MOUNTING 50' IN 16' DEEP . IY DM. CONCRETE FORUM. SELF LOCA RECEIVED & COVER SECURITY SYSTEM RULE MOUI OF E❑ MB SPE OT AWL BE AGMEVEO BY POURING OR PIAONG CORCREIE OA COMRAFTED DWT AROUND EASE SECDON TO WITHIN I OF TOP OF BASE GROUND CUSTOME H DI T M sMobile.- Get more from lifer cable angfn Wsng/nerWsring SCrWeea PRESCOTT COMMUNICATIONS INC. 10640 Bapulvetla BNd. Su9e 1, Mlssim FiOz. CA91395 PBone Nn.: (010)890-2352 FmL NO. 1018)09&9106 CONSUMING GROUP: TOR SEQUOIA tOL91oMSxr swNP FL One VF m Su9e ROD, IMne.CA 9 8 Phan NDN(9N91419-T2O2 FMNo.:tS49p53-TXM 200 AMP MYERS ELECTRICAL METER PEDESTAL SCALE: 200 AMP MYERS ELECTRICAL METER PEDESTAL scALE. RLH (TYPE OTj PEDESTAL scA�. 2 3 N.T.S. NT.S. (ISOMETRIC VIEW) N.T.S. PLACE #4 REBAR t72" ON CENTER MA%. (GRID) AFTER CONDUIT INSTALLATION. NO REINFORCING - STEEL TO COME IN CONTACT WITH SOIL � 24 V 2. 21 I 2" 6NIERIORVIEW REAR DANCING DETAIL. COVER REIAOVED FOR EASE DETAL SEE MYERS CATALOG. MYFRSPOWER PROO11CTb ffrOPAnwM s+Olzw PLq WRNGFKPNi 6 tril2m V— P 3 W 'M ellvs rRMn N� aat xc n Lr141 ■ lLnn+x`L ❑ WiflF ❑Pxn,PHr ❑ G11®l FsnwNEP�Nrn t�YEE ❑ xP iwa ❑ o wWN� ❑ axGFw �❑ ❑ M o MYERS QRCUR OIRECTOIRTp will A�ZiR� PMVEq PflOnIKFS YUC rss ERASgBON, eogducA me Pae ml 2 MEwMlG.wlm Wool Q. VIL IPXP£ zWWE 3W IMPs VM1XM EE MPF BPEN3LNNOc' INDUSTRIAL CONTROLSURABLE ONLY FOR NSE AS SERVICE EOUIFWENO ,WNPWOF E REVISED PER DRM BG TL 3 11-10-10 SOGETAGPNPz ®uRNC45 .P s VH TL UDUTYT604INATPN 01-20-11 SECTION '"`„VH VH ,En 5 YA N REVISED PER CITY COMMENTS WmEmNx�.PN„UP . 6� cawNENruN,,..Grwuxn 03-02-11 REVISED LANDSCAPE/ REVISED VAULT JB VH n 1 vuUN e• -{aim � � awwnrn1°mxn�ErnL c`�'N.. uwL TueFix£ss uPr� w6xGmrvm wEONzas.1 e LNEVfMLP9.WESWmPc AOtaM fEAb POa T6rMvasESMY mmrcnmNaxTlNu-PN.. rnNxE�lwuoanam.rva+ zaezwu.N,EOror,e LmvTsme+Imr wx Wrn�umumaP,u`R`RV" - N:rmlwi.u- - OX6PCANPN�IY1–t..WGaW iTCFN+GTYrnEA �FVwPEfiT�91E�G MYERS o FRONT %NNLE 'A" ' . V4' 2° 10° 10' 2" 4° L CRAOE LEVEL . PROFILE 'A" �L 21' 2" G5° 8.5' 2" 4" GRADE LEVEL I �Fi, PROFILE 'B" L= ALE:C 200 AMP MYERS ELECTRICAL METER PEDESTAL CONCRETE PAD SN.r s. 6 g d 8° G a dT a 1 09-01-10 PRELIMINARY - BG 2 09-23-10 REVISED PER DRM BG TL 3 11-10-10 REVISED PER CITY COMMENTS .P s VH TL 4 01-20-11 REVISED PER LANDSCAPING '"`„VH VH TL 5 01-31-t1 REVISED PER CITY COMMENTS VH 6 03-02-11 REVISED LANDSCAPE/ REVISED VAULT JB VH IE25952A POLE #422607E (PREUMINARYAODRESS) TB0 DIAMOND BARBLVO. DIAMOND BAR U91765 POWER PEDESTAL DE Il' AUR SHEET k0M0ER 5/Rx a" NCH DICT aLki n Doug NUAL .wcu eDrs - Ew c: •I F: F: R S ELECTRICAL METER PEDESTAL SCALE:200 AMP MYERS ELECTRICAL .15 AMP WITH GENERATOR PLUG) 4 METER PEDESTAL (WIRE DIAGRAM) L�. J TYPICAL ANCHOR @tllT DETAIL SCAT E., S 7 C.E.S. PROD. 838728Dtn'c. h-MBtooza TYPICAL EXTERNAL VAULT GROUNDING NOTES: 1. ALL STRANDED GROUND WIRE TO BE GREEN JACKETED. GROUND SCHEME MAY VARY DUE TO SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS. s GROUND LINE I-WAY RW COPPER -J S' LFNMH FDR ANEMIAS NOTES: 1. DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC 2. PLACE GROUND WIRE CLOSE TO CURB CURB gW1A 3 Xt]L x e' w1pa 1 mm IND z -M1 Wfl➢ W NYS®DN we TOP VIEW IM .ol.N., GROUND TEST WELL DETAIL SIDE VIEW \ i 3N. - \ )N. HARDWOOD A ° ° N.T.S. I. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM TEST TO DETERMINE GROUND RESISTANCE. 2. IF RESISTANCE EXCEEDS 5 OHMS ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE, FROM TEST RESULTS, NUMBER OF RODS REQUIRED. .. FINISHED GRADE T- \n45i r2 V 30" 3110" i CADWELD GROUNDING Y 0 5/B -TI X 1" HHCS BOLTS, NEWTON INSTRUMENT CO. CAT. NO. 3012-1 OR EQUAL 5/8"0 x ID' INSULATORS SHALL BE INSTALLED COPPERGLAD 5/8-11 NUT STEEL GROUND ROD 2 1 GROUND ROD DETAIL N.T.5. M PARTS LIST A �OPPER GROUND BAR, USE STYLE T GTI TELECOM, INC- ACNAL GROUND flAR SIZE WILL VARY BASED ON NUMBER F GROUND CONNECTIONS B 5/8" LOCK WASHERS, NEWTON INSTRUMENT CO. CAT. N0. 3015-8 OR EQUAL C WALL MOUNTING BRACKET NEWTON INSTRUMENT CO. CAT. NO. A-6056 OR EQUAL 0 5/B -TI X 1" HHCS BOLTS, NEWTON INSTRUMENT CO. CAT. NO. 3012-1 OR EQUAL E INSULATORS SHALL BE INSTALLED F 5/8-11 NUT TYPICAL WOOD POLE GROUNDING DETAIL Sc'N.T.SE- ¢ I TYPICAL GROUND BAR - TT.s. J NOTES: I. GO NOT INSTALL COAX GROUND KIT AT A BEND AND ALWAYS DIRECT GROUND WIRE DOWN TO GROUND BEND. 2. GROUNDING KF! SHALL BE TYPE AND PART NUMBER AS SUPPUED OR RECOMMENDED BY COAX MANUFACTURER. - 3. WEATHER PROORNIG SHALL BE TWO- PARI TAPE KIT. COLD SHRINK SPALL MOT EE USED. CONNECTION OF COAX GROUND KIT TO A14TENNACOAX a 0 ANTENNA COAX I --it' TO 24" `o WEATHER,-PROOFINGKIT (SEE NOTE #3) COAX GROUND KIT— #6 AWG STRANDED COPPER GROU140 .IRE (GROUNDED TO GROUND EAR) - (SEE NOTES 1 & 2) NOTES: I. CRIMP (COMPRESSION) TYPE TWD -HOLE BOLTED TONGUE CONNECTORS SHALL BE USED TO TERMINATE STRANDED GROUNDING CONDUCTORS. THE CONNECTORS SHALL BE TIN PLATED COPPER, LONG BARREL LUG, AND SHALL BE USED FOR THEIR INTENDED USE BY AN NRR. NOTE: TIN PLATED ALUMINUM CONNECTORS INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE DATE OF THIS STANDARD OR CONNECTORS THAT ARE PART OF AN APPROVED PRODUCT ARE ACCEPTABLE. 2- CRIMP TYPE CONNECTORS USED ON SOLID CONDUCTORS MUST BE LISTED BY AN NRTL FOR USE ON SOUD CONDUCTORS, AND MUST BE CRIMPED WITH THE DIES SPECIFIED BY THE MANUFACTURER OF THE CONNECTOR. USE .A FYDRN-UC CRIMPING TOOL 3. TWO -HOLE BOLTED TONGUE CONNECTORS SHALL BE USED. WIRES SHALL BE INSERTED THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE UJG. ENSURE COAX OUTER INSULATION IS SNUG TO LUG BARREL_ PROVIDE AN ANTIOXIDE COMPOUND ON THE CONDUCTOR BEFORE CRIMPING (NO 6R). INSTALL A TRANSPARENT HEAT SHRINK INSULATING TUBE ALONG THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE CRMP 4. USE #6 AWG STRANDED -THOMAS & BE -,,S 455578 OR EQUIVALENT 5. Lis', 2 AWG STRANDED-TROMAS & SETTS 935306 OR EQUIVALENT. 6 I 2 -HOLE LB GROUNDING LUG N.T.Q. T a •Mobile Get more from lifer Y cable eng/naaring sa"iaCS PRESCOTT COMMUNICATIONS INC. 10640 SWds SMI. Sulk 1, Ml9 HIM, CA 9130.5 Phone N°.: (010)8982352 Fax No.: (816)099-9106 SEQUOIA Derin�Aa+r s<xwus, me One Vw01re 6WIe 200, OrinN, G92618 Piwne Na.: (9W7419-7202 Fix Na.: (949)]S*T1113 1 109-01-10 1 PRELIMINARY 2 109-23-10 1 REVISED PER GERM 3 tt-10-10 REVISED PER CITY COMMENTS L VR REVISED PER VH 4 01 -20 -it LANDSCAPING 5 1 01-31-11 6 103-02-111 REVISED VAULT IE25952A POLE #422607E (PREUMINARY ADDRESS) 766INAMONDBARBLVD. DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 GROUNDING DETAILS SHEET NUMBER CALF GA NTS 7 C.E.S. PROJ. 0872M5 DWG4TMB1B025 L - 11 1 'FY ei!J'�1I= a� A �d< i % - TY i IJ1Fcr, :� !'.:.� /.�",-=.r..-.s-.P-t ^i.�.ti F:� _.:>ti C. :.'t %�. :kY�,j Ate:.''• �. i-. �.-. . T - wMobile,- Get more from life engineering services PRESCOTT COMMUNICATIONS INC. 1004008a BNA.31, MBabn 118s, DA91345 Phone Noa.:.: (8j (010)098-235522 Fmk No.: (01a)09&0108 tEQUOIA iPPNHFIIT FANCES BIG O—V.W. SU9e 200, imInd M 92618 Phone No.: 1949141&7202 Fax No..PS)75 Ms 5 101-31-11 6 1 03-02-111 REVISED VAULT IE25952A POLE #422607E (PMUMINMYMORB05) 160DIAMOND MRBLM DIAMOND BAR, CA91765 p�E�1M�NpR� C9 TRENCH SHIELD & TRENCH SHORING NOTES SHEUNUMBER 4```_) ®H l C.E.S. PROJ.#3072N15 OWG.#1MBI%28 s. 66 n ED PER DRM BG IL WCITyELIMINARY ISED PER COMMENTS RP Q VHILISED PER °""`�DSCAPING 5 101-31-11 6 1 03-02-111 REVISED VAULT IE25952A POLE #422607E (PMUMINMYMORB05) 160DIAMOND MRBLM DIAMOND BAR, CA91765 p�E�1M�NpR� C9 TRENCH SHIELD & TRENCH SHORING NOTES SHEUNUMBER 4```_) ®H l C.E.S. PROJ.#3072N15 OWG.#1MBI%28 PRlfl \/IRA/ i SIUL VILW SHIELD CONNECTION TRENCH SHORING DETAILS 'A" x 4" EXTRA STRONG 'IPE STUBS WELDED "O SHIELD END WITH /2' FILLET ALL AROUND. /4° x11" GRADE 5 BOLT 2'-G" MIN. TO 14'-0' MAX TRENCH SHIELD MODEL #TS 1355 8' HIGH x 14' LONG x 15' MAX WIDTH -FLEX-SHIELD TRENCH BOXES by "TRENCH SHORING" OR EQUIVALENT n TRENCH BOX DETAILS NOT TO SCALE T m •Mobile •- Get more from life 'LANS PREPARED SY: V cable engin®sting services PRESCOTT COMMUNICATIONS INC. 10640S ... W". Bbd S.Kl 1. MPM.e HIM, CA 81395 Phom Na: (818)09 352 Fu NP: (B18)B90A186 ta,rEr, 0,U01A snv>uc uie Ona VenWn BuHe 200, Iry ,cAmu Phnne No.:(949)419-7202 F.No.:(949)75 nD3 1 09-01-10 PRELIMINARY 2 09-23-10 REVISED PER OP.M REVISED PER 3 11-10-10 CITY COMMENTS 4 01-20-11 REVISED PER LANDSCAPING 5 01-31-11 REVISED PER CITY COMMENTS REVISED LANDSCAPI 6 D3-02-17 REVISED VAULT IE25952A POLE #422607E (PREUMINARYADORESS) 760 DIAMOND RARBLVD. DIAMOND RAR, CA91768 SHEET TIRE TRENCH SHORING DETAILS SHEET NUMBER scale SH•2 1 C.E.S. PROD. 839720-15 OWG.8T45819928 7.5. � Tom=. i �I1�al� d= 1I S31.,W, ___ — § I _ _ —__8E I I �mmnsnr�� ww I � I I - a� I ia1WN $I I =I IEbb I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ?ROE9(IY LYE 3W8f 7� —1117-117 I -IE I Viewing Deck Section A e"•,=.,M.-,'a An Italian Revival Custom Home The Nguyen Residence 3010 Wagon Train, The Country Estates, Diamond Bar, California n=i wL='7� IL n—m ;IU71'llIhG�-II u n nc 11'� —II =1= �=5 L=ir— —,R=dll,IL=IL ILi T. =Or=1L —1L=_ it —J1= =ll=1 — Preliminary Site Plan F,•.,n� �,�„ 6xw6mmM1 e.mml. w.. w.fissm wR SUstE 3m,1 Nbn TMS MWL iW. ]M T.HU "t M.M1 wr6aruiy ..nxe, fgM1 1.W119 mR UnaN PortArs 1.611W apR imoorvm 8P— TJi Fw$Xnl �615]I fyft vmp+ nwlrmcaw 1z% MUWCax+M b% ]uauMm... nsswi.rveMw.. n, fMlfkaPYn k2 s.mmrmrrs ns ronw� as RIa6 kT Ti- wm� L3 Cm6uv0.n L§hY Ld eg i_s A-1 ME ARMTEME za15 aWu Fw... Sub41o] mv.w.,..ouromMxstt IN9EI Wi.F]114f.33A An Italian Revival Custom Home The Nguyen Residence 110 Wagon Train, The Country Estates, Diamond Bar, California tiw.F a.m p.l misae.wsiw im wl Rd9JAp 1.= Wl Gvn,bl�m4CnvY im WL M., V � .1P(HI(EL11�E u•�=n.,..�ar�mm, szuz An Italian Revival Custom Home The Nquven Residence 3010 Wagon Train, The Second Floor Plan 14$y teyy w o:m 2. tee. 33'S}�'- 'Y}.1p lea L 'd PS 2d 'Y Si ii 1'S IPhT T-11' I4i <" Y'2y" Md1j' % SO 2d .1� F"R" 98 RY ti S+xi 5 A M1 / \ BaVfl \�Mml�mfn av /' "\ nC. Y Y Ili' -i BeM2 \ r \ / II I \ I Betlman2 i Minter \ J . \ I MM.0 I 56vlhl , Mehl Het ------- _____t___ EW \ OWTO BaEl 3 YY +'Y 'd ZS II II II II 11 1 a w Yy2 e@4' YY Yom• Y - - 12dij^ UY 1PY 314 ]S.y• I' r 11 -• An Italian Revival Custom Home The Nquven Residence 3010 Wagon Train, The Second Floor Plan IN SmWF ,, ".1 wn w o:m 2. tee. A-3 IN w ]s15 NiWku+4.5dehox GIIx Nfa.. xsMavN69xfitfi 'iMiN 6Ml.F]IIN533ID Right Elevationy,�.,•� 00000 00 000t a, + a ' - � I' � ✓nom q�lY ,q,� ii Left Elevation - Pool Wing „s An Italian Revival Custom Home The Nguyen Residence 3010 Wagon Train, The Country Estates, Diamond Bar, Califomii Rear Elevation Pool Lett Elevation - Master Wing �.,..y,�-,•a IIIIIIIIII�I Right Elevation - Master Wing u„E>„r-.� An Italian Revival Custom Home The Nguyen Residence 110 Wagon Train, The Country Estates, Diamond Bar, California Rear Elevation A6 AN(HRE"E nswra e.on<-seas+az Giiahea ,F7t4a9E6n Left Elevation - Master Wing SUIS 8M, Right Elevation - Master Wing ,�_,•a An Italian Revival Custom Home The Nguyen Residence ML AID Wagon Train, The Country Estates, Diamond Bar, California Rear Elevation �.Mr-,•a A-6 xrsw6mM.a...smecoz [et,a Mva. [a1�oMa 9] 6M 1L9DIC F]IaR66➢A 2 WINDOW ELEVATION NO.1 RECESSED WINDOW HEAD 6 RECESSED WINDOWJAMS 3 WINDOW ELEVATION NO.2 O "'— 7 RECESSED WINDOW SILL OMAIN EAVE DETAIL =.m -'-v TYPICAL EAVE O TYPICAL RAKE 5 Roof and Window Details MUM An Italian Revival Custom Home The Nguyen Residence A-1 Ig 3010 Wagon Train, The Country Estates, Diamond Bar, California m °flP&Y"0IX101 eunncrnnE E915 RMNF/.mm.SWefl@. ps:a Neu.[aA:pmIV W636 1M9P1615.f 1:flMlldl GRADING GENERAL NOTES L .I"WATE 9INl HYSY YIX MMMwld 6H1 pnp uo Au AAA W W IS tuo+lm BY M aH 1 N1 ML4[wMG NM 9LHSN R26tlIWH rxsrA�zE 1 A tRbNGiPWII A NL Hl IlH49lY(HpMMIw IDI.VtIm'IW S 9BIISAI856x98 %MAR{NOIWIC SH II I..., II' MfNYRMA. X aver mt M HISR WVAWMR0.tlI . MEIBglC16A0PIbTM W HRR Ht siuxWl �Wlw{ 6¢Wfp AW /LL AVI remRaR Alxav wx AM ui AtlM Wrt Il AxAOIw NNRCRIE AFAva xx RNraMrIHHNHIwWXs a,•,HwouommWBmrARAxv: w M�arsP6u wR�i vw sm�uuWiW°mrmRc i°Hisu�°`v ilY ari`MEamm"�'`a WemwmL II. AV.V1 WA9m dPWLIH WSIHMfD BYXIS NO9HMN@S AW AYBOIW 6YMOIIN9E4'IW MW IL /LL WI591MLH WIDRd WMLWxOHG QOLMSr 0.9N NaM'Cw 11NlMY NIIER'OYNIIR6 CwH IL AMRIPANRIMRBN AWN161AllW I1M5 SV SIS AMUW 6rMTY. Il s PX£0916 M6IWKWHIAR Sw6 WM nW ORE9 NAMAS ¢M65 A91NRR AIMMWIWNM IS AOR H.WM WRAH O61RA 1AW YN[LYRP YLLSNMIONMEILL IMBMWeb6A1SA RN 9ql I1ImHRlWKNIH 9R1Rm BY MmSGifBA N0 NWMR N MYA'AF 9I MOIY. 10. Wbw NYWMM WH¢@A41w Ytli MtlN IS WtVMipISM5Y5 FIRi9A.VOpiM EAA'mf.W HHMSlHHWH Il. SGVAIIM Iw TAHl1YIT3 Nx HYJYH KH@IIAN[YYSINSIH W4Mw NN AaIDIRIN RiNC 9. M .M65 FMimf W PVdCC NaltalHS(AID WANbNAOIG RLL IA w�WseuwM NlvawR¢asysrH Yaom vmsoa4NNAFAAam Bauw WHNGerrxu I%F NAMVYA IYMbC MIN.1L.®MIMM N]LI-EMM-PA9R ®RRNVI LLV. IP H'm AVa6 � � w DME(NT .SYN RY MOM+AVH YM SCINF III S6 /OM1RW YN/bf wYL F#AVAPM WSIH f84Alw AW A®IEO N RMO BY MEIDSgS@A W 9. A"� HPA�IW'MA 9wlAWIImIXYi.0 9lR1GSNMOIY IMIQR All m[MtY 14 mf]W AIR LWI aMERM HMQ WMME M14PAIR6 HAIIILIQ6 NTPAKY9Wl H 6Am .49EC! N M p" E1b,FFR$NRWY 6 SY PYMAS MHMMH IMLL WWI4 W5r SAMMd BIMOM1®HE ]2 M.MSNB HH(CYw1"FiR �^�^ - m pA101 911ll HWEA PM)61I6 (AMYMflAY N9 Nl .SpMPQNA1p6 WRNW RW19aLL L SiRCM1Y NYW N R [RYHMMNNR ItFWIA'N BWMhR 4wlPG AAWVAIHNMWiY@/.'aANHtI�EIWLN NP AYMAHI Ai M.9RMIll MS X MN WMN VA'IH A9Wm wNS IXOPMCYSMSPS S1 HMWAF0. 3 R@I1A5IL1K mN OAN➢BIMOIY Hf1VR108N xLY RNtWWRR MM OI/AAYWM eeRsNlvlrs amw � wmA m wMmvAw�i aNa�"xBrtt rim r`eHAwMxI° vnw`Roa°MB"s"a P�NXRwbnWErimMHAc HR W vols wow xamNAu ommc MLnws ANYI W Hr xmx. "'NRmvi meas WravuRs arra Ar6W ao-mw Pmr-wN(M)IMwxMYMRH Y. WIMA4Rx 9WI. mRY NIN MVIIWEA AOH whR �IYBHmWlPB.MRRR MWLO.IYS.VO M � MVIw AIMrtSWYRHRkR� IWI xMI (➢61P)ISblOw.ISMI[�'FY. E 9PiMMI 16i VIBL 5S5.9WLw4bEMYC PNMBm YSY M1iM9Y5 MRR14 NRY wX 11F HWI SaRwM6 MSIPN BIMOw4Rm 6tHW5r/WIEOM:AL d.:MINVWA YAI'MLT 9LN SIFSYCM PMNEIFAS AW apfgYgN^HHYW12 R R-YNH Rll59Wl SLQPF1m Iw NtI1HM: A'N IR1'ARIgUMYYAVHVRISN WYRYM WYY PANIPNI SIMJfIwIE SCIW 9PNSM6Iw M 91F 4"65 RR41w: MT � BY MWI ]I. IMVWm19LVL HY4O (QNl OT'fWR WN RW) N t9RACr SX M WONA W@ ORAFwF SECTION 1-1 RR -RV N016 I) eoxs RP+® Ia mw xPlm OSnY ®wIw NOM E) RR Am®eu6 L) m woe HwcPwwm Nol lhmN GROUTED RIP -RAP DETAILS —.=F,. CONS)RUGIIa' NOTES - Eq TNM CONCEPTUAL GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN p owwc sneimM m H wmBv. O RIY BL[R4YMIIRf Il44AIKK4.V9 (H61RW SCLAE : I"=20'-0" © mH m H rmloxA 4xB PR H WPw YR Xxa2-a m HrmrArm p R«BIRH„rlr mal S.YE OILN IN wHFARXdIIW H61AmYAL NN EawSSM� Inca nEscNlvnoNEARTHWORK tOT 2) M 1RACT HO. MLBB. w T1E L11Y CF MAMIXA B.1N. CWNIY Q [QISIW.Cr1' PtC 4% b [xW R£ CF IAS A4 !F LAWCANH.AS PFA MAP )ILEO W 6IXW )4j M � w� ® IXNWdCI l' 1KK OYX#lE mKMY. . IIII Pa GES 41 10 50 M� WPS ® OM'MWT 4 )M. WXOER KVM'AY. Wa wm Q meWUW Hw NNRwM Mwam NR MAR Paver. BENCHMARK: MwmWswWl K�xrmrw ® mnmmx:r Wivaw will Pw 9➢MArz Paver. $OLOBB vedr Nn Bvow NVlSs air. azwAVMo Al MlmstxnG Bxu clvLrav m e ouuaro env eLw, g� miswiw Q RIRMer W BM No vrt-m wrAHN rcrus Iwa. )IIpCE HE1,v MPVG OIANIXID BaR IXro 31s w fi GLWC NOIG iss H anM"mw�- ® fgBM, ryl 51FY will qp 41ipAII RppA ELY Cf F R.O.flN. TAC NEAR NYY FNO Q CWSImC)5[fl HIW (W OfiM w%LN. ELEV Yu3R1 ® u,mE EY EaKIwrAArNww Pm �AXart wmr. ® KNSM,Cl21 YM IlH£ MD rYL MEY PFR .9]I.S RPiFf FELVIREA9AMH ® ICXID'4W1kCR[N aU1E AW 51WLG.P.]IFO tlAM PFAORM IIEf£(H WLlR4➢ABAIERIMi. amwt W"Y TMZ - HwN, `MM ¢mv N® uY[ 1 p4a�W PLLNW I 1 i sEcn RECRON -B _-T SECTION C -C IWC710NyR S3146'pp, P I VICINITY MAP I 'PI IP n'; 4 LEGEND I.�.=,I�mnx mune« �ImmP �4VVH PA�1 - .twwR [®slww a wa ®vee 0.`W W WE HNI ��wN V RIM WLN[ Wlmll CONSTRUCTION BID FEMS: CQVIFKfW =✓•'1 W0.2E ✓NrtEiY¢m 20 CPOTFW EYIi W � fIX1LVAryG. _EOfER5tt1T£EOGEC 04@FL1F_C6alEQ 084 CNl TO B'c G1mEC BY iiEPME¢N+M PC S9U7GR FDA B3p.V 0HR3 �[NNiTW 51W1aE.liiWR ,j LPVIRPLTGRSMALl51FA.Y GPSONCKN/EROXlvznn)TOTILS PPFASEE EtEVATYM'CTNWlG FOSWNTEOiASY" M47.MIERBY�E4IEGFCI �•/ WRERPW PNT0114R ClIWMFM T045F1EC1EC. CgJfAG C9Y WIYIWR95 pF 6EO GRl.GVRSf EDRG0.LSE1£CT?V Pi(ip)Bf035�. m9� OBElGM4C PAVER ORM pfN PA\tR59YLLy0E0Y H9G4¢p-IYU+.O@+SEy.0 ¢A VCR\M1115%�A.`90PoVCYvk b'%M'. CaLGRIgJIXLP G�exR � CPVIPCTPLSTN Vh00E¢6•EN^65JNGC OA•/yS fiFl90. 9+1586+3.'Y.YJ agKM.vs OFM FENCE PER ASSSG RE4PAd,'vV/.C�>pE�pKq..&V>�(aWy,�E0.�W/3%4FD4RgRICEWW"i AT H45E s..'wk Pam Kin, caw OO FVC BTp�SRT NTH WiR0.FngJ Cf 5tt9 TO�STPGl'®FGNE 5E LL4,TNYi 0.Ni FJtWMSW�. nimwvsme>rt of ssnicfp. OHGNHVAWL£aRfX1AV Lv£Wg1 VIT, 2RCK.M4_EE!£VAITJNIAPNMG.tt9lGI0PoLKIXJ:%4^ 35'IGHB CKRA.^.EA ATE4 awiu+u-uw wma OBRA FA'fC WhEWPT GIASIERCGCRhW,ENrtn GPiELINIRPLTCRFW 6PlE laMMi8Y3. .N%HECr ci fLR. �1M16ATCAnO RtA5lER4 ¢viEcwnWsrea asnaw IMT<H HRLKPV M110.5E SEEPPG4rtEC.5RM5GD¢vL.S\GR A^O WlE 0£VPTG1 - OSTAVE VEVICGKVAIHPGN@44W RYJN6.0 �STdKTIH+N.DGP.4FR5CELM.�iOR51YRin \VNLG Nacos Rcexutsts NNe �e �.wner FpRc«+wsm9s'a�WHrs.fc (NsrK.BGse.ai Oor RFGutw'rcwsl ORAGSIWWf SiG\GS SET IXi3rv4RfA¢94:£M1AVrA 8EM'FENSiQ•LS F.RRAY:NG OIS IKi1NLCOSCmENFEw. WRIRPy MCP V MTO tt9TPISN^I�PCTM4NG. WP115. OGNRYFGUMAb PFANIE 1Z aT»'VTH[£MERG SFJL GKF9 NTiN LF!PNlvEll< � -- QaeUsra�v-vv.s�E iD cwm. rwarrswu�nr»nPwudFmFi.ve. O'BNM£BE)(F3OE®GR9VROVC¢PLR FA9�W/3%4 WCMTCFLYnYi / '� OY •BM:BH ewc%Er,Rrw.ixsePr v/w.NamerzKcu. r-wTCH ersm prvHw� 1j660.061 /� / � / QPAVER siEmv�veu PuowaaElwHEN FxHEVRuwywaNs i 0 use+Evcmer�iEwmwra+EosEEs�.rs�w Awsv. �j�,�,y/8p� � / OGOFtIXATCM-SEE 9vAN ><0.iV /WCRIYMTYNftPN. -/'���� O2X4ENGRA9M£+HEWAB.19®'WF]"FJi£EWE. i OBGf.IWl: saa FEtigvmrvcPre Garv:Eoaxe �--� /_�F � % i/ ws®�ac s1rmEFecevs�e ww.�ae Nrr,. _ -_ ../ / i QsFr. NpNsixzoweu rwTU HvusE snx<u. '__� ���j// OSiPT1ElaNYSL ON..£RR TU9FRY _- � / WOIKT Xbp�/¢{fM1H4^ 5 C9VFFAIL ttLSfGNE 51NLL BESJW.iEi Hv lar STq•E M�5lCMIE-CFLI£NNE. STIP®SICTE-fiSO.A I>�E ••'ttv'4ro/cHa:rWwwESmow� PLLGRAI. r�G. NIEONI'�9TC ME axBar.WswNrS uaExon®vff a'ncvra+s.¢ �SSWYIaE SfpKS fAtR TCS .u..pscs o.VtvµmVJme¢z/Evwvs wgyzyuu n�P. wP�ues [R sss B�FLLETW SW.LBE�TD YNTG YJIGEN. m¢@¢si45w:� ��Wmcw w.masv6.0 atdfa..sj•amy¢am�aa�i C�CCIXJ�F_SH4l BE BT OAY6 UlAt (Sabi) T��ymCB�g�m= �@ro'w�r,.en ••wapry ewapnnsTn,e Gzim.Toxrcry rCsr gvq�FeBn q.g.Va•<.ro F*y= a aW Fnaaxi &fiF- WNR.+CFGFSWY. SL9rtU CJEIE CAGR _ SaWEFWA4 VAL �uwmmonm_c �rt�cYAtw.vm wwea snA¢9re EO RCYxNn�ss�t•rENx�i cP�sw¢g�Cv'v S4 BISST�1. sB E' ieewieaaw ♦411Y41EW4511N1�itl.P'0.9T FNfiH PS5i2RR0 mamx.-2Asf•uvam/c[oms+saxT wmuuv ttaau LLvzaaxea Vu+iL-®sntiry v/ic9 wVvrvce�xwwewmc-�s ua=. BY riCtiERJ 01•B A+, ai•rt�asxrm•xnw'ms•seiashw�ia¢.zwa. H9veP�e•w¢a rns esv�.aaxsx'v:no w�5v[£agn CBLVEGAYCR�slW1BEBYBF3fiNA- Pu pxavas:szwice mNrs,®mrts:mm+w aes•'mv �w.w[.T Y.w PAV[R. N+M]54 tIX'EOA+®Efr Y'%b'. p[E6e T11fl.AN AS NSRFD BY VOLEYBIA➢AGIMIFid^lS wumrowrxiYNwme¢wawmC Nrxs[x�o. CK/APlNElO£INDCE¢NKPRlMEET� 9W1 BE Asi55aPs ww.��.wiv cwcv.rcnmHH SNCW.�Yart �cnwre �ws con mAr�. SF'.\-EDBYQA•fJC1lEN•DIW 4G. .EM4'Elt evi:e nmrmaau•++•R ccwcc wnncxr w:tnzvc Ba -mi GIWYNJEV AT(9J9)fvi3-0ST. amJKwt[NramrtssimsMEmvwaaa - rucorimcwzwu. iOmnroaY�i�a-rursA•oawwsss r,........©.. , ems. •,..%s �'r'3EEEeEEeee:: e„ :;;;;;;e••aeaieeiieee� Ee 9:; == •Re � I ........el:iFiiiiii:iiaii::..: � ::::::::aid:iii �aiiiii22E'e•.i.� ,_ ,. � WINDI''�ILL D wamrmixc um Bparure 3EAINS PPEPPPEn aY: g�alEs.mc :FNa MM.aX1.R MGp�1.G 9100E 1 3633560) O 10 sRnr�pHcr,�e l i l i l I S I I I Z Q J U- U- 0- z az �zu? pm ty.H� uuTa3A Q�z 3 D °6 m r z NO Z� 3 \1' onnwnm yr SHEETI NORTH �,V-1Op L-2 40 61 OF. 7 INS, 1. STONE PA -110 2. STAOX-0 STONFSTEP 3 E>PANSONJOINT R -S25 (D NOM SEE U& TNG PLAN FOR LIGHTS IN STEPS SAY 1. COVLRET-PPD W/STONES ON TOP IIJI IIII IIII 4. FEBAR�CON5TRIA.T'CY.N R.AN D. FWISHGWDE 11-11M �IIIANI WALL CAP OVERHANG 11 TYPICAL. HARD5CAPE STONE STEPPING PADS STONE STEPS THICKENED EDGE EXPANSION JOINT AT HOUSE LMTV H 0, I EEI FOUNTAN PLAN gj jo'k 771v m I -N., H CI) 2�HSQUA�XTI�TUBULAR T5A�T�A�5O�OM(jll F FOr N,AN FLEVC70N A11-2 "_�i RALS. POSTSSMAU_FE ETRATEINTO F00T916 10IMCMfEMIN_ FOSTSSMALL LALPIL TO FRAMERMIL5TOPAND SOTTOMAT4-ONICENTE1 4081.NTALPICKET I BE 24. pErr By 1 Y DIAMETERCONCKETEFOOVN. ALL FENCE AND &ATE METAL SMALL SE METAILIZeD AND FOnPIER COATED AFTER FABRUCATIOML CCI_CR TO BE SELECTED, TUBULAR STEEL FENCE DETAIL GI,NI� ALB FOUNTAN SECTION srxevt=so ENTRY WALK S�A T INS, ap TYPICAL DIRECTIONAL SPOT LIGHT :1iWl6 R/VYI�PPFJ9 TYPICAL FLOOD LIGHT , �o ar TYPICAL WELL LIGHT, c �� LAWN AREA wua u0n p ry m�oNNunnlxc GruaxnxG TYPICAL LANDSCAPE AREA U(5HT ,. LIGHTING LEGEND 5YMBOL EXHIBIT `F° UC4MNG FDCTl IN RELATION TO WATER ® Iryr OUNIM e, rsae's vpYY Niimwo0xe ELEMENTS na 9G Oo c •,... Mwdnllnr ENMON G'LG Y'1o5 1� Imf- �.�wrs w�c sT.re,ea.mww +,sn.w.wirwms uss�ncrn�snsw�en�mcmauavranmwwn2c IrcNIM1.EG APPROVED LIGHTING - "'•._•,�'v�'� _ IwrtwN �r FNONrY�NG aEra�cNl � �..kr �,r..,��,a 5"•�•�`�""'E�� NOTE: WTIIxEIXCFPII'.INOFPEGESIPNN �� +o asera>ev��arm�vv.wrw-,c-.enc-_=._"_- .are rG..s�.crz 6WIOBlINYPOIHTSMTHEPROPERIY. rw ror,ro¢mwra arm mEwrewnuw-,Er..vl ma" .. .- NLQi9110fl INiMBLUChTFD'MIxIN TXE93FT. FflONi YM09E1&4:NMFA slu'iaewwnEcrvENExxlartr. r�asw wnusrFn �'^-a'V+-e'�a��rmernmgxoraa.r amrtaV:smries _ EL-INE a. TOTAL WATIPGEOFkUN DTII llONf _ ap TYPICAL DIRECTIONAL SPOT LIGHT :1iWl6 R/VYI�PPFJ9 TYPICAL FLOOD LIGHT , �o ar TYPICAL WELL LIGHT, c �� LAWN AREA wua u0n p ry m�oNNunnlxc GruaxnxG TYPICAL LANDSCAPE AREA U(5HT ,. LIGHTING LEGEND 5YMBOL DE56RPIION/COLOR MILD, MODEL NO L4MF VOLTP E NO ® POIIMMN LNiHNN6 rV na 9G Oo OF- 7 �.�wrs w�c sT.re,ea.mww �� -� n�v . j � �I INGRiEGT LIGHT .n ap TYPICAL DIRECTIONAL SPOT LIGHT :1iWl6 R/VYI�PPFJ9 TYPICAL FLOOD LIGHT , �o ar TYPICAL WELL LIGHT, c �� LAWN AREA wua u0n p ry m�oNNunnlxc GruaxnxG TYPICAL LANDSCAPE AREA U(5HT I ALL LIGHT FIXTURES WRHIN h E 32 FT. FRONTYARD5ETq <5HA1 OO IRY WITH THE A5SOGA IONS SCREENING GUIDELINES. SEE GUT SHEETAEOVE. 01 WINDI''IILL Dig. .. _. e,NnvMesawL 1 � IZI 'UmUm 50 IL0R m Y m Z 1 z¢ � 3 1 0 i ,1 ,. LIGHTING LEGEND 5YMBOL DE56RPIION/COLOR MILD, MODEL NO L4MF VOLTP E NO ® vrr+Js wi ern ar rova� na 9G Oo OF- 7 �.�wrs w�c sT.re,ea.mww a. I ALL LIGHT FIXTURES WRHIN h E 32 FT. FRONTYARD5ETq <5HA1 OO IRY WITH THE A5SOGA IONS SCREENING GUIDELINES. SEE GUT SHEETAEOVE. 01 WINDI''IILL Dig. .. _. e,NnvMesawL 1 � IZI 'UmUm 50 IL0R m Y m Z 1 z¢ � 3 1 0 i ,1 onnwx or: ov. NORTH SHEET NO scnLe, V-Ia-a GENERP,L LIGHTNG na 9G Oo OF- 7 �.�wrs w�c sT.re,ea.mww I ALL LIGHT FIXTURES WRHIN h E 32 FT. FRONTYARD5ETq <5HA1 OO IRY WITH THE A5SOGA IONS SCREENING GUIDELINES. SEE GUT SHEETAEOVE. 01 WINDI''IILL Dig. .. _. e,NnvMesawL 1 � IZI 'UmUm 50 IL0R m Y m Z 1 z¢ � 3 1 0 i ,1 onnwx or: ov. NORTH SHEET NO scnLe, V-Ia-a L-4. na 9G Oo OF- 7 1 �.d�vu2vtmum covv,...m>„svanaa mm'.Ic�valA'M.f 3 AYYI6PA'E _ . ::£. OEVAlIl1.V ANAIGN WALL MOUNTED IRRIGATION CONTROLLER � 9 I ©-- IIII=111=1�I� 1111=1TII4�II= Q ;1111 K_ pY8 —111=111= 11u-1�u=�1�1` Illi=11114111 IIII411L==1116 pulllM - 9E $ � —Q 111-.1111-1111= °RAxmA��� o v III =1111 IIII. .�n,x,s Ea-Asm,om�,n.l.wmow, s.rru sacsolm�..vas-G,.z�.l� -1111 1111— I— a s"o..�o��rvaai"un� ��aOVV x a 3. =I1 -II _II' a wwswoa¢-.,wam�^cNw,e I Wur1FnC11NFR 1231¢ RCnll['WSGi MJJW �B2WiNRtE-t8Y'M KVE67`[XnxCW[z ti ~wwd'f�IVmI £PtMY.>ff Refil i1L 'j � - ,A •IAA A o]G Imrelwrx.s.e�wawc�v+ruw _ m� w� $.ns. BACKFLOW PREVENTER REMOTE CONTROL VALVE P..-mnp G SIXA nG.�-wa. p K A.-------A-A ff55 y2 y y �I ISI$ A I a xyyyy r�s i�R$I ve�g�Ru$ 8 Spy3 55 a _�i€. 6 8�ac ��€ ® R 166g1 g S $ E a S> !„it 11 � 9 I ©-- IIII=111=1�I� 1111=1TII4�II= Q ;1111 K_ pY8 —111=111= 11u-1�u=�1�1` Illi=11114111 IIII411L==1116 pulllM - 9E $ � —Q 111-.1111-1111= °RAxmA��� o v III =1111 IIII. .�n,x,s Ea-Asm,om�,n.l.wmow, s.rru sacsolm�..vas-G,.z�.l� -1111 1111— I— a s"o..�o��rvaai"un� ��aOVV x a `wr-»aw"--rvowe -�,o peac�>�lrr,>trao raA..�$..nsRe. =I1 -II _II' a wwswoa¢-.,wam�^cNw,e iWFM5FAi 64a.VXVE TM�u�n Wur1FnC11NFR 1231¢ RCnll['WSGi MJJW �B2WiNRtE-t8Y'M KVE67`[XnxCW[z ti ~wwd'f�IVmI £PtMY.>ff Refil /��// - 6 ll HOSE BIB INSTALLATION DETAIL o]G Imrelwrx.s.e�wawc�v+ruw _ m� w� $.ns. BACKFLOW PREVENTER REMOTE CONTROL VALVE � 9 I Q -E¢e'e-rFRrvomE K_ pY8 � pulllM - 9E i e.F iE m x a 2a �' - nWems x.A o]G W O��X�$onen P..-mnp �i�s'41np^m nG.�-wa. p K ff55 y2 y y �I ISI$ A I a 8 IN > asuswnv�.o pre�rervrnmrnww nPOP - UP SPRAY HEAD SPRAY HEAD ✓£ OR BUBBLER ON RISER s urfxl. Weaars. ae wvmv¢u raalcv.au...um�ncrm e. �W�PAv�i w..r`�nanvm.wfs x+armtaE. . R/slkwpID$^LV'L. YA�R6W rmaroasinuma czcmrcavnrummw®awes ancm rc...c fiT R E N G N G oV�/INDI`'IILL DR. wWat CONSE¢VATON RE(NIrzEnE' T drR LROWhNLE NO ox Sn wkvlalkn¢ pnpaNJ py Nd dN/Aol Nbtih Im8a4on LompanY lac orw: esi u+now LeA: 95t.312M¢8 }�dflv IwilwnwLlmo�1 1 mm L a WWz �z WW O F Y a WA�' = Z a3 IBt oc tiETER w z ,0 Q -E¢e'e-rFRrvomE � 9 pY8 � pulllM MTCI N�YJ wuwx ew. yr IORTN SHEETI o w so OF - 7 -E¢e'e-rFRrvomE � 9 � K K Ok MTCI N�YJ wuwx ew. yr IORTN SHEETI o w so OF - 7 GENERAL NOTES AND SPECIFICATION5 t GQ£.aN. NTI..E TO CONIRA'-TOt. �i �xerrnTrzv-i�rprcros.�¢x�5raxsddxaArmmn�cRw-szw�mioJSTn�csxrwmr.�ymsT.�u. r®mmdxlwr..�dTrc�w.iwxN T.sx�.cFrw`� amx�rsw.s.�..rg xwa.can w.pwx d..srxw,rff r.•r IRRIGATION SPECIFICATIONS A GENERsNL saes..:rmrwaanumm�e�+amxwar°�iuk `�'sAw��'e a��wasoviacs®A�"'ro.Lvnoiwu.um�re w.worm+r.ry r+ala®xT1�s �.-wmss,.0 Twa na�xnAswrw.ca+sry aeanserc. mlewe�`xzxe6 � �sa'a`Pi3m•�^� �Tmx`xwea.c�°'6eovwcwr"isa�wroNw.�wm, s.:a^w'�mresm �ir�n®��A;�•�••�neraa�ex�vrrr�x.rosrw.��-TF.o. r.d�cw�A.d.onE re�fni®driW UA�..v�. 1C6rP.ciuYa�Nz¢w5u¢uw.'�uT�� m'eY�L�ays-,Tmireanxn W.v[m� A4TIa„� x,r��r,�Rnraaldbrm,�«„m�.;�dm �x.��•..". �".� T.IrsTrE� ��m� mrxarl�we>ET.wm1 vrnwL.w.r.alm....xw.r,.e.� tNsamrrwruswsawvnT�,.wns.vwy.G.smcarc Nnonaes�+x �roe'F wonENsnxwm+drsSxsrrs 9 ngTEw.Ls q ILLTcxnwxWasNwa¢aGamaTnAW�tat Vxwrwu'N:T/BBIa'n'o-eOmv9a'aasst\Ns^m 4 TY+TPllAR^N wx�l �uT®.X �rarysmaEAtea+nlu¢,xwacve'remesrrerwwrreaa�.rrnxsre za.�uiwu+c'rvr¢Awv uE ryWt �me¢crCWmoencTos9wLsaucrrc%Tsxwexvm.r..Ew.vma,ersRi:or�sevEw�oarvnaecerwawdlsw nsuenrorgrws,rwaai+rrRsay uwsrve.waLxnsATarcN.sday.�¢.as.u.mnas'®NxTemxas�LN wYAusew� swwsvms'.Tn Trero waswgo �'�T�ecwmisSxTreA•gw Aax.ev.N �nartrolXw2 emuCutaewexTlEbCeeasn•'Mg{x"V'TeTv � SWmmcTat�..iWu.A�rewLL,tt� KV9-rtsI¢c.6KT.w,xe NneEV&lnawartYwmwls WtlSSrn'm.Rs sNv.V�vl'u5-�isfN as`¢aN6HI®ux ®GLTdLa'�v yaim V..wrts.Rcws TO Ncwlm o`uggMv. o.NlFcitlr iaNnva NatE�s�wiq�.y "�v�il'�iET,�amwnrewo,� pa>:TO T,e�4amiewrxdNp'arrtsuKBa.ce r�� ��a„a,�„Ip.GTaLN•a,.�R.a.sT„x�Nra��,.o.x..l..�.waw«,�a.la�N®eaa NTIE EYB.TT101E6 iF1D1'bpp-ATLMI CGMW4TLR 9441115E TFE wuaww:clvrRts eQt EJLJf pAeFTGN Fmpneac l@ALGV4i� S06G QMRF Purwwrvxw GUDB roaSele PLANTING SPEGIPCATIONS SCOPE OF WORK OPLL L^6iP EW&T'@AI. FWTRYl ANO SFRJiGEa MELE55NLY rO G'J4�ETEllE FlN6H GPFGNr.� .q�PRA'HIXJ. ws+IvuG..a-®.nmrtENaze As saF�o. A GENERAL WORK PROCEDURES wca:r¢-s svAaLn Ve;r eJSTa-,aerrseac.� Nl MarG13455YALL 6EBE5rAVTV.P3tE. �nqT BEO%N S^iX. WECAigKN AN] FJYt11NG1AVlL WRIGATON WOiK AXA.WO a aamY; russ.s coNwErea�lvres� z Rr�-oLsmv-s�c�sHaieE raFJv ro pr�r-aslErvrHEslscEeoEsu R1. �mmr�A �.wDrvwRE rewr RA4P'ARE GRews4rmwo4 DRrNGaxaNG wwn Gcpeegml_ 3. wEEaVG. �A\O a.WNG GR+tAVGgm F�WSN GRPTMG. Plly,F£♦DSAVOsrm7WmaJS GaAs5E5. NyT GRASZ NiJJ61k'�i7N GRAf 94LLL�GHG'Y MY FRHMf TEO IXL qX pRBYT1E RCpI'S q4p O�,M£p CF OFpylp. <Gi9'fGES E,NLL�KEFTOFNYAVD MWMPPkU FTfEE6 UXJ5TgJLGq ynER pLL En VlYCL1Y(N�i,E"LT'�Yy'AW OE90E SFW_BEIC-+1OVEDFRy1RESTE r1GIXJ CQ'"RE!bNOF£KHEWYS WRN Al AOR A�F'RIYrS SENLL�^ `.MFAF02 WA,HEO MIpNLY B. I-ATERIALS scmreRQx Fmrx.I>ae-a a so�suLan_sQE suJue s. P0.YHHt _ RasnEre srt4L s ra�rel-rw�cx sH.0 pF. . ws: L ECiCb GR 2gMVDATMl NiE SNLL2E RE70JED FTG^ -'ITIS SrtE P'd-.E.AATELY�SPEQAL G^RESHA' L2ETiCENTOINSYc iH1TRh TS iN GJNIPo'ECa PR'c MFGLLgTp.Y WATQtED. 9. RP)RMG M -P11 E(%L 9KKF61PFJT5 FQt TREE . SrWllBS.NgcT LNLESa OI'.ffTNASE NOIEO. SWYL BE rAF A�EO S'.TL CQ4JSlIHG OF nOX N'IRRffD ORCgMG AnENIXB TS PND 6D6 SrNA&£ EXSTWG SOL q.11s GQ_Y,�ERS F£R T iE Fd.ILM1NG A^YyJNTS P1YGTCLVAESiC6l�>TILN'i. uNIFNLTOR3Nu. /Y-GlYIRYG f38 -V LJ A®IF.!,1nMYlY!/J�•Try,wOJAyH AT T1E fQygNNG RAF_5 AWAY ATI V]rHS. GER I.GINJ �AFr.F�ALLLMIPS NFAE TLLNFO bL W/A^'FNIX-EryrS (gE G5)•U-(gL�XfgyF,y B?OS XA.Y ATS LBS G£R W91C YnFD OFrS,L 2T'R+cttn Y(KLP �Q.KTLV Tm-c I-IlGp vpcs 0..m WONO.YLGACZETSPOI^LIM TO PL. tel' •01B ROJrF1415 ATAE F(hiPVAK' RATE+ Gc+L=3vgck< LS AAL.a RPLCS fo4fscTTrtictA�sSl-33n w¢ SIHA!Ees. ' G INSTALLATION. t =oL✓.NxnawING 6.pN SLLLE ALFAS) TIE FQ16MxuGPmLCAT1w sH�LLeEw4:E. _.. L4'O �wR<FFST OF A�A.wD slwi EIE n cour»cY asrvATED rvra TE0� YbSW b GO,eVJf FIERGInL I£RRJI$[ 1COIb5l2L HLTWTE 0.L5 GR MILVES�Jd. COMJRgN- W.1H 5t6.+E5 GRFAIERTMgNA31 RAM AGEpS-pf 21REEM'DMTsERMIIK o)IXC VATSMPTS WrtH VFRIKAL Sn£+FG4Pol RNJ!$yifVBS A^�'IRES Ri54KLL�1-V)Tlf'IEShE Of➢IH OF BPoLS M®TW2'E RgA U4DM OITER :gB/�fO�IT?RSH-41BE tt-VEO TO WWf6Yl'F1LL F1aT THE FQLWM'[i. 3 TA91 �SRXN 5 GN!A\' R.wr R TPBLc SK.V' N 15 G/WSFI 0.NJT ]TA'Y.E'cNJNt2 G4'rTCR!FTRK TRLNK FOR Sf£OI'EN vW.RS LAaGERTH-N LS GN1pV51MJs-}Jp lss.SQL ShN1 B'c OSGOSID Q=6FTHE TIE 9TE. S2E6CgJ}NNFJL halryg,=R LS TAB T5 WEGHTGyryS ai lAN i S GALLON � 1. SGALLGN ,o BOXID CGVFANER �p W RA4lINGHEGHr GF SN�l9SAW 16 GR[TMSTO eE1 WL11 PBNc flNS4�UNLLY N'JIEOOIIYSMISELN IiPN. e)CL}®AR SPLAT kXIITCM1 OFRTAYOTWY®R@4V. PoI.SQLAi2NO 94LOF PA'vTxSK aK.I(gLLA55pEgn®AyD WATE¢T%Mp,IGryLY (1 Y3nrRgTELY PFTERR% NY. STA�[EALLTFEES TO HgYW(DgryKEFFC(}WNpgS� LID. GRN£ArcvgSARgrypgANrS TOfiNS4 GRIv'gA'A dSRY.aELF ENCEF � WATER-SYEryATAYMER0.pVIING. WAI ER SH/1L�ARiAEOTO EKIIT(EEA� SHL1LL, N ��I-1Q1A iNWKE¢AE T095PJGB BK15ELGK MJLG.AN'J TO LE �'rENTTHAi sLL NAlE0k5 W Tl1E RMTNG VpLEA�TKWpJG,sLY SAIURAT©ia(SE-RANrhYa Oc. Y1.5 FOt VAQw'1QM52Y.A2FTEi _AVTIMS%TSi�CFOJND fFJVER3 E✓HI.2E4 XC,�p�q/gTTO PCL ATQGY WO.Y qA"-�Vl.1HOUTCpiSiNGSc OFI9pl"NGTHERCVTfi^LLRPNTAT SPPONG pf,Y)QI.p1EAS yyIXGgl6 GN TIEG4AUliNGS. S}L SY'..�Rc ry,.gvmcum FOR SUPPLYING ALL PLANT MATERIAL CONTACT: FABIAN MONI OF findMoni AT Tel: (949) 903-1469 Fax: (949) 854-4641 Fabian@andmoni.00m HYDROSEED SEED SELECTION The Wkimrlp sM sxdi te.wppiretl MJ S&Szi Pk 605504-0436 Camx[ Jo* Millu 9jodymia"si-dsmm Arta wa oliwdt 0.2 C F. SgKONSH AMply knbkrtn6lentirw 4.0 &ALT OWFSH E.'skid ,Ni 1.0 WisST WNROWFA Eriogonump ssiism 1.0 QIFF HUMWHGT Lowssttgariva 4,0 TxMWEED Iupmus blwlor 2,0 ANNUAL WPINE Afimulus aurantiaars lory(bru� 0.1 MONKEYFMWER mw. -e rrm-'irma LO ANNUAL MUHLY GMSS Ma.a. pukh. 6.0 pHPPLE&TssA &iNum f- 2.0 BIALK&AGE w4sk, m'rmatMJrya 0.0 S FE&NE FIBERMULCH SPECIFICATION hntrtlwNYamfbbraNRFGMt1aMe N(IW IM. phew. GN 4Nm49PAeaMFl,lalepa3xl poywp 4fi5Newan XP FGI �Wfl9gy MMd�NINI H/L�rwLMc HYDROSEEDING AMENDMENT, SOIL CONDITIONING AND FERTILIZER RECOMMENDATIONS �.wnNG.� sAF-rER ca,r4�ncN �.v.L anNr a.LsrAL.A,mN (cwEcz�'c.-AQocG�E¢,Gz EQ. a AT,wo INu or�.I AeFia LEss TwN avEwwrsEGAnERsmLErI9.�T �._._ _ .sn4ieE r+<nuLQeo TO Ac-IEr1HE z-Q4RmroEGFH s nANrBu.Nce.4w-(oGTuux-Eola4YS AssEGPRATEenr� PLL RNPPG sst44J_EE n4vr4NED (e o.nm�ATxlG. eaQa4lm. wE=_D. wATERNG.aEmNG. seza:NG waNw FQREQ T� wvs.wTez camLFnQN P.4onccEvv4ucE OFPLLFUNnr4G. ALL9IRJB�PNDTR2T+NOl LrNwA <R eo my `�s H?5YEN4JLE S44LBE REGV<Ep. AFNN_MSGELlYAV 51W10E n4£FNTFEOWN�GR M50RIER R®RE56\'IATNE TO e ��`�`�an �•Ri"_..%, Vc-PJc FYTIE FLL.OJFNG. HFPLMY GEST W£E RIWr MIEIDM_x VJYA£ WEED F -0£E GAIAO C?v£¢NFA+. STAGNfi OFTREES. I�t�maaapmnrepuwalMpgsl.wpuwmxnn we,.nt uweewam. uuxm Ire .wcwr �we�mwwaeawwwrprelmomnvm mnMw.n:s,wr�emnem. rewbx¢�b m6ilus+Tav+se'�w✓�umwmvneu aw�raewrvm'� .n •Pw�+wml.�l.aw ru.exuvar ;u rx,m..iamnnl m.c-rcau Im..nnmalrw.wma I,s me a -m xwR��alre�w,a.�aNn.m� w w. Nwm.wwwmelwaowe r�.�,n...�„,..,w.m...wlre...��1.��:,•wx... �ti Z'rwaare. f- U gyg9R 24g j SHEET NO L- 7 OF- 7 a z IK M i ROOF PLAN I� UL O O � P X E am ENEVELOPE AT FACE OF ; ' E < O BUILDING, NOT CENTER OF ROOF -------------- ------ -- - F _- —-""- ® z c _______� m m n z 0 ____________----__—.__ n --------------------------------- ________________________________ b_ --------------- C 2 FF 1066 _______________ 1060 ___ __PL _____ R1060 ----------------- I H _ 10_5_5u - -__ 1ST FLOOR I _ _____ _ __1050________ " _______________________________ 1050 b - _ _ _ EXIST GRADE Iff _ ____________ _______- ------------ iNDi FINISH GRADE 1045 __________1045 ___ 1045 _ ________________ 1040 - — 1040 a ________________ _ _______ ______ TW104 __________ 1035 BW 1037 CONC BALUSTERS ON RET. WALL ---------------------------------1035 ________ ________________{*-GRADE-- _ I _ -1030 --------------- ___ ____________________________ ___________________ ______________ 0 10 010 __________ ___________-_-_. _ __________________BW 1024 05 n n m U Q 0 z 0 0 a Q Q Y ¢ W LLQ O W 0 I < v W a F p . = Z m � W ¢ o J � N LEFT ELEVATION, NORTH SIDE SCA 1/4[NR-1R-0N �. 8 VACANT SITE RHU REPLACEMENT I TREE 3:1 RAnO ' FOR BLACK W LNUT �m INDIAN CREEK ROAD PAVING AREA 1767 SOF TOTAL FRONT YARD PRE 3D X 158= 4740 SO COVERAGE OF PAVING 37 60% OK PLN MIA EXISTING RESIDENCE PRELIMINARY PLANT LEGEND CONCEPTUAL I lAG KEY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE REMARKS WA- TREES lAC WAL Lo estro to indica Juglanx COIRornieo Crape MyrOe Slack Walnut 24; box z4 BDX 24 box I PW RMI RHU PIM Rhus larcea WASHINGTONIA palmate African Sumac Mexloan fan palm SHRUBS I SRO 0O BRO Bougcinillleo 'Rasanka' Rasenka Bougainvillea 5 gal 1 GPM Gardenia josminoides 'Myatoy' Mystery Gardenia 5 gal GAV n GAV Wrdanlo psminoldea 'VelaIH VetcM1R Gardenia 5 gal A�s�'� MG 1.A UG a Dwarf al gal Ngndni dompestiee^'Harbour =m Dwarf Heaawanly Bamboo 1 OSM s Sweet ahc ot 1 PHRO PR PM1earl. ros mend Pigmy Dale Petra155 gal multi jy PON Q ^ pOH POdcarpue honked Long Leaf Yellow —wood W gal PR 0 PIT Pittesporum tobira Meek Orange 5 gal O TIB Tbrvll ouchins uleano Process Flower 5 gal TIB SMAIL SHRUBS mixed colors AW AGP Agaponc ofrkanue 'Peter Pan' Dwarf Uy of [M1e file 1 gal HEIR HEM i Hemerocdliz hybrids Daftly 1 DDI _ Marathon m egad 0 o.c. pio^t O — GROUNDCOVER V Plant O 6' e.e. = — LAWN Pelargonium pellatum Tall Fescue spD. Ivy Geranium d Data AM — Myopomm 'PadOw.m' -,.P.-no 1 gal 10 F TOC VINES FDR RETAINING WALLS _ JASMIMUM MULTIFORUM STAR JASMINE 5 gal PAVING AREA 1767 SOF TOTAL FRONT YARD PRE 3D X 158= 4740 SO COVERAGE OF PAVING 37 60% OK PLN MIA EXISTING RESIDENCE un N s P P °D U g OU QD J x LL 91) W �� W U3 f1 O M O to cry ® m � z p O a H r. to [L Urn In N U O Q O m N � Z Z O 0 Q s LS APN 87713 036 018 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALE 1 INCH = 10 FT un N s P P °D U g OU QD J x LL 91) W �� W U3 f1 O M O to cry ® m � z p O a H r. to [L Urn In N U O Q O m N � Z Z O 0 Q s LS VACANT SITE RHU PAVING AREA 1767 50 TOTAL FRONT YARD ARE 30 X 156= 4740 E F COVERAGE OF PAVING 37 GSOR OK INDIAN CREEK ROAD PLM OSM EXISTING RESIDENCE APN 87713 036 018 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALE 1 INCH = 10 FT rn cs Cc IN M to ra G RL P N U [T M 2f P QED _J X LU LU U-1.. ((-�r� L17 LLJ� ILD O Lo LLln ® m Co z p P O Q, ILO ca a� U rn Mi N U O ¢ O m N O Z Z � O oa s 7-i LS PRELIMINARY PLANT LEGEND I y LAG MM 1\ TY KEY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME AI£ REMARKS WAL LAG La es[roemia Intllca WAL Rh..nI Colifwnica RHU RM1us IGTON Cnpe MyNe Black WSum African Sumac 2♦♦' box 24' BOX 24' Cox REPLACEMENT TREE 3:1 RATIO N �. PIM WASHINGTONIq Robusta M RHU Mexkan ran palm �y FOR BLACK WALNUT P sHRufis 70 % owO GAl Y _BRO Baugaindllea 'Rosenka' 1 O GAM GOMmio j.—inoidea'MNtery' Roaenka 8ougaim0a. Mystery Gardenia 5 gel 5 gel Gardenia 5 W GAV F 5� CAV Gardenia joaminoides v tetir YY Velchii gal UG CF' UG OgusWm pponlcum'Texamm NAH Nondmo domeshca Harbour Owarf Texas Prixxl Dwarf Heavenly Bamboa 5 gel 1 gal NMOSM��{ --OSM Ohoenik s kagrobelmil a Sweet Date _ 5 gal j PHR Phoenk r0ebelmg Pigmy Date Polm 15 gal multi 1 PHR POH Q .--- POH Podocarpue M1enkaM long Leaf Yellow—woad 15 gal PIT Q PIT PlttasPorum tobiro Mock Orange 5 qol TIB Tbou hmo urvtleano Princess Flower 5 gal M8O SMALL SHRUBS AGP mixed calors l ACP Agapanthue africanus 'Peter Pen' Dwarf Uly of the Nile 1 g01 HEIA HEM HemerGcallI, hybrids Dayny 1 qac - Marathon I or equal a. ppllonk O 12'c. R GtOUNDCOVER o. ant O e'c - ' —LAWN — Pelargonium peltatum Toll Fescue app, i y Geranium tl Bots Myapomm'Pomficam' Myoperum 1 gal 1D F TOC VINES FOR RETAINING WALLS JASMIMUM MULTIFORUM STAR JASMINE 5 gal PAVING AREA 1767 50 TOTAL FRONT YARD ARE 30 X 156= 4740 E F COVERAGE OF PAVING 37 GSOR OK INDIAN CREEK ROAD PLM OSM EXISTING RESIDENCE APN 87713 036 018 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALE 1 INCH = 10 FT rn cs Cc IN M to ra G RL P N U [T M 2f P QED _J X LU LU U-1.. ((-�r� L17 LLJ� ILD O Lo LLln ® m Co z p P O Q, ILO ca a� U rn Mi N U O ¢ O m N O Z Z � O oa s 7-i LS ------------- _________•_______ ___ w_______ _Imi _______ ____ _Ipfi- • _•f6i a _f05i i i OSi _N i a - n 1 - o FLOOR R lass 1 _ _ _ _____________ ___________ ___ _Vb1 lu FLOOR IT 1055 FF 1056 ___ J65i------------___ V O' _________ _�Ofi ________ __________Wi ________________ _________________ ________________________—Iltli _____________________________________________ __-N'i_ __________________t¢6 _______________________________________________Imi_________________________+o>i SECTION A SCALE 1/8=1Fr EXISTING "R NEW FlNL MADE LEcwD --------- rnsnrvG GRADE NEW FH GRADE ®1 Lc EL P a P X ftD � I F S rl ® n ® ) z Qj oam P J a ~ z O < K 4 U << W -2 U) < a F c w < DO w 6 lWp 055----------10115------ 052-------- 10110------ 055_--------1055------ iW 103 u-3 -----10x0------ 7 1= 4 FT 10.45_-------- 1045--_ -- M 1042-------- 1040--- 2:1 ass TW 1033 — —1im�1I BW- 1fl27— -- — H=6 FT111�11= IIII 4 toxo - I-11=111�IIlr 1- 1025 SECTION E SCALE 1/4 INCH= 1 FT - 0 IN BW 103 1045 H=4FT 1040 — 1035 027 1030 BH FT - 1025 — — ' -------------------- ----------------- - _______,mZ___—___ __. --------- ------- i' ----ems ,_ I 1213 �e LI_______ _ __ __I_.�a� SLI -III I� 1 LII -I II II�II111 II Ilblll�l II III ,� -- - --------------- ----- —------------- — ..,R � k _ -- —I — —i r-------------------------------------°� — n 1045 —1IU II-1111r-�"' ------------ Il-----------'°ss-----------------'6-----------------------oz FS , e.e z z T ISI ,II "- - —y✓_-------------- O --- _won rm---------------SECTl�I_B__5��EL--------------- H=air ---------- ~ _ - - ULLJ ----- ._________woes___________ _ y— ______ _u�________________— ___ _________ _ems___ ____________,ot>_ m_______________________ I _eom.___ ____________wo_ am ao _1°9°__ __m '- ___________ - ST FINISH F 1055 - -- `" --------°�--- -- ------- ------------eo twa -= t n —-----------°�----------------,K. 1=U ------------ ---------- JW6_________________________]°S________________,rtls_ ----------'°°--------------------------------------------'°a SECTION C SCALE 1/8=1FT 1025 SCALE 1/4 INCH= 1 FT - 0 IN SECTION D -°"-----------------------------'m---------- i' ----ems ,_ I �e LI_______ _ __ __I_.�a� SLI -III I� 1 LII -I II II�II111 II Ilblll�l II III ,� -- - --------------- ----- —------------- — ---------Y _ -- —I — —i r-------------------------------------°� 1045 —1IU II-1111r-�"' ------------ Il-----------'°ss-----------------'6-----------------------oz FS , e.e z z — ISI ,II "- - —y✓_-------------- O --- _won rm---------------SECTl�I_B__5��EL--------------- H=air ---------- ~ _ - - ULLJ ----- Ia N mal 1035 LLJ (n 1030 1025 SCALE 1/4 INCH= 1 FT - 0 IN SECTION D I __--------- 123'_ 1 I i 1 i 1ST FLOOR LEVEL ------------------------------ + � I I A A FF 1046 i AR D� I D D I I 41 1 1 _6• L- 1 i ------------ _------_ON ON CLO ODM 5_ 6mRWM 6 j eYiRHGD RCO.R DpMNER - I - SE RM DN 5pt16.G 'GLA AGE DODP MfING P I.. CMIE ROOM . 3-Y- 24 0 _ _ 5 CLO BASEMENT FF 1045 ON GNGP Bq --_---=— 2 47 - — 9 -. r---------_ -_-6 e � i - •� i RM NDRY FS 46.6 22'-2 OP 7 T - Gnx I I FF 0 7 I c S 46.6 1 Y-4• B'-8• 3'-4- J'-6• 18'-10• 482_8' 24'_2- S' -B' 227_8• 4'-W 123 24'-0" B C 0 0 0 0 0 ssz ssz � r7 BASEMENT PLAN Ovm M DOOR COMPANY ¢r;_An W SOME 1/4•=1' Approved With Conditions By Action of the City of Diamond Bar Planning Commission/City Council Date: �? / / b 1 b� Approved 4: Ordinance number: Resolution number:lnyy//�—�� Case/file number: DR , SITE PLAN Attachment 3 i �m LO a N U ®, U Q Q n N REEK w = CA ® n p P N 59 SQ FT Q CO JT 5576 SQ FT to U a 12.077 IL M 2f 0• A,.n - 1963 SF R) J X = 4028 5F MD L¢L ' A= = 3522 SF 9,513 SQ "MM LU AREA 1802 50 " 1L � (C tE =5 IT BHATIA )7 T -F S j EM Q (� R Ill!] Z :: REEPLASURVEY ® 'Z�z )NA ®m CO )N B& C ::3) Z P LAN PLAN 0 O 01 PLAN Co C J PLAN I 1.EVATIONS LEVATIONS 1.EVATIONS 11 i �m LO a N U z U Q Q n Q< O Z w = M _ 0 O � N S SCALE 1 INCH = 16 FT r Approved V%ii h Conditions By Action of the City of Diamond Bar Planning Commission/City Council Date: Approved by: ;2�Gti2�19 G Ordinance number: Resolution number: 000cl-0-3 Case/file number: Dx 1000-7� t;257 Attachment 3 n rn LO Q N 0 0< O m C4 0 Z Z = O 0:2 Q 0 z In J In F Q Ljj m Cn � SITE PLAN SCALE 1 INCH = 16 FT / �{ S N REEK c CA CO h O- � 89 SO FT Q JT 5576 SQ FT ®D U U O 12.07% IL M � U Arw = 1963 SF J X 4028 SF L.L '•Are. - 3522 6 .In 9,513 SQ FT W AREA 1602 M FT ���� (rT IT BHATIA D7 (rT j Q O S �aLO UZ TREE SURVEY PLAN ® ri W P )NA ®m DNB&C �7Z ra LAN PLAN QLD P PLAN I;— 00 00 J PLAN Iu H I 1EVATIONS 1EVATIONS LEVATIONS 3 n rn LO Q N 0 0< O m C4 0 Z Z = O 0:2 Q 0 z In J In F Q Ljj m Cn � SITE PLAN SCALE 1 INCH = 16 FT / �{ S TOPGRAPHIC SURVEY AND TREE PLAN Q o ®p � P Q LO can U 0 m o. X LL 1c o L w E s O au O z 0O mo of am LLI (n ~ 9LAlf ,- _ ,9•I 1of M T Z Q Q N Q � LOT 1OZES 1 23495, AS 91 MAP BOOM J94 CO RU S OF LEG PAGES 5 THRU 19. PELIX295 OF L09 ANGELES LWNtt. U �. n � N 9LAlf ,- _ ,9•I 1of M T Approved With Conditions By Action of the City of Diamond Bar Planning Commission/City Council Date: �I/bfbq Approved by: Ordinance number: Resolution number: 00nq-03 Case/file number: VACANT SITE NEW INDIAN CREEK ROAD EXISTING RESIDENCE u7 r m N Laj I oa om N 0 ZZ O Q Y W z of n U a N Q Z LJ = — M p _ O N APN 8]713 036 018 SITE PLAN SCALE 1 INCH = 16 FT S L� ADDRESS: CV 2706 INDIAN CREEK IC CC) c DIAMOND BAR, CA ® h M P N LOT AREA 46,189 SO FT Q co BLDG FOOTPRINT 5576 SO FT (4D U 0, LOT COVERAGE 12.079IL � 0' BASEMENT IMNG Area 1963 SF ED J X IST R Are- = M28 SF Qj LL 2ND F M UMNG Are- 3522 SF 9,513 S0 FTan W GARAGE AREA 1802 SO FT L IS ff r OWNER : BASANT BHATIA PH 909 860 1507 Q 0 INDEX TO PLANS G S SITE PLAN T TOPO AND TREE SURVEY ® y n c7 LS LANDSCAPE PLAN n SS SITE SECTION A ® m 00 SS2 SITE SECTION B& C ::2j Z 0, 2 GRADING PLAN 0 0 01 3 BASEMENT PLAN 4 IST FLOOR PLAN 5 2ND FLOOR PLAN LLI 6 ROOF PLAN EL 7 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 8 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 9 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS W H R EXISTING RESIDENCE u7 r m N Laj I oa om N 0 ZZ O Q Y W z of n U a N Q Z LJ = — M p _ O N APN 8]713 036 018 SITE PLAN SCALE 1 INCH = 16 FT S TOPGRAPHIC SURVEY AND TREE PLAN tan s s'� ®SCO <� Q an U 0 Q ol x LL �o ¢n w IL Q au O Rzco ® m z 0 �p O a J Lu E. N EL � 7 U p1 N C¢j O ¢ O m N O Z Z = O 0:2 D SCALP f = 15• I ) M- T x Q Z WT 102, TRACT 23981, AS RECOROEO IN MAP SOOK M. m � PAM 5 TNRII 19, RECMDS M LOS ANOEI£S CWNW. � r � N SCALP f = 15• I ) M- T Attachment 5 Co w ~ W_ J U L Q J w CD L¢L z 7 O W y U) w W O Df W W M U O 0] = d Y d J o O = U o > LU W Co W F z —_ O ❑ S M M ` U O a a SS Co w ~ W_ J U L Q J w CD L¢L z 7 O W y U) w ID z —_ O K � Q � U O J z Q J W W U) J � J W U If O U - Y U Q m W w U) i K O T All U U U U U U U E E E E E E E C O c a O U O U O U O. U O U O U `0 `o `o U Cl) a) p N N N N N N N N N 0 N 0 0 0 3 N 'V w 'iC '�. '� @ @ N N @ N @ @ @ N @ N @ L op @ N d @ z @ Y @ N z @ �, z- N Z o C @ Z C @ @ Z- w cn w cn .`. cn L cn .i- U) .L- cA c z z z z z z z C @ C @ @ -L' O C C C C F- F- F I- d �' o L C n- @ @ @ @-,il O@ N -,J F N a' N F" N N O I- O I- @ O O N C O N O O@ N N N N N to N m`@ o�Fa�t�--�� � 0�0FH00 �ooFo��c @ cl 92cc�c���•0y�c ���•0c �0000000000�00� z z - (1) z ani z m z z z> 2 ¢>¢ cr¢>(n>¢ >¢ UU U F -(A ILU)(nF-(A >(n¢(n¢ ¢F->(nI- I-�•-� .�•-�'+��•-I-�:..> C @ C @ w O O w � C @ N Y t L @ C L❑L to @ a O O[C p ' o O @ C > > n O N N a C s - Oma �p• L a- o) ❑L mm mo L) a 0 0 aa N @ a@ N > m N C a) > N m m C a 0�1 > @ @ C @ ? a a (n d N m a m y C O m a m m _ E a : C C @ C @ ` C L ` L �. p_ N C @ m > > � 'C @@ L C. �. L L L @ U "C. "MW L L� p L O L @ C m @ U C N U` m ❑ IY/� C v/ @ U m❑ ❑ m m N@@ >>> C U) .- N L O U N @ �- ❑❑ �- C @ a) m a C O a C o a C ¢ ¢ a @ m ❑ a) L �I1 �// @ U Q a Ci ❑,,@^^ a _ V Z U) @ N @ (n .o @ L .�, @ 0 a C m (n •0 (n (� cn a N L @ (� ❑ m a N C @ a a C C¢¢¢ C fn N O p @ -p @@ F'- a E E O a C G a @ C C C C C ,br U @ C a C a C a C @ C a C`@ ❑ C U C O@ @ 2, C @ >�, C C-❑ O@` C C C O @ C O 0-0,0-0-0 a a �7i @ C C N O@ U C @ @ E N N C w N ,a O O@ @ CD O1. aI :f. w w @ -o p E L N �'-C @'o E *' `° @ @ .o E N N@@` a' o f -o N Y E E c c c o y @ +-' '° > w ,c Y C C c c o @ L O �° (7 O E In m C @ m m > wEommm@04m`m°ma) to a L L L a_mC7oCD(D C M > co(DCD0w0C9w Y @o!�@`mo@m o❑c7owGw0❑(D(DCD 0 M Y `m@.m@o@'gmLLLC9@ (n O N O [t (D O cT N N O) M I� (p O @@@ O O O 0 /n Y N O o C 0 � ° a @ c� cn @ a @@ da > E cn @ U) ❑ �. O ,�, w o Y U w o 1@ U o y o Y U o X U ❑ y... w d(�C9oowrn oL fAaC9aa_[L(D(D❑a_0n L" N 0 1:1 0 Ip O O CO r (O O CO O O m N (D N M m O (n O m r r 0 (f) In 1l- Lo N N V O O m Cl) m Cl) t0 m O D O O O m O M m LL7 Cl) m N '�' I� N In (O 0 V' 0 V o •d' N Il- In d' 0 0 N M O d' 1,- O N 'V• CO M LO 11 O l0 N (N N I- d' r r M Cl) N d' r Ct v m r u� U O o �Y I� t r r W r N V' r d' r r r N co r (D (D �-- _y U r O.0 N I- r r d- �' t` (` O V' . O L r O m O m U O O a m> O m O L N CY r N M M N CO CO r M M V M V N r CY N Q M N r N r N r N r N r N r r N N N M r N �- N N N N N N N N m N N N N N C m@ N N N @ p`) O m L @@ Z O C L O N O 7 O m 0 E rn 0 0 0 0 o a U U N m r o 0 0 r N U❑ P N M m e w U I@ c I R L I m l N L O O O O O b O o O c O o O c 0` ._ IYEn�YWcl) E � a E ` W O L w �0 00 0 .F. L @ N L @ c C N ON ON N E E O E E @ am C O Co (D p @ A E U @L@ E 0 @ O EC O O O O O O O O p O s 0 O O O O U7 O O O p O a- Fu Fu p O o OCO 0 Y 0 0 O O yO C C O O _ - - OUO p a YLN WOL O c� ON Y w r_ @ C L O n = aL L _.""• O I_ .0 _C 6 = O p O c p Oty FJm mm(n MmmD mO Omnm > Im dmmn' U) I (40 U U J C 0 d' ro a N CD m co O r O. 7 O N Oi Oi U) 10 (D C @ No z oM 0 Lo 0 00 E Cl) w �� DD C C CO aa) aCD Q O O N O 00 O +' t6 co O r r M r r O D_ r O IL N O Cl)' r L I M O co, O m m U r C O r O N (D (Yl N a @ CO (O N o m i i i W' 0) r O O N O N O M lD O OO N m (D (D !Y > M m ' ❑ �mrnrnrn C) o �� Etr �O o0 ��o In o 0 0 ❑ 00No 0 �tY�tY a' o ❑ ❑ �❑¢� a_K ¢¢ W'�j K ❑ K ❑ ❑ a r r IN C) no a >o n❑ »❑a CoV a r¢��a ZZ O (D M d' V O r IN C) ((7 d' m (D N r r O m m O D- In O CD 0 (h N' 0 0 I` Cl) O O N O �' O m m 0 C�'7 0 (h °� 0 m (O O I� O (o r r N O (D (D (mj r O (+m') d0' 7 Cy O ) p I i p) (? W N J C O r 0 0 �' O 'R N O r r r r r r r (D (D CD (D 0 y\- Vim" m - tf] (!7 O �- LC) l� C N N ID CV M N lD lf) CD (D V (O (D CD (D (� m O mtco O O m O m O O O O m O O 7 •i O N m m N m V m C' m (O m m t0 (D m m CD m (D (D m m CO m (D m m m m O❑ m C7 C) O O{ w 0 0 0 0 0 0 lD 0 0 0 ?j O O O O O O O I� O O O O O O O N N � a Z a a w r w w a n a n a r r r a U r w O m a 0 N a a a o ��a.7-�❑❑�tl� a a a w n o a ❑ W ❑ d ❑ d ❑❑ d O a N a_� o_ N 0_ N a_ N a_ N 0_ N a_ d7 a 0 ❑a..a L ❑❑U ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑0 D❑❑7❑❑ ❑0❑D40 da_a_❑❑0-�❑� U UU a_U a. a_ a- 0_ a_ a. a.0 Uao-�UU� UUU¢U¢UUUUUU¢¢QUr.¢a- Eta- UUa.a.000Ua_UU❑UUUa_� U U U