Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC 2008-15PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 2007-35, MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2008-05 AND CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, FOR A REQUEST TO CONVERT AN EXISTING GARAGE TO 560 SQUARE FEET OF LIVABLE AREA AND CONSTRUCT A FOUR -CAR GARAGE AND TENNIS COURT IN THE REAR YARD AT AN EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 2759 STEEPLECHASE LANE - APN: 8713-018-012. A. RECITALS. The property owner, Ms. Dong Hong, and applicant, Mr. David Y. Hu have filed an application for Development Review No. 2007-35 and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2008-05 for a property located at 2759 Steeplechase Lane, Diamond Bar, Los Angeles County, California. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review, Minor Conditional Use Permit and categorical exemption shall be referred to as the "Application." 2. Public hearing notices were mailed to approximately 47 property owners within a 500 -foot radius of the project site, the public notice was posted in three public places and the project site was posted with a display board. Notification of the public hearing for this project was provided in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers. 3. On April 22, 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted and concluded a duly noticed public hearing on the Application. B. RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: This Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. The Planning Commission hereby finds that the project identified above in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), under Class 1, Section 15301(e) of the CEQA Guidelines promulgated thereunder. Exemptions under Class 1, Section 15301(e) include additions to existing structures of less than 10,000 square feet in urbanized areas that are not environmentally sensitive. 3. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds and determines that, having considered the record as a whole including the findings set forth below, and changes and alterations which have been incorporated into and conditioned upon the proposed project set forth in the application, there is no evidence before this Planning Commission that the project proposed herein will have the potential of an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Based upon substantial evidence, this Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effects contained in Section 753.5 (d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 4. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein, this Planning Commission hereby finds as follows: a. Development Review (1) The design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, development standards of the applicable zone district, design guidelines, and architectural criteria for specialized areas (e.g., specific plans, community plans, boulevards, or planned developments.) On July 25, 1995, the City adopted its General Plan. The project site was established and homes were built prior to the City's incorporation and General Plan's adoption. The General Plan land use designation for the project site is Rural Residential-Maximum1 DU/AC (RR). This General Plan designation allow for lot of one acre or more for the development of a single-family residence. The project site is an existing legal lot of record which is 1.27 acres and developed with a single-family residence. Therefore, the project site is in compliance with the adopted General Plan. The project site is in the R-1-20,000- Minimum Lot Size 20,000 Square Feet zoning district. As prescribed in the Development Code, the development standards of the RR zoning district apply to the project site. The proposed project meets all the development standards of this zoning district as illustrated in the comparison matrix within the staff report except for the nonconforming front yard setbacks which require approval of Minor Conditional Use Permit. (See Minor Conditional Use Permit and Nonconforming findings discussed below.) The proposed 560 square foot of garage conversion to livable space does not change the existing architectural style of the residence. However, it changes the size of the residence from 2,558 to 3,118 square feet and removes the garage doors and replaces them with two windows that match the style of the residence's existing windows. The stucco color, tile roof and wood frim color and style will match existing. Additionally, the proposed garage will match the existing residence's architectural style, colors and materials. As a result, staff finds that the proposed project is consistent with the subject 2 Development Review No. 2007-35 residence and other residences in the Country Estates which are diverse in size, style, and colors, and materials used. (2) The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. With the approval and construction of the proposed project, the current use of the project site as a single-family residence will be maintained. As discussed in Development Review Finding (1) above, the proposed project can be accommodated at the project site. Additionally, the architectural style, colors and materials are compatible with other homes in the neighborhood. As such, the proposed project is not expected to interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future development. The proposed project is not expected to intensify the existing use to an extent that will create traffic or pedestrian hazards. (3) The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the characteristics of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22.48 Diamond Bar Development Code, the General Plan, City Design Guidelines, or any applicable specific plan. As discussed in Finding (1) above, the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan, development standards of the RR zoning district and the City's Design Guidelines. As a result, the proposed addition is compatible with the characteristics of the neighborhood and will maintain a harmonious, orderly and attractive development. There is no specific plan for the project area. (4) The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public, as well as its neighbors, through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, and color that will remain aesthetically appealing. As discussed in Findings (1), (2), and (3) above, the proposed project will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture and color while offering variety in color and texture and a low level of maintenance. (5) The proposed project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious (e.g., negative affect on property values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3 Development Review No. 2007-35 Before the issuance of any City permits, the proposed project is required to comply with all conditions within the approved resolution and the Building and Safety Division, Public Works Department, and Fire Department requirements. The referenced agencies, through the permit and inspection process, will ensure that the proposed project is not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. b. Minor Conditional Use Permit to Maintain Existing Nonconforming Side Setbacks (1) The proposed use is allowed within the subject zoning district with the approval of a Minor Conditional Use Permit and complies with all other applicable provisions of the Development Code and Municipal Code. As stated in Development Review Findings (9) and (2) above, the proposed garage conversion to 560 square feet of livable area and construct a tennis court and four -car garage in the rear yard is allowed within the RR zoning district. According to the development standards matrix in the staff report, the proposed project complies with all applicable Development Code standards for the RR zoning district except for the nonconforming front yard setback which is a minimum of 26 feet located in the area in front of the garage conversion. The City recognizes that property owners should be allowed to add or make improvements to their properties, even with nonconformities. Therefore, the City has established the Minor Conditional Use Permit process for such additions with required additional findings of fact in the resolution. The legal nonconformities may be continued to secure safety or when advantages through improved architecture are met. The applicant is requesting to maintain the 26 foot front yard setback where the garage conversion will occurin orderto add 560 square feet of livable area. The proposed addition, four - car garage and tennis court will improve the subject property even with the nonconformity. Furthermore, it is not unusual for front yard setbacks to be less than 30 feet in the Country Estates due to previous code requirements. Therefore, staff finds that approving the Minor Conditional Use Permit as described above is appropriate for this project. (2) The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan. 4 Development Review No. 2007-35 As discussed in Development Review Finding (1) above, the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. There is no applicable specific plan for the area where the proposed project is located. (3) The design, location, size and operating characteristics of the proposed use are compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity. The proposed project does not change the use or operating characteristics of the existing residence. As discussed above in Development Review Findings (1) and (2) above, and Minor Conditional Use Permit Finding (1) above, the proposed project's design, location and size are compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. (4) The subject site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of use being proposed including access, provision of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and the absence of physical constraints. The proposed project meets all the required development standards for the RR zoning district. The project site will maintain the existing use of a single-family residence and is large enough to accommodate the proposed addition. Additionally, the proposed project does not intensify the use or increase the density of the project site. Furthermore, the proposed project does not necessitate a change in site access or provision of utilities. (5) Granting the Minor Conditional Use Permit will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property or improvements in the vicinity and zoning district in which the property is located. Building Code compliance, structural plan check, City permits and inspections are required for construction. These processes will ensure that the finished project will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity and zoning district in which the property is located. C. Nonconforming Front Yard Setback (1) The proposed project is compatible with other structures in the neighborhood. 5 Development Review No. 2007-35 (2) The proposed 560 square -foot conversion of garage area to livable space does not change the existing architectural style of the residence. However, it changes the size of the residence from 2,558 to 3,118 square feet and removes the garage doors and replaces them with two windows that match the style of the residence's existing windows. The stucco color, the roof and wood trim colorand style will match existing. Additionally, the proposed garage will match the existing residence's architectural style, colors and materials. Furthermore, it is not unusual for front yard setbacks to be less than 30 feet in the Country Estates due to previous code requirements. As a result, staff finds that the proposed project is consistent with the subject residence and other residences in the Country Estates which are diverse in size, style, and colors, and materials used. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan. As discussed in Development Review Finding (1) above, the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. There is not an applicable specific plan for area where the proposed project is located. (3) The proposed project will not result in the restriction of the eventual/future compliance with the applicable regulations of the Development Code. Approval of the Minor Conditional Use Permit, which will permit the continuation of the nonconforming front yard setback, will not result in restricting future compliance with the applicable Diamond Bar Development Code regulations. (4) The proposed project will not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of persons residing in the neighborhood. Based on Minor Conditional Use Permit Finding (5) discussed above and conditions of approval, the proposed project will not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of persons residing in the neighborhood. (5) The proposed project will not be detrimental and/or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood. Based on all Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit Findings discussed above and conditions of approval, 6 Development Review No. 2007-35 the proposed project will not be detrimental and/or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood. 5l. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth above, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Application subject to the following conditions and Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated by reference: a. Planning Division 1. Prior to final inspection or Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall replace any landscaping and irrigation destroyed or damaged in the front yard. 2. Prior to plan check submittal, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan and floor plan for the proposed four -car garage showing that the garage in not located in the sewer easement, interior width measurement is 20 feet and the total square footage of the garage does not exceed 1,000 square feet. 3. Prior to plan check submittal, the applicant shall submit a detail of the tennis court lighting and fencing for Planning Division review and approval. 4. The proposed flat roof of the garage is prohibited. Prior to plan check submittal, the applicant shall submit a revised elevations and roof plan showing a pitched garage roof that is compatible with the existing residence and the proposed roof section of the garage that is pitched. b. Public Works Department Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall submit a complete hydrology and hydraulic study, prepared by a Civil Engineer registered in the State of California to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Los Angeles Public Works Department. C. Building and Safety Division 1. Smoke detectors shall be in conformance with the 2007 California Building Code. 2. All bedrooms shall comply with all rescue window requirements. 7 Development Review No. 2007-35 3. Building setback for any slope (toe or top) shall meet Chapter 18 of the 2007 California Building Code. 4. Construction plans shall specify 5/8" type X between the garage and house addition and 1 3/8" solid core self-closing door between the house and garage. 5. An application, for which no permit is issued within 180 days following the date of application, shall expire by limitation, and plans and other data submitted for review may thereafter be returned to the applicant or destroyed by the Building and Safety Division. 6. Every permit issued by the Building and Safety Division shall expire if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit. 7. In order to accurately monitor and report all construction, debris generation and diversion activities, all materials shall be hauled and processed by a City franchised contractor or by a licensed demolition contractor subject to compliance with specific permitting and reporting requirements. Additionally, Southern California Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) approval and clearance shall be required prior to issuance of a demolition permit. 8. Applicant shall submit five full sets of plans, including the grading plan, to the Building and Safety Division after the plans have been approved by the Planning Commission. 9. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a full set of plans to the Walnut Valley Unified School District and shall pay required school fees. 10. Foundation systems on expansive soil shall be constructed in a manner that minimizes damage to the structure from movement of soil. Depth of the foundation below the natural and finish grade shall not be less than 24 inches for exterior and 18 inches for interior foundations. 11. To eliminate safety hazards on existing pools and spas and in accordance to the Health and Safety Code, Section 115928(d), the applicant shall install anti -entrapment cover whenever a building permit is issued for all remodeling or modification at a single-family home. 8 Development Review No. 2007-35 'The Planning Commission shall. (a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and (b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, to: Ms. Dong Hong, 2759 Steeplechase Lane, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 and Mr. David Y. Hu, 18071 Arenth Avenue, City of Industry, CA 91748. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND OF APRIL 2008, BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. BY: Steve Nelson, Chairman I, Nancy Fong, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of April 2008, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners: Noun, Lee, Shah, VC/Torng, Chair/Nelson NOES: Commissioners: None ABSTAIN: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: None ATTEST: I b� Nan y Fong, S cr tary 9 Development Review No. 2007-35 DI�1IOfiD BARI'J COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS USE PERMITS, COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL NEW AND REMODELED STRUCTURES PROJECT #: Development Review No. 2007-5 and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2008-08 SUBJECT: Convert an existing garage to 560 square feet of livable area and construct a four -car garage and tennis court in the rear PROPERTY OWNER: Ms. Dong Hong APPLICANT: Mr. David Y. Hu LOCATION: 2759 Steeplechase Lane ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION AT (909) 839-7030, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements In accordance with Government Code Section 66474.9(b) (1), the applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, and its officers, agents and employees, from any claim, action, or proceeding to attack, set-aside, void or annul, the approval of Development Review No. 2007-35 and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2008-05 brought within the time period provided by Government Code Section 66499.37. In the event the city and/or its officers, agents and employees are made a party of any such action: (a) Applicant shall provide a defense to the City defendants or at the City's option reimburse the City its costs of defense, including reasonable attorneys fees, incurred in defense of such claims. (b) Applicant shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against the City descendents. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action of proceeding, and shall cooperate fully in the defense thereof. 10 Development Review No. 2007-35 2. This approval shall not be effective for any purpose until the applicant and owner of the property involved have filed, within twenty-one (21) days of approval of this Development Review No. 2007-35 and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2008-05 at the City of Diamond Bar Community Development Department, their affidavit stating that they are aware of and agree to accept all the conditions of this approval. Further, this approval shall not be effective until the applicants pay remaining City processing fees, school fees and fees for the review of submitted reports. 3. All designers, architects, engineers, and contractors associated with this project shall obtain a Diamond Bar Business License and zoning approval for those businesses located in Diamond Bar. 4. Signed copies of Planning Commission Resolution No. 2008-15 Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 5. Prior to plan check, revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval. 6. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval shall be completed 7. The project site shall be maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of approval and all laws, or other applicable regulations. 8. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and any applicable Specific Plan in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 9. Site, grading, landscape/irrigation and driveway plans, elevations and sections shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of City permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.,) or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 10. The single family residence shall not be used in a manner that creates adverse effects upon the neighborhood and environmental setting of the residential site to levels of dust, glare/light, noise, odor, traffic, or other disturbances to the existing residential neighborhood and shall not result in significantly adverse effects on public services and resources. The single family residence shall not be used for commercial/institutional purposes, or otherwise used as a separate dwelling. The property shall not be used for regular gatherings which result in a nuisance or which create traffic and parking problems in the neighborhood. 11 Development Review No. 2007-35 11. Property owner/applicant shall remove the public hearing notice board within three days of this project's approval. 12. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of City Planning, Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works Department, and Fire Department. B. Fees/Deposits Applicant shall pay development fees (including but not limited to Planning, Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works Department and Mitigation Monitoring) at the established rates, prior to issuance of building or grading permit (whichever comes first), as required by the City. School fees as required shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permit. In addition, the applicant shall pay all remaining prorated City project review and processing fees prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever come first. 1'.. Prior to any plan check, all deposit accounts for the processing of this project shall have no deficits. C. Time Limits The approval of Development Review No. 2007-35 and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2008-05 shall expire within two years from the date of approval if the use has not been exercised as defined per Municipal Code Section 22.66.050 (b)(1). The applicant may request in writing a one year time extension subject to Municipal Code Section 22.60.050(c) for Planning Commission approval. D. Site Development The project site shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the approved plans submitted to, approved, and amended herein by the Planning Commission, collectively labeled and referenced herein as Exhibit "A" dated April 22, 2008, including: site plan, floor plan, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors and landscaping/irrigation plan on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein and Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to the issuance of any permits, the Applicant shall complete and record a "Covenant and Agreement to Maintain a Single -Family Residence" on a form to be provided by the City. The covenant shall be completed and recorded with the Los Angeles County Recorders Office. E. Solid Waste The site shall be maintained in a condition, which is free of debris both during and after the construction, addition, or implementation of the entitlement approved herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether 12 Development Review No. 2007-35 during or subsequent to construction shall be done only by the property owner, applicant or by a duly permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste from residential, commercial, construction, and industrial areas within the City. It shall be the applicant's obligation to insure that the waste contractor used has obtained permits from the City of Diamond Bar to provide such services. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, (909) 839-7040, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General An Erosion Control Plan shall be submitted prior to the issuance of any City permits. These measures shall be implemented during construction between October 1 st and April 15th. The erosion control plan shall conform to national Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards and incorporate the appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP's) as specified in the Storm Water BMP Certification. For construction activity which disturbs one acre or greater of Storm Water Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be needed. Please refer to City handout. 2. The applicant shall comply with Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) requirements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Please refer to City handouts. 3. Grading and construction activities and the transportation of equipment and materials and operation of heavy grading equipment shall be limited to between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. Dust generated by grading and construction activities shall be reduced by watering the soil prior to and during the activities and in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 402 and Rule 403. Reclaimed water shall be used whenever possible. Additionally, all construction equipment shall be properly muffled to reduce noise levels. 4. All equipment staging areas shall be located on the project site. Staging area, including material stockpile and equipment storage area, shall be enclosed within a six foot -high chain link fence. All access points in the defense shall be locked whenever the construction site is not supervised. B. Drainage Detailed drainage system information of the lot with careful attention to any flood hazard area shall be submitted. All drainage/runoff from the development shall be conveyed from the site to the natural drainage course. No on-site drainage shall be conveyed to adjacent parcels, unless that is the natural drainage course. 13 Development Review No. 2007-35 C. Soils Report/Grading/Retaining Walls Prior to grading plan submittal, a geotechnical report prepared by a Geotechnical Engineer, licensed by the State of California, shall be submitted by the applicant for approval by the City. 2. Upon approval of the geotechnical report, the applicant shall submit drainage and grading plans prepared by a Civil Engineer, licensed by the State of California, prepared in accordance with the City's requirements for the City's review and approval. A list of requirements for grading plan check is available from the Public Works Department. All grading (cut and fill) calculations shall be submitted to the City concurrently with the grading plan. 3. Finished slopes shall conform to City Code Section 22.22.080 -Grading. 4. All easements and flood hazard areas shall be clearly identified on the grading plan. 51. The grading plan shall show the location of any retaining walls and the elevations of the top of wall/footing/retaining and the finished grade on both sides of the retaining wall. Construction details for retaining walls shall be shown on the grading plan. Calculations and details of retaining walls shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for review and approval. 6. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the California Building Code, City Grading Ordinance, Hillside Management Ordinance and acceptable grading practices. 7. The maximum grade of driveways serving building pad areas shall be 15 percent. In hillside areas driveway grades exceeding 15 percent shall have parking landings with a minimum 16 feet deep and shall not exceed five (5) percent grade or as required by the City Engineer. Driveways with a slope of 15 percent shall incorporate grooves for traction into the construction as required by the City Engineer. 8. All slopes shall be seeded per landscape plan and/or fuel modification plan with native grasses or planted with ground cover, shrubs, and trees for erosion control upon completion of grading or some other alternative method of erosion control shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and a permanent irrigation system shall be installed. 9. Submit a stockpile plan showing the proposed location for stockpile for grading export materials, and the route of transport. '10. Rough grade certifications by project soils engineer shall be submitted prior to issuance of building permits forthe foundation of the residential structure. Retaining wall permits may be issued without a rough grade certificate. 14 Development Review No. 2007-35 11. Final grade certifications by project soils and civil engineers shall be submitted to the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of any project final inspections/certificate of occupancy respectively. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 839-7020, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Plans shall conform to State and Local Building Code (i.e., 2007 California Building Code, California Plumbing Code, California Mechanical Code, and 2004 National Electrical Code) requirements and all other applicable construction codes, ordinances and regulations in effect at plan check submittal. 2. Before construction begins, the applicant shall install temporary construction fencing pursuant to the Building and Safety Division's requirements along the project site's perimeter. This fencing shall remain until the Building Official approves its removal. The Applicant shall provide temporary sanitation facilities while under construction. 3. Fire Department approval may be required. Contact the Fire Department to check the fire zone for the location of your property. If this project is located in High Hazard Fire Zone it shall meet of requirements of the fire zone. a. All unenclosed under -floor areas shall be constructed as exteriorwall. b. All openings into the attic, floor and/or other enclosed areas shall be covered with corrosion -resistant wire mesh not less than 1/4 inch or more than 112 inch in any dimension except where such openings are equipped with sash or door. 4. The minimum design load for wind in this area is 80 M.P.H. exposures "C" and the site is within seismic zone four (4). The applicant shall submit drawings and calculations prepared by a California State licensed Architect/Engineer with wet stamp and signature. 5. The project shall comply with energy conservation requirements of the State of California Energy Commission. Bathroom lights shall be fluorescent or controlled by a manual-on/auto off occupant sensor. 6. Check drainage patterns with Engineering Department. Surface water shall drain away from building at a 2% minimum slope. 7. Plans shall specify location of tempered glass as required by code. 8. The number of plumbing fixtures shall be in compliance with CBC Appendix 29. 15 Development Review No. 2007-35 9. The project shall be protected by a construction fence and shall comply with the NPDES & BMP requirements (sand bags, etc.) 10. A height survey may be required at completion of framing. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE PREVENTION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Emergency access shall be provided, maintaining free and clear, a minimum 28 foot at all times during construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. 2'. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be submitted to the Fire Department that temporary water supply for fire protection is available pending completion of the required fire protection system. 3. All required fire hydrants shall be installed and tested and accepted prior to construction. Vehicular access must be provided and maintained serviceable throughout construction. End 16 Development Review No. 2007-35 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 2007- 35, MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2008-05 AND CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, FOR A REQUEST TO CONVERT AN EXISTING GARAGE TO 560 SQUARE FEET OF LIVABLE AREA AND CONSTRUCT A FOUR-CAR GARAGE AND TENNIS COURT IN THE REAR YARD AT AN EXISTING SINGLE -FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 2759 STEEPLECHASE LANE - APN: 8713-018-012. A. RECITALS. 1. The property owner, Ms. Dong Hong, and applicant, Mr. David Y. Hu have filed an ;application for Development Review No. 2007- 35 and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2008-05 for a property located at 2759 Steeplechase Lane, Diamond Bar, Los Angeles County, California. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review, Minor Conditional Use Permit and categorical exemption shall be referred to as the "Application." 2. Public hearing notices were mailed to approximately 47 property owners within a 500-foot radius of the project site, the public notice was posted in three public places and the project site was posted with a display board. Notification of the public hearing for this project was provided in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers. 3. On April 22, 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted and concluded a duly noticed public hearing on the Application. B. RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: 1. This Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. The Planning Commission hereby finds that the project identified above in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), under Class 1, Section 15301(e) of the CEQA Guidelines promulgated thereunder. Exemptions under Class 1, Section 15301(e) include additions to existing structures of less than 10,000 square feet in urbanized areas that are not environmentally sensitive. 3. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds and determines that, having considered the record as a whole including the findings set forth below, and changes and alterations which have been incorporated into and conditioned upon the proposed project set forth in the application, there is no evidence before this Planning Commission that the project proposed herein will have the potential of an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Based upon substantial evidence, this Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effects contained in Section 753.5 (d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 4. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein, this Planning Commission hereby finds as follows: a. Development Review (1) The design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, development standards of the applicable zone district, design guidelines, and architectural criteria for specialized areas (e.g., specific plans, community plans, boulevards, or planned developments.) On July 25, 1995, the City adopted its General Plan. The project site was established and homes were built prior to the City's incorporation and General Plan's adoption. The General Plan land use designation for the project site is Rural Residential-Maximuml DU/AC (RR). This General Plan designation allow for lot of one acre or more for the development of a single -family residence. The project site is an existing legal lot of record which is 1.27 acres and developed with a single -family residence. Therefore, the project site is in compliance with the adopted General Plan. The project site is in the R-1-20,000- Minimum Lot Size 20,000 Square Feet zoning district. As prescribed in the Development Code, the development standards of the RR zoning district apply to the project site. The proposed project meets all the development standards of this zoning district as illustrated in the comparison matrix within the staff report except for the nonconforming front yard setbacks which require approval of a Minor Conditional Use Permit. (See Minor Conditional Use Permit and Nonconforming findings discussed below.) The proposed 560 square foot of garage conversion to livable space does not change the existing architectural style of the residence. However, it changes the size of the residence from 2,558 to 3,118 square feet and removes the garage doors and replaces them with two windows that match the style of the residence's existing windows. The stucco color, tile roof and wood trim color and style will match existing. Additionally, the proposed garage will match the existing residence's architectural style, colors and materials. As a result, staff finds that the proposed project is consistent with the subject 2 Development Review No. 2007-35 residence and other residences in the Country Estates which are diverse in size, style, and colors, and materials used. (2) The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. With the approval and construction of the proposed project, the current use of the project site as a single -family residence will be maintained. As discussed in Development Review Finding (1) above, the proposed project can be accommodated at the project site. Additionally, the architectural style, colors and materials are compatible with other homes in the neighborhood. As such, the proposed project is not expected to interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future development. The proposed project is not expected to intensify the existing use to an extent that will create traffic or pedestrian hazards. (3) The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the characteristics of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22.48 Diamond Bar Development Code, the General Plan, City Design Guidelines, or any applicable specific plan. As discussed in Finding (1) above, the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan, development standards of the RR zoning district and the City's Design Guidelines. As a result, the proposed addition is compatible with the characteristics of the neighborhood and will maintain a harmonious, orderly and attractive development. There is no specific plan for the project area. (4) The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public, as well as its neighbors, through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, and color that will remain aesthetically appealing. As discussed in Findings (1), (2), and (3) above, the proposed project will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture and color while offering variety in color and texture and a low level of maintenance. (5) The proposed project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious (e.g., negative affect on property values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3 Development Review No. 2007-35 Before the issuance of any City permits, the proposed project is required to comply with all conditions within the approved resolution and the Building and Safety Division, Public Works Department, and Fire Department requirements. The referenced agencies, through the permit and inspection process, will ensure that the proposed project is not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. b. Minor Conditional Use Permit to Maintain Existing Nonconforming Side Setbacks (1) The proposed use is allowed within the subject zoning district with the approval of a Minor Conditional Use Permit and complies with all other applicable provisions of the Development Code and Municipal Code. As stated in Development Review Findings (I) and (2) above, the proposed garage conversion to 560 square feet of livable area and construct a tennis court and four -car garage in the rear yard is allowed within the RR zoning district. According to the development standards matrix in the staff report, the proposed project complies with all applicable Development Code standards for the RR zoning district except for the nonconforming front yard setback which is a minimum of 26 feet located in the area in front of the garage conversion. The City recognizes that property owners should be allowed to add or make improvements to their properties, even with nonconformities. Therefore, the City has established the Minor Conditional Use Permit process for such additions with required additional findings of fact in the resolution. The legal nonconformities may be continued to secure safety or when advantages through improved architecture are met. The applicant is requesting to maintain the 26 foot front yard setback where the garage conversion will occur in order to add 560 square feet of livable area. The proposed addition, fourcar garage and tennis court will improve the subject property even with the nonconformity. Furthermore, it is not unusual for front yard setbacks to be less than 30 feet in the Country Estates due to previous code requirements. Therefore, staff finds that approving the Minor Conditional Use Permit as described above is appropriate for this project. (2) The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan. 4 Development Review No. 2007-35 As discussed in Development Review Finding (1) above, the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. There is no applicable specific plan for the area where the proposed project is located. (3) The design, location, size and operating characteristics of the proposed use are compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity. The proposed project does not change the use or operating characteristics of the existing residence. As discussed above in Development Review Findings (1) and (2) above, and Minor Conditional Use Permit Finding (1) above, the proposed project's design, location and size are compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. (4) The subject site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of use being proposed including access, provision of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and the absence of physical constraints. The proposed project meets all the required development standards for the RR zoning district. The project site will maintain the existing use of a single-family residence and is large enough to accommodate the proposed addition. Additionally, the proposed project does not intensify the use or increase the density of the project site. Furthermore, the proposed project does not necessitate a change in site access or provision of utilities. (5) Granting the Minor Conditional Use Permit will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property or improvements in the vicinity and zoning district in which the property is located. Building Code compliance, structural plan check, City permits and inspections are required for construction. These processes will ensure that the finished project will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity and zoning district in which the property is located. C. Nonconforming Front Yard Setback (1) The proposed project is compatible with other structures in the neighborhood. 5 Development Review No. 2007-35 The proposed 560 square -foot conversion of garage area to livable space does not change the existing architectural style of the residence. However, it changes the size of the residence from 2,558 to 3,118 square feet and removes the garage doors and replaces them with two windows that match the style of the residence's existing windows. The stucco color, tile roof and wood trim color and style will match existing. Additionally, the proposed garage will match the existing residence's architectural style, colors and materials. Furthermore, it is not unusual for front yard setbacks to be less than 30 feet in the Country Estates due to previous code requirements. As a result, staff finds that the proposed project is consistent with the subject residence and other residences in the Country Estates which are diverse in size, style, and colors, and materials used. (2) The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan. As discussed in Development Review Finding (1) above, the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. There is not an applicable specific plan for area where the proposed project is located. (3) The proposed project will not result in the restriction of the eventual/future compliance with the applicable regulations of the Development Code. Approval of the Minor Conditional Use Permit, which will permit the continuation of the nonconforming front yard setback, will not result in restricting future compliance with the applicable Diamond Bar Development Code regulations. (4) The proposed project will not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of persons residing in the neighborhood. Based on Minor Conditional Use Permit Finding (5) discussed above and conditions of approval, the proposed project will not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of persons residing in the neighborhood. (5) The proposed project will not be detrimental and/or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood. Based on all Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit Findings discussed above and conditions of approval, 6 Development Review No. 2007-35 the proposed project will not be detrimental and/or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood. 5. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth above, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Application subject to the following conditions and Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated by reference: a. Planning Division 1. Prior to final inspection or Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall replace any landscaping and irrigation destroyed or damaged in the front yard. 2. Prior to plan check submittal, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan and floor plan for the proposed four -car garage showing that the garage in not located in the sewer easement, interior width measurement is 20 feet and the total square footage of the garage does not exceed 1,000 square feet. 3. Prior to plan check submittal, the applicant shall submit a detail of the tennis court lighting and fencing for Planning Division review and approval. 4. The proposed flat roof of the garage is prohibited. Prior to plan check submittal, the applicant shall submit a revised elevations and roof plan showing a pitched garage roof that is compatible with the existing residence and the proposed roof section of the garage that is pitched. b. Public Works Department 1. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall submit a complete hydrology and hydraulic study, prepared by a Civil Engineer registered in the State of California to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Los Angeles Public Works Department. C. Building and Safety Division 1. Smoke detectors shall be in conformance with the 2007 California Building Code. 2. All bedrooms shall comply with all rescue window requirements. 7 Development Review No. 2007-35 3. Building setback for any slope (toe or top) shall meet Chapter 18 of the 2007 California Building Code. 4. Construction plans shall specify 5/8" type X between the garage and house addition and 1 3/8" solid core self-closing door between the house and garage. 5. An application, for which no permit is issued within 180 days following the date of application, shall expire by limitation, and plans and other data submitted for review may thereafter be returned to the applicant or destroyed by the Building and Safety Division. 6. Every permit issued by the Building and Safety Division shall expire if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit. 7 In order to accurately monitor and report all construction, debris generation and diversion activities, all materials shall be hauled and processed by a City franchised contractor or by a licensed demolition contractor subject to compliance with specific permitting and reporting requirements. Additionally, Southern California Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) approval and clearance shall be required prior to issuance of a demolition permit. 8. Applicant shall submit five full sets of plans, including the grading plan, to the Building and Safety Division after the plans have been approved by the Planning Commission. 9. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a full set of plans to the Walnut Valley Unified School District and shall pay required school fees. 10. Foundation systems on expansive soil shall be constructed in a manner that minimizes damage to the structure from movement of soil. Depth of the foundation below the natural and finish grade shall not be less than 24 inches for exterior and 18 inches for interior foundations. 11. To eliminate safety hazards on existing pools and spas and in accordance to the Health and Safety Code, Section 115928(d), the applicant shall install anti -entrapment cover whenever a building permit is issued for all remodeling or modification at a single-family home. 8 Development Review No. 2007-35 The Planning Commission shall. (a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and (b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, to: Ms. Dong Hong, 2759 Steeplechase Lane, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 and Mr. David Y. Hu, 18071 Arenth Avenue, City of Industry, CA 91748. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND OF APRIL 2008, BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. BY: Steve Nelson, Chairman I, Nancy Fong, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of April 2008, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners: Nolan, Lee, Shah, VC/Torng, Chair/Nelson NOES: Commissioners: None ABSTAIN: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: None ATTEST: Nan y Fong, S crIta:T\P 9 Development Review No. 2007-35 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS USE PERMITS, COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL NEW AND REMODELED STRUCTURES PROJECT #: Development Review No. 2007-5 and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2008-08 SUBJECT: Convert an existing garage to 560 square feet of livable area and construct a four -car garage and tennis court in the rear yard PROPERTY OWNER: Ms. Doric] Hong APPLICANT: Mr. David Y. Hu LOCATION: 2759 Steeplechase Lane ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION AT (909) 839-7030, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements 1. In accordance with Government Code Section 66474.9(b) (1), the applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, and its officers, agents and employees, from any claim, action, or proceeding to attack, set-aside, void or annul, the approval of Development Review No. 2007-35 and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2008-05 brought within the time period provided by Government Code Section 66499.37. In the event the city and/or its officers, agents and employees are made a party of any such action: (a) Applicant shall provide a defense to the City defendants or at the City's option reimburse the City its costs of defense, including reasonable attorneys fees, incurred in defense of such claims. (b) Applicant shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against the City descendents. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action of proceeding, and shall cooperate fully in the defense thereof. 10 Development Review No. 2007-35 2. This approval shall not be effective for any purpose until the applicant and owner of the property involved have filed, within twenty-one (21) days of approval of this Development Review No. 2007-35 and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2008-05 at the City of Diamond Bar Community Development Departnnent, their affidavit stating that they are aware of and agree to accept all the conditions of this approval. Further, this approval shall not be effective until the applicants pay remaining City processing fees, school fees and fees for the review of submitted reports. 3. All designers, architects, engineers, and contractors associated with this project shall obtain a Diamond Bar Business License and zoning approval for those businesses located in Diamond Bar. 4. Signed copies of Planning Commission Resolution No. 2008-15 Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 5. Prior to plan check, revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval. 6. Prior to any us,e of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval shall be completed 7. The project site shall be maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of approval and all laws, or other applicable regulations. 8. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and any applicable Specific Plan in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 9. Site, grading, landscape/irrigation and driveway plans, elevations and sections shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of City permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.,) or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 10. The single family residence shall not be used in a manner that creates adverse effects upon the neighborhood and environmental setting of the residential site to levels of dust, glare/light, noise, odor, traffic, or other disturbances to the existing residential neighborhood and shall not result in significantly adverse effects on public services and resources. The single family residence shall not be used for commercial/institutional purposes, or otherwise used as a separate dwelling. The property shall not be used for regular gatherings which result in a nuisance or which create traffic and parking problems in the neighborhood. 11 Development Review No. 2007-35 11. Property owner/applicant shall remove the public hearing notice board within three days of this project's approval. 12. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of City Planning, Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works Department, and Fire Department. B. Fees/Deposits 1. Applicant shall pay development fees (including but not limited to Planning, Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works Department and Mitigation Monitoring) at the established rates, prior to issuance of building or grading permit (whichever comes first), as required by the City. School fees as required shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permit. In addition, the applicant shall pay all remaining prorated City project review and processing fees prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever come first. Prior to any plan check, all deposit accounts for the processing of this project shall have no deficits. C. Time Limits The approval of Development Review No. 2007-35 and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2008-05 shall expire within two years from the date of approval if the use has not been exercised as defined per Municipal Code Section 22.66.050 (b)(1). The applicant may request in writing a one year time extension subject to Municipal Code Section 22.60.050(c) for Planning Commission approval. D. Site Development 1. The project site shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the approved plans submitted to, approved, and amended herein by the Planning Commission, collectively labeled and referenced herein as Exhibit "A" dated April 22, 2008, including: site plan, floor plan, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors and landscaping/irrigation plan on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein and Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to the issuance of any permits, the Applicant shall complete and record a "Covenant and Agreement to Maintain a Single -Family Residence" on a form to be provided by the City. The covenant shall be completed and recorded with the Los Angeles County Recorders Office. E. Solid Waste 1. The site shall be maintained in a condition, which is free of debris both during and after the construction, addition, or implementation of the entitlement approved herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether 12 Development Review No. 2007-35