HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC 2007-17PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 2007-17
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA
PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
140.2007-01, MINOR VARIANCE NO. 2007-01, AND MINOR
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2007-06, A REQUEST FOR AN
ADDITION OF 1,512 SQUARE FEET TO AN EXISTING 2,036 SQUARE
FOOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE FEET ON AN EXISTING 12,291 LOT,
E=NCROACHMENT OF SIDE YARD SETBACK, AND THE CONTINUATION
OF LEGAL NONCONFORMING FRONT YARD SETBACK. THE PROJECT
SITE IS LOCATED AT 24449 NAN COURT (APN: 8701-049-035, LOT 35,
TRACT NO. 42573), DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA.
A. RECITALS
Property owners/applicants, Mr. Raymond and Mrs. Laura Wolfe, have filed
an application for Development Review No. 2007-01, Minor Variance
No. 200-01, and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-06, for property
located at 24449 Nan Court, Diamond Bar, Los Angeles County, California.
Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review shall be
referred to as the "Application."
2. Public hearing notices were mailed to approximately 47 property owners
within a 500 -foot radius of the project site. Notification of the public hearing
for this project was advertised in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and Inland
Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers. In addition, the project site was posted
with a display board and the public notice was posted in three public places.
3. On March 27, 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar
conducted and concluded a duly noticed public hearing on the Application.
B. RESOLUTION
NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows:
1. This Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct;
2. The Planning Commission hereby finds that the project identified above in
this Resolution is categorically exempt according to Section 15301 (e) of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and guidelines promulgated
thereunder. Furthermore, the categorical exemption reflects the independent
judgment of the City of Diamond Bar;
3. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds and determines that,
having considered the record as a whole including the findings set forth
below, and changes and alterations which have been incorporated into and
conditioned upon the proposed project set forth in the application, there is no
evidence before this Planning Commission that the project proposed herein
will have the potential of an adverse effect on wild life resources or the
habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Based upon substantial evidence,
this Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effects
contained in Section 753.5 (d) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations;
4. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein, this Planning
Commission hereby finds as follows:
(a) The project site is located at 24449 Nan Court (Lot 35 of
Tract 42573), Diamond Bar, California;
(b) The project site has a General Plan land use designation of Low
Density Residential (RL) Maximum 3 DU/AC;
(c) The project site is within the Single Family Residence -Minimum Lot
Size 10,000 Square Feet (RPD -20,000-2U) Zone interpreted as Low
Density Residential (RL) Zone;
(d) Generally, to the north is Single Family Residential -Minimum Lot Size
10,000 (RPD -20,000-2U) zone; to the east is Planning Area (A-2-1)
zone; to the south is Single Family Residential -Minimum Lot Size
10,000 square feet (RPD -20,000-2U) zone; and to the west is Single
Family Residential -Minimum Lot Size 10,000 (RPD -20,000-2U);
(e) The Application request for an addition of 1,512 square feet to
existing 2,036 square foot Single Family Residence feet on an
existing 12,291 square foot lot, encroachment of side yard setback,
continuation of legal nonconforming front yard setback, and the
continuation of legal nonconforming side setback between structures.
Development Review
(f) The design and layout of the proposed development is consistentwith
the applicable elements of the City's General Plan, City Design
Guidelines, and development standards of the applicable district,
design guidelines, and architectural criteria for special areas
(e.g., theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards or
planned developments);
2
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2007-17
On July 25, 1995, the City adopted its General Plan. Although Tract
No. 42573, Lot 35 (project site) was established prior to the City's
incorporation and General Plan's adoption. The application complies
with the City's General Plan's elements, objectives, and strategies
related to maintaining the integrity of residential neighborhoods and
open space, and the Low Density Residential (minimum lot of 10,000
Square Foot) land use designation.
The proposed project consists of an addition of 1,512 square feet to
an existing 2,036 square foot Single Family Residence. Hence, the
proposed project meets all other development standards for the RL
zoning district as prescribed in the Development Code.
The proposed project is not unusual for the surrounding area and is
consistent with other development within this community. The
proposed project will maintain the integrity and not degrade this
residential area. As a result, the proposed project complies with the
General Plan objectives and strategies and the City's Design
Guidelines related to maintaining the integrity of residential
neighborhoods and open space. Furthermore, the proposed projects
architectural style (Mediterranean) and construction materials and
colors will match the existing residence which is compatible with the
eclectic architectural style, colors and material of other homes within
the community.
(g) The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere
with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future
development and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards;
With the approval and construction of the proposed project, the
current use of the project site will be maintained. As referenced
above in finding (t), the proposed project can be accommodated at
the project site. Additionally, the architectural style, color and
materials proposed will match the existing residence.
The proposed addition of 1,512 square feet to an existing 2,036
square foot Single Family Residence established in the surrounding
community and also consistent with otheradditions recently approved
by the Planning Commission. As such, the proposed project is not
expected to interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring
existing or future development. The proposed project is not expected
to intensify the existing use to an extent that will create traffic or
pedestrian hazards.
3
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2007-17
(h) The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible
with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain
the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by
Chapter 22.48.20. Development Review Standards, City Design
Guidelines, the City's General Plan, or any applicable specific plan;
The architectural style of the proposed site is a typical Mediterranean
design. The compatibility of the proposed project with the surrounding
residences is consistent with the City's Development Review
Standards, City Design Guidelines and City's General Plan. As a
result, the proposed project will maintain the harmonious, orderly and
attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22.48.20.
Development Review Standards, City Design Guidelines, the City's
General Plan. There is not an applicable specific plan for this area.
(i) The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable
environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its
neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, and color
that will remain aesthetically appealing and will retain a reasonably
adequate level of maintenance;
As referenced in the above findings (t), (g), and (h), the proposed
project will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and
visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of
materials, texture and color that will remain aesthetically appealing
while offering variety in color and texture and a low level of
maintenance.
(j) The proposed development will not be detrimental to public health,
safety or welfare or materially injurious (e.g., negative affect on
property values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or
improvements in the vicinity;
Before the issuance of any City permits, the proposed project is
required to comply with all conditions within the approved resolution
and the Building and Safety Division, Public Works Division, and Fire
Department requirements. The referenced agencies through the
permit and inspection process will ensure that the proposed project is
not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially
injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity.
(k) The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA);
According to the provisions of the Califomia Environmental QualityAct
(CEQA), Section 15301(e), the City has determined that the project
4
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2007-17
identified above in this Resolution is categorically exempt.
Furthermore, the categorical exemption reflects the independent
judgment of the City of Diamond Bar.
Minor Variance
(1) There are special circumstances applicable to the property
(e.g., location, shape, size, surroundings, topography, or other
conditions), so that the strict application of this Development Code
denies the property owner privileges enjoyed by other property
owners in the vicinity and under identical zoning districts or creates an
unnecessary and non -self-created, hardship or unreasonable
regulation which make it obviously impractical to require compliance
with the development standards.
The single-family residence's original construction was approved
using the Los Angeles County Code and met the required setbacks of
that code. In December 1998, the Diamond Bar Development Code
was adopted, and in April 2000 Ordinance 02 (2000), amending the
Code's lot development standard, was approved by the City Council.
The side yard setback criterion for all single-family residences is now
5 feet on one side and 10 feet in the other. The request is to
decrease the side yard setback to 7 feet 6 inches from the permitted
10 foot setback.
The subject property is zoned RPD 20,000-2U. It is a 12,291 square
foot irregularly shaped lot. The subject property is an average sized
lot surrounding Nan Court that range in size from an average of 8,000
to 21,000 square feet..
The applicant is proposing to add 1,512 square feet, two-story
addition with a wrap around porch that will encroach into the east side
yard setback. The livable structure without the wrap around porch will
have a 13 foot setback, which is more than the required side setback.
Therefore, it creates a hardship that makes it impractical to require
compliance with the development standards.
(m) Granting the Minor Variance is necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other property
owners in the same vicinity and zoning district and denied to the
property owner for which the Minor Variance is sought.
The homes in the area were built prior to the adoption the City's
Development Code and amendments. The side yard setback criterion
for all single-family residences under the Low Density Residential
5
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2007-17
zone is 5 feet on one side and 10 feet on the other. The applicant is
requesting to encroach into the setback 2 feet 6 inches.
Other homes in this tract have legal nonconforming side yard
setbacks. Therefore, granting the Minor Variance is necessary for the
preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed
by other property owners in the same vicinity and zoning district and
denied to the property owner for which the Minor Variance is sought.
(n) Granting the Minor Variance is consistent with the General Plan and
any applicable specific plan.
The proposed single-family residence is consistent the City's General
Plan and there is no specific plan for the area. The proposed single-
family residence complies with the applicable standards for the RPD
20,000-2U (Low Density Residential Development Standards (RL))
zoning district with the exception of the side yard setback. In this
case, the encroachment of a side yard setback requires a Minor
Variance approval. The side yard setback encroachment is in the
east side of the lot, which is consistent with the neighboring properties
with respect to design and materials.
(o) The proposed entitlement would not be detrimental to the public
interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City.
As stated in Item 4(0 — (j), the proposed entitlement would not be
detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or
welfare of the City.
(p) The proposed entitlement has been reviewed in compliance with the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
As stated in Item 4(k), the proposed entitlement has been reviewed in
compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA).
Minor Conditional Use Permit
(q) The proposed use is allowed within the subject zoning district with the
applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Municipal
Code;
As stated in Findings (1), (g) and (h) above, the proposed addition to
an existing single-family residence is allowed within the RPD-20,000-
2U/RL zoning district. According to the Development Code, the
development standards of the RL zoning district apply to the project
6
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2007-17
site. RPD -20,000 zoning district and complies with all applicable
Development Code standards for that zoning district except for the
legal nonconforming front yard setbacks and the side yard setback
between structures. The existing legal nonconforming setbacks can
be allowed with the appropriate findings through the Minor Conditional
Use Permit process.
According to Development Code Section 22.68.030 (a) and (b) —
Restrictions on Nonconforming Structures, a structure shall be
deemed nonconforming if the structure fails to conform to the building
envelope regulations (e.g., lot coverage, height, or setback
requirements) as specified for each zoning district. In addition, this
Code section specifies that an addition, enlargement, extension,
reconstruction, relocation, or structural alteration of a legal non-
conforming structure may be allowed with approval of a Minor
Conditional Use Permit with findings specified in Code
Section 22.56.040. Findings specified in Section 22.68.030 for legal
nonconforming structures must also be made. Furthermore,
Section 22.68.030 requires that the exterior limits of new construction
do not exceed the applicable height limit or encroach further into the
setbacks than the comparable portion of the existing structure (follow
the development line of the existing structure); however, if the existing
front yard setback is less than 20 feet, the exterior limits of new
construction shall maintain a minimum 20 foot front yard setback.
According to Table 2-4 of Development Code Section 22.08.040, the
required front yard setbacks for the RL zoning district 20 feet and the
side yard setback is 5 feet with a 15 foot separation between
residential structures on adjoining properties. The existing residence
at the project site has a front yard setback of 17 feet 5 inches. The
existing residence at the project site has side yard setbacks of five
feet with 13 foot 9 inches separation between residential structures on
adjoining properties. The front and side yard setbacks which were
legal under Los Angeles County's jurisdiction when the residence was
constructed are now considered legal nonconforming. Additionally,
Los Angeles County did not have a required separation between
residential structures on adjoining properties. The proposed addition
will maintain the existing front and side yard setbacks and existing
separation between residential structures on adjoining properties. It
will also follow the development line of the existing residence and will
not exceed the maximum height or lot coverage allowed in the RL
zoning district.
Staff believes that approving the Minor Conditional Use Permit as
described above for the proposed addition is appropriate and
compatible with other residences in the neighborhood because:
7
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2007-17
(1) The project site is an irregular shaped lot. The closest setback
will be where the garages are located. Even with the addition,
the adjacent resident will maintain twelve foot setback where
the habitable space begins.
(2) The proposed addition will maintain the existing legal
nonconforming 13 feet 9 inches side yard setback between
structures and the 17 foot 5 inch front yard setback.
(3) With the proposed addition and legal non -conforming front
yard setback and legal non -conforming separation between
residences will be maintained.
(4) By maintaining the existing setbacks and separation between
residential structures on adjoining lots, the proposed project is
consistent with other homes within the neighborhood located
on the curve area of Nan Court. Additionally, the proposed
project will add value to and visually enhance the existing
residence and neighborhood.
(r) The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any
applicable specific plan;
As stated in Item 4(0, the proposed use is consistent with the General
Plan and any applicable specific plan.
(s) The design, location, size and operating characteristics of the
proposed use are compatible with the existing and future land uses in
the vicinity;
As stated in Findings (t), (g, (h), (i) and (1) above, the design, location,
size and operating characteristics of the proposed addition are
compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity,
(t) The subject site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity
of use being proposed including access, provision of utilities,
compatibility with adjoining land uses, and the absence of physical
constraints;
As stated in Findings (t), (g), (h), (i) and (1) above, the project site is
physically suitable for the type and densitylin tensity of proposed
addition including access, provision of utilities, compatibility with
adjoining land uses, and the absence of physical constraints;
8
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2007-17
(u) Granting the Minor Conditional Use Permit will not be detrimental to
the public interest, health, safety, injurious to persons, property, or
improvements in the vicinity and zoning district in which the property is
located; and
As stated in Item 4(0-6), granting the Minor Conditional Use Permit
will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety,
convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to person, property or
improvements in the vicinity and zoning districts in which the property
is located.
(v) The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
According to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA), Section 15301(e), the City has determined that the project
identified above in this Resolution is categorically exempt.
Furthermore, the categorical exemption reflects the independent
judgment of the City of Diamond Bar.
5. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth above, the Planning
Commission hereby approves the Application subject to the following
conditions and the attached standard conditions:
Planning Division
(a) The project shall substantially conform to site plan, floor plans, roof
plan, elevations, demolition plan, and sections collectively labeled as
Exhibit "A" dated March 27, 2007, as submitted and approved by the
Planning Commission, and as amended herein;
(b) Before construction begins, the applicant shall install temporary
construction fencing with screening along the project site's perimeter.
This fencing shall remain until the Building Official approves its
removal. The Applicant shall provide temporary sanitation facilities
while under construction;
(c) Applicant shall comply with Planning Division, Building and Safety
Division and Public Works Division requirements;
(d) The owner shall complete and record a "Covenant and Agreement to
Maintain a Single Family Residence" on a form to be provided by the
City. The covenant must be completed and recorded with the Los
Angeles County's Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of a building
permit;
9
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2007-17
PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION
(e) The Drainage Plan shall be prepared by a Civil Engineer, licensed in
the State of California, in accordance with the City's requirements for
plan check review and approval by the Public Works Division. The
Drainage Plan shall show the location of the walls and elevations of
the top of wall/footing and finished grade on both sides of the
retaining walls. Additionally, surface water shall drain away from the
building at a 2% minimum slope;
(f) If applicable, all drainage/runoff from the development shall be
conveyed from the site to the natural drainage course or the adjacent
private street, with the exception of the drainage to the adjacent
private street, no on-site drainage shall be conveyed to adjacent
parcels. If required by the Public Works Director, the applicant shall
provide a hydrology study;
(g) Before the issuance of any City permits, erosion control plans shall be
submitted for the City's review and approval. Measures shall be in
place for construction started after October 1, through April 15. The
erosion control plan shall conform to National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) standards and incorporate the
appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP's). Additionally, the
applicant shall obtain the necessary NPDES permits;
BUILDING AND SAFETY
(h) Applicant shall submit drawings and calculations prepared by a
licensed architect or engineer with wet stamp and signature;
(i) Prior to the issuance of any construction permits, the applicant shall
submit construction plans to the Los Angeles County Fire Department
for review and approval;
(j) Prior to the issuance of any City permits retaining wall calculations
shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for review and
approval;
The Planning Commission shall.
(a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and
(b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail,
to: Mr. Raymond and Mrs. Laura Wolfe, 24449 Nan Court, Diamond
Bar, CA 91765.
10
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2007-17
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27th OF MARCH 2007, BY THE
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR.
'Steve Nelson , Chairman
I, Nancy Fong, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Diamond Bar, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th
day of March 2007, by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Wei, Lee, Nolan, VC/Torng, Chair/Nelson
NOES: Commissioners: None
ABSTAIN: Commissioners: None
ABSENT: Commissioners: None
ATTEST:
ancy Fon Secretary/
11
DR 2007-01
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
USE PERMITS, COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL
NEW AND REMODELED STRUCTURES
PROJECT #: Development Review No. 2007-01, Minor Variance No.
2007-01, and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-06
SUBJECT: Addition of 1,512 Square Feet to an existing 2,036
Square Foot Single Family Residence, encroachment
of side yard setback, and continuation of legal non-
conforming front yard setback.
APPLICANT: Mr. Raymond and Mrs. Laura Wolfe
LOCATION: 24449 Nan Court, Diamond Bar, CA 91765
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION AT
(909) 339-7030, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
A. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
In accordance with Government Code Section 66474.9(b) (1), the applicant
shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, and its officers, agents
and employees, from any claim, action, or proceeding to attack, set-aside,
void or annul, the approval of Development Review No. 2007-01, Minor
Variance No. 2007-01, and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-06
brought within the time period provided by Government Code
12
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2007-17
Section 66499.37. In the event the city and/or its officers, agents and
employees are made a party of any such action:
(a) Applicant shall provide a defense to the City defendants or at the
City's option reimburse the City its costs of defense, including
reasonable attorneys fees, incurred in defense of such claims.
(b) Applicant shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against the
City descendents.
The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action of
proceeding, and shall cooperate fully in the defense thereof.
2. This approval shall not be effective for any purpose until the applicant and
owner of the property involved have filed, within twenty-one (21) days of
approval of this Development Review No. 2007-01, Minor Variance
No. 2007-01, and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-06, at the City of
Diamond Bar Community and Development Services Department, their
affidavit stating that they are aware of and agree to accept all the conditions
of this approval. Further, this approval shall not be effective until the
applicants pay remaining City processing fees, school fees and fees for the
review of submitted reports.
3. All designers, architects, engineers, and contractors associated with this
project shall obtain a Diamond Bar Business Registration and zoning
approval for those businesses located in Diamond Bar.
4. Signed copies of the Planning Commission Resolution No. 2007-17,
Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on
the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties
involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet
sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect.
5. Prior to the plan check, revised site plans and building elevations
incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning
Division review and approval.
6. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced
thereon, all conditions of approval shall be completed.
7. The project site shall be maintained and operated in full compliance with the
conditions of approval and all laws, or other applicable regulations.
8. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the
Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and any applicable
Specific Plan in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
13
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2007-17
9. All site plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of City
permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.,) or
approved use has commenced, whichever comes first.
10. The single family residence shall not be used in a manner that creates
adverse effects upon the neighborhood and environmental setting of the
residential site to levels of dust, glare/light, noise, odor, traffic, or other
disturbances to the existing residential neighborhood and shall not result in
significantly adverse effects on public services and resources. The single
family residence shall not be used for commercial/institutional purposes, or
otherwise used as a separate dwelling. The property shall not be used for
regular gatherings which result in a nuisance or which create traffic and
parking problems in the neighborhood.
11. Property owner/applicant shall remove the public hearing notice board within
three days of this project's approval.
12. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of City Planning, Building
and Safety Divisions, Public Works Department, and the Fire Department.
B. FEES/DEPOSITS
Applicant shall pay development fees (including but not limited to Planning,
Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works Department and Mitigation
Monitoring) at the established rates, prior to issuance of building or grading
permit (whichever come first), as required by the City. School fees as
required shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permit. In addition, the
applicant shall pay all remaining prorated City project review and processing
fees prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever come first.
2. Prior to any plan check, all deposit accounts for the processing of this project
shall have no deficits.
C. TIME LIMITS
The approval of Development Review No. 2007-01, Minor Variance
No. 2007-01, and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-06 shall expire
within two years from the date of approval if the use has not been exercised
as defined per Municipal Code Section 22.66.050 (b)(1). The applicant may
request in writing a one year time extension subject to Municipal Code
Section 22.60.050(c) for Planning Commission approval.
14
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2007-17
D. SITE DEVELOPMENT
1. The project - site shall be developed and maintained in substantial
conformance with the approved plans submitted to, approved, and amended
herein by the Planning Commission, collectively labeled and referenced
herein as Exhibit "A" including: site plans, floor plans, architectural
elevations, exterior materials and colors on file in the Planning Division, the
conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, the Specific
Plan, and the Community Plan.
2. Prior to the issuance of any permits, the Applicant shall complete and record
a "Covenant and Agreement to Maintain a Single -Family Residence on a
form to be provided by the City. The covenant shall be completed and
recorded with the Los Angeles County Recorders Office.
F. SOLID WASTE
The site shall be maintained in a condition, which is free of debris both during
and after the construction, addition, or implementation of the entitlement
approved herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether
during or subsequent to construction shall be done only by the property
owner, applicant or by a duly permitted waste contractor, who has been
authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal of
solid waste from residential, commercial, construction, and industrial areas
within the City. It shall be the applicant's obligation to insure that the waste
contractor used has obtained permits from the City of Diamond Bar to
provide such services.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT,
(909) 839-7040, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
A. GENERAL
An Erosion Control Plan shall be submitted clearly detailing erosion control
measures. These measures shall be implemented during construction
between October 1St and April 15th. The erosion control plan shall conform
to national Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards and
incorporate the appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP's.)
2. Grading and construction activities and the transportation of equipment and
materials and operation of heavy grading equipment shall be limited to
between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday.
Dust generated by grading and construction activities shall be reduced by
watering the soil prior to and during the activities and in accordance with
South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 402 and Rule 403.
15
Planning Commission Resolut+on No. 2007-17
Reclaimed water shall be used whenever possible. Additionally, all
construction equipment shall be properly muffled to reduce noise levels.
B. DRAINAGE
Detailed drainage system information of the lot with careful attention to any
flood hazard area shall be submitted. All drainage/runoff from the
development shall be conveyed from the site to the natural drainage course.
No on-site drainage shall be conveyed to adjacent parcels, unless that is the
natural drainage course.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION,
(909) 939-7020, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
Plans shall conform to State and Local Building Code (i.e., 2001 California
Building Code, California Plumbing Code, California Mechanical Code, and
the 2001 National Electrical Code) requirements and all other applicable
construction codes, ordinances and regulations in effect at the time of plan
check submittal.
2. The minimum design load for wind in this area is 80 M.P.H. exposures "C"
and the site is within seismic zone four (4). The applicant shall submit
drawings and calculations prepared by a California State licensed
Architect/Engineer with wet stamp and signature.
3. This project shall comply with the energy conservation requirements of the
State of California Energy Commission. Kitchen and bathroom lights shall be
fluorescent.
4. Verify adequate exit requirements. The distance between required exits shall
be Y2 of the building diagonal.
5. Building setback from any slope (toe or top) shall meet Chapter 18 of the
2001 California Building Code.
6. Fire Department approval may be required. Contact the Fire Department to
check the fire zone for the location of your property. If this project is located
in High Hazard Fire Zone it shall meet of requirements of the fire zone.
a. All unenclosed under -floor areas shall be constructed as exteriorwall.
b. All openings into the attic, floor and/or other enclosed areas shall be
covered with corrosion -resistant wire mesh not less than 1/4 inch or
more than 1/2 inch in any dimension except where such openings are
equipped with sash or door.
16
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2007-17
7. The project shall be protected by a construction fence and shall comply with
the NPDES & BMP requirements (sand bags, etc.).
8. Check drainage patterns with Engineering Department. Surface water shall
drain away from building at a 2% minimum slope.
9. Specify location of tempered glass as required by code.
10. Specify 1/4"/ft slope for all flat surfaces/ decks with approved water proofing
material. Also, provide guardrail connection detail (height, spacing, etc.)
END
17
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2007-17
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 2007-17
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA
PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
NO.2007-01, MINOR VARIANCE NO. 2007-01, AND MINOR
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2007-06, A REQUEST FOR AN
ADDITION OF 1,512 SQUARE FEET TO AN EXISTING 2,036 SQUARE
FOOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE FEET ON AN EXISTING 12,291 LOT,
ENCROACHMENT OF SIDE YARD SETBACK, AND THE CONTINUATION
OF LEGAL NONCONFORMING FRONT YARD SETBACK. THE PROJECT
SITE IS LOCATED AT 24449 NAN COURT (APN: 8701-049-035, LOT 35,
TRACT NO. 42573), DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA.
A. RECITALS
11. Property owners/applicants, Mr. Raymond and Mrs. Laura Wolfe, have filed
an application for Development Review No. 2007-01, Minor Variance
No. 200-01, and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-06, for property
located at 24449 Nan Court, Diamond Bar, Los Angeles County, California.
Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review shall be
referred to as the "Application."
2. Public hearing notices were mailed to approximately 47 property owners
within a 500 -foot radius of the project site. Notification of the public hearing
for this project was advertised in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and Inland
Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers. In addition, the project site was posted
with a display board and the public notice was posted in three public places.
3. On March 27, 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar
conducted and concluded a duly noticed public hearing on the Application.
B. RESOLUTION
NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows:
1. This Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct;
2. The Planning Commission hereby finds that the project identified above in
this Resolution is categorically exempt according to Section 15301 (e) of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and guidelines promulgated
thereunder. Furthermore, the categorical exemption reflects the independent
judgment of the City of Diamond Bar;
3. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds and determines that,
having considered the record as a whole including the findings set forth
below, and changes and alterations which have been incorporated into and
conditioned upon the proposed project set forth in the application, there is no
evidence before this Planning Commission that the project proposed herein
will have the potential of an adverse effect on wild life resources or the
habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Based upon substantial evidence,
this Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effects
contained in Section 753.5 (d) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations;
4. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein, this Planning
Commission hereby finds as follows:
(a) The project site is located at 24449 Nan Court (Lot 35 of
Tract 42573), Diamond Bar, California;
(b) The project site has a General Plan land use designation of Low
Density Residential (RL) Maximum 3 DU/AC;
(c) The project site is within the Single Family Residence -Minimum Lot
Size 10,000 Square Feet (RPD -20,000-2U) Zone interpreted as Low
Density Residential (RL) Zone;
(d) Generally, to the north is Single Family Residential -Minimum Lot Size
10,000 (RPD -20,000-2U) zone; to the east is Planning Area (A-2-1)
zone; to the south is Single Family Residential -Minimum Lot Size
10,000 square feet (RPD -20,000-2U) zone; and to the west is Single
Family Residential -Minimum Lot Size 10,000 (RPD -20,000-2U);
(e) The Application request for an addition of 1,512 square feet to
existing 2,036 square foot Single Family Residence feet on an
existing 12,291 square foot lot, encroachment of side yard setback,
continuation of legal nonconforming front yard setback, and the
continuation of legal nonconforming side setback between structures.
Development Review
(f)
The design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with
the applicable elements of the City's General Plan, City Design
Guidelines, and development standards of the applicable district,
design guidelines, and architectural criteria for special areas
(e.g., theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards or
planned developments);
2
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2007-17
On July 25, 1995, the City adopted its General Plan. Although Tract
No. 42573, Lot 35 (project site) was established prior to the City's
incorporation and General Plan's adoption. The application complies
with the City's General Plan's elements, objectives, and strategies
related to maintaining the integrity of residential neighborhoods and
open space, and the Low Density Residential (minimum lot of 10, 000
Square Foot) land use designation.
The proposed project consists of an addition of 1,512 square feet to
an existing 2,036 square foot Single Family Residence. Hence, the
proposed project meets all other development standards for the RL
zoning district as prescribed in the Development Code.
The proposed project is not unusual for the surrounding area and is
consistent with other development within this community. The
proposed project will maintain the integrity and not degrade this
residential area. As a result, the proposed project complies with the
General Plan objectives and strategies and the City's Design
Guidelines related to maintaining the integrity of residential
neighborhoods and open space. Furthermore, the proposed projects
architectural style (Mediterranean) and construction materials and
colors will match the existing residence which is compatible with the
eclectic architectural style, colors and material of other homes within
the community.
(g) The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere
with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future
development and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards;
With the approval and construction of the proposed project, the
current use of the project site will be maintained. As referenced
above in finding (t), the proposed project can be accommodated at
the project site. Additionally, the architectural style, color and
materials proposed will match the existing residence.
The proposed addition of 1,512 square feet to an existing 2,036
square foot Single Family Residence established in the surrounding
community and also consistent with otheradditions recently approved
by the Planning Commission. As such, the proposed project is not
expected to interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring
existing or future development. The proposed project is not expected
to intensify the existing use to an extent that will create traffic or
pedestrian hazards.
3
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2007-17
(h) The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible
with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain
the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by
Chapter 22.48.20. Development Review Standards, City Design
Guidelines, the City's General Plan, or any applicable specific plan;
U)
The architectural style of the proposed site is a typical Mediterranean
design. The compatibility of the proposed project with the surrounding
residences is consistent with the City's Development Review
Standards, City Design Guidelines and City's General Plan. As a
result, the proposed project will maintain the harmonious, orderly and
attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22.48.20.
Development Review Standards, City Design Guidelines, the City's
General Plan. There is not an applicable specific plan for this area.
The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable
environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its
neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, and color
that will remain aesthetically appealing and will retain a reasonably
adequate level of maintenance;
As referenced in the above findings (t), (g), and (h), the proposed
project will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and
visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of
materials, texture and color that will remain aesthetically appealing
while offering variety in color and texture and a low level of
maintenance.
The proposed development will not be detrimental to public health,
safety or welfare or materially injurious (e.g., negative affect on
property values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or
improvements in the vicinity;
Before the issuance of any City permits, the proposed project is
required to comply with all conditions within the approved resolution
and the Building and Safety Division, Public Works Division, and Fire
Department requirements. The referenced agencies through the
permit and inspection process will ensure that the proposed project is
not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially
injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity.
(k) The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA);
According to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA), Section 15301(e), the City has determined that the project
4
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2007-17
identified above in this Resolution is categorically exempt.
Furthermore, the categorical exemption reflects the independent
judgment of the City of Diamond Bar.
Minor Variance
(I)
(m)
There are special circumstances applicable to the property
(e.g., location, shape, size, surroundings, topography, or other
conditions), so that the strict application of this Development Code
denies the property owner privileges enjoyed by other property
owners in the vicinity and under identical zoning districts or creates an
unnecessary and non -self-created, hardship or unreasonable
regulation which make it obviously impractical to require compliance
with the development standards.
The single-family residence's original construction was approved
using the Los Angeles County Code and met the required setbacks of
that code. In December 1998, the Diamond Bar Development Code
was adopted, and in April 2000 Ordinance 02 (2000), amending the
Code's lot development standard, was approved by the City Council.
The side yard setback criterion for all single-family residences is now
5 feet on one side and 10 feet in the other. The request is to
decrease the side yard setback to 7 feet 6 inches from the permitted
10 foot setback.
The subject property is zoned RPD 20,000-2U. It is a 12,291 square
foot irregularly shaped lot. The subject property is an average sized
lot surrounding Nan Court that range in size from an average of 8,000
to 21,000 square feet..
The applicant is proposing to add 1,512 square feet, two-story
addition with a wrap around porch that will encroach into the east side
yard setback. The livable structure without the wrap around porch will
have a 13 foot setback, which is more than the required side setback.
Therefore, it creates a hardship that makes it impractical to require
compliance with the development standards.
Granting the Minor Variance is necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other property
owners in the same vicinity and zoning district and denied to the
property owner for which the Minor Variance is sought.
The homes in the area were built prior to the adoption the City's
Development Code and amendments. The side yard setback criterion
for all single-family residences under the Low Density Residential
5
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2007-17
zone is 5 feet on one side and 10 feet on the other. The applicant is
requesting to encroach into the setback 2 feet 6 inches.
Other homes in this tract have legal nonconforming side yard
setbacks. Therefore, granting the Minor Variance is necessary for the
preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed
by other property owners in the same vicinity and zoning district and
denied to the property owner for which the Minor Variance is sought.
(n) Granting the Minor Variance is consistent with the General Plan and
any applicable specific plan.
The proposed single-family residence is consistent the City's General
Plan and there is no specific plan for the area. The proposed single-
family residence complies with the applicable standards for the RPD
20,000-2U (Low Density Residential Development Standards (RL))
zoning district with the exception of the side yard setback. In this
case, the encroachment of a side yard setback requires a Minor
Variance approval. The side yard setback encroachment is in the
east side of the lot, which is consistent with the neighboring properties
with respect to design and materials.
(o) The proposed entitlement would not be detrimental to the public
interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City.
(p)
As stated in item 4(f) - (j), the proposed entitlement would not be
detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or
welfare of the City.
The proposed entitlement has been reviewed in compliance with the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
As stated in Item 4(k), the proposed entitlement has been reviewed in
compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA).
Minor Conditional Use Permit
(q)
The proposed use is allowed within the subject zoning district with the
applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Municipal
Code;
As stated in Findings (t), (g) and (h) above, the proposed addition to
an existing single-family residence is allowed within the RPD -20, 000-
2U/RL zoning district. According to the Development Code, the
development standards of the RL zoning district apply to the project
6
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2007-17
site. RPD -20,000 zoning district and complies with all applicable
Development Code standards for that zoning district except for the
legal nonconforming front yard setbacks and the side yard setback
between structures. The existing legal nonconforming setbacks can
be allowed with the appropriate findings through the Minor Conditional
Use Permit process.
According to Development Code Section 22.68.030 (a) and (b) -
Restrictions on Nonconforming Structures, a structure shall be
deemed nonconforming if the structure fails to conform to the building
envelope regulations (e.g., lot coverage, height, or setback
requirements) as specified for each zoning district. In addition, this
Code section specifies that an addition, enlargement, extension,
reconstruction, relocation, or structural alteration of a legal non-
conforming structure may be allowed with approval of a Minor
Conditional Use Permit with findings specified in Code
Section 22.56.040. Findings specified in Section 22.68.030 for legal
nonconforming structures must also be made. Furthermore,
Section 22.68.030 requires that the exterior limits of new construction
do not exceed the applicable height limit or encroach further into the
setbacks than the comparable portion of the existing structure (follow
the development line of the existing structure); however, if the existing
front yard setback is less than 20 feet, the exterior limits of new
construction shall maintain a minimum 20 foot front yard setback.
According to Table 2-4 of Development Code Section 22.08.040, the
required front yard setbacks for the RL zoning district 20 feet and the
side yard setback is 5 feet with a 15 foot separation between
residential structures on adjoining properties. The existing residence
at the project site has a front yard setback of 17 feet 5 inches. The
existing residence at the project site has side yard setbacks of five
feet with 13 foot 9 inches separation between residential structures on
adjoining properties. The front and side yard setbacks which were
legal under Los Angeles County's jurisdiction when the residence was
constructed are now considered legal nonconforming. Additionally,
Los Angeles County did not have a required separation between
residential structures on adjoining properties. The proposed addition
will maintain the existing front and side yard setbacks and existing
separation between residential structures on adjoining properties. It
will also follow the development line of the existing residence and will
not exceed the maximum height or lot coverage allowed in the RL
zoning district.
Staff believes that approving the Minor Conditional Use Permit as
described above for the proposed addition is appropriate and
compatible with other residences in the neighborhood because:
7
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2007-17
(1)
The project site is an irregular shaped lot. The closest setback
will be where the garages are located. Even with the addition,
the adjacent resident will maintain twelve foot setback where
the habitable space begins.
(2) The proposed addition will maintain the existing legal
nonconforming 13 feet 9 inches side yard setback between
structures and the 17 foot 5 inch front yard setback.
(3)
With the proposed addition and legal non -conforming front
yard setback and legal non -conforming separation between
residences will be maintained.
(4) By maintaining the existing setbacks and separation between
residential structures on adjoining lots, the proposed project is
consistent with other homes within the neighborhood located
on the curve area of Nan Court. Additionally, the proposed
project will add value to and visually enhance the existing
residence and neighborhood.
(r) The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any
applicable specific plan;
As stated in Item 4(f), the proposed use is consistent with the General
Plan and any applicable specific plan.
(s) The design, location, size and operating characteristics of the
proposed use are compatible with the existing and future land uses in
the vicinity;
As stated in Findings (t), (g, (h), (I) and (1) above, the design, location,
size and operating characteristics of the proposed addition are
compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity;
(t) The subject site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity
of use being proposed including access, provision of utilities,
compatibility with adjoining land uses, and the absence of physical
constraints;
As stated in Findings (f), (g), (h), (i) and (1) above, the project site is
physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of proposed
addition including access, provision of utilities, compatibility with
adjoining land uses, and the absence of physical constraints;
8
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2007-17
(u) Granting the Minor Conditional Use Permit will not be detrimental to
the public interest, health, safety, injurious to persons, property, or
improvements in the vicinity and zoning district in which the property is
located; and
As stated in Item 4(0-C), granting the Minor Conditional Use Permit
will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety,
convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to person, property or
improvements in the vicinity and zoning districts in which the property
is located.
(v) The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
According to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA), Section 15301(e), the City has determined that the project
identified above in this Resolution is categorically exempt.
Furthermore, the categorical exemption reflects the independent
judgment of the City of Diamond Bar.
55.
Based on the findings and conclusions set forth above, the Planning
Commission hereby approves the Application subject to the following
conditions and the attached standard conditions:
Planning Division
(a) The project shall substantially conform to site plan, floor plans, roof
plan, elevations, demolition plan, and sections collectively labeled as
Exhibit "A" dated March 27, 2007, as submitted and approved by the
Planning Commission, and as amended herein;
(b) Before construction begins, the applicant shall install temporary
construction fencing with screening along the project site's perimeter.
This fencing shall remain until the Building Official approves its
removal. The Applicant shall provide temporary sanitation facilities
while under construction;
(c) Applicant shall comply with Planning Division, Building and Safety
Division and Public Works Division requirements;
(d) The owner shall complete and record a "Covenant and Agreement to
Maintain a Single Family Residence" on a form to be provided by the
City. The covenant must be completed and recorded with the Los
Angeles County's Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of a building
permit;
9
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2007-17
PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION
(e) The Drainage Plan shall be prepared by a Civil Engineer, licensed in
the State of California, in accordance with the City's requirements for
plan check review and approval by the Public Works Division. The
Drainage Plan shall show the location of the walls and elevations of
the top of wall/footing and finished grade on both sides of the
retaining walls. Additionally, surface water shall drain away from the
building at a 2% minimum slope;
(f)
(9)
If applicable, all drainage/runoff from the development shall be
conveyed from the site to the natural drainage course or the adjacent
private street, with the exception of the drainage to the adjacent
private street, no on-site drainage shall be conveyed to adjacent
parcels. If required by the Public Works Director, the applicant shall
provide a hydrology study;
Before the issuance of any City permits, erosion control plans shall be
submitted for the City's review and approval. Measures shall be in
place for construction started after October 1, through April 15. The
erosion control plan shall conform to National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) standards and incorporate the
appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP's). Additionally, the
applicant shall obtain the necessary NPDES permits;
BUILDING AND SAFETY
(h) Applicant shall submit drawings and calculations prepared by a
licensed architect or engineer with wet stamp and signature;
(i)
U)
Prior to the issuance of any construction permits, the applicant shall
submit construction plans to the Los Angeles County Fire Department
for review and approval;
Prior to the issuance of any City permits retaining wall calculations
shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for review and
approval;
The Planning Commission shall.
(a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and
(b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail,
to: Mr. Raymond and Mrs. Laura Wolfe, 24449 Nan Court, Diamond
Bar, CA 91765.
10
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2007-17
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27th OF MARCH 2007, BY THE
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR.
BY:
I'll
--'Steve Nelson , Chairman
I, Nancy Fong, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Diamond Bar, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th
day of March 2007, by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Wei, Lee, Nolan, VC/Torng, Chair/Nelson
NOES: Commissioners: None
ABSTAIN: Commissioners: None
ABSENT: Commissioners: None
ATTEST:
11
DR 2007-01
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
USE PERMITS, COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL
NEW AND REMODELED STRUCTURES
PROJECT #: Development Review No. 2007-01, Minor Variance No.
2007-01, and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-06
SUBJECT: Addition of 1,512 Square Feet to an existing 2,036
Square Foot Single Family Residence, encroachment
of side yard setback, and continuation of legal non-
conforming front yard setback.
APPLICANT: Mr. Raymond and Mrs. Laura Wolfe
LOCATION: 24449 Nan Court, Diamond Bar, CA 91765
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION AT
(909) 839-7030, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
A. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
1 In accordance with Government Code Section 66474.9(b) (1), the applicant
shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, and its officers, agents
and employees, from any claim, action, or proceeding to attack, set-aside,
void or annul, the approval of Development Review No. 2007-01, Minor
Variance No. 2007-01, and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-06
brought within the time period provided by Government Code
12
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2007-17
Section 66499.37. In the event the city and/or its officers, agents and
employees are made a party of any such action:
(a) Applicant shall provide a defense to the City defendants or at the
City's option reimburse the City its costs of defense, including
reasonable attorneys fees, incurred in defense of such claims.
(b) Applicant shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against the
City descendents.
The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action of
proceeding, and shall cooperate fully in the defense thereof.
2. This approval shall not be effective for any purpose until the applicant and
owner of the property involved have filed, within twenty-one (21) days of
approval of this Development Review No. 2007-01, Minor Variance
No. 2007-01, and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-06, at the City of
Diamond Bar Community and Development Services Department, their
affidavit stating that they are aware of and agree to accept all the conditions
of this approval. Further, this approval shall not be effective until the
applicants pay remaining City processing fees, school fees and fees for the
review of submitted reports.
3. All designers, architects, engineers, and contractors associated with this
project shall obtain a Diamond Bar Business Registration and zoning
approval for those businesses located in Diamond Bar.
4. Signed copies of the Planning Commission Resolution No. 2007-17,
Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on
the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties
involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet
sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect.
5. Prior to the plan check, revised site plans and building elevations
incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning
Division review and approval.
6. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced
thereon, all conditions of approval shall be completed.
7. The project site shall be maintained and operated in full compliance with the
conditions of approval and all laws, or other applicable regulations.
8. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the
Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and any applicable
Specific Plan in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
13
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2007-17
9. All site plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of City
permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.,) or
approved use has commenced, whichever comes first.
'10. The single family residence shall not be used in a manner that creates
adverse effects upon the neighborhood and environmental setting of the
residential site to levels of dust, glare/light, noise, odor, traffic, or other
disturbances to the existing residential neighborhood and shall not result in
significantly adverse effects on public services and resources. The single
family residence shall not be used for commercial/institutional purposes, or
otherwise used as a separate dwelling. The property shall not be used for
regular gatherings which result in a nuisance or which create traffic and
parking problems in the neighborhood.
11. Property owner/applicant shall remove the public hearing notice board within
three days of this project's approval.
12. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of City Planning, Building
and Safety Divisions, Public Works Department, and the Fire Department.
B. FEES/DEPOSITS
Applicant shall pay development fees (including but not limited to Planning,
Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works Department and Mitigation
Monitoring) at the established rates, prior to issuance of building or grading
permit (whichever come first), as required by the City. School fees as
required shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permit. In addition, the
applicant shall pay all remaining prorated City project review and processing
fees prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever come first.
2. Prior to any plan check, all deposit accounts for the processing of this project
shall have no deficits.
C. TIME LIMITS
The approval of Development Review No. 2007-01, Minor Variance
No. 2007-01, and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-06 shall expire
within two years from the date of approval if the use has not been exercised
as defined per Municipal Code Section 22.66.050 (b)(1). The applicant may
request in writing a one year time extension subject to Municipal Code
Section 22.60.050(c) for Planning Commission approval.
14
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2007-17
D. SITE DEVELOPMENT
1 The project - site shall be developed and maintained in substantial
conformance with the approved plans submitted to, approved, and amended
herein by the Planning Commission, collectively labeled and referenced
herein as Exhibit "A" including: site plans, floor plans, architectural
elevations, exterior materials and colors on file in the Planning Division, the
conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, the Specific
Plan, and the Community Plan.
2. Prior to the issuance of any permits, the Applicant shall complete and record
a "Covenant and Agreement to Maintain a Single -Family Residence" on a
form to be provided by the City. The covenant shall be completed and
recorded with the Los Angeles County Recorders Office.
F. SOLID WASTE
The site shall be maintained in a condition, which is free of debris both during
and after the construction, addition, or implementation of the entitlement
approved herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether
during or subsequent to construction shall be done only by the property
owner, applicant or by a duly permitted waste contractor, who has been
authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal of
solid waste from residential, commercial, construction, and industrial areas
within the City. It shall be the applicant's obligation to insure that the waste
contractor used has obtained permits from the City of Diamond Bar to
provide such services.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT,
(909) 839-7040, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
A. GENERAL
An Erosion Control Plan shall be submitted clearly detailing erosion control
measures. These measures shall be implemented during construction
between October 1st and April 15th. The erosion control plan shall conform
to national Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards and
incorporate the appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP's.)
2. Grading and construction activities and the transportation of equipment and
materials and operation of heavy grading equipment shall be limited to
between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday.
Dust generated by grading and construction activities shall be reduced by
watering the soil prior to and during the activities and in accordance with
South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 402 and Rule 403.
15
Planning Commission Resolut+on No. 2007-17
Reclaimed water shall be used whenever possible. Additionally, all
construction equipment shall be properly muffled to reduce noise levels.
B. DRAINAGE
Detailed drainage system information of the lot with careful attention to any
flood hazard area shall be submitted. All drainage/runoff from the
development shall be conveyed from the site to the natural drainage course.
No on-site drainage shall be conveyed to adjacent parcels, unless that is the
natural drainage course.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION,
(909) 839-7020, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
'I. Plans shall conform to State and Local Building Code (i.e., 2001 California
Building Code, California Plumbing Code, California Mechanical Code, and
the 2001 National Electrical Code) requirements and all other applicable
construction codes, ordinances and regulations in effect at the time of plan
check submittal.
2. The minimum design load for wind in this area is 80 M.P.H. exposures "C"
and the site is within seismic zone four (4). The applicant shall submit
drawings and calculations prepared by a California State licensed
Architect/Engineer with wet stamp and signature.
3. This project shall comply with the energy conservation requirements of the
State of California Energy Commission. Kitchen and bathroom lights shall be
fluorescent.
4. Verify adequate exit requirements. The distance between required exits shall
be Y2 of the building diagonal.
5. Building setback from any slope (toe or top) shall meet Chapter 18 of the
2001 California Building Code.
6. Fire Department approval may be required. Contact the Fire Department to
check the fire zone for the location of your property. If this project is located
in High Hazard Fire Zone it shall meet of requirements of the fire zone.
a. All unenclosed under -floor areas shall be constructed as exterior wall.
b. All openings into the attic, floor and/or other enclosed areas shall be
covered with corrosion -resistant wire mesh not less than 1/4 inch or
more than 1 /2 inch in any dimension except where such openings are
equipped with sash or door.
16
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2007-17
7. The project shall be protected by a construction fence and shall comply with
the NPDES & BMP requirements (sand bags, etc.).
8. Check drainage patterns with Engineering Department. Surface water shall
drain away from building at a 2% minimum slope.
9. Specify location of tempered glass as required by code.
10. Specify 1/4"/ft slope for all flat surfaces/ decks with approved water proofing
material. Also, provide guardrail connection detail (height, spacing, etc.)
END
17
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2007-17