HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC 2005-13PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-13
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
NO. 2005-03, MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2005-03,
AND CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT
A ONE STORY ADDITION OF APPROXIMATELY 1,160 SQUARE
FEET OF LIVABLE AREA TO AN EXISTING ONE STORY SINGLE-
FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH APPROXIMATELY 1,288 SQUARE
FEET OF LIVABLE AREA WITH A TWO CAR GARAGE. THE
MINOR CONDITIONAL U E PERMIT APPROVAL WILL ALLOW
EXISTING LEGAL N NCONFORMING SETBACKS AND
SEPARATION BETWEEN RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES ON
ADJOINING PROPERTIES TO REMAIN. THE PROJECT SITE IS
LOCATED AT 2611 CROOKED CREEK DRIVE (LOT 44, TRACT
NO. 25990), DIAMOND BIER, CALIFORNIA.
A. RECITALS
The property owners, Mr. and Mrs. Timothy Keck and applicant, Mr. Mike
Mo, have filed an application for Development Review No. 2005-03, Minor
Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-03 and categorical exemption for a
property located at 2611 Crooked Creek Drive, Diamond Bar, Los Angeles
County, California. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development
Review, Minor Conditional Use Permit and categorical exemption shall be
referred to as the "Application."
2. On March 4, 2005, public hearing notices were mailed to approximately 71
property owners within a 500 -foot radius of the project site and the public
notice was posted in three 'public places. Furthermore, on March 10, 2005,
the project site was posted with a display board. On March 11, 2005,
notification of the public hearing for this project was provided in the San
Gabriel Valley Tribune and Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers.
3. On March 22, 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar
conducted and concluded is duly noticed public hearing on the Application.
B. RESOLUTION
NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows:
1. This Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The Planning Commission hereby finds that the project identified above in
this Resolution is categori ally exempt pursuant to Section 15301(e) of the
California Environmental Qi
thereunder. Furthermore, the
judgment of the City of Dian
ality Act (CEQA) and guidelines promulgated
categorical exemption reflects the independent
and Bar.
3. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds and determines that,
having considered the record as a whole including the findings set forth
below, and changes and alterations which have been incorporated into and
conditioned upon the proposed project set forth in the application, there is no
evidence before this Planning Commission that the project proposed herein
will have the potential of an adverse effect on wild life resources or the
habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Based upon substantial evidence,
this Planning Commission h reby rebuts the presumption of adverse effects
contained in Section 753.5 (d) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations.
4. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein, this Planning
Commission hereby finds as follows:
(a) The project relates to a site located at 2611 Crooked Creek Drive
(Lot 44, Tract No, 251990). It is a rectangular lot of approximately
7,564 square feet. It is developed with a one story single-family
residence, constructed in 1963 with approximately 1,288 square feet
of livable area and 6 two -car garage. The site also contains a
swimming pool and patio cover within the rear portion of the project
site. The swimming pool is under construction with the benefit of a
construction permit. Additionally, if the proposed addition is
approved, the patio cover will be removed.
(b) The project site has a General Plan land use designation of Low
Medium Density Residential (RLM) Maximum 5 DU/AC-
(c) The project site is within the Single -Family Residential -Minimum Lot
Size 7,500 Square Feet (R-1-7,500) zone.
(d) Generally, the following zones and use surround the project site: to
the north are the R-1 7,500 zone and the Brea Canyon Channel; to
the south and east is the R-1-7,500 zone; and to the west is the
Restricted Business ('C-1) zone.
(e) The Application request is for approval to construct a one story
addition of approxim tely 1,160 square feet of livable area to an
existing one story single-family residence of approximately 1,288
square feet of livable area with a two -car garage. The request also
includes approval of a Minor Conditional Use Permit in order to
maintain the following legal non -conforming setbacks: five feet for the
proposed addition instead of the required five and ten foot side yard
setbacks; and separation of 12.5 and 14 feet between residences on
adjoining parcels instead of the required 15 feet.
2
Development Review
(f) The design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with
the applicable elements of the City's General Plan, City Design
Guidelines, and development standards of the applicable district,
design guidelines, and architectural criteria for special areas
(e.g., theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards or
planned developments.)
The project site is an existing lot developed with a single-family
residence in 1963 pq,or to the City of Diamond Bar's incorporation.
According to the tract map, the project site is approximately 7,564
square feet. As such!, it is consistent with the General Plan land use
designation of Low Medium Density Residential (RML) Maximum 5
DU/AC and the proposed addition to the existing residence will
maintain the integr�ty and not degrade this residential area.
Additionally and as cjonditioned within this resolution, the proposed
addition is consistent with the development standards for the RLM
zoning district whichl, apply to the R-1-7,500 zone district for this
project.
The proposed addi�ion will maintain the required height for a
residential structure and not exceed the maximum allowed lot
coverage. Furthermore, through the Minor Conditional Use Permit
process for legal nonconforming setbacks as discussed below in the
Minor Conditional Use Permit findings, the proposed project will seek
to maintain the existing side yard setbacks and existing separation
between structures on adjoining parcels.
The proposed project is consistent with the City's Design Guidelines
related to mat ntaininc the integrity of residential neighborhoods and
open space. The e fisting architectural style (Contemporary) and
colors (earth tones) vi ill be maintained and are compatible with other
residences in the surrounding neighborhood. Additionally, the
existing residence with the proposed addition is comparable in size
with other homes in the surrounding neighborhood.
(g) ' The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere
with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future
development and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards.
As referenced above n finding (t), the proposed project is an addition
to a single-family resi ence. Residences in the neighborhood range
from 1, 280 to 2,429 sz luare feet of livable area. The subject residence
has 9,288 square fee of livable area. With the proposed addition of
1, 960 square feet, thE subject residence will be approximately 2,448
3
square feet of livable
proposed addition w
homes within the neic
rea. Therefore, the subject residence with the
be comparable in square footage to other
The project site is large enough to accommodate the proposed
addition to the existing single-family residence. Additionally, the
proposed project does not change the current land use. As such, the
existing residence with the proposed addition is not expected to
interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future
development. The proposed addition is not expected to create traffic
or pedestrian hazards due to that fact that the single-family residential
use will be maintained. Additionally, Crooked Creek Drive adequately
serves the project site and was established to handle traffic created
by this type of development.
(h) The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible
with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain
the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by
Chapter 22.48.20. Development Review Standards, City Design
Guidelines, the City's !General Plan, or any applicable specific plan.
The existing architectural style is typical 9960's Contemporary and will
remain. However, modifications are proposed such as removing the
existing wood siding on the front fagade and replacing if with stucco
and stone veneer accent, re -roofing, reducing the number of posts at
the front entry and changing the material and colors. The following
materials and colors are proposed:
Roof
GAF Mai
Blend
erial Corp., Grand Sequoia Shingles — Weather Wood
Stucco
La HabrE
Stucco — X-278/Trabuco — dark tan
Trim
La HabrE
Stucco — X-89/0atmeal — off-white
Stone Veneer
Wainsco — 2 ft. high on front fagade and entire chimney - light
tan blend
Proposed colors and materials and alterations to the front facade are
compatible with other homes within the surrounding neighborhood.
Since the architectural style will not change and the addition will be
compatible with the surrounding character of the neighborhood, the
existing residence with the proposed addition will be harmonious,
orderly and attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22.48.20
Development Review Standards, City Design Guidelines, the City's
General Plan as referenced in findings (0 and (g) above. There is no
applicable specific plan for the project area.
The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable
environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its
neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, and color
IH
that will remain aesthetically appealing and will retain a reasonably
adequate level of maintenance.
As referenced in the above Findings (f) through (h), the proposed
project will provide 6 desirable environment for its occupants and
visiting public as well as its neighbors by maintaining good aesthetic
use of materials, texture and color that will remain aesthetically
appealing while offering variety in color and texture related to stucco
and stone accent and a low level of maintenance.
(j) The proposed devel pment will not be detrimental to public health,
safety or welfare or materially injurious (e.g., negative affect on
property values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or
improvements in the icinity; and
Before the issuance of any City permits, the proposed project is
required to comply with all conditions within the approved resolution
and the Building and Safety Division, Public Works Division, and Fire
Department requirements. The referenced agencies through the
permit and inspection process will ensure that the proposed project is
not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially
injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity.
(k) The proposed projet has been reviewed in compliance with the
provisions of the Cali ornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Pursuant to the provi ions of the California Environmental QualityAct
(CEQA), Section 153 1(e), the City has determined that the project
identified above in this Resolution is categorically exempt.
Furthermore, the categorical exemption reflects the independent
judgment of the City of Diamond Bar.
'OR CONDITIONA
(i) The proposed use is
applicable provisions
Code.
As stated in Findings
an existing single -fan
zoning district and cc
standards for that zor
side yard setbacks an
adjacent properties. 7
separation between rE
be allowed with the ap
Use Permit process.
IT
lowed within the subject zoning district with the
of the Development Code and the Municipal
), (g) and (h) above, the proposed addition to
y residence is allowed within the R-1-7,500
relies with all applicable Development Code
tg district except for the legal nonconforming
separation between residential structures on
e existing legal nonconforming setbacks and
idential structures on adjacent properties can
ropriate findings through the Minor Conditional
5
Pursuant to Develop ent Code Section 22.68.030 (a) and (b) —
Restrictions on Non onforming Structures, a structure shall be
deemed nonconforming if the structure fails to conform to the building
envelope regulation (e.g., lot coverage, height, or setback
requirements) as specified for each zoning district. In addition, this
Code section specifies that an addition, enlargement, extension,
reconstruction, relocation, or structural alteration of a legal non-
conforming structure may be allowed with approval of a Minor
Conditional Use Permit with findings specified in Code
Section 22.56.040. Findings specified in Section 22.68.030 for legal
nonconforming structures must also be made. Furthermore,
Section 22.68.030 requires that the exteriorlimits of new construction
do not exceed the applicable height limit or encroach further into the
setbacks than the comparable portion of the existing structure (follow
the development line of the existing structure). However, if the
existing side yard set ack is less than five feet, the exterior limits of
new construction shall maintain a minimum five foot side yard
setback.
Pursuant to Table 24 of Development Code Section 22.08.040, the
required side yard setbacks for the RLM zoning district are five and
ten feet with a 15 foo separation between residential structures on
adjoining properties. The existing residence at the project site has
side yard setbacks of five feet with a 12.5 and 14 foot separation
between residential structures on adjoining properties. The side yard
setbacks which were legal under Los Angeles County's jurisdiction,
when the residence Was constructed, are now considered legal
nonconforming. Additionally, Los Angeles County did not have a
required separation between residential structures on adjoining
properties. The propo ed addition will maintain the existing side yard
setbacks and existing separation between residential structures on
adjoining properties. it will also follow the development line of the
existing residence and will not exceed the maximum height or lot
coverage allowed in t e RLM zoning district.
Staff believes that approving the Minor Conditional Use Permit as
described above for the proposed addition is appropriate and
compatible with other residences in the neighborhood because:
(1) The five foot side yard setback occurs most frequently
in this neighborhood and the proposed addition will still
maintain the required minimum and existing legal
nonconforming five foot side yard setback as specified in
Development Code Section 22.68.030 — Restrictions on
NonconformingStructures;
(2) The existi,
residential
with the orc
legal nonconforming separation between
tures on adjoining properties will be maintained
E?d addition.
(3) Residences range from 9,280 to 2,429 square feet. The
project site is developed with one of smallest residence (9, 288
square feet) in the neighborhood. Even with the proposed
addition, the residence will still be comparable in square
footage to others in the neighborhood.
(4) The propose project is consistent with the General Plan
because it is compatible with the prevailing character of the
surrounding n ighborhood with regard to setbacks, separation
between rest ntial structures on adjoining parcels, height, lot
coverage, arc itectural style, colors and materials.
(5) Considering the width of the project site and the placement of
the residence on the site, a one story addition could only occur
within the rear portion of the project site. A second story
addition could be considered but due to the project site's width
and existing setbacks, a second story addition would not relate
in scale to the project site or adjacent residences.
(6) By maintaining the existing setbacks and separation between
residential structures on adjoining lots which is consistent with
the rest of the neighborhood and keeping the proposed
addition in scale with the project site and the rest of the
neighborhood, the proposed project will increase the value of
the subject residence and other residences in the
neighborhood.'
(m) The proposed usei consistent with the General Plan and any
applicable specific pi n;
As stated in Finding ( above, the proposed addition is consistent with
the General Plan and there is no applicable specific plan.
(n) The design, location, size and operating characteristics of the
proposed use are corripatible with the existing and future land uses in
the vicinity;
As stated in Findings , (g, (h), (i) and (1) above, the design, location,
size and operating characteristics of the proposed addition are
compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity,-
(o)
icinity;(o) The subject site is phy ically suitable for the type and density/intensity
of use being propo ed including access, provision of utilities,
7
compatibility with adjoining land uses, and the absence of physical
constraints;
As stated in Findings (f), (g, (h), (i) and (1) above, the project site is
physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of proposed
addition including access, provision of utilities, compatibility with
adjoining land uses, and the absence of physical constraints;
(p) Granting the Minor C
the public interest, h
improvements in the
located; and
Soils report, Fire Dep
plan check, City perms
These processes will
detrimental to the pubs
property, or improvem
the property is locatec
nditional Use Permit will not be detrimental to
alth, safety, injurious to persons, property, or
cinity and zoning district in which the property is
rtment requirements and approval, structural
and inspections are required for construction.
ensure that the finished project will not be
c interest, health, safety, injurious to persons,
ants in the vicinity and zoning district in which
(q) The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental QualityAct
(CEQA), Section 153 1(e), the City has determined that the project
identified above in this Resolution is categorically exempt.
Furthermore, the categorical exemption reflects the independent
judgment of the City o Diamond Bar.
NONCONFORMING
The proposed addition will not result in the structure becoming.
(r) Incompatible with other structures in the neighborhood.
Residences in the nei hborhood range from 1,280 to 2,429 square
feet of livable area. The subject residence has 1,288 square feet of
livable area. With the proposed addition of 1,160 square feet, the
subject residence will be approximately 2,448 square feet of livable
area. Therefore, the s bject residence with the proposed addition will
be comparable in s care footage to other homes within the
neighborhood.
The existing architectural style is typical 1960's Contemporary and will
remain. However, modifications are proposed such as removing the
existing wood siding o the front facade and replacing it with stucco
and stone veneer accent, re -roofing, reducing the number of posts at
0
the front entry and ch raging the material and colors. Fven with these
minor modifications, the existing single-family residence with the
proposed addition w 11 be compatible with other residences in the
neighborhood.
The existing residen
a at the project site has side yard setbacks of
five feet with a 12.5
and 14 foot separation between residential
structures on adjoining
properties. The side yard setbacks which
were legal under Los
Angeles County's jurisdiction when the
residence was const r
cted are now considered legal nonconforming.
Additionally, Los Ang
les County did not have a required separation
between residential structures
on adjoining properties. The proposed
addition will maintain
the existing side yard setbacks and existing
separation between residential
structures on adjoining properties. It
will also follow the de
velopment line of the existing residence and will
not exceed the maximum
height or lot coverage allowed in the RLM
zoning district. By maintaining
the existing setbacks and separation
between residential
tructures on adjoining lots which is consistent
with the rest of the neighborhood
and keeping the proposed addition
in scale with the project
site and the rest of the neighborhood, the
proposed project will ir7crease
the value of the subject residence and
other residences in th
neighborhood. Therefore, the existing single-
family residence with
the proposed addition is compatible with the
prevailing character of
the surrounding neighborhood with regard to
setbacks, separation
between residential structures on adjoining
parcels, height, lot co
erage, architectural style, colors and materials
and will not result in in
ompatibility with other single-family residences
in the neighborhood.
(s) Inconsistent with the �eneral Plan or any applicable specific plan.
The project site is a existing lot developed with a single-family
residence in 1963 prior to the City of Diamond Bar's incorporation.
According to the tract map, the project site is approximately 7,564
square feet. As such, it is consistent with the General Plan land use
designation of Low M dium Density Residential (RML) Maximum 5
DU/AC and the proposed addition to the existing residence will
maintain the integrity and not degrade this residential area.
Additionally and as conditioned within this resolution, the proposed
addition is consistent with the development standards for the RLM
zoning district which pply to the R-1-7,500 zone district for this
project.
(t) A restriction to the leventuai/future compliance with applicable
regulations of this De lopment Code.
E
Approval of the Min
continuation of a le
result in restricting &
Development Code
findings (I) and (r) al
Conditional Use Permit, which will permit the
it nonconforming side yard setbacks will not
re compliance with the applicable Diamond Bar
gulations due to specific issues addressed in
�u) Detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of persons
residing in the neighb rhood.
Based on finding mentioned above and conditions of approval, the
proposed addition a d other minor improvements will not be
detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of persons
residing in the neighborhood.
(v) Detrimental and/or injurious to property and improvements in the
neighborhood.
Based on findings me tioned above and conditions of approval, the
proposed addition and other minor improvements will not be
detrimental and/or injurious to property and improvements in the
neighborhood.
5. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth above, the Planning
Commission hereby approv s the Application subject to the following
conditions:
(a) The project shall su stantially conform to site plan, floor plan,
elevations and colorsi materials collectively labeled as Exhibit "A"
dated March 22, 2005 as submitted and approved by the Planning
Commission, and as a ended herein.
(b) The site shall be maintained in a condition, which is free of debris
both during and after the construction, addition, or implementation of
the entitlement grantec herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and
refuse, whether during or subsequent to construction shall be done
only by the property owner, applicant or by a duly permitted waste
contractor, who has be n authorized by the City to provide collection,
transportation, and disposal of solid waste from residential,
commercial, construction and industrial areas within the City. It shall
be the applicant's oblig tion to insure that the waste contractor utilized
has obtained permits fi m the City of Diamond Bar to provide such
services.
(c) Prior to the issuance of any City permits, the applicant shall submit a
final landscape/irrigation plan for the City's review and approval. Said
plan shall delineate the replacement of landscaping and irrigation
destroyed during construction. Prior to final inspection or Certificate
10
of Occupancy, front yard landscaping/irrigation destroyed during
construction shall be replaced.
(d) Prior to construction, the applicant shall install temporary construction
fencing pursuant to the Building and Safety Division's requirements
along the project perimeter.
(e) Wet bar in master bedroom shall not contain any kitchen facilities
(i.e., cooking stove with or without an oven; kitchen sink, cabinets and
appurtenant plumbing; convection ovens; and all appurtenances
related to a kitchen.)
(f) The proposed additic n shall maintain a minimum side yard setback of
five feet and a minimum separation distance between residential
structures on adjoining properties of 14 feet to the north and 12.5 feet
to the south.
(g) Prior to the issuance Of any City permits, the applicant shall submit an
erosion control plan. Erosion control measures shall be in place for
construction starting after October 1 through April 15.
(h) Before the issuance f any City permits, the applicant shall submit an
erosion control plan for the City's review and approval. The erosion
control plan shall conform to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) standards and incorporate the appropriate Best
Management Practices (BMP's) during and after construction.
Additionally, the applicant shall obtain the necessary NPDES permits.
(i) Applicant shall comply with Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation
Plan (SUSMP) requirements to the satisfaction of the City engineer.
Best Management Practices (BMP's) are required to be incorporated
into the project plans for both construction and post construction
activities. BMP's are detailed in the latest edition of the California
Storm Water Best M nagement Practices Handbook or BMP's Fact
Sheets can be obtained through the Public Works Division.
(j) Prior to the issuance of any City permits, the applicant shall submit a
drainage plan for the City's review and approval. All drainage/runoff
from the subject property shall be conveyed from the site to the
natural drainage course. No on-site drainage shall be conveyed to
adjacent parcels. Surface water shall drain away from the building at
a two percent minimum slope.
(k) The single-family residence shall not be utilized in a manner that
creates adverse effects (i.e., significant levels of dust, glare/light,
noise, odor, traffic, or other disturbances) upon the neighborhood and
environmental setting. Additionally, the single-family residence shall
not result in significantly adverse effects on public services or
11
resources. No portic
commercial/institution
dwelling. The properl
result in a nuisance
neighborhood.
{I) Prior to the issuance c
and record a "Covens
Residence" on a form
be completed and rec
Office.
(m) For plan check subrr
calculations prepared
and signature.
(n) The proposed resid
Conservation Standai
n of the residence shall be rented, used for
al purposes, or otherwise utilized as a separate
y shall not be used for regular gatherings that
)r create traffic and parking problems in the
any City permits, the Applicant shall complete
t and Agreement to Maintain a Single -Family
D be provided by the City. The covenant shall
rded with the Los Angeles County Recorders
tal, the applicant shall submit drawings and
y a licensed architect/engineer with wet stamp
ice shall comply with the State Energy
S.
(o) Prior to the issuance of any construction permits, the applicant shall
submit construction plans to the Los Angeles County Fire Department
for review and approval and to determine the fire zone for the project
site.
(p) If the project site is I cated within "high fire zone", the proposed
project shall meet the following requirements of said zone:
(1) All roof coverin shall be "Fire Retardant." Tile roof shall be
fire stopped at the eaves to preclude entry of the flame or
members under the fire.
(2) All unenclosed under -floor areas shall be constructed as
exterior walls.
(3) All openings into the attic, floor and/or other enclosed areas
shall be covered with corrosion -resistant wire mesh not less
than 114 inch or more than 112 inch in dimension except where
such openings are equipped with sash or door.
(4) Chimneys shat have spark arrests of maximum 112 inch
screen.
(q) Construction plans shall be engineered to meet wind loads of
80 M.P.H. with a "C exposure.
(r) Plans shall conform to State and Local Building Code (i.e., 2001
Uniform Building Code Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical
Code, and the 2001 National Electrical Code) requirements.
2
(s) All new bedrooms a
hard wired smoke d
hallways leading to sleeping areas shall have
ctors with battery back-up.
(t) If required by the Building Official, kitchen and bathroom lights shall
be fluorescent.
(u) Prior to plan check submittal, the applicant shall verify the distance
between the new addition and swimming pool under construction. If
required by the Bui ding Official adequate distance between the
addition and swimmi g pool must be maintained to avoid surcharge
into the swimming p of walls.
(v) This grant is valid for two years and shall be exercised
(i.e., construction started) within that period or this grant shall expire.
A one-year extension of time may be approved when submitted to the
City in writing at least 60 days prior to the expiration date. The
Planning Commission will consider the extension request at a duly
noticed public hearing in accordance with Chapter 22.72 of the City of
Diamond Bar Development Code.
(w) This grant shall not e effective for any purpose until the permittee
and owner of the property involved (if other than the permittee) have
filed, within fifteen (0) days of approval of this grant, at the City of
Diamond Bar Com unity and Development Services Department,
their affidavit stating that they are aware of and agree to accept all the
conditions of this grant. Further, this grant shall not be effective until
the permittee pays remaining City processing fees, school fees and
fees for the review of submitted reports.
(x) If the Department of Fish and Game determines that Fish and Game
Code Section 711.4 applies to the approval of this project, then the
applicant shall remit to the City, within five days of this grant's
approval, a cashier's check of $25.00 for a documentary handling fee
in connection with Fish and Game Code requirements. Furthermore, if
this project Is not exempt from a filing fee imposed because the
project has more than a deminimis impact on fish and wildlife, the
applicant shall also Day to the Department of Fish and Game any
such fee and any fine which the Department determines to be owed.
The Planning Commission shall:
(a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution: and
(b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail,
to: Mr. and Mrs. Timothy Keck, 2611 Crooked Creek Drive, Diamond
Bar, CA 91765, and Mr. Mike Mo, 317 W. Main Street, #202,
Alhambra, CA 9180
13
APPROVED AND ADOPTED TF
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
BY:
Joe McManus, Chairman
IS 22ND DAYOF MARCH 2005, BY THE
OF DIAMOND BAR.
I, Jame DeStefano, Planning Commissio Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resol' tion was duly introduced, passed, E nd adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Diamond Bar, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd
day of March 2005, by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners: *e, Nolan, Tanaka, V/C Low, Chair/McManus
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners: None
ABSTAIN
ATTEST:
Commissioners:
games De0tefano,
14
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-13
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
NO. 2005-03, MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2005-03,
AND CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT
A ONE STORY ADDITION OF APPROXIMATELY 1,160 SQUARE
FEET OF LIVABLE AREATO AN EXISTING ONE STORY SINGLE-
FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH APPROXIMATELY 1,288 SQUARE
FEET OF LIVABLE AREA WITH A TWO CAR GARAGE. THE
MINOR CONDITIONAL U E PERMIT APPROVAL WILL ALLOW
EXISTING LEGAL N NCONFORMING SETBACKS AND
SEPARATION BETWEEN RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES ON
ADJOINING PROPERTIES TO REMAIN. THE PROJECT SITE IS
LOCATED AT 2611 CROOKED CREEK DRIVE (LOT 44, TRACT
NO. 25990), DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA.
A. RECITALS
The property owners, Mr. and Mrs. Timothy Keck and applicant, Mr. Mike
Mo, have filed an application for Development Review No. 2005-03, Minor
Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-03 and categorical exemption for a
property located at 2611 Crooked Creek Drive, Diamond Bar, Los Angeles
County, California. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development
Review, Minor Conditional Use Permit and categorical exemption shall be
referred to as the "Application."
On March 4, 2005, public hearing notices were mailed to approximately 71
property owners within a 500 -foot radius of the project site and the public
notice was posted in three public places. Furthermore, on March 10, 2005,
the project site was posted with a display board. On March 11, 2005,
notification of the public hearing for this project was provided in the San
Gabriel Valley Tribune and Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers.
3. On March 22, 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar
conducted and concluded is duly noticed public hearing on the Application.
B. RESOLUTION
NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows:
This Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part , of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The Planning Commissiohereby finds that the project identified above in
this Resolution is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15301(e) of the
California Environmental Qality Act (CEQA) and guidelines promulgated
thereunder. Furthermore, th categorical exemption reflects the independent
judgment of the City of Dia and Bar.
3. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds and determines that,
having considered the record as a whole including the findings set forth
below, and changes and alterations which have been incorporated into and
conditioned upon the proposed project set forth in the application, there is no
evidence before this Planning Commission that the project proposed herein
will have the potential of an adverse effect on wild life resources or the
habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Based upon substantial evidence,
this Planning Commission h reby rebuts the presumption of adverse effects
contained in Section 753.5 (d) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations.
Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein, this Planning
Commission hereby finds as follows:
(a) The project relates to a site located at 2611 Crooked Creek Drive
(Lot 44, Tract No. 251990). It is a rectangular lot of approximately
7,564 square feet. It is developed with a one story single-family
residence, constructed in 1963 with approximately 1,288 square feet
of livable area and 6 two -car garage. The site also contains a
swimming pool and patio cover within the rear portion of the project
site. The swimming pool is under construction with the benefit of a
construction permit. Additionally, if the proposed addition is
approved, the patio cover will be removed.
(b) The project site has a General Plan land use designation of Low
Medium Density Residential (RLM) Maximum 5 DU/AC.
(c) The project site is within the Single -Family Residential -Minimum Lot
Size 7,500 Square Feet (R-1-7,500) zone.
(d) Generally, the following zones and use surround the project site: to
the north are the R-1-7,500 zone and the Brea Canyon Channel; to
the south and east is the R-1-7,500 zone; and to the west is the
Restricted Business (C-1) zone.
(e) The Application request is for approval to construct a one story
addition of approxim tely 1,160 square feet of livable area to an
existing one story si
square feet of livable
includes approval of
maintain the following
proposed addition in
setbacks; and separa
adjoining parcels inst
igle-family residence of approximately 1,288
area with a two -car garage. The request also
a Minor Conditional Use Permit in order to
legal non -conforming setbacks: five feet for the
tead of the required five and ten foot side yard
ion of 12.5 and 14 feet between residences on
ad of the required 15 feet.
2
Development Review
M
(9)
The design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with
the applicable elements of the City's General Plan, City Design
Guidelines, and development standards of the applicable district,
design guidelines, and architectural criteria for special areas
(e.g., theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards or
planned developments.)
The project site is in existing lot developed with a single-family
residence in 1963 pq,or to the City of Diamond Bar's incorporation.
According to the tract map, the project site is approximately 7,564
square feet. As such,, it is consistent with the General Plan land use
designation of Low Medium Density Residential (RML) Maximum 5
DU/AC and the proposed addition to the existing residence will
maintain the integrity and not degrade this residential area.
Additionally and as conditioned within this resolution, the proposed
addition is consistent with the development standards for the RLM
zoning district whichl apply to the R-1-7,500 zone district for this
project.
The proposed addition will maintain the required height for a
residential structure
coverage. Furtherm
and not exceed the maximum allowed lot
re, through the Minor Conditional Use Permit
process for legal nonlcon forming setbacks as discussed below in the
Minor Conditional Use Permit findings, the proposed project will seek
to maintain the existing side yard setbacks and existing separation
between structures on adjoining parcels.
The proposed project is consistent with the City's Design Guidelines
related to maintaining the integrity of residential neighborhoods and
open space. Thee fisting architectural style (Contemporary) and
colors (earth tones) will be maintained and are compatible with other
residences in the surrounding neighborhood. Additionally, the
existing residence with the proposed addition is comparable in size
with other homes in the surrounding neighborhood.
The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere
with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future
development and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards.
As referenced above
to a single-family resi
from 1,280 to 2,429 s(
has 1,288 square fee
1,160 square feet, the
n finding (f), the proposed project is an addition
fence. Residences in the neighborhood range
luare feet of livable area. The subject residence
'of livable area. With the proposed addition of
subject residence will be approximately 2,448
3
square feet of livable urea. Therefore, the subject residence with the
proposed addition wyll be comparable in square footage to other
homes within the neighborhood.
The project site is large enough to accommodate the proposed
addition to the existing single-family residence. Additionally, the
proposed project does not change the current land use. As such, the
existing residence with the proposed addition is not expected to
interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future
development. The proposed addition is not expected to create traffic
or pedestrian hazards due to that fact that the single-family residential
use will be maintained. Additionally, Crooked Creek Drive adequately
serves the project site and was established to handle traffic created
by this type of development.
(h) The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible
with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain
the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by
Chapter 22.48.20. Development Review Standards, City Design
Guidelines, the City's !General Plan, or any applicable specific plan.
The existing architectural style is typical 1960's Contemporary and will
remain. However, modifications are such as the
proposed removing texisting wood siding n the front facade and replacing it with stucco
and stone veneeracc*nt, re -roofing, reducing the number of posts at
the front entry and chpnging the material and colors. The following
materials and colors are proposed:
Roof GAF Ma ria/ Corp., Grand Sequoia Shingles - Weather Wood
Blend
Stucco La Habr Stucco - X-278/Trabuco - dark tan
Trim La Habr Stucco - X-81/Oatmeal - off-white
Stone Veneer Wainsco - 2 ft. high on front facade and entire chimney - light
tan blend
Proposed colors and materials and alterations to the front facade are
compatible with other homes within the surrounding neighborhood.
Since the architectural style will not change and the addition will be
compatible with the surrounding character of the neighborhood, the
existing residence with the proposed addition will be harmonious,
orderly and attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22.48.20
Development Review Standards, City Design Guidelines, the City's
General Plan as referenced in findings (0 and (g) above. There is no
applicable specific plan for the project area.
(i) The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable
environment for its o cupants and visiting public as well as its
neighbors through goo aesthetic use of materials, texture, and color
4
that will remain aesthetically appealing and will retain a reasonably
adequate level of m mtenance.
As referenced in the above Findings (f) through (h), the proposed
project will provide desirable environment for its occupants and
visiting public as well as its neighbors by maintaining good aesthetic
use of materials, texture and color that will remain aesthetically
appealing while offering variety in color and texture related to stucco
and stone accent and a low level of maintenance.
(j) The proposed development will not be detrimental to public health,
safety or welfare or materially injurious (e.g., negative affect on
property values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or
improvements in the vicinity; and
Before the issuance of any City permits, the proposed project is
required to comply with all conditions within the approved resolution
and the Building and Safety Division, Public Works Division, and Fire
Department requirements. The referenced agencies through the
permit and inspection process will ensure that the proposed project is
not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially
injurious to the prope ties or improvements in the vicinity.
(k) The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the
provisions of the Cali
Pursuant to the provis
(CEQA), Section 153
identified above in
Furthermore, the cai
judgment of the City c
ornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
ions of the California Environmental QualityAct
31(e), the City has determined that the project
this Resolution is categorically exempt.
egorical exemption reflects the independent
if Diamond Bar.
MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
(I) The proposed use is a
applicable provisions
Code.
lowed within the subject zoning district with the
of the Development Code and the Municipal
As stated in Findings 1), (g) and (h) above, the proposed addition to
an existing single-family residence is allowed within the R-1-7,500
zoning district and complies with all applicable Development Code
standards for that zoning district except for the legal nonconforming
side yard setbacks an separation between residential structures on
adjacent properties. The existing legal nonconforming setbacks and
separation between residential structures on adjacent properties can
be allowed with the appropriate findings through the Minor Conditional
Use Permit process.
5
Pursuant to Develop ent Code Section 22.68.030 (a) and (b) -
Restrictions on Non onforming Structures, a structure shall be
deemed nonconforming if the structure fails to conform to the building
envelope regulation (e.g., lot coverage, height, or setback
requirements) as specified for each zoning district. In addition, this
Code section specifies that an addition, enlargement, extension,
reconstruction, relocation, or structural alteration of a legal non-
conforming structure may be allowed with approval of a Minor
Conditional Use Permit with findings specified in Code
Section 22.56.040. Fkndings specified in Section 22.68.030 for legal
nonconforming strut ures must also be made. Furthermore,
Section 22.68.030 requires that the exterior limits of new construction
do not exceed the applicable height limit or encroach further into the
setbacks than the comparable portion of the existing structure (follow
the development line of the existing structure). However, if the
existing side yard setback is less than five feet, the exterior limits of
new construction shall maintain a minimum five foot side yard
setback.
Pursuant to Table 2-4 of Development Code Section 22.08.040, the
required side yard setbacks for the RLM zoning district are five and
ten feet with a 15 foo— separation between residential structures on
adjoining properties. The existing residence at the project site has
side yard setbacks o five feet with a 12.5 and 14 foot separation
between residential st uctures on adjoining properties. The side yard
setbacks which were egal under Los Angeles County's jurisdiction,
when the residence Was constructed, are now considered legal
nonconforming. Additionally, Los Angeles County did not have a
required separation 4etween residential structures on adjoining
properties. The propo ed addition will maintain the existing side yard
setbacks and existing separation between residential structures on
adjoining properties. It will also follow the development line of the
existing residence and will not exceed the maximum height or lot
coverage allowed in tt e RLM zoning district.
Staff believes that approving the minor conditional Use Permit as
described above for !the proposed addition is appropriate and
compatible with other residences in the neighborhood because:
(1)
The five foot ide yard setback occurs most frequently
in this neighborhood and the proposed addition will still
maintain the required minimum and existing legal
nonconforming five foot side yard setback as specified in
Development Code Section 22.68.030 - Restrictions on
Nonconforming Structures;
6
(2) The existing legal nonconforming separation between
residential structures on adjoining properties will be maintained
with the proposed addition.
(m)
(3) Residences range from 1,280 to 2,429 square feet. The
project site is eveloped with one of smallest residence (1,288
square feet) the neighborhood. Even with the proposed
addition, the residence will still be comparable in square
footage to others in the neighborhood.
(4)
The propose
because it is
surrounding n
between resia
coverage, arc
project is consistent with the General Plan
ompatible with the prevailing character of the
ighborhood with regard to setbacks, separation
ntial structures on adjoining parcels, height, lot
itectural style, colors and materials.
(5)
(6)
consistent with the General Plan and any
applicable specific plan;
Considering ti
the residence
within the res
addition could
and existing sf
in scale to the
By maintaininc
residential stru
the rest of tt
addition in sc
,e width of the project site and the placement of
Dn the site, a one story addition could only occur
r portion of the project site. A second story
be considered but due to the project site's width
tbacks, a second story addition would not relate
project site or adjacent residences.
the existing setbacks and separation between
ctures on adjoining lots which is consistent with
e neighborhood and keeping the proposed
le with the project site and the rest of the
neighborhood, the proposed project will increase the value of
the subject residence and other residences in the
neighborhood.
The proposed use
As stated in Finding (I) above, the proposed addition is consistent with
the General Plan and
there is no applicable specific plan.
(n) The design, locationl, size and operating characteristics of the
proposed use are co
the vicinity;
As stated in Findings
size and operating
compatible with the e
patible with the existing and future land uses in
0, (g, (h), (i) and (1) above, the design, location,
haracteristics of the proposed addition are
fisting and future land uses in the vicinity;
(o) The subject site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity
of use being proposed including access, provision of utilities,
compatibility with adj
constraints;
(p)
(q)
As stated in Findings
physically suitable fo
addition including ac
adjoining land uses, a
ining land uses, and the absence of physical
(0, (g, (h), (i) and (I) above, the project site is
the type and density/intensity of proposed
;ess, provision of utilities, compatibility with
rid the absence of physical constraints;
Granting the Minor Cc nditional Use Permit will not be detrimental to
the public interest, health, safety, injurious to persons, property, or
improvements in the vicinity and zoning district in which the property is
located; and
Soils report, Fire Dep rtment requirements and approval, structural
plan check, City permi sand inspections are required for construction.
These processes will ensure that the finished project will not be
detrimental to the pub c interest, health, safety, injurious to persons,
property, or improvem nts in the vicinity and zoning district in which
the property is locate
The proposed project
provisions of the Califo
Pursuant to the provisi
(CEQA), Section 1536
identified above in
Furthermore, the cate
judgment of the City o,
has been reviewed in compliance with the
rnia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
ons of the California Environmental QualityAct
1(e), the City has determined that the project
this Resolution is categorically exempt.
gorical exemption reflects the independent
Diamond Bar.
NONCONFORMING
The proposed addition will not resul in the structure becoming:
(r) Incompatible with other structures in the neighborhood.
Residences in the nei hborhood range from 1,280 to 2,429 square
feet of livable area. The subject residence has 1,288 square feet of
livable area. With the proposed addition of 1,160 square feet, the
subject residence will be approximately 2,448 square feet of livable
area. Therefore, the subject residence with the proposed addition will
be comparable in square footage to other homes within the
neighborhood.
The existing architectu
remain. However, mo
existing wood siding of
and stone veneer acce
al style is typical 1960's Contemporary and will
ifications are proposed such as removing the
' the front facade and replacing it with stucco
it, re -roofing, reducing the number of posts at
the front entry and ch nging the material and colors. Even with these
minor modifications, the existing single-family residence with the
proposed addition w.11 be compatible with other residences in the
neighborhood.
The existing residen a at the project site has side yard setbacks of
five feet with a 12. and 14 foot separation between residential
structures on adjoini g properties. The side yard setbacks which
were legal under os Angeles County's jurisdiction when the
residence was constr cted are now considered legal nonconforming.
Additionally, Los Ang les County did not have a required separation
between residential s ructures on adjoining properties. The proposed
addition will maintai the existing side yard setbacks and existing
separation between sidential structures on adjoining properties. It
will also follow the de elopment line of the existing residence and will
not exceed the maxi um height or lot coverage allowed in the RLM
zoning district. By m intaining the existing setbacks and separation
between residential structures on adjoining lots which is consistent
with the rest of the ne "ghborhood and keeping the proposed addition
in scale with the proj ct site and the rest of the neighborhood, the
proposed project will / crease the value of the subject residence and
other residences in th neighborhood. Therefore, the existing single-
family residence with the proposed addition is compatible with the
prevailing character o the surrounding neighborhood with regard to
setbacks, separation between residential structures on adjoining
parcels, height, lot co erage, architectural style, colors and materials
and will not result in in ompatibility with other single-family residences
in the neighborhood.
(s) Inconsistent with the
The project site is a
residence in 1963 pri
According to the tract
square feet. As such,
designation of Low M
DU/AC and the prop
maintain the integrit.
Additionally and as cc
addition is consistent
zoning district which
project.
eneral Plan or any applicable specific plan.
7 existing lot developed with a single-family
)r to the City of Diamond Bar's incorporation.
map, the project site is approximately 7,564
it is consistent with the General Plan land use
1-dium Density Residential (RML) Maximum 5
osed addition to the existing residence will
v and not degrade this residential area.
nditioned within this resolution, the proposed
with the development standards for the RLM
apply to the R-1-7,500 zone district for this
(t) A restriction to the eventual/future compliance with applicable
regulations of this De 31opment Code.
Approval of the Mino Conditional Use Permit, which will permit the
continuation of a leg I nonconforming side yard setbacks will not
(u)
result in restricting futt
Development Code re
findings (1) and (r) ab
Detrimental to the hE
residing in the neighb
re compliance with the applicable Diamond Bar
gulations due to specific issues addressed in
ve.
alth, safety and general welfare of persons
rhood.
Based on finding mer
proposed addition a,
detrimental to the he
residing in the neighbc
tioned above and conditions of approval, the
id other minor improvements will not be
slth, safety and general welfare of persons
rhood.
(v) Detrimental and/or injurious to property and improvements in the
neighborhood.
Based on findings me
proposed addition a
detrimental and/or inj
neighborhood.
tioned above and conditions of approval, the
d other minor improvements will not be
rious to property and improvements in the
Based on the findings and conclusions set forth above, the Planning
Commission hereby approv
conditions:
(a) The project shall sul
elevations and colors,
dated March 22, 2005
Commission, and as a
s the Application subject to the following
stantially conform to site plan, floor plan,
materials collectively labeled as Exhibit "A"
as submitted and approved by the Planning
vended herein.
(b) The site shall be maintained in a condition, which is free of debris
both during and after the construction, addition, or implementation of
the entitlement grante herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and
refuse, whether during or subsequent to construction shall be done
only by the property owner, applicant or by a duly permitted waste
contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide collection,
transportation, and isposal of solid waste from residential,
commercial, constructs n and industrial areas within the City. It shall
be the applicant's oblig tion to insure that the waste contractor utilized
has obtained permits f om the City of Diamond Bar to provide such
services.
(c) Prior to the issuance o any City permits, the applicant shall submit a
final landscape/irrigation plan for the City's review and approval. Said
plan shall delineate the replacement of landscaping and irrigation
destroyed during const uction. Prior to final inspection or Certificate
10
of Occupancy, front yard landscaping/irrigation destroyed during
construction shall b replaced.
(d) Prior to construction, the applicant shall install temporary construction
fencing pursuant to he Building and Safety Division's requirements
along the project perimeter.
(e) Wet bar in master bedroom shall not contain any kitchen facilities
(i.e., cooking stove with or without an oven; kitchen sink, cabinets and
appurtenant plumbing, convection ovens; and all appurtenances
related to a kitchen.)
M
(g)
The proposed additi n shall maintain a minimum side yard setback of
five feet and a minimum separation distance between residential
structures on adjoining properties of 14 feet to the north and 12.5 feet
to the south.
Prior to the issuance Of any City permits, the applicant shall submit an
erosion control plan. Erosion control measures shall be in place for
construction starting after October 1 through April 15.
(h) Before the issuance
erosion control plan i
control plan shall con
System (NPDES) st,
Management Practi
Additionally, the appl
(i)
G)
f any City permits, the applicant shall submit an
or the City's review and approval. The erosion
form to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
nndards and incorporate the appropriate Best
:es (BMP's) during and after construction.
cant shall obtain the necessary NPDES permits.
0
Applicant shall comp y with Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation
Plan (SUSMP) requi ements to the satisfaction of the City engineer.
Best Management Practices (BMP's) are required to be incorporated
into the project plan for both construction and post construction
activities. BMP's are detailed in the latest edition of the California
Storm Water Best Management Practices Handbook or BMP's Fact
Sheets can be obtai ed through the Public Works Division.
Prior to the issuance f any City permits, the applicant shall submit a
drainage plan for the City's review and approval. All drainage/runoff
from the subject property shall be conveyed from the site to the
natural drainage cou se. No on-site drainage shall be conveyed to
adjacent parcels. Su face water shall drain away from the building at
a two percent minimum slope.
(k) The single-family residence shall not be utilized in a manner that
creates adverse effects (i.e., significant levels of dust, glare/light,
noise, odor, traffic, or other disturbances) upon the neighborhood and
environmental setting. Additionally, the single-family residence shall
not result in significantly adverse effects on public services or
11
resources. No portic
commercial/institution
dwelling. The propert
result in a nuisance
neighborhood.
(I)
(m)
(n)
(0)
Prior to the issuance o
and record a "Covens
Residence" on a form
be completed and reci
Office.
n of the residence shall be rented, used for
al purposes, or otherwise utilized as a separate
y shall not be used for regular gatherings that
or create traffic and parking problems in the
any City permits, the Applicant shall complete
it and Agreement to Maintain a Single -Family
o be provided by the City. The covenant shall
)rded with the Los Angeles County Recorders
For plan check subm ttal, the applicant shall submit drawings and
calculations prepared y a licensed architect/engineer with wet stamp
and signature.
The proposed resid
Conservation Standar
Prior to the issuance
submit construction pl
for review and approv
site.
nce shall comply with the State Energy
S.
e
f any construction permits, the applicant shall
ins to the Los Angeles County Fire Department
I and to determine the fire zone for the project
(p) If the project site is I
project shall meet the
Icated within "high fire zone", the proposed
ollowing requirements of said zone:
(1) All roof coverin shall be "Fire Retardant." Tile roof shall be
fire stopped at the eaves to preclude entry of the flame or
members uncle the fire.
(2) All unenclosed under -floor areas shall be constructed as
exterior walls.
(3) All openings in the attic, floor and/or other enclosed areas
shall be covered with corrosion -resistant wire mesh not less
than 1/4 inch or more than 1/2 inch in dimension except where
such openings are equipped with sash or door.
(4) Chimneys shal have spark arrests of maximum 1/2 inch
screen.
(q) Construction plans shall be engineered to meet wind loads of
80 M.P.H. with a "C" exposure.
(r) Plans shall conform t State and Local Building Code (i.e., 2001
Uniform Building Code Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical
Code, and the 2001 N tional Electrical Code) requirements.
(s) All new bedrooms and hallways leading to sleeping areas shall have
hard wired smoke detectors with battery back-up.
(t) If required by the Building Official, kitchen and bathroom lights shall
be fluorescent.
(u) Prior to plan check submittal, the applicant shall verify the distance
between the new addition and swimming pool under construction. If
required by the Bui ding Official adequate distance between the
addition and swimmi g pool must be maintained to avoid surcharge
into the swimming pool walls.
(v) This grant is valid for two years and shall be exercised
(i.e., construction started) within that period or this grant shall expire.
A one-year extensior of time may be approved when submitted to the
City in writing at least 60 days prior to the expiration date. The
Planning Commission will consider the extension request at a duly
noticed public hearing in accordance with Chapter 22.72 of the City of
Diamond Bar Development Code.
(w)
This grant shall not
and owner of the pro
filed, within fifteen (:
Diamond Bar Comrr
their affidavit stating'
conditions of this gra
the permittee pays n
fees for the review o
e effective for any purpose until the permittee
oerty involved (if other than the permittee) have
0) days of approval of this grant, at the City of
unity and Development Services Department,
hat they are aware of and agree to accept all the
it. Further, this grant shall not be effective until
!maining City processing fees, school fees and
submitted reports.
(x)
If the Department of
Code Section 711.4
applicant shall remi
approval, a cashier's
in connection with Fi!
this project is not e
project has more the
applicant shall also
such fee and any fin(
The Planning Commission shal
=ish and Game determines that Fish and Game
applies to the approval of this project, then the
t to the City, within five days of this grant's
check of $25.00 for a documentary handling fee
•h and Game Code requirements. Furthermore, if
.empt from a filing fee imposed because the
in a deminimis impact on fish and wildlife, the
pay to the Department of Fish and Game any
which the Department determines to be owed.
(a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and
(b) Forthwith transmit a ertified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail,
to: Mr. and Mrs. Timothy Keck, 2611 Crooked Creek Drive, Diamond
Bar, CA 91765, and Mr. Mike Mo, 317 W. Main Street, #202,
Alhambra, CA 9180
13
APPROVED AND ADOPTED TIIIS 22ND DAYOF MARCH 2005, BY THE
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITYIOF DIAMOND BAR.
BY:
C/(L(II-LL
j' Joe McManus, Chairman
I, JamerDeStefano, Planning Commissio Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resol' tion was duly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Diamond Bar, at a regular meetin of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd
day of March 2005, by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners: —ye, Nolan, Tanaka, V/C Low, Chair/McManus
NOES: Commissioners: None
ABSENT: Commissioners:
one
ABSTAIN: Commissioners: None
ATTEST:
James Deptefano, S cretary
14