Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC 2004-34A. B. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2004-34 A RESOLUTION OF THE DIAMOND BAR PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 2004-26/MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2004-07 AND CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION 15301(e), A REQUEST TO REMODEL AND CONSTRUCT AN APPROXIMATE 942 SQUARE FEET SECOND STORY ADDITION TO AN EXISTING 2,280 GROSS SQUARE FEET ONE STORY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH A TWO CAR GARAGE AND COVERED PATIO. THE PROJECT SITE IS LOCATED AT 624 HOSS STREET (LOT 63, TRACT NO. 31139), DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA. RECITALS 1. The property owners, Stephen and Christina Goode, and applicant/agent ProBuilder - Kenn Coble, filed Development Review No. 2004-26/Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-07 applications for a property located at 624 Hoss Street (Lot 63, Tract No. 31139), Diamond Bar, Los Angeles County, California, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review/Minor Conditional Use Permit, and Categorical Exemption shall be referred to as the "Application." 2. On August 4, 2004, 110 property owners within the project's 500 -foot radius were mailed a public hearing notice and on August 6, 2004, three other locations within the application's vicinity were posted. On August 10, 2004, the project's public hearing notification was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers and a public hearing notice display board was posted at the site. 3. On August 24, 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted and concluded a duly noticed public hearing on the Application. RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. The Planning Commission hereby determines that the project identified above in this Resolution is categorically exempt per the 1970 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section 15301(a). 3. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds and determines that, having considered the record as a whole including the findings set forth below, and changes and alterations which have been incorporated into and conditioned upon the proposed project set forth in the Application, there is no evidence before this Planning Commission that the project proposed herein will have the potential of an adverse effect on wild life resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Based upon substantial evidence, this Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effects contained in Section 753.5 (d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth herein, this Planning Commission hereby finds as follows: (a) The project parcel is Lot 63, Tract 31139, APN 8717-019-022, and addressed 624 Hoss Street, Diamond Bar, California. The project site is approximately .17 gross acres, 7,260 gross square feet and 5,445 usable square feet. It is a near rectangular shaped lot with an existing one story single-family residence. (b) The General Plan Land Use designation is Low Density Residential (RL), maximum 3 dwelling units per acre. The site is zoned Single - Family Residence, R-1-8,000. -� (c) The R-1-8,000 zone surrounds the site. (d) The Application is a request to remodel and construct an approximate 942 square feet second story addition to an existing 2,280 gross square feet one story single-family residence with a two car garage and covered patio. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (e) The design and layout of the proposed development are consistent with the General Pian, development standards of the applicable district, design guidelines, and architectural criteria for specialized area (e.g., theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards, or planned developments. The project site, currently developed with a legal nonconforming side setback one story, single-family residence, was established before the adoption of the City's General Plan and current Municipal Code. The adopted July 25, 1995, General Plan land use designation is Low Density Residential (RL) (maximum 3 dwelling units/per acre). The Application complies with the City's General Plan objectives and strategies related to maintaining the integrity of residential 2 neighborhoods and open space, the current Diamond Bar Municipal Code, and with the City's Design Guidelines. There is no specific plan. The proposed project conforms to applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, the site coverage is less than 40 percent, is comparable with the existing neighborhood, it meets the required height limitations, and it does not encroach into the setbacks further than the existing structure. The proposed project is a one and two story home. The properties to the east are higher than the subject property. The other neighboring parcels are basically at the same elevation. The approximate height of the two story addition is 25 feet and in accordance with Municipal Code height standards, therefore, the proposed remodel is not considered an impact to the surrounding properties' view corridor. (f) The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future development, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. Hoss Street and Great Bend Drive adequately serve the project site. These and the neighboring streets are designed to handle minimum traffic created by residential development. The project site is currently developed with a legal nonconforming one story single-family residence. The proposed reconstruction/ remodeling does not change the existing single-family use. Although the proposed second story addition enlarges the existing residence, it meets the 35 feet height limitation per the Municipal Code. Additionally, the Application has a style consistent with surrounding properties. The structure is not expected to unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future development with regard to view or traffic. (g) The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the characteristics of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain and enhance the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22.48, the General Plan, City Design Guidelines, or any applicable specific plan. The proposed single-family residence's contemporary architectural style is maintained. The project's architectural styling retains the dual front door alcove entry, and duplicates the window style, wood trim fascia; siding and stucco. 9 Although Exhibit "A" indicates removing the existing rock at the garage and replacing it with plain stucco, a condition requires the streetscape garage elevation be layered with materials and finishes to blend with the new addition and to revamp the streetscape garage elevation and submit it to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to Permit Issuance. A staff suggestion is to add brick, siding, or a similar material half way up from the ground. This revision and the multi-levels of roof lines, the other wood siding, and stucco, create the texture and contrast consistent with the existing neighborhood, while providing variety and low levels of maintenance. The project's colors and materials are maintained with the existing architectural style and palette which makes the application compatible with the other homes within the tract. The Application design is consistent with the General Plan, City's Design Guidelines and Municipal Code. There is no specific plan. (h) The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public, as well as its neighbors, through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, and color that will remain aesthetically appealing. The colors, materials, and textures proposed are the same as existing and are complimentary to the existing homes within the area while offering variety and low maintenance levels. (i) The proposed project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious (e.g., negative affect on property values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Structural plan check, City permits, and inspections; soils report and Fire Department approvals, are required for construction. These processes will ensure that the finished project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Additionally, a Recorded Covenant and Agreement is required and runs with the land to maintain a single-family residence. (j) The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The City has determined that the proposed project is categorically exempt per the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA), Section 15301(e). 4 NONCONFROMING STRUCTURES (k) The addition, enlargement, extension, reconstruction, relocation or structural alteration of the nonconforming structure would not result in the structure becoming incompatible with other structures in the neighborhood. As stated in Item (g), the proposed project is compatible with other structures in the vicinity. Many one and two-story structures in the vicinity have remodeled and added the increased square footage. (1) The addition, enlargement, extension, reconstruction, relocation or structural alteration of the nonconforming structure would not result in the structure becoming inconsistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan. As stated in Items (e) and (g), the proposed project is consistent with the City's General Plan objectives and strategies, Chapter 22.48 of the Municipal Code, and City Design Guidelines. (m) The addition, enlargement, extension, reconstruction, relocation or structural alteration of the nonconforming structure would not result in the structure becoming a restriction to the eventualIfuture compliance with the applicable regulations of the Municipal Code. The existing parcel was approved by Tract Map No. 31139, Lot 63, as .17 acres. The existing structure was completed under the Los Angeles County Code in 1973 and met the required setbacks of that Code prior to the City's incorporation. The distance between structures on adjoining parcels and the setback on the sides have changed from the Los Angeles County Code of 10 feet to 15 and 5 feet to 5 feet and 10 feet respectively. The application with an existing approximately 10 and 13 feet distance between structures at the northerly and southerly property line as well as the side setback on the southerly side are considered legal nonconforming. These are defined as any parcel or structure that was legally created or constructed prior to the adoption of the current Diamond Bar Municipal Code adopted November 3, 1998, and which does not conform to current Code provisions/standards prescribed for the zoning district in which the use is located. The proposed project conforms to the other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code and the exterior limits of the new construction do not exceed the applicable height limit or encroach further into the setbacks than the comparable portions of the existing structure where the nonconformity exists. No further nonconforming status of this parcel is anticipated. L� (n) The addition, enlargement, extension, reconstruction, relocation or structural alteration of the nonconforming structure would not result in the structure becoming detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of persons residing in the neighborhood. Structural plan check, City permits, and inspections; soils report and Fire Department approvals, are required for construction. These processes will ensure that the finished project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Additionally, a Recorded Covenant and Agreement is required and runs with the land to maintain a single-family residence. (o) The addition, enlargement, extension, reconstruction, relocation or structural alteration of the nonconforming structure would not result in the structure becoming detrimental and/or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood. As stated in Items (e -h), the architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood's characteristics of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22.48, the General Plan, City Design Guidelines, or any applicable specific plan. Also, as stated in item (i),structural plan check, City permits, and inspections; soils report and Fire Department approvals, are required for construction. These processes will ensure that the finished project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (p) The proposed use is allowed within the subject -zoning district with the approval of a Minor Conditional Use Permit and complies with all other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. As state in Items (e -o), the proposed use is allowed within the zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. (q) The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan. - As state in Item (e), the proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any there is not applicable specific plan. 2 (r) The design, location, size and operating characteristics of the proposed use are compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity. As stated in Items (e -o), the design, location, size, etc. is compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity. (s) The subject site is physically suitable forthe type and density/intensity of use being proposed including access, provisions of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and the absence of physical constraints. As stated in Items (e -q), the subject site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of use being proposed including access, provisions of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and the absence of physical constraints. (t) Granting the Minor Conditional Use Permit will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to person, property or improvements in the vicinity and zoning districts in which the property is located. Structural plan check, City permits, and inspections, soils report and Fire Department approvals, are required for construction. These processes will ensure that the finished project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Additionally, a Recorded Covenant and Agreement is required and runs with the land to maintain a single-family residence. The second story addition follows the line of the existing one story structure and maintains a 35 feet height, therefore, the proposed application has no negative effect or impact to the surrounding properties' view corridor. Additionally, the colors and materials utilized are compatible with the homes within the surrounding area. (u) The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The City has determined that the proposed project is categorically exempt perthe California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA), Section 15301(e). 7 5. Based upon the findings and conclusion set forth above, the Planning Commission hereby approves this Application subject to the following conditions: (a) The project shall substantially conform to site plan, floor plans, roof plan, and elevations collectively labeled as Exhibit "A" dated August 24, 2004, as submitted to, amended herein, and approved by the Planning Commission. (b) The subject site shall be maintained in a condition that is free of debris both during and after the construction, addition, or implementation of the entitlement granted herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether during or subsequent to construction, shall be done only by the property owner, applicant or by duly permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste from residential, commercial, construction, and industrial areas within the City. It shall be the applicant's obligation to insure that the waste contractor utilized has obtained permits from the City of Diamond Bar to provide such services. PUBLIC WORKS (c) The drainage pattern shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Division; surface water shall drain away from the building at a 2% minimum slope. Flow shall not run onto the sidewalk, and an Encroachment Permit may be required for a subdrain system to direct the runoff into the gutter via a curb drain. (d) If applicable, the applicant shall comply with Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan requirements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. (e) Owners shall obtain an encroachment permit for the existing wall in the public right-of-way from the Public Works Division prior to the issuance of any permits. BUILDING AND SAFETY (f) The applicant shall provide temporary sanitation facilities while under construction. (g) The single-family structure shall meet the 2001 California Building Code, California Plumbing Code, Califomia Mechanical Code, and the - 2001 National Electrical Code requirements. N. PLANNING (h) This single-family structure shall meet the State Energy Conservation Standards. (i) The minimum design wind pressure shall be 80 miles per hour and "C" exposure. {j) Smoke detectors shall be provided in all sleeping rooms. (k) Prior to plan check submittal, the applicant shall submit a soils report as required by the City for the proposed improvements to be reviewed and approved. (1) The applicant shall comply with the requirements of City Planning, Building and Safety, Public Works Divisions, and the Fire Department. (m) Footing shall be designed for expansive soil. (n) Lateral analysis shall be performed of the existing first story. (o) Prior to plan check submittal, the applicant shall indicate color and type (weight) of roofing materials on the plans. (p) The second story addition stairway shall meet maximum raise and minimum run. (q) The single-family structure requires Fire Department approval and is located in "High Fire Zone" and shall meet the following requirements of that fire zone: (1) All roof covering shall be "Fire Retardant, Class A"; the roofs shall be fire stopped at the eaves to preclude entry of the flame or members under the fire; (2) All enclosed under -floor areas shall be constructed as exterior walls; (3) All openings into the attic, floor, and/or other enclosed areas shall be covered with corrosion -resistant wire mesh not less than 1/4 inch nor more than 1/2 inch in any dimension except where such openings are equipped with sash or door; (4) Chimneys shall have spark arresters of maximum 1/2 inch screen. (r) Applicants shall revise Exhibit "A" which indicates removing the stone and replacing it with plain stucco at the streetscape garage elevation with a layered material and finish to blend with the new addition. Staff suggests adding brick, siding, or a similar material half way up from 9 the ground. This plan shall be submitted to the Planning Division for ... ..... __ review and approval prior to final plan check and permit issuance. (s) A landscape/irrigation plan for the front yard shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to building permit issuance. The plan shall delineate the type of planting materials, color, size, quantity and location. The landscaping/ irrigation shall be installed or replaced in the front yard prior to the Planning Division's final inspection. Any walls, gates, fountains, dense plant material, etc. that may be proposed within the front setback shall not exceed a maximum height of 42 inches. (t) The Owner shall obtain a Zoning Clearance for any Home Based Business use per Municipal Code Section 22.42.070 in the proposed office. (u) The single-family residence shall not be utilized in a manner that creates adverse effects upon the neighborhood and environmental setting of the residential site to levels of dust, glare/light, noise, odor, traffic, or other disturbances to the existing residential neighborhood and shall not result in significantly adverse effects on public services and resources. The single-family residence shall not be used for commerciaVinstitutlonal purposes, or otherwise used as a separate dwelling. The property shall not be used for regular gatherings which result in a nuisance or which create traffic and parking problems in the neighborhood. (v) The owners shall complete and record a "Covenant and Agreement to Maintain a Single-family Residence" on a form to be provided by the City. The covenant must be completed and recorded with the Los Angeles County's Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of a building permit. (w) This grant is valid for two, (2) years and shall be exercised (i.e., construction) within that period or this grant shall expire. A one - (1) year extension may be approved when submitted to the City in writing at least 60 days prior to the expiration date. The Deputy City Manager will consider the extension request at a duly noticed public hearing in accordance with Chapter 22.72 of the City of Diamond Bar Municipal Code. (x) This grant shall not be effective for any purpose until the permittee and owners of the property involved (if other than the permittee) have filed, within fifteen (15) days of approval of this grant, at the City of — Diamond Bar Community and Development Services Department, their affidavit stating that they are aware and agree to accept all the 10 conditions of this grant. Further, this grant shall not be effective until the permittee pays remaining City processing fees. (y) If the Department of Fish and Game determines that Fish and Game Code Section 711.4 applies to the approval of this project, then the applicant shall remit to the City, within five days of this grant's approval, a cashier's check of $25.00 for a documentary handling fee in connection with Fish and Game Code requirements. Furthermore, if this project is not exempt from a filing fee imposed because the project has more than a deminimis impact on fish and wildlife, the applicant shall also pay to the Department of Fish and Game any such fee and any fine which the Department determines to be owed. The Planning Commission shall: (a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and (b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail to Stephen and Christina Goode, 624 Hoss Street, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 and Pro Builder, Kenn Coble, 449 W. Allen Avenue, #109, San Dimas, CA 81773. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24th DAY OF COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. i By: Jack Tanaka, Vice Chairman AUGUST 2004, BY THE PLANNING I, James DeStefano, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of August 2004, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners NOES: Commissioner: ABSENT: Commissioner: ABSTAIN: Conipissioner4 ATTEST: Tye, Low, McManus, V/C Tanaka C/Nolan Secretary 11 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2004- A RESOLUTION OF THE DIAMOND BAR PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 2004- 26/MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2004-07 AND CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION 15301(e), A REQUEST TO REMODEL AND CONSTRUCT AN APPROXIMATE 942 SQUARE FEET SECOND STORY ADDITION TO AN EXISTING 2,280 GROSS SQUARE FEET ONE STORY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH A TWO CAR GARAGE AND COVERED PATIO. THE PROJECT SITE IS LOCATED AT 624 ROSS STREET (LOT 63, TRACT NO. 31139), DIAMOND BAR, A. RECITALS 1. The property owners, Stephen and Christina Goode, and applicant/agent ProBuilder - Kenn Coble, filed Development Review No. 2004-26/Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-07 applications for a property located at 624 Hoss Street (Lot 63, Tract No. 31139), Diamond Bar, Los Angeles County, California, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review/Minor Conditional Use Permit, and Categorical Exemption shall be referred to as the "Application." 2. On August 4, 2004, 110 property owners within the project's 500 -foot radius were mailed a public hearing notice and on August 6, 2004, three other locations within the application's vicinity were posted. On August 10, 2004, the project's public hearing notification was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers and a public hearing notice display board was posted at the site. 3. On August 24, 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted and concluded a duly noticed public hearing on the Application. B. RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: 1. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. The Planning Commission hereby determines that the project identified above in this Resolution is categorically exempt per the 1970 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section 15301(e). 3. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds and determines that, having considered the record as a whole including the findings set forth below, and changes and alterations which have been incorporated into and conditioned upon the proposed project set forth in the Application, there is no evidence before this Planning Commission that the project proposed herein will have the potential of an adverse effect on wild life resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Based upon substantial evidence, this Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effects contained in Section 753.5 (d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth herein, this Planning Commission hereby finds as follows: (a) The project parcel is Lot 63, Tract 31139, APN 8717-019-022, and addressed 624 Hoss Street, Diamond Bar, California. The project site is approximately .17 gross acres, 7,260 gross square feet and 5,445 usable square feet. It is a near rectangular shaped lot with an existing one story single-family residence. (b) The General Plan Land Use designation is Low Density Residential (RL), maximum 3 dwelling units per acre. The site is zoned SingleFamily Residence, R-1-8,000. (c) The R-1-8,000 zone surrounds the site. (d) The Application is a request to remodel and construct an approximate 942 square feet second story addition to an existing 2,280 gross square feet one story single-family residence with a two car garage and covered patio. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (e) The design and layout of the proposed development are consistent with the General Plan, development standards of the applicable district, design guidelines, and architectural criteria for specialized area (e.g., theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards, or planned developments. The project site, currently developed with a legal nonconforming side setback one story, single-family residence, was established before the adoption of the City's General Plan and current Municipal Code. The adopted July 25, 1995, General Plan land use designation is Low Density Residential (RL) (maximum 3 dwelling units/per acre). The Application complies neighborhoods and open space, the current Diamond Bar Municipal Code, and with the City's Design Guidelines. There is no specific plan. The proposed project conforms to applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, the site coverage is less than 40 percent, is comparable with the existing neighborhood, it meets the required height limitations, and it does not encroach into the setbacks further than the existing structure. The proposed project is a one and two story home. The properties to the east are higher than the subject property. The other neighboring parcels are basically at the same elevation. The approximate height of the two story addition is 25 feet and in accordance with Municipal Code height standards; therefore, the proposed remodel is not considered an impact to the surrounding properties' view corridor. The design and layout of the (f proposed development will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future development, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. Hoss Street and Great Bend Drive adequately serve the project site. These and the neighboring streets are designed to handle minimum traffic created by residential development The project site is currently developed with a legal nonconforming one story single-family residence. The proposed reconstruction/ remodeling does not change the existing single-family use. Although the proposed second story addition enlarges the existing residence, it meets the 35 feet height limitation per the Municipal Code. Additionally, the Application has a style consistent with surrounding properties. The structure is not expected to unreasonably interfere with The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the characteristics of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain and enhance the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22.48, the General Plan, City Design Guidelines, or any applicable specific plan. The proposed single-family residence's contemporary architectural style is maintained. The project's architectural styling retains the dual front door alcove entry, and duplicates the window style, wood trim fascia, siding and stucco. Although Exhibit "A" indicates removing the existing rock at the garage and replacing it with plain stucco, a condition requires the streetscape garage elevation be layered with materials and finishes to blend with the new addition and to revamp the streetscape garage elevation and submit it to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to Permit Issuance. A staff suggestion is to add brick, siding, or a similar material half way up from the ground. This revision and the multi-levels of roof lines, the other wood siding, and stucco, create the texture and contrast consistent with the existing neighborhood, while providing variety and low levels of maintenance. The project's colors and materials are maintained with the existing architectural style and palette which makes the application compatible with the other homes within the tract. The Application design is consistent with the General Plan, City's Design Guidelines and Municipal Code. There is no specific plan. (h) The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public, as well as its neighbors, through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, and color that will remain aesthetically appealing. The colors, materials, and textures proposed are the same as existing and are complimentary to the existing homes within the area while offering variety and low maintenance levels. (i) The proposed project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious (e.g., negative affect on property values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Structural plan check, City permits, and inspections; soils report and Fire Department approvals, are required for construction. These processes will ensure that the finished project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Additionally, a Recorded (j) The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The City has determined that the proposed project is categorically exempt per the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA), Section 15301(e). NONCONFROMING STRUCTURES (k) The addition, enlargement, extension, reconstruction, relocation or structural alteration of the nonconforming structure would not result in the structure becoming incompatible with other structures in the neighborhood. As stated in Item (g), the proposed project is compatible with other structures in the vicinity. Many one and two-story structures in the vicinity have remodeled and added the increased square footage. The addition, enlargement, extension, reconstruction, relocation or structural alteration of the nonconforming structure would not result in the structure becoming inconsistent with the General Plan or any applicable As stated in Items (e) and (g), the proposed project is consistent with the City's General Plan objectives and strategies, Chapter 22.48 of the Municipal Code, and City Design Guidelines. (m The addition, enlargement, extension, reconstruction, relocation or structural alteration of the nonconforming structure would not result in the structure becoming a restriction to the eventuallfuture compliance with the applicable regulations of the Municipal Code. The existing parcel was approved by Tract Map No. 31139, Lot 63, as .17 acres. The existing structure was completed under the Los Angeles County Code in 1973 and met the required setbacks of that Code prior to the City's incorporation. The distance between structures on adjoining parcels and the setback on the sides have changed from the Los Angeles County Code of 10 feet to 15 and 5 feet to 5 feet and 10 feet respectively. The application with an existing approximately 10 and 13 feet distance between structures at the northerly and southerly property line as well as the side setback on the southerly side are considered legal nonconforming. These are defined as any parcel or structure that was legally created or constructed prior to the adoption of the current Diamond Bar Municipal Code adopted November 3, 1998, and which does not The proposed project conforms to the other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code and the exterior limits of the new construction do not exceed the applicable height limit or encroach further into the setbacks than the comparable portions of the existing structure where the nonconformity exists. No further nonconforming status of this parcel is (n) The addition, enlargement, extension, reconstruction, relocation or structural alteration of the nonconforming structure would not result in the structure becoming detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of persons residing in the neighborhood. Structural plan check, City permits, and inspections; soils report and Fire Department approvals, are required for construction. These processes will ensure that the finished project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Additionally, a Recorded Covenant and Agreement is required and runs with the land to maintain a single-family residence. (o) The addition, enlargement, extension, reconstruction, relocation or structural alteration of the nonconforming structure would not result in the structure becoming detrimental and/or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood. As stated in Items (e -h), the architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood's characteristics of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22.48, the General Plan, City Design Guidelines, or any applicable specific plan. Also, as stated in Item (i),structural plan check, City permits, and inspections, soils report and Fire Department approvals, are required for construction. These processes will ensure that the finished project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The proposed use is allowed within the subject -zoning district with the approval of a Minor Conditional Use Permit and complies with all other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. As state in Items (e -o), the proposed use is allowed within the zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. (a The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan. As state in Item (e), the proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any there is not applicable specific plan. (r) The design, location, size and operating characteristics of the proposed use are compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity. As stated in Items (e -o), the design, location, size, etc. is compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity. (s) The subject site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of use being proposed including access, provisions of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and the absence of physical constraints. As stated in Items (e -o), the subject site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of use being proposed including access, provisions of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and the absence of physical constraints. (t) Granting the Minor Conditional Use Permit will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to person, property or improvements in the vicinity and zoning districts in which the property is located. Structural plan check, City permits, and inspections, soils report and Fire Department approvals, are required for construction. These processes will ensure that the finished project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Additionally, a Recorded Covenant and Agreement is required and runs with the land to The second story addition follows the line of the existing one story structure and maintains a 35 feet height; therefore, the proposed application has no negative effect or impact to the surrounding properties' view corridor. Additionally, the colors and materials utilized are compatible with the homes within the surrounding area. (u) The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The City has determined that the proposed project is categorically exempt perthe California Environmental QualityAct of 1970 (CEQA), Section 15301(e). 5. Based upon the findings and conclusion set forth above, the Planning Commission hereby approves this Application subject to the following conditions: PUBLIC (a) The project shall substantially conform to site plan, floor plans, roof plan, and elevations collectively labeled as Exhibit "A" dated August 24, 2004, as submitted to, amended herein, and approved by the Planning Commission. (b) The subject site shall be maintained in a condition that is free of debris both during and after the constriction, addition, or implementation of the entitlement granted herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether during or subsequent to constriction, shall be done only by the property owner, applicant or by duly permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste from residential, commercial, constriction, and industrial areas within the City. It shall be the applicant's obligation to insure that the waste contractor utilized has obtained permits from the City of Diamond Bar to provide such services. (c) The drainage pattern shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Division; surface water shall drain away from the building at a 2% minimum slope. Flow shall not am onto the sidewalk, and an Encroachment Permit may be required for a subdrain system to direct the runoff into the gutter via a curb drain. (d) If applicable, the applicant shall comply with Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan requirements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. (e) Owners shall obtain an encroachment permit for the existing wall in the public right-of-way from the Public Works Division prior to the issuance of any permits. BUILDING AND SAFETY ( f The applicant shall provide temporary sanitation facilities while under construction. The single-family stricture shall meet the 2001 California Building Code, California Plumbing Code, California Mechanical Code, and the 2001 National Electrical Code requirements. PLANNIN (h) This single-family structure shall meet the State Energy Conservation Standards. (i The minimum design wind pressure shall be 80 miles per hour and "C" exposure. Smoke detectors shall be provided in all sleeping Prior to plan check submittal, the applicant shall submit a soils report as required by the City for the proposed improvements to be reviewed and approved. (I The applicant shall comply with the requirements of City Planning, Building and Safety, Public Works Divisions, and the Fire Department. (m) Footing shall be designed for expansive soil. (n) Lateral analysis shall be performed of the existing first story. (o) Prior to plan check submittal, the applicant shall indicate color and type (p) The second story addition stairway shall meet maximum raise and minimum run. The single-family structure requires Fire Department approval and is located in "High Fire Zone" and shall meet the following requirements of that fire zone: (1) All roof covering shall be "Fire Retardant, Class A"; the roofs shall be fire stopped at the eaves to preclude entry of the flame or members under the fire; (2) All enclosed under -floor areas shall be constructed as exterior walls; (3) All openings into the attic, floor, and/or other enclosed areas shall be covered with corrosion -resistant wire mesh not less than 1/4 inch nor more than 1/z inch in any dimension except where such openings are equipped with sash or door; (4) Chimneys shall have spark arresters of maximum lh inch screen. (r) Applicants shall revise Exhibit "A" which indicates removing the stone and replacing it with plain stucco at the streetscape garage elevation with a layered material and finish to blend with the new addition. Staff suggests adding brick, siding, or a similar material half way up from the ground. This plan shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to final plan check and permit issuance. (s) A landscape/irrigation plan for the front yard shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to building permit issuance. The plan shall delineate the type of planting materials, color, size, quantity and location. The landscaping/ irrigation shall be installed or replaced in the front yard prior to the Planning Division's final inspection. Any walls, gates, fountains, dense plant material, etc. that may be proposed within the front setback shall not exceed a maximum height of 42 inches. (t) The Owner shall obtain a Zoning Clearance for any Home Based Business use per Municipal Code Section 22.42.070 in the proposed office. (u) The single-family residence shall not be utilized in a manner that creates adverse effects upon the neighborhood and environmental setting of the residential site to levels of dust, glare/light, noise, odor, traffic, or other disturbances to the existing residential neighborhood and shall not result in significantly adverse effects on public services and resources. The single-family residence shall not be used for commercial/institutional purposes, or otherwise used as a separate dwelling. The property shall not be used for regular gatherings which result in a nuisance or which create traffic and parking problems in the neighborhood. (v) The owners shall complete and record a "Covenant and Agreement to Maintain a Single-family Residence" on a form to be provided by the City. The covenant must be completed and recorded with the Los Angeles County's Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of a building permit. ( w This grant is valid for two, (2) years and shall be exercised (i.e., construction) within that period or this grant shall expire. A one(1) year extension may be approved when submitted to the City in writing at least 60 days prior to the expiration date. The Deputy City Manager will consider the extension request at a duly noticed public hearing in accordance with Chapter 22.72 of the City of Diamond Bar Municipal Code. (x) This grant shall not be effective for any purpose until the permittee and owners of the property involved (if other than the permittee) have filed, within fifteen (15) days of approval of this grant, at the City of Diamond Bar Community and Development Services Department, their affidavit stating that they are aware and agree to accept all the 1 conditions of this grant. Further, this grant shall not be effective until the permittee pays remaining City processing fees. If the Department of Fish and Game determines that Fish and Game Code Section 711.4 applies to the approval of this project, then the applicant shall remit to the City, within five days of this grant's approval, a cashier's check of $25.00 for a documentary handling fee in connection with Fish and Game Code requirements. Furthermore, if this project is not exempt from a filing fee imposed because the project has more than a deminimis impact on fish and wildlife, the applicant shall also pay to the Department of Fish and Game any such fee and any fine which the Department determines to be owed. The Planning Commission shall: (a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and (b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail to Stephen and Christina Goode, 624 Hoss Street, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 and Pro Builder, Kenn Coble, 449 W. Allen Avenue, 4109, San Dimas, CA 81773. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24th DAY OF AUGUST 2004, BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. i By: C Jack Tanaka, Vice Chairman I, James DeStefano, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of August 2004, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners: Tye, Low, McManus, V/C Tanaka NOES: ABSENT ATTEST Commissioner: Commissioner: C/Nolan 1