HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC 2001-24PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-24
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW 2001-04(1), MINOR VARIANCE NO. 2001-09(1),
AND CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION 15301(a), A REQUEST
FOR A REVISION OF HOURS OF OPERATION FOR A
RESTAURANT IN AN EXISTING SHOPPING CENTER. THE
PROJECT SITE IS 2020 BREA CANYON ROAD, SUITE A-7,
DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA.
A. RECITALS
1. The property owner, Nathaniel Williams, and applicant, Akbar Ali, have filed
an Application for Development Review No. 2001-04(1) and Minor Variance
No. 2001-09(1) for a property located at 2020 Brea Canyon Road, Suite A-7,
Diamond Bar, Los Angeles County, California, as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review
Revision, Minor Variance Revision and Categorical Exemption shall be
referred to as the "Revised Application."
2. On June 12, 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on Development Review
No. 2001-04, Minor Variance No. 2001-09, and Categorical Exemption, and
approved such per Planning Commission Resolution No. 2001-18.
3. On June 26, 2001, 35 property owners within a 700 -foot radius of the project
site were notified by mail. On June 29, 2001, notification of the public
hearing for this project was provided in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and
Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers and a notice of public hearing on a
display board was posted at the site and displayed for at least 10 days
before the public hearing. Three other public places were posted within the
vicinity of the Revised Application.
4. On July 10, 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar
conducted, and concluded a duly noticed public hearing on the Revised
Application.
B. RESOLUTION
NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning
- Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows:
�. -..' 1. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
1
F--- T-7
I�;Pilili�it
2. The Planning Commission hereby determines that the project identified
above in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA) and guidelines
promulgated thereunder. This is pursuant to Section 15301(a) of Article 19
of Chapter 3, Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
3. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds and determines that,
having considered the record as a whole including the findings set forth
below. and changes and alterations which have been incorporated into and
conditioned upon tho approved project set forth in the Revised Application,
there is no evidence before this Planning Commission that the project
proposed herein will have the potential of an adverse effect on wild life
resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Based upon
substantial evidence, this Planning C: •--:;s '^^ hereby rebuts the
presumption of adverse effects contained S:: 753.51 (d) of Title 14 of
the California Code of Regulations.
4. Based upon the ".•:;I ; and conclusions set forth herein, this Planning
Commission, here;;; as follows:
(a) The revised application relates to a previously approved Development
Review No. 2001-04 and Minor Variance No. 2001-09. This approval
pp � .:..
was for an intensification of use and parking variance for a restaurant f:
use in a retail suite at 2020 Brea Canyon, Road, Suite A-7 within an
existing commercial shopping center with, mixed uses of community
retail and service. The project site is 4.73 acres.
The previous approval per Planning Commission Resolution
No. 2001-18 included the hours of operation for restaurant use as
5:30 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. daily.
(b) The General Plan Land Use designation is Office Professional (OP).
The zoning designation for the project site is Community Commercial -
Planned Development— Billboard Exclusion (C -2 -PD -BE).
(c) Generally, the following zones surround the project site: to the north,
south and east are Open Space and SR -57; to the west is open space
and Commercial Plan Development (CPD) Zone.
(d) The Revised Application requests a revision of hours of operation for
the public from 11:30 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. on Saturday and Sunday.
Additionally, the Applicant requests to use the premises from
10:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, for food preparation
and the taking of reservations and catering orders.
E
h f '
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
4 (e) The design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with
the General Plan, development standards of the applicable district,
design guidelines, and architectural criteria for specialized area
(e.g., theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards, or
planned developments).
There is no change in the Revised Application to the design and
layout approved in Planning Commission Resolution No. 2001-18 for
the intensification of use by opening the restaurant for extended hours
on Saturday and Sunday. The design and layout of the approved
project is consistent with the applicable elements of the City's General
Plan and Design Guidelines.
(f) The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere
with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future
development, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards.
There is no change in the Revised Application to the design and
layout approved in Planning Commission Resolution No. 2001-18 for
the intensification of use by opening the restaurant for extended hours
on Saturday and Sunday. The design and layout of the approved
._u project does not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring
existing or future development, and will not create traffic or pedestrian
hazards.
(g) The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible
with the characteristics of the surrounding neighborhood and will
maintain the harmonious, orderly and attractive development
contemplated by Chapter 22.48, the General Plan, City Design
Guidelines, or any applicable specific plan.
There is no change in the Revised Application to the architectural
design and layout approved in Planning Commission Resolution
No. 2001-18 for the intensification of use by opening the restaurant for
extended hours on Saturday and Sunday. The design and layout of
the approved project is compatible with the characteristics of the
surrounding neighborhood and will maintain the harmonious, orderly
and attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22.48, the
General Plan, City Design Guidelines, or any applicable specific plan.
— (h) The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable
environment for its occupants and visiting public, as well as its
_ neighbors, through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, and color
that will remain aesthetically appealing.
9
_. .
I;�kf1�M
There is no change in the Revised Application to the design and I l"
layout approved in Planning Commission Resolution No. 2001-18 fori°J"'
the intensification of use of the existing retail suite. However, the
Development Review and Minor Variance approved a decrease in the
number of required off-street parking spaces for the restaurant use in
the shopping center with hours of operation for the restaurant from
5:30 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. daily due to the parking spaces provided on
site of existing businesses on site.
The Revised Application requests additional operating hours from
11:30 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. 'on Saturday, and Sunday, and to use the
premises from 10:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., ,Monday, through Friday, for
food preparation and the taking of reservations and catering orders.
A parking analysis ir;dicatos that in addition to the 20 spaces required
for the restaurant uso. there arc an l additional 19 spaces available on
site for Saturday and Sunday sri;ce many of the existing businesses
are closed from Saturday noon to Oonday morning. Therefore, the
design and layout of the approved project will provide a desirable
environment for its occupants and visiting public, as well as its
neighbors, through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, and color
that 'will remain aesthetically appealing.,
The proposed project will :,not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, or welfare or materially! injurious (e.g., negative affect on
property values or resalp(s) of property) to the properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
There is no change in the Revised Application to the design and
layout approved in Planning Commission Resolution No. 2001-18 for
the intensification of use of the existing retail suite. However, the
Development Review and Minor Variance approved a decrease in the
number of required;off street parking spaces for the restaurant use in
the shopping center with flours of operation for the restaurant from
5:30 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. daily due to the parking spaces provided on
site of existing businesses on site.
The Revised Application requests additional operating hours from
11:30 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. on Saturday and Sunday, and to use the
premises from 10: p0 a.m. to 5:30 p. m., Monday through Friday, for
food preparation and the taking of reservations and catering orders.
A parking analysis indicates that in addition to the 20 spaces required
for the restaurant use, there are an additional 19 spaces available on
site for Saturday an'd Sunday since many of the existing businesses
are closed from Saturday noon to Monday morning. OX-11�
F The approved project will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, or welfare or materially injurious (e.g., negative affect on
P property values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
(j) The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
The environmental evaluation shows that the approved project is
Categorically Exempt pursuant to the guidelines of the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA), Section 15301(a).
MINOR VARIANCE
(k) There are special circumstances applicable to the property
(e.g., location, shape, size, surroundings, topography, or other
conditions), so that the strict application of this Development Code
denies the property owner privileges enjoyed by other property
owners in the vicinity and under identical zoning districts or creates an
unnecessary and non -self created, hardship or unreasonable
regulation which make it obviously impractical to require compliance
�_- with the development standards.
i
Minor Variance No. 2001-09 was approved for a decrease in the
number of required off-street parking spaces for the restaurant use in
the shopping center with hours of operation for the restaurant from
5:30 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. daily in order to allow the existing businesses
on site adequate parking.
The Revised Application requests additional operating hours from
11:30 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. on Saturday and Sunday, and to use the
premises from 10:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, for
food preparation and the taking of reservations and catering orders.
Many businesses in the shopping center are closed from 12:00 p.m.
Saturday to Monday morning. Therefore, a revision to the
intensification of use and the Minor Variance is supported, and strict
adherence to the regulation would create an unnecessary and non -
self -created, hardship or unreasonable regulation that make it
obviously impractical to require compliance with the development
standards.
(1) Granting the Minor Variance is necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other property
..y owners in the same vicinity, zoning district, and denied to the property
owner for which the Minor Variance is sought.
5
Minor Variance No. 2001-09 was approved for a decrease in the
number of required off-street parking spaces for the restaurant use in
the shopping center with hours of operation for the restaurant from
5:30 p.m. to 10:0,0 p.m. daily in order to allow the existing businesses
on site adequate parking.
The Revised Application requests additional operating hours from
11:30 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. on Saturday and Sunday, and to use the
premises from 10:00 a.m. to 5:30 p,m., Monday through Friday, for
food preparation and the taking of reservations and catering orders.
A parking analysis indicates that in addition to the 20 spaces required
for the restaurant use, there are an additional 19 spaces available on
site for Saturday and Sunday since many of the existing businesses
are closed from Saturday noon to Monday morning. Therefore, a
revision to the Development Review and the Minor Variance is
necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property
rights possessed by other property owners in the same vicinity, zoning
district, and denied, to the property owner for which the Minor
Variance is sought.
(m) Granting the Minor Variance is consistent with the General Plan and ^,
any applicable specific plan.
Granting the Minor Variance is consistent with the Development Code
standards. As stated in Item (e), the approved project and Revised
Application are consistent with the General Plan. Therefore, granting
the Minor Variance is consistent with the General Plan and any
applicable specific plan.
(n) The proposed, entitlement would not be detrimental to the public
interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City.
There is no change in the Revised Application to the design and
layout approved in Planning Commission Resolution No. 2001-18 for
the intensification of use of the existing retail suite. However, the
Development Review and Minor Variance approved a decrease in the
number of required off-street parking spaces for the restaurant use in
the shopping center with hours of operation for the restaurant from
5:30 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. daily due to the parking spaces provided on
site of existing businesses on site.
0
.1..`.., r,a? i. hUlk_ 441 fel"'V'w pj� t k 3&
The Revised Application requests additional operating hours from
11:30 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. on Saturday and Sunday, and to use the
premises from 10:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, for
food preparation and the taking of reservations and catering orders.
A parking analysis indicates that in addition to the 20 spaces required
for the restaurant use, there are an additional 19 spaces available on
site for Saturday and Sunday since many of the existing businesses
are closed from Saturday noon to Monday morning. Therefore, the
Revised Application would not be detrimental to the public interest,
health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City.
(o) The proposed entitlement has been reviewed in compliance with the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
The environmental evaluation shows that the proposed project is
Categorically Exempt pursuant to the guidelines of the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA), Section 15301(a).
5. Based upon the findings and conclusion set forth above, the Planning
Commission hereby approves this Revised Application subject to the
following conditions:
(a) Condition 5(m) of Planning Commission Resolution No. 2001-18 shall
be revised as follows: Restaurant hours open to the public shall be
between 5:30 p.m. and 10:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 11:30
a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Saturday and Sunday.
(b) Planning Commission Resolution No. 2001-18, approved June 12,
2001, shall remain in full force and effect except as amended herein.
The Planning Commission shall:
(a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and
(b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail,
to Nathaniel Williams, 3029 Wilshire Blvd. #202, Santa Monica, CA
90703, and Akbar Ali, 8481 Holder Street, Buena Park, CA 90620.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS THE 10t" DAY OF JULY, 2001, BY THE
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR.
-T
Bob Zirbes, Chairman
7
I I I I -,�._�._1-„-,�. . II I I 11N II , i i! II i
I, James DeStefano, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted, at a regular meeting of the Planning Y'
Commission held on the 10th day of July, 2001, by the following vote:
AYES: V/C Ruziaka, Nelson, Kuo, Tye, Chair/Zirbes
NOES:
ABSENT:
AB)aes:
ATTEST:
DeStefGno, Secretary
i
' .-" ...,-1. — . .q�. I _. cI.11.. ..,, I i ._..,,_ r, 1.I —I ,..... _- .i.n.c, -"T-: rm.. x,; d...._..0 t"g"`Fd=;.d
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-24
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 2001-04(I), MINOR VARIANCE
NO. 2001-09(I), AND CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION
15301(a), A REQUEST FOR A REVISION OF HOURS OF
OPERATION FOR A RESTAURANT IN AN EXISTING
SHOPPING CENTER. THE PROJECT SITE IS 2020 BREA
A. RECITALS
1 The property owner, Nathaniel Williams, and applicant, Akbar Ali, have filed an
Application for Development Review No. 2001-04(I) and Minor Variance
No. 2001-09(I) for a property located at 2020 Brea Canyon Road, Suite A-
7, Diamond Bar, Los Angeles County, California, as described in the title of
this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development
Review Revision, Minor Variance Revision and Categorical Exemption
shall be referred to as the 'Revised Application."
2. On June 12, 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on Development Review No. 2001-
04, Minor Variance No. 2001-09, and Categorical Exemption, and
3. On June 26, 2001, 35 property owners within a 700 -foot radius of the project
site were notified by mail. On June 29, 2001, notification of the public
hearing for this project was provided in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and
Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers and a notice of public hearing on a
display board was posted at the site and displayed for at least 10 days
before the public hearing. Three other public places were posted within the -
4. On July 10, 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar
conducted, and concluded a duly noticed public hearing on the Revised
B. RESOLUTION
NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows:
1 The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
-F7
2. The Planning Commission hereby determines that the project identified
above in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970
(CEQA) and guidelines promulgated thereunder. This is pursuant to
I The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds and determines that,
having considered the record as a whole including the findings set
forth below. and changes and alterations which have been
incorporated into and condifloned upon tho approved project set
forth in the Revised Application, there is no evidence before this
Planning Commission that the project proposed herein will have the
potential of an adverse effect on wild life resources or the habitat
upon which the wildlife depends. Based upon substantial evidence,
this Planning hereby rebuts the C S
presumption of adverse effects ontained - 753.5 (d) of Title 14 of the
California Code of Reaulations.
(a) The revised application relates to a previously approved
Development Review No. 2001-04 and Minor Variance No.
2001-09. This approval was for an intensification of use and
parking variance for a restaurant use in a retail suite at 2020
Brea Canyon Road, Suite A-7 within an existing commercial
The previous approval per Planning Commission Resolution
No. 2001-18 included the hours of operation for restaurant
(b) The General Plan Land Use designation is Office Professional
(OP). The zoning designation for,the project site is Community
(c) Generally, the following zones surround the project site: to the
north, south and east are Open Space and SR -57; to the west
(d) The Revised Application requests a revision of hours of
operation for the public from 11 -W a.m. to 10:00 p.m. on
Saturday and Sunday. Additionally, the Applicant requests to
use the premises from 10:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Monday
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
(e) The design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with
the General Plan, development standards of the applicable district,
design guidelines, and architectural criteria for specialized area
(e.g., theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards, or
There is no change in the Revised Application to the design
and layout approved in Planning Commission Resolution No.
2001-18 for the intensification of use by opening the restaurant
for extended hours on Saturday and Sunday. The design and
layout of the approved project is consistent with the applicable
(f) The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere
with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future
There is no change in the Revised Application to the design
and layout approved in Planning Commission Resolution No.
2001-18 for the intensification of use by opening the restaurant
for extended hours on Saturday and Sunday. The design and
layout of the approved project does not interfere with the use
and enjoyment ofneighboring existing or future development,
(g) The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible
with the characteristics of the surrounding neighborhood and will
maintain the harmonious, orderly and attractive development
contemplated by Chapter 22.48, the General Plan, City Design
There is no change in the Revised Application to the
architectural design and layout approved in Planning
Commission Resolution No. 2001-18 for the intensification of
use by opening the restaurant for extended hours on Saturday
and Sunday. The design and layout of the approved project is
compatible with the characteristics of the surrounding
neighborhood and will maintain the harmonious, orderly and
(h) The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable
environment for its occupants and visiting public, as well as its
neighbors, through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, and
There is no change in the Revised Application to the
design and layout approved in Planning Commission
Resolution No. 2001-18 for the intensification of use of the
existing retail suite. However, the Development Review
and Minor Variance approved a decrease in the number of
required off-street parking spaces for the restaurant use in
the shopping center with hours of operation for the
The Revised Application requests additional operating
hours from 11:30 a. m. to 10:00 p. m. on Saturday and
Sunday, and to use the premises from 10:00 a.m, to 5:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, for food preparation and the
taking of reservations and catering orders. A parking
analysis irldficatos that in addition to the 20 spaces
required for the restaurant uso. thore aro an additional 19
spaces available on site for Saturday and Sunday sinco
many of the existing businesses are closed fl'Or17
Saturday noon to Monday morning. Therefore, the design
and layout of the approved project will provide a desirable
environment for its occupants and visiting public, as well
as its neighbors, through good aesthetic use of materials,
texture, and color that will remain aestheticall appealing.
y The proposed project will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially
There is no change in the Revised Application to the design and
layout approved in Planning Commission Resolution No. 2001-18
for the intensification of use of the existing retail suite. However,
the Development Review and Minor Variance approved a decrease
in the number of required off-street parking spaces for the
restaurant use in the shopping center with hours of operation for
the restaurant from 5:30 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. daily due to the parking
spaces provided on site of existing busine8ses-on site.
I The Revised Application requests additional
operating hours from 11:30 a.m, to 10:00 p.m. on Saturday and
Sunday, and to use the premises from 10:P0 a.m, to 5:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, for food preparation and the taking of
reservations and catering orders. A parking analysis indicates that
in addition to the 20 spaces required for the restaurant use, there
are an additional 19 spaces available on site for Saturday and
Sunday since many of the existing businesses are closed from
ick,
MINOR
The approved project will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious (e.g., negative
affect on property values or resale(s) of property) to the
The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
The environmental evaluation shows that the approved project
is Categorically Exempt pursuant to the guidelines of the
(k) There are special circumstances applicable to the property (e.g.,
location, shape, size, surroundings, topography, or other
conditions), so that the strict application of this Development Code
denies the property owner privileges enjoyed by other property
owners in the vicinity and under identical zoning districts or creates
an unnecessary and non -self created, hardship or unreasonable
regulation which make it obviously impractical to require compliance
with the development standards.
Minor Variance No. 2001-09 was approved for a decrease in the
number of required off-street parking spaces for the restaurant
use in the shopping center with hours of operation for the
restaurant from 5:30 p. m. to 10:00 p. m. daily in order to alto w
The Revised Application requests additional operating hours
from 11:30 a.m, to 10:00 p.m. on Saturday and Sunday, and to
use the premises from 10:00 a.m, to 5:30 p.m., Monday through
Many businesses in the shopping center are closed from 12:00
p.m. Saturday to Monday morning. Therefore, a revision to the
intensification of use and the Minor Variance is supported, and
strict adherence to the regulation would create an unnecessary
and nonself-created, hardship or unreasonable regulation that
make it obviously impractical to require compliance with the
(1) Granting the Minor Variance is necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other
property owners in the same vicinity, zoning district, and denied to
Minor Variance No. 2001-09 was approved for a decrease in the
number of required off-street parking spaces for the restaurant
use in the shopping center with hours of operation for the
restaurant from 5:30 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. daily in order to allow
The Revised Application requests additional operating hours
from 11:30 a.m, to 10:00 p.m. on Saturday and Sunday, and to
use the premises from 10:00 a.m, to 5:30 p.m., Monday through
A parking analysis indicates that in addition to the 20 spaces
required for the restaurant use, there are an additional 19
spaces available on site for Saturday and Sunday since many
of the existing businesses are closed from Saturday noon to
Monday morning. Therefore, a revision to the Development
Review and the Minor Variance is necessary for the
preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights
possessed by other property owners in the same vicinity,
(m) Granting the Minor Variance is consistent with the General Plan
Granting the Minor Variance is consistent with the
Development Code standards. As stated in Item (e), the
approved project and Revised Application are consistent with
the General Plan. Therefore, granting the Minor Variance is
(n) The proposed r entitlement would not be detrimental to the public
There is no change in the Revised Application to the design
and layout approved in Planning Commission Resolution No.
2001-18 for the intensification of use of the existing retail suite.
However, the Development Review and Minor Variance
approved a decrease in the number of required off-street
parking spaces for the restaurant use in the shopping center
with hours of operation for the restaurant from 5:30 p.m. to
The Revised Application requests additional operating hours
from 11:30 a.m, to 10:00 p.m. on Saturday and Sunday, and to
use the premises from 10:00 a.m, to 5:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, for food preparation and the taking of
A parking analysis indicates that in addition to the 20
spaces required for the restaurant use, there are an
additional 19 spaces available on site for Saturday and
Sunday since many of the existing businesses are closed
from Saturday noon to Monday morning. Therefore, the
(o) The proposed entitlement has been reviewed in compliance with
The environmental evaluation shows that the proposed
project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to the guidelines
5. Based upon the findings and conclusion set forth above, the Planning
Commission hereby approves this Revised Application subject to the
(a) Condition 5(m) of Planning Commission Resolution No. 2001-18
shall be revised as follows: Restaurant hours open to the
public shall be between 5:30 p.m. and 10:00 p.m., Monday
(b) Planning Commission Resolution No. 2001-18, approved June
The Planning Commission
(a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution;
(b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified
mail, to Nathaniel Williams, 3029 Wilshire Blvd. #202, Santa
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS THE 10 th DAY OF JULY, 2001,
BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR.
R- Bob Zirbes, Chairman
1, James DeStefano, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted, at a regular
AYES: V/C Ruzicka, Nelson, Kuo, Tye,
NOES: ABSENT:
N ABSTAIN: ATTEST:
)e s DeStek-no),Secrel
a es DeStefF-no, Secretary