Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC 2000-22„�,.-_,•.�,.,,re�....-�.,.��-•.,=__raw,.��ibw�..�.iN'r,..xu,Nw�r.lb�lld„a,.wlaw'�- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2000-22 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 2000-19 AND CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, AN APPLICATION REQUEST TO REMODEL AND ADD APPROXIMATELY 4,607 SQUARE FEET AND DECK TO AN EXISTING 3,110 SQUARE FOOT, TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH A THREE CAR GARAGE LOCATED AT 23634 RIDGELIKE ROAD, (LOT 87 OF TRACT NO. 30091) DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA. - A. Recitals 1. The property owner, Sunil Kohli, has filed an application for Development Review No. 2000-19 for a property located at 23634 Ridgeline Road, Diamond Bar, Los Angeles County, California as described above in the title of this resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review and Categorical Exemption shall be referred to as the "Application". 2. Notification of the public hearing for this project has been made in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers on October 13, 2000. Thirty property owners within a 500 -foot radius of the project site were notified by mail on October 12, 2000. A notice of public hearing on a display board measuring at least 4 foot by 6 foot was posted at the project site for at least 10 days before the hearing. Also, a notice of public hearing was posted at three public places. 3. On October 24, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar on conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. B. Resolution Now, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission -of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: 1. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that ali of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 1 2. The Planning Commission hereby determines that the project identified above in this resolution is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and guidelines set forth thereafter, pursuant to Section 15301 �e)(2) of Article 19 of Chapter 3; Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 3. The Planning' Commission hereby specifically finds and determines that, having considered the record as a whole including the findings set forth in the application, and changes and altera'tionsl' which have been incorporated into and conditioned upon the proposed project set forth in the application, there is no evidence before the Planning Commission that the project proposed herein will have the potential of an adverse effect on wild life resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Based upon substantial evidence, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effects contained in Section 753.5 (d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth herein, the Planning Commission hereby finds as follows: a) The project relates to an irregularly shaped lot, which contains a 3,110 square foot, two story, single family residence. The rear yard slopes down toward the canyon. According to the Tract Map, the project site does not contain any easements and restricted use areas. The Tract Map indicates the project site is approximately 2.60 gross acres and 2.50 net acres. b) The existing single family residence is a legal non- conforming structure due to the front yard setback. c) The project site is zoned Single Family Residential - Minimum Lot Size 40,000 Square Feet (R-1-40,000). It has a General Plan Land Use designation of Rural Residential (RR). d) Generally, the following zones surround the subject site: to the north, south, east and west, is the R-1- 40,000 Zone. e) The proposed project is a request to remodel and add approximately 4,607 square feet to an existing 3,110 2 �< s square foot, two story, single family residence with a three car garage. The request also includes a deck. - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FINDINGS: f) The design and layout of the proposed development are consistent with the General Plan, development standards of the applicable district, design guidelines, and architectural criteria for special areas, (e.g. theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards, planned developments); The proposed project complies with the elements of the adopted General Plan of July 25, 1995, which has a land use designation of Rural Residential (RR-1- du/acre). Additionally, the proposed project complies with the City's General Plan objectives and strategies related to maintaining the integrity of residential neighborhoods. Furthermore, the proposed design and layout is compatible with the eclectic architectural style and design, materials and colors of existing homes within the surrounding area. The applicant obtained the Country Estates architectural committee approval to ensure compatibility. k g) The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future development, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. The project site includes a single family residence, which is similar in design and -layout to the surrounding single family residences. Furthermore, - although the existing house is two stories in height, the proposed addition is for an enlarged two- story single family residence. The proposed project is anticipated to be 25' 4 1/a" in height although the Development Code allows a maximum height of 351. Nevertheless, staff believes there will be not view obstruction issues. The rear yard of the project site slopes down into the canyon. The proposed project is not expected to unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. The project site is adequately ! served by Ridgeline Road. This private street is 3 ��uduIinHi,ii ,iii i designed to handle minimum traffic created by this type of development. h) The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain and enhance the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by section 22.48.040 of the Development Code, the ,General Plan, or any, applicable specific plan; The proposed project's architectural design is compatible with the eclectic architectural style of other homes within the Country Estates. One distinct hfeature of project includes a brick fagade. The brick veneer provides additional color and texture variation. It also provides a visual distinction between the first and second stories floors. Unique architectural features include pre -cast concrete quoins and concrete balustrades for the balconies and decks, which help create a more customized design. The materials/color board for the proposed project was approved by the Country Estate's architectural h committee. Therefore, the colors and materials utilized are compatible with the surrounding homes in the area. i) The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture and color, and will remain aesthetically appealing; As noted in item (h), the proposed project's architectural style is contemporary. It is compatible with the eclectic architectural style of other homes within the Country Estates. The applicant received approval by the Country Estates architectural committee in order to ensure that a desirable environment for it occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors is achieved through good aesthetic use of materials, texture and color, and will remain aesthetically appealing. j) The proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious (e.g. negative effect on property values or 4 dnl.,.r — --�..,.„.,- - �:,�..p✓.. ..t;.;-"4=,an,,..-�„= _ .„�,o-,u,..iN.,,.�nti,«.,..,�..iq,uti.���..,idc.» -- I _ `_. — - '— - _ - -- ---- _'-- - —' — r-- resale (s) of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity; and City permits, inspections, and soils reports are required for construction to ensure that the finished product will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. k) The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The City has determined that this project is categorically exempt pursuant to the guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15301(e) (2) . 5. Based upon the findings and conclusion set forth above, the Planning Commission hereby approves this Application subject to the following conditions: a) The project shall substantially conform to site plan, floor plans, elevations, cross sections, and materials/colors board collectively labeled as Exhibit "A" dated October 24, 2000 as submitted to and approved by the Planning Commission, and amended herein. b) The subject site shall be maintained in a condition, which is free of debris both during and after the construction, addition, or implementation of the entitlement granted herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether during or subsequent to construction shall be done only by the property owner, applicant, or by duly permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste from residential, commercial, construction, and industrial areas within the City. It shall be the applicant's obligation to insure that the waste contractor utilized has obtained permits from the City of Diamond Bar to provide such services. c) Before construction begins, the applicant shall install temporary construction fencing pursuant to the Building and Safety Division's requirements along the 5 project site's perimeter. This fencing shall remain until the Building Official approves its removal. d) The single family structure shall meet the State and Local Building Codes (i.e. 1998 California Building Code, California Plumbing Code, California Mechanical Code, and California Electrical Code) requirements and Fire Department requirements. e) The minimum design wind pressures shall be 80 miles per hour & "C" exposure. f) This single family home is located in "Fire Zone 4" and shall meet all requirements of the fire zone: 1) All roof covering shall be "Fire Retardant". Tile roofs shall be fire stopped at the eaves to preclude entry of the flame or members under the fire. 2) All unenclosed under floor areas.. shall be constructed as exterior wall. 3) All openings into the attic, floor and/or other enclosed areas shall be covered with corrosion - resistant wire mesh not less than 1/ inch nor more than % inch in any dimension except where such k openings are equipped with sash or door. 4) Chimneys shall have spark arrestors of maximum 1/Z inch screen. g) Prior to the issuance of City permits, the applicant shall submit a soils report to be reviewed and approved by the City. h) This residence shall meet the State Energy Conservation Standards. i) Building setback from any slopes (toe or top) shall meet section 18 of the 1997 Uniform Building Code or the applicant shall submit a special foundation design prepared by a Geotechnical Engineer. The special foundation design shall include the following: 1) consideration of materials, 2) height of slope, 3) slope gradient, 4) load intensity, and 5) erosion characteristics material. 0 6 F j) Surface water shall drain away from building at a 2% minimum slope. r-. k) Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit an erosion control plan for the City's review and approval. 1) Applicant shall obtain Fire department approval, which is required due to the project location. m) All walls, fences, gates, and any other structures located within the front yard setback shall not exceed 42" in height. n) Prior to the issuance of any permits, the applicant shall obtain a Minor Conditional Use Permit approval from the Planning Division. o) The applicant shall comply with Planning and Zoning and Building and Safety, and Public Works Divisions' and Fire Department requirements. p) This grant is valid for two (2) years and shall be exercised (i.e. construction) within that period or this grant shall expire. A one (1) year extension may be requested in writing and submitted to the City 30 days prior to this grant's expiration date. q) If the Department of Fish and Game determines that Fish and Game Code Section 711.2 applies to the approval of this project, then the applicant shall remit to the City a cashier's check, payable to the County Clerk, in the amount of $25.00 for a documentary handling fee in connection with Fish and Game Code requirements. Furthermore, if this project is not exempt from a filing fee imposed pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 711.4 because the project has more than a deminimus impact on fish and wildlife then the applicant shall also pay to the Department of Fish and Game any such fee and any fine which the Department determines to be owed. 7 The Planning Commission -shall: a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; andk"''"'" b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail to the property owner, Sunil Kohli, 23634 Ridgeline Road, Diamond Bar, CA 91765. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2000 BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. BY: LY- `Steve Nelson, Chairman I, James DeStefano, Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted at a regular meeting for Development Review held on the 24th day of October, 2000. - AYES: Ruzicka; Chairman Nelson; Kuo; Vice Chairman Zirbes' NOES: ABSENT: Tye ABSTAIN: BY: Ja s DeStefano, Secretary 8 It A. Recitals PLANNING COMMISSION A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 2000-19 AND CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, AN APPLICATION REQUEST TO REMODEL AND ADD APPROXIMATELY 4,607 SQUARE FEET AND DECK TO AN EXISTING- 3,110 SQUARE FOOT, TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH A THREE CAR GARAGE LOCATED AT 23634 RIDGELINE ROAD, (LOT 87 OF TRACT NO. 30091) DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA. 1. The property owner, Sunil Kohli, has filed an application for Development Review No. 2000-19 for a property located at 23634 Ridgeline Road, Diamond Bar, Los Angeles County, California as described above in the title of this resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review and Categorical Exemption shall be referred to as the "Application". 2. Notification of the public hearing for this project has been made in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers on October 13, 2000. Thirty property owners within a 500 -foot radius of the project site were notified by mail on October 12, 2000. A notice of public hearing on a display board measuring at least 4 foot by 6 foot was posted at the project site for at least -10 days before the hearing. Also, a notice of public hearing was - posted at three public places. 3. On October 24, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar on conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. B. Resolution Now, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission -of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: 1. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. The Planning Commission hereby determines that the project identified above in this resolution is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and guidelines set forth thereafter, pursuant to Section 15301 fe)(2) of Article 19 of Chapter 3, Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 3. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds and determines that, having considered the record as a whole including the findings set forth in the application, and changes and alterations which have been incorporated into and conditioned upon the proposed project set forth in the application, there is no evidence before the Planning Commission that the project proposed herein will have the potential of an adverse effect on wild life resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Based upon substantial evidence, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effects contained in Section 753.5 (d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth herein, the Planning Commission hereby finds as follows: a) The project relates to an irregularly shaped lot, which contains a 3,110 square foot, two story, single family residence. The rear yard slopes down toward the canyon. According to the Tract Map, the project site does not contain any easements and restricted use areas. The Tract Map indicates the project site is approximately 2.60 gross acres and 2.50 net acres. b) The existing single family residence is a legal nonconforming structure due to the c) The project site is zoned Single Family ResidentialMinimum Lot Size 40,000 Square Feet (R-1-40,000). -It has a General Plan Land Use designation of Rural Residential (RR). d) Generally, the following site: to the zones surround the subject east and north, south, 40,000 Zone. e) The proposed project is a request to remodel and add approximately 4,607 square foot, two story, single family residence with a three car garage. The request also includes a deck. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FINDINGS: f) The design and layout of the proposed development ar-e consistent with the General Plan, development standards of the applicable district, design guidelines, and architectural criteria for special areas, (e.g. theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards, planned developments); The proposed project complies with the elements of the adopted General Plan of July 25, 1995, which has a land use designation of Rural Residential (RR-1du/acre). Additionally, the proposed project complies with the City's General Plan objectives and strategies related to maintaining the integrity of residential neighborhoods. Furthermore, the proposed design and layout is compatible with the eclectic architectural style and design, materials and colors of existing homes within the surrounding area. The applicant obtained the Country Estates architectural committee approval to ensure compatibility. g) The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future development, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. The project site includes a single family residence, which is similar in design and- - layout to the surrounding single family residences. Furthermore, although the existing house is two stories in height, the proposed addition is for an enlarged two- story single family residence. The proposed project is anticipated to be 25, 4 1/4- in height although the Development Code allows a maximum height of 35'. Nevertheless, staff believes there will be not view obstruction issues. The rear yard of the project site slopes down into the canyon. The proposed project is not expected to unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. The project site is adequately served by Ridgeline Road. This private street is designed to handle minimum traffic created by this type of development. h) The architectural design of the proposed development is compatibl e with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain and enhance the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by section 22.48.040 of the Development Code, the General Plan, or any applicable specific plan; The proposed project's architectural design is compatible with the eclectic architectural style of other homes within the Country Estates. one distinct feature of project includes a brick fagade. The brick veneer provides additional color and texture variation. It also provides a visual distinction between the first and second stories floors. Unique architectural features include pre -cast concrete quoins and concrete balustrades for the balconies and decks, which help create a more customized design. The materials/color board for the proposed project was approved by the Country Estate's architectural committee. Therefore, the colors and materials utilized are compatible with the surrounding homes in the area. i) The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture and color, and will remain aesthetically appealing; As noted in item (h), the proposed project's architectural style is contemporary. It is compatible with the eclectic architectural style of other homes within the Country Estates. The applicant received approval by the Country Estates architectural committee in order to ensure that a desirable environment for it occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors is achieved through good aesthetic use of materials, texture and color, and will remain aesthetically appealing. j) The proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious (e.g. negative effect on property values or resale (s) of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity; and City permits, inspections, and soils reports are required for construction to ensure that the finished product will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. k) The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The City has determined that this project is categorically exempt pursuant to the guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 153 01 (e) (2) . 5. Based upon the findings and conclusion set forth above, the Planning Commission hereby approves this Application subject to the following conditions: a) The project shall substantially conform to site plan, floor plans, elevations, cross sections, and materials/colors board collectively labeled as Exhibit "A" dated October 24, 2000 as submitted to and approved by the Planning Commission, and amended herein. b) The subject site shall be maintained in a condition, which is free of debris both during and after the construction, addition, or implementation of the entitlement granted herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether during or subsequent to construction shall be done only by the property owner, applicant, or by duly permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste from residential, commercial, construction, and industrial areas within the City. It shall be the applicant's obligation to insure that the waste contractor utilized has obtained permits from the City of Diamond Bar to provide such services. c) Be f ore construction begins, the a-o-olicant shall install temporary construction fencing pursuant to the Building and Safety Division's requirements along the project site's perimeter. This fencing shall remain until the Building official approves its removal. d) The single family structure shall meet the State and Local Building Codes (i.e. 1998 California Building Code, California Plumbing -Code, California Mechanical Code, and California Electrical Code) requirements and Fire Department requirements. e) The minimum design wind pressures shall be 80 miles per hour & IICII exposure. f) This single family home is located in "Fire Zone 41' and shall meet all requirements of the fire zone: 1) All roof covering shall be "Fire Retardant". Tile roofs shall be fire stopped at the eaves to preclude entry of the flame or members under the fire. 2) All unenclosed under floor areas.. shall be constructed as exterior wall. 3) All openings into the attic, floor and/or other enclosed areas shall be covered with corrosionresistant wire mesh not less than 1/4 inch nor more than 1/2 inch in any dimension except where such openings are equipped with sash or door. 4) Chimneys shall have spark arrestors of maximum I/A inch screen. g) Prior to the issuance of shall submit a City permits, the applicant report to be soils approved by the City. reviewed and h) This residence shall Conservation meet the State Energy Standards. i) Building setback from any slopes (toe or top) shall meet section 18 of the 1997 Uniform Building Code or the applicant shall submit a special foundation design prepared by a Geotechnical Engineer. The special foundation design shall include the following: 1) consideration of materials, 2) height of slope, 3) slope gradient, 4) load intensity, and 5) erosion characteristics material. r 11 IIN j) Surface water shall drain away from building at a 2% minimum slope. k) Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit an erosion control plan for the City's review and approval. 1) Applicant shall obtain Fire department approval, which is required due to the project location. m) All walls, fences, gates, and any other structures located within the front yard setback shall not exceed 42ff in height. I n) Prior to the issuance of any permits, the applicant shall obtain a Minor Conditional Use Permit approval from the Planning Division. o) The applicant shall comply with Planning and Zoning and Building and Safety, and Public Works Divisions' and Fire Department requirements. p) This grant is valid for two (2) years and shall be exercised (i.e. construction) within that period or this grant shall expire. A one (1) year extension may be requested in writing and submitted to the City 30 days prior to this grant's expiration date. q) If the Department of Fish and Game determines that Fish and Game Code Section 711.2 applies to the approval of this project, then the applicant shall remit to the City a cashier's check, payable to the County Clerk, in the amount of $25.00 for a documentary handling fee in connection with Fish and Game Code requirements. Furthermore, if this project is not exempt from a filing fee imposed pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 711.4 because the project has more than a deminimus impact on fish and wildlife then the applicant shall also pay to the Department of Fish and Game any such fee and any fine which the Department determines to be owed. The Planning Commission -shall: a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail to the property owner, Sunil Kohli, 23634 Ridgeline Road, Diamond Bar, CA 91765. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2000 BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. "'.I BY: I, James DeStefano, Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted at a regular meeting for Development Review held on the 24 th day o f October, 2000. AYES: Ruzicka; Chairman Nelson; Kuo; Vice Chairman Zirbes NOES: ABSENT: Tye ABSTAIN: BY: Ys 4DeStefano, Sec Ja s DeStefano, Secretary