HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC 92-17RESOLUTION NO. 92-17
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DENYING THE APPEAL
FOR ADMINISTRATIVE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 92-
7 AND CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, AN APPLICATION
FOR A 2,679 SQUARE FOOT ADDITION TO A TWO
STORY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT
22215 STEEPLECHASE LANE - LOT 174, TRACT
30578.
A. Recitals
1. Kilpyung and Insook Auh has filed an application
requesting an appeal of Administrative Development
Review No. 92-5 and located at 22215 Steeplechase Lane,
Diamond Bar, California, as described in the title of
this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the
subject Development Review application is referred to as
"Application".
2. On April 18, 1989, the City of Diamond Bar was
established as a duly organized municipal organization
of the State of California. On said date, pursuant to
the requirements of the California -Government Code
Section 57376, Title 21 and 22, the City Council of the
City of Diamond Bar adopted its Ordinance No. 1, thereby
adopting the Los Angeles County Code as the ordinances
of the City of Diamond Bar. Title 21 and 22 of the Los
Angeles County Code contains the Development Code of the
County of Los Angeles now currently applicable to
development applications, including the subject
Application, within the City of Diamond Bar.
3. This Commission hereby finds that the proposed project
described in this Resolution conforms to the General
Plan of the City of Diamond Bar.
4. The Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar, on
July 27, 1992 conducted a duly noticed public hearing on
said Application.
5. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolu-
tion have occurred.
B. Resolution
NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows:
1
1. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that
all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of
this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that
the project identified above in this Resolution is
categorically exempt from the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as
amended, and guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant
to Section 15301 ( e) (2) (A&B) of Division 6 of Title 14
of the California Code of Regulations.
3. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds and
determines that, having considered the record as a
whole, there is no evidence before this Commission that
the project as proposed by the Application, and
conditioned for approval herein, will have the potential
of an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the
habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Based upon
substantial evidence presented in the record before the
Commission, the Commission hereby rebuts the presumption
of adverse effect contained in Section 753.5 (d) of
Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
Notwithstanding the provisions of this paragraph, the
Applicant shall pay all fees required for the filing of
a Notice of Determination and any other fees imposed by
the California Department of Fish and Game prior to the
issuance of any building permits.
4. Based upon substantial evidence presented to the
Planning Commission during the above public hearing and
oral testimony provide at the hearing, the Commission
hereby specifically finds as follows:
(a) The project relates to a site of approximately
1.17 acres of which approximately 10,000 square
feet is usable area to be developed with an
addition of 2,679 square feet to an existing 2 -
story single family residence of 2,783 square
feet, within the R-1-20,000 zone, on 22215
Steeplechase Lane, City of Diamond Bar,
California.
(b) The nature, condition, and size of the site has
been considered. The site is adequate in size to
accommodate the use and surrounded by single
family residences.
(c) The Administrative Development Review approval
will not have an adverse impact on adjacent or
adjoining residential uses. It will not be
materially detrimental to the use, enjoyment, or
2
valuation of property of other persons located in
the vicinity and will not adversely affect the
health or welfare of persons residing in the
surrounding area.
(d) The subject property shall be maintained and
operated in full compliance with the conditions of
this grant and any law, statute, ordinance or
other regulations applicable to any development or
activity of the subject property. Failure of the
permittee to cease any development shall be a
violation of these conditions.
(e) Notification of the public hearing for this
project has been made.
(f) The Administrative Development Review will not
unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment
of the existing neighborhood or future
developments, and will not create traffic or
pedestrian hazards.
(g) The architectural design of the Administrative
Development Review is compatible with the
character of the surrounding neighborhood and will
maintain the harmonious, orderly and attractive
development contemplated by the Development Review
Ordinance and the General Plan and would provide a
desirable environment for its occupant, visiting
public, and neighbors through good aesthetic use
of materials, texture and color and will retain a
reasonably adequate level of maintenance.
(h) It is hereby declared that and made a condition of
this permit that if any condition hereof is
violated, or if any law, statue, or ordinance is
violated, the permit shall lapse; provided that
the applicant has been given written notice to
cease such violation and has failed to do so for a
period of thirty (30) days.
(i) Notwithstanding any previous subsection of this
Resolution, if the Department of Fish and Game
require payment of a fee pursuant to section 711.4
of the Fish and Game Code, payment thereof shall
be made by the applicant prior to the issuance of
any building permit or any other entitlement.
5. Based upon the substantial evidence and conclusion set
forth herein above, this Commission hereby denies the ;,,,.;r;
application.
Ilia
The Planning Secretary shall:
(a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and
(b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution,
by certified mail, to Kilpyung and Insook Auh at 22225
Steeplechase Lane, Diamond Bar, CA 91765.
DENIED AND ADOPTED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JULY, 1992,
BY THE PLANNING CCOMMISSIIOON OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR.
BY: J
Bruce Flame m,gChairman
Attest: lv
Imes'
DeStefano Secretary
I, James Destefano, Community Development Director of the City of
Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was
duly introduced, passed, and adopted, at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission held on the 27th day of July, 1992.'!.
AYES: [COMMISSIONERS:] Flamenbaum, MacBride, Grothe, Meyer
NOES: [COMMISSIONERS:]
ABSENT: [COMMISSIONERS:] Li
i
4
fr
oI9 1 k r I. 7 -O . l i. RAsmm.