HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC 91-08�, -- - - i-, IIk,-.,,"Idbj41 4un..-,.._.,...— --,;,4 _ _--_i,i-_.. -,—k , ,-,-,__,,,,- 1-1-1-1111---- _ __ —. _ _ ._ _ _- __
1
RESOLUTION NO. 91- g
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, NOT APPROVING
THE REQUEST FOR TIME EXTENSION OF CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. 1634-(1) FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF
CHURCH FACILITIES WITH A MULTIPURPOSE ROOM,
CLASSROOMS, OFFICES, AND SANCTUARY ON A SITE
LOCATED TO THE WEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF
DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD AND BREA CANYON ROAD AT
3255 SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD, DIAMOND BAR
AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. Recitals.
(i) Robert S. Huff, on behalf of Diamond Bar
Evangelical Free Church, 3255 South Diamond Bar Boulevard,
Diamond Bar, California, has heretofore requested a time
extension for Conditional Use Permit 1634-(1) as described in the
title of this Resolution, hereinafter in this Resolution referred
to as "the application".
(ii) On November 14, 1990, the Planning Commission of
the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing
on the application, continued the public hearing until February
11, 1991 and concluded said public hearing on March 11, 1991.
(iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this
Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by
the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar, as follows:
1
1. This Planning Commission hereby specifically finds
that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this
Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based on the substantial evidence presented to
this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing on
November 14, 1990, continued said hearing until February 11, 1991
and concluded said hearing on March 11, 1991, including written
and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and in
conformance with the terms and provisions of California
Government Code Sections 65360, this Commission hereby
specifically finds as follows:
A. The subject property is located at 3255 South
Diamond Bar Boulevard, Diamond Bar, California.
B. The surrounding properties are developed with
single family residences to the north and east, with a vacant
school site to the south and with a commercial center and the
Orange Freeway to the west.
C. The subject property is zoned R-1 and the use
is conditionally allowed within this zone.
D. The site is designated within the U2 Zone of
the Diamond Bar Community Plan.
E. The subject property is currently developed
with a church consisting of a multipurpose room, classrooms and
offices. Additionally, a nursery and additional classrooms are
being constructed. The applicant desires to extend the time in
which the Phase III improvements are to be accomplished. Further,
2
the applicant is considering a revision to the previously
approved plans which will require further discretionary approvals
by the City.
F. The originally approved conditional use
permit was granted prior to the development of both the area
proximate to the subject property and the development of areas in
the City not immediately adjacent to the subject property but'
which contribute to environmental factors which effect the
subject property.
G. The changed conditions of the community may
require additional or modified conditions of approval to assist
in causing the development of the subject property to provide
maximum benefit to the community. The actual changed conditions
were not reasonably foreseeable or quantifiable at the time of
the original grant of approval accorded to this application. The
City desires to achieve the goal of ensuring the development of
the subject property will be complimentary to and compatible with
existing and reasonably foreseeable long term conditions in the
City.
The Planning Commission believes that the present and
proposed use of the subject property are of great benefit to the
City. The Planning Commission failed to achieve a majority
consensus as to how best to balance the development needs of the
applicant with the overall development goals and standards of the
3
City. The lack of consensus as to the scope of this balance
resulted in the applicant's request failing to obtain a majority
vote to approve the requested time extension or to continue the
request for further deliberation.
3. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth in
paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission has failed to approve
the requested time extension request.
4. This Commission hereby provides notice to Diamond
Bar Evangelical Free Church and Robert S. Huff that the time
within which judicial review of the decision represented by this
Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of
California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6
5. The Planning Commission Secretary shall:
a. Certify to the adoption of this Resolution;
and
b. Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this
Resolution to ROBERT S. HUFF and DIAMOND BAR EVANGELICAL FREE
CHURCH at their addressesasset forth on the application.
PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED th is 8th day of April, 1991.
"— �, '*1 (;&
41 -
chairman
4
--
I, JAMES DESTEFANO, Secretary of the Planning
Commission of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was passed, adopted and approved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar, at a regular
meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar
held on the 8th day of April, 1991, by the following vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
N110111RESCHRCHIDB
41
Grothe, MacBride, Lin and Ch/Schey
VC/Harmony
None
Pecr
ATTEST:_ oin—tt
arythe
Planning Commission