Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/13/2001PLANNING RL.COPY `' COMMISSION. AGENDA February 13, 2001 7:00 P.MO South Coast Air Quality Management District Auditorium 21865 East Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA Chairman Vice Chairman Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Steve Nelson Bob Zirhes George Kuo Joe Ruzicka Steve Tye .Copies of staff reports or other written documentation relating to agenda items are on file in the Planning Division of the Dept of Community & Development Services, located at 21660 E. Copley Drive, Suite 190, and are available for public inspection. If you have questions regarding an agenda item, please call (909) 396-5676 during regular business hours. In an effort to comply with the requirements of Title // of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the City of Diamond Bar requires that any person in need of any. type of special equipment, assistance or accommodation(s) in order to communicate at a City publicmeetingmust inform the Dept. of Community & Development Services at (909) 396-5676 a minimum of 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting. I -lease retrain trom smoking, eating or The City of Diamond Bar uses recycled paper drinking in the Auditorium and encourages you to do the same City of Diamond Bar Planning Commission PUBLIC INPUT The meetings of the Diamond Bar Planning Commission are open to the public. A member of the public may address the Commission on the subject of one or more agenda items and/or other items of which are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Diamond Bar Planning Commission. A request to address the Commission should be submitted in writing at the public hearing, to the Secretary of the Commission. As a general rule, the opportunity for public comments will take place at the discretion of the Chair. However. in order to facilitate the meeting, persons who are interested parties for an item may be requested to give their presentation at the time the item is called on the calendar. The Chair may limit individual public input to five minutes on any item; or the Chair may limit the total amount of time allocated for public testimony based on the number of people requesting to speak and the business of the Commission. Individuals are requested to conduct themselves in a professional and businesslike manner. Comments and questions are welcome so that all points of view are considered prior to the Commission making recommendations to the staff and City Council. In accordance with State Law (Brown Act), all matters to be acted on by the Commission must be posted at least 72 hours prior to the Commission meeting. In case of emergency or when a subject matter arises subsequent to the posting of the agenda, upon making certain findings, the Commission may act on item that is not on the posted agenda. INFORMATION RELATING TO AGENDAS AND ACTIONS OF THE COMMISSION Agendas for Diamond Bar Planning Commission meetings are prepared by the Planning Division of the Community and Development Services Department. Agendas are available 72 hours prior to the meeting at City Hall and the public library, and may be accessed by personal computer at the number below. Every meeting of the Planning Commission is recorded on cassette tapes and duplicate tapes are available for a nominal charge. ADA REQUIREMENTS, A cordless microphone is available for those persons with mobility impairments who cannot access the public speaking area. The service of the cordless microphone and sign language interpreter services are available by giving notice at least three business days in advance of the meeting. Please telephone (909) 396-5676 between 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m., Monday through Thursday, and 7:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Friday. HELPFUL PHONE NUMBERS Copies of Agenda, Rules of the Commission, Cassette Tapes of Meetings (909) 396-5676 Computer Access to Agendas (909) 860 -LINE General Agendas (909) 396-5676 email: info@ci.diamond-bar.ca.us PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF DIAMOND BAR Tuesday, February 13, 2001 CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 p.m. Next Resolution No. 2001-06 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: 1. ROLL CALL: COMMISSIONERS: Chairman Steve Nelson, Vice Chairman Bob Zirbes, George Kuo, Joe Ruzicka, and Steve Tye. 2. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is the time and place for the general public to address the members of the Planning Commission on any item that is within their jurisdiction, allowing the public an opportunity to speak on non-public hearing and non -agenda items. Please complete a Speaker's Card for the recording Secretary (Comt)letion of this form is voluntary.) There is a five-minute maximum time limit when addressing the Planning Commission. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Chairman 4. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following items listed on the consent calendar are considered routine and are approved by a single motion. Consent calendar items may be removed from the agenda by request of the Commission only: 4.1 Minutes: January 23, 2001. 5. OLD BUSINESS: None. 5.1 Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-02, and Development Review No. 2000-20 (pursuant to Code Sections 22.58.020, 22.42.130 G, and 22.48.020) are requests to co - locate a telecommunications facility on an existing monopole approved on January 25, 1993, by Conditional Use Permit No. 92-11. The request also includes an equipment cabinet and utility pedestal within a concrete pad for both. (Public hearing concluded on January 23, 2001) -:\zste11a\agenda\feb 13 01.doc February 13, 2001 Page 2 Planning Commission Project Address: Diamond Bar High School 21400 Pathfinder Road Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Property Owner: Walnut. Valley Unified School District 880 South Lemon Avenue Walnut, CA 91789 Applicant: Metricom, Inc. 1460 East 33rd Street Signal Hill, CA 90807 Environmental Determination: Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section 15301(b), the City has determined that this project is categorically exempt. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2001 -XX, denying Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-02, and Development Review No. 2000-20. 6. NEW BUSINESS: None. 7. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: None. 8. PUBLIC HEARING: None. 8.1 Development Review No. 2000-22 (pursuant to Code Section 22.48.020) is a request to construct a two story single family residence of approximately 10,630 square feet. This includes garage areas that will accommodate six cars, covered patios, and rear decks. Additionally, this request is for an outdoor pool. PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1200 Chisholm Trail (Lots 14 & 15, Tract No. 37873) Diamond Bar, CA 91765 PROPERTY OWNER: Adriana Amaral 23125 Rio Lobos Road Diamond Bar, CA 91765 APPLICANT: Federal Fire Reconstruction Inc. 727 Brea Canyon Road, #114 Diamond Bar, CA 91765 February 13, 2001 Page 3 Planning Commission ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section 15303 (a), the Cite has determined that this project is categorically exempt.. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue Development Review No. 2000-22 to a future public hearing date to allow the applicant time to submit a re -designed project. 8.2 Development Review No. 2000-23 and Minor Variance No. 2001-01 (pursuant to Code Section 22.48.020) is a request to construct a three story single family residence of approximately 13,105 square feet with garage areas that will accommodate four cars and rear decks. The Minor Variance is required for a reduced front yard setback. PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1621 Derringer Lane (Lot 10, Tract 24046) Diamond Bar, CA 91765 ' PROPERTY OWNER Elie Abinader . APPLICANT: 1418 East 33rd Street Signal Hill, CA 90807 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section 15303 (a), the City has determined that this project is categorically exempt. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review No. 2000-23 and Minor Variance No. 2001-01, Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval, as listed within the resolution. 8.3 Administrative Development Review No. 2001-01 and Variance No. 2001-02 (pursuant to Code Sections 22.48.020 B.1. and 22.54.020 D.) is a request to construct a two-story single family residence with a -four-car garage and balconies totaling to approximately 800 square feet. Additionally, this request includes a tennis court and retaining walls within the rear and side yards. The Variance request is for the retaining walls that exceed six feet in height. PROPERTY ADDRESS: 2888 Crystal Ridge Road (Parcel B, Tract 47850) Diamond Bar, CA 91765 PROPERTY OWNER/ Diamond Bar West, LLC APPLICANT: 3480 Torrance Boulevard, Suite 300 Torrance, CA 90503 February 13, 2001 0 Page 4 Planning Commission ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City has determined that this project is consistent -with the -previously certified Environmental Impact Report No. 91-2 for Tract Map No. 47850. Therefore, no further environmental review is required. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Administrative Development Review No. 2001-01 and Variance No. 2001-02, Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval, as listed within the resolution. 8.4 _Conditional Use Permit No. 2000=04 and Development Review No. 2000-10 (pursuant to Code Sections 22.58 and 22.48.020.A.) this proposed project is a request to install two additional monopoles, approximately 28 feet high with two antennas on each monopole and an equipment cabinet enclosed by a block wall. The project site, approximately seven acres, currently contains a residential structure and an unmanned, wireless telecommunications facility. PROPERTY ADDRESS: 24401 Darrin Drive 91765 (Lot 51, Tract No. 42584) Diamond Bar, CA 91765 PROPERTY OWNER: Eric Stone 24401 Darrin Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 APPLICANT: Nextel Telecommunications 310 Commerce Irvine, CA 92602 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section 15303(e), the City has determined that this project is categorically exempt. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-04 and Development Review No. 2000-10, Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval, as listed within the resolution. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS: 10. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 10.1 Public Hearing dates for future protects. February 13, 2001 Page 5 Planning Commission 11. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: JOINT CITY COUNCIL/ PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: (Community/Senior Center) SPECIAL PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION: gw�"110 : I I 129IN001.01• PRESIDENT'S BIRTHDAY: CITY COUNCIL MEETING: JOINT PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION/TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING: COMMUNITY COORDINATING COMMITTEE: ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 — 6:00 p.m. AQMD Auditorium 21865 E. Copley Drive Thursday, February 13, 2001 — 7:00 p.m. AQMD Board Hearing Room 21865 E. Copley Drive Thursday, February 15, 2001 — 7:30 p.m. AQMD Room CC -8 21865 E. Copley Drive Monday, February 19, 2001 City offices will be closed. Offices will reopen on Tuesday, February 20, 2001 Tuesday, February 20, 2001 — 6:30 p.m. AQMD Auditorium 21865 E. Copley Drive Thursday, February 22, 2001 — 7:00 p.m. AQMD Board Hearing Room 21865 E. Copley Drive Monday, February 26, 2001 — 7:00 p.m. AQMD, Room CC -2 21865 E. Copley Drive Tuesday, February 27, 2001 — 6:00 p.m. AQMD Auditorium 21865 E. Copley Drive February 13, 2001 Page 6 Planning Commission PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: HOME COMPOST WORKSHOP: 12. ADJOURNMENT: Tuesday, February 27, 2001— 7:00 p.m. AQM[D Auditorium 21865 E. Copley Drive Saturday, March 3, 2001 10:00 a.m. to Noon Heritage Park, 2900 S. Brea Canyon Rd. MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 23, 2001 - CALL TO ORDER: Vice Chairman Zirbes called the meeting to order at 7: 10 p.m. in the South Coast Air Quality Management C, C:1 Auditorium, 21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance was led by C/Ruzicka. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Vice Chairman Bob Zirbes, and Commissioners George Kuo, Steve Tye and Joe Ruzicka. Chairman Steve Nelson was excused. Also Present: Ann J. Lungu, Associate Planner; David Meyer, Planning Consultant; Sonya Joe, Development Services Assistant, Stella Marquez, Administrative Secretary. 2. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: None offered. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: As AuC)endized. 4. CONSENT CALENDAR: 4.1 Minutes of the January 9, 2001, Meeting. C/Ruzjcka moved; C/Tye seconded, to approve the minutes of January 9, 2001, as presented. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: C) AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Kuo, Tye, Ruzicka, VC/Zirbes NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Chair/Nelson 5. OLD BUSINESS: None 6. PUBLIC HEARING: None JANUARY 23, 2001 PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION 7. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: 7.1 Conditional Use Permit No 2000-02, and Development Review No. 2000-20 (pursuant to Code Sections 22.58.020, 22.42.130 G and 22.48.020) are requests to co -locate a telecommunications facility on an existing monopole approved on January 25, 1993, by Conditional Use Permit No. 92- 11. The request also includes an equipment cabinet, utility pedestal and concrete pad for both. (Continued from January 9, 2001) PROJECT ADDRESS: PROPERTY OWNER APPLICANT: Diamond Bar High School 21400 Pathfinder Road Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Walnut Valley Unified School District 880 South Lemon avenue Walnut, CA 91789 Metricom, Inc. 1460 East 33`d Street Signal Hill, CA 90807 David Meyer, Planning Consultant, presented staff's report. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission re -open the public hearing, receive testimony, and then select from the following options: 1) close the public hearing and direct staff to prepare a resolution of approval or denial to be presented to the Commission at its next regularly scheduled meeting for adoption; or 2) continue the public hearing to a date certain and direct the applicant to provide staff with the appropriate information. Keyur Mistry, representing Metricom, Inc. explained that Metricom is, in fact, an Internet access provider and not a voice provider. He believes that the future of the wireless industry is the internet (data) rather than voice. With respect to landscaping, he met with PC/Meyer at the site, which resulted in the plan that is before the Commission tonight. In accordance with the Telecommunications Industry Association's standards, Spectracide, felt that it was unsafe to add any screening materials to a 60 foot monopole of this type due to the wind load factor. VC/Zirbes re -opened the public hearing. Craig Clute 21217 Fountain Springs Road, read from a letter with attached drawings dated January 16, 2001, which he presented to the Commission commenting on: 1) designed functionality and co -location alternatives, 2) Structural Engineering and Design, 3) Utilities Installation and 4) Landscape Plan. He also presented photographs of the area and reiterated his concerns about the view and the sound level readings emanating from the site. He maintains that the site has not been maintained according to the original approval. VC/Zirbes closed the public hearing. JANUARY 23; 2001 PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION C/Ruzicka said that Mr. Clute raises valid concerns about this project and offers some constructive approaches to alternative solutions. He was impressed with staff's courtesy and tact in this instance because the applicant's proposal does not address the Commission's concerns previously expressed. He asked the applicant to address Mr. Clute's concerns. Keyur Mistry said he does not have a copy of Mr. Clute's letter but he would be happy to address the concerns. C/Ruzicka reiterated that Mr. Clute's concerns are valid and constructive, and need to be addressed. If the applicant is unable to approach the project as suggested by Mr. Clute, he would like to hear the applicant's reasons. He also wants to know why the applicant believes that seven five -gallon potted plants will take care of the Commissions' concerns. Keyur Mistry said that Metricom has a staff of site acquisition specialists who determine appropriate locations with respect to its (Metricom) requirements for height, etc. The high school location was determined to be an ideal location. Diamond Bar High School would not allow Metricom to place its antenna on one of their buildings, only on the existing monopole. He stated that he and PC/Meyer determined that the shrubs would be an adequate solution when they visited the site to discuss the proposed screening. Metricom is prepared to add bushes up to the monopole in order to block out the fencing to the extent possible. C/Kuo asked the applicant if he has experience with safety problems related to screening of other projects. Keyur Mistry responded that very few monopoles have screening around one array of antennas. Many installations are attached to buildings. He is not aware that this situation has confronted them in previous installations. C[Ruzicka said that this is an opportunity for Metricom to address the issue in conjunction with valid concerns and suggestions that have been made by a resident who will have to view the site on a regular basis. Keyur Mistry said that although he understands C[Ruzicka's point the applicant's primary concern is safety. Metricom has been told -by the engineers who studied this tower that it would not be allowed to install screening material on the antennas. Keyur Mistry indicated to C/Tye that the first location considered was a building on the high school campus, which was refused by the school district. He does not know if alternative sites were considered. Existing monopoles are a first choice consideration. He stated that to tear down an existing monopole and construct a $50,0004100,000 monopole JANUARY 23, 2001 PAGE 4 PLANNING COMMISSION would not work for any company and especially not for a new company like Metricom. which is in the process of spending a lot of money to build a network. Companies look for the most feasible location. -To co -locate would-be substantially less costly. - --- VC/Zirbes said he believes the design of the existing monopole is inadequate and has a negative impact on the view scape for the residents who live in the area. Two months ago the Commission asked the applicant to screen the installation. The only thing the applicant has done is to ask the existing pole owner if they can handle any kind of screen and the owner has stated that the pole cannot handle screening which means that the pole cannot he shielded. He does not believe the applicant has provided sufficient evidence to indicate that they have made an earnest effort to seek an alternative site. He does not believe that the existing monopole is the anchor to the'.'quilt." He does not see any substantial reason to move forward to approve the project. VC/Zirbes moved, C/Tye seconded, to direct staff to prepare a resolution of denial for Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-02, and Development Review No. 2000-20 including a condition that the applicant remove the public hearing notice from the property for presentation at the next Commission meeting. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Kuo, Ruzicka, Tye, VC/Zirbes NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Chair/Nelson 7.2 Development Review No. 2000-15 (pursuant to Code Section 22.48.020) is a request to construct a two-story, single-family residence of approximately 9,471 square feet, with a basement, balconies, porch, and a three -car, 1546 square foot garage. Additionally, the request includes an accessory gazebo structure containing approximately 400 square feet under roof. (Continued from December 12, 2000) PROJECT ADDRESS 1819 Derringer Lane Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Hardip Gill 100 Stagecoach Circle West Covina, CA 91791 APPLICANT: Chary Dagam 1000 North Regal Canyon Drive Walnut, CA 91789 PC/Meyer presented staff's report. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review No. 2000-15, Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval, as listed with the resolution. JANUARY 23, 2001 PAGE 5 PLANNING COMMISSION VC/Zirbes opened the public hearing. Chary Dagam, project architect, pointed out that the lot area is 67,000 square feet. The design included a three -car garage. However, The Country Estates Homeowners Association requested a four -car garage which the revised plans reflect. The house has been designed to be compatible with "The Country Estates" architectural styles and standards. Further, the house has been designed to provide for the minimum amount of grading possible. 0 t�l VC/Zirbes closed the public hearing. C/Ruzicka moved, C/Tye seconded, to approve Development Review No. 2000-15, Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval as stated in the resolution subject to amending the resolution to indicate a four -car garage instead of a three -car garage (Page 2, Item 4 (e).). Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Kuo, Ruzicka, Tye, VC/Zirbes NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Chair/Nelson 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None. 9. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS: VC/Zirbes asked if staff can include as a condition to require that the applicant remove the public hearing notice sign from their property within a certain number of days of completion of the public hearing process. Further, can the C� applicant be required to post a deposit in an amount sufficient to cover the city's cost of removal in the event that the applicant fails to comply. 10. PC/Meyer said he would discuss the matter with ICM/DeStefano and report back to the Planning Commission at its next meeting. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 10.1 Maintenance Ordinance - Specifically, roofing requirements. VC/Zirbes asked staff to prepare a report/draft ordinance/code amendment for discussion at a future Commission meeting. C/Ruzicka suggested that the matter be considered at a future date when several Development Code items are discussed. PC/Meyer suggested that Development Code amendments be considered after the selection C,— of a new City Manager. JANUARY 23, 2001 +Y .c PLANNING COMMISSION AssocP/Lungu informed the Commission that staff is currently working on the second round of Development Code amendments. 10.2 Planners Institute - Monterey, CA - March 21 through 23, 2001. C/Ruzicka, C/Tye and VC/Zirbes indicated they will attend. C/Kuo said he is unable to attend this year. VC/Zirbes asked staff to pursue alternative flights directly into Monterey because he has a conflict on the evening of March 23. He would prefer to leave around 1:00 p.m. on Friday afternoon. C/Ruzicka also asked that a direct flight from Ontario or LAX to Monterey and return be provided if possible. 10.3 Public Hearing dates for future proiects. 11. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: As listed in the Agenda. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to come before the Planning Commission, Vice Chairman Zirbes adjourned the meeting at 8:30 p:m. Respectfully Submitted, James DeStefano Interim City Manager Attest: Vice Chairman Bob Zirbes City of Diamond Bar PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 5.1 REPORT DATE: February 6, 2001 MEETING DATE: February 13, 2001 CASEXILE NUMBER: Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 2000-02 Development Review Permit No. DR 2000-20 APPLICATION REQUEST: To install a three panel antenna on an existing 60 -foot high monopole and to construct a 12 foot by 12 foot concrete slab upon which a five-foot high nine square foot equipment cabinet and associated utility meter will be installed PROJECT LOCATION: 21400 Pathfinder Road Diamond Bar, CA 91765 (Diamond Bar High School) PROPERTY OWNER: Walnut Valley Unified School District 880 South Lemon Ave. Walnut, CA 91789 APPLICANT: Metricom, Inc 1460 East 33rd Street Signal Hill, CA 90807 BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission held a public hearing for this proposed project on November 28, 2000, and January 23, 2001. The public hearing was closed and the Planning Commission directed staff to prepare a resolution denying the proposed project based on information presented during the public hearing process. The resolution is to be presented to the Planning Commission at its regular meeting of February 13, 2001. ANALYSIS: The attached draft resolution contains information upon which the Planning Commission based its decision to deny the proposed project. The public hearing has been closed and the Planning Commission should not solicit additional testimony regarding this application. However, the Planning Commission may request information or elaboration from individuals it deems essential in order to conclude its deliberation and decision making process. The staff will be available to respond to the Commission's inquiries. The staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution as presented. Prepared by: LDM Associates Planning Consultant Attachment: Draft Resolution gA\StaffReportsPOCUP00-2 2140OPathfmdenwrieom-feb13 01 2 -- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -XX A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DENYING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 2000-20, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2000- 02 AND APPROVING A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, A REQUEST TO CO -LOCATE A TELECOMMUNICATION ANTENNA ON AN EXISTING MONOPOLE AND TO CONSTRUCT A NINE SQUARE FOOT EQUIPMENT CABINENT AT AN EXISTING FACILITY. THE PROJECT SITE IS LOCATED AT 21400 PATHFINDER ROAD (DIAMOND BAR HIGH SCHOOL), DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA. A. RECITALS. The applicant Metricom, Inc., and property owner, Walnut Valley Unified School district filed an application for a Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-02 and Development Review Permit No. 2000-20 for property located at 21400 Pathfinder Road, Diamond Bar, Los Angeles County, California. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review Permit, Conditional Use Permit, and Categorical Exemption shall be referred to as the "Application." 2. On November 17, 2000, public hearing notices were mailed to approximately 296 property owners within a 700 -foot radius of the project site, and posted in three public places. On November 17, 2000, the project site was posted with a display board. On November 17, 2000, notification of the public hearing for this project was provided in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers. 3. On November 28, 2000, and January 23, 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted duly noticed public hearings on the Application. NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: This Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. ?. The Planning Commission hereby finds that the Environmental Categorical Exemption has been prepared by the City of Diamond Bar in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970 and guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15301(b). Furthermore, the Categorical Exemption reflects the independent judgement of the City of Diamond Bar and is hereby adopted. 3. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein, this Planning Commission hereby finds as follows: (a) The project site is a fully developed public high school and the proposed project is the co -location of a telecommunication antenna to be attached to an existing monopole. (b) The project site has a General Plan land use designation of Low Density Residential. (c) The project site is zoned R-1 (7,500). (d) Generally, the site is surrounded to the north, south, and east with R-1 (7,500) zoned property. The property to the west is zoned CPD (Commercial Planned Development). Development Review (e) The design and layout of the proposed development is not consistent with the applicable elements of the City's General Plan, City Design Guidelines, and development standards of the applicable district and architectural criteria for special areas (e.g., theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards or planned developments). The proposed project does not meet the City's criteria for environmental integration whereas to the extent feasible the proposed facility should blend into the surrounding environment or be architecturally integrated into a concealing structure. (f) The design and layout of the proposed development will interfere with the use and enjoyment of exiting neighboring properties. However, the proposed project will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. The Planning Commission received testimony from an adjacent property owner that the proposed project would negatively impact the neighborhood because inadequate screening techniques would be employed, thereby, subjecting the residential neighborhood to views of inappropriate commercial equipment. (g) The Planning Commission received testimony from the applicant that the existing monopole is structurally insufficient to accommodate an additional 4 screened antenna and that the structural safety requirements of TIA/TIA- 222-F would not be met. (h) The proposed development would be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare or could be materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Conditional Use Permit (i) The proposed use is allowed within the subject zone district with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit if it complies with applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Municipal Code. The proposed telecommunication project is permitted on the subject property as set forth in Section 22.42.130 of the Diamond Bard Development Code in the event that the proposed project complies with the development standards set forth therein. However, the Planning Commission finds that the proposed project does not comply with the established development criteria and the reasons are set forth herein (see B-3 (e, f, g, & h). (j) The proposed use is not consistent with the General Plan land use goals and objective. (k) The design, location, size and operating characteristics of the proposed use are not compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity. Information has been provided to the Planning Commission indicating that the addition of the proposed antenna would negatively impact the existing residential aesthetics. (l) The subject site is not physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of use being proposed including access, provision of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and the absence of physical constraints. The applicant has provided the Planning Commission with information that the existing monopole is incapable of safely supporting a screened antenna. (m) Granting the Conditional Use Permit will be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity and zoning district in which the property is located. The existing facility is incapable of supporting a properly screened antenna as indicated by the applicant. 4. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth above, the Planning Commission hereby denies the Application. The Planning Commission shall: (a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and (b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, to: Walnut Valley Unified School District, 880 South Lemon Ave., Walnut, CA 91789, and Metricom, Inc., 1460 East 33rd Street, Signal Hill, CA 90867— APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13th DAY OF FEBRUARY 2001, BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. Steve Nelson, Chairman I, James DeStefano, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of February 2001, by the following vote: ATTEST: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: James DeStefano, Secretary g:RooluuousPC CUPOO.2 214ObPudUuidcrMutricorrt-febOI 4 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: REPORT DATE: MEETING DATE: CASE/FILE NUMBER: APPLICATION REQUEST: PROPERTY'LOCATION: City of Diamond Bar PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report February 1, 2001 February 13, 2001 Development Review No. 2000-22. To construct a tin family residence c 10,630 square feet. a garage area accommodate six patios, and Additionally, the an outdoor pool. o story single f approximately This includes that will cars, covered rear decks. request is for 1200 Chisholm Trail (Lots 14 and 15, Tract No. 37873) PROPERTY OWNERS: Adriana Amaral 14326 Rio Lobos Road Diamond Bar, CA 91765 APPLICANT: Federal Fire Reconstruction 727 Brea Canyon Road #14 Diamond Bar, CA 91765 BACKGROUND: The property owner, Adriana Amaral and applicant, Federal Fire Reconstruction, have submitted an application for Development Review No. 2000-22. The project site is located at 1200 Chisholm Trail. The project site is part of Tract No. 37873, which was approved for the subdivision of single family homes. The lot areas containing . single family homes within' the same tract development, range in size between 6,650 gross square feet and 18,356 gross square feet. Furthermore, these single family —homes range in size between 1,504 square feet and 2,341 square 1 feet of living area. around 1980. These said existing homes were built The subject project site is comprised of two separate lots identified as Lots 14 and 15. According to the applicant's Title Report and the Los Angeles County Tax Assessor Map, Lot 14 contains about 13,330 square feet and Lot 15 contains about 31,986 . square feet of gross square feet. The combined area of both lots is 45,316 gross square feet. As a part of this project's conditions of approval, the applicant shall be required to obtain an approval for a lot line adjustment or parcel merger prior to the issuance of a grading permit. This involves creating Lots 14 and 15 into one single lot. The lot line adjustment or parcel merger shall be reviewed and approved by the City. The combined project site areas create a kite shaped lot with a back yard that slopes downhill. Also, according to the Los Angeles County Tax Assessor Map, the project site contains an easement dedicated to Southern California Edison for utility purposes. The proposed project does not encroach into this easement. GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING The project site is zoned Single Family Residential -Minimum Lot Size 8,000 Square Feet (R-1-8,000). Its General Plan Land Use designation is Low Density Residential (RL). Generally, the following zones surround the subject site: to the north is the R -3-8,000-30U Zone, to the south and east is the R-1-8,000 Zone and to the west is the R -4-40U Zone. ANALYSIS: REVIEW AUTHORITY Pursuant to the Development Code, the Planning Commission is the hearing officer for this Development Review request. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW: The purpose of Development Review is to establish consistency with the General Plan through the promotion of high aesthetic and functional standards to compliment and add to the economic, physical, and social character of the City. The process will also ensure that new development and intensification of existing development yields a pleasant living, working, or shopping environment and attracts the interest of residents, workers, 2 shoppers, and visitors as the result of consistent exemplary design. Pursuant to Development Code Section 22.48.020, an application for Development Review is required for residential projects that propose new construction on a vacant parcel and new structures. , and reconstruction projects which are equal to 50 percent or greater of the floor area of existing structures on the site, or have a minimum 10,000 square feet of combined gross floor area. The proposed residential project involves the construction of one dwelling unit with a combined gross floor area of about 10,630 square feet. Therefore, Development Review is required. The following is a comparison of the City's required development standards and the project's proposed development standards: 3 City's Required Project's Proposed Development*Standards Development Standards 1. Setbacks: 1. Setbacks: front yard - minimum 20' front yard - approximately from property line. 31, from property line. side yards - minimum 10' side yards - approximately and 51 from property line. 15, and 20' from property line. rear yard - minimum 20' rear yard - approximately from property line. 21'plusfrom property line. 2. Building Height: - maximum 35'. 2. Building Height: - maximum 35'. 3. Parking: minimum 2 car 3. Parking: one (1) four -car garage. garage that has a 43, depth and. 2116" width and one (1) two -car Minimum 20, depth and 10 foot' garage with a 28, depth and width for each vehicle bay. 2216" width. There are a total of 6 car spaces provided. 4. -Retaining Walls: maximum 6' 4. Retaining walls: maximum exposed height. 61 exposed height. 3 5. Accessory Structures: 5. Accessory Structures: — Pool - minimum 51 between edge Pool - 51 plus between edge of of water and property line. water and all property lines. 6. Site Coverage: maximum 30 % Site Coverage: approximately 25.73 % As shown on the above matrix, the. proposed project's development standards meet the minimum Development Code requirements. However, this project challenges the purpose and intent of the City's Design Guidelines. Staff recognizes these challenges and provides a discussion below. ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES The City's Design 'Guidelines state that compatibility with adjacent uses is a primary objective. Projects should be designed to minimize negative impacts on surrounding uses. In this case, the proposed project is a single family residence adjacent to other single family homes. In this case, staff is specifically concerned with the size and scale of this project when compared to the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed single family residence has approximately 6,653 square feet of living area (a combined area of 10,130 square feet). Whereas, the surrounding homes range in size between 1,504 square feet and 2,341 square feet of living area. Nevertheless, staff feels there is a rough transition between the proposed project and adjacent uses, particularly when viewing this single family residence rear elevation. The rear elevation is massive when compared to the surrounding neighborhood. A guiding principal for good site planning is that the siting and design of structures and landscaping should ensure that they blend into the terrain and do not dominate the landform, as seen from lower elevations. The proposed project is on a hillside and can be seen from Grand Avenue and the intersection at Grand Avenue and Golden Springs Drive. Although staff feels the applicant has made a good effort at providing a quality finished product, staff feels it is necessary to provide further assurances that the rear elevation will not oppose this guiding principal. Staff recommends the applicant further address the proposed dominating structure by providing a re -designed project with primary changes to the rear elevation for the Planning Commission to review. 4 In addition, staff reviewed the proposed single family residence's architectural style, which is contemporary with some California Country style features. These features were emphasized through a good use of materials; including the use of wood siding around the entire house and river rock. Indeed, the use of -these materials provides variety and interest. The material/color board includes earth -toned colors that will also help preserve the hillside's aesthetic value. The applicant submitted a colors/materials board, which denoting the following: Dunn Edwards - Taupe for the exterior walls, Dunn Edwards - off-white for trims, and Charcoal/Brown composite shingle roof. FLOOR PLAN LAYOUT The main level floor consists of an entry way, music area, living room, family room with wet bar, dining room, kitchen, bedroom (with an adjacent - bathroom) , powder room, garage areas that will accommodate six cars, garage storage area and outdoor decks. The main level floor is approximately 3,200 square feet. The lower level floor consists of a master suite with a master bathroom and walk-in closets, sitting room, three bedrooms (each with an adjacent bathroom), mechanical room, utility room, stairs/hallways, and decorative pool. The lower floor is approximately 3,453 square feet. GRADING/SOILS A preliminary grading plan indicates there will be approximately 1,580 cubic yards of cut and approximately 1,580 cubic yards of fill. It is anticipated that there will be no export. The City received a preliminary soils report on December 19, 2000 for Planning Division review. According to the preliminary soils report, the project site contains a non -seismic fault. During the original grading of the tract, fill was placed on Lots 14 and 15. Shortly after placement of the fill, fissures began to develop in this fill. The fill was then removed from portions of the lots. Staff surmises the lots remained vacant because extensive engineering would be required before a single family residence could be built on these lots. Staff informed the applicant that these are serious engineering issues that could affect the feasibility of building at this site. Furthermore, there is a possibility that once a housing developmerit is built on this site, it could also endure damage 5 (i.e. slippage) if the engineering and design issues are not properly addressed. The applicant stated that he was aware of these engineering issues and agreed that he would need to provide for proper grading of the site in conjunction with an approved soils report analysis and an adequately contoured buildable pad. The applicant's preliminary soils report is being reviewed to meet the engineering criteria. Furthermor_e, this would require the review and approval of the Public Works Division and Building/Safety Division. The applicant also indicated that he was aware that Planning Division review was only .the first step of the City's review process for architectural design review and wished to continue processing this application. The applicant is fully aware that further review for permits shall be required. As a part of this project's conditions of approval, the applicant shall be required to submit a final grading plan and soils report for the City's review and approval. DRAINAGE The project site is presently vacant. According to the preliminary soils report, adequate drainage shall be provided. All roof and surface drainage shall be conducted away from foundation and slope areas via engineered, non-erosive devices to existing storm drain facilities on the street. The soils report further indicates that in no case shall water be allowed to pond within the site, drain towards structures or flow in concentrated and uncontrolled manner down the slopes. Therefore, it is -...anticipated the drainage impacts will be minimal. Additionally, the applicant will be required to have the proposed drainage reviewed and approved by the City's Public Works Division. RETAINING WALLS As indicated in, this report's table matrix, the maximum exposed height allowed for retaining walls is six feet. The proposed retaining walls will not exceed 6 feet in height. The applicant shall be required to indicate the location of all retaining walls (including top of wall, finished surfaces, and top of footing) on a final grading plan - along with retaining wall details and calculations for the City's review and approval. The applicant shall be required to obtain retaining wall permits from the Public Works Division before the construction of the proposed walls. More significantly, there are low walls proposed to be built at the front of the house. These low walls extend beyond the front 3 property line into the public right-of-way. Generally, encroachments are typically discouraged by the City because the these encroachments may represent a potential hazard or liability. on a case by case basis, and in this case, the City of Diamond Bar may allow encroachments into the public right-of- way with an encroachment permit. Certain potential hazards or liabilities may be permitted when the owner expressly states in writing that he indemnifies and holds the City, its employees, etc. harmless against all claims for any accident, loss, etc. Further, the owner shall be required to maintain liability insurance policy (considering the minimum amount of $1,000,000) and name the City, its employees, etc., as co-insured and if the policy is allowed to lapse the owner shall immediately remove the encroachment and restore the area to its original condition at his cost. Additionally, a bond may be required to insure compliance with the provisions of the of the encroachment permit. The encroachment permit and agreement shall be recorded against the property with the County of Los Angeles. Obtaining an encroachment permit and all of these requirements pertaining to an encroachment permit shall be a part of this project's conditions of approval. LANDSCAPING Preliminary landscape information was delineated on the preliminary grading plan. The applicant is required to submit a final landscape along with an irrigation plan for the City's review and approval prior to the issuance of any City permits. Staff feels that plants and trees are an integral part of this project because 'it will help soften the massive appearance of structures. The final landscape plan shall delineate the species, size and quantity of all plant materials including plant materials utilized for the slopes. All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed prior to the project's final inspection or Certificate of occupancy issuance. CONCLUSION In closing, staff completed a review of the proposed project and feels it is necessary to continue this project to a future public hearing date to allow the applicant time to submit a re- designed project. The proposed project challenges the City's Design Guidelines, thus making it difficult for staff to recommend an approval for this project. One of the main issues includes the overall massive appearance of the proposed single family residence, which makes it incompatible with the surrounding neighborhood. moreover, the project site requires an extensive e . ngineering and soils review. The applicant's 7 preliminary soils report is being evaluated by the City's soils engineer. In fact, the City's soils engineer provided a list of comments that question the project site's slope stability. Although, the applicant anticipates these engineering issues can be resolved, the applicant has not yet addressed any of these comments. Thus, staff is concerned that the feasibility of this project may still be questioned. With respect to this application request, the Planning Commission has the option to do the following: 1. Direct staff to prepare a resolution of approval with or without conditions 2. Direct staff to continue this project to a future public hearing date in order to allow the applicant time to submit a re -designed project. 3. Direct staff to prepare•a resolution of denial. OTHER DIVISIONS' REVIEW: The Public Works Division and Building and Safety Division reviewed this project. Their recommendations are included as conditions of approval in the draft resolution. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: This item has been advertised in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on January 31, 2001. Notices were mailed to approximately 249 property owners within a 500 -foot radius of the project site on January 31, 2001. A notice of public hearing on a display board measuring at least 4 foot by 6 foot was posted at the project site on February 2, 2001 and displayed for at least 10 days before the public hearing. Also, a notice of public hearing was posted at three public places on January 31, 2001. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section 15303(a)-, the City has determined that this project is Categorically Exempt. 8 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue Development Review No. 2000-22 to a future public hearing date to allow the applicant time to submit a,re-designed project. REQUIRED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FINDINGS: 1. The design and layout of the proposed development are consistent with the General Plan, development standards of the applicable district, design guidelines, and architectural criteria for special areas (e.g. theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards or planned developments); 2 The design of the proposed development will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards; 3. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain and enhance the harmonious orderly and attractive development contemplated by this Chapter, the General Plan, or any applicable specific plan; 4. The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture and color, and will remain aesthetically appealing; 5. The proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious (e.g., negative affect on property values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 6. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).-- Prepared by: Sonya J4, DeVelopment Services Assistant 0 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Resolution of Approval; 2 Exhibit "A" - site plan, floor plan, elevations, cross sections, landscape plan, preliminary grading plan, slope analysis, color/materials board dated February 13, 2001; 3. Applications; and 4. Tree Preservation Statement. 10 CITY OF }"" AMOND BAR COAVAUNE, DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 21660 E. Copley Drive Suite 190 TAT' (909)396-5676 Fax (909)861-3117 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION Record Owner Applicant Name 4 M A RA L /-tom It A►JA- (List name first) Address Case,; FPL # - Deposit S Receipt# By Date Rec'd Applicant's Agent (Last name first) (Last name first) 7,27 a/7e,4 A4. 4&4/y i g SO S • l�wy l7 3 su7c p- 0.8gA 7/ Zip q i 1 to s" 9 1-7 . 6.+Ile An4ac ✓A�f-!) e/4 F z.3 s".2, Phone") S9 k- fY33 Phone(Fog) S9�- /y33 Phone(ga9} 337— P71,F- � q 6 337 - 37? 1-7 It is the applicant's responsibility to notify the Community Development D' for to wfiting of any change of the principals involved during the processing of this case. • _ (Attach a separate sheet, if necessary, including names, addresses, and signatures of members of partnerships, joint ventures, and directors of corporations.) Consent: I c fy that am the owner of the _e htze' s described property and permit the applicant to file this request. Signed ® ---- Date /Oz/ OZo . (All record owners) Certification: I, the undersigned, hereby certify under penalty of pedury that the information herein provided is correct to the best of my knowledge. Print Name zw—w41 i b,l/1�d,r4Af t -Aes.;d t',✓7; (Applicant or Agent) Sign L- Date /O// a , o a G- (Applicantor Agent) Location / .2 t3© C14;50eA4 Olt.dlMOWb &I -n e;4 9/ 6s` '7/WrKA-6. 37.973 (Street address or tract and lot number) Zoning L A &&1A HNM -� Previous Cases Present Use of Site V /-k-C.v4 NT It CS i .ter i-&; a4'1...._ Use applied -for r_ --2 S'-7� 01-1 o t— A 5 EL� An application for Development Review is required for any and all commercial, industrial, institutional development, and any residential project which proposes five dwelling units or more (detached or attached) and which involves the issuance of a building permit for construction or reconstruction of a structure(s) which meets the following criteria: 1. New construction on vacant property; 2. Structural additions to new buildings which are equal to fifty percent of the floor area of an existing on-site building(s), or have a minimum ten thousand square feet in gross floor area; 3.- Reconstruction projects which are equal to fifty percent of the floor area of existing on-site building(s);-or have aminimum ten thousand square feet in gross floor are; 4. Projects involving a substantial change or intensification of land use, such as, but not limited to, the conversion of an existing building to a restaurant, or the conversion of a residential structure to an office or commercial use. 5. Residential, commercial, industrial, or institutional projects proposed upon a decending slope abutting a public street. ALL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATIONS SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: /A. A detailed site plan, floor plans and elevations showing: 1. Dimensions and orientation of the parcel with the scale clearly indicated. 2. Location of buildings, structures and signs, both existing and proposed. 3. Location of cave overhang and architectural features. 4. Location of landscaping and irrigation, both existing and proposed. 5. Grading Plans, including earthwork calculations. '-B. Development Review requires 15 full sized folded copies and 30 reduced (8th x 11) of each 'I -C. All building elevations including signage. D. Indicate types and colors of all exterior construction materials with a materials board. Include a colored rendering of the proposal (both maximum size 8"x14"). E. Location of all walls and fences, their height and materials of construction. ___F. Copies of any and all CC&R's applicable to the development or use of the land. G. Any other architectural and engineering data as may be required to permit a complete investigation of the proposal. /H. '?00' land use radius map. T00' property ownership map. ✓I. 2 sets of gummed mailing labels for all property owners within the 300' radius (including applicant and/or applicant's agents). Number all lots and cross reference with labels. Include a photocopy of all labels. J. Photographs of site and key diagram. K. Oak tree statement. L. 2 copies of a Title Report that is less than 30 days old. THE MATERIALS HEREWITH BEING SUBMITTED DO NOT CONSTITUTE A COMPLETE FILING OR AN ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY. Within 30 days fmm the date noted on the fee receipt, the applicant or his agent will be mailed a statement notifying him if additional materials or information are needed. It should also be noted that additional environmental material/ data may be required before project processing can begin and a public hearing meeting scheduled. The results of the stafrs environmental review (Initial Study) will be sent to you as soon as possible. AT THE TIME THE INITIAL STUDY IS COMPLETED, YOU WILL ALSO BE INFORMED OF ANY ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL FEES REQUIRED. Questions regarding the Initial Study should be directed to the Diamond Bar Planning Division. Additional information may be requested by the Planning Division in order to complete the processing of this application. Revised 7197' 1 [� The subject property contains no oak, walnut, sycamore, willow, or naturalized California Pepper trees. [ ] The subject property contains one or more oak, walnut, sycamore, willow, or naturalized California Pepper trees. The applicant anticipates that no activity (grading and/or construction) will take place within five (5) feet of the outer dripline of any oak, walnut, sycamore, willow, or naturalized California Pepper tree. [ ] The subject property contains one or more oak, walnut, sycamore, willow, or naturalized California Pepper trees. The applicant states that activity (grading and/or construction) will take place within five (5) feet of the outer dripline of any oak, walnut, sycamore, willow, or naturalized California Pepper tree. A Tree Permit has been or will be applied for prior to any activity taking place on the property. ale b (Applicant's Signature; (Date) D:WORD-LJNDA\FORMS\TREE STATEMENT a NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PROPOSED NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE FOR DEVELOPER'S NAME PHONE NUMBER �{ FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR (909) 396-5676 v Please place a detailed Notice of Public Hearing here. You use a copy of the Notice of Public Hearing that is mailed to the surrounding property owners. Font size and lettering should be proportionate with the size of the sign. Post this sign at the project site at least 10 days before the public hearing. Take pictures of the sign once it is posted at the site. You will need to turn these pictures in to the City. The pictures will be retained as part of the applicant's file. ........................................... I cesaa aF��4���a�Q �n g H vv'S �8a -►�, tl l l l l as®a aSeB4�s°�S S,�9i' ea CO a e �4p� ; rn M �xp gSaa� u RC Gbbb@ vG GSyG G• v a aGl 9 ea ` a e �4p� ; rn s P y� g 9@�09R99eR0£9C9d9R&RP 4 Lis{��S a e �4p� ; � G gSaa� vG GSyG G• v Im r 0 m r m m r 'n r- J� I 11 - 0 0 m V > m z MAC h 601 W, N,6 P"UNIA-go THIP - I p J, -.1 HIrR R M- 'UN 41 P HO i q M' fi�P iMS 01, 1! w'malh 'gall h8N PRO RF W-1 �a w -----'--- ��FJj�� --- -" � -- :w u ------ --- - -_----111 M ---- I I -------- -----_---- --_---- --_--------- r ----x-411 ll -- -� --- - -- -_----�--_- ---_-- ------ =all _ _ --- � --- ---- ��,-_-ell - - -- --- ---- --111 --- ------sly---< --- ------ilk---'ll 9N rp U-�pcyyl�'tl q mp Amp ^:Ey Krri m rvi 0 s �o 0 G o90 9N rp U-�pcyyl�'tl q mp Amp ^:Ey Krri m rvi 0 'grv��uiw. n 4 ffiffill gin �jj jglygmaml dNO AM P r, 16�1, I 53 RIHM% U gig, I 9lz gin �jj jglygmaml dNO AM P r, 16�1, I 53 RIHM% U gig, I M R 4; 1> it 0) alb a m 1 313 1, Agq LLt-h 842- ism S'll, M m m r - m IS 07 fI 07 70 m > m m o < > 9 :6 � z co M1,51 FR' al i i NMI Tw T op got p X770 ik;F M1, i NMI 1, A op got p i NMI 1, A p X770 ik;F M1, i 1, A Nva S III e� g 14 + me S 9 ELI 5. -Q Im \�\ rm N a ;(§)§§§\\}\§((|\§§! p,tx \ \�\ � \]���\\_ \\�\�\ �� GENERAL PLAN/ZONING The project site is zoned Single Family Residential -Minimum Lot Size 40,000 Square Feet (R-1-40,000). Its General Plan Land Use designation is Rural Residential (RR) . Generally, the. following zones surround the subject site: to the north, south, and east, are the R-1-40,000 Zone and to the west is the R-1-8,000. ANALYSIS: REVIEW AUTHORITY Pursuant to the Development Code, the Planning Commission is the hearing officer for this Development Review request. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW: The purpose of Development Review is to establish consistency with the General Plan through the promotion of high aesthetic and functional standards to compliment and add to the economic, physical, and social character of the City. The process will also ensure that new development and intensification of existing development yields a pleasant. living, working, or shopping environment and attracts the interest of residents, workers, shoppers, and visitors as the result of consistent exemplary design. Pursuant to Development Code Section 22.48.020, an application for Development Review is required for residential projects that propose new construction on a vacant parcel and new structures, and reconstruction projects which are equal to 50 percent or greater of the floor area of existing structures on the site, or have a minimum 10,000 square feet of combined gross floor area. The proposed residential project involves the construction of one dwelling unit with a combined gross floor area of about 13,105 square feet. Therefore, Development Review'is required. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The following is a comparison of the City's development standards and the project's newly proposed development standards:; City's Development Stdndards Project's Development Sta dards 1. Setbacks: 1. Setbacks: front yard minimum 30, front yard - 261from property 2 from property line; Line,; side yards 7 minimum 10' and side yards - 10' and 15' 15, from property line; from property line; rear yard - minimum 20.' rear yard 20' plus prom from property line. property line. Setbacks may be decreased no *Applicant.is requesting a- more than 20 percent with a Minor Variance approval Minor Varianc'e approval. for the front yard setback, which is a 20 percent decrease. 2. Building Height: - maximum 35 2. Building Height: - maximum 35'. 3. Parking: Minimum 2 car 3. Parking: one (1) three car garage. garage that has a 22, 6" depth and 31, width and one (1) single Minimum 20' depth and 10, width car garage with a 20' depth and for each vehicle bay. -a 11' 6" width. There are a total of 4 car spaces provided. 4. Retaining walls: maximum 61 4. Retaining walls: walls exposed height. are no higher than 6' in height. ARCHITECTURE The proposed projec-t site is within the gated community identified as "The Country Estates". These homes located within this community are typically large in size with surrounding homes that average between'5,000 square feet and 10,000 square feet. More recent re.sidential developments have been 10,000 square feet or more. . This proposed project includes approximately 7,,885 square feet of living area (a combined area of 13,105 square feet). Nonetheless, -the proposed single family residence is appropriate in mass and scale to the site on which it is placed. More significantly, the recesses of stories help break up. the massive appearance. The rear elevation design terraces down the hillside and as a result, maintains more characteristics of the hillside. Additionally, staff reviewed the proposed project's architectural style, which is contemporary and modern. it appears to be compatible with the eclectic architectural style of other homes within "The Country Estates". Furthermore, the -applicant has received approval- by "The Country Estates" architectural committee. The following materials and colors 3 will be utilized: stucco- La Habra X-17 Misty/Base 200, decorative iron work - Natural Rusted Faux Finish, window frames and trim - Millguard or Sim. Dark Bronze anodized aluminum finish, sloped roofing - fire free quarry slate (Autumn blend with 40% Chestnut, 40% Taupe, and 2.0% Green -Grey) by RE -CON Building Products, flat roofing - Sandalwood Beige Mer-Kote Weather Decking, concrete finish and decking - Asher Slate Stamped Concrete Chemical Stained Finish including Scofield CD -15, Antique Amber and CS-11,,Fern Green. The proposed single family structure consists of three stories. The lower level contains an entertainment room with a bar, cellar and humidor, gym, gym bathroom and sauna, closets, indoor pool, and lower outside deck area. The mid level floor plan contains four bedrooms (each with an adjacent bathroom) , master bedroom, master bathroom, master closet, laundry room, hallways, and three -car garage. The upper level contains a foyer, bathroom, family room, kitchen, dining area, formal living room, study room with an adjacent bathroom, and a single car garage. GRADING/SOILS The project site does not contain a buildable pad. The applicant proposes a design in which the single family residence will terrace down the hillside, thereby minimizing the amount of grading needed. This project will require earthwork quantities of approximately 10 cubic yards for cut and approximately 1,010 of import for fill. It is anticipated that the grading and the requirements for a permit. The soils report includes recommendations to There are no outstanding issues related at the present time. As a condition -of shall submit a grading plan and soils review and approval prior to the issuance 4 soils review will meet applicant's preliminary ensure proper grading. to grading and/or soils approval, the applicant report to the City, for of any permits. LANDSCAPING A preliminary landscape/ irrigation plan was submitted with this project's application. However, it is required the applicant submit a final landscape/ irrigation plans prior to the issuance of any City permits, reflecting the landscaping guidelines and restrictions set forth in the Development Code. The landscape plan shall delineate planting materials' type, color, size, quantity, and location for the City's review and approval. In this case, the applicant has proposed a. variety of plant materials. However, the size and quantity is a concern by staff. Staff feels that plants and trees are an integral.p art of this project because it will help soften the massive appearance of structures.. The landscape/ irrigation plan fdr the entire lot will be a condition of approval for this proposed project. It will be required that a landscape/ irrigation be installed prior to Planning Division's final inspection of the single family dwelling unit. MINOR VARIANCE: The City of Diamond 'Bar Development Code requires a 30' front yard setback as measured from the property line. Pursuant to Section 22.52 of the Development Code, a Minor Variance is required to allow for a decrease of no more than 20 percent, in the required setback.. The applicant is proposing a.26, front yard setback. The reduced setback was intended to help improve the overall project to help further lessen the impact of structures o ' n the rear portion of the single family residence. Furthermore, the lot does not contain a.flat buildable pad., Due to the project site's topography, the installation of retaining walls is needed to create.a buildable pad. - A substantial number of homes located in the same vicinity have a 2-01 setback. The applicant is one of the last single family residences to• be developed in this tract. Without a Minor Variance approval, the applicant is denied the same enjoyment and privileges, which other neighboring single family residences— in the same zoning district possess with similar topographic features. i OTHER DIVISION'S REVIEW The Public Works Division and Building and Safety Division reviewed this project. Their recommendations will be conditions of approval in the draft resolution.. 5 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: This item has been advertised in the San Gabriel. Valley Tribune and the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on February 26, 1999. Notices were mailed to 56 property owners within a 500 -foot radius of the project site on January .30, 2001. A notice of public hearing on a display board measuring at least 4 foot -by 6 foot was posted at the project site on February 2, 2001 and displayed for at least 10 days before the public hearing. Notices were also posted at three public places within the project's vicinity. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The environmental evaluation shows that the proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to the guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15303 (a). RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that the Deputy City Manager approve Development Review No. 2000-23., Findings of Fact, and conditions as listed within the attached draft resolution. REQUIRED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FINDINGS: 1. The design and —layout of the proposed development are consistent with the General Plan, development standards of the applicable district, design• guidelines, and architectural criteria for special areas (e.g. theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards or planned developments); 2. The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards; 3. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain and enhance the harmonious, orderly, and attractive development contemplated by this Chapter, the General Plan, or any applicable specific plan; 4. The design of the proposed development will not be detrimental — to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious (e.g. negative affect on property values or 0 resale (s) of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 5. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). REQUIRED MINOR VARIANCE FINDINGS4. 1. There are special circumstances applicable to the property (e.g. location, shape, size, surroundings, topography, or other conditions), so that the strict application of this Development Code denies the property owner privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zoning districts or creates an unnecessary and non -self- created, hardship or unreasonable regulation which make it obviously impractical to require compliance with the development standards; 2. Granting the Minor Variance.is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other property owners in the same vicinity and zoning district and denied to the property owner for which the Minor Variance is sought; 3 Granting the Minor Variance is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan; 4. The proposed entitlement would not be detrimental to the public interest, -health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City; and 5. The proposed entitlement has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the.California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Prepared by: Sonya pe, OeTelopment Services Assistant 7 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Resolution of Approval; 2. Exhibit "A" - site plan, floor plan, elevations, cross sections, preliminary landscape plan, dated February 1.3, 2001; 3. Application; 4 . Tree Preservation Statement; and 5. Materials/Color Board. E PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -XX A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 2000-23 AND MINOR VARIANCE 2001-01, AND CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, AN APPLICATION REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A THREE STORY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE OF APPROXIMATELY 13,105 SQUARE FEET- WITH GARAGE AREAS THAT WILL ACCOMMODATE FOUR CARS AND REAR DECK. THE REQUEST IS ALSO FOR A REDUCED FRONT YARD SETBACK. THE PROJECT SITE IS LOCATED AT 1621 DERRINGER LANE (LOT 10 OF TRACT NO..24046). A. Recitals 1. The property owner, Elie Abinader has filed an application for Development Review No. 2000-23 and Minor Variance No. 2001-01 as described above in the title of this resolution. Hereinafter. in this Resolution, the subject Development Review and Minor Variance shall be referred to as the "Application". 2. On February 13, 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar, conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 3. On January 31, 2001, notification of the public hearing for this project had been published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers. On January 30, 2001, notices were mailed to 56 property owners within a 500 -foot radius of the project site. On February 2, 2001, a notice of public .hearing on a display board measuring at least 4 foot by 6 foot was posted at the project site and displayed for at least 10 days before the hearing. Notices were also posted at three public places within the project's vicinity. B. Resolution Now, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Deputy City Manager of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: 1. The Planning Commission hereby specifically all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, this Resolution are true and correct. IN i�'AN f.,ft 44.,, ", ht Pft '� I finds that Part A, of 2. The Planning Commission hereby determines that the project identified above in this resolution is Categorically exempt--- from --- the - requirements- of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and guidelines set forth thereafter, pursuant to Section 15303 (a) of Article 19 of Chapter 3, Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. . 3. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds and determines that, having considered the record as a whole including the findings set forth below, and changes and alterations which have been incorporated into and conditioned upon the propose ' d project set forth in the application, there is no evidence before the Planning Commission that- the project proposed herein will have the potential of an adverse effect on wild life resources or the habitat upon which the wild life depends. Based upon substantial evidence, this Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effects contained in Section 753.5 (d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth herein, the Planning Commission hereby finds as follows: a) The site is approximately 1.21 gross acres. The lot does not contain a flat buildable pad and the lot slopes down toward the rear. The project site does not contain.any easements or restricted use areas. b) The project site is zoned Single Family Residential - Minimum Lot Size 40,000 Square Feet (R-1-40,000). It has a General Plan Land Use designation of Rural Residential (RR). c) Generally, the following zones surround the subject site,: to the, north, south, and east- is the R-1-40,000. Zone and to the west is the R-1-8,000 Zone. d)The proposed project is a request to construct a three story single family residence of approximately 13,105 square feet with garage areas that will accommodate 2 four cars and rear decks. The Minor Variance is required for a reduced front yard setback. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FINDINGS: e) The design and layout of the proposed development ' are consistent with the General Plan, . development standards of the applicable district, design guidelines, and architectural criteria for special areas, (e.g. theme areas, specific. plans, community plans, boulevards, planned developments); Tract Map No. 24046 was approved by Los_Angeles County on August 20, 1969 prior to the City of Diamond Bar's incorporation and sited for residential development. The proposed project complies with the elements of the adopted General Plan -of July .25, 1995, which has a land. use designation of Rural Residential (RR-1- du/acre) since the project site is 1.21 acres. Additionally, the proposed project complies with the City's General Plan -objectives and strategies related to maintaining the integrity of residential neighborhoods. The surrounding homes average between 5,000 and 10,000 square feet. This proposed project includes approximately 7,885 square feet of. living area (13,105 square feet of combined area). Thus, it meets the purpose and intent of the City's Design Guidelines. Furthermore, the proposed design and layout is compatible with the eclectic architectural style and design, materials and colors of existing homes within the surrounding area. It was approved by "The Country Estates" Architectural Committee. f) The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the . use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future development, and will not create traffic or'pedestrian hazards. The project site includes a single family, residence, which is similar in design and layout to the surrounding single family residences. As mentioned in Item (e), the proposed -single family residence is appropriate insizeand scale to the site on which its placed. It is not expected to unreasonably interfere ,with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. The project site is adequately served by Derringer Lane. This private street is designed to, handle minimum traffic created by this type of development. g) The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the character of the surrounding -neighborhood and will maintain and enhance the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by section 22.48.040 of the Development Code, the General Plan, or any applicable specific plan; The proposed project's architectural design appears to be compatible with the eclectic architectural style of other homes within "The Country Estates". As noted it Item (f)) the proposed single family residence is appropriate in size and scale to the site, which it's placed.. more significantly, the recesses of stories help break up. the massive appearance. The rear elevation design terraces down the hillside and as a result, maintains more characteristics of the hillside. Additionally, the colors and materials utilized appear to be compatible with the surrounding homes in the area. h) The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture and color, and will remain aesthetically appealing; As referenced in Item (g), the proposed project will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic.use of materials, texture, and color that will *remain aesthetically appealing while offering a low level of maintenance. The proposed project's architectural style is contemporary and modern. It is compatible with the eclectic architectural style of other homes within "The Country Estates". Additionally, the applicant has received approval by "The Country Estates" architectural.committee. i) The proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious (e.g. negative effect on property values or 4 resale(s) of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity; and City permits, inspections, and soils reports are required for construction to ensure that the finished product will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. j) The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provision's of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The City has determined that this project is categorically exempt pursuant to the guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15303(a). MINOR VARIANCE FINDINGS: k) There are special circumstances applicable to the property (e.g. location, shape, size, surroundings, topography, or other conditions), so that the strict application of this Development Code denies the property owner privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zoning districts or creates an unnecessary and non -self- created, hardship or unreasonable. regulation which make it obviously impractical to require compliance with the development standards; The lot does not contain a flat buildable pad. The development of a single family dwelling unit incorporates a hillside design that terraces down the hillside. With a minor variance approval, the applicant will be able to lessen the impact on the hillside. -Due to the topographic constraints of the lot, the applicant is denied the same privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity. A substantial number of homes located in the same vicinity have a 20, setback. The applicant is one of the last single family residences to be developed in this tract. Without a Minor Variance approval, the applicant is denied the same enjoyment and privileges, which other neighboring single family residences in the same zoning district possess with similar topographic features. 5 AIZ r7l 1) Granting the Minor Variance is necessary --for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other property owners in the same vicinity and zoning district and denied to the property owner for which the Minor Variance is sought; Prior to December 3, 1999, the City of Diamond Bar followed development standards adopted by the County of Los Angeles. These development standards allowed a 20' front yard setback. The applicant is one of the last single family residences to be developed in this tract. Therefore, granting the Minor Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial rights possessed by other property owners. m) Granting the Minor Variance is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan; The development is consistent with the General Plans land use designation of Rural Residential (RR) . The single family residence is designed to terrace down the hillside and as a result, maintains more characteristics of the hillside as prescribed in the City's Design Guidelines. Nevertheless, the appearance of the single family residence as seen from the rear elevation is less massive. n) The pr-oposed entitlement would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City; and City permits., inspections, and soils reports are required for construction to ensure that the finished product will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or. welfare, or- materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. o) The proposed entitlement has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The City has determined that this project. is categorically exempt pursuant to the guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15303(a). I 4. Based upon the findings and conclusion- set forth above, the Planning Commission. hereby approves this Application subject to the following conditions: a) The project shall substantially conform to site plan, floor plans, elevations, cross sections,. preliminary landscape plan and materials/colors board collectil7-e!�, labeled as Exhibit "A" dated February 13, 2001 as submitted to and approved by the Planning Commission, and amended herein. b) The subject site shall be maintained in a condition, which is free of debris both during and after the construction, addition, or implementation of the entitlement granted herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether during or subsequent to construction shall be done only by the property owner, applicant, or by duly permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste from residential, commercial, construction, and industrial areas within the City. It shall. be the applicant's obligation to insure that the waste contractor utilized has obtained permits from the City of Diamond Bar to provide such services. c) Before construction begins, the applicant shall install temporary construction fencing pursuant to the Building --..and Safety Division's requirements along the project site's perimeter.-. This fencing shall remain until the Building official approves its removal. The applicant -shall also provide proper sanitation facilities while under construction. d) The applicant shall submit a grading plan prepared by a Civil Engineer, licensed by the State of California, which delineates the following: 1) Cut and fill quantities andcalculations; 2) All flow lines, finished surfaces, and finished 'grades; 3) Proper drainage with detailed sketches; and 4) Proposed and existing grades; I e)The grading plan shall indicate top of wall, finished surface, top of footing for all retaining walls. f Prior to the issuance of City permits, a soils report prepared by a Geotechnical Engineer, licensed by. the State of California, shall be required. The soils report shall reference the suitability of the retaining wall to withstand pressures of the retained soils; g)Any impact of the new structure on the sewage capacity shall be reviewed and approved by the City. h) The single family structure shall meet the 1998 California Building Code, California Plumbing Code, California mechanical , Code and the 199 National Electric Code requirements. i) The minimum design wind pressures shall be 80 miles per hour & "C" exposure. j) This single family home is located in "Fire Zone 4" and shall meet all requirements of the fire zone: 1) All roof covering shall be "Fire Retardant". Tile roofs shall be fire stopped at the eaves to preclude entry of the flame or members under the fire. 2) All unenclosed under floor areas shall be constructed as exterior wall. 3) All openings into the attic, floor and/or other enclosed areas shall be covered with corrosion - resistant wire mesh not less than 1/4 inch nor more than 1/2 inch in any dimension except where such opening's are equipped with sash or door. 4) Chimn'eys shall have spark arrestors of maximum 1/2 inch screen.. k) This residence shall- meet the State Energy Conservation Standards. 1) Surface water shall drain away from building ding at a 2% minimum slope. m) The applicant shall obtain a separate permit for all proposed retaining walls. n) Applicant shall obtain Fire department approval, which is required due to the project location. o) All structures located within -the front yard setback area shall not exceed 42" in height. p) A final landscape/ irrigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to Planning Division's final inspection. The landscape plan shall be designed to lessen the visual impact of the - retaining walls. - The applicant shall work C. staff regarding the appropriate, size, number, type, andspecies(i.e. trees, shrubs, groundcover) q) The p- a plicant shall provide all necessary cross . sections and additional elevations, which clearly indicate the proposed single family structure does not exceed 35, in height on their structural plans to be submitted to the Building and Safety Division. r) The applicant shall comply with Planning and Zoning and Building and Safety, and Public Works Divisions, and Fire Department requirements. s) This grant is valid for two (2) years and shall be exercised (i.e. construction) within that period. or this grant shall expire. A one (1) year extension may be requested in writing and submitted to the City 30 days prior to this grant's expiration date. t) If the Department . o . f Fish and Game determines that Fish and Game Code Section 711.2 applies to the approval of this project, then the applicant shall remit to 'the City a cashier's check, payable to the County Clerk, in the amount of $25.00 for -a documentary handling fee in connection with Fish and Game Code requirements. Furthermore, if this project is not exempt from a filing fee imposed pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section - 711.4 because the project has more than a deminimus impact on fish and wildlife then the applicant shall also pay to the Department of Fish and Game any such *f ee and any fine which the Department determines to be owed. I The Planning Commission shall,: a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of tr— Resolution, by certified mail to the property -owner, Elie Abinader, 1418 East 33rd Street, Signal Hill, CA 90807. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS THE 13th DAY OF FEBRUARY 2001 BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. I, James DeStefano., Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted at a regular meeting for Administrative Development Review held on the 13th day of February, 2001. BY: James DeStefano, Secretary a CITY OF DIAM TD BAR COMMUNITY DE'Vi:.LOPMENT DEPARTMENT 21660 E. Copley Drive Suite 190 (909)396-5676 Fax (909)861-3117 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION Record Owner Applicant Name iV�INPUC>Ef- A9>11vA-D&1Z- (Lut name fust) (Last rime first) Address I ii I F7 F—, Case# FPL # Deposit S Receipt# By Date Rec'd Applicant's Agent (Last name first) C A- z -17 Phone( hone( Phone N6TE: It is the applicant's responsibility to notify the Community Development Director in writing of any change of the principals involved during the processing of this case. .(Attach a separate sheet, if necessary, including names, addresses, and signatures of members of partnerships, joint ventures, and dit=tor-s of corporatioAs.) Consent. I certify that I am the owner of the herein described property and permit the applicant to file this request. Date (cr)- C-) (All record Certification: 1, the undersigned, . hereby cerWfy under penalty of perjury that the information herein provided is correct to the best of my knowledge. Print Nam (Applicant or Agent) Signed (N Date \1/ (Applicant or Agent) Location I b;?, I - - - 3> F -P- LN 6SIP— ((D+ �bW A/0LA046 (Street address- or tract andlot number) Zoning Previous Cases Present Use of Site V y- -, -A z11/ - Use applied for %c; - REQUIREME DEVEi f3PMENT REVIEW A_PPL.I ATION An application for Development Review is required for any imd all commercial, .industrial, institutional development, and any residential project which proposes five dwelling units or more (detached or attached) and which involves the issuance of a building permit for construction or reconstruction of a structure(s) which meets the following criteria: 1. New construction on vacant property; 2. Structural additions to new buildings which are equal to fifty percent of the floor area of an existing on-site building(s), or have a minimum ten thousand square feet in gross floor area; 3.. __ _ Recaastrtuctioa _.__.___ _ . projects which are equal to fifty percent of the area of existing on-site_ building(s), or have a minimum ten thousand square feet in gross floor am; 4. Projects involving a substantial change or intensification of land use, such as, but not limited to, the conversion of an existing buikling to a restaurant, or the conversion of a residential structure to an office or commercial use. 5. Residential, commercial, industrial, or institutional projects proposed upon a decending slope abutting a public street. ALL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATIONS SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: A. A detailed site plan, floor plans and elevations showing: 1. Dimensions and orientation of the parcel with the scale clearly indicated. 2. Location of buildings, structures and signs, both existing and proposed. 3. Location of cave overhang and architectural features. 4. Location of landscaping .and irrigation, both existing and proposed. 5. Grading Plans, including earthwork calculations. B. Development Review requires 15 full sized folded copies and 30 reduced (8 1h x 11) of each C. All building elevations including signage: D. Indicate types and colors of all exterior construction materials with a materials board. Include a colored rendering of the proposal (both maximum size 8"x14'). E. Location of all walls and fences, their height and materials of construction. F. Copies of any and all CC&R's applicable to the development or use of the land. G. Any other architectural and engineering data as may be required to permit a complete investigation of the proposal. ---:H. goo' land use radius map. X00' property ownership map. I. 2 sets of gummed mailing labels for all property owners within the 300' radius (including applicant and/or applicant's agents). Number all lots and cross reference with labels. Include a photocopy of all labels. J. Photographs of site and key diagram. K. Oak tree statement. -L. 2 copies of a Title Report that is less than 30 days old. THE MATERIALS HEREWITH BEING SUBMITTED DO NOT CONSTITUTE A COMPLETE FILING OR AN ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY. Within 30 days from the date noted on the fee receipt, the applicant or his agent will be mailed a statement notifying him if additional materials or information are needed. It should also be noted that additional environmental material/ data maybe required before project processing can begin and a public hearing meeting scheduled. The results of the staff's environmental review (Initial Study) will be sent to you as soon as possible. AT THE TIME THE INITIAL STUDY IS COMPLETED, YOU WILL ALSO BE INFORMED OF ANY ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL FEES REQUIRED. Questions regarding the Initial Study should be directed to the Diamond Bar Planning Division. Additional information may be requested by the Planning Division in order to compkie the processing of this application. Revised 7197 TREE PRESERVATION STATEMENT _ [ ] The subject property contains no oak, walnut, sycamore, willow, or. naturalized California Pepper trees. The subject property contains one or more oak, walnut, sycamore, willow, or naturalized California Pepper trees. The applicant anticipates that no, activity (grading and/or construction) will take place within five (5) feet of the outer dripline of any oak, walnut, sycamore, willow, or naturalized California Pepper tree. [ ] The subject property contains one or more oak, walnut, sycamore, willow, or naturalized California Pepper trees. The applicant states that activity (grading and/or construction) will take place within five (5) feet of the outer dripline of any oak, walnut, sycamore, willow, or naturalized California Pepper tree. A Tree Permit has been or will be applied for prior to any activity taking place on the property. D:WORD-LiNDA\FORMS\TREE STATEMENT (Date) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PROPOSED NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE FOR DEVELOPER'S NAME PHONE NUMBER y FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 1 (909) 396-5576 m Please place a detailed Notice of Public Hearing here. You use a copy of the Notice of Public Hearing that is mailed to the surrounding property owners. Font size and lettering should be proportionate with the size of the sign. Post this sign at the project site at least 10 days before the public hearing. Take pictures of the sign once it is posted at the site. You will need to tum these pictures in to the City. 'The pictures will be retained as part of the applicant's file. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR I COMMUNITY DEVELOPbfEN I DEPARTMENT 21660 E. Copley Drive Suite 190 (909)396-5676 Fax (909)861-3117 VARIANCE APPLICATION Record Owner — FRohT Y,44b S57 -94c< Applicant FPL # Deposit S ,r - Receipt# By Date Recd Applicant's Agent NameWtgDEX_ EICE_ fAE NAR EJ?z F—U"IE,,, . (Last name first) (Last name first) (Last name first) Address l&a I i.41, �ftpD r_—_ i"4 -h S1-AJ/(1 City D # 4 i" � (.Lvo 3#44L zi�_ 9r6 S ' -- Phone( ) CA go 7 Phone6014b _o v Cd -3) 13 X331 Phone( ) NOTE: It is the applicant's responsibility to notify the Community Development Director in writing of any change of the principals involved during the processing of this case. (Attach separate sheet, if necessary, including names, addresses, and signatures of members of partnerships, joint ventures, and directors of/06rmrations.) Consent: certify that I am the owner of the herein described property and permit the applicant to A this request. Date (All record Certification: I, the undersigned, hereby certify under penalty of peoFury that the information herein provided is.-' correct to the best of my knowledge.. 2 Print N" e I C _ A L3 i -(V .1_L I-�"'� — (Applicant or Agent) Signed �s Date V (Applicant or A(gent) Location (Street address or tract and lot number) between and (Street) (street) Zoning HNM Project Size (gross acres) Project Density Previous Cases Present Use of Site \/A_ Cg2a14-- Lo Use applied for FI ZOV4 ,g ` S P_. {— '��'C��i � � t6 0 rN K (ef e VL2 .4�'on -5,7. _S Domestic Water Source Q (J t Vrm , k'' Company/District Method of Sewage Disposal 5 a.,k jT;��—' Sanitation District _ LQ , Cen L) Grading of Lots by Applicant? YES „% NO Amount (Show necessary grading design on site plan or tent. map) LEGAL DESCRIPTION (All ownership comprising the proposed lots/project). If petitioning for zone change, attach legal description of exterior boundaries of area subject to the change.) Project Site: / , -� Q C' Gross Area No. of Lots Area devoted to : Structures Residential project: O O O and Grose Area No. of floors Proposed Density Units/Acres Number and types of Units Residential Parldng: Type Required Provided Total Required Total Provided INSTRUCTIONS: VARIANCE APPLICATION The information requested mart be completed for all Variance applications. The second half of the form identifies the various specific types of application requests being made. Here, you may fill out just the pertinent sections. The detailed instructions which follow explain only those items not clearly self-evident or requiring greater arnplication. If there are any questions, please call (909) 396-5676. You may also obtain a counseling appointment on how to fill out the application by calling this number. 1. Complete and submit one copy of the Variance application. If a Variance is submitted with any number of other requests, submit the appropriate materials that accompany each request. 2. The Variance application form MUST either be signed by the owner(s) of the subject property or the application must present a statement signed by the property owner(s) giving him the right to file the case. Purchaser in Escrow is not acceptable. A planner will assist you in filling in the following information. 3. Zone may be identified on the House Numbering Map. 4. HNM—House Numbering Map. 5. Use applied for • Describe the proposed project in detail --the nature of the business, occupation or purpose for which the structure or improvement or premises are to be used and what is to be done on or with the property in the way of additional improvements. Domestic water source and method of sewage disposal should specify type of source, name of service agency and district. 6. Legal Description: A separate complete legal description MUST be typed on or attached to EACH form requiring a legal description, that is Zoning Application, Certified Property Owners List Affidavit and plot plans. Provide a copy of the Title which should include any Conditions, Covenants & Restrictions (CC&R's). 7. Burden of Proof. Complete and submit the "Burden of Proof' statement. The answers to all questions must be complete. "Yes" and "No" answers are NOT acceptable. 8. Land Use Vicinity Maps:-- One full size blue print of 700' radius land use map (folded no larger than 8" x 14" with the location of the subject property on the front). Include 30 reduced copies (reduced to 81h x 11). Maps are to be the scale of one (1) inch to 100 feet, (except for very large areas requiring a map of more than 9 square feet) showing the subject property and all surrounding uses, streets, highways, alleys, rights -of ways,and lot cuts. Include tract and lot numbers. Outline subject property on all copies of the map. A margin should be left around the edges of the map after drawing the 700 foot radius. 9. All vicinity maps and plot plans must be properly identified and individually folded to measure no larger than 8' x 11' with the location of the subject property on the front. Submit 15 full size blueprints of site plans (calling out materials and including position of lighting) or tract maps, elevations (north, east, west, & south), landscape plans and 30 reduced copies of the above items (reduced to VA" x 11 "). 10. Surrounding �roperty Owners: Two full size blue prints of 500' radius surrounding property owners (folded no larger than 8" x 14'). Provide completed Ownership list, certified to be correct by affidavit, and two (2) separate sets of self adhesive address labels indicating surrounding property owners' names and addresses from the latest assessment roll (typed). Include the names and addresses of the applicant and agents. ALL LABELS SHALL. BE CROSS REFERENCED TO PROPERTY OWNERS' MAP AND LIST. 11. Occupant Load: In addition to the required plot plans one copy of a floor plan layout is required when the Proles request reqs parking other than for general commercial or industrial uses (theaters, restaurants, bars, and other places of public assembly). The floor plan must be accompanied by a stamped and signed "Application for Determination of Assembly Area Occupant Load for Parking Requirement ]Purposes•" 12. Initial Study: The California Environmental Quality Act requires a review of your proposed project for possible environmental impacts. This Initial Study process is intended to determine the type of environmental documentation necessary to have your project considered by the City. The Initial Study consists of a completed questionnaire and other material which you must provide, and an analysis of potential impacts prepared by staff—often with the input from reviewing agencies with special expertise. This process can be expedited with your cooperation. See Instructions for Completing Initial Study Questionnaire. 1. Environmental Information Form for Residential Projects: Complete this along with the Initial Study. This information will be reviewed to prepare the Environmental Determination. The rear portion of this form is for staff use only. 13. Project Maps: Submit 12 full size sets of plans. The overall dimensions of the maps should not exceed 36" x 42". Maps shall be folded no larger than 8" x 14" with the project name and address showing on the front. L Include 30 reduced copies of the above items (reduced to 8 1/2" x 11 "). 2. Plans must be completely dimensioned with the scale clearly indicated. Orient the maps with North position toward the top of the page or clearly indicated. 3. Indicate address/legal description of the subject property on the plans. Indicate the applicant's name address and telephone number on the plans. 4. Show all property lines with a heavy dashed line. 5. Leave a 3" x 6" area blank on the plans. The set of plans should include: Site Plan: a. Show all existing and proposed buildings, structures, yards, driveways, height and number of stories for each structure on the subject property. b. Indicate street name(s), width, distance to center line and nearest cross street. C. Show the existing topography with slope meamu menta. d. If the project is proposed on any slope, show the Average Finished Grade (AFG) points of measurement. e. Designate the percent of slope on a separate plan by showing each slope range (0-10, 10- 25, 25.50, 50-100) with a different color. Include a legend. Elevation plans: a. Provide elevation plan (North, South, East & West) showing the height of structures with the AFG clearly indicated. b. Show cross section of each structure. C. Show any AFG calculations. 16. Filing Deposit: The case filing deposit must accompany the application. Make checks payable to the City of Diamond Bar. Consult Staff for exact deposit requirements 17. Complete Case: A case CANNOT be accepted for filing if any of the minimum required material stipulated is not complete and accurate. During the processing of the case additional material may be needed to clarify the case. 18. Public Hearing: You or your representative must be present at the public hearing and be prepared to testify in detail on your request THE MATERIALS HEREWITH BEING SUBMITTED DO NOT CONSTITUTE A COMPLETE FILING OR AN ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY. Within 30 days from the date noted on the fee receipt, the applicant or his agent will be mailed a statement notifying him if additional materials or information are needed. VARIANCE APPLICATION CHECKLIST A. Application B. Legal Description C. Burden of Proof D. Lend Use Vicinity Maps: one full size and 30 reduced copies E. Surrounding Property Owners: Map: two full size copies Ownership list: one Self-adhesive Labels: two sets F. Occupant Load G. Initial Study Photographs: two sets Plot plans where appropriate, with contours showing: 1. Grading for proposed buildable sites and access. 2. Location, species name, .size and condition of oak trees and other significant trees, or a letter indicating that no such trees are on the site. Environmental Information form H. Project Maps: 12 full size and 30 reduced copies of Site Plan Elevation Plan I. Filing Fee Revised 1195 Variance CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST ZONING CASE NO STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF DIAMOND BAR I, , declare under penalty of perjury, pursuant to Section 2015.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, that the attached list contains the names and addresses of all persons who are shown on the latest available assessment roll of the County of Los Angeles as owners of the subject property and as owning property within a distance of five hundred (500) feet from the exterior boundaries of property legally described as: Executed at California, this day of , Ig Signature INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING INITIAL STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE TO THE APPLICANT: The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a review of your proposed project for possible environmental impacts. This Initial Study process is intended to determine the type of environmental documentation necessary to have your project considered by the City. The Initial Study consists of a completed questionnaire and other material which you must provide and an analysis of potential impacts prepared by staff—often with the input from reviewing agencies with special expertise. This process can be expedited with your cooperation. The project file must include the following exhibits, which von must provide (check boxes are provided for your use): 1. Initial Study Questionnaire—In completing this questionnaire, all questions should be answered as completely as possible (attach extra pages if necessary). If requesting a Iand division, it should be anticipated that future development will take place, and the questionnaire completed accordingly. Preliminary grading and/or development concepts should be submitted, even if no immediate construction is anticipated. 2. Development Plan with Contours showing: a) the location and layout of the proposed development or possible pad location; b) native vegetation—including the location, spread, health and circumference (measured 4 1/2 feet above ground level) of any oak trees; and C) existing and proposed landscaping.. 3. Vicinity, Map of appropriate scale showing the subject property in relation to nearby streets and other significant physical features. Street maps (such as Thomas Guide) in urban areas or U.S.G.S. Quad. Sheets in rural areas should be used. (Quad Sheets area available at many map stones or from the Department of the interior Geologic Survey, 300 North Los Angeles Street, Room 7638, Los Angeles—this is the Federal Building in Los Angeles civic center.) 4. Photographs of the site, pad locations and surrounding area. An index map keyed to the photographs should be provided, showing the location and direction of each photograph. 5. Generalized land use map of appropriate scale for the project site and surrounding properties, with uses clearly labeled. Be certain that the project number(s) is on all material (e.g. maps, photographs, questionnaire). FAILURE TO SUBMIT ALL REQUESTED MATERIALS AND TO PROVIDE COMPLM QUESTIONNAIRE INFORMATION CAN RESULT IN DELAYS IN PROCESSING YOUR CASE. Staff Use Project No. INITIAL STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE Project Applicant (Owner): � �� �- ,ate 1�s►lA-pct- - NAME LA f00 u I -i- Si , ADDRESS Lo ay Is�1 V 33 yr9� HONE # A. GENERAL INFORMATION Project Representative: PHONE # 1. Action requested and project description: 2. Street location of project: { (o Z. ( D fi -+(Z; Gy 6Z i ,a & IZ.4M pay./ T) g ,4.1i _ erQ •�- 3a. Present use of site: \l A C ,# n/ -L LO -L 3b. Previous use of site or structures: 4. Please list all previous cases (if any) related to this project: Alon e 5. Other related permittapprovals required. fC�. Specify type and granting agency. %L 6. Am you planning future phases of this project?N If ea a 6 lain: f / Cs r 7 8. Project Area: Covered by structures, paving: Landscaping, open space: Total Area: Number of floors: 17 _ 9. Present zoning: 10. Water and sewer service: Domestic Public Water Sewers Does service exist at site? �Y) N If yes, do purveyors have capacity to meet demand of project and all other approved Projects? N N If domestic water or public sewers are not available, how will these services be provided? Residential Projects: 11. Number and type of units: 12. Schools: n���,„„ `, l What school districts) serves the property?_U0) h" O � -fr i C -Yo a L , ql3 t' C Are exis hool facilities adequate to mat project noesis? NO If not, what provisions will be made for additional classrooms? Non-Resi tial projects: 13. Distan to nearest residential use or sensitive use (school, hospital, etc.) 14. Number and" nd oor area of buildings: 15. Number of emplo ees and shifts: 16. ' Maximum employees shift: 17. Operating hours• 18. Identify any: End p Auc\., 19. Waste products `. Means of disposal Do project operations use, stone or produce hazardous substances such as oil, pesticides, chemicals, paints, or radioactive maten'ats? YES tO If yes, explain 20. - Do your operations require any pressurized tanks? YES If yes, explain J 21. . Identify any flammable, reactive or explosive materials to be located on-site. 22. Will delivery or shipment trucks travel through residential areas to reach the nearest highway? YES, NO If yes, explain B. ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION 1. Environmental Setting—Project Site a. Existing use/structures vACLI-81—L 2. b. Topography/slopes ( iia ` *c. Vegetation *d. Animals *e. Watercourses f. Cultural/historical resources g. Other Environmental Setting — Surrounding Area a. Existing uses structures (types, densities): b. Topography/slopes *c. Vegetation *d. Animals *e. Watercourses f.. Cultut-al/historical resources g. Other * Answers, are not required if the area does not contain natural. undeveloped land. 3. Are there any major trees on the site, including oak trees? YES NO If yes, type and number. 4. Will any natural watercourses, surface flow patterns, etc., be changed through project development?: YES NO If yes, explain: 5. Grading: Will the project require grading? NO If yes, how many cubic yards? Will it be balanced on-site? ( NO If not balanced, where will dirt be obtained or deposited? 6. Are there any identifiable landslides or other major geologic hazards on the property (including uncompacted fill)? YES If yes, explain: 7. Is the property located within a high fire hazard area (hillsides with moderately dense vegetation)? YES NO Distance, to nearest fire station: 8. Noise: Existing noise sources at site: Noise to be generated by project: Fumes: ' Odors generated by project: Could toxic fumes be generated? 9.. What energy -conserving designs or material will be used? CERTrRCATIOAT: Y hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits, present • the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of m.y ability. and that the facts, statements, and ormation presented are true and correct to the best of / my knowledge and belief. Date Signature For. 0 rn M 00 . 9 r I I Xj > > >➢ >➢ > > m to co m c) ZZZZ 5 > rn cn w E5 > > z . z M .E.2 E.L- m a 7A Y-jEO m � rn C5 p E5oon I I Xj > > >➢ >➢ > > m to co m c) ZZZZ 5 rn cn w E5 > > z . z M .E.2 E.L- m a m � rn C5 p E5oon z C5 to -n 00000 00 'In >0 Ei 6 0 pl 0 8 8 x 0 0 7, F7 m -n -a o a) E: cl) U) to m cr) m M Oom>< -0 a v.. > 0 0 0 m — > > ;rl > O r- G) G) mo C) mo M"U G) m cf) M U) -0 mm m m 0 > m >< r 0 r m m m T < m m r -4 ca Ul ca W r.0 T 0, m -4:tl w 0 r�? to cn cn W O 0) cn OD m (n (n w -1i cn cyl C) M cn al 00 0 0 0 c) (n ELIE ABINADER : 1621 DERRINGER LANE, DIAMDND BAR, CA., 91765 11 ELIE ASINADER : 1621 DERRINGER LANE, DIAMOND BAR, CA., 91765 Z 0 a 0 JOB NO: MUIR 0 CF - --- -------- EDGEOFF 45 ;3 140.00' DERRINGER LANE ---- - ------- 00 385.00' N21*17'33"E ELIJE ABINAI)ER: 1621 DERRINGER LANE, DIAMOND BAR, CA., 91765 O�nil { IN. 641E B1RWL J. JLC F�tA4Go --__amu/ _ 00 _ v ELIE ABINADER : 1621 DERRINGER LANE, DIAMOND BAR, CA., 91765 0 JOB NO: M921FA 0 m 0=0 FTTr AIZTMADW.P 1x91 DERRINGER LANE. DIAMOND BAR, CA., 91765 Lail 0 m1:111A 0 .y m I i i 1 I I 4yl 1 1 i 1 u. I 1 � i 1 1 1 i I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I i A9921fAi i( 1 1 4 1 I I 11 I pp 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 i 1 I II III: I I i I•ij ; I i i �. y Mores C l+i 1 i NIQuxMNo 1 i 1 1 1 G _ apm Z' 1'�I •.Cn Ijmo�{{ wNwMa 1 i I J I i 1 1 i 1 1 I i 1 1 i I 1 0 I 1 I I I i I Y MR R1NL I I. 1 r 1.✓jl__ IV16Z tN4 i i • 1 • 1 ' iLI5t0 WO 1 1 I 1 ' ,I 00 L i 1 F.T.M. ARTNADRR a 1621 DERRINGER LANE. DIAMOND BAR, CA., 91765 1 i 1 1 I 1 i i I� o log i 1 i i t 1 1 I I I I I i 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 ( - . -- i 1 1 1 - i— i I I I i I 1 I I 1 1 i i I 1 I ; 1 _ tri 9 1 t I 1 ll- tt I - i I I I I i 1 1 1 1 I I i 1 I 1 I I 1 I i i 1 , I I I i IE ABINADER : 1621 DERRINGER LANE, DIAMOND BAR, CA., 91765 rr iF APTNTAnFR • ts7t nFRRINrFR IANF nIAMOND RAR. CA..91765 I I 1 I I I I I i I I 1 I i I i 1 i 1 i 1 p I I � 1 1 1 1 I 6 i - 1 I 1 i i I 1 i 1 I i �� i 1 I �J• 1 I I I I i 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I 1 I i I I I 1 1 t I I 1 i i i 1 i i i I 1 i I I I 1 i 1 I i t i 1 11 i I I i' , i 1 i I 1 I i 1- I i I I I I t I I 1 i 1 I 1CID - 1 i 1 I I 1 1 1 i i I _- - 1i 4-L- _ i i 1 1 1 i 1 Ill_ r i 1 I 1 1 I � •. � �/'J I S�'i �f I I I 4f It `1 I Q 1 1 1 1 I 1 f 1 I I 1 1091 nEODMIP_m I AhIC nlAh4nMn RAP re 01791; 0 AMR 0 Egg 0 li, LLIL, L 0 0 00 ELIE ABINADER 1621 DERRINGER LANE, DIAMOND BAR, CA., 91765 F.r.rF ARTNe7nT.R . 1971 DFRRINGFR IANF_ DIAMOND BAR. CA.. 91765 II I 1 i 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I I i 1 I 1 I i ■C I I 1 I 1 i i I ( 1 I I 1 0 ; z�jOF,�Ctd Y✓zo•N'�t-4co m evn>o ; 1 ! amC 1t��ii 1 1 1 t 1 I WuwMn p4 i I 1 1 1 1 1 1 i I i 0 1 I I i i I i I I i RV .. MiE mtteE 11' RZ, I= ItAGW LNG J IZIIW MAG ' i I 1 1 1. I [ iWLW MAL 1 1 1 I I I 1 I i I I 00' 1 i 1 I 1 1 1 1 I FIXE, ARTNA DFR - 1621 DFRRINGFR PANE DIAMOND BAR. CA.. 917 I . O Z IIS I I z 1 m ' 1 1 � I O;I I Ij I, 1; I; " =1 't � 11 1 \ 1 , 0 JE61tA: „ \ 1 \ \ A99iifA 0 \ \ 1 \ I (F7t M 'aeSy* I 1 i i r � a I I 1 ' II I 1 i 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I I i 1 I 1 I i ■C I I 1 I 1 i i I ( 1 I I 1 0 ; z�jOF,�Ctd Y✓zo•N'�t-4co m evn>o ; 1 ! amC 1t��ii 1 1 1 t 1 I WuwMn p4 i I 1 1 1 1 1 1 i I i 0 1 I I i i I i I I i RV .. MiE mtteE 11' RZ, I= ItAGW LNG J IZIIW MAG ' i I 1 1 1. I [ iWLW MAL 1 1 1 I I I 1 I i I I 00' 1 i 1 I 1 1 1 1 I FIXE, ARTNA DFR - 1621 DFRRINGFR PANE DIAMOND BAR. CA.. 917 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: REPORT DATE: MEETING DATE: CASE/FILE NUMBER: APPLICATION REQUEST: City of Diamond Bar PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report 8.3 January 23, 2001 February 13, 2001 Administrative Development Review No. 2001-01/ Variance No. 2001-02 To construct a two-story single family residence with two two -car garages and balconies totaling to approximately 8,800 square feet, tennis court and retaining walls exceeding six feet in height. PROJECT LOCATION: 2888 Crystal Ridge Road (Parcel B, Vesting Tract No. 47850), Diamond Bar, CA 91765 PROPERTY OWNERS/APPLICANT: BACKGROUND: Diamond Bar West, LLC 3480 Torrance Boulevard, Suite # 300, Torrance, CA 90503 The property owner, Diamond Bar West, LLC is requesting approval of Administrative Development Review No. 2001-01 and Variance No. —2001-02 (pursuant to Code Section 22.48.020 B.1 in order to construct a two-story single-family residence with two two -car 0 garage and balconies for a total of approximately 8,800 square feet. The project request includes a tennis court and retaining walls exceeding the maximum height of six feet located within the rear and side yards; hence (pursuant to Code Section 22.54.020 D.) the request for Variance No. 2001-02. The project site ispartof a 50 -lot subdivision approved by the City Council on June 6, 1995. It is located at 2888 Crystal_ — Ridge Road, on the cul-de-sac where Crystal Ridge Road intersects Water Course Drive and adjacent to a gated community identified as "The Country Estates". The project site, a vacant lot, is approximately 44,821 square feet with a pad area of 16,420 square feet and pad elevation of 942.0 feet. Easements are located within the front portion of the lot adjacent to Crystal Ridge Road. These easements are for access purposes, public utility and services and sanitary sewer. This lot is somewhat triangular shaped and contains three slopes, one at the rear and sides that slopes down to the pad and one at the front that slopes down to Crystal Ridge Road. These slopes contain some vegetation, however the vegetation is not part of the mitigation monitoring plan. The project site has a General Plan land use designation of Rural Residential (RR) Maximum 1 DU/AC and zoning designation of Single Family Residence -Minimum Lot Size -20,000 Square Feet (R-1- 20,000). Generally, the following zones surround the project site: to the north is the R-1-20,000 Zone; to the south is the Agriculture (AG) Zone; to the east is the R-1-20,000 Zone; and to the west is the Single Family Residence -Minimum Lot Size 9,000 Square Feet (R-1-9,000) Zone. ANALYSIS: Development Review The City's Development Code sets forth a Development Review process that also incorporates an Administrative Development Review process. The purpose of this process is to establish consistency with the General Plan through the promotion of high aesthetic and functional standards to complement and add to the economic, physical, and social character of the City. The process will also ensure that new development and intensification of existing development yields a pleasant living, working, or shopping environment and attracts the interest of residents, workers, shoppers and visitors as the result of consistent exemplary design. Pursuant to Development Code Section 22.48.020 B.1, the proposed ,—project meets the criteria for the Administrative Development Review because it involves the construction of a new single family residence less than 10,000 square feet on a vacant parcel. OA The proposed residential project is on a vacant lot with a gross floor area of approximately 8,800 square feet. The Hearing Officer usually reviews this process. However, in this case due to the Variance application, the Planning commission is the review authority. In addition to complying with the City's Development Review process, the proposed project must comply with the conditions of approval for Vesting Tract Map No. 47850. A condition of approval for the tract map requires that residential dwelling units be submitted for the City's review pursuant to the requirements of the Development Review ordinance. The Development Review ordinance is incorporated into the City's Development Code. Development Standards The following is a comparison of the development standards set forth by the City through the map approval process and the project's proposed development standards. CITY/MAP DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS PROPOSED PROJECT'S DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Tract Map No. 47850 Tract map No. 47850 Parcel B Parcel B Setbacks: Minimum Setbacks: • Front yard - 25 ft. from property 0 Front yard - min. 28.25 ft. from line; property line; • Side yard - 10 & 15 ft. from pad's 0 Side yard - 32 & 77 ft. from pad's edge with 40 ft. between dwelling edge/property line with 44 ft. plus units; between'the dwelling unit of Parcel • Rear yard - 25 ft. from pad's edge;C; . Rear yard - 25 ft. from pad's edge/property line; Building Height: Building Height: • Two stories - maximum 35 ft.; • Two stories - 31.5 ft.; 3 Parking: • Two car garage - minimum; Accessory structures: • Accessory structures may be .permitted utilizing setbacks consistent with the residential zoning designation for the property at the time of permit issuance; Current Development Code - accessory structure' shall maintain same setbacks as the residential structure: 30 ft. front yard setback, 10 & 15 ft.. side yard setback and 20 ft. rear yard setback; Retaining Walls: o Not specifically addressed in the Tract Map conditions of approval; Current Development Code permits retaining walls with a maximum height of 6 ft.; Parking: • Two garages with two bays each for a total of 4 parking spaces, (one garage at 20.5 ft. by 20 feet; and the second garage at 21 ft. by 20.5 ft.) Accessory Structures: • Tennis Court: Setbacks - front -from Crystal Ridge Road- 40 feet; side property lines - 9 ft.; and rear property line - 35 ft.; Retaining Walls: • Proposed retaining walls vary in height with a max. exposed height of 11 ft.; The proposed project's development standards comply with the Tract Map's approved development standards and the City's development standards. However, the retaining wall heights and the tennis court nine foot side yard setback do not comply with the City's Development Code standards. The applicant will be required to locate the tennis court one foot closer to the residence, thereby maintaining the required ten foot side yard setback. However, the retaining wall requires the Variance due to the exposed height in excess of six feet. 4 Architectural Features and Colors The proposed residence's architectural style is Mediterranean. This style is compatible with previously approve residences within Tract No. 47850 and "The Country Estates" due to the eclectic architectural style that is existing in this area. A materials/colors board has been submitted which delineates the following: o Exterior Stucco Walls ♦ Merlex/Bisque P-141 (beige) ♦ Roof Concrete tile/Eagle Weathered Terra- cotta 3532 (streaked -terra cotta/gold) ♦ Columns and Balusters o Dunn Edwards/White SP-l(white) ♦ Trim, windows and Fascia ♦ Dunn Edwards/Swiss Coffee SP -836 (off- white) ♦ Stone Accent * Colorado European Castles Stone/Golden Blend PF -8104 (beige/tan) The proposed materials/colors board was compared to boards pre- viously approved for homes adjacent or near the project site (Lots 20 -vacant, 21, 22, 23, and Parcels A and C). The comparison indicates that each lot's color scheme is somewhat similar to other colors chosen due to the fact that earth and gray tones are being utilized. - However, stone will be utilized for the exterior walls adjacent to the entry. It will also be utilized as wainscoting on the remaining front fagade exterior walls of the proposed residence. The variation in the architectural styles and colors and materials between the proposed residence and existing residences within the tract will result in providing a desirable environment, good aesthetic use of materials, textures and colors that will remain aesthetically appealing while offering variety in color and texture. The proposed prominent architectural feature/focal point is the front entry of the residence. Four fluted Ionic type columns support the gable roof entry. Windows influenced by Palladianism and balconies are also prominent architectural features. Floor Plan The proposed residence consists of three levels as present in Exhibit "A". The first floor consists of front entry, living room, media room, dining room, kitchen with an adjacent dirty kitchen, pantry, breakfast nook, family room, powder room, bedroom with bathroom, storage room and two two -car garages. The second floor consists of a service room, library, three bedrooms each with a bathroom, master bedroom suite with a bathroom and wardrobe and three exterior balconies. R Grading The pad elevation of 942.0 feet will remain. However, the applicant proposes to cut into the side and rear slopes, thereby expanding the pad. The pad expansion will range from 10 feet at the west side yard and rear yard to 15 and 21 feet in the east side yard to accommodate the tennis court pad. Although slopes have some landscaping that will be disturbed or destroyed with the pad expansion, the planting materials are non-native vegetation which is not part of Vesting Tract No. 47850's mitigation monitoring. Tennis Court Tennis court lighting and fencing will be installed. The applicant will be required to submit a detail of said fencing and lighting for the City's review and approval prior to the issuance of any City permits. Pursuant to Code, tennis court light fixtures shall not be located closer than 10 feet to the adjacent property line and not located more than 18 feet from the court surface. The light poles shall have a five-foot extension arm, which complies with Code. The fixtures shall be shielded in a manner that completely cuts off light source when viewed from any point five feet or more beyond the property line. The incident light level at a property line is required to not exceed one -footcandle measured from grade at a 12 -foot height. The incident light level upon any habitable building on an adjacent property shall not exceed .05 footcandle. In the event that the illuminated court surface is visible from another parcel, it will be required that the applicant treat the court surface with a low reflecting, dark - colored coating. Additionally, it is required that court lighting not be operated between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays and between 11:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on Saturdays and Sundays. Landscaping/Irrigation A landscape/irrigation plan was not submitted with this project. The applicant will be required to submit said plan at a later date, reflecting the landscaping guidelines and restrictions set forth by Vesting Tract Map No. 47850 and the type of planting materials, color, size, quantity and location for the City's review and approval. It is required that the approved landscaping and irrigation be installed within six months of the project's final inspection or Certificate of occupancy issuance. However, the applicant has submitted a landscape plan for the area adjacent to Crystal Ridge Road and the tennis court. The tennis court landscaping shall be installed prior to final inspection or Certificate of occupancy issuance. The proposed landscaping will effectively mitigate the view of the tennis court from Crystal Ridge Road. .9 Buyers' Awareness Package As a tract map condition of approval, the applicant created a City approved Buyers' Awareness Package. This package addressed issues related to property geology, wildlife corridors, tree preservation, existence and constraints of Significant Ecological Area No.15 and Tonner Canyon, property restrictions and similar related matters. The Buyers' Awareness Package is required to be delivered to each buyer-. A copy of the signed receipt by the buyer verifying receipt of the package and that the buyer has read the information within the package must be forwarded to the City. To insure this process, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant will be required to forward the receipt to the City. In the event no buyer has purchased the property, the receipt is to be forwarded before approval of future improvements (i.e., hardscape, pool/spa, retaining walls, patio covers, etc .) - Variance The purpose of a Variance is to allow for adjustment from the development standards specified within the Development Code. Adjustments may be granted when, because of special circumstances applicable to the property (i.e., location, shape, size, surroundings, topography, or other conditions), the strict application lication of the Development Code denies the property owner privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zoning districts or creates an unnecessary, and non -self created, hardship or unreasonable regulations which make it obviously impractical to require compliance with the specified development standards. A Variance may be granted for relief from the required standards for setbacks, structure heights, lot coverage, dimensional, distance separation, parcel area, open space, etc. Retaining Walls The Development Code permits walls, retaining walls and fences with a maximum exposed height of six feet. The Code does permit said structures to be taller with Director's approval, Minor Variance or Variance. For this project a Variance is required with the Commission's review and approval due to the proposed maximum exposed height. The proposed retaining walls utilized to expand the pad are holding a cut. The retaining walls vary in height with a maximum exposed height of 11 feet. The highest portions of the retaining wall will be located within the rear and rear side yard of the project site. The pad expansion will range from 10 feet to 21 feet. 7 Based on Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 47850's approval, many lots within this tract were designed and graded to accommodate tennis courts and tennis courts have been approved for such lots. In this case, due to the lot's location on a cul-de-sac, configuration and topography, the majority of the recreational area is located in the east side yard. As such, this yard area is the most feasible location for the tennis court. Therefore;-a- retaining*wall is needed cutting into the slope, thereby creating a tennis court pad. Due to the project site's topography, the creating of the tennis court pad causes the retaining walls to exceed an exposed height of six feet as allowed by code without a variance process. Furthermore, the retaining wall will be utilized to create a minimal increased amount of recreational area in the rear,and west side yard. Since the retaining walls are holding a cut, they will be viewed from the proposed residential structure and will not impact the neighboring views. Additional Review The City's Public Works and Building and Safety Divisions reviewed this project. Their recommendations are within the attached draft resolution. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The environmental evaluation shows that the proposed project is consistent with the previously certified Environmental Impact Report No. 91-2 for Tract Map Nos. 47850, 47851 and 48287 according to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15162(a) of Article 11 of the California Code of Regulations. Therefore, further environment review is not required. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: Notice for this project was published in the Inland Valley Bulletin and the San Gabriel Valley Tribune on January 31, 2001. Public hearing notices were mailed to approximately 24 property owners within a 500 -foot radius of the project site on January 29, 2001. Furthermore, the project site was posted with a display board on January 30, 2001 and the public notice was posted in three public places on January 30 2001. F: RECODMNDATIONS: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Administrative Development Review No. 2001-01 and Variance No. 2001-02, Findings of Fact and conditions of approval as listed within the attached resolution. REQUIRED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FINDINGS: 1. The design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, City Design Guidelines, development standards of the applicable district, and architectural criteria for special areas, (e.g. theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards, or planned developments); 2. The design and layout of the proposed development will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future development, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards; 3. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the characteristics of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain and enhance the harmonious, orderly and attractive development.contemplated by Chapter 22.48 of the City's Development Code, the General Plan, or any applicable specific plan; 4. The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, and color that will remain aesthetically appealing; 5. The proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious (e.g. negative affect on property values ore resale(s) of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 6. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). 9 1 REQUIRED VARIANCE FINDINGS: 1. There are special circumstances applicable to the property (e.g., location, shape, size, surroundings, topography, or other conditions), so that the strict application of the City's Development Code denies the property owner privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zoning districts or creates an unnecessary and non -self created, hardship or unreasonable regulation which makes it obviously impractical to require compliance with the development standards; 2. Granting the Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other property owners in the same vicinity and zoning districts and denied to the property owner for which the Variance is sought; 3. Granting the Variance is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan; 4. The proposed entitlement would not he detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City; and 5. The proposed entitlement has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Prepared by: Ann J. Lungu, Associate Planner Attachments: 1. Draft resolution; 2. Exhibit "A" - site plan, floor plan, elevations, sections, grading/drainage plan, tennis court landscape plan and colors/materials board dated February 13, 2001; 3. Color Rendering; 4. Applications; and 5. Tree Preservation Statement dated January 3, 2001. we A. B. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -XX A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING ADMINISTRATIVE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 2001-01 AND THE VARIANCE NO. 2001-02, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A TWO-STORY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH TWO TWO -CAR GARAGES AND BALCONIES TOTALING TO APPROXIMATELY 8,800 SQUARE FEET, TENNIS COURTS AND RETAINING WALLS NOT EXCEEDING AN EXPOSED HEIGHT OF 11 FEET. THE PROJECT SITE IS LOCATED AT 2888 CRYSTAL RIDGE ROAD (PARCELED B, TRACT NO. 47850), DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA. RECITALS. 1. The property owner/ applicant, Diamond Bar West, LLC, has filed an application for Administrative Development Review No. 2001-01 and Variance No. 2001-02 for a property located at 2888 Crystal Ridge Road, Diamond Bar, Los Angeles County, California. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Administrative Development Review and Variance shall be referred to as the "Application." 2. On January 29, 2001, public hearing notices were mailed to approximately 24 property owners of record within a 500 - foot radius of the project. On January 31, 2001, notification of the public hearing for this project was provided in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers. Also, on January 30, 2001, the public hearing notice was posted in three public places within the City of Diamond Bar and the project site was posted with a display board. 3. On February 13, 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Application. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: 1. This Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 1 2. The Planning Commission hereby finds that the identified above in this Resolution is consistent with thee,, previously certified Environmental Impact Report No. 91-2 for Tract Nos. 47850, 47851 and 48487 according to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970 and guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15162-(a) of Article 11 of the California Code of Regulations. 3. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds and determines that, having considered the record as a whole including the findings set forth below, and changes and alterations which have been incorporated into and conditioned upon the proposed project set forth in the application, there is no evidence before this Planning Commission that the project proposed herein will have the potential of an adverse effect on wild life resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Based upon substantial evidence, this Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effects contained in Section 753.5 (d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 4. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein, .this Planning Commission hereby finds as follows: (a) The project relates to a 50 -lot subdivision approved by the City Council on June 6, 1995. It is located at 2888 Crystal Ridge Road, on the cul-de-sac where Crystal Ridge Road intersects Water Course Drive and adjacent to a gated community identified as "The Country Estates". The project site, a vacant lot, is approximately 44,821 square feet with a pad area of 16,420 square feet and pad elevation of 942.0 feet. Easements are located within the front portion of the lot adjacent to Crystal Ridge Road. These easements are for access purposes, public utility and services and sanitary sewer. This lot is somewhat triangular shaped and contains three slopes, one at the rear and sides that slopes down to the pad and one at the front that slopes down to Crystal Ridge Road. These slopes contain some vegetation, however the vegetation is not part of the mitigation monitoring plan. (b) The project site ha's a General Plan land use designation of Rural Residential (RR). (c) The project site is within the Single Family Residence -Minimum Lot Size 20,000 Square Feet (R-1- 2.0,000) Zone. 9 (d) Generally, the following zones surround the pi'6'je-e-.,t site: to the north is the R-1-20,000 Zone; to ''he", South is the Agriculture (AG) Zone; to the east is the,, R-1-20,000 Zone; and to the west is the Single Family Residence -Minimum Lot Size 9,000 Square Feet (R-1- 9,000) Zone. (e) The Application request is for approval to construct a two-story single-family residence with two--two-car garage and balconies for a total of approximately 8,800 square feet. The Application request includes a tennis court and retaining walls not exceeding an exposed height of 11 feet located within the rear and side yards. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (f) The design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with the applicable elements of the City's General Plan, City Design Guidelines, and development standards of the applicable district, design guidelines, and architectural criteria for special areas (e.g., theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards or planned developments). Originally, Tract Map No. 47850 was submitted as a vesting tentative tract map. At that time, the City was operating under a draft General Plan'. The General Plan was adopted on July 25, 1995. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 47850 was approved on June 5, 1995. However, this vesting map was designed at 25 percent below the maximum allowable density and has an overall average density of 1.49 dwelling units per acre which, complies with the General Plan land use designation of Rural Residential (Maximum 1 DU/AC). Additionally, the proposed project complies with the General Plan objectives and strategies and the City's Design Guidelines related to maintaining the integrity of residential neighborhoods and open space. Furthermore, the proposed project is compatible with the eclectic architectural style,_ colors and materials of other homes within Tract No. 47850 and the adjacent "Country Estates. (g) The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future development and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. Tract Map No. 47850's Environmental Impact Report No. 91-2, certified by the City, addresses the design and layout of the neighborhood as well as the flow of 3 pedestrian and vehicular traffic. Steeplecha4-,.Lane and Water Course Drive and other access roads td,the tract adequately serve the project site as presented in the Environmental Impact Report. These private, streets are designed to handle minimum traffic created by this gated residential development. Therefore, the use of a contemplated single-family residence --will not interfere -with the_ use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or -future development and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. (h) The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22.48.20. Development Review Standards, City Design Guidelines, the City's General Plan, or any applicable specific plan. The proposed prominent architectural feature/focal point is the front entry of the residence. Four fluted Ionic type columns support the gable roof entry. Windows influenced by Palladianism and balconies are also prominent architectural features. Furthermore, architectural treatment extends to all sides of the proposed residential structure. The proposed materials/colors board was compared to boards previously approved for homes adjacent or near the project site (Lots 20 -vacant, 21, 22, 23, and Parcels A and C). The comparison indicates that each lot's color --scheme is somewhat 'similar to other colors chosen due to the fact that earth and gray tones are being utilized. However, stone will be utilized for the exteriorwallsadjacent to the entry. It will also be utilized as wainscoting on the remaining front fagade exterior walls of the proposed residence. The variation in the architectural styles and colors and materials between the proposed residence and existing residences within the tract will result in providing a desirable environment, good aesthetic use of materials, textures and colors that will remain aesthetically appealing while offering variety in color and texture. Therefore, the architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the - character of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22.48.20. Development Review Standards, City Design Guidelines, the City's General Plan. Additionally, as approved the proposed project will be compatible with Vesting Tract Map No. 47850's development standards. 0 r. (i) The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, and color that will remain aesthetically appealing and will retain a reasonably adequate level of maintenance. As referenced in the above findings and the colors /materials board, the proposed project will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, and color that will remain aesthetically appealing while offering variety in color, texture and a low level of maintenance. (j) The proposed development will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious (e.g. negative affect on property values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity; and Before the issuance of any City permits, the proposed project is required to comply with all conditions within the approved resolution and the Building and Safety Division., Public Works Division, and Fire Department requirements. The ,referenced agencies through the permit and inspection process willensure that the proposed project is not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to the properties or. improvements in the vicinity. (k) The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); The environmental evaluation shows that the proposed project is consistent with the previously certified Environmental Impact Report ort No. 91-2 for Tract Map Nos. 47850, 47851 and 48287 according to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15162(a) of Article 11 of the California Code of Regulations. VARIANCE (1) There are special circumstances applicable to the property (e.g., location,, shape, size, surroundings, topography, or other conditions), so that the strict application of the City's Development Code denies the I property owner privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zoning."- districts oningdistricts or creates an unnecessary and -non -self created, hardship or unreasonable regulation which makes it obviously impractical to require compliance with the development standards; - Based on Vesting 'Tentative Tract Map No. 47850!s approval, many lots within this tract were designed and graded to accommodate tennis courts and tennis courts have been approved for such lots. In this case, due to the lot's location on a cul-de-sac, configuration and topography, the majority of the recreational area is located in the east side yard. As such, this yard area is the most feasible location for the tennis court. Therefore, a retaining wall is needed cutting into the slope, thereby creating a tennis court pad. Due to the project site's topography, the creating of the tennis court pad causes the retaining walls to exceed an exposed height of six feet as allowed by code without a variance process. Furthermore, the retaining wall will be utilized to create a minimal increased amount of recreational area in the rear and west side yard. Since the retaining walls are holding a cut, they will be viewed from the proposed residential structure and will not impact the neighboring views. Granting the Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other property owners in the same vicinity and zoning districts and denied to the property owner for which the Variance is sought; As stated above in Finding (1), based on Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 47850's approval, many lots within this tract were designed and graded to accommodate tennis courts and tennis courts have been approved for such lots. As a result, Granting the Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other property owners in the same vicinity and zoning districts and denied to the property owner for which the Variance is sought. (n) Granting the Variance is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan; As referenced above in Findings (1) and (m) , the proposed retaining wall is consistent with the General Plan and also consistent with specific strategies 1.2.4 and 2.2.1 of the Land Use Element. 0 (o) The proposed entitlement would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or*�,. welfare of the City; Before the issuance of any City permits, the proposed project is required to comply with all conditions within the approved resolution and the Building and Safety Division, Public Works Division, and Fire Department requirements. The referenced agencies through the permit and inspection process will ensure that the proposed project is not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. 5. Based on the findings and,conclusions set forth above, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Application subject to the following conditions: The project shall substantially conform to site plan, grading plan,. floor plan, elevations, grading/drainage plan, sections to tennis court, landscape plan and colors/materials board collectively labeled as Exhibit "A" dated February 13, 2001 as submitted and approved by the Planning Commission, and as amended herein. (b) The site shall be maintained in a condition, which is free of debris both during and after the construction, addition, or implementation of the entitlement granted herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether during or subsequent to construction shall be done only by the property owner, applicant or by a duly permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste from residential, commercial, construction, and industrial .areas within the City. It shall be the applicant's obligation to insure that the waste contractor utilized has obtained permits from the City of Diamond Bar to provide such services. (c) The applicant shall submit a revised site plan that delineates a 10 foot side yard setback for the tennis court. (d) Prior to the issuance of any City permits, the applicant shall submit a site plan and detail delineating the tennis court fencing and.lighting for the City's review and approval. Pursuant to Code Section 22.16.050 E., tennis court light fixtures shall not be located closer than 10 feet to the adjacent property line and not located more than 18 FA feet from the court surface. The light poles shall have a five-foot extension arm, which complies with Code. The fixtures shall be shielded in a manner that completely cuts off light source when viewed from any point five feet or more beyond the property line. The incident light level at a property line is required to not exceed one -footcandle measured from grade at a 12 - foot height- The incident light level upon any habitable building on an adjacent property shall not exceed .05 footcandle. In the event that the illuminated court surface is visible from another parcel, it shall be required that the applicant treat the court surface with a low reflecting, dark -colored coating. Additionally, tennis court lighting shall not be operated between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays and between 11:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on Saturdays and Sundays. (e) Sixty days prior to final inspection or issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall submit a landscape/irrigation plan for the City's review and approval. Said plan shall reflect the landscape guidelines set forth by Tract No. 47850 and delineate plant species, size, quantity and location. Landscaping/irrigation shall be installed within six months of occupancy. (f) The applicant shall submit a landscape plan for the area adjacent to Crystal Ridge Road and the tennis court for the City's review and approval. Said landscaping shall effectively mitigate the view of the tennis court from Crystal Ridge Road and shall be installed prior to final inspection or certificate of occupancy issuance. (g) Prior to final inspection or Certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall replaced trees and shrubs located on the project site slopes that are destroyed during construction, by the same species, size and quantity. (h) Prior to construction, the applicant shall install temporary construction fencing pursuant to the building and Safety Division's requirements along the project perimeter. (i) Prior to final inspection or the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall submit to the City Planning Division written evidence indicating the buyer's receipt of the "Buyers' Awareness Package." In the event no one has purchased the property, then the receipt shall be submitted before approval of future improvements 9 (i.e., hardscape, landscaping, pool/spa, retaining walls, etc.). (j) The single family residence shall not be utilized in a manner that creates adverse effects (i.e, significant levels of dust; glare/light, noise, odor, traffic, or other disturbances) upon the neighborhood and environmental setting. Additionally, the single family residence shall not result in significantly adverse effects on public services or resources. No portion of the residence shall be rented, used for commercial/institutional purposes, or otherwise utilized as a separate dwelling. The property shall not be used for regular gatherings that result in a nuisance or create traffic and parking problems in the neighborhood. (k) Retaining wall shall not exceed an exposed height of eleven feet. (1) Prior to the issuance of any City permits, the applicant shall submit a retaining wall detail delineating top of wall, top of footing and finish surfaces and retaining wall calculations for the City's review and approval. (m) Grading plan review and approval shall be required if cut/fill quantities are greater than 50 cubic yards of earthwork. Prior to the issuance of any City permits, the applicant shall submit a complete grading plan in accordance with the City's grading requirements for the City's review and approval. The grading plan shall delineate the following: (1) Existing and proposed topography; (2) All finish surface and finished grade elevation and flow lines; (3) Cut and fill quantities and earth work . calculation; (4) Grading plan shall be signed/stamped by a civil engineer, geotechnical engineer, and geologist, as required; and (5) All easements. (n) Fine grade certification shall be required before final inspection or issuance Certificate of occupancy. (o) If applicable, prior to the issuance of any City permits, the applicant shall submit a soils report for the City's review and approval that incorporates the scope of the proposed development and appropriate recommendations for the project's construction. 0 (p) Prior to the issuance of any City permits, the applicant shall submit a proper drainage plan indicating details and sections for the City's review and approval. (q) Before the issuance of any City permits, the applicant shall submit an -erosion -control plan for the City's review and approval. The erosion control plan shall conform to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards and incorporate the appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP's). Additionally, the applicant shall obtain the necessary NPDES permits. (r) The applicant shall be responsible for sewer connection and shall ensure connection with Los Angeles County Department of Public Works and the Sanitation District. (s) The proposed residence shall comply with the State Energy Conservation Standards. ' (t) Surface water shall drain away from the proposed residence at a two -percent minimum slope. (u) The proposed single-family residence is located within "Fire -Zone 41" and shall meet all requirements of said zone. (1) All roof covering shall be "Fire Retardant." Tile roof shall be fire stopped at the eaves to preclude entry of the flame or members under the fire. (2) All unenclosed under -floor areas shall be constructed as exterior walls. (3) All openings into the attic, floor and/or other enclosed areas shall be covered with corrosion - resistant wire mesh not less than 1/4 inch or more than 1/2 inch in dimension except where such openings are equipped with sash or door. (4) Chimneys shall have spark arrests of maximum 1/2 inch screen. (v) Plans shall conform to State and'Local Building Code (i.e., 1997 Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, and the.1996 National Electrical Code) requirements. (w) Construction plans shall be engineered to meet wind in loads of 80 M.P.H. with a "C" exposure. 10 (x) Prior to the issuance of any construction permits, the applicant shall submit construction plans to. -the Los Angeles County Fire Department for review and approval. (y) The residential structure shall maintain a 7.5 foot setback from the retaining wall proposed on the north side of the project site. (z) This grant is valid for two years and shall be exercised (i.e., construction started) within that period or this grant shall expire. A one-year extension of time may be approved when submitted to the City in writing at least 60 days prior to the expiration date. The Planning Commission will consider the extension request at a duly noticed public hearing in accordance with Chapter 22.72 of the City of Diamond Bar Development Code. (aa) This grant shall not be effective for any purpose until the permittee and owner of 'the property involved (if other than the permittee) have filed, within fifteen (15) days of approval of this grant, at the City of Diamond Bar Community and Development Services Department, their affidavit stating that they are aware of and agree to accept all the conditions of this -grant. Further, this grant shall not be effective until the permittee pays remaining City processing fees, school fees and fees for the review of submitted reports. (bb) If the Department of Fish and Game determines that Fish and Game Code Section 711.4 applies to the approval of this project, then the applicant shall remit to the City, within five days of this grant's approval, a cashier's check of $25.00 for a documentary handling fee in connection with Fish and Game Code requirements. Furthermore, if this project is not exempt from a filing fee imposed because the project has more than a deminimis impact on fish and wildlife, the applicant shall also pay to the Department of Fish and Game any such fee and any fine which the Department determines to be owed. The Planning Commission shall: (a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and (b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, to: Diamond Bar West, 11 LLC, 3480 Torrance Boulevard, Suite #300, Torrance, CA, 90503. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH OF FEBRUARY 2001, BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. BY: Steve Nelson, Chairman I, James DeStefano, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and ad ' opted by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day February 2001, by the following vote: ATTEST: �-*z NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: James DeStefano, Secretary M CITY OF MNMOND BA.K COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 21660 E. Copley Drive Suite 190 _ •:x =" (909)396-5676 Fax (909)861-3117 VARIANCE APPLICATION Record Owner Applicant Name DIAMOND BAR WEST PARTNERS RICHARD (Last name fust) (Last name first) Address 3480 Torrance Blvd., 3480 Torrance Blvd., Suite 300 Suite 300 City Torrance Torrance Zip 90503 90503 Phone( ) Phone( ) Phone( ) l.. CF v FPL # Deposit $ Receipt# By Date Rec'd Applicant's Agent (Last name first) NOTE: It is the applicant's responsibility to notify the Community Development Director in writing of any change of the principals involved during the processing of this case. (Attach separate sheet, if necessary, including names, addresses, and signatures of members of partnerships, joint ventures, and directors of corporations.) Consent: I certify that I am the owner of the herein described property and permit the applicant to file this request. Signed (All record owners) Date Certification: I, the undersigned, hereby certify under penalty of peoFury that the information herei"rovided isy correct to the best of my knowledge. _ Print Name L H L- O C--7 q Zn- Signed Date , ,y ( plicant or Agent)77) ! Location2888 Crystal Ridge Road Parcel B of lot line adjnGtment 98-001 of Tract 47850 (Street address or tract and lot number) between Crystal Ridge Road and Water Course Drive (Street) (Street) Zoning R1 — 20,000 BNM Project Size (gross acres) 1.04 Project Density 1 unit / acre Previous Cases Present Use of Site Vacant Use applied for Single Family Residence Domestic Water Source Water Company Company/District Walnut Valley Water Company Method of Sewage Disposal Sewer Sanitation District LA Co. Sanitation District Grading of Lots by Applicant? YES X NO Amount (Show necessary grading design on site plan or tent. map) - LEGAL DESCRIPTION (All ownership comprising the proposed lots/project). If petitioning for zone change, attach legal description of exterior boundaries of arra subject to the change.) Parcel B of Lot Line Adjustment 98-001. of Tract. 47850 Project Site: 45,486 1 Gross Area No. of Lots Area devoted to : Structures 5155 sq. f t . Open Space 25,684.5 Residential project: 8,001 sq . f t . and 2 Gross Area No. of floors Proposed Density 1 Units/Acres Number and types of Units 1 Single Family Residential Parldng: Type Garage Required 2 Provided 4 Total Required 2 Total Provided 4 VARIANCE CASE -BURDEN OF PROOF In addition to the information required in the application, the applicant shall substantiate to the satisfaction of the planning Commission, the following facts: A. That the requested use at the location proposed will not: Adversely affect the health, peace, comfort or welfare or persons residing or working in the surrounding area, or 2. Be materially detrimental to the use, enjoyment or valuation of property of other persons located in the vicinity of the site, or 3. Jeopardize, endanger or other wise constitute a menace to the public health, safety or general welfare. The application concerns only a variance as to the height of a rear yard retaining wall, which will exceed the standard maximum height by approx. 2 to 6 ft. over only a portion of the northeast corner of the subiect Property. The irregular shape and the ropography of the site is such that the wall height is necessary to accommodate a tennis court.- Many of the existing homes, in the surrounding development have similar walls for similar purposes, and the difference in height will be visible only from -the subject _property- inating any possibility of adverse affect, detriment or jeopardy to any resident or B. That the proposed site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and property loading facilities, landscaping and other development features prescribed in this Ordinance, or as is owner otherwise required in order to integrate said use with the uses in the surrounding area. The site plan shows that the site is entirely adequate in size and shape to accommodate all planned improvements, including the tennis court retaining wall that is the subject of this application. In fact, it is the irregular shape of the subiect parcel which necessitates the use of the wall and its height. This lot was in fact graded under a plan approved prior to the adoption of the Ordinance which results in the need for this variance application, and a reading of -the Ordinance in C. That the proposed site is. -.adequately served: context indicates that the intent thereof was not to address situations and circumstances such as this 1. By highways or streets of sufficient width and improved as necessary to carry the kind and quantity of traffic such use would generate, and 2. By other public or private service facilities as are required. This is entirely non—applicable to the subject application. The site is a residential lot served by publicandPrivate streets, and the application will have no affect whatsoever on the kind or quantity of traffic-, or upon any other -public or privateservicefacilities. D. That there are special circumstances or exceptional characteristics applicable to the property involved, such as size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, which are not generally applicable to other properties in the same vicinity and under identical zoning classification. The irregular shape and topography of this parcel are such that a variance in height of the retaining wall is necessary to fulfill — i.e. it is only at the northeast corner of the lot that the height above grade must exceed tie norm, and that because of the shape and topography. The topography, location and surroundings are such that no one but the owner of the parcel in question will even be able to see the increase in height—it will not be apparent to any other persons, and _---- - I __ - ____j __ - - ..sir __� I- --- 4-- to I., k. int -ant E. That such variance is necessary for the preservation of a substantial property right of the applicant such as that possessed by owners of other property in the same vicinity and zone. A number of lots within this developement and the greater surrounding area of The Country have tennis courts and other such_anaillary. improvements, and have utilized retaining walls in the construction thereof. This lot was graded to create a pad capable of acaDmmQAatiDg such improvement, and without the variance being sought, a substantial amount of the lot's value will be lost. F. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or be injurious to other property or improvements in the same vicinity and -zone. Many of the existing homes in the surrounding—,developmpnt have similar walls for similar purposes, and the difference in heightwillbe visible only from the subject propgrty, eliminating any possibilityofadverse affect, detriment or ieoi)ardy to any resident or. property owner. Staff Use Project No. INITIAL STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE A. GENERAL INFORMATION Project Applicant (Owner): Project Representative: DIAMOND BAR WEST PARTNERS RICHARD GOULD NAME NAME 3_480 Torrance BLvd., Suite_300 3480 Torrance Blvd Suite '300 ADDRESS ADDRESS Torrance, CA 90503 Torrance CA 90503 (310) 540-3990 (310) 540-3990 PHONE # PHONE # 1. Action requested and project description: Construct 12' high retaining wall 2. Street location of project: 2888 Crystal Ridge Road 3a. Present use of site: Vacant 3b. Previous use of site or structures: Vacant 4. Please list all previous cases Tract 47850 (if any) related to this project:Lot Line Adjustment 98-001 5. Other related permit/approvals required. Specify type and granting agency.Desi n Review 6. Are you planning future phases of this project? Y O If yes, explain: 7. Project Area: Covered by structures, paving: 19,784-34 Landscaping, open space: 25,684.51 Total Area: 45,468 85 8. Number of floors: 2 9. Present zoning: R 10. Water and sewer service: Domestic Public Water Sewers Does service exist at site? O N N If yes, do purveyors have capacity to meet demand of project and all other approved projects? ON N If domestic water or public sewers are not available, how will these services be provided? Residential Projects: 11. Number and type of units: l 12. Schools: What school district(s) serves the property? Walnut Valley School District Are exisq*VlAchool. facilities adequate to meet project needs? NO If not, what provisions will be made for additional classrooms? N/A Non -Residential projects: 13. Distance to nearest residential use or sensitive use (school, hospital, etc.) N/A 14. Number and floor area of buildings: N/A 15. Number of employees and shifts: N/A 16. Maximum employees per shift: N / A 17. Operating hours: N /A 18. Identify any: End products _ Waste products N /A Means of disposal N/A 19. Do project operations use, store or produce hazardous -substances such as oil, pesticides, chemicals, paints, or radioactive materials? YES NO If yes, explain N / A 20. Do your operations require any pressurizer) tanks? YES ONO If yes, explain 21. Identify any flammable, reactive or explosive materials to be located on-site. NJA 22. Will delivery or shipment trucks travel through residential areas to reach the nearest highway? YES NO If yes, explain B. ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION 1. Environmental Setting—Project Site a. Existing use/structures None b. Topography/slopes Pad on Lot *c. Vegetation Per Tract 47850 Landscape *d. Animals No *e. Watercourses No f. Cultural/historical resources No g. Other N / A 2. Environmental Setting — Surrounding Area a. Existing uses structures (types, densities): N/A b. Topography/slopes Graded Pad Tract 47850 *c. Vegetation *d. Animals *e. Watercourses f. Cultural/historicalresources N/A g. Other * Answers are not required if the area does not contain natural, undeveloped land. 3. Are there any major trees on the site, including oak trees? YES NO If yes, type and number: 4 Will any natural watercourses, surface now patterns, etc., be changed through project development?: YES NO If yes, explain: 5. Grading: Will the project require grading? (YES J NO If yes, how many cubic yards/? 300 cu . r d . Will it be balanced on-site? YES NO If not balanced, where will dirt be obtained or deposited? Tract 50314 & 48487 6. Are there any identifiable landslides or other major geologic hazards on the property (including uncompacted fill)? YES NO If yes, explain: 7. Is the property located within a high fire hazard area (hillsides with moderately dense vegetation)? YES NO Distance to nearest fire station: 8. Noise: Existing noise sources at site: N/A Noise to be generated by project: N/A Fumes: Odors generated by project: N/A Could toxic fumes be generated? N / A 9.. What energy -conserving designs or material will be used? CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and W'zj' G Date / Signafiut" 'Z7 - For: LUAUVIUl-1111JGVt.I.Ut1�1C.1\1 .^z ti -°° - __1ll t ■ 21660 E. Col Drive Suite 190 (909)396-5676 Fax (909)861-3117 ADMINISTRATIVE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW/ Record Owner Applicant Name Diamond Bar West, LLC Richard Gould (Last name first) (Last name fust) Addre3sa4 D T(]rran['P B2 _ Ste. 30n aama as nwnpr City Tnrranra Zip 90503 Deposit $ Receipt# By Date Rec'd Applicant's Agent (Last name first) Phone( ) 310-540-3990 Phone( ) 110-540-3990 Phone( ) NOTE: It is the applicant's responsibility to notify the Community Development Director in writing of any change of the principals involved during the processing of this case. (Attach a separate sheet, if necessary, including names, addresses, and signatures of members of partnerships, joint ventures, and directors of corporations.) Consent: I certify that I mythen�f the herein described property and permit the applicant to file this request. Signed GREG DELGADO, President Date Certification: I, the undersigned, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information herein provided is correct to the best of my knowledge. Print Name RICHARD GOULD pplieant or Agent) Signed L A,=� Date (Applicant or Agent) Location 2888 CRYSTAL RIDGE ROAD — Parcel .B (Street address or tract and lot number) G Zoning R-1— 20 000 150 HNM Previous Cases none 77 Present Use of Site Vacarr Lot- Use orUse applied for New Single Fa -i l;z R—Ji de e W Legal description (all ownership r orising the proposed lot(s)'parmls)) Tract No. 47850 Lot No. B in the City of Diamond Bar, .aunty of Los Angeles, a e o,. a i..orFla, being a su ivzsion o= Varceis and 3 anU a portion of Parcel 5 of Parcel Map No. 1528, filed in Book 26, Pages 19 to 30, inclusive, or Parcel Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said County. Area devoted to structures 4 s i s G, f Landscaping/Open space 40,313 s. f. Project Size Lot Coverage 11.3 Proposed density, (Units/Acres) Style of Architecture Mediterranean Number of Floors Proposed 2 Slope of Roof 5:12 Grading If yes, Quantity Cut Fill Import If yes, Quantity - Export If yes, Quantity [ ✓] The subject property contains no oak trees. [ ] The subject property contains one or more oak trees, however the applicant anticipates that no activity (grading and/or construction) will take place within five (3) feet of the outer dripline of any oak tree. [ ] The subject property contains one or more oak trees and the applicant states that activity (grading and/or construction) will take place within five () feet of the outer dripline of any oak tree. an Oak Thee Permit has been or will be applied for prior to any activity taking place on the property. (AppLlcanvi tivoture) (Dat®) PROPERTY 9�S LINE 90.0' 'G '3 1 t N 90' 00'00" E 164.18' ------------ 955--------------- Q __-_-______,_Qoff?\ opo \ (1 I I \\� SSE 9 €Gb9� >Lr . ii �)s`' - a� � � -1 car M: zz- ji E q S PROPOSED RESIDENCE FOR: R GDULD At ASSOC.) If,iC. '11MbTIR S. AACLIS ALA 6A ig P SHUN-YI AND VANN[ LEE S LANDSCAPE PIAN CRYSTAL K—t ESTATEO D E S I G N A P l! N N I N C tl u D d 2f 60 CRYSTAL E M1P.,DIAMONp EAR,Lh, nnirc3 e)w Sim[)m I•Sv 10nwRSelvv.iVD[ f•^.ELC, TM1ALTH.. FIp64'ID SO,Cp.Of'LOS hHb ELES I llfts°ifEEIEi"fIFrE j}IFr. ;S!i)�kt, ,ItIittifF1EstakEit f2[Lt )t� ttLP [fE��tirf }Erf3tJr6[f=IsEEEEEIiI`I'i� rEEl i � i!_!( F {=j=jiiant^ ` E k �i011 r { E6 } Ei1 s.te`3f �l#,'lEf it gttHit tTEIlt )B El i i � ft 6 E =el °'�t � 13� � t :l l� FeE Cg E F� {~F¢�� t � � � � = k # k• � � � F)131F �Jt���i� kt • IE i' h P'� h L a { h <h•` `• `hwh'��b � hill• �t F� �h fh'� c I It�I i i i itil�i iil Il ii like n� '; 111))11)11)1)lf)1)l)lf))11111llill€illill)))111)l))jilll)ft)1) � I{fI= � � 339 E 5l SSI{SIIII####IEEE€EIE€€EE€I[EES6SSIfE:ttitttfttt#II#Ittittttti ll' -j' ° �PFtIl:PIPP222¢22¢222¢2222¢¢¢¢2¢222iLYYYLELLPL2LEYEY%LLPYL2LLLLF Itlttht ���Elfjjtt�� �,IrEfEfi �II� C:6fCLtEC:6EFiEite.E6'.fxf6E€6C6f CCC 666Cff"tE:FEeEE:ES6€E6tff:CCC13{ st[FSIef F#���yi�g4fl f �I ; 1i iCt � {E CC!t".G!G!ttt!!G!!ttt!G![000GCCtC•l GttCtttt Gttt tttCGtt•'ttttGtG ! I 3f SEFYe YIyY:::e:ttli:iie:6i::i:::::ke iire6e [i ei iii Z[ii heti Cii if itlt• �k3 kttli �II') EI FII I � 3t f F1{� •'tt=tEt€€lElti6El6=i6iEtElE€il# j I�- f IPkBk kk H6BktkBk67BB7 BBGki 6BB B8BB6B e e 't••P 1 ) i[i(�t[[����I[��[[�i��t�[��I4�[[�[t[t��([�I��4[E���[�[[[���[ti xi '_„ ` P 4f � {E•� i !k3311 k E IIIIIIIIi7777777777777777ii7777777777ii7777777777777777ii77777�3f# � • � � � - ; f ui- r4 i f 1If -- --" "+;,u,= p" '•.�' , `\ `,_bx$• `,\`I; r €I - I(I I IE `tf EPlESEp €i 'E �E OEj#�i ;FEBtt€{�P+�tti€��l�i'If!��flf�fI EE' Elf[F BMrFkE EIx�t{Ia� iIit Bft"�'► _lkE �I�ggI 3E I " •• \ u�• "}t(t i�%tf�y� & 1 � i ! � IiliP 66CC IL t{ i '� ••t •;1 1 10 1 ,�` ��,`, ���FF ti1; F� ellt€ fiEEE r$SSF; v� eN tm z � `•, t� ;Fsgy 5_)l:)n�P�fgrilEk,O i'E�:aE" �83�lEr:.'4°3"E�c i s' 6f Y 9- ItlxPT gk6lF 3f av E tl F! Ey� yBH 0 tFy �• a f E(� IR3CP1 °ItI $g f :a i E Ea k ti�°1F gl tai 7 5 64 �2ltu �•f E dAr .: if PE�B Pk=. 3`4a_3ba g1'M `�yl°c6 B it t v AA r 8 kC 1 'l i ��Ee S�a31�tia f ed-�� I if L E R GDULD A L h x x INC. TIMOTHY S. nncl3s ata A t P L A Y M I Y y .m �Cy wuxcc,uvolw ssm I,�vl NllRv nuncR uvww Iv Lq iP PROPOSED RESIDENCE FOR. a gx �% SHUN-YI AND VANNI LEE PLOT FLAN GR DTAL MIDGY CDTATCD .iY{" a ADD GR SThL RIpGC Rp pV.MONp DA1C,Gh PARGG. G,TRAGT No. 4TDDp.Gp. GY LOD ANG i ?;a -+g - PROPOSED RESIDENCE FOR: a h� LOWER SHUN AND VANNI,LEE FLOOR PLAN cRYBTFL RGrGG GBThreB. 8 ]HBB ORYSTFL RIDGG RD�DtFMOND BFR,OF. LOS PhROL'L H,TRFOT No. it BBO.00.CF hHGGLGS R. GOULD & ASSOC., INC. rrc " I C S 1 0 tl ter nr (tial rxrrrn xux[4 carer Drol rarrrer I R. GOULD & ASSOC., INC. P L A V K 1 9 a PROPOSED RESIDENCE FOR: 4 tip UPPER SHUN -YL AND VANNI LEE r FLOOR PLAN R. GOULD & ASSOC., INC. P L A V K 1 9 a a maps as**** IEEE Immw lalv*U- R.- l I moll psi Islas a I:::::: as a as** z R. GOULD & ASSOC., INC. {� voTRr s. nsc m D I D I G_9 E I L A N R I ++mxu,u wrtl (te)to +ta (,ell rtwl 4 CS 9 PROPOSED RESIDENCE FOR: , nl P RIGHT SIDE AND LEFT SIDE SHUN-Yt AND VANNI LEE GRYDTAL RIDGn-TATnn y' ELEVAT10NS assn e2roTAL woGe PAM1GGL O,TRACT No. a'fD60•GO.OI'LM ANGCLnS AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: REPORT DATE: MEETING DATE: CASE/FILE NUMBER: APPLICATION REQUEST: PROJECT LOCATION: PROPERTY OWNER: APPLICANT: BACKGROUND: City of Diamond Bar PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report 8.4 January 31, 2001 February 13, 2001 Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-04, and Development Review No. 2000-10 To install two monopoles with two antennas on each pole 'and equipment cabin6t closed by a block wall. 24401 Darrin Drive (Lot 51, Tract No. 42584) Diamond Bar, CA 91789 Eric Stone 24401 Darrin Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91789 Nextel Communications 310 Commerce Irvine, CA 92602 The property owner, Eric Stone and applicant, Nextel Communications are requesting approval of Conditional -Use Permit No. 2000-04, and Development Review No. 2000-10 (pursuant to Code Section 22.58, 22.42.130 and 22.48.020. A.). The request is for approval to install two monopoles, one approximately 25 feet high, the other approximately 30 feet high, with two antennas on each pole and equipment cabinet enclosed by a block wall. The project site is located at 24401 Darrin Drive (Lot 51, Tract No. 42584-). The project site is bordered by the Pomona Freeway 1 (SR 60) on the north, Armitos Place on the south, Golden Springs Drive on the west, Carpio Drive on the southwest and Darrin Drive on the southeast. It is irregular shaped, sloping downward and then sloping upwards toward the northerly property boundary adjacent to the freeway. The project site is approximately 10.05 gross acres (approximately 6.87 net acres). A storm drain easement traverses the project site in a north -south direction taking access from Armitos Place and not within the area of the proposed telecommunication facility. The project site is currently developed with a single family residence approximately 1,400 square feet and a telecommunication facility with three monopoles and a telecommunications equipment cabinet approved by the Planning Commission for Pac Bell and Cox communications in 1998. The General Plan land use designation for the project site is Low Density Residential (RL -Maximum 3 DU/Acre). The zoning designation is Single Family Residence -Minimum Lot Size 10,000 Square Feet (R-1-10',000). Generally, the following zones and use surround the project site:- to the north is the Pomona Freeway (SR 60); to the south is the R-1-10,000 Zone; and`to the west is the fire station and the R-1-10,000 and R-1-8,000 Zones; and to the East is the R-1-10,000 and R-1-8,000 Zones. The proposed project was first presented to the Planning Commission on September 12, 2000. The public hearing was continued twice to September 26, and O'ctober 10, 2000. On October 10, 2000, the Planning Commission approved a resolution of denial (Resolution No. 2000-18) for the project. The Planning Commission denied the project because the proposed monopole antennas appeared to be above the Armitos Place street level, thereby impacting the view of the surrounding neighbors. Additionally, based on information provided by Nextel, the proposed monopoles, exact height and placement was uncertain in relationship to the existing monopoles. The applicant believes that the intent of the Planning Commission's denial decision was to have Nextel provide additional information addressing the Commission's concerns on the plans and resubmit with a new application. In a correspondence dated October 17, 2000, Nextel submitted a - formal request to appeal the Planning Commission's decision of the project's denial. Pursuant to Development Code Section 22.74.040 C., the filing of an appeal allowed City Council to consider any issue involving this project in addition to the specific grounds for the appeal and offered the following options: 1. The City Council may, by resolution, affirmed or affirm in part, or reverse the action, the decision or determination that is the subject of the appeal; K 2. The City Council may adopt additional conditions of approval, that may address other issues or concerns than the subject of the appeal; or 3. If new or different evidence is presented on appeal, the City Council may, but shall not be required to, refer the matter to the Planning Commission for further consideration. The City Council opted to refer the matter back to the Planning Commission for further consideration. Hence, the proposed project that is being presented by this report. ANALYSIS: Conditional Use Permit/ Development Review The purpose of a'Conditional Use Permit is to provide a process for reviewing specified activities and uses identified in a zoning district whose effect on the surrounding area cannot be determined befor*e being proposed for a particular location. Therefore, the review will include location, design, configuration and potential impacts to ensure that the proposed used will protect the pubic health, safety and welfare. Pursuant to the City's Development Code standards for telecommunication facilities, the proposed project does not meet the criteria for an Administrative Review or Minor Conditional Use Permit due to its location in a residential zone (R-1- 10,000), design, concealment and architectural integration As a result, the proposed project requires approval of a Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission. . The City's Development'Code establishes a Development Review process. The purpose of this process is to establish consistency with the General Plan through the promotion of high aesthetic and functional standards to complement and add to the economic, physical, and social character of the City. The process will also ensure that new development and intensification of existing - development yields a pleasant living, working, or shopping environment and attracts the interest of residents, workers, shoppers and visitors as the result of consistent exemplary design. Development Review is within the Planning Commission's review authority. The proposed Nextel telecommunication facility is located adj--acent to the existing Pac Bell and Cox telecommunication facility. The proposed lease area will be approximately 277 square feet and consist of two monopoles with two antennas each, r]. and an equipment cabinet enclosed by a block wall. The monopoles with the antennas will be 25 and 30 feet tall. The antenna poles will be camouflaged painted to match the existing telecommuni- cations facility. The equipment cabinet is approximately 92 square feet and will hold receiving and distribution equipment along With associated batteries and power supply equipment. A block wall varying from 7 to 9.5 feet in height will enclose the cabinet. The wall will also be camouflaged painted to match the wall of the existing telecommunications facility. Chain-link fencing approximately 7.5 feet tall will be atop and inside the wall. Chain-link access gates will be provided. The wall enclosure will also contain two air-conditioning units to service the equipment cabinet. The purposed project will also cause an extension of the existing steps and existing pathway (utilized by Pac Bell and Cox) to the equipment and a new gravel path from the step extension to one of the proposed monopoles. The proposed equipment cabinet area will be located downslope and approximately 86 feet from the ultimate right-of-way of Armitos Place at the 927 -foot elevation. The antennas will be located downslope and approximately 120 feet from the'u'ltimate right-of- way of Armitos Place at the 904.25 and 899.25 foot elevation. The elevation at the street level of Armitos Place is 929.28 feet. The proposed antennas will be 25 and 30 feet tall. Therefore, both antennas will not project above the street level of Armitos Place. A recent site visit indicated that the existing vegetation on the slopes of the project site have effectively obscured the existing telecommunications facility from the street level of Armitos Place. It is anticipated that the existing vegetation will also assist in screening the proposed telecommunications facility. There are 24 -inch box size trees on-site that are a result of the existing facility's approval. Three of the trees will need to be relocated due. to the proposed project's construction. It is required that the trees be relocated in a manner that will effectively screen the existing and proposed telecommunications facility. Additionally, it will be required that all box trees be planted. Furthermore, the applicant will be required to install additional 24 -inch box size trees and five gallons size shrubs to effectively screen the proposed block wall equipment enclosure. It is required that said trees and shrubs be consistent with the existing on-site vegetation. Vegetation destroyed during construction of the proposed project shall be replaced with like vegetation. Maintenance visits to the site may occur once or twice.a month. The maintenance would involve one truck and approximately a two or three hour stay. Therefore, it is expected that the proposed project will generate minimal amount of additional traffic within the neighborhood. 4 The proposed telecommunications facility will not be lighted or produce excessive noise. Therefore, it is not expected that the residential neighborhood will be negatively impacted by the installation of the facility. Pursuant to the City Council's request at the January 16, 2001 public hearing, the applicant is preparing a draft study addressing the need to provide service to various areas of Diamond Bar which are currently considered dark. According to the applicant, the draft study will be available in approximately three months. At that time, the.applicant would like to meet with the City to determine possible locations from a zoning perspective. Following the identification of potential sites, the RF engineers would then carry out drive tests, and compare the evaluation options. The last step will take an additional three months. As a result, the applicant states it is possible that the city would receive a final study in approximately six months. To ensure that the.study will be presented to the City in a timely manner, the city is requiring that the applicant submit the study prior to the issuance of any City permits. Review by other Divisions The City's Public Works and Building and Safety Divisions and the reviewed the proposed project.- Their recommendations are within the draft resolution. Conclusion: The proposed project will generate a minimal amount of additional traffic to the neighborhood by infrequent maintenance visits. It will not create a new source of light and noise. The facility is required to comply with Federal regulations regarding radio frequency emissions. It will not be visible from Armitos Place and will not block the view of the hillside north of the 60 Freeway. The project will be camouflaged painted to match the existing cell facility and additional landscaping will be added. Therefore, it is unlikely that the proposed project will negatively impact the single-family residential neighborhood. Furthermore, the existing cell site operating for approximately - two years does not appear to have negatively impacted the single- family residence. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section 15303(e) and guidelines promulgated thereunder, the City has determined that this project is categorically exempt. 9 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: Notice for this project was published in the Inland Valley Bulletin and the San Gabriel Valley Tribune on January 31, 2001. Public hearing notices were mailed to approximately 106 property owners within a 700-footradius of the project site on January 29, 2001. Furthermore, - t . he - project site - was posted with a display board and public notice was posted in three public places on January 30, 2001. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-04 and Development Review No. 2000-10, Findings of Fact and conditions of.approval as listed within the attached resolution. REQUIRED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS: l.- The proposed use is allowed within the subject zoning district with the approval of a Conditional Use permit/Minor Conditional Use Permit and complies with all other applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Municipal Code; 2. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan; 3. The design, location, size and operation characteristics of the proposed use are compatible with he existing and future land uses in the vicinity; 4. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of use being proposed including access, provision of utilities, compatibility with ' h adjoining land uses and the absence of physical constraints; 5. Granting the Conditional Use Permit/Minor Conditional Use Permit will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity and zoning district in which the property is -located; and 6. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). R REQUIRED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FINDINGS: 1. The design and layout of the proposed development are consistent with the General Plan, City Design Guidelines, development standards of the applicable district, and architectural criteria for special areas, (e.g. theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards, or planned developments); 2. The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future development, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards; 3. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the characteristics of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain and enhance the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22.48 of the City's Development Code, the General Plan, or any applicable specific plan; 4. The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, and color that will remain aesthetically appealing; 5. The proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious (e.g. negative affect on property values or resale(s) " of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 6. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Prepared by: An J. ITungf, `A,0�ciatde Planner 7- 0- N Attachments: 1. Draft Resolution; 2. Exhibit "A" - site plan, sections/elevations and landscape/irrigation plan dated February 13, 2001; and 3. Applications. 1.1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -XX A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2000-04, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 2000-10, AND CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, A REQUEST TO INSTALL TWO MONOPOLES WITH TWO ANTENNAS ON EACH MONOPOLE AND'EQUIPMENT CABINET ENCLOSED BY BLOCK WALL. THE PROJECT SITE IS LOCATED AT 24401 DARRIN DRIVE (LOT 51, TRACT No. 42584) DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA. . A._RECITALS- 1. The property owner, Eric Stone and applicant, Nextel Communications have filed an application for Conditional Use Permit No. 2000- 04, Development Review No. 2000-10 and Categorical Exemption for a property located at 24401 Darrin Drive, Diamond Bar, Los Angeles County, California. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit, Development Review, and Categorical Exemption shall be referred to as the "Appli- cation". 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar on February 13, 2001 conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Application. 3. Notification of the public hearing for this project was provided in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers on January 31, 2001. Public hearing notices were mailed to approximately 106 property owners of record within a 700 -foot radius of the project on January 29, 2001. Furthermore, the project site was posted with display board and the public notice was posted in three public places on January 30, 2001. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: 1.This Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts setJ forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 1 *4P 2. The Planning Commission hereby finds that the project x t: identified above in this Resolution is categorically e ii�� pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970 and guidelines promulgated thereunder, according to Section 15303(e). 3 ..The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds and determines- that, having --considered the record as a whole including the findings'set forth below, and changes and alterations which have been incorporated into and conditioned upon the proposed project set forth in the application, there is no,evidence before this Planning Commission that the project proposed herein will have the potential of an adverse effect on wild life resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Based upon substantial evidence, this Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effects contained in Section 753.5 (d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 4. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein, this Planning Commission hereby finds as follows: (a) The project relates to an irregular shaped lot that slopes down to a canyon and then slopes upward to the northerly property boundary adjacent to the freeway. The project site is approximately 10.05 gross acres (approximately 6.87 net acres). A storm drain easement traverses the project site in a north -south direction taking'access from Armitos Place and not within the area of the proposed telecommunication facility. The project site is currently developed with a single family residence approximately 1,400 square -feet and a telecommunication facility with three monopoles and a telecommunications equipment cabinet approved by the Planning Commission for Pac Bell and Cox communications in 1998. The project site is bordered by the Pomona Freeway (SR 60) on the north, Armitos Place on the south, Golden Springs Drive on the west, Carpio Drive on the southwest and Darrin Drive on the southeast. (b) The General Plan land use designation for the project site is Low Density Residential (RL -Maximum 3 DU/Acre). (c) The zoning designation for the project site is Single Family Residence -Minimum Lot Size 10,000 Square Feet (R- 1-10,000). (d) Generally, the following zones and uses surround the project site: to the north is the'Pomona Freeway (SR 60); to the south is the R-1-10,000 Zone; and to the west and East is the R-1-10,000 and R-1-8,000 Zones. (e) The application request is to install two monopoles with two antennas each, and an equipment cabinet enclosed by 2 a block wall on a proposed lease area of appro `e117 277 square feet. The monopoles with the antennas w e 06 25 and 30 feet tall. The antenna poles will? camouflaged painted to match the existing telecommun714 cations facility. The equipment cabinet is approximately 92 square feet and will hold receiving and distribution equipment. A block wall varying from 7 to 9.5 feet in height will enclose the cabinet. The wall will also be camouflaged painted to match the wall of the exi-sting telecommunications facility. Chain-link fencing approximately 7.5 feet tall will be atop and inside the wall. Chain-link access gates will be provided. The wall enclosure will also contain two air-conditioning units to service the equipment cabinet. The purposed project will also cause an extension of the existing steps and existing pathway (utilized by Pac Bell and Cox) to the equipment and a new gravel path from the proposed step extension to one of the proposed monopoles. Conditional Use Permit (g) The proposed use is allowed within the subject zoning district with the approval of a donditional Use Permit complies with all other applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Municipal Code; The purpose of a Conditional Use Permit is to provide a process for reviewing specified activities and 'uses identified in a zoning district whose effect on the surrounding area cannot be determined before being proposed for a particular location. Therefore, the review will include location, design, configuration and potenti_&l impacts to ensure that the proposed ' used will protect the pubic health, safety and welfare. Pursuant to the City's Development Code standards for telecommunication facilities, the proposed project does not meet the criteria for an Administrative Review or Minor *Conditional Use.Permit due to its location in a residential zone (R-1-10,000), design, concealment and architectural integration.. As a result, the proposed project requires approval of a Conditional Use Permit - by the Planning Commission. (h) The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan; The project site has a General Plan land use designation of Low Density Residential (RL -Maximum 3 DU/Acre). Objectives and Strategies of the General Plan encourage the establishment of new technology that are deemed environmentally safe and compatible with development. The proposed project is required to comply with Federal 91 regulations regarding radio frequency emissionseby considered environmentally safe. The proposed proj r 10 compatible with the General plan in that it willgaener a minimal amount of additional traffic to thzl?` neighborhood by infrequent maintenance visits. It will not create a new source of light and noise. It will not be visible from Armitos Place and will not block the view of the hillside north of the 60 Freeway. A specific plan does not exist for the project site or area. The design, location, size and operation characteristics of the proposed use are compatible with the.existing and future land uses in the vicinity; The project site is approximately 10.05 gross acres (approximately 6.87 net acres) and developed with a 1,400 square foot single-family home and existing telecommunications facility (approved by the Planning Commission in 1998) approximately the same size as the proposed facility. The proposed telecommunications facility will utilize approximately 277 square feet of the project site. Considering the size of the project site and the lot area required to -install the proposed telecommunications facility, it is clear that the project site can accommodate the proposed project. The proposed project will generate a minimal amount of additional traffic to the neighborhood by infrequent maintenance visits. It will not create a new source of light and noise. The facility is required to comply with Federal regulations regarding radio frequency emissions. It will not be visible from Armitos Place and will not block the view of the hillside north of the 60 ---Freeway. The project will be'camouflaged painted to match the existing cell facility and additional landscaping will be added. It is anticipated that the existing vegetation- will also assist in screening the proposed telecommunications facility. Therefore, it is unlikely that the proposed project will negatively impact the single-family residential neighborhood. Furthermore, the existing cell site operating for approximately two years does not appear to have negatively impacted the single-family residence. Therefore, the project's design, location, size and operational characteristics, as conditioned, will be compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of use being proposed including access, provision of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses and the absence of physical constraints; M As referenced above in Item (i), the proposed pt meets the required development standards for thqepl... R 10,000 zone. As such, it is compatible with adjoin' ' I %Oc% land uses. Provisions for utilities exist at the project site. (k) Granting the Conditional Use Permit will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety,, convenience, or welfare, or injurious to persons,— property, ersons,property, or improvements in the vicinity and zoning district in which the property is located; As referenced above in Items (g) through (i), the proposed project, as conditioned, will meet the City's minimum development standards. Traffic will be minimal. With the issuance of the appropriate permits and required compliance with Federal regulations regarding radio frequency emissions, it is expected that granting the Conditional Use Permit will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity and zoning district in which the property is located. (1) The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section 15303(e) and guidelines promulgated thereunder, the City has determined that this project is categorically exempt. Development Review (m) The design and layout of the* proposed development are consistent with the General Plan, City Design Guidelines, development standards of the applicable district, and architectural criteria for special areas, (e.g. theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards, or planned developments); As referenced above in Items (g), (h), (i) and (j), the proposed project is consistent with the City's Design Guidelines, development standards of the applicable district, and architectural criteria for special areas. Additionally, a specified architectural criteria for the area does not exist. (n) The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future development, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards; 5 14P As referenced in items (i) and W above, it is i�� expected that the design and layout of the proposed project will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future development, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. (o) The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the characteristics of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain and enhance the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22.48 of the City's Development Code, the General Plan, or any applicable specific plan; As referenced in Item (i) above, the architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the characteristics of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain and enhance the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22.48 of the City's Development Code, the General Plan, or any applicable specific plan. , (p) The.'design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, and color that will remain aesthetically appealing; As referenced above in Item (i), it is expected that the design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, and color that will remain aesthetically appealing. (q) The proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious (e.g. negative affect on property values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity; As referenced in Items (i) and W above, the proposed project is not expected to be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious (e.g. negative affect on property values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. 5. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth above, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Application subject to the following conditions: 0 (a) The project shall substantially conform to a:9sipl ) e plan, sections/elevations, and final landscape/ irrigation plan, collectively labeled as Exhibit 'W'� dated February 13, 2001, as submitted, amended herein and approved by the Planning commission. (b) The site shall be maintained in a condition which is free of debris both during and after the construction, addition, or implementation of the entitlement granted herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether during or subsequent to construction shall be done only by the property owner, applicant or by a duly permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste from residential, commercial, construction, and industrial areas within the City. It shall be the applicant's obligation to insure that the waste contractor utilized has obtained permits from the City of Diamond Bar to provide such services. (c) Prior to the issuance of any City permits, the applicant shall submit a final'landscape/irrigation plan for the city's review and approval. Said plan shall: (1) (2) (3) ME Delineate the relocation site of the three 24 -inch box size trees that require relocated due to the proposed project's construction; said trees shall, be relocated in a manner that will effectively screen the existing and proposed telecommunications facility; All boxed trees shall be planted; Additional 24' -inch box size trees and five gallons size shrubs shall be planted to effectively screen the proposed block wall equipment enclosure; said trees and shrubs shall be consistent with the existing on-site vegetation; and Vegetation destroyed during construction shall be replaced with like vegetation. (d) Prior to final inspection, property owner/applicant shall remove all debris/trash that exists within the project site area. (e) Property owner/applicant shall remove the public hearing notice board within three days of this project's approval. (f) To ensure compliance with and applicable codes, the shall be subject to period compliance with conditions Planning Commission may re 16 all conditions of approval Conditional Use Permit review. If non - of approval occurs, the view the Conditional Use Permit. The Commission may revoke or modify Conditional Use Permit. (g) Prior to the issuance of the building permit, t e application shall submit a study addressing the need to provide service to various areas of Diamond Bar which are currently considered dark. (h) Prior -to the issuance of any City permits, the applicant shall submit retaining wall plans and calculations for the City's review and approval. (i) Prior to construction, the applicant shall install temporary construction fencing pursuant to the Building and Safety Division's requirements along the project perimeter. (j) All stairways leading to equipment shall have handrails and guardrails per Building Code requirements. (1) Plans shall conform to State and Local Building Code (i.e. 1998 'Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, 1998 National Electrical Code and State Energy Code) requirements. (m) All cables shall be installed underground. (n) Construction plans shall be engineered to meet wind loads of 80 M.P.H. with a "C" exposure. (o) This grant is valid for two years and shall be exercised (i.e. construction started) within that period or this grant shall expire. A one-year extension of time for this application may be approved when submitted to the City in writing at least 60 days prior to the expiration date. The Planning Commission will consider the extension request at a duly noticed public hearing in accordance with Chapter 22.72 of the City of Diamond Bar Development Code. (p) This grant shall not be effective for any purpose until the permittee and owner of the property involved (if other than the permittee) have filed, within fifteen (15) days of approval of this grant, at the City of Diamond Bar Community and Development Services Department, their affidavit stating that they are aware of and agree to accept all the conditions of this grant. Further, this grant shall not be effective until the permittee pays remaining City processing fees, school fees and fees for the review of submitted reports. 40 (q) If the Department of Fish and Game determines thP401 Fish and Game Code Section 711.4 applies to the 401:,, approval of this project, then the applicant shall remit to the City, within five days of this grant's approval, a cashier's check of $25.00 for a documentary handling fee in connection with Fish and Game Code requirements. Furthermore, if this project is not exempt from a filing fee imposed because the project has more than a deminimis impact on fish and wildlife, the applicant shall also pay to the Department of Fish and Game any such fee and any fine which the Department determines to be owed. The Planning Commission shall: (a) *Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and (b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, to: Eric Stone, 24401 Darrin Drive, Diamond Bar, CA and Nextel Communications, 310 Commerce, Irvine, CA 92602. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH OF FEBRUARY 2001, BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. WA Steve Nelson, Chairman I, J . ames DeStefano, planning commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar, at a regular meeting of the Planning commission held on the 13th day of February 2001, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: James DeStefano, Secretary 4 ��11LL'►lli.�'II Ii�h C Record Owner CITY OF DIAMOND BAR _ DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY do DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Planning Division 21660 E. Copley Drive Suite 190, Diamomd Bar, CA 91765 (949)396-5676 Fax (909)961.3117 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION Name - ?Oz,(-: GA:1 L . (Last name fast) 1 Address 4 `�y4i / )�.�i. )A—:- J)X City .� iHnt e c n F�Av2 .Zip ---ll 7 L S Phone c* �-b C Z t{ Fax ( ) Applicant ,, (L/as't name snit) ,J/V r. G12./crZ Pbone(/7� 2.,j' �,S' Fax 'G) f 13 S b Case k FFL Lt, ' USE Appluant's Agent (Last name firsi) 6f ? i, j c'' Phone* Z-7 9- 2 s 7 j' Far (*. V -2c) /3 o NOTE: 1t ofir' f this case. a applicant's responsibility 10 notify Processing otate City in writing of any change of the principals involved during the (Attach separate sheet, if necessary, including names, aesses corporations.) ddr� and agrehaes of members of parmerzWps.loint ventures, and directors of Consent I ce that I am the owner the herein described ro perry and permit the applicant to file this request Sipa / rd owners) Date__��� Lertilicaknowledge I, the uordersigneo� hereby cer best of my ofy under penalty ojperjury that floe information herein provided is torted to the k Print Name (Applicant of Agent) Signed — z; - . 'IS,/— or Agent) Location 7 7O (sheet address of 6Y 192ia,da Date 6 %jam"• �% : ' Mwa aua ivt number) Zoning House Numbering map /7o, !•/ Previous Cases Present Use of Site elk.' ; fi t ra A. JJ &.--V Use applied for ,u ; io,v 1 City ofDiamond Bar CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Project Size (Laws acres) 1 Project Density Previous Cases Present Use of Site �* �+-% • N.�:-� L� i 7cGE .� u .�:: r �",c for Domestic Water Source 'Company/District Method of Sewage Disposal/ Sanitation District Grading of Lots by Applicant? YES NO ✓ Amount (Show necessary grading design on site plan or tent. map) Page Two - Cl JITIONAL USE PERMIT BURDEN OF P, )F.. I :J In addition to the information required in the application, the applicant shall substantiate to 6"tisfaction of tiie Planning Commission, the following facts: (answers must be full & complete) 1 1?3 _ . A. That the requested use at the location proposed will not: 1. Adversely affect the health, peace, comfort or welfare of persons residing or working in the surrounding area, or 2. Be materially detrimental to the use, enjoyment or valuation of property of other persons located in the vicinity of the site, or 3. Jeopardize, endanger or otherwise constitute a menace to the pubrlic, health. safety or general welfare. '�t �.� C'o-►,.+ 6v-i�"h �[� C vz�'c� ct„-rJT'L,.-..� �-u• l.lc-=9 sa-/%.:7 � K,i ..ii. •L:h.y ..... -�•ti is (i�' ,..tn 'tom ' B. That the proposed site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, landscaping and other development features prescribed in this Title 22, or as is otherwise required in order to integrate said use with the -uses in the surrounding area. C. That the proposed site is adequately served: 1. By highways or streets of sufficient width and improved as necessary to carry the kind and quantity of traffic such use, would generate, and 2. By other publicor private service facilities as are required. ca ryt/' ' AW -t 4--� J Residential: Total Units . Z: TotA Pkg. Project Size: Bachelor I Bedroom Cov. Pkg. Uncov. Pkg. Lot Coverage: 2 Bdrm. & larger Density: Maximum Height: No. of floors: Sq. Footage bion -residential: Sq. ft. area No. of Bldgs. Occupant Load* CUP Burden of Proof - Page I Parking: Total Standard Compact Handicap Landscaping: Sq. feet Grading: Y _ N _ If yes, Quantity: Cut: Fill: Import: Y _ N _ If yes, Quantity:. Export: Y _ N _. If yes, Quantity: * Occupant Load as calculated by the Building & Safety Division is required for all dining, take-out or assembly use, churches, health clubs, theaters, etc. LEGAL DESCRIPTI.O�N ((all ownership / comprising the proposed lots)/parcel(s) Area devoted to structures Landscaping/Open spaces Residential Project: and (gross area) (No. of lots) Proposed density (Units/Acres) Parking RequiredProvided Standard Compact Handicapped Total Conditional Use Permit Burden of Proof - Page 2 Staff Use Project No INITIAL STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE (to be completed by applicant) A. GENERAL INFORMATION Project Applicant (Owner): Project Representative: .a NAME NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS _ -� ' y� c� - 5 v� �.r•��r' y 4 �1 PHONE # AX# PtiONE # TAM Action requested and project description: 4�t �yi9•�-Lc=� i c'�%FC�.ry, 122�, 2. Street location of project: 3. Present use of site: 144, 4w4-u� &T 4. Previous use of site or structures: S. Project Description a. Site Size (total b. Square Footage (covered by structures, paving C. Number of floors of construction d. Amount of off-street parldng provided C. Landscaping, open space f. Propose scheduling ILH g. Associated projects 2' liq — h. Anticipated incremental development "(,Ih) Liitial Study Queakunim - Pap l 6 7 a If residential, includ number of units, schedule of unit sizes Owl ale prices or rents and type of bow-"oi-' size expected) j, if commercial, indicate the , whether neighborbood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales arta and loading facilities. A/ 1s If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per AM and loading facilities 1. if institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy. loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. M. If the project involves a variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state this and indicate clearh• wby the application is required. r Please list all previous cases (if any) related to this project: List related permit/approvals required. Specify type and granting agency. 8. Are you planning future phases of this project? If yes, explain: 9. Present zoning: Y N / 10. Water and sewer service: Domestic Public ®Vater Sewers Imes service exist at site? Y— N— Y N — If yes, do purveyors have capacity to meet demand of project nd all other approved projects? Y ®; N ® Y N Dial Study QUGWwmim • Page 2 If domestic water or public se are not available, how will these services be ided^ I I . Residential Projects: a. Number and type of units: b. Floor area of each unit: C. Number of floors d. Schools: What school district(s) serves the property? Are existing school facilities adequate to meet project needs? YES NO if not, what provisions will be made for additional classrooms? 12. Non-residential projects: (commercial,, industrial, institutional) a. Distance to -nearest residential use or sensitive use (school, hospital, etc.) b. Number and floor area of buildings: C.- Number of employees and shifts: d. Maximum employees per shift: C. Operating hours: f Community benefit to be derived from project: g. Identify any: End products Wage products Means of disposal h. Do project operations use, store or produce hazardous aubstanoes such as oil, pesticides, chemicals, paints, or radioactive materials? YES NO If yes, explain Initial Study Quadiomahv - Page 3 i. Ido your operations require any pressurized tanks? YES NO t: f If yes, explain j. Identify any flammable, reactive or explosive materials to be located on-site. k. Will delivery or shipment trucks travel through residential areas to reach the nearest highway? �r If yes, explain YES NO 13. Associated Projects 14. Anticipated incremental development 15. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of twit sizes 16. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neigbborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area and loading facilities. 17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities 18. If institutional, indicate the major finctioa, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. B. ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION (to be completed by applicant) 1. Envuonmentai Setting—Project Site ' 4 L Existing use/stmetwts /��' m 9 N^' i`T / t/c cf rn /r' t� V, r C , /, b. Topograpby/slopes 16 *c. Vegetation *d. Animals *c. Watercourses f. CulturaVhistorical resourge i1/� g. Other 2. Environmental Setting— Surrounding Area a. Existing uses structures (types, densities): 4 / J/ �+-'_c� /! w P �v E�1DrAr-G b. Topograpby/slopes 2s: *c. Vegetation Al *d. Animals Initial SUWY Quaaioteaim - Pale 5 °c. Watercourses 11 f Cultural/historical resources -IV/ g. Other " Answers are not required if the area does not contain natural, undeveloped land. 3. Are there any major trees on the site, including oak imus, walnut trees, sycamore. CaliforniaPepper and armyo willow? YES NO If yes, type and number: 4 Will any natural watercourses, sur ace flow patterns, etc., be changed through project development?: If yes, explain: YES NO 5. Grading: Will the project require. grading?.. YES NO -- If yes, how many cubic yards? Will it be balanced on-site? YES NO If not balanced, where will dirt be obtained or, deposited? ' 6. Are there any identifiable Landslides or other major geologic hazards out the property (including uncompacted fill)? YFS ® NO If yes, explain: 7. Is the property located within a high fire hazard area (hillsides whit moderately dense vegetation)? YES NO Distance to nearest fire station: S. Noise: Existing noise sources at site: Ile 'yG Noise or vibration to be generated by project: AIIc 9. Fumes: Odors generated by project: �e Could toxic fumes be generated? 'IV o •vC 10. Dust: i Dust, ash, or smoke generated by project: 11. What energy -conserving designs or material will be used? I hereby certW that the statements furnished above and in the attacbed exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. .�/ � lez) �6— 4x— Date signature For: insist Study Quetiomuim - Pop 7 ( � COMMUNTT' EVELOPMENT DEPARTAfNT 21660 E. Copley Drive Suite 190 (909)396-5676 Fax (909)861-3117 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION Record Owner Applicant Name _ 'T ,rVL-'�f (LAst name firs[) Address,,I" i/oj_ City IH»te t. 0 Q42 Phone(JJ 1? y �L--{ % L= L_ `•c Nim � 1% r (,'> 7.�rs (Last name first) r - / r-, 4L C L6c c; Z.. Phone(`7j 71 Deposit S I Receipt# By Date Rec'd Applicant's Agent (Last name first) ���F �-4°ter• PhoneftJ Z J- 7JI NOTE: It is the applicant's responsibility to notify the Community Development Director in writing of any change of the principals involved during the processing of this case. • - (Attach a separa sheet, if of corporations / names, addresses, and signatures of members of partnerships, joint ventures, and directors properly and permit the applicant to file this request. Date CQ - a c - 00 alty of perjury that the Wormation herein provided is correct (Applicant or Agent signeded Z ,. G'-- '`� Dace G" y 'U e--' (Applicant or Agent) Location 02- 7yG+ I dJCk 21L i i✓ �oC . (Street addresi or tract and lot number) Zoning +►�"- '— �.Ovu HNM Previous Cases Present Use of Site 7;v)-�_r i Use applied for 4e0-- ;m i4 ,"C lc L' -4; N, ; , A- , e /-7-74-rZ _ moi• ` Area devoted to structures Landscaping/Open apace Project Size Lot Coverage Proposed density, (Units/Acres) Style of Architecture Number of Floors Proposed Slope of Roof Grading:.......If yes, Quantity Cut Fill Import If yes, Quantity Export If yes, Quantity a i TREE PRESERVATION STATEMENT [,4 -'--The subject property contains no oak, walnut, sycamore, willow, or naturalized California Pepper trees. [ ] The subject property contains one or more oak, walnut, sycamore, willow;-or— naturalized California Pepper trees. The applicant anticipates that no activity (grading and/or construction) will take place within five (5) feet of the outer dripline of any oak, walnut, sycamore, willow, or naturalized California Pepper tree. [ ] The subject property contains one or more oak, walnut, sycamore, willow, or naturalized California Pepper trees. The applicant states that activity (grading and/or construction) wW take place within five (5) feet of the outer dripline of any oak, walnut, sycamore, willow, or naturalized California Pepper tree. A Tree Permit has been or will be applied for prior to any activity taking place on the property. 0 (Applicant's Signature; (Date) MWOM NDATORMSMME SfA'rWWT r� t R s..8 ms Oma �s 0S m €� D O m m N m V j N m y PH g O O oae€�gmm9s"tea=r ms W °='9�� �- g a o�� 2 b ' m° RE -G° gA g m�>�N°m ga�t�om�Ra3 00 3 � gMEa o r E: 3EN N°w o> ono m ging N rnv� cr'��=�'� - a� F� m 0 aN90 9Ngp ff�a= �oo X a m O € sa oA ;P20—�'a� iquiago no Eo2 om 8 m -Rn mp9E tp, l9g-m Mats w t R s..8 ms Oma �s 0S m €� D O m m N m V j N m y PH g O O °gg aa'2 r_ j m H.a g ny r m � t §sm o C - _ s"s Yo o> ono m .,' N D ' ImI m > € ° X a m o a t R s..8 ms Oma �s 0S m €� D O m m N m V j N m y PH g O O 0 ''a 0ej0o s � m y�i g ny r m � o v o> ono m .,' N D ' ImI m t R s..8 ms Oma �s 0S m €� D O m m N m V j N m y PH g O O 0 ''a 0ej0o s � m y�i g ny r m � o v o> ono -G .,' N -0 ' ImI m z € ° X a m o a t R s..8 ms Oma �s 0S m €� D O m m N m V j N m y PH g O O 0 J m � o o> ono � as o € A A J m m € m z € ° X N o t R s..8 ms Oma �s 0S m €� D O m m N m V j N m y PH g O O J s s o> ono � _ t p � �o N o N i p Zn c -u C- g9 YXz m m � aN.i m O Z o o m R D )PF -m n - 9� �m Z73 C7 t R s..8 ms Oma �s 0S m €� D O m m N m V j N m y PH g O O J s s o> ono s(y) _ t p T �o N g i-Oo v im n 44,4/A as �� ~ /y�• T oz sly o F�4 �a€ 'pJeo V `OY- ill" 1 �y Il a it I r�� / 'F.! m y A - ! -mi m qua �3. do r9r iN y 14 0 0 a A wI ! 1 to ! S12)9'I0• , ' M 119.29 J A y fit / � / � P'• p aP / o / ' o�q,, � .�`���. `+`/~/^`'moi, /..,.,�`_ /(r//�•^ '� ' i/ •cam qa ,6<` � / OA�```�. .. J ,i9 / _ p . a /A. R9 D o� 2 pNg uvo.♦ ma 0> a= /. z 5z 0 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY • "N.F'XTEL COMMUNICATIONS SITE NO. 6710B "PHILLIPS RANCH" Joy ENG 24401 DARRIN DRIVE Ixw+[, al.raane 92ccz w,o sm�wc s ou rtn 1�¢nme DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA 91765-1849 FAY (TI)xA 10 i"nn �e'f�mn �aiaaam�- m N m m N m N T S m ti T . '��� '�` '�• z o C 1 I I. ,;-_ q•;; ��, �-� � �=;11i � ! ,� I (�,,� ,lei i'��,, � I ! L� 1 �� �� IL� i,,i ,. `4 s..•.t.^"'_"...-��^---!r- , � � 1 I� i i i I � i �, (� 1 11'. I I'. •: I I I +. ��� ' I rI ''`, %'-_--"----_✓•" —�_� II: � I(i �� {I I'� II ISI! li'I Ii It oll I �•.. �•� ` ,----_'�'� �,� ( I'I + SII I�Vi �II� � I�( ��li���,/ � I I I f � I I • � ' 'i II !I {i I�� II ; jiii it I I it j`ii SII ;Iii II.I __��r� -i-:-•_�_� •i I I�l ��1• I� � Via' I�� �II� (� `I If (IIS ' � ��I, j�;i it�1 J, � 1 j , j j � I i I I ;'��� `f '�, ,o-i/� J �� (II + F), :_11hA�'�� !'i I��1 I�rl1 •1.1! i;l ({; Ili; ; ��/ ;/,i; /,; ' I�r it I 'i „� i' �-/ ice:.\ „!� ''I I' � � Ij' I � t �-� ',i¢Ii1.I1�I°I III i1i+ I`II I•`' II{ I 'I' / j f/�!j' i j! ';/ / J 11 li 'tae�N$�/, i �l/Jrro �'�ll�'r ��il %( I�`� �� Ijl.l SII°'j�l illi__---��; I% /'/;� //' '�.%�,, i•; % I' , •i � �a ';,;;;ice ° "f.:����gr;l/,,!,,;�; ,;, j�,��1 ,_.���, //• rir�, � �=,�,j,:;��9t � r / I / r-------- ---} - / f •111 � I''\ (IIS / � / j I fir' �i 1 `1, �_I�• C% • 0� TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY Fm��Bri (ru ¢ SITE NO. 67108 "PHILLIPS RANCH" NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS DQ R JID CouuEIKE - wro Suevf,ulc < aet rc xmnec 24401 DARRIN DRIVE DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA 91765-1849 rix mg . xa. _ons nxscxwmw er RE. 5 I / Y / // I / II // ams � f A� N m 'O u ^S a n Egoy e s uap�� y V ZIP ON N LI � L• \`\\•\ /rye/' / fse'p-, � 11 1 / IIf I. 11 �I .E Ii 1 a 1 1 jr ii 1/ ,3 / Y / // I / II // ams � f A� N m 'O u ^S a n Egoy e s uap�� y V L, G79 J} m.P m 3T j O t0 �9 �im�a � r / VV \ O O P 2 Z O e –E gm ym r m 0 , pp mFge F 4 bio i �g ass, �$ ° GAg9N. a€�gg g 3 rn $ kk a a Y� OPw .'I . �4i.".P 1t¢ OpQU. A4i'•iS �a i A — 88g HM A V e ,ung aa° ;31 MIN ;R'� • �� xod �8 �$ '4"� Gig -P �Y• �"o ��6��. � o I. x 9 N m N .amu •'O m —� . C) m z 0 — I- N — 0 ID CD > z > z °O d tTj n C) E; vd� a O rn 0 z gOZ o p s O = > z z 0 0 CD ;IV Q CL CD 0 :3 0 n :::1 CD CD t -j > O 0 0 CN) 0 6 6 M > z z 60 o6 rn C a t -j z O 0 0 C/) C/) DO cn z z C C) C) CO 0 0 C) M m z �4 C� C/) 0 z Lh uj C� z 00 00 00 00 U 00 cn CD 4� I C')r.-) > > Co °O tTj 0 'T, 0 F4 b 9 0 p s = ID 0 0 CD ;IV Q CL CD 0 :3 0 n :::1 CD CD H l7 Z M > z z z CO 0 0 C) M m z �4 C� 0 z Lh uj 00 00 00 00 U 00 tri O cn (n TJ H z z tQ t -j t,j 1 O rn C1 on U.) wn on C, w tQ Q T 7 ET 1> 90 - Ej. CD 0 C) 0 C) 0 0 -0 m 5 Z C) CA 1 0 C/) 6 C) cn > cn t� > U) En > C) 0 X- C) �A —3 C-0 M 'a CA C4 CD CN CD 0 C) 0 C) 0 0 4 1 0 6 6 CD CN � C17 r o z �. o C/) z C) 0 0 0 0 C tri cn C4 co cn w cn CA —Z —Z 2 C) C) C) 1 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING AND AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF DIAMOND BAR On February 13, 2001, at 7:00 P.M., the Diamond Bar Planning Commission will hold a regular meeting at the South Coast Quality Management District Auditorium, 21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California. Items for consideration are listed on the attached agenda. 1, Stella Marquez, declare as follows: I am employed by the City of Diamond Bar, Community and Development Services Department. On February 9, 2001, 1 caused to be posted a copy of the Notice for the Regular Meeting of the Diamond Bar Planning Commission, to be held on February 13, 2001, by directing City Clerk's office to post the Notice at the following location: City Hall 21660 E. Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on February -12, 2001, at Diamond Bar, California. 9.6LJA- Stella Marquez Community and Development Services Dept. gA\affldavitposdng.doc CITY OF DIAMOND BAR NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING AND AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING R31q j�9{4�b'�� STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ) On February 13, 2001, at 7:00 P.M., the Diamond Bar Planning Commission will hold a regular meeting at the South Coast Quality Management District Auditorium, 21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California. Items for consideration are listed on the attached agenda. I, Stella Marquez, declare as follows: I am employed by the City of Diamond Bar, Community and Development Services Department. On February 9, 2001, I caused to be posted a copy of the Notice for the Regular Meeting of the Diamond Bar Planning Commission, to be held on February 13, 2001, by directing Los Angeles County Sheriff Voluntary Patrol to post the Notice at the following location: South Coast;QualiV06ty-Mpna�` �`i'1)Jh nQt Auditorium 21865 East Copley l voio'�41, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on February 12, 2001, at Diamond Bar, California. Stella Marquez Community and Development Services Dept. g:\\affi davi tposting.doc File,ayi2tff,d ft FRR efl'NiTA o Robert S. Huff Mayor Carol Herrera Mayor Pro Tem Eileen R. Ansari Council Member Wen Chang Council Member Deborah H. O'Connor Council Member Recycled paper City of Diamond Bar 21660 E. Copley Drive, Suite 100 • Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4177 (909) 860-2489 - Fax (909) 861-3117 www.CityofDiamondBar.com SPECIAL MEETING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Diamond Bar City Council will hold a special joint meeting with the Diamond Bar Planning Commission on Tuesday, February 13, 2001, at 6:00 p.m., for the purpose of discussing the following: 1. UPDATE ON DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMMUNITY/SENIOR CENTER/LIBRARY PROJECT SAID MEETING will be held in Room CC -2 of the South Coast Air Quality Management District, 21865 E. Copley Dr., Diamond. Bar, California 91765. The public is invited to attend. FURTHER INFORMATION may be obtained at the Office of the City Clerk or by calling (909) 860-2489. DATED: February 8, 2001 /s/ Lynda Burgess Lynda Burgess, City Clerk City of Diamond Bar MEETING DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: CITY COUNCIL REPORT AGENDA ,NO. February 13, 2001 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission James DeStefano, Interim City Mana Status* Report on the progress of. the Community / Senior Center and Library Project During the' first half of 1999, the City Council appointed a Task Force to make recommendations to the City Council regarding the development of a Civic Center / Community Center and Library. At the conclusion of its work, the Task Force. recommended four possible sites for the project. The City Council engaged the services of Economic Research Associates to undertake a fiscal analysis of these four sites. That report was completed, in December 1999. Summit Ridge Park, owned by the City of Diamond Bar, was selected as the preferred site. The site is approximately twenty-six (26) acres in size. Twelve of the acres are developed parkland. Fourteen of the acres are undeveloped. Recently, the City was deeded three hundred sixty (360) acres of land located immediately adjacent to the park. The proposed pads for the Community / Senior Center and the Library would utilize a newly created Grand Avenue access drive. The Council has awarded a design services contract to Gonzales/Goodale Architects to prepare site planning and massing plans for these community facilities. In addition: the engagement includes the preparation of architectural drawings for the Community and Senior Center. The City has contracted with Bonterra Consulting to prepare the necessary environmental documentation for the park site. The Council has set aside funding for the Community / Senior project. A public meeting was held on November 15, 2000 to provide the community with a report on the progress to date and an opportunity to provide comments to assist the City consultant for use in the preparation of the environmental documentation for the project. Several client / architect meetings have been held as the architects have begun their work. The City Council has directed its staff to pursue library funding in order to bring the project to reality. City representatives have met with the Los Angeles County Librarian, representatives of the State Librarians office and our local legislators in an effort to receive funding for the project. We will continue to work toward the submittal of an application for State Library Bond funding for the project. City Council Status Report February 13, 2001 Page 2 In the future discussions will be held with the school districts in order to develop a school program for the facility, which will address the needs of all Diamond Bar residents. The architects will provide the City Council and Planning Commission with a presentation of the site planning work completed to date (see attached site plan). The joint study session of the City Council and Planning Commission is designed to review the site plan, discuss the commencement of the next phase of the design process and to review the project schedule. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council and Planning Commission receive a presentation from staff and consultants and direct staff as appropriate. Attachments Site plan rn�7ra oa vinnoei iv o�,nva aea nv�a N V 8 0 N 0 H V 1 0 ! 0 A 1 1 0 — A N v N 1 1 l a N Y N 3 1 N 3 0 A l I N N K N 0 0 31YHd H01130-311 3 H 0 11 d 0-N Y l a 3 1 I 1