HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/23/2001PLANNING FILE Copy
COMMISSION
South Coast Air Quality Management District
Auditorium
21865 East Copley Drive
Diamond Bar, CA.
Chairman
Vice Chairman
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Steve Nelson
Bob Zirbes
George Kuo
Joe Ruzicka
Steve Tye
Copies of staff reports or other written documentation relating to agenda items are on file in the Planning
Division of the Dept of Community & Development Services, located at 21660 E. Copley Drive, Suite 190,
and are available for public inspection. If you have questions regarding an agenda item, please call
(909) 396-5676 during regular business hours.
In an effort to comply with the requirements of Title // of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the City of
Diamond Bar requires that any person in need of any type of special equipment, assistance or
accommodation(s) in order to communicate at a City public meeting must inform the Dept of Community &
Development Services at (909) 396-5676 a minimum of 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting.
Please refrain from smoking, eating or The City of Diamond Bar uses recycled paper
drinking in the Auditorium and encourage.6 you to do the same
City of Diamond Bar
Planning Commission
PUBLIC INPUT
The meetings of the Diamond Bar Planning Commission are open to the public. A member of the public may
address the Commission on the subject of one or more agenda items and/or other items of which are within the
subject matter jurisdiction of the Diamond Bar Planning Commission. A request to address the Commission
should be submitted in writing at the public hearing, to the Secretary of the Commission.
As a general rule, the opportunity for public comments will take place at the discretion of the Chair. However,
in order to facilitate the meeting, persons who are interested parties for an item may be requested to give their
presentation at the time the item is called on the calendar. The Chair may limit individual public input to five
minutes on any item; or the Chair may limit the total amount of time allocated for public testimony based on the
number of people requesting to speak and the business of the Commission.
Individuals are requested to conduct themselves in a professional and businesslike manner. Comments and
questions are welcome so that all points of view are considered prior to the Commission making
recommendations to the staff and City Council.
In accordance with State Law (Brown Act), all matters to be acted on by the Commission must be posted at least
72 hours prior to. the Commission meeting. In case of emergency or when a subject matter arises subsequent to
the posting of the agenda, upon making certain findings, the Commission may act on item that is not on the
posted agenda.
INFORMATION RELATING TO AGENDAS AND ACTIONS OF THE COMMISSION
Agendas for Diamond Bar Planning Commission meetings are prepared by the Planning Division of the
Community and Development Services Department. Agendas are available 72 hours prior to the meeting at City
Hall and the public library, and may be accessed by personal computer at the number below.
Every meeting of the Planning Commission is recorded on cassette tapes and duplicate tapes are available for a
nominal charge.
ADA REQUIREMENTS
A cordless microphone is available for those persons with mobility impairments who cannot access the public
speaking area. The service of the cordless microphone and sign language interpreter services are available by
giving notice at least three business days in advance of the meeting. Please telephone (909) 396-5676 between
8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday.
HELPFUL PHONE NUMBERS
Copies of Agenda, Rules of the Commission, Cassette Tapes of Meetings (909) 396-5676
Computer Access to Agendas (909) 860 -LINE
General Agendas (909) 396-5676
email: info@ci.diamond-bar.ca.us
PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
Tuesday, January 23, 2001
CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Next Resolution No. 2001-05
1. ROLL CALL: COMMISSIONERS: Chairman Steve Nelson, Vice Chairman
Bob Zirbes, George Kuo, Joe Ruzicka, and Steve Tye.
2. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS:
This is the time and place for the general public to address the members of the Planning
Commission on any item that is within their jurisdiction, allowing the public an opportunity to
speak on non-public hearing and non -agenda items. Please complete a Speaker's Card for the
recording Secretary (Completion of this form is voluntary) There is a five-minute maximum
time limit when addressing the Planning Commission.
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Chairman
4. CONSENT CALENDAR:
The following items listed on the consent calendar are considered routine and are approved by
a single motion. Consent calendar items maybe removed from the agenda by request of the
Commission only:
4.1 Minutes: January 9, 2001.
5. OLD BUSINESS: None.
6. NEW BUSINESS: None.
g:\zste11a\agenda\jan23 01.doc
January 23, 2001 Page 2 Planning Commission
7.1 _Conditional Use Permit No 2000-02, and Development Review No. 2000-20
(pursuant to Code Sections 22.58.020, 22.42.130 G, and 22.48.020) are requests to co
locate a telecommunications facility on an existing monopole approved on January 25,
1993, by Conditional Use Permit No. 92-11. The request also includes an equipment
cabinet and utility pedestal within a concrete pad for both. (Continued from January 9,
2000)
Project Address: Diamond Bar High School
21400 Pathfinder Road
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
Property Owner: Walnut Valley Unified School District
880 South Lemon Avenue
Walnut, CA 91789
Applicant: Metricom, Inc.
1460 East 33rd Street
Signal Hill, CA 90807
Environmental Determination: Pursuant to the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section 15301(b), the City has determined that
this project is categorically exempt.
Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission re -open the
public hearing, receive testimony, and then select from the following options: 1) Close
the public hearing and direct staff to prepare a resolution of approval or denial to be
presented to the Commission at its next regular meeting for adoption; or 2) Continue the
public hearing to a date certain and direct the applicant to provide the staff with
appropriate information.
7.2 Development Review No. 2000-15 (Pursuant to Code Section 22.48.020) is a request
to construct a two-story, single-family residence, of approximately 9,471 square feet,
with a basement, balconies, porch, and a three -car, 1,546 square foot garage.
Additionally, the request includes an accessory gazebo structure containing
approximately 400 square feet under roof. (Continued from December 12, 2000)
Project Address: 1819 Derringer Lane
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
Commissiong
January 23, 2001 Page 3 Planning
Property Owner:
Hardip Gill
100 Stagecoach Circle
West Covina, CA 91791
Applicant: Chary Dagarn
1000 Regal Canyon Dr.
Walnut, CA 91789
Environmental Determination: Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), Section 15303(a), the City has determined that this project is
categorically exempt.
Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development
4:1
Review No. 2000-15, Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval, as listed within the
resolution.
8. PUBLIC HEARING: None.
9. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS:
10. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
10.1 Maintenance Ordian —Specifically, roofing requirements
10.2 Planners Institute— Monterey, CA - March 21-23, 2001
10.3 Public Hearing dates for future projects.
11. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS:
PARKS & RECREATION Thursday, January 25, 2001 — 6:00 p.m.
COMMISSION: AQM1D Board Hearing Room
21865 E. Copley Drive
JOINT MEETING OF PARKS Thursday,'January 25, 2001 — 7:00 p.m.
AND RECREATION AND - AQMD Room CC -8
TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION 21865 E. Copley Drive
COMMISSION (Re: Trails Master Plan):
January 23, 2001 Page 4 Planning Commission
COMMUNITY OPEN HOUSE: Thursday, February 1, 2001
(Discussion of Trails Master Plan) 7:00 p.m. — 9:00 p.m.
AQMD CC -2
21865 E. Copley Drive
COMMUNITY OPEN HOUSE:
(Discussion of Trails Master Plan)
HOME COMPOST WORKSHOP:
Call (909) 396-5671 to reserve seat.
(February 3 workshop class full)
CITY COUNCIL MEETING:
TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION
COMMISSION MEETING:
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS
WASTE COLLECTION:
Thursday, February 3, 2001
10:00 a.m. — Noon
Heritage Park Community Center
2900 S. Brea Canyon Road
Saturday, February 3, 2001, and
Saturday, March 3, 2001
10:00 a.m. to Noon
Heritage Park, 2900 S. Brea Canyon Rd.
Tuesday, February 6, 2001 — 6:30 p.m.
AQMD Auditorium
21865 E. Copley Drive
Thursday, February 8, 2001 — 7:00 p.m.
AQMD Board Hearing Room
21865 E. Copley Drive
Saturday, February 10, 2001
9:00 a.m. — 3:00 p.m.
1300 Block Bridge Gate Drive
(Gateway Corporate Center)
Tuesday, February 13, 2001 — 6:00 p.m.
AQMD Auditorium
21865 E. Copley Drive
January 23, 2001 Page 5 Planning Commission
PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING:
COMMUNITY COORDINATING
COMMITTEE:
11. ADJOURNMENT:
Tuesday, February 13, 2001 — 7:00 p.m.
AQMD Auditorium
21865 E. Copley Drive
Monday, February 19, 2001
City offices will be closed and will re -open
on Tuesday, February 20, 2001 -
Monday, February 26, 2001— 7:00 p.m.
AQMD, Room CC -8
21865 E. Copley Drive
MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
JANUARY 9, 2001
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairman Nelson called the meeting to order at -7:06 p.m. in the South Coast Air Quality Management
Auditorium, 21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissioner Kuo.
1. ROLL CALL:
Present: Chairman Steve Nelson, Vice Chairman Bob Zirbes, and Commissioners
George Kuo, Steve Tye and Joe Ruzicka.
Also Present: Robert H. Pittman, Assistant City Attorney, David Meyer, Planning
Consultant, Ann J. Lungu, Association Planner, Linda Smith, Development Services
Assistant, Sonya Joe, Development Services Assistant, Stella Marquez, Administrative
Secretary, and Warren Siecke, Traffic Engineer.
2. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: None offered.
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
4. CONSENT CALENDAR:
4.1 Minutes of the December 12, 2000, Meeting.
C/Tye moved, C/Ruzicka seconded, to approve the minutes of December 12, 2000, as
presented. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Kuo, Tye, Ruzicka, VC/Zirbes
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAINED: COMMISSIONERS: Chair/Nelson
5. OLD BUSINESS:
5.1 Conditional Use Permit No. 99-4 Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 99-9 originally
approved on August 10, 1999, to allow for the operation of a restaurant with outdoor
dining, the sale and on-site consumption of alcoholic beverages and entertainment (i.e.,
dancing with a DJ, Karaoke, guitarist, folk singer, and comedy nights) at the location
referenced below. In accordance with Condition No. 50) of Resolution No. 99-19, a
periodic review of the Conditional Use Permit and Minor Conditional Use Permit is
JANUARY 9, 2001
PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSI®N
required to assure compliance with conditions of approval and to consider whether to
modify, add conditions as necessary, or revoke the permit. Municipal Code Section
22.76.020 authorizes the City to schedule a public hearing before the Planning Commission
to consider modification or revocation of a Conditional Use Permit. (Continued from
December 12, 2000)
:I' :_1 lA
Platinum Restaurant
245 Gentle Springs Lane -
(Parcel 1, Parcel Map No. 15547)
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
SX Diamond Bar
259 Gentle Springs Lane
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
Chris Pierce
245 Gentle Springs Lane
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
PC/Meyer presented staff's report. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt
the attached draft resolution as presented or as such resolution may be modified to clearly
elaborate the Commission's determination.
Chair/Nelson disclosed that he was contacted by Mr. Munoz on Sunday evening to see if
there were any questions regarding the applicant's proposed resolution. He stated that he
indicated to Mr. Munoz that he had no questions at that time and wanted an opportunity to
read the material.
VC/Zirbes moved to approve the applicant's draft resolution with the following changes:
1) add a. sentence to the end of Condition 1 to read as follows: "The owners of the Platinum
must notify the Planning Director within 72 hours of such a court action, and the Planning
Director shall schedule a review of the Conditional Use Permit before the Planning
Commission at the earliest opportunity." 2) Add a condition to read as follows: "The
business -owners shall employ security personnel on its operating nights in a number
satisfactory to control the patrons, both inside and outside of the facility. The security
personnel shall keep patrons at the Platinum Restaurant within the boundaries of the
Platinum Restaurant to prevent them from loitering and littering on adjoining or
neighboring properties."
ACA/Pittman recommended the following changes to the applicant's language contained
in the draft resolution: Section 5, last line, replace customers with patrons of the Platinum;
JANUARY 9, 2001 PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION
6.
im
Section 6, second line, change the date of the letter from December 12, 2000, to January 9,
2001.
VC/Zirbes accepted the changes to his motion recommended by ACA/Pittman. C/Ruzicka
seconded the motion with the provision that the City is fully protected under the applicant's
proposed resolution and VC/Zirbes' recommended changes.
ACA/Pittman stated that with respect to the position of the City, the City would be
protected. The ultimate goal is to mitigate perceived problems with the operation of the
Platinum Restaurant and protect the public health, safety and welfare. The Planning
Commission would achieve that objective regardless of which version of the draft
resolution the Commission adopts.
C/Kuo asked if the maximum number of restaurant patrons has been established.
ACA/Pittman explained that he and staff members are meeting with the Fire Department
this week to finally resolve that issue and that final occupancy will be in place by early next
week.
Chair/Nelson called for the vote. Motion carried 4-1 by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Kuo, Ruzicka, VC/Zirbes, Chair/Nelson
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Tye
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None
NEW BUSINESS: None.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING:
7.1 Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-02 and Development Review No. 2000-20 (pursuant
to Code Sections 22.58.020, 22.42.130 G and 22.48.020) are requests to co -locate a
telecommunications facility on an existing monopole approved on January 25, 1993, by
Conditional Use Permit No. 92-11. The request also includes an equipment cabinet, utility
pedestal and concrete pad for both. (Continued from November 28, 2000)
PC/Meyer reported that staff's recommendation is to continue this matter to'the January 23,
2001, Planning Commission meeting, pursuant to applicant's request, to allow time to
prepare plans and additional information requested by the Planning Commission.
Chair/Nelson re -opened the public hearing.
JANUARY 9, 2001
PAGE 4 PLANNING COMMISSION
Craig Clute, 21217 Fountain Springs Road, agreed to speak during the January 23, 2001,
public hearing. In the meantime, he will contact staff members with hisquestionsand
concerns.
C/Ruzicka moved, C/Tye seconded, to continue the public hearing for Conditional Use
Permit No. 2000-02 and Development Review No. 2000-20, to January 23, 2001. Motion
carried by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COMNIISSIONERS: Kuo, Ruzicka, Tye, VC/Zirbes, Chair/Nelson
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None
7.2 Conditional Use Permit No. 1998-09(1), Development Review No. 1998-11(1), and
Minor Variance No. 2000-19 (Pursuant to Code Sections 22.58.010, 22.48.020(A)(2), and
22.52.020(D)) is a request to amend Conditional Use Permit No. 1998-09, Development
Review No. 1998-11, and to approve a Minor Variance for a decrease of 20% in the
number of required off-street parking spaces to accommodate on-site seating for twelve at
Togo's. (Continued from November 14, 2000)
PROJECT ADDRESS: 1193 Diamond Bar Boulevard
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
PROPERTY OWNER: J. Coleman Travis Trust
C/O: Glacier Peak Management Services, Inc.
7955 Dunbrook Road, Suite A
San Diego, CA 92126
APPLICANT: Parker Holt -Doyle, LLC
1193 S. Diamond Bar Boulevard
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
DSA/Smith presented staff's report. Pursuant to Development Code
Section 22.68.0301)(c)(2), the Minor Variance is not required with the Conditional Use
Permit. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approves the amendment to
Conditional Use Permit No. 1998-09(1), Development Review No. 1998-11(1), Findings
of Fact, and conditions of approval as listed within the draft resolution.
Jack Greenspan, Linscott, Law & Greenspan Engineers, speaking on behalf of the
applicant, stated he concurs with staff's recommendations.
JANUARY 9,2001 PAGE 5 PLANNING COMMISSION
Lida Holt, applicant, said she concurs with staff's findings. The property manager is
receiving bids for the re -striping of the parking lot.
Chair/Nelson re -opened the public hearing.
Michael Drucker, owner of property adjacent to Togo's, said he requested copies of the
traffic engineer's reports for review. He asked if the most recent report consists of
extrapolations, or was the actual site observed. He asked for an explanation of the
percentage of the variance and how staff justifies an increase from 36 to 52 parking spaces.
He said he has evidence that currently there is not ample parking to support what exists at
the site. He indicated that Togo's property manager called him to ask if he was interested
in helping them re -asphalt the entrance to the center. He told her that he has owned the
center since 1988 and no one has ever asked him to contribute to the paving of that
particular area. Because the Commission stated during its last meeting that the area was
not to be re -striped until it was approved, he asked her to verify this fact with the Planning
Commission. Further, he said that the property indicated to him during the
I y manager
discussion that the center was under -parked at 42 spaces. He asked that he be given an
opportunity to review the modification to the mixed usage.
Mr. Greenspan stated that the current study was based on actual observations of the site
conducted on a Friday in October 2000, which were set forth in a report dated November 2,
2000. The December 19 report updated the conclusions and presented a refined analysis
of how many parking spaces would result due to re -striping of the on-site area.
PC/Meyer stated that with respect to the percentage of reduction, the applicant is requesting
that the number of spaces be reduced from the required 52 spaces to 40 spaces. Staff's
recommendation to the Planning Commission supported by two traffic engineers is that
there should be 36 functional parking spaces rather than 40 non-functional or marginally
utilized parking spaces.
Ken Patel, Subway owner, said he does not believe that a reduction in parking spaces to 36
is practical. At the request of Chair/Nelson, he showed a personal video tape he took last
Friday, which shows that almost every parking space is occupied.
Roxanne Taylor, Diamond Bar Town Center Property Manager, said she does not
understand how an October study of the site could have been accurate since Togo's had just
opened. Codes are in place for a reason. Adequate parking spaces should be provided.
Increasing the size of parking spaces and reducing the number required spaces does not
make sense to her. Placing such. an additional burden on the center really does not make
any sense to her. She visited the center between 6:00 p.m. and 6:30 p.m. tonight and was
unable to locate a parking space.
JANUARY 9,2001 PAGE 6 PLANNING COMMISSION
Chair/Nelson closed the public hearing.- -
C/Tye asked if the west side of the curb area between Togo's and Firestone that is not
painted red could be striped to create four or five additional parking spaces.
PC/Meyer responded that staff will look into the possibility of C/Tye's suggestion.
Following Commission deliberation, C/Tye moved, VC/Zirbes seconded, to approve
Conditional Use Permit No. 1998-09(1), and Development Review No. 1998-11(1),
Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval as listed within the draft resolution with the
following amendment: That on Page 9, Condition (n) indicate "3 tables for a total seating
for 6 seats." Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Kuo, Ruzicka, Tye, VC/Zirbes, Chair/Nelson
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None
PC/Meyer reiterated that staff will modify the resolution to eliminate any reference to
modification of the existing parking facilities and include the reference to a maximum
seating capacity of six seats, 3 tables. The resolution includes a provision for periodic
review of the operation by the Planning Commission.
PC/Meyer responded to VC/Zirbes that the resolution will clearly define the fact that the
Planning Commission has no comfort with the property owner re -striping the parking lot
which will be signed by the applicant as well as, the property owner.
8. PUBLIC HEARING:
Due to a potential conflict of interest, C/Ruzicka recused himself from deliberation on Public
Hearing Item 8.1 and left the dais.
8.1 Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-08 and Minor Conditional Use Permit 2000-22
(Pursuant to Code Sections 22.58, 22.56 and 22.68.030D) is a request to modify an existing
retail suite to a shared space for Kendo Martial Arts Studio and an Interior Design Studio,
and to approve a Minor Conditional Use Permit for a decrease in the number of required
off-street parking spaces for the legal non -conforming shopping center.
PROJECT ADDRESS: 1403 S. Diamond Bar Boulevard
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
JANUARY 9, 2001 PAGE 7 PLANNING COMMISSION
PROPERTY OWNER:
JHC Investment, LLC
3530 Wilshire Boulevard, #1440
Los Angeles, CA 90010
APPLICANT: Kevin Kim.
1410 S. Stonecrest Drive
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
DSA/Smith presented staff's report. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
approves Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-08 and Minor Conditional Use Permit
No. 2000 22, Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval as listed within the draft
resolution.
Chair/Nelson opened the public hearing.
There being no one present who wished to speak on this item, Chair/Nelson closed the
public hearing.
VC/Zirbes moved, C/Tye seconded, to approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-08 and
Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-22, Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval
as listed within the draft resolution. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Kuo, Tye, VC/Zirbes, Chair/Nelson
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Ruzicka
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None
C/Ruzicka returned to the dais.
8.2 Development Review No 2000-21 and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-21
(Pursuant to Code Section 22.48.020 and 22.68.030(B)) is a request to construct an addition
of approximately 13,572 square feet to an existing two-story Public Utility Telephone
Switching Facility of approximately 12,193 square feet for a total structure of
approximately 25,765 square feet. The Minor Conditional Use Permit is required for
expansion to a legal non -conforming structure.
PROJECT ADDRESS: 1041 South Grand Avenue
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
M
JANUARY 9, 2001
PROPERTY OWNER:
ENJIUMNOW
ruglam 1 ,M
Verizon
One Verizon Way
Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
TDM Architects, Inc.
930 Colorado Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90041
DSA/Smith presented staff's report. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
approve Development Review No. 2000-21 and Minor Conditional Use Permit
No. 2000-21, Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval, as listed within the resolution.
Chair/Nelson opened the public hearing.
Sheryl Brenneman lives across the street (Porte Grande) from the structure. She is
concerned about facility noise and view impact.
Diran Depanian, TDM Architects explained the placement of equipment and its screening.
Chair/Nelson closed the public hearing.
VC/Zirbes moved, C/Ruzicka seconded, to approve Development Review No. 2000-21,
Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-21, Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval as listed
within the draft resolution subject to the following amendments: 1) "Direct staff to work
with the applicant to see that dense landscaping with mature trees is placed on the street
frontage to minimize the visual impacts of the building and to maximize the natural beauty
of trees and foliage." 2) Amend Condition 0), page 12 to read "The entire project" instead
of "The proposed project." 3) If, in the future, any change occurs in the use of the land, the
City shall be duly noticed." Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES:
COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
9. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS:
10. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
Kuo, Ruzicka, Tye, VC/Zirbes, Chair/Nelson
None
None
None Offered.
10.1 Public Bearing dates for future projects - as noted.
JANUARY 9, 2001 PAGE 9 PLANNING COMMISSION
11. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS:
As listed in the Agenda.
ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business to come before the Planning Commission, Chairman Nelson adjourned
the meeting at 9:15 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
James DeStefano
Deputy City Manager
Attest:
Chairman Steve Nelson
City of Diamond Bar
PLANNING COMMISSION
Staff Report
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 7.1
REPORT DATE: January 17, 2001
MEETING DATE: January 23, 2001
CASEXILE NUMBER: Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 2000-02, and
Development Review No. 2000-20
APPLICATION REQUEST: To install a three panel antenna on an existing 60-
foot high monopole and to construct a 12 foot by
12 foot concrete slab upon which to mount a five-
foot high nine square foot equipment cabinet and
associated utility meter.
PROJECT LOCATION: 21400 Pathfinder Road
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
(Diamond Bar High School)
PROPERTY OWNER: Walnut Valley Unified School District
880 South Lemon Ave.
Walnut,. CA 91789
APPLICANT: Metricom, Inc.
1460 East 33rd Street
Signal Hill, CA 90807
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS :
On November 28, 2000, the Planning Commission held a public hearing for this proposed project. The
Planning Commission expressed a concern that the proposed antenna structure was not adequately
screened. The Planning Commission continued the public hearing to January 9, 2001, to allow the
applicant sufficient time to explore options that would result in compliance with the City's design criteria.
The applicant requested that the public hearing be continued to January 23, 2001, to afford an opportunity
to complete their investigation of alternatives.
As of this date, the applicant has submitted plans to add green fabric to the chain link fence along the west
side of the project area. This material will match the existing fencing along the southerly boundary of the
project. In addition seven (7) five -gallon bushes will be planted along the southerly boundary of the site
to soften the mass of the fence.
The existing trees located on the hillside terrain to the south and west provide screening of the existing
monopole to the surrounding neighborhood. The monopole, the attached antenna and the equipment
storage buildings are clearly visible to the participants using the high school athletic field and to observers
who may be seated in the bleachers adjacent to the athletic field. The location of the equipment structures
for the telecommunication facility limits the ability of the applicant to install additional trees to screen the
monopole and the proposed antenna structure from the easterly view corridor.
The Planning Commission has suggested the use of lightweight material to screen the antenna apparatus
from view. The applicant, Metricom Inc., is exploring their ability to manufacture and install such
screening material on the existing monopole. Metricom has advised staff that they must seek approval
from the owner of the monopole and that they must provide assurances that the pole has the structural
capability to withstand the additional forces that would be generated by the screening material. As of this
date, the applicant has not completed an engineering analysis of the existing monopole.
The Planning Commission may wish to reopen the public hearing and solicit testimony from the applicant
and other interested individuals. The Commission could debate the issues and then provide the applicant
with a range of alternatives that may properly address its concerns. As an alternative the Commission
could continue the application to a date certain and direct the applicant to provide the staff with the needed
information in a timely manner. As another alternative, the Planning Commission could close the public
hearing, express its intent to either approve or deny the project and direct staff to prepare a resolution to
be considered at the next regular meeting.
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission reopen the public hearing, receive testimony, and then
select from the following options:
1. Close the public hearing and direct staff to prepare a resolution of approval or denial to be
presented to the Commission at its next regular meeting for adoption; or
2. Continue the public hearing to a date certain and direct the applicant to provide the staff with
appropriate information.
Prepared by: LDM Associates
Planning Consultant
Attachments:
1. Photograph copies of site
2. Site Plan
3. Staff Report presented at Planning Commission Meeting on November 28, 2000
gA\StafiReponPC�cup00.2 dr00-20HighSchool-Puhfinder-jno01 2
\� :
.
---��3t
[�\
§\�
race i o 1 1
file://A:\1\4VC-00 1 S.JPG 12/7/00
Page i of i
file://A:\MVC-002S.JPG 12/7/00
1Jagc 1 Ul 1
file://A:11\4VC-003S.JPG 12/7/00
file://A:\MVC-004S.JPG 12/7/00
t'aue I v1 1
file://A:\1\4VC-005S.JPG - 12/7/00
Ilaue
file:HA:\1\4VC-006S.JPG 12/7/00
Page i of i
file://A:\1\4VC-007S.JPG 12/7/00
Yagc 1 ui i
file://A:\MVC-008S.JPG 12/7/00
flauc I o i
file://A:\A4VC-009S.JPG 12/7/00
file://A:\MVC-001 S.JPG 12/7/00
!'a, -,c i oi i
file:HA:\1\4VC-003S.JPG 12/7/00
i 01
file://A:\MVC-004S.JPG 12/7/00
file://A:WVC-005S.JPG =
1 1i7inn
Pa' -'e 1 01 1
file://A:\MVC-006S.JPG 12/7/00
file://A:\MVC-007S.JPG 12/7/00
t' iLi Ol i
file://A:\MVC-008S.JPG 12/7/00
1, au, c 1 () I I
file:HA:1MVC-009S.JPG 12/7/00
City of Diamond Bar
PLANNING COMMISSION
Staff Report
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 8.1
REPORT DATE: November 20, 2000
MEETING DATE: November 28, 2000
CASEffi LE NUMBER: Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-02, and
Development Review No. 2000-20
APPLICATION REQUEST:
The applicant is requesting approval of plans to
connect a three panel antenna to an existing 60 foot
high monopole and to construct a 12 foot by 12 foot
- concrete slab upon which to mount a five-foot high
nine square. foot equipment cabinet and associated
utility meter.
PROJECT LOCATION:
21400. Pathfinder Road
Diamond Bar, CA 91765.
(Diamond Bar High School) _
PROJECT .OWNER:
Walnut Valley Unified School District
880 South Lemon Avenue
Walnut, CA 91789,..
APPLICANT:
Metricom, Inc.
1460 East 33'd Street.
Signal Hill, CA 90807
BACKGROUND: -.
The subject property is a fully developed public high school (Diamond Bar High School). It is owned and
operated by the Walnut Valley Unified School District. The site is zoned R-1,7,500. The southwest
corner of the athletic field has -been the subject of - previous requests for the construction
telecommunications antennas and associated unmanned equipment facilities. The City has previously
approved the construction of two monopoles at this location (see CUP 92-11 and CUP 94-7). The
telecommunication facilities have been utilized since. 1993.The existing ground mounted equipment.
storage buildings are located within a fully enclosed and screened area. .
FASnflRePW-rc�e�OD Ox8�9o-2oNiahs�oo4�
The land uses surrounding the subject high school site include single-family residential to the north, south
and east, with commercial development located along the SR 57 Freeway to the west. The proposed
project is located adjacent to the football stadium and is less than 100 feet from the closest single-family
residential dwelling. The site is elevated approximately 50 feet above the dwelling unit to the south.
The previous Planning Commission approval of the 60 foot high monopole included a condition that the
pole be designed and constructed with the capability of use by dual service providers (see Planning
Commission Resolution No. 95-17) This request is for the City's approval to connect to the existing
monopole in accordance with the intent of previous City approvals.
On March 2, 1999, the City adopted an ordinance establishing development standards for radio and
television antennas and wireless telecommunication antenna facilities (Ordinance No. 04 [1999]). The
proposed project was reviewed as to its compliance with the City's adopted development standards as set
forth in Section 22.42.130 of the City's Development Code.
The proposed antenna will be located approximately 10 feet beneath the existing antenna equipment
mounted at the top of the existing 60 -foot high monopole. The new antenna equipment will be painted to
match the existing equipment. The proposed unmanned equipment will be located within the existing =
fenced and screened area that located near the existing monopole. The electrical service to the new
equipment will be installed underground. The equipment cabinet is approximately 3 foot by 3 foot six
inches. The height of the cabinet is 5 feet 2 inches. The surrounding fencing is six feet high. The
equipment will be completely screened by the existing fencing and landscape material. The existing
eucalyptus tree located on the slope to the south of the existing facility screens the project from view from
the residential community,,,, The site is elevated above the mad surface of Brea Canyon Road. The existing
slope landscaping softens the appearance of the existing facility.
The proposed project -is subject to the development standards set forth in Section 22.42.130(7) of the
Diamond Bar Development Code. This section of the code deals with the "Modification to Existing
Facilities". The existing telecommunication facilities were legally constructed prior to the effective date
of the new ordinance requirements. The proposed modifications will not increase the height of the existing
facilities. Potential adverse visual impacts have been or will be mitigated to the maximum extent possible.
No required parking spaces will be eliminated as a result of the proposed modifications.
The applicant has provided additional information concerning the proposed project. The information has
been attached to this report for your review and consideration.
IK 1) z 1810111
The proposed modification to the existing telecommunication facilities located on the subject property are
consistent with previously adopted policies of the City, as set forth in the General Plan, to guide the orderly
development of the community, to promote the public health, safety, comfort, convenience, and general
welfare of the City's residents, to protect property "values, and to enhance the aesthetic appearance of the
City by maintaining architectural and structural integrity and by protecting views* from .obtrusive and
unsightly accessory uses and facilities.
2 -..
ti
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT:
Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section 15301(b),
Class 1, the City has determined that this project is Categorically Exempt.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:
On November 16, 2000, approximately 296 property owners within a 700 -foot radius of the subject
property were sent notices of the public hearing on November 17, 2000. On November 17, 2000, this
application was advertised in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin.
RECOM ENDATION: .
The staff recommends that the Planning Commission open the public hearing, receive testimony, close the
public hearing, and approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-02, and Development Review No. 2000-20,
Findings of Fact, and conditions of, approval, as listed within the resolution.
FINDINGS OF FACT:
1. The proposed project, to the extent feasible, blends into the surrounding environment.
2. The proposed project, to the extent feasible, is screened or camouflaged by existing topography and
vegetation.
3. The proposed project is consistent with the surrounding development in terms of mass and scale.
4. The proposed project is sufficiently setback from the surrounding residential structures.
5. Access to the proposed project is taken from existing facilities located on the High School site and
no new access roads.will be required.
6. The proposedproject conforms to the City's most preferred location in -that it is to be co -located
with an existing facility at a pre -approved location.
3
Founded in 1985, Metricom provides wireless data communications and network solutions for personal
computer and industrial applications. The firm, headquartered in Los Gatos, California, develops license -
free, high performance products that feature advanced, spread -spectrum packet radio technology, which
sends data across a network of intelligent radio nodes.
Metricom's Ricochet division provides wireless access and communications solutions for groups and
individuals using computers in the corporate, consumer and education market sectors. Ricochet offers
affordable monthly subscriptions to its wireless service at flat rates which includes internet and e-mail
accounts with unlimited usage. Subscribers can also access corporate LANs and intranets, on-line services
such as American Online and CompuServe with additional options.
TWWT �
The intent of Metricom is to provide high speed mobile internet access services for personal and business
purposes to the City of Diamond Bar and surrounding communities.
I, ,
The applicant proposes to install a' Wired Access Point (WAP) facility on an existing monopole, owned
by SpectraSite Communications, Inc., previously owned by Smart SMR of California, Inc. The site is
situated on a portion of the property located in the City of Diamond Bar, identified as '21400 Pathfinder
within the Diamond Bar High School campus and is identified on the City Telecommunications Facilities
Opportunities Map.
The facility would be utilized to locate the following: ..
® Three (3) antenna sectors. Each sector will have four (4) panel antennas and will be mounted 10'
below the top of the existing 60' monopole. Each panel antenna will have the dimensions of 36" high
x 10.5" wide x 2.5".deep. By using an existing monopole.to.mount the panel antennas, the need to
construct a new monopole is avoided. Furthermore, eucalyptus trees partially screen the existing
monopole.
® One (1) - Equipment cabinet (29" wide x 32" deep x 72" high) will be ground mounted within an
existing 6' high fence enclosure adjacent to an existing shelter on the west side of the monopole. .
Metricom has received permission from the property owner to allow construction and maintenance of
the facility, as well as access to the site.
GENERAL SITE ANALYSIS
Unlike other land uses which can be spatially determined through the General Plan or other land use plans,
the location of wireless telecommunication and data facilities are based on technical requirements which
include service area, geographical elevations, alignment with neighboring sites and customer demand
components. " Placement within the urban geography is dependent on these requirements. Accordingly,
wireless telecommunication and data facilities have been located adjacent to and within all major land use
categories including residential, commercial, industrial, open space, etc. proving to be compatible in all
locations.
The proposed facility is unmanned, and will have no impact on circulation systems, and generate no noise,
odor, -smoke, or any other adverse impacts to adjacent land uses. The proposed facility will allow
commuters and residents within the coverage area wireless access to the rapidly expanding communication
infrastructure by providing data transmission services.
The installation of the proposed facility will not result in changes to the character of the community. The
proposed wireless telecommunications facility will be in full compliance with all state and federal
regulations including the Telecommunications Act of 1996.
Ezdsting Use
The subject area is located along Brea Canyon Road in the City of Diamond Bar within the Diamond Bar
High School campus, adjacent to the school's football field and is zoned (R-1) Low Density Residential.
The site is presently being. used by NEXTEL for mobile telecommunications.
Surrounding Uses
Irregular topography and -improved streets characterize surrounding properties. Surrounding land uses
include: Diamond Bar High School to the north and east of the monopole and residential to the south with
the 57 freeway adjacent to the west.
Easement/Utilities
Metricom has obtained, from the property owner, the right to gain access to the site, as well as a lease for
construction and operation of a commercial wireless facility. _
Metricom's Diamond Bar WAP Facility has the following benefits:
• Brings leading-edge technology to the community, including businesses, households, schools, public
service agencies, and medical facilities.
• Inter -city wireless communications and information, including wireless "e-mail".
• Can provide non -emergency communications for dispatch vehicles, such as police, fire, building
inspectors, appraisers, parks and recreation, etc.
• The project will have no environmental impacts.
"
NA T
The intent of Metricom:is to provide high speed mobile internet access services for personal and business
purposes to the City of Diamond Bar and surrounding communities. The applicant proposes to install a
Wined Access Point (WAP) facility on an existing monopole, owned by SpectraSite Communications, Inc.,
previously owned by Smart SMR of California, Inc. The site is situated on a portion of the property
located in the City of Diamond Bar, identified as 21400 Pathfinder within the Diamond Bar High School
campus and is identified on the City Telecommunications Facilities Opportunities Map.
Section'22.42.130 (G) of the Diamond Bar Development Code may allow a wireless telecommunications
facility to be authorized by an Administrative Review as long as it complies with requirements set forth
in Section 22.42.130(G)(2) subparagraphs "a" through "g". Even though Metricom's proposed WAP
facility is co -locating on an existing approved monopole, it seems that it does not meet the criteria of an
Administrative Review due to the issue regarding antenna concealment. The existing monopole does not
provide the opportunity to conceal the proposed antennas.
Based on technical requirements, Metricom's target area for their WAP facility, is within a predominately
residential area with a minimal amount of existing tall structures to accommodate their equipment.
Metricom has made considerable effort in choosing a site that conforms to G6(f)(l)and(2), of the Diamond
Bar Development Code, Section 22.42:130, and to meet their own technical needs. 'By using this existing
monopole to co -locate their antennas, the need to construct a new monopole is avoided. .
.PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -XX
OV
III i 1 1 Y/ 1 1 III 1 1
A. RECITALS.
1. The property owner,* Walnut Valley Unified School District, and applicant Mr. Keyur
Mistry, acting as the agent for Metricom, Inc., have filed an application fora Conditional
Use Permit No. 2000-02 and Development Review No. 2000-20 for a property located at
21400 Pathfinder Road, Diamond Bar, Los Angeles County, California. Hereinafter in this
Resolution, the subject Development Review, Conditional- Use Permit, and Categorical
Exemption shall be referred to as the "Application."
2. On November 16, 2000, public hearing notices were mailed to approximately 296 property
-owners within a 700 -foot radius of the project site. On November 17, 2000, notification
of the public hearing for this project was provided in the San_ alley Tribune and
Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers, and the project site was posted with a display
board Further, the public notice was posted at three public places.
3. On November 28, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted
a duly noticed public hearing on the Application.
B. RESOLUTION.
NOW, REFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City
of Diamond Bar as follows:
1. This Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the
Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The Planning Commission hereby finds that the Environmental Categorical Exemption has
been prepared by the City of Diamond Bar in compliance with the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality.Act (CEQA) of 1970 and guidelines promulgated
thereunder, pursuant to Section 15301(b). Furthermore, the Categorical Exemption reflects
the independent judgement of the City of Diamond Bar.
S-WAm lut om FCCLT0 oZc$c Ds Highschool 0V0o.d= . .
3. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds and determines that, having considered
the record as a whole including the findings set forth below, and changes and alterations
which have been incorporated into and conditioned upon the proposed project set forth in
the application, there is no evidence before this Planning Commission that the project
proposed herein will have the potential of an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the
habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Rased upon substantial evidence, this Planning
Commission . hereby__ -_rebuts the presumption of adverse - effects contained in
Section 753.5 (d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
4. Rased on the findings and conclusions set forth herein, this Planning Commission hereby
finds as follows:
(a) The project site is a fully developed public high school and the proposed project is
the co -location of a telecommunication antenna to be attached to an existing
monopole. --
(b) The project site has a General Plan land use designation of Low Density Residential.
(c) . The project site zoned R 7,500. -
(d) Generally, the site is surrounded to the north, south, and east with R-1-7,500 zoned
property. The property to the west is zoned CPD (Commercial Planned
Development).
Development Review
(e) The,design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with the applicable
elements of the City's.General Plan, City Design Guidelines, and development
standards of the applicable district, design guidelines, and architectural criteria for .
special areas (e.g., theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards or
planned developments).
The project site is an existing fully developed public high school with similar type
telecommunication facilities located within close proximity of the proposed project.
On July 25,1995, the City adopted its General Plan. The proposed project complies
with the General Plan land use goals, objectives and strategies....
(f) The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the use
and enjoyment of neighboring existing or fliture development and will not create
traffic or pedestrian hazards.
The project site is an existing public high school. The site contains similar
telecommunication facilities. The proposed project includes the attachment of an
antenna to an existing 60 -foot high monopole. The associated nine square foot
equipment cabinet will be located in an existing fenced and screened area.
0
(g) The proposed project, to the extent feasible, is screened or camouflaged by existing
topography and vegetation.
(h) The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for
its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use
of materials, texture, and color that will remain aesthetically appealing and will
--retain a reasonably adequate level of maintenance.
The proposed project is consistent with the surrounding development in terms of
mass and scale. The proposed project is sufficiently setback from the surrounding
residential structures.' Access to the proposed project is taken from existing
facilities located on the high school site and no new access roads will be required.
(i) The proposed development will not be detrimental to public health, safety or
welfare or materially injurious (e.g., negative affect on property values or resale(s)
of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity; and
Before the issuance of any City permits, the proposed project is required to comply
with all conditions within the approved resolution and the Building and Safety
Division, Public Works Division, and -.Fire Department -requirements. The
referenced agencies through the permit and inspection process will ensure that the
proposed project is not detrimental to the public -health, safety or welfare or
materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity.
(j) The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental. Quality Act (CEQA),
Section 15301(b), the City has determined that the proposed project is categorically
exempt from -the provisions of CEQA.
Conditional Use Permit
(k) -The proposed use is allowed within the subject zoning district with the approval of
a Conditional Use Permit and complies with all other applicable provisions of the
Development Code and the Municipal Code;
The proposed telecommunication project is permitted on the subject property as set
forth in Section 22.42.130 of the Diamond Bard Development Code.
(1) The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific
plan;
The proposed project is consistent with the goals, objectives and strategies as set
forth in the City's adopted General Plan.
K]
(m) Design, location, size and operating characteristics of the proposed use are
compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity; .
The proposed co -location of the telecommunications equipment with existing
facilities is -consistent with the City's development policies.
(n) The subject site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of use Ding
proposed including provision of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land
includin g
uses, and the absence of physical constraints; and
The project site is -a 'My developed public high school with similar
telecommunication facilities in place and operational for approximately eight years.
The minor addition to the existing facilities will have no additional impact on the
community.
(o) Granting the Conditional Use Permit will not be detrimental to the public interest,
health, safety, injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity and
zoning district in which the property is located;
Before the issuance of any City permits, the proposed project is required to: comply
with all conditions set forth in the approving resolution; and the Building and
Safety Division; Public Works Division; and Fire Department requirements. The
referenced agencies through the permit and inspection process will ensure that the
proposed project is not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or
materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity.
5. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth above, the Planning Commission hereby
approves the -Application subject to the following conditions:..
(a) The project shall substantially conform .to the submitted plans presented to the
Planning Commission, and as such plans may be amended herein.
(b) The site shall be maintained in a condition, which is free of debris both during and
after the construction, addition, or implementation of the entitlement granted herein.
The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether during or subsequent to
construction shall be done only by the property owner, the applicant or by a duly
permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide
collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste from residential, commercial,
constriction, and industrial areas within the City... It shall be. the applicant's
obligation to insure that the waste contractor utilized has obtained permits from the
City of Diamond Bar to provide such services:
(c) All conditions of Planning Commission Resolution No. 95-17 as such conditions
apply to the landscaping and maintenance of this site shall be complied. with.
H
(d) All utility service to the proposed project shall be installed underground and such
installation shall be completed prior to the Spring of 2001 to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer.
(e) Underground trench replacement shall conform to the Public Works Division
Standards. Traffic control shall be installed in a manner acceptable to the City
Engineer. --
(f) Construction shall be limited to 8:30 am to 4:00 p.m. Monday through Thursday
and 8:30 am to 3:00 p.m. Friday. No work shall be done Saturday or Sunday.
(g) Construction Plans shall conform to State and Local Building Codes (i.e., 1998
editions of the Uniform Building Code, Plumbing Code, Mechanical Code and
1998 edition of the National Electrical Code) as well as the State Energy Code.
(h) The proposed antenna attachments shall be engineered to meet wind loads of
80 m.p.h. with an exposure "C". The existing monopole shall be designed for the
additional antenna loads.
(i) All proposed cable installed on the exterior building wall shall be flashed, painted
or otherwise treated to match existing buildings and equipment.
(j) In the event that cable or electrical conduit is install from the BTS cabinet or any
vault, such installation shall be made underground in a manner acceptable to the
Building Official.
(k) This:,entitlement is valid for two -years and. must be exercised (i.e., construction
started) within that period or this entitlement shall automatically expire. A one-year
extension may be requested in writing and submitted to the City 30 days prior to the
expiration date.
(1) This grant shall not be effective for any purpose until -the permittee and owner of
the property involved (if other than the permittee) have filed, within fifteen
(15) days of approval of this grant, at the City of .Diamond Bar Community and
Development Services Department, their affidavit stating that they are aware of and
agree to accept all the conditions of this grant. Further, this grant shall not be
effective until the permittee pays applicable City processing fees, school fees and
fees for the review of submitted reports.
(m) All requirements of the Development Code and the underlying zone district shall
be complied with unless modified by this entitlement.
The Planning Commission shall:
(a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and
(b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, via certified mail, to: Walnut
Valley Unified School District, 880 South Lemon Avenue, Walnut, CA 91789, and
IARr. Keyur Mistry, c/o Metricom, Inc.,1460 East 33'd Street, Signal Hill, CA 90807.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 281h OF NOVEM BER 2000, BY THE PLANNING
COMMSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR.
BY:
Steve Nelson, Chairman...
I, James DeStefano, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was
duly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar, at a regular
meeting of the'Planning Commission held on the 28th day of November 2000, by the following vote:
NOES:
ABSENT: _
ABSTAIN:
CM OF DIAMOND BAR
DEPARUM OF
COMMDNM & DEVELOPS SERVICES
Planning Division
21660 E. t opky Drive Smte 190, Diced Bar, t,A 91765
(909)396.5676 Fax (909)861.3117
Name walnut -V -1 ev Unified
(Lou name fast)
_11WZ-u.■ -
Metricom
0AOanne fut)
1460 E. 33rd St.
chy Walnut. CA Signal Hill., CA
,zip 21789 90807
phmc( )9Qs_5g5_1261 pbme( ) 562-988-0039
FPL 0,
Deposit S
Receipt M
By
Date Reed :—
FOR MY USE
Applicant's Agent
Arthur, Peter(RCC)
(Last name lust)
3158 Redhill Ave #2(
Costa Mesa, CA
92626
ph=v( )714-754-5431
Fax () Fax () 562-988-7790 Fax ( )714-754-5721,
NOTE: It is dw appliowes respamnbility to notify 60 01Y in spiting of any cbnp of lhe principals involved during the
processing of this case.
(Attach separate abeet, if wry; iacladioog names. aftaimes, ted apshm of members dpffWudqxjwW venose:, and direeI I of
empwationL)
Consent: I cot& dwt I wx the otaeer of dke kessin "ardpennit * OPPEMW O file tkb request
Signed Please see ' attached lease Datie
(AD record ownw) .
Cerhpation. I, the mukritne4 hm!by coo wuW pnwby of *at the iqfmwdm hams p vvi&i h comer to the
best of myknmiedgs.
Print Name Pete .Arthur, (RCC Consultants, Inc.)
Signed Dam '
(APplicant ar Apo)
Laca6oe 21400 Pathfinder Road
(wed address wumaand lot samba)
ZonWg R-1 - ff 5� _ Home Nwbaing map l e �" H 33 3
DA Z' S
•Previous Cases CUP -T92 -11j DR 92-5, and CUP 9.6-12 (ru,p 9th- 7
Prot wUseofSiu Wireless telecommunications monopole adjacent to DBHS FB Fielt
Use applied for Same Use with expanded wireless telecommunications facility
Q2 -located on existing monopole for wireless high-speed mobile internet
7NDMONAL USE PERMIT BURDEN O' ROOF
**Please See Attached**
r In addition to the information required in the applicatim the apPb=ot sball substantiate to the satisfactioo of the Planning
Commission, the following facts: (answers must be full & wmpkft) .
A That the requested use at the location proposal wl not:
1. Adversely affect the health, peace, comfort or welfarc of persons residing or working to the surrounding
area, or
2. Be materially detzmeotal to the use, enjoyment or valuation of property of other persons located in the
vicinity of the site, as.
3. Jeopardize, codan or osr MIC cOnSdUft a =coace to the public be" safety or general welfare.
B. That the p%xwed. site is adequate in sire and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading
facriilies, IwAsomping and other development featnrsa presort'bed in this Title 22, or as is otherwise required in
order to integrate said use with the vacs in the 3011001ding VIOL
C. That the proposed site is adequately served:
1 • By highways or streets of sWZciwj width and impmved as necomy to Cony the idad and gmmtity of
tiaffic snchuse would scocrate, and
2. By other pvbiic or private service hcMtiu as are t+eguba _.
Residential: '
Total baits Bwbdw I Bedroom 2 BdM dt darner
Total Pk;. CVV Fkg. uwm. Pk&
Project Sae: Lot Coinage:
lion -residential:
Sq. 8 area
pleigbt: No. of Boom- Sq. Footage
No. ofBlslgs. Occ.npaniLoad+
• CUP Burden a ?wd- Page 1
Parkin. N/A
Handicap
Landscaping: N / A
Sq. feet
Gradmg: Y ® Nxx Ifm
cut
FM
Import: .Y ® 'Ai X Uym
Export: Y ® N- X If -
Oompant Load as calculated bydje.Betc SafietyDbuzon is mpiredfor all dining t orarsembh+use. churches,
health clubs, theaters, etc.
LEGAL DESC UMON (s11 IWB s)
Please see attached
2
BAR
OF • i t
Suite,
Fax0.
Record Owner
Name WWOOE AtLCY-'—
(Last name Sa 900d - Disr
Addmx j8D S . LEr%,w Ave
Cay '� At_ U 1
Phoae(go9 S 9 E -1.261
Applicant - • - . -. _ _ ......
Mr 1c--1 M._jMC • -e7,
C-
GA.-
GA.- G1 ogo-7
Pbone(562). 9 $$" - 0038
Case#
FPL #_� "
Deposit S
Receipt# ' p
BY
Data Rev'd
Applicant's Agent
M 1 TRY •kE `I V(Z
r1' (List nam fust)
1v 1 S bias; Si #10 1,
tUQQA+1r-
CA 11.5 oZ
PtoaoneFd 8) `� S 3' 3 O 4 ,c I U
NOTE: It is the applimes rCSponst'bt'h'ty to notify the aonmtrnity Development Dirxtor in writing of any change of the
principals involved during the processing of this case.
(Aaseh a separate shat, if neeasary, bwbmft amma, addmmu, and signmm of members of partnerships, joint veaowra, and directors
of corporations.)
Consent. 1 cert fy that 1 am the owner of the hetes dmraa propeny and pamit the apprwant tof le this request.
6 _
Signed S �4T?sic tem C ' Sc
Date
(All record owttets)
Cer<iftcalion: 1, the aundemi{gned, hereby an* wider penally q f pequuy dot the Wonramdion herein pmyMed Is correct
to the best of my knowdeds►a. _.
Print Name ;cg. PPC 74
( or AVn*
Signed Date 10- 03 loo -mo ;
(Appy or A
(vocation 2-14 Oo Pfl T H-F,r.10L4 r—o-r4ib _.
(Stmet address or traet and lot nmpba)
Zoning �^ iirTM
Previc" uses Culp ►� t% Q `12 — 5 CUP 9G,
Present Use of Site tlLCti.cSS �Mf'^�N�41?r �..JS P10"oP.�t.cc. ASA�T � is 1A RS
• 4;4Q 0_90%... 46th
Use •ItpIied for .s Vic..: VSC tom► 1 H �X'%� iar Q�Etf cs ct,�EcJ,rY`wNtcJ� totes
�74C t L4 -r "1 Sm - L__ -CA L__-CAM7 5Q O N CXIS i r e�1� /"''�n+�►%�OLi alt _
lit �C1.c$S Ni'"o31.�/k A n,jL'TuGyt�
An application for Development Review is nquind for any and all conmoorciaL huhsstrial, institutional development,
and any residential project which proposes five dwelling units or zoare (detached or which involves the
issuance of a building pennit for construction or McCustrUcum Of a s)which meets the foliowmS criteria:
1.
Now construction on vacant propew.
2. Smmngl 8&1=m to low buldwp %toch am eq W to fifty percent of the floor area of an existing on-site
s), or hevea minimm an 6onsand square fed as gross floor
3, • n to ft percent of the floor area of GXisft Ok-"8 WULDg(s), Or have
a in PIGS floor =q
4, pwjsm kNdhhg a aftaniial change or istansificedon of land use, such as, but nn -at limited to. the conversion
of an c&ft bdIft too mmuzow. or do convasion of residential stsucatre to -an office or commercial use.
5. Residential, commercial, industrial, or institutional projects proposed upon
a decending slope abutting -a public street.
ALL DEVELOPNlENT REVIEW • .S SHALL CONTAINTHE • • r.
NF •
elevationsA. A detailed site plan, floor plans and
pared1. Dimensions and orientation of do
3. Location of save ovwb=S and architechusl fesnum.
proposed.
S. ChudinS Pians, inch -1 easthwork calculations.
B. Development Review nupdres 15 full sized folded (11% $11) of each
C. All building eUvations including sigazSc
D. Indicate types and colors of all exterior construction matcrials with a materials board. Include a colored scadering of
she proposal (both maximum sae l8•xl4o).
E. Location of all walls and finces, tbeir beigia and materials of
F. Copses of any and all CCAR7s applicable to the development or use of the
G. Any other ambitecanal and casitnocnag data as may be n quirsd to,permit a complein investigation of rho
H. ' land use ndi.us map--.
I. 2 sets of gummed mailing labels for all property owners within the 300' .adius (including applicant andlor
applicant's ). Number all lots and cross reference with labels. Include a phatown of all labels.
). Photographs of site and trey diagram.
K. Dalt tree
'L. 2 copies of a Title Report that is less than 30 days old.
THE MATERIALS HEREWITH HELNG sbammPaD IAO NOT CONVIT31M A COMPLEM FILING OR AN
ACCEPTANCE 8YTHE CfIY. W&h 30 days ficin the due noted on the fee nce4K, dwappUcent or bis agent will be maged
a statement notifying him ifaddamond materials or 'stfinmadon are
r_, , ,......._. ., "I -
1 • " •. � � 1' • :`SIJ ^�:.a.... _ - •' 1'..�• • ,._:... � _,;.. .., .. ..� ...: -.�:.. ,. �.
' benVanedby /w P qf
TREE PRESERVATION STATEMENT
" subject property contains no oak, walnut, sycamore, willow, or naturalized
Califorr&Pepper trees.
t J The subjea Property contain one or more oak,walnut, sycamore, willow, or
naturalized California Pepper tree. The applicant anticipates that no activity
(grading and/or. construction) wilt take place within five (S) feet of the outer
dripUne of any oak, walnut, sycamore, wMow, or naturalized California Pepper
tree.
The subject property contaim one or more oak, walnut, sycamore, willow, or
naturalized California Pepper trees. The applicant notes that activity (grading
and/or construction) wit take place Widlin five (5) feet of the outer dripline
of any oak, walmrt, sycamore, willow, or naturalized California Pepper tree. A
Tree Permit- has been or wr'lt be applied for prior to any activity taking place on
the property.
— /o -- 03 — Z.-000
(Applicant's Signature; (Date)
0
::y n
a
or
:i8
9�Q
#3lrND ICU it V Zil 60-u%` aa1 Up, pIVBCo3M00I\C1 olfAAO PUDWIM : PIRM
ZC�rZt;o __. _._�.__.,.._..._.._ ..v__....�I3e► "�� :aao¢£S6sT8 xv.q C6 -!TT TO/LT/TO
O D
C C
gg�fig,Ll
m
na e`c
V
r-4
nIOU
; F
8
(ge d
a
or
:i8
9�Q
#3lrND ICU it V Zil 60-u%` aa1 Up, pIVBCo3M00I\C1 olfAAO PUDWIM : PIRM
ZC�rZt;o __. _._�.__.,.._..._.._ ..v__....�I3e► "�� :aao¢£S6sT8 xv.q C6 -!TT TO/LT/TO
City of Diamond Bar
PLANNING COMMISSION
Staff Report
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 7.2
REPORT DATE: December 27, 2000
MEETING DATE: January 23, 2001
CASE/FILE NUMBER: Development Review No. 2000-15
APPLICATION REQUEST: To construct a two-story single-family dwelling
unit containing approximately 9,471 square feet, a
basement and a 1,546 square foot three -car,
garage. In addition, the request includes an
accessory gazebo . structure containing
approximately 400 square feet.
PROJECT LOCATION: 1819 Derringer Lane
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
(Lot 2 of Tract No. 24046)
PROPERTY OWNER: Mr. Hardip Gill
100 Stagecoach Cir.
West Covina, CA 91791
APPLICANT: Mr. Chary Dagam
1000 Regal Canyon Dr.
Walnut, CA 91789
BACKGROUND:
The property owner, Hardip Gill and applicant, Chary Dagam are requesting approval of Development
Review No. 2000-15 (pursuant to Code Section 22.48.020) in order to construct a two-story single-
family dwelling unit containing approximately 9,471 square feet, a basement and a 1,546 square foot
three -car garage. In addition, the request includes an accessory gazebo structure containing
approximately 400 square feet.
The reference project was adgendized for the December 12, 2000 Planning Commission meeting. At
that time, the public hearing was opened and continued to January 23, 2001 to allow the applicant
additional time to prepared for the public hearing.
The subject property is addressed as 1819 Derringer Lane and it is located at the northwest corner of
Derringer Lane and Diamond Knoll within a gated community identified as "The Country Estates".
It is rectangular shaped vacant lot approximately 67, 954 square feet (1.56 net acres)_ sloping
downward from Diamond Knoll Lane to the north at a ratio of approximately 4:1. The property is
encumbered with a variety of easements for incidental purposes such as pole lines, utilities, and
recreational trails, etc toward the rear.
The General Plan land use designation for the subject site is Rural Residential (RR) and the zoning
designation is R-1-40,000 zone. Single-family dwelling use is permitted within this zone pursuant to
Section 22.08.030 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code. The land uses surrounding the subject
property to the north is a vacant residentially zoned parcel of land. The land uses to the east, south and
west is single-family residential.
ANALYSIS:
Development Review
In accordance with Section 22.48.020.A.1 and 3, an application for Development Review is required
because the application request involves more than 10,000 square feet of combined gross floor area.
Additionally, this review is required to establish the consistency of new development with the General
Plan by promoting quality aesthetic and ensuring that new development and intensification of existing
development yields a pleasant living environment and attracts the interest of residents as the result of
consistent exemplary design.
The applicant has submitted soils report No. 88-767 prepared in December 1989 by Triad Foundation
Engineering Inc. The soils report was revised September 6, 2000, by Soils and Geology Inc., in order
to update the original report for the current project. The Building and Safety Division may need
additional information because the report seems to reference another development plan that includes a
swimming pool and a crib wall. The submitted plans do not include a crib wall nor do they indicate
that a swimming pool will be part of the proposed project.
The applicant has submitted a grading plan prepared by H. Steve Nazemi of Tustin California dated
September 19, 2000. The submitted plans show a series of 5 -foot high retaining walls along the
southerly and easterly property lines that will result in terraces that permit the finish floor of the
dwelling to be constructed approximately 14 feet below the elevation of Diamond Knoll Lane. The
dwelling will then follow the sloping terrain to the north. The roof of the new dwelling will be
approximately 7 feet above the finished grade of Diamond Knoll Lane.
The proposed dwelling will be set back approximately 180 feet from the front property line. The
dwelling will be set back 10 feet from the southerly (side) property line and by 59 feet from the
northerly (side) property line. In addition, the gazebo structure is located 40 feet from the southerly
(side) property line and 45 feet from the westerly (rear) property line. The minimum setback
2
requirements per Section 22.08.040 have been complied with. The site has access from Derringer
Lane. A driveway located along the southerly portion of the property provides access to the 3 -car
garage through the porte-cochere. The rear portion of the property will be improved with terraced
garden and a gazebo.
The total lot coverage of the building footprint is 5,092 square feet. The total lot coverage for areas
dedicated to vehicle access (driveways) is 9,485- square feet. The total lot coverage for accessory uses
such as the walkways, decks and other miscellaneous impervious areas is approximately 1,000 square
feet. The total lot coverage (impervious area) for the subject property is 15,577 square feet. (i.e. 23%).
The maximum allowable lot coverage is 30% or (20,386 sq. ft.).
The proposed residence is in the Spanish Mediterranean architectural style. The exterior design
elements include items such as a porte-cochere, pre -cast columns, clay tile roof, pre -cast trim, and
balconies with pre -cast balusters included in the guardrails. The building sections show that the
maximum height of the proposed dwelling is 35 feet as measured from the natural grade. The
proposed height of the dwelling complies with the provisions of Section 22.08.040 (Residential Zoning
District General Development Standards) of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code.
TABLE 1: RR — Rural Residential District Development Standards
Development Feature
RR Zoning District
Requirements
Proposed
Meet
Requirements
Minimum Lot Area:
1 Acre - (43,560 S.F.)
67,954 S.F.
Yes
Residential Density:.,.--
1 Single Family Unit
1 Single Family Unit
Yes
Setbacks ReqRiIed:
Front:
30 Ft.
180 Ft.
Yes
Sides (each):
Street Side:
15 Ft. & 10 Ft.
15 Ft. reversed comer lot;
10 Ft. otherwise.
10 Ft. & 59 Ft.
10 Ft.
Yes
Yes
*Rear:
25 Ft.
145 Ft.
Yes
Height Limit:
35 Ft.
35 Ft
Yes
Hillside Development;
As required by Chapter
22.22 (Hillside Management).
Per Code
Yes
Landscaping:
As required by Chapter
22.24 (Landscaping). —
Per Code
Yes
Parking:
2 in fully enclosed garage.
3 in fully enclosed
Yes
Parking for Second
Unit
N/A
N/A
I. ...
N/A
Lot Coverage:
30%
1,23%.
Yes
® Ordinance 02 (2000) Amendment — Adopted 4/4/UU, Effective 5/4/00
Other City Division's Review
The City's Public Works Division and Building and Safety Division reviewed this project. Their
recommendations are included in the attached draft resolution.
1
Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section 15303(a), the
City has determined that the proposed project is Categorically Exempt in accordance with the CEQA
Guidelines.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING:
On December 1, 2000, public hearing notices were mailed to approximately 30 property owners within
a 500 -foot radius of the project site. On December 1, 2000, notice for this project was published in the
Inland Valley Daily Bulletin and the San Gabriel Valley Tribune. Furthermore, on December 2, 2000,
the project site was posted with a display board.
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review No. 2000-15. Findings
of Fact and Conditions of Approval as listed within the attached draft resolution.
1. The design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with the General Plan,
development standards of the applicable district, design guidelines, and architectural criteria for
special areas (e.g., theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards or planned
developments);
2. The design of the proposed development will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of
neighboring existing or future developments, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards;
3. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the character of the
surrounding neighborhood and will maintain and enhance the harmonious orderly and attractive
development contemplated by this Chapter, the General Plan, or any applicable specific plan;
4. The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and
visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture and color,
and will remain aesthetically appealing;
5. The proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or
materially injurious (e.g., negative affect on property values or resale(s) of property) to the
properties or improvements in the vicinity; and
6. The proposed project has been reviewed in accordance with the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
4
Prepared by: --------
LDM Associates
Contract Planner
Attachments:
1. Draft Resolution;
I Application;
3. Tree Preservation Statements;
4. Exhibit "A" — site plan, floor plan,
plan and colors/materials board; and
5. Black and white rendering.
elevations, preliminary grading plan, preliminary landscape
0
A.
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMIVIISSION OF THE CITY
OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO.
2000-15, AND A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, A REQUEST TO
CONSTRUCT A TWO STORY, 9,471 SQUARE FOOT SINGLE-
FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH AN ATTACHED 1,546 SQUARE FOOT
THREE -GARAGE AND A 400 SQUARE FOOT GAZEBO ON A
VACANT PARCEL. THE PROJECT SITE IS LOCATED AT 1819
DERRINGER LANE (LOT 2, TRACT 24046), DIAMOND BAR,
CALIFORNIA.
RECITALS.
1. The property owner, Hardip Gill, and applicant Chary Dagam, have filed an application
for Development Review No. 2000-15 for property located at 1819 Derringer Lane,
Diamond Bar, Los Angeles County, California. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the
subject Development Review and Categorical Exemption shall be referred to as the
"Application."
2. On December 1, 2000, public hearing notices were mailed to approximately 30 property
owners within a 500 -foot radius of the project site, and posted in three public places.
On December 1, 2000, notification of the public hearing for this project was provided
in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and the Inland VallaRgily Bulletin newspapers. On
December 2, 2000, the project site was posted with a display board.
3. On December 12, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar continued
the duly noticed public hearing to its regular meeting on January 23, 2001.
4. On January 23, 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted
and concluded a duly noticed public hearing on the Application.
RESOLUTION.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of
the City of Diamond Bar as follows:
This Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the
Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The Planning Commission hereby finds that the Environmental Categorical Exemption
has been prepared by the City of Diamond Bar in compliance with the requirements of
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970 as amended and guidelines
1
, cal
promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15303(a). Furthermore, the cate g i
exemption reflects the independent judgement of the City of Diamond Bar.
3. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds and determines that, having
considered the record as a whole including the findings set forth below, and changes and
alterations which have been incorporated into. and conditioned upon the proposed project
set forth in the Application, there is no evidence before this Planning Commission that
the project proposed herein will have the potential of an adverse effect on wildlife
resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Based upon substantial
evidence, this Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effects
contained in Section 753.5(d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
4. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein, this Planning Commission hereby
finds as follows:
(a) The project relates to a vacant parcel of land created by Tract No. 24046, which
is located within a gated community identified as "The Country Estates". The
site contains 1.56 net acres of land area. It is rectangular shaped vacant lot,
sloping downward from Diamond Knoll Lane to the north at a ratio of
approximately 4:1. The property is encumbered with a variety of easements for
incidental purposes such as pole lines, utilities, and recreational trails, etc toward
the rear. The site has been previously graded; it slopes in a westerly direction
and it does not contain any mature trees.
(b) The project site has a General Plan land use designation of RR (Rural
Residential).
(c) The project site has a zoning designation of R-1, 40,000 (Single -Family
Residence -Minimal Lot Size- 40,000 Square Feet).
(d) Generally, the site is surrounded to the north, south, east and west with R-1,
40,000 zoned property.
(e) The application request is to construct a two-story, a 9471 square foot single-
family residence with an attached 1546 square foot three car garage and a 400
square foot gazebo.
Development Review
(f) The design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with the
applicable elements of the City's General Plan, City Design Guidelines, and the
development standards of the applicable district, design guidelines, and
architectural criteria for special areas (e.g., theme areas, specific plans,
community plans, boulevards or planned developments).
On July 25, 1995, the City adopted its General Plan. The proposed project i�
consistent with the General Plan land use designation and complies wit�-the
General Plan land use goals, objectives and strategies. Additionally, the
proposed project has obtained the approval of "The Country Estates"
architectural committee approval.
(g) The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the
use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future development and will not
create traffic or pedestrian hazards.
The project site is an existing vacant single-family residential parcel of land
surrounded by existing residential development to the east, south and west. The
.design and layout of the proposed project would complete and compliment the
development of the existing neighborhood. The design and use of the private
streets within the project vicinity contemplated the eventual development of the
project site. As such, the development in use of the project site will not interfere
with.the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future development and
will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards.
(h) The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment
for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through the use of
quality materials, texture, and color that will remain aesthetically appealing as
defined by the City's design guidelines.
The proposed project is consistent with the surrounding development in terms
of mass and scale. The design of the proposed project is consistent with the
City's design guidelines and existing development within the surrounding
neighborhood. The proposed project complies with the minimum setback
requirements set forth in the City's Development Code. Access to the proposed
project is obtained from a fully developed private street.
(i) The proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety
or welfare nor will it be materially injurious (e.g., negative affect on property
values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity.
Before the issuance of City development permits, the proposed project is
required to comply with all conditions set forth in this resolution and the
requirements of the Building and Safety Division, Public Works Division, and
Fire Department. The referenced agencies, through the permit and inspection
process, will ensure that the proposed project will not be detrimental to the
public health, safety or welfare nor will it be materially injurious to the
properties or improvements in the vicinity.
(j) The proposed project has been reviewed for compliance with the provisions of
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
3
Pursuant to Section 15303(a), the City has determined that the proposed project
is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA).
5. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth above, the Planning Commission hereby
approves the Application subject to compliance with the following con icons:
(a) The project shall substantially conform to site plan, floor plans, elevations,
grading plan, landscape/irrigation plan and materials/colors board collectively
labeled as Exhibit "A" as submitted and approved by the Planning Commission
on January 23, 2001, and as amended herein.
(b) The site shall be maintained in a condition, which is free of debris both during
and after the construction, addition, or implementation of the entitlement granted
herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether during or
subsequent to construction shall be done only by the property owner, the
applicant or by a.duly permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by
the City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste from
residential, commercial, construction, and industrial areas within the City. It
shall be the applicant's obligation to insure that the waste contractor utilized has
obtained permits from the City of Diamond Bar to provide such services.
(c) The applicant shall be required to submit a final landscape/irrigation plan
delineating the type of planting materials color, size, quantity and location, for
review and approval by the planning staff. The landscaping and irrigation shall
be installed prior to final inspection or the issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy.
(d) The landscape plan shall include provisions for the gazebo. Fencing and
retaining walls shall comply with the provision of Chapter 22.20 of the City's
Development Code (Fences, Hedges and Walls). Retaining walls shall not
exceed an exposed height of six feet.
(e) The single-family residence shall not be utilized in a manner that creates adverse
effects upon the neighborhood and environmental setting as to levels of dust,
glare/light, noise, odor, traffic, or other similar types of disturbances. Nor shall
the project be operated so as to result in significantly adverse effects on public
services and resources. The single-family residence shall not be used for
commerciaVinstitutional purposes, or otherwise used in conflict with the City's
zoning regulations. The property shall not be used for regular gatherings which
result in a nuisance or which create traffic and parking problems in the
neighborhood.
N
``1
(f) The applicant shall complete and record, on a form to be provided by the City,
a "Covenant and Agreement to Maintain a Single Family Residence"._ The
covenant must be completed and recorded in the Los Angeles County Recorder's
Office prior to the issuance of a building permit.
(g) Before construction begins, the applicant shall install temporary construction
fencing pursuant to the Building and Safety Division's requirements along the
project site's perimeter. This fencing shall remain until the Building Official
approves its removal.
(h) The Applicant shall provide temporary sanitation facilities while the site is
subject to construction activity.
(i) Before the issuance of any City permits, the applicant shall submit an erosion
control plan for the Building Department's review and approval. The erosion
control plan shall conform to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) standards and incorporate the appropriate Best Management Practices
(BMP's). Additionally, the Applicant shall obtain the necessary NPDES
permits.
0) Applicant shall submit a soils report for the proposed improvements to be
reviewed and approved by the City. The preparation of the: site and the
construction of the proposed structures shall be in compliance with the
recommendations set forth in such soils report.
(k) - A grading plan review and approval shall be required for cut/fill quantities
greater than 50 cubic yards; otherwise a fine grade/drainage plan shall be filed
with the City's Engineering Division.
(1) A fine grade certification shall be required before building final.
(m) . Drainage patterns shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Division;
surface water shall drain away from the building at a 2% minimum slope.
(n) Site, driveway grade, and project design shall be subject to review and approved
by the Fire Department. The maximum driveway slope is 15% per the Public
Works Division.
(o) Due to the site's topography, applicant shall comply with special design
requirements as specified in the Uniform Building Code, Section 18.4.3,
building setback, top and toe of slopes.
(p) The single-family structure shall meet the 1998 California Building Code,
California Plumbing Code, California Mechanical Code, and California
Electrical Code requirements.
5
(q) The minimum design wind pressure shall be 80 miles per hour and "C" exposure.
(r) All balconies shall be designed for 40 pound per square foot live load.
(s) Handrails and guardrails shall be designed for 20 -pound load applied laterally
at the top of the rail. -
(t) The single-family structure is located in "Fire Zone 4" and shall meet the
following requirements of that fire zone:
(1) All roof covering shall be "Fire Retardant, Class A"; the roofs shall be fire
stopped at the eaves to preclude entry of the flame or members under the
fire;
(2) All enclosed under -floor areas shall be constructed as exterior walls;
(3) All openings into the attic, floor, and/or other enclosed areas shall be
covered with corrosion -resistant wire mesh not less than '/a inch nor more
than 1/z inch in any dimension except where such openings are equipped
with sash or door;
(4) Chimneys shall have spark arresters of maximum '/a inch screen.
(u) This single-family structure shall meet the State Energy Conservation Standards.
(v) All sleeping rooms shall have windows that comply with egress requirements.
(w) Smoke detectors shall be provided in conformance with the 1998 California
Building Code.
(x) Applicant shall make application to the water purveyor as necessary, and shall
submit the evidence of their approval to the Planning Division prior to the
issuance of building permits.
(y) Maximum height of the residence shall not exceed 35 feet from the finish grade
at any exterior wall of the structure to the highest point of the roofline. Evidence
of compliance with this requirement may require a height survey at completion
of framing.
(z) All utility service to the proposed project shall be installed underground.
(aa) This entitlement is valid for two (2) years and shall be exercised
(i.e., construction shall commence) within that period or this entitlement shall
automatically expire. A one (1) year extension may be approved when
submitted to the City in writing at least 60 days prior to the expiration date. The
Planning Commission may consider the extension request at a duly noticed
public hearing in accordance with Chapter 22.72 of the City -,of. Diamond Bar
Development Code.
(bb) This entitlement shall not be effective for any purpose until the permittee and
owner of the property involved (if other than the permittee) have filed, within
fifteen (15) days of the approval date, at the City of Diamond Bar Community
and Development Services Department, their affidavit stating that they are aware
of and agree to accept all the conditions of this grant. Further, this grant shall
not become effective until the permittee pays any remaining City processing
fees.
The Planning Commission shall:
(a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and
(b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, to:
Chary Dagam, 1000 Regal Canyon Drive, Walnut, CA 91789, and Mr. Hardip
Gill, 100 Stagecoach Circle, West Covina, CA 91791.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23rd DAY OF JANUARY 2001, BY THE
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR.
DUN
Steve Nelson, Chairman
I, James DeStefano, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was
duly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar, at a regular
meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of January 2001, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
James DeStefano, Secretary
1
y L11 Y UP I A1V1V1`1.0
COMMUNL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FPL #
21660 E. Copley Drive Suite 190 Deposit S
(909)396-5676 Fax (909)861-3117 Rcccrpt#
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION By -' • ;r "{
�:,;."•' Date Rec'd
Record Owner /Applicant/'} y� Applicant's Agent
Name 61''liu2 44A -KD F? Q-Ae ) A - AA
(Last name fust) i (Last name
`f est)) / (Last name first)
Address ��� `�/ 1�1G'► ��i�"Gl� /Art t/l�'' [i�H W '
C\N V T -
p nppp P01) /iO —T ,q
Phone( �a)
NOTE: It is the applicant's responsibility to notify the Community Development Director in writing of any change of the
principals involved during the processing of this case. -
(Attach a scpamte sheet, if necessary, including names, addresses, and signatures of members of partnerships, joint ventures, and directors
of corporations.)
Consent: I certify that Iiam the owner of the herein described property and permit the applicant to file this request.
Signed �(Y �. Date of • � 2- • 9 D
(All record owners)
Certification.- I, the undersigned, hereby certify under penalty of pedury that the information herein provided is correct
to the best of my knowledge.
Print Name 6�PA-7" '► ' " \
(Applicant or Agen
JASigned law,, Date
lAnnlicark or Agent)
Location Orw".! g'
(Street address or tract and lot number)
Zoning _ iiI1M AM'S
Previous Cases Pr 13 /S�2.1 Z -
Present Use of Site i
Use applied for
.... j'i,•Ck; GL 1�,�1w�5� �' vt� �� �.,,� � c��-gyp/� t^-t,}�- }
regi
'' 'VT.rl v t
l.Cga! ucS(.-npuur4 kai. v..., ....,� ... .... a _ r-
Vl,4rAA) 13A-)K- et'V -r-f Pr -
w )2-te,-Y vP6- A ivi
1, V
of
�1t17-1---
Area devoted to structures' l Landscaping/Open space
Project Size l 1 Lot Coverage ! f Proposed densityb N V� ` Ae- l�
Style of Architecture
1'i It /ar 1-1 (Units/Acres)
Number of Floors Proposed Slope of Roof �:E
Grading• If yes, Quantity
Gilt Fill
Import If yes, Quantity
Export If yes, Quantity
u
TREE PRESERVATION STATEMENT
The subject property contains no oak, walnut, sycamore, willow, or naturalized
California Pepper trees.
[ ] The subject property contains one or more oak, walnut, sycamore, willow, or
naturalized California Pepper trees. The applicant anticipates that no activity
(grading and/or construction) will take place within five (5) feet of the outer
dripline of any oak, walnut, sycamore, willow, or naturalized California Pepper
tree.
[ ] The subject property contains one or more oak, walnut, sycamore, willow, or
naturalized California Pepper trees. The applicant states that activity (grading
and/or construction) will take place within five (5) feet of the outer dripline
of any oak, walnut, sycamore, willow, or naturalized California Pepper tree. A
Tree Permit has been or will be applied for prior to any activity taking place on
the property.
(Applicant's Si nature;
q - 1z -ate
(Date)
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
PROPOSED NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
FOR
DEVELOPER'S NAME
PHONE NUMBER
FOR MORE INFORMATION
CONTACT THE
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
(909) 3965676
r
Please place a detailed Notice of Public Hearing here.
You use a copy of the Notice of Public Hearing that is mailed to the
surrounding property owners.
4
Font size and.lettering should be proportionate with the size of the sign.
Post this sign at the project site at least 10 days before the public hearing.
Take pictures of the sign once it is posted at the site.
You will need to turn these pictures in to the City. The pictures will be
retained as part of the applicant's file.
�(E a ���a� *•75 •76 •f f jy o 9i mi�u 1 c4 �6�L � 16 r. + a++o,,►asr
♦ rr0 IY jj �7 ry N,h f{'! I �Q �F/� 11 r.
O ``
h / ♦ \ /
► 73 30 a+ �;nt wt al > s 8 9 9
®72 x " �� 7 3B h a. ' M5 9 Seale . r N
�" '�'7Mi•.t�� ��� h'
rw! 21 `;s " :.7F !"�' 9 ' .~< �� �'�' y �D ♦t 12 `�•a/�.q `"`-�..,�t°i>r tU� " ° •'r r
,>7026 ? Mtl! ,� �,� ��rii h�,`�• ? ylhi 8 �' I,,y88 a J,�� � � 6�♦ �,
I
65
O lJf.07 k
(] t!b ♦1. ru.» tiih O r.t►x r .J%C�ite 4.._ir '" ~ -J Si
1�IIiIY '+ M.K r
n � , i a18� � �� - $h r Oi: i� jnoT � • \ ^ 'v CO
u� - 11111r 4
� Z
66
rt.,u•' A' 7 ` �s�l5j r .. o r ti G4 i9 P ¢•� /a/c. /�o/•i_/� i �' N1t'h
6T 6
10�c,
�0 1� I
. r 0. nr:
O
A
3 S '' !t /•aa
a ♦ 1�� `
n131
ti �• ,� x � Y.N 4419 !
-_—�'kr lad 11 12��--•
G r c ya �r aJQD 11 >e 1 `ira
4
X 71 .Z:. rC ♦ ` � 1
V Lust . W91 `T ✓ll� /, 3 11.;/r%S>< \R w e r b
`�`uw i213 B3� �qf^ z� 1� i•st"St SF.y, f, Gl.
4.4r •so si ! PSI N n',•
•f r'9 l
m.A �Zl— a 'Am!h /9).% $ !'All � \ d1j f1�
uz Its
0091 ,ri11 S/GlQ.+ /i� �9 `ZCDoOIPSE�:
er
.? '3 r
6 �- �N
►HEaj�
_ �a_ • �l J/�,P-�'f .'' „ry�1 - � fit'' �,�• � i7D � i p � �t`'A1L, p tTr6oC�•��
+95D ' 4 15 � T d+ yam. ��/ ' ',�` ~'• � •~"c'?' ,�iN� , .
6 6I �,� 16 p� ']' as
(3 i*6- . - 8�y Z39�1 V ,t\\ �'�~a� S CJI e+ r�
z Sl
62 ¢ O
1� 237, y 51 R I DG
91q
it lill, 49.21 1,2 d b 7E� y..
' t'j9 h.il 111.21 ` ' ' .. _ .. C2 b r • :iO �
,z'0i" z38fo 'n SY—N.Si t♦S9e� r ¢ y ,�
�,� roti• zasa� z38ya z� 6 s �, �z� a !�
82 a i _ _ GT _ ti� ,n
City of Diamond Bar PROJECT
Development Review
Exzxr 1 IT No. 2000-15
lay 11 LA -1► 1819 Derringer Ln.
Location Map
Ti•c, � r �; � {rte .' . 1^ J i "'z„c
her ��K�, �.r.. •�, ;. •�J J'ds= '/. .: 6..
4.�;.rr,'h tip•' :- kI' t H
JlSjJ ••.y 1
" � 1
J; �tir' A./ } � Jai`.• �.
th, i 'n r = • 'C �t
rAi 4 C'>' t•r J,. 3 - C -j 1 ice_
rD
XIN
tr•
y`�, S� J. �3.t ti•J•:,'sJrt�l il:.=_y
Q1 V
1t..
r �i. r r ft .y ' . F .' `'�'ac.•
�, �� t. { 1, ✓�•.. �. �� �,
J^"•' l �1 t
r4 .O
r • -y
t f r � •,kf� L�,�
� t'�iit�* „•.r1�f a 1 � [s(r i yA J j
s :
!eT
�-,
Ml
EI
;tt
s
++ t 1
�y ( � r, i♦+igyp � j _�• . p
� 5 •a S 3
it y � � 9'.• . \
3
e
•
,�� i j I i I
M
i
C' ,i•1 ���7 •1
� a
W �•
G 7G•�'T'�'•1
/*
;rteC-
L7
77 1
In
Ulu
F--Nl
In
I
II
In
is
In
-wLrw-r Ar •rIp • ^M1
ET
66Li4 n 1: �l•1 'p.^. Wr' ^+'4i +.`X. '
w+�..+n: •71+7 jneyh �0 :��, �
�Xtru+7)v
p.Y' 'f4fIJOgC
.Wr.•Yln ..s�_I _ '1'�!� 90{.7 p'S{.{ = � � �
7 � ��y.1n, 1M✓ iM MM:.M�j V ,
z
M
�
�
�
i 1
7�
t �i
�
a
) t
C
3
t •'
�
i 1
;i Fx
Fq
r•1
lu
A
� "I
� a
a
vl
HI
1 4
IN
-ILI
MI
L J:
tO
Eli
� � i
.✓ 7 �1.
~�
' N/ Qo �a �huP
' . v � YeylPeNce prF I - .
e N� �t M �-,iw
q � R'� S �'
7 E e� � � ( i Vm N. mal. tHN. M. w^uwr� r. q�r�r
IFN OG{Wr�FF U+w I �V.G.tlNY+ •FK�✓IRLi 1n• a�NSM4
GItMdNn PA4'��
E
I
f�
u
1
0
iy
W u
a.m � a •^
r ;�1
a
4.-^' n
4
E
I
f�
u
�.� � d.�i�.r �.�5 �.£ � e�
W u
a.m � a •^
r ;�1
a
4.-^' n
Vii:.=�.=•.�a
^r}r 5
S 4 (
T i J � 'k � :t •��,
1
�'-`�,r � , ; + a � � :1 ;;.•, � by � .
h
/ t� •` �_ _� \ I. y' �c� � � ��>°��' � Ir>w�fi a��� � g�����crcc`
A __----' _ �' 1��•BOOrJ 00000—Wl
A
>B T
•t .c
S
a
�s
c
�
a
T i J � 'k � :t •��,
1
�'-`�,r � , ; + a � � :1 ;;.•, � by � .
h
/ t� •` �_ _� \ I. y' �c� � � ��>°��' � Ir>w�fi a��� � g�����crcc`
A __----' _ �' 1��•BOOrJ 00000—Wl
i
�v
/ / lo --'-.'e t•
. • _....i/ � -ria : '� i - ` / /' -
i , i ' �7i,. •, •'ii
w �
r / —F— %`•
, � m J�".�y+ir3 r k\ k,-- a 1. .,✓,lro�xp• . 6.. � _ I� ../ .� .r. ... , ... - > ��.
I �
k
4y�`x1�4��r �, �/ ,� L•
.. � — •flr7 M1c t�
r
� ••{ _.1__,_ �` _ _,_- � � � � � M s � S -Act I
tE
P. EZ
L TI
/ 1' IR.
: c
32
vkv
Tj
i
1 �
1j11I �I t ,.�I
+ '^'n i �fi�: � , } � !.� •• � 1 /. - _. : � 1 •, ' � it .. i ' � i €3•• n . ;,
! VL
1
F 1�1L":Vae
�'�10t'I✓U-' (�-�
HW. GFl •2r� V7 QD•�d� GCtI''"/ ISL. (1l�IJNiisT
ilK kl-1L�y.
3 f
tt I
i
'Y1
Li565 4.4. :%AllYs.�Y • .xML'1'n
' arF+� yra.+tyaraa bigl ...
'OH
T11'-? 4a .�W:
' J+YU.Yq. lyi..w :74! LT+M•yj 4.
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Chairman and Planning Commissioners
FROM: Ann J. Lungu, Associate Planner, ql/
SUBJECT: Re -roofing of 1557 Meadow Glen Road, Diamond Bar CA
DATE: January 18, 2001
On Wednesday, January 17, 2001, it was brought to the City's
attention that the garage roof of the subject residence was
replaced. As a result, the garage now has agray composition roof
and the rest of the residential structure has the original shake
shingle roof. Research indicated that the property owner did not
obtain a permit for re -roofing.
On January 17, 2001, the City's Code Enforcement Officer, Al Flores
spoke with the property owner of the subject residence. At that
time, the property owner was informed that a re -roofing permit was
required and given 30 days to resolve the matter. On January 18,
2001, a correspondence was sent to the property owner confirming
the conversation of the day before. Also on January 18, 2001, the
property owner called the City's Code Enforcement officer, agreed
to obtain the re -roofing permit and plans to obtain a permit to re -
roof the whole residential structure.
The City's Development Code does not specify that re -roofing of a
structure be completed in its entirety. The City's Design
Guidelines recommends that a roof consist of materials and colors
that blend with the natural environment. Bright or reflective
colors and materials should be avoided. It has been the City's
policy that when re -roofing a portion of the structure all new
materials matched existing. However, in order to accommodate a
resident due to financial hardship, the City has allowed phasing of
a re -roofing project, thereby having the project completed within
six months to one year.
Attachment:
Correspondence from the City of Diamond Bar dated January 18, 2001
Robert S. Huff
Mayor
Carol Herrera
Mayor Pro Tem
Eileen R. Ansad
Council Member
Wen Chang
Council Member
Deborah H. O'Connor
Council Member
Recvded paper
1. 1; A
21660 E. Copley Drive, Suite 100 - Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4177
(909) 860-2489 Fax (909) 861-311;
www.CitvofDiamondBar.com
January 18, 2001 Case -No. -1 -003 --
Marcia Wall
1557 Meadow Glen Road
Diamond Bar, CA 91765-3026
Re: 1557 Meadow Glen Road, Diamond Bar, CA
Dear Resident:
This letter*confirms our conversation on January 17, 2001. To reiterate, you
recently re -roofed your residence without a City building permit, which is
required. You have 30 days from the date of our conversation on January 17,
2001, to obtain permits from the City of Diamond Bar Building & Safety Division
to resolve this -matter.
The City appreciates your cooperation. As a resident of Diamond Bar, we
encourage you to participate in maintaining the safety and integrity.of the City.
Should you have any questions, please contact me at (909) 396-5676 ext.. 251.
in e
Al or
Code Enforcement Officer
cc: James DeStefano, Interim City Manager
AF:sm
no
u
2 -R
0Z, Z,
1
R.
u 0
C14
z
z
z
V)
En
V)
CN
u
w
u
LIJ
u
O
0
cn
0
N
z
C-4
Aa
u �
z V)
z
0
cq
z 00
0
a
0
0
0a
U
vi
oa
tr)
C24
C14
R
\0
C?
m
Q)
C)
0
0
C)
C)
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
s
eq
H
A
O
cz
u
zz
o
a
z
Cl)FH
UU
u
z E
0
U
C14C-
�c
;-
0
00
00
00
eq
CD
0
It
—
0
"I
C)
�o
00
czz i
th
cr-
d
0 0
W E
V)
CN
0 ctsW
U
Q,
zz
00 ,
-04
>
U
u
0
z
C�
C14
C) R
C1 (:? 4
,t (RC)
—
o
0
0
CD
o
0
0
0
C)
C:)
00
0
0
C
cz
U
C)
0
cl
ti
rA
U U
c
a u*
40-
0
o4 C2
ne
W1:4
0
0
U
u
U
0
u E'-
z
0-4
z
z
0
U3
w
d
z
.2
no
u
2 -R
0Z, Z,
1
R.
off •.
CL X
z
z
z
V)
En
V)
u
w
u
LIJ
u
O
0
0
0
z
C-4
Aa
u
z V)
z
0
z 00
0
a
0
0
vi
N
tr)
C24
C14
R
\0
C?
m
Q)
C)
0
0
C)
C)
0
0
0
0
0
W
NO
U
eq
C14
>
u
u
Cl)FH
u
z E
0
U
CO
-6
OA
a
a o
o 4)
C7
Z
C)
V)
V)
czz i
th
cr-
d
0 0
W E
V)
z
0-4
0 ctsW
U
Q,
zz
00 ,
-04
>
U
u
0
z
off •.
CL X
to
fn
cJ
U
0
0
0
0
N
NOTE: All persons may attend meetings and address the Planning Commission. This form is intended
to assist the Chairman in ensuring that all persons wishing to address the Commission will
have the opportunity and to ensure correct spelling of names in the Minutes.
January 16, 2001
CCCLUTE ENTERPRISES
21217 FOUNTAIN SPRINGS RD.
DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765
PHN 909-595-1827 FAX 909-595-1827
e-mail —
City of Diamond Bar
21660 Copley Drive, Suite 190
Diamond Bar, Ca. 91765
To: Community and Development Services, Planning Division
RE: C.U.P #2000-02 at 21400 Pathfinder Road, Diamond Bar High School
The following concerns are with regard to the proposed installation of a Telecommunications
Facility, by Metricom, on the property of the Diamond Bar High School. The aspects, which
concern the residents within close proximity to the site, are outlined below for discussion.
I. Designed Functionality and Co -location Alternatives:
A) Drawings indicate no array in the direction of the freeway, northwest. If the intent of
the use is more commercial and residential then commuter; then is there a more
suitable site? What is the intended functional use of this facility?
B) Multiple telecommunication facilities exist within the same site area. Are any of these
existing locations suitable for such an installation? (Clock Tower, High School
Gymnasium, High School Field Press Box/Bleachers, other school facility buildings)
C) Alternative locations at existing commercial zoned buildings. (West of Pathfinder and
57 Freeway)
D) Alternative 'masking' or camouflaging techniques that could be incorporated. The
antennae are in the normal landscape view of the neighborhood residents.
Structural Engineering and Design:
A) Drawings indicate three arrays, with an odd or uneven configuration. Will there be the
need for a 'fourth' array to the northwest?
B) Is this uneven configuration calculated into any engineering design analysis for the
existing monopole? Is the possible fourth array calculated into any engineering
design analysis?
C) Proposed antennae arrays are substantially larger in area and mass then the existing
antenna arrays? Is a 'four array' configuration being used in the calculation for 'wind -
load' analysis.
D) Will the proposed equipment cabinet have a self-contained cooling unit? What is the
expected sound level of this unit?
E) How does this equipment cabinet compare in size to other similar installations and
does there exist the opportunity to enlarge this equipment cabinet in the future, as
demand increases? Does this cabinet allow for expandability within its proposed
dimensions and power requirements?
January 16, 2001
Ill. Utilities Installation
A) Drawings do not indicate existing utility conduit lines or the existing utility pedestals at
the proposed public utilities connection. Proposed pedestal/meter location will, in all
likelihood be denied by the Edison for access reasons; as with the other facilities at
this site. (See: Monopole Site Plan)
B) Co -location should be considered at one of the existing utility pedestals. The existing
Nextel utility pedestal is thought to have the capability of a second electricity meter
and telephone line.
C) Drawings do not indicate existing sprinkler lines, which parallel the property line,
adjacent to and below the site along slopes. (See: Monopole Site Plan)
IV. Landscape Plan
A) Drawings do not accurately indicate the existing landscape (trees) that are in the path
of the proposed underground utility trench. Most of these trees were recently planted
as part of the Nextel facility installation. '(Carrotwood and Eucalyptus)
B) Drawings do not indicate the existing ground cover (Honeysuckle) that was also
planted by the school district, from funds obtained from the Nextel facility installation.
C) All existing landscape should be noted with full and immediate replacement, including
ground cover. All sprinkler damage should be noted as being the contractors'
responsibility to repair, immediately; along with notification of the appropriate School
District personnel.
D) The unimproved area adjoining the existing service road, cul-de-sac should be
.included into the landscape plan. This would allow for a much-needed aesthetic
improvement to the area of joint ownership. (Walnut Valley Water I Walnut Valley
School District) This area has long been an eye sore to the neighborhood, as is the
rest of Brea Canyon Blvd south of this location.
E) Continuation of the existing fence screening material from the southwest corner to
the second perpendicular fence of the equipment site; installed along the west
property fence. (approximately 12 sections of fence or 100')
Sincerely,
Craig C. Clute
UliliiUl 11:23 PAA btbU533U4.9 Yuri
\Netri om\Diew A Ber\New CD\IOONEO76AI4.drg Tue Jan.09 IT 05:11 2001 DAUTEN
R�
•R Qp�
q�q�R
SOL
` a n Z Cllu iv�°i �•
U1/ ZZ/ U1 11 : 1Z PAA 616JJJJU40 1111 4pJ UUli UUP
r
the global let t er
IN TELECO Vl1 t7uTSOURCING
101 S. First Sti eet, Suite 202
Burbank, CA' 1502
(818) 953-3040
(818) 953-3049 Fax
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL
TO: FAX:
FROM: DATE: 1/21
RE: PAGES:
—2 -
Message:
PAvL,-
't7-'
~
,4 ; f
S" -C -&JI-` -7 1S ",3,7 �Uj5(j�(��- -%jLis (
J
1.
Januay 19 2001
TDePL of B. dg. & Safety
City of: M. Mond Bar
21400 Pad fwder Road
Diammd 1 er, CA
Re: Spectr LSite-Verizon Tower CA -5220
Address;
Deaf' Sir.
This is to E dvise you that Speetra%te Communications, Inc., n)Ana,xig wireless eoxr>I1nuliicatiom
sites on be calf of Verizon Wireless conducted a structural analysis for the above refeitied site. The
results of t ze study as conducted by Engineer, Mr. Abdol Messih, see attached letter, refleat9 that
the propos .d improvement to the tower Le addition and attachment of a screen, will xuot be
feasible or d the tower will not meat the requirements of TIA/TiA,-222 F with the screen mounted
on the top,
We would very much appreciate City's concern and assistance to allow ,SpvctraSite
Conunuri Cations Inc. to proceed without adding any additional load on the tower,
Sincerely,
Harty Hai bbani
Senior Co .istruction Manager
SpactraSP a Cor=unications
Southern "alifomia
cc,
NO. 559370
Exp. wall -al
\`CIVIL <
or
Direatar ofagine4-'nng
Spcatr� eSiie Gamn'unicaciana, Inc_ www.SpecirBSite.com
= itt Avenue S . Settle, COA99108 - TeI 20066.000 . Pax 206.76a6710
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
AND AFFIDA-VIT-,OF -POSTIN
SIN
,.,.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
On January 23, 2001, at 7:00 P.M., the Diamond Bar Planning Commission will hold a
regular meeting at the South Coast Quality Management District Auditorium, 21865 East Copley
Drive, Diamond Bar, California.
Items for consideration are listed on the attached agenda.
1, Stella Marquez, declare as follows:
I am employed by the City of DiMd Bar, Community and Development Services
Department. On January _19,200V- I p'okeq]!Wes of the Notice for the Regular Meeting of the
Diamond Bar Planni ', ;&sfofi,,toby JliaWabn January 23, 2001, at the following location:
fag
� �� ' '
City Hall South Coast Quality Management District Auditorium
21660 E. Copley Drive 21865 East Copley Drive
Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Diamond Bar, CA 91765
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on January 22, 2001, at Diamond Bar, California.
Stella Marquez
Community and Development Services Dept.
gA\affidavitposfing.doc
ins end is ready for
v
and is heady f®r
c ®n y City Ciet�