Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/28/2003FILE COPY Ll CA Viaffi��� January 8 2003 . 7-000 P.M. Copies of staff reports or other written documentation relating to agenda items are on file in the Planning Division of the Dept. of Community & Development Services, located at 21625 E. Copley Drive, and are available for public inspection. If you have questions regarding an agenda item, please call (909) 396-5676 during regular business hours. In an effort to comply with the requirements of Title 11 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the City of Diamond Bar requires that any person in need of any type of special equipment, assistance or accommodation(s) in order to communicate at a City public meeting must inform the Dept. of Community & Development Services at (909) 3965676 a minimum of 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting. a refrain from smoking, eating or drinking in the Auditorium City of diamond Bar uses recycled paper and encourages you to do the same City of Diamond Bar Planning Commission MEETING RULES mnl The meetings of the Diamond Bar Planning Commission are open to the public. A member of the public may address the Commission on the subject of one or more agenda items and/or other- items of which are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Diamond Bar Planning Commission. A request to address the Commission should be submitted in writing at the public hearing, to the Secretary of the Commission. As a general rule, the opportunity for public comments will take place at the discretion of the Chair. However, in order to facilitate the meeting, persons who are interested parties for an item may be requested to give their presentation at the time the item is called on the calendar. The Chair may limit individual public input to five minutes on any item; or the Chair may limit the total amount of time allocated for public testimony based on the number of people requesting to speak and the business of the Commission. Individuals are requested to conduct themselves in a professional and businesslike manner. Comments and questions are welcome so that all points of view are considered prior to the Commission making recommendations to the staff and City Council. In accordance with State Law (Brown Act), all matters to be acted on by the Commission must be posted at least 72 hours prior to the Commission meeting. In case of emergency or when a subject matter arises subsequent to the posting of the agenda, upon making certain findings, the Commission may act on item that is not on the posted agenda. IMF ®I2IVIATIDN RELATING TO AGE AS ATiII9 ACTT®NS ®E TIIE C®M1i3ISSI®N Agendas for Diamond Bar Planning Commission meetings are prepared by the Planning Division of the Community and Development Services Department. Agendas are available 72 hours prior to the meeting at City Hall and the public library, and may be accessed by personal computer at the number below. Every meeting of the Planning Commission is recorded on cassette tapes and duplicate tapes are available for a nominal charge. /f • A cordless microphone is available for those persons with mobility impairments who cannot access the public speaking area. The service of the cordless microphone and sign language interpreter services are available by giving notice at least three business days in advance of the meeting. Please telephone (909) 396-5676 between 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m., Monday through Thursday, and 7:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Friday. HELEFUL PHONE NUMBERS Copies of Agenda, Rules of the Commission, Cassette Tapes of Meetings (909) 396-5676 Computer Access to Agendas (909) 860 -LINE General Agendas (909) 396-5676 email: info@ci.diamond-bar.ca.us Wiffile, Next Resolution No. 2002-49 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. 1. ROLL CALL: COMMISSIONERS: Chairman Joe Ruzicka, Vice -Chairman Steve Tye, Steve Nelson, Dan Nolan, and Jack Tanaka This is the time and place for the general public to address the members of the Planning Commission on any item that is within their jurisdiction, allowing the public an opportunity to speak on non-public hearing and non -agenda items. Please complete a Speaker's Card for the recording Secretary _(Completion of this form is voluntary.A There is a five-minute maximum time limit when addressing the Planning Commission. The following items listed on the consent calendar are considered routine and are approved by a single motion. Consent calendar items may be removed from the agenda by request of the Commission only: 4.1 Minutes of Regular Meeting: December 10, 2002 5. OLD BUSINESS: N ' r r q z. 7 A M!"J .1 ';it. M -U] Hr. January 28, 2003 Page 2 PLANNING COMMISSION totaling approximately 70,370 square feet of gross building area. The proposed development will be located on an approximate 6.50 gross acre site, (Public Hearing closed on December 10, 2002.) Project Address: 850 Brea Canyon Road Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Property Owner: Louis Marcellin 20326 Fuerte Drive Walnut, CA 91789 Applicant: Phil Williams (Extended Stay America) 2525 Cherry Avenue, #310 Signal Hill, CA 90806 Environmental Determination: This project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on that assessment, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact was prepared and is available for review at City of Diamond Bar Community and Development Services Department/Planning Division during regular business hours. Comments regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration were accepted until October 22, 2002. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt resolutions recommending City Council approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2002-01, Zone Change No. 2002-01, Specific Plan No. 2002-01; continue the Planning Commission deliberation of Development Review No. 2002-07, Conditional Use Permit No. 2002-05, Tentative Parcel Map No. 26771; and direct staff to prepare the appropriate resolutions for final consideration. .......... 09 ' January 28'2O03 Page PLANNING COMMISSION zone with a consistent underlying General Plan Land Use designation of Commercial/Off ice (maximum 1.0 F.A.R.) ."reject Address: 23425 Sunset Crossing Road (APN 8706-001-OO&� Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Property Owner: Diamond Bar Properties A454Wilshire Boulevard, SudeGO2 Beverly Hills, CA9U212 Applicant: Global Mission Church 3O32Hacienda Boulevard Hacienda Heights, CAB1745 Environmental Determination: This project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on that assessment, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impac'l Report No.2002-09 was prepared and is available for review at City of Diamond Bar Community and Development Services Department/Planning Division during regular business hours. Comments will be received until January 31, 2003. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission receive staff's report, open the public hearing, continue the public hearing to February 11, 2003, and direct staff to prepare a resolution approving the 7.2 Development Review No. 2002-25/Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2002-16/Tree Permit No. 2003-01 (pursuant to Code Sections 22.38, 22.48, 22.56, and 22.68) is a request to remodel and add approximately 6,446 square feet to an existing 3,392 square feet single family residence with a total of five -car garage, site retaining walls with a maximum exposed height of seven (7) feet, and swimming pool. Additionally, the applicant requests approval of a Minor Conditional Use Permit to allow for the continuation of a. legal nonconforming 22 feet front yard setback and Tree Permit for the removal and replacement of preserved/ protected trees. Project Address: 2601 Wagon Train Lane Diamond Bar, CA 91765 January 28, 2003 Page 4 PLANNING COMMISSION Property Owner: Kaoambir,Bhu|lan 814N. San Dimas Avenue San Dimas, CA 91733 Applicant: S&VVDevelopment 2O272CureyRoad Walnut, CA 91709 Environmental Determination: Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Section 15301(e). the City has determined that this project iaCategorically Exempt. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review No. 2002-25Vk8inor Conditional Use Permit No. 2002-18/To*e Permit No. 2083-01. Findings of Fao, and conditions of approval as listed within the draft resolution. 7.3 DevO ment Review No. 2002-35 (pursuant to Code Sections 22.48.020.A.,) is a request to construct a two story, single family residence of approximately 12,127 gross square feet including balconies, porch, patio porte cochere, attached four car garage, and a side yard retaining wall with maximum exposed height of six feet. Project Address: 3U78Windmill Drive (Lot 3ofTract No. 50314) Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Property Owner/ Windmill Estates, LLC Applicant: 348OTorrance Blvd. #3DO Toroanma, CA 90503 Environmental Determination: Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CE{JA). the Qty has determined that this project is consistent with the previously certified Environmental Impact Report No. 97-1 for Tract Map No. 50314. Further review is not required. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review No. 2002'35. Findings of Fact, and conditions ofapproval as |iahad within the draft resolution. 8. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS: January 28, 2003 Page 5 ISSION 9. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 9.1 L.A. COUNTRY HOUSEHOLD Saturday, February 1, 2003 ELECTRONIC WASTE Claremont City Yard, 215 Cornell Ave. 101LIUD UP: CITY COUNCIL MEETING: Tuesday, February 4, 2008 6:30 p.m. AQMD/Govt. Center Auditorium 21885E. Copley Drive ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW: Tuesday, February 11.2003—G:DOp.m. AQN1U/Govt.Center Auditorium 218U5ECopley Drive - Meeting will be adjourned due tothe Christmas Eve Holiday PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 11,2003-7:O0p.m. MEETING: AOMO/Gmvt.Center Auditorium 21865 E. Cop|eyOrive-yWe+tingvviUbo adjourned due tuthe Christmas Eve Holiday TRAFFIC AND Thursday,February 13.2DO3-7:00p.m. TRANSPORTATION AOK8[VGnvi.Center Hearing Board Room COMMISSION MEETING: 21865E.Copley Drive PRESIDENTS DAY Monday, February 17.2OO2 HOLIDAY: Due tothe Holiday, City Hall Offices will be closed - City Hall offices will reopen un Tuesday, February 18.2003 PARKS AND RECREATION Thursday, February 27.2003-7:80p.m. COMMISSION MEETING: AOk8D/6ovt.Center Hearing Board Room 21863E.Copley Drive G ` File onl!r.Z-!-rv0ond is ready f6P ening M[INUTES OF THE CITE' OF DIAMOND BAR DRAFT GULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMUMSSION DECEMBER 10, 2002 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Ruzicka called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in the South Coast Air Quality Management/Government Center Auditorium, 21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California . 91765. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Commissioner Nolan led the pledge of allegiance. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Chairman Joe Ruzicka; Vice Chairman Steve Tye; and Commissioners Steve Nelson; Dan Nolan; and Jack Tanaka. Also Present: James DeStefano, Deputy City Manager; Ann Lungu, Associate Planner; Linda Smith, Development Services Assistant; Debbie Gonzales, Administrative Assistant; and David Meyer and Milan Garrison, LDM Associates. 2. MATTERS FROM THE A IENCE/P LIC COMMENTS: None Offered. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: As presented. 4. CONSENT CALENDAR: 4.1 Minutes of Regular Meeting of November 26, 2002. Chair/Ruzicka asked that on page 5, his comment regarding VC/Tye reflect that the City would "approve a project, not "build" a project. C/Tanaka moved, C/Nolan seconded, to approve the Regular Meeting minutes of November 26, 2002, as amended. Without objection, the motion was so ordered. S. OLD BUSINESS: None. 6. NEW BUSINESS: None. 7.1 General Plan Amendment 2002-01, Zone C�002-01 StJeeitic Plan 2002-01� Develoament Ilevlew 2002®07, Conditional Use Per °t No. 2002-05, Tentative Parcel Mat► No. 26771, 'Tree Permit No. 2002®07 -the proposed project is a request for approval of a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Specific Plan, Development Review, Conditional Use Permit, Tentative Parcel Map and Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact. This would allow for the construction of a retail/commercial shopping center consisting of a three-story hotel, two freestanding restaurants, and two office/retail building pads totaling approximately 70,370 square feet of gross building area. The proposed development will be located on an approximate 6.50 gross acre site. (Continued from October 22, 2002) PROJECT ADDRESS: 850 Brea Canyon Road Diamond Bar, CA 91765 PROPERTY OWNER: Louis Marcellin 20326 Fuerte Drive Walnut, CA 91789 APPLICANT: Phil Williams Extended Stay America 2525 Cherry Avenue #310 Signal Hill, CA 90806 Milan Garrison presented staff's report. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission re -open the public hearing, receive testimony, close the public hearing and direct staff to prepare a resolution of approval, with conditions, as appropriate for consideration at the next regularly scheduled meeting. Allen Anz, developer and Alan Taylor, Extended Stay America, gave a presentation similar to the community meeting presentation that took place after the October 22, Planning Commission meeting. In response to public concerns, the developer showed how the hotel would actually mitigate freeway noise. Additionally, some of the neighbors suggested a six-foot cinder- block wall to replace the chain-link fence. CalTrans has approved a wall with gate for access to the drainage channel. The wall with landscaping would extend the entire boundary line. The plan includes modification of the tum signal to include a protected U-turn lane. The neighbors were concerned about possible infringement on their views. In response, the developer provided photos depicting potential after -construction views. Mr. Ariz explained that trash pickup would :R� DECEMBER t. 2002 Page 3 PLANNINGI ' FI I; 1 be scheduled for either 9:30 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. or 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. so that the neighbors would not be disturbed during early morning or evening hours. VC/Tye asked if the surrounding property owners were notified of tonight's meeting. DCM/DeStefano responded no because the process of notification is one time. If the project were continued, those in attendance would know of the continuance. In this case, the neighborhood meeting provided staff an opportunity to remind the audience that this matter was continued to tonight's meeting. VC/Tye had a feeling that because the sign was no longer posted at the site, the neighbors who were not satisfied with the November meeting felt it was a done deal. DCM/DeStefano said it is difficult to say why audience members appear or do not appear. At the October 22 Planning Commission meeting, the audience members were informed that this project had a number of different steps culminating with City Council review. Additionally, during the developer's neighborhood meeting, the audience was again told about tonight's continued meeting. Also, at the neighborhood meeting participants were told they would receive notice about the appurtenant City Council meeting. Chair/Ruzicka re -opened the public hearing. Rachel Posey, 20968 Northampton, said she did not have issues with the hotel. Her issues are with the retail and restaurant traffic. She again pointed out her concern about the spillage of light from the Farmer Boys Restaurant and whether the light posted on the signs for Extended Stay America and other businesses in the center would spill over into their back yard. Another issue of concern was for the traffic. She presented photographs to the Commission showing the current traffic backup at 5:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. She used drawings provided by the developer to explain how traffic would be backed up even more because of the increased traffic attempting to access Wendys and Mop. She also provided the Commission with pictures of other similar business in the area that showed excess traffic during peak hours. She suggested as a mitigation measure that the wall to the rear of the residences on Northampton bordering Brea Canyon Road be built higher to mitigate traffic noise and lighting. Chair/Ruzicka closed the public hearing. Deputy Skeels said that Brea Canyon Road is a fairly major arterial street. There is a lot of traffic in the area of Lycoming and Brea Canyon. During the past month he has spent a considerable amount of time in the area. Tonight is his first exposure to the proposed DECEMBER ell, 2002 Page 4 PLANNING y,4 ' tO project and concerns of the residents. There will be an increase in traffic. Anyone who drives a vehicle in Southern California has seen a general increase in traffic. This is a location that currently does not bring in a lot of traffic and that will bring in a lot of additional traffic when the project is completed due to the types of businesses and constant turnover of customers and employees. The area is adequately posted with respect to parking. Law enforcement cannot be in the area constantly to deal with illegal parking, etc. C/Nolan asked if the commercial vehicle traffic could be limited on Brea Canyon Road. Deputy Skeels explained that Brea Canyon Road is currently designated as a commercial truck route from the northern city limit south to Golden Springs Drive, right on Lemon Avenue and northbound on Lemon Avenue to the northern most city limits. The City of Walnut posted every street with a weight limit. However, Walnut does not have the commercial businesses and freeway accesses as does Diamond Ear. In addition, the proposed location is highly visible and freeway accessible. C/Nolan felt the biggest challenge for the proposed project was traffic circulation. C/Nelson asked how effective rolling enforcement actions have been. Deputy Skeels responded that when officers are present such enforcement has been very effective. It gets peoples attention for a very limited amount of time. As soon as people realize officers are no longer present they revert to their old habits. Rolling from one area to another just moves the problem and does not change overall long-term behavior. Deputy Skeels responded to C/Nelson that out-of-state drivers ignoring traffic laws is a valid concern. If drivers can be identified, California DMV has reciprocal agreement with all lower (48) states. If an out-of-state driver failed to cure his citation and returned to the state there would be a warrant for his arrest. C/Nelson asked if it was possible to appeal to driver's sensitivities to surrounding neighborhoods. Deputy Skeels felt that such education was a waste of time because there is a vast legal difference from state to state. With Industry East buildup the area will attract many more out-of-state commercial drivers. There is no Atlas or road map that identified restricted streets and he would not expect out-of-state truck drivers to know what streets to avoid. Further, some areas aggressively enforce all aspects of commercial traffic and most areas do not. Commercial enforcement is very expensive and most areas do not have a commercially dedicated enforcement program in place. L DECEMFBER 10, 2002 Page 5 PLANNING COMMSSION With the increase in truck and rail traffic in this area due to the Alameda Corridor program enforcement efforts may change. In his opinion, drivers will continue to do as they wish until they get caught. Chair/Ruzicka asked for a more detailed plan on the traffic pattern, the ingress/egress and median lanes from the developer. Could the north wall be increased in height to where it would address Ms. Posey's concern with respect to light shining into her back yard area? Will there be vegetation, trees and foliage to mitigate, to the extent possible noise, odors, illumination, etc. PC/Meyer pointed out that the traffic analysis was included in staff's report. The analysis was prepared by a professional traffic consultant and hired by the applicant. Further, the City's engineer reviewed the analysis. Missing from the drawing were the residential properties on the westerly side of Brea Canyon Road where Ms. Posey resides. Additionally, the street improvement plan could be folded into the development plan so that the Commission could see the location of the proposed business with respect to ingress/egress. The drive-through restaurant, for instance, is pushed backed substantially from the Brea Canyon Road right-of-way and there is adequate queuing proposed to handle the traffic without impacting the rest of the center and public right- of-way. In accordance with Chair/Ruzicka's request, the traffic improvement plan could be folded in with the graphic for the sight development plan. The wall on the westerly side of Brea Canyon Road could be considered for a sound wall instead of the current restraining wall that would increase the height of the wall. This and other walls adjacent to or surrounding the development could be conditions of approval that would have to be satisfied for granting conditional approval for this project. PC/Meyer asked the Commissioners if they believed the proposed project was an appropriate modification of the land use pattern of the City's General Plan. If yes, staff is seeking direction to prepare the necessary documents to forward a recommendation to the City Council for modification of the General Plan Land Use Map. Secondly, staff needs direction from the Commission regarding zoning of the property. Staff's recommendation is for a C-2 Zone with a Specific Plan Overlay. Rather than consider the current proposed project, staff would like to have the Commission step back and look at the broader land use issues. In fact, the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change has to be submitted to the City Council for their deliberations. C/Tanaka asked if all of the steps would need to be approved simultaneously. PC/Meyer explained that the Commission could make individual recommendations to the City Council. He encouraged the Commission to consider the appropriate �.� DECEMBER 10, 2002 Page 6 PLANNING COMWIISSION development package as the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and the Specific Plan and to deliberate and consider those three items as a package. VC/Tye asked what else the City could do with the property that would meet the goals of the General Plan as currently defined. 'Mould the three most recent approved Gateway Corporate Center projects be an approved use? DCM/DeStefano explained that currently, the property is classified for an office type of project. The property is zoned for industrial purposes, thus creating an inconsistency that needs to be remedied. Even if the current project were not proposed, staff would recommend that the property be changed to a retail -oriented configuration because staff believes it is the highest and best use for the future of the property. C/Nolan asked for other examples of light manufacturing. He felt that regardless of what the City does about the proposed project, the area must be addressed. His vision of the property is not light manufacturing, but perhaps office buildings. The reality is that the City has a General Plan in place that community members spent a lot of hours developing. One thing that should be considered is the revenue that would be generated by the businesses that are proposed for the area. Office buildings do not generate the type of revenue proposed by the Extended Stay America project. It is also likely that office buildings would not mitigate traffic concerns. His vision is that people who live on Northampton and other neighborhood streets would be able to walk to an area and enjoy a restaurant or purchase goods. The property owner could sell his business to someone who would comply with the current zoning. DCM/DeStefano explained that due to the inconsistency between the General Plan and zoning of the property, the property owner could not simply sell the property to an industrial developer. The inconsistency would have to be resolved. Therefore, the Commission would be in the decision stream for whatever occurs on that property in the future. The property's configuration presents certain restraints and is not necessarily an appropriate site for big boxes. It has a high value because it is adjacent to the freeway that prompts a higher yield than may be anticipated by an industrial type of use. It would not be an appropriate site for heavy manufacturing. C/Nolan reiterated his vision is to do the best possible for the site while attempting to mitigate as many of the concerns as possible. PC/Meyer said he agreed that office use would exacerbate the traffic problem. The proposed use would likely spread the traffic over a broader period of time. DECEMBER r 2002 Page 7 PLANNING VC/Tye asked if it would be possible to access the site from the freeway ramp so that traffic would not hit Brea Canyon Road. DCM/DeStefano explained that there is not sufficient room for that type of traffic movement. In addition, CalTrans has plans to add another road segment to the westbound SR 60. C/Nelson moved, C/Nolan seconded, to direct staff to prepare a Resolution recommending City Council approval for General Plan Amendment 2002-01. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Nelson, Nolan, Tanaka, VC/Tye, Chair/Ruzicka NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None VC/Tye moved, C/Nolan seconded, to direct staff to prepare a Resolution recommending City Council approval of Zone Change 2002-01 from M-1 DPBE to C-2 SP and Specific Plan 2002-01 to guarantee a comprehensive development and to advance the goals and objectives of the City's General Plan. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Nelson, Nolan, Tanaka, VC/Tye, Chair/Ruzicka NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None Al Anz responded to VC/Tye that Extended Stay America is required to own their parcel and would require a subdivision of the property. DCM/DeStefano explained that it is debatable whether subdivision is an appropriate tool for this property. A subdivision of this property or the request for such is within a property's and applicant's right. From staff's perspective, this property meets all of the requirements of the State's Subdivision Map Act as well as the City's Subdivision Ordinance. C/Nolan moved, VC/Tye seconded, to direct staff to prepare a Resolution recommending City Council approval of a subdivision map. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: DECEMIBER 10, 2002 Page 8 PLANNING COMNUSSION AYES: CO SSIONERS: Nelson, Nolan, Tanaka, VC/Tye, Chair/Ruzicka NOES: COMMISSIONER& None ABSENT: CO SSIONERS: None C/Nelson wanted a clear statement that overall, ambient noise levels would not increase in residential neighborhoods as a result of the project on a permanent basis. The traffic conundrum unfortunately comes down to something a mathematician in the 1800's called "the tragedy of the commons" a phenomenon whereby a common resource is used up and until its value to individuals begins to decline. He would like to hear more about the future Brea Canyon Road improvements and what they are intended to do to alleviate the traffic problem in the long-term. He believed that the Commission's direction in proceeding with the Zone Change and General Plan Amendment is to make overriding considerations on the traffic for the benefit of the economic development. He believed the wall was a great addition and did not believe the project would have gone forward without it. The trees should be evergreens and not deciduous. He felt that the light and glare study should include consideration for ambient light levels in neighborhoods surrounding the property. He wanted a point of reference included. Lastly, he would like to hear what action the Commission could take to ensure a full and complete recommendation to the Council regarding rolling enforcement of the traffic and parking issues. Chair/Ruzicka asked that Deputy Skeels be invited back to the appropriate meeting to continue with the discussion regarding this project. C/Nolan asked staff to follow up on the specific plan for queuing vehicles from the fast food restaurant to Brea Canyon Road. DCM/DeStefano requested clarification from the Planning Commission regarding their direction to continue the Tentative Parcel Map, Development Review, and Conditional Use Permit in order to provide staff time to respond to the development concerns. C/Ruzicka concurred. VC/Tye requested clarification as to whether the Conditional Use Permit need be postponed or could the Planning Commission take action for recommendation at this time. L DECEM13ER 10, 2002 Page 9 PLANNING COMMISSION DCM/DeStefano recommended that the Tentative Parcel Map, Conditional Use Permit and Development Review be brought back together to allow staff time to provide further information to address the Planning Comm'ission's concerns regarding the design construction component of the architectural review and the operational and management conditions which are often applied to a conditional use permit. L.DM recommended that the matter be brought back to the Planning Commnission on January 28, 2003, to allow staff and the developer time to respond to the Planning Commission's concerns. Mr. Anz felt that his team could provide the requested information to staff in time for the January 28, 2003, Planning Commission meeting. VC/Tye moved, C/Tanaka seconded, to continue Development Review 2002-07, Conditional Use Permit No. 2002-05, Tentative Parcel Map No. 26771, to January 28, 2003. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Nelson, Nolan, Tanaka, VC/Tye, Chair/Ruzicka NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None 7.2 Development Review No. 2002-03 - Pursuant to Code Sections 22.48.020.A. this project is a request to construct a two-story office building of approximately 25,000 square feet on a vacant lot within the Gateway Corporate Center. (Continued from November 26, 2002) PROJECT ADDRESS: 21671 E. Gateway Center Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 PROPERTY OWNER: Acbar Omar 222 N. Sunset Avenue West Covina, CA 91790 APPLICANT: Southwest Design 7201 Haven Avenue, Suite E-309 Alta Lorna, CA 91701 AssocP/Lungu presented staff's report. Staff recommends Planning Commission approval of Development Review No. 200203, Negative Declaration No. 2002-06, Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. VC/Tye said he was troubled with Condition (g) on page 4 of the draft resolution stated that the applicant would be required to correct traffic impacts and/or pay their "fair share." AssocP/Lungu explained that the study indicates there would be no impacts. Additionally, Mr. Sieke feels there would be no impacts but wants the opportunity to review the corrections before making a final determination. Alan Smith said he read staff's report and concurs with the conditions of approval. The applicant and owner understand that while there is fine-tuning, they do not anticipate problems or surprises with respect to traffic impacts. He assured VC/Tye that he is comfortable with the working of Condition (g) on page 4 of the draft resolution. Chair/Ruzicka re -opened the public hearing. There being no one who wished to speak on this item, Chair/Ruzicka closed the public hearing. C/Nolan moved, C/Tanaka seconded, to approve of Development Review No. 2002-03, Negative Declaration No. 2002-06, Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Nelson, Nolan, Tanaka, VC/Tye, Chair/Ruzicka NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 8.1 Develor) ent Review No. 2002-32 - Pursuant to Code Section 22.48.020 this project is a request to operate a restaurant within an existing 1,200 square feet retail shopping center suite. PROJECT ADDRESS: 333 Diamond Bar Boulevard Diamond Bar, CA 91765 APPLICANT: DBV Star LIC P.Q. Box 5156 Diamond Bar, CA 91765 DPC Productions Inc. 1949 Baltar Street Canoga Park, CA 91306 DSA/Smith presented staff's report. Staff recommends Planning Commission approval of Development Review No. 2002-32, Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. Timothy Chang, applicant, said he read staff's report and concurs with the conditions of approval. Chair/Ruzicka opened the public hearing. There being no one present who wished to speak on this matter, Chair/Ruzicka closed the public hearing. VC/Tye moved, C/Nelson seconded, to approve Development Review No. 2002-32, Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS NOES: COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS Nelson, Nolan, Tanaka, VC/Tye, Chair/Ruzicka None None 9. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS: C/Nolan noticed the cell site notice sign was still displayed at St. Denis Church and wondered if it should be removed. DCM/DeStefano responded affirmatively and said staff would telephone the Church to so advise them. DCM/DeStefano responded to VC/Tye that the property owner is responsible for posting and removing signage. Beyond that point, it is a matter of staff working with the Neighborhood Improvement staff and Planning staff to make certain signs are removed immediately following the Planning Commission meeting. Chair/Ruzicka expressed his condolences to Paul Wright on the loss of his father. DECEMBER 0 2002 PageCOMMISSION 10. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: DCM/DeStefano reported that there are no items pending for the January 14, 2003, meeting, and therefore, would not conduct a meeting due to an anticipated lack of quorum. If the Commissioners have any items they would like to discuss on January 14, they could be placed on that agenda. VC/Tye asked whether the two remaining computer stores had applied for a Conditional Use Permit. DCM/DeStefano responded that one of the stores has closed (Market World/Bob's Big Boy Shopping Center). ePC located in Diamond Bar Village was sent a final notice last week. DCM/DeStefano reported that earlier this evening during the Administrative Review, he looked at a house located at the end of Clear Creek in "The Country Estates." He continued the matter to January 14, in order to respond to residents' questions regarding a sewage problem resulting from the septic tank system. Staff is hearing more about the septic tank issues in "The Country Estates." Of the 800-900 homes, about 40 are on septic tanks near the offices of "The Country Estates." Staff may revisit a plan to create a sewer assessment district in that portion of "The Country Estates" to remedy this situation once and for all. At its last meeting, the City Council took two actions, one to approve a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the library to be located adjacent to the Community/Senior Center project now under construction. The Mitigated Negative Declaration was completed in order to help facilitate a Library Bond Act grant application to be filed at the beginning of next year. The City may or may not pursue construction of the library. However, the Negative Declaration needed to be done to meet some of the application package requirements. All project decisions relating to the Community/Senior Center are exempt from the City's Development Code, therefore, do not come to the Planning Commission for consideration. The second action taken by the City Council was to approve a Home Improvement Policy Program to assist low and moderate income families who live near properties that are dilapidated or require cosmetic improvements. As an example, in order to qualify for the program, a four -person household's income may not currently exceed $44,100. On December 17, the Council will consider funding the program with Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) monies. The Commissioners are invited to attend the City's holiday party tomorrow evening at the Diamond Bar Country Club. As presented in the agenda. DECEMLBER 109 2002 Page 13 PLANNING C® SSI®N There being no further business to come before the Planning Commission, Chairman Ruzicka adjourned the meeting at 9:23 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, James DeStefano Deputy City Manager Attest: Chairman Joe Ruzicka MIAMI IOU", MEET|NGDATE: January28.2003 TO- Chairman and Planning Commission FROM: James DeStefano, Deputy City Manager SUBJECT: General Plan Amendment 2002-01, Zone Change 2002-01, Specific Plan 2002-01, Development Review 2002-07, Conditional Use Permit 2002-05, Tentative Parcel Map No. 26771 and Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2002-07 The proposed project was continued from October 22.2002 toDecember 1O,2002.On December 10, 2002, the Planning Commission closed the public hearing for the General Plan Amendment 2802'01. Zone Change 2002-01 and Specific Plan 2002-01 and directed staff to prepare the appropriate resolutions. Additionally, on December 10. 2002. the Planning Commission continued the public hearing for the Development Review 2OU2-07.Conditional Use Permit 2OO2{5and Tentative Parcel Map No. 2G771 in order to discuss further the project components related to these entitlements. The requested discretionary approvals are required for the proposed construction of a retail/commercial shopping center consisting of e 116-000m three-story hotel, two freestanding rootaurantn, and two office/retail building pads totaling approximately 7O'37Ogross square feet ofbuilding area onanapproximate 6.5O-acresite. The development proposal also contains a 60 -foot high double-faced freestanding pylon sign (880 square feet of total sign face area), with advertisement space for all proposed tenants. FuUhermone, granting approval would permit the commercial condominium subdivision ofo0.5Ogross acre parcel into five parcels ranging insize from .72acres 0o 2.44 acres. During the initial public hearing on October 22, 2002, a number of issues were raised by residents of the area. After receiving public testimony and discussing many o/the concerns, the Planning Commission directed the applicant \oconduct apublic outreach meeting. Staff was directed to analyze "quality of life" issues and their potential effects onthe surrounding neighborhood. The issues included the following: = Increased noise |avelm' . ° /numu; ® Odors; Privacy; Light and glare; Aesthetics • Truck parking on Brea Canyon Road, Lycoming Street and other adjacent residential streets; Additionally, the Planning Commission directed staff to identify the perceived benefits to be derived from a commercial development at this location, and conversely the potential negative impacts. City staff is of the opinion that the requested land use and zone change to allow the intended development is an appropriate alternative and logical evolution of land use based on the established development pattern. The site size and configuration, direct access to a major arterial, and proximity to the freeway make it viable and suitable for this type of retail/commercial development. Furthermore, staff believes that a retail/commercial shopping center of this scale, intensity and diversity of uses will assist in advancing the goals of the General Plan by: • Achieving economic stability through development and increased employment opportunities; and • Augmenting the City's revenue base (project is estimated to generate approximately $230,000 in sales and transient occupancy taxes) to better support public services and facilities; and • Maximizing economic development potential of a underdeveloped freeway oriented property; and • Availability of goods and services for freeway, business or residential customers; and • Enhancing the City's image as a viable area for development; and • Encouraging new and expanded developments to locate in the City of Diamond Bar. Negative impacts could be seen as: • Added traffic to an existing burdened major arterial (Brea Canyon Road); • Increased noise; • Potential light and glare issues; • Issues of privacy; • Concerns regarding security; • Unsubstantiated impacts on neighboring residential property values. Also, during the October 22, 2002 public hearing, City staff was directed to provide a land use comparison chart enabling the Planning Commission to examine the probable uses under several zoning classifications (see attached Exhibit "A"). As written, the Specific Plan limits the permitted uses to those that are primarily retail sales tax producers. PC 1/28/03 Page 2 of 7 negative impact on the residential neighborhoods. Also, a "manufacturing or industrial" land use designation could severely increase noise, odors and produce additional unwanted truck traffic. The following is a summation of the applicant's community outreach meeting conducted on Thursday, November 21, 2002. Approximately 24 residents attended. Concerns Mitigation. Increased noise levels The proposed hotel location will act as a sound The now commercial development will increase the barrier buffering some of the noise currently existing noise level, thus negatively impacting the generated by the freeway. Additionally, the new quality of life of the neighboring residential landscaping along the perimeter of the site will aid properties. in reducing noise generated by the new Traffic impacts and congestion Any development on the site will have a negative The site has a single point of ingress and egress, impact on the adjacent roadways. However, after and any new development will create additional conferring with the City's Traffic Engineer, the traffic creating congestion problems on Brea proposed mitigation measures (i.e. deceleration Canyon Road and many other surrounding lanes, median island with dedicated turn pockets adjoining streets. and signal improvements, etc) will help to minimize the impacts, Also, based on the type of retail mix, there will be a diffusion of peak time trips impacting the adjacent roadways. A copy of the Traffic Study is attached. Safety A six-foot high fence is proposed around the site -or the affected residential property. Odors Odor diffusers will be applied to the venting system There is a potential of cooking smells from the of the restaurant tenants to limit the amount of food proposed restaur:antuses. odors. Privacy The building is proposed in a location that provides The guest rooms of the upper floor of the hotel may the greatest setback distance from the neighboring invade the privacy of the adjacent residential units. residential properties. Also, fencing and mature trees are proposed along the north property line to further buffer and screen the windows of the third floor rooms. PC 1/28/03 Page nmr Light and glare The light standards will be designed so that all light The development will create now light and glare will be directed down at a go- degree angle and/or that could spill onto the neighboring properties. affixed with shields to prevent the spill of light onto adjacent properties. Additionally, the photometric diagram indicates that the new light should not impact the adjacent residences. Also, signs will not be located on building wall facing the residential Aesthetics (View) The hotel has been located in the least obtrusive The proposed hotel will block the existing views location. However, when the Cal Trans freeway improvements are completed, the hotel will partially block this massive structure. Additionally, the design of the hotel coupled with the mature trees along the north and south sides of the site should present an aesthetically pleasing view. Truck parking on Brea Canyon Road, Lycoming The City has recently red curbed 100 lineal feet Street and other adjacent residential streets along the west side of Brea Canyon Road, and posted "no stopping" signs. The City also hold a meeting with the Sheriff's Department representatives and informed them of the illegal parking situation, which they are now monitoring. During the public hearing on December 10, 2002, the Planning Commission receivec. public testimony and directed the applicant to revise the submitted plans and providc the add itiorafiWoT-it atio-i: 1. Detailed landscape plan identifying the sizo, type, species and location of proposed trees (Evergreen species 1nbeuued. 2. Traffic Improvement Plan showing the existing and proposed improvements on Brea Canyon Road and LycnmingStreet. Also, hshould key oningress/egress ho the site. 3. Graphically show the stacking for the dhve4hmrestaurant and how itimpacts the on-site circulation pattern. 4. Colored noise and light chart with a legend (point ofreharenoe). 5. The site plan should show a six-foot high block wall adjacent to the Flood Control Channel. 8. Submit a sign plan showing the proposed freestanding sign and wall signs for the Subsequently, the Planning Commission directed staff to prepare resolutio recommending approval of the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Specific Pla Conditional Use Permit, Development Review, Tentative Parcel Map No. 26771, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact. I PC 1/28103 Page ^of 7 • 11MULliquill am [OR -14 LOU I Ebm"Apil UP'll 11410 0 PC 1/28/03 Page 5 of 7 • Detailed landscape plan (sheet 8 — conceptual landscape plan) identifying the size, type, species and location of proposed/existing trees to remain. At a minimum, it is imperative that the plans clearly show the size and location of the trees to remain along the Flood Control Channel and the proposed additions, • Traffic Improvement Plan (sheet 2) showing the existing and proposed improvements on Brea Canyon Road and Lycoming Street. Also, it should key on ingress/egress to the site as well as graphically identify the adjacent properties improvements (e.g. complete intersection of Lycoming and Brea Canyon Road, and neighboring properties across Brea Canyon Road, and Brea Canyon Road/State Route 60 freeway). The plan does not show the public sidewalk or identify the total right-of-way. It appears the plans are not scaled. These issues are germane to the Public Works review and approval. • Colored light chart (sheet 5) identifying the light intensity. The plan drops off at the area on Brea Canyon Road fronting the site and neighboring property, which was the source of the most intense reflections. • Plans (sheet 1A, 1B and 2) should clearly identify the new raised landscaped median, show a revised deceleration lane that is extended, redesigned "pork chop" at entrance to push exiting vehicles to make a right turn, actual striping plan to ensure movements work. This will assist in City staff ensuring the correct improvements and obtaining an accurate cost. • Identify the colors and materials proposed for all buildings (sheet 3, 4A -D) and provide a colors and materials board. Also, it appears as if the hotel has exposed air conditioning units on the windows, which should be internal. This will ensure adherence to the provisions established in the Specific Plan. • Submit a sign program showing all proposed signs for each building to ensure compatibility and compliance with the City Code. Review will not be valid unless the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Speci �Ilan and Tentative Parcel Map are approved by the City Council. PC 1/28/03 Page 6mr The final discretionary approval will allow for a commercial condominium subdivision. This will permit the division of the single parcel into five lots, allowing for independeW ownership and financing options. UNWIMMMM-13 1 . Draft Resolution for GPA, ZC and SP; 2. Land Use Comparison Chart (Exhibit "A"); 3. ESA Site Plan -Delineating adjacent property boundaries 4. Staff Report (dated October 22, 2002); 5. Draft Specific Plan; 6. Initial Study/Draft gated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact No. 2002-07; 7. Traffic Study (RK Engineering Group, Inc., May 31, 2002); 8. Letter of Operations; and 9. Site Plan, Floor Plan, Elevation Drawings, Photometric Plan, Tree As Built Survey/Report, Conceptual Landscape Plan, Conceptual Grading Plan, and Tentative Map No. 26771 ('Exhibit "B", dated January 28, 2003) PC 1/28/03 Page 7 of 7 MM 14 MY I INIM1111161MIN1118951 2. Notification of the public hearing for this project was provided in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and Inland Valley Dq[ly Bulletin newspapers on October 9, 2002. Public hearing notices were mailed to approximately 103 property owners of record within a 700 -foot radius of the project on October 8, 2002. Furthermore, the project site was posted with a required display board and public notices were posted in three public places on October 8, 2002. 3. The Community and Development Services Department has determined that the proposed General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and Specific Plan represents a consistent, logical, appropriate and rationale alternate land use designation and implementing zoning and specific plan tool that furthers the goals and objectives of the City Geteml Plivi. M 4. On October 22, 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing. At that time, the puk" hearing was continued to December 10, 2002 and continued again to January 28, 2003. On January 28, 2003, the public hearing was concluded on the Application. NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Pl• anni Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: I This Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the fa. set forth in the Recitals, Part I of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality A i (CEQA), Article 6, Sections 15070 and 15072, the City has determin, 0 that a mitigated Negative Declaration is required for this proje Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2002-07 was prepared. The revie period for the mitigated Negative Declaration began October 9, lt. and ended October 29, 2002. Furthermore, Negative Declaration N 2002-07 reflects the independent judgement of the City of Diamo Bar. it on the finding and conclusions set forth herein, this Planning Commission hereby finds and recommends as follows: (1) The existing approximate 6.50 acre site located on the east side of Brea Canyon Road south of Lycoming Street more particularly described as 850 Brea Canyon Road (APN 8719-013-010) shall have a General Plan Land Use designation of General Commercial (C) and be zoned C-2- SP (Community Commercial -Specific Plan Overlay). The Planning Commission shall: (1) Certify tothe adoption ofthis Resolution; and (2) Forthwith transmit acertified copy of this Resolution to the City Council forthwith. |. James OaSkefamu, Planning Commission Seoratary, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly in1noduuod, paomed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held onthe 20hday ofJanuary 2003'bythe following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT James DoStefano.Secretary 3 LAND USE Permit Requirement by District OP C-1 G2 C-3 I Proposed Specific Plan MANUFACTURING 6 PROCESSING Chemical product manufactudng CUP Electronics, appliance, and P equipment manufacturing Fabric product manufacturing P Food and bev a manufacturing P Furniture and fixtures manufacturing, P cabinet shops Glass product manufacturing P Handcraft industries P Laundries and dry cleaning plants CUP Lumber and wool product P manufacturing Metal products fabrication, P machine/welding shops Paper product manufacturing P Plastics and rubber product P manufacturing Pdnt ng and publishing P Recycling—Reverse vending P P P machines Recycling—Small collection facility P P P Research and development (R&D) P Small scale manufacturing P Warehousing, wholesaling and P distribution RECREATION, EDUCATION i3 PUBLIC ASSEMBLY USES Adult oriented businesses P Clubs, lodges, and private meeting P CUP CUP halls Community/cultural centers P CUP Cultural facilities, libraries and P P P P P museums Heakhlfitness fatilibes CUP CUP CUP Indoor amusemenbentertmnment CUP CUP CUP facilities Cvtd�r re xeaat o CUP Rdgious ply 01 worship CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP Schools—Public and private P P P Key: P Permitted Use (Zoning Clearance Ft2quiredtl CUP Conditional Use Permit Required MUP Minor Conditional Use Permit R utred Use Not Ailed LAND USE Permlit Raquiraffma by Didrkt OP C-9 C-2 G3 I Pre c Pian Schools—Specialized education and P P P P training Studios—Art, dance, music, CUP CUP CUP CUP photography, etc. Theaters, auditoriums, meeting CUP CUP CUP CUP halls RETAIL TRADE USES Alcoholic bovame sales, oft-site P P P P MUP Alcoholic beverage sales, off-site, in CUP CUP CUP conjunctirin with the see of malar fuel Alcoholic beverage sales, wh-site MUP MUP MUP MUP WCUP Art antique, celhr;tat>Ee, and gid P P P p sales Auto and vehicle s rental CUP Auto parts sales P P p Auto sales, indoor only P Bakery, retail P P P p Bars and night clubs CUP CUP CUP CUP Building material stores P Certified farmers market P Convenience stores P P P P p Drive-in and drive Ihn,gh sales CUP —cu P —cu P p Fueling stations, gasoline, diesel, P P P P P and electric only Furniture, furnishings, aa d P P p appliance stores General retail stores P P P Is Grocery stores P p p Mobile hone and recreational P vehicle sales Outdoo retail sales and activities p P Pet shops P P p P Plant nurseries and garden supply P P p stores Restaurants P P P P P Restaurants with outdoor dining MUP MUP MUP P Second hand stores P P Service stations P P p Shopping center CUP CUP CUP Warehouse retail stores CUP SERVICE USES Ambulance services P P P Automated teller machines (ATMs) P P P P p Banks and financial services P P P P p Bed and breakfast inns CUP CUP Key: P Permitted Use Zonin Cloarance Re uimd CUP Conditional Use P_.it Re wired MUP Minor Conditional Use Permit Required Use Not Allowad LAND USE RequiromM by District OP G9 C-2 G3 I Pea fic Ptah Business support services P P P P P Car wash CUP CUP CUP Child day care centers CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP Drive-in and drive-thmgh swim CUP CUP CUP P Equipment rental(construction CUP CUP CUP equipment, etc.) Hotels and motels P P P P Medical services–Clinics and labs CUP P P P P Medical services–Hospitals CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP Offices–Accessory to primary use P P P P —ii— Offices–Business and professional Offices–Business P P P P P Personal services CUP P P P P Personal servicers–Acupressure, CUP CUP CUP massage therapy, tattoo parlors Psychic readers CUP CUP Public safety facilities P P P P P Public utility facilities P P P P P P Rr services P service stations P P P P P Storage, outdoor P P Storage, indoor P P Vehicle services– P P P Maintenancelminor repair Vehicle services–Major repairibody CUP P work Veterinary clinics and animal CUP P hospitals TRANSPORTATION 8 COMMUNICATIONS USES Heliports CUP Parking facilnreslvehicle storage CUP CUP Radio and televism antennas and wireless telecommunications antenna facilities Transit stations and terminals P Utility lines P P P P P Vehicle and freight terminals CUP CUP Key. Il,• r 11+.j,i P Permitted Use(Zoning Clearance Required) CUP Conditional Use Permit Required MUP Minor Conditional Use Permit R� Use Not Allowed CNA i City of Diamond Bar PLANNING f a Staff Repal" REPORT DATE: October 15, 2002 MEETING DATE: October 22, 2002 CASE/FILE NUMBER: General Plan Amendment 2002-01, Zone Change 2002-01, Specific Plan 2002-01, Development Review 2002-07, Conditional Use Permit 2002-05, Tentative Parcel Map No. 26771, Tree Permit No. 2002-10 and Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2002-07. APPLICATION REQUEST: A request for approval of the following: 0 General Plan Amendment (Professional Office to General Commercial); 0 Zone Change (M -1 -DP- BE to C -2 -SP), Specific Plan (to guarantee a comprehensive development and advance the goals and objectives of the General Plan); 0 Subdivision (Parcel Map for Commercial Condominium Purposes); 0 Conditional Use Permit (development of a shopping center); 0 Development Review (location, design, site plan configuration and the overall affect of the proposed project); and 0 Tree Permit (removal and replacement of a protected tree species). The requested discretionary approvals are required for the proposed construction of a retail/commercial shopping center consisting of a 116 -room three- story hotel, two freestanding restaurants, and two office/retail building pads totaling to approximately 70,370 gross square feet of building area. PROJECT LOCATION: 850 Brea Canyon Road (APN 8719-013-010) PROPERTY OWNER: Louis Marcellin 20326 Fuerte Drive Walnut, CA 91789 APPLICANT: Phil Williams (Extended Stay America) 2525Cherry Avenue, #31O Signal Hill, CA 90806 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Approval of the requests would permit the applicant (Phil Williams for Extended Stay America) to develop the site as a retail/commercial shopping center consisting of a 116 - room three-story hotel, two freestanding nestaunmntm, and two office/retail building pada totaling approximately 70.370 square feet of gmaa building area. AdddionmUy, the development would contain a 0O4001high doub|o-�cod�ee�unding p�onsign '(88O sq. ft. of total sign hana ama), with advertisement space for all proposed tenants, Furthermore, granting approval would permit the commercial condominium subdivision of the single 0.50 gmae auro site into Uwa parcels ranging /n size from .72 unnao to 2.4 acres. The subject site currently has a Ganam| Plan land use designation of Pnzfemakuno| uff|o* and is zoned M -1 -DP -BE (Light Manufacturing, Development Plan -Billboard Exclusion). This zoning classification permits various light induothaVmanufacturing uses including research and deve|opment, and office -based industrial uses. The site is currently developed and operated aaarecreational vehicle (RV)storage park. The requested development is not permitted under the existing land use designation and implementing zoning classification. Howmvur, it is staff's opinion that the requested land use and zone change to allow the intended development is an appropriate alternative and logical evolution of land use based on the established development pattern consisting of a mixture of complimentary commercial and residential uuen Additionally, the site size and configuration, direct access to a major odoha| and - proximity to the freeway make it viable and suitable for this type of retail/commercial ~^mi~ development. Furthermore, staff believes that o retail/commercial shopping centerof this ooa|e, intensity and diversity of uses will ~ assist in advancing the goals the General Plan by: o Achieving economic stability through development and increased employment opportunities; and o Augmenting the City's revenue bane to better support public services and facilities; and o Maximizing economic development potential ofunderdeveloped properties; and o Enhancing the City's image esoviable area for development; and o Encouraging new and expanded developments to |ooet* in the City of Diamond Toensure that these aforementioned goals are achieved, staff is recommending the adoption of Specific Plan. The Specific Plan will provide regulatory controls that assure development projects attain the desired level of quality and coherent compatible community design. |1establishes development standards (e.g. amtbaoKm. |ondeoaping, sign chtaho, oubdiviaion, eio), design guidelines, and public improvement requirements. SEQUENCE OFENTITLEMENT PROCESSING: As previously atated, based on the proposed use and deuign, the proposed project requires approval ofthe following seven (7)discretionary applications: 1. General Plan Amendment - Amendment to the 8mnano| Plan Land Use Bement from Professional Office toGeneral Commercial; 2. Zone Change - Change of zone from M-1-DP-BE(Light Manufacturing - Development Plan -Billboard Exclusion) to C'2 (Community Commercial -Specific Plan); 3. 5pg2EgLf[@n - Adoption of o Specific Plan to ensure a comprehensive development and advance the goals and objectives ofthe General Plan, 4. Conditional Use Permit - Allow for the development ofaretail shopping center; 5. Development Review -Appmvothe |ooaUon, demign, site plan configuration and the overall effect ofthe proposed project. 8. - Permit afive lot commercial condominium; and 7 Tree Permit - Allow for the removal and replacement of a protected tree species. These required entitlements are being processed simultaneously to achieve a complete, comprehensive review ofthe proposed development. The Planning Commission is being requested tomake asequential recommendations and/or decisions on each application. The requests begin with: 1) Examining the broad- based policy choice ofamending the General Plan 10allow for commercial activities rather than off ice/professional uses; 2) If a majority of the Commissioners agree with the proposed emended land use dmmignotion, a subsequent decision can be made on the appropriate implementing zoning designation; 3)The Planning Commission is asked to examine the additional implementing tool ofadopting the submitted Specific Plan; and 4) The final four discretionary approvals related directly to the proposed project development. Conditional Use Permit Development Review Subdivision (Tentative Map) Tree Permit Amendment to the General Plan, approval of the Zone Change, adoption of the Specific Plan and approval of the Tentative Map is decided at a duly noticed public hearing before the City Council based in part upon a recommendation from the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission makes a recommendation to the City Council as whether to approve or deny the request. The City Council is the final decision-making body for these applications. Note: State law requires that the underlying General Plan land use designation and implementing zoning be consistent. Therefore, if the land use designation is changed, the zone shall be revised to reflect the amendment. The Planning Commission's decision on the Development Review, Conditional Use Permit, and Tree Permit will be final, unless appealed to the City Council. However, if approved by the Commission, the Development Review, Conditional Use Permit, and Tree Permit will not be valid unless the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Specific Plan and Tentative Map are approved by the City Council. ANALYSIS: The seven (7) entitlements are sequential in nature, and are discussed as follows: 1. General Plan Amendment - Amendment to the General Plan Land Use Element from Professional Office to General Commercial. The City's General Plan is a long-range planning document developed as a comprehensive growth -management and community development strategy. It defines citywide policies that will be achieved through subsequent community plans, ordinances, standards and guidelines, studies, capital improvements, economic development procedures and other pertinent programs. The adopted policies of the General Plan guide the physical development pattern and promote the necessity of adequate public services and facilities. The General Plan is the underlying controlling document. The preparation, adoption, implementation and maintenance of the General Plan aids in informing developers, citizens, decision -makers, other cities and counties of the rules that will guide development, and provide a basis for local government judgments. All land use decisions of the City of Diamond Bar should have a direct correlation to the established goals and policies of the General Plan. Thereby, all future land use decisions should be fair and impartial. Most importantly, the General Plan is to act as the constitution for development, the foundation upon which all land use decisions are based. The Land Use Element is to establish a pattern for compatible land uses to reflect existing conditions and to guide future development. By law, the element must set clear standards for the density of population and the intensity of development for each proposed land use category. The existing land use designation is Professional Office, which allows for a variety of general, professional, and administrative offices, and similar related compatible uses. The proposed land use designation is General Commancial, which provides for owide range ofretail shopping and services uses. Adjacent land use designations within the City of Diamond Bar are G*nwm| Commercial (C). Industrial (|) and Low Medium Residential (RLM) as shown on the City ufDiamond Bar land use map. Staff believes that the proposed amendment represents a |ogioa|, appropriate and rationale alternate land use designation. The Planning Commission should weigh all evidence and recommend approval or denial of the General Plan Amendment based on the goals and objectives of the community as summarized in the General Plan. The Planning Commission's recommendation will heforwarded to the City Council for a final decision. 2. Zone Change - Change of zona from M -1 -DP -BE (Light Manufacturing - Development Plan -Billboard Exclusion) to C-2 (Community Commercial -Specific Plan). FundumenteUy, in its original and primary oenae, zoning is simply the division of city into districts and the prescription and application of different regulations in each district. These zoning regulations are generally divided into two o|amaea: (1) those which regulate the height or bulk of buildings within certain designated districts — in other words, those regulations which have to do with structural and architectural design of the buildings, and (2) those which pnaoohbo the use to which buildings within certain designated districts may be put. The purposes of zoning is the attainment of unity in the construction and development of a city, along lines of reasonable regulations which tend Uopromote the health, safety and general welfare ofthe community. The existing zoning of the property is K8'1 -DP (Light Manufacturing, Development Plan - Billboard Exc|uoion), which is intended to permit various light industhaVmonufacturing uses including research and development, and office -based industrial uses. The request is to change the zone to C -2 -SP (Community Commemia|-Development P|an), which has been established to provide areas for the location and operation of a wide range of na1ai| shopping and service uses, It is staff's opinion that the C-2 zone is an appropriate implementing zone for the General Commercial land use designation. Hownver, other implementing zoning designations could be C-1 or C-3, each having various development intensities and permitted uses. The Planning Commission should weigh all evidence and recommend to the City Council mpp*mvm| or denial of the requested zone change based on the proposed amendment consistency with the General plan. The Planning Commission's recommendation will heforwarded to the City Council for a final decision. 3. Specific Plan - Adoption of a Specific Plan to ensure o comprehensive development and advance the goals and objectives ofthe General Plan. A Specific Plan is a regulatory tool that local governments use to implement the General Plan and guide development in a localized area. A Specific Plan is able to focus on the unique characteristics ofo specific area, bycustomizing the planning process and /end use regulations for that area. A Specific Plan provides for flexibility and encourages innovative use mfland resources and development ofovariety ofland use types. The use of a Specific Plan has been chosen to guide the development in this particular instance given the unique size, configuration, access and proximity of the site to the freeway. It is staff's belief that additional regulatory measures are warranted to safeguard future development opportunities and attain the desired level of quality and coherent compatible community design. Additionally, it is important to establish development standards (e.g., permitted uses, setbacks, landscaping, sign criteria, subdivision, etc.), design guidelines, and public improvement requirements that would facilitate the goals of the General Plan and augment the City's revenue base to better support public services and facilities. Additionally, the proposed Specific Plan uses will permit drive-through facilities without a Conditional Use Permit. The primary issues addressed in the proposed Specific Plan are: restricted uses, minimum site size, and special freeway -oriented freestanding sign criteria. The Specific Plan restricts the type of permitted uses to primarily retail sales tax producers. Also, it prohibits the subdividing of the lot, except for commercial condominiums. Lastly, a single 60 -foot high double-faced freestanding sign with a maximum 880 square feet of sign face area(includes both sign faces -440 square feet each) would be permitted on the site. The sign would be allowed to advertise any and all approved tenants on-site. goalsThe Planning Commission is to weigh all evidence and recommend approval of or denial of the proposed Specific Plan based on the determination that it promotes and advances the Commission's recommendation iO 4. Conditional Use Permit - Allow for the development of the site as a retail shopping center. The requested Conditional Use Permit (CUP) is contingent upon the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and Specific Plan. If the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and Specific Plan are successful, the proposed project requires approval of a CUP. Therefore, the CUP can only be approved and valid with the approval of the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and Specific Plan. In each of the City's zoning districts, uses are divided into two categories: permitted uses, and permitted uses subject to a conditional use permit. Permitted uses are those that have been categorized and determined to be compatible with each other when certain predetermined standards a nd conditions (i.e. parking, setbacks, lot coverage, landscaping, height requirements, etc.) have been met (also referred to as ministerial actions). On the other hand, uses permitted subject to a conditional use permit are those, which have a special impact or uniqueness such that their effect on the surrounding environment cannot be determined in advance of the use being proposed for a particular location (also known as an adjudicative actions). The approval or denial is at the discretion of the Planning Commission. Nevertheless, in both cases, all development must be designed to be compatible with existing and future land uses, and be reviewed through the City's Development Review process. The City's Development Code (Section 22.10.030, Table 2-6) permits the development of shopping centers in the C-2 zone, provided the City's Planning Commission first approves a CUP. The CUP in required to determine whether the proposed use should be permitted by weighing the public need for and the benefit to be derived from the use against the impact, which it may cause. Additionally, this discretionary approval process aims tomnnurethat the proposal iaconsistent with the City's General Plan land use policies and zoning standards; provide for quality site design. layout and architecture; and promote arational design transition with adjacent properties. As previously mentioned, the Community Development and Services Department and other City Departments and Divisions (ie. Planning, Building and Safety. and Public Works/Engineering) have reviewed the project through the City's Development Review pmooun. The development review pmcaoa enables the various City Departments and Divisions to check development proposals for conformity with the provisions established in the City's Municipal and Development Code. Additionally, the review process is to ensure that each development proposal is designed to be compatible with any existing structures on-site and/or the neighboring properties. In this way, the quality and economic health of our residential, commercial and industrial districts are maintained. Staff's primary concern in in regards tothe proposed hotel operation. It is intended for occupancies that extend beyond uevom| days. Chapter 3.16 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Cud* establishes provisions to collect a transient occupancy tax from the hotel operator for each room that is consecutively occupied up to 30 days. While staff is generally supportive of the use as providing a needed oemioo, and recognizes that the nature of the proposed business is to accommodate longer staye, we also seek assurances to prevent the hotel development from becoming e de -facto apartment building. This would result in a substantial loss in revenue for the City from the transient occupancy tax, and be contradictory 0zthe General Plan and proposed Specific Plan goals and objectives. It has the ability to diminish the intended retail/commercial land use framework. Therefom, staff necommendu, as a condition of approva|, that the transient occupancy tax will be required for each day a room is occupied in accordance with local and State law, All City Departments and Divisions have reviewed the proposal and based on the submitted deuign, recommended operating pmoeduma, and on- and off-site improvements to improve ingress and egmoo, staff is of the opinion that the following required findings (Section 22.58.040 — Conditional Use Permits of the DBOC) can be made inthe affirmative. 1. The proposed use is allowed within the subject zoning district with the approval of Conditional Use Permit and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Development Code and the Municipal Code; 2. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan; 3. The design, |ooabon, size and operating characteristics of the proposed use are 4. The s object s ite i s p hysically s uitable f or t he t ype a nd d ensity/intensity o f u se being proposed including access, provision of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and the absence of physical constraints; 5. Granting the Conditional Use Permit will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity and zoning district in which the property is located; and 6. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). PlanningThe Commission may appr rove with condition 14 UP 9-011Z LIJdIJ!;e,-d"O bPeCITIV-0-Jan by he ultyl'.7 5. Development Review ® Approve the location, design, site plan configuration and the overall effect of the proposed project. The purpose of Development Review is to establish consistency with the General Plan through the promotion of high aesthetic and functional standards to compliment and add to the economic, physical, and social character of the City. The process also ensures that new development and intensification of existing development yields a pleasant living, working, or shopping environment and attracts the interests of residents, workers, shoppers, and visitors as the result of consistent exemplary design. The following provides an overview of the proposed development as it relates to the Development Code and proposed Specific Plan standards, which are intended to minimize adverse effects on surrounding properties and the environment. Minimum Lot Area (For newly created 5 acres 6.50 Yes parcels) (Existing) F.A.R. 1.0 29% Yes Front yard setback 10' 20 Yes Side yard setback (each) 10' & 10' 11' & 65'+ Yes Rear setback 10' 400'+ Yes Building Height Limit 35' (maximum) 35' Yes (*) A comprehensive sign program will be required for the building wall, awning, and proposed monument signs to integrate the project's signs with the design of the structures to achieve a unified architectural statement. As illustrated in the above chart, the proposed project's development standards meet or exceed the minimum Development Code requirements as they relate to the proposed zoning classification and Specific Plan. The proposed contemporary architectural style will utilize a mixture of natural materials that will be compatible with surrounding development. As mentioned above, the landscaping exceeds the minimum requirement and will assist in buffering adjacent land uses. The proposed freestanding sign reflects the architectural style of the proposed development. However, staff did have some concerns regarding the ingress/egress to the proposed development. The project has a single entry point onto Brea Canyon Road, which has been designed to City standards to handle the anticipated traffic volumes. Therefore, it is staff's opinion that implementation of the proposed project will not result in traffic generation above that of planned system capacity. However, site and roadway improvements (Brea Canyon Road) are necessary to ensure adequate ingress/egress from the site onto Brea Canyon Road. A detailed Traffic Impact Analysis (RK Engineering Croup, Inc., May 31, 2002) has been prepared and reviewed by the City's Traffic Engineer. The following mitigation measures will be required as conditions of approval to ensure project -related traffic impacts are less than significant. Provide a deceleration lane into the project site for traffic heading north. Install a raised median on Brea Canyon Road with left turn pocket into the site for southbound traffic. Provide a dedicated left turn pocket and signal improvements at Lycoming Street a nd B rea C anyon Road to allow for signal controlled independent left turns and "U" -turns for north bound traffic. Install a "pork chop" island at the entrance to the site to force traffic north exiting the property. Post "Right Turn Only" signs at the drive exit. The exact location and size to be determined by the City's Engineer. Based on the site design and recommended conditions, staff is of the opinion that the following required findings to approve the Development Review can be made in the affirmative. Exceeds all minimum Landscaping and Open As required by Chapter requirements for Yes Space 22.24 (Landscaping) landscaping see Preliminay pj9nL_ Design City Design Guidelines Complies with City Yes design criteria Freeway-oriented 60 ' high max. 60' high 880 sq. ft. (total for Yes (*) Freeway Sign 880 sq. ft. max. double faced sign) Parking/Loading 285 minimum parking 294 spaces Yes 8 loading spaces (min) 8 loading spaces (*) A comprehensive sign program will be required for the building wall, awning, and proposed monument signs to integrate the project's signs with the design of the structures to achieve a unified architectural statement. As illustrated in the above chart, the proposed project's development standards meet or exceed the minimum Development Code requirements as they relate to the proposed zoning classification and Specific Plan. The proposed contemporary architectural style will utilize a mixture of natural materials that will be compatible with surrounding development. As mentioned above, the landscaping exceeds the minimum requirement and will assist in buffering adjacent land uses. The proposed freestanding sign reflects the architectural style of the proposed development. However, staff did have some concerns regarding the ingress/egress to the proposed development. The project has a single entry point onto Brea Canyon Road, which has been designed to City standards to handle the anticipated traffic volumes. Therefore, it is staff's opinion that implementation of the proposed project will not result in traffic generation above that of planned system capacity. However, site and roadway improvements (Brea Canyon Road) are necessary to ensure adequate ingress/egress from the site onto Brea Canyon Road. A detailed Traffic Impact Analysis (RK Engineering Croup, Inc., May 31, 2002) has been prepared and reviewed by the City's Traffic Engineer. The following mitigation measures will be required as conditions of approval to ensure project -related traffic impacts are less than significant. Provide a deceleration lane into the project site for traffic heading north. Install a raised median on Brea Canyon Road with left turn pocket into the site for southbound traffic. Provide a dedicated left turn pocket and signal improvements at Lycoming Street a nd B rea C anyon Road to allow for signal controlled independent left turns and "U" -turns for north bound traffic. Install a "pork chop" island at the entrance to the site to force traffic north exiting the property. Post "Right Turn Only" signs at the drive exit. The exact location and size to be determined by the City's Engineer. Based on the site design and recommended conditions, staff is of the opinion that the following required findings to approve the Development Review can be made in the affirmative. I . The design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, development standards of the applicable district, design guidelines, and architectural criteria for specialized area (e.g., theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards, or planned developments); 2. The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future development, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards; 3. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the characteristics of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain and enhance the h armonious o rderly a nd a ttractive d evelopment contemplated b y C hapter 22.48, the General Plan, City [design Guidelines, or any applicable specific plan; 4. The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public; as well as, its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, and color that will remain aesthetically appealing; 5. The proposed project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious (e.g., negative affect on property values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 6. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Planning Commission may approve, continue the Development Review re�*LaaLlf a,,Lvrov ��IM ..� W upon approval of the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and Specific PWMF by the City Council. _W 6. Subdivision (Tentative Map) - Approval of a five (5) lot commercial condominium. (Subdivision Map Act, Section 66426.(c): The land consists of a parcel or parcels of land having approved access to a public street or highway, which comprises part of a tract of land zoned for industrial or commercial development, and which has the approval of the governing body as to street alignments and widths.) The proposal indicates five (5) parcels, thus requiring approval of subdivision. Based on the submitted proposal, the proposed parcels are not self-sufficient in meeting the City's required independent accessibility to a public right-of-way (Parcels 3, 4 and 5 are landlocked). Therefore, the applicant is requesting approval of a commercial condominium subdivision, which will permit the division of land and allow for independent ownership and financing options. Commercial projects of this kind, which include common access, parking and on-site maneuvering requirements, are handled through recorded a reciprocal parking, access and maintenance agreement (REA), prior to final map approval. This agreement ensures that the project functions as comprehensive and cohesive development. Staff recommends that an REA be adopted and submitted to the City for review and approval. Additionally, The City's Engineer has reviewed the proposed map and recommends several conditions. It is staffs belief that the proposed subdivision is a reasonable division of land, and together with the proposed provisions for its design and improvement, is 10 consistent with the General Plan, the proposed Specific Plan and complies with the Subdivision Map Act. Therefona, o recommendation of approval to the City Council could bejustified. The Planning Commission is tomake mrecommendation for approval mrdenial uf the Map tothe City Council. The City Council will render the final decision. 7. Tree Permit - Allow for the removal and replacement ofoprotected tree species. As explained in Section 22.38.010-Tnae Pneoomobon and Protection of the Development Code, trees are an important natural maoume, contributing to the environment by replenishing oxygen and counteracting air pollution, controlling ommion, and providing wildlife habitat. The City's Qonano| Plan requires the preservation and maintenance ofcertain native trees. The inten|iatopudedandpreserve (hese tmenandvvhen removal is allowed as a result of new development to require their replacement. There are e number ofmature trees currently on-site. Howevor, u more thorough examination of the applicant's tnam as -built survey and a field investigation revealed that there are noprotected trees, as identified by the City ufDiamond Bar Development Code, to be removed. Several large Brazilian Peppana, Eucalyptus, Ash, Palm, Qeefwuod and Olive trees will be removed. But, these are not |io1ad as a protected species, However. Eucalyptus trees along the freeway right-of-way will be retained and Eucalyptus trees along Brea Canyon Road will be removed as necessary for widening the right-of-way. Nonethe|eso, the applicant proposes to n*p|aoo the removed trees with a significant number of24'inoh box trees. It is staff's opinion that the landscaping as proposed will help to soften and enrich the appearance of the project site as well aopmvideonoppmphetebuff*rbebxeenthe adjacent land uses. The Planning Division shall mvinvv and approve a detailed landscape plan prior to installation and the project's final inspection urCertificate of Occupancy. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take no action on this application request. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Article 6, Section 15070. the City has determined that a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact is required for this project. Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact No. 2002-07 has been prepared and is made part of this administrative record. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission open the public hearing, receive UaaUmony, douo the public hearing and consider all of the evidence presented in connection with the project proposal and direct staff to prepare noov|uUonm of approval it with uonddiona, as appropriate for consideration at the next regularly scheduled meeting, In particular, staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following actions in sequence: 1. Recommend to the City Council approval ofthe requested amendment tothe General Plan Land Use Bement from Professional Office to General Commercial; and 2. Recommend tothe City Council approval ofthe requested Change ofzone from M -1 -DP -BE (Light Man ufocturing-Development Plan -Billboard Exclusion) buC'2 (Community Commercial -Specific P|an): 3. Recommend to the City Council approval of the requested adoption of a Specific Plan to ensure a comprehensive development and advance the goals and objectives ofthe General Plan. 4. Approve the request for a Conditional Use Permit allowing for the development of the site aamcommercial/retail shopping center. 5. Approve the request for Development Review allowing for the construction of retail/commercial shopping center consisting ofa 1i8-momthree-story hute/ bwo freestanding restaurants, and twoffice/retailoffice/retail building pads —`-- Ung approximately 7O.370square feet ofgross building area, subject tothe; and G. Recommend to the City Council approval to permit o five lot commercial condominium. 7. Recommend to the City Council adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration. O. Direct staff to prepare the appropriate resolutions corresponding to each decided case based on the Commission's determined findinga, and prepare conditions of approval for the Conditional Use Permit, Development Review and Tentative Map, which can be considered by the Planning Commission at the next regularly scheduled meeting. Prepared by: LDMAssociates, Incorporated Planning Consultant im WHffiT#T11WRTjF4Wk 1 . Draft Specific Plan; 2. Initial Study/Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact No. 2002- 07; 3. Traffic Study (RK Engineering Group, Inc., May 31, 2002) 4. Applications; and 5. Site Plan, Floor Plan and Elevation Drawings (Exhibit "A", dated October 22, 2002) Ill California Environmental Quality Act City of Diamond Bar ��.������ ��1(Ad Community Development Services Department Planning Divisivni ,7 21825 E. Copley Drive Diamond Bar, California 91765 (909)396-5676 (909)861-3117 Fax www.CityofDiamondBar.com Project Title and File No.: General Plan Amendment 2002-01, Zone Change 2002-01, and Specific Plan 2002-01 - 850 Brea Canyon Road Related File No(s).: Development Review 2002-07, Conditional Use Permit 2002-05 Tentative Parcel Map No. 26771 and Tree Permit Submittal ]Date: September 26, 2002 Lead Agency: City of Diamond Bar Community and Development Services Department/Planning Division 21825 E. Copley Drive Diamond Bar. CA 91765 (909)860-2489 Project Contact: James DeStefano. Deputy City Manager Milan L. Garrison, Planning Consultant Project Sponsor: Phil Williams (Extended Stay America) 2525 Cherry Avenue, #310 Signal Hill, CA 90806 (562)981-5891 Project Location: The project site is located in southeast corner of Los Angeles County, at the intersection of Los Angeles, Orange, and San Bernardino Counties within the City of Diamond Bar. The City of Diamond Bar is situated at the eastern end of the East San Gabriel Valley, adjacent to both Routes 57 and 60, as showm in Figure 1. In particular, the project site is located on the cast side of Brea Canyon Road south of Lycoming Street as illustrated in Figure 2. Project Description: The proposed project consists of the construction of a retail/commercial shopping center comprising a three-story hotel, two freestanding restaurants, and two office/retail building pads totaling approximately 70,370 square feet of' gross building area. The proposed development will be located on an approximate 6.50 gross acre site. City o(Diamood Rar - Initial Study General Plan Arnendment 2002.01 - 850 Brea Canyon Road Page I of 35 Fi�nre 1—�2egional Location 1l�fa� — L z,o Claromonh; Rancho _ _ I fucamonga Ban QIM851 10 Pomona Ontario- ` J n r 1I I- / baP\enWalnu� `tom' ` lndusfry Whfterer Chino MAs La Habra -C.S' Brea I e �1 Fullerton �Yorba (mda f � ,� `i Figure 2 — Subject Site/CYeneral Vicinita IVIan P� ViG1�N1�TY �P City of Diamond Bar - Initial Study General Plan Amendment 2002-01 - 850 Brea Canyon Road Page 2 of 35 General.Plan Designation: Professional Office Zoning Designation: M -I PD BE (Light Manufacturing, Planned Development Overlay, Billboard Exclusion). Surrounding Zoning and Land Uses: The abutting propert-v to the north is zoned C-1 BE (Restricted Business, Billboard Exclusion) with a consistent land use designation of General Conmiercial, and developed with a drive-through restaurant (e.g. Farmer Boys). Additionally, the northerly properties across the Los Angeles County flood control channel have a Land Use designation of Low -Medium Residential with a consistent R-1 6,000 (Single - Family Residential) zoning. The properties are developed with detached single-family homes. Properties to the west are zoned C-1 PD (Restricted Business, Planned Development Overlay) and R-1 8,000 (Single Family Residential) with a consistent Land Use designation of General Commercial and Low -Medium Residential, respectively. The C-1 PD site is developed with a small commercial structure and the R-1 8.000 properties contain a wall enclosed single-family residential neighborhood. The Pomona Freeway (60) (westbound Brea Canyon Boulevard off -ramp) borders the site to the south. Immediate Adjacent Zoning and Land Uses: Zoning Land Use North C-1 (BE) & Fast Food Restaurant Los Angeles County Flood Control Channel South Cal Trans R.O.W. SR 60 Freeway Fast Cal Trans R.O.NV SR 60 Freeway West C-1 (PD) & Small Commercial Structures & R-1 (8.000) Single Family Residences Site Size (AC./ SQ. FT.): 6.50 acres/283,140 square feet Assessor's Parcel No(s): 8719-013-010 Other public agencies whose approval may be required (e.g. permits, financing approval, participation agreement) City of Diamond Bar — City Council City of Diamond Bar — Planning Commission City of Diamond Bar — Planning Division City of Diamond Bar—Public Works Department City of Diamond Bar — Building Department City of Diamond Bar -Initial Study General Plan Amendment 2002-01 - 850 Brea Canyon Road Page 3 of 35 The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Agriculture Resources ❑ Air Quality ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Cultural Resources ❑ Geology/Soils DETERMINATION: On the basis of this evaluation: ❑ Hazards & Hazardous Materials t❑ Hydrology/Water Quality t� Land Use/Planning ❑ Mineral Resources ❑ Noise ❑ Population /Housing ❑ Public Services ❑ Recreation Transportation/Traffic ❑ Utilities/Service Systems ❑ NPDES ❑ Mandatory Findings ❑ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant impact on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. 1 find that although the proposed project could have a significant impact on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT is required. ❑ 1 find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on an earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. M ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DF,CLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Prepared by: Milan L. Garris rr Consultant Department Representative: James DeStefano Reviewed by: GC « - 6 r -i® Date: September 26 2002 City of Diamond Bar - initial Study General Plan Amendment 2002.01 - 850 Brea Canyon Road Page 4 of 35 1311►�I1 F7�7►117i 19iCY s. Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potential Potentialh, Significant Leu Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact 1. AESTHETICS — Would the project: I a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ❑ ® ® X b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not ® ® ❑ limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within X a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or qualitv of the site and its surroundings? ❑ ❑ ❑ X d) Ci catc a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the ❑ ❑ ❑ X area? 11. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES -- In determining Whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant Environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California At Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Consmn ation as an optional model to use in Assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convcr Prime Farmland. Unique Farmland, or Farmland of -Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown Oil the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources ® ® ® X Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract:' ❑ ❑ ❑ X . I c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to El ® EJ X non-agricultural use? City of Diamond Bar - Initial Study General Plan Amendment 2002-01 - 850 Brea Canyon Road Page 5 of 35 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potential Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact Ill. AIR QUALITY —Where available, the significance Criteria established by the applicable air quality Management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? ❑ ❑ ® X h) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing of projected air quality violation? ❑ ❑ X ❑ c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal of state ambient air quality standard ❑ © X ❑ (including releasing emissions, which exceed quantitative Ids for ozone precursors)? Fit Expose sensitive receptot:s to substantial pollutant ❑ ❑ X ❑ concentrations'' I e) Create nhlecuonahle odors affecting a substantial number of ❑ ❑ X ❑ people'' F 1\ . BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES — Would the project: a) Has a substantial acherse effect, either directly or through habitat mndiflcations, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive or special status species in local or regional plans, ® ❑ ❑ X Policies . or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S Fish and Wildlife Service? h) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional ❑ ® ❑ X plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? City of Diamond Bar - Initial Study General Plan Amendment 2002-01 - 850 Brea Canyon Road Page 6 of 35 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potential Significant Potentially Less Than Significant No hnpact Significant Unless Impact Impact Mitigated W. BIOLOGICAL (cont.) c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act ❑ ❑ ® (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) X through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native ❑ ❑ ❑ X resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ❑ ❑ ordinance" F) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation ® ❑ ® Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved X local, regional or state habitat conservation plan'! V. CUT: LURAL RESOURCES — Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a ❑ ❑ ❑ x historical resource as defined in § 15064.59 h) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an ❑ ❑ Irl X archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? c) Directiv or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource ❑ ❑ ❑ X or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains. including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? ® ® ❑ X City of Diamond Bar - Initial Study General Plan Amendment 2002.01 - 850 Brea Canyon Road Page 7 of 35 VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS -- Would the proposal: Potential Potentially Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigated a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: it Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a knouai 11 fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special El X Publication 42. it) Strong seismic ground shaking? El El ® X iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? [� ® X C) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potenualk El ® ® X result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction Dr collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table IS-1-13of the Uniform Buildinc Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or E ❑ ❑ X property? e) Have soils incapahle of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are ❑ El ® X _ not available for the disposal of wastewater? V11. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS h1ATERIALS — Would the protect: I a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous ® ® ® X materials? b) Create a signifcant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions El p ❑ involving the release of hazardous materials into the envirorunent? X City or Diamond Bar - Initial Study General Plan Amendment 2002-01 - 850 Brea Canyon Road Page 8 of 35 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potential Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Uniess Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS cont. c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely ❑ hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section ❑i ❑ X 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where i a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public Elsuch airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? n For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in ❑ ❑ ❑ X the project area'! P) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergencv response plan or emergency evacuation plan'? ❑ ❑ ❑ X h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving %ildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized ureas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands° VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY — Would the project a) Violate anv water quality standards or waste discharge requirements" ❑ ® ® X b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local❑ Groundwater table level (e.g.. the production rate of pre-existing ® El X nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been -ranted)? City of Diamond Bar - Initial Study General Plan Amendment 2002-01 - 850 Brea Canyon Road Page 9 of 35 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potential Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact Vint. IMROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY (cont.) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or ❑ ❑ ❑ X river, in a [Wanner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or ❑ ® ® river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff X in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stotmwater drainage systems or ❑ ❑ X provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ❑ ❑ ❑ X P) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on ® a federal Flood Hazard Boundary of Flood Insurance rate Map or ® ® X other flood hazard delineation map' h) Place within a 100-vear flood hazard area structures, which ❑ ❑ ® would impede or redirect flood flows? X I 1) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death mvolvmg Flooding, including flooding as a result of the ® ® ❑ X failure of a levee or dam' ) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ❑ ❑ ❑ X IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING — Would the project a) Physically divide an established community? X City of Diamond Bar -Initial Study General Plan Amendment 2002-01 - 850 Brea Canyon Road Page 10 of 35 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potential Potentialiv Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING (cont.) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation i ❑ X of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? ❑ ❑ ❑ X X. MINERAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource El El ❑ X that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral ® ® ® X resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific j plan or other land use plan? XI. NOISE -- Would the project result: i a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of ® El X standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance. OF applicable standards of other agencies? i b) Exposure of persons to of generation of excessive groundbome 1 vibration or eroundhome noise levels? ® ® ❑ I c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? ❑ ❑ ❑ X d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise I levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the ❑ ® X ❑ project? i e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where ® ® X C] such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? City of Diamond Bar - Initial Study General Plan Amendment 2002-01 - 850 Brea Canyon Road Page I I of 35 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potential Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant Nn Impact Mitigated Impact Impact XI, ]NOISE (cont.) f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the expose people residing or working in the project area to © ® 0project oise levels?LATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: ubstantial population growth in an area, either directly r le, by proposing new homes and businesses) or ❑ ❑❑ X recy(for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? ❑ ® ❑ X c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? ❑ ❑ ❑ X XIIh PUBLIC SERVICES. a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered eovernmental Iacihues, need Cor new or physically altered goverrunental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts. in order to maintain acceptable ,service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for ane of the public scn ices Fire protection') ❑ ❑ ® X Police protection' ❑ ❑ ❑ X schools" ❑ ® X Parks'' ® I ® ❑ X Other public facilities? ❑ ❑ ❑ X City of Diamond Bar - Initial Study General Plan Amendment 2002-01 - 850 Brea Canyon Road Page 12 of 35 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Potential Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No ❑npact Mitigated Impact Impact XIV. RECREATION. a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that ❑ ® ® substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be X accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? ® ® ® X XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC — Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., ❑ X ❑ ❑ result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips. the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)" h) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency ❑ El ❑ X for designated roads or highways'' c) Resull m a Chanes in aur traffic patterns, including either an increase m traffic Ic%els of a chanee to location that results in 11 El 13 X substantial safety risks? I d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.e., I sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses ❑ ® ❑ X (e.g.. farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? I ❑ ❑ ❑ X f) Result in inadequate parking capacity'? ® © ❑ X g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts. ❑ ❑ ❑ X bicycle racks)" City of Diamond Bar- Initial Study General Plan Amendment 2002-01 - 850 Brea Canyon Road Page 13 of 35 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potential Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Impact Unless Significant No Mitigated Impact Impact XVI. ITIILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS — Would the proposal: a) Fxceed wastewater treatment requirements of the X applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewatetreamlentfacilities E or expansion of existing facilities, the ❑ ® X construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the ❑ ❑ ® X construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded ❑ ❑ ® entitlements needed" X C) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may scree the project that it has adequate capacity ❑ ❑ ® X to serve the project's protected demand in addition to the provider's existing comminnents? A Be sen ed by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? ❑ ❑ ❑ X I g) Comph with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? ❑ © ® X City of Diamond Bar - Initial Study General Plan Amendment 2002.01 - 850 Brea Canyon Road Page 14 of 35 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potential Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact VII. NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (STORMWATER). Would the proposal result in: a) Storm water system discharges from areas for materials storage, vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or equipment ❑ ® ❑ X maintenance (including washing), waste handling, hazardous materials handling or storage delivery or loading docks or other work areas? b) A significantly environmental harmful increase in the flow or ❑ ❑ ❑ x volume of storm water runofr c) A significantly environmental harmful increase in erosion of ❑ ❑ ❑ the project site or surrounding areas? d) Storm water discharges that would significantly impair the beneficial uses of receiving waters or areas that provide water ❑ ® ❑ x quality benefits (e.g. riparian corridors, wetlands, etc.)? e) Harm to the biological intcerity of drainage systems and water ❑ ❑ ❑ x bodies° KV711. 11[ANDATORI'FINDINGS OFSIGNIFICANCE — i a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment. substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels:' threaten to eliminate a plant or animal ❑ ❑ 13 x ommumty, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare 0r endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? City of Diamond Dar - Initial Study General Plan Amendment 2002-01 - 850 Brea Canyon Road Page 15 of 35 Issues (and Supporting Information Solaces): T Potential Potentially Significant LLss Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigated Impact Impact XV11I. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE (cont) b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects® ® ® X of other current projects, and the effects ofprobable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or El ® % indirectly City of Diamond Bar - Initial Study General Plan Amendment 2002-01 - 850 Brea Canyon Road Page 16 of 35 E,xnlanatio►► of Checklist Responses I. AESTHETICS: Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? No Impact. No scenic vistas are present in the proximate vicinity of the project site. Therefore, the mixture of one and three-story development will not be out of character with other structures or uses in the area and would not cause views from adjacent commercial or nearby residential areas to be obstnicted. The project will not result in any substantial aesthetic changes over existing conditions and thus no significant impacts would occur and no mitigation measures would be required. b) Substan iallY damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? No Impact. The General Plan Circulation Element does not identify any state scenic highways within the City. Furthermore, there are no significant trees, rock outcroppings, historic buildings or other significant scenic resources identified on the project site. Therefore, no scenic resources would be damaged by the implementation of the proposed project and no significant impacts would occur. No mitigation measures would therefore be required. c) Subsiantialh degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? No Impact. The project site is currently utilized as a recreational vehicle storage yard. Therefore, the proposed commercial development will not degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site. Future construction at the project site will be short-term in nature. Therefore, the visual character of the site and the surrounding area would not be significantly affected by the proposed project. In addition, the project site is located in an area characterized by similar sized commercial developments. The commercial development will be similar m scale and design with the surrounding area. No mitigation measures would therefore be required. d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect clay or nighttime views in the arca' No Impact. The proposed project would utilize the following light sources: exterior lighting, interior lighting, and security lighting. However, the type of lighting proposed will not be out of character with the uses m the munediate a rea, and will not adversely affect d ay or nighttime views in the area w ith r espect to light or glare. Lighting installations will be performed in conformance with the City of Diamond Bar Development Code: requirutg that all installed lighting be designed and located so that direct light rays shall be confined to the premises. Construction activities will be limited to normal work hours and workdays in accordance with City Public Works' and Building Department regulations. Therefore, no temporary lights will be required or anticipated for the construction activity. The use of temporary lighting would only occur in the case of an emergency and their use would cease upon rectifying the emergency situation. Therefore, the project would not create a new source of substantial light and glare that would result in any significant impacts and no mitigation measures would be required. D. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and fartriland. City of Diamond Bar - Initial Study General Plan Amendment 2002-01 - 950 Brea Canyon Road Page 17 of 35 Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? No Impact: The proposed project will not result in the conversion of existing agricultural land to urban uses. The project area is located in a developed commercial district and does not contain any agricultural resources a s d efined b y the S tate F armland M apping a nd Monitoring Program. Therefore, no impact on existing agricultural resources would result from the implementation of this proposed project. No mitigation measures would be required. h) Conflict with existing zoning far agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? No Impact. The proposed project site is currently zoned for light manufacturing uses with a proposed zone change to general commercial uses, which will have a consistent underlying land use designation. Therefore, the project would not conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract. Implementation of the proposed project would not require any mitigation measures. C! Involve other changes in the existing environment, which due to their location or nature, could result in co»rersion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? No Impact. The proposed project area has been developed with urban uses. Development of the proposed project would not require any changes to the existing environment, which would result in the conversion of farmland to no -agricultural uses. No significant impacts would occur as a result of the proposed project. No Mitigation measures would therefore be required. III. AIR QUALI'1'1' - Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following deternimations. Ifould the project: ,r, Co wrtli or ohsn'uct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? No Impact. Dust, both small diameter respirable matter (PM,a) and larger, heavier particulates, is normally the p rtmarc c oncem during new c onstntction. R ecause such emissions are not amenable to collection and discharge through a controlled source, thev are called "fugitive emissions." Particulate emission rates depend nn soil slit, soil moisture, wind speed, area disturbed, number of vehicles, depth of disturbance or excavation, cic. Fugrtive dust emissions are estimated at approximately 100 pounds per day per acre disturbed in the absence of any dust control measures being applied. Watering is generally assumed to reduce this rate by 50 percent, with reductions up to 80 percent possible through the use of chemical binders or other aggressive dust control measures. The SCAQMD estimates daily PM io emissions during construction to be 26.4 pounds per day per acre disturbed when standard dust control procedures required by SCAQMD Rule 403 are used. Current Rule 40_ requirements are more stringent than when the 26.4 pound per acre estimate was developed. Currently required enhanced dust controls procedures can substantially further reduce the average daily PMto emission rate. City of Diamond Bar - Initial Study General Plan Amendment 2002-01 - 850 Brea Canyon Road Page 18 of 35 The proposed project will be constructed in a period of approximately 12-18 months. The estimated amount of PMn, that the area would be subject to for this activity would be approximately 171.60 pounds per day during this 12-18 month period. All indicated amounts of PM,, would be further reduced because construction activity would be scaled back or stopped during period of high winds. Constant monitoring of the construction activity by the City of Diamond Bar will insure compliance with the AQMP requirements. The applicable air quality management plan for the project area is the 1997 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) prepared by South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). CEQA requires that projects be consistent with the AQMP. A consistency determination plays an essential role in local agency project review by linking local planning and unique individual projects to the AQMP in the following ways: 1) It fulfills the CEQA goal of fully inforung local agency decision -makers of the environmental costs of the project trader consideration at a stage early enough to ensure that air quality concerns are fully addressed; and 2) it provides the local agency with ongoing information assuring local decision -makers that they are making real contributions to clean air goals contained in the AQMP. The AQMP provides standards of concentration for seven (7) air pollutants: ozone, carbon dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, suspended particulate matter, sulfates, lead, as well as visibility -reducing particles. Only new or amended General Plan elements, Specific Plans, and significant projects need to undergo a consistency review. This is because the AQMP strategy is based on projections from local General Plans. The project is consistent with the General Plan in that there will be no net increase in planned commercial designated land. The project will not generate any stationary source emissions addressed by the AQMP, and the project will meet t he S CAQMD Rule 4 03 s tandard d ust c ontrol p rocedures, therefore no mitigation measures would therefore be required. hl Violate airy air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation Less Than Significant Impact. Construction of the proposed project will require grading. The grading activities will result in the generation of dust. The greatest potential for fugitive dust generation is during rough grading, and from hauling the excavated soils out of the project area to a fill site. In addition to fu!1tnvc dust emissions, equipment exhaust will be released into the atmosphere during the excavation activilies Workers commuting to and from the construction site will generate some mobile -source emmsstons. T hest s hors -term c onstruction-related impacts, although not considered significant, may be a tnusance to adjacent and nearby urban land uses. The construction period for the proposed project is approximately 12-18 months. 12-18 months of construction, based on the size of the proposal, would produce minimal emissions, which would be significantly less than the established threshold. Additionally, grading activities would be stopped during periods of high winds. Standard construction practices include the use of watering and other methods of controlling fugitive emissions. Construction equipment will be monitored to insure proper maintenance. When construction is completed, no air quality impacts are anticipated. ct Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable fderal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions, which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors) 2 Less Than Significant Impact. Refer to Response III b above. dl Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pullutunl concentrations' Less Than Significant Impact. National Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAQS) were originally established in 1971 for six pollution species with states retaining the option to add other pollutants, require City of Diamond Bar - Initial Study General Plan Amendment 2002-01 - 850 Brea Canyon Road Page 19 of 35 more stringent compliance, or to include different exposure periods. These standards are the levels of air quality considered safe, with an adequate margin of safety, to protect the public health and welfare. They are designed to protect those people most susceptible to farther respiratory distress such as asthmatics, the elderly, very young children, people already weakened by other disease or illness, and persons engaged in strenuous work or exercise, called "sensitive receptors." Healthy adults can tolerate occasional exposure to air pollutant concentrations considerably above these minimum standards before adverse effects are observed. Construction activity may result in the generation of fugitive dust and emissions from commuter vehicles and construction equipment during the 12-18 month construction period. Although these emissions may be considered a nuisance to adjoining land uses, they are considered to be minimal given the scope of proposed development, and would be significantly less than the established threshold. Additionally, they will only be present during the short grading phase of this construction project. A survey of the project area did not reveal the location of any land uses that would be considered sensitive receptors. Therefore, the proposed project will not have an impact on sensitive receptors and no mitigation is therefore required. e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Less than Significant Impact, During allowable construction work -hours, various types of construction equipment necessary to undertake grading and construction of the commercial improvements will be used. Most of the construction equipment will be diesel powered. The emissions from this equipment will cause a diesel odor that may be noticeable during normal working hours within the immediate construction site. This may create objectionable odors and emissions during the short-term construction period. Any perceptible impacts from construction equipment exhaust will be confined to occasional whiffs of characteristic diesel exhaust odor, but such odors will not be in sufficient concentrations to expose any nearby individuals or uses of land to air pollution levels above acceptable standards. The area most impacted b y c onstruction o dor e missions is a radius of 50 to 100 feet from the source. Residential uses located in close proximity to the sites' northerly boundary across the Los Angeles County Flood Control Channel would he most directly affected. Construction equipment odors, which are not considered to be significant, will cease after completion of construction. No mitigation measures are necessary. IN BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project: (a) Harr substantial adverse effects, either directly or through habitat modifications, ort any species identified a.s a candidare, ,sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies or regulations or by the Calrlornur Department of Fish and Game or the U.S. Fish and Ifildlife Service? No Impact. The project site is located in an urban. developed area and does not contain any significant biological resources. The project site does not provide habitat for any candidate, sensitive, or special status species. Animal species located on the protect site are likely limited to rodents and a variety of bird species that are able to adapt to life in urban environment. Development of the proposed project would not create anv significant impacts to special status biological resources. No mitigation measures are necessary. ht HaVe a substantial adverse effect on ant, riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? .No Impact. As described above, the project site does not contain any significant habitat resources. Development of the project site would not have a significant impact on riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities identified in local, regional, or national plans, regulations or policies. No riparian habitat of sensitive natural communities are located within the project site. No significant impacts would result from project implementation. No irutigation measures are necessary. City of Diamond Bar - Initial Study General Plan Amendment 2002-01 - 850 Brea Canyon Road Page 20 of 35 C) Have a substantial adverse effect ort federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, felling, hydrological interruption, or other means? No Impact. The proposed project is located in an urban area developed with a mixture of commercial, industrial and residential uses and does not contain any wetland resources. No wetlands would be impacted by development of the proposed project. No mitigation measures are necessary. d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or rnigratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites' No Impact. The project site is not considered a migratory wildlife corridor due to the existing surrounding urban development. Moreover, there is no connection to any natural wildlife area. Therefore no substantial impacts will occur as a result of project implementation. No mitigation measures would therefore be required, e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policv or ordinance? Less Than Significant Impact. Approval of this project will result in the removal of a number of mature California Pepper, Brazilian Pepper, Olive and Beefwood trees. The City's General Plan and implementing Development Ordinance requires the pro tectiorvpreservation and maintenance of native trees, which includes California Peppers. However, when the preservation of a protected tree is not feasible and would compromise the property's owner's reasonable use and enjoyment of property or surrounding land it may be removed provided it is replaced in accordance with the City's adopted standards. Replacement trees must be planted at a minimum 3:1 ratio on lots greater than 20,000 square feet with a minimum box size of 24 inches. The Planning Commission may approve smaller container sizes. Acceptance of the tree removal/replacement will require discretionary approval in order to be consistent with the policies and requirements of the zone. No mitigation measures would therefore be required. li Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plam w other approved local, regional or state habitat conservation plan? No Impact. No adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved habitat conservation plan exists at the site. Therefore, no mitigation measures are required. CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the project: nr Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance ofa historical resource as defined in x'15064.5? No Impact. No structures are currently on site and no structures have ever been found onthesubject property. Additionally, no important persons or events are associated with the project site and no historical resources are located on the property. Therefore, no significant impacts would result from implementation. No mitigation measures are required. b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.S? No Impact. No archeological resources have been identified on or near the project site and it is unlikely that any would be uncovered during the construction of the project. However, while no significant archeological resources is expected to be impacted by project development, in the event that suspected City of Diamond Bar - Initial Study General Plan Amendment 2002-01 - 850 Brea Canyon Road Page 21 of 35 archeological resources are uncovered, all work shall be stopped in the vicinity of the find utttil a certified archeologist can conduct an evaluation. This will assure any potential archeological impacts are not significant. No mitigation measures are required. c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? No Impact. No paleontological resources have been identified on or near the project site and it is unlikely that any would be uncovered during construction of the project. However, while no significant paleontological resources is expected to be impacted by the proposed project, in the event that suspected paleontological resources are uncovered, all work shall be stopped in the vicinity of the find until a certified paleontologist can conduct an evaluation. This will assure any potential paleontological impacts are not significant No mitigation measures are required. dl Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside offorrnal cemeteries? No Impact. There are no known human remains within the project site or vicinity. Therefore, it is unlikely that the project would disturb any human remains. No mitigation measures would be required. Vl. GEOLOGY ANI) SOILS: Would the proposal: a) Expose people or structure to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? No Impact. Section IV/Figure IV -I of the 1995 General Plan Public Health and Safety Element identifies four (4) potentially active faults (e.g. Whittier, San Jose, Sierra Madre, and San Gabriel) which have a potential for causing local damage. The closest known active faults are located more than ten (10) miles from the City, with the greatest fault zone (San Andreas) located more than 26 miles northeast of the City. Additionally, no active fault traces are known to cross the project site. As a result.. fault rupture within the City or near the project site is unlikely. Therefore, no mitigation measures would be required. iil Strong seismic ground slaking:' No impact. Section IV/Figure TV -1 of the 1995 General Plan Public Health and Safety Element identifies four (4) potentially active faults (e.g. Whittier, San Jose, Sierra Madre, and San Gabriel) which have a potential for causing local damage. The closest known active faults are located more than ten (10) miles from the City, Mth the greatest fault zone (San Andreas) located more than 26 miles northeast of the City. The primary dangers associated with seismic activity are surface rupture, ground failure, liquefaction, and ground shaking. The proximity of the site to the active faults will result in ground shaking during moderate to severe seismic events. City building regulations provide specific construction techniques required for the seismic zone in which the project is located. Design and construction shall adhere to the prescribed minimum requirements to address seismic safety issues. Therefore, no mitigation measures would be required. City of Diamond Bar- Initial Study General Plan Amendment 2002-01 - 850 Hrea Canyon Road Page 22 of 35 iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? No I mpact. L iquefaction refers to loose, saturated sand or gravel deposits that lose their load supporting capability when subjected to intense shaking. Liquetaction potential varies based upon on-site soil composition and groundwater depth. The California Department of Conservation is mandated by the Seismic Hazards Act of 1990 to identify and map the state's most prominent earthquake hazards, including areas where earthquakes are likely to cause shaking, liquefaction of other ground failure. The California Department of Conservation Division of Mines and Geology has recently updated existing seismic hazard maps for portions of southern California, including the area covering the potential project site. The State Geologist released the official maps March 25, 1999. The updated map that covers the project area indicates that the project site is not located in a liquefaction zone. No significant impacts would result from the development of the proposed project. No mitigation measures are necessary. iv). Landslides? No Impact. Land sliding is a type of erosion in which masses of earth and rock move down slope as a single unit. Susceptibility of slopes t o I andslides a nd o ther foams o f s lope failure depend on several factors. These are usually present in combination and include, but are not limited to, steep slopes, condition of rock and soil materials, presence of water, formational contracts, geologic shear zones and seismic activity. The area for the proposed commercial improvements is relatively flat. The probability that this area is subject to landslides is remote at best. The chance of landslide and/or mudslide is not considered to be an impact. Therefore, no mitigation measures would be required. bt Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? No Impact. The project would not result in any uses that cause substantial soil erosion. Once grading and compaction of the project area are completed, the project site will be paved and landscaped. Therefore, soil erosion would be minimal and temporary in nature. Since the site has not been used for agricultural production, the loss of topsoil would not be considered significant. In addition, compliance with the General Construction Activities Stoml Water Permit and development of Best Management Practices (further discussed below under Section VIII (a), Hydrology and Water Quality) will ensure that no substantial erosion occurs during construction. Therefore, no mitigation measures would be required. cl Hr located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the protect, and potentially result in on- or offsite landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse.' No Impact. Compliance v.9th the General Constivetion Activities Storm Water Permit and development of and adherence to Best Management Practices will ensure that no substantial erosion will occur during grading and compaction of the site. Therefore, no mitigation measures would be required. d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1997), creating substantial risks to life or property.1 No Impact. Expansive soils are not generally found in this area of the City of Diamond Bar. However, if expansive soil is identified during grading, the soil will not be used for compaction purposes. This City of Diamond Bar - Initial Studv General Plan Amendment 2002-01 - 850 Brea Canyon Road Page 23 of 35 construction technique or method is standard practice for the preparation of building sites. No constnaction alternatives need to be considered. Therefore, no mitigation measures would be required. e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater.? No Impact. The proposed project will be connected to the local sewer, but will not result in any significant impact on the local public sewer system. Therefore, no alternative wastewater disposal systems (i.e., septic tanks) will be required. No mitigation measures are required. VII. HAZARDS ANIS HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Would the project: (7) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal Of hazardous materials? No Impact. The proposed commercial development would not use or maintain any significant quantities of hazardous materials in its operation. All hazardous materials, e.g., janitorial chemicals and fertilizers, used on site would be stored and handled in accordance with State and federal requirements. The proposed project would not involve the routine transport, use or disposal of any significant quantities of hazardous materials. No significant impacts to the public or the environment would result from the proposed project. No mitigation measures are required. b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? No Impact. Refer to Response VII a), above. C) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-qucn-ter mile of an existing or proposed school? No Impact. There are no schools located within one-quarter mile ofthe project site, and no hazardous emissions will be associated with the proposed project. Therefore, no mitigation measures would be required. fill Br located nn a site ii'hich is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Gm'crnrncrrt Code section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the c'nt'rronntent', No Impact. The project site is not listed as a hazardous materials site compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, project implementation would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. Therefore, no mitigation measures would be required. C) Fnr a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within tirn miles of public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a .safety hazard for people residing or tra king in the project area" No Impact. The proposed commercial development is not located in the vicinity of an airport safety zone and would not impact airport operations The project would not result in safety hazards to people residing or working in the project area. No significant impacts would result from the proposed project. Therefore, no mitigation measures would be required. City of Diamond Bar - Initial Study General Plan Amendment 2002-01 - 850 Brea Canyon Road Page 24 of 35 J) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? No Impact. The project site is not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip. Therefore, no mitigation measures would be required. g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? No Impact. The proposed project would not involve any uses that would interfere with the City's Emergency Operations Plan or with major emergency evacuation routes out of the area. Therefore, no mitigation measures would be required. h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands7 No Impact. The project site is not in a fire hazard area as depicted in the City's Public Health and Safety Element of the General Plan. Therefore, no mitigation measures would be required. VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: Would the project: (1) Violate arm• water quality standards at- waste discharge requirements? No Impact. In 1972, the F ederal Water P ollution Control Act (also referred to as the Clean Water Act [CWA]) was amended to provide that the discharge of pollutants to waters of the United States from any point source is unlawful unless the discharge is in compliance with a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The 1987 amendments to the CWA added Section 402(p), which establishes a framework for regulating municipal and industrial storm water discharges under the NPDES Procram. On November 16, 1990, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) published final regulations that establish storm water pemut application requirements for specified categories of industries. The regulations provide that discharges of storm water to waters of the United States from construction pio)ects that encompass five or more acres of soil disturbance are effectively prohibited unless the discharge is in compliance with an NPDES permit. The proposed project would be subject to the NPDES program, because the project involves a construction site greater than five acres. However, as part of the approval process and prior to permit issuance, the NPDES requirements would need to be satisfied (permit) so as not to violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. No significant impacts would result from this project. No mitigation measures are necessary. ht Suhnmrtialh deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that N)ore wntuld be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing neanc, wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land rices or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? No Impact. The proposed commercial development will not significantly change ground water recharge conditions. Currently, recharge is extremely linuted due to runoff rates and soils conditions. Current overland flows across the pervious sections of the site do not typically infiltrate to a depth where an effect on ground water storage is realized. The proposed project will not contribute to withdrawals from an existing ground water supply. Therefore, no significant impacts would occur and no mitigation measures would be required. City of Diamond Bar - Initial Study General Plan Amendment 2002-01 - 850 Brea Canyon Road Page 25 of 35 c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner site? which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off - No Impact. The project site has been previously developed for use and therefore, no changes to the site's drainage pattern would occur upon implementation of the proposed project. Moreover, the drainage pattern will follow the natural contour of the land as it exists. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of project development. No mitigation measures are necessary. d) Substantially aper the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course 01'(7 stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site No Impact. The proposed project would not require alterations to the existing drainage pattern of the site. Project development would result in a slight increase in the amount of impervious surfaces contained on the site through the addition of surface pavement and placement of building structures, thereby, reducing the site's current rate of absorption and increasing the volume of surface water runoff experienced at the site. However, due to the small size of the site and.its current developed status, impacts are not anticipated to be significant. No mitigation measures are necessary. e) Geate or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? No impact. Development of proposed project would result in the conversion of permeable to impermeable surface through the placement of building structures on site and the placement of asphalt and concrete pavement, thereby increasing the volume of stormwater runoff currently experienced at the site. However, runoff generated from the site would be minimal due to the small size of the site and is not expected to contain any significant quantities of pollutants. No significant impacts would occur as a result of the proposed project. No mitigation measures are necessary. /) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? No Impact. Compliance with City perm t requirements will ensure that there will be no violation of water nuaht} or waste discharge requirements. Therefore, no significant impacts would occur and no mitigation measures would be required. gl Place hoasmg within a 100-vear flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? No Impact. The local Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) indicate that the subject development area is outside of the 100 -year and 500 -year floodplain. Therefore, no significant impacts would occur and no mitigation measures would be required. lr) Placa within a 100-vea .flood hazard area structures, which would impede or redirectflood flows? No Impact. According to the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map for the project area, the proposed development area is outside the designated 100 -year flood zone. Therefore, no significant impacts would occur and no mitigation measures would be required. City of Diamond Bar - Initial Study General Plan Amendment 2002.01 - 850 Brea Canyon Road Page 26 of 35 Expose people or structure to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the.failure of a levee or darn? No Impact. The proposed project site is not located within a flood hazard zone as identified by the City of Diamond Bar Public Health and Satetv Element as identified by the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) prepared by FEMA. Therefore, no significant impacts would occur and no mitigation measures would be required. J) Inundation br, seiche, tsunami, or rnudflorr.' No Impact. The project area is located inland of the coast approximately thirty miles east of the Pacific Ocean and is not adjacent to any large bodies of water. Therefore, the site is not subject to seiche, and/or tsunami. The site has stable soils and is considered suitable for development from a soils engineering and geologic point of view. Therefore, no significant impacts would occur and no mitigation measures would be required. I\. LAND USE AND PLANNING: Would the project: (7) Physically divide an established contmunih,? No Impact. The proposed commercial development would b e a c ontinuance o f t lie e xisting s turounding mixture of commercial and residential uses and therefore, would not divide an established community. Therefore, no significant impacts would occur and no mitigation measures would be required. b) Conflict with arty applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan; specific plan, local c oastal p rograni, or zoning ordrnance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Potentiallv Significant Unless Mitigated. The proposed project site is currently has a land use designation ofProfessnonal Office, and is zoned M-1 PD BE(Light Manufacturing, Planned Development Overlay, Billboard Exclusion). The project will require legislative and discretionary approval in order to allow for the commercial development and be consistent with the policies and requirements of the proposed zone. Mitigation Measures 1. Obtain approval of an amendment to the General Plan Land Use Element from Professional Office to General Commercial. 2. Obtain approval of a change of zone from M -I PD BE (Light Manufacturing, Planned Development Overlay, Billboard Exclusion) to C-2 (Community Commercial) with a Planned Development y Overla. 3. Obtain approval of a Specific Plan to ensure a comprehensive development and advance the goals and objectives of the General Plan. ct Carfct with anv applicable habitat conservation plan or natural eonirnunity conservation plan? No I mpact. T he subject project area is not within any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan area. Therefore, no mitigation measures would be required. City of Diamond Bar - Initial Study General Plan amendment 2002-01 - 850 Brea Canyon Road Page 27 o1`35 X. MINERAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? No Impact- According to t he C ity o f D iamond B ar O pen S pace a nd C onservation E lement, n o m ineral deposits of statewide or regional importance exist in the City. Therefore, no significant impacts would occur and no mitigation measures would be required. b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? No Impact. See Response X a, above. Xl. NOISE: Would the project result in: (1) Exposure ofpersons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards ofother agencies? Less Than Significant Impact. The equipment used on the project site will generate noise above the ambient levels for limited periods of time during construction. Due to the proximity of the construction site to existing residential buildings, and due to the levels of noise generated by construction equipment without mitigation measures, adjacent properties would be subjected to higher than ambient noise levels during normal daylight hours during the construction period. It is anticipated that in a worst case scenario huddings, located within 1,000 feet of construction equipment noise generators, would be subject to noise of approximately 65dB(A). Normal building construction methods and materials will reduce interior noise levels to within acceptable limits. The Community N Oise Equivalent Level (CNFL) o f5 5-60 will be enforced for the project. The City's General Plan Public Health and Safety Element indicates that a Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNF.L) of 55-60 is considered as "Normally Acceptable" for commercial areas. The amount of noise intrusion with respect to the existing surrounding buildings during construction will vary depending upon where construction is occurring. When the construction is completed, no noise impacts are anticipated. The proposed project will be consistent with the zone and will not generate noise levels that exceed local standards. The short term of the potential noise intrusion is considered to be less than significant. Therefore, no mitigation measures are proposed or required. 1'1 Exposure ofpersons to orgeneration ofexcessive groundborne vibration orgroundborne noise levels? Less Than Significant Impact. Construction equipment can generate noise levels in the range of 60 to 90 dBfA). The introduction of construction equipment in this area will expose residential occupants to intermittent high noise levels that could approach 90 dB(A) within 50 feet of the construction activity. Although the increase in noise in the project area will be greater than that which currently exists, it will be localized and will be temporary in name and will cease upon completion of the project. There are no noise sensitive land uses located near the project area that may be affected by construction noise. The proposed commercial use will not generate excessive groundborne vibration nor groundborne noise levels. Therefore, no mitigation measures are proposed or required. City of Diamond Bar -Initial Study Gencral Plan Amendment 2002-01 - 850 Brea Canyon Road Page 28 of 35 C) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? No Impact. The proposed construction activity is temporary and noise will localize and be confined to the development site. At the completion of the construction activity no permanent increase in ambient noise levels will be generated by the commercial use. d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Less Than Significant Impact. The equipment used on the project site will generate noise above the ambient levels for limited periods of time during construction. Due to the proximity of the construction site to existing residential buildings, and due to the levels of noise generated by construction equipment without mitigation measures, adjacent properties would he subjected to temporary or periodic higher than ambient noise levels during normal business hours during the construction period. It is anticipated that in a worst case scenario buildings, located within 1 ,000 feet o f c onst action e quipment n oise g enerators, w ould b e subject to noise of approximately 65dB(A). However, the Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) for new constntction will be enforced by the City for the project. The City's General Plan Noise Element indicates that a Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) of 55- 60 is considered as "Normally Acceptable" for commercial areas. The amount of noise intrusion with respect to the existing surrounding buildings during construction will vary depending upon where the localized construction is occurring. The construction equipment will be required to comply with City regulations with respect to the use of mufflers. When the construction is completed, no noise impacts are anticipated. The proposed commercial improvements are compatible with and the equivalent o f e xisting area improvements, and as such will not generate any increase in ambient noise above current vicinity levels. The potential short-term noise impacts generated by construction equipment will be mitigated by the use of mufflers. Construction activity will be confined to normal business hours. Therefore, no significant impacts would occur and no mitigation measures would be required. et For o projccr located widen an airport land use plm, or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within rh+n mth'r of a public airport or public use airport, world the project expose people residing or working in rhr protect m -ea to excessive noire levels' Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will not expose people working in the area to permanent high noise levels. However, temporary noise levels may increase because of the type of construction activm anticipated. See Response to Section XI (a), above. li For a protect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working Hi the' protccl area to excessive noise levels' No Impact. The p roject s ite is n of I ocated i n t he v icinny of a private airstrip. Therefore, no significant impacts would occur and no mitigation measures would be required. XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING: Would the project: al Induce substantial population growdt in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) m indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) ? No Impact. Although the proposed commercial development will generate additional employment Opportunities, it is not significant enough to increase population from relocating to the area. It is not anticipated to directly or indirectly induce substantial population growth. Additionally, no residential uses City of Diamond Bar- Initial Studv General Plan Amendment 2002-01 - 850 Brea Canyon Road Page 29 of 35 within the City of Diamond Bar are associated with the project and the project will not require the extension of infrastructure in an area not previously served. Therefore, no significant impacts would occur and no mitigation measures would be required. b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No Impact. No existing housing is located on the project site nor would any housing be displaced by the implementation of the proposed project. Therefore, no significant impacts would occur and no mitigation measures would be required. C) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No Impact. See Response XII b, above. %III. PUBLIC SERVICES; Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the following public services: a) Fire protection? No Impact, The Los Angeles County Consolidated Fire Protection District provides fire protection for the project area. All water mains and fire hydrants will be required to be installed in accordance with the Fire Department guidelines and are subject to approval by the Fire Department. Adherence to these guidelines will ensure that no significant impacts on fire protection services and facilities will occur as a result of this project. Therefore, no mitigation measures would be required. h) Police protection? No Impact. No significant impacts on existing police protection facilities are expected to occur as a result of this project. No mitigation measures would be required. cl Schools' No Impact. Nn significant impacts on existing school facilities will occur as a result of this project. -1 herefore, no mitteation mcasures would be required. dt pm As:, No Impact. No significant impacts on existing parks will occur as a result of the proposed project since the project would not displace any public or private recreational uses. Therefore, no significant impacts would occur and no mitigation measures would be required. C) Other- public facilities? No Impact. No additional impacts to other public facilities have been identified. Refer to Section XVI for a discussion on utilities and service systems. No mitigation measures would be required. (try of Diamond Bar - Initial Study General Plan Amendment 2002-01 - 850 Brea Canyon Road Page 30 of 35 XIV. RECREATION: Would the project: a) Cause an increase in the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? No Impact. The proposed project will have no direct effect on existing recreational facilities. No increases in the demand for such facilities will occur as a result o f this project. Therefore, no significant impacts would occur and no mitigation measures would be required. b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have all adverse phYsical effect ora the environment? No Impact. The proposed project does not include nor require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities. Existing recreational opportunities will not be affected by project implementation. Therefore, no significant impacts would occur and no mitigation measures would be required. SV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC: Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in relation to file existing traffic load and capacity of the street systen (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity' ratio oil roads, or congestion at intersections)? Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated. The project has a single entry point onto Brea Canyon Road, which has been designed to City standards to handle the anticipated traffic volumes. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project will not result in traffic generation above that of planned system capacity. However, site and roadway improvements (Brea Canyon Road) are necessary to ensure adequate ingress/egress from the site onto Brea Canyon Road. A detailed Traffic Impact Analysis (RK Engineering Group, Inc.. May 31, 2002) has been prepared and reviewed by the City's Traffic Engineer. The following mitigation measures will be implemented to ensure project -related traffic impacts are less than significant. Mitigation Measures 1. Provide a deceleration lane into the project site for traffic heading north. Install a raised median on Brea Canyon Road with left turn pocket into the site for south bound traffic. Provide a dedicated left turn pocket and signal improvements at Lycoming Street and Brea Canyon Road to allow for independent left turns and u -turns for north bound traffic. Inst all a "pork chop" island a t t he a ntrance to the site to force traffic in orth exiting the property. hl Exceed. either undividuallr or cuntulativelr, a level of service standard established by the county congc.gtinn management agencv for designated roads or higlnvays' No Impacl. The project does not propose any use, which could cause the level of service standard, which has been established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways to be exceeded, either individually or cumulatively. Therefore, no mitigation measures are necessary. cl Result in a change in all- traffic patterns, including either- all increase in traffe levels or a change in location that results in substantial safeh risks' City of Diamond Bar - Initial Study General Plan Amendment 2002-01 - 650 Brea Canyon Road Page 31 of 35 No Impact. The project does riot propose any use, which could cause, any changes to traffic patterns, a significant increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks. Therefore, no significant impacts would occur and no mitigation measures would be required. d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? No Impact. With the proposed site design improvements and off-site traffic mitigation measures, no hazards to safety from design features or incompatible uses are anticipated. Although it is possible that construction activities could expose the affected street to some potential hazards associated with construction activities, adequate precautions will be taken to minimize that exposure. Therefore, no significant impacts would occur and no mitigation measures would be required. e) Result in inadequate emergency access? No Impact. Emergency access to the project site and the adjoining land uses will be maintained during the course of construction. Final project design will be subject to review by the City of Diamond Bar to ensure adequate emergency vehicle access prior to permit issuance. No mitigation measures would be required. J) Result in inadequate parking capacity? No Impact. Adequate on-site parking for the proposed development will be provided consistent with the requirements of the City of Diamond Bar Development Code. No mitigation measures would be required. g) Conllici with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicvcle racks)? No Impact. The project will not conflict with alternative transportation policies, programs and plans. Additionally. the project must comply with the City's adopted Transportation Demand Management Ordinance. Therefore, no mitigation measures would be required. XVI. i1TILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project: or 6.viceed unstcwater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? No Impact. Adequale wastewater treatment and sewer infrastructures are in place to serve the proposed commercial development. Therefore, no significant impacts will occur and the project will thus not exceed wastewater treatment requirements. Ni) mitigation measures would be required. b) Requu c or result in the construction of ne"' crater or, wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of r.rr.rting facilities, the constriction of which could ceruse significant environmental effects? No Impact. Construction of the proposed project will riot require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities. Because the project area is largely developed, water and sewer infrastructures are in place, and no mitigation measures would be required. C) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existtng facilities, the construction ofwhiclr could cause significant environmental effects? No Impact. The proposed commercial development will require onsite construction of drainage improvements to convey storm water flows to area drainage facilities in accordance with City regulations. No mitigation measures would be required. City of Diamond Bar - Initial Studv General Plan Amendment 2002-01 - 850 Brea Canyon Road Page 32 of 35 dl Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed. No Impact. Refer to Response XVI(b), above. e) Result in a determination by the tvastewater, n-eannent provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? No Impact. Refer to Response XVI( b), above. fl Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? No Impact. Existing landfills have sufficient capacity to serve the needs of the proposed project. No mitigation measures would be required. g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? No Impact. All local,crate, andfederal guidelinesregardingsolid wastewill becompliedwithduring project construction and operation. No mitigation measures would be required. XN711. NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (STORMWATER): a1 Would the proposal result in storm water system discharges from areas for materials storage, vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing), waste handling, hazardous materials handling or storage delivery or loading clocks Or other work areas? No Impact. The proposed commercial development will not result in storm water system discharges from materials storage, vehicle or equipment fueling or maintenance given the proposed use of the site as a retail, restaurant and hospitality establishments. However, the project will be required to comply with the locally adopted National Pollution Discharge Elim nation System (NPDES) requirements as federally mandated. No mitigation measures would be required. bf I Mould rhr proposal result in a significant envi onmentallr harmful increase in the flow or volume of storm Crater rtmofl ) No Impact. The proposed commercial development will not result in any significant environmentally harmful increase in either the volume or flow of s term water runoff. The project will generate minimal surface effluents resulting primarily from paved parking areas. Source control as required by National Pollution Discharge Elinunation System (NPDES) requirements will eliminate or contain the effluents, thereby minimizing their impact on storm water runoff. Therefore, no mitigation measures would be required. cl Would the proposal result in a significantly environmental harmful increase in erosion of the project site or surrounding areas' No Impact. The proposed commercial development will not provide for any erosion of the project site or the surrounding areas. The proposed project will provide for the construction of a new commercial City of Diamond Bar - Initial Studv General Plan Amendment 2002-01 - 850 Brea Canyon Road Page 33 W'35 building and paving on areas which are currently unimproved, and no subsequent soil erosion is anticipated. Therefore, no mitigation measures would be required. d) Would the proposal result in storm water discharges that would significantly impair the beneficial uses of receiving waters or areas that provide water quality benefits (e.g. riparian corridors, wetlands, etc.)? No Impact. The proposed commercial development will not result in storm water discharges that would significantly impair the beneficial uses of receiving waters or areas that provide water quality benefits. Therefore, no mitigation measures would be required. Would the proposal result in hams to the biological integrity of drainage systems and water bodies? No Impact. The proposed commercial development will not result in any harm to the biological integrity of either drainage systems or water bodies. Therefore, no mitigation measures would be required. \VIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: a) Does t he p r•oject h ave t hep otential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a /ish or wildlife species, cause afiildliwfe population to drop below subsustaining levels, threaren to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant ori animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistmy7 No Impact. Based on the preceding analysis, the proposed project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered p lant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. Construction of the commercial buildings shall be subject to the receipt of the appropriate permits from the respective governing jurisdictions. Nloreover, no sensitive species have been observed in the riparian area. Therefore, no mitigation measures would be required. h) Dues rhe project have impacts that are individually linter, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerahlc " nrcan.s that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the elects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future prajcrt.$) ' No Impact. The project will not contribute to cumulatively considerable impacts. All potential impacts of rmplemcntm!-, the proposed project in the context of the existing setting, current projects and probable funic projects have been considered for all environmental categories contained in this section and no significant impacts after mitigation have been identified. Therefore, no mitigation measures would be required. Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse ejjects on human beings, either directly or indirectly' No Impact. With the implementation of permit and code requirements as well as adoption of the recommended mitigation measures no direct or indirect adverse effects would occur on human beings. Therefore, no mitigation measures would be required. XIX. EARLIER ANALYSES: Earlier- analyses may be used where, pursuant to a program EIR, tiering, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration. Section 15063 (c) (3) (D). City of Diamond Bar - Initial Study General Flan Amendment 2002-01 - 850 Brea Canyon Road Page 34 of 35 a) Earlier analvses used. Identify earlier ana/uses used and state inhere they are available for review. 1) City of Diamond Bar General Plan Final EIR (1995) 2) City of Diamond Bar General Plan (1995) 3) City of Diamond Bar Zoning Map (Revised, November 1998) 4) City of Diamond Bar Development Code (Adopted. November 1998) 5) Traffic Impact Analysis (RK Engineering Group, Inc., May 31, 2002) All documents listed above are on file and may be reviewed at the City of Diamond Bar Community and Development Services Department, Planning Division, 2185 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California 91765, (909) 860-2489. City of Diamond Bar - Initial Study General Plan Amendment 2002-01 - 850 Brca Canyon Road Page 35 of 35 City of Diamond Bar Community & Development Services Department Planning Division California Environmental Quality flet 21925 F. Copley Drive Mitigated Negative Declaration Diamond Bar,Cal09)39 91765 -5676 JA (909) 396-5676 (909) 861-3117 Fax www.Ci tvorDiamondBancom To: ® Los Angeles County Clerk's Office ❑ Office of'Planning and Research Environmental Filing 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 12400 E. Imperial Highway, Room 2001 Sacramento, California 95814 Norwalk, California 90650 Project Title and File No.: General Plan Amendment 2002-01, Zone Change 2002-01, Specific Plan 2002-01, Development Review 2002-07, Conditional Use Permit 2002-05, Tentative Parcel Map No. 26771, and Tree Permit No. 2002-10 Project Location: 850 Brea Canyon Road, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 (Los Angeles County) Project Description: The proposed project is a request for approval of a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Specific Plan, Development Review, Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Parcel Map. This would allow for the construction of a retailicommercial shopping center consisting of a three- story hotel, two fieestanding restaurants, and two office/retail building pads totaling approximately 70,370 square feet of gross building area. The proposed development will be located on an approximate 6.50 gross acre site. Project Sponsor: Phil Williams (Extended Stay America), 2525 Cherry Avenue, #310, Signal Hill, CA 90806 This is to advise that the City of Diamond Dar, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based on the following findute: ® The Initial Study shovrs that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the cm ironment_ ❑ The Initial Stude identified potentially significant effects but: 1 Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where cicarh no significant effects would occur, and (21 There is no substantial evidence before the aeenc_v that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the cm unnment. The C % Council hereby finds that the Mitigated Negative Dcclaranon reflects its independent judgement. A copy of the Initial Study, and any applicable mitigation measures, and any other material which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Cit' haled its decision to adopt this Mitigated Negative Declaration may be obtained at: City of Damond Bar Cornmunity and Development Services Department/Planning Division 21825 [, Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 (909)396-5676 The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period, which ends October _2, 2002 Planning Consultant September 26, 2002 Signature Title Date —_ ❑ I:os Angeles County Clerk's Office Date received for filing and posting ❑ OPR CASCO Western Region LETTER OE —OREMTIONs Plans for the Extended Stay America ("ESA") in the City of Diamond Bar would consist of a 116-roorn design. The first or ground floor of the hotel will contain 3 quest check-in area guest laundry, vending area, housek service area, and front office area. The remaining first floor and other floors will be occupied bping y . Th guestrooms vary in size from 305 to 400 square feet, depending on location and the number of beds.guestmomsThe large e majority of our guestrooms are typically queen bedded rooms, with the remaining moms offering king, double/double and handicap configurations. All of our guestrooms contain a kitchenette. Our kftcnenettes contain a full size refrigerator, built-in twin burner stove top, built-in microwave oven, coffee maker, and stainless steel sink. Cupboard areas in the kitchenette Provide silverware, dishes, cookware, and cooking utensils. The kitchenettes are typically located in the front area of the guestroom, while the main living area is to the rear. Guestroom furnishings include a dresser, workidining table with chairs, desk with chair, nightstand, and reclining easy chair. A 19" color television with remote control and alarm clock is also provided. The quality of our furnishings is high and the style is traditional, featuring dark greens, dark reds, and dark woods for the furniture. Individual telephones provide the convenience Of voicemail, which can be retrieved from either in or outside the hotel ano are also equipped with Port hookups for computers, etc. The bathroom contains the usual fixtures and features a bath/shower combination ESA's guest mix in Diamond Bar will consist of both businesb travelers, leisure/vacation oriented guests and airport related business, as well as relocations to the Los Angeles/ Orange County Areas. This site will allow us to Pull Quests from City of Industry, Pomona, and Fullerton and from our Walnut facility. On a nationwide basis, some of the most frequent corporate guests are affiliated with State Farm insurance, Fluor Daniel, ISM,'Lucent Technologies. Lockheed, Boeing, General Electric and General Motors Any c1r)er hotel company can't match ESA's track record in Southern Califb ' m a-1just 11WO years b n u a e over 3 yea me ESA has opened sixteen (16) hotels in Southern California with a combined mom count of approximately 2,000 rooms All of these hotels were now construction. ESA's first hotel in Southern California opened in Ontario near the airport in May of 1997, while our most recent opening was in Woodland Hilts, seven mon age. ES currently has another 284 rooms under construction in Anaheim near D la 11 , s e this A isneyland and Newport Beach adjacent to John V*Vavne International Airport, both of which are slated to open in March 2001. ESA's Southern Callfomia,s aeveicDment plans for 2001 call for at least another six (6) hotels to start construction. Extended Stay America is a publicly traded COMP2ny and a self-financing entity and has developed over 390 hotels in the last five (5) years. Dallas Texas21 Louis Missoun 15 1 Ka lin us Drive, suit. "-a Costa Mesa. California 92626 Atlarria, Georgm Edison. Now Jersey Tel: (714) 751-9"4 - Fax: (714) 751-0170 OVERALL SITE PLAN 11 ---------- Exhibit "B" (December 109 2002) - C.- M - W, ,,M AREA CALCULATIONS V � FL®®R PLAN F -H FLOOR PLAN .......... ND �� FLOOR PLAN - PAROL 2 ® - - PL®®R PLAN o PARCEL 4 x FLOOR PLANS - PARCELS 1 +3 El V_ .lf' EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS x ELEVATIONS m PARCEL 1 ELEVATIONS ® PARCEL 4 x ELEVATIONS - PARCEL 2 "EVATIONS - PARCEL 3 �; : PH®T®MTRICS TREE AS BUILT SURVEY m D a< s - c aoan E e - - s m xD -o o � az m = a f. . TREE AS BUILT SURVEY m D a< s - TREE AS BUILT SURVEY date: January 22,2OO1 client: CASCO Corp. project: ESA Diamond Bar present: Cliff Hoskins This is an observation report for the proposed ESA site in Diamond Bar California. Hoahinu+HoskinnCorp. was asked toevaluate the trees onthe site, identifying those that are suitable hz retain inthe future landscape. General description: The site iucurrently being used aaanrecreational vehicle storage lot. There are rows ofAsh and Pepper trees along the borders of the site and scattered trees (mostly Ash) through the site. It appears that the trees were intended aushade and screening from the freeway The trees along the adjacent storm drain channel appear tnbeoutside ofthe property and therefore out of consideration. The trees along the freeway are appear tobeon site. It is our professional opinion that the Ash and California Pepper trees along the freeway edge beretained. Any other trees, (Brazilian Popper. Olive, Beefmnod )nhnu|d be removed and the roots removed from the ground. All ofthe retained trees should be pruned and shaped. All the trees that are topped and stunted or tw/stodahou|dberemnved Poorly pruned trees present asafety hazard and effect their long term health. All ofthe trees mthe interior ofthe site should beremoved and their roots removed from the ground. This includes all the Ash, Brazilian Pepper. the Mulberry and Palm trees. The Ash are misshapen from poor pruning as is the Mulberry tree. The Palm could herelocated but does not fit into proposed landscape concept. The trees along Brea Canyon Blvd. are amixed group ofAsh, 800i|/an Pepper, Podoomqpun and Eucalyptus. The Ash trees were not pruned tnshape and some are irreparable. The same intrue for the Brazilian Pepper, Podonamusand Eucalyptus. Afew ofthe Eucalyptus are salvageable with careful pruning - All of the retained trees need to be feed and permanent irrigation mnmg-A(|of\heretomed1reeaneedtobef:edandpennanentimgadon installed otthe base nfeach tree Please see ALTA plan herewith with trees tnberetained and deleted identified, Wewill return tothe site and flag all the trees 0o be removed axyour request. - ox _ A T - - - O o Al' I r P P P c z y I P i f r _ I P P P r UPI Dqq I; Vat -4 A u May 31, 2002 Mr. Allyn Taylor EXTENDED STAY AMERICA, INC. 8407 Cross Country Drive Humble TX 77346 Subject: Extended Stay America Traffic Impact Analysis (Revised) Dear Mr. Taylor: RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. is pleased to submit the Extended Stay America Traffic Impact Analysis for the project site located east of Brea Canyon Road between Lycoming Street and State Route 60 (SR -60) westbound ramps in the City of Diamond Bar This report provides a summary of the findings, analysis procedures and evaluation of the proposed project with respect to on-site and off-site traffic impacts, pursuant to City of Diamond Bar requirements. Based upon this study. the proposed project can be accommodated within the planned circulation system. if the recommended improvements are implemented. These recommendations are included in the "Recommendations" section of this report. If you have any questions regarding this study, please do not hesitate to call us at (949) 949-0809 Sincerely RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. Robert Kahn. P.E Principal RK FY rd/816 JN 0778-02-01 Attachments xc: Mr. Al Anz, ANZ COMPANY Frank Yeh Transportation Planner [Rifil W101 zwofill 11120) V Newport Beach, CA 92660 Robert Kahn, P.E. Frank Yeh May 31, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ---------------------------' 1 A. Project Description B. Purpose ofReport and Study Objectives C. Site Location D. Study Area Methodology 1 ICU Method 2. HCM/Nethod 3. Roadway Link V8CRatio D. Principal Findings E. Project Recommendations U. SETTING ------- A, Land Use 4 Existing Land Uses 2 Approved Future Development B Study Area Roadway System 1 Area ofSignificant Traffic impact 2 Master Plan ofArterial Highwoys ||| PROJECTED TRAFFIC ... ........ '--'—'—....... --... ............................... 21 A Site Traffic 1 Trip Generation 2 Trip Distribution � Modal Split 4 Trip Assignment B Future Traffic l Opening Year (2OO4)Traffic |V TRAFFIC ANALYSIS -- —--'...... --...... ---.............. ......... 33 A Level Of Service at Existing Conditions I ICU 2 VKCRatio B Leve/ Of Service at Ex/o1my Plus Project Conditions 1 ICU u V/CRaho C Level cfService at Opening Year (204)Without Project 1 , ICU 2 VACRabo D. Level ofService atOpening Year (2U04)With Project I ICU and HCM 2. V/CRado E. Project Significance Impact toIntersections and Roadway Segments 1 Intersections Z Roadway Segments F. Project Traffic Contribution V. RECOMMENDATIONS ........... ........................................................................... 51 A. Site Access B. Roadway Improvements 1 Off -Sha 2, On -Site APPENDICES LEVEL OFSERVICE DESCRIPTION ...... .............................. ----------' |HAFF|CCOUNTYVDRKGMEETG--------------- ---------- ICU CALCULATIONS EXISTING ............ |CUCALCUL4�l|DN3 EX|ST|NGPLUSPROJECT-- -------------- ICU CALCULATIONS OPENING YEAR (ZOO4)WITHOUT PROJECT .................. ICU CALCULATIONS OPENING YEAR (2OO4)WITH PROJECT .......................... 10 Is EXHIBIT PAGE A LOCATION MAP ---------------------------- 2 B SITE PLAN -----_--------__________________ C OPENING YEAR CIRCULATION RECOMMENDATIONS .................... 12 D PARKING LOT RECONF|GURAT0N . .................................................. 13 E CUMULATIVE PRDJECTS _.......................... ................................. 18 F Fx/�rm�m//muc"",`"��...... ...-- _._.—vr/nnuu*nuAm�u AND INTERSECTION � ....................................................... 18 G EXISTING TRAFFIC � 19 H CITY OFDIAMOND BAR GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT ........ ............................ —........... ........ ....... 20 / PROJECT OUTBOUND TRIP DISTRIBUTION ..................................... � PROJECT INBOUND TRIP DISTRIBUTION .......................................... K CUMULATIVE PROJECTS TRIP DISTRIBUTION .... ............................ 28 L PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES ......... _....... ........ ......................... 29 M OPENING YEAR (20O4)WITHOUT PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES -------------------' 31 N OPENING YEAR (2U04)WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES -------------------' 32 TABLE PAGE 1 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION RATES .................................... ....... 22 2 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION .............................. ......... ... —... ..... 23 3 CUMULATIVE PROJECTS TRIP GENERATION ...... ........................... 24 4 EXISTING INTERSECTION LEVELS OFSERVICE WITH EXISTING LANE CONFIGURATIONS .................................... ... 34 5 EXISTING ROADWAY VOLUME TOCAPACITY RATIO ..................... 35 b EXISTING PLUS PROJECT INTERSECTION LEVELS OFSERVICE ---------------............................. 36 / EXISTING PLUS PROJECT ROADWAY VOLUME TOCAPACITY RATIO ............................................................ 313 o OPENING YEAR (20O4)WITHOUT PROJECT INTERSECTION LEVELS OFSERVICE ................................................ 39 y OPENING YEAR (2OO4) WITHOUT PROJECT ROADWAY VOLUME TOCAPACITY RATIO .......................... ........... - 41 10 OPENING YEAR (2OD4)WITH PROJECT INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE. ............................................... 42 l� OPENING YEAR (2OO4)WITH PROJECT ROADWAY VOLUME T0CAPACITY RATIO ........................................ 44 12 OPENING YEAR (2OO4) PROJECT INTERSECTION LEVELS OFSERVICE SIGNIFICANCE EVALUATION .... .......... —..... 48 13 OPENING YEAR C2OU4 PROJECT ROADWAY VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIO SIGNIFICANCE EVALUATION .................. ............ 47 14 PROJECT TRAFFIC CONTRIBUTION —............................. ..... .... —' 49 15 PROJECT ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A. Lgiq t Description The proposed project consists of a 166 -room business hotel, three (3) freestanding restaurants and one office/retail building pad. The site is currently occupied with a recreation vehicle storage facility. The project location is shown in Exhibit A The site plan for the project is illustrated in Exhibit B. B Purpose of Report and Study Objectives The purpose of this traffic impact analysis is to evaluate the development of the Extended Stay America project from a traffic circulation standpoint. Study objectives include (1) documentation of existing traffic conditions in the vicinity of the site: (2) calculation of the existing plus project conditions; (3) calculation of the Opening Year (2004) traffic conditions without and with the project; (4) evaluation of ingress/egress points for the development: and (5) determination of on-site and off-site improvements and system management actions needed to achieve City of Diamond Bar level of service requirements C Site Location The project site is located on the east side of Brea Canyon Road between Lycoming Street and the State Route 60 (SR -60) westbound off -ramp in the City of Diamond Bar Exhibit A illustrates the traffic analysis study area which was established in discussions with City of Diamond Bar staff. D Study Area and Methodolagy The study area includes the following intersections: Brea Canyon Road (NS) at: ® Lycoming Street (EV) 1 ® SR -60 Westbound Ramps (EWV) ® Golden Springs Drive (EW) ® West Project Driveway (EW) SR -60 Eastbound Ramps (NS) at: ® Golden Springs Drive (EWV) Northerly Project Driveway (NS) at: ® Lycoming Street (EW) ICU Method The technique used to assess the operation of an intersection is known as Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU). To calculate an ICU the volume of traffic using the intersection is compared with the capacity of the intersection. ICU is usually expressed as a percent. The percent represents that portion of the hour required to provide sufficient capacity to accommodate all intersection traffic if all approaches operate at capacity. An explanation of Level of Service is included in Appendix "A". Calculation Method a Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) for study area intersections, b Saturation Flow Rate Saturation flow value of 1,600 vehicles per lane per hour for through lanes. 1.600 vehicles per hour for single turn lanes and 2,880 for dual turn lanes: no adjustments are used for protected movements with dedicated lanes (including both right and left turns). c Clearance Internal: A clearance interval factor of 10% (0.10) is applied to the ICU calculations. 4 The following thresholds are used in assigning a letter value to the resulting LOS: CRITICAL VOLUME TO LOS CAPACITY RATIO A 0.00-0.60 B 0.61 -0,70 C 0.71 -0.80 D 0.81-0.90 E 0.91 -1.00 F >1.00 e. Peak -Periods: Weekday peak -hour analysis periods are defined as follows: 7:00 to 9.00 AM 4:00 to 6:00 PM f Peak -Hour The highest one-hour period in both the AM and PM peak periods, as determined by four consecutive 15 -minute count periods are used in the ICU calculations Both AM and PM peak hours are studied. g Peak -Hour Data Consistency. Variations in peak -hour volumes can affect LOS calculations because they vary from day-to-day. To minimize these variations, no counts are taken on Mondays, Fridays, holidays or weekends. The traffic count worksheets for this study is included in Appendix "B". 5 h. Right Turn Movements: If the distance from the edge of the outside through lane is at least 19 feet and parking is prohibited during the peak period, right turning vehicles may be assumed to utilize this "unofficial" right turn lane. Otherwise, all right turn traffic is assigned to the through lane. If a right turn lane exists, right turn activity is checked for conflicts with other critical movements. It is assumed that right turn movements are accommodated during non -conflicting left turn phases (e.g., northbound right turns during westbound left turn phase), as well as non -conflicting through flows (e.g., northbound right turn movements and north/south through flows). Right turn movements become critical when conflicting movements (e.g., northbound right turns, southbound left turns, and eastbound through flows) represent a sum of V/C ratios which are greater than the normal through/left turn critical movements 2. HCM Method However. ICU method is not an appropriate method for analyzing an unsignaiized intersection. Since the intersection of the project driveways at Brea Canyon Road and Lycoming Street are unsignalized intersections, anotner analysis method is needed. Therefore, the HCM (Highway Capacity Manual) method is also used in this study. The HCM method evaluates the average delay per vehicle at the intersections. The current technical guide to the evaluation of average delay is the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 2000. HCM 2000 defines level of service as a qualitative measure which describes operational conditions within a traffic stream, generally in terms of such factors as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort and convenience, and safety The criteria used to evaluate LOS (Level of Service) conditions vary based on the type of roadway and whether the traffic flow is considered interrupted or uninterrupted. The definitions of level of service for uninterrupted flow (flow unrestrained by the existence of traffic control devices) are: 6 ° LOS � represents free flow. Individual users are virtually ' unaffected by the presence of others in the traffic stream. � LOS "B" is in the range of stable flow, but the presence of other users in the traffic stream begins to be noticeable. Freedom to select desired speeds is m/ohve|y unmffected, but there is a slight decline in the freedom to maneuver. ° LOS "C^mmthe range of stable flow, but marks the beginning of the range offlow mwhich the operation ofindividual users becomes significantly affected byinteractions with others inthe traffic stream. " LOS "T represents high-density but stable flow. Speed and freedom to maneuver are severely n*otricted, and the driver experiences egenerally poor level ofcomfort and convenience. " LOS "E" represents operating conditions at or near the capacity level All speeds are reduced 0oa low, but relatively uniform value. Small increases inflow will cause breakdowns intraffic movemert. ° LOS 'F^ is used to define forced or breakdown flow. This condition ex/ms wherever the amount of traffic approaching o point exceeds the amount which can traverse the point. Queues form behind such ioueoona To, achnnmnr of level nfservice for interrupted traffic flow (flow restrained by /he existence of traffic signals and other traffic control devices)differooghUydependingnn!hetypeo/tnsfhucontmi The level ofservice atypically dependent onthe quality oftraffic flow atthe moameohnno along u maUway. Highway Capacity Manual (HC[W) 2000 methodology expresses the level of service at an intersection in 1*nnu of delay time for the various intersection approaches. The HCk8uses different procedures depending onthe type ofintersection control. 7 Study area intersections which are stop sign controlled with stop control on the minor street only have been analyzed using the unoigna|ized intersection methodology of the HCMFor these intersecdons, the calculation of level of service is dependent on the occurrence of gaps occurring in the ,xaffiu flow of the main street. Using data collected describing the intersection configuration and traffic volumes at this location, the level ofservice has been calculated. The level of services for cross -street stop uonkn| intersections are defined as follows: Roadway Link V/C Ratio In addition to intersection analysis. the roadways in the vicinity of the project site have been analyzed by vol ume-tooapacity (VYC) ratio. The City of Diamond Bar requires Level ofService ''C^ (V/C = 0.80) as its evaluation criteria for roadway segment analysis. The following summarizes the daily traffic capacities for different types roadways: TYPE UFROADWAY 0Lanes Divided 4Lanes Divided aLanes Undivided 2Lanes Undivided Local Road F; MAXIMUM DAILY CAPACITY 55.3D0vehicles per day 37.5OOvehicles per day Z5,UO0vehicles per day 12.5U0vehicles per day 3.1OOvehicles per day, The proposed development is projected to generate approximately 3.936 trip -ends per day with 287 vehicles per hour during the AM peak hour and 306 vehicles per hour during the PM peak hour. Taking into consideration pass -by trips for the various uses, the project is expected to generate a total of approximately 1,964 new trip -ends per day with 148 vehicles per hour during the AM peak hour and 158 vehicles per hour during the PM peak hour. 2 For existing traffic conditions, the study area intersections are operating at Level of Service "D" or better during the peak hours, except at Golden Springs Drive and Brea Canyon Road. All roadway links in the study area are currently have V/C ratios better than 0.80 except for Golden Springs Drive east of Brea Canyon Road. 3 For existing plus project conditions, all study area intersections are projected to operate at Level of Service "D" or better with the exception of Brea Canyon Road at the SR -60 westbound ramp which is projected to operate at Level of Service "D" during the AM peak hour and Level of Service "E' during the PM peak hour and at the intersection of Brea Canyon Road at Golden Springs Drive. which is projected to operate at Level of Service "E' during the AM peak hour and Level of Service "F" during the PM peak hour 4 For Opening Year (2004) without project traffic conditions all of the study area intersections are projected to operate at Level of Service "P" or worse during the peak hours with existing lane configurations. All the roadway links are projected to have V/C ratios better than 0.80 except for Brea Canyon Road from SR -60 westbound ramps and to north of Lycoming Street and Golden Springs Drive from SR -60 eastbound ramps to east of Brea Canyon Road 5. For Opening Year (2004) with project traffic conditions, the study area intersections are projected to operate at Level of Service °E" or worse during the peak hours with existing lane configurations with the exception of the project driveways. All the roadway links are projected to have V/C ratios better than 0.80 except the following roadway segments ® Brea Canyon Road north of SR -60 westbound ramps ® Golden Springs Drive east of Brea Canyon Road 6. The addition of the project traffic produces an increase of more than 0.02 in the ICU value (significant impact) for Opening Year (2004) at only one intersection. As shown in Table 13, the project does have a significant traffic impact at the intersection of Brea Canyon Road at Lycoming Street. Therefore, the project should contribute to the improvements to that study area intersection. 7 Based on the roadway segment analysis, the addition of the project traffic produces an increase of more than 0.02 in the V/C ratio value (significant impact) at one location (Brea Canyon Road north of SR -60 westbound ramps) Therefore, the project creates significant traffic impact at this one roadway segment and the project should contribute to this improvement. 8 For Opening Year (2004) with project traffic conditions, the study area intersections are projected to operate at unacceptable level of service during the peak hours with existing lane configurations. However, with the recommended street improvements. all the study area intersections are projected to operate at Level of Service 'D" or better. Most of the roadway links are projected to have V/C ratios better than 0.80 except the following roadway segments, in which they are projected to be over -capacity ® Brea Canyon Road north of SR -60 westbound ramps to north of Lycoming Street ® Golden Springs Drive between SR -60 eastbound ramps to east of Brea Canyon Road. 10 9. Based on the HCM intersection analysis, the unsignalized intersections of west and north project service for Opening project conditions. 10. This traffic study is in compliance with the traffic study requirements for the Los Angeles County CMP (Congestion Management Program). The level of service standards utilized in this study, are equal to or more conservative than the CMP standards. F Project Recommendations The Opening Year circulation recommendations are summarized in Exhibits C and D. 1 The proposed project will have one access driveway on Brea Canyon Road and one on Lycoming Street north. The westerly and northerly project driveways should be stop -controlled with minimum widths of 30 feet. The west project driveway should be restricted to right-in/right-out and left -in access with raised median channelization along Brea Canyon Road. Project recommendations are shown in Exhibit C. The north driveway should be a full access as shown in Exhibit D. The project should contribute on a fair -share basis to the following intersection improvements recommended for the Opening Year conditions (see Exhibit C). a For the intersection of Lycoming Street at Brea Canyon Road - 0 Provide a westbound left turn lane This improvement is feasible by resthping Lycoming Street to have a two-way left turn median. 11 3Reatripe Brea Canyon Road from the westbound SR -00 Freeway off -ramp to Lycoming Street to provide three (3) lanes in each direction. 4. Trafficmgning/skiping should be implemented inconjunction with detailed construction plans for the project. See Exhibit D for recommended location of stop signs. 5. Sight distance at the project access driveways should be reviewed with respect to City of Diamond Bar sight distance standards in conjunction with the preparation ofprecise grading and landscape plans. MI A. Land Use Existing Land Uses The site is currently a recreation vehicle storage facility. Adjacent uses include the following: North - Fast food restaurant South - Freeway (SR -60) East - Flood Control Channel West - Residential development 2 Approved Future Development Pursuant to conversations with cities of Diamond Dar and Industry staff, there are three (3) approved future developments in the vicinity of the, project site in the City of Industry These projects are shown in Exhibit E. B Stud Area Roadway System Area of Significant Traffic Im acY Existing roadways in the study area include Lycoming Street, Brea Canyon Road and Golden Springs Drive Lycoming Street is currently a two lane divided roadway, and it is classified as a Collector roadway (64 foot right-of-way). Brea Canyon Road is currently a four lane divided roadway, and it is classified as a Major arterial (100 foot right-of-way) north of Golden Springs Drive and a Secondary arterial (80 foot right-of-way) south of Golden Springs Drive. 15 Golden Springs Drive is currently a four lane divided roadway, and it is classified as a Secondary arterial (80 foot right-of-way) in the vicinity of the project site. The following intersections within the study area have been identified for analysis through discussions with City of Diamond Par staff. Brea Canyon Road (NS) at: ® Lycoming Street (EW) ® SR -60 Westbound Ramps (EW) ® Golden Springs Drive (EW) ® West Project Driveway (EW) SR -60 Eastbound Ramps (NS) at: ® Golden Springs Drive (EW) Northerly Project Driveway (NS) at: ® Lycoming Street (EVV) Exhibit F identifies the existing roadway conditions for study area roadways. The number of through travel lanes for existing roadways and the existing intersection controls are identified in Exhibit F The existing traffic volumes in the area are shown in Exhibit G. 2 Master Plan of Arterial Highways Existing and future roadways are included in the City of Diamond Sar Circulation Element and are shown on Exhibit H. 17 III. PROJECTED TRAFFIC A. Site Traffic 1. Trip Generation Trip generation represents the amount of traffic which is attracted and produced by a development. Trip generation for this project has been based upon the specific land uses which is planned for the development. The proposed project consists of a 166 -room business hotel, three freestanding restaurants and one office/retail building pad. The site is currently occupied with a recreation vehicle storage facility. Trip generation rates for this project are shown in Table 1. The trip generation rates are based upon data developed by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). The current RV storage facility generates nominal traffic. Both daily and peak -hour trip generation for the proposed project are shown in Table 2 The proposed development is projected to generate approximately 3,936 trip -ends per day with 287 vehicles per hour during the AM peak hour and 306 vehicles per hour during the PM peak hour. With pass -by trips for the various uses, the project is expected to generate a total of approximately 1.954 new trip -ends per day with 148 vehicles per hour during the AM peak hour and 157 vehicles per hour during the PM peak hour The traffic study has not taken any credit for the trips generated from the existing RV storage facility. Therefore, this represents a conservative traffic impact assessment. Trip generation for approved future cumulative projects in the area, which are expected to be completed by Year 2004, are shown in Table 3. 2 Tnp ®istribution Trip distribution represents the directional orientation of traffic to and from the project site. Trip distribution is heavily influenced by the geographical location of the site. the proximity to the regional freeway system 21 employment, commercial and community facilities. The directional orientation of traffic was determined by evaluating existing and proposed land uses within the community and existing traffic volumes. Trip distributions for this study have been based upon near-term conditions, based upon those highway facilities which are in place. The outbound and inbound trip distribution patterns for the project are graphically depicted on Exhibits I and J, respectively. The trip distributions for cumulative projects are shown in Exhibit K. 3 Modal Split The traffic reducing potential of public transit has not been considered in this report. Essentially the traffic projections are "conservative" in that public transit might be able to reduce the traffic volumes. Currently, Golden Springs Road is served by the Foothill Transit route 482 buses. 4 Trip Assignment The assignment of traffic from the site to the adjoining roadway system has been based upon the site's trip generation, trip distributions, proposed artena� highway and local street systems. Project related daily traffic volumes and the protect AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movements are shown on Exhibit L. B Future Traffic 1 Openinq Year (2004) Traffic To account for areawide growth on roadways. Opening Year traffic volumes have been calculated based on a 2 percent annual growth rate of existing traffic volumes over a three and -a -half year period (1998.2002). Areawide growth has been derived from the comparison of the 1998 counts conducted by RKJK & Associates, Inc. and 2002 traffic counts conducted for RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. Total growth rate over two years is approximately 4%. 25 A»eawidegrowth Plus cumulative project traffic has been added to existing daily and peek hour traffic wdunnee on surrounding roadways, in addition to traffic generated by the project. Existing traffic volumes are shown on Exhibit Gand they are booed on manual AM and PM peak hour turning movement ununza conducted for RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. in February, 2002. Traffic count worksheets one included in Appendix ''B^ The roadway average daily traffic (ADT) volumes have been estimated by RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.using the hzUmeinQ fnnnu|e for each intersection leg: PMPeak Hour (Approach + Exit Volumes) ^1O=Daily Leg Volume The formula is based on the assumption that 10% of the daily traffic occur during PM peak hour, Exhibit M shows the traffic volumes which can be expected for Opening Year (2004) without project traffic conditions. Exhibit N shows the traffic volumes which can be expected for Opening Year (2OO4) with project traffic conditions. 30 G A. Level of Service at Existing Conditions ICU Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) for existing traffic conditions have been calculated and are shown in Table 4. The ICU are based on manual AM and PM peak hour turning movement counts conducted for RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. in February, 2002 (see Exhibit J). Traffic count worksheets are included in Appendix "B". Table 4 summarizes existing ICU's at the study area intersections with existing lane configurations. As shown on Table 4, the study area intersections are currently operating at Level of Service "D" or better during the peak hours, except for Golden Springs Drive and Brea Canyon Road with existing lane configurations. ICU calculation worksheets are included in Appendix "C". 2 V/C Ratio Table 5 summarizes the existing volume -to -capacity (V/C) ratio of the roaaways in the vicinity of the project site. As shown on Table 5, all the roadway links currently have V/C ratios better than 0.80 except for Golden Springs Drive east of Brea Canyon Road. B Level of Service at Existing Plus Project Conditions ICU Intersection Capacity Utilization ICU for existing plus project conditions have been calculated and are shown in Table 6. As shown in Table 6 the study area intersections are currently operating at Level of Service "D" or better during the peak hours, except for the intersection of Brea Canyon Road at SR -60 westbound ramps. and Brea Canyon Road at Golden Springs Drive. ICU calculations are included in Appendix "C". 33 2. V/C Ratio Table 7 summarizes the existing plus project volume capacity ratio of roadways in the vicinity of the project. As shown in Table 7, all the roadway links currently have V/C ratios better than 0.80 except for Golden Springs Drive east of Brea Canyon Road. C. Level of Service at Openino Year (2004) Without Project ICU ICU for Opening Year (2004) without project traffic conditions have been calculated and are shown in Table 8. Table 8 summarizes ICU's at the study area intersections with existing lane configurations. Opening Year (2004) AM and PM peak hour turning movement volumes without the project are shown on Exhibit M. As shown in Table 8. most study area intersections are projected to operate at Level of Service "E" or worse during the peak hours, with existing lane configurations ICU calculation worksheets are included in Appendix "E". There are three (3) intersections which would require improvements to achieve Level of Service "D" or better for Opening Year 2004 without project as shown in Table B. Potential improvements required to achieve Level of Service "D or better are shown on Table 8. These improvements would include the addition of an additional westbound left turn lane on the SR -60 westbound ramp and a free right turn on southbound Brea Canyon at Golden Springs These additional lanes would require substantial improvements and modification to existing roadway and adjacent land uses, including additional right-of-way. However. it should be noted, that as discussed in the next section of this report, the project does not have a significant impact to either of these two intersections. In order to achieve Level of Service "D" or better at the intersection, significant improvements are required at these two intersections, which would require detailed design evaluation to determine the precise impact to the adjacent land uses. 37 Z V/C Ratio Table 9 summarizes the V/C ratio of the surrounding roadways for the Opening Year (2004) without project traffic conditions. As shown on Table 9. all the roadway links are projected to have V/C ratios better than 0.60 except Brea Canyon Road north of SR -60 westbound ramps, Brea Canyon Road north of Lycoming Street and Golden Springs Drive east of SR -60 eastbound ramps and east of Brea Canyon Road. D. Level of Service at Opening Year (2004) With Project ICU and HCM ICU and HCM (Highway Capacity Manual) intersection delays for Opening Year (2004) with project traffic conditions have been calculated and are shown in Table 10. Table 10 summarizes ICU's and HCM intersection delays at the study area intersections with existing lane configurations and with improvements Opening Year (2004) AM and PM peak hour turning movement volumes with the project are shown on Exhibit N. As shown in Table 10, most of the study area intersections are projected to operate at Level of Service "D" or worse during the peak hours, with existing lane configurations. The improvements required to met Level of Service "D' or better are also shown in Table 10. ICU and HCM calculation worksheets are included in Appendix "F". There are three (3) intersection which would require increments to achieve Level of Service "D' or better for Opening Year 2004 without project as shown in Table 10. Potential improvements require to achieve Level of Service "D" or better are shown on Table 10. These improvements would include the addition of an additional westbound left turn lane on the SR -60 westbound ramp and a free right turn on southbound Brea Canyon at Golden Springs. These additional lanes would require substantial improvements and modification to existing roadway and adjacent land uses. It should be noted, however, that as discussed in the next section that the project does not have a significant impact to either of these two N intersections, In order to achieve Level of Service "D" or better at the intersection, significant improvements are required at these intersections. The improvements necessary to achieve Level of Service "D" or better at the three intersections is as follows: 6',R-60 at: Golden Drive Convert the existing westbound right turn lane to a "free" right turn lane. Brea Canyon Road (NS) at: a Lycoming Street (EW) Stripe an additional southbound through lane on Brea Canyon Road and stripe a westbound left turn lane on Lycoming Street. ® Golden Springs Drive (EW) Convert the existing southbound right turn lane to a "free" right turn lane. Provide northbound right turn overlap phasing and restripe to provide and additional eastbound through lane. As noted on Page 37 of this report, the first and third improvements mentioned above would require significant changes to the existing intersections. However, the project does not have a significant impact to these intersections. 2 V/C Ratio Table 11 summarizes the V/C ratio of the surrounding roadways for the Opening Year (2004) with project traffic conditions. As shown on Table 11, roadway links which are projected to have V/C ratios worse than 0.30 are as follows: ® Brea Canyon Road north of SR -60 westbound ramps ® Brea Canyon Road north of Lycoming Street 43 Golden Springs Drive between SR -60 eastbound ramps and Brea Canyon Road ® Golden Springs ®rive east of Brea Canyon Road R. Project 5igniflcance Impact to Intersections and Roadway Segments Intersections In order for the project to have a significant impact it has to increase the ICU by 0.02. An assessment of the Opening Year 2004 with project intersections level of service with and without the project is shown in Table 12. The project will not have a significant impact to most intersections within the study area. As shown in Table 12, the only intersection which the project would increase the ICU by more than 0.02 is the intersection of Brea Canyon Road and Lycoming Street. This intersection would need modification to achieve Level of Service "D or better during the PM peak hour 2 Roadway Segments In order for the project to cause a significant impact the project has to change the V/C ratio of roadway segments by more than 0.02. A summary or the Opening Year 2004 project significant evaluation is included in Table 13 As shown in Table 13 the project does not contribute a significant traffic impact to roadway segments with the exception of Brea Canyon Road north of SR -60 westbound ramp and Lycoming Street, east of Brea Canyon Road Lycoming Street east of Brea Canyon Road is operating significantly under its design capacity and does not require any improvements. Brea Canyon Road north of westbound ramp. adjacent to the project is over its design capacity of this roadway Restriping Brea Canyon Road to provide three (3) lanes in each direction will mitigate this situation. Additionally, the proposed raised median to be constructed by the project from the westbound ramps to Lycoming Street would control access in this area and further mitigate this situation in conjunction with the restriping to provide these lanes in each direction. 45 F. The project fan share contributions have been calculated for the study area intersections. The project share of intersection improvements hes been based on the proportion of project peak hour traffic volumes contributed to the intersection relative 10the total new peak hour Opening Year (20O4)traffic volumes. Table 14 presents o summary of the project traffic contribution to the study area intersections and also identifies whether the project has a significant impact 0othe intersection. The only intersection which the project has o significant impact that requires improvements is Brea Canyon Road at Lyouxxng Street. The project's fair share percent contribution to this intersection in 17.3% during the AM peak hour and 16.396 during the PM peak hoursTable 15 summarizes the project tnefDn contribution tosignificantly impacted intersections. 51 M, V. RECOMMENDATIONS A. Site Access The Opening Year circulation recommendations are summarized in Exhibit C and Exhibit D. The proposed project will have one access driveway on Brea Canyon Road and one access to Lycoming Street through the existing restaurant. 2 The Brea Canyon access could be a right-in/right-out and left turn access. In order to prevent left turns out of the project on to Brea Canyon Road a raised median is recommended along Brea Canyon Road from the westerly SR -60 ramp to Lycoming Street. The raised median should include a 50 -foot southbound left turn pocket into the proposed Brea Canyon Road driveway. The driveway should have a minimum width of 30 feet and be a curb return type driveway, with a curb return radius of 30 feet. 3 The Lycoming Street driveway should occur at the existing location of the restaurant driveway. It is recommended that stop signs be installed as shown in Exhibit D to better control traffic within the driveway. Both of the proiects driveways should be stop sign controled at Brea Canyon Road and Lycoming Street B Roac]wav Improvements Off -Site For Opening Year (2004) traffic conditions with the project and with existing lane configurations, some of the study area intersections are projected to operate at less than Level of Service "D". The only intersection that the project will have a significant impact is the intersection of Brea Canyon Road at Lycoming Street. In order to mitigate intersection, a westbound left turn lane is required on Lycoming Street to accommodate the AM/PM peak hour traffic volume. The project should provide a fair share contribution of between 16.3 to 17.3% of improvement costs for this modification. The A project will not have osignificant impact toother study area intersections for Year 2004 conditions. The poyao'e namtriping of Brea Canyon Road to three (3) lanes in each direction and construction of a raised median along Brea Canyon Road from the SR -60 westbound ramps to LycnminQ Street will mitigate the project's V/Cratio nfthis roadway segment. 2 On -Site a. Tmffiooigning/shpmg should be implemented inconjunction with detailed construction plans for the project, bSight distances at the project access driveways should be reviewed with respect to City of Diamond Bar sight distance standards in conjunction with the preparation of precise grading and landscape plans C Provide northbound right turn lane into the project driveway nn Brea Canyon Road 52 LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTION ;, r TRAFFIC COUNT WORKSHEETS BUNT TRIM ICU CALCULATIONS - EXISTING L-jr]x7 i��ii m ICU CALCULATIONS - EXISTING FLUS PROJECT ICU CALCULATIONS - OPENING YEAR (2004) WITHOUT PROJECT ICU CALCULATIONS - OPENING YEAR (2004) WITH PROJECT lvmq�vm. \�� �. }� � � \ � trdnqf)nrt,inr)n planniijQ m r,),f;c Pn".ineerinq OLNI" A" rlualiiv StLI(fill, Mr. Allyn Taylor EXTENDED STAY AMERICA, INC. 8407 Cross Country Drive Humble, TX 77346 Subject: Extended Stay America Traffic Impact Analysi Dear Mr, Taylor: RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. is pleased to submit the Extended Stay America Traffic Impact Analysis for the project site located east of Brea Canyon Road between Lycoming Street and State Route 60 (SR -60) westbound ramps in the City of Diamond Bar. This report provides a summary of the findings, analysis procedures and evaluation of the proposed project with respect to on-site and off-site traffic impacts, pursuant to City of Diamond Bar requirements. Based upon this study, the proposed project can be accommodated within the planned circuiation system, if the recommended Improvements are implemented. These re;;Ornmencations are included in the "Recommendations" section of this report. If you have any questions regarding this study, please do not hesitate to call us at (949) 949-08e9 Sincerer,, RK ENGINEERING G Robert Kahn, P. Principal RK: FY: rd/816 JN:0778-02-01 Attachments EXF 1: ,31105 \C� 1 C Cao Xc: Mr. Al Anz, ANZ COMPANY Frank Yeh Transportation Planner 1301 dove street, suite 370 newport beach. California 92660 tel 949,474,0809 fax .949.474 0902 WAN � RK:FY:rd/816 JN:0778-0241 ` i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A. Purpose ofReport and Study Objectives B Site Location C. Study Area and Methodology 1ICU Method 2. HCK8Method 3. Roadway Link VXCRatio D. Project Description E. Principal Findings F. Project Recommendations USETT/NB -----------------. ------------------. 15 A. Land Use 1 Existing Land Uses u. Approved Future Development BStudy Area Roadway System 1 Area cfSignificant Traffic Impact 3. Master Plan ofArterial Highways Ui PROJECTED TRAFFIC .................................................................................... 21 * Site Traffic 1 Trip Generation 2 Trip Distribution u Modal Split 4 Trip Assignment G Future Traffic 1. Opening Year (2OO4)Traffic |VTRAFFIC ANALYSIS ------..................................................................... 33 A, Level ofService atExisting Conditions l. ICU 2. V/CDatiu B. Level Of Service a1Existing P|unr-- Conditions 1 ICU � 2. V/CRado C. Level of Service atOpening Year (2004)Without Project 1 ICU ^` 2. V/CRado D. Level of Service at Opening Year (2004) With Project 1. IDU and HCM 2. V/C Ratio E. Project Significance Impact to Intersections and Roadway Segments 1. Intersections 2. Roadway Segments F. Project Traffic Contribution V. RECOMMENDATIONS..................................................... ................................. 49 A. Site Access E. Roadway Improvements 1. Off -Site 2. On -Site APP�NDI - LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTION......................................................................... A TRAFFIC COUNT WORKSHEETS.......................................................... ICU CALCULATIONS - EXISTING......................................................... ICU CALCULATIONS - EXISTING PLUS PROJECT ................................................... D ICU CALCULATIONS - OPENING YEAR (2004) WITHOUT PROJECT .................... E ICU CALCULATIONS - OPENING YEAR (2004) WITH PROJECT ............................ F A LOCATIONMAP 2 B SITE PLAN O C OPENING YEAR CIRCULATION RECOMMENDATIONS ............ -..... 12 D PARKING LOT RECONFlGURATDW ' -----~--^--------. 13 E CUMULATIVE PROJECTS ........ 16 F EXISTING NUMBER OFTHROUGH LANES AND INTERSECTION CONTROLS ....................................................... 18 G EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES 19 H CITY OFDIAMOND BAR GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT ...................................................................... 20 / PROJECT OUTBOUNOTRIP DISTRIBUTION ...................................... 26 � PROJECT INBOUND TRIP DISTRIBUTION .......................................... K CUMULATIVE PROJECTS TRIP DISTRIBUTION ................................ - PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES ........................................................... � OPENING YEAR (2OO4)VV!THOUT pROJECTTRAFF|CVOLUMES -------------------- 31 N OPENING YEAR (2D04)WITH 1 PRDJECTTR/PGENERATONRATES---------------' 22 2 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION ............................................................. 23 3 CUMULATIVE PROJECTS TRIP GENERATION .................................. 24 4 EXISTING INTERSECTION LEVELS OFSERVICE WITH EXISTING LANE CONFIGURATIONS ....................................... 34 5 EXISTING ROADWAY VOLUME TOCAPACITY RATIO ...................... 35 O EXISTING PLUS PROJECT INTERSECTION LEVELS OFSERVICE _______________________--. 38 7 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT ROADWAY VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIO ............................................................ 38 D OPENING YEAR (2OO )VV|THOUTPROJECT INTERSECTION LEVELS OFSERVICE ............................................... 39 9 OPENING YEAR (20O4)WITHOUT PROJECT ROADWAY VOLUME TOCAPACITY RATIO ........................................ 40 10 OPENING YEAR (2OO4)WITH PROJECT INTERSECTION LEVELS OFSERVICE ............................................... 41 11 OPENING YEAR (2OO4)WITH PROJECT ROADWAY VOLUME TOCAPACITY RATIO ........................................ 43 12 OPENING YEAR (2OO4)PROJECT INTERSECTION LEVELS OFSERVICE SIGNIFICANCE EVALUATION ......................... 44 13 OPENING YEAR (2OO4)PROJECT ROADWAY VOLUME TU CAPACITY RATIO SIGNIFICANCE EVALUATION ............................... 48 14 PROJECT TRAFFIC CONTRIBUTION .................................................. 47 15 PROJECT ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT CONTRIBUTION SHARES EXTENDED STAY AMERICA The purpose of this traffic impact analysis is to evaluate the development of the Extended Stay America project from a traffic; circulation standpoint. Study objectives include (1) documentation of existing traffic conditions in the vicinity of the site; (2) calculation of the existing plus project conditions; (3) calculation of the Opening Year (2004) traffic conditions without and with the project; (4) evaluation of ingress/egress points for the development; and (5) determination of on-site and off-site improvements and system management actions needed to achieve City of Diamond Bar level of service requirements. The project site is located on the east side of Brea Canyon Road between I_vcoming Street and the State Route 60 (SR -60) westbound off -ramp in the City of Diamonc Bar. Exhibit A illustrates the traffic analysis study area which was estaolished in discussions with City of Diamond Bar staff. Tne study area includes the following intersections: Brea Canyon Road (NS) @t. - * t:® Lyccming Street (EW) ® SR -60 Westbound Ramps (EW) ® Golden Springs Drive (EW) ® West Project Driveway (EW) SR -60 Eastbound Ramps (NS) at: ® Golden Springs Drive (EW) EXHIBIT A LOCATION OV 9 2 k{t r, P. 077&-02-01-EX_A engineering EXTENDED STAY AMERICA. DEamond Bar, Caldom�a 2 01 group, Inc, Northerly Project Driveway (NS)at: e LyrommgSUee (EW) The technique used toassess the operation mfanintersection isknown ao Intersection Capacity Utilization (/CU). To calculate an ICU the volume of rnan/c using the intersection is compered with the capacity of the intersection. ICU is usually expressed as a percent. The percent represents that portion ofthe hour required toprnvdeou85d 1 ' en capacity to accommodate all intersection traffic if all approaches operate at oapaoity. Anexplanation ofLevel ofService iaincluded inAppendix 'Y\^ Calculation Method: o Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU)for study area intersections; b. Saturation Flow Rate: Saturation flow value of1.ODOvehicles per lane per hour for through lanes, 1.600 vehicles per hour for single turn lanes and 2.880 for dual turn |oneo� no adjustments are used for protected movements with dedicated |anee(mcJudingboth right and left humo). C Clearance internal A clearance interval factor of 10% (o.10) is applied bothe ICU calculations, d. Level of Service Ranges: The following thresholds are used in assigning o letter value bz the resulting LOS. I e. Peak -Periods: f. Peak -Hour The highest one-hour period in both the AM and PN peak periods, asdetermined byfour consecutive 15-rninutecount periods are used mthe ICU calculations. Both AK4and P/Npeak hours are studied, 9 Peak -Hour Data Consistency: Variations in peak4xour volumes can affect LOS calculations because they vary from day-to-day. Tominimize these variations, no counts are taken on Mondoyu. Fhdayu, holidays or weekends. The traffic count worksheets for this study isincluded inAppendix ^B^ h. Right Turn Movements: Uthe distance from the edge of the outside through lane is at least 19 feet and parking ioprohibited during the peak pehod.right turning vehicles may be assumed to utilize this "unofficial" right tum lane. Othemjae, all right tum traffic is assigned to the through lane. If right tum {one exists, right tum activity is checked for conflicts with other critical movements. It is assumed that right turn movements one accommodated during non -conflicting left bum phases 4 CRITICAL VOLUME TD LM A 0.00'0.80 B 0.61-0.70 C 0.71 -0.80 D 0.81-0.90 E O.Q1 - 1.00 e. Peak -Periods: f. Peak -Hour The highest one-hour period in both the AM and PN peak periods, asdetermined byfour consecutive 15-rninutecount periods are used mthe ICU calculations. Both AK4and P/Npeak hours are studied, 9 Peak -Hour Data Consistency: Variations in peak4xour volumes can affect LOS calculations because they vary from day-to-day. Tominimize these variations, no counts are taken on Mondoyu. Fhdayu, holidays or weekends. The traffic count worksheets for this study isincluded inAppendix ^B^ h. Right Turn Movements: Uthe distance from the edge of the outside through lane is at least 19 feet and parking ioprohibited during the peak pehod.right turning vehicles may be assumed to utilize this "unofficial" right tum lane. Othemjae, all right tum traffic is assigned to the through lane. If right tum {one exists, right tum activity is checked for conflicts with other critical movements. It is assumed that right turn movements one accommodated during non -conflicting left bum phases 4 (e.g., northbound right turns during westbound left turn phase), as well as non -conflicting through flows (e.g., northbound right tum movements and north/south through flows). Right turn movements become critical when conflicting movements (e.g., northbound right turns, southbound left turns, and eastbound through flows) represent a sum of V/C ratios which are greater than the normal through/left turn critical movements. However, ICU method is not an appropriate method for analyzing an unsignalized intersection. Since the intersection of the project driveways at Brea Canyon Road and Lycoming Street are unsignalized intersections, another analysis method is needed. Therefore, the HCM (Highway Capacity Manual) method is also used in this study. The HCM method evaluates the average delay per vehicle at the intersections. The current technical guide to the evaluation of average delay is the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 2000. HCM 2000 defines level of service as a qualitative measure which describes operational conditions within a traffic stream, generally in terms of such factors as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort and convenience, and safety The criteria used to evaluate LOS (Level of Service) conditions vary based on the type of roadway and whether the traffic flow is considered interrupted or uninterrupted. The definitions of level of service for uninterrupted flow (flow unrestrained by the existence of traffic control devices) are: ® LOS "R" represents free flow. Individual users are virtually unaffected by the presence of others in the traffic stream. ® LOS "B" is in the range of stable flow, but the presence of other users in the traffic stream begins to be noticeable. Freedom to select desired speeds is relatively unaffected, but there is a slight decline in the freedom to maneuver. 1.1 ® LOS "C" is in the range of stable flow, but marks the beginning of the range of flow in which the operation of individual users becomes significantly affected by interactions with others in the traffic stream. ® LOS "®" represents high-density but stable flow. Speed and freedom to maneuver are severely restricted, and the driver experiences a generally poor level of comfort and convenience. ® LOS "E" represents operating conditions at or near the capacity level. All speeds are reduced to a low, but relatively uniform value. Small increases in flow will cause breakdowns in traffic movement. ® LOS "F" is used to define forced or breakdown flow. This condition exists wherever the amount of traffic approaching a point exceeds the amount which can traverse the point. Queues form behind such locations. The definitions of level of service for interrupted traffic flow (flow restrained by the existence of traffic signals and other traffic control devices) differ slightly depending on the type of traffic control. The level of service is typically dependent on the quality of traffic flow at the intersections along a roadway. Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 2000 methodology expresses the level of service at an intersection in terms of delay time for the various intersection approaches. The HCM uses different procedures depending on the type of intersection control. Study area intersections which are stop sign controlled with stop control on the minor street only have been analyzed using the unsignalized intersection methodology of the HCM. For these intersections, the calculation of level of service is dependent on the occurrence of gaps occurring in the traffic flow of the main street. Using data collected describing the intersection configuration and traffic volumes at this location, the level of service has been calculated. 0 The level Of services foronOmo-Stnaet mbzp control intersections are defined as follows: In addition to intersection analysis, the roadways in the vicinity of the project site have been analyzed by volume -to -capacity (VYC) ratio. The City of Diamond Bar requires Level of Service "C" (V/C = 0.80) as its evaluation criteria for roadway segment analysis. The following summarizes the daily traffic capacities for different types roadways: OLanes Divided 4Lanes Divided 4 Lanes Undivided 2Lanes Undivided LocalRoad GO,3ODvehicles per day 37.5DOvehicles per day 25.00Uvehicles per day 12.5OOvehicles per day 3. 100 vehicles per day The proposed Project consists of a 06 -room business hotelthree (3) freestanding restaurants and onemMiue�e�i| building pad. The mde'iscurrently occupied with orecreation vehicle storage facility. The site plan for the pn�a^ isiUu�ratedonExh�dB. � 8 M group, inc. 1. The proposed development is projected to generate approximately 3,936 trip -ends per day with 287 vehicles per hour during the AM peak hour and 306 vehicles per hour during the PM peak hour. Taking into consideration pass -by trips for the various uses, the project is expected to generate a total of approximately 1,954 new trip -ends per day with 148 vehicles per hour during the AM peak hour and 158 vehicles per hour during the PM peak hour. 2. For existing traffic conditions, the study area intersections are operating at Level of Service "D" or better during the peak hours, except at Golden Springs Drive and Brea Canyon Road. All roadway links in the study area are currently have V/C ratios better than 0.80 except for Golden Springs Drive east of Brea Canyon Road. 3. For existing plus project conditions, all study area intersections are projected to operate at Level of Service "D" or better with the exception of Brea Canyon Road at the SR -60 westbound ramp which is projected to operate at Level of Service "D" during the AM peak hour and Level of Service "E" during the PM peak hour and at the intersection of Brea Canyon Road, at Golden Springs Drive, which is projected to operate at Level of Service "E" during the AM peak hour and Level of Service "F" during the PM peak hour. 4 For Opening Year (2004) without project traffic conditions all of the study area intersections are projected to operate at Level of Service "E" or worse during the peak hours with existing lane configurations. All the roadway links are projected to have V/C ratios better than 0.80 except for Brea Canyon Road north of SR -60 westbound ramps and to north of Lycoming Street and Golden Springs Drive from SR -60 eastbound ramps to east of Brea Canyon Road. IN 5. For Opening Year (2004) with project traffic conditions, the study area intersections are projected to operate at Level of Service "E" or worse during the peak hours with existing lane configurations with the exception of the project driveways. All the roadway links are projected to have V/C ratios better than 0.60 except the following roadway segments: ® Brea Canyon Road north of SR -60 westbound ramps ® Golden Springs Drive east of Brea Canyon Road 6. The addition of the project traffic produces an increase of more than 0.02 in the ICU value (significant impact) for Opening Year (2004) without project vs. with project traffic conditions at only one intersection. As shown in Table 13, the project does have a significant traffic impact at the intersection of Brea Canyon Road at Lycoming Street. Therefore, the project should contribute to the improvements to that study area intersection. 7. Based on the roadway segment analysis, the addition of the project traffic produces an increase of more than 0.02 in the V/C ratio value (significant impact) for Opening Year (2004) without project with project traffic conditions at one location (Brea Canyon Road north of SR -60 westbound ramps). Therefore, the project creates significant traffic impact at this one roadway segment and the project should contribute to this improvement. 8. For Opening Year (2004) with project traffic conditions, the study area intersections are projected to operate at unacceptable level of service curing the peak hours with existing lane configurations. However, with the recommended street improvements, all the study area intersections are projected to operate at Level of Service "D" or better. Most the roadway links are projected to have V/C ratios better than 0.60 except the following roadway segments, in which they are projected to be over -capacity: ® Brea Canyon Road north of SR -60 westbound ramps to north of Lycoming Street ® Golden Springs Drive between SR -60 eastbound ramps to east of Brea Canyon Road. N 9. Based on the HCm intersection analysis, the unsignalized intersections Of west and north project driveways are projected to operate at acceptable level of service for Opening Year (2004) with project traffic conditions. The Opening Year circulation recommendations are summarized in Exhibits C and D. 1 The proposed project will have one access driveway onBrea Canyon Road and one on Lyooming Street north. The westerly and' /y -- t driveways should bestop-controlled with minimum widths of3O ~ '���� The west project driveway should be restricted to right-in/right-out and left -in access with raised median ohanne|izution along Bnao Canyon Roed Project recommendations are shown in Exhibit C. The north driveway - should be a full auoeua and modified as shown in Exhi�ExhibitDbzavoid the angular intersection with the existing parking lot. 2. The following project should contribute onafair-share basis to the following intersection improvements recommended for the Opening Year conditions (see Exhibit C): For the intersection of Lycoming Street at Brea Canyon Road: 0 Provide a westbound left turn lane 3. Tnafficogning/sthmng Should be implemented in conjunction with detailed construction plans for the project. See Exhibit Dfor nyoo~ uration for the existingparking 4. Sight distance at the pm�ct access driveways should be reviewed with respect to City cfDiamond Bar sight distance standards in conjunction with the preparation ofprecise grading and landscape plans, 11 EXHI 11, IT C OPENING CIRCULATION RECOMMENDATIONS I I i I wnrs r�am'4ASiN:cv�ae roc�inu 0°uw�ra., .. cvao aen,x..nn�is LYCOMING ST. INSTALL RAISED MEDIAN WITH 150 FOOT SOUTHBOUND LEFT TURN LANE INTO PROJECT. CHANNELIZE TO RESTRICT LEFT TURN ACCESS OUT OF PROJECT SR" .� cRN'Y LEGEND: = PROJECT SITE = TRAFFIC SIGNAL » = NUMBER OF LANES D = DIVIDEC U = UNDIVIDED = RIGHT WRIGHT OUT PLUS LEFT IN ACCESS = FULL ACCESS N INSTALL WESTBOUND LEFT TURN LANE. RECONFIGURE PARKING LOT ACCESS TO ELIMINATE ANGULAR MERGE WITH EXISTING EXIT. SEE EXHIBIT D ®� GRYANDER DR. SITE EC engineering EXTENDED -01 STAY Di AY AMERICA, amontl Bar, Caldorma �— 12 group, ince 7LCOMING -Ia i i L� I � �1 PAR 47L "� " PARCE "B" LEGEND. ' =STOP SIGN N 0778.02-Ot.EX C EX7ENDE0 STAY AMERICA, Diamontl gar, Caltlomia engineering 3 group, inc. 14 The site is currently a recreation vehicle storage facility. Adjacent uses include the following: North - Fast food restaurant South - Freeway (SR -60) East - Flood Control Channel West - Residential development Pursuant to conversations with cities of Diamond Sar and Industry staff, there are seven (7) approved future developments in the vicinity of the project site in the City of Industry. These projects are shown in Exhibit E. Existing roadways in the study area include Lycoming Street, Brea Canyon Road and Golden Springs Drive. vcnmin �trP�> is currently a two lane divided roadway, and it is Classified as a Collector roadway (64 foot right-of-way). Brea Canvnn an� is currently a four lane divided roadway, and it is classified as a Major arterial (100 foot right-of-way) north of Golden Springs Drive and a Secondary arterial (80 foot right-of-way) south of Golden Springs Drive. 15 CUMULATIVE PROJECTS 0778.02-01 EX_E engineeringO1 a EXTENCEC STgv gMERICA, D�amontl Bar, Ca6lornia 16 group, inc, Gdd=—'4��Ve is currently a four lane divided Madway, and it is classified as a Secondary arterial (80 foot right-of-way) in the vicinity of the project site. The following intersections within the study area have been identified for analysis through discussions with City of Diamond Bar staff: Brea Canyon Road (N8)at: ° LycominQStreet (EW) ° SR-GOWestbound Ramps (EVV) * Golden Springs Drive (EVV) ° yVeo1 Project Driveway (EVV) 3R-GOEastbound Ramps (NS)at: ° Golden Springs Drive (EW) Northerly Project (NS) at: ° LyoomingStreo (EVV) Exhibit Fidenbfieuthe existing roadway conditions for study area roedveays The number of through travel lanes for existing roadways and the mdo�nu - intersection controls are identified in Exhibit F. The existing traffic volumes m mmeamaare shown /nExhibit Q. Existing and future roadways are included in the City of Diamond Bar Circulation Element and are shown onExhibit H. 17 0778-02-01-EX n EXTENDED s engineering amgroup, inc., EXHIBIT H CITY OF DIAMOND BAR GENERAL PLAN CIRCUUTfilt '10 -F -L DIAMOND BAR C=UNE-fS DL-�-NTONTD BAR SPHERE OF IN-FLUF-Nj FREEWAY LEI MAJOR ARTERLAI, ® n SECONDARY ARTERLkL N �EXTENpED STAY AMERICA. Diamond Bar, California 0778 -02.01 -EX H engineering 20 group, inc. A. Trip generation represents the amount of traffic which is attracted and produced by a development. Trip generation for this project has been based upon the specific land uses which is planned for the development. The proposed project consists of a 166• -room business hotel, three freestanding restaurants and one office/retail building pad. The site is currently occupied with a recreation vehicle storage facility. Trip generation rates for this project are shown in Table 1. The trip generation rates are based upon data developed by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). The current RV storage facility generates nominal traffic. Both daily and peak -hour trip generation for the proposed project are shown in Table 2. The proposed development is projected to generate approximately 3,936 trip -ends per day with 287 vehicles per hour during the AM peak hour and 306 vehicles per hour during the PM peak hour, With Pass -by trips for the various uses, the project is expected to generate a total of approximately 1,954 new trip -ends per day with 148 vehicles per hour during the AM peak hour and 157 vehicles per hour during the PM peak hour. The traffic study has not taken any credit for the trips generated from the existing RV storage facility. Therefore, this represents a conservative traffic impact assessment. Trip generation for approved future cumulative projects in the area, which are expected to be Completed by Year 2004, are shown in Table 3. i Trip distribution represents the directional orientation of traffic to and from the project site. Trip distribution is heavily influenced by the geographical location of the site, the proximity to the regional freeway system, 21 ITE AM PM OODE LAND USE UNITS` IN OUT IN OUT DAILY 312 Business Hotel Rooms 0.34 0.24 0.37 0.25 7.27 831 Qualit Restaurant TSF 0.00 0.00 5.02 2.47 69.95 832 Hjah Turnover Restaurant TSF 4.82 4.45 6.52 4.34 130.34 Fast Food Restaurant with 834 Drive-Thru TSF 25.43 24.43 17.41 16.07 496.12 820 Retail TSF 0.63 0.40 1.80 1.94 42.92 710 General Office TSF 1.37 D.19 0.25 1.24 11.D1 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trio GeneraPion, Sixth Edition, 1997. 2 TSF = Thousand Square Feet jVktabiesvk800Vk896tC 22 JN:077B-02-Cl � LAND USE SE �QUANTITY � UNITS' IN C)I1T tN .,®UT 1 DAILY Business Hotel Rooms 39 28 43 29 Qualit Restaurant 7.0 TSF 843 Pass -b Trip Percenta e 45% - 0 - 35 17 630 (Net) 0 -23 -11 -40E — ® ° 12 6 22c High Turnover Restaurant 4.3 TSF 21 19 28 19 560 Pass-bv Trip Percentage 35% -13 12 (Net) -18 12 -364 Fast Food Restaurant with 7 7 90 7 196 Drive-Thru 3.4 TSF 86 83 59 55 9,687 Pass -b Trip Percenta e 40% -56 (Net) -54 -38 -36 -1096 30 29 21 19 590 Retail 4.0 I TSF 3 2 7 Pass-bv Trio Percenta e 65%1 8 172 (Net -2 -1 -5 -5 _112 general Off;ce 4.0 TSF 1 5 1 3 3 60 Ve: Pro!ec' Traff;c 1 1 5 44 1 83 65 89 68 1.954 ' TSF = Thousand Square Feet i:lrktables\rk8001rk816t5 23 JN:0778.02-01 TABLE3 CUMULATIVE PROJECTS TRIP GENERATION ITE PEAK -HOUR AM PM --- CODE' CODE' LAND USE SIZE IN OUT IN OUT I DAILY 150 Majestic Realty, Bldgs 10-14,16-25 2.346.32 ` 868 188 282 915 11,638 150 Koll Plantation III 260.40 96 21 31 102 1,292 140 Formosa Textiles GRAND TOTAL 91.56 2698.28 51 16 25 43 350 1,016 2241 338 1,060 13.2791 SourceInstitute of Transponation Engineers (ITE), Trio Generation, Sixth Edition, 1997. Majestic Realty has a total size of 5,865.80 TSF. Assuming buildout at 5 years, in two years project size is 40% of total. I . WktablesVk BOOT, ke!Btb - 24 JN 0798-02-0' employment, commercial and community facilities. The directiona, orientation of traffic was determine e al atfiff F Trip distributions for this study have been based upon near-term conditions, based upon those highway facilities which are /n place. The outbound and inbound trip distribution patterns for the project are graphically depicted on Exhibits | and J.respectively. The trip distributions for cumulative projects are shown hnExhibit K. The traffic reducing potential ofpublic transit has not been considered in this report Essentially the traffic projections are "conservative" in that public transit might be able to reduce the traffic volumes. Currently, Golden Springs Road iuserved bythe Foothill Transit route 482buses. The assignment of traffic from the site to the adjoining roadway system has been based upon the site's trip gennnabon, trip diatribubonu, proposed arterial highway and local street systems. Project related da/|y traffic volumes and the project AM and pKX peek hour intersection turning movements are shown onExhibit L Toaccount for armawidegrow1honroadways, Opening Year traffiovolumes have been calculated based on a 2 percent annual growth rate of existing traffic volumes over three and-a'ha/yyear Period (1998-2002). Anmowide growth has been derived from the comparison of the 1998 counts conducted by RKJK &Aomodateo' Inc. and 2OU2traffic counts conducted for RKENGINEERING GROUP, INC. Total growth rate over two years is approximately 4%. 25 EXHIBIT I EXHIBIT i G °»e-°z_°,.Ex K engineering EXTENO0D STAY AMERICA, �iamontl Bar, Caldarnia 28 — Em group,ineeri. EXHIBIT L PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES Areawide growth has been added to daily and peak hour traffic volumes on surrounding ruadwmys, in additkmUo traffic generated bythe project. Existing traffic volumes are shown on Exhibit G, and they are based on manual AM and PM peak hour turning movement counts conducted for RK ENGINEERING GROUP. INC. in February, 2002. Traffic count worksheets are included in Appendix ^B" The roadway average daily traffic (ADT) volumes have been estimated by RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC, using the following hmnnu|e for each intersection leg: PMPeak Hour (Approach + Exit Volumes) ~1O=Daily Leg Volume The formula is based on the assumption that 10% of the daily traffic occur during PMpeak hour. Exhibit M shows the traffic volumes which can be expected for Opening Year (2004) without project traffic conditions. Exhibit N shows the traffic volumes which can be expected for Opening Year (2004) with project traffic conditions. all EXHIBIT M OPES a= ING AR (2004) WITHOUT PROJECT. VOLUMES 077802-01 EX M EXTENDED STav AMERICA, Diamontl Bar, Caldorma engineering 31 M group, inc. --186/186 r --2J3 2311231 r 23141 7N �N n ® N ;D fD Mc - W^ "45126 n m A J I L x®1951169 6662- 1 1 r 2321230 cmc �i � NOP NrtD td c )Qt � LYCOMING ST 8.3 4.6 0 d? 13 6O 6 3 —186/186 x 2/3 23112397�� 23/41 x LORYANDER DR SITE J � � iA5 911632 "-' Pm 0532 FJ N\N Q'- Q�5�8�3^ = PROJECT SITE 10120 = AM/PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES 7.3 = AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (1000'5) = AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (1000'5) AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (1000'S) N 0778-02-01-EX_N engineering EXTENDED STAY AMERICA. Diamontl Bar. California 32 group, Inc. ICU Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU)for existing traffic conditions have been calculated and are shown inTable 4. The ICU are based onmanual AM and PM peak hour turning movement counts conducted for RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. in February, 2002 (see Exhibit J). Traffic count worksheets are included in Appendix "B". Table summarizes existing ICU's at the study area intersections with existinglane ne oonfigunaUonn. As shown on Table 4, the study area intersections are currently operating atLevel ofService °O^orbetter during the peak hours, except for Golden Springs Drive and Brea Canyon Road with existing lane configurations. ICU calculation worksheets are included in Appendix "C". 2, V/C Ratio Table 5 summarizes the existing volume-to-capacity(//C) ratio of the roadways in the vicinity of the project site. As shown on Table 5.all the roadway links currently have VYC ratios better than 0.80 except for Golden Springs Drive east ofBrea Canyon Road /CU Intersection Capacity Utilization ICU for existing plus project conditions have been calculated and are shown in Table 6. As shown inTable 6the study area intersections are currently operating at Level of Service ^D^ or better during the peak houra, except for the intersection of Brea Canyon Road at SR -60 westbound ramps, and Brea Canyon Road at Golden Springs Drive. ICU calculations are included in Appendix "C". IN When a ngCl tum 15 designated, the lane can either be stnpen 01 unstnped To function as a right tum lane there must be sufficient wrath for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes L = Let:. T = Through; R = Right: > = Right Tum Dvenap: 1 = Improvemenl ICU = intersection Capacity U6112aton ' TS = Traffic Signal CSS = Cross Street Stop Shared through, ngnt and left turn lane 34 jlrktables1rk800kk815tb JN 0778.02-C'. INTERSECTION APPROACH LANES' -� NORTH- SOUTH- EAST- WEST- LEVEL OF INTERSECTION SR -60 EB Ramps (NS) at TRAFFIC CONTROL' BOUND L T R BOUND L T R L BOUND T R L BOUND T R ICU, AM PM SERVICE AM PM • Golden Sor:ncs Dnve (EW) Brea Canyon Road (NS) at TS 0 1 0 11.5° 0 0.5' 1 2 1 1 2 1> ®" 0.665 0.831 B D • Lycoming Street (EW) • SR -60 WB Ramps (EW) • Golden Sonngs Drive (EW) TS TS TS 1 2 0 2 2 0 9 2 9 1 2 0 0 2 1 2 2 1> 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0.5° 2 9 9 1 1 0 1.5° 2 9 0.774 0.883 0.149 0.894 0.944 9.093 C D D D E F When a ngCl tum 15 designated, the lane can either be stnpen 01 unstnped To function as a right tum lane there must be sufficient wrath for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes L = Let:. T = Through; R = Right: > = Right Tum Dvenap: 1 = Improvemenl ICU = intersection Capacity U6112aton ' TS = Traffic Signal CSS = Cross Street Stop Shared through, ngnt and left turn lane 34 jlrktables1rk800kk815tb JN 0778.02-C'. TABLE5 EXISTING ROADWAY VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIC) STREET L_ ROADWAY LINK Golden Springs Dr. West of SR -60 EB Ramps SR -60 ES Ramps to Brea Canyon Rd East of Brea Canyon Rd. area Canyon Rd. North of Lycoming St. North of SR -60 WB Ramps North of Golden Springs Dr. South of Golden Springs Dr ycoming St. East of Brea Canyon Rd. West of Brea Canyon Rd. 35 J, Ma b les\rk 8 00\rk8 161b JN:0778-02-01 DAILY I VOLUME -TO- LEVEL OF TRAFFIC LCAPACITY RATIO SERVICE 0.49 A 28,600 0,77 C 2,300 0.86 D 27,300 0,73 C 26,300 0.75 c 25,600 0.69 B 4,600 0.66 8 3,300 0.26 A 7,900 0.63 B EXISTING PLUS PROJECT INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE When a right turn is designated. the lane can either be striped or unstnped. To function as a right tum lane there must he sufllclent mcitri for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes L = Let T = Tnrougn, R = Right: > = Right Tum Overlap, 9 = Improvement ICU = Intersection Capacity Utilization TS = Traffic Signai CSS = Cross Street Stop Shared through, ngnt and left tum lane 36 jltrktablesvk8000k816tb JN:0778-02-01 INTERSECTION APPROACH LANES' NORTH- SOUTH- EAST- WEST- LEVEL OF INTERSECTION SR -60 EB Ramps (NS) at: TRAFFIC CONTROL' BOUND L T R BOUND L T R BOUND L T R L BOUND T R ICU' AM PM SERVICE AM PM • Golden Spnngs Drive (EW) TS M 0 1 0 1.5' 0 0,5' 1 2 1 1 2 9> 0.673 0.844 8 p Brea Canyon Road INS) at ` • Lycoming Street (EW) • SR -60 WB Ramps (EW) • Golden Springs Drive (EW; TS TS TS 1 2 0 2 2 0 1 2 1 1 2 0 0 2 i 2 2 9> 0 9 1 0 0 0 0 0.5® 2 2 1 1 9 9 0 1.5' 2 9 0.898 O.B66 0.960 0.863 0.912 1.098 p p D E E F When a right turn is designated. the lane can either be striped or unstnped. To function as a right tum lane there must he sufllclent mcitri for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes L = Let T = Tnrougn, R = Right: > = Right Tum Overlap, 9 = Improvement ICU = Intersection Capacity Utilization TS = Traffic Signai CSS = Cross Street Stop Shared through, ngnt and left tum lane 36 jltrktablesvk8000k816tb JN:0778-02-01 Table 7summarizes the existing Plus project volume capacity ratio of roadways in the vicinity ofthe projects sight. As shown in Table 7, all the roadway links currently have WC ratios better than 0.80 except for Golden Springs Drive east mfBrea Canyon Road. /CU /CU for Opening Year (2OO4)without project traffic conditions have been calculated and one shown in Table 8, TeNo 8 summarizes ICU's at the study area intersections with existing lane configurations. Opening Year (2004) AM and PM peak hour turning movement volumes without the project are shown onExhibit M. Asshown inTable 8. most study area intersections are projected tooperate at Level of Service ''E^ or worse during the peak houm, with existing lane configurations. ICU calculation worksheets are included inAppendix "E" V/C Ratio Table 9 summarizes the V/C ratio of the surrounding roadways for the Opening Year (2O04)without Project traffic conditions. Aeshown onTable y all the roadway links are projected tuhave V/Cratios better than 0�8 except Brea Canyon Road north of SR -60 westbound ramps Brea Con'»" -n Road north of Lycoming Street and Golden Springs DrDrive - 'east of S''~D eastbound ramps and east o/Brea Canyon Road. ICU and HCM ICU and HCM (Highway Manual) intersection delays for OpeningingY*ar (2004) with Project traffic conditions have been calculated and areohnwn in Table 10. Table 10 summarizes /CU's and HCm intersection 37 TABLE 7 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT ROADWAY VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIO) STREW ROADWAY LINK DAILY TRAFF IC VOLUME -TO- CAPACITY RATIO I I LEVE! OF SERVIC= Golden Springs Dr. West of SR -60 EB Ramps SR -60 EB Ramps to Brea Canyon Rd, 18.258 29,444 0.49 0.799 A C N Brea Canyon Rd. East of Brea Canyon Rd. North of Lyccming St. 32,396 27,691 0.86 I 0.74 D C North of SR -60 WB Ramps 29,706 0.79 C North of Golden Springs Dr. 26,620 0.71 C South of Golden Springs Dr. 24,678 0.66 g Lyccming St. East of Brea Canyon Rd. 1>'Jest of Brea Canyon Rd. 4,316 7,998 0.35 0.64 A g 38 j:\rktabiesvkB00irk8761b JN:0778-02-0, TABLE 8 OPENING YEAR (2004) WITHOUT PROJECT INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE INTERSECTION APPROACH LANES' NORTH- SOUTH- EAST- WEST- LEVEL OF TRAFFICBOUND BOUND BSERVICE OUND _ BOUND ICU, c INTERSECTION CONTROL L T R 7 R L T R L T R AM PM AN! PM Z-60 EB Ramps (NS) at Golden Spnngs Drive (EW) TS 0 1 0 1 0.5' 0.5" 1 '2 1 1 2 7> 0.727 0.928 C E - wi Improvements 0 1 0 1 0.5 0.5 1 2 1 1 2 1» 0.727 0.652C B _ ea Canyon Road (NS) at Lyccm;ng Street(EV� TS 1 2 1 1 2 1 0 1 9 0 1 1 0.893 0.986 D - v.' improvements E 1 2 t 1 3 0 0 1 9 0 9 1 0.893 0.835 D D SR -60 WB Ramps (Ew) TS 2 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0.5` - w; Improvements - 2 2 0 0 0.924 0.996 E E 2 1 0 0 0 1.<5 0 9.5° 0.808 0.820 D D Golden Springs Drive (EV\') TS 1 2 1 2 2 1> 2 29 9 - w'Improvements 2 2 1> v 2 1 9.008 9.205 F F 2 1» 2 2 9 9 2 9> O.SD2 D876 D D tYnen a n.h; iura is ces,gna!ec the lane can either be stnoed or unstrrel To function as a right turn lane there must be Su". Cie -I wlcln for r;c.^I :urnin'g vendles to travel outside lite through lades _ Le'! ' = Tnrc❑7c. R = R:gn: > = Right Turn Ovenap. 1 = Improvement: » = Free Right Tum IC'.. = Intersection Capacity Utilization TS = Traffic Signa, CSS = Crass Street Stop Snared through. rlgnt and left turn lane 39 j trBta Olesrk 800,rk816tC JN.077B-J2-C' 7 4J jArkIable s%rk 800'rk 816th JN 0778-02.0' TABLE 10 OPENING YEAR (2004) WITH PROJECT INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE 1Vnen a r.g,. turn a designated, the lane can eltner be striped or unstnoeo To function as a right turn lane there must be su!i�aeni wct'i to' rngry turning ver,cles to travel outside the through lanes _ _ e'! T - Throucr. R = Right > = Right Turn Overlap; 1 = improvement » = Free Right Tum w = intersechoi'. Capacii,v Utilization For unsignalized intersections, delay in seconds is shown. TS = Traffic Signal CSS = Cross Street Stop Shared througn, right and left turn lane lrktabies11k8001rk816tL 41 JN INTERSECTION APPROACH LANES' INTERSECTION EB Ramps (NS) at. TRAFFIC CONTROL' NORTH- BOUND L T R SOUTH- BOUND_ T R - L `- EAST- BOUND T R L WEST- BOUND ICU' T R I AM PM --� LEVEL OF SERVICE AM PIM Golden Golden Springs Drive (EW) -w! Improvement rea Canvc❑ Road (NS) al TS TS 0 1 0 0 1 0 1.5` 9.5' 0 0.54 0 0.51 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 1> 9>= 0.735 0.735 0.949 0.661 C E C B wcoming Street (EW) -wr Imnrovemen; SR -6C t'.'B Ramps (EW) -w! Imorovemeni Goiden Springs Drive (EW) -w! Improvemen: West Dnvay ew Nonn Drweway (NS) a! I TS TS TS TS TS TS CSS 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 0 2 2 0 1 2 1 2 2 1> 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 2 2 2 2 1 3 0 2 1 3 0 2 1> 2 1— 2 1> 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 i 3 0 2 9 0 9 0.5° 1.5° 9 1 9 9 1 0 0 2 2 2 1 1 1.5° 1.5° 1 1 1 0.936 0.887 0.940 0.775 1.024 0.8930.877 99.8 9.029 0.034 1.094 0.055 9190 92.4 E F D D E F C F F D D C B -comm.- Street fEW; CSS 9 2 1 2 2 1> 1 2 2 1 11 2 1 92.0 92.0 B 8 1Vnen a r.g,. turn a designated, the lane can eltner be striped or unstnoeo To function as a right turn lane there must be su!i�aeni wct'i to' rngry turning ver,cles to travel outside the through lanes _ _ e'! T - Throucr. R = Right > = Right Turn Overlap; 1 = improvement » = Free Right Tum w = intersechoi'. Capacii,v Utilization For unsignalized intersections, delay in seconds is shown. TS = Traffic Signal CSS = Cross Street Stop Shared througn, right and left turn lane lrktabies11k8001rk816tL 41 JN delays at the study area intersections with existing lane configurations and with improvements. Opening Year (2004) AM and PM peak hour turning movement volumes with the project are shown on Exhibit N. As shown in Table 10, most of the study area intersections are projected to operate at Level of Service "D" or worse during the peak hours, with existing lane configurations. The improvements required to met Level of Service "D" or better are also shown in Table 10. ICU and HCM calculation worksheets are included in Appendix 7". 2. V/C Ratio Table 11 summarizes the V/C ratio of the surrounding roadways for the Opening Year (2004) with project traffic conditions. As shown on Table 11, roadway links which are projected to have V/C ratios worse than 0.50 are as follows: ® Brea Canyon Road north of SR -60 westbound ramps ® Brea Canyon Road north of Lycoming Street ® Golden Springs Drive between SR -60 eastbound ramps and Brea Canyon Road Golden Springs Drive east of Brea Canyon Road �. •. - t1. a.1. 1 0 9 1-R�r•.. _... ntersections In order for the project to nave a significant impact it has to increase the ICU by 0.02. An assessment of the Opening Year 2004 with project intersections level of service with and without the project is shown in Table 12. The project will not have a significant impact to most intersections within the study area. As shown in Table 12, the only intersection which the Project would increase the ICU by more than 0.02 is the intersection of Brea Canyon Road and Lycoming Street. This intersection would need modification to achieve Level of Service "D" or better during the PM peak hour. 42 L_STREET ROADWAY LINK Golden Springs Dr. West of SR -60 EB Ramps SR -60 EB Ramps to Brea Canyon Rd Cast of area Canyon Rd. Brea Canyon Rd North of Lycoming St. North of SR -60 WB Ramps North of Golden Springs Dr. South of Golden Springs Dr. Lycoming St, East of Brea Canyon Rd. West of Brea Canyon Rd. rvulat)ies srX800 rX 816th 43 JN.0778-02-0; VOLUME -TO - DAILY CAPACITY LEVEL V TRAFFIC RATIO S SERVICE 19,200 0.51 A 32,300 0.86 D 34,600 0.92 E 32,800 0.87 D 34,500 0.92 E 28,300 0.75 C 26.100 0.70 B 4,600 0.37 A 8,300 0.66 8 OPENING YEAR (2004) PROJECT INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE SIGNIFICANCE EVALUATION ICU = Intersection Capacity U111¢a0on 2 Delay in Seconns jirkla ble s`.rk 800\rk 816 t 44 JN:0776-02-01 OPENING YEAR 2004 OPENING YEAR 2004 WITHOUT PROJECT WITH PROJECT PROJECT HAS A LEVEL OF LEVEL OF CHANGE IN SIGNIFICANT ICU' SERVICE ICU' SERVICE ICU IMPACT INTERSECTION AM PM AM PM AM PM - AM PM AM PM AM PM SR -60 ES Ramps (NS) at - • Golden Springs Drive (EW) 0.727 0.928 .. E 0.735 0.941 C E 0.008 0.013 No No Brea Canyon Road WSI at ° Lycoming Street (EW) 0.893 0.986 D E 0,936 1.021 E F 0.043 0.035 Yes Yes ° SR -60 WB Ramps (EW) 0.924 0.996 E E 0.940 1.014 E F 0.016 0.018 No No • Golden Springs Drive (EW) 1.000 9.205 F F 1.024 1.210 F F 0.016 0.005 No No ° West Driveway — -- •- — 19.82 12.42 C B NA NA North Driveway (NS) at • Lycoming Street (EW) -- -- -- — 12.02 12.02 B B NA NA ICU = Intersection Capacity U111¢a0on 2 Delay in Seconns jirkla ble s`.rk 800\rk 816 t 44 JN:0776-02-01 In order for the project to cause a significant impact the project has to change the V/C ratio of roadway segments by more than 0.02. A summary or the Opening Year 2004 project significant evaluation is included in ®cable 13. As shown in Table 13, the project does not contribute a significant traffic impact to roadway segments with the exception of Brea Canyon Road north of SR -60 westbound ramp and Lycorning Street, east of Brea Canyon Road. Lycoming Street east of Brea Canyon Road is operating significantly under its design capacity and does not require any improvements. Brea Canyon Road north of westbound ramp, adjacent to the project is over its design capacity of this roadway. However, the proposed raised median to be constructed by the project from the westbound ramps to Lycoming Street would mitigate this situation. The project fair share contributions have been calculated for the study area intersections. The project share of intersection improvements has been based on the proportion of project peak hour traffic volumes contributed to the intersection relative to the total new peak hour Opening Year (2004) traffic volumes. Table 14 presents a summary of the project traffic contribution to the study area intersections and also identifies whether the project has a significant impact to the intersection. The only intersection which the project has a significant impact that requires improvements is Brea Canyon Road at Lycoming Street. The project's fair share percent contribution to this intersection is 17,3% during the AM peak hour and 16.31/10 during the PM peak hours. Table 15 summarizes the project traffic contribution to significantly impacted intersections. AM TABLE 33 OPENING YEAR (2004) PROJECT ROADWAY VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIO SIGNIFICANCE EVALUATION 46 I: V ktable 5Vk80Grk8 161D JW077a-02-01 OPENING YEAR 2004 WITHOUT I OPENING YEAR 2004 WITHOUT I PROJECT PROJECT CHANGEINI VOLUME -TO- 1VOLUME-TO- VOLUME TO SIGNIFICANT DAILY CAPACITY LEVEL OF DAILY CAPACITY LEVEL OF CAPACITY TRAFFIC STREET ROADWAY LINK TRAFFIC RATIO SERVICE TRAFFIC RATIO SERVICE RATIO IMPACT Golden Springs or. West of SR -60 EB Ram s 19,200 0.512 A 19.200 0.512 A 0.000 No SR -60 EB Ramps to Brea Can on Ra. 31,700 0.845 D 32.300 0.861 D 0.016 No East of Brea Canyon Rd. 33,900 0.904 E 34.600 0.923 E 0.019 No Brea Canyon Rd. North of L corrin SL 32,400 0.864 D 32,800 0.875 D 0.019 No North of SR -60 WB Ram sl 33,100 0.883 E 34,500 0.920 E 0.037 Yes North of Golden Springs Dr, 28,200 0.752 C 28,300 0.755 C 0.003 No South of Golden S rin s Dr. 26,000 0.693 B 26,100 0.696 B 0.003 No Lycommg St. East of Brea Can on Rd. 3,600 0.288 A 4,600 0.368 q 0.100 Yes West of Brea Canvon Rd 8,200 0.656 B 8,300 0.664 g 0.008 No 46 I: V ktable 5Vk80Grk8 161D JW077a-02-01 PROJECT TRAFFIC CONTRIBUTION \rklao!e5 rk80C''1k8161, JN C'78.02 -O' Imersecuor INTERSECTION N1S ROADWAY ENV ROADWAY PEAK EXISTING BUILDOUT HOUR TRAFFIC TRAFFIC NEW PROJECT PROJECTI TRAFFIC TRAFFIC PERCENT Requires MitigalionlProject has a for Year 2004 Significant wlProiect � Imoaet Brea Canyon RC, Lycoming St. AM 5.732 6,705 973 168 17.3% Yes Yes P1,11 6,288 7,380 1,092 178 16.3% Yes Yes ISR -60 EB Ramps Golden Springs Dr. AM 4,682 5.193 511 98 19.2°/ No No PM 5,878 6,477 599 106 17.7% Yes No Brea Canyon RC. SR -60 WB Ramps AM 6,760 7.728 968 214 2.1% Yes No PM 7,054 8,120 1,056 230 21.6% Yes Na (Brea Canvon RC I IGoiden Sonr.�is Dr ANI 9.0681 9.8" 809 124 15.% 3 Yes No DNI 11,1801 12.131 951 136 14.3% Yes No \rklao!e5 rk80C''1k8161, JN C'78.02 -O' Existinc ________________________m_-__e_______m_____________m_____----_______-___-_______ AM Fri Feb 22, 2002 11:28:01 Page 3-1 Extended Stay America Traffic Impact Analysis Diamond Bar, California _______________________________________________________________.._-_--____--_____ Existing Conditions Level Of Service Computation Report ICt' 1(Lcss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersec__cn 42 Brea Canyon Rd / Golden Springs Dr Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.944 Loss T__,- ,seci: 10 (Y,R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optima_ Gcle: 128 gsoutY:« Leve' 0£ Service: E A:.prcac:.: No= Bound Bound East +Bound ++«+«««West «�» +Bound movemec- ------------ L - , - R L - T - R L - T - R '--------------- L - T - R Cor.trc:: ,-----_--`--------------------- Pratecced Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Ovl Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: ------------ - 0 2 0 1 --------------- 2 0 2 --------------- 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 Vo'ume AM ------------- Base '.,._. 203 366 2B2 187 423 526 312 491 191 232 700 621 1.00 1.00 1.00 ..00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 203 366 282 187 423 526 312 491 191 232 700 621 Use- Ac_ 1.00 :.CC 1.00 '_.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 F:-'- Ad- 1-02 -.•. •. 1.00 _.00 :.00 x.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P:' l'c.c--: 2C3 366 282 187 423 526 312 491 191 232 700 621 e Rdcct '. __.. C D C 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 Redcce_i '._._. ._= 366 282 187 423 526 312 491 191 232 700 621 F=•- r. :.DC -.CC 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1!L- - 1.02 _,C- 1.00 i.00 :.cc _.00 ,.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2C7 366 2B2 -______ ---_e 187 423 _______________ 526 312 491 191 232 700 621 . lo'.. _______________ --------------- I ��- --•-.- -=.-- 'r-- i6CC 1600 16C0 16CC 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 :.DD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.OD 2.00 1.0C 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.Do ----- --_ ------- - ---- .-. .. .. 16C2 -- -- ------------ 320D 3200 --------------- 160C 3200 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 u0.lc O.06 C.13 0.33 0.10 0.15 0.12 0.14 0.22 0.39 Traff_>: 2001 Dowlino Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP TABLE 15 PROJECT ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT CONTRIBUTION SHARES INTERSECTION FAIR SHARE r :1 ]/:S ROADVWVA�Y E/W �ROA�DW�AY� PERCENTAGE ��6rea Canyon Rd. �Lycoming St. 16.3% to 17.3% 1I 48 JN 0778.02-01 A. Site Amess The Opening Year circulation recommendations are summarized in Exhibit C and Exhibit D. The proposed project will have one access driveway on Brea Canyon Road and one access to Lycoming Street through the existing restaurant. 2. The Brea Canyon access could be a right-in/right-out and left turn access. In order to prevent left turns out of the project on to Brea Canyon Road a raised median is recommended along Brea Canyon Road from the westerly SR -60 ramp to Lycoming Street. The raised median should include a 150 - foot southbound left turn pocket into the proposed Brea Canyon Road driveway. The driveway should have a minimum width of 30 feet and be a curb return type driveway, with a curb return radius of 30 feet. 3 The Lycoming Street driveway should occur at the existing location of the restaurant driveway. It is recommended that a portion of the restaurant driveway parking area be reconfigured as shown in Exhibit "D" to better channelize traffic within the driveway. Both of the projects driveways should be stop sign controled at Brea Canyon Road and Lycoming Street. For Opening Year (2004) traffic conditions with the project and with existing lane configurations, some of the study area intersections are projected to operate at less than Level of Service "D". The only intersection that the project will have a significant impact is the intersection of Brea Canyon Road at Lycoming Street. In order to mitigate intersection, a westbound left turn lane is required on Lycoming Street to accommodate the AM/PM peak hour traffic volume. The project should provide a fair share contribution of between 16.3 to 17.3% of improvement costs for this modification. The 49 project will not have asignificant impact toother study area intersections for Year 2004 conditions. The pnojeoCo construction of nsin*d median along Brea Canyon Road from the S�8 westbound m�uwe�oramps toLycomingStreet will help toMitigate the project's V8Cratio ofthis roadway segment, e. Traffic signing/striping should be implemented in conjunction with detailed construction plans for the project. b� Sight distances at the project uoceoo driveways should be reviewed with mmpeoL to City of Diamond Bar sight distance standards in conjunction with the preparation of precise grading and landscape plans. M LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTION LEVEL Of SERVICE - DEFINITIONS® Service General Freeways Level DePinitlen Arterials Criteria for measurement; Criteria for measurement: Density (cars per lane -mile) Average travel speed (mph) Free flow. Individual users Are virtually unaffected by the pres- ence of others in the traffic stream. Freedom to select de- sired speeds and to maneuver within the traffic stream Is ex- tremely high. The general level of Comfort and convenience pro- vided to the motorist, passenger, or pedestrian is ezcedent. Stable flow, but the presence of other users in the traffic stream begins to be noticeable. Freedom to select desired speeds is rela- tively unaffected, but there Is a slight decline in the freedom to maneuver within the traffic stream from LOS A. The level of comfort and convenience provided is somewhat less than at LOS A, because the presence of others In the traffic stream begins to affect individual behavior. Stable flow, but marks the beginning of the range of flow in -rich the operallon of Individual users becomes sIgnlric&,Illy affected by Interactions with Others In the traffic stream. The selection of aped Is affectad by the presence Of others, and maneuvering within the traffic stream require® sudtantlal vigilance on the part of the user. The general level of comfort and convenience declines noticeably at this level. Free flow operations. Average travel speeds near 6o mph gen- erally prevail on 70 -mph freeway elements. Vehicles are almost completely unimpeded In thele ability to maneuver within the traffic stream. The average spacing between vehicles Is about 440 ft, or 22 car -lengths, with a maximum density of 12 cars/ ml/In. The effects of minor inci- dents or breakdowns are easily Absorbed at this level. Although they may cause a deterioration In LOS in the vicinity of the inci- dent, standing queues will not form, and traffic quickly returns to LOS A on passing the dis- ruption. Reasonably free-flow conditions, and speeds of over 57 mph are maintained on 70 -mph freeway elements. The average spacing between vehicles is about 260 It, or 17 oar -lengths, with is maximum density of 20 cars/mi/In.The ability to maneuver within the traffic stream is only alightly restric- ted. The effects of minor inci- dents and breakdowns are still easily absorbed, though local deterioration in service would be more severe than for LOS A. Stable operations, but flows approach the range In wtdeh small Increases In flow will cause substantial deterioration in service. Average travel speeds are still over 54 mph Freedom to maneuver within the traffic stream Is noticeably restricted at LOS C, and lane changes require additional care and vigilance by the driver. Average spacings are In the range of 175 ft, or 9 car - lengths, with is maximum density Of 80/car3/ml/In. Minor Inoldents MAY still be absorbed, but the local deterioration In service will be substantial. Queues may be expected to form behind any significant blockage. Additional vigilance by driver required for cafe operation. Primarily free flow -operations at average travel speed usually within 90 percent of the free flow speed. Vehicles are completely unimpeded In their ability to maneuver within the traffic stream. Stopped delay at Sig- nalized intersections is minimal. Unimpeded operations at average travel speeds usually within 70 Percent of the tree flow speed. The ability to maneuver within the traffic stream Is slightly restricted and stopped delays are not bothersome. Stable operations. Ability to maneuver and change lanes In lnldblock locations may be more restricted than In LOS B, and longer queues and/or adverse signal coordination may contribute to lower average travel speeds of about So percent of the average free flow ®peed. high-densdty, but sits flow, Speed and freedom to ...anouver are severely restricted, and the driver or pedestrian experiences a generally poor level of comfort and convenience. Small increases in traffic flow will generally cause operational problems at this level. Operating conditions at or near the capacity level. All speeds are reduced to a low but relatively uniform value. Freedom to man- euver wittun Eric traffic stream is extremely difficult, and it 1s generally accomplished by forcing a vehicle or pedestrian to "give way" to accommodate such man- euvers, Comfort and convenience levels are extremely poor, and driver or pedestrian frustration Is generally high. Operations at this level are usually unstable, because smell increases In flow or minor Perturbations within the traffic stream will cause breakdowns. Level -of-service F. Forced or breakdown flow. This condition exists wherever the amount of traffic approaching a point exceeds the amount which can traverse the point. Queues form behind such locations. Arrival flow exceeds discharge flow. Borders on unstable flow, In t range, ®mall Increases In flow cause substantial deterioration In service. Average travel speeds of 46 mph or more Can still be maintained on 70 -mph freeway elements. Freedom to maneuver within the traffic stream Is severely limited. Even minor incidents can be expected to create substantial queuing, because the traffic stream has little space to absorb disruptions. Average spacings are about 125 ft, or 0 car-]engttw, with a maximum density of 42 Cars/Mt/lm The tsoundary between LOS D and LOS E describes operation at capacity. Operations in this level are extremely unstable, because there are virtually no usable gaps In the traffic stream. Vehicles are spaced at approximately Ho ft, or 4 car -lengths, at relatively uniform headways. This, however, represents the minimum spacing at which stable flow can be accommodated. Any disruption to the traffic stream, such as a vehicle entering from a ramp, or a vehicle changing lanes, causes following vehicles to give way to admit the vehicle. At capacity, the traffic stream has no ability to dissipate even the most minor disruptions. Any Incident can be expected to produce a serious breakdown with extensive queuing. The range of flows encompassed by LOS E Is relatively small compared to other levels, but reflects a substantial deterioration in service. Maneuverability within the traffic stream is extremely limited. Average travel speeds at capacity are approximately 30 m pn. Level F describes forced or breakdown flow. Such conditions generally exist within queues forming behind breakdown Points. Breakdown occurs when the ratio of actual arrlval flow rate to actual capacity or the forecasted flow rate to estimated capacity exceeds 1.00. Operations at such a point will generally be at or near capacity, and downstream operations may be better as veNcles pass the bottleneck (assuming that there are no additional downstream Problems). The LOS F operations observed within a queue are the result of a breakdown or bottle- neck at a downstream point. ®puree: ®Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209" Trpnsnnrtatlnn R"s ereh %ard. washin®inn TI.O.. 1985 Borders on a range on widen small Increases In flow may malice aubatantlel Increases In approach delay and, hence, decreaaae In arterial speed. This may be due to adverse signal prolineslor„ Inappropriate signal timing, hlQn volumes, or some comtimatlon of these. Average travel speeds are about 40 percent of free flow speed. Significant approach delays and average travel speeds of one-third the free flow speed or lower. Such eperatians are caused by some combination or adverse Progression, high signal density, extensive queuing at critical Intersections, and inappropriate signal timing. Arterial flow at extremely low speeds below one-third to one- quarter of the free flow speed Intersection congestion to likely at critical signalized locations, with high approach delays resulting. Adverse progression Is frequently a contributor to this condition. TRAFFIC COUNT WORKSHEETS SOUTHLAND CAR COUNTERS VEHICLE AND MANUAL COUNTS N -S STREET: 60 EB RAMPS DATE 6/26/01 C11 -v =�i• IUi la E -W STREET GOLDEN SPRINGS D DAY TUESDAY Intersection C PROJECT:: 0691;C D01 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND RECEIVING X ;( x x NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL V,' •� ,l_„ LANES. 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 2 1 1 2 6:00 AM P---- 6:15 AM 6:30 AM 645AM 7:00 AM 1 4 1 86 0 8 49 60 0 1 120 128 45•' 7:15 AM 5 2 2 85 0 5 50 100 1 0 133 114 50:' 7.30 AM 6 4 1 91 C 4 48 94 0 0 193 1: S6•I 7.45 AM 5 4 0 119 0 19 51 109 4 2 223 °-' 64.'. 8.00 AM 6 3 6 '114 2 21 45 93 1 0 224 C.:' 50 8 15 AM 6 4 3 102 1 7 48 81 6 0 180 8:1 52 d.30 AM 7 11 2 105 1 18 45 77 2 1 196 8U 55; 845AM 10 4 5 8.5 1 16 64 76 0 1 1013 Sts ,q•. 900AM, 915 AM 9:30 AM 9 45 AM 10.00 AM 10 15 AM 10 30 Ary. 10 45 AM 11:00 AN' 11 15 AN! 11 30 AM 11 45 AM TOTAL NL N7 NR SL ST SR EL El ER WL W' JvR TOTAI VOLUMES= 46 36 2C 75- 9; 41,690 14 5 a;C i4� 1 AM Peak Hr Begins at 720 AM PEAK VOLUMES = 23 15 ic 43- 51 20-- 377 1 82(, :'3•t1 ADDITIONS SIGNALIZED SOUTHLAND CAR COUNTERS VEHICLE AND MANUAL COUNTS N -S STREET 60 EB RAMPS UAIE 6126101 CITY, POMONA E -W STREET GOLDEN SPRINGS D DAY TUESDAY PROJECT# 069300011, NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUNI' ADDITIONS SIGNALIZED NL NT NR SL ST SP EL LT ER WL W'. WR fig LANES 0 1 0 C I 2 1 1 2 1 --- —� 1:00 PM 1:15 PM 1.30 PM 1 45 PM 2:00 PM 2 15 PM 230 P,1 2 45 PM 3.00 P.1 3 15 PA1 3 30 Pf.' 345 P.; 4 06 Pr.' 9 7 2 53 2 8 77 1$0 5 7 129 130 66[, a 15 P" 8 7 1 60 1 12 43 175 2 2 126 105 s42 4 30 P1,! 14 13 4 50 1 12 76 217 3 3 131 162 8e 4 4s F!.' 18 7 2 63 2 14 64 192 2 2 152 17;' 5 GO .' 15 13 6 58 7 53 215 9 9 130 206 2; 16 10 3 61 0 11 67 220 6 4 156 204 5> 65 1 12 71 214 5 5 154 200 a ` 52 0 9 52 194 3 4 140 185 1,61 0:� P'.' 5 P. b. X b45 Pr.' IC1A TL-�%•� •� N 7 NR SL ST 51 EL ET ER WL WT WR VOLUbM1E3 = �,� 7n 2? 46. 8 85 503 1607 35 36 1118 137' 41; PM Peas, r "c-, ns al 445 Pt. - -PEAK PEAK VOLUMES = 67 39 15 247 n 44 255 841 22 20 592 7113 ADDITIONS SIGNALIZED SOUTHLAND CAR COUNTERS VEHICLE AND MANUAL COUNTS N -S STREET: BREA CANYON RD. DATE: 02/12102 CITY: DIAMOND BAR E -W STREET: GOLDEN SPRINGS DAY: TUESDAY PROJECT# 0318003A NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 6:00 AM 6:15 AM 6:30 AM 6:45 AM 7:00 AM 51 66 52 34 94 137 58 103 49 57 157 139 7:15AM 48 87 61 43 106 125 70 114 38 63 196 172 997 7:30 AM 57 95 79 50 111 118 81 118 46 65 184 164 1123 7:45 AM 53 103 68 53 115 132 86 143 51 54 172 158 1168 8:00 AM 45 81 74 41 91 151 75 116 56 50 148 127 1188 8:15 AM 41 68 51 33 87 140 69 95 59 46 139 105 1055 8:30 AM 43 59 32 30 70 119 51 81 47 39 121 116 933 845 AM 38 53 29 35 63 97 70 62 42 34 92 108 808 9:00 AM 723 9:15 AM 9.30 AM 9:45 AM 10:00 AM 10 15 AM 10.30 AM 10 45 AM 11 00 AM 11 15 AV 11.30 AN 11'45 AM TOTAL NM_ NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL VOLUMES= 376 61 446 319 737 1019 560 832 388 408 1209 1089 7995 AM Peak Hr Beam; a'. 715 AM PEAK VOLUMES = 203 365 282 187 423 526 312 491 191 232 700 627 4534 ADDITIONS SIGNALIZED SOUTHLAND CAR COUNTERS VEHICLE AND MANUAL COUNTS N -S STREET: SREA CANYON RD. DATE: 02/12102 CITY: DIAMOND BAR E -W STREET GOLDEN SPRINGS DAY: TUESDAY PROJECT# 0318003P NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES 1 2 0 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 1:00 PM 1:15 PM 1.30 PM 1:45 PM 2:00 PM 2:15 PM 2.30 PM 2.45 PM 3:00 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 3 45 PM 4:00 PM 75 96 79 56 92 127 34 202 61 51 96 42 415 Pr.: 83 107 84 43 87 106 47 198 59 56 119 56 1011 4 30 Po -f 91 129 89 60 95 118 53 236 72 63 143 63 1045 445PM 90 131 96 82 123 141 59 249 78 61 164 69 1212 5 0o PM 89 142 104 76 158 160 50 274 81 69 187 78 1349 5.15 Phi 73 139 98 69 139 136 55 227 75 58 158 70 1468 5.30 Pr: 8C 127 111 92 207 164 51 246 83 71 177 67 1297 5a 6 111 88 54 91 98 46 237 68 57 138 1a7s 6.00 PP.' 51 1104 6:15 Pt.' 6 30 Pf,' 6 45 Pt, TOTAL VOLJMES N_ NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL = 652 98_ 749 532 992 1050 395 1869 577 486 1182 496 9962 PM Peak Hr Bec is at 445 PM PEAK VOLUMES- 338 539 409 319 627 601 215 996 317 259 686 284 5590 ADDITIONS SIGNALIZED SOUTHLAND CAR COUNTERS VEHICLE AND MANUAL COUNTS N -S STREET: BREA CANYON RD. DATE: 02!12102 CITY: DIAMOND BAR E -W STREET: LYCOMING ST. DAY: TUESDAY PROJECT» 0318001A NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANES NL 2 NT 2 NR 0 SL 1 ST 2 SR 0 EL 0 ET 1 ER 0 WL 0 WT 1 WR 0 TOTAL 6:00 AM 6:15 AM 6:30 AM 6:45 AM 7:00 AM 54 232 16 1 144 8 10 4 47 39 11 2 568 7:15 AM 63 320 23 4 152 14 23 6 39 42 10 6 702 7:30 AM 7:45 AM 8.00AM 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 69 82 95 74 63 317 329 281 257 218 15 15 7 12 15 4 6 4 3 3 141 144 123 115 126 15 25 28 17 11 20 11 19 10 13 8 20 16 12 2 32 66 86 57 38 39 37 23 35 30 12 37 14 12 8 6 6 2 4 3 678 776 698 608 530 8 45 AM 61 244 10 4 118 10 16 3 29 28 9 2 534 9:00 AM 915AM 9:30 AM 9'45 AM 10:00 AM. 10.15 AM. 1030 Ah' 1045 AM 1 1 .33 AV 11 15 AM 11 30 AM 11 45 Ar. TOTAL VOLUME; N. 56' NT 2198 NR 113 SL 29 ST 1063 SR 128 EL 122 ET 71 ER 394 WL 273 WT 113 WR 31 TOTAL 5096 AM Peak Hr Begins at 715 AM PEAK VOLUMES = 309 1247 60 18 56C 82 73 50 223 141 73 20 2856 ADDITIONS SIGNALIZED SOUTHLAND CAR COUNTERS VEHICLE AND MANUAL COUNTS N -S STREET: BREA CANYON RD, DATE: 02/12/02 CITY: DIAMOND BAR E -W STREET LYCOMING ST. DAY: TUESDAY PROJECT# 0318001E NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANES NL NT NR 2 2 0 SL 1 ST 2 SR 0 EL 0 ET 1 ER 0 WL WT 0 1 WR p TOTAL 1:00 PM 1:15 PM 1.30 PM 1:45 PM 2:00 PM 2 15 PM 2:30 PM 2 45 PM 3:00 PM 3 15 PM 3:30 PM 3 45 PAA 4 00 PM 4:15 P,1 4.30PM 4"45PM 5.00 PM 5 15 P!J 30 Pl,< a P' 5 ' 6.G: i Ph' 38 173 11 55 195 18 47 212 25 52 199 32 45 241 37 63 218 26 39 234 34 187 30 9 7 4 3 8 11 16 20 218 181 194 257 382 221 41222 175 9 10 19 19 27 12 20 17 18 16 14 27 12 25 16 9 11 10 7 15 12 21 14 51 43 50 47 61 46 67 48 29 21 28 27 28 23 36 20 8 7 4 4 9 10 27 11 4 4 4 2 3 2 8 5 576 570 613 663 884 656 941 593 6:15 PV 6 30 Ph,? 6 45 P!,' TOTAL VOLUMES= N- NT NR 3-7 1659 213 SL 78 ST 2D40 SR 138 EL 145 ET 99 ER 413 WL 212 WT 80 WR 32 TOTAL 5496 PM Peak Hr Beqi-s a: 445 PM PEAK VOLUMES - 230 892 129 38 1272 8G 78 55 221 114 50, 15 3944 ADDITIONS SIGNALIZED S0uTHLAND CAR COUNTERS VEHICLE AND MANUAL CQUNTS N-5 STREET- BREA CANYON RD. DATE: 02/12/02 CITY; DIAMOND SAM E -W STREET SR -60 W8 ON/OFF RAMPS DAY• TUESDAY pRojEc-fa 0318002P NL NT NA SL Sr SA EL E7 EA WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 2 2 2 1 0.5 0 0.5 1W I'm 1:15 pm 1,30 PM 1.4s PM 2100 PM 2:15 Pm 2.30 PM 2.45 PM 100 PM 3115 PM 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 4;00 PM 66 119 228 73 57 2 116 603 416 PM 76 132 184 64 55 0 142 w 430 PM B4 151 208 60 68 0 138 710 445 PM. 91 160 272 76 76 1 120 607 5 co Pm 107 176 330 92 70 0 143 927 5 15 PM 96 157 244 76 81 1 160 117 5130 PW Be 140 387 98 88 D 165 976 6A5 PM 72 138 179 61 54 0 124 029 6,00 PM 8:15 PM 8*30 PM 6.45 PM WL WT -WR 'TOTAL VOLUMES 666 1182 0 0 2039 Oil 0 0 0 649 4 1117 5187 PM PosK H, Bogl,s at 4A5 P" PEAK VOLUMES - 385 642 0 0 1242 344 0 0 0 315 2 897 3527 ADDITIONS SIGNALIZED 80UTKLAND CAR COUNMe VEHICLE AND MANUAL COUNTS N-6 57REET BREA CANYON RE), DATE: 02/12/02 CITY: DIAMOND BAR E -W STREET SA -80 Wo ON/OFF RAMpS DAY! TUESDAY PI10JEC44 0318002A WE ®OUPdO LANES NL NT NR 2 2 SL ST SIR EL ET WL : 1 WT INA TOTAL 2 0.5 o 0.5 6:0o AM 6:15 Am 6:30 AM 6.46 AM 7:00 AM 111 153 106 39 7:15 AM 122 207187 46 69 0 139 707 7:30 AM 129 271 170 37 87 0 195 844 7'48 AM 131 228 204 41 go 0 187 o4i 0:00 AM v 102209 32 93 0 203 898 9 15 AM Be 159 187 26 70 0 198 707 Bao AM 71 135 162 38 04 0 182 ?D4 645 AM 76 176 143 35 so 0 160 GZ2 9'00 AM 62 0 136 629 9:15 AM 9:30 ANI a'45 ANA 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 1 D.30 AM 10 45 Ak, 11 CO AM 1' 15 A.Y 1' 30 AV 1'45 A%' I IAL N 1; N!!! i i i i N '-;:::111 - immiM, ST SR EL ET �WRTOTAL VOLJMES® 623 1449 0 0 107 WT 294 0 0 0 610 0 1399 0042 AM Poe, — Bag,,al 715 AM ,'EAK VOLUMES. 479 826 0 0 779 158 0 0 0 357 0 7413 3380 ADDIT:ONS SIGNALIZED ICU CALCULATIONS - EXISTING Existing AM Tue Feb 19, 2002 15:30:06 _______________________ ___ _________________________________ Page 4-1 Extended Stay America Traffic Impact __________________ Analysis Diamond Bar, California Existing Conditions Level ________________________ ________________ Of Service Computation R®nor: ICU »1(Loss vas»Cycle »Length «1k)»Method (Base Volume Alternative) late««e#.«L0«FwY Ea«««»aLDL / Gc'_der.» Springs »Dro-vL.o-»«««.L«L««v»«.�«.«.,,,,. Cycle (sec): 100 ®»»»»»Critical »Vol./Ca (X) Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R . 4 sec) Average Delay (see veh): / D 66° Optimai Cycle: 46 xac%acxx eve.»C«»Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East «Bound Movement: - T - ' R L - T West Bound ------------`---��---------------I--------------- - R Control: Split Phase lit Phase Split Protected --- i Rights: Include Include Protected Min. Green: C D 0 Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 1 0 1! D 0 0 0 ------ o l 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 Volume Module: ____ _______________ Base Vol: 23 15 10 433 3 51 202 377 11 Growth Ad,: _.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-001.00 1.00 2 820 394 initial Bse: 23 15 10 433 3 51 1.00 1.00 1.00 Use: Ad3: x.00 .x.00 1.00 202 377 11 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2 20 94 PHF Adj: 1.00 _.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1600 1300 PHP Volume: 23 15 10 1.00 433 1.00 1.00 1.00 Reduce Vol: 0 0 3 51 202 377 11 2 820 394 Reduced Vol: 23 15 10 0 0 D 433 3 0 0 0 PCE Adj: ..00 _.00 1.00 51 2020 3770 11 1.O0 1.00 2 820 394 MLF Ad'.: _.00 ,.DO -.00 ..CO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.01) 1.00 1.00 F1na: Vo-.. 23 15 10 _.00 _.00 1.00 =.00 1.00 x.00 1.00 1.0c ---___ ------ ---------------' 433 ? 5: 202 377 I1 2 620 394 Satura'-ICD:� 7 -DI Mcdc'_e. --- I--------------- sat/-a:�e; '6C- :6C_ 16CC Ac 'u 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 =._. ..00 Lanes. _ - 1.00 2.oC.DO I -- cc 1.00 . 00 1.OD 1.00 1600 1.00 -"- --- C,Z: F_na: Sa_.. ,r- 50i.. 33. :.75 0.01 0.2: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 �, 2845 20 335 1600 3200 1600 - 1600 3200 1600 Caoaci:•, A alvs_s Mcd le - �--------------- --------------- Vol/Say: C.03 C -IL Move -z ..., C.15 0.15 0.15 C.13 0.12 0.01 ..». 0.00 0.26 0.25 Traffix 7._.1115 (C! 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RX ENGINEERING GROUP Existing AM ______________a.,__-oe__________-----_--_______-____-__-___--__m_-_ Tue Feb 19, 2002 15:30:06 Page 6-1 Extended Stay America Traffic Impact Analysis Diamond Bar, California _______e____________________________________________________ Existing Conditions Level Of Service Computation Report «« «+«««ICU !(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) > te*section «n.,,«<n+«w«no««+w«+++w«o«ww.,w«own>www+++wwoww0000wwwo+wowmw+owww«wn+ow« 43 Brea Canyon. Rd / 6C Fwy W Ramps Cycle (sec;: 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (%): 0.849 Loss Time (sec): 10 (YtR = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal«^Acle: 80 Level Of Service: w+n+«««.woo«o+.w«onwow++wnnwwwmo+++wwoow+ow+wwwoow+owwowwwww+++ww«n D Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound n+ Movemen -: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L ------- - T - R Control: Protected _ Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Riehts: Include Include Include Include Min, Green: 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 2 0 2 0 0 --------------- 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 II-------------- 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 Volume .Module: -II--------------- II--------------- � Base Vc_: 479 826 0 0 779 156 0 0 0 Grcwtr. Ad, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 357 0 1.00 1.00 783 1.00 Bse: 479 826 0 0 779 156 0 0 0 User Ad_.: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 357 0 1.00 1.00 783 1.00 F''.- Ae_- 1.00 -,.CC 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PH- Volume: 479 826 0 0 779 156 0 0 0 Recce Vc:: D 0 C 0 0 0 357 0 783 ..ecrcec Vol. 479 826 0 0 0 D 0 779 156 0 0 0 0 0 ..00 '.00 1.00 0 ..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 357 0 1.00 1.00 783 1.00 p-^a- "c- _.00 - -00 OC 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ------------ 475 826 0 ----------- ------------------- 0 779 156 0 0 D 357 0 783 I--------------- `a= --.__6^:' _6 CC 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 -.CC :.00 1.00 1.00 _.Cc1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.63 D.00 ..37 0 ----I 0 3200 1600 0 0 0 ---------------------------- 1002 0 2198 Ca cac__ :,aa: ys_s Mccule �, - �I---------------i vc-, tea- 0.010 0.00 ,C.24 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.36 Traf'=', 7.5.'-11= icl 2001 Dowling Asscc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP Existing Am ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Tue Feb 19, 2002 15:30:06 Page 7-1 Extended Stay America Traffic impact Analysis Diamond Bar, California Existing Conditions _______________________________________________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report ICU !(Loss as Cycle Length W) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection 44 Brea Cyn / Lycoming Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.774 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R = 4 see) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal cycle: Gi Level Of Service: C Approac-, Nor--!,. Bou,,Id South Bounc East Bound West Boun4 Movement : L - 7 - R L T R L T ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- Permitted Permitted Permitted I --------------- Permitted Ria ht s Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes, ------------ 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 I --------------- --------------- --------------- Volume Module: 11 --------------- Base Vol 309 1247 60 18 560 e2 73 60 223 141 73 20 Growth Ad-: -.00 :..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1E1CIal ase: 309 1247 60 18 56C 82 73 60 223 141 73 20 User Ac]: 11.0c 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P- A--: :.0c :.Dc 1.00 1.0c 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 60 1B 56C 82 73 60 223 141 73 20 Vz- C 0 C 0 0 0 "C- 37' 1247 60 18 560 82 73 60 223 141 73 20 P r: - . I- - . 0C 1.00 1.0c 1. 00 1.00 1 .00 1 . 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Ac- � .D -.00 1.00 1.00 '-.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ------- --a_.,- 309 1247 60 12 560 82 73 60 223 --- ----------- ---- 141 73 20 Sat - -- a -= ;,,,.----------I --------------- h e --------------- S.t'-ane -c.._ 1600 160C 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 ^-- ne -.0c 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - 1 OC 2.00 1.CO C-55 0.45 1.00 0.66 0.34 1.00 za �dca 160C 1600 3205 1600 878 722 1600 ---------------.I---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1054 546 1600 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ................. 3' 04 D®0: C.17 Q�- C OE C.08 0. 14 0.13 0.13 0.C1 Trnffi>: -z -= i,7. 2001 Dowlinc Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP Existing PM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tue Feb 19, 2002 17:41:16 Page 4-1 Extended Stay America Traffic Impact Analysis Diamond Bar, California -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Existing Conditions Level of Service Computation Report I= l(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersect' -on 41 60 Fwy East Ramps / Golden Springs Dr cycle ;set): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.831 Loss Time !sec): 10 (Y+R 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh); xxxxxx 00-ima- Cvcie: 74 Level Of Service: D Al2oroa=: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound MoVemen- -------------------------- L - T - R --------------- L - T - R contrQI: l� --------------- Split Phase Split Phase Protected --------------- Protected Rights: Include Include Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 11 0 0 1 0 1! 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 -------------- ------------- 11 --------------- 0 11 --------------- 11 Volume Module: pN,, --------------- Base Vol, 67 39 15 247 4 44 255 841 22 20 592 793 G-U'U- Ad: 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hse: 67 39 15 247 4 44 255 841 22 20 592 793 User Ad-: i.0-- 11.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P'- ;;C-; 1.0c �.00 -1.00 i.00 1.00 3-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.00 P - 67 35 15 247 4 44 255 641 22 20 592 793 Rech_ Vc- G G 0 C C 0 0 0 Redcce,-4 6- 39 15 247 4 44 255 841 22 20 592 793 PC-- Ac-- -c' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 11.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 V-- i'oc .01 1.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ------------ 67 39 15 247 4 44 255 B41 22 --------------- --------------- 20 592 793 Flo, --------------- Uodule --------------- 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 -.C;, 1.00 1.00 i.00 -00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 LLr,eS '.32 C.--- 1-6- 0.03 0.30 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.0c ---------- - BE, 1 196 2679 43 477 1600 3200 1600 --------------- --------------- --------------- 1600 3200 1600 z 1 XOC-7 e. C.09 0.09 C-16 0.26 0.01 0.01 0.19 O.So Tr3f�-.: I '-' 7 - ' -5 (C) 200" Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP Existing PM ___--e-----------------------------------------®__--_--___---_--_-__--_ Fri Feb 22, 2002 11:30:11 Page 3-1 Extended Stay America Traffic Impact Analysis Diamond Bar, California _---__-._------------------------------e__-------_-----____----___-_-_--__- Existing Conditions Level Of Service Computation Retort (Lossas Cycle .<..«.e.1CU !(Loss as Length s%)pMethod (Base Volume Alter at.ve% intersect,or. a2 Brea Canyon Rd / Golden Springs Dr « ..�.... Cycle isec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.093 Loss Time (sec): 10 (YrR = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Op...a», Cycle: >..ffi.W..®0.>..»..�,....«.¢ Level <.O..Service: Approach: North Bound >n.re�,.,,,...na...�.w,....... South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - 7 - R L - T - R L - T L - ---------- --------------- !i -------- - T - R Control: Protected I I---------------Il- Protected Protected Protected __ Rights: include Ov- Include include Min. Green: 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: _ 0 2 0 1 ------------ ---------------II---------------I!--------- 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 G 0 Volume Module: PM Base Vol: 33E 539 409 319 627 601 215 996 317 259 686 264 Groat, Ad': _.CC :.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 In.tia- 2se: 33B 539 409 319 627 601 215 996 317 259 686 284 User Ad, ...,._ _.00 1.00 1.00 1.0c 1.00 1.00 1.00 _.DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHT Ad- _.CC -.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 _.00 1.00 1.00 1.Co 1.00 1.00 ,285 PH- Vclume: 33� 539 409 319 627 6C' 215 996 317 259 686 ...00 Reduct Vol: _ 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Recused Vo_. = 539 409 319 62- 601 215 996 317 259 686 C 284 Ad_ _.CC _.0- 1.0c _.00 i.01 ..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ...00 ^7� _ -.Q- _.00 1.00 1.00 i.00 ,.CO i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 �P ina- .c-- 33-- 535 409 ------------ --- 315 62- 631 275 996 317 --------------- 259 686 286 sa[..ra__,,..------ ---------------!I ---------------� :6C- 1600 1600 1600 16CO 1600 1600 1600 1600 160C 1600 1.00 1.06 '_.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .-..0.00 2.00 2.00 '.00 2.00 2.0C• _.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 -••�- u_.. -.. _.: 32„_ 1600 ------------ ------ 3200 320C 1600 32CC 3206 1600 � 1600 3200 1600 - - V�.- S== •- �_ �._' C.26 ..._C C.2C C.38 0.C7 0.31 0.2C 0.16 0.21 0.18 Tra`_i-,x 7..._._5 iC; 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RF ENGINEERING GROUP Existina PM Tue Feb 19, 2002 16:00:45 Page 6-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Extended Stay America Traffic Impact: Analysis Diamond Bar, California Existing Conditions -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1fLoss as Cycle Length Is) Method (Base Volume Alternative) interseczior, 43 Brea Canyon Rd / 60 Fwy W Ramps Cycle (sec!: 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.894 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx optimal Cycle: 97 Level Of Service: D AT:crnac�- Nc=h Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Mcveme= L - T - R L - - R L T R L T R ------------ ! --------------- 11 --------------- H --------------- 11 --------------- cor-.iro-': Protected Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Riahr s: include Include Include Include M -,n Green: 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 ------------ i Module --------------- 1I --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- Volume : PM Base Vol: 3E5 642 0 0 1242 344 0 0 0 315 2 597 Growt!". Ad:! J.Co :.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Bse 385 642 0 0 1242 344 0 0 0 315 2 597 Jsri Ac-': 1.010 '-.CC 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PN' Ad-, :'00 11.01 1.00 :.00 -.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 363 642 C 0 1242 344 0 0 0 315 2 597 0 0 0 0 0 32- 642 0 0 1242 344 0 0 0 315 2 597 1.0- :.GC "-.00 1.00 1.00 1.0C 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I I -0, -.00 1.0c I 1.00 1.00 11.00 1.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'c'. 38� 642 0 0 1242 344 C) 0 0 315 2 597 ------------ --------------- ---------------- --------------- --------------- 71o" mc-�'Llp! 16C2 1EC2 16CO 1600 1600 160D 1600 1600 1600 1600 IGOO 1600 C' 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.oc 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 C' C 2r C.00 2.CC 1-00 0-00 O -CO 0.00 0.69 0.01 1.30 S---- 32CZ 3-2000 3200 1600 0 0 0 1103 7 2090 --------------------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- 6 CC 0.00 C.39 0.22 C -OC 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.29 ................ ra-' 7 � 5 200' Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP Existing PM Tue Feb 19, 2002 16:00:45 ________________________ _____________________________ Page 7-1 Stay America Traffic Impact Analysis Diamond Bar, California Existing Conditions _________________________ _____________ Of Service Computation Report ICU !(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) Interseczjc�: #q Brea Canyon Rd/Lycoming St Cycle (sec): 100 critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.863 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (,Sec/veh): XXXXXX OpLama2 Cycle: 84 Level Of Service: e& Approach; North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L T R L -------- --------- Control: Permitted Permitted Per -mitred --------------- I Rights: include Include Include Permitted Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 Include Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 ------------ --------------- 0 --------------- Vol .ume Module: PM --------------- --------------- Base Vol; 20C 892 129 38 1272 so 76 55 221 11450 Gro,,h Ad7: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0() 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 15 1.00 In-'tlal Bse 200 892 129 38 1272 80 78 55 221 114 50 User Az!-: -OC 1.00 PH7 AJ- i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1-00 _.00_.00 1.0c P,'-!- Vc-ume: 1.00 1.00 1.CC 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 20C B92 129 Reauz:t vc-: 38 1272 8D 78 55 221 114 50 is C 0 0 Reduce--; Vc- 20C 892 129 0 C 0 381272 8C 78 SS F=L Ad- -.0c 1.00 ' 221 1.00 1.00 1.00 -00 !.CC 1.00 114 so 1.00 1.00 15 1.00 N-- Ac- 1.00 1.00 1.0c -00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2CC 892 1 29 ----- --------------- -, 3S '27BC 78 55 221 ------ ---------- 114 so is sa"cra- , Cn E --------------- --------------- -3 160, 16CC, 160^ 1600 160C 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 '-.CC i'00 1.0C 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0C -.0L 1.0C 2.00 1,00 C.59 0.41 !.OD 0.70 0.30 1.00 160C 16,0 32CC 1600 938 662 1600 1112 486 --- - - - ------- -------------- - --------------- ----------- 1600 Ca pa �: i Vz,- C.UE 0.07 C_4C 0,05 D.08 0.14 0.10 0.10 ---- 0.C1 Traffix 7.�.--!- ,) 2001 Dowling Assoc Licensed CC RK ENGINEERING GROUP ICU CALCULATIONS - EXISTING FLUS PROJECT Ex t Proj AM Wed Feb 20, 2002 12:33:55 ------------------------------o__-_----__mmme__e-_-_-____-__e__m_-_---______ Page 4-1 Extended Stay America Traffic Impact Analysis Diamond Bar, California -----------------------------------------------------_--_-______--__-__-_-----__ Existing Plus Project Conditions Level Of Service Computation Report !C'- 1(Loss as Cycle Length s�) Method (Future Volume Alternative) intersection 41 60 Fwy East Ramps / Golden Springs Dr Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.673 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y -R � 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): =20= Octlma' Cvc1e: 47 Level Of Service: B Aperoac' North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: ------------ L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --------------- :_--p----_------II--------------- L - T - R '_ Split Phase Split Phase Protected hCcntrc: Protected f Rign-s: Include Include Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: ------------ 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1! 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 ------------------------------ 1 0 2 0 1 Volume Mcduie: -------`- Base Vol: 23 15 10 433 3 51 202 377 11 2 820 394 Grow -F. Ad,: 1.OD 1.00 1.O0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 In_t.a'_ Bse: 23 15 10 433 3 51 202 377 11 2 820 394 Adder Vc': C 0 0 25 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 20 PasserBvVc:: 0 0 C 0 0 G 0 0 0 0 0 0 In= -;a: P,._. 23 15 12 458 3 51 202 379 11 2 822 414 -"= %, -.or ..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ..00 1.O0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.0O 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PAF Vc_';;r' 23 15 10 458 3 51 202 379 11 2 822 414 c D o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reccce:i`.'c_. 23 15 10 456 3 51 202 379 11 2 822 414 x.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 . 00 1 . 00 11.0c .. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0D 1 -•a- c - ------------ 2- i- 10 456 3 51 202 379 11 --------------- i.--------------- 2 822 .00 414 II--------------- II ------ - -- - --i �.=_.-ne 16C� 1600 1600 1600 1600 160C 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1.00 1.00 1.00 _.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane �.4c �.3= 0.21 1.79 0.0- 0.20 ..00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 .-..t_ .; c._ 76-' 50E 33 2863 19 319 1600 3200 1600 --- ---- - ---------------- 1600 3200 1600 --------------- � Mcd - --------------- ........... C.03 0.16 3.16 C.16 0.13 0.12 0.01 0.00 0.26 0.26 -a-- ` --3.-_-s ;c: 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP Ex > Proj AM __________--m__m__-____---me_________________________________ Fri Feb 22, 2002 12:11:14 Page 4-1 ___________________________________________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report CU !(Ross&asgCycle gLength %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) MSprings intersection #2 Brea Canyon RdR/iGolden bDr Cycle (sect: 100 48WACz®tical Val./cap, X): r 0.96C Loss Time ;sec,. 10 (Y+R 4 sec, Average Delay (sec/veh): Og.kra Cycle: 143 Level Off Service: Xxxxxx E Approach: North Bound Sout Bound *�East RBound aWrrr�WWest �ro rBound Movement: L - T - R L - , - R L - m -----`-- ---------------- Pr^-e ted Protected ----II--------------- Protected Protected RiaContro: ..^.t s: Include Ov- Include Include Min. Gree::: C 0 0 0 ., 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 ------------ ------- 2 0 2 " C 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 y 1 0 2 0 1 Volume Moc-�1e: AM '- ------- Base Vol: 203 366 282 157 423 526 312 491 191 232 700 62' Grow",': Adm: _.00 l.oc _.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ir,itiai Bse: 2C3 366 282 167 423 526 312 491 191 232 700 621 Added Vc'_: C 3 0 3 3 22 27 0 0 0 PasserBVVC-: C C 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Initial Fu,-: 203 369 282 190 426 0 0 548 339 491 191 0 0 0 232 700 User Ad] _.CC. _ or, 1.00 1.00 i.Cc x.00 - _.00 1.00 1.00 625 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF AC. -.00 _.eC _.00 1.0C 1.00 x.00 1.00 :.00 1.00 -491 1.00 1.00 PHF Vclume: 203 369 282 190 42= 54? 339 191 i.00 232 700 625 Reauct Vn- C C C c _ O 0 0 0 0 Reduce^ 1'c' 2.3 365 282 190 421: 546 339 491 191 0 232 700 625 P'--E Ac)' _.0� _.Oc _.CC -OC 1.C.: _.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0C L :+d� ,.CC 1.00 _.C, _.00 1.00 "Oe 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fina'_ Vc:.. 2._ 365 282 19C 42c 54E 339 49' 191 232 700 625 S=_ .,.. ---------------II---------------; Sat/-ane. _6C_ _6C-, 1600 16CC 16c1 16CC 16CC 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 _.00 ..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Sa=.. 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 _o„_ 120, 1600 320C 32CC ;--------------- 160-. 320C 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 l-----:---- s_.•s__ n------ .I--------------- II---------------', C.OF 0.34 C.1'_ 0.15 0.12 0.14 0.22 0.39 Tra`-,x '....11. (c: 2001 Dowlbnc Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP Ex r Proj AM Wed Feb 20, 2002 12:33:55 ___-___e______________e__________e___-___s_-__________m-_____--_e____--___-__--_ Page 6-1 Extended Stay America Traffic Impact Analysis Diamond Bar, California __________________________m________________________________---__________-_______ Existing Plus Project Conditions Level Of Service Computation Report iC:! xa+.go-,..«w.awwaxawRxwwo-xwo-aaaxwawxxaaxao-w.xxawxaoaao-xxwx '_(Loss as Cycle Lergth %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection x,swaxxaaxaaaaw«axwxaxax. 43 Brea Canyon Rd / 60 Fwy W Ramps awag®ax�xa.axxaxawaxaaxwwaaawwaxawwxaaawwaaaaxxaxxvwwaaxaxxxaxaaaxxaaaxxxxwxaaw« cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.866 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optima' Cycle: wwwaaax wwwo-wawawxwaawaxwwwaw 85 Level Of Service: axawaxxxwaxweanwaxwwamxaawxxamxwxaxaxxxwxanxxvaaaxxw D Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: ------------ L - T - R L - - - R L - T - R '--------------- --------------- L - T - R Control: --------------- Protected Permitted Split Phase Split Phase R -g a s: Include Include Include Include M:::. Green : C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Laces: ------------ 2 0 2 0 0 D 0 2 D 1 0 0 0 0 0 I --------------- 0 0 1! 0 1 Volume .Module: ;--------------- J --------------- �---------------� Base Vol: 479 826 0 0 779 156 0 0 0 357 0 783 Growth. Ad,: _.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0C 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1P11 -In' Bse: 479 826 0 0 779 156 0 0 0 357 0 783 Added Vc_: 0 34 D 0 28 20 0 0 0 0 0 25 Pas=erEVVc_: 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 D 0 D 0 479 86C 0 0 807 176 0 0 0 357 0 808 User Ad_ _.00 1.00 ..00 1.00 1.00 e.0C x.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P:(F Ac-' -.oC 1.00 -,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.O0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fi:F VC. c:ne 479 860 0 0 807 176 0 0 0 357 0 808 Redccc '.�_ D C 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F'. c- Gt:Cc 479 B6C 0 0 80' 176 0 0 0 357 0 806 FGL - �. -.00 _.00 _.00 1.00 i.oc 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0c .,00 I.DG ..00 -.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - -••a- . --- . ------------ , , _ 86C 0 C 807 176 0 0 0 --------------- 357 0 808 16C' 160,1 1600 160C 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adi'.:s;r`er:_ 1.CC 1.00 1.OD 1.O0 i.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane` �.C: 2.00 0.05 0.03 2.0C 11.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.61 0.00 1.39 32CD 3200 0 C 3200 1600 C 0 0 981 0 2219 Ca oa:: a-vs1s Mo�iu1E____I II ............ O.00 C -OC Oa2p5 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.36 Tre`_`_>; -.=.11115 (C; 200' Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP Ex - Proj Alit wed Feb 20, 2002 12:33:55 ________________m_-_-_---__-_o________-_-__-_---_________m___--_ Page 7-1 Extended Stay America Traffic Impact Analysis Diamond Bar, California ____________________________________________________________________ Existing Plus Project Conditions Level Of Service Computation Report fCU!(Loss ss.asWCycle a.Length ...%)WMeWbod ( Future Volume Intersection .w..m##wraWwa.w.s..##.w.x..aa##vW..re....r#ar#wbrWW.rW@b..a.WrgbeWaa.W.....#r.ry �Alternative) 04 Brea Canyon Rd / Lycominc St b.ar.ra Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.818 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxX Optimal laCycle: Level l#Of Service: W..WEast p Acproach: North Bound South Bound WBound ##axab�West Boundgww Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L ----------- '-------------- Control: li Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rig^ts: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: --------------------------- C 2 0 1 1 0 2 D 1 0 1 0 0 1 I --------------- 0 1 0 C 0 1 Volume Module: --------------- 11_______________� Base Vol: 309 _24' 60 18 560 62 73 60 223 141 73 2C Growl: Adj: _.Co i.o0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ir.i c a: Use: 305 1247 60 18 56C 82 73 60 223 141 73 20 Added Vol: C iC 0 14 2 0 0 4 0 48 3 PasserBvVcl: C D 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 3 Initia_ Put: 3309 1257 60 32 562 82 73 64 223 0 0 189 76 0 23 User Ad;: -.DC ;.CC 1.O0 l.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.O0 PHF -.:- 1.0c _.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.O0 1.00 P;" YC'Jme: 305 12' 60 32 562 82 73 64 223 189 76 23 Rea.= V'-- . C 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Recucec '.,,_- 3C� _._- 60 32 562 82 73 64 223 189 76 23 PCE A-. --�, - ..CC 1.0D 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 _-'` - - -- ----- _.CC 1.00 1.00 _.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.O0 --------------- 6C 32 567 82 73 64 223 ------------ 189 76 23 sa-/Lace _�_6Ct 16C0 160C 160C 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lar:es _..;; �:.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.53 0.47 1.00 0.71 0.29 1.00 r_na_ Sa- -`�- _ _ �.. .. .. 16C0 160C 3200 1600 853 747 1600 _______________ 1141 459 1600 ?.r.a Cu1`____I_______________ X0.04 _______________I vc-; sat �.__ ,..35 0.02 O.1B 0.05 0.09 0.09 0.14 0.17 0.17 0.01 Tra-'fix 7 200: Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP Ex + Pro) PM Wed Feb 20, 2002 12:27:07 Page 4-1 ______________________________________________________ ®_®_e______________ Extended Stay America Traffic Impact Analysis Diamond Bar, California Existing Plus Project Conditions ________________________________________________________________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report ICL' 1(Loss as Cycle Length Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 60 Fwy East Ramps / Golden Springs Dr «...s.«...«..s..x.ws«.sso.sso.s«os«...ono.sssoossos000 os.as«awomo.o«nso.o.«soon« Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.844 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 78 Level Of Service: D Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ ----------- Ii --------------- ------------ Control Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Rlgnns: Include Include Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 11 0 0 1 0 1! 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 --------------- _____________________I__________-__-_ Volume Module: PM Base Vol; 67 39 15 247 4 44 255 841 22 20 592 793 Growth Ad;: 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 In tial 13=_e: 67 39 15 247 4 44 255 841 22 20 592 793 Added Vol: 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 21 PasserBvVc_: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 39 15 274 4 44 255 844 22 20 594 814 Use: A _00 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ?PF ad- _.0C -.DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 67 39 15 274 4 44 255 844 22 20 594 814 Rewe_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Recuce 67 39 15 274 4 44 255 844 22 20 594 814 P_c n _.CO _.(!C _.00 ..oc 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ..LF .An- =.0C :.00 i.0'11 1.0c 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 _ _,.a_6 39 15 274 4 44 255 844 22 20 594 814 ----------- ---------------il---------------II-------------- _______________ Satnra�:n-. clow Module: ( S.:'La7.e: 16CC 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 _.00 _cc 1.Oc x.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes ...56 C.32 0.12 1.71 0.02 0.27 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 F-7a- 8661 516 198 2723 40 437 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 ------------ ----------- - --I --------------- ------ La--a=_-. Module: v /Ea_ -_ ep>. 3O 0.08 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.16 0.26 0.01 0.01 0.19 0.51 7ra''__x "'.5.1115 (ci 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP Ex , Proj Pm Fri Feb 22, 2002 12:08:19 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 3-1 Level Of Service Computation Report ICT -1 !(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection 42 Brea Canyon Rd / Golden Springs Dr Cycle (sec): 100 critical Vol./car). (X): 1.096 Loss Time tsec): 10 (Y,R = q sec; Average Delay (sec/veh): XY-X>= Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: • F Approach: North, Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - 7 - R L T R L T ------------ --------------- --------------- Ccntrci Protected Protected --------------- Protected !I --------------- Protected Ric"ILS include 0."1 Include Include Min Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 ------------ --------------- 2 0 2 ------------------------------ 0 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 Volume Module: PM --------------- Base Vol: 338 539 409 319 627 601 215 996 317 259 6B6 284 Growth Ad]: !.Do 1-00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 initia! sse. 338 539 409 319 627 601 215 996 317 259 686 284 Added Vol: 0 4 0 3 3 23 30 0 0 PasserBvvol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1n. --,a-- Fu, 33E 542 409 322 63C 624 0 245 996 317 259 686 289 User A::] -.0c '-00 �- 1.00 i.0i 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P- T,- , ... -.O2 -.0c i-00 1.00 1.00 1 . 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P'-'- Vc-,-:7e '3E 54, 409 322 630 624 245 996 317 259 686 289 0 0 0 0 0 RetuLed 33E 542 409 - 32' 630 624 245 996 317 259 686 289 P- A�: -cc -.OD i.00 i.00 i.cc 1.00 1.00 I.Co 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - -.00 1.00 rina, 1.00 1.00 i-00 1-00 1.00 i�OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 543 409 ------ - ----------------------------- 32' 63� 62, 245 996 317 259 686 289 , i --------------- ---------------� Sar 160', 160L 160,' 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 16C)c -.C2 i.oc 1.00 i . D 11 i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 C- 2.02 2 '.00 2 . 00 2 . 00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 60C 3200 3200 --------------- 1600 3200 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 --------------- 11 --------------- x.2E 0.1C 0.2C 0.39 0.08 C-31 0.20 0-16 0.21 0.18 .............. Traffix � _:--- 1c, 2031 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP Ex , Pro, PM Wed Feb 20, 2002 12:27:07 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 6-1 Extended Stay America Traffic Impact Analysis Diamond Bar, California -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Existing Plus Project Conditions Level Of Service Computation Report ICU !(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Tnterseczicn 43 Brea Canyon Rd / 6C Fvv W Ramps Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Val./Cap. (X): 0.912 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y.R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxx_xx Opulmal Cycle: 106 Level Of Service: E Aoproac'-1: North Bound Soutn Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : ------------ L - T - R L - T R L T R I --------------- I --------------- L Ccn,-rc-': I --------------- 11 Protected Permitted Split Phase --------------- Split Phase TCjUde Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: ------------ 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 I --------------- --------------- 0 Volume Module: --------------- PM --------------- Base Vo--: 385 642 0 0 1242 344 0 0 0 315 2 597 Grc,th Ad.: !.00 1.00 I.c)c 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 lriiLial Bse; 385 642 0 D 1242 344 0 0 0 315 2 597 Added Vol: 0 38 0 0 29 21 0 0 0 0 0 PasserEvVo' 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 Initial -u-: 385 680 C C 1271 365 0 0 0 0 0 0 315 2 624 User A7, .()C -.00 I.CC 1.00 1.00 I'OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -AC-' i.00 1.00 1.00 i.00 1-00 i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0c pl- 7 Vc -�Me� '.* 385 68C C 0 127: 36E 0 0 0 315 2 624 Re c' - `- - . I C 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rea,=e� 385 68-- 0 0 127, 365 1 0 0 315 2 624 p7- '-.C" :.00 -Dcl 1.00 '-.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 XL.- _.cc 1.00 1.0c 1.00 '-.Co 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 z --------- - 385 682 0 2 127- 365 0 0 0 --- ------ ---------------- 315 2 624 Sa z - r -- -- --. ------------ -c� Moacle-----: i --- I I --------------- .Sa-/Lane 16'-- 160C 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 i.01-1 i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 Lanes � 'c 2-00 0.00 0'00 2-00 1-00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.01 1.32 ------------ 32CC j2C' C 0 3200 1600 0 0 0 --------------- ---------------- 1071 7 2122 --------------- Modu-t�: 0.23 0-00 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.29 Tr,:1­-X � 1-15 to; 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP Ex + Proj PM Wed Feb 20, 2002 12:27:07 __-___--erre__ Page 7-1 Extended Stay America Traffic Impact Analysis Diamond Bar, California Existing Plus Project Conditions _______________________________________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report )Metthod (Future Volume Alternative! ramrrrmICU I( oss r.marmrycle,Length%) Method Intersection #4Brea rCanyon nrRdra/ Lycoming Strrmrr.rrrrrrrrrrrrmmrrmrrarrrrrraaam a rrrrrraCritical Cycle lsec): 100 rVol./cap. (X): 0.897 Loss Time (see_): 10 (Y.R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Cpaalma.aCyclewamalaaam9yaaarraaar.mmmmrrLevelrofmService: rrEastrBoundrrrrrrrr D Approach: North Bound South Hound WessttBound Bourd Movement: L - T _ R - T - R T LL -------'--'-'------------- - R --11-----'PPPPPP--- L - T - R Control: 11------ Permitted - Permitted Permitted j�----Perm______ Permitted _�. Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 ------------ I--------------- --------------- --------------- Volume Module: PM _______________� Base Vol: 20C 892 129 38 1272 00 78 55 221 114 50 15 Growt: ICU CALCULATIONS - OPENING YEAR (2004) WITHOUT PROJECT CY w/o P AM ---------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- Thu -Feb 21, 2002 15:16:45 Page 7-1 Extended Stay America Traffic impact Analysis Diamond Bar, California Opening Year 2004 Without Project Conditions -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection 91 60 Fwy East Ramps Golden Springs Dr cvcle (sec); 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0,727 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y'R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxx_ucx Optimal CvcAxle: 54 Level Of Service: C Approa= \Tcr'!: Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound mcllleme= : I, - T - R ------------ --------------- - T - R L -T - R --------------- L - T - R control: Split Phase I ------------ 11 Split Phase Protected--- - -------------- Protected RI:A' - ' ts. Include Include Include OV1 M: . Green: 0 0 0 -' 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1! a 0 1 0 2 0 1 ------------ I --------------- --------------- Voiume Module: --------------- ---------------� Base Vol: 23 15 10 433 3 51 202 377 11 2 820 394 Growth h Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1-04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 inl'-1al Bse: 24 16 10 450 3 53 210 392 ii 2 853 410 Added Vol: C 0 10 102 0 0 0 20 0 2 , passer6%'Vo- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 23 Tr:'t-Q- 24 ic 20 0 0 552 3 53 210 412 11 0 0 4 858 0 433 Use- -cc 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1E 20 552 3 53 210 412 11 4 858 433 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fezu7:e7: 24 16 20 552 3 53 210 412 11 4 858 433 F�: 1101 1.00 1.00 1.00 _.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 X-7 %'c -0� - 1.00 i.oc 1.00 i.co 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 24 16 20 -- --------------- 552 3 53 210 412 11 --------------- 4 858 433 --------------- --------------- 161- 1600 1600 1600 1600 160e 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Ac- 1.01 1.00 I -DC 11.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.34 1.82 D-01 0.17 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 6-. 4:- 545 -- --------------- 2905 16 279 1600 3200 1600 --------------- 1600 3200 1600 Y-d,-,le: ------------- ---------- - ---- VC Sa* 4 ' 0'04 0-19 0'19 0-19 0-13 0-13 0.01 0.00 0.27 0.27 � 11-5 (C) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP MITIGB - OY w/o P AM Fri Feb 22, 2002 19:14:42 ______________ ________a_e_____®__m_ Page 1_, Extended Stay America Traffic Impact Analysis Diamond Bar, California opening Year 2004 without Project Conditions ____________________________________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report .. .+ .ICU l (Loss+asgCycle Length Method (Future Volume Alternative) &Ramos m; + Intersection 41 6C Fwy East Golden� Springs Dr Cycle (sec:: 100 Critical vol./Cap. (X): 0.727 Loss Time (ser): 10 (Y*R = 4 sec: Average Delay (see/veh): xxxx OFt=mam Cycle: 54 Level Of Service: xx .*eW�RgEast QBound +BoundRBound AperoacH4RIXtl+WNorth t4YR«.+West South Bound Movement.: ., - T - R ., -_ - n L --------------------------- R Control: _ Split Phase Split Phase Protected " Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Ignore Min. Greer.: 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1! 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 D 0 --------------------` 1 1 0 2 0 1 Volume Module: 1 II--------------- Base Vol. 23 15 10 433 ., 51 202 377 11 2 820 Grow[!-. Ad-,: _.0, 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 394 1.04 1.04 1.04 1ni-la! Bse '✓c-- 24 16 10 450 53 210 392 11 2 853 410 Addeo C C 10 102 C 0 0 20 0 PasserBvVc:. C 0 0 C 2 S 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 D Use-, 20 552 3 53 210 412 11 4 858 433 �'�=. -.7C Pr:- Ac': -.0C ...DC -00 _.00 1.O2 ..00 i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 _.0" PHF %'C"Jme: _.cc _.00 1.00 ..00 -.00 ..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 2; 16 20 552 3 53 210 412 11 4 BSB 0 Reduce %'c-1 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O ReacceJ VC=. 24 ie` 20 - 552 53 210 412 11 0 PCE ., ^'L �_ 1.00 i.00 _.00 ..00 _,00 1.00 1.00 9 858 0 1.00 1.00 0.00 _..,- _.... _.... _.00 _.CC ..00 _.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 . _..�_ - `. - _ _ 21C - - - _ 412 11 ---------------- 4 858 0 --------------- `"-'- -""- - --�- •��.. 1600 160C 160C 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 _.00 _.00 1.00 ..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.3- ...C-- ..._. _.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2,00 1.00 __'_ -- 275 16CC 3203 1600 ---------------------- 1600 3200 1600 --------------- - _ -.34 15 -- '- --3 0.13 0.01 O.OD 0.27 0.00 Traffix ---- 1cl 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP OY W/O P AM Fri Feb 22, 2002 11:09;22 _a__e__________--e®__®________ Page 7-1 Extended Stay America Traffic Impact Analysis Diamond Bar, California Opening Year 2004 Without Project Conditions -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Ser -vice Computation Report www ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) wwwwwwInzersecz1on 22 Brea Canyon Rd I/ Golden Springs Dr ww Cycle (sec): lCo Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.006 Loss T -,me (sec): 10 (YIR = 4 sec) average Delay (sec/veh): XXXXXX Oo�` OoZ,r,qal CyC-�e: ISO Level Of Service: F Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L R LR ------------ --------------- --------------- L - T - R control: Protected --------------- Protected Protected --------------- Protected Riq"Ls: Include OVI Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 ------------ --------------- --------------- Volume Module: AM --------------- --------------- Base Vc' 203 366 282 187 423 526 312 491 191 232 700 62- GrO•'- - a-;: 1.04 1.04 1 .04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 :nizial :2se, 211 36' 293 194 440 547 324 511 199 241 728 646 Added Vc:: 0 30 0 5 7 29 132 0 0 0 Pa ss e r Bvvc 1 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 �u': 2:1 411 293 199 447 576 456 511 199 241 728 666 Use-- A--. '.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pili An:: -.00 1.00 i.01 I.0C 1.00 1.00 -00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Vclume: 21- 411 293 199 447 576 456 511 199 241 728 666 Vc-'. C C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced'.4il 293 99 447 576 456 511 199 728 666 pc� %+=-241 -CC 1�00 I -OC 1 -OC 1 -Ge 1.00 ,.Do 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 CC -.00 I.Oc -.00 2.0C 1.00 1.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 1.0D ------666 - --- 29-- --------------- 199 447 576 456 sil 199 ---------------- 241 728 --------------- ---------------- 16CZ 1603 160C 1600 1603 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Laces '--O� 1.00 :.Co i.0C i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 F-nL- CL 2.00 2.00 -CC 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 S---, ------------ 16DC 3202 1606 ---------------- 3203 3200 1600 3200 3200 1600 --------------- 1600 3200 1600 _ - -ataz- Ana. I IL;i-- Moaule: --------------- --------------- Vo -Sa- C.-- 0-18 -O.D6 0.14 0 36 0.14 0-16 0.12 O -IS 0.23 0.42 Trdfzix (c' 2001 Dowling Assoc Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP MITIGB - OY w/o P AM Fri Feb 22, 2002 18:42:57 Page 1-1 ___________ Extended Stay America Traffic Impact Analysis Diamond Bar, California Opening Year 2004 Without Project Conditions ________________________________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report »»»»»»trICU I (Loss#as Cycle Length i) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Inte»»rseccticn. a»area»Canyon Rd»/MGolden Sprmngs Dr » »»»»» Cycle tseci: 1e0 Criticael Vol./Cap. (X)®»a»»»»»»802 0.W»»e Loss Time (sec): 10 (YsR = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.802 Optimal Cycle: 67 xxxxxx Level Of Service: D Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound Movement: L - "� - West Bound R L - T - P. L ------------ I --------------- _____ "___Prot________ Control: Protected Protected Protected _ Rights: ovl Protected ignore Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 Lanes: 2 C'_ 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 1 0 1 00 20 0 ,o ----- -- ----- --`- O ---I Voi[me MooUle AM , Base Vol: 203 366 282 167 423 526 312 491 191 232 700 621 Growth Ad;.: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1n.tial 2se: 21! 361 293 194 440 547 324 511 1.04 1.04 1.09 Added Vol: 0 30 0 199 241 726 646 5 7l9 132 0 0 0 0 20 Passe r9vVo1: 0 0 0 0 D D 0 0 Initial Fut: 211 411 293 0 0 0 6 456 511 199 241 728 666 User Ada: .00 1 199 447 576 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0c '.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PH- Adm,: ,. ..OG _.00 1.00 1.00 0.02 x.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P'rF Vciume: Y._ 293 199 447 1.00 0 456 511 199 241 728 666 P.eauc_ Vc. � C 0 D c C0 0 0 0 Recc =e; ��c- --- 411 29-,195 447 C 456 511 199 241 728 6666 0.0c _.0c 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -.oc 1.00 x.00 3.0c " _,.00 _.oc 1.00 1.00 1.00 ---. -- ---_---'° 1.00 9 241 728 199 447 C 456 511 19 666 ------- -h--------------I sa" ]us.r. Aer 1600 1600 1606 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 :.apeed. r.t _.C'- -.D= 1.00 1.Oc i.0^1_.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ..00 2.00 2.00 1.D0 2.00 2.16 0.84 1.O0 2.00 1.00 Sa-.. -- ? 16CC 3200 320,1 1600 320C 3456 1344 1600 II1600 --------------- --------------- _ ------Xccu:e---- 0 ii 0.14 D.00 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.23 0.42 Traf°iv - - 2C01 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RE ENGINEERING GROUP OY W/o P AM, Thu Feb 21, 2002 15:16:45 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 9-1 Extended Stay America Traffic impact Analysis Diamond Bar, California -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Opening Year 2004 Without Project Conditions Level Of Service Computation Report ICU !(Loss as Cycle Length %) method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection, 43 Brea Canyon Rd / 60 Fwy W Ramus Cycle (sec): 10o Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.924 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): XXXXXX Optimal Cycle! 114 Level Of Service: E Arnroacl-. North Bound SOULh Bound East Bound West Bound Movemenz: ------------ L - T - R LR L T R --------------- 11 --------------- L Cc.-.--ro:: --------------- 1� Protected Permitted Split Phase --------------- Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: ------------ 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 I --------------- --------------- Volume Module: --------------- --------------- Base Vo_-: 479 826 0 0 779 156 0 0 0 357 0 783 Grown-. Ad,: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1ri-_a- nse, 49E 859 0 0 810 162 0 0 0 371 0 814 AcnLc C 183 0 0 41 23 0 0 0 0 0 102 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 495 1042 0 0 851 iRs 0 0 0 371 0 916 i.00 1.00 -.00 i.01' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -.00 1.00 -1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PH e 498 1082 0 C 85i 185 0 0 0 371 0 R e - . C 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 916 Reece_ 1,1c- 499 1042 0 0 85- 185 0 0 0 371 0 0 916 PC-' A:- M-.- A 1.00 -1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -.0^, -Cc .00 1.0c 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 F -'n--- ------------ 493' 1052 0 � ssi 185 0 0 0 --------------- --------------- --------------- 371 0 916 11 .e- --------------- Ste- LanL '6,C 160D 160C 1600 160C 1600 1600 1600 IGOO 1600 1600 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 _.2' 0' C C"' L) 0- 2-00 ,'-JC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.58 xxxx 1.42 ------------ 32" �21-- C 0 32C3 1600 U 0 0 -------------- ---------------- 923 0 2277 --------------- 11 --------------- 3- 0.00 0.00, 0.2- C.1: C.00 C.00 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.40 '1 1 I - � (c) 2001 Dow,-'rg AsScC. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP MI°:IGH - OY w/o P AM Fri Feb 22, 2002 11:20:35 _______m________-___ Page 1-1 Extended Stay America Traffic Impact Analysis Diamond Bar, California Opening Year 2004 Without Project Conditions _m_____________________________________ Level Of Service Computation, Report _ ee®e.%eI bel(Losskas Cycle *Length &%) Method (Future Volume Alternative) tretre.,.ee.,,etreeee.trtre.tr<..eee.e... Intersection 43 ,.ea..a.,.on Ra./.60...ytrWtrRamps Cycle (sec;: 100 W LLCriticaltrVol./Cap. (X): » 0 eee..ee.s.tr. 0.606 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R 4 sec) Average Delav (sec/veh): Optima'_ Cycle: 66 Be rv$ee xxxxxx ed...e«tr......eeee,...ea„eee..trtre®.e.mtreae,e�e��e D Approach: North Bound South Bound East BoundetrxRtr®e WestBound Movement: I, - _ R L- und ------------ I--------------------------- Control: ProtectedPermitted Split Phase h_______________ Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: C 0 G 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 2 C 2 0 0 0 G 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------ 0 ------------- 1 0 1! 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 475 826 0 0 779 156 0 0 Grown: Ad;: 0 _.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 357 0 783 Initia_ Bee: 498 859 0 0 610 162 1.04 1.04 1.04 Addec Vo_: 0 0 0 0 18" 0 0 371 0 814 PasserEVVol: 41 23 0 0 0 C 0 D 0 0 102 Isei A_ Fut: G 0 D 0r. 0 0 498 1042 C 0 851 185 0 0 D p User 0 0 _.G - 0� 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 371 0 1.00 1.00 916 P'' = Add,: PHP Vclume. -.0" 1.O0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.O0 1.00 1.00 49E 1042 0 0 851 185 0 0 0 Recut_ 'VC:: ;; .. D 0 0 ^ 371 0 916 G 0 0 851 i85 0 0 0 0 _ P`_ - Ac- 0 0 - �� _.00 1.00 _.00 1.Oc ,.00 1.00 1.00 371 0 1.O0 1.00 916 -1.00 --�- - -- _.00 1.011, 1.00 1.0C 1.00 1.0p 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 _ C 851 185 0 0 _ - 0 371 0 916 - -------------` ------------ "'�;Lane. Ac 160C 1600 160C 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 �''"s" ` - - -.C:. ;.00 i.00 _.00 '.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Sa: -.CL C�.Oc 0.0c 2.00 1.00 0.00 G.oc o.oc �_,,. 1,00 0.00 2.00 . _..c_ .. G1611-1 __ __�C 3200 "" C 0 0 ------------ 1600 0 3200 Ca =-- . ria _,.......ie---- ...,---------------ji --------------- j ``��°" - -- '" C.o^_ 0D C.27 C.12 G.Oo C.00 0.00 .... .... 0.23 0.00 0.29 7ra4f_x 7 - icc 200' Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP OY W/o P AM Thu Feb 21, 2002 15:16:45 ___________________ _ ____________________ _____________________ Page 10-1 _____________ Extended Stay America Traffic Impact Analysis Diamond Bar, California Opening Year 2004 Without Project Conditions _______________________________________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report ICU !(Loss as Cycle Length W) Method (Future Volume Alternative) n.tersectecn #4 Brea Canyon. Rd / Lycoming Sc Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (x): 0,893 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): Optimal Cycle: 97 Level Of Service: (» D Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T ------------ i --------------- II --------------- R Cor.tro-: �;--------------- Permitted Permitted Permitted I Permitted �_ Rights: Include Include Include Include Mir.. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 --------- --------------- 0 1 Volume Module: --------------- ---------------� Base Vol: 309 1247 60 18 560 02 73 60 223 141 73 20 Growl^ Ad,: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Init_al Bse: 321 1297 62 19 582 85 76 62 232 147 76 21 Added Vol. 0 284 0 5 63 0 0 0 PasserByvoi: 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 20 Initial Fuc: 0 0 0 0 321 1581 62 24 645 85 76 62 232 0 0 147 76 0 User Ad _.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 1.00 PHF Ad. ..0v -.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FHF Vc1 Red=c- '.�P 321 1581 62 24 645 85 76 62 232 147 76 41 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rec.aeC �.c- 32. 158'_ 62 24 645 85 76 62 232 0 147 76 0 P::E A ..0� ..00 1.00 1.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 1.00 "-'- ;•" ..pC _.GC _.00 1.00 1.O0 1.0c 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 --r•-- -c- 32_ 1581 62 24 645 85 76 62 232 147 __ _..---------------------- -ii----------- - 76 41 --�i--------------- 11'--------------j Sat. _are 1601_60C 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 16001600 1600 1600 La_.c; anes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 =,na_ 1.C: 2.oC 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 0 -SS 0.45 1.00 0.66 0.34 1.00 Say. 160- 320C 1600 160C 3200 1600 878 722 1600 ____ _______________ 1054 546 1600 Ca �a�-"-'. :i.:a _'.'S._ _______________ I MoG,I c -___-__-__-___ ,✓_._ .es. G.04 0609 0.20 C.OS 0.09 0.09 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.03 Tri`=ix -' -E-1115 ;c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP OY w/o P PM 21, 2002 15:19:3e ---------------------------------------------------------------q-------- ---------Thu -Feb Pde 6-1 Extended Stay America Traffic Impact Analysis Diamond Bar, California Opening Year 2004 Without Project Conditions _________________________________________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection 41 60 Fwy East Ramos Golden Springs Dr Cycle (sec): .......... 100 Critical Vol./cap. (X): ....... 0.928 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y,R 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): XXXXXX Optimal Cycle: 116 Level Of Service: Approach: North Bound South Bound East Sound West Bound Movement: L - T - R T R L T ------------'---P---------- I --------------- Control: 11 --------------- Split Phase Split Phase Protected 1 --- 1------------ Protected Rights: Include Include Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1! 0 0 1 0 ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- Volume Module: PM --------------- Base Vol: 67 39 .15 247 4 44 255 841 22 20 592 793 Growth AdD: 1.04 1-04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 lh'Llal Bse: 7' 41 16 257 4 46 265 875 23 21 616 825 Added Vol 0 c 3 34 a 0 0 7 PasserEyVol: a 0 0 0 0 0 11 21 106 Inicia-- Fut 0 0 0 0 7C 411 19 291 4 46 265 862 23 User Aci3: 1.00 -_.11C 1.00 1.00 11.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.01) 32 637 1.00 1.00 931 1.00 PH- Ad-: ' - _ PHP 3C 11.0c 1.00 1.00 -,.Go 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Volume, ReouL, 7c 41 19 292 4 46 265 682 23 32 637 931 Vol: 0 C 0 a 0 0 Reduced Vol 70 41 19 291 4 46 265 882 23 PCE Ac;: -.cc .00 .00 1.0C 1.00 .0C 1.00 1,00 1.00 32 637 1.00 J.co 931 1.0 a ML: Ad] Fina: 0 1.00 1.0c 1.0c 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Vc- ----------- 7C 4-' 19 291 4 46 265 882 23 --------------- 32 637931 ---------------- 11 --------------- --------------- Sa,-L,ane 1600 1600 1600 1600 160C 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Ad,us,rner.: 1'00 1.00 i.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 _.cc 1.00 1.00 ..aces Sac.3- C ': 0,14 1.72 0.02 0.27 I-OC 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 -- ------ 66- sj� 21 2731 3S 430 1600 3200 1600 ------------- --------------- 1600 3200 1600 -- aca2---. modul--e--------------- --------------- Vo: a,, .- cr_'- � C� C cE 0-08 C-l-' 0 0.11 0.17 0.28 0.01 0.02 0.20 0.58 Moves: Traffix III= �Z� 2001 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP MITIGE - CY w/o P PM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fri Fel: 22, 2002 18:48:45 Page 1-1 Extended Stay America Traffic Impact Analysis Diamond Bar, California -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Opening Year 2004 Without Project Conditions Level Of Service Computation Report ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection. 91 60 Fwy East Ramps Golden Springs Dr Cycle (se::): 1..00 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.652 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 45 Level Of Service; B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement; --------------------- L - T - R --------------- L - T - R L T R 11 --------------- L T R Control: Split Phase 11 ------ 11 Split Phase Protected --------------- Protected Rights: Include include Include ignore Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: ------------ 0 0 i! 0 0 --------------- 1 0 1! a 0 1 0 2 0 1 --------------- 1 0 2 0 Volume Module; PM --------------- --------------- Base Vol: 67 39 15 247 4 44 255 841 22 20 592 793 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial 9se: 70 41 16 257 4 46 265 875 23 21 616 825 Added Vol: 0 0 3 34 0 0 0 7 0 11 21 106 PassersvVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fur 70 41 19 291 4 46 265 882 23 32 637 0 931 User Ad;: i.ac i.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 0.00 PHF Adz: 1.00 1-0c 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.DC 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Volume: 7D 41 19 291 4 46 265 882 23 32 637 0 Reduc- klo- 0 11 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 Reducezi Vcl: ?c 4' 19 291 4 46 265 882 23 32 637 0 !'C-- Ad- i'()c -.00 1.00 1.0c i.oc -.00 11.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 M.L7 A�--. i.o� i.01. -00 1.0c 1.0c 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Fina' Vo- ---------- 7C 41 19 --------------- 11 29'- 4 46 265 882 23 --------------- 32 637 0 Sa--'ra�lon F�o, mocule: H --------------- 11 --------------- sat/Lane: 160,: 160, 1600 1600 1600 160C 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Ad]ust,.un-, 1.o,-, -.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane-Q: 0-55 C-31 C.14 1.7. 0.02 0.27 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Say.. ----------- 865 504 231 --------------- 2731 39 430 160C 3200 1600 ------------- 1600 3200 1600 CduaLir',, Anal vsis Module -- H --------------- 11 --------------- Vo:./Sat. 02 C op 0-08 C 1' 0-11 0.1= 0.17 0.28 0.01 0.02 0.20 0.00 Cri' Moves. Tra�fix ".x.1115 (c; 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP DY w/o P PM Fri Feb 22, 2002 11:42:12 Page 4-1 ___________ Extended Stay America Traffic Impact Analysis Diamond Har, California Opening Year 2004 Without Project Conditions ______________________________________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report .®.»...,,ICU IDID1(Loss »»»»aIDs4Cycle sLengst'ns %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) sSprings »,terser--icn422 ea Canyon»Dr,s. „ Rd /, Golden Cycle (sect: 100 sCriticalsVol./Cap. (x): 1.205 Loss Time (see): 10 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): x-ocicxx OpcimalID`ycle: Level Service: sOf »wID»®p<IDID.»�sss»sIDsss»e,sssEast sBound F Acorgach: »sssIDID,»,sssssss,,,» North Bound South Bound West Bound Movement: L- T _ R L _ m - R L - T ------------ - R ---------------- _1111------`-----I--------------- L - T - R Ccntro_: Protected Proteczed Protected I-- Protected -- Rights: Include Ovl Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b Lanes : 0 1 0 2 C 1 2 0 2 0 1 2 D 2 0 0 b 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 Volume Module: PM _______-_____- - I Base Vol: 338 539 409 319 627 601 215 996 317 259 686 284 Growth Ada: ,.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.D4 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initia'_ Bse: 352 561 425 332 652 625 224 1036 330 269 713 1.04 A Added Vo'_: 0 1C 0 21 32 138 44 0 295 PasserByvoi: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Initla: Fut: 0 0 0 0 0 35: 571 425 353 684 763 268 1036 330 0 D 269 713 0 User Ad-. _.00 _.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 302 1.00 PnF Ac_,: Pr-:= VC:ume _.02 _.cc 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ke_�-r VJ' 57: 425 353 684 763 268 1036 330 269 713 302 rte c'-7e� '✓c- C 0 C G 0 0 0 0 0 0 P:7F A^ __I 571 425 353 684 763 268 1036 330 269 713 302 _.00 i.o1 1.00 1.0C 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-.00 1.00 1.0c 11.00 1.0c 1.00 ..00 1.00 1.00 1.0c 1.00 1.00 VC 1111 --42E 353 684 763 268 1036 330 --------------- .--------------- il------------- 269 713 302 Sa_.--a:�--'- A"-us-7er.c. _ ..-------- -EC= 16CC 1600 1600 1600 160C 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Lartes. -,,, _.00 _.00 1.00 1.0C ' -.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Sa_.. ...00 1.O0 2.O, 2.0C 1.00 2 -OC 2.00 .OD 1.00 2.00 1.O0 - ---- _6C" 32CC 1600 3200 3200 1600 3200 3200 1600 1600 3200 160C Zana_-:" A.::�_ ..1111 Xooule_ V�'%Sa= - -_ _.__ 0.27 0.11 0.2: 0.48 0.06 0.32 0.2'_ 0.17 0.22 0.19 .- .......>........<..,,,...,..,,...»>,,.,.<....<.H......»..»»..»e.,,«ID,»,,.,»IDs.»e,.a»,.. 'gaff -x _.5.-- (c! 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP MITIGE - OY w/o P PM Fri Feb 22, 2002 16:47:44 ______________________ Page 1-1 Extended Stay America Traffic Impact Analysis Diamond Bar, California Onening Year ___________________________________________________________ 2004 Without Project Conditions Level of Service Computation Report ... .w,.21; !:,Loss a„.Cycle wLencz.-*�)wMethod (Future Volume Alternative) Intersecticr #2 Brea Canyon. Rd / Golden Springs Dr '"'>H•*m*•w.,.,.ww..o-¢v.wwwo-ww,ma..swwwwwmwwwo-sao...awsa..®w.w,..woo-.wr,. Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.876 Loss Tame (sec): 10 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxXx Optimal Cycle: 89o- wmewo-.swaawwwauxwx Level Of Service: D Approach: North Bound eenemrwwwwwaammww.arrwmewwaaexeo-wawamnwa South Bound East Hound West Hound Movement: L - T - R L- T R L T R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rlghts' Ov- Ignore Include Ovl M - r.. Greer: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 ------------ f---------------� 1 0 2 0 1 Vc'_ume Module: PM _II_______________ Base VC=: 338 539 409 319 627 601 215 996 317 259 666 284 Growth Ad;: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 '625 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial 9se: 352 561 425 332 652 224 1036 330 269 713 295 Addeo vol: C 10 G 21 32 138 44 0 0 Passernvvoi: 0 C G O O O 0 0 7 In_t_a' Fut: 352 571 425 O 0 0 353 684 763 26B 1036 330 0 D 269 713 302 User Ad: :. G:: �.OG 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -0c _.00 1.00 _.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ReCc.t 57 425 351 664 0 266 1036 330 269 713 302 .--_ Redcced 1,,., C G C 352 57: 425 C C 0 0 0 0 353 684 p 268 1036 330 0 0 269 713 0 -_ Ad- ..00 ..00 _.CC _.0C '_.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 302 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ---- _`__ 57. .42_ ----..--------------- 353 684 0 268 1036 330 269 713 302 --------------- ------------_--� Sa,,-ar:e. Aa 16 i60C 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 -cst-.et. -.22 -.00 _.OD i.00 1.Oc ..oc 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 S.=_ _-.00 ;.DC 32C- 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.28 0.72 1.00 2.00 1.00 ___-�- _ -1=.. 160C ------- -i.---------------..--------------- 3200 320^ 1600 320C 3641 1159 1600 3200 ---------------i 1600 ...............<>.......... c" ,,. ,_' ..,...>..o-.w®w.,w.«,..<.waw+w.ww,.wo-o-w.n.,.w.o-ww.,,:wo-ma C..: ,..2_ D.OD c.DB 0.28 0.28 0.17 0.22 0.19 Tra:crx-_E ,- 20c: Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP OY w/o P PM Thu Feb 21,2002 1'5:19:38 __-®_______.,__________ ______ ______________ Page 8-1 Extended Stay America Traffic Impact Analysis Diamond Bar, California _______________ Opening Year 2004 Without Project Conditions _____________________ ____________________ Level Of Service Computation Report *@•...ICU !(Loss snas Cycle @Length a�) Method (Future Volume Alternative! Inte.sect icr,43®Prea Canyon. Rd@ 60&Fwy W�Ramostr�••��®.a....„..» Cycle (sec;: 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y -R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.996 Optimal Cvcle: 180xxxxxx Service: .. ....»..<..>...a ..<..,......».g..m=..e.el Of E Appy0acn: Ne th Hound South Bound Eas- #Hound *oW -T - R L - '" West Bound ------------ - R -------- --------------- Control: Ri I g Protected permitted II __��_______________ Split Phase Split Phase Mir.. Green: Include include Include 0 Include Lanes: 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 00 C 0 0 0 0 2 C 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 1 Volume Module: PM ' - �l_______________ Base Vol: 385 642 0 0 1242 344 0 0 Growth Adi: 0 _.04 _.09 1.04 ..09 1.04 1.04 1.09 1.04 1.04 315 2 597 I.n._tla: Bse: 40C 666 0 0 1292 358 0 1.04 1.04 1.09 Aide,=. Vcl: 0 0 C 6'- 0 328 2 621 PasserByVol: 0 19. 106 D 0 D C D D 0 0 34 In:t_a: Fuc: D 0 0 0 0 C, D 723 G 0 1983 469 0 0 0 0 User Ad- _.0� 0 0 ..C� _.00 _.00 -.00 _.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 328 2 1.00 1.00 655 1.00 PH7 vclume4C.. 1.00 ..00 1.0;, `_.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 729 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 Reduce Vc,- C 1483 464 0 D 0 328 2 655 Reduced Vo:729 V 0 0 C 0 0 0 D "` 0 0 0 0 PCE Ac_ :.�„ 0 1983 964 0 0 0 328 2 655 M'-7 A-- _.C;. ..CO _.00 1.00 ..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fin-- 1� '_.00 ..00 _.00 1.00 - 1.00 •^ l2" 1.00 1.00 1.00 -- y D C 1983 969 0 -- D 0 328 2 655 �" -_``- ---- ---- :60J 160', 1600 1600 1600 16oC 1600 1600 1600 1600 a: - ..r.e_ -•DC -Do 100 .- . 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 _ -. _.�� :..C� C.CC - =.00 .,OC C -OD C.00 O.00 0.66 0.01 1.33 _ 320. 1600 0 __ C 0 --'-----_'--_--I- 1065 7 2128 �ana�- .,..�_ -.._. ..__..__--'-�-- ------ - --- �0 --------------- VC' /Sac _ ..-_- .... es .. CC 0.00 -.4C 0.29 C 0 0.00 0.00 .. o... 0.31 0.31 0.31 Tra`_`ix ?._.___-c, 2001 Dowling Asset Licensed to RY ENGINEERING GROUP MITIGS - OY w/c P PM ____-___-A______..__e--_--a__-m_®m---------------------e__________ Fri Feb 22, 2002 12:55:09 Page 1-1 Extended Stay America Traffic Impact Analysis Diamond Bar, California Opening Year 2004 Without Project Conditions __________________________________________________________________va_ Level Of Service Computation Report. «. ..,.®4mmm,aa.ammo,aaaaaaammm<amaaammamamamamaaaaamam 1(Loss as Cycle Length §) Method (Future Volume Alternative) lnttepseoteon ..e�Q�px.,.,.aaw,e.,aa�,ea�.>awa4n�Y..r+=ease,.mea.o�a�aaeb»&a�xwrvmo..,a,.a�anna� #33 Brea Canyon » maaammmamaaaaammmam». Rd / 60 Fwy W Ramps Cycle !sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.916 Loss Time (sect: 10 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Belay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Op`#map Cvcmv.le maaaa109 seas.ammamaamaamwma>a«aamaam>amaaaam.ammammaaaa,.mmammamaaamm Level Of Service: E Ap'croac: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movemec[ : ------------ L - T - R --------------- L - T - R L - T - R Ce.^.tro- Protected II --------------- Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Include Include Include Include Min, Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 Lanes: ------------ 2 0 2 0 C --------------- 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------ 0 1 0 1! 0 1 Vciume ^'cdule: PN Base Vc=: 385 642 0 0 1242 344 0 0 0 315 2 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 597 1.04 1.04 1.04 Iai;:tal 2se: 400 668 0 0 1292 356 0 0 0 328 2 621 Addec Vcl: C 61 C 0 191 106 0 0 0 0 PasserBVVo'_. C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 4000 729 0 0 0 1483 464 0 0 0 0 0 0 328 2 655 Oser _ 1.Oc -.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P._ _.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 x.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 "'_�--- 40C 729 0 0 1483 464 0 0 0 328 2 655 '.__. C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Recce- 40C 729 0 0 1483 464 0 0 0 328 2 655 _.CC - .CG ..00 _.00 1.00 _.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 "�-� _ ..CC _.CC 1.00 ..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 '-"-- '--- ------------ 4 C C ?21 C - ------------I,--------------- C 1483 464 0 0 0 328 2 655 -------------- ----------- Sa,. L'7. e 160- 1600 1600 1603 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 tic_�s:Te'= •...- ..00 1.00 1.O0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 _ane_ =.:: :. �.CC C.0o 0.00 2.29 0.7_ C.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.01 1.99 =-_.a- S'--- -- 3ZCC .32CC C ---------- 0 3656 1144 0 0 0 --------------- 1600 7 3193 --------------- '-- ��= ...__ C- CC C.00 C.41 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.29 0.21 oo.aaeaoe>o.a.„ao Woad....aooameaooaaaamammaoaoaaamnaeaoaamam aaa •.a-_'iX L'S ;c; 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP MITIGS - OY W/o P PM Fri Feb 22, 2002 19:24:09 __-_______--ilii---_________________________ilii_ Page 1-1 Extended Stay America Traffic Impact Analysis Diamond Bar, California Opening Year 2004 Without Project Conditions ___________________________________________________ Leve'_ Of Service Computation Reocrt ICU I(Loss ss«ad««««<e<«Length ) Method (Future Volume Alternative) lnzersea-,Brea .,a««o.and « /«60«Fw « Ramps Cycle Cycle (sec): 100 �m Critical�Vol./Cap. (x):0..820«..«« Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxxx optimal*C«yclle$*«.«« 71 Level Of Service: D Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Moveme::t: L - , T - R L _ _ R L _ r -------- -----------'---. - R .. - T _ R Conero_: Protected � -I-_'_--------- -I�- Permitted Split Phase --_-__- Slit Phase p ------! R_ahcs: Include Ignore Include Include Mir.. Green; 0 0 C 0 C 0 0 0 Lanes: 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------- ---I;____----_----- Volume Moduli----------- PM �I---------------II ---I Base Vol: 385 642 0 0 1242 344 0 0 Grow.- Ads: 1.04 _.04 1.04 0 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 315 2 1.04 1.04 97 1504 Initial Bse: 40C 668 0 0 1292 358 0 0 Added Vol: C 6: 0 0 0 19: 328 2 621 Passer9yVol: 0 0 0 106 0 0 0 0 0 34 Initio: Fut: 4CC 729 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1483 464 0 0 0 0 D User Ad; _.OG ..Oc ..OG 0 _.OG _.00 O.00 i.DO 1.00 _.00 328 2 1.00 1.00 655 1.00 PH7 AC- ..GC _.00 ...00 7c_cme: 4_.. '.29 _.00 a.Ot O.CC _.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.O0 1.00 Reg'.:=� n n C 1483 0 0 0 C 328 2 655 Reauced �. ,._ V 72° 0 ` 148 C 0 O 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 P`- A°- - -.00 0 ..CG :.00 C.CC x.00 1.00 1.00 328 2 1.00 1.00 655 1.00 c. 0.0C ..00 1.00 ..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 c__- y 729 - ----------- ' ------------- 0 ` ---i C C 0 --------------- 328 2 655 --------------- _ . Sat; Laae_ _E - :6CG 16CC 1600 1602 160D 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 _.00 La.^.es. �_ :.00 _.0.1, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 _ -,Cr 0.0t sa,------ -.2- c_OG ;.GO C.00 0.00 c.oc 0.00 x.00 0.01 1.99 --:a_ -------- - 480- C 480- C 0 D 0 --------------- --------- I--------------- 1600 7 3193 °'-'-.-----.�� C.CC D.00 ,,.3_ C.00 C -OC U.00 0.00 0.20 0.29 0.21 Tra`f_x = ---= (C- 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP OY w/o P PM Thu Feb 21, 2002 15:19:38 _-_.._®___________________________________________°o__________ Page 9-1 Extended Stay America Traffic Impact Analysis Diamond Bar, California Opening Year 2004 without Project Conditions ____e________________________m__--__---___-__--_______-_-________ Level Of Service Computation Report wKww.«.aCTJ 1w1osswab.wCycle %) Method (Future olume Alternative) www®wLengthlterati w/ e Intersection #4 Brea Canyon RdLycoming St «gW>ww.ws.w.w�.wwa«w,�w,oww.ww,.,�.4m4...o,o-wwwwwgw,.«e,�tiowwmwwww,.»www„�.www,�.�wwwwwa,..m Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.986 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal 176 Level Of Service: wCyole..ww vwawessaw<„ww.gm.:wwwwwwwsmewwwwwwww.�w.wawwwawwmogwowxwwwewsww,.. E Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound west Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ ------------- Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rigr,ts, Include Include Include Include Mir.. Green 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: ------------ 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 i 0 0 1 I-----------------------------II--`------`--` 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Volume Module: PM Base Vol: 200 892 129 38 1272 80 78 55 221 114 50 15 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial 8se: 208 928 134 40 1323 83 81 57 230 119 52 16 Added Vol: 0 95 0 21 297 0 0 0 0 Passer3yvo'_: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 7 Init.a_ pun: 0 208 IC23 134 61 1620 83 87 57 230 0 0 119 52 0 23 Use, Ad_: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHp mac_: _.00 :.CC _.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PF.-',c-,-e 206 1023 134 61 1620 83 81 57 230 119 52 23 rt-' %cl '.,._. C O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 Rehcte� 208 1023 13; 61 1620 83 al 57 230 119 52 23 P^- n _ i.oc _.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 _.00 1.001 1.011 1.00 1.0C ..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ,.00 ----------- 2OF 1023 134 61 1620 83 81 57 230 -- j 119 52 23 Mcduie ________• 1600-600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Ad-.a ='ne7' i.011 '.CO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0o ..00 1.00 1.00 1.001 Lanes: Final5'_.- -•O� 2.00 ;..00 1.00 2.0C i-00 C.59 0.41 1.00 '_60C 0.70 0.30 1.00 -------- 33206 1630 1600 3200 160L 938 662 1600 ---------------I --------------- 1112 488 1600 --------------- 11 - �� ...32. C.CS 0.04 0@51 O.OS C.09 0.09 0.14 0.11 0.11 0.01 2001 Cowling Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP MITIGS - OY w/o P PM Fra i Feb 22, 2002 13.05:06 __________________ Page 1-i Extended Stay America Traffic Impact Analysis Diamond Bar, California Opening Year 2004 Without Project Conditions ___________________________ _____________________ Level Of Service Computation: Report ICU ,a�,y,;,FW !(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future v ........... »......#m®....@.� olume Alterna[ivei Inte#section 4, Rd / Lyccm,no�St. ...<..<... .......®...<. ...®.. Cycle (sec'.: �WgeartCanyon you CriticalpVol./Capp (X): 0.835 Loss Time (sect 10 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (.see/veh): xxxxx.x On--rnalCycle: yc• Level Of Service: ...o-. D AcProach: Nor::n Bound South Bound East Ea s[ Bound Bo..«,......,�est- Bo..>.»� Wes[ Sound Movement; L _ _ �- R - - R L ------------!-- --- -Y --- --- - Control: Permitted Permitte `�i--------------- Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Mir.. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 p p 0 ---------------------------��----------- D 1 D 0 1 ----------------- Volume Mcduie: PM _______________' Base Vc�: 200 892 129 38 1272 80 78 55 204 119 Grc�tr. Ada ,� _.C, _.04 ..09 1.04 1.09 1.09 1.04 1.04 a.09 ,230 1.09 1.04 04 15 1.04 In:t.a. bse: 20e 928 _"4 40 1323 83 81 57 'O 119 52 16 Acde- Vol: 95 22 29-C 0 0 0 rasserB yVc:. p 0 0 0 7 Fut. 0 0 0 203 .023 '139 61 1620 8] 81 57 230 119 52 User Ad,. PHr _.0C ..00 OC 1.00 1.03 i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 23 1.00 Ac,: PPF VcijMe: _.0� -.CC _,00 1.00 1.00 i.0.^, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.00 Redac[ lc-' 205 1023 134 61 162C 83 81 57 230 119 52 23 ReducecVc - C C 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 205 _cm3 139 6: 1620 H3 81 57 0 0 0 PC-- _ 230 :.C:.' _.DC ..c0 _.00 _.CC 1.00 1.00 1.00 ..00 119 52 1.00 1.00 23 1.00 r'"- C- - -C _.cc :.00 _.DC :.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ,,.--- -34 0_ 1620 8 el 57 230 - ---------------------- ---------------..--------------- 1: 119 52 --------------- 23 _6- ISC; 16CC 160C 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 � 1600 :.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 _.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.85 C.15 0.59 0.41 1.00 0.70 0.30 1.00 _`_•�- �_-_--- -�-_ -1-- 1600 1600 4560 234 938 662 1600 -- PPPPPP------- --, 1112 488 1600 '� ; s_;s__ ..a❑a=_;',r. ..n ---- ----------li------- N,c Buie: 3.32 D.08 0.C4 0.35 0.35 C.09 0.09 C.14 0.11 0.1: 0.01 Traff_z-_- (c) 2001 CoWlinq Assoc. Licensed to RX ENGINEERING GROUP ICU CALCULATIONS - OPENING YEAR (2004) WITH PROJECT OY w/ Pro? AM Thu Feb 21, 2002 16:34:09 ____---_-.._--a_____---___ Page 7-1 Extended Stay America Traffic Impact Analysis Diamond Bar, California Opening Year 2004 Conditions _______________________________________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report .......!....(LOSS as Cycle Length� Method (Future Volume Alternative) inzersect1c,L416CaFwyEas¢ Ramns / Golden Springs Dr Cycle isec.: 100 LLLS.amm La naSn Critical Vol./Cap. (X): ,,.>®SSSS 0.735 Loss TiMe (sec): 10 (Y+R 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxwxxx Level Of Service: n�LLLm.L.>a14SaLS.na«msanaa LaLaLL.nmavL«oasaaLnLnanL«manamannnnaeansaanannaeaL C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Sound Movement: L - T - R L - T - RL - T - R L - T _ R Con -------------- -II Split Phase Split Phase Protected ---- Protected --I Rights, s Include include Include Ovi Min, Gr Green: C 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 0 C 0 0 1 0 1' 0 0 1 D 0 0 0 - 2 0 1 - 1 0 2 0 1 Volume ',: _ _________ Base Vc-: 23 15 10 433 3 51 202 377 11 2 820 Ad,: 1 . 04 _ . 04 1.04 1.04 1 . 04 1.04 1 .04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 394 1.04 in_t:a_ Bse: 24 16 10 450 3 53 21D 392 11 2 853 Added Vol. 0 0 10 126 C 0 0 410 Passer5yVo-: 23 0 0 0 0 0 2 6 42 In:t:a.: _,_. 0 0 0 0 0 24 16 20 576 3 53 210 415 11 0 0 p User A-;: PH 1.0� -.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4 859 1.00 1.00 452 1.00 Ad-. rH-. Vc:ume: -.00 _.DO 1.00 x.00 :.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ReC'-= `. 24 16 20 576 3 53 210 415 11 4 859 452 � -- ,, G 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 16 2C 576 3 53 0 0 0 P"= 210 415 11 -.0- -.DC 1.00 :..00 :.DG 4 859 452 1.0G 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 53 210 415 11 9 859 452 A�-''" -``�' 1667 1600 i600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 -•-- --�- _.0^^ ,.DO 1.00 _.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 °L "'- - 2- C.34 1.82 0.0: 0.17 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 "' 6-'` 4'_ 54` 2916 '6 26c 1600 3200 1600 ----- 1600 3200 1600 Cara--_' :,na_ysis - .,--------------� ------------- ?Iodine --------------- 04 C.04 0.20 C.2t C.2C 0.13 0.13 0.01 0.00 0.27 0.28 Traff_x 7.5.1___ icl 2001 Dowlina Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP MITIG6 - OY w/ Pro; A,1 Fri Feb 22, 2002 18:28:40 __________________________________________.._--_--__-__-___--_______ Page 1-1 Extended Stay America Traffic Impact Analysis Diamond Bar, California Openino Year 2004 With Project Conditions ____________________________________________________________________ Level of Service Computation Renort .. ..ICU .I( oss .,, as Cycle. Length,�Method *(Future esAlte,nati e.p».....<. intersection svolu 41 6CFwv4Eas' Ramps Golden Springs Dr Cycle (sec;. 100 Critical gVo*,/Cap.> X):O.73**.... Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+P. = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx OPL_' a.Cycle: Of Service: C ..w.....5...<.........« >..Level Approach: Norte Bcund South Bound East: Sound West Bound Movemen_: --------- L - _ - R L - _ - R L - T - R -- R Control: Sp11t Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Rights: lr_clude Include Include Ignore Min. Green: 0 0 0 D 0 D 0 0 0 0 Lanes. C 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1! 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 ------------ !---------------� 1 0 2 0 1 Volume Module: ------ ----` Base Vol: .23 15 10 433 3 51 202 377 11 2 820 394 Growth. Adi: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 'i6 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 24 10 45C 3 53 210 392 11 2 853 410 Added Vc':: ., C 10 126 0 0 D 23 0 Passer9vVo_. ., 0 0 0 0 C 2 6 42 0 0 0 D 0 0 Fcr: Use_ - 24 _6 2C 576 3 53 210 415 11 4 859 452 ., _.0C _.OD _.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 -,0= -.CC _.OD _.00 :.05 -G_ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 FH- vo-';Me 24 2C 576 3 5-, 210 415 11 4 859 0 Redcct Vo1. C G 0 C 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 Reduce' Vcl. 2.; le 20 576 _ 210 415 11 0 4 859 r-_ Ad-- _.GC _.00 -.DC -.00 :.00 _.Ce 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 1.00 1.00 0.00 Ac. 1.00 1.0c x.00 -.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 5_na: .__.. ------- ---- �- _- 2^ 576 _ 53 210 415 11 9 855 0 S.a- :. a .^._ Ad -u -�_ --,-: i6 EC 160C 16[): 160C 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 --77e7- -'0- - �- -.0� ..00 :.OG i.00 -00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ,- -. �.34 1.82 �.C'_ 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 'e___ - '- 5"= 2916 -- 268 1600 320C 1600 1600 3200 1600 Tra=-`r. _.---- 200' Dowl_na Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP OY w/ Proj AM Fri Feb 22, 2002 11:47:16 ________-___ __ _________ Page 4-1 Extended Stay America Traffic Impact Analysis Diamond Bar, California Opening Year 2004 With Project Conditions _______________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report lµµµ&(µLoss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ln--e#sect4on.µ92 Brea Canyon Rd / Golden Springs Dr Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R a 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.024 Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: xxxxxx m»®aa eoem>mmamem,..µemmamwaamex.mammemm.rmn F A�proaci:: North Bound Scutt. Bound East Bound Movemen^ : L - - - R m West Bound R L - ' T - R ------------ L - T - R 2cn!---. R'9•'t= Protected Protected Protected I Protected Min. Green: Include Ovl Include C 0 Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 C ------------ 0 1 2 0 2 0 10 ------- 0 2 0 1 VoIL'me MC❑i: �'P: AY ! ---i Base Vol: Grod r. Ad]: 203 366 282 187 423 526 312 491 191 i 04 232 700 6 In_t:a'_ Bse: . 1.09 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.09 1.04 1.04 21: 381 293 1.09 1.04 1.04 04 Added Vc_: 194 440 547 324 511 199 0 34 241 728 646 Passezr2vvol: 0 8 9 51 159 p C C 0 0 0 29 -n=t-a- Fu-. 0 0 c 0 0 0 0 2'_: 415 293 2C2 449 598 483 511 0 0 0 Use=-'. 199 ..C, ...00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.00 l.00 1.00 241 728 670 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 915 293 2C2 499 596 483 511 .00 1241 1728 1.600 199 70 C 0 0 0 2-- 41' 293 202 445 596 9B3 Sli 0 0 0 199 _.00 _.00 i.0c _.00 1.0C 1.00 1.00 1.00 291 728 1.00 1.00 670 . 0% _.0C ..00 1-0C 1'00 _.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.o0 1.00 1.00 1.00 -- ��� 2C- 949 598 4B3 511 199 241 728 670 --------------- ---------------� "�- --�"` --... 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 _ane- 1.00 1.O0 i.00 1.00 1. OC 1.00 -'- -.CC 1.00 2.0C 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.O0 1-0,'2.00 2.00 1.00 C 1.00 2.00 1.00 ---_ -== --�� 1600 32CC 320,^, 1600 3200 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 "r- C.06 �.14 0.37 C. L`- C.16 0.12 0.15 0.23 0.42 T=om ---- (C. 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP MITIG8 - OY w/ Proj AM Fri Feb 22, 2002 18:30:0_ _______________________________ __________________________________ page 1-i Extended Stay __---------`--- America Traffic Imnact Analysis Diamond Har, California Ooeninc __-------- Year 2004 With Project Conditions - ---------`-------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU !(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Al Inte�rsecti= 92QBrea »Canyon Rd ! Golden Ser-,nos DrWa*»..,...,,,,.e....,, Cycle (sec): 100`..».o.�..« AR�a CriticalaVol./Can. (X): 0.813 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): Optimal Cycle: 70 Level Of Service: xxxxxx Wry aBound� D Approach: Nort:: Bound South Boum Sast �R.e.Wests« Boum m ... .. Movement: .. - - R r_ T .. - - - F. L ____________ _ ____T_______ _____________ Cl: ontroProtected -- Protected Protected � ------------- Protected Rights: Ov_ Ignore Include Ovl Min. Green: G 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 2 0 2 D 1 0 2 0 2 0 ,2 0 2 0 0 D ------------!----- ----------I�--------------- _ 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 Volume Module : Al ---------- -_---�I- ---------" --- Base Vol: 203 366 282 187 423 526 312 491 191 232 700 621 Growth Adj: ... 04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 initial Bse. 21: 38i 293 194 440 547 324 511 199 241 728 Addec Vol: 34 0 8 9 51 159 0 646 Pa sse r3yvoi: C 0 D C. 0 C 0 0 24 Inrtia= ?u 2_= 415 293 C 0 C 202 445 596 483 51- 199 0 0 241 728 0 670 User Ad- _.Ci ..00 _.00 1.oC _.00 0.CC _.00 ?.OG 1. 00 x.00 1.00 1.00 PHAd- "D-' -.00 -.011 PH' Vcl=e: _.00 :.CO C.DC '.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ..00 211 41- 293 Reduct Vol: 202 449 C 483 511 199 241 72B 670 _ C D Recuce '✓c'_: 2__ Y'= 293 C 0 C 0 0 0 202 449 C 483 511 199 0 0 241 C P`= Ac,. i.,;__.00 -.DO 1.0C 1.00 0.00 ,.00 1.00 1.00 728 1.00 1.00 670 1.00 ML A---: - �. -.3C _.00 Fina-Vc---- 1. 0C _.00 0.DC _.OG i.00 ..00 `202 1.00 1.O 1.00 -- �; 1 293 445 0 483 51_ i99 ---'---------- 241 7228 670 Sar���.__.,.. r__... ..�.. -e------. ------`------I 1---------------. Sat'Larie ---- _6 �.. ',6CC Ad,u=_t�,ecr 160: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 -.,,- -_.OD -.GC _.00 -.DC _.00_.00 _.CO 1.00 1.00 1.00 `.`'i 1.00 2.0 2.00 'AC 2.00 2.16 0.84 �-0C 2.00 1.00 . -..d. _ - --------- --------- 16,3- 3200 3456 1344 1600 3200 1600 az Vc1.'Sa: �...-....06 u.19 E.DC 0.15 0.?5 0.15 0.23 0.42 tC, 200'. Dowlir.c Asscc. „_tensed to RA: ENGINEERING GROUP OY w/ Prol AM Thu Feb 21, 2002 16:34:09 __________________..____ ---------------------------------------- Page 9-1 xtended Stay America Traffic Impact Analysis Diamond Bar, California Opening Year 2004 Conditions _________________________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report .p»IpLcsspaspCycle Length %)» Method »(Future Volume Alternative) lnLersecz:c, Canyon t(»,. 6C Fwv W Ramps Brea. Rd»/ Cycle (sec): 100 »p»o-p86Critical »Vol./Cap.(X) Loss Tune (sec): 10 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh):0.940 Optimal Cycle: 125 - Level Of Service: Xcxxxx E App.oac`:, North Bound South Bound East Bound Movement: L- T - - L T- West Bound R L- T Contrci. Protected II--------------- Permitted Split Phase II_____________ R_ah:_: Include Include Split Phase M -n. Green: 0 0 0 Include Include Lanes0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o z o 0 0 - --------- I --------- l 0 0 0 0 0 o p if 0 1 vci'smc Module: ____II___________ ----I Base Vo-: 479 826 0 0 779 156 0 Gro','!: Ad;: T_n_t_a'_ Sse: .. .04 1.04 1.04 0 1.09 , .04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.004 34 4 1.04 783 1.04 498 B59 C 0 810 162 0 0 Added vC_: C 217 0 0 C 68 371 0 814 PasserB y';c1: C O 0 42 0 0 0 0 0 126 Fut: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 498 1076 00 0 878 204 0 0 0 User - pc l.oc 1.00 0 1.00 l.oc l.oc 1.00 1.00 1.00 371 0 940 Pr_ Ad-- ,.CC 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ..- Vc -^. '�-: 49n 1076 p 0 870 204 1.00 1.00 L.00 tecact .:_ r, C 0 0 C 0 0 371 0 940 Red ,: '. �._ 496 1076 0 0 0 0 87B 200 0 0 0 0 0 "_ed - " - _.00 _.00 ..00 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 371 0 1.00 1.00 940 •_•-- .^` _.0= _.00 _.00 x.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 _.. 49c lC76 '6 D 0 678 204 p p 0 --------------- 371 0 940 n'> p'o-°`-T,'"- 'ED- 1600 1600 160C 1600 1600 16001600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Lane:- -00 -.00 1.00 -..,- �� 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 320' 320C 0 C.00 2.00 1.0C O.00 0.00 0.00 0.57 xxxx 1.43 ------------ 0 3200 160C 0 0 0 -------I----------------I---------------I 906 0 2294 Module-"_-�•------- Cr_- .,.CO 0.00 C.27 0._3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91 0.00 0.41 T'as=_- -.__i5 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP MITIGB - OY wi Pro• AM Fri Feb 22, 2002 15:51:08 ________________________________m__-__-_e_--____-__-_____- Page 1-1 Extended Stay America Traffic Impact Analysis Diamond Bar, California Opening Year 2004 With Project Conditions _____________________________________________________________ Level Of Service Computation. Report »»»»»»»»C »...os>»as» Cycle »Length »%) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Incrosec,...e».3 Brea 7anVor:nRd / 6C Fwy®W Ramps»».»nn.»..»»,�.»».+..,,nW»»m»,.ffig.»». Cycle (sec': 100 >nnn»Critical nVol*/Can, (k)»nnn»n».Q C...»»„nn»» C.776 Loss Time isec, 10 (1'+R = 4 seci Average Delay (sec/veh): 62 Service: xxxxxx ......«.> ..............»»nn..,»».n..»<.»Level »»Ofn Approacn: »nnn».n„»nn..n»nnn»»ann». Ncrtc Sound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movemenn: L- - R i - L - R ------------ ---------------'!� Control: !----------- ---i�---------------�I------------- Protected Permitted Split Phase Split Phase __ Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: ------------ 2 C 2 C 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------------��---------------H 0 1 0 1! 0 0 1 Volume Module. --------------- Base Vol: 474 826 0 0 779 156 0 0 0 357 0 Grown Ad_: _.04 '_.04 _.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 783 1.04 Sse: -19c 96. 162 0 0 0 2_- 0 0 68 42 G 0 0 C 371 D 0 0 814 126 ln:t_a_ ',._. G G 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 User 999 1;76 0 C 876 204 0 0 0 371 0 940 -.2- P'''` Au - I- _.CO i.Cc _.G1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.O0 1.00 -.0., PHP Vciume: -.00 _.CC 1.00 1.CC _.O0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Redutr '.,,_ 49E: 1076 D 0 876 204 O 0 0 - C 371 0 940 : Reduc e:i 'd c:- G 0 O 0 0 0 0 C 59S _C7c C 0 979 204 0 0 0 D 0 P''-` " D i'00 1.00 1.00 371 0 1.00 1.00 940 1.00 -.0^ OC _.00 1.00 1.00 1.O0 i .00 1.00 1.00 6?e 204 C 0 0 ---------------------------.--------------- 371 0 --------------- 940 j .-.. .. __.-"-.--- -__ '6C-- -., ,,- _6C-- 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 _.C., _. - _. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ...0 _.'= 0.�, O.00 D.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 ------ "__ -`-- ---- - C 3894 900 0 D 0 -- - ---- - 1600 0 3200 ata___. ;..'�_vs_c >:od,;,,----. ---..- - ------------�---------------, X0.23 .... _34 .,.C2.,.23 0.2., O.00 D.00 0.00 .... 0.00 0.29 TtaF`=:` -__-` �_20G_ Dow_:,^,c Assoc, Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP OY w/ Prod AM Thu Feb 21, 2002 16:34:09 ____________________ page 10-1 Extended Stay America Traffic Impact Analysis Diamond Bar, California Opening Year 2004 Conditions ___-______._____________________®_-_____-______----______ Level of Service Computation Report « ICU l(Loss««as Cycle «TMLength «8)»Method »(Future Volume Alternative) lutessec<,cn 44 Brea Canyon. Rd«/ Lycoming St«»»��»»»•»»»m«.«,.»«<«».,....»..».«®»« Cycle ;sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.936 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh)o Optima- Cycle:122 Leve' Of Service: Xxxxxx F««. «»*«««»»»»«» E Approac: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movemect: L - T - R L - - R L -------- I Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted _ Permitted Riahts: Include Include Include Include Mir.. Greer.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes. 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------I---------------I!--------------- 1 0 1 0 0 l Volume Module:I I--------------- I--------------- Base Vci: 309 1247 60 16 560 82 73 60 223 141 73 20 Grow . Ad,,: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 ==...a. 2se: 32: 1297 62 19 582 85 76 62 232 147 76 21 Addeo l'c' 0 294 0 16 65 0 0 9 0 Passer9v%'31: 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 48 3 24 Fuc: 321 1591 62 0 0 37 647 85 76 66 232 0 0 0 195 79 Use- "'Z 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0c :.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 45 1.00 1.00 1.00 PH- ad-.: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PF?F Volume: 321 1591 62 '.__. 37 64'7 85 76 66 232 195 79 45 Reda- 0 0 C C C 0 0 0 0 0 0 Re cute_ :'..__ 321 1591 62 31 647 85 76 66 232 0 195 79 P2-- AJ_ _.0c 1.00 1.00 1.0c 1.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 45 1.00 1.00 1.00 -. 3, _c ..oc l.oc _.oe -.00 I.00 1.00 1.00 ,647 1.00 1.00 1.00 _-•�_-- __: 1591 6:. -- -------- ---'.--- --•---- � 37 85 76 66 232 -------'----------------------I---------------I 195 79 45 :6C- 160C 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1.CC Lane=_ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 :.CC -.02 1.00 F-'na- 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.53 0.47 1.00 0.71 0.29 1.00 ':--._ 1600 32CC 1602 -------- ---- 1600 3200 1600 854 746 1600 1138 462 1600 Mcdule: I----- - --------I Vo:/Sa_. C.�„ ,,.SC 0.04 0.02 c.2C 0.05 0.09 0.09 0.14 0.17 0.17 0.03 ..2._5 .,,., .... Traf_ix 7._._115 (ci 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP MITIGS - OY w/ Proj AM Fri Feb 22, 2002 19:41:19 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 1-1 Extended Stay America Traffic Impact Analysis Diamond Bar, California Opening Year 2004 With Project Conditions --------------------------------`-------------------------- Leve- Of Service Computation Report Ca»a».lacICU I(Loss .c.ec«CCycle %) Method »„Length ate eo Intersection »(Future »Volume«Alter 94 Brea Canyon Rd / Lyccmeng St Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Can. (X): 0.887 Loss Time (sec;: 10 (Y+R = 4 sec) Averag4_e Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx OPt<.yL« Cycle: Of Service: aa.»aLLa9aLevel D Apnroac Nc_ t Bound South Bcund as»*ssEast»Bound «ssss»West Y sBound Cas Movement: L T R L - T - R L - T -------- ------------- Control: Control: -------- _�� Permitted Permitted Permitted --------------- Permitted --- Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 D Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 C ------------ 1 --------------- I--------------- 1 0 1 0 1 Vo'_ume Module: Base Vol: 309 1247 60 18 56C 82 73 60 223 141 73 20 G_'owth Adi: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 ln,tta_ 3se: 321 1297 62 19 562 85 76 62 232 147 76 21 Adced Vol 0 294 0 16 65 0 0 4 0 qg 3 :arse-Bvvol.: 0 0 a o c 0 0 0 0 24 ::'•�[-a_ .,,_. 321 '_591 62 37 64- 85 76 66 232 0 0 195 79 0 45 Use: An- _.�., -.00 _.GO _.00 i.00 -.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PN.: Aon" _.0C 1.00 1.00 _.00 '-.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P -F Vciurr.e: 3Z1 1592 tit 37 647 85 76 66 232 195 79 Reduc,Vo'_. C 0 C 0 C C 45 Reduced Vol:Z 0 0 C S 1591 62 3? 64- B 76 66 232 0 0 195 79 0 45 P-= An _,S�: 1.00 1.00 1.0D „ OC 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ML" A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0C 1.00 1.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -----vdC... 5__ _591 62 3" 647 85 76 66 232 --------------- ---------------II--------------- 195 79 45 s-__-----... --------------- _6C" 1600 1600 160C 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 -.0 _.G1 _.DC i.0: ..Go 1.00 "-.00 1.00 i.00 1.00 1.OG 7a.^.es ---- -.- -.00 1.00 2.65 0.35 0.53 0.47 1.0C 1.00 1.00 1.00 --_- --a---. X200 1600 16CD 424: 559 65, 746 1600 --------------- 1600 1600 160C -�..� -_- -----.--------------- Mcdu- --------------- . V�-�=-� C.5C 0.04 C.02 C -IS C.15 C.09 0.09 C.14 0.12 0.05 0.03 Cr__ Moves: 7.5.-L._ 2001 Dowling Ass= Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP OY W/ Pro, 22, 2002 13:25:37 ------- ______________mFriOFeb ____ Page 7-1 Extended Stay America Traffic Impact Analysis Diamond Bar, California Opening Year 2004 With Project Conditions __________________ _______________________________ Level _________________ Of Service Computation. Report »tr .+..•»»»2000»++MffiUnsig alizedtrMethod (Future Volume Alternative) trBeP�••»•�aa,•»tr.+.>o»»+.+.»rr,r+.o»,.»mo-.,.+®<m.a+,. _ 45 Brea Canyon Rd / West m»»»m»e...»; .7rivewav Average DelayQ(sec/veh): 19.8 Worst Case Level Of Service: Approach: North Hound Mcvemen-: South Bound East Bound++mo- West Bound - - L T R -'--------'--------��--------------- L _T- R L- T R L -T _ R Ccn-ro Uncontrolled " " " =?•ts: P , ��_______________ Uncer.c_o led Stop Sign Stop Sign Include Lanes Include Include Include 0 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 D 0 -- ---------------------------I! 0 0 0 0 0 1 ---------------'I u T r,,.., e 'c_ e Ca _ : AM ---------------11-_ --_----`---� Base Vo:. 0 1609 0 0 935 0 0 GrO �'=� A; -J _.04 1.04 x.04 Inn: ia_ Bse: 0 0 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1673 0 Adzied '•icl: 0 284 D 972 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 59 Passer3vV of C 0 D 2 111 0 0 D 0 0 0 10 ;..:tia: F'.::: 0 1957 59 D C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1083 0 0 User A�_: 1.00 ..00 1.00 Ad-. 0 0 0 0 1D 1.00 i.011 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FFiF Vc_U^,e: 1.00 1.00 _.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 0 -957 59 2 1083 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 10 C 0 0 0 0 S9 9 0 0 2 1083 C 0 10 XXX Y✓; Xxxx xxx xx 4 . 1 XXX:i xxx.xx XXXxx XXXX XXXXX XXXXX 2 . 2 xxxX xxxX 6.9 xr.Xxx Xxxxx ------------ ------ XX -X> XXXXX XXXXX xxxx 3.3 --------------- : XXX Y KX". XXX; -LI: 20-1, XX](X xxy - XXx.:': XxxxX xXxc 979 X xxxx Xxxx 286 xxxx >c,,,cx v. XXXx XXx-'c ,,-r ��: xxxr •; XYcxx �x xxwc 253 2 8 o xxxx xxxxx xxx: __ _ ..-----------� xxxx xxX. xx %cxxx 253 -------- ----- Le.t. - 'V _..._ - .---------------��-------------- - xxx.X ' 177 x cLx XxXxXXXxx>: xxXx XXXXX Xxxxx xxx 19.8 C .x LT - :,'•=.. �" _ LT _ LTR - •'- RT L - LTR - RT ..XXX XXxxx xX-'_:i xXX:'. J(.tiXXX XxXJ: XXXX xxxxx XXXX xxxx .. _ _. _ _ _ _ _ YJ: %v.: •: Xx.X XXXXX Kx-lxx _...._ _ _ _ .- _ _ • xxx-= XX v� XXXY-X XXX)U( XXxx XXXxx xXXXX XXXX XXxxx -••,•=:._-. XX-XXXX XX Y. KX1C]1JCX 19.8 C Dowlit:g Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP OY w/ Proj AM Thu Feb 21, 2002 16:34:09 __________________ Page 12-1 ________________________ Extended Stay America Traffic Impact Analysis Diamond Bar, California Opening Year 2004 Conditions --------------------------------------- Leve'_ Of Service Computation Report - --------------- yw®@gammm�g2000mHCM�Unsignallized Method (Future Volume Alternative; Intersection 96 Lycommmg.S, /mNorth Driveway Average Delay (sec/veh): 12.0 m.mko-gpWorst �Case WLeve' OfmServicegmRmmm.m. mmw..m.mmwmm nm.,.>.mm.mm..mm.mme.mommmmxa.®ww,.mr.n>W.,..mw..e.mm.mmx�.«.>..-a. B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Sound Movement: - T - R L- T - R L - ------------I------------ - R ---I1--------------- L - T - R Control: Ii'--------------��- Ston Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled _ Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 1 ------------ 0 --------------- 0 1 0 C 0 Volume Module: ---I AM ---------------i Base Vol: D 0 D 0 0 0 0 222 Growth Adj: 0 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 0 179 0 1.04 1.04 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.04 Added Vol: 0 231 0 74 0 2 0 0 186 0 PasserByvol: 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 ` 0 0 Fut. 0 0 0 0 0 0 74 D0 2 0 G 0 User Ad;: 0 0 231 23 ..OG 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 _.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2 1866 0 1.00 1.00 PHF Adl: _.00 _.00 1.00 1.O0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ...00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PH: Volume: 7; C 2 0 0 C 0 231 23 2 ReduC- Vcl. C 0 C 0 0 0 0 186 Fina_ vo - 0 0 74 0 3 0 0 0 Cr11ica_ Gat: _ 0 0 231 23 Mcdc3e: 2 186 0 Cr_-ica: Gp: Fo__owUp-gym.. 6.4 xxxv 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxa; xxxxx ,.= xxxr. 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 11 2.2 xxx-x xxxxx Caoac--;- Module _______________I _______________I == VC_: P o � e:: ':a7 433 xxxx 242 xxxx xxxti xxxxx xxxx, xxxx xxxxx 259 xxxx xxxxx _ MC' 5 B4 x1�c . B C - xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1323 xxxx xxxxx e t _--- - _ -': x-= 8 C_ xxxx xxxx xx�c.xx, xxxx xxxx xexxx -- v 13.3 xxxx xxxxx Leve: Cf Ser'.' -':7e -a '-1I---------------11---------------I S t o ^ped C c _ : ;:r_� . •: rxx;: xxxxr xxxxx xxxx xx _Icx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.7 -2E cp Mcvt • m „ xxxx xxxxx Mov e:nen[ Sr.areC Cap. . m L- - _TR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT A LT - LTR - RT Shrd S'-::De_:rx�c xxx>: SBB xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Sharrea LOS: :., 0 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.7 xxxx xxxxx AooraacnDei„ B . . m i 2 . 0 A '* AperoaCGLOS: -XX B „ m xxxxxx .raff_x 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP OY w/ PrO4 PM 21, 2002 16:31:12 _____________ee___-_ -------Thu -Feb Page 7-1 Extended Stay America Traffic Impact Analysis Diamond Bar, California Opening Year 2004 Conditions _____________________________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report _ ««»»»»««C'-'!(Loss as Cycle LengthMethod (Future Volume Alternative) »»»•»»»�°<.<..».»<»»»»»4»«,,,... IP.terseCLicn 91 6C Fwy East Ramps p / Golder. Springs Springs » Dr Cycle (sec:: 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X)»«»»&pY4mp8gg1Ww»»< Loss Time ;sec): 10 (Y+R 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xx.xxxx Optima:. Cycle: 126 Level Of Service: »» °*•«»«..». $« ».»»»»»»...»>«�� E Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement; L - T - R L - T - R I, _ T _ R ------------ --------------- �-------_------- L - - R Control: _ Split Phase Split Phase Protected II"___ - Rights: 9 Include Include Include Protected Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 C Ovl Lanes: 0 0 G 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1: 0 C 1 0 p 0 z a l II--------------- 1 0 2 0 1 Volume Mcdl�le: jj--------------- PM Base Vol: 67 39 15 247 4 44 255 B41 22 20 Growth Ad-, 1.04 _.04 1.04 1.04 04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 592 1.04 1.09 793 1n_tia_ b _. 7C 41 16 257 4 46 265 675 23 1.04 Added Vc-. 0 C 3 61 C 21 616 825 PasserByVc:: 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 11 23 127 In;.tial Fu_: 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 41 19 31B0 = 46 265 864 0 0 User At- 23 ..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ...CC 1.00 1.00 1.00 32 639 952 PAF Ad; 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.oc 1.0: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PH— hc.urlle Reduc= '.o: 70 41 19 316 4 46 265 884 23 32 639 1.00 952 Reduced Vp:: C C 0 0 G 0 D a o 7C 4; 19 318 0 0 0 PG= A;:_ 4 46 265 689 23 D,; oG 32 639 952 L H _ _��• 1.00 oG .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.Do "z 1.00 _.DC _.eG 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 _- - 70 19 318 4 46 265 884 23 -------------- --------------- 32 639 952 _o.. --------------- Mo V=` --------------- I Sar; ane Ac-cscccr 16CC 16pC 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 .- Lar:es. ,, ..00 1.00 _.00 1.0C 1.CC. _.00 1.00 1.00 C 5_ 0.14 1.00 1.00 1.00 .,.31 1.73 0.02 0.25 1.00 2.00 1.00 86: 504 1.00 2.00 1.00 - ---------- 231 2766 36 396 1600 3200 1600 ----- ---- '------ 1600 3200 1600 �anac�•-: ,i.a�ysis -------- --------------- Modcle: Vc�/Sac. Cr__ Move.... G.CF C.08 0.08 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.17 0.28 0.01 «».. e.., 0.02 0.20 0.59 Traffix ,._.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP MITIGB - OY w/ Pro; PM Fri Feb 22, 2002 19:07:12 ______________________ _____________________ Page ,_ _____________________________________ Extended Stay America Traffic Impact Analvsis Diamond Bar, California ________________________________________________________________________________ Opening Year 2004 With Project Conditions Level Of Service COmputation Report ICU '_(Loss as Cycle Length Si Method (Future Volume Alternatives Intersection 41 60 Fwv East Ramps ; Golden Springs Dr »Vol./Cap. Cycie (sec;: 100»»a#�»»@•@»»»»ttCritical (X)0.661»»..< Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R 4 sect Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Op..m,..».o»e...«».»»46 Level Of»» Service: Aonroach: Ncrth Bound Scut: Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: ------------ L - , - R L - T - R L - - R ---------------II-------------- L Contrci: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Riohts. Include Include Include Ignore Mir.. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 _.-�C 0 1 0 2 0 1 ___________________________ 1 0 2 0 1 Volume M^du_e --------------- : PM Base vc--: 67 39 15 247 4 44 255 841 22 20 592 793 Gro'.+t... Ac': _.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 bee: ,C 41 16 257 46 265 875 23 21 616 825 ^--�-�- 0 3 61 .. 0 0 9 0 11 23 127 C C C 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 713 46 265 884 23 32 639 952 User Ad_ ..CC _.CC 1.00 i.00 _'0- _.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 _.cc _.OS _.CC _.00 1.00 _.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PRP Vz_,jme: ._ 41 19 31E 4 46 265 864 23 32 639 0 Red_:c_ `. �. C C 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 7; 4: 19 31^ 4 4E 265 884 23 32 639 0 PCE . c -.,, ,, _..,C _.00 x.00 1.00 _ Oc ,.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 X ;,_ _..,. -.CC _,OC -. p;; _.00 _.00 _.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 4 46265 8B4 23 --------------- --- ------------ --------------- 32 639 0 --------------- 160_ 160C 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 ..00 x.00 _.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i4 - - ��- C.:._ _.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 .. .,-...❑ 160C 320.2 1600 _..._---- --------------- 1600 3200 1600 ..-- - -------- --------------- ---------------I C.08 C.11 t... C.1: Oto» 0.28 0.01 0.02 0.20 0.00 Tra"_, x 7.= ---= ic' 2001 ❑owli::q Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP OY W/ pro; PM Fri Feb 22, 2002 11:48:25 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 4-1 Extended Stay America Traffic Impact Analysis Diamond Bar, California Open-n--Jq Year 2004 With Project Conditions -------- ------------------------------------------------------ Level Of Service Computation Report WKfv4xk1CT2 I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method' (Future Volume Alternative) 42 Brea Canyon Rd / Golden Springs Dr Cv---Ie (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Car). W: -ime Loss (sec): 10 (Y'R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.210 :: OP1mal Cycle: ISO Level Of Service: XXXXXX F Appzoac North Bound South Bound East Bound Movement: L - T - R L T R West Bound ------------ I --------------- 1 --------------- 1i --_____________I!_-__________ Con--rcl: Protected Protected Protected --- P "icints: Include OV1 Protected MiInclude Mia. Green: 0 0 Include 0 0 0 Lanes: 2 0 1 2 0 2 -_-_0_ ---------------------- --------------- --------------- Volume Module: P!'� ----- ---------- Base Vc_-: 338 539 409 319 627 601 215 996 317 GGroat:1.04 1.04 259 86 284 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1n -:1a: Dse 352 561 425 332 652 1.04 1.604 1.04 625 224 1036 330 Added Vol: C 14 269 713 295 0 25 35 161 74 0 PasserByvo', 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'L:�: 0 0 352 575 425 357 687 786 298 1036 330 user 1 1-00 269 713 306 PH- A- .0c 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.c0 1.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P'�7 VCU, 252 575 1.00 1.00 1.00 42E 3E7 687 766 298 1036 330 Redd_ %2�- : 0 269 713 306 1- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T-edLCC7 Vul 352 575 0 0 0 425 357 697 786 298 1036 330 '�.c 269 713 306 '00 -.30 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0c 1.00 1.00 1.00 42' 357 1.00 1.00 1.00 687 786 298 1036 -------- --- - ------------- 330 269 713 306 5:-- --------- 1I --------------- 160' 160_- 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 IGOO 1600 16O0 1600 Lan-- 1'CO -00 -1.01 1.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7- 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 . .- S�. 160 320C 1.00 2.00 1.00 16C0 3200 32C0 1600 3200 3200 ----------- ----, ----------- 1600 1600 3200 1600 --------------- Ca Ana-vsis Mod -ie --------------- Vc-"Sas- C--- ,,18 0.27 0-1 0.21 0.49 0.09 0.32 0.21 r -:::'.'es .... 0.17 0.22 0.19 Tra-:x 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP MITIGS - OY w/ Pro; PM Fri Feb 22, 2002 18:24:36 _______me_____________ Page 1-1 ________________________________ Extended Stay America Traffic Impact Analysis Diamond Bar, California Opening Year 2004 With Project Conditions _________________________________________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report IC12' (LosswasRCycle»#enngtth %) Method (Future Volume Alternative! Intersection ».#.w»wBreaCanyon»Dr R»»/ Golden Springs Cycle (sec): 100 »»»Critical »Voi./Cap. (X)&»»».»»»».«»-^»»».. 0.8., Loss Time (sec): 10 (YrR _ 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): XXXXX Optimal Cycle: 90 Service: ' e»»Of »»»»East »Bound p Approach: w»®»&»»West North Bound South Bound »»* »Bound Movement: L - T - R L - - R L ------------ !------`-- Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: ovl Ignore Include Ovl Min. Green: C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: ------------'------ 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 < D 1 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 D 1 Volume Module: P^; Base Vol: 336 539 409 319 627 601 215 996 317 259 686 284 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 Initia: 3se: 352 561 425 332 652 625 224 1036 330 269 713 295 Added Vol: 0 14 0 25 35 161 74 0 PasserBvvc'_: 0 ^ 0 D 0 0 0 0 11 Initial Fut: 0 0 0 0 352 575 425 357 687 786 298 1036 330 0 0 0 User Adi: ppli Ad- l.oc _.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 O.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 269 713 1.00 1.00 306 1.00 PH- `.c i.Co ..00 1.00 _.00 C.CC _.00 1.00 -.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -'-me: -__ 575 425 35" 687 C 298 1036 330 269 713 306 Rea -c- Vc_- C 0 C 0 0 0 0 Red -`ed `'c- -`- 5'3 425 357 687 C 296 1036 330 269 713 306 _.00 -DC _.Co O.00 1.00 1.00 ..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .._. _.C: _.CC _.00 _.CD ..00 O.00 ..00 :.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.O0 =_'- 575--_42 3_- 6E" 29n 1-036 330 ------------- 269 713 306 SatOn -- --- -----`-------- Sat.'Lane Ad3ust-en, 16C2 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 :.00 16001600 1600 : Lanes .,OC „ OC 1.00 ..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 �-.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ^ "" 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.28 0.72 ... ... :..C- 1.00 2.00 1.00 ''Sa ... 1600 3200 -.... � " - ---�20C loDC 3200 364' 1159 ----------- ',-------------- 1600 3200 1600 --------------- I ---------------j ...16 C.2" 0.-= J.21 C.00 C.09 C.28 0.28 0.17 0.22 0.19 Tri "_=^ 7 Dow- ng Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP CY - w/ - Proj - PM ---------- Thu Feb 21, 2002 16:31:12 Page 9-1 -- -- ---- -- Extended Stay America Traffic impact Analysis Diamond Bar, California Opening Year 2004 Conditions ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) intersectio: #3 Brea Canyon Rd / 60 Fwy W Ramps Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.014 Loss Time fsec); 10 (Y+R = 4 see) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: ISO Level Of Service: F Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Moveme'.IL: ------------ L - T - R I --------------- L T 11 --------------- R L T Protected Permitted 11 --------------- Split Phase 11 --------------- Split Phase Include Include Include Include Min. Green. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: ------------ 2 0 2 0 0 1 --------------- 0 0 2 I ---------------II--------------- 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: PM --------------- Base Vol: 385 642 0 0 1242 344 0 0 0 315 Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1,04 2 1.04 1.04 59*7 1.04 Initial 3se: 400 668 0 0 1292 35B 0 0 0 328 2 621 Added Vol: 0 99 0 0 220 127 0 0 0 PasserDyV:Dl : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 initial wu::i 400 767 0 0 1512 485 0 0 1) 0 0 328 2 User Ab7. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.()0 1.00 1.00 1.00 682 1.00 PH- Ac- .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.C)O 1.00 1.00 1.00 400 767 0 0 1512 465 0 0 0 328 2 682 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 Fled-Jz:eC VC- I0C 767 0 C 1E12 485 0 0 0 328 2 682 PC-- Ac- XL- :.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.C)o 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ac: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -------- - - 40:; 76- 0 -- ------ 0 1512 485 0 0 0 328 2 682 3d: Lz.-- F_cw lodulc :'ane 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 2600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 AC: us -:ger- 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 2.00 0'00 0'" 2'00 1-00 0-00 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.01 1.35 Fird_ Sa- - ----------- 3 -20C 320C' 0 -------------- 0 320C --------------- 160L) 0 0 0 1036 7 2157 Ca ' ca2_� A�"J__" Module: vs13 --------------- --------------- c 0.24 0.00 O -OC 0.47 0 .30 ()-00 0-00 0.00 0.32 0.32 0.32 cr�_ MCVEZ' Trafffix (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP OY W/ Prof PM Fri Feh 22, 2002 13:29:17 ----------------------------------------------- __--------------------------------- Page 5-1 Extended Stay America Traffic Impact Analysis Diamond Bar, California Opening Year 2004 With Project Conditions ______________________________________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1fLoss ass»Cycle »«Length %) Method (Future V01ume Alternative) intersection 43 Brea «CCanyon Rd»/«Go 7wy»W»Ramps .«.«..<»......».«.....«««w«.,..« Cycle (sec): 100 »«Critical tVol../Capin»(X)tl«««»«ttt0.855t»""« Loss Time (sec!: 10 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (.sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Service: ,Cycle: ltt_tt«tttetttt.«...<. » .gteLevel »Of tt»»East tBound D Approach: North Bound South Bound West: ®Bound ».. Movement: L - T - R I, - _ - R L ---------- ------------- Control: Protected Permitted Split Phase Split Phase _ Rights: Include Include Include Include Mir.. Green: C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------ ' ---------------i 0 1 0 1! 0 1 Volume Module: PM --------------- --------------- Base Vol: 38� 642 0 0 1242 344 0 0 Growtn Ad.-: _.04 1.04 1.04 0 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 315 2 1.04 1.04 597 Ini!:.al Bee: 40C 668 0 0 1292 358 0 0 1.04 Added Vol: C 99 0 0 0 220 127 0 328 2 621 Passe:Bvvo'_: 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 Initxa_ Fut: 400 767 C 0 0 0 0 0 15'-2 485 0 0 0 0 0 User Ad ,�: -.00 _.00 ..00 0 1.00 :,OC 1.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 328 2 1.00 1.00 662 PH- Ad-,: _.00 :.00 _.00 1.00 1.cc 1.00 ...OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pr:F Volume: 40' 76" 0 0 1512 485 0 0 Reauc. Vc:: C C 0 0 0 C 328 2 682 Reduced Voir 50C 76- 0 0 0 0 0 0 1512 4B5 0 0 0 0 PC- Ad, _.CS _.00 1.00 0 0 1.00 1.0c 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 328 2 1.00 1.00 682 1.00 MLF Ac_ ..C� _.CC 1.00 1.00 1.0c 1.0D 1.00 _.00 1.00 1.0D 1.00 F-na' \'o:.. 40C 767 „ 1512 485 0 0 0 328. 1.00 -- ---------------'- ------- 2 682 --------------- ! -- _6- 16CC 16DC 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adlust:rP.- - - - i.oC 1.00 _.Cc 1.00 l.0c 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes. ��.,, 0.00 0.0C 2.27 0.73 0.05 0.00 0.0C 1.00 0.01 1.99 =-Ina- 56L. ��-- 0 C 3635 1155 0 0 0 1600 16 3185 Capac_Arra. Is Module: Vcl/sa-. .._� C.25 C.00 0 0C D.42 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.13 0.21 merit Noves.^>• .,.. Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 200: Dowlinq Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP OY wl Pro] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PM Thu Feb 21, 2002 16:31:13 Page 10-1 Extended Stay America Traffic Impact Analysis Diamond Bar, California -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Opening Year 2004 Conditions Level of Service Computation Report ICU I I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Brea Canyon Rd / Lycoming St Cycle ;sec): 100 Critical Vol./cap. (X): 1.021 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y,R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xy-I-Xxx Optima-' Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: F Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: ------------ L - T - R L - T R L T --------------- 11 --------------- Control 1I --------------- Permitted Permitted Permitted 11 --------------- Permitted Rights: Include include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: ------------I--------------- 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 --------------- Volume Module: --------------- PM --------------- Base Vo'_: 20C 892 129 38 1272 80 78 55 221 114 50 15 Growth Ad;: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 lnitiai Bse: 208 928 134 40 1323 83 81 57 230 119 52 16 Added Vo:: 0 105 0 37 300 0 0 5 0 PasserBvVc! 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 3 10 Initial Fu_�: 0 0 208 1033 134 77 1623 83 81 62 230 169 55 26 User An-: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Ad,: 1.00 1.00 i.00 i.00 11.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P11- Vclutie: 208 1033 134 77 1623 83 81 62 230 169 55 26 Red= Vc. 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduces %'c.' . 206 1022 134 77 1622 83 6- 62 230 169 55 F:= At 11 -OC I.Ce 1.00 1.00 11.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 26 1.00 MLF I.0c i.00 1.00 1.00 1.0c 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 --------- -- 206 1033 134 77 1621 82 81 62 230 --------------- 11 --------------- 169 55 26 Sa:�r�___.. :low --------------- Module: ------ -- 16100 1600 160C 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 16001600 Ad�us.7.e7:-_ 1.00 1.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes I . 0 C 2 . 00 1.00 1. 00 2.00 1.00 0.57 0.43 1.00 0.75 0.25 1.00 Fina- Sat.: ------------ 16CC 320C 1600 1600 3200 1600 906 694 1600 --------------- 1206 394 1600 Ana-ys-js ---------------- --------------- Module --------------- Vol/s.:: 0.13 C.32 0'06 0-05 0'5' 0-05 0.09 0-09 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.02 Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP MITIGS - OY w/ Proj PM Fri Feb 22, 2002 19:43:51 _-_----_-..----------------me___-_--_----__---_-_-__-_-.._--___-e_______--_---____ Page 1-1 Extended Stay America Traffic Impact Analvsis Diamond Bar, California e__________________________________________________________________________ Opening Year 2004 With Project Conditions Level Of Service Computation Report ....A»dI CU !(Loss as Cycle LengthW) Method(FutureVolume. Alternative' Intersection 44 Brea Canyon Rd / Lvccming St Cycle (sec!: 100 Critical Vol./Cao. (X): 0,834 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): XXXXXX op..ma., Cycle: .....a.a....,..«.>..R......< Level ..O..Service: Approach: «........w..s......D..... North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: ------------ L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R i--------------- ------------- L Control: -- 11-____1_111----- Permitted Permitted Permitted --------------- Permitted Rights: include Include Include Include Min. Green: C 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: --------------------------- _. 0 2 0 1 0 2 1 O O 1 0 0 1 1 O 1 O 1 Vo'_ume Modu'1e: I�`-_-'------_---��-------- --_--`��-1111-_-__-- PM _--I Base Vol 20C 892 129 38 1272 80 78 55 221 114 SO 15 Grown'. Ad,: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.D4 lnitia: Bse: 208 928 134 40 1323 83 61 57 230 119 52 16 Added Vel: C 105 0 37 300 0 0 5 0 50 3 PasserByVol- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 Initial Fu�.: 20c :033 134 77 1623 e3 8i 62 230 0 0 169 55 0 26 User Ad;: :.0.^, :.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Ad': :.DC 1.00 _.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Vol•.:me: 20; 1033 134 77 1623 8-, 81 62 230 169 55 26 Rea-c- Vp:: C C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hen-'Ze_ '.__. 20E 1033 134 ,- 1623 83 81 62 230 169 55 26 P2-- Ad- -.D' :,,,_ _.00 1.00 1.00 1.0c 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 M-' Ac- - �- - =- x.00 _.00 _.00 1.00 ..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -----1111-. 77 1623 83 81 62 230 _-...----'------------------- 169 55 26 --------------- -1111----------� -6..; 16CC 160c 16600 160C 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 _.00 _.OG i.00 _.00 ..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes. __.0; OO 1O 2.85 0.15 0.57 0.43 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .-a: Sa_. ---1111- ,.,,,. 320C 1600 1600 456%: 234 906 694 1600 --------------- 1600 1600 1600 Cacac_ .-� -__s �---------- ----- vs - !----------�� -_1111---1111-! _r C._: ..3- 0.06 0.05 00 .36 .36 0.09 0.09 0.14 0.11 0.03 0.02 Cri Cr__ Move=_. : •... .<.. a.<. _.....>..<a.......<................4.�., .a......nrramarwar.xwwwo.ene .... Traffix7.5.'_1'_5 tC: 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RIC ENGINEERING GROUP OY w/ Proj PM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fri Feb 22, 2002 13:29:17 Page 7-1 Extended Stay America Traffic Impact Analysis Diamond Bar, California Opening -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Year 2004 With Project Conditions Level of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 Brea Canyon Rd / West Driveway Average Delay (sec/veh): 12.4 Worst Case Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R ------------ I --------------- L - T R L T R L --------------- conLrol: Uncontrolled --------------- --------------- Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Right _=: include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 2 0 1 ------------ I --------------- 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --------------- Volume Module: PM --------------- --------------- Base Vol: 0 935 0 0 1566 0 0 0 0 0 0 Gro'th Ad3: 1.04 1.04 1.04 0 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 ln-,tial See: 0 972 0 0 1649 0 0 0 0 0 Added Voi: 0 95 65 0 0 3 346 0 0 0 0 PasserRvVol: 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 :ur: 0 1067 65 0 0 0 3 1995 0 0 0 0 0 User Ad,: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHS Ad-: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PH- Vciume: 0 1067 65 3 1995 0 0 0 0 0 Reouct Voj: 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 Fina-- Vo- C 1067 65 3 1995 0 0 0 0 0 Cr ---ca' Ga:: Module- 0 10 Cri-ica! G c ; xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xy---- xxxxx X,,xXx XXXX XXXxx XXXXX _X xxxxx XXXX 2 .2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------- ------ xxxxx xxxx 3.3 C-Pa z Module: xxxX xxxx xxxxx 1132 xxxx xxxxx Xxxx xxxx xy--�' xxxx xy-XXX xxxxx xxxx XXXX 534 624 XXxx xxxxx xxxx XXXX Move �ar X-1= xy� XX-1-Xx ----- -- --- --- ------- xxxxx XXXX XX_Xx 496 624 X-X--zx xxxxx xxxx XXXX XXXX Xxxx Xxxx 496 Leve- Service moduie: 1! 11 --------------- Slozez --e--:x-X-XxX xxxx xxxxx moo. 10.8 Xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx :'0Z Move: xxxx 12.4 Movp�p7l' LT - LTR B LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Share;, -:a�, xy-�-x xxxx xxxx.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx S h r -� E�.z De XXXXX xxxx XXXXX xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx XXXXX XXXX XXXXX >cKxxx Xxxx X)= XXXXX S"are� LCS. Xx.7UC xxxxx Approac:-.Dej: xxxxxx » AncrDac.-.LOS: XXXXXX V-XXXXX 12.4 B Traffrx 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP OY w/ Pro] Pm Fri Feb 22, 2002 13;29;17 -- -- ---- - - - -------------- - -- --- --- --- ---- -------- - Page 8-1 Extended -------------------- Stay America Traffic Impact Analysis Diamond Bar, California -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Opening Year 2004 With Project Conditions Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection 46 Lycoming St / North Driveway Average Delay (se-,/veh): 12.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: S Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound -*-- ..... -- Movement: L - T - R L T R West Bound ------------ L --------------- --------------- Cort rcl; Rights: --------------- Stop Sign--------------- stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: Include Include Include 0 0 Include ------------ 1! 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 i --------------- --------------- Volume Module: --------------- PM --------------- Ease Vo'_: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 222 0 Growth Ad: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 0 79 0 1.04 1.104 Initial, 13se; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.04 Added Vol: 231 0 63 0 2 C 0 186 0 Passe rBvvol: 0 0 0 0 41 0 0 0 3 0 Initial Fut: 0 0 0 0 0 63 0 2 0 a 0 0 User Ad]: 0 0 231 41 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3 186 0 PHF Ad;: i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 63 0 2 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 Reduct Vol: 0 0 231 41 0 0 0 0 3 186 0 Final Vc'.. 0 0 61 0 2 0 0 Cr!�Ical Sap 0 0 231 42 Module: 3 186 0 criticd-- Gc: 6.4 xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx XXXXX XXXX Fol�o,UpTlm. XXXXX 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx ------------ xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx Ca.pa2at,,- --------------- --------------- C %%:l, Pccen- C�1� 444 X-XXx 25- xxxx xxy_,c xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 7 -- 272 xxxx xxxxx Move , - xxx, 791 xxxx XX,,, xxx_Kx xxxx XXXX xxxxx C�L- I'll -,_ -x 792 xx-x,, xxxy 1303 xxxx xxxxx ------------ xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx --------------- --------------- 1303 xxxx xxxxx Leve_ :Sei,.,:cE? --------------- modl,,e --------------- S�cpue:: De-:Y�: xxxxx ,,xx, xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 'CS o, x xxxx xxxxx 7.8 xxxx xxxxx Movemen: snarec Ca L7 R7 L7 - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT A LT - LTR - RT , z. : xxxx 579 xxxxx xxxx xxxy xxxxx xxxx xxxx Shr�- St�.DDe- :x--x-x-x xxxxx 12�0 xxxxx xxx>u, xxxx xxxxx x.XXxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared Los: xxxx xxxxx 8 7.8 xxxx xxxxx ApproachDel. 12.0 xxxxxy. Apirroaci-.Los B xxxx*oc xxxxpcx Traffix 7.5.1115 (C) 2001 Dowling Assoc Licensed to RK ENGINEERING GROUP c CD 'cn c U) w ai U- 0 U'. m a c O E co W Z 52 w ® l LLJLEI Lij �✓ t I i �rTLLJ c CD 'cn c U) w ai U- 0 U'. m a c O E co W Z 52 w ® l '��a3p^n'eaa � �tl Y 0 � L a2 UU s pbOk1 ani xam�s u 3 ff tL�aa '��a3p^n'eaa � �tl Y 0 � L a2 UU s pbOk1 ani xam�s u 3 ff §4W "N UJ Ha §() ■ )\ , EUL }§ \| - e,/�iE \ IS WIN o` - ; b / u Ned-ISi (14) sm a' -B J -M elm B -N an `m APB of 0 9 rD Q) 1N3WdO13A30 VO1871M d.V1S 030N31X3/1.NVdWOO ZNV NV w 0 0 VIN60.JRVO '6V9 GNOAVIG NV]d 111S 11WIA0 bIIN713 ave GNOAY[a INN pill, mim6wmlwdm jd j CK 6, c O ]Nll IIDHVd VINKAI�VO '2JVO GNOVIVICI V31a1VW )NIS (I]CINIIXI 0, o 1 EL INV P 77 0 < Gill, 0 C: o EL 77 0 < 0 C: i4j w M-191 W gm w.jn -9 P12 F -H °Os 00 9DOT9Dm V1WjOJ1]V3 '2JVO GNOVWG SNO777077 VD183AV ,,ViS 03(IN31X3 siilia ll j 111; 1 11, 11M 121 19 1 p g oil all mink HES! Nil 10! 11 R 11 ; no I R Wssaill 49 WHOW 1 A L 10 L ummu POP WIL WN1 WOM ONSO a iNziNijp QffRogy �.e 111mum OWN m1p; ' T '1-6 OHRE. d PHI V r ..1p1p111 NOR, pimph PA 'No NEW ORN gh 1, Id WRT0 Ndld 1N3W3AOddWI LYCOMINO STREET B VINJOJIW3 `JHO ONONVIO N31NJ0 NVO ONONMIO 1� VINKAI�VO '2JVO 4NOWb1a , �I M UOI)JDiXD ,kHVNIINI-l9Hd HONIM "iS 434N31X3 CD) 9069 uv 5 DE VINWJIVO 'WO GNOVIVICI I I:AOUVd - SNOLLVATEI 81]iN30 aV8 ONOMIG I VIN230.�I1VO `�JVO ONM Ia d - SNOliVA313 �J31N30 ade CINowdia • mum Mkm".P* VAMW-mm VINKJIWO 'bVe GNOVqVICI Z 190)JVd - SNOLVAD19 d31N30 dVO ONONVICI u z El i VINKAIWO 'ZN9 GNONVIU C 1301AVc4 — SNOLVA91D J31N30 JV9 ONOMIG yINaOAnda 'ave aNOWvla 53I813WOlOHd a31N30 avO aNOW]a XE Mus aNnOS IIIS VIWJOJI1V3 '�]Ve CINOVIVIO HIA30 6V8 ONONVIG P Q a ry w a cnr a cn 0 W VIWJ0AI-lV0 '2JVB (INOVIVIU Nd -id NV -1 -1v nid:130 NO 0 VDN31N}i� NiS (130NUX3 0 i F- VINdOJI I V 0 'aVG GNOMIC] GNAOTI NVId AcJVOSGNV� aMN30 dV9 UNOHVIG E2 ig C4 J- The 20,140 square foot two-story vacant building is situated on a 40,750 square foot lot, which was previously occupied by a fitness health club. It has a General Plan Land Use designation of Commercial/Office (maximum 1.0 F.A.R.) with a consistent implementing zone of Commercial -Manufacturing. The abutting property to the north, south and west also have a General Plan Land Use designation of Commercial/Office and are zoned CM (Commercial Manufacturing). The properties are developed with an office building and commercial retail shopping center, 1 City of Diamond Bar PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: REPORT DATE: January 22, 2003 MEETING DATE: January 28, 2003 CASE/FILE NUMBER: Conditional Use Permit 02-08 and Variance 02-03 APPLICATION REQUEST: Pursuant to Chapters 22.58 and 22.54 of the City of Diamond Bar Development Code the applicant has requested approval of a Conditional Use Permit to use an existing approximate 20,140 square foot vacant building for a church. Additionally, the proposal request approval of a Variance to permit less than the minimum number of required on-site parking spaces for a church use. PROJECT LOCATION: 23425 Sunset Crossing Road (APN 8706-001-008) PROPERTY OWNERS: Diamond Bar Properties (Nora Ripper) 9454 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 602 Beverly Hills, CA 90212 APPLICANT: Global Mission Church (Daniel Kim) - 3032 Hacienda Boulevard Hacienda Heights, CA 91745 BACKGROUND: The 20,140 square foot two-story vacant building is situated on a 40,750 square foot lot, which was previously occupied by a fitness health club. It has a General Plan Land Use designation of Commercial/Office (maximum 1.0 F.A.R.) with a consistent implementing zone of Commercial -Manufacturing. The abutting property to the north, south and west also have a General Plan Land Use designation of Commercial/Office and are zoned CM (Commercial Manufacturing). The properties are developed with an office building and commercial retail shopping center, 1 respectively. The easterly adjacent property across Sunset Crossing Road has a General Plan Land Use designation of High Density Residential with a consistent R-3 8,000 (High Density Residential) zoning. The property is developed with a residential condominium project. Properties further east have a General Plan Land Use designation of Low -Medium Residential, a consistent implementing R-1 8,000 (Single -Family Residential) zoning, and developed with detached single-family dwellings. ANALYSIS: As previously indicated, the applicant, Global Mission Church, is seeking two (2) discretionary approvals. First, a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) is sought to use the existing 20,140 square foot vacant building for a church., Section 22.10.030 (Table 2-5) of the Diamond Bar Development Code (DBDC) permits a church use in the CM zone, provided a CUP is first approved by the City's Planning Commission. Second, the applicant proposes a deviation (zone variance) from Section 22.30.040.A of the DBDC to allow less than the minimum number of required on-site parking spaces in conjunction with the proposed church facility. The subject site has only 49 on-site parking spaces. Based on the floor plan design and intended ancillary uses of the building, the DBDC requires a minimum of 368 parking spaces. Conditional Use Permit As previously stated, establishment of a church in the City's CM zone is a conditionally permitted use. Conditional uses are those uses, which have a special impact or uniqueness such that their effect on the surrounding environment cannot be determined in advance of the use being proposed for a particular location. At the time of application, a review of the location, design, configuration and impact of the proposed use shall be conducted by comparing such use to fixed and established standards. This review shall determine whether the proposed use should be permitted by weighing the public need for and the benefit to be derived from the use against the impact, which it may cause. Also, conditions are imposed on uses to ensure that any potential negative impacts are adequately addressed and that project proposals remain compatible with the neighboring and surrounding uses so as not to be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare. Given the close proximity of the proposed church to residential neighborhoods, and combined with the limited number of on-site parking spaces for the intended use, staff has concerns about the overall function of the property. The nature of the use has the potential to significantly impact the adjacent streets by increasing the traffic volumes, and creating off-street parking problems. These adverse impacts typically arise when the congregation exceeds the building capacity, and additional events and services (i.e. funerals, weddings, schools, programs, etc.) are conducted on a regular basis. As explained in the applicant's supplemental application documentation, the church has a congregation of 60 families and assumes a growth rate of approximately 15% per 2 annually. Additionally, the major functions consist of two worship services (8:45 a.m. and 11:00 a.m.) to be held on Sunday's, College and Young Adult Group (50 people) on Wednesday's (8:00 p.m. to 9:30 p.m.), Morning Prayer on Saturday's (20 people; 5:30 a.m. to 6:30 a.m.), and Church Office use on Tuesday through Sunday 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. (3 employees). The applicant estimates 150 people will attend the 8:45 a.m. Sunday morning worship service and approximately 120 attendees at the second worship service. To alleviate the inadequacy of on-site parking spaces, the applicant has secured a parking agreement with the northerly adjacent property owner for the non-exclusive use of 140 spaces. The property is developed with an office building containing 184 surface parking spaces. Use of 140 spaces will bring the total number of available spaces for the church to 189, leaving a deficiency of 179 parking spaces. This deficiency is discussed in the following Variance request. It is the applicant's contention that based on the current and projected size of its membership, and the type and frequency of events, 189 spaces are sufficient to adequately accommodate the use. In order to ensure that the proposed use of the site as a church is compatible with the surrounding and neighboring properties, and not cause any potential negative impacts, the applicant has suggested and is accepting of the following conditions of approval. 1. "No use will be made of Applicant's facilities other than uses that are directly related to church activities, specifically worship services, religious schools, and member study and church related meetings. Applicant agrees that it will not operate a nursery school, toddler school, "Mommy and Me" program, parenting program, or child care center at the subject site. 2. The Applicant will not be leased or license use of its facilities, including its parking lot, to any third party. 3. Applicant's members will refrain from street parking at all times. Applicant's members will be instructed in writing to park only on its parking lot and adjoining site pursuant to the Parking Agreement. Applicant will use church members volunteers to direct parking on church parking lot and on the adjacent reciprocal parking spaces in connection with all church services, religious education, and church related meetings, and to prevent any on -street parking. 4. Applicant will deposit a $10,000 cash bond for parking enforcement to be utilized by the City to monitor and implement personnel in the event Applicant does not adequately monitor and direct member parking in connection with church activities to effectively prevent on -street parking. 5. Applicant will certify to the City of Diamond Bar annually, or as often as the City prefers, the total number of Applicant's members and staff. 6. Applicant does not anticipate dramatic or even significant growth in the foreseeable future. Applicant is a Korean Presbyterian church. Nevertheless, Applicant will add a separate and additional worship service to prevent its 189 parking spaces from becoming inadequate for Applicant's use, thereby preventing off-street parking and the risk of any neighborhood disruption. 7. Applicant is willing to accept a 10 -year limit on the Conditional Use Permit and the Variance it seeks if the Planning Commission/City determines such a limitation is necessary. 8. No wedding or funeral will be permitted at the site where the anticipated attendance exceeds 189 vehicles. " It is staff's opinion that the applicant's suggested conditions are sufficient mitigation measures that will provide the necessary assurance to reduce the possible negative impacts from vehicular congestion and ensure public safety, thus making the church compatible with the neighboring and surrounding uses. However, staff does recommend several slight modifications, deletions, and additions to the proposed conditions. In particular, staff suggest that condition "5" be amended to read as follows: o "Applicant will certify to the. City of Diamond Bar Planning Commission annually, the total number of Applicant's members, staff, and services to ensure adherence to all conditions of approval." Staff also recommends that condition "7" be removed in its entirety, and substituted with the following language: o "All events and activities shall take place within the confines of the building." Added conditions are enumerated in the proposed resolution. Minor facade and interior improvements are proposed to enhance the aesthetic appearance of the building and adapt its functions for a church use. Several ceiling skylights will be installed, new base color and accent paints for the exterior building walls, and a new entry door and window (removal of the exterior ramp and stairs). Interior changes consist of dividing the space to accommodate a main sanctuary, office/classrooms, fellowship hall, storage room, and basketball court. The DBDC (Section 22.58.040) requires that a conditional use permit be granted if it can be shown that all of the listed findings of fact are in evidence. All findings must be justified and upheld in the affirmative for approval of the conditional use permit; only one (1) finding requires a negative response to uphold a denial. It is staff's belief that because of the recommended conditions of approval regarding operating procedures, site and building improvements, and on and off-site safety measures all findings can be made in the affirmative, as explained in the attached resolution. Zone Variance The applicant's second request is to permit a reduction in the required on-site parking spaces for a church use. Section 22.30.040 of the DBDC established the minimum -parking ratio for a church as 1 space for each 3 seats or 1 space for every 35 square feet of gross assembly area, classrooms, meeting room, etc. Furthermore, Section 22.30.070.C.2 requires that all parking spaces be located on the same parcel as the uses served, except that parking may be located on an adjacent parcel subject to a recorded covenant running with the land recorded by the owner of the parking lot guaranteeing that the required parking will be maintained for the use or activity served. Based on the submitted floor plan, staff determined that a total of 368 on-site parking spaces must be provided. This was derived by using the parking ratio of 1 space for each 35 square feet of gross assembly area (e.g. sanctuary, seating, basketball court, youth group, Sunday school room, classrooms, and second floor lobby area). Although the DBDC specifies two parking ratios for a church use, Section 22.04.020.F.1 of the DBDC states that the most restrictive requirement shall apply, thereby in this instance mandating the 1 space for each 35 square feet of gross assembly area. The plans show 49 on-site parking spaces with 140 spaces to be provided at the adjacent property (556 Diamond Bar Boulevard) for a total of 189 parking spaces. The use of the adjacent properties parking spaces has been resolved to be in compliance with the provisions of the DBDC allowing the use of off-site parking with an acceptable parking agreement. Nonetheless, the proposed use still has a deficiency of 179 parking spaces. Approval of a variance .is intended to relieve the property owner from any inability to make reasonable use of their property in the same manner that other property of like character in the same vicinity and zone can be used. However, granting of a variance shall not represent a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the same vicinity and zone. Further, it shall not authorize a use or activity, which is not expressly authorized by the zoning regulations governing the parcel of property. The City's Development Code (Chapter 22.54) permits a variance to be granted only if it can be shown that all of the listed findings of fact are in evidence. All findings must be justified and upheld in the affirmative for approval of the variance; only one (1) finding requires a negative response to uphold a denial. The size, type, configuration, number of existing parking spaces and current zoning designation limits the available options for an adaptive re-use/occupancy of the building. For most permitted and conditionally permitted uses in the CM zone, the parking is based on gross floor area. Therefore, based on the buildings sizable square footage in relation to the potential uses (i.e. office, service, medical, etc.) the site does not contain ample parking to meet the minimum number of required on-site parking spaces. It is staff's belief that approval of the variance would not constitute a special privilege. Because of the uniqueness of the property and its improvements, it is unfeasible to provide on-site parking that meets the DBDC requirements. This is atypical, as other CM zoned lots in the immediate vicinity have been designed with adequate on-site parking to meet the Code. Therefore, staff is of the belief that the deviation, in this case, would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare of the community nor would it compromise or conflict with the intent of the ordinance. Also, the intended use of the building is a conditionally permitted use in the CM zone, and with the recommended conditions regulating operating procedures, congregation size and securing added parking spaces would be consistent with the policies established in the General Plan. The resulting deviation from the minimum required number of parking spaces would still . provide for a practical, safe and compatible development. It could be perceived that to disallow the owner utilization of the site in the manner requested constitutes an unreasonable hardship, as there are very few other reasonably permissible uses that would comply with the City's parking requirements. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION: This application was advertised in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on January 10, 2003. Approximately 119 -properly owner's within a 500 -foot radius of the subject property was sent a notice of the public hearing on January 10, 2003. A notice of public hearing display board measuring at least four -foot by six foot was posted at the site, in addition to a notice being posted at three public places for at least ten days prior to the hearing. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Article 6, Section 15070, the City has determined that a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact is required for this project. The Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2002-09 has been prepared and is made part of this administrative record. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission receive staffs report, open the public hearing, continue the public hearing to February 11, 2003 and direct staff to prepare a resolution approving the project. The following conditions are listed for the Planning Commission's consideration for incorporation into the resolution. The Planning Commission may modify or add to the suggested conditions. ♦ To ensure compliance with all conditions of approval and applicable codes, the Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to periodic review. If non-compliance with conditions of approval occurs, the Planning Commission may review the Conditional Use Permit and modify or revoke the Conditional Use Permit. The applicant shall be required to submit to the Planning Division for review and approval a detailed landscape/irrigation plan for the re -landscaping of the existing planters in and around the property. The plan shall provide for a variety of grasses and ground cover, flowering plants, and shrubs and trees. All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. e All signs require a separate review, fee and approval, Which shall be in compliance with the provisions of the City's Sign Ordinance (Chapter 22.36). ® The applicant/property owner shall reconstruct (i.e., repave and restripe in accordance with City standards) the parking lot and the property owner's portion of the alley prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. e The applicant shall provide alighting study for the parking lot. All existing parking lot lighting shall be kept in good operating condition and positioned/shielded so as to prevent the spillage of light onto adjacent neighboring properties. All events and activities shall take place within the confines of the building. ♦ Applicant shall not utilize the building for activities that are not directly related to church activities, specifically worship services, religious schools, member study and church related meetings. Applicant shall not operate a nursery school, toddler school, "Mommy and Me" program, parenting program, or childcare center at the subject site. ♦ Applicant shall not lease or license the use of its facilities, including its parking lot, to any third party. ♦ Church members shall refrain from street parking at all times. Church shall instruct its members, in writing, to park only on its parking lot and adjoining site pursuant to the Parking Agreement. Applicant shall utilize church member volunteers to direct parking on church parking lot and on the adjacent reciprocal parking spaces in connection with all church services, religious education, and church related meetings in order to prevent any on -street parking. o Applicant shall deposit a $10,000 cash bond for parking enforcement to be utilized by the City to monitor and implement personnel in the event the Applicant does not adequately monitor and direct member parking in connection with church activities to effectively prevent on -street parking. Applicant shall enter into a parking agreement with the adjacent property owner (556 Diamond Bar Boulevard) for the use of 140 parking spaces. The parking agreement shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to recordation. The agreement shall remain in effect so long as the church is in operation. e Applicant shall add a separate and additional worship service to prevent its 189 parking spaces from becoming inadequate for Applicant's use, thereby preventing off-street parking and the risk of any neighborhood disruption. o No wedding or funeral shall not be permitted at the site where the anticipated attendance exceeds 189 vehicles. ® All construction activity shall be in conformity with the requirements and limitations of the. City of Diamond Bar Municipal Code as implemented by the Building and Safety Division. REQUIRED CONDITIONAL USE PEMIT FINDINGS (SECTION 22.58.040): * 1. The proposed use is allowed within the subject zoning district with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Development Code and the Municipal Code; 2. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan; 3. The design, location, size and operating characteristics of the proposed use are compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity; 4. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of use being proposed including access, provisions of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and the absence of physical constraints; 5. Granting the Conditional Use Permit will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property or improvements in the vicinity and zoning districts in which the property is located, and; 6. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). REQUIRED VARIANCE FINDINGS (SECTION 22.54.040.A. & B.): 1. There are special circumstances applicable to the property (e.g., location, shape, size, surroundings, topography, or other conditions), so that the strict application of this Development Code denies the property owner privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zoning districts or creates an unnecessary and non -self created, hardship or unreasonable regulation which make it obviously impractical to require compliance with the development standards; 2. Granting the Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other property owners in the same vicinity and zoning district and denied to the property owner for which the Variance is sought; 3. Granting the Variance is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan; 4. The proposed entitlement would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City; and 5. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Section 22.54.040.13 (Findings for off-street parking reductions) 6. The intent of the parking regulations, which is to ensure that sufficient parking will be provided to serve the use intended and potential future uses of the subject site, is preserved; and 7. A Parking Permit is approved in compliance with Section 22.030.050 (Reduction of Off - Street Parking Requirements for Shared Uses). Prepared by: LDM Associates Incorporated Planning Consultant ATTACHMENTS: 1. Initial Study/Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact 2. Applications and Supplemental Documentation; 3. Reciprocal Licensing Agreement for Parking; 4. Traffic Impact Analysis Report (Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers (July 3, 2002) 5. Site Plan, Floor Plan and Elevation Drawings (Exhibit "A", dated January 28, 2003). 9 :: • ;r: cue N l' CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DEPARTMEn OF .: Deposit s q == L�' COMMTINITY &DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Receipt r—'-' ---- "'"�','"� `_ Planning Division E v . ,x; g;:. ;.. 21660 E_ C S aplry Drivc Strite 190, Diamond Ba, CA 92765 Dat. Reed - ri - (909)396-5676 Fax (909)86I-3117ron tm t3E - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION Ramrd owns Agpiier$f Appl—f5 Agent NamectY -.. (1 astnmme Sat 1 . �,/ aamefirst) __ Addrrst�I � �4-• �� MiStuo11 C'.teuir.(� .. Vt'GK� Q i kc City 3D32 �iG1Ci��a zip Phone( ) 310. 2'f8.$oo —r- - phcnd ) 3 35 7• 88 Fay ( ) 310. 27I•�i�2�1 Fax Y6 o7G8.. p NOTE: Itis the applicants responsibt7iry to notify the City in writing of any change o processing of this case. f'the principalsprincipalsinvolved daring the t (Attach sepazatr. sheet, ifn eeessa y, including ttanrq Bddress and signatures ofm=be=s of paxtnaships Joni vea corporations.) w-, and dixct. of Consent 1 Certify that I am the owner of the herein drsrn3��e jd property and permit the appLCant to frle this regnei2 Siffied_s�:e G rr�e f%V`+ iI1Ks1r (All record own=)Cert i o� .Date hestYofmy n: I, the undersigrre4 hereby rerhjy underp—I y ofperjuryShatthe informafion herein provided!ii 4o X47 the' bort of my knowledge. Print Name (Appi tAgenfl I Signed Date cant or Agent) �3�'�i �l.tvt�l- C3-a55i1��1 KCS .UiCiL�not1C1 �DCbY'- r-�-T'S- �i'7� _ (Strxt addr=s or tra and lot number) Zoning Hoose Numbering Map Previous Cases Present Use ofSite _ UGIC�ivt� braV'otts'Y Use applied for City of Diamond Bar + %� CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT— _ I?O 140 Project Size (grit act=s) ft Gicr G Pruicci Densis}' 3 a ` !:S 5a¢ Prcvions Cases Present use of site .yG�cGl for �4t9V c*As�y �eaLiit t"�tit �Ss� ' Domestic NVater Souse _ 1 1: G Camw iiaaymistriet Method of5`ewageDisposal ` 1.Q` �GW SanitationDisttiot_yti i Grading of Lots by Applicant? YES NO Amount (Show necessary grading design on ataplan or tent_ map) �t i '" `• _..OTIIONAL USE PEFtMTT BURDEN OF . _ JF ;'.::c . hi addition to theinformation required in the application, the applicant sbau substantiate to the suid'action of the Planning Commisrion the following farts: (answers must be full & complete) ' A That the requested use at the location proposed will not: 1. Adversely affect the health, Peace, comfort or welfare of persons residing or workine in the surrounding area, or 2. Be materially detrimental to the use, en o 7 smear or valuation of property of other persons located in the __ .. vicinity of the site, or ;;r_ - =- 3. . _ .. Jeopardize, endanger or otherwise constitute s menace to the public health, safety or general welfare. ��.���,.. ;.;.� _:.,� � rel,, b•e �•, �"�� �Tot7 —(a '�ts �� ���� LL . r Gl �� W �1 �t]� DPPN qvt and�tYYC �✓IGit'tGl n �.. �V6kcawc u a B. Hltat the proposed site is adequate iu'size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences= parking and loading factlilies, IandsoaPing and other development features prescribed is this Title 22, or as is otherwise required in order to integrate said use with the uses in he smzouading area C*) -S, V• -i W ( S �`q C. That the proposed rile is adequatciy served: OIQt t? e, By highways or stracts of sufficient width and improved as necessary to carry the kind and quantity of traffic such use would generate, and - ^ 2. By other public or private service facilities as are required T p—� _� t -(- s�,•e,�� sil'-� i s �Sa�.t.1 -�30� - .e ,��1 � b.ctwe.•itnci �.[" , ,Residential: Total Units Bachelor 3 Hedraom 2 Bdrm_ &larger Total Pk8• Cov. Pkg- Uncov. Pkg. Project Size: Lot Coverage: Density: Maximum Height: —�No. of floors: Sq. Footage Non-residential: 2-0,14o 7� Sq. fl. arca No. of Bldgs. Occupant Load" CUP Burden of Proof • Page I Parkiag:�4o cgs) ':Total *__ _' Standard .. Compact' Handicap Landscaping: . S Sq- feet Grading: Y — N ✓ Ifya Quantity.- Cut uanteCut Y?K Fill: - -" r Import -YIfya, .Qoantiry . y ' :ort Y iN J✓=' _.If. _ n . �..w x'�'�' UzZ, miipani Load as calculated the Bui -Z - ; ' s b}' ldurg 3ajery Division is rrqurred for all dining, tal -oul crasaembly sire churches, sr' . :health clubs, theaters, etc. ' LEGAL DESCRIP77ON (all ownership comprising the proposed lot(s))parcel(s) Area devoted to structures ' (ti , G'l 7 3r Lea'dscapiag�p ypacec Residendal Project: and' -:: (gross,arsa) (No. of lots) • Proposed density (Units/Acres) Parking Required Provided Standard Compact p' Handicapped Total g gimp Conditional Use Permit Burden of Proof - Page 2 Project Applicant (Owner): .:NAME DDRESS .7 PHONE# FAX# Staff Use Project No. MTIAL STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE (to be completed by applicant) A GENERAL WORMATION Project Acpresentative: .�o Co NAME 1(3, 307. `7788 VI, 38-T. 4,7C7 PHONE# FAX# L Action requested and project description: LIS use wk, 2. Street location of project 3. Present use of site: 4. Previous use of site Or structures: 14, d 5. Project Description a- Site Size (total area) b. Square Footage (covered by strucm,,,, paving C. Number of floors of construction d. Amount Of Off-str=t Parking provided C. Landscaping. Open space Propose scbeduling 9- Associated projects h. Anticipated incremental development 13D Inki-I Study Qu=ti..i. - p.g. 1 i If residential, incl- r member of units, schedule of amt saes ran"�-� e1e aces or renes and • sae expected) P type ofhoeisehold�:°=t:.'. j- If commercial, indicate the type, wbetherneighborhood, ci orre onaily orient loading facilities. —1 ry s4u footage ofsalcs area and :i k If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities 1 If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employmenten and commune benefits to be derived from the project Per estimated occupancy. loading facilities, m. If the project involves a application is required. variancc, conditional usevr razaning application, state this and ind ,cate cl , why use — tai s t acew"'fi' -{a res';�r-�', a.� �t►�c� 6. Please list all previous cases (if any) iated to this project: 1�1�te 7. List related permitlapprovals required. Specify type and graatin en B agency. ' IV) CXicr Y�lMo tNGl 8. Are you planning future phases of Ibis project? Y N Ifyes, explain: 9. ?=sent zoning: ClV1 10. Water, and sewer service: Domestic Public Water Sewers Does service exist at site? Y tf N _ Y2/' N_ If yes, do purveyors have capacity to meet demand of project and all other approved projects? Y ✓ Ni Y N_ Initial Study Queairnaeia. Page 2 If yes, explain Initial Study Queaio .fun - Page 3 �domestio water or publi, are not available, how will these services b, ied? — Residential Projects: _._i .:... .._..a. — Number and type of units: _ b. -- floor area of each unit: - -- e. --- Number of floors Dols What school district(s) serves the property' Are existing school faculties adequate to meet project needs? YES NO— O_If Ifnot wha! provisions will be made for additional classrooms? -:.Non-residential projects: (commercial, industrial, iostitutional) .'A. Distance to-nearest residential use or sensitive use (school, hospital, etc.) GCYMS ' 4VI Grp' Y12' {� . b. Number and floor arca'of buildings: 2 Number of employees and shifts: 3 81tit 6?eC5, , d- -7- ......Maximum employees persbift: .e- Operating hours: f. ... Community benefit to be derived fromproject _"_ clluyz�n ta:4 "t 2 �� 'totl: 'c3�n�ytiu4i t rs A a'Uh Ps w vav'.'L's rV' .cw ar-D VgkACIA ps 4w 61'Ecotr 9CYLk,r><t-S7 g- yap Identify any: End products G ' �t(td1 waste products�Cx.lS��l d �tbts�Cj� , --t�U'1+navttC Means of disposal y i5 �Jo5b1 i �+r lJic� h. Do project operations usc,:siore or produce hazardous substances such as oil, pesticides, chemicals, paints, or ' radioactive materials? ' YES NO ✓ If yes, explain Initial Study Queaio .fun - Page 3 15. If residential, include the number of units;'scbedule of unit sizes 16. If commercial, indicate the type, wbetber neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, of sales area and loading facilities.Squarefootage ' 17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities N 18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shitl estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the.projecL fr. �'�• �a�te � .�Oc`CI i4j °I �'lGi' fi85 W �I �.to� � ��Ge55R �n9 Y1A�ltn r Y � C 'ndat Slndy QUC2I mairc-Pagc4 .. .. .... .. i_ =: Do your operations require any pressurized taalts7 YES —NO _.: Ifyes,pxplain Iden as fl--- le, ' �y y ctivo or explosive materials' be located on-site. i . Will delivcry,or shipment: trucks travel through residential arras to " reach the nearest highway?•_ Zi-£; NO If yes,4=piain 15. If residential, include the number of units;'scbedule of unit sizes 16. If commercial, indicate the type, wbetber neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, of sales area and loading facilities.Squarefootage ' 17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities N 18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shitl estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the.projecL fr. �'�• �a�te � .�Oc`CI i4j °I �'lGi' fi85 W �I �.to� � ��Ge55R �n9 Y1A�ltn r Y � C 'ndat Slndy QUC2I mairc-Pagc4 FROM :Grace Partnership Inc. FAX N0. '2133e74567 S 20 2002 04:10PM P1 CITY OF DiAMUNIJ BxA �Gnan b +CC.MMMUNITY AND FPL�— DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Deposit Plannlna Diviclon Rcceipt # – 21925 F. Copley Drive y), Bar, CA 91765 e Read _ _ itDatDiamond Phone (909) 396.5676 Fax (909) 941.3117 FOP CITY VAR iVARIANCE APPLICATION D MINOR VARIANCE APP];ACATICN Record Owner Applicant. Applicant's Agent vtame Last (I est name first) (Last Hemp rst) (Last name first) dn CLurci►Yaeu..�. 0.ddrems {{ + 1 City t�rZ�— ZipoZt© ate cia C X17 �J.�s 1��'� C Phone ( ) i C3 Phoae C9' Mo phone ( ) W3 IS �IZ 43 Fax ( ) 3t rJ- :Y( Fax � � Fax NoU pa NOTE: it is the applican 's rospanslbility to notify the city in writing of any change of the principals involved during the processing of this ease, (Attach separate sheat, if necessary, including names, addresses, and signatures of members of partnerships, jainr ventures, and directors of corporations.) Consent; i cer'tf f,V that one the owner Pf fhe herein dasorihed property and permit file Applicant A0 JU' �thtc mguest, n �V��" '_t_ "• Signalqoc�l VEdt-�5' L K��Lu� �% Certttictrtion: 1, rhe undersigned, hareby cert( j+ under penahy of perjury that the information herein provided is correct to the bait Of my knowiedgv Prim Name (Appii t r gent) Slprted Date Applica or Agent) 7 Location z342 -t; C s�sr `_Grcae�tytd (Street add s or fro t and lot tA� ,,-- between- _ AiAu.,-+tn.r! &Vd and K)PIVE6) (Stragt ( CUt) Zoning Cts. House Numbering Map FROM :Grace Partnership Inc. FAX No. :2133874567 20 2002 04:11PM P3 erl larking: oull Standard Handicap 'ITY OF DIAMOND BAR VARIANCE APPLICATION MNMUED... Landmnpiag: 65 ( sq. feet kiding; Y'SS 0 NO import: YES fj NO )r export: YES 0 NO Planner Previous Cow If ym, Qumtity: Cut; Fill; If yet, Quantity: If Yoe, Quantity: FROM :Grace Partnership Inc. FAX NO. :2133874567 SeF R 2002 04:11PM P2 VARIANCE/MINOR VARIANCE BURDEN OF PROOF In addition to the information required in the application, the applicant sball suhrtantiate to the satisfartion of the Planning Divivon/Planning Commission the following facts; (Answers mtur be derailed and complete. Attach ar/dirional sheets of paper ( necessary.) Therc arc special circumstance& applicable to the propatry (e.g., location, shape, size, surroundings, topography, or other conditions,) so that the strict application of the Development Code denim ncc property owner privileges enjoyed py other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zoning districts or creates an unnecessary and non -self created, hardsttlp or unreasonable regulation which make it obviously intprac:ical to require Compliance with the development standards; The parking requirement under current development codes prevents the subject building from being viably utilized. The requirement of 360 parking spaces is unreaso0ably and unnecessarily high for applicant for the church's present 120 membership, and for the future growth of optimistic 10% growth per annum. Granting the Variance/Minor Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights pmscssed by other property owners in the same vicinity and zoning district and daniod to the property owner for which the VarlaneciMiaor Variance is sought; Due to the inherent lack of adequate on-site parking capacity, the subject property will be severely under-utilized (e.g. 3 -year vacancy until present), unless Variance is granted for any viable use. 3. Cirandrsp the Variance/Minor Variance is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan; and any Specific plan; and No parameters of this development are inconsistent with the General Plan or any other relevant plans. 4. lite proposed entitlement would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, cortvenlonoo, or welfare of the City; and The church has a "reciprocal parking agreement" for the use of 140 parking spaces at the adjacent property, 556 Diamond Bar Blvd. The total of 189 parking spaces will sufficient for any foreseeable growth, at least for the next 10 years. The traffic impact analysis also supports that there will be no significant impact by the church in the future. 5. The proposed enthIctneat hae been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEaA), 11/21/2002 08.23 81891651864 NFJVAK BASES GRSTFLD: PAGE 07 GLOBAL MISSION CHURCH 3032 Hacienda Boulevard , Hacienda Heights, California 91745 (626) 968-1400 phone (626; 968-5890 Fax B Y,RECEIVE_ DEC 0 3 2002 November 25, 2002 ­ City of Diamond Bar Dept. Community &Development Services C/o L.D.M. Associates, Inc. 10722 Arrow Route Suite 822 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: Mr. Mylan Garrison, Planning Consultant Re: Variance Application Global Mission church 23425 Sunset crossing Road, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Dear Mr. Garrison: This letter will constitute the Supplement and Amendment to Global Mission Church,s above -captioned Application for Variance. At paragraph 1, the language: "The subject property lacks adequate parking area for any viable use of the existing building." should be amended to read: "Present zoning for the subject property is unnecessarily and unrealistically excessive for hPP!icani, preventing its reasonable use of the e%isting building for a church. Applicant has 60 member families and lag parking spaces ava " :!able during Sundays and week nights. The additional 140 parking Spaces available Pursuant to the Reciprocal Licensing Agreement for Parking ("Parking Agreement" herein) heretofore submitted, are at an adjacent office building which has 184 parking spaces. The 140 spaces available on a non-exclusive basis to Applicant reasonably and realistically will be available to Applicant in that said office building is hardly utilized on Sundays and week nights, 11/27/2002 08:23 81890518F4 NOVAK BASES GRSTFLD:PAGE 08 Mr. Mylan Garrison November 25, 2002 Page 2 thus freeing up the 140 spaces to be available to Applicant's members in the event they need more than ,Applicant's 49 on-site parking spaces. The owner of the adjacent building has reserved an addition 44 spaces for its tenants' use on Sundays and week nights.,, In respect to paragraph 2 of said Variance Application, Applicant hereby airoends the following language: "Again, the subject property lacks adequate Parking for any viable use of the existing building." , and substitutes therefore the following: "Applicant has 60 member families and 189 parking spaces available during Sundays and week nights when Applicant has services and religious education classes, respectively. The additional 140 parking spaces available pursuant to the Reciprocal Licensing Agreement for Parking ("Parking Agreement" herein) heretofore submitted, are at an adjacent office building which has 184 parking spaces. The 140 spaces available on a non-exclusive basis to Applicant reasonably and realistically will be available to Applicant in that said office building is hardly utilized on Sundays and week nights, thus freeing up the 140 spaces to be available to Applicant's members in the event they need more than Applicant's 49 on -sate parking spaces." Applicant supple,nents its response to paragraph 4 of the Variance Application, as follows: "A church utilizing the subject site will eliminate the risk to the neighborhood of an alternative use at the subject site, such as a health club, for which it was initially designed and which previously adversely impacted the surrounding area. such an alternative use, in all likelihood, during usual business hours, would again present a facility with only.45 parking spaces during its weekday and weekend hours of utilization in contrast to: (1) this Applicant's particular needs on Sundays and Wednesday illlli?U0.4 Ub.L,j bib9bblbo4 NOVAK BASES GRSTrLD: PAGE 09 Mr. Mylan Garrison November 25, 2002 Page 3 nights only, and (2) this Applicant's rights under its Parking Agreement that provides for an additional 140 on Sundays and week nights.,, Applicant's anticipated use of the facility is as follows: "1. MAJOR F CIIONS AHD sMMDMS "a. Sunday Worship services and 8:45 a.m. Sunday Sunday School (30 pecpl:/20 vehicles total projected) b. Sunday Worship Services and . L•00 a.m. Sunday Sunday 3chool(120 people/6D- 75 vehicles total projected) "C. College a Young Adult Group e:00 p.m. -9:30 P.M. Wednesday (50 people} "d. Morning Prayer Meeting (20 5:30 a.m.-6;30 a.m- Saturday people/20 vehiclesi "e. church office (max. 3 employees 4:00 a.m.- 6:00 p.m. .Tuesday thru per shift) SatIIrday `As for funerals, Applicant's coemunity does not have them at church, they are at funeral parlors and cemetery halls. As for wedding0, Applicant ha3 had two in 2002, both conducted at other churches. Applicant anticipates there will be no weddings at the subject facility because 0£ its configuration. As a former health club, gymnasium, it will suffice for the above described church activities, but it is net artici-paced any weddings will occur there. Applicant will accept a condition that no weddings will be permitted where the expected attendsnct exceeds 104 vehicle. Applicant further supplements its Application for a Variance, as follo.Is: "Applicant recognizes that the City of Diamond Bar is concerned that Applicant has adequate onsite/off-street parking available for its use; and, ;secondly, that Applicant does not use or allow a third party to use its facilities for non -church or commercial Purposes which use or uses might threaten to disrupt the neighborhood. "Applicant has a membership of 60 families and access to 189 off-street parking spaces during Sunday church services, religious school, and during any week night religious Classes presently conducted on Wednesday nights. "Accordingly, Applicant hereby makes the following promises and offers the following 1ir27l20�i� 6ti:23 8i890518ha NOVAK BASES GRSTFLD: PAGE 10 Mr. Mylan Garrison November 25, 2002 Page 4 agreements to the City of Diamond Bar, all of which Applicant will accept as conditions to the City's determination in respect to a Conditional Use Permit and/or Variance: "1. No use will be made of Applicant's facilities other than uses that are directly related to church activities, specifically worship services, religious schools, and member study and'church related meetings. Applicant will agree that it will not operate a nursery school, toddler school, "Mommy and me'' program, parenting program, or child care center at the subject site. "2- Applicant will not lease or license use Of its facilities, including its parking lot, to any third party. "�• Applicant's members will refrain from street parking at all times. Applicant's members will be instructed in writing to park only on its parking lot and the adjoining site pursuant to the Parking Agreement. Applicant will use church member volunteers to direct parking on the church parking lot and on the adjacent reciprocal parking spaces in connection with all church services, religious education, and church related meetings, and to prevent any on -street Parking. ,.4. Applicant will deposit a $10,000 cash bond for parking enforcement to be utilized by the City to hire traffic officers in the event Applicant does not adequately monitor and direct member parking in connection with church activities to effectively prevent on - street parking. It 5. Applicant will Diamond Har annuallycertify to the City of , or as often as the City prefers, the total number.of Applicant's members and staff. 6• Applicant does not anticipate dramatic or even, significant growth in the foreseeable future. Applicant is a Korean Presbyterian church, Nevertheless, Applicant will add a separate and additional worship service to NuvkN ZHZ3=11� t]KJIrL.U; riAur_ IL Mr. Mylan Garrison November 25, 2002 Page 5 Prevent its 189 parking spaces from becoming inadequate for Applicant's use, thereby preventing off-street parking and the risk of any neighborhood disruption. If L two worship services become insufficient ito handle the congregation and its on-site parking requirements (this would represent approximately 60oos growth, from 60 families to approximately 360 families), a third service will be added. "7. Applicant will agree to seek an alternative church site, despite a three - service schedule, if it threatens to exceed its on-site parking requirements. "8. No wedding or funeral will be permitted at the site where the anticipated attendance exceeds 189 vehicles.,, If you have any questions concerning this Supplement and Amendment, please contact our attorney, Mark S. Novak, Esq., at (818) 905-1144, fax number; Ventura Blvd., (818) -905-1864, address: 16633 Suite 1200, Encino, CA 91436-1639, and Our agent, Leo Cho, whose address and phone number are set forth on Applicant's original Application. Thank you very much for your this Application. this and attention to .L Respectfully submitted, GLOBAL MISSION CF-jRCH By: Daniel Kim, pastor 11/26/2002 17:14 6189051E NOVAK BASES GRP --LD: PAGE 07 GLOBAL MISSION CHURCH 3032 Hacienda Boulevard Hacienda Heights, California 91745 (626) 968-1400 Phone (626) 968-5890 Fax November 25, 2002 DEC 0 3 2002 1 City of Diamond Bar Dept. Community & Development Services c/o L.D.M. Associates, Inc. 10722 Arrow Route Suite 822 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: Mr- Mylan Garrison, Planning Consultant Re: Conditional Use Permit No. 02-08 Global Mission Church 23425 Sunset Crossing Road, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Dear Mr. Garrison: This letter will constitute the Supplement and Amendment to Global Mission Church's above -captioned Application for a Conditional Use Permit. in addition to the information set forth in response to Conditional Use Permit Burden of Proof, paragraph A, subparagraphs 1, 2 and 3, Applicant represents that it has 60 member families and 189 parking spaces available during Sundays and week nights when Applicant has services and religious education classes, respectively. The additional 140 parking spaces available pursuant to the Reciprocal Licensing Agreement for Parking ("Parking Agreement" herein) heretofore submitted, are at an adjacent office building which has 184 parking spaces. The 140 spaces available on a non-exclusive basis to Applicant reasonably and realistically will be available to Applicant in that said office building is hardly utilized on Sundays and week nights, thus freeing up the 140 spaces to be available to Applicant's members in the event they need more than Applicant's 49 on-site parking spaces. The owner of the adjacent building has reserved an additional 44 spaces for its tenants, use on Sundays and week nights. Applicant hereby supplements its response to the Initial Study Questionnaire, paragraph 5.m., as follows: 11/26/2002 17:14 8189051E, . NOVAK BASES GRSTI-I-D: PAGE 08 Mr. Mylan Garrison November 25, 2002 Page 2 "Per the square footage of Applicant's facility, 368 off-street parking spaces would be required. This required amount of parking spaces is unnecessarily and unreasonably high for Applicant in that Applicant has go family members of its church. The 49 on-site spaces and the 14D additional spaces available to Applicant pursuant to the Parking Agreement will be more than adequate for Applicant for the foreseeable future. "Assuming a growth of 159, per annum, after eight years, Applicant would have 184 family members. Even with 100k attendance at worship services on Sunday morning and Wednesday night religious study, the presently available parking would be adequate. "Additionally, Applicant will commit to adding an additional worship service for its membership in the event 189 spaces becomes inadequate to handle attendance." Applicant hereby supplements its response to question 7 of the Initial Study Questionnaire, as follows! "Variance - Planning commission." Applicant hereby supplements its response to Paragraph 12.f. of the Initial Study Questionnaire, as follows; "A church utilizing the subject site will eliminate the risk to the neighborhood of an alternative use at the subject site, such as a health club, for which it was initially designed and which Previously adversely impacted the surrounding area. Such an alternative use, in all likelihood, during usual business hours, would again present a facility with only 49 parking spaces during its weekday and weekend hours Of utilization in contrast to: (1) this Applicant's Particular needs on Sundays and Wednesday nights only, and (2) this Applicant's rights under its Parking Agreement that provides for an additional 140 on Sundays and week nights." Applicant hereby . amends its Attachment to its Conditional 11/26/2002 17:14 818905jr ' NOVAK BASES GRP-7LD: PAGE 09 Mx. Mylan Garrison November 25, 2002 Page 3 Use Permit Application, as follows: ATTACMM= "l. MM—OR r MOONS AND 9Cl03'DRLR Sunday Worship Servicesand 0:45 a.m. Sunday Sunday School (30 people /2t vehicles total projected) "b. Sunday Worship Services and 11:00 a.m. Sunday Sunday School 1120 people/60- 75 vehicles total projected) "c. College & Young Adult areup 0:00 p.m. -8.-30 p,m_ Wednesday (50 people) "d. Morning Prayer Meeting (20 5.30 A.m."6:30 a.m. Saturday people/20 vehicles) - "e. Church office (max, 3 employees 9:00 a.m.- 8:00 p.m, Tuesday thru per shift) Saturday "As for funerals, Applicant's community does not have them at church, they are at funeral parlors and cemetery halls. As for weddings, Applicant has had two in 2002, both conducted at other churches. Applicant anticipates there will he no weddings at the subject facility because of its configuration. An a former health club, gymnasium, it will suffice for the above described church activities, but it is not anticipated any weddings will occur there. Applicant will accept a condition that no weddings will be permitted where the expected attendance exceeds 164 vehicles. "2. ESTIMATED OCCOPANCY '150 persons, 30 at 8:45 a.m. Sunday worship Services and Sunday School, 120 at 11;00 Sunday worship Services." a.m'. Applicant further supplements its Application for a Conditional Use Permit as follows: Applicant recognizes that the City of Diamond Bar is concerned that Applicant has adequate onsite/off-street parking available for its use; and, secondly, that Applicant does not use or allow a third party to use its facilities for non -church or commercial purposes which use or uses might threaten to disrupt the neighborhood. "Applicant has a membership of 60 families and access to 189 off-street parking spaces during Sunday morning church services, religious school, and during any week night religious classes presently conducted on. Wednesday nights. 11/26/2002 17:14 8189051r-1 NOVAK BASES GRS"rLD: PAGE 10 Mr. Mylan Garrison November 25, 2002 Page 4 "Accordingly, Applicant hereby makek the following promises and offers the following agreements to the City of Diamond Bar, all of which Applicant will accept as conditions to the city's determination in respect to a Conditional Use Permit and/or variance! "I. No use will be made of Applicant's facilities other than uses that are directly related to church activities, specifically worship services, religious schools, and member study and church related meetings. Applicant will agree that it will not operate a nursery school, toddler school, "Mommy and me" program, parenting program, or child care center at the subject site. 112. Applicant will not lease or license use of its facilities, including its parking lot, to any third party. '3. Applicant's members will refrain from street parking at all times. Applicant's members Will be instructed in writing to park only on its parking lot and the adjoining site pursuant to the Parking Agreement. Applicant will use church member volunteers to direct parking on the church parking lot and on the adjacent reciprocal parking spaces in connection with all church services, religious education, and church related meetings, and to Prevent any on -street parking. 11 4� Applicant will deposit a $10,000 cash bond for parking enforcement to be utilized by the City to hire traffic officers in the event Applicant does not adequately monitor and direct member parking in connection with church activities to effectively prevent on - street parking. 115. Applicant will certify to the city of Diamond Bar annually, or as often as the city prefers, the total number of Applicant's members and staff. "6. Applicant does not anticipate dramatic or even significant growth in the foreseeable future. Applicant is a Korean Presbyterian 11/26/2002 17:14 8189051''4 NOVAK BASES GRSTFLD: PAGE 11 Mr. Mylan Garrison November 25, 2002 Page 5 church. Nevertheless, Applicant will add a separate and additional worship service to prevent its 189 parking spaces from becoming inadequate for Applicant's use, thereby preventing off-street parking and the risk of any neighborhood disruption. If two worship services become insufficient to handle the congregation and its on-site parking requirements (this would represent approximately 600* growth, from Go families to approximately 360 families), a third service will be added. "7. Applicant will agree to seek an alternative church site, despite a three - service schedule, it threatens to exceed its on-site parking requirements. 41 8. No wedding or funeral will be permitted at the site where the anticipated attendance exceeds 189 vehicles." If you have -any questions concerning this Supplement and Amendment, please contact our attorney, Mark S. Novak, Esq., at. (818) 905-1144, fax number: (818) 905-1864, address: 16633 Ventura Blvd., Suite 1200, Encino, CA. 91436-1839, and our agent, Leo Cho, whose address and phone number are set forth on Applicant's original Application. Thank you very much for your courtesies and attention to this Application. Respectfully submitted, GLOBAL MISSION CHURCH By: Daniel Kim, Pastor RECIPROCAL LICENSING AGREEMENT FOR PARKING This Agreement dated May 9, 2002 (for reference purposes only), is entered into by GLOBAL MISSION CHURCH, a California non-profit corporation ("GLOBAL" herein), and by EASTGATE 97 SP LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company ("EASTGATE" herein), in light of the following facts: A. GLOBAL is in escrow to purchase real property at 23425 Sunset Crossing Road, Diamond Bar, California, which property is adjacent to EASTGATE's property at 556 Diamond Bar Blvd., Diamond Bar, California. B. The legal description of the real property which GLOBAL is presently in escrow to buy is attached hereto labeled Exhibit A, and incorporated herein by this reference ("GLOBAL's Property" herein), C. The legal description of EASTGATE's said real property is: That certain real property, in City of Diamond Bar, County of Los Angeles, California, legally described as Lots 8 and 9 of Tract 28853, per maps in Book 772, Pages 12 and 13 of Maps, Official Records of said County and State, and commonly known as 556 Diamond Bar Blvd., Diamond Baz, California ("EASTGATE's Property" herein). D. Each of the parties hereto desires to have the right to park in the other party's parking area during specific times of the week which the parties hereto represent will not interfere with the respective owner's (or their tenants') use of their respective parking areas. E. GLOBAL's parking areas on GLOBAL's Property are portrayed on Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference ("GLOBAL's Parking Area" herein). EASTGATE's parking areas on EASTGATE's Property are portrayed on Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein -by this reference ("EASTGATE's Parking Area" herein). A parking plan pursuant to an ALTA survey may be substituted fin Exhibit C. WHEREFORE, the parties hereto, in consideration of the mutual promises and agreements set forth below, hereby agree as follows: GLOBAL hereby grants to EASTGATE, and its tenants and invitees, a non- exclusive license to use GLOBAL's Parking Area consisting of 49 spaces on all weekdays and Saturdays (except when Christmas occurs on a weekday or a Saturday) throughout the year for a period of twenty (20) years between the hours of 6:00 a.m. and 6:30 p.m. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the above license shall not apply to those five spaces which are shaded on Exhibit B hereto, which five spaces shall be reserved for the clergy and professional staff of GLOBAL at all times. Subject to the limitations hereinafter set forth, in this subparagraph 2, EASTGATE hereby grants to GLOBAL, and its staff, members and guests, a non-exclusive license to use EASTGATE's Parking Area, consisting of approximately 140 spaces, on Sundays between 7:00' a.m. and 11:00 p.m., and on weeknights from 6:30 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. throughout the year, for a period of 20 years from the date hereof. Notwithstanding the foregoing, (i) the Iicense granted herein, does not and shall not extend to those 24 spaces on the western portion of EASTGATE's Parking Area which are marked "W" on Exhibit C hereto, all of which spaces are reserved exclusively for the tenants, invitees and guests of EASTGATE, its successors and assigns, and (ii) with regard to those 22 spaces in the northern portion of EASTGATE's Parking Area marked "S" on Exhibit C hereto, the license granted hereunder is granted for Sunday between 7:00 a.m. and 1 1 :00 p.m. only and shall not be available to GLOBAL at anytime from Monday through Saturday. -- Each_ Each party hereto Neill be responsible for maintaining its parking area in a clean. safe. and debris free condition at all times and to maintain its parking paved and in a state of good repair and first class condition at all times. The parties hereto hereby incorporate by reference that certain Reciprocal Access Agreement set forth in the Declaration of Protective Covenants, Restrictions and Conditions dated January 24, 1968, and recorded January 29, 1968, in Book M- 2762, pages 579-603 of Maps, Official Records of the Los Angeles County, California, as amended and modified, affecting the subject properties and the parties hereto hereby agree to maintain the rights of way which are adjacent to their respective properties and/or constitute access to the dedicated streets of Diamond Bar adjacent to their respective properties as described herein. The parties hereto acknowledge no duty to maintain any right of way not used by the parties and/or their business invitees for direct access to their respective properties. Each license granted herein is personal to each licensee and may be assigned, to a buyer who maintains the same respective uses, namely: an office building for EASTGATE-Is Property and a church and weekend religious school for GLOBAL's Property. EASTGATE shall have the option to terminate this Agreement if the GLOBAL Property is no longer used as a church or if GLOBAL expands to include a day school or daycare center. In the event that the use of the license by either GLOBAL or EASTGATE shall be in violation of the licenses granted herein, then party who shall claim that a violation shall have occurred (the "Claiming Party") will notify the other party, whereupon the other party shall have sixty (60) days within which to correct the violation. In the event that the violation is not timely corrected, then the Claiming Party shall have the option to either commence an action to compel specific performance or terminate this Agreement upon written notice.to:atix, -parry.--Should the -action for specific perfinrmance tail. then the Claiming Party shall. nevertheless. retain the option to terminate this Agreement. No legal title or leasehold interest in GLOBAL's Property or on GLOBAL -s Parking Area is created or vested by the parking license granted herein to EASTGATE. No legal title or leasehold interest in EASTGATE's Property or on EASTGATE's Parking Area is created or vested by the parking license granted herein to GLOBAL. Either party hereto may record this Agreement; however, nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed to create an 11 easement for the benefit of any party hereto, and the within Agreement will at all times be construed to create licenses only. The Agreement will become effective only when GLOBAL closes escrow for the purchase of GLOBAL's Property, which close of escrow is estimated to occur around July 22, 2002. Each license granted hereunder shall be for a term of twenty (20) years, commencing on the date when said escrow closes. The parties hereto agree to execute a Certificate in the form of Exhibit D hereto to confirm the commencement and ending dates of said twenty-year term. 7. f The parties agree to construct a 20 -foot (approximately) driveway northeast of and adjacent to the present northeast boundary of GLOBAL's parking lot, designated "B-1" on Exhibit B hereto, and to extend said driveway southerly to the driveway connecting Sunset Crossing Road, thereby connecting GLOBAL's parking lot to EASTGATE's parking lot, subject to: (1) the approval of the City of Diamond Bar and (2) the joint approval of the parties of all the expenses related thereto. In the event the City of Diamond Bar does not approve of said driveway, or the parties do not jointly approve the said expenses, then a driveway will be constructed in the northeast corner of GLOBAL's Parking Lot. designated "B-2" on Exhibit B hereto. The present trash enclosure on GLOBAL's Par ai Area will be moved from the area indicated on Exhibit B as 7-1 "to an area west of GLOBAL's building. The wall at the northeastern boundary of GLOBAL's parking lot will be either (1) removed or (2) reduced in size to one to three feet in height with planters, as the parties hereto shall jointly determine. The parties hereto agree to cooperate in the construction contemplated herein for the new driveway, relocation of the trash enclosure, and the wall removal or reduction. The parties hereto further agree to share equally the design. engineering, and construction costs therefor. 8. Subject to the signage ordinances of the City of Diamond Bar, and subject to the approval of the other party as to design and location, each party hereto shall have the right to erect a sign at its sole expense for the purpose of directing drivers to the parking areas affected by this Agreement. 9. EASTGATE and GLOBAL further agree to maintain in full force during the term of this Iicense, at each parties own expense, a policy of comprehensive general liability insurance, including property damage, which will insure both parties hereto (as an insured and as an additional insured, as the case may be) against liability for injury to persons, damaged property, and death of any person occurring in or about's EASTGATE property and GLOBAL's property, respectively, Each policy shall be approved as to form and insurance by the other party. The insurance shall be not less than Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00) for any one person injured or killed. not less than Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00) for any one incident, and not less than Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00) for property damage. GLOBAL shall provide EASTGATE with a cop}, of the policy and an endorsement insuring both GLOBAL and EASTGATE (as an insured and as an additional insured, as the case may be), including an endorsement and an Accord 27 Certificate of Insurance which.-AW—that the policy will not be cancelled except after thirty (30) days notice in writing to EASTGATE. EASTGATE shall provide GLOBAL with a copy of the policy and an endorsement insuring both EASTGATE and GLOBAL (as an insured and as an additional insured, as the case may be), including an endorsement and an Accord 27 Certificate of' Insurance which state that the policy will not be cancelled except after thirty (30) days notice in writing to GLOBAL. 10. This Agreement shall automatically terminate upon the expiration of its 20 -year term without the necessity of any further writing between the parties hereto or their successors and/or assigns. In the event the within Agreement is cancelled for cause, the party so cancelling shall have the right to unilaterally record a document confirming that cancellation of this Agreement. IL This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between GLOBAL and EASTGATE relating to the reciprocal parking licenses granted herein. Any prior agreements, promises, negotiations, or representations not expressly set forth in this Agreement are of no force or effect. Any amendment to this Agreement shall be of no force or effect until it is in writing and signed by both parties hereto. 12. The Reciprocal Licensing Agreement for Parking is and shall be binding upon and shall enure to the benefit the parties hereto, their successors and/or assigns. 13. In the event of a legal dispute involving this Agreement, each party hereto waives its right to a jury trial. The prevailing party in such dispute shall be entitled to recover reasonable attornev's fees and costs from the losing party even if the matter does not proceed to trial or to a final judgment. Dated: .luiy 'Z;2--, 2002 Dated: July 1 2002 GLOBAL MISSION CHURCH By: -=per Daniel Kim. Pastor EASTGATE 97 SP LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company By:_� Name:_ Title:_ 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT ,Yfaie of ('uliforrrra ) ) .ss: CountP of Lus Angeli-s ) Oil ,l '?- 2002, before me, Ist`k, v(.it_ personally appeared ----- — t�5S _ " e txe/proved io me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/thrfthey executed'the same in his/kerfdieir authorized capacity. and that by hi s/]gn4hei3•signature on the instrument the person. or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. SHARIA AUGUSTUS i1a CWW*dM IF 12WM Naby hmtc' CWMft to Ma" aNCmrea NovNov _ Place Notary Seal Above CSign r�OfNotarye Public ACKNOWLEDGMENT State {\F,—`Sp t -V,) ss: County of-'-�� ) On 2002, before me, _�c A personally appeared - ,, 0�nflPersnly ; the basis of satisfactory evt ence t be th�rsose name is subscribed to the within instruoved to mement nt and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity, and that by his/her/their signature on the instrument the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the Person acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. JUNE A POLMANO Notary Public - State of New Yotk NO.01 P0490588.5 Qualified in Nassau County MY Commission Ea�lres $ Place Notary Seal Above Signature of Notary Public EXHIBIT "A" THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS REPORT IS SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL I: Lot 7 of Tract 28853, as per map recorded in Book 772 Pages 12 and 13 of Maps, in the office of the county recorder of said county. EXCEPT therefrom all oil, gas, and other hydrdocarbon substances, and minerals now or at any time hereafter situated therein or thereunder or producible therefrom, as reserved in the deed from Transamerica Development Company, recorded March 29, 1968 in Book D1955 Page 185, Official Records of said county, and as modified by a Quitclaim Deed, recorded May 13, 1968, in Book D3999 Page 667, Official Records of said county, which relinquish all rights to the use of the surface and subsurface to a depth of 500 feet from the surface of said land. PARCEL 2: A non-exclusive easement, to be used in common with others, for ingress and egress, public utility, sewer and drainage purposes over, under and across those portions of Lots 4, 5, 8, and 9 of said Tract 28853; lying within the lines of those areas shown as "Private Driveway" on said map of Tract 28853, said easement to be appurtenant to and for the benefit of Parcel 1 above described. PARCEL 3: A non-exclusi.ve easement, to be used in common with others, for ingress and egress, public utility, sewer 'and drainage purposes over, under and across that portion of Lots 1 and 2 of Tract 28853, lying within the lines of that area shown as "Private Driveway" on said mp of Tract 28853, said easement to be appurtenant to and for the benefit of said Parcel 1 above described. Exhibit A � S«E PSN Ii 7U`9 --2e01 MON 11:33RM ID. NOVAK -BASES. GERSTEWELD EXFiIRrr a PAGE:1 I eaa2oe 1 I PG Cb O / 3333oiSF b IN1: :p , to 30400.tS j / r U} 28 �* 6 2aoao}sF 13 r 2-7 r D 12 .3 i _o 18850±SF 13020f51 rW s0 Nllb O ®. 1:3510t5F m % '� U 75iSOfSF i 52230 F �� 1�Z1S�0t5F DRWY �� � 4W SF P zi BK 15 43 76BGa*SF o"� 4 '`r�T� \\♦ �` \ �� �\ 8703,1 �g 34000jSF 6800+ • y ZT200fSF CERTIFICATE CONFIRMING DATES Eastgate 97 SP LLC and Global Mission Church hereby confirm that the term of that certain RECIPROCAL LICENSING AGREEMENT FOR PARKING dated May 9, 2002, is as follows: The term is for twenty (20) years commencing Dated: , 2002 GLOBAL MISSION CHURCH By: Daniel Kim, Pastor Dated: 2002 EASTGATE 97 SP LLC By: Name: Title: EXHIBIT D and ending r,. E N G I N E E R 5 _i .,J TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT GLOBAL MISSION CHURCII Diamond Bar, California Prepared For: GRACE PARTNERSHIP, INC. 550 South Wilton Place Los Angeles, California 90020 Phone: (213) 387-7788 Fax: (213) 387-4567 Prepared By: LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, ENGINEERS 1580 Corporate Drive, Suite 122 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Phone: (714) 641-1587 FAX: (714) 641-0139 e-mail: nguyen@llgengineers.com 2-022366-1 July 3, 2002 Prepared By: Christopher H. Nguyen, P.E. Transportation Engineer II C5 �.n ° 1 ® Philip M. LinscatL P.E. 0924-2000) jack M. Greenspan, P.E. ® ®1 William A. Law, P.E. (Ret.) Paul W. Wilkinson, P.E. John P. Keating, P.E. David S. Shender, P.E. E N G I N E E R S John A. Boarman, P.E. Clare M. Look -Jaeger, P.E. ENGINEERS & PLANNERS o TRAFFIC, TRANSPORTATION, PARKING 7 1580 Corporate Drive, Suite 122 a Costa Mesa, California 92626 Phone: 714 641-1587 • Fax: 714 641-0139 A July 3, 2002 ri Mr. Leo Cho d GRACE PARTNERSHIP, INC. 550 South Wilton Place 1 Los Angeles, California 90020 n LLG Reference No. 2-022366-1 SUBJECT: TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR THE PROPOSED GLOBAL MISSION CHURCH Diamond Bar, California Dear Mr. Cho: As requested, Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) is pleased to submit this Traffic Impact Analysis report for the proposed development of Global Mission Church, located in the City of Diamond Bar. The project site will be developed as a 20,140 SF church, including all 1 ancillary uses. This project will be constructed in one phase and may be completely occupied by the Year 2004. fThis report summarizes the trip generation potential for.the proposed project, develops an ° estimated project traffic distribution pattern, and assigns the project -related trips to the roadway system within the project vicinity. The traffic analysis evaluates the relative traffic impacts of the proposed development at five (5) study intersections for a near-term (Year 2004) and long-term (Year 20 10) horizon year. Briefly, based on the results of our analysis, the intersection of SR -57 SB Ramps at Sunset Crossing Road experiences a significant traffic impact. Contributing to the poor intersection operating conditions include: existing traffic, ambient growth traffic, and project traffic. To mitigate this ° sigilficaut traffic nnpact and restore acceptable service levels, the installation of a three-phase traffic signal is recommended for implementation. The proposed project may be expected to contribute a "fair -share" of the costs associated with the recommended improvements, which amounts to approximately $125. 1'asadon•i - 626 TA, 2 12 2 . San l Fogu � 1,19 2,10 1,, • Las Vegas - 7U2 451.1920 • I ,need 1966 • An L62WB Company • Mr. Leo Cho GRACE PARTNERSHIP, INC. . , LLG Reference No. 2-022366-1 E N G I N E E R S July 3, 2002 Page 2 The remaining four (4) key study intersections, based on the City of Diamond Bar criteria and thresholds, will operate not require any project -specific mitigation improvements. We appreciate the opportunity to prepare this analysis. Should you have any questions or comments regarding the findings and recommendations within this report, please contact our office at (714) 641-1587. Very truly yours, LIINNS'C'OTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, ENGINEERS Q�pFEsv Christopher H. Nguyen, P. � � , Transportation Engineer 11 _ cc: Charlie Koeller 21222 Fem Circle Huntington Beach, California 92646 NA2300Q0223661Report\2366 Cover Lettcr.doc E N G I N E E R 5 V W E N G I N E E R 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE NUMBER , INTRODUCTION............................................................................. I .......................................... PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION................................................................................. 2 EXISTING STREET NETWORK...................................................................................................... 6 EXISTING AREA TRAFFIC VOLUMES ......................... 7 EXISTING INTERSECTION CONDITIONS ......................................:............................................ ICUMethod of Analysis...........................................................................................................7 7 HCM Method of Analysis (Unsignalized Intersections) .............................. .........................12 Existing Level of Service Results .......................................................... ...........12 ...................... TRAFFIC FORECASTING METHODOLOGY ........................................ ....... ............................... IS PROJECT TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS ................................................................................... Project Traffic Generation 15 ...................................................................................................... Project Traffic Distribution and Assignment 15 ............................................................ ........ 17 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC CONDITIONS.................................................................................... AmbientGrowth 21 ... ........ .......................................................................................................... Related Projects Traffic Characteristics 21 ................................................................................ Year 2004 Traffic Volumes 21 ..........................................:........................................................ Year2010 Traffic Volumes 21 ................................................................................................... 21 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY...................................................................... 30 Impact Criteria and Thresholds.............................................................................................. 30 Traffic Impact Analysis Scenarios......................................................................................... 30 PEAK HOUR INTERSECTIONS CAPACITY ANALYSIS...........................................................31 PROJECT -SPECIFIC IMPROVEMENTS....................................................................................... 35 RECOMMENDED SITE ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS................................................................. 35 PERCENTAGE OF NET TRAFFIC IMPACT..................................................................................35 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS...................................................................... 38 E N G I N E E R S LIST OF EXHIBITS EXHIBIT NO. (DESCRIPTION PAGE NO. I VICINITY MAP 2 SITE PLAN ....................... 3 EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS AND INTERSECTION CONTROLS ............................ 4 EXISTING AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ............................ 5 EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES............................................10 6 PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PATTERN .................................. 7 AM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES............................................19 8 PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES ..................... 9 YEAR 2004 BACKGROUND AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ...........22 10 YEAR 2004 BACKGROUND PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ............23 11 YEAR 2004 AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH PROJECT ..........24 12 YEAR 2004 PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH PROJECT ............ 25 13 YEAR 2010 BACKGROUND AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ...........26 14 YEAR 2010 BACKGROUND PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ............27 15 YEAR 2010 AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH PROJECT ..........28 16 YEAR 2010 PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH PROJECT ............ 29 • E N G I N E E R 5 LIST OF TABLES TABLE DESCRIPTION PAGE NUMBER I SUMMARY OF PROJECT DEVELOPMENT TABULATION .......... 4 2 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS 11 3 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS .................................................................... 13 4 EXISTING PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE ................................................ 14 5 PROJECT TRAFFIC GENERATION FORECAST ............................................... 16 6 2004 PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY ....................................... 32 7 2010 PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY ....................................... 33 8 PEAK HOUR PERCENTAGE OF NET TRAFFIC IMPACT ............................... 37 APPENDICES APPENDIX DESCRIPTION A Existing Traffic Count Data B Intersection Service Level Calculation Worksheets - Year 2004 Intersection Capacity Utilization Worksheets - Year 2004Highway Capacity Manual Worksheets - Year 2010 Intersection Capacity Utilization Worksheets - Year 2010 Highway Capacity Manual Worksheets C Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets E N G I N E E R 5 ti e E N G I N E E R S TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT GLOBAL MISSION CHURCH Diamond Bar, California r INTRODUCTION This Traffic Impact Analysis evaluates the potential traffic impacts and circulation needs associated with the development of Global Mission Church, located in the City of Diamond Bar, California. The project site is located along the north side of Sunset Crossing Road, east of r Diamond Bar Boulevard. The proposed project will develop a 20,140 SF church, including all ancillary uses. This project will be constructed in one phase and will be completely occupied by Year 2004. This traffic study analyzes the existing traffic conditions at five (5) intersections within the project vicinity, estimates the trip generation potential of the proposed project, forecasts future intersection operations with and without the proposed potential traffic impacts on the surrounding street system. This afficoreport tisainte dedlt esatisfy the traffic impact requirements of the City of Diamond Bar and be consistent with the 1997 Congestion Management Program (CMP) for Los Angeles County. The project site has been visited and an inventory of adjacent area intersections and roadways has been conducted. Existing peak hour manual turning movemei.t traffic counts were conducted in 7 June 2002 in support of detailed intersection capacity analyses. Information concerning cumulative projects (planned and/or approved) in the vicinity of the project has been researched. Based on our findings, there are no planned projects within the study area., . This traffic report analyzes existing, future near-term (Year 2004),. and future long-term (Year .2010) traffic conditions at five key area intersections, upon completion and full occupancy of the proposed development of Global Mission Church. These intersections, which provide regional and local access to the site area, include: 1. SR -57 SB Ramps at Sunset Crossing Road, _ 2. Diamond Bar Boulevard at Sunset Crossing Road, 3, Golden Springs Drive at Sunsct Crossing Rod, 4. Diamond Bar Boulevard at SR -60 WB Ramps, and 5. Diamond Bar Boulevard at SR -60 EB Ramps. Level of Service (LOS) calculations for the AM and PM peak hours at these five key locations were used to evaluate the near -tern (Year 2004) and long -tern (Year 2010) potential traffic impacts associated with anticipated arca growth and the buildout of the proposed project. Traffic Impact Analysis Report Global Mission Ch arch, Diamond Bar 1 1 _ . s - E N G I N E E R 5 Included in this traffic analysis report are: • Project description, • Existing Year 2002 traffic counts, • Estimated project traffic generation/distribution/assi gement, • AM and PM peak hour analyses for existing conditions (Year 2002) and future conditions (Year 2004 and Year 2010) without and with project traffic, • Recommended off-site improvements, and " • Fair-share cost analysis for recommended improvements. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION _ The project site is located along the north side of Sunset Crossing Road, east of Diamond Bar Boulevard. Exhibit 1 presents a Vicinity Map, which illustrates the general location of the proposed project and depicts the surrounding street system. The project site, which was formerly occupied by a health/fitness club, will be re-developedas a church for a total floor area of 20,140 SF. The Main Sanctuary will have a maximum capacity of 246 seats. In addition, the Global Mission Church will consist of a 1,459 SF Fellowship Hall, a 710 SF Youth Ministry room, a 833 SF Sunday School classroom, two classrooms totaling 749 l SF, a basketball court, general office space, storage areas, a Iobby, a kitchen, and restrooms. Tile J project will be constructed in one phase and will be completely occupied by Year 2004. Table 1 presents the development summary for the proposed uses at the Global Mission Church. Exhibit 2 presents the proposed Site Plan for the Global Mission Church prepared by Grace Partnership, Inc. Site access will be provided via two project driveways. The project's primary driveway is located along Sunset Crossing Road, east of Diamond Bar Boulevard. This driveway will be a full access driveway, allowing all turning movements into and out of the project site. Access to the project will also be provided via a driveway located along Diamond Bar Boulevard, north of Sunset Crossing Road. This driveway also provides access to the adjacent land uses. Based on information provided by Grace Partnership, Inc., only church administration uses will be in full operation during the week. Religious education and adult bible study classes will occur one to two times during the weekday evenings, between 5:00 PM and 10:00 PM. Preschool and/or daycare services will not be provided during the weekdays. Worship services will be held exclusively on Sunday mornings and afternoons. As such, worship services will not be provided during the weekdays at Global Mission Church. Traffic Impact Analysis Report 2 Global Mission Church, Diamond Bar —amwv zooz-sz-" 19:ewz am d y 0 � C w O W Z Q4tn W Z Z �i ZUS'UJ v sv W O II E N G IN E E R 5 TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF PROJECT DEVELOPMLNT TABULATION' Global Mission Church, Diamond Bar I Source: Grace Partnership, Inc - Traffic Impact Analysis Report 4 Global Mission Church, Diamond Bar uwvrouov zooz-sz-oo cf:g*zz- aai Q m Qr p O m O W v 0 j O OC) aZ w0 W U) m t e K 5 Parking will be provided via an on-site surface lot with a total of 49 spaces. Based on the Proposed weekday church operations, on-site parking will be adequate. On Sundays, an additional 140 parking spaces will be available for church patrons at the neighboring office building, located on an adjacent parcel. The additional parking spaces are available per a reciprocal parking agreement between the church and the adjacent parcel. As such, adequate parking for church patrons will likewise be provided on the weekends. EXISTING STREET NETWORK Regional access to the project site is provided by the Orange Freeway (SR -57) and the Pomona Freeway (SR -60), which intersect just southwest of the site. The Pomona Freeway has a full interchange at Diamond Bar Boulevard, south of the project site. The principal local network of streets serving the project site are Diamond Bar Boulevard, Golden Springs Drive, and Sunset Crossing Road. The following discussion provides a brief synopsis of these key area streets. These descriptions are based on an inventory of existing roadway conditions. Diamond Bar Boulevard is oriented in the north -south direction and is located to the west of the project site. Diamond Bar Boulevard generally provides three travel lanes per direction, -street parking is prohibited separated by a raised median. The posted speed Iimit is 40 mph. On along both sides of this arterial, as bike lanes are provided. Traffic signals control the study intersections with Sunset Crossing Road, SR -60 Eastbound Ramps, and SR -60 Westbound Ramps. Sunset Crossing Road is oriented in the east -west direction and is located south of the project site. West of Diamond Bar Boulevard, Sunset Crossing Road provides four undivided travel lanes (two lanes per direction). Within this street segment, the posted speed limit is 40 mph and on -street parking is permitted. East of Diamond Bar Boulevard, Sunset Crossing Road is a two- lane, undivided roadway with a speed limit of 30 mph. On -street parking is permitted along the south side, but is prohibited along the north side. An all -way stop currently controls the study intersection with the SR -57 Southbound Ramps, while a traffic signal currently controls the study intersection with Golden Springs Drive, Golden Springs Drive is an existing east -west, four -lane secondary roadway, located south of the project site. Eastbound and westbound travel lanes are separated by a raised, landscaped median. Parking is prohibited along all sections of this roadway. The posted speed limit on Golden Springs Drive is 50 mph. On -street bike lanes exist on both sides of this roadway. Traffic Iutpact Analysis Report 6 Global Mission Church, Diamond Bar l E N G I N E E R S Exhibit 3 presents an inventory of the this report. The number of travel ]an existing roadway conditions for the intersections l es and intersection controls for the key area -intersections a in identified.re � J EXISTING AREA TRAFFIC VOLUMES Existing AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes for the five key intersections evaluated in this report were obtained via manual rooming and evening e ak Accutek conducted the intersection traffic counts in June 2002.hour turning movement counts. Exhibits 4 and 5 present the existing AM and PM peak hour. traffic volumes for the stud intersections, respectively. y Appendix A contains the detailed manual turning movement count for the key study intersections. -�d EXISTING INTERSECTION CONDITIONS JIntersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Method of Analysis In conformance with the City of Diamond Bar and LA County CMP requirements, existing peak hour operating conditions for the key signalized intersections have been investigated according to the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) method. Th characteristics of signalized e ICU technique reflects the flow intersections and estimates the volume to capacity (V/C) relationship 7 for an intersection based on individual V/C ratios for key conflicting movements. The ICU numerical value represents the percent of required signal green time, and thus capacity, required by existing or future traffic. It should be noted that the ICU methodology assumes uniform n11 traffic distribution per intersection approach lane. Per the Los Angeles County CMP requirements, the ICU calculations use a lane capacity of 1,600 vehicles per hour (vph) for left -turn, through, and right -tum lanes, and a dual left -tum capacity of 2,880 vph. A clearance adjustment (lost time) factor of 10% (0.10) Service calculation. was added to each Level of J The ICU value translates to a Level of Service (LOS) estimate, which is a relative measure of the I intersection performance. The six qualitative categories of Level of Service have been defined along with the corresponding ICU value range, as shown in Table 2. Traffic Impact Analysis Report GloballMlissioar Church, Diamond Bar STOPAY, \ f / " T Sunset 4U 1\ (40) \ A TO 11L \1 \3c a �. 4 o 3 PHASE SIGNAL 3 PHASE rn �C SIGNAL o / o o. 1 03 07 a v �o Rd 2 PHASE SIGNAL Or � — P° PROJECT SITE $ s" � o \ 5 PHASE S \ SIGNAL .i KEY = APPROACH LANE ASSIGNMENT * = FUNCTIONS AS SEPARATE a TURN LANE THOUGH NOT STRIPED TRAFFIC SIGNAL, — = STOP SIGN (XX) = POSTED SPEED LIMIT (MPH) 2 = NUMBER OF TRAVEL LANES D = DIVIDED, U = UNDIVIDED P = PARKING, NP = NO PARKING NO SCALE EXHIBIT 3 UNSCOTT EXISTING LANE CONFIGURATION LAW & GREENSPAN AND INTERSECTION CONTROLS FN G I NNE E R S GLOBAL MISSION CHURCH, DIAMOND BAR 7 tO SCALE EXHIBIT 5 OTT UNSCOTT LAW & ENGINEERS'� GREENSPAN E3aSTING PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES PM I GLOBAL MISSION CHURCH, DIAMOND RAR a E N G I —11i E R S TABLE 2 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Global Mission Church, Diamond Bar 1 Level of Highway Capacity Manual Service (LOS) Delay Value (sec/veh Levet of Service Description 1 A 0.00-0.60 Free Flow B 0.61-0.70 Rural Design C 0.71-0.8o Urban Design D 0.81 —0.90 Maximum Urban Design E 0.91 — 1.00 Capacity F >— 1.01 Forced Flow Notes: I See Appendix B for a detailed explanation of the ICU methodology and LOS Concept l d 7 k Traffic Impact Analysis Report Global Mission Church, Diamond Bar 11 E N G I N E E R S The ICU value is the sum of the critical volume to capacity ratios at an intersection; it is not J City of Diamond Bar criteria, LOS D is the minimum acceptable condition intended to be indicative of the LOS of each of the individual turning movements. According to J maintained during the peak commute hours, or the current LOS if the existing LOthat should be S is worse than LOS D (i.e. LOS E of F). HCM Method of Analysis (Un signalized Intersections) The 2000 HCM unsignalized methodology for stop -controlled intersections was utilized for the analysis of the key unsignalized study intersections. This methodology estimates the average control delay for each of the subject movements and determines the level of service for each movement. The overall average control delay measured in seconds per vehicle, and level of service l is then calculated for the entire intersection. The HCM control delay value translates to a Level of Service (LOS) estimate, which is a relative l measure of the intersection performance. The six qualitative categories of Level of Service have J been defined along with the corresponding HCM control delay value range, as shown g to Table 3. l Appendix B presents the ICU and HCM level of service calculation worksheets for the five key ,J study intersections during the AM and PM peak hours. l Existing Level of Service Results I Table 4 summarizes the existing peak hour service level calculations for the five study intersections based on existing traffic volumes and current street geometry. Review of Table 4 indicates that four of the five key study intersections currently operate at an acceptable Level of Service (LOS D or better) during the AM and/or PM peak commute hours. The remaining key study intersection was found to operate at an adverse service levels during the AM and PM peak hours. -1 The unsignalized intersection of SR -57 SB Ramps at Sunset Crossing Road.currently operates at LOS F during both the AM and PM peak hours. The adverse service level may be attributed to the significant volume of motorists exiting the freeway during the peak commute periods. Traffic Impact Analysis Report Global Mission Church, Diamond Bar �7 7 ENGINEERS TABLE 3 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR UNSIGNALIZE Global Mission Church, Diamond Bar' INTERSECTIONS Level of Control Delay Per Vehicle Service LOS seconds/vehicle Level of Service Descri tion 1 A :510.0 Little or no delay B >10.0and<15.0 Short traffic delays C > 15.0 and:5 25.0 Average traffic delays D > 25.0 and s3 .0 Long traffic delays E > 35.0 ands 50.0 Very long traffic delays F > 50.0 Severe congestion d - 1 1 1 Traffic Impact Analysis Report 13 Global Mission Church, Diamond Bar 1 E N G I N E E R S TABLE 4 EXISTING PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICEZ Global Mission Church, Diamond Bar -T' OM CONTROL ICU r Y/Co KEY INTERSECTIONS PERIOD TYPEnt .,. HCI LOS o 1) SR -57 SB Ramps at A All -Way 276.53 s/v F Sunset Crossin Road PM Sto 145.90 s/v F 2) Diamond Bar Blvd at AM 50 Traffic 0.760 Sunset Crossing Road pM C Si al 0.804 C 3) Golden Springs Drive at AM 50 Traffic 0.404 Sunset Crossing Road PM A Si at 0.271 A 4 Diamond Bar Blvd at AM 30 Traffic 0.557 SR -60 WB Ramps PM A Si ial 5 0.778_ C Diamond Bar Blvd at AM 30 Traffic 0.762 SR -60 EB Ramps PM Si C Signal 0.786 C ------------- 2 A i icndix I3 cuutains the ICU and l ICM calculation worksheets. Traffic Impact Analysis Report 14 Global Mission Church, Diamond Bar E N G I N E E R S TRAFFIC FORECASTING METHODOLOGY In order to estimate the traffic impact characteristics of the proposed has been utilized. The first stepisgeneration,r posed project, amulti-step process departing traffic on a peak hour d dailylbtraffic generIlich imatesation pthentotal forecast by arriving and applying the appropriate vehicle trip generation equations or rates to the project development l tabulation. The second step of the forecasting process is traffic distribution, which identifies the origins and destinations of inbound and outbound project traffic. These origins and destinations are typically based on demographics and existing/expected future travel patterns in the study area. The third step is traffic assignment, which involves the location of Project trc to stuy ar streets and intersections. Traffic assignment is typically tbased on minimization of tra el t mea which may or may not involve the shortest route, depending on prevailing operating conditions and travel speeds. Traffic distribution patterns are indicated by general percentage orientation, while traffic j assignment allocates specific volume forecasts to individual roadway links and intersection turning J movements throughout the study area. a With the forecasting process complete and project traffic assignments developed, the impact of the a project is isolated by comparing operational (LOS) conditions at selected key intersections using expected future traffic volumes with and without forecast project traffic. The need for site-specific 1 and/or cumulative local area traffic improvements can then be evaluated. PROJECT TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS Project Traffic Generation Traffic generation is expressed in vehicle trip ends, defined as one-way vehicular movements, either entering or exiting the generating land use. Generation equations and/or rocs used in the traffic forecasting procedure are found in the Sixth Edition of Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) [Washington D.C., 1997]. 1 Table 5 summarizes the trip generation rates used in forecasting the traffic impacts of thero osed development, and presents the forecast peak hour and dailyp p weekday. Trips generated by the proposed project were a tima eusing g I volumes fora "typical" J (Church) rates, b TC Land Use Code SGO Traffic Impact Analysis Report 15 Global Mission Church, Diamond Bar 1 E N G I N E E R 5 TABLE 5 PROJECT TRAFFIC GENERATION FORECAST' Global Mission Church, Diamond Bar Note: • TE/SF = Trip ends per 1,000 square -feet (SF) of development. 3 Source: Trip Generation 6th Edition, Institute oCTransportation Engineers (ITE) [Washington D C 19971 Traffic Impact Analysis Report Global Mission Church, Diamond Bier 16 ITE Land Use Code/ Project Description Daily AMPeak PM Peak Hour 2 -Way In IOut Total In Out Total Generailon Factors • 560: Church (TE/SF) Generation Forecasts • Global Mission Church (20,140 SF) 9.11 180 0.39 0.33 8 7 0.72 15 0.36 0.30 0.66 7 6 13 Note: • TE/SF = Trip ends per 1,000 square -feet (SF) of development. 3 Source: Trip Generation 6th Edition, Institute oCTransportation Engineers (ITE) [Washington D C 19971 Traffic Impact Analysis Report Global Mission Church, Diamond Bier 16 7 ENG I N E E R5 As shown in Table 5, the proposed Global Mission Church is expected to generate "] two-way trips, with 15 trips (8 inbound, 7 outbound) anticipated during the AM peak180 ,j hour and 13 trips (7 inbound, 6 outbound) produced during the PM peak commute hour. 7 Project Trip Distribution and Assignment The general, directional traffic distribution pattern for the proposed project is presented in Exhibit 6. Project traffic volumes, both entering and exiting the site, have been distributed and assigned to the adjacent street system based on the following considerations: IB1) the site's proximity to major traffic carriers (i.e. SR -57 Freeway, SR -60 Freeway, Diamond ar Boulevard, etc.), 2) project access opportunities and constraints, and ., 3) existing peak hour turning movement volumes. —� The anticipated AM and PM peak hour project volumes associated with the proposed development are presented in Exhibits 7 and 8, respectively. The traffic volume assignments presented in the above mentioned exhibits reflect the traffic distribution characteristics illustrated in Exhibit 6 and the traffic generation forecast presented in Table 5. 7 7 Traffic Impact Analysis Report 17 Global Mission Church, Diamond liar 1 h / \ 57 1'Sg,�v Sy (( c 0 I o I j< `� 1 inset ® 209\ 1\\ ory 5% \ o 1 v I \ n / off° ti 2O% Rd I I m L y �I �� \ o \1 --' I ,og /—I 709 PROJECT SITE _ \ " / 60 p<, i _// POMo�a / KEY EXHIBIT 6 (tNO SCALE C XX% =INBOUND PERCENTAGE � XX% = OUTBOUND PERCENTAGE LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PATTERN FN 0 IRE E R s GLOBAL MISSION CHURCH, DIAMOND BAR IA I \ s / KEY EXHIBIT 6 (tNO SCALE C XX% =INBOUND PERCENTAGE � XX% = OUTBOUND PERCENTAGE LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PATTERN FN 0 IRE E R s GLOBAL MISSION CHURCH, DIAMOND BAR IA I J NO SCALE EXHIBIT 7 UNSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN AM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES FN G I -F#E E R S GLOBAL MISSION CHURCH. DIAMOND nAP MNO SCALE EXHIBIT 8 LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES FN C; INE E R S GLOBAL MISSION CHURCH, DIAMOND BAR OFT,' LAW & GREEN5;PAN E N G I N E E R S 1 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC CONDITIONS j Ambient Growth J Horizon year, background traffic growth estimates have been calculated using an ambient growth J factor. The ambient traffic growth factor is intended to include unknown and future related projects in the study area, as well as account for regular growth in traffic volumes due to the J development of projects outside the study area. To remain conservative, the future growth in traffic volumes has been calculated at two percent (2%) per year. Applied to existing Year 2002 traffic volumes results in a 4% growth in existing volumes at the key study intersections to horizon Year 2004. Similarly, a 16% growth rate was utilized to evaluate future long-term (Year 2010) conditions. Related Projects Traffic Characteristics In order to make a realistic estimate of future on -street conditions prior to complete development of Global Mission Church, the status of other known development projects (related projects) in the area has been researched. With this information, the potential impact of the proposed project can be evaluated within the context of the cumulative impact of all ongoing development. Based on our research and coordination with City staff, there are no planned and/or approved, related projects within the project vicinity. Year 2004 Traffic Volumes Exhibits 9 and 10 present future AM and PM peak hour background traffic volumes, respectively, at the five key study intersections for the near-term (Year 2004) horizon year. Exhibits 11 and 12 present the AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes with the inclusion of traffic generated by Global Mission Church for the near-term (Year 2004) horizon year, respectively. Year 2010 Traffic Volumes Exhibits 13 and 14 present future AM and PM peak hour background traffic volumes, respectively, at the five key study intersections for the long-terni (Year 2010) horizon year. Exhibits 15 and 16 present the AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes with the inclusion of traffic generated by Global Mission Church for the long-term Year 2010 horizon yen, respectively. Traffic Impact Analysis Report 21 Global Mission Cieurcb, Diamond Bar tO SCALE EXHIBIT 9 UNSCOTf LAW & YEAR 2004 BACKGROUND GREENSPAN AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES GLOBAL MISSION CHURCH, DIAMOND BAR �J 7 J J 11 QN SCALA EXHIBIT 12 AW & T LYEAR 2004 PM PEAK HOUR LAW GREENSPAN TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH PROJECT E N G NNE E R S GLOBAL MISSION CHURCH, DIAMOND BAR -1m WNO SCALE EXHIBIT 13 f LAW & YEAR 2010 BACKGROUND LAW 8t GREENSPAN AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES FN c 1 NNE E N S GLOBAL MISSION CHURCH, DIAMOND BAR -1 J \+/NO SCALE EMBIT 14 UNSCOTT LAW & YEAR 2010 BACKGROUND CREENSPAN PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES Ftl 0 1 -flE E R S GLOBAL MISSION CHURCH, DIAMOND BAR �D QC 3� Rd \ 57 / �— \ oyh PROJECT SITE / 6 \ Sunset �85 423 \ i�P y , 33` / J F+y 361 ( co _— '\921 n�� 60 \ \A peooroh ?p010( o pr A p 0 a c o 0 G�cccA '� Q a 9 57 60 0 °c 0 a e WNO SCALE EXHIBIT 15 UNSCOTT YEAR 2010 AM PEAK HOUR LAW � GREENSPAN TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH PROJECT RE ENGINEERS GLOBAL MISSION CHURCH, DIAMOND BAR 7A I N NO SCALE EXHIBIT 16 UNSCorr LAW & YEAR 2004 PM PEAK HOUR GREENSPAN TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH PROJECT l E N G I N E E R s GLOBAL MISSION CHURCH. DIAMONn RAR 29 I s :J • MR E N G I N E E R 5 I TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY Impact Criteria and Thresholds :J The relative traffic impacts of the added traffic generatedby the proposed project for the AM and J PM peak hours have been evaluated based upon an analysis of the future operating conditions at the 1, five key study intersections, without, then with, the proposed project. The previously discussed capacity analysis procedures were utilized to investigate the future volume -to -capacity relationships and service level characteristics at each study intersection. The J significance of the potential impacts of the project at each key intersection was then evaluated using the City's LOS standards. The City of Diamond Bar considers LOS D to be the minimum acceptable condition that should be maintained during the peak commute hours. Per the LA County CMP criteria, a significant traffic impact occurs when a project increases traffic demand at a study intersection and causes intersections operations to deteriorate from an acceptable service level (LOS D or better) to an adverse service level (LOS E or F). In addition, per the ICU methodology, the LA County CMP criteria also identifies a significant project impact when the project increases traffic demand at a study intersection by 2% of capacity (ICU >_ 0.020), causing or worsening unacceptable LOS E or F conditions. Traffic Impact Analysis Scenarios The following scenarios are those for which LOS calculations have been performed: 7 1) Existing Year 2002 Traffic Conditions 2) Year 2004: Future Background (Existing plus Ambient Growth) 3) Year 2004: Future Background with project traffic (100% occupancy) 4) Scenario (3) with Mitigation, if necessary 5) Year 2010: Future Background (Existing plus Ambient Growth) 6) Year 2010: Future Background with project traffic (100% occupancy) 7) Scenario (6) with Mitigation, if necessary I 'j Traffic Impact Analysis Report J Global Mission Church, Diamond Bar 30 PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS J Tables 6 and 7 summarize the peak hour Level of Service results at the five key study intersections for the near-term (Year 2004) and long-term (Year 20 10) horizon years, respectively. 1 The first column (1) of values in Tables 6 and 7 present a summary of existing AM and PM peak _ hour traffic conditions (which were also presented in Table 3). The second column (2) in Tables 6 and 7 present Year 2004 and Year 2010 background traffic conditions, respectively, without any traffic generated from the proposed project. The background J traffic conditions have been analyzed based on existing intersection geometries. -7 The third column (3) in Tables 6 and 7 present future near-term and long-term traffic conditions I with the addition of traffic generated by the proposed development of Global Mission Church. The fourth column (4) in Tables 6 and 7 show the increase in ICU value due to the added peak hour project trips and indicates whether the traffic associated with the project will have a �j significant impact based on the LA County CMP significance criteria. J The fifth column (5) in Tables 6 and 7 present the intersection operating conditions based on the total anticipated near-term (Year 2004) and long-term (Year 2010) traffic volumes and recommended intersection improvements (mitigation measures). Traffic Impact Analysis Report J 31 Global Mission Church, Diamond Bar _ d I I hM7 a J ti ti 6 M M E N G I N E E R 5 Existing Year 2002 Conditions ;j As previously presented in Table 4, review of this table indicates that four of the five study JJ intersections currently operate at an acceptable service level during the AM and PM peak hours. The remaining intersection, SR -57 SB Ramps at Sunset Crossing Road, currently operates at an ,J adverse service level during the AM and PM peak hours. Year 2004 Future Background Traffic Conditions An analysis of future (Year 2004) background traffic conditions indicates that the same intersection currently operating at an adverse service level will continue to operate at an adverse service level. The remaining four key study intersections are expected to continue to operate at adequate service levels (LOS D or better) during the weekday AM and PM peak commute hours. Year 2004 with Global Mission Church Project Traffic At completion and full occupancy of the proposed project, the intersection of SR -57 SB Ramps at Sunset Crossing Road is forecast to continue to operate at LOS F during both the AM and PM peak hours. Evaluation of this intersection indicates that the installation of a traffic signal at this unsignalized intersection will mitigate the significant traffic impacts of existing, future background, and project traffic (See Appendix C for signal warrant worksheets). Due to the fact that this intersection warrants a traffic signal based on existing traffic, the proposed project merely contributes to the adverse impacts. Based on the significance criteria of the City of Diamond Bar, the proposed project is not expected to have an adverse impact at any of the remaining four intersections. As discussed earlier, a significant project impact occurs when the project increases traffic demand at a study intersection by 2% of capacity (ICU >_ 0.020), causing or worsening LOS E or F conditions. Year 2010 Future Background Traffic Conditions An analysis of future (Year 2010) background traffic conditions indicates that two study intersections are forecast to operate at adverse service levels. The intersection of Diamond Bar Boulevard at Sunset Crossing Road is anticipated to degrade to LOS E (from LOS D) during the PM peak hour. The intersection of SR -57 SB Ramps at Sunset Crossing Road is expected to continue to operate at LOS F during the weekday AM and PM peak commute hours. The remaining three key study intersections are forecast to continue to operate at acceptable levels of service during the AM and PM peak hours. Year 2010 with Global Mission Church Proiect Traffic Based on future long -terns conditions with project traffic, two key study intersections are forecast to continue to operate at adverse service levels. The three remaining key study intersections are expected to continue to operate atadequate service levels (LOS C) during the weekday AM and PM peak commute hours. 't Traffic Impact Analysis Report Global Mission Church, Diamond Bar j 34 J E N G I N E E R 5 The intersection of SR -57 SB Ramps at Sunset Crossing Road is forecast to continue to operate at j LOS F during both the AM and PM peak hours, assuming that a traffic signal is not implemented. The proposed project is anticipated to contribute to the adverse impacts at this intersection. 1 The intersection of Diamond Bar Boulevard at Sunset Crossing Road is anticipated to continue to operate at an adverse service level (i.e., LOS E) during the PM peak hour at completion of the proposed project. However, based on the significance criteria of the City of Diamond Bar, the proposed project is not expected to have an adverse impact at this intersection. Project traffic will increase the ICU value at this intersection by less than 2%. As discussed earlier, a significant project impact occurs when the project increases traffic demand at a study intersection by 2% of capacity (ICU >_ 0.020), causing or worsening LOS E or F conditions. PROJECT -SPECIFIC IMPROVEMENTS —� The results of the level of service analysis indicate that existing traffic, in combination with future background and Global Mission Church project traffic, will significantly impact one of the five study intersections. Therefore, area traffic improvement measures are required to mitigate this significant traffic impact. The following recommended improvements are expected to: 1) mitigate the impact of existing traffic, future background, and project traffic, and/or 2) improve Levels of Service to an acceptable range. As shown in Tables 6 and 7, the intersections of SR -57 SB Ramps at Sunset Crossing Road is projected to operate at unacceptable LOS F during the AM and PM peak hours for the future near- term and long-term horizon years. The service level at this key intersection may be improved to an acceptable level (LOS D or better) by implementing the following improvements: SR -57 SB Ramps at Sunset Crossing Road Based on the existing and forecasted traffic volumes and the Traffic Manual's Peak Hour _ Traffic Volumes Warrant, a three-phase traffic signal is recommended for installation at this intersection. A traffic signal at this study intersection is anticipated to minimize vehicular delays and improve overall intersection operations. The proposed project can be expected to a pay a "fair -share" of the construction costs associated with these improvements. PERCENTAGE OF NET TRAFFIC IMPACT The percentage of net traffic impact due to the proposed project has been calculated at the intersection of SR -57 SB Ramps at Sunset Crossing Road for the near-term horizon year (Year w 2004). Traffic Impact Analysis Report Global Mission Church, Diamond Bar 35 E N G I N E E R 5 Table 8 presents the AM and PM peak hour percentage of net traffic impact for the key study intersection. As presented in this table, the first column (1) presents a total of all intersection peak hour movements for existing conditions. The second column (2) presents future Year 2004 background traffic conditions, which includes ambient traffic growth. The third column (3) presents future Year 2004 traffic conditions with the addition of project traffic. The fourth column (4) presents a fair -share percent estimate for which Global Mission Church is responsible. As shown, the intersection of SR -57 SB Ramps at Sunset Crossing Road experiences a project percent increment of 0.1% during both the AM and PM peak hours. These percentages were calculated based on the following: Project's Fair Share = Project -Generated Trips Total Trips AM peak hour = 2 project trips = 0.1% 1,449 vehicle trips PM peak hour = 2 project trips = 0.1% 1,355 vehicle trips These percentages represent the project's approximate monetary fair -share contribution to the future improvements implemented at the intersection of SR -57 SB Ramps at Sunset Crossing Road. Therefore, with an estimated construction cost of $125,000 the project's fair -share contribution would be approximately $125.6 6 Please note that the quoted construction cost is a preliminary estimate, prepared by LLG, and is provided strictly for informational purposes. The actual costs of the improvements may be more or less, but will ultimately be detennined by [tic contractor. Traffic Impact Analysis Report Global Mission Church, Diamond Bar 36 I E N G I N E E R 5 TABLE 8 PEAK HOUR PERCENTAGE OF NET TRAFFIC IMPACT Global Mission Church, Diamond Bar Note. • Project Percent Increment (4) = (Column (3) — Column (2)1 / Column (3). Traffic Impact Analysis Report Global Mission Church, Diamond Bar 37 ) (2) (3) (4) Year 2004 Year 2004 ILE-Xis"g Time ,:.Background w/Project Fair -Share Ke Intersections Periodfc Traffc Traffic Percent 1) SR -57 SB Ramps at AM 1,391 1,447 1,449 0.1% Sunset Crossing Road J1 PM 1,301 1,353 1,355 0,1% Note. • Project Percent Increment (4) = (Column (3) — Column (2)1 / Column (3). Traffic Impact Analysis Report Global Mission Church, Diamond Bar 37 I E N G I N E E R. 5 J! SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS �' • Project Description — The project site, formerly occupied by a health/fitness club, will be re- developed as a church for a total floor area of 20,140 SF. The project includes a Main Sanctuary with a maximum capacity of 246 seats and several ancillary uses. The project will be constructed in one phase and will be completely occupied by Year 2004. • Study Scope — The following intersections were selected for detailed peak hour level of service analyses under Existing (Year 2002) Traffic Conditions, Year 2004 Background Traffic Conditions without and with Project Traffic Conditions, and Year 2010 Future Background without and with Project Traffic Conditions: 1. SR -57 SB Ramps at Sunset Crossing Road, 2. Diamond Bar Boulevard at Sunset Crossing Road, 3. Golden Springs Drive at Sunset Crossing Road, 4. Diamond Bar Boulevard at SR -60 WB Ramps, and 5. Diamond Bar Boulevard at SR -60 EB Ramps. The analysis focused on assessing potential traffic impacts during the morning and evening commute peak hours on a typical weekday. J Existing Traffic Conditions — Four of the five key study intersections currently operate at an J acceptable Level of Service (LOS D or better) during the AM and/or PM peak commute hours. The remaining study intersection (i.e., SR -57 SB Ramps at Sunset Crossing Road) was found to operate at adverse service levels during the peak hours. • Project Trip Generation — Based on Trip Generation (Sixth Edition), the proposed project is expected to generate 180 daily, two-way trips, with 15 trips (8 inbound, 7 outbound) anticipated during the AM peak commute hour and 13 trips (7 inbound, 6 outbound) produced during the PM peak commute hour. • Year 2004 Future Background Traffic Conditions — An analysis of future background traffic conditions indicate that the intersection of SR -57 SB Ramps at Sunset Crossing Road will continue to operate at an adverse service level. The remaining four key study intersections are expected to continue to operate at adequate service levels (LOS D or better) during the weekday AM and PM peak commute hours. Traffic Impact Analysis Report Global Mission Church, Diannond Bar 38 t N U1 N E E R S • Yearwil with Project Traffic — The results of the traffic analysis indicate that the proposed 04 projectt will contribute to the significant traffic impact at the intersection of SR -57 SB Ramps at Sunset Crossing Road. Based on the significance criteria of the City of Diamond Bar, the project is not expected to have an adverse impact at any of the remaining four intersections. • Year 2010 Future Background Traffic Conditions — An analysis of future (Year 2010) background traffic conditions indicates that two intersections are forecast to operate at adverse service levels. These two intersections include SR -57 SB Ramps at Sunset Crossing Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard at Sunset Crossing Road. The remaining three intersections are expected to continue to operate at adequate service levels (LOS D or better) during the weekday AM and PM peak commute hours. • Year 2010 wit" Project Traffic — Similar to Year 2004 with project findings, the proposed project will contribute to the significant traffic impact ate intersection of SR -57 SB Ramps at Sunset Crossing Road in Year 2010. Based on the significance criteria of the City of Diamond Bar, the project is not expected to have an adverse impact at any of the remaining four key study intersections. • Project -Specific Improvements — The following improvements are recommended to improve intersection operating conditions: ❑ SR -57 SB Ramps at Sunset Crossing Road — Based on the existing and forecasted traffic volumes and the Traffic Manual's Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Warrant (No. 11), a three-phase traffic signal is recommended for installation at this intersection. A traffic signal at this study intersection is anticipated to minimize vehicular delays and improve overall intersection operations. • Percentage of Net Traffic Impact — The percentage of net traffic impact due to the proposed project has been calculated at the intersection of SR -57 SB Ramps at Sunset Crossing Road, based on near-term (Year 2004) traffic projections. The project's fair -share contribution was determined to be 0.1% of all costs associated with the installation of a traffic signal, which amounts to approximately $125. N:\230012022366V2cport12366'1'rafric Impact Malysis.doc Traffic Impact Analysis Report 39 Global Mission Church, Diamond Bar E N C I N E E R 5 E N G I N E E R S APPENDIX A EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNT DATA I< ACCUTEK >> «21114 TRIGGER LANE >> << DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765» « (909)595-6199 FAX: (909)595-6022 > File Name : 311704 Site Code :00311704 Start Date : 06/18/2002 Page No : I 08:00 AM 42 SR -57 SB RAMP Southbound 139 SUNSET CROSSING RD. Westbound 23 Northbound 0 SUNSET CROSSING RD. Easlbound 0 Start Time Right Thru Lett App' Total Right Thru Left App' Total Rlght Thru Left App' Right Thru I left App• tnt Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 0 0 1.0 16 0 97 113 24 19 Total 1.0 0 0 0 Total Total 07:00 AM . 41 0 214 255 13 17 0 301 0 0 0 0j 0 30 3 33 1 318 07:15 AM 42 0 214 256 21 19 0 40, 0 0 0 01 0 53 6 591 355 07:30 AM 57 0 220 277 9 28 0 37 0 0 0 0, 0 49 6 55 I 369 07.45 AM 47 0 208 255 17 32 0 49 0 0 0 00 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 41 4 45 I 344 Total 187 0 856 1043 I 60 96 0 156 1 0 0 0 0i n 173 10 107 1101 08:00 AM 42 0 139 181 23 33 0 561 0 0 0 08:15 AM 15 0 101 116 31 25 0 56 0 0 0 08:30 AM 11 0 98 109 ' 25 21 0 46 0 0 0 08:45 AM 16 0 97 113 24 19 0 43 0 0 0 Total 84 0 435 519 103 98 0 201 0 0 0 *** BREAK *** 04.00 PM 17 07:45 AM 6:45:00 AM 0 176 193 30 28 0 58 0 0 0 0! 0 24 4 281 279 04:15 PM 13 0 183 196 32 25 0 57 0 0 0 0 0 26 6 32285 04:30 PM 21 0 160 181 32 35 0 67 0 0 0 0' 0 35 2 371 285 04:45 PM 21 0 166 187 31 45 0 76 0 0 0 01 0 25 6 311 294 Total 72 0 685 757 125 133 0 258 0 0 0 01 0 110 18 1281 1143 05:00 PM 23 0 191 214 41 38 0 79 0 0 0 0 0 28 5 33 326 05:15 PM 27 0 170 197 35 28 0 63 0 0 0 0 0 45 6 51 311 05:30 PM 21 0 189 210 27 43 0 70 0 0 0 0 0 38 6 44 324 05:45 PM 23 0 177 200 34 68 0 102 0 0 0 0 0 35 3 38 340 Total 94 0 727 821 137 177 0 314 0 0 0 0 0 146 20 166 1301 Grand Total 437 0 2703 31401 425 504D 9291 0 D 0 0 I 0 595 81 6761 4745 Apprch % 13.9 0.0 86.1 45.7 54.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 88.0 12.0 Total % 9.2 0.0 57.0 66.2 9.0 10.6 0.0 19.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.01 0.0 12.5 1.7 14.2 westooun 1 Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right C Thru Leftt ApotT a� Right Thru LeR TO S Right Thru Left T PPS I Right Thru left + App• Int. T i r T 1 1 Peak Hour From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 07:00 AM Volume 187 0 Percent 17.9 0.0 0 51 4 551 292 D 0 44 9 53I 225 0 J00 0 42 3 45 200 0 0 29 8 37 193 0.0 90.1 0 166 24 190 910 0 176 193 30 28 0 58 0 0 0 0! 0 24 4 281 279 04:15 PM 13 0 183 196 32 25 0 57 0 0 0 0 0 26 6 32285 04:30 PM 21 0 160 181 32 35 0 67 0 0 0 0' 0 35 2 371 285 04:45 PM 21 0 166 187 31 45 0 76 0 0 0 01 0 25 6 311 294 Total 72 0 685 757 125 133 0 258 0 0 0 01 0 110 18 1281 1143 05:00 PM 23 0 191 214 41 38 0 79 0 0 0 0 0 28 5 33 326 05:15 PM 27 0 170 197 35 28 0 63 0 0 0 0 0 45 6 51 311 05:30 PM 21 0 189 210 27 43 0 70 0 0 0 0 0 38 6 44 324 05:45 PM 23 0 177 200 34 68 0 102 0 0 0 0 0 35 3 38 340 Total 94 0 727 821 137 177 0 314 0 0 0 0 0 146 20 166 1301 Grand Total 437 0 2703 31401 425 504D 9291 0 D 0 0 I 0 595 81 6761 4745 Apprch % 13.9 0.0 86.1 45.7 54.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 88.0 12.0 Total % 9.2 0.0 57.0 66.2 9.0 10.6 0.0 19.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.01 0.0 12.5 1.7 14.2 westooun 1 Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right C Thru Leftt ApotT a� Right Thru LeR TO S Right Thru Left T PPS I Right Thru left + App• Int. T i r T 1 1 Peak Hour From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 07:00 AM Volume 187 0 Percent 17.9 0.0 856 82.1 1043 60 96 38.5 61.5 0 0.0 156 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 173 19 192 1391 flm 0.0 90.1 9.9 57 0 Volume e 220 2771 9 28 0 371 0 0 0 0 0 49 6 55 369 Peak Factor 1 High Int. 07:30 AM Volume 07:45 AM 6:45:00 AM 07:15 AM 0.942 57 0 Peak Factor 220 277 1 17 32 0 491 • 0 0 0 01 0 53 6 59 1 0.941, 0.796 1 0,814 Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 05:90 PM Volume 94 0 Percent 727 8211 137 177 0 314 0 0 0 0 i 0 146 20 1 1661 1301 11.4 0.0 88.6 43.6 56.4 0.0 1Volume 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 88.0 12.0 05:45 23 0 177 2001 34 68 0 102 0 0 0 01 0 35 3 38 340 Peak Factor High Int. 05:00 PM 05: I PM 05:15 PM 0.957 Volume 23 0 Peak Factor 191 21,1 34 68 0 102 0 0 0 0 0 45 6 51I 0.9591 0.770 1 ! 0.814 A- I <<ACCUTEK «21114 TRIGGER LANE » << DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 » «(909) 595-6199 FAX: (909) 595.6022 > File Name :311703 Site Code : 0031170: Start Date : 06118/201 Page No : 1 08:00 AM DIAMOND BAR BLVD. SUNSET CROSSING ROAD DIAMONE BAR BLVD. SUNSET CROSSING ROAD I 11 30 Southbound 32 268 Westbound 324 139 Northbound Appl 1921 Eastbound App. i Int. Start Time Rlght Thru Left Total Right Thru Left fpla� Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left Total Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 22 1.0 1.0 1.0 293 1.0 1.0 1.0 11 1.01 1.01 4 1.0 17 241 633 07:00 AM 11 141 2 154 13 11 59 83 16 133 6 155 220 4 37 255 717 07:15 AM 18 163 0 181 14 14 39 67 13 189 12 214 214 5 45 277 822 07:30 AM 11 187 2 200 21 11 11 44 36 76 69 11 23 244 273 14 18 269 314 227 214 8 37 259 839 07:45 AM -rural 20 6n 175 666 2 6 19722 7321 32 70 47 178 295 63 839 50 9521 875 21 136 1032 3011 08:00 AM 21 128 5 154 15 11 30 56 32 268 24'' 324 139 10 43 1921 726 08:15 AM 26 113 7 146 14 17 34 65 26 272 14 312 106 7 34 147 670 08:30 AM 16 84 5 105 17 22 25 64 29 293 9 331 112 11 38 161 661 WAS AM 14 118 3 135 19 19 27 65 22 244 11 277 88 7 40 1351 612 Total 77 443 20 540 65 69 116 250 109 1077 58 1244 445 35 155 635, 2669 *** BREAK *** 04:00 PM 16 110 10 136 6 17 33 56 21 272 25 318 141 16 28 185 69_ 04:15 PM 24 134 4 162 10 11 24 45 39 288 16 343 178 10 21 209 04:30 PM 19 133 10 162 12 22 30 64 34 286 24 344 153 12 20 185 75! 04:45 PM 29 132 it 172 12 14 15 41 30 273 34 337 145 15 27 187 73. Total 88 509 35 632 40 64 102 206 1241119 99 1342 617 53 96 766 294E 05:00 PM 34 111 11 156 17 21 30 68 42 273 26 341 167 18 26 2111 77( 05:15 PM 23 137 9 169 9 22 31 62 48 303 21 372 159 18 33 210 813 05:30 PM 28 121 5 154 18 15 29 62 47 309 27 383 170 17 29 216 B1! 05:45 PM 38 100 10 148 12 25 33 70 39 315 %41 395 168 20 29 2171 83( Total 123 469 35 627 56 83 123 262 176 1200 115 1491 664 73 117 8541 323, Grand Total 348 2087 96 21311 231 263 519 10131 472 4235 322 5029 12601 182 504 32871 11861 Apprch % 13.7 62.5 3.8 22.8 26.0 51.2 9.4 84.2 6.4 79.1 5.5 15.3 Total % 2.9 17.6 0.8 21.3 1.9 2.2 4.4 8.5 4.0 35.7 2.7 42.4 21.9 1.5 4.2 27.7 In Tot YeaK Hour r'1U111 Vl- 1- w uo.v Intersection 07:15 AM Volume 70 653 9 732 72 47 149 268 79 974 68 1121 794 27 162 983' 310 Percent 9.6 89.2 1.2 26.9 17.5 55.6 7.0 86.9 6.1 1 80.8 2.7 16.5 1 074520 175 2 197 22 li 36 691 23 273 18 314 214 8 37 259! 83 Volume 10.925 Peak Factor High Int. 07:30 AM 07:30 AM 08:00 AM 07:30 AM Volume 11 187 2 200 21 11 44 76 32 268 24 324 227 5 45 277 Peak Factor 0.915 0.882 0.865 0.887 Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 05:00 PM Volume 123 469 35 6271 56 83 123 262 176 1200 lis 1491 664 73 117 854 323 Percent 19.6 74.8 5.6 21.4 31.7 46.9 11.8 80.5 7.7 77.8 8.5 13.7 OS:45 38 100 10 148 12 25 33 70 39 315 41 395 168 20 29 2171 8: Volume 10.971 Peak Factor High Int. 05:15 PM 105:45 PM 05:45 PM 05:45 PM Volume 23 137 9 169 12 25 33 701 39 315 41 395 168 20 29 217 ! Peak Factor 0.928 0.9361 0.944 0.984 A-2- DIAMOND BAR BLVD. SUNSET CROSSING ROAD DIAMONE BAR BLVD. SUNSET CROSSING ROAD Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound StaftTime Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left Tptei Right Thru Left Total A Right Tru Leff Total In Tot YeaK Hour r'1U111 Vl- 1- w uo.v Intersection 07:15 AM Volume 70 653 9 732 72 47 149 268 79 974 68 1121 794 27 162 983' 310 Percent 9.6 89.2 1.2 26.9 17.5 55.6 7.0 86.9 6.1 1 80.8 2.7 16.5 1 074520 175 2 197 22 li 36 691 23 273 18 314 214 8 37 259! 83 Volume 10.925 Peak Factor High Int. 07:30 AM 07:30 AM 08:00 AM 07:30 AM Volume 11 187 2 200 21 11 44 76 32 268 24 324 227 5 45 277 Peak Factor 0.915 0.882 0.865 0.887 Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 05:00 PM Volume 123 469 35 6271 56 83 123 262 176 1200 lis 1491 664 73 117 854 323 Percent 19.6 74.8 5.6 21.4 31.7 46.9 11.8 80.5 7.7 77.8 8.5 13.7 OS:45 38 100 10 148 12 25 33 70 39 315 41 395 168 20 29 2171 8: Volume 10.971 Peak Factor High Int. 05:15 PM 105:45 PM 05:45 PM 05:45 PM Volume 23 137 9 169 12 25 33 701 39 315 41 395 168 20 29 217 ! Peak Factor 0.928 0.9361 0.944 0.984 A-2- ACCUTEK «21114 TRIGGER LANE >> -DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 >> << (909) 595-6199 FAX: (909) 595.6022 > File Name :311705 Site Code 00311705 Start Date : 06/18/2002 Page No : 1 Southbound ""'-"Iry JNRING DR, SUNSET CROSSING RD. Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Toted Right Thru Left T� Right Thru Left T �� Right Thru Left APP• Int, I Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Total Total 07:00 AM 5 94 0 99 2' 1 2 5 0 44 2 46 3 0 7 10 160 07:15 AM 18 143 2 163 3 1 2 6 0 84 5 89 7 1 7 15 273 07:30 AM 18 173 1 192 2 0 2 4 0 68 13 81 12 0 5 17 294 07:45 AM 13 163 2 178 0 0 0 D 0 114 18 132 25 0 23 48 358 Total 54 573 5 6321 7 2 6 L5. 0 310 38 348 47 1 42 9of 1085 08:00 AM 26 121 0 1471 0 4 2 6 ' 3 96 31 1301 43 2 44 891 372 08:15 AM 15 90 0 105 2 2 3 7 1 1 55 13 69 44 1 40 85, 266 08:30 AM 10 63 0 73 ( 2 4 1 7 1 0 62 12 74 13 2 7 22 176 08:45 AM 10 63 1 74 1 1 1 1 3 0 57 L1 68 9 2 8 19 164 Total 61 337 1 3991 5 11 7 231 4 270 67 341 I 109 7 99 215 978 ** BREAK *** 04:00 PM 3 31 1 35 0 0 1 1 1 0 58 6 64 6 1 6 13 113 04:15 PM 5 73 3 81 0 1 1 2 0 66 11 77 9 0 5 14 174 04:30 PM 5 80 2 87 0 0 2 21 90 16 107 17 3 3 23 219 04:45 PM 3 82 4 89 2 0 0 2 0 85 6 93 10 1 6 17 201 Total 16 266 10 2921 Z 1 4 7; 1 299 41 341 42 5 20 67 707 05:00 PM 3 82 0 85 1 3 0 4 2 102 15 119 13 1 11 251 233 05:15 PM 3 loo 0 103 1 0 1 2I 1 109 11 121 18 0 9 27 253 05:30 PM 4 85 0 89 1 0 0 1� 4 96 9 109 12 1 12 25 224 05:45 PM 11 70 2 83 0 0 1 1 1 102 18 121 11 1 7 19 224 Total 21 337 2 360 3 3 2 8 8 409 53 470 54 3 39 96 934 3rand Total 152 1513 18 16831 17 17 19 531 13 1288 199 1500 Z52 L6 200 q68 Ap % .0 89.9 1.1 32.1 32.1 35.8 0.9 85.9 13.3 53.8 3.4 42.7 Totalotal 4 % .1 40,8 0.5 45.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.4 0.4 34.8 5.4 40.5 6.8 0.4 5.4 12.6 1 37p370,1 GOLDEN SPRINGS DR. SUNSET CROSSING RD. GOLDEN SPRING DR. CROSSING RD. Southbound _ Westbound Northbound astbound Hr-meht IL Thru Left i Total Right Thru Left APP' Right Thru Left APP' RightApp. Itl 3k Hour From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak i of Total Total u Left Total Total ttersection 07:15 AM Volume 75 600 5 6801 5 S 6 161 3 362 67 432 87 3 79 1691 1297 Percent 11.0 88.2 0;7 31.3 31.3 37,5 0.7 83.8 i5.5 08:00 i 1 51.5 1.8 46.7 Volume 26 121 0 147 i 0 4 2 61 3 96 31 130 43 2 44 89 372 eak Factor High Int. 07:30 AM07:15 AM 07:45 AM 0.872 Volume 18 173 1 1921 3 1 2 6 0 114 18 13210843 AM 2 44 89 oak Factor 0.8851 0.667 0.818 0.475 k Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 tersecUon 05:00 PM Volume 21 337. 2 360 ! 3 3 2 8 8 4097.0 53 410 ( .3 3 39 961 934 Percent 5.8 93.6 0.6 ! 37.5 37.5 Z5.0 1 1.7 87.0 11.3 05:15 56.3 3.1 40.6 1 Volume 3 100 0 1031 1 0 1 2 1 109 it 121 i 18 0 9 27 I 253 ak Factor ; High Int, 05:15 PM ! 05:00 PM i 0.923 Volume 3 100 0 103 j 1 3 0 4 OS:iS PM 09 it 121 1 05:15 PM 0 9 27 ak Factor 0.874 1 0,500 0.971 0.8891 A•3 « ACCUTEK » «21114 TRIGGER LANE» « DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 » « (909)595-6199 FAX: (909) 595-6022 > File Name : 300701 Site Code :00311701 Start Date :06/1812002 Page No :1 Southbound WesmoLe iht ru yV 1.0 App 1.0 1.00 120 App. App' Start Time Right ThN Left Total Right Thru Left Total Right Thru left Total Right Thru LeR' Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 07:00 AM o 277 60 337 0 0 0 0 69 156 0 225 13 07:15 AM 0 264 61 325 0 0 0 0 125 155 0 280 10 0 21 07:30 AM 0 367 56 423 0 0 0 0 134 188 0 322 25 0 31 0 31 07:45 AM 0 382 50 432 0 0 0 0 99 225 0 324 19 Total U 1290 227 1517 0 0 0 0 427 724 0 1151 67 0 110 08:00 AM D 258 40 298 0 0 0 0 68 214 0 2821 17 0 38 D 75 226 0 303 10 0 21 08:15 AM 0 230 43 273 0 0 0 0 70 233 0 303 8 1 39 08:30 AM 0 212 39 251 0 0 0 0 59 163 0 222 6 0 39 08:45 AM 0 201 32 233 0 0 0 D 272 838 0 1110 41 1 137 Intal D 901 154 1055 0 0 0 t�tr46O2 tail 55 I 635 31 607 481 602 45 500 179 2344 *** BREAK *** 0 21 55 66 6750 04:00 PM D 213 126 339 0 0 0 0 97 175 196 0 0 272 300 34 23 o 21 44 750 04:15 PM 0 222 164 406 0 0 0 0 10 1 194 0 305 21 0 22 43 738 04:30 PM 0 227 163 390 0 0 0 0 0 0 97 160 0 277 24 0 28 52 700. 2854 04:45 PM 0 220 151 371. 0 0 0 409 745 0 1154 102 0 92 194 Total 0 882 624 1506 0 0 05:00 PM 0 254 151 405 0 0 0 00 82 183 0 0 265 276 27 29 0 0 24 0 67 51 67 721 05:15 PM 0 292 147 439 0 0 0 00 83 88 182 0 270 46 0 5193 97 773 05:30 PM 0 263 143 406 0 0 0 21 0 23 23 44 44 716 7 16 05:45 PM 0 241 141 382 0 0 0 0 0 354 747 0 110101 0 123 0 136 254 2992 Total 0 1050 582 1632 0 0 809 11035 Grand Total 0 4123 1587 5710 0 0 0 0 11462 3054 32.4 67.6 0 0.0 4516 I 333 41.2 1 0.1 475 58.7 Apprch % 0.0 72.2 27.8 I D.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.2 27.7 0.0 40.9 3.0 0.0 4.3 7.3 Total % 0.0 37.4 14.4 51.7 0.0 DIAMOND BAR BLVD. SR -60 EB RAMP DIAMOND BAR BLVD. Northbound SR -60 EB RAMP Eastbound Int. Southbound App.1 Westbound App' Right Thru Left App' Right Thru Left App, Total Total i StartTime Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Lett Total Total Peak Hour From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Pealk 1 01 1 Intersection 07:15 AM 0 0 426 782 0 1208 I 71 0 121 1921 2878 Volume 0 1271 207 1478 0 I 0 0.0 1 35.3 64.7 0.0 37.0 0.0 63.0 Percent 0.0 86.0 14.0 0.0 0.0 99 225 0 3241 19 0 31 501 806 07:45 0 362 50 432 0 0 0 01 0.893 Volume Peak Factor High Int. 07:45 AM 6:45:00 AM 07:45 AM 225 0 07:30 AM 25 0 31 Volume 0 382 50 432 0 0.855 1 0 0 0 99 0.93232 9 0 857 Peak Factor Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 ( Intersection 05:00 PM 1 0 0 p 354 747 0 11011 123 0 136 2591 2992 Volume 0 1050 582 1632 0 0.0 0. 0 D.0 32.2 67.8 0.0 1 47.5 0.0 52.5 ,, Percent 0.0 64.3 35.7 1 193 0 276) 29 0 36 671 782 05:15 0 292 147 439 0 0 0 0I 83 0.957 Volume Peak FadorI :4 j 05:45 PM 105:30 PM 1 High int. 05:15 PM 0 0 0 p 189 0 2901 46 0 51 971 0.66811 Volume 0 292 147 4391 0.949 ; Peak Factor 0.9291 MIA <<ACCUTEK >> « 21114 TRIGGER LANE >> << DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765» (909)595-6199 FAX: (909) 595-6022 > File Name :311702 Site Code : 00311702 Start Date :06118/2002 Pape No : 1 08:00 AM 0 242 50 292 1150 75 190 55 211 0 266 0 0 0 08:15 AM 0� 7qg 0 214 36 250 90 0 77 167 71 237 0 308 0 0 0 0 725 08:30 AM 0 194 28 222 1040 63 167 63 232 0 295 0 0 0 0 684 08:45 AM 0 198 32 230 115 0 61 176 44 168 0 212 0 0 0 0 618 Total 0 848 146 994 424 0 276 700 233 848 0 1081 0 0 0 0 2775 *** BREAK *** 1.0-: 00 PM 0 264 13 277 102 0 64 166 39 211 0 2501 0 0 0 0 693 =4:15 PM 0 313 24 337 115 0 72 187 48 229 0 277 0 0 0 0 I 801 6-:30 PM 0 291 16 307 124 0 56 180 41 208 0 249 0 0 0 0 736 F1= 45 PM 0 284 15 299 133 0 71 204 35 215 0 250 0 0 0 0 753 Total 0 1152 68 1220 474 0 263 737 163 863 0 1026 0 0 0 0 2983 0;:00 PM 0 287 15 302 112 0 83 195 28 233 0 261 0 0 0 0 758 0 :15 PM 0 299 16 315 141 0 97 238 42 235 0 277 0 0 0 0 830 G.5:30 PM 0 317 11 328 149 0 97 246 42 238 0 280 0 0 0 0 854 O5:45 PM _ 0 293 14 307 153 0 73 226 45 243 0 288 0 D 0 0 821 Total 0 1196 56 1252 555 0 350 905 157 949 0 1106 0 0 0 0 3263 Grand Total 0 4479 719 51981 1741 0 1184 29251 841 3323 0 41641 0 0 0 01 12287 APPrch % 0.0 86.2 13.8 59.5 0.0 40.5 20.2 79.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total "/o 0,0 36.5 5.9 42.3 14.2 0.0 9.6 23.8 6.8 27.0 0.0 33.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Start Time Right Thru I Left I TottPa� Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left Tpei Right Thru Left APP PeaK Hour From 07:00 AM to 06:45 AM Peak 1 of 1 DIAMOND AR BLVD, Southbound -�uunn SR -6 WB RAMPS Westbound movemenr DIAMOND BAR BLVD. Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Tta� Right Thru Left T� Right Thru Left APP' Right Thru Left APP• Int. Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1597 1.0 1.0 1.0 676 1.0 1.0 1.0 Total 1.0 1.0 1.0 Total Total 07:00 AM 0 300 127 427 38 0 59 97 70 122 0 192 0 0 0 ume D 329 ume 99 07:15 AM 0 295 124 419 65 0 45 110 76 135 0 211 0 0 0 0 716 07:30 AM 0 359 99 458 83 0 89 172 74 180 0 254 0 0 07:45 AM 0i 740 07:45 AM 0 329 99 428 102 0 102 204 6B 226 0 294 0 D 0 0 D 0 884 Total 0 1283 449 1732 286 0 295 583 288 663 0 951 0 n n n I 926 llgc 08:00 AM 0 242 50 292 1150 75 190 55 211 0 266 0 0 0 08:15 AM 0� 7qg 0 214 36 250 90 0 77 167 71 237 0 308 0 0 0 0 725 08:30 AM 0 194 28 222 1040 63 167 63 232 0 295 0 0 0 0 684 08:45 AM 0 198 32 230 115 0 61 176 44 168 0 212 0 0 0 0 618 Total 0 848 146 994 424 0 276 700 233 848 0 1081 0 0 0 0 2775 *** BREAK *** 1.0-: 00 PM 0 264 13 277 102 0 64 166 39 211 0 2501 0 0 0 0 693 =4:15 PM 0 313 24 337 115 0 72 187 48 229 0 277 0 0 0 0 I 801 6-:30 PM 0 291 16 307 124 0 56 180 41 208 0 249 0 0 0 0 736 F1= 45 PM 0 284 15 299 133 0 71 204 35 215 0 250 0 0 0 0 753 Total 0 1152 68 1220 474 0 263 737 163 863 0 1026 0 0 0 0 2983 0;:00 PM 0 287 15 302 112 0 83 195 28 233 0 261 0 0 0 0 758 0 :15 PM 0 299 16 315 141 0 97 238 42 235 0 277 0 0 0 0 830 G.5:30 PM 0 317 11 328 149 0 97 246 42 238 0 280 0 0 0 0 854 O5:45 PM _ 0 293 14 307 153 0 73 226 45 243 0 288 0 D 0 0 821 Total 0 1196 56 1252 555 0 350 905 157 949 0 1106 0 0 0 0 3263 Grand Total 0 4479 719 51981 1741 0 1184 29251 841 3323 0 41641 0 0 0 01 12287 APPrch % 0.0 86.2 13.8 59.5 0.0 40.5 20.2 79.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total "/o 0,0 36.5 5.9 42.3 14.2 0.0 9.6 23.8 6.8 27.0 0.0 33.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Start Time Right Thru I Left I TottPa� Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left Tpei Right Thru Left APP PeaK Hour From 07:00 AM to 06:45 AM Peak 1 of 1 I T°tali Owl i interSaction 07:15 AM Vr.;iume 0 1225 372 1597 I 365 0 311 676 273 752 0 1025 0 0 0 0 i 3298 cent 0.0 76.7 23.3 54.0 0.0 46.0 26.6 73,4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ume D 329 ume 99 4281 102 0 102 204 68 226 0 294 0 0 0 0 926 Punk F-;3ctor � hi; Int. 07:30 AM' -Imme 07:45 AM 07:45 AM 6:45:00 AM 0.890 ; I `, 0 359 99 458 ' 102 0 102 204 68 226 0 294 Peak 7Lctor 0.872 0.828 0.872 1 'leak He ur From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 inters -^,-tion 05:00 PM Volume 0 1196 56 12521 555 0 350 905 157 949 0 1106 0 0 0 0i 3263 P.:rcent 0.0 95.5 4.5 61.3 0.0 38.7 14.2 85.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 flme 0 317 Volume 11 328 149 0 97 246 42 238 0 280' 0 0 0 DI 654 Peak Factor High Int. 05:30 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM 10.955 i Volume 0 317 11 328 149 0 97 246 45 243 0 288 Peak Factor 0.954 0.920 0.960 E N G I N E E R S APPENDIX B INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) AND HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL (HCM) CALCULATION WORKSHEETS w t k --- �'i.c o 0 0 0 o 0 0 o r> e Q U O � m o. wu �o.o ooas .r.y m oo aoo ooP c So o c¢ OZ c y� Po o Oa W'.J dw g,9� 00o r m � •-- r �y:: .•: Pio OSP yo 9� 0 0 0 P P Ory O yEy K � .j� oP o o P Yuu. U W�. 000 go 000 W. Y C $[ C m N � _ r� s SoSR<a '>z oo PP Oa oa oPo gn = m W '44 oao N a�iv t r.y otic, o ro a -oo w $ a m x m`L378' t7 iv '"Er zv qc� oPo No oNo .-No o m4�� 6N> NU�NO N 000 n m � •-•- D t� b'C Nd mo � Y. mNYn ov �3eYa '-e°1 wu9w " o� t 83 jhy 13.3 so x <ii ^ = C Y 9.it it .� 000 00o aoo 00 y0>� ao 15, $.'; ,Y 6 orvry o0 ono N.- •'�. f" aLLLD o00 ooa oaa o00 N y 3 0 U S o00 oao � V W; rv- rv^ -No .- a O w KU ¢ U O w « ?� € So Sf R Iso. 000 00 0 `.o.^u _ w-„ z - $S $$o aM7.5 a.- 2 Uq F. Ci m a z2i "� zwnu 8 gga .m: -�� zzz' in my w'ww 333 "'; ua �i chi ci 13.3 §K( § k ; { Z§ ij E M §2§ M ! 7 / ! ]2£ ) { §k \ !« | E 4z.G )�� \/2 §§§ )§• ) §§) k §j - kk/ »� ... ,_. \ r 4 � )\ ))) \ §© 6z \.j / k ƒ d� \ ■j )}� �� 66 K' ! q ... ... ... .,� (� Jƒ �� # ! ;ƒ! K' (� # ! k 6 c .66 „ § aQ / }] }}) \2 � V \/) k 6.09 f. iE !.�- $Na ° ddo do 0 ooa �,h7 000 b a do 000 o gumN a g � �acei o+ eG $Z "gip O O O O G ona ogo ooa .p V t�. Uc 8 aoo tee•- aF. N!a ma m- YF S9E o00 000 oro d 3'3 a" Sod o0 it 8o cryo gmo c oary K to}� a d a yU 'R e e N W O o 0 0 ^ o^ VgsE > 0 0 0 0 o d V�usoos. ¢ VU � 00 o U� rn k�2s2:9 E'd i? -9 nnn u`iiiiw n33 ° cf� uci i l•IJ EPA" 000s in Iso6 6 000 w n VY o00 v A EPA" 000s in Iso6 6 n v A I . I I . I 000 I I I .. EPA" 000s in Iso6 6 n EPA" 000s in n a 8 a ON U"!!1 C -. b 2!6 ir s g2 EPA" E §® f \ 0'|r )) Jk/ OF $!t 2 ƒ) §) \§ (/ ) ! � � } !■;! p ry i.1::a o oryo 'ry [[ � ,?:;8 od o00 0o eo 1d: do ^gig $Mo $ap 0o m �.v � 000 000 000 000 _ ci z0 0T �gg ­ME opo 'o - r ,+ um 0 dNvmoo�1 ma $0oo0rrvo �.p O0�0m0 Omvmmn dLaQU�N �TFS�V�N 0o00 .000 000 000 �� 0 R o� opo 000 oc opo' e� K U WT '� N .i .Elj �i y � ' o '•`'� � z � opp o0 op � h `r JCC ZWQW i z' z' NNn WWW �� UJ Y=UV 11Y 2£� )J§ v e r ..C' q # � ! �| :� k \� ,g ^ } \� [\f : ¥| \k) \ .. §- ( § ! (�! 66 6615 66 _ B ) a.i I «/ƒ 39m ) m . r ..C' q # � ! �| 00O Rog A v_qq oo b 7'.6 P o 0 0 0 a 00 00 • 000 0o a? m 000 Pim � u� c � �u o N e 000 5 o� o So T ea o i 5. P o 0 0 o a ger v c p P IS UVB NN ii ono<^ N3od 00 00 • 000 0o io. m pe4 000 Pim o N e 000 5 o� o So T ea o i 5. P o 0 0 o a U t5 inmm www IW a 8v Elm Opp 89, 000 pppg 6 821 - - - a 6 821 - - - - - - - No lo, 1E - - - O . . . . . . . . . . i2 .2 a - - - - No 1E - - - - - i2 .2 �q i2 22 Z. .2Z 31 ENGINEERS & PLANNERS ■ TRAFFIC, TRANSPORTATION, PARKING » ol Aj )\( ) �\/lz 2' �f � 2 k : f zi ..a a 2 . . » ol Aj )\( ) �\/lz 2' �f G) : f zi a 2 ` � 7 / / «r� - ,/ c4 / \ le Em » ol )\( : f - ,/ c4 / \ le Em 222 «#A !qm «©« $q§ F=4\ » ol zm� m � m o on.¢ aN N O N "U'� aCc Oa 6 oO "To' oG V ry ry 2 ' v o OmaF.7� m F P.a.;� mOo 000 omo 000 y�f a ::R me ^mM a ^ 000 a`N 0 1/ -2-6) �K 1 o .,moo , •-� r � oao O � m W' V Z '. c� w � --rvo orvo 000 f, m a o,P,� 000 oao 000 000 'I 1/ -2-6) �K oom Oo Op O .bmm O � Z '. c� w � --rvo orvo 000 m wU E v n i w� jU qq o0o aL d ry � � d w< mE�� ya oN^ {No ono 000 �Ew 3wF2ZZ zg, uJNN W W _ =a 1/ -2-6) I HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: CHN Agency/Co.: LLG Engineers Date Performed: 6/25/02 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: No. 1 Jurisdiction: 2366\hcs\lam-ex. Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2002 Project ID: Existing Traffic Conditions East/West Street: Sunset Crossing Road North/South Street: SR -57 SB Ramps _ Worksheet 2 - Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics I Eastbound ( Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T 1 R I L T R I L I T R I L T R Volume 119 173 I I i 0 10 96 60 ID 0 0 1856 0 187 o Thrus Left Lane 50 50 Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Ll L2 Ll L2 L1 L2 Ll L2 Configuration LT T T TR L R PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow Rate 105 87 48 108 856 187 Heavy Veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 No. Lanes 2 2 Opposing -Lanes 2 2 Conflicting -lanes 2 2 Geometry group 5 5 1 Duration, 1.00 hrs. Worksheet 5 - Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Ll L2 Ll L2 Ll L2 Flow Rate 105 87 48 108 Service Time 4.7 4.6 4.7 4.4 Utilization, x 0.20 • 0.17 0.05 0.20 Dep. headway, hd 6.98 6.95 7.02 6.68 Capacity 355 337 298 358 Delay 11.47 11.05 10.45 11.06 LOS B B B B Approach: Delay 11.26 10.87 LOS B B Intersection Delay 276.53 "Intersection LOS F %1 1 2 0 2 1 Southbound L1 L2 856 187 3.2 2.4 1.23 0.23 5.16 4.36 856 437 442.97 B.64 F A 365.10 F HCS20O0: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: CHN Agency/Co.: LLG Engineers Date Performed: 6/25/02 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: No. 1 Jurisdiction: 2366\hcs\lpm-ex Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2002 Project ID: Existing Traffic Conditions East/West Street: Sunset Crossing Road North/South Street: SR -57 SB Ramps Worksheet 2 - Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R ( L T R I L I I T R I L T R ( Volume (20 146 0 10 177 137 10 0 0 i 1727 0 99 % Thrus Left Lane 50 50 I Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Ll L2 Ll L2 L1 L2 Ll L2 Configuration LT T T TR PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L 1.00 R 1.00 Flow Rate 93 73 88 226 727 94 % Heavy Veh 0 0 0 0 No. Lanes 2 2 0 0 Opposing -Lanes 2 2 2 Conflicting -lanes 2 2 0 Geometry group 5 5 1 2 Duration, T 1.00 hrs. 1 _. _Worksheet 5 - Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound. Southbound Ll L2 Ll L2 L1 L2 Ll L2 Flow Rate 93 73 88 226 727 94 Service Time 4.9 4.9 4.6 4.2 3.5 2.7 Utilization, x 0.19 0.15 0.17 0.41 Dep. headway, hd 7.22 7.18 6.92 6.55 1.11 0.12 Capacity 343 323 338 476 5.50 4.70 Delay 11.58 11.10 11.02 13.79 727 344 251.80 8.36 LOS B B B B Approach: E A Delay 11.37 13.02 223.93 LOS B B Intersection Delay 145.90 Intersection LOS F F [3• 22 RCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a m T;-23 0 ALL -.WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: CHN Agency/Co.: LLG Engineers Date Performed:- 6/25/02 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: No. 1 Jurisdiction: 2366\hcs\lam-cum Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2004 Project ID: East/West Street: Sunset Crossing Road North/South Street: SR -57 SB Ramps Worksheet 2 - Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R L T R Volume120 180 0 10 100 62 10 0 D 1690 -0194 I % Thrus Left Lane 50 50 Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 Ll L2 Ll L2 L1 L2 Configuration LT T T TR PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L 1.00 R 1.00 Flow Rate 110 90 50 112 890 194 % Heave Veh 0 0 0 0 No. Lanes 2 2 0 0 Opposing -Lanes 2 2 2 Conflicting -lanes 2 ? 0 Geometry; group 5 2 Duration, T 1.00 hrs. 1 _ Worksheet 5 - Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 Ll L2 Ll L2 Flow Rate 110 90 50 112 Service Time 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.4 890 194 Utilization, x 0.21 0.17 0.10 0.21 3.2 2.4 Dep. headway, hd 7.00 6.97 7.05 6.71 1.29 0.24 Capacitv 360 340 300 362 5.20 4.40 Delay 11.61 11.13 10.51 11.17 890 444 LOS B B B 549.86 8.77 Approach: B F A Dela 11.39 10.97 LOSB B 448.92 Intersection Delay 339.34 Intersection LOS F F m T;-23 0 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) 'ANALYSIS Analyst: CHN Agency/Co.: LLG Engineers Date Performed: 6/25/02 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: No. 1 Jurisdiction: 2366\hcs\lam-cum2 Units: U_ S. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 Project ID: East/West Street: Sunset Crossing Road North/South Street: SR -57 SB Ramps Worksheet 2 - Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics I Eastbound I Westbound 1 Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I I Volume 122 201 0 0 Ill 70 10 0 0 1993 0 217 1 Thrus Left Lane 50 50 /► Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Ll L2 Ll L2 Ll L2 L1 L2 Configuration LT T T TR L R PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00, 1.00 Flow Rate 122 101 55 126 993 217 Heavy Veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 No. Lanes 2 2 2 Opposing -Lanes 2 2 0 Conflicting -lanes 2 2 2 Geometry group 5 5 1 Duration, T 1.00 hrs. Worksheet 5 - Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 Ll L2 L1 L2 Flow Rate 122 101 55 126 993 217 Service Time 4.8 4.7 4.8 4.5 3.3 2.5 Utilization, x 0.24 0.20 0.11 0.24 1.47 0.27 Dep. headway, hd 7.07 7.03 7.12 6.78 5.32 4.52 Capacity 372 351 305 376 993 467 Delay 11.99 11.45 10.68 11.58 866.05 9.21 LOS B B B B F A Approach: Delay 11.75 11.31 712.38 LOS B B F Intersection Delay 536.96 Intersection LOS F /► HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a -Worksheet 5 - Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Ll L2 Li L2 L1 L2 Flow Rate 123 101 56 126 Service Time 4.8 4.7 4.8 4.5 Utilization, x 0.24 0.20 0.11 0.24 Dep. headway, hd 7.07 7.03 7.12 6.78 Capacity 373 351 306 376 Delay 12.02 11.46 10.71 11.58 LOS B B P B Approach: Delay 11.76 LOS B Intersection Delay 537.94 Southbound Ll L2 993 217 3.3 2.5 1.47 0.27 5.33 4.53 993 467 868.70 9.22 F A 11.31. 714.56 6 F Intersection LOS F 'x-25 ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: CHN Agency/Co.: LLG Engineers Date Performed: 6/25/02 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: No. 1 Jurisdiction: 2366\hcs\lam-tot2 Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 Project ID: 2010 Total Project Traffic East/West Street: Sunset Crossing Road North/South Street: SR -57 SS Ramps Worksheet 2 - Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics i Eastbound Westbound ) Northbound I Southbound L I T R I L T R I 1 L T R I L T R 1 I Volume 122 202 0 10 112 70 10 I I 0 0 1993 0 217 o Thrus Left Lane 50 50 Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Ll L2 L1 L2 Ll L2 L1 L2 Configuration LT T T TR PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L R 1.00 1.00 Flow Rate 123 101 56 126 993 217 % Heavy Veh 0 0 0 0 0 No. Lanes 2 2 0 Opposing -Lanes 2 2 2 Conflicting -lanes 2 2 0 Geometry group 5 5 2 Duration, T 1.00 hrs. 1 -Worksheet 5 - Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Ll L2 Li L2 L1 L2 Flow Rate 123 101 56 126 Service Time 4.8 4.7 4.8 4.5 Utilization, x 0.24 0.20 0.11 0.24 Dep. headway, hd 7.07 7.03 7.12 6.78 Capacity 373 351 306 376 Delay 12.02 11.46 10.71 11.58 LOS B B P B Approach: Delay 11.76 LOS B Intersection Delay 537.94 Southbound Ll L2 993 217 3.3 2.5 1.47 0.27 5.33 4.53 993 467 868.70 9.22 F A 11.31. 714.56 6 F Intersection LOS F 'x-25 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: CHN Agency/Co.: LLG Engineers Date Performed: 6/25/02 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: No. 1 Jurisdiction: 2366\hcs\lam-tot Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2004 Project ID: 2004 Total Project Traffic East/West Street: Sunset Crossing Road North/South Street: SR -57 SB Ramps Worksheet 2 - Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics 1 Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R 1 L T R I L T R I L T R I I Volume 120 181 0 10 101 62 IO 1 I 199 I 0 0 1890 0 y Thrus Left Lane 50 50 Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Ll L2 Ll L2 L1 L2 Ll L2 Configuration LT T T TR L R PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow Rate 110 91 50 113 890 194 `s Heavy Veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 No. Lanes 2 2 2 Opposing -Lanes 2 2 0 Conflicting -lanes 2 2 2 Geometry group 5 5 1 Duration, T 1.00 hrs. Worksheet 5 - Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 Ll L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow Rate 110 91 50 113 890 194 Service Time 9.7 4.7 4.7 4.4 3.2 2.4 Utilization, x 0.21 0.18 0.10 0.21 1.29 0.24 Dep. headway, hd 7.01 6.97 7.05 6.71 5.21 4.41 Capacity 360 341 300 363 890 444 Dclay 11.61 11.16 10.51 11.20 547.37 8.78 LOS B B B B F A Approach: Delay 11.41 10.99 450.98 LOS B B F Intersection Delay 340.43 Intersection LOS F 8�21P HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: CHN Agency/Cc.: LLG Engineers Date Performed: 6/25/02 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: No. 1 Jurisdiction: 2366\hcs\fpm-cum Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2004 Project ID: 2004 Background Traffic East/West Street: Sunset Crossing Road North/South Street: SR -57 SB Ramps Worksheet 2 -, Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics I Eastbound Westbound Northbound I Southbound jL T R L T R I L T R I L T R I Volume 121 152 0 10 184 142 - 1 E Thrus Left Lane 10 0 0 1756 0 98 50 SO Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 Ll L2 Ll L2 L1 L2 Configuration LT T T TR PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L R Flow Rate 97 7692 239 1.00 1.00 $ Heavy Veh 0 0 p 756 98 p No. Lanes 2 0 0 2 2 Opposing -Lanes 2 2 Conflicting -lanes 0 2 2 Geometry group 5 2 5 Duration, 'P 1.00 hrs. 1 Worksheet 5 - Capacity and Level of Service Z� Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Ll L2 Ll L2 L1 L2 Ll L2 Flow Rate 97 76 92 234 Service Time 4.9 4.9 9 6 4.3 756 98 Utilization, x 0.20 0.15 0.18 0.43 3.5 2.7 Dep. headway, hd 7.25 7.21 6.94 6.57 1.16 0.13 Capacity 347 326 342 484 5.55 4.75 Delay 11.71 11.20 11.13 14.13 756 348 LOS B BB 340.21 8.45 Approach: g F A Delay 11.48 13.28 LOS g B 302.14 Intersection Delay 195.38 Intersection LOS F F Z� HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: CHN Agency/Co.: LLG Engineers Date Performed: 6/25/02 Analysis Time Period: PH Peak Hour Intersection: No. 1 Jurisdiction: 2366\hcs\lpm-cum2 Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 Project ID: 2010 Background Traffic East/West Street: Sunset Crossing Road North/South Street: SR -57 SB Ramps Worksheet 2' - Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L I T R L T R L T R I L T R 1 volume 123 169 I I I I 0 10 205 159 10 0 0 1843 0 109 1 Thrus Left Lane 50 50 Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 Ll L2 L1 L2 Configuration LT T T TR L R PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow Rate 107 85 102 262 843 109 % Heavy Veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 No. Lanes 2 2 2 Opposing -Lanes 2 2 0 Conflicting-lanes1 2 2 Geometry group 5 5 1 Duration, T 1.00 hrs. Worksheet 5 - Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Ll L2 Ll L2 L1 L2 Ll L2 Flow Rate 107 85 102 262 843 109 Service Time 5.0 5.0 4.7 4.3 3.7 2.9 Utilization, x 0.22 0.17 0.20 0.48 1.33 0.15 Dep. headway, hd 7.33 7.25 6.99 6.62 5.69 4.89 Capacity 357 335 352 512 843 359 Delay 12.07 11.50 11.42 15.44 630.17 8.74 LOS B B B C F A Approach: Dela_V 11.82 14.31 559.02 LOS B B F Intersection Delay 357.87 Intersection LOS F M HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: CHN Agency/Co.: LLG Engineers Date Performed: 6/25/02 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: No. 1 Jurisdiction: 2366\hcs\lpm-tot Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2004 Project ID: 2004 Total Project Traffic East/West Street: Sunset Crossing Road North/South Street: SR -57 SFS Ramps Worksheet 2.- Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R L T R 1 1 I I Volume 121 153 0 10 185 142 10 0 D 1756 0 98 `s Thrus Left Lane 50 50 Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound LI L2 Ll L2 Ll L2 L1 L2 Configuration LT T T TR L R PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flow Rate1.00 1.00 97 77 92 235 `o Heavy Veh 0 0 0 0 756 98 No. Lanes 22 0 0 Opposing -Lanes Z 2 Conflicting -lanes 20 Geometry group 2 2 Duration, T 1.00 hrs. ' 1 Worksheet 5 - Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 LI. L2 Ll L2 Ll L2 Flow Rate 97 77 92 235 Service Time756 5.0 4.9 4.6 4.3 98 Utilization, x 0.20 0.15 0.1B 0.43 3.6 2.8 Dep. headway, hd 7.25 7.21 6.94 6,57 1.17 0.1.3 Capacity 347 327 342 4B5 5.55 4.75 Delay 11.71 11.22 11.13 14.18 756 348 LOS g B B 342.17 8.46 Approach: B F A Delay 11.49 13.32 LOS g B 303.88 Intersection Delay 196.21 Intersection LOS F E' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS br.alys'CHN I, -,,z j LLG Engineers -__ 6/25/02 Period: PM Peak Hour I,-, ' e r 5 No. 1 J,-, r i sd I 2366\hcs\lpm-tot2 r1r.its: Customary 1nalys, 7 Y.-ar: 2010 Pr,,jec, �: 2010 Total Project Traffic ::meet: Sunset Crossing Road Street: SR -57 SB Ramps W;rksheet 2 - Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics I Eastbound Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I I L T R Volume ITT 170 0 0 206-159 10 0-0 f�43 0-109 Lane Thrus 50 50 Eastbound Westbound Northbound . Southbound Ll L2 LI L2 Ll L2 LI L2 Configuration LT T T TR PHIF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L R Flow Rate 108 85 103 262 1.00 1.00 % Heavy Veh 0 0 0 0 843 109 No. Lanes 2 2 0 0 Opposing -Lanes 2 2 2 Conflicting -lanes 2 2 0 Geometry 'Jf0up 5 5 2 Duration, T 1.00 hrs. I ---Worksheet 5 Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Ll L2 Ll L2 Ll L2 Ll L2 Flow 108 85 103 262 .Servic<. Timf= 5.0 5.0 4 .74.3 843 109 Urilizatij"ri, x 0-22 0.17 0.20 0.48 3.7 2.9 Dr -p. headw,iy, hd 7.33 7.29 7.00 6.62 1.33 0.15 Capacity 358 335 353 512 5.70 4.90 Delay 12.10 11.51 11.44 15.45 843 359 LOS B B632.08 8.75 Approach: F A Delay 11.84 ]9 32 LOS B B 560.71 Intersection Delay 358.48 Intersection LOS F F t N U I N E E R S APPENDIX C TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT WORKSHEETS I 7:71 I M L uo uo 70M ----------- .......... ^ i Z� LL li Z 0. LU (n 101 2' � E2 p• t d 4 z O w J w CO w a z O F= ¢ LU J w F— CO LU O i Agenda Item 7.1 Site plan found in project file — 23425 Sunset Crossing Road, Diamond Bar, CA BACKGROUND: The property owner, Karambir Bhullar, and applicant, S & W Development, are requesting approval to remodel and add approximately 6,446 square feet two story with basement to an existing 3,392 square feet legal nonconforming one story single-family residence with a total five - car garage, site retaining walls with a maximum exposed height of seven (7) feet, and swimming pool. A Tree Permit is required for the, removal and replacement of two walnut trees. The project's address is 2601 Wagon Train Lane (Lot 49 of Tract No. 30578), Diamond Bar, California, within the gated community identified as The Country Estates. The parcel is .87 gross acres. A Restricted Use Area is at the rear of the property, however the proposed habitable structure is not within this area. The lot is pie shape and slopes downward from Wagon Train Lane to the rear of the property. 1 City of Diamond Bar PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: REPORT DATE: January 23, 2003 MEETING DATE: January 28, 2003 CASE/FILE NUMBER: Development Review No. 2002-25, Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2002-16, and Tree Permit No. 2003-01 APPLICATION REQUEST: A request to remodel and add approximately 6,446 square feet with a two story and basement to an existing 3,392 square feet legal nonconforming one story single-family residence with a total five -car garage, site retaining walls with a maximum exposed height of seven (7) feet, and swimming pool. A Tree Permit is required for the removal and replacement of two walnut trees. PROPERTY LOCATION: 2601 Wagon Train Lane (Lot 49 of Tract No. 30578) PROPERTY OWNER: Karambir Bhullar, 314 N. San Dimas Avenue, San Dimas, CA 91773 APPLICANT: S & W Development, 20272 Carrey Road, Walnut, CA 91789 BACKGROUND: The property owner, Karambir Bhullar, and applicant, S & W Development, are requesting approval to remodel and add approximately 6,446 square feet two story with basement to an existing 3,392 square feet legal nonconforming one story single-family residence with a total five - car garage, site retaining walls with a maximum exposed height of seven (7) feet, and swimming pool. A Tree Permit is required for the, removal and replacement of two walnut trees. The project's address is 2601 Wagon Train Lane (Lot 49 of Tract No. 30578), Diamond Bar, California, within the gated community identified as The Country Estates. The parcel is .87 gross acres. A Restricted Use Area is at the rear of the property, however the proposed habitable structure is not within this area. The lot is pie shape and slopes downward from Wagon Train Lane to the rear of the property. 1 The project site is zoned R-1-20,000 for single-family residence. Its General Plan Land Use designation is Rural Residential (RR) 1/du/acre. The subject site is surrounded by the R-1-20,000 Zone. REVIEW AUTHORITY/APPLICATIONS • Development Review Per the City's Development Code, Section 22.48.020.A(1), projects involving a building permit for reconstruction and additions to structures that are equal to 50 percent or greater of the floor area of the existing structures on the site requires Development Review. The Planning Commission is the hearing body for Development Review. The purpose of this review process is to establish consistency with the General Plan through the promotion of high aesthetic and functional standards to complement and add to the economic, physical, and social character of the City. The process will also ensure that new development and intensification of existing development yields a pleasant living, working, or shopping environment and attracts the interest of residents, workers, shoppers and visitors as the result of consistent exemplary design. • Legal Nonconforming Status -Minor Conditional Use Permit The existing parcel was approved by Tract Map No. 30578, Lot 49, on April 23, 1969 as .87 acres. The existing structure was approved using the Los Angeles County Code and met the required setbacks of that Code prior to the City's incorporation. The setback requirement for the Los Angeles County Code was: • Front 20 feet • Sides 5 feet on one side, 10 feet on the other • Rear 15 feet • Height Average Finish Grade no more than 35 feet The current Diamond Bar Development Code requires setbacks of: • Front 30 feet • Sides 10 feet on one side, 15 feet on the other • Rear 25 feet • Height shall not exceed 35' from the natural or finish grade at any exterior wall of the structure to the highest point of the roofline The setback standards have changed from the Los Angeles County Code. In this case the front setbacks do not meet the standards set forth in Diamond Bar's Development Code. Therefore, this application is considered a nonconforming parcel/structure. These are defined as any parcel or structure that was legally created or constructed prior to the adoption of the current Diamond Bar Development Code adopted November 3, 1998, and which does not conform to current Code provisions/standards prescribed for the zoning district in which the use is located. The addition, enlargement, extension, reconstruction, relocation or structural alteration of a nonconforming structure may be allowed with Minor Conditional Use Permit approval, in compliance with Chapter 22.56. The Planning Director or his designee may approve proposed projects of less than 50% providing that the additions or improvements are less than 50% of the existing square footage, the site coverage is no more than 30 percent, that the project conforms to applicable provisions of the Development Code, and the exterior limits of new construction do not exceed the applicable height limit or encroach further into the setbacks than the comparable portions of the existing structure where the nonconformity exists. In this case the nonconformity is in the front. This proposed project conforms to applicable provisions of the Development Code, the site coverage is less than 30 percent, and it meets the required height limitations and does not encroach further into the setbacks than the existing structure in the front. However, the proposed project is more than 50 percent of the existing square footage. Therefore a public hearing by the Hearing Officer and approval of a Minor Conditional Use Permit and findings are required. Tree Permit The Application requests removal and replacement of existing of preserved/protected trees per Development Code Section 22.38. o Planning Commission Authority Pursuant to Development Code Section 22.48.030, the highest level of authority shall make concurrent processing; therefore, the Planning Commission shall hear both applications. ANALYSIS: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW/MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Development Standards The following is a comparison of the City's development standards and the project's proposed development standards: I . Setbacks (main structure): • Front yard -30' from property line • Side Yards -10'& 15' minimum from property line • Rear yard -25' minimum from property line • Site Coverage -overall maximum 30% 2. Building Height: Maximum 35' 3. Parkino- rroject's uevelopment Standards 1. Setbacks (main structure): • Front yard- 20'8 from property line to existing wall of new garage* • Side yards- 137' and 167' from property line • Rear yard -meets requirement • Site CoveranA_AnnmvimInto6, ono/ 3. Parking:** Minimum two -car garage with each bay • Existing two -car plus additional three -car minimum 10'x20' garage and driveway Accessory Structures - Pool 5 feet from PL to waterline Retaininq wall maximum hei ht 7 feet 4. Accessory 5tructures- Pool 5 feet from PL to waterline Retainin wall maxi h * Front setback is legal nonconforming and requires a Minor Conditional Use Permit with Findings of Fact. ** There are a total of five designated bedrooms plus two additional rooms/areas that could convert to bedrooms. Staff anticipates the five -car garages plus driveway adequate parking. Architectural Features and Colors The proposed project's architectural design and palette are compatible with the eclectic architectural style of other homes within The Country Estates, and are consistent with the City's General Plan, Development Code, and Design Guidelines. Per the architect, the proposed project's architectural style is a Mediterranean design. The project's architectural features include the a two-story foyer with single story porch with columns and second story decorative windows, decks, balconies, and patios with wrought iron balustrade, and layering of materials and finishes via multi-levels of roof lines of multicolored Zorro Blend tile, stucco, and Ledgestone accents to add texture and contrast. The applicant has received the approval of The Country Estates Homeowners Association Architectural Committee. • Floor Plans The proposed single-family structure consists of two -stories and basement. The first -story includes the two-story open foyer, living room, dining room, kitchen with nook and pantry, family room with bar, two guest bedrooms with bath, prayer room with bath and walk -in -closet, library, laundry room, two powder rooms, deck, and the five -car garages. The second story includes storage above garage; the master bedroom with bath, walk in closet, deck; exercise room; retreat area; and two bedroom suites with bath, walk in closet and one with sitting room and deck. The basement includes a large game room with sitting area, powder room, media room with bath, and storage. 4 • Covenant and Agreement to Maintain a Single-family Residence A condition of approval has been added that the owner complete and record a "Covenant and Agreement to Maintain a Single-family Residence" on a form to be provided by the City. The covenant must be completed and recorded with the Los Angeles County's Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of a building permit. SITE WORK Grading/Retaining Walls A grading and retaining wall permit is required for this project. The application has been designed in accordance with the development standards for the R-1-20,000 zone and the City's Hillside Management Ordinance so that the structure conforms to the natural topography and natural grade by using the appropriate techniques including split level foundations, stem walls, stacking and clustering. The seven (7) foot retaining wall at the rear of the property extends the pad. Seven feet is the maximum allowed by the Development Code without a special approval process. A condition of approval has been added to heavily landscape this area to mask the wall height. The Planning staff will review and approve the revised landscape plan. Covenant and Agreement for Restricted Use Area Habitable structures are not allowed in the Restricted Use Area. However, pools, spas, tennis courts, etc. may be constructed in the Restricted Use Area provided they meet design criteria as set forth by the Public Works Division. A Covenant and Agreement to construct in a Restricted Use Area shall be recorded and returned to the City prior to the issuance of any grading or retaining wall permits. PRESERVED/PROTECTED TREES This project has protected/preserved trees that will be removed to allow for the construction. An aborist report by Knapp and Associates is attached. The report indicates that most of the Walnut Trees on site are poor specimens and are thereby exempt from protection/preservation per Development Code Section 22.38.060. Per the report's diagram, tree 1 and tree 7 should be replaced. Preservation of these trees would compromise the property owner's reasonable use and enjoyment of his property. Pursuant to the Development Code, replacement for these trees is at a 3:1 ratio or a total of six trees. The placement and species of the new trees is not noted on the submitted landscape plan. A revised landscape plan shall show six 36" box trees of the native variety from preserved species list: Sycamore, Arroyo Willow, Oak, or Walnut. LANDSCAPING A final landscape/irrigation plan shall be submitted with the type of planting materials, color, size, quantity and location including proposed sites for the planting of protected/preserved trees and additional species to mask the height of the rear seven (7) foot retaining wall. The Planning Division will review this revised plan. The landscaping/irrigation shall be installed or replaced prior to the Planning Division's final inspection or Certificate of Occupancy issuance. Any walls, gates, fountains, etc. that may be proposed within the front setback shall not encroach into street's dedicated easement or exceed a maximum 42 inches in height. VIEW IMPACT The terrain in the vicinity of Wagon Train Lane is hilly. The parcels generally follow the ridgeline (higher elevations) and slope from the street downward (lower elevations) at the rear of the lots. Lot 49 has easements and restrictions, however the subject habitable structures are not within these areas. The neighboring parcels are single-family residences. By maintaining the height limits of the Development Code, the remodel will not impact neighboring properties. ADDITIONAL REVIEW The Public Works Division and the Building and Safety Division reviewed this project. Their comments are included in both the report and the conditions of approval. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: On January 15, 2003, property owners within a 500 -foot radius of the project site were notified by mail. On January 17, 2003, notification of the public hearing for this project was made in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and Inland Vail Dailv Bulletin newspapers; and a notice of public hearing on a display board was posted at the site and displayed for at least 10 days before the public hearing; as well as three other posted within the vicinity of the application. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City has determined that the proposed project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to the guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA), Section 15301(e). RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review No. 2002-25, Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2002-16, and Tree Permit No. 2003-01, Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval, as listed within the attached resolution. REQUIRED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FINDINGS: 1. The design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, development standards of the applicable district, design guidelines, and architectural criteria for specialized area (e.g., theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards, or planned developments); 2. The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future development, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards; 3. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the characteristics of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain and enhance the harmonious orderly and attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22.48, the General Plan, City Design Guidelines, or any applicable specific plan; 4. The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public; as well as, its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, and color that will remain aesthetically appealing; 5. The proposed project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious (e.g., negative affect on property values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 6. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). REQUIRED NONCONFROMING STRUCTURES FINDINGS: The addition, enlargement, extension, reconstruction, relocation or structural alteration of the nonconforming structure would not result in the structure becoming: 1. Incompatible with other structures in the neighborhood; 2. Inconsistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan; 3. A restriction to the eventual/future compliance with the applicable regulations of this Development Code; 4. Detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of persons residing in the neighborhood; 5. Detrimental and/or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood. REQUIRED MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PEMIT FINDINGS: 1. The proposed use is allowed within the subject zoning district with the approval of a Minor conditional Use Permit and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Development Code and the Municipal Code; 2. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan; 3. The design, location, size and operating characteristics of the proposed use are compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity; 4. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of use being proposed including access, provisions of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and the absence of physical constraints; 7 5. Granting the Minor Conditional Use Permit will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, - safety, convenience or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property or improvements in the vicinity and zoning districts in which the property is located, and; 6. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). REQUIRED TREE PERMIT FINDING: 1. Preservation of the tree is not feasible and would compromise the property owner's reasonable use and enjoyment of property or surrounding land and appropriate mitigation measures will be implemented in compliance with Section 22.38.130 (Tree Replacement/Relocation Standards). Prepared by: Linda Kay Smith, Development Services Assistant ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Resolution of Approval; 2. Applications; 3. Arborist Report; 4. Exhibit "A" - site plan, floor plan, elevations, landscape plan, and materials/color's board, dated January 28, 2003. f3 Draft Attachment "1" PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2003 -XX A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 2002-25, MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2002-16, TREE PERMIT NO. 2003-01 AND CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION 15301(e), A REQUEST TO REMODEL AND ADD APPROXIMATELY 6,446 SQUARE FEET TWO STORY WITH BASEMENT TO AN EXISTING 3,392 SQUARE FEET LEGAL NONCONFORMING ONE STORY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH A TOTAL FIVE -CAR GARAGE, SITE RETAINING WALLS WITH A MAXIMUM EXPOSED HEIGHT OF SEVEN (7) FEET, AND SWIMMING POOL. ATREE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF TWO WALNUT TREES. THE PROJECT SITE IS LOCATED AT 2601 WAGON TRAIN LANE (LOT 49 OF TRACT NO. 30578), DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA. A. Recitals 1. The property owner, Karambir Bhullar, and applicant, S & W Development have filed an application to approve Development Review No. 2002-25, Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2002-16, and Tree Permit No. 2003-01, for a property located at 2601 Wagon Train Lane, Diamond Bar, Los Angeles County, California and part of the gated development identified as The Country Estates, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review and Categorical Exemption shall be referred to as the "Application." 2. On January 15, 2003, property owners within a 500 -foot radius of the project site were notified by mail. On January 17, 2003, notification of the public hearing for this project was made in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers; and a notice of public hearing on a display board was posted at the site and displayed for at least 10 days before the public hearing; as well as three other posted within the vicinity of the application. 3. On January 28, 2003, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Application. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: 1. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. Draft Attachment "1" The Planning Commission hereby determines that the project identified above in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA) and guidelines promulgated thereunder. This is pursuant to Section 15301(e) of Article 19 of Chapter 3, Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds and determines that, having considered the record as a whole including the findings set forth below, and changes and alterations which have been incorporated into and conditioned upon the proposed project set forth in the application, there is no evidence before this Planning Commission that the project proposed herein will have the potential of an adverse effect on wild life resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Based upon substantial evidence, this Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effects contained in Section 753.5 (d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth herein, this Planning Commission, hereby finds as follows: (a) The project relates to a parcel at 2601 Wagon Train Lane (Lot 49 of Tract No. 30578), Diamond Bar, CA, within the gated community identified as The Country Estates. The project site is approximately .87 gross. A Restricted Use Area is at the rear of the property, however the proposed habitable structure is not within this area. The lot is pie shaped and slopes downward from Wagon Train Lane to the rear of the property. (b) The General Plan Land Use designation is Rural Residential (RR), 1 du/acre. The project site is zoned Single -Family Residence, R-1- 20,000. (c) The subject site is surrounded by the R-1-20,000 Zone. (d) The application is a request to remodel and add approximately 6,446 square feet two story with basement to an existing 3,392 square feet legal nonconforming one story single-family residence with a total five - car garage, site retaining walls with a maximum exposed height of seven (7) feet, and swimming pool. A Tree Permit is required for the removal and replacement of two walnut trees. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (e) The design and layout of the proposed development are consistent with the General Plan, development standards of the applicable 2 Draft Attachment "1" district, design guidelines, and architectural criteria for specialized area (e.g., theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards, or planned developments. The project site, currently developed with a single-family residence, was established before the adoption of the City's General Plan and current Development Code. The adopted General Plan of July 25, 1995 has a land use designation of Rural Residential (1 du/acre). The current application has been designed in accordance with the development standards for the R-1-20,000 Zone and the City's Hillside Management Ordinance, it complies with the City's General Plan objectives and strategies related to maintaining the integrity of residential neighborhoods and open space, the current Diamond Bar Development Code, and the City's Design Guidelines. There is no specific plan. The existing structure was built using the Development Standards of the Los Angeles County Code prior to the City's incorporation and is considered a legal nonconforming structure. Per the current Development Code, the Planning Director or his designee may approve proposed projects providing that the additions or improvements are less than 50% of the existing square footage, the site coverage is no more than 30 percent, that the project conforms to applicable provisions of the Development Code, and the exterior limits of new construction do not exceed the applicable height limit or encroach further into the setbacks than the comparable portions of the existing structure where the nonconformity exists. In this case the nonconformity is in the front. The proposed project conforms to applicable provisions of the Development Code, the site coverage is less than 30 percent and is comparable with the existing neighborhood, and it meets the required height limitations and does not encroach further into the setbacks than the existing structure in the front or side. Though the proposed project is more than 50 percent of the existing square footage, a concurrent application has been made with findings below for the approval of a Minor Conditional Use Permit. The terrain in the vicinity of Wagon Train Lane is hilly. The proposed two-story application is not considered an impact to the view corridor of surrounding properties. (f) The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future development, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. Draft Attachment "1" Shadow Canyon Drive, Steeplechase Lane, and Wagon Train Lane adequately serve the project site. These streets are designed to handle minimum traffic created by residential development. The project site is currently developed with a single-family residence. The proposed reconstruction/remodeling does not change the existing use of a single-family residence. Although the proposed addition enlarges the existing residence, and is a two-story structure, it meets the 35 feet height limitation per the Development Code. The structure is not expected to unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future development with regard to view or traffic. (g) The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the characteristics of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain and enhance the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22.48, the General Plan, City Design Guidelines, or any applicable specific plan. The proposed project's design is compatible with the eclectic architectural style of other homes within The Country Estates and is consistent with the City's Design Guidelines and Development Code. Per the architect, the proposed project's architectural style is a Mediterranean design. The project's architectural features include the use of two-story foyer with single story porch with columns and second story decorative windows, decks, balconies, and patios with wrought iron balustrade, and layering of materials and finishes via multi-levels of roof lines with multicolored Zorro Blend tile, stucco, and Ledgestone accents to add texture and contrast. Additionally, the colors and materials utilized are compatible with the homes within the surrounding area. The applicant has obtained the approval of the architectural committee of The Country Estates. (h) The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public, as well as its neighbors, through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, and color that will remain aesthetically appealing. A project colors/materials board is provided. The colors, materials, and textures proposed are complimentary to the existing homes within the area while offering variety and low levels of maintenance. (i) The proposed project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious (e.g., negative affect on property values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or 4 Draft Attachment "1" improvements in the vicinity. City permits, inspections and soils reports are required for construction and will ensure that the finished project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Additionally, a Covenant and Agreement is required and runs with the land to maintain a single-family residence. The addition of square footage to the main structure follows the line of the existing structure in the front, and maintains a 35 feet height; therefore, the proposed application has no negative affect or impact to the view corridor of surrounding properties. (j) The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The environmental evaluation shows that the proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to the guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA), Sections 15301(e). NONCONFORMING STRUCTURES (k) The addition, enlargement, extension, reconstruction, relocation or structural alteration of the nonconforming structure would not result in the structure becoming incompatible with other structures in the neighborhood. As stated in Item (g), the proposed project is compatible with other structures in the vicinity. Many structures in the vicinity have remodeled and added the second -story and increased square footage. (1) The addition, enlargement, extension, reconstruction, relocation or structural alteration of the nonconforming structure would not result in the structure becoming inconsistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan. As stated in items (e) and (g), the proposed project is consistent with the City's General Plan objectives and strategies, Chapter 22.48 of the Development Code, and City Design Guidelines. (m) The addition, enlargement, extension, reconstruction, relocation or structural alteration of the nonconforming structure would not result in the structure becoming a restriction to the eventual/future compliance with the applicable regulations of this Development Code. Draft Attachment "1" The existing parcel was approved by Tract Map No. 30578, Lot 49, on April 23, 9969 as .87 acres. The existing structure was completed under the Los Angeles County Code and met the required setbacks of that Code prior to the City's incorporation. The current Diamond Bar Development Code requires minimum lot size as 9 du/acre in Rural Residential Zone (RR). The front setback for this zone has changed from the Los Angeles County Code of 20 feet to 30 feet. The application is considered a nonconforming parcel and structure. These are defined as any parcel or structure that was legally created or constructed prior to the adoption of the current Diamond Bar Development Code adopted November 3, 9998, and which does not conform to current Code provisions/standards prescribed for the zoning district in which the use is located. The proposed project conforms to the other applicable provisions of this Development Code and the exterior limits of the new construction do not exceed the applicable height limit or encroach further into the setbacks than the comparable portions of the existing structure in the front where the nonconformity exists. No further nonconforming status of this parcel is anticipated. (n) The addition, enlargement, extension, reconstruction, relocation or structural alteration of the nonconforming structure would not result in the structure becoming detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of persons residing in the neighborhood. City permits, inspections and soils reports are required for construction and will ensure that the finished project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Additionally, a Covenant and Agreement is required and runs with the land to maintain a single-family residence. (o) The addition, enlargement, extension, reconstruction, relocation or structural alteration of the nonconforming structure would not result in the structure becoming detrimental and/or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood. As stated in items (e -h), the architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the characteristics of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22.48, the General Plan, City Design Guidelines, or any applicable specific plan. Also, as stated in Item (i), City permits, inspections and soils reports are required for construction and will ensure that the finished project Draft Attachment "l " will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (p) The proposed use is allowed within the subject -zoning district with the approval of a Minor Conditional Use Permit and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Development Code and the Municipal Code. As state in Items (e -o), the proposed use is allowed within the zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of the Development Code and Municipal Code. (q) The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan. As state in Item (e), the proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any there is not applicable specific plan. (r) The design, location, size and operating characteristics of the proposed use are compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity. As stated in items (e -o), the design, location, size, etc. is compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity. (s) The subject site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of use being proposed including access, provisions of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and the absence of physical constraints. As stated in Items (e -o), the subject site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of use being proposed including access, provisions of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and the absence of physical constraints. (t) Granting the Minor Conditional Use Permit will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to person, property or improvements in the vicinity and zoning districts in which the property is located. City permits, inspections and soils reports are required for construction and will ensure that the finished project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Additionally, 7 Draft Attachment " 1 " a Covenant and Agreement is required and runs with the land to maintain a single-family residence. The addition of square footage to the main structure follows the line of the existing structure in the front, and maintains a 35 feet height; therefore, the proposed application has no negative affect or impact to the view corridor of surrounding properties. Additionally, the colors and materials utilized are compatible with the homes within the surrounding area. The applicant has obtained the approval of the architectural committee of The Country Estates. (u) The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The environmental evaluation shows that the proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to the guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act of 9970 (CEQA), Sections 15301(e). TREE PERMIT (v) Preservation of the existing walnut trees is not feasible and would compromise the property owner's reasonable use and enjoyment of Property. Surrounding land and appropriate mitigation measures will be implemented in compliance with Section 22.38.130. The applicant has submitted that development requires the removal of two walnut trees. A 3:1 replacement shall be required pursuant to the Development Code. Many homes within The Country Estates have remodeled and requested Tree Permits. Therefore, preservation of these trees would compromise the property owner's reasonable use and enjoyment of his property. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusion set forth above, the Planning Commission hereby approves this Application subject to the following conditions: (a) The project shall substantially conform to site plan, floor plans, elevations, and materials/colors board collectively labeled as Exhibit "A" dated January 28, 2003, as submitted and as amended herein. (b) The subject site shall be maintained in a condition that is free of debris both during and after the construction, addition, or implementation of the entitlement granted herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether during or subsequent to construction, shall be done only by the property owner, applicant or 8 Draft Attachment "l " by duly permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste from residential, commercial, construction, and industrial areas within the City. It shall be the applicant's obligation to insure that the waste contractor utilized has obtained permits from the City of Diamond Bar to provide such services. PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING (c) Applicant shall submit a soils report if required for the proposed improvements to be reviewed and approved by the City. (d) Applicant shall follow special requirements as required by the City Engineer for construction in a Restricted Use Area. No portion of the habitable structure shall be located in the Restricted Use Area and a Covenant and Agreement to construct in a Restricted Use Area shall be recorded and returned to the City prior to the issuance of any grading or retaining wall permits. (e) A grading and retaining wall plan shall be required. In accordance with the City's grading requirements, the grading plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City before the issuance of a grading permit. On a grading plan the following shall be delineated: 1. Protected/Preserved species of trees and fencing requirements. 2. Cut and fill quantities and earthwork calculations and export location; 2. All flow lines, finished surfaces, and finished grades; 3. Proper drainage with detailed sketches, surface water shall drain away from the building at a 2% minimum slope; 4. Proposed and existing grades; 5. Sign/stamped by a civil engineer, geotechnical engineer and geologist; 6. Clearly delineate all easements (i.e. Flood Hazard Area, Restricted Use Area and Recreation Easements); 7. Retaining walls shall not be constructed of wood or wood products; 8. Retaining walls shall be required to be ornamental by using stucco or decorative block; 9. Engineered calculations shall be submitted with retaining walls (APWA Standard is not applicable); 10. Indicate retaining wall locations on grading plan with standard detail and delineate: (a) Top of wall; (b) Top of footing; (c) Finish Surface; (d) Structural calculations; and Draft Attachment "1" (e) Retaining walls exposed height shall not exceed six feet; 11. All grading shall be subject to Development Code Sections 22.16.030 (Air Emissions) and Section 22.28 (Noise); 12. Hydrology calculations showing capacity of proposed drainage devices as well as existing drainage structures on site shall be reviewed and approved by Public Works Division; 13. Railings atop retaining walls holding a fill shall not exceed a maximum height of 42 inches. (f) If applicable, the applicant shall comply with Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan requirements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. (g) Before the issuance of any City permits, erosion control plans shall be submitted to the Public Works Division for the City's review and approval. Measures shall be in place for construction started after September 15, through April 15. The erosion control plan shall conform to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards and incorporate the appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP's). Additionally, the Applicant shall obtain the necessary NPDES permits. (h) Drainage pattern shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Division; surface water shall drain away from the building at a 2% minimum slope. BUILDING AND SAFETY (i) The Applicant shall provide temporary sanitation facilities while under construction. G) A permit for demolition shall be obtained from the South Coast Air Quality Management District. (k) Applicant shall submit an application to the Walnut Valley Water District as necessary, and submit their approval to the Building and Safety Division prior to the issuance of building permits. (1) The single-family structure shall meet the 2001 California Building Codes. (m) This single-family structure shall meet the State Energy Conservation Standards. (n) The minimum design wind pressure shall be 80 miles per hour and "C" exposure. 10 PLANNING Draft Attachment 1" (o) Smoke detectors shall be provided in all sleeping rooms. (p) Prior to the issuance of any construction permits, the applicant shall submit construction plans to the Los Angeles County Fire Department for review and approval. (q) Due to the site's topography, applicant shall comply with special design requirements as specified in the California Building Code, Section 18.4.3, building setback, top and toe of slopes. (r) The Applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Department; City Planning, Building and Safety, and Public Works Divisions. (s) A total of six 36 -inch box replacement trees shall be planted on site for the replacement of two walnut trees of good health being removed. The six replacement trees shall be of ' the native variety from preserved species list: Sycamore, Arroyo Willow, Oak, or Walnut. (t) A final landscape/irrigation plan shall be submitted with the type of planting materials, color, size, quantity and location including proposed sites for the planting of protected/preserved trees and additional species to mask the height of the rear seven (7) foot retaining wall. The landscaping/irrigation shall be installed or replaced prior to the Planning Division's final inspection or Certificate of Occupancy issuance. Any walls, gates, fountains, etc. that may be proposed within the front setback shall not encroach into street's dedicated easement or exceed a maximum 42 inches in height. (u) Maximum height of the structure shall not exceed 35 feet from the finish grade at any exterior wall of the structure to the highest point of the roofline. Evidence of compliance with this requirement may require a height survey at completion of framing. (v) The single-family residence shall not be utilized in a manner that creates adverse effects upon the neighborhood and environmental setting of the residential site to levels of dust, glare/light, noise, odor, traffic, or other disturbances to the existing residential neighborhood and shall not result in significantly adverse effects on public services and resources. The single-family residence shall not be used for commercial/institutional purposes, or otherwise used as a separate dwelling. The property shall not be used for regular gatherings which 11 Draft Attachment "1" result in a nuisance or which create traffic and parking problems in the neighborhood. (w) The owner shall complete and record a "Covenant and Agreement to Maintain a Single-family Residence" on a form to be provided by the City. The covenant must be completed and recorded with the Los Angeles County's Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of a building permit. (x) This grant is valid for two (2) years and shall be exercised (i.e. construction) within that period or this grant shall expire. A one -(1) year extension may be approved when submitted to the City in writing at least 60 days prior to the expiration date. The Planning Commission will consider the extension request at a duly noticed public hearing in accordance with Chapter 22.72 of the City of Diamond Bar Development Code. (y) This grant shall not be effective for any purpose until the permittee and owner of the property involved (if other than the permittee) have filed, within fifteen (15) days of approval of this grant, at the City of Diamond Bar Community and Development Services Department, their affidavit stating that they are aware and agree to accept all the conditions of this grant. Further, this grant shall not be effective until the permittee pays remaining City processing fees. (z) If the Department of Fish and Game determines that Fish and Game Code Section 711.4 applies to the approval of this project, then the applicant shall remit to the City, within five days of this grant's approval, a cashier's check of $25.00 for a documentary handling fee in connection with Fish and Game Code requirements. Furthermore, if this project is not exempt from a filing fee imposed because the project has more than a deminimis impact on fish and wildlife, the applicant shall also pay to the Department of Fish and Game any such fee and any fine which the Department determines to be owed. The Planning Commission shall: (a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and (b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail to Karambir Bhullar, 314 N. San Dimas Avenue, San Dimas, CA 91773 and S & W Development (Simon Shum and Rodel Urmatan), 20272 Carrey Road, Walnut, CA 91789. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28th DAY OF JANUARY 2003, BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. 12 Draft Attachment "1" By: Joe Ruzicka, Chairman I, James DeStefano, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of January 2003, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: James DeStefano, Secretary 13 'GJI TT t COASUNI7VMEVELOPAIENT DEPARTAMN'r _ 21660 E. Copley Drive Suite I90 (909)396-5676 FaI (909)861-3117 < N- DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION Record Owner Applicant Name 5HULLA4Z., �J2AMR;lZ - jM MM t\1 (Last name first) —_. (Last name &-st) Addrus 31 C(_ N • SbYrJ jDl A'W 120. Ciry_ S'etV 1D►Mt�S� CLi _ LUA2eJl/ T, CA Zip Ph e(''1 sQ9' FPi Deposit 5 Receipt# By k i �_ Date Recd Applicant's Agcnt Ulr_rvi nl Rc;ra P . (las[ name fuse "2Z� Z Cs�y ✓Zo U-(' CJ=a on Phone¢�p� 3�j$=%6'r3-7j (/ NOTE: 1t is the a licaat's respo r g S O 'fD PP responsibility to notify the Community Development Director in writing of any change of the Principals involved during the processing of this case. (Attach a separate sheet, if necessary, including names, addresses, and signatures of corporations.)ventures,embers ofpartaetships, join[ ventures, and directors Consent: 1 certify that I am the owner of thi &e herein described property and permit the applicant to file this request. Signed_ lsecord owners) Date g 2 f S 2 Certification: 1, the undersigned, hereby certify under penalty, ofperjary that the information herein provided is cornet to the best of my knowledge. Print Name tzpr'V7 n, UtZtvt A'i�trJ (Applicant or Agent) Signed" (Appbcant or Agent) Date Q"I Location '2-60 l W.C.,-00N 772A JtJ LN, Pf A1�.toN C-> i3p� (Street address or tract and lot number) Zoning -- IfNM Previous Cases Present Use of Site Use applied for _ L Record Owner till r ur u1AMUNU bAR COMMUNITY AND k)10ko'• ;!_ DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Case # n1 e.uPcz -ih' Planning Division Deposit 5 rz 21825 E. Copley Drive Receipt it �---_ DiamohdBar,.CA917Q5• ABY• �- Phone (909) 396-8676°rax {909)'861-31'17 ' IDate Rec'c ,1 - y,, FOR CITY USE n CONDITIONAL WSE;PEROIT o MINOR CONDITIONAL 1JSE PE14MIT • Applicant Applicant's Agent Name 5hyliar , KpaMlyir S. Shvmr Sinton Urmafan , t2odo (Last name first) (Last name first) (Last name first) Address 2&c,1 maepti IV94) LI cityDianundBim` zip C113GS Phone Fax ( ) t O 2022 Carr>Jy Road Wa! H 41 1191k _ Phone ( Mot 't-99 %Mb Fax �z�� c�arTe�r RAad W3 140il' 611,489 Phone ( ) / Az>cr) Kq8 Soto ems. I!o Fax ( )It, 0i') .Sqg An application fee in accordance'with Section 22.44.040 of the Municipal Code must accompany this Application. The application fee is either a flat fee or a deposit plus payment of the City's processing costs computed on an hourly basis. The applicable fee or deposit amount for this application is indicated above. If it is a deposit, the applicant shall pay any processing costs that exceed the amount of the deposit prior to issuance of the permit; if processing costs are less than the deposit, a refund will be paid. NOTE: It is the applicant's responsibility to notify the City in writing of any change of the principals involved during the processing of this case. (Attach separate sheet, if necessary, including names, addresses, and signatures of members of partnerships, joint ventures, and directors of corporations.) Consent: I certify that I am the owner of the herein -described property and permit the applicant to rile this request. 77 Signed "� bate `y ,2 Q record owne Certification: 1, the undersigned, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information herein provided is correct to the best of my knowledge. Print Name �Zcdea U (Applicant or Agent) Signed ,Wpolicant or Date C{ 1'>.o (6-1 Location of project 21�10 I WA 50PI Tin C r11s (Street addressor Tract ar4lot tnumbgt}, r D _ (� ._ I - . 1 ^ J. i• Zoning 4•-G 1-5 i .;,'li Numberirrg,Map, r; iw Previous;CAses,.".. -;,;. ;•h:. il: ?7 � IFalI1! (INSIDE GOVERNMtN7 GtN I r -K) — DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 FPL ay V 909 396 5676 FAX 909861 3117 r Deposit S A1'irdiCATIOAI ur BRtxe,p By. Date Reed Record Owner Applicant Name A9v44,44, kA) /?Applicant's Agent sr��, sin�ecv !list name fire) v�es9sl Ts3nr. Rao�z (L.aac name fiat) Address .2C.01 l�EC/V 7�j (last name Gtsq __ .2:722 C�J/�i? /�®• ?f92�2 CAIP.t?a�j' /C.t'7. City 1W 1u4,—,VV 7. dial-yvt�� Phom( Phone( NOTE: It is the invo involved during the responsibility notify the Community Development Director in wilting of any change of the Principals involved during the processing of this case, (Attach separate shed, if necessary, including acmes. addresses, and direcmn of corporations.) atgrtawrm of members of Partnmahips I joint venturos, and Consent 1 certify that 1 am the owner of flee herein described property and permit the applicant to ftk this / Sgna (Ard�o Certffcatfon: 1, the undersigned, hereby eertq'fy traderpenally ofper.%ury that the itlformadon heroinProsided ar comet ro the best of my knowledge. Print Name _ ,t2P (Applicant or Agent) Signed i ��— ate (Applicant or Agent) D—.�`7 ' B 'a • O Location (i.e. address or general description of !option and legal d / ®�� sheets as n ) B ascription of property in 9nestion: -lose G 7 C7 evo . 3p 9/V*Z- Lo7//fE C c�Ure+.yavts O��„•�Y of S .r;.vEaEZFr, Srs►7c ec �®.,� /a .7lsr ocGiCC- 4Mf �' mtcc acs111f ®.� -- How tnanY D� trees will be qtr, Tf1L� dOU�tt'ry �4 Ori 7Pi� /® removal, relocated or damaged? 1 C® vtt s a5/. How many rtaIF trees will remain? Will trees to be removal be replacad? location (indicated on site plan) and sch a, ule for plantm If Yes, indicate the proposed size, type 4Z g• w �cc S�®3Ao � II December 2, 2002 Dr. Bhullar 2601 Wagon Train Lane Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Re: Preliminary Arboricultural Report Site: 2601 Wagon Train Lane, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Dear Dr. Bhullar. As per your directive, I inspected the trees at the above referenced site. Their are not__ many wonderful trees. The Walnut trees are remnants of native trees. My recommendations would be to replace most trees due to decline and lack of cultural care. SPECIES LIST Jugians nigra, Black Walnut (bw) Juglans regia, English Walnut (ew) Pyrus kawakawi, Evergreen Pear (ep) TREE INVENTORY Trees are rated on a scale of 1 to 5, trees with a rating of two and below should be replaced; rating scale 1=poor, 5=excellent, and bt=brown trunk for palms. Multi trunk trees have multi trunk inch diameters. Species Trunk Diameter Rating Comments Back yard 1 ew 12,13 3 appears fine, will not live a long time 2 bw 6 2 poor mechanical structure 3 bw 12 2 u 4 bw 12 2 5 bw 2 2 sprouts 6 bw 18,18,18 i sprouts, fallen dead stems 7 bw 12,12,12, 3 near fence line Front yard 8 ep 4 best tree on property itTo 51 B7 GOLDEN AVENUE, RIVERSIDE, CA 92505 • RIVERSIDE 8091680.6043 REDLANDS 909x7934064 FULLERrON 714/447-8811 STATE CONTRACTORS LICENSE N 481325 • FAX 0091668-6378 RECOMMENDATIONS ® My recommendations would be to replace most of the trees. Any tree retained must have at least 12 feet of fenced tree root protection zone, corrective pruning, and wood chip mulching of the soil surface 2601 Wagon Train Lane Diamond Bar, CA 91765" ® The trees biological loss should be mitigated by increasing the container or trunk diameter size of woody trees/shrubs being replaced on site and retaining wood chip mulch from plant demolition to reuse on site. ® Consultant should inspect tree and woody plant installation, relocation, and soil treatments. Please call with your questions or suggestions. Thank you for looking to Knapp Associates for your arboriculture concerns and i know that our knowledge wil I aid in your green investment. ncer Iy�MIh Samuel L. Kni p Registered Co sulting Arborist LOW OPI r -Mf 17a (IMV08 lvlL131vw 31111 1:3HS 59416 VJ '.Iuff paoulula lu-I up.11 uoae.AA (09Z 33N3QIS3Umv-1-lnHI3 -S-M 'SUW R 'Hipi :NOI.LVOO-1 V 3NVN 103ro8d (IZOZ-ASO) 3NOIS29031 NU3H1.nos inN-IVM US 61-d H1013 NVIaNl 'oL snld H2He O Nwnioo Nvosni ISVO-=IUd 0 ZZZ-d OVWON 'oL sn-ld IGHe (3N3113 O2INOZ Lcre '31I1 ONWOON VOW " 31Ha -L.�H{Yd073A3Q,��s- z�d OLIV09 'IVIUB.Lvw X31111 139HS JAAJjL----,, 39LI6 dJ `.+gg puouiulQ 'u l ulu.iZ uoSe.M I09Z 3ON3ais3m mviinN9 •s•)4 •saw '8 •aw NOUVO01 T 3NVN 103f021d tie yi_. IIIIII� WVOj 0030 O 2!004 3E)vmv9 O MOONIM U.NIA 9Q Agenda Item 7.2 Site plan found in project file — Development Review No. 2002-25/Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2002-16/Tree Permit No. 2003-01 - 2601 Wagon Train Ln., Diamond Bar, CA City of Diamond Bar PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: '7 3 REPORT DATE: January 13, 2003 MEETING DATE: January28, 2003 CASE/FILE NUMBER: Development Review No. 2002-35 APPLICATION REQUEST: A request to construct a two story, single family residence of approximately 12,127 gross square feet including balconies, porch, patio, porte- cochere, attached four car garage and a retaining wall with a six foot maximum exposed height. PROPERTY LOCATION: 3079 Windmill Drive (Lot 3, Tract 50314) PROPERTY OWNER: Windmill Estates, LLC 3480 Torrance Blvd. Ste. 300 Torrance, CA 90503 APPLICANT: Richard Gould 3480 Torrance Blvd. Ste. 300 Torrance, CA 90503 BACKGROUND: The property owner, Windmill Estates and applicant, Richard Gould are requesting an approval of Development Review No. 2002-35 pursuant to Code Section 22.48.020. A. Approval of this request will allow the construct of a two-story single-family residence with a four car garage, porte-cochere, balconies, and a patio for a total of approximately 12,127 square feet. Additionally, the request includes a retaining wall with a maximum exposed height of six feet located in the north side yard. The project site is located at 3079 Windmill Drive, Diamond Bar, California. The project site is the vacant Lot 3 of Tract 50314, a 15 -lot subdivision with graded buildable pads approved by the City Council on February 3, 1998. Tract 50314 is adjacent to the Country 1 Estates. The rectangular shaped lot has a flat buildable pad and the balance of the lot slopes downward to the canyon and is part of a slope, drainage and maintenance easement. There is a sewer and 30 feet utility easement at the front of the lot. There are also easements for access and street purposes and an easement for sanitary and sewer purposes. The lot is approximately 1.73 gross acres and the buildable pad area is .48 acres. The pad area will remain the same size except for 10 feet that will be expanded on the north side to meet side yard setback requirements of 15 feet. The property contains protected/preserved trees, located outside of the buildable pad located at the front, north side and the rear downward sloping side of the property. Those trees include California Black Walnuts, Sugar Gums, Mondell Pines, Coast Live Oaks, Scrub Oaks and Mexican Elderberries. The project site has a General Plan land use designation of Rural Residential (RR) Maximum 1 DU/AC and zoning designation of Single Family Residence -Minimum Lot Size 40,000 Square Feet (R-1-40,000). Generally, the following zone surrounds the project site: To the north, south and east is R-1-40,000 and R-1-8,000 to the west. ANALYSIS: Development Review The purpose of Development Review is to establish consistency with the General Plan through the promotion of high aesthetic and functional standards to complement and add to the economic, physical, and social character of the City. In this case, the process will also ensure that the proposed project's development yield a pleasant living environment for the residents and visitors as the result of consistent exemplary design. Pursuant to Development Code Section 22.48.020. A., an application for Development Review is required for residential projects, which involve construction on a vacant parcel and new structures, additions to structures, and reconstruction projects which are equal to 50 percent or greater of the floor area of existing structures on site, or have a minimum 10,000 square feet of combined gross floor area. The proposed residential project is on a vacant lot with a gross floor area of approximately 12,127 square feet; therefore Development Review is required with the Planning Commission as the review authority. The following is a comparison matrix of the development standards set forth by the City's Development Code and the project's proposed development standards. CITY'S DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AS PROPOSED PROJECT'S DEVELOPMENT APPROVED THROUGH TRACT MAP 50314 STANDARDS SETBACKS: SETBACKS: Residence: Residence: • Front yard — 25 ft. from front property line; Front yard — 58 ft.; • Side yard —10 & 15 ft. from the buildable pad's • Side yard —10 & 15 ft from buildable pad's edge; 40' between neighboring structures edge; 57' between neighboring structure • Rear yard — 25ft from buildable pad's edge; Rear yard —58 ft. from buildable pad's edge; BUILDING HEIGHT: BUILDING HEIGHT: • Two stories — maximum 35 ft. from natural or Two stories with a basement — 34 ft from natural finished grade; or finished grade; PARKING: PARKING: • Minimum two car garage (20'x 20' each); Garage — 21.5 ft. X 36.5 ft. = 784 sq. ft. which will provide a minimum of 4 parking stalls; FENCING/WALLS: FENCING/WALLS: • Maximum exposed height within the side and • Maximum exposed height within north west side rear setback — 6 ft; 6 ft. (not within the 30 ft. front yard setback; • Maximum exposed height within the front • Maximum exposed height within the front setback — 42 inches; setback will be conditioned in resolution to not exceed a height of 42 inches; LOT COVERAGE: LOT COVERAGE: Maximum — 30 percent. • 10 percent. The proposed project's development standards are in compliance with the required development standards as specified in the Development Code. Architectural Features and Colors The proposed residence's architectural style, as referred to in the application is Mediterranean. This style is compatible with other residences in `The Country Estates" due to the eclectic architectural style that is existing in this area. Prominent architectural 3 features include front entry with the porte-cochere supported by stylized Corinthian columns and front windows flanked by the stylized columns. A materials/colors board has been submitted which delineates the following: Stucco Colors Merlex — P-624 Oak Tone B base Aluminum Windows White Roof Terracotta Tile — Weathered Terracotta "3532" Fascia TrimMood Sand SP 115-1 Dunn Edwards Columns &Balu:trades White 5P 1 Dunn Edwards The proposed materials/colors board is compatible with other residences within the area. Floor Plan The proposed single-family structure contains two stories. The first floor contains a four car garage, maid's room with adjacent bathroom, storage, service room, dirty kitchen, pantry, breakfast nook, kitchen, family room, living room, bedroom with bathroom and wardrobe, wet bar, powder room, library, foyer, office with bathroom and patio. The second floor contains a master bedroom with sitting area bathroom and walk-in closet, three bedrooms each with a bathroom and two with walk in closets, powder room, mezzanine, wet bar, ballroom and two balconies. A total of 6 bedrooms are proposed with a garage that can park four cars and with the additional driveway and the porte-cochere that can park two cars. Therefore, staff believes that the number of bedrooms in relationship to the number of parking spaces provided will be adequate. Retaining Walls The City's Development Code permits wall/retaining walls with a maximum exposed height of six feet. For this project, the proposed retaining wall will cut into the slope at north side of the property to expand the pad and maintain a setback of 15 feet. The maximum exposed height of the retaining wall will be six feet. The approved City Council Resolution No. 98-08 for Tract Map 50314 requires side yard setbacks to be a minimum of 10 feet and 15 feet from the buildable pad's edge. Landscaping/I rrigation/Trees The Mitigation Monitoring Program outlined in Environmental Impact Report No. 97-1 (SCH No. 96071104) and approved by the City shall be implemented rigorously. Prior to 4 issuance of occupancy permits, all oak and walnut trees and plant species shall be installed according to ratio, locations, and palette mix specified in EIR No. 97-1. Buyer's Awareness A condition of approval for Tract No. 50314 requires the preparation of a "Buyers' Awareness Package". This includes, but is not limited to: 1. Information pertaining to geologic issues regarding the properties; 2. Wildlife corridors; 3. Oak and walnut preservation issues; 4. The existence and constrains pertaining to Significant Ecological Area No. 15 and Tonner Canyon; 5. Explanatory information pertaining to restrictions on use of the properties as necessary; 6. And, similar related matters. A program was instituted to include delivery of a copy of the "Buyers' Awareness Package" to each prospective purchaser. This program incorporated a signed receipt by the prospective purchaser verifying receipt of the Package and that the prospective purchaser read the information within the Package. This program also required that a copy of this receipt be forwarded to the City. To ensure the effectiveness of this program, it will be a condition of approval that the applicant submits to the City a copy of this receipt signed by the prospective buyer before the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. In the event no buyer has purchased the property, then receipt is to be forwarded before approval of future improvements (i.e. hardscapes, pool/spa, retaining walls, additional landscaping.) Additional Review The City's Public Works and Building and Safety Divisions reviewed this project. Their recommendations are within the attached resolution. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) & guidelines promulgated there under, pursuant to Section 15162 (a) of Article 11 of the California Code of Regulations, the City has determined that this project is consistent with the previously certified Environmental Impact Report No. 97-1 for Tract Map No. 50314. Further environmental review is not required. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: Notice for this project was published in the Inland Valley Bulletin and the San Gabriel Valley Tribune on January 17, 2003. Public hearing notices were mailed to approximately 43 property owners within a 700 -foot radius of the project site on January 17, 2003. Furthermore, the project site was posted with a display board and the public notice was posted in three public places on January 17, 2003. . RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review No. 2002- 35, Findings of Fact and conditions of approval as listed within the attached resolution. REQUIRED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FINDINGS: 1. The design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, City Design Guidelines, development standards of the applicable district, and architectural criteria for special areas, (e.g. theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards, or planned developments); 2. The design and layout of the proposed development will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future development, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards; 3. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the characteristics of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain and enhance the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22.48 of the City's Development Code, the General Plan, or any applicable specific plan; 4. The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, and color that will remain aesthetically appealing; 5. The proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious (e.g. negative affect on property values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. 6. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). 9 Prepared by: Lorena Godinez, Planning Intern Attachments: 1. Draft Resolution; 2. Exhibit "A" - site plan, floor plan, elevations, and colors/materials board dated January 28, 2003, 3. Application; 4 Tree Statement. 5. Re -Vegetation plan Com m un ityDevelopmenttLorenaG od in ezlstaffreporls/DR-02-35 7 A. B. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW RESOLUTION NO. 2003 -XX A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 2002-35, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A TWO-STORY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH BALCONIES, PATIO, PORTE COCHERE AND FOUR CAR GARAGE TOTALING TO APPROXIMATELY 12,127 SQUARE FEET AND A SITE RETAINING WALL WITH AN EXPOSED HEIGHT OF SIX FEET. THE PROJECT SITE IS LOCATED AT 3079 WINDMILL DRIVE (LOT 3, TRACT 50314), DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA. RECITALS The property owner, Windmill Estates, LLC, and applicant, Richard Gould, have filed an application for Development Review No. 2002-35, for a property located at 3079 Windmill Drive, Diamond Bar, Los Angeles County, California, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review shall be referred to as the "Application." 2. On January 15, 2003, 43 property owners within a 700 -foot radius of the project site were notified by mail and a notice of public hearing on a display board was posted at the project site and displayed at least 10 days before the public hearing. On January 17, 2003, notification of the public hearing for this project was made in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers. Additionally, three other sites were posted within the vicinity of the application. 3. On January 28, 2003, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted and concluded a duly noticed public hearing on the Application. RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. The Planning Commission hereby determines that the project identified above in this Resolution is consistent with the previously certified Master Environmental Impact Report No. 97-1 for Tract No. 50314 according to the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA) and guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15162(a) of Article 11 of the California Code of Regulations. No further environment review is necessary. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds and determines that, having considered the record as a whole including the findings set forth below, and changes and alterations which have been incorporated into and conditioned upon the proposed project set forth in the application, there is no evidence before the Planning Commission that the project proposed herein will have the potential of an adverse effect on wild life resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Based upon substantial evidence, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effects contained in Section 753.5 (d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth herein, the Planning Commission, hereby finds as follows: (a) The project's situs address is 3079 Windmill Drive Road, Diamond Bar, California. It is the vacant Lot 3 of Tract 50314, a 15 -lot subdivision with graded buildable pads adjacent to the Country Estates approved by the City Council on February 3, 1998. The lot is approximately 1.73 gross acres and the buildable pad area is .48 acres. The pad area will remain the same except for the 10 feet that will be expanded by the proposed retaining wall on the north side to meet side yard setback requirements of 15 feet. The rectangular shaped lot has a flat buildable pad and the balance of the lot slopes downward to the canyon and is part of a slope, drainage and maintenance easement. There is a sewer and 30 feet utility easement at the front of the lot. There are also easements for access and street purposes and an easement for sanitary and sewer purposes. The property contains protected/preserved trees, located outside of the buildable pad at the front, north side and the rear downward sloping side of the property. Those trees include California Black Walnuts, Sugar Gums, Mondell Pines, Coast Live Oaks, Scrub Oaks and Mexican Elderberries. (b) The project site is zoned Single Family Residential -Minimum Lot Size 40,000 Square Feet (R-1-40,000). Its General Plan Land Use designation is Rural Residential (RR), Maximum 1 DU/AC. (c) Generally, the following zones surround the subject site: to the north, south and east is R-1-40,000; and R-1-8,000 to the west. (d) The application is a request to construct a two-story, single-family residence with balconies, patio porte-cochere and four car garage totaling to approximately 12,127square feet and a site retaining wall with a maximum exposed height of six (6) feet. ADMINISTRATIVE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (e) The design and layout of the proposed development are consistent with the General Plan, development standards of the applicable district, design guidelines, and architectural criteria for specialized area (e.g., theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards, or planned developments. The General Plan was adopted on July 25, 1995 and the Final Tract Map No. 50314 was approved on April 18, 2002. The proposed project complies with the Citys General Plan objectives and strategies related to maintaining density, the integrity of residential neighborhoods and open space, and the City's Design Guidelines. The project is consistent with the Tract Map's Development Standards. Furthermore, the proposed project is compatible with the eclectic architectural style and design, materials, and colors of existing homes within the surrounding area. There is no specific or additional community planned development for the site. (f) The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future development will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. Tract Map No. 50314s Master Environmental impact Report No. 97-1, certified by the City, addresses the design and layout of the neighborhood as well as the flow of pedestrian and vehicular traffic. The project site is an undeveloped lot within an approved tract designed for single-family homes. Windmill Drive and access roads in the vicinity, Wagon Train Lane and Steeplechase Lane, adequately serve the project site. These private streets are designed to handle minimum traffic created by residential development. Therefore, the use of a single-family residence will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future development will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. (g) The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the characteristics of the surrounding neighborhood and will 3 maintain and enhance the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22.48, the General Plan, City Design Guidelines, or any applicable specific plan. The projects architectural features include a two story portico%ntry with columns and arch detail which is also used for the window treatment at the garage wing, rear balcony with wrought iron railing; and stucco exterior with stucco details of cornice and window treatments for styling. These features and the varying tile rooflines add texture and contrast. The proposed materials/colors board was compared with previously approved boards in the vicinity. The combinations of off-white, beige and terracotta palette and the building's architecture blend into the overall streetscape nicely. The selected materials and colors are consistent and the style is compatible with the eclectic architectural style of other homes in neighboring Tract 48487,47850 and 50314, and the Country Estates, yet allow variation in the overall palette and textures. Therefore, the proposed project is consistent with and will maintain and enhance the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22.48, the General Plan, City Design Guidelines. There is no applicable specific plan. (h) The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public, as well as its neighbors, through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, and color that will remain aesthetically appealing. As referenced in the above findings, colors, materials, and textures proposed are complimentary to the existing homes within the area while offering variety and low levels of maintenance. Therefore, the proposed project will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public, as well as its neighbors, through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, and color that will remain aesthetically appealing. Additionally, a Covenant and Agreement is required and runs with the land to maintain a single-family residence. (i) The proposed project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious (e.g., negative affect on property values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Structural plan check, City permits, and inspections, soils report and Fire Department approvals, are required for construction. These processes will ensure that the finished project will not be detrimental 4 to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Additionally, the terrain in the vicinity of Windmill Drive is hilly. The subject site is at the middle of the tract and at a lower elevation than its northerly neighbors are. By maintaining the allowed height requirements, the proposed residential structure allows view corridors for the neighboring properties. Therefore, the proposed residence will not be significantly detrimental with respect to view blockage impact. (j) The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The environmental evaluation shows that the proposed project is consistent with the previously certified Master Environmental Impact Report No. 97-1 for Tract Map Nos. 50314 according to the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA) and guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15162(a) of Article 11 of the California Code of Regulation. No further environmental review is necessary. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusion set forth above, the Deputy City Manager hereby approves this Application subject to the following conditions: (a) The project shall substantially conform to site plan, floor plans, elevations, and materials/colors board collectively labeled as Exhibit "A" dated January 28, 2003, as submitted and approved by the Planning Commission, and as amended herein. (b) The subject site shall be maintained in a condition that is free of debris both during and after the construction, addition, or implementation of the entitlement granted herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether during or subsequent to construction, shall be done only by the property owner, applicant or by duly permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste from residential, commercial, construction, and industrial areas within the City. It shall,be the applicant's obligation to insure that the waste contractor utilized has obtained permits from the City of Diamond Bar to provide such services. (c) Before construction begins, the applicant shall install temporary construction fencing pursuant to the Building and Safety Division's requirements along the project site's perimeter. The fence shall remain at the buildable pad to ensure no construction equipment or debris of any kind is placed within the vegetated area until released 5 by the Planning Division and the balance shall remain until the Building Official approves its removal. Sanitation facilities shall be provided during construction. PUBLIC WORKS (d) A grading plan review and approval is required for cut/fill quantities greater than 50 cubic yards, otherwise a fine grade/drainage plan shall be filed with the City's Public Works Division. (e) The Public Works Division shall review retaining walls: (1) Retaining walls shall not be constructed of wood or wood products; (2) Retaining walls shall be required to be ornamental by using stucco or decorative block; (3) Engineered calculations shall be submitted with retaining walls; (4) Indicate retaining wall locations on grading plan with standard detail and delineate: (a) Top of wall; (b) Top of footing; (c) Finish Surface; (d) Structural calculations; and (5) Retaining walls exposed height shall not exceed six feet. (f) Before the issuance of any City permits, erosion control plans shall be submitted for the City's review and approval. Measures shall be in place for construction started after September 15, through April 15. The erosion control plan shall conform to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards and incorporate the appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP's). Additionally, the Applicant shall obtain the necessary NPDES permits. (g) If applicable, the applicant shall comply with Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan requirements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. (h) Drainage pattern shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Division; surface water shall drain away from the building at a 2% minimum slope. (i) Driveway slope shall be shown on plans. BUILDING AND SAFETY 0) Ballroom floor shall be designed to meet building code. PLANNING (k) Any future pool and spa or tennis court shall require separate permits (1) The single-family structure shall meet the 2001 California Codes: Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, and the 2001 National Electrical Code requirements. (m) The minimum design wind pressure shall be 80 miles per hour and "C" exposure. (n) The single-family structure is located in "Fire Zone 4" and shall meet the following requirements of that fire zone: (1) All roof covering shall be "Fire Retardant, Class A"; the roofs shall be fire stopped at the eaves to preclude entry of the flame or members under the fire; (2) All unenclosed under -floor areas shall be constructed as exterior walls; (3) All openings into the attic, floor, and/or other enclosed areas shall be covered with corrosion -resistant wire mesh not less than 1/a inch nor more than 1/2 inch in any dimension except where such openings are equipped with sash or door; (4) Chimneys shall have spark arresters of maximum 1/2 inch screen. (o) This single-family structure shall meet the State Energy Conservation Standards. (p) Smoke detectors shall be provided in all sleeping rooms. (q) Prior to the issuance of any construction permits, the applicant shall submit construction plans to the Los Angeles County Fire Department for review and approval. (r) Prior to final inspection or Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall submit to the Planning Division written evidence indicating the buyer's receipt of the "Buyers' Awareness Package". In the event no buyer has purchased the property, then receipt shall be forwarded before approval of future improvements (i.e., hardscape, pool/spa, walls, landscaping, etc.) (s) Applicant shall make application to the Walnut Valley Water District as necessary, and submit their approval to the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 1►J (t) Within sixty days of the Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall be required to submit a landscape/irrigation plan for the City's review and approval. The plan shall reflect the guidelines set forth by Tract 50314 and delineate the type of planting materials, color, size, quantity and location. Landscape and irrigation shall be installed within six (6) months of the Certificate of Occupancy issuance. (u) Applicant shall submit a detailed driveway design including pattern, color, and landscaping for Planning Division review and approval. (v) Applicant shall comply with Planning and Zoning; Building and Safety Division; and Public Works Division; and the application shall be approved by the Fire Department. (w) The single-family residence shall not be utilized in a manner that creates adverse effects upon the neighborhood and environmental setting of the residential site to levels of dust, glare/light, noise, odor, traffic, or other disturbances to the existing residential neighborhood and shall not result in significantly adverse effects on public services and resources. The single-family residence shall not be used for commercial/institutional purposes, or otherwise used as a separate dwelling. The property shall not be used for regular gatherings which result in a nuisance or which create traffic and parking problems in the neighborhood. (x) The owner shall complete and record a "Covenant and Agreement to Maintain a Single Family Residence" on a form to be provided by the City. The covenant must be completed and recorded with the Los Angeles County's Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of a building permit. (y) This grant is valid for two (2) years and shall be exercised (i.e., construction) within that period or this grant shall expire. A one - (1) year extension may be approved when submitted to the City in writing at least 60 days prior to the expiration date. The Deputy City Manager will consider the extension request at a duly noticed public hearing in accordance with Chapter 22.72 of the City of Diamond Bar Development Code. (z) This grant shall not be effective for any purpose until the permittee and owner of the property involved (if other than the permittee) have filed, within fifteen (15) days of approval of this grant, at the City of Diamond Bar Community and Development Services Department, their affidavit stating that they are aware and agree to accept all the conditions of this grant. Further, this grant shall not be effective until the permittee pays remaining City processing fees. The Planning Commission shall. (a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and (b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail to Windmill Estates, LLC, owners, and applicant, Richard Gould, at 3480 Torrance Boulevard, #300, Torrance, CA 90503. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28th DAY OF JANUARY 2003, BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, BY: Joe Ruzicka, Chairman I, James DeStefano, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of January 2003, by the following vote: ATTEST: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: James DeStefano, Secretary 9 Record Owner CITY OF DIAMOND BAR COMMUNITY AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT/Planning Division 21825 E. Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Phone(909)396-5676 Fax(909)861-3117 D ADMINISTRATIVE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW D DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION Applicant Name Windmill Estates, LLC Richard Gould (Last name first) (Last name first) Address 3480 Torrance Blvd. Ste. 300 same as owner City Torrance Zip _ 90503 Phone( )_310-540-3 90 Phone 310-540-3990 Phone( Fax( )_ 310-316-7133 Fax( ) Fax( C• 2 — —7 Case # 17 12 0 2 -3 5 Deposit S 2000.00 Receipt # By (Date Rec'd FOR CITY USE Applicant's Agent (Last name first) An application fee in accordance with Section 22.44.040 of the Municipal Code must accompany this Application. The application fee is either a flat fee or a deposit plus payment of the City's processing costs computed on an hourly basis. The applicable fee or deposit amount for this application is indicated above. If it is a deposit, the applicant shall pay any processing costs that exceed the amount of the deposit prior to issuance of the permit; if processing costs are less than the deposit, a refund will be paid. NOTE: it is the applicant's responsibility to notify the City in writing of any change of the principals involved during the processing of this case. (Attach separate sheet, if necessary, including names, addresses, and signatures of members of partnerships, joint ventures, and directors of corporations.) Consent of Owners: t certify that I am the owner of the herein -described property and permit the applicant to file this request. Print Name Gree Delgado, President (All record own/ers) Gr Delgado, President Signed /, (All re down Date Certification of Appli ant: 1, the undersigned, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information herein provided is correct to the best of my knowledge. Print N� Signed Locatioi Zoning Ri-20,000 House Numbering Map/aerial Previous Cases Present Use of Site vacant Use applied for New Single Family Residence w/ attached garage CITY OF DIAMOND BAR Lot 3 Tract 50314 3079 Windmill Drive Diamond Bar, Ca Site Coverage Calculation: First Floor 4976 sq. feet Garage 786 sq. feet Accessory. structures 864 sq. feet (as described below) Additional Footprint sq. feet Total square feet 6626 sq. feet Total square feet (from above) Lot area square feet = ----,29— percent (shall not exceed 40%) 74,361 sq.}t. Effective Jan. 2002 Site Coverage. The percentage of total site area occupied by structures. Structures/building coverage includes the primary structure, all accessory structures (e.g., chimneys, balconies, decks above the first floor, porches, stairs, etc. Structures/building coverage is measured from exterior wall to exterior wall. i---------1 Revised 5102 Zoning Clearance /Plot Plan Application 8 Milding — cm.gc 'aving - UVCIa6C TREE PRESERVATION STATEMENT [ J The subject property contains no oak, walnut, sycamore, willow, or naturalized California Pepper trees. SCJ The subject Properly contains one or more oak, walnut, sycamore, willow, or naturalized California Pepper trees. The applicant anticipates that no activity (grading and/or construction) will take place within five (5) 'feet of the outer tree. ee. ne of any oak, walnut, sycamore, willow, or naturalized California Pepper [ J The subject Property contains one or more oats, walnut, sycamore, willow, or naturalized California Pepper trees. The applicant states that activity (grading and/or construction) Will take place within five (S) feet or the outer dripline of any oak, walnut, sycamore, willow, or naturalized California Pepper tree. A Tree Permit has been or will be applied for prior to any activity taking place on the property. (Applicant's i ature) D: WORD-tSNDAIFORMnTRFF SIATEArIaTr Dti (D tc) 'Q` - S ASA TREE MATERIAL LIST NO SIZE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME TI 15 GAL EUCALYPTUS CLADOGALYX SUGAR GUM T2 5 GAL JUGLANS CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA SLACK WALNUT T3 24- BOX PINUS ELDARICA MONDELL PINE Ta 2a' BOX PLATANUS RACEMOSA (MULTI) CALIFORNIA SYCAMORE TS 15 GAL QUERCUS AGRIFOUA COAST LIVE OAK TS 2'BOX QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA COAST UVEOAK T� - 36 -BOX QUERCUS AGRIFOU4 COAST LIVE OAK T6 15 GAL QUERCUS DUMOSA SCRUB OAK T7 15 GAL SAMBUCUS MEXICANA MEXICAN ELDERBERRY Te 5 GAL SAUX LASIOLEFIS ARROYO WILLOW VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMIVIISSION AGENDA ITEM * SUBJECT: TO: Planning Commission Secretary DATE: FROM:.�% / ► a ✓/� ��. 5 ADDRESS:lP ORGANIZATION: SUBJECT: / i✓ TeC 0-wtt1Des I would like to address the Planning Commission on the above stated item. Please have the Commission Minutes reflect my name and address as printed above. Signature NOTE: • All persons may attend meetings and address the Planning Commission. This form is intended to assist the Chairman in ensuring that all persons wishing to address the Commission will have the opportunity and to ensure correct spelling of names in the Minutes. VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION 0 AGENDA ITEM * SUBJECT: TO: Planning Commission Secretary DATE: FROM:tCo ADDRESS:' t �'�-2rh• C�- r'�in„7'v�� ORGANIZATION: �5 2l; (ter e�� (gin , 4_ ,�- SUBJECT: I would like to address the Planning Commission on the above stated item. Please have the Commission Minutes reflect my name and address as printed above. Signature NOTE: • All persons may attend meetings and address the Planning Commission. This form is intended to assist the Chairman in ensuring that all persons wishing to address the Commission will have the opportunity and to ensure correct spelling of names in the Minutes. VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING CONBRSSIOn AGENDA ITEM * ly SUBJECT:O � �ti-a-t" '0�-, J TO: Pla'mng Commission Secretary DATE:. �� 3 FROM: k&ffly (V' 72—t)64 ADDRESS: ORGANIZATION:`C/�% SUBJECT: I would like to address the Planning Commission on the above stated item. Please have the Commission Minutes reflect my name and address as printed above. SignatLdd NOTE: All persons may attend meetings and address the Planning Commission. This form is intended to assist the Chairman in ensuring that all persons wishing to address the Commission will have the opportunity and to ensure correct spelling of names in the Minutes. VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS TEE PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM * ' k SU TO: Planning Commission Secretary FROM: �T ADDRESS: /'>0 ORGANIZATION: ( != SUBJECT: I would like to address the Planning Commission on the above stated item. Please have the Commission Minutes reflect my name and address as printed above. i Signature NOTE: All persons may attend meetings and address the Planning Commission. This form is intended to assist the Chairman in ensuring that all persons wishing to address the Commission will have the opportunity and to ensure correct spelling of names in the Minutes. VVLUINAAKI Xkt,%jUl..7'1-1V AilL1CSn771i�L YLH1V1V1LV la 1V1V11V11D.�1V1V AGENDA ITEM * / ' I-__—_.ST7137ECT: /I��JLU/�,1/�'l TO- Plannine Commission Secretary DATE: FROM: ADDRESS ORGANIZATION: Iro M () U3 to i SUBJECT I would like to address the Planning Commission on the above stated item. Please have`the Commission Minutes reflect my name and address as printed above. Signature NOTE: All persons may attend meetings and address the Planning Commission. This form is intended to assist the Chairman in ensuring that all persons wishing to address the Commission will have the opportunity and to ensure correct spelling of names in the Minutes. VOLUNTARY REQUESTS ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM -91/ S—.- CT: TO: Planning Commission Secretary DATE: FROM: j ea ADDRESS:_;:-23g3D 5ut115o-� L°55;r� y�, nci 0.r, iI-76S ORGANIZATION: SUBJECT: ConAJ, Pec-LA-RS1«'.WS Ck, lkrc�\ I would like to address the Planning Commission on the above stated item. Please have the .Commission Minutes reflect my name and address as printed above. Signature . NOTE: All persons may attend meetings and address the Planning Commission. This form is intended to assist the Chairman in ensuring that all persons wishing to address the Commission will have the opportunity and to ensure correct spelling of names in the Minutes. V V1.UiN 1A.K1 MkZU"I 1V PlUIJISfWO Inn•-rLa1V1V11V1a'-LP1V1LVn0131VPI AGENDA ITEM * 7-1 SUBJECT: CUVUo4V�d1M� TO: Planning Commission Secretary DATE: I �6 FROM:✓ C� ADDRESS: i� S. UQ ; av1 ORGANIZATION: SUBJECT: I would like to address the Planning Commission on the above stated item. Please have the Commission Minutes reflect my name and address as printed above. Signature . NOTE: SH persons may attend meetings and address the Planning Commission. This form is intended to assist the Chairman in ensuring that all persons wishing to address the Commission will have the opportunity and to ensure correct spelling of names in the Minutes. VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM * - , f SUBJECT:+1cALC� / TO: Planning Commission Secretary DATE: FROM: ( P', A tQ ADDRESS: ,2/416 i W" K do e) DRGANIZATION: SUBJECT: I would like to address the Planning Commission on the above stated item. Please have the Commission Minutes reflect my name and address as printed above. Signatu - NOTE: All persons may attend meetings and address the Planning Commission. This form is intended to assist the Chairman in ensuring that all persons wishing to address the Commission will have the opportunity and to ensure correct spelling of names in the Minutes. VWLUINTAKY 1-MVU�k-N- -,A J AU" ans ri[v�1�11�tr t vlvJtvlt�alvly AGENDA ITEM TO: Planning Commission Secretary DATE: FROM:i�iY(�/J2Gf ADDRESS: ORGANIZATION: SUBJECT: _ I would like to address the Planning Commission on the above stated item. Please have the Commission Minutes reflect my name and address asprinted above. Signature NOTE: All persons may attend meetings and address the Planning Commission. This form is intended to assist the Chairman in ensuring that all persons wishing to address the Commission will have the opportunity and to ensure correct spelling of names in the Minutes. VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMESION r___....... ,��_.._.. AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT: G GL�' �f> ...... TO: Planning. Commission Secretary DATE: j2 3 ~f r FROM:Zoe- �h� ADDRESS: ORGANIZATION: SUBJECT:/�ys �,�K� v� I would like to address the Planning Commission on the above stated item. Please have the Commission Minutes reflect my name and address as printed above. Signature - - NOTE: All persons may attend meetings and address the Planning Commission. This form is intended to assist the Chairman in ensuring that all .persons wishing to address the Commission will have the opportunity and to ensure 'correct spelling of names in the Minutes. Agenda Item 7.3 Plot plan found in project file — Development Review No. 2002-35 — 3079 Windmill Drive, Diamond Bar, CA M U i z 0 M 0 v U� U o(]y N m w F' W � a o Pa, z� aL). o ax a ax p o UN o C7 z0 z U V U 0 Mo 3 �N a 7 z° A ¢ c a z z a z z Z M ° z U E O a F z Q Q z w s r s I Ua ~ ¢ O M Z p p A W p m O O O Q '^ a Q' v S g n n M N m N m N N N n N U M N O ... O O r N O NO O O O O C C4 C4 0 N N O N O CV N 0 0 ONN N S S N Q N S 4t: `� S O N S Ri V N O Op Np..,, O W. NO N N N O N U N N C7NaiUgEa A Q U9 U U q u N z _u c a x u z z rn 3 w o u a z ¢ E m W V h u a2i c a w c F m •v O c O n O o U w M o A ZOO Wa; aV} o ��- > ��za E-cn � 0 C7F a� G E, zC Z n W a o z vFi C7 >bo u Fs z �o � O U K azo AVAte+ 0.w w rxi,� �� Ca7V z U M M N N N V O O O O 0 Q U Q U Q U U z a a a 22-z a A 0.d' HQ FQ F� FQ z u U u O O O O w oz o uz O z °z oz 0-z °z oz aWv Q a Wt: w Qp� QF" Ep q0 qQqLl, Od OdO`� ppQ x zp zo zo zo 0 z 0 Oy F w w ��w z zw z Ww uz �z �z w Uz w as Q Cd U O Z OQ ° �w w 'd q A y'y O wU0 0 rn W a w �3C1 a� O0 F W J h x xQ W z xp U O x z � 0 � F or x a, v N x W U d W c4 N N N >�� ppww FUI F clo a a cl r-4 rq Cl) O in N O Np S O N N O O. pN O QN I I I I i I I z O O O O O O U V U U U U U o �o �o o o o o W F F 11-T, W 1<1 W F V-1 F W F W F W F F F F F F 0000 a o o o4 o o o o o o z� z� z� z� z� z� z� WQF ,R ,2 QF Q0 Q0 pH LL O" p� CF - )QF F) zo zo zo zo zo za zo zwww Fw Fw w 0 0 0 <zw 0 Q F C7 rn O O O N N No 0 N -. N N � a � M M N N N V N 3 p — A a A A F '� z u U u G u n V 3 p — F a 0c F '� z u u G u Oago E CG o a W U E Q Cd U z Z OQ ° �w W° vFi m z E O w „. z m O A y'y O wU0 Q- p. Py' �3C1 z o a c = mz x w _iV d U O z[ Q� . aA_ ..¢ .Ca va. >.. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING AND AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF DIAMOND BAR On January 28, 2003, at 7:00 P.M., the Diamond Bar Planning Commission will hold a regular meeting at the South Coast Quality Management District, 21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California. Items for consideration are listed on the attached agenda. I, Stella Marquez, declare as follows: I am employed by the City of Diamond Bar, Community and Development Services Department. On January 28, 2003, I posted a copy of the Notice for the Regular Meeting of the Diamond Bar Planning Commission, to be held on January 28, 2003, at each of the following locations: South Coast Quality Management Heritage Park District Auditorium 2900 Brea Canyon Road 21865 East Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Diamond Bar, CA 91765 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct Executed on January 28, 2003, at Diamond Bar, California. Stella Marquez Community and Devel m ervices Dept. gANaftidavitposNng.doc Diamond Bar Villas 23330-23460 Sunset Crossing Road Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Bate: January 28, 2043 To: City of Diamond Bar Planning Commission From: The residents on Sunset Crossing Road Subject: Objection to the issuance of a permit for the Global Mission Church Dear City Officials, We, the residents (And taxpayers) living on Sunset Crossing Road, hereby object to the use of the former LA Fitness building located at 23425 Sunset Crossing Road for the proposed new site of the Global Mission Church. As residents on an already very busy street we ask that the City of Diamond Bar reject the application based on the following reasons: + Public Parking on Sunset Crossing Road between 23330.23410 is already,'' a problem based on the existing businesses across the street utilizing this area for their employee/clientele to park their vehicles. A church will compound this problem immensely. ♦ Residents in the condominium complex will no longer have access to Public Street parking due to the insufficient parking capacity located at 23425 Sunset Crossing Road. We strongly believe that lack of adequate parking will overflow onto the public street which we as homeowners/residents have as much right to as those attending services ® Since Sunset Crossing Road is a very busy street, the additional traffic will hinder the delay time of emergency services; as well as, increase the probability of more accidents. e We ask if the City of Diamond Har would have to issue special parking permits to the residents and if so, who would pay for those pennits? The, city, the residents or would the church pay for the permits? e Even though the owner of that property and the glass building next door assures that the church members would have access to the parking lot by the glass office building, what's to stop the church members from parking in front of our condos. For example if the church, has regularly scheduled services in addition to a wedding or some other event? o If the city.decided to issue permits, who bears the financial burden of paying the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department to enforce the permits? That doesn't address the pulling of on duty personnel to handle traffic and parking probleans from other calls of a more important nature. o As homeowners there is also the concern of possible lowering of property values as well as the quality of life in our neighborhood. It is apparent that during church services the homeowners (taxpayers) would not have sufficient public parking for their friends and family who visit on a regular basis. o Finally we wish to point out that under no conditions are these objections based on religious or moral grounds. Sincerely, Residents of Diamond Bar Villas, 23330 Sunset Crossing Road A:,LI�'� B: C: D:—� r 23340 Sunset Crossing Road A:A •;v._ _---- 23350 Sunset Crossing Road ci- D: 23360 Sunset Crossing Road A: B: C C�- C D ip q, 23410 Sunset Crossing Road 1. A: B. - D: 2420 Sunset Crossing Road A: B' C: D:_ 23430 Sunset Crossing Road A: B: C: D: 23440 Sunset Crossing Road B: A D: A: in. D: .23450 Sunset Cross b Y460 Sunset Crossing Road B: C: e, - ,j `- D: �,;: _� ...rry0 v ii Hca fic',rt�re'r12:,b —=—,-I-d-`I;-IdY for Cy —:Ezapity k File reviewed by ��d des ruction by City Clerk