Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/24/2013 PCPLANNING FILE COPY COMMISSION AGENDA September 24, 2013 7:00 P.M. City Hall, Windmill Community Room 21810 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Vice Chairman Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Tony Torng Ashok Dhingra Frank Farago Jimmy Lin Jack Shah Copies of staff reports or other written documentation relating to agenda items are on file in the Planning Division of the Community Development Department, located at 21810 Copley Drive, and are available for public inspection. If you have questions regarding an agenda item, please call (909) 839-7030 during regular business hours. Written materials distributed to the Planning Commission within 72 hours of the Planning Commission meeting are available for public inspection immediately upon distribution in the City Clerk's office at 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California, during normal business hours. In an effort to comply with the requirements of Title 11 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the City of Diamond Bar requires that any person in need of any type of special equipment, assistance or accommodation(s) in order to communicate at a City public meeting must inform the Community Development Department at (909) 839-7030 a minimum of 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting. a DIAJIOA`D DART refrain from smoking, eating or drinking in the Auditorium The City of Diamond Bar uses recycled paper and encourages you to do the same City of Diamond Bar Planning Commission MEETING RULES PUBLIC INPUT The meetings of the Diamond Bar Planning Commission are open to the public. A member of the public may address the Commission on the subject of one or more agenda items and/or other items of which are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Diamond Bar Planning Commission. A request to address the Commission should be submitted in writing at the public hearing, to the Secretary of the Commission, As a general rule, the opportunity for public comments will take place at the discretion of the Chair. However, in order to facilitate the meeting, persons who are interested parties for an item may be requested to give their presentation at the time the item is called on the calendar. The Chair may limit individual public input to five minutes on any item; or the Chair may limit the total amount of time allocated for public testimony based on the number of people requesting to speak and the business of the Commission. Individuals are requested to conduct themselves in a professional and businesslike manner. Comments and questions are welcome so that all points of view are considered prior to the Commission making recommendations to the staff and City Council. In accordance with State Law (Brown Act), all matters to be acted on by the Commission must be posted at least 72 hours prior to the Commission meeting. In case of emergency or when a subject matter arises subsequent to the posting of the agenda, upon making certain findings, the Commission may act on item that is not on the posted agenda. INFORMATION RELATING TO AGENDAS AND ACTIONS OF THE COMMISSION Agendas for Diamond Bar Planning Commission meetings are prepared by the Planning Division of the Community Development Department. Agendas are available 72 hours prior to the meeting at City Hall and the public library, and may be accessed by personal computer at the contact information below. Every meeting of the Planning Commission is recorded and duplicate recordings are available for a nominal charge. ADA REQUIREMENTS A cordless microphone is available for those persons with mobility impairments who cannot access the public speaking area. The service of the cordless microphone and sign language interpreter services are available by giving notice at least three business days in advance of the meeting. Please telephone (909) 839-7030 between 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m., Monday through Thursday, and 7:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Friday. HELPFUL CONTACT INFORMATION Copies of Agenda, Rules of the Commission, CDs of Meetings (909) 839-7030 Email: infota-D.diamondbarca.gov Website: www.diamondbarca.gov CITY OF DIAMOND BAR PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, September 24, 2013 AGENDA CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 p.m. Next Resolution No. 2013-21 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: 1. ROLL CALL: COMMISSIONERS: Vice Chairman Tony Torng, Ashok, Dhingra, Frank Farago, Jimmy Lin, Jack Shah 2. REORGANIZATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION: Selection of Chairman and Vice Chairman. 3. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is the time and place for the general public to address the members of the Planning Commission on any item that is within their jurisdiction, allowing the public an opportunity to speak on non-public hearing and non -agenda items. Please complete a Speaker's Card for the recording Secretary (completion of this form is voluntary) There is a five-minute maximum time limit when addressing the Planning Commission. * * * * * * * * 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Chairman 5. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following items listed on the consent calendar are considered routine and are approved by a single motion. Consent calendar items may be removed from the agenda by request of the Commission only: 5.1 Minutes of the Regular Meeting: August 27, 2013 6. OLD BUSINESS: None 7. NEW BUSINESS: None 8. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING(S): 8.1 Development Review No. PL2012-475 — Under the authority of Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.48, the applicant, Jack Wu, and property owner, Justin Chien, are requesting Development Review approval to construct a 573 square -foot, second -story addition to an existing single-family residence on SEPTEMBER 24, 2013 PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA a 1.6 gross acre (69,696 square -foot) lot. The subject property is zoned rural Residential (RR) with a consistent underlying General Plan land use designation of Rural Residential. (Continued from August 27, 2013) Project Address: 23223 Ridge Line Road Property Owner: Justin Chien 2880 Wood Bridge Court Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Applicant: Jack Wu 10410 Lower Azusa Road, #203 EI Monte, CA 91731 Environmental Determination: The project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on that assessment, the City has determined the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to Article 19 under Section 15301(e) (additions to existing structures) of the CEQA Guidelines. No further environmental review is required. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue this item to a future date, to be determined, to allow the applicant sufficient time to resubmit plans. PUBLIC HEARING(S): 9.1 General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Development Review, and Variance No. PL2011-201 — Under the authority of Diamond Bar Municipal Code Sections 22.48, 22.54 and 22.70, the applicant JWL Associates, and the property owner/trustee, James Chin Chou, are requesting a General Plan Amendment to change the General Plan land use designation from Medium Density Residential (RM) to Commercial/Office (CO); a Zone Change to change the zoning designation from Neighborhood Commercial (C-1) to Office Professional (OP) to bring the General Plan land use and zoning designations on the subject property into conformance with each other; Development Review approval to construct a 4,400 square -foot, three-story professional office building on a 11,225 gross square -foot (0.26 acre) lot; and a Variance request to allow the encroachment of a loading space in the front setback. Project Address: 1111-1149 N. Diamond Bar Blvd. Property Owner: James Chin Chou, Trustee 1359 Bentley Ct. West Covina, CA 91791 SEPTEMBER 24, 2013 PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA Applicant: JWL Associates 1221 S. Hacienda Blvd. Hacienda Heights, CA 91745 Environmental Determination: Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section 15070, the City prepared an Initial Study and Negative Declaration for this project. Pursuant to CEQA Section 15105, the public review period for the Negative Declaration began August 9, 2013, and ended August 29, 2013. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue this item to a future date, to be determined, to allow the applicant sufficient time to resubmit plans. 9.2 Development Review and Variance No. PL2012-399 — Under the authority of Diamond Bar Municipal Code Sections 22.48 and 22.54, the applicant, Rick Dirksen, and property owner, Samdeep Shah, are requesting Development Review approval to construct a new single-family residence consisting of 8,063 square feet of livable area; two garages totaling 1,000 square feet, and 2,284 square feet of patio areas on a 5.57 gross acre (242,628 square -foot) lot. A Variance is requested to allow separated driveways in the front yard. The subject property is zoned Rural Residential (RR) with a consistent underlying General Plan land use designation of Rural Residential. Project Address: 2205 Rusty Pump Rd. Property Owner: Sandeep and Ahju Shah 6397 Rhodes Ln. Riverside, CA 92506 Applicant: Rick Dirksen 9461 Hughes Dr. Corona, CA 92883 Environmental Determination: The project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on that assessment, the City has determined the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to Article 19 under Section 15303(a) (one single-family residence in a residential zone) of the CEQA Guidelines. No further environmental review is required. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review and Variance No. PL2012-399, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the draft resolution. SEPTEMBER 24, 2013 PAGE 4 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA 10. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS / INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 11 1i PA STAFF COMMENTS / INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 11.1 Public Hearing dates for future projects: SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: CITY COUNCIL MEETING: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING: PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING: 13. ADJOURNMENT: Tuesday, October 1, 2013, 6:30 p.m. Diamond Bar City Hall Windmill Community Room 21810 Copley Drive (temporary location) Tuesday, October 8, 2013, 7:00 p.m. Diamond Bar City Hall Windmill Community Room 21810 Copley Drive Thursday, October 10, 2013 - 7:00 p.m. Diamond Bar City Hall Windmill Community Room 21810 Copley Drive Thursday, October 24, 2013, 7:00 p.m. Diamond Bar City Hall Windmill Community Room 21810 Copley Drive MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 27, 2013 CALL TO ORDER: Vice Chairman Torng called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. in the City Hall Windmill Room, 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Commissioner Farago led the Pledge of Allegiance. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Frank Farago, Jimmy Lin, Jack Shah, Vice Chairman Tony Torng Also present: Greg Gubman, Community Development Director; Grace Lee, Senior Planner; Natalie Tobon, Assistant Planner; and Stella Marquez, Administrative Coordinator. 2. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: None 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: As presented 4. CONSENT CALENDAR: 4.1 Minutes of the August 13, 2013, Regular Meeting. C/Farago moved, C/Lin seconded, to approve the August 13, 2013, regular meeting minutes as presented. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Farago, Lin, Shah, VC/Torng NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None 5. OLD BUSINESS: None 6. NEW BUSINESS: 6.1 General Plan Status Report for 2013 Review - Received and filed. SP/Lee presented staff's report and recommended that the Planning Commission approve the report and forward to the City Council to receive and file. AUGUST 27, 2013 7 PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION C/Lin said he thought that the City of Industry bought the Diamond Bar Honda property and CDD/Gubman responded that staff believes the property is still owned by Denley Investment & Management Company in West Hollywood. VC/Torng asked the status of Larkstone Park. SP/Lee responded that the. Tentative Tract Map has been approved and Lewis is developing the public park designs. However, Lewis recently discovered that there was a landslide on the site that will have to be remediated and they are working with staff to resolve the issue and design a future park as required as part of the Tentative Map approval. There was no one present who wished to speak on this matter. PUBLIC HEARING(S): 7.1 Conditional Use Permit No. PL2013-22 — The applicant requested approval of a Conditional Use Permit to upgrade an existing Alcoholic Beverage Control license from Type 20 (Beer and Wine) to Type 21 (General) for offsite consumption in conjunction with the sale of motor fuel at an existing ARCO/ampm service station and convenience store. The subject property is zoned Neighborhood Commercial (C-1) with a consistent underlying General Plan land use designation of General Commercial (C). PROJECT ADDRESS: 3302 S. Diamond Bar Boulevard Diamond Bar, CA 91765 PROPERTY OWNER: Farsai and Farsai, Inc. 23276 S. Pointe Drive #100 Laguna Hills, CA 92653 APPLICANT: Ryan Farsai 23276 S. Pointe Drive #100 Laguna Hills, CA 92653 SP/Lee presented staff's report and recommended Planning Commission approval of Conditional Use Permit No. PL2013-22, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the draft resolution. AUGUST 27, 2013 PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION C/Lin asked if the Lennar proposed park was on the east side of this project and SP/Lee responded that C/Lin was correct. It is on the southeast corner of Diamond Bar Boulevard and Brea Canyon Road. C/Lin asked if this was part of the property that used to be owned by the school and SP/Lee responded that C/Lin was again correct and the property is also known as Site D. C/Lin asked if one day a school was built at that location, what would happen. SP/Lee responded that the property is currently zoned for residential uses so a school would not be allowed to be built on that property. CDD/Gubman said that hypothetically, if a school were built on Site D, the ARCO/ampm would become a legal non -conforming use and it would be grandfathered because it was there first. VC/Torng opened the public hearing. Ryan Farsai, applicant, said his family has owned the business since 1992 and his mother purchased the property in 2003. He thanked the Commission for its continued support of the small local business owner. His family was lucky to have won the Type 21 license in an ABC lottery and get to this hearing today. BP sold the ARCO brand to Tesoro, an oil refinery out of Texas, which is now the master franchiser and is a public trading company. Unfortunately, they are no longer the low -price gas leader. Today Costco, Sam's Club, Albertsons and those types of establishments are offering gasoline at wholesale prices which are better than any other establishment within a five mile radius of their businesses. They accept credit cards and American Express and offer cash -back rewards, options that he cannot offer to his customers. At one point his establishment was offering the customer the low price option because credit cards were not accepted. Times are changing and he must conform to Tesoro's guidelines which has 240 sites branded gas lines. They accept credit cards and price gas just a couple of cents more, so over a span of time he has seen the volume of his station decline. In order to adapt and attract more customers to increase the business, his family has decided to include this change to improve his customer base. VC/Torng asked Mr. Farsai if he reviewed staff's report and concurred with the Conditions of Approval and Mr. Farsai responded that he did review staff's report and concurred with the Conditions of Approval. VC/Torng closed the public hearing. AUGUST 27, 2013 ELI .3 irlA!"T PAGE 4 PLANNING COMMISSION C/Lin moved, C/Farago seconded, to approve Conditional Use Permit No. PL2013-22, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the draft resolution. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Farago, Lin, Shah, VC/Torng NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None 7.2 Development Review and Tree Permit No. PL2012-475 — Under the authority of Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.48, the applicant, Jack Wu and property owner, Justin Chien requested Development Review approval to construct a 573 square -foot addition including a new third level to an existing single family residence on a 1.6 gross acre (69,696 square foot) lot. A Tree Permit was requested to remove three Coast Live Oak trees and one Black Walnut tree to be replaced at a 3:1 ratio. The subject property is zoned Rural Residential (RR) with a consistent underlying General Plan land use designation of Rural Residential. PROJECT ADDRESS: PROPERTY OWNER: 23223 Ridge Line Road Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Justin Chien 2880 Woodbridge Court Diamond Bar, CA 91765 APPLICANT: Jack Wu 10410 Lower Azusa Road #203 EI Monte, CA 91731 AP/Tobon presented staff's report and recommended Planning Commission approval of Development Review and Tree Permit No. PL2012-475, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval listed within the draft resolution. C/Shah asked the condition of the trees that were proposed to be removed. AP/Tobon responded that photographs of the trees were provided to the Commission in staff's report and stated that the condition of the trees is "fair." She did not know the age of the trees. C/Shah asked AUGUST 27, 2013 PAGE 5 PLANNING COMMISSION why the trees needed to be removed.. He could see that they conflicted with the retaining wall but said they did not appear to conflict with the construction area. AP/Tobon responded that the trees need to be removed to create the buildable pad for the rear setback. VC/Torng said that staff's report mentions the current condition of zero feet in the rear yard so this pad is to build up the retaining walls and build up the pad in the back. AP/Tobon said that VC/Torng was correct and currently, the property is sloped with no buildable pad in the back. C/Shah said that according to his read of the plans, all trees are outside the buildable area. AP/Tobon said that while the trees that are going to be removed are not where the addition is, it is where the retaining walls are. C/Shah asked why the retaining walls could not go around the trees. CDD/Gubman responded that Oak trees in particular are very sensitive to the grade on which they are located. Any change to the grade up against the tree will affect their physical and biological health and they would not be able to withstand the soil being raised at their base. In order for those trees to be retained, the grade that exists below their drip line would have to be preserved. Theoretically, the applicant could reconfigure the retaining walls to preserve the grade at those trees at the drip line. It would require a special design to accommodate the Oak tree preservation. C/Shah said he was still not convinced that the grade would have to be raised where there is a retaining wall. Where the trees are located, the grade would not need to be raised. It can be maintained at varying heights. How many feet will the grade be raised? James Hu, project manager said that the difference in the slope from the first row to the last row is about 20 feet and the trees are about 30 feet or so, so in order to retain the trees at their current location and create a 10 percent buildable pad in the same location to have a 25 foot slope it would mean that the first grade would go up the trunk of the tree about 10 or 15 feet which would not work. The applicant and owner explored going further to the outside boundary of the tree and still maintain a 10 percent slope for the buildable pad in order to meet the City's code requirement for a 25 foot setback. Unless the 25 foot setback can be reduced to preserve the trees, there is no other way to do this in order to meet the City's requirement. This project has very little changes in the footprint of the building. All of the work is done within the interior partition and this is actually an update of the house which requires the project to meet the / 1 f Al ,r'T AUGUST 27, 2013 PAGE 6 PLANNING COMMISSION City's requirement. He actually inquired about a variance for this project and the answer he received was no. He would like to save the trees but he has no other choice. In order to change the surface from 40 percent to 10 percent it will require 800 cubic yards of fill and if the project were required to increase it further out, it would mean double the fill which is not very practical. He showed the photo of the area behind the house and the retaining wall which will become the buildable pad that is required to be 10 percent. The photo also shows how deep the slope is at the retaining wall in its current configuration. He has to do a stepped retaining wall and the code requires a four -foot high maximum retaining wall and that is why it is configured the way it is. C/Shah said he did not believe that there would need to be 10 or 15 feet additional dirt at the tree base of tree #14. Mr. Hu said it would definitely require 10 or 15 feet. It is difficult to get an exact view but the trees are in between the different levels of the retaining walls. He showed C/Shah where the tree and the natural slope are located and said that in order to build a retaining, wall the slope would have to be maintained and the soil would cover at least half of the tree trunk. The issue is the 10 percent slope and unfortunately, if it cannot be changed there is no other way to save the trees. C/Lin said he presumed the 3:1 replacement ratio was in line with the City's ordinance for tree replacement and that the applicant would follow the ordinance. CDD/Gubman responded that C/Lin was correct that the requirement is a 3:1 replacement with another protected variety of tree. C/Farago said it appeared to him that there was no change to the footprint of the house and AP/Tobon responded affirmatively. C/Farago said he was curious why the setback requirement if there is no addition to the footprint of the house because it seems like a great deal of expense to the owner in order to meet that setback requirement when there is no apparent infringement on the setback. CDD/Gubman responded that it is not a requirement because the structure currently does not have the minimum rear setback so to create a rear yard is really the choice of the property owner. It is not a code requirement because the property already has a non -conforming rear setback situation and the property owner is allowed to continue that non -conformity, they are just not allowed to "worsen" the condition. C/Farago said that his understanding was that AUGUST 27, 2013 PAGE 7 PLANNING COMMISSION when the property owner requested a Variance so that they would not have to remove the trees it was denied and C/Farago asked if that was correct. CDD/Gubman said he was not aware of that. VC/Torng opened the public hearing. James Hu, project manager responded to C/Farago that during the design process the answer he received while working with the Planning Department about adding third floor square footage was that as long as he was adding square footage he would have to meet current code which meant that the owner would need to have the 25 foot conforming setback on the rear yard. He asked over the counter if a Variance was possible and in this case, the answer he received was "no." He wished there was a way around this issue because it will cost the property owner a lot of money for this project and he has discussed this with the civil engineer to minimize the amount of fill. Perhaps there is another way to complete the project but this is the current design. He did not realize he might have another option. C/Farago said he was curious because it seemed like the City was forcing the owner to remove the trees and put in the retaining walls and wanted clarification on that issue. He thanked the speaker. C/Lin asked the width and size of the footing of the retaining wall. Mr. Hu said those were not yet designed but the maximum retaining wall height is four feet and there should be a three foot separation between the walls. He will submit the plan with the grading plan when he applies for the retaining wall permit. C/Lin asked if it was customary to not show the full design specifications on the drawings when asking the Commission to approve a project. CDD/Gubman responded that size of the footing and retaining walls are structural requirements. They are building code requirements for review at the construction document phase. VCfTorng asked why the pad was needed if the 35 foot height requirement was being met. CDD/Gubman said that no staff member present this evening is aware of any conversation that insisted that the applicant create this pad to establish a 25 foot rear setback. If there was another member of staff that told that to the. applicant CDD/Gubman would have to look into that. Because this is an existing grandfathered situation, there is not a requirement to create that 25 foot rear setback when they are not proposing to encroach further into that direction. VC/Torng asked if the DRAFT AUGUST 27, 2013 PAGE 8 PLANNING COMMISSION height requirement of 35 feet was being met since this is being built on the third floor of the rear side. CDD/Gubman said he did not believe there was any change to the surface grade at the base of the structure. Mr. Hu said that the pad would not change the height level at the base of the wall. It is just that the slope would be flatter and the height would not change from the previous maximum height approved. VC/Torng asked if the applicant was willing to go back and discuss the proposal with the Planning Department to avoid having to build retaining walls and conform to the 25 foot setbacks and Mr. Hu responded "of course." CDD/Gubman said that the Planning Commission could keep the public hearing open and continue the matter to September 24 to address any revisions that might be proposed. VC/Torng asked Mr. Hu if he agreed to a continuation and Mr. Hu said he would have to speak with the owner first. Obviously, they have invested a lot of time already. VC/Torng said that tonight the Commission has to make a decision to either continue the matter or base an approval or denial on the proposed project. CDD/Gubman said that another option would be for the Commission to approve the project as proposed and give the applicant the opportunity to revise the application so that the Planning Department can bring the matter back to the Commission with a new site design that did not include retaining walls and a built up pad. Mr. Hu said he liked that option better than continuing the matter. C/Shah said he was still not convinced that two, if not all four trees could be saved and in his opinion, all four can be saved. He recommended that the applicant take another look at the design of the retaining walls to look at the possibility of saving the trees. Mr. Hu asked the Commission to vote on the project as proposed and he would work with the Planning Department to save the trees. He has discussed saving the trees with the architect but has not discussed any other options with- the property owner because he was not aware he had any other option but to comply with current code when he came to the meeting this evening. He was working with a planner who is no longer with the city who told him that when adding square footage, the property had to be brought to code. If he has to revise the site plan and put in another application he could do so. MnRAFT AUGUST 27, 2013 PAGE 9 PLANNING COMMISSION CDD/Gubman suggested that if the Planning Commission is satisfied with the architectural design of the house and the addition as submitted, it could be approved with the inclusion of a condition that would allow CDD/Gubman, as the delegated authority, to approve a revision to the plan that would involve the removal of the pad provided that the other architectural elements being proposed for the house are not changed. This would require a decision on the Tree Permit with the approval, but with that added condition, staff could work with them administratively to eliminate the issue with the retaining walls and take the debate about the trees completely off of the table. VC/Torng closed the public hearing and brought the matter back to the Commission for deliberation. C/Shah reiterated that he wanted the trees saved and wanted staff to work with the applicant on this matter. If there is no alternative, so be it. CDD/Gubman said that if elevation of the pad grades is eliminated and the retaining walls are not required, the trees will no longer be in jeopardy. C/Lin said his understanding of the grandfather clause was that if the footprint was not touched it would continue to exist with the non- conformance clause. However, the applicant is actually adding two areas, one of which is 88.2 square feet and the other 70.62 square feet to the back which in essence encroaches into the back of the property which would violate the non-conformance grandfather clause. CDD/Gubman said that would not be the case because it is not the footprint that is being pushed out, the discussion has to do with where the setbacks are established by existing building footprint. The site plan shows an existing module at the rear of the building that is in line with what is being proposed to be pushed out so that existing building wall would be the point from which the grandfather situation exists. C/Lin moved approval of Development Review and Tree Permit No. PL2012-475. VC/Torng asked if C/Lin wanted to add the condition and C/Lin asked what condition. VC/Torng said "the condition for granting the Community Development Director, as the delegated authority, to approve a revision to the plan that would involve the removal of the pad provided that the other architectural elements being proposed for the house are not changed. AUGUST 27, 2013 PAGE 10 PLANNING COMMISSION C/Lin said that if the applicant does not have a problem with the approval and staff does not have a problem with the application why would it be a concern to the Commission. C/Farago said that it sounded to him, based on the conversation with the project manager, that they prefer to eliminate the retaining walls and removal of the trees but were directed by City staff that it was a requirement that they put it in. So the City wants to give the applicant an opportunity to address that issue and to save costs and eliminate the need for removing those trees. C/Lin said he asked the applicant if he had a problem with that and Mr. Hu responded that he supported the last option suggested by CDD/Gubman to approve as is and because he cannot make that decision, he speaks for himself only and not the owner who is not present tonight. He would prefer that the Commission approve the matter and allow him to work with the Planning Department to modify the site plan having demonstrated staff's approval to eliminate the retaining wall and save the trees. C/Lin said he did not believe the Commission could approve partial drawings. Mr. Hu said it was not a partial drawing. He has to meet with the owner and his desire would be to eliminate the retaining wall because it costs a lot of money and they would have to take out trees, which was not necessary from what he now understood. SP/Lee stated that typically, applicants request to build a buildable pad for usable space in their rear yards. She recommended that the applicant check with the property owner whether they would indeed not like to build up this buildable pad. Mr. Hu said he asked the property owner and the answer was that they did not believe they actually needed the space; however, that answer was in response to what he thought the requirements were at the time. Mr. Hu said he asked the applicant and they told him they did not really believe they needed the space but that was before he thought it was a City requirement and the owner responded that if it is a requirement they would have to follow the law. C/Shah said he does not like the fact that the property owner is not present tonight and that the applicant does not have the authority to make the decision on behalf of the owner. The property owner should be present and the Commission may then authorize the Community Development Director to work with them for an outcome that can be presented to the Commission on September 24 and the Commission can approve the project at that time. He did not believe the Commission was AUGUST 27, 2013 PAGE 11 M 113 ,FL PLANNING COMMISSION in a position to approve anything at this time. C/Shah recommended that the Commission either allow the Community Development Director to proceed or continue the matter to September 24. C/Farago asked CDD/Gubman to restate his recommendation. CDD/Gubman stated that the addition to the house is as presented on the plans before the Commission. The question being raised at this time is whether to have the tiered retaining walls to create the "back yard" or not and keep the main slope as it currently exists. In either scenario, the architecture does not change. The question before the Commissioners is whether they are comfortable or can reasonably foresee the difference between a project with terraced retaining walls and a pad versus the project with the existing slope left as is. Architecturally, the house will not change and only topographically will the site look different. If the Commissioners can visualize that to a level of confidence where they feel they can defer the modification of the project from terraced retaining walls to leaving the slope in its natural condition, he would suggest that the Commission approve the project as submitted this evening and add a condition that states that "should the applicant elect to eliminate the terraced retaining walls that can be approved administratively." C/Shah said that more and more it looks to him like the architecture of the building is one thing and the overall landscape of the property is another part of the project which is extremely important for a residential back yard and he would rather give the architect and property owner an opportunity to re-examine that possibility so that if they want a pad and back yard they can redesign the retaining walls and save the trees. If the property owner decides he does not want retaining walls and a pad that would be his choice. C/Farago said that if the Commission entertains a motion to approve as submitted with a condition that they could resubmit the matter of the terraced retaining wall and leave it to the Community Development Director's discretion, would that be acceptable to the City and staff and CDD/Gubman responded yes. CDD/Gubman said that he was asking the Commissioners if they had the comfort level to defer that decision on that component of the project. C/Farago asked for clarification that an approval would mean an option to do either or to which CDD/Gubman responded that the Commission's option is for the owner and applicant to bring a revised plan without the retaining walls back to the full Commission to approve or to defer that authority to CDD/Gubman to approve. T T AUGUST 27, 2013 PAGE 12 PLANNING COMMISSION C/Farago moved, C/Shah seconded, to approve Development Review and Tree Permit No. PL2012-475 with the addition of the Condition that the Community Development Director work with the property owner and applicant to modify the project and bring back the revised landscape plan to the Commission for the retaining walls. C/Shah reiterated his desire to save the trees. The issue is that the property owner is not present to speak on this matter as to whether they Wish to have the elevated pad or not. In lieu of hearing firsthand rather than via hearsay, it places the Commission in a bind to approve the project without the retaining walls because if the property owner decided he wanted the pad, staff would have to come back to the Commission. Alternatively, the Commission can approve the project as presented and should the owner elect to no longer have the retaining walls as part of this plan, they would not 'have to come back to the Commission if the Commissioners allowed CDD/Gubman to work with the applicant to modify the plan. C/Shah said that such an approval would give the property owner the authority to build the project as proposed. And that is not C/Shah's intent this evening. His intent is to have them try to eliminate any obstacles in terms of saving the trees. If CDD/Gubman is given the authority, the Commission should approve only the building and let the Community Development Director render his best judgment. C/Farago said his motion was made because Mr. Hu's understanding with the property owner is that their intent was not to build the setback and to not remove the trees and not have the added expense of building the retaining walls and it seems to him that if the Commission gives the applicant the opportunity to eliminate the retaining walls he would take advantage of it. He restated his motion as follows: C/Farago moved to approve Development Review and Tree Permit No. PL2012-475 as presented with the condition that should the applicant chose to do so, eliminate the retaining walls at the discretion of the Community Development Director. C/Shah again stated that once approved, the Commission loses its decision power because the project manager has said that he needs to check with the property owner. So rather than approving as is, approve only the building portion with the remaining portion subject to the AUGUST 27, 2013 PAGE 13 PLANNING COMMISSION Community Development Director working with the property owner to see if he can save the trees. As a property owner, he would love to have the pad in the back yard area and he would love to save the trees, too. C/Lin said that no one seconded the motion and VC/Torng announced that the motion died (for lack of a second). C/Lin said that the owner agreed to the 3:1 tree replacement ratio and did not feel that saving the trees was the issue. C/Lin moved to approve Development Review and Tree Permit No. PL2012-475 with two alternatives as follows: Approve the project as submitted or eliminate the pad, retaining walls and tree removal at the discretion of the Community Development Director. C/Farago seconded the motion. C/Shah said again that the motion was an either or and he felt the owner needed to make a decision. He believed the motion should give very clear division. VC/Torng said he believed the motion made it very clear that there were two alternatives, one the current project in which the trees may not be saved but C/Lin's first alternative should perhaps contain a condition that provided the owners make a best effort to save the trees to every extent possible and asked C/Lin to add the condition. C/Lin said he did not believe that kind of statement had any enforcement power. He would rather empower staff to work with the property owner to save the trees, if necessary. C/Shah reiterated his statement that the matter should be continued. VC/Torng said that the Commission would like a full report on the final outcome. CDD/Gubman said that C/Shah raises a good point. It is difficult to craft language approving two choices. Typically, an approval is subject to a condition that the project is approved in accordance with the plans submitted to the Planning Commission which is the default position. He suggested that the Commission make that the default approval and add a condition that "should the applicant elect to eliminate the retaining walls, h 0 � �^w AUGUST 27, 2013 PAGE 14 PLANNING COMMISSION that the Community Development Director has the discretion to approve the revised grading plan administratively. C/Farago said that was his original motion. What C/Lin says is essentially correct. CDD/Gubman said it is more complicated to craft an approval that contains multiple choices. C/Lin withdrew his motion and asked that C/Farago's original motion be considered. C/Farago withdrew his second of C/Lin's motion. VC/Torng said that since the motion was off of the table he wanted to make a motion because he thought the matter should really be continued to September 24. He is no longer comfortable with the issue because there is no agreement and Commissioners want to see the final plan. VC/Torng moved, C/Shah seconded, to continue this matter to September 24, 2013. C/Farago asked how a postponement would affect the owner since he could not move forward with construction of the addition. VC/Torng said it was only one month and it was the owner's fault because he should be here this evening. C/Shah said this is a concept plan and the engineering plans are not done so time is not that critical. They are not under construction and plans are yet to be prepared. C/Lin called for the question and vote on the motion on the floor. Motion on Call for Question carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Farago, Lin, Shah, VC/Torng NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None C/Lin said that parliamentary procedure dictates that once a Commissioner calls for the question it stops discussion and a vote needs to be taken on the motion. VC/Torng said that question was voted on and now it comes back to his motion. AUGUST 27, 2013 PAGE 15 PLANNING COMMISSION CDD/Gubman said there was a motion by C/Farago and a second by C/Lin. VC/Torng said that one was already withdrawn. CDD/Gubman said okay. VC/Torng said that is why his motion that was seconded by C/Shah and C/Lin came out with a new motion saying call for the question. C/Lin attempted to explain that when the discussion seems to continue on to no conclusion, a Commissioner can call for the question and if everyone agrees, there is a vote on the motion. VC/Torng said now it was time to vote on his motion which was seconded by C/Shah. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Farago, Lin, Shah, VC/Torng NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None 7.3 Development Review and Tree Permit No. PL2013-45 — Under the authority of Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.48, the applicant and property owner, Henry and Jeanne Yue requested Development Review approval to construct a new single family residence consisting of a 9,720 square foot single family residence on a 2.22 gross acre (96,703 square foot) lot. A Tree Permit was requested to remove three Coast Live Oak trees and one California Walnut tree to be replaced at a 3:1 ratio. The subject property is zoned Rural Residential (RR) with a consistent underlying General Plan land use designation of Rural Residential. PROJECT ADDRESS: 2208 Rusty Pump Road (APN 8713-034-019) Diamond Bar, CA 91765 PROPERTY OWNER/ APPLICANT: Henry and Jeanne Yue 3913 S. Hackley Avenue West Covina, CA 91792. AP/Tobon presented staff's report and recommended Planning Commission approval of Development Review and Tree Permit No. PL2013-45, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the draft resolution. VC/Torng opened the public hearing. Jeanne Yue, property owner, said she was excited to present the project to the Planning Commission. AUGUST 27, 2013 is PAGE 16 r D RA RF PLANNING COMMISSION C/Lin stated that while it is not criteria for approval he would like to see something better than a box structure. Mrs. Yue said she has an architectural background. C/Lin said other than his comment, the structure looked pretty nice. C/Shah complimented Mrs. Yue on her design. VC/Torng asked Mrs. Yue if she agreed with the conditions of approval and she responded affirmatively. VC/Torng closed the public hearing. C/Lin moved, C/Shah seconded, to approve Development Review and Tree Permit No. PL2013-45, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Farago, Lin, Shah, VC/Torng None None PLANNING COMMISSIONER COMMENTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: C/Shah said he attended the Council Meeting during which Steve Nelson was awarded a plaque for his 13 plus years of service to the City. The Planning Commission lost a mentor and very good Commissioner and all of the Council Members expressed their gratitude. C/Lin asked if there was any new development on the Ralphs property and CDD/Gubman said that there would most likely be an opening day in 2014 for a major grocery retailer. VC/Torng thanked staff for their reports. 9. STAFF COMMENTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 9.1 Public Hearing dates for future projects. CDD/Gubman reported that the City Council will be considering the Tres Hermanos zone change at next Tuesday's meeting. The September 10 Planning Commission meeting will be canceled due to lack of quorum and the next Planning Commission meeting is scheduled for September 24 during which the review of the Ridgeline addition will continue. In addition, there is a small office building on North Diamond Bar Boulevard that is slated for that agenda. a DRAT AUGUST 27, 2013 PAGE 17 PLANNING COMMISSION 10. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: As listed in tonight's agenda. ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Planning Commission, Vice Chairman Torng adjourned the regular meeting at 8:35 p.m. The foregoing minutes are hereby approved this 24th day of September, 2013. Attest: Respectfully Submitted, Greg Gubman Community Development Director Tony Torng, Vice Chairman U.= PLANNING COMMISSION '111".19, AGENDA REPORT CITY OF DIAMOND BAR - 21810 COPLEY DRIVE - DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765- TEL. (909) 839-7030 -FAX (909) 861-3117 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: MEETING DATE: CASE/FILE NUMBER: PROJECT LOCATION: PROPERTY OWNER: Aj September 24, 2013 Development Review No. PL2012-475 23223 Ridge Line Road Diamond Bar, CA 91765 (APN 8713-005-016) Justin Chien 2880 Wood Bridge Court Diamond Bar, CA 91765 APPLICANT: Shyh Han Wu 10410 Lower Azusa Road #203 EI Monte, CA 91731 On August 27, 2013, the Planning Commission reviewed Development Review and Tree Permit No. PL2012-475 to construct a 573 square -foot addition to an existing home and to replace three Coast Live Oak trees and one Black Walnut tree at a 3:1 ratio. The Planning Commission continued the matter to the September 24, 2013, meeting to give the property owner the opportunity to consider removing the rear pad. On September 16, 2013, the applicant requested additional time to revise and finalize the plans. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue this matter to a date uncertain to allow the applicant additional time to submit revised plans to the Planning Division for review. When a new hearing date is set, staff will re -notice the in accordance with the notification requirements. Prepared by: Natalie Tobon Assistant Planner Reviewed by: S. Le Senior Planner IT PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT CITY OF DIAMOND BAR - 21810 COPLEY DRIVE -DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 -TEL. (909) 839-7030 -FAX (909) 861-3117 AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.1 MEETING DATE: September 24, 2013 CASE/FILE NUMBER: General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Development Review, Variance, and Negative Declaration (Planning Case No. PL2011-201) PROJECT LOCATION: 1111-1149 North Diamond Bar Boulevard (Los Angeles County Assessor's Parcel No. 8706-008-013) PROPERTY OWNER: James Chin Chou, Trustee, 1359 Bentley Court, West Covina, CA 91791 APPLICANT: JWL Associates, 1221 South Hacienda Boulevard, Hacienda Heights, CA 91745 On September 16, 2013, the applicant submitted a written request that the matter be continued to a future Planning Commission meeting. The applicant requested additional time to revise and finalize the project design. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue this matter to a date uncertain. When a new hearing date is set, staff will renotice the matter as a new agenda item in accordance with the required notification procedures. Prepared by: Andrew Gon les Contract Planner Reviewed by: ce . Le Senior Planner PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT CITY OF DIAMOND BAR- 21810 COPLEY DRIVE -DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 - TEL. (909) 839-7030 -FAX (909) 861-3117 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 9.2 MEETING DATE: September 24, 2013 CASE/FILE NUMBER: Development Review and Variance No. PL2012-399 PROJECT LOCATION: 2205 (Lot 43 tTra t 23 83• APN 8713-034y Pump Road, Diamond - CA 91765 017) of PROPERTY OWNER: Sandeep and Ahju Shah 6397 Rhodes Lane Riverside, CA 92506 APPLICANT: Rick Dirksen 9461 Hughes Drive Corona, CA 92883 SUMMARY The applicant is requesting approval of a Development Review application to construct a new multi -story, single-family residence consisting of 8,063 square feet of livable area; two attached two -car garages, totaling 1,000 square feet, located on the opposite ends of the building frontage; and 2,284 square feet of patio area on a 5.57 gross acre (242,628 square -foot) lot. A Variance is concurrently requested to allow two driveways to provide access to the garages. The Development Code permits two drive approaches on a single-family residential lot only in conjunction with a circular driveway. However, due to the shape and topography of the subject property, the creation of a functional circular drive is not feasible. As explained later in this report, although consolidating the two garages into one would eliminate the need for two driveways, the shape and topography of the parcel would then lead to a garage -dominated facade, and thereby diminish the aesthetics of the property as viewed from the street. In light of these factors, staff believes the best design solution is to allow a design which provides access to the garages via two separated driveways. After evaluating the submittal, staff finds that the proposed project—with the exception of the proposed dual driveways—complies with the City's development standards, and that the required Development Review and Variance findings set forth in the Development Code can be made in the affirmative. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review and Variance No. PL 2012-399, based on the findings of fact, and subject to the conditions of approval contained in the attached Resolution. BACKGROUND The site is located in The Diamond Bar Country Estates (The Country) on the east side of Rusty Pump Road, north of Indian Creek Road. The project site is located on a 5.57 gross acre (242,628 square -foot) lot. The site is legally described as Lot 43 of Tract No. 23483, and the Los Angeles County Assessor's Parcel Number (APN) is 8713-034-017. Project Description The proposed three-story residence consists of the following components: 8,063 square feet of living spaces, divided as follows: o A 3,193 square -foot "street level" living area (labeled "top level" on the plans) including a foyer with a 20 -foot high ceiling, a kitchen, breakfast nook, formal dining room, family room, living room, guest bedroom and bathroom, temple, and laundry room. The finished floor elevation of the top level is 1200.00' (FF 1200.00); o A 3,358 square -foot mid level living area (FF 1188.65) including a master suite, two bedroom and bathrooms, storage room, office/library, and game room; and o A 1,512 square -foot lower level (FF 1177.30) consisting of a maid's room, art studio, and party room; Two front -loaded 2 -car garages totaling 1,000 square feet (FF 1201.50 each), located on the opposite sides of the building; Pool and spa; Sports court/play area; and • Courtyard in the front yard. The height of the proposed building is 35', measured from the finished grade to the highest point of the roofline. PL 2012-399 PAGE 2 OF 11 The applicant is not proposing to remove any protected trees. The applicant has obtained approval from The Diamond Bar Country Estates Association. Site and Surrounding General Plan Zoning and Land Uses Site North South Rural Residential Open Space Rural Residential RR RR RR N Vacant Vacant Single -Family Residential East Rural Residential RR Single -Family Residential [West]Rural Residential RR Single -Family Residential Aerial View of Subject Property PL 2012-399 ANALYSIS Review Authority [Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Sections 22.48 and 22.541 Construction of a new single-family residence requires Planning Commission approval of a Development Review application. Development Review approval is required to ensure compliance with the City's General Plan policies, development standards and design guidelines, and to minimize adverse effects of the proposed *project upon the surrounding properties and the City in general. As stated in Section 22.48.010 of the Development Code, the Development Review process was established to ensure that new development and additions to existing development are consistent with the General Plan "through the promotion of high functional and aesthetic standards to complement and add to the economic, physical, and social character" of Diamond Bar. Development Review (DBMC Section 22.48) Development Standards: The following table compares the proposed project with the City's development standards for residential development in the RR zone: -i he rear setaacK is measurea trom me real ui uie uuuunIy LU 1110 VUUU ..I •l = U—m— F— ••• •• ••• V - abuts a descending slope. PL 2012-399 PAGE 4 OF 11 Residential Meets Development Feature Development Proposed Requirements Standards Front Setback 30' 31'-10" Yes Side Setbacks 10'-0" on one side & 14'-9"— north side Yes 15'-0' on the other 15'-8"— south side side. Distance Between 25'-3"— north side Yes Adjoining 25' 48'-8" —south side Structures Rear Setback* 25' 25' Yes Lot Coverage Maximum of 30% 2.6% Yes 35' 35' Yes pBuildingeightE g 2 -car garage 4 -car garage Yes Maximum 4'high retaining walls 4' high walls associated Yes eanng Walls associated with the with the building pad building pad -i he rear setaacK is measurea trom me real ui uie uuuunIy LU 1110 VUUU ..I •l = U—m— F— ••• •• ••• V - abuts a descending slope. PL 2012-399 PAGE 4 OF 11 Site and Grading Configuration: The project site is located on a very steep property with an average descending slope of 37.5%. The applicant is proposing to cut 33 cubic yards of soil and to fill of 5,340 cubic yards of soil to create a buildable pad, so 5,307 cubic yards would have to be imported to the site. Standard dump truck capacities range from 10 to 15 cubic yards, so the proposed amount of import would require between 379 and 530 deliveries. Architectural Features, Colors, and Materials: The architecture of the building is modern with Prairie influences. The proposed building is designed to be symmetrical from street view. The scale and proportions of the proposed house are well balanced and appropriate for the site. Character -defining features of the Prairie style incorporated into the proposed design include the following: Low pitched, hipped roof with flat concrete roof tiles; Large rectilinear windows; Corner windows (a technique Frank Lloyd Wright referred to as "breaking the bo)e'); • Large eave overhangs; Simple ornamentation; and Natural building colors used to highlight architectural details. Front (West) Elevation PL 2012-399 The applicant provided color samples which call for earth tone colors for the exterior finish to soften the building's visual impact on the hillside. Landscaping: The proposed landscape design Landscaping serves to soften the edges of the paved surfaces, enhance the architecture, and create an overall site design that blends in with neighboring homes and the natural environment of the site. In the front yard, various shrubs such as roses, Common Blue Fescue, Moonbeam Coreopsis, French Gray Lavender, and Green Beauty Boxwood are. proposed in the front yard. Trees such as California Sycamores, Desert Willows, and Japanese Blueberries are used within the front yard to frame the facade and complement the architectural massing of the house. All plant types will be drought tolerant and non- invasive species. The project is required to comply with the City's water -efficient landscape requirements, which is noted on the preliminary landscape plans and will be verified during building plan check. The subject property is located within the Los Angeles County Fire Department "Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone." Therefore, the proposed landscaping must comply with the Fire Department's Fuel Modification Plan requirements. The proposed landscaping plans will be submitted for review and approval by the Fire Department during building plan check. Variance (DBMC Section 22.54) The purpose of a variance is to allow for a limited exception or adjustment from the development standards contained in the Development Code. A variance may only be granted when unusual or special circumstances exist on a property—such as location, shape, size, surroundings, topography or other factors—that warrant the granting of such an exception. The decision making authority for a Variance is the Planning Commission. Variances may be granted when the strict application of the Development Code denies the property owner privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zoning districts, or when it creates an unnecessary, and non -self-created, hardship or unreasonable regulation which makes it obviously impractical to require perfect compliance with the development standards. For example, if a new house is proposed on an extremely small or narrow lot where it is impractical to meet all of the applicable development standards, then a Variance could be granted to reduce the setback requirements to provide relief from the physical constraints on the property. Moreover, since building a house on a residentially zoned property is a land use right under most circumstances, the granting of a Variance would be appropriate in such a situation. For this project, a Variance is requested to allow two driveways to provide access to the two garages located on the opposite sides of the house. The Development Code permits two drive approaches on a single-family residential lot only in conjunction with a PL 2012-399 PAGE 6 OF 11 circular driveway. However, the subject property is physically constrained in such a manner that the creation of a functional circular drive is not feasible, and the limited options for reconfiguring the placement of the garaged spaces would have an undesirable aesthetic result. The basis for the positive variance findings contained in the attached resolution is provided in the discussion below. Need for a Four -Car Garage The Country is characterized by very large estate homes with multiple bedrooms, and sometimes with servants' quarters. For homes of this size, additional garage space, beyond the minimum two -car requirement in the Development Code, is appropriate and necessary. Moreover, staff has been advised that The Country's bylaws require new and enlarged homes to provide parking beyond the minimum code requirement. In light of these factors, staff does not consider it appropriate or advisable to require the applicant to reduce the square footage of the proposed house (which, as proposed, is modest for a new custom home in The Country), or to reduce the number of garaged parking spaces. Curvature of the Property Frontage A portion of the Rusty Pump Road cul-de-sac bulb cuts into the subject property frontage, creating an irregular front setback line. Moreover, as a lot at the end of a cul- de-sac, the subject property is wedge shaped with the side lot lines splayed out at a 50 -degree angle. A circular driveway typically features parallel driveway approaches and maneuverable turning radii. In this situation, the two driveway approaches radiate outward, following the curvatures of the roadway frontage. The acuteness of the angle between the side property lines, together with the building being set close to the minimum setback line due to site topography (see further discussion below) creates a constricted front yard area in which to provide the necessary driveway space. The result of these geometric constraints is that there is no space in which to construct a circular drive with a wide enough arc or turning radii to be functional. As a result, the more feasible solution is to provide a dedicated driveway for each garage. Irregular Topography The subject property has a 37.5% average natural descending slope and irregular topography. The substantially steep slope of the property starts within the private street easement towards the front of the property. General Plan Objective 1.2, Strategy 1.2.3 (c) requires existing residential areas to be preserved and maintained by "minimizing grading to retain natural vegetation and topography." If the site is designed with the building farther away from the street, in order to accommodate a circular driveway, the project would require more grading than what is currently proposed. There would be more manufactured slopes with retaining walls in order to shift the terraced building pads rearward. Moreover, since there is a Flood Hazard easement traversing the PAGE 7 OF 11 PL 2012-399 center of the lot, taller retaining walls may be necessary to avoid encroaching into the easement (the Development Code limits the exposed heights of terraced retaining walls to four feet). As proposed, even with the terracing of the building pads, a substantial amount of soil import is needed,to create a buildable site. Finally, extending the limits of grading farther toward the rear of the property would require the removal of protected trees and habitat; currently, no protected trees are in jeopardy, and only limited, non - jurisdictional habitat is proposed to be removed to accommodate the proposed development. In light of these factors, staff does not find it reasonable or feasible to increase the front setback simply to accommodate a circular driveway. Functionalitv and Aesthetics As discussed, four garaged parking spaces are warranted for this project. The architect's design solution to this challenge is to split these spaces into two separate garages and to place them on the opposite sides of the house. There are, of course other ways to provide four garaged spaces that would avoid the need for two driveways. One is to provide a tandem garage. The challenge in doing so, however, is that the house is designed within a fairly compact and shallow footprint to minimize its encroachment the steeply descending slope that characterizes the subject property. The floor plan is efficiently laid out with the utilitarian components, such as the staircases and elevator (and garage spaces) placed on the sides of the house so that usable living space can be more centralized and contiguous. Introducing tandem parking spaces would require the relocation of one stairway, and disrupt both the efficiency of the layout, and the contiguity of the usable living areas. Another alternative is to consolidate the garage spaces into a four -car, non -tandem garage. Such a four -car garage would have to be front -loaded (i.e. facing the street) because of the shape and topography of the lot. Given the narrowness of the street frontage, such a design would result in a garage -dominated facade, and thereby diminish the aesthetics of the property as viewed from the street. Although the City's Development Code and Design Guidelines do not expressly discourage designs with garage -dominated facades, it has been the past practice of the City to avoid garage - dominated architecture during the residential design review process. Taking all of the above factors into account, staff believes that providing access to the garages via two separated driveways is an appropriate design solution given the circumstances particular to the subject property Compliance with Hillside Management Ordinance (DBMC Section 22.22) The proposed project was reviewed for compliance with the City's Hillside Management Design Guidelines and regulations. DBMC Section 22.22.120 (a)(1) establishes a height limit of 35 feet as measured from the finished grade to the highest point of the roofline. The project demonstrates that the proposed building will be 35' at the highest point. The project complies with all of the regulations and guidelines to ensure that PL 2012-399 - PAGE 8 OF 11 development will complement the character and topography of hillside areas set forth in the Development Code. The project site was designed with: • Avoid any excessive cantilevers on downhill elevations; • All proposed retaining walls associated with the building pad are at a maximum exposed height of four feet; • Utilization of below grade rooms (basement level) to reduce effective bulk and to provide energy efficient and environmentally desired space; • Split pads are used to step up the natural slope; and • Earth tone building materials and color schemes are used that blend in with the natural landscape. The, project is terraced on five pad levels. From street view, the building has appearance of a single -story structure but the rear of the building steps down to two lower building pads. The lowest pad includes a fountain and fire pit. The project complies with all of the regulations and guidelines to ensure that .development will complement the character and topography of hillside areas set forth in the Development Code. Compatibility with Neighborhood The proposed project complies with the goals and objectives as set forth in the adopted General Plan in terms of land use and density. The project is designed to be compatible with and enhance the character of the eclectic neighborhoods in The Country Estates. The project incorporates the principles of the City's Residential Design Guidelines as follows: • The proposed new single family residence will conform to all development standards, including building height and setbacks, which is consistent with other homes in the Country Estates; • A transition between the project and adjacent properties is achieved through appropriate setbacks, building height, landscaping, and window and door placement; The proposed new single family residence is appropriate in mass and scale to the site; • Elevations are treated with detailed architectural elements; • Roof lines are representative of the design and scale of the structure; PL 2012-399 PAGE 9 OF 11 Placement and relationship of windows, doors, and other window openings are carefully integrated with the building's overall design; Large wall expanses lacking appropriate relief are avoided; and Landscaping is used to emphasize and highlight focal points such as gardens, patios and walkways, as well as to create a transition between the hard vertical edges of the structure and the softer horizontal lines of the site. Adjacent Property to South Additional Review Project Site Adjacent Property to North The Public Works Department and Building and Safety Division reviewed this project, and their comments are included in the attached resolution as conditions of approval. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: On September 13, 2013, public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 1,000 -foot radius of the project site and the notice was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers. A notice display board was posted at the site, and a copy of the notice was posted at the City's three designated community posting sites. Public Comments Received At the time the staff report was published, staff had not received any comments from the public. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: This project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on that assessment, the City has determined the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to the provisions of PL 2012-399 PAGE 10 OF 11 Article 19 Section 15303 (a) (Construction of a New Single Family Residence) of the CEQA Guidelines. No further environmental review is required. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution (Attachment 1) approving Development Review and Variance No. PL 2012-399, to construct a new single-family residence and to allow two driveways in the front yard based on the findings of DBMC Section 22.48 and 22.54, subject to conditions of approval as listed within the draft resolution. Prepared by: Natalie Tobon Assistant Planner Attachments: Reviewed by: 94 i - Gr Lee Senior Planner 1. Draft Resolution No. 2013 -XX and Standard Conditions of Approval 2. Site Plan, Floor Plans, Elevations, Landscape Plans, and Grading Plans PAGE 11 OF 11 PL 2012-399 Attachment 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -XX A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND VARIANCE NO. PL2012-399 TO CONSTRUCT A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE CONSISTING OF 8,063 SQUARE FEET OF LIVING SPACE AND 1,000 SQUARE FEET OF GARAGE SPACE; AND A VARIANCE TO ALLOW TWO DRIVEWAYS IN THE FRONT YARD ON A 5.57 GROSS ACRE (242,628 SQUARE -FOOT) LOT LOCATED AT 2205 RUSTY PUMP ROAD, DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 (APN 8713-034-017). A. RECITALS 1. The property owners, Sandeep and Anju Shah, and applicant, Rick Dirksen, have filed an application for Development Review and Variance No. PL2012-399 to construct a new single-family residence consisting of a 3,193 square -foot first story (ground level); 3,358 square -foot mid level; 1,512 square -foot basement floor; and 1,000 square feet of garage space, and a Variance application to allow two driveways in the front yard, located at 2205 Rusty Pump Road, City of Diamond Bar, County of Los Angeles, California. Hereinafter in this resolution, the subject Development Review shall collectively be referred to as the "Project." 2. The subject property is made up of one parcel totaling 242,628 square feet (5,57 gross acres). It is located in the Rural Residential (RR) zone with an underlying General Plan land use designation of Rural Residential. 3. The legal description of the subject property is Lot 43 of Tract 23483, The Assessor's Parcel Number is 8713-034-017. 4. On September 13, 2013, notification of the public hearing for this project was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers. Public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 1,000 -foot radius of the Project site and public notices were posted at the City's designated community posting sites on September 13, 2013. In addition to the published and mailed notices, the project site was posted with a display board and the notice was posted at three other locations within the project vicinity. 5. On September 24, 2013, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing, solicited testimony from all interested individuals, and concluded said hearing on that date. B. RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: 1. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct; and 2. The Planning Commission hereby determines the Project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to the provisions of Article 19, Section 15303 (a) (Construction of a New Single Family Residence) of the CEQA Guidelines. Therefore, no further environmental review is required. C. FINDINGS OF FACT Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein and as prescribed under Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Section 22.48, this Planning Commission hereby finds as follows: Development Review Findings (DBMC Section 22.48.040) 1. The design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with the applicable elements of the City's General Plan, City Design Guidelines, and development standards of the applicable district, design guidelines, and architectural criteria for special areas (e.g., theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards or planned developments); The design and layout of the proposed 8,063 square -foot single-family residence and 1,000 square feet of garage space is consistent with the City's General Plan, City Design Guidelines and development standards by meeting all of the setbacks and requirements of the City's development code. The house incorporates various details such as sand finish stucco, low pitched roof lines, and appropriate massing to meet the intent of the City's Design Guidelines. In addition, appropriate screening and integration of the home to the natural environment is accomplished by providing a variety of groundcover, shrubs, and trees throughout the site. The project site is not part of any theme area, specific plan, community plan, boulevard or planned development. 2. The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards; The proposed single-family residence will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments because the use of the project site is designed for a single-family home and the surrounding uses are also single-family homes. The proposed single-family home will not interfere with vehicular or pedestrian movements, such as access or other functional requirements of a single-family home because it complies with the requirements for driveway widths and grades. 2 DR IVAR NO. PL2012-399 3. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain and enhance the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22.48: Development Review Standards, the City's Design Guidelines, the City's General Plan, or any applicable specific plan; The subject property is located within the Diamond Bar Country Estates ("The Country'g. The new single-family home is designed to be compatible with the character of the eclectic neighborhoods in The Country. The design is modern with influences from Prairie architecture, including features such as low pitched hipped roof, large grouped windows, and integration with the natural landscape. In addition, complementary wall materials are used to distinguish breaks in plane and add articulation to maintain and enhance the harmonious development in the neighborhood. 4. The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, color, and will remain aesthetically appealing; The design of the new single-family home is modern with influences from Prairie architecture. Variation in the building elements has been achieved through the utilization of attractive architectural features, building materials, and landscaping. Earth -tone shades for the exterior finish are used to soften the building's visual impact and assist in preserving the hillside's aesthetic value. Also, landscaping is integrated into the site to complement the streetscape in order to maintain a desirable environment. 5. The proposed development will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious (e.g., negative effect on property values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity; and Before the issuance of any City permits, the proposed project is required to comply with all conditions within the approved resolution, and the Building and Safety Division and Public Works Departments requirements. Through the permit and inspection process, the referenced agencies will ensure that the proposed project is not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. 6. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as set forth under Article 19 Section 15303 (a) (Construction of a New Single Family Residence) of the CEQA guidelines. 3 DR/ VAR NO. PLM2-399 Variance Findings (DBMC Section 22.54.040) 1. There are special circumstances applicable to the property (e.g., location, shape, size, surroundings, topography, or other conditions), so that the strict application of this Development Code denies the property owner privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zoning districts or creates an unnecessary, and non -self-created, hardship or unreasonable regulation which makes it obviously impractical to require compliance with the development standards; Approval of the Variance is appropriate due to special circumstances applicable to the property, based on the following facts and observations: A. Need for a Four -Car Garage — The Country is characterized by very large estate homes with multiple bedrooms, and sometimes with servants' quarters. For homes of this size, additional garage space, beyond the minimum two -car requirement in the Development Code, is appropriate and necessary. In light of these factors, it would not be appropriate or advisable to require a reduction in square footage or in the number of garaged parking spaces. B. Curvature of the Property Frontage — A portion of the Rusty Pump Road cul- de-sac bulb cuts into the subject property frontage, creating an irregular front setback line. Moreover, as a lot at the end of a cul-de-sac, the subject property is wedge shaped with the side lot lines splayed out at a 50 -degree angle. A circular driveway typically features parallel driveway approaches and maneuverable turning radii. With the subject property, the two driveway approaches radiate outward, following the curvatures of the roadway frontage. The acuteness of the angle between the side property lines, together with the building being set close to the minimum setback line due to site topography (discussed below) creates a constricted front yard area in which to provide the necessary driveway space. The result of these geometric constraints is that there is no space in which to construct a circular drive with a wide enough arc or turning radii to be functional. As a result, the more feasible solution is to provide a dedicated driveway for each garage. C. Irregular Topography — The subject property has a 37.5% average natural descending slope and irregular topography. The substantially steep slope of the property starts within the private street easement towards the front of the property. General Plan Objective 1.2, Strategy 1.2.3 (c) requires existing residential areas to be preserved and maintained by "minimizing grading to retain natural vegetation and topography." If the site is designed with the building farther away from the street, in order to accommodate a circular driveway, the project would require more grading than what is currently proposed. There would be more manufactured slopes with retaining walls in order to shift the terraced building pads rearward. Moreover, since there is 4 DR / VAR NO. PL2012-599 a Flood Hazard easement traversing the center of the lot, taller retaining walls may be necessary to avoid encroaching into the easement (the Development Code limits the exposed heights of terraced retaining walls to four feet). As proposed, even with the terracing of the building pads, a substantial amount of soil import is needed to create a buildable site. Finally, extending the limits of grading farther toward the rear of the property would require the removal of protected trees and habitat; currently, no protected trees are in jeopardy, and only limited, non -jurisdictional habitat is proposed to be removed to accommodate the proposed development. In light of these factors, it is not reasonable or feasible to increase the front setback to accommodate a circular driveway. D. Aesthetics — As discussed in Variance Finding 1.A., four garaged parking spaces are warranted for this project. The architect's design solution to this challenge is to split these spaces into two separate garages and to place. them on the opposite sides of the house. While there are other ways to provide four garaged spaces that would avoid the need for two driveways, they are fraught with undesirable consequences. One design alternative is to provide a tandem garage. However, due to the steeply descending slope on the subject property, the proposed house has been designed within a fairly compact and shallow footprint to minimize encroachment into the slope. The floor plan is efficiently laid out with the utilitarian components, such as the staircases and elevator (and garage spaces) placed on the sides of the house so that usable living space can be more centralized and contiguous. Introducing tandem parking spaces would require the relocation of at least one stairway, and disrupt both the efficiency of the layout, and the contiguity of the usable living areas. Another alternative is to consolidate the garage spaces into a four -car, non - tandem garage. Because of shape and topography of the subject property, the four -car garage would have to be front -loaded (i.e. facing the street). Given the narrowness of the street frontage, such a design would result in a garage -dominated facade, and thereby diminish the aesthetics of the property as viewed from the street. Although the City's Development Code and Design Guidelines do not expressly discourage designs with garage - dominated facades, it has been the past practice of the City to avoid garage - dominated architecture during the residential design review process. Taking all of the above factors into account, providing access to the garages via two separated driveways is an appropriate design solution given the circumstances particular to the subject property. 2. Granting the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other property owners .in the same vicinity and zoning district and denied to the property owner for which the variance is sought; By granting the variance, the property owner of the subject property will be able to preserve and enjoy the same property rights possessed by other property 5 DRI VAR NO. PL2012-399 owners in the same vicinity and zoning district by allowing the property owner to construct a garage that complies with The Country Estate's garage requirements. 3. Granting the variance is consistent with the general plan and any applicable specific plan; The variance is consistent with General Plan Objective 1.2, Strategy 1.2.3 (c) which states that it shall be City policy to `maintain residential areas which protect natural resources, hillsides, and scenic areas" by "minimizing grading to retain natural vegetation and topography." If the site is designed to be farther away from the front property, the project would require more grading than what is proposed in order to create a larger building pad with more manufactured slopes and retaining walls. The site is not located within a specific plan area. 4, The proposed entitlement would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the city; and If the variance is approved, the construction and grading of the driveways and associated retaining walls would be subject to review and approval by the Public Works/Engineering Department and the Building and Safety Division. The proposed entitlement has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as set forth under Article 19 Section 15303 (a) (Construction of a New Single Family Residence) of the CEQA guidelines. The approval of the variance is subject to such conditions as will assure that it does not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated. The City's Rural Residential (RR) zone is confined to, and is comprised entirely, properties within the guard -gated boundaries of The Country. As stated in Variance Finding 1.A., development within The Country is characterized by estate properties with large homes (frequently exceeding the size of the home proposed in conjunction with this variance request), and these homes typically have garage space to accommodate four or more vehicles. The granting of this variance request serves merely as a reasonable accommodation to allow the subject property—given its site-specific physical constraints—to be developed with improvements that are consistent with existing homes within The Country/RR zoning district. The granting of the variance will not exempt the subject property from any zoning regulations that limit the use and enjoyment of other properties in the The Country/RR zoning district. 6 OR / VAR NO. PL2012399 Based upon the findings and conclusion set forth above, the Planning Commission hereby approves this Application, subject to the following conditions: 1. Development shall substantially comply with the plans and documents presented to the Planning Commission at the public hearing. 2. Prior to building permit issuance, the required landscape plan shall be designed to meet the requirements of the Los Angeles County Fire Department's Fuel Modification Plan Guidelines in terms of plant selection, placement and maintenance. The final landscape and fuel modification plans shall be submitted to the Los Angeles Fire Department for review and approval. 3. Prior to building permit issuance, landscape and irrigation plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City's Consulting Landscape Architect and shall comply with the Water Conservation Landscaping Ordinance. 4. Standard Conditions. The applicant shall comply with the standard development conditions attached hereto. The Planning Commission shall: a. Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and b. Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail to the property owners, Sandeep and Anju Shah, 6397 Rhodes Lane, Riverside, CA 92506; and applicant, Rick Dirksen, 9461 Hughes Drive, Corona, CA 92883. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2013, BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. Tony Torng, Vice Chairman I, Greg Gubman, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of September, 2013, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: ABSTAIN: Commissioners: ATTEST: Greg Gubman, Secretary 7 DRI VAR NO. PL2012-399 --� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS USE PERMITS, COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL NEW AND REMODELED STRUCTURES PROJECT #: Development Review and Variance No. PL 2012-399 SUBJECT: To construct a new single family residence consisting of 8,063 square feet of living space and 1,000 square feet of garage space: and Variance to allow two driveways in the front yard. PROPERTY Sandeep and Anju Shah OWNER(S): 6397 Rhodes Lane Riverside, CA 92506 APPLICANT: Rick Dirksen 9461 Hughes Drive Corona, CA 92883 LOCATION: 2205 Rusty Pump Road, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION AT (909) 839-7030, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. In accordance with Government Code Section 66474.9(b)(1), the applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, and its officers, agents and employees, from any claim, action, or proceeding to attack, set-aside, void or annul, the approval of Development Review and Variance No. PL2012-399 brought within the time period provided by Government Code Section 66499.37. In the event the city and/or its officers, agents and employees are made a party of any such action: 8 DR / VAR NO. PL2012.399 (a) Applicant shall provide a defense to the City defendants or at the City's option reimburse the City its costs of defense, including reasonable attorneys fees, incurred in defense of such claims. (b) Applicant shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against the City defendants. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action of proceeding, and shall cooperate fully in the defense thereof. 2. This approval shall not be effective for any purpose until the applicant and owner of the property involved have filed, within twenty-one (21) days of approval of this Development Review and Variance No. PL2012-399, at the City of Diamond Bar Community Development Department, their affidavit stating that they are aware of and agree to accept all the conditions of this approval. Further, this approval shall not be effective until the applicants pay remaining City processing fees, school fees and fees for the review of submitted reports. 3. All designers, architects, engineers, and contractors associated with this project shall obtain a Diamond Bar Business License; and a zoning approval for those businesses located in Diamond Bar. 4. Signed copies of Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013 -XX, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 5. Prior to the plan check, revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval. 6. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval shall be completed. 7. The project site shall be maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of approval and all laws, or other applicable regulations. 8. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and any applicable Specific Plan in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 9. All site, grading, landscape/irrigation, and roof plans, and elevation plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of City permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.,) or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 10. The property owner/applicant shall remove the public hearing notice board within three days of this project's approval. 9 DR / VAR NO. PL2012-399 11. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of City Planning, Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works Department, and the Fire Department. B. FEES/DEPOSITS 1. Applicant shall pay development fees (including but not limited to Planning, Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works Department and Mitigation Monitoring) at the established rates, prior to issuance of building or grading permit (whichever comes first), as required by the City. Schobl fees as required shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permit. In addition, the applicant shall pay all remaining, prorated City project review and processing fees prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever comes first. 2. Prior to any plan check, all deposit accounts for the processing of this project shall have no deficits. C. TIME LIMITS 1. The approval of Development Review and Variance No. PL2012-399 expires within two years from the date of approval if the use has not been exercised as defined per Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Section 22.66.050 (b)(1). The applicant may request in writing a one year time extension subject to DBMC Section 22.60.050(c) for Planning Commission approval. D. SITE DEVELOPMENT 1. The project site shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the approved plans submitted to, approved, and amended herein by the Planning Commission, collectively attached referenced as site plans, floor plans, architectural elevations, and landscape plans on file with the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 2. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, air conditioning condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berms, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Division. 3. All roof -mounted equipment shall be screened from public view. 4. All structures, including walls, trash enclosures, canopies, etc., shall be maintained in a structurally sound, safe manner with a clean, orderly appearance. All graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours by the property owners/occupant. 5. All landscaping, structures, architectural features and public improvements damaged during construction shall be repaired or replaced upon project completion. 10 DR / VAR NO. PL2012-799 E. SOLID WASTE 1. The site shall be maintained in a condition, which is free of debris both during and after the construction, addition, or implementation of the entitlement approved herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether during or subsequent to construction shall be done only by the property owner, applicant or by a duly permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste from residential, commercial, construction, and industrial areas within the City. It shall be the applicant's obligation to insure that the waste contractor used has obtained permits from the City of Diamond Bar to provide such services. 2. Mandatory solid waste disposal services shall be provided by the City franchised waste hauler to all parcels/lots or uses affected by approval of this project. F. FIRE PROTECTION STANDARDS 1. Development shall be constructed to reduce the potential for spread of brushfire. a. In the case of a conflict, where more restrictive provisions are contained in the Uniform Building Code or in"the fire code, the more restrictive provisions shall prevail. b. Roofs shall be covered with noncombustible materials as defined in the building code. Open eave ends shall be stopped in order to prevent bird nests or other combustible material lodging within the roof and to preclude entry of flames. C. Exterior walls shall be surfaced with noncombustible or fire-resistant materials. d. Balconies, patio roofs, eaves and other similar overhangs shall be of noncombustible construction or shall be protected by fire-resistant material in compliance with the building code. 2. All development shall be constructed with adequate water supply and pressure for all proposed development in compliance with standards established by the fire marshal. 3. A permanent fuel modification area shall be required around development projects or portions thereof that are adjacent or exposed to hazardous fire areas for the purpose of fire protection. The required width of the fuel modification area shall be based on applicable building and fire codes and a fire hazard analysis study developed by the fire marshal. In the event abatement is not performed, the council may instruct the fire marshal to give notice to the owner 11 OR 1 VAR NO. PL2012399 of the property upon which the condition exists to correct the prohibited condition. If the owner fails to correct the condition, the council may cause the abatement_ to be performed and make the expense of the correction a lien on the property upon which the conditions exist. 4. Fuel modification areas shall incorporate soil erosion and sediment control measures to alleviate permanent scarring and accelerated erosion. 5. If the fire marshal determines in any specific case that difficult terrain, danger of erosion, or other unusual circumstances make strict compliance with the clearance of vegetation undesirable or impractical, the fire marshal may suspend enforcement and require reasonable alternative measures designed to advance the purposes of this chapter. 6. Special construction features may be required in the design of structures where site investigations confirm potential geologic hazards. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, (909) 839-7040, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. GENERAL 1. An Erosion Control Plan shall be submitted concurrently with the grading plan clearly detailing erosion control measures. These measures shall be implemented during construction. The erosion control plan shall conform to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards and incorporate the appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP's) as specified in the Storm Water BMP Certification. For construction activity which disturbs one acre or greater soil a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be needed. 2. The applicant shall comply with the newly adopted 2012 MS4 Permit requirements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 3. Grading and construction activities and the transportation of equipment and materials and operation of heavy grading equipment shall be limited to between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. Dust generated by grading and construction activities shall be reduced by watering the soil prior to and during the activities and in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 402 and Rule 403. Reclaimed water shall be used whenever possible. Additionally, all construction equipment shall be properly muffled to reduce noise levels. B. SOILS REPORT/GRADING/RETAINING WALLS 1. Prior to grading plan submittal, a geotechnical report prepared by a Geotechnical Engineer, licensed by the State of California, shall be submitted by the applicant for approval by the Public Works/Engineering Department. 12 DR I VAR NO. PL2012-399 2. Upon approval of the geotechnical report, the applicant shall submit drainage and grading plans prepared by a Civil Engineer, licensed by the State of California, prepared in accordance with the City's requirements for the City's review and approval. A list of requirements for grading plan check is available from the Public Works Department. All grading (cut and fill) calculations shall be submitted to the City concurrently with the grading plan. 3. Finished slopes shall conform to City Code Section 22.22.080 -Grading. 4. All easements and flood hazard areas shall be clearly identified on the grading plan. 5. The grading plan shall show the location of any retaining walls and the elevations of the top of wall/footing/retaining and the finished grade on both sides of the retaining wall. Construction details for retaining walls shall be shown on the grading plan. Calculations and details of retaining walls shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for review and approval. 6. All equipment staging areas shall be located on the project site. Staging area, including material stockpile and equipment storage area, shall be enclosed within a six foot -high chain link fence. All access points in the defense shall be locked whenever the construction site is not supervised. 7. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the California Building Code, City Grading Ordinance, Hillside Management Ordinance and acceptable grading practices. 8. All slopes shall be seeded per landscape plan and/or fuel modification plan with native grasses or planted with ground cover, shrubs, and trees for erosion control upon completion of grading or some other alternative method of erosion control shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and a permanent irrigation system shall be installed. 9. Submit a stockpile plan showing the proposed location for stockpile for grading export materials, and the route of transport. 10. A pre -construction meeting shall be held at the project site with the grading contractor, applicant, civil engineer, geotechnical engineer and city grading inspector at least 48 hours prior to commencing grading operations. 11. Rough grade certifications by project soils and civil engineers and the as - graded geotechnical report shall be submitted for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits for the foundation of the residential structure. Retaining wall permits may be issued concurrently with the grading permit. 13 DR IVAR NO. PL2012-399 12. Final grade certifications by project soils and civil engineers shall be submitted to the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of any project final inspections/certificate of occupancy respectively. C. DRAINAGE 1. Detailed drainage system information of the lot with careful attention to any flood hazard area shall be submitted. All drainage/runoff from the development shall be conveyed from the site to the natural drainage course. No on-site drainage shall be conveyed to adjacent parcels; unless that is the natural drainage course. 2. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a complete hydrology and hydraulic study shall be prepared by a Civil Engineer registered in the State of California to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Los Angeles Public Works Department. D. UTILITIES 1. Underground utilities shall not be constructed within the drip line of any mature tree except as approved by a registered arborist. E. SEWERS/SEPTIC TANK 1. Applicant, at applicant's sole cost and expense, shall construct the sewer system in accordance with the City Building and Safety Division. Connection permits to the sewer mainline shall be obtained from the Public Works Department. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 839-7020, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Plans shall conform to State and Local Building Code (i.e., 2010 California Building Code, California Plumbing Code, California Mechanical Code, and the California Electrical Code if obtained prior to 2014, the 2013 if obtained on or after January 1, 2014) requirements and all other applicable construction codes, ordinances and regulations in effect at the time of plan check submittal. 2. Provisions for Cal Green shall be implemented onto plans and certification provided by a third party as required by the Building Division. Specific water, waste, low VOC, and related conservation measures shall be shown on plans. 3. Fire sprinklers are required for new single family dwellings (CRC R313.2). 4. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been met. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 14 DR I VAR NO. PL2612-399 5. Every permit issued by the Building and Safety Division shall expire if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit or work has discontinued and not been signed -off on the job card by the building inspector. 6. Construction activities causing the operation of any tools or equipment used in construction, drilling, repair, alteration, or demolition work shall be conducted Monday — Saturday between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. 7. The project shall be protected by a construction fence to the satisfaction of the Building Official. 8. All structures and property shall be maintained in a safe and clean manner during construction. The property shall be free of debris, trash, and weeds. 9. All equipment staging areas shall be maintained in an orderly manner and screened behind a minimum 6' high fence. 10. Solid waste management of construction material shall incorporate recycling material collection per Diamond Bar Municipal Code 8.16 of Title 8. 11. The minimum design load for wind in this area is 85 M.P.H. exposures "C" and the site is within seismic zone D or E. The applicant shall submit drawings and calculations prepared by a California State licensed Architect/Engineer with wet stamp and signature. 12. This project shall comply with the energy conservation requirements of the State of California Energy Commission. All lighting shall be high efficacy or equivalent per the current California Energy Code 119 and 150(k). 13. Indoor air quality shall be provided consistent with ASHRAE 62.2 as required per California Energy Code 150(o). 14. Only one single family dwelling per CBC 202 is allowed on this property unless specifically approved otherwise. 15. All site areas occurring at walking surfaces (including top tiers of retaining walls) that have a drop of over 30' shall be provided with a guardrail per CBC 1013 and a handrail is required at all steps/stairs with 4 or more risers and shall meet CBC 1012. 16. Submit Public Works Department approved grading plans showing clearly all finish elevations, drainage, and retaining walls locations. 17. "Separate permits are required for pool, spa, sport court, fountains, outdoor kitchen, outdoor fireplace, retaining walls, and fences over 6' in height" and shall be noted on plans. 15 DR/ VAR NO. PL2912-399 18. A height and setback survey may be required at completion of framing and foundations respectively. 19. Prior to Building permit issuance, all school district fees must be paid. Please obtain a form from the Building and Safety Division to take directly to the school district. 20. All balconies shall be designed for 601b. live load. 21. Guardrails shall be designed for 20 load applied laterally at the top of the rail. 22. Indicate all easements on the site plan. 23. Fire Department approval shall be required. Contact the Fire Department to check the fire zone for the location of your property. If this project is located in High Hazard Fire Zone it shall meet of requirements of the fire zone per CBC Chapter 7A. a. All unenclosed under -floor areas shall be constructed as exterior wall. b. All openings into the attic, floor and/or other enclosed areas shall be covered with corrosion -resistant wire mesh not less than 1/4 inch or more than 1/2 inch in any dimension except where such openings are equipped with sash or door. c. Eaves shall be protected. No 2x members allowed unless they meet heavy - timber requirements. d. Exterior construction shall be one-hour or non-combustible. e. Fuel modification plans shall be approved through LA County Fire Fuel Modification Unit. 24. All retaining walls shall be submitted to the Building and Safety and Public Work Departments for review and approval. 25. Submit grading plans showing clearly all finish elevations, drainage, and retaining wall locations. No building permits shall be issued prior to submitting a pad certification. 26. The project shall be protected by a construction fence and shall comply with the NPDES & BMP requirements (sand bags, etc.) 27. Check drainage patterns with Engineering Department. Surface water shall drain away from building at a 2% minimum slope. 28. Specify location of tempered glass as required by code. 29. Specify 1/4"/ft slope for all flat surfaces/ decks with approved water proofing material. Also, provide guardrail connection detail (height, spacing, etc.) 16 DR / VAR NO. PL2012-399 30. Private property sewer/septic system shall be approved by the Los Angeles County Health Department and the California Water Control Board. 31. Bodies of water that are greater than 18" in depth shall have the required barriers to prevent unintentional access per CBC 3904.4. 32. Special inspections and structural observation will be required in conformance to CBC 1704 to 1709. 33. A soils report is required and all recommendations of the soils report shall be adhered to. 34. Slope setbacks consistent with California Building Code Figure 1805.3.1 and California Residential Code R403.1.7. Foundations shall provide a minimum distance to daylight. 35. The applicant shall contact Dig Alert and have underground utility locations marked by the utility companies prior to any excavation. Contact Dig Alert by dialing 811 or their website at www.di.galert.org. 36. The location of property lines and building pad may require a survey. 37. AQMD notification is required at least 10 days prior to any demolition. 38. All workers on the job shall be covered by workman's compensation insurance under a licensed general contractor. 39. Any changes to approved plans during the course of construction shall be approved by the City prior to proceeding with any work. 40. Carbon monoxide detectors are required in halls leading to sleeping rooms per CRC R315. 41. All retaining walls shall be designed for surcharges from adjacent walls including sliding/passive resistance pressures from adjacent walls. 42. Any underfloor space not designated on plans as usable space shall not be modified to habitable space unless with proper plans, approvals, and permits from the Community Development Department. 43. Shafts shall be rated one-hour and openings protected including the elevator shaft. 44. The storage room on the mid-level between the master closet and office adjacent the game room shall be maintained as non -habitable unless a separate permit is obtained to modify to habitable space. 17 DR / VAR NO. PL2012-799 45. All sleeping rooms shall have a door or window to afford emergency egress per CRC R310. Where below grade, the window wells shall comply with CRC R310.2. 46. Sump pump design shall be done by a registered professional engineer or equivalent with appropriate calculations and pump design. 47. Retaining wall sliding/passive resistance surcharges shall be addressed in the retaining wall structural design or by the soils engineer. W ED 18 DR / VAR NO. PL2012-999 ` F 1. NL GRIWAG SHUT COMPLY WIN INE PROOPOOR, OF SECRP'I IBM NO DEPEND% J OF ME WMRIM BuROINC NDE (2010) ANO Au AVLNOYENLS AGonEB BY INE cv.. 2 ALL HILLSIDE 4R191NC AN SUPPLE IN MESS OF POT SHALL COOKY MIM FOIE ULSIDE WHMENEM 01MANCE AND SIiV111PMJLLY NOT CNCEEO 2:1. z No GRIJNNG SWLL WUMNCE POOL 4 BMDMC PERNB H45 SEEN WOW or IN£ Clry w NuGN;u B44. 1. ALL NLL SNPES SHIN SE NNPANFD HI NM ALTS RM 90 PEAVNi OF RHE NUIYUY OENSBY. a. SIIFFlCIFNI 1F515 OF sal PAVP%D INCLUDING NIL OPTS AND SHEAR SMENONS SIWL BE NNE WRING GRADING CPfENNWS ro 1EAIFY COYAUMET 'RN DEIGN CRUERN. ME RESULM OF SUCH IETNC SINLLBE REP0.41ED N THE MOL AS DIVIDED RENDRE (PREPARED BY INE APPLICANT AT H6 ENP£NSE), OR IMOD REQUEST W RHE WRY. A MWLVUH NWHR OF FlEID NMl1Y l(1T ME Til BE WLE AS ZLLtlAS A 0.VE 1FST IP2 fNYI iM)-FNi IiRIMN. UFT. ' 6. ONE TEST RR OO OF RIGH MANTES dUS TO V1 PUCFO. C A SUFFlCIFNI NUNBFA DE FlX6N SIA°E 1E5/5 TO VERIF( CWIPACIHRI 0£ WE SLOPE SURFACE B NO TO. SMALL BE PLACED UNIX SIMPRNG M WGETARGIC REMOVAL OF 1481TOME SANS, AND WRMARGH OF BOB~ OF NEEDED) S ANLPIED BY ME SNE FRAHM OR FMNNEERING GNLOGSE ]. NO FAL SOME BE PULED HART ME PIACPILNT OF FINLAND NMRJL WANRE FOR ME PROJECT 5 ACCEPIEO Or ME OW.. * ME UNDERSIGNED WL DRANGER HINE R' SEDANS NOT THEE PVNS WERE PMPARED By HIM OF ROGER N6 suwn45NIN AM TMT ME PIANS CONFORM M AN. PERAMW PROMMN5 OF SECTION 1603, UGAVAW. GINNING AND FAJ. AND APPENDIX J, GRAIM OF WE GI.NOMK 611N NDE (MV. 9. APPROVED PRGIEGTh'E WANRE AND IE PWRW DftVWCE PM1OOStlNs SNVL GE PRODDED TO P.wI AAgWNB PGOPWRE POOR DEPOSBATV OF OADE1NLL PP DA'£AIED FLOWS WM WRING ANO AFTER All PMSE OF NNSIWC(gN. IN ML WFAIE WP.PoWIENIS 6NNL BE NYPLE ED TO ME SANSFACDON OF ME CRY ENGMN. T. ROUGH GRADING CERNFEAE DUST BE WNW BY GOES IND CML ENGINO:RS OF RECORD AND AoPMNEU BY WE CRY DbPECIWt PRIOR IN IEWKE OF UURMNO "MRS. 12. ML CURS 9WL BE OBSERAD BY THE ENGWEBDNB GEaDG15T OF RECORD WRING 4RWAp SO MAT ANY ABhRSE DRAM. CW BE RGOOGN210 AND COM'IE0. 13 MY YWIFIGR0.45 N, OR COUNTS BE ME APPROAD GRNCVP PLANS DUST BE AWRO.eT BY WE NY. 14. All (AAOED SITS MUST HAVE NOMAGE SUMER, &'RMS AND OMEN GRMA6E OENCE APPROM AT ME RNOW NVDAYO STAGE. 15. NO ROCK G9 mnAV NAME GRGIFF MAY B- W DIAMETER WILL RE PLACED N WE FIT QN RECOYYENaRIWs NOR SIKH PAGEUw NOW BEA' SUMMER BY ME SOBS ENGINEER AND APPROVED M AwANCE BY WE CIII: 16. GROM a URNS DUST RE NNOMED OHM ME COIINNUMS 065FF'ABON LV ME EONS ENGINEER AND/OR ME ENGINEER GNIOGLST OF BEGUN) 17..6VIBKKIS M1% STAAw IRIS ANN REYwN OF WsI wMc Sets um BE o&GBRAO ANO GOE,ON M wupw BY ME SOILS ENGINEER NO FNNNEERPS: RGLNNOT or RE'WRD PPoGP TO WE PIAPJNO OF FNP is ME sous EAUNFER M'D/OR GONEEN .G GEULIX DE RETARD MUST GttwavT AND ADEPT FJUWI AS -GRA B( 6mT REPoM PflpF 10 .WF1'pVK BY ME CITY. ]NE FlI1LL flFPo.4f YUEf REOYDE AY AS -GRADED IXOIEdIMGL NM. 19. ME SOLE ENGINEER ANO/OR ENGMEERRIG GENDOST BF RECBR0 DUST WAEA FlNNNG IN ALNRNNCE IOM BECKON 11/ OF INE IDS IIIOBE L'WNTY BUIIDINC INCE TOR ME GMDEO 511E MR TO MPRwu BY INE W. 20. FORMATION AND/OR WNL UNOWNS HUET BE OBSERVED AND ANEPTEN W WRWAG BY ME MLS ENGINEER OR GGMEEWNG GENO ST W BELMO PRIOR IN PIAGNG SHR. OR EMMTE 21. A REGISTERED ME VAGOTEi 5'NLL SUBMIT A GRAOIw MENTG E TO ME GIr PAMPER No ANNE MW 10 WRONG DAPS UPON WYPLRKKI OF FNLL GRUNNG CPE NWOL ORNIGH OF ONUPNICT S'WL BE ISSUED 511B/ECT RI ME CITY ENONFEN5 A^PRwN OF SNO fNCJNEDti ORNICIIE FlNLL GN.V9NG MUST BE MPRAEO or THE = BEFORE 0.TUPANGY W' BNWNS ANAL BE MMAEV. 22. ME SONS AND GFMONT REPORT PREPARED BY aMEK WG AN NANO uuY 9P TG NN NL FEFERENCf➢ A4D RENf%FO RFPo.NEE LISPED REI SHAH. BEGONE A PMT Of MIS G44ONO PINI AND ALL REWNN81DMONS N AOBEG nBOux sHUt BE smmC ADNWfO ro. OXER REnENID MMM05 ME AN FGLLO XAAXXA MRAATOf ..cmmt 23. A RYT OF THE BWaNG PERON AND APPROVED GIVING PW15 MUST BE N B POSSESSION OF A RESPONW E HRSOE M9 AYNUAL AT ME MEAT" ROSS 24. FINAL CAAWAG OUST BE IPPROND BFfNLE OCOIPMGY OF MWINGS WILL BE ALLOMD. 25. MfSE PWEs INK BFOF CHECKED G( ME CITY CF OLWCND 8W PYLY fOR 031YOEM4Al"E iHIH olY STMBl40S GWIPLIWLY XiM DMIDPYEM CGYo11Ws N!0 FON GENERIC CMYFFRLLL APN.IYVN CF ME AWIil6F MO PMNWAY IOH,YMMENM SHJIFIf MEREAY NO pETIIIID WMAGIIGL CHECK WAS MY£ WR WE KpIRACY Y ME BOSOM PN PROPOSES WVENSNNS UHF, SEN GRADES BOOM MWIND AIL EMMAG UNDUE, SOON! OR NOT MOM 26. NNMGRM SIWL NOR%WE CBY ENGINEERS OflCf AT (809) 039-700 NM-6BM (41H DOORS IN ADVANCE W RRENBW TO GEGEN SMOG. 27. NMMGWR SAW. NNMY MM ME CWFORNA SOON WATER BEST RMADEADO PBACIkLS NMSENNYS AND ME PWXrS BOMBARD ARM SNR` ANAPEST DING AN PUN (8U8NP) REWIRd6RS AS NECESEWr 28. WREUT All ROORM RUNOFF TO PLAINS AREAS. 29. SUFBN6B TEA GF FEL EGYS SNHE BE DUDE WRRIG ME GRADING TO KAIET BAT THE GOES PROPERTIES MAY MTM ME DES40 RFWIREYIXI; AS DRERYINEB BY ME ENWNEERPG ISaWI4/GEMECHA1 fNON6R NCLUDDIO SOLE TIPS, SMAR ETFMA PARNENRS MD NWt6PoNOXG WIR WEIGHS M R-VNUE TESTS SHALL BE COMOMED FAR ALL PHELC AND PRWAR RDWHAY WPflOVENEWS M IWIR% WE WARN PAVEYEM SIRUCNML SECTION RfOUNLMENM PON ME SR[ WDbS MHEARES NOT REQUIRED BY ME W. 31. TYPE V GROW SNVL BE USED FOR ALL COGREE HOAK WWRC M OFETALT MIM WE GROUND, UNLESS MHEI ADDICTED B( ME PRTNECYB SOL MOVED O ER. PRECISE GRADING PLAN TRACT 23¢83, LOT 43 Call: TOLL FREE 1-800 227-2600 WD MOORS RAYS BEFORE YOU NG GBRUEE...... .__........... MNMMIURB W 90PE.... -- MMRHG N.WS................. GMJLNV S�AYIS PID IAEA ...................... RETAINING WALL NOTES: • iNl MiNWNG VLLLL FDIGNI$ IN'.11gN9. NIB N1A49 56 SPMS ]. A AW S O: E� 58d i PgGHO N.MP�GNDL I®m w1810T 1 iNC BENC HMARK:G. TV N NOMUB(X: MIXMA I YG9: Al 9JUN OANO 01EWr FASB Y` SP AI SDJIMAST 0.WIFR CF p+VA) At£ AM .RtlIWI GINE L EVA TION: 1161,69] R - NDONU GRWI9 fT = lP6wm flint R = PPoSI® 91fliN£ CL - CELIWINE iW =1W GF WNL IF =1W Or toTWc PSK -P OFNNL PSE - TBP Lf . SPEY f0011XG .p.- pEiWG PPGP. - iRM'Svn 1ST =1RMf VIC N17Y MAP BECKON ly T. 35. R 9TH' CITY OF DIAMOND BAR GENA MOEH NBT B£gYMD APP.PoYID B/: PUYIONG OEPARMEM DILE Attachment 2 OWNER SANDEEP SHAH 097 RH09ES WE W000E W 92506 /FL (809) 056-. DEVELOPER CDM DEVELOPMENT, INC. M34 E NIST HAY, SWR 436 CONGO OEL Y4N, G 92625 IEP' (696) 255-0.U9 ENGINEER ADKAN ENGINEERS sen "PORT nNNF R clOGK G RBAK SFL(951)(95!) 6%-M-OB41 9 M.0.59 SOILS ENGINEER GEOTEK. INC. 41.W FAT ROCK PTYE SURE140 . ww F vE.M. ) M 92505-5564 MY (95I) 7111677 PRLVFCT NO. 0767-CRJ _ TOPOGRAPHY ADKAN ENGINEERS M79 Afi R 0AGA7 MEF1CA 91504 M. (951) %-LL599 FAK (951) 6Y -0.f99 svR GU£ D6/T9/T01I ZONING EGmHc zoNMG: WRN xLE�Dr3mu. PMAVSLD ZORhY. R4WL F f LEGAL DESCRIPTION BEING LOT 43 OF TRACT 234&5 OF AAPS RECORDED IN BOOK 790, PAGES 5 THROUGH 19 OF A44PS, RECORDS OF ME COUNTY SURVEYOR OF LOS ANGELES COUW,, CAUFORNA SITE ADDRESS 5205 RAST` IVWP BDN O!U M W. G 9175 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER BnJ-M-017 EARTHWORK QUANTITY RAW DUANDRES corm.• 33 CX - HM- 5,340 CY. NET 6,307 C.Y. RLL ME a1WIIry SIpXN A6RE IS RM %WgNC W%g5II NIL`, SYRMKACG SIl85NgKE N!D SUBFALY [04 F/LIPRS ME AVT RV1ll09, Ilk" LYIHIRICICF 6 n GIRD M£ ryA]/FCT P£R PUN NiOOro P£F Mf64 ONN OPWNY YOE-Mi ' PROJECT NOTES TOM AGFA- 5,57 AM. TOTAL NSMRBED ANSI- Gsl w AVERAGE NATURAL SLOPE AVERAGE H1TUftlt SLOPE- 37.5E 24 HOUR EMERGENCY CONTACT TRACY TROY HL (919) 61P-SP15 BASIS OF BEARING SEMMES SHOWN HEREON AAE BASED UPON ME CENHAUNE OF RUSTY PUMP ROAD RFINC NORM 3V07'17' WEST AS SHOWN ON TRACT 234M OF MOPS FILED IN BOOK 79D, PAGE 5 THROUGH P9 IN THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STAGE OF GUFORNLA GRADING ACTIVITIES NOTE: GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION AGIMDES ANTE ME TRANSPORTATON OF HAW GRADING EQUIPMENT MD MATERVIS SHALL BE TOMO TO SLOWER ME HOURS OF 7:00 AN AND 5:OO PM, MONDAY THROUGH SATURDAY. OUST GENERATED BY GRADING AND CONSMUCTION ACIMIIES SHML BE REDUCED BY WATFORD THE SOIL PRIOR TO AND WRING WE MfRffHES IN ACCORDANCE WITH SOUTH COAST NR QRVNY MOAGEMEW DISMICT RULE 402 AND RULE 40.1, RECLNMED WATER SNNL BE USED WHENEVER POSSIBLE IN AOMRON, All CONSMU(MON EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PROPERLY MUFFLED TO REDUCE FIRE L£NES. SHEET INDEX I MDQ'YU. OMETUI HW6 2 GPAONG VEST 3 REDRAW NOT PAN 4 RFAMB AM SEORDOS 5 RETNMNP ML BECAME 6 REIN WNL acowns fR4WN CaBROL PLVI 0 DETM SHOT SHEET I OF 8 �m........................... o mE). WNJil491Wm L1 ............ aMI. .S ............. c F—y� �,lI]lIMM ft .............. mMG ........................... RETAINING WALL NOTES: •SE 31EElxe 3N Wars. La MH% MD M[ ROOM Em, !7cv REAR SETBACK NOTE: IN WPW. Y0 7 6UF F et• INE 4 "V "';;&ITC� SEE rURAL FLANS PRECISE GRADING PLAN TRACT 23483, LOT 43 N �k Y j N &—c. —a ,, sKvbs AlitC* 7OLL FRE ENOINEERS 217-20M "eqw 0 941F^Lw WE L EVA T/ 0 N: liomi ................. ........... . ......... . IF W"r.. . ............ I ...... . �:Ww� ............. ........... ........... — ......... ti RETAINING WM WALL NOTES- L=Tae:. w Mn . Z,- ro 20 =4LE, r CITY 01' DIAMOND BAR GRADING PLANS -PRECISE Pwxx::kx-x> GRADING -PLAN TRACT 23483, LOT 43 RETAINING WALL PLAN SHEET 3 orb WALL Rom. OCONTRACTOR TO FURNISH ANO INSTALL C SCHEA E 0 P.V.0 PERFORATED COLLECTOR PIPE (OR APPROVED MUMM.ENT). WAIL DEMME SYSTEM TO BE EGRET AT A MNOMUM SPACING OF too FEET, WAR A MINIMUM OF NO OUTLETS PER WALL SECTION. OWALL BAcKELL TO CONSIST MOSTLY OF MR& FNDH AND MUST CONFORM TO WE PRIMONS OUTLINED IN WE SDUS REPORT AND ADDENDUM LETTER. CONTRACTOR IS TO INSTALL 3/4 -INCH TO 1 -INCH CLEAN CRUSHED ROCK (Oft APPROVED EOUMALENf) FOR 1 FOOT IMMEDIATELY MMACENE TO THE BACK OF WAIL TO A DEPM OF I FOOT MOVE THE FOOTING (1CF/FT). OSTEEL REINFORCING BMS ME PERMITTED TO BE TERMINATED AT WE HEIGHT ABOVE MOTHS AND SPACING AS SHOWN ON WE PIANS. THIS CAN BE PERFORMED BY EITHER PIACING PREFORMFN FROM OF AN &TERNDING PATIEAN AND SPECIFIED LENGTH TO GOING WE HEIGHT AND SPACING SHOWN ON 11N PLANS OR HELD CUTTING EVERY OTHER OR EWRY THIRD REM (AS "MI ABEE) AT WE HEIGHT ABOVE FOOTING SHOWN ON PLANS. IF THE CONTRACTOR PROTEINS TO W THE BARS, MINIMUM W SPACE TURNS OF 54 INCHES. 45 INCHES ANO 36 INCHES AAE TO BE USED FOR 16, f5 PND f4 BAR ZAPS RESPECRAELY. DOCONTRACTOR TO FURNISH ANO INSTALL PREEMRRATED CEO-COMPOSOE BMKWUMN (MIRADWUN MOD OR APPROVED EOUM&EN71- THIS DEVICE IS TO HE INSTALLED PER THE MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATONS, SECURELY FASTENED TO THE RACK OF WALL AND FREE OF SEDIMENT ONCE PACIOTIL IS COMPI£TE Hori . hP• B' CMU SOLD GROUP rm- HOO,pM,,Fy- W Tai L s`Dpc 1� 'I � f fea )'-3° 05 O 4g Vad O Edga bwe $' fmm to 1 !Doti. C f5 X16' Ved O Edgo below 1]5' fmm Np of looli�g C bel 1.7T Gone top 9of footing SVOpEO 2.79" J6IO O Edge ' ti\ 5 O16 Vert 0 age ob 1.7 bova I]5'' Fmm to Of !Doli. C I —3' B' CMU SOLD GROM OB f6 O 16V5"e.-.- lEdge belowap of footing O __m= 1500 F w BE . I+.R/fb O fG WmM1 O ge O 24' H.Hx 1 � IDGROUT j S' CMU S�24%�" —1' --j/ e' CMU SOLD GRO rma fma oPE ®5 O W' Ved O Edye hp. 1!i9 fmm W � f fea )'-3° 05 O 4g Vad O Edga bwe $' fmm to 1 !Doti. C f5 X16' Ved O Edgo below 1]5' fmm Np of looli�g C bel 1.7T Gone top 9of footing SVOpEO 2.79" J6IO O Edge ' ti\ 5 O16 Vert 0 age ob 1.7 bova I]5'' Fmm to Of !Doli. C I —3' B' CMU SOLD GROM OB f6 O 16V5"e.-.- lEdge belowap of footing MIN, m 14 0 M'O.C. __m= 1500 F w BE . I+.R/fb O fG WmM1 O ge O 24' H.Hx 1 � IDGROUT j S' CMU S�24%�" t�WALL Al p f4 0 16-O.U. 14 0 24b.C. (AS SHOWN) 9' MIN. 1 �- f3' CTR. • `f4 0 IS-= 7.5' MIN. Im - 14 0 24°0.C. (AS SHOWN) I�fS. GTE'. -DIST. CL -CL )'� ®5 O W' Ved O Edye hp. 1!i9 fmm W � f fea )'-3° 05 O 4g Vad O Edga bwe $' fmm to 1 !Doti. C f5 X16' Ved O Edgo below 1]5' fmm Np of looli�g C bel 1.7T Gone top 9of footing SVOpEO B' CMU SOLD GROUT SECTION A -A i rm= Isco ' F _ Now 5 O16 Vert 0 age f 4 O 24' Hoax A WALL A3 p B' CMU SOLD GROM MIN, m 14 0 M'O.C. __m= 1500 F w BE . I+.R/fb O fG WmM1 O ge O 24' H.Hx �•r3° CER. /4 0 24'0.0. (AS SHOWN) `f4 0 IS-= 7.5' MIN. Im - 14 0 24°0.C. (AS SHOWN) I�fS. GTE'. -DIST. CL -CL )'� CL -CL 6' jf'---4 1'm= 1500 6 F = 60 lai 2� 5A' •1 4 O 48 Ved O Edge rc� 4 0 24' H.H. - A WALL A4 i 14 0 16'O.C. Lr MIN.IrY cm. M4 0 24'O.C. (AS SHOWN) - 5' TO FACE OF SLOPE I 3 O 2 4 SGM- )' = Y M WAY WITH VEHICLE SURCHMGE 5`"P .A;\ ®5 O W' Ved O Edye hp. 1!i9 fmm W � f fea )'-3° / C f5 X16' Ved O Edgo below 1]5' fmm Np of looli�g TIER A B' CMU SOLD GROUT SECTION A -A i rm= Isco ' F _ Now 5 O16 Vert 0 age f 4 O 24' Hoax A WALL A3 p MIN, m 14 0 M'O.C. �•r3° CER. /4 0 24'0.0. (AS SHOWN) CL -CL 6' jf'---4 1'm= 1500 6 F = 60 lai 2� 5A' •1 4 O 48 Ved O Edge rc� 4 0 24' H.H. - A WALL A4 i 14 0 16'O.C. Lr MIN.IrY cm. M4 0 24'O.C. (AS SHOWN) - 5' TO FACE OF SLOPE I 3 O 2 4 SGM- )' = Y M WAY WITH VEHICLE SURCHMGE 5`"P .A;\ IV CAN SC fm= 1500.,it suoPE VpRIFS .I 7.5 MIN..I 1 - 5' TO FACE OF SLOPE -rl fine• WALL C EXPERIENCES LOADING FROM ADJACENT WALLS IN MULTIPLE INSTANCES. BECAUSE THE MAGNITUDE k DISTANCE VARIES FOR THESE COMMONS ME WORST GSE WAS CONSIDERED BEING WALL D AT THESE DIMENSIONS AND THE BEARING VALUES SHOWN IN THE WALL CALCULATIONS DIST. GL -CL I4 O 46• Ved O EdgeEd // O ,6' srI Do tl9f foo6ne / �l 20' O 1y6� Ved O Edge � 2.0' fmm lop of holing 8" CMU SOLD GROW fm= 150D F- W ki 5 O IES VeM1 O Edg< 4 O 24' Noriz WALL C O I6'D.C. .CES, j4 O 24'O.C. (PS SHOWN) e 8' CMU SOLID GPC V- 15W pJ. Fv= 60 SLOPE VARIES - 5' TO FACE OF SLOPE 3' E ti above LO' fmm Tap of fooling �V i4 O 16' Vert O Edge bow 1.0' Irom to of too0n 1d1�NCPkfT11N k5i ®® z$• H �,° Edge WALL 641 b Otop edO16'O.C. �§4 O 24'O(/5 SxO.tQ _� LOPE xD. suvb 0• CMU SOLID GROUT % � w f.0' fmm of Furling — 5'-6' _ Ym= I500 Fr- 60 Ld �ed m WALL 61 ,6 Edge a ° z4' xedz 1 _ /4 O 16b.C. J4 O 24-O.C. 6' MIN. 3° CLS. (AS SHOWN) � SOLD GNROW' � v . we o fine'I� W. DISE. CL -CL 4 5 O q6 VeM1 O Etlge 14 O 24' H,oriz / 5' / Hont M. 14 O 48' Vod 0 Ed,. 60ve 1.0' fmm l0 f foo0n C /4 O 16' Vetl O Etlg< NO SLOPE 8' CMU SDUO GROAT belo 1.0' from lop of IooiNg fm= 1500 8 Fy- 60 k' Sao ,6 Yed ° Edg< ' 4 O 24^ Hodz WALL B21 �i p) j-6• MIN'I�3' CtR: (AS •SHOWN] � ' � N CL -CL 6'-1' . / / TIER B SECTION B—B 1•� f4 O 40' Veit O Edge `a bow 1.0' from to, of (ooUn L, ' / /4 O 16Ved O Edge 1��(1/ B' CMU SOLD GROUT mR f f4 16 below 1.0 fmm top of fooling WALL B31 lY O VerIEO Filgef , ®24• HDHz �-6" MIN'Iry" cue. 6'a ®za'o.c 64 016'G.G. (As sxowN) � m CL -CL 6'-P� 5'-6 (4 O 24' WALL HDFFS: OCONTRACTOR i0 NRNISH AND INSFNL 4' SCHEDULE 40 P.Y.G. PERNRATED COLLECTOR PNE (OR PPPROVN EQUNAIFM). WALL DPNNAGE SYSTEM TD BE OUTLET AT A MAXIMUM SPACING of 100 FTEF, WiM A MINIMUM OF 1W0 OUTLETS PER WP11 SECTION. BOWPll GAS nu 10 CONSIST MOSRY OF N41NE FP3liH AND MUSE CONFORM To iNE PRDNSIDNS DUNNED IN THE SOI(5 REPORT AND ADDENDUM LEITER COMPACTOR IS TO INSTAL_ 3/4 -INCH TO i -INCH CLEAN CRUSHED ROCK (DR PPPRCVID EQUNNFO) FOR I FOOT IMMEDIATELY AOIACEM TO ME ROCK OF WNL TO A DEPTH OF 1 FOOT PBOJE ME FOORNC (1CF/FT). OC STF¢ REINFORCING 8UV5 ME PERMITTED TO BE 1ERMINAIN AT THE HBGHf PROVE FOOTING AND SPACING AS SHOWN ON WE PLANS. 1H5 GW RE PERFORMED BY f11HFR PVGNC PREFORMED REH411 ;F AN ALIERNARNC PATTERN PND SPECIFIED 1£NGM TO OMAN THE HEIGHT AND SPACING SHOWN ON WE AIMS OR FlEID WRING EVERY O1NEfl OR EVERT THIRD REIiAR (/S PPPLiCABI£) AT TI4E HEIGHT PROVE FOORNG SHOWN ON PIANS. IF TME CONIPACIOR PREFERS TO LAP RIE OARS. MINIMUM IPP SPDLE IFNCIXS OF 54 INCHES, 45 INCHES AND 36 INCHES PRE TO BE USED FOR /6, 15 AND 11 BAR LAPS flESPNIIVFLT. pO CONTRACTOR TO FURNISH AND INSTALL Pft¢ABRIGIED CEO-WMPOS(fE RACNORNN (MIWOPNN 6000 OR PPPROVN EpUNP1FJg1). THIS O¢,CE IS TO BE INSfN1ID PER INE MANUFACNRER'S RECOMMENDATIONS, SECURDY FASIElIED i0 TIE 84LK OF WNL AND FREE OF SEDIMENT (4 O IES' Vert O EHge 6" ti above LO' fmm Tap of fooling �V i4 O 16' Vert O Edge CMU SOppUryryD 4yyft0UT e1Dw LO' Irom tap of footing 1d1�NCPkfT11N k5i ®® z$• H �,° Edge WALL 641 �(ucssr� edO16'O.C. �§4 O 24'O(/5 SxO.tQ OIH, .G e � xD. suvb — 5'-6' ONCE R4CKFlLL IS COMPLETE 11 PIPE RNUNG PER AACXIIECYS PVNS fm= I6W F = DOW 4 O 4 O 96 aM1 O qe .N 24' Hoxz 1 WALL E EXPERIENCES LOADING MOM PAIACEM WALLS IN m &5.,0 46' VeH O Edge MULTIPLE INSTANCES. RECUSE THE MAGNITUDE & DISTANCE e 4.D' from k0 1 ta<pn VARIES EOR THESE CONDITIONS WE WORST C45E WAS /e O 16' Ved O Edge CONSIDERED BEING WALL At AT THESE DIMENSIONS PND THE below 4.0' fmm lop al foo0ng/ BEARING VALUES SHOWN IN THE WALL CN.CUGTI0N6 / 6' '2_CM�SOL�GROUT I✓J W 8 O tb Ved O Edge - 4 0 4- HOdz -3.00' / / wm umr O VERIFY WALL EI IS CONSISTAM WITH LANDSCAPE PUNS END DEVILS PRIOR TO 'i WALL E1 p #4 016•D.L. pa m za'o.c. (AS sxown) •II 1' MIN. -( I f-3' CtR. e a ��Jbbs l0' OA CONTRACTOR TO MRNISH AND INSTAL 4 SCHEOUIE 40 P.V.C. PERFORATED COLLECTOR PIPE (OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT). WALL BRAME SYSTEM M BE OUNkT AT A MUOMUM SPDfANG OF too FET. WRH A MINIMUM OF TWO OUTLETS PER WALL SECNON. OB WALL RACKRLL TO CONSIST MOMY OF NATNE FARM AND MUST CONFORM MINE PGONS'DNS OURINED W THE MUS REPORT AND ADDENDUM L£RER. CONTRACTOR IS TO INSTPll 3/4-INCH TO 1-INCH MEAN CRUSHED ROCK (OR APPROVED MUNAENT) FOR 1 FOOT IMMEOWEEY ADJACENT TO ME RACK OF WAIL TO A DEPTH OF 1 FOOT ABOVE ME MOUND (1CF/Fn. OC STEEL REINFORCING CRS ARE PMMMEO TO BE TERMINATED AT THE ROOM ARM FOOD "I AND SPACING AS SHO'M! ON THE PUNS. THIS CAR BE PERFORMED BY EMER PUCING PREFORMED REEM OF AN PLTEIiNARNG PATTERN AND SPECIFlED IENGRI TO OMAN ME HEIGHT AND SPACING SHOWN ON ME PIANS OR EMU, CURING EVERY OTHER OR E THIRD REBAR (AS APPMCABLE) AT ME Proof ABOVE FOORNG SHOWN ON PIANS. IF ME CONTRACTOR PREFERS TO IFP ME BARS, MINMUM IM SPLICE LENGTHS OF 54 INCHES, 45 INCHES AND 36 INCHES ARE TO RE USED FOR 16, /5 AND /4 BAR UPS RESPECIDAY. OCONMALTOR TO FURNISH AND INSTALL PREFABRICATED GED-COMPOSM MKORAIN (MIRADRFIN GOOD OR APPROVED EOUNALEN). THIS GRACE IS M BE INSTAUlD PER ME MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDARON% SECURELY FASTENED TO ME RACK OF WAIL AND FREE OF SEDGI M ONCE RACKFlLL IS COMPELTE EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. A SrNttdY GYW Foa WFMIIAY hWK BE AVAHAAX AT NL Vu VU ME P/AAr. SFA51M'. UE Y MNT.. W AVAMdffiE WI SIIF AW ST=PW AT WMA'rtAT LOGIM45 W MIMRAW FWB LtAYSW Aw A, ]WWWO' Af M m AMM .Ya' MukTD gVagV ONBPoIL YFA[UPES MHEN WNL 6WLtlNE]!/. 2 BEYi6.9L°IL AVT 9E YOIiD 0.4 Y0.'Ylm MMWr ME MP.PoYIL OF ME cm vovma¢ !. ALL %AIW/BLE PROLELTM 0.`NR3 SNOIfN SNVL BFW PIAS AT aC" mB OE wN FAom MY. MH,V FK ME -WY PAW R'MA4IBWTV mgP/5r fMSmS b RM:EA'r. f. AF LN! A FVMTPPY NL SLr NLD O!)R.SYIVL Bf BEYG4IB faOH "MV BFAVS NLJ B6F1/AV' e(LAS /M' 92Dm SIS£ FUPFA2 PFJImIFYI NFAS OSY°GEB OUroLD A RUNLLNIf lNVl N50 BE NY[CLIYLY F£P S f!LL aOP6 AT ME WACr PEPINEIIX YBiI DRAIN AWAY 1HE WpF M 90Pf AT WE CIYNLUSNY! LY GLYI MA4A'i!B My. 6. "w hT m ML AVT f ISNLD BDOAr NI NMRJYID EAVSION LYYNINL PUN. RNS.WI CO.YIRIX 5NN BE WNLL/£tFm WftINC ME Aw,, y (D:TL1@I! IRA. N9Y lIf ]. P".a IT N.Y-WCI SIgW Y2VNIGE SLB JVKS M. SLIXNTNI GllWiLNC Bf PMMWNO IMLs PFaECLKKI NW CD.ffi PYAMVS fl A= PANG —WLT IffAMW 9. ATGPF Y91FFI45 AWAY RW DFVN ANAW N PFEY£M SIOFH WN£F FNN-GW 10. NYMNN PANNB EWPNWI. PU.CF fA%P PAYS qp PBSM(6FM N11WVf.5 WICIX PAWK EPGPME1Lr INYIL AtlIW IbE lI. f1FNIW!%ILS MM /ffiORPFA'l WifRMSWBIfF BVN WRMC. 1z M nror Nlow SWO nam H YM OHN hflY ASPHLLI M 1YA4L IMB STCAN DRNLLs Br.MT➢YAL' n oLD a4lWT oust BE hL45fD q" flRCPLFLY. IXYLECT. aE MAU eaaxW Aswger Ras ME srE 11. KEEP Ifg2: s0E tlLAN AW D.bl`ALY. aL WD M A aNLLY FALfKKL IS P"EALY Sr AC PNMS AYO SDL4 16. PaHS AN � MYININITe'WWSFlQa B5PoS4 OF M39NdL A. AZT. WYIBY OLLAiIr/" STCPALE CAVY W DESKYNIE0 AF AY0 AT UE N AWLD 1R4LWAPF MV G V1 PARS M INIaT M Ifl HVW@' IM' ISE L1c NIZNWIS WR PY-m 19. [VNI IIP (EAYS AYD 4YI15 WNEMIRIY. 38 N4W flflll AIIO/PI ro USE RAR NANT WYPS M I.ALI AW GYAVSIFU491tll 1YblE 21. WLLECT 91E IF4LL mn fS^II yWa9M. AW AY0 MAYWNWagS j2 A%iVH£ m FmYYAY WASE LWLFCT fi N O]NT,.Q W . iJ. lM Nor AR.D BMSNES 0.P PAWI WKIANRS ]D BE pFAUR BVTW a2 S( W/IW L1P SLLWY PMN. 24. SHHE—ZREIWR9U5 FM1Wf IXVANKIE PULFLEM PYKR LV1R. AWAY LMW Da4NltE A.ffAT. X MY R:BUWWAWIX/r /RFA5 Ama BE mroAtORSIPRII PWAS OI}TI troWR '. QP SIRE[1S 44 )LLTAP4W WVAAY FKYNRS SIWL BE WMAMm N LKU MUMNG BA9EB B A IKWSm RIMLE 27. ME LOMTF SHAtt PrtASE NIC AW16 A lICYrS� wtr LW M6 PLW. 18 /p GSIM.WTMI AT LKIUFBVLIF Li mR.MY q't4NNl LWft56' PP FnSIWD SM1NN PMN WIEIS 9W14WF gl.4IW' INE IYA1W 1N PMGS rWT FA YASP'!, LMESS /MgYI£ RNNAYM/hRWYW( R w TR mw&U: APl'TTfB AYO P'SINLEo rocvWr SLWALE E NEARLSf PRICBGL SIREFF. 52WY NYNL P4 N1a/F4 WA1FF LONSE 29. IHE BflsO SNVL [MZV.1.I MS OFEIt41KKIS W E AYWNfR MR SIptY RUM1'r M4 BE pAYUdVm MaNW aK R'M.Rr M MIX WN MF SIPW CR4N SSYN XN/L'H SEF{6 INE MNKVF AAu saves aunaF NRW avE Aau swE Nor eE NEowm ro mRr ro ANDMR WrLArF AIu !o. rnxrrA¢uYxc xmI nM aWNaWW1s oT Ma nAN sou W nn WAY Po1EK B[tflGWLAiIAW N6 A'FBNA98R1/Im 10 NAS 9l£ AAD OPYLBHmMPRa6. frAIRX4P/FWP'KKI NNLMX 9l41 OM'95r p; M? N0I BE IMYR al. IXMSNLCfLM' SIH.N £NYNI6IAD T/AML $XX NFAW.&S AS AP£ KCE6W/ ]D P� NLFFOL AHO AaiE wABR HUD AM1V fBlSKW GWTE ro PuNLB FAME PALrtxrvas A aoixr a< ME camalLcnrx+ w nes PFwmr. JA CIFNBA@ ANO � m umn, IO AFFAS my m FECfd£ & mq. W4VN0. EBPAYL OWAAX urAALFR xuL BE amuxLo ro PAONCI Aegis xMW NaIE BEw cmaem Mo cau98m PAAM ro LF4A'NB oPRAMNL aM RMCII AK SV&£Cr 1U AunCY{' MMA4" nlE PWRMI LMYI Of iNF RYNY SFASllY 11BX YFISUF6 WY MLAUDE Bur sNNE NGr BE uAnFn m ovAm NroIIFS BBDSY BAaFrms AND s9T roto'. GAE swL BE EiRlsm ro PFLsmE VFLETAIAM' azravo mars a' cWrorc APPLICANT SANDEEP SHAH W97 ffi A WE FMASISIBE. G 92506 Ip: (909) 856-1592 ' CATCH BASIN TYP. N.T.S. EROSION CONTROL DETAILS PRECISE GRADING PLAN I TRACT 23¢83, LOT ¢3. qBN IF STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE N.T.S SILT FENCE DETAIL N.T.S. LEGEND: r� = GRAVELRAG BARRIER PER DETAIL HEREON = SILTFENCE FENCE s o = FIBER ROLL .yySFfSS/p!¢ . i 30 90 N0. SVBO SCALE Y = 30' eh?Gl\F�' PRECISE GRADING PLAN TRACT 23¢83, LOT ¢3 SIDE VIEW A -A N.T.S. REAR VIEW B -B N.T.S. ,m "THE COONTRY" mE(sountry fl\ A REV OW U Q I P . p AI•z WIFnwVr ZztiI�iUL�. I /X=N'GrzpyS.�'S iGTC011S - PROJECT NOTES - y ZONING \ �z�awlc�Q<wu�Rui�R4 ' 'LEGAL DESCRIPTION r \ \ _ . evgc Lor a of ]xXcr vlm ov+uPs RSwxo:9 .W BCOq ]90 PA4LS 5 nIflOWM/ 19 Or NMS. xEL. 5 :. V�ExwC6WMY.SU.RMpq OF IU$ .WLEiFS CgVA'IY. \ SITE ANALYSIS Lm Axu Iz]gna Pr/sE LV'tlfrA9N rm ROOM : svgn/xi MIOFlCOR 3gggRlSp G�FnV00. 391Efi/fLL rmulmxEa mnPr/w - 1mE6fMFe ! fAGG6 ' : IDAft/f4 ' . . RLNfPoPfH: 'W RI50. ' PgnoroP eoP rr/fn '. .PAIp POJL LW R)SR '' rOfNPAIp: ]LfnlW nRAtfGVFRED/.PF:1 Ili6fi%SR .. mrulmwvm]+i zaE = LOT INFORMATION . attSPVf1YPUMPNNE . pAMOXOGP.G9l]55 . . mm .Ro .rumz5ero ]OIOCellromuEuildingLMS bTYU ' ]OjOCalirwNe Ruidm:W CMq - ' xwouur mi. v."wwceda - '" - • ' loiowlromi. manNwlc<d� • ]OIOCdIEomis PlumMog CMt - ]mocmitomi. �gyad.. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER xolXarmml.Pim cock mn-Ru-9v . . • ]OIOGIikmiaGvn CM4 _ OWNERS INFORMATION cauetTTI' V. D. all. 61 r x(•.3/11.1 SWR@6NIIV HWI NVI06 3ih 51'LIJW.8K 6j5fF Yl. IPKl lI'I T• . PoIOT.H 634]RXOV6IAXE :lrr7 7 '�I'. onc. IwGslu, uluoP f.�:lt VAT>IF� Lj$ I7.. } (gyp"y/py`j tV'('- h91tG AIZI 10 91l S pqj g glygl LL•hr 4 �N 'F"x'' F S unY�p—m.pip'•.TN �. YJ¢I UVV E@TM 00.OM rr�ll REV OW U Q I P 1 ` oiemo„n aa. "THE COUNTRY" �; ' FIIc�ORBiCIJ o:n e.:oa. , . a' Il g Ie ji { t u dwV l eO i I 5 X30: � PR w.- • .�l•.%yia�y0 B x F 0 b_t/ g, 4 Eu I Pef PROJECT NOTES .-. mugxa�sJ/MasD - ....NIIL LYSMPJI /YL< 61 M . ZONING (R� '. �. ZWLICRF a (4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION � - 6ONC LM OF iR1Ci 1J1&i OF NppS RENRpE•) -W BWl( )9q pgD6 b 1HM1WICN 19 OF NA3• AFW.GaS � 'OF ME cUVMY SURVEYOR OF (OS /Jf6Lt6 COUHn ' P v�ojc KauvFm .a+�T vwne cCFHulca eYDAzey. __ Pf•PAvfF $Y JGn/6Y`W'hjEncnG 14sTs-urpv C�'A Yr.T�o us W . 90d.p.l .j1 9Ll. de(,a .n0. 9c43.k 3- Z W U SITE ANALYSIS- - W U)TAPftI : 151RIaFI/14 _ '� TOP{IaOR : 3L93 ETAC - 4I MIDiIaDA 3ii9f(/SD B0. fI40R ]SlSii/?D lOtY 11VMG: WAR/SR -. {!t . :ISLE 'ARF7 i WM4E5 - 1D]YfT/W ' WOXf PoRW: 350 R/.p{ I ' PAlroloP IDf R(SLL PAnOMN t 361 FFIM ' PAIIDDI3E : 81l R/W - vanowol- ,. lOMPAno: uevipw mru mvmmAUA 4Mffjm ' MALLO1NVEiRGE 26% � - u LOT INFORMATION A 1SOSRUSlYP11MP 4NE W r - auMDxDRRR,u9lrbs 'S't mAaR3Mp F . IO1R63 i I: . ASSESSOR' SPARCEL NUMBER; OWNERS INFORMATION smo®RAiaD slur 6391RNDakT WiE - Rn+Race.u9lsoc P.u'ei PN) 9A6tL-3933 _ : ExwO awuzm®xANOp.Pw.l ' .we 6LLI.{1 eMa W �' XEVISIBNS BY I i —Wim Cr_AU vo a 1.Y CAS 1 i F h ' W O 5 r r_II V _ � // _ it"m i r� u t�ni .u�igloa_ I .i `� Q YN fIN � i NT;/ 3 •� Bo s IA]]ry i( Nan -R-rRorvl.. R.nny eea9µc Fewc:. ncrrs r . mum :I{ Il?�F_.31:,4. O('.'NIL6 LIW. H,r.fi I.ILFY hIIL/^ R4RFS$...(: rr.ryA4•K5 � F+1Sd __ .xi.. Tfl's' .: Yi%54 .YSPE . YTPC Vc1I7 VEv.�.` N/ Y/fl fFe`i. b 4 %Z z U1�'iI N L 14%IS vrJr ti L.%J-¢ I',.}�,/'/U MASK; e Can -1 Pt -r=+ -S c IN. s � oYo I FpJrNy 4yI5L FixEv h r D'61 p rr.5 G lot' 2 D'vK `Il°x 1564vrIrJ4 /r li. 7r9 20/zo Y :F vri�. �3 c -r Ls 1'P rjA.-L 16'u 15R F'veJ 19.fi %.% G$f hl uPf c' ! Px NS rvl f n ✓ � ZXIZ 2 ENrrcT 14"X 160 Fu'foTEnYcg IJ q � p J sr FLICIiTS FoR � 6°X 3` I EJr¢r 14x Is° (Ixfp TMI :<' {I � j¢/u IJ neFv.4N 'K 3°k}' 2 STnrFy2 'N/A Su ocF I.oJ-r .i/: 2¢JII N ' 3`x3 I PcwoER IJx Sr osc n; T[n;-o-r'9.F/'S •)/2 rJ rCn�. _cv r L`Xi� 2 KIiCH[nl I$%aJL' iFrtT LaW-E 41/A 1"+/1= X S8"X 4' I IicNEJ IY.xLa xpx [nrcG ILA -Al Nis nPeeen lee I, Vr¢o H%dam FPrr. h. Tile' i6o Lovf-ESe°./'1. Ip¢/O IJ C,.lit � E.f Deo: S ucs. 3"x 5° 2 °ca#1 IS'%l; 4`6ctti Lo.J-r: IL.)/y,.d �u/sb Y c.>FNre nacrldc Id 4zs" z eece 16xls° >m Lo.�.c Is.�/aq +UJ %o Y tn��aGr. l-'cs-wa ¢2`x 3e a+axsf IJ/A us-rr re �:v- I.1%1 1,/A IJ ' iEnPce -4`xkf LauKvF1 5L Is ,E+rce .;/+.z �?Jrz y ir_r,Pce V;, 's` 1iEnrLE's°xR"ducce Lo✓ -G N/a 5x4' I �1 r2v'a�a z�.: ._ cv-G JAp la/I� tit �.r�.F r.�/a 2�I� - N iV srs[ 9 Y.14' USC �. fLrfC4 IY'S I 6F��G 5/? til TEnP�2 `/ Ox5' I MN 11z /6'X22 XOX Lo --'-c 29.' _ri4.l bo 2T Y vWss eyp=ua g6�Fon 2�IS klvRp loL/-c 33.11&61n RJo IJ' f¢rJ'rio e`l ��r N2 ¢N ISyl3 Low-416.�s4 y[NTEU Cf mo(a Y 3X5' I bLUrO IS`xl3(.asc hLA-E tt.%.¢15/15 Y Yc-licn vY nveP Z SIX' pvofL- anuE-r FK*ne 'Tx"IC' nF(erw LIiN„ ' I"LLF �'m>.- eL*r€ro Y/IJ . p�MrEKe bj Ok 9° I f'IVoT GE455 UAK YE$ IJp YCS v4FwNvENKvKe •®I Ir=1 3�X yr 2 .iVHly voL� pAK nO YES Y45 {I6 µT.'c`rT �c c� ❑b 3°x S' S yING vJpU nAK 110 YES Y25 �3%� 6 SIJIJI PANEL L'A I.' LIQ-. NO P. L.�`Cloc'cn/LxGrNr n+eYI tri n'J Lace�ecn/v.' sv..lb P :• L on'� I.'o _-.e�. cr- . _- %❑2'XE� Z P-^- F✓ IJ h-0 6O L.^[c iATF Ruar(5 IJ GXS � Val (Ln. LA Y1 LIJ `(v5 LJ 6'x3 sl n (" - o .. s rEs M10 W. crsr�r ar.•. amu® ;�I Lll II'Y[ 81-0 Y'> .0 6 Xu' 3 AI(G hJC AK IJO FL FIJ 6°X u 1 SLIDEG 14: 3`x5 I C}frcE 15X1vP 11pc¢ ..-[ I&4 Le ' J+.3 6D� 5 y tt✓ LILNrv6r_L YCT I©IL'X9 1 d°x 5` 2 �a +'x�z Y Fo °uS S lrO�c 3�,pS li sl}'chsE3T'c•/-61L't 3.?>p/ia Y cTE:�i LI ✓INpuV e V STON GY ti1PnA ALS pvofL- anuE-r FK*ne 'Tx"IC' nF(erw LIiN„ ' I"LLF �'m>.- eL*r€ro Y/IJ . p�MrEKe bj Ok 9° I f'IVoT GE455 UAK YE$ IJp YCS v4FwNvENKvKe •®I Ir=1 3�X yr 2 .iVHly voL� pAK nO YES Y45 {I6 µT.'c`rT �c c� ❑b 3°x S' S yING vJpU nAK 110 YES Y25 �3%� 6 SIJIJI PANEL L'A I.' LIQ-. NO P. L.�`Cloc'cn/LxGrNr n+eYI tri n'J Lace�ecn/v.' sv..lb P :• L on'� I.'o _-.e�. cr- . _- %❑2'XE� Z P-^- F✓ IJ h-0 6O L.^[c iATF Ruar(5 IJ GXS � Val (Ln. LA Y1 LIJ `(v5 LJ 6'x3 sl n (" - o .. s rEs M10 W. crsr�r ar.•. amu® ;�I Lll II'Y[ 81-0 Y'> .0 6 Xu' 3 AI(G hJC AK IJO FL FIJ 6°X u 1 SLIDEG 14: 3`x5 I �� T aP iP �j',pp y¢s Fo YCT I©IL'X9 1 61-f^LD VooD '.K .�a do Fo STON GY ti1PnA ALS IJ.I less, CYMd,t- a N REVISIONS BY _ N �tl - "5 �I I �3 M _ Y a' W �l a Ni m I-F}-.~-u- -. - IIIiI 1- -. ..-.. --- -.l�"iI'-Rg--�Oo:o�-'� g.II�lI m1IiiI ..�. 3e-z0rIia�-.z�riJ r-II _I.0.-III—`FG:-JI6_z9NII.'IIa�'�o33a_ '�� IIIi 3.II�II'. .0-_.' .-lIIIi ._—iIIiL:. Y�4+cs—'n-,LG••_r• .L—I. �s..Ny- �TL :. .7tAPFZo�--1�FT8.'1o,_,1�7o0v1'.'. -T refiLLrI_ory__l)___:;"_L_uLn__e_'-_—C.--e_1—_-6i`€'____6I- j _,R• I-__>`—_i_._ao_�- II ---1_5,�J9,IIIII�I . .. ' - `o .cl -- All— I'll W�= A5Ar `�SHA4 ... Ko 1 SN ; Y�mN �i d w I v 'o M N 0 m m `n J N -o N =s `o 1 1 1 L -t I I I r . f I I I I -a LA: 1 I=ra_uotA 1 I I 1_1 FP,tl9.92 r' I I I I 1 I - " I ( I I I I I I jQ12'.. 16 3 �-I'/i 13=9 2 a': . 13'0 Z'o 13.9• 1� i z I6-3� Z.i �e G�9� �. e� - Z3' 0 13= 9° lil p h'' 9 23.0 �. 3'• - - 1510115 BY i I ( I mrron 1 � 1 _ Ljj � r oe_ s I 1 1 I 1 EAErvop I I I -i t IYt 5 el TYrlc..-4 rf-1 roF .tn-tw ce �ooF i ---------------------- M-1 I I e 4p I s U i I � � m ' m fl�1N —J 3�5 y Izoo� PL/, -O �m SHAH r: Ma _ �-� : ��_I � I ■�� IIS ---maz wTL�VfTfoN .. 5Lh C Q4"=1 v” uMa TtL�e Dior � si: Iz plfL� 5I. LY(. 60 nt.z\ ). f3�+Gis- zflL 'xr4czt-=ice 3ryoco tav� �jrit i.il� c�N'T• ,, MATERIALS LIST Qm�.,nx�w om,w ,uomw,x uy„uuroan:,n (� wPonx�-u,u cu: oxuxlm �„x„,.nw,o„aw:.m,.0„umw.wn � (� wxowxsznnw.ene a.ow,�ol.,xuowow„mn:w.+.l moMOoow wxx,x,:.xur ,vaoou,x,w..w.mn�•o*�Owo'm.,, , '�J zuw,.ws mu,ux[,x,um .xzusi zaxznnE,i x,.muru,lnua nVen'1 0 .N�xx ,r.mr..w«v.00xws ...M„nnMwx.xw,m=nasap+*, �”) u,nroauO,mna w,.,.omw,w, oo..au<.,ao�regoxaxW:x,w.=o, 0. gEV1510115 I— oa,o I O, ma. PEYISIOHS BY i b • - MATERIALIST '. M.Ix uu�,u.luxdN;Nsm - .Q rnrniti�-aMm.• u000vmPwHe tvp+pflxiw� .Q roaaxp-rcp¢- x•wuvrto-mxcnlalwxpw¢iwamvumrzwxm,Y ' ' 'Qa. vnxoowa•vra nencM pmw000v¢pueapvmxxwl w+wmo�ma ' O mP4T OpOP'NpgNp9flµ1¢y. \}yb' oNAlFlu>.pa41PIVOfNpe)NpWXflN 'O pNN4EpWx5-MAftIXp00RS WMohYOIENP.41AL 16VAti¢wl)NOWNiIx ' O04YMNS •awRpXFPp¢AB• PP[VSi n1NME13'M.nIffIH (SNtlnpy@P O. wNlc•R¢RY Mp1. PPppl%IS• GBI[PMISttrtAf leYiW141mjIH119l. Wsla ' O PtwioNBCNnxc-wirnPwmM• OPaM¢Wap\RPIXp[NMkIxG)ab�q ' _ _ K20. FL iFi pMMY _ _ fi LE.en PL. Ihf f 1 I W 5- v✓.. ❑ w o Q P I j cn LLS}_ qn h LLt. j ' __FF IIll.3o I I U V O;ill "'91S E13 ma. f+oYen � 6(UaX PEWGIGN9 BY MATERIALS LIS WUX'FMWTAAO3MODUcl5- WAWESNUEMq.'+EHd Mgi —2wr iaa FL UT 122n e fDb rmr kw lr\ E15 C) u U) uj 0� R 0 N mrgP _I%y�Gj01-!y' I.11e 4-rf- is 9 PENSIONS 9Y � ' PEVISIONS BV • sf of RoeF Iz25.0 W U 1JI _STC EV }RT� i>zo,e W v O 1 �kllj C ng4 1118 ei w o f I 1 jl le Fe"'LT z+lo 5TJrfi '✓ :I :I' __--- KF lvw.m IL "oho �l8 PY✓ 1 3 I' l9Pj.1£_ FGnn 6HLe T-SrOFV-GE I ria r ------------ rFW'' • � - yI-9 _ 4b to H�a�i_zr3 ��.-�j'+Lm�f• _� �� -T - 1� rix - . . � -. � _ �1 0 I d � L_ KF IIL•.m tJJ =1sb3 ,e e�� T� p EVI510N5 W ' U z W '� O sl � zj Q qi = I U1 Lighting Legend Construction Notes Svm/fib MFnuf. Model ptv D d t( NLFFlxsiSLlµp68WFl AbflW sUprceOTlWxYbom CP4F¢YEmNEL L4 E�➢G��Ew`PPoMAIVILLIDN [q'6PAE{FObYeGMpf PPDpDEe'i10 ENx4GflirEOALL xEM`ED nu+mau�EAsaro ImreP exmgeuws ya FXLurtimakeLR-50 'y 12a FaFatle Wuz'h ^LL Exrs DFHmxscwfrzEussxax6EIXSPEnEo.xD a. auuwiuDmnnwosciPEDs"'EESIDD,v�Evnvu°iuou Rsr Cappzr spear Mount WNatl 1-9 Flhv.MeRt�K �liil nN6s rDeESIxMDDN bFEIXYFlMSNSVupsE 1Pb30.¢ tamp e IxEL swl',mPu°FPvmDE Ebw%ED�YS LEWRIFALLsgw�u�m Y ,, E YXFnRPFPPE6Ex,A,pf yr sllX4gO5pFPE SIMHyFSRWIppDDP/+Nspi l%NUISEIWE s PExtsptsunFasE;rd)FgDmulu > \A FX Lwdne6ott-3565 26 10 12VTn,at), 4t Wilh Ib.NwRExu�igDaRDPxNSVminxlleNDFM.axnPAenOYNOauwsys>Bc axoctmvemTwDEx)uxss6wupsxPpr,iRw Fdw Copptt Gk�e 5NxN 83Swlaap� Pwg'OLxprllpyAyLFIRNreOECXeuE xOnsCD Speoi Abunl 0 i%IxminaYaCq-261BR 1Ej 0 12vpa1hEshlw � RmvCcppar Lamp Spwrllwntant..iB' �E EAVPrOdL�MVsiOEtxµs�PoqrEDmFLEEµgApPggFgWIpHiEPEyOSxE ��� - R!c) F%LVminaueFG30.RG-RB 6 6 12v AGnIAVeXLyxt FlmM1 Call fo— M... . Q FXt—batoRP-35R"-a.f 12v WeHtbt Mzh Uel13— A1wnl. b paW10, 35Watl Lem, Lighting Notes 1. u sNuteElragEarawwcpmE. YxftlFnprpwxwuuors•fiE�o.) � eMLEHwcpeLEFDgxp;W VNEIFIcftNEY1. 2..W.CgV11ECTGv510gE WnE1MMFnuMy flMVSEONIrts. PNdL LOeDqut ` 2. 1XN OPxIXLMA1KK1151µENgONwiENiDSNOIrt00EF�Flo vMInEO eY T¢ WmEPSG)MOgIZF➢pEygESFMFrryE 4. 6BEML ELYWtIXAn XO �9ryiENtO�OE VNVnE00YOVNEft �xSMtt{IED 5. L 114 to phc L'0 oldop lw eeVaNfvq Fltlmae,VM LEO Wins. A z HeR=O� t Y W ' M Construction Notes L-2 t MV)RAOiDflbIWIVERIA'µLeISIFAYpNb CONgnLYISPPNq(i0il¢ µMLNOPM1YXE VNNEyb L-3 NLFFlxsiSLlµp68WFl AbflW sUprceOTlWxYbom CP4F¢YEmNEL L4 E�➢G��Ew`PPoMAIVILLIDN [q'6PAE{FObYeGMpf PPDpDEe'i10 ENx4GflirEOALL xEM`ED nu+mau�EAsaro ImreP exmgeuws LS ' �����x�nrelxscwpwxwutaEEwm xusflvmxrNeFPPaoPgwrE L6 ^LL Exrs DFHmxscwfrzEussxax6EIXSPEnEo.xD a. auuwiuDmnnwosciPEDs"'EESIDD,v�Evnvu°iuou W �pxrwxl. oieiwR`"igsvftwniD"rx°e 1-9 Flhv.MeRt�K �liil nN6s rDeESIxMDDN bFEIXYFlMSNSVupsE 1Pb30.¢ Note: L-9 e IxEL swl',mPu°FPvmDE Ebw%ED�YS LEWRIFALLsgw�u�m Y ,, E YXFnRPFPPE6Ex,A,pf yr sllX4gO5pFPE SIMHyFSRWIppDDP/+Nspi l%NUISEIWE s PExtsptsunFasE;rd)FgDmulu > \A Arxv AnxsIDPE �ilwux uxEssxutxA•re luwxruL rawghamFEroa paxroF G 3 Ib.NwRExu�igDaRDPxNSVminxlleNDFM.axnPAenOYNOauwsys>Bc axoctmvemTwDEx)uxss6wupsxPpr,iRw >� PE gm6Y D�TqEUss%oMxsµxsNlFxaiµmmvOuNFmsLiPO�XMloODp°VPm6ioEpmMgnt)ugmrl4gUPolYDs nmPgmEcORasCvFmru Pwg'OLxprllpyAyLFIRNreOECXeuE xOnsCD a"ElnS- grxoi q IWgKIxcgVNECipx Wuun.,� �uxDFxamoa DEwsnroxsoFDEeusuwlrlxDFgo u.mcwgnADiogls PEsvoxaalrtExEaNsYprxgEpPERRoTrz1EEEmPPVny s._.. µP MErePs Em +wXrx rxE uxE � qqEVXVEs, wTs m eapltvvmo)EumEFPmin1mroY �E EAVPrOdL�MVsiOEtxµs�PoqrEDmFLEEµgApPggFgWIpHiEPEyOSxE ��� - e) �2F0LbErlYOXNE1LLI WPoEE�Fp 1).[EpDXRipqµ{LiIpOnRraOE6�ltPsDxVgA�EetIFEVEVxryD�gpgsOµgRlnp .AsFWMNIR. Sheet Index L -t . Spm Elevntions & Lighting plan L-2 Had -.pe Layout Plan L-3 Hardscape Details L4 Landscape lLFlgatinn Pian LS IMgnfion Details L6 Irrigation 4minmon, W trzigation SpecifLwions 1-9 PI:Lnfing Plan Note: L-9 Plnnting Details nlewlanxuaa Plain sneoc Newalu Cwservalien(antlxepo - Feywement pe)ONNa�rce No. W(2M) �¢SW OZW U `NO LLI 0 o M2 QR to o Lu w � o' J op ELEVATIONS S LIGNTING PLAN LSHEETNO. 2i1gPIp2lUAi 1 1". �I(ir.C'T' STONE Wa0 caµ/stalrrraaa WO -102 wsaw. so" Lvwozll wolJz.la sfeeNew VIU1DTt0 %dowq _ t'NI E WA%ENPMAVFNVESAMA ANCA B2iDS9�1 i1463Sa Si afbBBSIGNE FAX]tId]54493 Wl'M'.PACIFICS]ONENEL Construction Legend FirsOy P�owMOy FenSMpm AenaN. OSeeE waw Pawls, Hebniy Wap Copawawm OPbsles pllam gw. Alaltll House Plao... WM.Aavea m w PWIttCap. ORebin'ug Waplolblre Plwsl ConuCb CapoM PldsW Fa¢. Pbslel to Malsll Hwsa Pbsla. Preaazl Cop to Ee Pa¢ Vw slme Prens1AW¢IpWC102 Wala Rave plwsl ConuNe CapaM Sldre 4en¢vN Fayw.. Slorc VenMlo MaW Mwse.Plwsl Cdplote Par6t$Idg PregsIMWeIW1VLt02 V HI Wroght Isco law, See Geapn CeWO Sloul W. O24'ary bbne V—po, iaSly wfRwtl Cmuele Cap. See plan for Map HeIOAY. Pwad Cap l0 w Ndfi, Slow Preysi Malel NJC 1025ee MW .4w, W_ O.ro iigmenitawpao. O:,=, muds Pml Cop4q. C.cPGglobe'pMMW 51M0'AtWed' t0 Csawa KypatllMwl..l.sos.Wu,a.Paol Coops.o CMsso. oft HouseGenet' Cw slorfas Cow, Pwaoso, 1t YPnN Urva Eswpol^ Cm..a, to Coolo ws, lnSUllallon t2 spa Aws. Cwerlo Ee'Cava1 Pwp5-ANyaw Csww(Cova la, S(w; pa.1' Pn Awswf urers para—l-wa—Co. bM sUMmtl..0 15 Pml AuimmeOC Cwerlofie'CovelFwS.InowPelManutatl— Reymnmaalbnz.Ctldlobp SlaMmtl eloxn. 19 PMTJetl Vansryllg FdOe, CaMtaSW Ia aDOW fa T& .paa PoW WaW tlwm to Basin as xetl ss FwnlaN 0almv. 15 3-tY VMe bpYAnyS to FaunbN Row.dw, 10 Faso ... salpo.¢aas.MPls.. b... t] Moos."''lo e ThMCmude SVi51eC(W Tokl N gw osP. Slow CoMbbe'-os-wo ry'Fla051me. Ava W. al Cougm slope. ]19-B93i350. 18 Wall. Preual0""'s p.,tol-TwlilSSMre'MWeI(NC t@. Fauo151,bebe Tleaala.`sl'Th P,wwa._p,, 10 12' Wqe Cwiuele BaM.Cobl to Makh Pre+asl CawHe. 20 3I'aq,Pmpasl CoPd SM1eV.5ae R2'daBe%an(w Flnlsh FavMnnx Sea pealal)0 SM1eH LJ 2t <'—s, gl6m Gem.sea0eta SAeet W. Qu rmRxcolamtl coaramslab x+Tyles tleNla wa sard Aaeay Fm¢h CaW W Marh Preyst Comeb. 23 Ga'Dny—pkR ooaceoaspswtW. 2< Bualai pasdaEva Pdlarv.CmbeCblo Insure lligaW08 RreNage Cats tbmix Loyt'mu onvele pour.sea PUM'rg PNn1u Po15pesihaluNsso. aMPosla.l'vps. C36'XI.WougMlron Natll9.lmn to MAl FnsEylmn Hanervlzon Hoaa¢. SIC Nr W 1. Vtfl, S (NAeOpAM1. O]'Deep CmNal Glevel SUJw wiled Folo—TlealelW. EsCbg. Gavel b W LH- C,Vl GaW by HPC Aon AVaeable d if4Bi2-1625. 22 Pavvg M�aaal FmMEnlrySee Enlaryemenl5M1oo1LS. ze fo"T MN I ,RelabLlIbopR .(a Spee R0 Cwpop ily SWMaM IaC-}Aai Feae, Fent' Loolbnlo Malts myNs IAanrct�Mu FMy Lw4on so az b CarvretlNa OPltau CnmeePxr�nbLe WlyeJS- C AMd CaWle'. mblw h Abnl¢pv 9MFcm Nhi 180m1f V IuM.v applimonnud smwwx3e-Isaatvimrm, IartJl�Abaarwaaa RrvxxrcNavonv 31, iP^.ue+feFm^Ra iBRivl'6]5C£L4FPKq'N£H'C-3 Note: 1. Ail Ple�eal CowMam W pamFio $lane Ava115 Nee1]1463Dd)8i, ereQual. Colorb AtaleM1 Xouee Pn¢aeLTaMColorMBantl Finlary. o� Z $�u Q 2 3b� (J) atmU' ¢ Ou W Me Dim Q �olTT'a J opU CONSTRUCTION FLAN SHEETNO. L-2 OF 9 PaL w� �� TIS fapt, teN46E,.M ice" p4�Iw(vmw,ceP n i I , d�L I I ' GOND J n Ilii i��I� I I�. I 'Yiytpr talv+C.n�_ IrP X11 11 a G+Pi+EpT ' f°'EP'T' Pool Rear Elevation W=1W . dqD : GVE To e9 9EG.�ClKUG �4r+flkTr-U1M' Wrouaht Iron Fence %'=1'-0' IL REGq. 5• � GE(e1L ei ment Precast Concrete Pilaster =1'-0` J�. 7E�9TDW'NDAK ! #(a2. G.p. R UEw _ — SreNE: VrJ y ,•rv� bu wGiKE t1iM' j-1queE-e 'T'�N. VWO CKE of q' 5rA6v>Em ORa�i3o�uY.. Front Steps Elevation h •a•_g• (MMDFI flfEia ^Y,- — Tar 'N EE GELeaso eq cDDUFt � �V4 GN6F 610.LCUi'�e54AAprE. w/ bwlr rN4nGat5 euIGT�1{-�UV11N Wq� "{etiP'A�p1G. fgiD� uL^ YF b2• �3°T{1iGK1A�¢. of L° 8°MD1U56Va.K wvca. exk �Geuc. BA51N u✓IUMcsGPuIoF ME4.EwW J(�'{1Ep. Basketball He 3/8'=1'-0• IaA-r 51M P w -rep F 0J a - Q ' w W p� ZJO O $u EL LL,00 U6 W go s�€ p0 DESIGN DETAILS aue��id�vlz dS J {Fy L-3 g., IRRIGATION PIPE & VALVE LEGEND - �lnL1eMIM1'C I51e NaWn n - OavJ15 (m z'<vp Wy.e:rck'md t>tiek1vM'CRpe lntxml lias.ioh lug& (azs. Srs Nw-d E,FAY4sbniv<mvrtT.s�,. atwwlKlM,l¢ �5spv-Y)'M'C nn11x W[bmnllvtVue. ` -" "-' NvnvmpvndkmA.Y(Lvl vel,u baAal Jnb6�m,n fNdcfenurlrv_Wllbnsmu�a*vim nuU.ifevmwlwlY IRRIGATION NOTES: rvelrt vhim��mptt y �wMa,bunn d ee u IYW' MW. oL.uvnlevtrvR vw5 rm`.w..n m,w: au ww mmx« .doun ra 1 usom�mnmWblua�vnvlU'^P.+r Ivv�IgvSm aY+mn v.hmmahn Xk • nhwe,6v Wmvm Nc.M'vu�µ � S:rtunrva b,uv F.m #vww6[nq�ILAea�Eml. 'w�aPwva�a xN1F 'rtkt. ab ,. wy,Imwm..aNma ,am wmrv+z vlmx.ils'rv•^.-�ttnm IRRIGATION LEGEND ww1rs. un[v elm Q- Imtw PnoR mA ___ 0.1n15r1flpaCll3_PoNY) LSdIr1,UN Ilk W1DR M Y,a'W Pve c roxn vnwx'-noLlns}rxx xumle. ini°ryv[mITA I•Ueln Y.rw w uw W w� N- NAv Nr Iw.wmml<.ilwisPaER) (,xauw La. roXG CRSIenttSiiUZ-19E4YP% [YttN5AlI1LLNA1 oli � wvn�w ➢wc' YAl 'I cn.UbvaN. Q _.__ B�Ni'e 1.InF19W -a O- 1Muf o� r. u.r¢savK.Iss.a.rRx 1rr<oRnm oRANEs W Au a.Is Lm -e roxo P s 0, I0.n ttt oRAnrx 1�w 1 ,1: (1 IUXU PF14T3]aL VS}PX% YUT:.[ISNP ` •. Y1 AVIh, fif I.N �A- R, A.>mATo as 51-m 1.1s !r toxo r.s Pz]w-Iles}rneRCAll i"JSYfm-IdSflXv ! iUPU ,'S�RnKJ!hSIJK%I, ARC My fvilrc PR• (Uyi,X aiP\n f lith 13U pIv�IWUr�eX=(aID19y1 ilal 1DYA IYrdW.IL'.54PPY Ntn NI 1.19 IAC ARCM LIA _ .. nis.TP5rN.1A51. 615 q -a AR, RPU o- 5 1.14 ARC PPn Y C A. 11 IRCCp¢y p t[ 1 Tfi U3m),IJhV-wx 1U h 1 . r.TSNEJNy-pp%11 ARC0.T,N T10.0 nixJ43TO.I3h0.PAT 1ffi' ryYrN W OJJ [ 1.1U Y 1M15 .. }Ypx -P ARC11 4 IIV \Cl !atRC 0.TbppnOL1 PUpe,% _W A0.L' , a9 .1 -�' 1 PT�vJW.n9L1!e--sLppX ]W A. C. b pq5 Y 1.1U p NAO nT.IUNµN/..I)P.gYRx IARC UL1P. W 0.n Iv LI, If ,o1J1 nt.1Up5A(A+yS}P11% W'ARC RI. W P, Itt 11 roRU nr lvlslw�l)PF14P% Cffi MC n11m w nM 1V I. V• rUPO PT,., A,IID4...R% ISP MC RL'V5. ID n31 Ip 1J4 M0.0 (I.TIRL M1nK-1!vF4vNY .IT axf. PUA, w USP 1A ITtl (..� NXO PTarvrp.nUz-IIp51AxX zV ARC -Cw n19 ,A 1.1U 11MU Pl,:hvry51UL 1)f5}YPF IM'ARC .1. W IN V, IJU y' mxo nNl.mnuuzeaaRx to ARC A. w AS m 1p j? NPU wvxµrtpz,nsliAx w A. RIAC 11 .1 1z IIX c� NRO PFILT-nw.11.uYR% IW'Ap1. tllNttN 3v UA9 1. Iltl V Toxo o-r-fru-nve,)Ps}YxX IPP AaA - UXOR'n W nn rz uX P 'mxC Pi -I n]ILLSmz I_RSIJRX XW,nN b 0.E3 1_ IlU /�: N' NIIO 4'RIr.1GSMLi!IEfI'AX 3W MC ryppµH IU I.IS IT 1.)P IDAO P1.1�3rp5)A/..ItN4vX% JM ARC RPCRN b 1/5 IY I.IO C NPn oT,z<A-smL1.P.rI.YX% PP APA Xa« m nW 1x I� (� NRO Prla +y.-[IYAC W.Ut!' CUIX w WE 1s I.m yNN nTILr W3.I3Py P w� w A.) I, n "VA, n(.IYIf651w.133}P IW APC RIAtx 11 rt96 IS ,]A NPA a,.T.IM1II KIPYn.el\ ISP ARC MR- W 1AA IS .l NPV PrAS3ILL•3UZ.IYS.IPx ]IW ARE R1A1X W 1_tl 1a' 1..Y iUPI PT.ISN-SFZ-I+S�EIJz\ 1W API BLSIX b ,.M IS I.V T.IV U..""A SOZ.IlPA1JxC JM ANC XIAIX w >1 IS' I,A p[rrLVh.)5 gPUUPan <P ]5 1A Uy Ilwln IGLIi.0.-\'.I JI py.lelwu N IA IV U6i IRRIGATION LEGEND a, en ioAunlaw A nx`+witv`�}u.rAxl�rw:e,ai�:u,Rm. �j O Az, � vida�d U awo$ W X600 C470�� J Sp >_ scnva MRTGAT1IJ.\' SHEET NO. L-4 ww1rs. un[v elm Q- Imtw PnoR mA ma,e,abw.w IT.Mf:C.N) wef N�euiAnana'",-vtimmeM.ho-samly `jm.Yk CPVMFmvlvvmRF. rA(�_ I•Ueln Y.rw 8- Cw w� N- NAv Nr Iw.wmml<.ilwisPaER) (,xauw rens l.. rLwl.fw..l.mk x.w.. (Wm1 vJw3few Nnml � wvn�w ➢wc' YAl 'I cn.UbvaN. Q _.__ B�Ni'e 1.InF19W f A4vfmvw\Aw O- 1Muf J.� i[k+:4TFm+fW N:UwI'gvPFwrmPa,AJ RilI� -,tm�n. wrvfR yxuRspm.�..l�ejw Qo - rn 1�w .w..1a.I.lwlxyn�Rlew.A. - a1 e.lAuam¢mrxnw DRIP IRRIGATION AVIh, pf3lAlYrpC �A- rV.Fpl^Fv.GmT0.nmCautl TVIMw 51-m i"JSYfm-IdSflXv IRtgtS Siiv Ivpw yf'gnm�f4Wum. I,w My fvilrc PR• (Uyi,X aiP\n f lith pIv�IWUr�eX=(aID19y1 ilal a, en ioAunlaw A nx`+witv`�}u.rAxl�rw:e,ai�:u,Rm. �j O Az, � vida�d U awo$ W X600 C470�� J Sp >_ scnva MRTGAT1IJ.\' SHEET NO. L-4 HOUGA'HON DETAILS a SHEET NO.Y" L-5 OF 9 NATNE.BACKPILL Z"MIRU.S CLEAN 9A(KFII.LSAO_EUOB AW COMPACTTO9N, LWESIZL'PSTRAINEII VANDALPROOF �IIMSIIGMpC LATERAL LMF MAINLAND. OR SLEEVE �_ NAROSCAPING (will, IN mvlmry n� el so -s) LOCKINGLNCLOSURC IEBEQUIRE➢ tlACNFLOW Pi(L'YfTTER li%ISTINL'BUILDDoOR HEADER d f �1, DATIVE- pACKFlLL13'MWIIs) ! F l ! ) f` ' NO DY GOVCIIfJING ASRf191LY AGEXCY IINISNGRADE EMSS NSL'R - ETSCNSORMOIRO'P[A PLANNOMORE �nWtICUITF0.UM E[ MO DOLL (WARN SPECIFIEOIN I.FAITN O) WHTROLLCRSEE MAMIF.MANWLI BIIRW SPRAYNOZZII 13• f � PVC SCHEDULE SO RIS[R na NM CORTRUL WBF. y SLEEVEURELATCRALLINE 12'M a,y Y W/SLEEVE' 1.1 PRF.SRlMrS11rPLV LINE W/SLEEVE' ' 1 LMin FOR MOUNHNG INSTRUCHONS � hT �FMISII('ItADC y' VDMRISGRIU 1N000 ., ) AIODUI£ pRPYCSCIIEDULEJOCOUPLING CONfRUL\VIRE 1'Min $LFEVERCQUIRE➢ ® CONEWL WIRESLY.. ` BRASS i- BRASS ELLQYp O ORION Il� C] - OND\ERPAVEMTM p ...- $ANO BAC1B'ILL ` - J J (SEE 3'Mirt 1-13'Llin. r '. �` PL1 S)IGATON NOTES DRY.. AC. WIREM 1 s. •': NOrE CLEAN BACKFILL I(Wall Eso[vure dw,nasdjnl= op—supply Imes spuµr6 2PoWER CONOUIHL0 's CON., WNIROL VALVE Nol-PYCSCH[DULESa RISER 1 All pLssllep pin6lvbesrv+kedmRenchn d'Mirt E ANsluv¢IvbeseRJR pvaaMlvb[LlM dvml �dlbe �: S LIX:ATIO\'S-IISING.,t NMROL WCM1E IvSWllhwds l2" _ L Boomed Wpe wmns a110'mlrnals Incmh=Amvm a. _. •, PVCSCHEOULf 9l, TFF.OR R1. above grade in the L Ticalwsct0'(avp inwiangal eM1mSCCf direction lel Nlaa)B°,IlnlicallW Imev¢0 dcammm l6=11Imm uMnemdvays andromma[iil mRicxrys whrnimNxlA6Yimpnm. MALCAOAPTCA BNCR1-f 1i STABIII]ER FlNISHUKAUE i � Inlerie(Of Plaa(Ing Ps uRerallwion I - Me- shall E= exlW.tl kissed iwlvapem Palos as MOM LINEMFO WCMAN L1.. beds. Install heads rbazkfll and sixns HoorforlEck 4.,A,v W bAY rc�a W[ 4lz FROM MRBR [Al ltl•MW. C' do Deet W.P,Eh,Ecalianif compaction reyuirrnlrnB. Ver I& kalaYcdalc,cm4uIsosxR mp==mts anlpmviJca wnkaLmad mudsnfilminP pEem DEPTH ilikim (o buildinhs ovd headers. alFrv+^Jlavel O BACKFLOW PREVENTER DEVICE OD WALL -MOUNT CONTROLLERWITH ET SENSOR PVC LtTERpL O SHRUB SPRAY BUBBLER ( TRENCHING B SLEEVING DETAIL to- ROUND VALVE BOX FMISII GINDE 'QL`I,CVPEN.a.1 (W/PUT1e CaPR Nun P=Iahlo Slmnp (QUIC.KW C'ICVALVE ifIMaI1N RN N\Yal[s Al (Nmtsll I' Sry e NOTE: Install Valve Box so lhN We by of ywuis2"ahase fsuh dein gr° PILSTICYALVED' WITH ATI COV[0.0RANDVE`R.CY.`AN S1'Al1OH :WISH GRADE NUMBEHON C'UVFM ISorvhbu VOlvc aAailM vilh p VivJShlub Rain \Valet Ebveualivn lLlro CONTROLLER UNIT or, . STEELC'NCILSURU 1 nmbarta) gNundeOVereni, l" m lulfmct PLAEUCVALVEBOXWYIH 1¢laimtiw ,mo[id=d • �VANTIALPRWF ONE(11NBIC FEET VJ' I.OLI.InC LID BRANOC➢'GV` (W/rwpl CpCN Y abl Stamp pwvl Sol ModaMxNlc Re,uind CO4iRO1.LER ASSEM }:a •SNEI£CIRICAL 1 .� CXUSI@D NOCK a-FNISH GRADG UNION if1ntl 11N Rml NW rnM ) • CONTRpL VALVE 1 CONAECIOK O'crlard nicr) f cromivu Conlamer IIOVOLT OFFSwar" ' PVC SCIIFLULL PII NSfR -. '.- P.V C MA E �MAPlE0. II•MA% f' lA l' PPVCSTREET F.LL 4'N (arrynueD Y.iF. X JardN W$Yb inigation S}'stemIIGPM1DE �PVCSCHECRA.SN H1 LII IniI.Randm.mwisper H. 11 MU5l DLOCK n (YVCTEf� (ATE VALV E . ... d CmJgcl)mmin(A19) 7D-2858 J`COHCRETGBASH a•° �- •�• j PVCMAIALINE .A 1' 11J bJ.v K�11 � l P.V.C.MAW LME , belwnnnprrl C avd1RnE r AIEII -.- l CONULlT➢16 R5WkF.P PVCSCNEOVLC4a PL1. �+ - _ _-.;.:_ ,... ;: ONCCUBICFOOT PV.CMAMLME I.VC. SCHEUULE4U 3UVAC CONDHfF CLLfONp14 CUMKUL WINtS RUCfUOyn NIPPLE PfA GRpvFA. * NEED: All Plants in POVERCOatalne(s Shall Be N F: All ( b I.Jled us a to lends. p Note: 1.'.116"Tram pD,arest adjamBt paved area TWUNBII'HUUTOF P.v.c Mau ADni•IER (wna, r=gnlrta) P.v(:Tfli Manually Ifligaled Using JardinicT Sub-1Tfigetion Sys. Provldc mmmemWl padlock end two(2)keys m owner. COUPLING VALVE O (GATE VALVE (CONTAINER O ELECTRIC REMOTE CONTROL VALVE T QUICK Bt121GAT[ON (TYP) PEDISTAL-MOUNT CONTROLLER CURB, WALKOR FOUNDATION CAIRN WALKOR FOUNDATION FINISH GRADE FINISHGRADC IDEWALKORCNIB F-34 I` CURn WALKOR FOUNDATION 'ISHORADE FINISHED MIRCHASSPECIELO CRME( d PINISHGRAU 21 i_q d 2 £ MARLIXELL slot MLFf MARIFX Eu sIpF INLCf `. - - � t PVP -VI RUNH y s PprlmsPRAYNEDs >§ '• LL SCHECULEIENIPPLE - nETWEENELLS w SCHEBUViPONIPPLE BETWGFNELIS 9 SWING IOnT P.VC SCHEUUILgR B PVCS('NEUUIE4URIMs 1£ - ' A 2 SCIIEDUI.EJUSWEgGMl £ PCs-UY _r! HOUSING g SCHEUN.EIGSWMGEu POP-UPSPRAY _ 11[AD ~ ELLAN➢STREETEIL PV.0 smurarm SO Airp1E (115>UlM1 nirrqu 2 PYC RCIQDULE"CWS RXT)ANDPY.C.SCHEDUL.E. TNREA➢EDNRPIE PVC SCHFJ]UTAi4U� - DRUEMt)hR L -a P.VC SCHEOU[E PURISER PYC SCHEDI1LESn RISER UV 1`VC. STREETEu STREETE40 __ 1 O.- PNC.SCHEDULEFa NVPtE P.VCSCIIEWLEPUHIPPLE1 j✓° IV.0 IATERALL e. TLE - ` `PLIiC LEE 1 - .. } 1 PWG :(// DRIP LINE IATEW4 LME MANX ELL '•�MARIEXELL IAT RALLIHE P.V.CSCIIEDVLESa RISER COUPLING PvCUIWLME pRIPTUBGGINC LAT[ RAL O POP-UP BUBBLER O SHRUB POP-UP P.VC LAFFEA CIATERA TEE IN EA'ICRAL O POP-UP ROTOR (TURF POP-UP (_DRIP LINE INSTALLATION FINISH GRADe raaovF:FG ��C _)I VALVECS, SLE DRIP LINE ISLAND LAYOUT 'i I 40.CIIROIINp VALVE BnX: TOP OFMIIU'N 1 AIIl RTL01 VALVE KIP FILTER (SEE LEGCNDUN WIIGATION PLAN CO. ME) PVC'MNKRINE REMOTECpN1ROL R[MO(E CONTROL PI UOIRIE FLUSHINGPER PLAN OR POLY SkESPLCS SPECS LINE FLUSHING 1 I VALVE. 1Tf WITH TCCFIUTEKVALVE IL '1 WITH TCCHFILTENAND pl(V L FINISH fiBADli VALV[V[RINH I'LW I/J'PRV __ "" - VALWWITUDISC FILTCRANDPRV ARCAPEMAETER DRIP LINE TURING t l 9 —� LPVCLATERAL MALLIHESTART CONNCCIIOY r "'- MAIL AUAPr[N T \: � DRIPUNH FIT PVC NEUXCER Ars"FOR ITE ` HISEXHAUSTIIEADER) �' SUPPLY FffADCR SX U?- F" h) M111 RIZE AS HEQ'D) (��_F L� -/�' BROOKS PC J yam.J tTIR(F.E[) J ti .s (C' 1-(` TccAbne TUBING �_)"-I �� ISLpNOPENMGIE0. Psi LANOsfAYEpRR'LME 'NBIKG Nat 11 1ft CLEARANM VALVE BU% rY�� >h } a( K —III L I/ i -%i•' l S 3 x3.`�i 1 i'h j / :I F%fIAVSEIfCA➢EIX ➢RIPLMC Tf:EPITTINO S}J YP GRnvEL 1 n_ H TUBAE FWT) t[ tl' Toomm=TEE T's1di BELL r �� YJ+� Ul/��15.'I Yf-}t 3' _ I AINNALUUM RELIEF VALVE {j Ta j'--(FLUMBEOTODRIPLANE ATEAUD y Lq`S'C 1140 BRIEFS PWRT IC Fr PG PVCOR I9LY (L EA CORN[R) GRAVP AL,, RHDBUSIIILGTxT PVCOHLLMC SUPPLY HEADER HIGHPOINHSF.EDFTAR.T' 1T f L UJ .•`12Zf h �V44NCHWASHEDGR\VEL LOW VOLUME CONTROL SYRIEM WITH 314" FILTER AND (u LINCFWSHWGVALVEPLUMHr0 14'PMSUItEREGVU.TORSMIU'GATIONLEGMMK MODEL NUMBER AND DUCRIPHON 1 O AUTONA'fIC LINE FLUSHING VALVE 'fO DRIP LINESIiI!DEfA1L'P' ©AIR/ VACUUM RELlliF VALVE O AIR RELIEF VALVE IN KIT O LOW-VOLUME CONTROL ZONE ASSEMBLY IRREGULAR ( AAREALNE S` TRIANGULAR HOUGA'HON DETAILS a SHEET NO.Y" L-5 OF 9 IRRIGATION SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS Note: The general and specific Conditions of these specifications are an integral part of the landscape Construction documents and must be complied with. 1. GENERAL ' I A. SCOPE OF WORK Provide all labor, materials, equipment, and services necessary to famish and install Irrigation System as shown on the drawings and described herein. B, QUALITY ASSURANCE AND REQUIREMENTS I 1. Permits and Fees The Contractor shall obtain and pay for any and all permits and all inspections as required. 2. Manufacturers Directions Manufacturer's directions and detailed drawings shall be followed in all cases where the manufacturers of materials and articles used in this contract famish directions covering points not shown in the drawings and specifications. 3. Ordinances and Regulations All local, municipal and state laws, and min and regulations in or relating to an portion of this work are hereby incorporated governing g any y rp d de a art of theses specifications and their provisions shall e into an ma p p p b carried out by the Contractor. Anything contained in these specifications shall not be Construed to conflict with any of the above rales and regulations of the same. However, when these specifications and drawings call for or describematerials, workmanship, or construction of a better quality, higher standard, or larger size than is required by the above rales and regulations, the conditions of these specifications and drawings sball take precedence. 4. Explanation of Drawings Contractor is responsible for all offsets, fittings, sleeves, fixtures, and appurtenant devices etc., which may be required for proper operation and construction of the system. Contractor will carefully investigate the structural and finished Conditions affecting all of the work and plan the work accordingly, famishing such fittings; etc., as may be required to meet such conditions. Drawings are generally diagrammatic and indicative of the work to be installed. The work shall be installed in such a manner as to avoid Conflicts between irrigation systems, other utilities planting, and architectural features. - The contractor shall not willfully install the irrigation system as shown on the drawings when it is obvious in the field that unknown abstractions, grade differences or discrepancies in area dimension exist . that might not have been Considered in engineering. Such obstructions or differences should be brought to the attention of the Owner's authorized representative. In the event this notification is not performed, the Contractor shall assume full responsibility for any revision necessary at no additional cost to the Owner. C. SUBMITTALS 1. Material List Famish the articles, equipment, materials or processes specified by name in the drawings sort specification. No substitution will be allowed without prior written approval by the Architect. Substitute equipment or materials installed or furnished without prior approval of the architect may be rejected and the Contractor required to remove such materials from the and replace them with approved materials site at his own expense. Approval of any item, alternate or substitute indicates only that the product or products apparently meet the requirements of the drawings and specifications on the basis of the information or samples I submitted. 2. Record Drawings a. The Contractor shall prepare Record Drawings or As -Built plans showing the final Construction field condition irrigation system b. The Record Drawings/ As -Built plans shall be accurate, legible, and to a measurable scale, i.e.; 1 "=20', 1/8" =P-0" or other standard scale. These drawings are to be prepared on mylar or other reproductive material C. On the Record Drawings/ As-Builts the contractor shall dimension from two permanent points of reference points of reference, building comers, sidewalk, or road intersections; etc., the locations of the following items: (1) Connection to existing water lines. (2) Connection to existing electrical power. (3) Gate valves. (4) Routing of sprinkler pressure lines (dimension max. 100' along routing) (5) Sprinkler control valves. (6) Routing of control wiring. - (7) Quick Coupling valves. (8) Other related equipment as directed by the Architect. it. On orbefore the date of the final inspection, the Contractor shall deliver the corrected and completed Record Drawings/ As-Builts to the Owner. Delivery of theses drawings will not relieve the Contractor of the responsibility of furnishing required information that may be omitted from the prints. 3. Controller Charts a. Record drawings shall be approved by the Architect before controller charts are prepared. b. Provide one controller chart for each controller supplied. c. The chart shall show the area controlled by the automatic controller and shalt be the maximum size which the controller door will allow. d. The chart is to be a reduced drawing of the actual As -Built system. However, in the event the controller sequence is not legible when the drawing is reduced, the information shall be enlarged to a size that will be readable when reduced. c. The circuits shown on the chart shall be color -coded and a different color shall be used to indicate the area of coverage for each controller station. E When Completed and approved, the chart shall be hermetically sealed between two pieces ofplastic, each piece being a minimum 10 mils thick. g. These charts shall be completed and approved prior to final inspection of the irrigation system. 4. Operating and Maintenance Manuals Prepare and deliver operation and maintenance manuals as specified in Division I and as follows: a. Catalog and parts sheets on every material and all equipment installed under this Contract. b. Guarantee statement. c. Complete operating and maintenance instructions on all major equipment. d. In addition to the above mentioned maintenance manuals, provide the Ovme{s maintenance personnel with instructions for major equipment and show evidence in writing to the Architect at the conclusion of the project that this service has been rendered. 5. Equipment to be Famished Supply as a part of this Contract the following tools: a. Two sets of any special tools required for removing, disassembling and adjusting each type of sprinkler and valve supplied on this project. b. Two five-foot valve keys for operation of gate valves. c. Two keys for each automatic controller. d. One quick coupler key and matching hose swivels per four quick coupling valves installed. e. Two sets of operation manuals for automatic Controllers and valves. f. Any other equipment deemed necessary by the Manufacturers instructions to the proper operation of the irrigation system. The above-mentioned equipment shall be tamed over to the Owner at the conclusion of the project. Before final inspection can occur, evidence that Owner has received material must be shown to the Architect. D. PRODUCT DELIVERY, STORAGE AND HANDLING Handling of PVC Pipe and Fittings: The Contractor is cautioned to exercise care in handling, loading unloading, and storing PVC pipe and fittings. Do not subject PVC pipe to undue bending or concentrated external load at any point. Any section ofpipe that has been dented or damaged will be discarded and, if installed, shall be replaced with new piping. E.GUARANTEE The guarantee for the sprinkler irrigation shat] be made in accordance with the form shown below. A copy of the guarantee form shall be included in the operations and maintenance manual. The guarantee form shall be re -typed onto the Contractors letterhead and contain the following information: GUARANTEE FOR SPRINKLER IRRIGATION SYSTEM We hereby guarantee that the sprinkler irrigation system we have famished and installed is free from defects in materials and workmanship, and the work has been completed in accordance with the drawings and specifications, ordinary wear and tour and Consent abuse or neglect excepted. We agree to repair or replace and defects in material or workmanship which may develop during the period of one year from date of acceptance and also to repair or replace any damage resulting from the repairing or replacing of such defects at no additional cost to the Owner. We shall make such repairs or replacements within reasonable time, as determined by the Owner, after receipt of written notice. In the event of our failure to make such repairs or replacements within a reasonable time offer receipt of written notice from the Owner, we authorize the Owner to proceed to have said repairs or replacements made at our expense and we will pay the costs and charges therefor upon demand. PROJECT: Contractor ADDRESS: PHONE: DATE OF ACCEPTANCE: HPRODUCTS A. MATERIALS L General: Use only new materials of brands and types noted on drawings, specified herein, or approved equals. 2. PVC Pressure Main Line Pipe suit Fittings a. Pressure main line piping for all sizes shall be PVC Class 315 for 2" and larger, schedule 40 for 1-1/2" and smaller. b. Pipe shall be made from NSF approved type 1, Grade I PVC compound conforming to ASTM resin specification 1785. All pipe shall meet requirements as set forth in Federal Specifications PS -21-70. Solvent -weld pipe). C. PVC solvent weld fittings shall be Schedule 40, 1-2, E-1 NSF approved conforming to ASTM test procedure D2466. d. Solvent cement and primer for PVC solvent -weld pipe and fittings shall be of type and installation methods prescribed by the manufacturer. e. All PVC pipe shall bear the following markings: (1) Manufacturer's name. (2) Nominal pipe size. (3) Schedule or Class. (4) Pressure rating in PSI. (5) NSF (National Sanitation Foundation) approval. E All fittings shall bear the manufacturer's name or trademark material designation, size, applicable I.P.S. schedule and NSF seal of approval. 3. PVC Nan -Pressure Lateral Line Piping a. Non -pressure buried lateral line piping shall be PVC schedule 40 with solvent weldjoints. b. Pipe shall be made from NSF approved, Type 1 Grade 11 PVC c compound Conforming to ASTM resin specification D1784. All pipe shall meet requirements set forth in Federal Specification PS -22-70, with an appropriate standard dimension ratio. c. Except as noted in section 11-A2, a & b, all requirements for non -pressure lateral line pipe and fittings shall be the same as for solvent -weld pressure main line pipe and fittings as set forth in s section E -A-2 of these specifications. 4. UVR I PVC Pipe on Grade a. All pipe on grade shall be schedule 40 LIVE/ PVC pipe. b. All pipe and fittings shall bear a permanent identifiable label of "Brownline UVR/ PVC. The piping and installation shall be in accordance with the requirements of the latest edition of the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials (IAPMO) Standard IS -8. c. All lateral piping shall be installed on the surface and anchored at I V O:C. by a 93 rebar with a "1" hooked radius driven 24" into solid ground. d. Horizontal piping stakes shall be within 12" of the sprinkler riser. e. Each pipe riser serving a sprinkler head shall be anchored by a riser stabilizer assembly constructed of #4 rebar driven 24" into solid ground and fastened to the riser by two (2) galvanized or stainless steel bands. f. All risers and fittings used on UVR IPVC pipe shall be IFS_ schedule 40 or 80 as manufactured by " Brownline Pipe C.o.". S. Brass Pipe and Fittings a. Where indicated on the drawings, use red brass screwed pipe conforming to Federal Specification #W W -P-351. b. Fittings shall be red brass conforming to Federal Specification #WW -P-060. 6. Gate Valves a. Gate valves 3" and smaller shall h Il be 125 lb. SW P bronze gate valve with screw-in = o boon et, non -rising stem and solid wedge disc. b. Gate valves 3" smaller shall be threaded Cods and shall be equipped with a bronze handwheel. c. Gate valve 3" and smaller shall be similar to those manufactures by Nibco or approved equal. d. All gate valves shall be installed per installation detail. 7. Quick Coupling Valves - a. Quick Coupling valves shall have a brass two-piece body designed for working pressure of 150 P.S.I. 8. Backflow Prevention Units a. Backflow prevention units shall be of size and type indicated on the irigation drawings. Install backflow prevention units in accordance with irrigation constructions details, and local prevailing codes. b. Wye Strainers at backflow prevention units shat] have a bronzed screwed body with 60 mesh model screen and shall be Watts 9777 or approved equal. 9. Check Valves Anti -drain valves shall be of heavy-duty virgin PVC construction with F.I.P. thread inlet and outlet. Internal parts shag be stainless steel and neoprene. Anti -drain valves shall be field adjustable again draw out from 5 to 40 feet of head. The anti -drain valve shall be similar to the Voice, ADV or approved equal. 10. Control Wiring a. Connections between the automatic Controllers and the electric control valves shall be made with direct burial copper wire AWG -0.F. 600 volt. Pilot wires shall be a different color wire from each automatic controller. Common wires shall be white with a different color stripe for each automatic controller. Install in accordance with valve manufacturer's specifications and wire chart. in accuse shall wire size be less than #14. b. Wiring shall occupy the same trench and shall be installed along the same route as pressure supply or lateral lines whereverpossible. c. Where mom than one (1) vivre is placed in a trench, wiring shall be taped together at intervals of ten (10) feet. 'd. An expansion curl shall be provided within Duce (3) feet of each wire connection. Expansion curl shall be of sufficient length so that in case of repair, the valve bonnet may be brought to the surface without disconnection of the control wires. Control wires shat] be laid loosely in trench without stress or stretching of control wire conductors. e. All splices shall be made with Scotch -Lok #3576 Connector Sealing Packs, Rainbird snap -rite connector, or approved equal. Use one splice per connector sealing pack. CONTINUED ON SHEET L4 Z a¢o° dos W nao M C,g J o'n W has I.IGAmai srsarcnnous SHEETNO. L-6 OF a 11. Automatic Controllers a. Automatic controllers and climate sensors and flow sensors shall be of size and type shown on the Plans. b. Final location of automatic controllers shall be approved by the Owner's authorized representative. c- Unless otherwise noted on the plans, the 120 volt electrical power • to the automatic controller location to be furnished by others. The coordination with Electrical Contractor and final electrical hook-up shall be the responsibility of the irrigation contractor. it. The contractor is responsible for properly programming the controller inconjunction with specified sensors. Coordinate with the manufacturer for any needed assistance. 12. Electric Control Valves a. All electric control valves shall have a manual flow adjustment. b. Provide and install one control valve box for each electric control I valve. 13. Control Valve Boxes a. Use 9 by 24 inch round box for all gate valves, Brooks 99 or approved equal. b. Use 9-1/2 by 16 by I 1 -inch rectangular box for all electrical control valves, Carson Industries 1419-12B or approved equal. 14. Sprinkler Heads - a. All sprinkler heads shall be of the same size, type, and deliver the same rate of precipitation with the diameter (or radius) of throw, pressure, and discharge as shown on the plans and/or specified on these special provisions. b. Spray heads shall have a screw adjustment. c. Riser units shall he fabricated in accordance with the details. d. Riser nipples for all sprinkler heads shall be the same size as the riser opening in the sprinkler head. III. EXECUTION A. INSPECTION 1. Site Conditions a. All scaled dimensions are approximate. The contractor shall check and verify all size dimensions and receive Architect's approval prior to proceeding with work under this Section. b. Exercise extreme cue in excavating and working near utilities. Contractor shalt be responsible for damages to utilities which are caused by his operation or neglect. Check existing utilities drawings for existing utility locations. c. Coordinate installation of sprinkler irrigation materials, including pipe, so them shall be no interference with utilities or other construction or difficulty in planting trees, shrubs, or groundcovers. B. PREPARATION L Physical Layout a. Prior to installation, the Contractor shall stake out all pressure supply lines, routing and location of sprinkler heads. b. All layout shall be approved by Architect prior to trenching. 2. Water Supply a. Sprinkler irrigation system shall be connected to water supply points of connections as indicated on the drawings. 3. Electrical Supply a. Electrical connections for automatic controller shall be made to electrical points of connections as indicated on the drawings. I. Contractor is responsible for minor changes caused by actual site conditions. C. INSTALLATION 1. Trenching f a. Dig trenches straight and support pipe continuously on sand or native bedding at bottom of trench. Remove all stones or sharp objects from trench. Lay pipe to an even guide. Trenching excavation shall follow layout indicated on drawings and as noted. b. Provide for a minimum of eighteen (18") inches cover for all pressure supply lines. e. Provide for a minimum cover of (12") inches for all non -pressure lines. d. Provide for minimum cover of eighteen (18") inches for all control wining. 2. Backfilling a. The trenches And not be backfilled until all required tests are performed. Trenches shall be carefully backfilled with the excavated material approved by the Soils Engineer for backfilling consisting of earth, loam, sandy clay, sand, or other approved materials, free from Inge clods of earth or stones. Backfill shall be compacted in landscape areas to a dry density equal to adjacent undisturbed Boit in planting areas. Backfill will conform to adjacent grades without dips, sunken, areas, humps or other surface irregularities. b. No foreign matter larger than one-half (1/2) inch in size will be permitted in the initial backfill. c. Flooding of trenches will be permitted only with the approval of the Soils Engineer and Architect. d If settlement occurs and subsequent adjustments in pipe, valves sprinkler heads, lawn or planting, or other construction am necessary, the Contractor shall make all required adjushncmi, without cost to the Owner. 3. Trenching and Backfill Under Paying a. Trenches located under areas of paving, asphaltic concrete shall be backfilled with sand ( a layer six inches below the pipe and three inches above the pipe) and compacted in layers to 90% left flush with the adjoining grade. The sprinkler irrigation Contractor shall set in place, cap and pressure test all piping under paving prior to the paving work b. Generally, piping under existing walks is done byjackmg, boring or hydraulic driving, but where any cutting or breaking of sidewalks and or concrete is necessary, it shall be done and replaced by the Contractor as part of the Contract cost. Permission to cut or break sidewalks and or concrete shall be obtained from the Property Owner. c. Provide for a minimum cover of twenty-four inches between the top of the pipe and the bottom of the aggregate base for all pressure and non-pressum piping installed under asphaltic concrete paving. 4. Assemblies a. Routing of sprinkler irrigation lines as indicate on the drawing is diagrammatic. Install lines and various assemblies to confirm with the details shown on drawings. b. Install no multiple assemblies on plastic lines. Provide each assembly with its own outlet. c. Install all assemblies specified herein in accordance with respective detail. In absence of detail drawings or specifications pertaining to specific items required to complete work, perform, such work in accordance with best standard practice with prior approval of Architect. it. PVC pipe and fittings shall be thoroughly cleaned of dirt, dust, and moisture before installation. Installation and solvent -welding methods shall be as recommended by the pipe and fittings manufacture. e. On PVC to metal connections, the Contractor sball work the metal connections first. Teflon tape or approved equal shall be used on all threaded PVC to PVC, and on all threaded PVC to metal joints. Light wrench pressure is all that is required. Where threaded PVC connections are required use threaded PVC adapters into which the pipe may be welded. 5. Line Clearance a. All lines shall have a minimum clearance of six inches from each other. Parallel lines shall not be installed directly over one another. No other trades are allowed in same trench with irrigation pipe 6. Automatic Controller a. Install controller in a vandal -proof enclosure. b. Install as per manufacturer's instructions. Remote control valves shall be connected to controller in numerical sequences shown on the drawing. c. Automatic controllers shall be of size and type shown on the plans. d. Final location of automatic controllers shall be approved by the Owner's authorized representative. e. Unless otherwise noted on the plans, the 120 volt electrical power to the automatic controller location to be famished by others. The final electrical hook-up shall be the responsibility of the irrigation contractor. I. Remote Control Valves hlstall where shown on drawings and details. When grouped together, allow at least twelve inches between valves. Install each remote control valve in a separate valve box. 8. Flushing of System a. After all new sprinkler pipe lines and risers are inplace and connected, all necessary diversion work has been completed and prior to installation of sprinkler heads the control valves shall be opened and a full head of water used to flush out the system. b. Sprinkler heads shall be installed only after flushing of the system has been accomplished to the complete satisfaction of the Architect 9. Sprinkler Heads a Install the sprinkler beads as designated on the drawings. Sprinkler heads to be installed in this work shall be equivalent in all respects to those itemized. b. Spacing of heads shall not exceed the maximum indicated on the drawings. In no case shall the spacing exceed the maximum recommended by the manufacturer. D. TEMPORARY REPAIRS a. The Owner reserves the right to make temporary repairs as necessary to keep the sprinkler system equipment in operating condition. The exercise of this right by the builder -Developer shall not relieve the Contractor of his responsibilities under the terms of the guarantee as herein specified. - - E. FIELD QUALITY CONTROL 1. Adjustment of the System a. The Contractor shall flush and adjust heads for optimum performance and to prevent overspmy onto walks, roadways, walls fences, windows, and buildings as much as possible. b. If it is determined that adjustments in the irrigation equipment will provide proper and more adequate coverage, the Contractor shat] make such adjustments prior to planting. Adjustments may also include changes in nozzle sizes and degrees of are as required. c. Lowering raised sprinkler heads by the Contractor shall be accomplished within ten days after notification by Owner. it. All sprinkler heads shall be set perpendicular to finished grades unless otherwise designated on the plans. 2. Testing of Irigation System a. The Contractor shall request the presence of the Architect in writing at least 48 hours in advance of testing. b. Test all pressure lines under hydrostatic pressure of 150 pounds per square inch and prove watertight. NOTE: Testing of pressure main lines shall occur prior to installation of electric control valves. c. All piping under paved areas shall be tested under hydrostatic pressure of 150 pounds per square incl] and proved watertight prior to paving. d. Sustain pressure in lines for not less than two hours for laterals and 4 hours for mainlines. If leaks develop, replace joints and repeat test until entire system is proven water -tight. e. All hydrostatic tests shall be made only in the presence of the Architect and City Landscape Inspector or other duly authorized roprescntative of the Owner. No pipe shall be backfilled until it has been inspected, tested and approved in writing and shall be re -tested after backfill operations are complete. E Famished necessary force pump and all other test equipment. g. When the sprinkler irrigation system is completed, perform a coverage test in the presence of the Architect to determine if the water coverage for planting areas is complete and adequate. famish all materials and perform all work required to correct any inadequacies of coverage due to deviations from plans or where the system has been willfully installed as indicated on the drawings when it is obviously inadequate without bringing this to the attention of the Architect. This lest shall be accomplished before any groundcover is planted. h. Upon completion of each phase of work, the entire system shall be tested and adjusted to meet site requirements. F. MAINTENANCE 1. The entire sprinkler irrigation system shall be under full automatic operation for a period of seven days prior to any planting. 2. The Architect reserves lire right to waive or shorten the operation period. G. CLEAN-UP Clean -Up shall be made as each portion of work pmgesses. Refuse and excess dirt shall be removed from the site, all walks and paving shall be broomed or winshed down, and any damage sustained to the site or the work of others shall be repaired to its original condition. H. FINAL OBSERVATION PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE 1. The Contractor shalt operate each system in its entirety for the Architect at time of final observation. Any items deemed not acceptable by the Observer shall be reworked to the complete satisfaction of the Architect. 2. The Contractor shall show evidence to the Architect that the Owner has received all accessories, charts, record drawings, and equipment as required before final observation can occur. 1. OBSERVATION SCHEDULE 1. Contractor shall be responsible for notifying the Architect in Advance for the following observations according to the time indicated: a. Pre -Job Conference - 7 days b. Pressure supply line installation and testing -4 days c. Automatic Controller installation - 4 days. d. Control wire installation - 4 days e. Lateral line and sprinkler installation - 4 days f Coverage lest - 4 days g. Final observation - 7 days 2. When inspections have been conducted by other than the Architect, show evidence of when and by whom these inspections were made. 3. No observation shall commence without As -Built drawings. In the event the Contractor calls for an observation without As -Built drawings, without completing previously noted corrections, or without preparing the system for observations, he shall be responsible for reimbursing the Architect at the hourly rate in effect at the time the observation, portal to portal plus transportation cost. Subsequent inspections will not be performed until this charge is paid. of Z$vg O o6N a3oy Ug»Sa (Agri. O. 6 Do w iwu opw ,vo IRRIGA'nON sracmICATIONS SHEEF NO. L-7 OF 9• i PLANT LIST YNCOLSMEA4 IRCFS: �^111A4 w ArE0.Fm M m.T4ftWast KLDFNYK Niw^vl kYP.Tc Yc0 i eFu�TYFENB uw`c�EEs -�9 fH"s'ra¢u�:uGw..vYsl�o�rlkvnl �EGiA�S.'rnna i:m% _ rtw Ew�mNanrsrEcwlc�vun;Nr, wn 2 RATNtKv2V34 W:iF Mm ds ¢ftM163n2SYC :YrTTX LOk PrT FK4FEa.i�E NOhsiICBEUnI`T0.] N➢J. rtR4T'ld9Xi\Mq'W X6l% Mm [ SHPVBS: MpNxNPE W iMs¢X.. MviaWUJW'vU M4.Yz. 11 BSSlIK.LFP V.KLLA' US£V C4CieMt1EF V3LCY LIXI� B-0]fi Ygiq .T1tJ�IGGaEENBFALR'! BFNM6C U]D nLL Y cP USNSPS[aP.ELG�0. iFM .I0./E£O1tlEfi f2UlJP0.5 tl.WPf.O]ftG:E W'I 2R%LNFFMV � U iGP11A NR �B NAFEP[lf$YMIFGFTP' ¢I;UR i V11¢I YRv¢%£1V MCM94Tx�OSSK 1 'GVt¢! LUV JA-iX�gSNv.FiE.NN(f1U4 Ii E:MTYIM UeI. r4NV¢1911ER5¢F ,BHI.IXi G:Y GPPr4FA YSK}I: sGVydl INI (¢vR^F,1�B 1EA£Ailc{PtaWtmF YELL^vx0<YL4Y SfµLq! �1 rtxPF"Y{tRz 1i tsVU4W GEl?PiACNGCVy^ GPAI'U�41SEa 1GHtrM U\FLAP. F6 tM UWtlw4441M1INR 54+ILLCW 1�cRcsfl"Rux. Tim M WxN xlPta �}f}Uap1F}!P� 1G+llm1 LON 9ry kVE� TM INWUNUIS/:£ LCWTMIMTIXxAM 'FYnS pIfJE'f 5G'L¢! LlW fY. xYECYpMEA Ctarrt LtYIJPF 1[UI(xi WA � L[KWIE�aw uUgl7F 5[/461 EMC :HltHIU�u IPF!µC»Rpta;El! cxF,recEYlvr _ wV. cF[ME�wrtFwxv. 5GN1IX1 s�iW NYJ �Fo " Nu. i! B'FP vlsEifFS cxAFP iCiFA 5f Nl itssSMMvIPIpHNtOrF4 PFG P'.Saggv9AtN£M1SV Wf&'ISIWW eA:I vF1bxAWKdI R:F'E�� LLtl1 54NiW Ilr4 16 a:sa fl.Ml¢€AN'FiBEPP' F¢ pRNrIA£iW Ci TE:mSE �dV�l n4P3cMHi HEl3 RM 0.T r fYVynl44'£ +' 4M NL9 L¢Y 9� NE%r B/aN SAGE ;;cL« �I F�c.wnw mf srswrossumu woes Eu's , Y�xl n VINES%ESVpIIERS: HO. 4rY. frs Prtusl(q\n4nMi1ESP.VCF1 EYFFGPI�IlFFAu u4W.W �A Cry [meD OHD MEfl: 0.GNNts - WI\re�PE4. UKIr SFW SW: 4prwN .W yVRia`O FA PIAVs T KR OFE4IAL _enaYRJ BK{lf4.O! El Nn SIFEPq uiS[Y ME0.4 M i 'YINMEE NNI` 1G41+Xl Wv+aF3A'agYa 44 LOX ©.. 2KGsa'Ia YW.nLLAi4 RAWE4 1csLLRl W'RPUIFK@tCOG L¢N F GSNaxwwnv.,�rui�F F4Ymfarzrv\.:sesrnc fav rmc.srelcGN..csrus ,c.l.wlmRwFFag+.'o4 fuv /.' w.cw`xmroas .uw.v� Lao.J�msa �roG \Lw rJI�nAHmuuvwE:lf�o-. mvr�cmvss�,rar. LNraw_xY.n>H�F. AIxuPP eA.z cs@arm .a. iN:n•eu.cw'Jw N�.eLtxfi Pvpm f f 2�SG M'I:OF@NOc. tRv POTLEGEND L:s uT,.w, oa�,l ew�.w,sm.ww p Y.xS alr5 � sJNs..�e" :a�o.YP�.Nwieo� ��""u O room cxcRmKwwwrxwN.v16.REF1 roLr vuuwMamamEs t[oroYJx OO .�bwwL�i seam :..r �o�..r �tceRmn wrz .oB°�e"rwa.BOUT'u`Y"\P®B1m.srncSvwlLeueiEdn*m . «w,iN KCB., m,r«.e�K reGroK�1 �' 1co15 mrL°'BOnI�GwN'tw.�'L+noua'`�zxw.L"'eaKms 1 �rEafNl.wxPYm f..B.,K m us N¢`�p1wmE�'uwFn«F'�` z ronPv.%.rve coovnw BAeuwruML MVIQ24xaumBl ` s1.Lmwism,: _— uKK,uG\rKx6v4Twl0.RPLm�'sGEmAawmcNK AxulviAw WGtROYwNw+mw w,r.eEwcru,� wJAtmPEalxseJSSlws@wL [crm+� usNwwNRwluwSlNATawusimY�ie®xiwxG�`"�wwwo°"iovroL NLH mm:wrnrwxlEcwaBBEs romNBsamxva,mnsmEsxvx uouwsnn°Pm a °n �c'PE wlwmro lN`uNwNx-w.vTxKIXI�.YFamresm R fltBE118 P.DGY L°�1V<• L-8 %1 �J£t M�1 PLPMI 6L � ON �— n 51NL9 PLANNNS oN _ wumow`Pww ou.U.m.� ILP wmue"'�xxn.n� EM 8 DN2LE w- --f �' 5�IE ONLY '�' o n �A�ax ekvoa J w Z w a ' y t 0 0�� a90 tuna;°o w -' ❑.m (J¢7 H Jou �o PI "NG DMIp aaresirxr. NONE L-9 m�"NmaR wn.� %1 �J£t M�1 PLPMI 6L � ON �— n 51NL9 PLANNNS oN _ wumow`Pww ou.U.m.� ILP wmue"'�xxn.n� EM 8 DN2LE w- --f �' 5�IE ONLY '�' o n �A�ax ekvoa J w Z w a ' y t 0 0�� a90 tuna;°o w -' ❑.m (J¢7 H Jou �o PI "NG DMIp aaresirxr. NONE L-9 F Z w a LL a m� Z LL 0a Q C 6 LL LL 0LC F- 2 z w n z of 0a nw z w co w z ¢ ¢ � =Q�QU �z SJFz S U10w—U) ma Oz�� a-0aga u z n u n u S ii : UaU a X a a¢ U 0 Z w U' w J m' r U'. m m m m 0 0 0 0 aN 0 0 0 0 m m m m o r r - - QA 0 C) 0�p 0 0 � 3 N U d d U S S S a, o a a a y, E E E E U U y U C U C C C �', U�`Oii i1 d N d N U E U E U E U E E ¢ c ¢ c 5 i. c? Elie Mg �u % Y' v.= E a 0 m t ocl > N z (7 ¢ ''. z z ((j Q z (D z C7 ¢ .a., ItIt N M M AoNV q) OO U ..Ute,c>.. a a a a U)- ° rr a a. a r ¢ v LU o a LU LU j m m LU U C C Z 0 O 0 N .E m J' J or 0 J - mNc� TCd UM M m N K @ N O co o=o E �_n wN o U N N- —FhN@- O B @ @ UUMoO U .5 a =x NNE G .'. Ql¢- NRUE UpCTN rC UONO> C«`pz m 0 N UR E UN m O w a w7 m rE@N w (❑a� mO � _ a( �O O U U N3 Z w z m e E Z 3 0r tNG :NNCa N cz NNz N� O Z w NN N NQ a , z of 0a nw z w co w z ¢ ¢ � =Q�QU �z SJFz S U10w—U) ma Oz�� a-0aga u z n u n u S ii : UaU a X a a¢ U 0 Z w U' w J N N a z Z W F- LU Q a m � ❑ z 2 a Q O LL O LL y c F- F U z C L 1-1 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ m @ m m @ C G C C C C C C G O C O O 0 C O C O C O +- - O `o O -o O a O `o O -o O v O `o O v -o v v -o v 'o o o 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o woo 0 o - m m m m m m m m m rn m rn m rn �_ 1 «• w r+ w �+ r w CC C C C C C C C C C C C C O OOp O O �O�p �Op �O�pp �O�pp �Op U �Op U N �O�pp U �Op U �O�pp U �O�pp U �Y ,_ O. 0. O_ •O. O. �. d Q OQ Q Q d Q d @ @ m m @ m @ @ m @ @ @ @ N m N @ N @ @ d N N OJ N N N d 4',„. @ d m U o m m @ m m m U m @ �� K"Ta;- E E E E E E E EEEEEEE O O O O N U N U U U U U OU U - O O O O O 00 0000000 m @ @ @ @ m m m @ @ @ m m d °:4.. ' 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0000 00 •`-iieew':,f'=i cNCC cNc@@ cm_cNO cm�UC 0 'mFr3dMMJU�CN_,+j m> 0 0 0 0 c 00 CvFc7rNJa`- wc@NU 0 vc@vNU ✓ C'0 G0 �cvmUN >tZE6 'yc GOaFcNNNJLL❑E- i€cma�wc�N CFqNNJac@❑Nm- CUMtOOJLL❑ch' :c_vNN• C'0 iGc-UC CQJ�VNJ '2 2 E �E9E .9 E�E�E orc@aUN• oC o a° w aa2 Q Q Q Q Q Q Q C Q N YNFc(N❑O- mFcVo❑NC- _'W_ONJa�c❑m3mm' Q '`- g 00 0 2 U U >o Un 'X ``-X'�4';v'�'-q;t_•T__ m m o0 FtNcMONJQ❑0- FMc[JaOV- FNNMc�(�a- FOOOcJ❑@- FMMOLL❑3- FMO_�cOnp@- F- O Z z z Z ZZzzzQzzQzzU `±0y �am (00 5s =.; ' .. kryt. : N N NOM ,` O O O N ma._ 0_ U+c LL aFc- Of w , p . h ❑ ❑ C N n) l W a Uaxi •E '@ .E m m m m m E E m N �+ 2 N LU @— m m m C C C N •l0 E 'FU= Y@ Y E m m m m C @@ m O N @@ N ._ C-0 U , WO a. Ew E O:o o E U c �Cd @''-- � E o� o�O' o @ E 0 E 3 O m 0 m0 @ O N N N N ”6 O C Z C @ C O aL O O Ca FE- D o U N 0.2 U Z O'+ O1_ ❑ N Z 3 0 o U ' M d' �O 3 N N 00U 1� — U W O M {6 M N a a M N �- Z O 0 N Z f0 a M Q M UI 1 Z N N O Z M ;� O LL, V@ m O M O a V Q a O Q a N Q a M Q M Z N M N cL d � Y N Q e- N N M �O (D N N N N N :. <of Z Z w 0 <0 0 w > F- w K/ L)U) '151 7� 0 0 c > cc Z CL 0 � �}\ > 2b Z t; /§\- .6 LU — 2(\ L 0, 0- a- zw <of Z Z w 0 <0 0 w > F- w K/ L)U) '151 7� 0 0 c > Z 0 F- L)U) 0 0 c > CL 0 > 2b Z t; /§\- .6 LU — 2(\ L 0, 0- a- CITY OF DIAMOND BAR NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING AND AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ) I, Stella Marquez, declare as follows: On September 24, 2013, the Diamond Bar Planning Commission will hold a regular session at 7:00 p.m., at City Hall, Windmill Community Room, 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California. Items for consideration are listed on the attached agenda. am employed by the City of Diamond Bar. On September 20, 2013, a copy of the agenda of the Regular Meeting of the Diamond Bar Planning Commission was posted at the following locations: South Coast Quality Management District Auditorium 21865 East Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Diamond Bar Library 21800 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Heritage Park 2900 Brea Canyon Road Diamond Bar, CA 91765 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on September 20, 2013, at Diamond Bar, California. Community Development CDAntelWaffidavi[posting.doc Good Evening Board Members September 24, 2013 I apologize for not being here tonight but a family matter has taken my attention out of town. My name is Victor Bermudez and I reside at 1129 Flintlock Rd Diamond Bar CA with my wife Nancy. I have lived here and enjoyed this Beautiful city for 22 years since 1991.1 am very much opposed to the rezoning and construction of a new office facility directly across from my back yard. I will be concise and to the point on 3 issues regarding this matter: 1. There are already many vacant offices along Diamond Bar Blvd from the once Shell Gas Station that has not reopened in many years, to Kmart barley hanging on with the threat of possibly closing, the Acapulco restaurant site closed for many years and all along North Diamond Bar Blvd to Highland Valley Rd. Much of the available office space has remained empty for many years. To propose yet another office building in the middle of a residential area is not logical. Granted it would be a nice spot because it has a view but would be at our neighborhoods expense because it would be taking from the view we have all enjoyed for many years. It most likely will fall prey to the same condition of the other office buildings and be empty after a few years. We do not need another empty office building. The company can find another spot. 2. Based on real estate sales and surveys, our homes have an average of a 10% increase in value because of our view. If you allow the construction of this building, it will lower the value of our homes should we find ourselves in a position to sell and move. Who is going to compensate us all if this building is allowed and our property values drop. My guess is the City would be responsible since it allowed the construction in the first place. I for one will not be moving but I relish the view I have and do not want to see another empty building in my back yard. I am sure the City would not want to be caught up in a lawsuit over this matter regarding our home values. 3. Around the later 1980's the home at 1148 Flintlock Rd had to be completely rebuilt from the ground up because of foundation settlement problems due to underground streams running through the hills we live on. 1142 Flintlock Rd has also been affected in that they recently had to rebuild the foundation at the edge of its garage which also had foundation settlement problems. It had to be repaired before it was sold. I myself also had to reinforce my hill about 10 years ago when heavy rains caused a small slide on my hill directly across from the proposed location. Further research proved that the streams continue in a diagonal direction towards the very property of the proposed building. If built, it will be in close proximity to the edge of the hill causing additional stress to the entire hillside. The possibility of a hill failure increases due to the added tonnage on the edge of this hill which could eventually cause it to be compromised and subsequently slide. This would compromise our homes and again leave the City responsible for allowing the construction. Yet another possibility for a lawsuit that the City does not need. I erg you all, on behalf of all us, your constituents that this company does not need to build on this site and take away from our beautiful view. They can find another location where they will not be obstructing anyone else's view. Thank you for your time Victor M and Nancy M Bermudez 1129 Flintlock Rd Diamond Bar CA 91765 Home 909-396-0882 Cell 909-319-3275 VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM: SUBJECT' TO: Planning Commission DATE SPEAKER NAME:L ADDRESS: ll ( %l NrG.00`c AZO (Please print clearly) l would like to address the Planning Commission on the above stated item. Please have the Commission Minutes reflect my name and address as printed above Signature Note: This form is intended to assist the Chairman in ensuring that all persons wishing to address the Commission will have the opportunity to do so, and to ensure correct spelling of names in the Minutes. After completion, please submit your form to the Planning Commission Secretary. Thank you. VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM: v SUBJECT: TO: Planning Commission DATE: J SPEAKER NAME: ADDRESS: (Please MW l would like to address the Planning Commission on the Minutes reflect my name and address as printed above Note: This form is intended to assist the Chairman in Commission will have the opportunity to do so, � 5 1--iA CTL item. Please l the Commission ig that all persoltwishing to address the ensure correct spelling of names in the Minutes. After completion, please submit your form to the Planning Commission Secretary. Thank you.