HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/27/1998CU
ISI PLANNING
NOT REMOVE
COMMISSION
AGENDA
OCTOBER 27, 1998
7:00 P.M.
South Coast Air Quality Management
Auditorium
21865 East Copley Drive
Diamond Bar, California
Chairman
vice Chairman
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
District
Joe McManus
Steven Tye
George Kuo
Steve Nelson
Joe Ruzicka
Copies of staff reports or other written documentation relating to agenda items are on Me in the Planning
Division of the Dept. of Community & Development Services, located at 21660 E Copley Drive, Suite 190,
and are! available for public inspection. If you have questions regarding an agenda item, please call
(909) 396-5676 during regular business hours.
In an effort to comply with the requirements of Title ll of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the
,ty o and Bar requires that any person in need of any type of special equipment, assistance or
accomodation(s) i order to communicate at a City public meeting must inform the Dept. of Community &
evelopment Services at (909) 396-5676 a minimum of 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting.
RU3! W.kGH DA4W
Please refmin rain from smoking, caring or drinking The City of Diamond Bar uses recycled paper
in the Auditorium mss! and encourages you to do the same.
City of Diamond Bar
Planning Commission
MEETING RULES
PUBLIC INPUT
The meetings of the Diamond Bar Planning Commission are open to the public. A member of the public may address
the Commission on the subject of one or more agenda items and/or other items of which are within the subject matter
jurisdiction of the Diamond Bar Planning Commission. A request to address Commission should be submitted in
writing at the public hearing, to the Secretary of the Commission.
As a general rule the opportunity for public comments will take place at the discretion of the Chair. However, in order
to facilitate the meeting, persons who are interested parties for an item may be requested to give their presentation at the
time the item is called on the calendar. The Chair may limit individual public input to five minutes on any item; or the
Chair may limit the total amount of time allocated for public testimony based on the number of people requesting to
speak and the business of the Commission.
Individuals are requested to conduct themselves in a professional and buisinesslike manner. Comments and questions
are welcome so that all points of view are considered prior to the Commission making recommendations to the staff and
City Council.
In accordance with Government Code Section 54954.3(a) the Chair may from time to time dispense with public
comment on items previously considered by the Commission.
In accordance with State Law (Brown Act), all matters to be acted on by the Commission must be posted at least 72
hours prior to the Commission meeting. In case of emergenct or when a subject matter arises subsequest to the posting
of the agenda, upon making certain findings, the Commission may act on item that is not on the posted agenda
INFORMATION RELATING TO AGENDAS AND ACTIONS OF THE COMMISSION
Agendas for Diamond Bar Planning Commission meetings are prepared by the Planning Division of the Community
and Development Services Department. Agendas are available 72 hours prior to the meeting at City Hall and the
public library, and may be accessed by personal computer at the number below.
Every meeting of the Planning Commission is recorded on cassette tapes and duplicate tapes are available for a nominal
charge.
ADA REQUIREMENTS
A cordless microphone is available for those persons with mobility impairments who cannot access the public speaking
area. The service of the cordless microphone and sign language interpreter services are available by giving notice at
least three business days in advance of the meeting. Please telephone (909)396-5676 between 8:00a m. and 5:00p.m.
Monday through Friday.
HELPFUL PHONE NUMBERS
Copies of Agenda, Rules of the Commission, Cassette Tapes of Meetings (909) 396-5676
Computer Access to Agendas (909) 860 -LINE
General Agendas (909) 396-5676
email: info@ci.diamond-bar.ca.us
PLANNING CONMUSSION
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
Tuesday, October 27, 1998
AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 p.m.
Neat Resolution No. 98-22
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
1. ROLL. CALL: COMMISSIONERS: Chairman Joe McManus, Vice Chairman Steve
Tye, Joe Ruzicka, George Kuo, and Steve Nelson.
2. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS:
This is the time and place for the general public to address the members of the Planning Commission on
any item that is within their jurisdiction, allowing the public an opportunity to speak on non-public
hearing and non -agenda items. Please comm - e a neal='s Card for the recording Secret= (Completion
of thi form is volunta_rvl There is a five minute maximum time limit when addressing the Planning
Commission,
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Chairman
4. CONSENT CALENDAR:
The following items listed on the consent calendar are considered routine and are approved by a
single motion. Consent calendar items may be removed from the agenda by request of the
Commission only:
4.1 Minutes of. September 15, 1998, September 22, 1998, and October 13, 1998
5. OLD BUSINESS: None
6. NEW BUSINESS: None
7. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: None
c: \wp51 *enWp1wwiug\laZ7.99
8. PUBLIC HEARING: None
Ch1 i� e�i7i ►� i�� i �'� C��:�K� ZY*1
10. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
Public Hearing dates of future projects
Verbal report on status of Development Code project
11. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS:
TELECOMMUNICATIONS TASK FORCE- October 28, 1998 - 6:30 p.m.
SCAQMD 21865 E. Copley Drive - CC -8
COMMUNITY CENTER TASK FORCE- October 28, 1998 - 6:30 p.m.
SCAQMD 21865 E. Copley Drive - CC -2
MARTIN'S MARIONETTES- October 28, 1998 - 3:30 p.m.
Diamond Bar Community Library 1061 Grand Avenue
HALLOWEEN CARNIVAL- October 30, 1998 - 7:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m.
Diamond Bar/Walnut YMCA 22600 Sunset Crossing Road
ELECTION DAY- November 3, 1998 - 7:00 a.m. - 8:00 p.m.
Designated polling places within the community - City Clerk 909 860-2489
CITY COUNCII, MEETING- November 3, 1998 - 6:30 p.m.
SCAQMD 21865 E. Copley Drive - Auditorium
TOWN HALL MEETING- Saturday, November 7, 1998 - 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
SCAQMD 21865 E. Copley Drive - Auditorium - TOPIC: Traffic Solutions
PLANNING COMIVIISSION MEETING- November 10, 1998 - 7:00 p.m.
SCAQMD 21865 E. Copley Drive - Auditorium
12. ADJOURNMENT: November 10, 1998
c:\wp51\agcmda\pknningk10-27.99
2.
L�3
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ooil
nI
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION '`o
JOINT MEETING WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION
SEPTEMBER 15, 1998
CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Herrera called the meeting to order at 4:07
p.m. in the South Coast Air Quality Management District Room CC -8, 21865 E.
Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California.
CITY COUNCIL ROLL CALL: Council Members Huff and O'Connor and Mayor
Herrera. Council Member Ansari and Mayor Pro Tem Chang were absent.
PLANNING COMMISSION ROLL CALL: Commissioners Kuo and Nelson,
Vice Chairman Tye and Chairman McManus. Commissioner Ruzicka was absent.
Also present were: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager; Michael Jenkins, City
Attorney; James DeStefano, Deputy City Manager; David Liu, Deputy Public Works
Director; Bob Rose, Community Services Director; Mike Nelson, Communications
& Marketing Director; Linda Magnuson, Assistant Finance Director; Lynda Burgess,
City Clerk; Ann Lungu, Associate Planner; Kellee Fritzal, Assistant to the City
Manager; Anne Haraksin, Administrative Assistant.
Mayor Pro Tem Chang arrived at 4:12 p.m.
Proposed Discussion Items: ,
A. VISION FOR THE FUTURE AND REDEVELOPMENT
CM/Belanger pointed out,the Redevelopment Project Area using the map.
He stated that 4 programs were approved: Commercial Rehabilitation,
Business Assistance and Retention, Infrastructure and Parking Mitigation.
In response to C/Huff, Chair/McManus stated that the Planning Commission
was asking about the current status of the Redevelopment Agency and
whether the Agency ascertained a specific starting point and overall vision.
C/Huff explained that the Redevelopment Agency is driven by funding. In
the meantime, the Agency is proceeding with efforts that involve monies on
loan from the City that will be repaid. Depending on the outcome of the
pending lawsuit, the Agency will proceed to implement its goals. Conceptual
drawings were prepared for 5 commercial areas in order to give the Agency
tools to engage in discussions with the centers' owners and managers.
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA ACTIVITIES.
DCM/DeStefano stated that two conceptual drawings show possibilities for
rehabilitation and expansion at the Country Hills Towne Center and the
Kmart/Vons area. With respect to the Country Hills Towne Center, the
Agency is identifying ways to make the center more attractive to retail
SEPTEMBER 15, 1998 PAGE 2 COUNCIL/PLANNING COMM.
tenants and attempting to deal with the loss of the Ralphs Market. One of
the concepts shows ho,* the Ralphs facility could be increased in size to
about 45,000' from the current 25,000'. The plan has-been shared verbally
only with the property owner.
In response to Chair/McManus, DCM/DeStefano reported that Ralphs has
a time period that they can continue to maintain their lease and the store
before the property owner has an opportunity to buy it back. -
CM/Belanger stated that the store was vacated in May and that Ralphs has
120 days from vacation.
DCM/DeStefano further stated that the plan has been shared with the Vons
and Savon area property owners as well as the property owner of Ken's
Hardware. The plan shows how the retail businesses on Golden Springs
Rd. and D.B. Blvd. could be linked with Kmart and, through a streetscape
pattern, could be linked with Vons and Savon. The plan shows on the Vons
and Savon side, a potential expansion of Vons and some in-line stores
between Vons and Savon, upper deck parking above the Vons store. The
plan further shows an expansion of the Kmart Store on the northerly side
(garden center) with a potential for 2 additional pads on either side of
McDonalds. Moving south, there is proposed to be a direct connection
between Kmart and the Paretta property (East-West Bank/The Jolly Bagel,
etc.) The Kmart Center has about 5 different owners for McDonald's, the
utility company, Kmart, Ken's Hardware to the Video Box, and the gas
station. The East-West Bank center from D.B. Blvd. to Prospectors Rd. is
owned by 1 family trust.
In response to C/Nelson regarding Agency proceedings until the lawsuit is
resolved, C/Huff stated that the Agency has assumed a back -burner posture.
Some things can and have been done; however, the expensive items are on
hold.
CM/Belanger explained that the philosophy of the Redevelopment Agency
has been, from the very beginning, that in the early years of the private area,
increment would begin to grow; that the City would advance to the
Redevelopment Agency because it would need to engage in redevelopment
activities. This is a philosophy that the Agency continues to embrace with -
a caveat. There are certain areas that have been avoided because if the
Redevelopment Project Area were to go away, there is some question as to
whether or not the advance of monies to the Redevelopment Agency would
be considered "prudent." Whereas, an Agency can engage in a myriad of
activities in relationship to properties, cities generally cannot. Therefore, the
Agency has engaged in activities related to infrastructure. At worst, if the
infrastructure programs were dismantled as a result of the finding of non-
validity for the Project Area, the City encumbers itself for the design of those
SEPTEMBER 15, 1998 PAGE 3 COUNCIUPLANNING COMM.
projects. Four designs are currently underway: Brea Canyon Rd. from the
southerly City limits to Pathfinder Rd.; Golden Springs Rd. from Grand
Ave. to Torito Ln. Brea Canyon Rd. from Pathfinder to Golden Springs;
and Golden Springs to the westerly City limits. Approximately 15 traffic
signal projects are undergoing warrant review under the Redevelopment
Agency. One proposed redevelopment project is Gateway Center #2 (Ranch
Festival location). A request was entered for a commercial real estate
appraisal and retention of a real estate advisor. This proposal is for a major
fixed commercial tenant (Fortune 500) to come into the location on a 15 -year
lease basis. The project continues to move forward to the extent possible
in order to bring the project to the Planning Commission for development
review. This project is expected to return a net increment flow of $3,000,000
to the Redevelopment Agency over time. As a result of this project, there is
a possibility of a second equally recognizable tenant proposed to come in to
the same facility which will give a certain prestige to the Gateway Center.
This project would not have been possible without the Redevelopment
Agency.
CM/Belanger explained who the Redevelopment Agency staff members are
in response to Chair/McManus' request.
CM/Belanger responded to VC/Tye that recent cases have resulted in
decisions for and against the plaintiffs.
RECESS: 4:32 p.m.
RECONVENE: 4:47 p.m.
Council Member Ansari arrived at 4:47 p.m.
C. EXPECTATIONS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
C/Huff voiced his expectation that his Planning Commission appointee will
make independent decisions without input from him. Other Council Members
may have other expectations.
M/Herrera said that, like Council Member Huff, she expected that her
appointee would work independently to reach his/her own informed
conclusion.
C/O'Connor stated that although she would never tell her appointee how to
vote, she does keep in touch to see how things are developing. She has
contacted her appointee to determine the reason for his vote after the fact.
VC/Tye indicated that, during the time that he spent on the Parks &
Recreation Commission, his Council Member never told him how to vote.
SEPTEMBER 15, 1998 PAGE 4 COUNCIL/PLANNING COMM
C/Ansari stated that she has never told her appointee how to vote.
D. REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND IMPACT MITIGATION.
E. REGIONAL TRAFFIC IMPACTS AND SOLUTIONS
F. WILDLIFE CORRIDOR CONSERVATION AUTHORITY ACTIVITIES
UPDATE
C/Huff explained that the Four Corners Transportation Committee. is
currently involved in a study with the Orange County Transportation
Authority (OCTA). OCTA is acting as the lead agency. The committee is
studying the impact of traffic and projecting the growth of the dairy preserve
from the 15 fwy. to the east to SR57 on the west, SR60 on the north and the
91 fwy. on the south. Within that area, 3 alignments are being considered:
Bypass to SR57 via Tonner Canyon, Soquel Canyon and Carbon Canyon.
Subsequently, Soquel Canyon has been eliminated from the General Plan
for the 2 cities involved. A possible regional bypass road
has been narrowly defined in D.B.'s General Plan. WCCA is attempting to
purchase property from The Boy Scouts. D.B.'s position --is to include an
easement for a road within that sale. The study will determine whether a
regional Tonne, eanyon bypass road or some other regional solution is
feasible.
C/Nelson asked if the study focuses on how large the arterial should be and
where it should be located -as opposed to whether it is needed. He believed
the need is a foregone conclusion.
C/Huff stated that Chino Hills and D.B. recognize the need for a bypass
corridor. Chino Hills does not believe their traffic presents a problem to
D.B., they believe the traffic initiates further east and presents traffic
problems for both cities. Therefore, the committee felt it was necessary to
first quantify the problem.
C/Ansari stated that Gwenn Norton Perry suggested that the Four Corners
Committee be disbanded. She fought to get the money for the Four Corners
Committee study. Gwenn Norton Perry thought that the 71 fwy. solved the
problem.
M/Herrera said that Council is attempting to provide legitimacy to the
recommendations that emerge from the study, at which point agreements
can be formed because the alternative roadway will go through several cities
and counties. The question of alignment, width and funding sources will be
a consideration.
C/Huff indicated that consideration of the bypass roadway will include the
SEPTEMBER 15, 1998 PAGE 5 COUNCIUPLANNING COMM.
hours of operation.
In response to Chuff, CM/Belanger stated that the study is anticipated to be
completed by the end of 1999 and will encompass traffic volumes,
alternatives, cities' General Plans, landfills, easements, etc. Using the map,
he explained the options under consideration. He stated that M/Herrera
single-handedly, along with C/Huff, made certain that D.B. has a right to
consideration of an easement within the negotiations.
M/Herrera explained that negotiations between WCCA and the Boy Scouts
continue. Not only is there a difference in price, there are major differences,
ie: the Scouts wish to retain an area where they can maintain the Scout
Camp and no agreement has been reached with respect to this location nor
is there agreement between the Scouts and WCCA about the location of the
primary roadway leading to the Scout Camp and a secondary roadway
location. There has not been a Wildlife Corridor meeting since June.
VC/Tye asked what options are being considered to mitigate traffic on the
City's streets. He does not believe additional traffic signals are the answer.
CM/Belanger responded that traffic signals allow residents to gain access
to major boulevards.
In response to Chair/McManus, C/Huff indicated that the main concern for
mitigating regional traffic is finding a funding source. In the meantime,
measures can be taken to impede the flow of regional traffic while assisting
the residents.
C/Ansari asked about the status of the SR57/60 interchange study.
CM/Belanger responded that it is funded to include land acquisition and
CalTrans expects construction to begin in the.year 2001. As a result of the
City of Industry's eastern industrial complex, D.B. will receive $1.9 million in
mitigation measures based on their traffic impacts to Grand Ave. and D.B.
Blvd. and Grand Ave. and Golden Springs Rd. The City of Industry recently
sent out a notice of preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for two
about a100 -bay, tiltup buildings with 100 truck docks iI idustrial faeflity on
the south north side of Grand Ave. D.B. will work to get a MOU in terms of
potential traffic related to the inipacts f, on. that facilityies.
City (A ►ndustry is the owner of the Tres Hermanos Ranch, which is located
in D.B. and uhinc Hills . A proposed joint powers
agreement (Tres "-•*Hans Conservation Authority) could be a The dPA
is the vehicle for insuring "-"here is mitigation of the impacts to D.B. In
terms of traffic mitigation, the City is 1O"n0 global picture and the fact
that cities on the easterly and westen) *ha, e these 2 e borders that are
SEPTEMBER 15, 1998 PAGE 6 COUNCIUPLANNING COMM
creating traffic impacts to the City. Council continues to work to find
resources to mitigate tho%e impacts. In this regard, the City of Industry has
been very cooperative.
MPT/Chang did not believe that Council Members have the solution.
However, the Mayor has scheduled a study session on October 6 to begin
to study what can be done to resolve the City's traffic problems. He believed
the solution will come as a result of hiring a professional consultant to study
the potential long-term solutions. The study group will establish the goals
and objectives for the consultant.
CM/Belanger stated that recently, WCCA the eo, ise, vation Authority has
received funding from the State for purchase of a 31 acre site at Coal
Canyon and the 91 fwy. From WCCA's point of view, that is the key site for
maintenance of the wildlife corridor. He reiterated that the other aspect of
this corridor is the purchase of the Boy Scout Reservation which is proposed
to facilitate this particular corridor.
WCCA has access to $10,000,000 in Prop A (1996) funds which
Supe, visor K, rabe is holding safe. WCCA can use this money
for purchase of arra property east of Colima Rd. to Puente Hills, which
includes the Shell Oil property. Supervisor Knabe has asked that the
money not be released until the affected parties mutually agree on the
sale and other issues.
C/Nelson appreciated the Council's position in its participation with this
program. He did not understand the narrow focus on mountain lions and
why WCCA would wish to bring a 180 Ib. predator through neighborhoods.
He believed WCCA is an organization that serves the very narrow self-
interest of a relative few persons.
M/Herrera stated that she has pointed out C/Nelson's concerns to WCCA.
Since the inception of her participation in the organization, the group
focused on the corridor starting in Whittier and leading to the Cleveland
National Forest. Now the organization is veering to the left and attempting
to include Tonner Canyon for which they have no adequate explanation.
C/Nelson also did not understand the inclusion of Tonner Canyon.
G. PROPOSED TRES HERMANOS CONSERVATION AUTHORITY STATUS.
CM/Belanger stated that Council approved a draft Tres Hermanos
Conservation Authority JPA in concept but that the Chino Hills City Council
has not yet approved the JPA. The purpose of the two committees getting
together is to work out whatever language is deemed appropriate. In order
to move forward, it makes sense to have all three cities involved in the
SEPTE=MBER 15, 1998 PAGE 7 COUNCIL/PLANNING COMM.
process. However, D.B. and Chino Hills can move forward with the JPA to
jointly plan the area without the participation of the City of Industry.
r
C/Huff stated that it did not make sense to move forward without the
collaborative effort of the three involved cities.
H. LARKSTONE PARK LAND TRANSFER STATUS.
M/Herrera stated that the City has entered into discussions with the Walnut
Valley Unified School District about land they might contribute for Larkstone
Park. An agreement has been reached between the City and the School
District subcommittee that the land would be part of the South Point Canyon
bottom.
CM/Belanger indicated that the purpose of the park would be for an
interpretive area. In order for the area to be a more meaningful location, it
would probably require the School District to add some land to increase the
size beyond 3 acres. The proposed location is the canyon area immediately
south of Diamond Crest Rd.
M/Herrera indicated that the School District is meeting with their advisors
and consultants and measuring the canyon bottom. They will advise what
size area will be declared to be included in the park facility.
In response to C/Nelson, C/Huff explained that the Walnut School District is
concerned about making a good faith effort.
M/Herrera said that before she exits her office as Mayor, she is committed
to working out an agreement for Larkstone Park.
OTHER MATTERS OF MUTUAL INTEREST.
C/Huff spoke about the Arciero project and whether it is what the City
envisions. He encouraged Commissioners to look at the area and the mass
of the houses on the lots. He pointed out that the Snow Creek area of
Walnut is a beautiful area in that the houses have large lots. He believes
the City needs to be moving toward the inclusion of language in its
Development Code that encourages that type of development. He also
expressed concern with the mass of the structure being constructed within
The Country Estates on the border of Grand Ave. north of Shotgun Ln.
VC/Tye thanked Council for their diligence and vision for the City.
C/Ansari explained that all Council Members sit on regional committees that
address concerns that involve the City of D.B.
SEPTEMBER 15, 1998 PAGE 8 COUNCIL/PLANNING COMM.
C/Huff stated that D.B. has an excellent reputation for being involved in
regional issues.
M/Herrera thanked the Planning Commissioners for their participation.
4. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to conduct, Mayor
Herrera adjourned the Study Session to Closed Session at 5:36 p.m.. Chairman
McManus adjourned the Planning Commission meeting to September 22, 1998.
LYNDA BURGESS, City Clerk
ATTEST:
MAYOR
JAMES DeSTEFANO, Planning
Commission Secretary
ATTEST:
PLANNING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN
MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISS414P SEPTEMBER 22, 1998
CALL TO ORDER:
Vice Chairman Tye called the meeting to order at 7:11 p.m. in the South Coast Air Quality
Management Auditorium, 21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissioner Ruzicka.
ROLL, CALL:
Present: Vice Chairman Steve Tye, and Commissioners George Kuo, Steve Nelson and
Joe Ruzicka.
Chairman McManus was excused from the meeting.
Also Present: James DeStefano, Deputy City Manager and Ann Lungu, Associate Planner.
MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: None
APPROVAL OF AGENDA: As submitted.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
1. Minutes of September 8, 1998.
C/Nelson moved, C/Kuo seconded, to approve the minutes of September 8, 1998 as
presented. Motion carried with the following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Kuo, Nelson, VC/Tye
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Ruzicka
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Chair/McManus
OLD BUSINESS: None
NEW :BUSINESS:
Planning Commission Future Meeting Schedule.
DCM/DeStefano explained that scheduled meetings fall near holidays in November and
December. Several projects that require the Planning Commission's delibeiation are
SEPTEMBER 22, 1998 PAGE 2
scheduled for November. He asked that the Commission consider the possibility of
rescheduling the second November meeting.
Following discussion the Commission concurred to schedule the second November meeting
on its regular meeting date of Tuesday, November 24, 1998.
DCM/DeStefano suggested that the Planning Commission may wish to go dark for the second
meeting in December.
Following discussion, the Commission concurred to proceed with its regularly scheduled
meeting date of December 22, 1998 if calendar items are scheduled.
PUBLIC HEARING: None
PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS: None
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
DCM/DeStefano stated that staff has provided conceptual drawings of possible designs for the
Kmart/Vons Shopping area on Diamond Bar Boulevard as well as, the Country Hills Towne Center
in south Diamond Bar. This information is provided as a follow up to the Commission's request at
its joint meeting with the City Council. The information contained in the packet is information that
is being distributed to shopping centers, owners, developers and tenants in order to encourage their
participation in a revitalization program. The focus for the Kmart/Vons area is to identify the area
as a unique shopping district between Golden Springs Drive and the 60 freeway with streetscape
improvements. Another component of the design is to incorporate access from Golden Springs Drive
to the Kmart Shopping Center area which would relocate a portion of the building near The Jolly
Bagel Restaurant. The signalized intersection which connects Kmart and Vons would be enhanced
with free-standing signage. He pointed out that the drawings incorporate expansion opportunities:
A 20,000-30,000 square foot addition on the north side of the Kmart store and two freestanding
restaurant/retail pads that could occur on either side of the McDonald's Restaurant. Additionally, the
concept incorporates a feature to close the gap between Vons and Savon with retail stores with a
pedestrian friendly atmosphere. This design anticipates a rooftop parking area for the Vons
employees.
C/Ruzicka asked if there is a way of linking pedestrian traffic between the Vons Shopping Center and
the Kmart Shopping Center.
DCM/DeStefano responded that the major anchors have the ability to block stores from being located
adjacent to Diamond Bar Boulevard. If retail stores could be located near Diamond Bar Boulevard,
the opportunity for linking the pedestrian traffic would be enhanced.
VC/Tye said he has observed very few people walking from Vons to Savon and even fewer people
walking from the Vons Shopping Center to the Kmart Shopping Center.
SEPTEMBER 22, 1998 PAGE 3
C/Ruzicka stated that there are four shopping centers in the area and he would like to see an
opportunity for linkage of the centers.
DCM/DeStefano concurred with C/Ruzicka that this area like the vast majority of Diamond Bar was
not master planned. There is no pedestrian linkage between commercial sites and none were
contemplated. In addition, there is no vehicular linkages between the majority of commercial sites
in the City.
C/Ruzicka stated he believes it is important for the Redevelopment Agency to remind the citizens that
when they review plans for the area the City is working with an almost impossible situation.
DCM/DeStefano stated that the area is a very tough retrofit absent complete redevelopment which
is not likely to occur in the present marketplace. This area is a very difficult challenge for the
designers. He spoke about the various elevations within the area of the four shopping centers.
C/Ruzicka said he received a suggestion to incorporate small pocket -park types of areas within the
shopping area.
DCM/DeStefano responded to C/Ruzicka that the schematic is a result of collaboration between staff
and the design consultant.
DCM/DeStefano stated that the Country Hills Towne Center schematic involves a replacement for
the Ralphs space with an equivalent tenant and increase in the space. This design scheme employs
a more dramatic entry, more landscaping, and more pedestrian delineation within the center. Two
additional construction areas are included: The pad behind Dr. Cho's building and the pad immediately
east of the theater building. The design also incorporates more outdoor seating and dining
opportunities along the row of stores that currently exist.
C/Ruzicka indicated he spoke with a tenant at the Country Hills Towne Center who expressed
concern about the safety of Diamond Bar Boulevard ingress/egress. The tenant stated he has
observed many motorists driving in the wrong set of lanes.
DCM/DeStefano responded that this plan incorporates a reduction of the main driveway which will
create an opportunity for additional parking and address some of the safety concerns.
C/Ruzicka asked if the tenants will be notified about the proposed plans.
DCM/DeStefano indicated that the City has been working with the property owner and their
management company for some time to revitalize this center. The primary concern is to fill the
Ralphs space. The tenants are concerns about the loss of the major tenant. The tenants have not
been directly told about the.City's effort to pursue the concept and marketing plan which is relatively
new. At this time, this is a concept to stimulate interest.
VC/Tye asked if any thought has been given to relocating the theater to the opposite end of the
shopping center and incorporating a stadium style facility.
SEPTEMBER 22, 1998 PAGE 4
DCM/DeStefano responded that to his knowledge, no such discussion has taken place. He explained
how the City is actively working to attract businesses to areas of the City that fit into the
demographics of the community.
DCM/DeStefano responded to VC/Tye that Ralphs holds the lease on the property in the Country
Hills Towne Center for several years hence. The property owner has the opportunity to buy back the
lease. Ralphs general interest is to discourage grocery stores at that location. The City's goal is to
put a grocery store of regional or national quality in that location. The property owner has contacted
several major markets about locating to the area.
Responding to VC/Tye, DCM/DeStefano stated that a Redevelopment Agency hearing was held on
Friday. The judge took the information under submission and indications are that a decision will not
be rendered for at least two weeks and possibly as long as four weeks.
SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS as listed in the agenda.
DCM/DeStefano commented that upon conclusion of the Telecommunications Task Force meetings,
the Draft Ordinance will be forwarded to the Planning Commission for review in December or
January.
ADJOURNMENT:
C/Ruzicka moved, C/Kuo seconded, to adjourn the meeting. There being no further business to come
before the Planning Commission, Vice Chairman Tye adjourned the meeting at 8:02 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
James DeStefano
Secretary to the Planning Commission
Attest:
Steven Tye
Vice Chairman
CAWPS 14ninutes\pc\PCSEP22.MIN
DRk`T
MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OCTOBER 13, 1998
CALL. TO ORDER:
Chairman McManus called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in the South Coast Air Quality
Management Hearing Board Room, 21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissioner Ruzicka.
ROLI. CALL:
Present: Chairman Joe McManus, Vice Chairman Steve Tye, and Commissioners
George Kuo, Steve Nelson and Joe Ruzicka.
Also Present: James DeStefano, Deputy City Manager, Ann Lungu, Associate Planner and
Rob Searcy, Consultant Planner.
MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: None
APPROVAL OF AGENDA: As submitted.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
1. Minutes of September 22, 1998. ' Continued to October 27, 1998.
OLD BUSINESS: None
NEW BUSINESS:
PUBLIC HEARING:
1. Conditional Use Permit No. 98-6 and Development Review No. 98-9 (pursuant to Code
Sections 22.56.110, 22.28. 110 and 22.72.020) is a request to add approximately. 1,147 square
feet to an existing 5,181 square foot vacant bank building with a 2,119 square foot cellar for
a total of approximately 8,447 square feet to be utilized as a car wash with two oil and lube
bays and merchandise/boutique sales area. The project site is located within the C-1 zone.
The request includes a Planning Commission interpretation that the proposed use is consistent
with other uses permitted within the C-1 zone.
PROJECT ADDRESS: 2845 Diamond Bar Boulevard
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
OCTOBER 13, 1998 PAGE 2
PROPERTY OWNERS: David Zemer
954 Schumacher
Los Angeles, CA 90048
APPLICANT: Lance Templeton
2899 Monte Verde Drive
Covina, CA 91724
AstP/Lungu presented staffs report. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
approve Conditional Use Permit No. 98-6 and Development Review No. 98-9, Findings of
Fact and conditions as listed within the resolution.
Guy Williams, Land Use Planning Consultant, 978 Amelia, San Dimas, California, stated he
represents the property owner and applicant. Mr. Templeton and his family as well as the
architect are in attendance at tonight's meeting. The applicant and all concerned parties have
reviewed staffs report and concur with the conditions of approval. He asked that the
Planning Commission give consideration to Condition 5.(x) to allow the applicant the
opportunity to work with staff to determine the legal non -conforming status of the free
standing sign. He further stated that during the past year while working on the project the
applicant determined that there is considerable support for the Diamond Bar Car Wash in this
community. Endorsements have been obtained from M&H Realty Partners, the owner of the
Country Hills Towne Center as well as, from each of the tenants within the center. A petition
requesting that the Planning Commission approve the car wash with over 400 signatures of
Diamond Bar residents, many of which reside adjacent to or near the site, is hereby submitted
to the Commission. Mr. Templeton is a resident of Diamond Bar and resides just north of the
property. He and the owner respectfully request the Commission's approval.
C/Nelson asked how the proposed project compares with the Brea Auto Spa in its physical
appearance and operation.
Lance Templeton, applicant, stated the proposed operation will be very similar in operation
to the Brea Auto Spa. The architectural style is somewhat different yet similar in overall
quality. Operating hours are similar to those of the Brea Auto Spa.
Mr. Templeton responded to C/Nelson that the wash area will be adjacent to the center on
the back side of the property.
C/Nelson expressed concern about the noise generated in the residential area immediately
across Diamond Bar Boulevard from the proposed location.
Mr. Templeton indicated to C/Nelson that the petition for approval includes signatures of a
number of people who live in the area. He stated that he has not discussed the issue with the
homeowners association. However, there has been no stated opposition to the project. He
indicated that he concurs with the requested color changes. He further stated that a portion
of the Bank of America structure will be retrofitted. However, it is a steel structure with
girders expanding the entire building. There are no bearing walls in the building.
OCTOBER 13, 1998 PAGE 3
AstP/Lungu responded to.VC/Tye that notification of property owners is based upon a 500
foot radius from the boundaries of the project site.
DCM/DeStefano indicated that renters of the condominium units are not generally aware of
activities taking place because the notice goes to the property owners. 140 property owners
were notified as a result of the mailed notice for this project. Based upon 140 property
owners, a significant number of those condominiums across Diamond Bar Boulevard were
notified as a part of this process.
Mr. Williams indicated to Chair/McManus that he prepared the 500 foot radius map and he
specifically notified all of the condominium owners even though it may have been beyond the
500 foot radius. Approximately 80 percent of the notifications went to property owners who
reside in the complex.
Chair/McManus opened the Public Hearing.
Charles German, 22848 Hilton Head Drive, expressed his support for the proposed project.
Chair/McManus closed the Public Hearing.
C/Ruzicka asked how future redevelopment plans may be effected by this project.
DCM/DeStefano stated that the Redevelopment Agency and its staff are involved in a
marketing effort to revitalize the Country Hills Towne Center and to expand its usage and fill
vacant spaces that exist within the center. He further stated he considers the project property
to be an isolated piece of property from the balance of the shopping center and envisions the
project positively impacting the shopping center.
C/Ruzicka asked how Diamond Bar Boulevard vehicular traffic will be effected by this project
and whether the City will allow street parking.
DCM/DeStefano responded that parking is prohibited on Diamond Bar Boulevard with the
exception of specifically designated church parking which is permitted on special occasions.
Staff does not intend to recommend on -street parking for any portion of Diamond Bar
Boulevard with the exception of the aforementioned. As staffs report indicates, traffic
emanating from this project will actually be less than what was anticipated from the prior
Bank of America use.
Responding to C/Ruzicka, DCM/DeStefano stated that from staffs prospective, abandonment
indicates that the bank has been vacant and not utilized for a significant period of time.
Mr. Templeton indicated to C/Ruzicka that the project's design contemplates a single purpose
entry/exit.
AstP/Lungu responded to C/Kuo the noise study was conducted on the blower. The
emanation will not exceed the City's standard in accordance with the resolution's condition
OCTOBER 13, 1998
PAGE 4
of approval. Approximately 17 percent of the water utilized in the car wash process will enter
the sewer system after it is clarified by the on-site system before it enters the sewer system.
The water quality is monitored by the County of Los Angeles through the NPDES permit
process.
DCM/DeStefano explained to C/Ruzicka that this project is not a fully automated car wash.
It is a hand car wash with some automated equipment such as a dryer blower. Employees will
wash the vehicles. No brushes or other mechanical devices that are used at fully automated
car washes will be utilized at this location.
Mr. Templeton explained to C/Ruzicka that this project proposes no brushes in the wash
tunnel. This project will have personnel on site who wash and dry the vehicle which affords
a more quality wash. This is a full service operation with vacuuming, interior cleaning and
exterior wash.
Mr. Templeton confirmed to VC/Tye that the proposed project is much more comparable to
the Brea Auto Spa than the facility at Nogales adjacent to the 60 freeway.
Responding to C/Kuo's concern regarding noise, Mr. Templeton stated that the building
contains a 2119 square foot cellar where the noise generating equipment will be located. As
a result, there will be no exterior noise generated by those items.
DCM/DeStefano explained that staffs concern regarding the sign is the lapse of time between
when the bank ceased its operation and when this application will take effect at that location.
The applicant has suggested that the condition be either removed or reworded. Staff concurs
with the applicant's request to reword Condition 5.(x) to allow the applicant the opportunity
to work with staff to resolve the matter. This is a discretionary permit and the Commission
may elect to have the sign brought down to a six foot height.
C/Nelson moved, C/Ruzicka seconded, to approve Conditional Use Permit No. 98-6 and
Development Review No. 98-9, Findings of Fact and conditions as listed within the resolution
with the provision that the current signage be brought down to a six foot sign. Motion
carried by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Kuo, Nelson, Ruzicka, VC/Tye,
Chair/McManus
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None
2. Conditional Use Permit No. 98-8 and Development Review No. 98-10 (pursuant to Code
Sections 22.72.020, and 22.28.260) is a request to construct two, three story professional
buildings totaling approximately 165,888 square feet on Lot 2. The project site is located
within the Gateway Corporate Center.
PROJECT ADDRESS: Lots 2 and 5
Gateway Corporate Center Drive
OCTOBER 13, 1998 PAGE 5
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
PROPERTY OWNER/ Trammel Crow, acting as agent for A.E.W. Diamond
Bar
APPLICANT: Business Associates
601 S. Figueroa Street
Los Angeles, CA 90017
CP/Searcy presented staffs report. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve
Conditional Use Permit No. 98-08 and Development Review No. 98-10, Findings of Fact and
conditions as listed within the resolution.
CP/Searcy responded to C/Ruzicka that he intended to say that the project may not happen
all at one time.
CP/Searcy indicated to VC/Tye that Condition (aa) on Page 7 of the Resolution means that
the initial exercising of the grant must take place within two years from date of approval. If
the applicant proposes to build one building in year one and the second building in year four,
the City would then devise a plan for them to develop this lot to the extent that it feels must
implemented during phase I and bring in secondary conditions that would extend toward the
control of phase II. He said he would not anticipate a different project if it was developed
over a four or five year period.
CP/Searcy concurred with VC/Tye to correct the first line of Condition (t) on Page 7 to
indicate a commercial structure instead of a single family structure.
C/Nelson asked for explanation of the traffic mitigation measures as specifically related to the
intersection of Golden Springs Drive and Grand Avenue.
CP/Searcy responded that historically, because of the development of the Gateway Corporate
Center complex, mitigation measures were implemented at Grand Avenue and Golden Springs
Drive. The intersection was widened to accommodate the carrying capacity. Funds were set
aside by the applicant for the phased signalization of the intersection although it was not a
requirement set forth by the City. Additionally, second left turn pockets were installed on
Grand Avenue for turns onto Golden Springs Drive and a right turn lane was installed on
eastbound Golden Springs Drive for turn onto southbound Grand Avenue. As a part of this
project, traffic impacts have not been identified because the City needs to determine whether
it is in the original threshold that was identified upon original project approval. Stag' does not
anticipate a significant off-site impact.
In response to Chair/McManus, CP/Searcy stated that the trash enclosure required by the
Gateway Corporate Center Association is usually a block wall approximately 12 to 15 feet
in height with a trellis structure over the top. He pointed out the possible location for
installation of a traffic control device at Valley Vista adjacent to the site which would alert
motorists to slow down.
OCTOBER 13, 1998
PAGE 6
CP/Searcy explained to C/Ruzicka that the applicant is required to conform to all South Coast
Air Quality Management guidelines in conjunction with project grading.
David Nazarra, Vice President of Development Services for Tooley Co. stated that Trammel
Crow Company is very pleased to have the opportunity to develop in Diamond Bar. He
indicated that his firm has worked extensively with staff on the site plan and the aesthetic
appeal of the building. He said that his company considered themselves as citizens once the
site was purchased and have functioned as such, especially since this project will be located
across from City Hall. He thanked staff He stated that in working with them, he found staff
to be very knowledgeable, very professional and very competent.
Mr. Nazarra responded to C/Nelson that his firm has a strong prospect lined up for a large
portion of one of the buildings and another project for almost the entirety of the second
building.
Responding to VC/Tye, Mr. Nazarra stated that once escrow closes, it is his firm's intent to
build both buildings and complete construction in one phase.
Chair/McManus opened the Public Hearing
There being no one present who wished to speak on this matter, Chair/McManus closed the
Public Hearing.
C/Nelson said he feels the proposed project was very well thought out. He agreed that Mr.
Searcy's presentation was excellent.
C/Ruzicka moved, C/Kuo seconded, to approve Conditional Use Permit No. 98-8 and
Development Review No. 98-10. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Kuo, Nelson, Ruzicka, VC/Tye,
Chair/McManus
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None
3. Conditional Use Permit No. 98-9 and Development Review No. 98-11 (pursuant to Code
Section 22.72.010, 22.56.110 and 22.78.070G.) is a request to construct a 5,029 square foot,
one story addition to an existing 5,380 square foot commercial building within a retail
shopping center identified as Diamond Bar Town Center.
PROJECT ADDRESS: 1195 Diamond Bar Boulevard
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
PROPERTY OWNER/ Dariush and Jacob Khakshouri and Max Netty
APPLICANT: 10750 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1404
Los Angeles, CA 90024
OCTOBER 13, 1998 PAGE 7
AstP/Lungu presented staffs report.
AstP/Lungu confirmed to VC/Tye that no parking spaces will be lost as a result of the
increase in the area of the structure.
C/Ruzicka expressed concern about the parking availability in the project area.
DCM/DeStefano stated that this property was developed under the old Los Angeles County
Code standards which called for one parking space for every 400 square feet of gross floor
area. The standards under which the City of Diamond Bar currently operates are much more
stringent with one parking space for every 250 square feet of gross floor area.. This project
has the potential to extend the hours of the shopping center from approximately 8:00 a.m. to
6:00 p.m. to about 5:30 a.m. to almost midnight based upon the use. There is an opportunity
for the applicant to secure an agreement to share parking with its neighbors.
DCM/DeStefano indicated to VC/Tye that a shared parking agreement with Jack in the Box
Restaurant could provide the 12 parking spaces needed for compliance.
C/Nelson said he does not like to see vacant bank buildings and he believes the project is an
excellent opportunity to fill a vacancy. He said he is concerned about the parking. However,
if the applicant complies with staffs condition for a shared parking agreement, his concerns
are alleviated.
Mr. Jacob Khakshouri, spoke about the proposed project. He stated that it has been a
pleasure to work with the City's professional and courteous staff. He further stated he read
staffs report and concurs with the conditions of approval. He explained why the coffee house
is considered a retail establishment and not a restaurant and why the outside seating should
be considered to be a part of the landscape and not additional building area. Therefore, the
parking should be calculated based upon retail use and not upon restaurant use. He indicated
that he does not believe it will be possible to obtain a reciprocal agreement for shared parking
with his neighbor.
Mr.Khakshouri responded to C/Ruzicka that in the initial stages of discussion with staff, it
was thought that there were existing reciprocal agreements for shared parking. It was not
until recently that it came to light that no such agreements exist.
C/Ruzicka said he has visited several Starbucks coffee houses where business staff meetings
are being conducted and he indicated he views the situation differently from the applicant.
Mr. Khakshouri responded that he believes such meetings are infrequent and that the
applicant should not be penalized for providing additional seating area.
DCM/DeStefano stated that staff must consider parking based upon a worst case scenario.
Staff would assume the all seating will be utilized. One way to elevate the concern would be
to limit the number of outdoor seats available to the public.
OCTOBER 13, 1998 PAGE 8
C/Ruzicka stated he would like for the project to proceed by finding a resolution to the
parking situation.
Mr. Khakshouri stated he received his packet last evening and he has had no opportunity to
speak with his neighbor about the parking issue.
VC/Tye asked for clarification of the parking space requirement.
Chair/McManus opened the Public Hearing.
Chris Lewis, Pacific West Asset Management Corporation, stated his firm manages the
building referred to as Diamond Bar Town Center on behalf of Dr. Michael Drucker. The
property enjoys 18 tenants and two vacancies. If the project developer agreed to have no
outside seating they would be in compliance with the parking requirement within two parking
spaces which Dr. Drucker could agree to. He said that Starbucks is a restaurant. He said his
firm would be willing to enter into an agreement with the project applicant if there was no
outside seating included in the project proposal.
Chair/McManus closed the Public Hearing.
C/Nelson stated that he does not believe the parking should be restricted because each of the
tenants mentioned has the potential to generate traffic that will double park for a quick
transaction.
C/Ruzicka reiterated he likes the proposed project and he is concerned about the parking
issue. He asked if the applicant would consider redesigning Starbucks not to have outside
seating.
VC/Tye said he does not disagree about the parking issue but he does not understand the
conflict. He takes exception to the statement that Starbucks is a restaurant. He stated he
wants the project to go forward and wishes to find a compromise.
C/Ruzicka stated he believes people frequent Starbucks because of the name and not because
they provide or do not provide outside seating. He said he would presume that the least
possible resistance would be to relent the outside seating area so as to meet the center's need
for parking spaces.
AstP/Lungu offered that the inside seating and outside seating could be reduced to comply
with the parking requirements.
VC/Tye asked Mr. Lewis if the property owner would agree to the project if the outside
seating was limited.
Mr. Lewis responded that he would need to discuss the matter with Dr. Drucker.
VC/Tye asked if the loss of outside seating would preclude Starbucks from consideration.
OCTOBER 13, 1998
PAGE 9
Mr. Khakshouri stated that Starbucks has signed a Letter of Intent pending the final
determination by the Planning Commission. Starbucks previously indicated that they would
not be interested in pursuing the matter if outside seating is not provided. He offered to
negotiate further with Starbucks to reduce the outside seating.
Mr. Lewis said he is willing to negotiate with the applicant. However, he cannot speak for
Pic -N -Save, Jack in the Box or Firestone.
C/Ruzicka moved, C/Nelson seconded, to approve Conditional Use Permit No. 98-9 and
Development Review No. 98-11, Findings of Fact and conditions as listed within the
resolution. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES:
COMMISSIONERS
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS
ABSTAIN:
COMMISSIONERS
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS
Kuo, Nelson, Ruzicka, VC/Tye
None
Chair/McManus
None
PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS: VC/Tye stated that tonight the Commission has
heard high praise for staff from two different developers. The Commission has always felt that the
staff is very professional and thorough and it is good to hear this confirmed by the applicants. He
thanked. staff for their hard work.
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: None
ADJOURNMENT:
C/Nelson moved, C/Kuo seconded, to adjourn the meeting. There being no further business to come
before the Planning Commission, Chair/McManus adjourned the meeting at 10:04 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
James DeStefano
Secretary to the Planning Commission
Attest:
Joe McManus
Chairman
c:\wp51 a&,utes\pc\pcoct13.ndn
"I
I'lloo
I
I
. c
r 3
G)
pem
ti
.0
z
4
(A
m
m
(A
0
m
;o
m
z
-1
c
0
tv
tv
0 n
C
W
0 n
AC
qD %D
14
1:4
e.
f—
r,
t,
jr.
>
r"
r
0-4
xx.
ob
to
O.
0
m Co
o
z
C)
z
C)
V
"0
b
10
10
co
V
CA:::
A
ma
"I
I'lloo
I
I
. c
r 3
G)
pem
ti
.0
z
4
(A
m
m
(A
0
m
;o
m
z
-1