HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/9/19961
e�►i17:1
7:00 P.M.
South Coast Air Quality Management District
Auditorium
21865 East Copley Drive
Diamond Bar, California
Mike Goldenberg
•' Ruzicka
FrankEn Fong
•- McManus
Don b•r
Copies of staff reports or other written documentation relating to agenda items are on file in the Community
Development Office, located at 21660 E. Copley Drive, Suite 190, and are available for public inspection.
If you have questions regarding an agenda item, please call (909) 396-5676 during regular business hours.
In an effort to comply with the requirements of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the
City of Diamond Bar requires that any person in need of any type of special equipment, assistance or
accomodation(s) in order to communicate at a City public meeting must inform the Community
Development Department at (909) 396-5676 a minimum of 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting.
Please refrain from smoking, eating or drinking
in the Auditorium
The City of Diamond Bar uses recycled paper
and encourages you to do the same.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
Monday, September 9, 1996
Next Resolution No. 96-14
CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
1. ROLL CALL: COMMISSIONERS: Chairman Mike Goldenberg, Vice Chairman Joe
Ruzicka, Franklin Fong, Joe McManus and Don Schad
2. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS:
This is the time and place for the general public to address the members of the Planning Commission
on any item that is within their jurisdiction, allowing the public an opportunity to speak on non-public
hearing and non -agenda items. Please complete a Speaker's Card for the recording Secretary
(Completion of this form is voluntary). There is a five minute maximum time limit when addressing
the Planning Commission.
3. CONSENT CALENDAR:
The following items listed on the consent calendar are considered routine and are approved by
a single motion. Consent calendar items may be removed from the agenda by request of the
Commission only:
3.1 Minutes of August 26, 1996
4. OLD BUSINESS: None
5. NEW BUSINESS: None
6. ' PUBLIC HEARING:
6.1 Pursuant to Subdivision Code Section 21.16.020 Vested Tentative Tract 52203 is a
request to subdivide a. 6.3 gross acre site into 16 numbered lots for single family
residential development and 6 lettered lots for streets and landscaping. This proposal
is a further subdivision of Vested Tentative Tract 32400 lots.92 & 93, which is 93 lot
subdivision with 91 residential lots and 2 remainder lots which are part of the South
Pointe Master Plan, located on the west of Brea Canyon Road north of Pathfinder Road.
Applicant: Diamond Crest Estates, LLC, 27285 Las Rambles, Suite 230,
Mission Viejo, CA 92691
Property Owners: City of Diamond Bar, 21660 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar CA
91765, Arciero and Sons 950 North Tustin, Anaheim, CA 92807
Environmental Determination: On June 3, 1994, the City Council certified the Final
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the South Pointe Master Plan (State
Clearinghouse #92081040) which includes the subject property. Pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Sec. 15164, it has been determined that
potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed project will not require
major revisions to the EIR in that no significant changes in circumstances under which
1
the project is undertaken have occurred and no new information or issues of substantial
importance not previously addressed in the Final EIR have been identified through the
subsequent environmental review and therefore an addendum to the Final EIR has been
prepared.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the
attached resolution recommending City Council approval of Vesting Tentative Tract
Map. No. 52203, subject to the Findings of Fact and conditions listed.
7. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS:
8. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
9. ADJOURNMENT: September 23, 1996
2
MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
AUGUST 26, 1996
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairman Goldenberg called the meeting to order at 7:15 p.m. at the
South Coast Air Quality Management Auditorium, 21865 East Copley
Drive, Diamond Bar, California.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Commissioner
McManus.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Chairman Goldenberg, Vice Chairman Ruzicka,
Commissioners McManus and Schad.
Absent: commissioner Fong.
Also Present: Acting Community Development Director
Catherine Johnson, Assistant Planner Ann
Lungu, City Attorney William Rudell, and
Recording Secretary Carol -Dennis.
DEVELOPMENT CODE PUBLIC WORKSHOP - a workshop for community
residents and business owners to help identify issues related to
how the City regulates/oversees future development in concert with
the recently adopted General Plan. This is the first in a series
of public workshops being held to receive citizen's ideas about how
to better serve the public's interests in matters of property
development. Future workshops will be announced.
Chair/ Goldenberg stated that one of the Planning Commission's major'
goals is to present to the City of Diamond Bar a Development Code
that will provide an incentive to residents, businesses and
developers, to fully utilize the guidelines of the Code. The
finished product will help enhance property values, encourage
business development, and allow property development to remain
within the guidelines of the existing General Plan.
SP /Johnson
/Johnson stated the City of Diamond Bar is currently operating
under the Los Angeles County code which was adopted upon
incorporation- Since adoption, the City has expanded and modified
the code to reflect local issues and the mandates of State
legislation. Until recently the city operated without an adopted
General Plan. As a result, development has not been guided by
policies that are reflective of a General Plan which defines the
needs of the community. The City adopted its General Plan in July,
1995. TheGeneral Plan establishes strategies for implementing the
City's vision for its future. This vision includes the retention
of its hillside community character, the preservation of open
space, reduction of regional traffic impacts on local streets . , the
August 26, 1996 Page 2 Planning Commission
promotion of viable commercial activity, and the provision of well
maintained and attractive housing. The overriding goal of the
General Plant ref lected in the Vision Statement, --is the creation of
a community environment which nurtures social, cultural, religious,
educational and recreational opportunities for its citizens. one
of the major implementation tools of the General Plan is the
Development ' Code. The Development Code achieves this
implementation in a number of ways. For example, the City's
General Plan identifie's the retention of hillside community
character as one of its primary goals and further includes a
strategy requiring creation of a Slope Density Ordinance limiting
the number of dwelling units within hillside areas. The slope
density formula and its related standards will be included as part
of the new Development Code. Another goal is the promotion of
viable commercial activity. The existing commercial zoning
categories will be reviewed and, if necessary, be renamed and
consolidated to accommodate the commercial needs of the City. The
Development Code will include updated list of permitted uses to
reflect changes in technology and lifestyles, such as regulations
addressing telecommunications facilities, automated car washes, and
more specific standards for uses such as fast food restaurants and
daycare centers. The Development Code will .includes approval
processes for commercial, industrial and residential uses. one of•
the City's goals is to streamline and simplify these processes and
provide .clearer and more specific standards for development. Staff
believes simplifying the process will encourage businesses to
locate in the City. The new comprehensive Development Code is
envisioned to be a single development services related document
integrating the applicable portions of the existing code and
recently adopted ordinances into a single development services
volume which includes zoning and subdivision regulations,
development standards, and design guidelines..
SP/Johnson continued stating tonight's workshop is to kickoff a
series of meetings and workshops toward formulating a Development
Code. She introduced representatives from the three participating
consulting groups: Urban Design Studio, Jacobson & Wack, and
Crawford Multari & Starr.
Ron, Pf lugrath, Urban Design Studio indicated tonight's presentation
focuses on three major areas: 1) An opportunity for the Planning
Commission and the public to meet the consulting groups; provide a
Scope of Work schedule and how the community can be involved; and
for the consultants to receive input from the Planning Commission
and the public.
Bruce Jacobson, Jacobson & Wack, stated a Development Code
comprises the current Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance,
references the State's Subdivision Map Act, and references any
design guidelines that have been adopted as part of the City's
current Zoning Ordinance. 'The Development Code may also contain
unique needs and considerations for special areas of the City, such
as hillsides. The Development Code allows for the compilation of
August 26, 1996 Page 3 Planning Commission
all of the individual documents currently referenced by the city.
Beyond incorporating all of the documents into one "binder", the
Development Code must be -internally consistent. The design
guidelines incorporated in the Development Code will be prepared by
the City staff. The consultants will properly locate and integrate
the design guidelines within the Development Code. The Development
Code user will refer to the City's General Plan as. a separate
document. The challenge is to be certain that the Development Code
is consistent with the General Plan. As a result, the Development
Code will likely include purpose statements for each of the land
uses designated in the General Plan. The policies and goals
established in the General Plan will be considered within the
Development Code. The Development code will address the City's
special areas of concern such as hillside development, noise,
grading, certain types of housing, etc. Emphasis will be placed on
streamlining the building permit process. Mr. Jacobson stated the
true test of a Development Code is whether the document is user
friendly. He further stated that as consultants they can n provi e
the City with a completed Development Code that will provide
relative ease -of use in locating items and a clear understanding of
what the items require of the property owner/ applicant, as well as
what is expected of staff to meet the needs of the property owner.
Mr., Pf lugrath outlined the four components of the Development Code
preparation:
1) Need Identification and Document Review
1.1 Startup meetings
1.2 Document review
1.3 Staff workshops
1.4 Public outreach
1.5 Planning commission workshop
1.6 Phase 1 report
1.7 Draft format and outline of code
2) Administrative draft Development Code
2.1 Zoning district provisions
2.2 Administrative provisions
2.3 Development standards (general and specific)
2.4 Subdivision regulations
2.5 Design guidelines (prepared by staff)
2.6 Complete administrative draft
3) Public Review Draft and Final Draft Code
3.1 Public review draft
3.2 Planning Commission workshop revisions; public
review draft
3.3 Planning Commission and City Council public
hearings
3.4 Final Development Code
August 26, 1996 Page 4 Planning commission
4) Electronic Code hypertext version ULI
Mr. Pflugrath stated that a submittal generally takes about one
month of preparation and one month of staff review. once the draft
is completed, public and Planning Commission review commences.
Four Planning Commission workshops and seven public workshop
sessions scheduled. At the end'of the workshop schedule, a third
public draft is prepared for approximately two Planning Commission
Public Hearing meetings and three City Council Public Hearing
meetings to complete the process. * Upon completion of the Public
Hearing process, a final draft Development Code is prepared. In
addition, a hypertext interactive version will be completed for use
on the Internet.
Mr. Pflugrath stated that to properly complete the Public Hearing
process, he anticipates the preparation of the City's Development
Code will take approximately 18 months. He emphasized that the
process is not a rethinking or a restructuring of the City's
General Plan. The General Plan is used as a tool of direction for
the City's Development Code.
Paul Crawford, Crawford Multari & Starr, reiterated that the
Development Code is the City's primary tool for implementing the
General Plan. Whereas -the General Plan is a broad brush
description of what the community wants to become, the Development
Code provides the details for development decisions, development
project designs and land use establishment and operation. The
consultant's objective is to create a document that is "user
friendly". He presented a preliminary outline which reflects a six
part Development Code. The concept is to the code should be
organized so that the information most frequently utilized is at
the beginning, organized into tables, concise in language, and
profusely illustrated. Using this concept, the code begins with a
a six or seven page article explaining how the code works, what it
applies to and what kinds of activities might be exempt from its
provisions.' The second article discusses the material the public
is typically most interested in - the zoning districts and the uses
of land allowed within the zoning districts ("what can I do with my
land and what permit is required?) reflecting the land use
categories that the General Plan establishes. This article would
be expanded to provide regulations and standards for implementing
the General Plan categories. Included within this article are
Residential Districts, Commercial/Industrial Districts, Special
Purpose Districts and Combining and Overlay Zoning Districts. He
proposed the Land Use categories would appear down the left side of
a matrix with the Zoning Districts listed across the top of the
matrix. The Zoning Districts and Allowable Land Uses chapter would
also contain standards for development.relevaht to the particular
Zoning District. He presented a sample matrix for public viewing.
Article III, Site Planning and General Development Standards, -
discusses standards that do not apply to any particular zone, but
may apply to development in any zoning district. Article III
August 26, 1996 Page 5 Planning Commission
19 A
expands to talk about information regarding Fences, Hedges hdT
Walls; Height Limitations and Exceptions; Hillside Development
Standards; Home occupation Standards; Landscaping and Irrigation
Standards; Nonconforming Uses, Structures and Parcels; Off -Street
Parking and Loading Standards; Solid Waste/ Recyclable Materials
Storage; Telecommunications Facilities (i.e. antennae); Tree
Preservation, and Standards for Specific Uses (service station, car
wash) . Provisions contained in the back of the Code are provisions
related to procedural aspects of the Development Code
administration. He indicated that "Subdivision Regulations"
Article should be added to the outline between Article III and Part
IV as shown on the preliminary outline. The administrative
provisions talk about how development permit applications are
prepared, filed and processed. It contains criteria for approval
.or denial, authority for imposing conditions of approval, and
identifies requirements for scheduling Public Hearing Notices and
concludes by discussing provisions enforcement of the Development
Code. The final.part of the book would contain definitions or a
glossary of the terms used in the Development Code. Mr. Crawford
stated the Development Code will appear to look like a reference
work with the glossary and index at the back of the book in order
that people can locate relative information in a variety -of ways.
C/McManus asked if, as a business owner,. he could go to City Hall
and access information on the City's computer informing him what
documents need to be completed. and the process for obtaining a
per mit.
Mr. Crawford responded to C/McManus that the approach to the
Development Code is to provide the document in two forms: 1) a
printed hard copy for purchase or review, and 2) an electronic
version that will link to the City's web page and allow anyone to
access the document from any location including a public access
terminal in the City's Community Development Department and/or
branch libraries.
C/McManus asked if the Development Code will attempt to eliminate
duplication of documentation.
Mr. Crawford responded to C/McManus that the Development Code
should eliminate internal conflicts between provisions.
C/McManus asked if the electronic system would allow him to
generate a list of all documents required to accomplish a specific
task.
Mr. Crawford responded to C/McManus that the electronic version of
the Development Code will be designed to accept key word commands
to search the document.
C/Schad asked if the proposed schedule for compiling the
Development Code is flexible.
August 26,, 1996 Page 6 Planning Commission
Mr. Crawford responded to C/Schad that the schedule is designed to
accommodate maximum public participation and is intended to be
realistic.
C/Schad asked what would occur if in the process of clarifying the
Development Code the consultants found what they felt to be flaws
within the General Plan.
Mr. Crawford responded to C/Pchad that the consultant's role will
be to bring to the 'attention of staff any issues that are
identified. He reiterated that the consultants , have written a
number of Development Codes and Zoning ordinances immediately
following the adoption of City's General Plans. Often
implementation of a General Plan provision may turn out to be
problematic. He indicated they would present alternatives to staff
and suggest that a discussion of the matter take place before the
Planning Commission and City council. -
Chair/Goldenberg stated to Mr. Pflugrath that the Planning
Commission would like to present the final document to the City
Council by December, 1997. He asked Mr. Pflugrath to explain Item
1.4, Public outreach, under 1. Needs Identification and Document
Review of the Proposed Work Program. J
Mr. Pflugrath responded to Chair/Goldenberg that the public
outreach program is a series of events including tonight's
workshop, the survey which was compiled and distributed, newspaper
articles and announcements, and meetings with special interest
groups.
Mr. Pflugrath responded to Chair/Goldenberg that in his opinion,
the document can be completed in 16 months. What drives the
overall schedule is the amount of time staff is allowed to assist
with review of the administrative sections. A great deal of
staff's time is needed to complete the review process. Public
workshops will require the Planning Commission's time and
dedication. Saturday morning workshops are usually the most
effective use of time.
Chair/Goldenberg stated the Planning Commission will look to the
consultants to maintain a pace for presenting the document to City
Council by December, 1997.
VC/Ruzicka asked how long it took to prepare the Development Code
for mission Viejo.
Mr. Jacobson responded that the draft Development Code was complete
in less than two years. He stated that the document was completed
several years ago and the review process came to stalemate at the
Planning Commission level. Although portions of the document have
been reviewed and approved by the City Council, the entire document
has not yet been approved by the Council.
August 26, 1996 Page 7 Planning Commission
Mr. Pflugrath stated Mission Viejo elected not to review the
document in a public forum. When the document got to the Planning
Commission, the public had a lot of questions. The original
proposal included a series of workshops.
Mr. Pflugrath concurred with VC/Ruzicka that experience has taught
him that certain criteria including public input needs to be`
incorporated in the process to bring the document to final approval
in a timely manner.
Chair/Goldenberg asked for public comment.
Craig Clute, 21217 Fountain Springs Road, asked if the Development
Code will apply to existing developments and/or redevelopments.,
Mr. Crawford responded to Mr. Clute that because the document will
include development standards covering all aspects of development
in the community rules applying to new developments may differ from
rules applied to existing development. The long term effect will
be determined by the non --:conforming provisions of the Development
Code. Although it is yet to be determined what the differences may
be, it is probable that differences will exist. Items will be
highlighted in the proposed Development Code which differ from the
existing standards.
Chair/Goldenberg responded to Mr. Clute that for all intents and
purposes the current in-place residential will not change. A small
portion of a few commercial properties may change for clarification
and not for rezoning..
C/McManus responded to. Mr. Clute that if his concern is that
according to the new Development Code an existing property becomes
non -conforming it would be grandfathered in until such time as the
property changed ownership, such an occurrence is a possibility.,
The Planning Commission and City Council will ultimately determine
whether the code will be applied in this respect.
C/McManus responded to Mr. Clute that the review process will
determine whether or not, if the new Development Code renders an
existing property - non -conforming, it could be grandfathered in
until such time as the property changed ownership.
There being no one else who wished to speak,Chair/ Goldenberg
closed the public testimony portion of the workshop.
Mr. Pflugrath referred the Planning commission to Item 6. Topics
for Discussion. The Development Code seeks a slope density formula
to apply to hillside development and protect the hilly areas, the
canyons and the ridgelines, etc.
C/McManus asked what options in addition to the public meetings are
available for public input.
August 26, 1996 Page 8 Planning Commission
Dj
?Ar
Mr. Pflugrath responded to C/McManus that the Planning Commission
workshops are designed to handle most of the public input prior to
public hearings.
With respect to tree preservation, Mr. Pflugrath stated the goal is
to write an ordinance which preserves indigenous trees. In the
event a tree cannot be preserved, appropriate mitigation measures
will be included.
Mr. Pflugrath indicated the existing zoning ordinance does not
speak to density ranges. The City's General Plan is based on a
range and the Zoning Ordinance should also be based on a density
range.
Regarding parking and access, Mr. Pflugrath indicated the
identified items are incentives .for shared parking and shared
access. In addition, the code will identify parking standards
how much parking is required -for what types of uses.
Mr. Pflugrath stated the issue identified with respect to signs is
the fact that in some cases a'low six-foot high monument sign may
not be adequate for larger projects. All signage aspects for every
kind of development throughout the City will be researched. This
will include a proposal to provide incentives to insure higher
quality signs.
Mr. Pflugrath indicated the issue of fast growing home-based
businesses will be discussed. The Planning Commission will be
asked to determine the allowable threshold of these types of
business.
The development review and approval process will be discussed. As
a result, current processes may be changed or reassigned.
C/McManus asked about the inclusion of "reasonable" action.
Mr. Pflugrath responded to-C/McManus that certain aspects of the
code may include flexible language such as "subject to the approval -
of the Community Development Director".
The City does not currently have a Certificate of occupancy and a
Business License process. The code should allow the City to assist
businesses with successful openings rather than having a code
Enforcement officer advise them after the fact that it is not in
compliance.
Currently the City notices property owners within 300 feet and 500
feet radius of a proposed project for the public hearing process.
In some instances and due to the City's terrain, 300 or 500 feet is
insufficient. Other alternatives such as 1000 feet will be
investigated with respect to hillside development.
August 26, 1996 Page 9 Planning Commission
Mr. Pflugrath stated zoning district consolidation will require a
substantial amount of effort. The City is currently divided into
33 zones. In some cases, the distinction between the zones is
finite.
Mr. Pflugrath responded to chair/Goldenberg that a building permit
u .
reqest would trigger a development review and approval process
which would be discussed under Item G.
Lois McManus, 23561 Coyote Springs Drive, asked that prohibition of
overnight parking be added to the Topics for Discussion.
Mr. Pflugrath responded to Chair/ Goldenberg that the next joint
meeting with the Planning Commission will be scheduled when the
public review draft is completed. The administrative draft will
require four to five months of preparation time. He indicated that
in the meantime, he would be willing to meet with special interest
groups! organizations, Chamber. of Commerce, Homeowners
Associations, or individuals when they are in the community
conducting business.
In response to C/Schad, Mr. Pflugrath stated special interest
groups should contact staff'to set appointments to work with the
consultants.
Chair/Goldenberg thanked the consultants and staff for their
presentation. He requested that the project proceed in a timely
fashion.
RECESS: Chair/Goldenberg recessed the meeting at 8:30 p.m.
RECONVENE: Chair/Goldenberg reconvened the meeting at 8:50 p.m.
MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS - None
PUBLIC HEARING:
1. Conditional Use Permit 93-7 (3), pursuant to Code Chapter
22.56. - Part 1) is an extension of time request for an
existing temporary telecommunication facility. The
project's original approval was on December 13, 1993 for
the purpose of restoring communication service to the
area. A permanent site was approved at Diamond Bar High
School by the Planning Commission on October 9, 1995.
The Extension of Time is needed until the school site is
completed.
Project Address: 21308 Pathfinder Road, Diamond Bar
Property Owner: Rhinehart Management Co., P.O. Box
4428, Covina, CA 91723
August
Commission
26,
1996
Page
10
Planning
Applicant: L.A. Cellular, 17785 Center Court
Drive No., Cerritos, CA 90701
AstP/Lungu read the staff report into the record. She
stated that she received a facsimile from the Department
of State *Architect indicating the applicant has been
through plan check, completed the corrections, and have
received their stamped set of plans. The applicant will
forward the original plans to the State. The State will
issue the first letter of approval which will allow the
applicant to proceed with the construction. Upon
completion of construction, the State will grant final
approval. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
approve conditional Use Permit No. 93-7(3) for a six
month extension of time, Findingsof Fact, and conditions
as listed within the resolution.
Chair/Goldenberg opened the public hearing.
Dan Hare, L.A. -Cellular, thanked staff for their work.
He stated the approval process should have been completed
by April 1. However, due to the State's staff
reductions, the process now takes six to eight months.
Over 50 percent of the users in the area utilize L.A.
Cellular including the emergency 911 service. The
current system is costing the company a large amount of
revenue. The new system will provide four times the
capacity of the current system.
Responding to C/Schad, Mr. Hare stated he is proposing
cape honeysuckle and oleander as landscaping for the
slope facing the single family residence in order to
reduce the visual impact of the equipment building.
Mr. Hare responded.to C/McManus that only L.A. Cellular
subscribers have access to the system. L.A. Cellular is
a provider for freeway 911 emergency call box service.
Chair/Goldenberg closed the public hearing.
C/Schad made a motion, seconded by VC/ ' Ruzicka, to approve
Conditional Use Permit No. 93-7(3) for a six month
extension of time, Findings of Fact and conditions as
listed within the resolution. The motion was approved 4-
0.
2. Conditional Use Permit No. 96-11 and Development Review
No. 96-10 is a request (pursuant to Code Chapter 22.56 -
Part I and Section 22.72.020.h). for an unmanned, wireless
telecommunications transmission facility at an existing
self -storage facility located at 275 South Prospectors
(south side, east of SR 60). The facility consists of
three (3) antenna assemblies to be roof -mounted behind a
August 26,r.1996 Page 11 Planning Commission
balm.
I)RAFT
single screening structure designed to match the existing
architecture and ground level equipment cabinets to be
screened behind a walled enclosure.
Project Address: 275 South Prospectors Road, Diamond
Bar
Property Owner: NSS So. Calif. L * P., 17 West Wetmore
Rd., #302, Tucson, AZ 85705
Applicant: Cox Calif. PCS, Inc., 2381 Morse
Avenue, Irvine, CA 92714-6233
SP/Joh'nson read the staff report. into the record. Staff
recommends that the Planning Commission approve
Conditional Use Permit No. 96-11 and Development Review
No. 96-10, Fihdings of Fact, and conditions as listed
within the resolution.
Chair/Goldenberg opened the public hearing.
Rudy Figueroa, JMCG, Inc., Long Beach, 3760 Kilroy
Airport Way, Suite 440, stated his company represents Cox
Calif. PCS, Inc. in its efforts to establish a
telecommunications network throughout California. Cox is
one of two Federal Communications commission licensees
working to meet the increased demand for cellular
telephone services. Three sites have been selected in
the City of Diamond Bar to complete the Los Angeles
County network. He stated he concurs with staff's
recommendations and conditions of approval.
Mr. Figueroa responded to Chair/ Goldenberg that this
project has not been submitted to the DBIA.'
Frank Sch * ubarum, JMCG, -Inc. stated that of the three
projects being processed through the City of Diamond Bar,
the design drawings for the site on Armitos Way next door
to the Los Angeles County Fire Department Station were
submitted to and approved by the DBIA. This project will
be submitted to DBIA after Planning Commission approval.
Mr. Figueroa responded to C/Schad that three projects are
needed to provided adequate carrier service throughout
Diamond Bar and adjacent areas. Pacific Bell Mobile
Service is the only other provider that uses the same
type of equipment as Cox Calif. PCS, Inc. and there would
be no problem co -existing the services if the application
for service . was made and approved through the Conditional
Use Permit process and acceptable to the landlord.
Responding to C/Schad's concern regarding aproliferation
of antennas in the City, Mr. Figueroa stated the proposed
August 26, 1996
Page 12
project is for an addition to the top of a building and
not an antenna as required by the City's Planning.
Department.
VC/Ruzicka made a motion, seconded by C/Schad, to approve
Conditional Use Permit No. 96-11 and Development Review
No. 96-10, Findings of Fact, and conditions as listed
within the attached resolution.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
1. Minutes of August 12,'1996.
VC/Ruzicka made a motion, seconded by C/Schad to approve
the minutes of August 12, 1996 as presented. Without
objections, the motion was so ordered.
OLD BUSINESS - None
NEW BUSINESS - None
PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS:
SP/Goldenberg asked where the October 4, 1996 CCAPA lecture is
being held. SP/Johnson responded she will advise the Commissioners
of the meeting location.
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS - None
ADJOURNMENT:
At 10:17 p.m., there being no further business to come before the
Planning Commission, C/McManus moved, VC/Ruzicka seconded, to
adjourn the meeting to September 9, 1996. There being no'
objections, Chair/Goldenberg adjourned the meeting.
Respectfully Submitted,
James DeStefano
Community Development Director
Attest:
Michael Goldenberg
Chairman
AGENDA i ITEM NUMBER:
REPORT DATE:
MEETING DATE:
CASEXILE NUMBER:
APPLICATION REQUEST:
PROPERTY LOCATION:
City of Diamond Bar
PLANNING . COMMISSION
6.1
August 27, 1996
September 9, 1996
Vesting Tentative Tract Map 52203
A request to subdivide a 6.3 gross acre
site into 16 numbered lots for single
family residential development and 6
lettered lots for streets and landscaping.
West side of Brea Canyon Road and
north of Pathfinder Road.
APPLICANT: Diamond Crest Estates LLC
27285 Las Rambles, Suite 230
Mission Viejo. CA 92691
PROPERTY OWNER:
BACKGROUND:
Arciero and Sons
950 N. Tustin Road
Anaheim, CA 92807
The project site is part of what was originally known as the South Pointe Master
Plan. As initially conceived, the plan proposed a mixed-use planned development
comprised of 171 acres, encompassing approximately 290,000 square feet of
commercial development, a school, 200 single family residences and three
tentative maps (VTT 32400, VTT 51407 and TT 51253).
The South Pointe Master Plan was never approved in its original form. After
several years, numerous public hearings and revisions to the Plan, the City
Council approved Tentative Tract Map 32400 (which includes the project site),
and the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Consideration and
1
Mitigation Program for the . Final Environmental Impact Report for the South
Pointe Master. Plan (State Clearinghouse #92081040) on October 18, 1994
(Resolution 94-48). In association with the approval of VTT 32400, Conditional
Use Permit 91-5 and Oak Tree Removal . Permit 91-2 were approved by City
Council Resolution 94-49.
VTT 32400 consists of 93 lots on 47.44 acres. Ninety-one lots are approved for
single family homes, with the two residual,. residentially -zoned parcels (Lots 92
and 93), totaling 6 acres (2.58 and 3.34 acres) set aside for future development.
The 78 acre area adjacent to the South Pointe Middle School encompassed by
VTT 51407 was acquired from RNP Development by the Walnut Valley Unified
School District in August of 1994. In December of 1994, VTT 51407 was
denied by the City Council. On May 14, 1995, TT 51253, proposed by the
Sasak Corporation was approved for 21 residential units on 7 acres.
Under the current proposal, VTT 52203, the applicant is requesting to further
subdivide Lots 92 and 93 of VTT 32400 into 16 numbered lots for single family
development and 6 ' lettered lots for streets and landscaping. Once developed,
VTT 32400 and 52203 will comprise a single, private, gate guarded community.
The project site is located within the Low Density Residential (RL) General Plan
land use designation and the Single Family Residential, (R-1-15,000) zoning
designation. The surrounding land uses and zoning include single family
residential development zoned R-1 8,000 to the north, vacant land designated
Residential Planned Development (RPD) 10,000, to the south, Brea Canyon Road
and the 57 Freeway to the east, and the South Pointe Middle School to west
which has a zoning designation of R-1 15,000.
APPLICATION ANALYSIS:
Site Description:
The project site is an irregularly shaped, 6.3 acre vacant site located _at the
southerly end of VTT 32400. It is located on the west side of Brea Canyon
Road to the north of Pathfinder Road, in the eastern Puente Hills. The primary
topographic feature of the project area is Sandstone Canyon. Under the approval
of VTT 32400 the area extending from the southerly reach of Sandstone Canyon
bordered on the east by Brea Canyon Road, extending westerly to Morning Sun
Drive, including the existing intermittent blue -line stream will be preserved,
although a portion of the canyon will be filled for development purposes. Final
plans have been submitted for VTT 32400 and are currently undergoing review.
7
Project Description
Pursuant to Subdivision Code ' Section 21.16.020 Vesting Tentative Tract No.
52203 is a request to subdivide a 6.3 gross acre site into 16 numbered lots for
single family residential development and 6 lettered lots for streets and
.landscaping.
The approval of
a vesting tentative map grants the developer a vested right to
develop the tract
in compliance with
the ordinances, policies and
standards in
effect at the time
the application for
the vesting tentative tract map
was deemed
complete.
The RL land use
designation permits
a maximum of three units per
acre. VTT
52203 proposes 2.5
units (16/6.3) per
acre. Therefore, the proposed
project is in
compliance with the General Plan.
Lots 1-16 represent the residential lots, Lots A -C are proposed for private streets,
and Lots D -F, for open space. The average lot size (including the numbered
and lettered lots) is 17,152 square feet. The actual lot sizes range from 7,606
(Lot 8) to 16,785 square feet (Lot 15). The pad areas range in size from 7,000
square feet (Lot 7) to 16,785 square feet (Lot 15). The average lot width is
58.' Grading for VTT 52203 will require 2 cubic yards of cut and 15,088
cubic yards of fill.
As previously noted, VTT 32400 and 52203 will comprise a single,- private,
gated community. As approved, access from Brea Canyon Road is provided
from two points. Access to VTT 32400 is provided from both an approved road
located at the northwestern end of this tract and a secondary access is located at
the southerly end of VTT 52203. The alignment of the access road was
approved by the City as part of VTT 32400 to connect Brea Canyon Road and
the South Pointe Middle School. The boundary of this road generally parallels
the southerly boundary of VTT 52203.
The interior streets will be private and will generally have a right-of-way (ROW)
of 60', although portions of streets "A" and "B" will have a ROW of. 54'.
While privately maintained, all streets will include curbs, gutters and sidewalks.
Street "C," which will be reconfigured from that approved as part of VTT
32400, will accommodate a vehicle turn -around with information kiosk,
landscaped median and restricted access gateway.
ISSUES:
Planning and Zoning Code Consistency:
VTT 52203 represents a further subdivision of lots 92 & 93 of VTT 32400.
However, a separate application has been submitted for VTT 52203 and
3
technically, this is a new map, subject -to compliance with the General Plan and
the Subdivision and Planning and Zoning Code regulations. However, while
VTT 52203 is technically a separate map, in design and functional terms, VTT
32400 and 52203 can be considered a single project.
Under the provisions of the Planning and Zoning Code Sec. 22.56.205, VTT
32400 was approved as a density -controlled development. In compliance with the
specifications of this Section, VTT 32400 was designed to provide for the
concentration of dwelling units on a portion of project area resulting in the
remainder of the being free of buildings or structures and retained as permanent
open space. This concept is known as "clustering" and is generally applied to
sites that have topographic constraints in order to minimize impacts to the
environment while providing residential uses with open space amenities. VTT
32400 achieved this type of development by computing density on a . project level
and through the use of smaller lots than are customarily permitted in the R-1-
15,000 zone, which are averaged with the open space portions of the site to
achieve the density required by the General Plan.
According to the findings adopting the South Pointe Master Plan EIR, "a
significant percentage of the project site will be retained in its existing natural
condition; thereby, limiting the potential visual and related effects associated with
this landform alteration." VT'T 32400 as approved, utilized lot averaging to
preserve a significant portion of the site for open space, reserving development to
portions of the site where it will have the least amount of impact.
Conditions of approval were adopted for VTT 32400 which comprise the
development regulations for this tract. These conditions are very specific in
terms of minimum required lot size, required widths and setbacks. One of the
primary condition establishing the parameters for the development of this tract
states:
"Each parcel shall provide a minimum of 7,200 square feet and a minimum pad
size of 6,000 square feet. Each lot shall provide a minimum frontage of 60 feet
and 40 feet on cul-de-sacs and knuckles. Front setbacks shall be a minimum 16
from right-of-way with an average of 18 feet. Sideyard setbacks shall be a
minimum of 5 feet and 10 feet clear with rear setbacks of 20 feet as measured
from the structure to top of slope of building pad. Homes shall be staggered
with a minimum 18'. average front setback to prevent a series of similar front
setbacks. "
As proposed, VTT 52203 is consistent with the conditions of approval adopted
for VTT 32400 and exceeds the minimum permitted lot size. Lots within the
proposed tract range in size from 7,606 square feet to 16,785 square feet.
However, as proposed, VTT 52203 is not in compliance with the minimum lot
size requirements for the R-1-15,000 zoning designation established by the Code.
A"
The Subdivision Code Section 21.52.010 states "Whenever, in the opinion of the
advisory agency, the land involved in a subdivision is of such size or shape...or
is affected by such topographical location or conditions, or is devoted to such
usage, that it is impossible or impractical for the subdivider to conform fully to
a regulation contained in this Title 21, the advisory agency may .... modify the
regulation, provided that ..... the advisory agency shall first find that a special
individual reason makes the strict letter of the regulation impossible or impractical
of observance and that the modification is in conformity with the spirit and
purpose of the Subdivision Map Act and. of this title...."
Staff believes that VTT 52203 meets the criteria for this modification. The
proposed map is part of the larger VTT 32400 and is subject to the same
topographic constraints. These constraints have been found to be successfully
addressed by VTT 32400 through the of creation of smaller lots and the
preservation of open space. The same development standards are appropriate for
VTT 52203. Therefore it can be found that the topographic constraints of VTT
52203 make the adherence to the letter of the Subdivision Code impractical .
Further, the tracts share the same 'private street system and gate guarded
entrances. As shown on the plans, the tracts will connect along "Street A" and
"Street B," on the east and west sides of VTT 52203. There will be no visible
distinction between the developments because they both have access and frontage
off of the same private road -ways. Additionally, both tracts take their primary
external access from Brea Canyon Road. Further the tracts, will be graded as a
whole, and will both utilize the same portions of the sewer and storm drain
system.
One ' of the primary purposes of the Subdivision Map Act is to encourage orderly
community development by providing for the regulation and control of the design
and improvement of subdivisions with proper consideration of its relationship to
adjoining areas. Staff believes that by creating lots that are consistent in size
and configuration with the contiguous tract, rather than the larger lots prescribed
by the letter of the Code, the intent of the Subdivision Map Act is being
adhered tobecause the resultant subdivision will be of a superior design.
Conelminn:
The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of
Low Density Residential. The project has been found to be consistent with the
design and conditions for VTT 32400 and consistent with the provisions of the
Planning and Zoning Code. Further is has been found that the proposed project
is consistent with the purpose and intent of the Subdivision Map Act and the
provisions of the City's Subdivision Code.
5
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT:
On June 3, 1994, the City Council certified the Final Environmental Impact
Report (EIR) for the South Pointe Master Plan (State Clearinghouse #92081040
which includes the subject property. Pursuant to the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), the City has determined that potential environmental impacts
associated with the proposed project will not require major revisions to the EIR
in that no significant changes in circumstances under which the project is
undertaken have occurred and no new information or issues of substantial
importance not previously addressed in the Final EIR have been identified
through the subsequent environmental review and therefore an addendum to the
Final EIR has been prepared for this project.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
The application was advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin and San
Gabriel Valley Tribune on August 19, 1996 and all property owners (91) within
a 500 foot radius were mailed notices of the public hearing on August 5, 1996.
Further, additional public notification was provided through mailings to
approximately 300 property owners within the area surrounding the originally
proposed South Pointe Master Plan.
1. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and applicable
specific plans as specified in Government Code Section 65451.
2. The design or improvements of the proposed subdivision are consistent
with the General Plan and applicable specific plans.
3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development.
4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density, of development.
5. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial
environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife
in their habitat.
6. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to
cause serious health problems.
7. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not
conflict with easements acquired by the public at large, for access through,
or use of property within the proposed subdivision.
R
RECONE4ENDATIONS:
The staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend City Council
approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map 52203 subject to the Conditions of
Approval contained within Planning Commission Resolutions 96 -XX.
PREPARED BY:
Catherine Johnson, Senior Planner
ATTACEAWNTS:
Application
Plans
Draft Resolution of Approval for Vesting Tentative Tract 52203
Exhibit B, Conditions of Approval for Vesting Tentative Tract 52203
ig
Record Owner
CITY, -T DIAMOND BAR
CON i%.$.1ITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
21660 E. Copley Drive Suite 190
(909)396-5676 Fax (909)861-3117
SUBDIVISION APPLICATION
Name ARCIERO AND SONS
(Last name first)
Address 950 North Tustin
CityAnaheim
Applicant
Cunningham, Todd
(Last name first)
Diamond Crest Estates LLC
27285 Las Ramblas, Suite 230
'caoj
=" Date Rec'd 11 �4
Fee
Receipt#,_��
By C
Fpz X96 -o25
Applicant's Agent
McGannon, Tom
' (Last name first)
Hunsaker & Associates Irvine, Inc.
3 Hughes
Zip 92507. Mission Viejo, CA 92691 Irvine, CA 92718
Phone( ) (714)_gY- Phone( ) (714) 348-8163 Phone() (714) 583-1010
:EAK
617-1 S2-2-03
NOTE: It is the applicant's responsibility to notify the Community Development Director in writing of any change
of. the principals involved during the processing of this case.
(Attach separate sheet, if necessary, including names, addresses, and signatures of members of partnerships, joint ventures, and
directors of corporations.)
Consent: I certify that I am the o r of the herein described property and permit the applicant to file this
request.
..Signed
C''G _ .......— Date 6 %�
(All record owners)
Certification: I, the undersigned, hereby certify underpenalty ofperjury that the information herein provided is
correct to the best of my knowledge.
Print Name /65r�
(Applicant or) gen /
Signed /C•--- lit/` '` Date
(Applicant or gen
Location VTTM 32400, Brea Canyon Road
(Street address or tract and lot number)
between Pathfinder Road and Glennbrook Drive
(Street) (Streit)
Zoning R-1-15,000 Hillside Modification HhTM
Previous Cases TT 234893 CUP 91-5, E I R 92-1, Oak Tree Permit 91-2
Present Use of Site Vacant
Use applied for Residential Subdivision
Domestic Water Source Existing Water System Company/District Walnut Valley Water District
Method of Sewage Disposal Sanitary
Sanitation District Los Angeles County
Grading of Lots by Applicant? YES X NO Amount
(Show necessary grading design on site plan or tent. map)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION (All ownership comprising the proposed lots/project) If petitioning for zone change, attach
legal description of exterior boundaries of area subject to the.change.)
(See Attached)
Project Site: 6 .-3 Tentative Map Number
Gross Area
Lots: Existing
52203
Proposed 16
Area devoted to Structures- A,#4 Open Space 9-2
Residential project 6 -1 . Acres and 2
Gross Area No. of floors
Proposed Density 9 5 Dwelling Units/Acre
Units/Acre
nits/AcreUnits/Acre
Number and types of Units' 16 Single Family
Residential Parking: Type Required Provided Total
THE MAP REFERRED TO HEREIN IS A SUBDIVISION OF:
9507117-53, TB, CD /ZD- May 10, 1996
PORTION OF SECTION 17,' TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 9 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO
MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT OF SAID LAND.
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION
I. Environmental Setting—Project Site
a. Existing use/structures' Vacant, Undeveloped
b. Topography/slopes Hilly
*c. Vegetation Refer to EIR No. 92-1 for Complete Description
*d. Animals Refer to EIR No. 92-1 for Complete Description
Watercourses Refer to EIR No. 92-1 for Complete Description
f. Cultural/historical resources Refer to EIR No. 92-1 for Complete Description
Other
2. Environmental Setting — Surrounding Area
a. Existing uses structures (types, densities):
Existing Single Family to the North, Freeway to the East, Vacant to the South and West.
b. Topography/slopes Hi 1 ly
*c. Vegetation Refer to EIR No. 92 -*1 for Complete Description.
*d. Animals Refer to EIR No. 92-1 for Complete Description,
Watercourses Refer to EIR No. 92-1 for Complete Description.
f. Cultural/historical resources
Refer to EIR No. 92-1 for Complete Description
9- Other
Answers are not required if the area does not contain natural, undevelop6d land.
3. Are there any major trees -v'il the site, including oak trees;
YES NO
If yes, type and number: Refer to Oak Tree Permit No. 91-2
4. Will any natural watercourses, surface flow patterns, etc., be changed through project development?
YES NO
If yes, explain: Natural Water Course will be eliminated by
Development and replaced by a Storm Drain System:
5. Grading:
Will the project require grading? NO
If yes, how many cubic yards? .53 3 9 cut, 216,503 fill
Will it be balanced on site? NO
If not balanced, where will dirt be obtained or deposited?
6. Are there any identifiable landslides or other major geologic hazards on the property (including
uncompacted fill)?
YES NO
If yes, explain: Refer to EIR No. 92-1.
7. Is the property located within a high fire hazard area (hillsides with moderately dense vegetation)?
(fEP NO
Distance to nearest fire station: 1.5 Miles
8. Noise:
Existing noise sources at site: Freeway
Noise to be generated by project: Construction Noise during Development
Fumes: None
Odors generated by project: None
Could toxic fumes be generated? No
9. What energy -conserving rl—igns or material will be used? -
See EIR No. 92-1 -
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits
present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my
ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct
to the best of my knowledge and.belief.
Date Signature
For: f�u+*S�c, d50�• Yyiw�-2r.c .
EASEMENTS OF RECORD
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA .
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ss.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
declare
under penalty of perjury that all easements of record, [as shown
on Preliminary Title Report No. qS� �7/! 7 "S 3 Dated
furnished this office by (company)
rs-f Aw t.,^ i 4,a yk 7744-- Lo o E Z0.5 `� rGS are
shown on the tentative map No. S5; -a-0
and that if the easements are blanket or indeterminate in nature
that a statement to that effect has been placed on the tentative
map. The purpose and ownership of all easements are also stated.
Executed at=Y'viw�- _..... , California, this..
l 24L day of Wt"a h , 19 9 G
.Signature
Owner/Subdivider/Subdivide'
NOTE: The use of that portion of the affidavit in bracket is optional and may be deleted.
Environmental Information Forin for Residential Projects
(To be completed by.applicant)
General Information:
Date Filed: May 10, 1996
Pertinent Permits/Applications: VTTM 32400, CUP 91-5, Oak Tree Permit 91-2, E 1 R 92-1
Project Information:
1. Name, Address and Phone Number of Project Sponsor:
DIAMOND CREST ESTATES LLC .
27285 Las Ramblas, Suite 230
Mission Viejo, CA 92691 (714) 348-8163
2. Name, Address and Phone Number of Key Contact Person(s):
- HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES -IRVINE, INC. _.-.-
Three Hughes
Irvine, CA 92718 (714) 583-1010
3. Project Address:
8763-026-008
4. Project Assessor's Block and Parcel Number(s):
5. Other Identification (other recorded/rnap location information):
VTTM,32400
6-A. Does the project, require any of the following actions by the City:
YES NO
Variance: i.
Conditional Use Permit:
General Plan Amendment:
X
6-B. List and describe any other related standards, permits and other public approvals relevant to this
project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies:
VTTM 32400, CUP 91-5, Oak Tree Permit 91-2, EIR 92-1
7. Land Use Designations:
Adopted General Plan Designation:
Residential
Adopted zoning:
R-1-15,000 Hillside Modification
8. Proposed Specific Use of Site:
Single Family Residential
Project Description
9-A. Site Dimensions and Gross Area:
Approximately 6.3 acres
9-B. Legal Description of the Project: (attach copy to this fonn if necessary)
(See.Attached)
� 9SO7117-5,�.TB, CD/ZO-May 1U.1OBG '
THE MAP REFERRED TOHEREIN |SASUBDIVISION OF:
PORTION OF SECTION 17.TOVVN8H|P2SOUTH, RANGESWEST, SAN BEBNARD|MO
MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND DAR, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELE8, STATE OF
10. Project Detail
Attach a separate page of descriptive data for each housing type included in this project:
a. Number of Housing Units by type.
b. Floor Area by type (minimum, maximum, and average square footage).
C. Number of floors (stories) for each type.
d. Housing market targeted (demographic profile).
e. Estimated market sales price or estimated market rents.
f. Describe all amenities proposed (for example, landscaping, recreation equipment, common use
facilities, trials, etc.).
9. Minimum lot siz--. (Net lot area, not including g Right -of -Way).
C,
h. Maximum lot size. (Net lot area, notincluding Right -of -Way).
C,
i. Average lot size. (Net lot area, not including Right -of -Way).
j. Number of lots which do not meet City Standards.
11. Describe public or private utility easements, utility lines, structures or other facilities which exist on
the surface or below the surface of the project site.
6611 RCP Storm Drain
12. Associated Projects: (Projects or -potential projects which are directly related to this project, ie:
potential developments which require completion of this project):
VTTM 32400
13. Describe any anticipated Phasing for this project: (Number of Units & Time Frame)
Single Phase
14. Attach one copy of each of the following:
a. Preliminary Soils Report
b. Preliminary Geologic Investi.gation
e. Tract Map, Parcel Map, or Plot Plan clearly showing each area of cut and each area of fill:
all residential unit pads (if known), and any areas with slopes 25 q or more.
f. Photographs showing the site from different (ie: north, south, east, west) vantage points and
photographs showing vistas (ie: north, south, east, west) from the site.
Are the following items applicable to the proposed project or its effects?
(Discuss below all items which apply to this project: attach additional sheets as necessary)
15. Grading:
Maximum depth of excavation: Maximum depth of fill: 66'
Quantity of soil moved: 4.70,042 cubic yards.
Will there be an on-site balance of cut and fill?: Yes Quantity of import/export: N/A
16. Viewshed: Describe any change in the appearance of the site resulting from the project as proposed.
17. Describe how the proposed project will fit into its surroundings (ie: will the proposed project blend into
an existing neighborhood? How will it relate to the size, scale, style and character of the existing surrounding
development?)'
The Proposed Project .will be compatible as to massing and scale with surrounding
Residential Projects.
18. Describe any alteration of the existing drainage patterns or potential for changes in surface or ground
water quality or quantity. (ie: Will the flow of any permanent or intermittent surface/subsurface water change
as a result of this project? How?: Will there be any injection wells, septic systems, or other facilities which
may affect surface or subsurface water quality?)
Surface Flow will be altered by the Development. Where necessary, flows will be
directed to .Storm Drain Facilities.
construction will this project directly or indirectly cause the generation of noise and or vibration greater than
any that exists now.
None
20. Describe any residential construction proposed on filled land (ie: identify the lot number of each
structure proposed to be built on filled land).
Lots 1 through 9
21. - Do any significant trees exist on the project site now? Describe the effect this project will have on
them. (ie: Oak and Walnut trees are considered significant. Describe whether the proposed project will disturb
or cause removal of any of these trees).
See Oak Tree Permit 91-2
22. Is the project site located in a national, state, regional or locally designated area of historical,
environmental or other significance? If so describe. (ie: is the site an area designated as a hillside management
area, significant ecological area, significant mineral resource area, etc.)
No
Environmental Setting:
23. Describe the environmental setting (synopsis) of the project site. This narrative shall include a
description of the soil stability,* slopes, drainage, scenic quality, plants and animals which may exist on the site
now, and any existing structures and the existing land use of the project site.
See EIR 92-1
24. Describe the surrounding properties (synopsis). This narrative shall include a description of the soil.
stability, slopes, drainage, scenic quality, plants, and animals which may exist. Indicate the type of land use
(residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (single-family, multi -family, density, commercial,
professional, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, etc.) in the adjacent surrounding area.
See EiR 91-2
Certification:
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information
required for initial environmental evaluation of the proposed project. All information is to the best of my
knowledge, belief and ability to determine factual, true, correct and complete.
Date: _,52-14 - 9 �- Signature: /�-J WtA-
For Wyxis�r �isSaz�•-��s Yviw� Z't�c
Completion of this form is required to begin review of a project. Information within this form and the required
attached materials will assist the City in determining whether a Negative Declaration may be granted, whether a
Mitigated Negative Declaration may be grunted, or whether Environmental Impact Report shall be required.
Revised 1195 Subdivision
m
U)
—q
z
m
z
m
0
z
0
U11
0
(A)
------------
Al
4
7 FREEWAY
-all
?2 rt.
0
>
asa H PH 0�
0
0
r
cn
m
EA6
O
C;
Z
CL
43
to
F -
Q)
tm
.C:
U)
(D
0
CL
CL
1.
6
• c
ir
A.
/•+.. / f ! / �� It .�. �- �- ��i./ w • 'J^� i�..i•^ -%%1l� 1\
'�': ��, ,' �t ter: . �t i � ;t� i It � .i, : �..` �, / •y:
',,,.�' � � �:�''' E".� � ; ' � I tom' P • � T � t _ � i
ail tr/. / � _.. t :� �- .-�!F P i � t t D t � i' .�f ^• .
QDt
m2il�- \ ,at I K .I'`� t .5.. (i: •}''�• if/' ,,� ;, , i`i
M•,
a
4-3U
H
•rl
4J
Cd
t)
U
H
i~
4-3
d
b
N
m
rti
N
a
I
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 96 -XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL
APPROVAL OF VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 52203
A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE A 6.3 GROSS ACRE SITE
INTO SIXTEEN NUMBERED LOTS FOR SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND 6 LETTERED LOTS
FOR STREETS AND LANDSCAPING, LOCATED ON THE
WEST 'SIDE OF BREA CANYON ROAD, NORTH OF
PATHFINDER ROAD IN DIAMOND BAR CALIFORNIA.
A. RECITALS.
1. The property owner,
Crest Estates, LLC,
Associates, together,
for Vesting Tentative
2.
Arciero and. Sons, the applicant Diamond
and the applicant's
the "Applicant" have
Tract Map.52203.
agent, Hunsaker and
filed an application
On April 18, 1989, the City of Diamond Bar was established as a
duly organized municipal corporation of the State of California.
Thereafter, the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar adopted
its Ordinance No. 14 (1990), thereby adopting the Los Angeles
County Code -,as the -ordinance-s of -the -City of --Diamond Bar-;- -Title-
21 and 22 of the Los Angeles County Code contain the Development
Code of the County of Los Angeles now currently applicable to
development applications, including the subject Application,
within the City of Diamond Bar.
3. On July 25, 1995, the City of Diamond Bar adopted a General
Plan. Action wass take on the subject application as 'to the
consistency with the General Plan. It has been determined that
the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan.
4. The Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar on September
9, 1996 *conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Appli-
cation.
5. Notification of the public hearing for this project has been
made in the San GabrielValleyand Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin newspapers on August 19, 1996. Ninety-one property
owners within a 500 foot radius of. the project site were
notified by mail on August 16, 1996. Further, additional public
notification was provided through mailings to approximately 300
property owners within the area surrounding the originally
proposed South Pointe Master Plan.
B. Resolution.
NOW THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows,:
11
1. This Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that
all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of
this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The Planning Commission hereby determines that potential
environmental impacts associated with the proposed project
will not require major revisions to the Final
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the South Pointe
Master Plan (State Clearinghouse #92081040) which includes
the subject property, in that no substantial changes -are
proposed in the project which will require major revisions
of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new
significant environmental effects or a substantial
increase in the 'severity of the previously identified
significant effects; no substantial changes in
circumstances under which the project is undertaken which
will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to
indirect or new significant environmental effects or a
substantial increase in the severity of previously
identified significant effects; and no new information or
issues of substantial importance which were not known and
could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable
diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as
complete shows any of the following:
(a) The project will have one or more significant effects
not discussed in the previous EIR;
(b) Significant effects previously examined will be
significantly more severe than shown in the previous
EIR.
(c) -Mitigation -measures - or., - a lt ernat-ive s previously - found
not to be feasible would in fact be f easible and
would substantially reduce one or more significant
effects of the project, but the project proponents
decline to adopt the mitigation measure or
alternative;
(d) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are
considerably different from those analyzed in the
previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more
significant effects on the environment, but the
project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation.
Therefore an addendum to the EIR has been prepared
pursuant to the Cali ' fornia Environmental Quality Act of
1970, as amended, and the guidelines promulgated
thereunder pursuant to Section 15614 of Article 11 of
Chapter 3 of Division 13 of Title 14 of the California
Code of Regulations.
4. Based on the findings and the conclusions set forth
herein, this Planning Commission hereby finds as follows:
(a) The project relates to a vacant parcel, approximately
6.3 acres in size located on the west side of Brea
Canyon Road, north of Pathfinder Road. The project
site is zoned Single Family Residential, R-1-15,000.
-It has a General Plan land use designation of Low
Density Residential (RL). The proposed map and the
design and improvement of the proposed subdivision is
N
(f) The project site is adequately served:
(1) By highways or streets of sufficient width and
improved as necessary to carry the kind Wand
quantity of traffic such use would generate; the
site is adequately served by Brea Canyon: Road
and private roadways will be constructed within
the subject tract which have been reviewed and
determined to be adequate to accommodate traffic
generated by this project and;
(2) By other public or private service facilities as
are required. This project has been conditioned
to provide or be connected to all necessary
public services and facilities.
(g) The design and layout of the proposed project will
not�be materially detrimental to the use, enjoyment
of neighboring existing or future development, and
will not create traffic or pedestrians hazards.
Vesting Tentative Tract Map 52203 has been designed
with lots and a system of private streets which are
adequate to accommodate the proposed level of
03
consistent with the allowable density of development
permitted within the. RL General Plan land use
designation, General Plans goals and strategies and
any applicable specific plan in that this site is not
part of a specific plan..
(b)
Generally, the following zones and uses surround the
project site: to the north is the Single Family
Residential -minimum Lot Size 8,000 Square Feet (R-1-
8,000) -Zone; to the south is vacant land zoned
Residential Planned Development (RPD -10,000), Brea
Canyon Road and the 57 Freeway to the east, and the
South Pointe Middle School to the west, which has a
zoning designation of (R-1-15,000).
(c)
The proposed projectis a request to subdivide a 6.3
gross acre site into 16 numbered lots for residential
development and 6 lettered lots for streets and
landscaping.
The proposed project will not:
(1) Adversely affect the health, peace, comfort or
welfare of persons residing in the surrounding
area; or
(2) Be materially detrimental to the use, enjoyment
or valuation of property of other persons
located in the vicinity of the site; or
(3) Jeopardize, endanger or otherwise constitute a
menace to public health, safety or general
.... ...welfare;
-and
(e)
The proposed site is physically suitable for the type
of development in that it is adequate in size and
shape to accommodate the proposed development
features.
(f) The project site is adequately served:
(1) By highways or streets of sufficient width and
improved as necessary to carry the kind Wand
quantity of traffic such use would generate; the
site is adequately served by Brea Canyon: Road
and private roadways will be constructed within
the subject tract which have been reviewed and
determined to be adequate to accommodate traffic
generated by this project and;
(2) By other public or private service facilities as
are required. This project has been conditioned
to provide or be connected to all necessary
public services and facilities.
(g) The design and layout of the proposed project will
not�be materially detrimental to the use, enjoyment
of neighboring existing or future development, and
will not create traffic or pedestrians hazards.
Vesting Tentative Tract Map 52203 has been designed
with lots and a system of private streets which are
adequate to accommodate the proposed level of
03
residential development.
(h) The design of this project will provide a desirable
environment for its occupants and visiting public as
well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of
materials, texture and color that will remain
aesthetically appealing and will retain a reasonably
adequate -level of maintenance. -The -project 'has been
designed and conditioned to ensure that it will
provide a desirable environment for its residents and
the homes will be constructed providing good
aesthetic use of materials and design.
(i) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause
substantial environmental damage or substantially and
avoidably injure fish or wildlife in their habitat,
in that an EIR (SCH #92081040) has been certified for
the project site by the City Council on -June 3, 1994
and Findings of Facts and Statement of overriding
Considerations and Mitigation Reporting and Program
has been adopted by the City Council on October 18,
1994, which has adequately addressed any potential
impacts on wildlife at this site.
(j) The design of the subdivision and the type of
improvements will not conflict with easements,
acquired by the public at large for access through or
use of property within the proposed subdivision. The
proposed map has been reviewed by the Planning
-.Division and Engineering Department and it has-been,
determined that the proposed subdivision and any
improvements will not conflict with any on-site
easements for public access.
5. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth above, the
Planning Commission hereby approves the Application sub-
ject to the following conditions:
(a) The project shall substantially conform to plans
collectively labeled as Exhibit "All' dated September
9, 1996, as submitted and approved by the Planning
Commission.
b) The project shall conform to the Conditions of
Approval collectively labeled as Exhibit "B" dated
September. 9, 1996 as submitted and approved by the
Planning Commission.
(c) This grant is valid for two years from the date of
the City Council resolution and shall be exercised
(i.e. construction started) within that period or
this grant shall expire. A one year extension may be
requested in writing and submitted to the City 30
.days prior to the expiration date.
4
(d) This grant shall not be effective for any purpose
until a duly authorized representative of the
applicant and/or owner of the property involved has
filed, at the office of Diamond Bar 'Community
Development Department, the Affidavit of Acceptance
stating that the applicant/owner is aware of and
accepts all the conditions of this permit.
The Planning Commission shall:
(a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution;.and
(b) Forthwith transmit -a certified copy of this
Resolution, by certified mail, to Arciero and sons,
950 North Tustin, Anaheim, CA 92807.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1996, BY
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR.
F4M
Mike Goldenberg, Chairman
I, James DeStef ano, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify-,
that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted
by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar, at a regular
meeting of the Planning commission held on the 9TH day of September,
1.996, by- the f ol lowing. --vote:..
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
James DeStefano, Secretary
5
EXHIBIT B
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 9/9/96
A. GENERAL -REQUIREMENTS:
1. Approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 52203 shall not be
effective for any purpose until a duly authorized representative
of the applicant has filed with the Community Development
Department an Affidavit of Acceptance, thereby accepting all
conditions of this approval which Affidavit shall be filed
within 15 days of the date of approval.
2. All requirements of the Resolution, the applicable Zoning
District, the City Codes, City departmental policies, rules and
regulations of any State, Federal or local. agency with
jurisdiction thereof shall be complied with by the Applicant.
3. In accordance with Government Code Section 66474.9(b) and (c),
the subdivider shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the
City, its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action
or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or
employees to attack, set aside, void or annul, an approval of
the City, which action is brought within the time period
provided for in Government Code Section 66499.37.
B. FIRE DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS:
1Provide and locate-wa-ter-mains,.f.i.re hydrants and -fire flows as-
required
s-required by Fire -Department and Fire Code.
2. Fire Department access shall be extended to within 150 feet
distance of any portion of structure to be built and shown on
the final map.
3. Access shall comply with Section 10.207 of the Fire Code (all
weather access).
4.. Driveways shall include, as necessary, turnarounds suitable for
fire protection equipment use and shown on the final, map.
Turnarounds shall be designed, constructed and maintained to
insure their integrity for Fire Department use.
5. All required fire hydrants shall be installed, tested" and
accepted prior to construction of on-site improvements.
Vehicular access must be provided and maintained serviceable
throughout construction.
6. All hydrants shall be brass or bronze and conform to current
AWWA standard AC503 or approved equal. All hydrants shall be
installed a minimum of.25,1 from a structure.
1
C. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS:
1. Vesting Tentative Tract Map 52203 shall be developed in concert
with Vesting Tentative Tract. Map 32400. In the event that
Vesting Tentative Tract Map 32400 is not developed, Vesting
Tentative Tract Map 52203 shall not be developed as a separate,
independent tract.
2. The site. shall be developed and maintained in accordance with
the approved Vesting Tentative Tract Map and plans approved by
the City Council.
3. Exterior construction activities (grading, framing, etc.) shall
be restricted to 700 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday,
except that interior building construction activities shall not
be limited. All construction equipment shall be properly
.Anuffled to reduce noise levels. Transportation of -'equipment and
I m
aterials and operation of heavy grading equipment shall also be
limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 5:00, Monday through
WSaturday. All equipment staging *areas shall be sited on the
W%% subject property. Dust generated. by construction activities
lz� shall be reduced by watering the soil prior to and during
grading activities. Use of reclaimed water shall be used
whenever possible.
4. Applicant shall pay development fees (including, but not limited
to, planning, building and school fees) at the established rates
prior to recordation of the final map and issuance of building
permits.
Prior to -issuance --of building -permits; - the-- applicant/subdivider -
shall prepare and submit to the Director of community
Development for approval a "Buyers Awareness Package" addressing
VTT 32400 and VTT 52203 as a single development, which shall
include, but not be limited to, information pertaining to
geologic and environmental issues regarding the property,
freeway noise, proximity to bus routes and oak tree preservation
issues, explanatory information pertaining to restrictions on
use of properties as necessary and similar related matters.
Applicant shall institute a program to include delivery of a
copy of said "Buyer Awareness Package" to each prospective
purchaser and shall keep on file in the office of Applicantwith
copies to the City and a receipt signed by each such prospective
purchaser indicating that the prospective purchaser has received
and read the information contained within the "Buyer Awareness
Package."
6. Prior to the' issuance of building permits the variety of
materials and colors to be used on the exteriors of residential
structures shall be approved in form and color by the Community
Development Director as a part of the Development Review of the
model homes.
7. Prior to any occupancy permit being granted, these conditions
and all improvements shall be completed or bonded for, to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
8. The use authorized by this approval shall be commenced or
construction necessary and incidental thereto shall be started
9
on or before the time - limit specified herein and thereafter
diligently advanced on or before the (2) second year after the
expiration of City Council approval.
9. Applicant shall pay all remaining City project review and
processing fees prior to recordation of the tract map as
required by the Community Development Director.
D. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN REQUIREMENTS
1. As a means of mitigating potential environmental impacts, the
applicant shall suspend construction in the vicinity of a
cultural resource encountered during development of the site,
and leave the resource in place until a qualified archaeologist
can examine them and determine appropriate mitigation measures.
T T applicant shall comply with mitigation measures recommended
the archaeologist and approved by the Community Development
'rector.
Upon initiation of grading activities, a paleontological grading
observation schedule by a Certified Paleontologist shall be
maintained when grading in bedrock units to further evaluate the
fossil resources of the site. Salvage operations shall be
initiated and coordinated with the project applicants if
significant concentrations of fossils are encountered.
2. Plant street trees as directed pursuant to the adopted street
tree plan in effect at the time of recordation and approved by
the City Engineer.
-No - underground- util-ities--shal-l- -be - constructed within- the drip
line of any.mature tree preserved on-site except as approved by
a registered arborist.
4. Themitigation monitoring program contained in EIR No. 92-1 (SCH
91081040) and approved by the City shall be implemented and
rigorously complied with. Applicant 'shall deposit and maintain
with the City, a fund in such amounts required by the Director
of community Development to defray the cost of implementation
and monitoring by City staff and consultants retained by City.
5. A single, detailed landscape and irrigation plan for VTT 32400
and VTT 52203 including slope planting and model .home
landscaping, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect
and submitted for City review and approval prior to issuance of
building permits. Fence details, tree staking, soil
preparation, planting details and an automatic irrigation system
and the incorporation of xerotropic landscaping shall be
incorporated wherever feasible. The Applicant shall pay all
processing fees associated with plan review.
6. All terrace drains and drainage channels shall be constructed in
muted earth tones so as to not impart adverse visual impacts.
Terrace drains shall follow land form slope configuration and
shall not be placed in exposed positions. All down drains shall
.be hidden in swales diagonally or curvilinear across a slope
face.
7. Prior to issuance of occupancy permits all oak trees to be
03
replaced shall be replaced at the ratios, locations and palette
mix specified in EIR No. 92-1 (SCH 91081040) , as amended herein.
8. Existing trees required to be preserved in - place shall be
protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Los
Angeles County Code and so noted on the grading plans. The
location of those trees to be preserved in place and new
locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed
landscape plans.
9. Prior to the issuance of permits for site grading, suitable oaks
for transplanting shall be selected, tagged and recommended to
the City for relocation by a qualified arborist. Selection
criteria shall include access, health, structural feasibility
for transplantation and cost. In order to maintain wildlife
food sources, an effort will be made to select specimens for
tr planting marked to indicate compass and slope orientation.
I
T4 shall be boxed by a method which minimizes shock and
Qiios for the inclusion of the maximum feasible amount of root
&V
'0
1*rs and associated soil. Indigenous mycorrhizae shall be
included with the root hairs and associated soil. siting of
transplanted oaks and detailed transplanting methodology shall
be coordinated by a qualified licensed arborist. The oaks to be
transplanted and their specific locations shall be approved by
the Community Services Director.
lo. Prior to approval of project landscape plan the applicant shall
demonstrate that the landscaping palette for the project
emphasizes the use of drought tolerant, native plant species
with. low _water._ requirements,.-... adapted. to.. the.. inland Southern.
California climate. Also, plants used in perimeter or common
area landscaping shall include those which provide nectar, fruit
or seeds as food for native wildlife species. With the proper
selection and placement of native plants, the proposed
development would retain some of its natural value. Recommended
plants for landscaping include:
Big -Leaf Maple
Bigberry Manzanita
Coyote Brush
Ceanothus
Redbud
Toyon
Honeysuckle
California Sycamore
Holly -leaved Cherry
California Coffeeberry
Holly -leaved Redberry
Sugarbush
Chaparral Currant
Our Lord's Candle
California -Fuchsia
Acer macrophylla
Arctostaphylos glauca
Baccharis pilularis
Ceanothus spp.
Cercis occidentalis
Heteromeles arbutifolia
Lonicera spp.
Platanus racemose
Prunus ilicifolia
Rhamnus californica
Rhamnus ilicifolia
Rhus ovata
Ribes malvaceum
Yucca whipplei
Zauschneria californica
11. In compliance with Section 3503.5 of the California Fish and
Game Code, a qualified biologist shall determine the presence of
4
any raptor nests prior to or concurrent with grading activities,
the project applicant(s) shall contact the California Department
of Fish and Game, shall obtain and comply with all appropriate
procedures relative to grading operations in proximity to those
AV
vests, and shall provide verification of same to the City.
."VRIsulting mitigation measures may include: (1) modifying the
'design of utility poles, if any, for the protection of raptors
and other birds; (2) restricting -construction activities near
raptor nesting -sites during and immediately following the
breeding season; and (3) constructing artificial nesting
platforms for raptors.and other birds.
12. Prior to issuance of building permits, if applicable, Los
Angeles County Fire Department requirements for development in
a wildland fire area shall be incorporated to reduce potential
fire hazards. These provisions include, but may not be limited
to: (1) fire -resistive protection of exterior walls/openings;
(2). fire -retardant roof covering; , (3) fire -resistive
construction for decks, balconies and support structures; and
(4) chimney screens installed on each chimney flue.
13. Project design and maintenance activities shall comply with
brush clearance programs administered by the Los Angeles County
Fire Department.
14. Prior' to the -initiation -of construction activities, building
permits or recordation, the project applicant(s) shall submit
and the County Forester and Fire Warden shall approve a fire
hazard reduction/fuel management plan to minimize brush fire
hazards on-site. . That plan. shall include, but. -may. not, be
limited.to: (1) use of fire retardant construction materials;
(2) brush clearance and maintenance activities within 100 feet
surrounding individual structures; (3) irrigated planting areas
with provisions for maintenance activities; and (4) the
provision and maintenance of fire breaks.
15. In order to limit the potential threat of wildland fires, low -
fuel volume plants shall be incorporated into the revegetative
plan.
16. Prior to the approval of the, grading plan, the project applicant
identify appropriate measures to be undertaken during grading
activities to minimize disruptions to school activities* and
shall address potential health and safety considerations
relative to pedestrian activities in the project area.
17. Prior to the initiation of grading activities and building
permits a replacement plan for * the loss of existing oak trees
shall be submitted by the project applicant(s) and approved by
the City.
.18. Applicant should consider a united biological resource removal
program, prior to grading, to allow persons to remove selected
vegetation at their own expense.
E. APPLICABLE EIR MITIGATION MEASURES
9
(not addressed in subsections a, b, c or d)
The following.conditions are EIR mitigation measures not covered by the
tract conditions listed in subsections a, b, or c which apply to the
project site.
1. All grading, earthwork and associated development activities
shall be designed and conducted in accordance with applicable
City and County stan.dards-and shall conformwithrecommendations
c ntained in the Preliminary Soils Engineering Investigation for
tative Tract No. 32400, County of Los Angeles (Petra
e echnical, Inc., October 18, 1988 and the subsequent report
Petra including the area of Vesting Tentative' Tract 52203,
and such other Geotechnical reports as may be prepared for the
site and/or required by the City and County.
2. The project applicant shall be financially responsible for the
following items: (1) the construction or advancement of funds
for the construction of any required on-site drainage
improvements as contained in the Master Plan -of Drainage
Facilities approved by the City Engineer and County Engineer of
Los Angeles County; (2) the construction of in -tract and off-
site storm drain system improvements; (3) prorated mitigation
fees of contributed flows and/or (4) any permits or other
assessments customarily imposed by the County Engineer.
3. Drainage shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to the
City Engineer. The design and installation of project drainage
facilities shall be in accordance with the flow criteria, design
standards and construction requirements of both the Los Angeles.
County Department of Public Works and the City of Diamond Bar.
4. Prior to the approval of the final tract map, a special
maintenance district or other funding mechanism addressing
Vesting Tentative Tract 32400 and Vesting Tentative Tract 52203
as a single entity, acceptable to and approved by the City shall
be established for the maintenance of on-site storm drainage
facilities.* ' Terrace and down drain will be part of the
Landscape and Lighting District. The main drainage system shall
be accepted into the Los Angeles County or City of Diamond,:Bar
maintenance District.
5. Prior to the initiation of grading operations, the project
applicants) shall . obtain all applicable construction,
stormwater and NPDES permits as may be required by the City, the
County of Los Angeles and the California Regional Water Quality
Control Board for the discharge of urban pollutants. .
6. Prior to final map approval, Brea Canyon Road shall be
constructed to the planned four -'lane cross-section south of
Glenbrook, adjacent to the tract, to the extent of the graded
area. Plus, left -turn lanes shall be provided at each of the
two project access points along Brea Canyon Road shall be
designed to provide adequate sight distance. Care shall be
taken that the future grades and landscaping adjacent to these
intersections, as well as all internal project intersections, do
PO
not obstruct the necessary line -of -sight. Applicant shall
provide those dedications and improvements, and be subject to
pro -rated reimbursement.
7. With the development of the site plan for residential components
of the project, a traffic signal warrant shall be conducted to
determine if a traffic signal is required. If warranted, a
h1
sic
.1pa shall be installed by developer at both collector road
qpft4nces off Brea Canyon road. Applicant shall pay the prorata
I Nfre of the total cost of such signalization.
rior to the issuance ofgrading permits the applicant shall
illustrate to the satisfaction of the City Engineer how the
'IV following mitigation measures recommended by either the City or
the South Coast Air Quality Management District to minimize air
quality impacts -during the construction phase of the proposed
project have been incorporated into project construction
guidelines:
a. Apply approved chemical soil stabilizers according to
manufacturers' specifications to all inactive construction
areas (previously graded areas inactive for four days or
more).
b. Replace .ground cover , in disturbed areas per City
specifications.
.c. Enclose, cover, water twice daily, or apply approved soil
binders, according to manufacturers, specifications, to
exposed stockpiles (i.e., gravel, sand, dirt).
d. Water active.sites at least twice daily.
e. Suspend. all , excavating-,_ and grading, operations when wind
speeds (as instantaneous gusts) exceed 25 miles per hour
(mph) -
f. Monitor for particulate emissions according to South Coast
Air Quality Management District specified procedures: For
information call.(714).369-3600.
9. In field trailers, use portable air conditioning units
with non -diesel.
h. Sweep streets at the end of day if any visible soil
material is carried over to adjacent thoroughfares
(recommend water sweepers which use reclaimed water).
i.- The city may require that gravel be used in unpaved areas
utilized as either construction roads or staging areas for
construction equipment.
j. Apply water twice daily for chemical soil stabilizers
according to manufacturers' specifications to all unpaved
parking or staging areas and unpaved road surfaces, if
required for dust control.
k. Install wheel washers where vehicles exit- unpaved roads
onto paved roads, or wash off trucks and any equipment
leaving the site every trip in designated areas on the
site.,
1. Traffic speeds on all unpaved roads surfaces to be reduced
to 15 mph or less.
M. All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil or other loose
materials are to be covered and should maintain at least
six inches of freeboard (i.e., minimum required space
7
9. The following mitigation measures are recommended by the SCAQMD
to minimize long-term -emissions associated.with,the.proj.ect:..
a. Use solar or low -emission water heaters.
b. Use Central water heating systems.
C. Use built-in energy efficient appliances.
d. -Building and subdivision orientation should be to the
.north for natural cooling.
e. Provide shade trees to reduce building heat.
f. use energy efficient and automated controls for air
conditioners.
9- Use double -glass paned windows.
10. Construction and maintenance activities, including the repair
and -maintenance of equipment, shall conform to.and comply with
applicable provisions of the City of Diamond Bar's Noise
ordinance.
11. When feasible, construction equipment shall be stored on-site to
eliminate and/or reduce heavy -equipment truck trips.
12. Prior to the issuance of building permits for residential Lot
Nos. 14 through 16, inclusively within Tentative Tract No.
52203, the project applicant(s) shall construct a suitable noise
barrier for those properties effectively attenuating traffic
noise to levels in compliance with City noise standards.
Compliance shall be based upon the City's acceptance of a
subsequent noise study for those properties and implementation
of those measures deemed appropriate by the City Engineer.
H.,
between top of the load and top of the trailer; based upon
a level load.
n.
Pave construction roads that have a traffic volume of more
than 50 daily trips by construction equipment, 150 total
daily trips for all vehicles, for 12 consecutive days.
o.
Pave all construction access roads at least 100 feet onto
the site from the main road.
p-
Use methanol or low -sulfur pile drivers.
q-
Use low -sulfur I I I— fuel for . stationary constructionequipment-
pursuantto Rule
431.2.
r
'Suspend use of all construction equipment operations
during second stage smog alerts. For daily forecast call:'
(800) 242-4022 (L.A. and Orange Counties) or (800) 367-
4710 (San Bernardino and Riverside Counties).
S. I
Use construction equipment that has catalytic convertors
(for gasoline powered equipment).
t.
Prevent trucks from idling longer than two minutes.
U.
Configure construction parking to minimize traffic
interference.
V.
Provide, temporary traffic control during all phases of
construction activities to improve traffic flow such as
providing a flag.person to direct traffic and ensure safe
movements off the site as directed by the City Engineer.
W.
Schedule construction activities that affect traffic flow
to off-peak hours (i.e., between 7:00 PM and 6:00 AM and
between 10:00 AM and 3:00 PM) with approval from the City.
9. The following mitigation measures are recommended by the SCAQMD
to minimize long-term -emissions associated.with,the.proj.ect:..
a. Use solar or low -emission water heaters.
b. Use Central water heating systems.
C. Use built-in energy efficient appliances.
d. -Building and subdivision orientation should be to the
.north for natural cooling.
e. Provide shade trees to reduce building heat.
f. use energy efficient and automated controls for air
conditioners.
9- Use double -glass paned windows.
10. Construction and maintenance activities, including the repair
and -maintenance of equipment, shall conform to.and comply with
applicable provisions of the City of Diamond Bar's Noise
ordinance.
11. When feasible, construction equipment shall be stored on-site to
eliminate and/or reduce heavy -equipment truck trips.
12. Prior to the issuance of building permits for residential Lot
Nos. 14 through 16, inclusively within Tentative Tract No.
52203, the project applicant(s) shall construct a suitable noise
barrier for those properties effectively attenuating traffic
noise to levels in compliance with City noise standards.
Compliance shall be based upon the City's acceptance of a
subsequent noise study for those properties and implementation
of those measures deemed appropriate by the City Engineer.
H.,
13. Project security features which shall be incorporated into the
final design may include: (1) residential dwelling unit
orientation which facilitates "neighborhood involvement"
activities; (2) exterior security lighting; (3) well-designed
access for police patrols to provide optimum observations; and
.(,41 illuminated street addresses to ensure visibility from the
fret for better patrol observation.
The project applicant(s) shall include in a Buyer Awareness
'package, the availability of participation in neighborhood
involvement programs established by the Los Angeles County
Sheriff's Department to increase community awareness and,
thereby, help reduce potential crime occurrences in the City.
15. Prior to final tract, map approval, the project applicants)
shall submit a sewer study to both the County and City Engineer
identifying project wastewater flow and tributary flow to the
existing County trunk and local sewer lines. This study shall
.identify: (1) the location, phasing, bonding and details of any
proposed sewer facilities and improvements by street
configuration, lot layout and gravity flow; (2) any current
capacity shortfalls of the County trunk and/or City sewer lines;
and (3) specific design recommendations to provide additional
lines or sizing upgrade, if required.
16. The project applicant(s) shall convey access and property
easement and rights-of-way to the,County Sanitation Districts of
Los Angeles County, as deemed necessary by the County and City
Engineers, for the construction and maintenance of sewer lines
..and.as.s-ociated.facilities,.pr.ior to final map approval.
17. The project applicant(s) shall contribute an equitable share of
cost, as established by the City, to fund improvements to the
area's -main lines, pumping stations, etc. required as a result
of project development, prior to final map approval.
18. The project applicant(s) shall provide to the County Sanitation
Districts of Los Angeles County information regarding the
construction and/or building schedule of the project so that the
timing of the County Sanitation Districts" expansion maybe
coordinated with the project increase in demand.
19. In order to minimize the impact of project development on the
County's solid waste disposal system and to facilitate the
attainment of source reduction standards for the City of Diamond
Bar as contained in the California Integrated Solid Waste
management Act of 1989, the project applicant(s) shall: (1)
consult with the City of . Diamond Bar, the County Sanitation
Districts of Los Angeles County and the Los Angeles County
Department of Public Works regarding implementation of
technologies to reduce and recycle solid waste both during
construction and after completion of the project; and (2)
consult with the current refuse removal collection company(ies)
regarding design standards for access to, location and
construction of trash container enclosures in order to
facilitate implementation of automated refuse collection.
6;
20. The project applicant(s) or subsequent homeowners'
association(s) shall comply with those source reduction and
recycling and composting requirements as may be adopted by the
City of Diamond Bar in accordance with Assembly Bill 939.
21. The project applicant(s) through the Buyer Awareness program,
shall encourage the segregation of green wastes for reuse as
specified under the City's Source Reduction Recycling Element
and County Sanitation Districts waste diversion policies.
22. Applicant shall. comply with the mitigation monitoring program to
implement the required EIR No. 92-1 mitigation measures.
23. The applicant shall provide a thematic design for the southerly
en mace to the'site off of the access road which is consistent
`tobq' I
-he design of the entry statement for the entrance to
zstV ' ing Tentative Tract 32400 from Brea Canyon Road as a
o mporient of the Development Review application. The entry
statement design shall be consistent with the design elements
of The Country Estates.
24. This project shall be subject to and part of the Homeowners
Association created for Vesting Tentative Tract 32400 and made
a party to the Conditions, covenants, and Restrictions (CC&Rls)
for this project. A copy of the CC&RIs and Articles of
Incorporation of the Homeowners Association, subject to the
approval of the City Attorney, shall be recorded with this map
and placed on file with the Planning Department.
_....25_. .--Each...lot shall, be, -developed, in.. substantial.. -compliance with- . the.
final map and applicable CC&Rls.
26. Any lighting fixtures adjacent to interior property lines shall
be approved by the Community Development Director as to type,
orientation and height.
27. All slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously
maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer
until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer.
Prior to any occupancy permit being granted, these conditions
and all improvements shall be completed or bonded for subject to
the approval of City Engineer.
28. All down drains and drainage channels shall be constructed in
muted earth tones so as to not impart adverse visual impacts.
29. All residences will be required to receive approval via the
Development Review process by the Planning commission subsequent
to approval of the final map.
30. Prior to any occupancy permit being granted, these conditions
and all improvements shall be completed or bonded for subject to
the approval of the City Engineer.
F. ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS:
M
1. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, written
certification from each affected district, that adequate sewer
and water facilities are or will be available and from each
public utility and cable television purveyor that adequate
facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed
project, shall be submitted to the City. Such letters must have
been issued by the district, utility and cable television
company, within ninety (90) days.prior to final map approval.
2. All easements existing prior to final map approval must be
identified and shown on final map. If an easement is blanket or
indeterminate in nature, a statement to that effect must be
shown on the final map in lieu of its location.
3. title report/ guarantee showing all fee owners, interest
X N"Ilders, and nature of interest must be submitted. when a final
rm'ap is submitted for plan check. The account shall 'remain open
until the final map is. filed with the County Recorder. An
updated title report/ guarantee and subdivision guarantee must be
submitted ten (10) working days prior to final map approval.
4. New boundary monuments shall be set in accordance with the State
Subdivision Map Act and as required by the City Engineer.
5. If any required public improvements have not been completed by
Subdivider and accepted by the City prior to the approval of the
final map Subdivider shall enter into a subdivision agreement
with the City and shall post the appropriate security.
6,.,-. All site grading.,_. lands capin.g., -,. irrigation, . street,. sewer -and...
storm drain improvement plans shall be approved by the City
Engineer prior to final map approval.
7. Street names shall be submitted for City review and approval
prior to approval of the final map. Street names shall not
duplicate existing streets within the City of Diamond Bar"s'
.postal service zip code areas.
8. House numbering plans shall be submitted to and approved by the
City Engineer,prior to issuance of building permits.
9. The detail drawings and construction notes shown on the vesting
tentative map are conceptual only and the approval of this map
does not constitute approval of said notes.
Subdivider shall submit to the City I Engineer the total grading
and drainage construction cost estimate for banding purposes
prior to approval of the final map.
11. The final grading plans shall be submitted to and approved by
the City Engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit and
approval of final map.
12. Precise- grading plans for each lot are to be submitted to the
Community Development Department forapprovalprior to issuance
of building permits.. (This may be on an incremental or
11
13. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the
current Uniform Building Code, City Grading Ordinance 14 and
City's Hillside Management Ordinance, as modif ie'd by CUP91-5 and
acceptable grading practices. The precise and final grading
plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved
Vesting Tentative Map.
14. All landslide debris shall be completely removed prior to fill
placement as required by the final geotechnical report.
15. At the time of submittal of the 40 -scale grading plan for plan
check, a detailed soils and geology report shall be submitted in
compliance with City guidelines to the City Engineer for
approval and said report shall be prepared by a registered
geotechnical engineer and geologist licensed by the State of
California. The report shall address, but not be limited to,
the following:
(a) Soil remediation measures shall be designed for a "worst
,case" geologic interpretation subject to verification in
the field during grading.
(b) The extent of any remedial grading into 'natural areas
shall be clearly defined on the grading plans.
(c) Areas of potential for debris flow shall be defined and
proper remedial measures implemented as approved .by the
City Engineer.
(d) Gross stability'of all fill slopes shall be analyzed as
part -of - the geotechnical.. report____ including remedial . f ill,.
that replaces natural slope.
(e) Stability of all proposed slopes shall be confirmed by
analysis as approved by the City Engineer.,
(f) All geologic data including landslides and exploratory
excavations must be shown on a consolidated geotechnical
map using the 40 -scale final grading plan as a base.
All geotechnical and soils related findings and recommendations must
be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance.. of
any grading permits and recordation of the final map.
16. Final grading plans shall be prepared in a 2411 x 3611 forma ' t and
designed in compliance with the recommendations of the final
detailed soils and engineering geology reports. All remedial
earthwork specified in the final report shall be incorporated
into the plans.
17. Grading plan(s) must be signed and stamped by a. California
registered Civil Engineer, registered Geotechnical Engineer and
registered Geologist.
18. All identified geologic hazards within the vesting tentative
tract boundaries which cannot be eliminated as approved by the
City Engineer shall be indicated on the final map as "Restricted
Use Area" subject to geologic hazard. The owner shall dedicate
to the City the right to prohibit the erection of buildings or
OF,
er structures within such restricted use areas shown on the
f
inal map.
9. . Sur
Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing
completion of all drainage facilities necessary for dewatering
all parcels to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to
final map approval and prior to the issuance of grading
.permit(s).
20. Easements for disposal of drainage water onto or over adjacent
parcels shall be delineated and shown on the final map as
approved by the City Engineer.
21. All drainage improvements necessary for dewatering and
protecting the subdivided properties shall be installed prior to
issuanceof building permits for construction upon any parcel
that may be subject to drainage flows enter, leaving, or within
a parcel for which a building permit is requested.
22. An erosion control plan shall be approved by the City Engineer
prior to issuance of grading permits.
23. Prior to placement of any dredged or fill material into any
U.S.G.S. blue line stream bed, a 404 permit shall be obtained
from the Army Corps of Engineers and an agreement with the
California Department of Fish and Game shall be obtained and
submitted to the City Engineer.
24. The Subdivider shall provide drainage facilities to remove the
-.--- flood ,hazard , .and. dedicate. and. show neces.sary..e.asements and/or
rights of way on the final map to the satisfaction of. City
Engineer. Storm drainage facilities should be constructed
within the street right-of-way or in easements satisfactory to
the City Engineer and the Los Angeles County Flood Control
District.
25. All identified flood hazard locations within the tentative map
boundaries which cannot be eliminated as approved by the City
Engineer shall be shown on the final map and delineated as
"Restricted Use Area" subject to flood hazard. The Owner shall
dedicate to the City the right to prohibit the erection of
buildings or other structures within such restricted use areas
shown on the final map.
26. A permit from the County Flood Control District is required for
work within its right-of-way or connection to its facilities.
A permit from CALTRANS is required for work within its right-of-
way or connection to its facilities.
27. A final drainage study and final storm drain improvement plans
in a 2411x3611 sheet format shall be submitted to and approved by
the City Engineer and the Los Angeles County Department of
Public Works prior to final map approval. All drainage
facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer
and in accordance with County of Los Angeles Standards for
acceptance and disposal of all related drainage I
13
28. Prior to finalization of any development phase, sufficient
street, sewer, and drainage improvements shall .be completed
beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access, proper
outfall for sewers and drainage protection to the satisfaction
o,f<the City Engineer. Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot
n shown on the final map.
Subdivider shall submit to the City Engineer the detail cost
NK TA estimate for bonding purposes of all public improvements, prior
to approval of the final map.
30. New street centerline movements shall be set at the
intersections- of streets, intersection of streets with tract
boundaries and to mark the beginning and ending of curves or the
points of intersection of tangents thereof. Survey notes
showing the ties between all movements set and four (4) durable
reference points for each shall be submitted to the City
Engineer for approval in accordance with City Standards, prior
to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy.
31. Street improvement plans in a 24lix3611 sheet format, prepared by
a California registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to
and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and
an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of the public
and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval.
32. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees
shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from
the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits
required-._
33. No street shall exceed a maximum slope of 12% unless approved by
the City Engineer.
34. Construct base and pavement on all streets in accordance with
soils report prepared by a California registered soils engineer
and approved by the City Engineer or as otherwise directed by
the City Engineer.
35. Vehicular access must be provided to all "Urban Pollutant
Basins" with a minimum width of 15 feet, with 12 feet of
pavement and with a maximum slope no greater than 15% unless
otherwiseapproved the City Engineer.
36. Prior to final map approval, owner shall dedicate right-of-way
and construct improvements to the ultimate right-of-way width of
Brea Canyon Road, along the tentative' map frontage, all in
accordance with City. Standards. owner shall enter into a
reimbursement agreement with City for reimbursement of advanced
costs from development of property benefitting from the
dedications and improvements required herein. '
37. Subdivider shall pay its fair share amount for signal
improvements at Pathfinder and Brea Canyon Road prior to final
map approval based upon amended traffic study as approved by the
City Engineer.
14
38. Subdivider shall pay its fair share of other signal improvements
required pursuant to the approved EIR prior to approval of the
final map based upon amended traffic study as approved by City
Engineer.
39. Label any private drives or, fire lanes and delineate on the
final map to the satisfaction of the City. Owner shall offer to
dgIcate on the final map the public street from Brea Canyon
to the westerly vesting tentative tract boundary.
.bdivider shall improve street to its full width in accordance
with City standards, including, but not limited to, sidewalks on
one side, curbs, gutters, and street lights.
40. Construct or post bonds for drainage improvements and offer
easements needed for street and slope drainage as required by
the City Engineer prior to recordation of the final map.
41. Construct sidewalks throughout and adjoining the frontage of the
vesting tentative tract per City standards and as approved by
the City Engineer.
42. Provide and install street name signs to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy.
43. All utility lines shall be underground within the Vesting
Tentative Tract Map.
44. Dedicate slope easements along Brea Canyon Road in favor of the
City as required by the City Engineer, prior to approval or
recordation of the, final map. - The . dedicated-.- slope easements
shall be placed in a Homeowner's Association as directed by the
City Engineer.
45. Construct curb and gutters per City standards subject to
approval by the City Engineer.
46. Construct wheelchair ramps at all corners and all intersections
pursuant to City Standards or as may be required by the City
Engineer.
47. Construct street lights along all streets as required to per
City standards and as approved by the City Engineer. The street
lights shall be annexed into the County lighting districts, or
,shall be operated and maintained by a homeowners association.
48. Traffic improvement plans shall be prepared by a registered
Traffic Engineer in a 241lx3611 sheet format and submitted to and
approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an
agreement executed guaranteeing completion of traffic
improvements prior to final map approval.
49. Intersection line of sight. designs shall be submitted to the
City for approval as may be required by the City Engineer.
50. Traffic control signing and striping plans shall be prepared in
accordance with City requirements and submitted to and approved
15
51. Secondary street access must be provided as approved by the City
Engineer..
52. Prior to final map approval the subdivider shall submit a
s nitary sewer area- study to the City Engineer to verify that
capacity is available in the sewerage system to be used as the
0%. - -in thi' land division. If the system is
utfall for the sewers s v n
ound to be of insufficient capacity, the problem must , be
ai
resolved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
53. Each dwelling unit shall be served by a separate sewer lateral
which shall not cross any other lot lines. The sanitary sewer
system serving the tract shall be connected to the City or
District sewer system. Said system shall be of the size, grade
and depth approved by the City Engineer, County Sanitation
District and Los Angeles County Public Works Department, prior
to approval of the final map.
54. The Owner shall obtain connection permit(s) from the City and
County Sanitation District prior to issuance of building
permits. The area within the tentative map boundaries shall be
annexed into the County Consolidated Sewer Maintenance District
and appropriate easements for all sewer main and trunk lines
shall be shown on the final map and offered for dedication on
the final map.
55. The Subdivider, at Subdivider's sole cost and expense, shall
construct. the sewer. system In. accordance with. the. ..City _-Los,
Angeles County Public Works Department and County Sanitation
District Standards.
56. Prior to final map approval a water system with appurtenant
facilities to serve all lots/parcels in the land division
designed to Walnut Valley Water District (WVWD) specifications,
must be provided and approved by the City Engineer. The system
shall include fire hydrants of the type and location as
determined by the Los Angeles County Fire Department. The water
mains shall be sized to accommodate the total domestic and fire
flows to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, WVWD and 'Fire
Department.
57. Prior to final map approval, the Subdivider shall construct, or
enter into an improvement agreement with the City guaranteeing
construction of the necessary improvements to the existing water
system according to Walnut Valley Water District (WVWD)
specifications to accommodate the total domestic and fire flows
as may be required by the City Engineer, WVWD , and Fire
Department.
58. Provide separate underground utility services to each parcel,
including water, gas, electric power, telephone and cable TV, in
accordance with the respective utility company standards.
Easements required by the utility companies shall be approved
by the City Engineer prior to granting.
M
59. Subdivider shall relocate and underground any existing on-site
utilities to the' 'Satisfaction- of the City Engineer and the
respective utility owner.
60. Prior to submittal of the final map, written certifications from
Walnut Valley Water District, GTE, SCE, SCG and Jonies Intercable
stating that adequate facilities are or will be available to
serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the city.
61. Based on a determination by the City Engineer, the City reserves
the right to require the applicant to plan and incorporate into
the homeowners' association obligations the future installation
of main and service lines capable of delivery of reclaimed
water to all homeowners, association maintained common area
landscaped portions of the Tract, prior to fir-�al_map
approval.
The system shall be designed to permits !!"s'"Vic of non-
domestic services on each area wii2i'n -the .;hdiif6bwnersl
association maintained landscaped common area at time of
availability of reclaimed water, all to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer and designed to the specifications of the Walnut,
Valley Water District.
nO
17
File 4reqz5,�,Iecj by. �'
on.Lo(-r----__
scanning i�"raaC►, t..,,
File reviewed
d is ed by.'
on
_�anready for
destru ion by City Clerk