Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/12/2011PLANNING FILE COPY COMMISSPIS! AGENDA July 1.21 2011 ■ :00 P.M. South Coast Air Quality Management District Government Center Building Auditorium 21865 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Chairman Jack Shah Vice Chairman Kwang Ho Lee Commissioner Jimmy Lin Commissioner Steve -Nelson Commissioner Tony Torng Copies of staff reports or other written documentation relating to agenda items are on file in the Planning Division of the Community Development Department, located of 21825 Copley Drive, and are available for public inspection. If you have questions regarding an agenda item, please call (909) 839-7030 during regular business hours. Written materials distributed to the Planning Commission within 72 hours of the Planning Commission meeting are available for public inspection immediately upon distribution in the City. Clerk's office at 21825 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California, during normal business hours. In an effort to comply with the requirements of Title lI of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the City of Diamond, Bar requires that any person in need of any type of special equipment, assistance or accommodation(s) in order to communicate at a City public meeting must inform the Community Development Department at (909) 839-7030 a minimum of 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting. Please refrain from smoking, eating or The City of Diamond Bar uses recycled paper. drinking in the Auditorium and encourages you to do the same City of Diamond Bar Planning Commission MEETING RULES PUBLIC INPUT The meetings of the Diamond Bar Planning Commission are open to the public. A member of the public may address the Commission on the subject of one or more agenda items and/or other items of which are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Diamond Bar Planning Commission. A request to address the Commission should be submitted in writing at the public hearing, to the Secretary of the Commission. As a general rule, the opportunity for public. comments will take place at the discretion of the Chair. However, in order to facilitate the meeting, persons who are interested parties for an item may be requested to give their presentation at the time the item is called on the calendar. The Chair may limit individual public input to five minutes, on any item; or the Chair may limit the total amount of time allocated for public testimony based on the number of people requesting to speak and the business of the Commission. Individuals are requested to conduct themselves in a professional and businesslike manner. Comments and questions are welcome so that all points of view are considered prior to the Commission making recommendations to the staff and City Council. In accordance with State Law (Brown Act), all matters to be acted on by the Commission must be posted at least 72 hours prior to the Commission meeting. In. case of emergency or when a subject matter arises subsequent to the posting of the agenda, upon making certain findings, the Commission may act on item that is not on the posted agenda. INFORMATION RELATING TO AGENDAS AND ACTIONS OF THE COMMISSION Agendas for Diamond Bar. Planning Commission meetings are prepared by the Planning Division of the. Community Development Department. Agendas are available 72 hours prior to the meeting at City Hall and the public library, and may be accessed by personal computer at the number below. Every meeting of the Planning Commission is recorded on cassette tapes and duplicate tapes are available for a nominal charge. ADA REQUIREMENTS A cordless microphone is available for those persons with mobility impairments who cannot access the public speaking area. The service of the cordless microphone and sign language interpreter services are available by giving notice . at least three business days in. advance of the meeting. Please telephone (909) 839-7030 between 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m., Monday through Thursday, and 7:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Friday. HELPFUL PHONE NUMBERS Copies of Agenda, Rules of the Commission, Cassette Tapes of Meetings (909) 839-7030 General Agendas (909) 839-7030 email- infoCa7ci.diamond-bar.ca.us CITY OF DIAMOND BAR PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, July 12, 2011 Next Resolution No. 2011-18 CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: 1. ROLL CALL: COMMISSIONERS: Chairman Jack Shah, Vice Chairman Kwang Ho Lee, Jimmy Lin; Steve Nelson, Tony Torng 2. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: . This is the time and place for. the general public to address the members of the Planning Commission on any item that is within their jurisdiction, allowing the public an opportunity to speak on non-public hearing and non -agenda items. Please complete a Speaker's Card for the recording Secretary (completion of this form is voluntary). There is a five-minute maximum time limit when addressing the Planning Commission. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Chairman 4. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following items listed on the consent calendar are considered routine and are approved bya single motion. , Consent calendar items may be removed from the agenda by.request of the. Commission only: 4.1 Minutes of Regular Meeting: June 28, 2011. 5. OLD BUSINESS: None. 6. NEW BUSINESS: None. 7. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING(S): 7.1 Development Review No. PL2011-50 - Under the authority of .Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.48; the. applicants are requesting approval to construct a new 11.;083 square -foot single family residence, 925 square -foot second unit,'and two garagesand a workshop totaling 4,857 square.feet, on an 8.51 gross acre (370,695; square -foot) lot. The. subject property is zoned Rural Residential (RR) with . a consistent underlying General. Plan land use designation of Rural Residential. (Continued from June.28,;2011) JULY 12, 2011 PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA Project Address: 2244 Indian Creek Rd. Property Owner: Mike Tsai 18240 Senteno Street Rowland Heights, CA 91748 Applicant: Roland Wahlroos-Ritter, WRoad, LLC 2404 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 9E Los Angeles, CA 90057 Environmental Determination: This project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on that Assessment, the City has determined the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to the provisions of Article 19 under Section 15303(a) (Construction of a New Single Family Residence) of the CEQA Guidelines. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review No. PL2011-50, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the draft resolution. 8. PUBLIC HEARING(S): 8.1 Development Review No. PL2010-354 — Under the authority of Development Code Section 22.48, the applicant, Kevin yang, and property owner, Chiou Y. Lin, are requesting approval for a 728 square -foot addition to an existing 1,884 square -foot single-family residence on a 0.47 gross acre (20,651 square feet) lot. The lot is zoned Low Density Residential (RL) with a consistent underlying General Plan use designation of Low Density Residential Project Address: 841 Coldstream Court Property Owner: Chiou Y. Lin 841 Coldstream Court Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Applicant: Kevin Yang 9138 Olema Street Temple City, CA 91780 Environmental Determination: The project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA): Based on than assessment, the City has determined the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to Article 1.9 under Section 1530(e) JULY 12, 2011. PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA (additions to an existing structure of less than 10,000 square feet) of the CEQA Guidelines. Recommendation: Staff recommends that. the Planning Commission approve Development Review No. PL 2010-354, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the draft resolution. 9. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS / INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 10. STAFF COMMENTS / INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 10.1 Public Hearing dates for future projects: 11. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: CONCERTS IN THE PARK: Wednesdays — July 6, 2011, through August .17, 201.1, 6:30 p.m. — 8:00 p.m. MOVIES UNDER THE STARS: Sycamore Canyon Park, 22930 Golden Spgs. (July 13 - Bumptown - Latin variety) Wednesdays July 6, 2011, through August 17; 2011 — Movies begin at dusk after concert. Sycamore Canyon Park 22930 Golden Springs (July 13 - "Despicable Me") TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION Thursday, July 14, 2011 7:00 p.m. COMMISSION MEETING: Government Center/SCAQMD Hearing Board Room, 21865 Copley Drive CITY COUNCIL MEETING: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 - 6:30 p.m. Government Center/SCAQMD Auditorium 21865 Copley Drive Tuesday, July 26, 2011 — 7:00 P.M. Government Center/SCAQMD Auditorium 21865 Copley Drive Thursday, July 28, 2010-7:00 p.m. Government. Center/SCAQMD Hearing Board Room, 21865 Copley Drive L DIRAFT MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 28, 2011 CALL TO ORDER: - Chairman Shah called the' meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in the South Coast Air Quality Management District/Government Center Auditorium, 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Commissioner Nelson led the Pledge of Allegiance. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Jimmy Lin, Steve Nelson and Tony Torng, Vice Chairman Kwang. Ho Lee and Chairman Jack. Shah Also present: Greg Gubman, Community Development Director; Grace Lee, Senior. Planner;: Natalie. Tobon, Planning Technician; and. Stella Marquez, Senior Administrative Assistant. 2. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: As.presented. 4. CONSENT CALENDAR: 4.1 Minutes of the Regular Meeting of May 24, 2011 VC/Lee moved, C/Shah seconded; to approve the May 24, 2011, Regular Meeting minutes as presented. Motion carried by'the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Lina VC/Lee, Torng, Chair/Shah NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Nelson ABSENT.: COMMISSIONERS: r.None 5. OLD BUSINESS: None 6. NEW BUSINESS: None 7. CONTINUED, PUBLIC HEARINGS: 7.1 Development Review PL 2011-50 — Under the authority of Diamond Bar Development Code Section 22.48, the applicants requested approval to construct a new. 11,083 square foot single family residence, 925 square foot second unit, `and two garages and a workshop totaling 4,857 square feet on an 8.51 gross acre (370,695 square foot) . lot. The subject is zoned. Rural JUNE 28, 2011 PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION Residential (RR) with a consistent underlying General Plan land use designation of Rural Residential. PROJECT ADDRESS: 2244 Indian Creek Road Diamond Bar, CA 91765 PROPERTY OWNER: Mike Tsai 18240 Senteno Street Rowland Heights, CA 91748 APPLICANT: Roland Wahlroos-Ritter WRoad, LLC 2404 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 9E Los Angeles, CA 90057 CDD/Gubman stated that the applicant requested that this matter be continued to July 12, 2011, to allow for changes to the grading plan to reduce the overall project impact. Chair/Shah opened the public hearing. C/Torng moved, C/Nelson seconded, to continue the public hearing to July 12, 2011. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Lin, Nelson, Torng, VC/Lee Chair/Shah NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None 7.2 Development Review No. PL2010-401 Under the authority of Diamond Bar Development CodeSection 22.48, the applicants requested approval to construct a new 11,266 square -foot single family residence, 1,666 square -foot garage and 588 square feet in patio covers and porches, on a 1.68 gross acre (73,283 square foot) lot. The subject property is zoned Rural Residential (RR) with a consistent underlying General Plan land use designation of Rural Residential. PROJECT ADRESS: 2127 Derringer Lane Diamond Bar, CA 91765 PROPERTY OWNER: Sumermal Vardhan 320 Woodruff Walnut, CA 91789 JUNE 28, 2011 PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANT: Pete Volbeda 180 N. Benson Avenue, Suite D Upland, CA 91786 PT/Tobon presented staff's report and recommended Planning Commission approval of Development Review No. PL 2010-401, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to. the conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. C/Nelson asked what would happen to the second parcel when the 1,000 plus yards is moved to the project. site. Is there erosion potential, how will it be restored, and what it will look like. PTCfobon explained that the applicant is currently grading at2137Derringer and whatever is being graded for pools and footing is being brought to the project site. C/Nelson asked for confirmation that 2137 Derringer needed to lose some fill and PT/Tobon concurred. C/Lin said that based on the drawing, the garage will be constructed on top of an easement and wondered if the easement had been relocated or vacated. CDD/Gubman said that he did not see a clear delineation of the easement but as he recalled there will be some flat work improvements within the easement area but no structures which may be acceptable to the utility that the easement favors. C/Lin asked if staff knew who owned the easement and CDD/Gubman responded that since there is no clarification on the plans, he would refer the, Commissioner to. the architect. Pete Volbeda; Architect, stated that at last week's meeting two, designs were presented one house for each lot.: And the easement is actually on the southern lot and no plans have. yet been : submitted for the southern lot. The easement; a sewer easement owned by LA County, is not on the subject property and is about 30 feet away from the southern property line.. . Chair/Shah asked if the easement was moved and Mr. Volbeda responded, that rather than moving the easement, they moved the property line between the two parcels farther north of the sewer easement because he. realized he could only build south of the easement to make the, middle lot look bigger. Chair/Shah asked if the easement stopped on the west end of the project site. Mr. Volbeda explained that the six .foot easement runs.from the road to the, rear property line where it stops: Chair/Shah asked how much dirt would be dt he maximum m im ort that would be imported and Mr. Volbeda said he expecte p needed on the site would be less than 1000 cubic yards. There is some extra dirt available on the lot but there is pool excavation, backfilling, and final grading to be done so the dirt from the project site will be used first and whatever else is needed will come from outside of the lot. He does:, not expect the, final. amount will be anywhere near a' 1000 cubic yards but wanted. to provide, an envelope of that amount just in case. ffinRAET JUNE 28, 2011 PAGE 4 PLANNING COMMISSION Mr. Volbeda confirmed to C/Torng- that the easement is the same easement referred to at the last Planning Commission meeting. C/Torng said that during the last meeting the applicant indicated they would pave over the easement but not construct a building over the easement. Chair/Shah opened the public hearing: With no one present who wished to speak. on this item, Chair/Shah closed the public hearing. C/Nelson moved, C/Torng seconded, to approve Development Review No. PL 2010-401, based on the. Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Lin, Nelson, Torng, VC/Lee Chair/Shah NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None 2: MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: C/Shah reopened Public Comments: Dr.Michael Madanat; 22835 Ridge Line Road; read from a prepared statement regarding apparent misrepresentations to the City and "The Country Estates" Homeowners Association with respect to the 22909 Ridge, Line Road project next door to his home which has been shutdown by the State of California. He encouraged the Commission to rim plement more effective safeguards to prevent against unlicensed activity in the future. Dr. Madanat showed photographs of the project and its possible adverse affects on his property. At C/Shah's request, CDD/Gubman reiterated his advice that the. matter being presented to the Commission is not within its purview... The Commission is a land use authority and not a building commission. His understanding is that the speaker's legal counsel has. advised him to make this presentation to the Commission; however, it is totally outside the purview of this Commission. If there are violations of the building ode, construction without permits, if there is a contractor who is operating in violation of his license, these are matters that are taken up at City Hall and not by the Planning Commission. C/Nelson-asked that if at any point.that a violation has been determined, would this Commission be asked to take any action and CDD/Gubman responded no, unless part of that remedy is to seek some land use approval ;for something that was not 1==iUU K, A r I JUNE 28, 2011 PAGE 5 PLANNING COMMISSION previously permitted. For example, if there is illegal and unpermitted construction and that construction requires as an alternative to demolition or other correction of the violation to seek approval of that improvement, the property owner may wish to apply for a variance or seek some other type of entitlement in which case . it would come before the Commission. C/Nelson said that he would advise that the speaker be very specific about the violations. Dr. Madanat continued showing the photographs. C/Nelson asked if the neighbor removed the speaker's fence without permission and Dr. Madanat responded yes. ' C/Nelson told Dr. Madanat that the matter of the fence was an important issue. CDD/Gubman said he was very concerned about what he was hearing and although this is not a matter for the Planning Commission to deliberate or decide, these are serious issues that have been raised and he is more than happy to begin,a dialogue :with the speaker and work with staff to find out what the background is on this matter and pursue resolution. He preferred to know more about the issue and it is a. bit unconventional to have it brought to his attention in this forum but he is looking forward e' glad to follow up with the Commission as a to looking into the matter. and would b matter of interest as to what further actions, if any, will be taken. CDD/Gubman said that there were enforcement issues raised and there are certain limitations to how much he can respond when allegations of that nature are made but he asked that it be perfectly clear that as the director that oversees Code Enforcement and Building and Safety Divisions, he and his staff are very active and very aggressive in dealing with buildingand zoning violations and staff actively. pursues the . abatement and prosecution methods to deal with those issues. He assured the Commission:that staff does not hesitate to deal with these matters, takes them very seriously and proceed appropriately. Whatever direction the Commission wishes to provide this. evening is well -taken but he again assured the Commission that staff ,takes all of these issues very seriously. Staff deals with a- rather sizeable caseload in the enforcement and prosecution matters and staff does follow through. While this is not a matter that the Commission considers, this is something that as the Director, CDD/Gubman deals with on a daily basis and he has the resources to deal with these issues appropriately. C/Torng agreed with C/Nelson that he. would like for the, Commission to be given an update at the appropriate time as to how these matters. will or have been resolved. CDD/Gubman said he would be happy to comply with that request and it would most likely be in a sequence of updates because his experience in these matters is that the City is headed down a long path in pursuit of remedy. II C/Lin said he agreed with his colleagues but he cautioned that tonight the Commission is hearing one side of the story. He cautioned the Commission that as CDD/Gubman stated, this matter is outside the jurisdiction of the Commission. C/Lin indicated to, JUNE 28, 2011 PAGE 6 MI PLANNING COMMISSION Dr. Madanat that the proper forum for him to voice his concerns is the City Council and not the Planning Commission C/Shah said he agreed with his colleagues that this matter should be referred to the proper departments and he concurred with his fellow Commissioners that he too would appreciate updates on a regular basis regarding the matters that reflect the land use. 8. PLANNING COMMISSIONER COMMENTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: C/Nelson said he understood that the Commission made land use decisions but he believed the Commission had to show some degree of accountability and even though it may not be the Commissions final decision about enforcement or violation actions, he believed that the Commission had to give speakers like Dr. Madanat the benefit of the doubt and assure them that they would look into the matter and he appreciated CDD/Gubman's cooperation in that effort. If this body makes decisions and those decisions are not upheld, why is the Commission making decisions at all, and that is the way he feels. VC/Lee said that Dr. Madanat complained about many things which. had to do with I onstruction and clearly, this matter should be dealt with by Code Enforcement. As C/Lin said, all sides must be considered. People can share their concerns about anything from their point of view and the Commission should not spend its time dealing with matters that are not of their concern. The speaker can call the City's Building and Safety Department to state his concerns and the proper department will follow up to make certain the project applies with the code. C/Lin asked if the City allowed two side by side and vacant properties, to raise elevations by building retaining walls by as much as 15. or 20 feet and. CDD/Gubman responded that generally speaking, the property would have to be extremely wide to get a series of four foot tall terraced retaining walls to reach . that ultimate pad elevation. If he had more information about what type of entitlements were granted, whether a variance was granted, when a project, if any was approved and so forth, but generally speaking, based on what he heard, it is not something that is provided for in the code without granting a variance. Chair/Shah stated that he believes there is more that meets the eye on the project that the speaker` discussed during Public Comments. The Commission does not have the whole story it should be up to staff to investigate and take any action necessary. n u FT JUNE 28, 2011 PAGE 7 PLANNING COMMISSION 9. STAFF COMMENTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 9.1 Public Hearing dates for future projects. CDD/Gubman stated that a project the Planning Commission approved for 2488 Alamo Heights Drive was contiguous to a neighboring existing development that has been doing unpermitted grading and construction of retaining walls which has had an effect on the site where the house is proposed because there is potential redirection of drainage onto the new site where the home has been permitted. These unpermitted improvements are preventing the; developer's ability to proceed with construction of the project. This is one case where staff is moving forward with filing of a misdemeanor complaint. This is one example and there are others wherein the City deals with these kinds of complaints and takes appropriate action. This is one example of when these situations occur where the project is unpermitted; un -entitled and is creating a nuisance, obstruction or potential hazard staff is doing its best to correct those violations. CDD/Gubman stated that there are two projects on the July 12 agenda, the project that was Indian Creek that was on tonight's agenda and has been continued as well as, a proposed single -story addition to a two-story home on Cold Stream. 10. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: As listed in tonight's agenda. ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Planning Commission, Chairman Shah adjourned the regular meeting at 8:05 p.m. The foregoing minutes are hereby approved this 12th day of July, 2011. Attest: Respectfully Submitted, Greg Gubman Community. Development Director ah Chairman ma n Jack Sh , CITY OF DIAMOND BAR - 21825 COPLEY DRIVE - DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 - TEL, (909) 839-7030 - FAX (909) 861-3117 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 7.1 MEETING DATE: July 12, 2011 CASE/FILE NUMBER* Development Review No. PL 2011 -50 PROJECT LOCATION: 2244 Indian Creek Road, Diamond Bar, CA 91.765 (APN 8713-040-031) PROPERTY OWNER: Mike Tsai NSCE & T, LLC 18240 Senteno St. Rowland Heights, CA 91748 APPLICANT: Roland Wahlroos-Ritter 2404 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 9E Los Angeles, CA 90057 Summarry The applicant is requesting Development Review approval to construct a new three- story, single-family residence consisting of 11,083 square feet of living area, two detached garages and a workshop totaling 4,857 square feet, and a 925 square -foot second unit on an 8.51 gross acre lot. The design of the proposed residence is contemporary. A number of sustainable features are used throughout the proposed project, including solar panels, green roofs, staggered floors for shading, and perforated panels used as screens. The landscaping was designed to incorporate low maintenance, drought tolerant plants that are appropriate for the local climate. After evaluating the application, staff finds that the proposed Development Review submittal complies with the City's development standards and meets the findings required of the project. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review No. Pl- 2011 -50, subject to the conditions of. approval contained in the attached Resolution. The project site. is an 8.51 gross acre (370,695 square -foot) lot in The Diamond Bar Country Estates (The Country), located on the south side of Indian Creek Road, between Clear Creek Lane and Falcons View Drive. The property is legally described as Lot 65 of Tract No. 23483, and the Assessor's Parcel Number (APN) is 8713-040- 031. The subject property is a flag lot with driveway access on Indian Creek Road. There are two flood hazard areas on the property. These flood hazard areas are designated because water naturally drains to these areas and they can cause flooding. However, there are no buildings proposed in these flood hazard areas. This application was originally scheduled for Planning Commission on June 28, 2011. However, on June 16, 2011, the applicant requested that the Planning Commission date be postponed so that changes to the grading plans could be made that would balance the earthwork on the site. On June 28, 2011, the Planning Commission continued the item to the July 12, 2011, meeting. The proposed new single-family home consists of the.followinig components: 3,700 square feet of first floor living area, including a guest room, service/stor'ag'--e--/I-a---u-n--d'ry''ro-om-,--kitch-e---n-,- wine room, Wok rooffi, dining room, living room; 3,693 square feet of second floor living area, including three bedrooms, entertainment room, family room, and library; 3,690 square feet of third floor living area, including three bedrooms, three bathrooms, gym, and dance studio; 0 Two garages and a workshop totaling 4,857 square feet; and ® A 925 square -foot second unit. The height of the home is 33'-11 ", measured from the finished grade to the highest point of the roofline. When the property is approached and entered through Indian Creek Road, only the third floor of the main residence is visible from the access road. Development Review No. PL 2011-50 Page 2 of 10 The applicant has obtained approval from The Diamond Bar Country Estates Association. Development Review No. PL 2011-50 Page 3 of 10 1', ZVM 11 11 Q il MM Construction of a new single-family residence requires Planning Commission approval of a-- Development Review application. Development. Review approval is required to ensure compliance with the City's General Plan policies, development standards and design guidelines, and to minimize adverse effects of the proposed project upon the surrounding properties and the City in general. The following table compares the proposed project with the City's development standards for residential development in the RR zone: Site and Grading Configuration: The applicant is proposing to cut 6,350 cubic yards and fill 6,350 cubic yards of soil which will balance the earthwork on the project site. ' Elevations: The architecture is contemporary, with influences from Schindler and Wright. The designalso incorporates a number of sustainable development features that will help reduce the residence's environmental imprint. Development Review No. PL 2011-50 Page 4 of 10 KeS I Cl effi I a gp euelopF�regEA.2yevelp V W _e Irem UT 19 Q, WIN M Me 1 830' 155' Yes Sltle Iga k 15'-0" on one side & 83'- north side Yes 10'-0" on the other 187'-1 V- south side side. Slcle'�ar Minimum Ise in 25' 336' -2" -'north side 187'-11 "-south Yes t side �StM I'M i M, Me Hip "1"' i oi 25' 25' Yes P,*';&"�14d"'�f,�;'-iW�.�rtt�pr;$,;"-7 MIM -101, ME Maximum aximum of 30% Yes A SEA 5*10 .03% 351-011 33'-11 Yes IM T N-RA, 2 -car garage 15 -car garage Yes -,Ret5inIn V5 10110� M _� 4' high maximum 4' high Yes M Site and Grading Configuration: The applicant is proposing to cut 6,350 cubic yards and fill 6,350 cubic yards of soil which will balance the earthwork on the project site. ' Elevations: The architecture is contemporary, with influences from Schindler and Wright. The designalso incorporates a number of sustainable development features that will help reduce the residence's environmental imprint. Development Review No. PL 2011-50 Page 4 of 10 Each . floor is staggered to create an articulated building volurne.. The exterior walls are made of perforated fiber cement panels. The panels are operable fagade screens that can be opened or closed frorn the inside. The architect chose a stylized Chinese lotus * ifoi the property owners cultural background. flower for the perforation design to reflect The design turned out to resonate with some of Frank Lloyd Wright's intricately patterned tiles and masonry work. The innovative screen system prevents heat from getting in the home and therefore reduces the amount of energy necessary for cooling. The perforations on the panels vary in density depending on the amount of sun exposure. The projection of the third floor towards the south and west provides shading to the other floors which reduces the amount of heat in those areas. Additionally, green roofs are used throughout the garages, workshop, and second unit as additional insulation and to reduce solar heat gain in the buildings. I Perspective with All Screen Panels Open Development Review No. PL 2011-50 Page 6 of 10 rerspecnvevvun/*|z)creent-anexsuiosoo Development Review No. PL2O11'5U Page Oof1O The applicant provided color and material samples which call for dark grey cement panels so that the buildings visually recede into the landscape and the hillside. Landscaping: Landscaping is used to soften the look of the paved surfaces, enhance the architecture, and create an overall site design that blends in with neighboring homes and the natural environment of the site. All trees and other plant materials and will achieve full coverage prior to the required two years. The main focus of the landscaping design was to use native plants that are. low maintenance and drought tolerant and to create a sculpted native landscape that blends into the hillside. The design incorporates trees such as Western Cottonwood and Coast Live Oak in the front yard. Ceanothus 'Joyce Coulter,' which grows up to five feet high, is proposed along the access way from the street. Additional shrubs, such as wild lilac, creeping mahonia, and Catalina perfume are proposed along enclosures, walls, and decks to be used as screening and buffering for these structures. Groundcover, such as California poppy, pink muhly, sky lupine, and canyon prince wild rye, is proposed throughout the property. Pink Muhly There are existing groves with protected trees such as black walnut, coast live oak, and California sycamore trees on the project site, which will not be removed, and will be protected --in-place-;----- -- ------ Succulents and sedums are used on the green roofs which are low maintenance and require considerably less water than turf. The green roofs are approximately two feet deep. All plant types will be drought. tolerant and non-invasive species. The project is required to comply with the new water -efficient landscape requirements, which is noted on the preliminary landscape plans and will be verified during building plan check. The subject property is located within the Los Angeles County Fire Department "Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone." Therefore, the proposed landscaping must comply with the Fire Department's Fuel Modification Plan requirements. The proposed landscaping plans will be submitted for review and approval by the Fire Department during building plan check. Sustainable Building _PracticeS The applicant is proposing to use a number of sustainable and green building practices on the site to help reduce the environmental footprint such as: Development Review No. PL 2011-50 Page 7 of 10 ®. Ground -mounted solar panels; ® Green roofs used for insulation and to reduce the amount of solar heat gain; ® Screen system panels to allow light into the home; and 0 Shading created by the third floor overhang towards the south and west. The proposed project was reviewed for compliance with the City's Hillside Management Design Guidelines and regulations. DBMC Section 22..22.120 (a) (1) establishes a height limit of 35 feet as measured from the finished grade to the highest point of the roofline. The project demonstrates that the proposed building will 'be 33'-11" at the highest point. The project site was designed to: Fit the existing land form as much as possible by using the existing lot pad and minimize grading; ® All retaining walls are a maximum of four feet; ® Structures are terraced to follow the natural slope; Underground excavation and below -grade rooms are utilized to reduce bulk and to provide energy efficient and environmentally desirable spaces; ..- --1 ­ __ a----The-building is -designed -to be -parallel to the existing contours;- and -- Native vegetation is to be retained along the slopes at the side and rear of the property. The- project complies with all of the regulations and guidelines to ensure that development will complement the character and topography of hillside areas set forth in the Development Code. The proposed project complies with the goals and objectives as set forth in the adopted General Plan in terms of land use and density. The project will not negatively affect the existing surrounding land uses, and the design and appearance of the proposed single- family residence is compatible with the surrounding community. The project is designed to be compatible and complernentary to the neighborhood, and incorporates the principles of the City's Residential Design Guidelines as follows: Development Review No. PL 2011 -50 Page 8 of 10 The proposed new single family residence will conform to all development standards, including building height and setbacks, which is consistent with other homes in the neighborhood. * A transition between the project and adjacent it properties is achieved through appropriate setbacks and landscaping; Building placement was considered for maximum tree and plant growth potential; G The architectural design accentuates simplicity of line and form and restrained and understated elegance; 0 Open space is used meaningfully to reduce perceived crowdedness, density, and tightness of the project and it is used as a buffer between neighboring adjacent properties; Siting and design of structures and landscaping ensures that they blend into the terrain and do not dominate the landform as seen from lower elevations; 0 Projections and recesses of stories, porches, - balconies, and reveals are integrated into the design; o Placement and relationship of windows, doors, and other window openings are carefully integrated with the building's overall design; Window sizes are coordinated vertically as well as horizontally, and window design is consistent in terms of style and general arrangement on all sides . of the The air conditioning and trash enclosures are architecturally compatible to the main structure and blend in with the building in terms of materials, color, shape, and size; and The project is designed to be appropriate in mass and scale to the site. Vacant Lot to West Project Site — Access Road off Indian Creek Adjacent Home to East Development Review No. PL 2011-50 Page 9 of 10 Additional Review The Public Works Department and Building and Safety Division reviewed this project, and their comments are included in the attached resolution as conditions of approval. On June 17, 2011, public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 1,000 -foot radius of the project site and the notice was published in the Sail Gabriel Valley Tribune and Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers. A notice display board was posted at the site, and a copy of the notice was posted at the City's three designated community posting sites. At the time the staff report was published, staff had not received any comments from the public. This project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on that assessment, the City has determined the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to the provisions of Article 19 Section 15303 (a) (Construction of a New Single Family Residence) of the CEQA Guidelines. No further environmental review is required. _­ RECIOMMENDATION.;__ Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution (Attachment 1) approving Development Review No. PL 2011-50, to construct a new single-family residence consisting of 11,083 square feet of living space, two garages and a workshop totaling 4,857 square feet, and a 925 square -foot second unit, based on the findings of DBMC Section 22.48, subject to conditions of approval as listed within the draft resolution. zmz�e Mum I t1111M - I I a Attachments: Reviewed by: GS. Lee' Senior Planner 1. Draft Resolution Approving DR No. PL 2011-50 2. Site Plan, Floor Plans, Elevations, and Landscape Plans Development Review No. PL 2011-50 Page 10 of 10 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20'11 -XX RESOLUTION OF PLANNING COMMISSION • CALIFORNIA,F, THE CITY OFDIAMOND BAR, •.. • O CONSTRUCT ♦. NEW THREE-STORY SINGLE-FAMILY A NEW i RESIDENCEAREA, TWO GARAGES AND D i. WORKSHOP. ',•y.•i TOTALING 8 57 SQUARE FEET, AND. A 925 SQUARE -FOOT SECOND UNIT ON A 8.51 GROSS ACRE (370,695 SQUARE.FOOT)! DIAMOND • i ;r X r, i 8713-040-031). 1. The property owner, Mike Tsai, and applicant, Roland Wahl roo s -Ritter, have filed an application for Development Review No. PL 2011-50 to construct a new three-story single-family residence consisting of a new 11,086 square -foot living area, two garages and a workshop totaling 4,857 square feet, and a 925 square -foot second unit located at 2244 Indian Creek Road, City of Diamond Bar, County of Los Angeles, California. Hereinafter in this resolution, the subject Development Review shall collectively be referred to as the "Project." 2. The subject property is made up of one parcel totaling 370,695 square feet (8.51 gross acres). It is located in the Rural Residential (RR) zone with an underlying General Plan land use designation of Rural Residential. 3. On June_ 17, 2011, notification _of the public hearing for this project was published in the San Gabriel Vallev Tribune and the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers. In addition, public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 1,000 -foot radius of the Project site, public notices were posted at the City's designated community posting sites and the Project site was posted with a display board. 4. On June 28, 2011, the Planning Commission continued the item to the July 12, 2011 meeting. 5. On July 12, 2011, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing, solicited testimony from all interested individuals, and concluded said hearing on that date. E. RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: 1. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct; and 2. The Planning Commission hereby determines the Project to be Categorically Exempt frorn the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to the provisions of Article 19, Section 15303 (a) (Construction of a New Single Family Residence) of the CEQA Guidelines. Therefore, no further environmental review is required. C. FINDINGS OF FACT Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein and as prescribed under Diamond Bar Development Code (DBDC) Section 22.48, this Planning Commission hereby finds as follows: Development Review Findings (DBDC Section 22.48.040) 1 The design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with the applicable elements of the City's General Plan, City Design Guidelines, and development standards of the applicable district, design guidelines, and architectural criteria for special areas (e.g., theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards or planned developments); The design and layout of the proposed 11,083 square -foot three-story single family residence, two garages and a workshop totaling 4,857 square feet, and a 925 square -foot second unit is consistent with the City's General Plan, City Design Guidelines and development standards by meeting all of the setbacks and requirements of the City's development code. The Project site is not part of any theme area, specific plan, community plan, boulevard or planned development. 2. The --design and -layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards; Because the Project site is located within a single-family zoning district, and the surrounding uses are also single-family homes, the proposed single-family residence will coexist harmoniously with the existing and future neighboring development. The proposed single-family home will not interfere with vehicular or pedestrian movements, such as access or other functional requirements of a single-family home because it complies with the requirements for driveway widths and grades. 3. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain and enhance the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22.48: Development Review Standards, t ' he City's Design Guidelines, the City's General Plan, or any applicable specific plan; 2 DR No. PL 2011-50 The new single-family home is designed to be compatible with the character of the eclectic neighborhoods in The Country Estates. it is designed in the contemporary style of architecture with dark grey panels to visually recede into the landscape and hillside. The project is also designed to be appropriate in mass and scale to the site, whereas the building blends into the terrain and does not dominate the landform as seen from.lower elevations. 4. The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, color, and will remain aesthetically appealing; The overall site, architectural and landscape design will enhance both the subject property and the neighborhood overall. Variation in the building elements has been achieved through the utilization of varying architectural features, building textures, and landscaping. Various features are being used to help reduce the environmental footprint, such as screen system panels to prneeded m ng, eprjection eof the thirdhelps reduce the amount of energy for cooli floor towards the south and west provides shading for the other floors, and green roofs provide insulation to help reduce the amount of solar heat gain in the buildings. 5. The proposed development will not be detrimental to public health, safety or or welfare or materially injurious (e.g., negative effect on property values resale(s) of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity; and Before the issuance of any City permits, the proposed project is required to comply with all conditions within the approved resolution, and the Building and Safety Division and Public Works Departments, and Los Angeles County. Fire Department, requirements. Through the permit and inspection process, the referenced agencies will ensure that the proposed project is not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. 6. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as set forth under Article 19 Section 15303 (a) (Construction of a New Single Family Residence) . of the CEQA guidelines. Based upon the findings and conclusion set forth above, the Planning commission hereby approves this Application subject to the following conditions: I Development shall substantially comply with the plans and documents presented to the Planning commission at the public hearing; 3 DR No. PL 2011-50 2. Prior to building permit issuance, the required landscape plan shall be designed to meet the requirements of the Los Angeles County Fire Department's Fuel Modification Plan Guidelines in terms of plant selection, placement and maintenance. The final landscape and fuel modification plans shall be submitted to the Los Angeles Fire Department for review and approval; 3 . Prior to building permit issuance, landscape and irrigation plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City's Consulting Landscape Architect; and 4. Standard Conditions. The applicant shall comply with the standard development conditions attached hereto. The Planning Commission shall: a. Certify to the adoption of this .Resolution; and b. Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail to the property owner, Mike Tsai, NSCE & T, LLC, 18240 Senteno St. Rowland Heights, CA 91748; and the applicant, Roland Wahl roos-Ritter, 2404 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 9E, Los Angeles, CA 90057. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12"' DAY OF JULY 2011, BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. M Jack Shah, Chairman 1, Greg Gubman, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of July, 2011, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: ABSTAIN: Commissioners: ATTEST: Greg Gubman, Secretary 4 DR No. PL 2011-50 �U QTY EVEL P ENT DEPARTMENT STANDARDCOMCONDITIONS COMMERCIAL ANDANDRESIDENTIAL USE - iry ' L _ j --- EMODELED '. -'0 PROJECT ' •' T SUBJECT: To consiruct of a new 11 51 gross acre lot. PROPERTY _M�ike Tsai 0 Senteno St. Rowland Heightsl'CA 91748 APPLICANT: • d i ; - ,: ` Angeles,�A1 1 I Los YOUR ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO I a APPLICANT, SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION AT (909) 839-7030, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. GENERAL. REQUIREMENTS 1, In accordance with Government Code Section 66474.9(b)(1), the applicant shall defend, indemnify, and holdharmless the City, and its officers, -aside,agents void o employees, from any claim, action, or proceeding to attack, annul, the approval of Development Review d�tion 66499 37. PL 2011-50 brin the event the rought within the time period provided by Government Coe Se city and/or its officers, agents and employees are made a party of any such action: (a) Applicant shall provide a defers e to the City of defednsee1� c'ludingarea1sonable e City's option reimburse the City its costs attorneys fees, incurred in defense of such claims. 5 DR No. PL 2011-50 (b) Applicant shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against the City defendants. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action of proceeding, and shall cooperate fully in the defense thereof. 2. This approval shall not be effective for any purpose until the applicant and owner of the property involved have filed, within twenty-one (21) days of approval of this Development Review No. PL 2011-50, at the City of Diamond Bar Community Development Department, their affidavit stating that they are aware of and agree to accept all the conditions of this approval. Further, this approval shall not be effective until the applicants pay remaining City processing fees, school fees and fees for the review of submitted reports. 3. All designers, architects, engineers, and contractors associated with this project shall obtain a Diamond Bar Business License; and a zoning approval for those businesses located in Diamond Bar. 4. Signed copies of Planning Commission Resolution No. 2011 -XX, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 5. Prior to the plan check, revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval. 6. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval shall be completed. 7. The project site shall be maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of approval and all laws, or other applicable regulations. 8. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and any applicable Specific Plan in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 9. All site, grading, landscape/irrigation, and roof plans, and elevation plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of City permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.,) or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 10. The property owner/applicant shall remove the public hearing notice board within three days of this project's approval. 11. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of City Planning, Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works Department, and the Fire Department. 6 DR No. PL 2011-50 I;] M A FEES/DEPOSITS ON Applicant shall pay development fees (including but not limited to Planning, Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works Department and Mitigation Monitoring) at the established rates, prior to issuance of building or grading permit (whichever comes first), as required by the City. School fees as required shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permit. In addition, the applicant shall pay all remaining prorated City project review and processing fees prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever comes first. Prior to any plan check, all deposit accounts for the processing of this project shall have no deficits. TIME LIMITS 1. The approval of Development Review No. PL 2011-50 expires within two years from the date of approval if the use has not been exercised as defined per DBMC 22.66.050 (b)(1). The applicant may request in writing a one year time extension subject to DBMC 22.60-050(c) for Planninc, Commission approval. 1. The project site shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the approved plans submitted to, approved, and amended herein by the Planning commission, collectively attached hereto as Attachment 2 including: site plans, floor plans, architectural elevations, and landscape plans on file with the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 2. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, air conditioning condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and 'adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berms, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Division. 3. All roof -mounted equipment shall be screened from public view. 4. All structures, including walls, .maintained in a structurally appearance. All graffiti shall owners/occupant. 5. All landscaping, damaged during completion. trash enclosures, canopies, etc., shall be sound, safe manner with a clean, orderly be removed within 72 hours by the property structures, architecfiural features and public improvements construction shall be repaired or replaced upon project 7 DR No. PL 2011-50 1. The site shall be maintained in a condition, which is free of debris both during and after the construction, addition, or implementation of the entitlement approved herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether during or subsequent to construction shall be done only by the property owner, applicant or by a duly permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal ofsolidwaste from residential, commercial, construction, and industrial areas within the City. It shall be the applicant's obligation to insure that the waste contractor used has obtained permits from the City of Diamond Bar to provide such services. 2. Mandatory solid waste disposal services shall be provided by the City franchised waste hauler to all parcels/lots or uses affected by approval of this project. An Erosion Control Plan shall be submitted concurrently with the grading plan clearly detailing erosion control measures. These measures shall be implemented during construction. The erosion control plan shall conform to national Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards and incorporate the appropriate Best Management Practices (BMPs) as specified in the Storm Water BMP Certification. For construction activity which disturbs one acre or greater soil a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be needed. 2. The applicant shall comply with Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) requirements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Please refer to City handouts. 3. Grading and construction activities and the transportation of equipment and materials and operation of heavy grading equipment shall be limited to between, the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. Dust generated by grading and construction activities shall be reduced by watering the soil prior to and during the activities and in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 402 and Rule 403. Reclaimed water shall be used whenever possible. Additionally, all construction equipment shall be properly muffled to reduce noise levels. ilili:l 1 � n � LTMAOM I Prior to grading plan submittal, a geotechnical report prepared by a Geotechnical Engineer, licensed by the State of California, shall be submitted by the applicant for approval by the City. 8 DR No. PL 2011-50 2. Upon approval of the geotechnical report, the applicant shall submit drainage and grading plans prepared by a Civil Engineer, licensed by the State of California, prepared in accordance with the City's requirements for the City's review and approval. A list of requirements for grading plan check is available from the Public Works Department. All grading (cut and fill) calculations shall be submitted to the City concurrently with the grading plan. 3. Finished slopes shall conform to city Code Section 22.22.080 -Grading. 4. All easements and flood hazard areas shall be clearly identified on the grading plan. 5. The grading plan shall show the location of any retaining walls and the elevations of the top of wall/footing/retaining and the finished grade on both sides of the retaining wall. Construction -details for retaining walls shall be shown on the grading plan. Calculations and details of retaining walls shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for review and approval. 6. All equipment staging areas. shall be located st thepsiStagigarea,including material stockpile and equipment orage areat , shall be enclosed within a 6 foot -high chain link fence. All access int inthe defense shall be locked whenever the construction site is not superved. 7. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the California Building Code, City Grading Ordinance, Hillside Management Ordinance and acceptable grading practices. 8. The maximum grade of driveways serving building pad areas shall be 15 percent. In hillside areas driveway grades exceeding 15 percent shall have parking landings with a minimum 16 feet deep rDrivewlays with a lope(15percent grade or as required by the City Engineeof percent shall incorporate grooves for traction into the construction. as required by the City Engineer. 9. All slopes shall be seeded per landscape plan and/or fuel modification fopla n with native grasses or planted with ground cover, shrubs, and trees erosion control upon completion of grading or some other alternative method of erosion control shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. lo. Submit a stockpile plan showing the proposed location for stockpile for grading rans export materials, and the route of tport. 11. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a pre -construction meeting shall be held at the project site with the grading contractor, applicant, and city grading inspector at least 48 hours prior to commencing grading operations. 12. Rough grade certifications by project soils and civil engineers shall be submitted prior to issuance of building permits for the foundation of the 9 DR No. PL 2011-50 residential structure. Retaining wall permits may be issued without a rough grade certificate. 13. Final grade certifications by project, civil engineers shall be submitted to the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of any project final inspections/certificate of occupancy respectively. 1. Detailed drainage system information of the lot with careful attention to any flood hazard area shall be submitted. All drainage/runoff from the development shall be conveyed from the site to the natural drainage course. No on-site drainage shall be conveyed to adjacent parcels, unless that is the natural drainage course. 2. Prior to the issuance of a rgrading permit, a complete hydrology and hydraulic study shall be prepared by a Civil Engineer registered in the State of California to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Los Angeles Public Works Department. A driveway is planned to be built within the Flood Hazard Area, a hydraulic calculation shall be submitted together with a hydrology report to determine the size of the culvert that will carry the stormwater run-off without altering the original drainage path. 1. Prior to the issuance of any permits, the applicant shall provide written permission to the satisfaction of the City from any property owners which will be affected by offsite grading. E. SEWERS/SEPTIC TANK 1. Applicant shall obtain connection permit(s) from the City and County Sanitation District prior to issuance of building permits. 1. Plans shall conform to State and Local Building Code (i.e., 2010 California Building Code, California Plumbing Code, California Mechanical Code, and the California Electrical Code) requirements and all other applicable construction codes, ordinances and regulations in effect at the time of plan check submittal. 2. Provisions for Cal Green shall be implemented onto plans and certification provided by a third party as required by the Building Division. Specific water, waste, low VOC, and related conservation measures shall be shown on plans. 3. Fire sprinklers are required for new single family dwellings. - 4. The soils report shall incorporate specific requirements for the MSE retaining 10 DR No. 'PL 2011-50 walls and plans shall implement all special inspection criteria as required by the manufacturer. 5. Electrical plans show . ing main panel size, distribution to subpanels, solar array, and related panel schedules are required. 6. Glass railing shall be designed for the special requirements listed in CBC 2407 including factor of safety of 4, top rail that can span between two glass panels if one fails, and be tempered glass. 7. The master sitting area shall have adequate natural ventilation 8. Skylights shall be listed and be appropriately screened and shatterproof. 9. All green roofs shall have plants that are slow growing which require limited maintenance. All controllers and equipment shall be located away from any drop offs. 10. Parking lifts require separate structural design. 11. Roof drainage plan shall be provided showing required slope, area drains, waterproofing of roof structure, overflow drains, and other special design measures. 12. The garage shall be designed as and n ss oapriggroup with appropriate ventilation unlprovided with a fire wall reducing any area to less than 3000 sf per CBC 406.1. 13. occupancy of the facilities shall not -commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been met. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 14. Solid waste management of construction material shall incorporate recycling material collection per Diamond Bar Municipal Code 8.16 of Title 8. 15. The minimum design load for wind in this area is 95 M.P.H. exposures "C" and the site is within seismic zone D or E. The applicant shall submit drawings and calculations prepared by a California State licensed Architect/Engineer with wet stamp and signature. 16. This project shall comply with the energy conservation requirements of the State of California Energy commission. All lighting shall be high efficacy or equivalent per the current California Energy Code. 17. Submit Public Works Department approved grading plans showing clearly all finish elevations, drainage, and retaining walls locations. 18. "Separate permits are required for pool, spa, retaining walls, solar panels, and enclosure structures" and shall be noted on plans. 11 DR No. PL 2011-50 19. A height survey may be required at completion of framing. 20. All balconies shall be designed for 601b. live load. 21. Guardrails shall be designed for 20 load applied laterally at the top of the rail. 22. Indicate all easements on the site plan. 23. Fire Department approval shall be required. Contact the Fire Department to check the fire zone for the location of your property. If this project is located in High Hazard Fire Zone it shall meet of requirements of the fire zone. a. All unenclosed under -floor areas shall be constructed as exterior wall. b. All openings into the attic, floor and/or other* enclosed areas shall be covered with corrosion -resistant wire mesh not less than 1/4 inch or more than 1/2 inch in any dimension except where such openings are equipped with sash or door. c. Eaves shall be protected. d. Exterior construction shall be one-hour or non-combustible. e. A fuel modification plan is required to be submitted to the Fuel Modification Unit of LA County Fire. 24. All retaining -walls. shall be submitted to the Building & Safety and Public Work Departments for review and approval. 25. Submit grading plans showing clearly all finish elevations, drainage, and retaining wall locations. No building permits shall be issued prior to submitting a pad certification. 26. The project shall be protected by a construction fence and shall comply with the NPDES & BMP requirements (sand bags, etc.). 27. Check drainage patterns with Engineering Department. Surface water shall drain away from building at a 2% minimum slope. 28. Specify location of tempered glass as required by code. 29. Specify 1/4"/ft slope for all flat surfaces/ decks with approved water proofing material. Also, provide guardrail connection detail (height, spacing, etc.). 30. Bodies of water that are greater than 18" in depth shall have the required barriers to prevent unintentional access per CBC 3904.4. 12 DR No. PL 2011-50 N 31. Special inspections and structural observation will be required in conformance to CBC 1704 to 1709. 32. A soils report is required and all recommendations of the soils report shall be adhered to. 33. Slope setbacks consistent with California Building Code Figure 1805.3.1. Foundations shall provide a minimum distance to daylight. 34. Properties shall be �innaitod7r ddshall not occur from pn am Monday through Saturday, Sundays, and holidays. 36. Handrails and guardrails shall be provided at all drops over 30" including landscaped areas. 36. All steps and drops over 30" in a normal path of travel between buildings shall meet all rise, run, guardrail, and handrail requirements. WIN 13 DR No. PL 2011-50 ------------ • .,':�1 OM lam O o\ ., i 8 �F^ �i S sus T ¢ nom\.` . - p'u^"R to! MW "'€ _9922^ s �Se�} pS' Fhb. � v� '"� � gF�a x FS L�� � qq9 / 1' .a \ ` 1\3. 1 \ �-(t•. � \\`` ` � > am OEM �^ Bmywit Am m Aim A g .ga NU A� r ,i� � v f/ o,' �eir�'' ��r '•-_..0✓_____ ••� i iagv n ,T,rsn &q� /' .ii L 'C' G` /�f\ y Sd V H ' ' --- £� ,�056� /�Sl� '� � /' Z_ ------ r,,u-_ � - _____-�_ ire w_ f €�&�aa9� a�OZs a< ¢ Fes$ o S^ s� k H r -- C ?; FF2 ¢$9jjFEF's 2.��. D 42 :4R 2^< 4 2 O wPN Big H � <m � D� r R C ?; FF2 ¢$9jjFEF's 2.��. D 42 :4R 2^< 4 2 O wPN Big C :c Rn D n i i %r N !r II i' i f r i r H5 ! €�gayvi gfff H9 ���� Osi RE R11 214 s6e� N 9. II f TN 77IR o yF. k,���<< � I 9:51 ttp�� } �'� UJi•, Iy" S E o�� N al v s Fir,_ 3 Bn 6 R n S pia " E F B Ct?m 3b g�4FHIM 43+6�b O O 5 ��'•.�+�% C�pp}C G� C�pp�yy gCsP� gGP�ST pg pG��p gg Cy g 6GSg gg���pE i� Eu Q.. -3 M1 I la, '141 '1111 1 r� Rp T ;O y� T r' ✓ ------------------- I — h � T r IT " it 11111 Itl t. ; ��� � }VII11 illil'I1:'I II I� � � Cii , 1, I't 1 1! P�l� I +" �t� � I ^,—p —� � ////?IJJJ c � 1�', I � - � ; . '✓ . �. �. --� B 41 B ,I ��I III ill II�1.1111111 "I LIAjs, �! \;.. \. t 1 II Ii;I1 1i it Im• �� �_I 1� _y♦ \ I l! 1�jl IIIII'1�1411II II''h1'li1'lllll:li i 1� "•'�? I llll I f1 1 'III ( —�lsl r�_. NNNNZ �Iplll i VIII 1. g s) 1 em''''u 1`4 i11a1i'f' NANM I I �illll 11111 11 111 ,Il ltl Ili ll'•,I t,i'll��i � —e _ , �A I L:\ A./ I — I, pp ae IM, Ij i 1.1 f tI�L�� iy�J �� ME N a ► g�� e$� �� � e €C �e 'M tj • I � I I' 4 'M tj I � I I' 4 �9 rA 4y 9c. �I p .n •.74ir9Svaa iflu O . O F P i •. \•`-,_;�%5�. p pp 4+g cj ;.,�je oPs lyepy�y eNic�� s�s �ala Off cs Ea }aGe WE 111. gel! 0 tj eIS rA 4y 9c. p .n •.74ir9Svaa iflu O . O F P i •. \•`-,_;�%5�. p pp 4+g cj ;.,�je oPs lyepy�y eNic�� s�s �ala Off cs Ea }aGe WE 111. gel! 0 i gay ��si HO HE e� :T �O :D j d °o I 1 I TIM-: I it w i T 1 I II I j l I I I I III ��II IIII �I II 1 1' I I II ;.. gg �1 p 1 p e 5! •r> 6 " E'n C! ole a p e gq jBe� aa M' £ �. 9 4� gu 3# •SBL e@ g �. O if'I �I .iI_:i III VII III �I I i I t I III il: i,: i -. FEE_ B 5 II II Ififty i I I I I(1 I'lll III I... Iljil I,Ill lii 111 II I �'i 1 ' II��cL( II�II��I.,Ii�!d III h Oil nn •1� _ o TTII � i T 1 � I i ;.. gg �1 p 1 p e 5! •r> 6 " E'n C! ole a p e gq jBe� aa M' £ �. 9 4� gu 3# •SBL e@ g �. O �� .} �' � oePpF t{fr' ppii C•pp2p CS S�' efi�S •pF'S( t�yy B�YCFpp ggpp Oil nn •1� gg Bd tE��dg pCPyJT gS E 0 �_� 1 9_ of tiff Xf g':issy' ¢��3i8�iT[g f �. F Rg GCRg Cif e•� aoE Fi�'�1iF GG . C1 4§111H11,111 log!' D. 0 .. D 0 D m ' m N N lit V N 6 '''---d..-1 I � al� i A 4 Qi3� Qy IN pp 9' y i � 8g 3• - ,pr 1Yep S tpy�it G� @� �. fi §E��,9g]e�g'g des "ll, id! ME Rel h4v "'e'zid� i ;lm�,nmml 1. !r — �'�= fk` Sn :P2 V 6 I � al� i A 4 Qi3� Qy IN pp 9' y i � 8g 3• - ,pr 1Yep S tpy�it G� @� �. fi §E��,9g]e�g'g des "ll, id! ME Rel i KA fie lfl 1pi fo FRY e. Yic ' � I 11 6+ � pTOD ti •. p k (�•j+' � 9 y`�� f�F i fie lfl 1pi fo FRY ' � I 11 6+ � pTOD ti •. p k (�•j+' � 9 y`�� f�F i fie lfl 1pi fo FRY C. 31 gill RIE M 5§111 �!E 1111 Ml Tp S. 31 gill RIE M 5§111 �!E 1111 Ml Tp 31 gill RIE M 5§111 �!E 1111 Ml D �y 7,•��lpo{lani:dg�G ��r1. _ C 11 '.Yyi� P i 1'l-p:S2F6uy' 1 Eos • t +,.e xsa; 6'0 r� >. �{, 1 ^ (�; 1£ a �, t , �*n� � r,,�, �'j,!5 �'" !k $'�PFE, g �� �y�y �p ry�pp �,¢yy ❑¢pp &,, �kfi e$Q�0 ¢5�3:[;ti�E C$5� CB8E $e^p§ e�eey`y $kggaF} 4Edp( jgR;�E�9pt$ ga at gqa ogi AAgp �`:Ce ji D_ x.33 x,5,2 end g�F�SEs �H f LB G mniii °�E65 5f s: c�. 3�' O P-- --- — __—__—_ K.0 ,. 4 ' D I•^,' P i 5 p ot�P ��.. f� E t$ ���`F~ ��FiSE{y�r �- €' �'� N 1£ a �, t , �*n� � r,,�, �'j,!5 �'" !k $'�PFE, g �� �y�y �p ry�pp �,¢yy ❑¢pp &,, �kfi e$Q�0 ¢5�3:[;ti�E C$5� CB8E $e^p§ e�eey`y $kggaF} 4Edp( jgR;�E�9pt$ ga at gqa ogi AAgp �`:Ce ji end g�F�SEs �H f LB G mniii °�E65 5f s: c�. 3�' O C0_ iI ---- — ----- 43 Il a JAI tj RI HUR ii i peg REHM, 9UP ci A� €A h� •n 0 D D .n+>avrv.+ A.� Fp eN • v. 0 1p m Fit PEI 111 1811 1 :€ OD Sg fill ID Is o -------- re - - - - - - ----1 ; 4, I Li LF I III Af Ell F! ID CO I Ll Ri v gull ME W1 Is BC S > (D-- — _r_lr_ O- - -I- I- 0- -- 4--1--- m -1--- m ------------ iL) air.K. Rt "9olli R3 lgif Hir M, 1§1 M .Tw.fm�,m+.nv.Dn:fa:f�wi. Wt 'k y o i f i 1 i i i :rn Ell. i a ------------ i i i i i i i i y o i f i 1 i i i yy 3 A I !q i s CT (f1 A 6 J NOF yh;g aFc � &dc� IzI I l y o + 6 9cn yy 3 A t T n I !q i CT (f1 A NOF yh;g aFc � &dc� ir G 8Ulf nn.dsrnrrtvntuf_ RD Ar.rwJP.fwWt.I+..ttottvDnmr+..w�.w.+/t�vltrOrut.w4,6.�. M.In.[nar tv:va.[vemt I N s � N A N .II I 4 (0 O ip ( ( D I ,2 ASA e} Y� o pSE Si C SR5 S��g E 4S11 �g3sy gQd18o1$ o��i 4 yy aa S�v�4� �5v I i y I I j P 1pl I I --0 m EOM 0 I Ll I I s I I ASA e} Y� o pSE Si C SR5 S��g E 4S11 �g3sy gQd18o1$ o��i 4 yy aa S�v�4� �5v I i 52 i °� MR 1.11wi� iM m��� �e�3�� a&�$ Pit, g 1 J L N CO P' J L CO P' 0 �y�ri5 SY§ { ZFi Y sd 15; 1u;HE 0 oN �a IS �- •e s�''v cE ed ss c� p ds° 6g a ..— C4e�•��D ao��i i1 �y�ri5 SY§ { ZFi Y sd 15; 1u;HE 0 s�''v cE ed ss c� p ds° 6g a �...u..w..m*+wnrm: �.w •rt �..c.umF:r..n..J��ar F`Y+••. u. wu:a�.n �. m.. I s'at • � ,l of "e_ �T �'G © U1, 1 {01'9 6i �,. G � co m ct s'�,''is,..+•I ''Vita' H 41� JJ fp IU �J ;4 1� ez PFFI `§ 3 11 ar' ,F oafl Gert Gt ppF C�€� dG�J C ppv MSSgSSE6 Yui iaFdd 1eGi W1 a - i I s'at • � ,l of "e_ �T �'G © U1, 1 {01'9 6i �,. G � co m 7 E P -fig JJ qo �J ;4 j. ('i75O OLO tCO ez PFFI `§ 3 11 ar' ,F oafl Gert Gt ppF C�€� dG�J C ppv MSSgSSE6 Yui iaFdd 1eGi W1 D - G' N n l coit 7 E P -fig JJ ez PFFI `§ 3 11 ar' ,F oafl Gert Gt ppF C�€� dG�J C ppv MSSgSSE6 Yui iaFdd 1eGi W1 D S m 9A ' y� fll 4 R K e P" Win; 5.y- e Win; 5.y- 0 `t—_.�_��•� e"a�'s s� r stp� cog c�>g' ifil ii i ��i �� E �a6 I^ ^� �m o!n u p�u OCA r com �� o' G7 > € € 09 00 �m °mo O v °o A Am m om mc° m m D ° 'O Zn F A9-:2 `°mymz o Z o p i -o 09 (ZA n� ° z oy vpi m '�iA °m9 OO GH CT p N m On D m- 9-9y mFnm m� Z zgm nam -niEa y o ii p ,17 m m' 9m ° �A g " <y m�"z D �� O5� mg ez �$ Sim C'- Ps o p ogm r m Po �m �m z t = m� o m>9> i>m e� x o� o °p z r0 GCyTm O p''11p n Z N T Dn Z-mlm Z mZ - ? 9 Oy mAm O go F N� P 0 G1xF 2 iT =o �Z � mpc Hca O � � 9 zz m n mo 5c —I ° m9�9iriri �� m £y� 2N o0 o zy ��� z o C< m -n g, mpE M $ g.GN! °fie s m U nx z4 m mo zz Z ye m i as ." Cn mm "M 5.'S "� mm mw of B 0m c0Lz O n m z� m a m �m � .`�A � i n mm $T � j ! ; a Z. m o. 5 OOm m m S>� �o �S� ° aI ZZ°p ° A 6" 0 1Sn; o in O.nn� o�A �m Z NA j �cfo� $AZ x F o z�°og F2 ovin- ''vo c m a m o a v' moinm Jaz o mo $y i m c�'z ( On n g o m om m�9 e� �'zS y $z < w $� oy N F K i� o= "°2° z n- zz m S mo f 09min in � F <mN n �- cs p A� oma oy yy m °m ZA ° �o. Z o. - S N oo "z ZZym v2iZ Zn O t� [��C pi Fm p O ° rt�i Cn $$ �y1 2m DZV MZ m2 Gc 2 my -1m m. ov2i O 3 A ➢ 4 Y -0. Np y r tai O t�iOml �mn 2y Ain nA � m y v in , m y m A S°; n ~ 3 0 � O a �xn in P K S zm >>nm oaz° n2 - - sz in in in i m m9 f n z v 2� Z 4N O N m� O Z m iC N s ao 0in in m AN y s in m° ° 9m9"., mmm�rnm0000000000non000n0 oommmmmm a pppa--was X. i- XP7"�n" PczTmi� i'- zg3F-`amrpoco�znnn000,?;t orp i-(-vjn mmf aycAi6 �gp!' '� W W iiOgoo-00-0 Don o0On0000nm mmmmm a aaaaaAmoAaz m o $S oOm 0000�-mc moacaoa Ao cmrmo oo -+zc C zx,zZ�m� i z zf mpm3omzzypz��< '.0 in za �mm gmN op —I cm °zo poo �z mzn oobm ozmc� mZ oz�o�'�'�a�'��a "' po zra gym- m��o r-Isy -am7� -zo O m mp 9 m a� zuTi Z o �coiZ oz F (n $ m 9 A m m m z in in •.j-1yy{ yyy NN Nm Nm mNNN NNA.9p�1m9999999000ZZZZ x333333 ?: 3=�!-zZ y'•c. ui:o00 -Din 9 Dye=rtlnf Topes TGVI OI-yl��'�OnO•a-1-1..._C(nZonm xm At O< -I In y �Oyyyy yyNNNN%2 N(nNNNum�! 99999999-OOZZZZz333333 r0 ri10C222 OOxo Op -i -iD 99x-OOm00002p OOOAO�91 GZC O OC--mmm Cy < 9999 n99 m Dm�xm�yOa�mCyOOZZa�CZOCtn�tZ°tZ�tt3-yy�1-i�-iry�jz000��O��OZy�ZZtIYinm- �oN9^OC°C Tmy C�zC"'OT-m$ZNo.Zmomoz�ORMM N OA 33ZZ3°mag� -'O�pm nNczi som zz m m000� s zmsntin 3� � �z �0.> -0 D in mG> ti Ocn mm -°- ,czi x z z m vo z in y O 2 O 0 N m G) 0ON N o m �' x0 Dr -i 1 oaa7J D�m'SS co zZ in y Z < Z Z m m O -n {A r m kkRRRRA> D Z T MUM --I " o6H in �m m yyg �mm. Z > OO G) m W O N �' N m O T 0 0 0 0 0 X M P_ z Z --I X D m = S�H��oo'mu�uu m co 4 r OC/) 00 GmNNn non Z X kkRRRRA> 41 T MUM " o6H in yyg �mm. OO wnc O N �' N m Guaun mdnn 9tivm os Rini r_l FNA FNTI NAI F UlinIn.0 o m ro 0 ii [a to Ila! Ell 9 a T T bi RInC r. I FMFNTI HAI P STIInInS I o m ro 0 ii [a to Ila! Ell 9 a m ch RInC r. I FMFNTI HAI P STIInInS § i . . ! ' 3[. :. . . . . . . Pin, 171 RAFNTIHA[T . . . STUDIOS^w .4 . . 3[. :. . . . . . . Pin, 171 RAFNTIHA[T . . . STUDIOS^w i _ _ \ I m Tz -_ �a ainc ci FNAFKITI NAI F �TIIMH �1 �i [� 1 I D n F1 F1 F1 n 1 F1z � m a s 4 q i _ _ \ I m Tz -_ �a ainc ci FNAFKITI NAI F �TIIMH r -i 00 Z cn 0 0rD Ral l mg go Hca_ r -i ITH I A A R I A 0 2- ;0V -r 1 1 r% 1 r-% 00 Z cn 0 0rD Ral l Hca_ ITH I A A R I A 0 2- ;0V -r 1 1 r% 1 r-% 2. W cn M; CD 0 z Rin CI FMFNTI HAI F �Tlln I ns I y m D D x � 0 m <<� qo 16 i 'er , / t L-1'- � ri I i , - --- - ....__... I I , - .._ GI El • jm� m o . gz�� z 5 �2 y m D D e � EIX459 w FI e N RIM PI FMFNTI NAI F .UllnIn.� - ---------------_ mo HN m o t i Fg . i l ` 11 i I. ,f j I.t r rr j ` \it CP 0 A d o N mz R I H Cl FMFNTI HALE STUDIOS 5 z � r s �--ill iil Ijl i H �^ I -III, III ! 111= I �Hi ="III -'III.: III =i 711::111 III. III" - !='-lil:.II6: 111 -II III -.11!'"111711; ,111-:11.1 III II I IIIIIIIIIiII�. '-'' ' Iil 1 IF -1 l 1' III - !II Ili - Ili- r lil-'Ij , illillil Ill.:;ill a o Z C a G) I n p w. cn "dn 9 p N 'A �{ RtlOkVI Il^InY N j; �f I a _..:. ! i! - nr� 5 z � r s �--ill iil Ijl i H �^ I -III, III ! 111= I �Hi ="III -'III.: III =i 711::111 III. III" - !='-lil:.II6: 111 -II III -.11!'"111711; ,111-:11.1 III II I IIIIIIIIIiII�. '-'' ' Iil 1 IF -1 l 1' III - !II Ili - Ili- r lil-'Ij , illillil Ill.:;ill a o Z C a G) n p w. cn "dn 9 p N 'A �{ RtlOkVI Il^InY N a - nr� tzn cam fetal Rin- r"i FNAFNTI NAI F UIInInS H uti 1;• 1 v— � o � 'llllillll�ll�l � �o Q lll! j ��III III ,.1111 IIIA �� I I Ii II SII_ i I I I�IIliillil�i I� 11 !1111 -- III I -111 " - jrI- I it ' .I III. -�.�' �`•'—• 'I I:I I --=f — l;Lli� ilk Jy. � II�IIII,iI ,.' ��I'lil I II 11 I�i JOT 1I ` IN �i ii. III .I• �� � II 1 !I111 ii III!I14 iIl �, "' .111:. I i - �1 D 1111 ihl I Z !11 III ot- �R S1 m H 5 t � m RIB PI FMFNTI NAI F STIInIOS t - It }t dr 1 All 1 IgN I t 1 All IgN t7� m -P m y+•�ii N N o_ CE NQ . RIB PI FMFNTI NAI F STIInIn.� 16 1 H 1 11111 w 1 ! 1 � I 0.r 0 Mimi 11-1 M Hill IT q 1.1 How 1 fi'0 53 IN3 BtiAM I ARF I In Jul :Mv 82: MUNI non! Ill Im log 1111 gill 1 wF v E IS q 4 -t UHURN MIA Eq 11 U111111 o HAN H " RION, RIGS rl FMFNTI HAI F STlinin.. HH -1 E Vii: e man gill I a Ito x ME Im log 1111 gill 1 wF v E IS q 4 -t UHURN MIA Eq 11 U111111 o HAN H " RION, RIGS rl FMFNTI HAI F STlinin.. HH -1 gill Im log 1111 gill 1 wF v E IS q 4 -t UHURN MIA Eq 11 U111111 o HAN H " RION, RIGS rl FMFNTI HAI F STlinin.. 14 IF: -9 -01102 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR - 21825 COPLEY DRIVE - DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 - TEL. (909) 839-7030 - FAX (909) 861-3117 FA M MEETING DATE: July 12, 2011 CASE/FILE NUMBER: Development Review No. PL 2010-354 PROJECT LOCATION: 841 Coldstream Court, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 (APN 8701-044-033) PROPERTY OWNERS: Chiou Y. Lin 841 Coldstream Court Diamond Bar, CA 91765 APPLICANT: Kevin Yang 9138 Olema Street Temple City, CA 91780 Property owner, Chiou Y. Lin, and applicant, Kevin Yang, are requesting approval of a Development Review application to add 728 square feet to the first floor of an existing 1,884 square -foot, two-story single-family residence. The existing architectural style of the structure is a 1980s tract home design with hipped roofs, concrete roof tiles, wood siding, stucco walls, and vinyl windows. The proposed addition will maintain the existing architectural style and is consistent with the development standards for the site and surrounding neighborhood. After evaluating the application, staff finds that the proposed Development Review proposal complies with the City's development standards and meets the findings required of the project. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review No. PL 2010-354, subject to the conditions of approval contained in the attached Resolution. A T1 M FJ1 TIT -7 -MM - I � In 1988, the property was developed under Los Angeles County standards with a 1,884 square -foot, two-story single-family residence on a 0.47 gross acre (20,651 square -foot) lot. There are no protected trees on site. The subject property is legally described as Lot 39 of Tract No. 42576, and the Assessor's Parcel Number (APN) is 8701-044-033. The proposed 728 square -foot, first -floor addition will consist of two new bedrooms, two bathrooms, and a nook to the south side of the dwelling. The existing height of the building is 26-9." The proposed height of the addition is 16'-7", measured from the finished grade to the highest point of the roofline. Development Review No. PL 2010-354 Page 2 of 6 i T , it ` TiL ode (DBM Section 22.440 I C M -C M Q%Tl Additions to structures and reconstruction projects which are equal to or greater than 50 percent of the existing habitable floor area of all existing structures on site, or projects having a substantial change require Planning Commission approval of a Development Review application. Approval of a Development Review application is required to ensure compliance with the City's General Plan policies, development standards and design guidelines, and to minimize adverse effects of the proposed project upon the surrounding properties and the City in general. Development Review No. PL 2010-354 . Page 3 of 6 h1- ,1(#F=[V1 The following table compares the proposed project with the City's development standards for residential development in the RL zone: Fri '3, V W The proposed addition is on an existing building pad and no grading is required. Elevations The existing architectural style of the structure is a 1980s tract home design with hipped roofs, concrete roof tiles, wood siding, stucco walls, and vinyl windows. The proposed addition will maintain the existing architectural style of the existing residence and will be consistent with the surrounding architecture of the neighborhood. Landscape plans are not required because the site is already developed, and because the project is exempt from the City's Water Conservation Landscaping Ordinance. The ordinance would only apply if 5,000 square feet or more of the existing landscaped area was being altered. However, landscaping that is damaged during construction will need to be restored upon project completion, and is included in the conditions.of approval. Development Review No. PL 2010-354 Page 4 of 6 t I a I YtV 'M1 I MeAd"01, gg., �.�.Y'LTi{rfE�: .. ., ��.. .. ,v.��ta��aMl�(SX..2Y ��'� -p"'ail.ifs"��`{W��{.y9,�,(�q�i�}3.,,�te.�,.y�f,+�"��k�.+15fj f . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..i`lYr TM 'HIS-eb" Mail il i 20' 301-9" 301-9" MOM - Yes 5'-0" on one side & 7'-9" - north side 7'-9" - north side 10'-0" on the other 64'-11 south side 47'-3" - south side Yes side. r tiw4n 15, 15'-0" - north side 15'-0" — north side�ee Yes N/A - south side N/A - south side V 7M j, ,W %N,All Q-0 I X - Rea Set 20' 821-51 78'-2" Yes @ Cs rag Maximum of 40% 7.8% 11.3% Yes log ,17 MUM @ fi - blK, .1 Of ffffl 351-31 0 N FINNS P314 121 % I'll , - I 261 -9" 26-9" Yes UN, IT g-in-Mar-Rifig SPIN 2 -car garage 2 -car garage 2 -car Yes garage Fri '3, V W The proposed addition is on an existing building pad and no grading is required. Elevations The existing architectural style of the structure is a 1980s tract home design with hipped roofs, concrete roof tiles, wood siding, stucco walls, and vinyl windows. The proposed addition will maintain the existing architectural style of the existing residence and will be consistent with the surrounding architecture of the neighborhood. Landscape plans are not required because the site is already developed, and because the project is exempt from the City's Water Conservation Landscaping Ordinance. The ordinance would only apply if 5,000 square feet or more of the existing landscaped area was being altered. However, landscaping that is damaged during construction will need to be restored upon project completion, and is included in the conditions.of approval. Development Review No. PL 2010-354 Page 4 of 6 M, MIM The project is designed to be compatible and complementary to the neighborhood, and incorporates the principles of the City's Residential Design Guidelines as follows: The proposed addition will conform to all development standards, including building height and setbacks, which is consistent with other homes in the neighborhood; G The proposed addition will be a single -story addition, and will not exceed the height of the existing building; The project is designed to minimize the negative impacts on surrounding homes. A transition between the project and adjacent properties is achieved through appropriate setbacks; The project is designed to be appropriate in mass and scale to the site and incorporates existing design elements; and Placement and relationship of windows, doors, and other window openings are carefully integrated with the building's overall design. Project Site Adjacent Property to West Adjacent Home to East Development Review No. PL 2010-354 Hage 5 OT 6 The Public Works Department and Building and Safety Division reviewed this project, and their comments are included in the attached resolution as conditions of approval. .NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: On July 1, 2011, public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 500- -foot radius of the project site and the notice was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers. A notice display board was posted at the site, and a copy of the notice was posted at the City's three designated community posting sites. Jar f'f At the time the staff report was published, staff had not received any comments from the public. �1111 7 01 This project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on that assessment, the City has determined the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to the provisions of Article 19 Section 15301(e) (additions to an existing structure of less than 10,000 square feet) of the CEQA Guidelines. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution (Attachment 1) approving Development Review No. PL 2010-354, to construct an addition of 728 square feet to an existing 1,884 square -foot single-family residence, based on the findings of DBIVIC Section 22.48, subject to conditions of approval as listed within the draft resolution. A . Attachments: 9MM3= Grace S. Lee Senior Planner 1. Draft Resolution Approving DR No. PL 2010-354 2. Photographs of Existing House 3. Site Plan,. Floor Plans, and Elevations Development Review No. PL 2010-354 Page 6 of 6 Attachment I 11, 0, ki, Le mly-'N 1111 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. PL 2010-354 TO ADD 728 SQUARE FEET TO AN EXISTING 1,8&� SQUARE -FOOT, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE ON A 0.47 GROSS ACRE (20,651 SQUARE -FOOT) LOT LOCATED AT 841 COLDSTREAM COURT DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 (APN 8701-044-033). A. RECITALS I The property owner, Chiou Y. Lin, and applicant, Kevin Yang, have filed an application for Development Review No. PL 2010-354 to add 728 square feet to thefirst floor of an existing 1,884 square -foot single family residence located at 841 Coldstream Court, City of Diamond Bar, County of Los Angeles, California. Hereinafter in this resolution, the subject Development Review shall collectively be referred to as the "Project." 2. The subject property is made up of one parcel totaling 20,651 square feet (0.47 gross acres). it is located in the Low Density Residential (RL) zone with an underlying General Plan land use designation of Rural Residential. 3. The legal description of the subject property is Tract 42576 Lot 39. The Assessor's Parcel Number is 8701-044-033. 4. On July 1, 2011, notification of the public hearing for this project was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers. Public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 500 -foot radius of the Project site and public notices were posted at the City's designated community posting sites on July 1, 2011. In addition to the published and mailed notices, the project site was posted with a display board and the notice was posted at three other locations. within the project vicinity. 5. On July 12, 2011, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing,, solicited testimony from all interested individuals, and concluded said hearing on that date. NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: 1. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct; and 2. The Planning Commission hereby determines the Project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to the provisions of Article 19, Section 15301 (e) (additions to an existing structure of less than 10,000 square feet) of the CEQA guidelines. Therefore, no further environmental review is required. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein and as prescribed under Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Section 22.48, this Planning Commission hereby finds as follows: Development Review Findings (DBMQ Section 22.48.040) The design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with the applicable elements of the City's General Plan, City Design Guidelines, and development standards of the applicable district, design guidelines, * . and architectural criteria for special areas (e.g., theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards or planned developments); The existing single-family residence is a permitted use in the RL zone. The proposed addition of 728 square feet to an existing 1,884 square -foot single- family residence complies with the De * velopment Standards of the Low Density Residential (RL) zoning district and is consistent with the applicable elements of the City's General Plan and City Design Guidelines. The project site is not part of any theme area, specific plan, community plan, boulevard or planned development. 2. The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards; The proposed addition will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments because the use of the project site has an existing single-family home and the surrounding uses are also single- family homes. 3. The architectural design of the. proposed development is compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain and enhance the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22.48: Development Review Standards, the City's Design Guidelines, the City's General Plan, or any applicable specific plan; The existing architectural style is a 1980s tract home design with hipped roofs, concrete roof tiles, wood siding, stucco walls, and vinyl windows. The proposed 2 DR No. PL 2010.354 addition will maintain the existing architectural style and is consistent with the development standards for the site and surrounding neighborhood. 4. The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, color, and will remain aesthetically appealing; The design of the proposed addition is sensitive to the scale and character of the neighborhood. Variation in the building elements has been achieved through the utilization of varying architectural features and building materials, such as, hipped roofs, concrete roof tiles, wood siding, stucco walls, and vinyl windows,. 5. The proposed development will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious (e.g., negative effect on property values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity; and Before the issuance of any City permits, the proposed project is required to comply with all conditions within the approved resolution, and the Building and Safety Division and Public Works Departments, and Los Angeles County Fire Department requirements. Through the permit and inspection process, the referenced agencies will ensure that the proposed project is not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. 6. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as set forth under Article 19 Section 15301 (e) (additions to an existing structure of less than 10,000 square feet) of the CEQA guidelines. Based upon the findings and conclusion set forth above, the Planning Commission hereby approves the proposed Project, subject to the following conditions and attached standard conditions: I Development shall substantially comply with the plans and documents presented to the Planning Commission at the public hearing; and 2. Standard Conditions. The applicant shall comply with the standard development conditions attached hereto. The Planning commission shall: a. certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and b. Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail to the property owner, Chiou Y. Lin, 841 Coldstream Court, Diamond Bar, 3 DR 140. PL 2010.354 CA 91765; and the applicant, Kevin Yang, 9138 Olema Street, Temple City, CA 91780. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12th DAY OF JULY 2011, BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. By: Jack Shah, Chairman 1, Greg Gubman, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing., Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of July, 2011, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners: None NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: None ABSTAIN: Commissioners: None ATTEST: Greg Gubman, Secretary I 4 DR No. PL 2010-354 1W - N 2 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE EPARTMN rig F,(-- � *-F USE PERMIT% COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL NEW AND REMODELED STRUCTURES PROJECT #: Development Revie j No. PL 201 1-q54 �C)Otz single - SUBJECT: fami y resi_dence, PROPERTY Chiou Y. Lin OWNER(S): 841 Coldstream Court Diamond Bar, CA 91765 APPLICANT: Kevin Yang 9138 Oldma Street Temple City, CA 91780 CA 917 LOCATION: old 841 �,strea ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECI APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION AT (909) 839-7030, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH- THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1 In accordance with Government Code Section 66474.9(b)(1), the applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, and its officers, agents and employees, from any claim, action, or proceeding to attack, set-aside, void or annul, the approval of Development Review No. PL 2010-354 brought within the time period provided by Government Code Section 66499.37. In the event the city and/or its officers, agents and employees are made a party of any such action: (a) Applicant shall provide a defense to the City defendants or at the City's option reimburse the City its costs of defense, including reasonable attorneys fees, incurred in defense of such claims. 5 DR No. PL 2010-354 (b) Applicant shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against the City defendants. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action of proceeding, and shall cooperate fully in the defense thereof. 2. This approval shall not be effective for any purpose until the applicant and owner of the property involved have filed, within twenty-one (21) days of approval of this Development Review No. PL 2010-354, at the City of Diamond Bar Community Development Department, their affidavit stating that they are aware of and agree to accept all the conditions of this approval. Further, this approval shall not be effective until the applicants pay remaining City processing fees, school fees and fees for the review of submitted reports. 3. All designers, architects, engineers, and contractors associated with this project shall obtain a Diamond Bar Business License; and a zoning approval for those businesses located in Diamond Bar. 4. Signed copies of Planning Commission Resolution No. 2011 -XX, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 5. Prior to the plan check, revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval. 6. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval shall be completed. 7. The project site shall be maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of approval and all laws, or other applicable regulations. 8. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and any applicable Specific Plan, in effect at the time of building permit issuance.. 9. All site, grading, landscape/irrigation, and roof plans, and elevation plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of City permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.,) or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 10. The property owner/applicant shall remove the public hearing notice board within three days of this project's approval. 11. The applicant shall comply with the requirernents of City Planning, Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works Department, and the Fire Department. 1. Applicant shall pay development fees (including but not limited to Planning, 6 DR No. PL 2010-354 Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works Department and Mitigation Monitoring) at the established rates, prior to issuance of building or grading permit (whichever comes first), as required by the City. School fees as required shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permit. In addition, the applicant shall pay all remaining prorated City project review and processing fees prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever comes first. 2. Prior to any plan check, all deposit accounts for the processing of this project shall have no deficits. C. TIME LIMITS I The approval of Development Review No. PL 2010-354 expires within two years from the date of approval if the use has not been exercised as defined per Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Section 22.66.050 (b)(1). The applicant may request in writing a one year time extension subject to DBMC 22.60.050(c) for Planning commission approval. D. SITE DEVELOPMENT 1 The project site shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the approved plans submitted to, approved, and amended herein by the Planning Commission, 'collectively attached hereto as Attachment 2 including: site plans, floor plans, and architectural elevations on file with the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 2. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, air conditioning condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berms, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Division. 3. All roof -mounted equipment shall be screened from public view. 4. All structures, including walls, trash enclosures, canopies, etc., shall be maintained in a structurally sound, safe manner with a clean, orderly appearance. All graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours by the property owners/occupant. 5. All landscaping, structures, architectural features and public improvements damaged during construction shall be repaired or replaced upon project completion. 7 DR No. PL 2010-354 1. The site shall be maintained in a condition, which is free of debris both during and after the construction, addition, or implementation of the entitlement approved herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether during or subsequent to construction shall be done only by the property owner, applicant or by a duly permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste from residential, commercial, construction, and industrial areas within the City. It shall be the applicant's obligation to insure that the waste contractor used has obtained permits from the City of Diamond Bar to provide such services. 2. Mandatory solid waste disposal services shall be provided by the City franchised waste hauler to all parcels/lots or uses affected by approval of this project. All 1 rklmnn�� 1. An Erosion Control Plan shall be submitted concurrently with the grading plan clearly detailing erosion control measures. These measures shall be implemented during construction. The erosion control plan shall conform to national Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards and incorporate the appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP's) as specified in the Storm Water BMP Certification. 2. The applicant shall comply with Standard Urban Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) requirements to the satisfactory of the City Engineer. 3. Grading and construction activities and the transportation of equipment and materials and operation of heavy grading equipment shall be limited to between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. Dust generated by grading and construction activities shall be reduced by watering the soil prior to and during the activities and in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 402 and Rule 403. Reclaimed water shall be used whenever possible. Additionally, all construction equipment shall be properly muffled to reduce noise levels. I The owner shall execute and record a covenant agreement.to maintain and hold the City harmless for all existing improvements in the public right-of-way. 2. The applicant shall submit drainage plans in accordance with "the City's requirements for the City's review and approval. Note that any grading in excess of 50CY total (Cut + fill) will require grading plan check and is subject to grading plan check conditions. 8 DR No. PL 2010-354 3. Finished slopes shall conform to City Code Section 22.22.080 -Grading. 4. All easements and flood hazard areas shall be clearly identified on the grading plan. 5. All equipment staging areas shall be located on the project site. Staging area, including material stockpile and equipment storage area, shall be enclosed within a 6 foot -high chain link fence. All access points in the defense shall be locked whenever the construction site is not supervised. MMEEMU� 1. Detailed drainage system information of the lot with careful attention to any flood hazard area shall be submitted. Ali drainage/runoff from the development shall be conveyed from the site to the natural drainage course. No on-site drainage shall be conveyed to adjacent parcels, unless that is the natural drainage course. I Underground utilities shall not be constructed within the drip line of any mature tree except as approved by a registered arborist. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 839-7020; FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Plans shall conform to State and Local Building Code (i.e., 2010 California Building Code, California Plumbing Code, California Mechanical Code, and the California Electrical Code) requirements and all other applicable construction codes, ordinances and regulations in effect at the time of plan check submittal. 2. The minimum design load for wind in this area is 95 M.P.H. exposures "C" and the site is within seismic zone D or E. The applicant shall submit drawings and calculations prepared by a California State licensed Architect/Engineer with wet stamp and signature. 3. This project shall comply with the energy conservation requirements of the State of California Energy Commission. All lighting shall be high efficacy or equivalent per the current California Energy Code. 4. This permit applies to a first floor addition only. All other improvements including site improvements are under separate permit. 5. Indicate all easements on the site plan. 6. The project s . hall be protected by a construction fence and shall comply with the NPDES & BMP requirements (sand bags, etc.) 9 DR No. PL 2010-354 7. Check drainage patterns with Engineering Department. Surface water shall drain away from building at a 2% minimum slope. 8. Specify location of tempered glass as required by code. 9. A soils letter or compaction report will be required to approve the foundation support --materials. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE PREVENTION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Emergency access shall be provided, maintaining free and clear, a minimum 28 foot at all times during construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. 2. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be submitted to the Fire Department that temporary water supply for fire protection is available pending completion of the required fire protection system. 3. All required fire hydrants shall be installed and tested and accepted prior to construction. Vehicular access must be provided and maintained serviceable throughout construction. END 10 DR No. PL 2010-354 Attachment 2 P F P P T P. P= -M �a E. - F -. ? d jw> T M T EC P -. 9. Z 1.0 6t, t. ". W V/ E ON K 3 Fs 5 P X Xfl E62 6 ir Z' Az cc E k i 'F ➢/fir, g i t - -.P'xEk F. T UPP P iT a P gg as I rp), jr 092 it rL'F sOfl %j < E g X -Z . Ml '.UH s = '2 12H I 34 A a g j. Er 'a q� 6'gag 6 Pis 4 gn 0, 771.1 0 -0 0 0 > > m M > I N 0 0 z 0 z Cr 0 OnM cnwwm M 0 0 1 -4 0 r- 0 z P;q m m U) V) m Cn O m m 0 0 > 0 za m En 0 'a > a: 0 0 a z m > U) 9 G) > T A z M m m En pq 0 < m 0 z 0 z 0 ;o 5E > G) M > F - z ftZ ft > 00 y 0 0 0 T + n + Z , 0 0 Z, a a U) CO >> ;o --I ;o , :t M it o 0 > 0 0 0 0 C M --A C ;U -A -n 3CD n is U) 5 Room Addition K C Yang Development, Inc. 841 Coldstream Court 9138 Olem St. Diamond Bar, CA91765 Temple City, CA 91780 II DA & P Room Addition N 841 Coldstream Court c Diamond Bar, CA91765 K C Yang Development, Inc. 9138Olema St. Temple City, CA 91780 I F iY pp d � N elV 6 n P�• fi x 0 6l9 6 � a r 12'-2�t�" - • 0.. 12'-2%?' ' i < u O O s - - H N O Z ED- -n TI57 O y' ttt 3 8 W x A II 0 3 9 h 8 o � 20'-6�2__—_— F i+i �i Rhe N 7�� a Z ':tkk o p n x m eucc x F Room Addition K C Yang Development, Inc. >e r 841 Coldstream Court 9138 Olema St. W b Diamond Bar, CA91785 Temple City, CA 91780 0 0 0 El 0 i VTT VE3 MEg f ® / m / / / Cn s M a � s \ m o ::3 \ G s" s I O 8 4.. Ig _,,gyp;.-- e c y a �p(415/i6 - a Room Addition K C Yang Development, Inc. �j•-•I 841 Coldstream Court _ 9138 Olema St. Diamond Bar, CA91765 Temple City, CA 91780 E 3 Li U) }� (D O Li Eo � 4 $ £ s s CD U) m e El CDC 1< 4z �» g s s s e - B as s" Room Addition 841 Coldstream Court K_C Yang Development,. Inc. 9138 Olema St. Diamond Bar, CA91765 Temple City, CA 91780 j ��°-:' LO I? 0 -j CL CD C() C-4 0 1 rro i ' ' Tc �-AY C: 0 0 CL C14 -j >� CL ry E a) n mis — 0 cli -i 0- ry n � � c ro c m c � c I C0 O c 0 c 0 0 0 0 N z w 0 CL) H ca m m m ca > 0 f.Y- (j) w Uj m 5� 0 -%t: > 0 0 1 z w (1) ry C, ) a o CD 0 > 40- 10 10 1 40- 4- 2 n o uj CL 00 2 2 CL: 1 '2 0 Cal)) —C 0 RB 0 CL U) a) 'm - (a a) U - 0) 0) 0) C: 0) 0) CD 0) z < > z JU C) 0 o tp (-) — c) _0 0) a) 0) C: a) ca M co cu (U cu it < t-- < U: fy Z CU -a CD (a cu 'a a) ca 0 Cy (D CY N 0 LL U) (1) (n z :3 Cl) E Z m .2 c) E E 1) E Lr) z () 0 U) Lo 3: "t 0 E 0 LO �: i 0 z o -0 0 o �o o (D o 1- 0 — 0 co > Cl) ca 3: C14 (1) 0 (Y a) 0 z z 0 < 0 (D Or- w a. C\l N cr co 0' -,4- cr ZI 0) Z Clq 0 0 C: 0 w z C) 0 0 . 2 . D -, IL 0 Z W CL cu CL ca CL CL (U a cu a (U CL CL (U CL CL cu CL 0 EL < C) Z II II II II a) (6D .2 a) —Q) .2 CL x ILIL < 0 CL (D N Fz IL CL E CL E CL E CL E CL EE CL CL E 0 0 0 0 8 C 0 C: 0 C: 0 0 0 0 4- 0 4- 0 0 CD a)o Q) a) a) r_ Z uj (D a) (D C O o — 0 . 0 0 C: 0 J2 —M 0 0 0 0 C: w cu cu m .2 E 3 cr-a .9 E ca ca .9 E -a ca ca L) E "C CL 0 0 0 0 CL 40- CL 40- < A CL 40- < Q. 40- < CL L� < (J. 4- < CL 4- < 9; U to 0 0 (D *V< 0 0 (D ca 0 o C: ui C: (D C: 0 cu :3 0 a) CL ca U- 0 ry m CL Z z I <0 0II ( SII zI.�?=;III(D z Q I z I O I z LO 0 C*4 IL 0 z LO I? 0 -j CL CD C() C-4 0 1 rro i 0 Z IL C', (L CL -J �-AY C: 0 0 CL C14 -j >� CL ry E a) n 0 o 04 -j IL ry — 0 cli -i 0- ry n a. 00 5 c () I 5; C) ry Ci IL LO — 0 IL IL 0) C) — 0 IL w co "t Co C) -j IL ry I 0 N CL) rn Uj m 5� > -%t: > C: C, ) a o CD 0 > E (D = P E E 'c� �wt w ] 2 n z 0 Lu 2 2 CL: 1 '2 0 Cal)) —C 0 RB 0 CL U) a) 'm - (a a) U - _CU cu 0 C: 1�: 0 C) 0 o tp (-) — c) _0 0) a) 0) C: a) 0 ry,: (D -0 CL M .2 C q ca CU -a CD (a cu 'a a) ca 0 Cy (D CY N 0 LL U) (1) (n z :3 Cl) E Z m .2 c) E E 1) E Lr) z () 0 U) Lo 3: "t 0 E 0 LO �: i 0 z o -0 0 o �o o (D o 1- 0 — 0 co > Cl) ca 3: C14 (1) 0 (Y a) 0 z z 0 < 0 (D Or- w a. C\l N cr co 0' -,4- cr ZI 0) Z Clq OD ce) F - z W CL w W 0 z Z w 0 :E CL 0 W LL > 0 w 5 0 U -0 -a -ca -a -M 75 -a -M -a F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 =a �o :E5 � :E5 a :E5 :E5 :E5 :E5 ca 'a (a "a co "a m -0 cri "a cu -o co -0 cu 'a cc "a m ca 0 4- 0 4- 0 4- 40- 0 4- 0 4- 0 4- 0 4- 0 4- 0 4- 0 4- 0) 0) 0) CD cm 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) C: r_ r_ C: C: r_ r_ r_ r_ C a -F, m ca (a cc m cu m ca cri ca 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CL c- CL CL ca. CL CL CL CL CL CL C) CLCL CL CL CL CL CL CL CL 0. w ca co w ca ca cu ca cu cu w a) 0 v a) (D a) a) a) a) a) (D CL 0. 0. CL CL CL CL 0 - EE �: E E E E E E �: E E E 0 o o 0 0 0 0 LD 0 0 0 0 0> 0 U> u 8 0 U> 0 0 Q C C@ r- r- C C: a r- C 1 43 0 0 0 0 l O 4- 16 15 to 16 (1) 0 a W (D c a) 0) a) (1) r_ a) a) a) 0 0 0 0 '= 0 *� 0 = 0 '= 0 *= 0 *= 0 = 0 t2 0 — 0 0 m ca co m m m w m m m w 0 m m cu .0 p "a .9 E "a�o .9 p — :9 — E -ao� .- E -a .- — g E -a CL - CC LL IL CL a CL CL 'o < c 0- < C: CL 'o < r_ COL 'o c 'o < c OL'o 0- < c CL L�o < c CL 40- < a 0-10 < a a 40- < C: �j% ca 0) 0) -C CL ca :3 C/) E 0 > 0 n (D cm c c x 0QLn 0 0 a) U - Fy w 0- cu ry (D 0 (D z 0 z 0 0 Cl Z 0 (D (0 C) co ce) N ry CN CL P- C? C? 00 0 C14 C) rl- 0 0 - (L ce) CD Njl C\l CN C) <-NN 0 CD 0 cq 0 N CL D a- CL -i CL IL IL -i -i C) C) (L IL D IL CL CL CL IL 6 D Z) 0 L) C (D 0 c a) 0 c a) E > tq (n (n E . =3 m 2 a) U) > > (D 0) m E U) .0 E E ca �o (n a) cn . a C 4m- o C: I 0 -o T CL -0 a) a) > > E cu a, u) -0 in - a. 0 7& 0E 0E Q. -1 M F a) (n �: a a) C: 0 M 0 4- 0 I.C-0 4C a) L Z 0 -J u F= 0-2 :2 co IE 0 0 c >22 E ca cr. c= ca cr, .0 —0 0 LL .4-5 0 T-0 =.a :3 2.0 - LO 2 U) 0 a) — _3 0 0 U) a) CL A2 z LO j-3 LO :!:! M'O — - :Ei — a -E5 co =3 0 2 E E `: 0 uj —.0 CO < C) N -0 m to -0 00,0 L" :s 0) C ) -) g L) ca z L) a) M Z --5 C\j -4 CL C\l — (N Cl) LO — U) D-- CL — C CITY OF DIAMOND BAR NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING AND AFF40AVII-OF P94JVJqv91 911;1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 1, Stella Marquez, declare as follows: On July12, 2011, the Diamond Bar Planning Commission will hold a regular session at 7:00 p.m., at the South Coast Quality Management District/Government Center Auditorium, 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California. Items for consideration are listed on the attached agenda. 1, Stella Marquez, declare as follows: I am employed by the City of Diamond Bar. On July 8, 2011, a copy of the agenda of the Regular Meeting of the Diamond Bar Planning Commission was posted at the following locations: South Coast Quality Management District Auditorium 21865 East Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Diamond Bar Library 1061 Grand Avenue Diamond Bar, CA Heritage Park 2900 Brea Canyon Road Diamond Bar, CA 91765 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on July 11, 2011, at Diamond Bar, California. Stella Marquez Community Development Department CD/ntelWaffidavitposting,doc Fii low q� ind is ready. dr