Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/08/2011IRAN I .G FILE COPY COMMISSION AGENDA February 8, 2011 7:00 P.M. ,South Coast Air Quality Management District Government.Center Building Auditorium 21865 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Chairman Tony Torng Commissioner KwangP Ho Lee' Commissioner Jimmy Lin Commissioner Steve Nelson Commissioner Jack Shah Copies ofstaff reports or other written documentation relating to. agenda items are on file in the Planning Division of,the Community Development Department, located at 21825 Copley Drive, and are available for public inspection., if you have questions` regarding an agenda item, please call (909) 839-7030 during regular business hours*. Written materials distributed to the Planning Commission within 72 hours'of the Planning Commission meeting are available for public inspection immediately upon distributionin the City Clerk's office at 21825 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California, during normal business hours. In an effort to comply with the requirements of Title 11 of the Americans with Disabilities. Act of 1990, the City of Diamond Bar requires that any person in need of any type of special equipment, assistance or accommodations) in order to communicate at a City public meeting must inform the Community Development Department at (909) 839-7030 a minimum of 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting. + j Please refrain from smoking, eating or The City of Diamond Bar. uses recycled paper drinking in the Auditorium and encourages you to-do the same . City of Diamond Bar Planning Commission MEETING RULES PUBLIC INPUT The meetings of the Diamond Bar Planning Commission are 'open to the public. A member of the public may address the Commission on the subject of one or more agenda items and/or other items of which are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Diamond Bar Planning Commission. A request to address the Commission should be submitted in writing at the public hearing, to the Secretary of the Commission. As a general. rule,. the opportunity for public ;comments will take place at the discretion of the Chair. However, in order to facilitate the meeting, persons who are. interested parties for an item may be requested to give their. presentation at the time the item is called on the calendar.. The Chair may limit individual public input to five minutes on. any item; or the Chair may limit the total amount of time allocated for public testimony based on the number of people requesting to speak and the business of the Commission. Individuals are requested to conduct themselves in a professional and businesslike manner. Comments and questions are welcome so that all points of view are considered prior to the. Commission making recommendations to the staff and City Council. In accordance with State Law (Brown Act), all matters to be acted on by the Commission must be posted at least 72 hours prior to the Commission meeting. In case of emergency or when a subject matter arises subsequent to the posting of the agenda, upon making certain findings, the Commission may act on item that is not on the posted agenda. INFORMATION RELATING TO AGENDAS AND -ACTIONS OF THE COMMISSION Agendas for Diamond Bar Planning Commission meetings are prepared by the Planning Division of the Community.Development Department. Agendas are available 72 hours prior to the meeting at City Hall and the public library, and may accessed by personal computer at the number below. Every meeting of the Planning Commission is recorded on cassette tapes and duplicate tapes are available for a nominal charge. ADA REQUIREMENTS' A cordless microphone is available for those persons with mobility impairments who cannot access the public speaking area. The service of the cordless. microphone and sign language interpreter services are available by giving notice at least three business days in advance of the 'meeting. Please., telephone (909) 839-7030 between 7:30 `a.m. and 5:30 p.m., Monday through Thursday, and 7:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Friday: HELPFUL PHONE NUMBERS Copies of Agenda, Rules of the Commission, Cassette Tapes. of Meetings (909) 839-7030 General Agendas (909) 839-7030. us email: info(a�ci.diamond-bar.ca. J. tom, RAFT MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 11, 2010 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Torng called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in the South Coast Air Quality Management District/Government Center Auditorium, 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Vice Chairman Nolan led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL; Present: Commissioners Kwang Ho Lee, Steve Nelson, Jack Shah, Vice Chairman; Kathy Nolan, .and Chairman Tony. Torng. Also present: Greg Gubman, Community Development Director; Brad Wohlenberg, Assistant City Attorney; Grace Lee, Senior: Planner; Natalie Tobon, Planning Technician; and Stella Marquez, Senior Administrative Assistant. 2. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: None 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: As Presented. 4. CONSENT CALENDAR: 4.1 Minutes of the Regular Meeting of December 14, 2010. C/Lee moved, C/Shah seconded, to approve the December 14, 2010, minutes as presented. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Lee, Nelson, Shah, VC/Nolan, Chair/Torng NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None 5. OLD BUSINESS: None 6. NEW BUSINESS: None 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 7A, Development Review No. PL 2010-296 =Under the authority of Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.48, the applicant requested approval for an addition of 1,566 square feet to an existing 1`,507 square foot single-family residence. The subject property is zoned Low Density Residential (RL) with 3T JANUARY 11, 2011 PAGE2. PLANNING COMMISSION a consistent underlying General Plan Land Use designation of Low Density Residential. PROJECT ADDRESS: 24201 High Knob Road Diamond Bar, CA 91765 PROPERTY OWNER: Kalathur and Anuradha Pattabiraman, 24201.High Knob Road Diamond Bar, CA 91765 PT/Tobin presented staff's report and recommended Planning Commission approval.of Development Review No. PL 2010-296, based on the findings of fact, and.subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. There were no ex parte disclosures. Chair/Torng opened the public hearing. Kalathur Pattabiraman said he and his family have lived in Diamond Bar for 20 years and wish to .make their current home their final home by improving the property and asked for Commission approval. Mr. Pattabiraman responded to Chair/Torng that he read staff's report and concurred with the conditions of approval. 'Chair/Torng closed the public hearing. VC/Nolan thanked the applicant for choosing to remain in Diamond Bar and said she was pleased to see this type of request before the Commission for consideration. VC/Nolan moved,C/Shah seconded, to approve Development Review No. PL 2010-296, ,based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Lee, Nelson, Shah, VC/Nolan, Chair/Torng NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS -.None DRAFT JANUARY 11, 2011 PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION 7.2 Time Extension for Conditional Use Permit No..2007-10 and Development Review No. 2006-11 — Torecommend approval to the City Council for a one-year time extension for a nine -unit residential condominium project on a 0.62 acre lot. Under the authority of Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.66.050, the applicant submitted a request for a one-year extension of time to begin construction. The project site is zoned High Density Residential -Planned Development Overlay (RH-PD) with a consistent underlying General Plan land use designation. The project was approved on November 20, 2007, with a three (3) year timeframe to obtain building permits and begin construction. PROJECT ADDRESS: 23671 Golden Springs Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 PROPERTY OWNER: GSDB Investment Group LLC 625 Fair Oaks Avenue #115 South Pasadena, CA 91030 APPLICANT: Joseph Kwok 625 Fair Oaks Avenue #115 South Pasadena, CA 91030 PT/Tobin presented staff's report and recommended the Planning Commission recommend approval to the City Council of the time extension for Conditional Use Permit `. No. 2007-10 and Development Review No. 2006-11 based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of "approval as listed within the draft resolution. There were no ex parte disclosures. Chair/Torng opened the public hearing. Joseph Kwok, applicant, said that as a result of drainage requirements imposed by the City's Public Works Department, the property owner is working with the contiguous homeowners association to resolve those issues and need the time extended to resolve those issues. C/Shah asked what kind of drainage issues the applicant was dealing with and what kind of time was needed to resolve those issues. Mr.. Kwok responded that originallythe Public .Works Department hoped, that the applicant could drain the surface water naturally through the condominium complex next door to their project but the applicant has not been able to get the board to agree to meet with them todiscuss the possibility with their RAFT JANUARY 11, 2011 PAGE 4 PLANNING COMMISSION homeowners. There is an alternative proposal to get the surface water drained from the site via a sump pump so that if the contiguous association board does not agree to the first option, the applicant will move forward with the alternative plana Since the applicant has pursued the association's board for the past two, years his firm has decided to move forward to get an agreement from the Public Works Department to cease further attempts to get the board's approval and move to the alternate proposal by the end of January 2011. Chair/Torng closed the public hearing. VC/Nolan moved, C/Nelson seconded, to recommend City Council approval of a one-year time extension for Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-10 and Development Review No. 2006-11, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Lee, Nelson, Shah, VC/Nolan, Chair/Torng NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None 7.3 Development Review, Tentative Tract Map, Variance, Parking Permit, and Comprehensive Sign Program No. PL 2010-163 — The applicant requested to construct a 36,142 square foot new three-story professional office building on a 41,110 square foot (0.94 acre), Community Commercial (C-2) zoned parcel with an underlying General Plan Land Use designation of General Commercial (GC). A Tentative Tract Map is requested to subdivide air space for a 30 -unit office condominium; a Variance is requested to increase the building height from 35 feet to 39 feet; a Parking Permit is requested to share access and parking between the proposed development and Diamond Hills Plaza, the existing shopping center, and a. Comprehensive Sign Program is requested for the signage on the building. PROPERTY ADDRESS: 2705 Diamond Bar Boulevard Diamond Bar, CA 91765 PROPERTY OWNER: Country Hills Holdings, LLC 8115 Preston Road #400 Dallas, TX 75225: R A - T JANUARY 11, 2011 PAGE 5 PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANT: THL Investments, LLC 17528 Rowland City of Industry, CA 91748 SP/Lee presented staffs report and recommended the Planning Commission adopt the resolution recommending City Council approval of Development Review, Tentative Tract Map, Variance, Parking Permit, and Comprehensive Sign Program No. PL 2010-163, based on the findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. C/Shah asked if trees would beadded on the street side of the building and SP/Lee said there were no trees proposed within the 10 foot setback. There is limited space providing room for a walkway and shrubs and vines in the area. There are no existing. trees in the.setback area, only existing.trees along Fountain Springs Road (six trees) which will be retained prior to and. after construction. C/Lee asked why the setback is being reduced from the usual 15 feet to 10 feet and SP/Lee said that applicant was proposing a larger building and in order to fit in the number of required parking spaces and maximize the parking spaces within the property the minimum requirement was 10 feet. C/Nelson, asked if the six trees on Fountain' Springs Road were on. City property and SP/Lee responded no, that they were :on the applicant's property. C/Nelson asked what the City's remedy would be if the trees had to be removed to accommodate the property. SP/Lee referred C%Nelson to Condition 3, Page - 11. There is no 'specific 'condition that specifically prohibits removal., If the applicant wished to remove any or all of the trees they would have to review the condition with staff to determine whether removal was allowed. C/Nelson said he was concerned that the trees should remain in place and be certain that the neighbors were informed if for some unforeseen reason, they would have to be removed because it would Significantly increase the massing and reduce the screening from the back yards across Fountain Springs Road. CD/Gubman proposed including a condition to read that should applicant need or request removal of the trees that it would require that they obtain a permit from the City for removal and with that permit, the City would require a certain ratio of replacements to help ameliorate the'visual impacts the current stand of trees would provide. C/Nelson felt that contrary to staff's statement that the line of site from the third story of the proposed building would be less intrusive than.itwould be from the second story because in his opinion; it was a little bit more intrusive but not significantly intrusive. PAGE 6 C/Nelson said he appreciated that the applicant provided the cross-sections because the applicant has, as indicated during the workshop, demonstrated that the proposed improvement will not be significantly more intrusive than the,existing improvement. He asked if there was a balcony on the third floor or if it had been eliminated and SP/Lee responded that the third floor balcony had been eliminated. However, there are access ways for maintenance purposes only with no public access. VC/Nolan asked if there was a point at which the parking would be so large - that it would be subdivided.to accommodate certain other businesses in the center. SP/Lee said there was no particular formula for areas within the shopping center. It is based on an aggregate of shared parking. VC/Nolan asked if the proposed parking for this building would offer a reasonable walking distance to other businesses within the shopping center. SP/Lee explained that there is currently less activity on the north side of the shopping center and there are not many parking space utilized in that area so staff would not anticipate a problem with the new three-story building. CDD/Gubman said that C/Nelson's observation regarding line of site was a good observation. The vantage point starts at a higher elevation at the tree than it did for the two story building because the downward site line is at a steeper angle for the three story building than it is for the two-story building. What the applicant is attempting to show is that the third floor parapet which would have been the railing for the balcony effectively cuts off the view angle when one is looking down. With respect to .parking, where the former theater was located, the new multi -space building includes a large parking area that is essentially vacant and unused. . Staff hopes the new development produces a little parking congestion to help the other retail buildingsand, businesses, and staff is very comfortable there will be no adverse parking issues due to the current inventory of underutilized parking. C/Shah said his opinion was that people in the building would. be able to look:, into the back yards of the homes across Fountain Springs Road. There were no ex parte disclosures. Chair/Torng opened the public, hearing. Peichin Lee, project developer and Diamond Bar resident said she was present to answer any questions the Commission might; have .and thanked them, for giving her the opportunity to move forward :with 'the' proposed project. She responded to Chair/Torng that she reviewed staff's report and 'DRAFT JANUARY 11, 2011 PAGE 7 PLANNING COMMISSION concurs with staffs recommendations including the most recent condition discussed this evening involving possible tree mitigation. Christopher Chung; 21470 Cold Spring Lane, felt, the proposed use was compatible with the shopping center and would be a great addition and provide synergy to the northern end of the center. He is amazed that the City is able to attract a qualified developer who is able to get the financing to produce this type of development during these difficult economic times. He believes- the project has been thoroughly vetted and supports the project. Chair/Torng closed the public hearing. C/Lee said he was in support of the project and stressed that the condition regarding the trees should be maintained to minimize the impacts to the street and to the residence on the opposite side of Fountain ,Springs Road. C/Shah moved, C/Lee seconded, to adopt the resolution recommending City Council approval of Development Review, Tentative Tract Map, Variance, Parking Permit, and Comprehensive Sign Program No. PL 2010-163, based on the findings of Fact,. and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the resolution, with. the addition of the _condition regarding tree. mitigation as recommended by staff. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Lee, Nelson, Shah, VC/Nolan,` Chair/Tomg NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:: None 8. PLANNING COMMISSIONER COMMENTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: C/Nelson said that in all of his years serving on and dealing with Planning Commissions he did not believe he had ever experienced a Planning Commission that worked together as well as this Planning Commission. Congratulations to all.of his colleagues and to staff; and Happy New Year to all. C/Shah said he concurred with .0/Nelson and thanked staff for their expertise. He wished everyone a prosperous New Year. VC/Nolan announced that she would be resigning from the Planning Commission. She and her husband Dan have sold their Diamond Bar home and are moving away from the City. This is a bittersweet change for them .and since their, children have moved on it is time for them to do so as.well. She thanked staff for their exhaustive JANUARY 11, 2011 PAGE 8 PLANNING COMMISSION help to the. Commission and thanked her colleagues and M/Tye for their support and said it had been apleasure'to serve the City: C/Lee wished everyone a Happy New Year. He wished VC/Nolan well in her future ventures. C/Nelson said he and his colleagues would miss VC/Nolan. Her perspective on this Commission has. been greatly appreciated and he thanked her for her contributions. C/Shah said he would miss VC/Nolan, a great friend and colleague. Chair/Torng said it was an honor to work with everyone and said he would miss VC/Nolan: The Planning Commission is a great group and it is wonderful to have staff's support. 9. STAFF COMMENTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 10.1 Public Hearing dates for future projects. CDD/Gubman said staff learned of VC/Nolan's resignation earlier today and are sorry to have her leave. He thanked C/Nelson for his comments. CDD/Gubman has been in this line of work for 21 years and this Commission is the most enjoyable group to work with in his years of service to four different cities. It his privilege to serve as the Commission's staff and it means a lotto him to hear such kind words. CDD/Gubman stated that the January 25 Planning Commission meeting would be canceled due to lack of agenda items and other staff business including conducting the City's biennial homeless count to get a sense of the homeless population and where to allocate the homeless services. When the homeless count was taken in 2009 it was scheduled for a Thursday evening from 8:00 p.m. until midnight and no homeless persons were found in the City. With the current economic climate, it will be interesting to find out what changes in the..upcoming homeless count. CDD/Gubman announced that the Winter Snowfest would be held on Saturday, January 15 and if Commissioners are attending they are asked to come to the stage area at 11:00 a.m. for the welcome speech. Planners Institute is scheduled for March 9-11,2011. Commissioners who wish to attend are asked to advise staff by February 1. CDD/Gubman asked Commissioners who no longer, needed the three-story office building plans to please return them to staff to recycle and use for the upcoming Council hearings in an'effort to reduce 'reproduction costs: DRAFT. JANUARY 11, 2011 PAGE 9 PLANNING COMMISSION CDD/Gubman stated that with respect to the new City Hall location, the conceptual design phase is complete and staff is moving into, the construction documents phase. The process is moving forward as planned and staff intends to move the operation to the new location by the end of 2011. Further, it likely that most of the Planning Commission meetings will be held in the new building except when there are large projects and larger audience participation is anticipated. He wished everyone a Happy New. Year. FF"I"'LANNING COMMISSION ............ AGENDA REPORT CITY OF DIAMOND BAR - 21825 COPLEY DRIVE - DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 TEL. (909) 839-7030 - FAX (909) 861-3117 AGENDA ITEM NO, 8.1 MEETING DATE: February 8, 2011 CASE/FILE NUMBER: Conditional Use Permit and Development Review No. PL 2010-253 PROJECT LOCATION: 24495 Eastgate Drive (Los Angeles County Assessor's Parcel Number 8701-006-900) APPLICATION REQUEST: To relocate; existing cellular antennas. on : a water tank to a ` new ' 35 -foot high artificial broadleaf tree within the property„ and upgrade associated equipment. The subject site is zoned Low Density `Residential: (RL) with, a consistent underlying General Plan :land use designation of Water. PROPERTY. OWNER:. Cregg Zimmerman Walnut.Valley Water. District 217 S. Brea Canyon Road Walnut, CA 91789 - APPLICANT. Thomas Mundl T -Mobile . 1.594 N. Batavia Street Orange, CA 92867 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: .Approve subject to conditions. BACKGROUND. Thei project site is owned by the ,Walnut Valley Water District (WVWD), and is the location of the E8istgate Reservoir near Pantera Park. On October 28, 1999, T -Mobile was approved to install cellular antennas on the smaller of the two water tanks at the facility. There are presently three existing freestanding wireless telecommunications facilities in operation on the subject property for other wireless service providers, which are listed below. Sprint PCS was approved on September 30, 2003, to install a 37 -foot broadleaf tree; Cingular Wireless (now AT&T) was approved on January 10, 2005, to install a 38'-6" broadleaf tree; and ® Verizon Wireless was approved on January 29, 2009 to install a 35 -foot broadleaf tree. The service road leading to the Eastgate Reservoir belongs to the City of Diamond Bar. On June 6, 2000, an easement agreement in the amount of $3,000.00 annually was approved by the City Council for Pacific Bell—now T-Mobile—to utilize the City -owned service road for utilities and access to the Eastgate Reservoir site. Project Descril2ti®ro On October 7, 2010, the WVWD instructed T -Mobile to remove the cellular antennas from the water tank in order to refurbish and make seismic upgrades to the existing water tanks. Hence, T -Mobile submitted plans to the City to relocate the antennas to a new broadleaf tree within the property. The proposed relocation consists of a new 35 -foot high broadleaf tree with a six-foot high wrought iron enclosure and upgrades to the existing equipment. The equipment will remain in its current location, enclosed with an existing chain-link fence. - T -Mobile cannot co -locate on existing freestanding wireless facilities because there would not be sufficient vertical separation between carriers' antennas to avoid interference. It is standard` for a 10 -foot separation between antenna centerlines of different carriers. In order for T -Mobile to achieve its coverage, objective, a centerline height of 28 feet (or its current height of 27 feet) would provide the best antennae separation. The existing co -location sites would physically obstruct T -Mobile's signal by the existing trees to the south. Therefore, 'a location' farther downhill is most suitable for T -Mobile's relocation. Page 2 of 8 OASTAFF REPORTS-PMEASTGATE 24495 -T -MOBILE PL 2010251DOC South Planning Area 2 Specific Plan RL —RL Open Space East Planning Area 2 Specific Plan Open Space West. Planning Area 2 Specific Plan j�--- RL Open Space Pantera Park Cf evelopmenf - DBM.Gl Sfandards 22 42.130 Euistmg I Proposed Feature Setbacks Antenna: Distance equal to height of 275' - 247'-5" Yes , antenna plus 20%from ' 4 , nearest residential lot line; , Equipment Building: 250' 250' Yes :x 20' to ROW line. To Equipment : To Equipment Height 35'-0" 33' 35' Yes Equipment Building: 0 ;, 0' 13 feet Existing 7' Chain Link Yes T Chain Link Fence Fence.to Remain Screening ' ' Screen or camouflage to Antenna is designed_ mitigate visual impacts. Antennas on water to appear as a Yes tank broadleaf tree. Architectural Equipment is Existing equipment to Irftegfat�an Integrate with design and enclosed by chain remain enclosed by Yes :.: color link fence , ' chain link fence Undergrountl All utilities and connection' All cables are All cables to be U�tilit�es ;_ cables must be placed underground underground Yes underground fighting k Artificial lighting shall be F limited to mandato safety mandatory y None None Yes f lt. and security Co Location ` ra `' Applicant.and Property. Not designed for Designed for future Yes owner must consent to future co -location co -location co -locations) Landscape Landscaping may be Antenna is designed required for screening Not required to appear as a Yes purposes broadleaf tree , ;Meets Requirements, New six-foot .high wrought iron enclosure around the broadleaf tree with 15. gallon Texas Privet Shrubs; and Upgrades to some of the existing equipment. Staff recommends a condition of approval to require the proposed ' antennas to be painted to blend in with the new broadleaf tree.. In addition, staff also recommends that the proposed wrought iron fence enclosure be painted green to match the existing vegetation. Facility Operational Characteristics The proposed wireless telecommunications facility operates 24 hours a day, seven days a week, with routine maintenance visits: FCC Guidelines FCC documentation is required for this project and is a condition of approval. These types of telecommunication projects are, generally categorically exempt from the California .Environmental Quality Act because the FCC licensing process. already incorporated an environmental finding for all telecommunications facilities to be developed under the wireless provider's FCC license. The Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 forbids local governments from denying or regulating wireless telecommunications facilities on the basis of health concerns. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) licenses and regulates wireless telecommunications facilities, and establishes safety thresholds for radio frequency (RF) emissions. Because wireless telecommunications facilities are regulated by the FCC, local agencies arepreempted considering perceived health effects in land use decisions for such facilities: Compatibility with Neighborhood. The proposed project complies with the goals and objectives as set forth in the adopted General Plan in terms of land use. The project will not negatively affect the existing surrounding land uses, and the design and appearance of the proposed structure is compatible with the surrounding area for the following reasons: The proposed relocation of the cellular antennaswill conform with all development standards, including height and setbacks; Walnut Valley Water District's Eastgate Reservoir is identified on the City's Telecommunications' Facilities' Opportunities Map as an acceptable location for a cell site; Page :6 of 8 O:\SrgFF REPORTS-PC\EASTGATE 24495- T -MOBILE PL 2010-253.DOC findings of DBMC Section 22.48 and 22.58, subject to conditions of approval as listed 2. The Planning Commission hereby determines the Project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of the California. Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). pursuant to the provisions of Article 19, Section 15303 (new construction.of, small structure) of the CEQA Guidelines. Therefore, no further environmental review is required C. FINDINGS OF FACT Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein and as prescribed under Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Section 22.58, 22.48, and 22.42.130, *this Planning Commission hereby finds as follows: Conditional Use Permit Findings (DBMC Section 22.58) 1. The proposed use is allowed within the subject zoning district with the approval of a conditional use permit and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Development Code and the Municipal Code; Pursuant to Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Section 22.08.030 Table 2-3, wireless telecommunication facilities are allowed in the RL zoning district. Additionally, this location is identified on the City's Telecommunications Facilities Opportunities Map. The proposed 35 -foot high broadleaf tree wireless facility complies with the development standards for wireless telecommunications facilities. 2. The proposed use is consistent with the general plan and any applicable specific plan; The proposed project entails the removal of existing cellular antennas on a water tank and relocates the antennas to 'a new broadleaf tree within the property already developed with three existing wireless telecommunication facilities. The relocation of the antennas. will not interfere with wireless coverage to subscribers in the area, nor will it create traffic or pedestrian hazards. As a result, staff finds the proposed project is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood since there are three existing cellular sites on the property. The site is also not subject to the provisions of any specific plan: 3 The design, location, size and.operating. characteristics of the proposed use are compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity; The freestanding antenna support structure is designed to be consistent with the three other antennas on the site and blends in with the surrounding frees and vegetation. The ground equipment is existing, which will have minor upgrades, thus will not affect the existing location.. The reservoir site is a 3.7 gross -acre site developed with two above -ground municipal water storage tanks and three existing telecommunications facilities. The existing and proposed facility is; unmanned and operates 24 hours a day, ,2 -XX Planning Commission Resolution No. 2011 seven days a week, with monthly routine maintenance. > As such, the operational characteristics are compatible with the existing and future land use in the vicinity. 4. The. subject site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of use being proposed including access; provision of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and the absence of physical constraints; The proposed wireless telecommunications facility's location is consistent with the City's Telecommunications Facilities Opportunities Map, which identifies public 'facilities as a location for this type of use. As referenced above, the project site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of use being proposed including access; provision of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses; and the absence of physical constraints. Since the antennas are being removed and relocated within the site, the intensity of the use will remain. 5. Granting the conditional use permit will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience; and zoning district in Which the property is located; and ' Before the issuance of any City permits, the proposed project is required to comply with all conditions within the approved resolution, and the Building and Safety Division and. Public Works Departments, and Los Angeles County Fire Department requirements. The referenced agencies through the permit and inspection process will ensure that the proposed project is not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. " 6. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as set forth under Article 19 Section 15303 (new construction of small structure) of the CEQA Guidelines: Development. Review (DBMC Section 22.48) 1. The design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with the applicable:elementsof the City's General Plan, City Design. Guidelines, and development standards of ...the applicable district, ,.design guidelines, :and architectural criteria for special areas (e.g., theme areas, specific plans: community plans,: boulevards or planned developments); As discussed above in item 2 of the: Conditional Use Permit FindingsofFact, the. design and layout of the Project is consistent with the General Plan, development standards of the applicable district, design guidelines; and architectural criteria for specialized areas (e.g., theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards, orplanned developments.) .3 Planning Commission Resolution No 2011-XX 2. The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future development and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards; As discussed above in items 2 and 3 of the. Conditional Use Permit Findings of Fact, the design and layout of the Project will not interfere withthe use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future development, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. 3. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain the harmonious, orderly and attractive, development contemplated by Chapter 22.48.20. Development Review Standards, City Design Guidelines, the City's' General Plan, or any applicable specific plan; As discussed above in items 1 through 4 of the Conditional Use Permit Findings of Fact, the architectural design of the Project is compatible with the characteristics of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22.48 Diamond Bar Development Code, the General Plan, City Design Guidelines, or any applicable specific plan. 4. The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for. its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, and color that will remain aesthetically appealing and will retain a reasonably adequate level of maintenance; As discussed above in Items 3 and 4 of the Conditional Use Permit Findings of Fact, the design of the Project will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public, as well as its neighbors, through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, and color that will remain aesthetically appealing. 5. The proposed development will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious (e.g., negative affect on property values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity; As discussed above in Item 4 of the Conditional Use -Permit Findings of Fact, prior to the issuance of any City permits, the proposed project is required to comply with all conditions within the approved resolution, and the Building and Safety Division and Public Works Departments, and Los Angeles County. Fire_ Department requirements. The referenced agencies through the permit and inspection process will ensure that the proposed project is not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements,in the vicinity. Wireless Facilities (DBMC Section 22.42.130) 1. Environmental integration. To the extent which the proposed facility blends into the surrounding environment and is architecturally integrated into .a concealing. structure, taking into consideration alternative sites that are available. Y �4 Planning Commission Resolution No.'2011-XX The Project integrates the antennas onto a new freestanding structure disguised as a broadleaf tree so as to blend in well .with the existing vegetation and three existing wireless facilities on the property. The proposed design for the site is the least intrusive on the community values as prescribed by the General Plan and Diamond Bar Development Code. 2. Screening: To the extent which the proposed facility is screened or camouflaged by existing or proposed topography, vegetation, buildings or other structures. Camouflaging is provided by disguising the antenna facility as a broadleaf tree to match the existingvegetation and existing wireless facilities on the site. The equipment area will remain existing, thus, no screening shall be provided. 3. Size. The total size of the proposed facility, particularly in relation to surrounding and ,supporting structures. The proposed relocation of the antennas to a new broadleaf free is appropriate in size and scale to the context, setting and similar to the existing wireless facilities on the property. The proposed six-foot high wrought iron enclosure is conditioned to be painted green to blend in with the vegetation and planted with shrubs. 4. Residential proximity. Proximity of the proposed facility to residential structures and to the boundaries of residential districts. The proposed relocation of the telecommunications facility is approximately 245 feet from the nearest residences, which is a sufficient distance to effectively buffer it from view. 5'. Access. Proposed ingress to and egress from the 'site of the proposed facility.. The proposed project will have access from the access road which extends off of Eastgate' Drive.` On June '6, 2000 an easement agreement in the amount of $3,000.00 annually, was approved by the City Council forPa`c Bell, now T -Mobile, . to utilize the City -owned service road for utilities and access to the site.; 6. Location. The location of the proposed facility and the extent to which it conforms to the following in order of preferences,— co -location or located at a pre -approved .:location, attached to existing structure such as building, communication tower, church,steeple or utility'pole or, tower; and located in.industrial, business park or commercial zoning districts. Currently, T -Mobile has its antennas affixed to the water tank. However, Walnut Valley Water District. has instructed T-Mobile'to remove the antennas from the water tanks and relocate. within the property due to refurbishment and seismic upgrades to the.'water tanks. The': three existing telecommunications facilities located on the site,,while,equipped for co -location, do not permit the new antennaas . to: meet the'height requirements necessary;to provide adequate coverage for the 5 Planning Commission Resolution No..2011-XX area. Therefore, the telecommunications antennas will be attached to a new 35 foot high freestanding structure disguised as a broadleaf tree. ®. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Based on the findings and conclusions set forth above, the Planning Commission hereby approves.the proposed project subject to the following conditions and the attached standard conditions: ' - 1. All antennas, structural components and other apparatus attached to the broadleaf tree, shall be painted and maintained dark green to match the leafs and shall be a noncorrosive nonmetallic finish that is conducive to reflection or glare. 2. The proposed wrought iron fence shall be painted green to blend in with the existing vegetation. 3. The project shall substantially conform to Title Sheet, Site Plan, Antenna and Layout Plan, Elevations, Landscape Plan, and Details as submitted to, amended herein, and approved by the Planning Commission. 4. Applicant shall comply with all Federal, State and City regulations. 5.. To ensure compliance with all conditions of approval and applicable codes, the Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to period review. If non-compliance with conditions of approval occurs, the Planning Commission may review the Conditional Use Permit. The Commission may revoke or modify the Conditional Use Permit. 6. When an emergency generator is used on site, the noise level of the generator :shall comply with the City's noise standards in Development Code Chapter 22.28. 7. Applicant shall ensure that the property is properly secured to prevent unauthorized access to the telecommunications facilities. 8. Signs and advertising shall be prohibited on -the antenna array. 9. No lighting shall be installed on the wireless antennas or associated equipment. 10. The site. shall be maintained in a condition free of trash; debris, refuse, and undesirable vegetation. All graffiti must be removed within 24 hours. In the event that the applicant does not remove all graffiti from the said structure, the city will remove all graffiti and shall be reimbursed for all. expenses.' In the event that the antenna becomes inoperable or ceases to be used for a period of six consecutive months, . the applicant shall remove the . telecommunications facility within 00 -days of notification by the City.,. . 12. All'cables and wiring, for the telecommunications facility.shall be underground. 6 Planning Commission Resolution No.'2011-XX /.�C1 I l 1 l COMMUNITY .DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ®®RTMoNT �4coxwxn�� STANDARDCONDITIONS USE PERMITS, COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL NEW AND REMODELED STRUCTURES PROJECT #: Conditional Use Permit and Development Review. No. PL 2010-253 SUBJECT: New 35 -Foot High Wireless Telecommunications Facility APPLICANT: T -Mobile LOCATION: 24495 EastgateDrive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION AT (909) 839-7030, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1 In accordance with Government Code Section 66474.9(b) (1), the applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, and its officers, agents and employees, from any claim, action, or proceeding to attack, set-aside, void or annul, the approval of. Conditional Use Permit and Development Review No. PL 2010-253 brought within the time period provided by Government Code Section 66499.37. In the event the city and/or its officers, agents and employees are made a party of any such action: (a) Applicant shall provide a defense to the City defendants or at the City's option reimburse the City its costs of defense, including reasonable attorneys fees, incurred in defense of such claims. (b). Applicant shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against the City descendents. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action of proceeding, and shall cooperate fully in the defense thereof. 2. This approval shall not be effective for any purpose until the applicant and owner of the property, involved have filed, within twenty-one (21) days of approval of this Conditional Use Permit and Development Review No. PL 2010-253,' at the City of 8. Planning commission Resolution No. 2011, -XX Diamond Bar Community Development Department, their affidavit stating that they are aware of and agree to accept all the conditions of this approval. Further, this approval shall not be effective until the applicants pay remaining City processing fees, school fees and fees for the review of submitted reports. 3. All designers, architects, engineers, and contractors associated with this project shall obtain a. Diamond Bar Business License and zoning approval for those businesses located in. Diamond Bar. 4. Signed copies of the Planning Commission Resolution No.' 2011 -XX, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to . all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wetsealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect: 5.1 Prior to the plan check, revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval 6. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval shall be completed. 7. The project site shall be maintained and operated in full compliance with. the conditions of approval and all laws, or other applicable regulations. 8:. Approval of. this request shall. not waive compliance with all sections. of the Development Code, all other applicable City' Ordinances; and any applicable Specific Plan in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 9.. All site, grading, and elevation plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of City permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment,: building, etc.,) or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 10. Applicant shall remove the public hearing notice board within three days of this project's approval. 11; The applicant shall comply with the requirements of City Planning, Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works Department, and the Fire Department. B. FEES/DEPOSITS 1. Applicant shall pay development fees (including but not limited to. Planning, ' Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works Department and Mitigation Monitoring) at the established rates, prior to issuance of building or grading permit (whichever. comes first), as required by.the City. School fees as required shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permit. In addition, the applicant shall pay all. remaining prorated City project review and processing fees prior to issuance of. goading or building permit, whichever come first: 9 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2011.XX 2. Prior to any plan, check, all deposit accounts for the processing of this project shall have no deficits: C. TIME LIMITS 1. The approval of Conditional. Use Permit and Development Review No PL 2010- 253 shall expire within two years from the date of approval if the use has not been exercised as defined in accordance to Municipal Code Section 22.66.050 (b)(1): The applicant may request in writing a one year time extension subject to Municipal Code Section 22.60.050(c) for Planning Commission approval. D. SITE DEVELOPMENT 1. The project site shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the approved plans submitted to, approved, and amended herein by the Planning Commission, collectively labeled and referenced herein as Exhibit "A" including: site plans, floor plans, architectural elevations, and landscape plans on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein and Development Code regulations. 2. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, air conditioning condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the, use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berms, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Division. 3. All structures, including walls, shall be maintained in a structurally sound, safe manner with a clean, orderly appearance. All graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours by the property owner/occupant. F. SOLID WASTE 1. The site shall be maintained in a condition, which is free of debris both during and after the construction, addition, or implementation of .the entitlement approved herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether during or subsequent to construction shall be done only by the property owner, applicant or by a duly permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by the. City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste from residential, commercial, construction, and industrial areas.within the City. It shall be the applicant's obligation to insure that the waste contractor used has obtained permits from the City of Diamond Bar to provide such services. 10 -XX Planning Commission Resolution No. 2011 APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, (909) 839-7040, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Any work within the Public Rights-of-Way will require a separate encroachment permit from the Public Works/Engineering Department. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 839-7020, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Plans shall conform to State and Local Building Code (i.e., 2007 California Building Code, California Plumbing Code, .California Mechanical Code, and the California Electrical Code) requirements and all other applicable construction codes, ordinances and regulations in effect at the time of plan check submittal. 2. The minimum design load for wind in this area is 85 M.P.H. exposures "C and the site is within seismic zone four (4). The applicant shall submit drawings. and calculations prepared by a California State licensed ArchIitect/Engineer with wet stamp and signature. 3. Application for which no permit is issued with.in 180 days following the date of application shall expire by limitation,. and plans and other data submitted for review may thereafter be returned to the applicant or destroyed by the Building Department. 4. Every permit issued by the Building Department shall expire if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit. 5. Construction activities causing the operation of any tools or equipment used in construction, drilling, repair, alteration, or demolition work shall be conducted Mon.-Sat. between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. 6. Blease submit a total of five 5 full set of plans including the grading for review to the Building &Safety Division after the plans have been approved by the Planning Division/Commission. 7. Provide structural design for pole, method of attachments, and footing design. 8.- . Submit electrical. plans showing all circuits. 9. Indicate pole height from finished floor. 10 Indicate all easements on the site plan. . All retaining.walls shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Division and Public Works Department for review and approval. 11` Planning Commission Resolution No.. 2011 XX 6 UK Hp- -:225an 'Qpv' qz 2? mv g t:ROH-'OPD= EMS? MH 5A re, 2 q q a 0 '.'�ARAPU sap, "I'm P's A 2 Ri p t; tat", "n 3, 6 2 2 L g, CD CD �j > DZ mk z^ '6i Z� (D m �n C �d ' 6 UK Hp- -:225an 'Qpv' qz 2? mv g t:ROH-'OPD= EMS? MH 5A re, 2 q q a 0 '.'�ARAPU sap, "I'm P's A 2 Ri p t; tat", "n 3, 6 2 2 L g, CD CD �j > DZ mk z^ '6i Z� (D m t\ � 9t`mfr• J' / �'�� '�I 4',`�t ✓ Y� :fie \ , , a r - n c .9304 MUM ( i f aN� HUGH GH R ef5 � ,r i zS�o u0E Ria' r _ oar ,r / Fg Oe gifi"g�"geQ,F .:Yfl ..I•,j• .y$ 4$��m6cr�e"ieN6co a :e i piGn IR 4yF aaizeg�lS ./J}tI: 9znp,�cm 8��$go�� INCH FORT oa€�Cme6 9 Eszb 1 a� N g 3E1 _a� mzO F� a j� i Z SIm rn f ok 1 1 t I 1 1 1 t 1 I 1 I I 1 , Ili I I pii ,1, , 1 I 1 1 I it 1 I I „ i I , I • -------------- Z SIm rn f Dpi Z SIm Dpi n� g� C n€ rn z u IF u I� ra g_ § n Z\� _._._._:_ 1R ccs" zz- R Man 11 4 a '•,1 e ° m ;>o z ['� b a+ Q,,c,� N _ s a A° 3 Qm . ti �, V' fid z t77 z Fx = @ a din Z ° J i 41 M. ol m z m - aGi rn --� 9_o z s s tee¢ �h �Z—I i D D 8 �. 9� N� .Z o 0 0 0 N r'� 8cp rR r ru q gig6z t rn I ru < -i i 6 .., I x oaf /-t Aw- i n a 1 r ,C•p 6 NY ` rPf�'11lkr l �Pril . i �� u� $ z;31, i"Olk$f' rtfl'a° tf�}111),n 1 i 4 :� 4..� �n I �i� 1"Y �C.i'f �(� f;7�¢'r��—��•�i' f 7qt p1� rt [g• t(I � b , I `V ems! TTT(•^^' 1 6 f I 4 g 4.q _m 3 3a _ m Q ❑ $ m N I. I—� I I � o I —--Ja INn= �I RZ —7941 11 II l D — D Z FIN- 0 c \� m 3 �^ m 0 a p 0 - o r 3 z p cl RF$2 e 3 S e -FS 6$ e8 z0 XM �je$az :�o �nss PE. R.5 v Z sga e s gg�$ so s3;E y s; z g � s. e �s��g• $ 6 C €2 a F 3 E­ g 5 Y s L'. N p � s 3 •�S��- Wks Ea q a. � - � $ aslitc co Z .� my c z Asa 10O cil Z - e ® m B m m�o � m 0 x a F. a ="6 ;=-\a eek p" R: agog e" uU "EFR¢ "S.� '"e"' � "R G� " ej"5o5 E ?a" Gg35 So51° c'$5'ye n5'dr S"aoa R. 3g :- s__£ s` -=Q5 "Ea ",-:�� q;> - Sas oGes �a$ S6 s °i y ag osy' sma �Q p a4�, qyy" s F V D. i, $G a� So 2p—•a 6 F 6 j., ;^3a•tm� Q G s� X93oRg g. Fro c _S8'a$ _ 3 ^`E Eg;2s g N Iff, ?51 .. r S 33: �a� as S 8gd 9 a ��". ea er c3. „tla ,`sa£ " s ae5 $ 5- r$i 14 5.o-2: a.p k " 5u. S • -5 5 t y S' s, a 6.a ' ZR vgQ 2IH S aov oCr. e' 33 �g� _ j 53 �e s =9s 4 C gg 41@g n ' p ® m B m m�o � m 0 x a "R G� R. V D. Flrtm�� 89,0 iE W -. 03 ,co 'o C.4 C: E; CC) cl, �2 p 0 INORM 0 x lw am |E04566_SkePhotos Looking west to existing T -Mobile equipment area. Looking north toproposed T'Mobi|e354tBroadleaf Tree Proposed location for T - Mobile tree |E04566_ShePhotos An existing carrier within property Looking north to existing Water Tank on property |E04566_gtePhotns Empty gravel area on property Looking east toproposed T-Mobi|etree location. am WFOM�M. Ei4 r CD CL �4 Ag ui it El El (D 0 AC oL J w. a0Lir' I r'xat, El SVI ra Jj K�,Ajplmmmll IF mog N U) D 0 0 O E cu ,a) 0- 2 a. a) C: 0 0 IN P - z n LU < m Q z Z Lli 0 < 0 E3 -j Lli LL> OD z 2 0 C) I E: C: C: r- C: .0 .2 .0 .2 .2 0 a _0 _0 "0 m m cu ED 0 0 0 40- 0 0 40- n co 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) C: C: C: c r- .0 co m m m m c C: c C: c c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 Q a a a a 0- m 0-* ca 0� m CL cu cl cu CL m CL cu q (1) a) (1) (1) C) n Z CL 0- 0. CD- CL D- CL E E E E E E E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L) L) L) 0 r C: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CL n _0 _0 a) -a (D _0 a) _0 (D _0 a) _0 (D 0 0 0 0 C rz C: r_ —r- r- r- 0 r- r_ 0 c c c r C: .0 co C13 m m m cu cu co 15— m0 � .0 m0 m M .0 E .2 E -a .0 E .2 E -a - .0 E -a - .2 E -a - .2 E -a CL 00 n IL 0- 42 <.C: _,o "'o "'o ,,-o -�O- 0 U) ca C: CL C: 0 E < a) >1 0 Q) (n cn >o :3 - 2 0 a) > 0 0- co co 0 -5 3: 0 F- < < < z 1-5 CY) U-) 0- — 00 cy.) C\l 0) C� 0 0 LO N C� 0 — t� 0- CY) — , (2) It 0 I 0 — 1 0 CY) 1 0 CL CC) 0 C? 00 00 n 0 0 ca 0 0 0 't 0 0 C\l CIJ Cj NN CL Cj C\l C\l 0 N -1 0 0 C\l (MD. -j -J >� EL -1 060 cl -i n z n n EL a rL WD D n rr D r aJ.ryn' E n- ❑-j ❑ C) CL W > 2 uj cl� -6 U) C: Z C: — CY5 0 0 rz C: 0 .2 0 0 ..2 . 0 U) *cn > 0 -j 0 -j > C:m U) 0 X (1) w 0 > (D U w U) a) m =3 > 0- 0 , w n Do- IF , 0 a 0 F - E 2 4- 0 ra-) E p -0 0 �L- 0 r .0 _0 CU 0 0 0.0 0 C) D 0 10 0 a) i;:, -0 0 a) E L) ry _j 0 -0 -0 "o 0 C: -0 � Co -0 z cu 0 Lli 0 a) cn m z cu L) C: a) 0 m cu (D co cu 0 _0 co 0 z Lo L) E 0 z LD E < E m m '-r- * m E E E E 0) 0 1-, (1) Lo Cl) 0 z 0 'r- ` 0 — 0 (D 0 F- 0 0 (1) ry CD (= M0 C (D rl- z . ❑ co 0 NW w IL LLO m 0 'T (N M (D> NQ CO 0 N q C\J CO 0 CY) C\j 0 cli — 0 00 CL — N — C\j 1 1* < CIJ — , I — I 'so C C: C: m c co C: C: C: rz C: C: C: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -a "0 '0 "0 -0 _0 a m ca m m ca cu m M ca cu m m m 0 4- 0 L- 10 40- 40 40- 10 10 1.0- 40- Lo- 40- 10- 40- 0) C: rn C: 0) C: 0) C: 0) C: 0) C: 0) C: 0) C: co C: co m m m m mm cu m m m m ca C: 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 C: 0 0 0 .0 .0 0 0 .0 .0 . 0 w 0 m ca m m ca m .2 cu .0 m .2 m 0 CL DL 0- a CL 0- CL C). CL CL c- 0- 0- CL C_ CU CL m 0. m a m CL m CL CU C. CU CL CU CL cu CL m CL m rL cu C_ m C_ m (D a) a) a) — 2 2 .2 a) — a) a) CD (D a) a) �6 — a) a) CD CD a) a) 0- m 0- CL CL CL CL C. CL 0- CL 0_ 0- 0- E E E E E E E E E E E E E E 0 L) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 L) 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C: C: a rz 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4- 0 0 0 4- 0 a) a) a) (D (1) W W CD W (1) CD (1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C tr- 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm .2 E .2 E .2 E .2 E E E UE c--) E .0 E -a .2 E — Co:) -a �0: 0 �o CL 40- CL 'a - 0 CIL 4- Ti O� I - o CL 0-0 40- 0-10 CL IR C: O_ < l= CL < C 0_'o < -C a , < C: CL < c < C: < < r= < N r3 U) E (D L) E co ca "0 a) 0 - 0 0) 0 m E ca 0 '0 CD m 1= J__ Cf) m U) m C -0 0C Lli cu = > :3 Q ca > > < Q) M L) 0)am' L) CD 0 (1) n cu U_ co C: ca a) (1) 0 co m m _j < < < < < < z z (D z CD 0 Q 0 z 0 0 z ❑ tn N — 0 m co CX) C14 N *41 Cf) CO m — m I- N fl- 0) C14 0) 00 ED — C? N M r C? C? O N C? CD C) 0 0 0 C) %r CD CU) C) 0 CIA r. N C) N 0 cli C\j 0 (D N 0 N0 C\j N co n a IL 0 IL n n 0- :D -i CL ry ry CL :D C_ cr_ C) CC ry 0 CL C) U Q 0 (D CD rn Z _0 E E 0 L) > :3 L) U) a) L) cU) a) C CD U) 2� C: ca U) uj U) (1) (n a) m _0 U) Q) . a) ry W C= > > c .0 0 M cl) >. 4' > = " cn o 0 0 — - — E -i — E -i E -j 5 E CD — .— 0 E — 0 E a) -o w C: ca m '.0 0) Co m Cl) '_ - m a) LL - m a 0 14 0 :3 �G 'o (D - — c CD 'i-- -& 0) C: a) '- cr 0) C: :3 E U) a) 0) o (D 0 E u) a) a) C (a Cy. a). r M U, 4= ;E'; M En CL tG (D o o— 0) C� o- 0) (Y o. z -1 0 co) a) "ql Cll C3 cn n ca m co LL U) m LL �� U) L) E U) r) -1i _0 ' 0 0 Q) -6 U) L) U) U) z gl Lo o Lo -'t r'- o — �: 0 = 0 E 3: L) !E 3: L) C:) r -O o o �: Ln 3: ED y.Chi 2 M 0 t (3) C\j L" Zi N cl) o') z N — (D o (1) NCS (1) M z n a) M :;7 n t a) — c) c\i 0 0 LO o� c\j — (1) OZ co — (1) 0 CY) L cL n _3 C\j — — — — File review -d'bvi , on ' end ireatiy. for scan ing