The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About02/26/2008PLANNING FILE COPY COMMISS101 AGENDA February 7:00 2692008 D.M. South Coast Air Quality Management District Government Center Building - Auditorium 21865 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA Chairman Vice Chairman Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Steve Nelson Tony Torng Kwang Ho Lee Kathleen Nolan Jack Shah Copies of staff reports or other written documentation relating to agenda items are on file in the Planning Division of the Community Development Department, located at 21825 Copley Drive, and are available for public inspection. If you have questions regarding an agenda item, please call (909) 839-7030 during regular business hours. In an effort to comply with the requirements of Title Il of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 9990, the City of Diamond Bar requires that any person in need of any type of special equipment, assistance or accommodation(s) in order to communicate at a City public meeting must inform the Community Development Department at (909) 839-7030 a minimum of 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting. - - " e' ,,,...,.y i ne uay or uiamond tsar uses recycled paper drinking in the Auditorium and encourages you to do the same CITY OF DIAMOND BAR PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 26, 2008 AGENDA CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Next Resolution No. 2008-07 1. ROLL CALL: COMMISSIONERS: Chairman Steve Nelson, Vice Chairman Tony Torng, Kwang Ho Lee, Kathleen Nolan, Jack Shah 2. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is the time and place for the general public to address the members of the Planning Commission on any item that is within their jurisdiction, allowing the public an opportunity to speak on non-public hearing and non -agenda items. Please complete a Speaker's Card for the recording Secretary (completion of this form is voluntary There is a five-minute maximum time limit when addressing the Planning Commission 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Chairman 4. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following items listed on the consent calendar are considered routine and are approved by a single motion. Consent calendar items may be removed from the agenda by request of the Commission only. 4.1 Minutes of Regular Meeting: January February 12, 2008. 5. OLD BUSINESS: None. 6. NEW BUSINESS: None. 7. PUBLIC HEARING(S): 7.1 Development Review No. 2007-39 — Under the authority of Development Code Section 22.48, the applicant is requesting approval for a one-story addition of approximately 1,151 square feet to an existing two-story residence of approximately 1,701 square feet plus a two -car garage. Project Address: 23802 Gold Rush Drive Property Owner: Mr. & Mrs. Stanley Wan 23802 Gold Rush Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Applicant: Mr. Manual A. Sanchez, Alex Construction Co. 934 Herald Street Redlands, CA 92374 1 I Fj LF. _-J h.��` l . � ; MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 12, 2008 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Nelson called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. in the South Coast Air Quality Management District/Government Center Auditorium, 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Commissioner Lee led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Kwang Ho Lee, Kathleen Nolan, Jack Shah, Vice Chairman Tony Torng and Chairman Steve Nelson. Also present: Nancy Fong, Community Development Director; Greg Gubman, Planning Manager; David Alvarez, Planning Technician; David Meyer, Planning Consultant; and Stella Marquez, Senior Administrative Assistant. 2. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: None 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: As presented. 4. CONSENT CALENDAR: 4.1 Minutes of Regular Meeting of January 8, 2008. VC/Torng moved, C/Lee seconded to approve the January 8, 2008, Minutes as presented. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 5. OLD BUSINESS: None 6. NEW BUSINESS: None 7. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS: VC/Torng, Lee, Nolan, Shah None Chair/Nelson None 7.1 Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-13 and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-08 — Under the authority of Development Code Sections 22.48 and 22.56, the applicant requested approval to construct a 4,026 livable square -foot addition to an existing 4,035 square -foot single family residence. FEBRUARY 12, 2008 PAGE 3 PROPERTY OWNER APPLICANT: PLANNING COMMISSION Jesse Omelos 3385 Clover Place Ontario, CA 91761 Pinnacle Building Structure 2552 Wagon Train Lane Diamond Bar, CA 91765 PC/Meyer presented staff's report and requested Planning Commission approval of Development Review No. 2007-32, based on the Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. PC/Meyer responded to C/Shah that there would be cut and fill in a portion of the front yard area. The applicant is importing a little more than 2500 cubic yards. Chair/Nelson asked for clarification regarding best management practices being used downstream and wondered why those practices would not be moved further upstream closer to where the grading was taking place. PC/Meyer explained how erosion control regulations would apply to this project. This is not the only line of defense, just the first in a series. Chair/Nelson opened the public hearing. There was no one present who wished to speak on this item. Chair/Nelson closed the public hearing. C/Nolan moved, VC/Torng seconded, to approve Development Review No. 2007-32, based on the Findings of Fact and conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Nolan, VC/Torng, Lee, Nolan, Shah Chair/Nelson NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None 8.2 Development Review No. 2007-34 — Under the authority of Development Code Section 22.48, the applicant requested approval to construct a new three-story 6,844 square foot single-family residence with an attached 958 square foot 4 -car garage and swimming pool. The subject property consists of 50,094 gross square feet and is zoned R-1 40,000 (Rural Residential, RR) with an underlying General Lane Use designation of Rural Residential (RR). FEBRUARY 12, 2008 PAGE 5 a►MFT PLANNING COMMISSION C/Lee asked from where to where does staff consider a building height. CDD/Fong explained that the ordinance states that the measurement is taken from the finished grade on the outside. PC/Meyer was correct when he said the building was measured from the outside. The difficulty in explaining why the tip of the roof extends above 35 feet you would likely find that the finished grade inside of the building is higher. From the interior measuring up from finished grade the building would meet the 35 -foot height limit. A two dimensional drawing appears to be out of alignment whereas a 3-D drawing would show the true dimensions and height. Staff is very serious about requiring new construction to meet the City's standards. PC/Meyer assured C/Lee that from the outside, the finished grade on both sides complies with the City's standards. When the project is completed and the measurement is taken from the finished grade to the top ridge beam of the building it will comply with the standards. PC/Meyer apologized for not having the 3-D graphic that would better show the Commission the true building height. PC/Meyer responded to C/Shah that the measurements are taken from the outside of the building and not from the inside of the building. Chair/Nelson opened the public hearing. Manual Gomez, representing the developer, said there was no grading at the property line except to direct water away from the property line onto the property. The developer is creating a natural swale. Chair/Nelson closed the public hearing. C/Lee moved, C/Nolan seconded to approve Development Review No. 2007-34, based on the Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Lee, Nolan, Shah, VC/Torng Chair/Nelson NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT COMMISSIONERS: None 8.3 Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-06(1) and Development Review No. 2005-33(1) — Under the authority of Development Code Sections 22.08, 22.58, 22.48 and 22.66, the applicant requested approval to modify the approved architectural elevations related to a remodel and addition of approximately 2700 square feet to an existing church. The Conditional Use Permit was to modify the original Conditional Use Permit approved by Los D A FEBRUARY 12, 2008 PAGE 7 PLANNING COMMISSION 8.4 Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-16 and Development Review No. 2007-37 — Under the authority of Development Code Sections 22.42, 22.48, 22.54 and 22.58, the applicant requested approval to co -locate a wireless telecommunications facility at Pantera Park. The subject property consists of 889,931 square feet (20.43 acres), and is zoned RPD -20,000 (Low Density Residential, or RL) with an underlying General Plan land use designation of Park. PROJECT ADDRESS: 738 Pantera Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 PROPERTY OWNER: City of Diamond Bar APPLICANT: Omnipoint Communications 3257 Guasti Road, Suite 200 Ontario, CA 91761 PT/Alvarez presented staff's report and recommended Planning Commission approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-16 and Development Review No. 2007-37 based on the Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. Chair/Nelson opened the public hearing. Lucy Ortega representing T -Mobile asked for Commission approval. VC/Torng asked if T -Mobile had a propagation map. Ms. Ortega responded that she did and using an overhead map showed the coverage area information to the Commission. VC/Torng moved, C/Lee seconded, to approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-16, Development Review No. 2007-37 and Variance No. 2007-08, based on the Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS VC/Torng, Lee, Nolan, Shah Chair/Nelson None None 9. PLANNING COMMISSIONER COMMENTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: C/Lee wished everyone a Happy New Year. 2 FEBRUARY 12, 2008 PAGE 9 PLANNING COMMISSION CDD/Fong reported that with respect to the proposed AERA project the technical studies are not yet complete and staff is studying several base maps in order to learn more about the biological and geotechnical constraints. There is a lot more work for staff to understand the project before sharing it with the Planning Commission. 11. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: As listed in tonight's agenda. ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Planning Commission, Chairman Nelson adjourned the regular meeting at 8:14 p.m. Attest: Respectfully Submitted, Nancy Fong, Community Development Director Steve Nelson, Chairman PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT CITY OF DIAMOND BAR - 21825 COPLEY DRIVE - DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 - TEL (909) 8397030 - FAX (909) 861-3117 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 7.1 MEETING DATE: February 26, 2008 CASE/FILE NUMBER: Development Review No. 2007-39 PROJECT LOCATION: 23802 Gold Rush Drive (Lot 33, Tract 43435) (APN: 8701-005-013) APPLICATION REQUEST: Under the authority of the Development Code Section 22.48, the applicant is requesting approval for a one-story addition of approximately 1,151 square feet to an existing two-story residence of approximately 1,701 square feet plus a two -car garage. PROPERTY OWNER: Mr. and Mrs. Stanley Wan 23802 Gold Rush Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 APPLICANT: Manuel A. Sanchez Calex Construction Co. 934 Herald Street Redlands, CA 92374 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Conditionally approve. DR 2007-39 Page 1 BACKGROUND: A. Site Description The project site is approximately 9,557 square feet and is generally rectangular in shape. It is developed with a two-story residence of approximately 1,701 square feet and a two -car garage. There are no restricted use or flood hazard areas on the project site. B. Site and Surrounding General Plan, Zoning and Use ANALYSIS: A. Applications and Review Authority (Code Section 22.481 Because the proposed addition is more than 50 percent of the existing habitable area of a single-family residence, approval of a Development Review Application by the Planning Commission is required. B. Development Review (Code Section 22.48) The purpose of Development Review is to establish consistency with the General Plan through the promotion of high aesthetic and functional standards to compliment and add to the economic, physical, and social character of the City. The process ensures that new development and intensification of existing development yields a pleasant living, and attracts the interests of residents and visitors as the result of consistent exemplary design. Development Standards The comparison matrix below shows that the proposed project has met the development standards for the RL (RPD -20,000-2U) zoning district. DR 2007-39 Page 2 General Plan Zone Applicable Uses Development Code Standards Project Site Low Density Residential - Max. (RPD -20,000-2U) RL Residential 3 DU/Acre RL RL RPD -20,000-2U RL Residential North RL RPD -20,000-2U RL Residential South RL RPD -20,000-2U RL Residential East RL RPD -20,000-2U & RL Residential West R-1-10,000 ANALYSIS: A. Applications and Review Authority (Code Section 22.481 Because the proposed addition is more than 50 percent of the existing habitable area of a single-family residence, approval of a Development Review Application by the Planning Commission is required. B. Development Review (Code Section 22.48) The purpose of Development Review is to establish consistency with the General Plan through the promotion of high aesthetic and functional standards to compliment and add to the economic, physical, and social character of the City. The process ensures that new development and intensification of existing development yields a pleasant living, and attracts the interests of residents and visitors as the result of consistent exemplary design. Development Standards The comparison matrix below shows that the proposed project has met the development standards for the RL (RPD -20,000-2U) zoning district. DR 2007-39 Page 2 Development RL (RPD -20,000-2U) Proposed Meet Feature Zoning District Requirement Requirements Yes (established by LA County which Minimum Lot Area 20,000 square feet. 9,557 square feet used lot averaging and is an existing legal lot of record Residential Density 1 single-family unit 1 single-family unit Yes Front yard setback 20 feet 22.92 feet Yes Side yard setbacks 5 & 10 feet 8.83 & 19.16 feet Yes Rear setback 20 feet 36.38 feet Yes Building height 35 feet from 22.5 feet from Yes natural/finished grade finished grade Separation between 15 feet 40.83 & 24.83 feet Yes adjacent residences Lot coverage 40% (maximum) 27% Yes Parking Two -car garage Two -car garage Yes (minimum) 2. Architectural Features, Colors, Material and Floor Plan The City's Design Guidelines have been established to encourage a better compatible building and site design that improves the visual quality of the surrounding area through aesthetically pleasing site planning, building design, and landscape architecture. Additionally, a primary objective is to promote compatibility with adjacent uses in order to minimize any potential negative impacts. The proposed addition continues the architectural style of the residence. The style of the windows and trim, wood siding, the roof and colors of the addition will match the existing. As a result, the proposed project is compatible in design to other homes in the neighborhood. Additionally, the project neighborhood is a combination of one and two-story homes ranging in size from 1,701 to 6440 habitable square feet. The larger homes are on Gold Rush Drive near Highcrest Drive. Recently, a 2,630 square foot addition to an existing 2,777 square foot residence was approved on Gold Rush Drive. The subject residence will be 2,852 with the proposed addition. The project site is 9,557 square feet and large enough to accommodate the proposed addition. DR 200739 Page 3 The proposed project adds a family room, play room and master bedroom with bathroom to the first floor. The second floor is unchanged and contains three bedrooms and two bathrooms. 3. Landscaping A landscape plan was not submitted with this project's application. The applicant is required to replace any landscaping and/or irrigation damaged or destroy within the front yard during construction. Said landscaping and irrigation shall be installed prior to final inspection or Certificate of Occupancy. C. Additional Review The City's Public Works Department and Building and Safety Division reviewed this project. Their recommendations are within the attached draft resolution. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The City has determined that this project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), under Section 15301(e) of the CEQA Guidelines. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: Notice for this project was published in the Inland Valley Bulletin and the San Gabriel Valley Tribune on February 15, 2008. Public hearing notices were mailed to approximately 58 property owners within a 500 -foot radius of the project site, the public notice was posted in three public places and the project site was posted with a display board by February 14, 2008. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends No. 2007-39, based attached resolution. Prepared by: that the Planning on the Findings of Fac 4Ann4Lunguso iate anner Attachments: t Commission approve Development Review and conditions of approval as listed within the Reviewed by: Greg Gubman, AICP, Planning Manager 1. Draft Resolution; 2. Covenant and Agreement to Maintain aSingle-Family Residence; 3, Aerial; and 4. Exhibit "A" -site plan, floor plan, roof plan and elevations dated February 26, 2008 DR2007-39 Page 4 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2008 -XX A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 2007-39, AND CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, FOR A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A FIRST STORY ADDITION OF APPROXIMATELY 1,151 SQUARE FEET TO AN EXISTING TWO-STORY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH A TWO -CAR GARAGE LOCATED AT 23802 GOLD RUSH DRIVE - APN: 8701-055-013. A. RECITALS. The property owner, Mr. & Mrs. Stanley Wan and applicant, Manuel A. Sanchez of Calex Construction Company Lee, have filed applications for Development Review No. 2007-39 and categorical exemption for a property located at 23802 Gold Rush Drive, Diamond Bar, Los Angeles County, California. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review and categorical exemption shall be referred to as the "Application." 2. Public hearing notices were mailed to approximately 58 property owners within a 500 -foot radius of the project site, the public notice was posted in three public places and the project site was posted with a display board. Notification of the public hearing for this project was provided in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers. 3. On February 26, 20087, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted and concluded a duly noticed public hearing on the Application. B. RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: This Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. The Planning Commission hereby finds that the project identified above in this Resolution is categorically exempt according to Section 15301 (e) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and guidelines promulgated thereunder. Furthermore, the categorical exemption reflects the independent judgment of the City of Diamond Bar. 3. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds and determines that, having considered the record as a whole including the findings set forth below, and changes and alterations which have been incorporated into and conditioned upon the proposed project set forth in the application, there is no evidence before this Planning Commission that the project proposed herein will have the potential of an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Based upon substantial evidence, this Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effects contained in Section 753.5 (d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 4. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein, this Planning Commission hereby finds as follows: a. Development Review (1) The design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, development standards of the applicable zone district, design guidelines, and architectural criteria for specialized areas (e.g., specific plans, community plans, boulevards, or planned developments.) On July 25, 1995, the City adopted its General Plan. The project site was established and homes were built prior to the City's incorporation and General Plan's adoption. The General Plan land use designation for the project site is RL Maximum 3 DU/AC. This designation allow for lot varying in size from 8,500 to 20,000 square feet for the development of a single-family residence. The project site is 9,557 square feet and developed with a single-family residence. Therefore, the project site is in compliance with the adopted General Plan. The project site is in the RPD-20,000-2UL zoning district. As prescribed in the Development Code, the development standards of the RL zoning district apply to the project site. The proposed project meets all the development standards of this zoning district as illustrated in the comparison matrix within the staff report The proposed addition continues the architectural style of the residence. The style of the windows and trim, wood siding, tile roof and colors of the addition will match the existing. As a result, the proposed project is compatible in design to other homes in the neighborhood and meets the City's Design Guidelines. Additionally, the project neighborhood is a combination of one and two-story homes ranging in size from 1,701 to 6440 habitable square feet. The subject residence 2 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2008 -XX will be 2,852 with the proposed addition. The project site is 9,557 square feet and large enough to accommodate the proposed addition. (2) The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. With the approval and construction of the proposed project, the current use of the project site as a single-family residence will be maintained. As discussed in Finding (1) above, the proposed project can be accommodated at the project site. Additionally, the architectural style, colors and materials are compatible with other homes in the neighborhood. As such, the proposed project is not expected to interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future development. The proposed project is not expected to intensify the existing use to an extent that will create traffic or pedestrian hazards. (3) The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the characteristics of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22.48 Diamond Bar Development Code, the General Plan, City Design Guidelines, or any applicable specific plan. As discussed in Finding (1) above, the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan, development standards of the RL zoning district and the City's Design Guidelines. As a result, the proposed addition is compatible with the characteristics of the neighborhood and will maintain a harmonious, orderly and attractive development. There is no specific plan for the project area. (4) The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public, as well as its neighbors, through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, and color that will remain aesthetically appealing As discussed in Findings (1), (2), and (3) above, the proposed project will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture and color that will remain aesthetically appealing while offering variety in color and texture and a low level of maintenance. 3 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2D08 -XX (5) The proposed project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious (e.g., negative affect on property values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Before the issuance of any City permits, the proposed project is required to comply with all conditions within the approved resolution and the Building and Safety Division, Public Works Department, and Fire Department requirements. The referenced agencies, through the permit and inspection process, will ensure that the proposed project is not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. 5. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth above, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Application subject to the following conditions and Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated by reference: A. Planning Division Prior to final inspection and Certificate of Occupancy issuance, the applicant shall repair or replace landscaping and irrigation destroyed in the front yard. B. Building and Safety Division 1. Smoke detectors shall be in conformance with the 2007California Building Code 2. All bedrooms shall comply with all rescue window requirements. 3. Building setback for any slope (toe or top) shall meet Chapter 18 of the 2007 California Building Code. 4. Construction plans shall specify 5/8" X between the garage and house addition. 5. An application, for which no permit is issued within 180 days following the date of application, shall expire by limitation, and plans and other data submitted for review may thereafter be returned to the applicant or destroyed by the Building and Safety Division. 4 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2008 -XX 6. Every permit issued by the Building and Safety Division shall expire if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit. 7. Southern California Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) approval and clearance shall be required prior to issuance of a demolition permit. 8. Applicant shall submit five full sets of plans, including the grading plan, to the Building and Safety Division afterthe plans have been approved by the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall. (a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and (b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, to: Mr. & Mrs. Stanley Wan, 23802 Gold Rush Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 and Mr. Manuel A. Sanchez, Calex Construction Company, 934 Herald Street, Redlands, CA 92374. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH OF FEBRUARY 2008, BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. [ON Steve Nelson, Chairman I, Nancy Fong, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of February 2008, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSTAIN: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: ATTEST: Nancy Fong, Secretary 5 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2008 -XX COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS USE PERMITS, COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL NEW AND REMODELED STRUCTURES PROJECT #: Development Review No. 2007-39 SUBJECT: First Sto Addition to Single -Family Residence PROPERTY OWNER: Mr. & Mrs. Stanley Wan APPLICANT: Manuel A. Sanchez LOCATION: 23802 Gold Rush Drive ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT, APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION AT (909) 839-7030, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements in accordance with Government Code Section 66474.9(b) (1), the applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, and its officers, agents and employees, from any claim, action, or proceeding to attack, set-aside, void or annul, the approval of Development Review No. 2007-39 brought within the time period provided by Government Code Section 66499.37. In the event the city and/or its officers, agents and employees are made a party of any such action: (a) Applicant shall provide a defense to the City defendants or at the City's option reimburse the City its costs of defense, including reasonable attorneys fees, incurred in defense of such claims. (b) Applicant shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against the City descendents. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any 6 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2008 -XX claim, action of proceeding, and shall cooperate fully in the defense thereof. 2. This approval shall not be effective for any purpose until the applicant and owner of the property involved have filed, within twenty-one (21) days of approval of this Development Review No. 2007-39 at the City of Diamond Bar Community Development Department, their affidavit stating that they are aware of and agree to accept all the conditions of this approval. Further, this approval shall not be effective until the applicants pay remaining City processing fees, school fees and fees for the review of submitted reports. 3. All designers, architects, engineers, and contractors associated with this project shall obtain a Diamond Bar Business Registration and zoning approval for those businesses located in Diamond Bar. 4. Signed copies of Planning Commission Resolution No. 2008 -XX Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 5. Prior to plan check, revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval. 6. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval shall be completed 7. The project site shall be maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of approval and all laws, or other applicable regulations. 8. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and any applicable Specific Plan in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 9. Site, grading, landscape/irrigation and driveway plans, elevations and sections shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of City permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 10. The single family residence shall not be used in a manner that creates adverse effects upon the neighborhood and environmental setting of the residential site to levels of dust, glare/light, noise, odor, traffic, or other disturbances to the existing residential neighborhood and shall not result in significantly adverse effects on public services and resources. The single family residence shall not be used for commercial/institutional purposes, or 7 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2008 -XX otherwise used as a separate dwelling. The property shall not be used for regular gatherings which result in a nuisance or which create traffic and parking problems in the neighborhood. 11. Property owner/applicant shall remove the public hearing notice board within three days of this project's approval. 12. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of City Planning, Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works Department, and Fire Department. B. Fees/Deposits Applicant shall pay development fees (including but not limited to Planning, Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works Department and Mitigation Monitoring) at the established rates, prior to issuance of building or grading permit (whichever comes first), as required by the City. School fees as required shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permit. In addition, the applicant shall pay all remaining prorated City project review and processing fees prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever come first. 2. Prior to any plan check, all deposit accounts for the processing of this project shall have no deficits. C. Time Limits The approval of Development Review No. 2007-39 shall expire within two years from the date of approval if the use has not been exercised as defined per Municipal Code Section 22.66.050 (b)(1). The applicant may request in writing a one year time extension subject to Municipal Code Section 22.60.050(c) for Planning Commission approval. D. Site Development 1. The project site shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the approved plans submitted to, approved, and amended herein by the Planning Commission, collectively labeled and referenced herein as Exhibit "A" dated February 26, 2008 including: site plan, floor plan, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors and landscaping/irrigation plan on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein and Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to the issuance of any permits, the Applicant shall complete and record a "Covenant and Agreement to Maintain a Single -Family Residence" on a form to be provided by the City. The covenant shall be completed and recorded with the Los Angeles County Recorders Office. 8 Planning commission Resolution No. 2008 -XX E. Solid Waste The site shall be maintained in a condition, which is free of debris both during and after the construction, addition, or implementation of the entitlement approved herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether during or subsequent to construction shall be done only by the property owner, applicant or by a duly permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste from residential, commercial, construction, and industrial areas within the City. It shall be the applicant's obligation to insure that the waste contractor used has obtained permits from the City of Diamond Bar to provide such services. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, (909) 839-7040, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General An Erosion Control Plan shall be submitted prior to the issuance of any City permits. These measures shall be implemented during construction between October 15t and April 15th. The erosion control plan shall conform to national Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards and incorporate the appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP's). 2. The applicant shall comply with Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) requirements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Please refer to City handouts. 3. Grading and construction activities and the transportation of equipment and materials and operation of heavy grading equipment shall be limited to between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. Dust generated by grading and construction activities shall be reduced by watering the soil prior to and during the activities and in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 402 and Rule 403. Reclaimed water shall be used whenever possible. Additionally, all construction equipment shall be properly muffled to reduce noise levels. 4. All equipment staging areas shall be located on the project site. Staging area, including material stockpile and equipment storage area, shall be enclosed within a 6 foot -high chain link fence. All access points in the defense shall be locked whenever the construction site is not supervised. B. Soils Report/Grading/Retaining Walls If 50 cubic yards or more of earth work occurs, the applicant shall submit a grading plan. The grading plan shall show the location of any retaining walls 9 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2008 -XX and the elevations of the top of wall/footing/retaining and the finished grade on both sides of the retaining wall. Construction details for retaining walls shall be shown on the grading plan. Calculations and details of retaining walls shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for review and approval. 2. If 50 cubic yards or more of earth work occurs, a geotechnical report shall be required. Upon approval of the geotechnical report, the applicant shall submit drainage and grading plans prepared by a Civil Engineer, licensed by the State of California, prepared in accordance with the City's requirements for the City's review and approval. A list of requirements for grading plan check is available from the Public Works Department. All grading (cut and fill) calculations shall be submitted to the City concurrently with the grading plan. C. Drainage Detailed drainage system information of the lot with careful attention to any flood hazard area shall be submitted. All drainage/runoff from the development shall be conveyed from the site to the natural drainage course. No on-site drainage shall be conveyed to adjacent parcels, unless that is the natural drainage course. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 839- 7020, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Plans shall conform to State and Local Building Code (i.e., 2007 California Building Code, California Plumbing Code, California Mechanical Code, and 2004 National Electrical Code) requirements and all other applicable construction codes, ordinances and regulations in effect at plan check submittal. 2. Before construction begins, the applicant shall install temporary construction fencing pursuant to the Building and Safety Division's requirements along the project site's perimeter. This fencing shall remain until the Building Official approves its removal. The Applicant shall provide temporary sanitation facilities while under construction. 3. Fire Department approval aay be required. Contact the Fire Department to check the fire zone for the location of your property. If this project is located in High Hazard Fire Zone it shall meet of requirements of the fire zone. a. All unenclosed under -floor areas shall be constructed as exterior wall. b. All openings into the attic, floor and/or other enclosed areas shall be covered with corrosion -resistant wire mesh not less than 1/4 inch or 10 Planning commission Resolution No. 2008 -XX more than 1/2 inch in any dimension except where such openings are equipped with sash or door. 4. The minimum design load for wind in this area is 80 M.P.H. exposures "C" and the site is within seismic zone four (4). The applicant shall submit drawings and calculations prepared by a California State licensed Architect/Engineer with wet stamp and signature. 5. Project shall comply with energy conservation requirements of the State of California Energy Commission. Kitchen and bathroom lights shall be fluorescent or controlled by a manual-on/auto off occupant sensor. 6. Check drainage patterns with Engineering Department. Surface water shall drain away from building at a 2% minimum slope. 7. Specify location of tempered glass as required by code. 8. Number of plumbing fixtures shall be in compliance with CBC Appendix 29. 9. The project shall be protected by a construction fence and shall comply with the NPDES & BMP requirements (sand bags, etc.) End 11 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2008 -XX N OD O �I 0 a �o G v _. m 3 3 CL o� a �o 0 SD 0 r� 0 0 0 3 Cf� m $ 088 8 S8 y m SHE 8 �v oy ro w 2 Q Up UU� C7 2; �=tea° 9 a�a UUUUw g ov (a7 NONd � m � N asa Q o gr m ••�Gi O �O� � m ¢ � F � � � � a U w 8 � U 2 � a F m w O F yo n ru v o m mLL h } 1❑y mO ZNKN Zw m waw mm pN Z °'m OWSaz 2Uy¢hO ZY °F woOG9 �0 QTp5z'UWO 5Q=E4¢ °°z Pz 6a552?Qo� ow �mora¢�ima(u � °O�z3az cis °� gz�zm wZ x ¢ yoFo 3:0Smug i¢a Fq Om w zz nux1��W�¢�OZw 2 wOZ�oiw[° aaaoig�Fn=�a� •zmww��xa0 O jwZ¢Ir.m031Z pNlQZ00 om �IWm )O��wz�oy�m w xm�pwzgw�d °Omw?ONy ¢W �s i3ga°o°a3ow g°°zSW�r°�Uo¢WWOm'� S�z�0ao-oxzo° oQ -= wO UOiY2°x>W m0 -z Owx¢a° wW¢w�a oomzE� � g`i9000c° � who~ oww '89Agh xa bzw NOmxs W a ¢9�2'4� mm3�wohmc� �uamv,3m3��'o03 D� 61646 6 Pm gag°�agm�o�ejo�uq�a b klni I' zg ur3 w.lr a rvw..r Z11 9 9 o m 9 9 9 m 0 -<J a a a W V y x V x n x x N x x x m b b b b b b b N I 0 r E po ¢g m ]�2 0 °oo 0 B q LL m Q o a�a cB� >R H a Sa l U g z O x z 'o �n a RYRR��Y 3 � �YRSRRR gni R N m �gRRT�Y bR�oR w `�n��yneY a A112F x—_rr w 6 r C HL RHO ijae"�j gMIR HHHHH S b klni I' zg ur3 w.lr a rvw..r Z11 gw C� 0 0 LL 0 W U) 0 a 0 vi zN Z tll m_ > �N Qm m a o x o 0 o W gym° ° c� �° � m�ZS�5OWy3J� wm Za OdO�U U N �Zaoag � SEm 0° O a a E Y �=Q L)j¢?paZ�zgNW hlal. �ppiF 2Q��N NS Z y�2Wa?aZa=ai�� O�Coo_Oq Q ��aU'3g4°�dmmua.ao (^u �imoi xa �aa� 0 O JrNNP �fl m r w w U., p o C� W ° U m C- X00 gxaZ�d � U 0 u ° 3 x NrtWU S �i rx U Opp 01 a 71 °t o o Ej 5 O Pu ° O o ¢ N J ° LL N 4 Z] o w m J LE y nEll O x w > a ci � R LLd(7p aJ`p]W p o C� W ° U m C- X00 gxaZ�d � U NrtWU S W� O Z Wa lZZP�� U N n ¢0°w a ci � R LLd(7p aJ`p]W TO- i z,6O r'Z lz � N LL70 C O°pper>>ZN ' 2,n°, R¢g a ZWmLLJ Mk'E N tj m�'�m¢a22 ro O°UQQ °aUa¢ Zn Qzua.Q< mN Qixfi_- u J WIN a 0 Q N U U W, J W �gytt \ O z O z z ;NW ; os � Sz aHOZ < $p1n TOT Fya� ----------�i--------------- �l II ' MU Z .�() OBD aN am< ,i 11 II II I I , II II I 02C mn0 M Z -,. r _ - • i I I L_�JI I I Ne I II LoJ n° i �I �Y 1g a"8 1 TMI I - 11 M g Fmiz az n �oC N °P�$ m"� Ta is Tj eu .pop ;m F[am�n ¢SyiAF�a �z Oo,� 91-nzZ �Z- ^� T ^O ZDV N�00 y�0 mDm D Z=r -JZZ OOZ 41 !^Z Z cu 0m mOD m 0 pm D,'MmpmomZ� bpF�mOIII ONQ (� 4011n 1J= Z 0+9JD;1 . o�> MU Z .�() OBD aN am< O?DZVS��I m Do>gzO;Z `[[tf�,,lpODZ0 aO Ta Oa Za ��3m0 o O0 02C mn0 M Z -,. r _ - • i m TRUSSES ON 2ND FLOOR k Co | ; n.,z § / ,N §! §E § ea (\ . \§\ .z N® .K2 k) F y \)) (� § > ; 0\ 2�[ ®§ �\ §)/ �z H § # //\ / § !,6 / > m TRUSSES ON 2ND FLOOR k uvtNl/EVERY31/2'ALONG ROOF EAVE ON ALL SIDES OF HOUSE n3 3 Lqw m 7 y s� �M - �_ m ; log m g g > ° tg��IS g � %W el (f1 CO aQ s W zd 9 F llmSp o O Sg 11PIA c Am P ' o $ =F 8 8 s9 Lpx° Ba�H oLa ---� u p n O QFi a gg�m4 gig - c — - ngtiMg a � o z O r -1m 03 z0 m D �9 $ D�a2� r g W O =- yox p q D n n 05)7 JEW S r mg 8 z- �N �� b S7GG`n• za F� b�mNg yyF $ P LJ v w'-O'mIlAOE WALLPANEL T cu O $ O _ m� m z w mi a>rN go m o, > _ Z= =CJ W ZO ! `- cn NO r € ma Z z y o >o z d L G m O g Q n axe 5 o Q 9 m fi5 O n xzz HD�Qa wmz{ga(;n�yvso�� m�-DI?�ND ZZO� D °�OmZO[m0 �m am; "mem . p�mg��oNy ��zm Nm°o m m im mn�g m�5m z cn O c m r D r o m m r �I < DfIW 2 ..:::.:::C� .....I :O .......... ......>>-I ............ r� DIII 4 3 M" ilfi II I �I PI 11� Pi i �?H i pO Z b I N, �mY95 F$ PI 11� Pi M1,2 1,tel II Inl i Izi 1114{ M1,2 1,tel II Inl � DIAPI0ID BAR X12;• r,,.PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT CITY OF DIAMOND BAR - 21825 COPLEY DRIVE - DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 - TEL. (909) 839-7030 - FAX (909) 861-3117 ITEM NO. DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: 10.2 February 26, 2008 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Nancy Fong, AICP, Community Development Director Joint Commission Training A training session for the Planning, Traffic and Transportation, and Parks and Recreation Commissions has been scheduled for March 19, 2008, at the Diamond Bar Center. Food and refreshments will be served at 5:30 pm and the training will begin at 6:30 pm. City Attorney Mike Jenkins will provide the Commissioners with, among other topics, an overview of the role of each Commission, the Brown Act, Conflict of Interest, liability issues, and Commissioner conduct/meeting management. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission attend the City Attorney training session. m of M F- Z Z W a0 F) J W Oo F-• ? U � Z 0 U N N 2E L, co U C) cD Z cD Z 0 Z cD Z 0 Z cD Z c3 Z (D Z (D z F= F_ F- P: I I I Z I I I I I I I co UC) o?= Z O Z 0= Z O Z O Z O Z 0 Z O Z O Z 0 D- CN �Il a Q w ¢ ¢ a ¢ Q Q ¢ U U� U U U U U U U J o J W a. -j J a J S J a. J a. J M J d J c � U U co LLI w Lu w O w w w M w w w w f0 C :Ez l5iz :Ez �iz 2z az �iz 2Ez 0- 2z co do 00 ZQ 00 zQ 00 zQ 00 zQ 00 ZQ 00 z~ 00 Z— 00 z~ 00 z~ M 0 M11 0 OS �0 LL 0 DO 0 o a0 OS 00 0 o 0 0 00 0 0� ao wz — wZ LL wZ wZ wz LL wZ wz 00 wz 00 wz LL LL — LL — J LL — J LL — J LL — J LL — J L� — J LL — J U (� F -Q OZ Q OZ F -Q OZ F -Q OZ ¢ OZ ¢ OZ F -d Oz F -d OZOZ I -Q z Ci z z z0 z z0 z Z Z Z �-F- ¢o F- F- ¢o F- F- ¢o F- F-. ¢o F- F- ¢o I-•" F- Q0 �- F- Q0 F-- F- ao F-• F ¢o UCD = UQ vii UQ� CL N Il = IL a_ 0_ U 0 CL x7-) JQ CL IY JQ CL x JQ a- IY J¢ CL Of J¢ CL O_ J¢ CL Of J¢ 0- N a -O ¢ LL w a- a.0E- Q LL Cn a-0 d LL o_0 Q lL a_0 d LL a_0 Q LL IZO Q LL CLO Q LL o -O Q LL O UN 0 In w O Z c ca 0 H wca wLU ¢w cei O U Q U CD Lu U Q ZT lY = wZ U a N wCD n C7 H z 0_ CL w 0_ IL 0 OJ Z w Z� Q << F- 1 ZQ O a (D� ¢ z wz CL d O S d w z 001 J E L _ OJz O IQ 0 >- LU ¢ ui o pZ x< po LLJ LU w Q Y06 Z 0_ CD U a J > w LU w �QQmm< Q S J J ¢ -•---� ¢ J J J J ¢ Q LL J CL Q 0 Q CL ¢ ¢ Q Q 0 Q Z Q J J a) .M- O M a) O CO N - p r N 0) Q) N N O CO a) fn I- C) 00 ik p # �O � CD O p (6 00 (6 � VV) N N Cl. p N N NN N C) N O N CD � O N N � O N O O O ON O N LU p U ori o UCL U ¢ UO N C IL U N O N N N �; g U D fCL- O w 2 a w > Q_ L) w c: O a) 0 3 Z 0 C O Q') 0::c C ,N O .-. 0 'N O C G a) N V) O O C i i C C C C J m J W w` •V) U) J J L.L.I W N Z �' �' p •O U Y Q' Y a_' a) N O V m Q;i �9 Ui CO S: w U .g Q m U w U -a) U Z_ >- m m c0 E > C o •- w— 0Y E w— X E w o 0 O a• O Z 0 0 S Z O �- LU N Z 7 cn � 0 Ll Li cED J cE9 w 2 Z c. J OU Q O a Z w a'Z a) O 0-0 �r� Wim= Z d°) Z Q� Y �- Q� CD Z o -2 y Q — C7 Z U O U r- d_ Q cn a� ¢ LL o E c) cr,c m -0- Z .t'' N Z W u5 Q V: 0 1 •C 3 Lo p '*6 Z (n Z (/J 'VCj a m L� 000 C O Z pip W Z O CO C Cl) CII Lo E °' O N� CN 3 O. Na' NC) Q N d N� N� N 04 NZ COyZ C�yZ NZ Z Z Z [6 a O O O U U U � d d Q Q Q H Ljj LLJ � W �Z 2Z 2Z 00 00 00 Zq z< ZQ 0Z 0 p� W 00 LL _ OZ 0Z Q z z Z z Q zH Q ZF- QLl Jp Q z a - 0-0a0 a0 LU LU Qti QW QLL Q CL LLI m p Z N LJ c� p z c F W J Z 0 2 `—' o O w a f1]W Q D J Q mW W -j LU LLJ rr J F-- LL UU UU O p z� zry z U — Z D Q o 0 n o U J Cl) (fl N T 1? N O O O O m N N N Ure p p p v m 3 c c o a� C)rr ` .r_ c z z �— (n o � J m W J W N w m oa. r C) co d N C7 Z O p J p F cn G Z' @ U n NZ aEn 3 0 a O. o d N co N N Z IIIICustomer IIII 111111 IIII IIIIIIIilllll Cor (IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIillll illllllilllll IIIIIIII Label 11-F, April 21 -, EXPRESS I _ EM 068302809 USMAIL • UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE® Post OfficeTo Addresse PO ZIP Code Day of Delivery Postage •171 • • � Delivery Attempt '-'m'dd.. ❑ AM Employee Signature ❑Next 02nd � 2nd Del. Day .D Date Accepted Scheduled Date of Delivery Return Recei t Fee D Mo. Da Delivery Attempt ❑ PM Time ❑ AM Employee Signature Month pay $ Mo. Day Year Scheduled Time of Delivery COD Fee Insurance Fee Mo. Day Delivery ❑ PM Time Accepted ❑ AM ❑ Naon ❑ 3PM $d. W Date Time ❑ AM Employee Signature ❑ PM Military Total Postage &Fees Mo' Day � ❑ PM Flat Rate ❑ or Weight ❑ 2nd Day ❑ 3M Day mm .P V , ER OF SIGNATURE(Ownealk.Ma//Only) AddRlonal merehandlaa lnwrandeb { dd NwaNar of elllneture bre0llect•tl.I wish depvery id Be made wWa>,d oblalning ofaddrasan Int'( Alpha Country Code Acceptance Emp. Initials ai•rrelura or addresses'a agem mdepveiy amPbyeefudges (het ertlele een be left In Saeun3 'addition anauttrortze that delivery employee Sslgnetura eanatNutes valid delNery lbs. ozs. • • Proof of NO DELNERY�wealn,rai', Hdlday METHOD OF PAYMEM: _.cwtom•r Express Mail Corpae[e Acct. No. - c- Fej'eral Agerx;y Acct. No. a Postal Sernce ALU. No. FROM: IPLFA3E PRIN71 `. r PHONE ( ) (PLEASE EASE PRINT ) PHONE � r J L IIIIIIIIIIIIIICustLabel omer C6pa IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIII 11 -F, April IIIIIilllllllll EXPRESS �M'a/L I _ EM 068302812 US •PE-10 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE® Post OfficeTo Addressee PO ZIP Code elivery Postage • • • • Delivery Attempt Time ❑ AM Employee Signature est❑ 2nd ❑ 2nd Del. Day @ $ Date Accepted led Date of Delivery Return Receipt Fee P Mo. Da Delivery Attempt ❑ PM Time ❑ AM Employee Signature pay $ Mo. Day Yearry letl Time of Delive COD Fee Insurance Fee Del Day Delivery Date ❑ PM @@ TimeAccepted AMEmployee Signature ❑ AM ❑ 3 PM $ Qd� $ Postage $ Fees No! DaTotal :. Y PM ❑ PM ay ❑3rd Day Voldi1/Al=OF SIGNATURE (Dorrrayryc Mall pnry) Adtlmonal marehandlss lnsuranea bFlat wa ofsl ab�9ueatad.I M.111 lNaty tooe medof Rate❑or Wight Country Code Acceptance Emp. Initials etldresneeor addressee's eryempkyea fuogesthet article can be left Ina locatw.n)arxtl authorize that ddlvary empkyea'splg0??gre tee Ibis. ozs. sort valid proofMdepvery.,.. NO DELNERYow"n" � Nolldey `. /'17 J MET HOD OF PAYMENT: Qretoner ti ExPless Mail Corporate Acct. W. Federal Agmry Acct. No. p Postal 3arvice Apdt. No. FROM: (PLEAsEPRI" ,. y - ', r PHONE ( f - l 7 TO: (PL"SE PRINT) PHONE r ( 1 Y I , L c Ff /,.-J - .I L J 1111111111111 IIIlilllllll 1111111 IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIilllllll Customer Cop IIIIIIilllll EXPRE SS _ EM .1111111 068302790 US MAIL '' "Day UNITEDSTATESPOSTALSERVICE, PostOfficeToA ddresse( IP Code of DeliveryPostage a � • • 11 Next Fl 2nd znd D¢i. Day $ Delivery Attempt Time Employee Signature ❑ AM 9 Date Accepted Scheduled Data of Delivery Return Receipt Fee Mo. Day PM Month Delivery Attempt Time Employee Signature El Day $ AM IMo. Day year Scheduled Time of Delivery COD Fee Insurance Fee Mo Day ❑ PM Accepted AM ❑Noon ❑ $$0AM Delivery Date Time❑ Employee Signature ❑ PM[rime 3 pM Military otal Postage & Fees Day❑ PM lat Rate ❑ or Weight ❑ 2nd Day ❑ 3rd Day $ V(AIVER OF SIONATLRE (DomesdeOnty) AddRlorial merclFendlN Iniuranee M vrNtl N walaerof sigrrahrre le rE IN: wat I int'I Alpha Country Code Acceptance Emp. Initials Wish of addressee oratldressee•s apent(H tlaliverytlell�very to tie medew�thoul oblaiMng dgnaturo .;l Iocation)and l authorize that tleNve ® ludgeathetart ceri to lett in secure lbs. ozs. • ern rY laloyee'a eY neWle �O(�atlNtea7 Pr9¢t ¢f dNiyayu t NO DELIVERY0wewk d ,, FbNd f r �' t METHOD OF PAYMENT: F...f 4 Z+� F"""a Map Gup to AM. No. A Federal Ager y Accl. No. W Postal Benita Acct. ib. •— FROM: (pLeAw pRINT) � TO: (PLEASE PRINT) r PHONE L l 1 .vi it _ ., ,.. %;✓j ,, ` '-'�i '`�-'r -1 L J CITY OF DIAMOND BAR NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING AND AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF DIAMOND BAR On February 26, 2008, the Diamond Bar Planning Commission will hold a regular session at 7:00 p.m., at the South Coast Quality Management District/Government Center Auditorium, 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California. Items for consideration are listed on the attached agenda. I, Stella Marquez, declare as follows: I am employed by the City of Diamond Bar. On February 22, 2008, a copy of the agenda of the Regular Meeting of the Diamond Bar Planning Commission was posted at the following locations: South Coast Quality Management District Auditorium 21865 East Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Diamond Bar Library 1061 Grand Avenue Diamond Bar, CA Heritage Park 2900 Brea Canyon Road Diamond Bar, CA 91765 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on February 22, 2008, at Diamond Bar, California. Stella Marquez Community Development Department g:\\affidavitposnn g. doe