Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/13/2000PLANNIN FILE Copy COMMISSIviv FaliTel It June 13, 2000 7:00 P -M* South Coast Air Quality Management District Auditorium 21865 East Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA Chairman Vice Chairman Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Steve Nelson Bob Zirbes George Kuo Joe Ruzicka Steve Tye Copies of staff reports or other written documentation relating to agenda items are on file in the Planning Division of the Dept of Community & Development Services, located at 21660 E. Copley Drive, Suite 190, and are available for public inspection. if you have questions regarding an agenda item, please call (909) 396-5676 during regular business hours. In an effort to comply with the requirements of Title 11 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the City of Diamond Bar requires that any person in need of any type of special equipment, assistance or accommodation(s) in order to communicate at a City public meeting must inform the Dept of Community & Development Services at (909) 396-5676 a minimum of 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting. • Please refrain from smoking, eating or drinking in the Auditorium The City of Diamond Bar uses recycled paper and encourages you to do the same City of Diamond Bar Planning Commission MEETING RULES PUBLIC INPUT The meetings of the Diamond Bar Planning Commission are open to the public. A member of the public may address the CommissionVh the subject of one or more agenda items and/or other items of which are within the subject iiLttV JAnsdiction of the Diamond Bar Planning Commission. A request to address the Commission should be subrr� ed 1114,4ting at the public hearing, to the Secretary of the Commission. As a general rule, the b4ortunity for public comments will take place at the discretion of the Chair. However, in order to facilitate the meeting, persons who are interested parties for an item may be requested to give their presentation at the time the item is called on the calendar. The Chair may limit individual public input to five minutes on any item; or the Chair may limit the total amount of time allocated for public testimony based on the number of people requesting to speak and the business of the Commission. Individuals are requested to conduct themselves in a professional and businesslike manner. Comments and questions are welcome so that all points of view are considered prior to the Commission making recommendations to the staff and City Council. In accordance with State Law (Brown Act), all matters to be acted on by the Commission must be posted at least 72 hours prior to the Commission meeting. In case of emergency or when a subject matter arises subsequent to the posting of the agenda, upon making certain findings, the Commission may act on item that is not on the posted agenda. INFORMATION RELATING TO AGENDAS AND ACTIONS OF THE COMMISSION Agendas for Diamond Bar Planning Commission meetings are prepared by the Planning Division of the Community and Development Services Department. Agendas are available 72 hours prior to the meeting at City Hall and the public library, and may be accessed by personal computer at the number below. Every meeting of the Planning Commission is recorded on cassette tapes and duplicate tapes are available for a nominal charge. ADA REQUIREMENTS A cordless microphone is available for those persons with mobility impairments who cannot access the public speaking area. The service of the cordless microphone and sign language interpreter services are available by giving notice at least three business days in advance of the meeting. Please telephone (909) 396-5676 between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. HELPFUL PHONE NUMBERS Copies of Agenda, Rules of the Commission, Cassette Tapes of Meetings (909) 396-5676 Computer Access to Agendas (909) 860 -LINE General Agendas (909) 396-5676 email: info@ci.diamond-bar.ca.us Next Resolution No. 2000-8 PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF DIAMOND BAR Tuesday, June 13, 2000 AGENDA CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: a 1. ROLL CALL: COMMISSIONERS: Chairman Steve Nelson, Vice Chairman Bob Zirbes, George Kuo, Joe Ruzicka, and Steve Tye. 2. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is the time and place for the general public to address the members of the Planning Commission on any item that is within their jurisdiction, allowing the public an opportunity to speak on non-public hearing and non -agenda items. Please complete a Sneaker's Card for the recording Secretary (Completion of this form is voluntary) There is afive-minute maximum time limit when addressing the Planning Commission. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Chairman 4. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following items listed on the consent calendar are considered routine and are approved by a single motion. Consent calendar items may be removed from the agenda by request of the Commission only: 4.1 Minutes: May 23, 2000 5. OLD BUSINESS: None. 6. NEW BUSINESS: 6.1 General Plan Conformity Report for FY 2000-2001 Capital Improvement Program Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve a resolution finding that the FY 2000-2001 Capital Improvement Program is in conformance with the General Plan. 7. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: June 13, 2000 Page 2 8. PUBLIC HEARING: 8.1 Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-01, Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-05 Development Review No. 2000-04, Comprehensive Sign Program No. 2000-01 (pursuant to Code Sections 22.58, 22.10.030, 22.42.050 and 080.C., 22.56, 22.48.020.A. and 22.36.060) is a request to construct a one-story restaurant of approximately 2,776 square feet with a patio dining area of approximately 782 square feet and drive-through aisle. The Conditional Use Permit process provides for the review of the drive-through aisle. The Minor Conditional Use Permit provides for the review of the patio dining area. The Development Review process provides for the site design and architectural review. The Comprehensive Sign Program is a request to install a monument sign, two wall signs, menu board and directional signs. Project Address: 21008 Lycoming Street (Lot 7, Parcel A of Tract No. 2166) Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Property Owner: Cathleen Miller 721 Brea Canyon Road, Suite #7, Diamond Bar, CA 91789 Applicant: Farmer Boys Food, Inc. 3435 14th Street, Suite #102, Riverside, CA 92501 Environmental Determination: Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section 15070, the City has determined that a Negative Declaration is required for this project. Negative Declaration No. 2000-02 has been prepared. The Negative Declarations review period begins May 22, 2000, and ends June 10, 2000. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-01, Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-05, Development Review No. 2000-04, Comprehensive Sign Program No. 2000-01, Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval, as listed within the resolution. 9. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS: 10. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 10.1 Public Hearing dates for future projects. 10.2 Industry East Development Project — Response to Draft Environmental Impact Report. June 13, 2000 Page 3 11. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: D-FiMOND BIrx • WW 1►IM i CITY COUNCIL MEETING: 0 0 . I & 11 .4 • 1016105 1kVj I EN 19060 1 :1 yj 9 K14 Thursday, June 15, 2000 — 7:00 p.m. Tuesday, June 20, 2000 — 6:30 p.m. AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Drive Thursday, June 22, 2000 — 7:00 p.m. AQMD Hearing Board Room, 21865 E. Copley Drive Tuesday, June 27, 2000 — 6:00 p.m. AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Drive PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: Tuesday, June 27, 2000 — 7:00 p.m. AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Drive TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING: 12. ADJOURNMENT: Thursday, July 13, 2000 — 7:00 p.m. AQMD Room CC -2, 21865 E. Copley Drive [2RAFT MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR - REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 23, 2000 Chairman Nelson called the meeting to order at 7:10 p.m. in the South Coast Air Quality Management District Headquarters Building Auditorium, 21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissioner Kuo. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Chairman Steve Nelson, Vice Chairman Bob Zirbes, and Commissioners George Kuo, Joe Ruzicka and Steve Tye. Also Present: James DeStefano, Deputy City Manager; Ann Lungu, Associate, Planner; Sonya Joe, Development Services Assistant, and Stella Marquez, Administrative Secretary. 2. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: None offered. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: As presented. 4. - CONSENT CALENDAR: 4.1 Minutes of the May 9, 2000 meeting. C/Ruzicka moved, C/Tye seconded, to approve the minutes of the meeting of May 9, 2000, as presented. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Kuo, Ruzicka, Tye, VC/Zirbes, Chair/Nelson NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None 5. OLD BUSINESS: None 6. NEW BUSINESS: None MAY 23, 2000 PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION 7. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: 7.1 Development Review No. 2000-03, and Variance No. 2000-03 (pursuant to Code Section 22.48.020 and 22.54.010) is a request to construct a two-story single family residence with a basement and five -car garage for a total of approximately 23,000 square feet. The request also includes a tennis court and retaining walls. The Variance request is related to retaining walls of varying height, with a maximum height of 10 feet and decreased setbacks for the tennis court. PROJECT ADDRESS: PROPERTY OWNER/ APPLICANT: 2819 Water Course Drive (Lots 33/46 of Tract No. 47850) Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Diamond Bar West, LLC 3480 Torrance Boulevard, Suite 300 Torrance, CA 90503 AssocP/Lungu presented staff's report. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review No. 2000-03, Variance No. 2000-03, Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. C/Tye asked for clarification of the tennis court 30 foot front yard setback. However, staff's report indicates that the proposed front yard setback is 25 feet from the property line. AssocP/Lungu responded that in this zone, setbacks for residential structures are 30 feet in the front and 10 and 15 feet on the sides. These setbacks are also required for accessory structures (see page 4). The project is 25 feet. DCM/DeStefano explained to C/Kuo that staff's report indicates that a 35 feet height maximum is permitted for residential projects and further discusses a maximum of two stories which is incorrect. The City used to set forth a maximum of two stories. The current Development Code sets a framework of 35 feet (height) for structure with whatever number of livable stories might be included within the space. Therefore, this project complies with the overall height of 35 feet although a portion of it is at three (3) stories. Kurt Nelson, Diamond Bar West LLC, stated that the project follows the varying terrain within the 35 feet height requirement. This tract was approved some time ago as a Vesting Map. Many lots in this tract were designed and graded in conjunction with the old setbacks. This tract had an obligation to preserve at least 40 feet between residential structures and this one is substantially greater than the 40 feet. The retaining wall allows the tennis court to be nestled in. Where it is once MAY 23, 2000 PAGE 3 D..P1 - RR &A Fu- 7 7 PLANNING COMMISSION the mandatory surround and landscaping is in he believes the two -foot difference between the old and new setback requirements would not be visible from the street and adjacent properties. Chair/Nelson opened the public hearing. There was no one present who wished to speak on this matter. Chair/Nelson closed the public hearing. VC/Zirbes congratulated Richard Gould on an impressive structure. He likes the project and has no concerns. He thanked DCM/DeStefano and AssocP/Lungu for their assistance in clarifying the matter of the retaining wall. AssocP/Lungu responded to Chair/Nelson that the landscape plans for the balance of the site are typically done after the buyer moves in. The landscaping for the tennis court will be done prior to move -in. Chair/Nelson asked staff to monitor landscape plans so that they do not include pompous grass because wind blown seeds can be scattered into the SEA. C/Ruzicka moved, VC/Zirbes seconded, to approve Development Review No. 2000-03, Variance No. 2000-03, Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. COMNIISSIONERS: AYES: Kuo, Ruzicka, Tye, VC/Zirbes, Chair/Nelson COMMISSIONERS: NOES: None COMIVIISSIONERS: ABSENT: None 8. PUBLIC HEARING: None 9. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS: - C/Tye thanked staff for the gift presented to the Commissioners. He asked about a location on Torito Lane and Golden Springs Drive formerly known as Millers Video. Half of the location is now occupied by a CPA and half of the site is occupied by a cleaners and would not a cleaners qualify to come before the Planning Commission for a conditional use permit. DCM/DeStefano stated that the old code required a conditional use permit for certain type cleaners. Assuming that it does require some form of discretionary hearing before the Director or Planning Commission, staff would immediately begin code enforcement proceedings to ensure that such a hearing took place and depending on the circumstances either stop the operation or allow the operation some grace period to work with staff while the permit process went to conclusion. According to staff, this business is MAY 23, 2000 PAGE 4 PLANNING COMMISSION a drop off/pick up only site which is different than some that have a small plant on-site. On-site plants require a public hearing. C/Tye stated that over the past four weeks the Commissioners have received correspondence from residents on Washington Street. Even though this is a City of Industry project, would the Planning Commission see this matter for consideration of removing the cul-de-sac to allow the connecting of Washington Street to Grand Avenue. DCM/DeStefano responded that the letters are copies of letters that have been sent to staff and City Council. The letters are a result of the Majestic Project a.k.a. the Industry East Development Project which is a 425 acre development that is being proposed just north of the terminus of Washington Street east of Brea Canyon Road. It is proposed that about 6.6 million square feet of buildings will be constructed on that site. Residents at the end of Washington Street have concerns about losing their vacant land and the agricultural area, and it turning into an industrial park. The area has been zoned Industrial Park for over 40 years. The Industry plans show a connection from Washington Street through the vacant site to Grand.Avenue. The residents are concerned that this will disrupt their quality of life by creating traffic noise and other types of issues. It is the City's position that any connection to Washington Street would require an amendment to the City's General Plana An application for a General Plan amendment would be required to re-classify Washington Street from a cul-de-sac to a through street. A General Plan amendment would require a recommendation from the Planning Commission after conclusion of a public hearing with a final decision from the City Council after their public hearing. The City continues to discuss with the City of Industry that Washington Street should not be connected and should remain a cul-de-sac. C/Tye asked how the City can address setbacks to avoid a mass of buildings on the street. DCM/DeStefano responded that staff attempts to visualize what the street scape might look like in the future within the Code standards and implement standards through the project approvals. A good example is the Pulte project, which determined that there should be a variable front yard setback to eliminate a somewhat canyon effect of houses at the same setback with basically the same architectural pattern on the same street. DCM/DeStefano cited examples of undesirable effects. VC/Zirbes thanked staff and the City for the pen and pencil set. He again thanked AssocP/Lungu for her assistance this afternoon. MAY 23, 2000 PAGE 5 PLANNING COMMISSION 10. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 10.1. Public Hearing dates for future projects - as listed. DCM/DeStefano reiterated the light summer schedule for the Planning Commission. In light of vacations and the light project schedule, the Commission may wish to consider going dark on one regular meeting night. On June 13, the Commission will consider the 2000/2001 Capital improvement Program for General Plan conformity. CSD/Rose and the City's consultant will provide a status report on the development of the City's Parks and Trails MasterPlan toward the end of summer. 11. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: As listed in the agenda. ADJOURNMENT: C/Ruzicka moved, VC/Zirbes seconded, to adjourn the meeting. There being no further business to come before the Planning Commission, Chair/Nelson adjourned the meeting at 8:00 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, James DeStefano Deputy City Manager Attest: Steve Nelson Chairman CITY OF DIAMOND BAR INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM Date: June 13, 2000 To: Chairman and Planning Commissioners From: James DeStefano, Deputy City Man --p 1 Subject: Review of Fiscal Year 2000-2001 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Conformity with the General Plan. The California Government Code requires that the Planning Commission review public works capital improvement projects proposed within the ensuing fiscal year for compliance with the General Plan. The review is necessary prior to City Council adoption of the fiscal year budget. The Fiscal Year 2000-2001 Budget proposes a Capital Improvement Program with an expenditure of $11,516,500 ($11,002,845 City, $513.,655 Redevelopment Agency). The CIP proposes $4,140,000 for street improvements, $915,000 for traffic improvements, $1,135,000 for park and recreation improvements, $4,600,000 for the Community / Senior Center and $726,500 for sidewalk and median improvement projects. The specific list of projects is attached for your review. Funds to support the CIP are received from a variety of sources including the City General Fund, Gasoline taxes, Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA), Proposition "A" and "C" (transportation), Proposition "A" (parks), Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Development Impact Fees, Redevelopment, Lighting and Landscape Assessment District, Park Development, Quimby fees ,FEMA, and others. The CIP has been developed by Community and Development Services Department staff based upon the identified improvement needs for the community. The fist of projects has been reviewed by staff for conformity with the adopted General Plan. The proposed FY 2000-2001 CIP is consistent with the overall Vision Statement and numerous Goals, Objectives, and Strategies contained within the Plan. Memorandum to the Planning Commission June 13, 2000 Page 2 Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2000 -XX finding the proposed FY 2000-2001 CIP.in conformance with the General Plan. Attachments: 1. Draft Resolution 2. Capital Improvement Project 3. 5 Year Slurry Seal Areas Map 4. Excerpt from League of California Cities, Planning Commissioners Handbook. 5. Government Code Section 65401 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 2000 -XX A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR MAKING FINDINGS, PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65401, THAT THE CITY'S FISCAL YEAR 2000-2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) IS CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL. A. Recitals. 1. California Government Code Section 65401 requires the Planning Commission to review proposed public works projects for the ensuing fiscal year to determine compliance with the City's General Plan. 2. On April 18, 1989, the City of Diamond Bar was established as a duly organized municipal corporation of the State of California. 3. On July 25, 1995 the City of Diamond Bar adopted its General Plan incorporating all State mandated elements. 4. The City Manager of the City of Diamond Bar has prepared a proposed Capital Improvement Program and Budget for the City's 2000-2001 Fiscal Year which outlines a program identifying proposed public works improvement projects to occur during the Fiscal Year. The projects include, but are not limited to, street and highway improvements, traffic signal installations and modifications and park improvements. 5. This Planning Commission, on June 13, 2000 at a regularly scheduled meeting, reviewed and discussed the City of Diamond Bar's Fiscal Year 2000-2001 Capital Improvement Program, and the projects contained therein, and concluded said review prior to the adoption of this Resolution. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: 1. This Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the facts and evidence presented during the Planning Commission meeting regarding the City's Fiscal Year 2000-2001 Capital Improvement Program, including oral and documentary evidence provided by City staff, the Commission, in accordance with the provisions of California Government Code Section 65401, hereby finds as follows: (a) The projects identified in the City's proposed Fiscal Year 200-2001 Capital Improvement Program is consistent with the General Plan adopted July 25, 1995; (b) The proposed CIP projects comply with all other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances, regulations, and standards; and (c) The proposed Fiscal Year 2000-2001 Capital Improvement Program is Categorically Exempt, pursuant to Section 15301, from the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder. 3. This Resolution shall serve as the Planning Commission's report to the City Council regarding the General Plan conformity of the proposed public works projects in the City's Fiscal Year 2000-2001 CIP as required by California Government Code Section 65401. 4. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth above, this Planning Commission hereby recommends approval of the Fiscal Year 2000-2001 Capital Improvement Program as proposed which shall conform to Exhibit "A" dated June 9, 2000. The Planning Commission shall: (a) Certify as to the adoption of this Resolution; and (b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution to the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar for use in its deliberations regarding the City's budget. ADOPTED AND APPROVED THIS 13TH DAY OF JUNE, 2000, BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. Steve Nelson, Chairman I, James DeStefano, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of June, 2000, by the following vote to wit: vv - AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAINED: COMNIISSIONERS: James DeStefano, Secretary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C� Cz Cz 0 0 0 0 0 0 COi 07 O 0 q 0 0 q CV q 0 0 0 Ct 0 0 q 0 C� co co 0 (1) U) It to LO Cli 0 0 0 0 q 0 (5 0 0 0 cli N 0 0 0 0 q 0 0q 0q 0 q 0 0 0 0 m 0 LO ()) Cl) m C.) 0 0 00000000 000000 0 q C� q C� q C� Cz 00 0 0 0 0 0 Lf) CO 0 co 0 U') -e N Cl) to Cl) cli Cl) 0 0 0 0 0 0 O C� q 0 LD 0 to 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 Cz q Cz Ci 0 to 00 cr) cli 0 0 0 O 0 IfY 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 O Ci q q q U') 0 0 La Lo co -1 le cq It r_ ti - 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 Cz 0 c 0 o 0 Lo LO E 0 0 2 CL E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0000000000000 0 0 O C� Cz Ct q q q q q q q q 0 0 0 w m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LO U) m M M M N N N 0 '- — — M 0 0 LO q u U') J 2.1 -0 ui mo 0 0 0 0 0 D E >a) wCl) E E U. LL E C, c m E o - u , CC E CL CL 2 m . L) 0 E E — r U) cr M CC ayr m CC I .— t r C — v m c a) x .94 a A_ : -Y 0 .— 0 E 0 0 > 0 0 < 0 x cr E LO Lo CD rD w L) CD r - m 0 0 1 M.X -W c 0 me C ff: M 0 > >.Z(D-m >-Owma)2�E - CMM Q w 0 -j v 9 a -C cc 0>. L) o 0 0 0a) CCI — 0 > Q m CO 0 0 Q =U3 uo F- m c mUC0 m in 0 0 M U o 0 Q Q r > .0 .0 m r - M tm a .0 co 0 cn 0 E c.: mo < m c cL m -M 3 (b U CD to CD 0) ED r, O O O Ln N O O C O O C C O C O l0 lL m N C� N Cl) CL E m m O m m m m C cr, � Y Q � o m � 11 m=Y m c Q m m IL d m c m m 00 E E E m E V vc n CD >'m m T M M d M 'O W m O rn 4m m o o o M W a LO M m CD m O O C O r- 04 U) t OD M1 n U) to m C6 m 0 O 0 O 'o M O O O O O n N Lf) tt W h n 0000 0000 O ID O !!) c —� 0 CD O (D c f— m V: c o W Q O m O p` o X � D a c Um c) ~ F O N } O !- C E H W N o Y of « � m W } a > U. O Q E m LL O O pC O) y > CL n w o $ d F u 0 m N €c p o` O AR :p m C O q OO O C C a O O O O V a Y V O m N c d cL C7 n` � O m N M N CL E m m O m m m m C cr, � Y Q � o m � 11 m=Y m c Q m m IL d m c m m 00 E E E m E V vc n CD >'m m T M M d M 'O W m O rn 4m m o o o M W a LO M m CD m O O C O r- 04 U) t OD M1 n U) to m C6 m 0 O 0 O 'o M O O O O O n N Lf) tt W h n 0000 0000 O ID O !!) 0 CD O (D m � O p` o X c Um c) F O N } ` M U E H `O0 M Y of « � m m 0 O a O Q E m O) y > CL O m cL 3 E E m N J N o` O AR :p m C O d j a m p m M a Y D = d cL C7 n` � O m c W O m O m H U') 5 YEAR SLURRY SEAL AREAS LOCAL STREET MILEAGE CWITY OF DIAMOND BAR PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM February 1998 General Procedures Capital Improvements Prosrammina 121 IV -E. Capital Improvements Programming Capital improvements are a community's long-term investment in its operating systems, including streets, sewers, storm drains, utilities, parks and other facilities. The capital improvements program (CIP) is the multi-year planning mechanism for making those improvements. Since local government can seldom pay for these facilities through its an annual operating budget, numerous techniques have evolved to finance them over a longer period. The total investment, therefore, includes not only the cost of purchase, or design and construction, but also the cost of long-term financing. The capital improvements program is a useful planning tool. The availability of public facilities can serve as a basis for approval or denial of development proposals. In many cases, the costs of public improvements are bome by the private developer and eventually passed through to the home buyer or the commercial/industrial/business user. The capital improvements program is also a valuable implementation tool for carrying out the general plan. Because the general plan establishes policies for the direction, intensity and rate of future growth, the capital improvements program is instrumental in maintaining the local government's control of development. State law requires planning agencies to review property acquisition or disposal for conformity with the general plan. The prioritized list of capital improvements must be flexible to respond to development opportunities, yet must be guided by the long=term benefits that will accrue to the local jurisdiction and its residents. There are four basic steps in developing a capital improvements program: 1. Project identification; 2. Prioritization; 3. Reconciliation; and 4. Adoption. Needed capital improvements should be identified and reliable preliminary cost estimates should be prepared. Once identified, projects should be listed according to need. This listing should include why each project is important and what the consequences will be if it is or is not funded. The next step is to reconcile this prioritized listing into a comprehensive capital improvements program that coordinates improvement scheduling and recognizes the constraints of municipal financing. Finally, the capital improvements program should be formally reviewed and adopted by the local government. League of California Cities Planning Commissioner's Handbook 2000 Article 7. Administration of General Plan 65400. Implementation of plan; annual report After the legislative body has adopted all or part of a general plan, the planning agency shall do both of the following: (a) Investigate and make recommendations to the legislative body regarding reasonable and practical means for implementing the general plan or element of the general plan, so that it will serve as an effective guide for orderly growth and development, preservation and conservation of open -space land and natural resources, and the efficient expenditure of public funds relating to the subjects addressed in the general plan. (b) (1) Provide an annual report to the legislative body, the Office of Planning and Research, and the Department of Housing and Community Development on the status of the plan and progress in its implementation, including the progress in meeting its share of regional housing needs determined pursuant to Section 65584 and local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (c) of Section 65583. (2) The annual report required to be provided to the Office of Planning and Research and the Department of Housing and Community Development pursuant to this subdivision shall be prepared through the use of forms and definitions adopted by the Department of Housing and Community Development pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of, Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 11370) of, and Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 11500) of, Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2). This report shall be provided to the legislative body, the Office of Planning and Research, and the Department of Housing and Community Development on or before July 1 of each year. [Amended, Chapter 796, Statutes of 1998) 65401. Review of public works projects for conformity with plan If a general plan or part thereof has been adopted, within such time as may be fixed by the legislative body, each county or city officer, department, board, or commission, and each governmental body, commission, or board, including the governing body of any special district or school district, whose jurisdiction lies wholly or partially within the county or city, whose functions include recommending, preparing plans for, or constructing, major public works, shall submit to the official agency, as designated by the respective county board of supervisors or city council;'a list bf,the proposed public works recommended for planning, initiation or construction during the ensuing fiscal year. The official agency receiving the list of proposed public works shall list and classify all such recommendations and shall prepare a coordinated program of proposed public works for the ensuing fiscal year. Such coordinated, program shall be submitted to the county or city planning agency for review and report to'said official agency as to conformity with the adopted general*plan or part thereof. 51 City of Diamond Bar PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 8.1 REPORT DATE: May 17, 2000 MEETING DATE: June 13, 2000 CASE/FILE NUMBER: Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-1, Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-05, Development Review No. - 2000 -04 and Comprehensive Sign Program No. 2000-01 APPLICATION REQUEST: To construct a one-story restaurant of approxi- mately 2,776 square feet with patio dining area of approximately 782 square feet and drive-through aisle and install a monument sign, three wall signs, menu board and directional signs. PROJECT LOCATION: 21008 Lycoming Street (Lot 7, Parcel A, Tract No.. 2166) Diamond Bar, CA 91789 PROPERTY OWNER: Cathleen Miller 721 Brea Canyon Road, #7 Diamond Bar, CA 91789 APPLICANT: Farmer 'Boys Food, Inc. 3435 14th Street, #102 Riverside, CA 92501 BACKGROUNDS The property owner, Cathleen Miller and applicant, Farmer Boys Food, Inc. are requesting approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-01, Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-05, Development 11 Review No. 2000-04 and Comprehensive Sign Program No. 2000-01 (pursuant to Code Section 22.58, 22.10.030, 22.42-050, and 080.C., 22.56, 22-48.02.0. A. and 22.36.060). The request is for approval to construction a one-story fast-food restaurant of approximately 2,776 square feet, identified as "Farmer Boys". The restaurant will offer a drive-through aisle for fast food service and patio dinning. The request also includes signage for the project The project site is located at 21008 Lycoming Street (Lot 7, Parcel A of Tract No. 2166), at the corner of Brea Canyon Road. It is a'vacant lot, approximately 35,850 gross square feet (32,450 net square feet) and basically denude of significant vegetation. A storm drain easement (approximately 3,400 square feet) for the Los Angeles County Flood Control District traverses the project site adjacent to the north and east property line. The project site has -a General Plan land use designation of General Commercial (C). Pursuant to the General Plan, this land use designation provides for the establishment of regional, freeway -oriented, and/or community retail and service commercial uses. The proposed restaurant is a service commercial use and is compatible with the General Plan land use designation for the area. The zoning designation for the project site is Restricted Business (C-1). This zoning designation permits a limited range of uses (i.e. retail trade, services, medical uses, restaurants, patio dinning, drive-through services, etc.). The proposed project with the requested uses and appropriate permits is allowed in the C-1 Zone. Generally, the following zones and uses surround the project site: to the north is the Neighborhood Commercial -Billboard Exclusion (C -2 -BE) Zone and the Unlimited Multiple Residence (R-3) Zone; to the south is Restricted Business -Development Plan -Billboard Exclusion (C -1 -DP -BE) Zone and the Pomona (SR 60) Freeway; to the east is the Single Family Residence -minimum Lot Size 6,000 Square Feet (R-1-6,000) Zone; and to the west is the C -1 -DP and Residential -Agricultural (R -A) Zone. In September 1990, the City Council approved a zone change from Light Manufacturing -Development Plan (M -1 -DP) to Restricted Business -Development Plan -Billboard Exclusion (C -1 -DP -BE) for the project area. Also approved at that time was a mixed development that included a three-story hotel, restaurant and mixed retail uses. Although approved, the project was never constructed, but the zone change remains in effect. In January 1995, the Planning Commission approved a two-story office building of approximately 18,000 square feet for the project site, also never constructed.. N ANALYSIS: Development Review The City's Development Code establishes a -Development Review procdss. The purpose of this process is to establish consistency with the General Plan through the promotion of high aesthetic and functional standards to complement and add to the economic, physical, and social character of the City. The process will also ensure that new development and intensification of existing development yields a pleasant living, working, or shopping environment and attracts the interest of residents, workers, shoppers and visitors as the result of consistent exemplary design. Pursuant to the Development Review Section 22.48.020.A.'1 an application for Development Review is required for commercial, industrial and institutional development, which involves the issuance of a building permit for construction or reconstruction of a structure. 'Therefore the proposed project, a commercial development involving the issuance of a building permit requires Development Review. Development Review is within the Planning Commission's review authority. The following is a comparison matrix of the City's minimum required development standards and the proposed project's development standards. City's Required Development Standards Project's Proposed Development Standards + Setbacks: + Setbacks: • Front - 10 ft. landscaped area; 2 Front - 10 ft. landscape area Brea Canyon Road; • Sides - 10 ft. adjacent to 2 Sides - 80 ft. from side/south residential and street side, property line; 10 ft. landscape otherwise none; area north side/Lycoming Street; • Rear - 10 ft. adjacent to 2 Rear - 80 ft.; residential, otherwise none; + Building Height: * Building Height: 2 35 ft.; 20.33 ft.; ♦ Landscaping: + Landscaping: 2 15% min. of site area; 2 17.6% of site area; 2 Trees - 24 -inch box/20% & 2 Trees - 24 -inch box/15% & 15 gallon/80%; 15 gallon/80%; 2 Shrubs - 5 gallon/70% & 2 Shrubs - 5 gallon/70% & 1 gallon/30% 1 gallon/30% 2 Groundcover - 100% coverage in 2 2 Groundcover - 100% coverage in years; 2 years anticipated; ♦ Parking Lot Landscaping: + Parking Lot Landscaping: 2 5% of the gross area of the 2 23.6% of the gross area of the 3 parking lot; o One tree for every eight spaces; ° Landscape planted strip between the street right-of-way and parking equal to setback depth of 7 ft. whichever is more; 4 Screening adjacent to parking either by berm, planting material or masonry wall between 30 and 42 inches and one tree every 20 lineal feet of landscaping; parking lot; 2 5.25 trees required; 23 trees provided; 2 10 ft. wide landscape strip provided; 2 Plant material and 42 inch high masonry wall; o Off -Street Parking: 0 Off -Street Parking: 2 Standard size dimensions - 9 ft. 2 Standard size - 9 ft. by 19 ft. wide by 19 ft. long including which includes two ft. bumper bumper overhang; overhang; 2 Aisle width/travel lane - 26 2 Aisle width/travel lane - 26 ft.; ft.; 2 Restaurant structure - 1 parking 2 Restaurant structure - 2,776 space for every 100 sq. ft. of gross sq. ft. equals 28 parking gross floor area; spaces; 2 Patio dining - 1 parking space 9 Patio dining 7 782 sq. ft. for every 100 sq. ft.; equals 8 parking spaces; 2 Total required parking spaces - 36; 2 Total provided parking spaces - 42; 4 Architectural/Building Materials: Architectural/Building Materials: 2 Code requires compatibility with 2 Compatibility through the area; Mediterranean architectural style utilized in several commercial centers; 2 Architectural style/materials 2 Tile roof - "S" type/Terra Cotta that relate and enhance the color; awnings; stucco; tile community character; wainscoting; roof band/fascia; 2 Architectural treatment shobld 2 Architectural treatment extends extend to all sides of the to all sides of restaurant structure; structure; 2 Sense of balance and proportion; 2 Balance/proportion achieved through building height, roof pitch, awnings, tile wainscoting and varied planes utilized on each elevation; 2 Synergy/connection between 2 Synergy/connection between adjacent sites; project site and existing adjacent RV storage lot will be achieved by shared/common access and parking through reciprocal agreement for this project; The above comparison matrix indicates that the proposed project complies with the City's development standards and design guidelines except that 150 of the trees are 24 -inch box instead of the required 200. 0 Hours of Operation/Number of Employees The applicant proposes that Farmer Boys restaurant will be open to the public Sunday through Thursday from 6:00.a.m. to 10:00 p.m. and Friday and Saturday closing may be extended to 12:00 p.m. The restaurant will be staffed with seven employees on two shifts. However, during the lunch hours (11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.), the number of employees will increase to ten. Product Deliveries Product deliveries will likely occur weekdays before 9:00 a.m. and between 2:00 P.M. and 4:00 p.m. Storm Drain Easement The project site contains a storm drain easement for the Los Angeles County Flood Control District. The easement is approximately 3,400 square foot. it is located adjacent to the north and east property lines. The Lycoming Street project site access will be shared with the Los Angeles County Flood Control District. The District will not allow any construction, parking or landscaping within the easement. According to the District, the easement is active and must remain clear, hence the project's parking and landscaping design. Grading The project site is basically flat. Grading is considered minimal. It is estimated 560 cubic yards of cut and 360 cubic yards of fill will be required to develop this project. Since the cut and fill is minimal and the project site is fairly level, the earthwork is to basically prepare the site for the proposed development. Traffic A traffic impact analysis report is required for this project. The applicant submitted.a traffic study prepared by Darnell and Associates, Inc., dated March 22, 2000: Warren Siecke, the City's traffic engineer, reviewed the traffic study. His comments were incorporated into a revised traffic study dated May 10, 2000, which is acceptable to the City. Pursuant to the traffic study, the proposed restaurant with drive-through service is expected to generate a total of 1,389 average daily trips with 153 trips being generated during the morning peak hour and 130 trips being generated during the afternoon peak hour. As such, the proposed project will not significantly impact any of the intersections in the vicinity of the project site. The intersections analyzed were Brea Canyon -4 Road/Washington Street, Brea Canyon Road/Lycoming Street, Brea Canyon Road/Golden Springs Road, Brea Canyon Road/SR 60 east bound ramp and Brea Canyon Road/SR 60 west bound ramp. The traffic study indicates that the proposed project will not generate enough traffic to lower an acceptable level of service to the intersections analyzed to an unacceptable level of service. The on-site and off-site circulation was reviewed in the traffic study and by the City's traffic engineer.. Site access will occur from one driveway at Brea Canyon Road and one driveway at Lycoming Street. Currently, two driveways exist at Lycoming Street. The driveway closest to the corner will be eliminated. The drive-through will stack seven vehicles. This is typical and expected to be adequate due to the fact that 20 to 25 percent of total sales will result from the drive-through. Additionally, parking space number 43 will be deleted due to its awkward location. It is anticipated that the proposed project will not substantially increase hazards due to design and circulation. Pursuant to the City's traffic engineer, the shared access driveway at the south property line should be widened to at least 26 feet. This project will require the installation of the following public improvements. In order to mitigate traffic flow and ensure safety, the applicant will be required to modify median striping, thereby restricting southbound Brea Canyon Road traffic from making a left turn into the project site. The applicant will also be required to widen the project's Brea Canyon Road driveway to 50 feet and install a landscape median in the middle of the driveway. Widening the driveway will cause the elimination of parking space number 14 and reducing the landscape area on the north side of the driveway. This access point will be utilized for right turn in and right turn out only. The applicant will be required to delete the existing driveway closest to the corner of Brea Canyon Road and Lycoming Street. As a result, the applicant will be required to install sidewalk, curb and gutter in the area. The applicant will also be required to repair damage sidewalk, curb and gutter on Lycoming Street. Additionally, all utilities are required to be installed underground. I Reciprocal Parking and Access Agreement The General Plan encourages the promotion of joint development and the consolidation of individual lots into a coordinated project. This collaboration will assist in maintaining an organized pattern of development and an appearance of unification between sites that will minimize conflict between adjacent sites and ensure development compatibility. To implement the General Plan, the Development Code encourages an applicant to obtain a A shared parking and shared vehicle and pedestrian access (reciprocal parking/access agreement) with adjacent non- residential properties to provide convenience, safety, and efficient circulation. It is required that this reciprocal agreement be recorded in perpetuity by the owners of adjacent properties, thereby guaranteeing the continued availability of shared access and shared parking between the properties. The synergy between the project site and the adjacent recreational vehicle storage site can begin by the two property owners implementing a shared parking and access agreement. The shared'access point would be furnished at the southerly property line. Besides unifying the two sites, the shared parking/access agreement will assist in alleviating traffic on Brea Canyon Road. The applicant will be required to obtain a reciprocal parking/ access agreement with the adjacent property owner. Prior to Certificate of Occupancy, ,the applicant will be asked to make their best effort in attempting to enter into a reciprocal agreement with the adjacent property owner. If not successful, it will be required that the applicant agree to enter into an agreement at a later time agreeable to the adjacent property owner; or when compelled by the City at such time that the adjacent property is improved. Noise The project sit is adjacent to * a major arterial, Brea Canyon Road, and the Pomona (SR60) Freeway. It is not expected that the proposed project will increase the existing noise level (65 CNEL) as referenced in the General Plan for this area. During construction, noise levels are monitored through the permit process that restricts the hours of construction to 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday and requires that equipment be appropriately muffled to reduce noise. It is expected that construction time will be approximately 120 days and an additional 10 to 15 days will be needed to prepare for the grand opening. Parking Lot Lighting Parking areas are required to have lighting capable of providing adequate illumination for security and safety. Lighting fixtures must be energy efficient. Lighting standards must be in scale with the height and use of the on-site structure. All illumination is to be directed downward and shielded away from adjacent properties and..public right-of-way. It is required that a minimum of one footcandle of illumination be maintained at the parking surface throughout the parking area. . Lighting must be on a time -clock or photo -sensor system. 7 The applicant has submitted a lighting plan/study for the City's review and approval. Light fixtures are approximately 25 feet tall, as measured from and including the base to top of the fixture. Lighting will be operated by a photo -sensor system. The proposed illumination will provide a minimum of one footcandle to the parking surface throughout the parking area. Lighting is directed downward, but appears to extend beyond the property lines and into the public right-of-way. The applicant will be required to shield the lighting in a manner that does not provide lighting beyond the project site. Trash Enclosure A trash/recycle bin enclosure is provided adjacent to the south property line and parking space number 20. Applicant is required to submit a detail of the enclosure for the City's review and. approval. Pursuant to the City's Design Guidelines, it is required that the enclosure be designed, constructed of materials and utilize colors that match the restaurant structure. A trellis structure is required to screen the top view of the enclosure. Landscaping will be required to surround the enclosure on three sides. Landscaping/Irrigation The applicant has provided a conceptual landscape plan. As referenced in the comparison matrix, this plan complies with the Development Code's required landscape standards except for the required 20% 24 -inch box trees (15% is proposed). Pursuant to the Los Angeles County Flood Control District, their easement must remain clear at all times. As a result, landscaping and irrigation will not be installed in this area. The landscape. plan indicates that proposed trees, which are on the subject property and border the sidewalk will be designated by the City. The City's parks and recreation director has indicated that Canary Island Pines could be considered due to the fact that this specie will continue the tree theme for the area. However, the City is willing to consider an alternative species or combination of species. The applicant is required to submit a final landscape/irrigation plan for the City's review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. The landscape plan shall include designation of Canary Island Pines or other City specified species, 20% of the tree provided in 24 -inch box size and shrubs and vines to surround the trash enclosure. Additionally, the proposed project is required to comply with the City's established Water Efficient Landscape Regulations and will be plan checked accordingly. N Conditional Use Permit/Minor Conditional Use Permit The purpose of a Conditional Use Permit and a Minor Conditional Use Permit is to provide a process for reviewing specified activities and uses identified in a zoning district whose effect on the surrounding area cannot be determined before being . proposed for a particular location. Therefore, the review will include location, design, configuration and potential impacts to ensure that the proposed used will protect the pubic health, safety and welfare. Pursuant to Table 2-6 of the City's Development Code, a restaurant is permitted in the C-1 zone by right. Drive-through sales are permitted in the C-1 zone with a Conditional Use Permit. Therefore, a restaurant with a drive-through aisle requires a Conditional Use Permit approval. Additionally, the Table indicates that a restaurant with outdoor/patio dining is. permitted in the C-1 zone with a minor Conditional Use Permit. The proposed project is a fast-food restaurant with a drive- through aisle and patio dining, hence the Conditional Use Permit and Minor Conditional Use Permit. A Conditional Use Permit is within the Planning Commission's review authority. A Minor Conditional Use Permit is within the Director's review authority. In this case, all reviews are presented to the highest authority, which is the Planning Commission. Drive -Through Aisle Pursuant to the Development Code, a drive -though aisle is required to have a minimum 12 -foot width. The exit point must be at least 50 feet from an intersection. Direction of traffic flow is required to be clearly identified. The site plan indicates that the drive aisle is 12.5 feet wide. The exit point is 150 feet from the intersection. The Comprehensive Sign Program, discussed below, indicates that directional signs will clearly identify traffic flow. As required by Code, the drive aisle will be appropriately screen by a 42 -inch high masonry wall with planting materials in front of the wall. The drive aisle location, queuing, accesses points and circulation have been reviewed by the City's traffic engineer and deemed appropriate. Pursuant to Code, the applicant will be required to provide enhanced paving, for the City's review and approval, where pedestrian walkways intersect the drive-through aisle. Patio Dining Outdoor dining and seating area is proposed adjacent to the north elevation of the restaurant structure. The area is approximately 780 square feet surrounded by a 36 to 42 inch high wall, enhanced with tile utilized for the restaurant structure's wainscoting. The area will accommodate six tables and be accessible from Wei inside the restaurant. It is required that waste receptacles for public and restaurant employees be provide. Patio furniture, umbrellas and waste receptacles must be compatible with the overall design of the restaurant structure. The applicant is encouraged to utilize potted plants to enhance the pedestrian experience. The applicant will be required to submit patio lighting for the City's review and approval. Pursuant to Code, the Minor Conditional Use Permit for outdoor dining and seating areas are subject to review after one year, at which time the Director shall conduct a study to determine if adverse impacts have resulted from the use. If adverse impacts are not found, then apermanent Minor Conditional Use Permit may be granted. Comprehensive Sign Program The purpose of a Comprehensive Sign Program is to integrate a project's signs* with the structure's design to achieve a unified architectural statement. A Comprehensive Sign Program provides a means for flexibility when applying sign regulations.for multi - tenant projects and users of multiple signs. The Program encourages creativity and provides incentive and latitude in the provision of multiple signs while achieving and not circumventing the intent of Development Code Chapter 22.36 related to sign standards. The applications for this project also include a request for a Comprehensive Sign Program. Pursuant to Development Code Section 22.36.060, a Comprehensive Sign Program is required whenever five or more signs are proposed for a new or existing development. The applicant is proposing three wall signs, four directional signs, monument sign and menu board with speaker. The application request includes a total of nine signs for a new development and therefore, requires approval of a Comprehensive Sign Program. The following is a comparison matrix of the City's sign standards and the project's proposed sign standards. City's Sign Standards Project's Proposed Sign Standards Monument Sign: 0 Monument Sign: Height - max. 6 ft.; 2 Height - max. 6 -ft.; Sign Area - max. 32 sq. ft. per 2 Sign Area - 32 sq. ft. with Brea sign with 200 ft; or more street Canyon Rd. street frontage of frontage; 200 ft.; 2 Setback - min. 10 ft. from 2 Setback - 5 ft. from property property lines or ultimate line; right-of-way and shall not block traffic safety area; 2 may be illuminated; 2 Internally illuminated; 2 Address numerals min. 3 in. 2 Not shown; height and area 4 sq. ft.; Lul The I proposed signs are architecturally compatible with the design of the restaurant structure. The design and copy of the wall signs mimic the monument sign's design. Sign colors are compatible with the color palette of the restaurant structure. The proposed signs comply with the City's sign standards primarily. In order to comply completely with the required standards, the applicant will be required to add Arabic address numerals to the monument sign base and change the color of the base, thereby matching the restaurant color; locate the monument an additional five feet from the property line for a total of ten feet; and reduce the menu board height by three inches, thereby not exceeding the required six foot height. A speaker will be contained inside the menu board. The speaker will produce a sound level of 54 dBA at 32 feet, 60 dBA at 16 feet, 66 dBA at eight feet, etc. In this case, 54 dBA will occur at about one-third of the way into the sidewalk. Everyday sounds normally range from 30 dBA (very quiet) to 100 dBA (very loud). Fifty-five dBA would be similar to normal conversation at five feet. Fifty dBA would be similar to.typical daytime suburban background. The noise level in the Brea Canyon Road/Lycoming Street area is estimated at 65 dBA. Additionally, when ambient noise levels naturally decrease at night, the speaker will automatically reduce the outbound volume. As a result, the speaker will produce a sound level of 36 dBA at 16 feet, 42 dBA at eight feet, etc. As a result, it is not expected that the 11 ♦ Wall Sign: ♦ Wall Signs: e one located on the north, west 2 One per building frontage; and east building frontage; 2 1.25 sq. ft. of sign area/linear 2 32 sq. ft. for each wall sign; ft. of building frontage; 2 Max. total - 96 sq. ft.; 2 Max. 125 sq. ft. per use; 2 Location.- below edge of roof 2 Location - below edge of roof within what could represent a within sign band area if sign band area and does not than 80% of sign band provided and not cover more than cover more 80% of sign band area; area; 2 may be illuminated; sInternally illuminated; ♦ Directional Sign: ♦ Directional Signs: 2 Height - max. 4 ft.; 2 Height - 1.5 ft.; 2 Area - max. 6 sq. ft.; 2 Quantity - not specified; 2 Area - 3.24 sq. ft.; 2 Quantity - four, three "drive- through" and one "do not enter"; 2 may be illuminated; 2 Internally illuminated; ♦ Menu Board: 0 Menu Board: 2 Height - max. 6 ft.; 2 Height - 6.25 ft.; 2 Area - not specified; 2 Area - 38.8 sq. ft.; 2 Location - within a landscaped 2 Location - within a landscaped area; area; 2 Max. two per restaurant; 2 One proposed; The I proposed signs are architecturally compatible with the design of the restaurant structure. The design and copy of the wall signs mimic the monument sign's design. Sign colors are compatible with the color palette of the restaurant structure. The proposed signs comply with the City's sign standards primarily. In order to comply completely with the required standards, the applicant will be required to add Arabic address numerals to the monument sign base and change the color of the base, thereby matching the restaurant color; locate the monument an additional five feet from the property line for a total of ten feet; and reduce the menu board height by three inches, thereby not exceeding the required six foot height. A speaker will be contained inside the menu board. The speaker will produce a sound level of 54 dBA at 32 feet, 60 dBA at 16 feet, 66 dBA at eight feet, etc. In this case, 54 dBA will occur at about one-third of the way into the sidewalk. Everyday sounds normally range from 30 dBA (very quiet) to 100 dBA (very loud). Fifty-five dBA would be similar to normal conversation at five feet. Fifty dBA would be similar to.typical daytime suburban background. The noise level in the Brea Canyon Road/Lycoming Street area is estimated at 65 dBA. Additionally, when ambient noise levels naturally decrease at night, the speaker will automatically reduce the outbound volume. As a result, the speaker will produce a sound level of 36 dBA at 16 feet, 42 dBA at eight feet, etc. As a result, it is not expected that the 11 noise level emitted by the menu board will have an impact on the existing area noise level. Review by other Departments The City's Public Works and Building and Safety Divisions and the Los Angeles County Fire Department reviewed this project. Their recommendations will be within the draft resolution. Conclusion Staff believes this project as present and with the conditions of approval in the draft resolution is appropriate for the subject site and will benefit the City. The architectural style is compatible with and will maintain the character of the surrounding area. Construction materials utilized are low maintenance and will remain aesthetically appealing while providing texture, and color. Furthermore, the proposed project will bring revenue into the City. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City has determined that a Negative Declaration is required for this project. According to CEQA Section 15070, Negative Declaration No. 2000-02 has been prepared. The Negative Declaration's review period begins May 22, 2000 and ends June 10, 2000. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: Notice for this project was published in the Inland Valley Bulletinand the San Gabriel Valley Tribune on May 22, 2000. Public hearing notices were mailed to approximately 310 property owners.within a 500 -foot radius of the project site on May 15,* 2000. Furthermore, the project site was posted with a display board on May 22, 2000 and the public notice was posted in three. public places on May 18, 2000. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-01, Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-05, Development Review No. 2000-04, Comprehensive Sign Program No. 2000-01, Negative Declaration No. 2000-02, Findings of Fact and conditions of approval as listed with in the attached resolution. 12 REQUIRED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS: 1. The proposed use is allowed within the subject zoning district with the approval of a Conditional Use permit/Minor Conditional Use Permit and complies with all other applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Municipal Code; 2. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plant 3. The design, location, size and operation characteristics of the proposed use are compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity; 4. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of use being proposed including access, provision of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses and the absence of physical constraints; 5. Granting the Conditional Use Permit/Minor Conditional Use Permit will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity and zoning district in which the property is located; and 6. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). REQUIRED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FINDINGS: 1. The design and layout of the proposed development are consistent with the General Plan, City Design Guidelines, development standards of the applicable district, and architectural criteria for special areas, (e.g. theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards, or planned developments); 2. The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future development, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards; 3. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the characteristics of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain and enhance the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by Chapter 13 22.48 of the City's Development Code, the General Plan, or any applicable specific plan; 4. The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, and color that will remain aesthetically appealing; 5., The proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious (e,.g. negative affect on property values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 6. The proposed project ha's been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). REQUIRED COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PROGRAM FINDINGS: 1. The Comprehensive Sign Program satisfies the purpose of Chapter 22.36 and the intent of this Section 22.36.060; 2. The signs enhance the overall development, are in harmony with, and are visually related to other signs included in the Comprehensive Sign Program and to the structure and/or uses they identify, and to surrounding development; 3. The Comprehensive Sign Program accommodates future revisions which may be required due to changes in uses or tenants; and 4. The Comprehensive Sign Program complies with the standards of Chapter 22.36 except that flexibility is allowed with regard to sign area, number, location, and/or height to the extent that the Comprehensive Sign Program will enhance the overall development and will more fully accomplish the purposes of Chapter 22.36. Prepared by: As—*ciate Planner M Attachments: 1. Draft Resolution; 2 Negative Declaration No. 2000-02; 3 Exhibit "A" - site plan, floor plan, elevations, landscape/irrigation plan, lighting plan and colors/materials board dated June 13, 2000; and 4 Applications. 15 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION No. 2000 -XX A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2000-01, MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2000-05, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO - 2000 -04, COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PROGRAM No. 2000-01 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2000-02, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A 2,776 SQUARE FOOT, ONE-STORY RESTAURANT IDENTIFIED AS FARMER BOYS WITH A DRIVE-THROUGH AISLE AND A 782 SQUARE FOOT OUTDOOR DINING. ADDITIONALLY, THE REQUEST INCLUDES THE INSTALLATION OF ONE MONUMENT SIGN, THREE WALL SIGNS, ONE MENU BOARD AND DIRECTIONAL SIGNS- The PROJECT SITE IS LOCATED AT 21008 LYCOMING STREET (LOT 7, PARCEL A, TRACT NO. 2166) DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA. A.RECITALS. 1. The property owner, Cathleen Miller and applicant, Farmer Boys Food, Inc. have filed an application for Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-01, Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-05, Development Review No. 2000-04, Comprehensive Sign Program No. 2000-01 and Negative Declaration No. 2000-01 for a property located at 21008 Lycoming Street, Diamond Bar, Los Angeles County, California. Hereinafter ,in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit, Minor Use Permit, Development Review, Comprehensive Sign Program and Negative Declaration shall be referred to as the "Application". 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar on June 13,2000 conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Application. .3. Notification of the public hearing for this project was provided in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers on May 22, 2000. Public hearing notices were mailed to approximately 310 property owners of record within a 500 -foot radius of the project on May 15, 2000. Furthermore, the project site was posted with a display board on May 22, 2000 and the public notice was posted in three public places on May 18, 2000. H B.Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: 1. This Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2 The Planning Commission hereby finds that the Initial Study review and Negative Declaration No. 2000-02 have been prepared by the City of Diamond Bar in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970 and guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15070. Furthermore, Negative Declaration No. 2000-02 reflects the independent judgement of the City of Diamond Bar. 3 The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds and determines that, having considered the record as a whole including the findings set forth below, and changes and alterations which have been incorporated into and conditioned upon the proposed project set forth in the application, there is no evidence before this Planning Commission that the project proposed herein will have the potential of an adverse effect on wild life resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Based upon substantial evidence, this Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effects contained in Section 753.5 (d) of,Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 4. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein, this 'Planning Commission hereby finds as follows: (a) The project relates to vacant lot located on the southeast corner of Brea Canyon Road and Lycoming Street. The project site is approximately 35,850 gross square feet and approximately 32,450 net square feet. A storm drain easement for the Los Angeles County Flood Control District traverses the project site adjacent to the north and east property lines. Additionally, the site is denude of significant vegetation. (b) The project site has a General Plan land use designation General Commercial (C). Pursuant to the General Plan, this land use designation provides for regional, freeway oriented, and/or community retail and service commercial uses. The proposed restaurant is a service commercial use. (c) The zoning designation for the project site is Restricted Business (C-1) . This zoning designation permits a limited range of uses (i.e., retail trade, services medical uses, restaurants, outdoor patio dining, drive- through services, etc.) 0 (d) Generally, the following zones and uses su -d the project site: to the north is the Neig4'ood,441 Ala, Commercial -Billboard Exclusion (C -2 -BE) Zone 'Itz to the S*Outg Unlimited Multiple Residence (R-3) Zone; *6 Restricted Business -Development Plan -Billboard Exclusion (C -1 -DP -BE) Zone and the Pomona (SR 60) Freeway; to the east is the Single Family Residence -Minimum Lot Size 6,000 Square Feet (R-1-6,000) Zone; and to the west is the C -1 -DP and Residential -Agricultural (R -A) Zone. (e) The application request is to construct a one-story restaurant of approximately 2,776 square feet with a drive-through aisle and outdoor patio dining area of approximately 782 --square feet. The application request also includes three wall signs, one monument sign, one menu board and directional signs. Conditional Use Permit/Minor Conditional Use Permit (g) The proposed use is allowed within the subject zoning district with the approval of a Conditional Use permit/Minor Conditional Use Permit and complies with all other applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Municipal Code; Pursuant to Table 2-6 of the City's Development Code, a restaurant is permitted in the C-1 zone by right. Drive- through sales are permitted in the C-1 zone with a Conditional Use Permit. Therefore, a restaurant with a drive-through aisle requires a Conditional Use Permit approval. Additionally, the Table indicates that a restaurant with outdoor/patio dining is permitted in the C-1zone with a Minor Conditional Use Permit. The pro . posed project is a restaurant with a drive-through. aisle and patio dining; hence the Conditional Use Permit and Minor Conditional . Use Permit approval. As conditioned, the proposed uses will comply with all other applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Municipal Code. (h) The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan; The project site has a General Plan land use designation of General Commercial (C). Pursuant to the General Plan, this land use designation provides for the establishment of regional, freeway -oriented, and/or community retail and service commercial uses. The proposed restaurant is a service commercial use and is consistent with the General Plan land use designation for the area. A specific plan does not exist for the project site or area. 3 The design, location, size and operation characteristics of the proposed use are co4lblq with the existing and future land uses in the The proposed project is located within the C-1 zone.i This zone allows for restaurant with a drive-through aisle and outdoor patio dining with the appropriate permits. All new development within in this zone must meet the minimum standards set forth in the Development Code related to height, setbacks, parking, landscaping, architecture and operational characteristics. The proposed project, as conditioned, will meet the prescribed minimum standards and in some instances will exceed the minimum standards. As a result, the proposed project's design, location, size and operational characteristics, as conditioned, will be compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity. (j) The subject site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of use being proposed including access, provision of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses and the absence of physical constraints; As referenced above in Item (i), the proposed project meets or exceeds the required development standards for the C-1 zone. As such, is compatible with adjoining land uses. To ensure further compatibility with the adjacent commercial property to the south, the applicant will be required to provide a common vehicular and pedestrian access point and reciprocal parking between the properties. The City Engineer and the City's Public Works Division have reviewed the project's traffic study and application and visited the project site. This review included access, on and off site circulation and traffic improvement measures. The traffic study is acceptable to the City and with the conditioned traffic improvement measures, it is anticipated that the subject site will be physically suitable for the proposed project. Provisions for utilities exist for the project site. (k) Granting the Conditional Use Permit/Minor Conditional Use Permit will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety- 'convenience, or welfare, or injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity and zoning district in which the property is located; As referenced above in Items (g) through (i), the proposed project, as conditioned, will meet or exceeds the City's minimum development standards. Traffic, on 0 and off site circulation, parking and the total sign of the proposed project, as conditioned, is excep*ted by the City. With the issuance of the appropriate permits, it is expected that granting.the Conditional,-,"', Use Permit/Minor Conditional Use Permit will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity and zoning district in which the property is located. (1) The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City has determined that a Negative Declaration is required for this project. According to CEQA Section 15070, Negative Declaration No. 2000-02 has been prepared. The Negative Declaration's review period begins May 22, 2000 and ends June 10, 2000. Development Review (m) The design and layout of the proposed development are consistent with the General Plan, City Design Guidelines, development standards of the applicable district, and architectural criteria for special areas, (e.g. theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards, or planned developments); The proposed project is consistent with ' the General Plan land use designation for the subject site. It is consistent with the objectives and strategies of the General Plan in that the proposed project will bring revenue into the City; provide a service commercial use; provide the opportunity to promote joint development with the adjacent commercial site, thereby assisting in an organized pattern of development; and enhance pedestrian activity. The proposed project is consistent with the applicable zoning district development standards related to height, setbacks, landscaping and parking. It maintains or exceeds the required minimum development standards. The proposed project is consistent with the City's Design Guidelines because the materials and colors are compatible with the surrounding area and other commercial development within the City; the architectural elements extend to all sides of the restaurant structure; the restaurant structure achieves 5 balance and proportion through building heightS--'rb9,bf pitch, awnings, wainscoting and varied elevationq1,.-*j planes; and encourages pedestrian activity.' Therefore, the design and layout of the proposed development are consistent with the General Plan, Cit Design Guidelines, development standards of the applicable district. Additionally, a specified architectural criteria for the area does not exist. (n) The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring .existing or future develo-pment, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards; The design and layout of the proposed project has been reviewed related to use compatibility and traffic or pedestrian hazards. As conditioned and referenced in Items (g) through (n) above, it is expected that the design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future development, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. (o) The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the characteristics of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain and enhance the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22.48 of the City's Development Code, the General Plan, or any applicable specific plan; As referenced in Item (m) above, the architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the characteristics of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain and enhance the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22.48 of the City's Development Code, the General Plan, or any applicable specific plan. (p) The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, and color that will remain aesthetically appealing; As referenced above in Item (m) and the use of "S" type roof tile, awnings, stucco, glazed ceramic wainscoting tile, it is expected that the design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its .5 neighbors through good aesthetic use of mater texture, and color that will remain aesthetica appealing. (q) The proposed development will not be detrimental to"t 7 public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious (e.g. negative affect on property values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity; Before the issuance of any City permits, the proposed project is required to comply with all conditions within the approved resolution and the Building and Safety Division, Planning Division, Public Works Division, Health Department, Sheriff Department, Fire Department and South Coast Air Quality Management District requirements. The referenced agencies involve will ensure that the proposed project is not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious (e.g. negative affect on property values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity; Comprehensive Sign Program (r) The Comprehensive Sign Program satisfies the purpose of Chapter 22.36 and the intent of this Section 22.36.060; The purpose of a Comprehensive Sign Program is to integrate a project's signs with the structure's design to achieve a unified *architectural statement. A Comprehensive Sign Program provides a means for flexibility when applying sign regulations for multi - tenant projects and users of multiple signs. The Program encourages creativity and provides incentive and latitude in the provision of multiple signs while achieving and not circumventing the intent of Development Code Chapter 22.36 related to sign standards. The proposed signs satisfies the purpose of the City's sign standards and the intent of Comprehensive Sign Program because all signs, as conditioned, comply with all development standards for signs. The signs will clearly and concisely identify the use and direct the patrons to and on-site in a safe manner. The proposed signs are architecturally compatible with the design of the restaurant structure. The design and copy of the wall signs mimic the monument sign's design. Sign colors are compatible with the color palette of the restaurant structure. (s) The signs enhance the overall development, are in harmony with, and are visually related to other signs F& included in the Comprehensive Sign Program and t64--th6�, structure and/or uses they identify, and to surrouft',!in development; The proposed signs will enhance the overall development because they are architecturally compatible with the design of the restaurant structure. The proposed signs are in harmony with, and visually related to each other in that the design and copy of the wall signs mimic the monument sign's design and sign colors are compatible with the color palette of the restaurant structure. Additionally, the proposed signs are compatible in size, color and design with other signs utilized in nearby commercial developments. (t) The Comprehensive Sign Program accommodates future revisions which may be required due to changes in uses or tenants; Through the Comprehensive Sign Program minor future revisions to the Program are allowed with the Director's approval. Major revisions require the approval of the Planning Commission. However, sign revisions due to new tenant or use are permit by the Development Code. (u) The Comprehensive Sign Program complies with the standards of Chapter 22.36 except that flexibility is allowed with regard to sign area, number, location, and/or height to the extent that the Comprehensive Sign Program will enhance the overall development and will more fully accomplish the purposes of Chapter 22.36; As referenced above in Items (r) through (t) above, The Comprehensive Sign Program complies with the standards of Chapter 22.36 except that flexibility is allowed with regard to sign area, number, location, and/or height to the extent that the Comprehensive Sign Program will enhance the overall development and will more fully accomplish the purposes of Chapter 22.36; 5. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth above, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Application subject to the following conditions: (a) The project shall substantially conform to a site plan, floor plan, elevation, roof plan, grading plan, final landscape/irrigation plan, and final exterior and parking lot lighting plan/study and sign plans collectively labeled as Exhibit "A" dated June 13, 2000, as submitted, amended herein and approved by the Planning Commission. L -*1 The site shall be maintained in a condition which.is free of debris both during and after the construction, addition, or implementation of the -.--,.- entitlement granted herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether during or subsequent to construction shall be done only by the property owner, applicant or by a duly permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste from residential, commercial, construction, and industrial areas within the City. It shall be the applicant's obligation to insure that the waste contractor utilized has obtained permits from the City of Diamond Bar to provide such services. (c) Prior to the issuance of any City permits, the applicant shall submit a final landscape/irrigation plan for the City's review and approval. Said plan shall: (1) Delineate that 20% of the required amount of trees will be in 24 -inch box size; (2) Delineate the shrubs/vines that shall surround the trash/recycle bin enclosure; (3) Delineate the tree species or combination of tree species that will be.located adjacent to the sidewalk bordering Brea Canyon Road and Lycoming Street; (4) Comply with the City's Water Efficiency Landscape Regulations; and (5) Said landscaping and irrigation shall be installed prior to the Planning Division final inspection.or issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. (d) Prior to the issuance of any City permits, the applicant shall.submit a final lighting plan/study for the City's review and approval that delineates the following: (1) Lighting within the outdoor patio dining area; and (2) Shielding method utilized to ensure that lighting is directed downward and does not extend beyond the property lines and into the public right-of-way. (e) Prior to the issuance of any City permits, the applicant shall submit a trash/recycle bin detail delineating design, construction material, colors and overhead trellis for the City's review and approval. The design, construction materials and colors shall match the restaurant structure. 0J Prior to the issuance of any City permits, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan for the City's review and approval that delineates the enhanced pavement for the pedestrian walkways that intersect the drive-through aisle. (g) Applicant shall comply with the City's noise standards. (h) The outdoor patio dining area shall be cleaned on a continual basis for the removal of litter and food items that constitute a nuisance to public health and safety. Additionally, the outdoor patio dining area shall contain waste receptacles for use by the public and/or restaurant employees. Furthermore, the patio furniture including umbrellas and waste receptacles shall be compatible with the overall design of the restaurant structure and shall be reviewed and approved by the City. (i) Prior to construction, the applicant shall install temporary construction fencing pursuant to the Building and Safety Division's requirements along the project perimeter. (j) Hours of operation shall be Sunday through Saturday from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. On Friday and Saturday, the applicant shall have the option to extend the hours of operation to 12:00 midnight. (k) The parking lot, vehicle maneuvering areas, driveways, landscape areas and hardscape areas shall be kept and maintained in a manner that does not detract from the appearance of surrounding properties and protects the health, safety and welfare of the patron, employees and general public. Any graffiti shall be removed within 48 hours of its appearance or upon notification by the property owner/applicant. (1) All mechanical equipment shall be screened from public view. (m) The applicant shall submit a revised site plan locating the monument sign at least 10 feet from the property line. ' Arabic address numerals shall be added to the base of the monuments. Said numeral shall be a minimum of three inches high and four square feet in area. The base of the monument sign shall be a color that matches the stucco color of the restaurant structure. (n) The menu board shall not exceed a height of six feet. 10 (o) Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupanci-',_.the applicant shall exercise its best efforts to conclude a reciprocal parking/access agreement w the adjacent property owner (RV storage site). The purpose of this agreement is to: provide convenient, safe and efficient circulation by interrelating the two properties into a coordinated project; maintain an organized pattern of development; ensure compatibility between the properties; and alleviate traffic on Brea Canyon Road. The agreement will provide the adjoining property owners with the right to access, park and generally traverse each other's property for the purpose of conducting business. Should these efforts fail, the applicant shall, upon presentation by the City, enter into such an agreement at any such time thereafter as the adjacent property owner agrees or is compelled by City conditionto do likewise. Said agreement shall be in perpetuity and recorded. (p) Prior to the issuance of any City permits, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan, for the City's review and approval. The revise site plan shall delineate the following: (1) Shared access driveway at the south property line shall be minimum width of 26 feet; (2) Parking space number 43, due to its awkward location, shall be deleted; (3) The Brea Canyon Road driveway shall be widen 50 feet, parking space number 14 shall be eliminated and a landscape median shall be installed in the middle of the driveway to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and (4) Landscaping on the north and south side of the driveway shall be reduced to accommodate the 50 -foot drive way Width. (q) The Brea Canyon Road driveway shall be utilized for right turn in and right turn out only and shall be identified as such to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. (r) Prior to the issuance of any City permits, the applicant shall prepare a striping plan for the modification of the median on Brea Canyon Road to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and pay for the cost of the striping modification. Said striping modification shall be installed prior to final inspection or Certificate of Occupancy. ,(s) I The applicant shall remove the.existing driveway closest to the corner of Brea Canyon Road and 11 Lycoming Street. The applicant shall obtAin-an encroachment permit to install sidewalk, curb and,.. gutter in this area. The applicant shall also repair damage sidewalk, curb and gutter on Lycoming Street. Additionally, the applicant shall upgrade existing wheelchair ramp to current standards. All said improvements shall be completed prior to final inspection or Certificate of Occupancy. (t) All utilities shall be installed underground. (u) No loitering shall be permitted on any property adjacent to the project site under control of the applicant. (v) Prior to the issuance of City permits, the applicant shall submit a drainage plan for the City's review and approval. Drainage plan may be incorporated into thegrading plan. (w) The applicant shall be responsible for acquiring the appropriate industrial waste permits with Los Angeles County. Additionally, the applicant shall conform to the NPDES requirements for food waste disposal and Health Department requirements for food service. (x) Applicant shall comply with State Handicap Accessibility Regulations (i.e., van parking, shortest route to accessible entrance, shortest pedestrian route to the closest pedestrian entrance, restrooms, ramps, handicap signs at each entry, path of travel not exceeding two percent, etc.). (y) Plans shall conform to State and Local Building Code (i.e. 1997 Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, uniform mechanical Code, 1996 National Electrical Code and State Energy Code) requirements and Fire Department requirements. (z) Construction plans shall be engineered to meet wind loads of 80 M.P.H. with a "C" exposure. (aa) This grant is valid for two years and shall be exercised (i.e. construction started) within that period or this grant shall expire. However pursuant to Code Section 22.42.080.C.5., Minor Conditional No. 2000-05 for outdoor patio dining and seating shall be subject to a review after one year, at which time the Director shall conduct a study to determine if adverse impacts have resulted from the said use. If adverse impacts are not found, a permanent Minor Conditional Use Permit may be granted. A one-year extension -of time for this application may be approved when submitted to the 12 City in writing at least 60 days prior to the*, expiration date. The Planning Commission will consider the extension request at a duly noticed public hearing in accordance with Chapter 22.72 of the City of Diamond Bar Development Code. (bb) This grant shall not be effective for any purpose until the permittee and owner of the property involved (if other than the permittee) have filed, within fifteen (15) days of approval of this grant, at the City of Diamond Bar Community and Development Services Department, their affidavit stating that they are aware of and agree to accept all the conditions of this grant. Further, this grant shall not be effective until the permittee pays remaining City processing fees, school fees and fees for the review of submitted reports. (cc) If the Department of Fish and Game determines that Fish and Game Code Section tion 711.4 applies to the approval of this project, then the applicant shall remit to the City, within five days of this grant's approval, a cashier's check of $25.00 for a documentary handling fee in connection with Fish and Game Code requirements. Furthermore, if this project is not exempt from a filing fee imposed because the project has more than a deminimis impact on fish and wildlife, the applicant shall also pay ,to the Department of Fish and Game any such fee and any fine which the Department determines to be owed. The Planning Commission shall: (a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and (b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, to: Cathleen Miller, 721 Brea Canyon Road, #7, Diamond Bar, CA and Farmer Boys Food, Inc., 3235 14th Street, Riverside, CA 92501. APPROVED AND ADOPTED'THIS 13TH OF JUNE 2000, BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. FI -Ya Steve Nelson, Chairman I, James DeStefano, Planning Commission that the foregoing Resolution was duly by the Planning Commission of the City meeting of the Planning Commission held by the following vote: 13 Secretary, do hereby certify introduced, passed, and adopted of Diamond Bar, at a regular on the 13th day of June 2000, ATTEST: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: James DeStefano, Secretary 14 .�10,Mill BF I: CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & DE IMMANT SERVICES `' IPlanning Vivrjjg B A R 21660 E. Copley Drive Suite 190; Diamond'Bar, CA 91765 (909)396-5676 Fax (909)861-3117 CONDITIYNAL 'USE PERMIT APPUCATION wt, tit o tz C o N ta-t i-, I-- S S E p I- p- a r 1 Record Owner Applicant Name (Last name ) (LAA .name first) c Address '7'7 % �. 8�� t fl yr�i � 7 �' a o�� oZ cit, . j �. r�i. % Pi-05EtV c..¢ -- .Lp 01Wq qZ poi Phone( ) goct T lD� Phone v 1/-11' q1? 00 Fax ( ) 90q S -q 7 - 7Wr Fax qoe 7i' 7s-- / Casc s 0- (. � -0 1 FPL � ,2�e - f L� — Deposit S �/ v e _ Rccnpt # B.• _ Date Recd FoR crn, usE Applicant's Agent AJ-VAIZ6Z (bast name fust) ivq7- 1 t2otoi-fe I Aver 101. Phon 961- 3 Fac ` Z,- 96 7— fX23 NOTE: It is the applicant's responsibility to notify the City in writing of any change of 'the principals involved during the - processing of this case. (Attach separate sheet, if necessary, including names, addresses, and signatures of members of partnerships, joint ventures, and directors of corporations.) Consent -1 ce fy that Ithe owner of the herein described property and permit the applicant ]file thri request 41A Sieved t0 (All record owners) Certification: I, the undersigned, hereby certify underpenalty ofperjury that the information herein provided is correct to the best of my knowledge. Print Name h•a'tzf(xtke P. i..VN?.C— 2 (Applicant or Agent) Signed `' (/( Date (Applicant or Agent) Location L- C Om r&�-- (Street address or tract and lot number) Zoning House Numbering Map III If 3 �5 a Previous Cases Dr. Present Use of Sitey A C ti' l Use applied for -JJ'/ VLu- . City of Diamond Bar _ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Page Two Project Size (gross acres) !1 L/ = Project Density Previous Cases Present Use of Site for (,1.12 t -o T !U l 7 r%y-11)r-04-9w— Domestic Water Source Company/Distda Method of Sewage Disposal Sanitation District Grading of Lots by Applicant? YES NO Amount (Show necessary grading design on site plan or tent. map) 1.1 Parking: T Total Standard Landscaping: Sq. feet Grading: Y `� N If yes, Quantity: Cut: A7 i;"I Compact 2 Handicap import: Y N _ If yes, Quantity:. Export: Y _ N If yes, Quantity: * Occupant Load as calculated by the Building & Safety Division is required for all dining, take-out or assembly use, churches, health clubs, theaters, etc. LEGAL DESCRIPTION (all ownership comprising the proposed lots)/parcel(s) Area devoted to structures 2 '� �• Landscaping/Open spacesz# Residential Project: and (gross area) (No. of lots) Proposed density (Units/Acres) Parking Required Provided Standard `f'. / Compact ' Handicapped Total 2 Conditional Use Permit Burden of Proof - Page 2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMrr BURDEN OF PROOF In addition to the information required in the application, the applicant shall substantiate to the satisfaction of the Planning Commission, the following facts: (answers must be full & complete) A. That the requested use at the location proposed will not: 1. Adversely affect the health, peace, comfort or welfare of persons residing or working in the surrounding area, or 2. Be materially detrimental to the use, enjoyment or valuation of property of other persons located in the vicinity of the site, or 3. Jeopardize, endanger or otherwise constitute a menace to the public health. safety or gencral.welfare. The proposed project, creates no pollution or toxic substances that will affect neighboring properties; it is regulated by the health departmeRt ot tlie city or to tts —operational standards -so it does noticreate any health or safety issues. It will enhance t -He- comfort of nelg1113ortrig residents by providing them a place to eat and relax close by. B. That the proposed site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, landscaping and other development features prescribed in this Title 22, or as is otherwise required in order to integrate said use with the uses in the surrounding area. The project will be built to or exceed current code requirements as to all above issues of title 22. C That the proposed site is adequately served: I By highways or streets of sufficient width and improved as necessary to carry the kind and quan tity of traffic such use would generate, and 9 0 1CFfCT Jfrj+6 GWgXs-cLjL1V A-ke 2. By other public or private service facilities as are required. Theproject has adeguate traffic circulation both on site and offsite; the surrounding properties will be enhariped, because there will be less traveling across the freeway from people that want to use a restaurant. t IM7' ;AL STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE (to be completed by applicant) A. GENERAL INFORMATION Project Applicant (Owner): rvov NAME 14'x, 97t�n2. ADDRESS CzIUe-V-Si Staff Use Project No. Project Representative: ALv 2 r,76-5,100 &tuyia s, 17-rf. r NAME to9Z'T w� 1 kV67, ` ADDRES g �'77g gC?0D 9yq- 275- 9430 90- 3W;- 5-0-~ 6`L- 15-Z3 PHONEY FAX# PHONE# FAX# 1. Action requested and project description: �• u ' (o ruse V i? -1 V6 *ZGt_ lZt�0-C W ► -t "b ��-tut✓ Tl -I i2w . 2. Street location of project: ��t�"� ' S �'! �J& 3. Present use of site: U) A IAOT L-oT 4. Previous use of site or structures: 5. Project Description ' 1 ' a. Site Size (total area) © L b. Square Footage (coveted by structures, paving , C. Number of floors of construction ' d. Amount of off-street parking provided C. Landscaping, open space f. Propose scheduling / g. Associated projects _ It. Anticipated incremental development biisial Study Qua iamaire - Page 1 ti i. if residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes (range of sale prices or rents and type of household size expected) j. If commercial, indicate the type, whether nciAborh city or regionally oriented. square footage of sales at a and loading facilities. ��f� i� l�D'-V" l�rib s .t t-i�?4A--),F w / jj-� (] (Z1 ��lii /RU.4- k. ' If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities 1. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy. loading facilities. and community benefits to be derived from the project. in. If the project involves a variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state this and indicate clearly Why the application is required. 6. Please list all previous cases (if any) related to this project: 7. List related permit/approvals required. Specify type and granting agency. 8. Are you planning future phases of this project? Y N If yes, explain: 9. Present zoning: C 10. Water and sewer service: Initial Study Questionnaire - Page 2 Domestic Public Water Sewers Does service exist at site? Y ZN _ Y V N _ If yes, do purveyors have capacity to meet demand of project and all other approved Projects? Y kl' N _ Initial Study Questionnaire - Page 2 y If domestic water or public sewers are not available, how will these services be provided? 11. Residential Projects: a. Number and type of units: b. Floor area of each unit: C. Number of floors _ d. Schools: What school district(s) serves the property? " Are existing school facilities adequate to meet project needs? YES NO If not, what provisions will be made for additional classrooms? 12. Non-residential projects: (commercial, industrial, institutional) l a. Distance to -nearest residential use or sensitive use (school, hospital, etc.) ( 0 - b. Number and floor area of buildings: ► -7 i , FT. C.. Number of employees and shifts: / Z d. Maximum employees per shift: � e. Operating hours: Z �� --r f. Community benefit to be derived from project: �- � 12 202V P0O 2 40-A V.2 Q LLkb I T Y --;7 15;P016,6 g. Identify any: End products Waste products Means of disposal It. Do project operations use; store or produce hazardous substances such as oil, pesticides, chemicals, paints, or radioactive materials? YES NO If yes, explain Initial Study Quaatamaim - Pape 3 i. Do your operations require any pressurized tanks? YES NO If yes, explain j. Identify any flammable, reactive or explosive materials to be located on-site. X10. - k. Will delivery or shipment trucks travel through residential area to reach the nearest highway? YES NO If yes, explain 13. Associated Projects D --t © hJ 14. Anticipated incremental developmento� 15. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes ' 16. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage / of sales area and loading facilities. 17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities - 18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. hiWat Study Quest o=ite - Page 4 ' B. ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION (to be completed by applicant) 1. Environmental Setting --Project Site a. Existinguse/structures 1�Ct(�'"'�^'� Lo b. Topography/slopes *c. Vegetation *d. Animals *e. Watercourses cel t r��G 1 f. Cultural/historical resources g. Other 2. Environmental Setting--- Surrounding Area a. Existing uses structures (types, densities): b. Topography/slopes *c. Vegetation YJ004-'- *d. Animals 0 - 7e Jo initial Study Quatiatmaire - Page S .AL "e. Watercourses t �� �►�'. f. Cultural/historicalresourees ' g. Other * Answers are not required. if the area does not contain natural, undeveloped land. 3. Are there any major trees on the site, including oak trees, walnut trees, sycamore, California pepper and arroyo willow? YES NO _ -L If yes, type and number: 4. Will any natural watercourses, saiface flow patterns, etc., be changed through project development?: YES NO c If yes, explain: 5. Grading: Will the project require grading? YES NO If yes, how many cubic yards? Will it be balanced on-site? YES NO If not balanced, where will dirt be obtained or deposited? 6. Are there any identifiable landslides or other major geologic hazards on the property (including uneompacted fill)? YES NO � If yes, explain: 7. Is the property located within a high fire hazard area (hillsides with moderately dense vegetation)? YES NO Distance to nearest fine station: Initial Suidy Queatiamaim - Page 6 8. Noise: ` _ at sift• ��� G Existing noise sources Noise or vibration to be generated by project: 9. Fumes: , r Odors generated by project: �Jo Could toxic fumes be generated? 10. Dust: Dust, ash, or smoke generated by project: 11. what energy -conserving designs or material will be used? I tj t7 tj A�f a L w I"s a CERTIFICATION: I hereby certi4, that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. 0( 00Date signature For: Initial Study Qualiamaire - Page 7 'WH �T"�i�. -Yr. • 1 CrrY OF DIAMOND BAR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 21660 E. Copley Drive Suite 190 (909)396-5676 Fax (909)861-3117 P,EC£1l%.-r DEVELOPMENT RE VIEW APPLICATION 11 Y 0 r 0! A'� 0 N 0 8 A R !`-� _. �..,UG.. r yU �. Record Owner Name 47 /-' C-ft•'.�� (Last name fust) Applicant case# .,�,�. FPL' # ' ao —/ Deposit $ 44 Goo. Receipt# ki— e f—fD By Date Rec'd '00 MAR 28 P 1 :01 , (Last name first) Address72- I .S • &&F 6e.170 14 %0 L cityD['Cmei-J, r,C4 Zip '?/ /d f Phone 6f�� PhoneV DJ 27S ` q 9Do Applicant s Agent l&LVlkO-62 p�i(dO (Last name first) r; -(I CAe Phone— NOTE: It is the applicant's responsibility to notify the Community Development Director in writing of any change of the principals involved during the processing of this case. (Attach a separate sheet, if necessary, including names, addresses, and signatures of members of partnerships, joint ventures, and directors of corporations.) Consent: I c fy that 1 a t e owner of the herein descnbed'property and permit the applica to $his request. Signed Date Zfzk /t� (All ICCOrd OWI1Cf5) Certification: I, the undersigned, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information herein provided is correct to the best of my knowledge. Print Name 15 i J PQ LLE F- : AL ( /tae Z (Applicant or gent � 2 Signed Date oy` - 00 (Applicant o Agent Location ,,1 LQQb g (Street address or Zoning 4::�:; _' Previous Cases and lot number) Present Use of Site VA ( - CB���61AY d- ` r t`7 Use ap�plieLd for _ ' �r! ,�'tl.�-0`I � [.0 ! � (�(� i (%e Legal description (ail ownership comprising the PrOPOsed 10t(s)/Parcel(s)) .11 RA Area devoted to structures ! & r 1 , Landscaping/Open space Project Size � �r � 0 Lot Coverage Proposed density (Units/Acres) Style of Architecture Number of Floors Proposed Slope of Roof r l� Grading -,/ f"!5 If yes, Quantity Cut Import Export I If yes, Quantity If yes, Quantity Fill . ; CITY OF hLAMOND BAR Cased c COMf.1 uNr, DEVELopmiENT DEPARTMENT FPL # a —,( 21660 E. Copley Drive Suite 190 Deposit S �00• - (909)396-5676 Fax (909)861-3117 P, _ C Receipt/! pL 0 £��c DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATIOg l l Y G F D i A- i D N D E A R By .;. DG.. t4G't. Date Recd Record Owner Applicant '00 MAR 28 P Applicant's Agent Name (Iasi name first) (Last name first) (Last name first) Address%2 1_57, (art li-�G4�04� �o�`�'� 14774 — (� r��, l� City�lCtYY '>.cl. �e�,C4 7 �'i06t-s1r2E C44 SDS PhonR6E ��� PhoneVD Z 767- C7 900 lvg27 Phon4 -- NOTE: It is the applicant's responsibility to notify the Community Development Director in writing of any change of the principals involved during the processing of this case. - (Attach a separate sheet, if necessary, including names, addresses, and signatures of members of partnerships, joint ventures, and directors of corporations.) Coney Signed owner of the herein described propenry and permit the amficapt to file �this request. %,&60 Date 0o (All record owners) _ Certification; I, the undersigned, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information herein provided is correct to the best of my knowledge. Print Name P P0, LLE t-: AL ()/tae z (Applicant orgent . Signed aL,6—, Date o23- Z#-- 00 (Applicant o Agent Location (Street address or and lot number) Zonings-� Previous Cases Present Use of Site Use applied for _ l :{/ NX, e961 �� d ' t Pe5_! A_t•— T_ p / t f t C *)R 1 i% e . I t'1 milt. Legal description (all ownership comprising the proposed lot(s)/parcel(s)) rRAv,-T Go7- 7, .P-9061. "'Q Area devoted to structures ` 1 oma? i t spa Landscaping/open ce Project Size ?&1'590 qi• Lot Coverage Proposed density Style of Architecture (Units/Acres) Number of Floors Proposed Proposed Slope of Roof r 141T Grading:__ ti'S If yes, Quantity Cut Fill Import If yes, Quantity. Export If yes, Quantity 0 FROM PHONE NO. Apr • T v .t.. = CITY O)! DIAMOND BAR DEPARTMENT OF COKKUkrTYdt-DEVELOPMBNTSERVICES Planning Division bei 1 eyve iuo 190. Diamond Bar. CA 91765 �( OW96t-5 Pu (909)$61-3117 COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PROGRAM APPLICATION use tIvzw -0I FPLN� ttf Deposit S Receipt N� By Date Recd _ sort CM LSE Record Owner Applicant Applicant's Agent =n— -R M� �'f r_>6T -rC , L�r�, � i� ►Fig- Lc (�i ; . t cane cleat (Last same fins) (Last name fent) ) Address S_,.�✓ DI? � ��f � org �' ATL 14Z �If T7 _— city Zip go Phon 4. _)h Photteg0? �7S "/ q o Phone(l Fax � J r Fax (�DS� � Fax NOTE: It is the applicant's responsibility to notify the City in writing of any change of the principals involved during the processing of this case. (Attach separate sheet, if necessary: including names, addresses, and signatntu of membcm of pattncnhips, joint ventures, and directors of corporations.) Consent: I cethat I am the ow r 4f the herein described property and permit the appilcant to file this r uest. Signed t,D��J-/1%&- Dat. -- �3 (All mcord owners) CertTication: 1, the undersigned, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information herein_provtded Is correct to the best of my knowledge. Print Name 6-t4iz' Ql�i F. ALvArzel�__ - - (Ao � Signed t 4,r. -"t'''` Date (Applicant of QMW (street satirett or tract and lot number) betwand (Strad) (Strad) Zoning C ' 1 P '- i3 1% Howe Numbering Map / 3 List number, size and type of skp(s) nquested. (Example: 2 - 8' x 9' Freestanding, double faced signs - 6 R. high I - 3' x 24' Wali sign) --' � ` X" ,� / S/�/ .moo Gam' �A �� G'Gi��l i7 Sl ��✓.S / /� %f�Ciyl� /GG6%•H/�✓.�''TED X k /x ti i� o�3Cc= :�' « �,�•: Li.� i,..�.,/, �,�av�t/r'�c'it/i'' S-tel>�✓ AP /JF " a'' 2� '" Z7v�l3` N` iPGGt ln//''f.Id�r/1' /�Lg7i�/i+/•� ?//i�G7lli.✓.t¢L 5'ili� _ % -'� •� i 3 a � � / � � X ,�s .� `' /� / �•�l«jC /G!f L!M /N � � NG! S/� st/. s. A FROM PHONE NO. Apr. 19 2000 02:42PM 03 City of Diamond Bar COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PROGRAM APPLICATION Pase Two Length of lot frontage(s). if freestanding or roof sign(s) If roof sign, height of building A Z 2, � Length of building (space occupicd) f outagc. if wall sign (o ! • 6 NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2000-02 for CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2000-01 MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2000-05 and DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 2000-04 City of Diamond Bar 21660 E. Copley Drive, Suite 190 DIAMOND BAR, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CA 91765 Environmental Finding Initial Study (Environmental Information and Environmental Checklist) May 19, 2000 NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2000-02 Project Description and Location CITY OF .DIAMOND BAR ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM FOR INITIAL STUDY Pursuant to Guidelines for California Environmental Quality Act §15063 (f), this form, along' with the Environmental Information Form completed by the applicant, meets the requirements for an Initial Study. This form is comprised of five parts: Part 1 Background Part 2 Summary of Environmental Factors Potentially Affected Part 3 Determination Part 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Part 5 Discussion of Environmental Impacts PART 1 - BACKGROUND r 1. City Project Number: Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-01/Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2000- 05/Development Review No 2000-04/Comprehensive Sign Program No. 2000- 01 2. Project Address/Location: 21008 Lycoming Street (Lot 7, Parcel A of Tract No. 2166), Diamond Bar CA 91789 3. Date of Environmental Information Form submittal: April 14, 2000 4. Applicant: Farmer Boys Food Inc Address: 3235 14th Street Suite # 102 City/State/Zip: Riverside CA 92501 Phone: (909) 275-9900 Fax: (909)275-9930 5. Property Owner: Cathleen Miller Address: 721 Brea Canyon Road, Suite # 7 City/State/Zip: Diamond Bar CA 91789 Phone: (909) 594-6966 Fax: (909) 594-4995 D:\ANN\NEO DECS\CUP2000-01.ND.DOC 5/9/00 1 6. Lead Agency: City of Diamond Bar Contact: Ann J. Lungu, Associate Planner Address: 21660 E. Copley Drive, Suite 190 City/State/Zip: Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Phone:* (909) 396-5676 Fax: (909) 861-3117 7. General Plan Designation: General Commercial (C - Max. 1.0 FAR) 8. Zoning: Restricted Business (C- 1) Zone 9. Description of Project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off-site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary). The application is a request to construct a one-story restaurant of approximately 2,776 square feet with an outdoor patio dining area of approximately 782 square feet and drive- through isle. The project applications include Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-01 that provides for the review of the drive-through isle. Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-05 that provides for the review of the outdoor patio dining. Development Review No. 2000-04 that provides for site design and architectural review. All three application requests require a public hearing. The applications also include Comprehensive Sign Program No. 2000-01 for the installation of one monument sign, one menu board, two wall signs and directional signs. This application does not require'a public hearing. However, pursuant to the City's Development Code all applications will be processed at the same time and before the highest review authority. For this restaurant project, the highest review authority is the Planning Commission. The project site is located on the corner of Lycoming Street and Brea Canyon Road. It is approximately 35,850 gross square feet (32,450 net square feet) in area and contains a storm drain easement for the Los Angeles County Flood Control District. The easement is approximately 3,400 square feet and is located adjacent to a portion of the north and east property line. A portion of five parking spaces, a portion of the access from Lycoming Street and a portion of the landscaping are proposed within this easement. The applicant is required to obtain approval from the Los Angeles County Flood Control District for said development within the storm drain easement. The proposed fast-food restaurant's hours of operation will be Sunday through Thursday. 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. and Friday and Saturday closing may extend to 12:00 p.m. The restaurant will be staffed with seven employees on two shifts. However, during the lunch hours (11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.), the number of employees will increase to 10. D:\ANN\NEG DECS\CUP2000-OI.ND.DOC 5/9/00 It is anticipated that the drive-through business will generate 20 to 25 percent of the total sales. 10. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Briefly describe the project's surroundings: Generally, the following zones and land uses surround the proposed project: to the north is the Neighborhood Commercial -Billboard Exclusion (C -2 -BE) Zone and the Unlimited Multiple (R-3) Zone which consists of an Arco service station and condominiums respectively; to the south and adjacent to the project site is the Restricted Business - Development Plan -Billboard Exclusion (C -1 -DP -BE) Zone which consists of a recreational vehicle storage facility and the Pomona (60) Freeway; to the west is the C -1 -DP and Residential -Agricultural (R -A) Zones which consists of a child day care center and single family residences respectively; and to the east is the Single Family Residence -Minimum Lot Size 6,000 Square Feet (R-1-6,000) Zone and the Los Angeles County Flood Control District's 30 foot wide easement which includes the channel which traverses a portion o the project site adjacent to the north and east property lines and separates the project site from the residences to the east. 11. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement.): None. 12. List City of Diamond Bar related applications for this project that must be processed simultaneously: Listed above in Item No. 1. 13. List prior projects for this parcel: Zone Change No. 90-028/ approved and Development Review No. 94-2/ approved for an office building but never constructed. D:\ANN\NEG DEMCUP2000-01ND. DOC 5/9/00 3 SEE MAP NO 114 H 333 T R N 0 32554 . SWAN SUBDIVISION _ zoo :� NN TR NO 30637 M B 3 - 39 - 40 k »L. (n z . $ % MB 869 - 42 - 44 N 2 3 , S P Ir 1./. (0— r < o -y » S 121 -NIS '� 223 J y J yl ;ar b MB '� 22 21 20 9 IG I7 IG IS is 13 m - m - ••• 22-4 20 - r _ 22 1 2 3 4 5916 T 8 9 10 it 1� r ••• [ M B 9 5 1 9 '• 1 0 0" !rRR xzx:: _ • t _ t• s t9 R y t l.YtOYip• yrs. uw rn■ n gg , rn• a»s ... - t rr .•. i ,e.o slu I' i �'-E ■ I>` • $ ■■iti tt7MC - NIYI p . sua'uV 1 i e it 's 6 TR N IO 23 [ r sns �r. its, a - tIETOCCS B-2870 •m Ieo A B i C t d N; Of SEC 17 /f a E d P R d: e i Y �� •r n t i 8 it i • ) 6 5 • 3 Z i T2S R9W 2 3 + 9 7 • 9 10 If .,g .r �i 32 33 3. 3S 36 37 30 g 13 14 IS I6 17 IB 19 20 ,� G g n. w •e 2. 27 26 2S 24 23 22 2 f t tn _ q f L 22 23 - , R S t 5. .�' R R i AOIRTYA WTOR t 1} J » aN • S O4CCE55 EASE ®O a DRY 4 • VIERgal su - Y M +•o a [i su7 �, 6 g r•.H A n r.�+ 'Y Y V »'�rI 9•s.� ; ';y 3 0 _ YBi.. .Y V b r•7 1,„9r, V •t. R=.. 'Y N Y •• 1924Alf .YA , •�' '� , I- _6 _^ •1' r h '•' .r �' r Y, Z .re � •' < .+ 9 � 97 � •+• � � 79 N r' D ..• % +)' '�• 'N •1• V ' .ya ••. p2'.16C IFIR Al f [ [My •iR `"` ; .» ' S 3• sl sz s] 1i , , + s GO aG •s t•7 .,,,, + Ns9s i• + . A 2 30 29 zo o a a \ : 50 6 Z2 ret ■a�> g • + ca t aJ 9 ' r fRRoopl- y •a ,� wJ , C a�+ i► ,s i\ o = 9 e S, i Y 4791 y5 m 733 2a ' P� t\ [•+ elr 4 �.+ of x 6 •+' t M 24 E t S y j•+ 2 Z m1011A a a W •OI ccN403• 136 u la E E ' n * E5 s1 rri .r• :.. .- .��.\ ;�+� s d 2 �. -`e�g_•s� _, ::•13• it T R N 0 10 ii » g • 4 . e� '� t r G R i i xR � �,��. 45 + 4� e o 1 't t R q t + _ - : • ' N)1 ■ 3 i3 2 rJ / w• * t' �s'• m aad t G p 8 i = , ♦ 135 r �' Y u' IS i� a*. V ®tS�J =° N a a ®Pt :. i t 9 '•'+ r,s,,..rs acs• 1 •. ',r. :•. 16 d .••i:.'t, n. o k G5 tii, Ja 1' 18 IT IG "l P' .n1 + 91 9z 93 94 l.a �' Nn ' �$ •, z0 2z 23 N _ - - 1 137 '' .» 19 „ •! 90 _ ,._n JO 8 sv�a` ; �Yr r• vo z10 : • - ^ A :I Na, a 95 or • s qq E '. R pll sP ` '.• n + s JOG /o, -°.y[+i�e � � ]7 a• ..f23 n. s+ f� 4[ ti[IIWOID r __ .r °, us *' ,S ..e R 4 * ! »65 +:.•Ea 51 ],». .,•24 p'� R S • R '" ` TI Jt 0D e ]y... .Y o +1. .s �• t R lrn o s " i r o X71 :.cz ao • az iz3 124 fs ' \\ dp .ta U ., a2 t � r j7••. ,� � , .rS! 42 r' .r28 0 .r _ n 12T 12G 125 .f /0 ° 4i Q1 u •' +i a . •" yM' • = a• ^ e. t R r o ME � d �� •+ .N ♦ r +'• e , � � S r• •4 a•7".nJ2 a+�J i�' � w31 0 s•• e + u �i "• 1�E s0�'ilp t ••• ? .e• tY •„ep p J �, • '•° . + ,` .« 6]",: i! .»• i\y ..• 4 ►J''•4�� .0 a u• .. - r i i a e w, Q * r ` t' i o •�. v 1 ». »75 = .r.53 . H • n •r• •~ ; 1]3 X34 .» � .• ' / � .N + ®� .y. 7 "MY'»� ` •"fit 49»' 1`.r36 � .» � 131 132 44 O P *, ,•+E .N 7•' `+tt 1 '• Q' 133 tL t0• 107 10G w • '• - l �• .s. n �( if •u •" w \� [ 4� '•' r .rS 111 p0109 t E i;: .• fi 0 49 ~• • 1 *� 4S m Y iN 6, JO Jl T2 73 7a .M JG .. w_ e : * t .•e aE1r DR = '4 r r,, r a 4G ••7 64 K' •T 6• G E °O4q m KIf r• 'a . d+A » ,` •]i r' E t t 6 1 t ^i>i 'rr ^ « �' : » r 47 ' - • - a A Y •-w' �.i • an YtL» 43 42 ` H �• s• el - •8024 P M 99 - 3 - 4 LOT 1 95 2'9-139 IfT -PR' •9 . ) 6 5 • 311 1 IO 9 21 25 26 27 26 29 3011132 12 Ill - r sns �r. its, a - tIETOCCS B-2870 •m Ieo A B i C t d N; Of SEC 17 /f a E d P R d: e i Y �� •r n t i 8 it i • ) 6 5 • 3 Z i T2S R9W 2 3 + 9 7 • 9 10 If .,g .r �i 32 33 3. 3S 36 37 30 g 13 14 IS I6 17 IB 19 20 ,� G g n. w •e 2. 27 26 2S 24 23 22 2 f t tn _ q f L 22 23 - , R S t 5. .�' R R i AOIRTYA WTOR t 1} J » aN • S O4CCE55 EASE ®O a DRY 4 • VIERgal su - Y M +•o a [i su7 �, 6 g r•.H A n r.�+ 'Y Y V »'�rI 9•s.� ; ';y 3 0 _ YBi.. .Y V b r•7 1,„9r, V •t. R=.. 'Y N Y •• 1924Alf .YA , •�' '� , I- _6 _^ •1' r h '•' .r �' r Y, Z .re � •' < .+ 9 � 97 � •+• � � 79 N r' D ..• % +)' '�• 'N •1• V ' .ya ••. p2'.16C IFIR Al f [ [My •iR `"` ; .» ' S 3• sl sz s] 1i , , + s GO aG •s t•7 .,,,, + Ns9s i• + . A 2 30 29 zo o a a \ : 50 6 Z2 ret ■a�> g • + ca t aJ 9 ' r fRRoopl- y •a ,� wJ , C a�+ i► ,s i\ o = 9 e S, i Y 4791 y5 m 733 2a ' P� t\ [•+ elr 4 �.+ of x 6 •+' t M 24 E t S y j•+ 2 Z m1011A a a W •OI ccN403• 136 u la E E ' n * E5 s1 rri .r• :.. .- .��.\ ;�+� s d 2 �. -`e�g_•s� _, ::•13• it T R N 0 10 ii » g • 4 . e� '� t r G R i i xR � �,��. 45 + 4� e o 1 't t R q t + _ - : • ' N)1 ■ 3 i3 2 rJ / w• * t' �s'• m aad t G p 8 i = , ♦ 135 r �' Y u' IS i� a*. V ®tS�J =° N a a ®Pt :. i t 9 '•'+ r,s,,..rs acs• 1 •. ',r. :•. 16 d .••i:.'t, n. o k G5 tii, Ja 1' 18 IT IG "l P' .n1 + 91 9z 93 94 l.a �' Nn ' �$ •, z0 2z 23 N _ - - 1 137 '' .» 19 „ •! 90 _ ,._n JO 8 sv�a` ; �Yr r• vo z10 : • - ^ A :I Na, a 95 or • s qq E '. R pll sP ` '.• n + s JOG /o, -°.y[+i�e � � ]7 a• ..f23 n. s+ f� 4[ ti[IIWOID r __ .r °, us *' ,S ..e R 4 * ! »65 +:.•Ea 51 ],». .,•24 p'� R S • R '" ` TI Jt 0D e ]y... .Y o +1. .s �• t R lrn o s " i r o X71 :.cz ao • az iz3 124 fs ' \\ dp .ta U ., a2 t � r j7••. ,� � , .rS! 42 r' .r28 0 .r _ n 12T 12G 125 .f /0 ° 4i Q1 u •' +i a . •" yM' • = a• ^ e. t R r o ME � d �� •+ .N ♦ r +'• e , � � S r• •4 a•7".nJ2 a+�J i�' � w31 0 s•• e + u �i "• 1�E s0�'ilp t ••• ? .e• tY •„ep p J �, • '•° . + ,` .« 6]",: i! .»• i\y ..• 4 ►J''•4�� .0 a u• .. - r i i a e w, Q * r ` t' i o •�. v 1 ». »75 = .r.53 . H • n •r• •~ ; 1]3 X34 .» � .• ' / � .N + ®� .y. 7 "MY'»� ` •"fit 49»' 1`.r36 � .» � 131 132 44 O P *, ,•+E .N 7•' `+tt 1 '• Q' 133 tL t0• 107 10G w • '• - l �• .s. n �( if •u •" w \� [ 4� '•' r .rS 111 p0109 t E i;: .• fi 0 49 ~• • 1 *� 4S m Y iN 6, JO Jl T2 73 7a .M JG .. w_ e : * t .•e aE1r DR = '4 r r,, r a 4G ••7 64 K' •T 6• G E °O4q m KIf r• 'a . d+A » ,` •]i r' E t t 6 1 t ^i>i 'rr ^ « �' : » r 47 ' - • - a A Y •-w' �.i • an YtL» 43 42 ` H �• s• el - •8024 P M 99 - 3 - 4 LOT 1 95 PART 2 - SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. 1. Land Use and Planning _ 9. Hazards _ 2. , Population and Housing _ 10. Noise _ 3. Geologic Problems. _ 11. Public Services _ 4. Water _ 12. Utilities & Service Systgms _ 5. Air Quality _ 13. Aesthetics _ 6. Transportation/ Circulation _ 14. Cultural Resources _ 7. Biological Resources 15. Recreation _ 8. Energy & Mineral 16. Mandatory Findings Resources _ of Significance _ D:\ANN\NEG DEMCUPZ000.01.ND. DOC 5/9/00 4 PART 3 - DETERMINATION To be completed by Lead Agency On the basis of this initial evaluation: Project Numbers: CUP 2000-01/MCUP 2000-05 DR 2000-04/CSP 2000-01 I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. X I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the MITIGATION MEASURES described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" OR "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant.effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. re Ann J. Lungu. Printed Name D:\ANN\NEG DECS\CUP2000-01.ND. DOC 5/9/00 5 May 19, 2000 Date • y H t1i H F1 N C) Fl 0 c Fli om m x K. N c-r rr O O O O N 1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except . " No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis) 2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4. "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an affect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant Impact." The lead agency must described the mitigation measures and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced). 5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063 (c)(3)(D). Earlier analyses are discussed in Section SVH at the end of the checklist. 6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impact (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. D:\ANN\NEG DECS\CUP2000-01.ND.DGC 5/9/00 6 18. .EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used here, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analyses. C) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. " describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. D:IANNINEG DECSICUP2000-01.ND. DOC 5/9/00 7 Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Significant Unless Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated I ' PLAWG, LAND,,USE AND... n� a. Conflict with General Plan designation or zoning?, Source #s: General Plan, I-11 & 27; City of Diamond Bar Development Code, Title X 22, p. II -7, 21 & 22, C-1 Zone; b. Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project: Source #s: General Plan, p. III- X 10 et seq.; Development Code, III -149; c. Be incompatible with existing land uses in the vicinity? Source #s: General Plan, I-11 & 27; City of Diamond Bar Development Code, Title X 22, p. II -7, 21 & 22, C-1 Zone; d. Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? Source #s: MEA, II -E X 1-16; e. Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including a low= income or minority community)? Source #s: Project site plan; General Plan, I-1 et seq., II -1 X et seq.; City of Diamond Bar Development Code, Title 22; p. II -7, 21 & 22, C-1 Zone; Existing Conditions - a. The project site is located within the General Plan land use designation area of General Commercial (C -Max. 1.0 FAR) . This land use designation provides opportunity for regional, freeway oriented and/or community retail and service commercial uses.. The proposed restaurant project with a drive- through aisle and outdoor patio dining is considered a service commercial use. Therefore, the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan's land use designation for the project area. The project site is zoned Restricted Business (C-1). This zone allows for a limited variety of uses. A restaurant is permitted by right. A drive-through aisle is permitted with an approved Conditional Use Permit and outdoor patio dining is permitted with an approved Minor Conditional Use Permit. b. The proposed project does not conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by the City of Diamond Bar or other agencies with jurisdiction over this project. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan's land use designation for the project site. The proposed project has been reviewed purusant to CEQA requirements. Furthermore, the project site is a vacant lot, surrounded by development and denude of vegetation. I c. The project site is surrounded by the following zones and land uses:to the north is the Neighborhood Commercial -Billboard Exclusion (C -2 -BE). Zone and the Unlirruited Multiple (R-3) Zone which consists of an Arco service station and condominiums respectively; to the south and adjacent to the project site is the Restricted Business -Development Plan -Billboard Exclusion (CI -DP -BE) Zone which consists of a recreational. vehicle storage facility and the Pomona (60) Freeway; to the west is C-l'DP and Residential -Agricultural (R A) Zones which consists of a child day care center and single family residences respectively; and to the east is the Single Family Residence -Minimum Lot Size 6,000 Square Feet (R-1-6,000) Zone and the Los Angeles County Flood Control District's 30 foot wide easement which includes the channel which traverses a portion of the project site adjacent and east property lines and separates the project site from the residences to the east. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan land use designation and zoning designation. The Minor Conditional Use Permit and Conditional Use Permit will ensure that the proposed project will protect the public health, safety and welfare. Additionally, the proposed restaurant will service the businesses and residences in the area. d. There are no agricultural resources or operations within the vicinity of the project. e. The project site is a vacant lot that has a General Plan land use designation of General Commercial and is zone Restricted Business (C-1) Zone. The land use designation and zoning district does not provide for the establishment of housing of any kind. The proposed project, as submitted is consistent with the character of the surrounding development. Therefore, it is not anticipated that the proposed project will disrupt of divide the physical arrangement of an established community (low- income or minority community). 10 Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Significant Unless Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated 2 POPULATION AND, HOUSING. R�on7d th`e r f ,F iS ,y.. x. project x t; a' 'Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Source X #s: 1990 Census of Population; Housing, MEA, p. 11-1-19- b. Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? Source #s: 1990 Census of Population X and Housing; MEA, p. H -I-19; General Plan EIR, p. 38; General Plan Land Use Map, p. I-27; project site plan; c. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Sources #s: Source #s: 1990 Census of X Population and Housing; MEA, p. II -I-19; General Plan EIR, p. 38; General Plan Land Use Map, p. I-27; project site plan; Existing Conditions - a. The proposed project is a vacant lot that is sited for commercial development by the City' General Plan and Development Code. Additionally, the project site is surrounded (for the most part) by commercial development. Therefore, the proposed project is not expected to displace substantial numbers of people necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. 10 11 b. No change in the City's population is expected because the majority of the employee will come from the immediate area. It is expected that the employee staff will consist o approximately ten members. Therefore, it is not anticipated that the proposed project will induce substantial growth in the area, directly or indirectly,. Additionally, the infrastucture needed to serve this project exists. The applicant will be required to install 'sidewalks, pursuant to City requirements, along Brea Canyon Road and Lycoming Street adjacent to the ro'ect site. c. The proposed project site is a 'vacant lot within a General Plan land use and zoning designation sited for commercial development. Therefore, housing does not, nor was. eve contemplated for the project site. Therefore, the proposed project does not displace any existing housing, thereby necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. 11 12 Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Significant Unless Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated , .r} 3. t a F r � a .— F i'•1y+ zd i$Rt.l.iL"UM GE'Oi®GYCAL,P%Q] bot}l a t,.>}Y "{K 3j Wl�.tc+:� rl ��§��yt JJ�.. � r Y'F �#k`r2dG,s. > ley '1,w, or i ��,, 3 project resultln expose peo e c r r t u M ix �. l N impacts involving-' *0 W a. Fault rupture? Source #s: General Plan, p. IV-2, 3, Fig. IV-1; MEA, p. II-B-7 et seq.; General Plan EIR, Section III A., X pg. 7-10; b. Seismic ground shaking? Source #s: MEA, p. II-13-14, p. II-B-10, Fig. II-B-S Project's preliminary soils report prepared by Soils and Geology Inc. and X dated May 7, 1997 & addendum letter dated April 10, 2000; c. Seiche (water tanks, reservoirs)? Source #s: Walnut Valley Water District Map g 1996. d. Landslides or mudflows? Source #s: General Plan, p. IV-3, Fig. IV-1; MEA, p. II-13-3, Fig. II-B-2; II-B-15. State of California Seismic Hazard Zones Map dated April 15, 1998; Project's preliminary soils report prepared by g Soils and Geology Inc., dated May 7, 1997 & addendum letter dated April 10, 2000; Hydrology Study, prepared by L. P. Leavitt & Assoc., dated April 14, 2000; 12 13 e. Erosion; changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? Source #s: General Plan, p. IV -3, Fig. IV -1; Project's preliminary sails report X prepared by Soils and Geology Inc., dated May 7, 1997 & addendum letter dated April 10, 2000; f. Subsidence of the land? Source #s: MEA, p. II -B-16; Project's preliminary soils report prepared by Soils and X Geology Inc., dated May 7, 1997 & addendum letter dated April 10, 2000; g. Expansive soils? Source #s: MEA, p. II- B -16; Project's preliminary soils report prepared by Soils and Geology Inc., X dated May 7, 1.997 & addendum letter dated April 10, 2000; Existing Conditions - a. No portion of the City has been identified as in an Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone. The closest fault is the Diamond Bar fault, which is described as a "small inactive local fault". Historically, there is no record of any earthquake with an epicenter in Diamond Bar of its Sphere of Influence, and no significant movement has ever been recorded for the Diamond Bar fault. The Whittier -Elsinore fault lies approximately four miles from the project site and has been active in historic times. Three faults with the greatest potential for activity are located in excess of 20 miles from the proposed project. Therefore, the likelihood of fault rupture is limited. b. The proposed project site lies within an area identified as. Seismic Zone 4 by the Uniform Building Code. The site does not appear to be located within an Earthquake Fault Zone. c. The closest reservoir is the Sylven Glen Reservoir, approximately one and one half miles, by direct route, in a southwesterly direction. If seiche occurs, it will not affect the project site. Additionally, the project is not located near any volcanic mountain regions. There are no large bodies of water in close proximity to the project site. 13 14 d. According to the State of California Seismic Hazard Zone Map, the project does not appear to be in a potential liquefaction zone. The applicanCsubmitted a preliminary soils report and before the issuance of City permits, the approval by the City's soils and geotechnical engineers shall be required. The soils report indicates that the natural soils are silty fine to medium sand with gravel in a moist and moderately dense condition. The natural soils are non -expansive with changes in moisture content. Soils below eight feet contain less sand and more clay. The information within the soils report states that the project site is safe against hazard from landslides, slippage,'or settlement.and the proposed construction will have no effect on the geologic stability of property outside the building area. e. Pursuant to the project's preliminary soils report, the subject site and soils condition appear to be conducive to the development of the project. The information within the soils report states that the project site is safe against hazard from landslides, slippage, or settlement and the proposed construction will have no effect on the geologic stability of property outside the building area. The project site is basically flat. Approximately, 560 cubic yards of cut and approximately 360 cubic yards of fill will be required to develop this project. A grading permit will be required. This permit includes standards for erosion control. Additionally, the proposed project is required to comply with NPDES standards. These standards will be enforced through site 'inspections by the City's Public Works/Engineering Division. Currently on-site, erosion does not appear to be an issue. f. Pursuant to the solid report, the proposed project will be safe against subsidence. The proposed construction will have no effect on the geologic stability of property outside the building area. g. Pursuant to the soils report, the natural soils on-site are silty fine to medium sand with gravel in a moist and moderately dense condition. They are non -expansive with changes in moisture content. Soils below eight feet contain less sand and more clay. The report concludes that the project site will be safe against hazard from landslide, slippage, or settlement and the proposed construction will have no effect on the geologic stability of property outside the building area. 14 IN Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Significant Unless Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated 4 t WATER. Would thi t project result tri �:, a. Changes in absorption ratesdrain g rp , age patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? Source #s: City of Diamond Bar Public Works Division; Project site plan; Project's preliminary soils report prepared X by Soils and Geology Inc., dated May 7, 1997 & addendum letter dated April 10, 2000; Hydrology Study, prepared by Kurt Leavitt & Assoc., dated April 14, 2000; b. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? Source #s: General Plan, p. IV -4, Fig. IV -2, X FEMA Flood Panel No. 0650430980 B, Zone C, 12/2/80 c. Discharge into surface water or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved.oxygen or X turbidity)? Source #s: MEA, p. II -C-3, 4, Fig. II -C-1 d. Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? Source #s: MEA, p. II -C 3, 4, Fig. II -C -I; Hydrology Study pre- pared by Kurt Leavitt & Assoc., dated X April 14, 2000; IN KA e. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements? Source #s: MEA, p. II -C-3, 4, Fig. II -C-1; City of Diamond Bar Public Works Division; Project site plan; Project's preliminary soils report prepared by Soils and Geology X Inc., dated May, 7, 1997 & addendum lette dated April 10, 2000; Hydrology Study, prepared by Kurt Leavitt & Assoc., dated April 14, 2000; f. Changes in the quantity of ground waters either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge X capability? Source #s: MEA, p. II -c-3, 4, Fig. II -C-1; project's site/grading plans; Hydrology Study pre -pared by Kurt Leavitt & Assoc., dated April 14, 2000; g. Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? Source #s: City of Diamond. Bar Public Works Division; project site X plan; project's preliminary soils report prepared by Soils and Geology, Inc. and dated November 18, 1999. h. to groundwater quality? Source X JImpacts #s: MEA, p. H -P-3-8. ' i. Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public X water supplies? Source #s: MEA, p. II -P-3 8. j. Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on the Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map or place with 100 -year X flood hazard area structures, which would impede or redirect flood flows? Source #s: General Plan, p. IV -4, Fig. IV -2, MEA, p. II -C-1 et seq. KA Existing Conditions - a. Development of the project site will reduce pervious surfaces, thereby possibly increasing surface runoff. According to the project's hydrology study, drainage after the project will be minimal. Currently, site drainage is 1.53 cubic feet per second (CFS). After development, site drainage is expected to be 1.9 CFS which is an increase of .43 CFS (worst case in a 25 ye storm). A .43 CSF increase is considered minimal. Pursuant to the hydrology study, the installation of two parkway drains on Brea Canyon Road within the right-of-way is required. With project development, the drainage pattern will continue with the utilization of concrete swales and curb and gutter to carry the runoff to the -proposed parkway drains. The runoff will than travel through the existing curb and gutter to the existing eight foot wide catch basin just south of the curb return at the southeast corner of Lycoming Street and Brea Canyon Road. b. The project is not located within a flood hazard area. According to the Fema Flood Map, the project site is located at the edge of, but within Flood Zone C, a 100 year minimal flooding area. Considering this factor and the required drainage devices pursuant to the hydrology study, it is not expected that the proposed project will expose people or property to water related hazards, such as flooding.and as part of the project's conditions of approval, adequate drainage devices will be incorporated into the project's required drainage plan and installed. c.,d.,e. There is no body of surface water on, or in the vicinity of the project site. Therefore, no impacts related to the surface water features, quality or flow will affect the project site.. f. It is not expected that the project will result in a change of groundwater quality, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of ground water recharge ability. the proposed project will have an insignificant impact on the recharge of groundwater because of the reduction in pervious surfaces. g., h. The proposed project will not effect the direction or rate of flow of groundwater...due to conditions described above (a through f). i. It is not anticipated that the proposed project will cause a substantial reduction in the amount o groundwater for public supply. Additionally, the groundwater is not utilized for domestic supply, but only for reclaimed water supply. Therefore, the proposed project will not cause a significant reduction in groundwater supplies or availability of groundwater for public water supplies. j. The project site is not located within a flood hazard area. 17 WE Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Significant Unless Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated AIR QUALFT Would"t`he i Ei� TS *meg� } h a .5 a. Conflict with or obstruct the implementation of the applicable air X quality plan? Source #s: SCAQMD Air Quality Handbook; b. Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? Source #s: MEA, p. II -F-8-10, Fig. II -F-3 X c. Result in cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing X emissions, which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? Source #s: SCAQMD Air Quality Handbook; d. Create objectionable odors? Source #s: SCAQMD Air Quality Handbook; X Existing Conditions - a. Air quality is not expect be affected during grading operations. The project site contains approximately 35,850 gross acres. According to the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Handbook, California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section (Table 9-1) regarding air quality related to operations and construction emission, the proposed project consists of one acre/restaurant with a drive-through will produce approximately 26.4 pounds per day of PM 10 during construction. The proposed project will produce the following operational emissions: approximately 48.06 pounds of ROC per day; approximately 5.73 pounds of NOx per day; approximately 3.53.31 pounds of CO per day; and approximately 4.86 pounds of PM10 per day. The thresholds per day are as follows: PM 10 - 150 pounds; ROC - 55 pounds; NOx -'55 pounds; and CO - 550 pounds. The project site is less than one acre/a restaurant of approximately 2,776 square feet with a drive-through and as such is not expected to surpass the thresholds listed above. Therefore, the proposed project is not expected to conflict with or obstruct the implementation of the applicable air quality plan. WE 19 b. There are no know sensitive receptors within the vicinity of the site. Therefore, any impacts to sensitive receptors will be insignificant. c. The proposed project will mostly affect air quality during construction operations. The affect will be temporary and will not result in a considerable net increase of any pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. d. During the construction phase of the proposed project, diesel fuel odor may be, emitted; however based on the scope of the project the impact is expected to be insignificant. The proposed project is located in very close proximity of the 57 Freeway which contributed to odors in the area. 19 K11 Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Significant Unless Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated ✓ t Y '"i. aa�� %�. i_^2x"iYit � } C TRANSPOR T9 TIOZ�T/CIRC =TiUl;< x ��i�`i9 G}.3 dlY{�. �s;�� �lS �'. � '[ 4YJ ! ' .l 2 SSL i i Would the restlt m probe°ct a. An increase in vehicle trips which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e. result in substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or X congestion at intersections) Source #s: Traffic Study prepared by Darnell & Assoc., Inc., dated March 22, 2000; traffic study review prepared by Warren Sieke, dated April 24, 2000; b. Substantially increase hazards due to design feature (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment)? Source #s: X City's Public Works Division; traffic study review prepared by Warren Sieke (City's Traffic Engineer), dated April 24, 2000; c. Inadequate emergency access? Source #s: City's Public Works Division; X d. Inadequate parking capacity on-site? Source #s: City of Diamond Bar Development Code, Tittle 22, p. III-91, et X seq.; project site plan; K11 21 e. Exceeding, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads and highways? Source#s: City's Public X Works Division; Congestion Management Plan, Ordinance No. 01 (1993); City of Diamond Bar Development Code, III-157 et. seq.; f. Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnabouts, bicycle racks)? Source #s: General Plan, p. V-22; Congestion Management Plan, X Ordinance No. 01 (1993); City of Diamond Bar Development Code, III-157 et. seq.; g. Change in rail, water, or air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that X results in substantial safety risk? Source #s: MEA, p. I1-T-36; project application; Existing Conditions - a. Pursuant to the proposed project's traffic study, the proposed restaurant with drive-through aisle is estimated to generate a total of 1,389 average daily trips (ARTS) with 153 being generated during the morning peak hour and 130 being generated during the afternoon peak hour. As such, the proposed project will not significantly impact any of the intersections in the vicinity of the project site. The intersections analyzed were Brea Canyon Road/Washington Street, Brea Canyon Road/Lycoming Street, Brea Canyon Road/SR60 WB Ramps, Brea Canyon Road/Golden Springs Road, and Golden Springs Road/SR60 EB Ramps. The proposed project did not generate enough traffic to lower an acceptable level of service to an unacceptable level of service at any of the said intersection. 21 RM b. The on-site and off-site circulation was reviewed in the submitted traffic study and by the City's traffic engineer. Itis anticipated that the proposed project will not substantially increase hazards due to design features and on-site and off-site circulation. Pursuant to the City' traffic engineer, the applicant will be required to install a median on Brea Canyon Road to prevent southbound left turn movements into the project site driveway at Brea Canyon Road. This median is necessary due to the proximity of the driveway on the west side of Brea Canyon Road and the entrance to the northbound left turn pocket for the Lycoming Street intersection. c. Two access points for the project site are driveways located on Lycoming Street and Brea Canyon Road. These access point were reviewed by the City's traffic engineer and the Los Angeles. County Fire Department. It is anticipated that emergency access for the project site will be adequate. d. Pursuant to the Development Code, the proposed project is required to provide 36 on-site, standard size parking stalls. Forty-eight are provided. As such, adequate parking is provided on-site. Therefore, the proposal will not result in insufficient parking. e., f. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and maintains an adequate level o service on area roadways. The proposed project, pursuant to the traffic study and the City' review of the study, is not expected to have a significant effect on traffic circulation and levels of service within the City. The proposed project does not meet the criteria or surpass thresholds that would require compliance with the City's Congestion Management Requirements. g. No rail, waterborne, or air traffic facilities or operations are in the vicinity of the proposed project. Therefore, the project will not impact these facilities or operations. RM 23 Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Significant Unless Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated '7 BIOLOGICAL IZtiESOS' ciu�liite `} � ��C.�P1 }` w ; t h tt jiJ..,+. ��t'��i5+nl�V� r dx•! ui 1 kl � ^Y.� f L' : S.• .� � �S"i T3^N'4� ye f'� `1 � � '� �' �.i�'r� .F � Y project. a. Substantial adverse effect; either directly or through, habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive,-or special status species in local or regional plan, policies, or regulations, or by the California X Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services? Source #s: MEA,p. II-D-1-8; General Plan, p. III- 11; project site plan/ application; b. Substantial adverse effect bn and riparian habitat, federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 clean Water Act, or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of fish and X Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services? Source #s: MEA, p. II-D-1-8; General Plan, p. III-11; City of Diamond Bar Development Code, p. III-149 et seq.; project site plan/application; c. A conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Source #s: MEA, X p. II-D-1-8; General Plan, p. III-11, City of Diamond Bar Development Code, p. III-149 et. seq.; 23 24 d. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional or state habitat conservation plan? Source #s: X General Plan, p. I-15-16, p. III -11; MEA p. II -D-1-8; City of Diamond Bar Development Code, p. III -149 et. seq.; e. Substantial interference with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory X wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Source #s: MEA, p. II -D-1-8 & 18; Existing Conditions - a.,b. The proposed project is a vacant lot denude of significant vegetation. The project site does not contain locally designated natural communities or wetlands. As such, the project site is incapable of supporting endangered, threatened or rare species or riparian habitat. Therefore, the proposed project will not result in impacts to endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats because none exist on the project site. c. The City's Development Code protects and preserves oak, walnut, sycamore, arroyo willow and naturalized California pepper trees. The project site does not contain any of these tree species. Therefore, the proposed project will not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources. d. The proposed project will not conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional or state habitat conservation due to the project site's location, lack of habitat and the fact there is not a plan fo this area. e. The proposed project will not interfere with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, o impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites due to the project site's location and lack o habitat that would support such conditions. 24 Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Significant Unless Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated ENERGY 8 RESOURCES Would the project a. Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? Source #s: General Plan, p. III -14; Uniform X Building Code 1998; b. Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? Source #s: MEA, p. II -S-1; Uniform X Building Code, 1998; c. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be the future value to the region and the X residents of the State? Source #s: MEA, p. III -B-17; Existing Conditions - a. The proposed project will be required to comply with the Uniform Building Code design and construction standards and City's Energy Conservation Standards. b. The development of the project will require the use of non -renewal resources, specifically fossil fuels for transport and grading. However, the proposed project will require minimal grading. As such, it is not likely to utilize non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner. c. The proposed site is not within an area identified as possessing mineral resources of regional value. Therefore, it is not anticipated the proposed project will result in the loss of availability of mineral resources that would be of future value to the region and residents of the State. W, Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Significant Unless Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated 9 4 HAZARDS. Would the project a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous material; or create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonable foreseeable upset and X accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Source #s: MEA, p. II - M -1; project application, General Pian, p. IV -1 et seq.; b. Impair the implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Source #s: X Multihazard Function Plan, City of Diamond Bar, 1992; c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or actively hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?' Source #s: Walnut X Valley Unified School District; Pomona Unified School District; City of Diamond Bar House Numbering Map; d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the X public or the environment? Source #s: MEA, p. II -M-1 et seq.; project application/ site plan; W, 27 e. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Sources #s: X MEA, p. II -K-1; General Plan, p. IV -1 et. seq.; Uniform Building Code, 1998; project application/site plan/landscape Existing Conditions - a.,c. The proposed project is not expected to create a significant hazard to the public or iE­e environment through routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials; or create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonable foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. It is expected that materials utilized during the construction phase will generate less than significant impacts. The project site is located across the street from a day care center. However, due to the type of project proposed, it is not expected that the proposed project will emit hazards or handle hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school. b. The proposed project will not interfere with the City'semergency response plan or evacuation d. No current significant hazard to the public or the environment exist on the site, therefore, people will not be exposed to existing sources of potential health hazards. e. The project site is not located within an area where wildlands exist. Therefore, the proposed project is not expected to expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires. 27 28 Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than ENVIRONMENTAL, ISSUES Significant Unless Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact . Incorporated 10 NOISE, Would; the project res�i3t ux.c',; 3;r'`T r q '" , F a. Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in .the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies; or exposure of persons . to or generation of excessive X groundbome vibration or groundborne noise levels? Source #s: General Plan, p. IV -15; MEA, p. II -G-1 et seq.; City of Diamond Bar Development Code, p. III - 81 et.seq.; project application/site plan; b. A substantial permanent increase or temporary or periodic in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project. Source #s: X General Plan, p. IV -15; MEA, p. II -G-1 et seq.; City of Diamond Bar Develop- ment Code, p. III -81 et. seq.; project application/site plan; Existing Conditions - a., b The proposed project is adjacent to a major arterial, Brea Canyon Road and the Pomona (60) Freeway. It is not expected that the proposed project will increase existing noise levels. However given the proximity of residences during construction and minimal grading, noise levels are likely to increase. With permit conditions to protect neighbors during construction, noise levels can be reduced to an acceptable level. The grading permit conditions include the following items: transportation of equipment and materials, and operation of heavy grading equipment shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 am to 5:00 p.m.; all construction equipment shall be properly muffled to reduce noise levels; and exterior construction activities shall be restricted to the hours of 7:00 am to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. 28 �7 Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Significant Unless Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated PUBLIC SERY,iCES. Wouldt�ie ecve an K ...i c. r» ec 11 effect upon,.orresfl:ult m aneedgr:newl oalteredp�r iA;}�y r 5i t 4 government services, in any of the foliiowmg`areas 4� J til. P 1 ti a, Fire Protection? Source #s: General Plan, p. VI -3; X b. Police Protections? Source #s: General Plan, p. VI -3; X c. Schools? Source #s: MEA, p. II -O -l; X d. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? Source #s: General Plan, p. VI -2; X e. Other governmental services? Source #s: General Pian, p. VI -1 et seq.; X Existing Conditions - a.,b. The proposed project will receive fire protection and police protection services from the Los Angeles County Fire and Sheriff Departments. Currently, these agencies provide services to the City of Diamond Bar. It is anticipated that the proposed project will not require the development o new or expanded facilities or services. c. The proposed project is located within the Walnut Valley Unified School District. It is not anticipated that the proposed residential project will create a significant demand to the District. However, the proposed project is required to pay school fees. d. The proposed project has,the ability and is required to hook-up to the existing sewer system under the supervision of the City's Building and Safety Division; and the Los Angeles County Sewer District. with the appropriate fees and plans. As a result, the proposed project will not result in a need for new or altered sewer system. Roads serving the site are existing and have the capacity to serve the proposed project as represent in the traffic study and recommendations/conditions o approval by the City's traffic engineer. e. No other specific governmental services have been identified that may be impacted by the proposed project. �7 30 Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Significant Unless Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated 12 UTILITIES..-SVICE SYSTE%MS� Would •ip 7'AAND the project result -in a need for near systems or, - r :. supplies, or substantial alterahoris -to theollowin g utilities: a. Power or natural gas? Source #s: General Plan, X p. I-18, VI-2; b. Communication systems? Source #s: General X Plan, p.1-18, VI-2; c. Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? Source #s: General Plan, p.1-18, VI- X 2; d. Sewer or septic tanks? Source #s: General Plan, p. I-18, VI-2; X e. Storm water drainage? Source #s: General X Plan, p.1-18, VI-2; f. Solid waste disposal? Source #s: General X Plan, p. I-18, VI-2; g. Local or regional water supplies? Source #s: X General Plan, p. I-18, VI-2; Ex ting Conditions - a.-g. The development of the proposed project will not result in the need for new systems or supplies or substantial alterations to the following: electrical power or natural gas; communication systems; local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities; sewer systems; storm drainage systems; and solid waste disposal systems. 30 31 Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Significant Unless Significant .No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated 13 � Z't'ilt AIESTHETICS tSY F:„1 a.3l�i - ^yds itS alk y. Sidi i + V � �� "y ���utcl�h�P?n,�e�r�� a.. Have a substantial adverse affect on a scenic vista or damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to trees, rock out croppings, and historic buildings X within a state scenic highway? Source - #s: General Plan, p. III-10; b. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? Source #s: General Plan, p. III-10; City of Diamond Bar's X Development Code, p. IV-11 et. seq.; City Design Guidelines, p. 1-25; c. Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Source #s: City of Diamond Bar's X Development Code, p. IV-11 et.seq.; City Design Guidelines, p. 1-25; Ex ting Conditions - a.=c. The proposed project is in compliance with and will be built in compliance with the City' Development Code, Development Review Standards and City Design Guidelines. The proposed project incorporates design elements that create synergy with the existing/surrounding commercial and residential development. As a result, the proposed project will not substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings. Exterior on-site lighting will be installed and shielded in a manner that will not reflect light or glare on to neighboring properties or the roadways. Furthermore, the project site is not located within or adjacent to a scenic vista, historic buildings and/or a state scenic highway. The project site is denude of native vegetation or rock out croppings. 31 01a Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Significant Unless Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated t K i r x s Xii f,S, r.,�`^f3.�.Ntdtx 2 �.. CULL ES0URCR: �Woule" y ,�i �t'`(f'c«l9.. `^ '�kR'' f! , I {,•�,,,� `'� ` a 14 project a. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or, unique geologic features? Source #s: ~ X MEA, II -H-1 et. seq.; b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to 15064.5. Source X #s: MEA, II -H-1 et seq.; c. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of historical resources as defined in 15064.5? Source #s: MEA, X ][1-H- let seq.; d. Have the potential to cause a physical change, which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? Source #s: X MEA, II -H -let seq.; e. Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? Source X #s: MEA, H -H -let seq.; Ex' ting Conditions - a. There are no palenontological sited identified within the City and the project site which currently contains a graded flat pad. Therefore, the proposed project will not directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature. b. The Archaeological Information Center with the University of .California at Los Angeles has conducted a records search in which five areas have been identified archaeological resources within the Diamond Bar City limits or sphere of influence. However, the proposed project is not located within these five sites. Therefore, the proposed project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of archaeological resources. 01a 33 c. No historical sites have been identified within the vicinity of the project site and none are expected. According to the Archaeological Information Center, there are at present not recorded historical sites within a one -mile radius around the City or its sphere of influence. Therefore, development of the proposed project will not affect historical resources. d.,e. No unique ethnic cultural values, religious or sacred uses are located within a quarter mile o the project site. Therefore, the proposed project will not have the potential to create adverse impacts on said resources. 33 34 Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Significant Unless Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated 15 RECREATION. Would the project a. Increase the demand use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that X substantial deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Source #s: General Plan, p.11-1 et seq.; b. Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have X an adverse physical effect on the environment? Source #s: General Plan, p. H-1 et seq.; Existing Conditions - a.,b. Commercial projects of this type are not generally associated with creating adverse impacts on parks or other recreation opportunities. Patron of the proposed project will be either residence of the City, workers within the City or freeway travelers. 34 35 Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Significant Unless Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated MANDATORY 'FIND 16 SIGNIFICANCE a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining level, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or X restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or pre -history? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of X long-term, environmental goals? c. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of X past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the affects of probable future projects.) d. Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either X directly or indirectly? ' 35 Existing Conditions - a. Due to the information presented in the application, plans submitted and site surveys, it is anticipated that the proposed project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining level, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or pre-history. b. Due. to the information presented in the application, plans submitted, site surveys, soils report, hydrology report, traffic report and analysis within this document, it is anticipated that the proposed project does not have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long term, environmental goals? c. Due to the information presented in the application, plans submitted, site surveys, soils report, hydrology report, traffic report and analysis within- this document, it is anticipated that the proposed project does not have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the affects of probable future projects.) d. Due to the information presented in the application, plans submitted, site surveys, soils report, hydrology report, traffic report and analysis within this document, it is anticipated that the proposed project does not have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. 36 HCE{VE� � �/lY DF '��0 D�R ci�� YlD MAY 15 P°n �� | SIGN CRITERIA For proposed Farmer Boys restaurant 3 4'X8'single face interior illuminated cloud signs mbninstalled onbldg. facias. One sign per facia: North, East, and West. Copy reads: FARMER BOYS WORLD'S GREATEST HAMBURGERS aoper plans. (logo }tr. style) Colors: 3G3O-143Poppy red 383O-7GHolly green 3630-25 Sunflower VVhiteb/ground. Lighting: 8DOm.o.fluorescent. Cabinet: .040 pre -coated aluminum . dark green. Shape follows form of FARMER BOYS logo. These cloud signs are standard onall FARMER BOYS restaurants. 4'}{ 8`X 6'hal|double face interior illuminated monument sign reading: FARMER BOYS WORLD'S GREATEST HAMBURGERS Breakfast Lunch Dinner as per sketch. Logo letter style Colors: White b/ground Copy: 3G3O-143Poppy red 383D-7SHolly green 3630-25 Sunflower Cabinet: .O4Dpre-coated aluminum dk.green ( arched top oncabinet ) Base: Aluminum tex-coottomatch bldg. stucco. Lighting: 8OOm.a.fluorescent. Sign to be installed in planter area on North-West corner ofproperty. Perpendicular to Brea Canyon Rd. Sign to be set back .10' from property line. Landscaping around sign shall be more than enough to comply with City ordinance. This is a standard monument sign for FARMER BOYS restaurants. 4 18" X2�double face interior illuminated directional signs reading: DRIVE THRU THANK YOU wyFBOY logo DONOT ENTER 3 signs to reading DRIVE THRU to be installed 1 at each drive way entrance, (in landscaped area) and inlandscaped area near South -East corner ofrestaurant. 1sign reading: THANK YOU DCJNOT ENTER tobeinstalled inlandscaped area where cars exit the DRIVE THF{U. Colors: #3G3D-7GHolly green b/grnundw/ white copy. Cabinet: .O4Opre-coated aluminum dk.green Lighting: 8ODnn'o.fluorescent. Signs to have center pole mount w/ pole cover tex-coated to match bldg. stucco. 4'3"X 8'8^ interior illuminated single face free standing menu sign. Overall height ofmenu sign 6 3^. Colors: Cabinet and poles -Beige. Face: Black b/groundwith white copy and clear LEXANcovers. (8oandInfor menu items \ Lighting: ROOm.o.fluorescent. Sign to be installed in planter area between patio and drive thru entrance.( North side of property These signs are supplied by PEPSI CORP. and are standard issue at all FARMER BOYS restaurants. This sign program for Farmer Boys Restaurants coincides with all of their other advertising ie, diplayngthe corporate. logo onmugs, cups, napkins etc. Cb \� L nmm� mvm nrv.m, GJ APPROXIWTE £ARMWORK OLNNnrr££ h.•rs nr5 °ar <ir` o ar m•`.`.u�acr e SCALE 1" X0.20 w RE C-Ej V ED Cil Y OF DIAMOIND RAF' I L!` -G., BLDG., LNGR%. '00 APR 21 AT :41 BgNr L.MdBiL• C/1 nim U/ '/N/ l Y q 10-000-e J-4'0 ev 0 1W w,i,. aw alu raumro cacitl7dd "Y.Ivdg ft amvmw INMYd 5, -7fzF 9E rw cr, 001/0 '03N Nrtdyzl .U'o; UL 011Vd H.L N 0 N 9LCC INYhW4S3'd a --i jadj ij 09 09593 Y3dY SS0b9 0, Ae?)4� 17xQw NVIcl aws =mn mcqwB— I % H9 , ts , cawjObd c .1.4 05 rQL f:::" l7vM =-G H91H.9 advxiaYvl IM a991.m Ra 01 V, fi3fAdnY [\ % c 32G� NNn WhO (3) CZD 17, sx. WN rtGq cGw I sada uYH-rrm r LvWN7,U wraglls� uo-ito wafw� Aywo-IR-M er*u-aA= 2i i G e N I W 0 --------------- — — ---–3-------------------- 6L90-999 606 6t?89'VL 9b -O #'01-1 60926 'VO 'BGISHgAl�l '2ilO Nouonao�jd L9Lt 00 NOIS NO3N'301S�JBAI�l 3 = 24 DIVOS aw\o2iddv *i*n 30 01 NOIS INBosEkm-i *v,n ooe vynNmmVN9:q�lS'W1 :I3N19V0 NBB�iO A70H 9L -09,Z # MOTIBA-�I3AAO1-W8 qz-ocz # AV-I2JaA0 IANIA OB�i AddOd Cir G-OZZ # dVO Albi /AA BOVA X31d 311HAA..94/S NOIS cnoio:;ovd 310NIS YO 'WO (INONVICI 'Mi NOANVO V3�i9 s2j:ioiinMVH SA09 �iDNWd 13NI8V0 NO H011AAS 103NNOOSIC isvilve SdNYUNBosallon-u aov:l 011A; lov - NVIS HBd 9 'NIN VIOV4 OiNl SI108 a-10001,,9 XA/C 210 scinis OiNl SIMS X,,t4 VIOV?E)0'19- llviqcl NOUVTlViSNl CNnoHE)/iaB.LlHM— 7f7 J7 AV �42MOI:iNns gz"ozlz u3cluoe GMM etre-ocz IV I oi,ij 'DS FIE 4c NSIS cinoio 13NNVHO 4- A W V':) ' NVa MOAN I a INvNnvls;i�!i N�wNv:� NOIIVAal� HINON clu F T Z: NCIIVA;11� ISV� M, NCIIV ala 1SaM 6L20-999 606 'Hd 6te9t7t 9b-0 #'Oil 609M 'VO'DGMJDAN 'd110 NouonaodId 1,941, '00 NOIS NO:;N 2Q dl IAIZ3 ,G = 2/1, El-lvos ND3160,07101-1 9L-0S9S # M0113A HEIMO-UNns qz-osgs # cl,qdf Addod £t !. -Me # AdOO IANIA J-Mion-iSNVJl M /M EOV3 X:3-ld 31lHM SdAV-1 1N:3os3djomj'v*A oog N33d10 'Na CIA I NlVd 13NI8V0 31AIVJzl NO'dl MEM 319noo C330-13AA /M 13NISVO imnNiAniv oto* :-Isve Ivoo-X21 AdOO 311HAA QNnOH!D/2 N33�1J NE13HO AIIOH 9L-0C9Z d13MQIANns qz-oEgs ,-, Mldl Ebb -0£9£ GNno�jvsYEI-Icl 311HM H.UUl a ab asEar Id N!DIS 1N3WNOIAI CIDiVNIvqn-iii dJONKNI 30VJ 3ionoa IF 'HO `2]V8 GNOINVIC 'CRI NOkNVQ VMiG sa3mjn8lAlVH SA09 ;13MV:J 6LSO-999 606 'Hd 6t,MIL St, -O # '011 609Z6 'd0 'dCIIS2l�nRi '2110 NouonC102dd 49L6 Oo NOIS NO3N �IC]IS�GAI 1 ,G = 24 31VOS- Sdnd-1 1N30S321omd 'v,n 008 AdOO 311HM C]Nl1080/9 Nd22JO A`IOH 9L -0£Z # Ad00 -IANIA 'SNVi:U AS /M SDOHd 31LIHM Nddd`J C7d.LNidd C]NVV Cl MNd IBNISV0 AnNtAn-i J ot,o' SNOIS -IHNOLLO�3810 C13-Minmi1 2J0183 I N1 'V0 '2JV@ CINOAVICI '(DA NO).NVO d3�19 s2ja)H(19mi s1.09 2i3mjv1 311HM 1bOO X31 Z SII IJ'UODDu i l E-1 GI 1 I It-- „9Z--- i „26—H SNJIs IVNOIiOgala t7 6L20-999 606 'Hd 6V99t,4 giv-Z) # '011 609Z6 *VO '�300�9AI2J '2410 Nouoncjo�jd 49LG 00 LAOIS NO�K9GISN3AN J21 83d siioe-r 2 G x Z/ G - t, S-Leod 1:331s A L/e x "IF x 2 3 = 24 :q�vos 30VA aEAOO NVX31 23`V`310 AdOO BJ.IHM (Mmic/9 >iNvo SdVq'V-1 �-LIHM *1000 iNaOS�3zomzi -v-n bos NMON91HO11 13N1GVO-1V1:3n'VO ZZ (3nssi ISdEld CIHVCNViS) Nsis nNDA SN1C]NViS'9:M-4 C391VNiNnm1HO1H:;iN1 DOV-4 EMONIS 0 'VO'�JVG CINOINVICI '(R] NOANVO VeRlg mj�o�ng[NVH SAOe U3MIV=1 I�-ilzt -1 i I.0 19 r r� •rArnRw Rr¢tmemean+rnnxwwaimrue nou]na�nmuwr®nR�neowwas ea..mxrwum:wua]wmrwe m unwa•nwa.a.LLsxwm Ar Aw�w �w� MmISMwMrmMwnO�vw '"ww+r®e�m�a+'wes�v�+rsww •aaevrex�esAmuwrmrwaenus �wcmc�u�nvm'mwrew�i noiuw�aA •wxmmxrwu+�+srsmrAaamnu¢Ar oeaxoemmwmn.we�mroae�wxnr w.rrm•o]aannea�wua�•sMraM.s anuwa� trR��vo®�xsrtr�]watateac m"ava®:muenwrn�ra+m�e �Ai��dei.�]��w �RlmAfm •tlfO12QP W /Gat]tRi R'6UtsoLL WUMCA mri¢smreracarawmea•xwar®a arrcmwxawwwae*uLLow•e+a aesnem+xa. a�aooaMmun �nvw'nx�m°a�QO� \RcitOARI1lVCI V AIImOMIM(�1N i11ft! �pep�Oim.MllCft]!•6�tO1LP �]MfrtO AAiRRL�tI•aIYLtMO1AMtJtOAT01. IIM�:•RIICa111RRrRlwt '�aewowwruxMAm.wmwmxm ®Raesunrsmawn►maama ia. lop MAv 12 X11 * 0 � £—------------- � \\ v L Y c o M i a e r R e e r '�'�ns�m�e'uf°�r r"']etoaR`�"-1II1xmu�a,ne ecmAmA.tm.eaeMnr 'tmmreo]a awmsa�w.e_euaety iQAr]f Rl:GOflNiTlu� 11R6fwwGTM1O� _�auw retwrswa� mxwr.aMnumnor. 1 E,d's8�6FA� a _ c�P 2-OC6 _C CUP 2-000 -o,�5 pp, �20oo - 0 IL 9 r • AfLeaC6'.IWiSm aaelawrNie 2►!A•lL..fPJ�VOG ' IA1laCIPQCN MmIa[Ste OMtt a tefAtiID • ANN}Ay CrM1H SSCfMT P!®i K ALL MetYA LriiN/ti1.It C'ORk! •f1AIb L41I,AW'mIfPAML• AIO ALLYA� 1'O.tti Ni Wl V Q'MIIIlmRndlt ew1 a a,LA� ...�wm 2R.rAor Lw.vm • G@AYtt6V abNM•LL aronm xrialaAmiAaat At0lLT 11agN CA •e..VCNi.l1! Na:I RANI! AQ tA'GrAe t6b eP ee C. Nf R. •naLTaNAcxleaQ q@lLLMAY2lQL 2r' N • 5' N. M cS• ��ptAlptMAlWifpLAal e9/.A/1'lI1VLI.SNef •NMO'9rAitfldDet4Fi4N0INGGPAMfIND tl fPDl4L • tOt GlN3INM Mmt tlDeeie n W 16lonl{N ib ar •NINRNNO1 eRYPQ1 RlY9rA1T}9191LFWLa NATO ATALL oneaanLwlawro'ra•x•x • n� Nal uruew a Num KR M tatarau mnrnrz wu m aamm n nmLrAa to Amwu w M ewma+s uo. • AVIC W IG NL` taHQBt9e6 SleiDlll9• fO1eKJN. ML fQT.Atl a1PIPAHttD AIDAIaO • acvrLeuwaalawLaevmm nwcnkat 'NMlnL 4 SAwTA�/RN9NLILee NlatxAe(ATVbr nG 1Cl LYti 70 •SNS NIH K IIYei Ge RNNIGN W 1. iAN 1(INft\mJNn DlIW.SKX3m AlW WASNQI/ICA N'GlN11LY t641Mltt9bMAM• f06Ye MMQlYl.t1O. •.rm�moe'atasnrnewiam�vommxwaltaawr tL2lwlla•nTLLANrmrH • nmsinx'an3Puanemou+axaawNanNmA � Lmx a d Nve PAV6t!' a srt•rm Nmawn m reolwa n ao•m. Tvn �xs>,vcL e:lcx,m to Hwa r� tH' AN.LMr1LLK �CSl'mh12xiAD At3fli]lGm,A ISAdaN•IILl'CRIYIYtefSNTfHxQM RP1R • TACCraR` Dl91NNP CRCiCIN.A•✓DN1CV A!e aYDM'DMAYkO QtLs�is xcvrzy. NdlanAm a rAnLa a caxml nr.A awl a Nimrmerbacneju+manarcnes NsaNelurw� wximavtaNAaawlmecTAwL�svAaweM Aal•(rQ naacNeexarRn..om aAa oaAa t16H01GiIN(AID 1n IAvel mw�a•itns�neiavmlrnar.�Nalmsa®ro ISAaanvx ®ifU.'i•N LNOI A oNraID PeecN a t� m Real QAI.VIL a Le twel wwl x Aea.L M ARI•mR NAu mx A IGNO•aN. Iva ars. M tmmwPm Q w we nNl x. • rol�en�aow�o.ffix�a+miMo� au�uwz • �� � rau�ma�u�+a�vsc�'�' •ALL xmmetwlem WRY1Qntshtenabi¢n.ma+N cruet • ALL=04%INLNAmWDM V-"AY3ro"WLY" AMCemmum .mvswromneleee mNmelrreoarlattPLAaa' A'IDtiY NltpaaW NYD 11e IACte • CRf itYGMKM w 6 fltla4Ql 1NA1Ye1f, b 101eJ9 eT INL.O4Viel IfAl1�a61 •lIVl1[L i4YidY.IIA1m Ple CQPBL9at • ATeL AIIfMTOIroSPAT'®VEeICV.0 11690®lAflee •�e'OL �lu•AMGe1�6tL1R�N NVYULN}Je{•AAPlilafNb VR+2 ' In'/�NTI Q P0.' OIin91BR4 ro a b N"G.®ef M NC 9eLMl .RTA a Sr5kWM= l•mNAtnaxLMM '!Nf LXn� 9P11 S OCI ACL IN]t M IERL Iti1 W f M U! Q A IE! •NeLyNMaemcuaarm OPfCA.MWLa LNi11Elta TINTMG YYN.EtL • e x7,+Le w+n vonAA, n N' a m cL e a v e: • ALrlasAn we monger sTsml raN cntoe+u-mE raver eamercmuvgxaxs � acn . nNc xumere xw1 a nnn®d ear mae rnewu N]Aa LQ�. Qr mAlmm I1NOlM Ifl (KgLYlR cxAarcam cwNxNoeae•ma+AKanrAeox I tXa3•NGY Arl b OtlL1Q N NTIgI KirC TGmn OLY PNIGFNBnVQ:A1Ni0YE7NDtLi®BlM9fAiE RQ: lwaW.swLa lrtNLID. • � Wf/etLtVCeanBJ6elNMANAt.6?!!X ttvixwz.AceaA ne;NNNtNLramAAa nST/tLE ro Hl RImCr lF M BeDor a Ha Raa4 Atex nNelnrc�erNt rx T T U 1 1 1 I NORTH ELEVATION �V..w EAST ELEVATION V -I= W. Pd 2 SOUTH ELEVATION W."ur-w MST ELEVATION W."ur-r-o ILI CD SOUTH ELEVATION W."ur-w MST ELEVATION W."ur-r-o CL .3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 •L Y C O M I N S T R E E T • . *1 *2 • f ATSSD• aZyHiTGUu 9 1.7 2.2 2.5 3.9gI- 2 x2z a a2 6 *2. 1 'l. 3 *0 7 0 4 *0 2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 •0.0 0.0 Q . P��AS' f' - - - 400.2 .2 0.2 0.1 •0.1 0 S 0 .1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 s W fr. 7--- 6.4 - 6 9 \ �.�ppe 81X28^X /(1) PROPOSED MENU B •LANDS \`P 6` H 5'2"X15^ ' HIGH 9 . 0. 1 •9.7 0.8 0.49 0.4 *0 3 *0 2 *0 1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 !LANDSCAPE 13. 16.5 1 4.5 •2.1 1.3 \ \s\ E) Cam LINK F�7�C10E • 0.3 ,•2.4 .0 \ • 3 r \ GH E DIM 5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 ANDSCAPE \ \ �a` 1 .0 T�22 O A377., 9 2.3 2 . \ \ 0.3 •0 . t 9 4.5 Q PROPOSE SPF 2.4 `\ 1.9 1. 0. 6 0.3 0.2 •0.1 0.1 •0.0 ALL \ 7 2. .65. \ 0.2 0.5 a 2 3 •H/C \. 5.4 6. \ 4.4 •2ti,4 i. 0zN 0.3 •0.2 0.1 •0.1 � " \ \ 'cfPROM E 2. ALL S .2 4.8 •�-EASHtNT ♦ • 0.2 0.3 •0 6 .1 H/C V \14.5 -8. . 3 2. \ 0 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 PROPOSED RESTAURANT 'hT;S. � \ 2,776 S4• FT. 0 •2. 4.4 8.0 \ 0.1 •0 0.4 17 .0 20.0 ~'2 6 6.6 1.6 0.7� 0.3 0.2 0.2 \ %\ •2 3 .2 5.4 8.3 15. \ 1 0. 21F' 0.5 \ 1 1 •9.0, . 4.5 *2. z�s. •0.5 •0.3 0.3 LANDSCAPE � •3.5 4.0 5.3 7.7 5.7 12 0 LT. S. •. • 2 X1.7 1. �Ce .9 0. 6 0 . •0.3 1 • • 0 sIDEw P Ax 4 •6 D 7.0 15 . •20 . 9.3 •19 . l •10 . 7 ��8to' 0.9 0.2 •0.9 :;4� 2.3 5 7 Pg8 7 •6. B 5.8 •9.0 17.2 14.9 14.4 12.1 13.2 8.9 7.1 tag= 0. 9 0.2 •0 4 1.1-A2.8 7 \ 15 . v V4 17.8 •14.0 8.8 8.2 ]1.7 12.6 71.7 14.7 ]2.0 ] •0.6 2.9 10. 1 .l •5. DSA 0.2 0.4 .0 2.6 •5. \ ,. \ 12.4 16.4 17.0 1 .6 .2 11.7 7.1 .9 1 .3 6 2.5 0' 0.5 0.1 0.3l.6,� 3.7 0 • • • LT. S. (E) 6' BLOCK L .6 10. 17. 9 .6 0.1 0.2 0. 0. 1.7 3• 3• 3.11 4.8 8.3 12.5 9.3 4.8 2.0 0.8 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.9 0. 1.4 2.6 15.3 •10.1 •12.4 7.9 4.2 2.3 2.1 2.8 4.2 5.2 4.4 2.6 0.5 0.2 0.0 •0.1 •0.1 0. 0. 40.8 ]. 2.9 4.5 •5.0 •3.9 •2.4 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.7 •2.0 1.7 1.1 0.6 0.3 0.1 PHOT&ME C SITE PLAN N O R T H Project MEETINGS June 13, 2000 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR COMMUNITY & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT PLANNING COMMISSION PROJECTS Case # PM Location 61/11 3 CC 6/20 PC 6/27 CC 715 P 7/11 1 C 7/11 8 PC 7/25 ALVAREZ DESIGN CUP 2000-01 AJL 21008 LYCOMING PH MCUP 2000-6 a �' MV 2000-6 (Farmer Boys Food — Restaurant) TP 2000-3 DIAMOND BAR HONDA/ VAR 2000-02 AIL FY 2000-2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ON HOLD - PER APPLICANT JDS CITYWIDE X (Freeway Sign) PLAN — GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY GOULD, RICHARD ADR 2000-12 LKS 2823 CRYSTAL RIDGE PROCESSING DIAMOND BAR WEST (TRACT 47850-LOT25) HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE GOULD, RICHARD/DIAMOND BAR DR 2000-07 AJL 2800 CRYSTAL RIDGE X KING, ANDREW/GOLDRUSH INV. ADR 2000-14 WEST, LLC 24199 HIGHCREST - PROCESSING (Single Family Residence) I TRACT 31977 (Single Family Residence) PARKS/TRAILS MASTER PLAN JDS CITYWIDE X TWEN MA ARCHITECTS DR 2000-06 LKS 2515 CROWFOOT PH (Single Family Residence; Pool, Tennis Court, VAR 2000-04 Tree Removal) ND 2000-03 TR 2000-01 MCUP 2000-04 PENDING Case # PM Location BHOGAL, SURINDER ADR 2000-10 AIL 23415 PLEASANT MEADOW PROCESSING (Single Family Residence) MCUP 2000-6 a �' MV 2000-6 TP 2000-3 DIAMOND BAR HONDA/ VAR 2000-02 AIL 515 S. GRAND AVENUE ON HOLD - PER APPLICANT ALEXANDER DEVELOPMENT (Freeway Sign) GOULD, RICHARD ADR 2000-12 LKS 2823 CRYSTAL RIDGE PROCESSING DIAMOND BAR WEST (TRACT 47850-LOT25) HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE JDS CITYWIDE PROCESSING KING, ANDREW/GOLDRUSH INV. ADR 2000-14 Si 24199 HIGHCREST - PROCESSING (Single Family Residence) I TRACT 31977 g:\\project tneetingWoc PH = PUBLIC HEARING X =NOT A PUBLIC HEARING d PROJECT MEETINGS hme 14- WM CITY OF DIAMOND BAR ( f-%lkXh TT TATTmAT o_ Tyr<rr+r n g:\\project meeting\\doc PH = PUBLIC HEARING X = NOT A PUBLIC HEARING --- - - a va 1vi�QJ. l".,I v1L'1V1 PENDING Case # PM Location KING, ANDREW/GOLDRUSH INV. ADR 2000-15 SJ 687 RADBURY PROCESSING (Single Family Residence) KING, ANDREW/GOLDRUSH INV. ADR 2000-16 SJ 24161 14IGHCREST PROCESSING (Single Family Residence) LEE, AN -CHI (PALAZZO INC.) ADR 2000-13 AJL 2718 STEEPLECHASE LANE PROCESSING (Single Family Residence) METRICOM — WVUSD CUP 2000-02 AJL 21400 PATHFINDER PROCESSING (Wireless Telecommunications) PASCUAL, GENE ADR 2000-07 SJ 2001 DERRINGER LANE PROCESSING (Single Family Residence) PATROSKE, WALT ADR 2000-05 LKS 22454 STEEPLECHASE LANE PROCESSING (Single Famil Residence) SHUN, SIMON ADR 2000-11 LKS 2629 ROCKY TRAIL PROCESSING (2,477 Square Feet Addition) YEH JERRY MV 2000-05 AJL 2688 BLAZETRAIL PROCESSING (Single Family Residence) DR 2000-05 JCC DEVELOPMENT ZC 2000-01 AJL DIAMOND BAR BLVD PROCESSING (Zone Chan a to Commercial) PM 10208, PARCEL 2 ZONING MAP AMENDMENT JDS CITYWIDE PROCESSING g:\\project meeting\\doc PH = PUBLIC HEARING X = NOT A PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF DIAMOND BAR NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING AND AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF DIAMOND BAR The Diamond Bar Planning Commission will hold a regular meeting at the South Coast Quality Management District Auditorium, 21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, on June 13, 2000, at 7:00 P.M. Items for consideration are listed on the attached agenda. 1, John Ilasin, declare as follows: I am employed by the City of Diamond Bar, Community and Development Services Department. On June 9, 2000, 1 posted copies of the Notice for the Regular Meeting of the Diamond Bar Planning Commission, to be held on June 13, 2000, at the following locations: City Hall i South Coast Quality Management District Auditorium 21660 E. Copley Drive 21865 East Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Diamond Bar, CA 91765 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on June 9, 2000, at Diamond Bar, California. CWhn. nn Community and Development Services Dept. gA\affidavitpo9fing.doc I VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO AffDRESS TBE PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT: ,0: Planning commission Secretary DATE: IROM: 1 /11 in 6A, ADDRESS: ORGANIZATION: '5UBJECT: ec.4 a," 's /-I, WE N M•W N would like to address the Planning Commission on the above stated i reflect my name and address as printed above. Please have the Commission Minutes VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COABMSION AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT: - --------------- TO: Planning Commission Secretary DATE'pp Fd,7,Wn ADDRESS: ORGANIZATION: /,z () zfze�z-- �el e-- lv,5, - S-UBJE�T: /T I would like to address the Planning Commission on the above stated item. Please have the commission Minutes reflect my name and address as printed above. A Signature . NOTE: All persons may attend meetings and address the Planning Commissioh Thismmform is irate nded to assist the Chairman in ensuring that all persons wishing to addresse Coission will have the opportunity and to ensure correct spelling of names in the Minutes.