HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/25/2000PLANNIN(FILE°°PY
"MUR
co"'Mli"ISIOIN
AGENDA,
Apri125, 2000
7: 00 P.Me
South Coast Air Quality Manageme ' nt District
Auditorium
21865 East Copley Drive
Diamond Bar, CA
Chairman
Vice Chairman
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Steve Nelson
Bob Zirbes
George Kuo.
Joe Ruzicka
Steve Tye
Copies of staff reports or other written documentation relating to agenda items are on file in the Planning
Division of the Dept of Community & Development Services, located at 21660 E. Copley Drive, Suite 190,
and are available for public inspection. if you have questions regarding an agenda item, please call
(909) 396-5676 during regular business hours.
In an effort -to comply with the requirements of Title // of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the City of
Diamond Bar requires that any person in need of any type of special equipment, assistance or
accommodation(s) in order to communicate at a City public meeting must Worm the Dept. of Community 4
Development Services at (909) 396-5676 a minimum of 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting.
Please retrain trom smoking, eating or The City of Diamond Bar uses recycled paper
drinking in the Auditorium and encourages you to do the same
City of Diamond Bar
Planning Commission
MEETING RULES
PUBLIC INPUT
The meetings of the Diamond Bar Planning Commission are open to the public. A, member of the public may
address the Commission on the subject of one or more agenda items and/or other items of which are within the
subject matter jurisdiction of the Diamond Bar Planning Commission. A request to address Commission should
be submitted in writing at the public hearing, to the Secretary of the Commission
As a general rule of the opportunity for public comments will take place at the discretion of the Chair. However,
in order to facilitate the meeting, persons who are interested parties for an item may berequested to give their
presentation at the time the item is called on the calendar. The Chair may limit individual public input to five
minutes on any item; or the Chair may limit the total amount of time allocated for public testimony based on the
number of people requesting to speak and the business of the Commission.
Individuals are requested to conduct themselves in a professional and businesslike manner. Comments and
questions are welcome so that all points of view are considered prior to the Commission making
recommendations to the staff and City Council.
In accordance with State Law (Brown Act), all matters to be acted on by the Commission must be posted at least
72 hours prior to the Commission meeting. In case of emergency or when a subject matter arises subsequent to
the posting of the agenda, upon making certain findings, the Commission may act on ,item that is not on the
posted agenda.
INFORMATION RELATING TO AGENDAS AND ACTIONS OF THE COMMISSION
Agendas for Diamond Bar Planning Commission meetings are prepared by the Planning Division of the
Community and Development Services Department. Agendas are available 72 hours prior to the meeting at City
Hall and the public library, and may be accessed by personal computer at the number below.
Every meeting of the Planning Commission is recorded on cassette tapes and duplicate tapes are available for a
nominal charge.
ADA REQUIREMENTS
A cordless microphone is available for those persons with mobility impairments who cannot access the public
speaking area. The service of -the cordless microphone and sign language interpreter services are available by
giving notice at least three business days in advance of the meeting. Please telephone (909) 396-5676 between
8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday.
HELPFUL PHONE NUMBERS
Copies of Agenda, Rules of the Commission, Cassette Tapes of Meetings (909) 396-5676
Computer Access to Agendas (909) 860 -LINE
General Agendas (909) 396-5676
email: info@ci.diamond-bar.ca.us
PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
Tuesday, April 25, 2000
CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Next Resolution No. 2600-6
1. ROLL CALL: COMMISSIONERS: Chairman Steve Nelson, Vice Chairman Bob Zirbes, George Kuo,
Joe Ruzicka, and Steve Tye.
2. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS:
This is the time and place for the general public to address the members of the Planning Commission on any item
that is within their jurisdiction, allowing the public an opportunity to speak on non-public hearing and non-acbnda
items. Please complete a Speaker's Card for the recording Secretary (Completion of this form is voluntary).
There is a five-minute maximum time limit when addressing the Planning Commission.
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Chairman
4. CONSENT CALENDAR:
The following items listed on the consent calendar are considered routine and are approved by a single motion.
Consent calendar items may be removed from the agenda by request of the Commission only:
4.1 Minutes: April 11, 2000
5. OLD BUSINESS: None.
6. NEW BUSINESS: None.
7. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: None.
8. PUBLIC HEARING:
8.1 Development Review No. 2000.02 (pursuant to Code Section 22.020) is a request for architectural design
review and vesting of 127 single family homes within the approved subdivision identified as Tra ct
No. 52267. The proposed request consists of six, two story plans, ranging from approximately 3,366
square feet to 7,135 square feet, with two and three car garages and additional floor plan options. Each
plan will have three architectural styles. This request also includes architectural approvals of the project's
main entry designs, perimeter fencing, landscaping, and walls.
April25, 2000
9.
10.
11.
Page 2
Project Address: 700 Block of Diamond Bar Boulevard
(east side of Diamond Bar Boulevard at Tin Drive) .
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
Property Owner: Pulte Home Corporation
.18401 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 200, Irvine, Ca 92612.
Applicant: Scott Wright, Pulte Home Corporation .
18401 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 200, Irvine, Ca 92612
Environmental Determination: Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA), the City has determined that this project is consistent with the previously certified Environmental
Impact Report No. 97-2 for vesting Tract No. 52267. No further environmental review is required.
Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review
No. 2000-02, Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval, as listed within the resolution.
PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS:
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
10.1 Public Hearing dates for future projects.
SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS:
CITY ON LINE COMMITTEE:
PARKS AND RECREATION
COMMITTEE MEETING:
'1 • 1:9.
I Ulf i G 1•
CITY COUNCIL MEETING:
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
MEETING:
Wednesday, April 26, 2000 — 6:00 P.M.
AQMD Room CC -2,21865 E. Copley Drive
Thursday; April 27, 2000 — 7:00 P.M.
AQMD Hearing Board Room, 21865 E. Copley Drive
Sunday, April 30, 2000 — 4:00 P.M. to 7:00 P.M.
Shilo Hilltop Suites, 3103 Temple Avenue
Tuesday, May 2, 2000. — 6:30 P.M.
AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Drive
Tuesday, May 9, 2000 — 6:00 P.M.
AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Drive
April 25, 2000
Page 3
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING:
TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION
COMMISSION MEETING:
MEMORIAL DAY HOLIDAY:
12. ADJOURNMENT:
Tuesday, May 9, 2000 — 7:00 P.M.
AQMD Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Drive
Thursday, May 11, 2000 — 7:00 P.M.
AQMD Room CC -2, 21865 E. Copley Drive
Monday, May 29, 2000 - City Offices Closed
City Offices will reopen Tuesday, May 30, 2000
MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
. APRIL 11, 2000
Chairman Nelson called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. in the South Coast Air Quality Management
Headquarters Building Auditorium, 21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissioner Kuo.
1. ROLL CALL:
Present: Chairman Steve Nelson, Vice Chairman Bob Zirbes, and Commissioners
George Kuo, Joe.Ruzicka, and Steve Tye.
Also Present,: James DeStefano, Deputy City Manager, Sonya Joe, Development Services
Assistant, Linda Smith, Development Services Assistant, and Stella Marquez,
Administrative Secretary.
2. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: None offered.
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: DCM/DeStefano asked that New Business Item 6.1 be taken off
calendar and re-agendized for May 9 or 23, 2000, when issues have been resolved with the Highcrest
Homeowners Alliance.
11
4
CONSENT CALENDAR:
4.1 Minutes of the March 28, 2000, meeting.
C/Ruzicka moved, C/Tye seconded, to approve the minutes of the meeting of March 28, 2000, as
corrected. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES:
COMM[ISSIONERS:
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
OLD BUSINESS: None
6. NEW BUSINESS:
Kuo, Ruzicka, Tye, VC/Zirbes, Chair/Nelson
None
None
6.1 General Plan Conformity Report for Vacation of Right -of -Way (Highcrest Drive)
pursuant to Government Code Section 64502.
APRIL 11, 2000 PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION
PROJECT LOCATION: Highcrest Drive from Gold Rush Drive southerly
approximately 1,100 feet to its terminus.
PROJECT OWNER: City of Diamond Bar
APPLICANT: Highcrest Homeowners Alliance
Staff recommends that this matter be tabled.
C/Ruzicka moved, C/Tye seconded, to table the matter of General Plan Conformity Report for
Vacation of Right -of -Way (Highcrest Drive). Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES:
COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
7. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING:
Kuo, Ruzicka, Tye, VC/Zirbes, Chair/Nelson
None
None
7.1 Development Review No. 99-09, Tree Permit No. 2000-02 (pursuant to Code Section 22.48
and 22.38) is a request to construct a two-story, single-family residence of approximately 16,795
square feet, with a basement, balconies, porch, patios, indoor swimming pool and five -car
garage. In addition, the request includes accessory structures: Tennis court, rose garden with
gazebo and trellis. A tree permit is required for the removal/replacement of preserved/protected
trees. (Continued from March 28, 2000.)
PROJECT ADDRESS: 23622 Ridgeline Road, (Lot 88, Tract 30091)
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
PROPERTY OWNER: David Deng
2668 Highridge Drive, Chino Hills, CA 91709
APPLICANT: S & W Development
20547 Walnut Drive #D, Walnut, CA 91709
DSA/Smith presented staff's report. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve
_ Development Review No. 99-09 and Tree Permit No. 2000-02, Findings of Fact, and conditions
of approval as listed within the resolution.
DSA/Smith responded to VC/Tye's question regarding relocation of the tennis court as stated in
staff's original report, that in the original drawings the applicant did not provide staff with the
dimensions of the wall and it appeared that the height of the wall might exceed six feet which is
not allowed. The applicant was able to show on the revised drawing that he was able to maintain
a height of six feet which is acceptable. In addition, the mitigation of the wall with the use of
shrubbery and trees is also acceptable. Therefore, there is no need to move the wall toward the
street, which would cause the applicant to provide more grading.
APRIL 11, 2000 PAGE 3. PLANNING COMMISSION
9.
Simon Shum, architect, concurred with staff's report.
Chair/Nelson asked if it would present a problem to the applicant if he suggested that the
landscape palette not include the very invasive pompous grass.
Simon Shum•said he would comply with Chair/Nelson's request to replace the invasive grass
species with a non-invasive species to be approved by the City's staff.
Chair/Nelson re -opened the public hearing.
There being no-one who wished_to speak on this item, Chair/Nelson closed the public hearing.
C/Kuo said he did not see any provision for monitoring the replacement trees in staff's report.
DCM/DeStefano responded that the protection of the original trees was related to the previous
project.
C/Ruzicka reiterated his concern that protection should be addressed for this project as well.
DCM/DeStefano indicated that even with a covenant, without regular monitoring to insure that
the tree remains in place and that it is being properly maintained, there is no way to assure that
the trees will permanently remain in their original location. This could be accomplished through
conditions and monitoring or a covenant, which would require a change to the project's
conditions for removal of the tree in the future.' In either event, it would require ongoing
monitoring to assure that the tree/trees are in place.
C/Tye moved, VC/Zirbes seconded, to approve Development Review No. 99-9, Tree Permit
No. 2000-02, Findings of Fact, and condition of approval, as listed within the Resolution with the
amendment that the invasive species of pompous grass be replaced by a non-invasive species to
be approved by the City's staff. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES:
COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
COMNIISSIONER&
ABSENT:
COMIVIISSIONERS:
PUBLIC HEARING: None
Kuo, Ruzicka, Tye, VC/Zirbes, Chair/Nelson
None
None
PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS: C/Ruzicka congratulated staff and especially
CSD/Rose for the excellent City Birthday Party. It was the best that he has, attended.
C/Tye concurred with C/Ruzicka that the City. Birthday Party was a wonderful event.
C/Tye asked for an explanation of the monitoring of banners on City streets.
DCM/DeStefano stated that both permanent and temporary signs are regulated by City Code. The Code
Enforcement Officers monitor the signs and banners. People who post signs are required to obtain a
APRIL 11, 2000 PAGE 4 PLANNING COMMISSION
permit with a bond to insure removal of temporary signs. This requires constant monitoring by the Code
Enforcement Officers.
Chair/Nelson commented that according to the grading process, Diamond Bar's Planning Commission
fared well with respect to how it is functioning as compared with other city planning commissions.
10. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
DCM/DeStefano stated that the City broke ground yesterday for the construction of the skate park at
Peterson Park. The park is scheduled to be open to the public the second week of July. The Pulte
project (formerly SunCal) has commenced grading operations. He invited the Commissioners to attend a
tour of the site on a Friday morning about 9:00 a.m. or 10:00 a.m. Today's L.A. Times and last week's
Business Journal have been reporting positively about the development of office space in Diamond Bar.
Diamond Bar provides opportunities for office tenancy at rates that are lower than north Orange County.
SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS:
As listed in the agenda.
ADJOURNMENT:
C/Ruzicka moved, C/Tye seconded, to adjourn the meeting. There being no further business to come before the
Planning Commission, Chair/Nelson adjourned the meeting at 7:35 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
James DeStefano
Secretary to the Planning Commission
Attest:
Steve Nelson
Chairman
City of Diamond Bar
PLANNING COMMISSION
Staff Report
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 8.1
REPORT DATE: April 19, 2000
MEETING DATE: April 25, 2000
CASEXILE NUMBER: Development Review No 2000-02
APPLICATION REQUEST: Architectural design review of 127 single family
residences within the approved subdivision
identified as Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.
52267. This request also includes architectural
design review of the project's main entry and
landscaping, perimeter fencing, and walls.
PROPERTY LOCATION: 700 Block of Diamond Bar Boulevard (east side
of Diamond Bar Boulevard at Tin Drive)
PROPERTY OWNER: Pulte Home Corporation
18401 Von Karman, Suite 200
Irvine, CA 92612
APPLICANT: Scott Wright
Pulte Home Corporation
18401 Von Karman, Suite 200
Irvine, CA 92612
BACKGROUND:
The property owner/Applicant, Pulte Home Corporation, is requesting approval of Development Review
No. 2000-02. This Development Review will consider the architectural design review of 127 single family
homes within the approved subdivision identified as Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 52267, the project's
main entry and landscaping, perimeter fencing and walls.
The Conditional Use Permit No. 98-03 and Oak Tee Permit No. 98-01 for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.
52267 were previously approved by the City Council on October 6, 1998. The original approval allowed
the construction of 130 homes. However, the Final Tract Map No. 52267 was approved by the City Council
0
on February 18, 2000 and recorded thereafter. The Final Map reduced the number of homes to 127. The
approved Tract Map includes lots with approved graded buildable pads, and the Homeowners Association's
Open Space slopes and mitigation monitoring area.
The Vesting Tentative Tract Map approval allowed lot sizes ranging from 6,000 to 10,0000 square feet. The
Final Tract Map includes buildable pads ranging from 6,646 to 10,000 square feet. The street names have
been approved for the site as Skyline Drive, Canyon Vista Court, Ridgeview Court, Crestview Drive,
Ridgecrest Court, and Canyon View Court (noted as Street "D" on the Exhibit).
The project site is located at the 700 block of Diamond Bar Boulevard (east side of Diamond Bar Boi►levard
at Tin Drive). It has a General* plan land use designation of Planning Area 2/Specific Plan Overlay. The
project site is zoned Residential Planned Development -Minimum Lot Size 20,000 Square Feet -2 Units Per
Acre (RPD -20,000-2U). Generally, the following zones surround the project site: to the north and east is
the RPD -20,000-2U Zone; to the south is the Single Family Residence -Minimum Lot Size 40,000 Square
Feet (R-1-40,000) and the RPD -20,000-2U Zones; and to the west is the Single Family Residence -Minimum
Lot Size 8,000 Square Feet (R-1-8000) Zone.
ANALYSIS:
REVIEW AUTHORITY
This Development Review application for architectural design review is by the Planning Commission. Per
the City Council Condition of Approval 4(b.)(8.) of Resolutions No. 98-59 and No. 98-60: "all residential
dwelling units are required to obtain Development Review approval." Also, pursuant to the City's
Development Code Section 22.48.020, a Development Review application is required for residential projects
that propose four dwelling units or more (detached or attached) and that involve the issuance of a Building
Permit for new construction on a vacant parcel. Therefore, Developmeni Review is required.
® Development Standards
This project's overall design is influenced by the conditions of approval as set forth in the City Council
Resolutions No. 98-59 and 98-60 that outline specific Development Standards relating to setbacks, elevation
style, varying plane and appearance. These are as follows:
1. Front yard setbacks shall be a minimum of 20 feet from the front property line. Architectural
styles/front elevations shall vary. The same style front elevation shall not be utilized on adjacent
homes. The homes shall provide a perspective along a street that utilizes varying plane, giving
.the appearance of varying setbacks;
2. Side yard setbacks shall be a minimum of 5 feet and 10 feet from the edge of the building
pad/property line and the distance between dwelling units shall be a minimum of 15 feet; ,
3. Rear yard setbacks shall be a minimum of 20 feet from the buildable pad or property line,
whichever is greater; proposed two story homes to be located upon the perimeter lots shall
maintain a 30 foot rear yard setback from the edge of the building pad in order to reduce view
and aesthetic impacts from adjacent properties;
4. Maximum building height shall not exceed two stories and 35 feet;
5. Fencing at the rear of perimeter residential lots shall consist of three-foot high decorative block
walls with wrought iron, glass, or open work fencing not to exceed three feet to reduce view and
aesthetic impacts. Additionally, the perimeter fencing shall allow for the movement of on-site
wildlife. (The proposed perimeter fencing does not consist of three foot high decorate block wall
with wrought iron, glass, or openwork. However, the perimeter fencing meets the intent of this
condition to achieve the overall goal to allow view, aesthetics and to allow wildlife access.)
The above listed development standards must be complied with and are incorporated into this current
application for architectural design review of the proposed single family residences with further details of
architectural features.
The proposed project will be in a gated community identified as Diamond Hills. The architectural design
consists of various elements: 1.) building footprint placement, setbacks, and heights; 2.) building size; 3.)
floor plan layout options; 4.) parking/garages; 5.) architectural style and proposed number/mix; 6.)
materials/colors; 7.) facade and roof articulation; 8.) front yard landscaping;. 9.) Buyer's Awareness; 10.)
perimeter fencing and walls; 11.) main entry and landscaping; 12.) sales model homes; 13.) construction
phasing. Staff has outlined the specific design related items and is providing background information for
the Planning Commission's consideration.
L Building Footprint Placement, Setbacks, and Height
Staff reviewed the site plan layout of the proposed lots, which included the building footprint placement on
each lot. The proposed building footprints appear to be placed in uniform rows. However, staff believes
the proposed building footprints should be staggered. This requires varying front and rear yard setbacks.
The proposed building footprints meet the minimum front and rear yard setbacks as required by the
Conditional Use Permit for Tract No. 52267. Staff noted there maybe greater flexibility with adjusting
setbacks for lots, which contain a rear yard of more than 30 feet. It is more difficult to adjust setbacks on
perimeter lots that require a minimum 30 -foot rear yard setback.
By staggering the building footprints, the visual impact of the homes as seen from the street appear less
massive. The Applicant will be required to submit a precise model plan that indicates revisions to the
placement of the proposed building foots to be reviewed and approved by the City's Planning Division. The
building'foot prints shall be placed on the lots so that the single family residences are offset and have varying
front/rear yard setbacks (see condition 5(g)).
Additionally, the Applicant will also address issues for some side yard setbacks. The minimum distance
between dwelling units is 15 feet. Each single family home should maintain a minimum of 5 feet on one
side and 10 feet on the other side from the -buildable pad's edge/property line. There are two administrative
processes for adjusting setbacks. One method involves a Yard Modification and another the Lot Line
3
Adjustment that allows for a property line adjustment to the recorded map. As a result, staff will process
either the Yard Modification or Lot Line Adjustment approvals as necessary (see condition 5(c)).
Pursuant to the Conditional Use Permit for Tract No. 52267, the maximum height of the structure is two
stories and 35 feet. The proposed heights of the single family homes range from 28.5 feet to 33 feet.
2. Dwelling Size
The Applicant proposes two product. types identified as Product Type .1 and Product Type 2. Product Type
1 is designed by Design Alliance Architects (HOVE). Product Type 2 is designed by Mark Gross
Associates, Inc. (MGA).
The following table includes detail on the dwelling size.
Product Type 1 (HOVE)
Options for Increased Square
Footage
Floor Plan 1
First Floor
1,975 square feet
Loft 200 square feet
(6 bedrooms with options,
Second Floor
1,980 square feet
plus loft)
Total
3,955 square feet
Garage conversion to bedroom/bath
200 square feet
Garage
3 car — 20'x20'
- 20'x 10'
Floor Plan 2
First Floor
2,105 square feet
(8 bedrooms with options)
Second Floor
2,200 square feet
Total
4,305 square feet
Garage
3 car — 23'x20'
Garage conversion to bedroom/bath
- 20'x 12'
den/office 240 square feet
Floor Plan 3
First Floor
2,255 square feet
(6 bedrooms with options,
Second Floor
2,440 square feet
plus den)
Total
4,695 square feet
Garage
3 car — 20'x20'
Garage conversion to workshop
- 13'x 10'
Product Type 2 (MGA)
Floor Plan 1
First Floor
1,763 square feet
Bonus Room or Game
(6 bedrooms with options,
Second Floor
1,603 square feet
Room/Bedroom 474 square feet
plus game room)
Total
3,366 square feet
increase option
Garage conversion to bedroom/bath
Garage
3 car — 20'x20'
186 square feet to game room 224
- 19' x10'
square feet
Floor Plan 2
First Floor
1,786 square feet
Loft 156 square feet increase option
(6 bedrooms with options,
Second Floor
1,659 square feet
plus loft)
Total
3,445 square feet
Garage
3 car — 20'x20'
- 15'x 10'
4
Floor Plan 3
First Floor
1,786 square feet
Second Floor
1.794 square feet
Total
3,580 square feet
Garage conversion to bedroom
Garage
3 car — 20' x 20'
Game Room/Sewing Room 189
- 16.5'x 12'
square feet
The larger HOVE units are placed on Canyon Vista Court, Skyline Drive, and Ridgeview Court and are
generally at the higher elevations of the tract. The smaller MGA units are placed on Crestview Drive;
Ridgecrest Court and Canyon View Court and are at the lower elevations. By doing this, the mass of the
larger structures appear smaller and are not as prevalently seen from afar.
3. Floorplan Layout Options
Floorplan layout options are provided, which were meant to cater to the needs of the homebuyer. The
proposed plans include floor plan options that do not increase the residential structure's square footage or
alter the structure's building footprint. These options include a larger nook/kitchen bay area, wok kitchen,
fireplaces, and decks. The options also include the following room conversions: library to bedroom, game
room to bedroom/bath, bedroom suite to two bedrooms, bedroom suite to smaller bedroom/den/bath,
bedrooms/bath to bunk room, den to bedroom/bath, den to sitting room. The proposed options provide the
homebuyer with a variety of choices to compliment their living needs.
4. Parking/Garages
The options that convert garage space to livable space reduce the amount of available on-site parking. The
Development Code requires a minimum fully enclosed, two car garage. However, staff anticipates a
potentially significant need for more parking because of the proposed number of bedrooms. In reviewing
past projects, staff noted that the number of proposed bedrooms is related to the number of needed parking
spaces. It is anticipated the bedrooms will likely be occupied by adults, which in turn, are each likely to
drive their own vehicle. By allowing an optional added bedroom, there will be some floor plan layouts that
contain six bedrooms with two car garages and/or as many as eight bedrooms with three car garages. In these
cases, . staff believes a two car garage and/or three car garage may not provide a sufficient amount of
available parking. As a part of this project's conditions of approval, the Applicant shall provide a minimum
three car garage for single family residences with six or more bedrooms (see condition 5 (v)).
Additionally, the City's Development Code requires a minimum sized garage bay dimension of 10 feet by
20 feet. Plans so noted with lesser dimensions do not meet Development Code standards. As a part of this
project's conditions of approval, the Applicant shall submit plans delineating the garage dimensions are a
minimuin of 10 feet in width and 20 feet in depth for each vehicle space (see condition 5 (w)).
Staff has met with the Applicant to address the concerns related to the anticipated demand for on -street
parking and a need for a parking hierarchy. Therefore, the Applicant intends to add a provision to the
Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions (CC&R's) to prioritize the parking of residents as follows: 1) garage
parking, 2) park in the driveway, and 3) on -street parking. A condition of approval, 5(u), requires the
5
parking hierarchy as a part of the recorded CC&R's. The Applicant will also be required to submit said
CC&R's to the City's Planning Division.
5. Architectural Styles and Proposed Number/Mix
® Architectural Styles
The Applicant proposes two product types identified as Product Type I and Product Type 2. Product Type
1 is .designed by Design Alliance Architects (HOVE). This product type has three floor plan layouts
referenced 1, 2 3. Each floor plan can be built in one of three architectural styles referenced A, B, C. These
architectural styles are: Mediterranean terranean (A),
Spanish (B), or French Country (C).
Product Type 2 is designed by Mark Gross Associates, Inc. (MGA). This product type has three floor plan
layouts referenced 1,2,3. Each floor plan can be built in one of three architectural styles referenced A, B,
or C: These are: Contemporary (A), Spanish (B), or Monterey (C).
A tract development of single family residences implies there will be a repetition of design. However, the
Applicant achieves variation with respect to architectural style, by adding treatments and elevations to create
distinct designs. The Applicant also provides reverse floor plan layouts to further achieve variation.
Moreover, the treatments utilized for each single family residence will vary to add visual interest so that no
two single family residences located next to one another or directly across the street will look the same. The
following table represents the current mix of plan models and elevation styles:
AJYimh,orlMiy
PLAN
QUANTITY
QUANTITY WITH
FLOOR PLAN
REVERSE
Plan 1, HOVE
8 Total
5 Total
(A) Mediterranean
5
1
(B) Spanish
3
4
(C) French Country
None noted
None noted
Plan 2, HOVE
15 Total
11 Total
(A) Mediterranean
10
10
(B) Spanish
5
1
(C) French Country
None noted
None noted
Plan 3, HOVE
16 Total
14 Total
(A) Mediterranean
None noted
None noted
(B) Spanish
None noted
None noted
(C) French Country
None noted .......
None noted
Plan 1, MGA
11 Total
8 Total
(A) Contemporary
4
None noted
(B) Spanish
7
8
(C) Monterey
None noted
None noted
E.,
Plan 2, MGA
6
14
(A) Contemporary
None noted
None noted
(B) Spanish
None noted
None noted
(C) Monterey
None noted
None noted
Plan 3 MGA
9
10
(A) Contemporary
6
7
(B) Spanish
3
3
(C) Monterey
None noted
None noted
TOTALS 127
165
162
Presently the submitted plans identify model plans next to one another. The site plan does not indicate the
different elevation styles available. For example, Plan 1 HOVE shows no French Country (C) in the mix
of homes. The Applicant is aware that the City requires additional variation and a revised site plan showing
a complete mix. Therefore, it is a condition of approval that prior to the issuance of a building permit, the
Applicant will submit a copy of a precise model plan which will include placement of each building
footprint and architectural style for review and approval by the City's Planning Division (see condition 5(f)).
As noted previously, the larger HOVE homes are at the higher elevations than the smaller MGA homes.
6. Materials/Colors
The Applicant proposes twelve different color schemes for two product types using an earth tone palette of
colors. Bright and/or reflective colors and materials were avoided. The exterior wall materials consists of
off-white, light and darker beige, grays, and sandstone stuccos. The accent colors utilized for trim, fascia,
shutters, wrought iron, and doors as well as accents are varying shades of earth tones, gray, green, and blues.
There is a selection of earth tone stone veneer accents from El Dorado including Bordeaux country rubble,
Chateau country rubble, Serrano country rubble and Tuscany country rubble. The roof materials consist of
"S" shaped and flat concrete tiles, depending on elevation style, in shades of earth tones and gray. The use
of stone, stucco popouts, shutters, arches, balconies and wrought iron will enhance and support the
individual project while being consistent with the character of adjacent neighborhoods. Moreover, the colors
utilized for each single family residence will vary to add visual interest so that no two single family
residences located next to one another or directly across the street will look the same.
The City recognizes that future buyer's may desire to choose the architectural style and colors of their home.
It is the City's desire to have a mixed variety of colors and architectural styles throughout the project.
Therefore, a condition of approval requires that prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Applicant will
submit a copy of a precise model plan which will include placement of each building footprint, architectural
style, and the colors for review and approval by the City's Planning Division (see condition 5(f)).
7. Facade and Roof Articulation
The elevations for each plan demonstrate good roof and wall articulation. Each elevation demonstrates
diverse wall placement by utilizing wall projections that provide depth variations.
N
Varying roof articulations are achieved by changes in roof planes and through the use of traditional roof
forms such as gables and hips.
8. Front Yard Landscaping
The Applicant has informed staff of their intent to provide the front yard landscaping/irrigation with the
construction of the home. This adds value to the project and aesthetic appeal. However, staff has not
received plans delineating the type of planting materials, color, size, quantity and location, for review and
approval by the City. In previous tract approvals, there has been a condition of approval to allow the
applicant 60 days to submit to the Planning Division for review and approval. A like condition has been
provided (see condition 5(x)) as well as the standard condition that no fences, walls, and other structures
located within the front yard setback will exceed 42" in height (see condition 5(s)).
9. Buyer's Awareness
Per the Tract's Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Tract Map approvals, a Buyer's Awareness program
was established. The Applicant is required to give each buyer a copy of the Buyer's Awareness Package,
document their receipt of the same in the escrow instructions of each lot, and to document their receipt to
the City (see condition 5(t)).
10. Perimeter Fencing and Walls
The applicant has submitted the perimeter fencing as six feet high wrought iron between six feet high stone
pilasters. Per Conditional Use Permit and Vesting Tentative Tract No. 52267 approvals, this submittal
achieves the overall intent for fencing by being aesthetically pleasing, allowing unobstructed views and
meeting the criteria for wildlife access.
The site plan indicates retaining walls will be located within the side. yard area between lots. The Public
Works Division upon submittal will process permits for these walls. Materials will be required to be
decorative in nature (see condition 5 (e)). Additionally, Staff recommends that the Applicant install
retaining walls to allow for larger side yard areas for pedestrian access. Generally speaking, the maximum
height for retaining walls is six feet, however, in these areas of varying topographical features the Director
may approve additional height up to one foot. Regardless of the height of the retaining wall, an open-work,
non -view obscuring fence may be erected at the top of the retaining wall for safety protection to a maximum
height of 42 inches. Staff will work with the Applicant to ensure the type of retaining wall installed is
appropriate in design and location.
11. Main Entry Plan and Landscaping
The primary access to the Diamond Hills gated community is on Diamond Bar Boulevard at Tin Drive. As
a primary access, this will be the daily, regular ingress and egress for residents. The primary access main
entry plan includes a two story, Mediterranean. style guardhouse as a central focal point at the entrance. The
proposed primary access main entry is consistent with the style and color palette used for the single family
homes. Therefore, it complements the overall design of the neighborhood and promotes a high quality
aesthetic appeal.
The secondary access is proposed at Highcrest Drive and the Applicant has determined the gate will serve
as an emergency access only. This secondary access is guaranteed through the original tract's approval.
Staff is recommending that the secondary access gate design should complement the design of the primary
access gate similarly to the entry gate review for Parcel Map No. 23382 in "The Country Estates."
Additionally, the applicant needs to submit details to indicate whether or not the gate has a remote, call box,
and/or manned gate with guard person. The City, Sheriff's Department, and Fire Department.to ensure there
are no problems related to safety and.the available capacity for vehicles will review this submittal.
Both entries will include landscaping/irrigation, sidewalks, ledge stone walls, gates, stone or enhanced
��.oncrete paving in earth tones, and community entry monuments. Also, the landscaping for thrnain entry
contains ornamental plant species, as well as plant species approved by the subdivision's mitigation
monitoring program on the slopes.
The Applicant has not yet specified the type and precise locations of the gates to be installed for the primary
access and secondary access. These items are a part of this project's conditions of approval, the Applicant
shall submit details on the type and precise location of the primary and secondary gates to be installed and
the secondary access gate be consistent with decorative nature of the main entry for the City's review and
approval (see condition 5(z)).
At the present time, the Applicant has also not submitted any plans for an entry monument sign or wall sign.
A separate application will be required for the City's review and approval.
12. Sales Models
There are three sales models for each product type. The larger sized, Product Type 1 (Hove) models are on
Lot Nos. 2, 3, and 4 along Canyon Vista Court. The customer parking lot for this grouping is located on Lot
No. 5. The smaller sized, Product Type 2 (MGA) models are on Lot Nos. 124, 125, and 126 along Canyon
View Court. The customer parking lot for this grouping is located on Lot No. 123.
13. Construction Phasing
The Staff anticipates this project will consist of construction phases. Therefore, prior to construction of the
homes, the Applicant shall submit a Phasing Plan delineating the quantity, location, and schedule for
construction (see condition 50)).
CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT/STAGING
This project will involve the use of construction vehicles and other equipment. The grading of the lots has
already commenced. At this time, the construction vehicles and equipment have been placed close to the
end of Highcrest Drive. Furthermore, food service vehicles have been utilizing the same area to_cater to the
construction workers. Staff has concerns related to the noise and view impacts related to the construction
OJ
activities that may adversely affect the nearby residents on Highcrest Drive. Staff has informed the
Applicant that the construction vehicles, equipment, food service vehicles, and other construction related
activities be relocated. Also, staff informed the Applicant that a green screen should also be installed to
minimize view impacts. A site visit indicates the green screen has been installed. As a part of this project's
conditions of approval, the applicant shall submit a plan which indicates relocation of the construction
vehicles, equipment, food service vehicles, and other construction related activities for the City's review and
approval (see condition (aa)).
ADDITIONAL REVIEW
The Public Works Division and the Building and Safety Division reviewed this project. Their comments
are included in the conditions of approval.
CONCLUSION:
The proposed 127 homes comply with the Vesting Tentative Tract Maps' Conditional Use Permit's and Oak
Tree Permit's approval, the General Plan's vision for new residential development (Strategies 1. 1.9, 1.6. 1 (b),
1.2.4, and 3.2.3), the City's Development Code and Design Guidelines. The various incorporated design
elements, landscaping and entries contribute to the project's character. Furthermore, the proposed project
is consistent with the character of adjacent neighborhoods.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING:
This item has been advertised in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin
newspapers on April 14, 2000. Public Hearing notices were mailed to 940 property owners of record within
a 1,000 -foot radius of the project site on April 14, 2000. A notice of public hearing on a display board was
posted at the site on April 14, 2000 and displayed for at least 10 days before the public hearing. Three other
public places were posted within the vicinity of the application.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT:
The environmental evaluation shows that the proposed project is consistent with the previously certified
Environmental Impact Report No.97-2 for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 52267 according to the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA) and guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant
to Section 15162(a) of Article 11 of California Code of Regulations. No further environmental review is
required.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review No. 2000-02, Findings of
Fact and conditions of approval as listed within the attached resolution.
11 I 191 NJ 10
1. The design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, development
standards of the applicable district, design guidelines, and architectural criteria for specialized area (e.g.,
theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards, or planned developments);
2. The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of
neighboring existing or future development, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards;
3. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the characteristics of the
surrounding neighborhood and will maintain and enhance the harmonious orderly and attractive
development contemplated by Chapter 22.48, the General Plan, City Design Guidelines, or any
applicable specific plan. It is also consistent with the Conditional Use Permit, Oak Tree Permit and
Vesting Tentative Tract Map approvals,
4. The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and
visiting public; as well as, its neighbors. through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, and color that
will remain aesthetically appealing;
5. The proposed project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially
injurious (e.g., negative affect on property values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or
improvements in the vicinity; and
6. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Prepared by: --
Ann Lungu Sonya oe V Linda Smith
Associate Planner Development Service Assistant Development Service Assistant
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Draft Resolution of Approval;
2. Application;
3. Exhibit "A" - site plan, floor plans, elevations, entry and landscape pian, fencing and wail plan, and
materials/color's boards, dated April 25, 2000; and
4. Letter from Applicant dated April 13, 2000.
11
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
NO. 2000-02, A REQUEST FOR ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
REVIEW OF 127 * SINGLE FAMILY HOMES- WITHIN
APPROVED VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NAP NO: 52267.
ADDITIONALLY, THE REQUEST INCLUDES .THE MAIN
ENTRY AND LANDSCAPING; PERIMERTER FENCING AND
WALLS. THE PROJECT -SITE IS LOCATED AT THE 700
BLOCK OF DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD (EAST SIDE OF
DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD AT TIN DRIVE), DIAMOND
.BAR, CA 91765.
A. RECITALS
1. The property owner/applicant, Pulte Home Corporation, has
filed an application for Development Review No. 2000-02,
for a property located at the 700 Block of Diamond Bar
Boulevard (east side of Diamond Bar Boulevard at Tin
Drive), Diamond Bar, Los Angeles County, California, as
described in the title of this Resolution. This
application request is controlled by Conditional Use
Permit No. 98-03 and Oak Tree Permit No; 98-01 for
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 52267 which was approved
by the City Council on October 6, 1998. Subsequently,
the Final Tract Map No. 52267 was approved by the City
Council on February 18, 2000, and recorded thereafter.
Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development
Review is referred to as the "Application".
2. Notification of the public hearing for this project was
provided in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and Inland
Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers on April 14, 2000.
Public hearing notices were mailed to 940 property owners
of record within a 1,000 -foot radius of the project on
April 14, 2000. Furthermore, the project site was posted
with a display board on April 14, 2000. Three other
sites were posted within the vicinity of this
application.
3. The Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar on
April 25, 2000 conducted a duly noticed public hearing on
the Application.
I
B. RESOLUTION j]
NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved
the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as
follows:
1. This Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that
all of the facts set forth in the.Recitals, Part A, of
this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The Planning Commission hereby finds that the project
identified. above in this Resolution is consistent with
the previously certified Environmental Impact Report No.
97-2 for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 52267 according
to the California Environmental Quality Act of. 1970
(CEQA) and guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to
Section 15162(a) of Article 11 of the California Code of
Regulations. No further environmental review is
required.
3. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds and
determines that, having considered the record as a whole
including the findings set forth below, and changes and
alterations which have been incorporated into and
conditioned upon the proposed project set forth in the
application, there is no evidence before the Planning
Commission that the project proposed herein will have the
potential of an adverse effect on wild life resources or
the habitat upon which the wild life depends. Based upon
substantial evidence, this Planning Commission hereby
rebuts the presumption of adverse effects contained in
Section 753.5 (d) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth herein,
this Planning Commission hereby finds as follows:
(a) The project relates to previously approved Vesting
Tentative Tract Map No. 52267, Conditional Use
Permit No. 98-03, and Oak Tree Permit No. 98"01, on
approximately 65 acres. The subdivision approvals
included lots with graded buildable pads, and the
Homeowner Association's Open . Space slopes and
mitigation monitoring area.
(b) The project site has a General Plan land use
designation of Planning Area 2/Specific Plan
Overlay.
9
(c). The project site is zoned Res i dent 1 P14,nnld'
Development-Minimum Lot Size-20,000 square
Units Per Acre(RPD- 20,000-2U).
(d) Generally, the following zones and uses surround the
project site: to the north and east is the RPD -
20,000 -2U Zone; to the south is the Single Family
Residence -Minimum Lot Size 40,000 Square Feet (R-1-
40,000) and the RPD -20,000-2U Zone; and to the west
is the Single Family Residence -Minimum Lot Size
8,000 Square Feet (R-1-8,000) Zone.
(e) The project involves architectural design review of
127 two story single family homes within a gated
community identified as "Diamond Hills". There are
six floor plans ranging from approximately 3,366
square feet to 7,135 square feet, with two and three
car garages and additional floor plan options. Each
floor. plan has three architectural styles including
Mediterranean, Spanish, French Country, Monterey,
and Contemporary. Additionally, the design review
includes the main entry and landscaping, perimeter
fencing and walls.
(f) The design and layout of the proposed development
are consistent with the General Plan, development
standards of the applicable district, design
guidelines, and architectural criteria for special
areas (e.g. theme areas, specific plans, community
plans, boulevards or planned developments).
The proposed project implements the conditions
required in the previously approved Conditional Use
Permit No. 98-03, and Oak Tree Permit No. 98-01 for
Vesting Tentative Tract No. 52267. The proposed
project complies also with the City's General Plan
objectives and strategies specifically related to
maintaining the integrity of residential
neighborhoods and open space. Furthermore, the
proposed project meets the intent - of the City's
Design Guidelines and is compatible with the
eclectic architectural style and design, materials,
and colors of existing homes within the surrounding
area.
(g) The design of the proposed development will not
interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring
existing or future developments, and will not create
traffic or pedestrian hazards.
3
L
Diamond Bar Boulevard adequately serves the project
site. Moreover, Environriiental Impact Report No. 97-
2 for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 52267,
certified by the .City on October 6, 1998, addresses
the design and layout of the neighborhood as well as
the flow of pedestrian and vehicular traffic.
(h) The architectural design of the proposed development
is compatible with the character of the.. surrounding
neighborhood and will maintain and enhance the
harmonious, orderly, and attractive development
contemplated by this Chapter, the General Plan, or
any applicable specific plan.
As mentioned in Item (g), the proposed project meets
the goals and objectives contemplated in the City's
General Plan for harmonious, orderly, and attractive
development. Staff has considered the surrounding
character including harmonious building style, form,
size, color, material and roofline. Staff has also
considered the design of the project's main entry
and landscaping, perimeter fencing, and walls to
compliment the style of the proposed single family
residences. Therefore, the proposed proj•ect's
architectural design is compatible with the eclectic
architectural style of other homes within adjacent
areas.
Additionally, the proposed colors and materials
blend with the natural. environment by utilizing an
earthtone palette of colors. Bright and/or
reflective colors and materials were. avoided.
Moreover, the colors utilized for each single family
residence will vary to add visual interest so that
no two single family residences located next to one
another or directly across the street will look the
same. As a result, the proposed colors and
materials utilized are compatible with the variation
of surrounding homes in adjacent neighborhoods.
(i) The design of the proposed development will provide
a desirable environment for its occupants and
visiting public as well as its neighbors through
good aesthetic use of materials, texture and color,
and will remain aesthetically appealing.
Project - colors /materials boards were submitted to
the City. The colors, materials, and textures
4
proposed are
within the are
of maintenance
six different
architectural
design feel.
consist of ea
materials/colt
and dark beigo
There is a !
accents inclui
country rubble
country rubbl
fascia, shuttE
accent colors
grays, browns
submitted mate
consists of F1
complimentary to the existing homes
i while offering variety and low level
. Each product design will also have
color schemes for application to each
style to provide a semi -customized
. The exterior wall material will
rth tones as shown on the submitted
-s boards including off-white, light
, gray, and sandstone colored stucco.
election of El Dorado stone veneer
ing Bordeaux country rubble, Chateau
Serrano country, rubble, and Tuscany
The colors utilized for trim,
:s, wrought iron, and doors as well as
are varying shades of earth tones,
greens and blues as shown on the
rials/colors board. The roof material
at Slate Tile and Low Profile "S" tile
in shades of complimentary earth tone colors.
Furthermore, the use of stone accents, shutters,
balconies, and wrought iron will enhance and support
the individual design schemes and create a semi -
custom feel to the proposed project, while being
consistent with the character of adjacent
neighborhoods. Therefore, the design of the
proposed development will provide a desirable
environment for its occupants and visiting public as
well as its neighbors. Therefore, the design of the
proposed development will provide a desirable
environment for its occupants and visiting public.
(j) The proposed development will not be detrimental to
the public health, safety or welfare or materially
injurious (e.g., negative affect on property values
or resale(s) of property) to the properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
Before the issuance of any City permits, the
proposed project is required to comply with all
conditions within the approved resolution.
Additionally, the proposed project is required to
comply with the Building and Safety Division and
Public Works Division requirements. As a result, it
is not anticipated that the proposed project will be
detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare
or materially injurious to the properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
5
(k) The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance
with the provisions of the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA).
Pursuant to the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City has
determined that this project is consistent with the
previously certified Environmental Impact Report No.
97-2 for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 52267.
5. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth above
the Planning Commission hereby approves the
Application subject to the following conditions:
(a) The project shall substantially conform to site
plan, floor plans, elevations, entry and landscape
plan, fencing and wall plans, materials/colors
boards, collectively labeled as Exhibit "A" and
dated April 25, 2000, as submitted, amended herein,
and approved by the Planning Commission.
(b) The site shall be maintained in a condition, which
is free of debris both during and after the
construction, addition, or implementation of the
entitlement granted herein. The removal of all
trash, debris, and refuse, whether during or
subsequent to construction shall be doneonlyby the
property owner, applicant or by duly permitted waste
contractor, who has been authorized by the City to
provide collection, transportation, and disposal of
solid waste from residential, commercial,
construction, and industrial areas within the City.'
It shall be the applicant's obligation to ensure
that the waste contractor utilized has obtained
permits from the City of Diamond Bar to provide such
services.
(c) The applicant shall submit to the Planning
Division/Public Works Division for review and
approval administrative Yard Modification and/or Lot
Line Adjustment applications on those lots as
required to meet the minimum setback requirements to
the buildable pad/property line before the issuance
of building permits.
(d) The applicant shall obtain a grading permit for any
lot with cut and fill quantities of 50 cubic yards
or greater to be submitted for review and approval
6
" -0
it
L L L:
by the Public Works Division. on each lot's grading
plan, the following shall be delineated:
(1) Cut and fill quantities and calculations;
(2) All flow lines, finished surfaces, and finished
grades;
(3) Proper drainage with detailed sketches;
(4) All easements and restrictions on the precise
grading plan. Permanent structures shall not
be built over any easement; and
(5) Location of all retaining walls, also noting
top 'of wall, top of footing, and finished
surfaces.
(e) Retaining walls shall be designed to create a larger
side yard area between structures to allow for
pedestrian access. The Director may approve wall
heights to a maximum height of seven feet in these
areas of varying topography. The walls shall be
decorative and reviewed and approved by the Public
Works Division. Regardless of the height of the
retaining wall, an open-work, non -view obscuring
fence may be erected at the top of the retaining
wall for safety protection to a maximum height of 42
inches.
(f) The applicant shall submit a precise model plan that
indicates revisions to the placement of the proposed
building foots, architectural style/elevation, and
colors to be reviewed and approved by the City's
Planning Division prior to the issuance of any
retaining wall or building permits. The building
foot prints shall be placed on the lots so that the
single family residences are offset and have varying
front/rear yard setbacks.
(g) Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the
applicant shall submit a site plan, which delineates
all street addresses including the model homes for
the City's review and approval.
(h) Driveway slopes shall not exceed 15 percent.
(i) Prior to the Building and Safety Division's final
inspection, fine -grading certifications shall be
provided to the City.
(j) Prior to construction commencement, the applicant
shall submit a phasing plan delineating the
7
..quantity, location, and schedule for construction of
the 127 single family residences.
(k) Building setbacks shall meet the Uniform Building
Code Section 18-1-1. The setback measurement from
the of toe slope shall be calculated by H/2, but
shall not exceed 15 feet and setback measurement
from the top of slope shall be calculated by H/3,
but shall not exceed 40 feet.
(1) The single family structure shall meet the State -and
Local. Building Codes (i.e. 1997 Uniform Building
Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform. Mechanical
Code, and the 1996 National Electrical Code)
requirements and Fire Department requirements.
(m) The minimum design wind pressure shall be 80 miles
per hour and "C" exposure.
(n) The single family structure is located in Fire Zone
40 and shall meet all requirements of the following
requirements:
(I) All roof coverings shall -be "Fire Retardant".
Tile roofs shall be fire stopped at the eaves
to preclude entry of the flame to members;
(2) All unenclosed under floor areas shall be
constructed as exterior walls;
(3) All openings into the attic, floor and/or other
enclosed areas shall be'covered with corrosion
resistant wire mesh not less than IA inch nor
more than 1/2 inch in any dimension except where
such openings.are equipped with sash or door;
(4) Chimneys shall have spark arrestors of maximum
1/2 inch screen.
(o) This single family structure shall meet the State
Energy Conservation Standards.
(p) Drainage pattern shall be reviewed and approved by
the Public Works Division; surface water shall drain
away from the building at a 2% minimum slope.
(q) All plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire
Department.
(r) Pools, spas, gazebos, decks and all other accessory
structures shall require separate permits.
8
(s) Fences,, walls, and all other structures "locked
within the front yard setback shall not exceed 42"
in height.
(t) The applicant shall submit to the City written
evidence indicating the buyer's receipt of the
"Buyer's Awareness Package" as required by the
Planning Division.
(u)' The applicant shal 1 . amend the Diamond -Hills
Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&RIs) to
indicate 'that residents shall be required to
prioritize their use of available parking in the
following order: 1) garage parking, 2) driveway
parking, 3) street parking and submit a copy toV.the
City for review and approval prior to recordation by
the Los Angeles County Recorder.
(v) The applicant shall provide a minimum three car
garage for single family residences with six or more
bedrooms.
(w) Prior to the issuance of any City permits, the
applicant shall submit revised plans to indicate the
garage dimensions have a minimum depth of 20 feet
and width of 10 feet for each vehicle space.
(x) The applicant shall submit a front yard
landscape/ irrigation plan for each individual lot,
delineating the type of planting 'materials, co0r,.
size, quantity and location, for review and approval
by the City. The landscaping/ irrigation shall be
-installed prior to the Planning Division's final
inspection or Certificate of occupancy's issuance.
(y) The applicant shall comply with the Planning,
Building and Safety and Public Works Divisions, and
Fire Department requirements.
(z) The Applicant shall submit to the Planning Division
for review and, approval the type, details for
installation, and precise locations of the gates for
primary and secondary access. Additionally, the
secondary access gate shall be consistent with the
decorative nature of the main entry.
(aa) The applicant shall submit a plan, which indicates
relocation of the construction vehicles, equipment,
food service vehicles, and other construction
9
related activities for the
approval.
C i ty s W' &and
(bb) This grant is valid for two years and shall be
exercised within that period or this grant shall
expire. A one-year extension of time may be
approved when submitted to the City in writing at
least 60 days prior to the expiration date. The
Deputy City Manager may consider the extension
request at duly noticed public hearing in accordance
with Chapter 22.72 of the' City of Diamond Bar
Development Code.
(cc) This grant shall not be effective for any purpose
until the permittee and owner of the property
involved (if other than the permittee) have filed
within fifteen (15) days of approval of this grant,
at the City of Diamond Bar Community and Development
Services Department, their affidavit stating that
they are aware of and agree to accept all the
conditions of this grant. Furthermore, this grant
shall not be effective until the permittee pays the
remaining City processing fees.
(dd) If the Department of Fish and Game determines. that
Fish and Game Code Section 711.4 applies to the
approval of this project, then the applicant shall
remit to the City, within five days of this grant's
approval, a cashier's check of $25.00 for a
documentary handling fee in connection with Fish and
Game Code requirements. Furthermore, if this
project is not exempt from a filing fee imposed
because the project has more than a deminimus impact
on fish and wildlife, the applicant shall also pay
to the Department of Fish and Game any such fee and
any fine which the Department
The Planning Commission shall:
(a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and
(b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this
Resolution, by certified mail to: Scott
Wright, Pulte Home Corporation, 18401 Von
Karman, Suite 200, Irvine, CA 92612.
10
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR.
1W
Steve Nelson, Chairman
:zz
APRIL 2000, BY THE PLANNING
I, James DeStefano, Deputy City Manager,' do hereby certify that
the foregoing 'Resolution was duly introduced, passed and -adopted
by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar, at a
regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day
of April 2000, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
BY:
James DeStefano, Secretary
11
CITY OF D7.- "40ND BAR
comm rry .VELOPMENTr DEPARTUU4T
21660 T. Copley Drive Suite 190
(909)396 5676 Fax (909)8613117
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION
Record Owner
NameSun Cal Companies
(gist name amo
FPL 11
Deposit S =�
Receipt#
By _;.
Date Reed
LE3 -2 ^•�i
Applicant Applicant's Agent
Pulte Home Corp.
(Last name mist) (LLn name fust)
Suite n� 1840 Von Karmari� , Ste. "'n
Addrrss5109 � E. La•_Palma, _ ,
City Anaheim CA 4
Zip 92806 (Todd Kurt —n
Phonc( ) (714)693-6700
Irvine., ' CA
4��19 (Score SJrieh_t'_1
7y7- yyac
Phonc( ) (949)'x$9-4400
Phone{ )
NOTE: It is rite applicant's responsibility to natify the Community Deveiopaient Director is writing of any change of the
principals involved during the processing of this eue
(Anach a soparatc sheet, if necessary, ineludine names, addresses, and signatures of members of paA'netships. joint ventures, and d'trsctora
of corporations.)
Consent: I certify th I m the inner of th r -due+ ed p�pe113' Q pe '� the apf licmu to file this request.
Date / (p 2�f �
Signed•
Cerrificatron: I, the undersigned, hereby eerdlfy under penalty of peduiy that the information herein provided is correct
to the best of my knowledge.
Print Name J' C- o 74 Wet a L, Y
(Applifant or Agent)
Signed. --2. Date 1�n
(AppL or Agcat)
Location Trac t - 5 2 2f#7
(Street address or tract and lot number)
Zoning RPD -20,000-2 Plarnine ATPS 7 171\ln —
Previous Cases CUP 98-03 Oaktree Permit 09-01
Present Use of Site Vacant Cup 09-03 Oaktree Permir. 09---nL iracrina Tract MWO 52767
BIR 97—?_
Use applied for
roposod
Legal descripdon (all ownersb1p C . �riSiag the P
loe(s)/parcet(s)) -
Vesting Tentative Ma
St267
Atm devoted to stxuctur es (See p 10 r n 1 arm
Lwd5=pzn8/Open apace
Proposed deosiry
Size 1
Project 27 Units Lot Coverage Se p n (Units/Acus)
Stvlo
Style of ArchitactuTO See e1 eva .i o
Propo
Numberpf Floors s 2 Stoz
Slope of Roof S®va r i r'
If yes, Quantity
Gradiag
Cut 1.8 Million F,
Import N A If yes, Qcnaty.
Export If yes, Q=dty
April 13, 2000
Mrs. Ann Lungu
City of Diamond Bar
21660 E. Copley Drive, Suite 190
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
RE: Development Review No. 2000-02 for Tract No. 52267
Dear Mrs. Lungu:
The purpose of this letter is to provide you. -written response to the.. issues that were raised in your
letter, dated April 3, 2000.
1. Address Labels/Radius Map
On April 13, 2000 a radius map was submitted illustrating the specific lots that were included in
the previous label submittal.
2. Main Entry Plan
As part of this letter, we are submitting 20 full size sets and 30 reductions of revised landscape
plans that delineate plant species, quantity, size and location. We have also included a note on the
plan identifying the type of entry paving proposed.
3. Fencing Plan
We are also forwarding 20 full size prints -and 30 reductions of the missing sheet LF 8.
4. Retaining Walls/Wall
As submitted the retaining for lot 91 is approximately 7 feet tall. As part of our precise grade
submittal, we will reduce the height of the retaining wall by building dual walls, similar to that
across the street. The fencing that surrounds the individual lots will be consistent (wrought iron
with pilasters) with the perimeter wall.
5. Front Setbacks:
Per your request we will, as part of our precise grade submittal, provide varying front setbacks on
the lots with large rear setbacks. Based on our review the following lots would accommodate
such a revision 13, 23, 25, 35, 38, 41, 43, 88, 103, 112 and 118.
6. Location of Model Types:
Based on our conversations, Pulte Homes agrees to provide elevation variation. In fact, the same
floor plan and elevation will not be plotted next story or across the street from the same floor plan
and elevation.
Southern California Division • 18401 Von Karman Avenue • Suite 200 • Irvine, CA 92612 • (949) 797-4400 • Fax (949) 797-4401
7
The purpose of this letter is to provide you. -written response to the.. issues that were raised in your
letter, dated April 3, 2000.
1. Address Labels/Radius Map
On April 13, 2000 a radius map was submitted illustrating the specific lots that were included in
the previous label submittal.
2. Main Entry Plan
As part of this letter, we are submitting 20 full size sets and 30 reductions of revised landscape
plans that delineate plant species, quantity, size and location. We have also included a note on the
plan identifying the type of entry paving proposed.
3. Fencing Plan
We are also forwarding 20 full size prints -and 30 reductions of the missing sheet LF 8.
4. Retaining Walls/Wall
As submitted the retaining for lot 91 is approximately 7 feet tall. As part of our precise grade
submittal, we will reduce the height of the retaining wall by building dual walls, similar to that
across the street. The fencing that surrounds the individual lots will be consistent (wrought iron
with pilasters) with the perimeter wall.
5. Front Setbacks:
Per your request we will, as part of our precise grade submittal, provide varying front setbacks on
the lots with large rear setbacks. Based on our review the following lots would accommodate
such a revision 13, 23, 25, 35, 38, 41, 43, 88, 103, 112 and 118.
6. Location of Model Types:
Based on our conversations, Pulte Homes agrees to provide elevation variation. In fact, the same
floor plan and elevation will not be plotted next story or across the street from the same floor plan
and elevation.
Southern California Division • 18401 Von Karman Avenue • Suite 200 • Irvine, CA 92612 • (949) 797-4400 • Fax (949) 797-4401
Page 2 April 13, 2000
7. Garage Dimensions:
We have verified that our required two car garages all meet the 20' x 20' requirement. In two
cases the third car garage does not meet the required 10' x 20' however, this garage space is -
optional and is more than that required by the code.
8. Setbacks/Lot Line Adjustments:
Asper your request, we will contact the City's Public Works/Engineering Division regarding lot
line adjustments for Lots 14, 65, 74, 107 and 110.
9. Height of the Homes:
We have added the building height information to the revised elevations.
10. Parking Relating to the Number of Bedrooms:
Per the City's direction, we have re -labeled some of the bedrooms to alternative uses, such as dens
lofts, game room, etc. We will also add a provision to our CC&Rs delineating a parking
hierarchy. The CC&Rs will require residents to first park in their garage, then they may park in
driveway and lastly they may park in the street.
11. Deposit Fee:
On April 13, 2000 a check was submitted in the amount of $1,500.00.
The public hearing notice sign was installed on the property on April 11, 2000 and the Hearing Notice
was posted on April 13, 2000. I have provided a digital picture of the sign to verify posting.
If you have any questions please feel free to contact me. Thank you for all your assistance.
Sincerely,
Pulte Home Corporation
Southern California Division
Scott Wright,
Forward Planner
do �'� °'•
dedicated public .,,
open space .
area to be
developed
(65 acres)
e
•
dedicated public
open space
a
r'
t
•
e
AND AVENUE
Agenda Item 8.1 - Development Review No. 2000-02 — 700 Block of DB Blvd.
Site plan, Floor plan, Elevations, Entry and Landscape plan, Fencing and Wall plan, and
materials/colors boards found in project file.
Project MEETINGS
April 25, 2000
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
COMMUNITY & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
PLANNING COMMISSION PROJECTS
Case #
PM
Location
PC
4/25
CC
5/2
PC
5/9
CC
5/16
PC
5/23
CC
6/6
PC
6/13
ALVAREZ DESIGN
CUP 2000-01
AJL
21008 LYCOMING
MV 2000-6
PH
PH
(Farmer Boys Food — Restaurant)
DIAMOND BAR HONDA/
VAR 2000-02
AJL
515 S. GRAND AVENUE
PROCESSING
ALEXANDER DEVELOPMENT
BALLY/TAYLOR ASSOCIATES.
MCUP 2000-03
Si
1178 S. DIAMOND BAR BL,
PH
GOULD, RICHARD
DR 2000-03
AJL
2819 WATER COURSE DRIVE
PH
(Single Family Residence)
PULTE HOME CORP
DR 2000-02
LKS/SJ/
TRACT 52267
PH
(127 Single Family Residence Development)
AJL
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS
Case #
PM
Location
DCM
BHOGAL, SURINDER
DCM
DCM
PROCESSING
DCM
ASHAI, TONY
ADR 2000-01
Si
2725 CLEAR CREEK
MV 2000-6
PH
- TP 2000-3
(Single Family Residence)
DIAMOND BAR HONDA/
VAR 2000-02
AJL
515 S. GRAND AVENUE
PROCESSING
ALEXANDER DEVELOPMENT
BALLY/TAYLOR ASSOCIATES.
MCUP 2000-03
Si
1178 S. DIAMOND BAR BL,
PH
(Food, beer and wine in existing restaurant site
GOULD, RICHARD
ADR 2000-06
LKS
2893 VISTA COURT — LOT 19
PH
(Single Family Residence)
GOULD, RICHARD
ADR 2000-08
LKS
2881 CRYSTAL RIDGE ROAD
PH
(Single Family Residence)
GOULD, RICHARD
ADR 2000-09
LKS
2859 CRYSTAL RIDGE ROAD
PH
(Single Family Residence)
PASCUAL, GENE - . ,,
ADR 2000-07
SJ t.,_
2001 DERRINGER LANE
; .j,
PH
(Single Family Residence) -
SKIDJEL, JOHN & NANCY
ADR 2000-03
Si
1044 ADEL AVENUE
PH
(Single Family Residence)
PENDING
Case #
PM
Location
BHOGAL, SURINDER
ADR 2000-10
23415 PLEASANT MEADOW
PROCESSING
(Single Family Residence)
MCUP 2000-6
MV 2000-6
- TP 2000-3
DIAMOND BAR HONDA/
VAR 2000-02
AJL
515 S. GRAND AVENUE
PROCESSING
ALEXANDER DEVELOPMENT
(Freeway Sign)
gA\project meeting\\doc PH = PUBLIC HEARING X = NOT A PUBLIC HEARING
PROJECT MEETINGS
Anri l 25. 2000
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
COMMI1NITY R DF.VF.I.0PMFNT RFRVTCFR I)F.PARTMFNT
PENDING
Case #
PM
Location
HIGHCREST DRIVE VACATION ;+
JDS/
HIGHCREST DRIVE
ON HOLD - PER APPLICANT
(General Plan Conformity) _
RM
HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE
JDS
CITYWIDE
PROCESSING
PATROSKE, WALT _
ADR 2000-05
LKS
22454 STEEPLECHASE LANE
PROCESSING
(Single Family Residence)
YEH; JERRY
MV 2000-05
AJL
2688 BLAZETRAIL
PROCESSING
(Single Family Residence)
DR 2000-05
ZONE CHANGE
ZC 2000-01
All,
DIAMOND BAR BLVD
PROCESSING
(Zone Change to Commercial)
PM 10208, PARCEL 2
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT
AJL
CITYWIDE
PROCESSING
g:\\project meeting\\doc
PH = PUBLIC HEARING X = NOT A PUBLIC HEARING
�,a •�� � XLJVV via A JLU AVJAUZS IRE PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA 1?TEM * SUBJECT:=v{> �,m+ • �> s _ ��_ (�- , t� . ``� %�• Z�`¢��_..�,..
TO: Planning Commission Secretary DATE:
'%-
FROM:
ADDRESS: 23 �o lr
ORGANIZATION.
SUBJECT:
I would like to address the Planning Commission on the above stated item. Please have the Commission Minutes
reflect my name and address as printed above.
Signature ,
NOTE: All persons may attend meetings and address the Planning Commission. This form is intended
to assist the Chairman in ensuring that all persons wishing to address the Commission will
have the opportunity and to ensure correct spelling of names in the Minutes.
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT: t
TO: Planning Commission Secretary DATE:
FROM:
ADDRESS:
ORGANIZATION:
SUBJECT:
I would like to address the Planning Commission on the above stated item. Please have the Commission Minutes
reflect my name and address as' printed above.
Signature .
NOTE: All persons may attend meetings and address the Planning Commission. This form is intended
to assist the Chairman in ensuring that all persons wishing to address the Commission will
have the opportunity and to ensure correct spelling of names in the Minutes.
VOLUNTARY REQUEST 11'ESS TBE PLANNING E
MSION
AGENDA ITEM * SUBJECT:
TO: Planning Commission Secretary
FROM: l t, �t eA
ADDRESS: t1
ORGANIZATION:
DATE: 4.— Z �;--- -
SUBJECT:
I would like to address the Planning Commission on the above stated item. Please have the Commission Minutes
reflect my name and address as'printed above.
Signature
NOTE: All persons may attend meetings and address the Planning Commission. This form is intended
to assist the Chairman in ensuring that all persons wishing to address the Commission will
have the opportunity and to ensure correct spelling of names in the Minutes.
Filer
,gvl!ew b
d y
ca 7,76
�4, and niiing- eaoy for
Filer iewdo by . .....
on
destruction bn(I is �reaacdly f
y Coo r-
ity Clerk f