HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/26/2002PLANNING FILE Copy
COMMISSIOiv
AGENDA
March 26, 2002
7:00 RM
South Coast Air Quality Management District
Auditorium
21865 East Copley Drive
Diamond Bar, CA
Chairman Joe Ruzicka
Vice Chairman Steve Tye
Commissioner Steven Nelson
Commissioner Dan Nolan
Commissioner Jack Tanaka
Copies of staff reports or other written documentation relating to agenda items are on file in the Planning
Division of the Dept. of Community & Development Services, located at 21825 E. Copley Drive, and are
available for public inspection. If you have questions regarding an agenda item, please call (909) 396-5676
during regular business hours.
in an effort to comply with the requirements of Title 11 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the City of
Diamond Bar requires that any person in need of any type of special equipment, assistance or
accommodation(s) in order to communicate at a City public meeting must inform the Dept. of Community &
Development Services at (909) 396-5676 a minimum of 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting.
Please refrain from smoking, eating or
drinking in the Auditorium
The City of Diamond Bar uses recycled paper
and encourages you to do the same
City of Diamond Bar
Planning Commission
MEETING RULES
PUBLIC INPUT
The meetings of the Diamond Bar Planning Commission are open to the public. A member of the public may
address the Commission on the subject of one or more agenda items and/or other items of which are within the
subject matter jurisdiction of the Diamond Bar Planning Commission. A request to address the Commission
should be submitted in writing at the public hearing, to the Secretary of the Commission.
As a general rule, the opportunity for public comments will take place at the discretion of the Chair. However,
in order to facilitate the meeting, persons who are interested parties for an item may be requested to give their
presentation at the time the item is called on the calendar. The Chair may limit individual public input to five
minutes on any item; or the Chair may limit the total amount of time allocated for public testimony based on the
number of people requesting to speak and the business of the Commission.
Individuals are requested to conduct themselves in a professional and businesslike manner. Continents and
questions are welcome so that all points of view are considered prior to the Commission making
recommendations to the staff and City Council.
In accordance with State Law (Brown Act), all matters to be acted on by the Commission must be posted at least
72 hours prior to the Commission meeting. In case of emergency or when a subject matter arises subsequent to
the posting of the agenda, upon making certain findings, the Commission may act on item that is not on the
posted agenda.
INFORMATION RELATING TO AGENDAS AND ACTIONS OF THE COMMISSION
Agendas for Diamond Bar Planning Commission meetings are prepared by the Planning Division of the
Community and Development Services Department. Agendas are available 72 hours prior to the meeting at City
Hall and the public library, and may be accessed by personal computer at the number below.
Every meeting of the Planning Commission is recorded on cassette tapes and duplicate tapes are available for a
nominal charge.
ADA REQUIREMENTS
A cordless microphone is available for those persons with mobility impairments who cannot access the public
speaking area. The service of the cordless microphone and sign language interpreter services are available by
giving notice at least three business days in advance of the meeting. Please telephone (909) 396-5676 between
7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m., Monday through Thursday, and 7:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Friday.
HELPFUL PHONE NUMBERS
Copies of Agenda, Rules of the Commission, Cassette Tapes of Meetings (909) 396-5676
Computer Access to Agendas (909) 860 -LINE
General Agendas (909) 396-5676
email: info@ci.diamond-bar.ca.us
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, March 26, 2002
CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
4
3.
4.
4
6.
Next Resolution No. 2002-05
AGENDA
ROLL CALL: COMMISSIONERS: Chairman Joe Ruzicka, Vice -Chairman
Steve Tye, Steve Nelson, Dan Nolan, and Jack Tanaka.
MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS:
This is the time and place for the general public to address the members of the
Planning Commission on any item that is within their jurisdiction, allowing the public an
opportunity to speak on non-public hearing and non -agenda items. Please complete a
Speaker's Card for the recording Secretary (ComDletion of this form is voluntarv.)
There is a five-minute maximum time limit when addressing the Planning Commission.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Chairman.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
The following items listed on the consent calendar are considered routine and are
approved by a single motion. Consent calendar items may be removed from the
agenda by request of the Commission only:
4.1. Minutes of Regular Meeting: March 12, 2002.
OLD BUSINESS: None.
NEW BUSINESS:
6.1. Comprehensive Sign Program No. 2002-01 Four wall signs, four canopy
signs, one monument sign, and replace face of existing pole sign for an existing
Shell Service Station
7. PUBLIC HEARING:
7.1. Development Review No. 2001-23, Minor Conditional Use Permit
No. 2001-13 (pursuant to Code Sections 22.48.020(A)(1), 22.56, and 22.68) is
a request to remodel and add approximately 2,209 square feet to an existing
legal nonconforming, two-story, single-family residence of 3,025 square feet
including decks, porch, patio and three car garage. A Minor Conditional Use
Permit is required to process a legal nonconforming structure.
MARCH 26, 2002
Project Address:
Property Owner:
Applicant:
Page 2 PLANNING COMMISSION
22245 Steeplechase Lane
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
Donald Hermann
22245 Steeplechase Lane
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
S & W Development
20272 Carrey Road
Walnut, CA 91789
Environmental Determination: Pursuant to the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section 15301(e)(2)(A), the City has determined
that this project is Categorically Exempt.
Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve
Development Review No. 2001-23, Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2001-13,
Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval as listed within the draft resolution.
8. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS:
9. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
9.1 Public Hearing dates for future projects.
10. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS:
PARKS AND RECREATION
COMMISSION MEETING:
19th ANNUAL EASTER EGG
HUNT:
CITY COUNCIL MEETING:
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW:
Thursday, March 28, 2002 — 7:00 p.m.
AQMD/Govt. Center Hearing Board Room
21865 E. Copley Drive
Saturday, March 30, 2002 - 10 a.m.
Co-sponsored by the Diamond Bar Breakfast
Lions Club and the City
Summitridge Park, 1425 Summitridge Dr.
Tuesday, April 2, 2002 — 6:30 p.m.
AQMD/Govt. Center Auditorium
21865 E. Copley Drive
Tuesday, April 9, 2002 — 6:00 p.m.
AQMD/Govt. Center Auditorium
21865 E. Copley Drive
MARCH 26, 2002
PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING:
TRAFFIC AND
TRANSPORTATION
COMMISSION MEETING:
11. ADJOURNMENT:
Page 3 PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, April 9, 2002 — 7:00 p.m.
AQMD/Govt. Center Auditorium
21865 E. Copley Drive
Thursday, April 11, 2002 — 7:00 p.m.
AQMD/Govt. Center Hearing Board Room
21865 E. Copley Drive
MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
MARCH 12, 2002
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairman Nelson called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. in the South Coast Air Quality
Management/Government Center Auditorium, 21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar,
California.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Commissioner Tye led the pledge of allegiance.
1. ADMINISTRATION OF OATHS OF OFFICE FOR PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Administered by Lynda Burgess, City Clerk.
2. ROLL CALL:
Present: Chairman Nelson, Vice Chairman Joe Ruzicka and
Commissioners Dan Nolan, Jack Tanaka and Steve Tye.
Also Present: James DeStefano, Deputy City Manager, Ann Lungu,
Associate Planner, Linda Smith, Development Services
Assistant, and Stella Marquez, Administrative Secretary, Lt.
Mike Walker, Walnut/Diamond Bar Sheriff Department.
3. REORGANIZATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION:
DCM/DeStefano opened the nominations for Chairman of the Planning Commission
Commissioner Tye nominated Commissioner Ruzicka to serve as Chairman of the
Planning Commission. Commissioner Nelson seconded the nomination. There
being no other nominations, DCM/DeStefano closed the nominations. Upon Roll
Call vote, Commissioner Ruzicka was unanimously elected to serve as Chairman of
the Planning Commission.
Chair/Ruzicka assumed the gavel and opened nominations for Vice Chairman of the
Planning Commission.
Commissioner Nelson nominated Commissioner Tye to serve as Vice Chairman of
the Planning Commission. Commissioner Nolan seconded the nomination. There
being no other nominations, Chair/Ruzicka closed the nominations. Upon Roll Call
vote, Commissioner Tye was unanimously elected to serve as Vice Chairman of the
Planning Commission.
MARCH 12, 2002
4.
5.
6.
7
8.
PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION
Chair/Ruzicka thanked Commissioner Nelson for the way in which he conducted
meetings — calmly, expertly and inclusively, and presented him a plaque
commemorating his service to the Planning Commission.
MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS:
APPROVAL OF AGENDA: As Presented.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
6.1 Minutes of the Regular Meeting of February 26, 2002.
C/Tye moved, Chair/Nelson seconded, to approve the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of February 26, 2002, as presented. Without objections,
the motion was so ordered, with Commissioners Nolan and Tanaka
abstaining.
OLD BUSINESS: None.
NEW BUSINESS: None.
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
9.1 Development Review No. 2001-18, Minor Variance No. 2002-01, Tree
Permit No. 2002-02 and Neaative Declaration of Environmental Impact
(pursuant to Code Sections 22.48, 22.52 and 22.38). The applicant has requested
approval of plans to construct a three (3) story single-family residence of
approximately 7,740 square feet with two attached two -car garages totaling 977
square feet on an approximately 57,934.8 (1.33 acres) square foot R-1 (40,000)
zoned lot. Additionally, the applicant requests approval of a Minor Variance to
deviate from the minimum required front yard setback distance, and a Tree Permit
for the removal and replacement of a protected tree species.
PROJECT ADDRESS:
PROPERTY OWNER:
22509 Ridgeline Road
(APN 8713-006-019)
Diamond bar, CA 91765
Jay Arora
1149 Grubstake Drive
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
MARCH 12, 2002
PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION
APPLICANT: S & W Development
20272 Carney Road
Walnut, CA 91789
DCM/DeStefano reported that the applicant requested that this matter be continued
to April 9, 2002, in order to give the property and owner an opportunity to meet and
further discuss some of the issues raised by The Country Estates Homeowners
Association and adjacent property owner.
Chair/Ruzicka opened the public hearing.
There was no one who wished to speak on this matter.
C/Nelson moved, C/Nolan seconded, to continue Development Review No. 2001-
18, Minor Variance No. 2002-02, Tree Permit No. 2002-02 and Negative Declaration
of Environmental Impact, to April 9, 2002. Motion carried by the following Roll Call
vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Nelson, Nolan, Tanaka, VC/Tye,
Chair/Ruzicka
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None
9.2 Development Code Amendment No. 2002-01 (pursuant to Code Section
22.44). This is a request to amend the following Articles of the Development Code:
Article II
Section 22.10.030, Table 2 -5 -allowed uses and permit requirements for Office
Zoning Districts: Amendment relates to adding computer services/network gaming
centers as a specified use with a Conditional Use Permit approval.
Section 22.10.030, Table 2 -6 -allowed uses and permit requirements for
Commercial/Industrial Zoning Districts: Amendment relates to adding computer
services/network gaming centers as a specified use with a Conditional Use Permit
approval.
Article III
Section 22.42.035, Computer Services/Network Gaming Center: Amendment
relates to adding standards applying to this specified use.
MARCH 12, 2002
Article IV
PAGE 4 PLANNING COMMISSION
Section 22.80.020, Definitions of Specialized Terms and Phrases, Definitions,
"C": Amendment relates to adding a definition of a computer services/network
gaming center.
PROJECT ADDRESS:
APPLICANT:
Citywide
City of Diamond Bar
21825 E. Copley Drive
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
AssocP/Lungu presented staff's report and pointed out the proposed changes.
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt a resolution recommending
City Council approval of Development Code Amendment No. 2002-01.
C/Nelson asked why staff chose to go with one parking space per 35 square feet as
opposed to one parking space per computer workstation.
AssocP/Lungu responded that her research concluded that one parking space per
35 square feet was most prevalent.
DCM/DeStefano pointed out that the square footage computation is consistent with
other types of land use in the city.
C/Nelson was surprised at the amount of business that takes place between 10:00
p.m. and 2:00 a.m. He asked Lt. Walker if there are significant benefits to cutting
back the hours of operation.
Lt. Walker explained that the Sheriff Department has limited experience with this
type of business. Problems with similar businesses in adjacent jurisdictions were
generated as a result of complaints from adjacent business owners and their
customers. The results were loitering, increased trash and debris, possible drinking,
smoking, etc. that annoyed other business or their customers. Staying open later at
night does not appear to be an issue. The primary concern is for juveniles (under
age 18) in relationship to the 10:00 p.m. curfew and the businesses monitoring their
customer base. Most of these types of businesses have unrestricted access to
Internet sites and the Sheriff's Department is concerned with juveniles viewing
pornography. The Department has not encountered anything troublesome after
midnight other than previously mentioned issues.
C/Nelson said that the city is concerned about taking officers away from their normal
patrol duties to respond to disturbances.
MARCH[ 12, 2002 PAGE 5 PLANNING COMMISSION
L1. Walker said that most shift changes take place at 10:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m.
From midnight on, the Sheriff Department has a full compliment of early -morning
officers on duty.
VC/Tye reiterated his question about how much business is generated between
midnight and 2:00 a.m.
Chair/Ruzicka said that on February 26 one of the business owners made the
assertion that requiring a security guard is too expensive and that security cameras
serve as a deterrent.
Lt. Walker said that in his experience, there are some areas that absolutely require
a security guard. Businesses that generate customer demands that exceed the
actual business capacity require some type of security enforcement.
Chair/Ruzicka felt that the Planning Commission needed to address these issues
up -front because of the bad reputation perpetrated on these businesses by a few
individuals.
DCM/DeStefano responded that the resolution captures the existing businesses by
stating that they must comply with this ordinance within six months of its adoption
date.
VC/Tye asked Lt. Walker what the Sheriff Department would do if a minor used a
computer after 10:00 p.m. while still using the system within their block of time?
Lt. Walker said that minors could be out after 10:00 p.m. under certain conditions.
He doubts that any law enforcement officer would find a note from the parent
sufficient cause to be out after 10:00 p.m. If a supervising parent or adult is present
and assumes responsibility for the minor, there is no violation of the curfew law. In
his opinion, it would be incumbent upon the business owner not to sell blocks of
time to underage individuals that extend past the curfew hour. If a minor remains
after 10:00 p.m. an officer would be obliged to escort him from the business and call
the parents to retrieve him.
C/Nolan said he observed Lamers -X to be very busy. He believes it is naive to
believe this type of business will not generate extra patrol requirements. Is staff's
proposal for hours of operation consistent with adjacent communities?
AssocP/Lungu replied that the hours of operation vary from city to city. Staff's
proposal is consistent with the majority of communities. -
MARCH 12, 2002 PAGE 6 PLANNING COMMISSION
Chair/Ruzicka opened the public hearing.
Paul Esteves, Owner, Gamers-X, stated that the reason for the percentage of
business between 8:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. is because those are the hours during
which blocks of time are sold which makes it difficult to determine the percentage of
business that occurs between midnight and 2:00 a.m. The number of people who
remain after midnight varies. Gamers-X provided a lounge/waiting area at the
current location. If the Commission determines a definite need for security
personnel, he believes it should be during the evening hours when there is greater
potential for problems. The requirement for business owners to monitor curfew
hours is legitimate. Under certain circumstances, under aged youth stay at the
facility past 10:00 p.m. waiting for their parents to leave work and pick them up. He
asked that under such circumstances the young person be allowed to remain under
supervision until they are picked up.
VC/Tye thought 12:00 midnight should be the hour of closing. One item that is no
longer contained in the proposed amendment is the requirement that these types of
businesses not be allowed within a certain distance of a school.
DCM/DeStefano stated that staff determined that while other types of entertainment
are permitted adjacent to schools, other than alcohol and adult uses, this type of
business would not logically be restricted. However, the Commission may make
any requirement it deems appropriate for this land use.
Chair/Ruzicka believed the hours of operation could be changed at a future date.
He prefers allowing entrepreneurs every opportunity for success in the community.
However, language should be included that would allow for the revocation
amendment of a permit in the event that the business did not comply.
Chair/Ruzicka closed the public hearing.
C/Nolan suggested the following language for item a. on page 7 to wit: "Shall
provide at least one (1) full-time adult attend or supervisor, 21 years of age or older
for each 20 machines." And add language for weekend hours.
C/Nelson said he heard nothing from Lt. Walker that indicated the alleviation of
problems by closing the business at 12:00 midnight instead of 2:00 a.m. Is there
any difference in the need for requiring security during weekdays or weekends.
Lt. Walker said that the Sheriff Department has not encountered problems with
businesses that stay open later than midnight other than businesses that serve
alcoholic beverages or engage in live entertainment. Lt. Walker said that during the
school day there would be very little requirement for security. In his opinion, it would
MARCH 12, 2002
10.
PAGE 7 PLANNING COMMISSION
be more prudent to require security from 6:00 p.m. until closing for all days of
operation.
C/Nelson moved, C/Nolan seconded, to recommend approval of Development Code
Amendment No. 2002-01 with the following change to item a. on Page 7 - "shall
provide at least one (1) full time attendant or supervisor, 21 years of age or older for
each 20 machines. In addition, one (1) security guard for each 20 machines shall
be provided between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and closing for all days of operation.
Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Nelson, Nolan, Tanaka, VC/Tye,
Chair/Ruzicka
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None
Chair/Ruzicka thanked Lt. 'Walker for his participation
PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS: VC/Tye asked what the City is doing
relative to requiring businesses complying with the City's sign ordinance.
DCM/DeStefano responded that special promotion signs are considered to be
advertising and need to be reviewed. He is not aware of an active case with respect
to Carl's Jr. signs along the drive-through. However, he will direct staff to review the
matter.
VC/Tye welcomed Commissioner Jack Tanaka.
C/Tanaka said he is honored and excited to join the Planning Commission. He
looks forward to working with his fellow commissioners, staff and residents.
Chair/Ruzicka welcomed Commissioners Tanaka and Nolan, two of the finest
citizens in Diamond Bar. He thanked the Commission for their trust in selecting him
as Chairman of the Planning Commission.
11. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
DCM/DeStefano stated that Commissioners should provide requested information
for the city's telephone book: directly to AS/Marquez. CC/Burgess has ordered two
advisory guides that deal with conflict of interest laws for local government officials
as well as, the latest version of the Ralph M. Brown Act with respect to open and
public meetings. Two projects of note — The Country Estates project previously
mentioned and the vacant lot adjacent to the Holiday Inn Select in the Gateway
Corporate commonly referred to as "the Dr. Omar parcel." Staff just received a
MARCH 12, 2002 PAGE 8 PLANNING COMMISSION
proposal to construct a two-story 25,000 square foot office building that will likely be
considered by the Planning Commission in about two months. He and Chairman
Ruzicka will attend the Planners Seminar in Monterey late next week.
12. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS:
As scheduled.
ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business to come before the Planning Commission, Chairman
Ruzicka adjourned the meeting at 8:14 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
James DeStefano
Deputy City Manager
Attest:
Chairman Joe Ruzicka
City of Diamond Bar
PLANNING COMMISSION
Staff Report
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 6.1
REPORT DATE: March 11, 2002
MEETING DATE: March 26, 2002
CASE/FILE NUMBER: Comprehensive Sign Program
No. 2002-01
APPLICATION REQUEST: To install four wall signs, four canopy
signs and one monument sign and
replace the face of an existing pole
sign.
PROJECT LOCATION: 3241 S. Brea Canyon Road
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
PROPERTY OWNERS: Equilon Enterprises, LLC
2255 N. Ontario
Burbank, CA 91504
APPLICANT: Deni Sutikna
A & S Engineering
207 W. Alameda Ave. #203
Burbank, CA 91502
BACKGROUND:
The property owner, Equilon Enterprises, LLC and applicant, A & S Engineering, are
requesting approval of Comprehensive Sign Program No. 2002-01 (pursuant to Code
Section 22.36.060). The request is to install four wall signs, four canopy signs and one
monument and replace the face of an existing pole sign for an existing Shell service
station with an automated drive-through car wash tunnel and food mart.
The project site, approximately 27,003 square feet, is located at 3241 S. Brea Canyon
Road (corner of Brea Canyon Road/Diamond Bar Boulevard). It has a General Plan
land use designation of Professional Office (OP) and a zoning designation of
1
Commercial Planned Development (CPD). Generally, the following zones and use
surround the project site: To the north is the CPD and Single Family Residence -
Minimum Lot Size 7,500 Square Feet (R-1-7,500) Zone; to the south is the CPD and R-
1-7, 500 Zones; to the east is the Neighborhood Commercial (C-1) and R-1-7,500
Zones; and to the west is the Orange (57) Freeway.
ANALYSIS:
The purpose and intent of the Comprehensive Sign Program is to integrate a project's
signs with the design of the project's buildings to achieve a unified architectural
statement. Additionally, the purpose and intent of the Program includes harmony with
existing signs and encourages creativity while providing a means for the flexible
application of sign regulations.
Pursuant to Development Code Section 22.36.06, a Comprehensive Sign Program is
required if the proposed signs meet one of five criterions. In this case, the proposed
Comprehensive Sign Program meets the criterion relating to whenever four or more
signs are proposed for a new or existing development. The Planning Commission is
the review authority.
The applicant is requesting to install four wall signs, four canopy signs and one
monument sign and replace the face of an existing pole sign. The proposed signs are
as follows:
Wall Signs
TEXT
SIGN FACE
DESCRIPTION
LOCATION
AREA
"Food Mart"
3.69 sq. ft.
Decal/ non -illuminated
South side of building adjacent to
red letters
main entrance
"Car Wash"
3.50 sq. ft.
Decal/ non -illuminated
South side of building
red letters
"Enter"
1.83 sq. ft.
Decal/ non -illuminated
West side of building at entrance of
red letters directional
car wash tunnel
"Exit"
1.33 sq. ft.
Decal/ non -illuminated
East side of building at exit of car
red letters directional
wash tunnel
Total sign face area of the wall signs is 20 square feet. However, 3.16 square feet of the
total sign face area is devoted to vehicle oriented safety and directions and is for the
purpose of guiding traffic and does not bear advertising materials. Therefore pursuant to
Code, a directional sign in a commercial zone does not count toward the total sign face
area and shall not exceed six square feet.
2
Canopy Signs
TEXT
SIGN FACE
AREA
DESCRIPTION
LOCATION
"Shell"
Four at
Red individual letters-
On canopies above the gasoline
Shell logo and
14.45 sq. ft.
illuminated
pumps
gasoline pricing,
each, total -57.8
sign face,
Bar Blvd./ Brea Canyon Road, 10 ft.
sq. ft.
from the ultimate right-of-way
"Formula Shell"
Six at 7.33 sq. ft.
Decay non -illuminated
Topper for the gasoline pumps
each, total -44
red letters
sq. ft.
Total sign face area of the canopy signs is 101 square feet.
Monument Sian
TEXT
SIGN FACE
DESCRIPTION
LOCATION
Shell logo
AREAMEIGHT
illuminated,
Existing location -northwest
Shell logo and
Six feet high and
illuminated
Located on the corner of Diamond
gasoline pricing,
32 sq. ft. of sign
sign face,
Bar Blvd./ Brea Canyon Road, 10 ft.
face area
from the ultimate right-of-way
The Shell logo will utilize the corporate colors of red and yellow on a white background.
The monument sign's pricing section will utilize a gray background with black numbers
and letters. The sign's base will be constructed of sheet metal and tex-coated in light
gray.
Existing Pole Sign
TEXT
EXISTING SIGN
FACE
AREA/HEIGHT
DESCRIPTION
LOCATION
Shell logo
existing
illuminated,
Existing location -northwest
height of 60
replace existing
portion of the project site to
ft. to remain/
sign face,
remain
existing sign
face area of
36 sq. ft. to
remain
The existing pole sign will remain the same. The only change that will be made is the
sign face. However, the sign face area will remain the same.
3
Existing wall signs, price signs and monument sign will be removed and replaced by the
proposed signs referenced above. Pursuant to the City's Development Code, the
maximum sign face area for the existing development is 125 square feet. This sign
face area excludes monument signs, pole signs and pricing signs. The proposed
Comprehensive Sign Program delineates a total sign face area of 117.84 square feet,
thereby complying with the Code. The Code allows a monument sign with a maximum
six foot height and maximum sign face area of 32 square feet for this particular
development. The proposed monument sign complies with the City's development
standards for a monument sign. The existing pole sign is considered legal
nonconforming. As such, it is required to remain the same. Changing the location,
height or increasing or decreasing the sign face area will cause the loss of its legal
nonconforming status. However, changing the sign face is permitted as long as the
sign face area remains the same. This is the case for the proposed Comprehensive
Sign Program.
Proposed colors of all signs reflect Shell's corporate colors. The style of the proposed
signs is typical for this type of development. In addition, the proposed signs are
compatible with the existing surrounding commercial developments' eclectic signs.
The applicant also proposes to change the building colors to conform to Shell Oil's new
image program. Currently, the building is off-white with tan split face block veneer on
the lower portion of the building and a terra-cotta the roof. The tan split face block
veneer is also utilized on the supports of the existing canopy. The applicant intends to
paint the building including the block veneer portion white. The band the "Food Mart"
sign will be mounted on will be painted red (25 %) and yellow (75%). The band the
"Car Wash", "Entrance" and "Exit" signs will be mounted on will be painted blue (25%)
and yellow (75%). The columns that support the canopies will be painted white. On the
canopies a white band will be installed. The band will be eliminated and will display
"Shell" in red letters. The band will also have a non -illuminated red stripe at the bottom.
The proposed Comprehensive Sign Program will not change the existing uses on-site,
intensified the uses or add additional square footage to the existing building or
canopies. The proposed signs and color changes will cause the project site to conform
to Shell Oil's new image program.
The Building and Safety Division and the Public Works Division have reviewed this
project. The Divisions' recommendations are incorporated within the draft resolution.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT:
Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City
has determined that Comprehensive Sign Program No. 2002-01 is categorically exempt
pursuant to CEQA Section 15311 (a).
4
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING:
Pubic hearing notice is not required for a Comprehensive Sign Program.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Comprehensive Sign
Program No. 2002-01, Findings of .Fact and conditions of approval as listed within the
attached draft resolution.
REQUIRED COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PROGRAM FINDINGS:
1. The Comprehensive Sign Program satisfies the purpose and intent of Code
Section 22.36.060;
2. The signs enhance the overall development, are in harmony with, and are
visually related to other signs included in the Comprehensive Sign Program and
to the structure and/or uses they identify, and to surrounding development;
3. The Comprehensive Sign Program accommodates future revisions which may
be required due to changes in uses or tenants; and
4. The Comprehensive Sign Program complies with the standards of this Chapter,
except that flexibility is allowed with regard to sign area, number, location, and/or
height to the extent that the Comprehensive Sign Program will enhance the
overall development and will more fully accomplish the purposes of Code
Section 22.36.060.
Prepared by:
�/n J. Lu gu, Associate Planner
Attachments:
1. Draft resolution;
2. Exhibit "A" - site plan, elevations and written sign criteria dated March 26, 2002;
and
3. Application.
5
A.
B.
PLANNING COMMISSION O
RESOLUTION NO. 2002 -XX
*1401
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING
COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PROGRAM NO. 2002-01
AND CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION SECTION 15311
(a), A REQUEST TO INSTALL FOUR WALL SIGNS,
FOUR CANOPY SIGNS AND ONE MONUMENT SIGN
AND REPLACE THE SIGN FACE OF AND EXISTING
POLE SIGN. THE PROJECT SITE IS LOCATED AT
3241 S. BREA CANYON ROAD, DIAMOND BAR,
CALIFORNIA.
RECITALS.
The property owner, Equilon Enterprises, LLC and applicant, A & S
Engineering have filed an application for Comprehensive Sign Program
No. 2002-01, for the installation of four wall signs, four canopy signs and
one monument sign and replace the sign face of an existing pole sign.
The project site is located at 3241 S. Brea Canyon Road, Diamond Bar,
Los Angeles County, California, as described above in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Comprehensive
Sign Program and categorical exemption shall be referred to as the
"Application".
2. The Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar on March 26,
2002 conducted a meeting on the Application.
3. Pursuant to Chapter 22.36 of the Diamond Bar Development Code, a
Comprehensive Sign Program does not require a public hearing or
notification of property owners surrounding the project site.
Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City cf Diamond Bar as follows:
1. This Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
1
2. The Planning Commission hereby determines that the project identified
above in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the requirements
of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, as
amended, and the guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant
Section 15311 (a) of Article 19 of Chapter 3 of Title 14 the California
Code of Regulations.
3. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds and determines
that, having considered the record as a whole including the findings set
forth below, and changes and alterations which have been
incorporated into and conditioned upon the proposed project set forth
in the application, there is no evidence before this Planning
Commission that the project proposed herein will have the potential of
an adverse effect on wild life resources or the habitat upon which the
wildlife depends. Based upon substantial evidence, this Planning
Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effects
contained in Section 753.5 (d) of Title 14 of the Califomia Code of
Regulations.
4. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein, this Planning
Commission hereby finds as follows:
(a) The project relates to a 27,003 square footage parcel currently
developed with a Shell service station with an automated drive-
through car wash tumble and food mart.
(b) The project site has a General Plan Land Use designation of
Professional Office (OP). It is has a zoning designation of
Commercial Planned Development (CPD).
(c) Generally, the following zones and use surround the project site:
To the north is the CPD and Single Family Residence -Minimum
Lot Size 7,500 Square Feet (R-1-7,500) Zone; to the south is the
CPD and R-1-7,500 Zones; to the east is the Neighborhood
Commercial (C-1) and R-1-7,500 Zones; and to the west is the
Orange (57) Freeway.
(d) The Application is a request to install the following proposed signs:
(1) Wall Signs: "Food Marr'— 3.69 square feet;
"Car Wash" — 3.50 square feet;
"Enter' —1.83 square feet;
"Exit" —1.33 square feet;
(2) Canopy Signs: Install canopy fascia for the proposed
canopy signs;
2
"Shell" —14.45 square feet each and four
proposed; and
"Formula Shell" — 7.33 square feet each
and four proposed;
(3) Monument Sign: 6 feet tall and 32 square feet of sign face
area; and
(4) Existing Pole Sign: replace existing sign face area with
Shell corporate logo; existing height of
60 ft. and existing sign face area of 36
square feet to remain the same.
(e) The proposed signs are in substantial compliance with the adopted
General Plan.
The General Plan requires that a sign concept address the
following: scale in relationship to the building; landscaping; and
readability. It also dictates that the concept ensure integration into
the overall site and architectural theme of the site's development.
The proposed signs' scale and placement allows for easy
readability and a clear line -of -site for traffic traveling along Brea
Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard, the Orange (57)
Freeway and entering and exiting the site. The clear line -of -site
was reviewed and confirmed by the Public Works Division. The
signs' design is compatible with the existing eclectic signs of the
surrounding commercial areas.
(f) The Comprehensive Sign Program satisfies the purpose of Chapter
22.36 of the City of Diamond Bar Development Code and the intent
of Section 22.36.060;
The proposed Comprehensive Sign Program No. 2002-01 is
consistent with the purpose and intent of Chapter 22.36 of the City
of Diamond Bar Development Code because the signs' design and
colors reflect the architecture and color of the project site's
development and reflects the corporate colors of Shell Oil.
Additionally, the proposed signs' design is compatible with the
existing eclectic signs of the surrounding commercial areas.
(g) The proposed signs enhance the overall development, are in
harmony with, and are visually related to other signs included in the
Comprehensive Sign Program and to the structure and/or uses
they identify, and to surrounding development;
The proposed signs' placement allows for clear identification of the
Shell service station when traveling on the Brea Canyon Road,
Diamond Bar Boulevard and Orange Freeway. Additionally, the
proposed signs' colors and design are consistent with the on-site
service station structure in that the signs are integrated with the
said structure to achieve a unified architectural statement while
allowing for easy readability. Furthermore, the proposed signs'
design is harmonious with the eclectic collection of sign styles in
commercial centers in the City as a whole, as well as being
compatible with the style, color and signs of the commercial sites
surrounding the project site.
(h) The Comprehensive Sign Program accommodates future revisions,
which may be required due to changes in uses or tenants.
The application utilizes the maximum signage with this submittal.
Pursuant to Code, the Director may approve future revisions if it is
determined that the revisions are minor and that the intent of the
original approval, and any conditions attached are not affected.
(i) The Comprehensive Sign Program complies with the standards of
Chapter 22.36 of the City of Diamond Bar Development Code,
except that flexibility is allowed with regard to sign area, number,
location, and/or height to the extent that the Comprehensive Sign
Program will enhance the overall development and will more fully
accomplish the purpose of this Chapter.
The proposed signs, their height, sign face area and locations
are consistent with the intent of Chapter 22.36 of the City of
Diamond Bar Development Code. The color, size, presentation,
and placement of the signs allow for flexibility with compatibility
and logo recognition. Additionally and pursuant to Code Section
22.36.130B., a single tenant is allowed a total of 125 square feet
of sign face area for wall signs. The total proposed sign face
areas is 117.84 square feet and does not exceed the maximum
sign face area permitted. Furthermore, the Development Code
allows a service station to have a monument sign with 32 square
feet sign face area and a maximum height of six feet. The
proposed monument sign is consistent with this standard. The
existing pole sign is considered legal nonconforming. The
proposed Comprehensive Sign Program does not intend to alter
the sign face area, height or location of the existing pole sign.
However, it intends to replace the sign face with a new sign face
without increasing the sign face area. The proposed
Comprehensive Sign Program will cause the removal of to the
freestanding monument signs utilized for pricing. The removal
4
of the signs will cause the site to have a less cluttered and more
organized looked, thereby enhancing the overall development.
5. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth above, the Planning
Commission hereby approves the Application subject to the following
conditions:
(a) The project shall substantially conform to site plan, elevations,
color, design and written sign criteria collectively labeled as Exhibit
"A" dated March 26, 2002, as submitted and approved by the
Planning Commission, as amended herein.
(b) The site shall be maintained in a condition which is free of debris
both during and after the construction, addition, or implementation
of the entitlement granted herein. The removal of all trash, debris,
and refuse, whether during or subsequent to construction shall be
done only by the property owner, applicant or by a duly permitted
waste contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide
collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste from
residential„ commercial, construction, and industrial areas within
the City. It shall be the applicant's obligation to insure that the
waste contractor utilized has obtained permits from the City of
Diamond Bar to provide such services.
(c) Arabic address numerals shall be added to the monument sign's
base. The numerals shall not exceed a four square feet area and
shall be a minimum of three feet high.
(d) A landscape area equal to twice the area of one face (64 square
feet) of the monument sign shall be provided. The applicant shall
submit a landscape/irrigation plan for this area for the City's review
and approval. The landscape/irrigation plan shall be submitted to
the City before the issuance of any City permits.
Landscaping/irrigation shall be installed prior to final inspection.
(e) Monument sign shall maintain a distance of 10 feet from the
ultimate right-of-way of Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar
Boulevard. Before plan check submittal, the applicant shall submit
a revised site plan delineating said setback for the City's review
and approval
(f) Total sign face area for all proposed wall signs and canopy signs
shall not exceed what 117.84 square feet.
5
(g) Monument sign and wall signs' attachment shall be engineered and
designed for a maximum soil pressure of 100 pounds and wind
load of 80 miles an hour with an exposure of "C".
(h) Electrical conduit shall not be exposed.,
(i) Plans shall conform to State and local building codes (i.e. 1997
edition of the Uniform Building Code and the 1997 edition of the
National Electrical Code) as well as the State Energy Code.
Q) Construction plans shall delineate the location of the disconnect
switch, method of the electric sign attachment to sign base and
verification of U.L. approval.
(k) The applicant shall comply with Planning and Zoning, Building and
Safety and Public Works Divisions' requirements and Fire
Department requirements.
(1) This grant is valid for one year and construction shall commence
(i.e. footings) within this one-year period or the grant shall expire.
(m) This grant shall not be effective for any purpose until the permittee
and owner of the property involved (if other than the permittee)
have filed, within fifteen (15) days of approval of this grant, at the
City of Diamond Bar Community and Development Services
Department/Planning Division, their affidavit stating that they are
aware of and agree to accept all the conditions of this grant.
Further, this grant shall not be effective until the permittee pays
any remaining City processing fees.
(n) If the Department of Fish and Game determines that Fish and
Game Code Section 711.4 applies to the approval of this project,
then the applicant shall remit to the City, within five days of this
grant's approval, a cashier's check of $25.00 for a documentary
handling fee in connection with Fish and Game Code
requirements. Furthermore, if this project is not exempt from a
filing fee imposed because the project has more than a deminimis
impact on fish and wildlife, the applicant shall also pay to the
Department of Fish and Game any such fee and any fine which the
Department determines to be owed.
0
The Planning Commission shall:
(a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and
(b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified
mail to Equilon Enterprises, LLC, 2255 N. Ontario, Burbank, CA
91504 and Deni Sutikna, A&E Engineering, 207 W. Alameda Ave.
#203, Burbank, CA 91502.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF MARCH 2002, BY
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR.
Steven Nelson, Chairman
I, James DeStefano, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Diamond Bar, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 26th day of March, 2002, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
James DeStefano, Secretary
6
E
Planning Engineering Construction Management
207 W. Alameda, Suite no. 203, Burbank, Ca, 91502 Ph. 818-842-3644, Fax. 818-842-3760
PROPOSED SIGN CRITERIA FOR SHELL GAS STATION
AT 3241 S. BREA CANYON ROAD
DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765
;r.
Date: February 22, 2002
To: Planning Staff
Subye'ct: Proposed sign program, 3241 S. Brea Canyon Rd.: Equilon Enterprises LLC
Applicant: A&S Engineering
INTRODUCTION
Proposed minor exterior modifications to the existing Shell building at the subject location base
on corporate specification to meet the; expressive of the aesthetic and design in contributes to the
image of Diamond Bar City.
SIGN CRITERIA
SIGN A
Reface the fascia of existing pole sign with the new "Shell" pectin:
(6x6)' Material: flexi-glass, internally illuminated
SIGN B
Remove existing wall sign `ETD"
SIGN C
Remove existing monument sign
SIGN D
Proposed the new pump toppers per Equilon spec.
6 @ 5'6" x 1'4" = (43,996 SQ FT)
Non -illuminated, red -white -yellow color
SIGN E
Proposed "Foot Mart" wall sign -decal
1 @ 4'11 " x 91" = (3.66 SQ FT)
Non -illuminated, red color
1
SIGN F Proposed wall sign -decal
1 @ 4'8" x 9" = (3.50 SQ FT)
Non -illuminated, red color
SIGN G Proposed "Enter" wall -sign -decal to replace the existing sign "Entrance"
1 @ 2'9" x 8" = (1.83 SQ FT)
Non -illuminated, red color
SIGN H Proposed "Exit" wall -sign -decal to replace the existing sign "Exit"
1 @ 2' x 8" = (1.3 3 SQ FT)
Non -illuminated, red color
SIGN I Proposed canopy sign — internally illuminated wordmark with translucent
sides.
4 @ 8'10" x 17 5/8" = (57.784 SQ FT)
Red color
SIGN J Proposed new monument sign
1 @ 8' x 4' = (32 SQ FT)
Flexi-glass, internally illuminated
White, red, yellow, black, gray color
SIGN K Remove existing price sign
2@3'x6'
2
Cy S� tl 1 C1 —
g
�p
I
\
7
7�
t
I■$§
I
\
7
I '
�rf o
" �
I�_z—a—aa—e—�
I
I
CZ -
i �yyq�qtOODi — N fl a N O n V 1 0$
City of Diamond Bar
PLANNING COMMISSION
Staff Report
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER:
REPORT DATE: March 19, 2002
MEETING DATE: March 26, 2002
CASE/FILE NUMBER: Development Review No. 2001-23, Minor Conditional Use
Permit No. 2001-13
APPLICATION REQUEST: A request to remodel and add approximately 2,209 square
feet to an existing legal nonconforming, two-story, single-
family residence of 3,025 square feet including decks,
porch, patio, and three car garage
PROPERTY LOCATION:
PROPERTY OWNER:
APPLICANT:
BACKGROUND:
22245 Steeplechase Lane (Lot 171 of Tract No. 30578)
Donald Hermann
22245 Steeplechase Lane
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
S & W Development
20272 Carrey Road
Walnut, CA 91789
The property owner, Donald Hermann, and applicant, S & W Development, are requesting
approval to remodel and add approximately 2,209 square feet to an existing legal nonconforming,
two-story, single-family residence of 3,025 square feet including decks, porch, patio, and three
car garage.
The project's address is 22245 Steeplechase Lane (Lot 171 of Tract No. 30578), Diamond Bar,
California, within the gated community identified as "The Country Estates." The parcel is 1.29
gross acres. A Restricted Use Area is at the rear of the property, however the proposed project
is not within this area. The lot is nearly rectangular shape and slopes downward from
Steeplechase Lane to the rear of the property.
The project site is zoned R-1-20,000 for single-family residence. Its General Plan Land Use
designation is Rural Residential (RR) 1/du/acre. Generally, the following zones surround the
subject site: to the north is the R-1-40,000 Zone and to the south, east and west is the R-1-20,000
Zone.
REVIEW AUTHORITY/APPLICATIONS
• Development Review
This application requires Development Review by the Planning Commission per the City's
Development Code, Section 22.48.020.A(1), which states that Development Review is required
for projects involving a building permit for reconstruction and additions to structures which are
equal to 50 percent or greater of the floor area of the existing structures on the site. Therefore,
the addition of 2,209 square feet to an existing 3,025 square structure applies to the above
requirement.
The purpose of this review process is to establish consistency with the General Plan through the
promotion of high aesthetic and functional standards to complement and add to the economic,
physical, and social character of the City. The process will also ensure that new development and
intensification of existing development yields a pleasant living, working, or shopping environment
and attracts the interest of residents, workers, shoppers and visitors as the result of consistent
exemplary design.
• Legal Nonconforming Status -Minor Conditional Use Permit
The existing parcel was approved by Tract Map No. 30578, Lot 171, on April 23, 1969 as 1.29
acres. The existing structure was approved using the Los Angeles County Code in 1977 and met
the required setbacks of that Code prior to the City's incorporation.
The setback requirement for the Los Angeles County Code was:
• Front 20 feet
• Sides 5 feet on one side, 10 feet on the other
• Rear 15 feet
• Height Average Finish Grade no more than 35 feet
The current Diamond Bar Development Code requires setbacks of:
• Front 30 feet
• Sides 10 feet on one side, 15 feet on the other
• Rear 25 feet
• Height shall not exceed 35' from the finish grade at any exterior wall of the structure
to the highest point of the roofline
VA
Note that the setback standards have changed from the Los Angeles County Code. In this case
the front and side setbacks do not meet the standards set forth in Diamond Bar's Development
Code. Therefore, this application is considered a nonconforming parcel/structure. These are
defined as any parcel or structure that was legally created or constructed prior to the adoption of
the current Diamond Bar Development Code adopted November 3, 1998, and which does not
conform to current Code provisions/standards prescribed for the zoning district in which the use
is located.
The addition, enlargement, extension, reconstruction, relocation or structural alteration of a
nonconforming structure may be allowed with Minor Conditional Use Permit approval, in
compliance with Chapter 22.56. The Planning Director or his designee may approve proposed
projects of less than 50% providing that the additions or improvements are less than 50% of the
existing square footage, the site coverage is no more than 40 percent, that the project conforms
to applicable provisions of the Development Code, and the exterior limits of new construction do
not exceed the applicable height limit or encroach further into the setbacks than the comparable
portions of the existing structure where the nonconformity exists. In this case the nonconformity
is in the front and side.
This proposed project conforms to applicable provisions of the Development Code, the site
coverage is less than 40 percent, and it meets the required height limitations and does not
encroach further into the setbacks than the existing structure in the front. However, the proposed
project is more than 50 percent of the existing square footage. Therefore a public hearing by the
Hearing Officer and approval of a Minor Conditional Use Permit and findings are required.
• Planning Commission Authority
Pursuant to Development Code Section 22.48.030, the highest level of authority shall make
concurrent processing; therefore, the Planning Commission shall hear both applications.
ANALYSIS:
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW/MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
0 Development Standards
The following is a comparison of the City's development standards and the project's proposed
development standards:
City's, Development Standards
Setbacks (main structure):
Front yard -30' from property line
Side yards -10' & 15' minimum from
Pror)ertv line
3
Development Standards
1. Setbacks (main structure):
Front yard- 25' from property line*
Porch 20' from property line*
Side yards- 12'4" and 11'9" from property
line*
• Rear yard -25' minimum from property line
• Rear yard -meets requirement
• Site Coverage -overall maximum 40%
• Site Covera a -A roximatel 5%
2. Building Height: Maximum 35'
2. Building Height: Maximum 24.5'
3. Parking:
3. Parking:**
• Minimum two -car garage with each bay
Existing three -car garage 28' x 21.5' and
minimum 10'x20'
driveway
4. Accessory Structures -None proposed
4. Accessory Structures -None proposed
* Front and side setbacks are legal nonconforming and require a Minor Conditional use Permit
with Findings of Fact.
** There are a total of four bedrooms and a hobby room that can be used as a fifth bedroom.
Though the existing three car garage does not meet the current Development Code size
standard, staff anticipates adequate parking. Other products with five bedrooms have been
approved with a three car garage.
• Architectural Features and Colors
The proposed project's architectural design and palette are compatible with the eclectic
architectural style of other homes within The Country Estates, and are consistent with the City's
General Plan, Development Code, and Design Guidelines. Per the architect, the proposed
project's architectural style is a New England design. The project's architectural features include
the use of two-story entry/foyer and shingles on the cupola, decorative windows and roof accent
piece; decks and patios with wooden balustrade and Victorian accents at corners; and layering
of materials and finishes via multi-levels of roof lines with brown multicolored asphalt shingles, two
colors of stucco, brick accents, and shingle exteriors to add texture and contrast. The applicant
has received the approval of "The Country Estates" Homeowners' Association Architectural
Committee. A copy of the approved colors/materials board is attached.
• Floor Plans
The proposed single-family structure consists of two -stories. The first -story includes the two-story
open entry/foyer, living room, dining room, kitchen with nook, family room with bar and fireplace,
sitting area, guest bedrooms with bath, powder room and the three -car garage. The second story
includes open area proposed for office use; the master bedroom with bath, walk in closet and
deck; hobby room with deck; laundry; hall bath; and two bedrooms, one with bath and both with
deck.
• Covenant and Agreement
As with many approvals, a condition of approval has been added that the owner is required to
complete and record a "Covenant and Agreement to Maintain a Single Family Residence" on a
form to be provided by the City. The covenant must be completed and recorded with the Los
Angeles County's Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of a building permit.
4
SITE WORK
The subject reconstruction/remodel) is on the existing pad. No grading or retaining walls are
anticipated. Should it be necessary to work more than 50 cubic yards of earth, the Public Works
Division will require a grading/drainage plan.
LANDSCAPING
The landscape/irrigation plan is shown on the site plan and indicates the type of planting and
location. The landscaping/irrigation is required to be installed prior to the Planning Division's final
inspection or the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. Additionally, it is noted for the applicant
that any walls, gates, fountains, etc. that may be proposed within the front setback shall not
encroach into the street's dedicated easement; nor, shall any such structure or dense plant
material proposed within the front setback exceed a maximum height of 42 inches.
PRESERVED/PROTECTED TREES
The applicant's signed tree preservation statement indicates that no activity will take place within
five (5) feet of the outer dripline of any preserved/protected trees: oak, walnut, sycamore, willow,
or naturalized California Pepper. A site visit confirms there are no preserved tree requirements
for this site.
VIEW IMPACT
The terrain in the vicinity of Steeplechase Lane is hilly. The parcels on Steeplechase Lane
generally follow the ridgeline (higher elevations) and slope from the street downward (lower
elevations) at the rear of the lots. Lot 171 has easements and restrictions, however the subject
reconstruction is not within these areas. The neighboring parcels are single-family residences. By
maintaining the height limits of the Development Code, the remodel will not impact neighboring
properties.
ADDITIONAL REVIEW
The Public Works Division and the Building and Safety Division reviewed this project. Their
comments are included in both the report and the conditions of approval.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING:
On March 12, 2002, 75 property owners within a 500 -foot radius of the project site were notified
by mail. On March 15, 2002, notification of the public hearing for this project was made in the San
Gabriel Valley Tribune and Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers; and a notice of public hearing
on a display board was posted at the site and displayed for at least 10 days before the public
hearing; as well as three other posted within the vicinity of the application.
5
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT:
Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City has
determined that the proposed project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to the guidelines of the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA), Section 15301(e)(2)(A).
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review No. 2001-23,
Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2001-13, Findings of Fact, and conditions of approval, as listed
within the attached resolution.
REQUIRED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FINDINGS:
1. The design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with the General Plan,
development standards of the applicable district, design guidelines, and architectural criteria
for specialized area (e.g., theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards, or
planned developments);
2. The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the use and
enjoyment of neighboring existing or future development, and will not create traffic or
pedestrian hazards;
3. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the characteristics
of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain and enhance the harmonious orderly and
attractive development contemplated by Chapter 22.48, the General Plan, City Design
Guidelines, or any applicable specific plan;
4. The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its
occupants and visiting public; as well as, its neighbors through good aesthetic use of
materials, texture, and color that will remain aesthetically appealing;
5. The proposed project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or
materially injurious (e.g., negative affect on property values or resale(s) of property) to the
properties or improvements in the vicinity; and
6. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
REQUIRED NONCONFROMING STRUCTURES FINDINGS:
The addition, enlargement, extension, reconstruction, relocation or structural alteration of the
nonconforming structure would not result in the structure becoming:
1. Incompatible with other structures in the neighborhood;
2. Inconsistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan;
3. A restriction to the eventual/future compliance with the applicable regulations of this
Development Code;
1.1
4. Detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of persons residing in the neighborhood;
5. Detrimental and/or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood.
REQUIRED MINOR CONDITIONAL. USE PEMIT FINDINGS:
1. The proposed use is allowed within the subject zoning district with the approval of a Minor
conditional Use Permit and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Development
Code and the Municipal Code;
2. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan;
3. The design, location, size and operating characteristics of the proposed use are compatible
with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity;
4. The subiect site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of use being proposed
including access, provisions of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and the
absence of physical constraints;
5. Granting the Minor Conditional Use Permit will not be detrimental to the public interest, health,
safety, convenience or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property or improvements
in the vicinity and zoning districts in which the property is located, and;
6. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Prepared by: Linda Kay Smith, Development Services Assistant
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Draft Resolution of Approval;
2. Applications;
3. Tree Statement dated December 12, 2001;
4. Aerial;
5. Sample -Covenant and Agreement to Maintain a Single Family Residence;
6. Chosen Colors;
7. Exhibit "A" - site plan, floor plan, elevations, landscape plan, and materials/color's board,
dated March 26, 2002.
D: WORD-LINDA/PLANCOMM/PROJECTS/DR 01-23 22245 STEEPLECHASE/REP DR 01-23...
7
PLANNING COM
RESOLUTION NOM 0020- x DK"'AFT
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
NO. 2001-23, MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2001-13
AND CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION 15301(E)(2)(A), A REQUEST
TO REMODEL ,AND ADD APPROXIMATELY 2,209 SQUARE
FEET TO AN EXISTING LEGAL NONCONFORMING, TWO-
STORY, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE OF 3,025 SQUARE FEET
INCLUDING DECKS, PORCH, PATIO, AND THREE CAR
GARAGE. THE PROJECT SITE IS LOCATED AT 22245
STEEPLECHASE LANE (LOT 171 OF TRACT NO. 30578),
DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA.
A. Recitals
The property owner, Donald Hermann, and applicant, S & W Development
have filed an application to approve Development Review No. 2001-23,
Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2001-13, for a property located at 22245
Steeplechase Lane, Diamond Bar, Los Angeles County, California and part
of the gated development identified as 'The Country Estates," as described
in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject
Development Review and Categorical Exemption shall be referred to as the
"Application."
2. On March 12, 2002, 75 property owners within a 500 -foot radius of the
project site were notified by mail. On March 15, 2002, notification of the
public hearing for this project was made in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune
and Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers; and a notice of public hearing
on a display board was posted at the site and displayed for at least 10 days
before the public hearing; as well as three other posted within the vicinity of
the application.
3. On March 26, 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Application.
B. Resolution
NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows:
The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The Planning Commission hereby determines that the project identified
above in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA) and guidelines
promulgated thereunder. This is pursuant to Section 15301(e)(2)(A) of Article
19 of Chapter 3, Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
3. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds and determines that,
having considered the record as a whole including the findings set forth
below, and changes and alterations which have been incorporated into and
conditioned upon the proposed project set forth in the application, there is no
evidence before this Planning commission that the project proposed herein
will have the potential of an adverse effect on wild life resources or the
habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Based upon substantial evidence,
this Planning commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effects
contained in Section 753.5 (d) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth herein, this Planning
Commission, hereby finds as follows:
(a) The project relates to a parcel at 22245 Steeplechase Lane (Lot 171
of Tract No. 30578), Diamond Bar, CA, within the gated community
identified as "The Country Estates." The project site is approximately
1.29 gross. A Restricted Use Area is at the rear of the property,
however the proposed project is not within this area. The lot is nearly
rectangular shape and slopes downward from Steeplechase Lane to
the rear of the property.
(b) The General Plan Land Use designation is Rural Residential (RR), 1
du/acre. The project site is zoned Single -Family Residence, R-1-
20,000.
(c) Generally, the following zones surround the subject site: to the north
is the R-1-40,000 Zone and to south, east and west is the R-1-20,000
Zone.
(d) The application is a request to remodel and add approximately 2,209
square feet to an existing legal nonconforming, two-story, single-
family residence of 3,025 square feet including decks, porch, patio,
and three car garage
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
(e) The design and layout of the proposed development are consistent
with the General Plan, development standards of the applicable
district, design guidelines, and architectural criteria for specialized
area (e.g., theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards,
or planned developments.
The project site, currently developed with a two-story, single-family
residence, was established before the adoption of the City's General
Plan and current Development Code. The adopted General Plan of
July 25, 1995 has a land use designation of Rural Residential (1
du/acre). The current application complies with the City's General
Plan objectives and strategies related to maintaining the integrity of
residential neighborhoods and open space, the current Diamond Bar
Development Code, and the City's Design Guidelines. There is no
specific plan.
The existing structure was built using the Development Standards of
the Los Angeles County Code prior to the City's incorporation and is
considered a legal nonconforming structure. Per the current
Development Code, the Planning Director or his designee may
approve proposed projects providing that the additions or
improvements are less than 50% of the existing square footage, the
site coverage is no more than 40 percent, that the project conforms
to applicable provisions of the Development Code, and the exterior
limits of new construction do not exceed the applicable height limit or
encroach further into the setbacks than the comparable portions of
the existing structure where the nonconformity exists. In this case the
nonconformity is in the front and side.
The proposed project conforms to applicable provisions of the
Development Code, the site coverage is less than 40 percent and is
comparable with the existing neighborhood, and it meets the required
height limitations and does not encroach further into the setbacks
than the existing structure in the front or side. Though the proposed
project is more than 50 percent of the existing square footage, a
concurrent application has been made with findings below for the
approval of a Minor Conditional Use Permit.
The terrain in the vicinity of Steeplechase Lane is hilly. The proposed
two-story application is not considered an impact to the view corridor
of surrounding properties.
(f) The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere
with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future
development, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards.
Shadow Canyon Drive and Steeplechase Lane adequately serve the
project site. These streets are designed to handle minimum traffic
created by residential development.
The project site is currently developed with a two-story single-family
residence. The proposed reconstruction/remodeling does not change
the existing use of a single-family residence. Although the proposed
addition enlarges the existing residence, and is a two-story structure,
3
it meets the 35 feet height limitation per the Development Code. The
structure is not expected to unreasonably interfere with the use and
enjoyment of neighboring existing or future development with regard
to view or tragic.
(g) The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible
with the characteristics of the surrounding neighborhood and will
maintain and enhance the harmonious, orderly and attractive
development contemplated by Chapter 22.48, the General Plan, City
Design Guidelines, or any applicable specific plan.
The proposed project's New England design is compatible with the
eclectic architectural style of other homes within "The Country
Estates," and is consistent with the City's Design Guidelines and
Development Code. The project uses architectural styling with the use
of two-story entry/foyer and shingles on the cupola, decorative
windows and roof accent pieces; decks and patios with wooden
balustrade and Victorian accents at comers; and layering of materials
and finishes via multi-levels of roof lines with brown multicolored
asphalt shingles, two colors of stucco, brick accents, and shingle
exteriors to add texture and contrast.
Additionally, the colors and materials utilized are compatible with the
homes within the surrounding area. The applicant has obtained the
approval of the architectural committee of `The Country Estates."
(h) The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable
environment for its occupants and visiting public, as well as its
neighbors, through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, and color
that will remain aesthetically appealing.
A project colors/materials board is provided. The colors, materials,
and textures proposed are complimentary to the existing homes within
the area while offering variety and low levels of maintenance.
(i) The proposed project will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, or welfare or materially injurious (e.g., negative affect on
property values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
City permits, inspections and soils reports are required for
construction and will ensure that the finished project will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially
injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Additionally,
a Covenant and Agreement is required and runs with the land to
maintain a single family residence
4
The addition of square footage to the main structure follows the line
of the existing two-story structure in the both the front and side, and
maintains a 35 feet height; therefore, the proposed application has no
negative affect or impact to the view corridor of surrounding
properties.
(j) The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
The environmental evaluation shows that the proposed project is
categorically exempt pursuant to the guidelines of the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA), Sections 15301(e)(2)(A).
NONCONFROMING STRUCTURES
(k) The addition, enlargement, extension, reconstruction, relocation or
structural alteration of the nonconforming structure would not result
in the structure becoming incompatible with other structures in the
neighborhood.
As stated in Item (g), the proposed project is compatible with other
structures in the vicinity. Many two-story structures in the vicinity have
remodeled and added the second -story and increased square
footage.
(1) The addition, enlargement, extension, reconstruction, relocation or
structural alteration of the nonconforming structure would not result
in the structure becoming inconsistent with the General Plan or any
applicable specific plan.
As stated in Items (e) and (g), the proposed project is consistent with
the City's General Plan objectives and strategies, Chapter 22.48 of
the Development Code, and City Design Guidelines.
(m) The addition, enlargement, extension, reconstruction, relocation or
structural alteration of the nonconforming structure would not result
in the structure becoming a restriction to the eventual/future
compliance with the applicable regulations of this Development Code.
The existing parcel was approved by Tract Map No. 30578, Lot 171,
on April 23, 1969 as 1.29 acres. The existing structure was
completed under the Los Angeles County Code in 1977 and met the
required setbacks of that Code prior to the City's incorporation. The
current Diamond Bar Development Code requires minimum lot size as
1 du/acre in Rural Residential Zone (RR). The front and side
setbacks for this zone have changed from the Los Angeles County
Code of 20 feet to 30 feet and 10 feet to 15 feet, respectively. The
application is considered a nonconforming parcel and structure.
5
r-11
These are defined as any parcel or structure that was legally created
or constructed prior to the adoption of the current Diamond Bar
Development Code adopted November 3, 9998, and which does not
conform to current Code provisions/standards prescribed for the
zoning district in which the use is located. The proposed project
conforms to the other applicable provisions of this Development Code
and the exterior limits of the new construction do not exceed the
applicable height limit or encroach further into the setbacks than the
comparable portions of the existing structure in the front and side
where the nonconformity exists. No further nonconforming status of
this parcel is anticipated.
(n) The addition, enlargement, extension, reconstruction, relocation or
structural alteration of the nonconforming structure would not result
in the structure becoming detrimental to the health, safety, and
general welfare of persons residing in the neighborhood.
City permits, inspections and soils reports are required for
construction and will ensure that the finished project will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially
injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Additionally,
a Covenant and Agreement is required and runs with the land to
maintain a single family residence
(o) The addition, enlargement, extension, reconstruction, relocation or
structural alteration of the nonconforming structure would not result
in the structure becoming detrimental and/or injurious to property and
improvements in the neighborhood.
As stated in Items (e -h), the architectural design of the proposed
development is compatible with the characteristics of the surrounding
neighborhood and will maintain the harmonious, orderly and attractive
development contemplated by Chapter 22.48, the General Plan, City
Design Guidelines, or any applicable specific plan.
Also, as stated in Item (i), City permits, inspections and soils reports
are required for construction and will ensure that the finished project
will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or
materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity.
MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
(p) The proposed use is allowed within the subject -zoning district with the
approval of a Minor Conditional Use Permit and complies with all
other applicable provisions of this Development Code and the
Municipal Code.
L
As state in Items (e -o), the proposed use is allowed within the zoning
district and complies with all other applicable provisions of the
Development Code and Municipal Code.
(q) The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any
applicable specific plan.
As state in Item (e), the proposed use is consistent with the General
Plan and any there is not applicable specific plan.
(r) The design, location, size and operating characteristics of the
proposed use are compatible with the existing and future land uses
in the vicinity.
As stated in Items (e -o), the design, location, size, etc. is compatible
with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity.
(s) The subject site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity
of use being proposed including access, provisions of utilities,
compatibility with adjoining land uses, and the absence of physical
constraints.
As stated in Items (e -o), the subject site is physically suitable for the
type and density/intensity of use being proposed including access,
provisions of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and the
absence of physical constraints.
(t) Granting the Minor Conditional Use Permit will not be detrimental to
the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or
materially injurious to person, property or improvements in the vicinity
and zoning districts in which the property is located.
City permits„ inspections and soils reports are required for
construction and will ensure that the finished project will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially
injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Additionally,
a Covenant and Agreement is required and runs with the land to
maintain a single family residence.
The addition of square footage to the main structure follows the line
of the existing two-story structure in the both the front and side, and
maintains a 3,15 feet height, therefore, the proposed application has no
negative affect or impact to the view corridor of surrounding
properties.
Additionally, the colors and materials utilized are compatible with the
homes within the surrounding area. The applicant has obtained the
approval of the architectural committee of `The Country Estates."
7
f'
(u) The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
The environmental evaluation shows that the proposed project is
categorically exempt pursuant to the guidelines of the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA), Sections 15301(e)(2)(A).
5. Based upon the findings and conclusion set forth above, the Planning
Commission hereby approves this Application subject to the following
conditions:
(a) The project shall substantially conform to site plan, floor plans,
elevations, and materials/colors board collectively labeled as Exhibit
"A" dated March 26, 2002, as submitted to and approved by the
Planning Commission.
(b) The subject site shall be maintained in a condition that is free of
debris both during and after the construction, addition, or
implementation of the entitlement granted herein. The removal of all
trash, debris, and refuse, whether during or subsequent to
construction, shall be done only by the property owner, applicant or
by duly permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by the
City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste
from residential, commercial, construction, and industrial areas within
the City. It shall be the applicant's obligation to insure that the waste
contractor utilized has obtained permits from the City of Diamond Bar
to provide such services.
(c) Before construction begins, the applicant shall install temporary
construction fencing pursuant to the Building and Safety Division's
requirements along the project site's perimeter. This fencing shall
remain until the Building Official approves its removal.
(d) The Applicant shall provide temporary sanitation facilities while under
construction.
(e) The front yard landscaping/irrigation shall be installed prior to the
Planning Division's final inspection or Certificate of Occupancy
issuance. Any walls, gates, fountains, etc. that may be proposed
within the front setback shall not encroach into street's dedicated
easement or exceed a maximum 42 inches in height.
(f) Applicant shall submit an application to the Walnut Valley Water
District as necessary, and submit their approval to the Planning
Division prior to the issuance of building permits.
(g) A permit for demolition shall be obtained from the South Coast Air
Quality Management District.
8
r
(h) Drainage pattern shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works
Division; surface water shall drain away from the building at a 2%
minimum slope.
(i) Site, driveway grade, and house design shall be approved by the Fire
Department. The maximum slope is 15% per the Public Works
Division.
(j) The single-family structure shall meet the 1998 California Codes:
Universal Building Code, Universal Plumbing Code, Universal
Mechanical Code, and the 1998 National Electrical Code
requirements.
(k) The minimum design wind pressure shall be 80 miles per hour and
"C" exposure.
(I) The single-family structure requires Fire Department approval and is
located in "Fire Zone 4" and shall meet the following requirements of
that fire zone:
(1) All roof covering shall be "Fire Retardant, Class A"; the roofs
shall be fire stopped at the eaves to preclude entry of the
flame or members under the fire;
(2) All enclosed under -floor areas shall be constructed as exterior
walls;
(3) All openings into the attic, floor, and/or other enclosed areas
shall be covered with corrosion -resistant wire mesh not less
than '/i inch nor more than '/z inch in any dimension except
where such openings are equipped with sash or door;
(4) Chimneys shall have spark arresters of maximum '/2 inch
screen.
(m) This single-faimily structure shall meet the State Energy
Conservation Standards.
(n) Due to the site's topography, applicant shall comply with special
design requirements as specified in the California Building Code,
Section 18.4.3, building setback, top and toe of slopes.
(o) The single-family residence shall not be utilized in a manner that
creates adverse effects upon the neighborhood and environmental
setting of the residential site to levels of dust, glare/light, noise, odor,
traffic, or other disturbances to the existing residential neighborhood
and shall not result in significantly adverse effects on public services
and resources. The single-family residence shall not be used for
commercial/institutional purposes, or otherwise used as a separate
dwelling. The property shall not be used for regular gatherings which
9
result in a nuisance or which create traffic and parking problems iri'the
neighborhood.
(p) The Applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire
Department and City Planning, Building and Safety, and Public Works
Divisions.
(q) The owner shall complete and record a "Covenant and Agreement to
Maintain a Single Family Residence on a form to be provided by the
City. The covenant must be completed and recorded with the Los
Angeles County's Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of a building
permit.
(r) This grant is valid for two (2) years and shall be exercised (i.e.
construction) within that period or this grant shall expire. A one -(1)
year extension may be approved when submitted to the City in writing
at least 60 days prior to the expiration date. The Planning
Commission will consider the extension request at a duly noticed
public hearing in accordance with Chapter 22.72 of the City of
Diamond Bar Development Code.
(s) This grant shall not be effective for any purpose until the permittee
and owner of the property involved (if other than the permittee) have
filed, within fifteen (15) days of approval of this grant, at the City of
Diamond Bar Community and Development Services Department,
their affidavit stating that they are aware and agree to accept all the
conditions of this grant. Further, this grant shall not be effective until
the permittee pays remaining City processing fees.
(t) If the Department of Fish and Game determines that Fish and Game
Code Section 711.4 applies to the approval of this project, then the
applicant shall remit to the City, within five days of this grant's
approval, a cashier's check of $25.00 for a documentary handling fee
in connection with Fish and Game Code requirements. Furthermore,
if this project is not exempt from a filing fee imposed because the
project has more than a deminimis impact on fish and wildlife, the
applicant shall also pay to the Department of Fish and Game any
such fee and any fine which the Department determines to be owed.
The Planning Commission shall:
(a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and
(b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail
to Donald Hermann, 22245 Steeplechase Lane, Diamond Bar, CA
91765 and S & W Development, 20272 Carrey Road, Walnut, CA
91789.
10
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26th DAY OF MARCH 2002, BY THE PLANNING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF: DIAMOND BAR,
As
Joe Ruzicka, Chairman
I, James DeStefano, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 26th day of March 2002, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
James DeStefano, Secretary
D: WORD-LINDA/PLANCOMM/PROJECTSOR 01-23 22245 STEEPLECHASE/RESO DR 01-23...
11
COMMUNTT'. EVELOPMI
21660 F. Copley Drive ;Suite I ATTACHMENT "2"
(909)396-5676 Fax (9050861-1 APPLICATIONS
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW I
Record Owner Applicant
Name ���MANR,DDNALD
(Last name first)
Address A5 SterrLECRASe l!J
City DiAN1m BAP.' CA
Zip 91�r s
Phone(9t7� 3JG -375]
FPL f' 4 i -
Deposit S
Receipt#
By 1�
/ Date Rec'd
7- - - c1 i
Applicant's Agent
T�AIGShN � "R C
(Last name first)
20272 Caep Rp
WALwtrr, CA
17 29
Phonc(90� 5� S -80D D
NOTE: It is the applicant's responsibility to notify the Community Development Director in writing of any change of the
principals involved during the processing of this case.
(Attach a separate sheet, if necessary, including names, addresses, and signatures of members of partnerships, joint ventures, and dirzunrs
of corporations.)
Consent: I cernfy that I em the owner of the herein described property and permit the applicant to fide this request.
Signed Data i
3
(All record owners) ---- <t,(
Certification: 1, the undersigned, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information herein provided is correct
to the best of my knowledge.
Print Name S Q V J n£/ p• I t) F ME S.T
(Applicant or Agent)
Signed
(Applicant or Agent)
Date
Location _222AS STEEpj;nepAcE Ltiy DiAmnkn Bra . CA 91i6s
(Street address or tract and lot number)
Zoning -- LCR 12n000 HNM_Ti?a^r 5�g LoT 01 1
Previous Cases
Present Use of Site RESIDE1J nA — f11J6LE FANIILy
Use applied for «ria bF L / An n tit n u
Area devoted to structures
/ s, .1► _lel �. — — /L l (!
Landscaping/Open space
Project Size 10,010 -% &-LLp Lot Coverage 3.q Proposed density,
(Limits/Acres)
Style of Architecture wtu W
Number of Floors Proposed 2 Slope of Roof
Grading' iteN-k
Cut 144 e
Import Nonce If yes, Quantity
Export Nate If yes, Quantity
If yes, Quantity.
Fill M(We
I:3
OND a IL
CM OF DIAMOND BAR
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY do DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
Planning Division
21660 E. Coplev Drive Suite 190, Diamond Bar, CA 91765
(909)396-5676 Fax(909)861-3117
1
u,h ,CONDITIONAL
Record Owner
- (Last name first)
JL ..tat
�ftFXVZ it
Phonct9Ul 39G17751
Fax ( )
USE PERMIT APPLICATION
Applicant
W 9maz pmtyT
(Last name first)
Casco;?/ f'' J,
FPL
Dcpost S
Receipt a
B%
Date Rcc'd _/2 -,/-z
FOR CM"USE
Applicant's Agent
NOTE: It is the applicant's responsibility to notify the City in writing of any change of the principals involved during the
processing of this case.
I
(Attach separate sheet, if necessary, including names, addresses, and signatures of members of partnerships, joint vcnturcs, and directors of
corporations.)
Consent 71tMhawl I am the owner of the herein described property and permit She applicant to Erle this requeit
Sieved 6Date 1113 ® I
Zkffl-ecord owners)
Certification: 1, the undersigned, hereby certify under pena4 of perjury that the information herein provided iu correct to the
best of my knowledge.
Print Name f, ?-- W
(Applicant or
Signed
Location
Date
(Street address or tract and lot number) -
Zoning LGR I DOOD House Numbering Map-TRAr-r3o5�7f3 f d� Dl-:/
Previous Cases ^
Present Use of Site (�Erit_p(j� �SIN6LI✓ ii/tWtIIX
Use applied for {zMAW , /� AbOt-tlt�►J
City of Diamood Bar _
coNDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Project Size (gross acres) 0 020 r7�12 Project Density '
Previous Cases
Present Use of Site
►..r �:�u
for
'�..►� .0►��•
Domestic Water Source
Method of Sewage Disposal
Grading of Lots by Applicant? YES NO
(Sbow accessary grading design on site plan or tent. map)
Company/District
Sanitation District
Amount
Page TWO
CONDITIONAL USE PERIMrr BURDEN OF rAOOF
In addition to the information required in the application, the applicant shall substantiate to the satisfaction of the Piannine
Commission, the following facts: (answers must be full & complete)
A. That the requested use at the location proposed will not:
Adversely affect the health, peace, comfort or welfare of persons residing or workme in the surrounding
area, or
2. Be materially detrimental to the use, enjoyment or valuation of property of other persons located in the
vicinity of the site, or
Jeopardize, endanger or otherwise constitute a menace to the public health. safety or general welfare.
tiI0 7N> R1 Q t t,� (MU, n1bT prFG.�L'f Tke
B. That the proposed site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading
facilities, landscaping and other development features prescribed in this Title 22, or as is otherwise required in
order to integrate said use with the uses in the surrounding area.
Y55, IT'. _s ATI�QQWM
C. That the proposed site is adequately served:
1. By highways or streets of sufficient width and improved as necessary to carry the kind and quantity of
traffic such use would generate, and
2. By other public or private service facilities as are required.
Yes �T rs Ayom r y 5oxveo
Residential: _
Total Units Bachelor 1 Bedroom 2 Bim. & larger
3 _
Total Pkg. Cov. Pkg. Uncov. Pkg.
Project Size: 10,010 5e ILp'( gl Lot Coverage: 3 -� 0�
Density: I [ JfC , Maximttm Height W— (D ri No. of floors: Z
7 Sq. Footage 42 31 5F
Non-resideatial: _
Sq. ft. area No. of Bldgs. Occupant Load*
CUP Burden of Proof - Page 1
Parking: 3
Total Standard Compact Handicap
Landscaping:
Sq. feet
Grading: Y _ N ✓ If yes, Quantity:
Cut:
Fill:
Import: Y _ N If yes, Quantity:.
Export: Y _ N ✓ If yes, Quantity:
Occupant Load as calculated by the Building & Safety Division is required for all dining, takie-out or assembly use, churches,
health clubs, theaters, etc.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION (all ownership comprising the proposed lots)/pamel(s)
1.00 DIjj 10F: nMdX :& N_. t N - uta o� n lA'n10 Np l3Po-
Area devoted to structures Landscaping/Open spat
Residential Pro ject:4,z3� 5t and
(gross area) (No. of lots)
Proposed density 1
(Units/Acres)
Parking Required Provided
Standard
Compact
Handicapped
Total
Cagle,-ko
<-
Conditional Use Permit Burden of Proof - Page 2
ATTACHMENT "3"
TREE STATEMENT
TREE :PRESERVATION STATEMENT
( .) The subject property contains no oak, walnut,sycamore, willow, or naturalized
California Pepper trees.
(+/f The subject property contains one or more oak, walnut, sycamore, willow, or
naturalized California Pepper trees. The applicant anticipates that no activity
(grading and/or construction) will take place within five (5) feet of the outer
dripline of any oak, walnut, sycamore, willow, or naturalized California Pepper
tree.
( ) The subject property contains one or more oak, walnut, sycamore, willow, or
naturalized California Pepper trees. The applicant states that activity (grading
and/or construction) will take place within five (5) feet of the outer dripline
of any oak, walnut, sycamore, willow, or naturalized California Pepper tree. A
Tree Permit has been or will be applied for prior to any activity taking place on
the property.
(Applicant'*ia\turV!
(Date
if�lC1E.YI[i
GEOVIE`W'fRF'�7
WINDOWS 95/98/7000/NF i
RECORDING REQUEST BY:
City of Diamond Bar
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
City of Diamond Bar
21825 E. Copley Drive
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
ATTACHMENT"Y
SAMPLE COVENANT
& AGREEMENT
COVENANT AND AGREEMENT TO
MAINTAIN A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
The undersigned hereby certify that
are the owner(s) of the hereinafter described real property located at
in the City of Diamond Bar, County of Los Angeles,
commonly known as:
Use
State of California,
Legally described as Lot Tract Map No _
Assessor's Book and Parcel Number
And, I/we do hereby covenant and agree for ourselves, heirs, assigns,
transferees and successors, with the City of Diamond Bar (hereinafter "City") that the
above described property shall be used for single family residential purposes only, and
that no portion of the structure(s) or property shall be rented, leased or sold separate
and apart from any remaining portions of the property or structure(s).
This covenant and agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon
ourselves, future owners, their heirs, and successors and assignees and shall continue
in effect until and unless approved otherwise by the City of Diamond Bar is specifically
intended that the benefits and burdens of this covenant run with the land.
If the City is required to bring legal action to enforce this covenant, then the city
shall be entitled to its attorney fees and court costs.
M
DATED:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
On this day of , 200_ before me the undersigned Notary
Public in and for said State, personally appeared
personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be
the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that executed the same in authorized capacity(ies),
and that by signature(s) on the instrument the person(s) or the entity
upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Notary Public in and for said State
O ASPHALT ROOFING SHINGLES
CERTAIN TEED HIGHLANDS SHANGLE
(DRIFTWOOD COLOR)
O SHINGLE SIDING PANELS
CERTAINTEED CEDAR IMPRESSIONS
(RU911C CEDAR)
OND BAR COUNTrav E: T:� : v A: -,',;
5 Lazy Meadow Drivo
fond Bar, CA 91765
e Dlamond Bar Country Estates Assnria►inn ".tc!d-
auralttCOmmittee takas no exceptions to
krenan
wise statL�iio tiF. �toStN.�QN
immittee take any exceptions tmX'0"Z.ouw1,I cl,
s Angeles Building Dspartnlent or Building I,:"jo
other County or State Flugulatory Agencies.
THECKED
PROVEDAPPROVED IRE`,ii.jL;-,11T
BY DAF -Tl 1 t3'
O LA HABRA STUCCO (MIRAGE)
X•28
7—T
O EXISTING BRICKS 12- 1
j"',
ATTACHMENT "6"
COLORS
5A NEW BRICKS ( 2 1/2"H x 8"W )
Owens Corning Cultured Stone
Vintage Used Cultured Bricks (CB -4068)
(TO MATCH EXISTING)
PROJECT NAME & LOCATION.
MR. & MRS. DONALD HERMANN RESIDENCE
222.35 Steeplechase Ln, Diamond Bar, CA 91165
SHEET TITLE: T
MATERIAL BOARD _— I -----_--_-_--- --------__
TE: FEB.
l a
A.1 *A* WUF.VE1,0PN1ENT
ou:^:. ..y R-4
W.luul. ('A -61
SHEET NO.
O DECORATIVE LOUVERED SHUTTERS
O7 VINYL WINDOW
O GARAGE DOOR
i
APPROVED
�( .13 DISAPPROVED
CHECKED BY
BLUE TRIM PAINT COLOR
BEHR Premium Pius
(Shaker Square C40-76)
DIAMOND BAR COUNT ICY ESTATES ASSOCINHON
22815 Lazy Meadow Drive
Diamond Bar. CA 91765
The Diamond Bar Country Estates Association Archi-
tectural Committee takes no exceptions to the
unless oln-
erwise statedit
Inwr writing ions n orRestrictions does the Architectural
Committee take any exceptions to the County of
Los Angeles Building Department or Building Coda
or other County or State Regulatory Agencias.
0 ALUMINUM LOUVERS
❑ APPROVED AS NOTED
RESUBMIT
DATIFr3 .Aid 3
COPPER PAINT COLOR
BEHR Premium Plus
(Hearthstone C40-27)
NOTE: Copper finish is paint color only.
It shall not tarnish or get a weathered
finish (greenish color).
PROJECT NAME & LOCATION:
i
MR. & MRS. DONALD HERMANN RESIDENCE `
22245 Steeplechase Ln, Diamond Bar, CA 91765_
SHEET TITLE: A.2 S&NN D ]'ELOPMLNT
MATERIAL BOARD 193'3 C.n, , N..4
w.mu4 i'a tiv
DATE: FEB. 08 2002 NOTES: SHEET NO. """"" "•.....IM.
SREETINDEX
PROJECT INFORMATION
PROJECT SCOPE
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
AREA CALCULATED
.spa..
- ^I
mIN. 'Polio
x
'X -_ h
j EXHIBIT "A"
_.`.`-•s=•� _I _ _ DR 2001-23, MCUP 01-13
22245 STEEPLECHASE LANE
MARCH 25, 2002
E
€g
� 3
3 ?
fEETTITLE
1EET INDEX j
CINITY MAP
TEPLAN
:TAILED SITE PLANT
(CONCEPTUAL
LANDSCAPE PLAN)
T
0428
M�
j
5.
-j
F-
557
-----------
Fol
T—T-1
-----------------------
wit-I�,' �, r-�x`-11x-x-xl-<I- "- - - - - -x-x-
E OTM I
SAS
FIRST FLOOR PLAN
SCALE: 3/16- = 1'-0'
------------ ---------------------------------------------
allEE-r 7M2
FIRST FLOOR
PLAN
T --
I R0428
m�
SHEET TIRE
!, SECOND FLOOR
PLAN
vtam
F
I
ani
FRONT ELEVATION
SCALE; 3/19' = 1'-0'
RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION
SCALE : 3119• = 1'-p'
BACK ELEVATION LEFT SIDE ELEVATION
SCALE; 9119' = i'ti
SCALE :3/18' = 1'-0'
CROSS SECTION THRU A - A
SCALE: 311T = l' -T
8�
- 3
21
.El TRLE -moi
ELEVATIONS
CROSS SECTION
II
07 ADDL SECTICN
TU124W
�I.
I
Project Meetings Schedule
March 26, 2002
PLANNING COMMISSION
A&S Engineering (Shell Oil)
(Monument Signs & wall signs)
S & W DEVELOPMENT
(Remodel/Room Addition)
S & W DEVELOPMENT
(Single Family Residence)
DEVELOPMENT CODE
AMENDMENT
(Temporary Political Signs)
DEVELOPMENT CODE
AMENDMENT
(Computer Cafes)
HUANG, FEI/SAN YAO INTL
(Demolish and rebuild Single Family
Residence w/tree removal)
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS
DIAMOND BAR WEST/GOULD
(Single Family Residence)
DIAMOND BAR WEST/GOULD
(Single Familv Residence)
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
COMMUNITY & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Case # PM Location PC CC PC CC PC CC PC
3/26/02 4/2/02 4/9/02 4/16/02 4/23/02 5/7/02 5/14/02
CSP 2002-01 AJL 3241 BREA CANYON x
DR 2001-23 LKS 22245 STEEPLECHASE PH
MCUP 2001-13
MV 2001-18
DR 2001-18 LDM/ 22509 RIDGELINE ROAD Cont.
LKS PH
DCA 2002-02 AJL CITYWIDE PH
DCA 2002-01 1 AJL I CITYWIDE
PH
DR 2002-01I AJL 12492 INDIAN CREEK I I PH
TP 2002-01
Case!
I PM
I Location DCM
DCM
DCM
ADR 2002-02
LKS
2803 CRYSTAL RIDGE RD. PH
ADR 2002-01
LKS
2809 CRYSTAL RIDGE RD. PH
A ■.1'1aiai'% V rAUJ VU I N Case # PM
Location
ATLAN STAR/DIAMOND STAR CSP 2001-01 AJL 20855 GOLDEN SPRINGS
PLAZA APPLICANT NOTIFIED OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION — (Sign) WAITING FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
LEGEND
Pit = PUBLIC 11FARING
X = NON PUBLIC 11FARINC
Project Meetings Schedule
March 26, 2002
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
COMMUNITY & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
PENDING PROJECTS
Case #
PM
Location
(continued)
BUCHELE, FAUSTO/SHELL OIL
MCUP 2002-01
AJL
206 DIAMOND BAR BLVD.
APPLICANT NOTIFIED OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION —
(Off-site sale of alcoholic beverages)
WAITING FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
CHEUNG, STANLEY
CUP 2002-01
JDS
TTM 53430
PROCESSING
(Hillside Development - Residential)
DAGAM, V.C.
DR 2002-02
AJL
22604 RIDGELINE
APPLICANT NOTIFIED OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION —
(Sin le Family Residence)
I
WAITING FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
DAGAM, V.C.
ADR 2002-03
LKS
22119 STEEPLECHASE LN.
APPLICANT NOTIFIED OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION —
(Sin le Family Residence)
WAITING FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
GOULD, RICHARD/DB West
ADR 2002-04
2889 CRYSTAL RIDGE
PROCESSING
(Single Family Residence)
HANNA, SALIM
ADR 98-41(2)
LKS
1939 DERRINGER LN.
PROCESSING
(Converting storage area to guest area)
JMJR DESIGN
DR 2001-15
AJL
1194 CHISHOLM TRAIL
APPLICANT NOTIFIED OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION —
(Sin le Family Residence)
WAITING FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
KING, ANDREW
ADR 2002-06
24029 GOLD RUSH
PROCESSING
(Single Family Residence)
KING, ANDREW
ADR 2002-07
683 RADBURY
PROCESSING
(Single Family Residence
KING, ANDREW
ADR 2002-05
24037 GOLD RUSH
PROCESSING
(Single Family Residence)
LITTLE, ROBERT
MCUP 2000-9(1)
LKS
2102 ROCKY VIEW
APPLICANT NOTIFIED OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION —
(Second Unit Addition)
WAITING FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
MERICOM
MCUP 2001-11
AJL
21725 GATEWAY
APPLICANT NOTIFIED OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION —
(Cell Site)
WAITING FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
NOVAK & ASSOCIATES
CUP 2000-09
LDM
1155 S. DIAMOND BAR BL.
APPLICANT NOTIFIED OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION —
(Co -location Cell Site)
WAITING FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
OMAR, AKBAR
DR 2002-03
I
21671 GATEWAY CTR.
APPLICANT NOTIFIED OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION —
(Office Building)
WAITING FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Project Meetings Schedule
March 26, 2002
PENDING PROJECTS
TRENTON GROUP
(Revision - Fence)
WALNUT VALLEY UNIFIED
SCHOOL DISTRICT
Land Use Designation Change
Planning Area -4 to Specific Plan
Public Facilities to Specific Plan
WANG, GARY
(Single Family Residence)
WESTWOOD DESIGN
(1,600 sq. ft. addition0
XM SATELLTI'E RADIO, INC.
(Co -location Cell Site — DB High
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
COMMUNITY & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Case # PM Location
DR 2000-12(1) AJL 1440 BRIDGEGATE PROCESSING
GPA 2001-01 JDS DIAMOND CREST LANE ON HOLD PER WVUSD
DIAMOND BAR BL (Site D)
DR 2001-16 LKS 2760 STEEPLECHASE APPLICANT NOTIFIED OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION —
TP 2001-02 WAITING FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
DR 2001-19 AJL 23646 PROSPECT VALLEY APPLICANT NOTIFIED OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION —
MV 2001-16 WAITING FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
CUP 2000-10 LDM 21400 PATHFINDER APPLICANT NOTIFIED OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION —
WAITING FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION