Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/17/2013Tuesday, December 17, 2013 6:00 p.m. — Closed Session — Room CC -8 6:30 p.m. — Regular Meeting The Government Center South Coast Air Quality Management District/ Main Auditorium 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Carol Herrera Steve Tye Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Ling -Ling Chang Nancy A. Lyons Jack Tanaka Council Member Council Member Council Member City Manager James DeStefano City Attorney David DeBerry City Clerk Tommye Cribbins Copies of staff reports or other written documentation relating to agenda items are on file in the Office of the City Clerk, and are available for public inspection. If you have questions regarding an agenda item, please contact the City Clerk at (909) 839-7010 during regular business hours. In an effort to comply with the requirements of Title 11 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the City of Diamond Bar requires that any person in need of any type ofspecial equipment, assistance or a ccommodation(s) in order to communicate at a City public meeting, must inform the City Clerk a minimum of 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting. Have online access? City Council Agendas are now available on the City of Diamond Bar's web site at www.CityofDiamondBar.com Please refrain from smoking, eating or drinking in the Council chambers. The City of Diamond Bar uses recycled paper and encourages you to do the same. 111A)ION8 BAR CITY OF DIAMOND BAR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA December 17, 2013 Next Resolution No. 2013-35 Next Ordinance No. 14 (2013) CLOSED SESSION: 6:00 p.m., Room CC -8 Public Comments on Closed Session Agenda ► Government Code Section 54956.8 - Conference with Real Property Negotiators Property: Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard (City owns 1 acre) City Negotiator: City Manager Negotiating Parties: Walnut Valley Unified School District, Lennar and City of Diamond Bar Under Negotiations: Price and Terms of Sale of Property CALL TO ORDER: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: INVOCATION: ROLL CALL: 6:30 p.m. Mayor Pastor Mark Hopper Evangelical Free Church of Diamond Bar Council Members Chang, Lyons, Tanaka, Mayor Pro Tem Tye, Mayor Herrera Written materials distributed to the City Council within 72 hours of the City Council meeting are available for public inspection immediately upon distribution in the City Clerk's Office at 21810 Copley Dr., Diamond Bar, California, during normal business hours. December 17, 2013 PAGE 2 APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Mayor SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATES, PROCLAMATIONS: 1.1 Presentation of Certificates of Recognition to Krystal Spindler, Editor and Kirsten Khoury, Layout and Graphic Design for their outstanding job with the Windmill Magazine — Continued from December 3, 2013. 1.2 Presentation of Certificates of Recognition to Report for Reward Awardees for providing information that aided in the arrest of burglary suspects. BUSINESS OF THE MONTH: 1.3 Presentation of City Tile to Mr. G's Pizzeria & Pasta, 2767 S. Diamond Bar Boulevard, as Business of the Month, December, 2013. 2. CITY MANAGER REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 2.1 Introduction of Sheriff Deputy Heidy Villasenor - Special Assignment Deputy. 2.2 Overview of year-long schedule of activities planned in recognition of the City's 25 years of cityhood in 2014. PUBLIC COMMENTS: "Public Comments" is the time reserved on each regular meeting agenda to provide an opportunity for members of the public to directly address the Council on Consent Calendar items or matters of interest to the public that are not already scheduled for consideration on this agenda. Although the City Council values your comments, pursuant to the Brown Act, the Council generally cannot take any action on items not listed on the posted agenda. Please complete a Speaker's Card and give it to the City Clerk (completion of this form is voluntary). There is a five-minute maximum time limit when addressing the City Council. 4. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC COMMENT: Under the Brown Act, members of the City Council may briefly respond to public comments but no extended discussion and no action on such matters may take place. 5. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: 5.1 Special Planning Commission Meeting — December 19, 2013 — 7:00 p.m., - Windmill Community Room, 21810 Copley Drive. 5.2 Planning Commission Meeting — December 24, 2013 — 7:00 p.m., Windmill Community Room, 21810 Copley Drive. (Cancelled). December 17, 2013 PAGE 3 5.3 Christmas Holiday — December 24 and 25, 2013 - City Offices will be closed in Observance of the Christmas Holiday. City Offices will re -open Thursday, December 26, 2013 at 7:30 a.m. 5.4 Holiday Tree Curbside Collection Program — December 26, 2013 through January 10, 2014. Trees free of decorations and flocking may be left at the curb for free pickup during this period. Any tree over 6 ft. must be cut in half. 5.5 Late Night Transit Pass Sale — Thursday, December 26, 2013, - Until 7:00 p.m., Diamond Bar City Hall, 21810 Copley Drive. 5.6 Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting — December 26, 2013 — 7:00 p.m., Windmill Community Room, 21810 Copley Drive. (Cancelled). 5.7 New Year's Holiday — January 1, 2014 — City Offices will be closed Wednesday, January 1, 2014 in observance of the New Year's Day. City Offices will re -open Thursday, January 2, 2014. 5.8 City Council Meeting — January 7, 2014 — 6:30 p.m. AQMD/Government Center Auditorium, 21865 Copley Drive. 5.9 Traffic and Transportation Commission Meeting — January 9, 2014 7:00 p.m., Windmill Community Room, 21810 Copley Drive. 5.10 Planning Commission Meeting — January 14, 2014 — 7:00 p.m., Windmill Community Room, 21810 Copley Drive. 5.11 Winter Snow Fest — January 18, 2014 — 10:00 a.m. — 4:00 p.m. — Pantera Park, 738 Pantera Drive. 6. CONSENT CALENDAR: 6.1 City Council Minutes — Regular Meeting of December 3, 2013 — Approve as submitted. Requested by: City Clerk 6.2 Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes — Regular Meeting of October 24, 2013 — Receive and File. Requested by: Community Services Department December 17, 2013 PAGE 4 6.3 Planning Commission Minutes: (a) Regular Meeting of October 22, 2013 — Receive and File. (b) Regular Meeting of November 12, 2013 — Receive and File. Requested by: Community Development Department 6.4 Ratification of Check Register — Dated November 28, 2013 through December 11, 2013 totaling $455,518.75. Requested by: Finance Department 6.5 Approval of Adjourning the January 7, 2014 City Council Meeting to January 21, 2014. Recommended Action: Approve. Requested by: City Manager 6.6 Adopt Ordinance No. 14(2013): Amending Division 5 of Chapter 8.12 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code Relating to Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) Requirements by Imposing Rainwater Low Impact Development (LID) Strategies on Projects that Require Building, Grading and Encroachment Permits. Recommended Action: Approve for Second Reading by Title Only, Waive Full Reading and Adopt Ordinance No. 14 (2013). Requested by: Public Works Department 6.7 Reprogram Contingency Funds from Diamond Bar Center Remodel Project ($20,000) to Diamond Bar Center Maintenance and Operation Budget. Recommended Action: Approve. Requested by: City Manager 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 6:45 p.m., or as soon thereafter as matters may be heard. 7.1 Public Hearing — Adopt Resolution No. 2013 -XX: Approving the Community Development Block Grant Program Including $201,787 in Fiscal Year 2014-15 Funds and $11,504 from Unallocated Balance of Funds for the Total Amunt of $231,291. Recommended Action: Receive Staff Report, Open Public Hearing, Receive Testimony, Close Public Hearing and Adopt. December 17, 2013 PAGE 5 Requested by: City Manager COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: 8.1 Willow Heights — Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295, Development Review and Tree Permit (Planning Case No. PL2013- 229). (Continued from December 3, 2013). Recommended Action: There are four options for the Council to consider, which are described below: 1. If the Council chooses to approve the project as previously submitted, adopt Resolution No. 2013 -XX approving the Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Development Review, and Tree Permit for Planning Case No. PL2013-229, to allow the subdivision for the development of 182 for -sale dwelling units and a 2.5 net acre neighborhood public park, based on the findings of DBMC Sections 21.20.080, 22.22.150, 22.48.040, and 22.38.110, subject to conditions of approval as listed within the draft resolution; OR 2 Direct the applicant to revise plans to include covering the channel with landscape improvements and continue the item to a specified date to allow the applicant additional time to submit revised plans and studies. Upon submittal of the required information, staff will complete the environmental assessment associated with the impacts of covering the channel and prepare a revised resolution for Council's consideration; OR 3. Remand the project to the Planning Commission with specific direction from the City Council; or, 4. Deny the Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Development Review, and Tree Permit, specifically identifying the reasons the required findings of DBMC Sections 21.20.080, 22.22.150, 22.48.040, and 22.38.110 cannot be made Requested by: Community Development Department 8.2 Ratify City Council Committee Appointments and Adopt Resolution No. 2013 -XX: Confirming the Appointment of Specific Representatives to the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments. Recommended Action: Ratify and Adopt. Requested by: Mayor 9. COUNCIL SUB -COMMITTEE REPORTS AND MEETING ATTENDANCE REPORTS/COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS: December 17, 2013 PAGE 6 10. ADJOURNMENT: Agenda No. 6.1 MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DECEMBER 3, 2013 g[Ulpy CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Jack Tanaka called the Regular City Council meeting to order at 6:34 p.m. in the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Government Center Auditorium, 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: INVOCATION: Christ, gave the invocation. ROLL CALL: Everett and Mayor Tanaka. Absent: Mayor Pro Tem Everett led the Pledge of Allegiance. Pastor Jeanne Faveau-Sorvillo, United Church of Council Members Herrera, Tye, Mayor Pro Tem Council Member Chang was excused. Staff Present: James DeStefano, City Manager; David DeBerry, City Attorney; Ken Desforges, IS Director; David Liu, Public Works Director, Bob Rose, Community Services Director; Greg Gubman, Community Development Director; Dianna Honeywell, Finance Director; Ryan McLean, Assistant to the City Manager; Marsha Roa, Public Information Manager; Kimberly Young, Associate Engineer; Cecilia Arellano, Public Information Coordinator; Amy Haug, Human Resources Manager, Marsha Roa, Public Information Manager and Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk. POST ELECTION PROCEDURES: 1. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO, 2013-34: RECITING THE FACT OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD ON NOVEMBER 5, 2013 DECLARING THE RESULTS AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY LAW. CC/Cribbins reported that on November 5, 2013, the City of Diamond Bar held a General Municipal Election for three City Council vacancies. With the exception of the nomination of candidates, the County of Los Angeles Registrar Recorder County Clerks' Office administered all aspects of the election. On November 25, 2013, Registrar Recorder County Clerk Dean Logan certified the results confirming that Steve Tye, Ling -Ling Chang and Nancy A. Lyons were duly elected to serve four-year terms. With the adoption of Resolution No. 2013-34 the City Council will ratify the certified results by the County Clerk, complete the election process and allow for the newly elected council members to receive the oath of office. C/Herrera moved, MPT/Everett seconded, to Adopt Resolution No. 2013- 34. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Herrera, Tye, MPT/Everett, M/Tanaka NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Chang DECEMBER 3, 2013 PAGE 2 CITY COUNCIL ADMINISTRATION OF OATH OF OFFICE TO COUNCIL MEMBERS STEVE TYE AND NANCY A. LYONS. Patty Tye administered the Oath of Office to Council Member elect Steve Tye. Dr. David Hall, Mt. SAC Trustee, administered the Oath of Office to Council Member elect Nancy A. Lyons. PRESENTATIONS TO OUTGOING COUNCIL MEMBER RON EVERETT: Presentations of Certificates were given to Mr. Everett by the following representatives: Cecilia Hong, representing Congressman Ed Royce Jody Roberto representing State Senator Bob Huff Ed Graham representing Assemblyman Curt Hagman Dickie Simmons representing Supervisor Don Knabe City of Walnut Council Members Nancy Tragarz and Bob Pacheco City of Chino Hills Mayor Ed Graham and Council Member Peter Rogers. Captain Scroggin on behalf of Sheriff Baca, the Diamond Bar/Walnut Station and the LA County Sheriff's Department Chief Stone and Leticia Pacillas on behalf of Chief Osby the LA County Fire Department Mayor Tanaka and Council Members presented a City Tile and gift. MPT/Everett thanked the City Council and stated that it had been a pleasure to serve the citizens of Diamond Bar alongside CM/ DeStefano and City staff as well as the Fire and Sheriff's Departments. CITY COUNCIL REORGANIZATION: 1. SELECTION OF MAYOR M/Tanaka opened nominations for Mayor. C/Tye nominated C/Herrera. With no other nominations offered by acclamation, C/Herrera was declared Mayor. 2. SELECTION OF MAYOR PRO TEM M/Herrera opened nominations for Mayor Pro Tem. C/Lyons nominated C/Tye. With no other nominations offered by acclamation, C/Tye was declared Mayor Pro Tem. DECEMBER 3, 2013 PAGE 3 CITY COUNCIL 3. PRESENTATION TO OUTGOING MAYOR JACK TANAKA M/Herrera presented a ceremonial gavel to outgoing Mayor Jack Tanaka and thanked him for his service. RECESS: M/Herrera recessed the City Council meeting at 7:08 p.m. RECONVENE: M/Herrera reconvened the City Council meeting at 7:32 p.m. 4. PRESENTATIONS TO OUTGOING MAYOR JACK TANAKA - by the following representatives: Jody Roberto representing Senator Bob Huff's Office Dickie Simmons representing Supervisor Knabe's Office Chief Stone, representing Chief Osby and the LA County Fire Department Captain Scroggin, representing Sheriff Baca and the LA County Sheriff's Office APPROVAL OF AGENDA: As Presented. 1. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATES, PROCLAMATIONS: 1.1 Presentation of Certificates of Recognition to Krystal Spindler, Editor, and Kirsten Khoury, Layout and Graphic Design, for their outstanding job with The Windmill magazine. (Continued to December 17, 2013) 2. CITY MANAGER REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: CM/DeStefano stated that it had been a great pleasure for him and City staff to work with Council Member, former Mayor Pro Tem and Mayor Ron Everett during the past seven years and wished him great success as he pursues future endeavors. Staff looks forward to working with new Council Member Nancy Lyons on a wide variety of projects and initiatives going forward. CM/DeStefano announced that the DB4Youth in Action is coordinating a "Stomp Out Hunger" food drive and that beginning December 3 and continuing through December 19 residents can drop off non-perishable canned goods in marked boxes at the Diamond Bar City Hall lobby and at the Diamond Bar Center. After December 19 all of the food items will be donated to a local Diamond Bar charity. For information, please contact City Hall at 909-839-7000. DECEMBER 3, 2013 PAGE 4 CITY COUNCIL 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Surendra Mehta, stated that it is wonderful to see the City grow and have so many amenities, especially parks and recreation programs. The Diamond Bar Center is wonderful and provides a great opportunity for seniors to conduct meetings. He congratulated Mayor Herrera and Mayor Pro Tem Tye, outgoing Mayor Tanaka and welcomed Nancy Lyons as the new Council Member. He thanked the City for having wonderful programs and for the opportunity to teach Yoga at the Diamond Bar Center and looks forward to many more opportunities for contributing to the City. Ryan Farsai congratulated M/Herrera and MPT/Tye on their appointments. He and his family own the ARCO AMPM of Diamond Bar, 3302 S. Diamond Bar Boulevard at Brea Canyon since 1992. He thanked Council and staff and especially CDD/Gubman, SP/Lee, the LA County Sheriff's Department and Planning Commission for their continued support of small business owners. On October 21 the station obtained its Alcoholic Beverage Control license and by the end of October the station was selling spirits. About 10 days ago the retrofit to the sales counter was completed and invited everyone to visit the station. The Diamond Bar store is the first AMPM in Los Angeles County to have fine spirits added to its offering. Sushma Kashyap, said she also owns a property at 3839 Castle Rock Road and was concerned about the lack of safety in Diamond Bar and recounted an armed robbery incident that took place about six weeks ago on Gold Run as she was driving home at about 2:40 p.m. and almost being hit by a school bus. Mrs. Kashyap also reported that there is drug and sexual activities that take place in front of their Castle Rock property during daylight hours and as an educator, she is very concerned about the affect these activities are having on the neighborhood children. Pui-Ching Ho, Diamond Bar Acting Librarian, invited children ages 2-11 to decorate their own holiday trees at the library on Saturday, December 7 at 10:00 a.m. and again at 11:00 a.m. Seating is limited and those interested in attending should sign up at the Children's Reference Desk. On Wednesday, December 11 at 4:00 p.m. there will be a special holiday magic extravaganza for children of all ages. On Wednesday, December 18 at 3:00 p.m. teens can make their own holiday stockings using fabric paints with all supplies provided by the library. Annemarie Branks, Miss Diamond Bar 2013, and Princesses Chika Udengwu, Danielle Ritchie, and Serena Avila -Mott, on behalf of Miss Diamond Bar Pageant Board and Court wished everyone a wonderful holiday season, congratulated the City Council on their election, thanked Ron Everett for his service on the City Council, outgoing Mayor Tanaka for being so visible in the City, and announced that the Miss Diamond Bar Pageant will be celebrating its 50th year in 2014. Applications are now being accepted for the 2014 pageant. Contestants can DECEMBER 3, 2013 PAGE 5 CITY COUNCIL apply online at www.missdiamondbarpacieant.om. Jack Shah, congratulated the City Council on its elections and congratulated Carol Herrera on her 5th term as Mayor. On behalf of the Sunshine Seniors he thanked the City Council Members for their service to the City and to its residents. The actions of the City Council make the residents proud and the City prosperous. Diamond Bar has grown and over time has proved that even during bad economic times the City has prospered and not created any debt which shows how well the Council and staff work together for the good of the City. The Sunshine Seniors thank the City for allowing them to use the City's facility. Staff always offers excellent support to the seniors. Allen Wilson congratulated Steve Tye and Nancy Lyons and thanked Council Member Tanaka for his service to the community during the past year. He also thanked outgoing Council Member Ron Everett for his dedication to the community and his independent thinking. He offered a correction to Page 1 of the November 19th minutes and wanted to know about the status of the former Ralph's Center because he is hearing mixed messages about whether a Walmart Neighborhood Supermarket is or is not moving in. Carolyn Carrao, representing Waste Management thanked residents for allowing her company to serve the community. She reminded everyone that the carts residents put out at the curb each week belong to Waste Management and that if there is damage to call and have them replaced free of charge. She also encouraged everyone to recycle. Additional recycling and green waste containers are available at no charge. She announced that during the week prior to and after Christmas old throw -away items will be picked up at no additional charge. Appliances, computers, televisions, etc. are not recycled but can be put out at the curb for collection at no additional charge. For service call 1-800-266- 7551. Diamond Bar High School students Dean Sakataudent and Emily Kay proposed a project for the Council's consideration that they said would save hundreds of thousands of City dollars while creating a greener environment and atmosphere for residents. The proposed project aims to replace sodium street lamp light bulbs with Electroless Induction Lamp bulbs for an up to 60 percent savings in energy cost with a bulb that lasts seven years longer than a traditional bulb and provides little or no emissions to the environment. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC COMMENTS: CM/DeStefano stated that he would coordinate with the Sheriff's Department and Walnut Valley Unified School District to learn more about the circumstances surrounding the event witnessed by Mrs. Kashyap and report back to the City Council. DECEMBER 3, 2013 PAGE 6 CITY COUNCIL CM/DeStefano stated that Mr. Wilson requested a correction to the minutes which he will offer to the Council during Consent Calendar presentation. In addition, he asked about the status of the vacant Ralph's space. Walmart continues to have a significant interest in the space but has not submitted any plans as of this date. CM/DeStefano stated that with respect to the vacancies in the Ralph's Shopping Center, the second vacancy is located closer to the restaurant row that exists on the north end of the center. The space that was previously occupied by Boston Store and various banks is a space that is being looked at by a national fitness center. Staff has a meeting with the owner of the shopping center later this week and these will be additional topics of conversation. 4. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: 5.1 Holiday Diamond Ride — November 29, 2013 through Wednesday, January 1, 2014 — Free shuttle services to and from Diamond Bar Shopping Centers — 18 years and older. 5.2 Candy Cane Craft Fair — December 7, 2013 — 9:00 to 2:00 p.m., Diamond Bar Community Center— 1600 Grand Avenue. 5.3 Planning Commission Meeting — December 10, 2013 — 7:00 p.m., Windmill Community Room, 21810 Copley Drive. (Canceled) 5.4 Traffic and Transportation Commission Meeting — December 12, 2013 — 7:00 p.m., Windmill Community Room, 21810 Copley Drive. 5.5 Special Planning Commission Meeting — December 19, 2013 — 7:00 p.m., Windmill Community Room, 21810 Copley Drive. 5.6 2013 Holiday Home Decorating Contest — Entry forms must be received no later than Friday, December 13, 2013 at 4:30 p.m.; judging Wednesday, December 18, 2013 — 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. Three categories — Best Holiday Spirit, Best Use of Theme, and Most Innovative. Residents may enter more than one category. 5.7 City Council Meeting — December 17, 2013 — 6:30 p.m., SCAQMD/Government Center Auditorium, 21865 Copley Drive. 5.8 Christmas Holiday — City Offices closed December 24 and 25, 2013 in observance of the Christmas Holiday. City offices reopen Thursday, December 26, 2013 at 7:30 a.m. 5.9 Planning Commission Meeting — December 24, 2013 — 7:00 p.m., Windmill Community Room, 21810 Copley Drive. (Canceled) DECEMBER 3, 2013 PAGE 7 CITY COUNCIL 5.10 Holiday Tree Curbside Collection Program — December 26, 2013 through January 10, 2014. Trees free of stands, decorations and flocking may be left at the curb for free pickup during this period. Any tree over 6 feet must be cut in half. 5.11 Late Night Transit Pass Sale — Thursday, December 26, 2013 — until 7:00 p.m., Diamond Bar City Hall, 21810 Copley Drive. 5.12 Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting — December 26, 2013 — 7:00 p.m., Windmill Community Room, 21810 Copley Drive. (Canceled). 5.13 New Year's Holiday — January 1, 2014 — City Offices closed Wednesday, January 1, 2014 in observance of the New Year's Day. City Offices reopen Thursday, January 2, 2014. 6. CONSENT CALENDAR: MPT/Tye moved, C/Tanaka seconded, to approve the Consent Calendar as presented. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Lyons, Tanaka, MPT/Tye, M/Herrera NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Chang 6.1 APPROVED CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — Regular Meeting of November 19, 2013 - As corrected (C/Lyons abstained). 6.2 RECEIVED AND FILED PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES — Regular Meeting of September 26, 2013. 6.3 RECEIVED AND FILED TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MINUTES — Regular Meeting of October 10, 2013. 6.4 RATIFIED CHECK REGISTER — Dated November 14, 2013 through November 27, 2013 totaling $1,673,684.76. 6.5 APPROVED TREASURER'S STATEMENT — for October 2013 and Revised Treasurer's Statements of June, July, August and September 2013. 6.6 APPROVED APPLICATION TO BE RECERTIFIED AS A TREE CITY USA FOR 2013 (12TH YEAR) AND AUTHORIZED THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE APPLICATION. 6.7 APPROVED CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 4 WITH KOA CORPORATION FOR ON-CALL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES IN THE AMOUNT OF $20,000. DECEMBER 3, 2013 PAGE 8 CITY COUNCIL 6.8 APPROVED NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE RESIDENTIAL AREA 1B (BOUNDED BY SR57/60 TO THE NORTH; GRAND AVENUE/DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD TO THE SOUTH; AND, THE NEIGHBORHOOD SURROUNDING QUAIL SUMMIT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL) AND ARTERIAL ZONE 7 (GOLDEN SPRINGS DRIVE BETWEEN LAVENDER DRIVE AND BREA CANYON ROAD, AND DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD BETWEEN BREA CANYON CUTOFF AND BREA CANYON ROAD) ROAD MAINTENANCE PROJECT. 7. PUBLIC HEARING: None 8. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: 8.1 WILLOW HEIGHTS: VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 72295; DEVELOPMENT REVIEW; AND, TREE PERMIT (PLANNING CASE NO. PL 2013-229). (Continued from November 19, 2013) CM/DeStefano reported that since the last Council meeting and request for additional information regarding the feasibility of covering the flood channel, staff contacted the Los Angeles County Flood Control District to review projects wherein channel coverings and restructuring have taken place in some of the adjacent cities. The most beneficial information was from the City of Industry's recent project in helping staff understand the requirements of the County Flood Control, the issues associated with potentially covering the channel, and the costs and timing of the matter. Staff has provided a detailed report outlining all of the different issues and options before the City Council which are listed below as part of the recommended actions for this item. Late today, staff received an emailed letter from Lennar which requested that the City Council continue the matter to December 17 so that they can continue to look into the issues associated with covering the channel as well as, continue to discuss with staff the possibility of an alternative for the Councils consideration. Therefore, staff is now recommending that the City Council continue this matter to December 17 in order to await further information from Lennar and any additional information that may become available to staff. CM/DeStefano said that today he communicated with the Walnut Valley Unified School District Superintendent, Robert Taylor, who is aware of the status of the project and offered no opinion regarding the request. CM/DeStefano also recommended that the City Council open the item for public comments on this matter which may aid staff in the work it needs to pursue for the next meeting. DECEMBER 3, 2013 PAGE 9 CITY COUNCIL M/Herrera announced that because the City Council received extensive testimony on November 5 regarding this project, public comments will be limited to 3 minutes for each speaker this evening. John Jones, Ambushers Street and DBHS teacher said that he has had his students working on this project and when he mentioned the possibility of covering the flood channel a student came up to him with information which he passed along to C/Tanaka and asked that C/Tanaka share the information with his colleagues. In essence, anyone who takes Federal funds in Los Angeles County has to follow certain rules pertaining to covering a flood channel. There was a concern about the pedestrian bridge and possible liability to the City because children might fall off of the bridge and yet, pedestrian bridges appear in many places and do not seem to be a problem if designed correctly. Another problem mentioned by speakers was parking on nearby streets. He reminded the Council that this is a very small neighborhood park and that it more likely that this park would be used as a neighborhood park. However, if there is a parking problem on Castle Rock he would recommend time limits or parking permits. Traffic problems are caused mostly by out of town folks who use Diamond Bar as a detour off of the SR57. He personally uses Cold Spring Lane and has never seen a block long line up of cars coming out of that section onto Diamond Bar Boulevard. He cannot imagine that 182 homes will cause a traffic problem and he will personally enjoy the additional lanes at the corner of Diamond Bar Boulevard and Brea Canyon Road. Throughout the history of the City there have been those who wanted to keep open spaces but development of the high school, for example, has proven to be an advantage to the City. Vinod Kashyap, said that what CM/DeStefano did not tell the City Council was that at the last City Council meeting he gave every City Council member a copy of a judgment by the 6th District which clearly states that government bodies that lack authority to approve a project also lack authority to certify environmental documents. He reiterated his contention that the Planning Commission does not have the authority to approve the project but only to make recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes the decision. He read from the judgment and again said the Planning Commission's EIR ruling was improper. Greg Ogonowski, congratulated the City Council on the Council reorganization. He lives above the proposed development and has seen a lot of wildlife that claim residency on the site. There are cranes, bobcats, DECEMBER 3, 2013 PAGE 10 CITY COUNCIL raccoons and coyotes and was concerned that the wildlife needed a home. With respect to the trees, he understands that the Walnuts are endangered and that the Sycamore trees that will replace the Walnuts at a 3:1 are protected which is another issue that needs to be addressed. Robert LaBella, said he was concerned about the safety of his children because building new homes where he lives is unnecessary. He leaves his house at 5:00 a.m. and Diamond Bar Boulevard is so bottled up at that time it is a nightmare. The reason he moved to Diamond Bar was because it was rural country and WVUSD was the right place for his kids. Now that his kids are getting older and driving he is concerned about safety in and around the City. Ryan Farsai said his business is across the street from the proposed project and spoke in favor of Lennar Homes developing Site D. He agrees with MPT/Tye that the channel needs to be covered with landscape improvements because he believes a 20 foot drop presents a liability. He believes Lennar is an excellent home builder and that they will come up with an amended plan to resolve the issue and obtain the Council's approval. Site D presents a tremendous public and private opportunity and estimates that the project would bring $150-175 million in property values with additional revenues to the City and County. In addition, the money generated from the sale of this property and the project will go to benefit the kids of the School District. CM/DeStefano said he believed the issue that needed to be clarified is one that has been brought up at the last two meetings regarding the San Jose case that came down a few short weeks ago regarding an action that the courts ultimately determined was inappropriate by the San Jose City Planning Commission. What has been inferred by the speaker is that the Diamond Bar Planning Commission has made a similar determination whereby the Diamond Bar Planning Commission has approved the environmental document and if so, the speaker is indicating that it would be a violation as referenced by a San Jose case. That is a miss - application of the San Jose case and a misunderstanding of the process in Diamond Bar and fundamentally flawed. The Diamond Bar Planning Commission is, in these cases, an advisor to the City Council. The Diamond Bar Planning Commission first saw this project years ago when it was a raw piece of earth and there was consideration for a Specific Plan, an Environmental Impact Report, etc. to change it from its then land use to a project that could permit a project of up to 200 homes and a park and the amenities therein. At that time, the Planning Commission recommended approval to the City Council; the Planning Commission did not take final action. The Council took final action ending in February 2012 wherein the City Council, incorporating the Planning Commission's recommendation as well as, all of the public testimony and numerous public meetings, certified the Environmental Impact Report and approved DECEMBER 3, 2013 PAGE 11 CITY COUNCIL the package of "umbrella changes" to that land use category. The School District then utilized those changes to market the property and Lennar was the victor in the bidding war which greatly benefits the District with necessary resources once the project comes to a conclusion. Lennar has now processed the specific entitlements requesting 182 homes, specific details for the park, bridge and a variety of other amenities. That detail incorporated in architectural drawings, engineered drawings and an Environmental Addendum was brought before the Planning Commission and was recommended by the Planning Commission for the City Council's approval in October 2013. Now the matter is before the City Council and the City Council has a package of recommendations. This is a process in Diamond Bar that has been the process since the City incorporated. Matters such as this project are recommended by the City Planning Commission to the City Council for final decision-making authority. There are some matters for which the Planning Commission makes the final determination such as a new home in "The Country Estates" and elsewhere or a commercial fagade remodeling in the City subject to an appeal. C/Tanaka moved, MPT/Tye seconded, to continue Item 8.1 to December 17, 2013. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Lyons, Tanaka, MPT/Tye, M/Herrera NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Chang 8.2 APPROVE FOR FIRST READING ORDINANCE NO. 14 (2013): AMENDING DIVISION 5 OF CHAPTER 8.12 OF THE DIAMOND BAR MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO STANDARD URBAN STORM WATER MITIGATION PLAN (SUSMP) REQUIREMENTS BY IMPOSING RAINWATER LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT (LID) STRATEGIES ON PROJECTS THAT REQUIRE BUILDING, GRADING AND ENCROACHMENT PERMITS. AE/Young presented staff's report stating that on November 5, 2013 the Council adopted an ordinance amending Division 5 of Chapter 8.12 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) which eliminated the Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) provisions and replaced them with low -impact development provisions pursuant to the 2012 MS4 permit. The ordinance before the Council this evening proposes additional amendments to Division 5, Chapter 8.12 in order for the City to be in full compliance with the new Storm Water Permit and provides the City with the necessary authority to enforce the new requirements. DECEMBER 3, 2013 PAGE 12 CITY COUNCIL Specific changes necessary to be in compliance are found in Section 8.12.1670, Section 8.12.1680, Section 8.12.1690 and Section 8.12.1695. The modifications as presented in the draft ordinance with staff's report are simply needed to clarify definitions and requirements under the 2012 MS4 Permit. Also as a condition of the new permit, the City Attorney is required to submit a letter by December 15 to the Regional Board stating that the City has full legal authority to enforce the provisions of the new permit and by approving first reading of the ordinance tonight, the City Attorney will be able to provide the required letter to keep Diamond Bar in compliance with the new permit. Staff recommends that the City Council approve for first reading by title only, waive full reading of Ordinance No. 14(2013) of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar amending Division 5, Chapter 8.12 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code relating to Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan requirements by imposing rainwater low -impact development strategies on projects that require building, grading and encroachment permits. There was no one present who wished to speak on this item. C/Tye moved, C/Tanaka seconded, to approve for First Reading by Title Only, Waive Full Reading of Ordinance No. 14(2013) of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar amending Division 5, Chapter 8.12 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code relating to Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan requirements by imposing rainwater low -impact development strategies on projects that require building, grading and encroachment permits. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Lyons, Tanaka, MPT/Tye, M/Herrera NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Chang RECESS: M/Herrera recessed the City Council meeting to the Public Financing Authority at 8:42 p.m. RECONVENE: M/Herrera reconvened the City Council meeting at 8:46 p.m. 9. COUNCIL SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS AND MEETING ATTENDANCE REPORTS/COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS: C/Tanaka hoped that everyone had enjoyed Thanksgiving. On November 20 he attended the PUSD Board meeting as a Junior Fair Board Advisory Committee member for the LA County Fair and introduced the Junior Fair Board program to the School Board. One junior and one senior from each of the 17 local high schools are involved and a student from Pomona and a student from Village Academy high school spoke about the program and their experiences within the program. DECEMBER 3, 2013 PAGE 13 CITY COUNCIL On Saturday, November 23 he presented two workshops about the role of a mayor at the Future Business Leaders of America's Leadership Conference in Anaheim. On Monday, November 25 he spoke to third grade classes at Maple Hill Elementary School about city government and the role of a mayor and on Friday, November 22 he attended the Foothill Transit Industry Park & Ride structure dedication. C/Tanaka asked that tonight's meeting be adjourned in memory of Dr. Aziz Ansari, husband of former Council Member and Mayor Eileen Ansari. Dr. Ansari was a retired medical doctor, a retired colonel having served in the United States Army Reserves and long-time resident of Diamond Bar. C/Lyons thanked staff for completing the testing and preparing the SCAQMD Auditorium, refreshments, answering her questions, etc. She said she appreciates the honor of serving on the City Council and looks forward to working with staff and residents. MPT/Tye welcomed C/Lyons to the City Council. On Saturday he celebrated with friends in the Indian community at the Sunshine Seniors Association Diwali 2013 Celebration. He wished his Indian friends a Happy Saal Mubarak and congratulated Mayor Herrera on her fifth term as Mayor. M/Herrera congratulated newly sworn in Council Member Nancy Lyons and MPT/Tye and Council Member Chang. She said it will be her pleasure to work together this year and thanked her colleagues for electing her Mayor. It is a pleasure to serve the City as its Mayor for a fifth time. She stated that this coming year her focus on economic development, which is critical for the future good health of the City of Diamond Bar. She invited her colleagues to walk with her on this journey. It will be a lot of work and well worth the effort. Congratulations to all on this exciting day. ADJOURNMENT: With no further business to conduct, M/Herrera adjourned the Regular City Council Meeting at 8:52 p.m. in memory of Aziz Ansari. TOMMYE CRIBBINS, CITY CLERK The foregoing minutes are hereby approved this day of 2013. CAROL HERRERA, MAYOR - Agenda No. 6.2 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR MINUTES OF THE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION DIAMOND BAR CITY HALL - THE WINDMILL ROOM 21810 COPLEY DRIVE, DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 OCTOBER 24, 2013 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Dave Grundy called the Parks and Recreation Commission meeting to order at 7:01 p.m. in the City Hall Windmill Room, 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Vice Chairman Owens led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Lew Herndon, Benny Liang, Dave Roberto, Vice. Chairman Ted Owens, Chairman Dave Grundy Staff Present: Bob Rose, Community Services Director; Anthony Jordan, Parks and Maintenance Superintendent; Christy Murphey, Recreation Superintendent; Mickey McKitrick, Recreation Specialist, and Debbie Gonzales, Administrative Coordinator. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE: None Offered. CALENDAR OF EVENTS: As presented by CSD/Rose. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: C/Herndon moved, VC/Owens seconded, to approve the Consent Calendar as presented. Without objection, the motion was so ordered with C/Liang abstaining. 1.1 Regular Meeting Minutes for September 26, 2013 — approved as submitted. 2. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 2.1 Recreation Program Update — RS/Murphey VC/Owens asked if there are seniors who participate in more than one group and RS/Murphey responded that there are quite a few seniors who participate in more than one group. 2.1.1 Power Point Presentation on Field Attendants — RS/McKitrick Chair/Grundy asked if the City kept a portion of deposits if staff has to clean up after a scheduled park event. RS/Murphey said that staff turns in a form to the staff members who make the OCTOBER 24, 2013 PAGE 2 P&R COMMISSION reservations and a portion or all, of the deposit is retained, depending on how much work the Field Attendants have to do. In a recent incident, two Field Attendants spent about three hours cleaning up after a scheduled event, which definitely affected the deposit. VC/Owens asked if groups take advantage of the parks without scheduling. RS/McKitrick responded that it happens periodically; however, the bigger issue is that a regular group of individuals drive around looking for fields. Each time they are caught doing so, they are told they have to submit evidence of insurance and go through the proper channels to have field access. If user groups leave lights on and leave the field, adults will often come onto the fields for pickup soccer games. The lights automatically go off at 10:00 p.m. User groups are requested to let staff know if they intend to leave the field early, however, they do not always do so and staff will then discover that the lights have not been turned off when they conduct their rounds. 2.2 Parks Report — PMS/Jordan VC/Herndon said there was a previous discussion about placing bollards in parks to prevent vehicles from driving up to the picnic tables and wanted to know if staff had completed its investigation. PMS/Jordan responded that Pantera Park has removable bollards. Peterson Park is more open which would likely require something like white vinyl fencing to preclude access. To VC/Owens' question, no further mitigation measures have been investigated or considered. 2.2.1 Power Point Presentation on Dog Park Improvements — PMS/Jordan 2.3 Cl P Projects - CSD/Rose 2.3.2 Dog Park — CSD/Rose reported that Geronimo Concrete started work on October 7 and expects to be finished prior to Thanksgiving. 2.3.3 Grandview Trail and Grandview Trail Link — CSD/Rose stated that the revised plans were submitted by TKE.and have been approved by Building and Safety. Plans are now with the Public Works Department for approval of the grading plan and, once approved, the project will go out to bid. 2.3.4 Site D Public Park — CSD/Rose reported that the Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed the Conditions of Approval at its last meeting and those conditions were reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission on October 8. The Commission packet contains a memorandum listing the Conditions that were recommended for City Council approval on November 19. OCTOBER 24, 2013 PAGE 3 MR COADMSION Chair/Grundy asked if any of the Parks and Recreation Commission's recommended changes were eliminated or changed by the Planning Commission. CSD/Rose responded that the only condition that was tweaked was Condition No. 2, which had to do with the Building Permit and the time frame for completion of the park. 2.3.5 Diamond Bar Center Improvements — CSD/Rose stated that office doors are being installed by the contractor early next week. 2.4 List of Pending Commission Requests — CSD/Rose said that the non- binding MOU with the school districts would be added to the list of Commission requests. 3. OLD BUSINESS: 3.1 Pony Baseball Fields — CSD/Rose presented staff's report and stated that participation in the allocation, monitoring or payment for use by community organizations of the Pony Baseball fields presents too much risk to the City of Diamond Bar and recommended that the City pass on the opportunity. C/Roberto asked who conducts the risk assessment for the City and CSD/Rose responded the JPIA and management staff. C/Herndon read his response to CSD/Rose's email into the record. OGTOBER 24, 2013 PAGE 4 P&R COMMISSION Response to Interoffice Memorandum dated October 17, 2013 From: Bob Rose, Community Services Director Re: Pony Baseball Fields Liability to the city—the question that I ask is why is there more liability to the city on rented property than on city owned property or school district owned property. It appears to me that this is a failed argument. On school property the school district and the city are bath deep pockets. on city property the city is the only "deep pocket" involved. So to say thatthe city is the only deep pocket involved on rented property does not make a sensible argument in that it is already in that situation on its own property when it allows the youth sports programs to use cityfields.. In addition we have crowded onto one field both softball and soccer at this time. I have a greater fear of a liability problem with the current situation. Insurance—should the citygo forth with this plan of renting Pony League fields I am sure that all parties involved would carry appropriate insurance. I would assume that the Pony League carries insurance, I believe that the sports organizations are required to carry insurance as a prerequisite to using the city controlled fields and because the city is so concerned about their deep pockets.) am sure the city carries appropriate insurance. Benefits—We are told that 119 hours per field would be made available to the sports organizations through this program. I believe there are four fields at the Pony League complex. That means that 476 additional hours of field use would be made to the youth sports organizations. After sitting in on several Field Allocation Meetings I believe this additional time would be greatly appreciated by the sports groups and the city staff. One year trial — I believe that a three month trial of this arrangement is in order to test the results. The city has no direct casts as the Diamond Bar Community Foundation has agreed to pay the rental fees for the three months involved. If the program is a failure or is sufficiently flawed then it obvicuslyshould not be continued. However ifthe program successfully relieves congested sports fields duringthe critical months of Aug., Sept. and Oct. It should be renewed if at all possible. Respectf fly submitted, ✓� � ����-� �°/ 3/13 Lew Herndon, Parks and Recreation Commissioner He further stated that if there is a concern about whether the Diamond Bar Community Foundation will pay the money he is sure that the Foundation would make the money available to the City's treasury long before the program went into effect. Chair/Grundy said he was uncertain why the money would have to be available to the City because would not the Foundation pay the money directly? C/Herndon said he believed the Foundation would pay at the City's direction. Chair/Grundy said if the City was concerned about OCTOBER 24, 2013 PAGE 5 P&R entering into an agreement, an alternative would be to have the Foundation pay the rental without the City being directly involved and therefore, he believed there would be no liability issue. C/Herndon said that the problem with that scenario is that the Foundation has very limited personnel. There is no paid staff and everyone participates on a volunteer basis. There are a lot of programs the Foundation is involved in and it makes sense to him that these fields would be allocated through the City. CSD/Rose stated that the maintenance provided at the Pony Baseball fields is provided by Pony League volunteers or independent contractors under the control of Pony Baseball — they are not under the control of the City and the City does not want control over the maintenance because this is an ongoing obligation. One of the liability concerns is that the City has a contractor that is maintaining the parks, and with respect to the fields owned by the school district that the City allocates, the City is in charge of the maintenance. The Pony fields would be maintained under another entity which would present a liability concern. C/Herndon said that for most of the schools the City does not conduct any maintenance. CSD/Rose agreed and stated that the City does not allocate any other school fields except Paul C. Grow and Lorbeer Middle School, both of which are maintained by the City. C/Roberto asked if Pony League would agree that the City had no contractual responsibility for maintaining the fields. Pony has already said that it would continue to do the maintenance and the City would not have any responsibility for the maintenance. CSD/Rose explained that without controlling the maintenance, the City does not have control of the condition of the fields and if something were to occur as a result of the City allocating the facility, the City could be held liable and even though other insurance coverage is in force, the City could ultimately beheld liable for injuries. . C/Herndon asked how RS/McKitrick would use those fields if he had 476 additional hours to allocate during critical months. RS/McKitrick responded that he would be able to schedule baseball/softball teams to use the Pony fields, as the current situation leaves baseball/softball in a position to where coaches are unable to teach children how to track a fly ball. The possibility of being able to hit into the outfield would likely be greatly appreciated. Sophia Rice Gonzales asked if denial of the Pony League allocation would affect the Commission's endorsement of a new facility. C/Herndon said 'that use of the Pony fields during the three month period would not solve the City's field shortage problem. Jill Ferris said it would be great to play with an outfield. She felt the real liability issue was how congested the parks are becoming and thought it would be worth a try to use the Pony fields. OCTOBER 24, 2013 PAGE 6 P&R COMMISSION Greg Busch, 518 Navajo Springs has 24 years with AYSO and 13 years with Diamond Bar Girls Softball, said the Pony fields afford an opportunity to open other fields for the kids and when someone makes an offer to use an established facility it should be considered. The Commission and staff have always been very supportive of the community organizations and the City needs to continue that posture. Roger Pearce, 652 Blenfield Place, Upper Division Commissioner for AYSO in Diamond Bar, in response to whether or not RS/McKitrick could use another 476 hours for field .allocation, suggested that if RS/McKitrick and others were to contact the sports organizations a lot could. be accomplished. VC/Owens said he thought Pony League was in the process of scheduling the facility. C/Herndon said he spoke with the President of Pony League this evening before coming to the meeting and he was told they are willing to rent the facilities to the City on weekday afternoons, not on weekends and not on Holidays. However, he understood the big need was for practice fields and not for games. VC/Owens wondered why the City would want to get involved at all. He asked why the Pony League would not just continue to work with the user groups. C/Herndon said that it would be more cumbersome because for this to work, in his opinion, it needs a central control for allocating field time to the various groups. Chair/Grundy said it sounds to him like the heavily congested period of time is actually August through October and that time frame has passed this year. Is there any value to reconsidering this for Spring to position the groups for next year? C/Herndon said he was talking about next August to October (2014) which would give RS/McKitrick time to plan and discuss options with the organizations. This year there is nothing available that would benefit the organizations. Chair/Grundy said that given the time to consider alternatives he would suggest that the Commission ask the City to consider a three month trial for next August through October (2014) to see if there is any liability strategy for the three month period of time and determine how much value is provided- After the three month trial the City could consider whether there was enough value to enter into a more permanent arrangement and work to overcome the potential liability issues. C/Liang asked RS/McKitrick how long it would take for him to work with the user- groups to allocate the hours. RS/McKitrick responded that he sends paperwork to the user groups and they have a few weeks to turn in their field requests. A couple of weeks after that staff meet with the user groups which gives him about a month to prepare. With the increase in travel groups, new groups are also requesting field use. It usually takes another two weeks to map out the calendar. OCTOBER 24, 2013 PAGE 7 P&R COMMISSION C/Roberto agreed there was time to consider an arrangement for next year and felt it was important to continue to attempt to work it out. C/Herndon moved to recommend that the City move forward with the project if possible, and that staff and the City Council attempt to mitigate insurance liability concerns: Motion died for lack of a second. Chair/Grundy moved, VC/Owens seconded to recommend that this be sent back to staff for further study to determine whether the City can enter into an agreement and mitigate the liability issue. Motion passed 4-0 with C/Roberto abstaining. CSD/Rose. asked what the time period was on the Commission's recommendation. C/Herndon asked when RS/McKitrick needed the information and RS/McKitrick responded that he would like to have the information available by June 2014. 4. NEW BUSINESS: 4.1 Request to Study Funding Options for Athletic Facility Improvements - CSD/Rose presented staff's report and recommended that the Parks and Recreation Commission recommend that the City Council direct staff to examine all available and potential sources of funding for the implementation of the capital improvement plan in the Parks Master Plan including the future funding of construction and maintenance of athletic facility improvements. Chair/Grundy asked for confirmation that staffs recommendation does not contain a specific recommendation for use of the proceeds of the Site D property, which he received from CSD/Rose. C/Herndon read his response to the recommendation for Item 4.1 into the record: OCTOBER 24, 2013 PAGE 8 P&R CONDUSSION Response to Interoffice Memorandum dated October 17, 2013 From: Bob Rose, Community Services Director Re: Request to Study Funding Options for Athletic Facility Improvements Background: I agree with all of this information provided by Mr. Roses memorandum. 1 feel that there is additional information that is necessaryto consider. The shortage of lighted and unlighted sports fields in Diamond Bar is olderthan the city itself. The cityspent over $470,000 to consultants to provide us with the Parks and Recreation Master Plan and I think they did an outstandingjob. 1 agree with their acknowledgment that we have a shortage of sportsfields. Each and everyyearthousands of kids are involved in youth sports programs. Each and every yearthe city holds Field Allocation Meetings to parcel out the availablefields to all the sports organizations involved. Each and every year the city fathers turn a blind eye to this problem, or in fairness, they fail to consider to provide funding to alleviate the problem_ We need to move this problem way up on the priority list. A recent article in a local newspaper stated that only J. in 3 of the kids in our schools can pass the minimum requirements of the California Physical Fitness Test. In my estimation this is a great tragedy. At the same time we (the city) are not providing the necessary sports fields to accommodate the needs of the people that are trying to overcome this problem through their sports groups. In fact, it appears thatthis issue is a lower priority than providing a place for dogs to exercise. I like animals butthey do not come before our children on my list of priorities. Discussion — I again agree with Mr. Rose's statement that "the Park and Recreation Commis -;ter is asking the City Council to consider the development of additional lighted athletic facilitiee when establishing priorities for future funding." I believe though that the onetime funds (approx. $1.8 M) being generated by the sale of the city property adjacent to Site D should be devoted solely to the overlooked and decades old problem of sports fields. We need $5 M to solve the sports fields problem so there will be a need for future funding and we should be looking for the source for those funds. Mr. Rose states, "The City Council is certain to consider numerous options for the use of these one-time funds"_ That is the problem, they have a' history of always considering other options for aff funds. On -Going Maintenance Costs - Yes the economy has been weak and yes it is improving. In fact, a recent article in the local paper tells us that average property value tax assessment in the are: has increased 4.7%this last year. This should produce additional funds for the city. Certainly far in excess of the $62,000 needed for additional maintenance and operations mentioned at L.orbeer Middle School. I have also made an appeal to the Walnut Valley Unified School Board of Trustees to consider using some of their funds from the sale of Site D.to help solve the shortage of fields. They are also concerned about their student's health and availability of after OCTOBER 24, 2013 PAGE 9 P&R COABUSSION school sports programs. I have subsequently had one on one conversations with several of the trustees and they have encouraged me to pursue this issue with the district. Approximately a year ago the Parks and Recreation Commission recommended to the City Council that the city staff negotiate a Memorandum of Understanding with the two school districts in Diamond Bar regarding the possible joint use of district property as suggested in the P & R Master Plan. There has been a change of leadership at WVUSD so that project was delayed. I have spoken to the new superintendent, Dr. Taylor, and I think now is the time to follow through with the City Council's direction to put the MQU in place. Respectfully submitted, J J Lew Herndon, Parks and Recreation Commissioner OCTOBER 24, 2013 PAGE 10 P&R COADUSSION C/Herndon further commented that Upgrading the. Lorbeer Middle School field would cost $1.5 million and if the City gets $1.8 million from the sale of Site D that leaves $300,000 to cover the maintenance for that property for five years which would give the City time to improve its financial. situation. Jill Ferris, Publicity Chair, Diamond Bar Girls Softball, and volunteer advocate for the American Heart Association, talked. about the need for more sports facilities in the City and asked the Commission to recommend to the City Council that it set aside $1.8 million from the sale of the property adjacent to Site D for that purpose. She presented a petition with 300 plus signatures in support of the proposed recommendation. Tom Balderama, 1502 Strawflower Lane, President, FC Man. United, said he agreed with speakers that the biggest challenge to the City is lack of fields. It is very difficult to train on a 15' x 20' piece of grass. He said he supported the request to study funding options for athletic facility improvements. His organization is seeking funding from Cal South Foundation that looks to cities for capital improvement plans on a matching funds basis. He recommended that the Commission consider potential funding from Cal South Foundation. Chair/Grundy asked if the funds would have to be dedicated to soccer or could they be used toward field improvements. Mr. Balderama said he believed the funds could be used toward field improvements; however, The Foundation is obviously looking to develop soccer fields and he felt that strong usage of fields for softball and soccer could be of interest to The Foundation: Mr. Balderama said he would provide staff with a contact name. Mr. Busch said that Walnut Valley Unified School District has taken AYSO for tens of thousands of dollars and he would like to see the funds go to a school district that is supportive of youth athletics such as the Pomona Unified School District which never charges for use of fields for athletics. Mrs. Ferris asked what else the money could be used for in addition to lighting facilities. CSD/Rose responded that the only other project he is aware of at this time is an update of the General Plan which he understands will cost the City $2 million. Mrs. Ferris asked if the main concern about using the money was "maintenance" and CSD/Rose explained that money is always a concern whether it is building or maintaining a facility. Mrs. Ferris thought the user fees paid for ongoing maintenance. CSD/Rose explained that the City of Diamond Bar does not charge for use of its athletic facilities or for the lighting. Staff has asked the City Council to consider charging fees for field use, but the City Council has chosen not to charge user fees for athletic fields. OCTOBER 24, 2013 PAGE It P&R COMnIISSION C/Herndon reminded the Commission that over 1,700 people have signed the petition asking the City to use the :Site D proceeds for sports fields. He asked CSD/Rose if he was aware of any other item that had received more than 1,700 signatures and CSD/Rose said he was aware of one other time when the City incorporated. Chair/Grundy said he would agree to include a reference to the $1.8 million to the effect that the City use part or all of the $1.8 for future athletic facilities. He acknowledged C/Herndon's desire to recommend that all of the $1.8 million be used for athletic fields, and his only concern about that was that if the recommendation left no wiggle room and was not palatable to the City Council, it may negate the original intent, as opposed to saying the Commission would like to have it all but that the Commission is willing to settle for at least part of the proceeds, should that be the will of the Council. C/Roberto agreed with Chair/Grundy and believes the City has to be fiscally responsible in determining the best use of funds. If some of the money could be set aside for improvement on some of the sports complexes the City currently uses, it should be done. VC/Owens agreed with C/Roberto that the opportunity to use some of the funds from the sale of Site D for some of the Master Plan items such as Lorbeer would open a lot of opportunities for sports fields, especially if they are lighted fields that can be used during the day, into the evening and on weekends. C/Herndon said that this issue has not been addressed for a number of years and he is concerned that unless something specific is decided he cannot imagine the City moving forward with athletic fields. $1.8 million would allow everything in the Parks Master Plan to be done for Lorbeer as well as provide five years of maintenance for that facility. C/Liang asked how South Point Middle School fields could be lighted with so many homes adjacent to the school. There was an issue of neighbors concerned with the use of fields at Maple Hill School even during the daylight hours. CSD/Rose said that anytime lights are installed on a ball field there are concerns about potential issues with the residents. The City had the issue with Peterson Park and also at Pantera Park. In fact, Pantera Park is still in the midst of mitigation. Most of the lighted fields are open until 10:00 p.m. and at Pantera, unless there is a game in process that extends beyond that hour, the lights are on only until 9:00 p.m. The outreach process would include working with neighbors to mitigate their concerns, which .is always balanced against the benefit to the entire community. The lights do not spill over into the neighborhood;, however, the neighbors can see the lights, which to some is an issue. OCTOBER 24, 2013 - PAGE 12 P&R COMMISSION C/Liang asked what would happen if the $1.8 million was set aside for Lorbeer and during the outreach process the City ran into problems and by the time the issues were resolved, $1.8 million might not be enough. CSD/Rose said it was always a possibility an outreach process might take longer than anticipated and there is never a guarantee that the outcome will be favorable. The last time the City went through the Lorbeer process it was a pretty smooth process with no outcry from the community; however, another field that is located closer to homes could certainly lengthen the public process. Chair/Grundy called for a vote on staffs recommendation which was rejected by a 5-0 vote. Chair/Grundy asked for a vote on a revised recommendation that included the following: "that the proceeds of $1.8 million from the sale of Site D will be used for future funding of athletic fields" which failed by a voice vote of 1 Aye and 4 No votes. Chair/Grundy asked for a vote on a second revision of staff's recommendation to include the following: "that part or all of the $1.8 million proceeds from the sale of Site D should be included in the future funding and construction of athletic fields.' C/Herndon asked for a specific minimum amount to be included. Chair/Roberto asked the Commission to comment on what a minimum threshold should be and C/Herndon suggested 50 percent. C/Liang asked if the City Council had to accept the Commission's recommendation and CSD/Rose responded "no." Chair/Grundy asked for a vote on a third revision of staffs recommendation to include the following revision: "that at least half up to all of the $1.8 million proceeds from the sale of Site D will be used for future construction of athletic fields." Without objection, the motion was so ordered. C/Herndon said the school districts have not been approached about a joint use agreement and the districts are in the dark about the Parks Master Plan. The (non-binding) MOU would clear up that issue and ensure their cooperation and agreement when.funding becomes available. If the City Council grants the Commission's request it may not bode well with the school district if the City suddenly told the district what it intended to do with the district's land. The (non-binding) MOU clearly states what the City would like the school district to know and seeks their cooperation when funding becomes available. CSD/Rose explained that when Agenda Item 2.4 was discussed this evening the non-binding MOU was added back onto the list and staff will OCTOBER 24, 2013 PAGE 13 P&R COMAUSSION move forward with the item. VC/Owens thought that when the Master Plan was developed the two school districtsbought into that plan during the development process. CSD/Rose said that the school boards did not officially vote on whether to support it or approve it. The non-binding MOU is actually a communication between the City Council and school boards. C/Herndon moved to direct staff to resume activity on the Memorandum of Understanding with Walnut Valley Unified School District and Pomona Unified School District regarding the possible joint use.of district property as suggested in the Parks Master Plan. Without objection, the motion was so ordered. 5. ANNOUNCEMENTS: C/Roberto thanked staff for the Power Point presentations and the work they do. He asked that a list of the current and future projected expenditures for the Dog Park to be included in the Commission's meeting agenda. C/Herndon thanked his colleagues for their presence and staff for the outstanding job they do. He asked for a report from RS/McKitrick on the field allocation meetings. He does not want staff to feel that any of his comments this evening were directed at them. • His motivation is strictly to help the kids in the City and it was not his intention to offend anyone. C/Liang thanked staff for their informative presentations. He appreciated the thoughtful discussion by his colleagues and the ability for each Commissioner to feel free to express his concerns. He thanked the user group participants who spoke this evening. VC/Owens thanked.staff for the Power Point presentations. He advised staff he will attend the Veterans event. He thanked the user group individuals who were present this evening. Chair/Grundy thanked staff for the great reports and for doing such a great job day in and day out as witnessed by how well the City's facilities are maintained. He thought tonight's discussion was great and wished for more public input during Commission meetings. OCTOBER 24, 2013 PAGE 14 P&R COMMISSION ADJOURNMENT: C/Herndon moved, VC/Owens seconded, to adjourn the Parks and Recreation Commission meeting. With no one objecting and no further business before the Parks and Recreation Commission, Chair/Grundy adjourned the meeting at 9:10 p.m. The foregoing minutes are hereby approved this26 day of NOVEMBER 2013. Agenda No. 6.3(a) MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 22, 2013 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Torng called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Windmill Room, 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Commissioner Dhingra led the Pledge of Allegiance. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Ashok Dhingra, Jimmy Lin, Jack Shah, Vice Chairman Frank Farago, ChairmanTony Torng Also present: Grace Lee, Senior Planner; James Eggart, Assistant City Attorney; Natalie Tobon, Assistant Planner, and Stella Marquez, Administrative Coordinator. 2. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: None offered. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: As presented 4. CONSENT CALENDAR: 4.1 Minutes of the October 8, 2013, Regular Meeting. C/Dhingra moved, Chair/Torng seconded, to approve the October 8, 2013, regular meeting minutes as amended and corrected. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote:. AYES: NOES: ABSENT 5. OLD BUSINESS: 6. NEW BUSINESS COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: None None 7. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING(S):. Dhingra, Lin, Shah, VC/ Farago, Chair/Torng None None 7.1 Development Review No. PL2013-77 — Under the authority of Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.48, applicant Steven Phillips and property owner Mei Deng, requested Development Review approval to construct a MM ! new single-family residence consisting of 13,360 square feet of livable area; a 2,207 square foot garage, and 2,471 square feet of patio areas on a 1.21 gross acre (52,707 square foot) lot. The subject property is zoned Rural Residential (RR) with a consistent underlying General Plan land use designation of Rural Residential. (Continued from October 8, 2013) PROJECT ADDRESS: PROPERTY OWNER: 24074 Falcons View Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Mei Deng 500-999 West Broadway Vancouver, BC VSZIKS APPLICANT: Steven Phillips 23177 La Cadena Drive #101 Laguna Hills, CA 92677 AP/Tobon presented staff's report and recommended Planning Commission approval of Development Review No. PL2013-77, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. C/Shah suggested that staff's response to public comment number 3 should include a statement that the retaining wall is strong enough to protect the neighbor's swimming pool from possible discharge of additional load impacts. AP/Tobon responded that staff's response includes the statement that "structural plans for all proposed structures including retaining walls will be submitted to the Building and Safety Division during building plan check for compliance with the California Building Code" which will include specifications for the retaining walls to ensure that it will not impact the neighbors property. SP/Lee also added that any grading and foundation design methods will follow the requirements contained in the geotechnical report. C/Dhingra said that the square footage shown in item 1 of the resolution does not match Sheet A-1 of the plans (13,360). SP/Lee responded that staff will make the appropriate changes to the resolution. C/Lin asked for clarification of the landscape plans and AP/Tobon pointed out that C/Lin's concern involved a change that the architect wanted to show on the plan. SP/Lee reiterated that landscape plans will be reviewed during landscape plan check for the final design and irrigation. OCTOBER 22, 2013 , PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION C/Lin asked if the lot was connected to sewer or septic. AP/Tobon responded that that this home is on septic. C/Lin said he did not see the septic tank on the plans and AP/Tobon explained that this is not submitted during the planning phase of the project, it is submitted during the grading plan and building plan check process when.the construction drawings are submitted to staff. C/Lin said that in the past the Commission has been provided drawings that identified the location of the septic tank. SP/Lee reiterated it is a condition of approval that the homeowner submits a plan showing the location of the septic tank system. C/Lin again stated that because the lot slopes down at the rear of the property the homeowner has to identify an appropriate place for location of the septic tank. AP/Tobon referred C/Lin to the applicant's civil engineer. Chair/Torng opened the public hearing. Steven Phillips, architect, said it has been a long journey to get to this point. He first worked with The Country Estates homeowners association and was surprised to learn they had three licensed architects who volunteer their time to the board. One is the Dean of Architecture at Cal Poly Pomona. The Board advised him that there was an illegal fill that was placed from the neighboring site to the north of the project site and he was asked to solve the design problem in a manner consistent with the natural grades that were there prior to the illegal fill. The project's civil engineer who will answer the questions on the location of the septic system was able to locate the original topographic maps which were used to design the home. When the house was designed the first floor was placed in relationship to the southern portion of the property so that when looking at the front elevation there was a jog in it so the front door is more or less even with or a little below the street level at the southern side of the property which makes it approximately six feet lower than the neighboring property to the north. Currently, the site is flat, even with the property to the north on at least six feet of illegal fill. The Country Estates homeowners association wanted to be sure that the project designed a solution to keep the first floor of the house six feet below the northerly property. In addition, another 14 feet was cut out for a daylight basement to lower the house and balance the site with the grading. The site will be buttressed for stability. The homeowners association approved the site plan and in working with staff, various elements of the house were adjusted to bring everything into conformance including the in and out driveway. Once the site plan was adjusted, the landscaping was revised to eliminate the in and out driveway because there is a question as to ownership of the roadway and the 12 -foot parkway. He spoke with the • : 1.- • k. board members who believe they control the road parkway; however, the applicant agreed to the City's condition. He thanked staff and especially AP/Tobon for their work on this project. Hank Jong, EGL Civil Engineers, said that with respect to the Commission's question regarding the location of the septic tank, typically, the system is not shown on the conceptual grading plan because at this stage, no percolation tests have been done and the number of seepage pits needed for this house is not yet known. However, he believes the pits can be placed at the front of the house under the driveway so the maintenance vehicle will have access. He,said he did not foresee a problem providing a septic system sufficient to serve the house. With respect to geotechnical issues, he will recommend that the house be supported by caissons which are placed firmly into bedrock to make sure nothing will move in the future. C/Shah asked if the house has been designed using caissons or is it just a recommendation. Mr. Jong said he had done many houses on hillsides within The Country Estates and he always recommends that these types of houses built on hillsides be supported by caissons, placed firmly into bedrock. The applicant has to follow his recommendations. C/Lin said he differed with the civil engineer on the septic tank issue. If the pit is going to be at the front of the house and there is a basement floor more than 12 feet below the front, the pit would have to be 20 feet into the ground. Mr. Jong said that typically, a 50 foot ground water hole is drilled to make sure the ground water is at least 10 feet below the pit, after which 40 foot test holes are drilled to ensure the 40 foot seepage pit. The pipe will be directed from the rear of the house to the front of the house for service accessibility and the pit will be serviced every six months or so. C/Dhingra asked Mr. Phillips which condition of approval he was referring to regarding The Country Estates jurisdiction over the roadway and parkway. Mr. Phillips responded that The Country Estates has an easement that is owned by the homeowners association that states that roadways and parkways are for the enjoyment of all and they believe they are responsible. There is no space between a portion of the subject property and the private street easement at the front of the property. C/Dhingra said from Mr. Phillips testimony that he thought there was a conflict with respect to a specific condition. Mr. Phillips further explained that the condition was that since there was a potential conflict regarding jurisdiction and responsibility for the private street easement between the HOA and the City, staff recommended that the project abandon the in and OCTOBER 22, 2013 PAGE 5 PLANNING COMMISSION out driveway at this time. Mr. Phillips said he agreed with staff and proceeded to remove the in and out driveway. Michael Liu, 2160 Indian Creek, said he submitted a letter to staff and the Commission to express his concerns about the design of the house including the amount of fill done by previous owners. He is concerned about the foundation of his house and the safety of his property including his swimming pool and was concerned that trees might fall on his property. He was also concerned about the location of the septic tank being too close to his house. He asked the City for assurance that his property would be protected. Carol Gass, 23830 Falcons View Drive, said she was surprised that someone would be allowed to build such a large house on a small property and wanted to know how many bedrooms and bathrooms would be included in the house and how many individuals would reside in the home. She asked when construction would start and how long it would take to complete the house. Mr. Phillips responded to the speaker that a house of this nature would likely take 24 months to construct and it is not likely that once started construction would stop. The house will be highly engineered on caissons and will not move. The house has four bedrooms on the upper floor, one on the main floor and one in the basement for a total of six bedrooms. He would be happy to go over the plans with the neighbors. SP/Lee reiterated that with respect to the first speaker's concerns, grading, foundation design, retaining walls and landscape installation such as tree species and root barriers will all be reviewed during plan check and if there are any problems encountered at that time, they will be addressed. The plan check process will ensure that the project is designed to not cause structural or slope instability on the subject and/or neighboring properties. VC/Farago asked Mr. Phillips to point out the distance between the existing house to the north and the proposed house which appears to him to be about 48 or 49 feet and about 33 or 34 feet to the property line. Mr. Phillips said that the retaining wall will be about 10 feet away from the property line. VC/Farrago assured the neighbor that there is considerable distance between the two homes and asked Mr. Phillips to show the neighbor where the retaining wall is proposed in proximity to the neighbor's pool. Mr. Phillips said the distance between the proposed house and the house to the south is approximately 50 feet. AP/Tobon said the aerial photograph does not show the neighbor's swimming pool r •'FAMPAgr 1' I because the pool was built this year, after the photos were taken. SP/Lee stated that the Code requires swimming pools to be located a minimum of five feet from the property line. The property owner pojnted out the location of his swimming pool. C/Dhingra said he believed the neighbor's concerns would be addressed during plan check. Chair/Torng closed the public hearing. C/Shah moved, VC/Farago seconded, approve Development Review No. PL2013-77, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Dhingra, Lin, Shah, VC/ Farago, Chair/Torng NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None PUBLIC HEARING(S): 8.1 Development Review No. PL2013-147 — Under the authority of Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.48, the applicant/property owner Dr. Umesh Shah requested Development Review approval to construct a 2,828 square foot two-story addition to an existing two-story single family residence on a 0.47 gross acre (20,607 square foot) lot. The subject property is zoned Low Medium Density Residential (RLM) with an underlying General Plan land use designation of Low Density Residential. PROJECT ADDRESS: PROPERTY OWNER/ APPLICANT: 21955 Birds Eye Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Dr. Umesh Shah 21955 Birds Eye Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 SP/Lee stated that due to staff's error, the public hearing notice published for this item was defective, therefore, a revised public hearing notice will need to be published and mailed to surrounding property owners before the Commission can hear this matter. Due to staff's error, the City and not the applicant will incur costs associated with re -noticing the item as well as, future planning reviews. Staff recommends that the Commission continue this matter to November 12, 2013. OCTOBER 22, 2013 PAGE 7 PLANNING COMMISSION 9. PLANNING COMMISSIONER COMMENTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 10. STAFF COMMENTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 9.1 Public Hearing dates for future projects. SP/Lee stated that the November 12 agenda will consist of two projects, both of which are continued projects. One is an addition to a single family home in The Country Estates located at 23223 Ridgeline Road, which was continued from the September 24, 2013, meeting in order to allow the property owner to consider removing the rear pad from the rear yard in order to save the protected trees; and the other is the Birds Eye project which was scheduled for tonight's meeting. The Willow Heights project on Site D is scheduled for the November 19, 2013, City Council meeting. 10. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: As listed in tonight's agenda. ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Planning Commission, Chairman Torng adjourned the regular meeting at 7:46 p.m. The foregoing minutes are hereby approved this 12th day of November, 2013. Attest: Respectfully Submitted, Greg Gubman Community Development Director Tonyl-r�'Chairman % -` Agenda No. 6.3(b) MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 12, 2013 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Torng called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Windmill Room, 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Vice Chairman Farago led the Pledge of Allegiance. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Ashok Dhingra, Jimmy Lin, Jack Shah, Vice Chairman Frank Farago, Chairman Tony Torng Also present: Greg Gubman, Community Development Director; Grace Lee, Senior Planner; Natalie Tobon, Assistant Planner; and Stella Marquez, Administrative Coordinator. 2. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: None Offered. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: As presented 4. CONSENT CALENDAR: 4.1 Minutes of the October 22 2013 Regular Meeting C/Dhingra moved, VC/Farago seconded, to approve the October 22, 2013, regular meeting minutes as presented. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Dhingra, Lin, Shah, VC/ Farago, Chair/Torng NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None 5. OLD BUSINESS: None 6. NEW BUSINESS: None 7. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING(S): 7.1 Development Review No. PL2012-475 — Under the authority of Diamond Bar Municipal Code Sections 22.48, applicant Jack Wu and property owner Justin Chien requested Development Review approval to construct NOVEMBER 12, 2013 PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION a 573 square -foot second floor addition to an existing single family residence on a 1.6 gross acre (69,696 square -foot) lot. The subject property is zoned Rural Residential (RR) with a consistent underlying General Plan land use designation of Rural Residential. On August 27, 2013 the matter was continued by the Planning Commission to give the property owner the opportunity to consider removing the proposed rear pad. PROJECT ADDRESS: PROPERTY OWNER: 23223 Ridge Line Road Diamond Bar. CA 91765 Justin Chien 2880 Woodbridge Court Diamond Bar, CA 91765 APPLICANT: Jack Wu 10410 Lower Azusa Road #3203 EI Monte, CA 91731 AP/Tobon presented staff's report and recommended Planning Commission approval of Development Review No. PL2012-475, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. Jack Wu said that the owner agreed with C/Shah's recommendation to remove the pad from the proposal and save the three trees. Chair/Torng opened the public hearing. With no one present who wished to speak on this item, Chair/Torng closed the public hearing. VC/Farago moved, C/Dhingra seconded, to approve Development Review No. PL2012-475, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Dhingra, Lin, Shah, VC/ Farago, Chair/Torng NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None NOVEMBER 12, 2013 8. PUBLIC HEARING(S): PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION 8.1 Development Review No. PL2013-147 — Under the authority of Diamond Bar Municipal Code Sections 22.48 and 22.56, the applicant/property owner Dr. Umesh Shah requested Development Review approval to construct a 2,828 square -foot two-story addition to an existing two-story single family residence on a 0.47 gross acre (20,607 square -foot) lot. A Minor Conditional Use Permit was requested for the continuance of a non- conforming distance of 13'-6" to the structure on the adjacent lot to the west. The subject property is zoned Low Medium Density Residential. PROJECT ADDRESS: PROPERTY OWNER/ APPLICANT: 21955 Birds Eye Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Dr. Umesh Shah 21955 Birds Eye Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 AP/Tobon presented staff's report and recommended Planning Commission approval of Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL2013-147, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. C/Shah asked why the issue of 13'-6" versus 15' is being brought forward for this application. AP/Tobon explained that the matter has been brought forward because it is a non -conforming distance separation to the neighboring residence and does not comply with the current development standards. CDD/Gubman said that even if it was there before, if an expansion is proposed that is more than 50 percent of the existing, it automatically requires a Minor Conditional Use Permit and associated findings to allow for a continuation of the non -conformity. If the addition is less than 50 percent and is an addition to the first floor only the applicant can continue the non -conforming setback without a Minor Conditional Use Permit. C/Shah asked if the,Minor Conditional Use Permit included the landscaping and AP/Tobon explained that that the landscaping is a Condition of Approval. C/Lin asked what the wide building was outside of the property at the northwest corner. CDD/Gubman responded that it is a deck on the adjacent property which has a code enforcement issue because it encroaches onto the greenbelt area that is part of the Gateway Corporate Center's open space common area. C/Lin asked if a drainage report was submitted as part of this application and CDD/Gubman said that it would not have been part of the Development Review application. SP/Lee NOVEMBER 12, 2013 PAGE 4 PLANNING COMMISSION 10 explained that the Public Works Department is requiring a detailed drainage system information during plan check and staff will make certain that all drainage and runoff will be conveyed from the site to a natural drainage course, which is a Condition of Approval. C/Dhingra said that Condition 4 and 22 are the same and the second part of Condition 6 is not clear. SP/Lee said the Conditions would be clarified with the Building staff prior to finalizing the resolution. Chair/Torng opened the public hearing. Sonia Shah, 915 W. Las Palmas Drive, Fullerton, CA 92835, representing applicant Dr. Shah, said she looked forward to approval of the project. She thanked staff for their support and guidance through the process. She reviewed the Conditions of Approval with staff and the applicant, who concurs with all of the conditions. With no one further wishing to speak on this matter, Chair/Torng closed the public hearing. C/Shah moved, C/Dhingra seconded, to approve Development Review and Minor Conditional Use Permit No. PL2013-147, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Dhingra, Lin, Shah, VC/ Farago, Chair/Torng NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None PLANNING COMMISSIONER COMMENTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: C/Dhingra congratulated Chair/Torng for being elected to the Walnut Valley Unified School District Governing Board. C/Shah and VC/Farago congratulated Chair/Torng as well. Chair/Torng thanked his colleagues for their support during a hard fought battle. STAFF COMMENTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 10.1 Public Hearing dates for future projects. CDD/Gubman congratulated Chair/Torng on his election to the Walnut Valley Unified School District Governing Board. NOVEMBER 12, 2013 PAGE 5 PLANNING COMMISSION CDD/Gubman stated that the only item on the agenda for November 26, 2013, is the Housing Element update for the 5th Cycle Housing Element which requires adoption by the City Council and State certification by the middle of February 2014. Staff will present the Draft Housing Element update to the Commission and present the document to state HCD for its 60 -day review. Once conditional certification is received, staff will present fhe'-docurnent to City Council for adoption of the Resolution that will be forwarded to the State to keep Diamond Bar in good standing in terms of General Plan conformity until 2021. C/Shah asked for an update on the Ralph's location. CDD/Gubman responded that there will be a new major national grocery chain which should be open by the middle of 2014. 11, SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: As listed in tonight's agenda. ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Planning Commission, Chairman Torng adjourned the regular meeting at 7:28 p.m. The foregoing minutes are hereby approved this 26th day of November, 2013. Attest: Respectfully Submiittttteed,, Greg Gubman Community Development Director rng, Chairn a CITY COUNCIL Agenda 9 6 _ q _ Meeting Date: December 17, 2013 AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: James DeStefano, City Man g TITLE: Ratification of Check Register dat d November 28, 2013 through December 11, 2013 totaling $ 455,518.75 RECOMMENDATION: Ratify. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Expenditure of $ 455,518.75 in City funds. BACKGROUND: The City has established the policy of issuing accounts payable checks on a weekly basis with City Council ratification at the next scheduled City Council meeting. DISCUSSION: The attached check register containing checks dated November 28, 2013 through December 11, 2013 for $ 455,518.75 is being presented for ratification. All payments have been made in compliance with the City's purchasing policies and procedures. Payments have been reviewed and approved by the appropriate departmental staff and the attached Affidavit affirms that the check register has been audited and deemed accurate by the Finance Director. PREPARED BY: Luisa Allen Accounting Technician REVIEWED BY: Finance Director Attachments: Affidavit and Check Register— 11/28/13 through 12/11/13. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR CHECK REGISTER AFFIDAVIT The attached listings of demands, invoices, and claims in the form of a check register including checks dated November 27, 2013 through December 11, 2013 has been audited and is certified as accurate. Payments have been allowed from the following funds in these amounts: Description Amount General Fund $399,422.37 Prop A - Transit Fund $5,742.23 Prop C - Transit Tax Fund $6,268.88 Integrated Waste Mgt Fund $13,967.76 Comm Dev Block Grand Fund $609.46 LLAD 38 Fund $12,605.44 LLAD 39 Fund $12,076.47 LLAD 41 Fund $4,826.14 $455,518.75 Signed: &Zt& L. Dianna Honeywell Finance Director City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 11/28/2013 thru 12/11/2013 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct # Amount Total Check Amount Check Date Check Date 12/5/2013 106125 ADVANTEC CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC PROF. SVCS -PR 2013-901 001 23012 280.00 $700.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 REIMB-SUPPLIES ADVANTEC CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC ADMIN FEES -PR 2013-901 001 23012 50.40 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 ADVANTEC CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC ADMIN FEES -PR 2013-901 001 34650 -50.40 106128 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 42125 ADVANTEC CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC PROF SVCS -PR 2013-1438 001 23012 420.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 ADVANTEC CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC ADMIN FEES -PR 2013-1438 001 23012 75,60 FACILITY REFUND -DBC 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 $449.00 12/5/2013 ADVANTEC CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC ADMIN FEES -PR 2013-1438 001 34650 -75.60 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 106126 ANAHEIM GLASS INC GLASS INSTALL -DBC 0015333 42210 530.00 $630.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 ROBYN A BECKWITH PLANT SVCS -PARKS 0015340 42210 387.33 12/5/2013 106127 ANDREA D TARAZON REIMB-SUPPLIES 0015350 1 41200 1 163.49 $163,49112/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 ROBYN A BECKWITH PLANT MAINT-LIBRARY 0014093 42210 12/5/2013 106128 AT&T MOBILITY CELL CHRGS-CMGR 0014030 42125 37.96 $37.96 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 106129 ROBYNA BECKWITH PLANT SVCS -DBC 0015333 45300 397.72 $1,413.70 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 ROBYN A BECKWITH PLANT SVCS -PARKS 0015340 42210 387.33 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 CONTRACT CLASS -FALL ROBYN A BECKWITH PLANT MAINT-CITY HALL 0014093 42210 270.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 ROBYN A BECKWITH PLANT MAINT-LIBRARY 0014093 42210 107.00 106132 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 23002 ROBYN A BECKWITH MISC PLANTS -CITY HALL 0014093 42210 251.65 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 1 106130 BENESYST 12/06/13-P/R DEDUCTIONS 001 21105 866.69 $866.69112/5 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 DH MAINTENANCE MAINT-DBC 0015333 45300 12,250.83 12/5/2013 106131 JOHN E BISHOP CONTRACT CLASS -FALL 0015350 45320 154.80 $154.80 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 106132 BRUCE BULLER FACILITY REFUND-REAGAN 001 23002 50D0 $50.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 1 ERON FACILITY REFUND -DBC 001 1 23002 449.00 $449.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 1 106134 CALIFORNIA COMMERCIAL LIGHTING SPPL SUPPLIES -DBC 0015333 1 41200 77.83 $77.83 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 1 106135 CM SCHOOL SUPPLY CO SUPPLIES -TINY TOTS 0015350 1 41200 246.69 $246.69 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 106136 CPRS DISTRICT XIII MTGS-REC STAFF 0015310 42325 180.00 $180.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 1 106137 DAVID J. GRUNDY P & R COMM-NOV 21 0015350 1 44100 45.00 $45.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 1 106138 ROSA DE LEON FACILITY REFUND -DBC 001 23002 1 500.00 $500.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 106139 DH MAINTENANCE MAINT-CITY HALL/LIBRARY 0014093 42210 6,500.00 $20,586.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 DH MAINTENANCE MAINT-DBC 0015333 45300 12,250.83 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 Page 1 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 11/28/2013 thru 12/11/2013 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct # I Amount I Total Check Amount Check Date Check Date 12/5/2013 106139... DH MAINTENANCE MAINT-PARKS 0015340 42210 735.17 $20,586.00... 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 DH MAINTENANCE ADDL MAINT-DBC 0015333 45300 600.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 001 DH MAINTENANCE ADDL MAINT-CITY HALL 0014093 42210 500.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 106140 DIAMOND BAR MOBIL FUEL -COMM SVC 0015310 42200 190.54 5190.54 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 106141 DOGGIE WALK BAGS INC SUPPLIES -PARKS 0015340 1 41200 1,090.00 $1,090.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 EMERALD LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC ADDL MAINT-CITY HALL 0014093 42210 185.00 12/5/2013 106142 SHARON ELLIS FACILITY REFUND-PANTERA 001 23002 1 50.00 $50.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 106143 EMERALD LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC LANDSCAPE MAINT-DEC 13 0014093 42210 840.00 $1,965.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 FUN EXPRESS EMERALD LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC ADDL MAINT-CITY HALL 0014093 42210 620.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 EMERALD LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC ADDL MAINT-CITY HALL 0014093 42210 185.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 EMERALD LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC ADDL MAINT-CITY HALL 0014093 42210 320.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 106144 EXCEL LANDSCAPE - LANDSCAPE MAINT-PARK 0015340 45300 325.00 $28,592.29 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 FUN EXPRESS EXCEL LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE MAINT-DIST 38 1385538 45500 11,718.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 EXCEL LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE MAINT-DIST 39 1395539 45500 11 610.95 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 EXCELLANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE MAINT-DIST 41 1415541 45500 4,143.87 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 EXCEL LANDSCAPE ADDL MAINT-PARK 0015340 42210 126.62 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 EXCEL LANDSCAPE ADDL MAINT-DIST 38 1385538 42210 253.07 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 EXCEL LANDSCAPE ADDL MAINT-DIST 41 1415541 42210 414.78 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 106145 EXTERIOR PRODUCTS INC HOLIDAY BANNERS -COMM SVCS 0015310 1 44000 1 5,860.00 $5,860.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 106146 FUN EXPRESS SUPPLIES -COMM SVCS - 0015350 41200 342.24 $342.24 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 106149 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. PROF.SVCS-EN 07-582 001 23012 374.00 $47,879.17 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. ADMIN FEES -EN 08-605 001 23012 109.35 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. ADMIN FEES -EN 08-605 001 34650 -109.35 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. PROF.SVCS-PR 2012-2163 001 23012 26.60 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. PROFSVCS-PR 2013-1626 001 23012 574.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. ADMIN FEES -PR 2013-1626 001 23012 103.32 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. ADMIN FEES -PR 2013-1626 001 34650 -103.32 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. PROF.SVCS-PR 2013-1626 001 23012 287.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. ADMIN FEES -PR 2013-1626 001 23012 51.66 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. ADMIN FEES -PR 2013-1626 001 34650 -51.66 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 Page 2 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 11/28/2013 thru 12/11/2013 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct # Amount Total Check Amount CheCK Date Check Dale 12/5/2013 106149... HALL&FOREMAN, INC. PROFSVCS-PR 2013-1687 001 23012 1,155.31 $47,879.17..12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. ADMIN FEES -PR 2013-1687 001 23012 207.96 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. ADMIN FEES -PR 2013-1687 001 34650 -207.96 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. PROF.SVCS-PR 2013-1687 001 23012 1,155.31 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. ADMIN FEES -PR 2013-1687 001 23012 207.96 - 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. ADMIN FEES -PR 2013-1687 001 34650 -207.96 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. PROFSVCS-PR 2013-934 001 23012 1,14048 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. ADMIN FEES -PR 2013-934 001 23012 205.28 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. ADMIN FEES -PR 2013-934 001 34650 -205.28 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL&FOREMAN, INC. PROFSVCS-PR 2012-2070 001 23012 1,012.50 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. ADMIN FEES -PR 2012-2070 001 23012 182.25 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. ADMIN FEES -PR 2012-2070 001 34650 -182.25 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. PROF.SVCS-PR 2012-2070 001 23012 202.50 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. ADMIN FEES -PR 2012-2070 001 23012 36,45 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. ADMIN FEES -PR 2012-2070 001 34650 -36.45 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. PROFSVCS-EN 07-582 001 23012 405.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. ADMIN FEES -EN 07-582 001 23012 72.90 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. ADMIN FEES -EN 07-582 001 34650 -72.90 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. PROF.SVCS-STORM DRAIN REV 0015510 R45227 2,468.87 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. PROFSVCS-INSPECTIONS 0015510 45227 1,144.29 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. PROFSVCS-INSPECTIONS 0015510 45227 77.06 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. PROF.SVCS-PLAN CHECK 0015551 45223 2,552.25 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. PROF.SVCS-ST IMPR REV 0015551 45223 8,810.24 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. PROF.SVCS-SEWER REV 0015551 45223 1,640,00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. PROFSVCS-STORM DRAIN REV 0015551 45223 2,665.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL& FOREMAN, INC. PROFSVCS-PLAN CHECK 0015551 45223 183.09 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. PROF.SVCS-PLAN CHECK 0015551 45223 49.19 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. PROESVCS-PLAN CHECK 0015551 45223 343.61 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. PROF.SVCS-INSPECTIONS 0015510 45227 641.25 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. PROF.SVCS-INSPECTIONS 0015510 45227 277.15 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. PROF.SVCS-PLAN CHECK 0015551 45223 860.85 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. PROF.SVCS-PLAN CHECK 0015551 45223 4,108.24 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. PROESVCS-PLAN CHECK 0015551 45223 1,965.50 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 - HALL & FOREMAN, INC. PROF.SVCS-PLAN CHECK 0015551 452236,511.13 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. ADMIN FEES -EN 07-582 001 23012 67.32 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 Page 3 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 11/28/2013 thru 12/11/2013 Check Dale Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Accl # Amount Total Check Amount Check Date Check Date 12/5/2013 106149... HALL & FOREMAN, INC. ADMIN FEES -EN 07-582 001 34650 -67.32 $47,879.17 ... 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 P & R COMM 11121 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. PROESVCS-PR 2012-2163 001 23012 135.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. ADMIN FEES -PR 2012-2163 001 23012 24.30 106152 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 1 44000 1 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. ADMIN FEES -PR 2012-2163 001 34650 -2430 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. PROF SVCS -PR 2012-2163 001 23012 115,00 MTGS-V/PATROL DINNER 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 $1,370.19 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. ADMIN FEES -PR 2012-2163 001 23012 20.70 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. ADMIN FEES -PR 2012-2163 001 34650 -2070 1 36615 1 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. PROF.SVCS-PR 2012-2070 001 23012 230.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 106155 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. ADMIN FEES -PR 2012-2070 001 23012 41.40 $995.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. ADMIN FEES -PR 2012-2070 001 34650 -41 40 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 LEGISLATIVE SVCS -DEC 13 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. PROFSVCS-PR 2012-2070 001 23012 2,733.75 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. ADMIN FEES -PR 2012-2070 001 23012 492.08 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. ADMIN FEES -PR 2012-2070 001 34650 -492.08 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC PROF.SVCS-PR 2012-2070 001 23012 1,316.25 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. ADMIN FEES -PR 2012-2070 001 23012 236.93 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. ADMIN FEES -PR 2012-2070 001 34650 -236.93 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. PROF.SVCS-EN 07-560 001 23012 1,383.75 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. ADMIN FEES -EN 07-560 001 23012 249.08 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. ADMIN FEES -EN 07-560 001 34650 -249.08 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. PROESVCS-EN 07-560 001 23010 727.50 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. ADMIN FEE -EN 07-560 001 23012 130.95 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. ADMIN FEE -EN 07-560 001 34650 -130.95 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 HALL & FOREMAN, INC. PROESVCS-EN 08-605 001 23012 607.50 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 1 106150 SHIRLEY HELMER SUPPLIES -CITY HALL 0014093 1 41200 1 43.10 $43.10 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 1 106151 LEW HERNDON P & R COMM 11121 0015350 1 44100 1 45.00 $45.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 1 106152 DEREKALLEN HO PROF.SVCS-HISTORICAL PROJ 0014095 1 44000 1 3,986.84 $3,986.84 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 106153 IHORNBLOWER CRUISES & EVENTS MTGS-V/PATROL DINNER 0014415 1 42325 1 1,370.19 $1,370.19 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 1 106154 CHRISTOPHER HUNT FACILITY REFUND -DBC 001 1 36615 1 400.00 5400.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 106155 INLAND EMPIRE MAGAZINE AD -DBC DEC 0014095 1 42115 1 995.00 $995.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 106156 JOEA. GONSALVES & SON INC. LEGISLATIVE SVCS -DEC 13 0014030 1 44000 1 0 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 Page 4 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 11/28/2013 thru 12/11/2013 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct # Amount Total CheckAmount Check Date Check Daft 12/5/2013 1 106156... JOEA. GONSALVES & SON INC. QUARTERLY FILING FEE 0014030 44000 45.00 $3,045.00... 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 1 106157 GABRIELA KLEIN CONTRACT CLASS -FALL 0015350 45320 540.00 $540.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 LEIGHTON &ASSOCIATES, INC. ADMIN FEES -EN 08-624 001 23012 80.46 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 1 106158 PETER KO RECREATION REFUND 001 34740 1 5.00 $5.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 106159 LEIGHTON &ASSOCIATES, INC. PROESVCS-EN 08-624 001 23012 447.00 $745.50 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 LEIGHTON &ASSOCIATES, INC. ADMIN FEES -EN 08-624 001 23012 80.46 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 LEGAL SVCS-H/R LEIGHTON &ASSOCIATES, INC. ADMIN FEES -EN 08-624 001 34650 -80.46 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 LEIGHTON &ASSOCIATES, INC. PROESVCS-PR 2012-2070 001 23012 298.50 106162 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 21115 1 LEIGHTON &ASSOCIATES, INC. ADMIN FEES -PR 2012-2070 001 23012 53.73 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 LEIGHTON &ASSOCIATES, INC. ADMIN FEES -PR 2012-2070 001 34650 -53.73 FACILITY REFUND -DBC 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 106160 VICTOR LEON FACILITY REFUND -DBC 001 36615 400.00 $400.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 DENISE MCCREARY FACILITY REFUND -DBC 001 36615 298.20 12/5/2013 106161 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE LEGAL SVCS-H/R 0014020 1 44021 1 3,165.00 $3,165,00112/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 OFFICEMAX INC SUPPLIES-H/R 0014060 41200 12/5/2013 106162 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK DEC 2013 -EAP PREMIUMS 001 21115 1 154.44 $154.44 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 106163 DENISE MCCREARY FACILITY REFUND -DBC 001 23002 650.00 $948.20 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 DENISE MCCREARY FACILITY REFUND -DBC 001 36615 298.20 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 1 106164 MIRACLE RECREATION EQUIPMENT COMPAN SLIDE EQ-REAGAN PARK 0015340 1 42210 1 1,851,25 $1,851.25 12/5/2013 12/S/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 OFFICEMAX INC SUPPLIES-H/R 0014060 41200 97.04 12/5/2013 1 106165 MOBILE RELAYASSOCIATES INC REPEATER SVCS -DEC 2013 0014440 1 42130 1 78.75 $78.75 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 OFFICEMAX INC SUPPLIES-H/R 0014060 41200 12/5/2013 1061fifi FERNANDO MODESTO FACILITY REFUND -HERITAGE 001 23002 1 200.00 $200.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 41200 486.14 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 106167 MAY MORRIS FACILITY REFUND -DBC 001 23002 1 100.00 $100.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 106168 MY WEDDING.COM AD -DBC 0014095 1 42115 1,660.00 $1,660.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 106169 NEAD LLC APP MONTHLY MAINT-NOV/DEC 0014095 44000 237.00 $237.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 106170 OFFICEMAX INC SUPPLIES-CMGR 0014030 41200 236.71 $1,49251 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 OFFICEMAX INC SUPPLIES-H/R 0014060 41200 97.04 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 121512013 OFFICEMAX INC SUPPLIES-H/R 0014060 41200 74.92 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 OFFICEMAX INC SUPPLIES-H/R 0014060 41200 9,56 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 OFFICEMAX INC SUPPLIES -GENERAL 0014090 41200 486.14 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 Page 5 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 11/28/2013 thru 12/11/2013 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept I Acct # Amount L Total Check Amount Check Date Check Date 12/5/2013 106170... OFFICEMAX INC SUPPLIES -GENERAL 0014090 41200 256.66 $1,492.51 .- 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 P R & COMM -NN 21 OFFICEMAX INC SUPPLIES-P/WORKS 0015510 41200 288,76 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 OFFICEMAX INC SUPPLIES-P/WORKS 0015510 41200 42.72 106176 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 106171 ONWARD ENGINEERING PROFSVCS-PR 2012-605 001 23012 1 160.00 $160.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 106183 PERS RETIREMENT FUND RETIRE CONTRIB-(PEPRA) 001 21109 257.56 $680.15 12/5/2013 106172 TED OWENS P R & COMM -NN 21 0015350 1 44100 1 45.00 $45.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 106173 PERS RETIREMENT FUND SURVIVOR BENEFIT 001 21109 45.57 513,363.08 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 106183 PERS RETIREMENT FUND RETIRE CONTRIB-(PEPRA) 001 21109 257.56 $680.15 112/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 PRINT SVCS -ST SWEEPING PERS RETIREMENT FUND RETIRE CONTRIB-EE 001 21109 13,059.95 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 1 106174 DEANNAPRADA FACILITY REFUND-SYC CYN 001 23002 1 50.00 $50.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 106183 SASAKI TRANSPORTATION SVCS INC ADMIN FEES -PR 2013-1493 001 23012 222.46 $680.15 12/5/2013 1 106175 PROMO DIRECT.COM PRINT SVCS -ST SWEEPING 1155515 1 42110 1 001 0 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS -PARKS 0015340 42126 12/5/2013 106176 QUINN RENTAL SERVICES EQ RENTAL -CITY HALL 0014093 1 42210 1 1,102.55 $1,102.55 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 42126 50.25 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 106177 IRMARINCON RECREATION REFUND 001 34720 1 25.00 $25.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 106178 DAVID A ROBERTO P&RCOMM-NOV21 0015350 44100 45,001 $45.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 106179 ROSS CREATIONS SOUND SYS -WINTER SNOW FST 0015350 45300 250.00 $250.00 12/5/2013 1121512013 12/5/2013 106180 RUTH SANDECKI FACILNY REFUND-PANTERA 001 23002 50.00 $50.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 106181 SASAKITRANSPORTATIONSVCS INC PROF.SVCS-PR 2013-1493 001 23012 1,236.00 $1,236.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 106183 SASAKI TRANSPORTATION SVCS INC ADMIN FEES -PR 2013-1493 001 23012 222.46 $680.15 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 SASAKI TRANSPORTATION SVCS INC ADMIN FEES -PR 2013-1493 001 34650 -222.48 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 106182 JERRYL LYNN SHORT CONTRACT CLASS -FALL 0015350 1 45320 1,134.00 $1,134.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 1 106183 SILVER STATE TRAILWAYS TRANS-V/PATROL RECOG 0014415 42325 680.15 $680.15 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 106184 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAEDISON ELECTSVCS-DIST41 1415541 42126 26249 $5,532.69 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 SOUTHERNCALIFORNIAEDISON ELECT SVCS -DIST 38 1385538 42126 584.12 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS -DIST 39 1395539 42126 465.52 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS -PARKS 0015340 42126 4,165.31 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS -DIST 38 1385538 42126 50.25 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 Page 6 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 11/28/2013 thru 12/11/2013 12/5/2013 106191 VANTAGEPOINTTRNSFRAGNTS-303248 11/22/13 -LOAN DEDUCTIONS 001 21108 2,256.68 $29,896.08 12/5/2013 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct # Amount I Total Check Amount Check Date Check Date 12/5/2013 106185 GLENN STEINBRINK CONSULTANT SVCS -WK 10/24 0014050 44000 325.00 $325.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 001 1 21107 T 1,309.55 $1,309.55 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 PROFSVCS-PR 2013-1779 001 23012 12/5/2013 106186 SOUAD TADROS FACILLY REFUND -DBC 001 23002 350.00 $350.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 106187 THE SAUCE CREATIVE SERVICES SIGNS -CRAFT FAIR 0015350 45300 134.00 $134.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 106188 TIME WARNER CABLE MODEM SVCS -COUNCIL 0014010 1 42130 1 60.98 560.98 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 1 106189 US BANK CITY CREDIT CARD-NOV 2013 0014050 1 44000 1 25,722.85 $25,722.85 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 106190 VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE MAINT INC ADDL MAINT-SYC CYN 0015340 1 42210 1 1,861.90 $1,861.90 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 106191 VANTAGEPOINTTRNSFRAGNTS-303248 11/22/13 -LOAN DEDUCTIONS 001 21108 2,256.68 $29,896.08 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 VANTAGEPOI 4TTRNSFRAGNTS-303248 11/22/13-P/R DEDUCTIONS 001 21108 27,639.40 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 1 106192 VIDIFLO LLC MAINT-DBC EQ MAINT-P/INFO 0014095 1 45000 1 325.00 $325.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 W.W. GRAINGER INC. MAINT-DBC 0015333 42210 86.66 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 1 106193 VISION SERVICE PLAN DEC 2013 -VISION PREMIUMS 001 1 21107 T 1,309.55 $1,309.55 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 106194 W W GRAINGER INC. MAINT-DBC 0015333 42210 173.96 $260.62 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 W.W. GRAINGER INC. MAINT-DBC 0015333 42210 86.66 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 10fi195 WALNUT VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST FACILITY RENTAL-OCT/NOV 0015350 42140 945.00 $8,872.50 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 WALNUT VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST FACILITY RENTAL-OCT/NOV 0015350 42140 3,192.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 WALNUT VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST FACILITY RENTAL-OCT/NOV 0015350 42140 4,735.50 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 106196 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY SUPPLIES -CITY HALL 0014093 41200 669.67 $1,698.58 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY SUPPLIES -DBC 0015333 41200 1,028.91 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 106197 WEST COASTARBORISTS INC TREE MAINT-NOV 2013 0015558 45509 4,301.70 $5,000.70 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC TREE MAINT-NOV 2013 0015558 45510 699.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 106198 DANIEL WESTON CONTRACT CLASS -FALL 0015350 1 45320 1 68.40 $68.40 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 106199 WILLDAN GEOTECHNICAL PROF.SVCS-PR 2013-1687 001 23012 1,552.50 $7,130.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 WILLDAN GEOTECHNICAL ADMIN FEES -PR 2013-1687 001 23012 279.45 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 WILLDAN GEOTECHNICAL ADMIN FEES -PR 2013-1687 001 34650 -279.45 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 WILLDAN GEOTECHNICAL PROFSVCS-PR 2013-1779 001 23012 2,145.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 Page 7 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 11/28/2013 thru 12/11/2013 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct # Amount Total Check Amount Check Date Check Date 12/5/2013 106199... WILLDAN GEOTECHNICAL ADMIN FEES -PR 2013-1779 001 23012 386.10 57,130.00... 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 106201 WILLDAN GEOTECHNICAL ADMIN FEES -PR 2013-1779 001 34650 -386.10 $11,565.00112/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 WILLDAN GEOTECHNICAL PROESVCS-PR 2013-622 001 23012 740.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 WILLDAN GEOTECHNICAL ADMIN FEES -PR 2013-622 001 23012 133,20 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 WILLDAN GEOTECHNICAL ADMIN FEES -PR 2013-622 001 34650 -133.20 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 WILLDAN GEOTECHNICAL PROFSVCS-PR 2013-880 001 23012 370.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 WILLDAN GEOTECHNICAL ADMIN FEES -PR 2013-880 001 23012 66.60 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 WILLDAN GEOTECHNICAL ADMIN FEES -PR 2013-880 001 34650 -66.60 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 WILLDAN GEOTECHNICAL PROF.SVCS-PR 2013-880 001 23012 705.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 WILLDAN GEOTECHNICAL ADMIN FEES -PR 2013-880 001 23012 126.90 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 WILLDAN GEOTECHNICAL ADMIN FEES -PR 2013-880 001 34650 -126.90 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 WILLDAN GEOTECHNICAL PROFSVCS-PR 2013-1250 001 23012 370.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 WILLDAN GEOTECHNICAL ADMIN FEES -PR 2013-1250 001 23012 66.60 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 WILLDAN GEOTECHNICAL ADMIN FEES -PR 2013-1250 001 34650 -66.60 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 WILLDAN GEOTECHNICAL PROESVCS-EN 04-453 001 23012 370.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 WILLDAN GEOTECHNICAL ADMIN FEES -EN 04453 001 23012 66.60 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 WILLDAN GEOTECHNICAL ADMIN FEES -EN 04-453 001 34650 -66.60 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 WILLDAN GEOTECHNICAL PROFSVCS-EN 11-747 001 23012 877.50 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 WILLDAN GEOTECHNICAL ADMIN FEES -EN 11-747 001 23012 157.95 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 WILLDAN GEOTECHNICAL ADMIN FEES -EN 11-747 001 34650 -157.95 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 1 106200 THERESAWINECKI CONTRACT CLASS -FALL - 0015350 1 45320 1 450.00 $450.00 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 PAYROLL TRANSFER P/RTRANSFER I3/PP 25 112 10200 5,742.23 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 106201 ZAINOTENNISCOURTSINC RESURFACING PARKS 0015340 42210 11,565.00 $11,565.00112/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 13 -PP 25 PAYROLLTRANSFER P/RTRANSFER I3/PP 25 00110200 17fi,692.61 $201,796.14 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 PAYROLL TRANSFER P/RTRANSFER I3/PP 25 112 10200 5,742.23 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 PAYROLL TRANSFER P/RTRANSFER I3/PP 25 113 10200 6,268.88 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 PAYROLLTRANSFER P/RTRANSFER I3/PP 25 115 10200 12,48296 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 PAYROLLTRANSFER PIR TRANSFER I3/PP 25 125 10200 609.46 12/5/2013 12/5/2013 $455,518.75 Page 8 Agenda # 6 .5 Meeting Date: December 17, 2013 CITY COUNCIL ® AGENDA REPORT ��CORPOIt\T"4 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: James DeStefano, City Ma(n , l/ TITLE: ADJOURNMENT OF THE JANU RY 7, 2014 CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO JANUARY 21, 2014. RECOMMENDATION: Approve. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: On Monday and Tuesday, January 6 and 7th the Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem and City Manager will be out of town attending the California Contract Cities 47th Annual Sacramento Legislative Orientation Tour in Sacramento and will not be available to attend the City Council meeting scheduled for January 7th. Staff therefore is recommending that the City Council meeting scheduled for January 7, 20143 be cancelled. If the Council concurs with this recommendation, the meeting shall be adjourned to the regular meeting scheduled for January 21, 2014. Prep red by m eLkl Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk Reviewed €R David oyI6`,- t. ity Manager CITY COUNCIL Agenda # ___6 .6 Meeting Dale: December 17, 2013 AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council VIA: James DeStefano, City Mana e TITLE: SECOND READING OF ORDIN NCE NO. 14(2013): AMENDING DIVISION 5 OF CHAPTER 8.12 OF THE DIAMOND BAR MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO STANDARD URBAN STORMWATER MITIGATION PLAN (SUSMP) REQUIREMENTS BY IMPOSING RAINWATER LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT (LID) STRATEGIES ON PROJECTS THAT REQUIRE BUILDING, GRADING AND ENCROACHMENT PERMITS RECOMMENDATION: Approve second reading by title only and adopt Ordinance No. 14(2013). FINANCIAL IMPACT: The costs for the implementation and maintenance of Best Management Practices (BMP's) associated with the provisions of the proposed ordinance for development or re -development projects will be borne by the developer/property owner. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System ("MS4") Permit (Order No. R4-2012-0175), hereinafter referred to as "Permit", was adopted by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (`Board"), Los Angeles Region on November 8, 2012. The City is a permittee under the Permit issued by the Board, which establishes waste discharge requirements for MS4 discharges within the coastal watersheds of Los Angeles County, except discharges originating from the City of Long Beach. Amendments to Division 5 of Chapter 8.12 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code were presented to Council as Ordinance No. 14(2013) at the December 3, 2013 City Council meeting in order to be in full compliance with the new storm water permit and to provide the City with the necessary authority to enforce the new requirements. Council approved the first reading of the ordinance by title only. Upon approval of the second reading, the amendment to the City's Municipal Code and LID Ordinance will be effective January 17, 2013. PREPARED BY: Kimberly M. Young, Associate Engineer REVIEWE : L David . Li , Director of Public Works Attachment: Ordinance No. 14(2013) 2 DATE PREPARED: December 10, 2013 ORDINANCE NO. XX(2013) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR CALIFORNIA, AMENDING DIVISION 5 OF CHAPTER 8.12 OF THE DIAMOND BAR MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO STANDARD URBAN STORM WATER MITIGATION PLAN (SUMSP) REQUIREMENTS BY IMPOSING RAINWATER LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT (LID) STRATEGIES ON PROJECTS THAT REQUIRE BUILDING, GRADING AND ENCROACHMENT PERMITS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY FINDS AND DETERMINES AS FOLLOWS: A. The federal Clean Water Act establishes Regional Water Quality Control Boards in order to prohibit the discharge of pollutants in stormwater runoff to waters of the United States. B. The City is a permittee under the permit issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region Order No. R4-2012-0175, on November 08, 2012 which establishes Waste Discharge Requirements for Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) Discharges within the Coastal Watersheds of Los Angeles County, except discharges originating from the City of Long Beach MS4. C. Order No. R4-2012-0175 ("Order") contains requirements for the City to establish a LID Ordinance in order to participate in a Watershed Management Program and/or Enhanced Watershed Management Program. D. The Regional Board has adopted Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) for pollutants which are numerical discharge limits that must be achieved effectively through LID implementation. E. The City has the authority under the California Water Code to adopt and enforce ordinances imposing conditions, restrictions and limitations with respect to activity that might degrade waters of the State. F. The City has a stormwater management program that protects water quality and water supply by employing watershed -based approaches that balance environmental and economic considerations. G. Urbanization has led to increased impervious surface areas resulting in increased water runoff and less percolation to groundwater aquifers causing the transport of pollutants to downstream receiving waters. H. As required by the Order the City is expanding the applicability of the existing LID requirements by providing stormwater and rainwater LID strategies for all projects development and redevelopment projects. 9644081 I. This Ordinance will provide the City with the necessary authorization to enforce the new requirements under the Order. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Section 8.12.1670 shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: "All non -storm water discharges through the MS4 not otherwise authorized or conditionally exempt pursuant to Part IIIA of the Municipal NPDES Permit are prohibited." Section 2: The first sentence of Section 8.12.1680 is amended to read as follows: "Owners and occupants of property within the City shall implement best management practices to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants to achieve water quality standards/receiving water limitations." Section 3: A new Subsection 8.12.1690(e) shall be added to provide as follows: "(e) Storm water runoff containing sediment, construction materials or other pollutants from construction or industrial sites or activities and any adjacent staging, storage or parking areas, shall be controlled to the maximum extent practicable whether or not the activity is covered by a NPDES Permit." Section 4: A new Subsection (f) is added Section 8.12.1695, to read as follows: "(f) All new and existing development and redevelopment projects which are required to include structural and treatment BMPs shall be properly maintained and operated to achieve the purpose for which the BMP was designed. Records shall be kept documenting that the BMP is being operated and maintained to achieve the purpose for which it was designed." Section 5: VALIDITY. If any provision of this Ordinance is found to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity shall not affect the remaining provisions of this Ordinance which provisions are declared to be severable from those found to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid. Section 6: EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and operation from and after thirty (30) days after its final passage and adoption. Section 7: The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same or a summary thereof to be published once within fifteen (15) days after this ordinance is passed and adopted, in a newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Diamond Bar and shall post a certified copy of this Ordinance, together with the vote for and against the same, in the Office of the City Clerk. 964408.1 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF DECEMBER, 2013, BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. W Carol Herrera, Mayor I, Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was duly introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the day of December, 2013 and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of 2013, by the following vote: AYES: Council Members: NOES: Council Members: ABSENT: Council Members: ABSTAIN: Council Members: ATTEST: Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk 964408.1 Agenda # 6.7 Meeting Date: December 17, 2013 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT ��KPOiut�� 19Sq TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council VIA: James DeStefano, City Man r TITLE: Reprogram Contingency Funds from Diamond Bar Center Remodel Project ($20,000) to Diamond Bar Center Maintenance and Operation Budget RECOMMENDATION: BACKGROUND: Earlier this year the City Council authorized the construction of staff offices and conference room/sales office at the Diamond Bar Center. Also, included in that project was replacement of the carpet throughout the facility. The City Council awarded a contract to Hoffman Management and Construction for this work in the amount of $159,733. In addition, the Council authorized a contingency of approximately $24,000 for unforeseen circumstances and necessary changes in the field. The construction funds ($183,733) were originally budgeted as the contingency funds for the construction of City Hall but were unspent at the conclusion of that project. Council then reprogrammed the unspent contingency to fund the construction at the Diamond Bar Center. The Diamond Bar Center construction project is nearly complete and the draw against the contingency was negligible. So there are sufficient funds in that project's contingency account to reprogram $20,000 to the Diamond Bar Center Maintenance & Operations budget. DISCUSSION: Over the years the Diamond Bar Center has been in use 7 days a week, nearly 20 hours a day and has been the venue for countless weddings, parties, and other social gatherings. This intense use along with normal exposure to the natural elements has weathered the exterior colored concrete. Over the last 6 months, staff has researched and evaluated a number of options to refresh the look of the colored concrete. It seems the best option to renew the color and protect it for the foreseeable future is to apply coating which will renew the color and act as a sealant preserving the look for at least the next 10 years. The cost to apply the sealant to the exterior perimeter of the Diamond Bar Center is approximately $19,000 and can be paid for using the unspent contingency funds from the Diamond Bar Center staff area remodel construction project. Since the cost of this project is less than $25,000, the contract will be approved and expenditure authorized under the City manager's purchasing authority. Staff is requesting Council authorize the reprogramming of these funds for this purpose. PREPARED BY: —-em David Doy e Assistant City Manager CITY COUNCIL TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council VIA: James DeStefano, City Manager Agenda # 7.1 Meeting Date: December 17, 2013 AGENDA REPORT TITLE: RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -XX APPROVING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM ALLOCATION INCLUDING $201,787 IN FISCAL YEAR 2014-2015 FUNDS AND $11,504 FROM UNALLOCATED BALANCE OF FUNDS FOR THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $213,291 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council open the public hearing, receive testimony and adopt the Resolution. BUDGET IMPLICATION: Funding for the CDBG Program is received from the Federal Government. Approval of the 2014- 2015 CDBG budget will be incorporated into the Fiscal Year 2014-2015 City Budget. The CDBG Program does not impact the City's General Fund budget. BACKGROUND: By way of a Cooperative Agreement, the City of Diamond Bar is part of the Los Angeles County Community Development Commission's Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program. The CDBG Program was established through the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974. The primary goals of the CDBG program are to provide for the development of viable urban communities by providing decent housing and a suitable living environment and expanding economic opportunities, principally for persons of low and moderate income. Eligible CDBG projects are those that meet one of the following national objectives for the program: • Benefiting low and moderate income persons; • Addressing slums or blight; or • Meeting a particular urgent community development need. The projects must also meet one of the eligible activity categories which include acquisition of real property for an eligible use; acquisition, construction, and rehabilitation of public facilities; demolition and clearance of deteriorated buildings; community service for low and moderate income households; removal of barriers that restrict the mobility for elderly or disabled persons; or special economic development activities. Funds may be used for a variety of community development activities such as public services, ADA retrofit and improvements for parks, public works projects, and home improvement programs. The funds may only be used within low and moderate -income census tracts (of which the City has none) and/or to benefit low and moderate -income persons and/or presumed eligible persons (elderly or disabled). The Los Angeles County Community Development Commission (LACDC) has determined that the City of Diamond Bar's preliminary CDBG allocation for Fiscal Year 2014-2015 is $201,787. In addition to the annual allocation, the City will have $11,504 from the accumulated balance of unexpended CDBG funds to use for the FY 2014-2015 CDBG Program, for a combined total program budget of $213,291. LACDC anticipates notification of the final allocation by early 2014. In the event that the actual CDBG funding levels vary from the estimate, the City may adjust the proposed projects and budgets proportionately to the lower funding level. The City's approved projects and budget must be submitted to the Los Angeles County CDC by January 31, 2014. The City of Diamond Bar's projects and budget will ultimately become part of the Los Angeles County's CDBG program application to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). DISCUSSION: Prior to approval of the programs and budget, a public hearing is required to receive and consider citizen input on the proposed CDBG Program. The public hearing notice was posted in various locations in the City including the SCAQMD/Government Center, Diamond Bar Library and Heritage Park. Additionally, the City sent a Request for Proposals to all interested organizations regarding the availability of CDBG funding. Based on the proposals submitted by non-profit agencies and City Departments, past history of applicants, and the availability of funds, funding recommendations have been developed. Prior to a project being funded, eligibility is determined and the sub -recipients must meet the Federal regulations/requirements. The City provides support to the projects that receive funding with technical assistance and monitoring to ensure compliance. The City is responsible for overseeing the operations of all the sub -recipient supported activities including compliance with all applicable Federal requirements and for monitoring the achievement of performance goals. The cost of project administration and contract compliance services are charged on a project -based model which allows the City to pay for costs associated with meeting the regulatory requirements on a per project basis. CDBG project administration is being implemented by City staff with assistance from the City's consultant — Diana Cho and Associates. As part of the application process, the City must describe the programs that are currently being implemented and how those programs are meeting the goals and objectives that have been established by the City. CURRENT CDBG PROJECTS AND ALLOCATIONS FOR FY 2013 - 2014 ($301,190) YMCA Child Care and Day Camp Program ($15,397) - Provides pre-sbhool child care, after-school child care and summer day camp for children from low and low/moderate-income families. CDBG funds are used to provide child care financial assistance for ten (10) children. 2 Senior Programming ($15,397) - Provides senior activities including information and referral, physical mobility classes, seminars, arts and crafts, game days, senior excursions, and special events. General Insurance has been purchased for the senior groups utilizing the Heritage Park Community Center and Diamond Bar Center. Over 500 seniors participate in the various programs and activities offered by the City. Home Improvement Program (HIP) ($150,000) - Offers grants and/or deferred loans to eligible low and moderate -income homeowners for necessary home improvements as well as repairs to mitigate building and safety code deficiencies and/or violations. The Home Improvement Program (HIP) is administered by the City's consultant — SJC 3 Consulting, Inc. Currently, three (3) rehabilitation projects are in construction and three (3) projects are in the bidding and pre -construction phases of the program. Two (2) rehabilitation projects are completed. There is another item on tonight's agenda for City Council to increase the budget by $50,000 to $200,000 in order to fund additional rehabilitation projects in FY 2013-2014. Sidewalk ADA Improvement Project ($60,396) - Funding will provide for the construction of ADA accessible sidewalks and curb ramps in the vicinity bounded by Diamond Bar Blvd., to the south, Grand Avenue to the east, Pathfinder Road/SR57 to the west, and the Gateway Corporate Center to the north. The original allocation of $60,395 is not sufficient to repair all the sidewalks identified for replacement in the target area. T the item�r fight age - ty Gor of l-terese the u�, Staff will bring forward an itern of a fUture meefing 'to increase funding for this program from existing unallocated monies. ADA Handicap Ramps - Pantera Dog Park ($60,000) - Funding provided for the construction of three (3) ADA accessible walkways to the entry gates. The project is completed. PROPOSED CDBG PROJECTS AND ALLOCATIONS FOR FY 2014-2015 - $201,787 in New FY 2014-2015 Funds and $11,504 in Prior Year's Unallocated/Reprogrammed Funds for a combined total of $213,291 Based upon Federal regulations, CDBG funds must be allocated and expended within three (3) years. In addition, cities are strongly encouraged by the LACDC to allocate all monies as soon as feasible. The recommendation for the distribution of CDBG funds is as follows: 2014-2015 Public Service - $30,268 (15% of $201,787 of New FY 2014 — 2015 Funding) The Public Service cap for Fiscal Year 2014-2015 is $30,268, or 15% of the FY 2014-2015 CDBG annual allocation. Three (3) funding applications were submitted for Public Service monies including the City's Senior Programming, the YMCA Child Care and Day Camp Program and the Diamond Bar United Church of Christ Community Garden. For the FY 2014-2015 CDBG funding cycle, staff recommends the following Public Service allocation. City Senior Program FY 13-14 Allocation $15,397 FY 14-15 Total Requested $31,380 FY 14-15 Funding Recommendation $18,768 As in prior years, the Senior Program proposes to combine and include several of the activities and supplies as requested by the Diamond Bar Senior Citizens Club, Diamond Bar Chinese Evergreen Senior Association, Sunshine Seniors Group, Diamond Age Senior Citizen Association, and Super Diamond Age. The CDBG applications for funding from the senior clubs are listed below: K • Diamond Bar Senior Citizens Club - $3,000 Funding is requested for liability insurance, printing and supplies for weekly meetings. • Chinese Evergreen Senior Association - $1,000 Funding is requested liability insurance. • Sunshine Seniors Association - $10,000 Funding is requested for liability insurance and for events supporting seniors. • Diamond Age Senior Club - $7,500 Funding is requested for liability insurance and for senior club activities. • Super Diamond Age Senior Club - $2,000 Funding is requested for liability insurance and for senior club activities. The amount of funds requested for Senior Programming has typically exceeded the CDBG public service projects allocation. For FY 2014-2015, the additional funds required for the City's Senior Program will be paid through the Community Services budget as in prior years. The requested use of FY 2014-2015 CDBG funds is identified in the attached memo from the Community Services Director and is summarized below: City Senior Program Senior Coordinator $20,480 Supplies $ 2,400 Senior Clubs $ 5,000 for Liability Insurance ($1,000 per club) $ 3,500 each for Program Support ($700 per club) Total Requested $31,380 Allocation by Community Services for Senior Programs It is recommended that $18,768 be allocated for Senior Programming. This amount will provide for a portion of the costs for the staff position, supplies, and $1,700 for each of the five (5) Senior Clubs. In addition, the proposed allocation includes funding for CDBG project administration. Diamond Bar YMCA Childcare and YMCA Day Camp FY 13-14 Allocation $15,397 FY 14-15 Request $10,000 FY 14-15 Recommendation $11,500 To provide before and after school childcare and a day camp program for ten (10) to twenty-five (25) low and low/moderate-income children. The proposed allocation includes funding for CDBG project administration. The YMCA submitted its CDBG funding application after the due date for proposals. Staff has accepted the YMCA's FY 14-15 proposal as the agency has been a long-term recipient of the CDBG funds and new YMCA management staff were in the process of becoming familiar with the requirements of various funding sources for the organization. Diamond Bar United Church of Christ FY 13-14 Allocation $ -0- Community Garden FY 14-15 Request $10,000 FY 14-15 Recommendation $ -0- CDBG funds are requested for the design and building of a community garden on an unused portion of land occupied by the Diamond Bar United Church of Christ. There are insufficient CDBG funds to provide funding for a new Public Service project. As the level of federal funding continues to 0 decrease, the two (2) on-going CDBG-funded programs have realized substantial reductions in the last several years. The proposed allocation for the existing CDBG Public Service programs will be reduced if a new project is added. Prior to making a funding recommendation staff met with the pastor and members of the Diamond Bar United Church of Christ to review the site, understand the project concept and discuss the requirements of the CDBG program. While this is certainly a worthwhile project, the limited funds preclude funding this project. Public Service Sub -total Request Recommended Public Service Allocation $51,380 $30,268 The allocation for Public Works and Housing projects includes $171,519 from the FY 2014-2015 allocation and $11,504 in unallocated CDBG funds accumulated from project savings and deferred loan repayments. Staff recommends that the $183,023 be allocated for the Home Improvement Program or Sidewalk ADA Improvements or Handicap Ramp Installation at Star Dust and Longview Park South or Design of ADA Improvements at Star Dust and Longview Park South and Construction of Longview Park South ADA Improvements. Home Improvement Program FY 13-14 Allocation $150,000 FY 14-15 Request $150,000 FY 14-15 Recommendation $100,000 To provide for grants and/or deferred loans to eligible low and moderate -income homeowners for necessary home improvements as well as repairs to mitigate building and safety code deficiencies and/or violations. The proposed allocation includes program administration funds for the HIP consultant. Sidewalk ADA Improvement Project FY 13-14 Allocation $ 60,396 FY 14-15 Request $125,000 FY 14-15 Recommendation $ 83,023 The project is a continuation of the FY 13-14 Sidewalk ADA Improvement Project. Phase II of the project will allow for the repair of existing uplifted sidewalks. Curb ramps will also be installed to provide a continuous ADA accessible path of travel. The target area is bounded by Diamond Blvd., to the south, Grand Avenue to the east, Pathfinder Road/SR 57 to the west, and the Gateway Corporate Center to the north. The proposed allocation includes funding for CDBG project administration and contract compliance. Complete Design of Star Dust Mini- FY 13-14 Allocation $ -0- Park and Longview South Mini -Park FY 14-15 Request $180,000 and Construction of Longview Park FY 14-15 Recommendation $ -0- South ADA Improvements CDBG funds are requested for the completion of design and plans required for the ADA improvements at Star Dust and Longview Park South Mini -Parks and for the removal of architectural barriers to allow handicap access to Longview South Mini -Park. There are insufficient CDBG funds to G� provide funding for this project. Public Works and Housing Sub -total Request $455,000 Recommended Public Works and Housing Allocation $183,023 TOTAL 2014 - 2015 CDBG FUNDS REQUESTED $526,380 TOTAL AVAILABLE /RECOMMENDED 1213,291 The purpose of the public hearing is to solicit public testimony and receive presentations from the public service organizations requesting funds. It is an opportunity for the City Council to question the proposed public service organizations as well as City staff regarding the applications under consideration. Prepared and Reviewed by: David D yle Assistant City Manager Attachments: A - Matrix of Projects / Recommended Funding Options B - Resolution 2013 -XX C - CDBG Project Applications A CITY OF DIAMOND BAR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT 2014-15 PROGRAM YEAR City of Diamond Bar Senior Community Services Services Diamond Bar Senior Senior Club . Services Sunshine Senior Senior Club Services Evergreen Senior Senior Club Services Diamond Age Senior Senior Club Services Super Diamond Age Senior Senior Club Services Diamond Bar/ Walnut YMCA Child Care Day Camp $15,397 $31,380 $18,768 ATTACHMENT A Included in Included in Community Services Community Included in City Dept. Allocation Services Dept. Request Request Included in Included in Community Services Community Included in City Dept. Allocation Services Dept. Request Request Included in Included in Community Services Community Included in City Dept. Allocation Services Dept. Request Request Included in Included in Community Services Community Included in City Dept. Allocation Services Dept. Request Request Included in Included in Community Services Community Included in City Dept. Allocation Services Dept. Request Request $15,397 $10,000 $11,500 Diamond Bar United Community Church of Christ Garden $ -0- $10,000 $ -0- Community Garden Sub -total $30,794 $51,380 $30,268 1 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT 2014-15 PROGRAM YEAR P ` City Council : "' Requested" ; Staff City. , : ;A�ency ` Senrice Provided,, Allocated Funds, -Council Recommendations' FY 13;14':,' FY 1415 ; , 'Allocation;" Public Works"',,,'' and'Housmg, 85°lu $171,19 Unallocated Balance 11504 Ow 41 City of Diamond Bar Home -Community Improvement $150,000 $150,000 $100,000 Development Program City of Diamond Bar Sidewalk ADA - Public Works Improvement $ 60,396 $125,000 $83,023 Project Complete Design of Star Dust and City of Diamond Longview Bar -Community South Mini- Parks and $ _0- $180,000 $ -0- Services Construction of Longview Park South ADA Improvements Sub -total $210,396 $270,000 $183,023 ;29 P Agenda No. '8.1 DIAAiOND BARMEMORANDUW i TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: James DeStefano, City Ma a BY: Greg Gubman, AICP, Com munit Development Director DATE: December 17, 2013 SUBJECT: City Council Agenda Item 8.1 - Willow Heights/Site D Project - Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295, Development Review and Tree Permit (Planning Case No. PL 2013- 229), and Addendum No. 1 to the Site D Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report On November 19, 2013, The City Council conducted a public hearing regarding the subject development applications. The matter was continued to December 3, 2013 with direction to staff to return with information that would enable the Council to consider adding a condition to require the segment of the Brea Canyon Channel traversing the project site to be covered. Staff completed the requested research, and a report of its findings was published as part of in the December 3`6 City Council meeting agenda. At the applicant's (Lennar Homes) request, the matter was postponed to December 17, 2013. Public comments pertaining to this matter were nonetheless received at the December 3`d meeting. A copy of the December 3, 2013 staff report is enclosed. Staff requests the Council bring the Willow Heights plans (included in the November 19th agenda packet) to the upcoming meeting in the event that further discussion of the project's other design components is needed. On December 12, 2013, staff received the enclosed letter from Lennar proposing to make a $700,000 contribution to the City as an alternative to covering the channel. Should the City Council agree to accept Lennar's proposal, staff recommends that the Council adopt the resolution from the November 19, 2013 agenda packet with the addition of the following condition, to be inserted between Condition nos. 4 and 5, on page 16, of the resolution: The applicant has voluntarily agreed to make a one-time contribution to the City's Park & Facility Development Fund in the amount of $700,000. Accordingly, the applicant shall remit such contribution in 182 installments of $3,846.15. Each installment shall be paid upon the issuance of a building permit for a new dwelling unit. Staff recommends City Council approval of the proposed contribution in lieu of covering the channel. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or Greg Gubman. Enclosures December 11, 2013 James DeStefano City Manager City of Diamond Bar 21810 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4178 Re: Response to Request to Evaluate Covering Brea Canyon Channel, VTTM 72295, Willow Heights Dear Mr. DeStefano: In accordance with the direction of City Council provided on November 19, 2013, City staff investigated the feasibility of covering the Brea Canyon Flood Control Channel (Channel) and reported back to City Council at the December 3`d, 2013 meeting. We are writing to express our sincere concerns with covering the Channel and to provide an alternative to City staff and City Council for its consideration. Per the December 3rd City Council staff report, covering the Channel is a very complex and risky endeavor, which entails removal of the existing trapezoidal channel, diverting the existing storm flows, and re -construction of new box culverts. This also introduces several agencies not directly related to the entitlements being sought. In short, covering the Channel would result in: • an uncertain time horizon related to delivery of the park to the community, • uncertainty related to practical use of the covered area, including additional maintenance cost and limited use, since the Channel is owned by the Los Angeles County Flood Control District, • uncertain aesthetic value due to potential Flood Control District restrictions, which may require use of hardscape covering and potential use for parking, • additional disruption to the neighbors, pedestrians, and traffic due to a lengthier and more complex construction effort, and • delay in the overall residential project to allow City Staff and Lennar time to further study the repercussions and requirements associated with covering the Channel. We are challenged to make the connection between our project and any requirement to cover or otherwise improve or enhance the Channel. The open Channel is an existing condition, which the Project would not make worse. Indeed, the Project would enhance the aesthetic of the area by developing attractive park space surrounding the Channel. The Specific Plan also expressly provides that the Channel "will most likely not be covered" and no provision of the City Code or other regulation of which we are aware, requires covering or improving the Channel. Lastly, the costs associated with covering the Channel seem disproportional with the potential aesthetics benefits sought, particularly given that the Channel is an existing condition. 25 Enterprise • Suite 300 s Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 • Main: 949-349-8000 Mr. DeS[efano December 11, 2014 Page 2 of 2 Nevertheless, we appreciate the City Council's desire to bring high-quality parks to the City. To that end, we offer the following alternative community benefit to covering the Channel: Lennar will voluntarily contribute up to $700,000 to the City's capital improvement fund to fund City projects such as trails, parks, and other improvements. Lennar volunteers to provide these funds at an amount of $3,847 per home developed, prior to the issuance of each building permit. These funds would allow for upgrades that would have an immediate, direct, long-term and meaningful impact on the community of Diamond Bar. If the City Council were to accept this volunteered contribution in lieu of requiring covering or otherwise enhancing the Channel, Lennar would accept imposition of this voluntary measure as a condition of approval of the Project. We look forward to the December 17th City Council meeting to approve Willow Heights and acceptance of our contribution of $700,000 to the City. It is clear this community will bring many economic and quality of life benefits to the residents of Diamond Bar and to the School District and we look forward to getting started. Please do not hesitate to contact me at (949) 349-8285 should you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, INC. Geoffrey Smith Director of Community Development CITY COUNCIL Agenda # 8 , 1 Meeting Date: December 3, 2013 AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council VIA: James DeStefano, City Ma 'a r TITLE: Willow Heights—Vesting Tentati Tr ct Map No. 72295, Development Review and Tree Permit (planning Case No. PL2013-229) PROPERTY OWNERS: Walnut Valley Unified School District ("WVUSD") and City of Diamond Bar ("City") APPLICANT: Lennar Homes of California, Inc. ("Lennar") 25 Enterprise, Suite 300, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 PROJECT LOCATION: Commonly referred to as "Site D," the subject property is comprised of approximately 30 acres located at the southeast corner of Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard (Los Angeles County Assessor's Parcel Numbers 8714-002-900, 8714-002-901, 8714-002-902, 8714-002-903 and 8714-015-001). RECOMMENDATION: Consider the options outlined in the staff report and take one of the actions listed on Page 5. BACKGROUND: The City Council conducted a public hearing on November 19, 2013, closed the public hearing, and continued this item to December 3, 2013 in order to allow staff to obtain information about the feasibility and procedural requirements associated with covering the segment of the Brea Canyon Flood Control Channel that bifurcates the proposed Site D neighborhood park. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS: The Los Angeles County Department of Public Works would likely grant a permit to replace the existing concrete -lined channel with a reinforced concrete box storm drain that could then be covered with earth and landscaping. The construction cost to the developer would likely exceed $2 million. The City would be required to enter into a Page 1 Use Agreement with the Los Angeles County Flood Control District in order to incorporate the channel covering into the park. In addition to routine park maintenance expenses, the City would assume maintenance and insurance obligations. In order to require the channel to be covered, it would be necessary for the Council to direct Lennar to prepare a revised grading and drainage plan so that staff can revise the Addendum to the Final EIR and revise the conditions of approval in order to set forth appropriate performance standards for the completion of the park and channel improvements. The revised plans are also needed in order for the Council to approve a specific design concept that Lennar would be obligated to implement. ANALYSIS: Storm Drain Requirements The existing Los Angeles County Flood Control District's right-of-way area is approximately 0.67 acres in area, 50 feet wide, and approximately 500 feet long. It is currently a trapezoidal, concrete -lined, open culvert. It would not be possible to simply place a deck over the existing channel. Instead, the existing trapezoidal structure would have to be demolished and replaced with a 21 -foot wide by 10 -foot tall reinforced concrete double -box culvert. The top of the box culvert would be several feet below the finished grades of the proposed park, so the surface elevation of the channel cover would depend on the amount of fill placed on top of it. The graphic below illustrates a conceptual design that was provided under the Site D Specific Plan when a commercial pad was contemplated for use of a parking lot above the covered channel. This design required an average fill/cover of 20 feet above the concrete box to bring the surface elevation approximately level with Diamond Bar Boulevard. Page 2 Cross Section of Reinforced Concrete Double Box Culvert County Permit and Use Requirements: Staff consulted with the Flood Control District's Survey Mapping Property Management Division and Land Development Division regarding the procedural requirements to cover the channel. There are two components to the County's approval process to allow the channel to be covered and used for recreational purposes, which are outlined below: 1) A construction permit is required from the Land Development Division, Flood Permits Section. A conceptual plan approval process takes approximately 5 weeks. During this time, the County will determine the conditions of approval warranted for this project. After the conceptual approval is granted, construction documents can be submitted for plan check. According to the County, the entire permit process takes approximately 4 to 5 months. 2) A joint Use Agreement is required between the Flood Control District and City to use and maintain the covered right-of-way area for recreational purposes. The agreement is a lease allowing surface air rights above the channel for non -flood control purposes, subject to the approval of the County Board of Supervisors for an initial 25 -year term, which can be renewed or extended thereafter. The City would be required to maintain the easement area in a safe, clean, and orderly condition (e.g., removal of trash, graffiti, and close the gates to the underground channel structure during heavy storms, etc.). The Flood Control District has the right to cancel the agreement upon 90 days written notice if the District needs to implement a water quality or conservation mandate for watershed management purposes. The approval of the joint Use Agreement takes approximately 6 to 9 months and can be processed concurrently with the construction permit. A copy of the County's sample Use Agreement is provided in Attachment 2. Page 3 Construction Costs Details such as the degree of impacts (if any) to Diamond Bar Boulevard and the grading involved during construction are unknown at this time. However the City of Industry constructed a similar channel improvement along a segment located north of the 60 freeway, west of the former Burger King parcel, where an open, trapezoidal channel was replaced with a boxed culvert. It took approximately one year to obtain County approvals. Construction bids ranged from $1 to $1.5 million. The channel improvements for that project were smaller in size and length—concrete box structure was 7'X8'-2" and 400 feet long—than what will be required for the Brea Canyon Flood Control Channel. Based on the cost factors associated with the Industry project, it is roughly estimated that the construction costs would be $2 million for the improvements to the Brea Canyon Flood Control Channel Timeframe for Permits and Construction: Based on consultation with some engineering firms that have managed similar projects, the total timeframe from application submittal to the County to completion of construction is approximately 18 to 24 months. Other Regulatory Permits Required: If the channel is covered, the existing permits that are currently being reviewed by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) will need to be amended since the channel improvements will result in additional impacts to jurisdictional water. Implications on Project Timing: The draft Resolution approving the project as previously submitted includes a condition of approval requiring the neighborhood park to be completed prior to the issuance of the building permit for the 100th dwelling unit. Since covering the channel is a more extensive permitting process with a County agency, the condition of approval needs to be modified to allow the construction to be phased and/or bonded in order to allow Lennar to proceed with the construction of the homes without being subject to undue delays associated with the channel improvements. Operating Cost for Covered Channel Area: The associated costs to maintain a landscaped turf area above the covered channel is estimated to be $0.37 per square foot, totaling $10,800 per year for on-going maintenance expense which is incurred by the City. The annual maintenance cost for a typical boxed storm drain is estimated to be $20,000 per year. In addition, pursuant to the terms of the aforementioned Use Agreement, the City would be required to provide liability insurance and accept certain maintenance obligations. Page 4 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: The project was continued from the November 19, 2013 City Council meeting and therefore no further noticing was required. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: A Response to Comments to the Addendum to the FEIR (Attachment 3) was prepared to address what is required to enable the City Council to approve the project with a channel covering. Staff believes that the modifications to the project incorporating the channel covering can be addressed in the Addendum to the FEIR. However in order to understand the environmental impacts with covering the channel, a revised conceptual grading plan, updated hydrology study, and revised conceptual park plan is required to complete the environmental analysis. Upon submittal of this information, staff will be able to determine to what extent the Addendum to the FEIR would need to be altered and/or whether the Addendum would continue to suffice as the appropriate manner to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). ALTERNATE ACTIONS AVAILABLE TO THE COUNCIL: There are four options for the Council to consider, which are described below: 1. If the Council chooses to approve the project as previously submitted, adopt the attached Resolution (Attachment 1) to approve the Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Development Review, and Tree Permit for Planning Case No. PL2013-229, to allow the subdivision for the development of 182 for -sale dwelling units and a 2.5 net acre neighborhood public park, based on the findings of DBMC Sections 21.20.080, 22.22.150, 22.48.040, and 22.38.110, subject to conditions of approval as listed within the draft resolution; OR 2. Direct the applicant to revise plans to include covering the channel with landscape improvements and continue the item to a specified date to allow the applicant additional time to submit revised plans and studies. Upon submittal of the required information, staff will complete the environmental assessment associated with the impacts of covering the channel and prepare a revised resolution for Council's consideration: OR 3. Remand the project to the Planning Commission with specific direction from the City Council; OR 4. Deny the Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Development Review, and Tree Permit, specifically identifying the reasons the required findings of DBMC Sections 21.20.080, 22.22.150, 22.48.040, and 22.38.110 cannot be made. Page 5 Prepared by: Gra - S. Lee Senior Planner Reviewed by. -,--- Davi Director of Public Works Attachments: Reviewed by: Greg Gubman, AICP Community Development Director Draft CC Resolution No. 2013 -XX and Standard Conditions of Approval Sample Use Agreement Addendum No. 1 Response to Comments Page 6 James DeStefano From: Geoffrey Smith [Geoffrey.Smith@Iennar.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2013 4:03 PM To: James DeStefano Subject: Willow Heights Item, City Council Agenda for Tonight Jim, We are continuing to deliberate internally regarding your counteroffer to our proposal of a capital contribution in lieu of a condition requiring Lennar to cover the flood control channel. At this point we are furthering the discussions and respectfully request that our item be continued to the next meeting held on December 17th. Thank you, Geoff Geoff Smith Director of Community Development Lennar Homes - California Coastal geoffrey smith(a)lennar com www.lennar.com Office: 949-349-8285 Direct: 949-278-6661 Fax: 949-349-0394 25 Enterprise, Ste. 300 Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 2 �R,, R• M.NOW• r •, • • . , • ' 19 .1 1 1. The Subject Property is currently comprised of five parcels totaling 30 acres (Assessor's Parcel Numbers are 8714-002-900, 8714-002-901, 8714-002-902, 8714-002-903, and 8714-015-001). The Walnut Valley Unified School District owns approximately 29 acres, and the City of Diamond Bar owns a 0.98 acre strip of land along Brea Canyon Road, east of the Brea Canyon Flood Control Channel. A 0.67 acre segment of a flood control channel, owned and maintained by the Los Angeles County Flood Control District, separates the City and School District properties. The Subject Property is located in the Site D Specific Plan zone with a General Plan land use designation of Specific Plan located at the southeast corner of Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard, Diamond Bar, Los Angeles County, California ("Project Site"). 2. On February 21, 2012, the Diamond Bar City Council approved the Site D Specific Plan (SDSP), which set forth regulatory criteria to guide the development of the vacant, undeveloped 30 -acre Site D Project area. The SDSP provides for the development of up to 200 for -sale dwelling units, and requires at least two acres to be set aside and developed as a public neighborhood park. In conjunction with approval of the SDSP, on February 21, 2012, the Diamond Bar City Council certified "Final Environmental Impact Report — `Site D' Specific Plan, SCH No. 2008021014" (FEIR), and adopted "Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Consideration" for each of the significant environmental impacts identified in the FEIR and each of the alternatives presented therein. From both a programmatic and project -level perspective, the FOR analyzed the potential environmental impacts resulting from the SDSP's approval; the development of the Project Site for residential, recreational, and open space uses; the construction of housing, a recreational facility, and accompanying on-site and off-site infrastructure improvements; the occupancy of that housing and the public use of the recreational facility; and the on-going operation, habitation, use, and maintenance of the Project Site. Further, the FEIR envisioned not only the adoption of the SDSP and the land - use entitlements associated therewith, but also the subsequent r'evelopment of the "Site D" property in a manner generally consistent with the SDSP. 3. '-he Applicant, Lennar Homes of California, 9,rc., filed an application for the tollowing entitlements: (1) Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295 to subdivide an existing vacant 30 -acre lot into 63 lots for the development of 182 for -sale dwelling units and a 2.5 net usable acre neighborhood public park; (2) Development Review of the proposed architectural and landscape design elements associated with the proposed residential component of Site D; and (3) Tree Permit to remove 83 existing protected trees consisting of 75 Southern Black Walnuts, 6 Willows, and 2 Coast Live Oaks, and replace them at a 3:1 ratio with 75 Coast Live Oaks and 174 Sycamores, totaling 249 replacement trees to be planted on-site. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Development Review, and Tree Permit shall be collectively referred to as the "Project." 4. In conjunction with the Project, it is contemplated (a) that the Walnut Valley Unified School District and the City of Diamond Bar will transfer their respective interests in the Project Site to the Applicant, or its successor or assign, and (2) that the City will accept dedication of a maximum of 4.3 acres of property (designated as Lots 62 and 63 on Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295) for public park purposes from Applicant or its successor or assign. Government Code Section 65402 provides that if there is an applicable general plan, no real property shall be acquired by dedication or otherwise for street, square, park or other public purposes, and no real property shall be disposed of, until the location, purpose and extent of such acquisition or disposition have been reported upon by the planning agency as to conformity with the general plan. 5. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) has been prepared for the Project, which concludes that the Project is in substantial conformance with the SDSP and that no new environmental issues have been identified that would have any potentially significant impacts on the environment with the proposed mitigation measures included. 6. The City Council has independently considered the Addendum, along with the FEIR, and finds, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 21166, that no further environmental documentation is required due to the following reasons: 1) substantial changes are not proposed in the Project which will require major revisions of the FEIR, 2) substantial changes did not occur with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is being undertaken which will require major revisions in the FEIR, and 3) there is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the FEIR was certified as complete, showing that: (a) the Project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the FEIR; (b) significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the FEIR; (c) mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the Project, but the mitigation measures or alternatives have not been adopted; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives considerably different from those analyzed in the FEIR would substantially reduce one or more significant 2 City Council Resolution No. 2Di3-XX effects on the environment, but the mitigation measures or alternatives have not been adopted. 7. On November 8, 2013, notification of the public hearing for this Project was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers. Public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 1,000 -foot radius of the Project Site, and to all speakers who have previously attended the Planning Commission and City Council hearing on the SDSP and community workshops. The public notices were posted at the City's designated community posting sites on November 8, 2013. In addition to the published and mailed notices, the Project Site was posted with a display board. 8. On October 8, 2013, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing, solicited testimony from all interested individuals, and concluded said hearing on that date. 9. On November 19, 2013, the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing, solicited testimony from all interested individuals, and concluded said hearing on that date. 10. The documents and materials constituting the administrative record of the proceedings upon which the City's decision is based are located at the City of Diamond Bar, Community Development Department, Planning Division, 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765. NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: 1. That all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein and as prescribed under Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Sections 21.20.080, 22.22, 22.48, and 22.30.050, this City Council hereby finds and approves as follows: Tentative Map Findings: Pursuant to Subdivision Code Section 21.20.080 of the City's Subdivision Ordinance, the City Council hereby makes the following findings: 1. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the general plan and any applicable specific plan: The Project is a new master -planned gated residential community consisting of 102 for -sale dwelling units within three distinct neighborhood settings, as well as a 2.5 net usable acre neighborhood public park to be dedicated to the City. The Project is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Specific Plan as well as the Site D Specific Plan in terms of land use, and the design and appearance of the Project is compatible with the surrounding community. 3 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX The Project is consistent with the General Plan and Site D Specific Plan as follows: ® Quality Housing. The Project contributes to the diversity of the City's housing stock with an attractive housing development accommodating people of diverse ages, cultures, occupations and levels of financial status; and will serve as a visual gateway into the City with its distinctive identity. ® Buffer from existing homes. The Project is designed to minimize the negative impacts on the surrounding homes. A transition between the development and adjacent homes is achieved through 30 -foot wide landscaped setbacks around the entire site. The setbacks will be densely planted and maintained with Oak and Sycamore trees, and shrubs in order to provide a buffer between the Project and the existing residences along Ambushers Street, Pasado Drive, and Cold Springs Lane. • View impacts from Neighboring Homes. The Project is designed to create a minimal visual impact to the adjacent homes by building the new dwellings downhill on lower pad levels than the existing homes in the vicinity in order to retain view corridors. ® Neighborhood Public Park. The Project creates a community environment which nurtures social and recreational opportunities for its residents. The conceptual park plan is derived from a community consensus design produced during a neighborhood design. charette. As a requirement of the SDSP, Lennar solicited input from the residents on the design and types of amenities they would like to see incorporated into the future neighborhood park. The participants were generally supportive of the proposed park layout, and there was consensus regarding the types and locations for a number of amenities and features. ® Entry Feature. The Project offers an aesthetically pleasing development incorporating community identity through a significant landmark entry feature at the corner of Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard to mark the entrance into the City. ® Public Streetscape Improvements: Landscaped parkways with street trees, sidewalks, and bike trails will be required along Diamond Bar Boulevard, and the Project will conditioned to comply with Citywide Streetscape Design Standards currently being developed as part of the Grand Avenue Beautification Plan. 2. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development: The Project will be consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Specific Plan and the zoning designation of Site D Specific Plan, which allows for the development of up to 200 for -sale dwelling units and minimum two acre usable neighborhood public park. The Project Site is located within an urbanized area adequately served by existing roadways and infrastructure, The 4_ City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX Project will not cause any intersections or street segments in the vicinity to operate at unacceptable level of service with the mitigation measures and improvements required as part of the Project approval. Therefore the property is physically able to accommodate the Project. 3. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or injure fish or wildlife or their habitat: In order to demonstrate compliance with applicable state and federal resource protection policies designed to protect or compensate for the loss of biological resources, the following mitigation measures are part of the Project approval and were adopted as part of the Site D Specific Plan approval: ® The applicant is required to demonstrate receipt of any discretionary permits and approval as may be required from the Unites States Army Corps of Engineers and Regional Water Quality Control Board (ACOE/RWQCB) and California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFVV) and commit to the provision of compensatory jurisdictional resources meeting or exceeding the following minimal standards: (1) the on-site and/or off-site replacement of CDFW jurisdictional waters and wetlands at a 2:1 ratio; (2) the on-site and/or off-site replacement of CDFW jurisdictional streambed and associated riparian habitat at a 2:1 ratio; and (3) the incorporation of design features into the Project's design and development enhancing the site's biological resources. ® Measures to mitigate impacts to California walnut woodland will be orchestrated in concert with the replanting of trees protected by the City's tree preservation and protection ordinance. Prior to final approval of a grading permit or initiation of any activity that involves the removal/disturbance of oak and walnut woodland habitat, the applicant shall develop a detailed tree mitigation plan describing the number, size, and location of compensatory trees to be planted and outline success criteria and adaptive management procedures to ensure that the mitigation plan is successful, and submit the plan to the City for review and approval. Mitigation shall include a minimum replacement ratio of 3:1, totaling 249 replacement trees to be planted on-site. ® As determined feasible by the Community Development Director, initial vegetation removal activities shall be conducted outside the nesting season (February 15 -August 15) to avoid impacts upon nesting birds. If initial vegetation removal activities occur during the nesting season, prior to the commencement of any grading or grubbing activities, all suitable habitat shall first be thoroughly surveyed by a qualified biologist for the presence of nesting birds. If any active nests are detected, a buffer of at least 300 feet (500 feet for raptors) shall be delineated, flagged, and vegetation removal activities avoided therein until the nesting cycle is complete, as determined by the surveying biologist or a qualified biological monitor. 5_ City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX 4. The design of the subdivision, or type of improvements will not cause serious public health or safety problems: The proposed subdivision or type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health or safety problems because the site has been designed to comply with the minimum factors of safety by establishing grades that meet certain elevation targets. The site was designed to build the southeastern portion of the site (detached single-family lot pads) at a higher elevation. The design to build up the building pads along the southeastern portion of the site also stabilizes the slopes of the existing homes abutting the site. Grading of the Project Site will be conducted in accordance with the recommendations outlined in the Project's geotechnical investigation so as to assure that geotechnical stability is maintained or increased. The on-site circulation and access to the site will not result in unsafe driving conditions. Site access has been analyzed by a traffic engineer and fair -share traffic improvement requirements have been set forth, ingress and egress to the site has been carefully designed. The internal private street configuration, widths, and circulation are sufficient, which has been reviewed and approved by the County of Los Angeles Fire Department. The interior roadway layout is primarily guided by the organization of land uses within the subdivision, as well as site-specific topographic and geotechnical factors. The site was designed to build the southeastern portion of the site at a higher elevation, which resulted in the curvature of the private streets. 5. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision: There are currently no public easements within Site D; therefore, the Project will not impede any preexisting public access rights. 6. The discharge of sewage from the proposed subdivision into the community sewer system would not result in violation of existing requirements prescribed by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board: The applicant shall construct a sanitary sewer system in accordance with the City, Los Angeles County Public Works Department, and County Sanitation District Standards prior to building occupancy. A condition of project approval requires a fair share payment in the amount of $78,081.60 (based on a 15% impact to the Emergency Storage Capacity at the Castle Rock Pump Station as indicated in the Sewer and Water System Analysis dated September 24, 2013) and $29,438.71 (based on a 3.6% impact to the Emergency Storage Capacity at the Fountain Springs Pump Station as indicated in the Sewer and Water System Analysis dated September 24, 2013), to be accepted by the City prior to the issuance of the final sewer inspection sign off and sewer improvement bond release. The proposed subdivision has been analyzed under the Addendum to the FOR and found not to violate any requirement of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. 6_ City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX 7. A preliminary soils report or geologic hazard report does not indicate adverse soil or geologic conditions: The grading of the Project Site will be constructed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the recommendations contained in the preliminary geotechnical investigation to assure that geotechnical stability is maintained or increased. 8. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable provisions of the City's subdivision ordinance, the development code, and the subdivision map act: Conformity with the applicable provisions of the Subdivision Map Act, Subdivision Code and Development Code was verified by the City during the technical review of the Project. Any inconsistencies during the review process were corrected prior to the City deeming the Project complete and placing the matter on the Planning Commission public hearing agenda. Moreover, the Project is in substantial conformance with the Site D Specific Plan. Hillside Management Objectives (DBIVIC Section 22.22) 1. Natural topographic features and appearances are preserved by means of landform grading so as to blend man-made or manufactured slopes into the natural topography: The fundamental shaping of the property will be graded to be consistent with the existing topography. The existing profile of the property will be mimicked and the slopes bordering Diamond Bar Boulevard and the large slopes on the southern end of the property will add to a backdrop to the development. However, to achieve a balanced site, the areas on the northern portion of the property will be at lower elevation than the southeast portion of the property. The southeastern portion of the site will be built on a higher elevation, which results in the curvature of the private streets and two 16 -foot high retaining walls to separate the two main building pads. All finished slopes will be no greater than 50 percent (2:1). 2. The preservation of Natural topographic features and appearances are preserved through restrictions on successive padding and terracing of building sites: The site grading was designed around geotechnical constraints of the site. There are two main building pads proposed: 1)'townhome and detached -single family condo neighborhoods; and 2) detached single-family neighborhood. These two main pads are located on different elevation levels, separated by two 16 -foot high Verdura walls. The detached single-family lots are created at a higher elevation towards the southeast portion of the site with the private street climbing to the east and south into the individual single family lots, The lower %_ City Council Resolution No. 2013 XX pad consists of two tiers, with the townhomes on the lo.✓er tier and the single- family detached condos on the upper tier. 3. Major natural topographic features, drainage courses, steep slopes, watershed areas, vernal pools, view corridors, and scenic vistas are retained: The Project is designed to create minimal visual impact to the adjacent homes by building the new dwellings downhill on a lower pad level than the existing homes in the vicinity in order to retain view corridors. The buildings are located in a manner that preserves the views and is kept as low as possible to reduce or eliminate the possibility of blocking views of existing residences. 4. The preservation and enhancement of prominent landmark features, significant ridgelines, natural rock outcroppings, protected trees and woodlands (chapter 22.38, Tree Preservation and Protection), and other areas of special natural beauty: There are no ridgelines or rock outcroppings within the subject property. The applicant will replant 249 native Oak and Sycamore trees to mitigate the removal of 83 existing protected trees. In addition, the Project is required to incorporate a significant landmark entry feature near the corner of Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard to mark the key entrance into the City. The design of this feature will seek to visually draw from elements of the community and/or history of the City. The removal of the riparian features within the Subject Property was addressed in the Final EIR and will be mitigated accordingly. 5. The utilization of varying setbacks, building heights, foundation designs and compatible building forms, materials, and colors which serve to blend buildings into the terrain: The Project consists of three distinct neighborhoods, each defined by its own housing type on different building elevations/pads. Each housing type has varied architectural building details, finishes and treatment on the elevations, and there is diversity between the units from street view. Earth tone building materials and color schemes are used that blend in with the natural landscape, and landscaping is used to screen view of down slope building elevations, and slopes are planted with informal clusters of trees and shrubs to soften and vary the slope plane. 6. The utilization of clustered sites and buildings on more gently sloping terrain so as to reduce grading alterations on steeper slopes; The entire site will be graded and recontoured to accommodate the Project. The Project consists of three distinct neighborhoods on different elevations/pads. The lower pad consists of two tiers, with the townhomes on the lower tier and the single-family detached condos on the upper tier. The detached single-family lots are created at a higher elevation towards the southeast portion of the site. 8 My Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX 7. The utilization of building designs, locations, and arrangements which serve to avoid a continuous intrusive skyline effect and which afford view privacy and protection; The Project will retain views by creating building pads that remain below existing developed sites, maintaining substantial separations between existing and new structures, and limiting the building heights to 35 feet or less, as well as screen for privacy where appropriate, with heavily landscaped slopes along the site's easterly and southern boundaries. 8. The preservation and introduction of plant materials so as to protect slopes from soil erosion and slippage and minimize the visual effects of grading and construction of hillside areas: There are 30 -foot landscaped setbacks that provide screening and buffering around the site's boundaries. A dense stand of Sycamore and Oak trees—to replace the Walnuts and Oaks removed as part of the Project—is proposed to be planted within the large slopes abutting the existing residences. 9. The utilization of street designs and improvements which serve to minimize grading alterations and harmonize with the natural contours and character of the hillsides: The interior roadway layout is primarily guided by the organization of land uses within the subdivision, as well as site-specific topographic and geotechnical factors. Due to ancient landslides, the site was designed to build the southeastern portion of the site at a higher elevation, which resulted in the curvature of the private streets and two 16 -foot high retaining walls to separate the two main building pads. The design to build up the building pads along the southeastern portion of the site also stabilizes the slopes of the existing homes abutting the site. Development Review Findings (DBMC Section 22.48) 1. The design and layout of the proposed development are consistent with the general plan, development standards of the applicable district, design guidelines, and architectural criteria for special areas (e.g., theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards or planned developments): The Project is designed pursuant to the development standards and design guidelines contained in the Site D Specific Plan and incorporates the following features: Green, Sustainable Development: Provides a green and sustainability model requirement looking at energy efficiency, healthy indoor air quality, waste reduction, water efficiency, use of renewable and recyclable materials for building construction, etc. in addition, landscape irrigation will be designed for future reclaimed water connection. 9 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX Building Setbacks: The buildings will have 30 -foot setbacks from Diamond Bar Boulevard and along the perimeter of the Project Site. The building elevations along street view are articulated and diversified. ® Landscaped Setbacks: There are 30 -foot landscaped setbacks that will provide screening and buffering around the site's boundaries. A dense stand of Sycamore and Oak trees—to replace the Walnuts and Oaks removed as part of the Project—is proposed to be planted within the large slopes abutting the existing residences. ® Retaining Walls: Three-foot high, integral color split -face retaining walls will be constructed along Diamond Bar Boulevard with hedges to cover the face of the walls in order to soften its visual appearance. Two 16 -foot high Verdura walls will also be constructed as retaining walls, which are filled with suitable backfill and live vegetation planted in the individual cells. Flowering evergreen vines will be planted at the top of the slope to provide for cascading plantings to further landscape the wall. ® Fences and Walls: Three styles of decorative, privacy, and security walls are proposed: 1) plastered masonry block walls located in the vicinity of the entry gate, 2) wrought iron fences behind the rear yards of the detached single-family condos along Diamond Bar Boulevard, and 3) vinyl fences in the side yards of each unit. ® Private Internal Streetscape Requirements: There will be canopy trees such as Brisbane Box and Crape Myrtle trees planted along the private internal streets. Special landscape treatment and decorative textured pavement will be provided at the intersection of Cherrydale and the shared main driveway. 2. The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards: The Project will not interfere with the use or enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments because the Project is designed to minimize the negative impacts on the surrounding homes. A transition between the Project and adjacent homes is achieved through 30 -foot wide landscaped setbacks around the entire site. A dense stand of Sycamore and Oak trees is proposed to be planted within the large slopes abutting the existing residences. Therefore a landscaping buffer will be maintained in order to provide some distance from existing residences along Ambusher Street, Pasado Drive, and Cold Springs Lane. In addition, the Project is designed to create a minimal visual impact to the adjacent homes by building the new dwellings downhill on a lower pad level than the existing homes in the vicinity in order to retain view corridors. The Project will not interfere with vehicular or pedestrian movements, such as access or other functional requirements. A traffic analysis report concluded that the proposed Project will not cause any intersections or street segments in the vicinity to operate at an unacceptable level of service with the mitigation 10 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX measures and improvements require) as part of Project approval. The existing roadways will be improved as part of the Project. 3. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain and enhance the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by this chapter, the general pian, or any applicable specific plan: The Project is designed to be compatible and complementary to the neighborhood, and conforms to the SDSP as well as incorporates the principles of the City's Residential Design Guidelines as follows: ® Quality Housing. The Project contributes to the diversity of the City's housing stock with an attractive housing development accommodating people of all ages, cultures, occupations and levels of financial status; and will serve as a visual gateway into the City with its distinctive identity. ® Buffer from existing homes. The Project is designed to minimize the negative impacts on the surrounding homes. A transition between the Project and adjacent homes is achieved through 30 -foot wide landscaped setbacks around the entire site. A dense stand of Sycamore and Oak trees is proposed to be planted within the large slopes abutting the existing residences. Therefore a landscaping buffer will be maintained in order to provide some distance from existing residences along Ambusher Street, Pasado Drive, and Cold Springs Lane. ® View Impacts from Neighboring Homes. The Project is designed to create a minimal visual impact to the adjacent homes by building the new dwellings downhill on a lower pad level than the existing homes in the vicinity in order to retain view corridors. ® Neighborhood Public Park. The Project creates a community environment which nurtures social and recreational opportunities for its residents. The conceptual park plan is derived from the community consensus design. As a requirement of the SDSP, Lennar solicited input from the residents on the design and types of amenities they would like to see incorporated into the future neighborhood park. The participants were generally supportive of the proposed park layout, and there was consensus regarding the types and locations for a number of amenities and features. Entry Feature. The Project offers an aesthetically pleasing development incorporating community identity through a significant landmark entry feature at the corner of Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard to mark the entrance into the City. ® Public Streetscape Improvements: Landscaped parkways with street trees, sidewalks, and bike trails will be required along Diamond Bar Boulevard; and the Project will conditioned to comply with the streetscape designs in the Grand Avenue Beautification Plan (Citywide Streetscape Design 11 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX Standards), and incorporate tree wells, bus shelters, fencing and wall, within the public right-of-way. 4. The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture and color, and will remain aesthetically appealing: The Project will serve as a visual gateway into the City with its distinctive identity, incorporate a significant landmark entry feature near the corner of Diamond Bar Boulevard and Brea Canyon Road, and provide public right-of- way enhancements in accordance with the forthcoming Citywide Streetscape Design Standards currently being developed by staff. In addition, the Project has varied architectural building details, finishes and treatment on the elevations, and there is diversity between the units from street view. 5. The proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious (e.g., negative effect on property values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity: Before the issuance of any City permits, the Project is required to comply with all conditions within the approved resolution, and the Building and Safety Division and Public Works Departments, and L.A. County Fire Department requirements. The referenced agencies through the permit and inspection process will ensure that the Project is not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. 6. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA): The City certified the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the SDSP on February 21, 2012. The FOR analyzed the potential environmental impacts resulting from the SDSP's approval from both a programmatic and project -level perspective, analyzing the development of the Project Site for residential and recreational uses with accompanying on-site and off-site infrastructure improvements. With the submittal of a project -specific application, an Addendum to the FOR has been prepared, which includes minor technical changes and additions in order to determine the Project's consistency with the SDSP. The Project is in substantial conformance with the SDSP and the Addendum to the FOR documents that no new environmental issues has been identified and states the reasons to support the findings that the Project would not have any potentially significant impacts on the environment with the proposed mitigation measures included. A mitigation reporting and monitoring program (MRMP) has been prepared, which address site-specific conditions for the Project. The purpose of the 12 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX MRMP is to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures. The Project is conditioned to include these mitigation measures as part of Project approval. Tree Permit Findings (DBMC Section 22.38.110) 1. Preservation of the tree is not feasible and would compromise the property owner's reasonable use and enjoyment of property and surrounding land and appropriate mitigation measures: The Project requires the removal of 83 existing protected trees consisting of 75 Southern California Black Walnuts, 6 Willows, and 2 Coast Live Oaks. The preservation of these trees is not feasible because if would compromise the design and construction of the Project. The applicant is proposing to replant native Oak and Sycamore trees instead of Southern Black Walnut trees because Southern Black Walnuts have a tendency to have a weak branching structure and are prone to splitting. In addition, these trees do not have a lot of inventory in the local nurseries. The replacement trees will be planted at a 3:1 ratio with 75 Coast Live Oak and 174 Sycamore trees, totaling 249 replacement trees, to be a minimum 24 inch box size. The replacement trees will provide sufficient replacement of the natural landscape. General Plan Conformance (Government Code Section 65402) 1. In compliance with Government Code Section 65402, the contemplated transfer of Site D to the Applicant and the dedication of parkland to the City are in conformity with the City's General Plan. In conjunction with the Project, it is contemplated that the Walnut Valley Unified School District and the City of Diamond Bar will transfer their respective interests in the Project Site to the Applicant, or its successor or assign. The proposed Project will be consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Specific Plan and the zoning designation of Site D Specific Plan, which allows for the development of up to 200 for -sale dwelling units and minimum two acre usable neighborhood public park. Transfer of Site D to a developer for development of a project consistent with the Site D Specific Plan was expressly contemplated when the Site D Specific Plan and associated General Plan Amendment were adopted. In conjunction with the Project, it is also contemplated that the City will accept dedication of a maximum of 4.3 acres of property (designated as Lots 62 and 63 on Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295) for public park purposes from Applicant or its successor or assign. This is be consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Specific Plan and the Site D Specific Plan, which expressly contemplates dedication to the City of a minimum two acre usable neighborhood public park. The acceptance of dedication of additional park land by the City in conjunction with the Project is also consistent with the following provisions of the General Plan: 13 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX ® Land Use Element—Goal 3, Objective 3.2, Strategy 3.2.1 stakes: Within the urban residential portions of the City, require the incorporation of open space and recreational areas into the design of new projects. ® Resource Management Element—Goal 1, Objective 1.3, Strategy 1.3.7 states: Develop recreation facilities emphasizing active and passive recreation areas and actively pursue land acquisition for parks. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein and as prescribed under DBMC Sections 21.20.080, 22.22.150, 22.48.040, and 22.38.110, this City Council hereby finds and approves the Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Development Review, and Tree Permit, subject to the following conditions, and the attached Standard Conditions of Approval: MININNEEM 1. The following Conditions of Approval, including the Standard Conditions of Approval attached hereto, shall be binding on and enforceable against, and, whenever used herein, the terms "applicant", 'owner", and/or "applicant/owner" shall mean and refer to, each of the following: the project applicant, Lennar Homes of California, Inc., the owner(s) and tenants(s) of the property, and each of their respective successors and assigns. 2. The following Conditions of Approval, including the Standard Conditions of Approval attached hereto, shall be binding on and enforceable against, and, whenever used herein, the terms "applicant', 'owner', and/or "applicant/owner' shall mean and refer to, each of the following: the project applicant, Lennar Homes of California, Inc., the owner(s) and tenants(s) of the property, and each of their respective successors and assigns. 3. The subdivision shall comply with the Conditions of Approval attached hereto and referenced herein. 4. This approval shall not be effective for any purpose until the applicant/owner of the property involved has filed, within twenty-one (21) days of approval of this Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295, Development Review, and Tree Permit No. PL2013-229, at the City of Diamond Bar Community Development Department, an affidavit stating that the applicant/owner is aware of and agrees to accept all the conditions of this approval. Further, this approval shall not be effective until the applicant pays the remaining City processing fees. 5. The applicant shall comply with Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.34.050. A permanent landscape maintenance program shall be implemented ensuring regular irrigation, fertilization, and weed removal. All landscaping shall be maintained in a healthy, neat and orderly condition, free of weeds and debris and with operating irrigation 14 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX at all times. Provisions for ongoing maintenance of all areas of the Subject Property under the jurisdiction of a future homeowners association shall be set forth in the association CC&R's, which shall be subject to review and approval by the City prior to final map recordation. 6. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020, the Applicant is informed that the 90 -day period in which the Applicant may protest the fees, dedications, reservation or other exaction imposed on this approval through the conditions of approval has begun. 1. Prior to the recordation of the final map, the development shall comply with the specific requirements of Chapter 21.30 (Subdivision Design and Improvement Requirements) and Chapter 21.34 (Improvement Plans and Agreements) of the Subdivision Ordinance, as applicable. Final map approval will not be granted unless the map is in substantial compliance with Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295 including all conditions, and the applicant has entered into a subdivision improvement agreement to the satisfaction of the City Attorney. 2. The approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295 expires within three years from the date of approval if the recordation of the map has not been exercised as defined per Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Section 21.20.140. The applicant may request for a time extension if such request submitted to the City in writing is no less than 30 days prior to the approval's expiration date, subject to DBMC Section 21.20.150 for City Council approval. 3. All conditions of approval/performance standards and mitigation measures adopted by the City Council in conjunction with its certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Site D Specific Plan (SCH No. 2008021014), as revised as outlined in the Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report, which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and hereby incorporated herein by reference, shall be implemented and complied with. All required mitigation monitoring fees shall be deposited with the City 90 days prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All costs related to the ongoing monitoring shall be secured from the applicant and received by the City prior to the approval of the final map. 4. The Site D Specific Plan requires dedication to the City of a minimum of 2.0 net acres of usable public park space. The applicant has proposed to develop 4.7 acres of park space, approximately 2.2 acres of which will consist of a rain garden serving both as a required water detention facility for the subdivision and as a passive public recreational facility. In consideration for the City's acceptance of a dedication of 4.3 gross acres of public park land (of which a minimum of 2.5 net acres must be 15 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX usable), the applicant has voluntarily agreed to pay the City a one-time fee in the amount of $136,500.00 to offset future operation and maintenance costs of the 4.3 gross acres of park land, including the rain garden / detention basin. Accordingly, the applicant (i) shall include on the final map an irrevocable offer to dedicate to the City a maximum of 4.3 gross acres and a minimum of 2.5 net usable acres of property within Lots 62 and 63 identified on the Vesting Tentative flap for public park purposes; and (ii) prior to City's acceptance of the dedication, shall pay the City a one-time payment for the operation and maintenance costs of the park in the amount of $136,500.00. 5. Prior to the issuance of the building permit for the 100th dwelling unit, the park shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Community Services Director. Following completion of the park, there shall be at least 120 days for plant establishment before consideration for park turnover to the City. If the 100th dwelling unit is within a multi -unit building, the building permit for the entire building shall be withheld until the park is completed. 6. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for the first residential unit, the applicant shall submit detailed design of the park showing all the elements and amenities for review and approval by the Community Development Director and Community Services Director. The park design shall also be reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Commission prior to final approval. The design elements shall include, at minimum, the following: ® Two sets of tot lots for 5-12 year olds, and shall include swing set (could be combined in one location if space is insufficient). ® Two sets of tot lots for 2-5 year olds, and shall include swing set (could be combined in one location if space is insufficient). ® Pedestrian/maintenance vehicle bridge over Brea Canyon Flood Control Channel. ® Rain Garden interpretive area, must be fenced with lockable gates. ® Two sets of picnic areas (shall include shade structure(s) if requested by City). • Trail head for future Crooked Creek trail. ® Six stations of exercise equipment. Two drinking fountains. ® Two park identification signs. 16 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX ® Above -ground drain on the south end of the lot adjacent to Brea Canyon Road shall be covered. ® Parking lot for a minimum of six spaces, to be developed on the south end of the lot, adjacent to Brea Canyon Road. ® Corner entry feature. ® Twelve park benches. ® Centralized irrigation system. ® Decorative fence shall be installed between Brea Canyon Road and Neighborhood Park. In addition, the final park design plans shall include landscaping along the south of the pathway between Pasado Drive and the pedestrian bridge to serve as a visual barrier between the path and backyards of residences south of the development to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director and Community Services Director. The City reserves the right to eliminate any of the above park elements at its sole discretion. 7. Prior to dedication of the public park to the City, a detailed Maintenance and Operations Plan for the basin area referred to on the Project Plans as the Rain Garden shall be submitted to the Community Services Director for review and approval. 8. All concrete inlet/outlet structures in the detention basin/Rain Garden shall be adequately landscaped to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director and Community Services Director. 9. The Rain Garden shall include shade structures and benches, subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director and Community Services Director. 10. Prior to the City's acceptance of the Applicant's offer of dedication of the public park, the Applicant shall construct an "entry feature" in the vicinity of the Diamond Bar Boulevard and Brea Canyon Road. With regards to its design characteristics, the entry feature shall seek to visually draw from elements of the community and/or- its history and serve as a "gateway" informing motorists and other viewers that they have entered the City of Diamond Bar. The minimum standard of performance used to measure compliance with this requirement shall be that the entry feature shall have a value, as determined by the Community Development Director, of not less than one-half of one percent (0.005) of the total building permit valuation for all residential structures within the Project boundaries. 17 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX 11. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall prepare Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association for the approval of the Planning Division, Public Works/Engineering Department, and the City Attorney. The approved CC&Rs shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map, and a recorded copy shall be provided to the Community Development Department. Without limiting the City's approval rights, the CC&Rs shall, at a minimum, comply with the following requirements: i. The CC&Rs shall require the Homeowners' Association to submit to the Planning Division, a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. ii. The Conditions of Approval for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295, Development Review, and Tree Permit (Planning Case No. PL 2013-229) shall be incorporated into the CC&Rs, and provisions corresponding to any applicable Conditions of Approval shall be included in the CC&Rs. The CC&Rs shall require that all portions of the project be used, improved, repaired and maintained in strict compliance with all applicable provisions of the Conditions of Approval. iii. The CC&Rs shall include a provision acceptable to the City requiring the Homeowners Association and the property owners to maintain the project in compliance with all applicable water quality laws, regulations, and standards of the State, City, or any other applicable governmental agency, to implement, and fund implementation of, the approved Operation and Maintenance ("O&M") Plan for the property, and to operate and maintain the Best Management Practices ("BMPs") described in the O&M Plan. iv. The CC&Rs shall include provisions regarding the preservation of Oak and Sycamore trees as outlined in the tree mitigation plan. v. The CC&Rs shall include provisions to the effect that the secondary master suite in the NextGen homes included in Plan 2 of the 60x70 lots, shall not contain a cooktop kitchen facility and separate metered utilities. vi. The CC&Rs shall include a provision that street trees on Diamond Bar Boulevard shall be irrigated from the development's automatic irrigation system. vii. The CC&Rs shall include provisions acceptable to the City regarding graffiti abatement. viii. The CC&Rs shall identify the City as an express third party beneficiary for purposes of enforcing the CC&Rs and these Conditions of Approval and shall give the City the right, but not the 18 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX obligation, to enforce the provisions of the CC&Rs and the Conditions of Approval by any legal or equitable means, or by any method available to the HOA, against the Declarant, HOA, property owners, their successors and assigns, or other persons in possession of the Project. In the enforcement of the CC&Rs, the City shall not be limited to the procedures or processes applicable to the HOA and may use any remedy provided under law or equity, including the City's Municipal Code. Any Alternative Dispute Resolution procedures set forth in the CC&Rs shall not apply to or bind the City. ix. The CC&Rs may not be terminated or substantially amended without prior written approval of the City. 12. Prior to the final map recordation or issuance of building permit, whichever comes first, the applicant shall provide the City with a "Buyer's Awareness Package" for the City's review and approval. The "Buyer's Awareness Package" shall include, but is not limited to, information pertaining to geological issues regarding the property, wildlife corridors, preservation of Oak and Sycamore trees, natural vegetation preservation issues, maintenance program for urban pollutant basins, all mitigation measures within the Mitigation Monitoring Program and explanatory information pertaining to restrictions on the use of properties such as the secondary master suites in the NextGen homes, and similar related matters. The applicant shall give each buyer a copy of the "Buyer's Awareness Package" and shall document their receipt of the same in the escrow instructions of each lot and document their receipt to the City. 13. The secondary master suite in the NextGen homes included in Plan 2 of the 60x70 lots, shall not contain a cooktop kitchen facility and separate metered utilities. The provisions to this effect shall be included in the Buyer's Awareness Package. 14. Prior to final map approval, street names shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public Works/Engineering Department. Street names shall not duplicate existing streets within the City of Diamond Bar's postal service zip code areas. 1. This approval is for the site plan, elevations, exterior materials, and conceptual landscape plans for a new 182 -unit residential development to be constructed at the southeast corner of Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard, as described in the staff report and depicted on the approved plans on file with the Planning Division, subject to the conditions in this Resolution. 2. The construction documents submitted for plan check shall be in substantial compliance with the architectural plans approved by the City Council, as modified pursuant to the conditions below. If the plan check 19 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX submittal is not in substantial compliance with the approved Development Review submittal, the plans may require further staff review and re -notification of the surrounding property owners, which may delay the project and entail additional fees. 3. Prior to building permit issuance, landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for review and approval by the City's Consulting Landscape Architect for compliance with the Water Conservation Landscaping Ordinance. Appropriate and sufficient irrigation shall be provided to the Verdura walls and fast growing plant materials that grow all year round shall be used. 4. All existing landscaping and public improvements damaged during construction shall be repaired or replaced upon project completion. 5. All lighting fixtures shall be approved by the Planning Division as to type, orientation, and height. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate type, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 6. The applicant shall install street lighting along the internal private streets within the development. 7. The main entry gate, walls, and directory kiosk shall include decorative pilasters such as stacked stone or similar material, subject to the review and approval of the Planning Division. 8. The emergency access gate at the end of Pasado Drive shall have a decorative pattern, and final design shall be subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director and Community Services Director. 9. All landscape areas on the site as well as contiguous landscaped slopes along Diamond Bar Boulevard shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy and thriving conditions, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 10. Prior to the issuance of building permits, house numbering plans shall be submitted to and approved by the City Public Works Department. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. 11. Best Management Practices (BMP) devices shall be designed in consultation with the Greater Los Angeles County Vector Control District and shall be of a type which minimizes the potential for vector (public 20 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX nuisance) problems and maintained throughout the project life so as not to contribute to those problems. Unless accepted by the County and/or by the City, the responsibilities for and the funding of the maintenance of BMPs shall constitute obligations of the homeowners association. 12. In order to demonstrate compliance with applicable State and federal resource protection policies designed to protect or compensate for the loss of biological resources, prior to the issuance of grading permit, where applicable, the Applicant shall provide the Community Development Director with documentation of receipt of the following permits: (1) Section 401 (Federal Clean Water Act) water quality certification or waiver of waste discharge requirements from the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region; (2) nationwide Section 404 (Federal Clean Water Act) permit from the Unites States Army Corps of Engineers; and (3) Section 1602 (California Fish and Game Code) streambed alteration agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game. The Applicant shall comply with all associated permit requirements. 13. As determined feasible by the Community Development Director, initial vegetation removal activities shall be conducted outside the nesting season (February 15 -August 15) to avoid impacts upon nesting birds. If initial vegetation removal activities occur during the nesting season, prior to the commencement of any grading or grubbing activities, all suitable habitat shall first be thoroughly surveyed by a qualified biologist for the presence of nesting birds. If any active nests are detected, a buffer of at least 300 feet (500 feet for raptors) shall be delineated, flagged, and vegetation removal activities avoided therein until the nesting cycle is complete, as determined by the surveying biologist or a qualified biological monitor. 14. Prior to approval of the park plan, the applicant shall obtain all requisite permits and approvals from the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works — Flood Control District allowing for the building of the pedestrian/maintenance vehicle bridge over the Brea Canyon Flood Control Channel, and shall provide the City Engineer with documentation, acceptable to the City Engineer, demonstrating County approval and authorization, including a complete list of all permit requirements that may be associated therewith. 15. Prior 'to the issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall submit and, when deemed acceptable, the City Engineer shall approve a construction worker parking and equipment staging plan (PESP) designed to minimize disturbance to the surrounding residences to the greatest extent feasible. Unless otherwise authorized therein, contractors and other construction personnel performing construction activities in proximity to the project site shall be prohibited from parking and/or operating construction equipment, dumpsters, trailers, or other material within a public right-of-way or other public property. The PESP can be 21 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX combined with or become a part of the construction traffic safety plan and/or any other construction management plan as may be required by the City. 16. Unless previously approved by the City Engineer, no construction access shall be authorized from and no construction traffic shall be permitted along Castle Rock Road and Pasado Drive, except as may be required to construct and maintain any project -related street and other improvements within and adjacent to those rights-of-way. 17. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall submit and, when deemed acceptable, the City Engineer shall approve a construction traffic mitigation plan (CTMP). The CTMP shall identify the travel and haul routes to be used by construction vehicles; the points of ingress and egress for all construction vehicles; temporary street or lane closures, temporary signage, and temporary striping; location of materials and equipment staging areas; maintenance plans to remove spilled debris from roadway surfaces; and the hours during which large construction equipment may be brought on/off the project site. The Applicant shall keep all haul routes clean and free of debris including but not limited to gravel and dirt as a result of its operations. The Applicant shall clean adjacent streets, as directed by the City Engineer, of any material which may have been spilled, tracked, or blown onto adjacent streets or areas. Hauling or transport of oversize loads will be allowed between the hours of 9:00 AM and 3:00 PM only, Monday through Friday, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. No hauling or transport will be allowed during nighttime hours, weekends, or federal holidays. The use of local streets shall be limited only to those that provide direct access to the destination. Haul trucks entering or exiting public streets shall at all times yield to public traffic. If hauling operations cause any damage to existing pavement, street, curb, and/or gutter along the haul route, the Applicant will be fully responsible for repairs. The repairs shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 18. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall submit and, when deemed acceptable, the City shall approve a traffic control plan (TCP). The TCP shall be consistent with the Southern California Chapter of the American Public Works Association's "Work Area Traffic Control Handbook" (WATCH), the California Department of Transportation's "Manual of Traffic Controls for Construction and Maintenance Work Zones," or such alternative as may be deemed acceptable by the City. The TCP shall describe the Applicant's plans to safely and efficiently maintain vehicular and non -vehicular access along local roadways throughout the construction period. If any temporary access restrictions or lane closures are proposed by the Applicant, the TCP shall delineate detour routes, the hours, duration and frequency of such restrictions, and the emergency access and safety measures that will be implemented during those closures or restrictions. The TCP can be combined with or become a -6-54 of the construction traffic safety plan 22 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX and/or any other construction management plan as may be required by the City. 19. As determined by the City Engineer, should project -related construction activities result in the short-term closure of the existing Class II bicycle lanes or Class III bicycle paths along Diamond Bar Boulevard and/or Brea Canyon Road, during the term of that closure, signage shall be posted and other reasonable actions designed to enhance public safety taken within the area of those closures informing both motorists and bicyclists of that action. 20. Prior to the approval of any subsequent tentative tract map or the initiation of any improvements to Diamond Bar Boulevard that would result in the elimination of the existing Class II bicycle lane within that right-of-way, the City Engineer shall review street improvement plans for Diamond Bar Boulevard and determine the potential for retention, reconfiguration, and/or reclassification of the existing Class II bicycle lane along the property's frontage, within the existing right-of-way or as a result of the dedication of additional public right-of-way along Diamond Bar Boulevard or within the tract map boundaries and linking with the existing terminus points beyond the boundaries of the project site. Should the City Engineer determine that none of those options are feasible or desirable, a study shall be conducted and, when acceptable, approved by the City Engineer ascertaining whether the near -site elimination of the existing Class II bicycle lane will adversely impact rider safety or traffic flow and what actions can be taken by the City and/or the Applicant to maintain a sufficient level of rider and motorist safety. The findings of that study and the recommendations contained therein shall be submitted to the City Council for their consideration. 21. In order to reduce freeway -related noise impacts, all residential units shall include forced air ventilation designed and installed in accordance with Title 24 of California Building Code standards. 22. Prior to the commencement of grading activities, the Applicant shall prepare and submit for review by the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department (LACSD) a draft construction security plan outlining the activities that will be instituted by the Applicant to secure the construction site and the equipment and materials located thereupon from potential criminal incidents. The Applicant shall incorporate the recommendations of the LACSD, if any, into a final construction security plan and shall implement that plan during the construction period. 23. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the LACSD shall be provided the opportunity to review and comment upon building plans and the configuration of the residential development and neighborhood park in order to: (1) facilitate opportunities for improved emergency access and response; (2) ensure the consideration of design strategies that facilitate public safety and police surveillance; and (3) offer specific design 23 City Council Reso[ution No. 2013 -XX recommendations to enhance public safety and reduce potential demands upon police protection services. 24. Prior to the commencement of grading or grubbing activities, the Applicant shall prepare and submit and the Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACFD) shall review and, when deemed acceptable, approve a fire protection program and workplace standards for fire safety outlining those activities to be undertaken by the Applicant during the construction period. The Applicant shall abide by specific project -level permit conditions identified by the LACFD. 25. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACFD) will review and, when deemed acceptable, approve (1)final water improvement plans including, but not limited to, the location, sizing, design, and fire flow capacity of the proposed water mains and fire hydrants and proposed access improvements to ensure compliance with applicable Fire Code requirements; and (2) building plans. The project's water system shall be designed in response to final fire flow requirements identified by the LACFD. 26. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall submit to the Building Official for review and approval a temporary fencing and signage plan designed to discourage access to any active construction areas by children and other unauthorized parties. 27. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall present the City with a certificate of compliance or other documentation demonstrating that the Applicant has complied with the Walnut Valley Unified School District's School Board resolutions governing the payment of school impact fees or has entered into an Assembly Bill 2926 authorized school fee mitigation agreement or is not subject to the school impact fee exaction. y, — 1. Prior to final approval of a grading permit or initiation of any activity that involves the removal/disturbance of oak and walnut woodland habitat, the applicant shall develop a detailed tree mitigation plan specifying the following: (1 )describe the number, size, and location of compensatory trees to be planted; (2) outline success criteria and adaptive management procedures to ensure that the mitigation plan is successful; (3) a maintenance agreement stipulating the applicant's obligations for a minimum three-year period, including the annual reporting; (4) the amount and derivation of the security deposit required under the City's tree preservation ordinance; and submit the plan to the City for review and approval. Mitigation shall include a minimum replacement ratio of 3:1, totaling 249 replacement trees to be planted on-site. 24 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX The City Council shall: (a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and (b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution by certified mail to: Geoff Smith, Lennar Homes of California, Inc., 25 Enterprise, Suite 300, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 and Jeanette Ullrich, Assistant Superintendent, Walnut Valley Unified School District, 880 S. Lemon Avenue, Walnut, CA 91789. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2013, BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. M Jack Tanaka, Mayor I, Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 19h day of November 2013, by the following vote: AYES: Council Member: NOES: Council Member: ABSTAIN: Council Member: ABSENT: Council Member: ATTEST: Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk City of Diamond Bar 25 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX •!V 05, 1 T, 1• 1 s i s PROJECT : Vesting Tentative Tract Map No 72295 Development Review, and Tree Permit (Planning Case No. PL 2013-229) SUBJECT: A Vesting Tentative Tract Map to subdivide an existing vacant 30 -acre lot into 63 lots for the development of 182 for -sale dwelling units and minimum two acre neighborhood public park Development Review of the proposed architectural and landscape design elements associated with the proposed residential component of Site D and Tree Permit to remove 83 existing protected trees and replace them at a 3:1 ratio with 249 replacement trees to be planted on-site. PROPERTY OWNERS: Walnut Valley Unified School District and City of Diamond Bar APPLICANT: Lennar Homes of California Inc 25 Enterprise Suite 300 Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 LOCATION: Southeast Corner of Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard, Diamond Bar, CA 91789 APPLICANT(• THE PLANNING DIVISION AT .fir. 839-7030, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING C• D •' 1. In accordance with Government Code Section 66474.9(b) (1), the applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, and its officers, agents and employees, from any claim, action, . r proceeding to attack, set-aside, void or annul the approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Development Review, and Tree Permit No. PL2013-229 brought within the time period provided by Government Code Section 66499.37. In the event the city and/or its officers, agents and employees are made a party of any such action: 26 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX (a) Applicant shall provide a defense to the City defendants or at the City's option reimburse the City its costs of defense, including reasonable attorneys fees, incurred in defense of such claims. (b) Applicant shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against the City defendants. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action of proceeding, and shall cooperate fully in the defense thereof. 2. This approval shall not be effective for any purpose until the applicant and owner of the property involved have filed, within twenty-one (21) days of approval of this Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Development Review, and Tree Permit No. PL2013-229 at the City of Diamond Bar Community Development Department, their affidavit stating that they are aware of and agrees to accept all the conditions of this approval. Further, this approval shall not be effective until the applicants pays remaining City processing fees, school fees and fees for the review of submitted reports. 3. All designers, architects, engineers, and contractors associated with this project shall obtain a Diamond Bar Business License, and zoning approval for those businesses located in Diamond Bar. 4. Signed copies of City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all partied involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of City permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Revised plans incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval during plan check. 7. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval shall be completed. 8. The project site shall be maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of approval and all laws, or other applicable Federal, State, or City regulations. 9. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and any applicable Specific Plan in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 10. Property owner/applicant shall remove the public hearing notice board within three (3) days of this project's approval. 27 - City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX 11. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of Planning and Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works/Engineering Department, and the Los Angeles County Fire Department. 12. These conditions of approval shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all future owners, operators, or successors thereto of the property. Non- compliance with any condition of approval or mitigation measure imposed as a condition of this approval, shall constitute a violation of the City's Development Code. Violations may be enforced in accordance with the provisions of the Development Code. 13. To ensure compliance with the provisions of the City Council design approval, a final inspection is required from the Planning Division when work for any phase of the project has been completed. The applicant shall inform the Planning Division and schedule an appointment for such an inspection. 14. Failure to comply with any of the conditions set forth herein or as subsequently amended in writing by the City, may result in failure to obtain a building final and/or a certificate of occupancy until full compliance is reached. The City's requirement for full compliance may require minor corrections and/or complete demolition of a non-compliance improvement, regardless of costs incurred where the project does not comply with design requirements and approvals that the applicant agreed to when permits were pulled to construct the project. 1. Applicant shall pay development fees (including but not limited to Planning, Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works Department and Mitigation Monitoring) at the established rates, prior to issuance of building permits, as required by the City. School fees as required shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permit. In addition, the applicant shall pay all remaining prorated City project review and processing fees prior to final map approval. 2. Prior to final map approval, all deposit accounts for the processing of this project shall have no deficits. C. TIME LIMITS 1. The approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Development Review, and Tree Permit shall expire within three (3) years from the date of approval if the use has not been exercised as defined pursuant to Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 21.20.140 and 22.66.050(b)(1). In accordance with Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22,60.050(c), the applicant may request, in writing, for a one-year time extension for City Council consideration. Such a request must be submitted to the Planning Division prior to the expiration date and be accompanied by the review fee in accordance with the Fee Schedule in effect at the time of submittal. 28 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX 1. The project site shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the approved plans submitted to, approved, and amended herein by the City Council, on file with the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 2. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, air conditioning condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berms, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Division. 3. All roof -mounted equipment shall be screened from public view. 4. All structures, including walls, trash enclosures, canopies, etc., shall be maintained in a structurally sound, safe manner with a clean, orderly appearance. All graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours by the property owners/occupant. 5. No occupancy permit can be granted, until all improvements required by this approval have been properly constructed, inspected, and approved. 6. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the location, size, and screening of all building utility service connections, including water, gas, and electric service, fire service, and irrigation connections shall be approved by the Community Development Director. All changes to building utility connections shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to construction. Building utility connections shall be located, sized and screened in such a manner that they have the least possible impact on the design of the building and site. The architect of record shall be directly involved in the design and placement of all site and building service connections and shall sign all plans submitted to the City which locate, size and/or screen utility connections. 7. Additional plant materials may be required by the Community Development Director and shall be planted prior to final occupancy in order to screen utility connections, valves, backflow devices, and all above ground appurtenances, etc., to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. This determination shall be made in the field after all screen utility connections, valves, backflow devices, and all above ground appurtenances, etc. have been installed and inspected. 1. The site shall be maintained in a condition, which is free of debris both during and after the construction, addition, or implementation of the entitlement approved herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether during or subsequent to construction shall be done only by the property owner, applicant or by a duly permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste from 29 -_ - City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX residential, commercial, construction, and industrial areas within the City. It shall be the applicant's obligation to insure that the waste contractor used has obtained permits from the City of Diamond Bar to provide such services. 2. Mandatory solid waste disposal services shall be provided by the City franchised waste hauler to all parcels/lots or uses affected by approval of this project. 3. All trash pick-ups shall be for individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view. I If 1. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for review and approval with the park precise grading plans. 2. A title report/guarantee showing all fee owners, interest holders, and nature of interest shall be submitted with final map plan check. An updated title report/guarantee and subdivision guarantee shall be submitted ten (10) business days prior to final map approval. 3. A permit from the Los Angeles County Public Works Department and/or Los Angeles County Flood Control District (LACFCD) shall be required for work within its right-of-way/easements or connection to its facilities. 4. Prior to final map approval, written certification that all utility services and any other public utility service related to the site shall be available to serve the proposed project and shall be submitted to the City. Such letters shall be issued by the respective utility company within ninety (90) calendar days prior to final map approval. 5. Prior to final map approval, applicant shall submit to the City Engineer the detail cost estimates for bonding purposes of all onsite/offsite improvements including grading, street improvement, sewer, storm drain, landscape and irrigation, and monumentation. 6. Prior to final map approval, if any public or private improvements required as part of this map have not been completed by applicant and accepted by the City, applicant shall enter into a subdivision agreement with the City and shall post the appropriate security. 7. Prior to final map approval, all site grading, landscaping and irrigation, street, sewer and storm drain improvement plans shall be approved by the City Engineer, surety shall be posted, and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all public and private improvements. 30 City Council Resolution No. 2013 XX 8. Prior to issuance of grading permits, storm drain plans shall be approved with surety posted guaranteeing completion of all drainage facilities to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 9. Any details or notes which may be inconsistent with requirement or ordinances, general conditions of approval, or City policies shall be specifically approved in other conditions or ordinance requirements as modified to those shown on the vesting tentative tract map upon approval by the City Council. 10. All identified geologic hazards within the project boundaries which cannot be mitigated as approved by the City Engineer shall be indicated on the final map as "Restricted Use Area' subject to geologic hazard. The applicant shall dedicate to the City the right to prohibit the erection of buildings or other structures within such restricted use areas shown on the final map. 11. Prior to finalization of any development phase, sufficient street, sewer, and drainage improvements shall be completed beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access, proper outfall for sewers and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot lines shown on the final map. 12. Prior to any work performed in the existing street right-of-way along Diamond Bar Blvd., Brea Canyon Road, Pasado Drive or Castle Rock Road permit fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Department in addition to any other permits required. 13. Applicant shall label and delineate on the final map any private streets, driveways or fire lanes to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 14. Upon recordation of the final map, applicant shall submit to the Public Works/Engineering Department, at no cost to the City, a full size reproducible copy of the recorded map. Final acceptance of the public improvements shall not be given until the copy of the recorded map is received by the Public Works/Engineering Department. 15. Prior to occupancy, the applicant shall provide to the City as built mylars, stamped by appropriate individuals certifying the completion of all improvements at no cost to the City. 16. Applicant shall contribute funds to a separate engineering trust deposit against which charges can be made by the City or its representatives for services rendered. Charges shall be on an hourly basis and shall include any City administrative costs. 17. Applicant shall provide digitized information in a format defined by the City for all related plans, at no cost to the City. 31 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX 18. All activities/improvements proposed for this VTTM 72295 shall be wholly contained within the boundaries of the map. Should any off-site activities/improvements be required, approval shall be obtained from the affected property owner and the City as required by the City Engineer. 1. No grading or any staging or construction shall be performed prior to final map approval by the City Council and map recordation or grading permit issuance, whichever comes first. All pertinent improvement plans shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval by the City Council. 2. Prior to the issuance of any City permits, the applicant shall provide written permission to the satisfaction of the City from any property owners which will be affected by offsite grading. 3. All sewer and storm drain plans shall be approved prior to grading permit issuance. 4. Prior to beginning any grading activities, appropriate rodent control shall be installed around the perimeter of the project site to prevent the migration of rodents to existing residential and commercial sites. A plan detailing the proposed rodent barriers to be used by the developer/contractor shall be submitted to the Public Works/Engineering Department and Planning Division for review. 5. Retaining wall location shall be shown on the grading plan and submitted with a soils report to the Public Works/Engineering Department for review concurrently with the grading plan check. 6. Grading and construction activities and the transportation of equipment and materials and operation of heavy grading equipment shall be limited to between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. Dust generated by grading and construction activities shall be reduced by watering the soil prior to and during the activities and in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 402 and Rule 403. Reclaimed water shall be utilized whenever possible. Additionally, all construction equipment shall be properly muffled to reduce noise levels. 7. All equipment staging areas shall be located on the project site. Staging area, including material stockpile and equipment storage area, shall be enclosed within a 6 foot -high chain link fence. All access points to the staging area shall be locked whenever the construction site is not supervised. 8. Precise grading plans for each lot shall be submitted to the Public Works/Engineering Department for approval prior to issuance of building permits. 32 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX 9. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the California Building Code, City Grading Ordinance, Hillside Management Ordinance and acceptable grading practices. 10. The maximum grade of driveways serving building pad areas shall be 15 percent. In hillside areas driveway grades exceeding 10 percent shall have parking landings with a minimum 16 feet deep and shall not exceed five (5) percent grade or as required by the City Engineer. Driveways with a slope of 15 percent shall incorporate grooves for traction into the driveway as required by the City Engineer. 11. At the time of submittal of the 40 -scale grading plan for plan check, a detailed soils and geology report shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval. Said report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer and/or geologist licensed by the State of California. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a detailed geotechnical investigation will be required to evaluate the site conditions with respect to the proposed development and provide geotechnical recommendations for design and construction of the proposed improvements. 12. The detailed geotechnical investigation shall address the review comments by the City's Geotechnical Engineering Consultant, Leighton and Associates dated August 23, 2013, and September 17, 2013, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 13. Rough and Precise grading plans shall be designed in compliance with the recommendations of the final detailed soils and engineering geology reports. All remedial earthwork specified in the final report shall be incorporated into the grading plans. Grading plans shall be signed and stamped by a California Registered Civil Engineer, registered Geotechnical Engineer and registered Engineering Geologist and approved by the City Engineer. 14, A Low Impact Development (LID) Plan conforming to the 2012 MS4 Permit issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region Order No. R4-2012-0175, on November 08, 2012 shall be submitted for review and approval as deemed necessary and may be required to be incorporated into the grading, storm drain and street improvement plans to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. All review comments by the City's Water Quality Consultant, John L. Hunter and Associates, dated August 13, 2013, shall be addressed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 15. A separate Low Impact Development (LID) Plan conforming to the 2012 MS4 Permit issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region Order No. R4-2012-0175, on November 08, 2012 shall be submitted for review and approval and may be required to be incorporated into the grading, storm drain and street improvement plans to the satisfaction of the City Engineer for any and all park improvements. 16. An erosion control plan shall be approved by the City Engineer. Erosion control plans shall be made in accordance to the City's NPDES requirements. A 33 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX separate Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is required. Grading permits will not be issued until approval of the SWPPP and the associated WDID Number have been issued by the State Regional Water Quality Control Board. 17. All slopes shall be seeded per landscape plan and/or fuel modification plan with native grasses or planted with ground cover, shrubs, and trees for erosion control upon completion of grading or some other alternative method of erosion control shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and a permanent irrigation system shall be installed per the City's Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. 18. Submit a stockpile plan showing the proposed location for stockpile for grading export materials, and the route of transport. 19. Prepare a horizontal control plan and submit concurrently with the grading plan for review and approval. 20. Prior to commencing any grading activities, a pre -construction meeting must be held at the project site with the grading contractor, geotechnical engineer applicant, and city grading inspector and engineers and City building inspector at least 48 hours prior to commencing grading operations. 21. Rough grade certifications by project soils and civil engineers and a geotechnical as -graded report shall be submitted prior to issuance of building permits for any residential structure. Retaining wall permits may be issued concurrently with the grading permits. 22. Retaining wall permits shall be obtained from the Building and Safety Division. 23. Final grade certifications by project soils engineer and civil engineers shall be submitted to the Public Works/Engineering Department prior to the issuance of any project final inspections/certificate of occupancy. 24. Precise grading plans for Lots 62 and 63, to be dedicated to the City as a public park, shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval. A separate grading permit will be required for precise grading activities on Lots 62 and 63. 1. All terrace drains and drainage channels shall be constructed in muted earth tones so as not to impart adverse visual impacts. Terrace drains shall follow landform slope conf'iguru,Jon and shall not be placed in an exposed positions. All down drains shall be hidden in swales diagonally or curvilinear across a slope face. 2. All storm drain improvements shall be installed and accepted by the City prior to issuance of building permits, for construction upon any parcel that may be 34 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX subject to drainage flows entering, leaving, or within a parcel relative to which a building permit is requested. 3. Prior to placement of any dredged or fill material into any U.S.G.S. blue line stream bed, a 404 pen -nit shall be obtained from the Army Corps of Engineers and an agreement with the California Department of Fish and Game shall be obtained and submitted to the City Engineer, 4. All identified flood hazard locations within the project boundaries which cannot be mitigated as approved by the City Engineer shall be shown on the final map and delineated as "Flood Hazard Area." 5. Storm drainage facilities shall be constructed within the street right-of-way or in easements satisfactory to the City Engineer and dedicated to the Home Owners Association (HOA). 6. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a complete hydrology and hydraulic study shall be prepared by a Civil Engineer registered in the State of California to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 7. All storm drain plans shall comply with the approved Low Impact Development (LID) Plan to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 8. Connection to any Los Angeles County Facility will require Los Angeles County approval. All approvals and any associated permits from the County shall be submitted to the City prior to approval of any storm drain improvements plans. 9. Grading and coverage of the drainage channel on Lot 63 will require approval from the Los Angeles County Flood Control District. Permits for work within Lot 63 will not be issued without written approval from LACFCD. 10. A comprehensive Operations & Maintenance (O&M) plan/program shall be submitted concurrently with the storm drain plans to the Public Works/Engineering Department for review and approval to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The O&M Plan/Program shall be included in the CC&R's as a responsibility of the HOA. 11. Easements for ingress/egress and maintenance purposes shall be reserved on the final map for the maintenance responsibilities by the HOA of the inlet structure to the detention basin/public park area. 1. The applicant shall replace and record any centerline ties and monuments that are removed as part of this construction with the Los Angeles County Public Works Survey Division. 2. Street improvement plans in a 24" x 36" sheet format, prepared by a registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. 35 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX Streets shall not exceed a maximum slope of 12 percent. All street improvement plans shall conform to the approved Low Impact Development (LID) Plan to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 3. New street centerline monuments shall be set at the intersections of two or more streets, intersections of two or more streets, intersections of streets with tract boundaries and to mark the beginning and ending of curves or the points of intersection of tangents thereof. Survey notes showing the ties between all monuments set and four (4) durable reference points for each shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval, prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. 4. The design and construction of private street improvements shall be set to City and County standards and designed to a design speed of 20 mph and all streets shall be posted at 15 mph speed limit with the concurrence of the applicant's traffic engineer. 5. Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy, applicant shall construct base pavement for all streets in accordance with soils report prepared by a California registered soils engineer and approved by the City Engineer or as otherwise directed by the City Engineer. 6. All improvements identified for the project along Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Blvd. shall be designed and constructed per the recommendations of the approved Traffic Impact Analysis dated July 18, 2013, Development Agreement dated April 20, 2012, and any associated amendments as well as City Standards. 7. All dedications of roadways shall be made and accepted by the City Council upon completion of the improvements and prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy. 8. Separate street improvement plans for Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Blvd. shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer. Improvement plans shall include details for street improvements, signal improvements/modifications, striping, landscape and any associated utility adjustments required as a result of the new right-of-way width. 9. Median reconstruction and landscape design along Diamond Bar Blvd. shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department and Community Services Department and shall be designed in accordance with all applicable City Standards, 10. Separate encroachment permits shall be obtained from the Public Works Department for any improvements made along Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Blvd. 36 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX 11. All streetscape improvements including parkway landscape along Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Blvd. shall be in accordance with the City's Streetscape Design Guidelines. 12. Upon completion of the construction of public right-of-way improvements, review of the roadway conditions will be warranted by the Public Works Department. Any damages to the roadway will be required to be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Engineer at the applicant's cost. At a minimum a type II slurry seal (in accordance with City specifications) and complete re -stripe of the roadway from the center of the roadway to the edge of gutter along the project frontage for Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Blvd. will be required. 13. All legal lots/parcels legally subdivided by Vesting Tentative Tract flap 72295 shall be annexed into citywide Landscape Assessment District #38. 14. Improvements along Pasado Drive shall include the dedication of the cul-de-sac to the City of Diamond Bar, reconstruction of an ADA compliant sidewalk, parkway landscape, and reconstruction of the cul-de-sac as deemed necessary to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 15. Improvements along Castle Rock Drive shall include the reconstruction of an ADA compliant sidewalk, parkway landscape, and reconstruction of the cul-de- sac as deemed necessary to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, E. UTILITIES 1. Easements, satisfactory to the City Engineer and the utility companies, for public utility and public services purposes shall be offered and shown on the detailed site plan and final map as deemed appropriate. 2. Prior to final map approval, a water system with appurtenant facilities to serve all lots/parcels in the land division, designed to the Walnut Valley Water District (WVWD) specifications, shall be provided. The system shall include fire hydrants of the type and location as determined by the Los Angeles County Fire Department. The water mains shall be sized to accommodate the total domestic and fire flows to the satisfaction of the WVWD and Fire Department. 3. Prior to final map approval, the applicant shall construct or enter into an improvement agreement with the City guaranteeing construction of the necessary improvements to the existing water system according to Walnut Valley Water District (WVWD) specifications to accommodate the total domestic and fire flows as may be required by the WVWD and Fire Department. 4. Applicant shall relocate and underground any existing on-site utilities to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the respective utility owner. 5. The power poles and guy poles along the project frontage on Diamond Bar Blvd. and Brea Canyon Road shall be eliminated and the facilities located underground. 37 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX 6. Underground utilities shall not be constructed within the drip line of any mature tree except as approved by a registered arborist. 7. Applicant shall construct street lights on the length of the project frontage along Diamond Bar Blvd. and Brea Canyon Road, as required, per Los Angeles County Standards and as approved by the City Engineer. The street lights shall be annexed into the Los Angeles County Lighting Maintenance District 10006 and Los Angeles County Lighting District LLA -1 (Diamond Bar Zone). Approval from the County on the street light design shall be obtained prior to approval of any roadway improvement plans for Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Blvd, 8. Applicant shall design and construct street lights within the tract boundaries per City Standards and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. In -tract street lights will be the responsibility of the HOA to own, operate and maintain. 9. Electrical transformers, water meters and any other utility facilities to be constructed within the street right-of-way (public or private) landscape area will require approval of the location/placement within said right-of-way by the Community Development Director. 1. Applicant shall construct a sanitary sewer system in accordance with the approved Sewer System Analysis dated September 24, 2013, and all associated amendments to the satisfaction of the City Engineer which verifies that capacity is available in the existing sewage system to be used as the outfall for the sewers in this subdivision. If the existing system including the Castle Rock and Fountain Springs Pump Stations are found to be of insufficient capacity, the deficiencies shall be resolved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 2. Each dwelling unit shall be served by a separate sewer lateral which shall not cross any other lot lines. The sanitary sewer mainline system serving the tract shall be connected to the City sewer system. Said system shall be of the size, grade and depth approved by the City Engineer, County Sanitation District and Los Angeles County Public Works and surety shall be provided and an agreement executed prior to approval of the final map if improvements are not constructed. 3. Applicant shall obtain connection permit(s) from the City. The project shall be annexed into the County Consolidated Sewer Maintenance District and appropriate easements for all sewer main lines shall be shown on the final map and offered for dedication on the final map. 4. Applicant, at applicant's sole cost and expense, shall construct the sewer system in accordance with the City, Los Angeles County Public Works Department and County Sanitation District Standards prior to occupancy. 38 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX 5. A fair share payment in the amount of $78,081.60 (based on a 15% impact to the Emergency Storage Capacity at the Castle Rock Pump Station as indicated in the Sewer and Water System Analysis dated September 24, 2013) and $29,438.71 (based on a 3.6% impact to the Emergency Storage Capacity at the Fountain Springs Pump Station as indicated in the Sewer and Water System Analysis dated September 24, 2013) shall be accepted by the City prior to the issuance of the final sewer inspection sign off and sewer improvement bond release. Rvmnm��� 1. All traffic mitigations shall be implemented and constructed in accordance with the Traffic Impact Analysis dated July 18, 2013, and conditions of project approval for the VTTM 72295 prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. 2. A fair share payment in the amount of $154,730.00 as identified in the Traffic Impact Analysis, dated July 18, 2013, shall be accepted by the City prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy. 3. Any changes to the proposed parking lot layout on Lot 63 from the layout shown in the Traffic Impact Analysis dated July 18, 2013, will require an amendment to the TIA and additional line of sight analysis. 1. Plans shall conform to current State and Local Building Code requirements and all other applicable construction codes, ordinances and regulations in effect at the time of plan check submittal. Work shall be in conformance to the adopted code at the time of submittal. 2. Provisions for Cal Green shall be implemented onto plans and certification provided by a third party as required by the Building Division. Specific water, waste, low VOC, and related conservation measures shall be shown on plans. 3. Fire sprinklers are required for new single family dwellings (CRC R313.2). 4. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been met. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 5. Every permit issued by the Building and Safety Division shall expire if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit or work has discontinued and not been signed -off on the job card by the building inspector. 39 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX 6. Construction activities causing the operation of any tools or equipment used in construction, drilling, repair, alteration, or demolition work shall be conducted Monday — Saturday between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. 7. The project shall be protected by a construction fence to the satisfaction of the Building Official. All fencing shall be view obstructing with opaque surfaces. 8. All structures and property shall be maintained in a safe and clean manner during construction. The property shall be free of debris, trash, and weeds. 9. All equipment staging areas shall be maintained in an orderly manner and screened behind a minimum 6' high fence. 10. Solid waste management of construction material shall incorporate recycling material collection per Diamond Bar Municipal Code 8.16 of Title 8. 11. The minimum design load for wind in this area is 85 M.P.H. exposures "C" and the site is within seismic zone D or E. The applicant shall submit drawings and calculations prepared by a California State licensed Architect/Engineer with wet stamp and signature. 12. This project shall comply with the energy conservation requirements of the State of California Energy Commission. All lighting shall be high efficacy or equivalent per the current California Energy Code 119 and 150(k). 13. Indoor air quality shall be provided consistent with ASHRAE 62.2 as required per California Energy Code 150(0). 14. This project shall comply with all Accessibility Code requirements of California Building Code Chapter 11A for all units that are considered "covered multifamily dwelling units" per CBC 1104A. 15. Where sales trailers or temporary offices used by the public are provided, accessible design is required and a separate permit is required. 16. Submit Public Works Department approved grading plans showing clearly all finish elevations, drainage, and retaining walls locations. 17. "Separate permits are required for fountains, retaining walls, fences over 6' in height, common use facilities, and entry monuments" and shall be noted on plans. 18. A height and setback survey will be required at completion of framing and foundations respectively. Location of new homes shall be staked in the field by the surveyor. 19. Prior to Building permit issuance, all school district fees must be paid. Please obtain a form from the Building and Safety Division to take directly to the school district. 40 City Council Resolution No. 2013 XX 20. Indicate all easements on the site plan. 21. LA County Fire approval is required. Contact Fire Department for requirements pertaining to access, fire flow, etc. 22. All retaining walls shall be submitted to the Building and Safety and Public Work Departments for review and approval. 23. Submit grading plans showing clearly all finish elevations, drainage, and retaining wall locations. No building permits shall be issued prior to submitting a pad certification. 24. The project shall be protected by a construction fence and shall comply with the NPDES & BMP requirements (sand bags, etc.) 25. Check drainage patterns with Engineering Department. Surface water shall drain away from building at a 2% minimum slope. 26. Specify location of tempered glass as required by code. 27. Specify 1/4"/ft slope for all flat surfaces/ decks with approved water proofing material. Also, provide guardrail connection detail (height, spacing, etc.) 28. Special inspections and structural observation will be required in conformance to CBC 1704 to 1709. 29. A soils report is required and all recommendations of the soils report shall be adhered to. 30. Slope setbacks consistent with California Building Code Figure 1805.3.1 and California Residential Code R403.1.7. Foundations shall provide a minimum distance to daylight. 31. The applicant shall contact Dig Alert and have underground utility locations marked by the utility companies prior to any excavation. Contact Dig Alert by dialing 811 or their website at wvAv.digalert.orq. 32. The location of property lines and building pad may require a survey. 33. All workers on the job shall be covered by workman's compensation insurance under a licensed general contractor. 34. Any changes to approved plans during the course of construction shall be approved by the City prior to proceeding with any work. 35. MSE walls shall be designed based on a specific geotechnical report identifying the design criteria for this specific project. 41 - - City Council Resolution No. 2013 XX 36. Accessible paths of travel are required from accessible spaces to the entrances of accessible units. 37. Limits of the MSE wall mesh/grid system shall be shown on the grading plan showing areas that shall not be interrupted where the mesh/grid system is in- place. 38. Plan 2 for the 60x70 lots shall be designed as a two-family dwelling per CRC 302.3 with a fire and sound -rated separation between each combination considered a dwelling unit as defined per CBC 202. 39. At least 10% of condo units in carriage type units shall be accessible as required per CBC 1102A.3 for visitability requirements. 40. Phasing of construction shall be approved by the Community Development Director. Phasing shall be designed to prevent "spot building" (scattered construction of structures) from occurring. Otherwise, a construction staging plan shall be provided and approved by Community Development Director to show how the "spot building" will protect the safety of new owners adjacent to construction. 41. The Building Code edition that permits will be based on will follow the date of building plan check submittal and shall be valid for 180 -days. Permits filed after 180 -days from the plan check submittal date shall meet the Building Code edition in effect at the time of permit issuance. If plans are submitted for Building plan check after January 1, 2014, the 2013 California Building Code will apply including the following: 42. Solar ready roofs shall be provided and laid out in conformance with the California Energy Code Section 110.10. This item may be based on the tentative subdivision map approval. 43. Water heater pipe insulation is required per California Energy Code 150.0(j)2 with insulation consistent with California Energy Code Table 120.3-A. 44. Field verification of AC units are required to meet energy efficiency requirements outlined in California Energy Code 150.1(b)4. 45. A whole house fan is required per California Energy Code 150.1(c)12. 1. Access shall comply with Section 503 of the Fire Code, which requires all weather access. All weather access may require paving. 42 City Council ResoluCion No. 2013 -XX 2. Fire Department Access shall be extended to within 150 feet distance of any exterior portion of all structures. 3. Where driveways extend further than 150 feet and are of single access design, turnarounds suitable for fire protection equipment use shall be provided and shown on the final map. Turnarounds shall be designed, constructed and maintained to insure their integrity for Fire Department use. Where topography dictates, turnarounds shall be provided for driveways that extend over 150 feet in length. 4. Private driveways shall be indicated on the final map as 'Private Driveway and Firelane" with the widths clearly depicted and shall be maintained in accordance with the Fire Code. All required fire hydrants shall be installed, tested and accepted prior to construction. S. Vehicular access must be provided and maintained serviceable throughout construction to all required fire hydrants. All require fire hydrants shall be installed, tested and accepted priorto construction. 6. Provide Fire Department or City approved street signs and building access number prior to occupancy. 7. The final map shall be submitted to our office for review and approval prior recordation. 1. Provide water mains, fire hydrants and fire flows as required by the County of Los Angeles Fire Department, for all land shown on map which shall be recorded. 2. The required fire flow for public fire hydrants at this location is 3500 gallons per minute at 20 psi for a duration of 3 hours, over and above maximum daily domestic demand. 3 hydrant(s) flowing simultaneously may be used to achieve the required fire flow. 3. Fire hydrant requirements are as follows: Install 11 public fire hydrants and upgrade/verify 1 existing public fire hydrant. 4. All hydrants shall measure 6"x 4"x 21/2" brass or bronze, conforming to current AWWA standard C503 or approved equal. All on-site hydrants shall be installed a minimum of 25 feet from a structure or protected by a two (2) hour rated firewall ® Location: As per map on file with the office. 5. All required fire hydrants shall be installed, tested and accepted or bonded for prior to Final Map approval. Vehicular access shall be provided and maintained serviceable throughout construction. 43 - City Council Resolution No. 2013 XX 6. Additional water system requirements will be required when this land is further subdivided and/or during the building permit process. 7. All proposed structures shall be equipped with automatic fire sprinkler, systems that are designed and maintain in accordance with NFPA 13. 8. Additional water requirements will be determined by the Fire Prevention Engineering Unit at further development of the site. IM 44 City Council Resolution No. 2013-X "Site Y Specific Pian City of Diamond Bar, California Table A-2 VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MBAR NO. 72295 REVISED MITIGATION REPORTING AND MONITORING PROGRAM Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 September 2012 Addendum No. 1: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72296 Page 44 Compliance Mitigation No, i Mitigation Measure - Verification Milestone Hydrology and Water Quality Prior to the issuance of grading permits, all drainage facilities and improvements shall be subject to final design City Issuance of 1 and engineering review and approval by the City Engineer and, for those storm drain facilities under County Engineer Grading jurisdiction, by the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW) (Mitigation Measure 4-1). Permits Biological Resources In order to reduce impacts to United States Army Corps of Engineers and Regional Water Quality Control Board (ACOE/RWQCB) and California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) jurisdictional waters, priorto the issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director, receipt of any discretionary permits and approval as may be required from the ACOE, RWQCB, and Community Issuance of 2 CDFG and commit to the provision of compensatory jurisdictional resources meeting or exceeding the following Development Grading minimal standards: (1) the on-site and/or off-site replacement of ACOE/RWQCB jurisdictional waters and Director Permits wetlands at a 2:1 ratio; (2) the on-site and/or off-site replacement of CDFG jurisdictional streambed and associated riparian habitat at a 2:1 ratio; and (3) the incorporation of design features into the project's design and development enhancing the site's biological resources (Mitigation Measure 5-1). Traffic and Circulation Prior to the recordation of the final tract map or issuance of occupancy permits for any residential development, as determined by the City Engineer, the Applicant shall complete, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, those street and intersection improvements identified in the traffic impact analysis or any supplement thereto, provide a Final Tract Map .. bond or other acceptable instruct committing to those improvements, and/or provide a "fair -share' contribution Recordation toward the cost of the improvements to the following intersections: (1) Brea Canyon Road at Pathfinder Road; (2) City or 3oai Diamond Bar Boulevard at Pathfinder Road; (3) Bea_ L3) Diamond Bar Engineer Issuance of cRe Boulevard at Cold Spring Lane; (5)(41 Pathfinder Road at Brea Canyon Cutoff; (S) (5) SR -57 SB Ramps at Brea Occupancy Canyon Cutoff, (74 n. SR -57 NB Ramps at Brea Canyon Cutoff; {94 M Brea Canyon Road at Diamond Bar Permits Boulevard; (9) (8) Crooked Creek or Cherrydale Drive at Diamond Bar Boulevard, (19) a Brea Canyon Road at Silver Bullet Drive; (41)(1 Diamond Bar Boulevard at Grand Avenue; and Colima Road at Brea Canyon Cutoff (Mitigation Measure 6-1). The final site plan shall include and accommodate those traffic measures, improvements, and such other City Site Plan 4 pertinent factors and/or facilities as may be identified by the City Engineer to ensure the safe and efficient Engineer Approval movement of project -related traffic (Mitigation Measure 6-2). Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 September 2012 Addendum No. 1: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72296 Page 44 "Site D" Specific Plan City of Diamond Bar, California Table A-2 (Continued) VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 72299 RF:V1SEi7 MITIGATION REPORTING AND MONITORING PROGRAM Mitigation Measure Final Environmental impact Report, SCH 2008021014 September 2012 Addendum No. 1: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295 Page 45 Compliance Mitigation No. Miti 9 Verification Milestone Air Quality Site watering shall be conducted a minimum of three times daily during site preparation activities within disturbed Building Construction 5 areas lacking ground coverage (Mitigation Measure 7-1). Inspector Term Noise In accordance with the Development Code, construction shall be restricted to between the hours of 7:00 AM and &-99 7:00 PM on weekdays and Saturdays. No construction shall occur at any time on Sundays or on federal 6 holidays. These days and hours shall also apply any servicing of equipment and to the delivery of construction materials to or from the site (Mitigation Measure 8-1). Building Construction 7 All construction equipment shall be properly maintained and tuned to minimize noise emissions -(Mitigation Measure 8-2). Inspector Term 8 All equipment shall be fitted with properly operating mufflers, air intake silencers, and engine shrouds no less effective than originally equipped (Mitigation Measure 8-3). The construction contractor shall place temporary noise barriers along the site perimeter when doing any work 9 within 100 feet of any existing residential units. Where feasible, such barriers shall attempt to block the line of sight between the residents and construction equipment (Mitigation Measure 8-4). The construction contractor shall specify the use of electric stationary equipment (e.g., compressors) that can City 10 - operate off the power grid where feasible. Where infeasible, stationary noise sources (e.g., generators and Engineer g Building Permit compressors) shall be located as far from residential receptor locations as is feasible (Mitigation Measure 8-5). Issuance Construction shall be subject to any and all provisions set forth by the City of Diamond Bar Planning Department Planning 11 (Mitigation Measure 8-6). Manager residential units shall be located within 830 feet of the SR -57 Freeway's nearest travel lane unless additional 12No sound attention is provided to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director (Mitigation Measure 8-7). Community Development Director Final Tract Map Recordation No residential units shall be located within 130 feet of the centerline of Diamond Bar Boulevard unless additional 13 sound attention is provided to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director (Mitigation Measure 8-8). Final Environmental impact Report, SCH 2008021014 September 2012 Addendum No. 1: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295 Page 45 "Site D" Specific Plano City of Diamond Bar, California Table A-2 (Continued) VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 72295 REVISED MITIGATION REPORTING AND MONITORING PROGRAM Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 September 2012 Addendum No. 1: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295 - Page 46 Compliance Mitigation No. Mitigation Measure Verification Milestone Cultural Resources Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a qualified archaeologist shall be retained by the Applicant and Community approved by the City to monitor all vegetation removal and ground disturbance to a depth of three feet within the Development following portions of the study area: (1) the boundary of SD -Cultural -1; (2) the open valley floor adjacent to SD- Director Issuance of 14 Cultural -1; and (3) the riparian areas that were not previously surveyed due to dense vegetation cover. The and Grading archaeologist will determine if additional monitoring below the depth of three feet is warranted based on soil and city Permits bedrock conditions and presence/absence of archaeological materials. No archaeological monitoring is required Engineer for ground disturbing activities outside of these monitor areas (Mitigation Measure 11-1). If cultural resources are identified during monitoring of the ground disturbing activities, the archaeologist shall be allowed to temporarily divert or redirect grading or excavation activities in the vicinity of those resources in order to make an evaluation of the find and determine appropriate treatment. Treatment will include the goals of preservation where practicable and public interpretation of historic and archaeological resources. All cultural resources recovered will be documented on California Department of Parks and Recreation Site Forms to be filed with the CHRIS-SCCIC. The archaeologist shall prepare a final report about the monitoring to be filed with the Applicant, the City, and the California Historical Resources Information System South Central Coastal Information 15 Center at the California State University, Fullerton (CHRIS-SCCIC), as required by the California Office of Historic Preservation. The report shall include documentation and interpretation of resources recovered, if any. Interpretation will include full evaluation of the eligibility of SD -Cultural -1 with respect to the California Register of Historic Places and CEQA. The report shall also include all specialists' reports as appendices. The City shall designate repositories in the event that significant resources are recovered. If cultural resources are identified Building Construction during ground disturbing activities that occur outside the designated monitoring area, ground disturbing activities Inspector Term shall be temporarily redirected away from the vicinity of the find until the retained archaeologist is notified by the Applicant. The archaeologist shall coordinate with the Applicant as to the immediate treatment of the find until a proper site visit and evaluation is made by the archaeologist (Mitigation Measure 11-2). If human remains are encountered unexpectedly during construction excavation and grading activities, Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 requires that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin and disposition pursuant to Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources 16 Code. If the remains are determined to be of Native American descent, the County Coroner has 24 hours to notify the California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). The NAHC will then identify the person(s) thought to be the Most Likely Descendent of the deceased Native American, who will then help determine what course of action should be taken in dealing with the remains (Mitigation Measure 11-3). Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 September 2012 Addendum No. 1: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295 - Page 46 "Site Y Specific Pilan City of Diamond Bar, California Table A-2 (Continued) VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 72295 RFVISED MITIGATION REPORTING AND MONITORING PROGRAM Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 September 2012 Addendum No. 1: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295 Page 47 Compliance Mitigation No. Mitigation Measure Verification Milestone Cultural Resources (Continued) Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a qualified paleontologist meeting the qualifications established by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontologists shall be retained by the Applicant and approved by the City to develop and Community 17 implement a paleontological monitoring plan. Development of the monitoring plan shall include a site visit by the Development paleontologist prior to initiation of project development in order to determine or delineate sensitive areas. The Director Issuance of paleontologist may also perform collections of fossils from the surface and near -surface (Mitigation Measure 11- Grading 4). Permits The paleontologist shall attend a pre -grade meeting in order to become familiar with the proposed depths and City 18 patterns of grading of the study area (Mitigation Measure 11-5). Engineer The paleontologist shall establish a curation agreement with an accredited facility prior to grading permit issuance City Issuance suance of 19 (Mitigation Measure 11-6). Engineer Permits A paleontological monitor, supervised by the paleontologist, shall monitor all excavations in the Puente Formation or excavations anticipated to extend into the Puente Formation. If fossils are found during ground -disturbing Building Construction 20 activities, the paleontological monitor shall be empowered to halt the ground -disturbing activities within 25 feet of Inspector Term the find in order to allow evaluation of the find and determination of appropriate treatment (Mitigation Measure 11- 7). The paleontologist shall prepare a final report on the monitoring. If fossils were identified, the report shall contain Community 21 an appropriate description of the fossils, treatment, and curation. A copy of the report shall be filed with the City Development Grading and the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and shall accompany any curated fossils (Mitigation Director Sign -Off Measure 11-8). Aesthetics All pole -mounted or wall -mounted luminaires installed for the purpose of illuminating homes, public park areas, private roadways, and driveways shall conform to appropriate lighting standards and demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, that light trespass will not exceed 0.5 horizontal foot candle, as measured at the City Building Permit 22 project boundaries abutting any existing residential use. These standards shall not be applied to any public Engineer Issuance streets or to any entry feature or other City -oriented signage to be constructed on or adjacent to the project site (Mitigation Measure 12-1). Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 September 2012 Addendum No. 1: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295 Page 47 Use Agreement No(s) Proiect Name -y ` a Parcel(s) E-- '- � ROW Map No(s) APN: T.G.: ` 2 Supervisorial District USE AGREEMENT This Use Agreement is entered into by and between the LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, a body corporate and politic, herein referred to as "DISTRICT" and USER's name herein referred to as "USER" RECITALS Attachment 2 The DISTRICT owns fee title to portions of tie rzcore�taa generally located 1WE in the City off or Unincorporated area — _ R:, w, State of California and, as more particularly shown on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and made a part hereof, hereafter referred to as PREMISES ; and USER proposes to use a portion of PREMISES, for :t`:pubtie=.fee`rett?if V s purposes, in connection with the USER's project known as the (the "Project"); and USER proposes to but not limited to on PREMISES in connection with the Project, includi as shown on Exhibit B, hereafter referred to as NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of these recitals and the faithful performance by USER and DISTRICT of the mutual covenants herein contained, for the 1 period, of time herein set forth, the DISTRICT and USER hereto mutually agree as follows: SECTION 1. Authorized Use 1.1. USER is authorized and permitted to use PREMISES for the a4nstructton' pail rcxrtattenand " and use of IMPROVEMENTS in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Use Agreement. Any other use of PREMISES by USER is expressly prohibited. 1.2. USER's use of the PREMISES shall be subordinate to the primary uses and purposes of the PREMISES for watershed management, including flood control, water conservation, and water quality purposes, by DISTRICT and others (pursuant to DISTRICT's permission), and USER's use of the PREMISES shall at no time interfere with the use of PREMISES or the use of DISTRICT's adjacent property and/or improvements for such purposes. 1.3 District has only easement rights] 1.4 This Use Agreement is valid only to the extent of DISTRICT'S jurisdiction. Acquisition of permits required by other affected agencies and the consent of underlying fee owner(s) other than DISTRICT'S, if any, are the responsibility of the USER. SECTION 2. Construction and Maintenance of Improvements 2.1. USER understands and acknowledges that it is required to comply with the requirements set forth in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the State CEQA guidelines prior to implementing IMPROVEMENTS and that USER shall be the lead agency with respect to any and all CEQA compliance related to the IMPROVEMENTS. In addition to its other indemnification obligations as specified below, USER hereby agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless DISTRICT and COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES and their elected and appointed officers, employees, and agents from and against any and all claims and/or actions related to the IMPROVEMENTS that may be asserted by any third party or 2 public agency alleging violations of CEQA or the CEQA Guidelines or the National Environmental Policy Act. 2.2. USER shall bear all costs in connection with the construction of the IMPROVEMENTS, including preparation of plans and specifications and all construction costs and expenses. 2.3. Prior to commencement of any construction activity on PREMISES by or on behalf of USER, USER shall submit the plans and specification for the IMPROVEMENTS to, and shall apply for and obtain a permit from, the Land Development Division, Subdivision and Permits Unit, of the County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works. USER shall also obtain DISTRICT's prior written approval should USER propose to make any changes to the approved plans and specifications. 2.4. Upon completion of the construction of the IMPROVEMENTS, USER shall provide DISTRICT with approved As -Built plans. 2.5. USER shall keep, inspect, and maintain the PREMISES and the IMPROVEMENTS in a safe, clean, and orderly condition at all times during the term of this Use Agreement and shall not permit trash and debris, including but not limited to rubbish, tin cans, bottles, and garbage to accumulate at any time, nor shall USER commit, suffer, or permit any waste on the PREMISES or IMPROVEMENTS or permit any acts to be done in violation of any laws or ordinances thereon. 2.6. USER shall remove graffiti from the PREMISES and IMPROVEMENTS and any walls, fences, and signs, which are located within the PREMISES, anytime graffiti is discovered by USER or anytime USER is notified by DISTRICT. Graffiti must be removed within the following guidelines: 2.6.1 Remove vulgar graffiti (i.e., profane, obscene, or racist) within 24 hours, Monday through Friday. 2.6.2 Remove other graffiti within 72 hours, Monday through Friday. 2.7. USER shall replace or repair any property of DISTRICT that becomes damaged by USER or any person entering the PREMISES at USER's invitation or with the consent of the USER, either expressed or implied, within a reasonable time to the satisfaction of the DISTRICT or shall compensate the DISTRICT for the damage within thirty (30) days of the USER's receipt of an invoice from DISTRICT. 2.8 USER shall close all gates and take all actions necessary to render the PREMISES inaccessible to public access in the event USER abandons its operation and maintenance of the IMPROVEMENTS or when the weather 9 forecast for the next 24-hour period is for one (1) inch of rain or more, or when notified by the DISTRICT. SECTION 3. Term 3.1. The term of this Use Agreement shall be for "�rtty f+ fes% �I Trria1' subject to the DISTRICT's right to terminate USER's use as provided for in Section 4, below. 3.2 This Use Agreement shall expire at the end of the Initial Term provided, however, that DISTRICT may extend the term of this Use Agreement beyond the Initial Term, subject to such terms and conditions as it deems appropriate, upon receipt of a written request from USER no earlier than twelve (12) months or later than six (6) months prior to the end of the Initial Term. SECTION 4. Termination of Use 4.1. DISTRICT shall have the right to cancel this Use Agreement and terminate USER's use of PREMISES, pursuant to this Use Agreement, by giving USER at least ninety (90) days prior written notice under the following conditions: 4.1.1. DISTRICT proposes to implement a project on, or including, the PREMISES for watershed management purposes, including flood control, water conservation, and water quality; and 4.1.2. DISTRICT determines, in good faith, that the IMPROVEMENTS and/or USER's use of the PREMISES, or any of them, would be substantially incompatible with the proposed project; and 4.1.3. DISTRICT has notified USER of the basis for DISTRICT's determination that a substantial incompatibility will exist and has provided USER with a reasonable opportunity to propose modifications to the IMPROVEMENTS or USER's use of the PREMISES that will eliminate the incompatibility. 4.2. DISTRICT shall have the right to cancel this Use Agreement and terminate USER's use of PREMISES by giving USER at least 60 days prior written notice, if USER breaches any term or condition of this Use Agreement. 4.3 DISTRICT shall have the right to cancel this Use Agreement and terminate USER'S use of the PREMISES if construction of the IMPROVEMENTS has not been completed within five (5) years from the date this Use Agreement is fully executed. CI 4.4. DISTRICT shall have the right to immediately cancel and terminate USER's use of PREMISES, pursuant to this Use Agreement or, in the DISTRICT's sole discretion, to temporarily suspend such use in the event DISTRICT determines, in good faith, that it is necessary for DISTRICT to enter and take exclusive possession of PREMISES in order to respond to an emergency, as defined in Public Contract Code Section 1102. In the event of an emergency, USER shall bear any expenses associated with the cessation of such use, and shall have no rights or claims therefore against DISTRICT. 4.5. USER shall have the right to cancel and terminate its use of PREMISES, pursuant to this Use Agreement, for any reason by giving DISTRICT at least sixty (60) days prior written notice. SECTION 5. Removal of Improvements and Restoration of Premises 5.1. Upon the expiration or sooner termination of this Use Agreement, USER shall, at its own expense, remove the IMPROVEMENTS and restore the PREMISES, to a condition similar to or better than that which existed on the effective date of this Use Agreement, reasonable wear and tear excepted. 5.2 Prior to commencing the removal of the IMPROVEMENTS, or any of them, USER shall apply for and obtain a permit therefore, from the Land Development Division, Subdivision and Permits Unit, of the County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works. 5.3. If USER fails to remove the IMPROVEMENTS and restore the PREMISES within ninety (90) days of the expiration of this Use Agreement or sooner termination of USER's use of PREMISES, pursuant to this Use Agreement, DISTRICT may remove the IMPROVEMENTS. 5.4. If DISTRICT removes the IMPROVEMENTS pursuant to Subsection 5.3, DISTRICT shall submit a billing invoice to USER indicating the costs and expenses incurred by DISTRICT in connection with the removal of the IMPROVEMENTS and USER shall reimburse DISTRICT all such costs and expenses for removing said IMPROVEMENTS within thirty (30) days of the billing invoice. SECTION 6. Miscellaneous Terms and Conditions 6.1. Indemnification only if the USER is the state, a city, a public authority, or public agency] 5 6.1.1.1. USER shall indemnify, defend, and hold DISTRICT and the County of Los Angeles and their respective officers, employees, and agents harmless from, and against, any claims, demands, liability, damages, costs, and expenses, including, without limitation, involving bodily injury, death, or personal injury of any person or property damage of any nature whatsoever, arising from, or related to, the construction, reconstruction, maintenance, operation, or removal of the IMPROVEMENTS or USER's use of the PREMISES. 6.1.1.2. DISTRICT shall indemnify, defend, and hold USER and its officers, employees and agents harmless from and against, any claims, demands, liability, damages, costs, and expenses including, without limitation, involving bodily injury, death, or personal injury of any person or property damage of any nature whatsoever, arising from or related to the construction, reconstruction, maintenance, operation, or removal of any improvements constructed or maintained by DISTRICT on, above, or under the PREMISES or arising from any and all uses of the PREMISES by DISTRICT. 6.1.2. USER releases DISTRICT and waives all rights to damages for any loss, costs, or expenses USER may sustain as a result of any damage to, or destruction of, the IMPROVEMENTS or to the PREMISES attributable to DISTRICT's watershed management activities, including any flood control, water conservation or water quality activities on, or adjacent to, the PREMISES, or attributable to any flooding caused by inadequacy or failure of DISTRICT's facilities, except to the extent caused by the DISTRICT'S negligence or willful misconduct. 6.1.3. Each party to this Use Agreement shall include the other within the protection of any indemnification clause contained in any ancillary contract relating to the PREMISES. 6.2. Without limiting USER's indemnification of the DISTRICT, USER shall procure and maintain, in full force and effect during the term of this Use Agreement, insurance policies providing for the following insurance coverage: ■ Comprehensive general liability and property damage coverage with a combined single limit liability in the amount of not less than TWO MILLION DOLLARS ($3,000,000) per occurrence. A ■ Worker's Compensation coverage in such amount as will fully comply with the laws of the State of California and which shall indemnify, insure, and provide legal defense for both the DISTRICT and USER against any loss, claim, or damage arising from any injuries or occupational diseases occurring to any worker employed by, or any person retained by, USER in the course of carrying out the work or services contemplated in this Agreement. ■ Automobile Liability Insurance: USER shall procure such policy with coverage of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per accident. ■ The County of Los Angeles and Los Angeles County Flood Control District, its governing board, officers, agents, contractors, and employees shall be named as Additional Insureds on all policies of liability insurance. USER shall furnish to DISTRICT a Policy of Insurance evidencing USER's insurance coverage no later than (10) working days after execution of the Agreement, but before USER takes possession of the Premises. Upon renewal of said policy, USER shall furnish to DISTRICT a Certificate evidencing USER's continued insurance coverage as required herein. ■ The DISTRICT may accept, should USER elect to provide, a Certificate of Self -Insurance. The limits of such self-insurance coverage shall meet or exceed those stated herein. 6.3. USER and DISTRICT shall have no financial obligation to each other under this Use Agreement, except as herein expressly provided. 6.4. The parties expressly recognize and intend that in consideration of this Use Agreement, which is solely for USER's benefit that DISTRICT is not to incur any liability whatsoever for any injury, death, or property damage arising from any use of the PREMISES or the IMPROVEMENTS by persons who gain entry through openings or areas provided for USER's use. 6.5. DISTRICT, its Board, and any authorized officer, engineer, employee, or contractor, through its agents or representatives, shall have full right and authority to enter in and upon PREMISES at any and all reasonable times during the term of this Use Agreement, all without interference or hindrance by USER, its agents, officers, contractors, employees, or representatives for the purpose of inspecting the same and to serve or post any notice required or permitted by law for protection of any right or interest of DISTRICT. 6.6. Except as to fuels, lubricants, and products associated with motorized vehicles, equipment, gardening, or maintenance -related substances, or all 7 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, a body corporate and politic, by order of its Board of Supervisors, has caused this Use Agreement to be subscribed by the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the seal of the DISTRICT to be affixed hereto and attested by its executive Officer of the Board of Supervisors, and the USER has caused this Use Agreement to be executed by its duly authorized officer as of the date indicated below. USER: M Approved as to Form: uate DISTRICT: LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT a body corporate and politic 0 ATTEST: Sachi A. Hamai, Executive Officer of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles 0 Deputy APPROVED AS TO FORM: JOHN F. KRATTLI County Counsel M 9 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) On January 6, 1987, the Board of Supervisors for the County of Los Angeles and ex officio the governing body of all other special assessment and taxing districts, agencies, and authorities for which said Board so acts adopted a resolution pursuant to Section 25103 of the Government Code that authorized the use of facsimile signatures of the Chairman of the Board on all papers, documents, or instruments requiring the Chairman's signature. The undersigned hereby certifies that on this day of 20 , the facsimile signature of Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of the LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, was affixed hereto as the official execution of this document. The undersigned further certifies that on this date a copy of the document was delivered to the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of the LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT. In witness whereof, I have also hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year above written. (LACFCD-SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM JOHN F. KRATTLI. County Counsel By Deputy SACHI A. HAMAI, Executive Officer of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles 10 LA Deputy STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF On personally appeared ACKNOWLEDGMENT FORM ss. before me, Notary Public, (insert name of the officer) (insert name(s) and title(s)) who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature (Seal) 11 of the above, USER shall not cause or allow the presence, use, storage, or disposal of any hazardous substances on or about the PREMISES without the prior written consent of the DISTRICT, which consent shall not be unreasonably denied. In the event of spillage, leakage, or escape of any hazardous substance onto the PREMISES, USER shall immediately notify DISTRICT by calling (800) 675-4357. If the spillage, leakage, or escape was caused by USER, USER shall promptly remove any such substance from the PREMISES to the DISTRICT's satisfaction. In addition to removing any of USER's hazardous substances, USER shall be liable for and reimburse DISTRICT for any and all cost and expenses that DISTRICT may incur or suffer as a result thereof. Such responsibility shall include cost or expenses as DISTRICT may incur by reason of Federal, State, local, or other authoritative agency's laws and regulations. Notwithstanding the foregoing, USER shall have no responsibility regarding any spillage, leakage or escape associated with any of DISTRICT's tenants, licensees or easement holders. 6.7. Any notice to be given or document to be delivered by DISTRICT or USER to the other party may be delivered in person to either party or by private courier or may be deposited in the United States mail, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid and addressed to the party for whom intended as follows: To DISTRICT: Los Angeles County Flood Control District Attention SMP Division P.O. Box 1460 900 South Fremont Avenue, Alhambra, CA 91802-1460 tel.: (626) 458-7065 or (626) 458-7072; fax (626) 289-3618 for Emergencies, contact (626) 458 -HELP (4357) H H Addendum No. 1 Response to Comments Vesting_ Tentative Tract Map No. 72295 Willow Heights Final Environmental Impact report "Site D" Specific Plan SCH No. 2008021014 Lead Agency: City of Diamond Bar Community Development Department 21810 Copley Drive, Second Floor Diamond Bar, California 91765-4178 Applicant: Lennar Homes of California, Inc. 25 Enterprise, Suite 300 Aliso Viejo, California 92656 November 2013 Addendum No. 1 Response to Comments Vesting Tentative Map No. 72295 Willow Heights Final Environmental Impact Report "Site D" Specific Plan SCH No. 2008021014 Lead Agency: City of Diamond Bar Community Development Department 21810 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, California 91765-4178 Applicant: Lennar Homes of California, Inc. 25 Enterprise, Suite 300 Aliso Viejo, California 92656 Prepared by: Environmental Impact Sciences 26051 Via Concha Mission Viejo, California 92691-5416 November 2013 "Site D" Specific Plan City of Diamond Bar, California Table of Contents List of Sections Section Paqe 1.0 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................1 2.0 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD REGARDING CHANNEL MODIFICATIONS .....................2 2.1 Site D Specific Plan.............................................................................................2 2.2 Final Environmental Impact Report......................................................................2 2.3 Addendum...........................................................................................................5 3.0 LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS....................................8 4.0 AIR RIGHTS FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES.........................................................................9 5.0 UNDERGROUNDING OF PUBLIC FACILITIES..............................................................9 6.0 CEQA COMPLIANCE....................................................................................................10 List of Figures Figure ARTC-1 Conceptual Alternative Drainage Plan...........................................................................6 ARTC-2 Standard Design Plan for a Double Box Culvert............................................................7 List of Attachments Attachment A Flood Permit Application B County Permit Policies C County Guidelines for Overbuilding and Air Rights D Urban Freeway Cap Parks Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 November 2013 Addendum No. 1 — Response to Comments Page i "Site D" Specific Plan City of Diamond Bar, California 1.0 INTRODUCTION At its meeting on November 19, 2013, with regards to Agenda Item No. 7.1 (Resolution No. 2013- 34: Approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295, Associated Development Review and Tree Permit Applications, and Addendum #1 to the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Site D Specific Plan [Planning Case No. PL2013-229] to Authorize the Development of 182 Residential Units and a 2.5 Net -Acre Neighborhood Public Park at the Southeasterly Corner of Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard, Diamond Bar, CA 91765, et al.), the City of Diamond Bar (City or Lead Agency) City Council (Council) voted to continue the agenda item to December 3, 2013 in order to give City staff an opportunity to provide more information about the "feasibility" of covering that segment of the Brea Canyon Flood Control Channel (Channel) located within the "Site D" study area.' The project modification posited by the Council is addressed herein both in the context of "covering" (i.e., building a cover over or overbuild) and "undergrounding" (i.e., replacing the existing open channel with a subsurface conduit). If it should so elect, the Council possesses the discretionary authority to condition Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295 (VTT 72295) in the manner it deems appropriate. Here, the condition under consideration is the imposition of a project -specific obligation to cover the Channel or to replace the existing open culvert with an underground pipeline. From an entitlement perspective, the imposition of that condition on VTT 72295 (should it be so imposed) alters the proposed project in a physical way and, in so doing, potentially changes the project description and environmental analysis presented in the "Final Environmental Impact Report — `Site D' Specific Plan, SCH No. 2008021014" (FEIR)z and in the "Addendum No. 1 to the Final Environmental Impact Report — `Site D' Specific Plan, SCH No. 2008021014" (City of Diamond Bar, September 2013) (Addendum). This "Addendum — Response to Comments" (Addendum RTC) examines the environmental and other implications of that action and presents the Community Development Department's (Department) preliminary assessment whether that condition results in any significant impacts to the natural and human environment and can be accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable time period.3 In processing VTT 72295 and in its consideration of the subdivision of the "Site D" planning area, the City has elected to defer review of the final park plan until a later date. As illustrated in VTT 72295, two separate lots would be created which collectively comprise the entirety of the neighborhood park. The Channel bifurcates the proposed neighborhood park area, separating the 0.9 -acre "park" located to the west of and the 3.8 -acre "rain garden park/basin" located to the east of the Channel. As such, the Council retains the option to act on this item either as an integral part of VTT 72295 or, subject to the imposition of specified performance standards, to defer any action thereupon until the detailed park plan is brought back for the Council's consideration.4 1/ The project site is located in the Diamond Bar Creek watershed which constitutes a portion of the San Jose Creek subwatershed of the San Gabriel River watershed. 2/ The FEIR included, but was not limited to, the "Draft Environmental Impact Report —'Site D" Specific Plan, SCH No. 2008021014" (DEIR) and the "Response to Comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report —'Site D' Specific Plan, SCH No. 2008021014." 3/ As defined in the State CEQA Guidelines, "feasible" is defined to mean "capable of being accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable period of time, taking into account economic, environmental, legal, social, and technological factors" (14 CCR 15364). 4/ Section 15300 et seq. of the State CEQA Guidelines identifies certain "classes" of projects as being categorically exempt, acknowledging that those projects "do not have a significant effect on the environment and they are declared to be categorically exempt from the requirements for the preparation of environmental documents." Pursuant to Section 15302 therein, "Class 2 consists of replacement or reconstruction of existing structures and facilities Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 November 2013 Addendum No. 1 — Response to Comments Page 1 "Site D" Specific Plan City of Diamond Bar, California With regards to the Channel, based on the information presented in the Applicant's tentative subdivision map, assuming a 50 -foot width and a maximum length of 565 -foot length, the area now under consideration for possible coverage or undergrounding equates to about 0.65 acres (28,250 square feet). Alternatively, the DEIR assumed that the LACFCD's real property interests within the "Site D" planning area totaled about 0.75 acres. Although the actual County acreage and the area of possible Channel coverage may be less, the 0.75 -acre assumption is retained herein. In the event that the County's property were to be added to the area now identified by the Applicant as located within the boundaries of the current conceptual park plan, as potentially envisioned by the proposed condition, the park acreage within the "Site D" planning area might, therefore, increase by up to an additional 0.75 acres.5 Conversely, if the Applicant elects not to increase the size of the park beyond what is now proposed, a reduction in the size and reconfiguration of the two parcels comprising the park site would logically occur. 2.0 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD REGARDING CHANNEL MODIFICATIONS Both the "'Site D' Specific Plan" (SDSP) and the FEIR contain information relevant to the Channel's coverage or replacement with an underground pipeline. Information relevant to the proposed condition, as extracted from those two documents, is presented below. 2.1 Site D Specific Plan The SDSP contains a number of references to the possible coverage of the Channel. As indicated therein: (1) "The SDSP was originally envisioned to be a mixed use project, consisting of half of the site planned for a shopping center with frontages along Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard (and covering the channel), and the other half planned for up to 202 dwelling units" (p. 3); (2) "The Los Angeles County Flood Control District owns the channel separating the City and School District properties. The channel will most likely not be covered, but there may be an opportunity for it to be integrated into the trail system along Brea Canyon Road to the north and south, as well as connect to the walking trails within the project site" (p. 3); and (3) "The Brea Canyon Channel which runs through a small portion of the site may be covered as part of the development and will be available for parking and landscape uses only" (p. 26). The Channel's coverage was contemplated in the SDSP; however, the SDSP neither mandated the Channel's coverage nor precluded that action as a possible project component. 2.2 Final Environmental Impact Report The possible coverage of that portion of the Channel located within the "Site D" property, identified as Los Angeles County Private Drain No. 395 (PD 395), was examined in the FEIR, of which the where the new structure will be located on the same site as the structure replaced and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity as the structure replaced." Reference to the above cited statutory provision is not intended to indicate the City's ability to avail itself of that option but to indicate that the State Legislature has determined that certain "replacement and reconstruction" activities do not have the potential to produce significant environmental effects. 5/ Neither the FEIR nor the Addendum explicitly addressed the additional park acreage resulting from the coverage or undergrounding of the existing Channel. The FEIR did, however, assume the inclusion of and the modification of the Channel for the purpose of CEQA compliance. Absence specificity as to the precise nature of park improvements, from a broad environmental perspective, the expansion of park facilities would appear to have minimal environmental effects. When final park improvement plans are brought back for the Council's consideration, additional environmental review may be required in order to ensure that the nature of the proposed improvements and on-site amenities do not introduce new significant effects not previously considered by the Lead Agency. Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 November 2013 Addendum No. 1 — Response to Comments Page 2 "Site D" Specific Plan City of Diamond Bar, California "Draft Environmental Impact Report —'Site D' Specific Plan, SCH No. 2008021014" (DEIR) was a part. The following excerpts are extracted from the DEIR. As initially formulated, the "Site D" project was a mixed-use development involving both commercial and residential uses. Under the initial design concept, the Channel was to be covered and the area located there above used for parking and site access. As indicated and illustrated in the DEIR (p. 2-7; Figure 2-7, p. 2-16): As illustrated in Figure 2-7 ("Site D" Specific Plan - Conceptual Drainage Plan), the existing Brea Canyon Storm Drain Channel will be covered and become an underground drainage facility as it traverses the project site. To convey the 50 -year discharge, the proposed channel section will be 9 - feet wide by 8 -feet wide, double cell, reinforced concrete box (RCB) with an average cover of 20 feet. Fifty feet of transition box will be constructed from the proposed RCB section to the existing culvert section under Diamond Bar Boulevard. A transition structure downstream of the proposed RCB will be constructed to join the existing trapezoidal channel. That graphic is included as Figure ARTC-1 (Conceptual Alternative Drainage Plan) herein. With regards to discretionary permit, the DEIR (p. 2-22) stated that: [T]he project involves both the acceptance of the design and construction of the on-site storm drain system by the LACDPW [Los Angeles County Department of Public Works] and, through the conveyance of a leasehold interest, the LACDPW's authorization allowing the overbuilding (covering), air rights transference, and use of lands atop the Brea Canyon Storm Drain Channel for project -related purposes. With regards to conveyance of "air rights" above the Channel, the DEIR (p. ES -1) noted: The Brea Canyon Storm Drain Channel (Brea Canyon Channel), which runs generally parallel to Brea Canyon Road, separates the District Property from the City Property. The LACFCD's approximately 0.75 -acre facility (County Property) is presently an open box culvert. In accordance with the LACFCD's "Guidelines for Overbuilding and Air Rights," in combination with such other standards and procedures as may be established by the County, leasehold interests in the "air rights" above the channel could be conveyed to a non -County entity, thus allowing the channel to be covered and the lands situated above that facility used for other purposes. With regards to the LACDPW, the DEIR (p. 4.4-6) noted: The Brea Canyon Storm Drain Channel, which traverses the project site, is under the jurisdiction of the Los Angeles County Flood Control District (District), a division of the LACDPW. The County has developed "guidelines" for uses of the District's rights-of-way by other parties for "overbuilding open channels and covering storm drains to create surface Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 November 2013 Addendum No. 1 — Response to Comments Page 3 "Site D" Specific Plan City of Diamond Bar, California areas, to identify and resolve areas of incompatibility, and to provide the basic requirements for specific proposals that will maximize the long-range benefits to the public and the District."' As indicated therein, for operating rights-of-way, overbuilding will be allowed provided the District's needs for flood control and all existing foreign uses authorized by the District are protected or provided for. Proposed uses must accommodate recreational, utility, transportation, public housing, and open space requirements that are programmed for the channel in question.' County guidelines indicate that, in order to optimize safety and ensure the hydraulic and structural integrity of a particular flood control channel, the District and the ACOE [United States Army Corps of Engineers] have a number of operational requirements that must be met by every joint -use proposal. Those requirements include, but may not be limited to, the following: (1) Access into a covered channel is required every 500 feet; this access is usually of a pedestrian nature and could be in the form of manholes and ladders; (2) Adequate clearance inside the channel (a minimum height of channel wall) must be maintained throughout the channel for the transportation of heavy equipment used in channel repair, bridge, and bridge abutment repair; and (3) In the event the channel is covered, adequate ventilation must be provided to prevent the build-up of noxious or volatile fumes; a short reach of the channel shall remain uncovered, thereby aiding channel maintenance and repair.3 Footnotes (Note footnote numbering is altered herein from the original): 1. Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, Los Angeles County Flood Control District, Guidelines for Overbuilding and Air Rights, revised June 2004, p. 2. 2. The District is developing a Property Use Plan (PUP) for each major flood control channel to ensure that the channel rights-of-way are developed in a manner compatible with the adjoining properties and yield the maximum benefit to the local community. Proposals should be in conformance with the PUP; however, if a desired use is different, the project proponent will be required to submit a change (amendment) to the PUP for approval. An amendment may be acceptable, provided the change for a particular reach of channel is between successive streets and approved by the local planning agency. In addition, all environmental requirements need to be fulfilled to the satisfaction of the Lead Agency. 3. Ibid. [Op Cit.], pp. 6-7. If the Channel were to covered, the DER (p. 4.4-17) identified the following "condition of approval" (Condition of Approval 4-1, renumbered 4-2 in the FEIR) relating to that action: If the flood control channel right-of-way is to be utilized as part of the project's development plan, prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall obtain all requisite permits and approvals from the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works — Flood Control District allowing for the overbuilding of the Brea Canyon Storm Drain Channel and shall provide the City Engineer with documentation, acceptable to the City Engineer, demonstrating County approval and authorization, including a complete list of all permit requirements that may be associated therewith. Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 November 2013 Addendum No. 1 — Response to Comments Page 4 "Site D" Specific Plan City of Diamond Bar, California A project -specific hydrology study, examining coverage of the Channel, was included in Appendix E (Preliminary Hydrology and Water Quality Analysis') of the DER. As indicated, in part, therein: According to the record plans for Brea Canyon Channel (LACDPW private drain No. 395), 25 -year discharge of 2,285 cfs [cubic feet per second] is shown at downstream side of Diamond Bar Boulevard culvert. LACDPW has requested the improvements shall be designed to meet 50 -year storm runoff which is converted to 2,602 cfs. Again, for direct summation of two flows from the site and from the Channel, the 50 -year discharge is calculated as 2,777 cfs at this reach ... The proposed grading plan indicates that the existing Brea Canyon Channel at this reach will be replaced with reinforced concrete box (RCB) and the area created will be used for parking or landscaping. An existing tributary open channel east of project will be replaced with RCB as well for a proposed entrance to the site. To convey the 50 -year discharge, proposed channel section shall be double cells 9 feet wide by 8 feet high RCB with average 20 feet cover based on the proposed grading plan. 50 feet of transition box will be constructed from proposed RCB section to existing culvert section under Diamond Bar Boulevard. The County's "standard" design plan for a double reinforced concrete box (RCB) culvert was presented in the DER and is included herein as Figure ARTC-2 (Standard Design Plan for a Double Box Culvert). Other design options (e.g., circular pipe, pipe -arch, arch) and characteristics (e.g., flexible, semi -flexible, or rigid structures) may exist but were neither included nor discussed therein. Because the existing Channel's capacity is less than the existing 50 -year storm flow, even absent any increased flows associated with the proposed project, improvements to that segment of the Channel may be required (by others). As a result, the FEIR included the following mitigation measure (Mitigation Measure 4-1)': Prior to the issuance of grading permits, all drainage facilities and improvements shall be subject to final design and engineering review and approval by the City Engineer and, for those storm drain facilities under County jurisdiction, by the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW). 2.3 Addendum With the exception of the proposed pedestrian and service vehicle -only bridge constructed across the Channel and physically connecting the "park" and "rain garden/basin," the Addendum contains no additional information or analysis (beyond that presented in the FEIR) relating to the further coverage of the Channel and the environmental impacts resulting therefrom. 6/ PENCO Engineering, Inc., Preliminary Drainage Report for Site 'D' Improvements at Intersection of Diamond Bar Boulevard and Brea Canyon Road, Diamond Bar, California, February 7, 2008, revised April 6, 2009. '/ That mitigation measure is inclusive of the currently proposed bridge crossing the Channel and connecting the "park" and "rain garden/basin" and, if the project were to be modified to include the Channel's coverage, would include the Channel improvements identified herein. Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 November 2013 Addendum No. 1 — Response to Comments Page 5 "Site D" Specific Plan City of Diamond Bar, California PIPE CL PROP. Ur ROPE TO JOIN EX. P1Jy'UERf - \ PROP JOM EI TO %jjjjjj TC JOINIFYRANS OjSFRET UC� BAEq CANYpv AOgD, BHEA CANYON CHANNEL = \t EX. TRAPEZOIDAL �TRANSITION� i DOU91 CHANNEL FROM TRAPEZOID L �/� -��'` Al a' BOTTOM WIDTH TO DOBLE CELLS. 1.5:1 SIDE SLOPE BOB 8' HIGH ✓ \ FINISH€0 GRADE 'ROP. CONNECTION 14 - STORM DRAIN FROM J PROJECT (48' RCP) 413.27' ` CELLS 9'(W) BY $(H) RCB ACE COVER - 20 FEET a � o LGRAPHIC SCALE 50 D 50 ( IN FEET 1 inch 50 ft. � EX. DOUBLE CELL r7 8' BY 8' RCB = \ ---- --� 50' \ v� RANS171DN —RCB Figure ARTC-1 CONCEPTUAL ALTERNATIVE DRAINAGE PLAN Source: PENCO Engineering, Inc. Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 November 2013 Addendum No. 1 — Response to Comments Page 7 "Site D" Specific Plan City of Diamond Bar, California IT W a See Nate 5 spacl g SPan "g" bars S�� NumDar "f" Dor j ROOF SECTION SPANS 4'THRU 8' q INVERT SIMILAR / 1 :1� e" bars, sea Note $ See Nate 6� Alternative Const Jt� Canat Jt--, EXTERIOR WALL SECTION SPANS 4' THRU 8' "g" hers q 2" Cir TYP L+ (ap+iana"f"^ oars R4 T RCB �----�^M:: in fill®+ bar — 0.25 5 #44 "tl" 00 8 0.25x4- 5 #4 '16, For 'M4 1-- We Is, -C" w4 C m 10e le Max m 16 Ma et4 0 YPc. Al+erne+l 3see Confit Jt� Nat- 4 ontl 3 Invert Elev Sinn a. d9.1 ra'a—,bars T2 SPan, 5 TYPICAL SECTION SPANS 4' THRU S' r F-a— hateZ" CIr TYP "0" bora b" ba YS � �q" Min fillet a"bars C.25 5 14 "d" bars or 0.25 5 ��mm��m�mm���mm�sel��mm��mm�mml�ml�l��mm�m�mmml� a4 0 1e, far cover over 1D' -O" 114 0 18 Me. 9" bars See Nate 5 �f�i�ii➢®®®F�®®®®®i�Fi�li�m®1f9®�®�®I�®ice®mmmmmm®�®�®mmmfl� 18Maxc Const JT AlternativeConst L11-1 �mmmmmammmmm®®®[�[r�m��mor�mmam�l�mmm�m®gym®mm��» Cans,Jte, o" bars Slope 46:1 ®tiYBlY�m®f}�®�t�ei�R�mom m =10111M ts�mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmli�mmmm�mmmmmmmf�mmmmmmmmmmm ®E Immmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmlm mlmmm ��mmm0®©mml3imHimmaEYiRICi�mt3ill31m©®®mm®mmmmmm®mmm®m Om m ®�mmmmt�mmmm®IDm®mOF�immf�i�m�Q:lm�mmm0�mmm�lEli�E�m13�L3imm Imo®' SEE EM®' Im ���4YYf�®�®�����IYCI�®�®�®®®®r! �mm 3-00 wY/rslie'e[IY.�®�®IY'M�W[f®®WN®filtl __®mm�®®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmlE3l��Omm 1=1121 ®' �mm0®mm®m®m®�®�®®®mm0©®®m� MIZIMMIMMIZIMMMMMIM : • OmmmmmmmOmm EMClC������®fm�m®im������fm�mm a See Nate 5 spacl g SPan "g" bars S�� NumDar "f" Dor j ROOF SECTION SPANS 4'THRU 8' q INVERT SIMILAR / 1 :1� e" bars, sea Note $ See Nate 6� Alternative Const Jt� Canat Jt--, EXTERIOR WALL SECTION SPANS 4' THRU 8' "g" hers q 2" Cir TYP L+ (ap+iana"f"^ oars R4 T RCB �----�^M:: in fill®+ bar — 0.25 5 #44 "tl" 00 8 0.25x4- 5 #4 '16, For 'M4 1-- We Is, -C" w4 C m 10e le Max m 16 Ma et4 0 YPc. Al+erne+l 3see Confit Jt� Nat- 4 ontl 3 Invert Elev Sinn a. d9.1 ra'a—,bars T2 SPan, 5 TYPICAL SECTION SPANS 4' THRU S' r F-a— hateZ" CIr TYP "0" bora "g" bora f' bars TYPICAL SECTION SPANS 10'THRU 14' AC I T, NOTES: I royami Cdaavrmale.:a>¢mw/»,wmr®.:w 1. For boxes with span or height less thou alts ofthose slw.wn In Table, sae next greater ST. box concrete dim_fcna and reinforcement. Make neceesarY changes In bar Isagths and quantitle6. 2. Far bases with soon ar height or cover greeter +hon t— shown in tables, a special design is re¢11red. 3. 0—titles are alap—1 oto and far design purposes only. 4. It 15 permiaa ihle fa eliminate the 'so. -dad on every ether "e" bar. 5. " bars are 1 half µpacing. rov 6. Pide paving —ah oton hen too ie expo -ed ma when poveme.I is portland cement concrete, and adjust quantities. 7. Far design and details not shown, see Sicnaord Plan DB2. 6. This plan sheet may be MeW for mul+iple call cuirerts by mak ng necessary adjustments. Q RLO Invert Fl- FLAT INVERT ALTERNATIVE Spavin Spa in "b" bars i — "f" ar "e" bars _ INVERT SIMILAR 6" a" bars "P" bars Sea Note 6 Epac ROOF SECTION J 1.i m SPANS 1 0' THRU 14' "b" bora nF u a" cors m bars, See Note E 'e" } EXTERIOR WALL SECTION SPANS 10' THRU 14' STATE OF CALIFORNIA pEPARiMENT DF TRANEPORTATisN CAST -IN-PLACE REINFORCED CONCRETE DOUBLE BOX CULVERT NO SCALE Figure ARTC-2 STANDARD DESIGN PLAN FOR A DOUBLE BOX CULVER Source: Los Angeles County Department of Public Works Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 November 2013 Addendum No. 1 — Response to Comments Page 8 b" ba YS � �q" Min fillet a"bars C.25 5 14 "d" bars or 0.25 5 -�-� a4 0 1e, far cover over 1D' -O" 114 0 18 Me. 9" bars See Nate 5 18Maxc Const JT AlternativeConst L11-1 J Cans,Jte, o" bars Slope 46:1 "g" bora f' bars TYPICAL SECTION SPANS 10'THRU 14' AC I T, NOTES: I royami Cdaavrmale.:a>¢mw/»,wmr®.:w 1. For boxes with span or height less thou alts ofthose slw.wn In Table, sae next greater ST. box concrete dim_fcna and reinforcement. Make neceesarY changes In bar Isagths and quantitle6. 2. Far bases with soon ar height or cover greeter +hon t— shown in tables, a special design is re¢11red. 3. 0—titles are alap—1 oto and far design purposes only. 4. It 15 permiaa ihle fa eliminate the 'so. -dad on every ether "e" bar. 5. " bars are 1 half µpacing. rov 6. Pide paving —ah oton hen too ie expo -ed ma when poveme.I is portland cement concrete, and adjust quantities. 7. Far design and details not shown, see Sicnaord Plan DB2. 6. This plan sheet may be MeW for mul+iple call cuirerts by mak ng necessary adjustments. Q RLO Invert Fl- FLAT INVERT ALTERNATIVE Spavin Spa in "b" bars i — "f" ar "e" bars _ INVERT SIMILAR 6" a" bars "P" bars Sea Note 6 Epac ROOF SECTION J 1.i m SPANS 1 0' THRU 14' "b" bora nF u a" cors m bars, See Note E 'e" } EXTERIOR WALL SECTION SPANS 10' THRU 14' STATE OF CALIFORNIA pEPARiMENT DF TRANEPORTATisN CAST -IN-PLACE REINFORCED CONCRETE DOUBLE BOX CULVERT NO SCALE Figure ARTC-2 STANDARD DESIGN PLAN FOR A DOUBLE BOX CULVER Source: Los Angeles County Department of Public Works Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 November 2013 Addendum No. 1 — Response to Comments Page 8 "Site D" Specific Plan City of Diamond Bar, California The Applicant's current development plan does not assume the Channel's coverage. Some modification of that plan would, therefore, be required in order to implement that condition. Changes could include, but may not be limited to, revisions to: (1) the conceptual park plan; (2) the proposed grading plan; and (3) the proposed drainage improvement plans. Although it can reasonably be assumed that any resulting changes would be relatively minor, the City should await receipt of additional information from the Applicant prior to any determination concerning the nature of those changes and their potential environmental significance. 3.0 LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS A permit from the LACDPW is required in order to build over an existing storm drain or within a flood control easement. A permit application, including plans and structural calculations indicating that the proposed improvements would neither detrimentally affect the storm drain system nor its maintenance, must be submitted to the LACDPW's Construction Division — Permits and Subdivisions Section (900 South Fremont Avenue, 8th Floor, Alhambra, CA 91803-1331). The permit application package is included in Attachment A (Flood Permit Application). County permit policies regarding work within flood control facilities are presented in Attachment B (County Permit Policies). As specified therein, construction work affecting channel capacity is prohibited between October 15 and April 15. That prohibition, in combination with the additional time period required to obtain a County permit, could affect the Applicant's development schedule. The LACFCD has formulated "guidelines" for "overbuilding and air rights." The LACFCD's "Guidelines for Overbuilding and Air Rights" (Revised June 2004) are included as Attachment C (County Guidelines for Overbuilding and Air Rights) herein. In accordance therewith, the LACFCD will allow overbuilding and use of air rights by a long-term lease over fee -owned property. Lease documents shall contain requirements protecting the County's interests and include provisions for receipt of rental income. Proposed uses must accommodate recreational, utility, transportation, public housing, and open space requirements that may be programmed for the affected channel. As specified, in part, therein: To optimize safety and ensure the hydraulic and structural integrity of a particular flood control channel, the [Los Angeles County Flood Control] District and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers have a number of operational requirements that must be met by every joint use proposal. The following is a list of the major requirements. Please note that this list should not be considered complete or absolute. The requirements are: (1) Access into a covered channel is required every 500 feet. This access is usually of a pedestrian nature and could be in the form of manholes, ladders, etc. (2) Adequate clearances inside the channel (a minimum height of channel wall) must be maintained throughout the channel for the transportation of heavy equipment used in channel repair, bridge, and bridge abutment repair, etc. (3) In the event the channel is to be covered, adequate ventilation must be provided to prevent the build-up of noxious or volatile fumes. A short reach of the channel, 30 feet or so, to remain uncovered, thereby aiding channel maintenance and repair in that equipment and material could be lowered into or removed from the channel. Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 November 2013 Addendum No. 1 — Response to Comments Page 8 "Site D" Specific Plan City of Diamond Bar, California The City is unaware of the existence of any "Property Use Plan" (PUP) which may have been formulated by the LACFCD for either the entirety of the San Gabriel River or for that segment of Diamond Bar Creek in the vicinity of the Channel. If a PUP has been developed, that document may include provisions relating to authorized and prohibited land uses atop the Channel. 4.0 AIR RIGHTS FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES The rights to lands above and below the ground are separable from surface rights. As indicated in the Tax Code: "A change in ownership of real property occurs pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code section 60 upon the transfer of air rights located directly above the land surface which establishes their legal description. Air rights are considered real property by Property Tax Rule 124, which classifies them as land; a transfer of a present fee interest in air rights separate from the surface rights is legally possible since such rights are real property and part of land; and there should be a reappraisal of that portion of the land (air rights) that changes ownership." Although in a scale substantially larger than now under consideration by the City, as indicated in Attachment D (Urban Freeway Cap Parks), the County is currently considering a number of proposals to construct public parks (identified as cap parks, highway parks, and deck parks) above existing freeway rights-of-way. Nationally, examples are cited where such facilities have already been successfully developed. Similarly, throughout the County, there are many examples of public use of flood control facilities. As indicated in the "Los Angeles River Master Plan" (Los Angeles County, June 1996): "While the primary purpose of the Los Angeles River is to provide flood protection for existing and anticipated land uses in the Los Angeles Basin, decreasing open space resources has led to renewed interest by the Citizens of Los Angeles County in exploring opportunities for the Los Angeles River to support compatible and multiple uses" (Section VII, p. 2-1). As in the case of the Los Angeles River, based on the specific facility, adaptive public use many not necessitate coverage or undergrounding. That option (i.e., expanded public use without coverage or undergrounding) does not, however, appear available with regards to the Channel based on the physical constraints imposed by the site and other proximal land uses. The proposed project modification would necessitate three -party negotiations (Applicant, City, and County), including consideration of construction, maintenance, and other costs, tenure, fee payments, and, with regards to decking, obligations for the possible repair and removal. Although it would appear that a leasehold interest represents the appropriate legal instrument to establish a multiple use, a leasehold might include an expiration when the City could be mandated to vacate its interests and cease its use. Subject to the recommendations of the City Attorney, a public -use easement might allow for the creation of a long-term public use absent a definitive tenure. 5.0 UNDERGROUNDING OF PUBLIC FACILITIES Currently, the Channel is a trapezoidal concrete -lined open drainage facility. Under Diamond Bar Boulevard, a double 8 -foot by 8 -foot RCB serves as roadway culvert. In contrast, the proposed project modification assumes a double 9 -feet by 8 -feet RCB. The FEIR notes that "50 feet of transition box will be constructed from [the] proposed RCB section to [the] existing culvert section under Diamond Bar Boulevard." No off-site improvements to the existing Channel were identified in the FEIR. Construction activities associated with Channel modifications in proximity to Diamond Bar Boulevard might, however, necessitate temporary lane closures. Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 November 2013 Addendum No. 1 — Response to Comments Page 9 "Site D" Specific Plan City of Diamond Bar, California In addition to new County permit requirements, because the proposed modification will directly impact Diamond Bar Creek, new or altered permit obligations which are not presently a part of the proposed project would be created with the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region (LARWQCB) (Section 401 water quality certification), California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) (Section 1602 streambed alteration agreement), and United States Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) (Section 404 permit). Any permit activities that may already be underway with those agencies would likely need to be modified based on the additional impacts resulting from the proposed storm drain improvements. Any new or altered permit requirements could result in a delay in project commencement. 6.0 CEQA COMPLIANCE As now proposed, the Applicant seeks to retain the open Channel; therefore, modifications to the Channel associated with VTT 72295 would be minimal (e.g., an existing tributary open channel located within the "Site D" planning area and to the east of Channel will be replaced with a RCB). Conversely, if covered, the existing open Channel would need to be removed, concrete and other materials removed from the site, grading in the vicinity of the channel would increase, a double RCB culvert (or alternative design) would need to be installed, and sufficient ground cover laid atop the subsurface facility. In order to provide adequate depth of soil atop the channel for landscaping, the Applicant's grading plans in the vicinity of the Channel and the proposed neighborhood park would likely need to be altered from the plans now before the Council. If retained as an open Channel, only minimal modifications to that facility would be required; however, if that facility were to be covered or replaced with an underground culvert (either by the Applicant or by others), additional engineering analysis would be required by the LACDPW. Because placing a deck above or placing a lid on the existing Channel could become flow constraining and could adversely affect upstream conditions, the County would likely impose additional design requirements relative to the nature of any associated on-site improvements. In addition, recognizing that storm drain systems constitute an interrelated network, requirements for additional off-site improvements (which are now not a part of the proposed project) could be imposed by the County for adjoining segments. Under both coverage options, the project's infrastructure improvement costs would increase and the project's effectuation could be delayed while detailed hydrology studies and engineering drawings are under review by the LACDPW and as a result of further permit review by the LARWQCB, CDFG and ACOE. To the extent that the information produced by those studies, infrastructure improvements, and permit obligations were to introduce significant new information, additional CEQA review would likely be required. With regards to the proposed condition, insufficient information is presently available to conduct an environmental assessment of the potential impacts associated with the coverage of the Channel. Similarly, because the inclusion of that condition has the potential to alter the design and development of VTT 72295 (e.g., revisions to the conceptual park, proposed grading, and proposed drainage improvement plans), it is not known to what extent the Addendum would need to be altered and/or whether the Addendum would continue to suffice as the appropriate manner of CEQA compliance. Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 November 2013 Addendum No. 1 — Response to Comments Page 10 Attachment A Flood Permit Application �y1�GEi�S 01 u� .o PUBLIC WUf KU G6r`s�hlce jp'��o LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 900 S. FREMONT AVE. ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91803-1331 TRACKING NO. FLOOD PERMIT APPLICATION DATERECEIVED: OWNER/ APPLICANT: TELEPHONE: ADDRESS: Street AGENT/ CONTACT: ADDRESS: E-MAIL City TELEPHONE: Zip Code Street City Zip Code SITE ADDRESS: Street City Zip Code NEAREST INTERSECTION: THOMAS GUIDE: SCOPE OF WORK: PERSON/AGENCY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE PROPOSED FACILITY: PHONE: ( ) The undersigned certifies that the applicant for this permit is familiar with the requirements of the County Lobbyist Ordinance (Los Angeles County Code Chapter 2.160), and that all persons acting on behalf of the applicant have complied with and will continue to comply with this ordinance throughout the application process. It is further agreed that the Owner/Applicant is the financially responsible party for all fees, deposits, charges, collections and refunds, regardless if payment is made by others Print Name of Owner/Applicant Signature of Owner/Applicant Date Submittal Requirements: 1. Four sets of final construction plans (seven if the Corps is involved) with structural details and profiles of the existing and proposed facilities. 2. Two sets of letter size structural and/or hydraulic and hydrology calculations. The plans and calculations must be stamped and signed by a registered civil/structural engineer licensed to practice in the State of California. 3. Four copies of the As -Built drawings of the District's facility impacted by the proposed work and two of the right-of-way map. 4. Letter from Owner/Applicant authorizing Agent/Contact to request a permit on their behalf. 5. For storm drain connections, complete EXHIBIT "A" when applicable, and submit SUSMP. 6. Fees will be charged according to the current ordinance established by the Board of Supervisors 7. Certificate of Liability Insurance ($1 Million minimum coverage) and additional insured endorsement naming the County of Los Angeles, the Los Angeles County Flood Control District, and, when applicable, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as co-insured. 8. Complete and sign acknowledgement that Applicant has read, understands, and agrees to fully comply with the Best Management Practices (BMP) Attachment to this permit per Los Angeles County Code Chapter 12.80 Stormwater and Runoff Pollution Control. The applicant must show that the proposed work will not adversely affect the District's interests; i.e., (1) Hydraulic and Hydrologic Design; (2) Structural integrity; (3) Maintenance standards; (4) District's property rights, etc. PAYMENT Issuance Fee: $ Plan Check: $ Inspection: $ Other: $ Total: $ TYPE torm rain onnectior atch asin Relocation u Lbatch asin Modification INFO Stream/Project FOR DISTRICT USE ONLY RECEIVED BY: ASSIGNED TO: Project No. (Fee or AC) Project No. (Fee or AC) Project No. (Fee or AC) Project No. and apin 1 u ajor odifications inor odificationsu File Code Suc inerued RU tin MDLtw ES-M;.ES M[ CE,11111 RD�u PM DD QED uW L6�MER� MD KOad nit UOtheru Uoverbtddu triilidtgy�rossingu PD/MTD (To be Transferred) Tract/P.M. No. P:\Idpub\Permits\Flood Unit\Flood Permit Application APPROVED BY MA 11-2011 NO -u P.O. # 1 OF 2 FOR DISTRICT USE ONLY (Preliminary Check) General ❑ Incomplete packages are NOT accepted ❑ Plan Check and Inspection fees included ❑ Vicinity Map ❑ Affected facility (i.e. MTD, RDD, & etc.) has been transferred to the District for maintenance General Engineering Requirements ❑ Two sets of calculations and/or reports stamped and signed by a Civil/Structural/Geotechnical Engineer ❑ Four sets of plans (seven for Army Corp facilities) signed and stamped by a Civil/Structural/Geotechnical Engineer ❑ Four copies of District's facility "As -Built" drawings that are affected by the proposed work ❑ Name of affected District facility shown on the plans for the proposed work ❑ Plan, Profiles, Elevations, Sections, and Details for the proposed work Storm Drain Connections ❑ Existing hydraulic and hydrology data of the District's facility impacted by the proposed connection ❑ Obtain the "Allowable Q" from Design Division ❑ Revised Hydraulic calculations taking into account the proposed connection ❑ Water quality agreement signed and notarized (Not always required) ❑ Stationing along LACFCD's storm drain centerline where the proposed connection is located ❑ SUSMP Catch basin relocation ❑ Existing catch basin hydrology and design data included. ❑ Revised catch basin hydrology and design data included. ❑ Connector pipe hydraulics. ❑ Street capacity calculations Crossings over channels ❑ Water surface and pier loss calculations ❑ Structural calculations for the bridge/ utility crossing including surcharges on the District facility ❑ Plan and profile plans Overbuilds ❑ Right-of-way letter of approval from the underlying fee owner ❑ Two copies of the structural calculations for added surcharges on the District facility ❑ Two copies of the right-of-way map ❑ Two copies of the easement documents (if LACFCD is not the underlying fee owner) Utility Crossings Under -crossing ❑ Plan and profile of proposed utility showing the District storm drain ❑ Method of support and structural calculations ❑ Two copies of right-of-way map and four copies of the "as built" Over -crossing ❑ Plan and profile of proposed utility showing the District storm drain ❑ Two copies of right-of-way map and four copies of the "as built" ❑ Structural calculations for added surcharges on the District facility Temporary Use Short Term Use (less than a year) ❑ Liability Insurance ($1,000,000 minimum coverage) including LACFCD/LACDPW as additionally insured ❑ Plot plan with north arrow and limits of affected areas Long Term Use (more than a year) ❑ Copy of Use Agreement, Recreation Agreement ❑ SDF Plot plan with north arrow and limits of affected areas P:\Idpub\Permits\Flood Unit\Flood Permit Application APPROVED BY MA 11-2011 2 OF 2 SAMPLE AUTHORIZATION LETTER (Authorizing Company/Party Letterhead) Date: Los Angeles County DPW Land Development Division 900 South Fremont Ave, 8th FL Alhambra, CA 91803 LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION Please be advised that (Owner/Applicant name or company name) authorizes (Individual name of/or company name) to act as an agent on my (our) behalf in all matters related to obtaining a(n) (permit type) permit. Our Agent is designated and responsible for the following: ❑ Deliver our payment for fees and deposits ONLY. ❑ Provide payment of fees and deposits ONLY. ❑ Other: I(we) further understand and agree that I(we) shall remain responsible for all permit conditions, permit provisions, fees, deposits, refunds, additional charges and collections resulting from permit application processing, permit issuance and inspection of work. (Signature) (Print) Customer Name: Full Company Address: Email Address: Phone Number: Fax Number: P:\Idpub\Pernuts\Forms\Authorization\third-party-auth-form sample -approved by MA 11-14-201 Ldoc LIABILITY INSURANCE: The Permittee shall furnish the Agency a certificate of liability insurance with the Agency named as certificate holder and a copy of the Additional Insured Endorsement to the general liability insurance of the permittee's contractor. Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy or any subsequent endorsement attached thereto, the Agency shall be named as an additional insured covering the work, whether liability is attributable to the Permittee or the Agency. 1. The Permittee may file insurance acceptable to the Agency covering more than one permit. The coverage shall provide the following minimum limits: Bodily Injury ........... $ 250,000 each person $ 500,000 each occurrence $ 500,000 aggregate products and completed operations Property Damage ....... $ 100,000 each occurrence $ 250,000 aggregate 2. A combined single limit policy with aggregate limits in the amount of $ 1,000,000 will be considered equivalent to the required minimum limits. All liability insurance policies shall bear an endorsement or shall have attached rider whereby it is provided that, in the event of expiration or proposed cancellation of such policies for any reason whatsoever, the Agency shall be notified by mail, giving a sufficient time before the date thereof to comply with any applicable law or statute, but in no event less that 30 days before expiration or cancellation is effective. The Additional Insured Endorsement to the general liability insurance must contain the following language: "The County of Los Angeles and public entity or Special District for which the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors is the Governing Body, and theirAgents, Officers and Employees, shall be Additional insured(s) while acting within the scope of their duties against all claims arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed." P:\Idpub\Permits\Insurance\Insurance - Revised 10-NOV-2011.doc ACORD,. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE (MM/DD/YYYY) PRODUCER INSURANCE BROKER OR COMPANY NAME AND CONTACT INFORMATION, INCLUDING EMAIL ADDRESS THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC # INSURED COMPANY NAME AND CONTACT INFORMATION, INCLUDING A VALID EMAIL ADDRESS INSURERA: POLICY NUMBER INSURERB: POLICY EXPIRATION INSURERC: ATTENTION: INSURER D: GENERAL LIABILITY INSURER E: COVERAGES THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSRDD' LTRINSR ISSUING INSURER SHALL MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO P. O. BOX 1460 POLICY NUMBER POLICYEFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION LIMITS ATTENTION: GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ DAMAGE TO RENTED COMMERCIALGENERAL LIABILITY PREMISES Ea occur.... $ CLAIMS MADE � OCCUR MED EXP (Any one person) $ Sarn SONAL&ADVINJURY $ ERALAGGREGATE $ )I GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: ODUCTS -COMP/OPAGG $ POLICY PRO LOC AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT (Ea accident) $ BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ ALL OWNEDAUTOS SCHEDULEDAUTOS BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ HIRED AUTOS NON -OWNED AUTOS PROPERTYDAMAGE (Per accident) $ GARAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT $ OTHER THAN EA ACC $ ANY AUTO $ AUTOONLY: AGG EXCESS/UMBRELLA LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ OCCUR F—I CLAIMS MADE AGGREGATE $ $ DEDUCTIBLE $ RETENTION $ WORKERS COMPENSATION AND WC STATU- OTH- TORY LIMITS ER. EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? If yes, describe under SPECIAL PROVISIONS below . DISEASE- POLICY LIMIT $ OTHER C1 I DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/EXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT/ SPECIAL PVISIONS Please provide specific details such as project location, type of work, application tracking number, permit number, etc... CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE LAND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION ISSUING INSURER SHALL MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO P. O. BOX 1460 THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. ALHAMBRA, CA 91802-1460 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ATTENTION: ACORD 25 (2001/08) ©ACORD CORPORATION 1988 POLICY NUMBER: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CG 20 12 05 09 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. ADDITIONAL INSURED - STATE OR GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY OR SUBDIVISION OR POLITICAL SUBDIVISION - PERMITS OR AUTHORIZATIONS This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the follov ring: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART SCHEDULE State Or Governmental Agency Or Subdivision Or Politica Subdivision: The County of Los Angeles and public entity or Special District for which the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors is the Governing Body, and their Agents, Officers and Employees, shall be Additional insured(s) while acting within the scope of their duties against all claims arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed. Information required to complete this Schedule, if not shown P iove, will be shown in the Declarations. Section II — Who Is An Insured is amended to in- clude as an insured any state or governmental agency or subdivision or political subdivision shown in the Schedule, subject to the following provisions: 1. This insurance applies only with respect to opera- tions performed by you or on your behalf for which the state or governmental agency or subdivision or political subdivision has issued a permit or au- thorization. .. 2. This insurance does not apply to: a. "Bodily injury", "property damage" or "personal and advertising injury" arising out of operations performed for the federal government, state or municipality; or b. "Bodily injury" or "property damage" included within the "products -completed operations hazard". 0 CG 2012 05 09 © Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2008 Page 1 of 1 13 e�e$ c G 0 z b PUBLIC WORKS Po LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS G yr t f�cservtce Tra�a Acknowledgement Best Management Practices (BMP) Attachment DATE: PERMIT NO. OWNER/APPLICANT: ADDRESS: STREET FAX: ( ) CELL: ( ) PRINT NAME WET SIGNATURE (REQUIRED) CITY EMAIL ADDRESS: PHONE: ( 1 AGENT/CONTACT: PHONE: PRINT NAME WET SIGNATURE (REQUIRED) ADDRESS: ZIP CODE STREET CITY ZIP CODE FAX: ( ) CELL: ( ) EMAIL ADDRESS: hereby acknowledges reading, understanding, and agreeing to comply with the Best Management Practices (BMP) Attachment in accordance with Los Angeles County Code Chapter 12.80 Stormwater and Runoff Pollution Control. SITE ADDRESS: Street City Zip Code NEAREST INTERSECTION: THOMAS GUIDE: PLEASE SUBMIT THIS DOCUMENT WITH THE APPLICATION UPDATED 10-2009 POSTED 11/02/2009 Best Management Practices (BMPs) Attachment The Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW) requires Permittees and their contractors to implement a program to effectively control water pollution during all Permit construction projects. This project shall conform with the requirements of the following County Code and Permits: • Los Angeles, California County Code Chapter 12.80 Stormwater and Runoff Pollution Control • Waste Discharge Requirements for Municipal Storm Water and Urban Runoff Discharges within the County of Los Angeles, and the Incorporated Cities Therein, Except the City of Long Beach (Order No. 01-182, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System [NPDES] No. CAS004001), • NPDES General Permit No. CAS000002, Order No. 99-08-DWQ, Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges of Storm Water Runoff Associated with Construction Activities. The Permittee or Authorized Representative and their contractors shall know and fully comply with the applicable provisions of these permits and Federal, State and local regulations that govern the Permittee or Authorized Representative's operations and the storm water discharges from the project site. In order to ensure a minimum level of water quality control, the Permittee or Authorized Representative and their contractors shall effectively implement and maintain appropriate Best Management Practices (BMPs) shown in Table 1. In addition, the Permittee or Authorized Representative and their contractors shall comply with the following requirements: • Sediments shall not be discharged to the storm drain system or receiving waters. Sediments generated on the construction site shall be retained. • No construction -related materials: waste, spills, or residue shall be discharged from the project site to streets, drainage facilities, receiving waters, or adjacent property by wind or runoff. • Non -storm water runoff from equipment, vehicle washing, or any other activity shall be contained within the project site using appropriate BMPs. • Erosion from slopes and channels shall be prevented. • Minimize grading during the wet season (October 15 through April 15). All erosion susceptible slopes shall be covered, planted, or protected in any way that prevents sediment discharge from the project site. BMPs shall conform to the requirements in the LACDPW Construction Division's "Construction Site Best Management Practices (BMPs) Manual," and addenda thereto issued up to and including, the date of issuance of the Permit for the project. Copies of the Manual are available for purchase from: Los Angeles County Department of Public Works Cashier's Office 900 South Fremont Avenue Alhambra, CA 91803 Telephone (626) 458-6959 Year -Round Implementation Requirements The Permittee or Authorized Representative and their contractors shall have an effective program for implementing, inspecting, and maintaining water pollution control practices for wind erosion control, tracking control, non -storm water control, and waste management and materials pollution control. Soil stabilization and sediment control practices shall be provided throughout the rainy season, defined as between October 15 and April 15, and whenever the National Weather Service predicts rain within 24 hours. The National Weather Service weather forecast shall be monitored and used by the Permittee on a daily basis. The non -rainy season shall be defined as all days outside the defined rainy season. Disturbed soil areas within the project shall be protected in conformance with the requirements in the Construction Site BMP Manual with sediment controls implemented prior to a predicted rain event. Maintenance and Inspection The Permittee or Authorized Representative and their contractors shall be responsible throughout the duration of the project for installing, constructing, inspecting, maintaining, removing and disposing of the BMPs. Unless otherwise directed by LACDPW, the Permittee or Authorized Representative and their contractors are responsible for BMP implementation and maintenance throughout any temporary suspension of work. The Permittee or Authorized Representative shall reimburse LACDPW for the full costs of cleaning or repairing of storm drain, water course, or channel which may be necessary due to ineffective implementation of BMPs. The project site shall be inspected by the Permittee or Authorized Representative or their contractors a minimum of once every week or at least once for projects that last only one week or less. Report of Non -Permitted Discharge and Enforcement If the Permittee or Authorized Representative or their contractors identify any non -permitted discharge into the storm drain system or receiving waters in a manner causing, or potentially causing, a condition of pollution, or if the project receives a written notice or order from any regulatory agency, the Permittee or Authorized Representative or their contractors shall immediately inform LACDPW Construction Division Permits Section by calling the assigned Field Office. The Permittee or Authorized Representative or their contractors shall submit a written report (see attached Notice of Non -Permitted Discharge) to the LACDPW within 5 days of the discharge event, notice or order. The Permittee or Authorized Representative and their contractors are subject to enforcement action by Chapter 12.80 of the Los Angeles County Code that states, "Any person, firm, corporation, municipality or district or any officer or agent of any firm, corporation, municipality or district violating any provision of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. Such violation shall be punishable by a fine of not more than $1,000 or by imprisonment in the county jail for a period not to exceed six months, or by both fine and imprisonment. Each day during any portion of which such violation is committed, continued or permitted shall constitute a separate offense and shall be punishable as such (Ord. 98-0021§1 (part), 1998). " In addition, the Permittee or Authorized Representative and their contractors are subject to enforcement action by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), Environmental Protection Agency, private citizens and citizen groups. The Permittee or Authorized Representative and their contractors shall be responsible for the costs and for liabilities imposed by law as a result of the Permittee or Authorized Representative or their contractor's failure to comply. Costs and liabilities include, but are not limited to, fines, penalties and damages whether assessed against LACDPW or the Permittee or Authorized Representative or their contractors, including those levied under the Federal Clean Water Act and the State Porter Cologne Water Quality Act. Table 1 Construction Site BMPs ID BMP Name Minimum Requirement(') Tem or ry Soil Stabilization SS -1 Scheduling Preservation of Existing Vegetation SS -3 Hydraulic Mulch PX(2)SS-2 SS -4 Hydroseeding SS -5 Soil Binders SS -6 Straw Mulch SS -7 Geotextiles, Plastic Covers, & Erosion Control Blankets/Mats(3) SS -8 Wood Mulching SS -9 Earth Dikes/Drainage Swales & Ditches SS -10 Outlet Protection/Velocity Dissipation Devices SS -11 Slope Drains SS -12 Streambank Stabilization Tem or ry Sediment Control SC -1 Silt Fence (4) SC -2 Desilting Basin SC -3 Sediment Trap SC -4 Check Dam SC -5 Fiber Rolls SC -6 Gravel Bag Berm SC -7 Street Sweeping and Vacuuming X SC -8 Sandbag Barrier SC -9 Straw Bale Barrier SC -10 Storm Drain Protection X(2) Wind Erosion Control WE -1 I Wind Erosion Control X(2) Tracking Control TC -1 Stabilized Construction Entrance/Exit TC -2 Stabilized Construction Roadway TC -3 Entrance/Outlet Tire Wash Additional BMPs may be required based on actual field condition, Contractor operations, or construction operations. (Z) Not all minimum requirements may be applicable to every project. Applicability to a specific project shall be verified by the Permittee or Authorized Representative and their Contractor. (3) The Permittee or Authorized Representative and their Contractors shall select one of the identified soil stabilization BMPs or a combination thereof. (4) The Permittee or Authorized Representative and their Contractors shall select one of the identified sediment control barrier BMPs or a combination thereof. (5) Dewatering BMPs are required for discharging accumulated precipitation (rain and snow melt) and for potential contact with groundwater during excavation. Separate permit requirements are applicable for construction dewatering of groundwater. Table 1 (continued) Construction Site BMPs ID BMP Name Minimum Requirement(') Non -Storm Water Management NS -1 Water Conservation Practices NS -2 Dewatering Operations (5) NS -3 Paving and Grinding Operations NS -4 Temporary Stream Crossing NS -5 Clear Water Diversion NS -6 Illicit Connection/Illegal Discharge Detection and Reporting X NS -7 Potable Water/Irrigation NS -8 Vehicle Equipment Cleaning X NS -9 Vehicle Equipment Fueling X NS -10 Vehicle Equipment Maintenance X NS -11 Pile Driving Operations NS -12 Concrete Curing NS -13 Material and Equipment Use Over Water NS -14 Concrete Finishing NS -15 Structure Demolition/Removal Over or Adjacent to Waters NS -16 I Temporary Batch Plant Waste Management and Material Pollution Control WM-1 Material Delivery X WM-2 Material Use X WM-3 Stockpile Management WM-4 Spill Prevention and Control X WM-5 Solid Waste Management X(2) WM-6 Hazardous Waste Management WM-7 Contaminated Soil Management WM-8 Concrete Waste Management WM-9 Sanitary/Septic Waste Management X WM-10 Liquid Waste Management Additional BMPs may be required based on actual field condition, Contractor operations, or construction operations. (Z) Not all minimum requirements may be applicable to every project. Applicability to a specific project shall be verified by the Permittee or Authorized Representative and their Contractor. (3) The Permittee or Authorized Representative and their Contractors shall select one of the identified soil stabilization BMPs or a combination thereof. (4) The Permittee or Authorized Representative and their Contractors shall select one of the identified sediment control barrier BMPs or a combination thereof. (5) Dewatering BMPs are required for discharging accumulated precipitation (rain and snow melt) and for potential contact with groundwater during excavation. Separate permit requirements are applicable for construction dewatering of groundwater. Notice of Non -Permitted Discharge To: Date: Subject: Notice of Discharge Project Name: Permit Number: Date, time, and location of discharge: Type of operation that resulted in the discharge: Describe any adverse impacts resulting from the discharge: Describe existing BMP(s) in place prior to the discharge event: Date and type of corrective action or BMPs deployed after the discharge: Proposed corrective actions to be taken to reduce, eliminate, andlor prevent recurrence of the discharge: Name of Contact Person Company Signature Title Telephone Number Date Attachment B County Permit Policies PERMIT POLICY DURING THE STORM SEASON While it is the Department's Standard policy to not allow permitted work within a flood control facility during the specified storm season, we recognize the necessity of sometimes working within channels during the storm season. Although each case must be evaluated separately, the following guidelines are intended to serve as consistent instruction for reviewing such cases. CHANNELS Armorps Constructed Channels- No construction work whatsoever affecting the channel structure or carrying capacity during the period of October 15 to April 15. Access with mobile equipment, to be removed at the end of each workday, is allowed with a 5 -day clear weather forecast. No storage of equipment and materials is allowed within the channel/storm drain. Storm drain connection work is allowed if - 1. i1. Connecting pipe size is 24 -in. or less in diameter 2. Five-day clear weather forecast 3. Seal the opening on the channel with a 1/2 -inch steel plate extending 6 -inches beyond the opening in all directions at the end of each day. 4. Plate edges must be impermeable and secured with 1/2- inch diameter bolts spaced at 12 -inches. 5. Channel is rectangular (No connections to trapezoidal channels are allowed) L.A. County Flood Control District Channels- Limited work is allowed within the channels as long as full capacity can be maintained or restored within 5 -days of predicted rain. Access with mobile equipment, to be removed at the end of each workday, is allowed with a 5 -day clear weather forecast. No storage of equipment and materials is allowed within the channel/storm drain. Storm drain connection work is allowed if: 1. Connecting pipe size is 24 -in. or less in diameter 2. Five-day clear weather forecast 3. Seal the opening on the channel with a 1/2 -inch steel plate extending 6 -inches beyond the opening in all directions at the end of each day. 4. Plate edges must be impermeable and secured with 1/2- inch diameter bolts spaced at 12 -inches. 5. Channel is rectangular (No connections to trapezoidal channels are allowed) UNDERGROUND STORM DRAINS Limited work is allowed within the underground storm drains as long as full capacity can be maintained or restored within 5 -days of predicted rain. Storm drain connection work is allowed i£ 1. Connecting pipe size is 24 -in. or less in diameter 2. Five-day clear weather forecast 3. For concrete box mainlines seal the opening of the breakout limits with a %-inch steel plate extending 6 -inches beyond the opening in all directions at the end of each day. 4. Plate edges must be impermeable and secured with %2- inch diameter bolts spaced at 12 -inches. 5. For pipe to pipe connections the work must be started and completed prior to any forecasted rain. During the period from April 15 to October 15, falsework and cofferdams may be placed and excavations made in the channel. However, capacity to convey flows around any obstructions or openings in the channel lining shall be provided as follows: April 16 to May 31: 33% of design capacity. June 1 to August 31: 5% of design capacity. September 1 to October 14: 33% of design capacity. Hydraulic calculations substantiating capacity must be reviewed and approved prior to start of construction. I:\Section\Permits\Flood\Master\STORMPOLICY.wpd Attachment C County Guidelines for Overbuilding and Air Rights LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT GUIDELINES FOR OVERBUILDING AND AIR RIGHTS CONSTRUCTION DIVISION - PERMITS AND SUBDIVISIONS SECTION REVISED JUNE 2004 CONTENTS I. EXAMPLES OF OVERBUILDING 11 -1- TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 A. INTRODUCTION 2 B. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 2 1. Joint Use Right of Way 2 2. Master Planning 2 3. Compatibility 3 4. Indemnification and Insurance 3 C. CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS 3 1. Types of Overbuilding 3 2. Criteria for Design and Analysis for Overbuilding 4 3. Aesthetic Requirements 6 D. OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS 6 E. RIGHT OF WAY AVAILABILITY 7 1. Operating Right of Way 7 2. Excess Right of Way 7 F. OTHER REQUIREMENTS 7 G. DOCUMENTS 8 H. PROCEDURE TO BE FOLLOWED FOR USE OF DISTRICT'S FACILITIES 8 I. EXAMPLES OF OVERBUILDING 11 -1- GUIDELINES FOR OVERBUILDING AND AIR RIGHTS A. INTRODUCTION The purpose of these guidelines is to provide information relative to the various possible uses by other parties of the District's rights of way for overbuilding open channels and covered storm drains to create surface areas, to identify and resolve areas of incompatibility, and to provide the basic requirements for specific proposals that will maximize the long-range benefits to the public and the District. The guidelines recognize that channels and their rights of way, in addition to providing flood protection, have the potential as transportation, utility, and recreational corridors, for overbuilding for public housing development, and are also desired by some communities as open space areas. Requirements are included to protect the District's interest to ensure that proper operation and maintenance of the channels and other uses can be accomplished. Private parties are encouraged to use District's rights whenever a proposal is found to be compatible with District's needs and authorized or planned uses by others. To this end, the District's goal is to allow utilization of its rights of way to the most efficient degree possible. B. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Joint Use Right of Way Interested public agencies and developers should consult the District at an early stage regarding joint use, the extent of the rights held by the District, and the areas that may be reserved for other public uses. In some instances, competitive bidding for use of the right of way and air rights may be required. In those instances where District's holding is not of sufficient size to be useful in itself and a proposal is received to utilize District's open channel in conjunction with adjoining ownership, a bidding proposal will not be undertaken. For operating right of way, overbuilding by others will be allowed provided District needs for flood control and all existing foreign uses authorized by the District are protected or provided for as further described in Item 3 below. Proposed uses must accommodate recreational, utility, transportation, public housing, and open space requirements that are programmed for the channel in question. Master Planning District is developing a Property Use Plan (PUP) for each major flood control channel to ensure that the channel rights of way are developed in a manner compatible with the adjoining properties and yield the maximum benefit to the local community. Proposals should be in conformance with the plan; however, if a desired use is different, the applicant will be required to submit a change (amendment) to the plan for approval. An amendment may be acceptable, provided the change for a particular reach of channel is between successive streets and approved by the local planning agency. Also, all environmental requirements will have to be fulfilled to the satisfaction of the lead agency. -2- Compatibility a. Joint use will have to provide for District's paramount right to use its right of way for flood control purposes and shall not adversely affect design, construction, operation, maintenance, or integrity of District's existing or proposed facilities. b. A facility that may affect any non -District installations shall be designed, constructed, operated, and maintained to be compatible with them. All approvals required of other agencies and parties shall be the responsibility of the applicant. District will make its records available regarding other permittees and users of its right of way. C. Public agencies needs, including, but not limited to, recreation, transportation, overbuilding for public housing, and open space, either authorized or proposed, will have to be accounted for by joint use. Recreation and transportation standards will be provided by the District for each proposal. d. Joint uses will have to comply with all State, County, and local zoning and building regulations. The District wishes to remain a "good neighbor" to the surrounding area and will not allow a use that it or the local community would find objectionable. Therefore, proposals should be aesthetically pleasing, compatible with surrounding areas, conducive to long-term use, and reflect good planning. 4. Indemnifications and Insurance Unless otherwise waived by the District, upon a showing of adequate ability to indemnify the District, all users shall furnish the District a policy of insurance coverage naming the District (and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, when applicable) as coinsured. The coverage shall indemnify the District against any loss or damage as may be required by the District but not less than $250,000/$1,000,000 for liability and $250,000 for property damage, all as further described in the lease document to be entered into by applicant. Applicant will also be required to provide a policy of fire and extended coverage insurance. The amount of the insurance will be dependent on the full replacement value of the channel cover and appurtenant structures. C. CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS Types of Overbuilding The methods introduce here serve as a general guidelines only. Each case is different and will have to be considered case by case. There are three basic methods of overbuilding (see pages 11, 12, and 13 of Section 1). Method "A" is to keep the cover above the channel as low as possible and do away with District access roads and fences. Method "B" is to keep the structure well above the top of the channel so as to allow continuous access to the channel for cleaning and maintenance of the channel, recreational trails, and transportation or utility corridors. In general, Method "A" can be used for channels less than 25 feet wide. Method "B" can be used for channels over 60 feet wide. Method "A" may be used for channels between 25 feet and 60 feet wide if it can be shown to the District's satisfaction that no special side drainage, channel maintenance, recreation, or corridor use problems exist. Method "C" is for building over underground conduits. -3- 2. Criteria for Design and Analysis of Overbuilding Plans and calculations submitted for overbuilding must be signed by a civil or structural engineer licensed to practice in the State of California. Cover systems, protective devices, and conduits shall be designed and/or analyzed based on loads and criteria consistent with the intended use of the area, but shall result in a system not less than one meeting the following requirements: a. Dead Loads: Earth Loads: Vertical and lateral loads are to be in accordance with the District's Structural Design Manual. Overburden must be shown on the drawings. Structure Loads: The loads to be used are the actual direct loads or as transmitted through earth fill as determined by a recognized method (e.g. Bousinesq). b. Live Loads: Railroad Bridges or Crossings: Cooper E Loads are to be determined by servicing or franchised railroad. Distribution of loads and impact is to be as shown in District's Structural Design Manual. Highway Bridges, Street Crossing, and Ingress and Egress Routes: HS -20 truck loading with impact in accordance with ASSHTO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges is to be used. Parking or Exterior Storage: A uniform load consistent with type of storage or parking is to be used, 100 psf minimum, plus one HS -20 truck with impact, placed at locations to provide maximum stresses. The uniform load does not have to occupy the area of the truck. Minimum truck impact shall be 10 percent of the live load. Interior Storage and Other Structures: The load shall be consistent with use as accepted by the jurisdictional Building Department. Other Areas not Normally Accessible by Vehicles or Covered by a Structure: H-15 truck with impact of at least 10 percent is to be used. C. Wide and Seismic Loads: The loads are to be as accepted by the jurisdictional Building Department. -4- d. Design Methods and Stresses: Railroad Bridges or Crossing: Design is to be in accordance with the AREA Manual for Railroad Engineering. Highway Bridges, Street Crossings, and Ingress and Egress Routes: Design is to be in accordance with the AASHTO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges. Concrete design may be either working stress or strength in accordance with American Concrete ACI 318 except that load factors for strength design shall be per AASHTO. Concrete structures maintained by the District are to be analyzed using the working stress method only. All Others: Design is to be in accordance with the AISC Manual of Steel Construction, Nation Design Specification for stress -grade lumber or ACI 318, as appropriated, nothing that concrete structures maintained by the District are to be analyzed using the working stress method. e. Foundations: Directly on drain: 1) Structure must be removable if not required for stability of the drain. 2) The storm drain must not be over -stressed by the structure. An engineering analysis of all elements of the storm drain structure must be submitted. The analysis is to be based on methods and loads shown in the District's Structural Design Manual in addition to surcharge loads due to permit work. 3) Where appropriate, a soil investigation and report will be required. Independent but Surcharge Drain (including surcharge fill): 1) Same as No. 2 above. 2) The structure must provide a minimum of 6 -inches horizontal clearance from any element of the drain, including subdrain pipes and at least 18 - inches vertical clearance from a box or pipe conduit, and 6 -inches vertical clearance from an open channel. 3) A soils engineer must analyze the foundation. Analysis is to include a soil investigation and report. Exploratory excavations must extend below foundation. Analysis must also include uplift pressures on the invert where appropriate. -5- No Effect on Drain: 1) Same as No. 2 and 3, above (independent but surcharge drain). Piles must be sleeved, as necessary; to prevent drag forces on the drain and bearing areas must be sufficiently deep so as not to produce uplift pressures. 2) The hydraulic capacity of flood control facility will have to be maintained. Normally, no construction will be allowed below the top of the channel walls if it encroaches within the design freeboard area. Types of structure for the covering will be specified to allow for standardizing the types of construction whenever possible. 3) The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is conducting a hydrologic study of various drainage areas (LACDA project). Therefore, any proposed development may have to provide for existing channels to be widened or for channel walls to be heightened. The District will provide information relative to the status and/or requirements of this study or other controls that must be met. 4) Any proposed development should provide a means for local run-off to enter the channel after said channel has been covered. Side drainage problems also should be investigated where a channel is below the surrounding ground level and existing side drains are inadequate or designed to a lesser frequency than the main channel. In these cases, interested parties will be required to do one or all of the following: (1) construct additional drainage inlets, (2) leave a section of channel uncovered, or (3) use Method "B" for overbuilding (see page 13). Channel covering usually requires that access facilities to the channel invert be constructed also. See Section D, Operational Requirements, for more information. Aesthetic Requirements Surface structures shall be constructed to be aesthetically compatible with the area and District's facilities based on current standards and economic feasibility. Landscaping or other aesthetic measures may be required to mitigate the impact of structures on its environs. D. OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS To optimize safety and ensure the hydraulic and structural integrity of a particular flood control channel, the District and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers have a number of operational requirements that must be met by every joint use proposal. The following is a list of the major requirements. Please note that this list should not be considered complete or absolute. The requirements are: Access into a covered channel is required every 500 feet. This access is usually of a pedestrian nature and could be in the form of manholes, ladders, etc. Adequate clearances inside the channel (a minimum height of channel wall) must be maintained throughout the channel for the transportation of heavy equipment used in channel repair, bridge, and bridge abutment repair, etc. In the event the channel is to be covered, adequate ventilation must be provided to prevent the build-up of noxious or volatile fumes. A short reach of the channel, 30 feet or so, to remain uncovered, thereby aiding channel maintenance and repair in that equipment and material could be lowered into or removed from the channel. E. RIGHT OF WAY AVAILABILITY Operating Right of Way a. Fee Title Generally, joint uses may be authorized on rights of way held in fee by the District. However, there may be legal encumbrances in the form of prior easements, leases, and rental agreements, which may have to be cured prior to the proposed joint use. Also, "paper streets" or unused easements for public street purposes may exist. There also may be other conditions, covenants, and restrictions to the District's title. Since perfecting title is very time-consuming, all proposals for joint use should be submitted as early as possible for right of way clearance. b. Much of the District's right of way is in the form of flood control easements. Where long reaches of fee are interspersed with short reaches of easements, it may be economically feasible to acquire the underlying fee. C. All costs attendant to perfecting title or acquiring the underlying fee will be borne by the proposed developer or public agency. Excess Right of Way District has, in addition to its operating right of way, excess property holdings, both in fee and easement. In most instances, the fee property can be incorporated into the joint use proposal. For an easement area, approval of the underlying fee owner will be required. F. OTHER REQUIREMENTS 1. Where the applicant is a private organization, after approval of the concept by the District, for fee -owned rights of way, an agreement to lease (option) will be entered into between District and applicant. This will give the applicant assurance that the right of way is available for consideration by the applicant as to duration and terms. 2. In addition to the General Provisions of District's standard permit to be issued for construction, special provisions my be required because of the nature, design, or location of proposed installation. 3. Construction must commence within six months of date of permit unless otherwise approved by Chief Engineer and be completed in accordance with an approved schedule. 4. Construction work within the channel rights of way involving removal and restoration of the channel structure, excavation, and backfill shall be accomplished during the period of April 15 to October 15. 5. As -built drawings and installation of identification markers for subsurface structures will be required by the District. Markers must not be placed so as to interfere with use of District's vehicular service roads. -7- Any relocation of survey monuments defining District's right of way boundaries will be performed by District's surveyors with the permittee underwriting the costs of such relocation. G. DOCUMENTS The District will allow overbuilding and use of air rights by a long-term lease over fee -owned property. These lease documents will provide for protection of the District's interest if nonpayment occurs, liability, etc. The leave will contain requirements that will protect the District's interest and provide for rental income. The District will monitor the lease throughout its term to ensure compliance with provisions. The term of the lease will be for a period long enough for a developer to amortize the cost of covering the channel and his construction loan, plus an additional time period (usually ten years) to obtain a return on his investment. The amortization of the cost to cover the channel may be reflected in the rent. The rent will be based on Fair Rental Value (FRV) of the property. If the appraisal approach considers channel cover as an on-site improvement, there will not be an amortization period for the cost of cover. Periodically, increases in rent based on fixed step increases or changes in the Wholesale Price Index (WPI) or periodic review of FRV, as the situation calls for, will be assessed. The lease will contain an option period to provide a developer time to complete the environmental considerations, complete the permit process, and obtain a lender. Where District has easement rights, overbuilding by the underlying fee owner can most likely be handled by permit with some type of mutually agreed upon maintenance agreement. In addition, because the District's easement for flood control purposes is, in some instances, tantamount to having the fee ownership, compensation will be required from the permittee because of the reduction in the District's use of its right of way to that of an easement for a covered drain; i.e., loss of surface use. Should the permittee be someone other than the underlying fee owner, evidence of approval of the fee owner would also be required. H. PROCEDURE TO BE FOLLOWED FOR USE OF DISTRICT'S FACILITIES BY OTHERS Prospective users must submit a written application for overbuilding or covering of open channels for proposed surface use and/or air rights use. This application should be addressed to: Los Angeles County Department of Public Works Construction Division Permits and Subdivisions Section - 8t" Floor 900 South Fremont Avenue Alhambra, CA 91803-1331 Early application, particularly for a major installation, is recommended. The following information is required: a. Six sets of preliminary drawings showing the location of the proposed covering, the desired surface use, the existing flood control facilities and stationing, and the District's right of way. b. Owner of proposed improvement. C. Preliminary construction program. d. Required time of land use. In District's review will be to determine the overall acceptability of the proposal and, if readily available, the approximate annual cost for leasing should the District's property be fee owned. If the District responds favorable to this application, a meeting will be arranged with the applicant and representatives of the District's Mapping and Property Management Division to discuss the criteria to be used for submittal of preliminary plans and general terms for leasing the District's properties and/or maintenance responsibilities. Applicant shall submit six sets of preliminary plans and design calculations, structural and hydraulic, if necessary for approval, and two copies of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (if required by an appropriate authority) when available. At this time, a deposit for the plan review will be required. The fees for checking of plans for covering of channels, including structural or hydraulic or other review as deemed necessary by the District are based on the current fee schedule adopted by the Board of Supervisors. Presently the fees are: Case I; clear span, actual cost to the District ($500 min.) and Case II; all others, actual cost to the District ($600 min.). After preliminary plans have been approved, a final submittal must be made prior to issuance of construction permit. This final submittal should contain the following: a. Four sets of final construction plans signed by a civil or structural engineer licensed to practice in California, showing proposed covering of channel. Plans should show existing improvements (both District and foreign in the construction area) and proposed improvements over proposed covering, District right of way limits, working areas, existing utilities, etc. In connection therewith, applicant will be responsible for inspecting the right of way, searching all available records, and ascertaining all foreign users of the rights of way. The District will aid in providing all its information regarding permits issued by the District. b. Inspection fees\deposits are based upon estimated actual cost determined by District; should the cost be less, the District will refund the difference. If the cost is more, applicant will submit additional amount. Upon review and approval of the final submittal, and payment of all fees, including deposit for first year's rental for leases, District will issue a construction permit. Approval of construction will be valid only to the extent of District jurisdiction. Also, the District may require a performance bond and liability insurance to protect the District's interest. 4. After the District responds favorably to this application, an Agreement to Lease (option) can be entered into between District and applicant. This commitment will be honored by the District for a period of one full year or longer, if so specified in the Agreement. At this time, the applicant will be required to deposit funds for preparation of the Agreement and the appraisal to determine the annual lease cost. These costs will be credited to applicant in the first year's rent should lease be finalized, otherwise the fees deposited will be waived. Note: In the event the applicant needs to know the cost prior to preparation of preliminary plans and finalization of the lease arrangement, applicant will be required to deposit funds for the District's cost for the work. Cost will be credited for first year's rent as stated above. Applicant may proceed with construction under terms and conditions of the permit. Construction must be initiated within one year of the date of issuance of permit unless otherwise approved by the Chief Engineer. The District will prepare the appropriate document or lease, in accordance with the terms of the Agreement previously entered into. In Upon completion of construction, one set of reproducible as -built drawings shall be submitted to the District within 180 days. In the event time warrants, one document only (lease) may be sued for the right of way negotiations. The document should be fully executed (signed by both parties) prior to submittal of final plans and before a construction permit is issued. Execution of the lease first is satisfactory with District provided applicant understands and accepts the fact that the plan review and issuance of the permit takes 30 to 60 days to complete. If there is a deadline for the applicant, the plans should include this time period. O:\Section\Permits\Flood\M aster\G U I DELI N ES -OV E R -AI RIG HTS.doc -10- I. EXAMPLES OF OVERBUILDING Pr;ction Pose flu- I ; re o Ccisson 4 TYPE OF OVERBUILDING METHap A LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Construction 07v;sicr-. -11- I ME TYPE OF OVERBUILDING MFTHQB Fricticn Pile Out ine o-;— Ca:550n LOS ANGELES COUNTY OEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Construction OiViSiOn PER41T AND SUBDIVISIONS SECTION Subcrc:n ;min] -12- Project No. Dote Preperea by P;cure: 05/02/2000 jll Fraction Piie ---* Out I i ne o4 ^-- C❑iSSQn I� TYPE OF OVERBUILDING METHOD "A" 18" M',n LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Construction D;vi5iol PEPV- ANO S,;eDIVIS[ONS SEC. -1C.% 1 1 EXIST;NG DRAIN -'-----I P-'OjeCT No -13- De Te Preocrec Dyt Attachment D Urban Freeway Cap Parks Urban Freeway Cap Parks Policy Briefing Paper Considering the Barriers and Opportunities for More Park Space in Los Angeles Project ID #103 I/ F'r c 0\, a Prepared by: Clement Lau, AICP Candidate, Doctor of Policy, Planning, and Development University of Southern California Prepared for: Los Angeles Sustainability Collaborative DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this paper and related materials are those of the author's alone, and do not reflect the opinions of the Los Angeles Sustainability Collaborative, its Board Members, or any employer thereof. The Los Angeles Sustainability Collaborative is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied in this paper, and reference herein to any specific product, process, policy, trade name, trademark, individual, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the LASC, it's Board Members, or any employer thereof. TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Executive Summary 2 1. Introduction 3 2. Problem and Background 3 3. Pros and Cons of Capping Freeways to Create Park Space 7 4. Examples of Existing Freeway Cap Parks 9 5. Current Status of Proposed Cap Parks in Los Angeles County 11 6. Implementation 15 7. Conclusion 19 References 20 Table Page 1. Total Parks and Open Space as Percentage of City Area 4 2. Children's Park Access in Seven Major Cities 5 3. Summary of Pros and Cons of Cap Parks 7 4. Examples of Cap Parks 9 5. Major Cap Park Proposals in Los Angeles County 12 Figure Page 1. Public Parks and Open Space in Los Angeles 4 2. Neighborhoods with the Greatest Need for New Parks 6 3. Freeway Park 9 4. South River Walk Park 10 5. Hance Park 10 6. Rose Kennedy Greenway 11 7. Major Cap Park Proposals in Los Angeles County 12 8. Hollywood Central Park 13 9. PARK 101 District 14 10. Cap Park at Ocean AvenueAth Street 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This policy briefing paper is the product of more than just my own efforts. Special thanks to all those who have provided valuable feedback and support: my wife Susan; Dr. David Sloane of the USC School of Policy, Planning, and Development; David Berneman and Mara Elana Burstein of the Los Angeles Sustainability Collaborative; Vaughan Davies of AECOM; Gerdo Aquino of SWA Group; Professor Andrea Hricko of the USC Keck School of Medicine; Laurie Goldman of Friends of the Hollywood Central Park; and Julie Yom. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Cap parks, also referred to as highway or deck parks, are parks built over segments of freeways that are below grade. Four major cap park proposals are currently being considered in the Los Angeles region, including the Hollywood Central Park, PARK 101 in downtown, and two smaller cap parks in Santa Monica. This policy briefing paper is intended to help policy makers, environmental advocates, and the general public to better understand cap parks, and the associated environmental and public health issues. Specifically, this paper offers a background on the shortage of public parks in the Los Angeles region, discusses the pros and cons of cap parks, studies four examples of cap parks built elsewhere, describes current cap park proposals, and addresses the barriers and constraints to implementing cap parks in the Los Angeles region. The lack of public parks in Los Angeles is an issue that demands urgent attention. Nearly two out of three children in Los Angeles County do not live within walking distance (one-quarter mile) of a park, playground or open space. These children are more likely to be obese and are at higher risk of developing asthma, diabetes, or obesity related diseases. Los Angeles needs more parks and open spaces to meet the recreation and public health needs of its residents, especially children. Capping segments of freeways to create park space is one way to address the shortage of parks in the region. Like any proposed solution to a problem, the idea of cap parks has both pros and cons. Capping segments of freeways is a good way to create large new parks in urban areas where vacant land is scarce. By building on unused space over freeways, creation of cap parks will not displace residences or businesses and can reconnect neighborhoods or communities divided by freeways. Large cap parks have the potential to generate economic benefits, including enhanced values to adjacent properties, attraction of businesses and visitors, and creation of new jobs. Political and business leaders are particularly eager to advocate for and support visions of large new parks. Los Angeles has the benefit of learning from the experiences of other cities where cap parks have been built. The four examples studied in this paper offer insights as to the potential benefits and challenges with the implementation of cap park projects of varying sizes at diverse locations. Construction costs will be high for new cap parks, especially large ones. Operation and maintenance costs will also be significant for large cap parks given their size and amenities. Time and process required for cap park development will be lengthy and complicated. Feasibility, environmental, economic, and other studies must be completed before actual construction begins. In addition, cap parks may expose park users to potential health risks related to air quality and noise. However, these impacts could be addressed through innovative park design and other mitigation measures. As land has become increasingly scarce in Los Angeles, we need creative and resourceful planning solutions to meet the park and recreational needs of the population. Cap parks offer hope and benefits that simply cannot be ignored. In particular, larger cap parks have the potential to: improve regional air quality; help reduce obesity and its associated problems; create short- and long-term jobs; raise adjacent property values; and enhance the overall quality of life. While they can be costly and complex projects that are challenging to implement, cap parks represent a strategy that must be seriously considered to promote sustainability, address the need for more parkland, and reconnect neighborhoods that have been fragmented as a result of freeway construction. 2 1. INTRODUCTION Cap parks, also referred to as highway or deck parks, are parks built over segments of freeways that are below grade. Four major cap park proposals are currently being considered in the Los Angeles region, including the Hollywood Central Park, PARK 101 in downtown, and two smaller cap parks in Santa Monica. This policy briefing paper is intended to help policy makers, environmental advocates, and the general public to better understand cap parks, and the associated environmental and public health issues. Specifically, this paper offers a background on the shortage of public parks in the Los Angeles region (Section 2), discusses the pros and cons of cap parks (Section 3), studies four examples of cap parks built elsewhere (Section 4), describes current cap park proposals (Section 5), and addresses the barriers and constraints to implementing cap parks in the Los Angeles region (Section 6). 2. PROBLEM AND BACKGROUND Problem The lack of public parks in Los Angeles is an issue that demands urgent attention. Nearly two out of three children in Los Angeles County do not live within walking distance (one-quarter mile) of a park, playground or open space.' These children are more likely to be obese and are at higher risk of developing asthma, diabetes, or obesity related disease.2 Los Angeles needs more parks and open spaces to meet the recreation and public health needs of its residents, especially children. Capping segments of freeways to create park space is one way to address the shortage of parks in the region and is the focus of this paper. Background In 1930, the firm Olmsted Brothers and Bartholomew & Associates submitted a report titled "Parks, Playgrounds, and Beaches in the Los Angeles Region" to the Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce.3 The report proposed a comprehensive and coherent network of parks, playgrounds, schools, beaches, forests, and transportation to promote the social, economic, and environmental vitality of Los Angeles and the health of its residents. The Olmsted -Bartholomew Plan was a model of visionary and bold planning commissioned at a time when land was available and the region's population was growing tremendously. However, the plan was never adopted and only segments of the report have been implemented to date due to a variety of political, economic, and financial reasons. Today, Los Angeles is one of the most park -poor cities in the United States. With only 10 percent of its total area devoted to parks and open space, Los Angeles lags behind all other major cities on the west coast (see Table 1) and ranks below New York and Philadelphia nationally. In addition, parks and open spaces are distributed unevenly in the region, with a significant portion of parkland located away from the urban core and underserved communities (see Figure 1). Griffith Park, for example, has an area of over 4,000 acres, but does not provide for the active recreation elements ' Trust for Public Land. (2004, November). No place to play: a comparative analysis of park access in seven major cities, p. 4. 2 Los Angeles County Department of Public Health (2007, October). Preventing childhood obesity: the need to create healthy places, p. 5. 3 Hise, G. & Deverell, W. (2000). Eden by Design: the 1930 Olmsted -Bartholomew Plan for the Los Angeles Region, p. 1. 3 typically available in an urban park.4 The park consists primarily of rugged hillsides and mountains, and is difficult to reach without a car. Table 1: Total Parks and Open Space as Percentage of City Area City City Area (in acres) Total Parks/Open Space (in acres) Park/Open Space as Percentage of City Area Los Angeles 300,352 30,121 10.0% Seattle 53,696 6,194 11.5% Portland 79,808 12,591 15.8% San Diego 207,360 36,108 17.4% San Francisco 29,888 7,594 25.4% Source: Harnik. 2000. Figure 1: Public Parks and Open Space in Los Angeles JUUIUC. I IUSI IUI r-UUIIU LdIIU, LUV'+. Another indicator of park needs in a community is access as measured by the percentage of children within walking distance or one-quarter mile of a park.5 Los Angeles offers its children the 4 Active recreation requires constructed facilities such as basketball courts and fields for soccer and football. M worst access to parks among the seven major cities evaluated.6 As shown in Table 2 below, only one-third of the city's children live within walking distance of a park. Table 2: Children's Park Access in Seven Major Cities City Percentage of children within one-quarter mile of a park Number of children not within one-quarter mile of a park Los Angeles Los Angeles County 33% 36% 657,700 1,694,400 Dallas 42% 182,800 San Diego 65% 102,300 Seattle 79% 18,600 San Francisco 85% 16,700 New York 91% 178,500 Boston 97% 2,900 Source: Trust for Public Land, 2004. Access to and availability of public facilities for physical activity, such as parks and playgrounds, has an important role in the prevention and treatment of obesity. Research shows that when people have access to parks, they are more likely to exercise, which can reduce obesity and its associated health risks and costs.' A number of studies reviewed in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine showed that "creation of or enhanced access to places for physical activity combined with informational outreach" produced a 48 percent increase in the frequency of physical activity.$ These studies also found that easy access to a place to exercise resulted in a five percent median increase in aerobic capacity, along with weight loss, a reduction in body fat, and improvements in flexibility.9 There are unfair park and health disparities in Los Angeles based on ethnicity, income, and access to cars.10 Children of color disproportionately live in communities of concentrated poverty without enough parks and playgrounds to play in, and do not have the means to reach parks in other neighborhoods. Figure 2 identifies neighborhoods in Los Angeles with the greatest need for new parks. These neighborhoods have high concentrations of residents under the age of 18 and have 5 Most cities and counties rely on National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA) standards to determine whether they have enough parks. These standards are expressed in terms of acres per 1,000 residents. While these standards are helpful as general measures of parkland availability, they were established decades earlier and do not accurately reflect the environment and variety of communities today. NRPA standards, for example, do not address access nor do they include many types of open space common in urban environments such as greenbelts and trails. In addition, these standards are silent on the issue of equity; the same standards are used regardless of whether a community is currently park -poor or park -rich. 6 Trust for Public Land. (2004, November). No place to play: a comparative analysis of park access in seven major cities, p. 6. Gies, E. (2006). The Health Benefits of Parks, p. 8. 8 Kahn, E. et al (2002). The Effectiveness of Interventions to Increase Physical Activity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, pp. 87-88. s Ibid. 10 Garcia, R. & White, A. (2006). Healthy Parks, Schools, and Communities: Mapping Green Access and Equity for Los Angeles Region, p. 3. W1 limited or no parks within walking distance. The health implications of the lack of physical activity are significant. Children in underserved communities are much more likely to suffer from obesity, diabetes, and other diseases related to inactivity.11 Garcia and White (2006) even declared that "this is the first generation in the history of this country in which children will have a lower life expectancy than their parents if present trends continue" (p. 3). Figure 2: Neighborhoods with the Greatest Need for New Parks Source: Trust for Public Land, 2004. Fortunately, a coalition of community-based environmental and social justice groups has emerged recently to lead efforts to address inequities in the provision of parks in the Los Angeles area.12 This coalition is trying to revive the Olmsted -Bartholomew vision and has experienced some success along the Los Angeles River and at nearby lands that were previously slated for non -park 11 Los Angeles County Department of Public Health (2007, October). Preventing childhood obesity: the need to create healthy places, p. 5. 12 This coalition was led by The City Project (formerly of the Center for Law in the Public Interest) and included (but not limited to): Friends of the Los Angeles River, Concerned Citizens of South Central Los Angeles, and the Catholic Archdiocese of Los Angeles. [e development. Specific examples include the Cornfield near Chinatown and Taylor Yard, both of which have been developed with State parks serving inner city residents. 13 In addition, the business community as well as planning and design professionals have advocated for large new urban cap parks in Los Angeles. One proposal is the "PARK 101" idea which calls for a new 100 -acre park district in downtown Los Angeles. 14 Another is the proposed 44 -acre Hollywood Central Park which has the support of the Hollywood Chamber of Commerce and numerous political leaders.15 Proponents of both proposals believe that the parks would offer economic benefits in addition to addressing the park deficit in Los Angeles, including: enhancing real estate values, attracting tourists and businesses, and creating jobs. Prominent park researcher Dr. John L. Crompton (2001) has demonstrated through his studies that the economic values of parks can be measured and their economic benefits can be realized through appropriate design, siting, maintenance, and marketing. 16 3. PROS AND CONS OF CAPPING FREEWAYS TO CREATE PARK SPACE Cap parks, also referred to as highway or deck parks, are parks built over segments of freeways that are below grade. Like any proposed solution to a problem, the idea of cap parks has both pros and cons as discussed below. Table 3: Summary of Pros and Cons of Cap Parks Pros Capping segments of freeways is a good way to create large new parks in urban areas where vacant land is scarce. It is very difficult, if not impossible, to acquire and assemble several acres of land in densely populated areas to create new parks. Major challenges include the high cost of land acquisition and community opposition, especially when displacement of residences and/or 13 More information regarding the Cornfield and Taylor Yard are provided in Arnold (2007)'s Fair and Healthy Land Use: Environmental Justice and Planning, pp. 112-113. 14 Davies, V. (2008, August). A "Central Park" for Los Angeles? Urban Land, 67(8), pp. 42-45. About 16 acres of the park district would be a cap over the 101 Freeway. 15 Hollywood Chamber of Commerce. (2007). Fact Sheet: Hollywood Freeway Central Park. 16 Crompton, J.L. (2001). Parks and economic development. Pros Cons ✓ Create large new parks in park -poor urban x Construction, operation, and maintenance areas costs are high for large cap parks ✓ Reconnect neighborhoods divided by freeways X Time and process required for park ✓ Enhance adjacent property values development will be lengthy ✓ Attract businesses and visitors X Only one or two large cap parks will likely be ✓ Create direct and indirect jobs pursued at a time due to costs and complexity of these projects ✓ Large park proposals appeal to a much x May expose park users to: 1) potential broader audience than smaller projects health risks related to air quality and noise; ✓ Build on successes of cap parks developed and 2) potential safety risks since pedestrian elsewhere access to cap parks may be dangerous X Cap parks may be taken over by the homeless Pros Capping segments of freeways is a good way to create large new parks in urban areas where vacant land is scarce. It is very difficult, if not impossible, to acquire and assemble several acres of land in densely populated areas to create new parks. Major challenges include the high cost of land acquisition and community opposition, especially when displacement of residences and/or 13 More information regarding the Cornfield and Taylor Yard are provided in Arnold (2007)'s Fair and Healthy Land Use: Environmental Justice and Planning, pp. 112-113. 14 Davies, V. (2008, August). A "Central Park" for Los Angeles? Urban Land, 67(8), pp. 42-45. About 16 acres of the park district would be a cap over the 101 Freeway. 15 Hollywood Chamber of Commerce. (2007). Fact Sheet: Hollywood Freeway Central Park. 16 Crompton, J.L. (2001). Parks and economic development. businesses is necessary. Cap parks provide a viable and superior alternative because the land or space above the freeway may be free, made available as air rights by the agency responsible for the freeway. By building on unused space over freeways, creation of cap parks will also not displace residences or businesses and can reconnect neighborhoods or communities divided by freeways. Large cap parks have the potential to generate economic benefits, including enhanced values to adjacent properties, attraction of businesses and visitors, and creation of new jobs. An example is Hance Park in Phoenix which is surrounded by a growing number of upscale condominium towers. Large park proposals also appeal to a much broader audience than smaller projects. Political and business leaders are particularly eager to advocate for and support visions of large new parks. Such parks would not only meet recreational needs, but also help to upgrade or improve the image of cities. Millennium Park, for example, has elevated the status of Chicago and may be considered to be the city's most important project since the World's Columbian Exposition of 1893." Los Angeles has the benefit of learning from the experiences of other cities where cap parks have been built. The four examples studied in this paper offer insights as to the potential benefits and challenges with the implementation of cap park projects of varying sizes at diverse locations. Cons Construction costs are high for cap parks, especially large ones. The State of New Jersey, for example, spent $150 million on the 6.5 -acre South River Walk Park. Not surprisingly, the proposed 44 -acre Hollywood Central Park has a price tag of nearly $1 billion. Operation and maintenance costs will also be significant for large cap parks given their size and amenities. Time and process required for cap park development will be lengthy. Feasibility, environmental, economic, and other studies must be completed before actual construction begins. During the construction phase, delays can also occur, as evidenced by Boston's now infamous "Big Dig" project also known as the Rose Kennedy Greenway. In addition, only one large cap park will likely be pursued at a time in a region due to the costs and complexity of these projects. It is unclear, for instance, whether the Hollywood Central Park and PARK 101 can occur simultaneously as both will impact traffic on the 101 Freeway. Cap parks may expose park users to potential health risks related to air quality and noise. Studies have shown both the adverse health impacts of living in close proximity to freeways and of driving in long tunnels due to exposure to poor air quality.'$ Also, noise is an issue of concern, especially in smaller cap parks. In addition, potential safety risks exist if access to cap parks is not properly designed to protect pedestrians from vehicular traffic around the parks. Like any park, cap parks may be subject to problems relating to crime and homelessness, if not properly managed and improved over time. For example, at one point Seattle's Freeway Park fell into disuse, resulting in the park becoming a place where crime occurred regularly and where the homeless took over. "The 24.5 -acre Millennium Park is not a freeway cap park, but is similar in that covers land previously occupied by rail yards and parking lots. Please visit http://www.miIlenniumpark.org/parkhistory/ for more information. 18 Please refer to sources cited later on page 18 of this policy paper. E:3 4. EXAMPLES OF EXISTING FREEWAY CAP PARKS A 2007 Trust for Public Land (TPL) study found that there are over 20 cap parks in the United States and at least a dozen more in various stages of planning.19 The average size of the country's cap parks is nine acres and each covers an average of 1,620 linear feet of highway. Summarized in Table 4 and described below are four examples of completed cap parks. Table 4: Examples of Cap Parks Park Name Freeway Park South River Walk Park Hance Park Rose Kennedy Greenway Location Seattle, WA Trenton, NJ Phoenix, AZ Boston, MA Tunnel Length (linear feet) 528 898 2,640 5,280 Park Size (acres) 5.2 6.5 10.0 30.0 Highway 1-5 U.S. 29 1-10 1-93 Source: Harnik, 2010. Freeway Park (5.2 acres) Seattle, Washington Seattle's Freeway Park was created to draw together city neighborhoods divided by Interstate 5.20 When Freeway Park was completed in 1976, it was hailed as a major architectural and engineering accomplishment. Designed by the world-renowned firm of Lawrence Halprin & Associates, it was the first park to be constructed over a freeway. The idea for a downtown park over the freeway is as old as the Seattle segment of Interstate 5 itself. In 1966 civic - minded individuals and the city, county, and state officials were already talking about constructing a cap over the below -grade portion separating First Hill from downtown. The park was developed with bond money, as well as county, state and federal funding. Figure 3: Freeway Park Freeway Park is intended to provide a gathering Source: http://www.bing.com/maps/ place for residents, shoppers, downtown office workers, hotel visitors, and the rest of the downtown population. Initially, the park was actively programmed with lunchtime and evening concerts. Over the years, however, as programming became more limited, the park fell into disuse. As the vegetation matured and cut sightlines, the park became darker, more difficult to navigate, and even dangerous. Seattle's growing drug -using 19 Harnik, P. & Welle, B. (2007, April). Nature over traffic. Urban Land, 66(4), p. 102; Harnik, P. (2010). Urban Green: Innovative Parks for Resurgent Cities, pp. 136-137. Other examples of cap parks not covered in this policy paper include: Riverwalk Plaza (Hartford, CT); Memorial Park (La Canada Flintridge, CA); Lytle Park (Cincinnati, OH); Waterside Park (Atlantic City, NJ); Gateway Park (Arlington, VA); Mid -City Bridge Park Deck (San Diego, CA); Capitol Reflecting Pool (Washington, D.C.); 1-95 Park & Memorial Parks (two parks in Philadelphia, PA); Carl Schurz Park (New York); Sam Smith Park (Seattle, WA); and Rose Garden, Lake Place, Cooke Plaza (3 parks in Duluth, MN). 20 http://www.cityofseattle.net/parks/park_detai1.asp?ID=312 17 and drug -selling population, as well as its homeless population, also found a home in Freeway Park. Various physical and other improvements have been made to address these problems. Today, the park is in better shape and well -used by office workers during the day. Acoustics is an issue at Freeway Park. Due in part to its relatively small size (5.2 acres), park users are subject to a constant white noise caused by traffic. While the sound is not obtrusive, it is not minimal either.21 South River Walk Park (6.5 acres) Trenton, New Jersey South River Walk Park is located above the Route 29 tunnel and was gifted to the Mercer County Park Commission in 2004 by the State of New Jersey. 22 The 6.5 -acre park focuses on the history of Trenton and its connection to the Delaware River. The park is home to five arches of materials which represent various eras of the city from pre -revolutionary through the Industrial Revolution to the modern era. The park has hosted many festivals and art fairs as well as weddings, walk-a- thons and family events. The State of New Jersey spent $150 million on the South River Walk Park. According to Trenton Planning Director Andrew Carten, "The project resulted in a significant Figure 4: South River Walk Park spike in interest and sale prices of property. After all, Source: http://www.binq.com/maps/ would you rather look over 600 trucks barreling past every day, or a scenic park and river?" One lot with a value of $120,000 prior to park construction was developed with six housing units that sold for $200,000 each. The park also helped attract a new 82 -unit market -rate residential development.23 Figure 5: Hance Park Hance Park (10 acres) Phoenix, Arizona Opened in 1992, the Margaret T Hance Park is located in central Phoenix. The park is built on top of the 1-10 tunnel and is named after Margaret T. Hance, former mayor of Phoenix. The park is home to the a Japanese Tea House and Friendship --� Garden, the Irish Cultural Center, and _ 1T the annual St. Patrick's Day Irish Family Faire. i Source: http://www.bing.com/maps/ 21 Harnik, P. (2010). Urban Green: Innovative Parks for Resurgent Cities, p. 138. 22 http://www.state.nj.us/counties/mercer/commissions/park/miIlyard.htm1 23 Harnik, P. (2010). Urban Green: Innovative Parks for Resurgent Cities, p. 139. 24 http://phoenix.about.com/library/blmaphancedeckpark.htm 10 At ten acres, Hance Park is not as impacted by noise or acoustic issues as Seattle's Freeway Park. Labeled by the Phoenix New Times "a rare Phoenix instance of nature over traffic—in this case, literally," Hance Park is decked over the Papago Freeway, uniting uptown and downtown and providing a park next to the central library. The freeway was originally planned as an elevated bridge through downtown, but community opposition killed that idea in a 1973 ballot measure. It was not until ten years later that the city finally accepted a below -grade solution with the park as a key added amenity. As a sign of its success, the park has spurred efforts to revitalize the surrounding downtown area, including construction of market rate and affordable housing and the expansion and/or renovation of local museums.25 Rose Kennedy Greenway (30 acres) Boston, Massachusetts Opened in 2008, the Rose Kennedy Greenway is a roughly 1.5 -mile -long series of parks and public spaces created in downtown Boston.26 It is the final part of the massive Central Artery/Tunnel Project (CA/T) or Big Dig that put 1-93 underground and removed the elevated freeway that served as the main highway through downtown for more than 40 years. The Greenway was named in honor of Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy and officially dedicated in 2004. Officials originally predicted a 2005 completion date for the park components of the Greenway. However, due to numerous delays, cost overruns, and the Big Dig ceiling collapse, the parks were not completed until 2007. As the Greenway runs above an interstate highway, the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority retains Figure 6: Rose Kennedy Greenway ownership of most of the land. The non-profit Rose Source: http://www.bing.com/maps/ Fitzgerald Kennedy Greenway Conservancy has been created jointly by the Turnpike Authority, the City of Boston, and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts to oversee maintenance, fundraising, and programming of the Greenway parks. The $14 -billion price tag of the CA/T has caused some people to question the financial feasibility of cap parks. However, it should be noted that this was primarily a transportation project and included major bridges and underwater tunnels. About $40 million (of the $14 billion) was actually spent on the mile -long stretch of the four parks that make up the Greenway.27 5. CURRENT STATUS OF PROPOSED CAP PARKS IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY Civic and business leaders, planners, and architects have proposed several cap parks in Los Angeles County. Los Angeles seems ideal for new cap parks. Its extensive network of freeways, including numerous below -grade segments, translates to various locations that may be capped with new parks. The region's four major cap park proposals are summarized in Table 5. 25 AECOM. (2010, August). PARK 101 District Feasibility Study, p. 4-8. 26 http://www.rosekennedygreenway.org/ 27 Harnik, P. (2010). Urban Green: Innovative Parks for Resurgent Cities, pp. 139-140. 11 + � o 4A R o. -9 tiR �, 16,71- �:� -7rt • - ` � - ?.. - � a -,, Vk - ra+p .6... t + o-", ownership of most of the land. The non-profit Rose Source: http://www.bing.com/maps/ Fitzgerald Kennedy Greenway Conservancy has been created jointly by the Turnpike Authority, the City of Boston, and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts to oversee maintenance, fundraising, and programming of the Greenway parks. The $14 -billion price tag of the CA/T has caused some people to question the financial feasibility of cap parks. However, it should be noted that this was primarily a transportation project and included major bridges and underwater tunnels. About $40 million (of the $14 billion) was actually spent on the mile -long stretch of the four parks that make up the Greenway.27 5. CURRENT STATUS OF PROPOSED CAP PARKS IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY Civic and business leaders, planners, and architects have proposed several cap parks in Los Angeles County. Los Angeles seems ideal for new cap parks. Its extensive network of freeways, including numerous below -grade segments, translates to various locations that may be capped with new parks. The region's four major cap park proposals are summarized in Table 5. 25 AECOM. (2010, August). PARK 101 District Feasibility Study, p. 4-8. 26 http://www.rosekennedygreenway.org/ 27 Harnik, P. (2010). Urban Green: Innovative Parks for Resurgent Cities, pp. 139-140. 11 Table 5: Major Cap Park Proposals in Los Angeles County Cap Park Proposal Hollywood Central PARK 101 Santa Monica Cap Parks Park Location/Freeway Hollywood Downtown L.A. Santa Monica Santa Monica Above the 101 Freeway Above the 101 Freeway, Above the 10 Above the 10 between Sunset & between Union Station and Freeway, Freeway, Hollywood Boulevard Grand Avenue between between 14th Ocean Avenue & 17th Streets & 4th Street Park Size 44 acres 16 acres above freeway; 5 acres 7 acres 100 acres total Total Cost $950 million $328 million for the cap above $87 million To be freeway determined Sources: AECOM, 2010; V. Davies, 2010; City of Santa Monica, 2010. Figure 7 identifies the location of the proposed cap parks in relation to those neighborhoods with limited access to parks or other open space as identified by the Trust for Public Land. Figure 7: Major Cap Park Proposals in Los Angeles County r � - Hollywood Ic Central Park t _ } Is k •� . x,71 _ _ if Ij I� s t4i� Santa Monica Cap Parks 1 _ sr - -7 kY Sources: Trust for Public Land, 2004; AECOM, 2010; City of Santa Monica, 2010. 12 Hollywood Central Park The Hollywood Central Park proposal is the construction of a cap over the U.S. 101 Freeway, between Hollywood and Santa Monica Boulevards, as the freeway travels below grade through the heart of Hollywood. By capping a portion of the Hollywood Freeway, this project will create a much-needed street -level 44 -acre public park in one of the lowest resident -to -park space communities in California. Hollywood has 0.005 acres of open space per resident as compared to 0.012 acres within the City of Los Angeles. In addition, the project would reunite diverse communities and dense neighborhoods, separated for more than 50 years, by the Hollywood Freeway. Figure 8: Hollywood Central Park Source: http://www.hollywoodfreewaycentralpark.org/ At 44 acres, the park is a large project with the potential to strengthen the economy through job creation, increased tourism, and enhanced property values around the park. The park would also encourage participation in physical exercise and provide green open space and recreational facilities to more than 40,000 children, a majority of who live in apartments. From a traffic engineering standpoint, the project would also be desirable because it would: make long -needed ramp improvements; streamline freeway functioning; and improve freeway overpasses. Of the four cap park proposals in Los Angeles County, the Hollywood Central Park is the furthest along; AECOM completed a feasibility study for this project in 2008. The Friends of Hollywood Central Park has been very active in its efforts to make the park a reality, including lobbying political leaders at all levels, raising support and funds, and coordinating with Caltrans on the required environmental impact studies. The group has even retained a consultant to provide a preliminary study on the Hollywood Central Park's potential return on investment. PARK 101 PARK 101 was initially the vision of a group of college students from around the world who participated in EDAW Inc.'s Intern Program in June 2008.28 The interns were asked this question: "How can we reconnect the City's historic core north of the Hollywood Freeway with the civic, cultural and financial centers to the south?" Their solution, PARK 101, is a vision for a 100 -acre urban park district serving downtown and adjacent neighborhoods such as Chinatown and Little Tokyo, all of which lack adequate open space. It would involve building a 16 -acre cap above a portion of the Hollywood Freeway and its exit ramps. This proposal would also incorporate nearby parking lots and underused land next to the freeway, and reconfigure the Civic Center area— converting an eyesore into an urban park and a walkable, vibrant neighborhood. This project provides a unique opportunity to shape a new direction for downtown. Focused on a relatively small area straddling the 101 Freeway and situated in an existing maze of roadways, 28 EDAW is now a part of AECOM (http://www.aecom.com/), an international provider of professional technical and management support services to a broad range of markets, including transportation, facilities, environmental, energy, water and government. 13 PARK 101 can remake Los Angeles into a more sustainable and livable city. According to AECOM, the PARK 101 proposal focuses on six design principles: maximizing regional connectivity; developing a pedestrian focus; providing flexibility of open space; reconnecting communities; being a regenerative tool; and creating a "Wow" factor. PARK 101 is not just a cap over a Figure 9: PARK 101 District freeway. Proponents of PARK 101 envision a new park district that mends the fragmentation of the City's central core. The design of the park is based on the extension and intersection of disconnected street grids on both sides of the freeway, as well as the opportunities inherent at Union Station and its future high speed rail component. The points of intersections and the axial vistas connecting key landmarks such as the Cathedral of Our Lady of the Angels, Union Station, and the Los Angeles River generate a series of links that create shapes for different programmatic components, and create the alignments and forms that give shape to the park. Source: AECOM, 2010. The vision of PARK 101 will be very costly to realize: $328 million for the cap park portion alone.29 However, the project will be built in five phases and will offer adjacent "value creation opportunities" in the form of new real estate developments that create value where it does not currently exist. A feasibility study by AECOM indicates that every dollar of the public investment in PARK 101 would spur $1.25 in new private development, which is not otherwise likely to occur.so Anticipated new development in the Park sub -district includes an estimated 1.0 to 1.9 million square feet of hotel, office, and retail space and 600 to 800 new residential units worth an additional $490 million. In addition to 2,800 to 3,500 one-time construction jobs, the PARK 101 district is expected to create 2,800 to 6,000 new permanent jobs. Santa Monica Cap Parks The City of Santa Monica is proposing to cap two portions of the 10 Freeway: between Ocean Avenue and 4th Street and between 14th and 17th Streets. The first project would tie together Main Street with downtown Santa Monica, while the second would function as a green space near 14th and 17th Streets. According to city staff, momentum is building for both projects. 29 According to AECOM (2010), the total estimated cost of the infrastructure investment for the PARK 101 district is approximately $825 million, and is distributed among the three sub -areas: $385 million for the Park Sub -District (includes the cap park component); $300 million for the Station Sub -District; and $135 million for the River Sub -District. s0 AECOM. (2010, August). PARK 101 District Feasibility Study, p. 1-11. 14 Between Ocean Avenue and 4th Street: As part of the city's implementation of the Civic Center Specific Plan, this capping project would extend the McClure Tunnel and cover the 10 Freeway from 4th Street to Ocean Avenue, offering an enlarged green space for outdoor enjoyment. The five - acre freeway cap would improve connection between downtown Santa Monica and the Civic Center. Specifically, the cap would improve public access to the new Palisades Garden Walk and Town Square Project. With an Expo Line light rail station at Colorado Avenue and 4th Street scheduled to be completed by 2015, the project could also enhance walkability by providing a pedestrian connection between Third Street Promenade, Santa Monica Place, and Main Street. A preliminary study indicates that the project would cost about $87 million. AECOM is currently completing a full feasibility study for this project.31 Figure 10: Cap Park at Ocean Avenue/4th Street Sources: City of Santa Monica, 2010; The LookOut news, 2010. Between 14th and 17th Streets: This seven -acre cap park is envisioned as an opportunity to expand open space, explore joint development, and reconnect neighborhoods that were broken by the construction of the freeway. This park would also be located near the future Expo Line station at Memorial Park, which is located on Olympic Boulevard between 14" and 16th Streets, just north of the freeway. The proposed park would reconnect the Pico neighborhood to the larger city fabric. The City received $250,000 in grant money from Caltrans to complete a feasibility study for this cap project. This study is one component of planning for the area which will include the Memorial Park Master Plan, the Expo light rail station area planning, and a future specific plan for the district as proposed in the city's Land Use and Circulation Element. 6. IMPLEMENTATION Funding Construction costs for large cap parks can be very high, as evidenced by the expected price tag of the Hollywood Central Park. Some may argue that numerous existing parks may be improved or upgraded using $950 million - the estimated cost of creating the Hollywood Central Park (not including any land acquisition costs). However, the land or space above the freeway may be free, made available as air rights by Caltrans. This can translate to a multimillion -dollar gift in urban locations. For example, land costs approximately $2 million to $3 million per acre near the Santa Ana Freeway by the Los Angeles City Hall.32 There would be no land costs if Caltrans agrees to 31 The City Council and Redevelopment Agency authorized the execution of a reimbursement agreement, in an amount not to exceed $3,156,508, using redevelopment funds to pay for costs associated with the freeway capping feasibility study, including engineering and constructability analysis, and the preparation of options for connecting the Civic Center and downtown over the freeway. 32 Harnik, P. & Welle, B. (2007, April). Nature over traffic. Urban Land, 66(4), p. 103. 15 make air rights above freeways available. This is not unlikely considering that Caltrans has identified itself as a key stakeholder involved in making PARK 101 a reality.33 In addition, there are various sources of local, state, and federal funds that can be obtained, particularly if an economic analysis shows that associated development will generate significantly more tax revenue. One approach is to create a tax increment financing district, whereby future increased tax revenue is used to pay back the costs of the park. The PARK 101 proposal, for example, is expected to offer adjacent "value creation opportunities" in the form of new real estate developments: the project is expected to spur $1.25 in new private development for every dollar of public investment. The project may also receive funding created to mitigate impacts related to the future development of high speed rail. Other local funding sources include public works capital funds or municipal bonds. The federal or state government often pays for the deck superstructure, while the city finances the actual park development. For example, the Trenton deck for the South River Walk Park came about through reconstruction of a state highway and was paid for by the State of New Jersey.34 Construction of large cap parks must be done in phases, as proposed for both the Hollywood Central Park and PARK 101. Incremental development allows park developers to build on early successes and to secure funding over a longer period of time. This approach also minimizes disruption to traffic and circulation during the construction period. Another aspect of funding is the cost of operating and maintaining the parks. While local parks and recreation departments are typically responsible for operation and maintenance, it would be beneficial to create a non-profit management organization for each large cap park. For instance, the non-profit Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy Greenway Conservancy was created to oversee maintenance, fundraising, and programming of the Greenway parks. Stakeholder Engagement The development of cap parks involves and affects a broad range of stakeholders: Residents in Underserved These residents live in communities without sufficient places to recreate and Communities, especially do not have the means to reach parks and school fields in other Children neighborhoods. They are the intended beneficiaries of strategies to increase the supply of parks in underserved neighborhoods. Business Interests Business interests support large urban parks with the potential to generate economic benefits: enhancing real estate values, attracting tourists and businesses, and creating jobs. For example, the Hollywood Chamber of Commerce is the key proponent of the Hollywood Central Park. Transportation Officials Transportation officials play a critical role in the development of cap parks because these parks would be developed above segments of freeways under their control. Caltrans is a key partner in all four cap park proposals. Local and State Politicians Local and state political representatives play a key role by advocating for new parks and securing funding for their development. For example, city, county, and state officials worked together to create Vista Hermosa Park, downtown's first new public park in many years .35 To be implemented, any new strategy to create new parks requires the backing of political leaders. 33 http://www.dot.ca.gov/dist07/travel/projects/park101/ 34 Harnik, P. (2010). Urban Green: Innovative Parks for Resurgent Cities, p. 141. 35 Vista Hermosa Park was built on a brownfield in downtown Los Angeles by the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy and the Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority in a joint -use partnership with LAUSD and the City of Los Angeles. The 10.5 -acre park restores some of the natural topography and native 16 Environmental Justice Environmental justice groups are the leaders of the urban parks movement in Groups Los Angeles. They seek to eliminate unfair park, school, and health disparities based on race, ethnicity, poverty, youth, and access to cars. These groups contributed significantly to the development of new parks at the Cornfield and Taylor Yard. Public Health Officials Public health officials generally support the development of new parks because they provide opportunities for physical activity, especially for children. However, public health experts must evaluate the potential health concerns of placing new parks at locations such as above freeways. Local Parks and Local parks and recreation departments provide parks and recreation Recreation Departments services, and will most likely be responsible for the operation and maintenance of any new cap parks, unless new non -profits are created for such purposes. State Parks Department State Parks helped make the new parks at the Cornfield and Taylor Yard and Conservancies possible. The Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy and the Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority contributed to the development of Vista Hermosa Park. All three will continue to partner with local agencies to provide new urban parks. Conservation and These groups support projects that protect and restore the natural Environmental Groups environment. For example, Friends of the Los Angeles River seeks to restore the river's natural habitat and develop bikeways, paths, and trails on the riverbanks. They typically favor passive recreational activities such as hiking, bird watching and nature study. Proper engagement of and cooperation between these stakeholders are critical to the success of the proposed cap parks. It is important to ensure that stakeholders understand the goals and anticipated benefits associated with the proposed parks. There are various forms of engagement and communication, including the community dialogue, news media, and simulation tools, which can provide a better understanding of the proposals, and demonstrate how the parks could impact quality of life and social equity. Political Will and Support Without political will and support, the proposed cap parks would be great ideas left unimplemented. Fortunately, all four projects have their fair share of supporters. The Friends of Hollywood Central Park, for example, has done an outstanding job of outreach and education, as evidenced by the long list of politicians supporting the project.36 PARK 101 is well -supported by public agencies37 and is described briefly in the Central City Community Plan, an official planning document prepared by the Los Angeles City Planning Department. However, the project will require more open and vocal support from one or more political champions to move forward, especially to work with Caltrans to streamline its review and permitting processes. As smaller projects, the Santa Monica cap parks do not require the same level of political support as the Hollywood and PARK vegetation of the area and features trails, streams, meadows, oak savannahs, picnic areas, art elements, an environmentally -themed children's adventure area, and a 120 -student capacity outdoor amphitheater. Built with state-of-the-art "green" technologies, the park enhances environmental and natural history educational opportunities for the adjacent high school, and provides a regulation soccer field for shared use by the school and the community. 36 Politicians include: Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, City Council members Eric Garcetti and Tom LaBonge, Congressman Xavier Becerra, Congresswoman Diane Watson, former State Senator and current County Supervisor Mark Ridley-Thomas, and California Assemblyman Mike Feuer. 37 Including Metro, SCAG, Caltrans, and CRA/LA. 17 101 proposals. Nevertheless, the two parks have received the blessing of city leaders who committed funding to study their feasibility. As of this writing, there are no vocal opponents to the four proposals. Understandably, some may be concerned about the high costs of cap parks and commuters may be uneasy about being stuck in tunnels for lengthy periods during traffic jams.38 Environmental and Public Health Impacts The environmental and public health impacts of the cap park proposals have not yet been comprehensively evaluated as required by California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Unfortunately, the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health also has not conducted any research on the potential public health impacts of cap parks .39 Nevertheless, it is logical to consider that because of their location, the proposed cap parks may expose future park users to potential health threats related to traffic noise and poor air quality. Excessive traffic noise could be an issue, especially for the smaller cap parks proposed in Santa Monica. These parks are similar in size to Seattle's Freeway Park which has some noise/acoustic issues relating to freeway traffic. A University of Southern California study has shown that children living near freeways are more likely to develop asthma and other respiratory problems.40 In addition, a recent study conducted in Sydney, Australia provides evidence that ultrafine particles produced by fuel combustion are lurking inside road tunnels in concentration levels so high they have the potential to harm drivers and passengers .41 However, exposure to air pollutants for a resident next to a freeway or for a driver inside the tunnel is not the same as for a park user above the freeway. Also, by covering segments of freeways, cap parks could possibly limit the amount of air pollutants adjacent residents would be exposed to. Published information, for the most part, indicates that the concentration of most air toxicants detected in communities exposed to tunnel emissions are below those concentrations that are generally considered to pose either a significant acute or chronic health hazard .42 Another environmental issue may be the short-term traffic and air quality impacts associated with the need to transport a significant amount of soil necessary to plant trees and landscaping at the park sites. The long-term air quality and noise impacts can be mitigated to some extent through the design of the parks. Some landscape architects argue that cap parks can mitigate the impacts without relying exclusively on mechanical systems. One idea, for example, is that the Hollywood Central Park could be designed to function as a "breathing apparatus" capable of filtering the carbon monoxide that would be vented out of the tunnel after the capping of the freeway.43 This proposed " Pool, B. (2008, November 19). Plan for park atop Hollywood Freeway is praised. L.A. Times, p. B3. 39 E-mail from Gayle Haberman of the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health received on 6/4/2010. 40 Gauderman, W. J. et al (2007). Effect of exposure to traffic on lung development from 10 to 18 years of age: a cohort study. The Lancet, 368, pp. 535-537. The study, which tracked 3,600 children for 13 years, found that those living within 500 yards of a highway faced risk of permanent health damage, including stunted lung growth and respiratory problems. 41 Queensland University of Technology (2009, August 30). Tunnels Concentrate Air Pollution By Up To 1,000 Times. ScienceDaily. Retrieved June 26, 2010, from http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/08 /090827101241.htm 42 Kuykendall, J.R. et al (2009). Chemicals present in automobile traffic tunnels and the possible community health hazards: A review of the literature. Inhalation Toxicology, 21(9), pp. 747-792. 43 Conversation with Gerdo Aquino of SWA Group on 7/2/2010. Professor Andrea Hricko of USC also expressed concerns about how and where air pollutants would be vented out from the tunnels during our phone conversation on 9/10/2010. 18 design would effectively suck up carbon monoxide from the tunnel and filter it through layers of vegetation on the surface. Some mechanical systems would be required, but the intent is to make visible the process of ventilation while incorporating an active, natural systems -based approach to filter the polluted air from the tunnel.aa From a big picture perspective, cap parks actually have the potential to improve the region's air quality and overall quality of life. In particular, the proposed cap parks are consistent with and help to implement Senate Bill 375 which seeks to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through land use planning. The vehicle for this coordination is a new regional land use plan called a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS). The result is expected to be more rational and coordinated regulation and public funding, which in turn should accelerate the pace at which development consistent with these plans can proceed. The Urban Land Institute (ULI)'s SB 375 Impact Analysis Report specifically points out that state funding priorities need to take into account: 1) SB 375 redirects future growth towards existing urban areas; and 2) in addition to transportation funds, other infrastructure investments such as monies for parks should also be linked to the SCS. Cap parks can also play an important role in the prevention and treatment of obesity. When people have access to parks, they are more likely to exercise, which can reduce obesity and its associated health risks and costs. As mentioned previously (on page 5), a number of studies have shown that enhanced access to places for physical activity produced an increase in the frequency of physical activity. Timing Because of their smaller size, Santa Monica's cap parks will most likely be developed before the proposals in Hollywood and downtown Los Angeles. As large-scale projects, Hollywood Central Park and PARK 101 will require lengthier environmental reviews and permitting processes. However, given the need for these parks, their potential benefits, and consistency with SB 375 goals, one might ask whether these reviews and processes could or should be streamlined or relaxed. 7. CONCLUSION As land has become increasingly scarce in Los Angeles, we need creative and resourceful planning solutions to meet the park and recreational needs of the population. Cap parks offer hope and benefits that simply cannot be ignored. In particular, larger cap parks have the potential to: improve regional air quality; help reduce obesity and its associated problems; create short- and long-term jobs; raise adjacent property values; and enhance the overall quality of life. While they can be costly and complex projects that are challenging to implement, cap parks represent a strategy that must be seriously considered to promote sustainability, address the need for more parkland, and reconnect neighborhoods that have been fragmented as a result of freeway construction. 44 E-mail from Gerdo Aquino of SWA Group on 8/31/2010. 19 REFERENCES AECOM. (2010, August). PARK 101 District Feasibility Study. Retrieved September 15, 2010, from http://www.compassblueprint.org/files/parkl01_report_web.pdf Arnold, C.A. (2007). Fair and healthy land use: environmental justice and planning. Chicago: American Planning Association. Casuso, J. (2009, March 26). Council Explores Big Plans for Civic Center. The LookOut news. Retrieved July 13, 2010, from http://www.surfsantamonica.com/ssm_site/ the lookout/ news/News-2009/March-2009 Crompton, J.L. (2001). Parks and economic development. Chicago: American Planning Association. Davies, V. (2008, August). A "Central Park" for Los Angeles? Urban Land, 67(8), 42-45. Day, K. (2006). Active Living and Social Justice: Planning for Physical Activity in Low-income, Black, and Latino Communities. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(1), 88-99. Di Rado, A. (2005, September 21). Childhood asthma linked to freeway pollution. USC News. Retrieved October 4, 2008, from http://www.usc.edu/uscnews/stories/11614.html DiMassa, C.M. (2009, March 28). Santa Monica considers `capping' freeway. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved March 28, 2009, from http://www.latimes.com/mews/local/la-me-freeway-cap28- 2009mar28,0,6738759.story EDAW/AECOM. (2008, October). Hollywood Freeway Central Park Feasibility Report. Retrieved November 23, 2008, from http://www.hollywoodchamber.net/business/HFCP_ Feasibility_ Report_20081008.pdf Garcia, R. & White, A. (2006). Healthy Parks, Schools, and Communities: Mapping Green Access and Equity for Los Angeles Region. Retrieved October 5, 2008, from http://www.cityprojectca.org/ourwork/mappinggreenaccess/documents/Healthy_Parks_Schools _Communities_textonly.pdf Gauderman, W. J., Vora, H., McConnell, R., Berhane, K., Gilliland, F., Thomas, D., Lurmann, F., Avol, E., Kunzli, N., Jerrett, M., & Peters, J. (2007, February). Effect of exposure to traffic on lung development from 10 to 18 years of age: a cohort study. The Lancet, 368, 535-537. Gies, E. (2006). The Health Benefits of Parks. San Francisco: Trust for Public Land. Harnik, P. (2010). Urban Green: Innovative Parks for Resurgent Cities. Washington: Island Press. Harnik, P. (2000). Inside City Parks. Washington, DC: Urban land Institute. Harnik, P. & Welle, B. (2007, April). Nature over traffic. Urban Land, 66(4), 102-105. Hise, G. & Deverell, W. (2000). Eden by Design: the 1930 Olmsted -Bartholomew Plan for the Los Angeles Region. Berkeley: University of California Press. 20 Hollywood Chamber of Commerce. (2007). Fact Sheet: Hollywood Freeway Central Park. Retrieved October 4, 2008, from http://www.hollywoodfreewaycentralpark.org/ docs/ HFCP_FactSheet.pdf Hyland, A. (2010, April 5). 101 Freeway Park Proposal Ramping Up. Los Angeles Business Journal. Retrieved July 13, 2010, from http://Iabusinessjournal.com/news/2010/apr/05/101- freeway-park-proposal-ramping Kuykendall, J.R., Shaw, S.L., Paustenbach, D., Fehling, K., Kacew, S., & Kabay, V. (2009). Chemicals present in automobile traffic tunnels and the possible community health hazards: A review of the literature. Inhalation Toxicology, 21(9), pp. 747-792. Linton, J. (2010, May 11). Park 101's Freeway Lid for a Walkable Downtown Los Angeles. Streetsblog Los Angeles. Retrieved July 1, 2010, from http://la.streetsbIog.org/ 2010/05/11 park - 101 s-freeway-lid-for-a-walkable-downtown-los-angeles Los Angeles County Department of Public Health. (2007, October). Preventing childhood obesity: the need to create healthy places. Retrieved October 11, 2008, from http://Iapublichealth.org/ wwwfiles/ph/hae/epi/chr2-ch ildhood_obesity. pdf Loukaitou-Sideris, A. & Stieglitz, O. (2002). Children in Los Angeles parks: a study of equity, quality and children's satisfaction with neighborhood parks. Town Planning Review, 73(4), 467- 488. Morris, M. (Ed.). (2006). Integrating planning and public health: tools and strategies to create healthy places. Chicago: American Planning Association. Pool, B. (2008, November 19). Plan for park atop Hollywood Freeway is praised. Los Angeles Times, p. B3. Queensland University of Technology (2009, August 30). Tunnels Concentrate Air Pollution By Up To 1,000 Times. ScienceDaily. Retrieved June 26, 2010, from http://www.sciencedaily.com/ releases/2009/08/090827101241.htm Richardson, E. (2010, May 11). Ambitious Park 101 Project Proposes Small First Step at Union Station. Blogdowntown.com. Retrieved July 2, 2010, from http://blogdowntown.com/ 2010/05/5332 -ambitious -park-101-project-proposes-small Richardson, E. (2010, July 1). Park 101 Costs and Next Steps Outlined by Study. Blogdowntown.com. Retrieved July 2, 2010, from http://blogdowntown.com/2010/07/5469-park- 101-costs-and-next-steps-outlined-by-study Sloane, D.C. (2006). From Congestion to Sprawl: Planning and Health in Historical Context. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(1), 10-18. Sloane, D.C., Nascimento, L., Flynn, G., Lewis, L., Jones Guinyard, J., Galloway -Gilliam, L., Diamant, A., & Yancey, A. (2006). Assessing Resource Environments to Target Prevention Interventions in Community Chronic Disease Control. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 17, 146-159. 21 Taborek, N. (2010, January 16). City Hall to take first step on freeway capping plan. Santa Monica Daily Press. Retrieved July 13, 2010, from http://www.smdp.com Townsend, G. (2010, February 24). Driving Green: LA flush with freeway park proposals. The Architect's Newspaper. Retrieved July 13, 2010, from http://www.archpaper.com/e- board_rev.asp? News-1 D=4275 Trust for Public Land. (2004, November). No place to play: a comparative analysis of park access in seven major cities. Retrieved October 4, 2008, from http://www.tpl.org/tier3_cd.cfm ?content item id=14565&folder id=266 Yanez, E. & Muzzy, W. (2005, October). Heathy Parks, Healthy Communities: Addressing Health Disparities and Park Inequities through Public Financing of Parks, Playgrounds, and Other Physical Activity Settings. San Francisco: Trust for Public Land. 22 ELEVATION 'A' D FLAN ENLARO EMENT @ GLU57ER HOMES 5GALE: I'' = IO' -O" ELE\\,IAT I ON - 'A' SCALE: I " 101-011 A FLONERI NO EVEROREEN OROUNC� C. -,OVER: - HDMEROGALL I S TRAGHELOSi ERR'-- M SENEG10 - ORNAMENTAL O RASSES. EVEROREEN SHRUF35: - ESGALLON I A - LIOU5TRUM RAFHIOLEFI5 - GALLI57EMON RHAMNUS. LOPHOSTEMON FERI ME7ER NA OPEN LA �. ohT I NO FLAN ENLAROEMENT @ FOG<E7 FAR< SCALE: I'' = 10'-O" en n ice+ irr r -- - 5ENGH SEAT I NO ti r 'T I /'1 k I I rn I t GC,R . t: I " = 10'-0 " SGALF.: I'' - 200'-0" )CGKET PA E ENL? 15 SHEE CLUSTER HOMES P / / SEE ENLARO EMF -NT, THIS SHFF-T LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENTS - #5 - CLUS'T'ER HOME PRODUCT & POCKET PARK PREPARED FOR.- LENNAR 0 25 ENTERPRISE ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656 (949) 349-8100 PREPARED BY. - DESIGN GROUP 31591 Camino Capistrano San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 www.RJMdesigngroup.com [949] 493-2690 fax [949] 493-2600 WILL 0 W HEIGHTS TEN TA T1 VE TRACT 5EGT I ON A -A -- TYP I GAL a 15' STREET SCALE: I" = 101_O'1 A OONIS PLEXUOSA — PEPPERMINT WILLOH FLOWTERIN6, EVERGREEN SF RUBS 8 6ROUNDGOVER, T'YP. TUBULAR STEEL 5LIDING ENTRY GATES, TYP. { T dp UL t R a h SECTION 5-5 -- ENTRY DRIVE 4 GATES SCALE: 1 1, = I04-014 LOPHOSTEMON CONFERTUS — BRI55ANE BOX FLOHERING, EVERGREEN BHRUB5 8 5ROUNDGOVER, NP. SPECIMEN CANOPY TREES HT X WDTH (FT) MASTER PLANT LEGEND SHRUBS QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA COAST LIVE OAK 40 X 50 LIGUSTRUM J. 'TEXANUM' TEXAS PRIVET PLATANUS RACEMOSA CALIFORNIA SYCAMORE 40 X 30 RHAMNUS C. 'LITTLE SUR' COFFEEBERRY RAPHIOLEPIS INDICA RHAPHIOLEPIS PRUNUS CAROLINIANA'BR[GHT'N TIGHT' CAROLINA CHERRY EVERGREEN CANOPY TREE AT ENTRY DRIVE 8s 'A' STREET BUXUS JAPONICA JAPANESE BOXWOOD XYLOSMA CONGESTUM SHINEY XYLOSMA LOPHOSTEMON CONFERTUS BRISBANE BOX 30 X 20 ESCALLONIA SP_ ESCALLONIA ELEAGNUS PUNGENS SILVERBERRY CALLISTEMON 'LITTLE JOHN' DWARF CALLISTEMON CANOPY TREE AT 'B' STREET MYRTUS COMMUNIS MYRTLE WESTRINGIA FRUTICOSA COAST ROSEMARY LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA CRAPE MYRTLE 20 X 20 BOUGAINVILLEA SP. 'OO -LA -LA' PROSTRATE BOUGAINVILLEA (PLANTING SHALL PROVIDE FOR A MIN. OF 70% 5 GAL.; 30% 1 GAL.) COURTYARD / PATIO TREES GROUNDCOVERS MYOPORUM P 'PUTAH CREEK' MYOPORUM VINES / ESPALLIERS DISTICTUS SP. TRUMPET VINE JASMINUM MESNYI PRIMROSE JASMINE 88j GELSEMIUM SEMPERVIRENS CAROLINA JESSAMINE MANDEVILLA HYBRIDS MANDEVILLA i.. TRACHELOSPERMUM JASMINOIDES STAR JASMINE CALLIANDRA CALIFORNICA BAJA FAIRY DUSTER 93(PLANTING SHALL PROVIDE FOR A MIN. OF 80% 5 GAL.; 20% 15 GAL.) r 82 87 TRACT No. 2.5991 � 4 M.B. 7PGS 16 TO 21 82 86 92 j 8 AWL) 10 FLEXUOSA PEPPERMINT WILLOW 25 X 20 METROSIDEROS EXCELSIS NEVA ZEALAND CHRISTMAS TREE 20 X 15 TRACHELOSPERMUM JASMINOIDES STAR JASMINE 14� 83 85 PRUNUS CAROLINIANA'BRIGHT N TIGHT' CAROLINA LAUREL 18 X 15 MUEHLENBERGIA RIGENS DEERGRASS 1 LAGERSTROMIA INDICA CRAPE MYRTLE 20 X 20 BAGCHAR[S P. PIGEON POINT' DWARF COYOTE BUSH LOPHOSTEMON CONFERTUS BRISBANE BOX 30 X 20 HEMEROCALLIS HYBRIDS DAYLILLY RHUS LANGEA AFRICAN SUMAC 20 X 20 CEANOTHUS SP. CEANOTHUS CUPRESSUS SEMPERVIRENS WONSHEL' DWARF ITALIAN CYPRESS 15 X 5 ACACIA REDOLENS ACACIA15 OLEA EUROPA'LITTLE OLLIE' FRUITLESS OLIVE 5 X 3 SENECIO SERPENS SENECIO 1r 1 2 -�` fir, 84 RHAPIOLEPIS INDICA INDIA HAWTHORN 6 X 3 PACHYSANDRA TERMINALIS JAPANESE SPURGE ARBUTUS X'MARINA' STRAWBERRY TREE 20 X 181 r" NTING SHALL PROVIDE FOR 100°/o COVERAGE WITHIN 2 YEARS � -f f 1` r� 1 ��- �'� � � • _ (PLA ) 1 ! MAIN ENTRY 4 OATES -- - 16 1 5 3 .. 1, (SEE ELEVAT 1 ON) SLOPE f OPEN SPACE 'TREES TRACT No. 3341 -7 ----TRACT No. X5991'- , µ y y - V ` y PLATANUS RACEMOSA CALIFORNIA SYCAMORE 40 X 30 --- _,� QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA COAST LIVE OAK 40 X 50 M.B. 702. PGS 1 TCS 1 M.B. 909 PGS 37 T[� 39 '' 4 LOPHOSTEMON CONFERTUS BRISBANE BOX 30 X 20 + 7 17 AGONIS FLEXUOSA PEPPERMINT WILLOW 25 X 20 STREETSC APE 1:>E5I ON MELALEUCA QUINQUENERVIA PAPERBARK TREE 25 X 28 r (SHALL CONFORM TO G I TY'S STREETSGAPE " (OVERALL TREE PLANTING SHALL PROVIDE FOR A MIN. OF 20°/° 24" BOX; 80°I° 15 GAL.) � DES I C N STANC ARDS AND BE I RR I C ATED SEPARATELY FROM DEVELOPMENT) I NTERLOCK I NC CONCRETE PAVERS, TYP. (TUMBLED, THREE—COLOR BLEND) I- OOKET FARE (SEE ENLARC EMENT) G I TY' C ATEA AY ENTRY Me0NIJMENTATI ON LOPHOSTEMON CONFERTUS — BRUSBANE BOX (PER FUTURE G I TY STREETSGAFE DES I C N STANDARDS) ,PARK DEVELOPMENT (UNDER SEPARATE GONTRAGT) a_ - ---------------------------------- 4P --------------------, Ir Gy ` + •1� \�, � r fly �~ �� j �'? .�J— J SECTION G -G -- TYPICAL ® 'A' STREET SCALE: I" = I01_01' O38 t 25 ,31 ,� 1CLUSTER PRODUCT J(SEE ENLARC EMENT) 34 - --- TRACT No. X5989 1 1 3538 , . B. 714, PGS 5 TCS 7 ,� ,� � � � 14 37 PARK DEVELOPMENT15 �� (UNDER 5F—FARATE GONTRAGT) U 16 \ 1 LANDSCAPE CONCEPT STATEMENT , � 17 THE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER IN THE EXISTING SITE IS CHARACTERIZED BY ITS EXISTING OAKS, SYCAMORE, EUCALYPTUS, WILLOWS. THESE REGIONAL MATERIALS CONTRIBUTE TO THE UNDERSTATED RANCH -STYLE CHARACTER OF THE COMMUNITY. THE LANDSCAPE CONCEPT FOR THE WILLOW HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WILL PROVIDE FOR A LANDSCAPE PALETTE CONSISTENT WITH THIS EXISTING SITE CHARACTER AND SENSE OF PLACE. SECTION D -D -- TYP I GAL PEDESTRIAN GR0551 N0 a 'B' STREET SCALE: 1" = 10'-011 THE PROPOSED PLANT PALETTE UTILIZES OAKS AND SYCAMORES AS FOCAL AND OPEN SPACE � PLANTINGS. LOCATED AT THE PROJECT ENTRY AS WELL AS WITHIN SLOPE PLANTINGS, THESE TREES WILL PROVIDE FOR LARGE SCALE CANOPY TREES CONSISTENT WITH THE SITE'S CHARACTER. BRISBANE BOX, PEPPERMINT WILLOW AND CRAPE MYRTLE WILL BE UTILIZED ALONG STREETSCAPES AND PEDESTRIAN PASEOS TO RETAIN THE OVERALL RURAL CHARACTER OF THE DEVELOPMENT. UNDERSTORY PLANTINGS OF EVERGREEN FLOWERING SHRUBS AND GROUND COVERS WILL COMPLEMENT THE PALETTE OF CANOPY TREES AND HELP TO DEFINE EACH PROJECT AREA'S UNIQUE SENSE OF PLACE. HARDSCAPE MATERIALS WILL BE SELECTED THAT ARE RANCH -LIKE IN THEIR APPEAL AND CHARACTER. VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN PAVING WILL BE ENHANCED WITH ACCENTS OF TUMBLED, INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE PAVERS. SITE WALLS AND FENCING WILL BE DETAILED WITH MATERIALS THAT PRESENT A'WARM' COLOR RANGE AND RELATE TO THE EARTH TONES OF THE SURROUNDING LANDSCAPE. THE COLLECTIVE PALETTE OF PLANTINGS AND HARDSCAPE MATERIALS WILL REMAIN CONSISTENT WITH AND COMPLEMENT THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR'S INHERENT CHARACTER AND AUTHENTICITY. lopV i J F.. / ,r 6 TRACT No. 3 M.B. 900,\PGS 29 TO 25 jFEDE5TR I AN GR0551 NC THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT REQUIRES THE REMOVAL OF ALL 75 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BLACK WALNUT, SIX WILLOW, AND TWO COAST LIVE OAK TREES. A MINIMUM OF 250 NEW TREES WILL BE PROVIDED IN RESPONSE TO THE CITY'S EXISTING TREE MITIGATION PROGRAM. THESE PROPOSED REPLACEMENT TREES ARE AS NOTED BELOW: EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED: 75 - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BLACK WALNUT 6 - WILLOW 2 - COAST LIVE OAK 83 TOTAL EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED MITIGATION REPLACEMENT RATIO; 3.1 83X3 = 249 REPLACEMENT TREES REQUIRED PROPOSED REPLACEMENT TREES: 75 - COAST LIVE OAK 174 - SYCAMORE SP. ** 249 TOTAL PROPOSED REPLACEMENT TREES ** `* THESE TREES WILL BE PROVIDED AT BOTH THE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND THE PROPOSED PARK SITES (50150 SPLIT) ** 1s 14 NE16 50RI IVCD CANOPY I E @1 'E3' STREET (SEE LEC END) 13 "VERDURA" PLANTED RETA I N I NC WALL, TYP. 12 \ TRACT 321974 M.B. 873, PGS 59 TG 56�--- - --- ------- -------- `— ----- -- -------- ------- ------- -------- ------- 10 SLOPE I OPEN SPACE TREES (SEE LEC END $ —ENLARGEMENTS) 7 f 6 5 �. i NEiO+Bow-coon cAxor-Y re c� 'A' STREET (SEE LEC END) '`•;� 'VERDUf�A' PLANTED RET. V�IhALL (SEE ENLARGEMENT) -..,_ OPEN SPACE / SLOPE PLNTC7. (5E:E: ENLAR6EMEN7) 5 I I I 1 I I \ 1� FEET 0 30 60 120 0 112 1 2 INCHES PREPARED FOR. OWNER: LENNAIR a 25 ENTERPRISE ALISt7 VILJO, CA 92656 (949) 349-8100 PREPARED BY- R M DESIGN GROUP 31591 Camino Capistrano San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 www.RJMdesigngroup.com [9491493-2690d- a [9491493-2600 pha ,c I WILLOW HE/CRTs PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN 12 of 71 VEST/NG TENTATIVE TRACT 72795 7.31.13 WALL AND LANDSCAPE RJM DATE REVISION �Y PREPARED BY- R M DESIGN GROUP 31591 Camino Capistrano San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 www.RJMdesigngroup.com [9491493-2690d- a [9491493-2600 pha ,c I WILLOW HE/CRTs PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN 12 of 71 VEST/NG TENTATIVE TRACT 72795 PROJECT PROF/LES (VERTICAL & HORIZONTAL SCALE: V" 60') VIEW PROFILE #1 VIEW PROFILE #4 LEGEND - NATURAL GROUND DESIGN GROUND 2 PROPOSED GRADING Boo- 760- 720- 680- 640 oo760720680640 s0o BDo- -760 760- 720 USED NING WALL PROJECT BOUNDARY LINE -Boo LOT LINE - - EASEMENT LINE CENTERLINE OPOSE E WALLA" �W PROPOSED WATER s PROPOSED SEWER 720 LP PROPOSED ST. BY > WIN XISTIN k=pl ml ,� lo°e \ -------------------------------- OPOSE " 8" ST. P !OPOSED -------------- 6.0' PRO SED ADE 00 Lots -' PROPO ED GRADE EME PROPOSED Lot 10 SE WA L BLVD. --- A" ST. Pad 7082' ( - EXI TING G DE ---- vmt m - LI 1 1 Lot 1 EXIS ING GRADE _ o Lot 39 - - PR POSED MSE WALL \ Pad=771 PROP A" SED T ad=774.. Lot 2 'P - ----------- ------- rypi -_- S. DIAMOND BAR -'- OPOSE Pa =727"5 PROPOSED "A" BLVD. Lot 4 PacII25' Pa Lot 14 "B"ST. p pi _ Lot S . �> R P PR SED PR P SED AINING WALL ��\-p OPOSE RETAIN NG W PR L POSED GRADE mi0i kp f PRO OSED ACCESS AC ESS ACC S Lot O ROPOSD MSE ALL --- ---_ ---- ---- ---- - -- _ ---- ---- ---- ---- ------------- ---- > STING a ARK XIS ---- --------- d=7083 Pad- 08.6' pad=7 7.8* Pad= 07.4' BREA BREA RAIN RDEN P (STING GROUN g N. RD. HA PARK ASIN Lot 1 L t 1 Lot L 1 p s0o BDo- -760 760- 720 - 840 USED NING WALL PROJECT BOUNDARY LINE -Boo LOT LINE - - EASEMENT LINE CENTERLINE OPOSE E WALLA" �W PROPOSED WATER s PROPOSED SEWER 720 LP PROPOSED ST. BY > WIN XISTIN k=pl ml ,� lo°e \ -------------------------------- OPOSE " 8" ST. P !OPOSED -------------- 6.0' PRO SED ADE 00 Lots -' el EME PRIC Lot 10 - 840 USED NING WALL PROJECT BOUNDARY LINE -Boo LOT LINE - - EASEMENT LINE CENTERLINE OPOSE E WALLA" �W PROPOSED WATER s PROPOSED SEWER 720 LP 720 T 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 SD PROPOSED STORM DRAIN 5RWL RETAINING WALL/ 680 RETAINING WALL HEIGHT TOP OF SLOPE V -DITCH 640 Trr?ACT ATO. 2il5DDi MSE WALL 40 80 120 760 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680 720 760 800 840 880 920 960 7000 7040 7080 1120 7760 7200 7240 1280 7320 1360 7400 7440 7480 7520 7560 1600 \ / ':\ \ A VIEW PROFILE #2 ° — — — / PROPOSED 8' _ � Y ° / SIDEWALK d % VICINITY MAP - - - - NATURAL GROUND PROPOSED GRADING \\ \ EX. POWER POLE 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK -_ 800 \ \ tT TO BE RELOCATED �// 160- 720 680 ENHANCED PAVEMENT NOTES 760\ / \�\ AREA TO BE DEDICATED TO 1. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 8714-002-900, 8714-002-901, 8714-002-902, /A �\ O EX R/w THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 8714-002-903 AND 8714-015-901. A EX. CURB � � g g, Aa V o1T0 o A \/ ,A PROPOSED CURB 720 \ \ / \ `\\ / o PROPOSED R/W r� �� ^� �zR/N' \ ^ i i \� Cut 2 EXISTING &PROPOSED ZONING: SITE D SPECIFIC PLAN \\�EXIS77NG 8" SEI}ER/ \ \ \\\ .��� / \ y/ $ - / l Fill C ILL LINE 3. EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT I / I UT F r \ / EX SIGNAGE 70 BE _ 41 \ /+Tvq / l \ \ \ \ �/ / TO BE RELOCiATE�D 13y p W6 \�\ ! l e I 4. PROPOSED LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL 680 \ �.i / e �t9 r yJ l �\... F. H. FIRE HYDRANT \ y g /^N Z \ 5. EXISTING & PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN: SPECIFIC PLAN, SITE D. 0 40 80 120 180 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680 720 760 800 840 880 920 960 1000 1040 1080 1120 CONNECT 70 r EX. 10" ACP WATER - j8 -j \'$ G, ' 13p 135 24 \\\ TFlrl rT /id ;�z�SEWER DRAIN LOW PLOW 7i 1 6. ALL STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND GRADING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE �, / VIEW PROFILE #3 \ / m \� EXIS NG $" -SEWER /`,BPR r ` psl \\ 1\\ x A s WITH DIAMOND BAR STANDARDS, ORDINANCES AND APPROVED MODIFICATIONS HERETO. / A w p 5 RT a \ d Iva, 87'3, PIGS 5J TO -5 DIVERSION STRUCTURE - NATURAL GROUND PROPOSED GRADING r �1 PROPOSED MEDIAN \� O. / ^ 11'1- 5 \" (\ 1740 ---- \ \\ 7. ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD SHALL BE ACCOMMODATED ON THE FINAL DESIGN OR 760 720 680 oa oCe p PROPOSED P OPOSE E WALLA" 7.2213 FIRE AND PLANNING LP PROPOSED ST. BY > 0O XISTIN k=pl ml ,� lo°e \ -------------------------------- OPOSE " 8" ST. P !OPOSED -------------- 6.0' PRO SED ADE ---- Lots -' el PRIC Lot 10 BLVD. --- A" ST. Pad 7082' = EXI TING G DE ---- vmt m - LI 1 1 Lot 1 ENHANCED PAVEMENT NOTES 760\ / \�\ AREA TO BE DEDICATED TO 1. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 8714-002-900, 8714-002-901, 8714-002-902, /A �\ O EX R/w THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 8714-002-903 AND 8714-015-901. A EX. CURB � � g g, Aa V o1T0 o A \/ ,A PROPOSED CURB 720 \ \ / \ `\\ / o PROPOSED R/W r� �� ^� �zR/N' \ ^ i i \� Cut 2 EXISTING &PROPOSED ZONING: SITE D SPECIFIC PLAN \\�EXIS77NG 8" SEI}ER/ \ \ \\\ .��� / \ y/ $ - / l Fill C ILL LINE 3. EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT I / I UT F r \ / EX SIGNAGE 70 BE _ 41 \ /+Tvq / l \ \ \ \ �/ / TO BE RELOCiATE�D 13y p W6 \�\ ! l e I 4. PROPOSED LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL 680 \ �.i / e �t9 r yJ l �\... F. H. FIRE HYDRANT \ y g /^N Z \ 5. EXISTING & PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN: SPECIFIC PLAN, SITE D. 0 40 80 120 180 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680 720 760 800 840 880 920 960 1000 1040 1080 1120 CONNECT 70 r EX. 10" ACP WATER - j8 -j \'$ G, ' 13p 135 24 \\\ TFlrl rT /id ;�z�SEWER DRAIN LOW PLOW 7i 1 6. ALL STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND GRADING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE �, / VIEW PROFILE #3 \ / m \� EXIS NG $" -SEWER /`,BPR r ` psl \\ 1\\ x A s WITH DIAMOND BAR STANDARDS, ORDINANCES AND APPROVED MODIFICATIONS HERETO. / A w p 5 RT a \ d Iva, 87'3, PIGS 5J TO -5 DIVERSION STRUCTURE - NATURAL GROUND PROPOSED GRADING r �1 PROPOSED MEDIAN \� O. / ^ 11'1- 5 \" (\ 1740 ---- \ \\ 7. ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD SHALL BE ACCOMMODATED ON THE FINAL DESIGN OR 760 720 680 840 < / o / ^ --"""' 3 / Poli \\ ,139.5 \ \\ Nva MP -40 MEDIA FILTER THEY SHALL BE EITHER QUITCLAIMED, ABANDONED OR RELOCATED TO THE 1 n \\ vc\ p \ \ % SATISFACTION OF ALL INTERESTED PARTIES. DRAINAGE AND PUBLIC UTILITY EX SIGNAGE TO BE - /x'!= - 'd �.� \ \ �y r rm\ TO BE RELOCATED /p , _y 305 73 0 \�\ \u\\\ �� TREATMENT BMP EASEMENTS NECESSARY TO SERVE THIS PROJECT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE Boo 71RAL7 J'k I0t'JY� \ _ ^^ y -� - sl t m\ I CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AND WITH THE UTILITY PURVEYORS. EXISTING STORM DRAIN ` j \ o r --& Id PtiS -� p \N\\ ps1}99 i \S NATURAL AREA TO - (� EASEMENTS WILL BE ABANDONED DURING THE FINAL MAP PROCEDURES. BE PRESERVED PROPOSED SIGNAL / " /.91111 A 'o\ psl 1 �i o� �� o -_ / / I )�I S. MULTI FAMILY BUILDING TO MEET NFPA 13 STANDARDS. •' \ y }0� \ `nom �i I CONNECT TO EXISTING ••VA/ o \ _ zB0 \ t0" ACP WATER � v � _ I EX/ST/NG EASEMENTS 9. ESTIMATED EARTHWORK QUANTITIES: 415,500 LYS. CUT, 415,500 LYS. FILL. ps136 12 5 � 1 N 3,¢ pR 1NUFY 10. SEWER SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION \ M U R O2 EASEMENT 70 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES DISTRICT. 6 \5 p 871g. _ REC FEBRUARY 8, 1954 /N BOOK 43774, PAGE 241, UR 720 � - \ ' W - s \ r?2 " �f / / \ � , P' R` � � d� M � ;95 I \\ WPtV 11. PER LA COUNTY FIRM PANEL 1880 OF 2350. / 30' LANDS PES a 5Ir pslil5 -I 2 \ 1199 �fi>,r''j/ 2' pol \ m \o p5E ZER O3 EASEMENT TO GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, A CORPORATION ,9- \V ps13g5 \ -- '� FOR POLE LINES REC APRIL 28, 1954 /N BOOK 44446, PAGE 33 0R 12. PRIVATE WATER QUALITY BMP'S TO BE MAINTAINED BY H.O.A. / \2 a \ CV 6Bo � ,0•V1 � � C G � `vl I sltg9 2. "�. p a � app \\\\ \\... O6 EASEMENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR STORM GRAIN PURPOSES AS SHOWN ON TRACT No. 27577 REC IN 13. LOTS 62 & 63 ARE TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR &MAINTAINED 4 16 .0. " \ P s1'L1S9 // sl BY THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 A80 520 560 600 640 680 720 760 800 840 880 920 / - t 6 :�, \ \ p / E P \ \ \ BK 702, PGS. 22 70 25 INCLUSIVE OF MAPS RECORDS LOS ANGELES COUNTY. /To SIGNAGE TO BE 5 \ i t l TO BE RELOCATED �-I- � � % � 0 ®e S _� \ \ 0 6 MSE I \qea i \� �-1�' _ - - O EASEMENT 70 THE PUBLIC FOR WATER PIPELINES REC. AUGUST 31, 7960 AS INSL No. 3278, IN BK; 14. ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG DIAMOND BAR BLVD,. BREA CANYON RD AND -1 RIGHT-OF-WAY TO / o 0 0 _ o \� ^� ps11%' ps1 \ \ Ps -- _L _ _ _ _ PASADO DR. TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. / / I TR ICT 1117 _15DT.�l o'•� BE DEDICATED TO THE -F - � R°' " �'Psj1 \\\\ PsJA s1�5 \ \\ NO PAGE 305, OR. SURVEYORS N07E.' EASEMENT FOLLOWS THE CENTERLINE OF DIAMOND BAR BTW, / I CITY OF DIAMOND BAR a 2d \ 5c 1� l 6 0 - p l NO W/DTH IS GIVEN IN THE DOCUMENT 15. ALL TRASH 15 INDIVIDUAL PICK UP BY WASTE MANAGEMENT. TRASH PICK UP FOR i / $ / g -'� �5 �'a I sT6'\� g�+ .5 \ \ \ \ I, 17 EASEMENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR STREET PURPOSES AS SHOWN ON TRACT No. 25989 REC. IN BK 714, LOTS 2 THROUGH 5 NEEDS TO BE LOCATED ON "B'• STREET. TRASH PICK UP FOR EX.- 12' ACP WATER " 1`' -• P o, Q.' 10 \ s ?,i756.5 s13 \ ) 405 1 ro 1� gRUw P LOT 1 WILL BE ALONG THE LOOP ALLEY. m. ,p eb \ J 4a� . j ( P 2 • 01 p PGS 5 70 7 OF MAPS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY / /TO�BE RELOCATED _ EASEMENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR STORM DRAINS AND SANITARY SEWER AS SHOWN ON TRACT NO. 27577 16, LOTS 1-5 TO BE MAPPED FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES. r PROPOSED MEDIA m. / 'CUi Iyy. '� \ �.. ,-1gp \. o \� \ ps136 P' s \\\\ 111 .. \ \ BETPRESER ED URAL AREA TO EX POWER POLE/ oVfl / ps113 g -, P \ \ 2' ps1115 \ �, 7 ? WqD\ \ . ^ \\- V I I I REC IN BK 702, PGS 22 TO 25 INCLUSIVE OF MAPS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY. STORM DRAIN SYSTEM TO BE PRIVATE. 70 BE RELOCA� �'- -5 g0 n 141 V A Ps _V - ® EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN COUNT/ES GAS COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA FOR GAS PIPE LINES, LIGHT, POWER 6" 7.6" PROPOSED SIGNAL - a$ 1 ' ' Psl S / 186 V A A g0 _ ---- 18. EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED PER TREE SURVEY. C.F. PER PIAN 6" 12" 12" MODIFICATION CL - ,� FII( .1 - s1 \ 5 V l // A - PURPOSES REC FEBRUARY 17, 1964 REC AS INSL 3774, OR. W DIAMOND BAR BLVD 10" __ _ PROPOSED ft/Wi ,N --- � � � VA X1,3 � p A o � I p AVo A p�l� 1 & BREA CANYON RD. F o_- p 18 \ _ _ - �g 0 vv CUi a c ,2 AG V V v 5 x116 v i 61 V EASEMENT TO THE DIAMOND BAR WATER COMPANY FOR WATER PIPES REC AUGUST 31, 9960 REG. IN BK. 1-1/2 i,:, t PROPOSED EWA K i '' '� �' p i1 9` 185 V A 72 P I 3• A '� �' 168.5 s" V 0-962, PAGE 305, OR. AND REC. DATE: AUGUST 10, 1964 AS INST. No. 3417, OR R_ 1/2" R=3' .,,�; � � _ _ $ $ $ .. ` �� / i 0 AAVA 0� � ,1133 _ o !v Psl AV A � � 0 P ? SURVEYOR'S NOTE, EASEMENT FOLLOWS THECENTERLINE OF DIAMOND BAR BLVD., NO WIDTH IS GIVEN .. 12„W� 3 5 ti -_ _ EX R/W '- .. T ,1A�'. P hd� yF V . V A Ps 180 Ol 6 Pi188. 33 oa A IN THE DOCUMENT UTILITY 2 o c. s. TY AGENCIES .. � R=1/z• e :".,<;. FL R=1/2” - _ _ o _ -- 2,• -Ex cuee.�� �... ,..:':.: •t4 �111�1 2' vv ,� HIv ° v 5 v v v t.Z _ A W� TRASH: (SINGLE FAMILY HOMES) e v vv 1,1 1,8. vvl- - 8l? v ' • ' •->• _ EX. POKER POI - _ o� _ -- �- "r"' p s. 5 ` O 1 4' w Pz 9 \ aM . ' 6- . = 6a Pi1 NATURAL AREA 6 EASEMENT TO THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FOR SANITARY SEWER PURPOSES REC. NOVEMBER 11, 1971 WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WASTE MANAGEMENT INC. ' -• - - -.; ..: : ° iO BE RELOCATED 12 W-� tz W p_ _-- N _. /' v v , ? vy P ,s' �5! ov v��` 5 p=119 a- 35 6� U, ; BE PRESERVED 'i AS INST 3366, O.R. 271 S. BREA CANYON ROAD 13940 E. LIVE OAK AVE. A\ \ 1 q \ RE ps1 sp I V g' Y 1• l0 i '' - WALNUT, CA 91789 BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 •- . .:.:;:- .'.: / X23 - _- _ ___ j r ps. " 12 � ��-psl8 • - •- .. . - � � e- psl � � s8° S � 9 - V p �, � � / � 7 EASEMENT TO THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FOR STORM DRAIN, INGRESS AND EGRESS REC. DATE (909) 595-7554 (800) 266-7551 o \ ,9 .. , 36 MAY 982 AS INST. 82-508759, O.R. 5 _2 v v sL poP ' ,. v . v v �- p L, 2d' ,•• Z slp6' v v 11 32 " A A 6 TELEPHONE SERVICE: TRASH: FOR MULTI -FAMILY O RIGHT-OF-WAY TO ti 1 680 MP -40 �' TDRM IN P V 4'se \ l 1 4' R 9a i' 60 t,,p1 R3T H 18 1 BE DEDICATED TO THE EDTA FILTER 8 LOW FLOW X p� 6 6 s1 31 's V 1,51 , 1 A M V , v - 6 3 6 'o' �/ VERIZON VALLEY VISTA INC. ^ O Dll/ERSION 'o sl 1 - ,....r 6 b8 1a% •N 1 1 s" 1 5 8 P, 8 0 \ ` / / ✓{` 3' BROW�� /q G mrD 6, ry RB & GUM �ITY OF DI MOND BAR `a - EATMENT P To P p8 P - vv w P` 6 -1 �FII( CUi / UITCH, irP 1400 PHILLIPS RANCH RD. BALDW E. LIVE OAK AVE. 4 ROLLED CURB k GUTTER {.VI4U W� 4LI� d / - / � _ � -T G7uRE -' � � � <^ _ r \ � �q � � � 9 bd r i i � I �` POMONA, CA 91766 BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 7 / v -- _ a A p0.2 25 S ps1116 ��, vv ps1151 7 5 as4-y&r �� 1 : o �s� /c v sj855 �- 3 0 s /� / & _ ) ( (800) 483-5000 (800) 266-7551 NIS NTS `Fill / //' v v ° � P � /� z • _ >� 1 � " I (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) / '/ /Psl I/�s 1 �2 \ s1%61 3 r'/ r'3�., 0 o.uMp y \ \���� ps1134 v p j 60 r �5 r '`\ '( ELECTRIC SERVICE: CABLE N � T.1 I � ; I I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. TIME WARNER 013 51 �;,/ / P� ,1615 �.II _ 59 S�N DIMASG CA V91773 GLENDORA,OCAE96740 Ps114 \ s1 I e 1 N 1..i, NATURAL AREA To -.- �I (800) 655-4555 3' EX- US 9 e° / /// / \\ `'% o� �' 6�\ po71 69a i \ po1�'S i a s-�/ e2 P'1610 P'O I_ i o-7 BE PRESERVED l �I jT �1-+- �I POSTAL SERVICE: _ s, o \ r DI7C�E7YP - - _. 4 " „ \, 1'J �€ , .. ,r ! O GAS SERVICE: USPS GARAGE / /EX k/w 7i ��02/ / / A' o s" p ` 7 s1 ,' ps11 1 _ - 1 ,r / '> N1 0 A,5 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. DIAMOND SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BLVD. / 0 � o: DOOR EX POWER POLE r CU ym�•� 0`u s- / / a r. p ) o/ 5 t -'� ` �1 1919 S, STATE COLLEGE BLVD. DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 T AND U 6•• ANAHEIM, CA 92806 (800) 27 TILITIES PR POSED RB RF ^� / 4 a - l l ^/ �� �. m r 3 5-8777 CUN /W ^o �_ /� 2i 2� %MM 70 BE RELOCATED PROPOSED R ps1111 q 3 PEDESTRIAN / p 'r9� �i� ps185•rJ Bo �I \v �Dl'r > �, w- 1,2A 27-2200 SEWER SERVICE: (TR UNK LINES( (800) 4 ,i,• / T� / Opp // / 0f A / o 'z '•'. ps > /8 b�� / �' / o �s `< v s� ss: G `L^ .r -- SCHOOL DISTRICT: LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT WALNUT VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT 1955 WORKMAN MILL ROAD W4i a § / / / ! /•�o^ ,'17 880 SOUTH LEMON AVE. WHITTI(562)E6 CA 90607 06 SR\� P 1 i/ > / `. ,l 90 / �. 61 A \: �.. pot CI r i> _ \/ WALNUT. CA 91789 (562) 699-7411 / /o / h //��° 6/ / I // / /y. l / `> - 0 m. 16 / / Ams // > P, h3 ^ 6 a la polo- , \� 16o HE 93 _ /' SEWER SERVICE. (MAIN LINES) 0 3 I lob U CURB DETAIL / " / �`O�� h / // - 'r / / / 1` r ,153 , , r >. / a^ A'C r I LOS ANGELES COUNTY OF PUBLIC WORKS e / m. p' 2 �4 0 v r ri ) SEWER MAINTENANCE DISTRICT r Y r r 9� . s GUi NTS � < / / h O / � / Ic Zt / / / 'L 6 . \ � , r I (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) / / p 675 / O / / - "a / / >O LOT a' � `' \ O ^ - tS `P ' ° sz & 181 5 r r / 900 LHAM BR , NTCA g L0V 6.3 / 0 00 / / ��A. , r a �..., > P> \o r >' r .Q o , / -<<°. r .y _.. p r , ALHAMBRA. CA a �9 IPA / `O� o / 1 v r� / /y. $ r' ��C �/5� 6t �'Py' r 4. r / s>, q �� r L Jr'i sT 3' BROW / / J \ 4, / h / / 90i' 3K'- r r r s1� 2 I, r .\o Q J• y r er DITCH, TYP C / cslrII�.P�� a s> RTft ,o A o BENCH MARK s rlc� r 76 ' tia / q0 s 4 . FI 1 /._ // _ \ / / / �" '\� >> , r , Q NATURAL AREA TOi p XISTING / e� / e s> r 0- - 40 ('` - S h\ v , BE PRESERVED' LOS ANGELES COUNTY BENCHMARK NO. G 5073 ELEVATION: 726.809 DATUM: NAVD 88, B / U ERGROUNO / °' / / /'by ^° h 3 1• r/ Po 5 r 111.5 / ,ri 0� \ I \ 2005 ADJUSTMENT ti Fill @ e, b 26' r' / 0 / Pr. / R CE FLOWS �ry� 7a / ooP 61 I I/ M• / / / �0 r /b . BUY ^3P o _ mom, / "` RS f '\° i x18,.5 - -1 9 / i/ /_ 7 R r> Q o°j h n ,� h o / / �ti a>, r< P/ y DESCRIPTION: LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TAG IN EAST CURB OF DIAMOND BAR BLVD. 42.7 .FEET EAST OF CENTERLINE AND 95 FEET NORTH OF CENTERLINE OF �p�k4� /�' / �Q�OPGT CROOKED CREEK DRIVE. " �Q• I �- -- / / l>o C 1 r.. r 6 moo\ pot sP �b / /Y \� mss• - \ 11,2 'r PSI _ LEGAL DESCRIPTION I F / ^e As'x> 0�5 .a� 9j/g \✓ s>'r7 �, / po11 L \ �P c /� FlRE TRUCK ��� \ 6 — 5.oR = 1 :: N a 61 �.a 11 P/1 15 s e5 o106.Oss" J, s , s \ �. ' S� 0/ / e/ � BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 9 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO TURNING RADIUS DETAIL �� ^ — i a ' �5 s P A� 0 6 • ti / MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, GOUTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. J. 9, m �O � / ° EC /, c rr h .\9 ij 3' TOE .._ v - �✓�� � a1 � / �. V 690 7! OS ' � r' � '��+ '.a 0 60 0. 69 b.. � IB' r y0• �rii DITCFY TYP / 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK (/ 1 / / ,/ ry9 v 6, ?,1-- 16 v "rz^y - 9 r' / _ _ u 5o r STA TEMENT OF OWNERSHIP Tr�rIC7_ l�)Cl _,271v-77� o/ i ?7s s _I - 905 P'�O90 7 po1565 y N 5� w 9Y A - i �r / Ty rC I T IIID. <?11-19r) 1 HEREBY STATE THAT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED UNDER MY EpSNC .0 \/ SUPERVISION AND THAT THE OWNER OF RECORD HAS KNOWLEDGE h 68. /LP / �0 4 X160' Pot j NATURAL AREA TO OF AND CONSENTS TO THE FILING OF THIS MAP. 44 , 55 ESMT � RZ i BE PRESERVED 1l} 1 l r r \ p T��r , r I � P 0� 1 \ v mi.\ > � TYP/CAL STREET SECT/ONS / I NATURAL AREA TO \\ \ \^ \ oY \\\c \ ss' pol�so TeE FA IF 11 BE PRESERVED \ mop ` 25• 1S r`,�„ DITCH, TYP - 1 �� � � SERVICE ROAD ANo MO p,1 C _.. r / - / TRAC-r J` D, �JeJBr� PEDEsrRIAN AccrsS ONLY -_� ^ -&o 2.; . po1560 .s 'y0 / ' EMERGENCY -�j� /, s, 16 rn d ,0 3'B , i '`V• INGRLSS EGRESS > _ IT gg / _ � �r ITCH, TIC ^ b � 6//' �/ { ` _ 3' TOE DITCH, TYP _ 1 - 6 a NATUIRAL AREA TO BE PRESERVED 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK f � EMERGENCY 'INGREss/EGRESS 7•p �SSEC7T�ION A—A •%p NORTHERLY CL SOUTHERLY ENTRY ' PORTION OF "As STREET R/W R/W R/W R/W R/N' 46' R R/W \. RIGHT-OF-WAY TO 54' R/W 54' R/W 1W BE DEDICATED TO THE (PRIVATE)aTY� 61AMOND BAR 27.0' 27.0' 27.0' 27.0• 23.0' 23.0' r 1 9.0' 36' 9.0'1 I 14.0' 26' 14.0' I 36 5' 78' 18' S' 1V� 14' S' 18' 78' 5' 4'1 14, 10' 13' 13' f0' 411 p• g• g• p• 2' 2�R WY PKW 2WYI� ,,��PKW 2 2' PKWY PKWY 2, 0,�RKING P/IRKING / 81 RKIJc� RKInc�2^ V' 2v W 2� OOH• 2 D, 11 L �P SIDEWALK SIDEWALK SIDEWALK SIDEWALK SIDEWALK SIDEWALK Q rvmo i ruoo x SECTION B—B ENTRY • PORTION OF "A" STREET (PRIVATE) 1 50 50 I 8' 42' 4 35' 8' MDI N 3• I 2.0% - 2.09 Tim T IUr J9"� URB 6" CURB &GUTTER 6" CURB &GUTTER ' SIDEWALK SECTION L—L EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) WALL CURB & CURB & GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER SECTION E—E SECTION C—C SECTION D—D 'B' STREET - LOCAL STREET 'A' STREET - LOCAL STREET 'A' STREET IF LOCAL STREET (TAPER) PARKING BOTH SIDES PARKING BOTH SIDES NO PARKING (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) r PROPOSED NIEROWNENTS R/W 112' 1 50' I 54' I� 42' 8' 4' 42' 8'1 M DIiN I I I 1 _ I 2.0% ® CURR 6" CURB & GUTTER 8' SIL \-6" CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK -8' SIDEWALK SECTION L—L PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) 50' 50' 35' 4' 45' -6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER - SECTION M—M EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) r PROPOSED W R/W i NTPROVQIIN/S R/W 718' I 50' 60' I 8' 8' 35' 4' 63' I I 3• I M DIAN I -� 3' 207 I SOX s CURB L PROPOSED 8" CURB & GUTTERfi" CURB &GURETAINING WALL TTER 8' SIDEWALK PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK SECTION M—M PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) ' ?IF- `_ F. (-7-/ // i rL �• \\ a' ^O� 9-j515 N Ol' ti / - 8' EASEMENT 12' EASEM NT 2' 15.0' 2' \ \ i ' 2' 0.5• EASEMENT 0.5• ' 12.0' 2' 1$%'NATURAL A A `\05' 05' j62 0.5' BE- ESE ED0-tow \ \ \ 1:1 2''4 �2q1 11 ,T.,1 414-0 SWALE SWALE1 '✓"Y T, 8 / / / �\ AC BERM J AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM NATURAL AREA \ SECTION 1-1 SECTION J—J SECTION K—K / BEPRESERVED EMERGENCY ACCESS ROAD SERVICE ACCESS ROAD PEDESTRIAWSERVICE ACCESS ROAD 7 /v \ I (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) n / \ \)NATURAL AREA �/ ���55 0 0 o g E PRESERVED f0 ❑ 0 0 J 35' 32' 326' m 4• � FL Y8• y• 3• v FL pg• FL 19• 2.875' v FL 26' 2.875' MIN. TRAVEL MIN. MIN. TRAVEL PARKING MIN. TRAVEL MIN. 1 .ZQx Asx _.oz 4" ROLLED O" CURB d" ROLLED 6°CURB 4" ROLLED 0' CURB \\ GDR CURB DR SECTION F—F SECTION G—G SECTION H—H PRIVATE STREET PRIVATE STREET TYPICAL PRIVATE DRIVE (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) AND FlRE LANE (PRIVATE) PROPOSm IMPROVOORS DE rF►1 r PROPOSED r PROPOSED I I NMRO"ODS CE I NIPROWEMENTS 100' R/W RAV I 1 6' I R/IY R/W 80 REW R/W 92' I R/W 50' 50' 50' I 1 56' 1 40' 40' 40, 52' 35' 14' 35' 8' 8' 42' I 4' I 4/' 1 8' 3- 8' 32' 32' 8' II MEQ IAN I I M DI N I 8' 32' 44' 8'I Ttt2.0% 2.OS I 2.09 2L I 2DR ,� s PROPOSED 6" CURE" CURB. & GUTTER CURB L RETAINING WALL 6" CURB &GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER L i 6" CURB' & GUTTER B" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK — EXISTING 8' SIDEWALK 6" CURB & GUTTER 9' SIDEWALK 8' SIDEWALK PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK SECTION N—N SECTION N—N SECTION 0-0 SECTION 0-0 EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. EXISTING BREA CANYON ROAD PROPOSED BREA CANYON ROAD (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) TOTAL AREA OF GRADING =18.62 AC AREA OF CUT = 5739 AREA OF FULL = 4271 EDWARD A. MANDICH 7.2213 FIRE AND PLANNING LP DATE REVISION BY > 0O P !OPOSED Pad=7 6.0' -' rn PRIC POSED A" ST. Lot 29 & 30ms �OI --\a vmt - EXIS ING GRADE Lot 39 - - ISTING 'P ----------- ------- -_- S. DIAMOND BAR -'- OPOSE Pa =727"5 BLVD. j PacII25' Pa =7220' "B"ST. pi Lot PROP SED R AINING WALL ��\-p OPOSE RETAIN NG W PR L POSED GRADE m 840 < / o / ^ --"""' 3 / Poli \\ ,139.5 \ \\ Nva MP -40 MEDIA FILTER THEY SHALL BE EITHER QUITCLAIMED, ABANDONED OR RELOCATED TO THE 1 n \\ vc\ p \ \ % SATISFACTION OF ALL INTERESTED PARTIES. DRAINAGE AND PUBLIC UTILITY EX SIGNAGE TO BE - /x'!= - 'd �.� \ \ �y r rm\ TO BE RELOCATED /p , _y 305 73 0 \�\ \u\\\ �� TREATMENT BMP EASEMENTS NECESSARY TO SERVE THIS PROJECT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE Boo 71RAL7 J'k I0t'JY� \ _ ^^ y -� - sl t m\ I CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AND WITH THE UTILITY PURVEYORS. EXISTING STORM DRAIN ` j \ o r --& Id PtiS -� p \N\\ ps1}99 i \S NATURAL AREA TO - (� EASEMENTS WILL BE ABANDONED DURING THE FINAL MAP PROCEDURES. BE PRESERVED PROPOSED SIGNAL / " /.91111 A 'o\ psl 1 �i o� �� o -_ / / I )�I S. MULTI FAMILY BUILDING TO MEET NFPA 13 STANDARDS. •' \ y }0� \ `nom �i I CONNECT TO EXISTING ••VA/ o \ _ zB0 \ t0" ACP WATER � v � _ I EX/ST/NG EASEMENTS 9. ESTIMATED EARTHWORK QUANTITIES: 415,500 LYS. CUT, 415,500 LYS. FILL. ps136 12 5 � 1 N 3,¢ pR 1NUFY 10. SEWER SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION \ M U R O2 EASEMENT 70 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES DISTRICT. 6 \5 p 871g. _ REC FEBRUARY 8, 1954 /N BOOK 43774, PAGE 241, UR 720 � - \ ' W - s \ r?2 " �f / / \ � , P' R` � � d� M � ;95 I \\ WPtV 11. PER LA COUNTY FIRM PANEL 1880 OF 2350. / 30' LANDS PES a 5Ir pslil5 -I 2 \ 1199 �fi>,r''j/ 2' pol \ m \o p5E ZER O3 EASEMENT TO GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, A CORPORATION ,9- \V ps13g5 \ -- '� FOR POLE LINES REC APRIL 28, 1954 /N BOOK 44446, PAGE 33 0R 12. PRIVATE WATER QUALITY BMP'S TO BE MAINTAINED BY H.O.A. / \2 a \ CV 6Bo � ,0•V1 � � C G � `vl I sltg9 2. "�. p a � app \\\\ \\... O6 EASEMENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR STORM GRAIN PURPOSES AS SHOWN ON TRACT No. 27577 REC IN 13. LOTS 62 & 63 ARE TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR &MAINTAINED 4 16 .0. " \ P s1'L1S9 // sl BY THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 A80 520 560 600 640 680 720 760 800 840 880 920 / - t 6 :�, \ \ p / E P \ \ \ BK 702, PGS. 22 70 25 INCLUSIVE OF MAPS RECORDS LOS ANGELES COUNTY. /To SIGNAGE TO BE 5 \ i t l TO BE RELOCATED �-I- � � % � 0 ®e S _� \ \ 0 6 MSE I \qea i \� �-1�' _ - - O EASEMENT 70 THE PUBLIC FOR WATER PIPELINES REC. AUGUST 31, 7960 AS INSL No. 3278, IN BK; 14. ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG DIAMOND BAR BLVD,. BREA CANYON RD AND -1 RIGHT-OF-WAY TO / o 0 0 _ o \� ^� ps11%' ps1 \ \ Ps -- _L _ _ _ _ PASADO DR. TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. / / I TR ICT 1117 _15DT.�l o'•� BE DEDICATED TO THE -F - � R°' " �'Psj1 \\\\ PsJA s1�5 \ \\ NO PAGE 305, OR. SURVEYORS N07E.' EASEMENT FOLLOWS THE CENTERLINE OF DIAMOND BAR BTW, / I CITY OF DIAMOND BAR a 2d \ 5c 1� l 6 0 - p l NO W/DTH IS GIVEN IN THE DOCUMENT 15. ALL TRASH 15 INDIVIDUAL PICK UP BY WASTE MANAGEMENT. TRASH PICK UP FOR i / $ / g -'� �5 �'a I sT6'\� g�+ .5 \ \ \ \ I, 17 EASEMENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR STREET PURPOSES AS SHOWN ON TRACT No. 25989 REC. IN BK 714, LOTS 2 THROUGH 5 NEEDS TO BE LOCATED ON "B'• STREET. TRASH PICK UP FOR EX.- 12' ACP WATER " 1`' -• P o, Q.' 10 \ s ?,i756.5 s13 \ ) 405 1 ro 1� gRUw P LOT 1 WILL BE ALONG THE LOOP ALLEY. m. ,p eb \ J 4a� . j ( P 2 • 01 p PGS 5 70 7 OF MAPS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY / /TO�BE RELOCATED _ EASEMENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR STORM DRAINS AND SANITARY SEWER AS SHOWN ON TRACT NO. 27577 16, LOTS 1-5 TO BE MAPPED FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES. r PROPOSED MEDIA m. / 'CUi Iyy. '� \ �.. ,-1gp \. o \� \ ps136 P' s \\\\ 111 .. \ \ BETPRESER ED URAL AREA TO EX POWER POLE/ oVfl / ps113 g -, P \ \ 2' ps1115 \ �, 7 ? WqD\ \ . ^ \\- V I I I REC IN BK 702, PGS 22 TO 25 INCLUSIVE OF MAPS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY. STORM DRAIN SYSTEM TO BE PRIVATE. 70 BE RELOCA� �'- -5 g0 n 141 V A Ps _V - ® EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN COUNT/ES GAS COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA FOR GAS PIPE LINES, LIGHT, POWER 6" 7.6" PROPOSED SIGNAL - a$ 1 ' ' Psl S / 186 V A A g0 _ ---- 18. EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED PER TREE SURVEY. C.F. PER PIAN 6" 12" 12" MODIFICATION CL - ,� FII( .1 - s1 \ 5 V l // A - PURPOSES REC FEBRUARY 17, 1964 REC AS INSL 3774, OR. W DIAMOND BAR BLVD 10" __ _ PROPOSED ft/Wi ,N --- � � � VA X1,3 � p A o � I p AVo A p�l� 1 & BREA CANYON RD. F o_- p 18 \ _ _ - �g 0 vv CUi a c ,2 AG V V v 5 x116 v i 61 V EASEMENT TO THE DIAMOND BAR WATER COMPANY FOR WATER PIPES REC AUGUST 31, 9960 REG. IN BK. 1-1/2 i,:, t PROPOSED EWA K i '' '� �' p i1 9` 185 V A 72 P I 3• A '� �' 168.5 s" V 0-962, PAGE 305, OR. AND REC. DATE: AUGUST 10, 1964 AS INST. No. 3417, OR R_ 1/2" R=3' .,,�; � � _ _ $ $ $ .. ` �� / i 0 AAVA 0� � ,1133 _ o !v Psl AV A � � 0 P ? SURVEYOR'S NOTE, EASEMENT FOLLOWS THECENTERLINE OF DIAMOND BAR BLVD., NO WIDTH IS GIVEN .. 12„W� 3 5 ti -_ _ EX R/W '- .. T ,1A�'. P hd� yF V . V A Ps 180 Ol 6 Pi188. 33 oa A IN THE DOCUMENT UTILITY 2 o c. s. TY AGENCIES .. � R=1/z• e :".,<;. FL R=1/2” - _ _ o _ -- 2,• -Ex cuee.�� �... ,..:':.: •t4 �111�1 2' vv ,� HIv ° v 5 v v v t.Z _ A W� TRASH: (SINGLE FAMILY HOMES) e v vv 1,1 1,8. vvl- - 8l? v ' • ' •->• _ EX. POKER POI - _ o� _ -- �- "r"' p s. 5 ` O 1 4' w Pz 9 \ aM . ' 6- . = 6a Pi1 NATURAL AREA 6 EASEMENT TO THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FOR SANITARY SEWER PURPOSES REC. NOVEMBER 11, 1971 WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WASTE MANAGEMENT INC. ' -• - - -.; ..: : ° iO BE RELOCATED 12 W-� tz W p_ _-- N _. /' v v , ? vy P ,s' �5! ov v��` 5 p=119 a- 35 6� U, ; BE PRESERVED 'i AS INST 3366, O.R. 271 S. BREA CANYON ROAD 13940 E. LIVE OAK AVE. A\ \ 1 q \ RE ps1 sp I V g' Y 1• l0 i '' - WALNUT, CA 91789 BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 •- . .:.:;:- .'.: / X23 - _- _ ___ j r ps. " 12 � ��-psl8 • - •- .. . - � � e- psl � � s8° S � 9 - V p �, � � / � 7 EASEMENT TO THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FOR STORM DRAIN, INGRESS AND EGRESS REC. DATE (909) 595-7554 (800) 266-7551 o \ ,9 .. , 36 MAY 982 AS INST. 82-508759, O.R. 5 _2 v v sL poP ' ,. v . v v �- p L, 2d' ,•• Z slp6' v v 11 32 " A A 6 TELEPHONE SERVICE: TRASH: FOR MULTI -FAMILY O RIGHT-OF-WAY TO ti 1 680 MP -40 �' TDRM IN P V 4'se \ l 1 4' R 9a i' 60 t,,p1 R3T H 18 1 BE DEDICATED TO THE EDTA FILTER 8 LOW FLOW X p� 6 6 s1 31 's V 1,51 , 1 A M V , v - 6 3 6 'o' �/ VERIZON VALLEY VISTA INC. ^ O Dll/ERSION 'o sl 1 - ,....r 6 b8 1a% •N 1 1 s" 1 5 8 P, 8 0 \ ` / / ✓{` 3' BROW�� /q G mrD 6, ry RB & GUM �ITY OF DI MOND BAR `a - EATMENT P To P p8 P - vv w P` 6 -1 �FII( CUi / UITCH, irP 1400 PHILLIPS RANCH RD. BALDW E. LIVE OAK AVE. 4 ROLLED CURB k GUTTER {.VI4U W� 4LI� d / - / � _ � -T G7uRE -' � � � <^ _ r \ � �q � � � 9 bd r i i � I �` POMONA, CA 91766 BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 7 / v -- _ a A p0.2 25 S ps1116 ��, vv ps1151 7 5 as4-y&r �� 1 : o �s� /c v sj855 �- 3 0 s /� / & _ ) ( (800) 483-5000 (800) 266-7551 NIS NTS `Fill / //' v v ° � P � /� z • _ >� 1 � " I (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) / '/ /Psl I/�s 1 �2 \ s1%61 3 r'/ r'3�., 0 o.uMp y \ \���� ps1134 v p j 60 r �5 r '`\ '( ELECTRIC SERVICE: CABLE N � T.1 I � ; I I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. TIME WARNER 013 51 �;,/ / P� ,1615 �.II _ 59 S�N DIMASG CA V91773 GLENDORA,OCAE96740 Ps114 \ s1 I e 1 N 1..i, NATURAL AREA To -.- �I (800) 655-4555 3' EX- US 9 e° / /// / \\ `'% o� �' 6�\ po71 69a i \ po1�'S i a s-�/ e2 P'1610 P'O I_ i o-7 BE PRESERVED l �I jT �1-+- �I POSTAL SERVICE: _ s, o \ r DI7C�E7YP - - _. 4 " „ \, 1'J �€ , .. ,r ! O GAS SERVICE: USPS GARAGE / /EX k/w 7i ��02/ / / A' o s" p ` 7 s1 ,' ps11 1 _ - 1 ,r / '> N1 0 A,5 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. DIAMOND SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BLVD. / 0 � o: DOOR EX POWER POLE r CU ym�•� 0`u s- / / a r. p ) o/ 5 t -'� ` �1 1919 S, STATE COLLEGE BLVD. DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 T AND U 6•• ANAHEIM, CA 92806 (800) 27 TILITIES PR POSED RB RF ^� / 4 a - l l ^/ �� �. m r 3 5-8777 CUN /W ^o �_ /� 2i 2� %MM 70 BE RELOCATED PROPOSED R ps1111 q 3 PEDESTRIAN / p 'r9� �i� ps185•rJ Bo �I \v �Dl'r > �, w- 1,2A 27-2200 SEWER SERVICE: (TR UNK LINES( (800) 4 ,i,• / T� / Opp // / 0f A / o 'z '•'. ps > /8 b�� / �' / o �s `< v s� ss: G `L^ .r -- SCHOOL DISTRICT: LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT WALNUT VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT 1955 WORKMAN MILL ROAD W4i a § / / / ! /•�o^ ,'17 880 SOUTH LEMON AVE. WHITTI(562)E6 CA 90607 06 SR\� P 1 i/ > / `. ,l 90 / �. 61 A \: �.. pot CI r i> _ \/ WALNUT. CA 91789 (562) 699-7411 / /o / h //��° 6/ / I // / /y. l / `> - 0 m. 16 / / Ams // > P, h3 ^ 6 a la polo- , \� 16o HE 93 _ /' SEWER SERVICE. (MAIN LINES) 0 3 I lob U CURB DETAIL / " / �`O�� h / // - 'r / / / 1` r ,153 , , r >. / a^ A'C r I LOS ANGELES COUNTY OF PUBLIC WORKS e / m. p' 2 �4 0 v r ri ) SEWER MAINTENANCE DISTRICT r Y r r 9� . s GUi NTS � < / / h O / � / Ic Zt / / / 'L 6 . \ � , r I (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) / / p 675 / O / / - "a / / >O LOT a' � `' \ O ^ - tS `P ' ° sz & 181 5 r r / 900 LHAM BR , NTCA g L0V 6.3 / 0 00 / / ��A. , r a �..., > P> \o r >' r .Q o , / -<<°. r .y _.. p r , ALHAMBRA. CA a �9 IPA / `O� o / 1 v r� / /y. $ r' ��C �/5� 6t �'Py' r 4. r / s>, q �� r L Jr'i sT 3' BROW / / J \ 4, / h / / 90i' 3K'- r r r s1� 2 I, r .\o Q J• y r er DITCH, TYP C / cslrII�.P�� a s> RTft ,o A o BENCH MARK s rlc� r 76 ' tia / q0 s 4 . FI 1 /._ // _ \ / / / �" '\� >> , r , Q NATURAL AREA TOi p XISTING / e� / e s> r 0- - 40 ('` - S h\ v , BE PRESERVED' LOS ANGELES COUNTY BENCHMARK NO. G 5073 ELEVATION: 726.809 DATUM: NAVD 88, B / U ERGROUNO / °' / / /'by ^° h 3 1• r/ Po 5 r 111.5 / ,ri 0� \ I \ 2005 ADJUSTMENT ti Fill @ e, b 26' r' / 0 / Pr. / R CE FLOWS �ry� 7a / ooP 61 I I/ M• / / / �0 r /b . BUY ^3P o _ mom, / "` RS f '\° i x18,.5 - -1 9 / i/ /_ 7 R r> Q o°j h n ,� h o / / �ti a>, r< P/ y DESCRIPTION: LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TAG IN EAST CURB OF DIAMOND BAR BLVD. 42.7 .FEET EAST OF CENTERLINE AND 95 FEET NORTH OF CENTERLINE OF �p�k4� /�' / �Q�OPGT CROOKED CREEK DRIVE. " �Q• I �- -- / / l>o C 1 r.. r 6 moo\ pot sP �b / /Y \� mss• - \ 11,2 'r PSI _ LEGAL DESCRIPTION I F / ^e As'x> 0�5 .a� 9j/g \✓ s>'r7 �, / po11 L \ �P c /� FlRE TRUCK ��� \ 6 — 5.oR = 1 :: N a 61 �.a 11 P/1 15 s e5 o106.Oss" J, s , s \ �. ' S� 0/ / e/ � BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 9 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO TURNING RADIUS DETAIL �� ^ — i a ' �5 s P A� 0 6 • ti / MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, GOUTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. J. 9, m �O � / ° EC /, c rr h .\9 ij 3' TOE .._ v - �✓�� � a1 � / �. V 690 7! OS ' � r' � '��+ '.a 0 60 0. 69 b.. � IB' r y0• �rii DITCFY TYP / 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK (/ 1 / / ,/ ry9 v 6, ?,1-- 16 v "rz^y - 9 r' / _ _ u 5o r STA TEMENT OF OWNERSHIP Tr�rIC7_ l�)Cl _,271v-77� o/ i ?7s s _I - 905 P'�O90 7 po1565 y N 5� w 9Y A - i �r / Ty rC I T IIID. <?11-19r) 1 HEREBY STATE THAT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED UNDER MY EpSNC .0 \/ SUPERVISION AND THAT THE OWNER OF RECORD HAS KNOWLEDGE h 68. /LP / �0 4 X160' Pot j NATURAL AREA TO OF AND CONSENTS TO THE FILING OF THIS MAP. 44 , 55 ESMT � RZ i BE PRESERVED 1l} 1 l r r \ p T��r , r I � P 0� 1 \ v mi.\ > � TYP/CAL STREET SECT/ONS / I NATURAL AREA TO \\ \ \^ \ oY \\\c \ ss' pol�so TeE FA IF 11 BE PRESERVED \ mop ` 25• 1S r`,�„ DITCH, TYP - 1 �� � � SERVICE ROAD ANo MO p,1 C _.. r / - / TRAC-r J` D, �JeJBr� PEDEsrRIAN AccrsS ONLY -_� ^ -&o 2.; . po1560 .s 'y0 / ' EMERGENCY -�j� /, s, 16 rn d ,0 3'B , i '`V• INGRLSS EGRESS > _ IT gg / _ � �r ITCH, TIC ^ b � 6//' �/ { ` _ 3' TOE DITCH, TYP _ 1 - 6 a NATUIRAL AREA TO BE PRESERVED 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK f � EMERGENCY 'INGREss/EGRESS 7•p �SSEC7T�ION A—A •%p NORTHERLY CL SOUTHERLY ENTRY ' PORTION OF "As STREET R/W R/W R/W R/W R/N' 46' R R/W \. RIGHT-OF-WAY TO 54' R/W 54' R/W 1W BE DEDICATED TO THE (PRIVATE)aTY� 61AMOND BAR 27.0' 27.0' 27.0' 27.0• 23.0' 23.0' r 1 9.0' 36' 9.0'1 I 14.0' 26' 14.0' I 36 5' 78' 18' S' 1V� 14' S' 18' 78' 5' 4'1 14, 10' 13' 13' f0' 411 p• g• g• p• 2' 2�R WY PKW 2WYI� ,,��PKW 2 2' PKWY PKWY 2, 0,�RKING P/IRKING / 81 RKIJc� RKInc�2^ V' 2v W 2� OOH• 2 D, 11 L �P SIDEWALK SIDEWALK SIDEWALK SIDEWALK SIDEWALK SIDEWALK Q rvmo i ruoo x SECTION B—B ENTRY • PORTION OF "A" STREET (PRIVATE) 1 50 50 I 8' 42' 4 35' 8' MDI N 3• I 2.0% - 2.09 Tim T IUr J9"� URB 6" CURB &GUTTER 6" CURB &GUTTER ' SIDEWALK SECTION L—L EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) WALL CURB & CURB & GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER SECTION E—E SECTION C—C SECTION D—D 'B' STREET - LOCAL STREET 'A' STREET - LOCAL STREET 'A' STREET IF LOCAL STREET (TAPER) PARKING BOTH SIDES PARKING BOTH SIDES NO PARKING (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) r PROPOSED NIEROWNENTS R/W 112' 1 50' I 54' I� 42' 8' 4' 42' 8'1 M DIiN I I I 1 _ I 2.0% ® CURR 6" CURB & GUTTER 8' SIL \-6" CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK -8' SIDEWALK SECTION L—L PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) 50' 50' 35' 4' 45' -6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER - SECTION M—M EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) r PROPOSED W R/W i NTPROVQIIN/S R/W 718' I 50' 60' I 8' 8' 35' 4' 63' I I 3• I M DIAN I -� 3' 207 I SOX s CURB L PROPOSED 8" CURB & GUTTERfi" CURB &GURETAINING WALL TTER 8' SIDEWALK PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK SECTION M—M PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) ' ?IF- `_ F. (-7-/ // i rL �• \\ a' ^O� 9-j515 N Ol' ti / - 8' EASEMENT 12' EASEM NT 2' 15.0' 2' \ \ i ' 2' 0.5• EASEMENT 0.5• ' 12.0' 2' 1$%'NATURAL A A `\05' 05' j62 0.5' BE- ESE ED0-tow \ \ \ 1:1 2''4 �2q1 11 ,T.,1 414-0 SWALE SWALE1 '✓"Y T, 8 / / / �\ AC BERM J AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM NATURAL AREA \ SECTION 1-1 SECTION J—J SECTION K—K / BEPRESERVED EMERGENCY ACCESS ROAD SERVICE ACCESS ROAD PEDESTRIAWSERVICE ACCESS ROAD 7 /v \ I (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) n / \ \)NATURAL AREA �/ ���55 0 0 o g E PRESERVED f0 ❑ 0 0 J 35' 32' 326' m 4• � FL Y8• y• 3• v FL pg• FL 19• 2.875' v FL 26' 2.875' MIN. TRAVEL MIN. MIN. TRAVEL PARKING MIN. TRAVEL MIN. 1 .ZQx Asx _.oz 4" ROLLED O" CURB d" ROLLED 6°CURB 4" ROLLED 0' CURB \\ GDR CURB DR SECTION F—F SECTION G—G SECTION H—H PRIVATE STREET PRIVATE STREET TYPICAL PRIVATE DRIVE (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) AND FlRE LANE (PRIVATE) PROPOSm IMPROVOORS DE rF►1 r PROPOSED r PROPOSED I I NMRO"ODS CE I NIPROWEMENTS 100' R/W RAV I 1 6' I R/IY R/W 80 REW R/W 92' I R/W 50' 50' 50' I 1 56' 1 40' 40' 40, 52' 35' 14' 35' 8' 8' 42' I 4' I 4/' 1 8' 3- 8' 32' 32' 8' II MEQ IAN I I M DI N I 8' 32' 44' 8'I Ttt2.0% 2.OS I 2.09 2L I 2DR ,� s PROPOSED 6" CURE" CURB. & GUTTER CURB L RETAINING WALL 6" CURB &GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER L i 6" CURB' & GUTTER B" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK — EXISTING 8' SIDEWALK 6" CURB & GUTTER 9' SIDEWALK 8' SIDEWALK PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK SECTION N—N SECTION N—N SECTION 0-0 SECTION 0-0 EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. EXISTING BREA CANYON ROAD PROPOSED BREA CANYON ROAD (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) TOTAL AREA OF GRADING =18.62 AC AREA OF CUT = 5739 AREA OF FULL = 4271 EDWARD A. MANDICH DATE W.O. FEET 50 120 GROSS AREA 0 30 D h CONTOUR INTERVAL INCHES TOTAL LOTS MAP DATE IDENTIFIER WE Of IAIECT CHANGE TO THIS MFH 7/30/13 BY: LP WTE OF TPIS PLOT 09/19 13 ly 30, 2013 1855-162AX 29.7 AC.± 5' PREPARED FOR. PREPARED BY.• OWNER.• t t LENNAR® Z ai 25 ENTERPRISE ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656 (949) 349-8100 HUNSAKER 6c ASSOCIATES Z I R V I N E I N C %ANNING ENLINEEBINC 9l1RVEYINL Three Hughes lrol , CA WI Hf: (949) 5830]59 PIk (949) Sg3t01g � GRAD/NG PLAN I VEST/NG TENTATIVE TRACT 72295 F:\0718\Planning\OA_Project\GRADING PLAN\0718P_GRADING PLAN. dwg 7.2213 FIRE AND PLANNING LP DATE REVISION BY DATE W.O. FEET 50 120 GROSS AREA 0 30 D h CONTOUR INTERVAL INCHES TOTAL LOTS MAP DATE IDENTIFIER WE Of IAIECT CHANGE TO THIS MFH 7/30/13 BY: LP WTE OF TPIS PLOT 09/19 13 ly 30, 2013 1855-162AX 29.7 AC.± 5' PREPARED FOR. PREPARED BY.• OWNER.• t t LENNAR® Z ai 25 ENTERPRISE ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656 (949) 349-8100 HUNSAKER 6c ASSOCIATES Z I R V I N E I N C %ANNING ENLINEEBINC 9l1RVEYINL Three Hughes lrol , CA WI Hf: (949) 5830]59 PIk (949) Sg3t01g � GRAD/NG PLAN I VEST/NG TENTATIVE TRACT 72295 F:\0718\Planning\OA_Project\GRADING PLAN\0718P_GRADING PLAN. dwg 60 SCALE DESIGN SITE D 7�� 1p�� 13 F7.A C CG.4 i' .� .2 F 1 C5,7 C6.7 C5,2 C2. C9.(i C CA.7 CE l,2 L:! 'f U.7 C't4.f C 7 Cl 4 C2.B A.4 07,8 1,..5 C10.1 G13_ :15.2 0..f . C14.'L Cil.7C-.3 CUTFILL F d.4 1`0.7 3 CL1 7 CB.9 CID cl3.5 177 1 017.7 c16 9 015.0 CIS A C[ 6 440 C::, f," 3 ,3 C C3.0 C'i.0 Ct-- LJ. `u [I 5,n l;1/.11 019 C:19�9 C... 7 011 C� F)qAW VOLUME 4 159 f ■ 4099 570 CYS 870 0.4. 01,'/ Cd .9 C7.D S 04,5 05.9 .9 f. 117 ,U 073.0 015.7 CF C20.f 022.2 24 024.3 022,3 G18, C]].Fl0.1 L 1G 5 CYS 2 CI C4.7 06.4 '.,6 011.7 C13. CB 3 (12.' 016.1 B C2P 6 1,'23.2 G27.0 026.9 026.7 C24.A C2 t. 9 Cd.0 9 0 CEDL C13.2 7. 013.7 050.4 C'..0 C11_l .4.5 Cfe,d 56 015.3 017.8.0 L"7_.1 +"_.! C2tE_7 029.2 029.6 C30.0 029,3 C27.5 024.9 J6 C9_:; U; 0.9. C14.2 4.1 014,8 CI0,2 C 5 010,2 C CI C2U.s' :21.5 023,0 0.2 C20`c 114.2 G3F1.7 091.7 032 30,0 029. .P. 02:1 074-4 f..4.7 0 1:14.7 016. Ci6.7 C 6 019.1 A CA .C: CIO.1 020.8 .24.1 C i 0.2 C' ,. C32.0 C33.9 ['33.4 1:33.A .I'S '30,4 030.5 C31 8 C:3 .. C32.9 130.0 C2.0,U C27 :19,1 CO -7 CO. ash r .9 013 1 1:12.0 C1G.5 019 049.6 075.6 2' .5 CP2.1 023.0 024, 0.i C"1`0 0 C21.5 1,`24,::1 ? .[ .. .i.7 035.6 GAG. 8 C36,1 035 3 .4 031,6 032.1 l: 9.13 029,8 C71.Ci C::3a.0 f. .7 C"53.3 031.3 0.2. NOTE: i • BASED O THE J 20 12 AERIAL C^ Cie 7 CL9 5 G15 7 4 C22 5 F,?. 9 C2 3.8 0:3.7 C24 C25 2 027.5 CS 3 0.1 033.7 035.7 C96.I C37 7 32.4 07.3 C I.4 C, i C31.4 032 2 32 C3Q 7 C30.7 7 033.5 --34.7 C-34.9 C 2 ti C 7. C Cl C96.D 0;2].5 G25.d "29 1 C3Q,4 I; IS. 024 3 -,.4 1,'16.5 027 _ C26.5 077,0 0.6 029. f.' -_, C33.5 034.7 037.1 ['3fl.2 36 .7 "3!5.1 029.9 1:30.2 0.:1 B 5;31.2 C (1.9 C3].d '3U.P 031.,' G32.5 3.1 C34.B 1:35.6 C 0.4 0.1:.7 C: ..►RA OF GRADING- 28.62ACRES 0 9 {; 1'SA 2 I'4°i f C3F, 6 E3' 9 038.8 .35.9 035.4 036- 0.2 F 029.5 029,9 30,4 0.3 030,0 031,7 0.3 .4 030-7 031.5 ,32.9 0.3-1 077.11 35 H.6 CB 8 Cl. is SCALE.' 1 " = 60 ' C419EM1 07130113 03: 00 P. M. C 1,15 7 1,'1 7 023.2 629.8 039.1 0.3. 1 C3i ? 0..'9 _ L�,i. t1 1,26 5 l,c G�0.9 .29- - sj 0.2' G C, 4 C32.D 0;14.3 C3A 1 7i L 72 026.6 027,0 2 :iR,2 1,'36.1 1:3F.H 1:37.9 i.5 ,35.7 3.7 034,4 C 5.9 1`,3'.. 035.6 L'315.f 032.9 Ca 0:29.1 CLI.' 030.1 30.3 G:S1.A C' q [29.7 O'31:lL 1:3A.O '36 o 1:31,1 3 040 • 15. CS<7 04.`3 ..I CA. 1 010 A LL"1B.0 .0 3.2 0.5 C29� .33 5 G33.fi 033.3 032,9 .-3. 029 5 F 9. 030.5 C3i.i 034 7 C97.F.V ,37 2 C3B.9 37.5 033,5 034,0 [': .1 CY, 3 036.9 Cita 2 C•. V,1 C2B.5 029 3 030.0 G' I.- 030,8 (1:11.5 C 9.0 130.3 031.7 1,33.7 CG 7 G3B, ti C C. ..,1 C70.f f.:8.n 0.1 1,3 C5.5 1,'.5 CiP,B 020.2 1,.. 7. G3 5 032 8 032.4 C31.0 C31 0 C3QP C29 8 CAD,2 1,31. '"a.1` 094.6 C.' S 037.0 035,5 035.1. C". 3.0 C -...i 3J.6 034.1 C 7 C35.2 C35 7 C31 C2t1 •:8.7 G '.G C9U.3 I,,30.4 0'31.3 0. 1- 029.0 E31-3 033. C. 021 F ,21.2 C 0.1, 0 r I. .9 0'2.5 F3,A�70 1`5. F4.IS F2,5 C f:6,Q 1 1 G17.6 C25.B C25 '' 34 .`.i 031.4 030.7 029.9 026 8 L•2B.6 L"2'.8 f. ,4 C29.9 C 9 C35.A 035.4 C37 C37,B L34.! C32.5 032,8 C'-.2 C33. 1;3A. t 0.3 .D 27.8 ClB.S 1:2]. 0.2. 9 ti:3u,2 Cdi.0 [l.0 t' .d ,19.3 1,4 t ... 7 010.9 C15.7 1.7 C25 8 C26.3 C2i :3 .7 034.2 C29 7 C29.1 C28 .3 027 ,29.3 C25.3 C26 f 031.5 C34.0 C 3 C36,1 C37,O 0.3 .7 1:32.7 032,5 0.32 9 033.0 ''3 .P 033,7 034.:9 029 P 028,1 1`1 7 L'2.A 05.6 04.7 .. ., •, C .0 020.3 C?: C.r^ .. ;2 029-7 029-5 029 4 C26 0 020.0 C27.0 C29 7 '?� 0 L25i.0 C27 Y, 30.9 C 6 {:,-1.1.3 1,'35.1 036.1 'J C3� 031.6 C32.0 ry C 1`1 06.3 L .9 C4,7 C. - 0.1 .0 1,],n M. ,9.f I i _� [32,u C.. -i3..1 1,'3-. 1,'28. E23.7 4.}-.0 03,4 .3 .5 9 Ft6,7-.7 1`13.4 FIQ..1 FG.5 1`2.7 0.1 .,- • .5 C4... C4,7 CB,O 1 .A 019 i C' -7? C30 4 CY) 0 029.7 C29 C? '.;�.G 026 6 ,;:-.1 024.0 C23.2 22 .. 0'25.5 C29.5 Citi, '33.•1 C.d 4 1;34.6 035.6 C 5.5 C31 2 Cil1.`i C31.8 023.5 C 0.7.-0 E.],I'1 F]') 110. -2U 3 1`22 1`20 B 1`18,3 1`75 Q Fk3.5 1`10 5 1`6.14 '2 7 'S.B 1:7.3 1,11.'? 05.1 1,9,8 CSA, 073.6 013.0 0.7. 1,5.1 3. 7B0 -. " ... - ,.y" .- - 0. 3 '�6.F C2Fi e G20.b 027.0 0^2.,' G22.2 0.'2] 8 C 1`:',...0 026-7 7 1'7::: .!i t','J3..=. 1:3d.2 C15.F+. 3.7 '30.2 027- +., ..� 019.8 Si.S ., 7,d .4 .4 1`25,6 fi 0 1`24.4 F22.8 2}.,G 1`38.6 F-15.3 - 6 1`10.6 1`6 7 F. .3 1,'1 7 CY 5 Cf2 6 CP.4 1,'t-' Cill .3 f:'ES 07.5 .1 CE3. 019.0 C23.F C24.9 F; 2 6 C10.0 L .6.1` 0.6 Cb .2 GO.. '110,0 1,1,3,7 _ ,x.3.6 L2B,3 C30.A 030.7 28 02.1 ... C1f.6 0.1 CS6.3.3 C A. CIO 71` .q 4.9.' e 014.7 L'12.A C 7.1 Cif},4 f.l0,d C' .1 018,7 021.5 025.:3 024,0 e2 026.6 C._",7 027 G2G.1 14. 027.3 L' a -A �1. 9 020.1 [17 021.3 C27,4 0311,0 C32.0 0;33 0.3=4.3 C 2 027,0 I" .4 017 - CA.: F F_ 1`19.4 F27.d F. F26.4 F27 B 7.4 F26 7 F23,5 1`'1 7 F19 9 F17.3 F'11.7 9.. 1`1 0.7 C1`l. I? Cto. 9 C4,8 05 6 .7 Ct1.5 C18.3 C1l_1 Q C2 .700 .- - ��. a - 0..'7 G CfA.O 010.1 021,(1 C2a .3.9 C25.�. _2A.5 025.9 0.2 .0 C27.iJ ::: 027.3 027.3 Cr- .2 Ct7 4 077,9 097.4 0'7.0 07.0 029-5 092.0 C.� [:29.9 ''. .A 0.]7, 0.3, A ,3 F 1`30. 0 1`29.2 1`28 1`26-7 F2A,3 1`22 .3 5 14.1 1`70.3 FS.B 1`1 03.6 Fq F .p ',9 6 0.1.0 06.2 16.4 C12, [:1 6 10.0 CL0.S1 090.6 616.7 022.9 020,5 C32.3 [31 _i 026,6 r. H 1,17.3 016,3 .1 C12.6 Cll 4 0..3. C 1 7� - C.' I' a i 023 7 74.4 0.2 - .26.'.i ''7.7 C=' 1,27.3 02[.9 G2t5. :15,3 CI!-', 3 C1Ci,0 1,'1 ! C74.B C. 17.9 099.5 1,'20, [:76. 0.2, 3.7 3.5 .1 agv.�D.9 F _ 1`33.4 1`3 F34,p 1`32.9 F32� 1`33,-0 1`33.4 1`32 1 2B 124 F F2].O FlB 7 1`15 4 177.3 16.1 FO CS.A 7 F2 04.0 C.fE 1,13.7 CS3.5 013.3 C15 • C:;I .'.11 17..1 Ct3,9 (37. 1 C21.9 C29.5 C2C.9 L" GfA.4 11".T 017. (:111,9 056.1 CY9.3 07.0 .•9 -�] .2�. - b� 8 C 7.0 1',17.1 019- 027,7 ,I C24.s (;24.0 C26.1 C�7 028.9 C2F - ':±5.9 C25.A C 3.1 '12,4 C12.'.i C11.'a f. C14,6' 3.7 .9 F6,0 r,,5 ...3 1.1` F r_ 1`34 1`34.5 F35,6 F36 0 F36.P F36.0 F33,5 X9.5 .9 1`27.6 F29.B 728 9 F23.5 F r GLE 0 019-2 023.- C22�5 024.3 C:I.E - 023 2 _; 7.!1 .15.3 Cl6.7 022- 9•l C97�4 097.0 016. CS€../; .9 3 L; 1'9.2 018.0 018.4 '.3 .l . f P'17 -EI 619.1 ._! 022 '022,2 023.3 C; 5 023 ] C- 28,5 C 4 C25,C C24.fi 0.1 110-2 011. CG. 0.2, 70 1`12.8 F25, 1`3:. 1`37 137.9 'F 36.5 1`36.4 " 7.6 1`37,9 1`37.51`22.9 F2.3,7 F'24 B F25,6 ..7 1`2 .9 F. ! .9 Fl., 2 CIO I} [, 53.7 C28,6 C:)1-4 0.: ).9 C�.'6.5 L2f (i 0.,3 3 :e ,3 CS'".G C15 G CIO -7 19.1 C1 B.5 Cf8.6 015.9 C15.9 010 -18-•1 0:1.9,4 C'19.7 C20.0 L2Q.2 .0 C1B.1 S.7 C1�.� 019.. _ I . a _ r C 7 Cts 9 1,`77.0 1 4 0.2;_ '3 G21 .2 027,3 '2A '2G .5 C24.6 024.2 CF 9 '7-3 i:7 7 CF F 14,8 F .3 1` 5.3 F '.0 38-7 F3 F39.B F39.8 F40-3 1`3 F3;},y .3 3 F26.f 1`22.1 F18,3 F17,9 FI' 1 4 1`22.0 1`24.9 h2•I 6 F. .2 F F'fB6 r1.6 C27 r .7 031 :16.6 012.6 G93.3 074.1 ..7 CS7,2 011.9 018.5 L.. ifi .0 018,1 C1B.9 020.5 Cii,7 [.]7.' Cf7,_ B. Lf 8.1 L1l.0 1.17-., [, 6 17. - � a .4,1`] [: .7 C�7 2 [;3d C38.1Y ,31,1.2 3� 0 �3 -6 A 1`0 r - f C18.A C C1B.3 C19,3 021,1 20.3 17.5 017,9 016 C19,d 17.6 Clfi 018.] 071).6 19,6 C:'. G20.0 020.0 8.3 C19.3 C28.3 C2 C2A-9 E IS 06.9 0'.5.0 Cb A3 1`U.? �W 18.5 1`26 1`35. F .5 1`41.5 Fd1.5 F 1`i FAf .9 1`41.7 .` ,5 F34 .6 1`30.1 F24.Q FIS -2 1 F Ff4.D VIA F15,1 1`17.0 F1B.7 F 9 A 12 1 f `7.11. 2. [;10.7 -21.` (:: 1-1 037.•1 0:70. L3B. � ,37.p t3� fl 1,11 3 L1(V.9 [,11,3 012, ' Ctd,S .I.7 3.8 _ J CIA.1 0..1 GE9.5 '18-5 C19 Q 0.1 cit., E- 011.3 ,6.6 G2,' L;1.1 C3. r, = i F17.2 F25.2 F33.4 '40 , 1`4 F43,2 F'42.6 F42.5 3.5 1 F39.A F35,6 F31.1 1`2 5.d F12 4 F9.7 F9.0 F9.0 F'-9.5 F9.9 F12,0 F 2.6 FS 7 FO .13 :� 5 C.33.0 0.3 4 C 0,9 0.4 .5 0..4 FI [:301.3 -13.9 09.2 (:9 6 011.0 3.4 [;13_ 012.3 Ci3.2 013.5 :' 3.`} 037.3 +� -.., 1 .3. C'U_D 0.2 G76.3 '19,4 CiG r 010.3 CiA,6 -' `' 7d0 -I 7 C20.: '7.5 01'7,8 1,'9 018.6 CIA 0..1,6 029,5 1.1:1,8 _1 C]C3.3 03,4 1`3. 0,9 F C0.5 00.8 .5 F .3 F3f..8 F-18 „ 42,5 F42, 3.7 F43.5 f 4 .3 F39,A 1`3613 F'3 7 1`22.0 FI 1`90.5 h'B. F5 �a 1`4.0 F4.0 3 F5.1 F5.9 5.7 F.4 GO 017 8 03.0 032.7 038.7 V. Il C'�:I [.1.0 1,.3.1 + C.i.7 i;r. 07.7 08.5 0.`1.-. 012.11 0.7 012.1 093,2 C'i3.9 014.7 015.3 011.1 01`.1.'3 '.18.b 1.'11., 1 1 rz. b❑ - 015.0 Cl [:1f1.9 C'19.0 0.'2 0 019,6 C2C.0 C 9,/ 017.0 1'17.7 Cie. C 9 c;,1.0 C22.1 021.7 020.' C CA F1.5.5 18.3 F 1`17.7 F13 1 F5.9 .6 F2.0 1`1, F7 A F26.!,� 1`35.8 f-4 .6 F49.9 F44.0 F44. -45, 4 .3 1`40.4 F36,8 F' .2 1`27.4 1`22.3 F16.5 Fit ,2 79.9 FD. _ F0,2 FD.fi ' ..1 C d.6 I' 7.'3 C .1 .7 : 3. i'.:] .19.7 C- i A .29.5 1`.6 1 0.5 3 CG.3 .13.8 0.9. C 03.3 070.6 012.2 013.5 2 - / ❑ (f / C: .1 C f Fi_3 "73.9 C3D.G 455. 037.4 33. C. 0 08.8 G€i G .7 0.5. C7.I .O 06,4 C9. 9 031.5 013.0 G14.5 117.tS Cf .6 C .0 021.1 1:20,0 I'r1 .5 C2.1.t7 i.A 016.9 C B.G 021.] 024.8 ] I:Ei. 1`22 F 1`21.5 F2P .2 1`73.9 1`19.3 Fit .7 1`7:1`42 7 .7 F46.0 P44.9' F43.4 F'. 1. F3B.8 F34.A 27 1`21.9 1`19.. F15,7 F10.0 F4.8 C3.E. L CS.0 1`;S .O C2.ti 1 ep C16.A 015,5 .0 021.0 C 2C21.4 021.5 1..0 C.16,5 C19,5 C20.1 C19 02,11 D F2U. 1`2. 1`25. F24.5 F24 5F24.5 F24.2 1`22. 16, '12.5. F10,5 FO .7 1`12. 32.. 1`41.3 FAA.2 1`43.2 FA2, F41.7 F'7. F32.7 1`27.6 F .6 1`19.2 1`75.1 Ff I.. 1`'1 3 F9-2 .8 F3-2 C3.0 C6. 6 CS.d; C(I,7 1A.7 G. C2B,6 33.3 1,'3 31` 2 c .f, 4.7 C2�1 04.6 Lv �.7 0.7.. 06.6 07.0 09.5 010.6 092,3 0.1 3 .- 0.1COCS 014,'7 0.17.6 L. J.9 C21,1 C20.9 C21.5 C20. 075.6 C17.4 F J F ' 15.9 1`'27.4 1`26-0 fLIVU 2 126.5 F25.8 1`25.0 1`2..4 F l,B F15.6 F13.f i ..6 29. F39,0 F 4,3 F41.9 F39,5 1`37.2 �.4.5 31.2 F29.1 1`,. 22.5 FIB,8 F15,5 FID -5 F 3 1`1.2 C2.3 G3.9 C5. ]' 1,'.5. 2.0 l 028.0 21] =1 (..! 6 (:�. f:1i, .1 l.0 9 LC -A 1 1,5.7 05.3 CO.G9C 09.9 C1D,6 .` _ 3.3 F .0 23.A 1`'2 ,9 1`30,3 -2 1`30.0 f29,A F28.D 26.4 P2$.5 1` 2 F .a 1`18.6 1`17 A, F F .A 10. Fbp,3 1`42. 1`42.7 IFAO.2 F36 G I'3D.G 1`27.7 1`24, F 1`18,1 1`13.7 1`9,1 F 1`[1, C :i -.7 05.4 P_ 09.0 04,3 016.. (;79 ,20 .7 Ci'. - C d.1`'+ C .6 CE+.7 '9.0 CA 03,2 C4,2 C7.2 09,5 Cl 4 1:12.8 10.0 2,4 ClC15.7 CSA. <:21�1 9.5 C19.5 C16.2 A.1 C2,3 C2:,6 L 05.7 06.9 t:11.f, Ci'. C71),2 011. C13.2 1:15.3 11.4 020.- is C17. 2 10,6 F30 F .0 F32,5 F32.5 F32.5 31.1 F29.5 F28.0 1`26 '..9 1`20.2 Fig 1`79.8 F 1`.I 10,5 F42.1 F41,6 1`41.7 F41.s 1`39.9 - F25,4 F21.2 F 9. 15.5 FS1: F6.7 r 1`0. C4,3 C7.5 -.5 ,.6 4.5 Cu 1,'92.3 015.' 1:15 _ 0.7.] 1. 1;15.8 96.0 I; 1r.4 F .5 FO'.6 1,'0.: 0.`.i 5 - �y9 s� b 1 " i:4. ;3.3 02.3 02,3 02.3 03,5 C 7 L']7.•I C9.1i 09,8 1:14.1 "11.4 012.2 [:1-.5. ' 1,'15.3 0.3. 1`'9, 1`12. F .7 : 4.1` 1`34.2 1`]1 i.7 1`33,5 F32.6 1`32. 1`'71. '.6.' 1`23.4 1`21.9 1`20,`3 1`19.0 F-" 25 F .3 1`42.4 1'42.E 1`47.4 1`39.6 1`3. .5 1`29,3 F;74.f 2 .1 1`18.6 1`14.0 A.A FA.B 62. 1, C1.S1 06.1 0.9.' 05.9 03.0 .4 013.0 C aU 0 [: 1E.;1 r.9. 12.7 Y- 1 .2 1`10.5 1`3 0 1`5, S 1.�� 1,10,3 0,12, .lA, CIA f 0:74.1 Ci. P5 6 59.7 Fit 9 F2 Me .2 ci 3 C1.3 01,13 C2,7 CA. i7 09.1 CJ ' ca.a C9,3 C9-7 1, .3 et$.1 L"12,2 1 F1D F14 2.2 35.0 F35.3 1`35-6 F35. F34.0 1`33. 1`20.3 1'26.1 F24.2 F22,7 1`21.' F F ,7 41 F40.5 FAC 2 O. 1`42.1 FA 1,5 F 9 1`35,5 1`34.0 F 4. 21,1 F17.7 1`12.6 1`7.5 '1.3 C3.2 L'7.A CB.6 02.6 '1"i C 4 i .1 012 l 3 5 53.9 1`2.5 1`10.6 1`7.9 :1`d 1`0. C0.7 01.5 C3 4 C4.3 7 Cti. `, C7.5 08.2 C8 3 C6.6 CG.O .050.2 F _6 F 34.4 F36.6 F FSB.5 F36-1 F 2 3b,A F S 1-29.7 F2B 9 F28.F28.5 F25 F F31.6 1`35 FR. B 2-4 F40,5 F39.5 F39.5 40., f 1-3A.G F36.2 F F2B.2 5.1 F16.4 F12-0 .9 1`2.2 .2 `.2 GO,B 0.]4 1`i C'30j.9 015 :S Cl 3 =_.' I d'2.'S 0-2 F via 1 6.2 F1.0 0.3 C1.2 C3.3 C3.2 05.9 CL.. 06.3 C6=6 00.9 CID.$ CB. 6 .7:9 3.5 F .3 F35,5. F3B,5 1`38,3 F27,8 F 2 F36,2 "1.- 1`31.5 F30.7 F30.i F „ 1 317 2 .2 1`27. F31.8 F37.7 1`39,1 1`39.2 3.3 F40.4 F'39.4 F .9 1`36.0 F37,7 1`3 :7 F .5 F27.2 1`21.4 9.9 .4 F7-3 F2.4 C1.3 C5.: r.•'.`l 1119.6 019 •t I; 15,G C1,1 4 F3.1 F2.8 FO,6 Co 9 02.9 "3 3 F11,0 F2.B FO. C6.6 C1.9 [ 1 5 C5.6 1:4.:7 C4, 5 1,'5.1 08.0 G10 _ 2.6 1`14.6 26.' 1`38. 1`39,2 6.9 F38.6 F36.0 F37-4 -4. F32.7 F32 3 1`32-0 F .tl 1`32.1 FF29.4 F2fi .5 1`,5.8 F32.7 F=7.5 1`37,0 F37.0 F37-0 Ai.i F. r36.B F35.9 1`36 9.1 F35.9 1`29,5 1`2^c .0 15.6 G.2 F6,1 F3.4 .4 C5.0 2 0 FO d 01.1 0 C3.I G2 2 1=7,1 1`9 1`0.8 01.5 1:4,0 C"e. C13.2 C2.A C4.1 !_' -IA.il 1`]6.5 1`3 1`4 .1 Fdn.2 F40.2 1,39.8 38.0 F.36.3 F34.1 F33,6 1`33. 5.7 1`34- F30.7 F26.9 F24.0 1`2 .6 F27 9 F .9 1`33-0 F.33.3 F33.3 1`3' 4 1'35.9 F36.5 1`34. .3 F 1`35.2 F31.8 F24.8 F17.0 '11.13 .4 F4.F FU- C 5 F C CI 0 0.1 C,3.9 C3 0.7 / Ck. F9,4 F7.5 FO, .7 C3.2 0..3 C1- C1,5 0 1`16. F1B.F F .4 F .6 F41_ F41,1 F40.6 F40.0 F39.5 -3 F35 4 F35.E 1`34." .5 F35.S 1`33.0 F29. 1`24.9 1`22.1 2�a.2 0-6 1`27.5 F�'.9 1`2B.0 1`26,0 25.1 1`31.3 1`33.8 .9 1`35.1 1`33.5 1`3 1`92.3 1`28,3 t4.2 F7,0 FO •C" -� 019 5 '3 2 .4 09.2 0.1 7 „3.51 I;4 ti C3�6 C3.6 C2.g F 1`.G F,. 0.7 U 0.:::'.0 C' 4 1,0,1 15. 1`2 1 F22 9.1 43,2 Fd2.9 1`42.5 F49� 1`40.7 1`3 -i'6�5 F33.5 F36.6 F39 37.6 5 F34 F31.3 F27 -1 24,c^ 1`28 3 30.2 F28,1 1`24.7' F29,9 1`'0. 1 2 Fie,I F22.B 3 1`34.7 F34.6 F33.5 f34.3 1`29. 1`22-9 471 1`'7.2 01.1 2 =t9. C 7 01,3 Cl I C-2 CA 0 2.0 Cl:. '.5 03.3 ('2.8 1.1 F8.6 F• 1 - 0,4 FS9 F .5 F 3 41.3 44.5. a,9 F43.2 F42,6 F41 .6 1`4 "37.A F37 4 F37,0 F35, B 3 1W,1 136.0 F' B F29 5 28-1 F" 3 F26 B 4.9 F25 9 F22I F1B.5 F Fit,0 F11.0 FS F24, F30..7 F31,0 1`2. F F. 9 F ,B 1`7.6 ..9 C.1 5 01.7 (',1.11 C3 B C4 02,1 Ci 9 Cf .S 0.1 t 02.4 F2.7 F7.4 .9 F13,2 F21 Q F3-.0 FA1.7 'F45,3 F44.5" F44,0 3.7 F42.6 F .0 F= F36.2 F37.6 F36.5 F. 0 1`:16.1 F35,3 F34-5 1`30 9 -32 F 9 1 F27.0 F25 5 F22 7 0.2 F19.5 1 FB 0 1`5.3 F3. F" .2 1`17. F 7. 1`21.7 19,1 F .3 1`4. 4.8 L'. 03.2 Cd.3 0.4,' 0.2 3 CI -11 11.4 01,1 CO.B [0,1� 0.1.5. F6. Ft5,6 F20.4 .3.5 F 5.7 F4,0 F44.9 F44.3 F43-7 F43.2 .5 1`41.7 D. F3B.5 1`37.7 1`30.7 6. 1`36 0 1`35.3 1`32.2 1`:4. 1`30.5 1`27.4 25, 1`23.6 1`24,5 F1E'• 8 1`6 a F4,7 1`2.5 '4 1`4.3 1`9 '! 1`1 1`10 1`0.7 1`3. .. F. - 3ry O 0.0.- Cf .9 0.3 3 4,5 Cd ti 0:j.4 C4.A Cd 1 '.3 0.1.4 1`,9.:? (:1 0 00.7 CO. 1`3.5 1`13,4 1`11 4. F.-.1 1`3'.9 1`42. F44.4 1`43.9 1`43.5 1`43.3 1`43 1`42.5 F42 F36,d 1`37.7 136.5 1`35,0 F 7' 33.8 F 8 1`32.7 1`29.5 1`26.6 1`23-A 19. F -.1 1`8.6 1`5.`3 1`5.5 1`1.- 1`2,6 F2 .0 1`6.1 Flt. FO Ct !1 0.1 3 CS 0 cU.6 .0 1:4.3 C9.2 6 CO F1.9 F9-0 F]D=9 F.16.E1 8.4 F 2 40.5 F FA3,5 F43.5 F4 F43.D F42.5 F42,0 A F33.0 F36.0 F35.3 1`32.4 F3Q,2 2 1`30: F20,7 F25 0 5 1 F9,3 FG 5 F5.2 F2.4 .B .3 F6,I tj2 F0.9 Cq,4 1`0.2 .3 C4 .0 C2.3 fi7. 1`2.0 Fd.7. F7 8 F13.5 Ft7. F31. 1`32.2 -35.5 35,3 F o ] F43.2 F43,2 FA2.7 F42.1 41.5 FA0.3 .7 F31.2 F'29 2 F2fi 4 1`24. F 4 14.9 Fit.8 1`8.0 FR 7 1`3 'S FO 03.9 1:li.'! .1 CO.A C2.2 0.6 P3-9 1`1.4 F1516 F17.1 F35.5 F34.2 -32.9 39.0 43.3 F42, 1`42,2 1`41,5 F40.1 F39,6 7 8 3 F' -2A-3 F25 1 F24 2 F20,2 F17.1 F12 7 FB.6 CA 6.3 1`2.3 Cf.. C2.I C6,1 09.4 .150 F0. FO,4 F0.9 ?.?_ 1`3. '.0 F8.3 F10.7 F18, F14.9 F15.4 -iB. F28. F30. F 1 F -,5 F•12,3 F40.9 F4U.0 F" .4 F33,7 F31.5 F30. 5-6 F2Q,9 F29.2 F15.4 Ft0.6 F7 F F4.4 FO. C3.4 G7 C9.b dl.1 C3.'1 F0,6 F3.2 I F7.: Fit.4 F12.7 F13.6 14,8 F14,0 .3 "-8.6 -33. F39.' F40,7 Fall F35.5 F31.0 F30.I F ;4 1`26 d -'2- F1B.1 F15..1 F7.3 F2.9 8 C9.7 C5.91 C -0 CF,.4 ry00 C3.1 y>@ 1`0.6 F2.F F 1`3.3 F7. 12.2 F13.2 F1 8 F12,13 F 4 F, f F34.2 .1 F29.5 F20- F27,8 F22.0 FPO.3 FS 6 F15.A 11 7 F5.B F1 3 C2.A '3 7 C 0 C3. C1.5 F4.7 F1 7 F11.3 F11.. F8.9 F6. f22.4 .4 F21.p 2?- 3 25.3 F29.5 1`21.6 F15.7 F14. F13,9 F12'.1 1`9 1`5.2 FO - C:4.2 C .0 C2,2. CO.. F3,0 F7. F7,6 F7.1 4.6 F2.L FO. 1`9 F7 FS 2 25. F17,5 F12.1 F9.p F7 5 F5.4 F4.7 F2.6 1,3 CA. 0.5 F3.9 F2.7 1`.4 4:. C2.9 F7.5 Fl,_ .O F19.5 F12.1 .8 15.2 F2-2 F0. C �e .0 1, 2.0 02,9 .7 F4.0 1 2 F9.'. F6.3 F2.0 C2.0 C3.3 C2.0 CO 0.5 l_9 f"1,'.1 1`6.9 1y.6 F .3 1`0 3 C -2 0.'CO .. 0 LANDSCAPE/BERM AND FENCE TO PROVIDE BUFFER FROM BREA � r 4k: � � • CANYON ROAD EXISTING FLOOD CONTROLCHANNEL SECTION II t CA: e SECTION A -A SCALE 1 =20 , 'SITE D' ARK SITE OPEN SPACE PARK WITH BENCH GAZEBO AND PICNIC - PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN FACILITIES CITY OF DIAMOND BAR CALIFORNIA ' SCALE: 1" - 40'_0" SUMMERS//MURPHY & PARTNERS, INC. HOMES C � ARCHITECTS C S 34997 COAST HIGHWAY, SUITE 200 5 ENTERPRISE, SUITE 300, IRVINE, CA 92655 DANA POINT, CALIFORNIA 92629 (949) 443-9446 NORTH 0 40 80 120 160 DATE: 7131/2013 SNIP # PROJECT PROF/LES (VERTICAL & HORIZONTAL SCALE: V" 60') LEGEND VIEW PROFILE #1 VIEW PROFILE #4 ----- NATURAL GROUND DESIGN GROUND 2 PROPOSED GRADING PROJECT BOUNDARY LINE TOP OF SLOPE 840 800 760 720 680 640 u�V Summar 800 Soo- 760 7s 720 720 240 280 320 MSE WALL MSE A OSED PMSE OWAL POSED RETAINING WALL HEIGHT 31 NING WALL - a� P / 1 \ 800 660 CENTERLINE 1009 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK 5,140 DW PROPOSED WATER 640 � RETOA CLUSTER UNITS XISTIN :.z � 00 h O ENHANCED PAVEMENT p 5 PROPOSED SEWER OPOSE " a 8 ST. .PLAN 3 29 PROPOSED -SD- PROPOSED STORM DRAIN .,Lr v 6.0'- 720 5' RIK RETAINING WALL/ 4-PLEX 2 FIRE HYDRANT 40 ---- PROPOSED '16-18 SUBTOTAL 61 18 182 4,924 PR Lot 10 PROPOSED pl ml ADE - lO WON,' BLVD. MSE ALL P Pad + 7082- _- ;P.d=76 46 5,683 - - 0 . xisi 47 ----- EXI ---- TING G --- - ADE -z ad=757.. ---- "A" ST. Pad 60.0* 26 0' Pa =766.0' m P PROPOSED GRADE 4645 28 6,414 PRC POSED MSE WAI LPadI Lot 49 Lot 441 GR d=711 2 > N ¢ I N I� hm p PR POSED MSE W LL _ + Lot PROW "A"S ED . - Pad= + PROP 'A' ED T. ad=774. s Lot 2 ,- Lot 4 Lot 24 ____ ____ mi0i p ---_ km -- I ROPOS 11.N D PROPOSED MSE ALL _____!ROPOSFD ACCESS OND BAR PROPOSED AC __ ESS ---- PR P ACCESS ---- SED ---- ---- - - - =727.5 --- ------- ---- ---- -------------- ' BLVD. j ------ Lot 6 -- ---- ---- E EXISTING STING o_ ARK I XISTIN ---- ---- 1 1 ---------+ _ry2 C BREA N. RD. I BREA CY . CHANNEL i _ RAIN 'PARK ,,-- RDEN BASIN P - d-7083 Lot 1 PROP Pad- L 08.6- t 1 WALL Pad=7 Lot 7.8' Pad= L 07.4' 1 ISTINC GROUNDM P OPOSE RETAIN NG WA PR L POSED GRADE r: p m 40 RO 190 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680 720 760 800 840 880 920 960 1000 1040 1080 1120 7760 1200 1240 1280 7320 1360 7400 1440 1480 1520 1560 16 u�V Summar 800 Soo- 760 7s 720 720 u�V Summar N ¢ pPad--754A"ST. PLAN TYPE # OF BLDGS. p PROPOSED F' H' LOT LINE 240 280 320 MSE WALL MSE A OSED PMSE OWAL POSED RETAINING WALL HEIGHT 31 NING WALL - a� P / 1 \ 800 660 CENTERLINE 1009 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK 5,140 DW PROPOSED WATER 640 � RETOA CLUSTER UNITS XISTIN :.z � 00 h O ENHANCED PAVEMENT p 5 PROPOSED SEWER OPOSE " a 8 ST. .PLAN 3 29 PROPOSED -SD- PROPOSED STORM DRAIN .,Lr v 6.0'- 720 5' RIK RETAINING WALL/ 4-PLEX 2 FIRE HYDRANT 40 ---- PROPOSED '16-18 SUBTOTAL 61 18 182 4,924 PR Lot 10 PROPOSED pl ml ADE - lO WON,' BLVD. MSE ALL P Pad + 7082- _- ;P.d=76 46 5,683 - - 0 . xisi 47 ----- EXI ---- TING G --- - ADE -z ad=757.. ---- "A" ST. Pad 60.0* 26 0' Pa =766.0' m P ADO R. 4645 28 6,414 Si of Lot 1 1 4,763 Lot 49 Lot 441 GR d=711 u�V Summar N ¢ pPad--754A"ST. PLAN TYPE # OF BLDGS. p PROPOSED F' H' LOT LINE 240 280 320 MSE WALL MSE A OSED PMSE OWAL POSED RETAINING WALL HEIGHT 31 NING WALL - EASEMENT LINE P / 1 \ 800 660 CENTERLINE 1009 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK 5,140 DW PROPOSED WATER 640 � 4,857 CLUSTER UNITS XISTIN :.z � 00 Iq ENHANCED PAVEMENT 750 5 PROPOSED SEWER OPOSE " a 8 ST. .PLAN 3 29 PROPOSED -SD- PROPOSED STORM DRAIN .,Lr v 6.0'- 720 5' RIK RETAINING WALL/ 4-PLEX 2 FIRE HYDRANT / , n v 'r?r1 Ll Ala. 25DDI ' 60x70 LOT V/C/N/TY MAP .. 00 \\\ AO \ PROPOSED 8' / NOTES VIEW PROFILE #2 �p _ - - NATURAL ND PROPOSED GRADING A V A SIDEWALK , Boo- 760 - 680 00 _ _ _ \ \ \ F \ TO BE RELOCATED SINGLE FA MIL Y \ 7C EX. POWER POLE 760 Tz0 680 Summar N ¢ pPad--754A"ST. PLAN TYPE # OF BLDGS. p PROPOSED F' H' 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 PMSE OWAL POSED RETAINING WALL HEIGHT 31 PLAN 1 24 24 511 P / 1 \ SEWER DRAIN LOW PLOW MP -40 MEDIA FILTER 660 47 1009 SINGLE FAMILY 5,140 / DIVERSION STRUCTURE TREATMENT BMP 640 � 4,857 CLUSTER UNITS XISTIN :.z � 00 PLAN 1 18 I� lope a / , n v 'r?r1 Ll Ala. 25DDI ' 60x70 LOT V/C/N/TY MAP .. 00 \\\ AO \ PROPOSED 8' / NOTES VIEW PROFILE #2 �p _ - - NATURAL ND PROPOSED GRADING A V A SIDEWALK , Boo- 760 - 680 00 _ _ _ \ \ \ F \ TO BE RELOCATED SINGLE FA MIL Y \ 7C EX. POWER POLE 760 Tz0 680 � i 760 V A O EX R/W b' t06 'F? ' ' Al � v A A EX, CURB &� o � ,T, o PITCH• ry /� �PROPOSED CURB �m R m 2"erNL 720 \ \\ \ \ \ PROPOSED R/W go \ \ -EXISTING 8"" SEWER \ \ ` / 0 �X, SIGNAGE TO BE RELOC9TED ,� 1R5 \�\ RL 680 •,,\ o 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680 .720 760 800. 840 880. 920 960. 1000 1040 1080 1120 \� o - �• / Ps �`' \�` Y _r ) y n \\ CONNECT 70 EX. 10" ACP WATER 8�`�p' ^ / •.:.- 90 35 / 5 \ \\ m l r�r� l Alii. 32D i EXISTING 8 SEWER R \ $ 9 VIEW PROFILE #3 PROPOSED GRADING A'\`BP V-9 )y r' BaoNATURAL PROPOSED MEDIAN p O,` &., / 15 RrN 5 \ r \ �\ dJ IYJ-J JAM, J� ✓� �J 7'0 -58 ^ w 800" 760 720 680 Summar N ¢ pPad--754A"ST. PLAN TYPE # OF BLDGS. p PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY S.F 6 DETACHED 60X70 30 PMSE OWAL POSED 5,295 31 PLAN 1 24 24 511 P "A" ST 491 SUBTOTAL 47 1009 SINGLE FAMILY 5,140 34 _-------- 11 4,857 CLUSTER UNITS XISTIN :.z � 00 PLAN 1 18 I� lope a /r --------------------------------------- 16 OPOSE " a 8 ST. .PLAN 3 29 PROPOSED 401 SUBTOTAL Pad=7 6.0'- MULTI -FAMILY UNITS 39 4,462 4-PLEX 2 8 40 ---- Lots - '16-18 SUBTOTAL 61 18 182 4,924 PR Lot 10 PROPOSED 5,159 ADE - 5,022 WON,' BLVD. 5,347 of 29 ' Pad + 7082- _- 5,731 46 5,683 - - 0 . 5,419 47 ----- EXI ---- TING G --- - ADE -z - -- ---- - WALL 5,911 26 _ a 50 m 27 15 631 -- 4645 28 6,414 Si 5,160 Lot 1 1 4,763 � i 760 V A O EX R/W b' t06 'F? ' ' Al � v A A EX, CURB &� o � ,T, o PITCH• ry /� �PROPOSED CURB �m R m 2"erNL 720 \ \\ \ \ \ PROPOSED R/W go \ \ -EXISTING 8"" SEWER \ \ ` / 0 �X, SIGNAGE TO BE RELOC9TED ,� 1R5 \�\ RL 680 •,,\ o 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680 .720 760 800. 840 880. 920 960. 1000 1040 1080 1120 \� o - �• / Ps �`' \�` Y _r ) y n \\ CONNECT 70 EX. 10" ACP WATER 8�`�p' ^ / •.:.- 90 35 / 5 \ \\ m l r�r� l Alii. 32D i EXISTING 8 SEWER R \ $ 9 VIEW PROFILE #3 PROPOSED GRADING A'\`BP V-9 )y r' BaoNATURAL PROPOSED MEDIAN p O,` &., / 15 RrN 5 \ r \ �\ dJ IYJ-J JAM, J� ✓� �J 7'0 -58 ^ w 800" 760 720 680 840 <O\ Z '. S`p1PM Y,yps1 , `�\• o> > s 3y8'\ \ Nei EX SIGNAGE TO BE = �-1 gym\ To BE RELOCATED 800 lrStl\i:l AIL- 331411y o S a �R' � 0 „+ � AA• ROti I v PROPOSED SIGNAL .QW o y ® s N • 1V• ps11 o i� cn� CONNECT TO EXISTING R" 7s6 10" s _ r 1\5 20� s. '�\ \♦ r P' 6 o �kd ". pgRpONDP 1� i 720 v W 65 - .� St IRA \ w .. ps12 . r �l (y ps1395 \ ----R \p WSMt BUILDING SUMMARY Vo 30" LANDS P s 7 .^ 9 2 P 10 g No � Summar I of Areas PLAN TYPE # OF BLDGS. # OF UNITS X OF TOTAL SINGLE FAMILY S.F 6 DETACHED 60X70 30 5,127 CLUSTER UNITS 5,295 31 PLAN 1 24 24 511 PLAN 2 23 23 491 SUBTOTAL 47 1009 SINGLE FAMILY 5,140 34 CONDOMINIUMS 11 4,857 CLUSTER UNITS 4,235 12 PLAN 1 18 18 251 PLAN 2 26 16 351 .PLAN 3 29 PROPOSED 401 SUBTOTAL Pad=7 6.0'- MULTI -FAMILY UNITS 39 4,462 4-PLEX 2 8 40 6-PLEX 9 a oe OW SUBTOTAL 61 18 OTAL # OF UNITS 182 4,924 PR POSED 43 5,159 20 5,022 "A" ST 5,347 of 29 30 45 5,297 _- 5,731 46 5,683 23 5,419 47 4,169 EXIS ING DE 4,808 25 MS WALL 5,911 26 _ a 50 5466 27 15 631 -- 4645 28 6,414 Si 5,160 29 1 4,763 GR I� hm p Lot 9 - (STING __----- -- ____ ____ --- -- ---_ --- -- Lr 04 S DI OND BAR . - - P OPOSE pa =727.5 BLVD. j Pates 25' Pa =7220* "e" ST. 1 1 PROP SED RE AINING WALL P OPOSE RETAIN NG WA PR L POSED GRADE m 840 <O\ Z '. S`p1PM Y,yps1 , `�\• o> > s 3y8'\ \ Nei EX SIGNAGE TO BE = �-1 gym\ To BE RELOCATED 800 lrStl\i:l AIL- 331411y o S a �R' � 0 „+ � AA• ROti I v PROPOSED SIGNAL .QW o y ® s N • 1V• ps11 o i� cn� CONNECT TO EXISTING R" 7s6 10" s _ r 1\5 20� s. '�\ \♦ r P' 6 o �kd ". pgRpONDP 1� i 720 v W 65 - .� St IRA \ w .. ps12 . r �l (y ps1395 \ ----R \p WSMt BUILDING SUMMARY Vo 30" LANDS P s 7 .^ 9 2 P 10 g No � Summar I of Areas PLAN TYPE # OF BLDGS. # OF UNITS X OF TOTAL SINGLE FAMILY S.F 6 DETACHED 60X70 30 5,127 CLUSTER UNITS 5,295 31 PLAN 1 24 24 511 PLAN 2 23 23 491 SUBTOTAL 47 1009 SINGLE FAMILY 5,140 34 CONDOMINIUMS 11 4,857 CLUSTER UNITS 4,235 12 PLAN 1 18 18 251 PLAN 2 26 16 351 .PLAN 3 29 29 401 SUBTOTAL 73 1001 MULTI -FAMILY UNITS 39 4,462 4-PLEX 2 8 40 6-PLEX 9 54 4,682 SUBTOTAL 61 18 OTAL # OF UNITS 182 4,924 1. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 8714-002-900, 8714-002-901, 8714-002-902, 8714-002-903 AND 8714-015-901. 2 EXISTING & PROPOSED ZONING: SITE D SPECIFIC PLAN 3. EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT 4, PROPOSED LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL 5. EXISTING & PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN: SPECIFIC PLAN, SITE D. 6. ALL STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND GRADING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DIAMOND BAR STANDARDS, ORDINANCES AND APPROVED MODIFICATIONS HERETO. 7. ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD SHALL BE ACCOMMODATED ON THE FINAL DESIGN, OR THEY SHALL BE EITHER QUITCLAIMED, ABANDONED OR RELOCATED TO THE SATISFACTION OF ALL INTERESTED PARTIES. DRAINAGE AND PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS NECESSARY TO SERVE THIS PROJECT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AND WITH THE UTILITY PURVEYORS. EXISTING STORM DRAIN EASEMENTS WILL BE ABANDONED DURING THE FINAL MAP PROCEDURES. & MULTI FAMILY BUILDING TO MEET NFPA 13 STANDARDS. 9. ESTIMATED EARTHWORK QUANTITIES: 415,500 CYS. CUT, 415,500 CYS. FILL. 10. SEWER SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT. 11. PER LA COUNTY FIRM PANEL 1880 OF 2350. 12. PRIVATE WATER QUALITY BAI TO BE MAINTAINED BY H.O.A. 13. LOTS 62 & 63 ARE TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR & MAINTAINED BY THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. 14. ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG DIAMOND BAR BLVD, BREA CANYON RD AND % 680 1' I 1 I - -- -. �3 A • ` • \ , \ PASADO ON. TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. "} - o ao 86 120 Iso zoo zao zao szo sso aoo aao aao szo 560 soo 640 sao 72o Iso aoo aao aeo azo TOTAL GROSS 247,342 S.F. _ $96 \ Ps - " "� - sl ' '� 2' ps1 .+ \\ \ ` - -- EX SIGNAGE TO BE -o '•' N P \ E 5.7 A0. 15 ALL TRASH IS INDIVIDUAL PICK UP BY WASTE MANAGEMENT. TRASH PICK UP .FOR / .Q h o ^ 5-(R <cy \ \ ✓ \ wP 5 AVERAGE GROSS 5,263 S.F.' 6' _ 1 i0 BE RELOCATED ry m o o \/ _ 0 Bm"0 \ \ q00 \ o j6 MSE LOTS 2 THROUGH 5 NEEDS i0 BE LOCATED ON "B" STREET. TRASH PICK UP FOR ,/ `"' a, o m - ` p§. _ �• .� s1 9 s1 \ \ l ps1 LOT i WILL BE ALONG THE LOOP ALLEY. 6" a i.6" Y ) _ r r RIGHT -OF WAY TO 'i p /`^ • P - CF.IPER /PLA N 6" 12" 12" J TO l vlr!'T Jva -T6r�r%I ���fJJ / OW BE DEDICATED i E - \ \ \ `° ""� p p p4 \ \ CITY OF DI D BAR � • 60 � ps1 \ 1 W5' LOTS 1-5 TO BE MAPPED FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES. - o e ,� \ c 1 ,,, 165 ✓� m � \ � \ P ps1 \\ � r \ R-3' PER PLAN / o / EX, 12" ACP WATER �5 1h"�•;. • Ps1 o a �, s� 0 w - \ �; 1 65 ` \• ` pW 17 STORM DRAIN SYSTEM TO BE PRIVATE. AO y UT/L/TY AGENC/E o / e / R _, - , 26 1°1p1°6 a9% \ P L9 Ot \\ •\�♦ Ps1 °' \� g• BN•nP SCHOOL DISTRICT: POSTAL SERVICE: R=1/2" R=1/2" FL R= 112* / l � _ En BE TO BE \ �/ OW ` - ' 0 'I WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WALNUT VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT USPS _. EXISTING TREES 70 BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED PER TREE SURVEY. el • '' ^ PROPOSED MEDIA / - / P \ �. s 16p • \ ���. ,. \ ps1 P \ \ ,. \ 1 271 S. BREA CANYON ROAD 880 SOUTH LEMON AVE. 1317 SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BLVD. - = ,' 413.P. w \ 1g15 • \• 0' 5 w4[ \ \ \\ WALNUT, CA 91789 WALNUT, CA 91789 DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 • :' __�� P09 POLE ? h i '� 2 / ( ) ( ) " Ex o , t . 1` - P° 9• \ 909 595-7554 eoD 275-6777 LOT SUMMARY �o .. TO BE RELO .. 10p �QI ♦ 14$ \ \ ♦ •. 6 PROPOSED SIGNAL l MoOlFica TION AT / PPROPosED R Rw -_ y , o o �//�'- . `�s q6\\ 1 ,, \797 A�o. wP♦s1 \ cs I i\ /\ ��� 60 N� N� 6r5 \ •\ \ Y 2 5P \\ I1fDEpWONE SERVICE: TRASH: SINGLE FAMILY HOMES) SEWER SERVICE: TRUNK LINES Lot No. Land Use LdB ACtBB 24DIAMOND BAR BLVD. WASTE MANAGEMENT INC. LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT &BREA CANYON RD. 1400 PHILLIPS RANCH RD. 13940 E. LIVE OAK AVE. 1955 WORKMAN MILL ROAD LOT1 MULTI -FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO 62 3.3 ^ L� /y �p GUM - - - - LOTS 2-5 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDOS 73 5.9 4' ROLLED CURB k GUTTER 6 CURB & GUI ,C^ ` s _--- / m m W / e p •`\ \1 pot 53 / 11 \ N y 1� A (O )NA, - 91766 (800) 266-7551 (562) 699-7411 _ Ex. R w � ° � \\ BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 WHITTIER, CA 90507 ED 47 NTS NTS � _ \+� \\ '�t" o 2 . \ 0 1 g \\ 800 483-5000 - _" -EX CCURB _ .3' rt 121\\ „ 8 FK \ ` ` 5 \ \ P �• LOTS 6-52 SINGLE FAMILY DETACH 5 7 --- /` ,150 - \ I \ \ 118• `' 1'R' :.. p,1 3 " ELECTRIC SERVICE: (EOR REFERENCE ONLY) (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) EX. POWER POLE '� - - / --- " P \` s \y c�R� ' �' ^' �\ Ps 0 \' 1 ae 60 \ TRASH: (FOR MULTI -FAMILY) SEWER SERVICE: (MAIN LINES) LOT 53-57 SLOPES/OPEN SPACE 5.7 70 BE RELOCATED -� ^- "'-- - i `\ `\ 1\ ?\� P q % �-( 154 °>\ o\ \ o, ♦ 5 ps1 9• / -\ \ SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. VALLEY VISTA INC. LOS ANGELES COUNTY OF PUBLIC WORKS - --� -' rR \ • q � % RE��. � ps1 w se I � 5'<y'L 800 CIENEGA AVE, 13940E LIVE OAK AVE. SEWER MAINTENANCE DISTRICT LOT 58 PRIVATE STREETS 4.0 SAN DIMAS, CA V91773 1 BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 900 FREEMONT LOT // o $0 683 BE _^ ip' Z° \ �'ro P (800) 655-4555 00) 266-7551 ALHAMB A - 1 3�8 RIGHY-OF-WAVY 680 \- ps V1 �' �\ ". 1b0 ri LOT 62 6 RAIN AGARDEN PARK/BASIN 1 0�� / (8 RA C 01 p 4 1 �FMP-4o oRM DRAIN , \\ \ ps1 11 V-6 0 31 1 a o 1 0%` Rar r GAS SERVICE: 3' BE DEDICATED r THE / I 6 V - _�! 1 CABLE N: p p / µ1EDTA FILTER LOW FLOW , _ P 11 w. 1 w 11 ' \ 1 3 _ ✓ / 3' BROW IiY OF DI MOND BAR a / NREATMEN B P � 2/ SISION 10 s1�1 ' �<`'' Ps ` , " • ` 6� 1 Psj6 o m L r' ON H. TYP SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. TIME WARNER LOT 63 PARK 0.9 GARAGE __, - � P \� �- - \ � � I I `A`•- _ / 1919 S. STATE COLLEGE BLVD. 0, DOOR / r _ \ CTURE m .. 6 \ I o \ c / rr ryq, rr 1041 E ROUTE 66 RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATED TO 0.5 / \ \ \ - pyc� \ l X106 a - s is (800) 427-220006 �I 1 \v 1 S �c r� GLENDORA, CA 91740 TOTAL THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 182 29.9 �. 2% MIN 25 �-'----- :. ;t bc ,. _. \ l \. ,_. Q � 4 • s1 3 r� r' i�� s oti+ I \\ p rr BENCH MARK - a /. 4' 1'L 1140± _ P' •F'a, I f _ I 1 rr � '<�%`• / ' oA $ - - o <t ; � ; � '. 1 "' ` ps1 Ps ` m qc -' . I I I .5 /,? ,,,,0 2 I. r. LOS ANGELES COUNTY BENCHMARK NO. G 5073 ELEVATION: 726.809 DATUM: NAVD 88, Ex. CAL BUILDINGS 2005 ADJUSTMENT / 135 _ I I o \ ' ` 1 - i 3' TOE ) P/ SCALE. 1 "=50, D EX R W /i r • - ,. r, 740 - I / 00/ �. / ✓ ! ^ 'La r DESCRIPTION: EX POWER POLE / / yC�OP 0\N /,- / / . - '- / b F ..Et• � 1 � 2 s :� ps `n ' 'yo i r DITCH, TYP • TY /NGS �i` R, ' �. z9 R o 0' CURB DETAIL AND UTILITIES PR POgED CURB F �/ p _r� Q ? J y' �l LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TAG IN EAST CURB OF DIAMOND KITS TO BE RELOCATED / / -� / ;n p0 ' ��� / / ,' / � " l - I � - /� %f' G \ -- / , r; ;� _ SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDO MULTI FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO BAR BLVD. 42.7 FEET EAST OF CENTERLINE AND 95 FEET NORTH OF CENTERLINE OF PROPOSED R/W / 10 sl .: ' g0E`'� i g •O ° r (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) / / /. / h /. , > P _ _--. /.., Ps o. \ b r ,% 110.2 - 111.0 CROOKED CREEK DRIVE. / �. / _ > 12 ? PEDESTRIAN l l / � / ^ Of o1 / 0 � � ° a � , m''z 1 1 ,38 (SSWALK / ep � / / � ' r 29. g5, \ -. � � Xr 107.7 41.5' 28.0' 41.5' CURB n / �p / "� / �A' / W >22 , s / \ O / A' i _;G'. X10 �'' A� �l`\\* q', 1 N'k r.r / - , \ cuRo LEGAL DESCRIPTION ( / A 10.0' W 26' r' ' \ - /5, >o - 9' 6 AQV_. r -c _ , ' r/ v r, 32' BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 9 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO / / / ,r e a :! 2 CP 5 / / r '' - �'ss,1b'51. // , / / 90 ` , Try'v� � rrr MIN. MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, GOUTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Ypr� o\S,gA•r ^.� 5- A1�' ',%'rY�• r % ,,:.1psI/ r-> B � �/4 �/ gp,0A7b =,� vv v vL.. .�P3', , 4' r / r' .r 5.5' 317" o w I 5.5 94.5' 2 D 7 DEVELOPMENT S TANDARDS L 38.8' BROW ARK PER SITE D SPECIFIC PLAN 5 / - e 14 7.5' 75' GFRE TRUCK s / 5.5' 4 134.5' DEVELOPMENT STANDARD/LOWMEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL REQUIRED PROVIDEDTURNING RADIUS DETAIL 4 XISTING NDERGROUND 10.0' MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS 200 182 Al MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE 60% 41.9% TYPICAL �- z°• 0 , . I ro 5.5' - \I - - /> 1 , ',_-- - MINIMUM YARD SETBACKS: FRONT YARD 10 FEET 10 FEET tAr REAR YARD 15 FEET 88 FEET*OFF-STREET PARK/NG QNTS p ,v ' 0/ 75. SIDE YARD INTERIOR 10 FEET ONE 10 FEET * SIDE 5 OTHER CURB 12,2' SIDE YARD STREET 10 FEET STREET 10 FEET 5 / SIDE 5 ON OTHER 5 FEET wNEEL9'- SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED (60X70) r LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS 15% 6. 3' To STOP \� // ^^m°/ \ g0 / /' ,' ,3 00' ` / �� r OITCw TYP PRIVATE LANDSCAPED AREAS 15% OS r i 1.. - 16° r'' / s. Tr'7r1Cr l2 )r/-Jrr- / // /(w /�', VQ0�- `70 �•' ;`/ j � /� , SS II I II II1 ?.ts�. m -% �^o\ I _ � �_ �„ o /41 /_ ry ^^ti. • `r \O. ^` or r 3r \ P16 010- X8680. 0�' 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK � COMMON LANDSCAPED AREAS 4'4% 18.8' TOTAL LANDSCAPED AREAS 59% .os >r.r A10 jr160 PARKING SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED ExsnNc RESIDENT PARKING 94 2 ENCLOSED 94 ESM7 5.0' -4 I 0'5.0' 700 SPACES PER UNT) 5.0GUEST PARKING 32 (1 SPACE PER 3 185 5.REQUIRED RESIDENT SPACES) ROW PARKING SINGLE FAMILY TYPICAL STREET SECT/ONS , RE 11. 2' 19.Q' CONDO/MULTI-FAMILY. DITCH, TYR 70.0' 19.8' RESIDENT PARKING 270 1 ENCLOSED SPACE PER 270 r SERVICE RO/D AND A _> 9 - O rr r� CT No, 2{JF�{� PEDESTRIA)V ACCESS ONLY - 1 BEDROOM UNIT, 2 ENCLOSED ' l EMERGENCY INGRE55/CGRE55 _ SPACES PER UNITS WITH 2 w ggqq OR MORE BEDROOMS) � <; / � � � j � � 'rl TCH, TYP Fe 0`)" E �`L /U/ GUEST PARKING 90 (1 SPACE PER 3 "11 19 3' TOE DITCH, TYP ��� \-@" `� r s REQUIRED RESIDENT SPACES) y . w ` 'k �. A �� b� til` fz' EASEM Nr AJ --- -. - I \ 1. ? / 8' EASEMENT 2' 15.0' 2' TOTAL PARKING TVP/CAL ON STREET \ I \ / y iq, 1q•p• p• OS' EASEMENT D.5• 2' 12. e' 2' RESIDENT PARKING. 364 364 PARALLEL PARK/NG / ^a-. m` / os' os' 0.5 _ 0.5' NTS. GUEST PARKING. 122 296 � 3d' LANDSCAPE SETBACK v Pv �� / EMERGENCY 90 \ \ I ' ,`' 2'1 OP 7/ ,2 111 2 1 2111 CURB INGRESS/EGRESS ` \ / i6o % / / \ pK z, 4,pi z, » DEVIATION TO SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SETBACKS REQUIRED 1�1 fd' / \ Z` 0 �4.Y SWALE SWALE Z.1 1 'Na"Y E ¢ NORTHERLY CL SOUTHERLY \ `s' �y \\ AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM) R/w BERM ° R/W R/W R/W R/W 46' R/W R RIGHT-OF-WAY TO SECTION A -A ENTRY - PORTION OF "A" STREET (PRIVATE) SECTION B -B ENTRY - PORTION OF "A" STREET (PRIVATE) 50' 50' 8' 42' 4' 35' 8' i M DI IN I 3• 2,07 2.0% 6' CURB & GUTTER CURB 6" CURB & GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK SECTION L -L EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) WALL 54R/W 54' I BTDEDICATEDPFND BAR _ ' �� ,'- / SECTION 1-1 SECTION J -J SECTION K -K 23.0' 23.0' _ 27'0' 27'0' 27'0' 27'01 I/ o. k EMERGENCY ACCESS ROAD SERVICE ACCESS ROAD PEDESTRIAWSERWaACGESS ROAD 36'LOT 55 I 14.0' 26' 14.0' I ---�-- I / ' S' _ (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) IfA' 1A' S'I A. /r\\ '4- 10 IS 1 IS I IU 4 2' - 8' -- Br - 2' ♦- ,.", i /. PKWY PKWY Y 22 .,y 2� l��RKI p0 "55 SIDEWALK SIDEW QP v\ a• 32'31.75'SIDEWALK SIDEWALK 5 , I, J w wCURB & CURB & CURB �� ¢ GUTTER GUTTER t1 TETE" FL u FL FL cQi FL GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER 4' 28' 4' 3' 28' 19' 2.875' 26' 2.875' SECTION C -C SECTION D -D NOR STREET LOCA( STREET MIN. TRAVEL MIN. MIN. TRAVEL PARKING MIN. TRAVEL MIN. 'A' STREET - LOCAL STREET 'A' STREET • LOCAL STREET (TAPER) PARKING BOTH SIDES \, �$ ~D$ \ 1 PARKING BOTH SIDES NO PARKING (PRIVATE) 4" RourD D" cuee d" ROLLED 4" ROLLED 0' CURB CURB CURB 6"CURB CURB (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) r. ..� \ SECTION F -F SECTION G -G SECTION H -H 4 r � PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS R/W R/w 2' 11 I 50'54' I 42' 8' 4' 42' I 8.1 1 S MI I 1 2 ~ I oz z1 I cu K e R 6" CURB & GI/TIER' 8' SIDEWALK \-6" CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED 8" SIDEWALK -8" FOE ALK SECTION L -L PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) 50' 150' 35' 4' 45' M DIA I Mon m- 3 CURB -6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER - SECTION )I EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD (PUBLIC) r�PROPOSED w R/W RWROl4Yfd7S RW iib' I 5o' 60, 8' 1 1 8' 35' 4' 63 �1 3' M DIA, 1 _ _ MP% 201 2.0% 2'1 nmm CUR6 L PROPOSED 6" CURB & GUTTER RETAINING WALL 6 CURB & CUTTER 8' SIDEWALK 5' SIDEWALK SECTION M -M PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) 14" 35' MEgIAN 1/ 6" CDR:; URB fi CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 3' SIDEWALK SECTION N -N EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) PROPOSED RIPROYFIIENIS If►1 r�PROPOSED MPROWWMT9 R�106' R/W 50' 1 11 56' 156' 1 f 8' 42' 4' 1 41' 1 B'l 3' I MDII 3• LN I I Z.1 an1 2. 09, I I PROPOS! CURB L RETAININ 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER B' SIDEWALK PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK SECTION N -N PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD (PUBLIC) PRIVATE STREET PRNATF STREET TYPICAL PRIVATE DRIVE (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) AND FIRE LANE (PRIVATE) F � PROPOSED IMPROVEMEMS PEW 8 •. R/W T y 92' RI✓ 40' 40' 40' 1 52' 8' 32' 32' 8' 1 1 1 20% 201 20% mwww _ m_ WALL L 6" CURB & GDM°R 6' CURB & GU FR 6- CURB & GUTTER i 8 SIDEWALK '-EXISNNG'8" SIDEWALK 6" CURB &GUTTER SECTION 0-0 SECTION 0-0 EXISTING BREA CANYON ROAD PROPOSED BREA GANYON ROAD (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) DENSITY SUMMARY Summar I of Areas CONDO Lot No. S.F Lot No. S.F 6 7,867 30 5,127 7 5,295 31 6,674 8 4,945 32 6,329 9 4,928 33 5,346 10 5,140 34 4,408 11 4,857 35 4,235 12 4,761 36 4,227 13 7,033 37 4,230 14 4,902 38 4,232 15 4,646 39 4,462 16 4,328 40 4,652 17 4,682 41 4,715 18 7,473 42 4,924 19 6,095 43 5,159 20 5,022 44 5,347 21 5,214 45 5,297 22 5,731 46 5,683 23 5,419 47 4,169 24 7,196 48 4,808 25 4,577 49 5,911 26 5 214 50 5466 27 15 631 51 4645 28 6,414 Si 5,160 29 1 4,763 1. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 8714-002-900, 8714-002-901, 8714-002-902, 8714-002-903 AND 8714-015-901. 2 EXISTING & PROPOSED ZONING: SITE D SPECIFIC PLAN 3. EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT 4, PROPOSED LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL 5. EXISTING & PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN: SPECIFIC PLAN, SITE D. 6. ALL STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND GRADING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DIAMOND BAR STANDARDS, ORDINANCES AND APPROVED MODIFICATIONS HERETO. 7. ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD SHALL BE ACCOMMODATED ON THE FINAL DESIGN, OR THEY SHALL BE EITHER QUITCLAIMED, ABANDONED OR RELOCATED TO THE SATISFACTION OF ALL INTERESTED PARTIES. DRAINAGE AND PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS NECESSARY TO SERVE THIS PROJECT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AND WITH THE UTILITY PURVEYORS. EXISTING STORM DRAIN EASEMENTS WILL BE ABANDONED DURING THE FINAL MAP PROCEDURES. & MULTI FAMILY BUILDING TO MEET NFPA 13 STANDARDS. 9. ESTIMATED EARTHWORK QUANTITIES: 415,500 CYS. CUT, 415,500 CYS. FILL. 10. SEWER SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT. 11. PER LA COUNTY FIRM PANEL 1880 OF 2350. 12. PRIVATE WATER QUALITY BAI TO BE MAINTAINED BY H.O.A. 13. LOTS 62 & 63 ARE TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR & MAINTAINED BY THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. 14. ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG DIAMOND BAR BLVD, BREA CANYON RD AND % 680 1' I 1 I - -- -. �3 A • ` • \ , \ PASADO ON. TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. "} - o ao 86 120 Iso zoo zao zao szo sso aoo aao aao szo 560 soo 640 sao 72o Iso aoo aao aeo azo TOTAL GROSS 247,342 S.F. _ $96 \ Ps - " "� - sl ' '� 2' ps1 .+ \\ \ ` - -- EX SIGNAGE TO BE -o '•' N P \ E 5.7 A0. 15 ALL TRASH IS INDIVIDUAL PICK UP BY WASTE MANAGEMENT. TRASH PICK UP .FOR / .Q h o ^ 5-(R <cy \ \ ✓ \ wP 5 AVERAGE GROSS 5,263 S.F.' 6' _ 1 i0 BE RELOCATED ry m o o \/ _ 0 Bm"0 \ \ q00 \ o j6 MSE LOTS 2 THROUGH 5 NEEDS i0 BE LOCATED ON "B" STREET. TRASH PICK UP FOR ,/ `"' a, o m - ` p§. _ �• .� s1 9 s1 \ \ l ps1 LOT i WILL BE ALONG THE LOOP ALLEY. 6" a i.6" Y ) _ r r RIGHT -OF WAY TO 'i p /`^ • P - CF.IPER /PLA N 6" 12" 12" J TO l vlr!'T Jva -T6r�r%I ���fJJ / OW BE DEDICATED i E - \ \ \ `° ""� p p p4 \ \ CITY OF DI D BAR � • 60 � ps1 \ 1 W5' LOTS 1-5 TO BE MAPPED FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES. - o e ,� \ c 1 ,,, 165 ✓� m � \ � \ P ps1 \\ � r \ R-3' PER PLAN / o / EX, 12" ACP WATER �5 1h"�•;. • Ps1 o a �, s� 0 w - \ �; 1 65 ` \• ` pW 17 STORM DRAIN SYSTEM TO BE PRIVATE. AO y UT/L/TY AGENC/E o / e / R _, - , 26 1°1p1°6 a9% \ P L9 Ot \\ •\�♦ Ps1 °' \� g• BN•nP SCHOOL DISTRICT: POSTAL SERVICE: R=1/2" R=1/2" FL R= 112* / l � _ En BE TO BE \ �/ OW ` - ' 0 'I WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WALNUT VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT USPS _. EXISTING TREES 70 BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED PER TREE SURVEY. el • '' ^ PROPOSED MEDIA / - / P \ �. s 16p • \ ���. ,. \ ps1 P \ \ ,. \ 1 271 S. BREA CANYON ROAD 880 SOUTH LEMON AVE. 1317 SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BLVD. - = ,' 413.P. w \ 1g15 • \• 0' 5 w4[ \ \ \\ WALNUT, CA 91789 WALNUT, CA 91789 DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 • :' __�� P09 POLE ? h i '� 2 / ( ) ( ) " Ex o , t . 1` - P° 9• \ 909 595-7554 eoD 275-6777 LOT SUMMARY �o .. TO BE RELO .. 10p �QI ♦ 14$ \ \ ♦ •. 6 PROPOSED SIGNAL l MoOlFica TION AT / PPROPosED R Rw -_ y , o o �//�'- . `�s q6\\ 1 ,, \797 A�o. wP♦s1 \ cs I i\ /\ ��� 60 N� N� 6r5 \ •\ \ Y 2 5P \\ I1fDEpWONE SERVICE: TRASH: SINGLE FAMILY HOMES) SEWER SERVICE: TRUNK LINES Lot No. Land Use LdB ACtBB 24DIAMOND BAR BLVD. WASTE MANAGEMENT INC. LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT &BREA CANYON RD. 1400 PHILLIPS RANCH RD. 13940 E. LIVE OAK AVE. 1955 WORKMAN MILL ROAD LOT1 MULTI -FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO 62 3.3 ^ L� /y �p GUM - - - - LOTS 2-5 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDOS 73 5.9 4' ROLLED CURB k GUTTER 6 CURB & GUI ,C^ ` s _--- / m m W / e p •`\ \1 pot 53 / 11 \ N y 1� A (O )NA, - 91766 (800) 266-7551 (562) 699-7411 _ Ex. R w � ° � \\ BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 WHITTIER, CA 90507 ED 47 NTS NTS � _ \+� \\ '�t" o 2 . \ 0 1 g \\ 800 483-5000 - _" -EX CCURB _ .3' rt 121\\ „ 8 FK \ ` ` 5 \ \ P �• LOTS 6-52 SINGLE FAMILY DETACH 5 7 --- /` ,150 - \ I \ \ 118• `' 1'R' :.. p,1 3 " ELECTRIC SERVICE: (EOR REFERENCE ONLY) (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) EX. POWER POLE '� - - / --- " P \` s \y c�R� ' �' ^' �\ Ps 0 \' 1 ae 60 \ TRASH: (FOR MULTI -FAMILY) SEWER SERVICE: (MAIN LINES) LOT 53-57 SLOPES/OPEN SPACE 5.7 70 BE RELOCATED -� ^- "'-- - i `\ `\ 1\ ?\� P q % �-( 154 °>\ o\ \ o, ♦ 5 ps1 9• / -\ \ SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. VALLEY VISTA INC. LOS ANGELES COUNTY OF PUBLIC WORKS - --� -' rR \ • q � % RE��. � ps1 w se I � 5'<y'L 800 CIENEGA AVE, 13940E LIVE OAK AVE. SEWER MAINTENANCE DISTRICT LOT 58 PRIVATE STREETS 4.0 SAN DIMAS, CA V91773 1 BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 900 FREEMONT LOT // o $0 683 BE _^ ip' Z° \ �'ro P (800) 655-4555 00) 266-7551 ALHAMB A - 1 3�8 RIGHY-OF-WAVY 680 \- ps V1 �' �\ ". 1b0 ri LOT 62 6 RAIN AGARDEN PARK/BASIN 1 0�� / (8 RA C 01 p 4 1 �FMP-4o oRM DRAIN , \\ \ ps1 11 V-6 0 31 1 a o 1 0%` Rar r GAS SERVICE: 3' BE DEDICATED r THE / I 6 V - _�! 1 CABLE N: p p / µ1EDTA FILTER LOW FLOW , _ P 11 w. 1 w 11 ' \ 1 3 _ ✓ / 3' BROW IiY OF DI MOND BAR a / NREATMEN B P � 2/ SISION 10 s1�1 ' �<`'' Ps ` , " • ` 6� 1 Psj6 o m L r' ON H. TYP SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. TIME WARNER LOT 63 PARK 0.9 GARAGE __, - � P \� �- - \ � � I I `A`•- _ / 1919 S. STATE COLLEGE BLVD. 0, DOOR / r _ \ CTURE m .. 6 \ I o \ c / rr ryq, rr 1041 E ROUTE 66 RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATED TO 0.5 / \ \ \ - pyc� \ l X106 a - s is (800) 427-220006 �I 1 \v 1 S �c r� GLENDORA, CA 91740 TOTAL THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 182 29.9 �. 2% MIN 25 �-'----- :. ;t bc ,. _. \ l \. ,_. Q � 4 • s1 3 r� r' i�� s oti+ I \\ p rr BENCH MARK - a /. 4' 1'L 1140± _ P' •F'a, I f _ I 1 rr � '<�%`• / ' oA $ - - o <t ; � ; � '. 1 "' ` ps1 Ps ` m qc -' . I I I .5 /,? ,,,,0 2 I. r. LOS ANGELES COUNTY BENCHMARK NO. G 5073 ELEVATION: 726.809 DATUM: NAVD 88, Ex. CAL BUILDINGS 2005 ADJUSTMENT / 135 _ I I o \ ' ` 1 - i 3' TOE ) P/ SCALE. 1 "=50, D EX R W /i r • - ,. r, 740 - I / 00/ �. / ✓ ! ^ 'La r DESCRIPTION: EX POWER POLE / / yC�OP 0\N /,- / / . - '- / b F ..Et• � 1 � 2 s :� ps `n ' 'yo i r DITCH, TYP • TY /NGS �i` R, ' �. z9 R o 0' CURB DETAIL AND UTILITIES PR POgED CURB F �/ p _r� Q ? J y' �l LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TAG IN EAST CURB OF DIAMOND KITS TO BE RELOCATED / / -� / ;n p0 ' ��� / / ,' / � " l - I � - /� %f' G \ -- / , r; ;� _ SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDO MULTI FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO BAR BLVD. 42.7 FEET EAST OF CENTERLINE AND 95 FEET NORTH OF CENTERLINE OF PROPOSED R/W / 10 sl .: ' g0E`'� i g •O ° r (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) / / /. / h /. , > P _ _--. /.., Ps o. \ b r ,% 110.2 - 111.0 CROOKED CREEK DRIVE. / �. / _ > 12 ? PEDESTRIAN l l / � / ^ Of o1 / 0 � � ° a � , m''z 1 1 ,38 (SSWALK / ep � / / � ' r 29. g5, \ -. � � Xr 107.7 41.5' 28.0' 41.5' CURB n / �p / "� / �A' / W >22 , s / \ O / A' i _;G'. X10 �'' A� �l`\\* q', 1 N'k r.r / - , \ cuRo LEGAL DESCRIPTION ( / A 10.0' W 26' r' ' \ - /5, >o - 9' 6 AQV_. r -c _ , ' r/ v r, 32' BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 9 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO / / / ,r e a :! 2 CP 5 / / r '' - �'ss,1b'51. // , / / 90 ` , Try'v� � rrr MIN. MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, GOUTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Ypr� o\S,gA•r ^.� 5- A1�' ',%'rY�• r % ,,:.1psI/ r-> B � �/4 �/ gp,0A7b =,� vv v vL.. .�P3', , 4' r / r' .r 5.5' 317" o w I 5.5 94.5' 2 D 7 DEVELOPMENT S TANDARDS L 38.8' BROW ARK PER SITE D SPECIFIC PLAN 5 / - e 14 7.5' 75' GFRE TRUCK s / 5.5' 4 134.5' DEVELOPMENT STANDARD/LOWMEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL REQUIRED PROVIDEDTURNING RADIUS DETAIL 4 XISTING NDERGROUND 10.0' MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS 200 182 Al MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE 60% 41.9% TYPICAL �- z°• 0 , . I ro 5.5' - \I - - /> 1 , ',_-- - MINIMUM YARD SETBACKS: FRONT YARD 10 FEET 10 FEET tAr REAR YARD 15 FEET 88 FEET*OFF-STREET PARK/NG QNTS p ,v ' 0/ 75. SIDE YARD INTERIOR 10 FEET ONE 10 FEET * SIDE 5 OTHER CURB 12,2' SIDE YARD STREET 10 FEET STREET 10 FEET 5 / SIDE 5 ON OTHER 5 FEET wNEEL9'- SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED (60X70) r LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS 15% 6. 3' To STOP \� // ^^m°/ \ g0 / /' ,' ,3 00' ` / �� r OITCw TYP PRIVATE LANDSCAPED AREAS 15% OS r i 1.. - 16° r'' / s. Tr'7r1Cr l2 )r/-Jrr- / // /(w /�', VQ0�- `70 �•' ;`/ j � /� , SS II I II II1 ?.ts�. m -% �^o\ I _ � �_ �„ o /41 /_ ry ^^ti. • `r \O. ^` or r 3r \ P16 010- X8680. 0�' 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK � COMMON LANDSCAPED AREAS 4'4% 18.8' TOTAL LANDSCAPED AREAS 59% .os >r.r A10 jr160 PARKING SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED ExsnNc RESIDENT PARKING 94 2 ENCLOSED 94 ESM7 5.0' -4 I 0'5.0' 700 SPACES PER UNT) 5.0GUEST PARKING 32 (1 SPACE PER 3 185 5.REQUIRED RESIDENT SPACES) ROW PARKING SINGLE FAMILY TYPICAL STREET SECT/ONS , RE 11. 2' 19.Q' CONDO/MULTI-FAMILY. DITCH, TYR 70.0' 19.8' RESIDENT PARKING 270 1 ENCLOSED SPACE PER 270 r SERVICE RO/D AND A _> 9 - O rr r� CT No, 2{JF�{� PEDESTRIA)V ACCESS ONLY - 1 BEDROOM UNIT, 2 ENCLOSED ' l EMERGENCY INGRE55/CGRE55 _ SPACES PER UNITS WITH 2 w ggqq OR MORE BEDROOMS) � <; / � � � j � � 'rl TCH, TYP Fe 0`)" E �`L /U/ GUEST PARKING 90 (1 SPACE PER 3 "11 19 3' TOE DITCH, TYP ��� \-@" `� r s REQUIRED RESIDENT SPACES) y . w ` 'k �. A �� b� til` fz' EASEM Nr AJ --- -. - I \ 1. ? / 8' EASEMENT 2' 15.0' 2' TOTAL PARKING TVP/CAL ON STREET \ I \ / y iq, 1q•p• p• OS' EASEMENT D.5• 2' 12. e' 2' RESIDENT PARKING. 364 364 PARALLEL PARK/NG / ^a-. m` / os' os' 0.5 _ 0.5' NTS. GUEST PARKING. 122 296 � 3d' LANDSCAPE SETBACK v Pv �� / EMERGENCY 90 \ \ I ' ,`' 2'1 OP 7/ ,2 111 2 1 2111 CURB INGRESS/EGRESS ` \ / i6o % / / \ pK z, 4,pi z, » DEVIATION TO SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SETBACKS REQUIRED 1�1 fd' / \ Z` 0 �4.Y SWALE SWALE Z.1 1 'Na"Y E ¢ NORTHERLY CL SOUTHERLY \ `s' �y \\ AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM) R/w BERM ° R/W R/W R/W R/W 46' R/W R RIGHT-OF-WAY TO SECTION A -A ENTRY - PORTION OF "A" STREET (PRIVATE) SECTION B -B ENTRY - PORTION OF "A" STREET (PRIVATE) 50' 50' 8' 42' 4' 35' 8' i M DI IN I 3• 2,07 2.0% 6' CURB & GUTTER CURB 6" CURB & GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK SECTION L -L EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) WALL 54R/W 54' I BTDEDICATEDPFND BAR _ ' �� ,'- / SECTION 1-1 SECTION J -J SECTION K -K 23.0' 23.0' _ 27'0' 27'0' 27'0' 27'01 I/ o. k EMERGENCY ACCESS ROAD SERVICE ACCESS ROAD PEDESTRIAWSERWaACGESS ROAD 36'LOT 55 I 14.0' 26' 14.0' I ---�-- I / ' S' _ (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) IfA' 1A' S'I A. /r\\ '4- 10 IS 1 IS I IU 4 2' - 8' -- Br - 2' ♦- ,.", i /. PKWY PKWY Y 22 .,y 2� l��RKI p0 "55 SIDEWALK SIDEW QP v\ a• 32'31.75'SIDEWALK SIDEWALK 5 , I, J w wCURB & CURB & CURB �� ¢ GUTTER GUTTER t1 TETE" FL u FL FL cQi FL GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER 4' 28' 4' 3' 28' 19' 2.875' 26' 2.875' SECTION C -C SECTION D -D NOR STREET LOCA( STREET MIN. TRAVEL MIN. MIN. TRAVEL PARKING MIN. TRAVEL MIN. 'A' STREET - LOCAL STREET 'A' STREET • LOCAL STREET (TAPER) PARKING BOTH SIDES \, �$ ~D$ \ 1 PARKING BOTH SIDES NO PARKING (PRIVATE) 4" RourD D" cuee d" ROLLED 4" ROLLED 0' CURB CURB CURB 6"CURB CURB (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) r. ..� \ SECTION F -F SECTION G -G SECTION H -H 4 r � PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS R/W R/w 2' 11 I 50'54' I 42' 8' 4' 42' I 8.1 1 S MI I 1 2 ~ I oz z1 I cu K e R 6" CURB & GI/TIER' 8' SIDEWALK \-6" CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED 8" SIDEWALK -8" FOE ALK SECTION L -L PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) 50' 150' 35' 4' 45' M DIA I Mon m- 3 CURB -6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER - SECTION )I EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD (PUBLIC) r�PROPOSED w R/W RWROl4Yfd7S RW iib' I 5o' 60, 8' 1 1 8' 35' 4' 63 �1 3' M DIA, 1 _ _ MP% 201 2.0% 2'1 nmm CUR6 L PROPOSED 6" CURB & GUTTER RETAINING WALL 6 CURB & CUTTER 8' SIDEWALK 5' SIDEWALK SECTION M -M PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) 14" 35' MEgIAN 1/ 6" CDR:; URB fi CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 3' SIDEWALK SECTION N -N EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) PROPOSED RIPROYFIIENIS If►1 r�PROPOSED MPROWWMT9 R�106' R/W 50' 1 11 56' 156' 1 f 8' 42' 4' 1 41' 1 B'l 3' I MDII 3• LN I I Z.1 an1 2. 09, I I PROPOS! CURB L RETAININ 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER B' SIDEWALK PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK SECTION N -N PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD (PUBLIC) PRIVATE STREET PRNATF STREET TYPICAL PRIVATE DRIVE (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) AND FIRE LANE (PRIVATE) F � PROPOSED IMPROVEMEMS PEW 8 •. R/W T y 92' RI✓ 40' 40' 40' 1 52' 8' 32' 32' 8' 1 1 1 20% 201 20% mwww _ m_ WALL L 6" CURB & GDM°R 6' CURB & GU FR 6- CURB & GUTTER i 8 SIDEWALK '-EXISNNG'8" SIDEWALK 6" CURB &GUTTER SECTION 0-0 SECTION 0-0 EXISTING BREA CANYON ROAD PROPOSED BREA GANYON ROAD (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) DENSITY SUMMARY NUMBER OF UNITS MULTI -FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO NUMBER AREA OF UNITS DENSITY OF UNITS (ACRES) 57 (DUTACRO 62 3.3 1&8 DENSITY SUMMARY NUMBER OF UNITS SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED (60x70) NUMBER AREA DENSITY OF UNITS (ACRES) (DUiACRO 47 57 82 DENSITY SUMMARY NUMBER OF UNITS SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDO NUMBER AREA GUEST (V3 PER UNIT) DENSITY OF UNITS (ACRES) TOTALS 47 (DU/ACRE) 73 5.9 185 124 PARKING SUMMARY - SINGLE FAMILY NUMBER OF UNITS REQUIRED PROVIDED COVERED (2 PER UNFD GUEST (V3 PER UNIT) COVERED (2 PER UNIT) GUEST' TOTALS 47 94 32 94 185 INCLUDES ON -STREET PARKING AND 2 GUEST SPACES IN DRIVEWAY PARKING SUMMARY - MULTI -FAMILY NUMBER OF UNITS REQUIRED PROVIDED COVERED (2 PER UI GUEST (1/3 PER UNIT) COVERED (Z PER UNIT) GUEST TOTALS 135 270 90 270 105 MAP DATE IDENTIFIER MIC OF APAT CWNCE i THIS IMV 07/30/13 BY: LP Ms or T"s 01 09 19 Z 13 7.2213 FIRE AND PLANNING LP DATE REVISION BY DATE Jufy 22, 2013 FEET W.O. 0 30 60 120 GROSS AREA 29.7 AC. t 0 1/2 1 2 CONTOUR INTERVAL 5' INCHES TOTAL LOTS 63 PREPARED FOR. PREPARED BY - 0 1111111111 Y--0WNER T T LEN NAIR0 'X -A Im 25 ENTERPRISE \ ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656 v11r \i (949) 349-8100 Z Q HUNSAKER 6r. ASSOCIATES a I R V I N E I N C 1 I- ENONE RING - SURVEYING !n Three Hughs IMA CA WfiV FX (999) 5810]59 PH: (949) aflY1I11R SITE PLAN I VEST/NG TENTATIVE TRACT 72295 F:\0718\Planning\CA_Project\SITE PLAN\0718P_SITE PLAN. dwg PROJECT PROF/LES (VERTICAL & HORIZONTAL SCALE: I"=60') LEGEND VIEW PROFILE #1 VIEW PROFILE #4 PROJECT BOUNDARY LINE NATURAL GROUND DESIGN GROUND 2 PROPOSED GRADING 840 840 4 800 760 720 680 Fen 840 800 800- -760 760 720 LOT LINE OSED EASEMENT LINE NING WALL Lot No. Soo - CENTERLINE Lot No. DW PROPOSED WATER Acres s PROPOSED SEWER 760 0.181 30 —SD— PROPOSED STORM DRAIN PROPOSED GRADE 5,295 0.122 31 PR POSED SE WA L 0.114 32 �- 0.145 PRO N Q 0.113 33 + 0.123 p 5,140 0.118 QPR °C PROPOSE Nel N p I N Fi RETA PROPOSED 0.097 12 4,761 0.109 36 PROPOSED °C � 7,033 0.161 POSED MSE W LL 14 p _- + 4,232 PROPOSED A S. 15 "A" ST. Pad=7715* of 29 PROP "A" SED T ad=774. + Lot 2 40 4,652 XISTIN m� ,- Lot 4 41 TMSE'VALL Lot 24 PROPOSED + '11Z Z),�, m 1 Oi � 60.0* O Pa ]z I I P SADO PROPOSED MSE ALL 20 5,022 R P S ACCESS Lot 17 - PR AC -- -- SED ESS PR P ACC SED S ---- --__ + ING GR DE _ ,_______ - d=721. + 0.13 -- ----- -- -- - - -- _ - - ' 24 7,196 0.165 48 4,808 ----------- Lot 4,577 0.105 49 EXISTING CYN, RD. a Lots ARK i XISTIN REA CY .RAIN HANNE 0.125 _ PARK -' RDEN BASIN ---- �pl ----------------REA 28 Lot 9 ppl 5,160 IO -' 4,763 "B" ST. ISTING GROUND PROPOSED BADE - O Q I d=708.3 Lot 1 Pad- Lot 08.6* 1 A 11 Pad=7 Lot 7.8- Pad= Lo 07.4- 1 ---- ---- ---- _ _ , Lr S DI OND Pad 708.2* PROPOSED P =707.4 Pa =727.5 --- ---- ---- ---- 840 800 800- -760 760 720 8 0 LOT LINE OSED EASEMENT LINE NING WALL Lot No. Soo - CENTERLINE Lot No. DW PROPOSED WATER Acres s PROPOSED SEWER 760 0.181 30 —SD— PROPOSED STORM DRAIN 720 - 5' RTWL _ RETAINING WALL/ 5,295 0.122 31 6,674 0.153 8 4,945 0.114 32 �- 0.145 PRO N Q 0.113 33 p 0.123 p 5,140 0.118 P OPOSE PROPOSE 11 4,857 Pad=7 RETA PROPOSED 0.097 12 4,761 0.109 36 PROPOSED °C � 7,033 0.161 37 Np 14 p PROPOSED 38 4,232 0.097 15 "A" ST. SE WALL.1 of 29 30 0.102 16 lPad=762.02 "A" ST. 40 4,652 XISTIN m� I �O 41 TMSE'VALL ad=757. PROPOSED + "A" ST. Pad- 60.0* 4,924 Pa - + -766.0- LL P SADO R. 0.118 20 5,022 0.115 Lot 17 - 0.123 Lot 49 Lot 4 45 + ING GR DE _ ,_______ - d=721. + 0.13 23 �01 0.124 I 4,169 PROPOSEDLot 24 7,196 8 0 LOT LINE OSED EASEMENT LINE NING WALL Lot No. Soo - CENTERLINE Lot No. DW PROPOSED WATER Acres s PROPOSED SEWER 760 0.181 30 —SD— PROPOSED STORM DRAIN 720 - 5' RTWL _ RETAINING WALL/ 720 1 1 1 1RETAINING WALL HEIGHT 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 ,,—TOP OF SLOPE 680 \ R V -DITCH MSE WALL 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK CITY OF DIAMOND BAR -- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -- \ ♦; ' JJ ffl :. J J \JJJ JJ:J J 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680 720 760 800 840 880 920 960 1000 1040 1080 1120 1160 1200 1240 1280 1320 1360 1400 1440 1480 1520 1560 1600 \ A�°� PROPOSED 8' ENHANCED PAVEMENT VICINITY MAP VIEW PROFILE #2 PROPOSED GRADING � O � SIDEWALK NATURAL 800 800 \ \ EX. POWER POLE \ \ ' v TO BE RELOCATED >' / w ® NO TES 760 720 680 rR s \ AREA TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR - - \ 1. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 8714-002-900, 8714-002-901, 8714-002-902, Cut 8714 -002-903 AND 8714-015-001. 760 CUTIFILL LINE / \ s EX. R/W oh "'^ , ' 1oE T(P �" \ FIII 2. EXISTING & PROPOSED ZONING: SITE D SPECIFIC PLAN EX. CURB o \ \ PROPOSED CURB M M 2"Rr / �' 3. EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT PROPOSED R W i / \ � o � / � �'- o C u FIRE HYDRANT 720 EXISTING 8" SEWER \ \\ o' 4. PROPOSED LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL \\- V \ � ° EX SIGNAGE ,TO BE � � '� RT TO BE RELOCATED / �0 EES "X 1 SEWER DRAIN LOW PLOW 5. EXISTING & PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN: SPECIFIC PLAN, SITE D. 680 \ \ o''�!,- / ,1 cEs \ \I DIVERSION STRUCTURE • PG \ �\ T o / 6. ALL STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND GRADING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680 720 760 800 840 880 920 960 1000 1040 1080 1120 `, \:Z 26 & ��\� �v� _ r �^ 1, r WITH DIAMOND BAR STANDARDS, ORDINANCES AND APPROVED MODIFICATIONS HERETO. C> CONNECT TO EX, 10" ACP waTER / 0' / ��o X35 2A' / 5 ESM \` \\\ rr?r� r"r l\SCJ i��J,fl MP -40 MEDIA FILTER VIEW PROFILE #3 Z ,� EXISTING 8" SEWER / PR \ '� Q.1�' 13 ' \ }j\ J'� '_"1� ("� �r'�' (` �'J TREATMENT BMP 7. ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD SHALL BE ACCOMMODATED ON THE FINAL DESIGN, OR c� - / 8 2.s Rrwl \ \ \ 1���� 81 J .�5 50 r.J .� THEY SHALL BE EITHER QUITCLAIMED, ABANDONED OR RELOCATED TO THE - - - - - NATURAL GROUND PROPOSED GRADING NO � \ \ SATISFACTION OF ALL INTERESTED PARTIES DRAINAGE AND PUBLIC UTILITY goo PROPOSED MEDIAN \0 Q a / ^ �y \ \\ goo 760 720 6 NUMBER OF UNITS Summary of Areas PROVIDED COVERED (2 PER UNIT) Lot No. S.F Acres Lot No. S.F Acres 6 7,867 0.181 30 5,127 0.118 7 5,295 0.122 31 6,674 0.153 8 4,945 0.114 32 �- 0.145 9 N Q 0.113 33 5,346 0.123 10 5,140 0.118 P OPOSE PROPOSE 11 4,857 Pad=7 6.0+ PROPOSED 0.097 12 4,761 0.109 36 4,227 °C � 7,033 0.161 37 Np 14 p PROPOSED 38 4,232 0.097 15 "A" ST. SE WALL.1 of 29 30 0.102 16 4,328 "A" ST. 40 4,652 0.107 17 I 0.107 41 4,715 0.108 18 7,473 SE WALLa 4,924 0.113 NIC MIA LL 0.14 43 5,159 0.118 20 5,022 0.115 44 - 0.123 21 j O 45 + ING GR DE _ ,_______ - 46 5,683 0.13 23 �01 0.124 I 4,169 PROPOSEDLot 24 7,196 0.165 48 4,808 0.11 25 4,577 0.105 49 5,911 0.136 26 Lots 16-18 50 5,466 0.125 27 5,631 0.129 51 10 0.107 28 Lot 9 ppl 5,160 IO -' 4,763 "B" ST. PROPOSED BADE - Q I XISTIN A 11 ---- ---- ---- _ _ , Lr S DI OND Pad 708.2* PROPOSED P =707.4 Pa =727.5 --- ---- ---- ---- - BLVD. BLVD. -Pad=7,, a Pa =722.0* "B" ST. --------- Lot 2 Lor 1 Lot 4 m PROP SED RE AINING WALL EXISTING GRADE— P OPOSE RETAINING WAL rR s \ AREA TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR - - \ 1. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 8714-002-900, 8714-002-901, 8714-002-902, Cut 8714 -002-903 AND 8714-015-001. 760 CUTIFILL LINE / \ s EX. R/W oh "'^ , ' 1oE T(P �" \ FIII 2. EXISTING & PROPOSED ZONING: SITE D SPECIFIC PLAN EX. CURB o \ \ PROPOSED CURB M M 2"Rr / �' 3. EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT PROPOSED R W i / \ � o � / � �'- o C u FIRE HYDRANT 720 EXISTING 8" SEWER \ \\ o' 4. PROPOSED LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL \\- V \ � ° EX SIGNAGE ,TO BE � � '� RT TO BE RELOCATED / �0 EES "X 1 SEWER DRAIN LOW PLOW 5. EXISTING & PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN: SPECIFIC PLAN, SITE D. 680 \ \ o''�!,- / ,1 cEs \ \I DIVERSION STRUCTURE • PG \ �\ T o / 6. ALL STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND GRADING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680 720 760 800 840 880 920 960 1000 1040 1080 1120 `, \:Z 26 & ��\� �v� _ r �^ 1, r WITH DIAMOND BAR STANDARDS, ORDINANCES AND APPROVED MODIFICATIONS HERETO. C> CONNECT TO EX, 10" ACP waTER / 0' / ��o X35 2A' / 5 ESM \` \\\ rr?r� r"r l\SCJ i��J,fl MP -40 MEDIA FILTER VIEW PROFILE #3 Z ,� EXISTING 8" SEWER / PR \ '� Q.1�' 13 ' \ }j\ J'� '_"1� ("� �r'�' (` �'J TREATMENT BMP 7. ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD SHALL BE ACCOMMODATED ON THE FINAL DESIGN, OR c� - / 8 2.s Rrwl \ \ \ 1���� 81 J .�5 50 r.J .� THEY SHALL BE EITHER QUITCLAIMED, ABANDONED OR RELOCATED TO THE - - - - - NATURAL GROUND PROPOSED GRADING NO � \ \ SATISFACTION OF ALL INTERESTED PARTIES DRAINAGE AND PUBLIC UTILITY goo PROPOSED MEDIAN \0 Q a / ^ �y \ \\ goo 760 720 6 04a x Z �1 /� ^ / 3' .rwL - P260\\\\� \\ X139• \ \\ \ EASEMENTS NECESSARY TO SERVE THIS PROJECT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE S CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AND WITH THE UTILITY PURVEYORS. EXISTING STORM DRAIN EX SIGNAGE TO BE / h o/ \ ESM ' \\ `.\ \ \ � TO BE RELOCATED ���? - a5 s ° \\ \ w\� UTIL /T Y A GENC/ES EASEMENTS WILL BE ABANDONED DURING THE FINAL MAP PROCEDURES. goa F?11IIr id s.:lf- fll/ o ho ��5 V.Z� P \� 398 \\ 8. MULTI FAMILY BUILDING TO MEET NFPA 13 STANDARDS. . / o/ / 1 z1 1300 \ \�\ P,1 esti I \ WATER: TRASH: (SINGLE FAMILY HOMES) h o ' / Q% s 2 � / I WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WASTE MANAGEMENT INC. 9. ESTIMATED EARTHWORK QUANTITIES: 415,500 CYS. CUT 415,500 CYS. FILL. PROPOSED SIGNAL � ` / � � o � - \ o, 138• 1 271 S. BREA CANYON ROAD 13940 E. LIVE OAK AVE. Iso CONNECT TO EXISTING 2 �?' \ �' I o t`c WALNUT CA 91789 BALDWIN PARK CA 91706 10. SEWER SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION 10" ACP WATER 1 0 55 s �' o � � ^ •Z ' - Q'PGGE \� P 38.2 c�R- (909) 595-7554 (800) 266-7551 DISTRICT. FL �. \ I M G / ^ 5 \ SM �. =• 3 OSE RI 11. PER LA COUNTY FIRM PANEL 1880 OF 2350. 720 �/ s 2 v� \5 199 / ?'122 ` \ 1298 0 /kms L 5 go�NDP TELEPHONE SERVICE: TRASH: (FOR MULTI -FAMILY) ' � � \ N Q- � VERIZON VALLEY VISTA INC. \ ' \ s \ �` ✓' O`N � 5 I 12. PRIVATE WATER QUALITY BMP'S TO BE MAINTAINED BY H.O.A. / \\\ ;� 2 , / 139• ".' \\ WF�� 1400 PHILLIPS RANCH RD. 13940 E. LIVE OAK AVE. 30' LANDSG�4PE� 6� � � 22' 2 \ r- � = �' P' \ � o s� ,MSE TRE s I o �. P,1 G �2 P g8 f 5 2' �o R POMONA, CA 91766 BALDWIN PARK CA 91706 13 SETBA K. \ X55 ,12 N ��� \ P�0 LOTS 62 & 63 ARE TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR & MAINTAINED ,139• \o (800) 483-5000 (800) 266-7551 I., \ ` `j V \ \ BY THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. 90 SM �w N 60 \ \ 26, ��\ \ - ELECTRIC SERVICE: CABLE TV: a 40 so 120 160 200 240 280 320 iso 400 440 Oso 520 sso soo 640 sso 720 Iso soo 840 sao 920 o 816 ::.6.�: ::.: \ P,11 GESS �� ,122�g$ R / 2 • P,13 \ & SM-\. 14. ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG DIAMOND BAR BLVD, BREA CANYON RD AND / ,EX. SIGNAGE TO BE a o o ` 5 26 P0\\�\� P �REE�- \\ \ \\ SE Wpb I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. TIME WARNER PASADO DR. TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. TO BE RELOCATED \ o s 0, SMS » 5 _� \ \ X00 \ o \ \6 M 800 CIENEGA AVE. 1041 E. ROUTE 66 _ _ r --RIGHT-OF-WAY \ \ �`122� »� �136� \ \ �� P'1 — I _ SAN DIMAS, CA 91773 GLENDORA, CA 91740 1 ALL TRASH IS INDIVIDUAL PICK UP BY WASTE MANAGEMENT. TRASH PICK UP FOR Y/ TO i / a, \ P GE r-• 7 („ \ •� r - "� BE DEDICATED TO THE \ \ - ED ON B STREET TRASH PICK UP FOR S rr�r� � r � �� �:�JJI �0 o W 23' \ ' � �- 0% �' F �• 210 26' P ��\�\� �0 \ (800) 655 4555 LOTS 2 THROUGH 5 NEEDS TO BE LOCATED / CITY OF DIAMOND BAR �o rn �/ P,1 \ SSM\. \\\\ Q%1 ,1��' \ \ o POSTAL SERVICE: LOT 1 WILL BE ALONG THE LOOP ALLEY. a / o `�5 11 I ,1185 \ N 5 \ \ P \ \ GAS SERVICE: USPS EX. 12 ACP WATER o S 36 \ I \ "� 0 I}05 -! o Ow LOTS 1-5 TO BE MAPPED FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES. `' o P �`1 \ P' \ r - \ gR �yP SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. 1317 SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BLVD. 16. � 1 ,1 1 �j' / EX. Sic, cE To BE / / ,, \ 5, o� \\ P� GES o \\ 31p \'\ P _ �`'7. \ p\lGN' 1919 S. STATE COLLEGE BLVD. DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 PROPOSED MEDIAN, / TO BE REL OCA TED _ / / C • o '� \ 3 5 P 1 \ \ \ \ ( ) ' Z � \ � / X11 \ 2 ES\\- \ 6 6 MSF \ \ � �= • ' ANAHEIM, CA 92806 800 275-8777 17, STORM DRAIN SYSTEM TO BE PRIVATE. 1� (800) 427-2200 11 \\ 18. EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED PER TREE SURVEY. EX. POWER POLE \2 3 , / Q.°� o ,� P 0 \ \ \ 2 - \ o �3 5 q<<\ \ 11r SEWER SERVICE: (TRUNK LINES) i o 5\5 / '� �' Z \ \ ,131 \\ To BE RELocarED � - .� X00 0 � s 11� � � � � ` Q •' ' SCHOOL DISTRICT: LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT \ p 3 P' \-' \ 15 \ _ _ - 63' / - WALNUT VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPOSED SIGNAL �� -- _ - � P / � a• � •' ' 60 MODIFICATION AT 68x5 PROPOSED R Wi C° 11 .2 0 \ I 11 0 \ 2 \ J 7 \\ WHITTIER,1955 RCAA90607 N MILL ROAD DIAMOND BAR BLVD. 10 6" 1.6" &BREA CANYON RD. �- PROPOSED CURB r o \2 ti�� \\ P 2 C `� 20 `� I \\ \ P"\ 5 '12a 0 / X62 h 880 SOUTH LEMON AVE. LOT SUMMARY o \ �" N \ 0 \ �8 \\\ WALNUT, CA 91789 (562) 699-7411 C. F. PER PLAN 6" 12" 12" / ' 3811 .8 F PROPOSED SI - y P 112 6 0 1 0 3 0 1 R \ 6 0 11x 5 \ 12 I 3 , .. 188.5 J \\ I ; - \\ 3 0 0 /, 6 \\ O cE5 - =. i. o \ 2 \ \ o 60 188 o Lot No. Land Use Units Acres z a W 1 S 11 • o P' 0 s- P' \\ '° SEWER SERVICE: (MAIN LINES) TC 12"Iy S v EX�R/W rn rn n - ...:. ..... .: 3 1 1 \\ 26' P �S\\\� ° F ° \ \ \ \ P' 0 W. G �Q // I - 2a' �' P' 33 \\\ / �, LOS ANGELES COUNTY OF PUBLIC WORKS EX. CURB tr <r m 14 12 & N. 2 5 \ \ \ :Z • • 1 5 PER PLAN — _ o 12" c ,1 SS \\ sM 50' \ ' \ \ 1a 1 \\ SEWER MAINTENANCE DISTRICT LOT 1 MULTI -FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO 62 3.3 R-3 W •� _ o y ,�- P cE E $ a � I '� 1 �w� � �. R-1/2" - . a - � �_ EX. POWER POLE' _ _ rn - X112• n R'P� \ qR 60 •. � 6o Q 8 \ o 12" 1z"w �• - � 5 0 � � � N 900 FREEMONT R=1/2" -112"- TO BE RELOCATED N N / \\ \ 26 g v�M\. .2 \\ Q' Q i IIS 15 h o\ o\ \ oma\ 5 P�11g / Z 35 6\ 3j \ R 81 3 ^�`� ALHAMBRA, CA LOTS 2-5 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDOS 73 5.9 R-1/2" FL ��-� Q' �F \ 3 \ 1• . O ro o x �2f ,- �_ _:_'� ; - rrv/ii Q,1 \ � ,112• Q - 5-�R,! ` •... / -- _ :; ::::�: '- �� ° � o- � 0 1 00 C5o / LOTS 6-52 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED 47 5.7 • 80 165' ER goo �° k9 \ \\ \\ 0� ... 8 0 00 Ln / LOT 53-57 SLOPES/OPEN SPACE 5.7 ' 72 1 _ .. , . .. .., .. .. RIGHT-OF-WAY TO J� I 680 - �'Z Q �1 1 3 ° O`N /y" \ \ 26 PVA\' �tss�, \ I � \ � • R �$ � 6� 0/ � R32' / � 00 2 O 01 I MP 40 TORM DRAIN \ Q OAR 1 1 1 \ ^ 4' o. 3 1 • EXISTING EA SEMEN TS BE DEDICATED TO THE / , / o y06 ,113• '�� \ & c�M�• j . 15• n 6 0 0 �- �� / �� 3' BROW o ° / _ MEDIA FILTER $ LOW FLOW w �; Q- \ E 1 �o' \ , \ �c �� 6$ 186' % LOT 58 PRIVATE STREETS 4.0 R=1 <1" N CITY OF DIAMOND BAR TREATMENT BMP_ C°�' 081 _ T / " 6 ' \ \\� �s I ' P� / / DITCH, TYP • ,� ::::: / D/VERSION o � I '�s • • _ o \o CTURE 1 S5 o. Nj$ 60 %� / / /i' 2 EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED/SON COMPANY FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES LOT 59-61 PRIVATE DRIVEWAYS 0.1 ,18 O O __ -- _ TR Es I REG. FEBRUARY 8, 1954 /N BOOK 43774, PAGE 241, O.R. `�,; 6 �� \ \ „ LOT 62 RAIN GARDEN PARK/BASIN 3.8 4 ROLLED CURB & GUTTER 6 CURB & CUTTER ' / / // ' \ \ � � � �`' � P'1 Vo, o ®' f� � 3 � 2 1 I I I �i � l ,••' . � o_ 3 �I`� I � � - 3 EASEMENT TO GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, A CORPORATION 7 _< moo' � , /// ,/ �\ 79. �fi2 ,� �'� � ,111' S' ,116' . I � I / . •'• .•' /' S5 � // O NTS NTS //� / / / \ v / �\ 25' P' 113h \ Q'X18 ' �'� 19 I �� 7 0 /i \ FOR POLE LINES REC. APRIL 28, 1954 /N BOOK 44446, PAGE 33, O.R. LOT 63 PARK 0.9 (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) (FOR REFERENCE ONLY)PGG�Sw � P' I i � '160 /. > � ' °� % c, / ° 1 �s / I 71+35 I o / `�' �` / X1815 I \ Q -- / 6 EASEMENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR STORM DRAIN PURPOSES AS SHOWN ON TRACT No. 27577 REC. IN RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATED TO 0.5 TREE O- � O // O� / c9 //� � `�" � - ;' � 32� '^ o , . ? 110. �o � i� � 2 O 15• I �' a/ sem, ����p / / / / � � �o ,,o� F ;, ,• �� � ,112• ,1 \ �qY .• I . 8 'L I`- � i BK. 702, PGS. 22 TO 25 INCLUSIVE OF MAPS RECORDS LOS ANGELES COUNTY. THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR � / / �,• - / _ o� = ; �'; /� �P P \ ;f., 69' ' ..-'• I I I , 845 ,' s,. -mss a10 � IN � ' � � EX. - CURB ^� >o / 3' TOE 9 EASEMENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR WATER PIPE -LINES REG. AUGUST 31, 1960 AS INST. No. 3278, IN BK.; TOTAL 182 29.9 / EX. R/W ���'�� �� / / / /' / //Qri o� i °s, / 2 , / '�� 21118 ,113. I I \o / \ 0&\ / o j 2 `j1 'o / / DITCH, TYP- O I \ > 5 / 0 0962 PAGE 305, O.R. SURVEYORS NOTE: EASEMENT FOLLOWS THE CENTERLINE OF DIAMOND BAR BLVD., EX. POWER POLE x / \� / , - A ESS Q' P� 0 I O h ti 3' �` rc PGG ✓ R AND UTILITIES / PROPOSED CURB // ��p // / _/ - / > Qr /% 26 0�\�\� N R� l �9 �/ �b c� ! L IOJ.>9 \'�6 �l ' �� NO WIDTH IS GIVEN IN THE DOCUMENT. TO BE RELOCATED —1 / Orb / �� \0 4 M\• l l ^ d �1`' S5 S� GARAGE PROPOSED R/W / / / / ^ / / / , /r! ; > > ES 12 PEDESTRIAN l / �/ X18 6' /i / ° o DOOR / / / \ / / ^ 1 �0 2g. �_ �z ,11 ' �S -.,,t _ — K = 0 9 P o. li, - ^� , 1 7 EASEMENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR STREET PURPOSES AS SHOWN ON TRACT No. 25989 REG. IN BK. 714, BENCH MARK / / / O o\ / >o <b q� c P 1 '� g .Z ROSSWAL / l / 2 / �1 �5 c� 6» / ,x, / / 1 / 3 O UT CFS - Js • 12 L� "o �� Q%18 o d 29 �5 \ �i �`' / PGS 5 TO 7 OF MAPS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY. / O� > > >. GESS \ ,1 \ o / s �' �o / / O "�' / o / r^ Y/7Y S g , 2 PG SM N P 8 / 0 Kn- \ x > o LOS ANGELES COUNTY BENCHMARK N0. G 5073 ELEVATION: 726.809 DATUM: NAVD 88 �6, / / \6� S' S / .' gp.. , 2% MIN. EASEMENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR STORM DRAINS AND SANITARY SEWER AS SHOWN ON TRACT NO. 27577 2005 ADJUSTMENT / REC. IN BK. 702, PGS. 22 TO 25 INCLUSIVE OF MAPS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY. r' N o• � F \ \ `. • • ... .. � / C,Q ro h / � /'../ '� � ., ' ®_ o .-' � `-o 9<< 's- x / � i^ \ x 86� �,. /i .`� DESCRIPTION: EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN COUNT/ES GAS COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA FOR GAS PIPE LINES, LIGHT, POWER LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TAG IN EAST CURB OF DIAMOND T TREE 6 I / `� ' /y Ss R> row i P / , ,1 / P' o \ 3O i / / PURPOSES REC. FEBRUARY 17, 1964 REC. AS INST 3774, O.R. BAR BLVD. 42.7 FEET EAST OF CENTERLINE AND 95 FEET NORTH OF CENTERLINE OF ' \ /',� / h i FsM . \9' , ;�- �� (p / o4c'/ P J'I ' go / �� ° CROOKED CREEK DRIVE. / o / O`o� �,�' / � ` / / � � � _ � - •.-':- � �P,153• /'�/ � �,y� / 5 EASEMENT TO THE DIAMOND BAR WATER COMPANY FOR WATER PIPES REC. AUGUST 31, 1960 REG. IN BK. �Z / / h o / - / , / 20' 0' �- 6 / ' / / / / s-/' 6s' \ / i \ �° V o° 0-962, PAGE 305, O.R. AND REC. DATE.- AUGUST 10, 1964 AS /NST No. 3417, O.R. �0 675 / O� / - -'� / / iO LOT �' o / ��' / �O >9 / / s,.�j 1, R 15 15 , / o w� O / i �o , /� z9 d 7W[ ,18 /i $ SURVEYORS NOTE 0" CURB DETAIL -- - �p // / / /s, 8 O2 > r 0 P / , EASEMENT FOLLOWS THECENTERLINE OF DIAMOND BAR BLVD., NO WIDTH /S GIVEN NTS / �� L0�3 O / I ` /O , / / �/� >>2 o- / , s /'o • / c / 1 .I , / 2 �`� IN THE DOCUMENT. ` ARK O . �, ^ h .� / 3 5 g1' , 15 • / , r 6 , 2 / L 54 /, 3' BROW X25 (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) 3 ' O ' / / ♦ \ 8 , / Q' 1. , , ,1 I/ / Q �` ^> i DITCH, TYP 30 �O� / � /, � 1 a � � > � / � LEGAL DESCRIPTION ss � � ❑ EASEMENT TO THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FOR SANITARY SEWER PURPOSES REC. NOVEMBER 11, 1971 C � / � / .• / r 7 O• / .• .• � � . •�r i / o� " � Ac 1`O � 4 R� 10/I� / 0 / ,c / 6 3 Nl / / / / / > �, ♦/ / / `� 9- / c�/ , X18 O1°' // 35 AS INSL 3366, O.R.. BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 29 TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 9 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO E 4 : / 1 � -� \ - / � 10 > >/ 7 � /rr. / . • / 60 � / � / ®�\ 6 RTWL P �O L>' /j'\`°`L '� $ ° ^ O � 4 EXISTING / / / P / ri s� / p I}0 / , p \ �j �\ 3 / �/ a� �e> x MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, COUTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. \ / �L / h EASEMENT TO THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FOR STORM DRAIN INGRESS AND EGRESS REC, DATE. UNDERGROUND l / / / /ti /�' / he ..�` 0 �5 ,15 �' 115 / \ / / / a5 w / SURFACE FLOWS / / 1 I / �`� - / ��, p1 / / P / ,1 / 5 . ♦ �. 6 , r Q / a > �, A / �O i l / / ,� / / O / l �., ,1 / , /,� P �, 6 d \ S / p3 i go , ' P oL 1�o� Q / 01 / / ° \ 1 5 / / /� a �5 MAY 18, 1982 AS INST. 82-508759, O. R. 670 / ETRE a 7 2o ti 719 5 Q 5 P , s G� STATEMENT OF OWNERSHIP 26' o /'� v l 7 / • / ,�0 sem' ' `��G X169 �y� / Dr � v �� / /'� p a51.3 I --I 1 ^ / I �' ^O l \ P ; �� , Z \ /ij' �� '< 8�° X °° TREES 60X70 O L O T Q• I I ��--- �S, // 6 cPo ,15 s \ �(p G�4 / / \\ O, 4110", �F 9 F _ _ _ > C P P \ > ° I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED UNDER MY I \� / 8 �, O �\ \ L / X FESS rr`� / / ^ 3.1 ss / �, / > Og. / / 550 �`L c� �j2 �,> \\ �5_ _ //i c�GP \ / \ _ / SINGLE FAM/L Y SUPERVISION AND THAT THE OWNER OF RECORD HAS KNOWLEDGE Quo i0� - - J V I / \ <v <v / �1 / ,1 8 O \ cP co 1 0 \ �/ \ _ - - / 0 ( � � OF AND CONSENTS TO THE FILING OF THIS MAP. \ Dh > / \ /'�� Y' 1 Q O >> Q /. ,/ •� ,�0�%� 5 5 ,`c�� \ e oP' \�\ 2� /. / , \Q' / TREES \ �C. ti V� \ 'L) A+ % �j9,, 3 �`' o ' O -� / ° /•' / 5 \ �10 6 l , / x POOL \ / i `' \� �,, / P,155' Y `e j S PT ] �� ] 7S, ` \ \10 / \� I ` 690 -- /' ' / s 60 o. s / o� ^ ^ _ 18' DITCH; TY FIRE TRUCK 670. �, , / \ o �z o �� ��� �30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK Qq v II S , 2' / x / h� A P 155 P �16 / �`c�h ` ^ TURNING RADIUS DETAIL . 81.4 I 236: °' A r- / �••.- - r- NTS 7,,r ?A .. r ��, ��� -1 � o , �,�6, _ _ � , 7 8.05 � J N � O �6, / � � ^ cp0,, - - , , �} POOL , f .� --�8 I: P 3 �� �c , �� ° 6� �o s �.,, �h rr?r� (,r \J� EXISr�I \ ^°/ �• �. r ,.N /' I cn ,� SS ESMr \ �p `V ` , " \� '� ' �� ' w'. \ ' • '-- � S9' 6o P,155' �. ` `� ^ � \ �, �n 6°` O ♦ cP0_ ^ I /%, /760 // -F 682.1 \ I POOL 68. - \ - - \ -- - \ A \s // 16�• \ /� l/ / \ x o �S� o \ >Qo.. \ \ 6p w -' 21 ♦ / l ' i / ISO TYPICAL STREET SECTIONS- \ / I 685.7 hz., x Op 25 ^ 15 6 610 !i DI H, lYP r- r1r-+� SERVICE ROAD AND V - - ° �1P •z `^ ° �O 6 Q%1 /, a rr�r� r r\�� �:�J�3J PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ONLY - - 2 �� �• \ ,156 s Q \ f . 2 EMERGENCY R/W R/W o . \ \ \ !k - �� /, / TRE 85, /v INGRESS/EGRESS \ s 0 TREES 3.6P%158'TYP / 5' I 5 / \ x VARIES 8' 25' 14 26 S' 8' VARIES \ O/ �� 68° J c\ LANDSCAPE MEDIAN LANDSCAPE Q ` �� \ 3' TOE DITCH, TYP _ _ \ \ �6 ` moi' O soo.4 \ I cv \ 5 j ii x 12 EASEMENT \ 1 \ �^"� 21 \ rn �O` ,1 1' tw p`l it i / 8' EASEMENT `� / ~ I ^ \ .�$ i �' / 2' 14. 14.0' 2' 0,5' EASEMENT 0.5' 2' 12.0 2' 9'r 2.09 2.09 2.0% 2'\ � / � \ \ '•. - O� � `�'' / 2.0% ��, 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK �� S��P s �P\� i / 0.5' 0.5' EES 5 a S 4PX 5' SIDEWALK �5' SIDEWALK � � �� � � M 5 PARKWAY 6" CURB 5' PARKWAY - EMERGENCY $ \\ \ °- / / I 2 / �qX 2.0% 2 I 2 /� \ ` 1 z / INGRESS/EGRESS / �P� 2/ �P / 6" CURB &GUTTER 6" CURB &GUTTER 39 �- \ 1 4i \ A \ / 2' qI SWALE SWALE 2 X SECTION A -A \ \ `ro s� $ i �'/ 5 \\ Al' BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM NUMBER OF UNITS Summary of Areas PROVIDED COVERED (2 PER UNIT) Lot No. S.F Acres Lot No. S.F Acres 6 7,867 0.181 30 5,127 0.118 7 5,295 0.122 31 6,674 0.153 8 4,945 0.114 32 �- 0.145 9 4,928 0.113 33 5,346 0.123 10 5,140 0.118 34 4,408 PROPOSE 11 4,857 Pad=7 6.0+ 4,235 0.097 12 4,761 0.109 36 4,227 °C � 7,033 0.161 37 0.097 14 PROPOSED 0.113 38 4,232 0.097 15 "A" ST. 0.107 of 29 30 0.102 16 4,328 0.099 40 4,652 0.107 17 I 0.107 41 4,715 0.108 18 7,473 SE WALLa 4,924 0.113 =85.52 + 0.14 43 5,159 0.118 20 5,022 0.115 44 5,347 0.123 21 j O 45 EXIS ING GR DE 5,731 0.132 46 5,683 0.13 23 5,419 0.124 47 4,169 0.096 24 7,196 0.165 48 4,808 0.11 25 4,577 0.105 49 5,911 0.136 26 5,214 0.12 50 5,466 0.125 27 5,631 0.129 51 4,645 0.107 28 Lot 9 52 5,160 0.118 29 4,763 0.109 EXISTING Lr S DI OND BAR PROPOSED Pa =727.5 BLVD. -Pad=7,, a Pa =722.0* "B" ST. --------- ---I _t4 Lot 4 PROP SED RE AINING WALL P OPOSE RETAINING WAL PROPOSED GRADE m 04a x Z �1 /� ^ / 3' .rwL - P260\\\\� \\ X139• \ \\ \ EASEMENTS NECESSARY TO SERVE THIS PROJECT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE S CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AND WITH THE UTILITY PURVEYORS. EXISTING STORM DRAIN EX SIGNAGE TO BE / h o/ \ ESM ' \\ `.\ \ \ � TO BE RELOCATED ���? - a5 s ° \\ \ w\� UTIL /T Y A GENC/ES EASEMENTS WILL BE ABANDONED DURING THE FINAL MAP PROCEDURES. goa F?11IIr id s.:lf- fll/ o ho ��5 V.Z� P \� 398 \\ 8. MULTI FAMILY BUILDING TO MEET NFPA 13 STANDARDS. . / o/ / 1 z1 1300 \ \�\ P,1 esti I \ WATER: TRASH: (SINGLE FAMILY HOMES) h o ' / Q% s 2 � / I WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WASTE MANAGEMENT INC. 9. ESTIMATED EARTHWORK QUANTITIES: 415,500 CYS. CUT 415,500 CYS. FILL. PROPOSED SIGNAL � ` / � � o � - \ o, 138• 1 271 S. BREA CANYON ROAD 13940 E. LIVE OAK AVE. Iso CONNECT TO EXISTING 2 �?' \ �' I o t`c WALNUT CA 91789 BALDWIN PARK CA 91706 10. SEWER SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION 10" ACP WATER 1 0 55 s �' o � � ^ •Z ' - Q'PGGE \� P 38.2 c�R- (909) 595-7554 (800) 266-7551 DISTRICT. FL �. \ I M G / ^ 5 \ SM �. =• 3 OSE RI 11. PER LA COUNTY FIRM PANEL 1880 OF 2350. 720 �/ s 2 v� \5 199 / ?'122 ` \ 1298 0 /kms L 5 go�NDP TELEPHONE SERVICE: TRASH: (FOR MULTI -FAMILY) ' � � \ N Q- � VERIZON VALLEY VISTA INC. \ ' \ s \ �` ✓' O`N � 5 I 12. PRIVATE WATER QUALITY BMP'S TO BE MAINTAINED BY H.O.A. / \\\ ;� 2 , / 139• ".' \\ WF�� 1400 PHILLIPS RANCH RD. 13940 E. LIVE OAK AVE. 30' LANDSG�4PE� 6� � � 22' 2 \ r- � = �' P' \ � o s� ,MSE TRE s I o �. P,1 G �2 P g8 f 5 2' �o R POMONA, CA 91766 BALDWIN PARK CA 91706 13 SETBA K. \ X55 ,12 N ��� \ P�0 LOTS 62 & 63 ARE TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR & MAINTAINED ,139• \o (800) 483-5000 (800) 266-7551 I., \ ` `j V \ \ BY THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. 90 SM �w N 60 \ \ 26, ��\ \ - ELECTRIC SERVICE: CABLE TV: a 40 so 120 160 200 240 280 320 iso 400 440 Oso 520 sso soo 640 sso 720 Iso soo 840 sao 920 o 816 ::.6.�: ::.: \ P,11 GESS �� ,122�g$ R / 2 • P,13 \ & SM-\. 14. ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG DIAMOND BAR BLVD, BREA CANYON RD AND / ,EX. SIGNAGE TO BE a o o ` 5 26 P0\\�\� P �REE�- \\ \ \\ SE Wpb I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. TIME WARNER PASADO DR. TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. TO BE RELOCATED \ o s 0, SMS » 5 _� \ \ X00 \ o \ \6 M 800 CIENEGA AVE. 1041 E. ROUTE 66 _ _ r --RIGHT-OF-WAY \ \ �`122� »� �136� \ \ �� P'1 — I _ SAN DIMAS, CA 91773 GLENDORA, CA 91740 1 ALL TRASH IS INDIVIDUAL PICK UP BY WASTE MANAGEMENT. TRASH PICK UP FOR Y/ TO i / a, \ P GE r-• 7 („ \ •� r - "� BE DEDICATED TO THE \ \ - ED ON B STREET TRASH PICK UP FOR S rr�r� � r � �� �:�JJI �0 o W 23' \ ' � �- 0% �' F �• 210 26' P ��\�\� �0 \ (800) 655 4555 LOTS 2 THROUGH 5 NEEDS TO BE LOCATED / CITY OF DIAMOND BAR �o rn �/ P,1 \ SSM\. \\\\ Q%1 ,1��' \ \ o POSTAL SERVICE: LOT 1 WILL BE ALONG THE LOOP ALLEY. a / o `�5 11 I ,1185 \ N 5 \ \ P \ \ GAS SERVICE: USPS EX. 12 ACP WATER o S 36 \ I \ "� 0 I}05 -! o Ow LOTS 1-5 TO BE MAPPED FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES. `' o P �`1 \ P' \ r - \ gR �yP SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. 1317 SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BLVD. 16. � 1 ,1 1 �j' / EX. Sic, cE To BE / / ,, \ 5, o� \\ P� GES o \\ 31p \'\ P _ �`'7. \ p\lGN' 1919 S. STATE COLLEGE BLVD. DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 PROPOSED MEDIAN, / TO BE REL OCA TED _ / / C • o '� \ 3 5 P 1 \ \ \ \ ( ) ' Z � \ � / X11 \ 2 ES\\- \ 6 6 MSF \ \ � �= • ' ANAHEIM, CA 92806 800 275-8777 17, STORM DRAIN SYSTEM TO BE PRIVATE. 1� (800) 427-2200 11 \\ 18. EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED PER TREE SURVEY. EX. POWER POLE \2 3 , / Q.°� o ,� P 0 \ \ \ 2 - \ o �3 5 q<<\ \ 11r SEWER SERVICE: (TRUNK LINES) i o 5\5 / '� �' Z \ \ ,131 \\ To BE RELocarED � - .� X00 0 � s 11� � � � � ` Q •' ' SCHOOL DISTRICT: LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT \ p 3 P' \-' \ 15 \ _ _ - 63' / - WALNUT VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPOSED SIGNAL �� -- _ - � P / � a• � •' ' 60 MODIFICATION AT 68x5 PROPOSED R Wi C° 11 .2 0 \ I 11 0 \ 2 \ J 7 \\ WHITTIER,1955 RCAA90607 N MILL ROAD DIAMOND BAR BLVD. 10 6" 1.6" &BREA CANYON RD. �- PROPOSED CURB r o \2 ti�� \\ P 2 C `� 20 `� I \\ \ P"\ 5 '12a 0 / X62 h 880 SOUTH LEMON AVE. LOT SUMMARY o \ �" N \ 0 \ �8 \\\ WALNUT, CA 91789 (562) 699-7411 C. F. PER PLAN 6" 12" 12" / ' 3811 .8 F PROPOSED SI - y P 112 6 0 1 0 3 0 1 R \ 6 0 11x 5 \ 12 I 3 , .. 188.5 J \\ I ; - \\ 3 0 0 /, 6 \\ O cE5 - =. i. o \ 2 \ \ o 60 188 o Lot No. Land Use Units Acres z a W 1 S 11 • o P' 0 s- P' \\ '° SEWER SERVICE: (MAIN LINES) TC 12"Iy S v EX�R/W rn rn n - ...:. ..... .: 3 1 1 \\ 26' P �S\\\� ° F ° \ \ \ \ P' 0 W. G �Q // I - 2a' �' P' 33 \\\ / �, LOS ANGELES COUNTY OF PUBLIC WORKS EX. CURB tr <r m 14 12 & N. 2 5 \ \ \ :Z • • 1 5 PER PLAN — _ o 12" c ,1 SS \\ sM 50' \ ' \ \ 1a 1 \\ SEWER MAINTENANCE DISTRICT LOT 1 MULTI -FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO 62 3.3 R-3 W •� _ o y ,�- P cE E $ a � I '� 1 �w� � �. R-1/2" - . a - � �_ EX. POWER POLE' _ _ rn - X112• n R'P� \ qR 60 •. � 6o Q 8 \ o 12" 1z"w �• - � 5 0 � � � N 900 FREEMONT R=1/2" -112"- TO BE RELOCATED N N / \\ \ 26 g v�M\. .2 \\ Q' Q i IIS 15 h o\ o\ \ oma\ 5 P�11g / Z 35 6\ 3j \ R 81 3 ^�`� ALHAMBRA, CA LOTS 2-5 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDOS 73 5.9 R-1/2" FL ��-� Q' �F \ 3 \ 1• . O ro o x �2f ,- �_ _:_'� ; - rrv/ii Q,1 \ � ,112• Q - 5-�R,! ` •... / -- _ :; ::::�: '- �� ° � o- � 0 1 00 C5o / LOTS 6-52 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED 47 5.7 • 80 165' ER goo �° k9 \ \\ \\ 0� ... 8 0 00 Ln / LOT 53-57 SLOPES/OPEN SPACE 5.7 ' 72 1 _ .. , . .. .., .. .. RIGHT-OF-WAY TO J� I 680 - �'Z Q �1 1 3 ° O`N /y" \ \ 26 PVA\' �tss�, \ I � \ � • R �$ � 6� 0/ � R32' / � 00 2 O 01 I MP 40 TORM DRAIN \ Q OAR 1 1 1 \ ^ 4' o. 3 1 • EXISTING EA SEMEN TS BE DEDICATED TO THE / , / o y06 ,113• '�� \ & c�M�• j . 15• n 6 0 0 �- �� / �� 3' BROW o ° / _ MEDIA FILTER $ LOW FLOW w �; Q- \ E 1 �o' \ , \ �c �� 6$ 186' % LOT 58 PRIVATE STREETS 4.0 R=1 <1" N CITY OF DIAMOND BAR TREATMENT BMP_ C°�' 081 _ T / " 6 ' \ \\� �s I ' P� / / DITCH, TYP • ,� ::::: / D/VERSION o � I '�s • • _ o \o CTURE 1 S5 o. Nj$ 60 %� / / /i' 2 EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED/SON COMPANY FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES LOT 59-61 PRIVATE DRIVEWAYS 0.1 ,18 O O __ -- _ TR Es I REG. FEBRUARY 8, 1954 /N BOOK 43774, PAGE 241, O.R. `�,; 6 �� \ \ „ LOT 62 RAIN GARDEN PARK/BASIN 3.8 4 ROLLED CURB & GUTTER 6 CURB & CUTTER ' / / // ' \ \ � � � �`' � P'1 Vo, o ®' f� � 3 � 2 1 I I I �i � l ,••' . � o_ 3 �I`� I � � - 3 EASEMENT TO GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, A CORPORATION 7 _< moo' � , /// ,/ �\ 79. �fi2 ,� �'� � ,111' S' ,116' . I � I / . •'• .•' /' S5 � // O NTS NTS //� / / / \ v / �\ 25' P' 113h \ Q'X18 ' �'� 19 I �� 7 0 /i \ FOR POLE LINES REC. APRIL 28, 1954 /N BOOK 44446, PAGE 33, O.R. LOT 63 PARK 0.9 (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) (FOR REFERENCE ONLY)PGG�Sw � P' I i � '160 /. > � ' °� % c, / ° 1 �s / I 71+35 I o / `�' �` / X1815 I \ Q -- / 6 EASEMENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR STORM DRAIN PURPOSES AS SHOWN ON TRACT No. 27577 REC. IN RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATED TO 0.5 TREE O- � O // O� / c9 //� � `�" � - ;' � 32� '^ o , . ? 110. �o � i� � 2 O 15• I �' a/ sem, ����p / / / / � � �o ,,o� F ;, ,• �� � ,112• ,1 \ �qY .• I . 8 'L I`- � i BK. 702, PGS. 22 TO 25 INCLUSIVE OF MAPS RECORDS LOS ANGELES COUNTY. THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR � / / �,• - / _ o� = ; �'; /� �P P \ ;f., 69' ' ..-'• I I I , 845 ,' s,. -mss a10 � IN � ' � � EX. - CURB ^� >o / 3' TOE 9 EASEMENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR WATER PIPE -LINES REG. AUGUST 31, 1960 AS INST. No. 3278, IN BK.; TOTAL 182 29.9 / EX. R/W ���'�� �� / / / /' / //Qri o� i °s, / 2 , / '�� 21118 ,113. I I \o / \ 0&\ / o j 2 `j1 'o / / DITCH, TYP- O I \ > 5 / 0 0962 PAGE 305, O.R. SURVEYORS NOTE: EASEMENT FOLLOWS THE CENTERLINE OF DIAMOND BAR BLVD., EX. POWER POLE x / \� / , - A ESS Q' P� 0 I O h ti 3' �` rc PGG ✓ R AND UTILITIES / PROPOSED CURB // ��p // / _/ - / > Qr /% 26 0�\�\� N R� l �9 �/ �b c� ! L IOJ.>9 \'�6 �l ' �� NO WIDTH IS GIVEN IN THE DOCUMENT. TO BE RELOCATED —1 / Orb / �� \0 4 M\• l l ^ d �1`' S5 S� GARAGE PROPOSED R/W / / / / ^ / / / , /r! ; > > ES 12 PEDESTRIAN l / �/ X18 6' /i / ° o DOOR / / / \ / / ^ 1 �0 2g. �_ �z ,11 ' �S -.,,t _ — K = 0 9 P o. li, - ^� , 1 7 EASEMENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR STREET PURPOSES AS SHOWN ON TRACT No. 25989 REG. IN BK. 714, BENCH MARK / / / O o\ / >o <b q� c P 1 '� g .Z ROSSWAL / l / 2 / �1 �5 c� 6» / ,x, / / 1 / 3 O UT CFS - Js • 12 L� "o �� Q%18 o d 29 �5 \ �i �`' / PGS 5 TO 7 OF MAPS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY. / O� > > >. GESS \ ,1 \ o / s �' �o / / O "�' / o / r^ Y/7Y S g , 2 PG SM N P 8 / 0 Kn- \ x > o LOS ANGELES COUNTY BENCHMARK N0. G 5073 ELEVATION: 726.809 DATUM: NAVD 88 �6, / / \6� S' S / .' gp.. , 2% MIN. EASEMENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR STORM DRAINS AND SANITARY SEWER AS SHOWN ON TRACT NO. 27577 2005 ADJUSTMENT / REC. IN BK. 702, PGS. 22 TO 25 INCLUSIVE OF MAPS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY. r' N o• � F \ \ `. • • ... .. � / C,Q ro h / � /'../ '� � ., ' ®_ o .-' � `-o 9<< 's- x / � i^ \ x 86� �,. /i .`� DESCRIPTION: EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN COUNT/ES GAS COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA FOR GAS PIPE LINES, LIGHT, POWER LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TAG IN EAST CURB OF DIAMOND T TREE 6 I / `� ' /y Ss R> row i P / , ,1 / P' o \ 3O i / / PURPOSES REC. FEBRUARY 17, 1964 REC. AS INST 3774, O.R. BAR BLVD. 42.7 FEET EAST OF CENTERLINE AND 95 FEET NORTH OF CENTERLINE OF ' \ /',� / h i FsM . \9' , ;�- �� (p / o4c'/ P J'I ' go / �� ° CROOKED CREEK DRIVE. / o / O`o� �,�' / � ` / / � � � _ � - •.-':- � �P,153• /'�/ � �,y� / 5 EASEMENT TO THE DIAMOND BAR WATER COMPANY FOR WATER PIPES REC. AUGUST 31, 1960 REG. IN BK. �Z / / h o / - / , / 20' 0' �- 6 / ' / / / / s-/' 6s' \ / i \ �° V o° 0-962, PAGE 305, O.R. AND REC. DATE.- AUGUST 10, 1964 AS /NST No. 3417, O.R. �0 675 / O� / - -'� / / iO LOT �' o / ��' / �O >9 / / s,.�j 1, R 15 15 , / o w� O / i �o , /� z9 d 7W[ ,18 /i $ SURVEYORS NOTE 0" CURB DETAIL -- - �p // / / /s, 8 O2 > r 0 P / , EASEMENT FOLLOWS THECENTERLINE OF DIAMOND BAR BLVD., NO WIDTH /S GIVEN NTS / �� L0�3 O / I ` /O , / / �/� >>2 o- / , s /'o • / c / 1 .I , / 2 �`� IN THE DOCUMENT. ` ARK O . �, ^ h .� / 3 5 g1' , 15 • / , r 6 , 2 / L 54 /, 3' BROW X25 (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) 3 ' O ' / / ♦ \ 8 , / Q' 1. , , ,1 I/ / Q �` ^> i DITCH, TYP 30 �O� / � /, � 1 a � � > � / � LEGAL DESCRIPTION ss � � ❑ EASEMENT TO THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FOR SANITARY SEWER PURPOSES REC. NOVEMBER 11, 1971 C � / � / .• / r 7 O• / .• .• � � . •�r i / o� " � Ac 1`O � 4 R� 10/I� / 0 / ,c / 6 3 Nl / / / / / > �, ♦/ / / `� 9- / c�/ , X18 O1°' // 35 AS INSL 3366, O.R.. BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 29 TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 9 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO E 4 : / 1 � -� \ - / � 10 > >/ 7 � /rr. / . • / 60 � / � / ®�\ 6 RTWL P �O L>' /j'\`°`L '� $ ° ^ O � 4 EXISTING / / / P / ri s� / p I}0 / , p \ �j �\ 3 / �/ a� �e> x MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, COUTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. \ / �L / h EASEMENT TO THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FOR STORM DRAIN INGRESS AND EGRESS REC, DATE. UNDERGROUND l / / / /ti /�' / he ..�` 0 �5 ,15 �' 115 / \ / / / a5 w / SURFACE FLOWS / / 1 I / �`� - / ��, p1 / / P / ,1 / 5 . ♦ �. 6 , r Q / a > �, A / �O i l / / ,� / / O / l �., ,1 / , /,� P �, 6 d \ S / p3 i go , ' P oL 1�o� Q / 01 / / ° \ 1 5 / / /� a �5 MAY 18, 1982 AS INST. 82-508759, O. R. 670 / ETRE a 7 2o ti 719 5 Q 5 P , s G� STATEMENT OF OWNERSHIP 26' o /'� v l 7 / • / ,�0 sem' ' `��G X169 �y� / Dr � v �� / /'� p a51.3 I --I 1 ^ / I �' ^O l \ P ; �� , Z \ /ij' �� '< 8�° X °° TREES 60X70 O L O T Q• I I ��--- �S, // 6 cPo ,15 s \ �(p G�4 / / \\ O, 4110", �F 9 F _ _ _ > C P P \ > ° I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED UNDER MY I \� / 8 �, O �\ \ L / X FESS rr`� / / ^ 3.1 ss / �, / > Og. / / 550 �`L c� �j2 �,> \\ �5_ _ //i c�GP \ / \ _ / SINGLE FAM/L Y SUPERVISION AND THAT THE OWNER OF RECORD HAS KNOWLEDGE Quo i0� - - J V I / \ <v <v / �1 / ,1 8 O \ cP co 1 0 \ �/ \ _ - - / 0 ( � � OF AND CONSENTS TO THE FILING OF THIS MAP. \ Dh > / \ /'�� Y' 1 Q O >> Q /. ,/ •� ,�0�%� 5 5 ,`c�� \ e oP' \�\ 2� /. / , \Q' / TREES \ �C. ti V� \ 'L) A+ % �j9,, 3 �`' o ' O -� / ° /•' / 5 \ �10 6 l , / x POOL \ / i `' \� �,, / P,155' Y `e j S PT ] �� ] 7S, ` \ \10 / \� I ` 690 -- /' ' / s 60 o. s / o� ^ ^ _ 18' DITCH; TY FIRE TRUCK 670. �, , / \ o �z o �� ��� �30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK Qq v II S , 2' / x / h� A P 155 P �16 / �`c�h ` ^ TURNING RADIUS DETAIL . 81.4 I 236: °' A r- / �••.- - r- NTS 7,,r ?A .. r ��, ��� -1 � o , �,�6, _ _ � , 7 8.05 � J N � O �6, / � � ^ cp0,, - - , , �} POOL , f .� --�8 I: P 3 �� �c , �� ° 6� �o s �.,, �h rr?r� (,r \J� EXISr�I \ ^°/ �• �. r ,.N /' I cn ,� SS ESMr \ �p `V ` , " \� '� ' �� ' w'. \ ' • '-- � S9' 6o P,155' �. ` `� ^ � \ �, �n 6°` O ♦ cP0_ ^ I /%, /760 // -F 682.1 \ I POOL 68. - \ - - \ -- - \ A \s // 16�• \ /� l/ / \ x o �S� o \ >Qo.. \ \ 6p w -' 21 ♦ / l ' i / ISO TYPICAL STREET SECTIONS- \ / I 685.7 hz., x Op 25 ^ 15 6 610 !i DI H, lYP r- r1r-+� SERVICE ROAD AND V - - ° �1P •z `^ ° �O 6 Q%1 /, a rr�r� r r\�� �:�J�3J PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ONLY - - 2 �� �• \ ,156 s Q \ f . 2 EMERGENCY R/W R/W o . \ \ \ !k - �� /, / TRE 85, /v INGRESS/EGRESS \ s 0 TREES 3.6P%158'TYP / 5' I 5 / \ x VARIES 8' 25' 14 26 S' 8' VARIES \ O/ �� 68° J c\ LANDSCAPE MEDIAN LANDSCAPE Q ` �� \ 3' TOE DITCH, TYP _ _ \ \ �6 ` moi' O soo.4 \ I cv \ 5 j ii x 12 EASEMENT \ 1 \ �^"� 21 \ rn �O` ,1 1' tw p`l it i / 8' EASEMENT `� / ~ I ^ \ .�$ i �' / 2' 14. 14.0' 2' 0,5' EASEMENT 0.5' 2' 12.0 2' 9'r 2.09 2.09 2.0% 2'\ � / � \ \ '•. - O� � `�'' / 2.0% ��, 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK �� S��P s �P\� i / 0.5' 0.5' EES 5 a S 4PX 5' SIDEWALK �5' SIDEWALK � � �� � � M 5 PARKWAY 6" CURB 5' PARKWAY - EMERGENCY $ \\ \ °- / / I 2 / �qX 2.0% 2 I 2 /� \ ` 1 z / INGRESS/EGRESS / �P� 2/ �P / 6" CURB &GUTTER 6" CURB &GUTTER 39 �- \ 1 4i \ A \ / 2' qI SWALE SWALE 2 X SECTION A -A \ \ `ro s� $ i �'/ 5 \\ Al' BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM c� No. 59089 M DATE EDWARD A. MANDICH s�TFOFICA��F°��\P MAP DATE IDENTIFIER DATE Of LATEST CHANGE TO THIS MAP 07/30/13 BY: LP DATE OF THIS PLOT 09/19/13 1 NUMBER OF UNITS Summary of Areas PROVIDED COVERED (2 PER UNIT) Lot No. S.F Acres Lot No. S.F Acres 6 7,867 0.181 30 5,127 0.118 7 5,295 0.122 31 6,674 0.153 8 4,945 0.114 32 6,329 0.145 9 4,928 0.113 33 5,346 0.123 10 5,140 0.118 34 4,408 0.101 11 4,857 0.111 35 4,235 0.097 12 4,761 0.109 36 4,227 0.097 13 7,033 0.161 37 4,230 0.097 14 4,902 0.113 38 4,232 0.097 15 4,646 0.107 39 4,462 0.102 16 4,328 0.099 40 4,652 0.107 17 4,682 0.107 41 4,715 0.108 18 7,473 0.172 42 4,924 0.113 19 6,095 0.14 43 5,159 0.118 20 5,022 0.115 44 5,347 0.123 21 5,214 0.12 45 5,297 0.122 22 5,731 0.132 46 5,683 0.13 23 5,419 0.124 47 4,169 0.096 24 7,196 0.165 48 4,808 0.11 25 4,577 0.105 49 5,911 0.136 26 5,214 0.12 50 5,466 0.125 27 5,631 0.129 51 4,645 0.107 28 6,414 0.147 52 5,160 0.118 29 4,763 0.109 c� No. 59089 M DATE EDWARD A. MANDICH s�TFOFICA��F°��\P MAP DATE IDENTIFIER DATE Of LATEST CHANGE TO THIS MAP 07/30/13 BY: LP DATE OF THIS PLOT 09/19/13 1 721.1 r r i Y - R/I F "A" /IIEL/ R/W I R/W R/W I R/W NORTHERLY SOUTHERLY x RIGHT-OF-WAY TO �o �� �0� �� AC BERM TOTAL GROSS 247,342 S.F. ENTR PO ONO S R W \, 54' R/W 54' R/W / I R/W BE DEDICATED TO THE ;r:.::. i \� ��i S / — 5.7 Ac. July 30, 2013 (PRIVATE) 46' R/W \ CITY of DIAMOND BAR �j 75.4 SECTION I -I SECTION J J SECTION K -K DATE �22.4� ` � x � EMERGENCY ACCESS ROAD SERVICE ACCESS ROAD PEDESI MN/SERVICE ACCESS ROAD AVERAGE GROSS 5,263 S.F. W O 27.0 27.0' 27.0 27.0' \ % .i : - 1855-162AX R/W 84 , R/W 5 I 5 VARIES VARIES 8' 5' 20' 24' 20' 5' 8' 2' LANDSCAPE MEDIAN LANDSCAPE ?/ I r 1 ttPX ��r 2.09 2.09 2.0% 2.0% 2' 5' SIDEWALK/ `RETAINING WALL 6" CURB 5' SIDEWALK 5' PARKWAY 5' PARKWAY 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER SECTION B -B ENTRY - PORTION OF "A" STREET (PRIVATE) 50' 50' 8' 42' 4' 35' 1 3• L 09 Tr CURB � 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER- S' SIDEWALK SECTION L -L EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) 1 9.0' 36' 9.0'1 14' 5' 18' 18' 5' 4'I 2' P W 8, 8, KW 2' x P RKI RKI 2.1 M � 2 / 4LK � � SIDEWALK CURB & CURB & GUTTER GUTTER SECTION C -C "A" STREET - LOCAL STREET PARKING BOTH SIDES (PRIVATE) 1 14.0' 26' 14.0' 1 14' 10' 13' 13' 10' 4'1 2' PKWY PKWY 2' GUTTER GUTTER SECTION D -D "A" STREET - LOCAL STREET (`TAPER) NO PARKING (PRIVATE) r PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I R/W R/W R R/w R/W 112' I 00 50' 54' I 50' 1 50' I 8' 8' 42' 8' 4' 42' 8'I 18' 35' 4' 45' 811 I 1 I 3' 0% 2.09 1 2.0% 2.09 2.0% ?!Tm t 6" CURB & GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK/ CURB 6" CURB & GUTTER " PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK 6 CURB &GUTTER 6" CURB &GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK SECTION L -L SECTION M -M PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) 23.0 23.0 tivr%D IX l..Dl,D IX GUTTER SECTION E—E GUTTER "B" STREET - L�AL STREET PARKING BOTH SIDES (PRIVATE) x o. o<....:. LO 55 o / /\� 720.6 X 17 / \ ►' 720 Q 725.1^V + X +/ POOL S tA (- PROPOSED R/W 1 IMPROVEMENTS R/W 18 I 50, 1 60, 1 8' 8' 35' 4' 63' 1 1 3, 3' I X P 2.09 I 2.0% 2:1 M I CURB L � PROPOSED 6" CURB & GUTTER RETAINING WALL 6" CURB &GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK SECTION M -M PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) R/W 100 R/W 50' 50' 8' 35' 4 35' 8' I 2.09 2.0% 6" CURB 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK SECTION N -N EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) 0 3o FEET1zo 29.7 AC. ± GROSS AREA DENSITY SUMMARY CONTOUR INTERVALCkc 5 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED (60x70) ° 1/2 INCHES 2 TOTAL LOTS 63 0 W 35' 32' 31.75' NUMBER AREA DENSITY OF UNITS (ACRES) (DU/ACRE) Q Q Q Q Q Q ; 47 5.7 8.2 4' c� FL 28' 4' 3° c� FL 28 FL 19' 2.875' o FL 26' 2.875 MIN. TRAVEL MIN. MIN. TRAVEL PARKING MIN. TRAVEL IN. 20% 2.0% } 2.0% 4 R u 8) o" CURB 4" Ro URB 6" CURB 4 ROLLED0"o" cuRe DENSITY SUMMARY DENSITY SUMMARY SECTION F -F SECTION G -G SECTION H—H MULTI -FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDO PRIVATE STREET PRIVATE STREET TYPICAL PRIVATE DRIVE NUMBER AREA DENSITY NUMBER AREA DENSITY PREPARED FOR: PREPARED B Y: (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) AND RRE LANE OF UNITS (ACRES) (DU/ACRE) OF UNITS (ACRES) (DU/ACRE) (PRIVATE) 62 33 18.8 73 5.9 12.4 OWNER. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS �►I F- � PROPOSED F- � PROPOSED I I 1 IMPROVEMENTS 1 IMPROVEMENTS /W I 06 I I R/W R/W R/W R/W 92 I R/W 80 50' I 1 56' I 40' 40' 40' 1 52, 1 I 8' 42' I 4' I 41' 1 8' 3' 8' 32' 32' 8' 18' 32' 44' 1 8'1 MEDT N I 3' I 1 1 I I I I 1 I I \ MPX I I 2.0% 2' 2.0% 2.09 1 2.0% 2.09 2. D% PROPOSED CURB L RETAINING WALL 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER L 6" CURB & GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB &GUTTER EXISTING 8' SIDEWALK 8' SIDEWALK PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK SECTION N -N SECTION 0-0 SECTION 0-0 PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. EXISTING BREA GSW YON ROAD PROPOSED BREA CANYON ROAD (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) PARKING SUMMARY - SINGLE FAMILY NUMBER OF UNITS REQUIRED PROVIDED COVERED (2 PER UNIT) GUEST (1/3 PER UNIT) COVERED (2 PER UNIT) GUEST TOTALS 47 94 32 94 185 7.2213 FIRE AND PLANNING LP DATE REVISION BY 721.1 r r i Y - R/I F "A" /IIEL/ R/W I R/W R/W I R/W NORTHERLY SOUTHERLY x RIGHT-OF-WAY TO �o �� �0� �� AC BERM TOTAL GROSS 247,342 S.F. ENTR PO ONO S R W \, 54' R/W 54' R/W / I R/W BE DEDICATED TO THE ;r:.::. i \� ��i S / — 5.7 Ac. July 30, 2013 (PRIVATE) 46' R/W \ CITY of DIAMOND BAR �j 75.4 SECTION I -I SECTION J J SECTION K -K DATE �22.4� ` � x � EMERGENCY ACCESS ROAD SERVICE ACCESS ROAD PEDESI MN/SERVICE ACCESS ROAD AVERAGE GROSS 5,263 S.F. W O 27.0 27.0' 27.0 27.0' \ % .i : - 1855-162AX R/W 84 , R/W 5 I 5 VARIES VARIES 8' 5' 20' 24' 20' 5' 8' 2' LANDSCAPE MEDIAN LANDSCAPE ?/ I r 1 ttPX ��r 2.09 2.09 2.0% 2.0% 2' 5' SIDEWALK/ `RETAINING WALL 6" CURB 5' SIDEWALK 5' PARKWAY 5' PARKWAY 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER SECTION B -B ENTRY - PORTION OF "A" STREET (PRIVATE) 50' 50' 8' 42' 4' 35' 1 3• L 09 Tr CURB � 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER- S' SIDEWALK SECTION L -L EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) 1 9.0' 36' 9.0'1 14' 5' 18' 18' 5' 4'I 2' P W 8, 8, KW 2' x P RKI RKI 2.1 M � 2 / 4LK � � SIDEWALK CURB & CURB & GUTTER GUTTER SECTION C -C "A" STREET - LOCAL STREET PARKING BOTH SIDES (PRIVATE) 1 14.0' 26' 14.0' 1 14' 10' 13' 13' 10' 4'1 2' PKWY PKWY 2' GUTTER GUTTER SECTION D -D "A" STREET - LOCAL STREET (`TAPER) NO PARKING (PRIVATE) r PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I R/W R/W R R/w R/W 112' I 00 50' 54' I 50' 1 50' I 8' 8' 42' 8' 4' 42' 8'I 18' 35' 4' 45' 811 I 1 I 3' 0% 2.09 1 2.0% 2.09 2.0% ?!Tm t 6" CURB & GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK/ CURB 6" CURB & GUTTER " PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK 6 CURB &GUTTER 6" CURB &GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK SECTION L -L SECTION M -M PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) 23.0 23.0 tivr%D IX l..Dl,D IX GUTTER SECTION E—E GUTTER "B" STREET - L�AL STREET PARKING BOTH SIDES (PRIVATE) x o. o<....:. LO 55 o / /\� 720.6 X 17 / \ ►' 720 Q 725.1^V + X +/ POOL S tA (- PROPOSED R/W 1 IMPROVEMENTS R/W 18 I 50, 1 60, 1 8' 8' 35' 4' 63' 1 1 3, 3' I X P 2.09 I 2.0% 2:1 M I CURB L � PROPOSED 6" CURB & GUTTER RETAINING WALL 6" CURB &GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK SECTION M -M PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) R/W 100 R/W 50' 50' 8' 35' 4 35' 8' I 2.09 2.0% 6" CURB 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK SECTION N -N EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) 0 3o FEET1zo 29.7 AC. ± GROSS AREA DENSITY SUMMARY CONTOUR INTERVALCkc 5 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED (60x70) ° 1/2 INCHES 2 TOTAL LOTS 63 0 W 35' 32' 31.75' NUMBER AREA DENSITY OF UNITS (ACRES) (DU/ACRE) Q Q Q Q Q Q ; 47 5.7 8.2 4' c� FL 28' 4' 3° c� FL 28 FL 19' 2.875' o FL 26' 2.875 MIN. TRAVEL MIN. MIN. TRAVEL PARKING MIN. TRAVEL IN. 20% 2.0% } 2.0% 4 R u 8) o" CURB 4" Ro URB 6" CURB 4 ROLLED0"o" cuRe DENSITY SUMMARY DENSITY SUMMARY SECTION F -F SECTION G -G SECTION H—H MULTI -FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDO PRIVATE STREET PRIVATE STREET TYPICAL PRIVATE DRIVE NUMBER AREA DENSITY NUMBER AREA DENSITY PREPARED FOR: PREPARED B Y: (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) AND RRE LANE OF UNITS (ACRES) (DU/ACRE) OF UNITS (ACRES) (DU/ACRE) (PRIVATE) 62 33 18.8 73 5.9 12.4 OWNER. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS �►I F- � PROPOSED F- � PROPOSED I I 1 IMPROVEMENTS 1 IMPROVEMENTS /W I 06 I I R/W R/W R/W R/W 92 I R/W 80 50' I 1 56' I 40' 40' 40' 1 52, 1 I 8' 42' I 4' I 41' 1 8' 3' 8' 32' 32' 8' 18' 32' 44' 1 8'1 MEDT N I 3' I 1 1 I I I I 1 I I \ MPX I I 2.0% 2' 2.0% 2.09 1 2.0% 2.09 2. D% PROPOSED CURB L RETAINING WALL 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER L 6" CURB & GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB &GUTTER EXISTING 8' SIDEWALK 8' SIDEWALK PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK SECTION N -N SECTION 0-0 SECTION 0-0 PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. EXISTING BREA GSW YON ROAD PROPOSED BREA CANYON ROAD (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) PARKING SUMMARY - SINGLE FAMILY NUMBER OF UNITS REQUIRED PROVIDED COVERED (2 PER UNIT) GUEST (1/3 PER UNIT) COVERED (2 PER UNIT) GUEST TOTALS 47 94 32 94 185 * INCLUDES ON -STREET PARKING AND 2 GUEST SPACES IN DRIVEWAY PARKING SUMMARY - MULTI -FAMILY NUMBER OF UNITS REQUIRED PROVIDED COVERED (2 PER UNIT) GUEST (1/3 PER UNIT) COVERED (2 PER UNIT) GUEST TOTALS 135 270 90 270 105 LENNAR 0 25 ENTERPRISE ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656 (949) 349-8100 HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES I R V I N E , I N C . PLANNING ENGINEERING SURVEYING Three Hughes Irvine, CA 92618 FX: (949) 583-0759 PH: (949) 583-1010 WILLOW HEIGHTS VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 72295 F: \0718\Planning\OA-Project\TTM\0718P-TTM.dw s VINYL FENCE DETAIL m VINYL POST TOP RAIL TONGUE 4 GROOVE PANELS BOTTOM RAIL POSTS FI CKET5 FIN15H GRADE TUBULAR STEEL FENCE DETAIL SECTIO SCALE: I •ETE BLOCK =R FINISH TCH FECTURE GRADE GONGRETE FOOTING MASONRY WALL DETAIL ��MASONP'�BLOOK WALL DETAIL 19 / \ 17 \ 18 \ FENCE AND WALL PLAN FEET 0 30 60 120 0 1/2 1 2 INCHES PREPARED FOR.- OWNER: OR:OWNER: LENNAR a 25 ENTERPRISE ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656 (949) 349-8100 PREPARED BY.• IL j MI v DESIGN ROkj M GROUP 31591 Camino Capistrano San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 www.RJMdesigngroup.com [949] 493-2690 fax [949] 493-2600 phone WIL L 0 W HEIGH TS TEN TA T1 VE TRACT 1 1 I I I J I I I L 4001, A, A J ALI=�J VINYL FENCE DETAIL m VINYL POST TOP RAIL TONGUE 4 GROOVE PANELS BOTTOM RAIL POSTS FI CKET5 FIN15H GRADE TUBULAR STEEL FENCE DETAIL SECTIO SCALE: I •ETE BLOCK =R FINISH TCH FECTURE GRADE GONGRETE FOOTING MASONRY WALL DETAIL ��MASONP'�BLOOK WALL DETAIL 19 / \ 17 \ 18 \ FENCE AND WALL PLAN FEET 0 30 60 120 0 1/2 1 2 INCHES PREPARED FOR.- OWNER: OR:OWNER: LENNAR a 25 ENTERPRISE ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656 (949) 349-8100 PREPARED BY.• IL j MI v DESIGN ROkj M GROUP 31591 Camino Capistrano San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 www.RJMdesigngroup.com [949] 493-2690 fax [949] 493-2600 phone WIL L 0 W HEIGH TS TEN TA T1 VE TRACT 1 PROJECT PROF/LES (VERTICAL & HORIZONTAL SCALE: V" 60') LEGEND VIEW PROFILE #1 VIEW PROFILE #4 ----- NATURAL GROUND DESIGN GROUND 2 PROPOSED GRADING PROJECT BOUNDARY LINE TOP OF SLOPE 840 800 760 720 680 640 u�V Summar 800 Soo- 760 7s 720 720 240 280 320 MSE WALL MSE A OSED PMSE OWAL POSED RETAINING WALL HEIGHT 31 NING WALL - a� P / 1 \ 800 660 CENTERLINE 1009 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK 5,140 DW PROPOSED WATER 640 � RETOA CLUSTER UNITS XISTIN :.z � 00 h O ENHANCED PAVEMENT p 5 PROPOSED SEWER OPOSE " a 8 ST. .PLAN 3 29 PROPOSED -SD- PROPOSED STORM DRAIN .,Lr v 6.0'- 720 5' RIK RETAINING WALL/ 4-PLEX 2 FIRE HYDRANT 40 ---- PROPOSED '16-18 SUBTOTAL 61 18 182 4,924 PR Lot 10 PROPOSED pl ml ADE - lO WON,' BLVD. MSE ALL P Pad + 7082- _- ;P.d=76 46 5,683 - - 0 . xisi 47 ----- EXI ---- TING G --- - ADE -z ad=757.. ---- "A" ST. Pad 60.0* 26 0' Pa =766.0' m P PROPOSED GRADE 4645 28 6,414 PRC POSED MSE WAI LPadI Lot 49 Lot 441 GR d=711 2 > N ¢ I N I� hm p PR POSED MSE W LL _ + Lot PROW "A"S ED . - Pad= + PROP 'A' ED T. ad=774. s Lot 2 ,- Lot 4 Lot 24 ____ ____ mi0i p ---_ km -- I ROPOS 11.N D PROPOSED MSE ALL _____!ROPOSFD ACCESS OND BAR PROPOSED AC __ ESS ---- PR P ACCESS ---- SED ---- ---- - - - =727.5 --- ------- ---- ---- -------------- ' BLVD. j ------ Lot 6 -- ---- ---- E EXISTING STING o_ ARK I XISTIN ---- ---- 1 1 ---------+ _ry2 C BREA N. RD. I BREA CY . CHANNEL i _ RAIN 'PARK ,,-- RDEN BASIN P - d-7083 Lot 1 PROP Pad- L 08.6- t 1 WALL Pad=7 Lot 7.8' Pad= L 07.4' 1 ISTINC GROUNDM P OPOSE RETAIN NG WA PR L POSED GRADE r: p m 40 RO 190 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680 720 760 800 840 880 920 960 1000 1040 1080 1120 7760 1200 1240 1280 7320 1360 7400 1440 1480 1520 1560 16 u�V Summar 800 Soo- 760 7s 720 720 u�V Summar N ¢ pPad--754A"ST. PLAN TYPE # OF BLDGS. p PROPOSED F' H' LOT LINE 240 280 320 MSE WALL MSE A OSED PMSE OWAL POSED RETAINING WALL HEIGHT 31 NING WALL - a� P / 1 \ 800 660 CENTERLINE 1009 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK 5,140 DW PROPOSED WATER 640 � RETOA CLUSTER UNITS XISTIN :.z � 00 h O ENHANCED PAVEMENT p 5 PROPOSED SEWER OPOSE " a 8 ST. .PLAN 3 29 PROPOSED -SD- PROPOSED STORM DRAIN .,Lr v 6.0'- 720 5' RIK RETAINING WALL/ 4-PLEX 2 FIRE HYDRANT 40 ---- PROPOSED '16-18 SUBTOTAL 61 18 182 4,924 PR Lot 10 PROPOSED pl ml ADE - lO WON,' BLVD. MSE ALL P Pad + 7082- _- ;P.d=76 46 5,683 - - 0 . xisi 47 ----- EXI ---- TING G --- - ADE -z ad=757.. ---- "A" ST. Pad 60.0* 26 0' Pa =766.0' m P ADO R. 4645 28 6,414 Si of Lot 1 1 4,763 Lot 49 Lot 441 GR d=711 u�V Summar N ¢ pPad--754A"ST. PLAN TYPE # OF BLDGS. p PROPOSED F' H' LOT LINE 240 280 320 MSE WALL MSE A OSED PMSE OWAL POSED RETAINING WALL HEIGHT 31 NING WALL - EASEMENT LINE P / 1 \ 800 660 CENTERLINE 1009 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK 5,140 DW PROPOSED WATER 640 � 4,857 CLUSTER UNITS XISTIN :.z � 00 Iq ENHANCED PAVEMENT 750 5 PROPOSED SEWER OPOSE " a 8 ST. .PLAN 3 29 PROPOSED -SD- PROPOSED STORM DRAIN .,Lr v 6.0'- 720 5' RIK RETAINING WALL/ 4-PLEX 2 FIRE HYDRANT / , n v 'r?r1 Ll Ala. 25DDI ' 60x70 LOT V/C/N/TY MAP .. 00 \\\ AO \ PROPOSED 8' / NOTES VIEW PROFILE #2 �p _ - - NATURAL ND PROPOSED GRADING A V A SIDEWALK , Boo- 760 - 680 00 _ _ _ \ \ \ F \ TO BE RELOCATED SINGLE FA MIL Y \ 7C EX. POWER POLE 760 Tz0 680 Summar N ¢ pPad--754A"ST. PLAN TYPE # OF BLDGS. p PROPOSED F' H' 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 PMSE OWAL POSED RETAINING WALL HEIGHT 31 PLAN 1 24 24 511 P / 1 \ SEWER DRAIN LOW PLOW MP -40 MEDIA FILTER 660 47 1009 SINGLE FAMILY 5,140 / DIVERSION STRUCTURE TREATMENT BMP 640 � 4,857 CLUSTER UNITS XISTIN :.z � 00 PLAN 1 18 I� lope a / , n v 'r?r1 Ll Ala. 25DDI ' 60x70 LOT V/C/N/TY MAP .. 00 \\\ AO \ PROPOSED 8' / NOTES VIEW PROFILE #2 �p _ - - NATURAL ND PROPOSED GRADING A V A SIDEWALK , Boo- 760 - 680 00 _ _ _ \ \ \ F \ TO BE RELOCATED SINGLE FA MIL Y \ 7C EX. POWER POLE 760 Tz0 680 � i 760 V A O EX R/W b' t06 'F? ' ' Al � v A A EX, CURB &� o � ,T, o PITCH• ry /� �PROPOSED CURB �m R m 2"erNL 720 \ \\ \ \ \ PROPOSED R/W go \ \ -EXISTING 8"" SEWER \ \ ` / 0 �X, SIGNAGE TO BE RELOC9TED ,� 1R5 \�\ RL 680 •,,\ o 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680 .720 760 800. 840 880. 920 960. 1000 1040 1080 1120 \� o - �• / Ps �`' \�` Y _r ) y n \\ CONNECT 70 EX. 10" ACP WATER 8�`�p' ^ / •.:.- 90 35 / 5 \ \\ m l r�r� l Alii. 32D i EXISTING 8 SEWER R \ $ 9 VIEW PROFILE #3 PROPOSED GRADING A'\`BP V-9 )y r' BaoNATURAL PROPOSED MEDIAN p O,` &., / 15 RrN 5 \ r \ �\ dJ IYJ-J JAM, J� ✓� �J 7'0 -58 ^ w 800" 760 720 680 Summar N ¢ pPad--754A"ST. PLAN TYPE # OF BLDGS. p PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY S.F 6 DETACHED 60X70 30 PMSE OWAL POSED 5,295 31 PLAN 1 24 24 511 P "A" ST 491 SUBTOTAL 47 1009 SINGLE FAMILY 5,140 34 _-------- 11 4,857 CLUSTER UNITS XISTIN :.z � 00 PLAN 1 18 I� lope a /r --------------------------------------- 16 OPOSE " a 8 ST. .PLAN 3 29 PROPOSED 401 SUBTOTAL Pad=7 6.0'- MULTI -FAMILY UNITS 39 4,462 4-PLEX 2 8 40 ---- Lots - '16-18 SUBTOTAL 61 18 182 4,924 PR Lot 10 PROPOSED 5,159 ADE - 5,022 WON,' BLVD. 5,347 of 29 ' Pad + 7082- _- 5,731 46 5,683 - - 0 . 5,419 47 ----- EXI ---- TING G --- - ADE -z - -- ---- - WALL 5,911 26 _ a 50 m 27 15 631 -- 4645 28 6,414 Si 5,160 Lot 1 1 4,763 � i 760 V A O EX R/W b' t06 'F? ' ' Al � v A A EX, CURB &� o � ,T, o PITCH• ry /� �PROPOSED CURB �m R m 2"erNL 720 \ \\ \ \ \ PROPOSED R/W go \ \ -EXISTING 8"" SEWER \ \ ` / 0 �X, SIGNAGE TO BE RELOC9TED ,� 1R5 \�\ RL 680 •,,\ o 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680 .720 760 800. 840 880. 920 960. 1000 1040 1080 1120 \� o - �• / Ps �`' \�` Y _r ) y n \\ CONNECT 70 EX. 10" ACP WATER 8�`�p' ^ / •.:.- 90 35 / 5 \ \\ m l r�r� l Alii. 32D i EXISTING 8 SEWER R \ $ 9 VIEW PROFILE #3 PROPOSED GRADING A'\`BP V-9 )y r' BaoNATURAL PROPOSED MEDIAN p O,` &., / 15 RrN 5 \ r \ �\ dJ IYJ-J JAM, J� ✓� �J 7'0 -58 ^ w 800" 760 720 680 840 <O\ Z '. S`p1PM Y,yps1 , `�\• o> > s 3y8'\ \ Nei EX SIGNAGE TO BE = �-1 gym\ To BE RELOCATED 800 lrStl\i:l AIL- 331411y o S a �R' � 0 „+ � AA• ROti I v PROPOSED SIGNAL .QW o y ® s N • 1V• ps11 o i� cn� CONNECT TO EXISTING R" 7s6 10" s _ r 1\5 20� s. '�\ \♦ r P' 6 o �kd ". pgRpONDP 1� i 720 v W 65 - .� St IRA \ w .. ps12 . r �l (y ps1395 \ ----R \p WSMt BUILDING SUMMARY Vo 30" LANDS P s 7 .^ 9 2 P 10 g No � Summar I of Areas PLAN TYPE # OF BLDGS. # OF UNITS X OF TOTAL SINGLE FAMILY S.F 6 DETACHED 60X70 30 5,127 CLUSTER UNITS 5,295 31 PLAN 1 24 24 511 PLAN 2 23 23 491 SUBTOTAL 47 1009 SINGLE FAMILY 5,140 34 CONDOMINIUMS 11 4,857 CLUSTER UNITS 4,235 12 PLAN 1 18 18 251 PLAN 2 26 16 351 .PLAN 3 29 PROPOSED 401 SUBTOTAL Pad=7 6.0'- MULTI -FAMILY UNITS 39 4,462 4-PLEX 2 8 40 6-PLEX 9 a oe OW SUBTOTAL 61 18 OTAL # OF UNITS 182 4,924 PR POSED 43 5,159 20 5,022 "A" ST 5,347 of 29 30 45 5,297 _- 5,731 46 5,683 23 5,419 47 4,169 EXIS ING DE 4,808 25 MS WALL 5,911 26 _ a 50 5466 27 15 631 -- 4645 28 6,414 Si 5,160 29 1 4,763 GR I� hm p Lot 9 - (STING __----- -- ____ ____ --- -- ---_ --- -- Lr 04 S DI OND BAR . - - P OPOSE pa =727.5 BLVD. j Pates 25' Pa =7220* "e" ST. 1 1 PROP SED RE AINING WALL P OPOSE RETAIN NG WA PR L POSED GRADE m 840 <O\ Z '. S`p1PM Y,yps1 , `�\• o> > s 3y8'\ \ Nei EX SIGNAGE TO BE = �-1 gym\ To BE RELOCATED 800 lrStl\i:l AIL- 331411y o S a �R' � 0 „+ � AA• ROti I v PROPOSED SIGNAL .QW o y ® s N • 1V• ps11 o i� cn� CONNECT TO EXISTING R" 7s6 10" s _ r 1\5 20� s. '�\ \♦ r P' 6 o �kd ". pgRpONDP 1� i 720 v W 65 - .� St IRA \ w .. ps12 . r �l (y ps1395 \ ----R \p WSMt BUILDING SUMMARY Vo 30" LANDS P s 7 .^ 9 2 P 10 g No � Summar I of Areas PLAN TYPE # OF BLDGS. # OF UNITS X OF TOTAL SINGLE FAMILY S.F 6 DETACHED 60X70 30 5,127 CLUSTER UNITS 5,295 31 PLAN 1 24 24 511 PLAN 2 23 23 491 SUBTOTAL 47 1009 SINGLE FAMILY 5,140 34 CONDOMINIUMS 11 4,857 CLUSTER UNITS 4,235 12 PLAN 1 18 18 251 PLAN 2 26 16 351 .PLAN 3 29 29 401 SUBTOTAL 73 1001 MULTI -FAMILY UNITS 39 4,462 4-PLEX 2 8 40 6-PLEX 9 54 4,682 SUBTOTAL 61 18 OTAL # OF UNITS 182 4,924 1. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 8714-002-900, 8714-002-901, 8714-002-902, 8714-002-903 AND 8714-015-901. 2 EXISTING & PROPOSED ZONING: SITE D SPECIFIC PLAN 3. EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT 4, PROPOSED LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL 5. EXISTING & PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN: SPECIFIC PLAN, SITE D. 6. ALL STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND GRADING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DIAMOND BAR STANDARDS, ORDINANCES AND APPROVED MODIFICATIONS HERETO. 7. ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD SHALL BE ACCOMMODATED ON THE FINAL DESIGN, OR THEY SHALL BE EITHER QUITCLAIMED, ABANDONED OR RELOCATED TO THE SATISFACTION OF ALL INTERESTED PARTIES. DRAINAGE AND PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS NECESSARY TO SERVE THIS PROJECT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AND WITH THE UTILITY PURVEYORS. EXISTING STORM DRAIN EASEMENTS WILL BE ABANDONED DURING THE FINAL MAP PROCEDURES. & MULTI FAMILY BUILDING TO MEET NFPA 13 STANDARDS. 9. ESTIMATED EARTHWORK QUANTITIES: 415,500 CYS. CUT, 415,500 CYS. FILL. 10. SEWER SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT. 11. PER LA COUNTY FIRM PANEL 1880 OF 2350. 12. PRIVATE WATER QUALITY BAI TO BE MAINTAINED BY H.O.A. 13. LOTS 62 & 63 ARE TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR & MAINTAINED BY THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. 14. ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG DIAMOND BAR BLVD, BREA CANYON RD AND % 680 1' I 1 I - -- -. �3 A • ` • \ , \ PASADO ON. TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. "} - o ao 86 120 Iso zoo zao zao szo sso aoo aao aao szo 560 soo 640 sao 72o Iso aoo aao aeo azo TOTAL GROSS 247,342 S.F. _ $96 \ Ps - " "� - sl ' '� 2' ps1 .+ \\ \ ` - -- EX SIGNAGE TO BE -o '•' N P \ E 5.7 A0. 15 ALL TRASH IS INDIVIDUAL PICK UP BY WASTE MANAGEMENT. TRASH PICK UP .FOR / .Q h o ^ 5-(R <cy \ \ ✓ \ wP 5 AVERAGE GROSS 5,263 S.F.' 6' _ 1 i0 BE RELOCATED ry m o o \/ _ 0 Bm"0 \ \ q00 \ o j6 MSE LOTS 2 THROUGH 5 NEEDS i0 BE LOCATED ON "B" STREET. TRASH PICK UP FOR ,/ `"' a, o m - ` p§. _ �• .� s1 9 s1 \ \ l ps1 LOT i WILL BE ALONG THE LOOP ALLEY. 6" a i.6" Y ) _ r r RIGHT -OF WAY TO 'i p /`^ • P - CF.IPER /PLA N 6" 12" 12" J TO l vlr!'T Jva -T6r�r%I ���fJJ / OW BE DEDICATED i E - \ \ \ `° ""� p p p4 \ \ CITY OF DI D BAR � • 60 � ps1 \ 1 W5' LOTS 1-5 TO BE MAPPED FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES. - o e ,� \ c 1 ,,, 165 ✓� m � \ � \ P ps1 \\ � r \ R-3' PER PLAN / o / EX, 12" ACP WATER �5 1h"�•;. • Ps1 o a �, s� 0 w - \ �; 1 65 ` \• ` pW 17 STORM DRAIN SYSTEM TO BE PRIVATE. AO y UT/L/TY AGENC/E o / e / R _, - , 26 1°1p1°6 a9% \ P L9 Ot \\ •\�♦ Ps1 °' \� g• BN•nP SCHOOL DISTRICT: POSTAL SERVICE: R=1/2" R=1/2" FL R= 112* / l � _ En BE TO BE \ �/ OW ` - ' 0 'I WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WALNUT VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT USPS _. EXISTING TREES 70 BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED PER TREE SURVEY. el • '' ^ PROPOSED MEDIA / - / P \ �. s 16p • \ ���. ,. \ ps1 P \ \ ,. \ 1 271 S. BREA CANYON ROAD 880 SOUTH LEMON AVE. 1317 SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BLVD. - = ,' 413.P. w \ 1g15 • \• 0' 5 w4[ \ \ \\ WALNUT, CA 91789 WALNUT, CA 91789 DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 • :' __�� P09 POLE ? h i '� 2 / ( ) ( ) " Ex o , t . 1` - P° 9• \ 909 595-7554 eoD 275-6777 LOT SUMMARY �o .. TO BE RELO .. 10p �QI ♦ 14$ \ \ ♦ •. 6 PROPOSED SIGNAL l MoOlFica TION AT / PPROPosED R Rw -_ y , o o �//�'- . `�s q6\\ 1 ,, \797 A�o. wP♦s1 \ cs I i\ /\ ��� 60 N� N� 6r5 \ •\ \ Y 2 5P \\ I1fDEpWONE SERVICE: TRASH: SINGLE FAMILY HOMES) SEWER SERVICE: TRUNK LINES Lot No. Land Use LdB ACtBB 24DIAMOND BAR BLVD. WASTE MANAGEMENT INC. LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT &BREA CANYON RD. 1400 PHILLIPS RANCH RD. 13940 E. LIVE OAK AVE. 1955 WORKMAN MILL ROAD LOT1 MULTI -FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO 62 3.3 ^ L� /y �p GUM - - - - LOTS 2-5 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDOS 73 5.9 4' ROLLED CURB k GUTTER 6 CURB & GUI ,C^ ` s _--- / m m W / e p •`\ \1 pot 53 / 11 \ N y 1� A (O )NA, - 91766 (800) 266-7551 (562) 699-7411 _ Ex. R w � ° � \\ BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 WHITTIER, CA 90507 ED 47 NTS NTS � _ \+� \\ '�t" o 2 . \ 0 1 g \\ 800 483-5000 - _" -EX CCURB _ .3' rt 121\\ „ 8 FK \ ` ` 5 \ \ P �• LOTS 6-52 SINGLE FAMILY DETACH 5 7 --- /` ,150 - \ I \ \ 118• `' 1'R' :.. p,1 3 " ELECTRIC SERVICE: (EOR REFERENCE ONLY) (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) EX. POWER POLE '� - - / --- " P \` s \y c�R� ' �' ^' �\ Ps 0 \' 1 ae 60 \ TRASH: (FOR MULTI -FAMILY) SEWER SERVICE: (MAIN LINES) LOT 53-57 SLOPES/OPEN SPACE 5.7 70 BE RELOCATED -� ^- "'-- - i `\ `\ 1\ ?\� P q % �-( 154 °>\ o\ \ o, ♦ 5 ps1 9• / -\ \ SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. VALLEY VISTA INC. LOS ANGELES COUNTY OF PUBLIC WORKS - --� -' rR \ • q � % RE��. � ps1 w se I � 5'<y'L 800 CIENEGA AVE, 13940E LIVE OAK AVE. SEWER MAINTENANCE DISTRICT LOT 58 PRIVATE STREETS 4.0 SAN DIMAS, CA V91773 1 BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 900 FREEMONT LOT // o $0 683 BE _^ ip' Z° \ �'ro P (800) 655-4555 00) 266-7551 ALHAMB A - 1 3�8 RIGHY-OF-WAVY 680 \- ps V1 �' �\ ". 1b0 ri LOT 62 6 RAIN AGARDEN PARK/BASIN 1 0�� / (8 RA C 01 p 4 1 �FMP-4o oRM DRAIN , \\ \ ps1 11 V-6 0 31 1 a o 1 0%` Rar r GAS SERVICE: 3' BE DEDICATED r THE / I 6 V - _�! 1 CABLE N: p p / µ1EDTA FILTER LOW FLOW , _ P 11 w. 1 w 11 ' \ 1 3 _ ✓ / 3' BROW IiY OF DI MOND BAR a / NREATMEN B P � 2/ SISION 10 s1�1 ' �<`'' Ps ` , " • ` 6� 1 Psj6 o m L r' ON H. TYP SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. TIME WARNER LOT 63 PARK 0.9 GARAGE __, - � P \� �- - \ � � I I `A`•- _ / 1919 S. STATE COLLEGE BLVD. 0, DOOR / r _ \ CTURE m .. 6 \ I o \ c / rr ryq, rr 1041 E ROUTE 66 RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATED TO 0.5 / \ \ \ - pyc� \ l X106 a - s is (800) 427-220006 �I 1 \v 1 S �c r� GLENDORA, CA 91740 TOTAL THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 182 29.9 �. 2% MIN 25 �-'----- :. ;t bc ,. _. \ l \. ,_. Q � 4 • s1 3 r� r' i�� s oti+ I \\ p rr BENCH MARK - a /. 4' 1'L 1140± _ P' •F'a, I f _ I 1 rr � '<�%`• / ' oA $ - - o <t ; � ; � '. 1 "' ` ps1 Ps ` m qc -' . I I I .5 /,? ,,,,0 2 I. r. LOS ANGELES COUNTY BENCHMARK NO. G 5073 ELEVATION: 726.809 DATUM: NAVD 88, Ex. CAL BUILDINGS 2005 ADJUSTMENT / 135 _ I I o \ ' ` 1 - i 3' TOE ) P/ SCALE. 1 "=50, D EX R W /i r • - ,. r, 740 - I / 00/ �. / ✓ ! ^ 'La r DESCRIPTION: EX POWER POLE / / yC�OP 0\N /,- / / . - '- / b F ..Et• � 1 � 2 s :� ps `n ' 'yo i r DITCH, TYP • TY /NGS �i` R, ' �. z9 R o 0' CURB DETAIL AND UTILITIES PR POgED CURB F �/ p _r� Q ? J y' �l LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TAG IN EAST CURB OF DIAMOND KITS TO BE RELOCATED / / -� / ;n p0 ' ��� / / ,' / � " l - I � - /� %f' G \ -- / , r; ;� _ SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDO MULTI FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO BAR BLVD. 42.7 FEET EAST OF CENTERLINE AND 95 FEET NORTH OF CENTERLINE OF PROPOSED R/W / 10 sl .: ' g0E`'� i g •O ° r (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) / / /. / h /. , > P _ _--. /.., Ps o. \ b r ,% 110.2 - 111.0 CROOKED CREEK DRIVE. / �. / _ > 12 ? PEDESTRIAN l l / � / ^ Of o1 / 0 � � ° a � , m''z 1 1 ,38 (SSWALK / ep � / / � ' r 29. g5, \ -. � � Xr 107.7 41.5' 28.0' 41.5' CURB n / �p / "� / �A' / W >22 , s / \ O / A' i _;G'. X10 �'' A� �l`\\* q', 1 N'k r.r / - , \ cuRo LEGAL DESCRIPTION ( / A 10.0' W 26' r' ' \ - /5, >o - 9' 6 AQV_. r -c _ , ' r/ v r, 32' BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 9 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO / / / ,r e a :! 2 CP 5 / / r '' - �'ss,1b'51. // , / / 90 ` , Try'v� � rrr MIN. MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, GOUTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Ypr� o\S,gA•r ^.� 5- A1�' ',%'rY�• r % ,,:.1psI/ r-> B � �/4 �/ gp,0A7b =,� vv v vL.. .�P3', , 4' r / r' .r 5.5' 317" o w I 5.5 94.5' 2 D 7 DEVELOPMENT S TANDARDS L 38.8' BROW ARK PER SITE D SPECIFIC PLAN 5 / - e 14 7.5' 75' GFRE TRUCK s / 5.5' 4 134.5' DEVELOPMENT STANDARD/LOWMEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL REQUIRED PROVIDEDTURNING RADIUS DETAIL 4 XISTING NDERGROUND 10.0' MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS 200 182 Al MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE 60% 41.9% TYPICAL �- z°• 0 , . I ro 5.5' - \I - - /> 1 , ',_-- - MINIMUM YARD SETBACKS: FRONT YARD 10 FEET 10 FEET tAr REAR YARD 15 FEET 88 FEET*OFF-STREET PARK/NG QNTS p ,v ' 0/ 75. SIDE YARD INTERIOR 10 FEET ONE 10 FEET * SIDE 5 OTHER CURB 12,2' SIDE YARD STREET 10 FEET STREET 10 FEET 5 / SIDE 5 ON OTHER 5 FEET wNEEL9'- SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED (60X70) r LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS 15% 6. 3' To STOP \� // ^^m°/ \ g0 / /' ,' ,3 00' ` / �� r OITCw TYP PRIVATE LANDSCAPED AREAS 15% OS r i 1.. - 16° r'' / s. Tr'7r1Cr l2 )r/-Jrr- / // /(w /�', VQ0�- `70 �•' ;`/ j � /� , SS II I II II1 ?.ts�. m -% �^o\ I _ � �_ �„ o /41 /_ ry ^^ti. • `r \O. ^` or r 3r \ P16 010- X8680. 0�' 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK � COMMON LANDSCAPED AREAS 4'4% 18.8' TOTAL LANDSCAPED AREAS 59% .os >r.r A10 jr160 PARKING SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED ExsnNc RESIDENT PARKING 94 2 ENCLOSED 94 ESM7 5.0' -4 I 0'5.0' 700 SPACES PER UNT) 5.0GUEST PARKING 32 (1 SPACE PER 3 185 5.REQUIRED RESIDENT SPACES) ROW PARKING SINGLE FAMILY TYPICAL STREET SECT/ONS , RE 11. 2' 19.Q' CONDO/MULTI-FAMILY. DITCH, TYR 70.0' 19.8' RESIDENT PARKING 270 1 ENCLOSED SPACE PER 270 r SERVICE RO/D AND A _> 9 - O rr r� CT No, 2{JF�{� PEDESTRIA)V ACCESS ONLY - 1 BEDROOM UNIT, 2 ENCLOSED ' l EMERGENCY INGRE55/CGRE55 _ SPACES PER UNITS WITH 2 w ggqq OR MORE BEDROOMS) � <; / � � � j � � 'rl TCH, TYP Fe 0`)" E �`L /U/ GUEST PARKING 90 (1 SPACE PER 3 "11 19 3' TOE DITCH, TYP ��� \-@" `� r s REQUIRED RESIDENT SPACES) y . w ` 'k �. A �� b� til` fz' EASEM Nr AJ --- -. - I \ 1. ? / 8' EASEMENT 2' 15.0' 2' TOTAL PARKING TVP/CAL ON STREET \ I \ / y iq, 1q•p• p• OS' EASEMENT D.5• 2' 12. e' 2' RESIDENT PARKING. 364 364 PARALLEL PARK/NG / ^a-. m` / os' os' 0.5 _ 0.5' NTS. GUEST PARKING. 122 296 � 3d' LANDSCAPE SETBACK v Pv �� / EMERGENCY 90 \ \ I ' ,`' 2'1 OP 7/ ,2 111 2 1 2111 CURB INGRESS/EGRESS ` \ / i6o % / / \ pK z, 4,pi z, » DEVIATION TO SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SETBACKS REQUIRED 1�1 fd' / \ Z` 0 �4.Y SWALE SWALE Z.1 1 'Na"Y E ¢ NORTHERLY CL SOUTHERLY \ `s' �y \\ AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM) R/w BERM ° R/W R/W R/W R/W 46' R/W R RIGHT-OF-WAY TO SECTION A -A ENTRY - PORTION OF "A" STREET (PRIVATE) SECTION B -B ENTRY - PORTION OF "A" STREET (PRIVATE) 50' 50' 8' 42' 4' 35' 8' i M DI IN I 3• 2,07 2.0% 6' CURB & GUTTER CURB 6" CURB & GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK SECTION L -L EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) WALL 54R/W 54' I BTDEDICATEDPFND BAR _ ' �� ,'- / SECTION 1-1 SECTION J -J SECTION K -K 23.0' 23.0' _ 27'0' 27'0' 27'0' 27'01 I/ o. k EMERGENCY ACCESS ROAD SERVICE ACCESS ROAD PEDESTRIAWSERWaACGESS ROAD 36'LOT 55 I 14.0' 26' 14.0' I ---�-- I / ' S' _ (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) IfA' 1A' S'I A. /r\\ '4- 10 IS 1 IS I IU 4 2' - 8' -- Br - 2' ♦- ,.", i /. PKWY PKWY Y 22 .,y 2� l��RKI p0 "55 SIDEWALK SIDEW QP v\ a• 32'31.75'SIDEWALK SIDEWALK 5 , I, J w wCURB & CURB & CURB �� ¢ GUTTER GUTTER t1 TETE" FL u FL FL cQi FL GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER 4' 28' 4' 3' 28' 19' 2.875' 26' 2.875' SECTION C -C SECTION D -D NOR STREET LOCA( STREET MIN. TRAVEL MIN. MIN. TRAVEL PARKING MIN. TRAVEL MIN. 'A' STREET - LOCAL STREET 'A' STREET • LOCAL STREET (TAPER) PARKING BOTH SIDES \, �$ ~D$ \ 1 PARKING BOTH SIDES NO PARKING (PRIVATE) 4" RourD D" cuee d" ROLLED 4" ROLLED 0' CURB CURB CURB 6"CURB CURB (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) r. ..� \ SECTION F -F SECTION G -G SECTION H -H 4 r � PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS R/W R/w 2' 11 I 50'54' I 42' 8' 4' 42' I 8.1 1 S MI I 1 2 ~ I oz z1 I cu K e R 6" CURB & GI/TIER' 8' SIDEWALK \-6" CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED 8" SIDEWALK -8" FOE ALK SECTION L -L PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) 50' 150' 35' 4' 45' M DIA I Mon m- 3 CURB -6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER - SECTION )I EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD (PUBLIC) r�PROPOSED w R/W RWROl4Yfd7S RW iib' I 5o' 60, 8' 1 1 8' 35' 4' 63 �1 3' M DIA, 1 _ _ MP% 201 2.0% 2'1 nmm CUR6 L PROPOSED 6" CURB & GUTTER RETAINING WALL 6 CURB & CUTTER 8' SIDEWALK 5' SIDEWALK SECTION M -M PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) 14" 35' MEgIAN 1/ 6" CDR:; URB fi CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 3' SIDEWALK SECTION N -N EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) PROPOSED RIPROYFIIENIS If►1 r�PROPOSED MPROWWMT9 R�106' R/W 50' 1 11 56' 156' 1 f 8' 42' 4' 1 41' 1 B'l 3' I MDII 3• LN I I Z.1 an1 2. 09, I I PROPOS! CURB L RETAININ 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER B' SIDEWALK PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK SECTION N -N PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD (PUBLIC) PRIVATE STREET PRNATF STREET TYPICAL PRIVATE DRIVE (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) AND FIRE LANE (PRIVATE) F � PROPOSED IMPROVEMEMS PEW 8 •. R/W T y 92' RI✓ 40' 40' 40' 1 52' 8' 32' 32' 8' 1 1 1 20% 201 20% mwww _ m_ WALL L 6" CURB & GDM°R 6' CURB & GU FR 6- CURB & GUTTER i 8 SIDEWALK '-EXISNNG'8" SIDEWALK 6" CURB &GUTTER SECTION 0-0 SECTION 0-0 EXISTING BREA CANYON ROAD PROPOSED BREA GANYON ROAD (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) DENSITY SUMMARY Summar I of Areas CONDO Lot No. S.F Lot No. S.F 6 7,867 30 5,127 7 5,295 31 6,674 8 4,945 32 6,329 9 4,928 33 5,346 10 5,140 34 4,408 11 4,857 35 4,235 12 4,761 36 4,227 13 7,033 37 4,230 14 4,902 38 4,232 15 4,646 39 4,462 16 4,328 40 4,652 17 4,682 41 4,715 18 7,473 42 4,924 19 6,095 43 5,159 20 5,022 44 5,347 21 5,214 45 5,297 22 5,731 46 5,683 23 5,419 47 4,169 24 7,196 48 4,808 25 4,577 49 5,911 26 5 214 50 5466 27 15 631 51 4645 28 6,414 Si 5,160 29 1 4,763 1. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 8714-002-900, 8714-002-901, 8714-002-902, 8714-002-903 AND 8714-015-901. 2 EXISTING & PROPOSED ZONING: SITE D SPECIFIC PLAN 3. EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT 4, PROPOSED LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL 5. EXISTING & PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN: SPECIFIC PLAN, SITE D. 6. ALL STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND GRADING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DIAMOND BAR STANDARDS, ORDINANCES AND APPROVED MODIFICATIONS HERETO. 7. ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD SHALL BE ACCOMMODATED ON THE FINAL DESIGN, OR THEY SHALL BE EITHER QUITCLAIMED, ABANDONED OR RELOCATED TO THE SATISFACTION OF ALL INTERESTED PARTIES. DRAINAGE AND PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS NECESSARY TO SERVE THIS PROJECT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AND WITH THE UTILITY PURVEYORS. EXISTING STORM DRAIN EASEMENTS WILL BE ABANDONED DURING THE FINAL MAP PROCEDURES. & MULTI FAMILY BUILDING TO MEET NFPA 13 STANDARDS. 9. ESTIMATED EARTHWORK QUANTITIES: 415,500 CYS. CUT, 415,500 CYS. FILL. 10. SEWER SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT. 11. PER LA COUNTY FIRM PANEL 1880 OF 2350. 12. PRIVATE WATER QUALITY BAI TO BE MAINTAINED BY H.O.A. 13. LOTS 62 & 63 ARE TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR & MAINTAINED BY THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. 14. ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG DIAMOND BAR BLVD, BREA CANYON RD AND % 680 1' I 1 I - -- -. �3 A • ` • \ , \ PASADO ON. TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. "} - o ao 86 120 Iso zoo zao zao szo sso aoo aao aao szo 560 soo 640 sao 72o Iso aoo aao aeo azo TOTAL GROSS 247,342 S.F. _ $96 \ Ps - " "� - sl ' '� 2' ps1 .+ \\ \ ` - -- EX SIGNAGE TO BE -o '•' N P \ E 5.7 A0. 15 ALL TRASH IS INDIVIDUAL PICK UP BY WASTE MANAGEMENT. TRASH PICK UP .FOR / .Q h o ^ 5-(R <cy \ \ ✓ \ wP 5 AVERAGE GROSS 5,263 S.F.' 6' _ 1 i0 BE RELOCATED ry m o o \/ _ 0 Bm"0 \ \ q00 \ o j6 MSE LOTS 2 THROUGH 5 NEEDS i0 BE LOCATED ON "B" STREET. TRASH PICK UP FOR ,/ `"' a, o m - ` p§. _ �• .� s1 9 s1 \ \ l ps1 LOT i WILL BE ALONG THE LOOP ALLEY. 6" a i.6" Y ) _ r r RIGHT -OF WAY TO 'i p /`^ • P - CF.IPER /PLA N 6" 12" 12" J TO l vlr!'T Jva -T6r�r%I ���fJJ / OW BE DEDICATED i E - \ \ \ `° ""� p p p4 \ \ CITY OF DI D BAR � • 60 � ps1 \ 1 W5' LOTS 1-5 TO BE MAPPED FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES. - o e ,� \ c 1 ,,, 165 ✓� m � \ � \ P ps1 \\ � r \ R-3' PER PLAN / o / EX, 12" ACP WATER �5 1h"�•;. • Ps1 o a �, s� 0 w - \ �; 1 65 ` \• ` pW 17 STORM DRAIN SYSTEM TO BE PRIVATE. AO y UT/L/TY AGENC/E o / e / R _, - , 26 1°1p1°6 a9% \ P L9 Ot \\ •\�♦ Ps1 °' \� g• BN•nP SCHOOL DISTRICT: POSTAL SERVICE: R=1/2" R=1/2" FL R= 112* / l � _ En BE TO BE \ �/ OW ` - ' 0 'I WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WALNUT VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT USPS _. EXISTING TREES 70 BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED PER TREE SURVEY. el • '' ^ PROPOSED MEDIA / - / P \ �. s 16p • \ ���. ,. \ ps1 P \ \ ,. \ 1 271 S. BREA CANYON ROAD 880 SOUTH LEMON AVE. 1317 SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BLVD. - = ,' 413.P. w \ 1g15 • \• 0' 5 w4[ \ \ \\ WALNUT, CA 91789 WALNUT, CA 91789 DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 • :' __�� P09 POLE ? h i '� 2 / ( ) ( ) " Ex o , t . 1` - P° 9• \ 909 595-7554 eoD 275-6777 LOT SUMMARY �o .. TO BE RELO .. 10p �QI ♦ 14$ \ \ ♦ •. 6 PROPOSED SIGNAL l MoOlFica TION AT / PPROPosED R Rw -_ y , o o �//�'- . `�s q6\\ 1 ,, \797 A�o. wP♦s1 \ cs I i\ /\ ��� 60 N� N� 6r5 \ •\ \ Y 2 5P \\ I1fDEpWONE SERVICE: TRASH: SINGLE FAMILY HOMES) SEWER SERVICE: TRUNK LINES Lot No. Land Use LdB ACtBB 24DIAMOND BAR BLVD. WASTE MANAGEMENT INC. LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT &BREA CANYON RD. 1400 PHILLIPS RANCH RD. 13940 E. LIVE OAK AVE. 1955 WORKMAN MILL ROAD LOT1 MULTI -FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO 62 3.3 ^ L� /y �p GUM - - - - LOTS 2-5 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDOS 73 5.9 4' ROLLED CURB k GUTTER 6 CURB & GUI ,C^ ` s _--- / m m W / e p •`\ \1 pot 53 / 11 \ N y 1� A (O )NA, - 91766 (800) 266-7551 (562) 699-7411 _ Ex. R w � ° � \\ BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 WHITTIER, CA 90507 ED 47 NTS NTS � _ \+� \\ '�t" o 2 . \ 0 1 g \\ 800 483-5000 - _" -EX CCURB _ .3' rt 121\\ „ 8 FK \ ` ` 5 \ \ P �• LOTS 6-52 SINGLE FAMILY DETACH 5 7 --- /` ,150 - \ I \ \ 118• `' 1'R' :.. p,1 3 " ELECTRIC SERVICE: (EOR REFERENCE ONLY) (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) EX. POWER POLE '� - - / --- " P \` s \y c�R� ' �' ^' �\ Ps 0 \' 1 ae 60 \ TRASH: (FOR MULTI -FAMILY) SEWER SERVICE: (MAIN LINES) LOT 53-57 SLOPES/OPEN SPACE 5.7 70 BE RELOCATED -� ^- "'-- - i `\ `\ 1\ ?\� P q % �-( 154 °>\ o\ \ o, ♦ 5 ps1 9• / -\ \ SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. VALLEY VISTA INC. LOS ANGELES COUNTY OF PUBLIC WORKS - --� -' rR \ • q � % RE��. � ps1 w se I � 5'<y'L 800 CIENEGA AVE, 13940E LIVE OAK AVE. SEWER MAINTENANCE DISTRICT LOT 58 PRIVATE STREETS 4.0 SAN DIMAS, CA V91773 1 BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 900 FREEMONT LOT // o $0 683 BE _^ ip' Z° \ �'ro P (800) 655-4555 00) 266-7551 ALHAMB A - 1 3�8 RIGHY-OF-WAVY 680 \- ps V1 �' �\ ". 1b0 ri LOT 62 6 RAIN AGARDEN PARK/BASIN 1 0�� / (8 RA C 01 p 4 1 �FMP-4o oRM DRAIN , \\ \ ps1 11 V-6 0 31 1 a o 1 0%` Rar r GAS SERVICE: 3' BE DEDICATED r THE / I 6 V - _�! 1 CABLE N: p p / µ1EDTA FILTER LOW FLOW , _ P 11 w. 1 w 11 ' \ 1 3 _ ✓ / 3' BROW IiY OF DI MOND BAR a / NREATMEN B P � 2/ SISION 10 s1�1 ' �<`'' Ps ` , " • ` 6� 1 Psj6 o m L r' ON H. TYP SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. TIME WARNER LOT 63 PARK 0.9 GARAGE __, - � P \� �- - \ � � I I `A`•- _ / 1919 S. STATE COLLEGE BLVD. 0, DOOR / r _ \ CTURE m .. 6 \ I o \ c / rr ryq, rr 1041 E ROUTE 66 RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATED TO 0.5 / \ \ \ - pyc� \ l X106 a - s is (800) 427-220006 �I 1 \v 1 S �c r� GLENDORA, CA 91740 TOTAL THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 182 29.9 �. 2% MIN 25 �-'----- :. ;t bc ,. _. \ l \. ,_. Q � 4 • s1 3 r� r' i�� s oti+ I \\ p rr BENCH MARK - a /. 4' 1'L 1140± _ P' •F'a, I f _ I 1 rr � '<�%`• / ' oA $ - - o <t ; � ; � '. 1 "' ` ps1 Ps ` m qc -' . I I I .5 /,? ,,,,0 2 I. r. LOS ANGELES COUNTY BENCHMARK NO. G 5073 ELEVATION: 726.809 DATUM: NAVD 88, Ex. CAL BUILDINGS 2005 ADJUSTMENT / 135 _ I I o \ ' ` 1 - i 3' TOE ) P/ SCALE. 1 "=50, D EX R W /i r • - ,. r, 740 - I / 00/ �. / ✓ ! ^ 'La r DESCRIPTION: EX POWER POLE / / yC�OP 0\N /,- / / . - '- / b F ..Et• � 1 � 2 s :� ps `n ' 'yo i r DITCH, TYP • TY /NGS �i` R, ' �. z9 R o 0' CURB DETAIL AND UTILITIES PR POgED CURB F �/ p _r� Q ? J y' �l LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TAG IN EAST CURB OF DIAMOND KITS TO BE RELOCATED / / -� / ;n p0 ' ��� / / ,' / � " l - I � - /� %f' G \ -- / , r; ;� _ SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDO MULTI FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO BAR BLVD. 42.7 FEET EAST OF CENTERLINE AND 95 FEET NORTH OF CENTERLINE OF PROPOSED R/W / 10 sl .: ' g0E`'� i g •O ° r (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) / / /. / h /. , > P _ _--. /.., Ps o. \ b r ,% 110.2 - 111.0 CROOKED CREEK DRIVE. / �. / _ > 12 ? PEDESTRIAN l l / � / ^ Of o1 / 0 � � ° a � , m''z 1 1 ,38 (SSWALK / ep � / / � ' r 29. g5, \ -. � � Xr 107.7 41.5' 28.0' 41.5' CURB n / �p / "� / �A' / W >22 , s / \ O / A' i _;G'. X10 �'' A� �l`\\* q', 1 N'k r.r / - , \ cuRo LEGAL DESCRIPTION ( / A 10.0' W 26' r' ' \ - /5, >o - 9' 6 AQV_. r -c _ , ' r/ v r, 32' BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 9 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO / / / ,r e a :! 2 CP 5 / / r '' - �'ss,1b'51. // , / / 90 ` , Try'v� � rrr MIN. MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, GOUTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Ypr� o\S,gA•r ^.� 5- A1�' ',%'rY�• r % ,,:.1psI/ r-> B � �/4 �/ gp,0A7b =,� vv v vL.. .�P3', , 4' r / r' .r 5.5' 317" o w I 5.5 94.5' 2 D 7 DEVELOPMENT S TANDARDS L 38.8' BROW ARK PER SITE D SPECIFIC PLAN 5 / - e 14 7.5' 75' GFRE TRUCK s / 5.5' 4 134.5' DEVELOPMENT STANDARD/LOWMEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL REQUIRED PROVIDEDTURNING RADIUS DETAIL 4 XISTING NDERGROUND 10.0' MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS 200 182 Al MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE 60% 41.9% TYPICAL �- z°• 0 , . I ro 5.5' - \I - - /> 1 , ',_-- - MINIMUM YARD SETBACKS: FRONT YARD 10 FEET 10 FEET tAr REAR YARD 15 FEET 88 FEET*OFF-STREET PARK/NG QNTS p ,v ' 0/ 75. SIDE YARD INTERIOR 10 FEET ONE 10 FEET * SIDE 5 OTHER CURB 12,2' SIDE YARD STREET 10 FEET STREET 10 FEET 5 / SIDE 5 ON OTHER 5 FEET wNEEL9'- SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED (60X70) r LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS 15% 6. 3' To STOP \� // ^^m°/ \ g0 / /' ,' ,3 00' ` / �� r OITCw TYP PRIVATE LANDSCAPED AREAS 15% OS r i 1.. - 16° r'' / s. Tr'7r1Cr l2 )r/-Jrr- / // /(w /�', VQ0�- `70 �•' ;`/ j � /� , SS II I II II1 ?.ts�. m -% �^o\ I _ � �_ �„ o /41 /_ ry ^^ti. • `r \O. ^` or r 3r \ P16 010- X8680. 0�' 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK � COMMON LANDSCAPED AREAS 4'4% 18.8' TOTAL LANDSCAPED AREAS 59% .os >r.r A10 jr160 PARKING SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED ExsnNc RESIDENT PARKING 94 2 ENCLOSED 94 ESM7 5.0' -4 I 0'5.0' 700 SPACES PER UNT) 5.0GUEST PARKING 32 (1 SPACE PER 3 185 5.REQUIRED RESIDENT SPACES) ROW PARKING SINGLE FAMILY TYPICAL STREET SECT/ONS , RE 11. 2' 19.Q' CONDO/MULTI-FAMILY. DITCH, TYR 70.0' 19.8' RESIDENT PARKING 270 1 ENCLOSED SPACE PER 270 r SERVICE RO/D AND A _> 9 - O rr r� CT No, 2{JF�{� PEDESTRIA)V ACCESS ONLY - 1 BEDROOM UNIT, 2 ENCLOSED ' l EMERGENCY INGRE55/CGRE55 _ SPACES PER UNITS WITH 2 w ggqq OR MORE BEDROOMS) � <; / � � � j � � 'rl TCH, TYP Fe 0`)" E �`L /U/ GUEST PARKING 90 (1 SPACE PER 3 "11 19 3' TOE DITCH, TYP ��� \-@" `� r s REQUIRED RESIDENT SPACES) y . w ` 'k �. A �� b� til` fz' EASEM Nr AJ --- -. - I \ 1. ? / 8' EASEMENT 2' 15.0' 2' TOTAL PARKING TVP/CAL ON STREET \ I \ / y iq, 1q•p• p• OS' EASEMENT D.5• 2' 12. e' 2' RESIDENT PARKING. 364 364 PARALLEL PARK/NG / ^a-. m` / os' os' 0.5 _ 0.5' NTS. GUEST PARKING. 122 296 � 3d' LANDSCAPE SETBACK v Pv �� / EMERGENCY 90 \ \ I ' ,`' 2'1 OP 7/ ,2 111 2 1 2111 CURB INGRESS/EGRESS ` \ / i6o % / / \ pK z, 4,pi z, » DEVIATION TO SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SETBACKS REQUIRED 1�1 fd' / \ Z` 0 �4.Y SWALE SWALE Z.1 1 'Na"Y E ¢ NORTHERLY CL SOUTHERLY \ `s' �y \\ AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM) R/w BERM ° R/W R/W R/W R/W 46' R/W R RIGHT-OF-WAY TO SECTION A -A ENTRY - PORTION OF "A" STREET (PRIVATE) SECTION B -B ENTRY - PORTION OF "A" STREET (PRIVATE) 50' 50' 8' 42' 4' 35' 8' i M DI IN I 3• 2,07 2.0% 6' CURB & GUTTER CURB 6" CURB & GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK SECTION L -L EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) WALL 54R/W 54' I BTDEDICATEDPFND BAR _ ' �� ,'- / SECTION 1-1 SECTION J -J SECTION K -K 23.0' 23.0' _ 27'0' 27'0' 27'0' 27'01 I/ o. k EMERGENCY ACCESS ROAD SERVICE ACCESS ROAD PEDESTRIAWSERWaACGESS ROAD 36'LOT 55 I 14.0' 26' 14.0' I ---�-- I / ' S' _ (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) IfA' 1A' S'I A. /r\\ '4- 10 IS 1 IS I IU 4 2' - 8' -- Br - 2' ♦- ,.", i /. PKWY PKWY Y 22 .,y 2� l��RKI p0 "55 SIDEWALK SIDEW QP v\ a• 32'31.75'SIDEWALK SIDEWALK 5 , I, J w wCURB & CURB & CURB �� ¢ GUTTER GUTTER t1 TETE" FL u FL FL cQi FL GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER 4' 28' 4' 3' 28' 19' 2.875' 26' 2.875' SECTION C -C SECTION D -D NOR STREET LOCA( STREET MIN. TRAVEL MIN. MIN. TRAVEL PARKING MIN. TRAVEL MIN. 'A' STREET - LOCAL STREET 'A' STREET • LOCAL STREET (TAPER) PARKING BOTH SIDES \, �$ ~D$ \ 1 PARKING BOTH SIDES NO PARKING (PRIVATE) 4" RourD D" cuee d" ROLLED 4" ROLLED 0' CURB CURB CURB 6"CURB CURB (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) r. ..� \ SECTION F -F SECTION G -G SECTION H -H 4 r � PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS R/W R/w 2' 11 I 50'54' I 42' 8' 4' 42' I 8.1 1 S MI I 1 2 ~ I oz z1 I cu K e R 6" CURB & GI/TIER' 8' SIDEWALK \-6" CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED 8" SIDEWALK -8" FOE ALK SECTION L -L PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) 50' 150' 35' 4' 45' M DIA I Mon m- 3 CURB -6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER - SECTION )I EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD (PUBLIC) r�PROPOSED w R/W RWROl4Yfd7S RW iib' I 5o' 60, 8' 1 1 8' 35' 4' 63 �1 3' M DIA, 1 _ _ MP% 201 2.0% 2'1 nmm CUR6 L PROPOSED 6" CURB & GUTTER RETAINING WALL 6 CURB & CUTTER 8' SIDEWALK 5' SIDEWALK SECTION M -M PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) 14" 35' MEgIAN 1/ 6" CDR:; URB fi CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 3' SIDEWALK SECTION N -N EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) PROPOSED RIPROYFIIENIS If►1 r�PROPOSED MPROWWMT9 R�106' R/W 50' 1 11 56' 156' 1 f 8' 42' 4' 1 41' 1 B'l 3' I MDII 3• LN I I Z.1 an1 2. 09, I I PROPOS! CURB L RETAININ 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER B' SIDEWALK PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK SECTION N -N PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD (PUBLIC) PRIVATE STREET PRNATF STREET TYPICAL PRIVATE DRIVE (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) AND FIRE LANE (PRIVATE) F � PROPOSED IMPROVEMEMS PEW 8 •. R/W T y 92' RI✓ 40' 40' 40' 1 52' 8' 32' 32' 8' 1 1 1 20% 201 20% mwww _ m_ WALL L 6" CURB & GDM°R 6' CURB & GU FR 6- CURB & GUTTER i 8 SIDEWALK '-EXISNNG'8" SIDEWALK 6" CURB &GUTTER SECTION 0-0 SECTION 0-0 EXISTING BREA CANYON ROAD PROPOSED BREA GANYON ROAD (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) DENSITY SUMMARY NUMBER OF UNITS MULTI -FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO NUMBER AREA OF UNITS DENSITY OF UNITS (ACRES) 57 (DUTACRO 62 3.3 1&8 DENSITY SUMMARY NUMBER OF UNITS SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED (60x70) NUMBER AREA DENSITY OF UNITS (ACRES) (DUiACRO 47 57 82 DENSITY SUMMARY NUMBER OF UNITS SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDO NUMBER AREA GUEST (V3 PER UNIT) DENSITY OF UNITS (ACRES) TOTALS 47 (DU/ACRE) 73 5.9 185 124 PARKING SUMMARY - SINGLE FAMILY NUMBER OF UNITS REQUIRED PROVIDED COVERED (2 PER UNFD GUEST (V3 PER UNIT) COVERED (2 PER UNIT) GUEST' TOTALS 47 94 32 94 185 INCLUDES ON -STREET PARKING AND 2 GUEST SPACES IN DRIVEWAY PARKING SUMMARY - MULTI -FAMILY NUMBER OF UNITS REQUIRED PROVIDED COVERED (2 PER UI GUEST (1/3 PER UNIT) COVERED (Z PER UNIT) GUEST TOTALS 135 270 90 270 105 MAP DATE IDENTIFIER MIC OF APAT CWNCE i THIS IMV 07/30/13 BY: LP Ms or T"s 01 09 19 Z 13 7.2213 FIRE AND PLANNING LP DATE REVISION BY DATE Jufy 22, 2013 FEET W.O. 0 30 60 120 GROSS AREA 29.7 AC. t 0 1/2 1 2 CONTOUR INTERVAL 5' INCHES TOTAL LOTS 63 PREPARED FOR. PREPARED BY - 0 1111111111 Y--0WNER T T LEN NAIR0 'X -A Im 25 ENTERPRISE \ ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656 v11r \i (949) 349-8100 Z Q HUNSAKER 6r. ASSOCIATES a I R V I N E I N C 1 I- ENONE RING - SURVEYING !n Three Hughs IMA CA WfiV FX (999) 5810]59 PH: (949) aflY1I11R SITE PLAN I VEST/NG TENTATIVE TRACT 72295 F:\0718\Planning\CA_Project\SITE PLAN\0718P_SITE PLAN. dwg PROJECT PROF/LES (VERTICAL & HORIZONTAL SCALE: V" 60') LEGEND VIEW PROFILE #1 VIEW PROFILE #4 ----- NATURAL GROUND DESIGN GROUND 2 PROPOSED GRADING PROJECT BOUNDARY LINE TOP OF SLOPE 840 800 760 720 680 640 u�V Summar 800 Soo- 760 7s 720 720 240 280 320 MSE WALL MSE A OSED PMSE OWAL POSED RETAINING WALL HEIGHT 31 NING WALL - a� P / 1 \ 800 660 CENTERLINE 1009 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK 5,140 DW PROPOSED WATER 640 � RETOA CLUSTER UNITS XISTIN :.z � 00 h O ENHANCED PAVEMENT p 5 PROPOSED SEWER OPOSE " a 8 ST. .PLAN 3 29 PROPOSED -SD- PROPOSED STORM DRAIN .,Lr v 6.0'- 720 5' RIK RETAINING WALL/ 4-PLEX 2 FIRE HYDRANT 40 ---- PROPOSED '16-18 SUBTOTAL 61 18 182 4,924 PR Lot 10 PROPOSED pl ml ADE - lO WON,' BLVD. MSE ALL P Pad + 7082- _- ;P.d=76 46 5,683 - - 0 . xisi 47 ----- EXI ---- TING G --- - ADE -z ad=757.. ---- "A" ST. Pad 60.0* 26 0' Pa =766.0' m P PROPOSED GRADE 4645 28 6,414 PRC POSED MSE WAI LPadI Lot 49 Lot 441 GR d=711 2 > N ¢ I N I� hm p PR POSED MSE W LL _ + Lot PROW "A"S ED . - Pad= + PROP 'A' ED T. ad=774. s Lot 2 ,- Lot 4 Lot 24 ____ ____ mi0i p ---_ km -- I ROPOS 11.N D PROPOSED MSE ALL _____!ROPOSFD ACCESS OND BAR PROPOSED AC __ ESS ---- PR P ACCESS ---- SED ---- ---- - - - =727.5 --- ------- ---- ---- -------------- ' BLVD. j ------ Lot 6 -- ---- ---- E EXISTING STING o_ ARK I XISTIN ---- ---- 1 1 ---------+ _ry2 C BREA N. RD. I BREA CY . CHANNEL i _ RAIN 'PARK ,,-- RDEN BASIN P - d-7083 Lot 1 PROP Pad- L 08.6- t 1 WALL Pad=7 Lot 7.8' Pad= L 07.4' 1 ISTINC GROUNDM P OPOSE RETAIN NG WA PR L POSED GRADE r: p m 40 RO 190 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680 720 760 800 840 880 920 960 1000 1040 1080 1120 7760 1200 1240 1280 7320 1360 7400 1440 1480 1520 1560 16 u�V Summar 800 Soo- 760 7s 720 720 u�V Summar N ¢ pPad--754A"ST. PLAN TYPE # OF BLDGS. p PROPOSED F' H' LOT LINE 240 280 320 MSE WALL MSE A OSED PMSE OWAL POSED RETAINING WALL HEIGHT 31 NING WALL - a� P / 1 \ 800 660 CENTERLINE 1009 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK 5,140 DW PROPOSED WATER 640 � RETOA CLUSTER UNITS XISTIN :.z � 00 h O ENHANCED PAVEMENT p 5 PROPOSED SEWER OPOSE " a 8 ST. .PLAN 3 29 PROPOSED -SD- PROPOSED STORM DRAIN .,Lr v 6.0'- 720 5' RIK RETAINING WALL/ 4-PLEX 2 FIRE HYDRANT 40 ---- PROPOSED '16-18 SUBTOTAL 61 18 182 4,924 PR Lot 10 PROPOSED pl ml ADE - lO WON,' BLVD. MSE ALL P Pad + 7082- _- ;P.d=76 46 5,683 - - 0 . xisi 47 ----- EXI ---- TING G --- - ADE -z ad=757.. ---- "A" ST. Pad 60.0* 26 0' Pa =766.0' m P ADO R. 4645 28 6,414 Si of Lot 1 1 4,763 Lot 49 Lot 441 GR d=711 u�V Summar N ¢ pPad--754A"ST. PLAN TYPE # OF BLDGS. p PROPOSED F' H' LOT LINE 240 280 320 MSE WALL MSE A OSED PMSE OWAL POSED RETAINING WALL HEIGHT 31 NING WALL - EASEMENT LINE P / 1 \ 800 660 CENTERLINE 1009 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK 5,140 DW PROPOSED WATER 640 � 4,857 CLUSTER UNITS XISTIN :.z � 00 Iq ENHANCED PAVEMENT 750 5 PROPOSED SEWER OPOSE " a 8 ST. .PLAN 3 29 PROPOSED -SD- PROPOSED STORM DRAIN .,Lr v 6.0'- 720 5' RIK RETAINING WALL/ 4-PLEX 2 FIRE HYDRANT / , n v 'r?r1 Ll Ala. 25DDI ' 60x70 LOT V/C/N/TY MAP .. 00 \\\ AO \ PROPOSED 8' / NOTES VIEW PROFILE #2 �p _ - - NATURAL ND PROPOSED GRADING A V A SIDEWALK , Boo- 760 - 680 00 _ _ _ \ \ \ F \ TO BE RELOCATED SINGLE FA MIL Y \ 7C EX. POWER POLE 760 Tz0 680 Summar N ¢ pPad--754A"ST. PLAN TYPE # OF BLDGS. p PROPOSED F' H' 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 PMSE OWAL POSED RETAINING WALL HEIGHT 31 PLAN 1 24 24 511 P / 1 \ SEWER DRAIN LOW PLOW MP -40 MEDIA FILTER 660 47 1009 SINGLE FAMILY 5,140 / DIVERSION STRUCTURE TREATMENT BMP 640 � 4,857 CLUSTER UNITS XISTIN :.z � 00 PLAN 1 18 I� lope a / , n v 'r?r1 Ll Ala. 25DDI ' 60x70 LOT V/C/N/TY MAP .. 00 \\\ AO \ PROPOSED 8' / NOTES VIEW PROFILE #2 �p _ - - NATURAL ND PROPOSED GRADING A V A SIDEWALK , Boo- 760 - 680 00 _ _ _ \ \ \ F \ TO BE RELOCATED SINGLE FA MIL Y \ 7C EX. POWER POLE 760 Tz0 680 � i 760 V A O EX R/W b' t06 'F? ' ' Al � v A A EX, CURB &� o � ,T, o PITCH• ry /� �PROPOSED CURB �m R m 2"erNL 720 \ \\ \ \ \ PROPOSED R/W go \ \ -EXISTING 8"" SEWER \ \ ` / 0 �X, SIGNAGE TO BE RELOC9TED ,� 1R5 \�\ RL 680 •,,\ o 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680 .720 760 800. 840 880. 920 960. 1000 1040 1080 1120 \� o - �• / Ps �`' \�` Y _r ) y n \\ CONNECT 70 EX. 10" ACP WATER 8�`�p' ^ / •.:.- 90 35 / 5 \ \\ m l r�r� l Alii. 32D i EXISTING 8 SEWER R \ $ 9 VIEW PROFILE #3 PROPOSED GRADING A'\`BP V-9 )y r' BaoNATURAL PROPOSED MEDIAN p O,` &., / 15 RrN 5 \ r \ �\ dJ IYJ-J JAM, J� ✓� �J 7'0 -58 ^ w 800" 760 720 680 Summar N ¢ pPad--754A"ST. PLAN TYPE # OF BLDGS. p PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY S.F 6 DETACHED 60X70 30 PMSE OWAL POSED 5,295 31 PLAN 1 24 24 511 P "A" ST 491 SUBTOTAL 47 1009 SINGLE FAMILY 5,140 34 _-------- 11 4,857 CLUSTER UNITS XISTIN :.z � 00 PLAN 1 18 I� lope a /r --------------------------------------- 16 OPOSE " a 8 ST. .PLAN 3 29 PROPOSED 401 SUBTOTAL Pad=7 6.0'- MULTI -FAMILY UNITS 39 4,462 4-PLEX 2 8 40 ---- Lots - '16-18 SUBTOTAL 61 18 182 4,924 PR Lot 10 PROPOSED 5,159 ADE - 5,022 WON,' BLVD. 5,347 of 29 ' Pad + 7082- _- 5,731 46 5,683 - - 0 . 5,419 47 ----- EXI ---- TING G --- - ADE -z - -- ---- - WALL 5,911 26 _ a 50 m 27 15 631 -- 4645 28 6,414 Si 5,160 Lot 1 1 4,763 � i 760 V A O EX R/W b' t06 'F? ' ' Al � v A A EX, CURB &� o � ,T, o PITCH• ry /� �PROPOSED CURB �m R m 2"erNL 720 \ \\ \ \ \ PROPOSED R/W go \ \ -EXISTING 8"" SEWER \ \ ` / 0 �X, SIGNAGE TO BE RELOC9TED ,� 1R5 \�\ RL 680 •,,\ o 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680 .720 760 800. 840 880. 920 960. 1000 1040 1080 1120 \� o - �• / Ps �`' \�` Y _r ) y n \\ CONNECT 70 EX. 10" ACP WATER 8�`�p' ^ / •.:.- 90 35 / 5 \ \\ m l r�r� l Alii. 32D i EXISTING 8 SEWER R \ $ 9 VIEW PROFILE #3 PROPOSED GRADING A'\`BP V-9 )y r' BaoNATURAL PROPOSED MEDIAN p O,` &., / 15 RrN 5 \ r \ �\ dJ IYJ-J JAM, J� ✓� �J 7'0 -58 ^ w 800" 760 720 680 840 <O\ Z '. S`p1PM Y,yps1 , `�\• o> > s 3y8'\ \ Nei EX SIGNAGE TO BE = �-1 gym\ To BE RELOCATED 800 lrStl\i:l AIL- 331411y o S a �R' � 0 „+ � AA• ROti I v PROPOSED SIGNAL .QW o y ® s N • 1V• ps11 o i� cn� CONNECT TO EXISTING R" 7s6 10" s _ r 1\5 20� s. '�\ \♦ r P' 6 o �kd ". pgRpONDP 1� i 720 v W 65 - .� St IRA \ w .. ps12 . r �l (y ps1395 \ ----R \p WSMt BUILDING SUMMARY Vo 30" LANDS P s 7 .^ 9 2 P 10 g No � Summar I of Areas PLAN TYPE # OF BLDGS. # OF UNITS X OF TOTAL SINGLE FAMILY S.F 6 DETACHED 60X70 30 5,127 CLUSTER UNITS 5,295 31 PLAN 1 24 24 511 PLAN 2 23 23 491 SUBTOTAL 47 1009 SINGLE FAMILY 5,140 34 CONDOMINIUMS 11 4,857 CLUSTER UNITS 4,235 12 PLAN 1 18 18 251 PLAN 2 26 16 351 .PLAN 3 29 PROPOSED 401 SUBTOTAL Pad=7 6.0'- MULTI -FAMILY UNITS 39 4,462 4-PLEX 2 8 40 6-PLEX 9 a oe OW SUBTOTAL 61 18 OTAL # OF UNITS 182 4,924 PR POSED 43 5,159 20 5,022 "A" ST 5,347 of 29 30 45 5,297 _- 5,731 46 5,683 23 5,419 47 4,169 EXIS ING DE 4,808 25 MS WALL 5,911 26 _ a 50 5466 27 15 631 -- 4645 28 6,414 Si 5,160 29 1 4,763 GR I� hm p Lot 9 - (STING __----- -- ____ ____ --- -- ---_ --- -- Lr 04 S DI OND BAR . - - P OPOSE pa =727.5 BLVD. j Pates 25' Pa =7220* "e" ST. 1 1 PROP SED RE AINING WALL P OPOSE RETAIN NG WA PR L POSED GRADE m 840 <O\ Z '. S`p1PM Y,yps1 , `�\• o> > s 3y8'\ \ Nei EX SIGNAGE TO BE = �-1 gym\ To BE RELOCATED 800 lrStl\i:l AIL- 331411y o S a �R' � 0 „+ � AA• ROti I v PROPOSED SIGNAL .QW o y ® s N • 1V• ps11 o i� cn� CONNECT TO EXISTING R" 7s6 10" s _ r 1\5 20� s. '�\ \♦ r P' 6 o �kd ". pgRpONDP 1� i 720 v W 65 - .� St IRA \ w .. ps12 . r �l (y ps1395 \ ----R \p WSMt BUILDING SUMMARY Vo 30" LANDS P s 7 .^ 9 2 P 10 g No � Summar I of Areas PLAN TYPE # OF BLDGS. # OF UNITS X OF TOTAL SINGLE FAMILY S.F 6 DETACHED 60X70 30 5,127 CLUSTER UNITS 5,295 31 PLAN 1 24 24 511 PLAN 2 23 23 491 SUBTOTAL 47 1009 SINGLE FAMILY 5,140 34 CONDOMINIUMS 11 4,857 CLUSTER UNITS 4,235 12 PLAN 1 18 18 251 PLAN 2 26 16 351 .PLAN 3 29 29 401 SUBTOTAL 73 1001 MULTI -FAMILY UNITS 39 4,462 4-PLEX 2 8 40 6-PLEX 9 54 4,682 SUBTOTAL 61 18 OTAL # OF UNITS 182 4,924 1. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 8714-002-900, 8714-002-901, 8714-002-902, 8714-002-903 AND 8714-015-901. 2 EXISTING & PROPOSED ZONING: SITE D SPECIFIC PLAN 3. EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT 4, PROPOSED LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL 5. EXISTING & PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN: SPECIFIC PLAN, SITE D. 6. ALL STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND GRADING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DIAMOND BAR STANDARDS, ORDINANCES AND APPROVED MODIFICATIONS HERETO. 7. ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD SHALL BE ACCOMMODATED ON THE FINAL DESIGN, OR THEY SHALL BE EITHER QUITCLAIMED, ABANDONED OR RELOCATED TO THE SATISFACTION OF ALL INTERESTED PARTIES. DRAINAGE AND PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS NECESSARY TO SERVE THIS PROJECT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AND WITH THE UTILITY PURVEYORS. EXISTING STORM DRAIN EASEMENTS WILL BE ABANDONED DURING THE FINAL MAP PROCEDURES. & MULTI FAMILY BUILDING TO MEET NFPA 13 STANDARDS. 9. ESTIMATED EARTHWORK QUANTITIES: 415,500 CYS. CUT, 415,500 CYS. FILL. 10. SEWER SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT. 11. PER LA COUNTY FIRM PANEL 1880 OF 2350. 12. PRIVATE WATER QUALITY BAI TO BE MAINTAINED BY H.O.A. 13. LOTS 62 & 63 ARE TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR & MAINTAINED BY THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. 14. ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG DIAMOND BAR BLVD, BREA CANYON RD AND % 680 1' I 1 I - -- -. �3 A • ` • \ , \ PASADO ON. TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. "} - o ao 86 120 Iso zoo zao zao szo sso aoo aao aao szo 560 soo 640 sao 72o Iso aoo aao aeo azo TOTAL GROSS 247,342 S.F. _ $96 \ Ps - " "� - sl ' '� 2' ps1 .+ \\ \ ` - -- EX SIGNAGE TO BE -o '•' N P \ E 5.7 A0. 15 ALL TRASH IS INDIVIDUAL PICK UP BY WASTE MANAGEMENT. TRASH PICK UP .FOR / .Q h o ^ 5-(R <cy \ \ ✓ \ wP 5 AVERAGE GROSS 5,263 S.F.' 6' _ 1 i0 BE RELOCATED ry m o o \/ _ 0 Bm"0 \ \ q00 \ o j6 MSE LOTS 2 THROUGH 5 NEEDS i0 BE LOCATED ON "B" STREET. TRASH PICK UP FOR ,/ `"' a, o m - ` p§. _ �• .� s1 9 s1 \ \ l ps1 LOT i WILL BE ALONG THE LOOP ALLEY. 6" a i.6" Y ) _ r r RIGHT -OF WAY TO 'i p /`^ • P - CF.IPER /PLA N 6" 12" 12" J TO l vlr!'T Jva -T6r�r%I ���fJJ / OW BE DEDICATED i E - \ \ \ `° ""� p p p4 \ \ CITY OF DI D BAR � • 60 � ps1 \ 1 W5' LOTS 1-5 TO BE MAPPED FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES. - o e ,� \ c 1 ,,, 165 ✓� m � \ � \ P ps1 \\ � r \ R-3' PER PLAN / o / EX, 12" ACP WATER �5 1h"�•;. • Ps1 o a �, s� 0 w - \ �; 1 65 ` \• ` pW 17 STORM DRAIN SYSTEM TO BE PRIVATE. AO y UT/L/TY AGENC/E o / e / R _, - , 26 1°1p1°6 a9% \ P L9 Ot \\ •\�♦ Ps1 °' \� g• BN•nP SCHOOL DISTRICT: POSTAL SERVICE: R=1/2" R=1/2" FL R= 112* / l � _ En BE TO BE \ �/ OW ` - ' 0 'I WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WALNUT VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT USPS _. EXISTING TREES 70 BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED PER TREE SURVEY. el • '' ^ PROPOSED MEDIA / - / P \ �. s 16p • \ ���. ,. \ ps1 P \ \ ,. \ 1 271 S. BREA CANYON ROAD 880 SOUTH LEMON AVE. 1317 SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BLVD. - = ,' 413.P. w \ 1g15 • \• 0' 5 w4[ \ \ \\ WALNUT, CA 91789 WALNUT, CA 91789 DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 • :' __�� P09 POLE ? h i '� 2 / ( ) ( ) " Ex o , t . 1` - P° 9• \ 909 595-7554 eoD 275-6777 LOT SUMMARY �o .. TO BE RELO .. 10p �QI ♦ 14$ \ \ ♦ •. 6 PROPOSED SIGNAL l MoOlFica TION AT / PPROPosED R Rw -_ y , o o �//�'- . `�s q6\\ 1 ,, \797 A�o. wP♦s1 \ cs I i\ /\ ��� 60 N� N� 6r5 \ •\ \ Y 2 5P \\ I1fDEpWONE SERVICE: TRASH: SINGLE FAMILY HOMES) SEWER SERVICE: TRUNK LINES Lot No. Land Use LdB ACtBB 24DIAMOND BAR BLVD. WASTE MANAGEMENT INC. LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT &BREA CANYON RD. 1400 PHILLIPS RANCH RD. 13940 E. LIVE OAK AVE. 1955 WORKMAN MILL ROAD LOT1 MULTI -FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO 62 3.3 ^ L� /y �p GUM - - - - LOTS 2-5 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDOS 73 5.9 4' ROLLED CURB k GUTTER 6 CURB & GUI ,C^ ` s _--- / m m W / e p •`\ \1 pot 53 / 11 \ N y 1� A (O )NA, - 91766 (800) 266-7551 (562) 699-7411 _ Ex. R w � ° � \\ BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 WHITTIER, CA 90507 ED 47 NTS NTS � _ \+� \\ '�t" o 2 . \ 0 1 g \\ 800 483-5000 - _" -EX CCURB _ .3' rt 121\\ „ 8 FK \ ` ` 5 \ \ P �• LOTS 6-52 SINGLE FAMILY DETACH 5 7 --- /` ,150 - \ I \ \ 118• `' 1'R' :.. p,1 3 " ELECTRIC SERVICE: (EOR REFERENCE ONLY) (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) EX. POWER POLE '� - - / --- " P \` s \y c�R� ' �' ^' �\ Ps 0 \' 1 ae 60 \ TRASH: (FOR MULTI -FAMILY) SEWER SERVICE: (MAIN LINES) LOT 53-57 SLOPES/OPEN SPACE 5.7 70 BE RELOCATED -� ^- "'-- - i `\ `\ 1\ ?\� P q % �-( 154 °>\ o\ \ o, ♦ 5 ps1 9• / -\ \ SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. VALLEY VISTA INC. LOS ANGELES COUNTY OF PUBLIC WORKS - --� -' rR \ • q � % RE��. � ps1 w se I � 5'<y'L 800 CIENEGA AVE, 13940E LIVE OAK AVE. SEWER MAINTENANCE DISTRICT LOT 58 PRIVATE STREETS 4.0 SAN DIMAS, CA V91773 1 BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 900 FREEMONT LOT // o $0 683 BE _^ ip' Z° \ �'ro P (800) 655-4555 00) 266-7551 ALHAMB A - 1 3�8 RIGHY-OF-WAVY 680 \- ps V1 �' �\ ". 1b0 ri LOT 62 6 RAIN AGARDEN PARK/BASIN 1 0�� / (8 RA C 01 p 4 1 �FMP-4o oRM DRAIN , \\ \ ps1 11 V-6 0 31 1 a o 1 0%` Rar r GAS SERVICE: 3' BE DEDICATED r THE / I 6 V - _�! 1 CABLE N: p p / µ1EDTA FILTER LOW FLOW , _ P 11 w. 1 w 11 ' \ 1 3 _ ✓ / 3' BROW IiY OF DI MOND BAR a / NREATMEN B P � 2/ SISION 10 s1�1 ' �<`'' Ps ` , " • ` 6� 1 Psj6 o m L r' ON H. TYP SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. TIME WARNER LOT 63 PARK 0.9 GARAGE __, - � P \� �- - \ � � I I `A`•- _ / 1919 S. STATE COLLEGE BLVD. 0, DOOR / r _ \ CTURE m .. 6 \ I o \ c / rr ryq, rr 1041 E ROUTE 66 RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATED TO 0.5 / \ \ \ - pyc� \ l X106 a - s is (800) 427-220006 �I 1 \v 1 S �c r� GLENDORA, CA 91740 TOTAL THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 182 29.9 �. 2% MIN 25 �-'----- :. ;t bc ,. _. \ l \. ,_. Q � 4 • s1 3 r� r' i�� s oti+ I \\ p rr BENCH MARK - a /. 4' 1'L 1140± _ P' •F'a, I f _ I 1 rr � '<�%`• / ' oA $ - - o <t ; � ; � '. 1 "' ` ps1 Ps ` m qc -' . I I I .5 /,? ,,,,0 2 I. r. LOS ANGELES COUNTY BENCHMARK NO. G 5073 ELEVATION: 726.809 DATUM: NAVD 88, Ex. CAL BUILDINGS 2005 ADJUSTMENT / 135 _ I I o \ ' ` 1 - i 3' TOE ) P/ SCALE. 1 "=50, D EX R W /i r • - ,. r, 740 - I / 00/ �. / ✓ ! ^ 'La r DESCRIPTION: EX POWER POLE / / yC�OP 0\N /,- / / . - '- / b F ..Et• � 1 � 2 s :� ps `n ' 'yo i r DITCH, TYP • TY /NGS �i` R, ' �. z9 R o 0' CURB DETAIL AND UTILITIES PR POgED CURB F �/ p _r� Q ? J y' �l LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TAG IN EAST CURB OF DIAMOND KITS TO BE RELOCATED / / -� / ;n p0 ' ��� / / ,' / � " l - I � - /� %f' G \ -- / , r; ;� _ SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDO MULTI FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO BAR BLVD. 42.7 FEET EAST OF CENTERLINE AND 95 FEET NORTH OF CENTERLINE OF PROPOSED R/W / 10 sl .: ' g0E`'� i g •O ° r (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) / / /. / h /. , > P _ _--. /.., Ps o. \ b r ,% 110.2 - 111.0 CROOKED CREEK DRIVE. / �. / _ > 12 ? PEDESTRIAN l l / � / ^ Of o1 / 0 � � ° a � , m''z 1 1 ,38 (SSWALK / ep � / / � ' r 29. g5, \ -. � � Xr 107.7 41.5' 28.0' 41.5' CURB n / �p / "� / �A' / W >22 , s / \ O / A' i _;G'. X10 �'' A� �l`\\* q', 1 N'k r.r / - , \ cuRo LEGAL DESCRIPTION ( / A 10.0' W 26' r' ' \ - /5, >o - 9' 6 AQV_. r -c _ , ' r/ v r, 32' BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 9 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO / / / ,r e a :! 2 CP 5 / / r '' - �'ss,1b'51. // , / / 90 ` , Try'v� � rrr MIN. MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, GOUTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Ypr� o\S,gA•r ^.� 5- A1�' ',%'rY�• r % ,,:.1psI/ r-> B � �/4 �/ gp,0A7b =,� vv v vL.. .�P3', , 4' r / r' .r 5.5' 317" o w I 5.5 94.5' 2 D 7 DEVELOPMENT S TANDARDS L 38.8' BROW ARK PER SITE D SPECIFIC PLAN 5 / - e 14 7.5' 75' GFRE TRUCK s / 5.5' 4 134.5' DEVELOPMENT STANDARD/LOWMEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL REQUIRED PROVIDEDTURNING RADIUS DETAIL 4 XISTING NDERGROUND 10.0' MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS 200 182 Al MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE 60% 41.9% TYPICAL �- z°• 0 , . I ro 5.5' - \I - - /> 1 , ',_-- - MINIMUM YARD SETBACKS: FRONT YARD 10 FEET 10 FEET tAr REAR YARD 15 FEET 88 FEET*OFF-STREET PARK/NG QNTS p ,v ' 0/ 75. SIDE YARD INTERIOR 10 FEET ONE 10 FEET * SIDE 5 OTHER CURB 12,2' SIDE YARD STREET 10 FEET STREET 10 FEET 5 / SIDE 5 ON OTHER 5 FEET wNEEL9'- SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED (60X70) r LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS 15% 6. 3' To STOP \� // ^^m°/ \ g0 / /' ,' ,3 00' ` / �� r OITCw TYP PRIVATE LANDSCAPED AREAS 15% OS r i 1.. - 16° r'' / s. Tr'7r1Cr l2 )r/-Jrr- / // /(w /�', VQ0�- `70 �•' ;`/ j � /� , SS II I II II1 ?.ts�. m -% �^o\ I _ � �_ �„ o /41 /_ ry ^^ti. • `r \O. ^` or r 3r \ P16 010- X8680. 0�' 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK � COMMON LANDSCAPED AREAS 4'4% 18.8' TOTAL LANDSCAPED AREAS 59% .os >r.r A10 jr160 PARKING SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED ExsnNc RESIDENT PARKING 94 2 ENCLOSED 94 ESM7 5.0' -4 I 0'5.0' 700 SPACES PER UNT) 5.0GUEST PARKING 32 (1 SPACE PER 3 185 5.REQUIRED RESIDENT SPACES) ROW PARKING SINGLE FAMILY TYPICAL STREET SECT/ONS , RE 11. 2' 19.Q' CONDO/MULTI-FAMILY. DITCH, TYR 70.0' 19.8' RESIDENT PARKING 270 1 ENCLOSED SPACE PER 270 r SERVICE RO/D AND A _> 9 - O rr r� CT No, 2{JF�{� PEDESTRIA)V ACCESS ONLY - 1 BEDROOM UNIT, 2 ENCLOSED ' l EMERGENCY INGRE55/CGRE55 _ SPACES PER UNITS WITH 2 w ggqq OR MORE BEDROOMS) � <; / � � � j � � 'rl TCH, TYP Fe 0`)" E �`L /U/ GUEST PARKING 90 (1 SPACE PER 3 "11 19 3' TOE DITCH, TYP ��� \-@" `� r s REQUIRED RESIDENT SPACES) y . w ` 'k �. A �� b� til` fz' EASEM Nr AJ --- -. - I \ 1. ? / 8' EASEMENT 2' 15.0' 2' TOTAL PARKING TVP/CAL ON STREET \ I \ / y iq, 1q•p• p• OS' EASEMENT D.5• 2' 12. e' 2' RESIDENT PARKING. 364 364 PARALLEL PARK/NG / ^a-. m` / os' os' 0.5 _ 0.5' NTS. GUEST PARKING. 122 296 � 3d' LANDSCAPE SETBACK v Pv �� / EMERGENCY 90 \ \ I ' ,`' 2'1 OP 7/ ,2 111 2 1 2111 CURB INGRESS/EGRESS ` \ / i6o % / / \ pK z, 4,pi z, » DEVIATION TO SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SETBACKS REQUIRED 1�1 fd' / \ Z` 0 �4.Y SWALE SWALE Z.1 1 'Na"Y E ¢ NORTHERLY CL SOUTHERLY \ `s' �y \\ AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM) R/w BERM ° R/W R/W R/W R/W 46' R/W R RIGHT-OF-WAY TO SECTION A -A ENTRY - PORTION OF "A" STREET (PRIVATE) SECTION B -B ENTRY - PORTION OF "A" STREET (PRIVATE) 50' 50' 8' 42' 4' 35' 8' i M DI IN I 3• 2,07 2.0% 6' CURB & GUTTER CURB 6" CURB & GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK SECTION L -L EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) WALL 54R/W 54' I BTDEDICATEDPFND BAR _ ' �� ,'- / SECTION 1-1 SECTION J -J SECTION K -K 23.0' 23.0' _ 27'0' 27'0' 27'0' 27'01 I/ o. k EMERGENCY ACCESS ROAD SERVICE ACCESS ROAD PEDESTRIAWSERWaACGESS ROAD 36'LOT 55 I 14.0' 26' 14.0' I ---�-- I / ' S' _ (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) IfA' 1A' S'I A. /r\\ '4- 10 IS 1 IS I IU 4 2' - 8' -- Br - 2' ♦- ,.", i /. PKWY PKWY Y 22 .,y 2� l��RKI p0 "55 SIDEWALK SIDEW QP v\ a• 32'31.75'SIDEWALK SIDEWALK 5 , I, J w wCURB & CURB & CURB �� ¢ GUTTER GUTTER t1 TETE" FL u FL FL cQi FL GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER 4' 28' 4' 3' 28' 19' 2.875' 26' 2.875' SECTION C -C SECTION D -D NOR STREET LOCA( STREET MIN. TRAVEL MIN. MIN. TRAVEL PARKING MIN. TRAVEL MIN. 'A' STREET - LOCAL STREET 'A' STREET • LOCAL STREET (TAPER) PARKING BOTH SIDES \, �$ ~D$ \ 1 PARKING BOTH SIDES NO PARKING (PRIVATE) 4" RourD D" cuee d" ROLLED 4" ROLLED 0' CURB CURB CURB 6"CURB CURB (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) r. ..� \ SECTION F -F SECTION G -G SECTION H -H 4 r � PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS R/W R/w 2' 11 I 50'54' I 42' 8' 4' 42' I 8.1 1 S MI I 1 2 ~ I oz z1 I cu K e R 6" CURB & GI/TIER' 8' SIDEWALK \-6" CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED 8" SIDEWALK -8" FOE ALK SECTION L -L PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) 50' 150' 35' 4' 45' M DIA I Mon m- 3 CURB -6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER - SECTION )I EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD (PUBLIC) r�PROPOSED w R/W RWROl4Yfd7S RW iib' I 5o' 60, 8' 1 1 8' 35' 4' 63 �1 3' M DIA, 1 _ _ MP% 201 2.0% 2'1 nmm CUR6 L PROPOSED 6" CURB & GUTTER RETAINING WALL 6 CURB & CUTTER 8' SIDEWALK 5' SIDEWALK SECTION M -M PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) 14" 35' MEgIAN 1/ 6" CDR:; URB fi CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 3' SIDEWALK SECTION N -N EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) PROPOSED RIPROYFIIENIS If►1 r�PROPOSED MPROWWMT9 R�106' R/W 50' 1 11 56' 156' 1 f 8' 42' 4' 1 41' 1 B'l 3' I MDII 3• LN I I Z.1 an1 2. 09, I I PROPOS! CURB L RETAININ 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER B' SIDEWALK PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK SECTION N -N PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD (PUBLIC) PRIVATE STREET PRNATF STREET TYPICAL PRIVATE DRIVE (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) AND FIRE LANE (PRIVATE) F � PROPOSED IMPROVEMEMS PEW 8 •. R/W T y 92' RI✓ 40' 40' 40' 1 52' 8' 32' 32' 8' 1 1 1 20% 201 20% mwww _ m_ WALL L 6" CURB & GDM°R 6' CURB & GU FR 6- CURB & GUTTER i 8 SIDEWALK '-EXISNNG'8" SIDEWALK 6" CURB &GUTTER SECTION 0-0 SECTION 0-0 EXISTING BREA CANYON ROAD PROPOSED BREA GANYON ROAD (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) DENSITY SUMMARY Summar I of Areas CONDO Lot No. S.F Lot No. S.F 6 7,867 30 5,127 7 5,295 31 6,674 8 4,945 32 6,329 9 4,928 33 5,346 10 5,140 34 4,408 11 4,857 35 4,235 12 4,761 36 4,227 13 7,033 37 4,230 14 4,902 38 4,232 15 4,646 39 4,462 16 4,328 40 4,652 17 4,682 41 4,715 18 7,473 42 4,924 19 6,095 43 5,159 20 5,022 44 5,347 21 5,214 45 5,297 22 5,731 46 5,683 23 5,419 47 4,169 24 7,196 48 4,808 25 4,577 49 5,911 26 5 214 50 5466 27 15 631 51 4645 28 6,414 Si 5,160 29 1 4,763 1. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 8714-002-900, 8714-002-901, 8714-002-902, 8714-002-903 AND 8714-015-901. 2 EXISTING & PROPOSED ZONING: SITE D SPECIFIC PLAN 3. EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT 4, PROPOSED LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL 5. EXISTING & PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN: SPECIFIC PLAN, SITE D. 6. ALL STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND GRADING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DIAMOND BAR STANDARDS, ORDINANCES AND APPROVED MODIFICATIONS HERETO. 7. ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD SHALL BE ACCOMMODATED ON THE FINAL DESIGN, OR THEY SHALL BE EITHER QUITCLAIMED, ABANDONED OR RELOCATED TO THE SATISFACTION OF ALL INTERESTED PARTIES. DRAINAGE AND PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS NECESSARY TO SERVE THIS PROJECT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AND WITH THE UTILITY PURVEYORS. EXISTING STORM DRAIN EASEMENTS WILL BE ABANDONED DURING THE FINAL MAP PROCEDURES. & MULTI FAMILY BUILDING TO MEET NFPA 13 STANDARDS. 9. ESTIMATED EARTHWORK QUANTITIES: 415,500 CYS. CUT, 415,500 CYS. FILL. 10. SEWER SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT. 11. PER LA COUNTY FIRM PANEL 1880 OF 2350. 12. PRIVATE WATER QUALITY BAI TO BE MAINTAINED BY H.O.A. 13. LOTS 62 & 63 ARE TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR & MAINTAINED BY THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. 14. ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG DIAMOND BAR BLVD, BREA CANYON RD AND % 680 1' I 1 I - -- -. �3 A • ` • \ , \ PASADO ON. TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. "} - o ao 86 120 Iso zoo zao zao szo sso aoo aao aao szo 560 soo 640 sao 72o Iso aoo aao aeo azo TOTAL GROSS 247,342 S.F. _ $96 \ Ps - " "� - sl ' '� 2' ps1 .+ \\ \ ` - -- EX SIGNAGE TO BE -o '•' N P \ E 5.7 A0. 15 ALL TRASH IS INDIVIDUAL PICK UP BY WASTE MANAGEMENT. TRASH PICK UP .FOR / .Q h o ^ 5-(R <cy \ \ ✓ \ wP 5 AVERAGE GROSS 5,263 S.F.' 6' _ 1 i0 BE RELOCATED ry m o o \/ _ 0 Bm"0 \ \ q00 \ o j6 MSE LOTS 2 THROUGH 5 NEEDS i0 BE LOCATED ON "B" STREET. TRASH PICK UP FOR ,/ `"' a, o m - ` p§. _ �• .� s1 9 s1 \ \ l ps1 LOT i WILL BE ALONG THE LOOP ALLEY. 6" a i.6" Y ) _ r r RIGHT -OF WAY TO 'i p /`^ • P - CF.IPER /PLA N 6" 12" 12" J TO l vlr!'T Jva -T6r�r%I ���fJJ / OW BE DEDICATED i E - \ \ \ `° ""� p p p4 \ \ CITY OF DI D BAR � • 60 � ps1 \ 1 W5' LOTS 1-5 TO BE MAPPED FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES. - o e ,� \ c 1 ,,, 165 ✓� m � \ � \ P ps1 \\ � r \ R-3' PER PLAN / o / EX, 12" ACP WATER �5 1h"�•;. • Ps1 o a �, s� 0 w - \ �; 1 65 ` \• ` pW 17 STORM DRAIN SYSTEM TO BE PRIVATE. AO y UT/L/TY AGENC/E o / e / R _, - , 26 1°1p1°6 a9% \ P L9 Ot \\ •\�♦ Ps1 °' \� g• BN•nP SCHOOL DISTRICT: POSTAL SERVICE: R=1/2" R=1/2" FL R= 112* / l � _ En BE TO BE \ �/ OW ` - ' 0 'I WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WALNUT VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT USPS _. EXISTING TREES 70 BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED PER TREE SURVEY. el • '' ^ PROPOSED MEDIA / - / P \ �. s 16p • \ ���. ,. \ ps1 P \ \ ,. \ 1 271 S. BREA CANYON ROAD 880 SOUTH LEMON AVE. 1317 SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BLVD. - = ,' 413.P. w \ 1g15 • \• 0' 5 w4[ \ \ \\ WALNUT, CA 91789 WALNUT, CA 91789 DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 • :' __�� P09 POLE ? h i '� 2 / ( ) ( ) " Ex o , t . 1` - P° 9• \ 909 595-7554 eoD 275-6777 LOT SUMMARY �o .. TO BE RELO .. 10p �QI ♦ 14$ \ \ ♦ •. 6 PROPOSED SIGNAL l MoOlFica TION AT / PPROPosED R Rw -_ y , o o �//�'- . `�s q6\\ 1 ,, \797 A�o. wP♦s1 \ cs I i\ /\ ��� 60 N� N� 6r5 \ •\ \ Y 2 5P \\ I1fDEpWONE SERVICE: TRASH: SINGLE FAMILY HOMES) SEWER SERVICE: TRUNK LINES Lot No. Land Use LdB ACtBB 24DIAMOND BAR BLVD. WASTE MANAGEMENT INC. LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT &BREA CANYON RD. 1400 PHILLIPS RANCH RD. 13940 E. LIVE OAK AVE. 1955 WORKMAN MILL ROAD LOT1 MULTI -FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO 62 3.3 ^ L� /y �p GUM - - - - LOTS 2-5 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDOS 73 5.9 4' ROLLED CURB k GUTTER 6 CURB & GUI ,C^ ` s _--- / m m W / e p •`\ \1 pot 53 / 11 \ N y 1� A (O )NA, - 91766 (800) 266-7551 (562) 699-7411 _ Ex. R w � ° � \\ BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 WHITTIER, CA 90507 ED 47 NTS NTS � _ \+� \\ '�t" o 2 . \ 0 1 g \\ 800 483-5000 - _" -EX CCURB _ .3' rt 121\\ „ 8 FK \ ` ` 5 \ \ P �• LOTS 6-52 SINGLE FAMILY DETACH 5 7 --- /` ,150 - \ I \ \ 118• `' 1'R' :.. p,1 3 " ELECTRIC SERVICE: (EOR REFERENCE ONLY) (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) EX. POWER POLE '� - - / --- " P \` s \y c�R� ' �' ^' �\ Ps 0 \' 1 ae 60 \ TRASH: (FOR MULTI -FAMILY) SEWER SERVICE: (MAIN LINES) LOT 53-57 SLOPES/OPEN SPACE 5.7 70 BE RELOCATED -� ^- "'-- - i `\ `\ 1\ ?\� P q % �-( 154 °>\ o\ \ o, ♦ 5 ps1 9• / -\ \ SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. VALLEY VISTA INC. LOS ANGELES COUNTY OF PUBLIC WORKS - --� -' rR \ • q � % RE��. � ps1 w se I � 5'<y'L 800 CIENEGA AVE, 13940E LIVE OAK AVE. SEWER MAINTENANCE DISTRICT LOT 58 PRIVATE STREETS 4.0 SAN DIMAS, CA V91773 1 BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 900 FREEMONT LOT // o $0 683 BE _^ ip' Z° \ �'ro P (800) 655-4555 00) 266-7551 ALHAMB A - 1 3�8 RIGHY-OF-WAVY 680 \- ps V1 �' �\ ". 1b0 ri LOT 62 6 RAIN AGARDEN PARK/BASIN 1 0�� / (8 RA C 01 p 4 1 �FMP-4o oRM DRAIN , \\ \ ps1 11 V-6 0 31 1 a o 1 0%` Rar r GAS SERVICE: 3' BE DEDICATED r THE / I 6 V - _�! 1 CABLE N: p p / µ1EDTA FILTER LOW FLOW , _ P 11 w. 1 w 11 ' \ 1 3 _ ✓ / 3' BROW IiY OF DI MOND BAR a / NREATMEN B P � 2/ SISION 10 s1�1 ' �<`'' Ps ` , " • ` 6� 1 Psj6 o m L r' ON H. TYP SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. TIME WARNER LOT 63 PARK 0.9 GARAGE __, - � P \� �- - \ � � I I `A`•- _ / 1919 S. STATE COLLEGE BLVD. 0, DOOR / r _ \ CTURE m .. 6 \ I o \ c / rr ryq, rr 1041 E ROUTE 66 RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATED TO 0.5 / \ \ \ - pyc� \ l X106 a - s is (800) 427-220006 �I 1 \v 1 S �c r� GLENDORA, CA 91740 TOTAL THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 182 29.9 �. 2% MIN 25 �-'----- :. ;t bc ,. _. \ l \. ,_. Q � 4 • s1 3 r� r' i�� s oti+ I \\ p rr BENCH MARK - a /. 4' 1'L 1140± _ P' •F'a, I f _ I 1 rr � '<�%`• / ' oA $ - - o <t ; � ; � '. 1 "' ` ps1 Ps ` m qc -' . I I I .5 /,? ,,,,0 2 I. r. LOS ANGELES COUNTY BENCHMARK NO. G 5073 ELEVATION: 726.809 DATUM: NAVD 88, Ex. CAL BUILDINGS 2005 ADJUSTMENT / 135 _ I I o \ ' ` 1 - i 3' TOE ) P/ SCALE. 1 "=50, D EX R W /i r • - ,. r, 740 - I / 00/ �. / ✓ ! ^ 'La r DESCRIPTION: EX POWER POLE / / yC�OP 0\N /,- / / . - '- / b F ..Et• � 1 � 2 s :� ps `n ' 'yo i r DITCH, TYP • TY /NGS �i` R, ' �. z9 R o 0' CURB DETAIL AND UTILITIES PR POgED CURB F �/ p _r� Q ? J y' �l LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TAG IN EAST CURB OF DIAMOND KITS TO BE RELOCATED / / -� / ;n p0 ' ��� / / ,' / � " l - I � - /� %f' G \ -- / , r; ;� _ SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDO MULTI FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO BAR BLVD. 42.7 FEET EAST OF CENTERLINE AND 95 FEET NORTH OF CENTERLINE OF PROPOSED R/W / 10 sl .: ' g0E`'� i g •O ° r (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) / / /. / h /. , > P _ _--. /.., Ps o. \ b r ,% 110.2 - 111.0 CROOKED CREEK DRIVE. / �. / _ > 12 ? PEDESTRIAN l l / � / ^ Of o1 / 0 � � ° a � , m''z 1 1 ,38 (SSWALK / ep � / / � ' r 29. g5, \ -. � � Xr 107.7 41.5' 28.0' 41.5' CURB n / �p / "� / �A' / W >22 , s / \ O / A' i _;G'. X10 �'' A� �l`\\* q', 1 N'k r.r / - , \ cuRo LEGAL DESCRIPTION ( / A 10.0' W 26' r' ' \ - /5, >o - 9' 6 AQV_. r -c _ , ' r/ v r, 32' BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 9 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO / / / ,r e a :! 2 CP 5 / / r '' - �'ss,1b'51. // , / / 90 ` , Try'v� � rrr MIN. MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, GOUTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Ypr� o\S,gA•r ^.� 5- A1�' ',%'rY�• r % ,,:.1psI/ r-> B � �/4 �/ gp,0A7b =,� vv v vL.. .�P3', , 4' r / r' .r 5.5' 317" o w I 5.5 94.5' 2 D 7 DEVELOPMENT S TANDARDS L 38.8' BROW ARK PER SITE D SPECIFIC PLAN 5 / - e 14 7.5' 75' GFRE TRUCK s / 5.5' 4 134.5' DEVELOPMENT STANDARD/LOWMEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL REQUIRED PROVIDEDTURNING RADIUS DETAIL 4 XISTING NDERGROUND 10.0' MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS 200 182 Al MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE 60% 41.9% TYPICAL �- z°• 0 , . I ro 5.5' - \I - - /> 1 , ',_-- - MINIMUM YARD SETBACKS: FRONT YARD 10 FEET 10 FEET tAr REAR YARD 15 FEET 88 FEET*OFF-STREET PARK/NG QNTS p ,v ' 0/ 75. SIDE YARD INTERIOR 10 FEET ONE 10 FEET * SIDE 5 OTHER CURB 12,2' SIDE YARD STREET 10 FEET STREET 10 FEET 5 / SIDE 5 ON OTHER 5 FEET wNEEL9'- SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED (60X70) r LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS 15% 6. 3' To STOP \� // ^^m°/ \ g0 / /' ,' ,3 00' ` / �� r OITCw TYP PRIVATE LANDSCAPED AREAS 15% OS r i 1.. - 16° r'' / s. Tr'7r1Cr l2 )r/-Jrr- / // /(w /�', VQ0�- `70 �•' ;`/ j � /� , SS II I II II1 ?.ts�. m -% �^o\ I _ � �_ �„ o /41 /_ ry ^^ti. • `r \O. ^` or r 3r \ P16 010- X8680. 0�' 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK � COMMON LANDSCAPED AREAS 4'4% 18.8' TOTAL LANDSCAPED AREAS 59% .os >r.r A10 jr160 PARKING SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED ExsnNc RESIDENT PARKING 94 2 ENCLOSED 94 ESM7 5.0' -4 I 0'5.0' 700 SPACES PER UNT) 5.0GUEST PARKING 32 (1 SPACE PER 3 185 5.REQUIRED RESIDENT SPACES) ROW PARKING SINGLE FAMILY TYPICAL STREET SECT/ONS , RE 11. 2' 19.Q' CONDO/MULTI-FAMILY. DITCH, TYR 70.0' 19.8' RESIDENT PARKING 270 1 ENCLOSED SPACE PER 270 r SERVICE RO/D AND A _> 9 - O rr r� CT No, 2{JF�{� PEDESTRIA)V ACCESS ONLY - 1 BEDROOM UNIT, 2 ENCLOSED ' l EMERGENCY INGRE55/CGRE55 _ SPACES PER UNITS WITH 2 w ggqq OR MORE BEDROOMS) � <; / � � � j � � 'rl TCH, TYP Fe 0`)" E �`L /U/ GUEST PARKING 90 (1 SPACE PER 3 "11 19 3' TOE DITCH, TYP ��� \-@" `� r s REQUIRED RESIDENT SPACES) y . w ` 'k �. A �� b� til` fz' EASEM Nr AJ --- -. - I \ 1. ? / 8' EASEMENT 2' 15.0' 2' TOTAL PARKING TVP/CAL ON STREET \ I \ / y iq, 1q•p• p• OS' EASEMENT D.5• 2' 12. e' 2' RESIDENT PARKING. 364 364 PARALLEL PARK/NG / ^a-. m` / os' os' 0.5 _ 0.5' NTS. GUEST PARKING. 122 296 � 3d' LANDSCAPE SETBACK v Pv �� / EMERGENCY 90 \ \ I ' ,`' 2'1 OP 7/ ,2 111 2 1 2111 CURB INGRESS/EGRESS ` \ / i6o % / / \ pK z, 4,pi z, » DEVIATION TO SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SETBACKS REQUIRED 1�1 fd' / \ Z` 0 �4.Y SWALE SWALE Z.1 1 'Na"Y E ¢ NORTHERLY CL SOUTHERLY \ `s' �y \\ AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM) R/w BERM ° R/W R/W R/W R/W 46' R/W R RIGHT-OF-WAY TO SECTION A -A ENTRY - PORTION OF "A" STREET (PRIVATE) SECTION B -B ENTRY - PORTION OF "A" STREET (PRIVATE) 50' 50' 8' 42' 4' 35' 8' i M DI IN I 3• 2,07 2.0% 6' CURB & GUTTER CURB 6" CURB & GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK SECTION L -L EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) WALL 54R/W 54' I BTDEDICATEDPFND BAR _ ' �� ,'- / SECTION 1-1 SECTION J -J SECTION K -K 23.0' 23.0' _ 27'0' 27'0' 27'0' 27'01 I/ o. k EMERGENCY ACCESS ROAD SERVICE ACCESS ROAD PEDESTRIAWSERWaACGESS ROAD 36'LOT 55 I 14.0' 26' 14.0' I ---�-- I / ' S' _ (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) IfA' 1A' S'I A. /r\\ '4- 10 IS 1 IS I IU 4 2' - 8' -- Br - 2' ♦- ,.", i /. PKWY PKWY Y 22 .,y 2� l��RKI p0 "55 SIDEWALK SIDEW QP v\ a• 32'31.75'SIDEWALK SIDEWALK 5 , I, J w wCURB & CURB & CURB �� ¢ GUTTER GUTTER t1 TETE" FL u FL FL cQi FL GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER 4' 28' 4' 3' 28' 19' 2.875' 26' 2.875' SECTION C -C SECTION D -D NOR STREET LOCA( STREET MIN. TRAVEL MIN. MIN. TRAVEL PARKING MIN. TRAVEL MIN. 'A' STREET - LOCAL STREET 'A' STREET • LOCAL STREET (TAPER) PARKING BOTH SIDES \, �$ ~D$ \ 1 PARKING BOTH SIDES NO PARKING (PRIVATE) 4" RourD D" cuee d" ROLLED 4" ROLLED 0' CURB CURB CURB 6"CURB CURB (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) r. ..� \ SECTION F -F SECTION G -G SECTION H -H 4 r � PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS R/W R/w 2' 11 I 50'54' I 42' 8' 4' 42' I 8.1 1 S MI I 1 2 ~ I oz z1 I cu K e R 6" CURB & GI/TIER' 8' SIDEWALK \-6" CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED 8" SIDEWALK -8" FOE ALK SECTION L -L PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) 50' 150' 35' 4' 45' M DIA I Mon m- 3 CURB -6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER - SECTION )I EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD (PUBLIC) r�PROPOSED w R/W RWROl4Yfd7S RW iib' I 5o' 60, 8' 1 1 8' 35' 4' 63 �1 3' M DIA, 1 _ _ MP% 201 2.0% 2'1 nmm CUR6 L PROPOSED 6" CURB & GUTTER RETAINING WALL 6 CURB & CUTTER 8' SIDEWALK 5' SIDEWALK SECTION M -M PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) 14" 35' MEgIAN 1/ 6" CDR:; URB fi CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 3' SIDEWALK SECTION N -N EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) PROPOSED RIPROYFIIENIS If►1 r�PROPOSED MPROWWMT9 R�106' R/W 50' 1 11 56' 156' 1 f 8' 42' 4' 1 41' 1 B'l 3' I MDII 3• LN I I Z.1 an1 2. 09, I I PROPOS! CURB L RETAININ 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER B' SIDEWALK PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK SECTION N -N PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD (PUBLIC) PRIVATE STREET PRNATF STREET TYPICAL PRIVATE DRIVE (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) AND FIRE LANE (PRIVATE) F � PROPOSED IMPROVEMEMS PEW 8 •. R/W T y 92' RI✓ 40' 40' 40' 1 52' 8' 32' 32' 8' 1 1 1 20% 201 20% mwww _ m_ WALL L 6" CURB & GDM°R 6' CURB & GU FR 6- CURB & GUTTER i 8 SIDEWALK '-EXISNNG'8" SIDEWALK 6" CURB &GUTTER SECTION 0-0 SECTION 0-0 EXISTING BREA CANYON ROAD PROPOSED BREA GANYON ROAD (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) DENSITY SUMMARY NUMBER OF UNITS MULTI -FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO NUMBER AREA OF UNITS DENSITY OF UNITS (ACRES) 57 (DUTACRO 62 3.3 1&8 DENSITY SUMMARY NUMBER OF UNITS SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED (60x70) NUMBER AREA DENSITY OF UNITS (ACRES) (DUiACRO 47 57 82 DENSITY SUMMARY NUMBER OF UNITS SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDO NUMBER AREA GUEST (V3 PER UNIT) DENSITY OF UNITS (ACRES) TOTALS 47 (DU/ACRE) 73 5.9 185 124 PARKING SUMMARY - SINGLE FAMILY NUMBER OF UNITS REQUIRED PROVIDED COVERED (2 PER UNFD GUEST (V3 PER UNIT) COVERED (2 PER UNIT) GUEST' TOTALS 47 94 32 94 185 INCLUDES ON -STREET PARKING AND 2 GUEST SPACES IN DRIVEWAY PARKING SUMMARY - MULTI -FAMILY NUMBER OF UNITS REQUIRED PROVIDED COVERED (2 PER UI GUEST (1/3 PER UNIT) COVERED (Z PER UNIT) GUEST TOTALS 135 270 90 270 105 MAP DATE IDENTIFIER MIC OF APAT CWNCE i THIS IMV 07/30/13 BY: LP Ms or T"s 01 09 19 Z 13 7.2213 FIRE AND PLANNING LP DATE REVISION BY DATE Jufy 22, 2013 FEET W.O. 0 30 60 120 GROSS AREA 29.7 AC. t 0 1/2 1 2 CONTOUR INTERVAL 5' INCHES TOTAL LOTS 63 PREPARED FOR. PREPARED BY - 0 1111111111 Y--0WNER T T LEN NAIR0 'X -A Im 25 ENTERPRISE \ ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656 v11r \i (949) 349-8100 Z Q HUNSAKER 6r. ASSOCIATES a I R V I N E I N C 1 I- ENONE RING - SURVEYING !n Three Hughs IMA CA WfiV FX (999) 5810]59 PH: (949) aflY1I11R SITE PLAN I VEST/NG TENTATIVE TRACT 72295 F:\0718\Planning\CA_Project\SITE PLAN\0718P_SITE PLAN. dwg Agenda # 8 .2 Meeting Date Dec. 17, 2013 CITY COUNCIL xa �9 AGENDA REPORT el TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council VIA: James DeStefano, City Manlo TITLE: City Council Appointments RECOMMENDATION: Appoint and Adopt. FINANCIAL SUMMARY: No Fiscal Impact. BACKGROUND: On a yearly basis following the reorganization of the City Council, the newly selected Mayor has the opportunity to appoint Council Members to serve as delegates and alternates to the local and regional organizations of which the City is a member, including the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG). Pursuant to the bylaws of the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments, a resolution must be adopted to formalize the new appointments. Resolution No. 2013 -XX is attached, confirming the appointments. In addition to making appointments to local and regional organizations like SGVCOG, the Mayor must appoint City Council Members to Council -established standing committees (see attached list). This year, it is proposed that the Council create a standing Audit Committee consisting of the appointed Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem. The Audit Committee is established to provide oversight of the annual independent audit, including the financial reporting and internal controls relevant to the reporting process. PR PARED Y: Tommo Cribbins, City Clerk Attachment: Organization List Resolution No. 2013 -XX REVIEWE Y: David Doy , Asst. y Manager RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -XX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR CONFIRMING THE APPOINTMENT OF SPECIFIC REPRESENTATIVES TO THE SAN GABRIEL VALLEY COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS A. RECITALS WHEREAS, the City of Diamond Bar has executed the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments Joint Powers Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Joint Powers Agreement for the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments requires each member city to appoint a Delegate Government Board Representative and an Alternate Governing Board Representative to represent the City in conducting the affairs of the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments; and WHEREAS, has been designated to serve as the "delegate" from the City to serve as the Governing Board Representative with the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments; and WHEREAS, has been designated to serve as the "alternate" Governing Board Representative to the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments. B. RESOLUTION. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar appoints to serve as the City of Diamond Bar's delegate to the Governing Board of the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments. SECTION 2. That the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar appoints to serve as the City of Diamond Bar's alternate delegate to the Governing Board of the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments. SECTION 3. That the individuals designated in this resolution serve until replaced by resolution or until they become ineligible pursuant to the terms of the Joint Powers Agreement of the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments. SECTION 4. That the City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. SECTION 5. That a certified copy of the resolution be circulated to the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 17th Day of December, 2013. Carol Herrera, Mayor I, Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the 17th day of December, 2013, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS Effective December COMMITTEE California Contract Cities Association DELEGATE/ALTERNATE (Board of Directors membership —CCC -4 bylaws specify that voting delegate and alternate needs to be any City elected official) Sam Olivito, Exec. Dir., 11027 Downey Ave., Downey, CA 90241, 562-622-5533, FAX 562-622- 9555. Meets 3`d Wednesday of each month at 6:30 p.m. (social hour), 7:30 p.m., dinner, various restaurant locations of host City. Reservations required. (Board of Directors membership — Delegate and alternate must be elected officials) Foothill Transit Board Doran Barnes, Exec. Dir., 100 S. Vincent Ave., Suite 200, West Covina, CA 91790, 626-967-2274, FAX 626-915-1143 Meets 4th Friday of each month at 8:00 a.m. at above address. Four -Corners Transportation Policy Group Carol Herrera, City of Diamond Bar, Chairman - Meets as needed. Greater Los Angeles County Vector Control District (Appointment of Trustee — does not have to be an elected official. Appointment is for 2 -year term) 12545 Florence Ave., Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670, 562-944-9656, FAX 562-944-7976 Meets 2nd Thursday at address above at 7:00 p.m. Joint Powers Insurance Authority (Board ofDirectors membership — Delegate must be any elected official appointed by the Mayor. Alternate may be elected official or staff member) Jon Shull, Executive Director, 8081 Moody St., La Palma, CA 90623, 800-229-2343, FAX 562- 860-4992 General Board Committee meets annually each July - location to be announced. Rev. December 5, 2013 L.A. County Sanitation District No. 21 (Board ofDirectors Membership —Mayor is automatically delegate per Health & Safety Code Sec. 4730.1 Alternate is required to be an elected official whose appointment is confirmed by City Council action) Grace Chan, Chief Engineer & General Manager, 1955 Workman Mill Rd., Whittier CA 90607-4998 Mailing: P.O. Box 4998, Whittier CA 90607-4998, 562-699-7411 x1500, FAX 562-908-4255 Meets 4th Wednesday of each month at 1:30 p.m. at District Office. L.A. County City Selection Committee (Board ofDirectors membership - Mayor andMayor Pro Tem are automatically designated as Delegate and Alternate, respectively) Sachi A. Hamai, Executive Officer, Board of Supervisors, Kenneth Hahn Hall of Administration, Room 383, 500 W. Temple St., Los Angeles, CA 90012, 213-974-1401, FAX 213-620-0636 Meets: After the League of California Cities - L.A. County Division Meeting - (Approx. 8:30 p.m.) League of California Cities - L.A. County Division (Board ofDirectors membership—Delegate and alternate must be elected off cials. Mayor does not have to be appointed) Jennifer Quan, P.O. Box 1444, Monrovia, CA 91017, 626-786-5142, FAX 626-301-0387 Meets 1stThursday of each month at 6:30 p.m. at various locations. San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (Board of Directors membership — Delegate and alternate must be elected officials. Adoption of a resolution confirming the appointment is usually made at the next City Council meeting) Andrea Travis Miller, Executive Director, 1000 S. Fremont Ave., Unit 42, Building A-10, Suite 10210, Alhambra, CA 91803, 626-457-1800, FAX 626-457-1285 Meets 3`d Thursday of each month at 6:00 p.m. at various locations. Executive Session 5:00 p.m. Rev. December 5, 2013 Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) (Board of Directors membership — Delegate and alternate must be elected officials but there is no requirement that delegate be the Mayor) (Appointment to SCAG District 37 is not contingent on appointment as delegate or alternate by the City) Main Office, 818 W. 7th St., 12th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90017, 213-236-1800, FAX 213-236 1825 General Assembly meets annually each March - location to be announced. Tres Hermanos Conservation Authority c/o City of Chino Hills, Michael Fleager, Executive Director (Board of Directors Membership — Council may appoint anyone) Wildlife Corridor Conservation Authority (WCCA) (Board of Directors Membership — Council may appoint anyone) Joseph Edmiston, Executive Director, Contact Judi Tamasi 5810 Ramirez Canyon Rd., Malibu, CA 90265, 310-589-3230 x121, FAX 310 -589 - Wildlife Corridor Conservation Authority Advisory Appointed by Council for 2 years. Terms expire —David De Mers July 2010 — terms expire in July of even numbered years). CITY COUNCIL STANDING COMMITTEES Economic Development (Meets quarterly) Neighborhood Improvement (Meets quarterly) Public Safety Committee (Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem meets quarterly) City Council Goals/City Manager Evaluation Industry East Development Advisory Committee Legislative LLAD Council Sub -Committee Sphere of Influence/Annexation Rev. December 5, 2013 De Mers CITY COUNCIL LIAISON Chamber of Commerce D.B. Community Foundation Library PUSD/City Senior Citizen WVUSD/City Rev. December 5, 2013 CITY COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS Effective December COMMITTEE California Contract Cities Association DELEGATE/ALTERNATE Lyons/Tye (Board of Directors membership—COCA bylaws specify that voting delegate and alternate needs to be any City elected official) Sam Olivito, Exec. Dir., 11027 Downey Ave., Downey, CA 90241, 562-622-5533, FAX 562-622- 9555. Meets 3d Wednesday of each month at 6:30 p.m. (social hour), 7:30 p.m., dinner, various restaurant locations of host City. Reservations required. (Board of Directors membership — Delegate and alternate must be elected officials) Foothill Transit Board Herrera/Lyons Doran Barnes, Exec. Dir., 100 S. Vincent Ave., Suite 200, West Covina, CA 91790, 626-967-2274, FAX 626-915-1143 Meets 4th Friday of each month at 8:00 a.m. at above address. Four -Corners Transportation Policy Group Herrera Carol Herrera, City of Diamond Bar, Chairman - Meets as needed. Greater Los Angeles County Vector Control District Tye/Tanaka (Appointment of Trustee — does not have to be an elected official. Appointment is for 2 -year term) 12545 Florence Ave., Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670, 562-944-9656, FAX 562-944-7976 Meets 2nd Thursday at address above at 7:00 p.m. Joint Powers Insurance Authority Tye/DeStefano (Board of Directors membership—Delegate must be any elected official appointed by the Mayor. Alternate maybe elected of or staff member) Jon Shull, Executive Director, 8081 Moody St., La Palma, CA 90623, 800-229-2343, FAX 562- 860-4992 General Board Committee meets annually each July - location to be announced. Rev. December 17, 2013 L.A. County Sanitation District No. 21 Herrera/Tye (Board of Directors Membership— Mayor is automatically delegate per Health & Safety Code Sec. 4730.1. Alternate is required to be an elected official whose appointment is confirmed by City Council action) Grace Chan, Chief Engineer & General Manager, 1955 Workman Mill Rd., Whittier CA 90607-4998 Mailing: P.O. Box 4998, Whittier CA 90607-4998, 562-699-7411 x1500, FAX 562-908-4255 Meets 4th Wednesday of each month at 1:30 p.m. at District Office. L.A. County City Selection Committee Herrera/Tye (Board of Directors membership - Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem are automatically designated as Delegate and Alternate, respectively) Sachi A. Hamai, Executive Officer, Board of Supervisors, Kenneth Hahn Hall of Administration, Room 383, 500 W. Temple St., Los Angeles, CA 90012, 213-974-1401, FAX 213-620-0636 Meets: After the League of California Cities - L.A. County Division Meeting - (Approx. 8:30 p.m.) League of California Cities - L.A. County Division Tanaka/Chang (Board ofDirectors membership—Delegate and alternate must be elected officials. Mayor does not have to be appointed) Jennifer Quan, P.O. Box 1444, Monrovia, CA 91017, 626-786-5142, FAX 626-301-0387 Meets 1stThursdav of each month at 6:30 p.m. at various locations. San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments Herrera/Lyons (Board of Directors membership — Delegate and alternate must be elected officials. Adoption of a resolution confirming the appointment is usually made at the next City Council meeting) Andrea Travis Miller, Executive Director, 1000 S. Fremont Ave., Unit 42, Building A-10, Suite 10210, Alhambra, CA 91803, 626-457-1800, FAX 626-457-1285 Meets 3rd Thursday of each month at 6:00 p.m. at various locations. Executive Session 5:00 p.m. Rev. becember 17, 2013 Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Lyons/Chang (Board of Directors membership — Delegate and alternate must be elected officials but there is no requirement that delegate be the Mayor) (Appointment to SCAG District 37 is not contingent on appointment as delegate or alternate by the City) Main Office, 818 W. 7th St., 12th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90017, 213-236-1800, FAX 213-236 1825 General Assembly meets annually each March - location to be announced. Tres Hermanos Conservation Authority Herrera/Lyons c/o City of Chino Hills, Michael Fleager, Executive Director (Board of Directors Membership — Council may appoint anyone) Wildlife Corridor Conservation Authority (WCCA) Tanaka/Chang (Board of Directors Membership — Council may appoint anyone) Joseph Edmiston, Executive Director, Contact Judi Tamasi 5810 Ramirez Canyon Rd., Malibu, CA 90265, 310-589-3230 x121, FAX 310 -589 - Wildlife Corridor Conservation Authority Advisory De Mers Appointed by Council for 2 years. Terms expire —David De Mers July 2010 — terms expire in July of even numbered years). CITY COUNCIL STANDING COMMITTEES Economic Development (Meets quarterly) Herrera/Lyons Neighborhood Improvement (Meets quarterly) Fanaka/Lyons Public Safety Committee (Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem meets quarterly) Herrera/Tye City Council Goals/City Manager Evaluation Herrera/Tye Industry East Development Advisory Committee Herrera/Tye Legislative Herrera/Chang LLAD Council Sub -Committee Herrera/Lyons Sphere of Influence/Annexation HerreralTye Rev, December 15, 2013 CITY COUNCIL LIAISON Chamber of Commerce D.B. Community Foundation Library PUSD/City Senior Citizen WVUSD/City Rc, D .... bc_ 17, 2013 Gang/Tanaka Chang/Tanaka Chang/Tanaka Chang/Lyons Tanaka/Chang Herrera/Tye C, K VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: FROM: ADDRESS: ORGANIZATION: AGENDA#/SUBJECT: CITY CLERK DATE: a, 00 lo` I ry _PHONE:p Fj lk, l oiyw esA` 5 expect to address the Council on the subject agenda/subject item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. Signature This document is a public record subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act. VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL. TO: CITY CLERK 4axk FROM: DATE: _ ADDRESS: —D— PHONE: ORGANIZATION: VV I AGENDA#/SUBJECT: %9� FF 27-% q 7 I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda/subject item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. k� Signature This document is a public record subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act. G9s" VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK FROM: ADDRESS: ORGANIZATION: (edE SL`h, DATE: IZ�t�Ii3 a7) r +sa�resav �, e3��, PHONE: L enhr� AGENDA#/SUBJECT: S?L I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda/subject item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. Signature This document is a public record subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act. lT I i Irl I ' 1 llla jygg VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK FROM: E, ll FI (Jt___ `V-yV0)_ /'fid), lkff' < DATE: %i-17_1.3 ADDRESS: 7 3�� i -J1.) win c� �4 c� �I v J PHONE: �' f d) e6 ORGANIZATION: AGENDA#/SUBJECT: y.l CoQ C I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda/subject item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. Signature This document is a public record subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act, T ass` VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK DATE: F FROM: 1/? l ADDRESS: 7f C-G�rr�) f/ - PHONE: ORGANIZATION: AGENDA#/SUBJECT. I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda/subject item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. Signature This document is a public record subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act.