The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About12/03/2013Diamond City Council Agenda Tuesday, December 3, 2013 6:30 p.m. — Regular Meeting Public Financing Authority Annual Meeting The Government Center South Coast Air Quality Management District/ Main Auditorium 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Jack Tanaka Ron Everett Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Ling -Ling Chang Carol Herrera Steve Tye Council Member Council Member Council Member City Manager James DeStefano 9 City Attorney David DeBerry City Clerk Tommye Cribbins Copies of staff reports or other written documentation relating to agenda items are on file in the Office of the City Clerk, and are available for public inspection. If you have questions regarding an agenda item, please contact the City Clerk at (909) 839-7010 during regular business hours. In an effort to comply with the requirements of Title 11 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the City of Diamond Bar requires that any person in need of any type of special equipment, assistance or accommodation (s) in order to communicate at a City public meeting, must inform the City Clerk a minimum of 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting. Have online access? City Council Agendas are now available on the City of Diamond Bar's web site at www.CityofDiamondBar.com Please refrain from smoking, eating or drinking in the Council Chambers. The City of Diamond Bar uses recycled paper and encourages you to do the same. �y ' fir w n»• CITY OF DIAMOND BAR CITY COUNCICAOENDA December 3, 2013 CALL TO ORDER: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: INVOCATION: ROLL CALL: APPROVAL OF AGENDA: POST ELECTION PROCEDURES Next Resolution No. 2013-35 Next Ordinance No. 14 (2013) 6:30 p.m. Mayor Pastor Jeanne Faveau-Sorvillo United Church of Christ Council Members Chang, Herrera, Tye, Mayor Pro Tem Everett, Mayor Tanaka Mayor 1. Adopt Resolution No. 2013 -XX: Reciting the Fact of the General Municipal Election Held on November 5, 2013, Declaring the Result and Such other Matters as Provided by Law. Recommended Action: Adopt. Requested by: City Manager Administration of Oath of Office to Council Member Steve Tye, Ling -Ling Chang and Nancy A. Lyons. Presentation to Outgoing Council Member Ron Everett. Written materials distributed to the City Council within 72 hours of the City Council meeting are available for public inspection immediately upon distribution in the City Clerk's Office at 21810 Copley Dr., Diamond Bar, California, during normal business hours. December 3, 2013 PAGE 2 CITY COUNCIL REORGANIZATION 1. Selection of Mayor 2. Selection of Mayor Pro Tem 3. Presentation to Outgoing Mayor Jack Tanaka Recess/Reception Reconvene City Council Meeting 1. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATES, PROCLAMATIONS: 1.1 Presentation of Certificates of Recognition to Krystal Spindler, Editor and Kirsten Khoury, Layout and Graphic Design for their outstanding job with the Windmill Magazine. 2. CITY MANAGER REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS: "Public Comments" is the time reserved on each regular meeting agenda to provide an opportunity for members of the public to directly address the Council on Consent Calendar items or matters of interest to the public that are not already scheduled for consideration on this agenda. Although the City Council values your comments, pursuant to the Brown Act, the Council generally cannot take any action on items not listed on the posted agenda. Please complete a Speaker's Card and -give it to the City Clerk (completion of this form is voluntary). There is a five-minute maximum time limit when addressing the City Council. 4. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC COMMENT: Under the Brown Act, members of the City Council may briefly respond to public comments but no extended discussion and no action on such matters may take place. 5. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: 5.1 Holiday Diamond Ride — November 29, 2013 through Wednesday, January 1 2014 — Free shuttle services to and from Diamond Bar Shopping Centers. For 18 years and older. 5.2 Planning Commission Meeting — December 10, 2013 - 7:00 p.m., Windmill Community Room, 21810 Copley Drive. 5.3 Traffic and Transportation Commission Meeting — December 12, 2013 — 7:00 p.m., Windmill Community Room, 21810 Copley Drive. December 3, 2013 R PAGE 3 5.4 2013 Holiday Home Decorating Contest — Entry forms must be received no later than Friday, December 13, 2013 at 4:30 p.m.; Judging Wednesday, December 18, 2013 7:00 — 10:00 p.m. 3 Categories — Best Holiday Spirit, Best Use of Theme and Most Innovative. Residents may enter more than one category. 5.5 City Council Meeting — December 17, 2013 — 6:30 p.m., AQMD/Government Center Auditorium, 21865 Copley Drive. 5.6 Christmas Holiday — December 24 and 25, 2013 - City Offices will be Closed in Observance of the Christmas Holiday. City Offices will re -open Thursday, December 26, 2013 at 7:30 a.m. 5.7 Planning Commission Meeting — December 24, 2013 — 7:00 p.m., Windmill Community Room, 21810 Copley Drive. (Cancelled). 5.8 Holiday Tree Curbside Collection Program — December 26, 2013 through January 10, 2014. Trees free of decorations and flocking may be left at the curb for free pickup during this period. Any tree over 6 ft. must be cut in half. 5.9 Late Night Transit Pass Sale — Thursday, December 26, 2013, - Until 7:00 p.m., Diamond Bar City Hall, 21810 Copley Drive. 5.10 Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting —December 26, 2013 —7:00 p.m., Windmill Community Room, 21810 Copley Drive. (Cancelled). 5.11 New Year's Holiday —January 1, 2014 —City Offices will be Closed Wednesday, January 1, 2014 in observance of the New Year's Day. City Offices will re -open Thursday, January 2, 2014. CONSENT CALENDAR: 6.1 City Council Minutes — Regular Meeting of November 19, 2013 — Approve as submitted. Requested by: City Clerk 6.2 Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes — Regular Meeting of September 26, 2013 — Receive and File. Requested by: Community Services Department 6.3 Traffic and Transportation Commission Minutes — Regular Meeting of October 10. 2013 — Receive and File. Requested by: Public Works Department December 3, 2013 PAGE 4 6.4 Ratification of Check Register — Ratification of Check Register dated November 14, 2013 through November 27, 2013 totaling $1,673,684.76. Requested by: Finance Department ---- ---- — --- S— Treasure ?s Staternent----FoF-actober-20-1t3—and--Revised—Tfeasweers---- - ------- Statements of June, July, August and September 2013. Recommended Action: Approve. Requested by: Finance Department 6.6 Approval of Application to be Recertified as a Tree City USA for 2013 (12th Year) and Authorization for the Mayor to Sign the Application. Recommended Action: Approve. Requested by: Community Services Department 6.7 Approval of Contract Amendment No. 4 with KOA Corporation for On -Call Traffic Engineering Services in the Amount of $20,000. Recommended Action: Approve. Requested by: Public Works Department 6.8 Approval of Notice of Completion for the Residential Area 1B (Bounded by SR57160 to the North, Grand Avenue/Diamond Bar Boulevard to the South and the Neighborhood Surrounding Quail Summit Elementary School) and Arterial Zone 7 (Golden Springs Drive Between Lavender Drive and Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard between Brea Canyon Cut -Off and Brea Canyon Road) Road Maintenance Project. Recommended Action: Approve and File. Requested by: Public Works 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None. 8. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: 8.1 Willow Heights — Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295, Development Review and Tree Permit (Planning Case No. PL2013- 229). (Continued from November 19, 2013). December 3, 2013 PAGE 5 Recommended Action: There are four options for the Council to consider, which are described below: 1. If the Council chooses to approve the project as previously submitted, adopt Resolution No. 2013 -XX approving the Vesting Tentative Tract Map, -- -- — ----- — ----Development-Review, and Tree-PermiLfor-Planning-CaseWo-PL201-3 - -- -- -- - 229, to allow the subdivision for the development of 182 for -sale dwelling units and a 2.5 net acre neighborhood public park, based on the findings of DBMC Sections 21.20.080, 22.22.150, 22.48.040, and 22.38.110, subject to conditions of approval as listed within the draft resolution; OR 2 Direct the applicant to revise plans to include covering the channel with landscape improvements and continue the item to a specified date to allow the applicant additional time to submit revised plans and studies. Upon submittal of the required information, staff will complete the environmental assessment associated with the impacts of covering the channel and prepare a revised resolution for Council's consideration; OR 3. Remand the project to the Planning Commission with specific direction from the City Council; OR 4. Deny the Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Development Review, and Tree Permit, specifically identifying the reasons the required findings of DBMC Sections 21.20.080, 22.22.150, 22.48.040, and 22.38.110 cannot be made Requested by: Community Development Department 8.2 Approve for First Reading Ordinance No. XX(2013): Amending Division 5 of Chapter 8.12 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code Relating to Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) Requirements by Imposing Rainwater Low Impact Development (LID) Strategies on Projects that Require Building, Grading and Encroachment Permits. Recommended Action: Approve for First Reading by Title Only, Waive Full Reading of Ordinance No. XX (2013). Requested by: Public Works Department RECESS TO PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY: CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Chang ROLL CALL: Authority Members Everett, Tanaka, Tye, C/Chang, VC/Herrera December 3. 2013 PAGE 6 PUBLIC COMMENTS: "Public Comments" is the time reserved on each regular meeting agenda to provide an opportunity for members of the public to directly address the Authority on Consent Calendar items or matters of interest to the public that are not already scheduled for consideration on this agenda. Although the Public Financing Authority values your comments, pursuant to the ------------ -----frown-Act,-the-Authorlty-genera+[)--earvnot take- any- action-orritems-not-tisted-on------ ------- -- --- the posted agenda. Please complete a Speaker's Card and give it to the Authority Secretary (completion of this form is voluntary). There is a five-minute maximum time limit when addressing the Public Financing Authority. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR: 3.1 Public Financing Authority Minutes - Annual Meeting of December 4, 2012 -Approve as submitted. Requested by: Agency Secretary 3.2 Treasurer's Statement - November 1, 2012 through October 31, 2013. Recommended Action: Approve. Requested by: Finance Department 4. PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY REORGANIZATION: 4.1 Selection of Chair 4.2 Selection of Vice Chair AUTHORITY MEMBER COMMENTS: Items raised by individual Authority Members are for Authority discussion. Direction may be given at this meeting or the item may be scheduled for action at a future meeting. ADJOURN PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY MEETING: RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING: 9. COUNCIL SUB -COMMITTEE REPORTS AND MEETING ATTENDANCE REPORTS/COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS: 10. ADJOURNMENT: Agenda # 1 Meeting Date: Dec. 3, 20i CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT � ��oteotean'�� TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council VIA: James DeStefano, City Mang TITLE: Adoption of Resolution No. 2013- X Declaring the Results of the November 5, 2013 General Municipal Election RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2013 -XX: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, RECITING THE FACT OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD ON NOVEMBER 5, 2013, AND DECLARING THE RESULT AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY LAW. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None BACKGROUND: The City conducted its General Municipal Election for three City Council vacancies on November 5, 2013. With the exception of nomination of candidates, all aspects of the election were administered by the Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk on behalf of the City. The Registrar -Recorder certified the results of the election on November 25, 2013, confirming that Ling Ling Chang, Steve Tye and Nancy A. Lyons were duly elected for four-year terms. Adoption of the Resolution will ratify the results certified by the Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk on the City's behalf. Further, it will complete the election process and allow for the newly -elected Council Members to receive the Oath of Office and begin their four-year term. PREPARED BY�- r Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk Attachments: Resolution No. 2013 -XX Reviewed PO David Doyle, A s . ity Manager RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -XX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, RECITING THE FACT OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD ON NOVEMBER 5, 2013 DECLARING THE RESULT AND SUCH OTHER MATTERTS AS PROVIDED BY LAW WHEREAS, a General Municipal Election was held and conducted in the City of Diamond Bar, California, on Tuesday, November 5, 2013, as required by law; and WHEREAS, Notice of the Election was given in time, form and manner as provided by law, that voting precincts were properly established; that election officers were appointed and that in all respects the election was held and conducted and the votes were cast, received and canvassed and the returns made and declared in time, form and manner as required by the provisions of the Elections Code of the State of California for the holding of elections in general law cities; and WHEREAS, the County Election Department canvassed the returns of the election and has certified the results to the City Council, the results are received, attached and made a part hereof as "Exhibit A". NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTON 1 That the whole number of votes cast in the precincts except vote by mail voter ballots and provisional ballots was 2,016 That the whole number of vote by mail and provisional voter ballots cast in the City was 3,158, making a total of 5,174 ballots cast in the City. SECTION 2. That the names of persons voted for at the election for Member of the City Council are as follows: Ling Ling Chang Joseph Kim Steve Tye Ron Everett Martin Nakaishi Nancy A. Lyons SECTION 3. That the number of votes given at each precinct and the number of votes given in the City to each of the persons above named for the respective offices for which the persons were candidates were as listed in Exhibit "A" attached. SECTION 4. The City Council does declare and determine that LING LING CHANG was elected as a Member of the City Council for the full term of four years; STEVE TYE was elected as a Member of the City Council for the full term of four years; and NANCY A. LYONS was elected as a Member of the City Council for the full term of four years. SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall enter on the records of the City Council of the City, a statement of the result of the election showing: (1) The whole number of ballots cast in the City; (2) The names of the persons voted for; (3) For what office each person was voted for; (4) The number of votes given at each precinct to each person, (5) The total number of votes given to each person. SECTION 6. That the City Clerk shall immediately make and deliver to each of the persons so elected a Certificate of Election signed by the City Clerk and authenticated; that the City Clerk shall also administer to each person elected the Oath of Office prescribed in the Constitution of the State of California and shall have them subscribe to it and file it in the office of the City Clerk. Each and all of the persons so elected shall then be inducted into the respective office to which they have been elected. SECTION 7. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of December, 2013. Jack Tanaka, Mayor I, TOMMYE A. CRIBBINS, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the day of 2011, by the following Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: rommye Cribbins, City Clerk DEAN C. LOGAN Regia r -R wMerr Ontyperk November 25, 2013 Ms. Tommye A. Cribbins, City Clerk City of Diamond Bar 21810 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, California 91765 Dear Ms. Cribbins: Enclosed are the Official Canvass Certificate and the Official Statement of Votes Cast by precinct for the City of Diamond Bar General Municipal Election consolidated with the Local and Municipal Consolidated Elections held on November 5, 2013. Please call the Election Planning Section at (562) 462-2317, if you have any questions. Sincerely, DEAN C. LOGAN Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk FRANCIS GUIJARO, Head Election Planning Section Enclosures Official Canvass Certificate Official Statement of Votes Cast ...�.12400 Imperial Highway, Norwalk, California 90650 - www.lavote.net ,� � tr; Y: 1 I ;x.1, I t �� j:•1 �I i. Angeles, of the State of California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that pursuant to the provisions of Section 15300 et seq. of the California Elections Code, I did canvass the returns of the votes cast for each elective office and/or measure(s) for at the Local and Municipal Consolidated Elections, held on the 5th day of November 2013. I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Statement of Votes Cast, to which this certificate is attached, shows the total number of ballots cast in said jurisdiction, and that the whole number of votes cast for each candidate and/or measure(s) in said jurisdiction in each of the respective precincts therein, and the totals of the respective columns and the totals as shown for each candidate and/or measure(s) are full, true and correct. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal this 25th day of November 2013. Eau C , �� DEAN C. LO Registrar-Recorder/C my Clerk County of Los Angeles COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES LOCAL AND MUNICIPAL CONSOLIDATED ELECTIONS NOVEMBER 5, 2013 PAGE 78.1 DIAMOND BAR CY GEN MUNI COUNCILMEMBER ''.. LING LING CHANG JOSEPH', KIM FINAL OFFICIAL STEVE STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST 1 TYE'', RON EVERETT MARTIN NAKAISHI '.. NANCY A''. LYONS I REGISTPA- BALLOTS CITY/PREC TION CAST„ DIAMOND BAR 1780001A 2079 - 143 65� 23 69 531 18 70, AV/V3M 0 226 109 58 101 93 39 93 TOTAL 2079 369 1741 81 170 146 57 163 DIAMOND BAR 1780002A 3131 173 82 39 114 61 18 103 AV/VBM 0 276 126j 56 178 114 44 13] TOTAL 3131 449 208- 95 292 175 62 234; DIAMOND DAR 1780003A '.. 1315 90 44 29 55 35 16 52, AV/VBM - 0 149 85 30-' 82 61 18 62 TOTAL 1315 239 129 59. 137 96 34 114' DIAMOND .BAR 1780006A 1125 46 29 10 26 15 5 271 AV/VBM 0 137 86 23 83 59 23 58 TOTAL 1125 1831 115 33 109 74 28 8S DIAMOND BAR 1780020A 2210 164 73 38 75 61! 23 90, AV/VBM 0 252 120 49 141 1071 42 1371 TOTAL - 2210 416 193 - 87 216 168: 65 227 - DIAMOND BAR 1780041A 1546 150 70 24 85 781 27 75 AV/VBM 0 145, 72 40 80 771 24 63', TOTAL 1546 2951 142 64 165 1551 51 138 DIAMOND BAR 1780043A 2377 163 85 40 90 52 24 9q AV/VBM 0 293 164 74 169 1061 47 155 TOTAL .2377 456 249 114 ..259 158 71 245' DIAMOND BAR 1780065B 2214 153 88 27 98 591 15 841 AV/VBM 0 220 117 39 139 89- 38 133'x, TOTAL 2214 373 205 66 237 1481 53 217 DIAMOND BAR 1780066A 1918 98 51 29 61 44 14 53 AV/VBM 0 161 1001 39 - 96 561 34 74 TOTAL 1918 259 151 68 157 100 48. 13Y DIAMOND BAR 1780067A 2530 170 106 48 106 62 27 7� AV/VBM 0 194 118 48 124 64 26 82'.. TOTAL 2530 364 224 96 230 126 53 - 153,i DIAMOND BAR 1780069A 846 49 25 8 27 16 8 23, AV/VBM 0 90 49 20 57 29 16 49' TOTAL 846 139 74 28 84 45 24 7; DIAMOND BAR 1780071C 567 38 23 16 18 10 9 27 AV/VBM 0 44 19 11 26 171 17 22 TOTAL 567 82 42 27 44 27, 26 49 DIAMOND BAR 1780073A 1833 137 83 33 84 37! 24 8b, AV/VBM 0 152 8B 32 -92 7218 82,, TOTAL 1 1833 2B9 171 65 176 109 42 162'x, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES LOCAL AND MUNICIPAL CONSOLIDATED ELECTIONS NOVEMBER 5, 2013 PAGE 76.2 DIAMOND BAR CY GEN MUNI'.. COUNCILMEMBER LING LING', CHANG JOSEPH KIM FINAL OFFICIAL STEVE', STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST TYE', RON EVERETT MARTIN NAKAISHI NANCY A '.. LYONS REGISTRA- BALLOTS' CITY/PREC TION CAST DIAMOND BAR 1780075A 1596 -71 27 20 391 32 12 '- 3511 AV/VBM 0 - 115 65 24 51 42 13 61'1 TOTAL 1596 186 92 44 901 74 25 961, DIAMOND BAR 1780076A 1911 111 59 37 67: 36 18 581 AZA/VBM 0 192 121 45 951 62 29 851 TOTAL 1911 303 180 82 162 98 47 143. DIAMOND BAR 1780079A 1077 37 24 12 18 8 8 131 AV/VBM 0 -102 51 23 52 41 4 601 - TOTAL 1077 139 75 35 - 70 49 12 731; DIAMOND BAR 1780091A 2270 127 72 44 68 44 11 5411 AV/VBM 0 248 128' 73 107 79 40 116'x,) TOTAL 2270 375 2001 117 1751 123 51 170: DIAMOND BAR 1780092A 1444 96 58 32 47 33 14 42';, AV/VBM 0 162 83 39'-' 75 52 38 .641 TOTAL 1444 258 141 71 122 85 52 1061 PRECINCT TOTAL VOTE 31989 2016 1064 509 1147 736 291 10531. VBM TOTAL VOTE 0 3158 1701 723 1748 1220 510 15251 .GRAND TOTAL VOTE 31989 -5174 2765, 1232 I r 28951 i 1956 I 801 25781 I COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES LOCAL AND MUNICIPAL CONSOLIDATED ELECTIONS NOVEMBER 5, 2013 PAGE 78,3 (DIAMOND BAR CY GEN MUNI COUNCILMEMBER :LING LING', CHANG, JOSEPH KIM FINAL OFFICIAL STEVE 'TYE STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST RON EVERETT� MARTIN NAKAISHI NANCY A LYONS I� REGISTRA- BALLOTS CITY/PREC TION CAST COUNTYWIDE 31989 2016 1064 509 '1147 736 291 1053 COUNTYWIDE 0 3158 1701 723 1748 1220 510 1525' VOTE BY MAIL TOTAL 31989 5174 2765 1232 2895 1956 801 25781 - 39TH US CONGRESSIONAL 31989 2016 1064 509 1147 736 291 1053', 39TH US CONGRESSIONAL 0 3158 1701 723 1748 1220 - 510 1525'1 VOTE BY MAIL 1 - TOTAL 31989 5174 2765 1232 2895 1956 801 2578', 29TH ST SENATE 31989 2016 1064 509 1147 736 _ 291 105311 29TH ST SENATE 0 3158 1701 723 1748 1220 510 15251 VOTE BY MAIL,,) TOTAL 31989 5174 2765 1232 2895 1956 801 257811 i 55TH STATE ASSEMBLY 31989 2016 1064 509 1147 736 291 1053'i 55TH STATE ASSEMBLY 0 3156 1701 7231 1748 1220 510 1525�' VOTE BY MAIL TOTAL 31989 5174 2765 1232 2895 1956 801 25781 4TH SUPERVISORIAL 31989 2016 1064 509 1147 _ 736 291 1053'. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES LOCAL AND MUNICIPAL CONSOLIDATED ELECTIONS NOVEMBER 5, 2013PAGE 78.4 DIAMOND BAR CY GEN MUNI COUNCILMEMBER LING LING CHANG JOSEPH' KIM FINAL OFFICIAL STEVE STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST TYE , RON EVERETT' MARTIN NAKAISHI NANCY A LYONS j REGISTRA- BALLOTS CITY/PREC TION CAST i 4TH SUPERVISORIAL - 0 3158 1701 723 '. 1748 1220 510 1529 VOTE BY MAIL TOTAL 31989 5174 2765 1232 2895 1956 801 2578: 3RD BOARD OF EQUALIZATION- 31989 2016 1064 509 .1147 736 291 1053! 3RD BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 0 3158 1701 723 1748 1220 510 1525 VOTE BY MAIL TOTAL - 31989 5174 2765 1232 .28951 1956 801- 257$ i CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 31989 2016 1064 509 1147] 736 291 1053 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 0 3158 1701 723 17481 1220] 5101 1525 VOTE BY MAIL TOTAL 31989 5174 2765 1232 2895 I i i 19561 801; I 2578 i Agenda No. 6.1 MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL @[UF[ff REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR NOVEMBER 19, 2013 CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Jack Tanaka called the Regular City Council meeting to order at 6:31 p.m. in the Windmill Room, Diamond Bar City Hall, 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Tanaka led the Pledge of Allegiance. INVOCATION: Monsignor James Loughnane, St. Denis Church, gave the invocation. ROLL CALL: Council Member Chang, Herrera, Tye, Mayor Pro Tem Everett and Mayor Tanaka. Staff Present: James DeStefano, City Manager; David Doyle, Assistant City Manager; David DeBerry, City Attorney; David Liu, Public Works Director; Bob Rose, Community Services Director; Dianna Honeywell, Finance Director; Greg Gubman, Community Development Director; Ken Desforges, IS Director; Marsha Roa, IS Manager; Grace Lee, Senior Planner; Kimberly Young, Associate Engineer Sterling Mosley, Assistant Engineer; Ryan McLean, Assistant to the City Manager; Alfredo Estevez, IS Help Desk Support Technician and Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: As Presented. 1 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATES, PROCLAMATIONS: 1.1 Mayor Tanaka and City Council Members presented a City Tile to Lt. Chris Blasnek in recognition of his transfer from the Diamond Bar/Walnut Sheriff's Station to the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Headquarters. Jody Roberto representing Senator Huff's Office also presented Lt. Blasnek with a Certificate. 1.2 Mayor Tanaka and City Council Members along with Raul Galindo, President and Peter Pirritano Vice President of Diamond Bar Community Foundation; Spiro Mantis, representing the office of Congressman Ed Royce; Dickie Simmons, representing the office of Supervisor Don Knabe, and Jody Roberto representing the office of Senator Bob Huff, .presented Certificates of Recognition and cash prize month to the winners of the "Through My Lens" 2013 Photo Contest. M/Tanaka announced that Congressman Curt Hagman could not be present this evening but provided certificates for each winner. 2. CITY MANAGER REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: CM/DeStefano introduced Mike Homes, General Manager, Walnut Valley Water District who gave a presentation regarding the City's water pressure as a result of comments received from community members during a recent City Council meeting. NOVEMBER 19, 2013 PAGE 2 CITY COUNCIL Mr. Holmes introduced First Vice President, Barbara Carrera representing Diamond Bar and Dr. Allen Wu, representing the City of Walnut. Mr. Holmes provided a Power Point presentation and stated that every foot of elevation equates to about .43 pounds of pressure (1/2 foot) which is why water reservoirs and storage tanks are placed on top of hills and flow down to customers. He pointed out that without adequate water pressure, residents would not enjoy low insurance premiums. In order to meet customer demands based on the number of homes, population and use, minimum pressure helps with performance, reliable service and maintains sanitary integrity which is required by the California Health Department. There is a pressure variance throughout the system due to the loss of pressure when water runs through the pipe and gravity, the force of which becomes greater as the water moves down the hill. Homes toward the top of the hill have less pressure and homes toward the bottom of the delivery system have greater pressure. As a result, the District employs various system controls to maintain adequate pressure throughout the system. With varying pressure from the top of the system down to the bottom the code requires a pressure regulator, a device that fits on the outside of the water supply pipe that enters the home and which is maintained by the customer. New home construction is required to be fitted with such a device which then becomes the responsibility of the homeowner to maintain and regulate. If there is a fluctuation of pressure in the system the regulator will keep the pressure constant in the home. If the home does not have a pressure regulator it should have one or if the regulator does not function it should be check. The District is happy to send a service rep out to check the pressure regulator as a service to its customers; however, the water department will not fix or adjust the regulator but the service rep will tell the homeowner if the regulator is not working. Pressure regulators are good for seven to ten years but may need to be replaced. The regulators can be adjusted between 55 and 100 psi but usually within a 50, 60 or 80 psi range. The Uniform Plumbing Code requires a pressure regulator for any building or home where the static pressure is over 80 psi. Therefore, it is prudent for homeowners to check their regulators from time to time. If a homeowner hears a noise in the pipes or their sprinkler efficiency, there may be a problem with the regulator. C/Tye asked what the District found out about the residents who addressed the Council about pressure problems. Mr. Holmes responded that the reps spoke with the residents and hoped their questions were answered. Such conversations are confidential; however, the residents have not come back to the District with more questions. In response to concerns about the District's employees being on the street during street overlay, the Water District follows paving crews at all times to protect the District's valve lids. Mr. Holmes responded to C/Tye that the District found no problems related to the Water District. NOVEMBER 19, 2013 PAGE 3 CITY COUNCIL ACM/Doyle updated the City Council on its approved "Report for Rewards" program which went into effect on November 15. This morning the committee met and reviewed three separate incidents that occurred over the past six months and awarded four recipients $500 each for their efforts in reporting suspicious activity which directly resulted in the arrest of five burglars and return of stolen property. The recipients will be contacted toseeif they wish to be recognized by the City Council or remain anonymous as is their right. 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Allen Wilson recommended that instead of the library opening one hour earlier Monday through Thursday that the four hours be used to open the library on Sundays which in his opinion would be beneficial for residents. Melita Krisky, 20739 Lycoming, Walnut, stated that she and her neighbors favored a quiet zone at Lemon and Lycoming. She stated that she had provided the City Clerk with train horn logs she has kept since early October which represents nearly 600 horn blasts. The log is not accurate because she is gone from home during the day and she does not log horn blasts throughout the night. On a full day of logging there is an average of 17 horn blasts. This is a quality of life issue for her and her neighbors. She presented an article about a study of seniors living close to airport and higher incidents of heart disease and high blood pressure and felt that the train horn blasts should be considered an equivalent to airport noise. Between Brea Canyon, Lemon Avenue and the SR60 there are nearly 350 homes which equates to about 1100 residents that need the City's help to mitigate the social and environmental impact. As the number of train trips increase so too does the frustration of the residents. She provided copies of signed flyers to the City Council provided by residents who were unable to attend tonight's meeting. Greg Rochford and Ara Cho, 2775-A Diamond Bar Boulevard, provided information about the Giocoso Youth Orchestra and invited the City Council and residents to its Christmas Concert on Tuesday, December 17 at 7:00 p.m. at the Diamond Bar Community Center. All concerts are free to the public. Mr. Rochford also announced that for the second time in three years the orchestra has been invited to perform at the West Coast Youth Orchestra Festival at the Walt Disney Concert Hall in Los Angeles in June. This is the regular school year string orchestra program for students fifth through twelfth grade. The organization also offers a summer program that is a non -audition group for any student that play an instrument of any experience which is more pops oriented rather than classical. C/Tye asked Mr. Rochford to speak with Jody Roberto because the Diamond Bar Community Foundation does a benefit every year and his organization may wish to participate. NOVEMBER 19, 2013 PAGE 4 CITY COUNCIL Pui-Ching Ho, Diamond Bar Librarian, announced two workshops for children 0-4 years old and their parents on Wednesday, November 20 and 27 at 10:00 a.m. to help parents and their children play together. Topics include nutrition and child development. - The Friendsofthe Library are planning a Read Together Diamond Bar program and the library is seeking input from the community about which of four books should be selected: 1) The Soloist by Steve Lopez; Battle Hymn of Tiger Mother by Amy Chua; On Gold Mountain by Lisa See, and True Notebooks by Mark Salzman. All entries will be entered into a "Friends of the Library Opportunity Drawing" and the winner will receive a $25 gift certificate to Basically Books Bookstore. The deadline for voting is January 4, 2014. Roy Tucker, floral artist, will demonstrate how to make a beautiful Thanksgiving centerpiece on Saturday, November 23 at 2:00 p.m. At the end of the program several lucky participants will be randomly selected to take home a professionally -made centerpiece. She thanked the City Council and staff for their continued support of the Diamond Bar Library and wished everyone a Happy Thanksgiving. Raymond Hung, 2510 Alamo Heights "The Country Estates" said there was about a two to three foot difference between their driveway and the street. They purchased the home about a year ago and just before escrow closed the street was removed due to construction next door to his property. When the street was rebuilt it created the difference. The contractor told him that they could not do anything about the problem because of an Edison transformer on their side of the street and that he would need to speak with Edison. He spoke with Edison and was told that whoever created the problem would be responsible for mitigating the problem. The HOA said they were not responsible and board members told him the Board did not approve the street at that grade. He is at a loss about what to do and asked for the Council's help. Nick Mazman said he is happy to have lived in Diamond Bar more than 20 years. In the spirit of the Thanksgiving season he thanked the Sheriff and Fire Department for an excellent job protecting life and property in the City. The diversity of Diamond Bar includes many races, nationalities, religious and economic levels which makes for a stronger community. Diamond Bar schools are excellent. He congratulated the current City Council, staff and their helpers. Although many communities have had financial problems, Diamond Bar seems to have a very sound financial base and he hoped it would continue. Several improvements have been made by this City Council. Many years ago there was little harmony in the City Council and he hoped that this would not continue and that members could disagree without being disagreeable. NOVEMBER 19, 2013 PAGE 5 CITY COUNCIL RESPONSE TO PUBLIC COMMENTS: CM/DeStefano responded to comments he made about the Library that what he said was that the City of Diamond Bar had received a report regarding the annual attendance, services, amount of revenue provided to the library by Diamond Bar taxpayers and costs associated with the library operation The library is a County - of Los Angeles department that is housed within the new City Hall building which Diamond Bar was happy to encourage the Los Angeles County library to consider for more than doubling the size of the library. In the report he indicated that a few changes were being proposed by Margaret Donnellan Todd, County Librarian, one of which was to extend the hours of operation for a few days during the week by opening an hour earlier. That was her recommendation. She is the expert in the County Library system and she was reporting to CM/DeStefano as he reported to the City Council. Residents are encouraged to continue utilizing the library which has been phenomenally successful with 21,000 to 22,000 guests per month (about 800 per day) since its opening in its current location. CM/DeStefano offered to forward the speaker's comments to Ms. Todd for her consideration. CM/DeStefano responding to the speaker's desire for a quiet zone at Lemon and Lycoming stated that this City Council as well as previous Council Members have been very interested in reducing the train noise that permeates through the community throughout the day and evening. The current City Council has worked very closely with the Alameda Corridor Construction Authority which built and completed a few years ago the undercrossing at Brea Canyon Road which did away with the train blasts that would have otherwise been necessary at that location. The City continues to work with the Alameda Corridor Construction Authority which is a large area construction authority that is working on railroad crossings throughout most of the San Gabriel Valley and is looking at other intersections including Lemon and Lycoming where the tracks cross Lemon Avenue at the Diamond Bar/City of Industry border. With Council's concurrence, CM/DeStefano said he would contact ACE and contact a couple of the surrounding communities that have worked on quiet zone projects within their communities. These are extraordinarily lengthy processes and if the railroads come to the table they come kicking and screaming with respect to who is responsible, who pays for it and what the timeline will be. In early 2014 the City will learn whether or not a football stadium will be developed in Los Angeles County, either in downtown LA or at the City of Industry site and contained within the project for the City of Industry site is a mandatory quiet zone that would be built at Lemon Avenue, Lycoming and the railroad tracks. CM/DeStefano said that with respect to the driveway/street issue on Alamo Heights, Alamo Heights is private property held within the private gate -guarded community known as "The Country Estates". There is a neighboring Horizon Pacific Development that has been approved and has either commenced or is close to commencing. Staff will discuss the matter with the resident and the contractor to see if there is any discussion or assistance. While this is a private NOVEMBER 19, 2013 PAGE 6 CITY COUNCIL street the City has a very good relationship with The Country Estates HOA and general management and staff will contact those individuals to determine whether any assistance can be provided to the speaker. However, this is a matter that is within and controlled by a private homeowner's association. C/Tye asked if there was a quiet zone at Valley and Lemon. - CM/DeStefano responded C/Tye was correct. C/Tye asked how hard it would be to create a quiet zone at Lemon and Lycoming. CM/DeStefano said that it is an idea the City has had for a long time and this City Council participated in furthering that idea. CM/DeStefano said he needed to get more information and knows that it is a lengthy process. It took the City of Walnut about 10 years and maybe longer to secure the effort at Valley Boulevard at Lemon. C/Tye asked if the City issued permits to Horizon Pacific on the basis that no damage would be done to private properties. CM/DeStefano said that without knowing all of the facts it may be that the City Council would be asked to make a decision in the future. Clearly, knowing that the property is within a private gate -guarded community and is a home that received permits many years ago he believed it was best for the City to take a step back, look at the details and work with the association and property owner to determine a possible solution. 4. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: 5.1 Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting - November 21, 2013 - 7:00 p.m., Windmill Community Room, 21810 Copley Drive. 5.2 Planning Commission Meeting - November 26, 2013 - 7:00 p.m., Windmill Community Room, 21810 Copley Drive. 5.3 Thanksgiving Holiday - City Offices closed November 28 and 29, 2013 in observance of the Thanksgiving Holiday. City offices reopen Monday, December 2, 2013 at 7:30 a.m. 5.4 City Council Meeting - December 3, 2013 - 6:30 p.m., SCAQMD Main Auditorium, 21865 Copley Drive. NOVEMBER 19, 2013 PAGE 7 CITY COUNCIL 6. CONSENT CALENDAR: C/Tye moved, C/Herrera seconded, to approve the Consent Calendar as presented. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Chang, Herrera, Tye, MPT/Everett, M/Tanaka NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None 6.1 APPROVED CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — Regular Meeting of November 5 2013 - As Submitted. 6.2 RECEIVED AND FILED PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES — Regular Meeting of October 8, 2013. 6.3 RATIFIED CHECK REGISTER — Dated October 31, 2013 through November 13, 2013 totaling $964,464.20. 6.4 ACCEPTED WORK PERFORMED BY GERONIMO CONCRETE, INC. FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PANTERA DOG PARK ADA IMPROVEMENTS; DIRECTED THE CITY CLERK TO FILE THE NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND RELEASE THE RETENTION THIRTY-FIVE DAYS AFTER THE RECORDATION DATE; AUTHORIZED THE EXPENDITURE OF AN ADDITIONAL $9,500 OF CDBG FUNDS FOR CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 WITH GERONIMO CONCRETE. 6.5 AWARDED CONTRACT TO CALIFORNIA SURFACING FOR THE TENNIS AND BASKETBALL COURT RESURFACING AT HERITAGE, MAPLE HILL, PANTERA AND RONALD REAGAN PARKS IN THE AMOUNT OF $41,900; WITH A CONTINGENCY OF $4,190 (10% FOR A TOTAL AUTHORIZATION OF $46,090. 6.6 APPROPRIATED $15,000 FROM THE AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT FUND AND APPROVED CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 1 WITH TRANSCORE FOR THE TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SUPPORT. 7. PUBLIC HEARING: 7.1 RESOLUTION NO. 2013-34: APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 72295, ASSOCIATED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND TREE PERMIT APPLICATIONS, AND ADDENDUM #1 TO THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE SITE D SPECIFIC PLAN (PLANNING CASE NO. PL2013-229) TO AUTHORIZE THE DEVELOPMENT OF 182 RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND A 2.5 NET -ACRE NEIGHBORHOOD PUBLIC PARK AT THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF BREA CANYON ROAD AND DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD, DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765; CONSTRUCT 182 RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND A 2.5 NET ACRE NEIGHBORHOOD PUBLIC PARK LOCATED AT NOVEMBER 19, 2013 PAGE 8 CITY COUNCIL THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BREA CANYON ROAD AND DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD, DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 (ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 8714-002-900, 8714-002-901, 8714-002-903, AND 8714-015-001), AND DETERMINING ASSOCIATED CONTEMPLATED DISPOSITIONS AND ACQUISITIONS OF PROPERTY ARE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN. CM/DeStefano stated that before the City Council tonight is Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295, Development Review and Tree Permit (Planning Case No. PL2013-229) for property located at the corner of Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard which is co -owned by the City of Diamond Bar (about 1 acre) and the Walnut Valley Unified School District (29 acres). This item comes to the City Council at the recommendation of the Planning Commission and as a follow up to the City Council's approval of the project umbrella elements of February 2012. CDD/Gubman stated that staff is recommending that the City Council approve the Planning Commission's recommendation approving the entitlements that comprise the proposed Willow Heights Development. This is a proposal to develop 182 units on the Site D property and to construct and dedicate to the City a two and one-half acre neighborhood park. On February 21, 2012, following a four-year highly publicized planning process the City Council adopted the Site D Specific Plan. The Specific Plan was crafted as a regulatory and policy document, the blueprint/roadmap for guiding development of Site D. Also on February 21, 2012 the City Council certified the Final Environmental Impact Report that was prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The purpose of the EIR was to evaluate, disclose and mitigate the environmental impacts associated with the Site D Specific Plan. The Specific Plan was significantly shaped by public involvement in the planning process and when it was ultimately approved and adopted by the City Council, it provided for the development of up to 200 for -sale dwelling units and requires the developer that eventually takes on the project to construct at least two useable acres of land to be set aside as a public neighborhood park. Lennar Homes is the developer that is currently in escrow to acquire Site D and is proposing a Master Plan Gated Residential Community that would include 182 for -sale dwelling units plus a two and one-half acre neighborhood park that would be dedicated to the City as set forth in the Specific Plan. The proposed development being located at one of the entries to the City would serve as a visual gateway to the City with its distinctive identity and would incorporate significant landmark features at the intersection of Diamond Bar Boulevard and Brea Canyon Road as well as, public right-of-way enhancements that would be in keeping with the citywide streetscape standards that staff is currently working on with the envisioned prototype for these improvements to take NOVEMBER 19, 2013 PAGE 9 CITY COUNCIL place on Grand Avenue in the coming year. Although the City Council's adoption of the Specific Plan nearly two years ago confers and vests the underlying rights to develop Site D in the manner that is proposed by Lennar there are still specific entitlements that must lye secured -prior to recordation -of the saleable -tats -and prior to the - issuance of grading and building permits to accommodate the development. These entitlements are 1) the Vesting Tentative Tract Map, the process in which lots are created and the 30 -acre property is subdivided to accommodate the division, development and sale of individual parcels as well as, creation of the boundaries for the public park; 2) Development Review Application for the proposed architectural and landscape design elements associated with the residential component of Site D; and 3) Tree Permit. The EIR discussed the biological impacts among several other potential environmental affects that would result from development of this project and in light of the fact that there are 83 protected trees on the Site D property (Oak, Sycamore or Willow that are at least eight inches in Caliper at about chest height) the minimum mitigation for removal of protected trees under the citywide Tree Protection Ordinance is to replace a protected tree with another protected tree at a 3:1 ratio. With this project and removal of 83 protected trees consisting of 75 Walnut, 6 Willows and 2 Coast Live Oaks, 249 replacement trees are proposed on the plans consisting of Oaks and Sycamores. The Walnut trees that are part of the tree removal are proposed to be replaced with Sycamores and Oaks has to do with the availability of nursery stock and viability of that particular type of tree. Because the project achieves the target ratio for replacement trees, the replacement plan is in compliance with the mitigation measures and underlying code requirements. The Site D Specific Plan established that Site D would be developed with up to 200 homes and a public park that provides at least two -acres of useable open space. Lennar's submittal provides project level details for the buildout of Site D and consists of 182 units and a 2.5 -acre neighborhood park which results in a slight reduction from the maximum number of dwelling units allowed and a slightly larger park than the minimum required in the Specific Plan. The City Council's packet includes the Planning Commission's report (incorporated by reference in Attachment 2 of staff's report) which provides a detailed description of the proposed Vesting Tentative Map, Development Review and Tree Permit applications. The staff report also provides a more detailed analysis of how the three entitlement applications fully comply with the Site D Specific Plan, the Diamond Bar Development Code as well as, with the Diamond Bar Subdivision Ordinance, and provides the basis for the positive findings that the Planning Commission adopted in its Resolution recommending that the City Council approve this project. Accompanying the written documentation there are several graphic exhibits attached to staff's report NOVEMBER 19, 2013 PAGE 10 CITY COUNCIL and entered into the record which includes the Tentative Tract Map, the preliminary grading plans, architectural and landscape plans and conceptual park plans. CDD/Gubman stated that Site D will be marketed by Lennar under the name "Willow Heights" and WiHow Heights wilt be comprised of three distinct neighborhoods which include a Townhome component which lies somewhat parallel to Brea Canyon Road and somewhat behind the Brea Canyon channel with its westerly boundary somewhat parallel to the channel alignment. 1) The townhome community consists of 62 units which are traditional attached townhomes. Eleven buildings are three stories high and consist of four separate proposed floor plans with square footage ranging between about 1500 to 2000 square feet. The townhomes will feature Spanish and Italian architectural themes. 2) The cluster homes consist of 73 detached single family homes technically referred to as condominiums (because they do not reside on individual lots) that front Diamond Bar Boulevard. The cluster homes will be two stories high with three proposed floor plans and feature Italian and Tuscan architectural themes. Square footage ranges from about 1800 to 2000 square feet. 3) The single family lots which are traditional individually owned lots that range in size from about 4200 to 7800 square feet. The homes are two story homes about 28 feet in height. Two floor plans are proposed with square footage ranging from about 2850 to 3400 square feet and the design theme for this community is Spanish and Tuscan. The overall site plan consists of an entrance to Willow Heights that is aligned with Cherrydale Avenue, an existing neighborhood street across Diamond Bar Boulevard. There will be a new phased signal provided at the new four-way intersection where the gated entry will reside. A secondary gated access will be located at Pasado Drive at the southwesterly corner of the development only to provide fire or evacuation as well as City park maintenance vehicles access (locked gate) and pedestrian traffic only into the park area. The specific park design elements are not proposed this evening. The design element plans of the park will proceed provided that the two lots that comprise the park footprint are approved. The highlights of the park plan include about 4.3 gross acres which includes slopes and other non - accessible areas. The net useable area with paths, playgrounds and seating areas is 2.5 acres. A key feature of the park is the rain garden alongside the Brea Canyon channel, the purpose of which is to provide an interpretive wetland feature as well as, to serve as a stormwater collection facility. CDD/Gubman provided photos of a basin in Aliso Viejo which shows the concept of this feature, the actual components of which can be adapted to Diamond Bar. Staff was impressed with the concept of this facility, its use of native, water -wise and plant materials and the way it created a walkable and inviting environment. Staff is confident that this NOVEMBER 19, 2013 PAGE 11 CITY COUNCIL would be a valuable addition to Diamond Bar's already diverse inventory of open space amenities. Other park features being proposed include a walking trail that runs along the Pasado entrance and includes areas of interest such as a tot lot, playground and exercise stations. On the side of the path that abuts the existing homes on Ambushers there would be substantial landscaping to provide noise and visual-barriers/sanctuary - between the new homes and the park users. A pedestrian bridge is being proposed to connect the wedged shape section of the park along Brea Canyon Road to the balance of the park. In addition, through the public process, the Specific Plan required an "entry feature" the approximate location of which is generally in the portion of the park that has a significant visual orientation toward individuals entering the City from the freeway onto Brea Canyon Road or Brea Canyon Cutoff. The minimum monetary contribution is based on building permit evaluation and is applied to the entry features, the design and character of which would be developed through the park design process. What was not shown on the park concept plan was a provision for off-street parking within the park. Since there is no parking on Brea Canyon Road and parking on Castle Rock Road would not be appropriate, the traffic engineer identified the appropriate drive approach off of Brea Canyon Road to allow motorists to safely enter and exit. He showed a section view of the parkway along Diamond Bar Boulevard which consisted of a view of the Diamond Bar Boulevard roadway and the incline sloping up to the cluster homes that provided an opportunity for 30 horizontal feet of dense landscape frontage which is a requirement of the Specific Plan and would be owned and maintained by the homeowner's association and maintained in perpetuity through the HOA dues. The Specific Plan and the EIR went into substantial analysis of the potential traffic impacts associated with this project and although it is somewhat counterintuitive to say that by adding more homes the traffic situation will be improved at the intersection of Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard. Because this project is being developed it allows the City to require the developer to provide significant street improvements and even though 182 additional homes are being added the City will benefit from improved capacity. The improvements include the following: At Brea Canyon Road the northbound segment will be widened and striped to provide a second dedicated right -turn lane to reduce the number of vehicles backed up by vehicles stopped at the light waiting to make a right turn. There will be a widening and restriping of the eastbound departure of Diamond Bar Boulevard to provide a third through -lane along the project frontage allowing for expeditious clearing of the intersection, and modification of the median to provide a left -turn lane at the westbound approach on Diamond Bar Boulevard. The existing bike lane will be retained and there will be traffic signal improvements to improve phasing and other programming matters. At the new Cherrydale intersection there will be an option -left through -lane and a separate right -turn lane on the NOVEMBER 19, 2013 PAGE 12 CITY COUNCIL northbound approach for motorists exiting the Willow Heights project, and restriping of the southbound approach to the existing neighborhood to provide an option left, through and right -turn on Cherrydale. The eastbound approach will be widened to provide a third lane along the project frontage and a separate right -turn lane. A left -turn lane will be installed at Cherrydale to allow dedicatedleftturns into the project without - affecting the through traffic on Diamond Bar Boulevard which will be controlled with the traffic signal. There were a number of other intersections identified in the Site D EIR that would have some incremental increase in volume as a result of this project which would be very slight but quantifiable so the developer is required to pay their portion of the added burden on those intersections. The City is looking at long- term fixes for those intersections and is looking for the funding to facilitate those improvements. CDD/Gubman explained that as the City moved through the Specific Plan process and moved into the Tract Map, conceptual grading plans and architectural plans, one ancient landslide was revealed that actually originates off-site and up the hill. As a result, it is not a situation in which the landslide can be excavated and the soil repaired. The accepted engineering approach to mitigate the landslide is to load the landslide to provide compacted fill to shore it up and stabilize it. The result of this approach is that the pads along the back of the tract will be raised a bit higher than originally envisioned in the Site D Specific Plan. Although views are not typically protected, staff requested a view analysis for purposes of disclosure on the five lots along the Ambushers frontage that would be in the line of site of the additional fill (Lots 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5). Lot 1 is the lowest lot and even though the pad elevation is lower than the nearest Willow Heights pad and its neighboring lot, it still had an open viewshed into the currently vacant portion of Site D. Looking out toward the proposed homes that would back up to the westerly boundary it shows that the existing ridgeline is still visible. Lot 2 is higher than Lot 1 and is also higher than the pad levels of Willow Heights' lots. Lot 3 is even higher and past Lot 5 the Willow Heights development sinks even further down until it reaches the intersection of Cold Spring and Ambushers where the pad elevations for the existing homes are 100 feet higher than the proposed pad elevations for the nearest Willow Heights houses. Lots 1 through 5 are at least 100 feet away from the nearest Willow Heights homes. There are a couple of conditions of approval in the Resolution that deal with rodent control issues during development that are derived from the Conditions of Approval for the Specific Plan. The requirements call for including in the grading plan a rodent barrier plan where physical barriers are installed along the perimeter of the site to prevent vectors from escaping. There is an additional condition for "best management practices" for eradicating the vectors so that there is not the impact of NOVEMBER 19, 2013 PAGE 13 CITY COUNCIL them escaping the site and becoming a nuisance to existing developments. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) environmental review process was completed and the Final EIR was approved on February 21, 2012for this project to deal withsomeof the technical refinements to the plan including the fact that the number of units is below what was entitled under the Specific Plan, the fair -share traffic impacts are somewhat lower. The EIR Addendum is the tool that contains minor changes that do not add or introduce new environmental impacts. On October 8, 2013 the Planning Commission recommended by a vote of 5-0 that the City Council approve the project as submitted. Staff's recommendation is to approve the Vesting Tentative Tract Map, the Design Review application, the Tree Permit and the Addendum to the Site D Specific Plan Final EIR to allow for the Willow Heights Development as presented in staff's report. C/Herrera thanked staff for the thorough preparation, presentation and orientation of the proposed project. She especially appreciated all of the detail from the Planning Commission and read all of the public comments. C/Tye said that when he first became aware that there would be a footbridge over the flood control channel to the Site D property he asked how difficult it would be to cover the flood control channel and incorporate it as part of the park, not unlike in Los Angeles where they cover roadways and lay sod to gain additional park space. When he brought up the notion he was told it was an interesting idea that would be looked at but it has not been brought up and addressed. He would like to know how difficult it would be to cover the flood control channel and that it might allow for additional parking as well and give Diamond Bar much needed additional park space. CM/DeStefano felt it would be appropriate for Lennar to speak to C/Tye's concern and offer any other comments regarding the proposal after which staff can comment on covering the flood control channel and adding to the park component. M/Tanaka opened the Public Hearing. Vinod Kashyap, 21452 Chirping Sparrow Road, a 27 year resident, past Traffic and Transportation Commissioner, Diamond Bar Community Foundation member and has worked closely with the City Council. He is a licensed civil engineer with the State of California, Metropolitan Water District, has been involved with construction management and is familiar with the environmental issues in the City. He read from a Court of Appeals Rules on Lead Agency's Ability to Delegate CEQA Decision- NOVEMBER 19, 2013 PAGE 14 CITY COUNCIL making authority dated November 4. He claimed that the EIR for this project is improper. Susan Scarbrough, 3540 Crooked Creek Drive, said she is opposed to this project and is particularly concerned about C/Tye's comments about the fact that there would be an -eyesore -down the middle of the project. She was told there would be no vehicle access via Pasado and people who gain access via Pasado via foot traffic will be parking in her neighborhood. Greg Ogonawski, 21492 Cold Spring Lane, asked if pine trees on his property were scheduled for demolition. Dean LaChasse, 3375 Bent Twig Lane, talked about current traffic congestion and the possibility of additional traffic on the side streets. He wanted to know how many on-site parking spaces were allocated. Don Sutton, 1107 Moonlake Drive, said he was concerned that bit by bit all of the open space is being given up and the Walnut trees are part of the City's heritage. He wanted to know what would happen to the deer and other wildlife that might be trapped during construction. Tran Vo, 21143 Ambushers Drive, said he lives on one of the five lots (Lot 3) and his view will be impacted by development. Based on the slide presentation he will lose part of the view from his back yard which will look directly at the second story window of the house behind his home. He asked the developer to consider the design of the homes behind the five lots to be one story or left as open land. Darci Gunter lives on the cul-de-sac on Castle Rock Road and asked if the City could give the residents permit parking or something that would prohibit people visiting the park from other areas from parking on their narrow streets. Tom Brookhouse, Hawkwood Road, Diamond Ridge Development, said he appreciated the presentation made by Lennar and did not know if others (developers) had been considered. The traffic problem for another 200 units will be a big problem for the alternate freeway, Diamond Bar Boulevard. He did not understand why the City had to have such a densely populated area. Why not 75 single-family homes? This is an affluent community and the cost of the land can be passed on to the homeowners which would help cut down some of the traffic. He concurred with the land for the park. How much money is being paid for this land and what the uses are for the money? The School Board used the money to buy bonds and they should use the money to retire bonds. He would like to see more studies. Three-story townhomes are very impractical and discriminate against people over 50 years of age and makes more money NOVEMBER 19, 2013 PAGE 15 CITY COUNCIL for the builder. Diamond Bar has been a City for a very short period of time and has had little choice over the land uses. This is probably the last big parcel of land for which there is a choice and he believes a lot more discussion has to take place. Geoff Smith, Lennar Homes, thanked CDDfGubman for his presentation. Lennar Homes is very excited to be present this evening to present Willow Heights to the City Council for its consideration. Lennar first learned about Site D when it received a public invitation to bid on the property which the School District classifies as "surplus property". With a little bit of drama at the bidding table, Lennar was the winning bidder at the public auction held on June 6, 2012. During this process Lennar became very familiar with the Site D Specific Plan and were very excited to read and understand what Lennar believes to be a terrific planning document and fully intended to and did use it as a template for the planning. The Specific Plan asks that the community be involved to define the elements of a new park. In January 2013 Lennar hosted a public workshop to help Lennar and the City develop a concept for the public park. The workshop was extremely positive and resulted in a consensus plan for the park which has been integrated into the development plans. The City park will bring a wonderful amenity to Diamond Bar and the local community. The park will offer new pedestrian linkages to promote healthy living and a connection to the natural environment. The Specific Plan also addresses traffic concerns. Traffic impacts are a very legitimate neighborhood concern; however, through the EIR process and the City approved Site -Specific Traffic Study, Lennar believes it is improving the neighborhood traffic. For example, the project is adding a third lane on Diamond Bar Boulevard and a right -turn lane on Brea Canyon Road. All combined within the next year Lennar will be investing over $1 million in - ground local street improvements. In addition, Lennar will pay a fair -share amount to the City for improvements that are some distance from the project. Beyond the Specific Plan Lennar drew its inspiration for Willow Heights from the rich character and natural landscape of the site and surrounding areas. For example, Lennar took to heart the City's protected tree program and is using live Oaks and Sycamores which will be a focal point of the community. Lennar also builds homes and as one of the nation's largest home builders, Lennar takes great pride and joy in homes it builds for communities. Lennar will be building three distinct neighborhoods which will offer a diverse range of home styles to meet a broad range of lifestyles and buyer preferences. For example, many of the homes will be designed to specifically meet the needs of multi -generational households which are called Next -Gen Homes. Lennar also believes in green building and can ensure the community it will use sustainable building practices such as high-energy efficient homes, low VSE paints and drought tolerant NOVEMBER 19, 2013 PAGE 16 CITY COUNCIL landscaping. Mr. Smith responded to speakers that Lennar will be containing all of the improvements, grading, and earthwork within the property lines and will not be grading on other people's property. Mr. Smith stated that every home will have a two -car covered garage and will meet the 3:1 ratio for guest parking. For the 60x70's the Specific Plan requires two guest stalls and Lennar is providing 185. For the attached and townhome neighborhoods, Lennar is required to provide 90 and Lennar is providing 105, both of which exceeds the guest parking guideline. C/Tye asked Mr. Smith about the feasibility of covering the flood control channel and incorporating it into the park. Mr. Smith responded that Lennar relied in part on the community outreach program to help Lennar dictate where and how the community visualizes the community park. One of the five groups recommended covering the channel and the other four did not. So, there were varying opinions on covering the channel. In addition, there are practical problems involved with covering the channel and the number one problem is timing. Dealing with LA County Flood Control would take many years to do such a project. He has unfortunate personal experience with building a channel that took over seven years and was very similar to the Site D situation. He understands from the engineers that the channel is undersized which would require making the channel larger and would ultimately eat up more park space so it becomes a monster to deal with and that would obviously delay delivering the park to the community. Secondly, Lennar feels that if the channel was covered it would still be LA County property and the City would be limited in putting any amenities on the space such as a tot lot, trees, etc. and ultimately, if LA County ever needed to maintain or upgrade the channel it would mean a loss of City property. Finally, Lennar felt it might be an attractive nuisance with coyotes and other animals being under the channel and the property line would then be uncovered which would leave an opening for children and animals. The way Lennar is approaching the channel is from a pedestrian scale standpoint and since the channel will not be covered it presents an opportunity to create a unique element to the park which is the bridge which will be integrated into the trail system of the park and bring it down to a pedestrian scale with signage and educational components. C/Tye said he was okay with late delivery of a park if it was a better park. When he looks at a bridge that goes over a flood channel he does not really view that as an attractive park and the bridge could be included whether or not the channel is covered. He asked Mr. Smith if he would be opposed to covering the channel if the timing issue could be resolved. NOVEMBER 19. 2013 PAGE 17 CITY COUNCIL Mr. Smith stated that Lennar would still be opposed to covering the channel because it is not what the community outreach program desired and it would be a major undertaking that Lennar feels would not be necessary. In addition, it would add another one-half acre to the City's park that creates a maintenance issue for the City. C/Herrera asked for clarification on the covering of the flood channel and whether there would be a safety issue with a bridge covering the open channel. Mr. Smith explained that the bridge would have regulatory handrails and it would be a decorative issue that Lennar did not view as a safety issue. The channel currently has chain link fencing on the right-of-way and Lennar will be working with the City to determine how that fence can be replaced with something more decorative which will integrate the channel into the park design in a better fashion. Again, Lennar did not view the bridge as a safety issue and if there is a safety issue it can be solved via the detailed design. C/Herrera said there is a park right next to the channel which means more kids coming to the park. Little boys being little boys love challenges and she can envision kids jumping in the channel. Mr. Smith said he believed that with proper fencing and good design safety concerns can be alleviated and Lennar will work with staff to address those concerns. M/Tanaka asked Mr. Smith to comment on park entry and vehicle parking on Presado Drive and asked if the parking was actually closer to Brea Canyon Road. Mr. Smith responded that the park is a passive park and not a destination park such as a ball field which requires a large amount of parking. This is a neighborhood park which is designed to serve the neighborhood and Lennar is promoting a walkable park from a number of directions — from Presado Drive only from a pedestrian standpoint; access from Diamond Bar Boulevard, Brea Canyon and Castle Rock. The addition of a parking lot off of Brea Canyon is a matter of detail design as to whether it should be two or three stalls or more. The purpose of the design is to leave a placeholder of some parking stalls whether it is for accessible requirements and/or for those who may drive to the park. M/Tanaka closed the Public Hearing. C/Tye asked staff about covering the control channel. If it is too small, so be it, but the flood control channel is covered at Diamond Bar Boulevard in a small area. He is not sure that covering the channel would lead to other NOVEMBER 19, 2013 PAGE 18 CITY COUNCIL problems with animals. If he were to make a motion it would be to continue the item to the next City Council meeting to discuss that option. He further stated that the City may be able to cut down the timing by reaching out to Supervisor Knabe, LA County Public Works and the Flood Control Channel District to get things moving quicker. This park will be here long after this Council has moved on but if five groups looked at that and saw a gaping hole through both sides of the park he found it hard to believe they would find that acceptable. CM/DeStefano stated that the City Council retains the discretion on this matter. The City Council has received a packet of information from its Planning Commission recommending that the City Council approve the package that contains a variety of documents within which are recommended Conditions of Approval. The City Council retains the discretion to approve or disapprove the project before it and to also modify, change, add and delete those conditions as the Council deems appropriate. The Council is the final decision maker in this process. Should C/Tye's colleagues agree with him by at least three members, staff can look into the issues a bit more. Staff is not in a position to provide an answer tonight as to whether or not that flood channel could or should be covered and what the timing, costs and components might be. Staff has seen a project similar to this project on Brea Canyon Road north of the SR60 at Lycoming where there is an AMPM gas station which once had an open flood control channel about 20 years ago. There is an open flood control channel on the west side of Brea Canyon Road and an open flood control channel just adjacent to Farmer Boys. Where it is covered is on Brea Canyon Road at Lycoming within that gas station which is partially why the gas station looks so big. It is because there was a flood control channel under the station that was covered and there are openings at both ends and whether there are critters or kids or anything else in there, there are openings at both ends and a design solution to that type of consideration. Staff would need to look at that type of design for this area to help the Council make a final decision and would also need to speak with the property owner which is not only Diamond Bar but the WVUSD, as well as the project applicant, Lennar. C/Tye said he would not be comfortable making it a condition of approval that the flood control channel be covered. He is comfortable asking staff to find out what would be involved in getting it done. He is also not comfortable to piecemeal the approvals and asked if it would be appropriate to continue the matter to the next City Council meeting. CM/DeStefano said it was within the Council's discretion to make a decision to continue the matter for further deliberation on the Council's part on December 3 or later. NOVEMBER 19, 2013 PAGE 19 CITY COUNCIL MPT/Everett said he was concerned about how much value there might be to covering the channel and asked if two weeks was enough time to consider all of the critical elements that might be involved. He was surprised that this concern was not voiced earlier because the City is strapped for space. M/Tanaka stated that when he and C/Tye attended some of the group meetings during which the park was discussed, at least two of the groups were looking at a different location within the property and placement of the park at the southwesterly corner was not the only location the residents were considering. M/Tanaka asked if the Council could move the rest of the project forward and consider the park element at a later date. CA/DeBerry said that the Council would have to condition the entire approval on the approval of the park element. There is also an agreement between Lennar and the School District as to when escrow must close. The City Council could continue the matter to the next meeting to see what information staff has been able to gather and consider whether the information would allow for a decision or another continuance. Mr. Smith said he understood the concern about covering the channel and understood that the City Council wanted additional time to make an informed decision. He wanted to convey that Lennar is in escrow and is anxious to deliver the escrow funds to the School District. He proposed that the City Council consider approving the Tentative Tract Map and all other elements of the entitlements because the channel is actually part of the City Park and there will be other opportunities as this project moves into the design phase. CDD/Gubman confirmed that the Planning Commission and City Council will again be reviewing the park element which might provide a more appropriate opportunity to cover the channel and still keeps the project on its path. CM/DeStefano said that the channel is not part of the park. The channel is owned, controlled, managed and maintained by the Los Angeles County Flood Control District. Should it be covered in the future it may or may not require some sort of configuration but it is not likely that the channel would ever become the property of the City of Diamond Bar. It would always remain the property of the LA County Flood Control system. What would be at issue which is a matter for future discussion on a variety of different levels would be the maintenance of the landscaping and/or whatever occurs on top of the control channel and whether that would be something the City would be responsible for as an adjunct to the adjacent City Park or would it be something that the City would do that the City may or may NOVEMBER 19, 2013 PAGE 20 CITY COUNCIL not be required to pay for. Those are details that would be way down the road and not something staff would discuss with the County at this point. Covering the channel could make it a component of the park and an asset but it would still remain under the ownership of the LA County Flood Control District. CA/DeBerry explained that as long as the December 3 meeting fits within the escrow timeline he is not sure why the Council would piecemeal the project. If the Council wants more information about covering the flood channel it could continue the item to the next meeting and limit the public comments to the covering of the channel if that was the change under consideration. C/Tye moved, C/Chang seconded, to continue Resolution No. 2013-34 to December 3, 2013 to give staff an opportunity to provide more information about the feasibility of covering the flood channel. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Chang, Herrera, Tye, MPT/Everett, M/Tanaka NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None C/Chang left the meeting 9:17 p.m. 8. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: 8.1 ADOPT ORDINANCE 03(C)(2013): IDENTIFYING THE TEMPORARY RELOCATION OF REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR TO DIAMOND BAR CITY HALL LOCATED AT 21810 COPLEY DRIVE AND AMENDING ORDINANCE NOS. 03, 3(A) AND 03(B) (2013). CC/Cribbins stated that during the Council meeting of November 5, staff recommended that the Council adopt Ordinance No. 03(B) (2013) allowing the City Council meeting for tonight's meeting to be held in the Windmill Room and following this evening's meeting, Ordinance 03 (2013) would automatically terminate at which time the City Council meetings would revert back to the SCAQMD Auditorium. Although the AQMD Auditorium has been completed and both AQMD and City staffs have had the opportunity to test the signal, adjustments need to be made to the audio portion in order to televise City Council meetings. Both the AQMD staff and City staff feel that the changes will be completed prior to the City Council set for December 3, 2013. However, in the event adjustments cannot be completed by November 27, 2013, staff recommends that the City Council hold its December 3 meeting in the City Hall Windmill Community Room. CA/DeBerry has placed a clause in Section 5 of NOVEMBER 19. 2013 PAGE 21 CITY COUNCIL Ordinance 03(C) (2013) which reads in part "... or in the event that the SCAQMD Auditorium becomes available for the meeting of December 3 this ordinance shall be, in its own terms, terminated and no longer be of any force and effect, and that the location of the City Council meeting will be governed by §2.08.01 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code. Therefore, -- - it is recommended that the City Council adopt Ordinance No. 03(C) (2013) as an urgency ordinance allowing the City Council meeting in the Windmill Community Room in the event that the Auditorium at the AQMD is unavailable. C/Herrera moved, C/Tye seconded, to Adopt Ordinance 03(C) (2013) as recommended. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Herrera, Tye, MPT/Everett, M/Tanaka NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Chang 9. COUNCIL SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS AND MEETING ATTENDANCE REPORTS/COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS: C/Herrera congratulated the Photo Contest Winners. She is sorry that Monsignor Loughnane left before he was able to see the gorgeous photo of the fountain at St. Denis Church. She congratulated newly elected Council Member C/Tye, C/Chang and Nancy Lyons and said she looked forward to serving with all. C/Tye wished Good Luck and Godspeed to Lt. Blasnek as he moves downtown. His efforts on behalf of Diamond Bar are greatly appreciated. He thanked Diamond Bar for the confidence voters showed him by electing him to a third City Council term. It is hard to believe that eight years have gone by and he appreciates everyone's confidence. Congratulations to Diamond Bar High School on its convincing CIF win against Downey High School, which was the reigning CIF Southeast Division Champion. Diamond Bar High School now moves on to the next level of the playoffs. Two weeks ago as the City's representative and President of Contract Cities he chaired the Executive Board meeting to discuss strategies to work to replace Redevelopment Agencies to perhaps put an initiative on the ballot to give cities the tools for economic development and job creation and looks forward to that initiative working its way through the process. Last week, he attended the LA County Vector Control District Ad -Hoc Committee meeting which recommended that the District hire from within to replace retiring General Manager Ken Bayless who has done an incredible job and leaves the organization much better than he found it. Truc Dever was selected from among NOVEMBER 19, 2013 PAGE 22 CITY COUNCIL three candidates to lead the District beginning in January. He asked that tonight's meeting be adjourned in memory of Harold Hofmann, longtime Mayor and Council Member of Lawndale. Harold was born and raised in Lawndale and served for 30 plus years on the Council and 20 years as the Mayor Harold- will be sorelymissedby his community and family. -Happy Thanksgiving to all! MPT/Everett said it was his privilege on November 6 to join M/Tanaka at the Friends of the Library Annual Community Librarian Appreciation luncheon for school librarians, principals and staff at the Diamond Bar Library. Superintendent Richard Martinez from PUSD and Superintendent Robert Taylor from WVUSD were present. He encouraged residents to partake of the local library's offerings the librarian spoke about earlier this evening. Increasing literacy and community are important. The next day he participated in the Veterans Day Celebration and thanked staff for another outstanding event which was a great patriotic event. He agreed with C/Tye in honor and memory of Harold Hoffman who served the City of Lawndale so graciously and convincingly for 38 years and also served on the Contract Cities in many capacities as well as, the County Library Commission. He encouraged everyone to take pride in the Willow Heights project. This is a great beginning for one of the best projects in the community's 25 years. He asked everyone to be aware of items that pass through the Planning Commission including the Americas Tire Company which has been in business for 54 years with 865 locations in 24 cities and is the largest and most successful retail tire company in the United States. The store will be located on Diamond Bar Boulevard at Cold Spring Lane. This is a national credit tenant and has a high rated reputation for being a good neighbor and community citizen. The minutes of the October 8 Planning Commission will provide you information about these new owners coming to town. He believes the same of Lennar Homes and looks forward to a relationship with them as a community partner. He has enjoyed his tour with the City Council and leaves as the Council prepares for its new term. Best wishes to all. M/Tanaka said he attended the Librarians Appreciation Luncheon and the PUSD School Board meeting. The Veterans Recognition Ceremony was a wonderful event and the City recognized 10 new veterans with plaques. He thanked CSC/Tarazon and her staff for coordinating the wonderful event. NOVEMBER 19, 2013 PAGE 23 CITY COUNCIL He participated in the International Police Station Visitors Survey during which a group of residents toured the Walnut/Diamond Bar Sheriff's Station and took a survey regarding the station's overall appearance, condition of furnishings, custody areas, etc. The survey was conducted by the Vera Institute of Justice in New York. Last weekend he helped deliver thank -you notes and cards written by members of the Diamond Bar High School Leo Club to the Long Beach VA Hospital on Saturday and to the Loma Linda VA Hospital on Sunday. He participated in the Wildlife Corridor Conservation Authority (WCCA) meeting which was held at the Brea Civic Center. He spoke to a class of 4th graders at Quail Summit Elementary School regarding the United States Government and duties of a mayor. On Wednesday he hosted the Cub Scouts from Pack 788 Den 9 who toured City Hall for the first time and was led by PIC/Arellano. Today was the LA Sanitation District 21 meeting during which the upcoming Christmas tree collection was discussed. In the future there may be a fee for recycling the trees. He thanked the Diamond Bar Community Foundation for honoring Diamond Bar as a community partner during a wonderful event held at the Diamond Bar Center. He wished everyone a Happy Thanksgiving Holiday and thanked Boy Scout Troop 730 and the High School for attending tonight's meeting. ADJOURNMENT: With no further business to conduct, M/Tanaka adjourned the Regular City Council Meeting at 9:29 p.m. in memory of Mayor Harold E. Hofmann, City of Lawndale, and Victims of the Philippines disaster. TOMMYE CRIBBINS, CITY CLERK The foregoing minutes are hereby approved this day of Mayor 2013. Agenda No. 6.2 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR MINUTES OF THE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION DIAMOND BAR CITY HALL - THE WINDMILL ROOM 21810 COPLEY DRIVE, DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 SEPTEMBER 26, 2013 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Dave Grundy called the Parks and Recreation Commission meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. in the City Hall Windmill Room, 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Vice Chairman Owens led,the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Lew Herndon, Dave Roberto, Vice Chairman Ted Owens, Chairman Dave Grundy Absent: Commissioner Benny Liang was excused. Staff Present: Bob Rose, Community Services Director; Anthony Jordan, Parks and Maintenance Superintendent; Christy Murphey, Recreation Superintendent; Alison Meyers, Community Services Coordinator; Ivania Perez, Community Services Leader Il, and Debbie Gonzales, Administrative Coordinator. PRESENTATION OF CERTIFICATES TO 2013 SUMMER VOLUNTEENS - CSC/Meyers and CSLII/Perez. Presentations were made. by Chair/Grundy, VC/Owens and Commissioners Herndon and Roberto. M/Tanaka and C/Chang were invited from the audience to participate in the presentation. RECESS: Chair/Grundy recessed the meeting at 7:28 p.m. RECONVENE: Chair/Grundy reconvened the meeting at 7:35 p.m. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE: Lew Herndon stated that fact number 1 is that Diamond Bar has thousands of kids who are involved in sports each year. Fact 2 is that Diamond Bar does not have enough sports fields for kids to play on, and fact 3 is that this problem is decades old with no foreseeable plans to solve this issue. Fact 4 is that there is an epidemic in Diamond Bar with only one in three students having recorded a passing grade in the physical fitness test. This evening he speaks as a concerned individual. He understands that through the sale of Site D the City could gain approximately $1.8 million from the sale of its property at Site D. He is currently gathering signatures on a petition that he presented to the Commission which asks the City to set aside the proceeds from the Site D sale to help solve the sports field problem. Within the last few months he has turned in over 1,400 signatures on this petition to the City Council and CM/DeStefano. He has an additional 300 signatures ready to turn in and he is still collecting signatures. He has collected about 95 percent SEPTEMBER 26, 2013 PAGE 2 P&R COMMISSION of the signatures. When he asks for signatures he asks if the individual is a resident of Diamond Bar and if the answer is yes, he asks if they are of voting age_ and if yes, he then asks if they would sign the petition. Those who have already signed the petition volunteer that they have done so and state that it would not be appropriate for them to sign more than once. A little over a year ago he began a quest to get many people to come to the Parks and Recreation Commission to help solve the problem. He is now reminded how it was to raise his six kids. After working hard all day there was transportation to baseball, football, choir, Boy Scouts, Campfire Girls, Y -Indian Guides, School Open House, play practice and tutors on top of helping with homework as well as, other parental responsibilities. He asked that the subject of this petition be placed on the November Parks and Recreation Commission agenda for discussion and possibly forwarding it to the City Council for adoption. CALENDAR OF EVENTS: As presented by CSD/Rose. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: C/Roberto moved, VC/Owens seconded, to approve the Consent Calendar as presented. Without objection, the motion was so ordered with C/Liang being absent. 1.1 Regular Meeting Minutes for August 22, 2013 — approved as corrected 1.2 Transmitted thank -you letter to Boy Scout Troop 8888 2. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 2.1 Recreation Program Update — RS/Murphey Chair/Grundy asked for a definition of Project Runway under the fall session of classes. RS/Murphey responded that it is a class for students who learn to design and model their clothing. Chair/Grundy remarked that the Commissioners were excited to see the number of kids and parents who filled the room tonight to participate in the Volunteen presentations. VC/Owens asked where "continue to schedule more classic rock bands during the (Concerts in the Park) series" came from. RS/Murphey said she believed those were the most popular -nights for the Concerts. CSD/Rose said that "more" does not mean additional nights, rather consistent with the number of classic rock concerts. 2.2 ParksReport— PMS/Jordan 2.2.1 Power Point Presentation on the Sycamore Canyon Park Mesa Trail — PMS/Jordan C/Herndon asked if the City had any recourse with respect to plant damage on the trail. PMS/Jordan responded "probably not" SEPTEMBER 26, 2013 PAGE 3 P&R because some of the issues were with programming of the irrigation system after the City took over the project. Quite a few plants remain. The cactus is thriving and the natives are taking off and it is his hope that once the rabbit situation is under control that the hydro seed and plants will begin to establish. CIP Proiects — CSD/Rose 2.3.2 Dog Park — CSD/Rose reported that the existing walkway will be connected to the entry gates. Geronimo Concrete was awarded the $37,200 contract. There will be three walkways and one staircase constructed as well. The dog park will be closed during construction. Staff has a pre -construction meeting next Tuesday and at that time, the schedule for the project will be determined. 2.3.3 Grandview Trail and Grandview Trail Link — CSD/Rose stated that plans went back to Building and Safety for a third plan check. Comments were forwarded to TKE today. Staff is hopeful that plans are close to being concluded so that the bid process can be started and a contractor engaged to begin construction. 2.3.4 Site D Park Design — CSD/Rose reported that the Commission will be discussing the draft conditions of approval for the Site D project by Lennar Homes. 2.3.5 Diamond Bar Center Improvements — CSD/Rose stated that the vast majority of the work has been completed. Guests have commented that they are impressed with the LED lighting above the stage and dance floor. Still to be finished are the doors to the offices which are on back order and expected to arrive about October 8. 2.4 List of Pending Commission Requests — None Offered. Chair/Grundy asked for and received unanimous concurrence from the Commissioners to place C/Herndon's request for consideration of a recommendation to the City Council regarding allocation of Site D City owned property sale proceeds to fund the Parks Master Plan on recommended projects the October 24 agenda. 3. OLD BUSINESS: None 4. NEW BUSINESS: 4.1 SITE D PARK CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - CSD/Rose presented staff's revised report. Once the developer has approval of the tentative tract map development will move forward. The Commission is considering the Conditions of Approval based on the public SEPTEMBER 26, 2013 PAGE 4 P&R COMMISSION input received from residents in the neighborhood and community at large. The developer incorporated those concepts into the conceptual plan that is being presented to the Commission tonight. The primary issue is that this is a general document, but if it is included in the conditions for approval the developer must include that in the project. Once the plans have passed through the plan check process, the park design that ultimately gets approved will have all of the details included in the final construction documents. No construction will be done until the plans are approved which must first be approved by the Community Development Director and Community Services Director, after which the plans will come to the Parks and Recreation Commission for its recommendation for Planning Commission approval. With respect to parking, there is no parking allowed along Brea Canyon Road or Diamond Bar Boulevard. The only other area that allows access to the site is at the cul-de-sac at Pasado Drive. The traffic engineer stated in the traffic study that for this to be a viable operation there would need to be a parking lot in the area coming off of Brea Canyon Road which is envisioned to be similar to the type of parking lot at Sycamore Canyon Park. There are public safety concerns because of the amount of traffic traveling down the narrow Castle Rock Road It is possible that people will park across the street and not use the crosswalk. Therefore, it is listed that the parking would be required at the City's discretion unless a better solution is provided that leaves the matter open to eliminating the parking lot. However, it is most likely that a parking lot will be included in the area. About 1.8 acres of the 2.2 acres available for the park/rain garden can be used for walkways, trails and seating areas. C/Herndon was concerned about the problems that might be created by a rain garden. PMS/Jordan said that staff looked at a similar project in Aliso Viejo. Essentially, the rain garden is a detention basin that has been architecturally enhanced. There are ponds below and from that point it slopes up. In terms of the maintenance, the plant material will be water borne plants such as cattails and similar types of plants conducive to a marshy environment. There will be decomposed granite trails throughout the area at slightly different elevations and nuisance water would not be at that level on a daily basis. In the event of a larger rain event such as a hundred year storm it would possibly submerge the development and would take 36 to 48 hours for the water to subside and the area to dry out. On the slopes the plant materials would be acacias, Xylosma and other similar type plants that are typical to many of the City's parks. In terms of maintenance it will be different and felt it would be overall manageable. CSD/Rose said that maintenance of the site has been a major portion of the discussion since early 2013 which was another reason for the site visit to Aliso Viejo. The City also received a maintenance proposal for maintaining the rain garden which was about 2.5 cents compared to usual park maintenance of 2 cents per square foot per month. The water SEPTEMBER 26, 2013 PAGE 5 P&R COMMISSION area will have fencing and gates which will normally be open for access to trails. However, if there is a large storm the gates would be locked to prevent access. The project in Aliso Viejo is a very nice amenity in the passive area of the park and the majority of the proposed park will be considered a very passive neighborhood park with a unique amenity that is not available at any other location in Diamond Bar. Chair/Grundy asked if the wrought iron fencing for the tot tot, protective - - -- fencing along Brea Canyon Road and protective fencing for the rain garden area should be shown on the plans and CSD/Rose said he was told that including the wrought iron fencing would provide too much detail for initial approval. Chair/Grundy felt it would be better to include detail if the Commission believes it should be included and CSD/Rose said it would be added. C/Herndon asked what a corner entry feature was and CSD/Rose explained that there is a Planning Department requirement in the development that there be an entry statement as part of this project. The Planning document speaks to a certain percentage to the. overall value of the development and the last number he saw was as much as $200,000. Staff felt a windmill would be appropriate. An entry statement will be something that represents Diamond Bar and is yet to be designed. Chair/Grundy asked if the conditions were subject to change after recommendation and CSD/Rose responded that the item most likely to change is at what point in the construction period the park would need to be completed. The other details are up to the Planning Commission. C/Roberto asked if all of the concerns about people walking along the south side of the development being able to look down into the back yards of residences had been addressed where there is a significant slope on the south side that goes down to the houses. Chair/Grundy suggested that a condition be added to provide for the planting of sufficient landscape to create a visual barrier (hedge) between the walkway/path and the houses down slope from Pasado to the rain garden. C/Herndon said he did not see swings on the plans. CSD/Rose said he would include "swings" for the tot lot. C/Herndon moved, VC/Owens seconded, to recommend Planning Commission approval of the Conditions of Approval for the Site D Park. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Herndon, Roberto, VC/Owens, Chair/Grundy NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Liang SEPTEMBER 26, 2013 PAGE 6 P&R CONEVRSSION 5. ANNOUNCEMENTS: VC/Owens thanked staff for the reports and said he was impressed by the number of people that were present for tonight's meeting. C/Herndon thanked staff for their usual great jobs, reports and hard work. He reported that he has suggested a proposal via email regarding the Pony League fields. The Diamond Bar Foundation appears willing to fund the rental of the Pony fields for the months of August, September and October which were reported to be critical months requiring additional space for sports organizations. The Pony League president suggested the fields might be rented for $200 per week so for the three months it would be a little less than $3,000. His recommendation was that a) the Diamond Bar Foundation provides one-half of the funds to the City and the City provides the other one-half and includes those fields in the City's field allocation system or b) if the City did not want to participate that the Foundation would fund the full amount. The president said he would present those options to his board and he presented the options to the Foundation and wanted feedback from the City as to the City's willingness to participate. C/Roberto thanked staff for the reports and thanked CSC/Meyers and her staff for the wonderful job with the Volunteen Programs. He agreed with C/Herndon that $3,000 for 3 months for allowing kids additional fields would not be a tremendous burden for the City to pay the entire amount and include the fields in the field allocation program. VC/Owens asked if the field allocation item should be placed on the agenda for October 24 in order for the Commission to make a formal recommendation to the City Council. CSD/Rose said he would do so with respect to the request from the Commission_ Chair/Grundy thanked the City for the Volunteen Program. Seeing such a large group at tonight's meeting and witnessing their enthusiasm and involvement he is glad that the program was not limited to a certain number. It is a good thing to get youth involved and he hoped that the City would continue to look for ways to invite and allow as many teens as possible to participate and have that opportunity. He congratulated and thanked CSC/Meyers and asked CSD/Rose to thank all of the other individuals who were involved in running such a great program. He thanked staff for the reports and all they do day in and day out. ADJOURNMENT: VC/Owens moved, C/Roberto seconded, to adjourn the Parks and Recreation Commission meeting. With no one objecting and no further business before the Parks and Recreation Commission, Chair/Grundy adjourned the meeting at 8:58 p.m. SEPTEMBER 26, 2013 PAGE 7 P&R COMMISSION The foregoing minutes are hereby approved this 18 day of November , 2013. itted, CRETARY Agenda No. 6.3 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR MINUTES OF THE TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING OCTOBER 10, 2013 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Mok called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Diamond Bar City Hall Windmill Community Room, 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California 91765. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Commissioner Carrera led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: Commissioners Ted Carrera, Liana Pincher, Peter Pirritano, Chairman Kenneth Mok Absent: Vice Chairman Jen "Fred" Mahlke was excused. Also Present: David Liu, Public Works Director; Kimberly Young, Associate Engineer; Sterling Mosley, Assistant Engineer; Christian Malpica, Associate Engineer (Traffic), and Marcy Hilario, Administrative Coordinator. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: A. Minutes of the September 12, 2013 Regular Meeting C/Carrera moved, C/Pirritano seconded, to approve the Minutes of the September 12, 2013 meeting as presented. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Carrera, Pincher, Pirritano, Chair/Mok NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: VC/Mahlke. 11. PUBLIC COMMENTS: None Offered. III. ITEMS FROM STAFF: A. Receive and File Traffic Enforcement Updates for: 1. Citations: July, August and September 2013 2. Collisions: July, August and September 2013 3. Street Sweeping: July, August and September 2013 OCTOBER 10, 2013 PAGE 2 T&T COMMISSION C/Carrera moved, C/Pirritano seconded, to receive and file the Traffic Enforcement Update reports for July, August and September 2013. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: APES: COMMISS104ERS: --_ Carrera, Pincher, Pirritano, Chair/Mok NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: VC/Mahlke IV. OLD BUSINESS: None V. NEW BUSINESS: A. Castle Rock Road/Crooked Creek Drive Neighborhood Traffic Management Program PWD/Liu gave a brief history of the program and assured residents that staff planned to move forward with the development of a traffic calming program to address the cut -through and speeding issues troubling the residents. The first phase is to focus on the current situation at the intersection of Castle Rock Road and Gold Run Drive where there is a lack of signage, striping and reflectors. It has been reported that drivers are maneuvering from lane to lane, failing to stop at stop signs, and have a basic disregard for other motorists and residents. The purpose of tonight's agenda item is to introduce the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program to residents so that they can come to understand the process which is a collaborative effort between staff and residents. This meeting was also intended to give residents an opportunity to state their concerns. AE/Malpica provided the Power Point Presentation and staff's report. Staff recommends that the Traffic and Transportation receive public comments from residents along Crooked Creek Drive, Gold Run Drive, Ambushers Street, Flapjack Drive, Running Branch Road and Castle Rock Road. Lita Eastman, 20839 Gold Run Drive, shared that she has lived in Diamond Bar for 35 years and her house is the only one at the bottom of Gold Run Drive, built before the tract was developed with streets running uphill. Since that time, their block wall has been run into and knocked over twice. The utility pole and electrical box were "taken out" in one of those accidents. Also, their mail box has been damaged twice, all by uncontrolled vehicles coming down Gold Run Drive. There are three bus stops on Gold Run Drive, an elementary, a middle school and a high school pickup along both sides of the street between Crooked Creek Drive and Castle Rock Road. Ms. Eastman has observed that bus drivers not only put the paddle stop sign out and red lights on; they actually get out of the bus to walk children across the street because OCTOBER 10, 2013 PAGE 3 T&T COMMISSION half of the cars fail to stop. She has a five-year-old living in her home now that plays in the yard and will occasionally go out to pick up the mail. The traffic on Gold Run Drive reminds her of Gold Rush Drive and those residents were able to have speed humps installed on the hill, which deters vehicles from traveling at a higher rate of speed. She does not believe additional stop signs would heti because- drivers --do not obey the stop stgrrs that are there now. -During — --- the past two days, she videotaped traffic traveling on Crooked Creek Drive to turn onto Gold Run Drive to leave the tract and only about 1 out of 10-15 cars stopped. She has seen utility trucks, gardeners, and residents fail to stop or make a stop out into the intersection because they catch sight of someone coming down the hill. Ms. Eastman offered to provide the Commission and staff with photos and video. Nick Prokop, 20909 Gold Run Drive, stated that contraryto his wishes, the City has approved Plan D (Site D Development) and was told that the traffic engineer said that Plan D would not cause any more traffic in Diamond Bar. He feels this is not true. When drivers get caught up in traffic going back into Orange County, he believes they will cut through the tract to avoid the SR - 57l60 split during construction. He contacted Public Works staff approximately six months to a year ago expressing his concerns. Public Works staff responded to Mr. Prokop's concerns by installing a "Watch Your Speed" sign two houses up from him. Another concern is that he can hardly back out of his driveway and he suggests also installing some striping on the roadway. He observes people go up and down the street 40 to 50 miles an hour. At night, he can hear cars racing up the hill because they think it is a racetrack. Mr. Prokop understands that the Sheriff's deputy can only stay at a location for so long. He anticipates that the Plan D (Site D Development) project will only cause more drivers to cut through that part of the neighborhood. Susan Scarbrough, 3540 Crooked Creek Drive, lives one house from the corner of Gold Run Drive and Crooked Creek Drive, next door to Mrs. Eastman. She concurred with all of the observations expressed by her neighbors, which she has personally observed during the past 10 years she has lived in her home. Mitigation measures to help stop vehicles from careening around the corners would be in order. Thomas Trujillo, 3537 Castle Rock Road, stated that he recently put up a camera to record how vehicles cut the corner. It seems to him that staff might have missed people cutting the corner at Castle Rock Road and Gold Run Drive during the traffic study and he suggested that speed humps might be the best deterrent. He has video posted on www.dbcam4.nip.orq Mr. Trujillo stated that he spoke with (Mayor) Jack Tanaka about this issue on Tuesday at the meeting of the Planning Commission regarding Site D. We know there is going to be additional traffic and when construction starts on Site D, there will be more issues. These issues need to be addressed now instead of waiting for Site D. OCTOBER 10, 2013 PAGE 4 T&T COMMISSION Eleanor Boruah, 3748 Castle Rock Road, a 25 -year resident of Diamond Bar, signed the petition and thought it would include the south end of Castle Rock Road at Silver Bullet Drive, where she lives. Drivers speed through the area. She thinks speed humps would help slow down the traffic in her area and she believes the problem started when Grand Avenue was opened to Chino Hills ---------- -- traffic --Ms-. Boruak-stated-that_ she andherhusban-d-canmot_turn left -at the________ _ signal at Silver Bullet Drive because traffic is so bad and she would have to wait a long time. She uses Cold Springs Lane to come down Ambushers Street to come through Crooked Creek Drive to get to Castle Rock Road to get home and avoid the signal. Gary Busteed, 20850 Gold Run Drive, said he appreciated the Commission allowing this dialogue and felt it was good to have an opportunity to talk about options for the area. A number of residents have waited for years. His aunt and uncle used to live in the house he now lives in. This has been a recurring problem for many years and he did not think there was anything residents could suggest for solutions to the problem. Part of the problem is that Diamond Bar has been going through a lot of changes and he has noticed younger people moving into neighborhoods. He felt it was really important to consider the options and looks forward to hearing what the City's engineer suggests as the safest options. C/Carrera stated that Phase I appeared to include the southerly portion of Castle Rock Road. PWD/Liu responded that C/Carrera was correct. This study will look at the entire length of Castle Rock Road to the very end of the cul-de-sac. Mike Perez, 3422 Castle Rock Road, thanked the Commissioners for their time and service. He shares his neighbor's frustration. He understands the need for data and study. He is concerned about Site D which he believes will change the dynamic of the traffic and the entire study area is already impacted. Coming south on Diamond Bar Boulevard, he would usually turn onto Brea Canyon Road south and turn left onto Copper Canyon Drive. However, after 5:00 p.m. he does not use that route. He chooses to travel up and around. Mr. Perez feels that if he is doing that, he is certainly not the only one that has figured. out that the back/long way is better. He is concerned about the amount of traffic. With all due respect to the law enforcement officer who is present tonight, he sees the"signs "we're watching you" which are totally ineffective. It is easy to talk about studies and say it takes time. He does not doubt staff's sincerity or integrity but he believes the risks would increase with Site D. He asked the Commission and staff to proceed with all speed and implement measures as quickly as possible. Harlan Curtis has lived at 3528 Castle Rock Road since 1965 (corner of Castle Rock Road and Gold Run Drive). Trying to get out of his driveway to get to work every morning was sometimes impossible. Vehicles did not stop at the stop sign most of the time, which has been the problem all along. Gold Run Drive has been like a motor speedway with people driving around the corner OCTOBER 10, 2013 PAGE 5 T&T COMMISSION and going up and down the hill at high speeds. The situation is terrible both during the day and at night. He and Mr. Trujillo collected signatures for the petition and are probably most responsible for making this meeting happen. His concern was getting speed humps put in behind his house on Gold Run Drive and the next street because there is no stop sign coming down the hill to —his comer.—Hewou[d also -tike to -sera -speed -hu Road going north and south. C/Carrera asked during what period the data was collected. PWD/Liu responded that this survey was conducted over a four or five day weekday period for 24 -hours back to back. C/Carrera sensed it was typical that higher speeds are during commuting time and PWD/Liu responded that C/Carrera was correct. The peak hours show the trend. C/Carrera asked if there were any NTMP's previously done in this area. PWD/Liu responded no and said that he was not aware of any contact prior to submission of the petition in September 2012. There may have been calls or correspondence to City Hall about specific issues or conditions; however, in terms of the NTMP approach, this discussion did not take place prior to September 2012. C/Pincher asked if anything had been determined with respect to the slope of the downhill that would eliminate certain mitigation measures for speeding vehicles, which are usually driven by neighbors who live in the area. PWD/Liu responded that in terms of the slope conditions along Gold Run Drive, he does not have specific numbers. However, there are specific criteria and standards that must be met. Generally speaking, any grade over 5 percent becomes an issue. Based on past experience working on similar streets in the City, such as Gold Rush Drive, the mitigation measure installed was Bots Dots which are not speed humps or speed cushions. However, this does not eliminate the opportunity for speed cushions, as long as they are strategically placed and very steep areas are avoided. This is the reason the City has to be very certain that it conducts a complete engineering study. As a reminder, speed' cushions are not the only tool in the toolbox that can be used to try to discourage people from speeding. C/Pincher said she was not familiar with the neighborhood and said the reason for her question was that the area appears very hilly. She is also not familiar with what people are calling "the back way." A speaker responded from the audience using the map. PWD/Liu stated that based on the concerns voiced by the residents who are present this evening, staff will make a genuine effort to expedite the process. The facts are in evidence in terms of the speeding and cut -through traffic. The data that has been collected to date supports the issues of speeding and cut -through traffic. At the same time, when more than 300 notices have been sent out, more residents need to be involved so that they can be fully aware of this program and participate in a dialogue with staff members. Staff will follow up with everyone present this evening and we will strive to get more people involved. Staff will be sensitive to the residents' needs but more importantly, OCTOBER 10, 2013 PAGE 6 T&T COMMISSION staff intends to do this the correct way with a very thorough study and follow up will occur as quickly as possible. PWD/Liu said he wants to have another meeting with neighborhood residents, and at that meeting he will provide an initial set of recommendations specific to the issues stated this evening. This is a starting point; however, the City must conduct a thorough study and -- -- bottom+-line-is-thatwhat€ver-mitigation- measures _are -ultimately _ installed, if the_y_____ are not done correctly, or if they have not been properly engineered and thoroughly considered, there will be liability issues. He was pleased to see the number of individuals who have participated in tonight's meeting because staff had no idea how many folks including those outside of Castle Rock Road and Gold Run Drive might appear this evening. Chair/Mok asked if residents would be notified in the same manner as they were for this meeting. PWD/Liu responded absolutely, via mail. C/Carrera moved, C/Pirritano seconded, to receive and file public comments. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: VI. STATUS OF PREVIOUS ACTION ITEMS: VII. ITEMS FROM COMMISSIONERS VIII. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: Carrera, Pincher, Pirritano, Chair/Mok None VC/Mahlke None None, A. CCN Project. AE/Malpica reported that there were issues with the work performed; therefore, the project will be completed within the next two weeks. B. Median Project at Grand Avenue and Summitridge Drive/Diamond Bar Boulevard at Silver Hawk. AE/Malpica stated that staff scheduled a pre -construction meeting for October 24th with the contractor. If all goes well, the contractor will complete the work before the end of December. C. Traffic Signal Operation and Maintenance Master Plan. AE/Malpica reported that staff has provided final comments to the consultant. The consultant will respond to staff early next week with the final report. OCTOBER 10, 2013 PAGE 7 T&T COMMISSION If there are any further comments, the report will be going back to the consultant to be finalized by the week of October 215r D. Diamond Bar Traffic Responsive Plan/System — _- — AE/fvtatpica indicated that staff, -our cartsuftant-and ttre-vendof were-able-to— activate the traffic responsive system. On Monday, staff and the consultant noticed that the system kicked in twice in the morning. E. New Traffic Signage/Striping — Meadowglen Road/Silver Rain Drive AE/Malpica shared that in response to residents' concerns, staff offered that the neighborhood could consider the NTMP; however, they declined the offer and requested educational signage only. Based on their decision, staff installed the signage last week. F. ACE Fairway Drive Grade Separation Project AE/Malpica reported that as of today, staff has not received any comments back from ACE. If comments are received, staff and the City's traffic consultant will review those comments and respond accordingly in anticipation of receiving the final report. The project is scheduled to begin by the end of 2014. G. Area 1 B/Zone 7 Roadway Maintenance Project. AENoung conveyed that the majority of the work has been completed; however, striping along Mountain Laurel Way, east of Diamond Bar Boulevard and Quail Summit Drive, was substandard. During the past several weeks, staff members have worked with the primary contractor and the striper sub- contractor to devise a remedy to repair the striping to bring it up to the quality standards Diamond Bar is used to seeing. The job specifications include the statement that "any deficient striping will need to replaced and repaired by a reslurry of the entire street from gutter to gutter." After looking at these two areas, it was determined that the portion along Mountain Laurel Way will need to be reslurried from gutter to gutter because there are too many types of deficiencies; however, the contractor asked for permission to attempt a third coat of striping, which they believe will repair most, if not all, of the deficiencies that exist along the stretch of Quail Summit Drive. Staff will make the final determination of whether the deficiencies have been satisfactorily repaired and if a slurry seal is still warranted according to the specifications after the third coat has been applied. Chaparral Middle School staff informed City staff they did not want another slurry seal because it would be an inconvenience to school traffic. Staff is hoping the third coat of restriping will remedy the issues and will not require a slurry seal. The restriping along Quail Summit Drive was originally scheduled for last Saturday, October 5th; however, due to unusually high winds, the work was rescheduled for Saturday, October 12`h. The slurry seal along Mountain Laurel Way and potentially along Quail Summit Drive is OCTOBER 10, 2013 PAGE 8 T&T COMMISSION scheduled for the following Saturday, October 19th. Once the striping deficiencies are repaired, the project will be completed and the Notice of Completion will be taken to City Council shortly thereafter. Chair/Mok asked for a definition of "deficient or substandard striping." -- — — — — — — AEN&ng- explained -that-the stap4egend-stenc-aan9Mounta r-LauraL Way— was — — -- — not properly lined between coats. There are also wavy lines that should be straight and some tracking as well as paint splatter. Along Quail Summit Drive, there was an equipment malfunction during the centerline striping at Diamond Bar Boulevard where the center black line of the double yellow line has splattered onto the yellow. Also, the first and second coat of the "skip" line did not properly line up. The subcontractor believes that with application of a third coat, it can be evened out to mitigate the deficiencies and remain within tolerances. C/Carrera asked if the contractor was contracted through the City or if it was a subcontractor of a primary contractor. AE/Young responded that the primary contract was awarded to Hardy and Harper and the striping contractor, BC Traffic Specialist, was the sub -contractor who did.the striping. The contract is between the City and Hardy and Harper; therefore, ultimately, Hardy and Harper is responsible. H. Southern California Edison Infrastructure Upgrades. AE/Young stated that the majority of what is termed "civil" work has been completed. All of the trenching and all of the final paving has been completed in both the Mountain Laurel Way, west of Diamond Bar Boulevard, and Sunset Crossing Road neighborhoods. The next phase will be Edison pulling cable through the newly laid conduit. Staff expects the work to proceed through the next six weeks, once Edison can schedule its crews to complete the work. Final pavement restoration is required for the Sunset Crossing Road neighborhood, which will not be done until the cable has been pulled. The final pavement rehab (slurry seal and striping) will occur after the final cable is pulled. There is no final rehab for the Mountain Laurel Way neighborhood because it is part of the Area 2 Road Rehabilitation Project scheduled for next summer. The entire neighborhood, including the areas of the Edison work, will be done at that time. Final striping will be completed around Chaparral Middle School and Maple Hill Elementary School when Sunset Crossing Road is restriped. Staff hopes the cable pull will be completed within the next six weeks and the slurry and striping shortly thereafter. IX. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE CITY EVENTS: As stated in the agenda. Chair/Mok highlighted Items I and L, stating his hope that everyone would exercise their right to vote on November 5th and participate in the Veterans' Day Holiday Celebration. OCTOBER 10, 2013 PAGE 9 T&T COMMISSION ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to come before the Traffic and Transportation Commission, Chair/Mok adjourned the meeting at 8:24 p.m. Respectfully, David G. Liu, Secretary Attest: Ch Irman Kenneth Mok CITY COUNCIL TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Agenda # g , -4__ Meeting Date: December 3, 2013 AGENDA REPORT FROM: James DeStefano, City Ma TITLE: Ratification of Check Register dated November 14, 2013 through November 27, 2013 totaling $ 1,673,684.76 RECOMMENDATION: Ratify. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Expenditure of $ 1,673,684.76 in City funds. BACKGROUND: The City has established the policy of issuing accounts payable checks on a weekly basis with City Council ratification at the next scheduled City Council meeting. DISCUSSION: The attached check register containing checks dated November 14, 2013 through November 27, 2013 for $ 1,673,684.76 is being presented for ratification. All payments have been made in compliance with the City's purchasing policies and procedures. Payments have been reviewed and approved by the appropriate departmental staff and the attached Affidavit affirms that the check register has been audited and deemed accurate by the Finance Director. PREPARED BY: Luisa Fua Accounting Technician REVIEWED BY: Finance Director `J Attachments: Affidavit and Check Register— 11/14/13 through 11/27/13. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR CHECK REGISTER AFFIDAVIT The attached listings of demands, invoices, and claims in the form of a check register including checks dated November 14, 2013 through November 27, 2013 has been audited and is certified as accurate. Payments have been allowed from the following funds in these amounts: Description Amount General Fund $1,245,435.47 Prop A - Transit Fund $5,621.32 Prop C - Transit Tax Fund $7,589.97 Integrated Waste Mgt Fund $8,914.14 AB2766 - Air Qlty Mgt Fund $15,500.00 Comm Dev Block Grand Fund $390.50 LLAD 38 Fund $28,816.32 LLAD 39 Fund $22,009.86 LLAD 41 Fund $10,369.96 Capital Imp Projects Fund $80,797.25 PFA - Debt Service Fund $244,449.93 Computer Equipment Replacement Fund $3,790.04 $1,673,684.76 Signed: Dianna Honeywell Finance Director City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 11/14/2013 thru 11/27/2013 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct # Amount Total Check Amount Check Date Check Date 11/14/2013 105932 ALEXANDER & LYNN INC CONTRACT CLASS -FALL 0015350 45320 621.00 $621.00 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 105935 CDW GOVERNMENT COMP EQ - LT 0014070 41200 62.14 $318.66 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 1 105933 AMERICOMPGROUP TONERS -PRINTERS 0014070 41200 1 746.61 $746.61 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 MAINT SVCS-C/HALL CDW GOVERNMENT COMP EQ- J. 0014070 41200 208.56 11/14/2013 1 105934 ICALIFORNIA CONTRACT CITIES ASSOC. MTG-CMGR10114/13 0014030 1 42325 1 2SOC)l $25.00111/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 105935 CDW GOVERNMENT COMP EQ - LT 0014070 41200 62.14 $318.66 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 COW GOVERNMENT COMP EQ - LT 0014070 41200 47.96 '', 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 MAINT SVCS-C/HALL CDW GOVERNMENT COMP EQ- J. 0014070 41200 208.56 ''. 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 1 105936 CITY OF SIGNAL HILL WATERSHED MGT PROG 0015510 44240 119,470 00 $119,470,00111/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 105937 CNC PRINTWERKS CNC PRINTWERKS PRINT SVCS -BUS CARD PRINTING SUPPLIES 0014090 0014090 42110 42110 7085 207.10 $277.95 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 1 11/14/2013 1 105938 IMICHELLE DELA CRUZ RECREATION REFUND 001 34780 1 52 00 1 $52.00111/14/2013 111/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 DIAMOND BAR HAND CAR WASH CAR WASH -PW 0015554 42200 35.09 '', 11/14/2013 1 105939 DAY LITE MAINTENANCE CO INC MAINT SVCS-C/HALL 0014093 42210 1 96.00 ',$96.00 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 EXCEL LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE MAINT-DIST#41 1415541 45500 11/14/2013 1 105940 PABLITO DELA CRUZ FACILITY REFUND 001 23002 1 500.00 $500.00111/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 1 105941 ICAROLA DENNIS IPROF SVCS-CNCL MTG 0014030 1 44000 1 75.00 $75,00111/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 105942 DH MAINTENANCE DH MAINTENANCE DH MAINTENANCE MAINT SVCS -CITY HALL MAINT SVCS -DBC MAINT SVCS -PARKS 0014093 0015333 0015340 42210 45300 42210 6,500.00 12,250.83 735.17 $19,486.00 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 105943 DIAMOND BAR HAND CAR WASH CAR WASH -POOL VEHICLES 0014090 42200 228.82 $276.81 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 DIAMOND BAR HAND CAR WASH CAR WASH -PW 0015554 42200 35.09 '', 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 DIAMOND BAR HAND CAR WASH CAR WASH -COMM SVCS 0015310 42200 12.99 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 1 11/14/2013 1 105944 1DOG DEALERS INC ICONTRACT CLASS -FALL 1 0015350 1 45320 1 90,001 $90,00111/14/2013 111/14/2013 1 11/14/2013 1- 105945 JEMERALD LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC ILANSCAPE MAINT-C/HALL 0014093 1 42210 1 840.001 $840.00 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11114/2013 105946 EXCEL LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE MAINT-PARK 0015340 45300 325.00 $27,797-82 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 EXCEL LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE MAINT-DIST #38 1365538 45500 11,718.00 '', 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 EXCELLANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE MAINT-DIST#39 1395539 45500 11,610.95 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 EXCEL LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE MAINT-DIST#41 1415541 45500 4,143.87 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 Page 1 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 11/14/2013 thru 11/27/2013 Check Date ICheck Number) Vendor Name ADULT EXCURSION TRANSP Transaction Description 45310 Fund/ Dept Acct # Amount I Total Check Amount I Check Date I Check Date CORAREYES GOLD COAST TOURS ADULT EXCURSION TRANSP 1125350 45310 1032.0 ''. 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 105947 KIRK FERMIN FACILITY REFUND 001 23002 700.00 $700.00 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 IFACILITY REFUND 1 001 1 36615 1 1,255.00 $2,337.85111/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 105954 11/14/2013 105948 CZARINNEFETALINO FACILITY REFUND 001 23002 350,001 $350.00 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11114/2013 105949 GOLDCOASTTOURS ADULT EXCURSION TRANSP 0015350 45310 842.74 $1;874.80 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 CORAREYES GOLD COAST TOURS ADULT EXCURSION TRANSP 1125350 45310 1032.0 ''. 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 1 105950 ANGELA GRIFFITH RECREATION REFUND 001 34780 1 71.00 ',$71.00 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 105951 KOA CORPORATION DB SIGNAL MASTER PLAN 2505510 46412 387.50 $2"',580.10 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 i 1/14/2013 CORAREYES KOACORPORATION DB TRAFFIC SVCS 1135510 44000 2,192.60 ''. 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 1 105952 LETTY LEDESMA FACILITY REFUND 001 23002 1 700.00 $700.00 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 CORAREYES MOBILEINDUSTRIALSUPPLY INCORP CYLINDER ARGON 0015350 42130 24.00 ''. 11/14/2013 105953 LEWIS ENGRAVING INC. MAGNETS -BADGES 0014090 1 42113 8.55 ''.. $8.55111/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 IFACILITY REFUND 1 001 1 36615 1 1,255.00 $2,337.85111/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 105954 SARA MITCHELL FACILITY REFUND 001 23002 1 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 105955 MOBILE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY MCORP CYLINDERARGON 0015340 41200 8.00 ',$32.00 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 CORAREYES MOBILEINDUSTRIALSUPPLY INCORP CYLINDER ARGON 0015350 42130 24.00 ''. 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 1 105956 NEOGOV SET-UP BTRAINING 1185098 1 46235 1 71000.00 $T'.,000.00 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 1i/14/2013 105957 NESTLE PURE LIFE DIRECT EQ RENTAL -DBC 0015333 42130 11.98 ',$60.94 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 CORAREYES NESTLE PURE LIFE DIRECT WATER SUPPLIES -DBC 0015333 41200 48.96 ',, 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 105958 ORKIN PEST CONTROL INC PEST CONTROL-BREACYN1385538 0014093 45500 63.37 $218.66 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 CORAREYES ORKIN PEST CONTROL INC PEST CONTROL-SYC CYN 0015340 42210 66.06 ',, 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 ORKIN PEST CONTROL INC PEST CONTROL-PANTERA 0015340 42210 8923 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 1 105959 PAETEC COMMUNICATIONS INC. LONG DIST PH-SEPT/OCT 0014090 1 42125 1 618.21 $618.21 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 105960 PROTECTION ONE INC ALARM SVCS -CITY HALL 0014093 42210 25.15 ',,$66.65 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 CORAREYES PROTECTION ONE INC ALARM SVCS-SYC CYN 0015340 42210 41.50 1 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 Page 2 11/14/2013 105961 CORAREYES RECREATION REFUND 001 34780 1 71.00 '..$71.00 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 105962 VIJAY SHARMA IFACILITY REFUND 1 001 1 36615 1 1,255.00 $2,337.85111/14/2013 11/14/2013 Page 2 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 11/14/2013 thru 11/27/2013 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct # Amount Total Check Amount Check Date Check Date 11/14/2013 105962... VIJAY SHARMA FACILITY REFUND 001 23002 700.00 $2,3$285...11/14/2013 25.75 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 VIJAY SHARMA FACILITY REFUND 001 23004 176.15 '', 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 VIJAY SHARMA FACILITY REFUND 001 36610 206.70 42126 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 1 105963 SMART & FINAL SUPPLIES -SR CLUB 0015350 41200 41 75 '..$41 75 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 105966 11/14/2013 105964 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS-TRFFC CNTRL 0015510 42126 31.82 $540.09 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 FACILITY REFUND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS-TRFFC CNTRL 0015510 42126 25.75 ',. 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 FACILITY REFUND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS-TRFFC CNTRL 0015510 42126 33.69 '',. 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 360.00 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS-TRFFC CNTRL 0015510 42126 53.95', 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS-TRFFC CNTRL 0015510 42126 33.43 "', 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS-TRFFC CNTRL 0015510 42126 7548 ',. 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/1412013 11/14/2013 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS-TRFFC CNTRL 0015510 42126 33.43 '', 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS-TRFFC CNTRL 0015510 42126 33.43 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11114/2013 ITHE COMDYN GROUP INC SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS-TRFFCGNTRL 0015510 42126 41.79 '', 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS-TRFFC CNTRL 0015510 42126 44.35'',. 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS-TRFFC CNTRL 0015510 42126 92.52 'I, 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS-TRFFC CNTRL 0015510 42126 4045 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 105965 SPARKLETTS EQ RENTAL-SYC PARK 0015340 42130 12.00 $105.02 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 SPARKLETTS WATERSUPPLIES 0015340 41200 59.94 '', 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 SPARKLETTS WATER SUPPLIES 0015340 41200 29.97 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 SPARKLETTS WATER SUPPLIES 0015340 42130 3.11 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 105966 NIARTHASTOKES FACILfTYREFUND 001 23002 350.00 $31,036,15111/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 DAVIDTAIT MARTHA STOKES FACILITY REFUND 001 23004 176.15 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 MARTHA STOKES FACILITY REFUND 001 36615 2,510.00 ''.. 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 Page 3 11/14/2013 105967 DAVIDTAIT CONSULTING SVCS -OCT 0015551 1 45221 1 3,600.00 $3,600.00 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 105968 SIU KI TAM CONTRACT CLASS -FALL 0015350 45320 1 360.00 360.00 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 1 105969 JOE TATA FACILITY REFUND 001 23002 1 200.00 $200.00111/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 1 105970 TERRY'S TESTING INC BACKFLOWTEST 0015333 1 42210 1 50.00 '$50.00111/1412013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 1 105971 ITHE COMDYN GROUP INC ICONSULTING SVCS-JRDR 0014070 1 44000 1 1,168.32 $2,669.25111/14/2013 11/14/2013 Page 3 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 11/14/2013 thru 11/27/2013 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct # Amount I Total Check Amount Check Date Check Date 11/14/2013 105971... THE COMDYN GROUP INC CONSULTING SVCS-JLETZ 0014070 44000 1,500.93 52,66925...11/14/2013 WATER SVCS -PARKS 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 1 105972 JIMMYE LOU THIES ICONTRACTCLASS-FALL1 0015350 1 45320 1 432.001 $432.00111/14/2013 111/14/2013 11/14/2013 1 105973 TRI -CITIES POOL SERVICE & REPAIR FOUNTAIN MAINT-OCT 0015333 1 45300 160.00 $160.00 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 105974 VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE MAINT INC VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE MAINT INC ADD'L WORK -P, ADD'L WORK-PANTERA 0015340 0015340 42210 42210 151.83 410.87. $562.70 "'. 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 105975 WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WATER SVCS -PARKS 0015340 42126 19,447.28 $55'',,457.52 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WATER SVCS -DIST #38 1385538 42126 14,882.11 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/21/2013 WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WATER SVCS -DIST #39 1395539 42126 10,398.91', 76.00 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WATER SVCS -DBC 0015333 42126 328.16 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 AECOM WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WATER SVCS -C HALL 0014093 42126 813.51 ',. 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WATER SVCS -DIST 38 1385538 42126 1,358.40 '', 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 001 WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WATER SVCS -PARKS 0015340 42126 2054.58 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 WALNUT VALLEYWATER DISTRICT WATER SVCS -DIST 41 1415541 42126 6,174.57 ARC IMAGING RESOURCES 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/14/2013 1 105976 IALBERTOYAP ICONTRACTCLASS-FALLI 0015350 1 45320 1 90.001 ',$90.00111/14/2013 111/14/2013 11/14/2013 105977 CASYZHAI RECREATION REFUND 001 34780 1 54.00 $54.00111/14/2013 11/14/2013 11/21/2013 105978 AARP AARP MATURE DRIVING 0015350 1 45300 1 76.00 $76.00111/21E013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 105979 AECOM PROF.SVCS-D/B HONDA 0014096 1 44000 1 31,400.00 $3¶,400.00111/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 105980 DOUGLASAMAYA FACILITY REFUND-PANTERA 001 23002 150.00 150,00111/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 1 105981 ARC IMAGING RESOURCES COMPMAINT-PRINTER 0014070 1 42205 14.05 ''.$14.05 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 105982 ARTESIAOFSKATING TRAINING CTR LL CONTRACT CLASS -FALL 0015350 1 45320 99,001 $99.00 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 105983 BENESYST FLEX ADMIN SVCS-DEC2013 0014060 1 42346 100.00 $100.00 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 105984 BENESYST 11/22/13-P/R DEDUCTIONS 001 21105 1 666.69 $866.69 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 105985 CAROLINACARROLL CIMNLAPPREHENSION REWARD 0014411 1 42361 1 500.00 $500.00111/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 1 105986 ICDW GOVERNMENT COMP MAINT-CISCO 1 1185098 1 42205 1 8,500001 $28,245.00 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 Page 4 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 11/14/2013 thru 11/27/2013 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct # Amount I Total Check Amount Check Date Check Date 11/21/2013 1 105986._ CDW GOVERNMENT ICOMP MAINT-CISCO 0014070 1 42205 19,745.00 $28,245.00... 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 105993 DAVID EVANS ANDASSOCIATES INC PROF.SVCS-FPL 2012482 001 23010 470.00 $1,,,701.05 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 105987 CITY OF WEST COVINA FORENSIC SVCS-JUL-SEPT 0014411 1 45402 1 715.00 715.00 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES INC ADMIN FEES -FPL 2012-482 001 34430 -84.60 11/21/2013 105988 CNCPRINTWERKS PRINT SVCS -BUS CARDS 0014090 1 42110 1 70.85 1,$70.85 11/21/2013 717TV2013 344.82 �I, 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 DAVID EVANS ANDASSOCIATES INC ADMIN FEES -FPL 2012-482 001 11/21/2013 1 105989 CONSTRUCTION HARDWARE CO HARDWARE -DBC 0015333 1 46410 192.93 $192.93 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 001 34430 -62.07 $4'.„109.07 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 DAVID EVANS ANDASSOCIATES INC 11/21/2013 105990 CORNERSTONE RECORDS MGMT LLC OFF-SITE STORAGE -OCT 13 0014070 1 45000 1 645301 645.30 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 DAVID EVANS ANDASSOCIATES INC ADMIN FEES -FPL 2013-229 001 23010 43.42 $96.00 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 105991 BALI DABGOTRA FACILITY REFUND -DBC 001 36615 1 40000 $400.00111121/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 105998 DAVID EVANS ANDASSOCIATES INC PROF.SVCS-FPL 2012-461 001 23010 645.00 $180.00111/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 105992 DAPEERROSENBLIT&LITVAKLLP LEGAL SVCS -GENERAL OCT 0014020 1 44023 1 3,604.23 $31„604,23 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES INC ADMIN FEES -FPL 2012-461 001 34430 -116.10 11/21/2013 105993 DAVID EVANS ANDASSOCIATES INC PROF.SVCS-FPL 2012482 001 23010 470.00 $1,,,701.05 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 105994 DAVID EVANS ANDASSOCIATES INC ADMIN FEES -FPL 2012-482 001 23010 84.60 $500.00 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES INC ADMIN FEES -FPL 2012-482 001 34430 -84.60 1 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 105995 DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES INC PROF.SVCS-FPL 2012-482 001 23010 344.82 �I, 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 DAVID EVANS ANDASSOCIATES INC ADMIN FEES -FPL 2012-482 001 23010 62.07 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/2112013 105996 DAVID EVANS ANDASSOCIATES INC ADMIN FEES -FPL 2012482 001 34430 -62.07 $4'.„109.07 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 DAVID EVANS ANDASSOCIATES INC PROF.SVCS-FPL 2013-229 001 23010 241.23 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 105997 DAVID EVANS ANDASSOCIATES INC ADMIN FEES -FPL 2013-229 001 23010 43.42 $96.00 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 DAVID EVANS ANDASSOCIATES INC ADMIN FEES -FPL 2013-229 001 34430 -43.42 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 105998 DAVID EVANS ANDASSOCIATES INC PROF.SVCS-FPL 2012-461 001 23010 645.00 $180.00111/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 DAVID EVANS ANDASSOCIATES INC ADMIN FEES -FPL 2012-461 001 23010 116.10 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES INC ADMIN FEES -FPL 2012-461 001 34430 -116.10 "' 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 105999 DFS FLOORING CORP CARPETMAINT-C/HALL OCT 0014093 42210 550.00 $3,045.00 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 105994 1 BARBARA DECARBO CRMNL APPREHENSION REWARD 0014411 1 42361 1 500.00 $500.00 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 105995 1 DELTA CARE USA DEC 13 -DENTAL PREMIUMS 001 21104 1 224.53 $224.53 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 105996 DELTA DENTAL DEC 2013 DENTAL PREMIUMS 001 21104 4,109.07 $4'.„109.07 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 1 105997 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FINGERPRINT SVCS -HIR 0014060 42345 96.001 $96.00 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 1 105998 MAYADEVI CONTRACT CLASS -FALL 0015350 45320 180.00 $180.00111/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 105999 DFS FLOORING CORP CARPETMAINT-C/HALL OCT 0014093 42210 550.00 $3,045.00 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 DFS FLOORING CORP CARPET MAINT-LIBRARY OCT 0014093 42210 1,860.00 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 Page 5 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 11/14/2013 thru 11/27/20 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct # Amount Total Check Amount Check Date Check Date 11/21/2013 105999... DFS FLOORING CORP CARPET MAINT-LIBRARY OCT 0014093 42210 635.00 $3,04506._11/21/2013 39.29 11/21/2013 11121/2013 1 106000 ASHOK K DHINGRA PLNG COMM -OCT 2013 0015210 1 44100 1 130.00 $130.00 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 106001 EMERALD LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC ADDLMAINT-CITY HALL 0014093 42210 59.00 ',$9829 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 EMERALD LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC ADDLMAINT-CITY HALL 0014093 42210 39.29 "', 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 1 106002 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT UMEMPLOYMENTCHRGS-3RD QT 1 0014060 1 40093 1 99.001 $99.00111/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 106003 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT SCIENCES ADMIN FEES -FPL 2013-229 001 23010 1,141.24 $6,340.20 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT SCIENCES ADMIN FEES -FPL 2013-229 001 34650 -1,141,24 "', 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 106007 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT SCIENCES PROESVCS-FPL 2013-229 001 23010 6,340.20 '.. 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/2112013 1 106604 EXCELLANDSCAPE ADDLMAINT-DIST 38 1385538 1 42210 1 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 106005 EXPRESS MAIL CORPORATE ACCOUNT EXPRESS MAIL -FPL 2012485 001 23010 36.22 $124.24 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 EXPRESS MAIL CORPORATE ACCOUNT EXPRESS MAIL -FPL 2011-433 001 23010 36.22'', "', 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 106007 EXPRESS MAIL CORPORATE ACCOUNT EXPRESS MAIL -FPL 2012-479 001 23010 36.22 '', 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11 /2112 01 3 EXPRESS MAIL CORPORATE ACCOUNT EXPRESS MAIL -GENERAL 0014090 42120 15.58 ''. 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 1 1 106008 GO PLNG COMM -OCT 2013 0015210 1 44100 1 130.00 $1W00111/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 GERONIMO CONCRETE INC RETETIONS PAYABLE 250 20300 -350.00 "', 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 106007 FEDEX EXPRESS MAIL -FPL 2010414 001 23010 1 40.26 $40.28111/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 1 106008 GERONIMO CONCRETE INC RETENTIONS PAYABLE 250 20300 -1985.00 $441365.00 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 GERONIMO CONCRETE INC RETETIONS PAYABLE 250 20300 -350.00 "', 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 GRAFFITI SVCS -OCT 13 GERONIMO CONCRETE INC ADA IMPROVE -DOG PARK 2505310 46415 7,000.00 '', 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 GERONIMO CONCRETE INC ADA IMPROVE -DOG PARK 2505310 46415 39,700.00 ''. 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 1 106009 GOGREEN MOBILE SHREDDING INC SHREDDING -2013 ECO EXPO 1155515 1 44000 1 640.00 $640.00 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 1 106010 GRAFFITI CONTROL SYSTEMS GRAFFITI SVCS -OCT 13 0015230 1 45520 1 4,940.00 $4y940-00 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 1 106011 CYNTHIAHUA RECREATION REFUND 001 34780 1 54.00 "',$54.00 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 1 106012 HUMANE SOCIETY OF POMONAVALLEY INC ANIMAL CONTROL SVCS -DEC 0014431 1 45403 9,972?5 $9'„972.25 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 1 106013 IHUNTERHUMPHREY IRECREATION REFUND 1 001 1 34740 1 40.00 !$40.00111/21/2013 11/21/2013 Page 6 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 11/14/2013 thru 11/27/2013 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct p Amount I Total Check Amount Check Date Check Date 11/21/2013 106014 CHARLES INGOGLIA CRMNLAPPREHENSION REWARD 1 0014411 1 42361 1 500.00 $500.00 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 1 11/21/2013 1 106015 IKENNETH L DESFORGES IREIMB4TFORUM 1 0014070 1 42335' 107.921 $107.92111/21/2013 $10546 111/21/2013 1 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 OFFICEMAX INC CREDITMEMO-GENERAL0014090 41200 -36.29 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 1 106016 KEYSTONE UNIFORM DEPOT MTG-V/PATROL 0014415 1 42325 1 128.40 $128.40 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 OFFICEMAX INC SUPPLIES -COMM SVCS 0015350 41200 18.35 '',. 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 106017 GABRIELAKLEIN CONTRACT CLASS -FALL 0015350 45320 720.00 $720.00 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 Page 7 11/21/2013 106018 LEONARD LAMB CRMNLAPPREHENSIONREWARD 0014411 42361 1 500.00 $500.00111/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 106019 LANCE,SOLL&LUNGHARDLLP PROF.SVCS-2013 GOV AUDIT 0014050 44010 1 11,243.00 $11,243.00 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 1 106020 CHRISTINE LANG FACILITY REFUND-PANTERA 001 23002 100.00 $100.00 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 711/21/2013T 106021 LEIGHTON&ASSOCIATES, INC. GEOTECH SVCS -DOG PARK 2505310 1 46415 3,473.00 $3;473.00 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 1 11/21/2013 1 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 106022 LEWIS ENGRAVING INC. LEWIS ENGRAVING INC. CITYTILE-GENERAL0014090 NAMEBADGES-GENERAL0014090 1 44100 1 42113 42113 75.76 29.70 $10546 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 1 11/21/2013 1 106023 1JIMMY LIN 1PLNG COMM -OCT 2013 1 0015210 1 44100 1 130.001 $130.00111/21/2013 11/21/2013 111/21/2013 1 11/21/2013 OFFICEMAX INC CREDITMEMO-GENERAL0014090 41200 -36.29 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 1 106024 TONILINDER FACILITY REFUND -HERITAGE 001 23002 1 200.00 $200.00 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 OFFICEMAX INC SUPPLIES -COMM SVCS 0015350 41200 18.35 '',. 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 1 106025 LOOMIS COURIER SVCS -OCT 13 0014090 1 44000 1 834.88 $834,88111/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 Page 7 11/21/2013 1 106026 DIANNE MARTINEZ CONTRACT CLASS -FALL 0015350 1 45320 1 324.00 $324.00 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 i _1/_2v/2o_i TT 106027 IOAK TREE LANES INC ICONTRACT CLASS -FALL 0015350 1 45320 1 27,001 $27.00111/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 106028 OFFICEMAX INC SUPPLIES-CMGR 0014030 41200 18.35 $159.23 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 OFFICEMAX INC CREDITMEMO-GENERAL0014090 41200 -36.29 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 RECREATION REFUND OFFICEMAX INC SUPPLIES -DBC 0015333 41200 56.94 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 OFFICEMAX INC SUPPLIES -COMM SVCS 0015350 41200 18.35 '',. 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 23002 OFFICEMAX INC SUPPLIES-P/WORKS 0015510 41200 101.88 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 106029 'PACIFIC TELEMANAGEMENT SERVICES (PARK PAY PHONES -DEC 2013 1 0015340 1 42125 1 495.841 $495.84111/21/2013 111/21/2013 1 11/21/2013 106030 JAYANTIPATEL RECREATION REFUND 001 34720 30.00 ',$30.00 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 1 106031 ALEJANDRA PEREZ FACILITY REFUND -HERITAGE 001 23002 50.00 'x.$50.00 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 Page 7 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 11/14/2013 thru 11/27/2013 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct # Amount I Total Check Amount Cheek Date Check Date 11/2 V2013 106032 PERS HEALTH DEC 2013-HELATH INS PREM 001 21105 38,291.83 $391121.08 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 PERS HEALTH DEC 2013-RETIREEHEALTHP 0014090 40086 fi90.00 , 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 PERS HEALTH DEC 2013 -HEALTH ADMIN FEE 0014060 40093 139.25 '.. 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 106033 PERS RETIREMENT SURVIVOR BENEFIT 001 21109 800 $216.88 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 PERS RETIREMENT RETIRE CONTRIB-EE 001 21109 208.88 42126 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11121/2013 106034 PERS RETIREMENT FUND SURVIVOR BENEFIT 001 21109 45.57 $131337.48 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 PERS RETIREMENT FUND RETIRE CONTRIB-EE 001 21109 13,034.35 42126 11/21/2013 11/21/201 1112 1 /2 01 3 11/21/2013 RERS RETIREMENTFUND RETIRE CONTRI6-(RERRA) 001 21109 257.56 ''. 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 1 106035 IPTM DOCUMENT SYSTEMS IPRINT SVCS -2013 TAX FORMS 1 0014050 1 42110 1 47,081 '',$47.08111/21/2013 111/21/2013 1 11/21/2013 1 106036 IRKA CONSULTING GROUP IBLDG&SFTY SVCS -OCT 13 1 0015220 1 45201 32,34995 $32349.95 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 106037 SCPMAHR SCPMAHR MEMBERSHIP DUES-TONTHAT MEMBERSHIP DUES-TONTHAT - 0014060 0014060 42315 42315 50.00 -50.00 '', $OAO 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 1 106038 (JAGDISHSHAH I PLNG COMM -OCT 2013 1 0015210 1 44100 1 130.001 $130.00111/21/2013 111/21/2013 1 106041 11/21/2013 106039 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECTSVCS-C/HALL 0014093 42126 9,554.72 $26'',316.80 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 WATER SUPPLIES-C/HALL EO RENTAL-C/HALL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS -DBC 0015333 42126 10,720.81 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECTSVCS-DBC 0015333 42126 5,621.17 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS -PARKS 0015340 42126 28.86 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 PENTAMATION SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS -DIST 41 1415541 42126 51.52 '... 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS -DIST 38 1385538 42126 339.72 ''. 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 106041 STANDARD INSURANCE OF STANDARD INSURANCE OF STANDARD INSURANCE OF OREGON OREGON OREGON DEC13-STD/LTD DEC 13-SUPP LIFE INS PREM DEC 13 -LIFE INS PREMS 001 001 001 21112 2110fi 21106 2,196.96 189.00 i,001.51 $3'.,38247 '', 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 106040 SPARKLETTS SPARKLETTS WATER SUPPLIES-C/HALL EO RENTAL-C/HALL 0014090 0014090 41200 42130 244.06 10.75 $254.81 "'. 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 106042 STUBBIES PROMOTIONS EXCURSION -ROSE PARADE 0015350 1 45310 1 575.57 $575.57 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 106041 STANDARD INSURANCE OF STANDARD INSURANCE OF STANDARD INSURANCE OF OREGON OREGON OREGON DEC13-STD/LTD DEC 13-SUPP LIFE INS PREM DEC 13 -LIFE INS PREMS 001 001 001 21112 2110fi 21106 2,196.96 189.00 i,001.51 $3'.,38247 '', 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 106042 STUBBIES PROMOTIONS EXCURSION -ROSE PARADE 0015350 1 45310 1 575.57 $575.57 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 1 106043 ISUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR PENTAMATION ICOMPMAINT-I.T. 1 0014070 1 42205 1 14,442.501 $22„798.90 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 Page 8 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 11/14/2013 thru 11/27/2013 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct # Amount I Total Check Amount Check Date Check Date 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 106043... SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR PENTANIATION SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR PENTAMATION COMP MAINT-17. COMP MAINT-LT. 0014070 0014070 42205 42205 6,724.00 1,63240 $22,798.90._11/21/2013 ''. 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 I 106044 IVIVIENNE TEERLING RECREATION REFUND 001 34780 64.001 $64,00111/21/2013 111/21/2013 11/21/2013 1 106045 TELEPACIFIC COMMUNICATIONS T-1 INTERNET SVCS-NOV 13 0014070 1 44030 1 850.71 $850.71 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 106046 THE GAS COMPANY GAS SVCS -DBC 0015333 42126 77597 $1760.24 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 THE GAS COMPANY GAS SVCS -HERITAGE 0015340 42126 109.75 ',, 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 106048 THE GAS COMPANY GAS SVCS -CITY HALL 0014093 42126 874.52 ''. 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 106047 ITHE SAUCE CREATIVE SERVICES PRINT SVCS -COMM SVCS 0015350 1 42110 575.101 $575.10111/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 111/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 VANTAGEPOINTTRNSFRAGNTS-303248 11/22/13-P/R DEDUCTIONS 001 21108 s�6z6a "'.. 11/21/2013 1 106048 LAUREN THEIN FACILITY REFUND-SYCCYN001 106055 23002 50.00 ',$50.00 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 $1'',,320.92 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 VERIZON CALIFORNIA PH.SVCS-PARKS 0014090 42125 747,07 11/21/2013 1 106049 TIME WARNER CABLE INTERNET SVCS-C/HALL 0014070 1 44030 950,001 $950.00 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 VERIZON CALIFORNIA PH.SVCS-HERITAGE 0015340 42125 98.36 FII/21/2013T 106050 TREMCO REPAIRSVCS-HERITAGE 0015340 1 42210 1 2370.00 $2370.00 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 VERIZON CALIFORNIA PH.SVCS-HERITAGE PK 0015340 42125 59.80 11/21/2013 1 106051 ITRIFYTTSPORTS ICONTRACT CLASS -FALL 0015350 1 45320 1 2,509.20 $2'',509.20 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 106052 VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE MAINT INC VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE MAINT INC VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE MAINT INC LANDSCAPENIAINT-DBC LANDSCAPE MAINT-PARKS ADDL MAINT-PETERSON 0015333 0015340 0015340 45300 45300 42210 5,645.47 2ssoa.11 405.36 $31;554.96 '... 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 I 11/21/2013 106053 IVALLEYTROPHY ITROPHIES -ADULT BSKBLL 1 0015350 I 41200 1 156.961 $15696111/21/2013 111/21/2013 1 11/21/2013 106054 VANTAGEPOINTTRNSFRAGNTS-303248 11/22/13 -LOAN DEDUCTIONS 001 21108 2,25668 $8.,958.72 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 VANTAGEPOINTTRNSFRAGNTS-303248 11/22/13-P/R DEDUCTIONS 001 21108 s�6z6a "'.. 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 106055 VERIZON CALIFORNIA PH.SVCS-SRSTCH1 0014090 42125 184.22 $1'',,320.92 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 VERIZON CALIFORNIA PH.SVCS-PARKS 0014090 42125 747,07 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 VERIZON CALIFORNIA PH.SVCS-CITY HALL 0014093 42125 14037 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 VERIZON CALIFORNIA PH.SVCS-HERITAGE 0015340 42125 98.36 '... 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 VERIZON CALIFORNIA PH. SVCS-CMGR 0014030 42125 91.08 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 VERIZON CALIFORNIA PH.SVCS-HERITAGE PK 0015340 42125 59.80 '.. 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 Page 9 11/21/2013 i 1/21/2013 106056 WAXIESANITARYSUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY SUPPLIES-CITYHALL SUPPLIES -DBC 0014093 0015333 41200 41200 278.91 1,141.75 $2y147.87 ''. 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 Page 9 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 11/14/2013 thru 11/27/20 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct # Amount Total CheckAmount Check Date Check Date 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 106056... WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY SUPPLIES -CITY HALL SUPPLIES -DBC 0014093 0015333 41200 41200 299.32 427.89 $2,147.87...11/21/2013 .. 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 106057 WESTCOASTARBORISTSINC TREEMAINT-OCT2013 0015558 45509 8,618.35 $33,460.78 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 JAMrRITECH BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC TREE MAINT-OCT 2013 0015558 45509 23,094.93 '',. 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11121 /2 01 3 106061 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC WATERING SVCS -OCT 2013 0015558 45510 1,048.50 '', 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 001 WEST COASTARBORISTS INC WATERING SVCS -OCT 2013 0015558 45510 699.00 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 1 106058 WHITE NELSON DIEHL EVANS LLP TAX SEMINAR -HONEYWELL 0014050 1 42340 295.00 $295.00 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 106059 WOODRUFF SPRADLING & SMART LEGAL SVCS -GENERAL 0014020 44020 1,365.00 $15384.49 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 JAMrRITECH BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC WOODRUFF SPRADLING & SMART LEGAL SVCS -COUNCIL 0014020 44020 702.00 '', 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 106061 WOODRUFF SPRADLING & SMART LEGAL SCVS-CMGR 0014020 44020 916.50 $130.00 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 001 WOODRUFF SPIRALLING &SMART LEGAL SVCS -COMM DEV 0014020 44020 3,997.50 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 106062 WOODRUFF SPRADLING & SMART LEGAL SVCS -COMM SVCS 0014020 44020 604.50 $3"',400.00 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 170.00 WOODRUFF SPRADLING & SMART LEGALSVCS-H/R 0014020 44020 214.50 '.. 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 106063 WOODRUFF SPRADLING & SMART LEGAL SVCS -INFO SYS 0014020 44020 604.50 "',, 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 WOODRUFF SPRADLING & SMART LEGALSVCS-P/WORKS 0014020 44020 6,979.991 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 106060 JAMESYEU FACILITY REFUND -DBC 001 23002 500.00 $500.00 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/26/2013 JAMrRITECH BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES CROSSINGGUARD-OCT/NOV 0014411 45410 6,849.30 ''.. 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/21/2013 1 106061 YITONY TORNG FILING COMM -OCT 2013 0015210 1 44100 1 130.00 $130.00 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 FACILITY REFUND -DBC 001 23002 1 100.00 $100.00 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/21/2013 1 106062 ZAINO TENNIS COURTS INC MAINT-PARKS 0015340 1 42210 1 3,400.00 $3"',400.00 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 1 34730 1 170.00 $170.00 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 1 106063 ACCESS CONTROL SECURITY SECURITY GUARD -OCT 13 0015333 1 45010 1 763.20 $763.20 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 1 106064 ALBERTSONS LLC SUPPLIES-REC 0015350 42353 1,156.25 $1,156.25 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 1 106065 ALEXANDER & LYNN INC CONTRACT CLASS -FALL 0015350 1 45320 189.00 $189.00 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 106066 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES CROSSING GUARD -OCT 13 0014411 45410 6,849.30 $13',698.60 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 JAMrRITECH BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES CROSSINGGUARD-OCT/NOV 0014411 45410 6,849.30 ''.. 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 Page 10 11/26/2013 106067 JAMrRITECH BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC COPIER MAINT-OCT 13 0014090 1 42100 1 1,080.14 $1,080.14 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 106068 CLAIREARTHUR FACILITY REFUND -DBC 001 23002 1 100.00 $100.00 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 1 106069 IJEAN BERMAN RECREATION REFUND 1 001 1 34730 1 170.00 $170.00 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 Page 10 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 11/14/2013 thru 11/27/2013 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct # Amount Total Check Amount Check Date Check Date 11/26/2013 106070 RICK BETACOURT PROF.SVCS-DB MINUTE 0014095 44000 340.00 $1,545.00 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 CHINO HILLS FORD RI CKBETACOURT VIDEO -VET RECOG 0014095 44000 605.00 '.... 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 RICK BETACOURT VIDEOTAPING-CNCLMTG 0014095 44000 600.00 ', 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 1 106071 BRUCEBULLER FACILITYREFUND-HERITAGE OOt 23002 200.00 $200.00 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 106072 CDW GOVERNMENT COMP EQ -1.1 0014070 41200 77.40 $4690.86 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 CHINO HILLS FORD CDW GOVERNMENT LAPTOP CASES -1 T. 5304070 46230 3,012.04 ',. 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 CDW GOVERNMENT COMP EQAT. 0014070 41200 59.95 ', 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 0015333 CDW GOVERNMENT COMP EQ-I.T. 5304070 46230 778.00 ',, 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 CDW GOVERNMENT COMP EQ-I.T. 0015333 46410 172.22 ''',. 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 1V26/2013 1,402.92 CDW GOVERNMENT COMP E -ILT 0015333 46410 591.25 ''. 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 106082 HARDY &HARPER INC RETENTIONS PAYABLE 250 20300 -321.00 $33,624.00 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 106073 CHINO HILLS FORD VEH MAINT-COMM SVCS 0014090 42200 1,067 80 $1;067.80 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 HARDY & HARPER INC RETENTIONS PAYABLE 250 20300 -400.00 11 /2fi/2013 106074 CONSTRUCTION HARDWARE CO HARDWARE -DBC 0015333 46410 65.40 $65A0111/2612013 11/26/2013 9,000.00 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 HARDY&HARPER INC SLURRY SEAL -ZONE 7 2505510 11/26/2013 1 106075 CTS HOME APPLICANCE CENTER REFRIGERATOR -DBC 0015333 46410 1,402.92 $1402.92 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 2505510 46411 6,420.00 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 HARDY&HARPER INC 11/26/2013 106076 JAMES DESTEFANO REIMB-MTG 0014030 1 42325 1 65.00 '',$65.00 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 106077 CAROLADENNIS PROFSVCS-CNCLMTG 0014030 1 44000 1 300.00 $300.00 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 ii/2fi/2013 106078 DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT-SEPT 0015554 1 45507 1 2457.26 $21457.26 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 1 106079 DIAMOND BAR COMMUNITY FOUNDATION AD-NOV/DEC 2013 0014095 1 42115 1 600.00 $600.00 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 1 106080 DISCOUNT ROOTER CO MAINT-LIBRARY 0014093 1 42210 1 90.a0 ..$90.06 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 106081 TINAHAGEN FACILITY REFUND -DBC 001 23002 1 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 106082 HARDY &HARPER INC RETENTIONS PAYABLE 250 20300 -321.00 $33,624.00 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 HARDY &HARPER INC RETENTIONS PAYABLE 250 20300 -575.00 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 HARDY & HARPER INC RETENTIONS PAYABLE 250 20300 -400.00 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 HARDY & HARPER INC ROAD PAVEMENT MAINT-DBB 0015554 45502 9,000.00 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 HARDY&HARPER INC SLURRY SEAL -ZONE 7 2505510 46411 8,000.00 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 HARDY &HARPER INC SLURRYSEAL-AREAIB 2505510 46411 6,420.00 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 HARDY&HARPER INC SLURRY SEAL -AREA 18 2505510 1 46411 11,500.00 . 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 Page 11 Check Date City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 11/14/2013 thru 11/27/20 Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept I Acct# I Amount Date I Check Date 11/26/2013 I 106083 IINLANDEMPIRE STAGES ISR EXCURSION-INDIO CASINO 1 1125350 1 45310 1 1,095.001 $1095.00111/26/2013 111/26/2013 11/26/2013 106084 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN LEGAL AD-P/HEARING 0014090 42115 402.32 $3842.26 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 LOS ANGELES COUNTY ASSESSOR INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN LEGALAD-FPL 2013-366 001 23010 433.12 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 FACILITY REFUND-PANTERA INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN LEGALAD-FPL 2013-147 001 23010 451.60 '.. 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 0015340 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN LEGALAD-FPL 2011-433 001 23010 49164 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 INLAN D VALLEY DAI LY BULLETIN LEGAL AD -FPL 2012-479 001 23010 463.92 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN LEGAL AD -FPL 2013-229 001 23010 614.84 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN LEGAL AD-FPL2013-77001 23010 48548 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN LEGAL AD -FPL 2013-215 001 23010 499.34 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 1 106085 INTERIOR SERVICES SUPPLIES -DBC 0015333 1 42210 1 400.00 $400.00 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 106086 JUSTTIRES VEH MAINT-COMM SVC 0014090 42200 25.67 $208.49 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 LOS ANGELES COUNTY ASSESSOR JUSTTIRES VEH MAINT-COMM SVCS 0014090 42200 25.21 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 FACILITY REFUND-PANTERA JUSTTIRES VEH MAINT-COMM SVCS 0014090 42200 157.61 '.. 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 106087 HOLLIE KEETON FACILITY REFUND -DBC 001 23002 1 900.00 $900.00 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 106088 KOACORPORATION TRFFC ENG SVCS -CASTLE RCK 0015551 45222 1,250.00 $4,774.90 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11 /2fi/2013 LOS ANGELES COUNTY ASSESSOR KOACORPORATION PROF.SVCS-SIGNAL MSTR PLN 2505510 46412 2792.50 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 FACILITY REFUND-PANTERA KOACORPORATION TRFFC ENG SVCS-SEPT-NOV 1135510 44000 732.40 '.. 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 106089 L M T ENTERPRISES INC CONCRETE REPAIR -DBC 0015333 46410 1 3,220.00 $3,220.00111/26/2013 1111261TO13 11/26/2013 1 106090 LOS ANGELES COUNTY ASSESSOR DVD COPY-P/WORKS 0014070 42205 1 8.72 $8.72 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 106091 LAE ASSOCIATES INC ENG SVCS -AUG -SEPT 13 0015551 45221 87060 $3!747.50 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 LAE ASSOCIATES INC ENGSVCS-AUG-SEPT 13 0015551 45221 272.50 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 FACILITY REFUND-PANTERA LAE ASSOCIATES INC ENGSVCS-OCT 2013 0015551 45221 2,605.00 '.. 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 106092 LEWIS ENGRAVING INC. ENGRAVING SVCS -COUNCIL 0014090 1 42113 1 277.90 $277.90111/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 1 106093 JUDYLIGON FACILITY REFUND-PANTERA 001 23002 1 50.00 ($50.00 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 1 106094 ILOS ANGELES COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS ISUMP PUMP MAINT-OCT 13 0015340 1 42210 1 187.561 $187.56 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 1 11/26/2013 1 106095 ILOSANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. ITRANSIT SALES -SEPT 13 1 1125553 1 45402 1 140.131 $426.,110.36111/26/2013 111/26/2013 1 Page 12 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 11/14/2013 thru 11/27/203 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct 11 Amount Total Check Amount Check Date Check Date 11/26/2013 106095._ LOSANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT CONTRACT SVCS -SEPT 13 0014411 45401 416,858.59 $426,110.36...11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 CONTRACT CLASS -FALL LOSANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT CALVARY CHAPEL -SEPT 13 0014411 45402 8,593.71 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 LOSANGELESCOUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT ST SWEEPER -SEPT 2013 0014411 45402 517.93 '.. 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 106096 LOWE'S BUSINESS ACCOUNT SUPPLIES -DBC 0015333 41200 64.49 5722.77 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 LOWE'S BUSINESSACCOUNT SUPPLIES-HOUNTED HOUSE 0015350 45305 658.28 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 1 106097 MARTIN & CHAPMAN DO SUPPLIES -ELECTION 0014030 1 42390 1 16.72 $16,72111/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 106098 MCE CORPORATION ROAD MAINT SVCS -OCT 13 0015554 45502 340.66 $14;777.25 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 MCE CORPORATION RIGHT OF WAY MAINT-OCT 13 0015554 45522 1,654,90 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 CONTRACT CLASS -FALL MCE CORPORATION STORM DRAIN MAINT-OCT 13 0015554 45512 828.52 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 MCE CORPORATION VEGETATION CONTROL -OCT 13 0015558 45506 11,953.17 '.. 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 1 106099 MARLENE RAMIREZ MOONEY CONTRACT CLASS -FALL 0015350 1 45320 1 462.00 $462.00 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 106100 ONWARD ENGINEERING ROAD MAINT-OCT 2013 2505510 46411 1,046.25 $5,155.25 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 ONWARD ENGINEERING ROAD MAINT-OCT 2013 2505510 46411 627.75 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 CONTRACT CLASS -FALL ONWARD ENGINEERING ROAD MAINT-OCT 2013 2505510 46411 2,511.00 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/28/2013 ONWARD ENGINEERING ROAD MAINT-AREA 2 2505510 46411 679.18 '.. 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 1 42315 ONWARD ENGINEERING ROAD MAINT-ZONE1 2505510 46411 291.07 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 1 106101 IVANIAPEREZ FACILITY REFUND -HERITAGE 001 36625 1 25.00 $26X0111/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 106102 ROBERTPEREZ FACILITY REFUND -DBC 001 23002 200.00 $590.00 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 ROBERT PEREZ FACILITY REFUND -DBC 001 23002 390.00 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 106103 R F DICKSON COMPANY INC STREET SWEEPING SVCS -SEPT 0015554 45501 8,384.06 $16,768.12 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 R F DICKSON COMPANY INC STREET SWEEPING SVCS -OCT 0015554 45501 8,384.06 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 1 11/26/2013 1 106104 IROSIE RUIZ FACILITY REFUND -HERITAGE 1 001 1 23002 1 200.001 $200.00111/26/2013 111/26/2013 1 1 11/26/2013 1 106105 IDEVI SAHARAINI FACILITY REFUND-PANTERA 1 001 1 23002 1 10mol $1oo.00l11/26/2013 111/26/2013 1 11/26/2013 1 106106 KYLE SANTIAGO FACILITY REFUND -HERITAGE 001 23002 1 200.00 S200.00111/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 1 106107 SARITASCHUBEL CONTRACT CLASS -FALL 0015350 1 45320 1 198.60 $198.60111/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 106108 SCPMAHR MEMBERSHIP DUES-TONTHAT 0014060 1 42315 50.00 $50.00 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 Page 13 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 11/14/2013 thru 11/27/2013 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct # Amount Total CheckAmount Check Date Check Date 11/26/2013 106109 SIEMENS TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT-P/WK 0015554 45507 1,100.00 $14,138.74 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 MANUEL SOLLESTRE SIEMENS TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT-OCT 0015554 45507 4,102.09 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 CONTRACT CLASS -FALL SIEMENS TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT-OCT 0015554 45507 8,936.74 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 106110 SIMPSON ADVERTISING INC PROF.SVCS-RECGUIDE WNTR 0014095 1 44000 1 4,795.00 $4,795.00 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 1 106111 MANUEL SOLLESTRE FACILITY REFUND -DBC 001 23002 1 500.00 $500.00 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 CONTRACT CLASS -FALL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS-TRFFC CONTROL 0015510 42126 20243 11/26/2013 106112 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS -DIST 38 1385538 42126 26.15 51,403.37 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 THE STANLEY LOUIS COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS-TRFFC CONTROL 0015510 42126 324.56 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 CONTRACT CLASS -FALL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS-TRFFC CONTROL 0015510 42126 20243 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 0014070 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS-TRFFC CONTROL 0015510 42126 245.93 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS-TRFFC CONTROL 0015510 42126 599.30 WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 1 106113 STREET TREE SEMINAR INC MEMBERSHIP DUES -ROSE 0015310 1 42315 1 30.00 $30.00 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 THE STANLEY LOUIS COMPANY THE SAN GABRIEL VALLEY NEWSPAPER GR LEGALAD-FPL2013-366 001 23010 477.20 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 1 106114 TENNIS ANYONE INC CONTRACT CLASS -FALL 0015350 1 45320 1 4,229.40 $4,229,40111126/2013 111/26/2013 11/26/2013 106115 THECOMDYNGROUPINC CONSULTANITSVCS-WK 11/15 0014070 1 44000 1,895.88 $1,895.88 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 106116 THE SAN GABRIEL VALLEY NEWSPAPER GR LEGALAD-P/HEARING 0014030 42115 350.24 $3,599.56 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 THE STANLEY LOUIS COMPANY THE SAN GABRIEL VALLEY NEWSPAPER GR LEGALAD-FPL2013-366 001 23010 477.20 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 THE SAN GABRIEL VALLEY NEWSPAPER GR LEGAL AD -FPL 2013-147 001 23010 482.72 11/26/2013 1 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 0014070 THE SAN GABRIEL VALLEY NEWSPAPER GR LEGALAD-FPL 2012-479 001 23010 436-28 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 THE SAN GABRIEL VALLEY NEWSPAPER GR LEGALAD-FPL 2011-433 001 23010 455.12 WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 90.00 THE SAN GABRIELVALLEY NEWSPAPER GR LEGALAD-FPL2013-77 001 23010 422.00 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 THE SAN GABRIELVALLEY NEWSPAPER GR LEGALAD-FPL 2013-215 001 23010 433.04 0014030 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 THE SAN GABRIELVALLEY NEWSPAPER GR LEGALAD-FPL 2013-229 001 23010 548.96 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 Page 14 11/26/2013 1 106117 THE STANLEY LOUIS COMPANY MAINT-CITY HALL NOV 12 0014093 1 42210 1 203.40 $203A0]11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 1 106118 VISION INTERNET PROVIDERS INC MONTHLY HOSTING-NOV 13 0014070 1 44030 1 180.00 $180.00 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 1 106119 WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT APP TRANSFER DIST 38 1385538 1 42126 1 90.00 $90.00 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 106120 WALNUT/DIAMOND BAR SHERIFF'S MEMBERSHIP DUES -2014 0014030 1 42315 1 50.00 $50.00111/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 106121 WEST COAST CABLE INC INSTALL SVCS-I.T. 0015333 1 46410 1 1,340.00 $1,340.00 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 Page 14 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 11/14/2013 thru 11/27/2013 11/21/2013 13 -PP 24 PAYROLL TRANSFER P/RTRANSFER-13/PP24 001 10200 168,796.59 $185;480.33 11/21/2013 Check Date Check Number Vender Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct # Amount Total Check Amount Check Date Check Date 11/26/2013 106122 WEST COAST MEDIA AD -CRAFT FAIR DEC 13 0014095 42115 500.00 $500.00 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 PAYROLLTRANSFER FIR TRANSFER-13/PP 24 115 10200 11/26/2013 1 106123 WENDY WU RECREATION REFUND 001 34740 1 74.00 $74.00 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 10200 390.50 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11126/2013 1 106124 WILLIAM YUEN FACILFFY REFUND -DBC 001 23002 1 100.00 $100.00 11/26/2013 11/26/2013 11/21/2013 13 -PP 24 PAYROLL TRANSFER P/RTRANSFER-13/PP24 001 10200 168,796.59 $185;480.33 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 PAYROLLTRANSFER P/RTRANSFER-13/PP24 112 10200 3,354.13 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 PAYROLLTRANSFER P/R TRANSFER-13/PP 24 113 10200 4664.97 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 PAYROLLTRANSFER FIR TRANSFER-13/PP 24 115 10200 8,274.14 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 PAYROLLTRANSFER P/R TRANSFER -1 3/PP 24 125 10200 390.50 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 1 DEC12013 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA, NA DEBT SVCS PYMNT-DEC 13 3704090 1 47100 1 244,449.93 $244,449.93111/21/2013 11/21/2013 $1,673,684.76 Page 15 CITY COUNCIL Agenda # Meeting Date: W Dec 3, 2013 AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council VIA: James DeStefano, City Ma a TITLE: Treasurer's Statement of October 013 and Revised Treasurer's Statements of June, July, August and September 2013 RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Treasurer's Statement of October 2013 and the revised Treasurer's Statements of June, July, August and September 2013 FINANCIAL IMPACT: No Fiscal Impact BACKGROUND: Per City policy, the Finance Department presents the monthly Treasurer's Statement for the City Council's review and approval. The October statement shows the cash balances with a breakdown of bank account balances, investment account balances, and the effective yield earned from investments. Also included is a separate investment portfolio report which details the activities of the City's investments. All investments have been made in accordance with the City's Investment Policy. Since the City's audit firm, Lance, Soil & Lunghard, L.L.P., has completed the audit for FY 12-13 and the year end numbers have been finalized, revised treasurer's statements for the months of June, July, August and September are also presented to the City Council for approval. There were no changes to the overall cash balances, just changes between the fund amounts. PREPARED BY: Susan Full, Senior Accountant REVIEWED BY: E�4 Department Head As istant City Manager Attachments: Treasurer's Statement, Investment Portfolio Report CITY OF DIAMOND BAR - CITY TREASURER'S REPORT CASH BALANCE AS OF October 31, 2013 BEGINNING CASH BALANCE $23,000,773.99 CASH RECEIVED Cash Receipts $1,496,969.95 Total Cash Received $1,496,969.95 $24,497,743.94 EXPENDITURES Checks Written ($2,470,952.28) Payroll Transfers (355,376.71) Wire Transfers 0.00 Returned Checks 0.00 Charge Card Fees & Other Adjustments (3,747.75) Total Expenditures ($2,830,076.74) CASH BALANCE AS OF: October 31, 2013 $21,667,667.20 TOTAL CASH BREAKDOWN Active Funds General Account ($363,880.20) Payroll Account $50,000.90 Change Fund $1,000.00 Petty Cash Account $500.00 Cash With Fiscal Agent $3.20 Unamortized Discount on Investments $4,173.69 Total Active Funds ($308,202.41) Investment Funds: Local Agency Investment Fund $4,051,412.92 Corporate Floating Rate Notes $749,584.75 Federal Agency Callable $10,051,693.99 Bank Negotiable CDs $6,446,547.57 Wells Fargo Advantage Money Market Fund $676,630.38 Total Investment Funds $21,975,869.61 CASH BALANCE AS OF: October 31, 2013 $21,667,667.20 Average Yield to Maturity 0.828% FY2013-14 Year -To -Date Interest Earnings $61,353.37 FY2013-14 Budgeted Annual Interest Earnings $180,950.00 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY REPORT for the Month of October 31. 2013 PERCENT OF DAYS TO INVESTMENTS BOOK VALUE PORTFOLIO TERM MATURITY YIELD TO MATURITY - Local Agency Investment Fund - $4,051,412.92 - - - 18.44% - - -1 - - - - 1 - - - 0244 - Federal Agency Issues - Callable $10,051,693.99 45.74% 1,566 570 0.895 Negotiable CD's - Banks $6,446,547.57 29.33% 1,433 993 1.215 Wells Fargo Sweep Account $676,630.38 3.08% 1 1 0.010 Corporate Floating Rate Notes $749,584.75 3.41% 931 726 0.501 Total Investments and Averages $21,975,869.61 100.00% 1169 546 0.828 TOTALS TOTAL INTEREST EARNED 11/19/2013 Date $21,975,869.61 100.00% N/A N/A N/A MONTH ENDING October 31, 2013 $15,287.56 FISCAL YEAR-TO-DATE 2013-14 $61,353.37 I certify that this report accurately reflects all City pooled investments and is in conformity with the investment policy of the City of Diamond Bar approved by City Council and on file in the City Clerk's office. The investment program herein provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures. Page 1 City of Diamond Bar Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary October 31, 2013 City of Diamond Bar 21810 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA (909)839-7053 Par Market Book %of Days to YTM/C Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity Local Agency Investment Funds 4,051,412.92 4,053,711.37 4,051,412.92 18.44 1 1 0.244 Federal Agency Callable 10,055,000.00 9,974,888.24 10,051,693.99 45.74 1,566 :570 0.895 Negotiable CD 6,447,000.00 6453,448.81 6,446,547.57 29.33 1,433 993 1.215 Wells Fargo Sweep Account 676,630.38 676,630.38 676,630.38 3.08 1 1 0.010 Floating Rate Notes 750,00000 748,632.00 749,584.75 341 931 726 0.501 21,980,043.30 21,907,310.80 21,975,869.61 100.00% 1,169 577 0.828 Investments Total Earnings October 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 15,396.46 61,353.37 Average Daily Balance - 22,616,298.67 24,012,396.79 Effective Rate of Return 0.80% 0.76% L� Dianna Honeywell, Finance Director ®"' Reporting period 10/01/2013-10/3112013 Portfolio POOL AP Run Date: 1111912013-1007 PM (PRF PMI) 7.3.0 Report Ven 7.3.3b City of Diamond Bar Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments October 31, 2013 Average Purchase CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Page 1 Stated Days to YTM/C Maturity Book Value Rate Term Maturity Date Local Agency Investment Funds LAIF 10028 Local Agency Investment Fund 4,051,412.92 4,053,71137 4,051,412.92 0244 Subtotal and Average 4,549,194.38 4,051,412.92 4,053,711.37 4,051,412.92 Federal Agency Callable 3133EA5V6 10041 Federal Farm Credit Bank 10/26/2012 500,000.00 499,640.50 499,813.46 0.620 3133EC7A6 10043 Federal Farm Credit Bank 12/12/2012 1,000,000.00 984,394.00 999,177.22 0.820 3133EC7134 10044 Federal Farm Credit Bank 12/13/2012 500,000.00 492,513.50 499,79417 0.840 3133ECJL9 10049 Federal Farm Credit Bank 04/02/2013 500,000.00 499,462.50 500,000.00 0.600 3133ECMZ4 10051 Federal Farm Credit Bank 05/01/2013 500,000.00 494,619.00 500,000.00 0.690 3133ECNY6 10056 Federal Farm Credit Bank 05/08/2013 500,000.00 489,361.50 499,774.03 0.950 3133ECP40 10060 Federal Farm Credit Bank 05/09/2013 500,000.00 493,904.50 499,339.58 0,640 313382HD8 10047 Federal Home Loan Bank 03/27/2013 500,000.00 496,575.00 500,000.00 0.700 313382F65 10048 Federal Home Loan Bank - 03/27/2013 500,000.00 496,736.00 500,000.00 0.600 313382Y98 10057 Federal Home Loan Bank 05/16/2013 500,000.00 488,428.00 500,000.00 1.000 3133834Y4 10059 Federal Home Loan Bank 05/29/2013 500,000.00 486,583.50 500,000.00 U40 3134G3550 10040 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 10/26/2012 500,000.00 500,049.00 499,813.16 0.625 3134G47G7 10064 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 06/26/2013 500,000.00 495,630.00 500,000.00 1.400 3134G36A3 10065 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 08/01/2013 500,000.00 500,187.50 499,547.02 0.600 3135GONF6 10031 Federal National Mtg Assn 08/21/2012 500,000.00 497,510.50 499,543.33 1.000 3036G04M0 10042 Federal National Mtg Assn 11/21/2012 500,000.00 500,170.00 500,000.00 0.750 3135GOPA5 10062 Federal National Mtg Assn 06/03/2013 500,000.00 500,304.00 500,000.00 0 600 3136G1TN9 10068 Federal National Mtg Assn 09/12/2013 555,000.00 557,424.24 554,892.02 2.050 3136G1UW7 10069 Federal National Mtg Assn 09/26/2013 500,000.00 501,395.00 500,000.00 1.050 Subtotal and Average 10,051,657.25 10,055,000.00 9,974,888.24 10,051,693.99 Negotiable CD 02005QVNO 10005 Ally Bank UT 10/05/2011 248,000.00 249,799.98 248,000.00 1.300 02587DMV7 10052 American Express Centurion Bk 05/02/2013 248,000.00 242,106.78 248 00000 1.100 06740KFH5 10018 Barclays Bank 12/21/2011 248,000.00 252,487.31 248000.00 2.000 05568PV95 10024 BMW Bank 04/13/2012 248,000.00 250,651.62 248000.00 1.750 06425HYAS 10003 Bank of China - NY 01/25/2012 248,000.00 248224.94 248,000.00 0.900 17284CKN3 10067 CIT Bank 08/14/2013 248,000.00 246,600.04 248,000.00 1.900 20451 PBV7 10066 Compass Bank 08/07/2013 248,000.00 246,574.25 248,000.00 1.750 25467051`5 10020 Discover Bank 03/21/2012 248,000.00 251,229.46 248,000.00 1.600 33764JEH4 10012 First Bank Puerto Rico 06/08/2012 249,00000 250,457.15 249,000.00 1.250 Run Date: 1111912013-1007 1 1 0,244 1 1 0.244 1,459 1,088 0.633 10/24/2016 1,826 41 0.840 12/12/2017 1,826 1,503 0.850 12/13/2017 1,263 1,050 0.600 09/16/2016 1,461 181 0.690 05/01/2017 1,826 188 0.960 05/08/2018 1,461 189 0.678 05/09/2017 1,371 1,152 0.700 12/27/2016 1,826 56 0.600 03/27/2018 1,826 1,657 1.000 05/16/2018 1,826 1,670 1.040 05/29/2018 1,467 1,096 0.638 11/01/2016 1,826 55 1.400 06/26/2018 970 27. 0.775 03/28/2016 1,826 20 1.081 08/21/2017 1,461 1,116 0.750 11/21/2016 1,019 47 0,600 03/18/2016 1,826 131 2.054 09/12/2018 1,096 145 1.050 09/26/2016 1,566 570 0.895 1,097 339 1.119 10/06/2014 1,826 1,643 1.101 05/02/2018 1,827 1,146 2.002 12/21/2016 1,826 1,259 1.751 04113/2017 733 87 0.901 01/27/2014 1,826 1,747 1.901 08/14/2018 1,826 1,740 1.751 08/07/2018 1,826 1,236 1.601 03121/2017 1,461 950 1251 06/08/2016 Portfolio POOL AP PM (PRE PW) 7 3 0 Report Ver. 7.3.3b City of Diamond Bar Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments October 31, 2013 Average Purchase CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Negotiable CD 316777HH7 3616OWK57 36157QCN5 38143AMV4 446438NSS 856284D76 464209BR5 48124JAH1 49306SRT5 51210SITY6 58403BYC4 686184TK8 786580YA2 795450NV3 80928EJC5 84603M2B1 --- 98146QBN0 10046 10026 10025 10021 10004 10022 10054 10023 10053 10061 10007 10055 10009 10030 10063 10029 10016 Wells Fargo Sweep Account SWEEP 10036 Floating Rate Notes 949746NA5 10050 Run Dare: 11119/2013-1007 Stated Ronk Values Rata Term to YTM/C Page 2 Fifth Third Bank 03/06/2013 248,000.00 247,914.44 248,000.00 0.400 '', 365 125 0.400 03/06/2014 GE Capital Financial Inc. 05/04/2012 246,000.00 249,660.36 248,000.00 1.750 1,826 1,280 1.751 05/04/2017 GE Capital Retail Bank 05/04/2012 248,000.00 249,660.36 248,000.00 1,750 1,826 1,280 1.751 05/04/2017 Goldman Sachs Bank 03/21/2012 248,000.00 249,180.48 248,000.00 1.600 1,826 1,236 1.601 03/21/2017 Huntington National Bank 01/27/2012 248,000.00 248,168.39 248,000.00 0.800 731 87 0.801 01/27/2014 State Bank of India 03/23/2012 248,000.00 251,213.58 248,000.00 1.650 1,826 1,238 1.651 03/23/2017 Isabella Bank &Trust Company 05/30/2013 248,000.00 242,095.12 248,000.00 0.750 1826 1,671 0.763 05/30/2018 JP Morgan Chase 03/29/2012 246,000.00 247,017.95 246,000.00 1.125 1,826 1,244 1.100 03/29/2017 Key Bank U S A, N A 05/08/2013 248,000.00 247,013.95 246,000.00 0.450 915 738 0.376 11/09/2015 Lakeside Bank 05/17/2013 248,000.00 244,931.99 248,000.00 0.750 1,461 1,293 0.750 05/17/2017 Medallion Bank 06/08/2012 248,000.00 249,022.75 248,000.00 0.750 913 402 0.750 12/08/2014 Oriental Bank &Trust 05/16/2013 248,000.00 246,003.35 248,000.00 0.650', 1,096 927 0.651 05/16/2016 Safra National Bank 01/31/2012 248,000.00 250,239.94 248,000.00 1.000 1,095 455 1.001 01/30/2015 Sallie Mae Bank 08/15/2012 248,000.00 249,669.04 248,000.00 1.750 1,826 1,383 1.751 08/15/2017 Scotiabank Be Puerto Rico 06/07/2013 248,000.00 245,913.33 248,000.00 0.700 '.. 1,096 949 0.701 06/07/2016 Sovereign Bank 07/05/2012 248,000.00 248,639.59 248,000.00 0.850 732 248 0.850 07/07/2014 World Financial Capital Bank 11/16/2011 248,000.00 248,972.66 247,547.57 1.500 1,827 1,111 1.564 11/16/2016 Subtotal and Average 6,446,541.46 6,447,000.00 6,453,448.81 6,446,547.57 1,433 993 1.215 Wells Fargo 07/01/2012 676,630.38 676,630.38 676,630.38 0.010 1 1 0.010 Subtotal and Average 819,329.41 676,630.38 676,630.38 676,630.38 1 1 0.010 Wells Fargo 04/10/2013 750,000.00 748,632.00 749,584.75 0.476 931 726 0.501 10/28/2015 Subtotal and Average 749,576.17 750,000.00 748,632.00 749,584.75 931 726 0.501 Total and Average 22,616,298.67 21,980,043.30 21,907,310.80 21,975,869.61 1,169 577 0.828 Portfolio POOL AP PM (PRF_PM2) 7 3 0 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR - CITY TREASURER'S REPORT CASH BALANCE AS OF June 30, 2013 (Revised) BEGINNING CASH BALANCE $27,107,373.89 CASH RECEIVED Cash Receipts $1,325,392.59 Total Cash Received $1,325,392.59 $28,432,766.48 EXPENDITURES Checks Written ($1,889,827.84) Payroll Transfers (368,197.90) Wire Transfers 0.00 Returned Checks 0.00 Charge Card Fees & Other Adjustments (4,383.12) Total Expenditures ($2,262,408.86) CASH BALANCE AS OF: June 30, 2013 $26,170,357.62 TOTAL CASH BREAKDOWN Active Funds General Account $9,151.14 Payroll Account $41,311.95 Change Fund $1,000.00 Petty Cash Account $500.00 Cash With Fiscal Agent $2.88 Unamortized Discount on Investments $3,977.30 Total Active Funds $55,943.27 Investment Funds: Local Agency Investment Fund $9,490,158.20 Corporate Floating Rate Notes $749,514.40 Federal Agency Callable $8,497,010.82 Bank Negotiable CDs $6,446,497.48 Wells Fargo Advantage Money Market Fund $931,233.45 Total Investment Funds $26,114,414.35 CASH BALANCE AS OF: June 30, 2013 $26,170,357.62 Average Yield to Maturity 0.672% FY2012-13 Year -To -Date Interest Earnings $164,832.20 FY2012-13 Budgeted Annual Interest Earnings $189,600.00 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR - CITY TREASURER'S REPORT CASH BALANCE AS OF July 31, 2013 (Revised) BEGINNING CASH BALANCE $26,170,357.62 CASH RECEIVED Cash Receipts $1,437,937.99 Total Cash Received $1,437,937.99 $27,608,295.61 EXPENDITURES Checks Written ($2,115,866.41) Payroll Transfers (381,625.12) Wire Transfers (418,370.00) Returned Checks (174.00) Charge Card Fees & Other Adjustments (2,912.47) Total Expenditures ($2,918,948.00) CASH BALANCE AS OF: July 31, 2013 $24,689,347.61 TOTAL CASH BREAKDOWN Active Funds General Account $282,050.71 Payroll Account $201,273.06 Change Fund $1,000.00 Petty Cash Account $500.00 Cash With Fiscal Agent $3.20 Unamortized Discount on Investments $3,885.90 Total Active Funds $488,712.87 Investment Funds: Local Agency Investment Fund $8,046,500.43 Corporate Floating Rate Notes $749,532.13 Federal Agency Callable $8,497,071.86 Bank Negotiable CDs $6,446,510.11 Wells Fargo Advantage Money Market Fund $461,020.21 Total Investment Funds $24,200,634.74 CASH BALANCE AS OF: July 31, 2013 $24,689,347.61 Average Yield to Maturity 0.710% FY2013-14 Year -To -Date Interest Earnings $14,308.36 FY2013-14 Budgeted Annual Interest Earnings $180,950.00 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR - CITY TREASURER'S REPORT CASH BALANCE AS OF August 31, 2013 (Revised) BEGINNING CASH BALANCE $24,689,347.61 CASH RECEIVED Cash Receipts$1,737,951.79 Total Cash Received $1,737,951.79 $26,427,299.40 Checks Written ($1,377,583.53) Payroll Transfers (577,383.88) Wire Transfers 0.00 Returned Checks 0.00 Charge Card Fees & Other Adjustments (3,958.89) Total Expenditures ($1,958,926.30) CASH BALANCE AS OF: August 31, 2013 $24,468,373.10 TOTAL CASH BREAKDOWN Active Funds General Account ($56,746.76) Payroll Account $50,000.90 Change Fund $1,000.00 Petty Cash Account $500.00 Cash With Fiscal Agent $3.20 Unamortized Discount on Investments $4,278.86 Total Active Funds ($963.80) Investment Funds: Local Agency Investment Fund $7,346,500.43 Corporate Floating Rate Notes $749,549.86 Federal Agency Callable $8,996,648.55 Bank Negotiable CDs $6,446,522.73 Wells Fargo Advantage Money Market Fund $930,115.33 Total Investment Funds $24,469,336.90 CASH BALANCE AS OF: August 31, 2013 $24,468,373.10 Average Yield to Maturity 0.723% FY2013-14 Year -To -Date Interest Earnings $30,863.76 FY2013-14 Budgeted Annual Interest Earnings $180,950.00 CITY OF DIAMOND BAR - CITY TREASURER'S REPORT CASH BALANCE AS OF September 30, 2013 (Revised) BEGINNING CASH BALANCE $24,468,373.10 CASH RECEIVED Cash Receipts $976,326.57 Total Cash Received $976,326.57 $25,444,699.67 EXPENDITURES Checks Written ($2,079,229.48) Payroll Transfers (360,329.70) Wire Transfers 0.00 Returned Checks (914.01) Charge Card Fees & Other Adjustments (3,452.49) Total Expenditures ($2,443,925.68) CASH BALANCE AS OF: September 30, 2013 $23,000,773.99 TOTAL CASH BREAKDOWN Active Funds General Account ($228,401.39) Payroll Account $50,000.90 Change Fund $1,000.00 Petty Cash Account $500.00 Cash With Fiscal Agent $3.20 Unamortized Discount on Investments $4,282.59 Total Active Funds ($172,614.70) Investment Funds: Local Agency Investment Fund $5,096,500.43 Corporate Floating Rate Notes $749,567.02 Federal Agency Callable $10,051,615.44 Bank Negotiable CDs $6,446,534.95 Wells Fargo Advantage Money Market Fund $829,170.85 Total Investment Funds $23,173,388.69 CASH BALANCE AS OF: September 30, 2013 $23,000,773.99 Average Yield to Maturity 0.801% FY2013-14 Year -To -Date Interest Earnings $43,286.16 FY2013-14 Budgeted Annual Interest Earnings $180,950.00 CITY COUNCIL Agenda # 6.6 Meeting Date: 12/03/2013 AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council VIA: James DeStefano, City M e TITLE: APPROVAL OF APPLICATION O BE RECERTIFIED ASA TREE CITY USA FOR 2013 (12TH YEAR) AND AUTHO IZATION FOR THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE APPLICATION. RECOMMENDATION: Approve. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None BACKGROUND: Staff has prepared applications for Tree City USA. The National Arbor Day Foundation, in cooperation with the United States Forest Service and the National Association of State Foresters, recognizes towns and cities across America that meet the four standards of the Tree City USA program. The four standards are: 1) establishing a department to oversee the tree maintenance program; 2) establishing a community tree ordinance; 3) establishing a forestry program with an annual budget of at least $2 per capita; and 4) proclaiming and celebrating Arbor Day in Diamond Bar. The City of Diamond Bar received its first distinction of being recognized as a Tree City USA in 2001 and has maintained its designation each year since by successfully meeting the standards of the recertification process. DISCUSSION: On November 20, 2001, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 03 (2001) establishing the community forestry program and designating the Community Services Department as the department responsible for the tree maintenance program. The adoption of this ordinance meets standards one and two for Tree City USA. On June 12, 2012 the City Council adopted the 2012/13FY budget, which includes $198,835 funding related to tree maintenance. This along with tree donations and volunteer hours for Arbor Day meets the third standard, appropriation of at least $2 per capita (or about $120,000 minimum) for annual tree maintenance costs. The fourth standard was met when the City Council proclaimed April 16, 2013 Arbor Day in Diamond Bar and a celebration on that date was conducted at Pantera Elementary School. PREPARED BY: Alison Ve�ers, Community Services Coordinator REVIEWED BY: nity Services Director Attachments: Application for Tree City USA for Recertification Page 1 of 1 Print this. page..'' PEPBNCMEO E- DICNBODIA i=_i OELP PEGCNOASN Tree City USA , AHLIDIPCHNI +� Application for Certification rur -IW- 2013 n, u The Tree City USA award is in recognition of work completed by the community during the 2013 calendar year. As Mayor or Equivalent of the Community of Diamond Bar I herewith make application for this community to be officially certified/recertified as a Tree City USA for 2013, having achieved the standards set forth by the Arbor Day Foundation as noted below. Standard 1: A Tree Board or Department Community has a Tree Board only Tree Board Chair Bob Rose Tree Board Chairperson 909-839-7061 bob.rose@ci.diamond-bar.ca.us Standard 2: A Community Tree Ordinance 1%I Our community ordinance is on record Standard 3: A Community Forestry Program with an Annual Budget of at Least $2 Per Capita Total Community Forestry Expenditures $187008.25 Community Population 54764 Per Capita Spending $3.41 Standard 4: An Arbor Day Observance and Proclamation Official Arbor Day proclamation is on record Mayor or Equivalent Signature - Title Date Application Certification To Be Completed By The State Forester: Diamond Bar The above named community has made formal application to this office. I am pleased to advise you that we reviewed the application and have concluded that, based on the information contained herein, said community is eligible to be certified as a Tree City USA community, for the 2013 calendar year, having in my opinion met the four standards required for recognition. State Forester Signature .Title Date , F?, Arbor DaTYIad?Ilndatiegif t Pnnt this page https://portal.arborday.org/TreeCityPrintForm.aspx 11/25/2013 CITY COUNCIL Agenda # 6.7 Meeting Date: December 3, 2013 AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council VIA: James DeStefano, City Man g TITLE: APPROVAL OF CONTRACTy AMENDMENT NO. 4 CORPORATION FOR ON-CALL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING THE AMOUNT OF $20,000. RECOMMENDATION: Approve. FINANCIAL IMPACT: WITH KOA SERVICES IN The current FY 2013-2014 Budget includes an appropriation of $20,000 for Citywide Traffic Signal Timing Plans. Due to necessary services including support for the Traffic Management System update, the current P.O. ($20,000) will be depleted by the end of this month. The additional $20,000 was approved by Metro and is entirely funded by Prop C Local Return Funds. Upon approval, the requested amendment No. 4 will cover services through the end of Fiscal Year 2013-2014. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: KOA Corporation has been providing as needed on-call traffic engineering services and Citywide traffic signal timing to the City since 2010. Because of the firm's familiarity with the operations of Diamond Bar traffic signals and traffic management center functionality, it will be beneficial to continue to use KOA's service support. This additional amount of $20,000 to cover services through the end of the Fiscal Year 2013-2014 with the current fiscal contract amount with KOA Corporation will exceed the City Manager's authority of $25,000. Therefore, Public Works Department is requesting City Council approval of the attached KOA's amendment No. 4. PREPARED BY: Christian Malpica, Associate Engineer REVIEWED BY: Date Prepared: November 26, 2013 David G. Liu, Director of Public Works Attachment: Agreement to the Consulting Service Agreement AMENDMENT NO. 4 ON-CALL CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT This Amendment No.4 to the On -Call Consulting Services Agreement is made and entered into this 3rd day of December, 2013 between the CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, a Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "CITY') and KOA Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT"). A. RECITALS: (i) The CITY has heretofore entered into an Agreement, with CONSULTANT to provide professional engineering services, which the Agreement was dated October 26, 2010. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and CONSULTANT: Section 1: Each party to this Amendment No. 4 acknowledges that no representation by any party which is not embodied herein nor any other agreement, statement, or promise not contained in this Amendment No. 4 shall be valid and binding. Any modification of this Amendment No. 4 shall be effective only if it is in writing signed by the parties. Total payment to Consultant pursuant to this Amendment shall not exceed ($20,000.00) dollars. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 4 as of the day and year first set forth above: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CONSULTANT: KOA Corporation By: City Attorney ATTEST: CITY OF DIAMOND BAR Min Zhou, P.E. Vice President Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk Mayor CITY COUNCIL Agenda # 6.8 Meeting Date : December 3,2013 AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council VIA: James DeStefano, City M; ,t TITLE: APPROVAL OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE RESIDENTIAL AREA 1B (BOUNDED BY SR57/60 TO THE NORTH, GRAND AVE./DIAMOND BAR BLVD. TO THE SOUTH AND THE NEIGHBORHOOD SURROUNDING QUAIL SUMMIT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL) AND ARTERIAL ZONE 7 (GOLDEN SPRINGS DRIVE BETWEEN LAVENDER DRIVE AND BREA CANYON ROAD AND DIAMOND BAR BLVD. BETWEEN BREA CANYON CUT-OFF AND BREA CANYON ROAD) ROAD MAINTENANCE PROJECT RECOMMENDATION: Approve and file. FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no financial impact. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The City Council awarded a construction contract to Hardy & Harper, Inc. on June 4, 2013 in an amount not to exceed $1,345,000 with a contingency amount of $67,250 for a total authorization amount of $1,412,250. The City authorized the Notice to Proceed for the construction project on July 22, 2013. Hardy & Harper, Inc.. has completed all work required of this project. The final construction cost of the project is $1,295,158.42 which includes $6,420 in change orders for additional slurry seal for the parking lot of Paul C. Grow Park and thermoplastic striping at the intersection of Brea Canyon Road and Golden Springs Drive. The project was completed $49,841.58 under the original contract amount and $117,091.58 under the overall authorized project budget. PREPARED BY: Kimberly M. Young, Associate Engineer REVIEWzED Yi / Z Z David G. L=iia, Director of Public Works Attachments: Notice of Completion DATE PREPARED: November 22. 2013 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 21810 COPLEY DRIVE DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA 91765 ATTENTION: CITY CLERK NOTICE OF COMPLETION Notice pursuant to Civil Code Section 3093, must be filed within 10 days after completion. Notice is hereby given that: 1. The undersigned is the owner or corporate officer of the owner of the interest or estate stated below in the property hereinafter described: 2. The full name of the owner is City of Diamond Bar 3. The full address of the owner is 21810 Coolev Drive 4. The nature of the interest or estate of the owner is; (if oder then tue, mike "In fee° and inseq for exarople "pamheseruader eonh'actofpurchase;' or "Ieece,) 5. The full names and full addresses of all persons, if any, who hold title with the undersigned as joint tenants or as tenants in common are: NAMES ADDRESSES 6. A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was completed on November 15, 2013. The work done was: Residential/Collector Area 1b and Arterial Zone 7 Road Mairdenmice Project 7. The name of the contractor, if any, for such work of improvement was Hardy & Harper, Inc. (Ifno wrtreotnrforwork ofimprovernmt as awhole,insert"cone") more ofConaact) 8. The propertyon which said worts of improvement was completed is in the City of Diamond Bar, County of Los Angeles, State of California, and is described as follows. Residential/Collector Area lb and Arterial Zone 7 Road Maintenance Proiect 9. The street address of said property Dated: Verification for Individual Owen (if. street add®ss has bee. ofioially sssigoed, insert `5m.e') CITY OF DIAMOND BAR Signature ofooarr or eorpoune officer ofownunaoe in paragraph 2 orhis agent VERIFICATION I, the undersigned, say: I am the Director of Public Works the declarant of the foregoing ('resident of", "Manager of" "A partner of," "Owner of" etc.) notice of completion; I have read said notice of completion and know the contests thereof; the same is true of my own knowledge. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct Executed on , 20 _ at Diamond Bar , California (Date ofsigoalore) (Ci"11=signed) (Personal signature oftire individual who w swearing that the contenn of the notice ofcompletion are frac) CITY COUNCIL Agenda # 8 , 1 Meeting Date: December 3, 2013 AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council VIA: James DeStefano, City Ma 'a r TITLE: Willow Heights—Vesting Tentati Tr ct Map No. 72295, Development Review and Tree Permit (planning Case No. PL2013-229) PROPERTY OWNERS: Walnut Valley Unified School District ("WVUSD") and City of Diamond Bar ("City") APPLICANT: Lennar Homes of California, Inc. ("Lennar") 25 Enterprise, Suite 300, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 PROJECT LOCATION: Commonly referred to as "Site D," the subject property is comprised of approximately 30 acres located at the southeast corner of Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard (Los Angeles County Assessor's Parcel Numbers 8714-002-900, 8714-002-901, 8714-002-902, 8714-002-903 and 8714-015-001). RECOMMENDATION: Consider the options outlined in the staff report and take one of the actions listed on Page 5. BACKGROUND: The City Council conducted a public hearing on November 19, 2013, closed the public hearing, and continued this item to December 3, 2013 in order to allow staff to obtain information about the feasibility and procedural requirements associated with covering the segment of the Brea Canyon Flood Control Channel that bifurcates the proposed Site D neighborhood park. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS: The Los Angeles County Department of Public Works would likely grant a permit to replace the existing concrete -lined channel with a reinforced concrete box storm drain that could then be covered with earth and landscaping. The construction cost to the developer would likely exceed $2 million. The City would be required to enter into a Page 1 Use Agreement with the Los Angeles County Flood Control District in order to incorporate the channel covering into the park. In addition to routine park maintenance expenses, the City would assume maintenance and insurance obligations. In order to require the channel to be covered, it would be necessary for the Council to direct Lennar to prepare a revised grading and drainage plan so that staff can revise the Addendum to the Final EIR and revise the conditions of approval in order to set forth appropriate performance standards for the completion of the park and channel improvements. The revised plans are also needed in order for the Council to approve a specific design concept that Lennar would be obligated to implement. ANALYSIS: Storm Drain Requirements The existing Los Angeles County Flood Control District's right-of-way area is approximately 0.67 acres in area, 50 feet wide, and approximately 500 feet long. It is currently a trapezoidal, concrete -lined, open culvert. It would not be possible to simply place a deck over the existing channel. Instead, the existing trapezoidal structure would have to be demolished and replaced with a 21 -foot wide by 10 -foot tall reinforced concrete double -box culvert. The top of the box culvert would be several feet below the finished grades of the proposed park, so the surface elevation of the channel cover would depend on the amount of fill placed on top of it. The graphic below illustrates a conceptual design that was provided under the Site D Specific Plan when a commercial pad was contemplated for use of a parking lot above the covered channel. This design required an average fill/cover of 20 feet above the concrete box to bring the surface elevation approximately level with Diamond Bar Boulevard. Page 2 Cross Section of Reinforced Concrete Double Box Culvert County Permit and Use Requirements: Staff consulted with the Flood Control District's Survey Mapping Property Management Division and Land Development Division regarding the procedural requirements to cover the channel. There are two components to the County's approval process to allow the channel to be covered and used for recreational purposes, which are outlined below: 1) A construction permit is required from the Land Development Division, Flood Permits Section. A conceptual plan approval process takes approximately 5 weeks. During this time, the County will determine the conditions of approval warranted for this project. After the conceptual approval is granted, construction documents can be submitted for plan check. According to the County, the entire permit process takes approximately 4 to 5 months. 2) A joint Use Agreement is required between the Flood Control District and City to use and maintain the covered right-of-way area for recreational purposes. The agreement is a lease allowing surface air rights above the channel for non -flood control purposes, subject to the approval of the County Board of Supervisors for an initial 25 -year term, which can be renewed or extended thereafter. The City would be required to maintain the easement area in a safe, clean, and orderly condition (e.g., removal of trash, graffiti, and close the gates to the underground channel structure during heavy storms, etc.). The Flood Control District has the right to cancel the agreement upon 90 days written notice if the District needs to implement a water quality or conservation mandate for watershed management purposes. The approval of the joint Use Agreement takes approximately 6 to 9 months and can be processed concurrently with the construction permit. A copy of the County's sample Use Agreement is provided in Attachment 2. Page 3 Construction Costs Details such as the degree of impacts (if any) to Diamond Bar Boulevard and the grading involved during construction are unknown at this time. However the City of Industry constructed a similar channel improvement along a segment located north of the 60 freeway, west of the former Burger King parcel, where an open, trapezoidal channel was replaced with a boxed culvert. It took approximately one year to obtain County approvals. Construction bids ranged from $1 to $1.5 million. The channel improvements for that project were smaller in size and length—concrete box structure was 7'X8'-2" and 400 feet long—than what will be required for the Brea Canyon Flood Control Channel. Based on the cost factors associated with the Industry project, it is roughly estimated that the construction costs would be $2 million for the improvements to the Brea Canyon Flood Control Channel Timeframe for Permits and Construction: Based on consultation with some engineering firms that have managed similar projects, the total timeframe from application submittal to the County to completion of construction is approximately 18 to 24 months. Other Regulatory Permits Required: If the channel is covered, the existing permits that are currently being reviewed by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) will need to be amended since the channel improvements will result in additional impacts to jurisdictional water. Implications on Project Timing: The draft Resolution approving the project as previously submitted includes a condition of approval requiring the neighborhood park to be completed prior to the issuance of the building permit for the 100th dwelling unit. Since covering the channel is a more extensive permitting process with a County agency, the condition of approval needs to be modified to allow the construction to be phased and/or bonded in order to allow Lennar to proceed with the construction of the homes without being subject to undue delays associated with the channel improvements. Operating Cost for Covered Channel Area: The associated costs to maintain a landscaped turf area above the covered channel is estimated to be $0.37 per square foot, totaling $10,800 per year for on-going maintenance expense which is incurred by the City. The annual maintenance cost for a typical boxed storm drain is estimated to be $20,000 per year. In addition, pursuant to the terms of the aforementioned Use Agreement, the City would be required to provide liability insurance and accept certain maintenance obligations. Page 4 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: The project was continued from the November 19, 2013 City Council meeting and therefore no further noticing was required. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: A Response to Comments to the Addendum to the FEIR (Attachment 3) was prepared to address what is required to enable the City Council to approve the project with a channel covering. Staff believes that the modifications to the project incorporating the channel covering can be addressed in the Addendum to the FEIR. However in order to understand the environmental impacts with covering the channel, a revised conceptual grading plan, updated hydrology study, and revised conceptual park plan is required to complete the environmental analysis. Upon submittal of this information, staff will be able to determine to what extent the Addendum to the FEIR would need to be altered and/or whether the Addendum would continue to suffice as the appropriate manner to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). ALTERNATE ACTIONS AVAILABLE TO THE COUNCIL: There are four options for the Council to consider, which are described below: 1. If the Council chooses to approve the project as previously submitted, adopt the attached Resolution (Attachment 1) to approve the Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Development Review, and Tree Permit for Planning Case No. PL2013-229, to allow the subdivision for the development of 182 for -sale dwelling units and a 2.5 net acre neighborhood public park, based on the findings of DBMC Sections 21.20.080, 22.22.150, 22.48.040, and 22.38.110, subject to conditions of approval as listed within the draft resolution; OR 2. Direct the applicant to revise plans to include covering the channel with landscape improvements and continue the item to a specified date to allow the applicant additional time to submit revised plans and studies. Upon submittal of the required information, staff will complete the environmental assessment associated with the impacts of covering the channel and prepare a revised resolution for Council's consideration: OR 3. Remand the project to the Planning Commission with specific direction from the City Council; OR 4. Deny the Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Development Review, and Tree Permit, specifically identifying the reasons the required findings of DBMC Sections 21.20.080, 22.22.150, 22.48.040, and 22.38.110 cannot be made. Page 5 Prepared by: Gra - S. Lee Senior Planner Reviewed by. -,--- Davi Director of Public Works Attachments: Reviewed by: Greg Gubman, AICP Community Development Director Draft CC Resolution No. 2013 -XX and Standard Conditions of Approval Sample Use Agreement Addendum No. 1 Response to Comments Page 6 James DeStefano From: Geoffrey Smith [Geoffrey.Smith@Iennar.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2013 4:03 PM To: James DeStefano Subject: Willow Heights Item, City Council Agenda for Tonight Jim, We are continuing to deliberate internally regarding your counteroffer to our proposal of a capital contribution in lieu of a condition requiring Lennar to cover the flood control channel. At this point we are furthering the discussions and respectfully request that our item be continued to the next meeting held on December 17th. Thank you, Geoff Geoff Smith Director of Community Development Lennar Homes - California Coastal geoffrey smith(a)lennar com www.lennar.com Office: 949-349-8285 Direct: 949-278-6661 Fax: 949-349-0394 25 Enterprise, Ste. 300 Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 2 �R,, R• M.NOW• r •, • • . , • ' 19 .1 1 1. The Subject Property is currently comprised of five parcels totaling 30 acres (Assessor's Parcel Numbers are 8714-002-900, 8714-002-901, 8714-002-902, 8714-002-903, and 8714-015-001). The Walnut Valley Unified School District owns approximately 29 acres, and the City of Diamond Bar owns a 0.98 acre strip of land along Brea Canyon Road, east of the Brea Canyon Flood Control Channel. A 0.67 acre segment of a flood control channel, owned and maintained by the Los Angeles County Flood Control District, separates the City and School District properties. The Subject Property is located in the Site D Specific Plan zone with a General Plan land use designation of Specific Plan located at the southeast corner of Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard, Diamond Bar, Los Angeles County, California ("Project Site"). 2. On February 21, 2012, the Diamond Bar City Council approved the Site D Specific Plan (SDSP), which set forth regulatory criteria to guide the development of the vacant, undeveloped 30 -acre Site D Project area. The SDSP provides for the development of up to 200 for -sale dwelling units, and requires at least two acres to be set aside and developed as a public neighborhood park. In conjunction with approval of the SDSP, on February 21, 2012, the Diamond Bar City Council certified "Final Environmental Impact Report — `Site D' Specific Plan, SCH No. 2008021014" (FEIR), and adopted "Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Consideration" for each of the significant environmental impacts identified in the FEIR and each of the alternatives presented therein. From both a programmatic and project -level perspective, the FOR analyzed the potential environmental impacts resulting from the SDSP's approval; the development of the Project Site for residential, recreational, and open space uses; the construction of housing, a recreational facility, and accompanying on-site and off-site infrastructure improvements; the occupancy of that housing and the public use of the recreational facility; and the on-going operation, habitation, use, and maintenance of the Project Site. Further, the FEIR envisioned not only the adoption of the SDSP and the land - use entitlements associated therewith, but also the subsequent r'evelopment of the "Site D" property in a manner generally consistent with the SDSP. 3. '-he Applicant, Lennar Homes of California, 9,rc., filed an application for the tollowing entitlements: (1) Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295 to subdivide an existing vacant 30 -acre lot into 63 lots for the development of 182 for -sale dwelling units and a 2.5 net usable acre neighborhood public park; (2) Development Review of the proposed architectural and landscape design elements associated with the proposed residential component of Site D; and (3) Tree Permit to remove 83 existing protected trees consisting of 75 Southern Black Walnuts, 6 Willows, and 2 Coast Live Oaks, and replace them at a 3:1 ratio with 75 Coast Live Oaks and 174 Sycamores, totaling 249 replacement trees to be planted on-site. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Development Review, and Tree Permit shall be collectively referred to as the "Project." 4. In conjunction with the Project, it is contemplated (a) that the Walnut Valley Unified School District and the City of Diamond Bar will transfer their respective interests in the Project Site to the Applicant, or its successor or assign, and (2) that the City will accept dedication of a maximum of 4.3 acres of property (designated as Lots 62 and 63 on Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295) for public park purposes from Applicant or its successor or assign. Government Code Section 65402 provides that if there is an applicable general plan, no real property shall be acquired by dedication or otherwise for street, square, park or other public purposes, and no real property shall be disposed of, until the location, purpose and extent of such acquisition or disposition have been reported upon by the planning agency as to conformity with the general plan. 5. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) has been prepared for the Project, which concludes that the Project is in substantial conformance with the SDSP and that no new environmental issues have been identified that would have any potentially significant impacts on the environment with the proposed mitigation measures included. 6. The City Council has independently considered the Addendum, along with the FEIR, and finds, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 21166, that no further environmental documentation is required due to the following reasons: 1) substantial changes are not proposed in the Project which will require major revisions of the FEIR, 2) substantial changes did not occur with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is being undertaken which will require major revisions in the FEIR, and 3) there is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the FEIR was certified as complete, showing that: (a) the Project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the FEIR; (b) significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the FEIR; (c) mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the Project, but the mitigation measures or alternatives have not been adopted; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives considerably different from those analyzed in the FEIR would substantially reduce one or more significant 2 City Council Resolution No. 2Di3-XX effects on the environment, but the mitigation measures or alternatives have not been adopted. 7. On November 8, 2013, notification of the public hearing for this Project was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers. Public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 1,000 -foot radius of the Project Site, and to all speakers who have previously attended the Planning Commission and City Council hearing on the SDSP and community workshops. The public notices were posted at the City's designated community posting sites on November 8, 2013. In addition to the published and mailed notices, the Project Site was posted with a display board. 8. On October 8, 2013, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing, solicited testimony from all interested individuals, and concluded said hearing on that date. 9. On November 19, 2013, the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing, solicited testimony from all interested individuals, and concluded said hearing on that date. 10. The documents and materials constituting the administrative record of the proceedings upon which the City's decision is based are located at the City of Diamond Bar, Community Development Department, Planning Division, 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765. NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: 1. That all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein and as prescribed under Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Sections 21.20.080, 22.22, 22.48, and 22.30.050, this City Council hereby finds and approves as follows: Tentative Map Findings: Pursuant to Subdivision Code Section 21.20.080 of the City's Subdivision Ordinance, the City Council hereby makes the following findings: 1. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the general plan and any applicable specific plan: The Project is a new master -planned gated residential community consisting of 102 for -sale dwelling units within three distinct neighborhood settings, as well as a 2.5 net usable acre neighborhood public park to be dedicated to the City. The Project is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Specific Plan as well as the Site D Specific Plan in terms of land use, and the design and appearance of the Project is compatible with the surrounding community. 3 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX The Project is consistent with the General Plan and Site D Specific Plan as follows: ® Quality Housing. The Project contributes to the diversity of the City's housing stock with an attractive housing development accommodating people of diverse ages, cultures, occupations and levels of financial status; and will serve as a visual gateway into the City with its distinctive identity. ® Buffer from existing homes. The Project is designed to minimize the negative impacts on the surrounding homes. A transition between the development and adjacent homes is achieved through 30 -foot wide landscaped setbacks around the entire site. The setbacks will be densely planted and maintained with Oak and Sycamore trees, and shrubs in order to provide a buffer between the Project and the existing residences along Ambushers Street, Pasado Drive, and Cold Springs Lane. • View impacts from Neighboring Homes. The Project is designed to create a minimal visual impact to the adjacent homes by building the new dwellings downhill on lower pad levels than the existing homes in the vicinity in order to retain view corridors. ® Neighborhood Public Park. The Project creates a community environment which nurtures social and recreational opportunities for its residents. The conceptual park plan is derived from a community consensus design produced during a neighborhood design. charette. As a requirement of the SDSP, Lennar solicited input from the residents on the design and types of amenities they would like to see incorporated into the future neighborhood park. The participants were generally supportive of the proposed park layout, and there was consensus regarding the types and locations for a number of amenities and features. ® Entry Feature. The Project offers an aesthetically pleasing development incorporating community identity through a significant landmark entry feature at the corner of Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard to mark the entrance into the City. ® Public Streetscape Improvements: Landscaped parkways with street trees, sidewalks, and bike trails will be required along Diamond Bar Boulevard, and the Project will conditioned to comply with Citywide Streetscape Design Standards currently being developed as part of the Grand Avenue Beautification Plan. 2. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development: The Project will be consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Specific Plan and the zoning designation of Site D Specific Plan, which allows for the development of up to 200 for -sale dwelling units and minimum two acre usable neighborhood public park. The Project Site is located within an urbanized area adequately served by existing roadways and infrastructure, The 4_ City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX Project will not cause any intersections or street segments in the vicinity to operate at unacceptable level of service with the mitigation measures and improvements required as part of the Project approval. Therefore the property is physically able to accommodate the Project. 3. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or injure fish or wildlife or their habitat: In order to demonstrate compliance with applicable state and federal resource protection policies designed to protect or compensate for the loss of biological resources, the following mitigation measures are part of the Project approval and were adopted as part of the Site D Specific Plan approval: ® The applicant is required to demonstrate receipt of any discretionary permits and approval as may be required from the Unites States Army Corps of Engineers and Regional Water Quality Control Board (ACOE/RWQCB) and California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFVV) and commit to the provision of compensatory jurisdictional resources meeting or exceeding the following minimal standards: (1) the on-site and/or off-site replacement of CDFW jurisdictional waters and wetlands at a 2:1 ratio; (2) the on-site and/or off-site replacement of CDFW jurisdictional streambed and associated riparian habitat at a 2:1 ratio; and (3) the incorporation of design features into the Project's design and development enhancing the site's biological resources. ® Measures to mitigate impacts to California walnut woodland will be orchestrated in concert with the replanting of trees protected by the City's tree preservation and protection ordinance. Prior to final approval of a grading permit or initiation of any activity that involves the removal/disturbance of oak and walnut woodland habitat, the applicant shall develop a detailed tree mitigation plan describing the number, size, and location of compensatory trees to be planted and outline success criteria and adaptive management procedures to ensure that the mitigation plan is successful, and submit the plan to the City for review and approval. Mitigation shall include a minimum replacement ratio of 3:1, totaling 249 replacement trees to be planted on-site. ® As determined feasible by the Community Development Director, initial vegetation removal activities shall be conducted outside the nesting season (February 15 -August 15) to avoid impacts upon nesting birds. If initial vegetation removal activities occur during the nesting season, prior to the commencement of any grading or grubbing activities, all suitable habitat shall first be thoroughly surveyed by a qualified biologist for the presence of nesting birds. If any active nests are detected, a buffer of at least 300 feet (500 feet for raptors) shall be delineated, flagged, and vegetation removal activities avoided therein until the nesting cycle is complete, as determined by the surveying biologist or a qualified biological monitor. 5_ City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX 4. The design of the subdivision, or type of improvements will not cause serious public health or safety problems: The proposed subdivision or type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health or safety problems because the site has been designed to comply with the minimum factors of safety by establishing grades that meet certain elevation targets. The site was designed to build the southeastern portion of the site (detached single-family lot pads) at a higher elevation. The design to build up the building pads along the southeastern portion of the site also stabilizes the slopes of the existing homes abutting the site. Grading of the Project Site will be conducted in accordance with the recommendations outlined in the Project's geotechnical investigation so as to assure that geotechnical stability is maintained or increased. The on-site circulation and access to the site will not result in unsafe driving conditions. Site access has been analyzed by a traffic engineer and fair -share traffic improvement requirements have been set forth, ingress and egress to the site has been carefully designed. The internal private street configuration, widths, and circulation are sufficient, which has been reviewed and approved by the County of Los Angeles Fire Department. The interior roadway layout is primarily guided by the organization of land uses within the subdivision, as well as site-specific topographic and geotechnical factors. The site was designed to build the southeastern portion of the site at a higher elevation, which resulted in the curvature of the private streets. 5. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision: There are currently no public easements within Site D; therefore, the Project will not impede any preexisting public access rights. 6. The discharge of sewage from the proposed subdivision into the community sewer system would not result in violation of existing requirements prescribed by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board: The applicant shall construct a sanitary sewer system in accordance with the City, Los Angeles County Public Works Department, and County Sanitation District Standards prior to building occupancy. A condition of project approval requires a fair share payment in the amount of $78,081.60 (based on a 15% impact to the Emergency Storage Capacity at the Castle Rock Pump Station as indicated in the Sewer and Water System Analysis dated September 24, 2013) and $29,438.71 (based on a 3.6% impact to the Emergency Storage Capacity at the Fountain Springs Pump Station as indicated in the Sewer and Water System Analysis dated September 24, 2013), to be accepted by the City prior to the issuance of the final sewer inspection sign off and sewer improvement bond release. The proposed subdivision has been analyzed under the Addendum to the FOR and found not to violate any requirement of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. 6_ City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX 7. A preliminary soils report or geologic hazard report does not indicate adverse soil or geologic conditions: The grading of the Project Site will be constructed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the recommendations contained in the preliminary geotechnical investigation to assure that geotechnical stability is maintained or increased. 8. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable provisions of the City's subdivision ordinance, the development code, and the subdivision map act: Conformity with the applicable provisions of the Subdivision Map Act, Subdivision Code and Development Code was verified by the City during the technical review of the Project. Any inconsistencies during the review process were corrected prior to the City deeming the Project complete and placing the matter on the Planning Commission public hearing agenda. Moreover, the Project is in substantial conformance with the Site D Specific Plan. Hillside Management Objectives (DBIVIC Section 22.22) 1. Natural topographic features and appearances are preserved by means of landform grading so as to blend man-made or manufactured slopes into the natural topography: The fundamental shaping of the property will be graded to be consistent with the existing topography. The existing profile of the property will be mimicked and the slopes bordering Diamond Bar Boulevard and the large slopes on the southern end of the property will add to a backdrop to the development. However, to achieve a balanced site, the areas on the northern portion of the property will be at lower elevation than the southeast portion of the property. The southeastern portion of the site will be built on a higher elevation, which results in the curvature of the private streets and two 16 -foot high retaining walls to separate the two main building pads. All finished slopes will be no greater than 50 percent (2:1). 2. The preservation of Natural topographic features and appearances are preserved through restrictions on successive padding and terracing of building sites: The site grading was designed around geotechnical constraints of the site. There are two main building pads proposed: 1)'townhome and detached -single family condo neighborhoods; and 2) detached single-family neighborhood. These two main pads are located on different elevation levels, separated by two 16 -foot high Verdura walls. The detached single-family lots are created at a higher elevation towards the southeast portion of the site with the private street climbing to the east and south into the individual single family lots, The lower %_ City Council Resolution No. 2013 XX pad consists of two tiers, with the townhomes on the lo.✓er tier and the single- family detached condos on the upper tier. 3. Major natural topographic features, drainage courses, steep slopes, watershed areas, vernal pools, view corridors, and scenic vistas are retained: The Project is designed to create minimal visual impact to the adjacent homes by building the new dwellings downhill on a lower pad level than the existing homes in the vicinity in order to retain view corridors. The buildings are located in a manner that preserves the views and is kept as low as possible to reduce or eliminate the possibility of blocking views of existing residences. 4. The preservation and enhancement of prominent landmark features, significant ridgelines, natural rock outcroppings, protected trees and woodlands (chapter 22.38, Tree Preservation and Protection), and other areas of special natural beauty: There are no ridgelines or rock outcroppings within the subject property. The applicant will replant 249 native Oak and Sycamore trees to mitigate the removal of 83 existing protected trees. In addition, the Project is required to incorporate a significant landmark entry feature near the corner of Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard to mark the key entrance into the City. The design of this feature will seek to visually draw from elements of the community and/or history of the City. The removal of the riparian features within the Subject Property was addressed in the Final EIR and will be mitigated accordingly. 5. The utilization of varying setbacks, building heights, foundation designs and compatible building forms, materials, and colors which serve to blend buildings into the terrain: The Project consists of three distinct neighborhoods, each defined by its own housing type on different building elevations/pads. Each housing type has varied architectural building details, finishes and treatment on the elevations, and there is diversity between the units from street view. Earth tone building materials and color schemes are used that blend in with the natural landscape, and landscaping is used to screen view of down slope building elevations, and slopes are planted with informal clusters of trees and shrubs to soften and vary the slope plane. 6. The utilization of clustered sites and buildings on more gently sloping terrain so as to reduce grading alterations on steeper slopes; The entire site will be graded and recontoured to accommodate the Project. The Project consists of three distinct neighborhoods on different elevations/pads. The lower pad consists of two tiers, with the townhomes on the lower tier and the single-family detached condos on the upper tier. The detached single-family lots are created at a higher elevation towards the southeast portion of the site. 8 My Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX 7. The utilization of building designs, locations, and arrangements which serve to avoid a continuous intrusive skyline effect and which afford view privacy and protection; The Project will retain views by creating building pads that remain below existing developed sites, maintaining substantial separations between existing and new structures, and limiting the building heights to 35 feet or less, as well as screen for privacy where appropriate, with heavily landscaped slopes along the site's easterly and southern boundaries. 8. The preservation and introduction of plant materials so as to protect slopes from soil erosion and slippage and minimize the visual effects of grading and construction of hillside areas: There are 30 -foot landscaped setbacks that provide screening and buffering around the site's boundaries. A dense stand of Sycamore and Oak trees—to replace the Walnuts and Oaks removed as part of the Project—is proposed to be planted within the large slopes abutting the existing residences. 9. The utilization of street designs and improvements which serve to minimize grading alterations and harmonize with the natural contours and character of the hillsides: The interior roadway layout is primarily guided by the organization of land uses within the subdivision, as well as site-specific topographic and geotechnical factors. Due to ancient landslides, the site was designed to build the southeastern portion of the site at a higher elevation, which resulted in the curvature of the private streets and two 16 -foot high retaining walls to separate the two main building pads. The design to build up the building pads along the southeastern portion of the site also stabilizes the slopes of the existing homes abutting the site. Development Review Findings (DBMC Section 22.48) 1. The design and layout of the proposed development are consistent with the general plan, development standards of the applicable district, design guidelines, and architectural criteria for special areas (e.g., theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards or planned developments): The Project is designed pursuant to the development standards and design guidelines contained in the Site D Specific Plan and incorporates the following features: Green, Sustainable Development: Provides a green and sustainability model requirement looking at energy efficiency, healthy indoor air quality, waste reduction, water efficiency, use of renewable and recyclable materials for building construction, etc. in addition, landscape irrigation will be designed for future reclaimed water connection. 9 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX Building Setbacks: The buildings will have 30 -foot setbacks from Diamond Bar Boulevard and along the perimeter of the Project Site. The building elevations along street view are articulated and diversified. ® Landscaped Setbacks: There are 30 -foot landscaped setbacks that will provide screening and buffering around the site's boundaries. A dense stand of Sycamore and Oak trees—to replace the Walnuts and Oaks removed as part of the Project—is proposed to be planted within the large slopes abutting the existing residences. ® Retaining Walls: Three-foot high, integral color split -face retaining walls will be constructed along Diamond Bar Boulevard with hedges to cover the face of the walls in order to soften its visual appearance. Two 16 -foot high Verdura walls will also be constructed as retaining walls, which are filled with suitable backfill and live vegetation planted in the individual cells. Flowering evergreen vines will be planted at the top of the slope to provide for cascading plantings to further landscape the wall. ® Fences and Walls: Three styles of decorative, privacy, and security walls are proposed: 1) plastered masonry block walls located in the vicinity of the entry gate, 2) wrought iron fences behind the rear yards of the detached single-family condos along Diamond Bar Boulevard, and 3) vinyl fences in the side yards of each unit. ® Private Internal Streetscape Requirements: There will be canopy trees such as Brisbane Box and Crape Myrtle trees planted along the private internal streets. Special landscape treatment and decorative textured pavement will be provided at the intersection of Cherrydale and the shared main driveway. 2. The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards: The Project will not interfere with the use or enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments because the Project is designed to minimize the negative impacts on the surrounding homes. A transition between the Project and adjacent homes is achieved through 30 -foot wide landscaped setbacks around the entire site. A dense stand of Sycamore and Oak trees is proposed to be planted within the large slopes abutting the existing residences. Therefore a landscaping buffer will be maintained in order to provide some distance from existing residences along Ambusher Street, Pasado Drive, and Cold Springs Lane. In addition, the Project is designed to create a minimal visual impact to the adjacent homes by building the new dwellings downhill on a lower pad level than the existing homes in the vicinity in order to retain view corridors. The Project will not interfere with vehicular or pedestrian movements, such as access or other functional requirements. A traffic analysis report concluded that the proposed Project will not cause any intersections or street segments in the vicinity to operate at an unacceptable level of service with the mitigation 10 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX measures and improvements require) as part of Project approval. The existing roadways will be improved as part of the Project. 3. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain and enhance the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by this chapter, the general pian, or any applicable specific plan: The Project is designed to be compatible and complementary to the neighborhood, and conforms to the SDSP as well as incorporates the principles of the City's Residential Design Guidelines as follows: ® Quality Housing. The Project contributes to the diversity of the City's housing stock with an attractive housing development accommodating people of all ages, cultures, occupations and levels of financial status; and will serve as a visual gateway into the City with its distinctive identity. ® Buffer from existing homes. The Project is designed to minimize the negative impacts on the surrounding homes. A transition between the Project and adjacent homes is achieved through 30 -foot wide landscaped setbacks around the entire site. A dense stand of Sycamore and Oak trees is proposed to be planted within the large slopes abutting the existing residences. Therefore a landscaping buffer will be maintained in order to provide some distance from existing residences along Ambusher Street, Pasado Drive, and Cold Springs Lane. ® View Impacts from Neighboring Homes. The Project is designed to create a minimal visual impact to the adjacent homes by building the new dwellings downhill on a lower pad level than the existing homes in the vicinity in order to retain view corridors. ® Neighborhood Public Park. The Project creates a community environment which nurtures social and recreational opportunities for its residents. The conceptual park plan is derived from the community consensus design. As a requirement of the SDSP, Lennar solicited input from the residents on the design and types of amenities they would like to see incorporated into the future neighborhood park. The participants were generally supportive of the proposed park layout, and there was consensus regarding the types and locations for a number of amenities and features. Entry Feature. The Project offers an aesthetically pleasing development incorporating community identity through a significant landmark entry feature at the corner of Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard to mark the entrance into the City. ® Public Streetscape Improvements: Landscaped parkways with street trees, sidewalks, and bike trails will be required along Diamond Bar Boulevard; and the Project will conditioned to comply with the streetscape designs in the Grand Avenue Beautification Plan (Citywide Streetscape Design 11 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX Standards), and incorporate tree wells, bus shelters, fencing and wall, within the public right-of-way. 4. The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture and color, and will remain aesthetically appealing: The Project will serve as a visual gateway into the City with its distinctive identity, incorporate a significant landmark entry feature near the corner of Diamond Bar Boulevard and Brea Canyon Road, and provide public right-of- way enhancements in accordance with the forthcoming Citywide Streetscape Design Standards currently being developed by staff. In addition, the Project has varied architectural building details, finishes and treatment on the elevations, and there is diversity between the units from street view. 5. The proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious (e.g., negative effect on property values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity: Before the issuance of any City permits, the Project is required to comply with all conditions within the approved resolution, and the Building and Safety Division and Public Works Departments, and L.A. County Fire Department requirements. The referenced agencies through the permit and inspection process will ensure that the Project is not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. 6. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA): The City certified the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the SDSP on February 21, 2012. The FOR analyzed the potential environmental impacts resulting from the SDSP's approval from both a programmatic and project -level perspective, analyzing the development of the Project Site for residential and recreational uses with accompanying on-site and off-site infrastructure improvements. With the submittal of a project -specific application, an Addendum to the FOR has been prepared, which includes minor technical changes and additions in order to determine the Project's consistency with the SDSP. The Project is in substantial conformance with the SDSP and the Addendum to the FOR documents that no new environmental issues has been identified and states the reasons to support the findings that the Project would not have any potentially significant impacts on the environment with the proposed mitigation measures included. A mitigation reporting and monitoring program (MRMP) has been prepared, which address site-specific conditions for the Project. The purpose of the 12 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX MRMP is to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures. The Project is conditioned to include these mitigation measures as part of Project approval. Tree Permit Findings (DBMC Section 22.38.110) 1. Preservation of the tree is not feasible and would compromise the property owner's reasonable use and enjoyment of property and surrounding land and appropriate mitigation measures: The Project requires the removal of 83 existing protected trees consisting of 75 Southern California Black Walnuts, 6 Willows, and 2 Coast Live Oaks. The preservation of these trees is not feasible because if would compromise the design and construction of the Project. The applicant is proposing to replant native Oak and Sycamore trees instead of Southern Black Walnut trees because Southern Black Walnuts have a tendency to have a weak branching structure and are prone to splitting. In addition, these trees do not have a lot of inventory in the local nurseries. The replacement trees will be planted at a 3:1 ratio with 75 Coast Live Oak and 174 Sycamore trees, totaling 249 replacement trees, to be a minimum 24 inch box size. The replacement trees will provide sufficient replacement of the natural landscape. General Plan Conformance (Government Code Section 65402) 1. In compliance with Government Code Section 65402, the contemplated transfer of Site D to the Applicant and the dedication of parkland to the City are in conformity with the City's General Plan. In conjunction with the Project, it is contemplated that the Walnut Valley Unified School District and the City of Diamond Bar will transfer their respective interests in the Project Site to the Applicant, or its successor or assign. The proposed Project will be consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Specific Plan and the zoning designation of Site D Specific Plan, which allows for the development of up to 200 for -sale dwelling units and minimum two acre usable neighborhood public park. Transfer of Site D to a developer for development of a project consistent with the Site D Specific Plan was expressly contemplated when the Site D Specific Plan and associated General Plan Amendment were adopted. In conjunction with the Project, it is also contemplated that the City will accept dedication of a maximum of 4.3 acres of property (designated as Lots 62 and 63 on Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295) for public park purposes from Applicant or its successor or assign. This is be consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Specific Plan and the Site D Specific Plan, which expressly contemplates dedication to the City of a minimum two acre usable neighborhood public park. The acceptance of dedication of additional park land by the City in conjunction with the Project is also consistent with the following provisions of the General Plan: 13 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX ® Land Use Element—Goal 3, Objective 3.2, Strategy 3.2.1 stakes: Within the urban residential portions of the City, require the incorporation of open space and recreational areas into the design of new projects. ® Resource Management Element—Goal 1, Objective 1.3, Strategy 1.3.7 states: Develop recreation facilities emphasizing active and passive recreation areas and actively pursue land acquisition for parks. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein and as prescribed under DBMC Sections 21.20.080, 22.22.150, 22.48.040, and 22.38.110, this City Council hereby finds and approves the Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Development Review, and Tree Permit, subject to the following conditions, and the attached Standard Conditions of Approval: MININNEEM 1. The following Conditions of Approval, including the Standard Conditions of Approval attached hereto, shall be binding on and enforceable against, and, whenever used herein, the terms "applicant", 'owner", and/or "applicant/owner" shall mean and refer to, each of the following: the project applicant, Lennar Homes of California, Inc., the owner(s) and tenants(s) of the property, and each of their respective successors and assigns. 2. The following Conditions of Approval, including the Standard Conditions of Approval attached hereto, shall be binding on and enforceable against, and, whenever used herein, the terms "applicant', 'owner', and/or "applicant/owner' shall mean and refer to, each of the following: the project applicant, Lennar Homes of California, Inc., the owner(s) and tenants(s) of the property, and each of their respective successors and assigns. 3. The subdivision shall comply with the Conditions of Approval attached hereto and referenced herein. 4. This approval shall not be effective for any purpose until the applicant/owner of the property involved has filed, within twenty-one (21) days of approval of this Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295, Development Review, and Tree Permit No. PL2013-229, at the City of Diamond Bar Community Development Department, an affidavit stating that the applicant/owner is aware of and agrees to accept all the conditions of this approval. Further, this approval shall not be effective until the applicant pays the remaining City processing fees. 5. The applicant shall comply with Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.34.050. A permanent landscape maintenance program shall be implemented ensuring regular irrigation, fertilization, and weed removal. All landscaping shall be maintained in a healthy, neat and orderly condition, free of weeds and debris and with operating irrigation 14 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX at all times. Provisions for ongoing maintenance of all areas of the Subject Property under the jurisdiction of a future homeowners association shall be set forth in the association CC&R's, which shall be subject to review and approval by the City prior to final map recordation. 6. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020, the Applicant is informed that the 90 -day period in which the Applicant may protest the fees, dedications, reservation or other exaction imposed on this approval through the conditions of approval has begun. 1. Prior to the recordation of the final map, the development shall comply with the specific requirements of Chapter 21.30 (Subdivision Design and Improvement Requirements) and Chapter 21.34 (Improvement Plans and Agreements) of the Subdivision Ordinance, as applicable. Final map approval will not be granted unless the map is in substantial compliance with Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295 including all conditions, and the applicant has entered into a subdivision improvement agreement to the satisfaction of the City Attorney. 2. The approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295 expires within three years from the date of approval if the recordation of the map has not been exercised as defined per Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Section 21.20.140. The applicant may request for a time extension if such request submitted to the City in writing is no less than 30 days prior to the approval's expiration date, subject to DBMC Section 21.20.150 for City Council approval. 3. All conditions of approval/performance standards and mitigation measures adopted by the City Council in conjunction with its certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Site D Specific Plan (SCH No. 2008021014), as revised as outlined in the Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report, which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and hereby incorporated herein by reference, shall be implemented and complied with. All required mitigation monitoring fees shall be deposited with the City 90 days prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All costs related to the ongoing monitoring shall be secured from the applicant and received by the City prior to the approval of the final map. 4. The Site D Specific Plan requires dedication to the City of a minimum of 2.0 net acres of usable public park space. The applicant has proposed to develop 4.7 acres of park space, approximately 2.2 acres of which will consist of a rain garden serving both as a required water detention facility for the subdivision and as a passive public recreational facility. In consideration for the City's acceptance of a dedication of 4.3 gross acres of public park land (of which a minimum of 2.5 net acres must be 15 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX usable), the applicant has voluntarily agreed to pay the City a one-time fee in the amount of $136,500.00 to offset future operation and maintenance costs of the 4.3 gross acres of park land, including the rain garden / detention basin. Accordingly, the applicant (i) shall include on the final map an irrevocable offer to dedicate to the City a maximum of 4.3 gross acres and a minimum of 2.5 net usable acres of property within Lots 62 and 63 identified on the Vesting Tentative flap for public park purposes; and (ii) prior to City's acceptance of the dedication, shall pay the City a one-time payment for the operation and maintenance costs of the park in the amount of $136,500.00. 5. Prior to the issuance of the building permit for the 100th dwelling unit, the park shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Community Services Director. Following completion of the park, there shall be at least 120 days for plant establishment before consideration for park turnover to the City. If the 100th dwelling unit is within a multi -unit building, the building permit for the entire building shall be withheld until the park is completed. 6. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for the first residential unit, the applicant shall submit detailed design of the park showing all the elements and amenities for review and approval by the Community Development Director and Community Services Director. The park design shall also be reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Commission prior to final approval. The design elements shall include, at minimum, the following: ® Two sets of tot lots for 5-12 year olds, and shall include swing set (could be combined in one location if space is insufficient). ® Two sets of tot lots for 2-5 year olds, and shall include swing set (could be combined in one location if space is insufficient). ® Pedestrian/maintenance vehicle bridge over Brea Canyon Flood Control Channel. ® Rain Garden interpretive area, must be fenced with lockable gates. ® Two sets of picnic areas (shall include shade structure(s) if requested by City). • Trail head for future Crooked Creek trail. ® Six stations of exercise equipment. Two drinking fountains. ® Two park identification signs. 16 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX ® Above -ground drain on the south end of the lot adjacent to Brea Canyon Road shall be covered. ® Parking lot for a minimum of six spaces, to be developed on the south end of the lot, adjacent to Brea Canyon Road. ® Corner entry feature. ® Twelve park benches. ® Centralized irrigation system. ® Decorative fence shall be installed between Brea Canyon Road and Neighborhood Park. In addition, the final park design plans shall include landscaping along the south of the pathway between Pasado Drive and the pedestrian bridge to serve as a visual barrier between the path and backyards of residences south of the development to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director and Community Services Director. The City reserves the right to eliminate any of the above park elements at its sole discretion. 7. Prior to dedication of the public park to the City, a detailed Maintenance and Operations Plan for the basin area referred to on the Project Plans as the Rain Garden shall be submitted to the Community Services Director for review and approval. 8. All concrete inlet/outlet structures in the detention basin/Rain Garden shall be adequately landscaped to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director and Community Services Director. 9. The Rain Garden shall include shade structures and benches, subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director and Community Services Director. 10. Prior to the City's acceptance of the Applicant's offer of dedication of the public park, the Applicant shall construct an "entry feature" in the vicinity of the Diamond Bar Boulevard and Brea Canyon Road. With regards to its design characteristics, the entry feature shall seek to visually draw from elements of the community and/or- its history and serve as a "gateway" informing motorists and other viewers that they have entered the City of Diamond Bar. The minimum standard of performance used to measure compliance with this requirement shall be that the entry feature shall have a value, as determined by the Community Development Director, of not less than one-half of one percent (0.005) of the total building permit valuation for all residential structures within the Project boundaries. 17 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX 11. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall prepare Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association for the approval of the Planning Division, Public Works/Engineering Department, and the City Attorney. The approved CC&Rs shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map, and a recorded copy shall be provided to the Community Development Department. Without limiting the City's approval rights, the CC&Rs shall, at a minimum, comply with the following requirements: i. The CC&Rs shall require the Homeowners' Association to submit to the Planning Division, a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. ii. The Conditions of Approval for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295, Development Review, and Tree Permit (Planning Case No. PL 2013-229) shall be incorporated into the CC&Rs, and provisions corresponding to any applicable Conditions of Approval shall be included in the CC&Rs. The CC&Rs shall require that all portions of the project be used, improved, repaired and maintained in strict compliance with all applicable provisions of the Conditions of Approval. iii. The CC&Rs shall include a provision acceptable to the City requiring the Homeowners Association and the property owners to maintain the project in compliance with all applicable water quality laws, regulations, and standards of the State, City, or any other applicable governmental agency, to implement, and fund implementation of, the approved Operation and Maintenance ("O&M") Plan for the property, and to operate and maintain the Best Management Practices ("BMPs") described in the O&M Plan. iv. The CC&Rs shall include provisions regarding the preservation of Oak and Sycamore trees as outlined in the tree mitigation plan. v. The CC&Rs shall include provisions to the effect that the secondary master suite in the NextGen homes included in Plan 2 of the 60x70 lots, shall not contain a cooktop kitchen facility and separate metered utilities. vi. The CC&Rs shall include a provision that street trees on Diamond Bar Boulevard shall be irrigated from the development's automatic irrigation system. vii. The CC&Rs shall include provisions acceptable to the City regarding graffiti abatement. viii. The CC&Rs shall identify the City as an express third party beneficiary for purposes of enforcing the CC&Rs and these Conditions of Approval and shall give the City the right, but not the 18 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX obligation, to enforce the provisions of the CC&Rs and the Conditions of Approval by any legal or equitable means, or by any method available to the HOA, against the Declarant, HOA, property owners, their successors and assigns, or other persons in possession of the Project. In the enforcement of the CC&Rs, the City shall not be limited to the procedures or processes applicable to the HOA and may use any remedy provided under law or equity, including the City's Municipal Code. Any Alternative Dispute Resolution procedures set forth in the CC&Rs shall not apply to or bind the City. ix. The CC&Rs may not be terminated or substantially amended without prior written approval of the City. 12. Prior to the final map recordation or issuance of building permit, whichever comes first, the applicant shall provide the City with a "Buyer's Awareness Package" for the City's review and approval. The "Buyer's Awareness Package" shall include, but is not limited to, information pertaining to geological issues regarding the property, wildlife corridors, preservation of Oak and Sycamore trees, natural vegetation preservation issues, maintenance program for urban pollutant basins, all mitigation measures within the Mitigation Monitoring Program and explanatory information pertaining to restrictions on the use of properties such as the secondary master suites in the NextGen homes, and similar related matters. The applicant shall give each buyer a copy of the "Buyer's Awareness Package" and shall document their receipt of the same in the escrow instructions of each lot and document their receipt to the City. 13. The secondary master suite in the NextGen homes included in Plan 2 of the 60x70 lots, shall not contain a cooktop kitchen facility and separate metered utilities. The provisions to this effect shall be included in the Buyer's Awareness Package. 14. Prior to final map approval, street names shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public Works/Engineering Department. Street names shall not duplicate existing streets within the City of Diamond Bar's postal service zip code areas. 1. This approval is for the site plan, elevations, exterior materials, and conceptual landscape plans for a new 182 -unit residential development to be constructed at the southeast corner of Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard, as described in the staff report and depicted on the approved plans on file with the Planning Division, subject to the conditions in this Resolution. 2. The construction documents submitted for plan check shall be in substantial compliance with the architectural plans approved by the City Council, as modified pursuant to the conditions below. If the plan check 19 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX submittal is not in substantial compliance with the approved Development Review submittal, the plans may require further staff review and re -notification of the surrounding property owners, which may delay the project and entail additional fees. 3. Prior to building permit issuance, landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for review and approval by the City's Consulting Landscape Architect for compliance with the Water Conservation Landscaping Ordinance. Appropriate and sufficient irrigation shall be provided to the Verdura walls and fast growing plant materials that grow all year round shall be used. 4. All existing landscaping and public improvements damaged during construction shall be repaired or replaced upon project completion. 5. All lighting fixtures shall be approved by the Planning Division as to type, orientation, and height. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate type, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 6. The applicant shall install street lighting along the internal private streets within the development. 7. The main entry gate, walls, and directory kiosk shall include decorative pilasters such as stacked stone or similar material, subject to the review and approval of the Planning Division. 8. The emergency access gate at the end of Pasado Drive shall have a decorative pattern, and final design shall be subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director and Community Services Director. 9. All landscape areas on the site as well as contiguous landscaped slopes along Diamond Bar Boulevard shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy and thriving conditions, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 10. Prior to the issuance of building permits, house numbering plans shall be submitted to and approved by the City Public Works Department. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. 11. Best Management Practices (BMP) devices shall be designed in consultation with the Greater Los Angeles County Vector Control District and shall be of a type which minimizes the potential for vector (public 20 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX nuisance) problems and maintained throughout the project life so as not to contribute to those problems. Unless accepted by the County and/or by the City, the responsibilities for and the funding of the maintenance of BMPs shall constitute obligations of the homeowners association. 12. In order to demonstrate compliance with applicable State and federal resource protection policies designed to protect or compensate for the loss of biological resources, prior to the issuance of grading permit, where applicable, the Applicant shall provide the Community Development Director with documentation of receipt of the following permits: (1) Section 401 (Federal Clean Water Act) water quality certification or waiver of waste discharge requirements from the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region; (2) nationwide Section 404 (Federal Clean Water Act) permit from the Unites States Army Corps of Engineers; and (3) Section 1602 (California Fish and Game Code) streambed alteration agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game. The Applicant shall comply with all associated permit requirements. 13. As determined feasible by the Community Development Director, initial vegetation removal activities shall be conducted outside the nesting season (February 15 -August 15) to avoid impacts upon nesting birds. If initial vegetation removal activities occur during the nesting season, prior to the commencement of any grading or grubbing activities, all suitable habitat shall first be thoroughly surveyed by a qualified biologist for the presence of nesting birds. If any active nests are detected, a buffer of at least 300 feet (500 feet for raptors) shall be delineated, flagged, and vegetation removal activities avoided therein until the nesting cycle is complete, as determined by the surveying biologist or a qualified biological monitor. 14. Prior to approval of the park plan, the applicant shall obtain all requisite permits and approvals from the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works — Flood Control District allowing for the building of the pedestrian/maintenance vehicle bridge over the Brea Canyon Flood Control Channel, and shall provide the City Engineer with documentation, acceptable to the City Engineer, demonstrating County approval and authorization, including a complete list of all permit requirements that may be associated therewith. 15. Prior 'to the issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall submit and, when deemed acceptable, the City Engineer shall approve a construction worker parking and equipment staging plan (PESP) designed to minimize disturbance to the surrounding residences to the greatest extent feasible. Unless otherwise authorized therein, contractors and other construction personnel performing construction activities in proximity to the project site shall be prohibited from parking and/or operating construction equipment, dumpsters, trailers, or other material within a public right-of-way or other public property. The PESP can be 21 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX combined with or become a part of the construction traffic safety plan and/or any other construction management plan as may be required by the City. 16. Unless previously approved by the City Engineer, no construction access shall be authorized from and no construction traffic shall be permitted along Castle Rock Road and Pasado Drive, except as may be required to construct and maintain any project -related street and other improvements within and adjacent to those rights-of-way. 17. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall submit and, when deemed acceptable, the City Engineer shall approve a construction traffic mitigation plan (CTMP). The CTMP shall identify the travel and haul routes to be used by construction vehicles; the points of ingress and egress for all construction vehicles; temporary street or lane closures, temporary signage, and temporary striping; location of materials and equipment staging areas; maintenance plans to remove spilled debris from roadway surfaces; and the hours during which large construction equipment may be brought on/off the project site. The Applicant shall keep all haul routes clean and free of debris including but not limited to gravel and dirt as a result of its operations. The Applicant shall clean adjacent streets, as directed by the City Engineer, of any material which may have been spilled, tracked, or blown onto adjacent streets or areas. Hauling or transport of oversize loads will be allowed between the hours of 9:00 AM and 3:00 PM only, Monday through Friday, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. No hauling or transport will be allowed during nighttime hours, weekends, or federal holidays. The use of local streets shall be limited only to those that provide direct access to the destination. Haul trucks entering or exiting public streets shall at all times yield to public traffic. If hauling operations cause any damage to existing pavement, street, curb, and/or gutter along the haul route, the Applicant will be fully responsible for repairs. The repairs shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 18. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall submit and, when deemed acceptable, the City shall approve a traffic control plan (TCP). The TCP shall be consistent with the Southern California Chapter of the American Public Works Association's "Work Area Traffic Control Handbook" (WATCH), the California Department of Transportation's "Manual of Traffic Controls for Construction and Maintenance Work Zones," or such alternative as may be deemed acceptable by the City. The TCP shall describe the Applicant's plans to safely and efficiently maintain vehicular and non -vehicular access along local roadways throughout the construction period. If any temporary access restrictions or lane closures are proposed by the Applicant, the TCP shall delineate detour routes, the hours, duration and frequency of such restrictions, and the emergency access and safety measures that will be implemented during those closures or restrictions. The TCP can be combined with or become a -6-54 of the construction traffic safety plan 22 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX and/or any other construction management plan as may be required by the City. 19. As determined by the City Engineer, should project -related construction activities result in the short-term closure of the existing Class II bicycle lanes or Class III bicycle paths along Diamond Bar Boulevard and/or Brea Canyon Road, during the term of that closure, signage shall be posted and other reasonable actions designed to enhance public safety taken within the area of those closures informing both motorists and bicyclists of that action. 20. Prior to the approval of any subsequent tentative tract map or the initiation of any improvements to Diamond Bar Boulevard that would result in the elimination of the existing Class II bicycle lane within that right-of-way, the City Engineer shall review street improvement plans for Diamond Bar Boulevard and determine the potential for retention, reconfiguration, and/or reclassification of the existing Class II bicycle lane along the property's frontage, within the existing right-of-way or as a result of the dedication of additional public right-of-way along Diamond Bar Boulevard or within the tract map boundaries and linking with the existing terminus points beyond the boundaries of the project site. Should the City Engineer determine that none of those options are feasible or desirable, a study shall be conducted and, when acceptable, approved by the City Engineer ascertaining whether the near -site elimination of the existing Class II bicycle lane will adversely impact rider safety or traffic flow and what actions can be taken by the City and/or the Applicant to maintain a sufficient level of rider and motorist safety. The findings of that study and the recommendations contained therein shall be submitted to the City Council for their consideration. 21. In order to reduce freeway -related noise impacts, all residential units shall include forced air ventilation designed and installed in accordance with Title 24 of California Building Code standards. 22. Prior to the commencement of grading activities, the Applicant shall prepare and submit for review by the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department (LACSD) a draft construction security plan outlining the activities that will be instituted by the Applicant to secure the construction site and the equipment and materials located thereupon from potential criminal incidents. The Applicant shall incorporate the recommendations of the LACSD, if any, into a final construction security plan and shall implement that plan during the construction period. 23. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the LACSD shall be provided the opportunity to review and comment upon building plans and the configuration of the residential development and neighborhood park in order to: (1) facilitate opportunities for improved emergency access and response; (2) ensure the consideration of design strategies that facilitate public safety and police surveillance; and (3) offer specific design 23 City Council Reso[ution No. 2013 -XX recommendations to enhance public safety and reduce potential demands upon police protection services. 24. Prior to the commencement of grading or grubbing activities, the Applicant shall prepare and submit and the Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACFD) shall review and, when deemed acceptable, approve a fire protection program and workplace standards for fire safety outlining those activities to be undertaken by the Applicant during the construction period. The Applicant shall abide by specific project -level permit conditions identified by the LACFD. 25. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACFD) will review and, when deemed acceptable, approve (1)final water improvement plans including, but not limited to, the location, sizing, design, and fire flow capacity of the proposed water mains and fire hydrants and proposed access improvements to ensure compliance with applicable Fire Code requirements; and (2) building plans. The project's water system shall be designed in response to final fire flow requirements identified by the LACFD. 26. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall submit to the Building Official for review and approval a temporary fencing and signage plan designed to discourage access to any active construction areas by children and other unauthorized parties. 27. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall present the City with a certificate of compliance or other documentation demonstrating that the Applicant has complied with the Walnut Valley Unified School District's School Board resolutions governing the payment of school impact fees or has entered into an Assembly Bill 2926 authorized school fee mitigation agreement or is not subject to the school impact fee exaction. y, — 1. Prior to final approval of a grading permit or initiation of any activity that involves the removal/disturbance of oak and walnut woodland habitat, the applicant shall develop a detailed tree mitigation plan specifying the following: (1 )describe the number, size, and location of compensatory trees to be planted; (2) outline success criteria and adaptive management procedures to ensure that the mitigation plan is successful; (3) a maintenance agreement stipulating the applicant's obligations for a minimum three-year period, including the annual reporting; (4) the amount and derivation of the security deposit required under the City's tree preservation ordinance; and submit the plan to the City for review and approval. Mitigation shall include a minimum replacement ratio of 3:1, totaling 249 replacement trees to be planted on-site. 24 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX The City Council shall: (a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and (b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution by certified mail to: Geoff Smith, Lennar Homes of California, Inc., 25 Enterprise, Suite 300, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 and Jeanette Ullrich, Assistant Superintendent, Walnut Valley Unified School District, 880 S. Lemon Avenue, Walnut, CA 91789. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2013, BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. M Jack Tanaka, Mayor I, Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 19h day of November 2013, by the following vote: AYES: Council Member: NOES: Council Member: ABSTAIN: Council Member: ABSENT: Council Member: ATTEST: Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk City of Diamond Bar 25 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX •!V 05, 1 T, 1• 1 s i s PROJECT : Vesting Tentative Tract Map No 72295 Development Review, and Tree Permit (Planning Case No. PL 2013-229) SUBJECT: A Vesting Tentative Tract Map to subdivide an existing vacant 30 -acre lot into 63 lots for the development of 182 for -sale dwelling units and minimum two acre neighborhood public park Development Review of the proposed architectural and landscape design elements associated with the proposed residential component of Site D and Tree Permit to remove 83 existing protected trees and replace them at a 3:1 ratio with 249 replacement trees to be planted on-site. PROPERTY OWNERS: Walnut Valley Unified School District and City of Diamond Bar APPLICANT: Lennar Homes of California Inc 25 Enterprise Suite 300 Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 LOCATION: Southeast Corner of Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard, Diamond Bar, CA 91789 APPLICANT(• THE PLANNING DIVISION AT .fir. 839-7030, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING C• D •' 1. In accordance with Government Code Section 66474.9(b) (1), the applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, and its officers, agents and employees, from any claim, action, . r proceeding to attack, set-aside, void or annul the approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Development Review, and Tree Permit No. PL2013-229 brought within the time period provided by Government Code Section 66499.37. In the event the city and/or its officers, agents and employees are made a party of any such action: 26 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX (a) Applicant shall provide a defense to the City defendants or at the City's option reimburse the City its costs of defense, including reasonable attorneys fees, incurred in defense of such claims. (b) Applicant shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against the City defendants. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action of proceeding, and shall cooperate fully in the defense thereof. 2. This approval shall not be effective for any purpose until the applicant and owner of the property involved have filed, within twenty-one (21) days of approval of this Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Development Review, and Tree Permit No. PL2013-229 at the City of Diamond Bar Community Development Department, their affidavit stating that they are aware of and agrees to accept all the conditions of this approval. Further, this approval shall not be effective until the applicants pays remaining City processing fees, school fees and fees for the review of submitted reports. 3. All designers, architects, engineers, and contractors associated with this project shall obtain a Diamond Bar Business License, and zoning approval for those businesses located in Diamond Bar. 4. Signed copies of City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all partied involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of City permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Revised plans incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval during plan check. 7. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval shall be completed. 8. The project site shall be maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of approval and all laws, or other applicable Federal, State, or City regulations. 9. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and any applicable Specific Plan in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 10. Property owner/applicant shall remove the public hearing notice board within three (3) days of this project's approval. 27 - City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX 11. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of Planning and Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works/Engineering Department, and the Los Angeles County Fire Department. 12. These conditions of approval shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all future owners, operators, or successors thereto of the property. Non- compliance with any condition of approval or mitigation measure imposed as a condition of this approval, shall constitute a violation of the City's Development Code. Violations may be enforced in accordance with the provisions of the Development Code. 13. To ensure compliance with the provisions of the City Council design approval, a final inspection is required from the Planning Division when work for any phase of the project has been completed. The applicant shall inform the Planning Division and schedule an appointment for such an inspection. 14. Failure to comply with any of the conditions set forth herein or as subsequently amended in writing by the City, may result in failure to obtain a building final and/or a certificate of occupancy until full compliance is reached. The City's requirement for full compliance may require minor corrections and/or complete demolition of a non-compliance improvement, regardless of costs incurred where the project does not comply with design requirements and approvals that the applicant agreed to when permits were pulled to construct the project. 1. Applicant shall pay development fees (including but not limited to Planning, Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works Department and Mitigation Monitoring) at the established rates, prior to issuance of building permits, as required by the City. School fees as required shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permit. In addition, the applicant shall pay all remaining prorated City project review and processing fees prior to final map approval. 2. Prior to final map approval, all deposit accounts for the processing of this project shall have no deficits. C. TIME LIMITS 1. The approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Development Review, and Tree Permit shall expire within three (3) years from the date of approval if the use has not been exercised as defined pursuant to Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 21.20.140 and 22.66.050(b)(1). In accordance with Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22,60.050(c), the applicant may request, in writing, for a one-year time extension for City Council consideration. Such a request must be submitted to the Planning Division prior to the expiration date and be accompanied by the review fee in accordance with the Fee Schedule in effect at the time of submittal. 28 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX 1. The project site shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the approved plans submitted to, approved, and amended herein by the City Council, on file with the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 2. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, air conditioning condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berms, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Division. 3. All roof -mounted equipment shall be screened from public view. 4. All structures, including walls, trash enclosures, canopies, etc., shall be maintained in a structurally sound, safe manner with a clean, orderly appearance. All graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours by the property owners/occupant. 5. No occupancy permit can be granted, until all improvements required by this approval have been properly constructed, inspected, and approved. 6. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the location, size, and screening of all building utility service connections, including water, gas, and electric service, fire service, and irrigation connections shall be approved by the Community Development Director. All changes to building utility connections shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to construction. Building utility connections shall be located, sized and screened in such a manner that they have the least possible impact on the design of the building and site. The architect of record shall be directly involved in the design and placement of all site and building service connections and shall sign all plans submitted to the City which locate, size and/or screen utility connections. 7. Additional plant materials may be required by the Community Development Director and shall be planted prior to final occupancy in order to screen utility connections, valves, backflow devices, and all above ground appurtenances, etc., to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. This determination shall be made in the field after all screen utility connections, valves, backflow devices, and all above ground appurtenances, etc. have been installed and inspected. 1. The site shall be maintained in a condition, which is free of debris both during and after the construction, addition, or implementation of the entitlement approved herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether during or subsequent to construction shall be done only by the property owner, applicant or by a duly permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste from 29 -_ - City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX residential, commercial, construction, and industrial areas within the City. It shall be the applicant's obligation to insure that the waste contractor used has obtained permits from the City of Diamond Bar to provide such services. 2. Mandatory solid waste disposal services shall be provided by the City franchised waste hauler to all parcels/lots or uses affected by approval of this project. 3. All trash pick-ups shall be for individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view. I If 1. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for review and approval with the park precise grading plans. 2. A title report/guarantee showing all fee owners, interest holders, and nature of interest shall be submitted with final map plan check. An updated title report/guarantee and subdivision guarantee shall be submitted ten (10) business days prior to final map approval. 3. A permit from the Los Angeles County Public Works Department and/or Los Angeles County Flood Control District (LACFCD) shall be required for work within its right-of-way/easements or connection to its facilities. 4. Prior to final map approval, written certification that all utility services and any other public utility service related to the site shall be available to serve the proposed project and shall be submitted to the City. Such letters shall be issued by the respective utility company within ninety (90) calendar days prior to final map approval. 5. Prior to final map approval, applicant shall submit to the City Engineer the detail cost estimates for bonding purposes of all onsite/offsite improvements including grading, street improvement, sewer, storm drain, landscape and irrigation, and monumentation. 6. Prior to final map approval, if any public or private improvements required as part of this map have not been completed by applicant and accepted by the City, applicant shall enter into a subdivision agreement with the City and shall post the appropriate security. 7. Prior to final map approval, all site grading, landscaping and irrigation, street, sewer and storm drain improvement plans shall be approved by the City Engineer, surety shall be posted, and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all public and private improvements. 30 City Council Resolution No. 2013 XX 8. Prior to issuance of grading permits, storm drain plans shall be approved with surety posted guaranteeing completion of all drainage facilities to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 9. Any details or notes which may be inconsistent with requirement or ordinances, general conditions of approval, or City policies shall be specifically approved in other conditions or ordinance requirements as modified to those shown on the vesting tentative tract map upon approval by the City Council. 10. All identified geologic hazards within the project boundaries which cannot be mitigated as approved by the City Engineer shall be indicated on the final map as "Restricted Use Area' subject to geologic hazard. The applicant shall dedicate to the City the right to prohibit the erection of buildings or other structures within such restricted use areas shown on the final map. 11. Prior to finalization of any development phase, sufficient street, sewer, and drainage improvements shall be completed beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access, proper outfall for sewers and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot lines shown on the final map. 12. Prior to any work performed in the existing street right-of-way along Diamond Bar Blvd., Brea Canyon Road, Pasado Drive or Castle Rock Road permit fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Department in addition to any other permits required. 13. Applicant shall label and delineate on the final map any private streets, driveways or fire lanes to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 14. Upon recordation of the final map, applicant shall submit to the Public Works/Engineering Department, at no cost to the City, a full size reproducible copy of the recorded map. Final acceptance of the public improvements shall not be given until the copy of the recorded map is received by the Public Works/Engineering Department. 15. Prior to occupancy, the applicant shall provide to the City as built mylars, stamped by appropriate individuals certifying the completion of all improvements at no cost to the City. 16. Applicant shall contribute funds to a separate engineering trust deposit against which charges can be made by the City or its representatives for services rendered. Charges shall be on an hourly basis and shall include any City administrative costs. 17. Applicant shall provide digitized information in a format defined by the City for all related plans, at no cost to the City. 31 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX 18. All activities/improvements proposed for this VTTM 72295 shall be wholly contained within the boundaries of the map. Should any off-site activities/improvements be required, approval shall be obtained from the affected property owner and the City as required by the City Engineer. 1. No grading or any staging or construction shall be performed prior to final map approval by the City Council and map recordation or grading permit issuance, whichever comes first. All pertinent improvement plans shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval by the City Council. 2. Prior to the issuance of any City permits, the applicant shall provide written permission to the satisfaction of the City from any property owners which will be affected by offsite grading. 3. All sewer and storm drain plans shall be approved prior to grading permit issuance. 4. Prior to beginning any grading activities, appropriate rodent control shall be installed around the perimeter of the project site to prevent the migration of rodents to existing residential and commercial sites. A plan detailing the proposed rodent barriers to be used by the developer/contractor shall be submitted to the Public Works/Engineering Department and Planning Division for review. 5. Retaining wall location shall be shown on the grading plan and submitted with a soils report to the Public Works/Engineering Department for review concurrently with the grading plan check. 6. Grading and construction activities and the transportation of equipment and materials and operation of heavy grading equipment shall be limited to between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. Dust generated by grading and construction activities shall be reduced by watering the soil prior to and during the activities and in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 402 and Rule 403. Reclaimed water shall be utilized whenever possible. Additionally, all construction equipment shall be properly muffled to reduce noise levels. 7. All equipment staging areas shall be located on the project site. Staging area, including material stockpile and equipment storage area, shall be enclosed within a 6 foot -high chain link fence. All access points to the staging area shall be locked whenever the construction site is not supervised. 8. Precise grading plans for each lot shall be submitted to the Public Works/Engineering Department for approval prior to issuance of building permits. 32 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX 9. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the California Building Code, City Grading Ordinance, Hillside Management Ordinance and acceptable grading practices. 10. The maximum grade of driveways serving building pad areas shall be 15 percent. In hillside areas driveway grades exceeding 10 percent shall have parking landings with a minimum 16 feet deep and shall not exceed five (5) percent grade or as required by the City Engineer. Driveways with a slope of 15 percent shall incorporate grooves for traction into the driveway as required by the City Engineer. 11. At the time of submittal of the 40 -scale grading plan for plan check, a detailed soils and geology report shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval. Said report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer and/or geologist licensed by the State of California. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a detailed geotechnical investigation will be required to evaluate the site conditions with respect to the proposed development and provide geotechnical recommendations for design and construction of the proposed improvements. 12. The detailed geotechnical investigation shall address the review comments by the City's Geotechnical Engineering Consultant, Leighton and Associates dated August 23, 2013, and September 17, 2013, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 13. Rough and Precise grading plans shall be designed in compliance with the recommendations of the final detailed soils and engineering geology reports. All remedial earthwork specified in the final report shall be incorporated into the grading plans. Grading plans shall be signed and stamped by a California Registered Civil Engineer, registered Geotechnical Engineer and registered Engineering Geologist and approved by the City Engineer. 14, A Low Impact Development (LID) Plan conforming to the 2012 MS4 Permit issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region Order No. R4-2012-0175, on November 08, 2012 shall be submitted for review and approval as deemed necessary and may be required to be incorporated into the grading, storm drain and street improvement plans to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. All review comments by the City's Water Quality Consultant, John L. Hunter and Associates, dated August 13, 2013, shall be addressed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 15. A separate Low Impact Development (LID) Plan conforming to the 2012 MS4 Permit issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region Order No. R4-2012-0175, on November 08, 2012 shall be submitted for review and approval and may be required to be incorporated into the grading, storm drain and street improvement plans to the satisfaction of the City Engineer for any and all park improvements. 16. An erosion control plan shall be approved by the City Engineer. Erosion control plans shall be made in accordance to the City's NPDES requirements. A 33 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX separate Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is required. Grading permits will not be issued until approval of the SWPPP and the associated WDID Number have been issued by the State Regional Water Quality Control Board. 17. All slopes shall be seeded per landscape plan and/or fuel modification plan with native grasses or planted with ground cover, shrubs, and trees for erosion control upon completion of grading or some other alternative method of erosion control shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and a permanent irrigation system shall be installed per the City's Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. 18. Submit a stockpile plan showing the proposed location for stockpile for grading export materials, and the route of transport. 19. Prepare a horizontal control plan and submit concurrently with the grading plan for review and approval. 20. Prior to commencing any grading activities, a pre -construction meeting must be held at the project site with the grading contractor, geotechnical engineer applicant, and city grading inspector and engineers and City building inspector at least 48 hours prior to commencing grading operations. 21. Rough grade certifications by project soils and civil engineers and a geotechnical as -graded report shall be submitted prior to issuance of building permits for any residential structure. Retaining wall permits may be issued concurrently with the grading permits. 22. Retaining wall permits shall be obtained from the Building and Safety Division. 23. Final grade certifications by project soils engineer and civil engineers shall be submitted to the Public Works/Engineering Department prior to the issuance of any project final inspections/certificate of occupancy. 24. Precise grading plans for Lots 62 and 63, to be dedicated to the City as a public park, shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval. A separate grading permit will be required for precise grading activities on Lots 62 and 63. 1. All terrace drains and drainage channels shall be constructed in muted earth tones so as not to impart adverse visual impacts. Terrace drains shall follow landform slope conf'iguru,Jon and shall not be placed in an exposed positions. All down drains shall be hidden in swales diagonally or curvilinear across a slope face. 2. All storm drain improvements shall be installed and accepted by the City prior to issuance of building permits, for construction upon any parcel that may be 34 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX subject to drainage flows entering, leaving, or within a parcel relative to which a building permit is requested. 3. Prior to placement of any dredged or fill material into any U.S.G.S. blue line stream bed, a 404 pen -nit shall be obtained from the Army Corps of Engineers and an agreement with the California Department of Fish and Game shall be obtained and submitted to the City Engineer, 4. All identified flood hazard locations within the project boundaries which cannot be mitigated as approved by the City Engineer shall be shown on the final map and delineated as "Flood Hazard Area." 5. Storm drainage facilities shall be constructed within the street right-of-way or in easements satisfactory to the City Engineer and dedicated to the Home Owners Association (HOA). 6. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a complete hydrology and hydraulic study shall be prepared by a Civil Engineer registered in the State of California to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 7. All storm drain plans shall comply with the approved Low Impact Development (LID) Plan to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 8. Connection to any Los Angeles County Facility will require Los Angeles County approval. All approvals and any associated permits from the County shall be submitted to the City prior to approval of any storm drain improvements plans. 9. Grading and coverage of the drainage channel on Lot 63 will require approval from the Los Angeles County Flood Control District. Permits for work within Lot 63 will not be issued without written approval from LACFCD. 10. A comprehensive Operations & Maintenance (O&M) plan/program shall be submitted concurrently with the storm drain plans to the Public Works/Engineering Department for review and approval to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The O&M Plan/Program shall be included in the CC&R's as a responsibility of the HOA. 11. Easements for ingress/egress and maintenance purposes shall be reserved on the final map for the maintenance responsibilities by the HOA of the inlet structure to the detention basin/public park area. 1. The applicant shall replace and record any centerline ties and monuments that are removed as part of this construction with the Los Angeles County Public Works Survey Division. 2. Street improvement plans in a 24" x 36" sheet format, prepared by a registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. 35 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX Streets shall not exceed a maximum slope of 12 percent. All street improvement plans shall conform to the approved Low Impact Development (LID) Plan to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 3. New street centerline monuments shall be set at the intersections of two or more streets, intersections of two or more streets, intersections of streets with tract boundaries and to mark the beginning and ending of curves or the points of intersection of tangents thereof. Survey notes showing the ties between all monuments set and four (4) durable reference points for each shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval, prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. 4. The design and construction of private street improvements shall be set to City and County standards and designed to a design speed of 20 mph and all streets shall be posted at 15 mph speed limit with the concurrence of the applicant's traffic engineer. 5. Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy, applicant shall construct base pavement for all streets in accordance with soils report prepared by a California registered soils engineer and approved by the City Engineer or as otherwise directed by the City Engineer. 6. All improvements identified for the project along Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Blvd. shall be designed and constructed per the recommendations of the approved Traffic Impact Analysis dated July 18, 2013, Development Agreement dated April 20, 2012, and any associated amendments as well as City Standards. 7. All dedications of roadways shall be made and accepted by the City Council upon completion of the improvements and prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy. 8. Separate street improvement plans for Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Blvd. shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer. Improvement plans shall include details for street improvements, signal improvements/modifications, striping, landscape and any associated utility adjustments required as a result of the new right-of-way width. 9. Median reconstruction and landscape design along Diamond Bar Blvd. shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department and Community Services Department and shall be designed in accordance with all applicable City Standards, 10. Separate encroachment permits shall be obtained from the Public Works Department for any improvements made along Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Blvd. 36 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX 11. All streetscape improvements including parkway landscape along Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Blvd. shall be in accordance with the City's Streetscape Design Guidelines. 12. Upon completion of the construction of public right-of-way improvements, review of the roadway conditions will be warranted by the Public Works Department. Any damages to the roadway will be required to be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Engineer at the applicant's cost. At a minimum a type II slurry seal (in accordance with City specifications) and complete re -stripe of the roadway from the center of the roadway to the edge of gutter along the project frontage for Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Blvd. will be required. 13. All legal lots/parcels legally subdivided by Vesting Tentative Tract flap 72295 shall be annexed into citywide Landscape Assessment District #38. 14. Improvements along Pasado Drive shall include the dedication of the cul-de-sac to the City of Diamond Bar, reconstruction of an ADA compliant sidewalk, parkway landscape, and reconstruction of the cul-de-sac as deemed necessary to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 15. Improvements along Castle Rock Drive shall include the reconstruction of an ADA compliant sidewalk, parkway landscape, and reconstruction of the cul-de- sac as deemed necessary to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, E. UTILITIES 1. Easements, satisfactory to the City Engineer and the utility companies, for public utility and public services purposes shall be offered and shown on the detailed site plan and final map as deemed appropriate. 2. Prior to final map approval, a water system with appurtenant facilities to serve all lots/parcels in the land division, designed to the Walnut Valley Water District (WVWD) specifications, shall be provided. The system shall include fire hydrants of the type and location as determined by the Los Angeles County Fire Department. The water mains shall be sized to accommodate the total domestic and fire flows to the satisfaction of the WVWD and Fire Department. 3. Prior to final map approval, the applicant shall construct or enter into an improvement agreement with the City guaranteeing construction of the necessary improvements to the existing water system according to Walnut Valley Water District (WVWD) specifications to accommodate the total domestic and fire flows as may be required by the WVWD and Fire Department. 4. Applicant shall relocate and underground any existing on-site utilities to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the respective utility owner. 5. The power poles and guy poles along the project frontage on Diamond Bar Blvd. and Brea Canyon Road shall be eliminated and the facilities located underground. 37 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX 6. Underground utilities shall not be constructed within the drip line of any mature tree except as approved by a registered arborist. 7. Applicant shall construct street lights on the length of the project frontage along Diamond Bar Blvd. and Brea Canyon Road, as required, per Los Angeles County Standards and as approved by the City Engineer. The street lights shall be annexed into the Los Angeles County Lighting Maintenance District 10006 and Los Angeles County Lighting District LLA -1 (Diamond Bar Zone). Approval from the County on the street light design shall be obtained prior to approval of any roadway improvement plans for Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Blvd, 8. Applicant shall design and construct street lights within the tract boundaries per City Standards and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. In -tract street lights will be the responsibility of the HOA to own, operate and maintain. 9. Electrical transformers, water meters and any other utility facilities to be constructed within the street right-of-way (public or private) landscape area will require approval of the location/placement within said right-of-way by the Community Development Director. 1. Applicant shall construct a sanitary sewer system in accordance with the approved Sewer System Analysis dated September 24, 2013, and all associated amendments to the satisfaction of the City Engineer which verifies that capacity is available in the existing sewage system to be used as the outfall for the sewers in this subdivision. If the existing system including the Castle Rock and Fountain Springs Pump Stations are found to be of insufficient capacity, the deficiencies shall be resolved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 2. Each dwelling unit shall be served by a separate sewer lateral which shall not cross any other lot lines. The sanitary sewer mainline system serving the tract shall be connected to the City sewer system. Said system shall be of the size, grade and depth approved by the City Engineer, County Sanitation District and Los Angeles County Public Works and surety shall be provided and an agreement executed prior to approval of the final map if improvements are not constructed. 3. Applicant shall obtain connection permit(s) from the City. The project shall be annexed into the County Consolidated Sewer Maintenance District and appropriate easements for all sewer main lines shall be shown on the final map and offered for dedication on the final map. 4. Applicant, at applicant's sole cost and expense, shall construct the sewer system in accordance with the City, Los Angeles County Public Works Department and County Sanitation District Standards prior to occupancy. 38 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX 5. A fair share payment in the amount of $78,081.60 (based on a 15% impact to the Emergency Storage Capacity at the Castle Rock Pump Station as indicated in the Sewer and Water System Analysis dated September 24, 2013) and $29,438.71 (based on a 3.6% impact to the Emergency Storage Capacity at the Fountain Springs Pump Station as indicated in the Sewer and Water System Analysis dated September 24, 2013) shall be accepted by the City prior to the issuance of the final sewer inspection sign off and sewer improvement bond release. Rvmnm�� 1. All traffic mitigations shall be implemented and constructed in accordance with the Traffic Impact Analysis dated July 18, 2013, and conditions of project approval for the VTTM 72295 prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. 2. A fair share payment in the amount of $154,730.00 as identified in the Traffic Impact Analysis, dated July 18, 2013, shall be accepted by the City prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy. 3. Any changes to the proposed parking lot layout on Lot 63 from the layout shown in the Traffic Impact Analysis dated July 18, 2013, will require an amendment to the TIA and additional line of sight analysis. 1. Plans shall conform to current State and Local Building Code requirements and all other applicable construction codes, ordinances and regulations in effect at the time of plan check submittal. Work shall be in conformance to the adopted code at the time of submittal. 2. Provisions for Cal Green shall be implemented onto plans and certification provided by a third party as required by the Building Division. Specific water, waste, low VOC, and related conservation measures shall be shown on plans. 3. Fire sprinklers are required for new single family dwellings (CRC R313.2). 4. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been met. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 5. Every permit issued by the Building and Safety Division shall expire if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit or work has discontinued and not been signed -off on the job card by the building inspector. 39 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX 6. Construction activities causing the operation of any tools or equipment used in construction, drilling, repair, alteration, or demolition work shall be conducted Monday — Saturday between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. 7. The project shall be protected by a construction fence to the satisfaction of the Building Official. All fencing shall be view obstructing with opaque surfaces. 8. All structures and property shall be maintained in a safe and clean manner during construction. The property shall be free of debris, trash, and weeds. 9. All equipment staging areas shall be maintained in an orderly manner and screened behind a minimum 6' high fence. 10. Solid waste management of construction material shall incorporate recycling material collection per Diamond Bar Municipal Code 8.16 of Title 8. 11. The minimum design load for wind in this area is 85 M.P.H. exposures "C" and the site is within seismic zone D or E. The applicant shall submit drawings and calculations prepared by a California State licensed Architect/Engineer with wet stamp and signature. 12. This project shall comply with the energy conservation requirements of the State of California Energy Commission. All lighting shall be high efficacy or equivalent per the current California Energy Code 119 and 150(k). 13. Indoor air quality shall be provided consistent with ASHRAE 62.2 as required per California Energy Code 150(0). 14. This project shall comply with all Accessibility Code requirements of California Building Code Chapter 11A for all units that are considered "covered multifamily dwelling units" per CBC 1104A. 15. Where sales trailers or temporary offices used by the public are provided, accessible design is required and a separate permit is required. 16. Submit Public Works Department approved grading plans showing clearly all finish elevations, drainage, and retaining walls locations. 17. "Separate permits are required for fountains, retaining walls, fences over 6' in height, common use facilities, and entry monuments" and shall be noted on plans. 18. A height and setback survey will be required at completion of framing and foundations respectively. Location of new homes shall be staked in the field by the surveyor. 19. Prior to Building permit issuance, all school district fees must be paid. Please obtain a form from the Building and Safety Division to take directly to the school district. 40 City Council Resolution No. 2013 XX 20. Indicate all easements on the site plan. 21. LA County Fire approval is required. Contact Fire Department for requirements pertaining to access, fire flow, etc. 22. All retaining walls shall be submitted to the Building and Safety and Public Work Departments for review and approval. 23. Submit grading plans showing clearly all finish elevations, drainage, and retaining wall locations. No building permits shall be issued prior to submitting a pad certification. 24. The project shall be protected by a construction fence and shall comply with the NPDES & BMP requirements (sand bags, etc.) 25. Check drainage patterns with Engineering Department. Surface water shall drain away from building at a 2% minimum slope. 26. Specify location of tempered glass as required by code. 27. Specify 1/4"/ft slope for all flat surfaces/ decks with approved water proofing material. Also, provide guardrail connection detail (height, spacing, etc.) 28. Special inspections and structural observation will be required in conformance to CBC 1704 to 1709. 29. A soils report is required and all recommendations of the soils report shall be adhered to. 30. Slope setbacks consistent with California Building Code Figure 1805.3.1 and California Residential Code R403.1.7. Foundations shall provide a minimum distance to daylight. 31. The applicant shall contact Dig Alert and have underground utility locations marked by the utility companies prior to any excavation. Contact Dig Alert by dialing 811 or their website at wvAv.digalert.orq. 32. The location of property lines and building pad may require a survey. 33. All workers on the job shall be covered by workman's compensation insurance under a licensed general contractor. 34. Any changes to approved plans during the course of construction shall be approved by the City prior to proceeding with any work. 35. MSE walls shall be designed based on a specific geotechnical report identifying the design criteria for this specific project. 41 - - City Council Resolution No. 2013 XX 36. Accessible paths of travel are required from accessible spaces to the entrances of accessible units. 37. Limits of the MSE wall mesh/grid system shall be shown on the grading plan showing areas that shall not be interrupted where the mesh/grid system is in- place. 38. Plan 2 for the 60x70 lots shall be designed as a two-family dwelling per CRC 302.3 with a fire and sound -rated separation between each combination considered a dwelling unit as defined per CBC 202. 39. At least 10% of condo units in carriage type units shall be accessible as required per CBC 1102A.3 for visitability requirements. 40. Phasing of construction shall be approved by the Community Development Director. Phasing shall be designed to prevent "spot building" (scattered construction of structures) from occurring. Otherwise, a construction staging plan shall be provided and approved by Community Development Director to show how the "spot building" will protect the safety of new owners adjacent to construction. 41. The Building Code edition that permits will be based on will follow the date of building plan check submittal and shall be valid for 180 -days. Permits filed after 180 -days from the plan check submittal date shall meet the Building Code edition in effect at the time of permit issuance. If plans are submitted for Building plan check after January 1, 2014, the 2013 California Building Code will apply including the following: 42. Solar ready roofs shall be provided and laid out in conformance with the California Energy Code Section 110.10. This item may be based on the tentative subdivision map approval. 43. Water heater pipe insulation is required per California Energy Code 150.0(j)2 with insulation consistent with California Energy Code Table 120.3-A. 44. Field verification of AC units are required to meet energy efficiency requirements outlined in California Energy Code 150.1(b)4. 45. A whole house fan is required per California Energy Code 150.1(c)12. 1. Access shall comply with Section 503 of the Fire Code, which requires all weather access. All weather access may require paving. 42 City Council ResoluCion No. 2013 -XX 2. Fire Department Access shall be extended to within 150 feet distance of any exterior portion of all structures. 3. Where driveways extend further than 150 feet and are of single access design, turnarounds suitable for fire protection equipment use shall be provided and shown on the final map. Turnarounds shall be designed, constructed and maintained to insure their integrity for Fire Department use. Where topography dictates, turnarounds shall be provided for driveways that extend over 150 feet in length. 4. Private driveways shall be indicated on the final map as 'Private Driveway and Firelane" with the widths clearly depicted and shall be maintained in accordance with the Fire Code. All required fire hydrants shall be installed, tested and accepted prior to construction. S. Vehicular access must be provided and maintained serviceable throughout construction to all required fire hydrants. All require fire hydrants shall be installed, tested and accepted priorto construction. 6. Provide Fire Department or City approved street signs and building access number prior to occupancy. 7. The final map shall be submitted to our office for review and approval prior recordation. 1. Provide water mains, fire hydrants and fire flows as required by the County of Los Angeles Fire Department, for all land shown on map which shall be recorded. 2. The required fire flow for public fire hydrants at this location is 3500 gallons per minute at 20 psi for a duration of 3 hours, over and above maximum daily domestic demand. 3 hydrant(s) flowing simultaneously may be used to achieve the required fire flow. 3. Fire hydrant requirements are as follows: Install 11 public fire hydrants and upgrade/verify 1 existing public fire hydrant. 4. All hydrants shall measure 6"x 4"x 21/2" brass or bronze, conforming to current AWWA standard C503 or approved equal. All on-site hydrants shall be installed a minimum of 25 feet from a structure or protected by a two (2) hour rated firewall ® Location: As per map on file with the office. 5. All required fire hydrants shall be installed, tested and accepted or bonded for prior to Final Map approval. Vehicular access shall be provided and maintained serviceable throughout construction. 43 - City Council Resolution No. 2013 XX 6. Additional water system requirements will be required when this land is further subdivided and/or during the building permit process. 7. All proposed structures shall be equipped with automatic fire sprinkler, systems that are designed and maintain in accordance with NFPA 13. 8. Additional water requirements will be determined by the Fire Prevention Engineering Unit at further development of the site. IM 44 City Council Resolution No. 2013-X "Site Y Specific Pian City of Diamond Bar, California Table A-2 VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MBAR NO. 72295 REVISED MITIGATION REPORTING AND MONITORING PROGRAM Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 September 2012 Addendum No. 1: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72296 Page 44 Compliance Mitigation No, i Mitigation Measure - Verification Milestone Hydrology and Water Quality Prior to the issuance of grading permits, all drainage facilities and improvements shall be subject to final design City Issuance of 1 and engineering review and approval by the City Engineer and, for those storm drain facilities under County Engineer Grading jurisdiction, by the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW) (Mitigation Measure 4-1). Permits Biological Resources In order to reduce impacts to United States Army Corps of Engineers and Regional Water Quality Control Board (ACOE/RWQCB) and California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) jurisdictional waters, priorto the issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director, receipt of any discretionary permits and approval as may be required from the ACOE, RWQCB, and Community Issuance of 2 CDFG and commit to the provision of compensatory jurisdictional resources meeting or exceeding the following Development Grading minimal standards: (1) the on-site and/or off-site replacement of ACOE/RWQCB jurisdictional waters and Director Permits wetlands at a 2:1 ratio; (2) the on-site and/or off-site replacement of CDFG jurisdictional streambed and associated riparian habitat at a 2:1 ratio; and (3) the incorporation of design features into the project's design and development enhancing the site's biological resources (Mitigation Measure 5-1). Traffic and Circulation Prior to the recordation of the final tract map or issuance of occupancy permits for any residential development, as determined by the City Engineer, the Applicant shall complete, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, those street and intersection improvements identified in the traffic impact analysis or any supplement thereto, provide a Final Tract Map .. bond or other acceptable instruct committing to those improvements, and/or provide a "fair -share' contribution Recordation toward the cost of the improvements to the following intersections: (1) Brea Canyon Road at Pathfinder Road; (2) City or 3oai Diamond Bar Boulevard at Pathfinder Road; (3) Bea_ L3) Diamond Bar Engineer Issuance of cRe Boulevard at Cold Spring Lane; (5)(41 Pathfinder Road at Brea Canyon Cutoff; (S) (5) SR -57 SB Ramps at Brea Occupancy Canyon Cutoff, (74 n. SR -57 NB Ramps at Brea Canyon Cutoff; {94 M Brea Canyon Road at Diamond Bar Permits Boulevard; (9) (8) Crooked Creek or Cherrydale Drive at Diamond Bar Boulevard, (19) a Brea Canyon Road at Silver Bullet Drive; (41)(1 Diamond Bar Boulevard at Grand Avenue; and Colima Road at Brea Canyon Cutoff (Mitigation Measure 6-1). The final site plan shall include and accommodate those traffic measures, improvements, and such other City Site Plan 4 pertinent factors and/or facilities as may be identified by the City Engineer to ensure the safe and efficient Engineer Approval movement of project -related traffic (Mitigation Measure 6-2). Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 September 2012 Addendum No. 1: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72296 Page 44 "Site D" Specific Plan City of Diamond Bar, California Table A-2 (Continued) VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 72299 RF:V1SEi7 MITIGATION REPORTING AND MONITORING PROGRAM Mitigation Measure Final Environmental impact Report, SCH 2008021014 September 2012 Addendum No. 1: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295 Page 45 Compliance Mitigation No. Miti 9 Verification Milestone Air Quality Site watering shall be conducted a minimum of three times daily during site preparation activities within disturbed Building Construction 5 areas lacking ground coverage (Mitigation Measure 7-1). Inspector Term Noise In accordance with the Development Code, construction shall be restricted to between the hours of 7:00 AM and &-99 7:00 PM on weekdays and Saturdays. No construction shall occur at any time on Sundays or on federal 6 holidays. These days and hours shall also apply any servicing of equipment and to the delivery of construction materials to or from the site (Mitigation Measure 8-1). Building Construction 7 All construction equipment shall be properly maintained and tuned to minimize noise emissions -(Mitigation Measure 8-2). Inspector Term 8 All equipment shall be fitted with properly operating mufflers, air intake silencers, and engine shrouds no less effective than originally equipped (Mitigation Measure 8-3). The construction contractor shall place temporary noise barriers along the site perimeter when doing any work 9 within 100 feet of any existing residential units. Where feasible, such barriers shall attempt to block the line of sight between the residents and construction equipment (Mitigation Measure 8-4). The construction contractor shall specify the use of electric stationary equipment (e.g., compressors) that can City 10 - operate off the power grid where feasible. Where infeasible, stationary noise sources (e.g., generators and Engineer g Building Permit compressors) shall be located as far from residential receptor locations as is feasible (Mitigation Measure 8-5). Issuance Construction shall be subject to any and all provisions set forth by the City of Diamond Bar Planning Department Planning 11 (Mitigation Measure 8-6). Manager residential units shall be located within 830 feet of the SR -57 Freeway's nearest travel lane unless additional 12No sound attention is provided to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director (Mitigation Measure 8-7). Community Development Director Final Tract Map Recordation No residential units shall be located within 130 feet of the centerline of Diamond Bar Boulevard unless additional 13 sound attention is provided to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director (Mitigation Measure 8-8). Final Environmental impact Report, SCH 2008021014 September 2012 Addendum No. 1: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295 Page 45 "Site D" Specific Plano City of Diamond Bar, California Table A-2 (Continued) VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 72295 REVISED MITIGATION REPORTING AND MONITORING PROGRAM Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 September 2012 Addendum No. 1: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295 - Page 46 Compliance Mitigation No. Mitigation Measure Verification Milestone Cultural Resources Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a qualified archaeologist shall be retained by the Applicant and Community approved by the City to monitor all vegetation removal and ground disturbance to a depth of three feet within the Development following portions of the study area: (1) the boundary of SD -Cultural -1; (2) the open valley floor adjacent to SD- Director Issuance of 14 Cultural -1; and (3) the riparian areas that were not previously surveyed due to dense vegetation cover. The and Grading archaeologist will determine if additional monitoring below the depth of three feet is warranted based on soil and city Permits bedrock conditions and presence/absence of archaeological materials. No archaeological monitoring is required Engineer for ground disturbing activities outside of these monitor areas (Mitigation Measure 11-1). If cultural resources are identified during monitoring of the ground disturbing activities, the archaeologist shall be allowed to temporarily divert or redirect grading or excavation activities in the vicinity of those resources in order to make an evaluation of the find and determine appropriate treatment. Treatment will include the goals of preservation where practicable and public interpretation of historic and archaeological resources. All cultural resources recovered will be documented on California Department of Parks and Recreation Site Forms to be filed with the CHRIS-SCCIC. The archaeologist shall prepare a final report about the monitoring to be filed with the Applicant, the City, and the California Historical Resources Information System South Central Coastal Information 15 Center at the California State University, Fullerton (CHRIS-SCCIC), as required by the California Office of Historic Preservation. The report shall include documentation and interpretation of resources recovered, if any. Interpretation will include full evaluation of the eligibility of SD -Cultural -1 with respect to the California Register of Historic Places and CEQA. The report shall also include all specialists' reports as appendices. The City shall designate repositories in the event that significant resources are recovered. If cultural resources are identified Building Construction during ground disturbing activities that occur outside the designated monitoring area, ground disturbing activities Inspector Term shall be temporarily redirected away from the vicinity of the find until the retained archaeologist is notified by the Applicant. The archaeologist shall coordinate with the Applicant as to the immediate treatment of the find until a proper site visit and evaluation is made by the archaeologist (Mitigation Measure 11-2). If human remains are encountered unexpectedly during construction excavation and grading activities, Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 requires that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin and disposition pursuant to Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources 16 Code. If the remains are determined to be of Native American descent, the County Coroner has 24 hours to notify the California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). The NAHC will then identify the person(s) thought to be the Most Likely Descendent of the deceased Native American, who will then help determine what course of action should be taken in dealing with the remains (Mitigation Measure 11-3). Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 September 2012 Addendum No. 1: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295 - Page 46 "Site Y Specific Pilan City of Diamond Bar, California Table A-2 (Continued) VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 72295 RFVISED MITIGATION REPORTING AND MONITORING PROGRAM Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 September 2012 Addendum No. 1: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295 Page 47 Compliance Mitigation No. Mitigation Measure Verification Milestone Cultural Resources (Continued) Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a qualified paleontologist meeting the qualifications established by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontologists shall be retained by the Applicant and approved by the City to develop and Community 17 implement a paleontological monitoring plan. Development of the monitoring plan shall include a site visit by the Development paleontologist prior to initiation of project development in order to determine or delineate sensitive areas. The Director Issuance of paleontologist may also perform collections of fossils from the surface and near -surface (Mitigation Measure 11- Grading 4). Permits The paleontologist shall attend a pre -grade meeting in order to become familiar with the proposed depths and City 18 patterns of grading of the study area (Mitigation Measure 11-5). Engineer The paleontologist shall establish a curation agreement with an accredited facility prior to grading permit issuance City Issuance suance of 19 (Mitigation Measure 11-6). Engineer Permits A paleontological monitor, supervised by the paleontologist, shall monitor all excavations in the Puente Formation or excavations anticipated to extend into the Puente Formation. If fossils are found during ground -disturbing Building Construction 20 activities, the paleontological monitor shall be empowered to halt the ground -disturbing activities within 25 feet of Inspector Term the find in order to allow evaluation of the find and determination of appropriate treatment (Mitigation Measure 11- 7). The paleontologist shall prepare a final report on the monitoring. If fossils were identified, the report shall contain Community 21 an appropriate description of the fossils, treatment, and curation. A copy of the report shall be filed with the City Development Grading and the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and shall accompany any curated fossils (Mitigation Director Sign -Off Measure 11-8). Aesthetics All pole -mounted or wall -mounted luminaires installed for the purpose of illuminating homes, public park areas, private roadways, and driveways shall conform to appropriate lighting standards and demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, that light trespass will not exceed 0.5 horizontal foot candle, as measured at the City Building Permit 22 project boundaries abutting any existing residential use. These standards shall not be applied to any public Engineer Issuance streets or to any entry feature or other City -oriented signage to be constructed on or adjacent to the project site (Mitigation Measure 12-1). Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 September 2012 Addendum No. 1: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295 Page 47 Use Agreement No(s) Proiect Name -y ` a Parcel(s) E-- '- � ROW Map No(s) APN: T.G.: ` 2 Supervisorial District USE AGREEMENT This Use Agreement is entered into by and between the LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, a body corporate and politic, herein referred to as "DISTRICT" and USER's name herein referred to as "USER" RECITALS Attachment 2 The DISTRICT owns fee title to portions of tie rzcore�taa generally located 1WE in the City off or Unincorporated area — _ R:, w, State of California and, as more particularly shown on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and made a part hereof, hereafter referred to as PREMISES ; and USER proposes to use a portion of PREMISES, for :t`:pubtie=.fee`rett?if V s purposes, in connection with the USER's project known as the (the "Project"); and USER proposes to but not limited to on PREMISES in connection with the Project, includi as shown on Exhibit B, hereafter referred to as NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of these recitals and the faithful performance by USER and DISTRICT of the mutual covenants herein contained, for the 1 period, of time herein set forth, the DISTRICT and USER hereto mutually agree as follows: SECTION 1. Authorized Use 1.1. USER is authorized and permitted to use PREMISES for the a4nstructton' pail rcxrtattenand " and use of IMPROVEMENTS in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Use Agreement. Any other use of PREMISES by USER is expressly prohibited. 1.2. USER's use of the PREMISES shall be subordinate to the primary uses and purposes of the PREMISES for watershed management, including flood control, water conservation, and water quality purposes, by DISTRICT and others (pursuant to DISTRICT's permission), and USER's use of the PREMISES shall at no time interfere with the use of PREMISES or the use of DISTRICT's adjacent property and/or improvements for such purposes. 1.3 District has only easement rights] 1.4 This Use Agreement is valid only to the extent of DISTRICT'S jurisdiction. Acquisition of permits required by other affected agencies and the consent of underlying fee owner(s) other than DISTRICT'S, if any, are the responsibility of the USER. SECTION 2. Construction and Maintenance of Improvements 2.1. USER understands and acknowledges that it is required to comply with the requirements set forth in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the State CEQA guidelines prior to implementing IMPROVEMENTS and that USER shall be the lead agency with respect to any and all CEQA compliance related to the IMPROVEMENTS. In addition to its other indemnification obligations as specified below, USER hereby agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless DISTRICT and COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES and their elected and appointed officers, employees, and agents from and against any and all claims and/or actions related to the IMPROVEMENTS that may be asserted by any third party or 2 public agency alleging violations of CEQA or the CEQA Guidelines or the National Environmental Policy Act. 2.2. USER shall bear all costs in connection with the construction of the IMPROVEMENTS, including preparation of plans and specifications and all construction costs and expenses. 2.3. Prior to commencement of any construction activity on PREMISES by or on behalf of USER, USER shall submit the plans and specification for the IMPROVEMENTS to, and shall apply for and obtain a permit from, the Land Development Division, Subdivision and Permits Unit, of the County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works. USER shall also obtain DISTRICT's prior written approval should USER propose to make any changes to the approved plans and specifications. 2.4. Upon completion of the construction of the IMPROVEMENTS, USER shall provide DISTRICT with approved As -Built plans. 2.5. USER shall keep, inspect, and maintain the PREMISES and the IMPROVEMENTS in a safe, clean, and orderly condition at all times during the term of this Use Agreement and shall not permit trash and debris, including but not limited to rubbish, tin cans, bottles, and garbage to accumulate at any time, nor shall USER commit, suffer, or permit any waste on the PREMISES or IMPROVEMENTS or permit any acts to be done in violation of any laws or ordinances thereon. 2.6. USER shall remove graffiti from the PREMISES and IMPROVEMENTS and any walls, fences, and signs, which are located within the PREMISES, anytime graffiti is discovered by USER or anytime USER is notified by DISTRICT. Graffiti must be removed within the following guidelines: 2.6.1 Remove vulgar graffiti (i.e., profane, obscene, or racist) within 24 hours, Monday through Friday. 2.6.2 Remove other graffiti within 72 hours, Monday through Friday. 2.7. USER shall replace or repair any property of DISTRICT that becomes damaged by USER or any person entering the PREMISES at USER's invitation or with the consent of the USER, either expressed or implied, within a reasonable time to the satisfaction of the DISTRICT or shall compensate the DISTRICT for the damage within thirty (30) days of the USER's receipt of an invoice from DISTRICT. 2.8 USER shall close all gates and take all actions necessary to render the PREMISES inaccessible to public access in the event USER abandons its operation and maintenance of the IMPROVEMENTS or when the weather 9 forecast for the next 24-hour period is for one (1) inch of rain or more, or when notified by the DISTRICT. SECTION 3. Term 3.1. The term of this Use Agreement shall be for "�rtty f+ fes% �I Trria1' subject to the DISTRICT's right to terminate USER's use as provided for in Section 4, below. 3.2 This Use Agreement shall expire at the end of the Initial Term provided, however, that DISTRICT may extend the term of this Use Agreement beyond the Initial Term, subject to such terms and conditions as it deems appropriate, upon receipt of a written request from USER no earlier than twelve (12) months or later than six (6) months prior to the end of the Initial Term. SECTION 4. Termination of Use 4.1. DISTRICT shall have the right to cancel this Use Agreement and terminate USER's use of PREMISES, pursuant to this Use Agreement, by giving USER at least ninety (90) days prior written notice under the following conditions: 4.1.1. DISTRICT proposes to implement a project on, or including, the PREMISES for watershed management purposes, including flood control, water conservation, and water quality; and 4.1.2. DISTRICT determines, in good faith, that the IMPROVEMENTS and/or USER's use of the PREMISES, or any of them, would be substantially incompatible with the proposed project; and 4.1.3. DISTRICT has notified USER of the basis for DISTRICT's determination that a substantial incompatibility will exist and has provided USER with a reasonable opportunity to propose modifications to the IMPROVEMENTS or USER's use of the PREMISES that will eliminate the incompatibility. 4.2. DISTRICT shall have the right to cancel this Use Agreement and terminate USER's use of PREMISES by giving USER at least 60 days prior written notice, if USER breaches any term or condition of this Use Agreement. 4.3 DISTRICT shall have the right to cancel this Use Agreement and terminate USER'S use of the PREMISES if construction of the IMPROVEMENTS has not been completed within five (5) years from the date this Use Agreement is fully executed. CI 4.4. DISTRICT shall have the right to immediately cancel and terminate USER's use of PREMISES, pursuant to this Use Agreement or, in the DISTRICT's sole discretion, to temporarily suspend such use in the event DISTRICT determines, in good faith, that it is necessary for DISTRICT to enter and take exclusive possession of PREMISES in order to respond to an emergency, as defined in Public Contract Code Section 1102. In the event of an emergency, USER shall bear any expenses associated with the cessation of such use, and shall have no rights or claims therefore against DISTRICT. 4.5. USER shall have the right to cancel and terminate its use of PREMISES, pursuant to this Use Agreement, for any reason by giving DISTRICT at least sixty (60) days prior written notice. SECTION 5. Removal of Improvements and Restoration of Premises 5.1. Upon the expiration or sooner termination of this Use Agreement, USER shall, at its own expense, remove the IMPROVEMENTS and restore the PREMISES, to a condition similar to or better than that which existed on the effective date of this Use Agreement, reasonable wear and tear excepted. 5.2 Prior to commencing the removal of the IMPROVEMENTS, or any of them, USER shall apply for and obtain a permit therefore, from the Land Development Division, Subdivision and Permits Unit, of the County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works. 5.3. If USER fails to remove the IMPROVEMENTS and restore the PREMISES within ninety (90) days of the expiration of this Use Agreement or sooner termination of USER's use of PREMISES, pursuant to this Use Agreement, DISTRICT may remove the IMPROVEMENTS. 5.4. If DISTRICT removes the IMPROVEMENTS pursuant to Subsection 5.3, DISTRICT shall submit a billing invoice to USER indicating the costs and expenses incurred by DISTRICT in connection with the removal of the IMPROVEMENTS and USER shall reimburse DISTRICT all such costs and expenses for removing said IMPROVEMENTS within thirty (30) days of the billing invoice. SECTION 6. Miscellaneous Terms and Conditions 6.1. Indemnification only if the USER is the state, a city, a public authority, or public agency] 5 6.1.1.1. USER shall indemnify, defend, and hold DISTRICT and the County of Los Angeles and their respective officers, employees, and agents harmless from, and against, any claims, demands, liability, damages, costs, and expenses, including, without limitation, involving bodily injury, death, or personal injury of any person or property damage of any nature whatsoever, arising from, or related to, the construction, reconstruction, maintenance, operation, or removal of the IMPROVEMENTS or USER's use of the PREMISES. 6.1.1.2. DISTRICT shall indemnify, defend, and hold USER and its officers, employees and agents harmless from and against, any claims, demands, liability, damages, costs, and expenses including, without limitation, involving bodily injury, death, or personal injury of any person or property damage of any nature whatsoever, arising from or related to the construction, reconstruction, maintenance, operation, or removal of any improvements constructed or maintained by DISTRICT on, above, or under the PREMISES or arising from any and all uses of the PREMISES by DISTRICT. 6.1.2. USER releases DISTRICT and waives all rights to damages for any loss, costs, or expenses USER may sustain as a result of any damage to, or destruction of, the IMPROVEMENTS or to the PREMISES attributable to DISTRICT's watershed management activities, including any flood control, water conservation or water quality activities on, or adjacent to, the PREMISES, or attributable to any flooding caused by inadequacy or failure of DISTRICT's facilities, except to the extent caused by the DISTRICT'S negligence or willful misconduct. 6.1.3. Each party to this Use Agreement shall include the other within the protection of any indemnification clause contained in any ancillary contract relating to the PREMISES. 6.2. Without limiting USER's indemnification of the DISTRICT, USER shall procure and maintain, in full force and effect during the term of this Use Agreement, insurance policies providing for the following insurance coverage: ■ Comprehensive general liability and property damage coverage with a combined single limit liability in the amount of not less than TWO MILLION DOLLARS ($3,000,000) per occurrence. A ■ Worker's Compensation coverage in such amount as will fully comply with the laws of the State of California and which shall indemnify, insure, and provide legal defense for both the DISTRICT and USER against any loss, claim, or damage arising from any injuries or occupational diseases occurring to any worker employed by, or any person retained by, USER in the course of carrying out the work or services contemplated in this Agreement. ■ Automobile Liability Insurance: USER shall procure such policy with coverage of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per accident. ■ The County of Los Angeles and Los Angeles County Flood Control District, its governing board, officers, agents, contractors, and employees shall be named as Additional Insureds on all policies of liability insurance. USER shall furnish to DISTRICT a Policy of Insurance evidencing USER's insurance coverage no later than (10) working days after execution of the Agreement, but before USER takes possession of the Premises. Upon renewal of said policy, USER shall furnish to DISTRICT a Certificate evidencing USER's continued insurance coverage as required herein. ■ The DISTRICT may accept, should USER elect to provide, a Certificate of Self -Insurance. The limits of such self-insurance coverage shall meet or exceed those stated herein. 6.3. USER and DISTRICT shall have no financial obligation to each other under this Use Agreement, except as herein expressly provided. 6.4. The parties expressly recognize and intend that in consideration of this Use Agreement, which is solely for USER's benefit that DISTRICT is not to incur any liability whatsoever for any injury, death, or property damage arising from any use of the PREMISES or the IMPROVEMENTS by persons who gain entry through openings or areas provided for USER's use. 6.5. DISTRICT, its Board, and any authorized officer, engineer, employee, or contractor, through its agents or representatives, shall have full right and authority to enter in and upon PREMISES at any and all reasonable times during the term of this Use Agreement, all without interference or hindrance by USER, its agents, officers, contractors, employees, or representatives for the purpose of inspecting the same and to serve or post any notice required or permitted by law for protection of any right or interest of DISTRICT. 6.6. Except as to fuels, lubricants, and products associated with motorized vehicles, equipment, gardening, or maintenance -related substances, or all 7 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, a body corporate and politic, by order of its Board of Supervisors, has caused this Use Agreement to be subscribed by the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the seal of the DISTRICT to be affixed hereto and attested by its executive Officer of the Board of Supervisors, and the USER has caused this Use Agreement to be executed by its duly authorized officer as of the date indicated below. USER: M Approved as to Form: uate DISTRICT: LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT a body corporate and politic 0 ATTEST: Sachi A. Hamai, Executive Officer of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles 0 Deputy APPROVED AS TO FORM: JOHN F. KRATTLI County Counsel M 9 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) On January 6, 1987, the Board of Supervisors for the County of Los Angeles and ex officio the governing body of all other special assessment and taxing districts, agencies, and authorities for which said Board so acts adopted a resolution pursuant to Section 25103 of the Government Code that authorized the use of facsimile signatures of the Chairman of the Board on all papers, documents, or instruments requiring the Chairman's signature. The undersigned hereby certifies that on this day of 20 , the facsimile signature of Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of the LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, was affixed hereto as the official execution of this document. The undersigned further certifies that on this date a copy of the document was delivered to the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of the LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT. In witness whereof, I have also hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year above written. (LACFCD-SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM JOHN F. KRATTLI. County Counsel By Deputy SACHI A. HAMAI, Executive Officer of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles 10 LA Deputy STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF On personally appeared ACKNOWLEDGMENT FORM ss. before me, Notary Public, (insert name of the officer) (insert name(s) and title(s)) who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature (Seal) 11 of the above, USER shall not cause or allow the presence, use, storage, or disposal of any hazardous substances on or about the PREMISES without the prior written consent of the DISTRICT, which consent shall not be unreasonably denied. In the event of spillage, leakage, or escape of any hazardous substance onto the PREMISES, USER shall immediately notify DISTRICT by calling (800) 675-4357. If the spillage, leakage, or escape was caused by USER, USER shall promptly remove any such substance from the PREMISES to the DISTRICT's satisfaction. In addition to removing any of USER's hazardous substances, USER shall be liable for and reimburse DISTRICT for any and all cost and expenses that DISTRICT may incur or suffer as a result thereof. Such responsibility shall include cost or expenses as DISTRICT may incur by reason of Federal, State, local, or other authoritative agency's laws and regulations. Notwithstanding the foregoing, USER shall have no responsibility regarding any spillage, leakage or escape associated with any of DISTRICT's tenants, licensees or easement holders. 6.7. Any notice to be given or document to be delivered by DISTRICT or USER to the other party may be delivered in person to either party or by private courier or may be deposited in the United States mail, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid and addressed to the party for whom intended as follows: To DISTRICT: Los Angeles County Flood Control District Attention SMP Division P.O. Box 1460 900 South Fremont Avenue, Alhambra, CA 91802-1460 tel.: (626) 458-7065 or (626) 458-7072; fax (626) 289-3618 for Emergencies, contact (626) 458 -HELP (4357) H H Addendum No. 1 Response to Comments Vesting_ Tentative Tract Map No. 72295 Willow Heights Final Environmental Impact report "Site D" Specific Plan SCH No. 2008021014 Lead Agency: City of Diamond Bar Community Development Department 21810 Copley Drive, Second Floor Diamond Bar, California 91765-4178 Applicant: Lennar Homes of California, Inc. 25 Enterprise, Suite 300 Aliso Viejo, California 92656 November 2013 Addendum No. 1 Response to Comments Vesting Tentative Map No. 72295 Willow Heights Final Environmental Impact Report "Site D" Specific Plan SCH No. 2008021014 Lead Agency: City of Diamond Bar Community Development Department 21810 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, California 91765-4178 Applicant: Lennar Homes of California, Inc. 25 Enterprise, Suite 300 Aliso Viejo, California 92656 Prepared by: Environmental Impact Sciences 26051 Via Concha Mission Viejo, California 92691-5416 November 2013 "Site D" Specific Plan City of Diamond Bar, California Table of Contents List of Sections Section Paqe 1.0 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................1 2.0 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD REGARDING CHANNEL MODIFICATIONS .....................2 2.1 Site D Specific Plan.............................................................................................2 2.2 Final Environmental Impact Report......................................................................2 2.3 Addendum...........................................................................................................5 3.0 LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS....................................8 4.0 AIR RIGHTS FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES.........................................................................9 5.0 UNDERGROUNDING OF PUBLIC FACILITIES..............................................................9 6.0 CEQA COMPLIANCE....................................................................................................10 List of Figures Figure ARTC-1 Conceptual Alternative Drainage Plan...........................................................................6 ARTC-2 Standard Design Plan for a Double Box Culvert............................................................7 List of Attachments Attachment A Flood Permit Application B County Permit Policies C County Guidelines for Overbuilding and Air Rights D Urban Freeway Cap Parks Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 November 2013 Addendum No. 1 — Response to Comments Page i "Site D" Specific Plan City of Diamond Bar, California 1.0 INTRODUCTION At its meeting on November 19, 2013, with regards to Agenda Item No. 7.1 (Resolution No. 2013- 34: Approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295, Associated Development Review and Tree Permit Applications, and Addendum #1 to the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Site D Specific Plan [Planning Case No. PL2013-229] to Authorize the Development of 182 Residential Units and a 2.5 Net -Acre Neighborhood Public Park at the Southeasterly Corner of Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard, Diamond Bar, CA 91765, et al.), the City of Diamond Bar (City or Lead Agency) City Council (Council) voted to continue the agenda item to December 3, 2013 in order to give City staff an opportunity to provide more information about the "feasibility" of covering that segment of the Brea Canyon Flood Control Channel (Channel) located within the "Site D" study area.' The project modification posited by the Council is addressed herein both in the context of "covering" (i.e., building a cover over or overbuild) and "undergrounding" (i.e., replacing the existing open channel with a subsurface conduit). If it should so elect, the Council possesses the discretionary authority to condition Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295 (VTT 72295) in the manner it deems appropriate. Here, the condition under consideration is the imposition of a project -specific obligation to cover the Channel or to replace the existing open culvert with an underground pipeline. From an entitlement perspective, the imposition of that condition on VTT 72295 (should it be so imposed) alters the proposed project in a physical way and, in so doing, potentially changes the project description and environmental analysis presented in the "Final Environmental Impact Report — `Site D' Specific Plan, SCH No. 2008021014" (FEIR)z and in the "Addendum No. 1 to the Final Environmental Impact Report — `Site D' Specific Plan, SCH No. 2008021014" (City of Diamond Bar, September 2013) (Addendum). This "Addendum — Response to Comments" (Addendum RTC) examines the environmental and other implications of that action and presents the Community Development Department's (Department) preliminary assessment whether that condition results in any significant impacts to the natural and human environment and can be accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable time period.3 In processing VTT 72295 and in its consideration of the subdivision of the "Site D" planning area, the City has elected to defer review of the final park plan until a later date. As illustrated in VTT 72295, two separate lots would be created which collectively comprise the entirety of the neighborhood park. The Channel bifurcates the proposed neighborhood park area, separating the 0.9 -acre "park" located to the west of and the 3.8 -acre "rain garden park/basin" located to the east of the Channel. As such, the Council retains the option to act on this item either as an integral part of VTT 72295 or, subject to the imposition of specified performance standards, to defer any action thereupon until the detailed park plan is brought back for the Council's consideration.4 1/ The project site is located in the Diamond Bar Creek watershed which constitutes a portion of the San Jose Creek subwatershed of the San Gabriel River watershed. 2/ The FEIR included, but was not limited to, the "Draft Environmental Impact Report —'Site D" Specific Plan, SCH No. 2008021014" (DEIR) and the "Response to Comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report —'Site D' Specific Plan, SCH No. 2008021014." 3/ As defined in the State CEQA Guidelines, "feasible" is defined to mean "capable of being accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable period of time, taking into account economic, environmental, legal, social, and technological factors" (14 CCR 15364). 4/ Section 15300 et seq. of the State CEQA Guidelines identifies certain "classes" of projects as being categorically exempt, acknowledging that those projects "do not have a significant effect on the environment and they are declared to be categorically exempt from the requirements for the preparation of environmental documents." Pursuant to Section 15302 therein, "Class 2 consists of replacement or reconstruction of existing structures and facilities Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 November 2013 Addendum No. 1 — Response to Comments Page 1 "Site D" Specific Plan City of Diamond Bar, California With regards to the Channel, based on the information presented in the Applicant's tentative subdivision map, assuming a 50 -foot width and a maximum length of 565 -foot length, the area now under consideration for possible coverage or undergrounding equates to about 0.65 acres (28,250 square feet). Alternatively, the DEIR assumed that the LACFCD's real property interests within the "Site D" planning area totaled about 0.75 acres. Although the actual County acreage and the area of possible Channel coverage may be less, the 0.75 -acre assumption is retained herein. In the event that the County's property were to be added to the area now identified by the Applicant as located within the boundaries of the current conceptual park plan, as potentially envisioned by the proposed condition, the park acreage within the "Site D" planning area might, therefore, increase by up to an additional 0.75 acres.5 Conversely, if the Applicant elects not to increase the size of the park beyond what is now proposed, a reduction in the size and reconfiguration of the two parcels comprising the park site would logically occur. 2.0 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD REGARDING CHANNEL MODIFICATIONS Both the "'Site D' Specific Plan" (SDSP) and the FEIR contain information relevant to the Channel's coverage or replacement with an underground pipeline. Information relevant to the proposed condition, as extracted from those two documents, is presented below. 2.1 Site D Specific Plan The SDSP contains a number of references to the possible coverage of the Channel. As indicated therein: (1) "The SDSP was originally envisioned to be a mixed use project, consisting of half of the site planned for a shopping center with frontages along Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard (and covering the channel), and the other half planned for up to 202 dwelling units" (p. 3); (2) "The Los Angeles County Flood Control District owns the channel separating the City and School District properties. The channel will most likely not be covered, but there may be an opportunity for it to be integrated into the trail system along Brea Canyon Road to the north and south, as well as connect to the walking trails within the project site" (p. 3); and (3) "The Brea Canyon Channel which runs through a small portion of the site may be covered as part of the development and will be available for parking and landscape uses only" (p. 26). The Channel's coverage was contemplated in the SDSP; however, the SDSP neither mandated the Channel's coverage nor precluded that action as a possible project component. 2.2 Final Environmental Impact Report The possible coverage of that portion of the Channel located within the "Site D" property, identified as Los Angeles County Private Drain No. 395 (PD 395), was examined in the FEIR, of which the where the new structure will be located on the same site as the structure replaced and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity as the structure replaced." Reference to the above cited statutory provision is not intended to indicate the City's ability to avail itself of that option but to indicate that the State Legislature has determined that certain "replacement and reconstruction" activities do not have the potential to produce significant environmental effects. 5/ Neither the FEIR nor the Addendum explicitly addressed the additional park acreage resulting from the coverage or undergrounding of the existing Channel. The FEIR did, however, assume the inclusion of and the modification of the Channel for the purpose of CEQA compliance. Absence specificity as to the precise nature of park improvements, from a broad environmental perspective, the expansion of park facilities would appear to have minimal environmental effects. When final park improvement plans are brought back for the Council's consideration, additional environmental review may be required in order to ensure that the nature of the proposed improvements and on-site amenities do not introduce new significant effects not previously considered by the Lead Agency. Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 November 2013 Addendum No. 1 — Response to Comments Page 2 "Site D" Specific Plan City of Diamond Bar, California "Draft Environmental Impact Report —'Site D' Specific Plan, SCH No. 2008021014" (DEIR) was a part. The following excerpts are extracted from the DEIR. As initially formulated, the "Site D" project was a mixed-use development involving both commercial and residential uses. Under the initial design concept, the Channel was to be covered and the area located there above used for parking and site access. As indicated and illustrated in the DEIR (p. 2-7; Figure 2-7, p. 2-16): As illustrated in Figure 2-7 ("Site D" Specific Plan - Conceptual Drainage Plan), the existing Brea Canyon Storm Drain Channel will be covered and become an underground drainage facility as it traverses the project site. To convey the 50 -year discharge, the proposed channel section will be 9 - feet wide by 8 -feet wide, double cell, reinforced concrete box (RCB) with an average cover of 20 feet. Fifty feet of transition box will be constructed from the proposed RCB section to the existing culvert section under Diamond Bar Boulevard. A transition structure downstream of the proposed RCB will be constructed to join the existing trapezoidal channel. That graphic is included as Figure ARTC-1 (Conceptual Alternative Drainage Plan) herein. With regards to discretionary permit, the DEIR (p. 2-22) stated that: [T]he project involves both the acceptance of the design and construction of the on-site storm drain system by the LACDPW [Los Angeles County Department of Public Works] and, through the conveyance of a leasehold interest, the LACDPW's authorization allowing the overbuilding (covering), air rights transference, and use of lands atop the Brea Canyon Storm Drain Channel for project -related purposes. With regards to conveyance of "air rights" above the Channel, the DEIR (p. ES -1) noted: The Brea Canyon Storm Drain Channel (Brea Canyon Channel), which runs generally parallel to Brea Canyon Road, separates the District Property from the City Property. The LACFCD's approximately 0.75 -acre facility (County Property) is presently an open box culvert. In accordance with the LACFCD's "Guidelines for Overbuilding and Air Rights," in combination with such other standards and procedures as may be established by the County, leasehold interests in the "air rights" above the channel could be conveyed to a non -County entity, thus allowing the channel to be covered and the lands situated above that facility used for other purposes. With regards to the LACDPW, the DEIR (p. 4.4-6) noted: The Brea Canyon Storm Drain Channel, which traverses the project site, is under the jurisdiction of the Los Angeles County Flood Control District (District), a division of the LACDPW. The County has developed "guidelines" for uses of the District's rights-of-way by other parties for "overbuilding open channels and covering storm drains to create surface Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 November 2013 Addendum No. 1 — Response to Comments Page 3 "Site D" Specific Plan City of Diamond Bar, California areas, to identify and resolve areas of incompatibility, and to provide the basic requirements for specific proposals that will maximize the long-range benefits to the public and the District."' As indicated therein, for operating rights-of-way, overbuilding will be allowed provided the District's needs for flood control and all existing foreign uses authorized by the District are protected or provided for. Proposed uses must accommodate recreational, utility, transportation, public housing, and open space requirements that are programmed for the channel in question.' County guidelines indicate that, in order to optimize safety and ensure the hydraulic and structural integrity of a particular flood control channel, the District and the ACOE [United States Army Corps of Engineers] have a number of operational requirements that must be met by every joint -use proposal. Those requirements include, but may not be limited to, the following: (1) Access into a covered channel is required every 500 feet; this access is usually of a pedestrian nature and could be in the form of manholes and ladders; (2) Adequate clearance inside the channel (a minimum height of channel wall) must be maintained throughout the channel for the transportation of heavy equipment used in channel repair, bridge, and bridge abutment repair; and (3) In the event the channel is covered, adequate ventilation must be provided to prevent the build-up of noxious or volatile fumes; a short reach of the channel shall remain uncovered, thereby aiding channel maintenance and repair.3 Footnotes (Note footnote numbering is altered herein from the original): 1. Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, Los Angeles County Flood Control District, Guidelines for Overbuilding and Air Rights, revised June 2004, p. 2. 2. The District is developing a Property Use Plan (PUP) for each major flood control channel to ensure that the channel rights-of-way are developed in a manner compatible with the adjoining properties and yield the maximum benefit to the local community. Proposals should be in conformance with the PUP; however, if a desired use is different, the project proponent will be required to submit a change (amendment) to the PUP for approval. An amendment may be acceptable, provided the change for a particular reach of channel is between successive streets and approved by the local planning agency. In addition, all environmental requirements need to be fulfilled to the satisfaction of the Lead Agency. 3. Ibid. [Op Cit.], pp. 6-7. If the Channel were to covered, the DER (p. 4.4-17) identified the following "condition of approval" (Condition of Approval 4-1, renumbered 4-2 in the FEIR) relating to that action: If the flood control channel right-of-way is to be utilized as part of the project's development plan, prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall obtain all requisite permits and approvals from the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works — Flood Control District allowing for the overbuilding of the Brea Canyon Storm Drain Channel and shall provide the City Engineer with documentation, acceptable to the City Engineer, demonstrating County approval and authorization, including a complete list of all permit requirements that may be associated therewith. Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 November 2013 Addendum No. 1 — Response to Comments Page 4 "Site D" Specific Plan City of Diamond Bar, California A project -specific hydrology study, examining coverage of the Channel, was included in Appendix E (Preliminary Hydrology and Water Quality Analysis') of the DER. As indicated, in part, therein: According to the record plans for Brea Canyon Channel (LACDPW private drain No. 395), 25 -year discharge of 2,285 cfs [cubic feet per second] is shown at downstream side of Diamond Bar Boulevard culvert. LACDPW has requested the improvements shall be designed to meet 50 -year storm runoff which is converted to 2,602 cfs. Again, for direct summation of two flows from the site and from the Channel, the 50 -year discharge is calculated as 2,777 cfs at this reach ... The proposed grading plan indicates that the existing Brea Canyon Channel at this reach will be replaced with reinforced concrete box (RCB) and the area created will be used for parking or landscaping. An existing tributary open channel east of project will be replaced with RCB as well for a proposed entrance to the site. To convey the 50 -year discharge, proposed channel section shall be double cells 9 feet wide by 8 feet high RCB with average 20 feet cover based on the proposed grading plan. 50 feet of transition box will be constructed from proposed RCB section to existing culvert section under Diamond Bar Boulevard. The County's "standard" design plan for a double reinforced concrete box (RCB) culvert was presented in the DER and is included herein as Figure ARTC-2 (Standard Design Plan for a Double Box Culvert). Other design options (e.g., circular pipe, pipe -arch, arch) and characteristics (e.g., flexible, semi -flexible, or rigid structures) may exist but were neither included nor discussed therein. Because the existing Channel's capacity is less than the existing 50 -year storm flow, even absent any increased flows associated with the proposed project, improvements to that segment of the Channel may be required (by others). As a result, the FEIR included the following mitigation measure (Mitigation Measure 4-1)': Prior to the issuance of grading permits, all drainage facilities and improvements shall be subject to final design and engineering review and approval by the City Engineer and, for those storm drain facilities under County jurisdiction, by the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW). 2.3 Addendum With the exception of the proposed pedestrian and service vehicle -only bridge constructed across the Channel and physically connecting the "park" and "rain garden/basin," the Addendum contains no additional information or analysis (beyond that presented in the FEIR) relating to the further coverage of the Channel and the environmental impacts resulting therefrom. 6/ PENCO Engineering, Inc., Preliminary Drainage Report for Site 'D' Improvements at Intersection of Diamond Bar Boulevard and Brea Canyon Road, Diamond Bar, California, February 7, 2008, revised April 6, 2009. '/ That mitigation measure is inclusive of the currently proposed bridge crossing the Channel and connecting the "park" and "rain garden/basin" and, if the project were to be modified to include the Channel's coverage, would include the Channel improvements identified herein. Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 November 2013 Addendum No. 1 — Response to Comments Page 5 "Site D" Specific Plan City of Diamond Bar, California PIPE CL PROP. Ur ROPE TO JOIN EX. P1Jy'UERf - \ PROP JOM EI TO %jjjjjj TC JOINIFYRANS OjSFRET UC� BAEq CANYpv AOgD, BHEA CANYON CHANNEL = \t EX. TRAPEZOIDAL �TRANSITION� i DOU91 CHANNEL FROM TRAPEZOID L �/� -��'` Al a' BOTTOM WIDTH TO DOBLE CELLS. 1.5:1 SIDE SLOPE BOB 8' HIGH ✓ \ FINISH€0 GRADE 'ROP. CONNECTION 14 - STORM DRAIN FROM J PROJECT (48' RCP) 413.27' ` CELLS 9'(W) BY $(H) RCB ACE COVER - 20 FEET a � o LGRAPHIC SCALE 50 D 50 ( IN FEET 1 inch 50 ft. � EX. DOUBLE CELL r7 8' BY 8' RCB = \ ---- --� 50' \ v� RANS171DN —RCB Figure ARTC-1 CONCEPTUAL ALTERNATIVE DRAINAGE PLAN Source: PENCO Engineering, Inc. Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 November 2013 Addendum No. 1 — Response to Comments Page 7 "Site D" Specific Plan City of Diamond Bar, California IT W a See Nate 5 spacl g SPan "g" bars S�� NumDar "f" Dor j ROOF SECTION SPANS 4'THRU 8' q INVERT SIMILAR / 1 :1� e" bars, sea Note $ See Nate 6� Alternative Const Jt� Canat Jt--, EXTERIOR WALL SECTION SPANS 4' THRU 8' "g" hers q 2" Cir TYP L+ (ap+iana"f"^ oars R4 T RCB �----�^M:: in fill®+ bar — 0.25 5 #44 "tl" 00 8 0.25x4- 5 #4 '16, For 'M4 1-- We Is, -C" w4 C m 10e le Max m 16 Ma et4 0 YPc. Al+erne+l 3see Confit Jt� Nat- 4 ontl 3 Invert Elev Sinn a. d9.1 ra'a—,bars T2 SPan, 5 TYPICAL SECTION SPANS 4' THRU S' r F-a— hateZ" CIr TYP "0" bora b" ba YS � �q" Min fillet a"bars C.25 5 14 "d" bars or 0.25 5 ��mm��m�mm��mm�sel��mm��mm�mml�ml�l��mm�m�mmml� a4 0 1e, far cover over 1D' -O" 114 0 18 Me. 9" bars See Nate 5 �f�i�ii➢®®®F�®®®®®i�Fi�li�m®1f9®�®�®I�®ice®mmmmmm®�®�®mmmfl� 18Maxc Const JT AlternativeConst L11-1 �mmmmmammmmm®®®[�[r�m��mor�mmam�l�mmm�m®gym®mm��» Cans,Jte, o" bars Slope 46:1 ®tiYBlY�m®f}�®�t�ei�R�mom m =10111M ts�mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmli�mmmm�mmmmmmmf�mmmmmmmmmmm ®E Immmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmlm mlmmm ��mmm0®©mml3imHimmaEYiRICi�mt3ill31m©®®mm®mmmmmm®mmm®m Om m ®�mmmmt�mmmm®IDm®mOF�immf�i�m�Q:lm�mmm0�mmm�lEli�E�m13�L3imm Imo®' SEE EM®' Im ��4YYf�®�®��IYCI�®�®�®®®®r! �mm 3-00 wY/rslie'e[IY.�®�®IY'M�W[f®®WN®filtl __®mm�®®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmlE3l��Omm 1=1121 ®' �mm0®mm®m®m®�®�®®®mm0©®®m� MIZIMMIMMIZIMMMMMIM : • OmmmmmmmOmm EMClC��®fm�m®im��fm�mm a See Nate 5 spacl g SPan "g" bars S�� NumDar "f" Dor j ROOF SECTION SPANS 4'THRU 8' q INVERT SIMILAR / 1 :1� e" bars, sea Note $ See Nate 6� Alternative Const Jt� Canat Jt--, EXTERIOR WALL SECTION SPANS 4' THRU 8' "g" hers q 2" Cir TYP L+ (ap+iana"f"^ oars R4 T RCB �----�^M:: in fill®+ bar — 0.25 5 #44 "tl" 00 8 0.25x4- 5 #4 '16, For 'M4 1-- We Is, -C" w4 C m 10e le Max m 16 Ma et4 0 YPc. Al+erne+l 3see Confit Jt� Nat- 4 ontl 3 Invert Elev Sinn a. d9.1 ra'a—,bars T2 SPan, 5 TYPICAL SECTION SPANS 4' THRU S' r F-a— hateZ" CIr TYP "0" bora "g" bora f' bars TYPICAL SECTION SPANS 10'THRU 14' AC I T, NOTES: I royami Cdaavrmale.:a>¢mw/»,wmr®.:w 1. For boxes with span or height less thou alts ofthose slw.wn In Table, sae next greater ST. box concrete dim_fcna and reinforcement. Make neceesarY changes In bar Isagths and quantitle6. 2. Far bases with soon ar height or cover greeter +hon t— shown in tables, a special design is re¢11red. 3. 0—titles are alap—1 oto and far design purposes only. 4. It 15 permiaa ihle fa eliminate the 'so. -dad on every ether "e" bar. 5. " bars are 1 half µpacing. rov 6. Pide paving —ah oton hen too ie expo -ed ma when poveme.I is portland cement concrete, and adjust quantities. 7. Far design and details not shown, see Sicnaord Plan DB2. 6. This plan sheet may be MeW for mul+iple call cuirerts by mak ng necessary adjustments. Q RLO Invert Fl- FLAT INVERT ALTERNATIVE Spavin Spa in "b" bars i — "f" ar "e" bars _ INVERT SIMILAR 6" a" bars "P" bars Sea Note 6 Epac ROOF SECTION J 1.i m SPANS 1 0' THRU 14' "b" bora nF u a" cors m bars, See Note E 'e" } EXTERIOR WALL SECTION SPANS 10' THRU 14' STATE OF CALIFORNIA pEPARiMENT DF TRANEPORTATisN CAST -IN-PLACE REINFORCED CONCRETE DOUBLE BOX CULVERT NO SCALE Figure ARTC-2 STANDARD DESIGN PLAN FOR A DOUBLE BOX CULVER Source: Los Angeles County Department of Public Works Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 November 2013 Addendum No. 1 — Response to Comments Page 8 b" ba YS � �q" Min fillet a"bars C.25 5 14 "d" bars or 0.25 5 -�-� a4 0 1e, far cover over 1D' -O" 114 0 18 Me. 9" bars See Nate 5 18Maxc Const JT AlternativeConst L11-1 J Cans,Jte, o" bars Slope 46:1 "g" bora f' bars TYPICAL SECTION SPANS 10'THRU 14' AC I T, NOTES: I royami Cdaavrmale.:a>¢mw/»,wmr®.:w 1. For boxes with span or height less thou alts ofthose slw.wn In Table, sae next greater ST. box concrete dim_fcna and reinforcement. Make neceesarY changes In bar Isagths and quantitle6. 2. Far bases with soon ar height or cover greeter +hon t— shown in tables, a special design is re¢11red. 3. 0—titles are alap—1 oto and far design purposes only. 4. It 15 permiaa ihle fa eliminate the 'so. -dad on every ether "e" bar. 5. " bars are 1 half µpacing. rov 6. Pide paving —ah oton hen too ie expo -ed ma when poveme.I is portland cement concrete, and adjust quantities. 7. Far design and details not shown, see Sicnaord Plan DB2. 6. This plan sheet may be MeW for mul+iple call cuirerts by mak ng necessary adjustments. Q RLO Invert Fl- FLAT INVERT ALTERNATIVE Spavin Spa in "b" bars i — "f" ar "e" bars _ INVERT SIMILAR 6" a" bars "P" bars Sea Note 6 Epac ROOF SECTION J 1.i m SPANS 1 0' THRU 14' "b" bora nF u a" cors m bars, See Note E 'e" } EXTERIOR WALL SECTION SPANS 10' THRU 14' STATE OF CALIFORNIA pEPARiMENT DF TRANEPORTATisN CAST -IN-PLACE REINFORCED CONCRETE DOUBLE BOX CULVERT NO SCALE Figure ARTC-2 STANDARD DESIGN PLAN FOR A DOUBLE BOX CULVER Source: Los Angeles County Department of Public Works Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 November 2013 Addendum No. 1 — Response to Comments Page 8 "Site D" Specific Plan City of Diamond Bar, California The Applicant's current development plan does not assume the Channel's coverage. Some modification of that plan would, therefore, be required in order to implement that condition. Changes could include, but may not be limited to, revisions to: (1) the conceptual park plan; (2) the proposed grading plan; and (3) the proposed drainage improvement plans. Although it can reasonably be assumed that any resulting changes would be relatively minor, the City should await receipt of additional information from the Applicant prior to any determination concerning the nature of those changes and their potential environmental significance. 3.0 LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS A permit from the LACDPW is required in order to build over an existing storm drain or within a flood control easement. A permit application, including plans and structural calculations indicating that the proposed improvements would neither detrimentally affect the storm drain system nor its maintenance, must be submitted to the LACDPW's Construction Division — Permits and Subdivisions Section (900 South Fremont Avenue, 8th Floor, Alhambra, CA 91803-1331). The permit application package is included in Attachment A (Flood Permit Application). County permit policies regarding work within flood control facilities are presented in Attachment B (County Permit Policies). As specified therein, construction work affecting channel capacity is prohibited between October 15 and April 15. That prohibition, in combination with the additional time period required to obtain a County permit, could affect the Applicant's development schedule. The LACFCD has formulated "guidelines" for "overbuilding and air rights." The LACFCD's "Guidelines for Overbuilding and Air Rights" (Revised June 2004) are included as Attachment C (County Guidelines for Overbuilding and Air Rights) herein. In accordance therewith, the LACFCD will allow overbuilding and use of air rights by a long-term lease over fee -owned property. Lease documents shall contain requirements protecting the County's interests and include provisions for receipt of rental income. Proposed uses must accommodate recreational, utility, transportation, public housing, and open space requirements that may be programmed for the affected channel. As specified, in part, therein: To optimize safety and ensure the hydraulic and structural integrity of a particular flood control channel, the [Los Angeles County Flood Control] District and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers have a number of operational requirements that must be met by every joint use proposal. The following is a list of the major requirements. Please note that this list should not be considered complete or absolute. The requirements are: (1) Access into a covered channel is required every 500 feet. This access is usually of a pedestrian nature and could be in the form of manholes, ladders, etc. (2) Adequate clearances inside the channel (a minimum height of channel wall) must be maintained throughout the channel for the transportation of heavy equipment used in channel repair, bridge, and bridge abutment repair, etc. (3) In the event the channel is to be covered, adequate ventilation must be provided to prevent the build-up of noxious or volatile fumes. A short reach of the channel, 30 feet or so, to remain uncovered, thereby aiding channel maintenance and repair in that equipment and material could be lowered into or removed from the channel. Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 November 2013 Addendum No. 1 — Response to Comments Page 8 "Site D" Specific Plan City of Diamond Bar, California The City is unaware of the existence of any "Property Use Plan" (PUP) which may have been formulated by the LACFCD for either the entirety of the San Gabriel River or for that segment of Diamond Bar Creek in the vicinity of the Channel. If a PUP has been developed, that document may include provisions relating to authorized and prohibited land uses atop the Channel. 4.0 AIR RIGHTS FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES The rights to lands above and below the ground are separable from surface rights. As indicated in the Tax Code: "A change in ownership of real property occurs pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code section 60 upon the transfer of air rights located directly above the land surface which establishes their legal description. Air rights are considered real property by Property Tax Rule 124, which classifies them as land; a transfer of a present fee interest in air rights separate from the surface rights is legally possible since such rights are real property and part of land; and there should be a reappraisal of that portion of the land (air rights) that changes ownership." Although in a scale substantially larger than now under consideration by the City, as indicated in Attachment D (Urban Freeway Cap Parks), the County is currently considering a number of proposals to construct public parks (identified as cap parks, highway parks, and deck parks) above existing freeway rights-of-way. Nationally, examples are cited where such facilities have already been successfully developed. Similarly, throughout the County, there are many examples of public use of flood control facilities. As indicated in the "Los Angeles River Master Plan" (Los Angeles County, June 1996): "While the primary purpose of the Los Angeles River is to provide flood protection for existing and anticipated land uses in the Los Angeles Basin, decreasing open space resources has led to renewed interest by the Citizens of Los Angeles County in exploring opportunities for the Los Angeles River to support compatible and multiple uses" (Section VII, p. 2-1). As in the case of the Los Angeles River, based on the specific facility, adaptive public use many not necessitate coverage or undergrounding. That option (i.e., expanded public use without coverage or undergrounding) does not, however, appear available with regards to the Channel based on the physical constraints imposed by the site and other proximal land uses. The proposed project modification would necessitate three -party negotiations (Applicant, City, and County), including consideration of construction, maintenance, and other costs, tenure, fee payments, and, with regards to decking, obligations for the possible repair and removal. Although it would appear that a leasehold interest represents the appropriate legal instrument to establish a multiple use, a leasehold might include an expiration when the City could be mandated to vacate its interests and cease its use. Subject to the recommendations of the City Attorney, a public -use easement might allow for the creation of a long-term public use absent a definitive tenure. 5.0 UNDERGROUNDING OF PUBLIC FACILITIES Currently, the Channel is a trapezoidal concrete -lined open drainage facility. Under Diamond Bar Boulevard, a double 8 -foot by 8 -foot RCB serves as roadway culvert. In contrast, the proposed project modification assumes a double 9 -feet by 8 -feet RCB. The FEIR notes that "50 feet of transition box will be constructed from [the] proposed RCB section to [the] existing culvert section under Diamond Bar Boulevard." No off-site improvements to the existing Channel were identified in the FEIR. Construction activities associated with Channel modifications in proximity to Diamond Bar Boulevard might, however, necessitate temporary lane closures. Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 November 2013 Addendum No. 1 — Response to Comments Page 9 "Site D" Specific Plan City of Diamond Bar, California In addition to new County permit requirements, because the proposed modification will directly impact Diamond Bar Creek, new or altered permit obligations which are not presently a part of the proposed project would be created with the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region (LARWQCB) (Section 401 water quality certification), California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) (Section 1602 streambed alteration agreement), and United States Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) (Section 404 permit). Any permit activities that may already be underway with those agencies would likely need to be modified based on the additional impacts resulting from the proposed storm drain improvements. Any new or altered permit requirements could result in a delay in project commencement. 6.0 CEQA COMPLIANCE As now proposed, the Applicant seeks to retain the open Channel; therefore, modifications to the Channel associated with VTT 72295 would be minimal (e.g., an existing tributary open channel located within the "Site D" planning area and to the east of Channel will be replaced with a RCB). Conversely, if covered, the existing open Channel would need to be removed, concrete and other materials removed from the site, grading in the vicinity of the channel would increase, a double RCB culvert (or alternative design) would need to be installed, and sufficient ground cover laid atop the subsurface facility. In order to provide adequate depth of soil atop the channel for landscaping, the Applicant's grading plans in the vicinity of the Channel and the proposed neighborhood park would likely need to be altered from the plans now before the Council. If retained as an open Channel, only minimal modifications to that facility would be required; however, if that facility were to be covered or replaced with an underground culvert (either by the Applicant or by others), additional engineering analysis would be required by the LACDPW. Because placing a deck above or placing a lid on the existing Channel could become flow constraining and could adversely affect upstream conditions, the County would likely impose additional design requirements relative to the nature of any associated on-site improvements. In addition, recognizing that storm drain systems constitute an interrelated network, requirements for additional off-site improvements (which are now not a part of the proposed project) could be imposed by the County for adjoining segments. Under both coverage options, the project's infrastructure improvement costs would increase and the project's effectuation could be delayed while detailed hydrology studies and engineering drawings are under review by the LACDPW and as a result of further permit review by the LARWQCB, CDFG and ACOE. To the extent that the information produced by those studies, infrastructure improvements, and permit obligations were to introduce significant new information, additional CEQA review would likely be required. With regards to the proposed condition, insufficient information is presently available to conduct an environmental assessment of the potential impacts associated with the coverage of the Channel. Similarly, because the inclusion of that condition has the potential to alter the design and development of VTT 72295 (e.g., revisions to the conceptual park, proposed grading, and proposed drainage improvement plans), it is not known to what extent the Addendum would need to be altered and/or whether the Addendum would continue to suffice as the appropriate manner of CEQA compliance. Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 November 2013 Addendum No. 1 — Response to Comments Page 10 Attachment A Flood Permit Application �y1�GEi�S 01 u� .o PUBLIC WUf KU G6r`s�hlce jp'��o LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 900 S. FREMONT AVE. ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91803-1331 TRACKING NO. FLOOD PERMIT APPLICATION DATERECEIVED: OWNER/ APPLICANT: TELEPHONE: ADDRESS: Street AGENT/ CONTACT: ADDRESS: E-MAIL City TELEPHONE: Zip Code Street City Zip Code SITE ADDRESS: Street City Zip Code NEAREST INTERSECTION: THOMAS GUIDE: SCOPE OF WORK: PERSON/AGENCY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE PROPOSED FACILITY: PHONE: ( ) The undersigned certifies that the applicant for this permit is familiar with the requirements of the County Lobbyist Ordinance (Los Angeles County Code Chapter 2.160), and that all persons acting on behalf of the applicant have complied with and will continue to comply with this ordinance throughout the application process. It is further agreed that the Owner/Applicant is the financially responsible party for all fees, deposits, charges, collections and refunds, regardless if payment is made by others Print Name of Owner/Applicant Signature of Owner/Applicant Date Submittal Requirements: 1. Four sets of final construction plans (seven if the Corps is involved) with structural details and profiles of the existing and proposed facilities. 2. Two sets of letter size structural and/or hydraulic and hydrology calculations. The plans and calculations must be stamped and signed by a registered civil/structural engineer licensed to practice in the State of California. 3. Four copies of the As -Built drawings of the District's facility impacted by the proposed work and two of the right-of-way map. 4. Letter from Owner/Applicant authorizing Agent/Contact to request a permit on their behalf. 5. For storm drain connections, complete EXHIBIT "A" when applicable, and submit SUSMP. 6. Fees will be charged according to the current ordinance established by the Board of Supervisors 7. Certificate of Liability Insurance ($1 Million minimum coverage) and additional insured endorsement naming the County of Los Angeles, the Los Angeles County Flood Control District, and, when applicable, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as co-insured. 8. Complete and sign acknowledgement that Applicant has read, understands, and agrees to fully comply with the Best Management Practices (BMP) Attachment to this permit per Los Angeles County Code Chapter 12.80 Stormwater and Runoff Pollution Control. The applicant must show that the proposed work will not adversely affect the District's interests; i.e., (1) Hydraulic and Hydrologic Design; (2) Structural integrity; (3) Maintenance standards; (4) District's property rights, etc. PAYMENT Issuance Fee: $ Plan Check: $ Inspection: $ Other: $ Total: $ TYPE torm rain onnectior atch asin Relocation u Lbatch asin Modification INFO Stream/Project FOR DISTRICT USE ONLY RECEIVED BY: ASSIGNED TO: Project No. (Fee or AC) Project No. (Fee or AC) Project No. (Fee or AC) Project No. and apin 1 u ajor odifications inor odificationsu File Code Suc inerued RU tin MDLtw ES-M;.ES M[ CE,11111 RD�u PM DD QED uW L6�MER� MD KOad nit UOtheru Uoverbtddu triilidtgy�rossingu PD/MTD (To be Transferred) Tract/P.M. No. P:\Idpub\Permits\Flood Unit\Flood Permit Application APPROVED BY MA 11-2011 NO -u P.O. # 1 OF 2 FOR DISTRICT USE ONLY (Preliminary Check) General ❑ Incomplete packages are NOT accepted ❑ Plan Check and Inspection fees included ❑ Vicinity Map ❑ Affected facility (i.e. MTD, RDD, & etc.) has been transferred to the District for maintenance General Engineering Requirements ❑ Two sets of calculations and/or reports stamped and signed by a Civil/Structural/Geotechnical Engineer ❑ Four sets of plans (seven for Army Corp facilities) signed and stamped by a Civil/Structural/Geotechnical Engineer ❑ Four copies of District's facility "As -Built" drawings that are affected by the proposed work ❑ Name of affected District facility shown on the plans for the proposed work ❑ Plan, Profiles, Elevations, Sections, and Details for the proposed work Storm Drain Connections ❑ Existing hydraulic and hydrology data of the District's facility impacted by the proposed connection ❑ Obtain the "Allowable Q" from Design Division ❑ Revised Hydraulic calculations taking into account the proposed connection ❑ Water quality agreement signed and notarized (Not always required) ❑ Stationing along LACFCD's storm drain centerline where the proposed connection is located ❑ SUSMP Catch basin relocation ❑ Existing catch basin hydrology and design data included. ❑ Revised catch basin hydrology and design data included. ❑ Connector pipe hydraulics. ❑ Street capacity calculations Crossings over channels ❑ Water surface and pier loss calculations ❑ Structural calculations for the bridge/ utility crossing including surcharges on the District facility ❑ Plan and profile plans Overbuilds ❑ Right-of-way letter of approval from the underlying fee owner ❑ Two copies of the structural calculations for added surcharges on the District facility ❑ Two copies of the right-of-way map ❑ Two copies of the easement documents (if LACFCD is not the underlying fee owner) Utility Crossings Under -crossing ❑ Plan and profile of proposed utility showing the District storm drain ❑ Method of support and structural calculations ❑ Two copies of right-of-way map and four copies of the "as built" Over -crossing ❑ Plan and profile of proposed utility showing the District storm drain ❑ Two copies of right-of-way map and four copies of the "as built" ❑ Structural calculations for added surcharges on the District facility Temporary Use Short Term Use (less than a year) ❑ Liability Insurance ($1,000,000 minimum coverage) including LACFCD/LACDPW as additionally insured ❑ Plot plan with north arrow and limits of affected areas Long Term Use (more than a year) ❑ Copy of Use Agreement, Recreation Agreement ❑ SDF Plot plan with north arrow and limits of affected areas P:\Idpub\Permits\Flood Unit\Flood Permit Application APPROVED BY MA 11-2011 2 OF 2 SAMPLE AUTHORIZATION LETTER (Authorizing Company/Party Letterhead) Date: Los Angeles County DPW Land Development Division 900 South Fremont Ave, 8th FL Alhambra, CA 91803 LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION Please be advised that (Owner/Applicant name or company name) authorizes (Individual name of/or company name) to act as an agent on my (our) behalf in all matters related to obtaining a(n) (permit type) permit. Our Agent is designated and responsible for the following: ❑ Deliver our payment for fees and deposits ONLY. ❑ Provide payment of fees and deposits ONLY. ❑ Other: I(we) further understand and agree that I(we) shall remain responsible for all permit conditions, permit provisions, fees, deposits, refunds, additional charges and collections resulting from permit application processing, permit issuance and inspection of work. (Signature) (Print) Customer Name: Full Company Address: Email Address: Phone Number: Fax Number: P:\Idpub\Pernuts\Forms\Authorization\third-party-auth-form sample -approved by MA 11-14-201 Ldoc LIABILITY INSURANCE: The Permittee shall furnish the Agency a certificate of liability insurance with the Agency named as certificate holder and a copy of the Additional Insured Endorsement to the general liability insurance of the permittee's contractor. Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy or any subsequent endorsement attached thereto, the Agency shall be named as an additional insured covering the work, whether liability is attributable to the Permittee or the Agency. 1. The Permittee may file insurance acceptable to the Agency covering more than one permit. The coverage shall provide the following minimum limits: Bodily Injury ........... $ 250,000 each person $ 500,000 each occurrence $ 500,000 aggregate products and completed operations Property Damage ....... $ 100,000 each occurrence $ 250,000 aggregate 2. A combined single limit policy with aggregate limits in the amount of $ 1,000,000 will be considered equivalent to the required minimum limits. All liability insurance policies shall bear an endorsement or shall have attached rider whereby it is provided that, in the event of expiration or proposed cancellation of such policies for any reason whatsoever, the Agency shall be notified by mail, giving a sufficient time before the date thereof to comply with any applicable law or statute, but in no event less that 30 days before expiration or cancellation is effective. The Additional Insured Endorsement to the general liability insurance must contain the following language: "The County of Los Angeles and public entity or Special District for which the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors is the Governing Body, and theirAgents, Officers and Employees, shall be Additional insured(s) while acting within the scope of their duties against all claims arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed." P:\Idpub\Permits\Insurance\Insurance - Revised 10-NOV-2011.doc ACORD,. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE (MM/DD/YYYY) PRODUCER INSURANCE BROKER OR COMPANY NAME AND CONTACT INFORMATION, INCLUDING EMAIL ADDRESS THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC # INSURED COMPANY NAME AND CONTACT INFORMATION, INCLUDING A VALID EMAIL ADDRESS INSURERA: POLICY NUMBER INSURERB: POLICY EXPIRATION INSURERC: ATTENTION: INSURER D: GENERAL LIABILITY INSURER E: COVERAGES THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSRDD' LTRINSR ISSUING INSURER SHALL MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO P. O. BOX 1460 POLICY NUMBER POLICYEFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION LIMITS ATTENTION: GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ DAMAGE TO RENTED COMMERCIALGENERAL LIABILITY PREMISES Ea occur.... $ CLAIMS MADE � OCCUR MED EXP (Any one person) $ Sarn SONAL&ADVINJURY $ ERALAGGREGATE $ )I GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: ODUCTS -COMP/OPAGG $ POLICY PRO LOC AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT (Ea accident) $ BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ ALL OWNEDAUTOS SCHEDULEDAUTOS BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ HIRED AUTOS NON -OWNED AUTOS PROPERTYDAMAGE (Per accident) $ GARAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT $ OTHER THAN EA ACC $ ANY AUTO $ AUTOONLY: AGG EXCESS/UMBRELLA LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ OCCUR F—I CLAIMS MADE AGGREGATE $ $ DEDUCTIBLE $ RETENTION $ WORKERS COMPENSATION AND WC STATU- OTH- TORY LIMITS ER. EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? If yes, describe under SPECIAL PROVISIONS below . DISEASE- POLICY LIMIT $ OTHER C1 I DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/EXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT/ SPECIAL PVISIONS Please provide specific details such as project location, type of work, application tracking number, permit number, etc... CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE LAND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION ISSUING INSURER SHALL MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO P. O. BOX 1460 THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. ALHAMBRA, CA 91802-1460 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ATTENTION: ACORD 25 (2001/08) ©ACORD CORPORATION 1988 POLICY NUMBER: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CG 20 12 05 09 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. ADDITIONAL INSURED - STATE OR GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY OR SUBDIVISION OR POLITICAL SUBDIVISION - PERMITS OR AUTHORIZATIONS This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the follov ring: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART SCHEDULE State Or Governmental Agency Or Subdivision Or Politica Subdivision: The County of Los Angeles and public entity or Special District for which the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors is the Governing Body, and their Agents, Officers and Employees, shall be Additional insured(s) while acting within the scope of their duties against all claims arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed. Information required to complete this Schedule, if not shown P iove, will be shown in the Declarations. Section II — Who Is An Insured is amended to in- clude as an insured any state or governmental agency or subdivision or political subdivision shown in the Schedule, subject to the following provisions: 1. This insurance applies only with respect to opera- tions performed by you or on your behalf for which the state or governmental agency or subdivision or political subdivision has issued a permit or au- thorization. .. 2. This insurance does not apply to: a. "Bodily injury", "property damage" or "personal and advertising injury" arising out of operations performed for the federal government, state or municipality; or b. "Bodily injury" or "property damage" included within the "products -completed operations hazard". 0 CG 2012 05 09 © Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2008 Page 1 of 1 13 e�e$ c G 0 z b PUBLIC WORKS Po LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS G yr t f�cservtce Tra�a Acknowledgement Best Management Practices (BMP) Attachment DATE: PERMIT NO. OWNER/APPLICANT: ADDRESS: STREET FAX: ( ) CELL: ( ) PRINT NAME WET SIGNATURE (REQUIRED) CITY EMAIL ADDRESS: PHONE: ( 1 AGENT/CONTACT: PHONE: PRINT NAME WET SIGNATURE (REQUIRED) ADDRESS: ZIP CODE STREET CITY ZIP CODE FAX: ( ) CELL: ( ) EMAIL ADDRESS: hereby acknowledges reading, understanding, and agreeing to comply with the Best Management Practices (BMP) Attachment in accordance with Los Angeles County Code Chapter 12.80 Stormwater and Runoff Pollution Control. SITE ADDRESS: Street City Zip Code NEAREST INTERSECTION: THOMAS GUIDE: PLEASE SUBMIT THIS DOCUMENT WITH THE APPLICATION UPDATED 10-2009 POSTED 11/02/2009 Best Management Practices (BMPs) Attachment The Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW) requires Permittees and their contractors to implement a program to effectively control water pollution during all Permit construction projects. This project shall conform with the requirements of the following County Code and Permits: • Los Angeles, California County Code Chapter 12.80 Stormwater and Runoff Pollution Control • Waste Discharge Requirements for Municipal Storm Water and Urban Runoff Discharges within the County of Los Angeles, and the Incorporated Cities Therein, Except the City of Long Beach (Order No. 01-182, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System [NPDES] No. CAS004001), • NPDES General Permit No. CAS000002, Order No. 99-08-DWQ, Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges of Storm Water Runoff Associated with Construction Activities. The Permittee or Authorized Representative and their contractors shall know and fully comply with the applicable provisions of these permits and Federal, State and local regulations that govern the Permittee or Authorized Representative's operations and the storm water discharges from the project site. In order to ensure a minimum level of water quality control, the Permittee or Authorized Representative and their contractors shall effectively implement and maintain appropriate Best Management Practices (BMPs) shown in Table 1. In addition, the Permittee or Authorized Representative and their contractors shall comply with the following requirements: • Sediments shall not be discharged to the storm drain system or receiving waters. Sediments generated on the construction site shall be retained. • No construction -related materials: waste, spills, or residue shall be discharged from the project site to streets, drainage facilities, receiving waters, or adjacent property by wind or runoff. • Non -storm water runoff from equipment, vehicle washing, or any other activity shall be contained within the project site using appropriate BMPs. • Erosion from slopes and channels shall be prevented. • Minimize grading during the wet season (October 15 through April 15). All erosion susceptible slopes shall be covered, planted, or protected in any way that prevents sediment discharge from the project site. BMPs shall conform to the requirements in the LACDPW Construction Division's "Construction Site Best Management Practices (BMPs) Manual," and addenda thereto issued up to and including, the date of issuance of the Permit for the project. Copies of the Manual are available for purchase from: Los Angeles County Department of Public Works Cashier's Office 900 South Fremont Avenue Alhambra, CA 91803 Telephone (626) 458-6959 Year -Round Implementation Requirements The Permittee or Authorized Representative and their contractors shall have an effective program for implementing, inspecting, and maintaining water pollution control practices for wind erosion control, tracking control, non -storm water control, and waste management and materials pollution control. Soil stabilization and sediment control practices shall be provided throughout the rainy season, defined as between October 15 and April 15, and whenever the National Weather Service predicts rain within 24 hours. The National Weather Service weather forecast shall be monitored and used by the Permittee on a daily basis. The non -rainy season shall be defined as all days outside the defined rainy season. Disturbed soil areas within the project shall be protected in conformance with the requirements in the Construction Site BMP Manual with sediment controls implemented prior to a predicted rain event. Maintenance and Inspection The Permittee or Authorized Representative and their contractors shall be responsible throughout the duration of the project for installing, constructing, inspecting, maintaining, removing and disposing of the BMPs. Unless otherwise directed by LACDPW, the Permittee or Authorized Representative and their contractors are responsible for BMP implementation and maintenance throughout any temporary suspension of work. The Permittee or Authorized Representative shall reimburse LACDPW for the full costs of cleaning or repairing of storm drain, water course, or channel which may be necessary due to ineffective implementation of BMPs. The project site shall be inspected by the Permittee or Authorized Representative or their contractors a minimum of once every week or at least once for projects that last only one week or less. Report of Non -Permitted Discharge and Enforcement If the Permittee or Authorized Representative or their contractors identify any non -permitted discharge into the storm drain system or receiving waters in a manner causing, or potentially causing, a condition of pollution, or if the project receives a written notice or order from any regulatory agency, the Permittee or Authorized Representative or their contractors shall immediately inform LACDPW Construction Division Permits Section by calling the assigned Field Office. The Permittee or Authorized Representative or their contractors shall submit a written report (see attached Notice of Non -Permitted Discharge) to the LACDPW within 5 days of the discharge event, notice or order. The Permittee or Authorized Representative and their contractors are subject to enforcement action by Chapter 12.80 of the Los Angeles County Code that states, "Any person, firm, corporation, municipality or district or any officer or agent of any firm, corporation, municipality or district violating any provision of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. Such violation shall be punishable by a fine of not more than $1,000 or by imprisonment in the county jail for a period not to exceed six months, or by both fine and imprisonment. Each day during any portion of which such violation is committed, continued or permitted shall constitute a separate offense and shall be punishable as such (Ord. 98-0021§1 (part), 1998). " In addition, the Permittee or Authorized Representative and their contractors are subject to enforcement action by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), Environmental Protection Agency, private citizens and citizen groups. The Permittee or Authorized Representative and their contractors shall be responsible for the costs and for liabilities imposed by law as a result of the Permittee or Authorized Representative or their contractor's failure to comply. Costs and liabilities include, but are not limited to, fines, penalties and damages whether assessed against LACDPW or the Permittee or Authorized Representative or their contractors, including those levied under the Federal Clean Water Act and the State Porter Cologne Water Quality Act. Table 1 Construction Site BMPs ID BMP Name Minimum Requirement(') Tem or ry Soil Stabilization SS -1 Scheduling Preservation of Existing Vegetation SS -3 Hydraulic Mulch PX(2)SS-2 SS -4 Hydroseeding SS -5 Soil Binders SS -6 Straw Mulch SS -7 Geotextiles, Plastic Covers, & Erosion Control Blankets/Mats(3) SS -8 Wood Mulching SS -9 Earth Dikes/Drainage Swales & Ditches SS -10 Outlet Protection/Velocity Dissipation Devices SS -11 Slope Drains SS -12 Streambank Stabilization Tem or ry Sediment Control SC -1 Silt Fence (4) SC -2 Desilting Basin SC -3 Sediment Trap SC -4 Check Dam SC -5 Fiber Rolls SC -6 Gravel Bag Berm SC -7 Street Sweeping and Vacuuming X SC -8 Sandbag Barrier SC -9 Straw Bale Barrier SC -10 Storm Drain Protection X(2) Wind Erosion Control WE -1 I Wind Erosion Control X(2) Tracking Control TC -1 Stabilized Construction Entrance/Exit TC -2 Stabilized Construction Roadway TC -3 Entrance/Outlet Tire Wash Additional BMPs may be required based on actual field condition, Contractor operations, or construction operations. (Z) Not all minimum requirements may be applicable to every project. Applicability to a specific project shall be verified by the Permittee or Authorized Representative and their Contractor. (3) The Permittee or Authorized Representative and their Contractors shall select one of the identified soil stabilization BMPs or a combination thereof. (4) The Permittee or Authorized Representative and their Contractors shall select one of the identified sediment control barrier BMPs or a combination thereof. (5) Dewatering BMPs are required for discharging accumulated precipitation (rain and snow melt) and for potential contact with groundwater during excavation. Separate permit requirements are applicable for construction dewatering of groundwater. Table 1 (continued) Construction Site BMPs ID BMP Name Minimum Requirement(') Non -Storm Water Management NS -1 Water Conservation Practices NS -2 Dewatering Operations (5) NS -3 Paving and Grinding Operations NS -4 Temporary Stream Crossing NS -5 Clear Water Diversion NS -6 Illicit Connection/Illegal Discharge Detection and Reporting X NS -7 Potable Water/Irrigation NS -8 Vehicle Equipment Cleaning X NS -9 Vehicle Equipment Fueling X NS -10 Vehicle Equipment Maintenance X NS -11 Pile Driving Operations NS -12 Concrete Curing NS -13 Material and Equipment Use Over Water NS -14 Concrete Finishing NS -15 Structure Demolition/Removal Over or Adjacent to Waters NS -16 I Temporary Batch Plant Waste Management and Material Pollution Control WM-1 Material Delivery X WM-2 Material Use X WM-3 Stockpile Management WM-4 Spill Prevention and Control X WM-5 Solid Waste Management X(2) WM-6 Hazardous Waste Management WM-7 Contaminated Soil Management WM-8 Concrete Waste Management WM-9 Sanitary/Septic Waste Management X WM-10 Liquid Waste Management Additional BMPs may be required based on actual field condition, Contractor operations, or construction operations. (Z) Not all minimum requirements may be applicable to every project. Applicability to a specific project shall be verified by the Permittee or Authorized Representative and their Contractor. (3) The Permittee or Authorized Representative and their Contractors shall select one of the identified soil stabilization BMPs or a combination thereof. (4) The Permittee or Authorized Representative and their Contractors shall select one of the identified sediment control barrier BMPs or a combination thereof. (5) Dewatering BMPs are required for discharging accumulated precipitation (rain and snow melt) and for potential contact with groundwater during excavation. Separate permit requirements are applicable for construction dewatering of groundwater. Notice of Non -Permitted Discharge To: Date: Subject: Notice of Discharge Project Name: Permit Number: Date, time, and location of discharge: Type of operation that resulted in the discharge: Describe any adverse impacts resulting from the discharge: Describe existing BMP(s) in place prior to the discharge event: Date and type of corrective action or BMPs deployed after the discharge: Proposed corrective actions to be taken to reduce, eliminate, andlor prevent recurrence of the discharge: Name of Contact Person Company Signature Title Telephone Number Date Attachment B County Permit Policies PERMIT POLICY DURING THE STORM SEASON While it is the Department's Standard policy to not allow permitted work within a flood control facility during the specified storm season, we recognize the necessity of sometimes working within channels during the storm season. Although each case must be evaluated separately, the following guidelines are intended to serve as consistent instruction for reviewing such cases. CHANNELS Armorps Constructed Channels- No construction work whatsoever affecting the channel structure or carrying capacity during the period of October 15 to April 15. Access with mobile equipment, to be removed at the end of each workday, is allowed with a 5 -day clear weather forecast. No storage of equipment and materials is allowed within the channel/storm drain. Storm drain connection work is allowed if - 1. i1. Connecting pipe size is 24 -in. or less in diameter 2. Five-day clear weather forecast 3. Seal the opening on the channel with a 1/2 -inch steel plate extending 6 -inches beyond the opening in all directions at the end of each day. 4. Plate edges must be impermeable and secured with 1/2- inch diameter bolts spaced at 12 -inches. 5. Channel is rectangular (No connections to trapezoidal channels are allowed) L.A. County Flood Control District Channels- Limited work is allowed within the channels as long as full capacity can be maintained or restored within 5 -days of predicted rain. Access with mobile equipment, to be removed at the end of each workday, is allowed with a 5 -day clear weather forecast. No storage of equipment and materials is allowed within the channel/storm drain. Storm drain connection work is allowed if: 1. Connecting pipe size is 24 -in. or less in diameter 2. Five-day clear weather forecast 3. Seal the opening on the channel with a 1/2 -inch steel plate extending 6 -inches beyond the opening in all directions at the end of each day. 4. Plate edges must be impermeable and secured with 1/2- inch diameter bolts spaced at 12 -inches. 5. Channel is rectangular (No connections to trapezoidal channels are allowed) UNDERGROUND STORM DRAINS Limited work is allowed within the underground storm drains as long as full capacity can be maintained or restored within 5 -days of predicted rain. Storm drain connection work is allowed i£ 1. Connecting pipe size is 24 -in. or less in diameter 2. Five-day clear weather forecast 3. For concrete box mainlines seal the opening of the breakout limits with a %-inch steel plate extending 6 -inches beyond the opening in all directions at the end of each day. 4. Plate edges must be impermeable and secured with %2- inch diameter bolts spaced at 12 -inches. 5. For pipe to pipe connections the work must be started and completed prior to any forecasted rain. During the period from April 15 to October 15, falsework and cofferdams may be placed and excavations made in the channel. However, capacity to convey flows around any obstructions or openings in the channel lining shall be provided as follows: April 16 to May 31: 33% of design capacity. June 1 to August 31: 5% of design capacity. September 1 to October 14: 33% of design capacity. Hydraulic calculations substantiating capacity must be reviewed and approved prior to start of construction. I:\Section\Permits\Flood\Master\STORMPOLICY.wpd Attachment C County Guidelines for Overbuilding and Air Rights LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT GUIDELINES FOR OVERBUILDING AND AIR RIGHTS CONSTRUCTION DIVISION - PERMITS AND SUBDIVISIONS SECTION REVISED JUNE 2004 CONTENTS I. EXAMPLES OF OVERBUILDING 11 -1- TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 A. INTRODUCTION 2 B. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 2 1. Joint Use Right of Way 2 2. Master Planning 2 3. Compatibility 3 4. Indemnification and Insurance 3 C. CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS 3 1. Types of Overbuilding 3 2. Criteria for Design and Analysis for Overbuilding 4 3. Aesthetic Requirements 6 D. OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS 6 E. RIGHT OF WAY AVAILABILITY 7 1. Operating Right of Way 7 2. Excess Right of Way 7 F. OTHER REQUIREMENTS 7 G. DOCUMENTS 8 H. PROCEDURE TO BE FOLLOWED FOR USE OF DISTRICT'S FACILITIES 8 I. EXAMPLES OF OVERBUILDING 11 -1- GUIDELINES FOR OVERBUILDING AND AIR RIGHTS A. INTRODUCTION The purpose of these guidelines is to provide information relative to the various possible uses by other parties of the District's rights of way for overbuilding open channels and covered storm drains to create surface areas, to identify and resolve areas of incompatibility, and to provide the basic requirements for specific proposals that will maximize the long-range benefits to the public and the District. The guidelines recognize that channels and their rights of way, in addition to providing flood protection, have the potential as transportation, utility, and recreational corridors, for overbuilding for public housing development, and are also desired by some communities as open space areas. Requirements are included to protect the District's interest to ensure that proper operation and maintenance of the channels and other uses can be accomplished. Private parties are encouraged to use District's rights whenever a proposal is found to be compatible with District's needs and authorized or planned uses by others. To this end, the District's goal is to allow utilization of its rights of way to the most efficient degree possible. B. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Joint Use Right of Way Interested public agencies and developers should consult the District at an early stage regarding joint use, the extent of the rights held by the District, and the areas that may be reserved for other public uses. In some instances, competitive bidding for use of the right of way and air rights may be required. In those instances where District's holding is not of sufficient size to be useful in itself and a proposal is received to utilize District's open channel in conjunction with adjoining ownership, a bidding proposal will not be undertaken. For operating right of way, overbuilding by others will be allowed provided District needs for flood control and all existing foreign uses authorized by the District are protected or provided for as further described in Item 3 below. Proposed uses must accommodate recreational, utility, transportation, public housing, and open space requirements that are programmed for the channel in question. Master Planning District is developing a Property Use Plan (PUP) for each major flood control channel to ensure that the channel rights of way are developed in a manner compatible with the adjoining properties and yield the maximum benefit to the local community. Proposals should be in conformance with the plan; however, if a desired use is different, the applicant will be required to submit a change (amendment) to the plan for approval. An amendment may be acceptable, provided the change for a particular reach of channel is between successive streets and approved by the local planning agency. Also, all environmental requirements will have to be fulfilled to the satisfaction of the lead agency. -2- Compatibility a. Joint use will have to provide for District's paramount right to use its right of way for flood control purposes and shall not adversely affect design, construction, operation, maintenance, or integrity of District's existing or proposed facilities. b. A facility that may affect any non -District installations shall be designed, constructed, operated, and maintained to be compatible with them. All approvals required of other agencies and parties shall be the responsibility of the applicant. District will make its records available regarding other permittees and users of its right of way. C. Public agencies needs, including, but not limited to, recreation, transportation, overbuilding for public housing, and open space, either authorized or proposed, will have to be accounted for by joint use. Recreation and transportation standards will be provided by the District for each proposal. d. Joint uses will have to comply with all State, County, and local zoning and building regulations. The District wishes to remain a "good neighbor" to the surrounding area and will not allow a use that it or the local community would find objectionable. Therefore, proposals should be aesthetically pleasing, compatible with surrounding areas, conducive to long-term use, and reflect good planning. 4. Indemnifications and Insurance Unless otherwise waived by the District, upon a showing of adequate ability to indemnify the District, all users shall furnish the District a policy of insurance coverage naming the District (and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, when applicable) as coinsured. The coverage shall indemnify the District against any loss or damage as may be required by the District but not less than $250,000/$1,000,000 for liability and $250,000 for property damage, all as further described in the lease document to be entered into by applicant. Applicant will also be required to provide a policy of fire and extended coverage insurance. The amount of the insurance will be dependent on the full replacement value of the channel cover and appurtenant structures. C. CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS Types of Overbuilding The methods introduce here serve as a general guidelines only. Each case is different and will have to be considered case by case. There are three basic methods of overbuilding (see pages 11, 12, and 13 of Section 1). Method "A" is to keep the cover above the channel as low as possible and do away with District access roads and fences. Method "B" is to keep the structure well above the top of the channel so as to allow continuous access to the channel for cleaning and maintenance of the channel, recreational trails, and transportation or utility corridors. In general, Method "A" can be used for channels less than 25 feet wide. Method "B" can be used for channels over 60 feet wide. Method "A" may be used for channels between 25 feet and 60 feet wide if it can be shown to the District's satisfaction that no special side drainage, channel maintenance, recreation, or corridor use problems exist. Method "C" is for building over underground conduits. -3- 2. Criteria for Design and Analysis of Overbuilding Plans and calculations submitted for overbuilding must be signed by a civil or structural engineer licensed to practice in the State of California. Cover systems, protective devices, and conduits shall be designed and/or analyzed based on loads and criteria consistent with the intended use of the area, but shall result in a system not less than one meeting the following requirements: a. Dead Loads: Earth Loads: Vertical and lateral loads are to be in accordance with the District's Structural Design Manual. Overburden must be shown on the drawings. Structure Loads: The loads to be used are the actual direct loads or as transmitted through earth fill as determined by a recognized method (e.g. Bousinesq). b. Live Loads: Railroad Bridges or Crossings: Cooper E Loads are to be determined by servicing or franchised railroad. Distribution of loads and impact is to be as shown in District's Structural Design Manual. Highway Bridges, Street Crossing, and Ingress and Egress Routes: HS -20 truck loading with impact in accordance with ASSHTO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges is to be used. Parking or Exterior Storage: A uniform load consistent with type of storage or parking is to be used, 100 psf minimum, plus one HS -20 truck with impact, placed at locations to provide maximum stresses. The uniform load does not have to occupy the area of the truck. Minimum truck impact shall be 10 percent of the live load. Interior Storage and Other Structures: The load shall be consistent with use as accepted by the jurisdictional Building Department. Other Areas not Normally Accessible by Vehicles or Covered by a Structure: H-15 truck with impact of at least 10 percent is to be used. C. Wide and Seismic Loads: The loads are to be as accepted by the jurisdictional Building Department. -4- d. Design Methods and Stresses: Railroad Bridges or Crossing: Design is to be in accordance with the AREA Manual for Railroad Engineering. Highway Bridges, Street Crossings, and Ingress and Egress Routes: Design is to be in accordance with the AASHTO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges. Concrete design may be either working stress or strength in accordance with American Concrete ACI 318 except that load factors for strength design shall be per AASHTO. Concrete structures maintained by the District are to be analyzed using the working stress method only. All Others: Design is to be in accordance with the AISC Manual of Steel Construction, Nation Design Specification for stress -grade lumber or ACI 318, as appropriated, nothing that concrete structures maintained by the District are to be analyzed using the working stress method. e. Foundations: Directly on drain: 1) Structure must be removable if not required for stability of the drain. 2) The storm drain must not be over -stressed by the structure. An engineering analysis of all elements of the storm drain structure must be submitted. The analysis is to be based on methods and loads shown in the District's Structural Design Manual in addition to surcharge loads due to permit work. 3) Where appropriate, a soil investigation and report will be required. Independent but Surcharge Drain (including surcharge fill): 1) Same as No. 2 above. 2) The structure must provide a minimum of 6 -inches horizontal clearance from any element of the drain, including subdrain pipes and at least 18 - inches vertical clearance from a box or pipe conduit, and 6 -inches vertical clearance from an open channel. 3) A soils engineer must analyze the foundation. Analysis is to include a soil investigation and report. Exploratory excavations must extend below foundation. Analysis must also include uplift pressures on the invert where appropriate. -5- No Effect on Drain: 1) Same as No. 2 and 3, above (independent but surcharge drain). Piles must be sleeved, as necessary; to prevent drag forces on the drain and bearing areas must be sufficiently deep so as not to produce uplift pressures. 2) The hydraulic capacity of flood control facility will have to be maintained. Normally, no construction will be allowed below the top of the channel walls if it encroaches within the design freeboard area. Types of structure for the covering will be specified to allow for standardizing the types of construction whenever possible. 3) The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is conducting a hydrologic study of various drainage areas (LACDA project). Therefore, any proposed development may have to provide for existing channels to be widened or for channel walls to be heightened. The District will provide information relative to the status and/or requirements of this study or other controls that must be met. 4) Any proposed development should provide a means for local run-off to enter the channel after said channel has been covered. Side drainage problems also should be investigated where a channel is below the surrounding ground level and existing side drains are inadequate or designed to a lesser frequency than the main channel. In these cases, interested parties will be required to do one or all of the following: (1) construct additional drainage inlets, (2) leave a section of channel uncovered, or (3) use Method "B" for overbuilding (see page 13). Channel covering usually requires that access facilities to the channel invert be constructed also. See Section D, Operational Requirements, for more information. Aesthetic Requirements Surface structures shall be constructed to be aesthetically compatible with the area and District's facilities based on current standards and economic feasibility. Landscaping or other aesthetic measures may be required to mitigate the impact of structures on its environs. D. OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS To optimize safety and ensure the hydraulic and structural integrity of a particular flood control channel, the District and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers have a number of operational requirements that must be met by every joint use proposal. The following is a list of the major requirements. Please note that this list should not be considered complete or absolute. The requirements are: Access into a covered channel is required every 500 feet. This access is usually of a pedestrian nature and could be in the form of manholes, ladders, etc. Adequate clearances inside the channel (a minimum height of channel wall) must be maintained throughout the channel for the transportation of heavy equipment used in channel repair, bridge, and bridge abutment repair, etc. In the event the channel is to be covered, adequate ventilation must be provided to prevent the build-up of noxious or volatile fumes. A short reach of the channel, 30 feet or so, to remain uncovered, thereby aiding channel maintenance and repair in that equipment and material could be lowered into or removed from the channel. E. RIGHT OF WAY AVAILABILITY Operating Right of Way a. Fee Title Generally, joint uses may be authorized on rights of way held in fee by the District. However, there may be legal encumbrances in the form of prior easements, leases, and rental agreements, which may have to be cured prior to the proposed joint use. Also, "paper streets" or unused easements for public street purposes may exist. There also may be other conditions, covenants, and restrictions to the District's title. Since perfecting title is very time-consuming, all proposals for joint use should be submitted as early as possible for right of way clearance. b. Much of the District's right of way is in the form of flood control easements. Where long reaches of fee are interspersed with short reaches of easements, it may be economically feasible to acquire the underlying fee. C. All costs attendant to perfecting title or acquiring the underlying fee will be borne by the proposed developer or public agency. Excess Right of Way District has, in addition to its operating right of way, excess property holdings, both in fee and easement. In most instances, the fee property can be incorporated into the joint use proposal. For an easement area, approval of the underlying fee owner will be required. F. OTHER REQUIREMENTS 1. Where the applicant is a private organization, after approval of the concept by the District, for fee -owned rights of way, an agreement to lease (option) will be entered into between District and applicant. This will give the applicant assurance that the right of way is available for consideration by the applicant as to duration and terms. 2. In addition to the General Provisions of District's standard permit to be issued for construction, special provisions my be required because of the nature, design, or location of proposed installation. 3. Construction must commence within six months of date of permit unless otherwise approved by Chief Engineer and be completed in accordance with an approved schedule. 4. Construction work within the channel rights of way involving removal and restoration of the channel structure, excavation, and backfill shall be accomplished during the period of April 15 to October 15. 5. As -built drawings and installation of identification markers for subsurface structures will be required by the District. Markers must not be placed so as to interfere with use of District's vehicular service roads. -7- Any relocation of survey monuments defining District's right of way boundaries will be performed by District's surveyors with the permittee underwriting the costs of such relocation. G. DOCUMENTS The District will allow overbuilding and use of air rights by a long-term lease over fee -owned property. These lease documents will provide for protection of the District's interest if nonpayment occurs, liability, etc. The leave will contain requirements that will protect the District's interest and provide for rental income. The District will monitor the lease throughout its term to ensure compliance with provisions. The term of the lease will be for a period long enough for a developer to amortize the cost of covering the channel and his construction loan, plus an additional time period (usually ten years) to obtain a return on his investment. The amortization of the cost to cover the channel may be reflected in the rent. The rent will be based on Fair Rental Value (FRV) of the property. If the appraisal approach considers channel cover as an on-site improvement, there will not be an amortization period for the cost of cover. Periodically, increases in rent based on fixed step increases or changes in the Wholesale Price Index (WPI) or periodic review of FRV, as the situation calls for, will be assessed. The lease will contain an option period to provide a developer time to complete the environmental considerations, complete the permit process, and obtain a lender. Where District has easement rights, overbuilding by the underlying fee owner can most likely be handled by permit with some type of mutually agreed upon maintenance agreement. In addition, because the District's easement for flood control purposes is, in some instances, tantamount to having the fee ownership, compensation will be required from the permittee because of the reduction in the District's use of its right of way to that of an easement for a covered drain; i.e., loss of surface use. Should the permittee be someone other than the underlying fee owner, evidence of approval of the fee owner would also be required. H. PROCEDURE TO BE FOLLOWED FOR USE OF DISTRICT'S FACILITIES BY OTHERS Prospective users must submit a written application for overbuilding or covering of open channels for proposed surface use and/or air rights use. This application should be addressed to: Los Angeles County Department of Public Works Construction Division Permits and Subdivisions Section - 8t" Floor 900 South Fremont Avenue Alhambra, CA 91803-1331 Early application, particularly for a major installation, is recommended. The following information is required: a. Six sets of preliminary drawings showing the location of the proposed covering, the desired surface use, the existing flood control facilities and stationing, and the District's right of way. b. Owner of proposed improvement. C. Preliminary construction program. d. Required time of land use. In District's review will be to determine the overall acceptability of the proposal and, if readily available, the approximate annual cost for leasing should the District's property be fee owned. If the District responds favorable to this application, a meeting will be arranged with the applicant and representatives of the District's Mapping and Property Management Division to discuss the criteria to be used for submittal of preliminary plans and general terms for leasing the District's properties and/or maintenance responsibilities. Applicant shall submit six sets of preliminary plans and design calculations, structural and hydraulic, if necessary for approval, and two copies of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (if required by an appropriate authority) when available. At this time, a deposit for the plan review will be required. The fees for checking of plans for covering of channels, including structural or hydraulic or other review as deemed necessary by the District are based on the current fee schedule adopted by the Board of Supervisors. Presently the fees are: Case I; clear span, actual cost to the District ($500 min.) and Case II; all others, actual cost to the District ($600 min.). After preliminary plans have been approved, a final submittal must be made prior to issuance of construction permit. This final submittal should contain the following: a. Four sets of final construction plans signed by a civil or structural engineer licensed to practice in California, showing proposed covering of channel. Plans should show existing improvements (both District and foreign in the construction area) and proposed improvements over proposed covering, District right of way limits, working areas, existing utilities, etc. In connection therewith, applicant will be responsible for inspecting the right of way, searching all available records, and ascertaining all foreign users of the rights of way. The District will aid in providing all its information regarding permits issued by the District. b. Inspection fees\deposits are based upon estimated actual cost determined by District; should the cost be less, the District will refund the difference. If the cost is more, applicant will submit additional amount. Upon review and approval of the final submittal, and payment of all fees, including deposit for first year's rental for leases, District will issue a construction permit. Approval of construction will be valid only to the extent of District jurisdiction. Also, the District may require a performance bond and liability insurance to protect the District's interest. 4. After the District responds favorably to this application, an Agreement to Lease (option) can be entered into between District and applicant. This commitment will be honored by the District for a period of one full year or longer, if so specified in the Agreement. At this time, the applicant will be required to deposit funds for preparation of the Agreement and the appraisal to determine the annual lease cost. These costs will be credited to applicant in the first year's rent should lease be finalized, otherwise the fees deposited will be waived. Note: In the event the applicant needs to know the cost prior to preparation of preliminary plans and finalization of the lease arrangement, applicant will be required to deposit funds for the District's cost for the work. Cost will be credited for first year's rent as stated above. Applicant may proceed with construction under terms and conditions of the permit. Construction must be initiated within one year of the date of issuance of permit unless otherwise approved by the Chief Engineer. The District will prepare the appropriate document or lease, in accordance with the terms of the Agreement previously entered into. In Upon completion of construction, one set of reproducible as -built drawings shall be submitted to the District within 180 days. In the event time warrants, one document only (lease) may be sued for the right of way negotiations. The document should be fully executed (signed by both parties) prior to submittal of final plans and before a construction permit is issued. Execution of the lease first is satisfactory with District provided applicant understands and accepts the fact that the plan review and issuance of the permit takes 30 to 60 days to complete. If there is a deadline for the applicant, the plans should include this time period. O:\Section\Permits\Flood\M aster\G U I DELI N ES -OV E R -AI RIG HTS.doc -10- I. EXAMPLES OF OVERBUILDING Pr;ction Pose flu- I ; re o Ccisson 4 TYPE OF OVERBUILDING METHap A LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Construction 07v;sicr-. -11- I ME TYPE OF OVERBUILDING MFTHQB Fricticn Pile Out ine o-;— Ca:550n LOS ANGELES COUNTY OEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Construction OiViSiOn PER41T AND SUBDIVISIONS SECTION Subcrc:n ;min] -12- Project No. Dote Preperea by P;cure: 05/02/2000 jll Fraction Piie ---* Out I i ne o4 ^-- C❑iSSQn I� TYPE OF OVERBUILDING METHOD "A" 18" M',n LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Construction D;vi5iol PEPV- ANO S,;eDIVIS[ONS SEC. -1C.% 1 1 EXIST;NG DRAIN -'-----I P-'OjeCT No -13- De Te Preocrec Dyt Attachment D Urban Freeway Cap Parks Urban Freeway Cap Parks Policy Briefing Paper Considering the Barriers and Opportunities for More Park Space in Los Angeles Project ID #103 I/ F'r c 0\, a Prepared by: Clement Lau, AICP Candidate, Doctor of Policy, Planning, and Development University of Southern California Prepared for: Los Angeles Sustainability Collaborative DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this paper and related materials are those of the author's alone, and do not reflect the opinions of the Los Angeles Sustainability Collaborative, its Board Members, or any employer thereof. The Los Angeles Sustainability Collaborative is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied in this paper, and reference herein to any specific product, process, policy, trade name, trademark, individual, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the LASC, it's Board Members, or any employer thereof. TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Executive Summary 2 1. Introduction 3 2. Problem and Background 3 3. Pros and Cons of Capping Freeways to Create Park Space 7 4. Examples of Existing Freeway Cap Parks 9 5. Current Status of Proposed Cap Parks in Los Angeles County 11 6. Implementation 15 7. Conclusion 19 References 20 Table Page 1. Total Parks and Open Space as Percentage of City Area 4 2. Children's Park Access in Seven Major Cities 5 3. Summary of Pros and Cons of Cap Parks 7 4. Examples of Cap Parks 9 5. Major Cap Park Proposals in Los Angeles County 12 Figure Page 1. Public Parks and Open Space in Los Angeles 4 2. Neighborhoods with the Greatest Need for New Parks 6 3. Freeway Park 9 4. South River Walk Park 10 5. Hance Park 10 6. Rose Kennedy Greenway 11 7. Major Cap Park Proposals in Los Angeles County 12 8. Hollywood Central Park 13 9. PARK 101 District 14 10. Cap Park at Ocean AvenueAth Street 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This policy briefing paper is the product of more than just my own efforts. Special thanks to all those who have provided valuable feedback and support: my wife Susan; Dr. David Sloane of the USC School of Policy, Planning, and Development; David Berneman and Mara Elana Burstein of the Los Angeles Sustainability Collaborative; Vaughan Davies of AECOM; Gerdo Aquino of SWA Group; Professor Andrea Hricko of the USC Keck School of Medicine; Laurie Goldman of Friends of the Hollywood Central Park; and Julie Yom. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Cap parks, also referred to as highway or deck parks, are parks built over segments of freeways that are below grade. Four major cap park proposals are currently being considered in the Los Angeles region, including the Hollywood Central Park, PARK 101 in downtown, and two smaller cap parks in Santa Monica. This policy briefing paper is intended to help policy makers, environmental advocates, and the general public to better understand cap parks, and the associated environmental and public health issues. Specifically, this paper offers a background on the shortage of public parks in the Los Angeles region, discusses the pros and cons of cap parks, studies four examples of cap parks built elsewhere, describes current cap park proposals, and addresses the barriers and constraints to implementing cap parks in the Los Angeles region. The lack of public parks in Los Angeles is an issue that demands urgent attention. Nearly two out of three children in Los Angeles County do not live within walking distance (one-quarter mile) of a park, playground or open space. These children are more likely to be obese and are at higher risk of developing asthma, diabetes, or obesity related diseases. Los Angeles needs more parks and open spaces to meet the recreation and public health needs of its residents, especially children. Capping segments of freeways to create park space is one way to address the shortage of parks in the region. Like any proposed solution to a problem, the idea of cap parks has both pros and cons. Capping segments of freeways is a good way to create large new parks in urban areas where vacant land is scarce. By building on unused space over freeways, creation of cap parks will not displace residences or businesses and can reconnect neighborhoods or communities divided by freeways. Large cap parks have the potential to generate economic benefits, including enhanced values to adjacent properties, attraction of businesses and visitors, and creation of new jobs. Political and business leaders are particularly eager to advocate for and support visions of large new parks. Los Angeles has the benefit of learning from the experiences of other cities where cap parks have been built. The four examples studied in this paper offer insights as to the potential benefits and challenges with the implementation of cap park projects of varying sizes at diverse locations. Construction costs will be high for new cap parks, especially large ones. Operation and maintenance costs will also be significant for large cap parks given their size and amenities. Time and process required for cap park development will be lengthy and complicated. Feasibility, environmental, economic, and other studies must be completed before actual construction begins. In addition, cap parks may expose park users to potential health risks related to air quality and noise. However, these impacts could be addressed through innovative park design and other mitigation measures. As land has become increasingly scarce in Los Angeles, we need creative and resourceful planning solutions to meet the park and recreational needs of the population. Cap parks offer hope and benefits that simply cannot be ignored. In particular, larger cap parks have the potential to: improve regional air quality; help reduce obesity and its associated problems; create short- and long-term jobs; raise adjacent property values; and enhance the overall quality of life. While they can be costly and complex projects that are challenging to implement, cap parks represent a strategy that must be seriously considered to promote sustainability, address the need for more parkland, and reconnect neighborhoods that have been fragmented as a result of freeway construction. 2 1. INTRODUCTION Cap parks, also referred to as highway or deck parks, are parks built over segments of freeways that are below grade. Four major cap park proposals are currently being considered in the Los Angeles region, including the Hollywood Central Park, PARK 101 in downtown, and two smaller cap parks in Santa Monica. This policy briefing paper is intended to help policy makers, environmental advocates, and the general public to better understand cap parks, and the associated environmental and public health issues. Specifically, this paper offers a background on the shortage of public parks in the Los Angeles region (Section 2), discusses the pros and cons of cap parks (Section 3), studies four examples of cap parks built elsewhere (Section 4), describes current cap park proposals (Section 5), and addresses the barriers and constraints to implementing cap parks in the Los Angeles region (Section 6). 2. PROBLEM AND BACKGROUND Problem The lack of public parks in Los Angeles is an issue that demands urgent attention. Nearly two out of three children in Los Angeles County do not live within walking distance (one-quarter mile) of a park, playground or open space.' These children are more likely to be obese and are at higher risk of developing asthma, diabetes, or obesity related disease.2 Los Angeles needs more parks and open spaces to meet the recreation and public health needs of its residents, especially children. Capping segments of freeways to create park space is one way to address the shortage of parks in the region and is the focus of this paper. Background In 1930, the firm Olmsted Brothers and Bartholomew & Associates submitted a report titled "Parks, Playgrounds, and Beaches in the Los Angeles Region" to the Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce.3 The report proposed a comprehensive and coherent network of parks, playgrounds, schools, beaches, forests, and transportation to promote the social, economic, and environmental vitality of Los Angeles and the health of its residents. The Olmsted -Bartholomew Plan was a model of visionary and bold planning commissioned at a time when land was available and the region's population was growing tremendously. However, the plan was never adopted and only segments of the report have been implemented to date due to a variety of political, economic, and financial reasons. Today, Los Angeles is one of the most park -poor cities in the United States. With only 10 percent of its total area devoted to parks and open space, Los Angeles lags behind all other major cities on the west coast (see Table 1) and ranks below New York and Philadelphia nationally. In addition, parks and open spaces are distributed unevenly in the region, with a significant portion of parkland located away from the urban core and underserved communities (see Figure 1). Griffith Park, for example, has an area of over 4,000 acres, but does not provide for the active recreation elements ' Trust for Public Land. (2004, November). No place to play: a comparative analysis of park access in seven major cities, p. 4. 2 Los Angeles County Department of Public Health (2007, October). Preventing childhood obesity: the need to create healthy places, p. 5. 3 Hise, G. & Deverell, W. (2000). Eden by Design: the 1930 Olmsted -Bartholomew Plan for the Los Angeles Region, p. 1. 3 typically available in an urban park.4 The park consists primarily of rugged hillsides and mountains, and is difficult to reach without a car. Table 1: Total Parks and Open Space as Percentage of City Area City City Area (in acres) Total Parks/Open Space (in acres) Park/Open Space as Percentage of City Area Los Angeles 300,352 30,121 10.0% Seattle 53,696 6,194 11.5% Portland 79,808 12,591 15.8% San Diego 207,360 36,108 17.4% San Francisco 29,888 7,594 25.4% Source: Harnik. 2000. Figure 1: Public Parks and Open Space in Los Angeles JUUIUC. I IUSI IUI r-UUIIU LdIIU, LUV'+. Another indicator of park needs in a community is access as measured by the percentage of children within walking distance or one-quarter mile of a park.5 Los Angeles offers its children the 4 Active recreation requires constructed facilities such as basketball courts and fields for soccer and football. M worst access to parks among the seven major cities evaluated.6 As shown in Table 2 below, only one-third of the city's children live within walking distance of a park. Table 2: Children's Park Access in Seven Major Cities City Percentage of children within one-quarter mile of a park Number of children not within one-quarter mile of a park Los Angeles Los Angeles County 33% 36% 657,700 1,694,400 Dallas 42% 182,800 San Diego 65% 102,300 Seattle 79% 18,600 San Francisco 85% 16,700 New York 91% 178,500 Boston 97% 2,900 Source: Trust for Public Land, 2004. Access to and availability of public facilities for physical activity, such as parks and playgrounds, has an important role in the prevention and treatment of obesity. Research shows that when people have access to parks, they are more likely to exercise, which can reduce obesity and its associated health risks and costs.' A number of studies reviewed in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine showed that "creation of or enhanced access to places for physical activity combined with informational outreach" produced a 48 percent increase in the frequency of physical activity.$ These studies also found that easy access to a place to exercise resulted in a five percent median increase in aerobic capacity, along with weight loss, a reduction in body fat, and improvements in flexibility.9 There are unfair park and health disparities in Los Angeles based on ethnicity, income, and access to cars.10 Children of color disproportionately live in communities of concentrated poverty without enough parks and playgrounds to play in, and do not have the means to reach parks in other neighborhoods. Figure 2 identifies neighborhoods in Los Angeles with the greatest need for new parks. These neighborhoods have high concentrations of residents under the age of 18 and have 5 Most cities and counties rely on National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA) standards to determine whether they have enough parks. These standards are expressed in terms of acres per 1,000 residents. While these standards are helpful as general measures of parkland availability, they were established decades earlier and do not accurately reflect the environment and variety of communities today. NRPA standards, for example, do not address access nor do they include many types of open space common in urban environments such as greenbelts and trails. In addition, these standards are silent on the issue of equity; the same standards are used regardless of whether a community is currently park -poor or park -rich. 6 Trust for Public Land. (2004, November). No place to play: a comparative analysis of park access in seven major cities, p. 6. Gies, E. (2006). The Health Benefits of Parks, p. 8. 8 Kahn, E. et al (2002). The Effectiveness of Interventions to Increase Physical Activity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, pp. 87-88. s Ibid. 10 Garcia, R. & White, A. (2006). Healthy Parks, Schools, and Communities: Mapping Green Access and Equity for Los Angeles Region, p. 3. W1 limited or no parks within walking distance. The health implications of the lack of physical activity are significant. Children in underserved communities are much more likely to suffer from obesity, diabetes, and other diseases related to inactivity.11 Garcia and White (2006) even declared that "this is the first generation in the history of this country in which children will have a lower life expectancy than their parents if present trends continue" (p. 3). Figure 2: Neighborhoods with the Greatest Need for New Parks Source: Trust for Public Land, 2004. Fortunately, a coalition of community-based environmental and social justice groups has emerged recently to lead efforts to address inequities in the provision of parks in the Los Angeles area.12 This coalition is trying to revive the Olmsted -Bartholomew vision and has experienced some success along the Los Angeles River and at nearby lands that were previously slated for non -park 11 Los Angeles County Department of Public Health (2007, October). Preventing childhood obesity: the need to create healthy places, p. 5. 12 This coalition was led by The City Project (formerly of the Center for Law in the Public Interest) and included (but not limited to): Friends of the Los Angeles River, Concerned Citizens of South Central Los Angeles, and the Catholic Archdiocese of Los Angeles. [e development. Specific examples include the Cornfield near Chinatown and Taylor Yard, both of which have been developed with State parks serving inner city residents. 13 In addition, the business community as well as planning and design professionals have advocated for large new urban cap parks in Los Angeles. One proposal is the "PARK 101" idea which calls for a new 100 -acre park district in downtown Los Angeles. 14 Another is the proposed 44 -acre Hollywood Central Park which has the support of the Hollywood Chamber of Commerce and numerous political leaders.15 Proponents of both proposals believe that the parks would offer economic benefits in addition to addressing the park deficit in Los Angeles, including: enhancing real estate values, attracting tourists and businesses, and creating jobs. Prominent park researcher Dr. John L. Crompton (2001) has demonstrated through his studies that the economic values of parks can be measured and their economic benefits can be realized through appropriate design, siting, maintenance, and marketing. 16 3. PROS AND CONS OF CAPPING FREEWAYS TO CREATE PARK SPACE Cap parks, also referred to as highway or deck parks, are parks built over segments of freeways that are below grade. Like any proposed solution to a problem, the idea of cap parks has both pros and cons as discussed below. Table 3: Summary of Pros and Cons of Cap Parks Pros Capping segments of freeways is a good way to create large new parks in urban areas where vacant land is scarce. It is very difficult, if not impossible, to acquire and assemble several acres of land in densely populated areas to create new parks. Major challenges include the high cost of land acquisition and community opposition, especially when displacement of residences and/or 13 More information regarding the Cornfield and Taylor Yard are provided in Arnold (2007)'s Fair and Healthy Land Use: Environmental Justice and Planning, pp. 112-113. 14 Davies, V. (2008, August). A "Central Park" for Los Angeles? Urban Land, 67(8), pp. 42-45. About 16 acres of the park district would be a cap over the 101 Freeway. 15 Hollywood Chamber of Commerce. (2007). Fact Sheet: Hollywood Freeway Central Park. 16 Crompton, J.L. (2001). Parks and economic development. Pros Cons ✓ Create large new parks in park -poor urban x Construction, operation, and maintenance areas costs are high for large cap parks ✓ Reconnect neighborhoods divided by freeways X Time and process required for park ✓ Enhance adjacent property values development will be lengthy ✓ Attract businesses and visitors X Only one or two large cap parks will likely be ✓ Create direct and indirect jobs pursued at a time due to costs and complexity of these projects ✓ Large park proposals appeal to a much x May expose park users to: 1) potential broader audience than smaller projects health risks related to air quality and noise; ✓ Build on successes of cap parks developed and 2) potential safety risks since pedestrian elsewhere access to cap parks may be dangerous X Cap parks may be taken over by the homeless Pros Capping segments of freeways is a good way to create large new parks in urban areas where vacant land is scarce. It is very difficult, if not impossible, to acquire and assemble several acres of land in densely populated areas to create new parks. Major challenges include the high cost of land acquisition and community opposition, especially when displacement of residences and/or 13 More information regarding the Cornfield and Taylor Yard are provided in Arnold (2007)'s Fair and Healthy Land Use: Environmental Justice and Planning, pp. 112-113. 14 Davies, V. (2008, August). A "Central Park" for Los Angeles? Urban Land, 67(8), pp. 42-45. About 16 acres of the park district would be a cap over the 101 Freeway. 15 Hollywood Chamber of Commerce. (2007). Fact Sheet: Hollywood Freeway Central Park. 16 Crompton, J.L. (2001). Parks and economic development. businesses is necessary. Cap parks provide a viable and superior alternative because the land or space above the freeway may be free, made available as air rights by the agency responsible for the freeway. By building on unused space over freeways, creation of cap parks will also not displace residences or businesses and can reconnect neighborhoods or communities divided by freeways. Large cap parks have the potential to generate economic benefits, including enhanced values to adjacent properties, attraction of businesses and visitors, and creation of new jobs. An example is Hance Park in Phoenix which is surrounded by a growing number of upscale condominium towers. Large park proposals also appeal to a much broader audience than smaller projects. Political and business leaders are particularly eager to advocate for and support visions of large new parks. Such parks would not only meet recreational needs, but also help to upgrade or improve the image of cities. Millennium Park, for example, has elevated the status of Chicago and may be considered to be the city's most important project since the World's Columbian Exposition of 1893." Los Angeles has the benefit of learning from the experiences of other cities where cap parks have been built. The four examples studied in this paper offer insights as to the potential benefits and challenges with the implementation of cap park projects of varying sizes at diverse locations. Cons Construction costs are high for cap parks, especially large ones. The State of New Jersey, for example, spent $150 million on the 6.5 -acre South River Walk Park. Not surprisingly, the proposed 44 -acre Hollywood Central Park has a price tag of nearly $1 billion. Operation and maintenance costs will also be significant for large cap parks given their size and amenities. Time and process required for cap park development will be lengthy. Feasibility, environmental, economic, and other studies must be completed before actual construction begins. During the construction phase, delays can also occur, as evidenced by Boston's now infamous "Big Dig" project also known as the Rose Kennedy Greenway. In addition, only one large cap park will likely be pursued at a time in a region due to the costs and complexity of these projects. It is unclear, for instance, whether the Hollywood Central Park and PARK 101 can occur simultaneously as both will impact traffic on the 101 Freeway. Cap parks may expose park users to potential health risks related to air quality and noise. Studies have shown both the adverse health impacts of living in close proximity to freeways and of driving in long tunnels due to exposure to poor air quality.'$ Also, noise is an issue of concern, especially in smaller cap parks. In addition, potential safety risks exist if access to cap parks is not properly designed to protect pedestrians from vehicular traffic around the parks. Like any park, cap parks may be subject to problems relating to crime and homelessness, if not properly managed and improved over time. For example, at one point Seattle's Freeway Park fell into disuse, resulting in the park becoming a place where crime occurred regularly and where the homeless took over. "The 24.5 -acre Millennium Park is not a freeway cap park, but is similar in that covers land previously occupied by rail yards and parking lots. Please visit http://www.miIlenniumpark.org/parkhistory/ for more information. 18 Please refer to sources cited later on page 18 of this policy paper. E:3 4. EXAMPLES OF EXISTING FREEWAY CAP PARKS A 2007 Trust for Public Land (TPL) study found that there are over 20 cap parks in the United States and at least a dozen more in various stages of planning.19 The average size of the country's cap parks is nine acres and each covers an average of 1,620 linear feet of highway. Summarized in Table 4 and described below are four examples of completed cap parks. Table 4: Examples of Cap Parks Park Name Freeway Park South River Walk Park Hance Park Rose Kennedy Greenway Location Seattle, WA Trenton, NJ Phoenix, AZ Boston, MA Tunnel Length (linear feet) 528 898 2,640 5,280 Park Size (acres) 5.2 6.5 10.0 30.0 Highway 1-5 U.S. 29 1-10 1-93 Source: Harnik, 2010. Freeway Park (5.2 acres) Seattle, Washington Seattle's Freeway Park was created to draw together city neighborhoods divided by Interstate 5.20 When Freeway Park was completed in 1976, it was hailed as a major architectural and engineering accomplishment. Designed by the world-renowned firm of Lawrence Halprin & Associates, it was the first park to be constructed over a freeway. The idea for a downtown park over the freeway is as old as the Seattle segment of Interstate 5 itself. In 1966 civic - minded individuals and the city, county, and state officials were already talking about constructing a cap over the below -grade portion separating First Hill from downtown. The park was developed with bond money, as well as county, state and federal funding. Figure 3: Freeway Park Freeway Park is intended to provide a gathering Source: http://www.bing.com/maps/ place for residents, shoppers, downtown office workers, hotel visitors, and the rest of the downtown population. Initially, the park was actively programmed with lunchtime and evening concerts. Over the years, however, as programming became more limited, the park fell into disuse. As the vegetation matured and cut sightlines, the park became darker, more difficult to navigate, and even dangerous. Seattle's growing drug -using 19 Harnik, P. & Welle, B. (2007, April). Nature over traffic. Urban Land, 66(4), p. 102; Harnik, P. (2010). Urban Green: Innovative Parks for Resurgent Cities, pp. 136-137. Other examples of cap parks not covered in this policy paper include: Riverwalk Plaza (Hartford, CT); Memorial Park (La Canada Flintridge, CA); Lytle Park (Cincinnati, OH); Waterside Park (Atlantic City, NJ); Gateway Park (Arlington, VA); Mid -City Bridge Park Deck (San Diego, CA); Capitol Reflecting Pool (Washington, D.C.); 1-95 Park & Memorial Parks (two parks in Philadelphia, PA); Carl Schurz Park (New York); Sam Smith Park (Seattle, WA); and Rose Garden, Lake Place, Cooke Plaza (3 parks in Duluth, MN). 20 http://www.cityofseattle.net/parks/park_detai1.asp?ID=312 17 and drug -selling population, as well as its homeless population, also found a home in Freeway Park. Various physical and other improvements have been made to address these problems. Today, the park is in better shape and well -used by office workers during the day. Acoustics is an issue at Freeway Park. Due in part to its relatively small size (5.2 acres), park users are subject to a constant white noise caused by traffic. While the sound is not obtrusive, it is not minimal either.21 South River Walk Park (6.5 acres) Trenton, New Jersey South River Walk Park is located above the Route 29 tunnel and was gifted to the Mercer County Park Commission in 2004 by the State of New Jersey. 22 The 6.5 -acre park focuses on the history of Trenton and its connection to the Delaware River. The park is home to five arches of materials which represent various eras of the city from pre -revolutionary through the Industrial Revolution to the modern era. The park has hosted many festivals and art fairs as well as weddings, walk-a- thons and family events. The State of New Jersey spent $150 million on the South River Walk Park. According to Trenton Planning Director Andrew Carten, "The project resulted in a significant Figure 4: South River Walk Park spike in interest and sale prices of property. After all, Source: http://www.binq.com/maps/ would you rather look over 600 trucks barreling past every day, or a scenic park and river?" One lot with a value of $120,000 prior to park construction was developed with six housing units that sold for $200,000 each. The park also helped attract a new 82 -unit market -rate residential development.23 Figure 5: Hance Park Hance Park (10 acres) Phoenix, Arizona Opened in 1992, the Margaret T Hance Park is located in central Phoenix. The park is built on top of the 1-10 tunnel and is named after Margaret T. Hance, former mayor of Phoenix. The park is home to the a Japanese Tea House and Friendship --� Garden, the Irish Cultural Center, and _ 1T the annual St. Patrick's Day Irish Family Faire. i Source: http://www.bing.com/maps/ 21 Harnik, P. (2010). Urban Green: Innovative Parks for Resurgent Cities, p. 138. 22 http://www.state.nj.us/counties/mercer/commissions/park/miIlyard.htm1 23 Harnik, P. (2010). Urban Green: Innovative Parks for Resurgent Cities, p. 139. 24 http://phoenix.about.com/library/blmaphancedeckpark.htm 10 At ten acres, Hance Park is not as impacted by noise or acoustic issues as Seattle's Freeway Park. Labeled by the Phoenix New Times "a rare Phoenix instance of nature over traffic—in this case, literally," Hance Park is decked over the Papago Freeway, uniting uptown and downtown and providing a park next to the central library. The freeway was originally planned as an elevated bridge through downtown, but community opposition killed that idea in a 1973 ballot measure. It was not until ten years later that the city finally accepted a below -grade solution with the park as a key added amenity. As a sign of its success, the park has spurred efforts to revitalize the surrounding downtown area, including construction of market rate and affordable housing and the expansion and/or renovation of local museums.25 Rose Kennedy Greenway (30 acres) Boston, Massachusetts Opened in 2008, the Rose Kennedy Greenway is a roughly 1.5 -mile -long series of parks and public spaces created in downtown Boston.26 It is the final part of the massive Central Artery/Tunnel Project (CA/T) or Big Dig that put 1-93 underground and removed the elevated freeway that served as the main highway through downtown for more than 40 years. The Greenway was named in honor of Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy and officially dedicated in 2004. Officials originally predicted a 2005 completion date for the park components of the Greenway. However, due to numerous delays, cost overruns, and the Big Dig ceiling collapse, the parks were not completed until 2007. As the Greenway runs above an interstate highway, the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority retains Figure 6: Rose Kennedy Greenway ownership of most of the land. The non-profit Rose Source: http://www.bing.com/maps/ Fitzgerald Kennedy Greenway Conservancy has been created jointly by the Turnpike Authority, the City of Boston, and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts to oversee maintenance, fundraising, and programming of the Greenway parks. The $14 -billion price tag of the CA/T has caused some people to question the financial feasibility of cap parks. However, it should be noted that this was primarily a transportation project and included major bridges and underwater tunnels. About $40 million (of the $14 billion) was actually spent on the mile -long stretch of the four parks that make up the Greenway.27 5. CURRENT STATUS OF PROPOSED CAP PARKS IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY Civic and business leaders, planners, and architects have proposed several cap parks in Los Angeles County. Los Angeles seems ideal for new cap parks. Its extensive network of freeways, including numerous below -grade segments, translates to various locations that may be capped with new parks. The region's four major cap park proposals are summarized in Table 5. 25 AECOM. (2010, August). PARK 101 District Feasibility Study, p. 4-8. 26 http://www.rosekennedygreenway.org/ 27 Harnik, P. (2010). Urban Green: Innovative Parks for Resurgent Cities, pp. 139-140. 11 + � o 4A R o. -9 tiR �, 16,71- �:� -7rt • - ` � - ?.. - � a -,, Vk - ra+p .6... t + o-", ownership of most of the land. The non-profit Rose Source: http://www.bing.com/maps/ Fitzgerald Kennedy Greenway Conservancy has been created jointly by the Turnpike Authority, the City of Boston, and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts to oversee maintenance, fundraising, and programming of the Greenway parks. The $14 -billion price tag of the CA/T has caused some people to question the financial feasibility of cap parks. However, it should be noted that this was primarily a transportation project and included major bridges and underwater tunnels. About $40 million (of the $14 billion) was actually spent on the mile -long stretch of the four parks that make up the Greenway.27 5. CURRENT STATUS OF PROPOSED CAP PARKS IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY Civic and business leaders, planners, and architects have proposed several cap parks in Los Angeles County. Los Angeles seems ideal for new cap parks. Its extensive network of freeways, including numerous below -grade segments, translates to various locations that may be capped with new parks. The region's four major cap park proposals are summarized in Table 5. 25 AECOM. (2010, August). PARK 101 District Feasibility Study, p. 4-8. 26 http://www.rosekennedygreenway.org/ 27 Harnik, P. (2010). Urban Green: Innovative Parks for Resurgent Cities, pp. 139-140. 11 Table 5: Major Cap Park Proposals in Los Angeles County Cap Park Proposal Hollywood Central PARK 101 Santa Monica Cap Parks Park Location/Freeway Hollywood Downtown L.A. Santa Monica Santa Monica Above the 101 Freeway Above the 101 Freeway, Above the 10 Above the 10 between Sunset & between Union Station and Freeway, Freeway, Hollywood Boulevard Grand Avenue between between 14th Ocean Avenue & 17th Streets & 4th Street Park Size 44 acres 16 acres above freeway; 5 acres 7 acres 100 acres total Total Cost $950 million $328 million for the cap above $87 million To be freeway determined Sources: AECOM, 2010; V. Davies, 2010; City of Santa Monica, 2010. Figure 7 identifies the location of the proposed cap parks in relation to those neighborhoods with limited access to parks or other open space as identified by the Trust for Public Land. Figure 7: Major Cap Park Proposals in Los Angeles County r � - Hollywood Ic Central Park t _ } Is k •� . x,71 _ _ if Ij I� s t4i� Santa Monica Cap Parks 1 _ sr - -7 kY Sources: Trust for Public Land, 2004; AECOM, 2010; City of Santa Monica, 2010. 12 Hollywood Central Park The Hollywood Central Park proposal is the construction of a cap over the U.S. 101 Freeway, between Hollywood and Santa Monica Boulevards, as the freeway travels below grade through the heart of Hollywood. By capping a portion of the Hollywood Freeway, this project will create a much-needed street -level 44 -acre public park in one of the lowest resident -to -park space communities in California. Hollywood has 0.005 acres of open space per resident as compared to 0.012 acres within the City of Los Angeles. In addition, the project would reunite diverse communities and dense neighborhoods, separated for more than 50 years, by the Hollywood Freeway. Figure 8: Hollywood Central Park Source: http://www.hollywoodfreewaycentralpark.org/ At 44 acres, the park is a large project with the potential to strengthen the economy through job creation, increased tourism, and enhanced property values around the park. The park would also encourage participation in physical exercise and provide green open space and recreational facilities to more than 40,000 children, a majority of who live in apartments. From a traffic engineering standpoint, the project would also be desirable because it would: make long -needed ramp improvements; streamline freeway functioning; and improve freeway overpasses. Of the four cap park proposals in Los Angeles County, the Hollywood Central Park is the furthest along; AECOM completed a feasibility study for this project in 2008. The Friends of Hollywood Central Park has been very active in its efforts to make the park a reality, including lobbying political leaders at all levels, raising support and funds, and coordinating with Caltrans on the required environmental impact studies. The group has even retained a consultant to provide a preliminary study on the Hollywood Central Park's potential return on investment. PARK 101 PARK 101 was initially the vision of a group of college students from around the world who participated in EDAW Inc.'s Intern Program in June 2008.28 The interns were asked this question: "How can we reconnect the City's historic core north of the Hollywood Freeway with the civic, cultural and financial centers to the south?" Their solution, PARK 101, is a vision for a 100 -acre urban park district serving downtown and adjacent neighborhoods such as Chinatown and Little Tokyo, all of which lack adequate open space. It would involve building a 16 -acre cap above a portion of the Hollywood Freeway and its exit ramps. This proposal would also incorporate nearby parking lots and underused land next to the freeway, and reconfigure the Civic Center area— converting an eyesore into an urban park and a walkable, vibrant neighborhood. This project provides a unique opportunity to shape a new direction for downtown. Focused on a relatively small area straddling the 101 Freeway and situated in an existing maze of roadways, 28 EDAW is now a part of AECOM (http://www.aecom.com/), an international provider of professional technical and management support services to a broad range of markets, including transportation, facilities, environmental, energy, water and government. 13 PARK 101 can remake Los Angeles into a more sustainable and livable city. According to AECOM, the PARK 101 proposal focuses on six design principles: maximizing regional connectivity; developing a pedestrian focus; providing flexibility of open space; reconnecting communities; being a regenerative tool; and creating a "Wow" factor. PARK 101 is not just a cap over a Figure 9: PARK 101 District freeway. Proponents of PARK 101 envision a new park district that mends the fragmentation of the City's central core. The design of the park is based on the extension and intersection of disconnected street grids on both sides of the freeway, as well as the opportunities inherent at Union Station and its future high speed rail component. The points of intersections and the axial vistas connecting key landmarks such as the Cathedral of Our Lady of the Angels, Union Station, and the Los Angeles River generate a series of links that create shapes for different programmatic components, and create the alignments and forms that give shape to the park. Source: AECOM, 2010. The vision of PARK 101 will be very costly to realize: $328 million for the cap park portion alone.29 However, the project will be built in five phases and will offer adjacent "value creation opportunities" in the form of new real estate developments that create value where it does not currently exist. A feasibility study by AECOM indicates that every dollar of the public investment in PARK 101 would spur $1.25 in new private development, which is not otherwise likely to occur.so Anticipated new development in the Park sub -district includes an estimated 1.0 to 1.9 million square feet of hotel, office, and retail space and 600 to 800 new residential units worth an additional $490 million. In addition to 2,800 to 3,500 one-time construction jobs, the PARK 101 district is expected to create 2,800 to 6,000 new permanent jobs. Santa Monica Cap Parks The City of Santa Monica is proposing to cap two portions of the 10 Freeway: between Ocean Avenue and 4th Street and between 14th and 17th Streets. The first project would tie together Main Street with downtown Santa Monica, while the second would function as a green space near 14th and 17th Streets. According to city staff, momentum is building for both projects. 29 According to AECOM (2010), the total estimated cost of the infrastructure investment for the PARK 101 district is approximately $825 million, and is distributed among the three sub -areas: $385 million for the Park Sub -District (includes the cap park component); $300 million for the Station Sub -District; and $135 million for the River Sub -District. s0 AECOM. (2010, August). PARK 101 District Feasibility Study, p. 1-11. 14 Between Ocean Avenue and 4th Street: As part of the city's implementation of the Civic Center Specific Plan, this capping project would extend the McClure Tunnel and cover the 10 Freeway from 4th Street to Ocean Avenue, offering an enlarged green space for outdoor enjoyment. The five - acre freeway cap would improve connection between downtown Santa Monica and the Civic Center. Specifically, the cap would improve public access to the new Palisades Garden Walk and Town Square Project. With an Expo Line light rail station at Colorado Avenue and 4th Street scheduled to be completed by 2015, the project could also enhance walkability by providing a pedestrian connection between Third Street Promenade, Santa Monica Place, and Main Street. A preliminary study indicates that the project would cost about $87 million. AECOM is currently completing a full feasibility study for this project.31 Figure 10: Cap Park at Ocean Avenue/4th Street Sources: City of Santa Monica, 2010; The LookOut news, 2010. Between 14th and 17th Streets: This seven -acre cap park is envisioned as an opportunity to expand open space, explore joint development, and reconnect neighborhoods that were broken by the construction of the freeway. This park would also be located near the future Expo Line station at Memorial Park, which is located on Olympic Boulevard between 14" and 16th Streets, just north of the freeway. The proposed park would reconnect the Pico neighborhood to the larger city fabric. The City received $250,000 in grant money from Caltrans to complete a feasibility study for this cap project. This study is one component of planning for the area which will include the Memorial Park Master Plan, the Expo light rail station area planning, and a future specific plan for the district as proposed in the city's Land Use and Circulation Element. 6. IMPLEMENTATION Funding Construction costs for large cap parks can be very high, as evidenced by the expected price tag of the Hollywood Central Park. Some may argue that numerous existing parks may be improved or upgraded using $950 million - the estimated cost of creating the Hollywood Central Park (not including any land acquisition costs). However, the land or space above the freeway may be free, made available as air rights by Caltrans. This can translate to a multimillion -dollar gift in urban locations. For example, land costs approximately $2 million to $3 million per acre near the Santa Ana Freeway by the Los Angeles City Hall.32 There would be no land costs if Caltrans agrees to 31 The City Council and Redevelopment Agency authorized the execution of a reimbursement agreement, in an amount not to exceed $3,156,508, using redevelopment funds to pay for costs associated with the freeway capping feasibility study, including engineering and constructability analysis, and the preparation of options for connecting the Civic Center and downtown over the freeway. 32 Harnik, P. & Welle, B. (2007, April). Nature over traffic. Urban Land, 66(4), p. 103. 15 make air rights above freeways available. This is not unlikely considering that Caltrans has identified itself as a key stakeholder involved in making PARK 101 a reality.33 In addition, there are various sources of local, state, and federal funds that can be obtained, particularly if an economic analysis shows that associated development will generate significantly more tax revenue. One approach is to create a tax increment financing district, whereby future increased tax revenue is used to pay back the costs of the park. The PARK 101 proposal, for example, is expected to offer adjacent "value creation opportunities" in the form of new real estate developments: the project is expected to spur $1.25 in new private development for every dollar of public investment. The project may also receive funding created to mitigate impacts related to the future development of high speed rail. Other local funding sources include public works capital funds or municipal bonds. The federal or state government often pays for the deck superstructure, while the city finances the actual park development. For example, the Trenton deck for the South River Walk Park came about through reconstruction of a state highway and was paid for by the State of New Jersey.34 Construction of large cap parks must be done in phases, as proposed for both the Hollywood Central Park and PARK 101. Incremental development allows park developers to build on early successes and to secure funding over a longer period of time. This approach also minimizes disruption to traffic and circulation during the construction period. Another aspect of funding is the cost of operating and maintaining the parks. While local parks and recreation departments are typically responsible for operation and maintenance, it would be beneficial to create a non-profit management organization for each large cap park. For instance, the non-profit Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy Greenway Conservancy was created to oversee maintenance, fundraising, and programming of the Greenway parks. Stakeholder Engagement The development of cap parks involves and affects a broad range of stakeholders: Residents in Underserved These residents live in communities without sufficient places to recreate and Communities, especially do not have the means to reach parks and school fields in other Children neighborhoods. They are the intended beneficiaries of strategies to increase the supply of parks in underserved neighborhoods. Business Interests Business interests support large urban parks with the potential to generate economic benefits: enhancing real estate values, attracting tourists and businesses, and creating jobs. For example, the Hollywood Chamber of Commerce is the key proponent of the Hollywood Central Park. Transportation Officials Transportation officials play a critical role in the development of cap parks because these parks would be developed above segments of freeways under their control. Caltrans is a key partner in all four cap park proposals. Local and State Politicians Local and state political representatives play a key role by advocating for new parks and securing funding for their development. For example, city, county, and state officials worked together to create Vista Hermosa Park, downtown's first new public park in many years .35 To be implemented, any new strategy to create new parks requires the backing of political leaders. 33 http://www.dot.ca.gov/dist07/travel/projects/park101/ 34 Harnik, P. (2010). Urban Green: Innovative Parks for Resurgent Cities, p. 141. 35 Vista Hermosa Park was built on a brownfield in downtown Los Angeles by the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy and the Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority in a joint -use partnership with LAUSD and the City of Los Angeles. The 10.5 -acre park restores some of the natural topography and native 16 Environmental Justice Environmental justice groups are the leaders of the urban parks movement in Groups Los Angeles. They seek to eliminate unfair park, school, and health disparities based on race, ethnicity, poverty, youth, and access to cars. These groups contributed significantly to the development of new parks at the Cornfield and Taylor Yard. Public Health Officials Public health officials generally support the development of new parks because they provide opportunities for physical activity, especially for children. However, public health experts must evaluate the potential health concerns of placing new parks at locations such as above freeways. Local Parks and Local parks and recreation departments provide parks and recreation Recreation Departments services, and will most likely be responsible for the operation and maintenance of any new cap parks, unless new non -profits are created for such purposes. State Parks Department State Parks helped make the new parks at the Cornfield and Taylor Yard and Conservancies possible. The Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy and the Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority contributed to the development of Vista Hermosa Park. All three will continue to partner with local agencies to provide new urban parks. Conservation and These groups support projects that protect and restore the natural Environmental Groups environment. For example, Friends of the Los Angeles River seeks to restore the river's natural habitat and develop bikeways, paths, and trails on the riverbanks. They typically favor passive recreational activities such as hiking, bird watching and nature study. Proper engagement of and cooperation between these stakeholders are critical to the success of the proposed cap parks. It is important to ensure that stakeholders understand the goals and anticipated benefits associated with the proposed parks. There are various forms of engagement and communication, including the community dialogue, news media, and simulation tools, which can provide a better understanding of the proposals, and demonstrate how the parks could impact quality of life and social equity. Political Will and Support Without political will and support, the proposed cap parks would be great ideas left unimplemented. Fortunately, all four projects have their fair share of supporters. The Friends of Hollywood Central Park, for example, has done an outstanding job of outreach and education, as evidenced by the long list of politicians supporting the project.36 PARK 101 is well -supported by public agencies37 and is described briefly in the Central City Community Plan, an official planning document prepared by the Los Angeles City Planning Department. However, the project will require more open and vocal support from one or more political champions to move forward, especially to work with Caltrans to streamline its review and permitting processes. As smaller projects, the Santa Monica cap parks do not require the same level of political support as the Hollywood and PARK vegetation of the area and features trails, streams, meadows, oak savannahs, picnic areas, art elements, an environmentally -themed children's adventure area, and a 120 -student capacity outdoor amphitheater. Built with state-of-the-art "green" technologies, the park enhances environmental and natural history educational opportunities for the adjacent high school, and provides a regulation soccer field for shared use by the school and the community. 36 Politicians include: Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, City Council members Eric Garcetti and Tom LaBonge, Congressman Xavier Becerra, Congresswoman Diane Watson, former State Senator and current County Supervisor Mark Ridley-Thomas, and California Assemblyman Mike Feuer. 37 Including Metro, SCAG, Caltrans, and CRA/LA. 17 101 proposals. Nevertheless, the two parks have received the blessing of city leaders who committed funding to study their feasibility. As of this writing, there are no vocal opponents to the four proposals. Understandably, some may be concerned about the high costs of cap parks and commuters may be uneasy about being stuck in tunnels for lengthy periods during traffic jams.38 Environmental and Public Health Impacts The environmental and public health impacts of the cap park proposals have not yet been comprehensively evaluated as required by California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Unfortunately, the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health also has not conducted any research on the potential public health impacts of cap parks .39 Nevertheless, it is logical to consider that because of their location, the proposed cap parks may expose future park users to potential health threats related to traffic noise and poor air quality. Excessive traffic noise could be an issue, especially for the smaller cap parks proposed in Santa Monica. These parks are similar in size to Seattle's Freeway Park which has some noise/acoustic issues relating to freeway traffic. A University of Southern California study has shown that children living near freeways are more likely to develop asthma and other respiratory problems.40 In addition, a recent study conducted in Sydney, Australia provides evidence that ultrafine particles produced by fuel combustion are lurking inside road tunnels in concentration levels so high they have the potential to harm drivers and passengers .41 However, exposure to air pollutants for a resident next to a freeway or for a driver inside the tunnel is not the same as for a park user above the freeway. Also, by covering segments of freeways, cap parks could possibly limit the amount of air pollutants adjacent residents would be exposed to. Published information, for the most part, indicates that the concentration of most air toxicants detected in communities exposed to tunnel emissions are below those concentrations that are generally considered to pose either a significant acute or chronic health hazard .42 Another environmental issue may be the short-term traffic and air quality impacts associated with the need to transport a significant amount of soil necessary to plant trees and landscaping at the park sites. The long-term air quality and noise impacts can be mitigated to some extent through the design of the parks. Some landscape architects argue that cap parks can mitigate the impacts without relying exclusively on mechanical systems. One idea, for example, is that the Hollywood Central Park could be designed to function as a "breathing apparatus" capable of filtering the carbon monoxide that would be vented out of the tunnel after the capping of the freeway.43 This proposed " Pool, B. (2008, November 19). Plan for park atop Hollywood Freeway is praised. L.A. Times, p. B3. 39 E-mail from Gayle Haberman of the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health received on 6/4/2010. 40 Gauderman, W. J. et al (2007). Effect of exposure to traffic on lung development from 10 to 18 years of age: a cohort study. The Lancet, 368, pp. 535-537. The study, which tracked 3,600 children for 13 years, found that those living within 500 yards of a highway faced risk of permanent health damage, including stunted lung growth and respiratory problems. 41 Queensland University of Technology (2009, August 30). Tunnels Concentrate Air Pollution By Up To 1,000 Times. ScienceDaily. Retrieved June 26, 2010, from http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/08 /090827101241.htm 42 Kuykendall, J.R. et al (2009). Chemicals present in automobile traffic tunnels and the possible community health hazards: A review of the literature. Inhalation Toxicology, 21(9), pp. 747-792. 43 Conversation with Gerdo Aquino of SWA Group on 7/2/2010. Professor Andrea Hricko of USC also expressed concerns about how and where air pollutants would be vented out from the tunnels during our phone conversation on 9/10/2010. 18 design would effectively suck up carbon monoxide from the tunnel and filter it through layers of vegetation on the surface. Some mechanical systems would be required, but the intent is to make visible the process of ventilation while incorporating an active, natural systems -based approach to filter the polluted air from the tunnel.aa From a big picture perspective, cap parks actually have the potential to improve the region's air quality and overall quality of life. In particular, the proposed cap parks are consistent with and help to implement Senate Bill 375 which seeks to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through land use planning. The vehicle for this coordination is a new regional land use plan called a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS). The result is expected to be more rational and coordinated regulation and public funding, which in turn should accelerate the pace at which development consistent with these plans can proceed. The Urban Land Institute (ULI)'s SB 375 Impact Analysis Report specifically points out that state funding priorities need to take into account: 1) SB 375 redirects future growth towards existing urban areas; and 2) in addition to transportation funds, other infrastructure investments such as monies for parks should also be linked to the SCS. Cap parks can also play an important role in the prevention and treatment of obesity. When people have access to parks, they are more likely to exercise, which can reduce obesity and its associated health risks and costs. As mentioned previously (on page 5), a number of studies have shown that enhanced access to places for physical activity produced an increase in the frequency of physical activity. Timing Because of their smaller size, Santa Monica's cap parks will most likely be developed before the proposals in Hollywood and downtown Los Angeles. As large-scale projects, Hollywood Central Park and PARK 101 will require lengthier environmental reviews and permitting processes. However, given the need for these parks, their potential benefits, and consistency with SB 375 goals, one might ask whether these reviews and processes could or should be streamlined or relaxed. 7. CONCLUSION As land has become increasingly scarce in Los Angeles, we need creative and resourceful planning solutions to meet the park and recreational needs of the population. Cap parks offer hope and benefits that simply cannot be ignored. In particular, larger cap parks have the potential to: improve regional air quality; help reduce obesity and its associated problems; create short- and long-term jobs; raise adjacent property values; and enhance the overall quality of life. While they can be costly and complex projects that are challenging to implement, cap parks represent a strategy that must be seriously considered to promote sustainability, address the need for more parkland, and reconnect neighborhoods that have been fragmented as a result of freeway construction. 44 E-mail from Gerdo Aquino of SWA Group on 8/31/2010. 19 REFERENCES AECOM. (2010, August). PARK 101 District Feasibility Study. Retrieved September 15, 2010, from http://www.compassblueprint.org/files/parkl01_report_web.pdf Arnold, C.A. (2007). Fair and healthy land use: environmental justice and planning. Chicago: American Planning Association. Casuso, J. (2009, March 26). Council Explores Big Plans for Civic Center. The LookOut news. Retrieved July 13, 2010, from http://www.surfsantamonica.com/ssm_site/ the lookout/ news/News-2009/March-2009 Crompton, J.L. (2001). Parks and economic development. Chicago: American Planning Association. Davies, V. (2008, August). A "Central Park" for Los Angeles? Urban Land, 67(8), 42-45. Day, K. (2006). Active Living and Social Justice: Planning for Physical Activity in Low-income, Black, and Latino Communities. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(1), 88-99. Di Rado, A. (2005, September 21). Childhood asthma linked to freeway pollution. USC News. Retrieved October 4, 2008, from http://www.usc.edu/uscnews/stories/11614.html DiMassa, C.M. (2009, March 28). Santa Monica considers `capping' freeway. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved March 28, 2009, from http://www.latimes.com/mews/local/la-me-freeway-cap28- 2009mar28,0,6738759.story EDAW/AECOM. (2008, October). Hollywood Freeway Central Park Feasibility Report. Retrieved November 23, 2008, from http://www.hollywoodchamber.net/business/HFCP_ Feasibility_ Report_20081008.pdf Garcia, R. & White, A. (2006). Healthy Parks, Schools, and Communities: Mapping Green Access and Equity for Los Angeles Region. Retrieved October 5, 2008, from http://www.cityprojectca.org/ourwork/mappinggreenaccess/documents/Healthy_Parks_Schools _Communities_textonly.pdf Gauderman, W. J., Vora, H., McConnell, R., Berhane, K., Gilliland, F., Thomas, D., Lurmann, F., Avol, E., Kunzli, N., Jerrett, M., & Peters, J. (2007, February). Effect of exposure to traffic on lung development from 10 to 18 years of age: a cohort study. The Lancet, 368, 535-537. Gies, E. (2006). The Health Benefits of Parks. San Francisco: Trust for Public Land. Harnik, P. (2010). Urban Green: Innovative Parks for Resurgent Cities. Washington: Island Press. Harnik, P. (2000). Inside City Parks. Washington, DC: Urban land Institute. Harnik, P. & Welle, B. (2007, April). Nature over traffic. Urban Land, 66(4), 102-105. Hise, G. & Deverell, W. (2000). Eden by Design: the 1930 Olmsted -Bartholomew Plan for the Los Angeles Region. Berkeley: University of California Press. 20 Hollywood Chamber of Commerce. (2007). Fact Sheet: Hollywood Freeway Central Park. Retrieved October 4, 2008, from http://www.hollywoodfreewaycentralpark.org/ docs/ HFCP_FactSheet.pdf Hyland, A. (2010, April 5). 101 Freeway Park Proposal Ramping Up. Los Angeles Business Journal. Retrieved July 13, 2010, from http://Iabusinessjournal.com/news/2010/apr/05/101- freeway-park-proposal-ramping Kuykendall, J.R., Shaw, S.L., Paustenbach, D., Fehling, K., Kacew, S., & Kabay, V. (2009). Chemicals present in automobile traffic tunnels and the possible community health hazards: A review of the literature. Inhalation Toxicology, 21(9), pp. 747-792. Linton, J. (2010, May 11). Park 101's Freeway Lid for a Walkable Downtown Los Angeles. Streetsblog Los Angeles. Retrieved July 1, 2010, from http://la.streetsbIog.org/ 2010/05/11 park - 101 s-freeway-lid-for-a-walkable-downtown-los-angeles Los Angeles County Department of Public Health. (2007, October). Preventing childhood obesity: the need to create healthy places. Retrieved October 11, 2008, from http://Iapublichealth.org/ wwwfiles/ph/hae/epi/chr2-ch ildhood_obesity. pdf Loukaitou-Sideris, A. & Stieglitz, O. (2002). Children in Los Angeles parks: a study of equity, quality and children's satisfaction with neighborhood parks. Town Planning Review, 73(4), 467- 488. Morris, M. (Ed.). (2006). Integrating planning and public health: tools and strategies to create healthy places. Chicago: American Planning Association. Pool, B. (2008, November 19). Plan for park atop Hollywood Freeway is praised. Los Angeles Times, p. B3. Queensland University of Technology (2009, August 30). Tunnels Concentrate Air Pollution By Up To 1,000 Times. ScienceDaily. Retrieved June 26, 2010, from http://www.sciencedaily.com/ releases/2009/08/090827101241.htm Richardson, E. (2010, May 11). Ambitious Park 101 Project Proposes Small First Step at Union Station. Blogdowntown.com. Retrieved July 2, 2010, from http://blogdowntown.com/ 2010/05/5332 -ambitious -park-101-project-proposes-small Richardson, E. (2010, July 1). Park 101 Costs and Next Steps Outlined by Study. Blogdowntown.com. Retrieved July 2, 2010, from http://blogdowntown.com/2010/07/5469-park- 101-costs-and-next-steps-outlined-by-study Sloane, D.C. (2006). From Congestion to Sprawl: Planning and Health in Historical Context. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(1), 10-18. Sloane, D.C., Nascimento, L., Flynn, G., Lewis, L., Jones Guinyard, J., Galloway -Gilliam, L., Diamant, A., & Yancey, A. (2006). Assessing Resource Environments to Target Prevention Interventions in Community Chronic Disease Control. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 17, 146-159. 21 Taborek, N. (2010, January 16). City Hall to take first step on freeway capping plan. Santa Monica Daily Press. Retrieved July 13, 2010, from http://www.smdp.com Townsend, G. (2010, February 24). Driving Green: LA flush with freeway park proposals. The Architect's Newspaper. Retrieved July 13, 2010, from http://www.archpaper.com/e- board_rev.asp? News-1 D=4275 Trust for Public Land. (2004, November). No place to play: a comparative analysis of park access in seven major cities. Retrieved October 4, 2008, from http://www.tpl.org/tier3_cd.cfm ?content item id=14565&folder id=266 Yanez, E. & Muzzy, W. (2005, October). Heathy Parks, Healthy Communities: Addressing Health Disparities and Park Inequities through Public Financing of Parks, Playgrounds, and Other Physical Activity Settings. San Francisco: Trust for Public Land. 22 ELEVATION 'A' D FLAN ENLARO EMENT @ CLUSTER HOMES SCALE: I'' = IO' -O" ELE\IAT I ON - 'A' SCALE: I" = 101-011 a FLONERINO EVER0REEN OROUND GOBIER: - HE1MEROGALL I S - SENEG10 - ORNAMENTAL O RASSES. EVEROREEN SHRUBS: - ESGALLON I A - L I O USTf;ZUM - f;ZAf:'H I OLEF 15 - GALL I STEMON LOFHOSTEMON FERl ME7ER NA OPEN LA FLAN ENLAROEMENT @ FOGXET i AR< SCALE: I'' = 10'-O" 5ENGH SEA71NO POGKET PA SEE ENLAR 7H 15 SHEE � e 1s --r I .00 1k I 1= SGR�L.t : I " = 10'-0 " SGALF-: I'' = 200'-0" LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENTS - #5 - CLUS'T'ER HOME PRODUCT & POCKET PARK f. CLU57ER HOMES °Irk` TH 1 S SHEET 01\ P �5 P�gJs� PREPARED FOR: OWNER: LENNAR 0 25 ENTERPRISE ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656 (949) 349-8100 PREPARED BY,- ,Mir DESIGN GROUP 31591 Camino Capistrano San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 www.RJMdesigngroup.com [949] 493-2690 fax [949] 493-2600 phone WILL 0 W HEIGHTS TEN TA T1 VE TRACT LAOERSTROMIA INDICA - GRAPE FLOWERIN6, EVERGREEN 5HRUB5 S 6ROUNDOOVER, TYP. SECTION A -A -- TYPIGAL ® 'B' 5TREET SCALE: I" = 10'-0" MASTER PLANT LEGEND SPECIMEN CANOPY TREES HT X WDTH (FT) SHRUBS VINES / ESPALLIERS \ QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA COAST LIVE OAK 40 X 50 a PLATANUS RACEMOSA CALIFORNIA SYCAMORE 40 X 30 EVERGREEN CANOPY TREE AT ENTRY DRIVE 8s 'A' STREET LOPHOSTEMON CONFERTUS BRISBANE BOX 30 X 20 CANOPY TREE AT 'B' STREET LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA CRAPE MYRTLE 20 X 20 COURTYARD / PATIO TREES AGONIS FLEXUOSA PEPPERMINT WILLOW 25 X 20 METROSIDEROS EXCELSIS NEW ZEALAND CHRISTMAS TREE 20 X 15 PRUNUS CAROLINIANA'BRIGHT N TIGHT CAROLINA LAUREL 18X 15 LAGERSTROMIA INDICA CRAPE MYRTLE 20 X 20 LOPHOSTEMON CONFERTUS BRISBANE BOX 30 X 20 RHUS LANCEA AFRICAN SUMAC 20 X 20 CUPRESSUS SEMPERVIRENS VONSHEL' DWARF ITALIAN CYPRESS 15 X 5 OLEA EUROPA'LITTLE OLLIE' FRUITLESS OLIVE 5 X 3 RHAPIOLEPIS INDICA INDIA HAWTHORN 6 X 3 ARBUTUS X'MARINA' STRAWBERRY TREE 20X 18 SLOPE / OPEN SPACE TREES PLATANUS RACEMOSA CALIFORNIA SYCAMORE 40X 30 QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA COAST LIVE OAK 40 X 50 LOPHOSTEMON CONFERTUS BRISBANE BOX 30 X 20 AGONIS FLEXUOSA PEPPERMINT WILLOW 25 X 20 MELALEUCA QUINQUENERVIA PAPERBARK TREE 25 X 28 (OVERALL TREE PLANTING SHALL PROVIDE FOR A MIN. OF 20% 24" BOX; 80% 15 GAL.) INTERLOUGIN6 CONCRETE F (TUMBLED, THREE -COLOR B i POCKET PARK A60NI5 FLEXU05A - PEPPERMINT WILLOW LOPHOSTEMON CONFERTUS - BRI5BANE BOX FLOWERIN6,EVER6REEN 5HRUB5 4 6ROUNDG0VER, TYP. TUBULAR 5TEEL 5LIDIN6 :L ENTRY 6ATE5, TYP. _ Jam` 1 i kW 7 ii a: \ SECTION B -S -- ENTRY DRIVE 4 GATES 50ALE: P = I0'-0" LOPH05TEMON CONFERTUS - BRISBANE FLOWERING, EVERGREEN 514RUB5 4 6ROUNDG0VER, TYP. l I SECTION C -e, -- TYPICAL ® 'A' STREET SCALE: P = 10'-0" J LIGUSTRUM J. TEXANUM' TEXAS PRIVET DISTICTUS SP. TRUMPET VINE \ RHAMNUS C.'LITTLE SUR' COFFEEBERRY JASMINUM MESNYI PRIMROSE JASMINE \ — RAPHIOLEPIS INDICA RHAPHIOLEPIS GELSEMIUM SEMPERVIRENS CAROLINA JESSAMINE PRUNUS CAROLINIANA'BRIGHT'N TIGHT' CAROLINA CHERRY MANDEVILLA HYBRIDS MANDEVILLA -A BUXUS JAPONICA JAPANESE BOXWOOD TRACHELOSPERMUM JASMINOIDES STAR JASMINE XYLOSMA CONGESTUM SHINEY XYLOSMA CALLIANDRA CALIFORNICA BAJA FAIRY DUSTER ESCALLONIASP. ESCALLONIA �� / / 93 82 ELEAGNUS PUNGENS SILVERBERRY (PLANTING SHALL PROVIDE FOR A MIN. OF 80% 5 GAL.; 20% 15 GAL.) \ �, \ 87 CALLISTEMON 'LITTLE JOHN' DWARF CALLISTEMON MYRTUS COMMUNIS MYRTLE �'+ WESTRINGIA FRUTICOSA COAST ROSEMARY //U(T No. 2591 BOUGAINVILLEASP.'OO-LA-LA' PROSTRATE BOUGAINVILLEA 13 M.B. 702 PG,S 16 TO 21 \ (PLANTING SHALL PROVIDE FOR A MIN. OF 70% 5 GAL.; 30% 1 GAL.) / 82 66 6 \ GROUNDCOVERS / 92 � i MYOPORUM P.'PUTAH CREEK' MYOPORUM � A TRACHELOSPERMUM JASMINOIDES STAR JASMINE a \� \ \\ 83 \ \ 85 MUEHLENBERGIA RIGENS DEERGRASS BACCHARIS P.'PIGEON POINT' DWARF COYOTE BUSH 6 HEMEROCALLIS HYBRIDS DAYLILLY CEANOTHUS SP. CEANOTHUS ACACIA REDOLENS ACACIA 15 \ C, SA 1 i SENECIO SERPENS SENECIO 2 / ' PACHYSANDRA TERMINALIS JAPANESE SPURGE (PLANTING SHALL PROVIDE FOR 100% COVERAGE WITHIN 2 YEARS) / \ MAIN ENTRY S GATES (SEE ELEVATION) TRACT No. 25991 TRACT Ro. 33417 M.B. 702, PGS 16 TO 21 M.B. 909, PG 7 T07739 v a 4 5TREET50APE DESIGN (SHALL CONFORM TO CITY'S 5TREET5GAPE 'r ' DESIGN STANDARDS AND BE IRRIGATED 1a \ �`♦ 1 %SEPARATELY FROM DEVELOPMENT)rp. ¢, A ENTRY MONUMENT?,TI ON \ 000�� (SEE ELEVATION PER • v�' r - / ENLARGEMENTS) oN i (SEE ENLARGEMENT) as HOA SLOPE ® DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (SEE ENLARGEMENT) I�� d ✓ CITY GAS//WAY ENTRY MONUMENTATION (PER FUTURE CITY STREET5GAPE DESIGN STANDARDS) PARK EVEL PMEN (UNDER SEPARATE GONTRAGT) P 11111- �00 1' l v l pp S 1 I \ \ 15 \ 14 \ NEI61450RHOOD CANOPY TREE ®'B' STREET (SEE LEGEND) 13 \ \ 'VERDURA" PLANTED RETAINING NALL, TYP. \ 12 \ TRACT o &2x74 M.B. 873, GS 50 TO'6— 5LOPE / OPEN 5PAGE TREE5 (5EE LEGEND 4: — —ENLARGEMENTS) 6 4 NEIGHBORHOOD CANOPY TREE �I ® A STREET (SEE LEGEND) 14hgeAAlN UARDEIV /' AIjtU SIN `/ I ' 1 1 2 'YERDURA' PLANTED RET. WALL (SEE ENLARGEMENT) 76 TOWNHOUSE (SEE ENLARGEMENT) ! �� : 4 OPEN 5PAGE / SLOPE PLNT6. (SEE ENLARGEMENT) 6 TRACT No, 27577 39 M.B. 702 PGS 22 TO 25 �� \ \\ EXISTING!,�p�C�^%', . \ 55 ESM 38 \ j. ' h I 27 , 10 29 26 / 30 -�v „TRA xT No. 341\6\0 \ V / 31 / � 111 �� ,� FM, \. B. 900,\PGS 20 TO 25 25 \ / i 32 / ti 2p \ SECTION D -D -- TYPICAL PEDESTRIAN GROSSING a 'B' STREET SCALE: I" = 10'-0" CLUSTER PRODUCT \ 1 \ (SEE ENLARGEMENT) / 33 / A , ''Ie / 34 / `\ _ - / 1 ' \ �PEDE5TRIAN GROSSING TRACT No. 25989 /3513 � � .. A A /f M.B. 714, PGS 5 TO 7 ,� v / \ \ 14 37 PARK DEVELOPMENT i 36 15 (UNDER SEPARATE CONTRACT) \ O \ LANDSCAPE CONCEPT STATEMENT QQ`� 19 \ THE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER IN THE EXISTING SITE IS CHARACTERIZED BY ITS EXISTING OAKS, SYCAMORE, EUCALYPTUS, WILLOWS. THESE REGIONAL MATERIALS CONTRIBUTE TO THE UNDERSTATED RANCH -STYLE CHARACTER OF THE COMMUNITY. THE LANDSCAPE CONCEPT FOR THE WILLOW HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WILL PROVIDE FOR A LANDSCAPE PALETTE CONSISTENT WITH THIS EXISTING SITE CHARACTER AND SENSE OF PLACE. THE PROPOSED PLANT PALETTE UTILIZES OAKS AND SYCAMORES AS FOCAL AND OPEN SPACE PLANTINGS. LOCATED AT THE PROJECT ENTRY AS WELL AS WITHIN SLOPE PLANTINGS, THESE TREES WILL PROVIDE FOR LARGE SCALE CANOPY TREES CONSISTENT WITH THE SITE'S CHARACTER. BRISBANE BOX, PEPPERMINT WILLOW AND CRAPE MYRTLE WILL BE UTILIZED ALONG STREETSCAPES AND PEDESTRIAN PASEOS TO RETAIN THE OVERALL RURAL CHARACTER OF THE DEVELOPMENT. UNDERSTORY PLANTINGS OF EVERGREEN FLOWERING SHRUBS AND GROUND COVERS WILL COMPLEMENT THE PALETTE OF CANOPY TREES AND HELP TO DEFINE EACH PROJECT AREA'S UNIQUE SENSE OF PLACE. HARDSCAPE MATERIALS WILL BE SELECTED THAT ARE RANCH -LIKE IN THEIR APPEAL AND CHARACTER. VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN PAVING WILL BE ENHANCED WITH ACCENTS OF TUMBLED, INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE PAVERS. SITE WALLS AND FENCING WILL BE DETAILED WITH MATERIALS THAT PRESENT A'WARM' COLOR RANGE AND RELATE TO THE EARTH TONES OF THE SURROUNDING LANDSCAPE. THE COLLECTIVE PALETTE OF PLANTINGS AND HARDSCAPE MATERIALS WILL REMAIN CONSISTENT WITH AND COMPLEMENT THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR'S INHERENT CHARACTER AND AUTHENTICITY. Is TREE MITIGATION/REPLACEMENT PROGRAM THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT REQUIRES THE REMOVAL OF ALL 75 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BLACK WALNUT, SIX WILLOW, AND TWO COAST LIVE OAK TREES. A MINIMUM OF 250 NEW TREES WILL BE PROVIDED IN RESPONSE TO THE CITY'S EXISTING TREE MITIGATION PROGRAM. THESE PROPOSED REPLACEMENT TREES ARE AS NOTED BELOW: EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED: 75 - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BLACK WALNUT 6- WILLOW 2 - COAST LIVE OAK 83 TOTAL EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED MITIGATION REPLACEMENT RATIO: 3:1 83X3 = 249 REPLACEMENT TREES REQUIRED PROPOSED REPLACEMENT TREES: 75 - COAST LIVE OAK 174 - SYCAMORE SP. " 249 TOTAL PROPOSED REPLACEMENT TREES ** THESE TREES WILL BE PROVIDED AT BOTH THE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND THE PROPOSED PARK SITES (50/50 SPLIT) ** ET 0 30 60 120 0 1/2 1 2 PREPARED FOR: OWNER: LENNARa 25 ENTERPRISE ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656 (949) 349-8100 PREPARED BY.• 01 R A GROIUP 31591 Camino Capistrano San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 w .RlMdesigngmup.00m 19491493-2690fax 19491493-2600 phone W/LL O W HE/CRTs PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN 12 of 71 VEST/NG TENTATIVE TRACT 72295 7.31.13 WALL AND LANDSCAPE RJM DATE REVISION BY PREPARED BY.• 01 R A GROIUP 31591 Camino Capistrano San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 w .RlMdesigngmup.00m 19491493-2690fax 19491493-2600 phone W/LL O W HE/CRTs PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN 12 of 71 VEST/NG TENTATIVE TRACT 72295 PROJECT PROF/LES (VERTICAL & HORIZONTAL SCALE: V" 60') VIEW PROFILE #1 VIEW PROFILE #4 LEGEND - NATURAL GROUND DESIGN GROUND 2 PROPOSED GRADING Boo- 760- 720- 680- 640 oo760720680640 s0o BDo- -760 760- 720 USED NING WALL PROJECT BOUNDARY LINE -Boo LOT LINE - - EASEMENT LINE CENTERLINE OPOSE E WALLA" �W PROPOSED WATER s PROPOSED SEWER 720 LP PROPOSED ST. BY > WIN XISTIN k=pl ml ,� lo°e \ -------------------------------- OPOSE " 8" ST. P !OPOSED -------------- 6.0' PRO SED ADE 00 Lots -' PROPO ED GRADE EME PROPOSED Lot 10 SE WA L BLVD. --- A" ST. Pad 7082' ( - EXI TING G DE ---- vmt m - LI 1 1 Lot 1 EXIS ING GRADE _ o Lot 39 - - PR POSED MSE WALL \ Pad=771 PROP A" SED T ad=774.. Lot 2 'P - ----------- ------- rypi -_- S. DIAMOND BAR -'- OPOSE Pa =727"5 PROPOSED "A" BLVD. Lot 4 PacII25' Pa Lot 14 "B"ST. p pi _ Lot S . �> R P PR SED PR P SED AINING WALL ��\-p OPOSE RETAIN NG W PR L POSED GRADE mi0i kp f PRO OSED ACCESS AC ESS ACC S Lot O ROPOSD MSE ALL --- ---_ ---- ---- ---- - -- _ ---- ---- ---- ---- ------------- ---- > STING a ARK XIS ---- --------- d=7083 Pad- 08.6' pad=7 7.8* Pad= 07.4' BREA BREA RAIN RDEN P (STING GROUN g N. RD. HA PARK ASIN Lot 1 L t 1 Lot L 1 p s0o BDo- -760 760- 720 - 840 USED NING WALL PROJECT BOUNDARY LINE -Boo LOT LINE - - EASEMENT LINE CENTERLINE OPOSE E WALLA" �W PROPOSED WATER s PROPOSED SEWER 720 LP PROPOSED ST. BY > WIN XISTIN k=pl ml ,� lo°e \ -------------------------------- OPOSE " 8" ST. P !OPOSED -------------- 6.0' PRO SED ADE 00 Lots -' el EME PRIC Lot 10 - 840 USED NING WALL PROJECT BOUNDARY LINE -Boo LOT LINE - - EASEMENT LINE CENTERLINE OPOSE E WALLA" �W PROPOSED WATER s PROPOSED SEWER 720 LP 720 T 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 SD PROPOSED STORM DRAIN 5RWL RETAINING WALL/ 680 RETAINING WALL HEIGHT TOP OF SLOPE V -DITCH 640 Trr?ACT ATO. 2il5DDi MSE WALL 40 80 120 760 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680 720 760 800 840 880 920 960 7000 7040 7080 1120 7760 7200 7240 1280 7320 1360 7400 7440 7480 7520 7560 1600 \ / ':\ \ A VIEW PROFILE #2 ° — — — / PROPOSED 8' _ � Y ° / SIDEWALK d % VICINITY MAP - - - - NATURAL GROUND PROPOSED GRADING \\ \ EX. POWER POLE 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK -_ 800 \ \ tT TO BE RELOCATED �// 160- 720 680 ENHANCED PAVEMENT NOTES 760\ / \�\ AREA TO BE DEDICATED TO 1. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 8714-002-900, 8714-002-901, 8714-002-902, /A �\ O EX R/w THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 8714-002-903 AND 8714-015-901. A EX. CURB � � g g, Aa V o1T0 o A \/ ,A PROPOSED CURB 720 \ \ / \ `\\ / o PROPOSED R/W r� �� ^� �zR/N' \ ^ i i \� Cut 2 EXISTING &PROPOSED ZONING: SITE D SPECIFIC PLAN \\�EXIS77NG 8" SEI}ER/ \ \ \\\ .�� / \ y/ $ - / l Fill C ILL LINE 3. EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT I / I UT F r \ / EX SIGNAGE 70 BE _ 41 \ /+Tvq / l \ \ \ \ �/ / TO BE RELOCiATE�D 13y p W6 \�\ ! l e I 4. PROPOSED LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL 680 \ �.i / e �t9 r yJ l �\... F. H. FIRE HYDRANT \ y g /^N Z \ 5. EXISTING & PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN: SPECIFIC PLAN, SITE D. 0 40 80 120 180 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680 720 760 800 840 880 920 960 1000 1040 1080 1120 CONNECT 70 r EX. 10" ACP WATER - j8 -j \'$ G, ' 13p 135 24 \\\ TFlrl rT /id ;�z�SEWER DRAIN LOW PLOW 7i 1 6. ALL STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND GRADING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE �, / VIEW PROFILE #3 \ / m \� EXIS NG $" -SEWER /`,BPR r ` psl \\ 1\\ x A s WITH DIAMOND BAR STANDARDS, ORDINANCES AND APPROVED MODIFICATIONS HERETO. / A w p 5 RT a \ d Iva, 87'3, PIGS 5J TO -5 DIVERSION STRUCTURE - NATURAL GROUND PROPOSED GRADING r �1 PROPOSED MEDIAN \� O. / ^ 11'1- 5 \" (\ 1740 ---- \ \\ 7. ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD SHALL BE ACCOMMODATED ON THE FINAL DESIGN OR 760 720 680 oa oCe p PROPOSED P OPOSE E WALLA" 7.2213 FIRE AND PLANNING LP PROPOSED ST. BY > 0O XISTIN k=pl ml ,� lo°e \ -------------------------------- OPOSE " 8" ST. P !OPOSED -------------- 6.0' PRO SED ADE ---- Lots -' el PRIC Lot 10 BLVD. --- A" ST. Pad 7082' = EXI TING G DE ---- vmt m - LI 1 1 Lot 1 ENHANCED PAVEMENT NOTES 760\ / \�\ AREA TO BE DEDICATED TO 1. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 8714-002-900, 8714-002-901, 8714-002-902, /A �\ O EX R/w THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 8714-002-903 AND 8714-015-901. A EX. CURB � � g g, Aa V o1T0 o A \/ ,A PROPOSED CURB 720 \ \ / \ `\\ / o PROPOSED R/W r� �� ^� �zR/N' \ ^ i i \� Cut 2 EXISTING &PROPOSED ZONING: SITE D SPECIFIC PLAN \\�EXIS77NG 8" SEI}ER/ \ \ \\\ .�� / \ y/ $ - / l Fill C ILL LINE 3. EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT I / I UT F r \ / EX SIGNAGE 70 BE _ 41 \ /+Tvq / l \ \ \ \ �/ / TO BE RELOCiATE�D 13y p W6 \�\ ! l e I 4. PROPOSED LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL 680 \ �.i / e �t9 r yJ l �\... F. H. FIRE HYDRANT \ y g /^N Z \ 5. EXISTING & PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN: SPECIFIC PLAN, SITE D. 0 40 80 120 180 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680 720 760 800 840 880 920 960 1000 1040 1080 1120 CONNECT 70 r EX. 10" ACP WATER - j8 -j \'$ G, ' 13p 135 24 \\\ TFlrl rT /id ;�z�SEWER DRAIN LOW PLOW 7i 1 6. ALL STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND GRADING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE �, / VIEW PROFILE #3 \ / m \� EXIS NG $" -SEWER /`,BPR r ` psl \\ 1\\ x A s WITH DIAMOND BAR STANDARDS, ORDINANCES AND APPROVED MODIFICATIONS HERETO. / A w p 5 RT a \ d Iva, 87'3, PIGS 5J TO -5 DIVERSION STRUCTURE - NATURAL GROUND PROPOSED GRADING r �1 PROPOSED MEDIAN \� O. / ^ 11'1- 5 \" (\ 1740 ---- \ \\ 7. ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD SHALL BE ACCOMMODATED ON THE FINAL DESIGN OR 760 720 680 840 < / o / ^ --"""' 3 / Poli \\ ,139.5 \ \\ Nva MP -40 MEDIA FILTER THEY SHALL BE EITHER QUITCLAIMED, ABANDONED OR RELOCATED TO THE 1 n \\ vc\ p \ \ % SATISFACTION OF ALL INTERESTED PARTIES. DRAINAGE AND PUBLIC UTILITY EX SIGNAGE TO BE - /x'!= - 'd �.� \ \ �y r rm\ TO BE RELOCATED /p , _y 305 73 0 \�\ \u\\\ �� TREATMENT BMP EASEMENTS NECESSARY TO SERVE THIS PROJECT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE Boo 71RAL7 J'k I0t'JY� \ _ ^^ y -� - sl t m\ I CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AND WITH THE UTILITY PURVEYORS. EXISTING STORM DRAIN ` j \ o r --& Id PtiS -� p \N\\ ps1}99 i \S NATURAL AREA TO - (� EASEMENTS WILL BE ABANDONED DURING THE FINAL MAP PROCEDURES. BE PRESERVED PROPOSED SIGNAL / " /.91111 A 'o\ psl 1 �i o� �� o -_ / / I )�I S. MULTI FAMILY BUILDING TO MEET NFPA 13 STANDARDS. •' \ y }0� \ `nom �i I CONNECT TO EXISTING ••VA/ o \ _ zB0 \ t0" ACP WATER � v � _ I EX/ST/NG EASEMENTS 9. ESTIMATED EARTHWORK QUANTITIES: 415,500 LYS. CUT, 415,500 LYS. FILL. ps136 12 5 � 1 N 3,¢ pR 1NUFY 10. SEWER SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION \ M U R O2 EASEMENT 70 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES DISTRICT. 6 \5 p 871g. _ REC FEBRUARY 8, 1954 /N BOOK 43774, PAGE 241, UR 720 � - \ ' W - s \ r?2 " �f / / \ � , P' R` � � d� M � ;95 I \\ WPtV 11. PER LA COUNTY FIRM PANEL 1880 OF 2350. / 30' LANDS PES a 5Ir pslil5 -I 2 \ 1199 �fi>,r''j/ 2' pol \ m \o p5E ZER O3 EASEMENT TO GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, A CORPORATION ,9- \V ps13g5 \ -- '� FOR POLE LINES REC APRIL 28, 1954 /N BOOK 44446, PAGE 33 0R 12. PRIVATE WATER QUALITY BMP'S TO BE MAINTAINED BY H.O.A. / \2 a \ CV 6Bo � ,0•V1 � � C G � `vl I sltg9 2. "�. p a � app \\\\ \\... O6 EASEMENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR STORM GRAIN PURPOSES AS SHOWN ON TRACT No. 27577 REC IN 13. LOTS 62 & 63 ARE TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR &MAINTAINED 4 16 .0. " \ P s1'L1S9 // sl BY THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 A80 520 560 600 640 680 720 760 800 840 880 920 / - t 6 :�, \ \ p / E P \ \ \ BK 702, PGS. 22 70 25 INCLUSIVE OF MAPS RECORDS LOS ANGELES COUNTY. /To SIGNAGE TO BE 5 \ i t l TO BE RELOCATED �-I- � � % � 0 ®e S _� \ \ 0 6 MSE I \qea i \� �-1�' _ - - O EASEMENT 70 THE PUBLIC FOR WATER PIPELINES REC. AUGUST 31, 7960 AS INSL No. 3278, IN BK; 14. ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG DIAMOND BAR BLVD,. BREA CANYON RD AND -1 RIGHT-OF-WAY TO / o 0 0 _ o \� ^� ps11%' ps1 \ \ Ps -- _L _ _ _ _ PASADO DR. TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. / / I TR ICT 1117 _15DT.�l o'•� BE DEDICATED TO THE -F - � R°' " �'Psj1 \\\\ PsJA s1�5 \ \\ NO PAGE 305, OR. SURVEYORS N07E.' EASEMENT FOLLOWS THE CENTERLINE OF DIAMOND BAR BTW, / I CITY OF DIAMOND BAR a 2d \ 5c 1� l 6 0 - p l NO W/DTH IS GIVEN IN THE DOCUMENT 15. ALL TRASH 15 INDIVIDUAL PICK UP BY WASTE MANAGEMENT. TRASH PICK UP FOR i / $ / g -'� �5 �'a I sT6'\� g�+ .5 \ \ \ \ I, 17 EASEMENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR STREET PURPOSES AS SHOWN ON TRACT No. 25989 REC. IN BK 714, LOTS 2 THROUGH 5 NEEDS TO BE LOCATED ON "B'• STREET. TRASH PICK UP FOR EX.- 12' ACP WATER " 1`' -• P o, Q.' 10 \ s ?,i756.5 s13 \ ) 405 1 ro 1� gRUw P LOT 1 WILL BE ALONG THE LOOP ALLEY. m. ,p eb \ J 4a� . j ( P 2 • 01 p PGS 5 70 7 OF MAPS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY / /TO�BE RELOCATED _ EASEMENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR STORM DRAINS AND SANITARY SEWER AS SHOWN ON TRACT NO. 27577 16, LOTS 1-5 TO BE MAPPED FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES. r PROPOSED MEDIA m. / 'CUi Iyy. '� \ �.. ,-1gp \. o \� \ ps136 P' s \\\\ 111 .. \ \ BETPRESER ED URAL AREA TO EX POWER POLE/ oVfl / ps113 g -, P \ \ 2' ps1115 \ �, 7 ? WqD\ \ . ^ \\- V I I I REC IN BK 702, PGS 22 TO 25 INCLUSIVE OF MAPS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY. STORM DRAIN SYSTEM TO BE PRIVATE. 70 BE RELOCA� �'- -5 g0 n 141 V A Ps _V - ® EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN COUNT/ES GAS COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA FOR GAS PIPE LINES, LIGHT, POWER 6" 7.6" PROPOSED SIGNAL - a$ 1 ' ' Psl S / 186 V A A g0 _ ---- 18. EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED PER TREE SURVEY. C.F. PER PIAN 6" 12" 12" MODIFICATION CL - ,� FII( .1 - s1 \ 5 V l // A - PURPOSES REC FEBRUARY 17, 1964 REC AS INSL 3774, OR. W DIAMOND BAR BLVD 10" __ _ PROPOSED ft/Wi ,N --- � � � VA X1,3 � p A o � I p AVo A p�l� 1 & BREA CANYON RD. F o_- p 18 \ _ _ - �g 0 vv CUi a c ,2 AG V V v 5 x116 v i 61 V EASEMENT TO THE DIAMOND BAR WATER COMPANY FOR WATER PIPES REC AUGUST 31, 9960 REG. IN BK. 1-1/2 i,:, t PROPOSED EWA K i '' '� �' p i1 9` 185 V A 72 P I 3• A '� �' 168.5 s" V 0-962, PAGE 305, OR. AND REC. DATE: AUGUST 10, 1964 AS INST. No. 3417, OR R_ 1/2" R=3' .,,�; � � _ _ $ $ $ .. ` �� / i 0 AAVA 0� � ,1133 _ o !v Psl AV A � � 0 P ? SURVEYOR'S NOTE, EASEMENT FOLLOWS THECENTERLINE OF DIAMOND BAR BLVD., NO WIDTH IS GIVEN .. 12„W� 3 5 ti -_ _ EX R/W '- .. T ,1A�'. P hd� yF V . V A Ps 180 Ol 6 Pi188. 33 oa A IN THE DOCUMENT UTILITY 2 o c. s. TY AGENCIES .. � R=1/z• e :".,<;. FL R=1/2” - _ _ o _ -- 2,• -Ex cuee.�� ... ,..:':.: •t4 �111�1 2' vv ,� HIv ° v 5 v v v t.Z _ A W� TRASH: (SINGLE FAMILY HOMES) e v vv 1,1 1,8. vvl- - 8l? v ' • ' •->• _ EX. POKER POI - _ o� _ -- �- "r"' p s. 5 ` O 1 4' w Pz 9 \ aM . ' 6- . = 6a Pi1 NATURAL AREA 6 EASEMENT TO THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FOR SANITARY SEWER PURPOSES REC. NOVEMBER 11, 1971 WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WASTE MANAGEMENT INC. ' -• - - -.; ..: : ° iO BE RELOCATED 12 W-� tz W p_ _-- N _. /' v v , ? vy P ,s' �5! ov v��` 5 p=119 a- 35 6� U, ; BE PRESERVED 'i AS INST 3366, O.R. 271 S. BREA CANYON ROAD 13940 E. LIVE OAK AVE. A\ \ 1 q \ RE ps1 sp I V g' Y 1• l0 i '' - WALNUT, CA 91789 BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 •- . .:.:;:- .'.: / X23 - _- _ ___ j r ps. " 12 � ��-psl8 • - •- .. . - � � e- psl � � s8° S � 9 - V p �, � � / � 7 EASEMENT TO THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FOR STORM DRAIN, INGRESS AND EGRESS REC. DATE (909) 595-7554 (800) 266-7551 o \ ,9 .. , 36 MAY 982 AS INST. 82-508759, O.R. 5 _2 v v sL poP ' ,. v . v v �- p L, 2d' ,•• Z slp6' v v 11 32 " A A 6 TELEPHONE SERVICE: TRASH: FOR MULTI -FAMILY O RIGHT-OF-WAY TO ti 1 680 MP -40 �' TDRM IN P V 4'se \ l 1 4' R 9a i' 60 t,,p1 R3T H 18 1 BE DEDICATED TO THE EDTA FILTER 8 LOW FLOW X p� 6 6 s1 31 's V 1,51 , 1 A M V , v - 6 3 6 'o' �/ VERIZON VALLEY VISTA INC. ^ O Dll/ERSION 'o sl 1 - ,....r 6 b8 1a% •N 1 1 s" 1 5 8 P, 8 0 \ ` / / ✓{` 3' BROW�� /q G mrD 6, ry RB & GUM �ITY OF DI MOND BAR `a - EATMENT P To P p8 P - vv w P` 6 -1 �FII( CUi / UITCH, irP 1400 PHILLIPS RANCH RD. BALDW E. LIVE OAK AVE. 4 ROLLED CURB k GUTTER {.VI4U W� 4LI� d / - / � _ � -T G7uRE -' � � � <^ _ r \ � �q � � � 9 bd r i i � I �` POMONA, CA 91766 BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 7 / v -- _ a A p0.2 25 S ps1116 ��, vv ps1151 7 5 as4-y&r �� 1 : o �s� /c v sj855 �- 3 0 s /� / & _ ) ( (800) 483-5000 (800) 266-7551 NIS NTS `Fill / //' v v ° � P � /� z • _ >� 1 � " I (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) / '/ /Psl I/�s 1 �2 \ s1%61 3 r'/ r'3�., 0 o.uMp y \ \�� ps1134 v p j 60 r �5 r '`\ '( ELECTRIC SERVICE: CABLE N � T.1 I � ; I I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. TIME WARNER 013 51 �;,/ / P� ,1615 �.II _ 59 S�N DIMASG CA V91773 GLENDORA,OCAE96740 Ps114 \ s1 I e 1 N 1..i, NATURAL AREA To -.- �I (800) 655-4555 3' EX- US 9 e° / /// / \\ `'% o� �' 6�\ po71 69a i \ po1�'S i a s-�/ e2 P'1610 P'O I_ i o-7 BE PRESERVED l �I jT �1-+- �I POSTAL SERVICE: _ s, o \ r DI7C�E7YP - - _. 4 " „ \, 1'J �€ , .. ,r ! O GAS SERVICE: USPS GARAGE / /EX k/w 7i ��02/ / / A' o s" p ` 7 s1 ,' ps11 1 _ - 1 ,r / '> N1 0 A,5 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. DIAMOND SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BLVD. / 0 � o: DOOR EX POWER POLE r CU ym�•� 0`u s- / / a r. p ) o/ 5 t -'� ` �1 1919 S, STATE COLLEGE BLVD. DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 T AND U 6•• ANAHEIM, CA 92806 (800) 27 TILITIES PR POSED RB RF ^� / 4 a - l l ^/ �� . m r 3 5-8777 CUN /W ^o �_ /� 2i 2� %MM 70 BE RELOCATED PROPOSED R ps1111 q 3 PEDESTRIAN / p 'r9� �i� ps185•rJ Bo �I \v �Dl'r > �, w- 1,2A 27-2200 SEWER SERVICE: (TR UNK LINES( (800) 4 ,i,• / T� / Opp // / 0f A / o 'z '•'. ps > /8 b�� / �' / o �s `< v s� ss: G `L^ .r -- SCHOOL DISTRICT: LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT WALNUT VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT 1955 WORKMAN MILL ROAD W4i a § / / / ! /•�o^ ,'17 880 SOUTH LEMON AVE. WHITTI(562)E6 CA 90607 06 SR\� P 1 i/ > / `. ,l 90 / �. 61 A \: �.. pot CI r i> _ \/ WALNUT. CA 91789 (562) 699-7411 / /o / h //��° 6/ / I // / /y. l / `> - 0 m. 16 / / Ams // > P, h3 ^ 6 a la polo- , \� 16o HE 93 _ /' SEWER SERVICE. (MAIN LINES) 0 3 I lob U CURB DETAIL / " / �`O�� h / // - 'r / / / 1` r ,153 , , r >. / a^ A'C r I LOS ANGELES COUNTY OF PUBLIC WORKS e / m. p' 2 �4 0 v r ri ) SEWER MAINTENANCE DISTRICT r Y r r 9� . s GUi NTS � < / / h O / � / Ic Zt / / / 'L 6 . \ � , r I (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) / / p 675 / O / / - "a / / >O LOT a' � `' \ O ^ - tS `P ' ° sz & 181 5 r r / 900 LHAM BR , NTCA g L0V 6.3 / 0 00 / / ��A. , r a �..., > P> \o r >' r .Q o , / -<<°. r .y _.. p r , ALHAMBRA. CA a �9 IPA / `O� o / 1 v r� / /y. $ r' ��C �/5� 6t �'Py' r 4. r / s>, q �� r L Jr'i sT 3' BROW / / J \ 4, / h / / 90i' 3K'- r r r s1� 2 I, r .\o Q J• y r er DITCH, TYP C / cslrII�.P�� a s> RTft ,o A o BENCH MARK s rlc� r 76 ' tia / q0 s 4 . FI 1 /._ // _ \ / / / �" '\� >> , r , Q NATURAL AREA TOi p XISTING / e� / e s> r 0- - 40 ('` - S h\ v , BE PRESERVED' LOS ANGELES COUNTY BENCHMARK NO. G 5073 ELEVATION: 726.809 DATUM: NAVD 88, B / U ERGROUNO / °' / / /'by ^° h 3 1• r/ Po 5 r 111.5 / ,ri 0� \ I \ 2005 ADJUSTMENT ti Fill @ e, b 26' r' / 0 / Pr. / R CE FLOWS �ry� 7a / ooP 61 I I/ M• / / / �0 r /b . BUY ^3P o _ mom, / "` RS f '\° i x18,.5 - -1 9 / i/ /_ 7 R r> Q o°j h n ,� h o / / �ti a>, r< P/ y DESCRIPTION: LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TAG IN EAST CURB OF DIAMOND BAR BLVD. 42.7 .FEET EAST OF CENTERLINE AND 95 FEET NORTH OF CENTERLINE OF �p�k4� /�' / �Q�OPGT CROOKED CREEK DRIVE. " �Q• I �- -- / / l>o C 1 r.. r 6 moo\ pot sP �b / /Y \� mss• - \ 11,2 'r PSI _ LEGAL DESCRIPTION I F / ^e As'x> 0�5 .a� 9j/g \✓ s>'r7 �, / po11 L \ �P c /� FlRE TRUCK �� \ 6 — 5.oR = 1 :: N a 61 �.a 11 P/1 15 s e5 o106.Oss" J, s , s \ �. ' S� 0/ / e/ � BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 9 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO TURNING RADIUS DETAIL �� ^ — i a ' �5 s P A� 0 6 • ti / MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, GOUTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. J. 9, m �O � / ° EC /, c rr h .\9 ij 3' TOE .._ v - �✓�� a1 � / �. V 690 7! OS ' � r' � '��+ '.a 0 60 0. 69 b.. � IB' r y0• �rii DITCFY TYP / 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK (/ 1 / / ,/ ry9 v 6, ?,1-- 16 v "rz^y - 9 r' / _ _ u 5o r STA TEMENT OF OWNERSHIP Tr�rIC7_ l�)Cl _,271v-77� o/ i ?7s s _I - 905 P'�O90 7 po1565 y N 5� w 9Y A - i �r / Ty rC I T IIID. <?11-19r) 1 HEREBY STATE THAT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED UNDER MY EpSNC .0 \/ SUPERVISION AND THAT THE OWNER OF RECORD HAS KNOWLEDGE h 68. /LP / �0 4 X160' Pot j NATURAL AREA TO OF AND CONSENTS TO THE FILING OF THIS MAP. 44 , 55 ESMT � RZ i BE PRESERVED 1l} 1 l r r \ p T��r , r I � P 0� 1 \ v mi.\ > � TYP/CAL STREET SECT/ONS / I NATURAL AREA TO \\ \ \^ \ oY \\\c \ ss' pol�so TeE FA IF 11 BE PRESERVED \ mop ` 25• 1S r`,�„ DITCH, TYP - 1 �� SERVICE ROAD ANo MO p,1 C _.. r / - / TRAC-r J` D, �JeJBr� PEDEsrRIAN AccrsS ONLY -_� ^ -&o 2.; . po1560 .s 'y0 / ' EMERGENCY -�j� /, s, 16 rn d ,0 3'B , i '`V• INGRLSS EGRESS > _ IT gg / _ � �r ITCH, TIC ^ b � 6//' �/ { ` _ 3' TOE DITCH, TYP _ 1 - 6 a NATUIRAL AREA TO BE PRESERVED 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK f � EMERGENCY 'INGREss/EGRESS 7•p �SSEC7T�ION A—A •%p NORTHERLY CL SOUTHERLY ENTRY ' PORTION OF "As STREET R/W R/W R/W R/W R/N' 46' R R/W \. RIGHT-OF-WAY TO 54' R/W 54' R/W 1W BE DEDICATED TO THE (PRIVATE)aTY� 61AMOND BAR 27.0' 27.0' 27.0' 27.0• 23.0' 23.0' r 1 9.0' 36' 9.0'1 I 14.0' 26' 14.0' I 36 5' 78' 18' S' 1V� 14' S' 18' 78' 5' 4'1 14, 10' 13' 13' f0' 411 p• g• g• p• 2' 2�R WY PKW 2WYI� ,,��PKW 2 2' PKWY PKWY 2, 0,�RKING P/IRKING / 81 RKIJc� RKInc�2^ V' 2v W 2� OOH• 2 D, 11 L �P SIDEWALK SIDEWALK SIDEWALK SIDEWALK SIDEWALK SIDEWALK Q rvmo i ruoo x SECTION B—B ENTRY • PORTION OF "A" STREET (PRIVATE) 1 50 50 I 8' 42' 4 35' 8' MDI N 3• I 2.0% - 2.09 Tim T IUr J9"� URB 6" CURB &GUTTER 6" CURB &GUTTER ' SIDEWALK SECTION L—L EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) WALL CURB & CURB & GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER SECTION E—E SECTION C—C SECTION D—D 'B' STREET - LOCAL STREET 'A' STREET - LOCAL STREET 'A' STREET IF LOCAL STREET (TAPER) PARKING BOTH SIDES PARKING BOTH SIDES NO PARKING (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) r PROPOSED NIEROWNENTS R/W 112' 1 50' I 54' I� 42' 8' 4' 42' 8'1 M DIiN I I I 1 _ I 2.0% ® CURR 6" CURB & GUTTER 8' SIL \-6" CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK -8' SIDEWALK SECTION L—L PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) 50' 50' 35' 4' 45' -6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER - SECTION M—M EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) r PROPOSED W R/W i NTPROVQIIN/S R/W 718' I 50' 60' I 8' 8' 35' 4' 63' I I 3• I M DIAN I -� 3' 207 I SOX s CURB L PROPOSED 8" CURB & GUTTERfi" CURB &GURETAINING WALL TTER 8' SIDEWALK PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK SECTION M—M PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) ' ?IF- `_ F. (-7-/ // i rL �• \\ a' ^O� 9-j515 N Ol' ti / - 8' EASEMENT 12' EASEM NT 2' 15.0' 2' \ \ i ' 2' 0.5• EASEMENT 0.5• ' 12.0' 2' 1$%'NATURAL A A `\05' 05' j62 0.5' BE- ESE ED0-tow \ \ \ 1:1 2''4 �2q1 11 ,T.,1 414-0 SWALE SWALE1 '✓"Y T, 8 / / / �\ AC BERM J AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM NATURAL AREA \ SECTION 1-1 SECTION J—J SECTION K—K / BEPRESERVED EMERGENCY ACCESS ROAD SERVICE ACCESS ROAD PEDESTRIAWSERVICE ACCESS ROAD 7 /v \ I (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) n / \ \)NATURAL AREA �/ ��55 0 0 o g E PRESERVED f0 ❑ 0 0 J 35' 32' 326' m 4• � FL Y8• y• 3• v FL pg• FL 19• 2.875' v FL 26' 2.875' MIN. TRAVEL MIN. MIN. TRAVEL PARKING MIN. TRAVEL MIN. 1 .ZQx Asx _.oz 4" ROLLED O" CURB d" ROLLED 6°CURB 4" ROLLED 0' CURB \\ GDR CURB DR SECTION F—F SECTION G—G SECTION H—H PRIVATE STREET PRIVATE STREET TYPICAL PRIVATE DRIVE (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) AND FlRE LANE (PRIVATE) PROPOSm IMPROVOORS DE rF►1 r PROPOSED r PROPOSED I I NMRO"ODS CE I NIPROWEMENTS 100' R/W RAV I 1 6' I R/IY R/W 80 REW R/W 92' I R/W 50' 50' 50' I 1 56' 1 40' 40' 40, 52' 35' 14' 35' 8' 8' 42' I 4' I 4/' 1 8' 3- 8' 32' 32' 8' II MEQ IAN I I M DI N I 8' 32' 44' 8'I Ttt2.0% 2.OS I 2.09 2L I 2DR ,� s PROPOSED 6" CURE" CURB. & GUTTER CURB L RETAINING WALL 6" CURB &GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER L i 6" CURB' & GUTTER B" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK — EXISTING 8' SIDEWALK 6" CURB & GUTTER 9' SIDEWALK 8' SIDEWALK PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK SECTION N—N SECTION N—N SECTION 0-0 SECTION 0-0 EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. EXISTING BREA CANYON ROAD PROPOSED BREA CANYON ROAD (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) TOTAL AREA OF GRADING =18.62 AC AREA OF CUT = 5739 AREA OF FULL = 4271 EDWARD A. MANDICH 7.2213 FIRE AND PLANNING LP DATE REVISION BY > 0O P !OPOSED Pad=7 6.0' -' rn PRIC POSED A" ST. Lot 29 & 30ms �OI --\a vmt - EXIS ING GRADE Lot 39 - - ISTING 'P ----------- ------- -_- S. DIAMOND BAR -'- OPOSE Pa =727"5 BLVD. j PacII25' Pa =7220' "B"ST. pi Lot PROP SED R AINING WALL ��\-p OPOSE RETAIN NG W PR L POSED GRADE m 840 < / o / ^ --"""' 3 / Poli \\ ,139.5 \ \\ Nva MP -40 MEDIA FILTER THEY SHALL BE EITHER QUITCLAIMED, ABANDONED OR RELOCATED TO THE 1 n \\ vc\ p \ \ % SATISFACTION OF ALL INTERESTED PARTIES. DRAINAGE AND PUBLIC UTILITY EX SIGNAGE TO BE - /x'!= - 'd �.� \ \ �y r rm\ TO BE RELOCATED /p , _y 305 73 0 \�\ \u\\\ �� TREATMENT BMP EASEMENTS NECESSARY TO SERVE THIS PROJECT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE Boo 71RAL7 J'k I0t'JY� \ _ ^^ y -� - sl t m\ I CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AND WITH THE UTILITY PURVEYORS. EXISTING STORM DRAIN ` j \ o r --& Id PtiS -� p \N\\ ps1}99 i \S NATURAL AREA TO - (� EASEMENTS WILL BE ABANDONED DURING THE FINAL MAP PROCEDURES. BE PRESERVED PROPOSED SIGNAL / " /.91111 A 'o\ psl 1 �i o� �� o -_ / / I )�I S. MULTI FAMILY BUILDING TO MEET NFPA 13 STANDARDS. •' \ y }0� \ `nom �i I CONNECT TO EXISTING ••VA/ o \ _ zB0 \ t0" ACP WATER � v � _ I EX/ST/NG EASEMENTS 9. ESTIMATED EARTHWORK QUANTITIES: 415,500 LYS. CUT, 415,500 LYS. FILL. ps136 12 5 � 1 N 3,¢ pR 1NUFY 10. SEWER SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION \ M U R O2 EASEMENT 70 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES DISTRICT. 6 \5 p 871g. _ REC FEBRUARY 8, 1954 /N BOOK 43774, PAGE 241, UR 720 � - \ ' W - s \ r?2 " �f / / \ � , P' R` � � d� M � ;95 I \\ WPtV 11. PER LA COUNTY FIRM PANEL 1880 OF 2350. / 30' LANDS PES a 5Ir pslil5 -I 2 \ 1199 �fi>,r''j/ 2' pol \ m \o p5E ZER O3 EASEMENT TO GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, A CORPORATION ,9- \V ps13g5 \ -- '� FOR POLE LINES REC APRIL 28, 1954 /N BOOK 44446, PAGE 33 0R 12. PRIVATE WATER QUALITY BMP'S TO BE MAINTAINED BY H.O.A. / \2 a \ CV 6Bo � ,0•V1 � � C G � `vl I sltg9 2. "�. p a � app \\\\ \\... O6 EASEMENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR STORM GRAIN PURPOSES AS SHOWN ON TRACT No. 27577 REC IN 13. LOTS 62 & 63 ARE TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR &MAINTAINED 4 16 .0. " \ P s1'L1S9 // sl BY THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 A80 520 560 600 640 680 720 760 800 840 880 920 / - t 6 :�, \ \ p / E P \ \ \ BK 702, PGS. 22 70 25 INCLUSIVE OF MAPS RECORDS LOS ANGELES COUNTY. /To SIGNAGE TO BE 5 \ i t l TO BE RELOCATED �-I- � � % � 0 ®e S _� \ \ 0 6 MSE I \qea i \� �-1�' _ - - O EASEMENT 70 THE PUBLIC FOR WATER PIPELINES REC. AUGUST 31, 7960 AS INSL No. 3278, IN BK; 14. ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG DIAMOND BAR BLVD,. BREA CANYON RD AND -1 RIGHT-OF-WAY TO / o 0 0 _ o \� ^� ps11%' ps1 \ \ Ps -- _L _ _ _ _ PASADO DR. TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. / / I TR ICT 1117 _15DT.�l o'•� BE DEDICATED TO THE -F - � R°' " �'Psj1 \\\\ PsJA s1�5 \ \\ NO PAGE 305, OR. SURVEYORS N07E.' EASEMENT FOLLOWS THE CENTERLINE OF DIAMOND BAR BTW, / I CITY OF DIAMOND BAR a 2d \ 5c 1� l 6 0 - p l NO W/DTH IS GIVEN IN THE DOCUMENT 15. ALL TRASH 15 INDIVIDUAL PICK UP BY WASTE MANAGEMENT. TRASH PICK UP FOR i / $ / g -'� �5 �'a I sT6'\� g�+ .5 \ \ \ \ I, 17 EASEMENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR STREET PURPOSES AS SHOWN ON TRACT No. 25989 REC. IN BK 714, LOTS 2 THROUGH 5 NEEDS TO BE LOCATED ON "B'• STREET. TRASH PICK UP FOR EX.- 12' ACP WATER " 1`' -• P o, Q.' 10 \ s ?,i756.5 s13 \ ) 405 1 ro 1� gRUw P LOT 1 WILL BE ALONG THE LOOP ALLEY. m. ,p eb \ J 4a� . j ( P 2 • 01 p PGS 5 70 7 OF MAPS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY / /TO�BE RELOCATED _ EASEMENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR STORM DRAINS AND SANITARY SEWER AS SHOWN ON TRACT NO. 27577 16, LOTS 1-5 TO BE MAPPED FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES. r PROPOSED MEDIA m. / 'CUi Iyy. '� \ �.. ,-1gp \. o \� \ ps136 P' s \\\\ 111 .. \ \ BETPRESER ED URAL AREA TO EX POWER POLE/ oVfl / ps113 g -, P \ \ 2' ps1115 \ �, 7 ? WqD\ \ . ^ \\- V I I I REC IN BK 702, PGS 22 TO 25 INCLUSIVE OF MAPS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY. STORM DRAIN SYSTEM TO BE PRIVATE. 70 BE RELOCA� �'- -5 g0 n 141 V A Ps _V - ® EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN COUNT/ES GAS COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA FOR GAS PIPE LINES, LIGHT, POWER 6" 7.6" PROPOSED SIGNAL - a$ 1 ' ' Psl S / 186 V A A g0 _ ---- 18. EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED PER TREE SURVEY. C.F. PER PIAN 6" 12" 12" MODIFICATION CL - ,� FII( .1 - s1 \ 5 V l // A - PURPOSES REC FEBRUARY 17, 1964 REC AS INSL 3774, OR. W DIAMOND BAR BLVD 10" __ _ PROPOSED ft/Wi ,N --- � � � VA X1,3 � p A o � I p AVo A p�l� 1 & BREA CANYON RD. F o_- p 18 \ _ _ - �g 0 vv CUi a c ,2 AG V V v 5 x116 v i 61 V EASEMENT TO THE DIAMOND BAR WATER COMPANY FOR WATER PIPES REC AUGUST 31, 9960 REG. IN BK. 1-1/2 i,:, t PROPOSED EWA K i '' '� �' p i1 9` 185 V A 72 P I 3• A '� �' 168.5 s" V 0-962, PAGE 305, OR. AND REC. DATE: AUGUST 10, 1964 AS INST. No. 3417, OR R_ 1/2" R=3' .,,�; � � _ _ $ $ $ .. ` �� / i 0 AAVA 0� � ,1133 _ o !v Psl AV A � � 0 P ? SURVEYOR'S NOTE, EASEMENT FOLLOWS THECENTERLINE OF DIAMOND BAR BLVD., NO WIDTH IS GIVEN .. 12„W� 3 5 ti -_ _ EX R/W '- .. T ,1A�'. P hd� yF V . V A Ps 180 Ol 6 Pi188. 33 oa A IN THE DOCUMENT UTILITY 2 o c. s. TY AGENCIES .. � R=1/z• e :".,<;. FL R=1/2” - _ _ o _ -- 2,• -Ex cuee.�� ... ,..:':.: •t4 �111�1 2' vv ,� HIv ° v 5 v v v t.Z _ A W� TRASH: (SINGLE FAMILY HOMES) e v vv 1,1 1,8. vvl- - 8l? v ' • ' •->• _ EX. POKER POI - _ o� _ -- �- "r"' p s. 5 ` O 1 4' w Pz 9 \ aM . ' 6- . = 6a Pi1 NATURAL AREA 6 EASEMENT TO THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FOR SANITARY SEWER PURPOSES REC. NOVEMBER 11, 1971 WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WASTE MANAGEMENT INC. ' -• - - -.; ..: : ° iO BE RELOCATED 12 W-� tz W p_ _-- N _. /' v v , ? vy P ,s' �5! ov v��` 5 p=119 a- 35 6� U, ; BE PRESERVED 'i AS INST 3366, O.R. 271 S. BREA CANYON ROAD 13940 E. LIVE OAK AVE. A\ \ 1 q \ RE ps1 sp I V g' Y 1• l0 i '' - WALNUT, CA 91789 BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 •- . .:.:;:- .'.: / X23 - _- _ ___ j r ps. " 12 � ��-psl8 • - •- .. . - � � e- psl � � s8° S � 9 - V p �, � � / � 7 EASEMENT TO THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FOR STORM DRAIN, INGRESS AND EGRESS REC. DATE (909) 595-7554 (800) 266-7551 o \ ,9 .. , 36 MAY 982 AS INST. 82-508759, O.R. 5 _2 v v sL poP ' ,. v . v v �- p L, 2d' ,•• Z slp6' v v 11 32 " A A 6 TELEPHONE SERVICE: TRASH: FOR MULTI -FAMILY O RIGHT-OF-WAY TO ti 1 680 MP -40 �' TDRM IN P V 4'se \ l 1 4' R 9a i' 60 t,,p1 R3T H 18 1 BE DEDICATED TO THE EDTA FILTER 8 LOW FLOW X p� 6 6 s1 31 's V 1,51 , 1 A M V , v - 6 3 6 'o' �/ VERIZON VALLEY VISTA INC. ^ O Dll/ERSION 'o sl 1 - ,....r 6 b8 1a% •N 1 1 s" 1 5 8 P, 8 0 \ ` / / ✓{` 3' BROW�� /q G mrD 6, ry RB & GUM �ITY OF DI MOND BAR `a - EATMENT P To P p8 P - vv w P` 6 -1 �FII( CUi / UITCH, irP 1400 PHILLIPS RANCH RD. BALDW E. LIVE OAK AVE. 4 ROLLED CURB k GUTTER {.VI4U W� 4LI� d / - / � _ � -T G7uRE -' � � � <^ _ r \ � �q � � � 9 bd r i i � I �` POMONA, CA 91766 BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 7 / v -- _ a A p0.2 25 S ps1116 ��, vv ps1151 7 5 as4-y&r �� 1 : o �s� /c v sj855 �- 3 0 s /� / & _ ) ( (800) 483-5000 (800) 266-7551 NIS NTS `Fill / //' v v ° � P � /� z • _ >� 1 � " I (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) / '/ /Psl I/�s 1 �2 \ s1%61 3 r'/ r'3�., 0 o.uMp y \ \�� ps1134 v p j 60 r �5 r '`\ '( ELECTRIC SERVICE: CABLE N � T.1 I � ; I I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. TIME WARNER 013 51 �;,/ / P� ,1615 �.II _ 59 S�N DIMASG CA V91773 GLENDORA,OCAE96740 Ps114 \ s1 I e 1 N 1..i, NATURAL AREA To -.- �I (800) 655-4555 3' EX- US 9 e° / /// / \\ `'% o� �' 6�\ po71 69a i \ po1�'S i a s-�/ e2 P'1610 P'O I_ i o-7 BE PRESERVED l �I jT �1-+- �I POSTAL SERVICE: _ s, o \ r DI7C�E7YP - - _. 4 " „ \, 1'J �€ , .. ,r ! O GAS SERVICE: USPS GARAGE / /EX k/w 7i ��02/ / / A' o s" p ` 7 s1 ,' ps11 1 _ - 1 ,r / '> N1 0 A,5 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. DIAMOND SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BLVD. / 0 � o: DOOR EX POWER POLE r CU ym�•� 0`u s- / / a r. p ) o/ 5 t -'� ` �1 1919 S, STATE COLLEGE BLVD. DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 T AND U 6•• ANAHEIM, CA 92806 (800) 27 TILITIES PR POSED RB RF ^� / 4 a - l l ^/ �� . m r 3 5-8777 CUN /W ^o �_ /� 2i 2� %MM 70 BE RELOCATED PROPOSED R ps1111 q 3 PEDESTRIAN / p 'r9� �i� ps185•rJ Bo �I \v �Dl'r > �, w- 1,2A 27-2200 SEWER SERVICE: (TR UNK LINES( (800) 4 ,i,• / T� / Opp // / 0f A / o 'z '•'. ps > /8 b�� / �' / o �s `< v s� ss: G `L^ .r -- SCHOOL DISTRICT: LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT WALNUT VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT 1955 WORKMAN MILL ROAD W4i a § / / / ! /•�o^ ,'17 880 SOUTH LEMON AVE. WHITTI(562)E6 CA 90607 06 SR\� P 1 i/ > / `. ,l 90 / �. 61 A \: �.. pot CI r i> _ \/ WALNUT. CA 91789 (562) 699-7411 / /o / h //��° 6/ / I // / /y. l / `> - 0 m. 16 / / Ams // > P, h3 ^ 6 a la polo- , \� 16o HE 93 _ /' SEWER SERVICE. (MAIN LINES) 0 3 I lob U CURB DETAIL / " / �`O�� h / // - 'r / / / 1` r ,153 , , r >. / a^ A'C r I LOS ANGELES COUNTY OF PUBLIC WORKS e / m. p' 2 �4 0 v r ri ) SEWER MAINTENANCE DISTRICT r Y r r 9� . s GUi NTS � < / / h O / � / Ic Zt / / / 'L 6 . \ � , r I (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) / / p 675 / O / / - "a / / >O LOT a' � `' \ O ^ - tS `P ' ° sz & 181 5 r r / 900 LHAM BR , NTCA g L0V 6.3 / 0 00 / / ��A. , r a �..., > P> \o r >' r .Q o , / -<<°. r .y _.. p r , ALHAMBRA. CA a �9 IPA / `O� o / 1 v r� / /y. $ r' ��C �/5� 6t �'Py' r 4. r / s>, q �� r L Jr'i sT 3' BROW / / J \ 4, / h / / 90i' 3K'- r r r s1� 2 I, r .\o Q J• y r er DITCH, TYP C / cslrII�.P�� a s> RTft ,o A o BENCH MARK s rlc� r 76 ' tia / q0 s 4 . FI 1 /._ // _ \ / / / �" '\� >> , r , Q NATURAL AREA TOi p XISTING / e� / e s> r 0- - 40 ('` - S h\ v , BE PRESERVED' LOS ANGELES COUNTY BENCHMARK NO. G 5073 ELEVATION: 726.809 DATUM: NAVD 88, B / U ERGROUNO / °' / / /'by ^° h 3 1• r/ Po 5 r 111.5 / ,ri 0� \ I \ 2005 ADJUSTMENT ti Fill @ e, b 26' r' / 0 / Pr. / R CE FLOWS �ry� 7a / ooP 61 I I/ M• / / / �0 r /b . BUY ^3P o _ mom, / "` RS f '\° i x18,.5 - -1 9 / i/ /_ 7 R r> Q o°j h n ,� h o / / �ti a>, r< P/ y DESCRIPTION: LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TAG IN EAST CURB OF DIAMOND BAR BLVD. 42.7 .FEET EAST OF CENTERLINE AND 95 FEET NORTH OF CENTERLINE OF �p�k4� /�' / �Q�OPGT CROOKED CREEK DRIVE. " �Q• I �- -- / / l>o C 1 r.. r 6 moo\ pot sP �b / /Y \� mss• - \ 11,2 'r PSI _ LEGAL DESCRIPTION I F / ^e As'x> 0�5 .a� 9j/g \✓ s>'r7 �, / po11 L \ �P c /� FlRE TRUCK �� \ 6 — 5.oR = 1 :: N a 61 �.a 11 P/1 15 s e5 o106.Oss" J, s , s \ �. ' S� 0/ / e/ � BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 9 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO TURNING RADIUS DETAIL �� ^ — i a ' �5 s P A� 0 6 • ti / MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, GOUTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. J. 9, m �O � / ° EC /, c rr h .\9 ij 3' TOE .._ v - �✓�� a1 � / �. V 690 7! OS ' � r' � '��+ '.a 0 60 0. 69 b.. � IB' r y0• �rii DITCFY TYP / 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK (/ 1 / / ,/ ry9 v 6, ?,1-- 16 v "rz^y - 9 r' / _ _ u 5o r STA TEMENT OF OWNERSHIP Tr�rIC7_ l�)Cl _,271v-77� o/ i ?7s s _I - 905 P'�O90 7 po1565 y N 5� w 9Y A - i �r / Ty rC I T IIID. <?11-19r) 1 HEREBY STATE THAT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED UNDER MY EpSNC .0 \/ SUPERVISION AND THAT THE OWNER OF RECORD HAS KNOWLEDGE h 68. /LP / �0 4 X160' Pot j NATURAL AREA TO OF AND CONSENTS TO THE FILING OF THIS MAP. 44 , 55 ESMT � RZ i BE PRESERVED 1l} 1 l r r \ p T��r , r I � P 0� 1 \ v mi.\ > � TYP/CAL STREET SECT/ONS / I NATURAL AREA TO \\ \ \^ \ oY \\\c \ ss' pol�so TeE FA IF 11 BE PRESERVED \ mop ` 25• 1S r`,�„ DITCH, TYP - 1 �� SERVICE ROAD ANo MO p,1 C _.. r / - / TRAC-r J` D, �JeJBr� PEDEsrRIAN AccrsS ONLY -_� ^ -&o 2.; . po1560 .s 'y0 / ' EMERGENCY -�j� /, s, 16 rn d ,0 3'B , i '`V• INGRLSS EGRESS > _ IT gg / _ � �r ITCH, TIC ^ b � 6//' �/ { ` _ 3' TOE DITCH, TYP _ 1 - 6 a NATUIRAL AREA TO BE PRESERVED 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK f � EMERGENCY 'INGREss/EGRESS 7•p �SSEC7T�ION A—A •%p NORTHERLY CL SOUTHERLY ENTRY ' PORTION OF "As STREET R/W R/W R/W R/W R/N' 46' R R/W \. RIGHT-OF-WAY TO 54' R/W 54' R/W 1W BE DEDICATED TO THE (PRIVATE)aTY� 61AMOND BAR 27.0' 27.0' 27.0' 27.0• 23.0' 23.0' r 1 9.0' 36' 9.0'1 I 14.0' 26' 14.0' I 36 5' 78' 18' S' 1V� 14' S' 18' 78' 5' 4'1 14, 10' 13' 13' f0' 411 p• g• g• p• 2' 2�R WY PKW 2WYI� ,,��PKW 2 2' PKWY PKWY 2, 0,�RKING P/IRKING / 81 RKIJc� RKInc�2^ V' 2v W 2� OOH• 2 D, 11 L �P SIDEWALK SIDEWALK SIDEWALK SIDEWALK SIDEWALK SIDEWALK Q rvmo i ruoo x SECTION B—B ENTRY • PORTION OF "A" STREET (PRIVATE) 1 50 50 I 8' 42' 4 35' 8' MDI N 3• I 2.0% - 2.09 Tim T IUr J9"� URB 6" CURB &GUTTER 6" CURB &GUTTER ' SIDEWALK SECTION L—L EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) WALL CURB & CURB & GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER SECTION E—E SECTION C—C SECTION D—D 'B' STREET - LOCAL STREET 'A' STREET - LOCAL STREET 'A' STREET IF LOCAL STREET (TAPER) PARKING BOTH SIDES PARKING BOTH SIDES NO PARKING (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) r PROPOSED NIEROWNENTS R/W 112' 1 50' I 54' I� 42' 8' 4' 42' 8'1 M DIiN I I I 1 _ I 2.0% ® CURR 6" CURB & GUTTER 8' SIL \-6" CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK -8' SIDEWALK SECTION L—L PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) 50' 50' 35' 4' 45' -6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER - SECTION M—M EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) r PROPOSED W R/W i NTPROVQIIN/S R/W 718' I 50' 60' I 8' 8' 35' 4' 63' I I 3• I M DIAN I -� 3' 207 I SOX s CURB L PROPOSED 8" CURB & GUTTERfi" CURB &GURETAINING WALL TTER 8' SIDEWALK PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK SECTION M—M PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) ' ?IF- `_ F. (-7-/ // i rL �• \\ a' ^O� 9-j515 N Ol' ti / - 8' EASEMENT 12' EASEM NT 2' 15.0' 2' \ \ i ' 2' 0.5• EASEMENT 0.5• ' 12.0' 2' 1$%'NATURAL A A `\05' 05' j62 0.5' BE- ESE ED0-tow \ \ \ 1:1 2''4 �2q1 11 ,T.,1 414-0 SWALE SWALE1 '✓"Y T, 8 / / / �\ AC BERM J AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM NATURAL AREA \ SECTION 1-1 SECTION J—J SECTION K—K / BEPRESERVED EMERGENCY ACCESS ROAD SERVICE ACCESS ROAD PEDESTRIAWSERVICE ACCESS ROAD 7 /v \ I (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) n / \ \)NATURAL AREA �/ ��55 0 0 o g E PRESERVED f0 ❑ 0 0 J 35' 32' 326' m 4• � FL Y8• y• 3• v FL pg• FL 19• 2.875' v FL 26' 2.875' MIN. TRAVEL MIN. MIN. TRAVEL PARKING MIN. TRAVEL MIN. 1 .ZQx Asx _.oz 4" ROLLED O" CURB d" ROLLED 6°CURB 4" ROLLED 0' CURB \\ GDR CURB DR SECTION F—F SECTION G—G SECTION H—H PRIVATE STREET PRIVATE STREET TYPICAL PRIVATE DRIVE (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) AND FlRE LANE (PRIVATE) PROPOSm IMPROVOORS DE rF►1 r PROPOSED r PROPOSED I I NMRO"ODS CE I NIPROWEMENTS 100' R/W RAV I 1 6' I R/IY R/W 80 REW R/W 92' I R/W 50' 50' 50' I 1 56' 1 40' 40' 40, 52' 35' 14' 35' 8' 8' 42' I 4' I 4/' 1 8' 3- 8' 32' 32' 8' II MEQ IAN I I M DI N I 8' 32' 44' 8'I Ttt2.0% 2.OS I 2.09 2L I 2DR ,� s PROPOSED 6" CURE" CURB. & GUTTER CURB L RETAINING WALL 6" CURB &GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER L i 6" CURB' & GUTTER B" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK — EXISTING 8' SIDEWALK 6" CURB & GUTTER 9' SIDEWALK 8' SIDEWALK PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK SECTION N—N SECTION N—N SECTION 0-0 SECTION 0-0 EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. EXISTING BREA CANYON ROAD PROPOSED BREA CANYON ROAD (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) TOTAL AREA OF GRADING =18.62 AC AREA OF CUT = 5739 AREA OF FULL = 4271 EDWARD A. MANDICH DATE W.O. FEET 50 120 GROSS AREA 0 30 D h CONTOUR INTERVAL INCHES TOTAL LOTS MAP DATE IDENTIFIER WE Of IAIECT CHANGE TO THIS MFH 7/30/13 BY: LP WTE OF TPIS PLOT 09/19 13 ly 30, 2013 1855-162AX 29.7 AC.± 5' PREPARED FOR. PREPARED BY.• OWNER.• t t LENNAR® Z ai 25 ENTERPRISE ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656 (949) 349-8100 HUNSAKER 6c ASSOCIATES Z I R V I N E I N C %ANNING ENLINEEBINC 9l1RVEYINL Three Hughes lrol , CA WI Hf: (949) 5830]59 PIk (949) Sg3t01g � GRAD/NG PLAN I VEST/NG TENTATIVE TRACT 72295 F:\0718\Planning\OA_Project\GRADING PLAN\0718P_GRADING PLAN. dwg 7.2213 FIRE AND PLANNING LP DATE REVISION BY DATE W.O. FEET 50 120 GROSS AREA 0 30 D h CONTOUR INTERVAL INCHES TOTAL LOTS MAP DATE IDENTIFIER WE Of IAIECT CHANGE TO THIS MFH 7/30/13 BY: LP WTE OF TPIS PLOT 09/19 13 ly 30, 2013 1855-162AX 29.7 AC.± 5' PREPARED FOR. PREPARED BY.• OWNER.• t t LENNAR® Z ai 25 ENTERPRISE ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656 (949) 349-8100 HUNSAKER 6c ASSOCIATES Z I R V I N E I N C %ANNING ENLINEEBINC 9l1RVEYINL Three Hughes lrol , CA WI Hf: (949) 5830]59 PIk (949) Sg3t01g � GRAD/NG PLAN I VEST/NG TENTATIVE TRACT 72295 F:\0718\Planning\OA_Project\GRADING PLAN\0718P_GRADING PLAN. dwg 60 SCALE DESIGN SITE D 7�� 1p�� 13 F7.A C CG.4 i' .� .2 F 1 C5,7 C6.7 C5,2 C2. C9.(i C CA.7 CE l,2 L:! 'f U.7 C't4.f C 7 Cl 4 C2.B A.4 07,8 1,..5 C10.1 G13_ :15.2 0..f . C14.'L Cil.7C-.3 CUTFILL F d.4 1`0.7 3 CL1 7 CB.9 CID cl3.5 177 1 017.7 c16 9 015.0 CIS A C[ 6 440 C::, f," 3 ,3 C C3.0 C'i.0 Ct-- LJ. `u [I 5,n l;1/.11 019 C:19�9 C... 7 011 C� F)qAW VOLUME 4 159 f ■ 4099 570 CYS 870 0.4. 01,'/ Cd .9 C7.D S 04,5 05.9 .9 f. 117 ,U 073.0 015.7 CF C20.f 022.2 24 024.3 022,3 G18, C]].Fl0.1 L 1G 5 CYS 2 CI C4.7 06.4 '.,6 011.7 C13. CB 3 (12.' 016.1 B C2P 6 1,'23.2 G27.0 026.9 026.7 C24.A C2 t. 9 Cd.0 9 0 CEDL C13.2 7. 013.7 050.4 C'..0 C11_l .4.5 Cfe,d 56 015.3 017.8.0 L"7_.1 +"_.! C2tE_7 029.2 029.6 C30.0 029,3 C27.5 024.9 J6 C9_:; U; 0.9. C14.2 4.1 014,8 CI0,2 C 5 010,2 C CI C2U.s' :21.5 023,0 0.2 C20`c 114.2 G3F1.7 091.7 032 30,0 029. .P. 02:1 074-4 f..4.7 0 1:14.7 016. Ci6.7 C 6 019.1 A CA .C: CIO.1 020.8 .24.1 C i 0.2 C' ,. C32.0 C33.9 ['33.4 1:33.A .I'S '30,4 030.5 C31 8 C:3 .. C32.9 130.0 C2.0,U C27 :19,1 CO -7 CO. ash r .9 013 1 1:12.0 C1G.5 019 049.6 075.6 2' .5 CP2.1 023.0 024, 0.i C"1`0 0 C21.5 1,`24,::1 ? .[ .. .i.7 035.6 GAG. 8 C36,1 035 3 .4 031,6 032.1 l: 9.13 029,8 C71.Ci C::3a.0 f. .7 C"53.3 031.3 0.2. NOTE: i • BASED O THE J 20 12 AERIAL C^ Cie 7 CL9 5 G15 7 4 C22 5 F,?. 9 C2 3.8 0:3.7 C24 C25 2 027.5 CS 3 0.1 033.7 035.7 C96.I C37 7 32.4 07.3 C I.4 C, i C31.4 032 2 32 C3Q 7 C30.7 7 033.5 --34.7 C-34.9 C 2 ti C 7. C Cl C96.D 0;2].5 G25.d "29 1 C3Q,4 I; IS. 024 3 -,.4 1,'16.5 027 _ C26.5 077,0 0.6 029. f.' -_, C33.5 034.7 037.1 ['3fl.2 36 .7 "3!5.1 029.9 1:30.2 0.:1 B 5;31.2 C (1.9 C3].d '3U.P 031.,' G32.5 3.1 C34.B 1:35.6 C 0.4 0.1:.7 C: ..►RA OF GRADING- 28.62ACRES 0 9 {; 1'SA 2 I'4°i f C3F, 6 E3' 9 038.8 .35.9 035.4 036- 0.2 F 029.5 029,9 30,4 0.3 030,0 031,7 0.3 .4 030-7 031.5 ,32.9 0.3-1 077.11 35 H.6 CB 8 Cl. is SCALE.' 1 " = 60 ' C419EM1 07130113 03: 00 P. M. C 1,15 7 1,'1 7 023.2 629.8 039.1 0.3. 1 C3i ? 0..'9 _ L�,i. t1 1,26 5 l,c G�0.9 .29- - sj 0.2' G C, 4 C32.D 0;14.3 C3A 1 7i L 72 026.6 027,0 2 :iR,2 1,'36.1 1:3F.H 1:37.9 i.5 ,35.7 3.7 034,4 C 5.9 1`,3'.. 035.6 L'315.f 032.9 Ca 0:29.1 CLI.' 030.1 30.3 G:S1.A C' q [29.7 O'31:lL 1:3A.O '36 o 1:31,1 3 040 • 15. CS<7 04.`3 ..I CA. 1 010 A LL"1B.0 .0 3.2 0.5 C29� .33 5 G33.fi 033.3 032,9 .-3. 029 5 F 9. 030.5 C3i.i 034 7 C97.F.V ,37 2 C3B.9 37.5 033,5 034,0 [': .1 CY, 3 036.9 Cita 2 C•. V,1 C2B.5 029 3 030.0 G' I.- 030,8 (1:11.5 C 9.0 130.3 031.7 1,33.7 CG 7 G3B, ti C C. ..,1 C70.f f.:8.n 0.1 1,3 C5.5 1,'.5 CiP,B 020.2 1,.. 7. G3 5 032 8 032.4 C31.0 C31 0 C3QP C29 8 CAD,2 1,31. '"a.1` 094.6 C.' S 037.0 035,5 035.1. C". 3.0 C -...i 3J.6 034.1 C 7 C35.2 C35 7 C31 C2t1 •:8.7 G '.G C9U.3 I,,30.4 0'31.3 0. 1- 029.0 E31-3 033. C. 021 F ,21.2 C 0.1, 0 r I. .9 0'2.5 F3,A�70 1`5. F4.IS F2,5 C f:6,Q 1 1 G17.6 C25.B C25 '' 34 .`.i 031.4 030.7 029.9 026 8 L•2B.6 L"2'.8 f. ,4 C29.9 C 9 C35.A 035.4 C37 C37,B L34.! C32.5 032,8 C'-.2 C33. 1;3A. t 0.3 .D 27.8 ClB.S 1:2]. 0.2. 9 ti:3u,2 Cdi.0 [l.0 t' .d ,19.3 1,4 t ... 7 010.9 C15.7 1.7 C25 8 C26.3 C2i :3 .7 034.2 C29 7 C29.1 C28 .3 027 ,29.3 C25.3 C26 f 031.5 C34.0 C 3 C36,1 C37,O 0.3 .7 1:32.7 032,5 0.32 9 033.0 ''3 .P 033,7 034.:9 029 P 028,1 1`1 7 L'2.A 05.6 04.7 .. ., •, C .0 020.3 C?: C.r^ .. ;2 029-7 029-5 029 4 C26 0 020.0 C27.0 C29 7 '?� 0 L25i.0 C27 Y, 30.9 C 6 {:,-1.1.3 1,'35.1 036.1 'J C3� 031.6 C32.0 ry C 1`1 06.3 L .9 C4,7 C. - 0.1 .0 1,],n M. ,9.f I i _� [32,u C.. -i3..1 1,'3-. 1,'28. E23.7 4.}-.0 03,4 .3 .5 9 Ft6,7-.7 1`13.4 FIQ..1 FG.5 1`2.7 0.1 .,- • .5 C4... C4,7 CB,O 1 .A 019 i C' -7? C30 4 CY) 0 029.7 C29 C? '.;�.G 026 6 ,;:-.1 024.0 C23.2 22 .. 0'25.5 C29.5 Citi, '33.•1 C.d 4 1;34.6 035.6 C 5.5 C31 2 Cil1.`i C31.8 023.5 C 0.7.-0 E.],I'1 F]') 110. -2U 3 1`22 1`20 B 1`18,3 1`75 Q Fk3.5 1`10 5 1`6.14 '2 7 'S.B 1:7.3 1,11.'? 05.1 1,9,8 CSA, 073.6 013.0 0.7. 1,5.1 3. 7B0 -. " ... - ,.y" .- - 0. 3 '�6.F C2Fi e G20.b 027.0 0^2.,' G22.2 0.'2] 8 C 1`:',...0 026-7 7 1'7::: .!i t','J3..=. 1:3d.2 C15.F+. 3.7 '30.2 027- +., ..� 019.8 Si.S ., 7,d .4 .4 1`25,6 fi 0 1`24.4 F22.8 2}.,G 1`38.6 F-15.3 - 6 1`10.6 1`6 7 F. .3 1,'1 7 CY 5 Cf2 6 CP.4 1,'t-' Cill .3 f:'ES 07.5 .1 CE3. 019.0 C23.F C24.9 F; 2 6 C10.0 L .6.1` 0.6 Cb .2 GO.. '110,0 1,1,3,7 _ ,x.3.6 L2B,3 C30.A 030.7 28 02.1 ... C1f.6 0.1 CS6.3.3 C A. CIO 71` .q 4.9.' e 014.7 L'12.A C 7.1 Cif},4 f.l0,d C' .1 018,7 021.5 025.:3 024,0 e2 026.6 C._",7 027 G2G.1 14. 027.3 L' a -A �1. 9 020.1 [17 021.3 C27,4 0311,0 C32.0 0;33 0.3=4.3 C 2 027,0 I" .4 017 - CA.: F F_ 1`19.4 F27.d F. F26.4 F27 B 7.4 F26 7 F23,5 1`'1 7 F19 9 F17.3 F'11.7 9.. 1`1 0.7 C1`l. I? Cto. 9 C4,8 05 6 .7 Ct1.5 C18.3 C1l_1 Q C2 .700 .- - ��. a - 0..'7 G CfA.O 010.1 021,(1 C2a .3.9 C25.�. _2A.5 025.9 0.2 .0 C27.iJ ::: 027.3 027.3 Cr- .2 Ct7 4 077,9 097.4 0'7.0 07.0 029-5 092.0 C.� [:29.9 ''. .A 0.]7, 0.3, A ,3 F 1`30. 0 1`29.2 1`28 1`26-7 F2A,3 1`22 .3 5 14.1 1`70.3 FS.B 1`1 03.6 Fq F .p ',9 6 0.1.0 06.2 16.4 C12, [:1 6 10.0 CL0.S1 090.6 616.7 022.9 020,5 C32.3 [31 _i 026,6 r. H 1,17.3 016,3 .1 C12.6 Cll 4 0..3. C 1 7� - C.' I' a i 023 7 74.4 0.2 - .26.'.i ''7.7 C=' 1,27.3 02[.9 G2t5. :15,3 CI!-', 3 C1Ci,0 1,'1 ! C74.B C. 17.9 099.5 1,'20, [:76. 0.2, 3.7 3.5 .1 agv.�D.9 F _ 1`33.4 1`3 F34,p 1`32.9 F32� 1`33,-0 1`33.4 1`32 1 2B 124 F F2].O FlB 7 1`15 4 177.3 16.1 FO CS.A 7 F2 04.0 C.fE 1,13.7 CS3.5 013.3 C15 • C:;I .'.11 17..1 Ct3,9 (37. 1 C21.9 C29.5 C2C.9 L" GfA.4 11".T 017. (:111,9 056.1 CY9.3 07.0 .•9 -�] .2�. - b� 8 C 7.0 1',17.1 019- 027,7 ,I C24.s (;24.0 C26.1 C�7 028.9 C2F - ':±5.9 C25.A C 3.1 '12,4 C12.'.i C11.'a f. C14,6' 3.7 .9 F6,0 r,,5 ...3 1.1` F r_ 1`34 1`34.5 F35,6 F36 0 F36.P F36.0 F33,5 X9.5 .9 1`27.6 F29.B 728 9 F23.5 F r GLE 0 019-2 023.- C22�5 024.3 C:I.E - 023 2 _; 7.!1 .15.3 Cl6.7 022- 9•l C97�4 097.0 016. CS€../; .9 3 L; 1'9.2 018.0 018.4 '.3 .l . f P'17 -EI 619.1 ._! 022 '022,2 023.3 C; 5 023 ] C- 28,5 C 4 C25,C C24.fi 0.1 110-2 011. CG. 0.2, 70 1`12.8 F25, 1`3:. 1`37 137.9 'F 36.5 1`36.4 " 7.6 1`37,9 1`37.51`22.9 F2.3,7 F'24 B F25,6 ..7 1`2 .9 F. ! .9 Fl., 2 CIO I} [, 53.7 C28,6 C:)1-4 0.: ).9 C�.'6.5 L2f (i 0.,3 3 :e ,3 CS'".G C15 G CIO -7 19.1 C1 B.5 Cf8.6 015.9 C15.9 010 -18-•1 0:1.9,4 C'19.7 C20.0 L2Q.2 .0 C1B.1 S.7 C1�.� 019.. _ I . a _ r C 7 Cts 9 1,`77.0 1 4 0.2;_ '3 G21 .2 027,3 '2A '2G .5 C24.6 024.2 CF 9 '7-3 i:7 7 CF F 14,8 F .3 1` 5.3 F '.0 38-7 F3 F39.B F39.8 F40-3 1`3 F3;},y .3 3 F26.f 1`22.1 F18,3 F17,9 FI' 1 4 1`22.0 1`24.9 h2•I 6 F. .2 F F'fB6 r1.6 C27 r .7 031 :16.6 012.6 G93.3 074.1 ..7 CS7,2 011.9 018.5 L.. ifi .0 018,1 C1B.9 020.5 Cii,7 [.]7.' Cf7,_ B. Lf 8.1 L1l.0 1.17-., [, 6 17. - � a .4,1`] [: .7 C�7 2 [;3d C38.1Y ,31,1.2 3� 0 �3 -6 A 1`0 r - f C18.A C C1B.3 C19,3 021,1 20.3 17.5 017,9 016 C19,d 17.6 Clfi 018.] 071).6 19,6 C:'. G20.0 020.0 8.3 C19.3 C28.3 C2 C2A-9 E IS 06.9 0'.5.0 Cb A3 1`U.? �W 18.5 1`26 1`35. F .5 1`41.5 Fd1.5 F 1`i FAf .9 1`41.7 .` ,5 F34 .6 1`30.1 F24.Q FIS -2 1 F Ff4.D VIA F15,1 1`17.0 F1B.7 F 9 A 12 1 f `7.11. 2. [;10.7 -21.` (:: 1-1 037.•1 0:70. L3B. � ,37.p t3� fl 1,11 3 L1(V.9 [,11,3 012, ' Ctd,S .I.7 3.8 _ J CIA.1 0..1 GE9.5 '18-5 C19 Q 0.1 cit., E- 011.3 ,6.6 G2,' L;1.1 C3. r, = i F17.2 F25.2 F33.4 '40 , 1`4 F43,2 F'42.6 F42.5 3.5 1 F39.A F35,6 F31.1 1`2 5.d F12 4 F9.7 F9.0 F9.0 F'-9.5 F9.9 F12,0 F 2.6 FS 7 FO .13 :� 5 C.33.0 0.3 4 C 0,9 0.4 .5 0..4 FI [:301.3 -13.9 09.2 (:9 6 011.0 3.4 [;13_ 012.3 Ci3.2 013.5 :' 3.`} 037.3 +� -.., 1 .3. C'U_D 0.2 G76.3 '19,4 CiG r 010.3 CiA,6 -' `' 7d0 -I 7 C20.: '7.5 01'7,8 1,'9 018.6 CIA 0..1,6 029,5 1.1:1,8 _1 C]C3.3 03,4 1`3. 0,9 F C0.5 00.8 .5 F .3 F3f..8 F-18 „ 42,5 F42, 3.7 F43.5 f 4 .3 F39,A 1`3613 F'3 7 1`22.0 FI 1`90.5 h'B. F5 �a 1`4.0 F4.0 3 F5.1 F5.9 5.7 F.4 GO 017 8 03.0 032.7 038.7 V. Il C'�:I [.1.0 1,.3.1 + C.i.7 i;r. 07.7 08.5 0.`1.-. 012.11 0.7 012.1 093,2 C'i3.9 014.7 015.3 011.1 01`.1.'3 '.18.b 1.'11., 1 1 rz. b❑ - 015.0 Cl [:1f1.9 C'19.0 0.'2 0 019,6 C2C.0 C 9,/ 017.0 1'17.7 Cie. C 9 c;,1.0 C22.1 021.7 020.' C CA F1.5.5 18.3 F 1`17.7 F13 1 F5.9 .6 F2.0 1`1, F7 A F26.!,� 1`35.8 f-4 .6 F49.9 F44.0 F44. -45, 4 .3 1`40.4 F36,8 F' .2 1`27.4 1`22.3 F16.5 Fit ,2 79.9 FD. _ F0,2 FD.fi ' ..1 C d.6 I' 7.'3 C .1 .7 : 3. i'.:] .19.7 C- i A .29.5 1`.6 1 0.5 3 CG.3 .13.8 0.9. C 03.3 070.6 012.2 013.5 2 - / ❑ (f / C: .1 C f Fi_3 "73.9 C3D.G 455. 037.4 33. C. 0 08.8 G€i G .7 0.5. C7.I .O 06,4 C9. 9 031.5 013.0 G14.5 117.tS Cf .6 C .0 021.1 1:20,0 I'r1 .5 C2.1.t7 i.A 016.9 C B.G 021.] 024.8 ] I:Ei. 1`22 F 1`21.5 F2P .2 1`73.9 1`19.3 Fit .7 1`7:1`42 7 .7 F46.0 P44.9' F43.4 F'. 1. F3B.8 F34.A 27 1`21.9 1`19.. F15,7 F10.0 F4.8 C3.E. L CS.0 1`;S .O C2.ti 1 ep C16.A 015,5 .0 021.0 C 2C21.4 021.5 1..0 C.16,5 C19,5 C20.1 C19 02,11 D F2U. 1`2. 1`25. F24.5 F24 5F24.5 F24.2 1`22. 16, '12.5. F10,5 FO .7 1`12. 32.. 1`41.3 FAA.2 1`43.2 FA2, F41.7 F'7. F32.7 1`27.6 F .6 1`19.2 1`75.1 Ff I.. 1`'1 3 F9-2 .8 F3-2 C3.0 C6. 6 CS.d; C(I,7 1A.7 G. C2B,6 33.3 1,'3 31` 2 c .f, 4.7 C2�1 04.6 Lv �.7 0.7.. 06.6 07.0 09.5 010.6 092,3 0.1 3 .- 0.1COCS 014,'7 0.17.6 L. J.9 C21,1 C20.9 C21.5 C20. 075.6 C17.4 F J F ' 15.9 1`'27.4 1`26-0 fLIVU 2 126.5 F25.8 1`25.0 1`2..4 F l,B F15.6 F13.f i ..6 29. F39,0 F 4,3 F41.9 F39,5 1`37.2 �.4.5 31.2 F29.1 1`,. 22.5 FIB,8 F15,5 FID -5 F 3 1`1.2 C2.3 G3.9 C5. ]' 1,'.5. 2.0 l 028.0 21] =1 (..! 6 (:�. f:1i, .1 l.0 9 LC -A 1 1,5.7 05.3 CO.G9C 09.9 C1D,6 .` _ 3.3 F .0 23.A 1`'2 ,9 1`30,3 -2 1`30.0 f29,A F28.D 26.4 P2$.5 1` 2 F .a 1`18.6 1`17 A, F F .A 10. Fbp,3 1`42. 1`42.7 IFAO.2 F36 G I'3D.G 1`27.7 1`24, F 1`18,1 1`13.7 1`9,1 F 1`[1, C :i -.7 05.4 P_ 09.0 04,3 016.. (;79 ,20 .7 Ci'. - C d.1`'+ C .6 CE+.7 '9.0 CA 03,2 C4,2 C7.2 09,5 Cl 4 1:12.8 10.0 2,4 ClC15.7 CSA. <:21�1 9.5 C19.5 C16.2 A.1 C2,3 C2:,6 L 05.7 06.9 t:11.f, Ci'. C71),2 011. C13.2 1:15.3 11.4 020.- is C17. 2 10,6 F30 F .0 F32,5 F32.5 F32.5 31.1 F29.5 F28.0 1`26 '..9 1`20.2 Fig 1`79.8 F 1`.I 10,5 F42.1 F41,6 1`41.7 F41.s 1`39.9 - F25,4 F21.2 F 9. 15.5 FS1: F6.7 r 1`0. C4,3 C7.5 -.5 ,.6 4.5 Cu 1,'92.3 015.' 1:15 _ 0.7.] 1. 1;15.8 96.0 I; 1r.4 F .5 FO'.6 1,'0.: 0.`.i 5 - �y9 s� b 1 " i:4. ;3.3 02.3 02,3 02.3 03,5 C 7 L']7.•I C9.1i 09,8 1:14.1 "11.4 012.2 [:1-.5. ' 1,'15.3 0.3. 1`'9, 1`12. F .7 : 4.1` 1`34.2 1`]1 i.7 1`33,5 F32.6 1`32. 1`'71. '.6.' 1`23.4 1`21.9 1`20,`3 1`19.0 F-" 25 F .3 1`42.4 1'42.E 1`47.4 1`39.6 1`3. .5 1`29,3 F;74.f 2 .1 1`18.6 1`14.0 A.A FA.B 62. 1, C1.S1 06.1 0.9.' 05.9 03.0 .4 013.0 C aU 0 [: 1E.;1 r.9. 12.7 Y- 1 .2 1`10.5 1`3 0 1`5, S 1.�� 1,10,3 0,12, .lA, CIA f 0:74.1 Ci. P5 6 59.7 Fit 9 F2 Me .2 ci 3 C1.3 01,13 C2,7 CA. i7 09.1 CJ ' ca.a C9,3 C9-7 1, .3 et$.1 L"12,2 1 F1D F14 2.2 35.0 F35.3 1`35-6 F35. F34.0 1`33. 1`20.3 1'26.1 F24.2 F22,7 1`21.' F F ,7 41 F40.5 FAC 2 O. 1`42.1 FA 1,5 F 9 1`35,5 1`34.0 F 4. 21,1 F17.7 1`12.6 1`7.5 '1.3 C3.2 L'7.A CB.6 02.6 '1"i C 4 i .1 012 l 3 5 53.9 1`2.5 1`10.6 1`7.9 :1`d 1`0. C0.7 01.5 C3 4 C4.3 7 Cti. `, C7.5 08.2 C8 3 C6.6 CG.O .050.2 F _6 F 34.4 F36.6 F FSB.5 F36-1 F 2 3b,A F S 1-29.7 F2B 9 F28.F28.5 F25 F F31.6 1`35 FR. B 2-4 F40,5 F39.5 F39.5 40., f 1-3A.G F36.2 F F2B.2 5.1 F16.4 F12-0 .9 1`2.2 .2 `.2 GO,B 0.]4 1`i C'30j.9 015 :S Cl 3 =_.' I d'2.'S 0-2 F via 1 6.2 F1.0 0.3 C1.2 C3.3 C3.2 05.9 CL.. 06.3 C6=6 00.9 CID.$ CB. 6 .7:9 3.5 F .3 F35,5. F3B,5 1`38,3 F27,8 F 2 F36,2 "1.- 1`31.5 F30.7 F30.i F „ 1 317 2 .2 1`27. F31.8 F37.7 1`39,1 1`39.2 3.3 F40.4 F'39.4 F .9 1`36.0 F37,7 1`3 :7 F .5 F27.2 1`21.4 9.9 .4 F7-3 F2.4 C1.3 C5.: r.•'.`l 1119.6 019 •t I; 15,G C1,1 4 F3.1 F2.8 FO,6 Co 9 02.9 "3 3 F11,0 F2.B FO. C6.6 C1.9 [ 1 5 C5.6 1:4.:7 C4, 5 1,'5.1 08.0 G10 _ 2.6 1`14.6 26.' 1`38. 1`39,2 6.9 F38.6 F36.0 F37-4 -4. F32.7 F32 3 1`32-0 F .tl 1`32.1 FF29.4 F2fi .5 1`,5.8 F32.7 F=7.5 1`37,0 F37.0 F37-0 Ai.i F. r36.B F35.9 1`36 9.1 F35.9 1`29,5 1`2^c .0 15.6 G.2 F6,1 F3.4 .4 C5.0 2 0 FO d 01.1 0 C3.I G2 2 1=7,1 1`9 1`0.8 01.5 1:4,0 C"e. C13.2 C2.A C4.1 !_' -IA.il 1`]6.5 1`3 1`4 .1 Fdn.2 F40.2 1,39.8 38.0 F.36.3 F34.1 F33,6 1`33. 5.7 1`34- F30.7 F26.9 F24.0 1`2 .6 F27 9 F .9 1`33-0 F.33.3 F33.3 1`3' 4 1'35.9 F36.5 1`34. .3 F 1`35.2 F31.8 F24.8 F17.0 '11.13 .4 F4.F FU- C 5 F C CI 0 0.1 C,3.9 C3 0.7 / Ck. F9,4 F7.5 FO, .7 C3.2 0..3 C1- C1,5 0 1`16. F1B.F F .4 F .6 F41_ F41,1 F40.6 F40.0 F39.5 -3 F35 4 F35.E 1`34." .5 F35.S 1`33.0 F29. 1`24.9 1`22.1 2�a.2 0-6 1`27.5 F�'.9 1`2B.0 1`26,0 25.1 1`31.3 1`33.8 .9 1`35.1 1`33.5 1`3 1`92.3 1`28,3 t4.2 F7,0 FO •C" -� 019 5 '3 2 .4 09.2 0.1 7 „3.51 I;4 ti C3�6 C3.6 C2.g F 1`.G F,. 0.7 U 0.:::'.0 C' 4 1,0,1 15. 1`2 1 F22 9.1 43,2 Fd2.9 1`42.5 F49� 1`40.7 1`3 -i'6�5 F33.5 F36.6 F39 37.6 5 F34 F31.3 F27 -1 24,c^ 1`28 3 30.2 F28,1 1`24.7' F29,9 1`'0. 1 2 Fie,I F22.B 3 1`34.7 F34.6 F33.5 f34.3 1`29. 1`22-9 471 1`'7.2 01.1 2 =t9. C 7 01,3 Cl I C-2 CA 0 2.0 Cl:. '.5 03.3 ('2.8 1.1 F8.6 F• 1 - 0,4 FS9 F .5 F 3 41.3 44.5. a,9 F43.2 F42,6 F41 .6 1`4 "37.A F37 4 F37,0 F35, B 3 1W,1 136.0 F' B F29 5 28-1 F" 3 F26 B 4.9 F25 9 F22I F1B.5 F Fit,0 F11.0 FS F24, F30..7 F31,0 1`2. F F. 9 F ,B 1`7.6 ..9 C.1 5 01.7 (',1.11 C3 B C4 02,1 Ci 9 Cf .S 0.1 t 02.4 F2.7 F7.4 .9 F13,2 F21 Q F3-.0 FA1.7 'F45,3 F44.5" F44,0 3.7 F42.6 F .0 F= F36.2 F37.6 F36.5 F. 0 1`:16.1 F35,3 F34-5 1`30 9 -32 F 9 1 F27.0 F25 5 F22 7 0.2 F19.5 1 FB 0 1`5.3 F3. F" .2 1`17. F 7. 1`21.7 19,1 F .3 1`4. 4.8 L'. 03.2 Cd.3 0.4,' 0.2 3 CI -11 11.4 01,1 CO.B [0,1� 0.1.5. F6. Ft5,6 F20.4 .3.5 F 5.7 F4,0 F44.9 F44.3 F43-7 F43.2 .5 1`41.7 D. F3B.5 1`37.7 1`30.7 6. 1`36 0 1`35.3 1`32.2 1`:4. 1`30.5 1`27.4 25, 1`23.6 1`24,5 F1E'• 8 1`6 a F4,7 1`2.5 '4 1`4.3 1`9 '! 1`1 1`10 1`0.7 1`3. .. F. - 3ry O 0.0.- Cf .9 0.3 3 4,5 Cd ti 0:j.4 C4.A Cd 1 '.3 0.1.4 1`,9.:? (:1 0 00.7 CO. 1`3.5 1`13,4 1`11 4. F.-.1 1`3'.9 1`42. F44.4 1`43.9 1`43.5 1`43.3 1`43 1`42.5 F42 F36,d 1`37.7 136.5 1`35,0 F 7' 33.8 F 8 1`32.7 1`29.5 1`26.6 1`23-A 19. F -.1 1`8.6 1`5.`3 1`5.5 1`1.- 1`2,6 F2 .0 1`6.1 Flt. FO Ct !1 0.1 3 CS 0 cU.6 .0 1:4.3 C9.2 6 CO F1.9 F9-0 F]D=9 F.16.E1 8.4 F 2 40.5 F FA3,5 F43.5 F4 F43.D F42.5 F42,0 A F33.0 F36.0 F35.3 1`32.4 F3Q,2 2 1`30: F20,7 F25 0 5 1 F9,3 FG 5 F5.2 F2.4 .B .3 F6,I tj2 F0.9 Cq,4 1`0.2 .3 C4 .0 C2.3 fi7. 1`2.0 Fd.7. F7 8 F13.5 Ft7. F31. 1`32.2 -35.5 35,3 F o ] F43.2 F43,2 FA2.7 F42.1 41.5 FA0.3 .7 F31.2 F'29 2 F2fi 4 1`24. F 4 14.9 Fit.8 1`8.0 FR 7 1`3 'S FO 03.9 1:li.'! .1 CO.A C2.2 0.6 P3-9 1`1.4 F1516 F17.1 F35.5 F34.2 -32.9 39.0 43.3 F42, 1`42,2 1`41,5 F40.1 F39,6 7 8 3 F' -2A-3 F25 1 F24 2 F20,2 F17.1 F12 7 FB.6 CA 6.3 1`2.3 Cf.. C2.I C6,1 09.4 .150 F0. FO,4 F0.9 ?.?_ 1`3. '.0 F8.3 F10.7 F18, F14.9 F15.4 -iB. F28. F30. F 1 F -,5 F•12,3 F40.9 F4U.0 F" .4 F33,7 F31.5 F30. 5-6 F2Q,9 F29.2 F15.4 Ft0.6 F7 F F4.4 FO. C3.4 G7 C9.b dl.1 C3.'1 F0,6 F3.2 I F7.: Fit.4 F12.7 F13.6 14,8 F14,0 .3 "-8.6 -33. F39.' F40,7 Fall F35.5 F31.0 F30.I F ;4 1`26 d -'2- F1B.1 F15..1 F7.3 F2.9 8 C9.7 C5.91 C -0 CF,.4 ry00 C3.1 y>@ 1`0.6 F2.F F 1`3.3 F7. 12.2 F13.2 F1 8 F12,13 F 4 F, f F34.2 .1 F29.5 F20- F27,8 F22.0 FPO.3 FS 6 F15.A 11 7 F5.B F1 3 C2.A '3 7 C 0 C3. C1.5 F4.7 F1 7 F11.3 F11.. F8.9 F6. f22.4 .4 F21.p 2?- 3 25.3 F29.5 1`21.6 F15.7 F14. F13,9 F12'.1 1`9 1`5.2 FO - C:4.2 C .0 C2,2. CO.. F3,0 F7. F7,6 F7.1 4.6 F2.L FO. 1`9 F7 FS 2 25. F17,5 F12.1 F9.p F7 5 F5.4 F4.7 F2.6 1,3 CA. 0.5 F3.9 F2.7 1`.4 4:. C2.9 F7.5 Fl,_ .O F19.5 F12.1 .8 15.2 F2-2 F0. C �e .0 1, 2.0 02,9 .7 F4.0 1 2 F9.'. F6.3 F2.0 C2.0 C3.3 C2.0 CO 0.5 l_9 f"1,'.1 1`6.9 1y.6 F .3 1`0 3 C -2 0.'CO .. 0 LANDSCAPE/BERM AND FENCE TO PROVIDE BUFFER FROM BREA � r 4k: � � • CANYON ROAD EXISTING FLOOD CONTROLCHANNEL SECTION II t CA: e SECTION A -A SCALE 1 =20 , 'SITE D' ARK SITE OPEN SPACE PARK WITH BENCH GAZEBO AND PICNIC - PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN FACILITIES CITY OF DIAMOND BAR CALIFORNIA ' SCALE: 1" - 40'_0" SUMMERS//MURPHY & PARTNERS, INC. HOMES C � ARCHITECTS C S 34997 COAST HIGHWAY, SUITE 200 5 ENTERPRISE, SUITE 300, IRVINE, CA 92655 DANA POINT, CALIFORNIA 92629 (949) 443-9446 NORTH 0 40 80 120 160 DATE: 7131/2013 SNIP # PROJECT PROF/LES (VERTICAL & HORIZONTAL SCALE: V" 60') LEGEND VIEW PROFILE #1 VIEW PROFILE #4 ----- NATURAL GROUND DESIGN GROUND 2 PROPOSED GRADING PROJECT BOUNDARY LINE TOP OF SLOPE 840 800 760 720 680 640 u�V Summar 800 Soo- 760 7s 720 720 240 280 320 MSE WALL MSE A OSED PMSE OWAL POSED RETAINING WALL HEIGHT 31 NING WALL - a� P / 1 \ 800 660 CENTERLINE 1009 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK 5,140 DW PROPOSED WATER 640 � RETOA CLUSTER UNITS XISTIN :.z � 00 h O ENHANCED PAVEMENT p 5 PROPOSED SEWER OPOSE " a 8 ST. .PLAN 3 29 PROPOSED -SD- PROPOSED STORM DRAIN .,Lr v 6.0'- 720 5' RIK RETAINING WALL/ 4-PLEX 2 FIRE HYDRANT 40 ---- PROPOSED '16-18 SUBTOTAL 61 18 182 4,924 PR Lot 10 PROPOSED pl ml ADE - lO WON,' BLVD. MSE ALL P Pad + 7082- _- ;P.d=76 46 5,683 - - 0 . xisi 47 ----- EXI ---- TING G --- - ADE -z ad=757.. ---- "A" ST. Pad 60.0* 26 0' Pa =766.0' m P PROPOSED GRADE 4645 28 6,414 PRC POSED MSE WAI LPadI Lot 49 Lot 441 GR d=711 2 > N ¢ I N I� hm p PR POSED MSE W LL _ + Lot PROW "A"S ED . - Pad= + PROP 'A' ED T. ad=774. s Lot 2 ,- Lot 4 Lot 24 ____ ____ mi0i p ---_ km -- I ROPOS 11.N D PROPOSED MSE ALL _____!ROPOSFD ACCESS OND BAR PROPOSED AC __ ESS ---- PR P ACCESS ---- SED ---- ---- - - - =727.5 --- ------- ---- ---- -------------- ' BLVD. j ------ Lot 6 -- ---- ---- E EXISTING STING o_ ARK I XISTIN ---- ---- 1 1 ---------+ _ry2 C BREA N. RD. I BREA CY . CHANNEL i _ RAIN 'PARK ,,-- RDEN BASIN P - d-7083 Lot 1 PROP Pad- L 08.6- t 1 WALL Pad=7 Lot 7.8' Pad= L 07.4' 1 ISTINC GROUNDM P OPOSE RETAIN NG WA PR L POSED GRADE r: p m 40 RO 190 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680 720 760 800 840 880 920 960 1000 1040 1080 1120 7760 1200 1240 1280 7320 1360 7400 1440 1480 1520 1560 16 u�V Summar 800 Soo- 760 7s 720 720 u�V Summar N ¢ pPad--754A"ST. PLAN TYPE # OF BLDGS. p PROPOSED F' H' LOT LINE 240 280 320 MSE WALL MSE A OSED PMSE OWAL POSED RETAINING WALL HEIGHT 31 NING WALL - a� P / 1 \ 800 660 CENTERLINE 1009 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK 5,140 DW PROPOSED WATER 640 � RETOA CLUSTER UNITS XISTIN :.z � 00 h O ENHANCED PAVEMENT p 5 PROPOSED SEWER OPOSE " a 8 ST. .PLAN 3 29 PROPOSED -SD- PROPOSED STORM DRAIN .,Lr v 6.0'- 720 5' RIK RETAINING WALL/ 4-PLEX 2 FIRE HYDRANT 40 ---- PROPOSED '16-18 SUBTOTAL 61 18 182 4,924 PR Lot 10 PROPOSED pl ml ADE - lO WON,' BLVD. MSE ALL P Pad + 7082- _- ;P.d=76 46 5,683 - - 0 . xisi 47 ----- EXI ---- TING G --- - ADE -z ad=757.. ---- "A" ST. Pad 60.0* 26 0' Pa =766.0' m P ADO R. 4645 28 6,414 Si of Lot 1 1 4,763 Lot 49 Lot 441 GR d=711 u�V Summar N ¢ pPad--754A"ST. PLAN TYPE # OF BLDGS. p PROPOSED F' H' LOT LINE 240 280 320 MSE WALL MSE A OSED PMSE OWAL POSED RETAINING WALL HEIGHT 31 NING WALL - EASEMENT LINE P / 1 \ 800 660 CENTERLINE 1009 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK 5,140 DW PROPOSED WATER 640 � 4,857 CLUSTER UNITS XISTIN :.z � 00 Iq ENHANCED PAVEMENT 750 5 PROPOSED SEWER OPOSE " a 8 ST. .PLAN 3 29 PROPOSED -SD- PROPOSED STORM DRAIN .,Lr v 6.0'- 720 5' RIK RETAINING WALL/ 4-PLEX 2 FIRE HYDRANT / , n v 'r?r1 Ll Ala. 25DDI ' 60x70 LOT V/C/N/TY MAP .. 00 \\\ AO \ PROPOSED 8' / NOTES VIEW PROFILE #2 �p _ - - NATURAL ND PROPOSED GRADING A V A SIDEWALK , Boo- 760 - 680 00 _ _ _ \ \ \ F \ TO BE RELOCATED SINGLE FA MIL Y \ 7C EX. POWER POLE 760 Tz0 680 Summar N ¢ pPad--754A"ST. PLAN TYPE # OF BLDGS. p PROPOSED F' H' 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 PMSE OWAL POSED RETAINING WALL HEIGHT 31 PLAN 1 24 24 511 P / 1 \ SEWER DRAIN LOW PLOW MP -40 MEDIA FILTER 660 47 1009 SINGLE FAMILY 5,140 / DIVERSION STRUCTURE TREATMENT BMP 640 � 4,857 CLUSTER UNITS XISTIN :.z � 00 PLAN 1 18 I� lope a / , n v 'r?r1 Ll Ala. 25DDI ' 60x70 LOT V/C/N/TY MAP .. 00 \\\ AO \ PROPOSED 8' / NOTES VIEW PROFILE #2 �p _ - - NATURAL ND PROPOSED GRADING A V A SIDEWALK , Boo- 760 - 680 00 _ _ _ \ \ \ F \ TO BE RELOCATED SINGLE FA MIL Y \ 7C EX. POWER POLE 760 Tz0 680 � i 760 V A O EX R/W b' t06 'F? ' ' Al � v A A EX, CURB &� o � ,T, o PITCH• ry /� �PROPOSED CURB �m R m 2"erNL 720 \ \\ \ \ \ PROPOSED R/W go \ \ -EXISTING 8"" SEWER \ \ ` / 0 �X, SIGNAGE TO BE RELOC9TED ,� 1R5 \�\ RL 680 •,,\ o 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680 .720 760 800. 840 880. 920 960. 1000 1040 1080 1120 \� o - �• / Ps �`' \�` Y _r ) y n \\ CONNECT 70 EX. 10" ACP WATER 8�`�p' ^ / •.:.- 90 35 / 5 \ \\ m l r�r� l Alii. 32D i EXISTING 8 SEWER R \ $ 9 VIEW PROFILE #3 PROPOSED GRADING A'\`BP V-9 )y r' BaoNATURAL PROPOSED MEDIAN p O,` &., / 15 RrN 5 \ r \ �\ dJ IYJ-J JAM, J� ✓� �J 7'0 -58 ^ w 800" 760 720 680 Summar N ¢ pPad--754A"ST. PLAN TYPE # OF BLDGS. p PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY S.F 6 DETACHED 60X70 30 PMSE OWAL POSED 5,295 31 PLAN 1 24 24 511 P "A" ST 491 SUBTOTAL 47 1009 SINGLE FAMILY 5,140 34 _-------- 11 4,857 CLUSTER UNITS XISTIN :.z � 00 PLAN 1 18 I� lope a /r --------------------------------------- 16 OPOSE " a 8 ST. .PLAN 3 29 PROPOSED 401 SUBTOTAL Pad=7 6.0'- MULTI -FAMILY UNITS 39 4,462 4-PLEX 2 8 40 ---- Lots - '16-18 SUBTOTAL 61 18 182 4,924 PR Lot 10 PROPOSED 5,159 ADE - 5,022 WON,' BLVD. 5,347 of 29 ' Pad + 7082- _- 5,731 46 5,683 - - 0 . 5,419 47 ----- EXI ---- TING G --- - ADE -z - -- ---- - WALL 5,911 26 _ a 50 m 27 15 631 -- 4645 28 6,414 Si 5,160 Lot 1 1 4,763 � i 760 V A O EX R/W b' t06 'F? ' ' Al � v A A EX, CURB &� o � ,T, o PITCH• ry /� �PROPOSED CURB �m R m 2"erNL 720 \ \\ \ \ \ PROPOSED R/W go \ \ -EXISTING 8"" SEWER \ \ ` / 0 �X, SIGNAGE TO BE RELOC9TED ,� 1R5 \�\ RL 680 •,,\ o 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680 .720 760 800. 840 880. 920 960. 1000 1040 1080 1120 \� o - �• / Ps �`' \�` Y _r ) y n \\ CONNECT 70 EX. 10" ACP WATER 8�`�p' ^ / •.:.- 90 35 / 5 \ \\ m l r�r� l Alii. 32D i EXISTING 8 SEWER R \ $ 9 VIEW PROFILE #3 PROPOSED GRADING A'\`BP V-9 )y r' BaoNATURAL PROPOSED MEDIAN p O,` &., / 15 RrN 5 \ r \ �\ dJ IYJ-J JAM, J� ✓� �J 7'0 -58 ^ w 800" 760 720 680 840 <O\ Z '. S`p1PM Y,yps1 , `�\• o> > s 3y8'\ \ Nei EX SIGNAGE TO BE = �-1 gym\ To BE RELOCATED 800 lrStl\i:l AIL- 331411y o S a �R' � 0 „+ � AA• ROti I v PROPOSED SIGNAL .QW o y ® s N • 1V• ps11 o i� cn� CONNECT TO EXISTING R" 7s6 10" s _ r 1\5 20� s. '�\ \♦ r P' 6 o �kd ". pgRpONDP 1� i 720 v W 65 - .� St IRA \ w .. ps12 . r �l (y ps1395 \ ----R \p WSMt BUILDING SUMMARY Vo 30" LANDS P s 7 .^ 9 2 P 10 g No � Summar I of Areas PLAN TYPE # OF BLDGS. # OF UNITS X OF TOTAL SINGLE FAMILY S.F 6 DETACHED 60X70 30 5,127 CLUSTER UNITS 5,295 31 PLAN 1 24 24 511 PLAN 2 23 23 491 SUBTOTAL 47 1009 SINGLE FAMILY 5,140 34 CONDOMINIUMS 11 4,857 CLUSTER UNITS 4,235 12 PLAN 1 18 18 251 PLAN 2 26 16 351 .PLAN 3 29 PROPOSED 401 SUBTOTAL Pad=7 6.0'- MULTI -FAMILY UNITS 39 4,462 4-PLEX 2 8 40 6-PLEX 9 a oe OW SUBTOTAL 61 18 OTAL # OF UNITS 182 4,924 PR POSED 43 5,159 20 5,022 "A" ST 5,347 of 29 30 45 5,297 _- 5,731 46 5,683 23 5,419 47 4,169 EXIS ING DE 4,808 25 MS WALL 5,911 26 _ a 50 5466 27 15 631 -- 4645 28 6,414 Si 5,160 29 1 4,763 GR I� hm p Lot 9 - (STING __----- -- ____ ____ --- -- ---_ --- -- Lr 04 S DI OND BAR . - - P OPOSE pa =727.5 BLVD. j Pates 25' Pa =7220* "e" ST. 1 1 PROP SED RE AINING WALL P OPOSE RETAIN NG WA PR L POSED GRADE m 840 <O\ Z '. S`p1PM Y,yps1 , `�\• o> > s 3y8'\ \ Nei EX SIGNAGE TO BE = �-1 gym\ To BE RELOCATED 800 lrStl\i:l AIL- 331411y o S a �R' � 0 „+ � AA• ROti I v PROPOSED SIGNAL .QW o y ® s N • 1V• ps11 o i� cn� CONNECT TO EXISTING R" 7s6 10" s _ r 1\5 20� s. '�\ \♦ r P' 6 o �kd ". pgRpONDP 1� i 720 v W 65 - .� St IRA \ w .. ps12 . r �l (y ps1395 \ ----R \p WSMt BUILDING SUMMARY Vo 30" LANDS P s 7 .^ 9 2 P 10 g No � Summar I of Areas PLAN TYPE # OF BLDGS. # OF UNITS X OF TOTAL SINGLE FAMILY S.F 6 DETACHED 60X70 30 5,127 CLUSTER UNITS 5,295 31 PLAN 1 24 24 511 PLAN 2 23 23 491 SUBTOTAL 47 1009 SINGLE FAMILY 5,140 34 CONDOMINIUMS 11 4,857 CLUSTER UNITS 4,235 12 PLAN 1 18 18 251 PLAN 2 26 16 351 .PLAN 3 29 29 401 SUBTOTAL 73 1001 MULTI -FAMILY UNITS 39 4,462 4-PLEX 2 8 40 6-PLEX 9 54 4,682 SUBTOTAL 61 18 OTAL # OF UNITS 182 4,924 1. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 8714-002-900, 8714-002-901, 8714-002-902, 8714-002-903 AND 8714-015-901. 2 EXISTING & PROPOSED ZONING: SITE D SPECIFIC PLAN 3. EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT 4, PROPOSED LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL 5. EXISTING & PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN: SPECIFIC PLAN, SITE D. 6. ALL STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND GRADING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DIAMOND BAR STANDARDS, ORDINANCES AND APPROVED MODIFICATIONS HERETO. 7. ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD SHALL BE ACCOMMODATED ON THE FINAL DESIGN, OR THEY SHALL BE EITHER QUITCLAIMED, ABANDONED OR RELOCATED TO THE SATISFACTION OF ALL INTERESTED PARTIES. DRAINAGE AND PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS NECESSARY TO SERVE THIS PROJECT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AND WITH THE UTILITY PURVEYORS. EXISTING STORM DRAIN EASEMENTS WILL BE ABANDONED DURING THE FINAL MAP PROCEDURES. & MULTI FAMILY BUILDING TO MEET NFPA 13 STANDARDS. 9. ESTIMATED EARTHWORK QUANTITIES: 415,500 CYS. CUT, 415,500 CYS. FILL. 10. SEWER SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT. 11. PER LA COUNTY FIRM PANEL 1880 OF 2350. 12. PRIVATE WATER QUALITY BAI TO BE MAINTAINED BY H.O.A. 13. LOTS 62 & 63 ARE TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR & MAINTAINED BY THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. 14. ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG DIAMOND BAR BLVD, BREA CANYON RD AND % 680 1' I 1 I - -- -. �3 A • ` • \ , \ PASADO ON. TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. "} - o ao 86 120 Iso zoo zao zao szo sso aoo aao aao szo 560 soo 640 sao 72o Iso aoo aao aeo azo TOTAL GROSS 247,342 S.F. _ $96 \ Ps - " "� - sl ' '� 2' ps1 .+ \\ \ ` - -- EX SIGNAGE TO BE -o '•' N P \ E 5.7 A0. 15 ALL TRASH IS INDIVIDUAL PICK UP BY WASTE MANAGEMENT. TRASH PICK UP .FOR / .Q h o ^ 5-(R <cy \ \ ✓ \ wP 5 AVERAGE GROSS 5,263 S.F.' 6' _ 1 i0 BE RELOCATED ry m o o \/ _ 0 Bm"0 \ \ q00 \ o j6 MSE LOTS 2 THROUGH 5 NEEDS i0 BE LOCATED ON "B" STREET. TRASH PICK UP FOR ,/ `"' a, o m - ` p§. _ �• .� s1 9 s1 \ \ l ps1 LOT i WILL BE ALONG THE LOOP ALLEY. 6" a i.6" Y ) _ r r RIGHT -OF WAY TO 'i p /`^ • P - CF.IPER /PLA N 6" 12" 12" J TO l vlr!'T Jva -T6r�r%I ��fJJ / OW BE DEDICATED i E - \ \ \ `° ""� p p p4 \ \ CITY OF DI D BAR � • 60 � ps1 \ 1 W5' LOTS 1-5 TO BE MAPPED FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES. - o e ,� \ c 1 ,,, 165 ✓� m � \ � \ P ps1 \\ � r \ R-3' PER PLAN / o / EX, 12" ACP WATER �5 1h"�•;. • Ps1 o a �, s� 0 w - \ �; 1 65 ` \• ` pW 17 STORM DRAIN SYSTEM TO BE PRIVATE. AO y UT/L/TY AGENC/E o / e / R _, - , 26 1°1p1°6 a9% \ P L9 Ot \\ •\�♦ Ps1 °' \� g• BN•nP SCHOOL DISTRICT: POSTAL SERVICE: R=1/2" R=1/2" FL R= 112* / l � _ En BE TO BE \ �/ OW ` - ' 0 'I WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WALNUT VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT USPS _. EXISTING TREES 70 BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED PER TREE SURVEY. el • '' ^ PROPOSED MEDIA / - / P \ �. s 16p • \ ��. ,. \ ps1 P \ \ ,. \ 1 271 S. BREA CANYON ROAD 880 SOUTH LEMON AVE. 1317 SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BLVD. - = ,' 413.P. w \ 1g15 • \• 0' 5 w4[ \ \ \\ WALNUT, CA 91789 WALNUT, CA 91789 DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 • :' __�� P09 POLE ? h i '� 2 / ( ) ( ) " Ex o , t . 1` - P° 9• \ 909 595-7554 eoD 275-6777 LOT SUMMARY �o .. TO BE RELO .. 10p �QI ♦ 14$ \ \ ♦ •. 6 PROPOSED SIGNAL l MoOlFica TION AT / PPROPosED R Rw -_ y , o o �//�'- . `�s q6\\ 1 ,, \797 A�o. wP♦s1 \ cs I i\ /\ �� 60 N� N� 6r5 \ •\ \ Y 2 5P \\ I1fDEpWONE SERVICE: TRASH: SINGLE FAMILY HOMES) SEWER SERVICE: TRUNK LINES Lot No. Land Use LdB ACtBB 24DIAMOND BAR BLVD. WASTE MANAGEMENT INC. LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT &BREA CANYON RD. 1400 PHILLIPS RANCH RD. 13940 E. LIVE OAK AVE. 1955 WORKMAN MILL ROAD LOT1 MULTI -FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO 62 3.3 ^ L� /y �p GUM - - - - LOTS 2-5 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDOS 73 5.9 4' ROLLED CURB k GUTTER 6 CURB & GUI ,C^ ` s _--- / m m W / e p •`\ \1 pot 53 / 11 \ N y 1� A (O )NA, - 91766 (800) 266-7551 (562) 699-7411 _ Ex. R w � ° � \\ BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 WHITTIER, CA 90507 ED 47 NTS NTS � _ \+� \\ '�t" o 2 . \ 0 1 g \\ 800 483-5000 - _" -EX CCURB _ .3' rt 121\\ „ 8 FK \ ` ` 5 \ \ P �• LOTS 6-52 SINGLE FAMILY DETACH 5 7 --- /` ,150 - \ I \ \ 118• `' 1'R' :.. p,1 3 " ELECTRIC SERVICE: (EOR REFERENCE ONLY) (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) EX. POWER POLE '� - - / --- " P \` s \y c�R� ' �' ^' �\ Ps 0 \' 1 ae 60 \ TRASH: (FOR MULTI -FAMILY) SEWER SERVICE: (MAIN LINES) LOT 53-57 SLOPES/OPEN SPACE 5.7 70 BE RELOCATED -� ^- "'-- - i `\ `\ 1\ ?\� P q % �-( 154 °>\ o\ \ o, ♦ 5 ps1 9• / -\ \ SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. VALLEY VISTA INC. LOS ANGELES COUNTY OF PUBLIC WORKS - --� -' rR \ • q � % RE��. � ps1 w se I � 5'<y'L 800 CIENEGA AVE, 13940E LIVE OAK AVE. SEWER MAINTENANCE DISTRICT LOT 58 PRIVATE STREETS 4.0 SAN DIMAS, CA V91773 1 BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 900 FREEMONT LOT // o $0 683 BE _^ ip' Z° \ �'ro P (800) 655-4555 00) 266-7551 ALHAMB A - 1 3�8 RIGHY-OF-WAVY 680 \- ps V1 �' �\ ". 1b0 ri LOT 62 6 RAIN AGARDEN PARK/BASIN 1 0�� / (8 RA C 01 p 4 1 �FMP-4o oRM DRAIN , \\ \ ps1 11 V-6 0 31 1 a o 1 0%` Rar r GAS SERVICE: 3' BE DEDICATED r THE / I 6 V - _�! 1 CABLE N: p p / µ1EDTA FILTER LOW FLOW , _ P 11 w. 1 w 11 ' \ 1 3 _ ✓ / 3' BROW IiY OF DI MOND BAR a / NREATMEN B P � 2/ SISION 10 s1�1 ' �<`'' Ps ` , " • ` 6� 1 Psj6 o m L r' ON H. TYP SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. TIME WARNER LOT 63 PARK 0.9 GARAGE __, - � P \� �- - \ � � I I `A`•- _ / 1919 S. STATE COLLEGE BLVD. 0, DOOR / r _ \ CTURE m .. 6 \ I o \ c / rr ryq, rr 1041 E ROUTE 66 RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATED TO 0.5 / \ \ \ - pyc� \ l X106 a - s is (800) 427-220006 �I 1 \v 1 S �c r� GLENDORA, CA 91740 TOTAL THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 182 29.9 �. 2% MIN 25 �-'----- :. ;t bc ,. _. \ l \. ,_. Q � 4 • s1 3 r� r' i�� s oti+ I \\ p rr BENCH MARK - a /. 4' 1'L 1140± _ P' •F'a, I f _ I 1 rr � '<�%`• / ' oA $ - - o <t ; � ; � '. 1 "' ` ps1 Ps ` m qc -' . I I I .5 /,? ,,,,0 2 I. r. LOS ANGELES COUNTY BENCHMARK NO. G 5073 ELEVATION: 726.809 DATUM: NAVD 88, Ex. CAL BUILDINGS 2005 ADJUSTMENT / 135 _ I I o \ ' ` 1 - i 3' TOE ) P/ SCALE. 1 "=50, D EX R W /i r • - ,. r, 740 - I / 00/ �. / ✓ ! ^ 'La r DESCRIPTION: EX POWER POLE / / yC�OP 0\N /,- / / . - '- / b F ..Et• � 1 � 2 s :� ps `n ' 'yo i r DITCH, TYP • TY /NGS �i` R, ' �. z9 R o 0' CURB DETAIL AND UTILITIES PR POgED CURB F �/ p _r� Q ? J y' �l LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TAG IN EAST CURB OF DIAMOND KITS TO BE RELOCATED / / -� / ;n p0 ' �� / / ,' / � " l - I � - /� %f' G \ -- / , r; ;� _ SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDO MULTI FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO BAR BLVD. 42.7 FEET EAST OF CENTERLINE AND 95 FEET NORTH OF CENTERLINE OF PROPOSED R/W / 10 sl .: ' g0E`'� i g •O ° r (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) / / /. / h /. , > P _ _--. /.., Ps o. \ b r ,% 110.2 - 111.0 CROOKED CREEK DRIVE. / �. / _ > 12 ? PEDESTRIAN l l / � / ^ Of o1 / 0 � � ° a � , m''z 1 1 ,38 (SSWALK / ep � / / � ' r 29. g5, \ -. � � Xr 107.7 41.5' 28.0' 41.5' CURB n / �p / "� / �A' / W >22 , s / \ O / A' i _;G'. X10 �'' A� �l`\\* q', 1 N'k r.r / - , \ cuRo LEGAL DESCRIPTION ( / A 10.0' W 26' r' ' \ - /5, >o - 9' 6 AQV_. r -c _ , ' r/ v r, 32' BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 9 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO / / / ,r e a :! 2 CP 5 / / r '' - �'ss,1b'51. // , / / 90 ` , Try'v� � rrr MIN. MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, GOUTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Ypr� o\S,gA•r ^.� 5- A1�' ',%'rY�• r % ,,:.1psI/ r-> B � �/4 �/ gp,0A7b =,� vv v vL.. .�P3', , 4' r / r' .r 5.5' 317" o w I 5.5 94.5' 2 D 7 DEVELOPMENT S TANDARDS L 38.8' BROW ARK PER SITE D SPECIFIC PLAN 5 / - e 14 7.5' 75' GFRE TRUCK s / 5.5' 4 134.5' DEVELOPMENT STANDARD/LOWMEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL REQUIRED PROVIDEDTURNING RADIUS DETAIL 4 XISTING NDERGROUND 10.0' MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS 200 182 Al MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE 60% 41.9% TYPICAL �- z°• 0 , . I ro 5.5' - \I - - /> 1 , ',_-- - MINIMUM YARD SETBACKS: FRONT YARD 10 FEET 10 FEET tAr REAR YARD 15 FEET 88 FEET*OFF-STREET PARK/NG QNTS p ,v ' 0/ 75. SIDE YARD INTERIOR 10 FEET ONE 10 FEET * SIDE 5 OTHER CURB 12,2' SIDE YARD STREET 10 FEET STREET 10 FEET 5 / SIDE 5 ON OTHER 5 FEET wNEEL9'- SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED (60X70) r LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS 15% 6. 3' To STOP \� // ^^m°/ \ g0 / /' ,' ,3 00' ` / �� r OITCw TYP PRIVATE LANDSCAPED AREAS 15% OS r i 1.. - 16° r'' / s. Tr'7r1Cr l2 )r/-Jrr- / // /(w /�', VQ0�- `70 �•' ;`/ j � /� , SS II I II II1 ?.ts�. m -% �^o\ I _ � �_ �„ o /41 /_ ry ^^ti. • `r \O. ^` or r 3r \ P16 010- X8680. 0�' 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK � COMMON LANDSCAPED AREAS 4'4% 18.8' TOTAL LANDSCAPED AREAS 59% .os >r.r A10 jr160 PARKING SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED ExsnNc RESIDENT PARKING 94 2 ENCLOSED 94 ESM7 5.0' -4 I 0'5.0' 700 SPACES PER UNT) 5.0GUEST PARKING 32 (1 SPACE PER 3 185 5.REQUIRED RESIDENT SPACES) ROW PARKING SINGLE FAMILY TYPICAL STREET SECT/ONS , RE 11. 2' 19.Q' CONDO/MULTI-FAMILY. DITCH, TYR 70.0' 19.8' RESIDENT PARKING 270 1 ENCLOSED SPACE PER 270 r SERVICE RO/D AND A _> 9 - O rr r� CT No, 2{JF�{� PEDESTRIA)V ACCESS ONLY - 1 BEDROOM UNIT, 2 ENCLOSED ' l EMERGENCY INGRE55/CGRE55 _ SPACES PER UNITS WITH 2 w ggqq OR MORE BEDROOMS) � <; / � � � j � � 'rl TCH, TYP Fe 0`)" E �`L /U/ GUEST PARKING 90 (1 SPACE PER 3 "11 19 3' TOE DITCH, TYP �� \-@" `� r s REQUIRED RESIDENT SPACES) y . w ` 'k �. A �� b� til` fz' EASEM Nr AJ --- -. - I \ 1. ? / 8' EASEMENT 2' 15.0' 2' TOTAL PARKING TVP/CAL ON STREET \ I \ / y iq, 1q•p• p• OS' EASEMENT D.5• 2' 12. e' 2' RESIDENT PARKING. 364 364 PARALLEL PARK/NG / ^a-. m` / os' os' 0.5 _ 0.5' NTS. GUEST PARKING. 122 296 � 3d' LANDSCAPE SETBACK v Pv �� / EMERGENCY 90 \ \ I ' ,`' 2'1 OP 7/ ,2 111 2 1 2111 CURB INGRESS/EGRESS ` \ / i6o % / / \ pK z, 4,pi z, » DEVIATION TO SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SETBACKS REQUIRED 1�1 fd' / \ Z` 0 �4.Y SWALE SWALE Z.1 1 'Na"Y E ¢ NORTHERLY CL SOUTHERLY \ `s' �y \\ AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM) R/w BERM ° R/W R/W R/W R/W 46' R/W R RIGHT-OF-WAY TO SECTION A -A ENTRY - PORTION OF "A" STREET (PRIVATE) SECTION B -B ENTRY - PORTION OF "A" STREET (PRIVATE) 50' 50' 8' 42' 4' 35' 8' i M DI IN I 3• 2,07 2.0% 6' CURB & GUTTER CURB 6" CURB & GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK SECTION L -L EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) WALL 54R/W 54' I BTDEDICATEDPFND BAR _ ' �� ,'- / SECTION 1-1 SECTION J -J SECTION K -K 23.0' 23.0' _ 27'0' 27'0' 27'0' 27'01 I/ o. k EMERGENCY ACCESS ROAD SERVICE ACCESS ROAD PEDESTRIAWSERWaACGESS ROAD 36'LOT 55 I 14.0' 26' 14.0' I ---�-- I / ' S' _ (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) IfA' 1A' S'I A. /r\\ '4- 10 IS 1 IS I IU 4 2' - 8' -- Br - 2' ♦- ,.", i /. PKWY PKWY Y 22 .,y 2� l��RKI p0 "55 SIDEWALK SIDEW QP v\ a• 32'31.75'SIDEWALK SIDEWALK 5 , I, J w wCURB & CURB & CURB �� ¢ GUTTER GUTTER t1 TETE" FL u FL FL cQi FL GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER 4' 28' 4' 3' 28' 19' 2.875' 26' 2.875' SECTION C -C SECTION D -D NOR STREET LOCA( STREET MIN. TRAVEL MIN. MIN. TRAVEL PARKING MIN. TRAVEL MIN. 'A' STREET - LOCAL STREET 'A' STREET • LOCAL STREET (TAPER) PARKING BOTH SIDES \, �$ ~D$ \ 1 PARKING BOTH SIDES NO PARKING (PRIVATE) 4" RourD D" cuee d" ROLLED 4" ROLLED 0' CURB CURB CURB 6"CURB CURB (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) r. ..� \ SECTION F -F SECTION G -G SECTION H -H 4 r � PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS R/W R/w 2' 11 I 50'54' I 42' 8' 4' 42' I 8.1 1 S MI I 1 2 ~ I oz z1 I cu K e R 6" CURB & GI/TIER' 8' SIDEWALK \-6" CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED 8" SIDEWALK -8" FOE ALK SECTION L -L PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) 50' 150' 35' 4' 45' M DIA I Mon m- 3 CURB -6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER - SECTION )I EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD (PUBLIC) r�PROPOSED w R/W RWROl4Yfd7S RW iib' I 5o' 60, 8' 1 1 8' 35' 4' 63 �1 3' M DIA, 1 _ _ MP% 201 2.0% 2'1 nmm CUR6 L PROPOSED 6" CURB & GUTTER RETAINING WALL 6 CURB & CUTTER 8' SIDEWALK 5' SIDEWALK SECTION M -M PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) 14" 35' MEgIAN 1/ 6" CDR:; URB fi CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 3' SIDEWALK SECTION N -N EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) PROPOSED RIPROYFIIENIS If►1 r�PROPOSED MPROWWMT9 R�106' R/W 50' 1 11 56' 156' 1 f 8' 42' 4' 1 41' 1 B'l 3' I MDII 3• LN I I Z.1 an1 2. 09, I I PROPOS! CURB L RETAININ 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER B' SIDEWALK PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK SECTION N -N PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD (PUBLIC) PRIVATE STREET PRNATF STREET TYPICAL PRIVATE DRIVE (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) AND FIRE LANE (PRIVATE) F � PROPOSED IMPROVEMEMS PEW 8 •. R/W T y 92' RI✓ 40' 40' 40' 1 52' 8' 32' 32' 8' 1 1 1 20% 201 20% mwww _ m_ WALL L 6" CURB & GDM°R 6' CURB & GU FR 6- CURB & GUTTER i 8 SIDEWALK '-EXISNNG'8" SIDEWALK 6" CURB &GUTTER SECTION 0-0 SECTION 0-0 EXISTING BREA CANYON ROAD PROPOSED BREA GANYON ROAD (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) DENSITY SUMMARY Summar I of Areas CONDO Lot No. S.F Lot No. S.F 6 7,867 30 5,127 7 5,295 31 6,674 8 4,945 32 6,329 9 4,928 33 5,346 10 5,140 34 4,408 11 4,857 35 4,235 12 4,761 36 4,227 13 7,033 37 4,230 14 4,902 38 4,232 15 4,646 39 4,462 16 4,328 40 4,652 17 4,682 41 4,715 18 7,473 42 4,924 19 6,095 43 5,159 20 5,022 44 5,347 21 5,214 45 5,297 22 5,731 46 5,683 23 5,419 47 4,169 24 7,196 48 4,808 25 4,577 49 5,911 26 5 214 50 5466 27 15 631 51 4645 28 6,414 Si 5,160 29 1 4,763 1. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 8714-002-900, 8714-002-901, 8714-002-902, 8714-002-903 AND 8714-015-901. 2 EXISTING & PROPOSED ZONING: SITE D SPECIFIC PLAN 3. EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT 4, PROPOSED LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL 5. EXISTING & PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN: SPECIFIC PLAN, SITE D. 6. ALL STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND GRADING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DIAMOND BAR STANDARDS, ORDINANCES AND APPROVED MODIFICATIONS HERETO. 7. ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD SHALL BE ACCOMMODATED ON THE FINAL DESIGN, OR THEY SHALL BE EITHER QUITCLAIMED, ABANDONED OR RELOCATED TO THE SATISFACTION OF ALL INTERESTED PARTIES. DRAINAGE AND PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS NECESSARY TO SERVE THIS PROJECT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AND WITH THE UTILITY PURVEYORS. EXISTING STORM DRAIN EASEMENTS WILL BE ABANDONED DURING THE FINAL MAP PROCEDURES. & MULTI FAMILY BUILDING TO MEET NFPA 13 STANDARDS. 9. ESTIMATED EARTHWORK QUANTITIES: 415,500 CYS. CUT, 415,500 CYS. FILL. 10. SEWER SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT. 11. PER LA COUNTY FIRM PANEL 1880 OF 2350. 12. PRIVATE WATER QUALITY BAI TO BE MAINTAINED BY H.O.A. 13. LOTS 62 & 63 ARE TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR & MAINTAINED BY THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. 14. ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG DIAMOND BAR BLVD, BREA CANYON RD AND % 680 1' I 1 I - -- -. �3 A • ` • \ , \ PASADO ON. TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. "} - o ao 86 120 Iso zoo zao zao szo sso aoo aao aao szo 560 soo 640 sao 72o Iso aoo aao aeo azo TOTAL GROSS 247,342 S.F. _ $96 \ Ps - " "� - sl ' '� 2' ps1 .+ \\ \ ` - -- EX SIGNAGE TO BE -o '•' N P \ E 5.7 A0. 15 ALL TRASH IS INDIVIDUAL PICK UP BY WASTE MANAGEMENT. TRASH PICK UP .FOR / .Q h o ^ 5-(R <cy \ \ ✓ \ wP 5 AVERAGE GROSS 5,263 S.F.' 6' _ 1 i0 BE RELOCATED ry m o o \/ _ 0 Bm"0 \ \ q00 \ o j6 MSE LOTS 2 THROUGH 5 NEEDS i0 BE LOCATED ON "B" STREET. TRASH PICK UP FOR ,/ `"' a, o m - ` p§. _ �• .� s1 9 s1 \ \ l ps1 LOT i WILL BE ALONG THE LOOP ALLEY. 6" a i.6" Y ) _ r r RIGHT -OF WAY TO 'i p /`^ • P - CF.IPER /PLA N 6" 12" 12" J TO l vlr!'T Jva -T6r�r%I ��fJJ / OW BE DEDICATED i E - \ \ \ `° ""� p p p4 \ \ CITY OF DI D BAR � • 60 � ps1 \ 1 W5' LOTS 1-5 TO BE MAPPED FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES. - o e ,� \ c 1 ,,, 165 ✓� m � \ � \ P ps1 \\ � r \ R-3' PER PLAN / o / EX, 12" ACP WATER �5 1h"�•;. • Ps1 o a �, s� 0 w - \ �; 1 65 ` \• ` pW 17 STORM DRAIN SYSTEM TO BE PRIVATE. AO y UT/L/TY AGENC/E o / e / R _, - , 26 1°1p1°6 a9% \ P L9 Ot \\ •\�♦ Ps1 °' \� g• BN•nP SCHOOL DISTRICT: POSTAL SERVICE: R=1/2" R=1/2" FL R= 112* / l � _ En BE TO BE \ �/ OW ` - ' 0 'I WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WALNUT VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT USPS _. EXISTING TREES 70 BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED PER TREE SURVEY. el • '' ^ PROPOSED MEDIA / - / P \ �. s 16p • \ ��. ,. \ ps1 P \ \ ,. \ 1 271 S. BREA CANYON ROAD 880 SOUTH LEMON AVE. 1317 SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BLVD. - = ,' 413.P. w \ 1g15 • \• 0' 5 w4[ \ \ \\ WALNUT, CA 91789 WALNUT, CA 91789 DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 • :' __�� P09 POLE ? h i '� 2 / ( ) ( ) " Ex o , t . 1` - P° 9• \ 909 595-7554 eoD 275-6777 LOT SUMMARY �o .. TO BE RELO .. 10p �QI ♦ 14$ \ \ ♦ •. 6 PROPOSED SIGNAL l MoOlFica TION AT / PPROPosED R Rw -_ y , o o �//�'- . `�s q6\\ 1 ,, \797 A�o. wP♦s1 \ cs I i\ /\ �� 60 N� N� 6r5 \ •\ \ Y 2 5P \\ I1fDEpWONE SERVICE: TRASH: SINGLE FAMILY HOMES) SEWER SERVICE: TRUNK LINES Lot No. Land Use LdB ACtBB 24DIAMOND BAR BLVD. WASTE MANAGEMENT INC. LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT &BREA CANYON RD. 1400 PHILLIPS RANCH RD. 13940 E. LIVE OAK AVE. 1955 WORKMAN MILL ROAD LOT1 MULTI -FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO 62 3.3 ^ L� /y �p GUM - - - - LOTS 2-5 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDOS 73 5.9 4' ROLLED CURB k GUTTER 6 CURB & GUI ,C^ ` s _--- / m m W / e p •`\ \1 pot 53 / 11 \ N y 1� A (O )NA, - 91766 (800) 266-7551 (562) 699-7411 _ Ex. R w � ° � \\ BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 WHITTIER, CA 90507 ED 47 NTS NTS � _ \+� \\ '�t" o 2 . \ 0 1 g \\ 800 483-5000 - _" -EX CCURB _ .3' rt 121\\ „ 8 FK \ ` ` 5 \ \ P �• LOTS 6-52 SINGLE FAMILY DETACH 5 7 --- /` ,150 - \ I \ \ 118• `' 1'R' :.. p,1 3 " ELECTRIC SERVICE: (EOR REFERENCE ONLY) (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) EX. POWER POLE '� - - / --- " P \` s \y c�R� ' �' ^' �\ Ps 0 \' 1 ae 60 \ TRASH: (FOR MULTI -FAMILY) SEWER SERVICE: (MAIN LINES) LOT 53-57 SLOPES/OPEN SPACE 5.7 70 BE RELOCATED -� ^- "'-- - i `\ `\ 1\ ?\� P q % �-( 154 °>\ o\ \ o, ♦ 5 ps1 9• / -\ \ SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. VALLEY VISTA INC. LOS ANGELES COUNTY OF PUBLIC WORKS - --� -' rR \ • q � % RE��. � ps1 w se I � 5'<y'L 800 CIENEGA AVE, 13940E LIVE OAK AVE. SEWER MAINTENANCE DISTRICT LOT 58 PRIVATE STREETS 4.0 SAN DIMAS, CA V91773 1 BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 900 FREEMONT LOT // o $0 683 BE _^ ip' Z° \ �'ro P (800) 655-4555 00) 266-7551 ALHAMB A - 1 3�8 RIGHY-OF-WAVY 680 \- ps V1 �' �\ ". 1b0 ri LOT 62 6 RAIN AGARDEN PARK/BASIN 1 0�� / (8 RA C 01 p 4 1 �FMP-4o oRM DRAIN , \\ \ ps1 11 V-6 0 31 1 a o 1 0%` Rar r GAS SERVICE: 3' BE DEDICATED r THE / I 6 V - _�! 1 CABLE N: p p / µ1EDTA FILTER LOW FLOW , _ P 11 w. 1 w 11 ' \ 1 3 _ ✓ / 3' BROW IiY OF DI MOND BAR a / NREATMEN B P � 2/ SISION 10 s1�1 ' �<`'' Ps ` , " • ` 6� 1 Psj6 o m L r' ON H. TYP SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. TIME WARNER LOT 63 PARK 0.9 GARAGE __, - � P \� �- - \ � � I I `A`•- _ / 1919 S. STATE COLLEGE BLVD. 0, DOOR / r _ \ CTURE m .. 6 \ I o \ c / rr ryq, rr 1041 E ROUTE 66 RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATED TO 0.5 / \ \ \ - pyc� \ l X106 a - s is (800) 427-220006 �I 1 \v 1 S �c r� GLENDORA, CA 91740 TOTAL THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 182 29.9 �. 2% MIN 25 �-'----- :. ;t bc ,. _. \ l \. ,_. Q � 4 • s1 3 r� r' i�� s oti+ I \\ p rr BENCH MARK - a /. 4' 1'L 1140± _ P' •F'a, I f _ I 1 rr � '<�%`• / ' oA $ - - o <t ; � ; � '. 1 "' ` ps1 Ps ` m qc -' . I I I .5 /,? ,,,,0 2 I. r. LOS ANGELES COUNTY BENCHMARK NO. G 5073 ELEVATION: 726.809 DATUM: NAVD 88, Ex. CAL BUILDINGS 2005 ADJUSTMENT / 135 _ I I o \ ' ` 1 - i 3' TOE ) P/ SCALE. 1 "=50, D EX R W /i r • - ,. r, 740 - I / 00/ �. / ✓ ! ^ 'La r DESCRIPTION: EX POWER POLE / / yC�OP 0\N /,- / / . - '- / b F ..Et• � 1 � 2 s :� ps `n ' 'yo i r DITCH, TYP • TY /NGS �i` R, ' �. z9 R o 0' CURB DETAIL AND UTILITIES PR POgED CURB F �/ p _r� Q ? J y' �l LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TAG IN EAST CURB OF DIAMOND KITS TO BE RELOCATED / / -� / ;n p0 ' �� / / ,' / � " l - I � - /� %f' G \ -- / , r; ;� _ SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDO MULTI FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO BAR BLVD. 42.7 FEET EAST OF CENTERLINE AND 95 FEET NORTH OF CENTERLINE OF PROPOSED R/W / 10 sl .: ' g0E`'� i g •O ° r (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) / / /. / h /. , > P _ _--. /.., Ps o. \ b r ,% 110.2 - 111.0 CROOKED CREEK DRIVE. / �. / _ > 12 ? PEDESTRIAN l l / � / ^ Of o1 / 0 � � ° a � , m''z 1 1 ,38 (SSWALK / ep � / / � ' r 29. g5, \ -. � � Xr 107.7 41.5' 28.0' 41.5' CURB n / �p / "� / �A' / W >22 , s / \ O / A' i _;G'. X10 �'' A� �l`\\* q', 1 N'k r.r / - , \ cuRo LEGAL DESCRIPTION ( / A 10.0' W 26' r' ' \ - /5, >o - 9' 6 AQV_. r -c _ , ' r/ v r, 32' BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 9 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO / / / ,r e a :! 2 CP 5 / / r '' - �'ss,1b'51. // , / / 90 ` , Try'v� � rrr MIN. MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, GOUTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Ypr� o\S,gA•r ^.� 5- A1�' ',%'rY�• r % ,,:.1psI/ r-> B � �/4 �/ gp,0A7b =,� vv v vL.. .�P3', , 4' r / r' .r 5.5' 317" o w I 5.5 94.5' 2 D 7 DEVELOPMENT S TANDARDS L 38.8' BROW ARK PER SITE D SPECIFIC PLAN 5 / - e 14 7.5' 75' GFRE TRUCK s / 5.5' 4 134.5' DEVELOPMENT STANDARD/LOWMEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL REQUIRED PROVIDEDTURNING RADIUS DETAIL 4 XISTING NDERGROUND 10.0' MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS 200 182 Al MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE 60% 41.9% TYPICAL �- z°• 0 , . I ro 5.5' - \I - - /> 1 , ',_-- - MINIMUM YARD SETBACKS: FRONT YARD 10 FEET 10 FEET tAr REAR YARD 15 FEET 88 FEET*OFF-STREET PARK/NG QNTS p ,v ' 0/ 75. SIDE YARD INTERIOR 10 FEET ONE 10 FEET * SIDE 5 OTHER CURB 12,2' SIDE YARD STREET 10 FEET STREET 10 FEET 5 / SIDE 5 ON OTHER 5 FEET wNEEL9'- SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED (60X70) r LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS 15% 6. 3' To STOP \� // ^^m°/ \ g0 / /' ,' ,3 00' ` / �� r OITCw TYP PRIVATE LANDSCAPED AREAS 15% OS r i 1.. - 16° r'' / s. Tr'7r1Cr l2 )r/-Jrr- / // /(w /�', VQ0�- `70 �•' ;`/ j � /� , SS II I II II1 ?.ts�. m -% �^o\ I _ � �_ �„ o /41 /_ ry ^^ti. • `r \O. ^` or r 3r \ P16 010- X8680. 0�' 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK � COMMON LANDSCAPED AREAS 4'4% 18.8' TOTAL LANDSCAPED AREAS 59% .os >r.r A10 jr160 PARKING SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED ExsnNc RESIDENT PARKING 94 2 ENCLOSED 94 ESM7 5.0' -4 I 0'5.0' 700 SPACES PER UNT) 5.0GUEST PARKING 32 (1 SPACE PER 3 185 5.REQUIRED RESIDENT SPACES) ROW PARKING SINGLE FAMILY TYPICAL STREET SECT/ONS , RE 11. 2' 19.Q' CONDO/MULTI-FAMILY. DITCH, TYR 70.0' 19.8' RESIDENT PARKING 270 1 ENCLOSED SPACE PER 270 r SERVICE RO/D AND A _> 9 - O rr r� CT No, 2{JF�{� PEDESTRIA)V ACCESS ONLY - 1 BEDROOM UNIT, 2 ENCLOSED ' l EMERGENCY INGRE55/CGRE55 _ SPACES PER UNITS WITH 2 w ggqq OR MORE BEDROOMS) � <; / � � � j � � 'rl TCH, TYP Fe 0`)" E �`L /U/ GUEST PARKING 90 (1 SPACE PER 3 "11 19 3' TOE DITCH, TYP �� \-@" `� r s REQUIRED RESIDENT SPACES) y . w ` 'k �. A �� b� til` fz' EASEM Nr AJ --- -. - I \ 1. ? / 8' EASEMENT 2' 15.0' 2' TOTAL PARKING TVP/CAL ON STREET \ I \ / y iq, 1q•p• p• OS' EASEMENT D.5• 2' 12. e' 2' RESIDENT PARKING. 364 364 PARALLEL PARK/NG / ^a-. m` / os' os' 0.5 _ 0.5' NTS. GUEST PARKING. 122 296 � 3d' LANDSCAPE SETBACK v Pv �� / EMERGENCY 90 \ \ I ' ,`' 2'1 OP 7/ ,2 111 2 1 2111 CURB INGRESS/EGRESS ` \ / i6o % / / \ pK z, 4,pi z, » DEVIATION TO SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SETBACKS REQUIRED 1�1 fd' / \ Z` 0 �4.Y SWALE SWALE Z.1 1 'Na"Y E ¢ NORTHERLY CL SOUTHERLY \ `s' �y \\ AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM) R/w BERM ° R/W R/W R/W R/W 46' R/W R RIGHT-OF-WAY TO SECTION A -A ENTRY - PORTION OF "A" STREET (PRIVATE) SECTION B -B ENTRY - PORTION OF "A" STREET (PRIVATE) 50' 50' 8' 42' 4' 35' 8' i M DI IN I 3• 2,07 2.0% 6' CURB & GUTTER CURB 6" CURB & GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK SECTION L -L EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) WALL 54R/W 54' I BTDEDICATEDPFND BAR _ ' �� ,'- / SECTION 1-1 SECTION J -J SECTION K -K 23.0' 23.0' _ 27'0' 27'0' 27'0' 27'01 I/ o. k EMERGENCY ACCESS ROAD SERVICE ACCESS ROAD PEDESTRIAWSERWaACGESS ROAD 36'LOT 55 I 14.0' 26' 14.0' I ---�-- I / ' S' _ (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) IfA' 1A' S'I A. /r\\ '4- 10 IS 1 IS I IU 4 2' - 8' -- Br - 2' ♦- ,.", i /. PKWY PKWY Y 22 .,y 2� l��RKI p0 "55 SIDEWALK SIDEW QP v\ a• 32'31.75'SIDEWALK SIDEWALK 5 , I, J w wCURB & CURB & CURB �� ¢ GUTTER GUTTER t1 TETE" FL u FL FL cQi FL GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER 4' 28' 4' 3' 28' 19' 2.875' 26' 2.875' SECTION C -C SECTION D -D NOR STREET LOCA( STREET MIN. TRAVEL MIN. MIN. TRAVEL PARKING MIN. TRAVEL MIN. 'A' STREET - LOCAL STREET 'A' STREET • LOCAL STREET (TAPER) PARKING BOTH SIDES \, �$ ~D$ \ 1 PARKING BOTH SIDES NO PARKING (PRIVATE) 4" RourD D" cuee d" ROLLED 4" ROLLED 0' CURB CURB CURB 6"CURB CURB (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) r. ..� \ SECTION F -F SECTION G -G SECTION H -H 4 r � PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS R/W R/w 2' 11 I 50'54' I 42' 8' 4' 42' I 8.1 1 S MI I 1 2 ~ I oz z1 I cu K e R 6" CURB & GI/TIER' 8' SIDEWALK \-6" CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED 8" SIDEWALK -8" FOE ALK SECTION L -L PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) 50' 150' 35' 4' 45' M DIA I Mon m- 3 CURB -6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER - SECTION )I EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD (PUBLIC) r�PROPOSED w R/W RWROl4Yfd7S RW iib' I 5o' 60, 8' 1 1 8' 35' 4' 63 �1 3' M DIA, 1 _ _ MP% 201 2.0% 2'1 nmm CUR6 L PROPOSED 6" CURB & GUTTER RETAINING WALL 6 CURB & CUTTER 8' SIDEWALK 5' SIDEWALK SECTION M -M PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) 14" 35' MEgIAN 1/ 6" CDR:; URB fi CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 3' SIDEWALK SECTION N -N EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) PROPOSED RIPROYFIIENIS If►1 r�PROPOSED MPROWWMT9 R�106' R/W 50' 1 11 56' 156' 1 f 8' 42' 4' 1 41' 1 B'l 3' I MDII 3• LN I I Z.1 an1 2. 09, I I PROPOS! CURB L RETAININ 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER B' SIDEWALK PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK SECTION N -N PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD (PUBLIC) PRIVATE STREET PRNATF STREET TYPICAL PRIVATE DRIVE (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) AND FIRE LANE (PRIVATE) F � PROPOSED IMPROVEMEMS PEW 8 •. R/W T y 92' RI✓ 40' 40' 40' 1 52' 8' 32' 32' 8' 1 1 1 20% 201 20% mwww _ m_ WALL L 6" CURB & GDM°R 6' CURB & GU FR 6- CURB & GUTTER i 8 SIDEWALK '-EXISNNG'8" SIDEWALK 6" CURB &GUTTER SECTION 0-0 SECTION 0-0 EXISTING BREA CANYON ROAD PROPOSED BREA GANYON ROAD (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) DENSITY SUMMARY NUMBER OF UNITS MULTI -FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO NUMBER AREA OF UNITS DENSITY OF UNITS (ACRES) 57 (DUTACRO 62 3.3 1&8 DENSITY SUMMARY NUMBER OF UNITS SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED (60x70) NUMBER AREA DENSITY OF UNITS (ACRES) (DUiACRO 47 57 82 DENSITY SUMMARY NUMBER OF UNITS SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDO NUMBER AREA GUEST (V3 PER UNIT) DENSITY OF UNITS (ACRES) TOTALS 47 (DU/ACRE) 73 5.9 185 124 PARKING SUMMARY - SINGLE FAMILY NUMBER OF UNITS REQUIRED PROVIDED COVERED (2 PER UNFD GUEST (V3 PER UNIT) COVERED (2 PER UNIT) GUEST' TOTALS 47 94 32 94 185 INCLUDES ON -STREET PARKING AND 2 GUEST SPACES IN DRIVEWAY PARKING SUMMARY - MULTI -FAMILY NUMBER OF UNITS REQUIRED PROVIDED COVERED (2 PER UI GUEST (1/3 PER UNIT) COVERED (Z PER UNIT) GUEST TOTALS 135 270 90 270 105 MAP DATE IDENTIFIER MIC OF APAT CWNCE i THIS IMV 07/30/13 BY: LP Ms or T"s 01 09 19 Z 13 7.2213 FIRE AND PLANNING LP DATE REVISION BY DATE Jufy 22, 2013 FEET W.O. 0 30 60 120 GROSS AREA 29.7 AC. t 0 1/2 1 2 CONTOUR INTERVAL 5' INCHES TOTAL LOTS 63 PREPARED FOR. PREPARED BY - 0 1111111111 Y--0WNER T T LEN NAIR0 'X -A Im 25 ENTERPRISE \ ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656 v11r \i (949) 349-8100 Z Q HUNSAKER 6r. ASSOCIATES a I R V I N E I N C 1 I- ENONE RING - SURVEYING !n Three Hughs IMA CA WfiV FX (999) 5810]59 PH: (949) aflY1I11R SITE PLAN I VEST/NG TENTATIVE TRACT 72295 F:\0718\Planning\CA_Project\SITE PLAN\0718P_SITE PLAN. dwg PROJECT PROF/LES (VERTICAL & HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1"=60') LEGEND VIEW PROFILE #1 VIEW PROFILE #4 PROJECT BOUNDARY LINE NATURAL GROUND DESIGN GROUND 2 PROPOSED GRADING 800- 760- 720- 680- "I 00760720880 840 NUMBER OF UNITS s00 800- -760 760 NING WALL 720 Lot No. 800 - CENTERLINE 7,867 UW PROPOSED WATER 5,127 s PROPOSED SEWER 760 0.122 31 6,674 SD PROPOSED STORM DRAIN 4,945 s' RTR RETAINING WALL/ 720 ' 0.145 9 4,928 0.113 In H �¢ 0.123 10 5,140 0.118 34 4,408 PROPOSED 11 4,857 Pad=7 RETOA 4,235 0.097 .V'Q P OPOT 36 PRO OSED 13 7,033 0.161 37 4,230 0.097 14 PR POSED Hep 4,232 IO PROPOSEDPZOPOSED MSE ALL t 29 30 0.102 ISEWAL LT ZlPa=766.0± 40 4,652 XISTI°L k ml 2 10 EXIS ING G ad=757. PROPOSED ± i1" ST. Pad- 60.0± Pad=76 .0± L a = T P SADO PROPO ED CRA DE 5,022 1 PR POSED SE WA L 49 Lot 4 45 5,297 0.122 clLot d=721 ± 46 5,683 '756 - 5,419 0.124 47 4,169 9 24 7,196 0.165 OI �'p1 4,808 I� 25 4,577 0.105 OPOSE 5,911 0.135 26 5,214 0.12 50 5,466 0.125 27 5,631 0.129 51 4,645 Lots 16.18 6,414 0.147 52 5,160 0.118 29 4,763 Lot 10 10 �` ---- "B" ST. --- ---- ---- -- PR POSED MSE W LL 5. DI OND BAR - - - -' P Pa =727.5 PROP A' SED S Lot 2, -- F -d=72S± Pa --- Pad 708.2± PROPOSE Pad=7715± =707.4 ad=774. -- - ---- - -- ---- - Lot ( Lot 14 O 'N' BL---- BLVD. PROP SED RETAINING WALL "A" S L 1112 t1 P Lot 7 RETAIN NG WA PR L POSED GRADE m m . ----' EXI TING G ADE R S PR SED PR SED , -' mi0i �O I PRO OSED ACCESS AC ESS ACC S Lot CL m ROPOS D MSE ALL ---- ----------- - --------- _ ---- ---- ---- ---- -------- ---- E STING a ARK I XISTING ---- ------ d=7083 Lot 1 Pad- 08"6± Pad=7 .8± Pad= 07.4± REA N RD. I REA CY . liiJ HANNE RAIN RDEN P ISTING GROUN Z - i PARK BASIN L t 1 Lot Loi 1 p -- --- E 840 NUMBER OF UNITS s00 800- -760 760 NING WALL 720 840 NUMBER OF UNITS LOT LINE OSED - - - - EASEMENT LINE NING WALL Acres Lot No. 800 - CENTERLINE 7,867 UW PROPOSED WATER 5,127 s PROPOSED SEWER 760 0.122 31 6,674 SD PROPOSED STORM DRAIN 4,945 s' RTR RETAINING WALL/ 720 ' 0.145 9 4,928 0.113 In H �¢ 0.123 10 5,140 0.118 34 4,408 PROPOSED 11 4,857 Pad=7 RETOA 4,235 0.097 .V'Q P OPOT 36 PRO OSED 13 7,033 0.161 37 4,230 0.097 14 PR POSED Hep 4,232 IO PROPOSEDPZOPOSED MSE ALL t 29 30 0.102 ISEWAL LT ZlPa=766.0± 40 4,652 XISTI°L k ml 2 10 EXIS ING G ad=757. PROPOSED ± i1" ST. Pad- 60.0± Pad=76 .0± L a = T P SADO R. -- ---- 5,022 1 Lot 17 5,347 0.123 Lot 49 Lot 4 45 5,297 0.122 clLot d=721 ± 46 5,683 Pa '756 - 5,419 0.124 47 4,169 9 840 NUMBER OF UNITS LOT LINE OSED - - - - EASEMENT LINE NING WALL Acres Lot No. 800 - CENTERLINE 7,867 UW PROPOSED WATER 5,127 s PROPOSED SEWER 760 0.122 31 6,674 SD PROPOSED STORM DRAIN 4,945 s' RTR RETAINING WALL/ 720 ' 0.145 9 720 RETAINING WALL HEIGHT 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 z TOP OF SLOPE V -DITCH 680 v �. �i�'i " MSE WALL \ 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 660 640 680 720 760 800 840 880 920 960 1000 1040 1080 1 120 1160 1200 1240 1280 1320 1360 1400 1440 1480 1520 1560 1600 / / VIEW PROFILE #2 O SIDEWALK \\ 3 \ PROPOSED 6' / ENHANCED PAVEMENT VICINITY MAP 80 - NATURAL GROUND PROPOSED GRADING 800 \ \ EX. POWER POLE \\ \ \, \ F TO BE RELOCATED NOTES 760- 720- 680 s720680 AREA TO BE DEDICATED TO �^ A Cut THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 1_ 8714-002-903 AND NUM8714-015-001.714 002-9 714-002-9 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 8714-002-900,8 O1 8 02, 760 ✓ / \ \ \ \ \\ / \ \ - - CUT/FILL LINE \\� Ex R/W &�' "'^ / 3. 5H TIP 1-1 FIII 2. EXISTING & PROPOSED ZONING: SITE D SPECIFIC PLAN 1EX CURB \ ,\ 3 PROPOSED CURB ^ ^ N 2'arNL 6 3. EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT 720 \\ - \ \ - ''\ o PROPOSED R/W ^ , FIRE HYDRANT \ \VEXISMNG 8" SEWER �\ +'" ' : �• �. 4. PROPOSED LAND USE. RESIDENTIAL \\ % EX SIGNAG TO BE s c' 6rIt2 I \ - TO BE RELOCATED n a \\ 5. EXISTING & PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN: SPECIFIC PLAN, SITE D. SEWER DRAIN LOW PLOW 680 ^w / " ie' 1�'E5 ` \ DIVERSION STRUCTURE 0 40 80 720 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680 720 760 8O0 840 880 92a 960 1000 1040 1080 1120 T- PCG i\` / 6. ALL STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND GRADING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE EX. 10" ACP WATER / aIV' .Z 26 Y WITH DIAMOND BAR STANDARDS, ORDINANCES AND APPROVED MODIFICATIONS HERETO. VIEW PROFILE #3 n s CONNECT I ON / i, r 930 135 Za / gE5M5 m TFr1CT 1VD. 3.2-074MP-40 MEDIA FILTER i EXISTING 8" SEWER / pR � .1 A0' 9 N 7. ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD SHALL BE ACCOMMODATED ON THE FINAL DESIGN, OR _ Q 25' arwL ` p -\ d big, 87�,. POYS 5J TU' 5 TREATMENT BMP THEY SHALL BE EITHER QUITCLAIMED, ABANDONED OR RELOCATED TO THE - NATURAL GROUND PROPOSED GRADING A 'W/NO 8 °' / \p \ a4o ?A ` PROPOSED MEDIAN 1a. O /V i ^ ^ 1$L' \ t` o SATISFACTION OF ALL INTERESTED PARTIES DRAINAGE AND PUBLIC UTILITY BOO 760 720 680 NUMBER OF UNITS Summary of Areas CONDO NUMBER AREA Lot No. S.F Acres Lot No. S.F Acres 6 7,867 0.181 30 5,127 0.118 7 5,295 0.122 31 6,674 0.153 8 4,945 0.114 32 6,329 0.145 9 4,928 0.113 In 5,346 0.123 10 5,140 0.118 34 4,408 PROPOSED 11 4,857 Pad=7 6.0'CK 4,235 0.097 12 P OPOT 36 4,227 0.097 13 7,033 0.161 37 4,230 0.097 14 PR POSED Hep 4,232 0.097 PROPOSEDPZOPOSED A' ST. 0.107 t 29 30 0.102 ISEWAL 4,328 0.099 40 4,652 0.107 17 2 0.107 EXIS ING G DE 18 7,473 0.172 42 _----_- 0.113 a = - 0.14 43 5,159 -- ---- 5,022 1 44 5,347 0.123 21 5,214 0.12 45 5,297 0.122 clLot 5,731 0.132 46 5,683 Pa '756 - 5,419 0.124 47 4,169 9 24 7,196 0.165 OI �'p1 4,808 I� 25 4,577 0.105 OPOSE 5,911 0.135 26 5,214 0.12 50 5,466 0.125 27 5,631 0.129 51 4,645 Lots 16.18 6,414 0.147 52 5,160 0.118 29 4,763 Lot 10 10 �` ---- "B" ST. --- ---- ---- -- PRO OSED ADE 5. DI OND BAR - - - -' P Pa =727.5 XISTIN ��' -------------------------------- -d=72S± Pa --- Pad 708.2± P =707.4 ---------------- -- - ---- - -- ---- - BL---- BLVD. PROP SED RETAINING WALL L 1112 t1 P Lot 7 RETAIN NG WA PR L POSED GRADE m m ----' EXI TING G ADE AREA TO BE DEDICATED TO �^ A Cut THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 1_ 8714-002-903 AND NUM8714-015-001.714 002-9 714-002-9 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 8714-002-900,8 O1 8 02, 760 ✓ / \ \ \ \ \\ / \ \ - - CUT/FILL LINE \\� Ex R/W &�' "'^ / 3. 5H TIP 1-1 FIII 2. EXISTING & PROPOSED ZONING: SITE D SPECIFIC PLAN 1EX CURB \ ,\ 3 PROPOSED CURB ^ ^ N 2'arNL 6 3. EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT 720 \\ - \ \ - ''\ o PROPOSED R/W ^ , FIRE HYDRANT \ \VEXISMNG 8" SEWER �\ +'" ' : �• �. 4. PROPOSED LAND USE. RESIDENTIAL \\ % EX SIGNAG TO BE s c' 6rIt2 I \ - TO BE RELOCATED n a \\ 5. EXISTING & PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN: SPECIFIC PLAN, SITE D. SEWER DRAIN LOW PLOW 680 ^w / " ie' 1�'E5 ` \ DIVERSION STRUCTURE 0 40 80 720 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680 720 760 8O0 840 880 92a 960 1000 1040 1080 1120 T- PCG i\` / 6. ALL STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND GRADING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE EX. 10" ACP WATER / aIV' .Z 26 Y WITH DIAMOND BAR STANDARDS, ORDINANCES AND APPROVED MODIFICATIONS HERETO. VIEW PROFILE #3 n s CONNECT I ON / i, r 930 135 Za / gE5M5 m TFr1CT 1VD. 3.2-074MP-40 MEDIA FILTER i EXISTING 8" SEWER / pR � .1 A0' 9 N 7. ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD SHALL BE ACCOMMODATED ON THE FINAL DESIGN, OR _ Q 25' arwL ` p -\ d big, 87�,. POYS 5J TU' 5 TREATMENT BMP THEY SHALL BE EITHER QUITCLAIMED, ABANDONED OR RELOCATED TO THE - NATURAL GROUND PROPOSED GRADING A 'W/NO 8 °' / \p \ a4o ?A ` PROPOSED MEDIAN 1a. O /V i ^ ^ 1$L' \ t` o SATISFACTION OF ALL INTERESTED PARTIES DRAINAGE AND PUBLIC UTILITY BOO 760 720 680 840 oy EASEMENTS NECESSARY TO SERVE THIS PROJECT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE EX SIGNAGE TO BE'Poo \ \` S CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AND WITH THE UTILITY PURVEYORS. EXISTING STORM DRAIN „w /L :136.5 pe° E \` d - \ \ �_\ -� UTILITY AGENCIES EASEMENTS WILL BE ABANDONED DURING THE FINAL MAP PROCEDURES. F \, TO BE RELOCATED aoo 7'r��1Cl' l\/O, r33 .A 17 1 \ o "� 2.yh t,z� e \o gj398 �\ -- -- ---- j p M \\ p 8. MULTI FAMILY BUILDING TO MEET NFPA 13 STANDARDS. - - �G � �� 1 •>'� 0 \\ e'� WATER: TRASH: (SINGLE FAMILY (SINGLE FAMILY HOMES PROPOSED SIGNAL T / & / 136 - o i� WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WASTE MANAGEMENT INC. 9. ESTIMATED EARTHWORK QUANTITIES: 415,500 CYS. CUT, 415,500 CYS. FILL. 760 \ CONNECT TO EXISMNc •w/ ^ 2 ` 271 S. BREA CANYON ROAD BALDW E. LIVE OAK AVE, 10' ACP WA7ER / \ 5 y 'o o \2 R o - - 136' q q 5 w WALNUT, CA 554 BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 10. SEWER SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION �e �� ppLL (909) 595-7554 (800) 266-7551 DISTRICT. TELEPHONE SERVICE: TRASH: (FOR MULTI -FAMILY) 11. PER LA COUNTY FIRM PANEL 1880 OF 2350. 720 \ .'W \ �p2 �!� / \ 115• 1 ° --- VERIZON VALLEY VISTA INC. p' 1400 PHILLIPS RANCH RD. 13940 E. LIVE OAK AVE 12. PRIVATE WATER QUALITY BMP'S TO BE MAINTAINED BY H.O.A. / 30' LASE eA�lEc� \ \ 61/ Po172ss -Iz`i \ \ p•12g8 \ N ,�\� 95 2 Ps1 t\ wPtEµ I POMONA, CA 91766 BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 sa0 \2'� \ a ,5 & 0\IE\� " \�,� \ \ ps1.GE55 iG ESM\ (800) 483-SOOD (800 266-7551 13. LOTS 62 & 63 ARE TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR &MAINTAINED BY THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. �0 w No - �+. • 81 h \ pot5g0 ESM E55 '+ x11$6\ 5 x7360 q6 81,q 051 ELECTRIC SERVICE: CABLE N: 14. ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG DIAMOND BAR BLVD, BREA CANYON RD AND 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 180 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 800 640 880 710 760 a00 840 880 920 / ` w 6 6�\ , \ PGG P r. 2 e \ \ E \ - /EX SIGNAGE TO BE 0 p000 h. 26. �ptl , h ,FREE C \ \ w \ \yPi� SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDSON CO. TIME WARNER PASADO DR. TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. / TO BE RELOCATED , .m \40H a 6`a 0 r gx1'11'0 J iN WB 5 - �. cK'P"o1 55 \ \ �% ?,170 ` --'o iG MSE !_LI. 1, - 800 CIENEGA AVE. 1041 E. ROUTE 66 TRr1CT l�lo �5DD] A \/ BE DE ICAWAY 70 E 5-4555 73 GLENDO A 91740 5 ALL RASH O INDIVIDUAL PCO BE O WASTE MANAGEMENT. STREET. RASH PICK UP FOR C/ -.- o' BE DEDICATED TO THE o z3-" /- "�\'9, P - °' �` g6' PO\E\CI \ ` \ 5 R C LOTST2 THROUGH 5NEEDS I70 BE LOCATED ON "B" STREET. TRASH PICK UP FOR CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 60% �, Po11 0 \ g SMS. w \ Po140 .1405 \ \ (800) 6SAN AS, CA 917 POSTAL SERVICE: LOT 1 WILL BE ALONG THE LOOP ALLEY. 0^� �`' �P ) , .1568`-� \ E -\ GAS SERVICE: USPS / �/ EX. 72 ACP WATER - -r 95 ",� P o ¢ 0 O `\ p•1365 `\� 5 1 P \ \�' ROVI P SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. 1317 SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BLVD, 16. LOTS 1-5 TO BE MAPPED FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES. i w w a' RrwL �s. 5x o6 ,- 11' x146' _ 3' B TI s r -SEX EALLe TO BE i x \ a P� 55 v P _ h 1 9cR' 1919 IS.M STATE COLLEGE BLVD. DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 ! / /fO�eE ALL _ / � � t�Z `'o �� \ 25' �� 0`N 0 \ \ o�� 2fi PG\Et5'I o \\ 01.5 Po198 `\`\ r' �1 � ° (800) 275-8777 17_ STORM DRAIN SYSTEM TO BE PRIVATE. PROPOSED MEDIA � -.' r- / r79' -� � s j6, A - g 5M5. P rs• A A � 11 V (800) 427-2200 06 EX POWER POLE/ v14� oj531 �� p�1 E 5 ^'se v - TION DISTRICT 18• EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED PER TREE SURVEY. \ �� p 0 4, a' �� \ 2' 318 2a "'4u \� `\\ SEWER SERVICE: (TR NK _ TO BE RELoca rED ` Mo o �� foo N�,Q1 `1,Ze .15yz\ 0 \ \ \ \ ey1 _-- \5 SCHOOL DISTRICT., LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION LI PROPOSED SIGNAL - - - a a P / & \ \ 960. _ ( \\ 1955 WORKMAN MILL ROAD. MODIFICATION AT PROPOSED R w, / \\ ,1132 Pot N ` 115 g, WALNUT VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT qC DIAMOND BAR BLVD 10"---- PROPOSED C E r \2.w e e \\ \ R \� \\ p� 5 .1168 `\ "' - LOT SUMMARY 5 HITTIER, CA 90607 6" 1.6" &BREA CANYON R0. �- 1 �' M13 \\ p' 2 � �' / 62 \ GF PER PLAN 6" 12" 12" -- �' � \\ 880 SOUTH LEMON AVEAVE. PROPOSEDSEo sI� i�- - O1126 \\ .. 9t2� ,� " e 6 \ \ 1 WALNUT, CA 91789 (562) 699-7411 Iw -- o •w� - ee p' \\ '( 55 1533 o d - \ \ , x156 \ \ \ 1 ,2 3 - Pa 8. pn1635 \\ SEWER SERVICE: MAIN LINES) /�' , 6 \\ O cE \ - \ o x \ o 'boa 16 �.� ( Lot No. Land Use Units Ades "" TO 12"W� 3 s v EX R/W.'- t \ 51 \\`6' PG \Ur 1P' -./ 8 O " P\ -. -Ex cuae °' � '" 82 ` J' �I4' `A � F � ` \ e."� X09 A � � LOS ANGELES COUNTY OF PUBLIC WORKS , 465 ` \ \ = 1iz , 615 i4 \\ SEWER MAINTENANCE DISTRICT LOT 1 MULTI -FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO 62 3.3 ..11 tN" o 1 �- '- / I R-� -• EX POWER POLEW_ ->.- - o, �-- �,.> -� i PG \d \\ ,1t1. /ctR� b �\ Po \ aR y0 6 \ - -12"IAS= t2"W - ^, - �- � \ \26' p50. P. � G 4 0{ 5 \o sj198 1 _ l P' \ 900 FREEMONT 70 BE RELOCATED -� 'v_ - _ i \ \ g M5. t 2 " 4' 55 \ �" 5 p / Z i 6/ �/• . R� e ;.:.6 � R=1/2" y -- Y - _ - r � _ _ _ 3.�`�.7p9u \ Es 1 � 1 \\ Q,, RE�; /' p.1 MSF I � \ ''\36' \ �\ 1t 2• y�Fu � 610 ; o. � � 1ALHAMBRA, CA LOTS 2-5 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDOS 73 5.9 - _ \-- 2't/'bd 9.1 o r Yl LOTS 6-52 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED 47 5.7 6 53-57 E - ..per r� j5A9 2• „ \\. \ \� o 0 16' �(� x - ` - O r 680 LOT SLOPES/OPEN SPACE 5.7 RIGHT-OF-WAY TD > ti6' �5 MSF R 6o R32 EX/ST/NG EASEMENTS :• , ... , 6 MP -40 TORW DRAIN \ \ Po ctR` 6 CI DE F E1,A ONb THE - / _ '' p r MEDIA FILTER 8 LOW FLOW 9 -� }8 0153 $ \ g 5M5' � 157 ( ( I A 1 / �- 4 6 TO 660 � 37 Y o� / 3' BROW R- 1, ' � � ,,.: � p � v E w �� p.1 Ms' �t ; 1 I °�. 9 ' ye p.l o r �� DITai, LOT 58 PRIVATE STREETS 4.0 V i./CITY OF DIx MONO BAR - V� DIVERSION 'o G 509 s1�1 6 _ �TYP �EATMENT B P � a'. :' .� '� CTDRE 26' K t,, P - o -� + 5 °' m 1>Z8 V\ \ 551 '1 y FWo(� 0 \\6 4qi( 665 o. i8 6 -- / „ 2 EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 74,EDISON PA COMPANY FOR PUBLIC UMLTMES LOT 59-61 PRIVATE DRIVEWAYS 0.1 6' CURB � GUTTER , / - - � - & y� � 1' E �g 0 25 � G' � Po � p.1 !Ry! I : o � � \Ps1 S �- m / �✓, x REC FEBRUARY 8, 7954 IN BOOK 43774, PAGE 74L O.R. a' ROLLED CURB k CUTLER Fo. .1 ti/ / 3y ii a/ _ _ x LOT 62 RAIN GARDEN PARK/BASIN 3.8 7 P o / ° O NTS MS s- / r / s- `p, 4 .155'3 5' \ .1\6A 3 /' /' 5 u/M I ` ` xx� 3 EASEMENT IN GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, A CORPORA nON / ^a5' r 25' m / P 534 \ P TJ v N 1 r / 185' \ 'ly 70 / FOR POLE LINES REG APRIL 28, 1954 /N BOOK 44446, PAGE 33, O.R. LOT 63 PARK 0.9 (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) / p / ^0 \ r 3Qv / o\#'� N Ow / PGGESCI "- pal Y 160 / P' h9 atm'' \. \ 3 r / j,.5 r Y'` �, q0 15 �_ X ix `• ^ / / 'y ,32�y 108 =1 �_ 2 U Ot l s' I o O �� 16 ' \ ` ✓ O6 EASEMENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR STORM GRAIN PURPOSES AS SHOWN ON TRACT Na 27577 REC. IN RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATED TO 0.5 / s2- s ✓ 0 / `ZC 7 / / r I �� y t a? cv? y .1 g E55A5. 9 2 �• 548 \ P•756' x°.$W ! u I^ : /r g0 / i'' _ P' I^ o I 910 BK 702, PGS. 22 TO 25 INCLUSIVE OF MAPS RECORDS LOS ANGELES COUNTY. THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR a z• �O2,Po / /// / / r/.K.' ;\'- 1 p•j11' Pal ` ss s( - I I 645 / e2 1. 31 iN r Ex CUR e: cS i/ o a \ . .-. - r�\\ \ 1 16 ;'' °QQp0° ,^ o ° r a - 6 - - - Z - I I P' /' 9 a� 0 \ P' EASEMENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR WATER PIPELINES REC AUGUST 31, 1960 AS INST No. 3778, IN BK; TOTAL 182 29.9 EX. ��W / 0 4, 2 / /' / / Qr 00 ; �, f 9 $ X / 5 2 p \ l _ ^C 41 , 0 ' / y0 / S 24 ! \ i1 'o �. x' DI TOE R/ 2 r -s, > ` 56 535 a M TCH. TVP 3• EX POWER POLE O / / }`P 0r" 0�" / r r y �� /c pGGE 5t a1 P' 740 I ) ��- 1 4 0° R 0962 PAGE 305, O.R. SURVEYORS NOTE.' EASEMENT FOLLOWS THE CENTERLINE OF DIAMOND BAR BLVD., AND UTILITIES PROPOSED CURB �/ b O ^s / _ r ''6 / Q 25' pSVU j R -;y9: - / ^ G /�' Oti OJ•� �// / j NO WIDTH IS GIVEN IN THE DOCUMENT GARAGE 70 BE RELOCATED,. PROPOSED R/W / �`° �� > 50. g 5Ml ob -- q '� 55 6' `R' / y y L ,o / R^ / 7r �: 511 1 U i _PEDESTRIAN l -- 6"°'/r '/ -16 6 'i 17 EASEMENT 7 THE PUBLIC FOR STREET PURPOSES AS SHOWN ON TRACT No, 25989 REG. IN BK. 714, BENCH MAR/ o. DOOR / / Y . h / / ^ � 0 ?8• 1 .1 � 9' � � P' moo. I L, PGS: 5 70 7 OF MAPS RECORDS OF COS ANGELES COUNTY. 6 I ^� / O� "> / Of �°+ / y o y, r/rn-FS&; 'zs,''•. PGGE5E5M5 N Pot gg `�� r �; II 4� o �s1ke� �'^ 6, S2 ti' ` 'x LOS ANGELES COUNTY BENCHMARK NO. G 5073 ELEVATION: 726.809 DATUM: NAVD 88, 2% 2� % MIN / / / y� N f / �2 \ �A SMT 5 �StUN tC w\ / ;'s, r /�o . 2 1hA° �� / `�� 20 o- ,vn a5 / /i 3 EASEMENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR STORM DRAINS AND SANITARY SEWER AS SHOWN ON TRACT NO. 27577 2005 ADJUSTMENT Ny,9�'%��o• r' �,. ^ A ✓�, / A ❑ REC IN BK 702, PGS 22 TO 25 INCLUSIVE OF MAPS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY. ',' `o / / / Q °o / / I �N r C"' �° ro° �ao� `° / - pa755' sF/v4 r ✓o' / =Y/ i o F' , , 0 ri A Et . a0 7 2r' / v _ r • / 0 �C 15' xo 7g. 1� ,/; 2a ( .a / ! - / r r /< , 166. / DESCRIPTION: FOR GAS PIPE LINES, LIGHT, POWER ® EASEMENT 70 SOUTHERN COUNTIES GAS COMPANY Of CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TAG IN EAST CURB OF DIAMOND PURPOSES REC. FEBRUARY 17, 1964 REC. AS INST. 3774, O.R. BAR BLVD. 42.7 FEET EAST OF CENTERLINE AND 95 FEET NORTH OF CENTERLINE OF / / Yr / A // ( y . l h y Mr / b , -� ra 4i .,9 '), s` so, ✓ .ti /�' ,/ CROOKED CREEK DRIVE. a z D O AU m f 9x153' r r /2. o �� 5 EASEMENT TO THE DIAMOND BAR WATER COMPANY FOR WATER PIPES REQ AUGUST 31, 1960 REC IN BK. /y /o•0' 6 - ' r ! ✓ /j r o 4 ti 6s / x D-962, PAGE 305, O.R. AND REC DATE. AUGUST 10, 1964 AS INST. No, 3417 O.R. 0' CURB DETAIL 675 ---fl _ �O-e LOT` > O' �v �o /ir �� w ✓4 P szv .1655 ❑ SURVEYOR'S NOTE' / 0 i d / r >fl d r ti P EASEMENT FOLLOWS THECENTERLINE OF DIAMOND BAR BLVD., NO WIDTH IS GIVEN 12 NTS / GR �� / / R,goY N0° / �0 (.�,�� / ,1.. ^%'a a / /` 5 i ''s. i0.,. / : 0O r / IN THE DOCUMENT FOR REFERENCE ONLY % 3 ARK o �' A ti e / p .y /3' 6t / / a / / / sem, C p % r L Si /X 3' BROW / LEGAL /E / DE�+CR//�T/ON ( ) / / a P, r / 7 o' ✓ 10,' / ^�`, / P' / / . 114. x v ; ; / ^b Q a T / DITCH, nP L GAL S i�� 6 EASEMENT TO THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FOR SANITARY SEWER PURPOSES REC. NOVEMBER 11, 1971 - 3 ❑ AS INST. 3366, OR. 4 /� BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 9 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO 4 EXISTING / / V' / (� 's, ' 6 / / q Rrni /moo ✓v r 'xY /@ MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, GOUTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. UNDERGROUND l / / / A r Iti �� / Q` a 0 ">0 154 55 a �"5 x tj. / EASEMENT TO THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FOR .STORM GRAIN, INGRESS AND EGRESS REG. DATE SURFACE FLOWS G`v. / 0'b 01 •� ' P' / ,11 / s„� sy / 'x 0 7 '1 3 / r lid P'pa0 / MAY iB, 1982 AS INST. 82-508759, 0 R 9 / -z 45 � is x`<v �r � ^ 161.5 lJ> i h/ ' /� ,.�1 o r P- s- / r ,,'' G STATEMENT OF OWNERSHIP / > ^ \ � o r / � / � / `A` az / 154• \%cR ,l'' / ^° br .+�. r / / �26 ' � � � 5 �. o � � � .ti i J � / 'O � \ � ' �u2 1695 / � � < y�J ��- ^� ^OG /./ ✓ 6'S 1� l i� 1548 P' �."�'�� '4 �j5�0V SOA/ O LOT Mv9 Q• 1 \ I _ _ - - / C / �- % Po 46 b ^ > 'il x I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED UNDER MY 1, 1fro m 1 / P / ! s , 6 /+ I / / : es ^ �0 �' SA 90' c, �j� y i� 1 p 2�^ 15' ^ ti y /' SG�� SINGLE FAMILY SUPERVISION AND THAT THE OWNER OF RECORD HAS KNOWLEDGE ((�' r / r 9 15 ,�� m 9 � r 1. o R° ' �� oA° 5 `�' 0� � `✓ s m Pal ^ pa /� vp1^ / OF AND CONSENTS TO THE FILING OF THIS MAP. �. s a \ o / N / �. Pa 5 P� s, b ^ T O - - s.. \ h '1 / i✓ 3' Tnr/ V/ FlRE TRUCK VQ �P 155.0 TURNING RADIUS DETAIL 30' ANDSCAPE SETBACK ( 256 m J� x,32 / / h5 A A P' O NTS / f p s. ^ --- -8. ' / 1 "J 7r�r� �� 1v�i-% �176� � 1 � _ _ I 7py0 - . 5 5 � li u, � R � 4 �i ��i / / Rp 2 � 79.05 �; S r? ICT IID, ,3�1b(J i 55 �� I -p `V• �� /' rt ' y,A x'49. 0 �15J`8 idsV ' /`� �� ^ /o- / Zc 11 � � v �,4P``' , rg 14 � v"7w✓ ^ � yof ,�// p,l 1 / 4 'C' / TYPICAL STREET SECT/ONS 7 v M ^ M z5 �� ' pa1�o 6D;� -.0 y TRE/ f..... 65 P/1560 41p s pyo / /' GO ' l R� � Jl� L�J�J PEDESTRIfAIy ACCESS ONLY \ _ R W RAW l EMERGENCY �2:.> sT r/✓ 1b rn�_ p -'L{1 3% W - / 6s / �� NCREss/EGRESS v e° a" 156' a ^, P 5' 5' / - - f 6 0 saos � -, o ^ c510 � � ss' 15 29' P VARIES h' 11 25' 14' 26' S' 8' VARIES / .� V �' �� rr \ \ a5 p+ Pa se A ^ ME IAN' LANOSCgPE LANDSCAPE 3' TOE DITCH, TYP = t6 ti \ 5 tiPGS / 12' EASEM NT ?, I 1 Mn'T Q5� 1 v ^ 2i '., , s ^o^ 9.15 N oti / � - 2� 15 0' z' T 1• m 8' EASEMENT MqX \ I , ` O 1 2' 74. 14.0' 2' 0.5' EASEMENT o.5• 2' 12.0' 2' 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK L �� _ � 4 +\�s, `S gypsy 1$ / � i' `�� / / ` 0.5' 0.5' 0.5 �T' 0.5' 5' SIDEWALK 5' SIDEWALK t M 'I MpY' C.1 MpL 2\ Mp1' 8" CURB EMERGENCY e A A C / 1 26X 2 5 PARKWAY 5" PARKWAY v � 6 6' CURB & GIJ 6" CURB & GUTTER INGRESS/EGRESS 39 2 \ C�\ �' % % / / \ 2:A M�' I14tak SWALf SWALE Zr'M'4'1' SECTION A -A , K \\ J ¢ ¢ a so 6 5 AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM NUMBER OF UNITS Summary of Areas CONDO NUMBER AREA Lot No. S.F Acres Lot No. S.F Acres 6 7,867 0.181 30 5,127 0.118 7 5,295 0.122 31 6,674 0.153 8 4,945 0.114 32 6,329 0.145 9 4,928 0.113 33 5,346 0.123 10 5,140 0.118 34 4,408 PROPOSED 11 4,857 Pad=7 6.0'CK 4,235 0.097 12 4,761 -' 36 4,227 0.097 13 7,033 0.161 37 4,230 0.097 14 PR POSED 38 4,232 0.097 15 A' ST. 0.107 t 29 30 0.102 16 4,328 0.099 40 4,652 0.107 17 2 0.107 EXIS ING G DE 18 7,473 0.172 42 4,924 0.113 a = - 0.14 43 5,159 -- ---- 5,022 1 44 5,347 0.123 21 5,214 0.12 45 5,297 0.122 clLot 5,731 0.132 46 5,683 0.13 23 5,419 0.124 47 4,169 9 24 7,196 0.165 48 4,808 0.11 25 4,577 0.105 49 5,911 0.135 26 5,214 0.12 50 5,466 0.125 27 5,631 0.129 51 4,645 0.107 28 6,414 0.147 52 5,160 0.118 29 4,763 ISTIN ---- --- --- ---- ---- -- 5. DI OND BAR - - - -' P OPOSE Pa =727.5 -d=72S± Pa =722.02 Ot PROP SED RETAINING WALL P OPOS RETAIN NG WA PR L POSED GRADE m 840 oy EASEMENTS NECESSARY TO SERVE THIS PROJECT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE EX SIGNAGE TO BE'Poo \ \` S CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AND WITH THE UTILITY PURVEYORS. EXISTING STORM DRAIN „w /L :136.5 pe° E \` d - \ \ �_\ -� UTILITY AGENCIES EASEMENTS WILL BE ABANDONED DURING THE FINAL MAP PROCEDURES. F \, TO BE RELOCATED aoo 7'r��1Cl' l\/O, r33 .A 17 1 \ o "� 2.yh t,z� e \o gj398 �\ -- -- ---- j p M \\ p 8. MULTI FAMILY BUILDING TO MEET NFPA 13 STANDARDS. - - �G � �� 1 •>'� 0 \\ e'� WATER: TRASH: (SINGLE FAMILY (SINGLE FAMILY HOMES PROPOSED SIGNAL T / & / 136 - o i� WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WASTE MANAGEMENT INC. 9. ESTIMATED EARTHWORK QUANTITIES: 415,500 CYS. CUT, 415,500 CYS. FILL. 760 \ CONNECT TO EXISMNc •w/ ^ 2 ` 271 S. BREA CANYON ROAD BALDW E. LIVE OAK AVE, 10' ACP WA7ER / \ 5 y 'o o \2 R o - - 136' q q 5 w WALNUT, CA 554 BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 10. SEWER SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION �e �� ppLL (909) 595-7554 (800) 266-7551 DISTRICT. TELEPHONE SERVICE: TRASH: (FOR MULTI -FAMILY) 11. PER LA COUNTY FIRM PANEL 1880 OF 2350. 720 \ .'W \ �p2 �!� / \ 115• 1 ° --- VERIZON VALLEY VISTA INC. p' 1400 PHILLIPS RANCH RD. 13940 E. LIVE OAK AVE 12. PRIVATE WATER QUALITY BMP'S TO BE MAINTAINED BY H.O.A. / 30' LASE eA�lEc� \ \ 61/ Po172ss -Iz`i \ \ p•12g8 \ N ,�\� 95 2 Ps1 t\ wPtEµ I POMONA, CA 91766 BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 sa0 \2'� \ a ,5 & 0\IE\� " \�,� \ \ ps1.GE55 iG ESM\ (800) 483-SOOD (800 266-7551 13. LOTS 62 & 63 ARE TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR &MAINTAINED BY THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. �0 w No - �+. • 81 h \ pot5g0 ESM E55 '+ x11$6\ 5 x7360 q6 81,q 051 ELECTRIC SERVICE: CABLE N: 14. ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG DIAMOND BAR BLVD, BREA CANYON RD AND 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 180 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 800 640 880 710 760 a00 840 880 920 / ` w 6 6�\ , \ PGG P r. 2 e \ \ E \ - /EX SIGNAGE TO BE 0 p000 h. 26. �ptl , h ,FREE C \ \ w \ \yPi� SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDSON CO. TIME WARNER PASADO DR. TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. / TO BE RELOCATED , .m \40H a 6`a 0 r gx1'11'0 J iN WB 5 - �. cK'P"o1 55 \ \ �% ?,170 ` --'o iG MSE !_LI. 1, - 800 CIENEGA AVE. 1041 E. ROUTE 66 TRr1CT l�lo �5DD] A \/ BE DE ICAWAY 70 E 5-4555 73 GLENDO A 91740 5 ALL RASH O INDIVIDUAL PCO BE O WASTE MANAGEMENT. STREET. RASH PICK UP FOR C/ -.- o' BE DEDICATED TO THE o z3-" /- "�\'9, P - °' �` g6' PO\E\CI \ ` \ 5 R C LOTST2 THROUGH 5NEEDS I70 BE LOCATED ON "B" STREET. TRASH PICK UP FOR CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 60% �, Po11 0 \ g SMS. w \ Po140 .1405 \ \ (800) 6SAN AS, CA 917 POSTAL SERVICE: LOT 1 WILL BE ALONG THE LOOP ALLEY. 0^� �`' �P ) , .1568`-� \ E -\ GAS SERVICE: USPS / �/ EX. 72 ACP WATER - -r 95 ",� P o ¢ 0 O `\ p•1365 `\� 5 1 P \ \�' ROVI P SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. 1317 SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BLVD, 16. LOTS 1-5 TO BE MAPPED FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES. i w w a' RrwL �s. 5x o6 ,- 11' x146' _ 3' B TI s r -SEX EALLe TO BE i x \ a P� 55 v P _ h 1 9cR' 1919 IS.M STATE COLLEGE BLVD. DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 ! / /fO�eE ALL _ / � � t�Z `'o �� \ 25' �� 0`N 0 \ \ o�� 2fi PG\Et5'I o \\ 01.5 Po198 `\`\ r' �1 � ° (800) 275-8777 17_ STORM DRAIN SYSTEM TO BE PRIVATE. PROPOSED MEDIA � -.' r- / r79' -� � s j6, A - g 5M5. P rs• A A � 11 V (800) 427-2200 06 EX POWER POLE/ v14� oj531 �� p�1 E 5 ^'se v - TION DISTRICT 18• EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED PER TREE SURVEY. \ �� p 0 4, a' �� \ 2' 318 2a "'4u \� `\\ SEWER SERVICE: (TR NK _ TO BE RELoca rED ` Mo o �� foo N�,Q1 `1,Ze .15yz\ 0 \ \ \ \ ey1 _-- \5 SCHOOL DISTRICT., LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION LI PROPOSED SIGNAL - - - a a P / & \ \ 960. _ ( \\ 1955 WORKMAN MILL ROAD. MODIFICATION AT PROPOSED R w, / \\ ,1132 Pot N ` 115 g, WALNUT VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT qC DIAMOND BAR BLVD 10"---- PROPOSED C E r \2.w e e \\ \ R \� \\ p� 5 .1168 `\ "' - LOT SUMMARY 5 HITTIER, CA 90607 6" 1.6" &BREA CANYON R0. �- 1 �' M13 \\ p' 2 � �' / 62 \ GF PER PLAN 6" 12" 12" -- �' � \\ 880 SOUTH LEMON AVEAVE. PROPOSEDSEo sI� i�- - O1126 \\ .. 9t2� ,� " e 6 \ \ 1 WALNUT, CA 91789 (562) 699-7411 Iw -- o •w� - ee p' \\ '( 55 1533 o d - \ \ , x156 \ \ \ 1 ,2 3 - Pa 8. pn1635 \\ SEWER SERVICE: MAIN LINES) /�' , 6 \\ O cE \ - \ o x \ o 'boa 16 �.� ( Lot No. Land Use Units Ades "" TO 12"W� 3 s v EX R/W.'- t \ 51 \\`6' PG \Ur 1P' -./ 8 O " P\ -. -Ex cuae °' � '" 82 ` J' �I4' `A � F � ` \ e."� X09 A � � LOS ANGELES COUNTY OF PUBLIC WORKS , 465 ` \ \ = 1iz , 615 i4 \\ SEWER MAINTENANCE DISTRICT LOT 1 MULTI -FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO 62 3.3 ..11 tN" o 1 �- '- / I R-� -• EX POWER POLEW_ ->.- - o, �-- �,.> -� i PG \d \\ ,1t1. /ctR� b �\ Po \ aR y0 6 \ - -12"IAS= t2"W - ^, - �- � \ \26' p50. P. � G 4 0{ 5 \o sj198 1 _ l P' \ 900 FREEMONT 70 BE RELOCATED -� 'v_ - _ i \ \ g M5. t 2 " 4' 55 \ �" 5 p / Z i 6/ �/• . R� e ;.:.6 � R=1/2" y -- Y - _ - r � _ _ _ 3.�`�.7p9u \ Es 1 � 1 \\ Q,, RE�; /' p.1 MSF I � \ ''\36' \ �\ 1t 2• y�Fu � 610 ; o. � � 1ALHAMBRA, CA LOTS 2-5 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDOS 73 5.9 - _ \-- 2't/'bd 9.1 o r Yl LOTS 6-52 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED 47 5.7 6 53-57 E - ..per r� j5A9 2• „ \\. \ \� o 0 16' �(� x - ` - O r 680 LOT SLOPES/OPEN SPACE 5.7 RIGHT-OF-WAY TD > ti6' �5 MSF R 6o R32 EX/ST/NG EASEMENTS :• , ... , 6 MP -40 TORW DRAIN \ \ Po ctR` 6 CI DE F E1,A ONb THE - / _ '' p r MEDIA FILTER 8 LOW FLOW 9 -� }8 0153 $ \ g 5M5' � 157 ( ( I A 1 / �- 4 6 TO 660 � 37 Y o� / 3' BROW R- 1, ' � � ,,.: � p � v E w �� p.1 Ms' �t ; 1 I °�. 9 ' ye p.l o r �� DITai, LOT 58 PRIVATE STREETS 4.0 V i./CITY OF DIx MONO BAR - V� DIVERSION 'o G 509 s1�1 6 _ �TYP �EATMENT B P � a'. :' .� '� CTDRE 26' K t,, P - o -� + 5 °' m 1>Z8 V\ \ 551 '1 y FWo(� 0 \\6 4qi( 665 o. i8 6 -- / „ 2 EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 74,EDISON PA COMPANY FOR PUBLIC UMLTMES LOT 59-61 PRIVATE DRIVEWAYS 0.1 6' CURB � GUTTER , / - - � - & y� � 1' E �g 0 25 � G' � Po � p.1 !Ry! I : o � � \Ps1 S �- m / �✓, x REC FEBRUARY 8, 7954 IN BOOK 43774, PAGE 74L O.R. a' ROLLED CURB k CUTLER Fo. .1 ti/ / 3y ii a/ _ _ x LOT 62 RAIN GARDEN PARK/BASIN 3.8 7 P o / ° O NTS MS s- / r / s- `p, 4 .155'3 5' \ .1\6A 3 /' /' 5 u/M I ` ` xx� 3 EASEMENT IN GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, A CORPORA nON / ^a5' r 25' m / P 534 \ P TJ v N 1 r / 185' \ 'ly 70 / FOR POLE LINES REG APRIL 28, 1954 /N BOOK 44446, PAGE 33, O.R. LOT 63 PARK 0.9 (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) / p / ^0 \ r 3Qv / o\#'� N Ow / PGGESCI "- pal Y 160 / P' h9 atm'' \. \ 3 r / j,.5 r Y'` �, q0 15 �_ X ix `• ^ / / 'y ,32�y 108 =1 �_ 2 U Ot l s' I o O �� 16 ' \ ` ✓ O6 EASEMENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR STORM GRAIN PURPOSES AS SHOWN ON TRACT Na 27577 REC. IN RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATED TO 0.5 / s2- s ✓ 0 / `ZC 7 / / r I �� y t a? cv? y .1 g E55A5. 9 2 �• 548 \ P•756' x°.$W ! u I^ : /r g0 / i'' _ P' I^ o I 910 BK 702, PGS. 22 TO 25 INCLUSIVE OF MAPS RECORDS LOS ANGELES COUNTY. THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR a z• �O2,Po / /// / / r/.K.' ;\'- 1 p•j11' Pal ` ss s( - I I 645 / e2 1. 31 iN r Ex CUR e: cS i/ o a \ . .-. - r�\\ \ 1 16 ;'' °QQp0° ,^ o ° r a - 6 - - - Z - I I P' /' 9 a� 0 \ P' EASEMENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR WATER PIPELINES REC AUGUST 31, 1960 AS INST No. 3778, IN BK; TOTAL 182 29.9 EX. ��W / 0 4, 2 / /' / / Qr 00 ; �, f 9 $ X / 5 2 p \ l _ ^C 41 , 0 ' / y0 / S 24 ! \ i1 'o �. x' DI TOE R/ 2 r -s, > ` 56 535 a M TCH. TVP 3• EX POWER POLE O / / }`P 0r" 0�" / r r y �� /c pGGE 5t a1 P' 740 I ) ��- 1 4 0° R 0962 PAGE 305, O.R. SURVEYORS NOTE.' EASEMENT FOLLOWS THE CENTERLINE OF DIAMOND BAR BLVD., AND UTILITIES PROPOSED CURB �/ b O ^s / _ r ''6 / Q 25' pSVU j R -;y9: - / ^ G /�' Oti OJ•� �// / j NO WIDTH IS GIVEN IN THE DOCUMENT GARAGE 70 BE RELOCATED,. PROPOSED R/W / �`° �� > 50. g 5Ml ob -- q '� 55 6' `R' / y y L ,o / R^ / 7r �: 511 1 U i _PEDESTRIAN l -- 6"°'/r '/ -16 6 'i 17 EASEMENT 7 THE PUBLIC FOR STREET PURPOSES AS SHOWN ON TRACT No, 25989 REG. IN BK. 714, BENCH MAR/ o. DOOR / / Y . h / / ^ � 0 ?8• 1 .1 � 9' � � P' moo. I L, PGS: 5 70 7 OF MAPS RECORDS OF COS ANGELES COUNTY. 6 I ^� / O� "> / Of �°+ / y o y, r/rn-FS&; 'zs,''•. PGGE5E5M5 N Pot gg `�� r �; II 4� o �s1ke� �'^ 6, S2 ti' ` 'x LOS ANGELES COUNTY BENCHMARK NO. G 5073 ELEVATION: 726.809 DATUM: NAVD 88, 2% 2� % MIN / / / y� N f / �2 \ �A SMT 5 �StUN tC w\ / ;'s, r /�o . 2 1hA° �� / `�� 20 o- ,vn a5 / /i 3 EASEMENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR STORM DRAINS AND SANITARY SEWER AS SHOWN ON TRACT NO. 27577 2005 ADJUSTMENT Ny,9�'%��o• r' �,. ^ A ✓�, / A ❑ REC IN BK 702, PGS 22 TO 25 INCLUSIVE OF MAPS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY. ',' `o / / / Q °o / / I �N r C"' �° ro° �ao� `° / - pa755' sF/v4 r ✓o' / =Y/ i o F' , , 0 ri A Et . a0 7 2r' / v _ r • / 0 �C 15' xo 7g. 1� ,/; 2a ( .a / ! - / r r /< , 166. / DESCRIPTION: FOR GAS PIPE LINES, LIGHT, POWER ® EASEMENT 70 SOUTHERN COUNTIES GAS COMPANY Of CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TAG IN EAST CURB OF DIAMOND PURPOSES REC. FEBRUARY 17, 1964 REC. AS INST. 3774, O.R. BAR BLVD. 42.7 FEET EAST OF CENTERLINE AND 95 FEET NORTH OF CENTERLINE OF / / Yr / A // ( y . l h y Mr / b , -� ra 4i .,9 '), s` so, ✓ .ti /�' ,/ CROOKED CREEK DRIVE. a z D O AU m f 9x153' r r /2. o �� 5 EASEMENT TO THE DIAMOND BAR WATER COMPANY FOR WATER PIPES REQ AUGUST 31, 1960 REC IN BK. /y /o•0' 6 - ' r ! ✓ /j r o 4 ti 6s / x D-962, PAGE 305, O.R. AND REC DATE. AUGUST 10, 1964 AS INST. No, 3417 O.R. 0' CURB DETAIL 675 ---fl _ �O-e LOT` > O' �v �o /ir �� w ✓4 P szv .1655 ❑ SURVEYOR'S NOTE' / 0 i d / r >fl d r ti P EASEMENT FOLLOWS THECENTERLINE OF DIAMOND BAR BLVD., NO WIDTH IS GIVEN 12 NTS / GR �� / / R,goY N0° / �0 (.�,�� / ,1.. ^%'a a / /` 5 i ''s. i0.,. / : 0O r / IN THE DOCUMENT FOR REFERENCE ONLY % 3 ARK o �' A ti e / p .y /3' 6t / / a / / / sem, C p % r L Si /X 3' BROW / LEGAL /E / DE�+CR//�T/ON ( ) / / a P, r / 7 o' ✓ 10,' / ^�`, / P' / / . 114. x v ; ; / ^b Q a T / DITCH, nP L GAL S i�� 6 EASEMENT TO THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FOR SANITARY SEWER PURPOSES REC. NOVEMBER 11, 1971 - 3 ❑ AS INST. 3366, OR. 4 /� BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 9 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO 4 EXISTING / / V' / (� 's, ' 6 / / q Rrni /moo ✓v r 'xY /@ MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, GOUTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. UNDERGROUND l / / / A r Iti �� / Q` a 0 ">0 154 55 a �"5 x tj. / EASEMENT TO THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FOR .STORM GRAIN, INGRESS AND EGRESS REG. DATE SURFACE FLOWS G`v. / 0'b 01 •� ' P' / ,11 / s„� sy / 'x 0 7 '1 3 / r lid P'pa0 / MAY iB, 1982 AS INST. 82-508759, 0 R 9 / -z 45 � is x`<v �r � ^ 161.5 lJ> i h/ ' /� ,.�1 o r P- s- / r ,,'' G STATEMENT OF OWNERSHIP / > ^ \ � o r / � / � / `A` az / 154• \%cR ,l'' / ^° br .+�. r / / �26 ' � � � 5 �. o � � � .ti i J � / 'O � \ � ' �u2 1695 / � � < y�J ��- ^� ^OG /./ ✓ 6'S 1� l i� 1548 P' �."�'�� '4 �j5�0V SOA/ O LOT Mv9 Q• 1 \ I _ _ - - / C / �- % Po 46 b ^ > 'il x I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED UNDER MY 1, 1fro m 1 / P / ! s , 6 /+ I / / : es ^ �0 �' SA 90' c, �j� y i� 1 p 2�^ 15' ^ ti y /' SG�� SINGLE FAMILY SUPERVISION AND THAT THE OWNER OF RECORD HAS KNOWLEDGE ((�' r / r 9 15 ,�� m 9 � r 1. o R° ' �� oA° 5 `�' 0� � `✓ s m Pal ^ pa /� vp1^ / OF AND CONSENTS TO THE FILING OF THIS MAP. �. s a \ o / N / �. Pa 5 P� s, b ^ T O - - s.. \ h '1 / i✓ 3' Tnr/ V/ FlRE TRUCK VQ �P 155.0 TURNING RADIUS DETAIL 30' ANDSCAPE SETBACK ( 256 m J� x,32 / / h5 A A P' O NTS / f p s. ^ --- -8. ' / 1 "J 7r�r� �� 1v�i-% �176� � 1 � _ _ I 7py0 - . 5 5 � li u, � R � 4 �i ��i / / Rp 2 � 79.05 �; S r? ICT IID, ,3�1b(J i 55 �� I -p `V• �� /' rt ' y,A x'49. 0 �15J`8 idsV ' /`� �� ^ /o- / Zc 11 � � v �,4P``' , rg 14 � v"7w✓ ^ � yof ,�// p,l 1 / 4 'C' / TYPICAL STREET SECT/ONS 7 v M ^ M z5 �� ' pa1�o 6D;� -.0 y TRE/ f..... 65 P/1560 41p s pyo / /' GO ' l R� � Jl� L�J�J PEDESTRIfAIy ACCESS ONLY \ _ R W RAW l EMERGENCY �2:.> sT r/✓ 1b rn�_ p -'L{1 3% W - / 6s / �� NCREss/EGRESS v e° a" 156' a ^, P 5' 5' / - - f 6 0 saos � -, o ^ c510 � � ss' 15 29' P VARIES h' 11 25' 14' 26' S' 8' VARIES / .� V �' �� rr \ \ a5 p+ Pa se A ^ ME IAN' LANOSCgPE LANDSCAPE 3' TOE DITCH, TYP = t6 ti \ 5 tiPGS / 12' EASEM NT ?, I 1 Mn'T Q5� 1 v ^ 2i '., , s ^o^ 9.15 N oti / � - 2� 15 0' z' T 1• m 8' EASEMENT MqX \ I , ` O 1 2' 74. 14.0' 2' 0.5' EASEMENT o.5• 2' 12.0' 2' 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK L �� _ � 4 +\�s, `S gypsy 1$ / � i' `�� / / ` 0.5' 0.5' 0.5 �T' 0.5' 5' SIDEWALK 5' SIDEWALK t M 'I MpY' C.1 MpL 2\ Mp1' 8" CURB EMERGENCY e A A C / 1 26X 2 5 PARKWAY 5" PARKWAY v � 6 6' CURB & GIJ 6" CURB & GUTTER INGRESS/EGRESS 39 2 \ C�\ �' % % / / \ 2:A M�' I14tak SWALf SWALE Zr'M'4'1' SECTION A -A , K \\ J ¢ ¢ a so 6 5 AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM DATE EDWARD A. MANDICH MAP DATE IDENTIFIER Dn E GF Urex a NGE To Txs MAF 07/30/13 BY: LP 09a19F 13 NUMBER OF UNITS Summary of Areas CONDO NUMBER AREA Lot No. S.F Acres Lot No. S.F Acres 6 7,867 0.181 30 5,127 0.118 7 5,295 0.122 31 6,674 0.153 8 4,945 0.114 32 6,329 0.145 9 4,928 0.113 33 5,346 0.123 10 5,140 0.118 34 4,408 0.101 11 4,857 0.111 35 4,235 0.097 12 4,761 0.109 36 4,227 0.097 13 7,033 0.161 37 4,230 0.097 14 4,902 0.113 38 4,232 0.097 15 4,646 0.107 39 4,462 0.102 16 4,328 0.099 40 4,652 0.107 17 4,682 0.107 41 4,715 0.108 18 7,473 0.172 42 4,924 0.113 19 6,095 0.14 43 5,159 0.118 20 5,022 0.115 44 5,347 0.123 21 5,214 0.12 45 5,297 0.122 22 5,731 0.132 46 5,683 0.13 23 5,419 0.124 47 4,169 0.096 24 7,196 0.165 48 4,808 0.11 25 4,577 0.105 49 5,911 0.135 26 5,214 0.12 50 5,466 0.125 27 5,631 0.129 51 4,645 0.107 28 6,414 0.147 52 5,160 0.118 29 4,763 0.109 DATE EDWARD A. MANDICH MAP DATE IDENTIFIER Dn E GF Urex a NGE To Txs MAF 07/30/13 BY: LP 09a19F 13 EMRY- PORTION O 'A'S RLC/ R/W R/W R/W R/W NORTHERLY L SOUTHERLY RICHT OF WAY TO o pp 4�� At \ AC BERM TOTAL GROSS 247,342 S.F. Sd' R/W 54' R/W R/W R/W BE DEDICATED TO THE / S 'j \ 5.7 AC. UUI 3Q, 2013 (PRIVATE) 46' R/w CITY of DIAMOND BAR / / SECTION 1-1 SECTION J -J SECTION K -K DATE Y 27.0' 27.0' 27.0' AVERAGE GROSS 5,263 S.F. 18`55-162AX 1 �22:3f' 23.8' �--''�' LO 55 � `�- �k EMER(�NCYACCESS ROAD SERVICE ACCESS ROAD PEDESTRIAWSERVICEACCESS ROAD W.O. 1 9.0' _ 36' _ 9.0'1 1 14.0' 26' 14.0' 1 d `" (PRWATE) (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) FEET Oa 7 0(- + SECTION B -B ENTRY - PORTION OF 'A"' STREET (PRIVATE) 1 3•" 209, -� URB �6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB &GUTTER- �8' SIDEWALK SECTION L -L EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) WALL 14' 1100 13' 13' 10' 4'1 2' I cuwv cltWv 2•. CURB &� -CURB & GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER SECTION C -C SECTION D -D 'A' STREET - LOCAL STREET 'IIT - LOCAL STREET (TAPER) PARKING BOTH SIDES NO PARKING (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) F - PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ROW I sa' sa' I f I 8' 42' 8' 4' 42' 8'1 I I I I I 2.0% I 2 09, CUR 6° CURB&GUTTER 8 810 6" CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED S' SIDEWALK 8' SIDEWALK SECTION L -L PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) SECTION E -E Ar STREET - LOCAL STREET PARKING BOTH SIDES (PRIVATE) Oc 117 / O�� / R/W @ r�PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS R/W R%W I®® I 50' 1 60" 8' 50' 50' 1 8' 35' 4' 63' 35' 4' 45' e'1 �1 3' I II 3 I MPX �. � 20% - - - 1 2.09 1'A 2.0% m m CURBT�n L PROPOSED CURB RETAINING WALL -6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK SECTION M -M SECTION M -M EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) 35' 4 35 I Mir _ `-oy 2.OX O C CURB 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK SECTION N -N EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS �►1 F . PROPOSED 0 I IMPROVEMENTS 06 I R/W 50' 1 56' I �- 42' 4' 1 41' I 8' 3' 1 MEDI N I 1 1 I 2.0% I PROPOSE CURB L RETAINIM -6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER -8' SIDEWALK PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK SECTION N -N PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) SECTION F -F PRIVATE STREET (PRIVATE) II k WALL 32' - 31.75' c� a 31 u FL Y8• FL 19' 2.875' `¢' FL 26' " 2.875' MIN. TRAVEL PARKING MIN. TRAVEL MIN. �X -.OX d" ROLLED C" RB 4" ROLLED 0" CURB CURB CURB SECTION G -G SECTION H -H PRIVATF STREET TYPICAL PRIVAIF DRIVE (PRIVATE) AND FlRE LANE (PRIVATE) F - PROPOSED UL IMPROVEMEMS RIA' R/w 92 R/W _ 40' 1 52. 6 1 8' 32' 44' 1 8' I I I I s " CURB &GUTTER 6" CURB & GUAER 6" CURBR�SIDGTC L8 SIOEWALK EXISTING ' WALK 6" CURB & GUTTER SECTION 0-0 SECTION 0-0 EXISTING BREA CANYON ROAD PROPOSED BREA CANYON ROAD (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) DEN.' SING NUA OF( 4 DENSITY SUMMARY NUMBER OF UNITS MULTI -FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO NUMBER AREA AREA DENSITY OF UNITS (ACRES) OF UNITS (DU/ACRE) 62 33 (DU/ACRE) 18.8 5.9 124 E I N C 7.2213 FIRE AND PLANNING LP DATE REVISION BY EMRY- PORTION O 'A'S RLC/ R/W R/W R/W R/W NORTHERLY L SOUTHERLY RICHT OF WAY TO o pp 4�� At \ AC BERM TOTAL GROSS 247,342 S.F. Sd' R/W 54' R/W R/W R/W BE DEDICATED TO THE / S 'j \ 5.7 AC. UUI 3Q, 2013 (PRIVATE) 46' R/w CITY of DIAMOND BAR / / SECTION 1-1 SECTION J -J SECTION K -K DATE Y 27.0' 27.0' 27.0' AVERAGE GROSS 5,263 S.F. 18`55-162AX 1 �22:3f' 23.8' �--''�' LO 55 � `�- �k EMER(�NCYACCESS ROAD SERVICE ACCESS ROAD PEDESTRIAWSERVICEACCESS ROAD W.O. 1 9.0' _ 36' _ 9.0'1 1 14.0' 26' 14.0' 1 d `" (PRWATE) (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) FEET Oa 7 0(- + SECTION B -B ENTRY - PORTION OF 'A"' STREET (PRIVATE) 1 3•" 209, -� URB �6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB &GUTTER- �8' SIDEWALK SECTION L -L EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) WALL 14' 1100 13' 13' 10' 4'1 2' I cuwv cltWv 2•. CURB &� -CURB & GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER SECTION C -C SECTION D -D 'A' STREET - LOCAL STREET 'IIT - LOCAL STREET (TAPER) PARKING BOTH SIDES NO PARKING (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) F - PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ROW I sa' sa' I f I 8' 42' 8' 4' 42' 8'1 I I I I I 2.0% I 2 09, CUR 6° CURB&GUTTER 8 810 6" CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED S' SIDEWALK 8' SIDEWALK SECTION L -L PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) SECTION E -E Ar STREET - LOCAL STREET PARKING BOTH SIDES (PRIVATE) Oc 117 / O�� / R/W @ r�PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS R/W R%W I®® I 50' 1 60" 8' 50' 50' 1 8' 35' 4' 63' 35' 4' 45' e'1 �1 3' I II 3 I MPX �. � 20% - - - 1 2.09 1'A 2.0% m m CURBT�n L PROPOSED CURB RETAINING WALL -6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK SECTION M -M SECTION M -M EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) 35' 4 35 I Mir _ `-oy 2.OX O C CURB 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK SECTION N -N EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS �►1 F . PROPOSED 0 I IMPROVEMENTS 06 I R/W 50' 1 56' I �- 42' 4' 1 41' I 8' 3' 1 MEDI N I 1 1 I 2.0% I PROPOSE CURB L RETAINIM -6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER -8' SIDEWALK PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK SECTION N -N PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) SECTION F -F PRIVATE STREET (PRIVATE) II k WALL 32' - 31.75' c� a 31 u FL Y8• FL 19' 2.875' `¢' FL 26' " 2.875' MIN. TRAVEL PARKING MIN. TRAVEL MIN. �X -.OX d" ROLLED C" RB 4" ROLLED 0" CURB CURB CURB SECTION G -G SECTION H -H PRIVATF STREET TYPICAL PRIVAIF DRIVE (PRIVATE) AND FlRE LANE (PRIVATE) F - PROPOSED UL IMPROVEMEMS RIA' R/w 92 R/W _ 40' 1 52. 6 1 8' 32' 44' 1 8' I I I I s " CURB &GUTTER 6" CURB & GUAER 6" CURBR�SIDGTC L8 SIOEWALK EXISTING ' WALK 6" CURB & GUTTER SECTION 0-0 SECTION 0-0 EXISTING BREA CANYON ROAD PROPOSED BREA CANYON ROAD (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) DEN.' SING NUA OF( 4 DENSITY SUMMARY NUMBER OF UNITS MULTI -FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO NUMBER AREA AREA DENSITY OF UNITS (ACRES) OF UNITS (DU/ACRE) 62 33 (DU/ACRE) 18.8 DENSITY SUMMARY NUMBER OF UNITS SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDO NUMBER AREA COVERED GUEST " (2 PER UNIT) DENSITY OF UNITS (ACRES) 94 185 (DU/ACRE) 73 5.9 124 PARKING SUMMARY - SINGLE FAMILY NUMBER OF UNITS REQUIRED PROVIDED COVERED (2 PER UNIT) GUEST (V3 PER UNIT) COVERED GUEST " (2 PER UNIT) TOTALS 47 94 32 94 185 IN(.LVUL3 UN•51Ktt1 PAKKIIV(, AINU L LiV1,51 3PA(.t5 IN UKIVEWAY PARKING SUMMARY - MULTI -FAMILY NUMBER OF UNITS REQUIRED PROVIDED COVERED (2 PER UNIT) GUEST (V3 PER UNIT) COVERED (2 PER UNIT) GUEST TOTALS 135 270 90 270 105 0 30 60 120 11 0 1/2 1 2 HUNSAKER INCH;S z PREPARED FOR.• OWNER. - LENNAR0 25 ENTERPRISE AUSO VIEJO, CA 92656 (949) 349-8100 GROSS AREA CONTOUR INTERVAL TOTAL LOTS PREPARED BY- O O i WILL O W HEIGHTS I h VES TING TEN TA T1 VE TRACT 72295 Nt F: \0718\Planning\OA-Project \TTM\071SP_TTM . dwg m 11 HUNSAKER 6c ASSOCIATES z I R V I N E I N C CL PLANNING ENGINEERING - 5URVEYINC Three Hughes IMre, CA 93618 F%: (949) SRYU759 PH: (949) 5041110 WILL O W HEIGHTS I h VES TING TEN TA T1 VE TRACT 72295 Nt F: \0718\Planning\OA-Project \TTM\071SP_TTM . dwg VINYL FENCE DETAIL TUBULAR 5TEEL FENCE DETAIL SECT101 SCALE FOOTING MASONRY WALL DETAIL MASONRY BLOCK WALL DETAIL BLOCK :IN15H "URE >VE FOOTING P05T5 PICKETS 5H \DE LEGEND MASONRY BLOCK WALL WITH PLASTER FINISH TO MATCH ARCHITECTURE — PER DETAIL «««««»»««»»»»» 6' TUBULAR STEEL FENCE VINYL PRIVACY FENCE COLOR: BEIGE 42" TUBULAR STEEL FENCE 1 I 8860 \ gy � \ 87 93 \ _ / .TRACT No. 25991 13 \ M.B. 702, PGS 16 TO 21 82 86 92 / \ 14 83 \ 85 - / V— 15 \ - \ 2 \ / / �\ \ 84 / on / 15 i 14 \\ \ 13 12 16 TRACT No. 25991 TRACT No. 33417 \ \ j ; \ rrJri�ar�\ice's '��jf i \,�\ r r r a ra r \ ` \ / / \ / d \ /1/�� -87.3i P(7 SJR rC)-6� M.B. 702, PGS 16 TO 21 M.B. 909, PGv537 TO 39 \ 4 TRACT o X2974 1 �I 7 rrL �aT 1vh `- 4) '`v O A v v1 vv 1 / �-" - �P \ \, � \I. \\ `\ M.B. 873, PGS 50 TO 56 1 1 V 18 > �� / INTEGRAL COLOR SPLIT FACE 19 BLOCK RETAINING WALL, TYP. / (SEE CIVIL PLANS) a� v , � \ o wPtle , o l COLOR: TAN � / — 0` \� 'VERDURA' PLANTED INTEi COLOR RETAINING WALL, TYP. 146 / / � / ti \\ "�� ,.g �" \ \ — - (SEE CIVIL PLANS) / rfl r/JAh .269-691d� vv COLOR: TAN / 142 / d, \1 \ / / /r 'iES 1-5� x\ a 5 uA /FdAfN GARDEJ,,P / / �, , / i vv v /r / ,/ /PAfjK/ ASI'X/ IN / - r / XZ O� / �/ / // �I �/ / /'` r 1 I // // •r n r� /' \ / a \i\-\\ / / rrr'/ \ I \ \ ly 76 SARK / / v /')1117/ �� 4 \ r 11 40 / \\ ti 'TRACT 27�07 39 �Q M.B. 7i,� (10 25 38 Azll� �Q ' r \ \ V A /,'(r�' 2 / ,Q29 \ 26 \ Tr -140T /\h \ \ 30 TRACT No. 3416,0 31 M.B. 900 PGS 20 TO 25 32 12 < / 33 / 34 /V i TRACT No. 25989 3 i� \ 38 \ 3 \\ M.B. 714, PGS 5 TO 7 " 14 'VERDURA' PLANTED INTEGRAL / 37 \� / O` " \. �' \ \ 15 \ \ \ COLOR RETAINING WALL, T1'P. 36 \\ / QO y \ \ \\ (SEE CIVIL PLANS) > s / COLOR: TAN �Q \ \ \ \` FEET \ 17 \ \ 0 30 60 120 \ \ 0 1/21 2 \ INCHES 18 \ PREPARED FOR. PREPARED BY.- \ OWNER: FENCE AND WALL PLAN LENNAR` 25 ENTERPRISE ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656 (949) 349-8100 DESIGN Rj M GROUP 31591 Camino Capistrano San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 www. RJ Mdesigngmup.com [9491493-2690fax 19491493-2600 uhone WILL O W HEIGHTS TEN TA T1 VE TRACT PROJECT PROF/LES (VERTICAL & HORIZONTAL SCALE: V" 60') LEGEND VIEW PROFILE #1 VIEW PROFILE #4 ----- NATURAL GROUND DESIGN GROUND 2 PROPOSED GRADING PROJECT BOUNDARY LINE TOP OF SLOPE 840 800 760 720 680 640 u�V Summar 800 Soo- 760 7s 720 720 240 280 320 MSE WALL MSE A OSED PMSE OWAL POSED RETAINING WALL HEIGHT 31 NING WALL - a� P / 1 \ 800 660 CENTERLINE 1009 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK 5,140 DW PROPOSED WATER 640 � RETOA CLUSTER UNITS XISTIN :.z � 00 h O ENHANCED PAVEMENT p 5 PROPOSED SEWER OPOSE " a 8 ST. .PLAN 3 29 PROPOSED -SD- PROPOSED STORM DRAIN .,Lr v 6.0'- 720 5' RIK RETAINING WALL/ 4-PLEX 2 FIRE HYDRANT 40 ---- PROPOSED '16-18 SUBTOTAL 61 18 182 4,924 PR Lot 10 PROPOSED pl ml ADE - lO WON,' BLVD. MSE ALL P Pad + 7082- _- ;P.d=76 46 5,683 - - 0 . xisi 47 ----- EXI ---- TING G --- - ADE -z ad=757.. ---- "A" ST. Pad 60.0* 26 0' Pa =766.0' m P PROPOSED GRADE 4645 28 6,414 PRC POSED MSE WAI LPadI Lot 49 Lot 441 GR d=711 2 > N ¢ I N I� hm p PR POSED MSE W LL _ + Lot PROW "A"S ED . - Pad= + PROP 'A' ED T. ad=774. s Lot 2 ,- Lot 4 Lot 24 ____ ____ mi0i p ---_ km -- I ROPOS 11.N D PROPOSED MSE ALL _____!ROPOSFD ACCESS OND BAR PROPOSED AC __ ESS ---- PR P ACCESS ---- SED ---- ---- - - - =727.5 --- ------- ---- ---- -------------- ' BLVD. j ------ Lot 6 -- ---- ---- E EXISTING STING o_ ARK I XISTIN ---- ---- 1 1 ---------+ _ry2 C BREA N. RD. I BREA CY . CHANNEL i _ RAIN 'PARK ,,-- RDEN BASIN P - d-7083 Lot 1 PROP Pad- L 08.6- t 1 WALL Pad=7 Lot 7.8' Pad= L 07.4' 1 ISTINC GROUNDM P OPOSE RETAIN NG WA PR L POSED GRADE r: p m 40 RO 190 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680 720 760 800 840 880 920 960 1000 1040 1080 1120 7760 1200 1240 1280 7320 1360 7400 1440 1480 1520 1560 16 u�V Summar 800 Soo- 760 7s 720 720 u�V Summar N ¢ pPad--754A"ST. PLAN TYPE # OF BLDGS. p PROPOSED F' H' LOT LINE 240 280 320 MSE WALL MSE A OSED PMSE OWAL POSED RETAINING WALL HEIGHT 31 NING WALL - a� P / 1 \ 800 660 CENTERLINE 1009 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK 5,140 DW PROPOSED WATER 640 � RETOA CLUSTER UNITS XISTIN :.z � 00 h O ENHANCED PAVEMENT p 5 PROPOSED SEWER OPOSE " a 8 ST. .PLAN 3 29 PROPOSED -SD- PROPOSED STORM DRAIN .,Lr v 6.0'- 720 5' RIK RETAINING WALL/ 4-PLEX 2 FIRE HYDRANT 40 ---- PROPOSED '16-18 SUBTOTAL 61 18 182 4,924 PR Lot 10 PROPOSED pl ml ADE - lO WON,' BLVD. MSE ALL P Pad + 7082- _- ;P.d=76 46 5,683 - - 0 . xisi 47 ----- EXI ---- TING G --- - ADE -z ad=757.. ---- "A" ST. Pad 60.0* 26 0' Pa =766.0' m P ADO R. 4645 28 6,414 Si of Lot 1 1 4,763 Lot 49 Lot 441 GR d=711 u�V Summar N ¢ pPad--754A"ST. PLAN TYPE # OF BLDGS. p PROPOSED F' H' LOT LINE 240 280 320 MSE WALL MSE A OSED PMSE OWAL POSED RETAINING WALL HEIGHT 31 NING WALL - EASEMENT LINE P / 1 \ 800 660 CENTERLINE 1009 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK 5,140 DW PROPOSED WATER 640 � 4,857 CLUSTER UNITS XISTIN :.z � 00 Iq ENHANCED PAVEMENT 750 5 PROPOSED SEWER OPOSE " a 8 ST. .PLAN 3 29 PROPOSED -SD- PROPOSED STORM DRAIN .,Lr v 6.0'- 720 5' RIK RETAINING WALL/ 4-PLEX 2 FIRE HYDRANT / , n v 'r?r1 Ll Ala. 25DDI ' 60x70 LOT V/C/N/TY MAP .. 00 \\\ AO \ PROPOSED 8' / NOTES VIEW PROFILE #2 �p _ - - NATURAL ND PROPOSED GRADING A V A SIDEWALK , Boo- 760 - 680 00 _ _ _ \ \ \ F \ TO BE RELOCATED SINGLE FA MIL Y \ 7C EX. POWER POLE 760 Tz0 680 Summar N ¢ pPad--754A"ST. PLAN TYPE # OF BLDGS. p PROPOSED F' H' 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 PMSE OWAL POSED RETAINING WALL HEIGHT 31 PLAN 1 24 24 511 P / 1 \ SEWER DRAIN LOW PLOW MP -40 MEDIA FILTER 660 47 1009 SINGLE FAMILY 5,140 / DIVERSION STRUCTURE TREATMENT BMP 640 � 4,857 CLUSTER UNITS XISTIN :.z � 00 PLAN 1 18 I� lope a / , n v 'r?r1 Ll Ala. 25DDI ' 60x70 LOT V/C/N/TY MAP .. 00 \\\ AO \ PROPOSED 8' / NOTES VIEW PROFILE #2 �p _ - - NATURAL ND PROPOSED GRADING A V A SIDEWALK , Boo- 760 - 680 00 _ _ _ \ \ \ F \ TO BE RELOCATED SINGLE FA MIL Y \ 7C EX. POWER POLE 760 Tz0 680 � i 760 V A O EX R/W b' t06 'F? ' ' Al � v A A EX, CURB &� o � ,T, o PITCH• ry /� �PROPOSED CURB �m R m 2"erNL 720 \ \\ \ \ \ PROPOSED R/W go \ \ -EXISTING 8"" SEWER \ \ ` / 0 �X, SIGNAGE TO BE RELOC9TED ,� 1R5 \�\ RL 680 •,,\ o 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680 .720 760 800. 840 880. 920 960. 1000 1040 1080 1120 \� o - �• / Ps �`' \�` Y _r ) y n \\ CONNECT 70 EX. 10" ACP WATER 8�`�p' ^ / •.:.- 90 35 / 5 \ \\ m l r�r� l Alii. 32D i EXISTING 8 SEWER R \ $ 9 VIEW PROFILE #3 PROPOSED GRADING A'\`BP V-9 )y r' BaoNATURAL PROPOSED MEDIAN p O,` &., / 15 RrN 5 \ r \ �\ dJ IYJ-J JAM, J� ✓� �J 7'0 -58 ^ w 800" 760 720 680 Summar N ¢ pPad--754A"ST. PLAN TYPE # OF BLDGS. p PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY S.F 6 DETACHED 60X70 30 PMSE OWAL POSED 5,295 31 PLAN 1 24 24 511 P "A" ST 491 SUBTOTAL 47 1009 SINGLE FAMILY 5,140 34 _-------- 11 4,857 CLUSTER UNITS XISTIN :.z � 00 PLAN 1 18 I� lope a /r --------------------------------------- 16 OPOSE " a 8 ST. .PLAN 3 29 PROPOSED 401 SUBTOTAL Pad=7 6.0'- MULTI -FAMILY UNITS 39 4,462 4-PLEX 2 8 40 ---- Lots - '16-18 SUBTOTAL 61 18 182 4,924 PR Lot 10 PROPOSED 5,159 ADE - 5,022 WON,' BLVD. 5,347 of 29 ' Pad + 7082- _- 5,731 46 5,683 - - 0 . 5,419 47 ----- EXI ---- TING G --- - ADE -z - -- ---- - WALL 5,911 26 _ a 50 m 27 15 631 -- 4645 28 6,414 Si 5,160 Lot 1 1 4,763 � i 760 V A O EX R/W b' t06 'F? ' ' Al � v A A EX, CURB &� o � ,T, o PITCH• ry /� �PROPOSED CURB �m R m 2"erNL 720 \ \\ \ \ \ PROPOSED R/W go \ \ -EXISTING 8"" SEWER \ \ ` / 0 �X, SIGNAGE TO BE RELOC9TED ,� 1R5 \�\ RL 680 •,,\ o 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680 .720 760 800. 840 880. 920 960. 1000 1040 1080 1120 \� o - �• / Ps �`' \�` Y _r ) y n \\ CONNECT 70 EX. 10" ACP WATER 8�`�p' ^ / •.:.- 90 35 / 5 \ \\ m l r�r� l Alii. 32D i EXISTING 8 SEWER R \ $ 9 VIEW PROFILE #3 PROPOSED GRADING A'\`BP V-9 )y r' BaoNATURAL PROPOSED MEDIAN p O,` &., / 15 RrN 5 \ r \ �\ dJ IYJ-J JAM, J� ✓� �J 7'0 -58 ^ w 800" 760 720 680 840 <O\ Z '. S`p1PM Y,yps1 , `�\• o> > s 3y8'\ \ Nei EX SIGNAGE TO BE = �-1 gym\ To BE RELOCATED 800 lrStl\i:l AIL- 331411y o S a �R' � 0 „+ � AA• ROti I v PROPOSED SIGNAL .QW o y ® s N • 1V• ps11 o i� cn� CONNECT TO EXISTING R" 7s6 10" s _ r 1\5 20� s. '�\ \♦ r P' 6 o �kd ". pgRpONDP 1� i 720 v W 65 - .� St IRA \ w .. ps12 . r �l (y ps1395 \ ----R \p WSMt BUILDING SUMMARY Vo 30" LANDS P s 7 .^ 9 2 P 10 g No � Summar I of Areas PLAN TYPE # OF BLDGS. # OF UNITS X OF TOTAL SINGLE FAMILY S.F 6 DETACHED 60X70 30 5,127 CLUSTER UNITS 5,295 31 PLAN 1 24 24 511 PLAN 2 23 23 491 SUBTOTAL 47 1009 SINGLE FAMILY 5,140 34 CONDOMINIUMS 11 4,857 CLUSTER UNITS 4,235 12 PLAN 1 18 18 251 PLAN 2 26 16 351 .PLAN 3 29 PROPOSED 401 SUBTOTAL Pad=7 6.0'- MULTI -FAMILY UNITS 39 4,462 4-PLEX 2 8 40 6-PLEX 9 a oe OW SUBTOTAL 61 18 OTAL # OF UNITS 182 4,924 PR POSED 43 5,159 20 5,022 "A" ST 5,347 of 29 30 45 5,297 _- 5,731 46 5,683 23 5,419 47 4,169 EXIS ING DE 4,808 25 MS WALL 5,911 26 _ a 50 5466 27 15 631 -- 4645 28 6,414 Si 5,160 29 1 4,763 GR I� hm p Lot 9 - (STING __----- -- ____ ____ --- -- ---_ --- -- Lr 04 S DI OND BAR . - - P OPOSE pa =727.5 BLVD. j Pates 25' Pa =7220* "e" ST. 1 1 PROP SED RE AINING WALL P OPOSE RETAIN NG WA PR L POSED GRADE m 840 <O\ Z '. S`p1PM Y,yps1 , `�\• o> > s 3y8'\ \ Nei EX SIGNAGE TO BE = �-1 gym\ To BE RELOCATED 800 lrStl\i:l AIL- 331411y o S a �R' � 0 „+ � AA• ROti I v PROPOSED SIGNAL .QW o y ® s N • 1V• ps11 o i� cn� CONNECT TO EXISTING R" 7s6 10" s _ r 1\5 20� s. '�\ \♦ r P' 6 o �kd ". pgRpONDP 1� i 720 v W 65 - .� St IRA \ w .. ps12 . r �l (y ps1395 \ ----R \p WSMt BUILDING SUMMARY Vo 30" LANDS P s 7 .^ 9 2 P 10 g No � Summar I of Areas PLAN TYPE # OF BLDGS. # OF UNITS X OF TOTAL SINGLE FAMILY S.F 6 DETACHED 60X70 30 5,127 CLUSTER UNITS 5,295 31 PLAN 1 24 24 511 PLAN 2 23 23 491 SUBTOTAL 47 1009 SINGLE FAMILY 5,140 34 CONDOMINIUMS 11 4,857 CLUSTER UNITS 4,235 12 PLAN 1 18 18 251 PLAN 2 26 16 351 .PLAN 3 29 29 401 SUBTOTAL 73 1001 MULTI -FAMILY UNITS 39 4,462 4-PLEX 2 8 40 6-PLEX 9 54 4,682 SUBTOTAL 61 18 OTAL # OF UNITS 182 4,924 1. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 8714-002-900, 8714-002-901, 8714-002-902, 8714-002-903 AND 8714-015-901. 2 EXISTING & PROPOSED ZONING: SITE D SPECIFIC PLAN 3. EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT 4, PROPOSED LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL 5. EXISTING & PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN: SPECIFIC PLAN, SITE D. 6. ALL STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND GRADING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DIAMOND BAR STANDARDS, ORDINANCES AND APPROVED MODIFICATIONS HERETO. 7. ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD SHALL BE ACCOMMODATED ON THE FINAL DESIGN, OR THEY SHALL BE EITHER QUITCLAIMED, ABANDONED OR RELOCATED TO THE SATISFACTION OF ALL INTERESTED PARTIES. DRAINAGE AND PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS NECESSARY TO SERVE THIS PROJECT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AND WITH THE UTILITY PURVEYORS. EXISTING STORM DRAIN EASEMENTS WILL BE ABANDONED DURING THE FINAL MAP PROCEDURES. & MULTI FAMILY BUILDING TO MEET NFPA 13 STANDARDS. 9. ESTIMATED EARTHWORK QUANTITIES: 415,500 CYS. CUT, 415,500 CYS. FILL. 10. SEWER SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT. 11. PER LA COUNTY FIRM PANEL 1880 OF 2350. 12. PRIVATE WATER QUALITY BAI TO BE MAINTAINED BY H.O.A. 13. LOTS 62 & 63 ARE TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR & MAINTAINED BY THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. 14. ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG DIAMOND BAR BLVD, BREA CANYON RD AND % 680 1' I 1 I - -- -. �3 A • ` • \ , \ PASADO ON. TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. "} - o ao 86 120 Iso zoo zao zao szo sso aoo aao aao szo 560 soo 640 sao 72o Iso aoo aao aeo azo TOTAL GROSS 247,342 S.F. _ $96 \ Ps - " "� - sl ' '� 2' ps1 .+ \\ \ ` - -- EX SIGNAGE TO BE -o '•' N P \ E 5.7 A0. 15 ALL TRASH IS INDIVIDUAL PICK UP BY WASTE MANAGEMENT. TRASH PICK UP .FOR / .Q h o ^ 5-(R <cy \ \ ✓ \ wP 5 AVERAGE GROSS 5,263 S.F.' 6' _ 1 i0 BE RELOCATED ry m o o \/ _ 0 Bm"0 \ \ q00 \ o j6 MSE LOTS 2 THROUGH 5 NEEDS i0 BE LOCATED ON "B" STREET. TRASH PICK UP FOR ,/ `"' a, o m - ` p§. _ �• .� s1 9 s1 \ \ l ps1 LOT i WILL BE ALONG THE LOOP ALLEY. 6" a i.6" Y ) _ r r RIGHT -OF WAY TO 'i p /`^ • P - CF.IPER /PLA N 6" 12" 12" J TO l vlr!'T Jva -T6r�r%I ��fJJ / OW BE DEDICATED i E - \ \ \ `° ""� p p p4 \ \ CITY OF DI D BAR � • 60 � ps1 \ 1 W5' LOTS 1-5 TO BE MAPPED FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES. - o e ,� \ c 1 ,,, 165 ✓� m � \ � \ P ps1 \\ � r \ R-3' PER PLAN / o / EX, 12" ACP WATER �5 1h"�•;. • Ps1 o a �, s� 0 w - \ �; 1 65 ` \• ` pW 17 STORM DRAIN SYSTEM TO BE PRIVATE. AO y UT/L/TY AGENC/E o / e / R _, - , 26 1°1p1°6 a9% \ P L9 Ot \\ •\�♦ Ps1 °' \� g• BN•nP SCHOOL DISTRICT: POSTAL SERVICE: R=1/2" R=1/2" FL R= 112* / l � _ En BE TO BE \ �/ OW ` - ' 0 'I WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WALNUT VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT USPS _. EXISTING TREES 70 BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED PER TREE SURVEY. el • '' ^ PROPOSED MEDIA / - / P \ �. s 16p • \ ��. ,. \ ps1 P \ \ ,. \ 1 271 S. BREA CANYON ROAD 880 SOUTH LEMON AVE. 1317 SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BLVD. - = ,' 413.P. w \ 1g15 • \• 0' 5 w4[ \ \ \\ WALNUT, CA 91789 WALNUT, CA 91789 DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 • :' __�� P09 POLE ? h i '� 2 / ( ) ( ) " Ex o , t . 1` - P° 9• \ 909 595-7554 eoD 275-6777 LOT SUMMARY �o .. TO BE RELO .. 10p �QI ♦ 14$ \ \ ♦ •. 6 PROPOSED SIGNAL l MoOlFica TION AT / PPROPosED R Rw -_ y , o o �//�'- . `�s q6\\ 1 ,, \797 A�o. wP♦s1 \ cs I i\ /\ �� 60 N� N� 6r5 \ •\ \ Y 2 5P \\ I1fDEpWONE SERVICE: TRASH: SINGLE FAMILY HOMES) SEWER SERVICE: TRUNK LINES Lot No. Land Use LdB ACtBB 24DIAMOND BAR BLVD. WASTE MANAGEMENT INC. LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT &BREA CANYON RD. 1400 PHILLIPS RANCH RD. 13940 E. LIVE OAK AVE. 1955 WORKMAN MILL ROAD LOT1 MULTI -FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO 62 3.3 ^ L� /y �p GUM - - - - LOTS 2-5 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDOS 73 5.9 4' ROLLED CURB k GUTTER 6 CURB & GUI ,C^ ` s _--- / m m W / e p •`\ \1 pot 53 / 11 \ N y 1� A (O )NA, - 91766 (800) 266-7551 (562) 699-7411 _ Ex. R w � ° � \\ BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 WHITTIER, CA 90507 ED 47 NTS NTS � _ \+� \\ '�t" o 2 . \ 0 1 g \\ 800 483-5000 - _" -EX CCURB _ .3' rt 121\\ „ 8 FK \ ` ` 5 \ \ P �• LOTS 6-52 SINGLE FAMILY DETACH 5 7 --- /` ,150 - \ I \ \ 118• `' 1'R' :.. p,1 3 " ELECTRIC SERVICE: (EOR REFERENCE ONLY) (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) EX. POWER POLE '� - - / --- " P \` s \y c�R� ' �' ^' �\ Ps 0 \' 1 ae 60 \ TRASH: (FOR MULTI -FAMILY) SEWER SERVICE: (MAIN LINES) LOT 53-57 SLOPES/OPEN SPACE 5.7 70 BE RELOCATED -� ^- "'-- - i `\ `\ 1\ ?\� P q % �-( 154 °>\ o\ \ o, ♦ 5 ps1 9• / -\ \ SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. VALLEY VISTA INC. LOS ANGELES COUNTY OF PUBLIC WORKS - --� -' rR \ • q � % RE��. � ps1 w se I � 5'<y'L 800 CIENEGA AVE, 13940E LIVE OAK AVE. SEWER MAINTENANCE DISTRICT LOT 58 PRIVATE STREETS 4.0 SAN DIMAS, CA V91773 1 BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 900 FREEMONT LOT // o $0 683 BE _^ ip' Z° \ �'ro P (800) 655-4555 00) 266-7551 ALHAMB A - 1 3�8 RIGHY-OF-WAVY 680 \- ps V1 �' �\ ". 1b0 ri LOT 62 6 RAIN AGARDEN PARK/BASIN 1 0�� / (8 RA C 01 p 4 1 �FMP-4o oRM DRAIN , \\ \ ps1 11 V-6 0 31 1 a o 1 0%` Rar r GAS SERVICE: 3' BE DEDICATED r THE / I 6 V - _�! 1 CABLE N: p p / µ1EDTA FILTER LOW FLOW , _ P 11 w. 1 w 11 ' \ 1 3 _ ✓ / 3' BROW IiY OF DI MOND BAR a / NREATMEN B P � 2/ SISION 10 s1�1 ' �<`'' Ps ` , " • ` 6� 1 Psj6 o m L r' ON H. TYP SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. TIME WARNER LOT 63 PARK 0.9 GARAGE __, - � P \� �- - \ � � I I `A`•- _ / 1919 S. STATE COLLEGE BLVD. 0, DOOR / r _ \ CTURE m .. 6 \ I o \ c / rr ryq, rr 1041 E ROUTE 66 RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATED TO 0.5 / \ \ \ - pyc� \ l X106 a - s is (800) 427-220006 �I 1 \v 1 S �c r� GLENDORA, CA 91740 TOTAL THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 182 29.9 �. 2% MIN 25 �-'----- :. ;t bc ,. _. \ l \. ,_. Q � 4 • s1 3 r� r' i�� s oti+ I \\ p rr BENCH MARK - a /. 4' 1'L 1140± _ P' •F'a, I f _ I 1 rr � '<�%`• / ' oA $ - - o <t ; � ; � '. 1 "' ` ps1 Ps ` m qc -' . I I I .5 /,? ,,,,0 2 I. r. LOS ANGELES COUNTY BENCHMARK NO. G 5073 ELEVATION: 726.809 DATUM: NAVD 88, Ex. CAL BUILDINGS 2005 ADJUSTMENT / 135 _ I I o \ ' ` 1 - i 3' TOE ) P/ SCALE. 1 "=50, D EX R W /i r • - ,. r, 740 - I / 00/ �. / ✓ ! ^ 'La r DESCRIPTION: EX POWER POLE / / yC�OP 0\N /,- / / . - '- / b F ..Et• � 1 � 2 s :� ps `n ' 'yo i r DITCH, TYP • TY /NGS �i` R, ' �. z9 R o 0' CURB DETAIL AND UTILITIES PR POgED CURB F �/ p _r� Q ? J y' �l LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TAG IN EAST CURB OF DIAMOND KITS TO BE RELOCATED / / -� / ;n p0 ' �� / / ,' / � " l - I � - /� %f' G \ -- / , r; ;� _ SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDO MULTI FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO BAR BLVD. 42.7 FEET EAST OF CENTERLINE AND 95 FEET NORTH OF CENTERLINE OF PROPOSED R/W / 10 sl .: ' g0E`'� i g •O ° r (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) / / /. / h /. , > P _ _--. /.., Ps o. \ b r ,% 110.2 - 111.0 CROOKED CREEK DRIVE. / �. / _ > 12 ? PEDESTRIAN l l / � / ^ Of o1 / 0 � � ° a � , m''z 1 1 ,38 (SSWALK / ep � / / � ' r 29. g5, \ -. � � Xr 107.7 41.5' 28.0' 41.5' CURB n / �p / "� / �A' / W >22 , s / \ O / A' i _;G'. X10 �'' A� �l`\\* q', 1 N'k r.r / - , \ cuRo LEGAL DESCRIPTION ( / A 10.0' W 26' r' ' \ - /5, >o - 9' 6 AQV_. r -c _ , ' r/ v r, 32' BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 9 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO / / / ,r e a :! 2 CP 5 / / r '' - �'ss,1b'51. // , / / 90 ` , Try'v� � rrr MIN. MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, GOUTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Ypr� o\S,gA•r ^.� 5- A1�' ',%'rY�• r % ,,:.1psI/ r-> B � �/4 �/ gp,0A7b =,� vv v vL.. .�P3', , 4' r / r' .r 5.5' 317" o w I 5.5 94.5' 2 D 7 DEVELOPMENT S TANDARDS L 38.8' BROW ARK PER SITE D SPECIFIC PLAN 5 / - e 14 7.5' 75' GFRE TRUCK s / 5.5' 4 134.5' DEVELOPMENT STANDARD/LOWMEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL REQUIRED PROVIDEDTURNING RADIUS DETAIL 4 XISTING NDERGROUND 10.0' MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS 200 182 Al MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE 60% 41.9% TYPICAL �- z°• 0 , . I ro 5.5' - \I - - /> 1 , ',_-- - MINIMUM YARD SETBACKS: FRONT YARD 10 FEET 10 FEET tAr REAR YARD 15 FEET 88 FEET*OFF-STREET PARK/NG QNTS p ,v ' 0/ 75. SIDE YARD INTERIOR 10 FEET ONE 10 FEET * SIDE 5 OTHER CURB 12,2' SIDE YARD STREET 10 FEET STREET 10 FEET 5 / SIDE 5 ON OTHER 5 FEET wNEEL9'- SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED (60X70) r LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS 15% 6. 3' To STOP \� // ^^m°/ \ g0 / /' ,' ,3 00' ` / �� r OITCw TYP PRIVATE LANDSCAPED AREAS 15% OS r i 1.. - 16° r'' / s. Tr'7r1Cr l2 )r/-Jrr- / // /(w /�', VQ0�- `70 �•' ;`/ j � /� , SS II I II II1 ?.ts�. m -% �^o\ I _ � �_ �„ o /41 /_ ry ^^ti. • `r \O. ^` or r 3r \ P16 010- X8680. 0�' 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK � COMMON LANDSCAPED AREAS 4'4% 18.8' TOTAL LANDSCAPED AREAS 59% .os >r.r A10 jr160 PARKING SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED ExsnNc RESIDENT PARKING 94 2 ENCLOSED 94 ESM7 5.0' -4 I 0'5.0' 700 SPACES PER UNT) 5.0GUEST PARKING 32 (1 SPACE PER 3 185 5.REQUIRED RESIDENT SPACES) ROW PARKING SINGLE FAMILY TYPICAL STREET SECT/ONS , RE 11. 2' 19.Q' CONDO/MULTI-FAMILY. DITCH, TYR 70.0' 19.8' RESIDENT PARKING 270 1 ENCLOSED SPACE PER 270 r SERVICE RO/D AND A _> 9 - O rr r� CT No, 2{JF�{� PEDESTRIA)V ACCESS ONLY - 1 BEDROOM UNIT, 2 ENCLOSED ' l EMERGENCY INGRE55/CGRE55 _ SPACES PER UNITS WITH 2 w ggqq OR MORE BEDROOMS) � <; / � � � j � � 'rl TCH, TYP Fe 0`)" E �`L /U/ GUEST PARKING 90 (1 SPACE PER 3 "11 19 3' TOE DITCH, TYP �� \-@" `� r s REQUIRED RESIDENT SPACES) y . w ` 'k �. A �� b� til` fz' EASEM Nr AJ --- -. - I \ 1. ? / 8' EASEMENT 2' 15.0' 2' TOTAL PARKING TVP/CAL ON STREET \ I \ / y iq, 1q•p• p• OS' EASEMENT D.5• 2' 12. e' 2' RESIDENT PARKING. 364 364 PARALLEL PARK/NG / ^a-. m` / os' os' 0.5 _ 0.5' NTS. GUEST PARKING. 122 296 � 3d' LANDSCAPE SETBACK v Pv �� / EMERGENCY 90 \ \ I ' ,`' 2'1 OP 7/ ,2 111 2 1 2111 CURB INGRESS/EGRESS ` \ / i6o % / / \ pK z, 4,pi z, » DEVIATION TO SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SETBACKS REQUIRED 1�1 fd' / \ Z` 0 �4.Y SWALE SWALE Z.1 1 'Na"Y E ¢ NORTHERLY CL SOUTHERLY \ `s' �y \\ AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM) R/w BERM ° R/W R/W R/W R/W 46' R/W R RIGHT-OF-WAY TO SECTION A -A ENTRY - PORTION OF "A" STREET (PRIVATE) SECTION B -B ENTRY - PORTION OF "A" STREET (PRIVATE) 50' 50' 8' 42' 4' 35' 8' i M DI IN I 3• 2,07 2.0% 6' CURB & GUTTER CURB 6" CURB & GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK SECTION L -L EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) WALL 54R/W 54' I BTDEDICATEDPFND BAR _ ' �� ,'- / SECTION 1-1 SECTION J -J SECTION K -K 23.0' 23.0' _ 27'0' 27'0' 27'0' 27'01 I/ o. k EMERGENCY ACCESS ROAD SERVICE ACCESS ROAD PEDESTRIAWSERWaACGESS ROAD 36'LOT 55 I 14.0' 26' 14.0' I ---�-- I / ' S' _ (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) IfA' 1A' S'I A. /r\\ '4- 10 IS 1 IS I IU 4 2' - 8' -- Br - 2' ♦- ,.", i /. PKWY PKWY Y 22 .,y 2� l��RKI p0 "55 SIDEWALK SIDEW QP v\ a• 32'31.75'SIDEWALK SIDEWALK 5 , I, J w wCURB & CURB & CURB �� ¢ GUTTER GUTTER t1 TETE" FL u FL FL cQi FL GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER 4' 28' 4' 3' 28' 19' 2.875' 26' 2.875' SECTION C -C SECTION D -D NOR STREET LOCA( STREET MIN. TRAVEL MIN. MIN. TRAVEL PARKING MIN. TRAVEL MIN. 'A' STREET - LOCAL STREET 'A' STREET • LOCAL STREET (TAPER) PARKING BOTH SIDES \, �$ ~D$ \ 1 PARKING BOTH SIDES NO PARKING (PRIVATE) 4" RourD D" cuee d" ROLLED 4" ROLLED 0' CURB CURB CURB 6"CURB CURB (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) r. ..� \ SECTION F -F SECTION G -G SECTION H -H 4 r � PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS R/W R/w 2' 11 I 50'54' I 42' 8' 4' 42' I 8.1 1 S MI I 1 2 ~ I oz z1 I cu K e R 6" CURB & GI/TIER' 8' SIDEWALK \-6" CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED 8" SIDEWALK -8" FOE ALK SECTION L -L PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) 50' 150' 35' 4' 45' M DIA I Mon m- 3 CURB -6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER - SECTION )I EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD (PUBLIC) r�PROPOSED w R/W RWROl4Yfd7S RW iib' I 5o' 60, 8' 1 1 8' 35' 4' 63 �1 3' M DIA, 1 _ _ MP% 201 2.0% 2'1 nmm CUR6 L PROPOSED 6" CURB & GUTTER RETAINING WALL 6 CURB & CUTTER 8' SIDEWALK 5' SIDEWALK SECTION M -M PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) 14" 35' MEgIAN 1/ 6" CDR:; URB fi CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 3' SIDEWALK SECTION N -N EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) PROPOSED RIPROYFIIENIS If►1 r�PROPOSED MPROWWMT9 R�106' R/W 50' 1 11 56' 156' 1 f 8' 42' 4' 1 41' 1 B'l 3' I MDII 3• LN I I Z.1 an1 2. 09, I I PROPOS! CURB L RETAININ 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER B' SIDEWALK PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK SECTION N -N PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD (PUBLIC) PRIVATE STREET PRNATF STREET TYPICAL PRIVATE DRIVE (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) AND FIRE LANE (PRIVATE) F � PROPOSED IMPROVEMEMS PEW 8 •. R/W T y 92' RI✓ 40' 40' 40' 1 52' 8' 32' 32' 8' 1 1 1 20% 201 20% mwww _ m_ WALL L 6" CURB & GDM°R 6' CURB & GU FR 6- CURB & GUTTER i 8 SIDEWALK '-EXISNNG'8" SIDEWALK 6" CURB &GUTTER SECTION 0-0 SECTION 0-0 EXISTING BREA CANYON ROAD PROPOSED BREA GANYON ROAD (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) DENSITY SUMMARY Summar I of Areas CONDO Lot No. S.F Lot No. S.F 6 7,867 30 5,127 7 5,295 31 6,674 8 4,945 32 6,329 9 4,928 33 5,346 10 5,140 34 4,408 11 4,857 35 4,235 12 4,761 36 4,227 13 7,033 37 4,230 14 4,902 38 4,232 15 4,646 39 4,462 16 4,328 40 4,652 17 4,682 41 4,715 18 7,473 42 4,924 19 6,095 43 5,159 20 5,022 44 5,347 21 5,214 45 5,297 22 5,731 46 5,683 23 5,419 47 4,169 24 7,196 48 4,808 25 4,577 49 5,911 26 5 214 50 5466 27 15 631 51 4645 28 6,414 Si 5,160 29 1 4,763 1. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 8714-002-900, 8714-002-901, 8714-002-902, 8714-002-903 AND 8714-015-901. 2 EXISTING & PROPOSED ZONING: SITE D SPECIFIC PLAN 3. EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT 4, PROPOSED LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL 5. EXISTING & PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN: SPECIFIC PLAN, SITE D. 6. ALL STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND GRADING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DIAMOND BAR STANDARDS, ORDINANCES AND APPROVED MODIFICATIONS HERETO. 7. ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD SHALL BE ACCOMMODATED ON THE FINAL DESIGN, OR THEY SHALL BE EITHER QUITCLAIMED, ABANDONED OR RELOCATED TO THE SATISFACTION OF ALL INTERESTED PARTIES. DRAINAGE AND PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS NECESSARY TO SERVE THIS PROJECT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AND WITH THE UTILITY PURVEYORS. EXISTING STORM DRAIN EASEMENTS WILL BE ABANDONED DURING THE FINAL MAP PROCEDURES. & MULTI FAMILY BUILDING TO MEET NFPA 13 STANDARDS. 9. ESTIMATED EARTHWORK QUANTITIES: 415,500 CYS. CUT, 415,500 CYS. FILL. 10. SEWER SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT. 11. PER LA COUNTY FIRM PANEL 1880 OF 2350. 12. PRIVATE WATER QUALITY BAI TO BE MAINTAINED BY H.O.A. 13. LOTS 62 & 63 ARE TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR & MAINTAINED BY THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. 14. ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG DIAMOND BAR BLVD, BREA CANYON RD AND % 680 1' I 1 I - -- -. �3 A • ` • \ , \ PASADO ON. TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. "} - o ao 86 120 Iso zoo zao zao szo sso aoo aao aao szo 560 soo 640 sao 72o Iso aoo aao aeo azo TOTAL GROSS 247,342 S.F. _ $96 \ Ps - " "� - sl ' '� 2' ps1 .+ \\ \ ` - -- EX SIGNAGE TO BE -o '•' N P \ E 5.7 A0. 15 ALL TRASH IS INDIVIDUAL PICK UP BY WASTE MANAGEMENT. TRASH PICK UP .FOR / .Q h o ^ 5-(R <cy \ \ ✓ \ wP 5 AVERAGE GROSS 5,263 S.F.' 6' _ 1 i0 BE RELOCATED ry m o o \/ _ 0 Bm"0 \ \ q00 \ o j6 MSE LOTS 2 THROUGH 5 NEEDS i0 BE LOCATED ON "B" STREET. TRASH PICK UP FOR ,/ `"' a, o m - ` p§. _ �• .� s1 9 s1 \ \ l ps1 LOT i WILL BE ALONG THE LOOP ALLEY. 6" a i.6" Y ) _ r r RIGHT -OF WAY TO 'i p /`^ • P - CF.IPER /PLA N 6" 12" 12" J TO l vlr!'T Jva -T6r�r%I ��fJJ / OW BE DEDICATED i E - \ \ \ `° ""� p p p4 \ \ CITY OF DI D BAR � • 60 � ps1 \ 1 W5' LOTS 1-5 TO BE MAPPED FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES. - o e ,� \ c 1 ,,, 165 ✓� m � \ � \ P ps1 \\ � r \ R-3' PER PLAN / o / EX, 12" ACP WATER �5 1h"�•;. • Ps1 o a �, s� 0 w - \ �; 1 65 ` \• ` pW 17 STORM DRAIN SYSTEM TO BE PRIVATE. AO y UT/L/TY AGENC/E o / e / R _, - , 26 1°1p1°6 a9% \ P L9 Ot \\ •\�♦ Ps1 °' \� g• BN•nP SCHOOL DISTRICT: POSTAL SERVICE: R=1/2" R=1/2" FL R= 112* / l � _ En BE TO BE \ �/ OW ` - ' 0 'I WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WALNUT VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT USPS _. EXISTING TREES 70 BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED PER TREE SURVEY. el • '' ^ PROPOSED MEDIA / - / P \ �. s 16p • \ ��. ,. \ ps1 P \ \ ,. \ 1 271 S. BREA CANYON ROAD 880 SOUTH LEMON AVE. 1317 SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BLVD. - = ,' 413.P. w \ 1g15 • \• 0' 5 w4[ \ \ \\ WALNUT, CA 91789 WALNUT, CA 91789 DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 • :' __�� P09 POLE ? h i '� 2 / ( ) ( ) " Ex o , t . 1` - P° 9• \ 909 595-7554 eoD 275-6777 LOT SUMMARY �o .. TO BE RELO .. 10p �QI ♦ 14$ \ \ ♦ •. 6 PROPOSED SIGNAL l MoOlFica TION AT / PPROPosED R Rw -_ y , o o �//�'- . `�s q6\\ 1 ,, \797 A�o. wP♦s1 \ cs I i\ /\ �� 60 N� N� 6r5 \ •\ \ Y 2 5P \\ I1fDEpWONE SERVICE: TRASH: SINGLE FAMILY HOMES) SEWER SERVICE: TRUNK LINES Lot No. Land Use LdB ACtBB 24DIAMOND BAR BLVD. WASTE MANAGEMENT INC. LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT &BREA CANYON RD. 1400 PHILLIPS RANCH RD. 13940 E. LIVE OAK AVE. 1955 WORKMAN MILL ROAD LOT1 MULTI -FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO 62 3.3 ^ L� /y �p GUM - - - - LOTS 2-5 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDOS 73 5.9 4' ROLLED CURB k GUTTER 6 CURB & GUI ,C^ ` s _--- / m m W / e p •`\ \1 pot 53 / 11 \ N y 1� A (O )NA, - 91766 (800) 266-7551 (562) 699-7411 _ Ex. R w � ° � \\ BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 WHITTIER, CA 90507 ED 47 NTS NTS � _ \+� \\ '�t" o 2 . \ 0 1 g \\ 800 483-5000 - _" -EX CCURB _ .3' rt 121\\ „ 8 FK \ ` ` 5 \ \ P �• LOTS 6-52 SINGLE FAMILY DETACH 5 7 --- /` ,150 - \ I \ \ 118• `' 1'R' :.. p,1 3 " ELECTRIC SERVICE: (EOR REFERENCE ONLY) (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) EX. POWER POLE '� - - / --- " P \` s \y c�R� ' �' ^' �\ Ps 0 \' 1 ae 60 \ TRASH: (FOR MULTI -FAMILY) SEWER SERVICE: (MAIN LINES) LOT 53-57 SLOPES/OPEN SPACE 5.7 70 BE RELOCATED -� ^- "'-- - i `\ `\ 1\ ?\� P q % �-( 154 °>\ o\ \ o, ♦ 5 ps1 9• / -\ \ SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. VALLEY VISTA INC. LOS ANGELES COUNTY OF PUBLIC WORKS - --� -' rR \ • q � % RE��. � ps1 w se I � 5'<y'L 800 CIENEGA AVE, 13940E LIVE OAK AVE. SEWER MAINTENANCE DISTRICT LOT 58 PRIVATE STREETS 4.0 SAN DIMAS, CA V91773 1 BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 900 FREEMONT LOT // o $0 683 BE _^ ip' Z° \ �'ro P (800) 655-4555 00) 266-7551 ALHAMB A - 1 3�8 RIGHY-OF-WAVY 680 \- ps V1 �' �\ ". 1b0 ri LOT 62 6 RAIN AGARDEN PARK/BASIN 1 0�� / (8 RA C 01 p 4 1 �FMP-4o oRM DRAIN , \\ \ ps1 11 V-6 0 31 1 a o 1 0%` Rar r GAS SERVICE: 3' BE DEDICATED r THE / I 6 V - _�! 1 CABLE N: p p / µ1EDTA FILTER LOW FLOW , _ P 11 w. 1 w 11 ' \ 1 3 _ ✓ / 3' BROW IiY OF DI MOND BAR a / NREATMEN B P � 2/ SISION 10 s1�1 ' �<`'' Ps ` , " • ` 6� 1 Psj6 o m L r' ON H. TYP SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. TIME WARNER LOT 63 PARK 0.9 GARAGE __, - � P \� �- - \ � � I I `A`•- _ / 1919 S. STATE COLLEGE BLVD. 0, DOOR / r _ \ CTURE m .. 6 \ I o \ c / rr ryq, rr 1041 E ROUTE 66 RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATED TO 0.5 / \ \ \ - pyc� \ l X106 a - s is (800) 427-220006 �I 1 \v 1 S �c r� GLENDORA, CA 91740 TOTAL THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 182 29.9 �. 2% MIN 25 �-'----- :. ;t bc ,. _. \ l \. ,_. Q � 4 • s1 3 r� r' i�� s oti+ I \\ p rr BENCH MARK - a /. 4' 1'L 1140± _ P' •F'a, I f _ I 1 rr � '<�%`• / ' oA $ - - o <t ; � ; � '. 1 "' ` ps1 Ps ` m qc -' . I I I .5 /,? ,,,,0 2 I. r. LOS ANGELES COUNTY BENCHMARK NO. G 5073 ELEVATION: 726.809 DATUM: NAVD 88, Ex. CAL BUILDINGS 2005 ADJUSTMENT / 135 _ I I o \ ' ` 1 - i 3' TOE ) P/ SCALE. 1 "=50, D EX R W /i r • - ,. r, 740 - I / 00/ �. / ✓ ! ^ 'La r DESCRIPTION: EX POWER POLE / / yC�OP 0\N /,- / / . - '- / b F ..Et• � 1 � 2 s :� ps `n ' 'yo i r DITCH, TYP • TY /NGS �i` R, ' �. z9 R o 0' CURB DETAIL AND UTILITIES PR POgED CURB F �/ p _r� Q ? J y' �l LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TAG IN EAST CURB OF DIAMOND KITS TO BE RELOCATED / / -� / ;n p0 ' �� / / ,' / � " l - I � - /� %f' G \ -- / , r; ;� _ SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDO MULTI FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO BAR BLVD. 42.7 FEET EAST OF CENTERLINE AND 95 FEET NORTH OF CENTERLINE OF PROPOSED R/W / 10 sl .: ' g0E`'� i g •O ° r (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) / / /. / h /. , > P _ _--. /.., Ps o. \ b r ,% 110.2 - 111.0 CROOKED CREEK DRIVE. / �. / _ > 12 ? PEDESTRIAN l l / � / ^ Of o1 / 0 � � ° a � , m''z 1 1 ,38 (SSWALK / ep � / / � ' r 29. g5, \ -. � � Xr 107.7 41.5' 28.0' 41.5' CURB n / �p / "� / �A' / W >22 , s / \ O / A' i _;G'. X10 �'' A� �l`\\* q', 1 N'k r.r / - , \ cuRo LEGAL DESCRIPTION ( / A 10.0' W 26' r' ' \ - /5, >o - 9' 6 AQV_. r -c _ , ' r/ v r, 32' BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 9 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO / / / ,r e a :! 2 CP 5 / / r '' - �'ss,1b'51. // , / / 90 ` , Try'v� � rrr MIN. MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, GOUTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Ypr� o\S,gA•r ^.� 5- A1�' ',%'rY�• r % ,,:.1psI/ r-> B � �/4 �/ gp,0A7b =,� vv v vL.. .�P3', , 4' r / r' .r 5.5' 317" o w I 5.5 94.5' 2 D 7 DEVELOPMENT S TANDARDS L 38.8' BROW ARK PER SITE D SPECIFIC PLAN 5 / - e 14 7.5' 75' GFRE TRUCK s / 5.5' 4 134.5' DEVELOPMENT STANDARD/LOWMEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL REQUIRED PROVIDEDTURNING RADIUS DETAIL 4 XISTING NDERGROUND 10.0' MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS 200 182 Al MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE 60% 41.9% TYPICAL �- z°• 0 , . I ro 5.5' - \I - - /> 1 , ',_-- - MINIMUM YARD SETBACKS: FRONT YARD 10 FEET 10 FEET tAr REAR YARD 15 FEET 88 FEET*OFF-STREET PARK/NG QNTS p ,v ' 0/ 75. SIDE YARD INTERIOR 10 FEET ONE 10 FEET * SIDE 5 OTHER CURB 12,2' SIDE YARD STREET 10 FEET STREET 10 FEET 5 / SIDE 5 ON OTHER 5 FEET wNEEL9'- SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED (60X70) r LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS 15% 6. 3' To STOP \� // ^^m°/ \ g0 / /' ,' ,3 00' ` / �� r OITCw TYP PRIVATE LANDSCAPED AREAS 15% OS r i 1.. - 16° r'' / s. Tr'7r1Cr l2 )r/-Jrr- / // /(w /�', VQ0�- `70 �•' ;`/ j � /� , SS II I II II1 ?.ts�. m -% �^o\ I _ � �_ �„ o /41 /_ ry ^^ti. • `r \O. ^` or r 3r \ P16 010- X8680. 0�' 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK � COMMON LANDSCAPED AREAS 4'4% 18.8' TOTAL LANDSCAPED AREAS 59% .os >r.r A10 jr160 PARKING SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED ExsnNc RESIDENT PARKING 94 2 ENCLOSED 94 ESM7 5.0' -4 I 0'5.0' 700 SPACES PER UNT) 5.0GUEST PARKING 32 (1 SPACE PER 3 185 5.REQUIRED RESIDENT SPACES) ROW PARKING SINGLE FAMILY TYPICAL STREET SECT/ONS , RE 11. 2' 19.Q' CONDO/MULTI-FAMILY. DITCH, TYR 70.0' 19.8' RESIDENT PARKING 270 1 ENCLOSED SPACE PER 270 r SERVICE RO/D AND A _> 9 - O rr r� CT No, 2{JF�{� PEDESTRIA)V ACCESS ONLY - 1 BEDROOM UNIT, 2 ENCLOSED ' l EMERGENCY INGRE55/CGRE55 _ SPACES PER UNITS WITH 2 w ggqq OR MORE BEDROOMS) � <; / � � � j � � 'rl TCH, TYP Fe 0`)" E �`L /U/ GUEST PARKING 90 (1 SPACE PER 3 "11 19 3' TOE DITCH, TYP �� \-@" `� r s REQUIRED RESIDENT SPACES) y . w ` 'k �. A �� b� til` fz' EASEM Nr AJ --- -. - I \ 1. ? / 8' EASEMENT 2' 15.0' 2' TOTAL PARKING TVP/CAL ON STREET \ I \ / y iq, 1q•p• p• OS' EASEMENT D.5• 2' 12. e' 2' RESIDENT PARKING. 364 364 PARALLEL PARK/NG / ^a-. m` / os' os' 0.5 _ 0.5' NTS. GUEST PARKING. 122 296 � 3d' LANDSCAPE SETBACK v Pv �� / EMERGENCY 90 \ \ I ' ,`' 2'1 OP 7/ ,2 111 2 1 2111 CURB INGRESS/EGRESS ` \ / i6o % / / \ pK z, 4,pi z, » DEVIATION TO SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SETBACKS REQUIRED 1�1 fd' / \ Z` 0 �4.Y SWALE SWALE Z.1 1 'Na"Y E ¢ NORTHERLY CL SOUTHERLY \ `s' �y \\ AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM) R/w BERM ° R/W R/W R/W R/W 46' R/W R RIGHT-OF-WAY TO SECTION A -A ENTRY - PORTION OF "A" STREET (PRIVATE) SECTION B -B ENTRY - PORTION OF "A" STREET (PRIVATE) 50' 50' 8' 42' 4' 35' 8' i M DI IN I 3• 2,07 2.0% 6' CURB & GUTTER CURB 6" CURB & GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK SECTION L -L EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) WALL 54R/W 54' I BTDEDICATEDPFND BAR _ ' �� ,'- / SECTION 1-1 SECTION J -J SECTION K -K 23.0' 23.0' _ 27'0' 27'0' 27'0' 27'01 I/ o. k EMERGENCY ACCESS ROAD SERVICE ACCESS ROAD PEDESTRIAWSERWaACGESS ROAD 36'LOT 55 I 14.0' 26' 14.0' I ---�-- I / ' S' _ (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) IfA' 1A' S'I A. /r\\ '4- 10 IS 1 IS I IU 4 2' - 8' -- Br - 2' ♦- ,.", i /. PKWY PKWY Y 22 .,y 2� l��RKI p0 "55 SIDEWALK SIDEW QP v\ a• 32'31.75'SIDEWALK SIDEWALK 5 , I, J w wCURB & CURB & CURB �� ¢ GUTTER GUTTER t1 TETE" FL u FL FL cQi FL GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER 4' 28' 4' 3' 28' 19' 2.875' 26' 2.875' SECTION C -C SECTION D -D NOR STREET LOCA( STREET MIN. TRAVEL MIN. MIN. TRAVEL PARKING MIN. TRAVEL MIN. 'A' STREET - LOCAL STREET 'A' STREET • LOCAL STREET (TAPER) PARKING BOTH SIDES \, �$ ~D$ \ 1 PARKING BOTH SIDES NO PARKING (PRIVATE) 4" RourD D" cuee d" ROLLED 4" ROLLED 0' CURB CURB CURB 6"CURB CURB (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) r. ..� \ SECTION F -F SECTION G -G SECTION H -H 4 r � PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS R/W R/w 2' 11 I 50'54' I 42' 8' 4' 42' I 8.1 1 S MI I 1 2 ~ I oz z1 I cu K e R 6" CURB & GI/TIER' 8' SIDEWALK \-6" CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED 8" SIDEWALK -8" FOE ALK SECTION L -L PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) 50' 150' 35' 4' 45' M DIA I Mon m- 3 CURB -6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER - SECTION )I EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD (PUBLIC) r�PROPOSED w R/W RWROl4Yfd7S RW iib' I 5o' 60, 8' 1 1 8' 35' 4' 63 �1 3' M DIA, 1 _ _ MP% 201 2.0% 2'1 nmm CUR6 L PROPOSED 6" CURB & GUTTER RETAINING WALL 6 CURB & CUTTER 8' SIDEWALK 5' SIDEWALK SECTION M -M PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) 14" 35' MEgIAN 1/ 6" CDR:; URB fi CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 3' SIDEWALK SECTION N -N EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) PROPOSED RIPROYFIIENIS If►1 r�PROPOSED MPROWWMT9 R�106' R/W 50' 1 11 56' 156' 1 f 8' 42' 4' 1 41' 1 B'l 3' I MDII 3• LN I I Z.1 an1 2. 09, I I PROPOS! CURB L RETAININ 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER B' SIDEWALK PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK SECTION N -N PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD (PUBLIC) PRIVATE STREET PRNATF STREET TYPICAL PRIVATE DRIVE (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) AND FIRE LANE (PRIVATE) F � PROPOSED IMPROVEMEMS PEW 8 •. R/W T y 92' RI✓ 40' 40' 40' 1 52' 8' 32' 32' 8' 1 1 1 20% 201 20% mwww _ m_ WALL L 6" CURB & GDM°R 6' CURB & GU FR 6- CURB & GUTTER i 8 SIDEWALK '-EXISNNG'8" SIDEWALK 6" CURB &GUTTER SECTION 0-0 SECTION 0-0 EXISTING BREA CANYON ROAD PROPOSED BREA GANYON ROAD (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) DENSITY SUMMARY NUMBER OF UNITS MULTI -FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO NUMBER AREA OF UNITS DENSITY OF UNITS (ACRES) 57 (DUTACRO 62 3.3 1&8 DENSITY SUMMARY NUMBER OF UNITS SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED (60x70) NUMBER AREA DENSITY OF UNITS (ACRES) (DUiACRO 47 57 82 DENSITY SUMMARY NUMBER OF UNITS SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDO NUMBER AREA GUEST (V3 PER UNIT) DENSITY OF UNITS (ACRES) TOTALS 47 (DU/ACRE) 73 5.9 185 124 PARKING SUMMARY - SINGLE FAMILY NUMBER OF UNITS REQUIRED PROVIDED COVERED (2 PER UNFD GUEST (V3 PER UNIT) COVERED (2 PER UNIT) GUEST' TOTALS 47 94 32 94 185 INCLUDES ON -STREET PARKING AND 2 GUEST SPACES IN DRIVEWAY PARKING SUMMARY - MULTI -FAMILY NUMBER OF UNITS REQUIRED PROVIDED COVERED (2 PER UI GUEST (1/3 PER UNIT) COVERED (Z PER UNIT) GUEST TOTALS 135 270 90 270 105 MAP DATE IDENTIFIER MIC OF APAT CWNCE i THIS IMV 07/30/13 BY: LP Ms or T"s 01 09 19 Z 13 7.2213 FIRE AND PLANNING LP DATE REVISION BY DATE Jufy 22, 2013 FEET W.O. 0 30 60 120 GROSS AREA 29.7 AC. t 0 1/2 1 2 CONTOUR INTERVAL 5' INCHES TOTAL LOTS 63 PREPARED FOR. PREPARED BY - 0 1111111111 Y--0WNER T T LEN NAIR0 'X -A Im 25 ENTERPRISE \ ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656 v11r \i (949) 349-8100 Z Q HUNSAKER 6r. ASSOCIATES a I R V I N E I N C 1 I- ENONE RING - SURVEYING !n Three Hughs IMA CA WfiV FX (999) 5810]59 PH: (949) aflY1I11R SITE PLAN I VEST/NG TENTATIVE TRACT 72295 F:\0718\Planning\CA_Project\SITE PLAN\0718P_SITE PLAN. dwg PROJECT PROF/LES (VERTICAL & HORIZONTAL SCALE: V" 60') LEGEND VIEW PROFILE #1 VIEW PROFILE #4 ----- NATURAL GROUND DESIGN GROUND 2 PROPOSED GRADING PROJECT BOUNDARY LINE TOP OF SLOPE 840 800 760 720 680 640 u�V Summar 800 Soo- 760 7s 720 720 240 280 320 MSE WALL MSE A OSED PMSE OWAL POSED RETAINING WALL HEIGHT 31 NING WALL - a� P / 1 \ 800 660 CENTERLINE 1009 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK 5,140 DW PROPOSED WATER 640 � RETOA CLUSTER UNITS XISTIN :.z � 00 h O ENHANCED PAVEMENT p 5 PROPOSED SEWER OPOSE " a 8 ST. .PLAN 3 29 PROPOSED -SD- PROPOSED STORM DRAIN .,Lr v 6.0'- 720 5' RIK RETAINING WALL/ 4-PLEX 2 FIRE HYDRANT 40 ---- PROPOSED '16-18 SUBTOTAL 61 18 182 4,924 PR Lot 10 PROPOSED pl ml ADE - lO WON,' BLVD. MSE ALL P Pad + 7082- _- ;P.d=76 46 5,683 - - 0 . xisi 47 ----- EXI ---- TING G --- - ADE -z ad=757.. ---- "A" ST. Pad 60.0* 26 0' Pa =766.0' m P PROPOSED GRADE 4645 28 6,414 PRC POSED MSE WAI LPadI Lot 49 Lot 441 GR d=711 2 > N ¢ I N I� hm p PR POSED MSE W LL _ + Lot PROW "A"S ED . - Pad= + PROP 'A' ED T. ad=774. s Lot 2 ,- Lot 4 Lot 24 ____ ____ mi0i p ---_ km -- I ROPOS 11.N D PROPOSED MSE ALL _____!ROPOSFD ACCESS OND BAR PROPOSED AC __ ESS ---- PR P ACCESS ---- SED ---- ---- - - - =727.5 --- ------- ---- ---- -------------- ' BLVD. j ------ Lot 6 -- ---- ---- E EXISTING STING o_ ARK I XISTIN ---- ---- 1 1 ---------+ _ry2 C BREA N. RD. I BREA CY . CHANNEL i _ RAIN 'PARK ,,-- RDEN BASIN P - d-7083 Lot 1 PROP Pad- L 08.6- t 1 WALL Pad=7 Lot 7.8' Pad= L 07.4' 1 ISTINC GROUNDM P OPOSE RETAIN NG WA PR L POSED GRADE r: p m 40 RO 190 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680 720 760 800 840 880 920 960 1000 1040 1080 1120 7760 1200 1240 1280 7320 1360 7400 1440 1480 1520 1560 16 u�V Summar 800 Soo- 760 7s 720 720 u�V Summar N ¢ pPad--754A"ST. PLAN TYPE # OF BLDGS. p PROPOSED F' H' LOT LINE 240 280 320 MSE WALL MSE A OSED PMSE OWAL POSED RETAINING WALL HEIGHT 31 NING WALL - a� P / 1 \ 800 660 CENTERLINE 1009 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK 5,140 DW PROPOSED WATER 640 � RETOA CLUSTER UNITS XISTIN :.z � 00 h O ENHANCED PAVEMENT p 5 PROPOSED SEWER OPOSE " a 8 ST. .PLAN 3 29 PROPOSED -SD- PROPOSED STORM DRAIN .,Lr v 6.0'- 720 5' RIK RETAINING WALL/ 4-PLEX 2 FIRE HYDRANT 40 ---- PROPOSED '16-18 SUBTOTAL 61 18 182 4,924 PR Lot 10 PROPOSED pl ml ADE - lO WON,' BLVD. MSE ALL P Pad + 7082- _- ;P.d=76 46 5,683 - - 0 . xisi 47 ----- EXI ---- TING G --- - ADE -z ad=757.. ---- "A" ST. Pad 60.0* 26 0' Pa =766.0' m P ADO R. 4645 28 6,414 Si of Lot 1 1 4,763 Lot 49 Lot 441 GR d=711 u�V Summar N ¢ pPad--754A"ST. PLAN TYPE # OF BLDGS. p PROPOSED F' H' LOT LINE 240 280 320 MSE WALL MSE A OSED PMSE OWAL POSED RETAINING WALL HEIGHT 31 NING WALL - EASEMENT LINE P / 1 \ 800 660 CENTERLINE 1009 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK 5,140 DW PROPOSED WATER 640 � 4,857 CLUSTER UNITS XISTIN :.z � 00 Iq ENHANCED PAVEMENT 750 5 PROPOSED SEWER OPOSE " a 8 ST. .PLAN 3 29 PROPOSED -SD- PROPOSED STORM DRAIN .,Lr v 6.0'- 720 5' RIK RETAINING WALL/ 4-PLEX 2 FIRE HYDRANT / , n v 'r?r1 Ll Ala. 25DDI ' 60x70 LOT V/C/N/TY MAP .. 00 \\\ AO \ PROPOSED 8' / NOTES VIEW PROFILE #2 �p _ - - NATURAL ND PROPOSED GRADING A V A SIDEWALK , Boo- 760 - 680 00 _ _ _ \ \ \ F \ TO BE RELOCATED SINGLE FA MIL Y \ 7C EX. POWER POLE 760 Tz0 680 Summar N ¢ pPad--754A"ST. PLAN TYPE # OF BLDGS. p PROPOSED F' H' 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 PMSE OWAL POSED RETAINING WALL HEIGHT 31 PLAN 1 24 24 511 P / 1 \ SEWER DRAIN LOW PLOW MP -40 MEDIA FILTER 660 47 1009 SINGLE FAMILY 5,140 / DIVERSION STRUCTURE TREATMENT BMP 640 � 4,857 CLUSTER UNITS XISTIN :.z � 00 PLAN 1 18 I� lope a / , n v 'r?r1 Ll Ala. 25DDI ' 60x70 LOT V/C/N/TY MAP .. 00 \\\ AO \ PROPOSED 8' / NOTES VIEW PROFILE #2 �p _ - - NATURAL ND PROPOSED GRADING A V A SIDEWALK , Boo- 760 - 680 00 _ _ _ \ \ \ F \ TO BE RELOCATED SINGLE FA MIL Y \ 7C EX. POWER POLE 760 Tz0 680 � i 760 V A O EX R/W b' t06 'F? ' ' Al � v A A EX, CURB &� o � ,T, o PITCH• ry /� �PROPOSED CURB �m R m 2"erNL 720 \ \\ \ \ \ PROPOSED R/W go \ \ -EXISTING 8"" SEWER \ \ ` / 0 �X, SIGNAGE TO BE RELOC9TED ,� 1R5 \�\ RL 680 •,,\ o 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680 .720 760 800. 840 880. 920 960. 1000 1040 1080 1120 \� o - �• / Ps �`' \�` Y _r ) y n \\ CONNECT 70 EX. 10" ACP WATER 8�`�p' ^ / •.:.- 90 35 / 5 \ \\ m l r�r� l Alii. 32D i EXISTING 8 SEWER R \ $ 9 VIEW PROFILE #3 PROPOSED GRADING A'\`BP V-9 )y r' BaoNATURAL PROPOSED MEDIAN p O,` &., / 15 RrN 5 \ r \ �\ dJ IYJ-J JAM, J� ✓� �J 7'0 -58 ^ w 800" 760 720 680 Summar N ¢ pPad--754A"ST. PLAN TYPE # OF BLDGS. p PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY S.F 6 DETACHED 60X70 30 PMSE OWAL POSED 5,295 31 PLAN 1 24 24 511 P "A" ST 491 SUBTOTAL 47 1009 SINGLE FAMILY 5,140 34 _-------- 11 4,857 CLUSTER UNITS XISTIN :.z � 00 PLAN 1 18 I� lope a /r --------------------------------------- 16 OPOSE " a 8 ST. .PLAN 3 29 PROPOSED 401 SUBTOTAL Pad=7 6.0'- MULTI -FAMILY UNITS 39 4,462 4-PLEX 2 8 40 ---- Lots - '16-18 SUBTOTAL 61 18 182 4,924 PR Lot 10 PROPOSED 5,159 ADE - 5,022 WON,' BLVD. 5,347 of 29 ' Pad + 7082- _- 5,731 46 5,683 - - 0 . 5,419 47 ----- EXI ---- TING G --- - ADE -z - -- ---- - WALL 5,911 26 _ a 50 m 27 15 631 -- 4645 28 6,414 Si 5,160 Lot 1 1 4,763 � i 760 V A O EX R/W b' t06 'F? ' ' Al � v A A EX, CURB &� o � ,T, o PITCH• ry /� �PROPOSED CURB �m R m 2"erNL 720 \ \\ \ \ \ PROPOSED R/W go \ \ -EXISTING 8"" SEWER \ \ ` / 0 �X, SIGNAGE TO BE RELOC9TED ,� 1R5 \�\ RL 680 •,,\ o 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680 .720 760 800. 840 880. 920 960. 1000 1040 1080 1120 \� o - �• / Ps �`' \�` Y _r ) y n \\ CONNECT 70 EX. 10" ACP WATER 8�`�p' ^ / •.:.- 90 35 / 5 \ \\ m l r�r� l Alii. 32D i EXISTING 8 SEWER R \ $ 9 VIEW PROFILE #3 PROPOSED GRADING A'\`BP V-9 )y r' BaoNATURAL PROPOSED MEDIAN p O,` &., / 15 RrN 5 \ r \ �\ dJ IYJ-J JAM, J� ✓� �J 7'0 -58 ^ w 800" 760 720 680 840 <O\ Z '. S`p1PM Y,yps1 , `�\• o> > s 3y8'\ \ Nei EX SIGNAGE TO BE = �-1 gym\ To BE RELOCATED 800 lrStl\i:l AIL- 331411y o S a �R' � 0 „+ � AA• ROti I v PROPOSED SIGNAL .QW o y ® s N • 1V• ps11 o i� cn� CONNECT TO EXISTING R" 7s6 10" s _ r 1\5 20� s. '�\ \♦ r P' 6 o �kd ". pgRpONDP 1� i 720 v W 65 - .� St IRA \ w .. ps12 . r �l (y ps1395 \ ----R \p WSMt BUILDING SUMMARY Vo 30" LANDS P s 7 .^ 9 2 P 10 g No � Summar I of Areas PLAN TYPE # OF BLDGS. # OF UNITS X OF TOTAL SINGLE FAMILY S.F 6 DETACHED 60X70 30 5,127 CLUSTER UNITS 5,295 31 PLAN 1 24 24 511 PLAN 2 23 23 491 SUBTOTAL 47 1009 SINGLE FAMILY 5,140 34 CONDOMINIUMS 11 4,857 CLUSTER UNITS 4,235 12 PLAN 1 18 18 251 PLAN 2 26 16 351 .PLAN 3 29 PROPOSED 401 SUBTOTAL Pad=7 6.0'- MULTI -FAMILY UNITS 39 4,462 4-PLEX 2 8 40 6-PLEX 9 a oe OW SUBTOTAL 61 18 OTAL # OF UNITS 182 4,924 PR POSED 43 5,159 20 5,022 "A" ST 5,347 of 29 30 45 5,297 _- 5,731 46 5,683 23 5,419 47 4,169 EXIS ING DE 4,808 25 MS WALL 5,911 26 _ a 50 5466 27 15 631 -- 4645 28 6,414 Si 5,160 29 1 4,763 GR I� hm p Lot 9 - (STING __----- -- ____ ____ --- -- ---_ --- -- Lr 04 S DI OND BAR . - - P OPOSE pa =727.5 BLVD. j Pates 25' Pa =7220* "e" ST. 1 1 PROP SED RE AINING WALL P OPOSE RETAIN NG WA PR L POSED GRADE m 840 <O\ Z '. S`p1PM Y,yps1 , `�\• o> > s 3y8'\ \ Nei EX SIGNAGE TO BE = �-1 gym\ To BE RELOCATED 800 lrStl\i:l AIL- 331411y o S a �R' � 0 „+ � AA• ROti I v PROPOSED SIGNAL .QW o y ® s N • 1V• ps11 o i� cn� CONNECT TO EXISTING R" 7s6 10" s _ r 1\5 20� s. '�\ \♦ r P' 6 o �kd ". pgRpONDP 1� i 720 v W 65 - .� St IRA \ w .. ps12 . r �l (y ps1395 \ ----R \p WSMt BUILDING SUMMARY Vo 30" LANDS P s 7 .^ 9 2 P 10 g No � Summar I of Areas PLAN TYPE # OF BLDGS. # OF UNITS X OF TOTAL SINGLE FAMILY S.F 6 DETACHED 60X70 30 5,127 CLUSTER UNITS 5,295 31 PLAN 1 24 24 511 PLAN 2 23 23 491 SUBTOTAL 47 1009 SINGLE FAMILY 5,140 34 CONDOMINIUMS 11 4,857 CLUSTER UNITS 4,235 12 PLAN 1 18 18 251 PLAN 2 26 16 351 .PLAN 3 29 29 401 SUBTOTAL 73 1001 MULTI -FAMILY UNITS 39 4,462 4-PLEX 2 8 40 6-PLEX 9 54 4,682 SUBTOTAL 61 18 OTAL # OF UNITS 182 4,924 1. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 8714-002-900, 8714-002-901, 8714-002-902, 8714-002-903 AND 8714-015-901. 2 EXISTING & PROPOSED ZONING: SITE D SPECIFIC PLAN 3. EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT 4, PROPOSED LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL 5. EXISTING & PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN: SPECIFIC PLAN, SITE D. 6. ALL STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND GRADING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DIAMOND BAR STANDARDS, ORDINANCES AND APPROVED MODIFICATIONS HERETO. 7. ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD SHALL BE ACCOMMODATED ON THE FINAL DESIGN, OR THEY SHALL BE EITHER QUITCLAIMED, ABANDONED OR RELOCATED TO THE SATISFACTION OF ALL INTERESTED PARTIES. DRAINAGE AND PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS NECESSARY TO SERVE THIS PROJECT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AND WITH THE UTILITY PURVEYORS. EXISTING STORM DRAIN EASEMENTS WILL BE ABANDONED DURING THE FINAL MAP PROCEDURES. & MULTI FAMILY BUILDING TO MEET NFPA 13 STANDARDS. 9. ESTIMATED EARTHWORK QUANTITIES: 415,500 CYS. CUT, 415,500 CYS. FILL. 10. SEWER SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT. 11. PER LA COUNTY FIRM PANEL 1880 OF 2350. 12. PRIVATE WATER QUALITY BAI TO BE MAINTAINED BY H.O.A. 13. LOTS 62 & 63 ARE TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR & MAINTAINED BY THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. 14. ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG DIAMOND BAR BLVD, BREA CANYON RD AND % 680 1' I 1 I - -- -. �3 A • ` • \ , \ PASADO ON. TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. "} - o ao 86 120 Iso zoo zao zao szo sso aoo aao aao szo 560 soo 640 sao 72o Iso aoo aao aeo azo TOTAL GROSS 247,342 S.F. _ $96 \ Ps - " "� - sl ' '� 2' ps1 .+ \\ \ ` - -- EX SIGNAGE TO BE -o '•' N P \ E 5.7 A0. 15 ALL TRASH IS INDIVIDUAL PICK UP BY WASTE MANAGEMENT. TRASH PICK UP .FOR / .Q h o ^ 5-(R <cy \ \ ✓ \ wP 5 AVERAGE GROSS 5,263 S.F.' 6' _ 1 i0 BE RELOCATED ry m o o \/ _ 0 Bm"0 \ \ q00 \ o j6 MSE LOTS 2 THROUGH 5 NEEDS i0 BE LOCATED ON "B" STREET. TRASH PICK UP FOR ,/ `"' a, o m - ` p§. _ �• .� s1 9 s1 \ \ l ps1 LOT i WILL BE ALONG THE LOOP ALLEY. 6" a i.6" Y ) _ r r RIGHT -OF WAY TO 'i p /`^ • P - CF.IPER /PLA N 6" 12" 12" J TO l vlr!'T Jva -T6r�r%I ��fJJ / OW BE DEDICATED i E - \ \ \ `° ""� p p p4 \ \ CITY OF DI D BAR � • 60 � ps1 \ 1 W5' LOTS 1-5 TO BE MAPPED FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES. - o e ,� \ c 1 ,,, 165 ✓� m � \ � \ P ps1 \\ � r \ R-3' PER PLAN / o / EX, 12" ACP WATER �5 1h"�•;. • Ps1 o a �, s� 0 w - \ �; 1 65 ` \• ` pW 17 STORM DRAIN SYSTEM TO BE PRIVATE. AO y UT/L/TY AGENC/E o / e / R _, - , 26 1°1p1°6 a9% \ P L9 Ot \\ •\�♦ Ps1 °' \� g• BN•nP SCHOOL DISTRICT: POSTAL SERVICE: R=1/2" R=1/2" FL R= 112* / l � _ En BE TO BE \ �/ OW ` - ' 0 'I WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WALNUT VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT USPS _. EXISTING TREES 70 BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED PER TREE SURVEY. el • '' ^ PROPOSED MEDIA / - / P \ �. s 16p • \ ��. ,. \ ps1 P \ \ ,. \ 1 271 S. BREA CANYON ROAD 880 SOUTH LEMON AVE. 1317 SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BLVD. - = ,' 413.P. w \ 1g15 • \• 0' 5 w4[ \ \ \\ WALNUT, CA 91789 WALNUT, CA 91789 DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 • :' __�� P09 POLE ? h i '� 2 / ( ) ( ) " Ex o , t . 1` - P° 9• \ 909 595-7554 eoD 275-6777 LOT SUMMARY �o .. TO BE RELO .. 10p �QI ♦ 14$ \ \ ♦ •. 6 PROPOSED SIGNAL l MoOlFica TION AT / PPROPosED R Rw -_ y , o o �//�'- . `�s q6\\ 1 ,, \797 A�o. wP♦s1 \ cs I i\ /\ �� 60 N� N� 6r5 \ •\ \ Y 2 5P \\ I1fDEpWONE SERVICE: TRASH: SINGLE FAMILY HOMES) SEWER SERVICE: TRUNK LINES Lot No. Land Use LdB ACtBB 24DIAMOND BAR BLVD. WASTE MANAGEMENT INC. LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT &BREA CANYON RD. 1400 PHILLIPS RANCH RD. 13940 E. LIVE OAK AVE. 1955 WORKMAN MILL ROAD LOT1 MULTI -FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO 62 3.3 ^ L� /y �p GUM - - - - LOTS 2-5 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDOS 73 5.9 4' ROLLED CURB k GUTTER 6 CURB & GUI ,C^ ` s _--- / m m W / e p •`\ \1 pot 53 / 11 \ N y 1� A (O )NA, - 91766 (800) 266-7551 (562) 699-7411 _ Ex. R w � ° � \\ BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 WHITTIER, CA 90507 ED 47 NTS NTS � _ \+� \\ '�t" o 2 . \ 0 1 g \\ 800 483-5000 - _" -EX CCURB _ .3' rt 121\\ „ 8 FK \ ` ` 5 \ \ P �• LOTS 6-52 SINGLE FAMILY DETACH 5 7 --- /` ,150 - \ I \ \ 118• `' 1'R' :.. p,1 3 " ELECTRIC SERVICE: (EOR REFERENCE ONLY) (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) EX. POWER POLE '� - - / --- " P \` s \y c�R� ' �' ^' �\ Ps 0 \' 1 ae 60 \ TRASH: (FOR MULTI -FAMILY) SEWER SERVICE: (MAIN LINES) LOT 53-57 SLOPES/OPEN SPACE 5.7 70 BE RELOCATED -� ^- "'-- - i `\ `\ 1\ ?\� P q % �-( 154 °>\ o\ \ o, ♦ 5 ps1 9• / -\ \ SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. VALLEY VISTA INC. LOS ANGELES COUNTY OF PUBLIC WORKS - --� -' rR \ • q � % RE��. � ps1 w se I � 5'<y'L 800 CIENEGA AVE, 13940E LIVE OAK AVE. SEWER MAINTENANCE DISTRICT LOT 58 PRIVATE STREETS 4.0 SAN DIMAS, CA V91773 1 BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 900 FREEMONT LOT // o $0 683 BE _^ ip' Z° \ �'ro P (800) 655-4555 00) 266-7551 ALHAMB A - 1 3�8 RIGHY-OF-WAVY 680 \- ps V1 �' �\ ". 1b0 ri LOT 62 6 RAIN AGARDEN PARK/BASIN 1 0�� / (8 RA C 01 p 4 1 �FMP-4o oRM DRAIN , \\ \ ps1 11 V-6 0 31 1 a o 1 0%` Rar r GAS SERVICE: 3' BE DEDICATED r THE / I 6 V - _�! 1 CABLE N: p p / µ1EDTA FILTER LOW FLOW , _ P 11 w. 1 w 11 ' \ 1 3 _ ✓ / 3' BROW IiY OF DI MOND BAR a / NREATMEN B P � 2/ SISION 10 s1�1 ' �<`'' Ps ` , " • ` 6� 1 Psj6 o m L r' ON H. TYP SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. TIME WARNER LOT 63 PARK 0.9 GARAGE __, - � P \� �- - \ � � I I `A`•- _ / 1919 S. STATE COLLEGE BLVD. 0, DOOR / r _ \ CTURE m .. 6 \ I o \ c / rr ryq, rr 1041 E ROUTE 66 RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATED TO 0.5 / \ \ \ - pyc� \ l X106 a - s is (800) 427-220006 �I 1 \v 1 S �c r� GLENDORA, CA 91740 TOTAL THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 182 29.9 �. 2% MIN 25 �-'----- :. ;t bc ,. _. \ l \. ,_. Q � 4 • s1 3 r� r' i�� s oti+ I \\ p rr BENCH MARK - a /. 4' 1'L 1140± _ P' •F'a, I f _ I 1 rr � '<�%`• / ' oA $ - - o <t ; � ; � '. 1 "' ` ps1 Ps ` m qc -' . I I I .5 /,? ,,,,0 2 I. r. LOS ANGELES COUNTY BENCHMARK NO. G 5073 ELEVATION: 726.809 DATUM: NAVD 88, Ex. CAL BUILDINGS 2005 ADJUSTMENT / 135 _ I I o \ ' ` 1 - i 3' TOE ) P/ SCALE. 1 "=50, D EX R W /i r • - ,. r, 740 - I / 00/ �. / ✓ ! ^ 'La r DESCRIPTION: EX POWER POLE / / yC�OP 0\N /,- / / . - '- / b F ..Et• � 1 � 2 s :� ps `n ' 'yo i r DITCH, TYP • TY /NGS �i` R, ' �. z9 R o 0' CURB DETAIL AND UTILITIES PR POgED CURB F �/ p _r� Q ? J y' �l LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TAG IN EAST CURB OF DIAMOND KITS TO BE RELOCATED / / -� / ;n p0 ' �� / / ,' / � " l - I � - /� %f' G \ -- / , r; ;� _ SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDO MULTI FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO BAR BLVD. 42.7 FEET EAST OF CENTERLINE AND 95 FEET NORTH OF CENTERLINE OF PROPOSED R/W / 10 sl .: ' g0E`'� i g •O ° r (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) / / /. / h /. , > P _ _--. /.., Ps o. \ b r ,% 110.2 - 111.0 CROOKED CREEK DRIVE. / �. / _ > 12 ? PEDESTRIAN l l / � / ^ Of o1 / 0 � � ° a � , m''z 1 1 ,38 (SSWALK / ep � / / � ' r 29. g5, \ -. � � Xr 107.7 41.5' 28.0' 41.5' CURB n / �p / "� / �A' / W >22 , s / \ O / A' i _;G'. X10 �'' A� �l`\\* q', 1 N'k r.r / - , \ cuRo LEGAL DESCRIPTION ( / A 10.0' W 26' r' ' \ - /5, >o - 9' 6 AQV_. r -c _ , ' r/ v r, 32' BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 9 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO / / / ,r e a :! 2 CP 5 / / r '' - �'ss,1b'51. // , / / 90 ` , Try'v� � rrr MIN. MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, GOUTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Ypr� o\S,gA•r ^.� 5- A1�' ',%'rY�• r % ,,:.1psI/ r-> B � �/4 �/ gp,0A7b =,� vv v vL.. .�P3', , 4' r / r' .r 5.5' 317" o w I 5.5 94.5' 2 D 7 DEVELOPMENT S TANDARDS L 38.8' BROW ARK PER SITE D SPECIFIC PLAN 5 / - e 14 7.5' 75' GFRE TRUCK s / 5.5' 4 134.5' DEVELOPMENT STANDARD/LOWMEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL REQUIRED PROVIDEDTURNING RADIUS DETAIL 4 XISTING NDERGROUND 10.0' MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS 200 182 Al MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE 60% 41.9% TYPICAL �- z°• 0 , . I ro 5.5' - \I - - /> 1 , ',_-- - MINIMUM YARD SETBACKS: FRONT YARD 10 FEET 10 FEET tAr REAR YARD 15 FEET 88 FEET*OFF-STREET PARK/NG QNTS p ,v ' 0/ 75. SIDE YARD INTERIOR 10 FEET ONE 10 FEET * SIDE 5 OTHER CURB 12,2' SIDE YARD STREET 10 FEET STREET 10 FEET 5 / SIDE 5 ON OTHER 5 FEET wNEEL9'- SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED (60X70) r LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS 15% 6. 3' To STOP \� // ^^m°/ \ g0 / /' ,' ,3 00' ` / �� r OITCw TYP PRIVATE LANDSCAPED AREAS 15% OS r i 1.. - 16° r'' / s. Tr'7r1Cr l2 )r/-Jrr- / // /(w /�', VQ0�- `70 �•' ;`/ j � /� , SS II I II II1 ?.ts�. m -% �^o\ I _ � �_ �„ o /41 /_ ry ^^ti. • `r \O. ^` or r 3r \ P16 010- X8680. 0�' 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK � COMMON LANDSCAPED AREAS 4'4% 18.8' TOTAL LANDSCAPED AREAS 59% .os >r.r A10 jr160 PARKING SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED ExsnNc RESIDENT PARKING 94 2 ENCLOSED 94 ESM7 5.0' -4 I 0'5.0' 700 SPACES PER UNT) 5.0GUEST PARKING 32 (1 SPACE PER 3 185 5.REQUIRED RESIDENT SPACES) ROW PARKING SINGLE FAMILY TYPICAL STREET SECT/ONS , RE 11. 2' 19.Q' CONDO/MULTI-FAMILY. DITCH, TYR 70.0' 19.8' RESIDENT PARKING 270 1 ENCLOSED SPACE PER 270 r SERVICE RO/D AND A _> 9 - O rr r� CT No, 2{JF�{� PEDESTRIA)V ACCESS ONLY - 1 BEDROOM UNIT, 2 ENCLOSED ' l EMERGENCY INGRE55/CGRE55 _ SPACES PER UNITS WITH 2 w ggqq OR MORE BEDROOMS) � <; / � � � j � � 'rl TCH, TYP Fe 0`)" E �`L /U/ GUEST PARKING 90 (1 SPACE PER 3 "11 19 3' TOE DITCH, TYP �� \-@" `� r s REQUIRED RESIDENT SPACES) y . w ` 'k �. A �� b� til` fz' EASEM Nr AJ --- -. - I \ 1. ? / 8' EASEMENT 2' 15.0' 2' TOTAL PARKING TVP/CAL ON STREET \ I \ / y iq, 1q•p• p• OS' EASEMENT D.5• 2' 12. e' 2' RESIDENT PARKING. 364 364 PARALLEL PARK/NG / ^a-. m` / os' os' 0.5 _ 0.5' NTS. GUEST PARKING. 122 296 � 3d' LANDSCAPE SETBACK v Pv �� / EMERGENCY 90 \ \ I ' ,`' 2'1 OP 7/ ,2 111 2 1 2111 CURB INGRESS/EGRESS ` \ / i6o % / / \ pK z, 4,pi z, » DEVIATION TO SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SETBACKS REQUIRED 1�1 fd' / \ Z` 0 �4.Y SWALE SWALE Z.1 1 'Na"Y E ¢ NORTHERLY CL SOUTHERLY \ `s' �y \\ AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM) R/w BERM ° R/W R/W R/W R/W 46' R/W R RIGHT-OF-WAY TO SECTION A -A ENTRY - PORTION OF "A" STREET (PRIVATE) SECTION B -B ENTRY - PORTION OF "A" STREET (PRIVATE) 50' 50' 8' 42' 4' 35' 8' i M DI IN I 3• 2,07 2.0% 6' CURB & GUTTER CURB 6" CURB & GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK SECTION L -L EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) WALL 54R/W 54' I BTDEDICATEDPFND BAR _ ' �� ,'- / SECTION 1-1 SECTION J -J SECTION K -K 23.0' 23.0' _ 27'0' 27'0' 27'0' 27'01 I/ o. k EMERGENCY ACCESS ROAD SERVICE ACCESS ROAD PEDESTRIAWSERWaACGESS ROAD 36'LOT 55 I 14.0' 26' 14.0' I ---�-- I / ' S' _ (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) IfA' 1A' S'I A. /r\\ '4- 10 IS 1 IS I IU 4 2' - 8' -- Br - 2' ♦- ,.", i /. PKWY PKWY Y 22 .,y 2� l��RKI p0 "55 SIDEWALK SIDEW QP v\ a• 32'31.75'SIDEWALK SIDEWALK 5 , I, J w wCURB & CURB & CURB �� ¢ GUTTER GUTTER t1 TETE" FL u FL FL cQi FL GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER 4' 28' 4' 3' 28' 19' 2.875' 26' 2.875' SECTION C -C SECTION D -D NOR STREET LOCA( STREET MIN. TRAVEL MIN. MIN. TRAVEL PARKING MIN. TRAVEL MIN. 'A' STREET - LOCAL STREET 'A' STREET • LOCAL STREET (TAPER) PARKING BOTH SIDES \, �$ ~D$ \ 1 PARKING BOTH SIDES NO PARKING (PRIVATE) 4" RourD D" cuee d" ROLLED 4" ROLLED 0' CURB CURB CURB 6"CURB CURB (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) r. ..� \ SECTION F -F SECTION G -G SECTION H -H 4 r � PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS R/W R/w 2' 11 I 50'54' I 42' 8' 4' 42' I 8.1 1 S MI I 1 2 ~ I oz z1 I cu K e R 6" CURB & GI/TIER' 8' SIDEWALK \-6" CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED 8" SIDEWALK -8" FOE ALK SECTION L -L PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) 50' 150' 35' 4' 45' M DIA I Mon m- 3 CURB -6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER - SECTION )I EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD (PUBLIC) r�PROPOSED w R/W RWROl4Yfd7S RW iib' I 5o' 60, 8' 1 1 8' 35' 4' 63 �1 3' M DIA, 1 _ _ MP% 201 2.0% 2'1 nmm CUR6 L PROPOSED 6" CURB & GUTTER RETAINING WALL 6 CURB & CUTTER 8' SIDEWALK 5' SIDEWALK SECTION M -M PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) 14" 35' MEgIAN 1/ 6" CDR:; URB fi CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 3' SIDEWALK SECTION N -N EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) PROPOSED RIPROYFIIENIS If►1 r�PROPOSED MPROWWMT9 R�106' R/W 50' 1 11 56' 156' 1 f 8' 42' 4' 1 41' 1 B'l 3' I MDII 3• LN I I Z.1 an1 2. 09, I I PROPOS! CURB L RETAININ 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER B' SIDEWALK PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK SECTION N -N PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD (PUBLIC) PRIVATE STREET PRNATF STREET TYPICAL PRIVATE DRIVE (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) AND FIRE LANE (PRIVATE) F � PROPOSED IMPROVEMEMS PEW 8 •. R/W T y 92' RI✓ 40' 40' 40' 1 52' 8' 32' 32' 8' 1 1 1 20% 201 20% mwww _ m_ WALL L 6" CURB & GDM°R 6' CURB & GU FR 6- CURB & GUTTER i 8 SIDEWALK '-EXISNNG'8" SIDEWALK 6" CURB &GUTTER SECTION 0-0 SECTION 0-0 EXISTING BREA CANYON ROAD PROPOSED BREA GANYON ROAD (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) DENSITY SUMMARY Summar I of Areas CONDO Lot No. S.F Lot No. S.F 6 7,867 30 5,127 7 5,295 31 6,674 8 4,945 32 6,329 9 4,928 33 5,346 10 5,140 34 4,408 11 4,857 35 4,235 12 4,761 36 4,227 13 7,033 37 4,230 14 4,902 38 4,232 15 4,646 39 4,462 16 4,328 40 4,652 17 4,682 41 4,715 18 7,473 42 4,924 19 6,095 43 5,159 20 5,022 44 5,347 21 5,214 45 5,297 22 5,731 46 5,683 23 5,419 47 4,169 24 7,196 48 4,808 25 4,577 49 5,911 26 5 214 50 5466 27 15 631 51 4645 28 6,414 Si 5,160 29 1 4,763 1. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 8714-002-900, 8714-002-901, 8714-002-902, 8714-002-903 AND 8714-015-901. 2 EXISTING & PROPOSED ZONING: SITE D SPECIFIC PLAN 3. EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT 4, PROPOSED LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL 5. EXISTING & PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN: SPECIFIC PLAN, SITE D. 6. ALL STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND GRADING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DIAMOND BAR STANDARDS, ORDINANCES AND APPROVED MODIFICATIONS HERETO. 7. ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD SHALL BE ACCOMMODATED ON THE FINAL DESIGN, OR THEY SHALL BE EITHER QUITCLAIMED, ABANDONED OR RELOCATED TO THE SATISFACTION OF ALL INTERESTED PARTIES. DRAINAGE AND PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS NECESSARY TO SERVE THIS PROJECT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AND WITH THE UTILITY PURVEYORS. EXISTING STORM DRAIN EASEMENTS WILL BE ABANDONED DURING THE FINAL MAP PROCEDURES. & MULTI FAMILY BUILDING TO MEET NFPA 13 STANDARDS. 9. ESTIMATED EARTHWORK QUANTITIES: 415,500 CYS. CUT, 415,500 CYS. FILL. 10. SEWER SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT. 11. PER LA COUNTY FIRM PANEL 1880 OF 2350. 12. PRIVATE WATER QUALITY BAI TO BE MAINTAINED BY H.O.A. 13. LOTS 62 & 63 ARE TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR & MAINTAINED BY THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. 14. ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG DIAMOND BAR BLVD, BREA CANYON RD AND % 680 1' I 1 I - -- -. �3 A • ` • \ , \ PASADO ON. TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. "} - o ao 86 120 Iso zoo zao zao szo sso aoo aao aao szo 560 soo 640 sao 72o Iso aoo aao aeo azo TOTAL GROSS 247,342 S.F. _ $96 \ Ps - " "� - sl ' '� 2' ps1 .+ \\ \ ` - -- EX SIGNAGE TO BE -o '•' N P \ E 5.7 A0. 15 ALL TRASH IS INDIVIDUAL PICK UP BY WASTE MANAGEMENT. TRASH PICK UP .FOR / .Q h o ^ 5-(R <cy \ \ ✓ \ wP 5 AVERAGE GROSS 5,263 S.F.' 6' _ 1 i0 BE RELOCATED ry m o o \/ _ 0 Bm"0 \ \ q00 \ o j6 MSE LOTS 2 THROUGH 5 NEEDS i0 BE LOCATED ON "B" STREET. TRASH PICK UP FOR ,/ `"' a, o m - ` p§. _ �• .� s1 9 s1 \ \ l ps1 LOT i WILL BE ALONG THE LOOP ALLEY. 6" a i.6" Y ) _ r r RIGHT -OF WAY TO 'i p /`^ • P - CF.IPER /PLA N 6" 12" 12" J TO l vlr!'T Jva -T6r�r%I ��fJJ / OW BE DEDICATED i E - \ \ \ `° ""� p p p4 \ \ CITY OF DI D BAR � • 60 � ps1 \ 1 W5' LOTS 1-5 TO BE MAPPED FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES. - o e ,� \ c 1 ,,, 165 ✓� m � \ � \ P ps1 \\ � r \ R-3' PER PLAN / o / EX, 12" ACP WATER �5 1h"�•;. • Ps1 o a �, s� 0 w - \ �; 1 65 ` \• ` pW 17 STORM DRAIN SYSTEM TO BE PRIVATE. AO y UT/L/TY AGENC/E o / e / R _, - , 26 1°1p1°6 a9% \ P L9 Ot \\ •\�♦ Ps1 °' \� g• BN•nP SCHOOL DISTRICT: POSTAL SERVICE: R=1/2" R=1/2" FL R= 112* / l � _ En BE TO BE \ �/ OW ` - ' 0 'I WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WALNUT VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT USPS _. EXISTING TREES 70 BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED PER TREE SURVEY. el • '' ^ PROPOSED MEDIA / - / P \ �. s 16p • \ ��. ,. \ ps1 P \ \ ,. \ 1 271 S. BREA CANYON ROAD 880 SOUTH LEMON AVE. 1317 SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BLVD. - = ,' 413.P. w \ 1g15 • \• 0' 5 w4[ \ \ \\ WALNUT, CA 91789 WALNUT, CA 91789 DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 • :' __�� P09 POLE ? h i '� 2 / ( ) ( ) " Ex o , t . 1` - P° 9• \ 909 595-7554 eoD 275-6777 LOT SUMMARY �o .. TO BE RELO .. 10p �QI ♦ 14$ \ \ ♦ •. 6 PROPOSED SIGNAL l MoOlFica TION AT / PPROPosED R Rw -_ y , o o �//�'- . `�s q6\\ 1 ,, \797 A�o. wP♦s1 \ cs I i\ /\ �� 60 N� N� 6r5 \ •\ \ Y 2 5P \\ I1fDEpWONE SERVICE: TRASH: SINGLE FAMILY HOMES) SEWER SERVICE: TRUNK LINES Lot No. Land Use LdB ACtBB 24DIAMOND BAR BLVD. WASTE MANAGEMENT INC. LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT &BREA CANYON RD. 1400 PHILLIPS RANCH RD. 13940 E. LIVE OAK AVE. 1955 WORKMAN MILL ROAD LOT1 MULTI -FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO 62 3.3 ^ L� /y �p GUM - - - - LOTS 2-5 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDOS 73 5.9 4' ROLLED CURB k GUTTER 6 CURB & GUI ,C^ ` s _--- / m m W / e p •`\ \1 pot 53 / 11 \ N y 1� A (O )NA, - 91766 (800) 266-7551 (562) 699-7411 _ Ex. R w � ° � \\ BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 WHITTIER, CA 90507 ED 47 NTS NTS � _ \+� \\ '�t" o 2 . \ 0 1 g \\ 800 483-5000 - _" -EX CCURB _ .3' rt 121\\ „ 8 FK \ ` ` 5 \ \ P �• LOTS 6-52 SINGLE FAMILY DETACH 5 7 --- /` ,150 - \ I \ \ 118• `' 1'R' :.. p,1 3 " ELECTRIC SERVICE: (EOR REFERENCE ONLY) (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) EX. POWER POLE '� - - / --- " P \` s \y c�R� ' �' ^' �\ Ps 0 \' 1 ae 60 \ TRASH: (FOR MULTI -FAMILY) SEWER SERVICE: (MAIN LINES) LOT 53-57 SLOPES/OPEN SPACE 5.7 70 BE RELOCATED -� ^- "'-- - i `\ `\ 1\ ?\� P q % �-( 154 °>\ o\ \ o, ♦ 5 ps1 9• / -\ \ SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. VALLEY VISTA INC. LOS ANGELES COUNTY OF PUBLIC WORKS - --� -' rR \ • q � % RE��. � ps1 w se I � 5'<y'L 800 CIENEGA AVE, 13940E LIVE OAK AVE. SEWER MAINTENANCE DISTRICT LOT 58 PRIVATE STREETS 4.0 SAN DIMAS, CA V91773 1 BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 900 FREEMONT LOT // o $0 683 BE _^ ip' Z° \ �'ro P (800) 655-4555 00) 266-7551 ALHAMB A - 1 3�8 RIGHY-OF-WAVY 680 \- ps V1 �' �\ ". 1b0 ri LOT 62 6 RAIN AGARDEN PARK/BASIN 1 0�� / (8 RA C 01 p 4 1 �FMP-4o oRM DRAIN , \\ \ ps1 11 V-6 0 31 1 a o 1 0%` Rar r GAS SERVICE: 3' BE DEDICATED r THE / I 6 V - _�! 1 CABLE N: p p / µ1EDTA FILTER LOW FLOW , _ P 11 w. 1 w 11 ' \ 1 3 _ ✓ / 3' BROW IiY OF DI MOND BAR a / NREATMEN B P � 2/ SISION 10 s1�1 ' �<`'' Ps ` , " • ` 6� 1 Psj6 o m L r' ON H. TYP SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. TIME WARNER LOT 63 PARK 0.9 GARAGE __, - � P \� �- - \ � � I I `A`•- _ / 1919 S. STATE COLLEGE BLVD. 0, DOOR / r _ \ CTURE m .. 6 \ I o \ c / rr ryq, rr 1041 E ROUTE 66 RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATED TO 0.5 / \ \ \ - pyc� \ l X106 a - s is (800) 427-220006 �I 1 \v 1 S �c r� GLENDORA, CA 91740 TOTAL THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 182 29.9 �. 2% MIN 25 �-'----- :. ;t bc ,. _. \ l \. ,_. Q � 4 • s1 3 r� r' i�� s oti+ I \\ p rr BENCH MARK - a /. 4' 1'L 1140± _ P' •F'a, I f _ I 1 rr � '<�%`• / ' oA $ - - o <t ; � ; � '. 1 "' ` ps1 Ps ` m qc -' . I I I .5 /,? ,,,,0 2 I. r. LOS ANGELES COUNTY BENCHMARK NO. G 5073 ELEVATION: 726.809 DATUM: NAVD 88, Ex. CAL BUILDINGS 2005 ADJUSTMENT / 135 _ I I o \ ' ` 1 - i 3' TOE ) P/ SCALE. 1 "=50, D EX R W /i r • - ,. r, 740 - I / 00/ �. / ✓ ! ^ 'La r DESCRIPTION: EX POWER POLE / / yC�OP 0\N /,- / / . - '- / b F ..Et• � 1 � 2 s :� ps `n ' 'yo i r DITCH, TYP • TY /NGS �i` R, ' �. z9 R o 0' CURB DETAIL AND UTILITIES PR POgED CURB F �/ p _r� Q ? J y' �l LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TAG IN EAST CURB OF DIAMOND KITS TO BE RELOCATED / / -� / ;n p0 ' �� / / ,' / � " l - I � - /� %f' G \ -- / , r; ;� _ SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDO MULTI FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO BAR BLVD. 42.7 FEET EAST OF CENTERLINE AND 95 FEET NORTH OF CENTERLINE OF PROPOSED R/W / 10 sl .: ' g0E`'� i g •O ° r (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) / / /. / h /. , > P _ _--. /.., Ps o. \ b r ,% 110.2 - 111.0 CROOKED CREEK DRIVE. / �. / _ > 12 ? PEDESTRIAN l l / � / ^ Of o1 / 0 � � ° a � , m''z 1 1 ,38 (SSWALK / ep � / / � ' r 29. g5, \ -. � � Xr 107.7 41.5' 28.0' 41.5' CURB n / �p / "� / �A' / W >22 , s / \ O / A' i _;G'. X10 �'' A� �l`\\* q', 1 N'k r.r / - , \ cuRo LEGAL DESCRIPTION ( / A 10.0' W 26' r' ' \ - /5, >o - 9' 6 AQV_. r -c _ , ' r/ v r, 32' BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 9 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO / / / ,r e a :! 2 CP 5 / / r '' - �'ss,1b'51. // , / / 90 ` , Try'v� � rrr MIN. MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, GOUTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Ypr� o\S,gA•r ^.� 5- A1�' ',%'rY�• r % ,,:.1psI/ r-> B � �/4 �/ gp,0A7b =,� vv v vL.. .�P3', , 4' r / r' .r 5.5' 317" o w I 5.5 94.5' 2 D 7 DEVELOPMENT S TANDARDS L 38.8' BROW ARK PER SITE D SPECIFIC PLAN 5 / - e 14 7.5' 75' GFRE TRUCK s / 5.5' 4 134.5' DEVELOPMENT STANDARD/LOWMEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL REQUIRED PROVIDEDTURNING RADIUS DETAIL 4 XISTING NDERGROUND 10.0' MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS 200 182 Al MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE 60% 41.9% TYPICAL �- z°• 0 , . I ro 5.5' - \I - - /> 1 , ',_-- - MINIMUM YARD SETBACKS: FRONT YARD 10 FEET 10 FEET tAr REAR YARD 15 FEET 88 FEET*OFF-STREET PARK/NG QNTS p ,v ' 0/ 75. SIDE YARD INTERIOR 10 FEET ONE 10 FEET * SIDE 5 OTHER CURB 12,2' SIDE YARD STREET 10 FEET STREET 10 FEET 5 / SIDE 5 ON OTHER 5 FEET wNEEL9'- SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED (60X70) r LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS 15% 6. 3' To STOP \� // ^^m°/ \ g0 / /' ,' ,3 00' ` / �� r OITCw TYP PRIVATE LANDSCAPED AREAS 15% OS r i 1.. - 16° r'' / s. Tr'7r1Cr l2 )r/-Jrr- / // /(w /�', VQ0�- `70 �•' ;`/ j � /� , SS II I II II1 ?.ts�. m -% �^o\ I _ � �_ �„ o /41 /_ ry ^^ti. • `r \O. ^` or r 3r \ P16 010- X8680. 0�' 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK � COMMON LANDSCAPED AREAS 4'4% 18.8' TOTAL LANDSCAPED AREAS 59% .os >r.r A10 jr160 PARKING SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED ExsnNc RESIDENT PARKING 94 2 ENCLOSED 94 ESM7 5.0' -4 I 0'5.0' 700 SPACES PER UNT) 5.0GUEST PARKING 32 (1 SPACE PER 3 185 5.REQUIRED RESIDENT SPACES) ROW PARKING SINGLE FAMILY TYPICAL STREET SECT/ONS , RE 11. 2' 19.Q' CONDO/MULTI-FAMILY. DITCH, TYR 70.0' 19.8' RESIDENT PARKING 270 1 ENCLOSED SPACE PER 270 r SERVICE RO/D AND A _> 9 - O rr r� CT No, 2{JF�{� PEDESTRIA)V ACCESS ONLY - 1 BEDROOM UNIT, 2 ENCLOSED ' l EMERGENCY INGRE55/CGRE55 _ SPACES PER UNITS WITH 2 w ggqq OR MORE BEDROOMS) � <; / � � � j � � 'rl TCH, TYP Fe 0`)" E �`L /U/ GUEST PARKING 90 (1 SPACE PER 3 "11 19 3' TOE DITCH, TYP �� \-@" `� r s REQUIRED RESIDENT SPACES) y . w ` 'k �. A �� b� til` fz' EASEM Nr AJ --- -. - I \ 1. ? / 8' EASEMENT 2' 15.0' 2' TOTAL PARKING TVP/CAL ON STREET \ I \ / y iq, 1q•p• p• OS' EASEMENT D.5• 2' 12. e' 2' RESIDENT PARKING. 364 364 PARALLEL PARK/NG / ^a-. m` / os' os' 0.5 _ 0.5' NTS. GUEST PARKING. 122 296 � 3d' LANDSCAPE SETBACK v Pv �� / EMERGENCY 90 \ \ I ' ,`' 2'1 OP 7/ ,2 111 2 1 2111 CURB INGRESS/EGRESS ` \ / i6o % / / \ pK z, 4,pi z, » DEVIATION TO SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SETBACKS REQUIRED 1�1 fd' / \ Z` 0 �4.Y SWALE SWALE Z.1 1 'Na"Y E ¢ NORTHERLY CL SOUTHERLY \ `s' �y \\ AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM) R/w BERM ° R/W R/W R/W R/W 46' R/W R RIGHT-OF-WAY TO SECTION A -A ENTRY - PORTION OF "A" STREET (PRIVATE) SECTION B -B ENTRY - PORTION OF "A" STREET (PRIVATE) 50' 50' 8' 42' 4' 35' 8' i M DI IN I 3• 2,07 2.0% 6' CURB & GUTTER CURB 6" CURB & GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK SECTION L -L EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) WALL 54R/W 54' I BTDEDICATEDPFND BAR _ ' �� ,'- / SECTION 1-1 SECTION J -J SECTION K -K 23.0' 23.0' _ 27'0' 27'0' 27'0' 27'01 I/ o. k EMERGENCY ACCESS ROAD SERVICE ACCESS ROAD PEDESTRIAWSERWaACGESS ROAD 36'LOT 55 I 14.0' 26' 14.0' I ---�-- I / ' S' _ (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) IfA' 1A' S'I A. /r\\ '4- 10 IS 1 IS I IU 4 2' - 8' -- Br - 2' ♦- ,.", i /. PKWY PKWY Y 22 .,y 2� l��RKI p0 "55 SIDEWALK SIDEW QP v\ a• 32'31.75'SIDEWALK SIDEWALK 5 , I, J w wCURB & CURB & CURB �� ¢ GUTTER GUTTER t1 TETE" FL u FL FL cQi FL GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER 4' 28' 4' 3' 28' 19' 2.875' 26' 2.875' SECTION C -C SECTION D -D NOR STREET LOCA( STREET MIN. TRAVEL MIN. MIN. TRAVEL PARKING MIN. TRAVEL MIN. 'A' STREET - LOCAL STREET 'A' STREET • LOCAL STREET (TAPER) PARKING BOTH SIDES \, �$ ~D$ \ 1 PARKING BOTH SIDES NO PARKING (PRIVATE) 4" RourD D" cuee d" ROLLED 4" ROLLED 0' CURB CURB CURB 6"CURB CURB (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) r. ..� \ SECTION F -F SECTION G -G SECTION H -H 4 r � PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS R/W R/w 2' 11 I 50'54' I 42' 8' 4' 42' I 8.1 1 S MI I 1 2 ~ I oz z1 I cu K e R 6" CURB & GI/TIER' 8' SIDEWALK \-6" CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED 8" SIDEWALK -8" FOE ALK SECTION L -L PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) 50' 150' 35' 4' 45' M DIA I Mon m- 3 CURB -6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER - SECTION )I EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD (PUBLIC) r�PROPOSED w R/W RWROl4Yfd7S RW iib' I 5o' 60, 8' 1 1 8' 35' 4' 63 �1 3' M DIA, 1 _ _ MP% 201 2.0% 2'1 nmm CUR6 L PROPOSED 6" CURB & GUTTER RETAINING WALL 6 CURB & CUTTER 8' SIDEWALK 5' SIDEWALK SECTION M -M PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) 14" 35' MEgIAN 1/ 6" CDR:; URB fi CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 3' SIDEWALK SECTION N -N EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) PROPOSED RIPROYFIIENIS If►1 r�PROPOSED MPROWWMT9 R�106' R/W 50' 1 11 56' 156' 1 f 8' 42' 4' 1 41' 1 B'l 3' I MDII 3• LN I I Z.1 an1 2. 09, I I PROPOS! CURB L RETAININ 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER B' SIDEWALK PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK SECTION N -N PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD (PUBLIC) PRIVATE STREET PRNATF STREET TYPICAL PRIVATE DRIVE (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) AND FIRE LANE (PRIVATE) F � PROPOSED IMPROVEMEMS PEW 8 •. R/W T y 92' RI✓ 40' 40' 40' 1 52' 8' 32' 32' 8' 1 1 1 20% 201 20% mwww _ m_ WALL L 6" CURB & GDM°R 6' CURB & GU FR 6- CURB & GUTTER i 8 SIDEWALK '-EXISNNG'8" SIDEWALK 6" CURB &GUTTER SECTION 0-0 SECTION 0-0 EXISTING BREA CANYON ROAD PROPOSED BREA GANYON ROAD (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) DENSITY SUMMARY NUMBER OF UNITS MULTI -FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO NUMBER AREA OF UNITS DENSITY OF UNITS (ACRES) 57 (DUTACRO 62 3.3 1&8 DENSITY SUMMARY NUMBER OF UNITS SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED (60x70) NUMBER AREA DENSITY OF UNITS (ACRES) (DUiACRO 47 57 82 DENSITY SUMMARY NUMBER OF UNITS SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDO NUMBER AREA GUEST (V3 PER UNIT) DENSITY OF UNITS (ACRES) TOTALS 47 (DU/ACRE) 73 5.9 185 124 PARKING SUMMARY - SINGLE FAMILY NUMBER OF UNITS REQUIRED PROVIDED COVERED (2 PER UNFD GUEST (V3 PER UNIT) COVERED (2 PER UNIT) GUEST' TOTALS 47 94 32 94 185 INCLUDES ON -STREET PARKING AND 2 GUEST SPACES IN DRIVEWAY PARKING SUMMARY - MULTI -FAMILY NUMBER OF UNITS REQUIRED PROVIDED COVERED (2 PER UI GUEST (1/3 PER UNIT) COVERED (Z PER UNIT) GUEST TOTALS 135 270 90 270 105 MAP DATE IDENTIFIER MIC OF APAT CWNCE i THIS IMV 07/30/13 BY: LP Ms or T"s 01 09 19 Z 13 7.2213 FIRE AND PLANNING LP DATE REVISION BY DATE Jufy 22, 2013 FEET W.O. 0 30 60 120 GROSS AREA 29.7 AC. t 0 1/2 1 2 CONTOUR INTERVAL 5' INCHES TOTAL LOTS 63 PREPARED FOR. PREPARED BY - 0 1111111111 Y--0WNER T T LEN NAIR0 'X -A Im 25 ENTERPRISE \ ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656 v11r \i (949) 349-8100 Z Q HUNSAKER 6r. ASSOCIATES a I R V I N E I N C 1 I- ENONE RING - SURVEYING !n Three Hughs IMA CA WfiV FX (999) 5810]59 PH: (949) aflY1I11R SITE PLAN I VEST/NG TENTATIVE TRACT 72295 F:\0718\Planning\CA_Project\SITE PLAN\0718P_SITE PLAN. dwg Agenda # g _ 2 Meeting Date: December 3, 2013 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT tN�ORP(1R�� r9S9 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council r VIA: James DeStefano, City Man ` TITLE: APPROVE FIRST READING O ORDINANCE NO. (XX)2013: AMENDING DIVISION 5 OF CHAPTER 8.12 OF THE DIAMOND BAR MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO STANDARD URBAN STORMWATER MITIGATION PLAN (SUSMP) REQUIREMENTS BY IMPOSING RAINWATER LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT (LID) STRATEGIES ON PROJECTS THAT REQUIRE BUILDING, GRADING AND ENCROACHMENT PERMITS RECOMMENDATION: Introduce and approve first reading by title only and waive full reading of Ordinance (XX)2013. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The costs for the implementation and maintenance of Best Management Practices (BMP's) associated with the provisions of the proposed ordinance for development or re- development projects will be borne by the developer/property owner. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System ("MS4") Permit (Order No. R4-2012-0175), hereinafter referred to as "Permit", was adopted by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board ("Board"), Los Angeles Region on November 8, 2012. The City is a permittee under the Permit issued by the Board, which establishes waste discharge requirements for MS4 discharges within the coastal watersheds of Los Angeles County, except discharges originating from the City of Long Beach. On October 15, 2013 Council approved an ordinance amending Division 5 of Chapter 8.12 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code which eliminated the Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan provisions and replaced them with Low Impact Development (LID) provisions pursuant to the 2012 MS4 Permit. Additional amendments are required to Division 5 of Chapter 8.12 in order to be in full compliance with the new storm water 1 permit and to provide the City with the necessary authority to enforce the new requirements. The specific changes necessary to be in compliance are as follows: a.) Section 8.12.1670 is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the provision which prohibits all non -storm water discharges through the MS4 not otherwise authorized or conditionally exempt pursuant to Part IIIA of the Permit. b.) Section 8.12.1680 is amended to add language which requires the use of control measures to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants to achieve water quality standards/receiving water limitations. c.) Section 8.12.1690 is amended to add a subsection which includes language to control the contribution of pollutants and the quality of storm water to the MS4 from discharges associated with industrial and construction activity. This provision applies to industrial and commercial sites with coverage under the MS4 permit, as well as those sites that do not have coverage under the MS4permit. d.) Section 8.12.1695 is amended to add a subsection which requires new and existing developer and redevelopment project that require structural and treatment BMP's to be properly maintained and operated as well as the requirements for maintenance records to be kept. Many of these provisions are similar to those contained and required under the previous permit. The modifications as presented in the draft ordinance attached are simply needed to expand or clarify definitions and requirements under the 2012 MS4 Permit. As a condition of the new permit, the City Attorney is required to submit a letter by December 15 to the Regional Board stating that the City has full legal authority to enforce the provisions of the new permit. In order for the City Attorney to provide the requested letter, the draft ordinance as presented to Council is required to be adopted. Staff recommends the City Council approve the first reading by title only and waive full reading of Ordinance No. (XX)2013 of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar Amending Division 5 of Chapter 8.12 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code relating to Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) Requirements by Imposing Rainwater Low Impact Development (LID) Strategies on Projects that require Building, Grading and Encroachment Permits. PREPARED BY: DATE PREPARED: Kimberly M. Young, Associate Engineer November 25, 2013 REVIEWED B David G. Liu, Director of Public Works Attachments: (A) Ordinance No. (XX) 2013, Amending Division 5 of Chapter 8.12 of the DBMC 2 ORDINANCE NO. XX(2013) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR CALIFORNIA, AMENDING DIVISION 5 OF CHAPTER 8.12 OF THE DIAMOND BAR MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO STANDARD URBAN STORM WATER MITIGATION PLAN (SUSMP) REQUIREMENTS BY IMPOSING RAINWATER LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT (LID) STRATEGIES ON PROJECTS THAT REQUIRE BUILDING, GRADING AND ENCROACHMENT PERMITS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY FINDS AND DETERMINES AS FOLLOWS: A. The federal Clean Water Act establishes Regional Water Quality Control Boards in order to prohibit the discharge of pollutants in stormwater runoff to waters of the United States. B. The City is a permittee under the permit issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region Order No. R4-2012-0175, on November 08, 2012 which establishes Waste Discharge Requirements for Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) Discharges within the Coastal Watersheds of Los Angeles County, except discharges originating from the City of Long Beach MS4. C. Order No. R4-2012-0175 ("Order") contains requirements for the City to establish a LID Ordinance in order to participate in a Watershed Management Program and/or Enhanced Watershed Management Program. D. The Regional Board has adopted Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) for pollutants which are numerical discharge limits that must be achieved effectively through LID implementation. E. The City has the authority under the California Water Code to adopt and enforce ordinances imposing conditions, restrictions and limitations with respect to activity that might degrade waters of the State. F. The City has a stormwater management program that protects water quality and water supply by employing watershed -based approaches that balance environmental and economic considerations. G. Urbanization has led to increased impervious surface areas resulting in increased water runoff and less percolation to groundwater aquifers causing the transport of pollutants to downstream receiving waters. H. As required by the Order the City is expanding the applicability of the existing LID requirements by providing stormwater and rainwater LID strategies for all projects development and redevelopment projects. 964408.1 I. This Ordinance will provide the City with the necessary authorization to enforce the new requirements under the Order. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Section 8.12.1670 shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: "All non -storm water discharges through the MS4 not otherwise authorized or conditionally exempt pursuant to Part III.A of the Municipal NPDES Permit are prohibited." Section 2: The first sentence of Section 8.12.1680 is amended to read as follows: "Owners and occupants of property within the City shall implement best management practices to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants to achieve water quality standards/receiving water limitations." Section 3: A new Subsection 8.12.1690(e) shall be added to provide as follows: "(e) Storm water runoff containing sediment, construction materials or other pollutants from construction or industrial sites or activities and any adjacent staging, storage or parking areas, shall be controlled to the maximum extent practicable whether or not the activity is covered by a NPDES Permit." Section 4: A new Subsection (f) is added Section 8.12.1695, to read as follows: "(f) All new and existing development and redevelopment projects which are required to include structural and treatment BMPs shall be properly maintained and operated to achieve the purpose for which the BMP was designed. Records shall be kept documenting that the BMP is being operated and maintained to achieve the purpose for which it was designed." Section 5: VALIDITY. If any provision of this Ordinance is found to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity shall not affect the remaining provisions of this Ordinance which provisions are declared to be severable from those found to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid. Section 6: EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and operation from and after thirty (30) days after its final passage and adoption. Section 7: The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same or a summary thereof to be published once within fifteen (15) days after this ordinance is passed and adopted, in a newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Diamond Bar and shall post a certified copy of this Ordinance, together with the vote for and against the same, in the Office of the City Clerk. 964408.1 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF 12013, BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. Mayor I, Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was duly introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the day of December, 2013 and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of , 2013, by the following vote: AYES: Council Members: NOES: Council Members: ABSENT: Council Members: ABSTAIN: Council Members: ATTEST: 964408.1 Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk Agenda No. PFA 3.1 DIAMOND BAR PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY ANNUAL MEETING DECEMBER 4, 2012 ON&PY 1. CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Tanaka called the meeting to order at 7:42 p.m. in the South Coast Air Quality Management District/Government Center Auditorium, 21865 Copley Dr., Diamond Bar, CA. ROLL CALL: Authority Members Everett, Herrera, Tye, VC/Everett, Chair/ Tanaka Staff present: James DeStefano, City Manager; David Doyle, Assistant City Manager; Michael Jenkins, City Attorney; Dianna Honeywell, Finance Director; David Liu, Public Works Director; Bob Rose, Community Services Director; Ken Desforges, IS Director; Ryan McLean, Assistant to the City Manager; Cecilia Arellano, Public Information Coordinator, and Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk. 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS: None Offered. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR: AM/Everett moved, AM/Chang seconded, to approve the Consent Calendar as presented. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: AUTHORITY MEMBERS: Chang, Herrera, Tye, VC/Everett, Chair/Tanaka NOES: AUTHORITY MEMBERS: None ABSENT: AUTHORITY MEMBERS: None 3.1 PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY MINUTES — Annual Meeting of December 6, 2011 — Approved as submitted. 3.2 APPROVED TREASURER'S STATEMENT — November 1, 2011 through October 31, 2012. 4. PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY REORGANIZATION: 4.1 Selection of Chair AM/Herrera nominated AM/Chang to serve as Chair of the Public Financing Authority. There were no other nominations offered. By acclamation, AM/Chang was proclaimed Chair of the Public Financing Authority. 4.2 Selection of Vice Chair Chair/Chang nominated C/Herrera to serve as Vice Chair of the Public Financing Authority. By Acclamation, C/Herrera was proclaimed Vice Chair of the Public Finance Authority DECEMBER 4, 2012 PAGE 2 PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY 5. AUTHORITY MEMBER COMMENTS: None ADJOURN PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY MEETING: With no further business to conduct, Chair/Chang adjourned the Public Financing Authority meeting at 7:43 p.m. back to the Regular City Council meeting. TOMMYE CRIBBINS, Authority Clerk ATTEST: LING-LING-CHANG, Chairperson AUTHORITY TO: Honorable Mayor and Mer VIA: James DeStefano, City Mt TITLE: Public Financing Authority RECOMMENDATION: Approve. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None BACKGROUND: Agenda # PFA 3 . 2 Meeting Date: December 3, 2013 of the City Council Statement for Nov 1, 2012 through Oct 31, 2013 In 2002 the City of Diamond Bar, through the Public Financing Authority, issued Variable Rate Lease Revenue Bonds in the principal amount of $13,755,000 for the purpose of building the Diamond Bar Center. On December 1, 2011 the City of Diamond Bar, through the Public Financing Authority, refinanced and converted the remaining principal amount of $11,790,000 to Fixed Rate Lease Revenue Bonds. The fixed rates range from 3.00% to 5.00% throughout the life of the bond from December 1, 2011 to June 1, 2033. As of October 31, 2013, the remaining principal amount of the bond was $11,135,000. The Public Financing Authority bank accounts which reflect the principal and interest payment activities are included in this Treasurer's Statement. Although the Public Financing Authority's funds have been incorporated into the City's monthly Treasurer's Statement, a separate Treasurer's Statement has been prepared for review and approval. This statement shows the cash balances for the various funds, with a breakdown of investment account balances and the effective yield earned from investments. PREPARED BY: Susan Full, Senior Accountant IC»V21IXT JAQO Vl Finance Director E _ Assistant City Ma' ger Attachments: Treasurer's Statement—November 1, 2012 through October 31, 2013 Diamond Bar Public Financing Authority Treasurer's Cash Statement 10/31/13 CASH WITH FISCAL AGENT: US TREASURY Money Market Account $3.20 $3.20 The Authority maintains a US Treasury Sweep Account with the City's Fiscal Agent, Union Bank of California. Any excess funds are "swept" on a daily basis from the Authority's bank accounts and are invested overnight in a pool of US Treasury Notes. Union Bank Money Mkt - Effective Yield - October 2013 0.000% All investments are placed in accordance with the City of Diamond Bar's Investment Policy. BEGINNING .ENDING BAL($1.1/01/12 '-RECEIPTS < DISBURSEMENTS TRANSFER BAI-@10/31(13 PFA - Lease Prepay Account 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 - .00PFA- PFA -Lease Payment Account 1.95 833,958.59 833,957.34 0.00 3.20 PFA - Credit Facility Account 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $1.95 $833,958.59 $833,957.34 $0.00 $3.20 CASH WITH FISCAL AGENT: US TREASURY Money Market Account $3.20 $3.20 The Authority maintains a US Treasury Sweep Account with the City's Fiscal Agent, Union Bank of California. Any excess funds are "swept" on a daily basis from the Authority's bank accounts and are invested overnight in a pool of US Treasury Notes. Union Bank Money Mkt - Effective Yield - October 2013 0.000% All investments are placed in accordance with the City of Diamond Bar's Investment Policy. AGENDA ITEMS PFA 4.1 AND 4.2 NO DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE IT liim 9a9 VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK L:2- --`� ADDRESS: 2-Iq2, LLiPHONE: 1,of) / o ORGANIZATION: -�5; t T AGENDA#/SUBJECT: I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda/subject item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. Ore This document is a public record subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act. .T tva9 VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK \ / FROM: _ X // /V" K Ss % � DATE: 0- ADDRESS: t¢s� Chia-4,41� PHONE: ORGANIZATION: AGENDA#/SUBJECT: I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda/subject item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. Signature This document is a public record subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act. VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: . CITY CLERK . �j �?�{, FROM: / 0f>r-4 /A Pj l'i>3 DATE: ------------------------------- ----- - � --- --- c �—a--�---------�ftp-t- ADDRESS:� z'C-� P 1 PHONE: 1 ORGANIZATION: AGENDA#/SUBJECT: S If /- -e-- I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda/subject item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. Signature This document is a public record subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act, VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK FROM: DATE: {� /3—Z� 13 ADDRESS: Z �2 j 5 �,h c z ✓1t PHONE:( cl ` V`AS2 q7- ORGANIZATION: AGENDA#/SUBJECT:i �z I` i X35 i - ; i G y\) I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda/subject item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. S' nature This document is a public record subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act. VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK ADDRESS: ORGANIZATION: AGENDA#/SUBJECT: N F—A-)'Z' � 5 A � F) DATE: P- �J3g� U1�5n1cNy� L ZONE: -31 o, Maj. 077 ,A C)r 01,A,MON-6 I expect to address the Council on the subject ag reflect my name and address as written above. re This document is a public record subject to disclosure under the Public Act. IL Ybd IV OU e Council Minutes sa VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK FROM: DATE: ADDRESS: c", Rpi Q S,�pf F 1a% tb PHONE: ORGANIZATION: AGENDA#/SUBJECT: \–I 01— n1flJy1z)1\JI) T3 A I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda/subject item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. cz - Si This document is a public record subject to disclosure under the Public Records Aci. VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK FROM: DATE: i,13 - ------ r-- ZL� Cep ---- - ------------t- ADDRESS: ? 3 �� PHONE: (J ORGANIZATION: ISS (� " U` k Q 6— V n AGENDA#/SUBJECT: /jot y ° U4•' e� I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda/subject item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. A Signature This document is a public record subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act. INn . t ikore L999� VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK FROM: TA c K SHAH DATE: I q 413 ADDRESS: D-"L-`ju p C .sz)iZI(- 'ty-.i s PHONE: q j� 6 cc4lfiW 5 - ORGANIZATION: s'i , Asn"s c AGENDA#/SUBJECT: I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda/subject item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. Si nature Ll This document is a public record subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act. VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK FROM: t�1 '`��" DATE: ADDRESS: ORGANIZATION: AGENDA#/SUBJECT: I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda/subject item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. L-tignature This document is a public record subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act. T �isa4 VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK j FROM: IS itai l 1 DATE: I "" I, ()r, r, iar PHONE: h`� A D ADDRESS: 4� ORGANIZATION: AGENDA#/SUBJECT: I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda/subject item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. DA—m Signature nuhlic record subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act. VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK y r FROM: 0i' i DATE: ADDRESS: �� ZS �>lSI RS ST_ PHONE: °d 9 ij V -/46$r ORGANIZATION: AGENDA#/SUBJECT: She I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda/subject item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. Sigroure This document is a public record subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act.