Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/19/2013City of Diamond Bar - City Council Agenda Tuesday, November 19, 2013 6:30 p.m. — Regular Meeting Diamond Bar City Hall Windmill Room, First Floor 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Jack Tanaka Ron Everett Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Ling -Ling Chang Carol Herrera Steve Tye Council Member Council Member Council Member City Manager James Destefano City Attorney David DeBerry City Clerk Tommye Cribbins Copies of staff reports or other written documentation relating to agenda items are on file in the Office of the City Clerk, and are available for public inspection.. If you have questions regarding an agenda item, please contact the City Clerk at (909) 839-7010 during regular business hours. In an effort to comply with the requirements of Title 11 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the City of Diamond Bar requires that any person in need of any type of special equipment, assistance or accommodation(s) in order to communicate at a City public meeting, must inform the City Clerk a minimum of 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting. Have online access? City Council Agendas are now available on the City. of Diamond Bar's web site at www.CityofDiamondBar.com Please refrain from smoking, eating or drinking in the Council Chambers. The City of Diamond Bar uses recycled paper and encourages you to do the same. ,c tom. i rv�p THIS MEETING IS BEING VIDEOTAPED FOR REBROADCAST ON THE CITY'S GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL AND WEBSITE, BY REMAINING IN THE ROOM YOU ARE GIVING YOUR PERMISSION TO BE TELEVISED. THIS MEETING WILL BE REBROADCAST EVERY SATURDAY AND SUNDAY AT 9:00 A.M. AND TUESDAYS AT 8:00 P.M. ON TIME -WARNER CABLE CHANNEL 3, VERIZON FIOS TELEVISION CHANNEL 47, AND AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING VIA ARCHIVED STREAMING VIDEO ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE WWW.DIAMONDBARCA.GOV CITY OF DIAMOND BAR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA November 19, 2013 CALL TO ORDER: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: INVOCATION: ROLL CALL: APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Next Resolution No. 2013-34 Next Ordinance No. 12(2013) 6:30 p.m. Mayor Monsignor James Loughnane, St. Denis Catholic Church Council Members Chang, Herrera, Tye, Mayor Pro Tem Everett, Mayor Tanaka Mayor 1. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATES, PROCLAMATIONS: 1.1 Presentation of City Tile to Lt. Chris Blasnek upon his transfer from the Diamond Bar/Walnut Sheriff Station to Sheriff's Headquarters. 1.2 Presentation of Certificates of Recognition to the Winners of "Through My Lens" Photo Contest 2013. 2. CITY MANAGER REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 2.1 Presentation by Mike Holmes, General Manager, Walnut Valley Water District regarding the City's Water Pressure. Written materials distributed to the City Council within 72 hours of the City Council meeting are available for public inspection immediately upon distribution in the City Clerk's Office at 21810 Copley Dr., Diamond Bar, California, during normal business hours. November 19, 2013 PAGE 2 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS: "Public Comments" is the time reserved on each regular meeting agenda to provide an opportunity for members of the public to directly address the Council on Consent Calendar items or matters of interest to the public that are not already scheduled for consideration on this agenda. Although the City Council values your comments, pursuant to the Brown Act, the Council generally cannot take any action on items not listed on the posted agenda. Please complete a Speaker's Card and give it to the City Clerk (completion of this form is voluntary). There is a five-minute maximum time limit when addressing the City Council. 4. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC COMMENT: Under the Brown Act, members of the City Council may briefly respond to public comments but no extended discussion and no action on such matters may take place. 5. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: 5.1 Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting — November 21, 2013 — 7:00 p.m., Windmill Community Room, 21810 Copley Drive. 5.2 Planning Commission Meeting — November 26, 2013 — 7:00 p.m., Windmill Community Room, 21810 Copley Drive. 5.3 Thanksgiving Holiday — City Offices will be closed November 28 - 29, 2013 in observance of the Thanksgiving Holiday. City offices will reopen on Monday, December 2, 2013 at 7:30 a.m. 5.4 City Council Meeting — December 3, 2013 — 6:30 p.m., - AQMD Government Center Auditorium, 21865 Copley Drive. 6. CONSENT CALENDAR: 6.1 City Council Minutes — Regular Meeting of November 5, 2013 — Approve as Recommended. Requested by: City Clerk 6.2 Planning Commission Minutes — Regular Meeting Minutes of October 8, 2013 — Receive and File. Requested by: Community Development Department 6.3 Ratification of Check Register - Dated October 31, 2013 through November 13, 2013 totaling $964,464.20. Requested by: Finance Department November 19, 2013 PAGE 3 6.4 Acceptance of Work Performed by Geronimo Concrete, Inc. for Construction of Pantera Dog Park ADA Improvements; Direction to the City Clerk to File the Notice of Completion and to Release the Retention Thirty -Five Days after the Recordation Date; Authorize the Expenditure of an Additional $9,500 of CDBG Funds for Change Order No. 1 with Geronimo Concrete. Recommended Action: Accept, Direct and Authorize. Requested by: Community Services Department 6.5 Award of Contract to California Surfacing for the Tennis and Basketball Court Resurfacing at Heritage, Maple Hill, Pantera and Ronald Reagan Parks in the Amount of $41,900; is a Contingency of $4,190 (10%) for a Total Authorization of $46,090. Recommended Action: Award. Requested by: Community Services Department 6.6 Appropriate $15,000 from the Air Quality Improvement Fund and Approve Contract Amendment No. 1 with Transcore for the Traffic Management System Support. Recommended Action: Appropriate and Approve. Requested by: Public Works Department 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 6:45 p.m., or as soon thereafter as matters may be heard. 7.1 Resolution No. 2013 -XX: Approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295, Associated Development Review and Tree Permit Applications and Addendum #1 to the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Site D Specific Plan (Planning Case No. PL 2013-229) to Authorize the Development of 182 Residential Units and a 2.5 Net Acre Neighborhood Public Park at the Southeasterly Corner of Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Construct 182 Residential Units and 2.5 Net Acre Neighborhood Public Park Located at the Southeast Corner of Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 (Assessor's Parcel Nos. 8714-002-900, 8714-002-901, 8714-002-902, 8714-002-903, and 8714-015-001) and Determining Associated Contemplated Depositions and Acquisitions of Property are in Conformance with the General Plan. November 19, 2013 PAGE 4 Recommended Action: Receive Staff's Report, Open the Public Hearing, Receive Testimony, Close the Public Hearing and Adopt Resolution Approving the Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295 Associated Development Review and Tree Permit Application and Addendum #1 to the Site D Specific Plan Final EIR (Planning Case No. PL2013-229), Authorizing the development of 182 for -sale dwelling units and a 2.5 net acre neighborhood public park and determining associated dispositions and acquisitions of property are in conformance with the General Plan, based on the Findings of DBMC Sections 21.20.080, 22.22.150, 22.48.040 and 22.38.110, subject to conditions of approval as listed within the Resolution. Requested by: Community Development Department 8. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: 8.1 Adopt Ordinance No. 03(C) (2013): Identifying the Temporary Re - Location of Regular Meetings of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar to Diamond Bar City Hall Located at 21810 Copley Drive and Amending Ordinance Nos. 03, 03A and 03(B)2013. Recommended Action: Adopt. Requested by: City Clerk 9. COUNCIL SUB -COMMITTEE REPORTS AND MEETING ATTENDANCE REPORTS/COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS: 10. ADJOURNMENT: Typical In -Home PR A: Your in-home pressure regulator or PR is located where the water supply pipe enters your home. The device looks like a cone with a nut on top. Water entering the PR from water mains in the street is constricted within the PR and controlled by an adjustable spring-loaded diaphragm and disc. Even if the street water main pressure fluctuates, the PR insures a functional pressure within your home, as long as the supply pressure does not drop below the PR's pre-set pressure. A: PR's are installed by the home builder in areas where street water pressure is above target pressure ranges. The Uniform Plumbing Code (2009 edition, Section 608.2) requires a PR in any building where the static water pressure in the water supply system exceeds 80 psi. Just like worn out mechanical parts, PR's sometimes malfunction or just quit working. If you have been experiencing problems associated with high water pressure such as water hammer (noisy plumbing), water leaks, appliance damage, poor t lawn sprinkler efficiency, we encourage you to have a qualified professional inspect your PR. Agenda No. 6.1 MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR NOVEMBER 5, 2013 CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Jack Tanaka called the Regular City Council meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. in the Windmill Community Room, Diamond Bar City Hall, 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Pro Tem Everett led the Pledge of Allegiance. INVOCATION: Pastor Jim Price, Diamond Canyon Christian Church, gave the invocation. ROLL CALL: Council Member Chang, Herrera, Tye, Mayor Pro Tem Everett and Mayor Tanaka. Staff Present: James DeStefano, City Manager; David Doyle, Assistant City Manager; David DeBerry, City Attorney; David Liu, Public Works Director, Bob Rose, Community Services Director; Grace Lee, Senior Planner; Kimberly Young, Associate Engineer; Sterling Mosley, Assistant Engineer; Ryan McLean, Assistant to the City Manager; Alfredo Estevez, IS Help Desk Support Technician; Cecilia Arellano, Public Information Coordinator, and Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: As Presented. 1. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATES, PROCLAMATIONS: BUSINESS OF THE MONTH: 1.1 Mayor Tanaka and Council presented a City Tile to Paul Aoun, Managing Partner of Chili's Grill and Bar, 707 Grand Avenue, as Business of the Month for November 2013; and, for being recognized as the No. 1 Chili's facility nationwide. 2. CITY MANAGER REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: CM/DeStefano reported that CM staff recently met with the County Library for its annual meeting to discuss library operations. The relationship with the new library is strong and growing on a daily basis. County Librarian Margaret Donnellan Todd reported that the new Diamond Bar Library is a "smashing" success with over 21,600 users per month, which makes the Diamond Bar Library the third busiest in the East region and the seventh busiest of the 85 libraries within the entire County of Los Angeles library system. There is an annual circulation of over 353,000 for the Diamond Bar facility. In response to a number of requests, the County is likely to incorporate a workshop, read together program, more Asian language eBooks, as well as opening the Library one hour earlier Monday through Thursday. Library contributions come from a property tax imposed by the County of Los Angeles. The tax revenue from Diamond Bar covered 98 percent of the library's cost, which makes the local facility number four with respect to cost recovery. NOVEMBER 5, 2013 PAGE 2 CITY COUNCIL 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Tim Saunders, Pomona, said he was excited to see students involved with the City Council meeting this evening. He spoke about a wall being built between Diamond Bar High School and Diamond Ranch High School. He was on the field and saw kids from Diamond Bar High School making trouble with Diamond Ranch High School players and coaches prior to the game. He felt there should be better control over this type of behavior and that the kids should get along. He asked Council for help in getting this matter resolved. Debbie Avila -Mott, Diamond Bar resident, said she was horrified with the kids' behavior at the football game. Responsible adults need to step in and make sure no kids are injured. It is very sad that Diamond Bar is so unnecessarily divided. The City Council honored her as a volunteer of the year for 2012 and was happy to represent all of Diamond Bar and not just the half in which she lives. She asked the City Council to help unite the north and south portions of the City. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC COMMENTS: M/Tanaka said he attended the football game and was appalled by the behavior of students from both schools. He hoped that the City could work with both school districts to improve relations between the two schools. C/Chang responding to Ms. Avila -Mott stated that there is an organization called the Diamond Bar Educational Community Roundtable which was created by a variety of parents who chose to come together to bridge the gap between south and north Diamond Bar so that PTA and other organizations could share best practices toward a more solidified community. M/Tanaka said that a few weeks ago the City's Public Safety Team met with the principals of every school located in the city. There was a good strong dialogue by the Sheriff's Department about school safety and traffic around each of the school sites. Perhaps the team can reach out to the students as well. 4. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: 5.1 Veterans Recognition Ceremony — November 7, 2013 — 9:00 a.m., Diamond Bar Center, 1600 Grand Avenue, Diamond Bar. 5.2 2013-2021 Housing Element Public Workshop — November 7, 2013 — 6:30 p.m., Windmill Community Room, 21810 Copley Drive. 5.3 Veterans Holiday — November 11, 2013 — City offices closed in observance of Veterans' Day. City offices reopen Tuesday, November 12, 2013 at 7:30 a.m. NOVEMBER 5, 2013 PAGE 3 CITY COUNCIL 5.4 Planning Commission Meeting — October 22, 2013 — 7:00 p.m., Windmill Community Room, 21810 Copley Drive. 5.5 Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (Castle Rock Road/Crooked Creek Drive) — November 13, 2013 — 7:00 p.m., Windmill Community Room, 21810 Copley Drive. 5.6 Traffic and Transportation Commission Meeting — November 14, 2013 — 7:00 p.m., Windmill Community Room, 21810 Copley Drive. 5.7 City Council Meeting November 14, 2013 - 6:30 p.m., Windmill Community Room, 21810 Copley Drive. 6. CONSENT CALENDAR: C/Tye moved, C/Herrera seconded, to approve the Consent Calendar as presented. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Chang, Herrera, Tye, MPT/Everett, M/Tanaka NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None 6.1 APPROVED CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — Regular Meeting of October 15, 2013 - As Submitted. 6.2 RECEIVED AND FILED PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES — Regular Meeting of August 22, 2013. 6.3 RECEIVED AND FILED TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MINUTES — Regular Meeting of September 12, 2013. 6.4 RECEIVED AND FILED PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES — Regular Meeting of September 24, 2013. 6.5 RATIFIED CHECK REGISTER — Dated October 10, 2013 through October 30, 2013 totaling $1,626,885.63. 6.6 APPROVED TREASURER'S STATEMENT for September 2013. 6.7 SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE 11 AMENDING DIVISION 5 OF CHAPTER 8.12 OF THE DIAMOND BAR MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO STANDARD URBAN STORMWATER MITIGATION PLAN (SUSMP) REQUIREMENTS BY IMPOSING RAINWATER LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT (LID) STRATEGIES ON PROJECTS THAT REQUIRE BUILDING, GRADING AND ENCROACHMENT PERMITS. NOVEMBER 5, 2013 PAGE 4 CITY COUNCIL 6.8 APPROVED CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 1 IN THE AMOUNT OF $20,000 WITH LILLEY PLANNING GROUP (LPG) TO PROVIDE ONSITE PLANNING SERVICES FOR A NOT -TO -EXCEED TOTAL COST OF $40,000. 6.9 SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 09(2013): AMENDING TITLE 15 OF THE DIAMOND BAR CODE AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE, THE 2013 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE VOLUMES 1 AND 2, INCLUDING APPENDICES C, I AND J THERETO; CHAPTER 1 DIVISION II OF THE 2013 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE AS THE ADMINISTRATIVE CODE; THE 2013 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE AND THE APPENDICES THERETO; THE 2013 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE AND THE APPENDICES THERETO; THE 2013 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE AND THE APPENDICES THERETO; THE 2013 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE INCLUDING APPENDICES G, H, J, K AND O THERETO; AND, THE CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING CODE WITHOUT THE APPENDICES THERETO, TOGETHER WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS, ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND EXCEPTIONS. 6.10 APPROVED AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY FOR STATE ROUTE 60/LEMON AVENUE PARTIAL INTERCHANGE (ON AND OFF RAMPS) CONSTRUCTION. 6.11 SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE 10(2013): AMENDING TITLE 10 BY ADDING SECTION 10.16.115 TO THE DIAMOND BAR MUNICIPAL CODE PROHIBITING PARKING OF VEHICLES ON CITY STREETS AND PUBLIC PROPERTY FOR THE PURPOSE OF SLEEPING. 6.12 (a) ADOPTED RESOLUTION 2013-32: A RESOLUTION GRANTING CONSENT AND JURISDICTION TO THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES IN THE MATTER OF COUNTY LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 10006 AND COUNTY LIGHTING DISTRICT LLA -1 IN THE DIAMOND BAR ZONE, CITY OF DIAMOND BAR — PETITION NO. 13-412 (TWELVE STREET LIGHTS ALONG THE NORTHERN SIDE OF GOLDEN SPRINGS DRIVE EAST OF BREA CANYON ROAD IN FRONT OF THE SHELL GAS STATION AND THE IN -N -OUT BURGER). (b) ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2013-33: A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE GREATER LOS ANGELES COUNTY VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 21 OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE THREE VALLEYS NOVEMBER 5, 2013 PAGE 5 CITY COUNCIL MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT — ORIGINAL AREA, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, AND THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WALNUT VALLEY WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 5, APPROVING AND ACCEPTING THE NEGOTIATED EXCHANGE OF PROPERTY TAX REVENUES, RESULTING FROM ANNEXATION OF PETITION NO.13-412 TO THE COUNTY LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 10006. 7. PUBLIC HEARING: None. 8. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: 8.1 ADOPT ORDINANCE 03(B)(2013): IDENTIFYING THE TEMPORARY RELOCATION OF REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR TO DIAMOND BAR CITY HALL LOCATED AT 21810 COPLEY DRIVE AND AMENDING ORDINANCE NOS. 03 AND 03A (2013). CC/Cribbins stated that during the City Council meeting of June 4, 2013 the City Council adopted Urgency Ordinance 03(2013) relocating the Diamond Bar City Council meetings to the Windmill Community Room at City Hall for the months of July, August and September due to the remodeling of the South Coast Air Quality Management District Auditorium. On August 20, 2013, staff recommended that the City Council adopt Urgency Ordinance 03(A) (2013) continuing the City Council meetings in the Windmill Room until November 5. The auditorium at the South Coast Air Quality Management District has essentially been completed; however, because both the AQMD and City staffs have not been able to test the signal with Time -Warner, staff feels it would be in the best interest of the City Council to hold its November 19 meeting in the Windmill Room. It is therefore recommended that the City Council adopt Urgency Ordinance 03(B) (2013) approving the City Council meeting for November 19, 2013 to be held in the Windmill Community Room and that following the City Council meeting of November 19, 2013, Ordinance No 03(B) (2013) will automatically terminate at which time the meetings will revert back to the South Coast Air Quality Management District. C/Chang moved, C/Herrera seconded, to Adopt Urgency Ordinance 03(B) (2013) as recommended. Motion carried 5-0 by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Chang, Herrera, Tye, MPT/Everett, M/Tanaka NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None NOVEMBER 5, 2013 PAGE 6 CITY COUNCIL 9. COUNCIL SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS AND MEETING ATTENDANCE REPORTS/COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS: C/Tye felt that although he feels it inappropriate to respond during public comments, he would now take a moment to state that he felt the only people more surprised than Diamond Ranch High School to receive an email advising that the 2013 Mayor's Cup had been canceled would have been staff. C/Tye stated that in his opinion Mayor Tanaka had gotten bad advice in canceling the Mayor's Cup. The City is divided by two freeways, two school districts and two zip codes and that by canceling the Mayor's Cup he felt that it had contributed to the bad feelings between the two high schools. C/Tye apologized to the kids at Diamond Bar High School who had never won the Mayor's Cup and were looking forward to winning it for the first time. C/Tye apologized to the kids at Diamond Ranch High School who never lost the Mayor's Cup and looked forward to defending it. Neither team had that chance. It is unfortunate the way the game ended but it does not excuse the action that took place earlier that week in canceling the Mayor's Cup. He then excused himself from the meeting. C/Herrera said she attended a Foothill Transit meeting last week and invited individuals who are frustrated because they cannot find parking in a Park -N -Ride at Brea Canyon Road by the Metrolink station is operational and there are 420 spaces available for individuals wanting to park their cars and take Foothill Transit into downtown Los Angeles. The beautiful facility boasts 600 spaces, 200 of which are dedicated for Metrolink riders and the other 400 for Foothill Transit. She also attended a meeting with Senator Ed Hernandez and Senator Bob Huff regarding the State's economy, water and many other pertinent issues which was very informative. C/Chang announced that as usual, people can follow her on Facebook and Twitter. She again spoke about the Diamond Bar Educational Community Roundtable which has successfully included parents from both school districts discussing best practices to bridge the divide. Anyone interested in participating can contact her. C/Chang said it had been her pleasure to serve Diamond Bar for the past four years and looked forward to tonight's outcome. MPT/Everett reported that he had participated in the Neighborhood Watch Meeting at Capen Avenue near Adel where 40 year residents met with Deputy Schellar on neighborhood watch and Disaster Recover. He also attended the Star Program and Red Ribbon week activities at Armstrong, Pantera and Quail Summit Elementary Schools. NOVEMBER 5, 2013 PAGE 7 CITY COUNCIL On October 28 he attended the opening of the science and design based learning classroom dedicated in honor of former teacher Leslie Stoltz at Chaparral Middle School. He said he was sorry about what happened at the Diamond Bar High School/Diamond Ranch High School football game. He felt that the community, staff and kids need to come together and the City needs to foster an inclusive atmosphere that could include one activity (a Mayor's Cup) or something in the way of healthy competition and recognition between the two high schools whose students participate in many sports activities. USC and UCLA who have a cross- town rivalry, through their intramural sports have a system set up by the leaders of the athletic departments who give points for various sports agreed to by the athletic directors and the principals and would like to put that on the table for discussion. MPT/Everett suggested that the schools consider something of a more comprehensive nature between the two schools. He also suggested that through discussion with the Roundtable as discussed by C/Chang we need an innovative approach to bringing both school districts together. M/Tanaka reported that he too had attended the Salute to Teachers from the Walnut Valley School District. Special congratulations to Maggie Strand who was selected as Teacher of the Year for the District. He participated in the 6th Annual Leadership Conference for the Asian Pacific Islander Association, the Neighborhood Watch Meeting on Adel Avenue, three Red Ribbon Week Assemblies Armstrong, Pantera and Quail Summit. He attended the Diamond Bar Senior's Halloween Dinner Dance, Quail Summit Elementary Carnival and Haunted House and thanked Diamond Bar High School Leo Club for their participation. He also attended the Foothill Transit meeting, the Haunted House at Heritage Park and Fall Fun Festival. He thanked civic students from CalPoly Pomona and Diamond Bar High School for attending tonight's meeting. He felt that if both schools had a better understanding of the Mayor's Cup award which should have been better planned and thought out rather than being an activity imposed by the City of Diamond Bar the outcome may have been better. He is sorry that the fight occurred just before the end of the game but felt it presented an opportunity for both school principals to come together and with the support of both superintendents plan an activity that would be positive for both schools. He felt the coaching staffs, referees and some parents that were involved needed to take responsibility for what happened and help deter similar occurrences in the future because it really gave a black eye to the City. It is not something he is proud of but felt he had the ability and leadership with the support of the Council to move forward and create something positive from this event. NOVEMBER 5. 2013 PAGE 8 CITY COUNCIL ADJOURNMENT: With no further business to conduct, M/Tanaka adjourned the City Council Meeting at 7:15 p.m. TOMMYE CRIBBINS, CITY CLERK The foregoing minutes are hereby approved this day of 2013. JACK TANAKA, MAYOR Agenda No. 6.2:' MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 8, 2013 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Torng called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. in the City Hall Windmill Room, 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Commissioner Dhingra led the Pledge of Allegiance. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Ashok Dhingra, Jimmy Lin, Jack Shah, Vice Chairman Frank Farago, Chairman Tony Torng Also present: Greg Gubman, Community Development Director; Dave DeBerry, City Attorney; Grace Lee, Senior Planner; Natalie Tobon, Assistant Planner; and Stella Marquez, Administrative Coordinator. 2. MATTERS FROM THE AUDIENCE/PUBLIC COMMENTS: Vinod Kashyap owns a property at 3839 Castle Rock Road which gets a lot of noise and shaking of the retaining walls from the freeway. In some instances people have gone off the freeway, through the fence and ended up close to his back yard. The traffic flow is very fast and there are a lot of heavy vehicles going through the area. He fears that one day someone will plow into. his house. He asked the Commission to address the safety issues in the area. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: As presented 4. CONSENT CALENDAR: 4.1 Minutes of the September 24, 2013, Regular Meeting. VC/Farago moved, C/Dhingra seconded, to approve the September 24, 2013, regular meeting minutes as presented. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: 5. OLD BUSINESS: 6. NEW BUSINESS COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: None None Dhingra, Lin, Shah, VC/ Farago, Chair/Torng _ None None OCTOBER 8, 2013 PAGE 2 PLANNING COMMISSION 7 PUBLIC HEARING(S): 7.1 Development Review No. PL2013-77 — Under the authority of Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.48, applicant Steven Phillips and property owner Mei Deng, requested Development Review approval to construct a new single- family residence consisting of 13,360 square feet of livable area; a 2,207 square foot garage, and 2,471 square feet of patio areas on a 1.21 gross acre (52,707 square foot) lot. The subject property is zoned Rural Residential (RR) with a consistent underlying General Plan land use designation of Rural Residential. PROJECT ADDRESS PROPERTY OWNER 24074 Falcons View Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Mei Deng 500-999 West Broadway Vancouver, BC VSZIKS APPLICANT: Steven Phillips 23177 La Cadena Drive #101 Laguna Hills, CA 92677 CDD/Gubman recommended that the Planning Commission continue the matter to October 22, 2013, to allow the applicant additional time to complete the public hearing notification requirements. Chair/Torng opened the public hearing. There was no one present who wished to speak on this item. C/Dhingra moved, VC/Farago seconded, to continue Development Review No. PL2013-77 to October 22, 2013. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Dhingra, Lin, Shah, VC/ Farago, Chair/Torng NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None 7.2 Development Review No. PL2013-215 — Under the authority of Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.48, applicant Dan Wainwright, representing America's Tire Co and property owner Larry Zerner, representing Diamond Bar Plaza, requested Development Review approval to construct a 7,149 square foot building for a new retail automotive parts and service establishment. The subject property is zoned Community Commercial (C-2) with an underlying General Plan land use designation of General Commercial. OCTOBER 8, 2013 PROJECT ADDRESS: PROPERTY OWNER: APPLICANT: PAGE 3 PLANNING COMMISSION 2875 S. Diamond Bar Boulevard. Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Diamond Bar Plaza 1801 Century Park East, Suite 2400 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Daniel Wainwright America's Tire Co. 20225 N. Scottsdale Rd Scottsdale, AZ 85255 AP/Tobon presented staff's report and recommended Planning Commission approval of Development Review No. PL2013-215, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. C/Shah asked what is currently on the site and AP/Tobon reiterated that the site is a vacant lot. Daniel Wainwright, America's Tire Co., 20225 N. Scottsdale Road, Scottsdale, AZ 85255, said he was before the Commission to request approval of a Development Review application for a new America's Tire station on Diamond Bar Boulevard at Cold Springs Road. He gave a brief background of the company and talked about the proposed project. America's Tire Co. has been in business for 54 years and there are currently 865 locations in 24 states with over 15,000 full time employees. America's Tire is the largest and most successful retail tire company in the United States. The company does not perform any mechanical work, there are no automotive fluids and there is no hazardous waste. The business is strictly retail sales and service of passenger car and light truck tires and wheels. All of the work is done inside of the building; all of the storage is inside of the building; and, in this case the service bays face to the north, away from the residential property. All of the work is performed within a clean, modern and efficient environment. Hours of operation are Monday through Friday from 8:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Saturday from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m."and the shops are closed on Sundays. This project will create about 10 full time new jobs for the community and those employees will receive benefits, retirement plans, medical insurance, training, etc. In the 50 years the company has been in business it has never laid off any employees. He thanked staff for their input and fine tuning to the project. He said his company agrees to all of the conditions of approval which to him are comprehensive and thorough. C/Lin asked if the headquarters was in Ann Arbor, Michigan. Mr. Wainwright responded that the company was started in Ann Arbor and there is still an office in that City. The owner decided he would like to live in warmer climate and 30 OCTOBER 8, 2013 PAGE 4 PLANNING COMMISSION years ago he and his wife moved to Scottsdale, Arizona. C/Lin asked why the company was hiring only 10 employees in Diamond Bar when the average store staffs 20 employees. Mr. Wainwright responded that 10 would be the initial employment level to get the business going.. As the store becomes established, which usually occurs within a year, more staff would be brought on as the level of business dictates. C/Dhingra said that staff and the applicant were to be congratulated on a very good project and design. He also spoke supportively of the site plan design that eliminates the shared drive aisle with the neighboring car wash. Chair/Torng opened the public hearing. Natalia Baudin, 2904 Crooked Creek, said she retired from South Coast Air Quality Management District where she worked in environmental justice. She is concerned about the proposed tire company. When there was a service station in the location, people would work on cars all night and compressors could be heard at 2:00 a.m. With the shopping center, the building noises start at 5:30 to 6:00 a.m. in the mornings and after stores open, there were large 18 -wheel transfer trucks in the neighborhood that would park along Cold Spring Lane waiting to gain access to the shopping center area, trucks which sat along the side of the fence bordering her yard and dump diesel fumes into the yard. Now there are trucks delivering to the super market with half loads that when they hit the speed bumps she is violently awakened. In addition, she has to contend with lawn service at 6:00 a.m. for the daycare. She does not mind the businesses being in her neighborhood but wishes they would realize there are people who are retired and sleep later in the morning. Her concerns about the tire store is: 1) that the noise be minimized during the building of the store by limiting the hours from 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.; include in the occupancy permit, no compressors, impact wrenches or other noise making tools be used prior to 8:00 a.m.; tire deliveries should be made by way of Diamond Bar Boulevard and not Cold Spring Lane; all tires left outside of the building should be covered; and, no parking for the business along Cold Spring Lane; 2) no underground storage of chemicals or vats larger than 50 gallons, no use of toxic chemicals that can be released into the neighborhood; and 3) she is concerned about loss of property values. Tire stores generate a lot of traffic and cars to be worked on and all cars that are being worked on should be kept in the property boundaries of the company. Mrs. Baudin said that she and her husband have worked hard to build a pleasant life in Diamond Bar and she understands that the City needs revenues. Tire stores in neighborhoods are not very pretty. She asked the Planning Commission to reconsider this project or put limitations she has stated on the occupancy permit. Vinod Kashyap said he appreciated the presentation. He asked if the tires were American made and asked if the company had a provision for vocational OCTOBER 8, 2013 PAGE 5 PLANNING COMMISSION training for kids. He wanted to know if it was a LEED design based on zero energy use. The previous speaker covered his other concerns. Mr. Wainwright responded to speakers that with respect to noise the hours of operation (as previously stated) are 8:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturday. The store is closed on Sunday. Construction hours will be complied with in accordance with the City's conditions. He will be personally involved with the project throughout the construction phase and if there are any concerns about early morning starts, he will address those and make certain everything is properly handled. With respect to chemicals, he again stated that the store does not handle any automotive fluids or any kind of hazardous waste, oil, antifreeze or brake fluid and no fluids are stored on site or used in any of the store's operations. Some of the tires are American made and many are "world source" tires. Tires are made in a number of countries and the company does not discriminate against any nation's products. The company looks very closely at the quality of the tires. Any tire that the company sells is thoroughly tested by staff. The company's poly chemist looks at the construction of every tire and works with the manufacture to make certain the tire has the proper adhesives, tread design, as well as steel and polymer ingredients to ensure that it is a safe tire. The company also wants to offer customers good value for their tire and not everyone can afford the most expensive tire so the company offers tires that are good value at all market points throughout the range of products. With respect to vocational training, the company absolutely welcomes young people. As he previously mentioned, the company has an extensive training program and loves to have young people after school that have an interest and a passion in working for a really good company that promotes from within. The company would love to partner with vocational instructors at the local high schools and community colleges to bring folks into the organization. The company has looked at the LEED design very closely. The building does not quite meet the LEED criteria. The company has tried but the nature of the use of the building makes it very difficult to create the energy envelope. However, what they have done in the design is to include a number of skylights that are screened behind the parapet walls to harvest natural sunlight. The building also uses occupancy sensors and light level sensors within the building and an extensive number_ of LED light fixtures to reduce the electrical demand. The roof is made from steel, about 90 percent of which is recycled, and the remaining components are masonry and concrete which can be recycled at the end of the useful life of the facility. This site was formerly a gas station which closed due to leaking underground storage tanks and were removed a number of years ago and significant mitigation measures were performed to bring any toxic levels of contaminant below the minimum thresholds. In fact, the report from the water quality board verified that indeed, the contamination levels are below action limits and the site case is closed. The store proposes to do a ground lease on the site for 40 to 50 years. The company makes a long-term commitment to the OCTOBER 8, 2013 PAGE 6 PLANNING COMMISSION community. The construction costs for the building will be approximately $1.5 million. America's Tire Co. plans to be a long-term positive part of the Diamond Bar community. Mr. Wainwright said that customers will be on the property for 30-45 minutes and cars are not kept offsite nor are they kept overnight. Generally, 85 percent of the product is available on site and customers can be on their way in about 30 minutes. C/Shah asked about the storage of used and new tires and if during construction the project uncovers contaminant materials how will that be handled. Mr. Wainwright responded that all of the new tires are stored within the building and all of the used tires are stored within the building and picked up by a licensed recycler that converts them to crumb rubber which is used to make road beds (overtopping for asphalt) which reduces road noise and tire wear. Tires do not go to the landfill. Phase I and Phase 11 environmental site assessment and technical evaluation have been conducted. Multiple borings were done at the site to assess both the geostrategic analysis and structural foundation designs. Samples were taken to validate that the environmental contamination had decreased to below action levels. C/Lin said that the property has 20 parking spaces with 10 spaces taken up by employees. He asked if the remaining 10 spaces would be adequate to take care of customer parking with no spill over onto the streets. Mr. Wainwright said he believed the parking would be sufficient because customer vehicles are turned over (bay turn) so quickly. There are four service bays which leaves sufficient parking for additional customers. C/Shah asked whether tire delivery and pickup would take place during working hours. Mr. Wainwright responded that tire delivery takes place during normal business hours only. Trucks deliver replenishment goods only to replace what was sold the previous week. Chair/Torng asked staff about the parking and whether there was a "no parking" zone on the street. CDD/Gubman said he was not familiar with the history on reviewing the parking situation or studying whether or not to designate Cold Spring Lane as a "no parking" zone because that is actually within the purview of the Traffic and Transportation Commission, which is staffed by the City's Public Works Department and any recommendation that would follow such a review and analysis would be forwarded to the City Council for discussion and possible action. This question can be directed to the Public Works Director and staff would be happy to get in touch with Mrs. Baudin to provide her with a more thorough answer about the traffic situation on her street and how her request/inquiry can be responded to. OCTOBER 8,20`13 PAGE 7 PLANNING COMMISSION Vinod Kashyap felt that an influx of business from shopping center visitors would create traffic flow and parking problems for the tire store and shopping center. VC/Farago asked staff to respond to Mrs. Baudin's concerns about construction hours. CDD/Gubman stated that the City's Code limits hours of construction and construction related noise to Monday through Saturday 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. C/Dhingra asked if the delivery would be executed via Diamond Bar Boulevard or Cold Spring Lane. CDD/Gubman responded that there is no stated restriction on the delivery points of access. Since this is a use that is permitted by right and not a conditional use, there are no use restrictions that could be conditioned on the project. However, America's Tire Co. is a national credit tenant that has a highly regarded reputation for beinga good neighbor so this is probably a more appropriate opportunity to have this discussion with America's Tire Co. so that the company can reach out to the neighborhood residents and address any issues with respect to the property and the availability of the company representatives to the neighborhood to abate any potential and/or future problems. Chair/Torng closed the public hearing. C/Lin said that typically, tire stores generate about half of the traffic of a service station. With respect to more people visiting the store on Saturday, the opportunity for service is limited by the parking and bays so generally, people will be scheduled to return. He believes it is a good project and architecturally, the project is very sound. C/Lin moved, C/Shah seconded, to approve Development Review No. PL2013- 215, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. Motion carried by the following Roll Call voter AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Dhingra, Lin, Shah, VC/ Farago, Chair/Torng NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None 7.3 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No 72295 Development Review and Tree Permit No. PL2013-229 — The applicant requested approval of a Vesting Tentative Tract Map to subdivide an existing vacant 30 -acre site known as "Site D" into 63 lots for the development of 182 for -sale dwelling units and a minimum two -acre neighborhood public park. Development Review approval was requested for the proposed architectural and landscape design elements associated with the proposed residential component of Site D. A Tree Permit OCTOBER 8, 2013 PAGE 8 PLANNING COMMISSION was also requested to remove 83 existing protected trees consisting of 75 Southern Black Walnuts, 6 Willows and 2 Coast Live Oaks; and, replace them at a 3:1 ratio with 75 Coast Live Oak and 174 Sycamore trees. The property is zoned Specific Plan (SP) with a consistent underlying General Plan land use designation of Specific Plan. PROJECT ADDRESS: Site comprised of approximately 30.36 acres located at the southeast corner of Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard (Los Angeles County Assessor's Parcel Numbers 8714-002-900, 8714- 002-901, 8714-002-902, 8714-002-903 and 8714- 015-001). PROPERTY OWNERS: Walnut Valley Unified School District and City of Diamond Bar APPLICANT: Lennar Homes of California, Inc. 25 Enterprise, Suite 300 Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 CDD/Gubman explained that Site D is predominately surplus Walnut Valley Unified School District property and has been surplus property for several decades. The City, in partnership with the school district embarked on a master planning effort around 2008 to establish a roadmap and set of goals, policies and objectives for the buildout of the Site D property. Initially, over the 30 acre site, the Specific Plan that was presented to the public and Planning Commission when the public hearing process started consisted of half of the site (about 15 gross acres) being allocated for up to two hundred residences and the other half (about 15 gross and 10 net acres) would be a commercial shopping center with a maximum intensity of about 153,000 square feet. The public process that ensued resulted in neighborhood workshops and further analysis of the market feasibility of the commercial, etc. and the outcome of the public process was that the commercial component was eliminated from the project and approved as a 100 percent residential development but still with a unit count capped at 200. In addition, the Specific Plan included a requirement for a minimum of a two -acre useable park that would be constructed by the eventual purchaser and developer of the property and would then be dedicated to the City in a turnkey fashion. The Specific Plan was ultimately approved with those specifications in early 2012 and since that time, the property has been placed for sale. Lennar Homes, one of the country's largest residential developers, has entered into escrow with the school district as the majority owner of the property and the City which is 4.5 percent owner of a small sliver of the property. Since entering into escrow Lennar has followed through with obligations to embark on a public outreach effort on the park design and although the particulars of the park are not a part of tonight's approval, there is OCTOBER 8, 2013 PAGE 9 PLANNING COMMISSION a park concept plan, provided in the Planning Commission packet, that is being designed for presentation to the City Council at a later date. It should be noted, however, that the conceptual plan is faithful to the neighborhood consensus that was achieved through the neighborhood outreach process. What the Commission is being presented with tonight is a residential development for 182 units and 2.5 usable acre neighborhood park that would be dedicated to the City upon completion. The Commission's charge this evening is to review the Tract Map, Development Review and Tree Permit and the Addendum to the EIR that addresses refinements to the actual project in comparison to the vision for the development that was set forth in the Specific Plan, and to determine whether or not what is being proposed is substantial conformance with the Site D Specific Plan. If so, staff would recommend that the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution that recommends approval of the project that is composed of several entitlement components to the City Council for its approval. CDD/Gubman further stated that the components of the park that the Commission will be reviewing are in the Tract Map wherein the two parcels are delineated that provide the location for the park. If the Commission recommends approval of the Tract Map it will set in place the footprint in which the park would be placed. As SP/Lee will explain, there is a part of the park called "the rain garden." Under the Federal and State Water Quality mandate/requirements, all of the stormwater runoff for this site needs to be retained up to a specified storm event. The proposed rain garden satisfies that stormwater retention requirement but it is being placed within the park and similar to how a golf course is often designed within a flood plain, this feature is being designed as a useable recreational amenity. As far as the concept of the rain garden, it will be a necessary and integral component to this development because it serves a stormwater retention mandate. Park amenities such as benches and play equipment, tree species and other features are part of a public park, which is outside the scope of the Planning Commission's review authority. The Parks and Recreation Commission will review the park portion of the project and provide its recommendation to the City Council. SP/Lee stated that this project executes the Site D Specific Plan which was approved in February 2012. The Specific Plan set forth criteria to guide the development of this approximately 30 -acre vacant land to allow up to 200 for - sale dwelling units and require that at least two useable acres be set aside for a public neighborhood park. The project is located at the Southeast corner of Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard and consists primarily of Walnut Valley Unified School District property, as well as an approximately one acre strip of land along Brea Canyon Road west of the flood control channel. The flood control channel and the portion of the channel that breaches the City and school district properties is owned and maintained by the LA County Flood Control District. Lennar Homes is proposing to develop a new master planned gated residential community which consists of 182 for -sale dwelling units, as OCTOBER 8, 2013 PAGE 10 PLANNING COMMISSION well as a 4.7 gross acre -2.5 useable acre -neighborhood park to be dedicated to the City. The following entitlements are being requested and the Planning Commission will forward its recommendation to the City Council for a Vesting Tentative Tract Map to subdivide the property into 63 lots for the development of 182 units and a 2.5 net useable acre public park; Development Review of the proposed architectural landscape design elements associated with the proposed residential project; and, a Tree Permit to remove 83 existing protected trees and replace them at a 3:1 ratio with 249 trees to be planted on site. The project site can be described as a relatively flat plateau with steep slopes. There are three types of protected trees that currently reside on the property including 75 Southern California Black Walnut, 6 Willow and 2 Coast Live Oak. There are three intermittent blue line streams which flow generally from east to west. The site has unique planning challenges due to ancient landslides on the property and although the landslides are inactive, they have created layers of weakness that require designing the site to achieve minimum code of factors of safety. There are two main building pads proposed which were designed around the geotechnical constraints of the site. The site was designed to build the southeastern portion of the site indicated as Pad #1 at a higher elevation in order to establish grades that meet certain elevation targets to comply with the minimum safety factors. Raising the pad levels resulted in the curvature of the private streets. There are two 16 foot high retaining walls (highlighted in red on the plan) that separate the two main building pads. The townhome and detached single family neighborhoods are located on the lower pad which is indicated as Pad #2 and the detached single family neighborhood is located on Pad #1. The lower pad consists of two tiers, townhomes on the lower tier (far western portion of the site) and the single family detached condos on the upper tier (along the north side of the site). The design to build up the building pads along the southeastern portion of the site also helps to stabilize the slopes of the existing homes on Ambusher Street abutting the site. The basic framework for development of the underlying Tract Map, the Vesting Tentative Map, proposes to subdivide the property to accommodate the following different uses: 62 townhomes; 73 detached condominiums (cluster homes) on Pad #2; 47 lots for individual sale of production homes on Pad #1 along the southeast portion of the site; private streets, slopes, open space areas owned in common by the HOA and a neighborhood park. Lennar proposes to market the new community as Willow Heights and the development will consist of the three distinct neighborhoods previously mentioned, each of which will be defined by its own housing type. The project complies with the Specific Plan Design Guidelines through a diversity of architectural styles and smooth transitions between structures and landscape features. OCTOBER 8, 2013 PAGE 11 PLANNING COMMISSION One of the neighborhoods includes 62 townhomes. Each structure is three stories high with a total of 11 structures. There are four different floor plans with livable areas ranging from 1,491 to approximately 2000 square feet. The townhomes have two architectural styles, Spanish and Italian. Buildings provide articulation and integration of various textures, colors and accents on walls, as well as variation of details around the entry doors to create individuality between the units. There are 72 units proposed for the cluster homes (detached single family condos). Each home is two -stories high with a maximum height of 32 feet. There are three different floor plans with livable areas ranging from approximately 1,800 to 2,000 square feet. The homes have good streetscape diversity facing Diamond Bar Boulevard and within the private streets. There is individuality between each unit that faces street views. All of the front entrances have alcoves. The Italian style has exposed rafter tails and stone veneer incorporated around the building are the Tuscan style has detailed cornices below the edges of the roof, trim around the corners of the exterior walls and wainscoting on the base of the building. There are 47 units proposed on 60 x 70 foot parcels which have two exterior styles, Spanish and Tuscan. Lot sizes range from. approximately 4,000 to 7,800 square feet. Each home is two stories with the maximum building height at 29 feet. There are two floor plans with livable areas ranging from 2,850 to 3,400 square feet. These detached traditional single family homes have a higher caliber of design detail and materials such as simulated limestone around the base of the buildings, entry doors with roof elements and varied window enhancements that are thoughtfully arranged and balanced. The conceptual park plan incorporates an approximately 4.7 gross area neighborhood park which contains the City owned parcel along Brea Canyon Road and 3.8 acres of land east of the flood control channel. The 3.8 acres includes a rain garden and paseo along the southwest portion of the site. The conceptual park plan was derived with input from the park design charrette early January 2013. The precise plan of the park is not part of the Planning Commission's review this evening; however, it is noteworthy that the Specific Plan envisioned the neighborhood park site near Pasado Drive with vehicular access through the park through a public street at Cherrydale Drive and Diamond Bar Boulevard. At the time, the Specific Plan did not envision a viable use of the City owned strip along Brea Canyon Road, therefore, was not viewed to be a park site since the area did not meet the 2 -acre minimum requirement. However, during the Specific Plan neighborhood workshops, the community wanted a park where it is currently proposed near Brea Canyon Road and with input from the park design charrette held early this year, Lennar came up with creative use of the land along Brea Canyon Road by providing a link between the two parcels via a pedestrian bridge. OCTOBER 8, 2013 PAGE 12 PLANNING COMMISSION The park is comprised of the following features: The rain garden which serves a dual purpose as a public recreational amenity and a private stormwater collection facility for the residential development. The rain garden is modeled after a facility in Aliso Viejo, which is very similar to the one being proposed for this project. The park also contains an approximately 600 foot long. 30 foot wide pedestrian trail along the southwesterly boundary of the site. The pedestrian access is at the end of Pasado Drive which leads to the rain garden and pedestrian bridge that connects to the park. An entry feature will be located in close proximity to the corner of Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard which will serve as a prominent landmark into the entrance of the City and the precise location of the park entry feature will be determined when the park plans are finalized. Parking for the park trailhead will be incorporated along the Brea Canyon Road on the City owned piece of property. The configuration and number of parking spaces will be finalized at a later date. SP/Lee showed slides of the Glenwood Basin in Aliso Viejo which showed trail access, native landscaping and water features. Primary access to the project is at Diamond Bar Boulevard at Cherrydale Drive which will serve as the spine road to the tract and terminates at the cul-de-sac at the southeast corner at the uppermost portion of the property. The development will be gated and the internal streets will be private roadways maintained by the HOA. Secondary emergency -only access will be provided at the cul-de-sac of Pasado Drive and will be gated to prohibit vehicular ingress/egress. The access way from Pasado Drive will be an entrance into the park from the adjoining neighborhood. Upon entering there will be a linear paved trail along the southerly boundary of the site. The proposed development is designed according to the Development Standards and Design Guidelines contained in the Site D Specific Plan and incorporates the following features: It provides a green and sustainability model requirement that looks at energy efficiency, as well as healthy indoor air quality, water efficiency, and the landscape irrigation will be designed for a future reclaimed water connection. Buildings will have 30 foot landscape setbacks from Diamond Bar Boulevard and along the perimeter of the project site. The building along street view will be articulated and diversified and in addition, a dense stand of Sycamore and Oak trees to replace the protected • trees on site will be planted within the large slopes abutting the existing residences. All retaining walls constructed along Diamond Bar Boulevard will be three feet high with integral color -faced retaining walls and hedges to cover the face of the walls to soften its visual appearance along Diamond Bar Boulevard. The two 16 foot high Verdura walls will be filled with live vegetation landscaping and flowering evergreen vines will be planted at the top of the slope to provide for cascading plants to further landscape the retaining wall. Canopy trees will be planted along the private internal streets, as well as along Diamond Bar OCTOBER 8, 2013 PAGE 13 PLANNING COMMISSION Boulevard and special treatment and decorative textured pavement at the main driveway. The table compares the proposed project with the development standards in the Specific Plan and the Specific Plan assumes that there would be modifications to these standards with a project -specific application and that the appropriate setbacks would be determined at the project level. Based on the traffic impact analysis prepared for the original EIR and updated to address the proposed development, the proposed project will not cause any intersections or street segments in the vicinity to operate at unacceptable levels with the following mitigation measures and improvements: 1) At Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard the developer will be required to widen and/or restripe the northbound Brea Canyon Road to provide second dedicated right -turn lanes; 2) widen and/or restripe the eastbound departure on Diamond Bar Boulevard to provide a third through -lane through the project frontage; 3) modify the existing median and restripe the westbound approach on Diamond Bar Boulevard to provide a second left -turn lane; 4) and maintain the existing bike lane on Diamond Bar Boulevard along the entire project frontage. At Cherrydale Drive and Diamond Bar Boulevard, the developer will provide: 1) an option left -through lane and a separate right -turn lane on the northbound approach; 2) restripe the southbound approach to provide an option left -through right -turn lane on Cherrydale Road; 3) widen the eastbound approach to provide a third through -lane along the project frontage; and f) widen the eastbound approach to provide a second separate right -turn lane. Additional improvements will include modifying medians and restriping Diamond Bar Boulevard to provide a single westbound left -turn lane and installing a traffic signal. In addition, the developer will pay fair -share fees of construction costs to implement additional traffic mitigation improvements. The project is designed to conform to the City's Hillside Management Regulations and the Specific Plan complements the character and topography of the hillside areas with 16 foot high Verdura walls which are lower than the maximum 18 foot high retaining walls prescribed in the Specific Plan. The retaining wall supporting fill slopes along the perimeter of the property do not exceed four feet. All finished slopes are not greater than 50 percent and earth tone building materials and color schemes are used to blend in with the natural landscape and landscaping is used to screen view of downslope building elevations. The project is designed to be compatible and complementary to the neighborhood by providing a quality housing development that will be attractive and serve as a visual gateway into the City; it is designed to minimize the negative impacts on the surrounding homes by providing landscape buffers; it creates minimal visual impact to the adjacent homes by building the new homes downhill on a lower pad level than the existing homes in the vicinity in order to retain view corridors; it creates a community environment with recreational OCTOBER 8, 2013 PAGE 14 PLANNING COMMISSION opportunities by incorporating a neighborhood park; and it incorporates a community identity through a landmark entry feature at the corner of Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard. The project will include street improvements along Diamond Bar Boulevard with street trees, sidewalk and bike trails and will comply with the Streetscape Design Standards currently being drafted by the City, which will incorporate tree wells, bus shelters, fencing and walls within the public right-of-way. Although there is no view protection standard in the City's Development Regulations, staff required a viewshed analysis because the southeasterly portion of the site is more elevated than envisioned in the Specific Plan. As shown in the visual simulations, the proposed development will respect the views of existing residential uses abutting the site. The key map illustrates the viewsheds from the rear yards of five existing residences located on Ambusher Street. These five homes were selected because the area of the site is elevated due to geotechnical constraints of the site. These residences are located approximately 120 to 190 plus feet away from the nearest buildings within the development. The existing residences are located on an approximately 10 foot higher building pad than the proposed homes. The applicant lowered the building pads by approximately 10 feet for the lots that most impact the lots on Ambusher Street. The City certified the Final EIR for the Specific Plan in February 2012 and the Final EIR analyzed the potential impacts resulting from the Specific Plan approval from both programmatic and project level perspectives. It analyzed development of the site for residential and recreational uses. With submittal of the project, staff prepared an Addendum to the Final EIR which includes minor technical changes in order to determine the project's consistency with the Specific Plan and documents that no new environmental issues have been identified. The project has been conditioned to include the mitigation measures to address the site-specific conditions for the project in order to make the project acceptable. SP/Lee noted a typo on Page 16 of the Resolution under Tentative Tract Map Condition of Approval #5 to include the following change to the last sentence: "If the 100th dwelling unit is within a multi -unit building, the building permit for the entire building shall be withheld until the park is completed." SP/Lee noted that staff received a letter from a resident recommending that the project be denied because the project will cause traffic to be worse than it currently is, a copy of which has been presented to the Commission this evening. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution recommending City Council approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295, Development Review and Tree Permit No. PL2013-229, based on the OCTOBER 8, 2013 PAGE 15 PLANNING COMMISSION Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the Resolution. C/Shah asked for an explanation of the proposed "optional" left turn. Rich Barretto, PE, LLG Engineers, who prepared the traffic addendum for the project, responded to C/Shah that it is an optional left through lane so the project would require the addition of appropriate striping to indicate that on a particular lane, a driver is permitted to make either a left turn or continue through the intersection. Chair/Torng asked for a clarification of the lot sizes on Page 5. He asked for a clarification of the "Next Gen" home also referred to on Page 5. SP/Lee explained that one of the floor plans in the 60 x 70 lots include a master suite. These homes are called multi -generational homes marketed by Lennar as "NextGen", The Home within a Home(D. The intent of the suites is to provide a flexible space that is connected to the main living areas of the home which contains a separate space with separate entrance, living area, bedroom, wet bar and laundry unit that could be used for a variety of uses or lifestyles including a second master bedroom suite, entertainment area or guest suite. These homes will be required as part of the CC&R's, as well as a condition of approval to prohibit cooktop kitchen facilities and separate metered utilities. All utilities serving the site will be common and dependent on the primary residence. Chair/Torng asked if a fire truck could go through the secondary emergency access and SP/Lee said that the gate functions as a pedestrian access but also serves as an emergency -only access that allows safety vehicles which will be able to access the subdivision. CDD/Gubman said that neighborhood access to the park would be allowed for pedestrians at Pasado Drive which would be served by a pedestrian gate which would be locked during the hours the park is closed. In the event of an emergency requiring emergency vehicles or if the fire department mandates an evacuation, the gate would be opened up for such purposes. Chair/Torng asked if Sycamore trees were a proper replacement tree for protected trees. SP/Lee explained that Sycamore trees are a protected trees in the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance so the applicant will be replacing with Sycamores and Oaks, both of which are protected trees. Chair/Torng opened the public hearing. Geoff Smith, Lennar Homes, applicant, said that Lennar Homes is very excited to bring Willow Heights to the City and to the Planning Commission for its consideration. When this project was first contemplated, Lennar Homes was OCTOBER 8, 2013 PAGE 16 PLANNING COMMISSION very happy to read the Specific Plan because it is really a great example of modern master planning techniques and methods so Lennar simply used the Specific Plan as its template for moving forward. Beyond the Specific Plan, the company drew its inspiration from the rich character of the site, surrounding area and the authenticity and rich character of the City. For example, Lennar Homes took to its heart the Tree Protection Ordinance and will use Live Oaks and Sycamores which are protected trees in Diamond Bar. These trees will be used throughout the site as a street tree and in focal areas, open space areas, etc. Lennar is using materials such as pavers and retaining wall in neutral earth tones to blend the development into the hillside. Lennar is using decorative luminaires in the streets that will provide a common design theme throughout the community. And the community will boast sustainable building practices such as high energy efficient homes, use of low VOC paint and drought tolerant landscaping. The homes located in one of three neighborhoods offer a diverse range of housing types for the City and will provide for a broad range of lifestyles. Some homes will be designed to meet the needs of multi -general households, which is a very common situation in today's society. With all of that said Willow Heights will bring a wonderful amenity to the City, with the four - acre public park which will offer new linkages to existing trails that will provide a connection to the natural environment and promote a healthy lifestyle. He introduced his design team and offered to respond to any questions the Commissioners might have. C/Lin said there was a specific reference to 'the sufficiency of the project's sewer storage" and it was very vague as to how it will be solved when the sewage capacity is overrun. Mr. Smith responded that the EIR spoke in broad terms about the site sewer being connected to a public system. As Lennar moved forward with its technical studies there was a specific study done generating sewage rates, etc. and through that process working through the City and LA County Public Works Department, it was determined that the storage capacity of the existing system for decades has been deficient when it comes to emergency storage. So during this process which is still ongoing as to how the City, as the owner of the system, and how LA County as the maintenance purveyor of the system, can work together to increase the emergency capacity or the safety of the system during power outage and other emergencies. Willow Heights was somewhat caught in the middle of that situation so Lennar's solution to that tonight is that Lennar will be paying a fair - share fee to the City that is related to this project's fair -share of the emergency storage. At a later date, the City and LA County will address the deficiency. C/Lin said it was a very costly undertaking and was surprised that the sewage capacity was deficient and in case of a major power outage after two hours the sewage would spill back. C/Lin said that neighbors are very concerned about the traffic. He read the traffic report this evening which states that this project will generate about 1,800 OCTOBER 8, 2013 PAGE 17 PLANNING COMMISSION cars per day which is not a lot in the scheme of things except during a.m. and p.m. peak hours when Diamond Bar Boulevard usually spills back to the proposed project entrance. The report says that both today and in the horizon year of 2030 when everything is built out, the level of service will be E and F for those intersections under analysis. Furthermore, there are recommended improvements but he did not see the resulting analysis after implementation of the recommendations. Also, it was not quite clear that upgrading street facilities at a cost of about $6.1 million would meet the horizon years' traffic demands. And, the project share is only $158,000 which seems to be a very small portion. He lives in a newer gated facility and he wanted to know how far the gate would be located from the street. He presumes that the project does not want to have a guardhouse at the gate in the future. In fact, his neighborhood did not intend to have a guardhouse but later put one in. A guardhouse is usually 20-25 feet further toward the street from the gate which means that at times, the tail of the third car might be sticking out into the street. Mr. Smith said he understood about the stacking distance behind the gate. Lennar asked the traffic engineer to look at that to ensure that a reasonable number of cars could stack behind the gate while it opened and Lennar felt comfortable with the design. He said he would check to see the exact distance between the gate and the street. He knows that the LA County Fire Department has definite requirements for that issue. C/Lin said that 50 feet is required. Mr. Smith said that in terms of level of service questions were best left to his traffic engineer. Rich Barretto stated that with respect to project impacts to the surrounding street system that yes, Diamond Bar has congested intersections and interchanges which are most likely due to bypass freeway traffic. The report identified locations of impacts at Diamond Bar Boulevard and Brea Canyon Road, Cherrydale Drive at Diamond Bar Boulevard and the southbound ramps at Diamond Bar Boulevard. With respect to the impacts at the southbound ramps and Diamond Bar Boulevard, the mitigation has been completed. That area has been signalized to take care of the bad service level. With respect to Diamond Bar Boulevard and Brea Canyon Road, the report calls out what the resulting service level would be at that intersection if the mitigation measures as identified were implemented and the result is a good service level. At Cherrydale Drive and Diamond Bar Boulevard, the result of implementing the mitigation measures is a good service level. Tables call out the result of implementation of recommended mitigation measures. He referred to Table 6, intersection 16 which looks at a buildout scenario. Regarding the project's fair -share of only $154,000 of the total $6.9 million projected for mitigation measures, it is relative to the project's contribution from a volume standpoint to the intersection. Table 6, ICU increment barely gets more than 2 percent at any of the intersections and in most cases, the report is down to the third level before any project impacts can be identified which is the primary reason the project's share is so small — it is because the measurable impact resulting from the added volume from the project is so small to everything else that is going on in the area. 1,500 trips during peak hours in comparison to what the original traffic study looked at with OCTOBER 8, 2013 PAGE 18 PLANNING COMMISSION a mixed-use commercial with 150,000 square feet of retail resulted in over 9000 daily trips and under that scenario that project's impact resulted in a much higher fair -share contribution. Because this project looks at residential units based on peak hour volumes it actually lowers the volume. If all of the improvements are implemented along the frontage at Diamond Bar Boulevard and Brea Canyon Road the project's impacts are more than offset. In fact, more capacity will be added for the traffic making its way through the City and not traffic that is generated by the project. Relative to the gate location, the document reports on the LA County Fire Department requirements for access and location and beyond that the analysis looked at a queuing assessment. Figure #14 calls out the dimensions including the location of the call box which is 50 feet in from the property line and from the curb face it is probably closer to 60 feet. The critical issue for most gated communities is not what the residential queue would be, because the remote gate opener in the driver's car would have been used and the gate would be open by the time the driver reached it. The guest queue demand for a community of this size would most likely be no more than one guest car during the peak period. He said he felt confident in saying that there would not likely be an issue of visitor vehicles backing up onto Diamond Bar Boulevard. C/Lin asked for confirmation that the $158,000 fair -share fee was a fee in addition to completion of the mitigation measures. Mr. Barretto responded "absolutely' and that includes the supposed share for the Diamond Bar Boulevard and Brea Canyon intersection for which the City is making improvements beyond the project's recommendations. On top of that, the signal is already installed at the southbound ramps but because the starting point on this project was pre -signal it made sense to do an apples - to -apples comparison and consider how the street may have changed from that standpoint. C/Dhingra said the plans show 6,000 cubic yards more of cut than the 2013 EIR indicates. He asked how the impacts of the truck traffic would be mitigated during grading and construction. Mr. Smith said that he is concerned about truck traffic on the City streets as well, and one of the conditions of approval is to prepare a traffic control plan for any construction traffic that would be required on City streets. In terms of the 6,000 yards, there may or may not be that amount by the time all of the grading activity and soil shrinkage occurs. There may not be any export or there may be more export. The odds are that there will be some export from the site and plans will be implemented to keep the City streets safe and proper demarcation of sidewalks and bike lanes will be done. C/Dhingra asked if this was intended to be a mitigation measure and Mr. Smith said he believed it.was a condition of approval prior to grading permit. Jeanette Ulrich, Assistant Superintendent of Business, Walnut Valley School District, stated that the district is very excited to be involved in this project with Lennar Homes, The Walnut Valley Unified School District is a very desirable district for schools to attend as the areas within the district are very sought after OCTOBER 8, 2013 PAGE 19 PLANNING COMMISSION with respect to property and property values. Should the district succeed with the closing of escrow in this project the district can continue to provide a superior educational program for students within Diamond Bar and the City of Walnut and to continue updating its facilities and keep its facilities in the condition they are matured to at this time with the support of the constituents in the issues of Measures S and `Y which moves modernization of facilities forward. She thanked the Commission for its consideration. Chair/Torng repeated that the public hearing was open for comments. Taylor Luan, 20955 Gold Run Drive, felt the project would negatively impact an already difficult traffic situation, especially during peak hours and wanted to know if that issue was addressed in the report. He complained that mature trees would be replaced with smaller trees. Vinod Kashyap, 21452 Chirping Sparrow Road and 3839 Castle Rock Road, said he went to the City Council meeting and expressed his concerns that the EIR was flawed for the following reasons: The EIR was based on as if one was doing a room addition on a cul-de-sac. He asked if he could have a list of people who were mailed notices because he lives within 300 yards and from what point is the distance measured for notices. He did not believe that anyone is living within 300 yards. CDD/Gubman touched on the history. This land was given to the school district in 1970 when the SR 57 was built, specifically for educational purposes. He is personally going to have Supervisor Knabe investigate the City Council and this entire process because the City paid for the EIR and said he believes fraud is being perpetrated on the citizens of Diamond Bar. He stated that this project is not going to happen. RECESS: Chair/Torng recessed the meeting at 9:08 p.m. RECONVENE: Chair/Torng reconvened the meeting at 9:20 p.m. Taylor Luan, 20955 Gold Run Drive expressed concerns about removal of mature trees and traffic in the area. Nick Prokop, 20909 Gold Run Drive was upset that this was a "done deal' and wondered why he was here this evening. He was concerned about traffic and other issues. He commented that when the City was unincorporated the citizens were promised that incorporation would never happen and look at where we are today. John Jones, 20925 Ambushers, stated he is a woodshop teacher and walnut trees make great furniture. He understands the EIR and Specific Plan are approved and will move forward and wondered if the trees that were being removed could be used for class projects. He was also concerned about OCTOBER 8, 2013 PAGE 20 PLANNING COMMISSION construction relocating wildlife into nearby neighborhoods. He was also concerned about traffic but believed traffic would be a problem in the City whether or not this project was built. He further added that he visited a new park in the City of Brea and would like to see one here too. He asked if the wetlands (rain garden) was designed to address mosquito problems. Octavio Colon, 3101 Crooked Creek Drive, asked why the fire fighters and police were not present tonight and was curious to know how the proposed development would impact the response time. He was also concerned about wildlife, and the trees that would be removed. He stated that he lives on a curved street and it was designed incorrectly. He asked who would be responsible if a car ends up on his yard. Ryan Farsai, Laguna Hills and owner of the Diamond Bar Arco station said he understands the neighborhood's concern however he was in favor of the project and believed it would beautify the corner and rid the area of trespassers and dirt bike riders. Darcy Gunter, 3427 Castle Rock Road said they told her that she could not attend any meetings (she did not clarify who "they" were) and pointed out the location of her house and how she thought the project would affect her. She stated that this was the first she heard of these meetings and did not know they were going on for as long as has been mentioned this evening. She believes the City did not do a good job in notifying the residents and she is very upset. She went to the board and identified her home and wanted the Commission to know how this development would affect her neighborhood. She believes it is a bad development that would lower the value of homes around her neighborhood. After hearing Ryan Farsai speak in favor of the project she said she would no longer buy her gas at the Arco Station and would persuade her neighbors to do the same. Lew Herndon, resides on Rio Lobos, spoke on behalf of Pastor Mark Hopper of the Evangelical Free Church located across the street from Site D. Pastor Hopper had to leave the meeting due to another commitment. The church wants to know if this project would cause the City to withdraw its permit for street parking on Diamond Bar Boulevard in front of the church on Sundays. David R. Busse, 21455 Ambushers Street attended all of the meetings. Unfortunately, when the applicant was responding to comments people were speaking from the audience and he missed the response about how high or low the new houses would be compared to his house. He still has not received an answer to that question. He has listened to the applicant but still no direct answer how high or low the homes will be as it relates to his property. He said he did not want to live in Irvine or Aliso Viejo or sit in traffic for 40 minutes. He added that there should be access to the park from the development. He was OCTOBER 8, 2013 PAGE 21 PLANNING COMMISSION upset that this appeared to be a done deal with a lack of transparency and it greatly concerns him. Fara Lou, resides on Gold run. She stated that she has concerns with the planting of Sycamore trees causing allergies. She asked if adequate visitor parking is provided on-site and whether it complies with the development code. Mike Perez, 3241 Castle Rock, stated there was lack of transparency and information was not on City's website. James Eng, 20935 Running Branch Road, expressed concerns about traffic patterns at the intersections of Diamond Bar Boulevard at Brea Canyon Road and at Copper Canyon Road on work days. Salim Akbany, 21179 Chirping Sparrow Road, said he was ignorant about this project until today and now finds it is progressing toward conclusion and questioned the notification process. Brenda Ashraf, 3407 Crooked Creek Drive said that until today she knew nothing about this project and did not understand the concept of protected trees if the trees were going to be removed. Chair/Torng closed the public hearing. Mr. Smith responded to Mr. Busse that in working with staff, existing home sites were selected because they represented the "worst case" of the viewshed. The way the topography works is that these homes climb higher further away from Willow Heights so the viewshed becomes better and better as one moves up Ambushers Drive. He provided a visual to show Mr. Busse that at a certain point his home is 74 feet above the homes and over 335 feet away. The Tentative Tract Map establishes grades and the rear yard of the home pointed out on the visual is 74 feet above the grade established on the Tentative Tract Map. Mr. Busse asked if that grade was higher or lower at that point than the present elevation of the ground. Mr. Smith responded that the proposed grade is roughly 10 feet above natural in that area. Mr. Smith explained that the viewshed analysis is based on proposed and not existing so the analysis is reflecting the future condition. Mr. Smith responded to speakers concerned about tree replacement that there are a number of problems with the Black Walnuts. The landscape architect explained that he attempted to work within the confines and outline of the replacement trees that were dictated by the City and while the Black Walnut is certainly a candidate tree, in his experience it tends to have a weak branch structure and is susceptible to breakage during windstorms. And while this is no longer an open space situation and more of a rural suburban development, OCTOBER 8, 2013 PAGE 22 PLANNING COMMISSION his team sought a tree that was more respectful of those exposures and leaned toward the Sycamore. While there have been comments about the allergy consideration of the Sycamore, there are considerations with different cultivars of Sycamore and he is not sure that the tree replacement that the City has provided allows for that interpretation but it may be a consideration. The same is true of Oak Trees. There are smaller varieties of oak trees as opposed to Live Oak that would allow for planting of more oaks and less Sycamores which is also a consideration. Mr. Smith stated that as the project moves forward with its final design they will work with staff to choose the correct variety and number of Sycamores versus Live Oaks to create a good balance. As part of the permits with the Fish and Wildlife Agency they are mitigating at a 3:1 ratio Black Walnut habitat offsite. Mr. Smith responded to a question about traffic on Pasado Drive. This project will not be using Pasado, Crooked Creek or Castle Rock as construction entrances. The construction entrance will be off of Diamond Bar Boulevard and will have a traffic control plan implemented for construction traffic. Mr. Smith responded to a question about rodent control prior to grading and Lennar has agreed to a Condition of Approval prior to grading that would involve rodent control. This is a concern that the company has had in the past that as soon as the machines are fired up the rodents move into neighbors yards so there will be a rodent control measure implemented. Mr. Smith responded to a question about a timeline and stated that Lennar is planning to break ground in January 2014 and should have model homes open in the fall of 2014. Mr. Smith stated that with respect to mosquitoes in the rain garden, Lennar will be working with the LA County Vector Control. Most important is that the park maintenance plan will be critical and Lennar will work with City staff on an adequate maintenance plan that will ensure that any plants that are grown in the pond do not take over the pond and become a mosquito habitat. Regular maintenance will be provided to ensure that mosquito fish are kept alive and the ponds can be adequately accessed to keep them maintained which will be part of the strategy going forward. Regarding comments about the pictures of the Aliso Viejo Glenwood Basin, Mr. Smith indicated that tonight the design details of the park are not being addressed but it will be the City's unique opportunity to help Lennar design the park that meets the City's and community's needs. In no way is Lennar attempting to copy a landscape palette from Aliso Viejo, this park will be the City's own and Lennar will be working with the Parks and Recreation Commission and CSD/Rose and his people to ensure development of a park that meets the needs of the City. OCTOBER 8, 2013 PAGE 23 PLANNING COMMISSION Mr. Smith responded to comments about emergency access, traffic and the fire department review. The Tentative Tract Map was reviewed by the LA County Fire Department and was approved as part of the process. Mr. Smith stated in response to a comment about construction hours that the City Ordinance calls out hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday and the project hours will typically not go until 7:00 p.m., rather typically to 3:00 p.m. There are times when extended work is necessary but by and large construction will go from 7:00 a.m. to approximately 3:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. C/Shah asked Mr. Smith to comment on visitor parking for the park. Mr. Smith said that this project far exceeds the visitor parking requirement called out in the Specific Plan. Visitor parking is distributed throughout the site and generally for the single family detached homes and the detached condos the parking will be along the backbone streets which are wide enough to accommodate parking on both sides. For the townhomes, parking stalls will be spread throughout the area. C/Shah asked about access points for the park area. Mr. Smith said this is a very important consideration that Lennar has given a lot of attention. Certainly, there will be pedestrian public access from Pasado Drive. From inside the community there will be points of connection for pedestrians and obviously, the entrance will also have pedestrian gates. Other access points are under consideration. C/Lin asked the distance between the intersections of Diamond Bar Boulevard and Cherrydale Drive and Brea Canyon Road. Mr. Smith responded that the distance is approximately 900 feet. C/Lin asked if the traffic engineer tested the queuing to see if the overall coordination would work during the pm peak hours. Mr. Barretto responded that the 800-900 feet meets the stacking requirement for the project. Cherrydale is a non -issue. The project is adding a second lane southbound on Brea Canyon which extend +220 feet. The critical movement is the westbound left to go southbound and bypass traffic to northbound right. The project improvement is the second northbound right. With respect to comments about traffic, Mr. Barretto explained that from a traffic standpoint and a modeling standpoint, the general belief is that when projects like these are built, traffic generally gets worse which may be the case in some instances; however, when the project is actually putting in capacity enhancing improvements like a second westbound left and a second northbound right, the post project condition is actually better. C/Shah said that the City and residents are very concerned about cut through traffic and 2030 projections. Mr. Barretto said that as these improvements are installed the traffic gets to a good service level and the project is actually OCTOBER 8, 2013 PAGE 24 PLANNING COMMISSION implementing one of the most important improvements in the City because of the congestion in the area. C/Shah said the report did not project cut through traffic. Mr. Barretto said that C/Shah is correct. One of the modeling expectations when looking at forecasting volumes in the future is to either use a model that tries to consider what is happening on the freeway, or whether it is a straight line growth or compounded growth. What the report does take into consideration is what is happening in terms of planned improvements so the forecast volumes take into consideration the project, freeway, proposed improvements and Caltrans proposed improvements. Is it to the point one could actually predict that all of this growth that is happening between now and 2030 is X amount of cut through traffic and that cut through traffic will double or triple? No, the report does not get into that level of specificity. C/Dhingra said that earlier it was stated that the distance between Brea Canyon Road and Cherrydale Drive was about g00 feet. He asked what kind of stacking Cherrydale Drive can take to make a left turn exiting the development. Mr. Barretto reiterated that the gate is 80 feet back and will accommodate four cars. There has been a lot of talk about cut through traffic but when people come off of the SR57 to make a right turn on Grand Avenue it is the portion of roadway that is generally most congested. One of the mitigation measures is to put pressure sensors on the extension of Cherrydale Drive which would give a driver the prior right to make a left turn. This is a City of Diamond Bar issue, not a project issue, and is probably not within the purview of the Planning Commission but more likely within the purview of the Traffic and Transportation Commission to see how the arterial and cut through traffic that has to sit at traffic lights will quit cutting through. His point to the designers is that four cars to make a left turn is not adequate because traffic will begin to stack up on Cherrydale Drive. Mr. Barretto responded that this project deals with less than 200 homes. C/Dhingra said that what is not acceptable is that during peak hours only four people can make a left turn. Chair/Torng said he believed that the City had been open and transparent about this project and he has complete confidence in City staff. The audience seems to have concerns about the issue of transparency and he asked staff to tell the audience where they can get the information pertinent to this project. Chair/Torng also asked staff to comment on the notification procedure. CDD/Gubman stated that the notification boundary is 1000 feet from the perimeter of the project. He used an overhead to show the perimeter and indicated that all properties touched by the 1000 foot radius would receive a notice. In addition to properties within 1000 feet of the exterior boundaries of the project site a mailing list was maintained for individuals that had contacted the City in response to other notifications, either in the City's newsletter or the City's website. When the EIR was out for public review and when public workshops were being held there was information on the homepage of the OCTOBER 8, 2013 PAGE 25 PLANNING COMMISSION Diamond Bar website. There is still information on Site D under a search bar on the home page. In addition to the radius and people who asked to be notified, through the four workshops that were held during the entire Specific Plan and Park effort, anyone who attended those workshops and signed in were added to the mailing list. There were several efforts to publicize this project during the Specific Plan process and through the notification process, while state law requires a 300 foot radius Diamond Bar goes out 1000 feet and adds to its mailing list when requested to do so. In addition to the numerous contacts received by the City when the Draft EIR was released for public review, those individuals were added to the mailing list. In terms of transparency, the.City makes every effort to go as far as possible to notify people. Unfortunately, no matter how genuine the attempt to provide public notification, staff always hears it has fallen short. The reality is that the City takes extra efforts to reach out to the public about its projects. Chair/Torng asked about a speaker's concern regarding the Church parking issue and CDD/Gubman said he had no response other than if the Church is currently permitted by the City to park on the street it is a Public Works approval and a matter for that department. He said he did not see a nexus between development of this project and continuing the on -street parking along the Church frontage. The Church is looking at doing some improvements. In fact, CDD/Gubman has met with Pastor Hopper about plans being envisioned for the site which include opportunities to add off-street parking and parking within the Church campus. He said he did not believe there would be anything as a result of this project that would preclude an ongoing practice with respect to on -street parking to serve the Church. C/Dhingra asked if the Tree Ordinance contains a blanket 3:1 replacement ratio or is it based on tree damage which evolved into a ratio of 3:1. CDD/Gubman said the Ordinance calls out a 3:1 ratio and there is a minimum diameter and the caliper for a protected tree has to be eight (8) inches and if it is at that threshold or larger it would have to be replaced at a 3:1 ratio. With the 3:1 ratio there is a proportion of a 24 -inch box and 15 gallon trees that have to be provided for. C/Lin said that there has been a lot of discussion about traffic issues and the purpose of this agenda item has been lost, one of which is to review the architectural landscape design elements. He asked if the building color is set in stone and CDD/Gubman responded that part of the Commission's design authority is to comment on the colors and make recommendations. C/Lin said that the color on the Tuscan home A-21 is not really earth toned. He would not buy a home with this color on the exterior. Mr. Smith provided the color charts to the Commissioners. Allen Scales from KTGY Group said he recognized that color output sometimes shifts on copy process and from one computer to the next. There is no intent to go with "blue" color schemes and the colors are OCTOBER 8, 2013 PAGE 26 PLANNING COMMISSION trying to conform to a warmer and richer earth tone. Certainly, the color design is very subjective and they are open to making changes and finding a palette that is acceptable to the City. The goal of the project is to provide variety to the street scene. The cluster home colors are provided six different color schemes to meet that objective — three are for the Spanish architecture and three additional color schemes for the Tuscan architecture. C/Lin said that when the plan is approved, the sequence of the color scheme will be set and homeowners will not be allowed to stray from those colors. Mr. Smith said Lennar would work with the architect, design team and the City to create a plotting of colors so that they are distributed in a way that makes sense and remains in overall harmony with the project. C/Lin is correct that the developer does not allow the homeowner to pick and choose colors because it could potentially create a "scatterboard" effect. The developer takes a holistic approach to the community in making sure that everything is in harmony and all of the design works together. C/Lin read from Item C on Page 5 with reference to selling a portion of a unit. He felt there was no way that the HOA would find out if a cooktop kitchen was installed because the best CC&R's would not prevent people from doing so. Mr. Smith said the intent of those conditions is to discourage the NextGen component of the home to be sold or rented. One could not sell the NextGen piece separately because the property is not being subdivided in that manner. Regarding the metering, the developer will be processing meter plans with the City and utility agencies and these homes will not have two meters and two services to each home. With respect to the cooktop, in any situation a developer can only control what it builds and a developer can set up CC&R's that it trusts and hopes will maintain the integrity of the community down the road. Ultimately, the developer does not have much control after that. He felt it would be prohibitive for a homeowner to put in a cooktop because it would result in a major remodel and at that point the City would not allow a building permit. C/Dhingra stated that with respect to this project, the scope of the Planning Commission is very narrow because the EIR has been certified and the Specific Plan has been adopted and approved. He is frankly very surprised that people have said tonight that they have not heard about this project. When one considers how long this project has been in the works and in his opinion, staff has done a tremendous job. There were four workshops and residents within 1000 feet of the project were notified even though the state requires only 300 feet. The Planning Commission's scope is the Tree Permit, Development Review (architecture and color schemes, etc) and Vesting. Vesting is essentially the right of the property owner to develop the property. The Commission's scope is to determine that this project complies with the Specific Plan and that the EIR has been certified. If people feel strongly about a OCTOBER 8, 2013 PAGE 27 PLANNING COMMISSION developer being able to drive a tractor through the area they need to challenge CEQA on the matter. From his vantage point he is satisfied that the Tree Permit complies with the City Ordinance. The applicant made concessions to look at a different blend of Sycamores and Oaks for a better balance in the event that some of the species produce more allergies and 75 of the trees are Black Walnut which will be mitigated under a California Fish and Game Wildlife Permit. Someone asked why the City would destroy protected species and if they are being destroyed at a 3:1 ratio those trees are being planted elsewhere in accordance with the state agency's requirement. With respect to the Development Review, there is room to figure out the final color panels and there are at least one half dozen schemes that have been shown to the Commission. Regarding the Vesting Tract Map he understands that traffic is an issue but traffic is an issue not because of this development, it is because of the people using Diamond Bar Boulevard as an alternative to the freeway which is not within the purview of the Planning Commission. Perhaps people who are present tonight could attend one of the Traffic and Transportation Commission meetings and ask them to alleviate those concerns. The Traffic and Transportation Commission would provide a more appropriate forum for those particular concerns. C/Shah said he agreed with C/Dhingra's summary of the project. The community has some good ideas about the traffic and believes these issues should be aired in front of the Traffic and Transportation Commission which has the authority to respond to such concerns. What he observed is that the developer has shown good faith in his estimation of this project. He is and will remain concerned about traffic but that issue is not within the purview of the Planning Commission. C/Lin echoed C/Dhingra's comments that the scope of tonight's meeting is limited to those three items. He understands that traffic and other issues are very emotional issues for residents. He believes the developer is doing their best to mitigate the 1,500 daily vehicle trips and spending a substantial amount to alleviate the traffic issue. The big problem is 50,000 or so cars a day on Diamond Bar Boulevard that will not go away whether a piece of property is developed or not. Chair/Torng thanked residents for attending tonight's meeting and understands their concern for Diamond Bar. He thanked staff, his colleagues and the developer for addressing all of the questions and concerns. Tonight's decision will be based on the facts and what the Planning Commission is challenged to do at this time. Chair/Torng advised Mr. Herndon to contact staff about parking on Diamond Bar Boulevard in front of the Evangelical Free Church. C/Dhingra moved to approve staff's recommendation that the Planning Commission recommend approval to the City Council of Vesting Tentative Tract OCTOBER 8, 2013 PAGE 28 PLANNING COMMISSION Map No. 72295, Development Review and Tree Permit No. PL2013-229, based on the Findings of Fact, and subject to the conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. C/Shah seconded the motion. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: a 91 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Dhingra, Lin, Shah, VC/ Farago, Chair/Torng NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None PLANNING COMMISSIONER COMMENTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: C/Shah said this was an interesting meeting that was handled very well by Chair/Torng and his colleagues. Of course staff put a great deal of effort into tonight's presentation and he thanked staff and Lennar Homes. C/Dhingra thanked staff for doing such a wonderful job and preparing the Commission as it did. He said he was very pleased to see the participation by the public on a project like this. If nothing else it not only voices their concerns it shows their concern for the community in which they live and in the City as a whole. VC/Farago thanked staff for doing a great job preparing the Commission for tonight's meeting. He thanked C/Dhingra for so eloquently stating the Commission's charge to the public which really moved things along. Chair/Torng felt C/Dhingra did a very good job tonight and the City is very fortunate to have such an experienced individual join the Planning Commission. He just learned that four of the five Commissioners are engineers. VC/Farago said he was a construction manager. Chair/Torng thanked staff and his colleagues for a very smooth meeting. The Commission does its best to do its job as it is charged to do for the benefit of the community. STAFF COMMENTS/INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 9.1 Public Hearing dates for future projects. CDD/Gubman thanked the Commissioners for their compliments to staff for supporting them for their charge as Commissioners. He highlighted SP/Lee's exemplary efforts in preparing a very difficult staff report and putting together a very densely packed and information filled presentation and delivering it to the Commission. It was not an easy task and was made even more difficult because she had to turn in her work to him to be reviewed because he is not the shiest person with a red pen. OCTOBER 8, 2013 PAGE 29 PLANNING COMMISSION The next Planning Commission meeting is October 22. He will be on vacation that week and the meeting will be staffed by SP/Lee. The October 22 agenda consists of the matter that was continued tonight, the new residence on Falcons View. In addition, there is an addition to an existing residence on Birdseye. The continuance for the addition on Ridgeline to address the retaining wall issue, the applicant is ready and the item will be heard on November 12, the only item on the November agenda at this time. 10. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS: As listed in tonight's agenda. ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Planning Commission, Chairman Torng adjourned the regular meeting at 10:47 p.m. The foregoing minutes are hereby approved this 22nd day of October, 2013. Attest: Respectfully Submitted, r C-;�" 15kLWWK Gubm Community Development Director To orng, Chairmen CITY COUNCIL Agenda 9 h _ -i* Meeting Date: November 19, 2013 AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: James DeStefano,City Ma a TITLE: Ratification of Check Register t'—e d October 31, 2013 through November 13, 2013 totaling $ 964,464.20 RECOMMENDATION: Ratify. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Expenditure of $ 964,464.20 in City funds. BACKGROUND: The City has established the policy of issuing accounts payable checks on a weekly basis with City Council ratification at the next scheduled City Council meeting. DISCUSSION: The attached check register containing checks dated October 31, 2013 through November 13, 2013 for $ 964,464.20 is being presented for ratification. All payments have been made in compliance with the City's purchasing policies and procedures. Payments have been reviewed and approved by the appropriate departmental staff and the attached Affidavit affirms that the check register has been audited and deemed accurate by the Finance Director. PREPARED BY: Luisa Fua Accounting Technician REVIEWED BY: Finance Director Attachments: Affidavit and Check Register— 10/31/13 through 11/13/13. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR CHECK REGISTER AFFIDAVIT The attached listings of demands, invoices, and claims in the form of a check register including checks dated October 31, 2013 through November 13, 2013 has been audited and is certified as accurate. Payments have been allowed from the following funds in these amounts: Description Amount General Fund $899,973.21 Prop A - Transit Fund $8,760.40 Prop C - Transit Tax Fund $5,993.14 Integrated Waste Mgt Fund $12,925.86 Comm Dev Block Grand Fund $12,495.27 LLAD 38 Fund $647.55 LLAD 39 Fund $426.60 LLAD 41 Fund $259.17 Debt Service Fund $1,500.00 Capital Imp Projects Fund $21,156.00 Computer Equipment Replacement Fund $327.00 $964,464.20 Signed: �L,6tyatA�r Dianna Honeywell Finance Director City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 10/31/2013thru 11/13/2013 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct # Amount Total Check Amount Check Date 10/31/2013 1 105773 ACCESS CONTROL SECURITY SECURITY SVCS-SEPT/OCT 0015333 45010 1 1,033.50 $1,033.50 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 1 105774 ALBERTSONS LLC SUPPLIES-REC 0015350 1 42353 1 618.63 $618.63 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 CDW GOVERNMENT COMP EQ-I.T. 0014070 41300 168.95 10/31/2013 1 105775 AMERICOMP GROUP TONERS- PRINTER 0014070 41200 1 175.44 $175.44 10/31/2013 3,313.60 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 FEDEX EXPRESS MAIL -FPL 2012-444 001 10/31/2013 1 105776 ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA CITIES MTG-COUNCIL 0014010 42325 1 30.00 $30,00110/31/2 10/31/2013 1 105777 AT&TMOBILITY CELL PHCHRGS-CMGR 0014030 42125 1 37.96 $37.96 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 1 105778 YVONNE BASTERRECHEA FACILITY REFUND-SYC CYN 001 1 23002 1 50.00 $50.00 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 1 105779 JOHN E BISHOP CONTRACT CLASS -FALL 0015350 1 45320 1 283.80 $283.80 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 1 105780 KATHYBREAUX CONTRACT CLASS -FALL 0015350 1 45320 1 216.00 $216.00 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 1 105781 CARDIAC SCIENCE CORP ELECTRODES-EOC 0014440 1 41200 1 397.63 $397.63 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 105782 CDW GOVERNMENT COMP EQ -13. 5304070 46230 327.00 $3,809.55 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 CDW GOVERNMENT COMP EQ-I.T. 0014070 41300 168.95 10/31/2013 1 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 PRINTSVCS-SIGNS C/HALL CDW GOVERNMENT COMP MAINT-I.T. 0014070 42205 3,313.60 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 1 105783 CNC PRINTWERKS PRINT SVCS -BUS CARDS 0014090 1 42110 1 70.85 $70.85 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 FEDEX EXPRESS MAIL -GENERAL 0014090 42120 206.34 10/31/2013 1 105784 DAY & NITE COPY CENTER PRINTSVCS-SIGNS C/HALL 0014090 1 42100 1 170.36 $170.36 10/31/2013 106.08 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 FEDEX EXPRESS MAIL -FPL 2012-444 001 10/31/2013 105785 CAROLADENNIS PROF.SVCS-CNCLMTG 0014030 1 44000 1 200.00 $200.00 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 1 105786 DIAMOND BAR MOBIL VEH MAINT-COMM SVCS 0014090 1 42200 1 16.16 $16.16 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 1 105787 EXTERMINETICS OF SO CAL INC FIRE ANTS -P GROW PARK 0015340 1 42210 1 450.00 $450.00 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 105788 FEDEX EXPRESS MAIL -GENERAL 0014090 42120 31.56 $375.25 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 FEDEX EXPRESS MAIL -GENERAL 0014090 42120 206.34 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 FEDEX EXPRESS MAIL -GENERAL 0014090 42120 106.08 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 FEDEX EXPRESS MAIL -FPL 2012-444 001 23010 31.27 10/31/2013 Page 1 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 10/31/2013thru 11/13/2013 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct # Amount Total Check Amount Check Date 10/31/2013 1 105789 FILLMORE & WESTERN RAILWAYCO ADULTEXCURSION 0015350 1 45310 1 667.00 $667.00 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 105790 GATEWAY CORPORATE CENTERASSOC CAPITAL CONTRIBUTION 0014093 42210 184.00 $1,785.00 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 1 GATEWAY CORPORATE CENTER ASSOC ASSOCIATION DUES-NOV 13 0014093 42210 1,601.00 10/31/2013 1 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 1 105791 1 GLOBALSTAR USA SATELLITE PHS -OCT 13 0014440 1 42125 1 3,058.84 $3,058.84 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 105792 HDL COREN & CONE CONTRACT SVCS -4TH QTR 0014090 44010 900.00 $7,656.86110131/2013 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 1 HDL COREN & CONE AUDIT SVCS -2ND QTR TAX 0014090 44010 6,756.86 10/31/2013 1 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 1 105793 BREANNA HERNANDEZ FACILITY REFUND -DBC 001 36615 1 400.00 $400.00 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA MTA PASSES -SEPT 2013 1125553 45535 60.00 10/31/2013 1 105794 DEREKALLEN TO PRORSVCS-HISTORICAL PROJ 0014095 44000 2,200.00 $2,200.00 10/31/2013 663.10 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. CONCERTS IN PK -AUG 13 0014411 10/31/2013 1 105795 J H DOUGLAS & ASSOCIATES PROF.SVCS-EIR PROJ 0015210 44220 1 30,710.21 $30,710.21 10/31/2013 1125553 45402 140.13 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 1 105796 JOE A. GONSALVES & SON INC. LEGISLATIVE SVCS-NOV 13 0014030 1 44000 1 3,000.00 $3,000.00 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 1 105797 SID KALARIA FACILITY REFUND -DBC 001 23002 1 466.00 $466.00 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 1 105798 KENS HARDWARE SUPPLIES -RD MAINT 0015554 1 41250 1 299.12 $299.12 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 1 105799 LILLEY PLANNING GROUP INC CONSULTANT SVCS -SEPT 2013 0015210 44250 1 6,550.00 $6,550.00 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 105800 LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA CITY SUBSIDY -SEPT 2013 1125553 45533 15.00 $75.00 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA MTA PASSES -SEPT 2013 1125553 45535 60.00 10/31/2013 1 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 105801 LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. CONTRACT SVCS -AUG 2013 0014411 45401 416,858.59 $427,733.28 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. CALVARY CHAPEL -AUG 13 0014411 45402 7,726.77 10/31/2013 1 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 NOV 2013 -FAP PREMIUMS LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. ST SWEEPER SVCS -AUG 13 0014411 45402 663.10 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. CONCERTS IN PK -AUG 13 0014411 45402 2,344.69 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT TRANSIT SALES -AUG 1125553 45402 140.13 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 1 105802 LOWE'SBUSINESS ACCOUNT SUPPLIES -DBC 0015333 41200 1 95.71 $95.71 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 1 105803 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK NOV 2013 -FAP PREMIUMS 001 21115 1 154.44 $154.44 10/31/2013 Page 2 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 10/31/2013thru 11/13/2013 10/31/2013 105806 MCE CORPORATION ROAD MAINT SVCS -SEPT 0015554 45502 4,471.25 $15,308.48 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name MCE CORPORATION Transaction Description 0015554 Fund/ Dept Acct # Amount Total Check Amount Check Date FACILITY REFUND -DBC MCE CORPORATION STORM DRAIN MAINT-SEPT 0015554 45512 1,620.14 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 1 105804 LISAMARQUEZ FACILITY REFUND -DBC 001 23002 1 600.00 $600.00 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 0015350 1 45320 1 108.00 $108.00 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 1 105805 MCCAIN T/SIGNAL CONTROLLERS 0015554 1 45507 1 8,360.30 $8,360.30 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 105806 MCE CORPORATION ROAD MAINT SVCS -SEPT 0015554 45502 4,471.25 $15,308.48 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 1 MCE CORPORATION RIGHT OF WAY MAINT-SEPT 0015554 45522 1,530.13 10/31/2013 1 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 FACILITY REFUND -DBC MCE CORPORATION STORM DRAIN MAINT-SEPT 0015554 45512 1,620.14 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 MCE CORPORATION VEGETATION CONTROL -SEPT 0015558 45508 7,686.96 NICOLE PRADO 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 105807 MOBILE RELAYASSOCIATES INC REPEATER SVCS -OCT 13 0014440 42130 78.75 $157.50 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 1 MOBILE RELAYASSOCIATESINC REPEATER SVCS-NOV 0014440 1 42130 78.75 1 10/31/2013 1 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 1 105808. NEXUS IS INC SECURITY CAMERAS -DBC 1 0014070 1 46230 1 15,356.26 $15,356.26 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 SCMAF ]MEMBERSHIP ERSHP DUES -BRADLEY 0015350 41200 8000 10/31/2013 1 105809 PACIFIC CREST YOUTH ARTS ORGAN17ATN FACILITY REFUND -DBC 001 23002 1 100.00 $100.00 10/31/2013 25.00 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 105810 NICOLE PRADO CONTRACT CLASS -FALL 0015350 1 45320 1 108.00 $108.00 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 105811 PROTECTION ONE INC ALARM SVGS -DBC 0015333 42210 69.76 $69.76 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 105812 BRIYANA RAMIREZ FACILITY REFUND-REAGAN 001 23002 1 50.00 $50.00 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 1 105813 S C SIGNS & SUPPLIES LLC SUPPLIES -RD MAINT 0015554 41250 1 670.35 $670.35 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 SCMAF ]MEMBERSHIP ERSHP DUES -BRADLEY 0015350 41200 8000 10/31/2013 1 105814 SAN GABRIELVALLEY CITY MGR ASSC MTG-CMGR/FIN DIR 0014030 42325 1 60.00 $60.00 10/31/2013 25.00 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 1 105815 SASAKI TRANSPORTATION SVCS INC TRFFC ENG SVCS -SEPT 13 0015210 1 44220 1 2,997.00 $2,997.00 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 1 105816 SCMAF INS -CONTRACT CLASS SUMMER 1 0015350 1 45320 1 491.20 $491.zo 10/31/2013 70/31/2013 105817 SCMAF DUES-TARAZON 0015350 41200 5000$155.00 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 SCMAF ]MEMBERSHIP ERSHP DUES -BRADLEY 0015350 41200 8000 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 SCMAF - ERSHP DUES -BILLINGS 0015350 41200 25.00 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 1 105818 SHARP SEATING EXCURSION -ROSE PARADE 0015350 1 45310 641.00 $641.00 10/31/2013 Page 3 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 10/31/2013thru 11/13/2013 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct # Amount Total Check Amount Check Date 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 105819 SIEMENS SIEMENS TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT-SEPT TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT-SEPT 0015554 0015554 45507 45507 4,102.00 12,276.39 $16,378.39 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 1 105820 SO COASTAIR QUALITY MGT DISTRICT PLAN FILING FEE -FY 13/14 0015333 1 45300 1 121.44 $121.44 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 THE SAUCE CREATIVE SERVICES SIGNS -HOLIDAY CONTEST 0014095 41400 600.00 10/31/2013 1 105821 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS -DIST 38 1385538 1 42126 1 27.97 $27.97 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 1 105822 MARY LEE SPERRY FACILITY REFUND -DBC 001 23002 1 100.00 $100.00 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 1 105823 GLENNSTEINBRINK CONSULTANT SVCS -WK 10/22 0014050 1 44000 1 1,125.00 $1,125.00 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 1 105824 TENNIS ANYONE INC CONTRACT CLASS -FALL -0015350 1 45320 1 4,256.00 $4,256.00 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 105825 THE COMDYN GROUP INC CONSULTANT SVCS -WK 10/18 0014070 1 44000 1 3,819.66 $3,819.66 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 105826 THE SAUCE CREATIVE SERVICES SIGNS -HOLIDAY CONTEST 0015350 42110 64.08 $664.08 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 THE SAUCE CREATIVE SERVICES SIGNS -HOLIDAY CONTEST 0014095 41400 600.00 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 105827 TIME WARNER CABLE INTERNET SVCS-HERITGE 0014070 44030 213.81 $352.22 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 TIME WARNER CABLE INTERNET SVCS-C/HALL 0014070 44030 1 138.41 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 1 105828 US BANK CITY CREDIT CARD -OCT 13 0014050 1 44000 1 21,227.91 $21,227.91 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 105829 VERIZON CALIFORNIA PH.SVCS-DBC EMER LINE 0015333 42125 467.89 $647.84 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 VERIZON CALIFORNIA PH.SVCS-HERITAGE PK 0014090 42125 179.95 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 1 105830 VISION SERVICE PLAN NOV 2013 -VISION PREMIUMS 001 21107 1 1,309.55 $1,309.55 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 WAXIESANITARYSUPPLY SUPPLIES -DBC 0015333 41200 111.03 10/31/2013 105831 WALNUT VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST FACILITY RENTAL-DBH 0015350 1 42140 1 235.20 $235.20 10/31/2013 10/3112013 105832 WAXIESANITARYSUPPLY SUPPLIES -DBC 0015333 41200 -1,405.71 $1,516.74 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 WAXIESANITARYSUPPLY SUPPLIES -DBC 0015333 41200 111.03 10/31/2013 1 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 105833 DANIELWESTON CONTRACT CLASS -FALL 0015350 1 45320 1 68.40 $68.40 10/31/2013 10/31/2013 1 105834 NANCYZEPEDA FACILITY REFUND -DBC 001 36615 1 440.00 $440.00 10/31/2013 Page 4 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 10/31/2013thru 11/13/2013 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct# Amount Total Check Amount Check Date 10/31/2013 105835 LANCE, BOLL & LUNGHARD LLP PROF.SVCS-FIN ST CONTRLLR 3704090 1 44010 1 1,500.00 $1,500.00110/31/2013 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 105836 ACCESS CONTROL SECURITY SECURITY GUARD SVCS -DBC 0015333 1 45010 1 1,144.80 $1,144.80 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 105837 ADVANTEC CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC ENG SVCS -AUG 2013 0015554 44520284.52 177.00 $3,424.52 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 ADVANTEC CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC ENG SVCS -SEPT 2013 0015554 44520 3,140.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 105838 WILLIAM ANDERSON PHOTO CONTEST WINNER 0014095 1 44000 1 50.00 $50.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 105839 ROBYN A BECKWITH PLANT SVCS -DBC OCT 0015333 45300 177.00 $689.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 ROBYN A BECKWITH PLANT SVCS -HERITAGE OCT 0015340 42210 135.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 - ROBYN A BECKWITH PLANT NIAINT-CITY HALL 0014093 42210 270.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 ROBYN A BECKWITH PLANT MAI NT -LIBRARY 0014093 42210 107.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 105840 BENESYST 11/08113-P/R DEDUCTIONS 1 001 1 21105 1 866.69 $866.69 11/7/2013 1117/2013 105841 HANH BENYO FACILITY REFUND -MAPLE HILL 001 23002 50.00 $25.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 HANH BENYO FACILITY CHRGS-MAPLE HILL 001 36625 -25.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 105842 BONTERRA CONSULTING INC. PROF.SVCS-FPL2002-09 001 23010 2,528.75 $7,049.68 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 BONTERRA CONSULTING INC. PROF.SVCS-FPL2002-65 001 23010 4,520.93 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 - BONTERRA CONSULTING INC. ADMIN FEES-FPL2002-09001 0015333 23012 455.18 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 BONTERRA CONSULTING INC. ADMIN FEES-FPL2002-09001 34430 -455.18 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 BONTERRA CONSULTING INC. ADMIN FEES -FPL 2002-65 001 23012 813.77 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 BONTERRA CONSULTING INC. ADMIN FEES -FPL 2002-65 001 34430 -813.77 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 105843 NATALIE CAIRE PHOTO CONTEST WINNER 0014095 1 44000 1 100.00 $100.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 105844 CALIFORNIA COMMERCIAL LIGHTING SPPL SUPPLIES -DBC 0015333 41200 294.30 $583.37 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 CALIFORNIA COMMERCIAL LIGHTING SPPL SUPPLIES -PARKS 0015340 41200 196.20 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 T&T COMM -10/10 CALIFORNIA COMMERCIAL LIGHTING SPPL SUPPLIES -DBC 0015333 41200 92.87 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 105845 JOSEPHINE CANTU FACILITY REFUND -DBC 001 23002 1 400.00 $400.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 105846 TEDACARRERA T&T COMM -10/10 0015510 1 44100 1 45.00 $45.00 11/7/2013 Page 5 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 10/31/2013thru 11/13/2013 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct # I Amount I Total Check Amount Check Date 11/7/2013 1 105847 XENACHACON PHOTO CONTEST WINNER 0014095 1 44000 1 100.00 $100.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 105848 XENACHACON PHOTOCONTESTWINNER 0014095 1 44000 1 100.00 $100.06 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 CONSTRUCTION HARDWARE CO SUPPLIES -PARKS 0015340 41200 455.95 11/7/2013 1 105849 DIANN CHANG FACILITY REFUND-SYC CYN 001 23002 1 50.00 $50.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 105850 CONSTRUCTION HARDWARE CO SUPPLIES -PARKS 0015340 41200 878.55 $1,334.50 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 CONSTRUCTION HARDWARE CO SUPPLIES -PARKS 0015340 41200 455.95 11/7/2013 1 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 105851 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES INDUSTRIAL WASTE -SEPT 0015510 1 45530 1 1,013.51 $1,013.51 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 105852 CSMFO MTG-HONEYWELL 0014050 42325 35.00 $75.00 11/7/2013 11/72013 CSMFO MTG-MCLEAN 0014030 42340 40.00 11/7/2013 1 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 105853 DAPEER ROSENBLIT & LITVAK LLP LEGAL SVCS -SEPT 13 0014020 44023 3,177.30 $7,011.57 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 DAPEER ROSENBLIT & LINAK LLP LEGAL SVCS-DECORAH TRUST 0014020 44023 - 3,118.06 11/7/2013 1 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 P & R COMM -10/26 DAPEER ROSENBLIT & LINAK LLP LEGAL SVCS -SHELL 0014020 44023 470.21 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 DAPEER ROSENBLIT & LINAK LLP LEGAL SVCS-MCCABE 0014020 44023 246.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 105854 1 DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES INC ENG SVCS -LEMON AVE 0015551 1 45221 1 257.18 $257.18 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 CAROLADENNIS PROF.SVCS-PLNGCOMM 0015210 44000 466.66 11/7/2013 1 105855 DAVID J. GRUNDY P & R COMM -10/26 0015350 1 44100 1 45.00 $45.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 105856 CAROLA DENNIS PROF.SVCS-P & R COMM 0015310 44000 225.00 $700.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 CAROLADENNIS PROF.SVCS-PLNGCOMM 0015210 44000 466.66 11/7/2013 1117/2013 CAROLA DENNIS PROF.SVCS-PLNGCOMM 0015210 44000 75.00 11/7/2013 1117/2013 105857 DIAMOND BAR MOBIL VEH MAINT-COMM SVCS 0015310 42310 480.68 $636.56 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 DIAMOND BAR MOBIL FUEL -COMM SVCS 0015310 42310 155.88 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 105858 DIANA CHO&ASSOCIATES CDBGSVCS-SRFROG 1255215 44000 369.00 $1,886.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 DIANA CHO & ASSOCIATES CDBG SVCS -DOG PARK 1255215 44000 984.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 DIANA CHO & ASSOCIATES CDBGSVCS -YMCA 1255215 44000 533.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 105859 DOGGIE WALK BAGS INC SUPPLIES -PARKS 0015340 1 41200 1 1,090.00 $1,090.00 11/7/2013 Page 6 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 10/31/2013thru 11/13/2013 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct # Amount I Total Check Amount Check Date 11/7/2013 1 105860 FRED DURAN D.J. SVCS -SCHOOL DANCE 0015350 1 45300 1 250.00 $250.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 105861 EXTERIOR PRODUCTS INC INSTALLADS-NOV 2013 0015350 45300 891.92 $4,627.36 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 EXTERIOR PRODUCTS INC INSTALL SVCS-NOV 2013 0015350 45300 3,472.53 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 PHOTO CONTEST WINNER EXTERIOR PRODUCTS INC INSTALL SVCS -NOV2013 0015350 45300 262.91 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 105862 RACHEL FIGUEROA FACILITY REFUND-PANTERA 001 23002 100.00 $100.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 HARDY & HARPER INC SIDEWALK REPAIRS -OCT 0015554 45504 9,798.00 11/7/2013 105863 GABRIEL PEREZ PHOTO CONTEST WINNER 0014095 1 44000 1 100.00 $100.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 105864 GABRIEL PEREZ PHOTO CONTEST WINNER 0014095 1 44000 1 50.00 $50.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 HARDY & HARPER INC SIDEWALK REPAIRS -OCT 0015554 45504 9,798.00 11/7/2013 1 105865 GABRIEL PEREZ PHOTO CONTEST WINNER 0014095 1 44000 1 100.00 $100.00 11/7/2013 146.88 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 105866 GABRIEL PEREZ PHOTO CONTEST WINNER 0014095 1 44000 1 100.00 $100.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 105867 GABRIEL PEREZ PHOTO CONTEST WINNER 0014095 1 44000 1 150.00 $150.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 105868 HARDY&HARPER INC SIDEWALK REPAIR-S/RAIN 0015554 45504 2,400.00 $12,198.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 HARDY & HARPER INC SIDEWALK REPAIRS -OCT 0015554 45504 9,798.00 11/7/2013 1 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 105869 LAURA HARLAK FACILITY REFUND -DBC 001 23002 1 350.00 $350.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 105870 HDS WHITE CAP CONST SUPPLY EQ -COMM SVCS .0015350 1 42353 1 591.61 $591.61 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 105871 LEW HERNDON P & R COMM -10/26 0015350 1 44100 1 45.00 $45.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 105872 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES SUPPLIES -COMM SVCS 0015350 41200 653.91 $1,106.29 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES SUPPLIES -DBC 0015333 41200 305.50 11/7/2013 1 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 SR EXCURSION -OCT HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES SUPPLIES-C/HALL 0014093 41200 146.88 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 105873 KRISTIN INGOGLIA PHOTO CONTEST WINNER 0014095 1 44000 1 50.00 $50.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 105874 INLAND EMPIRE MAGAZINE AD -DBC OCT2013 0014095 1 42115 1 995.00 $995.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 105875 INLAND EMPIRE STAGES SR EXCURSION -OCT 0015350 1 45310 1 1,260.00 $4,898.75 11/7/2013 Page 7 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 10/31/2013thru 11/13/2013 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct # Amount Total Check Amount Check Date 11/7/2013 105875... INLAND EMPIRE STAGES SR EXCURSION -OCT 13 0015350 45310 290.50 $4,898.75... 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 PHOTO CONTEST WINNER INLAND EMPIRE STAGES SR EXCURSIONS -AUG 2013 0015350 45310 720.00 $45.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 $50.00 INLAND EMPIRE STAGES TRANS -SR EXCURSION 1125350 45310 965.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 105880 INLAND EMPIRE STAGES TRANS -SR EXCURSION 1125350 45310 674.50 $45.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 150.00 INLAND EMPIRE STAGES TRANS -SR EXCURSION 1125350 45310 988.75 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 - 105876 PETER ISKANDER FACILITY REFUND-PANTERA 001 23002 1 50.00 $50.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 MOONLIGHT PRESS SUPPLIES -ENVELOPES 0015510 1 41200 148.80 11/7/2013 1 105877 JEREMY LEE PHOTO CONTEST WINNER 0014095 1 44000 1 100.00 $100.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 105878 JOSEPH LEE PHOTO CONTEST WINNER 0014095 1 44000 1 100.00 $100.06 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 MOONLIGHT PRESS SUPPLIES -ENVELOPES 0015510 1 41200 148.80 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1117/2013 1 105879 LIANA PINCHER T&T COMM -10/10 - 0015510 1 44100 1 45.00 $45.00 11/7/2013 $50.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 105880 BENNY HANG P & R COMM -10/26 0015350 1 44100 1 45.00 $45.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 105881 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE LEGALSVCS-HIR 0014020 1 44021 1 45.00 $348.80 $45.00 11/7/2013 1 MOONLIGHT PRESS SUPPLIES -ENVELOPES 0015510 1 41200 148.80 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 ERIK MUNOZ PHOTO CONTEST WINNER 11/7/2013 1 105882 KAI YIU MAN PHOTO CONTEST WINNER 0014095 1 44000 1 50.00 $50.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 105883 MARIAMEMPIN FACILITY REFUND -DBC 001 23002 1 150.00 $150.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 105884 KENNETH MOK T & T COMM -10/10 0015510 1 44100 1 45.00 $45.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 105885 MOONLIGHT PRESS SUPPLIES -ENVELOPES 0015210 41200 200.00 $348.80 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 MOONLIGHT PRESS SUPPLIES -ENVELOPES 0015510 1 41200 148.80 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 105886 AARON MORALES PHOTO CONTEST WINNER 0014095 1 44000 1 50.00 $50.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 105887 DAVID MORENO PHOTO CONTEST WINNER 0014095 1 44000 1 50.00 $50.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 105888 ERIK MUNOZ PHOTO CONTEST WINNER 0014095 1 44000 1 100.00 $100:00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 105889 ERIK MUNOZ PHOTO CONTEST WINNER 0014095 1 44000 1 50.00 $50.00 11/7/2013 1117/2013 1 105890 ERIK MUNOZ PHOTO CONTEST WINNER 1 0014095 1 44000 1 100.00 $100.00 11/7/2013 Page 8 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 10/31/2013thru 11/13/2013 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct # Amount Total Check Amount Check Date 11/7/2013 1 105914 TREMCO MAINT-HERITAGE PK 0015340 42210 640.00 $640.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 105915 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY SUPPLIES -DBC 0015333 1 41200 1 515.17 $515.17 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 105916 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES CROSSING GUARD SVCS -SEPT 0014411 45410 1 6,768.72 $13,537.44 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES CROSSING GUARD SVCS -SEPT 0014411 45410 6,768.72 - 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 105917 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC SPL EVENT INS-JUL-SEPT 13 001 23004 1 12,310.62 $12,310.62 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 PERS RETIREMENT FUND RETIRE CONTRIB-EE 001 21109 13,052.39 11/7/2013 1 105918 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION CDBG LOAN REPAYMENT 125 36700 1 10,000.00 $10,000.00 11/7/2013 257.56 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 105919 DIVERSIFIED PRINTERS - PRINT SVCS -CITY NEWS 0014095 1 44000 1 3,508.00 $3,508.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 105920 DMS CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEERS INC ENHANCEMNT PROD -GRAND 2505510 1 46420 1 18,850.00 $18,850.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 105921 JEFFREY HIROSE CONTRACT CLASS -FALL 0015350 1 45320 1 336.00 $336.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 105922 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER CONTRACT CLASS -SUMMER 0015350 1 45320 1 1,821.60 $1,821.60 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 105923 JAMES LOUIS KOMEN CONTRACT CLASS -FALL 0015350 1 45320 1 529.20 $529.20 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 105924 CONSTANCE J LILLIE CONTRACT CLASS -FALL 0015350 1 45320 1 432.60 $432.60 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 105925 MAGICAL STEPS ACADEMY CONTRACT CLASS -FALL 0015350 1 45320 1 748.80 $748.80 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 105926 PERS RETIREMENT FUND SURVIVOR BENEFIT 001 2110945.57 725.00 $13,355.52 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 PERS RETIREMENT FUND RETIRE CONTRIB-EE 001 21109 13,052.39 11!7/2013 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 11/08/13 -LOAN DEDUCTIONS PERS RETIREMENT FUND RETIRE CONTRIB-(PEPRA) 001 21109 257.56 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 105927 HEATHER SMITH CONTRACT CLASS -FALL 0015350 1 45320 1 489.60 $489.60 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 105928 THE SAUCE CREATIVE SERVICES DESIGN SVCS -DB LOGO 0014411 42361 725.00 $1,073.80 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 THE SAUCE CREATIVE SERVICES DESIGN SVCS -MAGNETS 0014411 42367 1 348.80 11!7/2013 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 105929 TRIFYTTSPORTS CONTRACTCLASS-FALL 0015350 1 45320 1 669.60 $669.60 11/7/2013 11!7/2013 105930 VANTAGEPOINTTRNSFRAGNTS-303248 11/08/13 -LOAN DEDUCTIONS 001 21108 1 2,256.68 $29,969.49 1 11/7/2013 Page 11 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 10/31/2013thru 11/13/2013 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct # Amount Total Check Amount Check Date 11/7/2013 1 105930... VANTAGEPOINTTRNSFRAGNTS-303248 11/08/13-P/RDEDCUTIONS 001 21108 1 27,712.81 $29,969.49...11/7/2013 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 105931 WESTCOASTMEDIA AD -DBC NOV 2013 0014095 42115 500.00 $1,000.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 WESTCOASTMEDIA AD-CONNECTDB NOV2013 0014095 42115 1 500.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 13 -PP 23 PAYROLLTRANSFER P/RTRANSFER-13/PP23 001 10200162,273.99 $185,246.78 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 PAYROLLTRANSFER P/RTRANSFER-13/PP 23 112 10200 5,617.02 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 PAYROLLTRANSFER P/RTRANSFER-13/PP 23 113 102005,993.14 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 PAYROLLTRANSFER P/RTRANSFER-13/PP 23 115 10200 10,753.36 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 PAYROLLTRANSFER P/RTRANSFER-13/PP 23 125 10200 609.27 11/7/2013 $964,464.20 Page 12 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 10/31/2013thru 11/13/2013 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct # Amount Total Check Amount Check Date 11/7/2013 105891 OFFICEMAX INC SUPPLIES-CMGR 0014030 41200 12.78 $1,358.67 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 105893 OFFICEMAX INC SUPPLIES-CMGR 0014030 41200 16.97 945.00111/7/20 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 OFFICEMAX INC SUPPLIES -FINANCE 0014050 41200 151.60 REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 45000 1 OFFICEMAX INC SUPPLIES -FINANCE 0014050 41200 22.84 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 OFFICEMAX INC SUPPLIES -GENERAL 0014090 41200 19.08 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 OFFICEMAX INC SUPPLIES -GENERAL 0014090 41200 332.01 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 OFFICEMAX INC SUPPLIES -GENERAL 0014090 41200 187.32 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 OFFICEMAX INC SUPPLIES -DBC 0015333 41200 105.76 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 OFFICEMAX INC SUPPLIES-H/R 0014060 41200 58.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 OFFICEMAX INC SUPPLIES -GENERAL 0014090 41200 70.95 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 OFFICEMAX INC SUPPLIES -GENERAL 0014090 41200 48.83 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 OFFICEMAX INC SUPPLIES -GENERAL 0014090 41200 23.98 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 OFFICEMAX INC - SUPPLIES -GENERAL - 0014090 41200 71.6811/7/2013 11/7/2013 OFFICEMAX INC SUPPLIES -DBC 0015333 41200 227.60 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 OFFICEMAX INC SUPPLIES -RECREATION 0015350 41200 9.27 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 105892 OLYMPIC STAFFING SERVICES TEMP SVCS -WK 9/30 0015510 1 44000 1 158.88 $158.88111/7/20 11/7/2013 1 105896 11/7/2013 1 105893 TED OWENS P & R COMM -10/26 0015350 1 44100 1 45.00 945.00111/7/20 11/7/2013 1 105894 ROBERTPEREZ FACILITY REFUND -HERITAGE 001 23002 1 200.00 $200.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 105895 PETERANTHONY PIRRITANO T & T COMM -10/10 0015510 1 44100 1 45.00 $45.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 105896 GERRY PLUNK PHOTO CONTEST WINNER 0014095 1 44000 1 50.00 $50.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 105897 DEANNA PRADA FACILITY REFUND-SYC CYN 001 23002 1 50.00 $50.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 105898 PUBLIC IDENTITY SUPPLIES -VET DAY CELEB 0015350 1 41200 1 638.05 $638.05111/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 105899 ROBERT RAMOS RECREATION REFUND 001 34780 1 84.00 $84.00111/7/201Y-] 11/7/2013 1 105900 REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE CONTRACT SVCS -OCT 2013 0014096 1 45000 1 1,000.00 $1,000.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 105901 DAVIDA ROBERTO P & R COMM -10/26 0015350 1 44100 1 45.00 $45.00 11/7/2013 Page 9 City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 10/31/2013thru 11/13/2013 Check Date Check Number Vendor Name Transaction Description Fund/ Dept Acct # Amount Total Check Amount Check Date 11/7/2013 1 105902 ALBERT ROMO FACILITY REFUND -DBC 001 23002 1 350.00 $350.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 CONSULTING SVCS-ENVIRONMN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS -DIST 39 1395539 42126 11/7/2013 1 105903 LINDSEY SIMMONS PHOTO CONTEST WINNER 0014095 1 44000 1 100.00 $100.00 11/7/2013 42126 4,453.63 BALJITTOOR 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 23002 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS -DIST 38 11/7/2013 1 105904 STEVE SIMMONS PHOTO CONTEST WINNER 0014095 1 44000 1 100.00 $100.00 11/7/2013 ELECT SVCS-TRFFC CONTROL 0015510 42126 185.07 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 105905 SIMPSON ADVERTISING INC DESIGN SVCS -CITY NEWS 0014095 1 44000 1 1,725.00 $1,725.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 105906 SMART&FINAL SUPPLIES -RECREATION 0015350 1 41200 1 160.82 $160.82 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 105907 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS-DIST41 1415541 42126 259.17 $9,878.52 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS -DIST 38 1385538 42126 564.14 11/7/2013 1 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 CONSULTING SVCS-ENVIRONMN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS -DIST 39 1395539 42126 426.60 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS -PARKS 0015340 42126 4,453.63 BALJITTOOR 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 23002 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS -DIST 38 1385538 42126 55.44 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS-TRFFC CONTROL 0015510 42126 185.07 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS-TRFFC CONTROL 0015510 42126 150.56 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS-TRFFC CONTROL 0015510 42126 2,557.48 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS-TRFFC CONTROL 0015510 42126 369.99 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS-TRFFC CONTROL 0015510 42126 787.01 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ELECT SVCS-TRFFC CONTROL 0015510 42126 69.43 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 105908 KRISHNAN SRIVIDYA FACILITY REFUND-PANTERA 001 23002 1 100.00 $100.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 THE SAUCE CREATIVE SERVICES PROGRAMS -VET DAY 0015350 42110 1 419.58 11/7/2013 1 105909 SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENTAL MNGMT COM CONSULTING SVCS-ENVIRONMN 1155515 44000 1 2,172.50 $2,172.50111/712013 11/7/2013 1059111 THE SAUCE CREATIVE SERVICES BANNERS -CRAFT FAIR 0015350 45300 495.95 $915.53 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 THE SAUCE CREATIVE SERVICES PROGRAMS -VET DAY 0015350 42110 1 419.58 11/7/2013 1 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 105911 TIME WARNER CABLE MODEM SVCS-NOV/DEC 0014010 1 42130 1 60.98 $60.98 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 1 105912 TKE ENGINEERING & PLANNING DESIGN SVCS -TRAILS 2505310 1 46415 1 2,306.00 $2,306.00 11/7/2013 11/7/2013 105913 BALJITTOOR FACILITY REFUND -DBC 001 23002 1 466.00 $466.00 11/7/2013 Page 10 Agenda # Meeting Date: TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: James DeStefano, City 6.4 11119113 TITLE: ACCEPTANCE OF WORK PERFOrMED BY GERONIMO CONCRETE, INC FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF PANTERA DOG PARK ADA IMPROVEMENTS; DIRECTION TO THE CITY CLERK TO FILE THE PROPER NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND TO RELEASE THE RETENTION THIRTY-FIVE DAYS AFTER THE RECORDATION DATE; AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF AN ADDITIONAL $9,500 OF CDBG FUNDS FOR CHANGE ORDER #1 WITH GERONIMO CONCRETE. RECOMMENDATION: Accept the work performed by Geronimo Concrete, Inc; direct the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion; authorize the release of the retention; and authorize the expenditure of an additional $9,500 of CDBG funds and an equivalent increase in the contract price with Geronimo Concrete, Inc, from $37,200 to $46,700. FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is $60,000 in CDBG funds appropriated in the 2013/14 for this project. The City Council also appropriated $15,720 from General Fund Reserves at the September 3, 2013 City Council meeting for costs not eligible for CDBG funding. Therefore, total funding for this project is $75,720. Total cost to complete the project is $54,376.38. Authorization for the expenditure of an additional $9,500 of CDBG funds for Geronimo Concrete's contract is needed for this project. Following is the breakdown of project costs: Project Costs: Construction Contractor (Original Contract) $ 37,200.00 Construction Change Order #1 $ 9,500.00 Geotechnical Plan Check / Inspection $ 6,200.00 Building & Safety Plan Check / Inspection $ 800.00 Plans & Specs Photocopies and Bid Release Ads $ 676.38 PROJECT COST TOTAL $ 54,376.38 BACKGROUND: The City Council awarded a contract in the amount of $37,200 to Geronimo Concrete, Inc on September 3, 2013 to construct ADA improvements at the Pantera Dog Park. This project provided for the construction of three ADA accessible walkways to the entry gates, plus a set of stairs that are not ADA accessible to the large dog park. Due to the need for additional imported soil, one Change Order in the amount of $9,500 was processed to complete this project. The amount of imported soil that was actually needed exceeded the estimate by 128.47 Cubic Yards. The Change Order in the amount of $9,500 reflects the increase in cost of imported soil that Geronimo Concrete incurred in completing the project. Total cost of the project, including Change Order #1 is $54,376.38. DISCUSSION: The majority of funding for this project, $39,200, is from CDBG. The remainder of the cost $15,176.38, is from the General Fund. The work was substantially completed on November 12, 2013 and is now ready to be accepted. PREPARED AND REVIEWED BY: Bo se Director of Community Services Attachment: Notice of Completion RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 21810 COPLEY DRIVE DIAMOND BAR CA 91765 ATTENTION: CITY CLERK NOTICE OF COMPLETION Notice pursuant to Civil Code Section 3093, must be filed within 10 days after completion. Notice is hereby given that: 1. The undersigned is the owner or corporate officer of the owner of the interest or estate staled below in the property hereinafter described: 2. The full name of the owner is City of Diamond But 3. The full address of the owner is 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond ButCA 91765 4. The nature of the interest or estate of the owner is; "Lessee" (If other8ian fee, emke"In fete and insert, for example., `purchaser under contract of,ncrhese,` or`lee,o' ) 5. The full names and full addresses of all persons, if any, who hold title with the undersigned as joint tenants or as tenants in common are: NAMES ADDRESSES 6. A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was completed on November 12. 2013 . The work done was: Construction of Pantera Dog Park ADA improvement Project 7. The name of the contractor, if any, for such work of improvement was Geronimo Concrete. Inc (Ifuocotametor for work of impmvementes a whole, insert none") (Date of Contract) 8. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Diamond Bar, County of Los Angeles, State of Calilmada, and is described as follows Pantera Park in Diamond But, CA 9. The street address of said property is 801 Pantera Drive, Diamond Bar. CA 91765 (Ifno street address Jr. been officially assigned, insert "cone") CITY OF DIAMOND BAR Dated: Verrifeation for Individual Owner Slgnattlre of ewner or coryorate off car o£owner named in paz¢graph 2 or his agent VERIFICATION 1, the undersigned, say: 1 am the City Manager the declarant of the foregoing (`resident or', "Mermger of," "A partner of," "Owner of," etc) notice of completion; I have read said notice of completion and know the contents thereof; the same is true of my own knowledge. I declare under penally of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on , 2013 at Diamond Bar , California. (Date of signature) (City where signed) (Persoml si,etmc ofthe individual who is swearing arta, contents of the notice efcompletion ere true) DO NOT RECORD REQUIREMENTS AS TO NOTICE OF COMPLETION A notice of completion must be filed for record WITHIN 10 DAYS after completion of the work of improvement (to be computed exclusive of the day of completion), as provided in Civil Code Section 3093. The "owner" who must file for record a notice of completion of a building or other work of improvement means the owner (or his successor in -interest at the date the notice is filed) on whose behalf the work was done, though his ownership is less than the fee title. For example, if A is the owner in fee, and B, lessee under a lease, causes a building to be constructed, then B, or whoever has succeeded to his interest at the date the notice is filed, must file the notice. If the ownership is in two or more persons as joint tenants or tenants in common, the notice may be signed by any one of the co-owners (in fact, the foregoing form is designed for giving of the notice by only one covenant), but the names and addresses of the other co-owners must be stated in paragraph 5 of the form. Note that any Notice of Completion signed by a successor in interest shall recite the names and addresses of his transferor or transferors. In paragraphs 3 and 5, the full address called for should include street number, city, county and state. As to paragraphs 6 and 7, this form should be used only where the notice of completion covers the work of improvement as a whole. If the notice is to be given only of completion of a particular contract, where the work of improvement is made pursuant to two or more original contracts, then this form must be modified as follows: (1) Strike the works "A work of improvement" from paragraph 6 and insert a general statement of the kind of work done or materials furnished pursuant to such contract (e.g., "The foundations for the improvement'); (2) Insert the name of the contractor under the particular contract in paragraph 7 In paragraph 7 of the notice, insert the name of the contractor for the work of improvement as a whole. No contractor's name need be given if there is no general contractor, e.g., on so-called "owner -builder jobs." In paragraph 8, insert the full legal description, not merely a street address or tax description. Refer to deed or policy of title insurance. If the space provided for description is not sufficient, a rider may be attached. In paragraph 9, show the street address, if any, assigned to the property by any competent public or governmental authority. CITY COUNCIL Agenda # 6.5 Meeting Date: 11/19113 AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Member of the City Council FROM: James DeStefano, City Man TITLE: AWARD OF CONTRACT TO CAL IFORNIA SURFACING FOR THE TENNIS AND BASKETBALL COURT RESURFACING AT HERITAGE, MAPLE HILL, PANTERA AND RONALD REAGAN PARKS IN THE AMOUNT OF $41,900, PLUS A CONTINGENCY OF $4,190 (10%) FOR A TOTAL AUTHORIZATION OF $46,090. RECOMMENDATION: Award contract. FINANCIAL IMPACT: $52,250 in funds from the General Fund are included in the 2013/14 FY Budget for this project. Total cost of project to resurface the courts, including the 10% contingency is $46,090. BACKGROUND: The City released a Request for Proposal to receive bids for the Tennis and Basketball Court Resurfacing- Heritage, Maple Hill, Pantera and Ronald Reagan Parks on October 16, 2013. Proposals were received from three (3) contractors. Bids ranged from a low of $41,900 to a high of $60,727. The responsive low bidder is California Surfacing. The bids received were as follows: Company Bid Amount 1. California Surfacing $41,900.00 2. Taylor Tennis Courts, Inc. $49,585.00 3. Zaino Tennis Courts, Inc. $60,727.00 Staff has verified the contractor's state license with the State of California and the license is active and clear. References have been checked for similar work completed and California Surfacing is qualified to complete the work required of this contract. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Award of Contract November 19, 2013 Start of Construction by January 6, 2014 Completion of Construction by March 1, 2014 DISCUSSION: This project includes tennis and basketball court resurfacing at Heritage, Maple Hill, Pantera and Ronald Reagan Parks. Signs will be posted at each of the facilities to notify the public of the construction schedule. PREPARED AND REVIEWED BY: f � Bob e Community Services Director Attachment: Agreement with California Surfacing dated November 19, 2013 AGREEMENT The following agreement is made and entered into, in duplicate, as of the date executed by the Mayor and attested to by the City Clerk, by and between, California Surfacinq hereinafter referred to as the "CONTRACTOR" and the City of Diamond Bar, California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY." WHEREAS, pursuant to Request For Proposals (R.F.P.), proposals were received, on the date specified in the R.F.P.; and WHEREAS, City did accept the proposal of CONTRACTOR and; WHEREAS, City has authorized the Mayor to execute a written contract with CONTRACTOR for furnishing labor, equipment and material for the Tennis and Basketball Court Resurfacing Heritage, Maple Hill, Pantera and Ronald Reagan Parks in the City of Diamond Bar. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, it is agreed 1. GENERAL SCOPE OF WORK: CONTRACTOR shall furnish all necessary labor, tools, materials, appliances, and equipment for and do the work for the in the City of Diamond Bar. The work to be performed in accordance with the R.F.P., dated October 16, 2013. 2. INCORPORATED DOCUMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED COMPLEMENTARY: The R.F.P. is incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof with like force and effect as if set forth in full herein. The R.F.P., CONTRACTOR'S Proposal dated October 29. 2013, together with this written agreement, shall constitute the contract between the parties. This contract is intended to require a complete and finished piece of work and anything necessary to complete the work properly and in accordance with the law and lawful governmental regulations shall be performed by the CONTRACTOR whether set out specifically in the contract or not. Should it be ascertained that any inconsistency exists between the aforesaid documents and this written agreement, the provisions of this written agreement shall control. 3. TERMS OF CONTRACT The CONTRACTOR agrees to complete assigned work by March 1, 2014. Agreement and unit prices shall remain in force, unless terminated sooner, until December 31, 2014. 4. INSURANCE: The CONTRACTOR shall not commence work under this contract until he has obtained all insurance required hereunder in a company or companies acceptable to City nor shall the CONTRACTOR allow any subcontractor to commence work on his subcontract until all insurance required of the subcontractor has been obtained. The CONTRACTOR shall take out and maintain at all times during the life of this contract the following policies of insurance: Workers' Compensation Insurance: Before beginning work, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish to the City a certificate of insurance as proof that he has taken out full workers' compensation insurance for all persons whom he may employ directly or through subcontractors in carrying out the work specified herein, in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Such insurance shall be maintained in full force and effect during the period covered by this contract. In accordance with the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code, every CONTRACTOR shall secure the payment of compensation to his employees. The CONTRACTOR, prior to commencing work, shall sign and file with the City a certification as follows: "I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of work of this contract." b. For all operations of the CONTRACTOR or any sub -contractor in performing the work provided for herein, insurance with the following minimum limits and coverage: 1) Public Liability - Bodily Injury (not auto) $500,000 each person; $1,000,000 each accident. 2) Public Liability - Property Damage (not auto) $250,000 each person; $500,000 aggregate. 3) CONTRACTOR'S Protective - Bodily Injury $500,000 each person; $1,000,000 each accident. 4) CONTRACTOR'S Protective - Property Damage $250,000 each accident; $500,000 aggregate. 5) Automobile - Bodily Injury $500,000 each person; $1,000,000 each accident. 6) Automobile - Property Damage $250,000 each accident. c. Each such policy of insurance provided for in paragraph b. shall: 1) Be issued by an insurance company approved in writing by City, which is admitted to do business in the State of California. 2) Name as additional insured the City of Diamond Bar, its officers, agents and employees, and any other parties specified in the bid documents to be so included; 3) Specify it acts as primary insurance and that no insurance held or owned by the designated additional insured shall be called upon to cover a loss under the policy; 4) Contain a clause substantially in the following words: "It is hereby understood and agreed that this policy may not be canceled nor the amount of the coverage thereof reduced until thirty (30) days after receipt by City of a written notice of such cancellation or reduction of coverage as evidenced by receipt of a registered letter." 5) Otherwise be in form satisfactory to the City. d. The policy of insurance provided for in subparagraph a. shall contain an endorsement which: 1) Waives all right of subrogation against all persons and entities specified in subparagraph 4.c.(2) hereof to be listed as additional insureds in the policy of insurance provided for in paragraph b. by reason of any claim arising out of or connected with the operations of CONTRACTOR or any subcontractor in performing the work provided for herein; 2) Provides it shall not be canceled or altered without thirty (30) days' written notice thereof given to City by registered mail. e. The CONTRACTOR shall, within ten (10) days from the date of the notice of award of the Contract, deliver to the City Manager or his designee the original policies of insurance required in paragraphs a. and b. hereof, or deliver to the City Manager or his designee a certificate of the insurance company, showing the issuance of such insurance, and the additional insured and other provisions required herein. 5. APPRENTICESHIP EMPLOYMENT: In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code, and in accordance with the regulations of the California Apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the performance of the work. The CONTRACTOR is required to make contribution to funds established for the administrative of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other CONTRACTOR'S on the public works site are making such contributions. The CONTRACTOR and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex -officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. 6. LEGAL HOURS OF WORK: Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract, and the CONTRACTOR and any sub -contractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The CONTRACTOR shall forfeit, as a penalty to City, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any sub- CONTRACTOR under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which the laborer, workman or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of the Labor Code. 7. TRAVEL AND SUBSISTENCE PAY: CONTRACTOR agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. 8. CONTRACTOR'S LIABILITY: The City of Diamond Bar and its officers, agents and employees ("Indemnitees") shall not be answerable or accountable in any manner for any loss or damage that may happen to the work or any part thereof, or for any of the materials or other things used or employed in performing the work; or for injury or damage to any person or persons, either workmen or employees of the CONTRACTOR, of his subcontractor's or the public, or for damage to adjoining or other property from any cause whatsoever arising out of or in connection with the performance of the work. The CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for any damage or injury to any person or property resulting from defects or obstructions or from any cause whatsoever. The CONTRACTOR will indemnify Indemnitees against and will hold and save Indemnitees harmless from any and all actions, claims, damages to persons or property, penalties, obligations or liabilities that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm, entity, corporation, political subdivision, or other organization arising out of or in connection with the work, operation, or activities of the CONTRACTOR, his agents, employees, subcontractors or invitees provided for herein, whether or not there is concurrent passive or active negligence on the part of City. In connection therewith: The CONTRACTOR will defend any action or actions filed in connection with any such claims, damages, penalties, obligations or liabilities and will pay all costs and expenses, including attorneys' fees incurred in connection therewith. The CONTRACTOR will promptly pay any judgment rendered against the CONTRACTOR or Indemnitees covering such claims, damages, penalties, obligations and liabilities arising out of or in connection with such work, operations or activities of the CONTRACTOR hereunder, and the CONTRACTOR agrees to save and hold the Indemnitees harmless therefrom. c. In the event Indemnitees are made a party to any action or proceeding filed or prosecuted against the CONTRACTOR for damages or other claims arising out of or in connection with the work, operation or activities hereunder, the CONTRACTOR agrees to pay to Indemnitees and any all costs and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in such action or proceeding together with reasonable attorneys' fees. So much of the money due to the CONTRACTOR under and by virtue of the contract as shall be considered necessary by City may be retained by City until disposition has been made of such actions or claims for damages as aforesaid. This indemnity provision shall survive the termination of the Agreement and is in addition to any other rights or remedies which Indemnitees may have under the law. This indemnity is effective without reference to the existence or applicability of any insurance coverages which may have been required under this Agreement or any additional insured endorsements which may extend to Indemnitees. CONTRACTOR, on behalf of itself and all parties claiming under or through it, hereby waives all rights of subrogation and contribution against the Indemnitees, while acting within the scope of their duties, from all claims, losses and liabilities arising our of or incident to activities or operations performed by or on behalf of the Indemnitor regardless of any prior, concurrent, or subsequent active or passive negligence by the Indemnitees. 9. NON-DISCRIMINATION: Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1735, no discrimination shall be made in the employment of persons in the work contemplated by this Agreement because of the race, color or religion of such person. A violation of this section exposes the CONTRACTOR to the penalties provided for in Labor Code Section 1735. 10. CONTRACT PRICE AND PAYMENT: City shall pay to the CONTRACTOR for furnishing all material and doing the prescribed work the unit prices set forth in the Price Schedule in accordance with CONTRACTOR'S Proposal dated October 29, 2013 in the amount of Forty -One Thousand Nine Hundred Dollars ($41,900.00 ). 11.ATTORNEY'S FEES: In the event that any action or proceeding is brought by either party to enforce any term of provision of this agreement, the prevailing party shall recover its reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred with respect thereto. 12.TERMINATION: This agreement may be terminated by the City, without cause, upon the giving of a written "Notice of Termination" to CONTRACTOR at least thirty (30) days prior to the date of termination specified in the notice. In the event of such termination, CONTRACTOR shall only be paid for services rendered and expenses necessarily incurred prior to the effective date of termination. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement with all the formalities required by law on the respective dates set forth opposite their signatures. State of California "CONTRACTOR'S" License No. 404352. Date M CONTRACTOR TITLE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA IN Date Jack Tanaka, Mayor ATTEST: 0 Date CONTRACTOR'S Business Phone Emergency Phone at which CONTRACTOR can be reached at any time Date Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY CITY COUNCIL TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council VIA: James DeStefano, City Agenda # 6.6 Meeting Date: November 19 2013 AGENDA REPORT TITLE: APPROPRIATE $15,000 FROM THE AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT FUND AND APPROVE CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO.1 WITH TRANSCORE FOR THE TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SUPPORT RECOMMENDATION: Appropriate and approve FINANCIAL IMPACT: For Fiscal Year 2013-2014, the Public Works Department budget included an appropriation of $20,000 for the Traffic Management System's Annual Software Maintenance and Support Services, which is funded entirely by Air Quality Improvement Funds. Due to the development of the Traffic Responsive Plan/System, an additional amount of $15,000 will be required for the remainder of this current fiscal year. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: To develop and implement the Traffic Responsive Plan/System, staff worked with TransCore on a time -and -material basis under the existing annual software maintenance agreement. The annual contract amount of $20,000 and the appropriation of an additional $15,000 will exceed the City Manager's contractual authority of $25,000. Therefore, the Public Works Department is requesting City Council approval of this Contract Amendment No. 1. TransCore will continue to provide on-going support services necessary to maintain application software, identify operational problems, and provide additional services such as equipment procurement and upgrades, as well as troubleshooting communications failures. PREPARED BY: Christian Malpica, Associate Engineer REVIEWE D id G. L u. Director of Public Works Date Prepared: November 13, 2013 Attachment: Amendment to the Annual Software Maintenance and Support Services Agreement AMENDMENT NO. 1 TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ANNUAL SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT SERVICES AGREEMENT This Amendment No.1 to the Traffic Management System Annual Software Maintenance and Support Services is made and entered into this 19th day of November, 2013 between the CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, a Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "CITY') and TransCore, ITS, LLC (hereinafter referred to as "VENDOR"). A. RECITALS: (i) The CITY has heretofore entered into an Agreement, with VENDOR to provide annual software maintenance and support services, which the Agreement was dated August 7, 2007. (ii) The VENDOR agreed to develop, configure, test, evaluate and implement the Traffic Responsive System on a time -and -material basis. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and VENDOR: Section 1: Section 1. A. Scope of Services of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: "A. Scope of Services. The nature and scope of the specific services to be performed by VENDOR are to develop, configure, test, evaluate and implement the Traffic Responsive System. Section 2: Section 3 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: "Compensation. CITY agrees to compensate VENDOR for work that VENDOR actually performs to the satisfaction of City. Payment will be made only after submission of proper invoices in the form specified by the CITY." Section 3: Each party to this Amendment No. 1 acknowledges that no representation by any party which is not embodied herein nor any other agreement, statement, or promise not contained in this Amendment No. 1 shall be valid and binding. Any modification of this Amendment No. 1 shall be effective only if it is in writing signed by the parties. Total payment to VENDOR pursuant to this Amendment shall not exceed fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000.00). IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 1 as of the day and year first set forth above: APPROVED AS TO FORM By: City Attorney ATTEST: CITY OF DIAMOND BAR Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk DATE: VENDOR TransCore, ITS, LLC Travis White Vice President Jack Tanaka, Mayor 2 CITY COUNCIL Agenda # 7.1 Meeting Date: November 19, 2013 AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members,qf the City Council VIA: James DeStefano, City Mana TITLE: Willow Heights—Vesting Tentativ Parcel Map No. 72295, Development Review and Tree Permit (Planning Case No. PL2013-229) PROPERTY OWNERS: Walnut Valley Unified School District ("WVUSD") and City of Diamond Bar ("City") APPLICANT: Lennar Homes of California, Inc. ("Lennar") 25 Enterprise, Suite 300, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 PROJECT LOCATION: Commonly referred to as "Site D," the subject property is comprised of approximately 30 acres located at the southeast corner of Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard (Los Angeles County Assessor's Parcel Numbers 8714-002-900, 8714-002-901, 8714-002-902, 8714-002-903 and 8714-015-001). RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 2013 -XX approving the Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295, associated Development Review and Tree Permit applications, and Addendum #1 to the Site D Specific Plan Final EIR (Planning Case No. PL2013-229), to authorize the development of 182 for -sale dwelling units and a 2.5 net acre neighborhood public park, and determining associated dispositions and acquisitions of property are in conformance with the General Plan, based on the findings of DBMC Sections 21.20.080, 22.22.150, 22.48.040, and 22.38.110, subject to conditions of approval as listed within the resolution. BACKGROUND/PROJECT SUMMARY: On February 21, 2012, following a four-year, highly publicized planning process, the City Council adopted the Site D Specific Plan (SDSP) a regulatory and policy document which provides the blueprint to guide the development of Site D. On that same date, the Council certified the Final Environmental Impact Report prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to evaluate, disclose and mitigate the environmental effects associated with the SDSP. Page 1 The SDSP—which was significantly shaped by public involvement in the planning process—provides for the development of up to 200 for -sale dwelling units, and requires at least two usable acres of land to be set aside and developed as a public neighborhood park. Lennar is currently in escrow to acquire Site D. Lennar proposes to implement the SDSP through the development of a new master - planned, gated residential community consisting of 182 for sale dwelling units, plus a 2.5 net -acre neighborhood park to be dedicated to the City. The proposed development will serve as a visual gateway into the City with its distinctive identity, incorporate a significant landmark entry feature near the corner of Diamond Bar Boulevard and Brea Canyon Road, and construct public right-of-way enhancements in accordance with the forthcoming Citywide Streetscape Design Standards currently being developed by staff. Although City Council's adoption of the SDSP nearly two years ago confers and vests the underlying land use rights to develop Site D in the manner proposed by Lennar, there are still project -specific entitlements that must be secured prior to recordation of saleable lots, and prior to the issuance of grading and building permits. These entitlements are as follows: 1. Vesting Tentative Tract Map to subdivide Site D into residential and public park parcels; 2. Development Review of the proposed architectural and landscape design elements associated with the proposed residential component of Site D; and 3. Tree Permit to remove 83 existing protected trees consisting of 75 Southern Black Walnuts, 6 Willows, and 2 Coast Live Oaks, and replace them at a 3:1 ratio with 75 Coast Live Oaks and 174 Sycamores, totaling 249 replacement trees to be planted on-site. In summary, the Site D Specific Plan established that Site D would be developed with up to 200 homes and a public park that provides at least two acres of usable open space. Lennar's submittal provides the project -level details for the build -out of Site D, and consists of 182 homes and a 2.5 net -acre neighborhood park. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A detailed description of the proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Development Review application and Tree Permit is provided in the attached Planning Commission staff report (Attachment 2). The Planning Commission staff report also provides a detailed analysis of how the three entitlement applications being considered by the City Council fully comply with the SDSP, the Development Code and the Diamond Bar Subdivision Ordinance, and provides the basis for the positive findings adopted by the Planning Commission in its Page 2 resolution (Attachment 3) recommending that the Council approve these entitlement applications. Copies of the Vesting Tentative Tract Map, preliminary grading plans, architectural plans, landscape plans, and conceptual park plans are included in the City Council packets under Attachment 7. A summary of the key land use components of the proposed development is provided below. Residential Development Lennar proposes to market the proposed development of Site D under the name "Willow Heights." Willow Heights will consist of three distinct neighborhoods, each defined by its own housing type: • Townhomes (62 units)—Traditional attached condominiums; • Cluster Homes (73 units)—Single-family detached condominiums; and • "60 x 70" Lots (47 units)—Traditional single-family homes on individual lots ranging from 4,200 to 7,867 square feet, with lot dimensions of 60 feet wide by 70 feet deep. Page 3 The entrance to Willow Heights will be aligned with Cherrydale Drive, and a traffic signal will be installed at the Diamond Bar Boulevard/Cherrydale intersection to provide safe and efficient ingress/egress for both the Willow Heights and Cherrydale Drive residents. Secondary, gated access will be provided at Pasado Drive for emergency and park maintenance access only; the vehicular gate will remain locked at all other times. Neighborhood Park The conceptual park plan below is derived from a community design charrette on January 16, 2013, during which Lennar solicited input from the surrounding residents regarding park design features and amenities. �i V The park site consists of 4.3 gross acres, including slopes and other non -accessible areas. The net usable area (paths, playgrounds, picnic and seating areas, etc.) is 2.5 acres. A key feature of the park design is "Rain Garden," which serves a dual purpose as an interpretive wetland feature, as well as a stormwater collection facility. The basins within the Rain Garden are designed to detain rainwater runoff until the water can be discharged into the Brea Canyon Channel through natural drainage processes. The Rain Garden will feature interpretive panels to educate park visitors about its water quality function, and will be landscaped with native and wetland habitat features. Opportunities for walking trails, shade structures and benches within the Rain Garden are provided in the conceptual park plan. Page 4 A feature not illustrated in the conceptual park plan above is the option to construct a small parking lot at the northwest edge of the park, with right-in/right-out access from Brea Canyon Road. The graphic below depicts where the driveway would be located based on line -of -sight and roadway geometrics analyses, although the precise layout of the parking lot would be integrated into the final park design plans. Traffic Improvements The Final EIR for the SDSP identified the mitigation measures that must be implemented in conjunction with the development of Site D. These mitigation measures consist of both roadway improvements adjacent to the project site to be completed by the developer prior to completion of construction, as well as monetary contributions to be applied toward citywide traffic improvements. An updated traffic impact analysis was prepared as part of the Willow Heights application submittal to address minor adjustments to the project's fair -share contributions resulting from the reduced unit count (200 units approved vs. 182 units proposed). As previously addressed in the Final EIR, although the development of Site D will add vehicle trips to the City's roadway network, the improvements to the intersection of Diamond Bar Boulevard and Brea Canyon Road will actually result in improved levels of service at this intersection. The traffic mitigation measures originally prescribed in the Final EIR are summarized below. The aerial exhibit that follows identifies where project -specific traffic improvements will be constructed. • Traffic Improvements on Brea Canyon Road at Diamond Bar Boulevard: 1) Widen and restripe northbound Brea Canyon Road to provide a second dedicated right -turn lane; 2) Widen and restripe the eastbound departure on Diamond Bar Boulevard to provide a third through lane along the project frontage; 3) Modify the existing median and restripe the westbound approach on Diamond Bar Boulevard to provide a Page 5 second left -turn lane; 4) Maintain the existing bike lane on Diamond Bar Boulevard along the entire project frontage; and 5) Traffic signal improvements. • Traffic Improvements on Cherrydale Drive at Diamond Bar Boulevard: 1) Provide an option left/through lane and a separate right -turn lane on the northbound approach; 2) Restripe southbound approach to provide an option left/through/right-turn lane on Cherrydale; 3) Widen eastbound approach to provide a third through lane along the project frontage; 4) Widen the eastbound approach to provide a separate right -turn lane; 5) Modify median and restripe Diamond Bar Boulevard to provide a single westbound left -turn lane; 6) Install traffic signal; and 7) Maintain the existing bike lane on Diamond Bar Boulevard along the entire project frontage. The implementation of this improvement may require some modification to existing signing and striping to affected streets. • The applicant will also be required to pay fair -share fees of the construction costs to implement additional improvements to mitigate the cumulative traffic impacts of existing traffic, future non -project traffic, and project traffic. Page 6 Tree Permit As required under the City's Tree Preservation and Protection ordinance, as well as the Final EIR's mitigation measures, any protected tree that is removed to accommodate development, shall be replaced with protected tree species at a 3:1 ratio'. To mitigate the removal of 83 existing protected trees consisting of Southern Black Walnuts, Willows and Coast Live Oak trees, the applicant is required to replace them at a 3:1 ratio with 75 Coast Live Oaks and 174 Sycamores, totaling 249 replacement trees to be planted on-site. Sycamore trees are also a protected species in the City's Tree Preservation and Protection Ordinance. The applicant is proposing to replant Sycamores instead of Southern Black Walnut trees because Southern Black Walnuts have a tendency to have a weak branching structure and are prone to splitting. In addition, Southern Black Walnut nursery stock is very limited. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION On October 8, 2013, the Planning Commission reviewed the Willow Heights plans and recommended by a 5-0 vote that the City Council approve the project as submitted. The Planning Commission staff report is attached (Attachment 2). Approximately 80 attendees were in the audience for this meeting, and 14 residents and property owners spoke in near -unanimous opposition to the project. Since the underlying land use rights (i.e., up to 200 residences, subject to dedication of a 2 -acre park) were already vested under the SDSP, the only matter for the Planning Commission's consideration was the design of the project (e.g., tract layout, architecture, landscaping), objections were nonetheless expressed regarding traffic impacts, the removal of trees and habitat, and other factors related to development. Several speakers also stated that they were not informed about the Site D Specific Plan prior to receiving the public hearing notices for the proposed Willow Heights project. A detailed summary of the public testimony is provided in the attached Planning Commission minutes (Attachment 2). See also Attachment 5 for a detailed chronology summarizing the extensive public notification and participation throughout the SDSP process. After questioning staff, the applicant, and the applicant's civil and traffic engineers about various project -specific issues raised during the hearing, the Planning Commission adopted a resolution recommending that the City Council approve the proposed entitlements based on findings concluding that the project is in substantial conformance with the SDSP (Attachment 3). 'Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.38.030 defines a protected tree as a native oak, walnut, sycamore or willow with a trunk diameter of 8 inches or more at chest height. Page 7 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: Public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 1,000 -foot radius of the project site on November 1, 2013, all speakers who testified at the October 8, 2013 Planning Commission meeting, and all speakers who have previously attended the Planning Commission and City Council hearings on the SDSP and community workshops. The notice was also published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin and San Gabriel Valley Tribune newspapers on November 8, 2013. The project site was posted with a notice display board, and a copy of the public notice was posted at the City's three designated community posting sites. Information regarding the proposed development was also posted on the City's website. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City certified the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the SDSP on February 21, 2012. The FEIR analyzed the potential environmental impacts resulting from the SDSP's approval from both a programmatic and project -level perspective, analyzing the development of the project site for residential and recreational uses with accompanying on-site and off-site infrastructure improvements. With the submittal of a project -specific application, an Addendum to the FEIR has been prepared, which includes minor technical changes and additions in order to determine the project's consistency with the SDSP. An updated traffic report was prepared in conjunction with the Addendum to address project -specific refinements to the original traffic impact analysis (Attachment 6). The proposed project is in substantial conformance with the SDSP and the attached Addendum to the FEIR (Attachment 4) documents that no new environmental issues has been identified and states the reasons to support the findings that the proposed project would not have any potentially significant impacts on the environment with the proposed mitigation measures included. A mitigation reporting and monitoring program (MRMP) has been prepared, which address site-specific conditions for the project. The purpose of the MRMP is to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures. The program also identifies the timing and responsibility for monitoring each measure and is attached as an exhibit to the Addendum and Resolution (Attachment 1). The project is conditioned to include these mitigation measures as part of project approval. ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION In addition to staff's recommendation, the following alternatives have been identified: 1. Continue the item for additional information: or a Deny the Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Development Review, and Tree Permit, specifically identifying the reasons the required findings of DBMC Sections 21.20.080, 22.22.150, 22.48.040, and 22.38.110 cannot be made. Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution (Attachment 1) to approve the Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Development Review, and Tree Permit for Planning Case No. PL2013-229, to allow the subdivision for the development of 182 for - sale dwelling units and a 2.5 net -acre neighborhood public park, based on the findings of DBMC Sections 21.20.080, 22.22.150, 22.48.040, and 22.38.110, subject to conditions of approval as listed within the draft resolution. Prepared by: 4Grac S. Lee Senior Planner Reviewed by: David Doyle Assistant City Manager Attachments: Reviewed by: Greg Gubman, AICP Community Development Director 1. Draft CC Resolution No. 2013 -XX and Standard Conditions of Approval 2. Planning Commission Staff Report and Minutes dated October 8, 2013 3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-23 4. Addendum to Site D Specific Plan Final EIR 5. Chronology of Public Notification Process for the SDSP 6. Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Conceptual Grading, Architectural, Landscape and Conceptual Park Plan Page 9 Attachment 1 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -XX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 72295, ASSOCIATED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND TREE PERMIT APPLICATIONS, AND ADDENDUM #1 TO THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE SITE D SPECIFIC PLAN (PLANNING CASE NO. PL2013-229) TO AUTHORIZE THE DEVELOPMENT OF 182 RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND A 2.5 NET ACRE NEIGHBORHOOD PUBLIC PARK AT THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF BREA CANYON ROAD AND DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD, DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 (ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 8714-002-900, 8714- 002-901, 8714-002-902, 8714-002-903 AND 8714-015-001) AND DETERMINING ASSOCIATED CONTEMPLATED DISPOSITIONS AND ACQUISTIONS OF PROPERTY ARE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN. A. RECITALS 1. The Subject Property is currently comprised of five parcels totaling 30 acres (Assessor's Parcel Numbers are 8714-002-900, 8714-002-901, 8714-002-902, 8714-002-903, and 8714-015-001). The Walnut Valley Unified School District owns approximately 29 acres, and the City of Diamond Bar owns a 0.98 acre strip of land along Brea Canyon Road, east of the Brea Canyon Flood Control Channel. A 0.67 acre segment of a flood control channel, owned and maintained by the Los Angeles County Flood Control District, separates the City and School District properties. The Subject Property is located in the Site D Specific Plan zone with a General Plan land use designation of Specific Plan located at the southeast corner of Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard, Diamond Bar, Los Angeles County, California ("Project Site"). 2. On February 21, 2012, the Diamond Bar City Council approved the Site D Specific Plan (SDSP), which set forth regulatory criteria to guide the development of the vacant, undeveloped 30 -acre Site D Project area. The SDSP provides for the development of up to 200 for -sale dwelling units, and requires at least two acres to be set aside and developed as a public neighborhood park. In conjunction with approval of the SDSP, on February 21, 2012, the Diamond Bar City Council certified "Final Environmental Impact Report — 'Site D' Specific Plan, SCH No. 2008021014" (FEIR), and adopted "Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Consideration" for each of the significant environmental impacts identified in the FEIR and each of the alternatives presented therein. From both a programmatic and project -level perspective, the FEIR analyzed the potential environmental impacts resulting from the SDSP's approval; the development of the Project Site for residential, recreational, and open space uses; the construction of housing, a recreational facility, and accompanying on-site and off-site infrastructure improvements; the occupancy of that housing and the public use of the recreational facility; and the on-going operation, habitation, use, and maintenance of the Project Site. Further, the FEIR envisioned not only the adoption of the SDSP and the land - use entitlements associated therewith, but also the subsequent development of the "Site D" property in a manner generally consistent with the SDSP. 3. The Applicant, Lennar Homes of California, Inc., filed an application for the following entitlements: (1) Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295 to subdivide an existing vacant 30 -acre lot into 63 lots for the development of 182 for -sale dwelling units and a 2.5 net usable acre neighborhood public park; (2) Development Review of the proposed architectural and landscape design elements associated with the proposed residential component of Site D; and (3) Tree Permit to remove 83 existing protected trees consisting of 75 Southern Black Walnuts, 6 Willows, and 2 Coast Live Oaks, and replace them at a 3:1 ratio with 75 Coast Live Oaks and 174 Sycamores, totaling 249 replacement trees to be planted on-site. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Development Review, and Tree Permit shall be collectively referred to as the 'Project." 4. In conjunction with the Project, it is contemplated (a) that the Walnut Valley Unified School District and the City of Diamond Bar will transfer their respective interests in the Project Site to the Applicant, or its successor or assign, and (2) that the City will accept dedication of a maximum of 4.3 acres of property (designated as Lots 62 and 63 on Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295) for public park purposes from Applicant or its successor or assign. Government Code Section 65402 provides that if there is an applicable general plan, no real property shall be acquired by dedication or otherwise for street, square, park or other public purposes, and no real property shall be disposed of, until the location, purpose and extent of such acquisition or disposition have been reported upon by the planning agency as to conformity with the general plan. 5. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) has been prepared for the Project, which concludes that the Project is in substantial conformance with the SDSP and that no new environmental issues have been identified that would have any potentially significant impacts on the environment with the proposed mitigation measures included. 6. The City Council has independently considered the Addendum, along with the FEIR, and finds, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 21166, that no further environmental documentation is required due to the following reasons: 1) substantial changes are not proposed in the Project which will require major revisions of the FEIR, 2) substantial changes did not occur with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is being undertaken which will require major revisions in the FEIR, and 3) there is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the FEIR was certified as complete, showing that: (a) the Project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the FEIR; (b) significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the FEIR; (c) mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the Project, but the mitigation measures or alternatives have not been adopted; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives considerably different from those analyzed in the FEIR would substantially reduce one or more significant 2 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX effects on the environment, but the mitigation measures or alternatives have not been adopted. 7. On November 8, 2013, notification of the public hearing for this Project was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers. Public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 1,000 -foot radius of the Project Site, and to all speakers who have previously attended the Planning Commission and City Council hearing on the SDSP and community workshops. The public notices were posted at the City's designated community posting sites on November 8, 2013. In addition to the published and mailed notices, the Project Site was posted with a display board. 8. On October 8, 2013, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing, solicited testimony from all interested individuals, and concluded said hearing on that date. 9. On November 19, 2013, the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing, solicited testimony from all interested individuals, and concluded said hearing on that date. 10. The documents and materials constituting the administrative record of the proceedings upon which the City's decision is based are located at the City of Diamond Bar, Community Development Department, Planning Division, 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765. B. RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: 1. That all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein and as prescribed under Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Sections 21.20.080, 22.22, 22.48, and 22.30.050, this City Council hereby finds and approves as follows: Tentative Map Findings: Pursuant to Subdivision Code Section 21.20.080 of the City's Subdivision Ordinance, the City Council hereby makes the following findings: 1. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the general plan and any applicable specific plan: The Project is a new master -planned gated residential community consisting of 182 for -sale dwelling units within three distinct neighborhood settings, as well as a 2.5 net usable acre neighborhood public park to be dedicated to the City. The Project is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Specific Plan as well as the Site D Specific Plan in terms of land use, and the design and appearance of the Project is compatible with the surrounding community. 3 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX The Project is consistent with the General Plan and Site D Specific Plan as follows: • Quality Housing. The Project contributes to the diversity of the City's housing stock with an attractive housing development accommodating people of diverse ages, cultures, occupations and levels of financial status; and will serve as a visual gateway into the City with its distinctive identity. • Buffer from existing homes. The Project is designed to minimize the negative impacts on the surrounding homes. A transition between the development and adjacent homes is achieved through 30 -foot wide landscaped setbacks around the entire site. The setbacks will be densely planted and maintained with Oak and Sycamore trees, and shrubs in order to provide a buffer between the Project and the existing residences along Ambushers Street, Pasado Drive, and Cold Springs Lane. • View Impacts from Neighboring Homes. The Project is designed to create a minimal visual impact to the adjacent homes by building the new dwellings downhill on lower pad levels than the existing homes in the vicinity in order to retain view corridors. • Neighborhood Public Park. The Project creates a community environment which nurtures social and recreational opportunities for its residents. The conceptual park plan is derived from a community consensus design produced during a neighborhood design charette. As a requirement of the SDSP, Lennar solicited input from the residents on the design and types of amenities they would like to see incorporated into the future neighborhood park. The participants were generally supportive of the proposed park layout, and there was consensus regarding the types and locations for a number of amenities and features. • Entry Feature. The Project offers an aesthetically pleasing development incorporating community identity through a significant landmark entry feature at the corner of Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard to mark the entrance into the City. • Public Streetscape Improvements: Landscaped parkways with street trees, sidewalks, and bike trails will be required along Diamond Bar Boulevard, and the Project will conditioned to comply with Citywide Streetscape Design Standards currently being developed as part of the Grand Avenue Beautification Plan. 2. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development: The Project will be consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Specific Plan and the zoning designation of Site D Specific Plan, which allows for the development of up to 200 for -sale dwelling units and minimum two acre usable neighborhood public park. The Project Site is located within an urbanized area adequately served by existing roadways and infrastructure. The 4_ City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX Project will not cause any intersections or street segments in the vicinity to operate at unacceptable level of service with the mitigation measures and improvements required as part of the Project approval. Therefore the property is physically able to accommodate the Project. 3. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or injure fish or wildlife or their habitat: In order to demonstrate compliance with applicable state and federal resource protection policies designed to protect or compensate for the loss of biological resources, the following mitigation measures are part of the Project approval and were adopted as part of the Site D Specific Plan approval. • The applicant is required to demonstrate receipt of any discretionary permits and approval as may be required from the Unites States Army Corps of Engineers and Regional Water Quality Control Board (ACOE/RWQCB) and California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and commit to the provision of compensatory jurisdictional resources meeting or exceeding the following minimal standards: (1) the on-site and/or off-site replacement of CDFW jurisdictional waters and wetlands at a 2:1 ratio; (2) the on-site and/or off-site replacement of CDFW jurisdictional streambed and associated riparian habitat at a 2:1 ratio; and (3) the incorporation of design features into the Project's design and development enhancing the site's biological resources. • Measures to mitigate impacts to California walnut woodland will be orchestrated in concert with the replanting of trees protected by the City's tree preservation and protection ordinance. Prior to final approval of a grading permit or initiation of any activity that involves the removal/disturbance of oak and walnut woodland habitat, the applicant shall develop a detailed tree mitigation plan describing the number, size, and location of compensatory trees to be planted and outline success criteria and adaptive management procedures to ensure that the mitigation plan is successful, and submit the plan to the City for review and approval. Mitigation shall include a minimum replacement ratio of 3:1, totaling 249 replacement trees to be planted on-site. • As determined feasible by the Community Development Director, initial vegetation removal activities shall be conducted outside the nesting season (February 15 -August 15) to avoid impacts upon nesting birds. If initial vegetation removal activities occur during the nesting season, prior to the commencement of any grading or grubbing activities, all suitable habitat shall first be thoroughly surveyed by a qualified biologist for the presence of nesting birds. If any active nests are detected, a buffer of at least 300 feet (500 feet for raptors) shall be delineated, flagged, and vegetation removal activities avoided therein until the nesting cycle is complete, as determined by the surveying biologist or a qualified biological monitor. 5_ City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX 4. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements will not cause serious public health or safety problems: The proposed subdivision or type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health or safety problems because the site has been designed to comply with the minimum factors of safety by establishing grades that meet certain elevation targets. The site was designed to build the southeastern portion of the site (detached single-family lot pads) at a higher elevation. The design to build up the building pads along the southeastern portion of the site also stabilizes the slopes of the existing homes abutting the site. Grading of the Project Site will be conducted in accordance with the recommendations outlined in the Project's geotechnical investigation so as to assure that geotechnical stability is maintained or increased. The on-site circulation and access to the site will not result in unsafe driving conditions. Site access has been analyzed by a traffic engineer and fair -share traffic improvement requirements have been set forth. Ingress and egress to the site has been carefully designed. The internal private street configuration, widths, and circulation are sufficient, which has been reviewed and approved by the County of Los Angeles Fire Department. The interior roadway layout is primarily guided by the organization of land uses within the subdivision, as well as site-specific topographic and geotechnical factors. The site was designed to build the southeastern portion of the site at a higher elevation, which resulted in the curvature of the private streets. 5. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision: There are currently no public easements within Site D; therefore, the Project will not impede any preexisting public access rights. 6. The discharge of sewage from the proposed subdivision into the community sewer system would not result in violation of existing requirements prescribed by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board: The applicant shall construct a sanitary sewer system in accordance with the City, Los Angeles County Public Works Department, and County Sanitation District Standards prior to building occupancy. A condition of project approval requires a fair share payment in the amount of $78,081.60 (based on a 15% impact to the Emergency Storage Capacity at the Castle Rock Pump Station as indicated in the Sewer and Water System Analysis dated September 24, 2013) and $29,438.71 (based on a 3.6% impact to the Emergency Storage Capacity at the Fountain Springs Pump Station as indicated in the Sewer and Water System Analysis dated September 24, 2013), to be accepted by the City prior to the issuance of the final sewer inspection sign off and sewer improvement bond release. The proposed subdivision has been analyzed under the Addendum to the FOR and found not to violate any requirement of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. 6- - City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX 7. A preliminary soils report or geologic hazard report does not indicate adverse soil or geologic conditions: The grading of the Project Site will be constructed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the recommendations contained in the preliminary geotechnical investigation to assure that geotechnical stability is maintained or increased. 8. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable provisions of the City's subdivision ordinance, the development code, and the subdivision map act: Conformity with the applicable provisions of the Subdivision Map Act, Subdivision Code and Development Code was verified by the City during the technical review of the Project. Any inconsistencies during the review process were corrected prior to the City deeming the Project complete and placing the matter on the Planning Commission public hearing agenda. Moreover, the Project is in substantial conformance with the Site D Specific Plan, Hillside Management Objectives (DBMC Section 22.22) 1. Natural topographic features and appearances are preserved by means of landform grading so as to blend man-made or manufactured slopes into the natural topography: The fundamental shaping of the property will be graded to be consistent with the existing topography. The existing profile of the property will be mimicked and the slopes bordering Diamond Bar Boulevard and the large slopes on the southern end of the property will add to a backdrop to the development. However, to achieve a balanced site, the areas on the northern portion of the property will be at lower elevation than the southeast portion of the property. The southeastern portion of the site will be built on a higher elevation, which results in the curvature of the private streets and two 16 -foot high retaining walls to separate the two main building pads. All finished slopes will be no greater than 50 percent (2:1). 2. The preservation of Natural topographic features and appearances are preserved through restrictions on successive padding and terracing of building sites: The site grading was designed around geotechnical constraints of the site. There are two main building pads proposed: 1) townhome and detached -single family condo neighborhoods; and 2) detached single-family neighborhood. These two main pads are located on different elevation levels, separated by two 16 -foot high Verdura walls. The detached single-family lots are created at a higher elevation towards the southeast portion of the site with the private street climbing to the east and south into the individual single family lots. The lower 7 - City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX pad consists of two tiers, with the townhomes on the lower tier and the single- family detached condos on the upper tier. 3. Major natural topographic features, drainage courses, steep slopes, watershed areas, vernal pools, view corridors, and scenic vistas are retained: The Project is designed to create minimal visual impact to the adjacent homes by building the new dwellings downhill on a lower pad level than the existing homes in the vicinity in order to retain view corridors. The buildings are located in a manner that preserves the views and is kept as low as possible to reduce or eliminate the possibility of blocking views of existing residences. 4. The preservation and enhancement of prominent landmark features, significant ridgelines, natural rock outcroppings, protected trees and woodlands (chapter 22.38, Tree Preservation and Protection), and other areas of special natural beauty: There are no ridgelines or rock outcroppings within the subject property. The applicant will replant 249 native Oak and Sycamore trees to mitigate the removal of 83 existing protected trees. In addition, the Project is required to incorporate a significant landmark entry feature near the corner of Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard to mark the key entrance into the City. The design of this feature will seek to visually draw from elements of the community and/or history of the City. The removal of the riparian features within the Subject Property was addressed in the Final EIR and will be mitigated accordingly. 5. The utilization of varying setbacks, building heights, foundation designs and compatible building forms, materials, and colors which serve to blend buildings into the terrain: The Project consists of three distinct neighborhoods, each defined by its own housing type on different building elevations/pads. Each housing type has varied architectural building details, finishes and treatment on the elevations, and there is diversity between the units from street view. Earth tone building materials and color schemes are used that blend in with the natural landscape, and landscaping is used to screen view of down slope building elevations, and slopes are planted with informal clusters of trees and shrubs to soften and vary the slope plane. 6. The utilization of clustered sites and buildings on more gently sloping terrain so as to reduce grading alterations on steeper slopes; The entire site will be graded and recontoured to accommodate the Project. The Project consists of three distinct neighborhoods on different elevations/pads. The lower pad consists of two tiers, with the townhomes on the lower tier and the single-family detached condos on the upper tier. The detached single-family lots are created at a higher elevation towards the southeast portion of the site. 8 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX 7. The utilization of building designs, locations, and arrangements which serve to avoid a continuous intrusive skyline effect and which afford view privacy and protection; The Project will retain views by creating building pads that remain below existing developed sites, maintaining substantial separations between existing and new structures, and limiting the building heights to 35 feet or less, as well as screen for privacy where appropriate, with heavily landscaped slopes along the site's easterly and southern boundaries. 8. The preservation and introduction of plant materials so as to protect slopes from soil erosion and slippage and minimize the visual effects of grading and construction of hillside areas: There are 30 -foot landscaped setbacks that provide screening and buffering around the site's boundaries. A dense stand of Sycamore and Oak trees—to replace the Walnuts and Oaks removed as part of the Project—is proposed to be planted within the large slopes abutting the existing residences. 9. The utilization of street designs and improvements which serve to minimize grading alterations and harmonize with the natural contours and character of the hillsides: The interior roadway layout is primarily guided by the organization of land uses within the subdivision, as well as site-specific topographic and geotechnical factors. Due to ancient landslides, the site was designed to build the southeastern portion of the site at a higher elevation, which resulted in the curvature of the private streets and two 16 -foot high retaining walls to separate the two main building pads. The design to build up the building pads along the southeastern portion of the site also stabilizes the slopes of the existing homes abutting the site. Development Review Findings (DBMC Section 22.48) 1. The design and layout of the proposed development are consistent with the general plan, development standards of the applicable district, design guidelines, and architectural criteria for special areas (e.g., theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards or planned developments): The Project is designed pursuant to the development standards and design guidelines contained in the Site D Specific Plan and incorporates the following features: • Green, Sustainable Development: Provides a green and sustainability model requirement looking at energy efficiency, healthy indoor air quality, waste reduction, water efficiency, use of renewable and recyclable materials for building construction, etc. In addition, landscape irrigation will be designed for future reclaimed water connection. 9 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX • Building Setbacks: The buildings will have 30 -foot setbacks from Diamond Bar Boulevard and along the perimeter of the Project Site. The building elevations along street view are articulated and diversified. • Landscaped Setbacks: There are 30 -foot landscaped setbacks that will provide screening and buffering around the site's boundaries. A dense stand of Sycamore and Oak trees—to replace the Walnuts and Oaks removed as part of the Project—is proposed to be planted within the large slopes abutting the existing residences. • Retaining Walls: Three-foot high, integral color split -face retaining walls will be constructed along Diamond Bar Boulevard with hedges to cover the face of the walls in order to soften its visual appearance. Two 16 -foot high Verdura walls will also be constructed as retaining walls, which are filled with suitable backfill and live vegetation planted in the individual cells. Flowering evergreen vines will be planted at the top of the slope to provide for cascading plantings to further landscape the wall. • Fences and Walls: Three styles of decorative, privacy, and security walls are proposed: 1) plastered masonry block walls located in the vicinity of the entry gate, 2) wrought iron fences behind the rear yards of the detached single-family condos along Diamond Bar Boulevard, and 3) vinyl fences in the side yards of each unit. • Private Internal Streetscape Requirements: There will be canopy trees such as Brisbane Box and Crape Myrtle trees planted along the private internal streets. Special landscape treatment and decorative textured pavement will be provided at the intersection of Cherrydale and the shared main driveway. 2. The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards: The Project will not interfere with the use or enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments because the Project is designed to minimize the negative impacts on the surrounding homes. A transition between the Project and adjacent homes is achieved through 30 -foot wide landscaped setbacks around the entire site. A dense stand of Sycamore and Oak trees is proposed to be planted within the large slopes abutting the existing residences. Therefore a landscaping buffer will be maintained in order to provide some distance from existing residences along Ambusher Street, Pasado Drive, and Cold Springs Lane. In addition, the Project is designed to create a minimal visual impact to the adjacent homes by building the new dwellings downhill on a lower pad level than the existing homes in the vicinity in order to retain view corridors. The Project will not interfere with vehicular or pedestrian movements, such as access or other functional requirements. A traffic analysis report concluded that the proposed Project will not cause any intersections or street segments in the vicinity to operate at an unacceptable level of service with the mitigation 10 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX measures and improvements required as part of Project approval. The existing roadways will be improved as part of the Project. 3. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain and enhance the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by this chapter, the general plan, or any applicable specific plan: The Project is designed to be compatible and complementary to the neighborhood, and conforms to the SDSP as well as incorporates the principles of the City's Residential Design Guidelines as follows: • Quality Housing. The Project contributes to the diversity of the City's housing stock with an attractive housing development accommodating people of all ages, cultures, occupations and levels of financial status; and will serve as a visual gateway into the City with its distinctive identity. • Buffer from existing homes. The Project is designed to minimize the negative impacts on the surrounding homes. A transition between the Project and adjacent homes is achieved through 30 -foot wide landscaped setbacks around the entire site. A dense stand of Sycamore and Oak trees is proposed to be planted within the large slopes abutting the existing residences. Therefore a landscaping buffer will be maintained in order to provide some distance from existing residences along Ambusher Street, Pasado Drive, and Cold Springs Lane. • View Impacts from Neighboring Homes. The Project is designed to create a minimal visual impact to the adjacent homes by building the new dwellings downhill on a lower pad level than the existing homes in the vicinity in order to retain view corridors. • Neighborhood Public Park. The Project creates a community environment which nurtures social and recreational opportunities for its residents. The conceptual park plan is derived from the community consensus design. As a requirement of the SDSP, Lennar solicited input from the residents on the design and types of amenities they would like to see incorporated into the future neighborhood park. The participants were generally supportive of the proposed park layout, and there was consensus regarding the types and locations for a number of amenities and features. • Entry Feature. The Project offers an aesthetically pleasing development incorporating community identity through a significant landmark entry feature at the corner of Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard to mark the entrance into the City. • Public Streetscape Improvements: Landscaped parkways with street trees, sidewalks, and bike trails will be required along Diamond Bar Boulevard; and the Project will conditioned to comply with the streetscape designs in the Grand Avenue Beautification Plan (Citywide Streetscape Design 11 _ City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX Standards), and incorporate tree wells, bus shelters, fencing and wall, within the public right-of-way. 4. The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture and color, and will remain aesthetically appealing: The Project will serve as a visual gateway into the City with its distinctive identity, incorporate a significant landmark entry feature near the corner of Diamond Bar Boulevard and Brea Canyon Road, and provide public right-of- way enhancements in accordance with the forthcoming Citywide Streetscape Design Standards currently being developed by staff. In addition, the Project has varied architectural building details, finishes and treatment on the elevations, and there is diversity between the units from street view. 5. The proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious (e.g., negative effect on property values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity: Before the issuance of any City permits, the Project is required to comply with all conditions within the approved resolution, and the Building and Safety Division and Public Works Departments, and L.A. County Fire Department requirements. The referenced agencies through the permit and inspection process will ensure that the Project is not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. 6. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA): The City certified the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the SDSP on February 21, 2012. The FEIR analyzed the potential environmental impacts resulting from the SDSP's approval from both a programmatic and project -level perspective, analyzing the development of the Project Site for residential and recreational uses with accompanying on-site and off-site infrastructure improvements. With the submittal of a project -specific application, an Addendum to the FEIR has been prepared, which includes minor technical changes and additions in order to determine the Project's consistency with the SDSP. The Project is in substantial conformance with the SDSP and the Addendum to the FEIR documents that no new environmental issues has been identified and states the reasons to support the findings that the Project would not have any potentially significant impacts on the environment with the proposed mitigation measures included. A mitigation reporting and monitoring program (MRMP) has been prepared, which address site-specific conditions for the Project. The purpose of the 12 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX MRMP is to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures. The Project is conditioned to include these mitigation measures as part of Project approval. Tree Permit Findings (DBMC Section 22.38.110) 1. Preservation of the tree is not feasible and would compromise the property owner's reasonable use and enjoyment of property and surrounding land and appropriate mitigation measures: The Project requires the removal of 83 existing protected trees consisting of 75 Southern California Black Walnuts, 6 Willows, and 2 Coast Live Oaks. The preservation of these trees is not feasible because it would compromise the design and construction of the Project. The applicant is proposing to replant native Oak and Sycamore trees instead of Southern Black Walnut trees because Southern Black Walnuts have a tendency to have a weak branching structure and are prone to splitting. In addition, these trees do not have a lot of inventory in the local nurseries. The replacement trees will be planted at a 3:1 ratio with 75 Coast Live Oak and 174 Sycamore trees, totaling 249 replacement trees, to be a minimum 24 inch box size. The replacement trees will provide sufficient replacement of the natural landscape. General Plan Conformance (Government Code Section 65402) 1. In compliance with Government Code Section 65402, the contemplated transfer of Site D to the Applicant and the dedication of parkland to the City are in conformity with the City's General Plan. In conjunction with the Project, it is contemplated that the Walnut Valley Unified School District and the City of Diamond Bar will transfer their respective interests in the Project Site to the Applicant, or its successor or assign. The proposed Project will be consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Specific Plan and the zoning designation of Site D Specific Plan, which allows for the development of up to 200 for -sale dwelling units and minimum two acre usable neighborhood public park. Transfer of Site D to a developer for development of a project consistent with the Site D Specific Plan was expressly contemplated when the Site D Specific Plan and associated General Plan Amendment were adopted. In conjunction with the Project, it is also contemplated that the City will accept dedication of a maximum of 4.3 acres of property (designated as Lots 62 and 63 on Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295) for public park purposes from Applicant or its successor or assign. This is be consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Specific Plan and the Site D Specific Plan, which expressly contemplates dedication to the City of a minimum two acre usable neighborhood public park. The acceptance of dedication of additional park land by the City in conjunction with the Project is also consistent with the following provisions of the General Plan: 13 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX • Land Use Element—Goal 3, Objective 3.2, Strategy 3.2.1 states: Within the urban residential portions of the City, require the incorporation of open space and recreational areas into the design of new projects. • Resource Management Element—Goal 1, Objective 1.3, Strategy 1.3.7 states: Develop recreation facilities emphasizing active and passive recreation areas and actively pursue land acquisition for parks. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein and as prescribed under DBMC Sections 21.20.080, 22.22.150, 22.48.040, and 22.38.110, this City Council hereby finds and approves the Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Development Review, and Tree Permit, subject to the following conditions, and the attached Standard Conditions of Approval: A. GENERAL 1. The following Conditions of Approval, including the Standard Conditions of Approval attached hereto, shall be binding on and enforceable against, and, whenever used herein, the terms "applicant", "owner", and/or "applicant/owner' shall mean and refer to, each of the following: the project applicant, Lennar Homes of California, Inc., the owner(s) and tenants(s) of the property, and each of their respective successors and assigns. 2. The following Conditions of Approval, including the Standard Conditions of Approval attached hereto, shall be binding on and enforceable against, and, whenever used herein, the terms "applicant", "owner', and/or "applicanUowner' shall mean and refer to, each of the following: the project applicant, Lennar Homes of California, Inc., the owner(s) and tenants(s) of the property, and each of their respective successors and assigns. 3. The subdivision shall comply with the Conditions of Approval attached hereto and referenced herein. 4. This approval shall not be effective for any purpose until the applicant/owner of the property involved has filed, within twenty-one (21) days of approval of this Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295, Development Review, and Tree Permit No. PL2013-229, at the City of Diamond Bar Community Development Department, an affidavit stating that the applicant/owner is aware of and agrees to accept all the conditions of this approval. Further, this approval shall not be effective until the applicant pays the remaining City processing fees. 5. The applicant shall comply with Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.34.050. A permanent landscape maintenance program shall be implemented ensuring regular irrigation, fertilization, and weed removal. All landscaping shall be maintained in a healthy, neat and orderly condition, free of weeds and debris and with operating irrigation 14 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX at all times. Provisions for ongoing maintenance of all areas of the Subject Property under the jurisdiction of a future homeowners association shall be set forth in the association CC&R's, which shall be subject to review and approval by the City prior to final map recordation. 6. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020, the Applicant is informed that the 90 -day period in which the Applicant may protest the fees, dedications, reservation or other exaction imposed on this approval through the conditions of approval has begun. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 1. Prior to the recordation of the final map, the development shall comply with the specific requirements of Chapter 21.30 (Subdivision Design and Improvement Requirements) and Chapter 21.34 (Improvement Plans and Agreements) of the Subdivision Ordinance, as applicable. Final map approval will not be granted unless the map is in substantial compliance with Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295 including all conditions, and the applicant has entered into a subdivision improvement agreement to the satisfaction of the City Attorney. 2. The approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295 expires within three years from the date of approval if the recordation of the map has not been exercised as defined per Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Section 21.20.140. The applicant may request for a time extension if such request submitted to the City in writing is no less than 30 days prior to the approval's expiration date, subject to DBMC Section 21.20.150 for City Council approval. 3. All conditions of approval/performance standards and mitigation measures adopted by the City Council in conjunction with its certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Site D Specific Plan (SCH No. 2008021014), as revised as outlined in the Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report, which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and hereby incorporated herein by reference, shall be implemented and complied with. All required mitigation monitoring fees shall be deposited with the City 90 days prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All costs related to the ongoing monitoring shall be secured from the applicant and received by the City prior to the approval of the final map. 4. The Site D Specific Plan requires dedication to the City of a minimum of 2.0 net acres of usable public park space. The applicant has proposed to develop 4.7 acres of park space, approximately 2.2 acres of which will consist of a rain garden serving both as a required water detention facility for the subdivision and as a passive public recreational facility. In consideration for the City's acceptance of a dedication of 4.3 gross acres of public park land (of which a minimum of 2.5 net acres must be 15 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX usable), the applicant has voluntarily agreed to pay the City a one-time fee in the amount of $136,500.00 to offset future operation and maintenance costs of the 4.3 gross acres of park land, including the rain garden / detention basin. Accordingly, the applicant (i) shall include on the final map an irrevocable offer to dedicate to the City a maximum of 4.3 gross acres and a minimum of 2.5 net usable acres of property within Lots 62 and 63 identified on the Vesting Tentative Map for public park purposes; and (ii) prior to City's acceptance of the dedication, shall pay the City a one-time payment for the operation and maintenance costs of the park in the amount of $136,500.00. 5. Prior to the issuance of the building permit for the 100th dwelling unit, the park shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Community Services Director. Following completion of the park, there shall be at least 120 days for plant establishment before consideration for park turnover to the City. If the 100th dwelling unit is within a multi -unit building, the building permit for the entire building shall be withheld until the park is completed. 6. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for the first residential unit, the applicant shall submit detailed design of the park showing all the elements and amenities for review and approval by the Community Development Director and Community Services Director. The park design shall also be reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Commission prior to final approval. The design elements shall include, at minimum, the following: • Two sets of tot lots for 5-12 year olds, and shall include swing set (could be combined in one location if space is insufficient). • Two sets of tot lots for 2-5 year olds, and shall include swing set (could be combined in one location if space is insufficient). • Pedestrian/maintenance vehicle bridge over Brea Canyon Flood Control Channel. • Rain Garden interpretive area, must be fenced with lockable gates. • Two sets of picnic areas (shall include shade structure(s) if requested by City). • Trail head for future Crooked Creek trail. • Six stations of exercise equipment. • Two drinking fountains. • Two park identification signs. 16 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX • Above -ground drain on the south end of the lot adjacent to Brea Canyon Road shall be covered. • Parking lot for a minimum of six spaces, to be developed on the south end of the lot, adjacent to Brea Canyon Road. • Corner entry feature. • Twelve park benches. • Centralized irrigation system. • Decorative fence shall be installed between Brea Canyon Road and Neighborhood Park. In addition, the final park design plans shall include landscaping along the south of the pathway between Pasado Drive and the pedestrian bridge to serve as a visual barrier between the path and backyards of residences south of the development to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director and Community Services Director. The City reserves the right to eliminate any of the above park elements at its sole discretion. 7. Prior to dedication of the public park to the City, a detailed Maintenance and Operations Plan for the basin area referred to on the Project Plans as the Rain Garden shall be submitted to the Community Services Director for review and approval. 8. All concrete inlet/outlet structures in the detention basin/Rain Garden shall be adequately landscaped to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director and Community Services Director. 9. The Rain Garden shall include shade structures and benches, subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director and Community Services Director. 10. Prior to the City's acceptance of the Applicant's offer of dedication of the public park, the Applicant shall construct an "entry feature" in the vicinity of the Diamond Bar Boulevard and Brea Canyon Road. With regards to its design characteristics, the entry feature shall seek to visually draw from elements of the community and/or its history and serve as a "gateway" informing motorists and other viewers that they have entered the City of Diamond Bar. The minimum standard of performance used to measure compliance with this requirement shall be that the entry feature shall have a value, as determined by the Community Development Director, of not less than one-half of one percent (0.005) of the total building permit valuation for all residential structures within the Project boundaries. 17 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX 11. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall prepare Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association for the approval of the Planning Division, Public Works/Engineering Department, and the City Attorney. The approved CC&Rs shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map, and a recorded copy shall be provided to the Community Development Department. Without limiting the City's approval rights, the CC&Rs shall, at a minimum, comply with the following requirements: i. The CC&Rs shall require the Homeowners' Association to submit to the Planning Division, a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. ii. The Conditions of Approval for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295, Development Review, and Tree Permit (Planning Case No. PL 2013-229) shall be incorporated into the CC&Rs, and provisions corresponding to any applicable Conditions of Approval shall be included in the CC&Rs. The CC&Rs shall require that all portions of the project be used, improved, repaired and maintained in strict compliance with all applicable provisions of the Conditions of Approval. iii. The CC&Rs shall include a provision acceptable to the City requiring the Homeowner's Association and the property owners to maintain the project in compliance with all applicable water quality laws, regulations, and standards of the State, City, or any other applicable governmental agency, to implement, and fund implementation of, the approved Operation and Maintenance ("O&M") Plan for the property, and to operate and maintain the Best Management Practices ("BMPs") described in the O&M Plan. iv. The CC&Rs shall include provisions regarding the preservation of Oak and Sycamore trees as outlined in the tree mitigation plan. v. The CC&Rs shall include provisions to the effect that the secondary master suite in the NextGen homes included in Plan 2 of the 60x70 lots, shall not contain a cooktop kitchen facility and separate metered utilities. vi. The CC&Rs shall include a provision that street trees on Diamond Bar Boulevard shall be irrigated from the development's automatic irrigation system. vii. The CC&Rs shall include provisions acceptable to the City regarding graffiti abatement. viii. The CC&Rs shall identify the City as an express third party beneficiary for purposes of enforcing the CC&Rs and these Conditions of Approval and shall give the City the right, but not the 18 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX obligation, to enforce the provisions of the CC&Rs and the Conditions of Approval by any legal or equitable means, or by any method available to the HOA, against the Declarant, HOA, property owners, their successors and assigns, or other persons in possession of the Project. In the enforcement of the CC&Rs, the City shall not be limited to the procedures or processes applicable to the HOA and may use any remedy provided under law or equity, including the City's Municipal Code. Any Alternative Dispute Resolution procedures set forth in the CC&Rs shall not apply to or bind the City. ix. The CC&Rs may not be terminated or substantially amended without prior written approval of the City. 12. Prior to the final map recordation or issuance of building permit, whichever comes first, the applicant shall provide the City with a "Buyer's Awareness Package" for the City's review and approval. The "Buyer's Awareness Package" shall include, but is not limited to, information pertaining to geological issues regarding the property, wildlife corridors, preservation of Oak and Sycamore trees, natural vegetation preservation issues, maintenance program for urban pollutant basins, all mitigation measures within the Mitigation Monitoring Program and explanatory information pertaining to restrictions on the use of properties such as the secondary master suites in the NextGen homes, and similar related matters. The applicant shall give each buyer a copy of the "Buyer's Awareness Package" and shall document their receipt of the same in the escrow instructions of each lot and document their receipt to the City. 13. The secondary master suite in the NextGen homes included in Plan 2 of the 60x70 lots, shall not contain a cooktop kitchen facility and separate metered utilities. The provisions to this effect shall be included in the Buyer's Awareness Package. 14. Prior to final map approval, street names shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public Works/Engineering Department. Street names shall not duplicate existing streets within the City of Diamond Bar's postal service zip code areas. C. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 1. This approval is for the site plan, elevations, exterior materials, and conceptual landscape plans for a new 182 -unit residential development to be constructed at the southeast corner of Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard, as described in the staff report and depicted on the approved plans on file with the Planning Division, subject to the conditions in this Resolution. 2. The construction documents submitted for plan check shall be in substantial compliance with the architectural plans approved by the City Council, as modified pursuant to the conditions below. If the plan check 19 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX submittal is not in substantial compliance with the approved Development Review submittal, the plans may require further staff review and re -notification of the surrounding property owners, which may delay the project and entail additional fees. 3. Prior to building permit issuance, landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for review and approval by the City's Consulting Landscape Architect for compliance with the Water Conservation Landscaping Ordinance. Appropriate and sufficient irrigation shall be provided to the Verdura walls and fast growing plant materials that grow all year round shall be used. 4. All existing landscaping and public improvements damaged during construction shall be repaired or replaced upon project completion. 5. All lighting fixtures shall be approved by the Planning Division as to type, orientation, and height. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate type, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 6. The applicant shall install street lighting along the internal private_ streets within the development. 7. The main entry gate, walls, and directory kiosk shall include decorative pilasters such as stacked stone or similar material, subject to the review and approval of the Planning Division. 8. The emergency access gate at the end of Pasado Drive shall have a decorative pattern, and final design shall be subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director and Community Services Director. 9. All landscape areas on the site as well as contiguous landscaped slopes along Diamond Bar Boulevard shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy and thriving conditions, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 10. Prior to the issuance of building permits, house numbering plans shall be submitted to and approved by the City Public Works Department. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. 11. Best Management Practices (BMP) devices shall be designed in consultation with the Greater Los Angeles County Vector Control District and shall be of a type which minimizes the potential for vector (public 20 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX nuisance) problems and maintained throughout the project life so as not to contribute to those problems. Unless accepted by the County and/or by the City, the responsibilities for and the funding of the maintenance of BMPs shall constitute obligations of the homeowners association. 12. In order to demonstrate compliance with applicable State and federal resource protection policies designed to protect or compensate for the loss of biological resources, prior to the issuance of grading permit, where applicable, the Applicant shall provide the Community Development Director with documentation of receipt of the following permits: (1) Section 401 (Federal Clean Water Act) water quality certification or waiver of waste discharge requirements from the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region; (2) nationwide Section 404 (Federal Clean Water Act) permit from the Unites States Army Corps of Engineers; and (3) Section 1602 (California Fish and Game Code) streambed alteration agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game. The Applicant shall comply with all associated permit requirements. 13. As determined feasible by the Community Development Director, initial vegetation removal activities shall be conducted outside the nesting season (February 15 -August 15) to avoid impacts upon nesting birds. If initial vegetation removal activities occur during the nesting season, prior to the commencement of any grading or grubbing activities, all suitable habitat shall first be thoroughly surveyed by a qualified biologist for the presence of nesting birds. If any active nests are detected, a buffer of at least 300 feet (500 feet for raptors) shall be delineated, flagged, and vegetation removal activities avoided therein until the nesting cycle is complete, as determined by the surveying biologist or a qualified biological monitor. 14. Prior to approval of the park plan, the applicant shall obtain all requisite permits and approvals from the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works — Flood Control District allowing for the building of the pedestrian/maintenance vehicle bridge over the Brea Canyon Flood Control Channel, and shall provide the City Engineer with documentation, acceptable to the City Engineer, demonstrating County approval and authorization, including a complete list of all permit requirements that may be associated therewith. 15. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall submit and, when deemed acceptable, the City Engineer shall approve a construction worker parking and equipment staging plan (PESP) designed to minimize disturbance to the surrounding residences to the greatest extent feasible. Unless otherwise authorized therein, contractors and other construction personnel performing construction activities in proximity to the project site shall be prohibited from parking and/or operating construction equipment, dumpsters, trailers, or other material within a public right-of-way or other public property. The PESP can be 21 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX combined with or become a part of the construction traffic safety plan and/or any other construction management plan as may be required by the City. 16. Unless previously approved by the City Engineer, no construction access shall be authorized from and no construction traffic shall be permitted along Castle Rock Road and Pasado Drive, except as may be required to construct and maintain any project -related street and other improvements within and adjacent to those rights-of-way. 17. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall submit and, when deemed acceptable, the City Engineer shall approve a construction traffic mitigation plan (CTMP). The CTMP shall identify the travel and haul routes to be used by construction vehicles; the points of ingress and egress for all construction vehicles; temporary street or lane closures, temporary signage, and temporary striping; location of materials and equipment staging areas; maintenance plans to remove spilled debris from roadway surfaces; and the hours during which large construction equipment may be brought on/off the project site. The Applicant shall keep all haul routes clean and free of debris including but not limited to gravel and dirt as a result of its operations. The Applicant shall clean adjacent streets, as directed by the City Engineer, of any material which may have been spilled, tracked, or blown onto adjacent streets or areas. Hauling or transport of oversize loads will be allowed between the hours of 9:00 AM and 3:00 PM only, Monday through Friday, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. No hauling or transport will be allowed during nighttime hours, weekends, or federal holidays. The use of local streets shall be limited only to those that provide direct access to the destination. Haul trucks entering or exiting public streets shall at all times yield to public traffic. If hauling operations cause any damage to existing pavement, street, curb, and/or gutter along the haul route, the Applicant will be fully responsible for repairs. The repairs shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 18. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall submit and, when deemed acceptable, the City shall approve a traffic control plan (TCP). The TCP shall be consistent with the Southern California Chapter of the American Public Works Association's "Work Area Traffic Control Handbook" (WATCH), the California Department of Transportation's "Manual of Traffic Controls for Construction and Maintenance Work Zones," or such alternative as may be deemed acceptable by the City. The TCP shall describe the Applicant's plans to safely and efficiently maintain vehicular and non -vehicular access along local roadways throughout the construction period. If any temporary access restrictions or lane closures are proposed by the Applicant, the TCP shall delineate detour routes, the hours, duration and frequency of such restrictions, and the emergency access and safety measures that will be implemented during those closures or restrictions. The TCP can be combined with or become a part of the construction traffic safety plan 22 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX and/or any other construction management plan as may be required by the City. 19. As determined by the City Engineer, should project -related construction activities result in the short-term closure of the existing Class II bicycle lanes or Class III bicycle paths along Diamond Bar Boulevard and/or Brea Canyon Road, during the term of that closure, signage shall be posted and other reasonable actions designed to enhance public safety taken within the area of those closures informing both motorists and bicyclists of that action. 20. Prior to the approval of any subsequent tentative tract map or the initiation of any improvements to Diamond Bar Boulevard that would result in the elimination of the existing Class II bicycle lane within that right-of-way, the City Engineer shall review street improvement plans for Diamond Bar Boulevard and determine the potential for retention, reconfiguration, and/or reclassification of the existing Class II bicycle lane along the property's frontage, within the existing right-of-way or as a result of the dedication of additional public right-of-way along Diamond Bar Boulevard or within the tract map boundaries and linking with the existing terminus points beyond the boundaries of the project site. Should the City Engineer determine that none of those options are feasible or desirable, a study shall be conducted and, when acceptable, approved by the City Engineer ascertaining whether the near -site elimination of the existing Class II bicycle lane will adversely impact rider safety or traffic flow and what actions can be taken by the City and/or the Applicant to maintain a sufficient level of rider and motorist safety. The findings of that study and the recommendations contained therein shall be submitted to the City Council for their consideration. 21. In order to reduce freeway -related noise impacts, all residential units shall include forced air ventilation designed and installed in accordance with Title 24 of California Building Code standards. 22. Prior to the commencement of grading activities, the Applicant shall prepare and submit for review by the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department (LACSD) a draft construction security plan outlining the activities that will be instituted by the Applicant to secure the construction site and the equipment and materials located thereupon from potential criminal incidents. The Applicant shall incorporate the recommendations of the LACSD, if any, into a final construction security plan and shall implement that plan during the construction period. 23. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the LACSD shall be provided the opportunity to review and comment upon building plans and the configuration of the residential development and neighborhood park in order to: (1) facilitate opportunities for improved emergency access and response; (2) ensure the consideration of design strategies that facilitate public safety and police surveillance; and (3) offer specific design 23 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX recommendations to enhance public safety and reduce potential demands upon police protection services. 24. Prior to the commencement of grading or grubbing activities, the Applicant shall prepare and submit and the Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACFD) shall review and, when deemed acceptable, approve a fire protection program and workplace standards for fire safety outlining those activities to be undertaken by the Applicant during the construction period. The Applicant shall abide by specific project -level permit conditions identified by the LACFD. 25. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACFD) will review and, when deemed acceptable, approve (1)final water improvement plans including, but not limited to, the location, sizing, design, and fire flow capacity of the proposed water mains and fire hydrants and proposed access improvements to ensure compliance with applicable Fire Code requirements; and (2) building plans. The project's water system shall be designed in response to final fire flow requirements identified by the LACFD. 26. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall submit to the Building Official for review and approval a temporary fencing and signage plan designed to discourage access to any active construction areas by children and other unauthorized parties. 27. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall present the City with a certificate of compliance or other documentation demonstrating that the Applicant has complied with the Walnut Valley Unified School District's School Board resolutions governing the payment of school impact fees or has entered into an Assembly Bill 2926 authorized school fee mitigation agreement or is not subject to the school impact fee exaction. D. TREE PERMIT 1. Prior to final approval of a grading permit or initiation of any activity that involves the removal/disturbance of oak and walnut woodland habitat, the applicant shall develop a detailed tree mitigation plan specifying the following: (1)describe the number, size, and location of compensatory trees to be planted; (2) outline success criteria and adaptive management procedures to ensure that the mitigation plan is successful; (3) a maintenance agreement stipulating the applicant's obligations for a minimum three-year period, including the annual reporting; (4) the amount and derivation of the security deposit required under the City's tree preservation ordinance; and submit the plan to the City for review and approval. Mitigation shall include a minimum replacement ratio of 3:1, totaling 249 replacement trees to be planted on-site. 24 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX The City Council shall: (a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and (b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution by certified mail to: Geoff Smith, Lennar Homes of California, Inc., 25 Enterprise, Suite 300, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 and Jeanette Ullrich, Assistant Superintendent, Walnut Valley Unified School District, 880 S. Lemon Avenue, Walnut, CA 91789. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2013, BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. M Jack Tanaka, Mayor I, Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 19h day of November 2013, by the following vote: AYES: Council Member: NOES: Council Member: ABSENT: Council Member: ATTEST: Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk City of Diamond Bar 25 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS NEW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT #: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295, Development Review, and Tree Permit (Planning Case No. PL 2013-229) SUBJECT: A Vesting Tentative Tract Map to subdivide an existing vacant 30 -acre lot into 63 lots for the development of 182 for -sale dwelling units and minimum two acre neighborhood public park, Development Review of the proposed architectural and landscape design elements associated with the proposed residential component of Site D, and Tree Permit to remove 83 existing protected trees and replace them at a 3:1 ratio with 249 replacement trees to be planted on-site. PROPERTY OWNERS: Walnut Valley Unified School District and City of Diamond Bar APPLICANT: Lennar Homes of California, Inc., 25 Enterprise, Suite 300, Aliso Vieio CA 92656 LOCATION: Southeast Corner of Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard, Diamond Bar, CA 91789 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION AT (909) 839-7030, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. In accordance with Government Code Section 66474.9(b) (1), the applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, and its officers, agents and employees, from any claim, action, or proceeding to attack, set-aside, void or annul the approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Development Review, and Tree Permit No. PL2013-229 brought within the time period provided by Government Code Section 66499.37. In the event the city and/or its officers, agents and employees are made a party of any such action: Q1 -- - - - - - - City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX -- (a) Applicant shall provide a defense to the City defendants or at the City's option reimburse the City its costs of defense, including reasonable attorneys fees, incurred in defense of such claims. (b) Applicant shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against the City defendants. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action of proceeding, and shall cooperate fully in the defense thereof. 2. This approval shall not be effective for any purpose until the applicant and owner of the property involved have filed, within twenty-one (21) days of approval of this Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Development Review, and Tree Permit No. PL2013-229 at the City of Diamond Bar Community Development Department, their affidavit stating that they are aware of and agrees to accept all the conditions of this approval. Further, this approval shall not be effective until the applicants pays remaining City processing fees, school fees and fees for the review of submitted reports. 3. All designers, architects, engineers, and contractors associated with this project shall obtain a Diamond Bar Business License, and zoning approval for those businesses located in Diamond Bar. 4. Signed copies of City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all partied involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of City permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Revised plans incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval during plan check. 7. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval shall be completed. 8. The project site shall be maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of approval and all laws, or other applicable Federal, State, or City regulations. 9. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and any applicable Specific Plan in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 10. Property owner/applicant shall remove the public hearing notice board within three (3) days of this project's approval. 27 -- - -- - City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX 11. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of Planning and Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works/Engineering Department, and the Los Angeles County Fire Department. 12. These conditions of approval shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all future owners, operators, or successors thereto of the property. Non- compliance with any condition of approval or mitigation measure imposed as a condition of this approval, shall constitute a violation of the City's Development Code. Violations may be enforced in accordance with the provisions of the Development Code. 13. To ensure compliance with the provisions of the City Council design approval, a final inspection is required from the Planning Division when work for any phase of the project has been completed. The applicant shall inform the Planning Division and schedule an appointment for such an inspection. 14. Failure to comply with any of the conditions set forth herein or as subsequently amended in writing by the City, may result in failure to obtain a building final and/or a certificate of occupancy until full compliance is reached. The City's requirement for full compliance may require minor corrections and/or complete demolition of a non-compliance improvement, regardless of costs incurred where the project does not comply with design requirements and approvals that the applicant agreed to when permits were pulled to construct the project. B. FEES/DEPOSITS 1. Applicant shall pay development fees (including but not limited to Planning, Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works Department and Mitigation Monitoring) at the established rates, prior to issuance of building permits, as required by the City. School fees as required shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permit. In addition, the applicant shall pay all remaining prorated City project review and processing fees prior to final map approval. 2. Prior to final map approval, all deposit accounts for the processing of this project shall have no deficits. C. TIME LIMITS 1. The approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Development Review, and Tree Permit shall expire within three (3) years from the date of approval if the use has not been exercised as defined pursuant to Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 21.20.140 and 22.66.050(b)(1). In accordance with Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.60.050(c), the applicant may request, in writing, for a one-year time extension for City Council consideration. Such a request must be submitted to the Planning Division prior to the expiration date and be accompanied by the review fee in accordance with the Fee Schedule in effect at the time of submittal. 28 - -- - - - - City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX D. SITE DEVELOPMENT 1. The project site shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the approved plans submitted to, approved, and amended herein by the City Council, on file with the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 2. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, air conditioning condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berms, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Division. 3. All roof -mounted equipment shall be screened from public view. 4. All structures, including walls, trash enclosures, canopies, etc., shall be maintained in a structurally sound, safe manner with a clean, orderly appearance. All graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours by the property owners/occupant. 5. No occupancy permit can be granted, until all improvements required by this approval have been properly constructed, inspected, and approved. 6. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the location, size, and screening of all building utility service connections, including water, gas, and electric service, fire service, and irrigation connections shall be approved by the Community Development Director. All changes to building utility connections shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to construction. Building utility connections shall be located, sized and screened in such a manner that they have the least possible impact on the design of the building and site. The architect of record shall be directly involved in the design and placement of all site and building service connections and shall sign all plans submitted to the City which locate, size and/or screen utility connections. 7. Additional plant materials may be required by the Community Development Director and shall be planted prior to final occupancy in order to screen utility connections, valves, backflow devices, and all above ground appurtenances, etc., to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. This determination shall be made in the field after all screen utility connections, valves, backflow devices, and all above ground appurtenances, etc. have been installed and inspected. E. SOLID WASTE 1. The site shall be maintained in a condition, which is free of debris both during and after the construction, addition, or implementation of the entitlement approved herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether during or subsequent to construction shall be done only by the property owner, applicant or by a duly permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste from 29 - - - - City Council Resolution No: 2013 -XX residential, commercial, construction, and industrial areas within the City. It shall be the applicant's obligation to insure that the waste contractor used has obtained permits from the City of Diamond Bar to provide such services. 2. Mandatory solid waste disposal services shall be provided by the City franchised waste hauler to all parcels/lots or uses affected by approval of this project. 3. All trash pick-ups shall be for individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, (909) 839-7040, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: /11IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII H4014:7_14 1. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for review and approval with the park precise grading plans. 2. A title report/guarantee showing all fee owners, interest holders, and nature of interest shall be submitted with final map plan check. An updated title report/guarantee and subdivision guarantee shall be submitted ten (10) business days prior to final map approval. 3. A permit from the Los Angeles County Public Works Department and/or Los Angeles County Flood Control District (LACFCD) shall be required for work within its right-of-way/easements or connection to its facilities. 4. Prior to final map approval, written certification that all utility services and any other public utility service related to the site shall be available to serve the proposed project and shall be submitted to the City. Such letters shall be issued by the respective utility company within ninety (90) calendar days prior to final map approval. 5. Prior to final map approval, applicant shall submit to the City Engineer the detail cost estimates for bonding purposes of all onsite/offsite improvements including grading, street improvement, sewer, storm drain, landscape and irrigation, and monumentation. 6. Prior to final map approval, if any public or private improvements required as part of this map have not been completed by applicant and accepted by the City, applicant shall enter into a subdivision agreement with the City and shall post the appropriate security. 7. Prior to final map approval, all site grading, landscaping and irrigation, street, sewer and storm drain improvement plans shall be approved by the City Engineer, surety shall be posted, and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all public and private improvements. 30 -- -- - — — - - - - City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX 8. Prior to issuance of grading permits, storm drain plans shall be approved with surety posted guaranteeing completion of all drainage facilities to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 9. Any details or notes which may be inconsistent with requirement or ordinances, general conditions of approval, or City policies shall be specifically approved in other conditions or ordinance requirements as modified to those shown on the vesting tentative tract map upon approval by the City Council. 10. All identified geologic hazards within the project boundaries which cannot be mitigated as approved by the City Engineer shall be indicated on the final map as 'Restricted Use Area" subject to geologic hazard. The applicant shall dedicate to the City the right to prohibit the erection of buildings or other structures within such restricted use areas shown on the final map. 11. Prior to finalization of any development phase, sufficient street, sewer, and drainage improvements shall be completed beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access, proper outfall for sewers and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot lines shown on the final map. 12. Prior to any work performed in the existing street right-of-way along Diamond Bar Blvd., Brea Canyon Road, Pasado Drive or Castle Rock Road permit fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Department in addition to any other permits required. 13. Applicant shall label and delineate on the final map any private streets, driveways or fire lanes to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 14. Upon recordation of the final map, applicant shall submit to the Public Works/Engineering Department, at no cost to the City, a full size reproducible copy of the recorded map. Final acceptance of the public improvements shall not be given until the copy of the recorded map is received by the Public Works/Engineering Department. 15. Prior to occupancy, the applicant shall provide to the City as built mylars, stamped by appropriate individuals certifying the completion of all improvements at no cost to the City. 16. Applicant shall contribute funds to a separate engineering trust deposit against which charges can be made by the City or its representatives for services rendered. Charges shall be on an hourly basis and shall include any City administrative costs. 17. Applicant shall provide digitized information in a format defined by the City for all related plans, at no cost to the City. 31 - - City Council Resolution No. 2013-)(X - - 18. All activities/improvements proposed for this VTTM 72295 shall be wholly contained within the boundaries of the map. Should any off-site activities/improvements be required, approval shall be obtained from the affected property owner and the City as required by the City Engineer, B. GRADING/GEOTECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS 1. No grading or any staging or construction shall be performed prior to final map approval by the City Council and map recordation or grading permit issuance, whichever comes first. All pertinent improvement plans shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval by the City Council, 2. Prior to the issuance of any City permits, the applicant shall provide written permission to the satisfaction of the City from any property owners which will be affected by offsite grading. 3. All sewer and storm drain plans shall be approved prior to grading permit issuance. 4. Prior to beginning any grading activities, appropriate rodent control shall be installed around the perimeter of the project site to prevent the migration of rodents to existing residential and commercial sites. A plan detailing the proposed rodent barriers to be used by the developer/contractor shall be submitted to the Public Works/Engineering Department and Planning Division for review. 5. Retaining wall location shall be shown on the grading plan and submitted with a soils report to the Public Works/Engineering Department for review concurrently with the grading plan check. 6. Grading and construction activities and the transportation of equipment and materials and operation of heavy grading equipment shall be limited to between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. Dust generated by grading and construction activities shall be reduced by watering the soil prior to and during the activities and in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 402 and Rule 403. Reclaimed water shall be utilized whenever possible. Additionally, all construction equipment shall be properly muffled to reduce noise levels. 7. All equipment staging areas shall be located on the project site. Staging area, including material stockpile and equipment storage area, shall be enclosed within a 6 foot -high chain link fence. All access points to the staging area shall be locked whenever the construction site is not supervised. 8. Precise grading plans for each lot shall be submitted to the Public Works/Engineering Department for approval prior to issuance of building permits. 32 - City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX 9. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the California Building Code, City Grading Ordinance, Hillside Management Ordinance and acceptable grading practices. 10. The maximum grade of driveways serving building pad areas shall be 15 percent. In hillside areas driveway grades exceeding 10 percent shall have parking landings with a minimum 16 feet deep and shall not exceed five (5) percent grade or as required by the City Engineer. Driveways with a slope of 15 percent shall incorporate grooves for traction into the driveway as required by the City Engineer. 11. At the time of submittal of the 40 -scale grading plan for plan check, a detailed soils and geology report shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval. Said report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer and/or geologist licensed by the State of California. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a detailed geotechnical investigation will be required to evaluate the site conditions with respect to the proposed development and provide geotechnical recommendations for design and construction of the proposed improvements. 12. The detailed geotechnical investigation shall address the review comments by the City's Geotechnical Engineering Consultant, Leighton and Associates dated August 23, 2013, and September 17, 2013, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 13. Rough and Precise grading plans shall be designed in compliance with the recommendations of the final detailed soils and engineering geology reports. All remedial earthwork specified in the final report shall be incorporated into the grading plans. Grading plans shall be signed and stamped by a California Registered Civil Engineer, registered Geotechnical Engineer and registered Engineering Geologist and approved by the City Engineer. 14. A Low Impact Development (LID) Plan conforming to the 2012 MS4 Permit issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region Order No. R4-2012-0175, on November 08, 2012 shall be submitted for review and approval as deemed necessary and may be required to be incorporated into the grading, storm drain and street improvement plans to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. All review comments by the City's Water Quality Consultant, John L. Hunter and Associates, dated August 13, 2013, shall be addressed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 15. A separate Low Impact Development (LID) Plan conforming to the 2012 MS4 Permit issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region Order No. R4-2012-0175, on November 08, 2012 shall be submitted for review and approval and may be required to be incorporated into the grading, storm drain and street improvement plans to the satisfaction of the City Engineer for any and all park improvements. 16. An erosion control plan shall be approved by the City Engineer. Erosion control plans shall be made in accordance to the City's NPDES requirements. A 33 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX separate Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is required. Grading permits will not be issued until approval of the SWPPP and the associated WDID Number have been issued by the State Regional Water Quality Control Board. 17. All slopes shall be seeded per landscape plan and/or fuel modification plan with native grasses or planted with ground cover, shrubs, and trees for erosion control upon completion of grading or some other alternative method of erosion control shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and a permanent irrigation system shall be installed per the City's Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. 18. Submit a stockpile plan showing the proposed location for stockpile for grading export materials, and the route of transport. 19. Prepare a horizontal control plan and submit concurrently with the grading plan for review and approval. 20. Prior to commencing any grading activities, a pre -construction meeting must be held at the project site with the grading contractor, geotechnical engineer applicant, and city grading inspector and engineers and City building inspector at least 48 hours prior to commencing grading operations. 21. Rough grade certifications by project soils and civil engineers and a geotechnical as -graded report shall be submitted prior to issuance of building permits for any residential structure. Retaining wall permits may be issued concurrently with the grading permits. 22. Retaining wall permits shall be obtained from the Building and Safety Division. 23. Final grade certifications by project soils engineer and civil engineers shall be submitted to the Public Works/Engineering Department prior to the issuance of any project final inspections/certificate of occupancy. 24. Precise grading plans for Lots 62 and 63, to be dedicated to the City as a public park, shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval. A separate grading permit will be required for precise grading activities on Lots 62 and 63. C. DRAINAGE 1. All terrace drains and drainage channels shall be constructed in muted earth tones so as not to impart adverse visual impacts. Terrace drains shall follow landform slope configuration and shall not be placed in an exposed positions. All down drains shall be hidden in swales diagonally or curvilinear across a slope face. 2. All storm drain improvements shall be installed and accepted by the City prior to issuance of building permits, for construction upon any parcel that may be 34 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX - subject to drainage flows entering, leaving, or within a parcel relative to which a building permit is requested. 3. Prior to placement of any dredged or fill material into any U.S.G.S. blue line stream bed, a 404 permit shall be obtained from the Army Corps of Engineers and an agreement with the California Department of Fish and Game shall be obtained and submitted to the City Engineer. 4. All identified flood hazard locations within the project boundaries which cannot be mitigated as approved by the City Engineer shall be shown on the final map and delineated as "Flood Hazard Area." 5. Storm drainage facilities shall be constructed within the street right-of-way or in easements satisfactory to the City Engineer and dedicated to the Home Owners Association (HOA). 6. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a complete hydrology and hydraulic study shall be prepared by a Civil Engineer registered in the State of California to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 7. All storm drain plans shall comply with the approved Low Impact Development (LID) Plan to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 8. Connection to any Los Angeles County Facility will require Los Angeles County approval. All approvals and any associated permits from the County shall be submitted to the City prior to approval of any storm drain improvements plans. 9. Grading and coverage of the drainage channel on Lot 63 will require approval from the Los Angeles County Flood Control District. Permits for work within Lot 63 will not be issued without written approval from LACFCD. 10. A comprehensive Operations & Maintenance (O&M) plan/program shall be submitted concurrently with the storm drain plans to the Public Works/Engineering Department for review and approval to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The O&M Plan/Program shall be included in the CC&R's as a responsibility of the HOA. 11. Easements for ingress/egress and maintenance purposes shall be reserved on the final map for the maintenance responsibilities by the HOA of the inlet structure to the detention basin/public park area. IN ;INN aIWTI I 1. The applicant shall replace and record any centerline ties and monuments that are removed as part of this construction with the Los Angeles County Public Works Survey Division. 2. Street improvement plans in a 24" x 36" sheet format, prepared by a registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. 35 -- - - City Council Resolution No. 2013-XX-- Streets shall not exceed a maximum slope of 12 percent. All street improvement plans shall conform to the approved Low Impact Development (LID) Plan to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 3. New street centerline monuments shall be set at the intersections of two or more streets, intersections of two or more streets, intersections of streets with tract boundaries and to mark the beginning and ending of curves or the points of intersection of tangents thereof. Survey notes showing the ties between all monuments set and four (4) durable reference points for each shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval, prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. 4. The design and construction of private street improvements shall be set to City and County standards and designed to a design speed of 20 mph and all streets shall be posted at 15 mph speed limit with the concurrence of the applicant's traffic engineer. 5. Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy, applicant shall construct base pavement for all streets in accordance with soils report prepared by a California registered soils engineer and approved by the City Engineer or as otherwise directed by the City Engineer. 6. All improvements identified for the project along Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Blvd. shall be designed and constructed per the recommendations of the approved Traffic Impact Analysis dated July 18, 2013, Development Agreement dated April 20, 2012, and any associated amendments as well as City Standards. 7. All dedications of roadways shall be made and accepted by the City Council upon completion of the improvements and prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy. 8. Separate street improvement plans for Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Blvd. shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer. Improvement plans shall include details for street improvements, signal improvements/modifications, striping, landscape and any associated utility adjustments required as a result of the new right-of-way width. 9. Median reconstruction and landscape design along Diamond Bar Blvd. shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department and Community Services Department and shall be designed in accordance with all applicable City Standards. 10, Separate encroachment permits shall be obtained from the Public Works Department for any improvements made along Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Blvd. 36 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX 11. All streetscape improvements including parkway landscape along Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Blvd. shall be in accordance with the City's Streetscape Design Guidelines. 12. Upon completion of the construction of public right-of-way improvements, review of the roadway conditions will be warranted by the Public Works Department. Any damages to the roadway will be required to be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Engineer at the applicant's cost. At a minimum a type II slurry seal (in accordance with City specifications) and complete re -stripe of the roadway from the center of the roadway to the edge of gutter along the project frontage for Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Blvd. will be required. 13. All legal lots/parcels legally subdivided by Vesting Tentative Tract Map 72295 shall be annexed into citywide Landscape Assessment District #38. 14. Improvements along Pasado Drive shall include the dedication of the cul-de-sac to the City of Diamond Bar, reconstruction of an ADA compliant sidewalk, parkway landscape, and reconstruction of the cul-de-sac as deemed necessary to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 15. Improvements along Castle Rock Drive shall include the reconstruction of an ADA compliant sidewalk, parkway landscape, and reconstruction of the cul-de- sac as deemed necessary to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. E. UTILITIES 1. Easements, satisfactory to the City Engineer and the utility companies, for public utility and public services purposes shall be offered and shown on the detailed site plan and final map as deemed appropriate. 2. Prior to final map approval, a water system with appurtenant facilities to serve all lots/parcels in the land division, designed to the Walnut Valley Water District (WVWD) specifications, shall be provided. The system shall include fire hydrants of the type and location as determined by the Los Angeles County Fire Department. The water mains shall be sized to accommodate the total domestic and fire flows to the satisfaction of the WVWD and Fire Department. 3. Prior to final map approval, the applicant shall construct or enter into an improvement agreement with the City guaranteeing construction of the necessary improvements to the existing water system according to Walnut Valley Water District (WVWD) specifications to accommodate the total domestic and fire flows as may be required by the WVWD and Fire Department. 4. Applicant shall relocate and underground any existing on-site utilities to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the respective utility owner. 5. The power poles and guy poles along the project frontage on Diamond Bar Blvd. and Brea Canyon Road shall be eliminated and the facilities located underground. 37 - - - City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX - 6. Underground utilities shall not be constructed within the drip line of any mature tree except as approved by a registered arborist. 7. Applicant shall construct street lights on the length of the project frontage along Diamond Bar Blvd. and Brea Canyon Road, as required, per Los Angeles County Standards and as approved by the City Engineer. The street lights shall be annexed into the Los Angeles County Lighting Maintenance District 10006 and Los Angeles County Lighting District LLA -1 (Diamond Bar Zone). Approval from the County on the street light design shall be obtained prior to approval of any roadway improvement plans for Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Blvd. 8. Applicant shall design and construct street lights within the tract boundaries per City Standards and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. In -tract street lights will be the responsibility of the HOA to own, operate and maintain. 9. Electrical transformers, water meters and any other utility facilities to be constructed within the street right-of-way (public or private) landscape area will require approval of the location/placement within said right-of-way by the Community Development Director. F. SEWERS 1. Applicant shall construct a sanitary sewer system in accordance with the approved Sewer System Analysis dated September 24, 2013, and all associated amendments to the satisfaction of the City Engineer which verifies that capacity is available in the existing sewage system to be used as the outfall for the sewers in this subdivision. If the existing system including the Castle Rock and Fountain Springs Pump Stations are found to be of insufficient capacity, the deficiencies shall be resolved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 2. Each dwelling unit shall be served by a separate sewer lateral which shall not cross any other lot lines. The sanitary sewer mainline system serving the tract shall be connected to the City sewer system. Said system shall be of the size, grade and depth approved by the City Engineer, County Sanitation District and Los Angeles County Public Works and surety shall be provided and an agreement executed prior to approval of the final map if improvements are not constructed. 3. Applicant shall obtain connection permit(s) from the City. The project shall be annexed into the County Consolidated Sewer Maintenance District and appropriate easements for all sewer main lines shall be shown on the final map and offered for dedication on the final map. 4. Applicant, at applicant's sole cost and expense, shall construct the sewer system in accordance with the City, Los Angeles County Public Works Department and County Sanitation District Standards prior to occupancy. 38 -- - -- - - City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX 5. A fair share payment in the amount of $78,081.60 (based on a 15% impact to the Emergency Storage Capacity at the Castle Rock Pump Station as indicated in the Sewer and Water System Analysis dated September 24, 2013) and $29,438.71 (based on a 3.6% impact to the Emergency Storage Capacity at the Fountain Springs Pump Station as indicated in the Sewer and Water System Analysis dated September 24, 2013) shall be accepted by the City prior to the issuance of the final sewer inspection sign off and sewer improvement bond release. C� I :L1 y y [y iri I I I [H_r I Is] 61 1. All traffic mitigations shall be implemented and constructed in accordance with the Traffic Impact Analysis dated July 18, 2013, and conditions of project approval for the VTTM 72295 prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. 2. A fair share payment in the amount of $154,730.00 as identified in the Traffic Impact Analysis, dated July 18, 2013, shall be accepted by the City prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy. 3. Any changes to the proposed parking lot layout on Lot 63 from the layout shown in the Traffic Impact Analysis dated July 18, 2013, will require an amendment to the TIA and additional line of sight analysis. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 839-7020, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Plans shall conform to current State and Local Building Code requirements and all other applicable construction codes, ordinances and regulations in effect at the time of plan check submittal. Work shall be in conformance to the adopted code at the time of submittal. 2. Provisions for Cal Green shall be implemented onto plans and certification provided by a third party as required by the Building Division. Specific water, waste, low VOC, and related conservation measures shall be shown on plans. 3. Fire sprinklers are required for new single family dwellings (CRC R313.2). 4. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been met. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 5. Every permit issued by the Building and Safety Division shall expire if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit or work has discontinued and not been signed -off on the job card by the building inspector. 39 - -- - - - - - City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX - 6. Construction activities causing the operation of any tools or equipment used in construction, drilling, repair, alteration, or demolition work shall be conducted Monday — Saturday between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. 7. The project shall be protected by a construction fence to the satisfaction of the Building Official. All fencing shall be view obstructing with opaque surfaces. 8. All structures and property shall be maintained in a safe and clean manner during construction. The property shall be free of debris, trash, and weeds. 9. All equipment staging areas shall be maintained in an orderly manner and screened behind a minimum 6' high fence. 10. Solid waste management of construction material shall incorporate recycling material collection per Diamond Bar Municipal Code 8.16 of Title 8. 11. The minimum design load for wind in this area is 85 M.P.H. exposures "C" and the site is within seismic zone D or E. The applicant shall submit drawings and calculations prepared by a California State licensed Architect/Engineer with wet stamp and signature. 12. This project shall comply with the energy conservation requirements of the State of California Energy Commission. All lighting shall be high efficacy or equivalent per the current California Energy Code 119 and 150(k). 13. Indoor air quality shall be provided consistent with ASHRAE 62.2 as required per California Energy Code 150(0), 14. This project shall comply with all Accessibility Code requirements of California Building Code Chapter 11A for all units that are considered "covered multifamily dwelling units" per CBC 1104A. 15. Where sales trailers or temporary offices used by the public are provided, accessible design is required and a separate permit is required. 16. Submit Public Works Department approved grading plans showing clearly all finish elevations, drainage, and retaining walls locations. 17. "Separate permits are required for fountains, retaining walls, fences over 6' in height, common use facilities, and entry monuments" and shall be noted on plans. 18. A height and setback survey will be required at completion of framing and foundations respectively. Location of new homes shall be staked in the field by the surveyor. 19. Prior to Building permit issuance, all school district fees must be paid. Please obtain a form from the Building and Safety Division to take directly to the school district. 40 City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX 20. Indicate all easements on the site plan. 21. LA County Fire approval is required. Contact Fire Department for requirements pertaining to access, fire flow, etc. 22. All retaining walls shall be submitted to the Building and Safety and Public Work Departments for review and approval. 23. Submit grading plans showing clearly all finish elevations, drainage, and retaining wall locations. No building permits shall be issued prior to submitting a pad certification. 24. The project shall be protected by a construction fence and shall comply with the NPDES & BMP requirements (sand bags, etc.) 25. Check drainage patterns with Engineering Department. Surface water shall drain away from building at a 2% minimum slope. 26. Specify location of tempered glass as required by code. 27. Specify 1/4"/ft slope for all flat surfaces/ decks with approved water proofing material. Also, provide guardrail connection detail (height, spacing, etc.) 28. Special inspections and structural observation will be required in conformance to CBC 1704 to 1709. 29. A soils report is required and all recommendations of the soils report shall be adhered to. 30. Slope setbacks consistent with California Building Code Figure 1805.3.1 and California Residential Code R403.1.7. Foundations shall provide a minimum distance to daylight. 31. The applicant shall contact Dig Alert and have underground utility locations marked by the utility companies prior to any excavation. Contact Dig Alert by dialing 811 or their website at www.digalert.org, 32. The location of property lines and building pad may require a survey. 33. All workers on the job shall be covered by workman's compensation insurance under a licensed general contractor. 34. Any changes to approved plans during the course of construction shall be approved by the City prior to proceeding with any work. 35. MSE walls shall be designed based on a specific geotechnical report identifying the design criteria for this specific project. 41 -- - - - -- — City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX 36. Accessible paths of travel are required from accessible spaces to the entrances of accessible units. 37. Limits of the MSE wall mesh/grid system shall be shown on the grading plan showing areas that shall not be interrupted where the mesh/grid system is in- place. 38. Plan 2 for the 60x70 lots shall be designed as a two-family dwelling per CRC 302.3 with a fire and sound -rated separation between each combination considered a dwelling unit as defined per CBC 202. 39. At least 10% of condo units in carriage type units shall be accessible as required per CBC 1102A.3 for visitability requirements. 40. Phasing of construction shall be approved by the Community Development Director. Phasing shall be designed to prevent "spot building" (scattered construction of structures) from occurring. Otherwise, a construction staging plan shall be provided and approved by Community Development Director to show how the "spot building" will protect the safety of new owners adjacent to construction. 41. The Building Code edition that permits will be based on will follow the date of building plan check submittal and shall be valid for 180 -days. Permits filed after 180 -days from the plan check submittal date shall meet the Building Code edition in effect at the time of permit issuance. If plans are submitted for Building plan check after January 1, 2014, the 2013 California Building Code will apply including the following: 42. Solar ready roofs shall be provided and laid out in conformance with the California Energy Code Section 110.10. This item may be based on the tentative subdivision map approval. 43. Water heater pipe insulation is required per California Energy Code 150.00)2 with insulation consistent with California Energy Code Table 120.3-A. 44. Field verification of AC units are required to meet energy efficiency requirements outlined in California Energy Code 150.1(b)4. 45. A whole house fan is required per California Energy Code 150.1(c)12. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT, (323) 890-4243, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: U_ 111,1:1111 PIt I[N3► 1. Access shall comply with Section 503 of the Fire Code, which requires all weather access. All weather access may require paving. 42 -- City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX 2. Fire Department Access shall be extended to within 150 feet distance of any exterior portion of all structures. 3. Where driveways extend further than 150 feet and are of single access design, turnarounds suitable for fire protection equipment use shall be provided and shown on the final map. Turnarounds shall be designed, constructed and maintained to insure their integrity for Fire Department use. Where topography dictates, turnarounds shall be provided for driveways that extend over 150 feet in length. 4. Private driveways shall be indicated on the final map as "Private Driveway and Firelane" with the widths clearly depicted and shall be maintained in accordance with the Fire Code. All required fire hydrants shall be installed, tested and accepted prior to construction. 5. Vehicular access must be provided and maintained serviceable throughout construction to all required fire hydrants. All require fire hydrants shall be installed, tested and accepted prior to construction. 6. Provide Fire Department or City approved street signs and building access number prior to occupancy. 7. The final map shall be submitted to our office for review and approval prior recordation. B. WATER SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS 1. Provide water mains, fire hydrants and fire flows as required by the County of Los Angeles Fire Department, for all land shown on map which shall be recorded. 2. The required fire flow for public fire hydrants at this location is 3500 gallons per minute at 20 psi for a duration of 3 hours, over and above maximum daily domestic demand. 3 hydrant(s) flowing simultaneously may be used to achieve the required fire flow. 3. Fire hydrant requirements are as follows: Install 11 public fire hydrants and upgrade/verify 1 existing public fire hydrant. 4. All hydrants shall measure 6"x 4"x 2'/z" brass or bronze, conforming to current AWWA standard C503 or approved equal. All on-site hydrants shall be installed a minimum of 25 feet from a structure or protected by a two (2) hour rated firewall. • Location: As per map on file with the office. 5. All required fire hydrants shall be installed, tested and accepted or bonded for prior to Final Map approval. Vehicular access shall be provided and maintained serviceable throughout construction. 43 -- - -- - City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX 6. Additional water system requirements will be required when this land is further subdivided and/or during the building permit process. 7. All proposed structures shall be equipped with automatic fire sprinkler systems that are designed and maintain in accordance with NFPA 13. 8. Additional water requirements will be determined by the Fire Prevention Engineering Unit at further development of the site. ME CC! City Council Resolution No. 2013-XX- "Site D" Specific Plan City of Diamond Bar, California Table A-2 VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 72295 REVISED MITIGATION REPORTING AND MONITORING PROGRAM Exhibit A Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 September 2012 Addendum No. 1: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295 Page 44 _ � � , Cempfiance i i�(tiga+fion ; No.1, Mitigation Measure" �', i;Veriicatrop + ) ;_;;);ViFlesfonei ;.. Hydrology and Water Quality Prior to the issuance of grading permits, all drainage facilities and improvements shall be subject to final design City Issuance of 1 and engineering review and approval by the City Engineer and, for those storm drain facilities under County Engineer Grading jurisdiction, by the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW) (Mitigation Measure 4-1). Permits Biological Resources In order to reduce impacts to United States Army Corps of Engineers and Regional Water Quality Control Board (ACOE/RWQCB) and California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) jurisdictional waters, prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director, receipt of any discretionary permits and approval as may be required from the ACOE, RWQCB, and Community Issuance of 2 CDFG and commit to the provision of compensatory jurisdictional resources meeting or exceeding the following Development Grading minimal standards: (1) the on-site and/or off-site replacement of ACOE/RWQCB jurisdictional waters and Director Permits wetlands at a 2:1 ratio, (2) the on-site and/or off-site replacement of CDFG jurisdictional streambed and associated riparian habitat at a 2:1 ratio; and (3) the incorporation of design features into the project's design and development enhancing the site's biological resources (Mitigation Measure 5-1). Traffic and Circulation Prior to the recordation of the final tract map or issuance of occupancy permits for any residential development, as determined by the City Engineer, the Applicant shall complete, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, those street and intersection improvements identified in the traffic impact analysis or any supplement thereto, provide a Final Tract Map bond or other acceptable instruct committing to those improvements, and/or provide a "fair -share' contribution Recordation toward the cost of the improvements to the following intersections: (1) Brea Canyon Road at Pathfinder Road, (2) City or 3 (ReV15ed) Diamond Bar Boulevard at Pathfinder Road, (3) (3) Diamond Bar Engineer Issuance of Boulevard at Cold Spring Lane, (6) (4) Pathfinder Road at Brea Canyon Cutoff; (6) (Q SR -57 SB Ramps at Brea Occupancy Canyon Cutoff; ($) (6) SR -57 NB Ramps at Brea Canyon Cutoff; (8) M Brea Canyon Road at Diamond Bar Permits Boulevard; (94 (�8 Crooked Creek or Cherrydale Drive at Diamond Bar Boulevard, (4B) (9) Brea Canyon Road at Silver Bullet Drive; (11) 10 Diamond Bar Boulevard at Grand Avenue; and (4-24 (11) Colima Road at Brea Canyon Cutoff (Mitigation Measure 6-1). The final site plan shall include and accommodate those traffic measures, improvements, and such other City Site Plan 4 pertinent factors and/or facilities as may be identified by the City Engineer to ensure the safe and efficient Engineer Approval movement of project -related traffic (Mitigation Measure 6-2). Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 September 2012 Addendum No. 1: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295 Page 44 "Site D" Specific Plan City of Diamond Bar, California Table A-2 (Continued) VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 72295 REVISED MITIGATION REPORTING AND MONITORING PROGRAM N N JGomphance Mitil Measure no :gation :4 1 �Mil stone� A Air Quality Site watering shall be conducted a minimum of three times daily during site preparation activities within disturbed Building Construction 5 areas lacking ground coverage (Mitigation Measure 7-1). Inspector Term Noise In accordance with the Development Code, construction shall be restricted to between the hours of 7:00 AM and 4L99 7:00 PM on weekdays and Saturdays. No construction shall occur at any time on Sundays or on federal holidays. These days and hours shall also apply any servicing of equipment and to the delivery of construction materials to or from the site (Mitigation Measure 8-1). All construction equipment shall be properly maintained and tuned to minimize noise emissions (Mitigation 7 Measure 8-2). Building Construction Inspector Term All equipment shall be fitted with properly operating mufflers, air intake silencers, and engine shrouds no less 8 effective than originally equipped (Mitigation Measure 8-3). The construction contractor shall place temporary noise barriers along the site perimeter when doing any work 9 within 100 feet of any existing residential units. Where feasible, such barriers shall attempt to block the line of sight between the residents and construction equipment (Mitigation Measure 8-4). The construction contractor shall specify the use of electric stationary equipment (e.g., compressors) that can city 10 operate off the power grid where feasible. Where infeasible, stationary noise sources (e.g., generators and Engineer compressors) shall be located as far from residential receptor locations as is feasible (Mitigation Measure 8-5). Building Permit Issuance it Construction shall be subject to any and all provisions set forth by the City of Diamond Bar Planning Department Planning (Mitigation Measure 8-6). Manager 12 No residential units shall be located within 830 feet of the SR -57 Freeway's nearest travel lane unless additional sound attention is provided to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director (Mitigation Measure 8-7). Community Development Director Final Tract Map Recordation No residential units shall be located within 130 feet of the centerline of Diamond Bar Boulevard unless additional L 13 sound attention is provided to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director (Mitigation Measure 8-8). Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 September 2012 Addendum No. 1: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295 Page 45 "Site D" Specific Plan City of Diamond Bar, California Table A-2 (Continued) VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 72295 REVISED MITIGATION REPORTING AND MONITORING PROGRAM Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 September 2012 Addendum No. 1: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295 Page 46 ' =Coreplrailce :Mitigation > ,r Nlitilgation Measure `•. ,� �` Verifieatron fYfiCsteing Cultural Resources Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a qualified archaeologist shall be retained by the Applicant and Community approved by the City to monitor all vegetation removal and ground disturbance to a depth of three feet within the Development following portions of the study area: (1) the boundary of SD -Cultural -1; (2) the open valley floor adjacent to SD- Director Issuance of 14 Cultural -1; and (3) the riparian areas that were not previously surveyed due to dense vegetation cover. The and Grading archaeologist will determine if additional monitoring below the depth of three feet is warranted based on soil and City, Permits bedrock conditions and presence/absence of archaeological materials. No archaeological monitoring is required Engineer for ground disturbing activities outside of these monitor areas (Mitigation Measure 11-1). If cultural resources are identified during monitoring of the ground disturbing activities, the archaeologist shall be allowed to temporarily divert or redirect grading or excavation activities in the vicinity of those resources in order to make an evaluation of the find and determine appropriate treatment. Treatment will include the goals of preservation where practicable and public interpretation of historic and archaeological resources. All cultural resources recovered will be documented on California Department of Parks and Recreation Site Forms to be filed with the CHRIS-SCCIC. The archaeologist shall prepare a final report about the monitoring to be filed with the Applicant, the City, and the California Historical Resources Information System South Central Coastal Information Center at the California State University, Fullerton (CHRIS-SCCIC), as required by the California Office of Historic 15 Preservation. The report shall include documentation and interpretation of resources recovered, if any. Interpretation will include full evaluation of the eligibility of SD -Cultural -1 with respect to the California Register of Historic Places and CEQA. The report shall also include all specialists' reports as appendices. The City shall designate repositories in the event that significant resources are recovered. If cultural resources are identified Building Construction during ground disturbing activities that occur outside the designated monitoring area, ground disturbing activities Inspector Term shall be temporarily redirected away from the vicinity of the find until the retained archaeologist is notified by the Applicant. The archaeologist shall coordinate with the Applicant as to the immediate treatment of the find until a proper site visit and evaluation is made by the archaeologist (Mitigation Measure 11-2). If human remains are encountered unexpectedly during construction excavation and grading activities, Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 requires that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin and disposition pursuant to Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources 16 Code. If the remains are determined to be of Native American descent, the County Coroner has 24 hours to notify the California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). The NAHC will then identify the person(s) thought to be the Most Likely Descendent of the deceased Native American, who will then help determine what course of action should be taken in dealing with the remains (Mitigation Measure 11-3). Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 September 2012 Addendum No. 1: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295 Page 46 "Site D" Specific Plan City of Diamond Bar, California - Table A-2 (Continued) VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 72295 REVISED MITIGATION REPORTING AND MONITORING PROGRAM Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 September 2012 Addendum No. 1: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295 Page 47 ComPl9anc+,e, `,�,iMrtrgati'oi No. MjEgatioh6il+rasure ��, Veiififiatiorl is;;•;. ^i`�Ifllestbpe . Cultural Resources (Continued) Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a qualified paleontologist meeting the qualifications established by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontologists shall be retained by the Applicant and approved by the City to develop and Community 17 implement a paleontological monitoring plan. Development of the monitoring plan shall include a site visit by the Development paleontologist prior to initiation of project development in order to determine or delineate sensitive areas. The Director Issuance of ma also erform collections of fossils from the surface and near -surface (Mitigation Measure 11- paleontologist Y p ( 9 Grading 4). Permits The paleontologist shall attend a pre -grade meeting in order to become familiar with the proposed depths and City 18 patterns of grading of the study area (Mitigation Measure 11-5). Engineer 19 The paleontologist shall establish a curation agreement with an accredited facility prior to grading permit issuance City Issuance of Grading (Mitigation Measure 11-6). Engineer Permits A paleontological monitor, supervised by the paleontologist, shall monitor all excavations in the Puente Formation or excavations anticipated to extend into the Puente Formation. If fossils are found during ground -disturbing Building Construction 20 activities, the paleontological monitor shall be empowered to halt the ground -disturbing activities within 25 feet of Inspector Term the find in order to allow evaluation of the find and determination of appropriate treatment (Mitigation Measure 11- 7). The paleontologist shall prepare a final report on the monitoring. If fossils were identified, the report shall contain Community 21 an appropriate description of the fossils, treatment, and curation. A copy of the report shall be filed with the City Development Grading and the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and shall accompany any curated fossils (Mitigation Director Sign -Off Measure 11-8). Aesthetics All pole -mounted or wall -mounted luminaires installed for the purpose of illuminating homes, public park areas, _ private roadways, and driveways shall conform to appropriate lighting standards and demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, that light trespass will not exceed 0.5 horizontal foot candle, as measured at the City Building Permit 22 project boundaries abutting any existing residential use. These standards shall not be applied to any public Engineer Issuance streets or to any entry feature or other City -oriented signage to be constructed on or adjacent to the project site (Mitigation Measure 12-1). Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 September 2012 Addendum No. 1: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295 Page 47 Attachment 2 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT CITY OF DIAMOND BAR -- 21810 COPLEY DRIVE - DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 - TEL. (909) 839-7030 -- FAX (909) 861-3117 AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.3 MEETING DATE: October 8, 2013 CASE/FILE NUMBER: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295, Development Review, and Tree Permit (Planning Case No. PL2013-229) PROJECT LOCATION: "Site D" comprised of approximately 30 acres located at the southeast corner of Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard (Los Angeles County Assessor's Parcel Numbers 8714-002-900, 8714-002-901, 8714-002-902, 8714-002-903 and 8714-015-001). PROPERTY OWNERS: Walnut Valley Unified School District ("WVUSD") and City of Diamond Bar ("City") APPLICANT: Lennar Homes of California, Inc. ("Lennar") 25 Enterprise, Suite 300 Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 Summary On February 21, 2012, the City Council approved the Site D Specific Plan (SDSP), which set forth regulatory criteria to guide the development of this vacant assemblage of parcels, consisting primarily of surplus WVUSD property. The SDSP provides for the development of up to 200 for -sale dwelling units, and requires at least two acres to be set aside and developed as a public neighborhood park. Lennar is currently in escrow to acquire Site D. Lennar proposes to develop a new master -planned, gated residential community consisting of 182 for sale dwelling units within three distinct neighborhood settings, as well as a 4.7 gross acre (2.5 net usable acres) neighborhood public park to be dedicated to the City. The proposed development will serve as a visual gateway into the City with its distinctive identity, incorporate a significant landmark entry feature near the corner of Diamond Bar Boulevard and Brea Canyon Road, and construct public right-of-way enhancements in accordance with the forthcoming Citywide Streetscape Design Standards currently being developed by staff. The following entitlements are being requested: 1. Vesting Tentative Tract Map to subdivide Site D for the development of 182 for - sale dwelling units and a 4.7 gross acre neighborhood public park; 2. Development Review of the proposed architectural and landscape design elements associated with the proposed residential component of Site D; and 3. Tree Permit to remove 83 existing protected trees consisting of 75 Southern Black. Walnuts, 6 Willows, and 2 Coast Live Oaks, and replace them at a 3:1 ratio with 75 Coast Live Oaks and 174 Sycamores, totaling 249 replacement trees to be planted on-site. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution (Attachment 1) recommending approval of the Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Development Review and Tree Permit for Project No. PL2013-229 to the City Council, for the development of 182 for -sale dwelling units and a 4.7 gross acre neighborhood public park, based on the findings of DBMC Sections 21.20.080, 22.22.150, 22.48.040, and 22.38.110, subject to conditions of approval as listed within the draft resolution. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. Site Characteristics The site is a relatively flat plateau with steep slopes facing north and west. The elevation differential falls approximately 100 feet from a high point in the northeast to the low point in the southwest portion of the property. Much of the site is covered with annual grasses, brush and small trees. However there are areas of dense brush and trees located in the central and northern portions of the site. A stand of mature eucalyptus trees is located on the slope adjacent to Diamond Bar Boulevard. Site D is further characterized by the following features: • Three species of protected trees, as listed on the City's tree preservation and protection ordinance exist, including 75 Southern California Black Walnuts, 6 Willows, and 2 Coast Live Oaks. • Foot trails and access roads traverse the site. • A Restricted Use Area (RUA) exists along the rear slope areas coterminous with the property. The RUA is comprised of engineered slopes and designed to transmit surface waters away from the slopes. Page 2 of 20 A small area at the eastern portion of the property drains northerly to Diamond Bar Boulevard. The balance of runoff flows westerly to the Brea Canyon Storm Drain Channel, a concrete -lined flood control channel owned and maintained by the Los Angeles County Flood Control District. Three intermittent blue -line streams flow generally from east to west. 'Blue -line streams" are naturally -occurring watercourses that are depicted on the official maps of the U.S. Geological Survey. Site D Project Area boundaries The site has some site planning challenges due to ancient landslides. The landslides are not currently active (moving), but have created layers of weakness that required designing the site to achieve the minimum code of factors of safety. The preliminary grading plan is designed to comply with the minimum factors of safety by establishing grades that meet certain elevation targets. The site was designed to build the eastern portion of the site (detached single-family lot pads) at a higher elevation, which resulted in the curvature of the private streets and two 16 -foot high retaining walls to separate the two main building pads. The design to build up the buildings pads along the eastern portion of the site also stabilizes the slopes of the existing homes abutting the site. B. Vesting Tentative Tract Map The basic framework for the development of Site D is the underlying tract map. The Vesting Tentative Tract Map proposes to subdivide the property into 63 lots to accommodate the following uses: 47 lots for individual sale of production homes; 4 lots for 73 detached condos (cluster homes); • 1 lot for 62 townhomes; Page 3 of 20 • 9 lots for private streets, and other areas to be owned in common by the HOA; and 2 lots for the neighborhood park to be offered for dedication to the City for public use. The park will also include stormwater retention improvements to collect clean runoff from the proposed subdivision, as well as existing runoff from the existing upstream development (discussed in more detail later in this report). The acreages corresponding to the above -listed uses are provided in the table below: Use Units Proposed Area Townhomes 62 3.3 acres Single -Family Detached Condo (Cluster Homes) 73 5.9 acres Single -Family Detached Lots 60x70 lots) 47 5.7 acres Slopes/Open Space - 5.7 acres Private Streets and Driveways - 4.1 Rain Garden Basin/Park - 3.8 Park - 0.9 Right -of -Way Dedicated to Cit - 0.5 Total 182 29.5 C. Residences Lennar proposes to construct 182 for -sale dwellings, and market the community under the name "Willow Heights." Willow Heights will consist of three distinct neighborhoods, each defined by its own housing type: • Townhomes (62 units)—Traditional attached condos o Eleven structures, each including four to six units. o Each structure is three stories in height, with a maximum building height of 35 feet, measured from the finished grade to the highest architectural projection. o Four floor plans with livable areas ranging from 1,491 – 2,034 square feet. • Cluster Homes (73 units)—Single-family detached condos o Clusters of four and six detached units. o Two story homes with a maximum building height of 32 feet. o Three floor plans with livable areas ranging from 1,787 – 2,025 square feet. Page 4 of 20 • 60 x 70 Lots (47 units)—Traditional single-family homes on individual lots o Lot sizes ranging from 4,169 square feet to 7,867 square feet and minimum dimensions of 60 -foot width and 70 -foot depth. o Two story homes with maximum building height at 29 feet. o Two floor plans with livable areas ranging from 2,851 – 3,395 square feet. Some of these homes include a secondary master suite, called multi -generation homes (marketed by Lennar as "NextGen – The Home within a Home"). The intent of these multi -generation homes is to provide a flexible space that is connected to the main living areas of the home, but contains its separate space. It provides homeowners with a space that could be used for a variety of uses and lifestyles such as a secondary master bedroom suite, an entertainment area, a guest suite, a college student or live-in relative. The secondary master suite is 462 square feet in size and included in Plan 2. It is attached to the primary residence with a separate entrance, living area, bedroom, wet bar, and laundry unit. These homes will be required as part of the CC&R's and conditions of project approval to prohibit the sale of the suite separate from the primary residence, a cooktop kitchen facility, and separate metered utilities in order to discourage the renting of the space. All utilities serving this suite shall be common to and dependent on the primary residence. D. Neighborhood Park The development incorporates a 4.7 gross area neighborhood public park, which contains a 0.9 acre of land located west of the Brea Canyon Flood Control Channel, and 3.8 acres of land located east of the Brea Canyon Flood Control Channel. The 3.8 acre parcel includes the "Rain Garden" and a paseo along the southwestern portion of the site. The park is comprised of the following features: • Rain Garden. The Rain Garden serves a dual purpose as a public recreational amenity, and as a private stormwater collection facility for the residential development. The detention basin captures storm waters during storm events and detains those waters on the site and then discharges to the Brea Canyon Channel during non -peak periods. The detention basin also serves as a passive public recreational facility with an educational, recycled water feature; landscaping incorporating drought tolerant, native habitat; walking trails; and shade structures and benches. It is modeled after the Aliso Viejo facility, which is very similar to the one being proposed. Photos of the site are attached to the conceptual park plans in Attachment 4. The precise location of amenities in the Rain Garden will be finalized and reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Department and City Council at a later date. Page 5 of 20 • Walking Trail. An approximately 600 -foot long, 38 -foot wide pedestrian trail/emergency access road is proposed along the southwesterly boundary of the site. Pedestrian access is at the end of Pasado Drive, which leads to the Rain Garden and pedestrian bridge over the Brea Canyon Flood Control Channel. • Pedestrian Bridge. A bridge over the Brea Canyon Flood Control Channel will provide pedestrian and maintenance vehicle access, and link the neighborhood park to the 0.9 acre park area along Brea Canyon Road, west of the Channel. • Entry Feature. An entry feature will be located in proximity to the corner of Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard. This feature will serve as a prominent landmark to mark the key entrance into the City. The precise location will be determined when the design of the park is finalized. The design of this feature will be consistent with the ongoing Citywide Streetscape Design Standards related to City branding, with a value not less than one half of one percent (0.5%) of the building permit valuation of the development. • Trail Head Parking. The precise configuration and number of parking spaces for the neighborhood park, along with the connection to the trail system along Brea Canyon Road will be finalized at a later date. The conceptual park plans is derived from the community consensus design and is included in Attachment 4. The precise plan for the park is not part of this review, and will be presented to the Parks and Recreation Department and City Council at a later date. Lennar will be required to construct the park to City standards and dedicate it to the City after a 120 -day landscaping establishment period. The park will be required to be in turn -key condition prior to the issuance of building permits for the 100th dwelling unit. During the Site. D community outreach workshops in 2011, the preferred location for the neighborhood park was along the existing flood control channel. The SDSP, however, envisioned the neighborhood park site near the terminus of Pasado Drive with vehicular access to the park through a public street at Cherrydale and Diamond Bar Boulevard, with additional pedestrian access at the end of Pasado Drive. The Specific Plan did not foresee a viable use of the strip of land along Brea Canyon Road, and was therefore not viewed to be a park site since the land was less than the minimum two usable acres requirement. With input from the park design charette in January 2013, Lennar came up with a creative use of the land along Brea Canyon Road by providing a link between the two parcels via a pedestrian bridge, enabling the park to be sites as shown on the submitted plans. This land use arrangement also allows all project streets to be private, which helps in the marketing efforts for Willow Heights, and relieves the City of an obligation to maintain an additional roadway. Page 6 of 20 E. Access and Internal Circulation • Primary access from Diamond Bar Boulevard at Cherrydale will serve as the spine road for the tract (shown as "A" street on the Tentative Tract Map), and terminates as a cul-de-sac in the southeast corner of the project site (i.e. the uppermost point on the property). The development will be gated with an entry kiosk for call box directory for visitors. The internal streets serving the residential development will be private roadways maintained by the homeowners association. • Secondary, emergency -only access will be provided at the cul-de-sac of Pasado Drive, and will also be gated. The access way from Pasado Drive will be restricted to pedestrian -only, and will be an entrance into the neighborhood public park from the adjoining neighborhood. Upon entrance from Pasado Drive, there will be a linear paved pathway/trail along the southerly boundary of the site. The interior roadway layout is primarily guided by the organization of land uses within the subdivision, as well as site-specific topographic and geotechnical factors. The internal streets are designed to accommodate parallel guest parking spaces, which has been approved by the County of Los Angeles Fire Department. Vehicular access and parking for the neighborhood park, if ultimately desired, will be provided at Brea Canyon Road to a small parking area on the strip of land west of the Brea Canyon Flood Control Channel. The Traffic Impact Report analyzed the feasibility of a direct vehicular access to the neighborhood park from Brea Canyon Road. Site and Surrounding General Plan, Zoning and Land Uses The following table provides the surrounding land uses located adjacent to the subject site. Page 7 of 20 General Plan Designation Zoning District Land Use Site Specific Plan S ecific Plan Vacant Diamond Bar Blvd., North Low -Medium Residential RLM Church and Single -Family Residential South Low Density Residential RL, RLM Single -Family Residential East Low Density Residential RL Single -Family Residential Brea Canyon Road, WestProfessional Office C-1 Gas Station and Professional Office Buildings Page 7 of 20 ANALYSIS: Review Authority rDiamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Sections 21.20.130, 22.48 and 22.381 The proposed project requires three entitlement applications for review. The Vesting Tentative Tract Map for the subdivision of land requires City Council approval. The Development Review for the site plan and architectural components of the project and Tree Permit to remove existing protected trees require Planning Commission approval. DBMC Section 22.48.030 requires all applications to be processed simultaneously by the highest review authority. Therefore, the Planning Commission's role in this matter is to forward a recommendation to the City Council for the three entitlements described below. Vesting Tentative Tract Map (Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 21.20.130) Pursuant to Section 66424 of the Subdivision Map Act, a Tentative Tract Map is required to establish separate residential and open space parcels, create an internal circulation system and common open space areas, and establish easements and other rights-of-way for utility and other purposes. A Vesting Tentative Tract Map confers a vested right to proceed with development in substantial compliance with the requirements in effect at the time the vesting tentative map was approved. In other words, a Vesting Tentative Tract Map locks in the rules and regulations in place at the time of approval. The subdivision of the project site creates separate development areas within the subject property that can be conveyed to subsequent holders of real property interests, as well as establish an internal circulation system and common open space areas. There are 182 units proposed within the development, to be governed by a homeowners association (HOA). The private streets, open space/landscaped areas within the development will be part of the common areas to be maintained by the HOA. The project will be subject to Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs), which will be subject to review and approval by the City Attorney prior to the issuance of building permits and/or Final Map approval. The developer will construct the entire neighborhood park and dedicate it to the City, and after an initial establishment period, the park will be maintained by the City. However, the storm drain structures and related appurtenances including the outlet to the Rain Garden will be maintained by the HOA. The developer will contribute a lump sum payment to contribute to the operations and maintenance of the Rain Garden area since it serves a dual purpose. The development of the project site will be designed with a common landscape and architectural theme. Trails and sidewalks will be provided to allow easy access to each use from within the project and from the surrounding community. Page 8 of 20 Development Review (DBMC Section 22.48) The purpose of Development Review (DR) is to establish consistency with the General Plan through the promotion of high aesthetic and functional standards to complement and add to the economic, physical, and social character of the City. The process ensures that new development and intensification of existing development yields a pleasant living environment, and attracts the interest of residents and visitors as the result of consistent exemplary design. The proposed development is designed according to the development standards and design guidelines contained in the SDSP and incorporate the following features: • Green, Sustainable Development: Provides a green and sustainability model requirement looking at energy efficiency, healthy indoor air quality, waste reduction, water efficiency, use of renewable and recyclable materials for building construction, etc. In addition, landscape irrigation will be designed for future reclaimed water connection. • Building Setbacks: The buildings will have 30 -foot setbacks from Diamond Bar Boulevard and along the perimeter of the project site. The building elevations along street view are articulated and diversified. The street section below shows the building and landscaped slope areas from the street view. _. - xa s JAI 4, >lon �-F�FASPELFON SXT9 Street Section of Diamond Bar Boulevard • Landscaped Setbacks: There are 30 -foot landscaped setbacks that will provide screening and buffering around the site's boundaries. A dense stand of Sycamore and Oak trees—to replace the Walnuts and Oaks removed as part of the project—is proposed to be planted within the large slopes abutting the existing residences. • Retaining Walls: Three-foot high, integral color split -face retaining walls will be constructed along Diamond Bar Boulevard with hedges to cover the face of the Page 9 of 20 walls in order to soften its visual appearance. Two 16 -foot high plantable crib walls (Verdura walls) will also be constructed as retaining walls, which are filled with suitable backfill and live vegetation planted in the individual cells. Flowering evergreen vines will be planted at the top of the slope to provide for cascading plantings to further landscape the wall. • Fences and Walls: Three styles of decorative, privacy, and security walls are proposed: 1) plastered masonry block walls located in the vicinity of the entry gate; 2) wrought iron fences behind the rear yards of the detached single-family condos along Diamond Bar Boulevard; and 3) vinyl fences in the side yards of each unit. • Private Internal Streetscape Requirements: There will be canopy trees such as Brisbane Box and Crape Myrtle trees planted along the private internal streets. Special landscape treatment and decorative textured pavement will be provided at the intersection of Cherrydale and the shared main driveway. The entry walls and directory kiosk is required to have decorative pilasters such as stacked stone or other materials. Page 10 of 20 The following table compares the proposed project with the City's development standards in the SDSP: 'A limited number of wall segments are being proposed at 6 feet in height for retaining walls associated with the lot pads due to grade differences between "A" Street and abutting residential lots. The Community Development Director authorized under the provisions of the SDSP. The SDSP assumes that there would be modifications to the development standards with a project -specific application, and that the eventual development plan for Site D would not precisely follow the diagrams and other minor criteria set forth in the document. The criteria in the Specific Plan served were therefore primarily focused Page 11 of 20 200 182 Yes Setbacks to be determined at project Varies by housing type Yes 4 level a Setbacks to be determined at project Varies by housing type Yes level �; al 10' 10' Yes Setbacks to be determined at project Varies by housing type Yes level t Maximum of 60% 42% Yes X� :< Minimum 15% 59% 35' with architectural 35' 8" s projection up to 40, Yes q 2 -car garage per unit y plus 1 guest space for 2 -car garage per unit every 3 required plus 122 guest spaces Yes n space Maximum 18 -foot high 16' high retaining walls retaining walls associated with the associated with the buildingads; p building pads; 6' high retaining walls Yes" Maximum 4' high associated with the lot M. retaining walls pads associated with the lot pads 'A limited number of wall segments are being proposed at 6 feet in height for retaining walls associated with the lot pads due to grade differences between "A" Street and abutting residential lots. The Community Development Director authorized under the provisions of the SDSP. The SDSP assumes that there would be modifications to the development standards with a project -specific application, and that the eventual development plan for Site D would not precisely follow the diagrams and other minor criteria set forth in the document. The criteria in the Specific Plan served were therefore primarily focused Page 11 of 20 on setting forth the guiding principles for a subsequent developer, and it was the intent to determine appropriate setbacks inside the development at the project level. • Site and Grading Configuration: The site grading was designed around geotechnical constraints of the site. There are two main building pads: 1) townhome and detached single-family condo neighborhoods; and 2) detached single-family neighborhood. These two main pads are located on different elevation levels, separated by two 16 -foot high Verdura walls (interlocking, stackable, plantable wall system). The detached single-family lots are created at a higher elevation towards the southeast portion of the site with the private street climbing to the east and south into the individual single family lots. The lower pad consists of two tiers, with the townhomes on the lower tier and the single- family detached condos on the upper tier. The entire site will be grubbed (removed of existing vegetation), graded, and recontoured to accommodate the residential development, park facilities, and circulation system. • Architectural Features, Colors, and Material: The SDSP's Design Guidelines provided a general framework for architecture, landscaping, entry feature, and signage in order to ensure a high quality development. The overall goal is to create a development that builds upon and complements the existing surrounding community. The guidelines insure a unified theme throughout the project site with a sense of community. The goal is to create the impression of a small village, which can be achieved through a diversity of style, smooth transitions between structures and enhanced neighborhood hardscape and landscape features. Each housing type has varied architectural building details, finishes and treatment on the elevations, and there is diversity between the units from street view. The key features for each product line are listed below: • Townhomes ➢ Two architectural styles: Spanish and Italian. ➢ Articulation of facades and the massing of structures gives depth and substance. ➢ Integration of varied texture, relief, and design accents on building walls softens the architecture. ➢ Variation in details around the entry door to create individuality between units. ➢ Varied window enhancements are thoughtfully arranged and balanced, and recessed to provide depth to the fagade of the building. ➢ Entry doors are recessed with roof elements or alcoves. ➢ Roof rafters, metalwork, and wainscot are provided to create interest; and ➢ Large eave overhangs. Page 12 of 20 • Cluster Homes (Detached Single -Family Condo) ➢ Two architectural styles: Italian and Tuscan. ➢ Good streetscape diversity on the units facing Diamond Bar Boulevard and private streets. ➢ Created individuality of each unit that face street view, distinguished from adjoining units. ➢ Entrances have a porch or pediment ➢ Incorporated stone veneer or wainscots around the base of the buildings and detailed cornice/frieze element below the edges of the roof. ➢ Banding to break up the first and second floors. ➢ Trim around the corners of the exterior walls. • 60x70 Lots (Detached Single -Family Homes) ➢ Two exterior styles: Spanish and Tuscan. ➢ Has a higher caliber of design detail and materials. Varied window enhancements are thoughtfully arranged and balanced. ➢ Entry doors are recessed with roof elements or alcoves. ➢ Incorporated simulated limestone around the base of the buildings, and detailed cornice/frieze element or exposed rafter tails below the edges of the roof. • Landscaping: A conceptual landscape plan was submitted with the application. The landscape design will be very attractive and introduces a mix of evergreen and deciduous trees and shrubs, some that flower and others that display colorful foliage for year-round interest. This plant palette is not only visible within the development, but also at the entrance to the City, along Diamond Bar Blvd. The proposed plant palette ties in with the natural surroundings through the use of Oaks and Sycamore trees as focal and open space plantings. These trees are located at the project entry as well as within slope plantings, and will provide for large scale canopy trees. Brisbane Box, Peppermint Willow and Crape Myrtle trees will be utilized along streetscapes and pedestrian paseos to establish the overall verdant character of the development. Through the combination of decorative themed walls and paving, street trees, an attractive drought -tolerant plant palette with a mix of ornamental and native plants, this well-planned landscape will create a unique sense of place that further enriches Diamond Bar's urban forest. The project is also required to comply with the new water - efficient landscape requirements, which will be verified during building plan check. Tree Permit (DBMC Section 22.38.110) Tree Permits are required when the removal or protection of a protected tree is requested. A protected tree is any of the following: • Native oak, walnut, sycamore and willow trees with a diameter at breast height Page 13 of 20 (DBH) of eight inches or greater; . • Trees of significant historical or value as designated by the City Council; • Any tree required to be preserved or relocated as a condition of approval for a discretionary permit; • Any tree required to be planted as a condition of approval for a discretionary permit; and • A stand of trees, the nature of which makes each tree dependent upon the others for survival. The Development Code requires the preservation and maintenance of Coast Live Oak and California Walnut trees with a DBH of eight inches or greater. When removal is allowed as a result of new development on residential sites larger than 20,000 square feet, replacement trees shall be planted at a 3:1 ratio. The project requires the removal of 83 existing protected trees consisting of 75 Southern California Black Walnuts, 6 Willows, and 2 Coast Live Oaks. The applicant is proposing to replant native Oak and Sycamore trees instead of Southern Black Walnut trees because Southern Black Walnuts have a tendency to have a weak branching structure and are prone to splitting. In addition, these trees do not have a lot of inventory in the local nurseries. The replacement trees will be planted at a 3:1 ratio with 75 Coast Live Oak and 174 Sycamore trees, totaling 249 replacement trees, to be a minimum 24 -inch box size. Traffic/Circulation Based on the traffic analysis report, 20 key intersection capacity analyses were conducted. The proposed project will not cause any intersections or street segments in the vicinity to operate at an unacceptable level of service with the mitigation measures and improvements listed below. The existing roadways will be improved as part of the residential development. The development's obligations toward the existing, and plus project traffic conditions will be improved through the following: Circulation Plan Primary vehicular entryway/access will be via a new signalized intersection located at Cherrydale Drive. The primary access will consist of an 85 -foot wide right-of-way consisting of a 25 -foot and 26 -foot wide travel lanes, 14 -foot wide median, 5 -foot wide curb -adjacent parkway, and a 5 -foot wide sidewalk aligning both sides of the street, and emergency -only access to the project site will be provided from Pasado Drive. The internal private street configuration, widths, and circulation are sufficient and has been reviewed and approved by the County of Los Angeles Fire Department. Page 14 of 20 Traffic Improvements • Brea Canyon Road at Diamond Bar Boulevard: 1) Widen and/or restripe northbound Brea Canyon Road to provide a second dedicated right -turn lane; 2) Widen and/or restripe the eastbound departure on Diamond Bar Boulevard to provide a third through lane along the project frontage; 3) Modify the existing median and restripe the westbound approach on Diamond Bar Boulevard to provide a second left -turn lane; and 4) Maintain the existing bike lane on Diamond Bar Boulevard along the entire project frontage. The implementation of these improvements may require some modification to existing traffic signal equipment (i.e. re-cut/install new vehicle loop detectors, modification to traffic signal controller). • Cherrydale Drive at Diamond Bar Boulevard: 1) Provide an option left/through lane and a separate right -turn lane on the northbound approach; 2) Restripe southbound approach to provide an option left/through/right-turn lane on Cherrydale; 3) Widen eastbound approach to provide a third through lane along the project frontage; 4) Widen the eastbound approach to provide a separate right -turn lane; 5) Modify median and restripe Diamond Bar Boulevard to provide a single westbound left -turn lane; 6) Install traffic signal; and 7) Maintain the existing bike lane on Diamond Bar Boulevard along the entire project frontage. The implementation of this improvement may require some modification to existing signing and striping to affected streets. • The applicant will also be required to pay fair -share fees of the construction costs to implement additional improvements to mitigate the cumulative traffic impacts of existing traffic, future non -project traffic, and project traffic. Compliance with Hillside Management Ordinance (DBMC Section 22.22) The proposed project was reviewed for compliance with the City's Hillside Management Design Guidelines and regulations. The project complies with all of the regulations and guidelines to ensure that development will complement the character and topography of hillside areas set forth in the Development Code. The project site was designed to conform to the following requirements: • 16 -foot high Verdura walls are lower than the maximum 18 -foot high retaining walls prescribed in the SDSP. • Exposed heights of retaining walls supporting fill slopes along the project perimeter and entry drive does not exceed four feet. .. Finished slopes are not greater than 50 percent (2:1). • Earth tone building materials and color schemes are used that blend in with the natural landscape. Page 15 of 20 Landscaping is used to screen view of down slope building elevations, and slopes are planted with informal clusters of trees and shrubs to soften and vary the slope plane. In addition, the Verdura walls are not only plantable crib walls, but flowering evergreen vines will be planted at the top of the slope to further landscape the wall. The project complies with all of the regulations and guidelines to ensure that development will complement the character and topography of hillside areas set forth in the Development Code. Compatibility with Neighborhood The proposed project complies with the goals, objectives and land use criteria as set forth in the adopted General Plan and SDSP in terms of land use. The design and appearance of the proposed residential development is compatible with the surrounding community. The proposed development is designed to be compatible and complementary to the neighborhood, and conforms to the SDSP as well as incorporates the principles of the City's Residential Design Guidelines as follows: • Quality Housing. The project contributes to the diversity of the City's housing stock with an attractive housing development accommodating people of all ages, cultures, occupations and levels of financial status; and will serve as a visual gateway into the City with its distinctive identity. • Buffer from existing homes. The project is designed to minimize the negative impacts on the surrounding homes. A transition between the development and adjacent homes is achieved through 30 -foot wide landscaped setbacks around the entire site. A dense stand of Sycamore and Oak trees is proposed to be planted within the large slopes abutting the existing residences. Therefore a landscaping buffer will be maintained in order to provide some distance from existing residences along Ambusher Street, Pasado Drive, and Cold Springs Lane. • View Impacts from Neighboring Homes. The development is designed to create a minimal visual impact to the adjacent homes by building the new dwellings downhill on a lower pad level than the existing homes in the vicinity in order to retain view corridors. • Neighborhood Public Park. The project creates a community environment which nurtures social and recreational opportunities for its residents. The conceptual park plan is derived from the community consensus design. As a requirement of the SDSP, Lennar solicited input from the residents on the design and types of amenities they would like to see incorporated into the future neighborhood park. The participants were generally supportive of the proposed park layout, and there was consensus regarding the types and locations for a number of amenities and features. A summary of the workshops is attached to this report (Attachment 3). Page 16 of 20 • Entry Feature. The project offers an aesthetically pleasing development incorporating community identity through a significant landmark entry feature at the corner of Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard to mark the entrance into the City. • Public Streetscape Improvements: Landscaped parkways with street trees, sidewalks, and bike trails will be required along Diamond Bar Boulevard; and the project will conditioned to comply with the Streetscape designs in the Grand Avenue Beautification Plan (Citywide Streetscape Design Standards), and incorporate tree wells, bus shelters, fencing and wall, within the public right-of-way. There is no view protection standard in the City's development regulations. However in light of the landslide issue, the southeasterly portion of the site needs to be elevated more than envisioned in some of the graphics presented during the SDSP review hearings. Therefore, staff required a viewshed analysis which is included in the Addendum to the FEIR (Attachment 2). The proposed development will respect the views of existing residential uses abutting the site. The buildings are located in a manner that preserves the views and is kept as low as possible to reduce or eliminate the possibility of blocking views of existing residences. The applicant lowered the building pads by approximately 10 feet for the lots that most impacts the neighbors located to the south of the development, on Ambushers Street. Below is a key map that illustrates the viewsheds from rear yards of the five existing residences located on Ambushers Street. The views are measured from ground level. The visual simulations are attached to the viewshed analysis in the Addendum to the FEIR. Page 17 of 20 1 \\ 1 � Pe l_ V P/SA00 OR v a ' a KEY MAP HLINSAKER&ASSOCIATES I N E I N C k'i 0? �� k'i �f) %1NWNG • ENfJNFfAMO SLWVMNC SCA:L: 1' - SO' � xyn � NYe U V W . Nf UM WiJp •R WM NW59 Key Vantage Points The existing five single-family residences are approximately 120 - 197 feet away from the nearest buildings in the development, and are located on an approximately 10 -foot higher building pad than the proposed homes in the development. The building pads of these residences sit on a higher grade elevation than the proposed buildings, and therefore will not impact any private viewsheds enjoyed by these properties. The existing residences along Ambushers Street will retain the views, as well as screen view where appropriate, with heavily landscaped slopes along the site's easterly and southern boundaries. Additional Review The Community Services and Public Works/Engineering Departments, Building and Safety Division, as well as the County of Los Angeles Fire Department reviewed this project and included their comments in the attached resolution as conditions of approval (Attachment 1). NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: Public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 1,000 -foot radius of the project site on September 26, 2013, and to all speakers who have previously attended the Planning Commission and City Council hearings on the SDSP and community Page 18 of 20 workshops. The notice was also published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin and San Gabriel Valley Tribune newspapers on September 27, 2013. The project site was posted with a notice display board, and a copy of the public notice was posted at the City's three designated community posting sites. Public Comments Received At the time the staff report was published, staff had not received any comments from the public. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City certified the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the SDSP on February 21, 2012. The FEIR analyzed the potential environmental impacts resulting from the SDSP's approval from both a programmatic and project -level perspective, analyzing the development of the project site for residential and recreational uses with accompanying on-site and off-site infrastructure improvements. With the submittal of a project -specific application, an Addendum to the FEIR has been prepared, which includes minor technical changes and additions in order to determine the project's consistency with the SDSP. The proposed project is in substantial conformance with the SDSP and the attached Addendum to the FEIR (Attachment 2) documents that no new environmental issues has been identified and states the reasons to support the findings that the proposed project would not have any potentially significant impacts on the environment with the proposed mitigation measures included. A mitigation reporting and monitoring program (MRMP) has been prepared, which address site-specific conditions for the project. The purpose of the MRMP is to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures. The program also identifies the timing and responsibility for monitoring each measure and is attached as an exhibit to the Addendum (Attachment 2) and Resolution (Attachment 1). The project is conditioned to include these mitigation measures as part of project approval. ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION In addition to staff's recommendation, the following alternatives have been identified: 1. Continue the item for additional information. 2. Deny the Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Development Review, and Tree Permit, specifically identifying the reasons the required findings of DBMC Sections 21.20.080, 22.48.040, and 22.38.110 cannot be made; and/or recommend that the City Council deny Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Development Review, and Tree Permit, specifically identifying the reasons the required findings of DBMC Sections 21.20.080, 22.48.040, and 22.38.110 cannot be made. Page 19 of 20 Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution (Attachment 1) recommending approval of the Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Development Review and Tree Permit for Project No. PL2013-229 to the City Council, to allow the subdivision for the development of 182 for -sale dwelling units and a 4.7 gross acre neighborhood public park, based on the findings of DBMC Sections 21.20.080, 22.48.040, and 22.38.110, subject to conditions of approval as listed within the draft resolution. Prepared by: d Gra S. Lee Senior Planner Attachments: Reviewed by: /jji' Greg Gubman, AICP Community Development Director 1. Draft PC Resolution No. 2013 -XX and Standard Conditions of Approval 2. Addendum to Site D Specific Plan Final EIR 3. Summary of Community Workshops 4. Tentative Tract Map, Conceptual Grading, Architectural, Landscape Plans and Conceptual Park Plan Page 20 of 20 Attachment 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2013-23 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 72295, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND TREE PERMIT PLANNING CASE NO. PL2013-229 TO CONSTRUCT 182 RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND 2.5 NET ACRE NEIGHBORHOOD PUBLIC PARK LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BREA CANYON ROAD AND DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD, DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 (ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 8714-002-900, 8714-002-901, 8714-002-902, 8714-002-903 AND 8714-015-001) AND DETERMINING ASSOCIATED CONTEMPLATED DISPOSITIONS AND ACQUISTIONS OF PROPERTY ARE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN. A. RECITALS 1. The Subject Property is currently comprised of five parcels totaling 30 acres (Assessor's Parcel Numbers are 8714-002-900, 8714-002-901, 8714-002-902, 8714-002-903, and 8714-015-001). The Walnut Valley Unified School District owns approximately 29 acres, and the City of Diamond Bar owns a 0.98 acre strip of land along Brea Canyon Road, east of the Brea Canyon Flood Control Channel. A 0.67 acre segment of a flood control channel, owned and maintained by the Los Angeles County Flood Control District, separates the City and School District properties. The Subject Property is located in the Site D Specific Plan zone with a General Plan land use designation of Specific Plan located at the southeast corner of Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard, Diamond Bar, Los Angeles County, California ("Project Site"). 2. On February 21, 2012, the Diamond Bar City Council approved the Site D Specific Plan (SDSP), which set forth regulatory criteria to guide the development of the vacant, undeveloped 30 -acre Site D Project area. The SDSP provides for the development of up to 200 for -sale dwelling units, and requires at least two acres to be set aside and developed as a public neighborhood park. In conjunction with approval of the SDSP, on February 21, 2012, the Diamond Bar City Council certified "Final Environmental Impact Report — 'Site D' Specific Plan, SCH No. 2008021014" (FEIR), and adopted "Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Consideration" for each of the significant environmental impacts identified in the FEIR and each of the alternatives presented therein. From both a programmatic and project -level perspective, the FEIR analyzed the potential environmental impacts resulting from the SDSP's approval, the development of the Project Site for residential, recreational, and open space uses; the construction of housing, a recreational facility, and accompanying on-site and off-site infrastructure improvements; the occupancy of that housing and the public use of the recreational facility; and the on-going operation, habitation, use, and maintenance of the Project Site. Further, the FEIR envisioned not only the adoption of the SDSP and the land- use entitlements associated therewith, but also the subsequent development of the "Site D" property in a manner generally consistent with the SDSP. 3. The Applicant, Lennar Homes of California, Inc., filed an application for the following entitlements: (1) Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295 to subdivide an existing vacant 30 -acre lot into 63 lots for the development of 182 for -sale dwelling units and a 2.5 net usable acre neighborhood public park; (2) Development Review of the proposed architectural and landscape design elements associated with the proposed residential component of Site D, and (3) Tree Permit to remove 83 existing protected trees consisting of 75 Southern Black Walnuts, 6 Willows, and 2 Coast Live Oaks, and replace them at a 3:1 ratio with 75 Coast Live Oaks and 174 Sycamores, totaling 249 replacement trees to be planted on-site. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Development Review, and Tree Permit shall be collectively referred to as the 'Project." 4. In conjunction with the Project, it is contemplated (a) that the Walnut Valley Unified School District and the City of Diamond Bar will transfer their respective interests in the Project Site to the Applicant, or its successor or assign, and (2) that the City will accept dedication of a maximum of 4.3 acres of property (designated as Lots 62 and 63 on Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295) for public park purposes from Applicant or its successor or assign. Government Code Section 65402 provides that if there is an applicable general plan, no real property shall be acquired by dedication or otherwise for street, square, park or other public purposes, and no real property shall be disposed of, until the location, purpose and extent of such acquisition or disposition have been reported upon by the planning agency as to conformity with the general plan. 4. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) has been prepared for the Project, which concludes that the Project is in substantial conformance with the SDSP and that no new environmental issues have been identified that would have any potentially significant impacts on the environment with the proposed mitigation measures included. 5. The Planning Commission has independently considered the Addendum, along with the FEIR, and finds, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 21166, that no further environmental documentation is required due to the following reasons: 1) substantial changes are not proposed in the Project which will require major revisions of the FEIR, 2) substantial changes did not occur with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is being undertaken which will require major revisions in the FEIR, and 3) there is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the FEIR was certified as complete, showing that: (a) the Project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the FEIR; (b) significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the FEIR; (c) mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects 2 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-23 L'. of the Project, but the mitigation measures or alternatives have not been adopted; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives considerably different from those analyzed in the FEIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the mitigation measures or alternatives have not been adopted. 6. On September 27, 2013, notification of the public hearing for this Project was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune and the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspapers. Public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 1,000 -foot radius of the Project Site, and to all speakers who have previously attended the Planning Commission and City Council hearing on the SDSP and community workshops. The public notices were posted at the City's designated community posting sites on September 26, 2013. In addition to the published and mailed notices, the Project Site was posted with a display board. 7. On October 8, 2013, the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar conducted a duly noticed public hearing, solicited testimony from all interested individuals, and concluded said hearing on that date. 8. The documents and materials constituting the administrative record of the proceedings upon which the City's decision is based are located at the City of Diamond Bar, Community Development Department, Planning Division, 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765, RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar as follows: 1. That all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein and as prescribed under Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Sections 21.20.080, 22.22, 22.48, and 22.30.050, this Planning Commission hereby finds and recommends as follows: Tentative Map Findings: Pursuant to Subdivision Code Section 21 20.080 of the City's Subdivision Ordinance, the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council make the following findings: 1. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the general plan and any applicable specific plan: The Project is a new master -planned gated residential community consisting of 182 for -sale dwelling units within three distinct neighborhood settings, as well as a 2.5 net usable acre neighborhood public park to be dedicated to the City. The Project is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Specific Plan as well as the Site D Specific Plan in terms of land use, and the design and appearance of the Project is compatible with the surrounding community. 3 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-23 The Project is consistent with the General Plan and Site D Specific Plan as follows: ® Quality Housing. The Project contributes to the diversity of the City's housing stock with an attractive housing development accommodating people of diverse ages, cultures, occupations and levels of financial status; and will serve as a visual gateway into the City with its distinctive identity. ® Buffer from existing homes. The Project is designed to minimize the negative impacts on the surrounding homes. A transition between the development and adjacent homes is achieved through 30 -foot wide landscaped setbacks around the entire site. The setbacks will be densely planted and maintained with Oak and Sycamore trees, and shrubs in order to provide a buffer between the Project and the existing residences along Ambushers Street, Pasado Drive, and Cold Springs Lane. ® View Impacts from Neighboring Homes. The Project is designed to create a minimal visual impact to the adjacent homes by building the new dwellings downhill on lower pad levels than the existing homes in the vicinity in order to retain view corridors. ® Neighborhood Public Park. The Project creates a community environment which nurtures social and recreational opportunities for its residents. The conceptual park plan is derived from a community consensus design produced during a neighborhood design charette. As a requirement of the SDSP, Lennar solicited input from the residents on the design and types of amenities they would like to see incorporated into the future neighborhood park. The participants were generally supportive of the proposed park layout, and there was consensus regarding the types and locations for a number of amenities and features. ® Entry Feature. The Project offers an aesthetically pleasing development incorporating community identity through a significant landmark entry feature at the corner of Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard to mark the entrance into the City. ® Public Streetscape Improvements: Landscaped parkways with street trees, sidewalks, and bike trails will be required along Diamond Bar Boulevard, and the Project will conditioned to comply with Citywide Streetscape Design Standards currently being developed as part of the Grand Avenue Beautification Plan. 2. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development: The Project will be consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Specific Plan and the zoning designation of Site D Specific Plan, which allows for the development of up to 200 for -sale dwelling units and minimum two acre usable neighborhood public park. The Project Site is located within an urbanized area adequately served by existing roadways and infrastructure. The 4 Planning Commission Resolution No 2013-23 Project will not cause any intersections or street segments in the vicinity to operate at unacceptable level of service with the mitigation measures and improvements required as part of the Project approval. Therefore the property is physically able to accommodate the Project. 3. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or injure fish or wildlife or their habitat: In order to demonstrate compliance with applicable state and federal resource protection policies designed to protect or compensate for the loss of biological resources, the following mitigation measures are part of the Project approval and were adopted as part of the Site D Specific Plan approval: ® The applicant is required to demonstrate receipt of any discretionary permits and approval as may be required from the Unites States Army Corps of Engineers and Regional Water Quality Control Board (ACOE/RWQCB) and California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFM and commit to the provision of compensatory jurisdictional resources meeting or exceeding the following minimal standards: (1) the on-site andlor off-site replacement of CDFW jurisdictional waters and wetlands at a 2:1 ratio; (2) the on-site andlor off-site replacement of CDFW jurisdictional streambed and associated riparian habitat at a 2:1 ratio; and (3) the incorporation of design features into the Project's design and development enhancing the site's biological resources. ® Measures to mitigate impacts to California walnut woodland will be orchestrated in concert with the replanting of trees protected by the City's tree preservation and protection ordinance. Prior to final approval of a grading permit or initiation of any activity that involves the removalldisturbance of oak and walnut woodland habitat, the applicant shall develop a detailed tree mitigation plan describing the number, size, and location of compensatory trees to be planted and outline success criteria and adaptive management procedures to ensure that the mitigation plan is successful, and submit the plan to the City for review and approval. Mitigation shall include a minimum replacement ratio of 3:1, totaling 249 replacement trees to be planted on-site. ® As determined feasible by the Community Development Director, initial vegetation removal activities shall be conducted outside the nesting season (February 15 -August 15) to avoid impacts upon nesting birds. If initial vegetation removal activities occur during the nesting season, prior to the commencement of any grading or grubbing activities, all suitable habitat shall first be thoroughly surveyed by a qualified biologist for the presence of nesting birds. if any active nests are detected, a buffer of at least 300 feet (500 feet for raptors) shall be delineated, flagged, and vegetation removal activities avoided therein until the nesting cycle is complete, as determined by the surveying biologist or a qualified biological monitor. 5 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-23 4. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements will not cause serious public health or safety problems: The proposed subdivision or type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health or safety problems because the site has been designed to comply with the minimum factors of safety by establishing grades that meet certain elevation targets. The site was designed to build the southeastern portion of the site (detached single-family lot pads) at a higher elevation. The design to build up the building pads along the southeastern portion of the site also stabilizes the slopes of the existing homes abutting the site. Grading of the Project Site will be conducted in accordance with the recommendations outlined in the Project's geotechnical investigation so as to assure that geotechnical stability is maintained or increased. The on-site circulation and access to the site will not result in unsafe driving conditions. Site access has been analyzed by a traffic engineer and fair -share traffic improvement requirements have been set forth. Ingress and egress to the site has been carefully designed. The internal private street configuration, widths, and circulation are sufficient, which has been reviewed and approved by the County of Los Angeles Fire Department. The interior roadway layout is primarily guided by the organization of land uses within the subdivision, as well as site-specific topographic and geotechnical factors. The site was designed to build the southeastern portion of the site at a higher elevation, which resulted in the curvature of the private streets. 5. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision: There are currently no public easements within Site D; therefore, the Project will not impede any preexisting public access rights. 6. The discharge of sewage from the proposed subdivision into the community sewer system would not result in violation of existing requirements prescribed by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board: The applicant shall construct a sanitary sewer system in accordance with the City, Los Angeles County Public Works Department, and County Sanitation District Standards prior to building occupancy. A condition of project approval requires a fair share payment in the amount of $78,081.60 (based on a 15% impact to the Emergency Storage Capacity at the Castle Rock Pump Station as indicated in the Sewer and Water System Analysis dated September 24, 2013) and $29,438.71 (based on a 3.6% impact to the Emergency Storage Capacity at the Fountain Springs Pump Station as indicated in the Sewer and Water System Analysis dated September 24, 2013), to be accepted by the City prior to the issuance of the final sewer inspection sign off and sewer improvement bond release. The proposed subdivision has been analyzed under the Addendum to the FEIR and found not to violate any requirement of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. 6 Planning Commission Resolution Nn. 2013-23 7. A preliminary soils report or geologic hazard report does not indicate adverse soil or geologic conditions: The grading of the Project Site will be constructed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the recommendations contained in the preliminary geotechnical investigation to assure that geotechnical stability is maintained or increased. 8. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable provisions of the City's subdivision ordinance, the development code, and the subdivision map act: Conformity with the applicable provisions of the Subdivision Map Act, Subdivision Code and Development Code was verified by the City during the technical review of the Project, Any inconsistencies during the review process were corrected prior to the City deeming the Project complete and placing the matter on the Planning Commission public hearing agenda. Moreover, the Project is in substantial conformance with the Site D Specific Plan. Hillside Management Objectives (DBMC Section 22.22) 1. Natural topographic features and appearances are preserved by means of landform grading so as to blend man-made or manufactured slopes into the natural topography: The fundamental shaping of the property will be graded to be consistent with the existing topography. The existing profile of the property will be mimicked and the slopes bordering Diamond Bar Boulevard and the large slopes on the southern end of the property will add to a backdrop to the development. However, to achieve a balanced site, the areas on the northern portion of the property will be at lower elevation than the southeast portion of the property. The southeastern portion of the site will be built on a higher elevation, which results in the curvature of the private streets and two 16 -foot high retaining walls to separate the two main building pads. All finished slopes will be no greater than 50 percent (2: 1). 2. The preservation of Natural topographic features and appearances are preserved through restrictions on successive padding and terracing of building sites: The site grading was designed around geotechnical constraints of the site. There are two main building pads proposed: 1) townhome and detached -single family condo neighborhoods; and 2) detached single-family neighborhood. These two main pads are located on different elevation levels, separated by two 16 -foot high Verdure walls. The detached single-family lots are created at a higher elevation towards the southeast portion of the site with the private street climbing to the east and south into the individual single family lots. The lower 7 Planning Commission Resolution Na. 2013-23 pad consists of two tiers, with the townhomes on the lower tier and the single- family detached condos on the upper tier. 3. Major natural topographic features, drainage courses, steep slopes, watershed areas, vernal pools, view corridors, and scenic vistas are retained: The Project is designed to create minimal visual impact to the adjacent homes by building the new dwellings downhill on a lower pad level than the existing homes in the vicinity in order to retain view corridors. The buildings are located in a manner that preserves the views and is kept as low as possible to reduce or eliminate the possibility of blocking views of existing residences. 4. The preservation and enhancement of prominent landmark features, significant ridgelines, natural rock outcroppings, protected trees and woodlands (chapter 22.38, Tree Preservation and Protection), and other areas of special natural beauty: There are no ridgelines or rock outcroppings within the subject property. The applicant will replant 249 native Oak and Sycamore trees to mitigate the removal of 83 existing protected trees. In addition, the Project is required to incorporate a significant landmark entry feature near the corner of Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard to mark the key entrance into the City. The design of this feature will seek to visually draw from elements of the community and/or history of the City. The removal of the riparian features within the Subject Property was addressed in the Final EIR and will be mitigated accordingly. 5. The utilization of varying setbacks, building heights, foundation designs and compatible building forms, materials, and colors which serve to blend buildings into the terrain: The Project consists of three distinct neighborhoods, each defined by its own housing type on different building elevations/pads. Each housing type has varied architectural building details, finishes and treatment on the elevations, and there is diversity between the units from street view. Earth tone building materials and color schemes are used that blend in with the natural landscape, and landscaping is used to screen view of down slope building elevations, and slopes are planted with informal clusters of trees and shrubs to soften and vary the slope plane. 6. The utilization of clustered sites and buildings on more gently sloping terrain so as to reduce grading alterations on steeper slopes; The entire site will be graded and recontoured to accommodate the Project. The Project consists of three distinct neighborhoods on different elevations/pads. The lower pad consists of two tiers, with the townhomes on the lower tier and the single-family detached condos on the upper tier. The detached single-family lots are created at a higher elevation towards the southeast portion of the site. 8 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-23 7. The utilization of building designs, locations, and arrangements which serve to avoid a continuous intrusive skyline effect and which afford view privacy and protection; The Project will retain views by creating building pads that remain below existing developed sites, maintaining substantial separations between existing and new structures, and limiting the building heights to 35 feet or less, as well as screen for privacy where appropriate, with heavily landscaped slopes along the site's easterly and southern boundaries. 8. The preservation and introduction of plant materials so as to protect slopes from soil erosion and slippage and minimize the visual effects of grading and construction of hillside areas: There are 30 -foot landscaped setbacks that provide screening and buffering around the site's boundaries. A dense stand of Sycamore and Oak trees—to replace the Walnuts and Oaks removed as part of the Project—is proposed to be planted within the large slopes abutting the existing residences. 9. The utilization of street. designs and improvements which serve to minimize grading alterations and harmonize with the natural contours and character of the hillsides: The interior roadway layout is primarily guided by the organization of land uses within the subdivision, as well as site-specific topographic and geotechnical factors. Due to ancient landslides, the site was designed to build the southeastern portion of the site at a higher elevation, which resulted in the curvature of the private streets and two 16 -foot high retaining walls to separate the two main building pads. The design to build up the building pads along the southeastern portion of the site also stabilizes the slopes of the existing homes abutting the site. Development Review Findings QBMC Section 22.48) 1. The design and layout of the proposed development are consistent with the general plan, development standards of the applicable district, design guidelines, and architectural criteria for special areas (e.g., theme areas, specific plans, community plans, boulevards or planned developments): The Project is designed pursuant to the development standards and design guidelines contained in the Site D Specific Plan and incorporates the following features: ® Green, Sustainable Development. Provides a green and sustainability model requirement looking at energy efficiency, healthy indoor air quality, waste reduction, water efficiency, use of renewable and recyclable materials for building construction, etc. In addition, landscape irrigation will be designed for future reclaimed water connection. 9 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-23 • Building Setbacks: The buildings will have 30 -foot setbacks from Diamond Bar Boulevard and along the perimeter of the Project Site. The building elevations along street view are articulated and diversified. • Landscaped Setbacks: There are 30 -foot landscaped setbacks that will provide screening and buffering around the site's boundaries. A dense stand of Sycamore and Oak trees—to replace the Walnuts and Oaks removed as part of the Project—is proposed to be planted within the large slopes abutting the existing residences. Retaining Walls: Three-foot high, integral color split -face retaining walls will be constructed along Diamond Bar Boulevard with hedges to cover the face of the walls in order to soften its visual appearance. Two 16 -foot high Verdura walls will also be constructed as retaining walls, which are filled with suitable backfill and live vegetation planted in the individual cells. Flowering evergreen vines will be planted at the top of the slope to provide for cascading plantings to further landscape the wall. ® Fences and Walls: Three styles of decorative, privacy, and security walls are proposed: 1) plastered masonry block walls located in the vicinity of the entry gate, 2) wrought iron fences behind the rear yards of the detached single-family condos along Diamond Bar Boulevard, and 3) vinyl fences in the side yards of each unit. ® Private Internal Streetscape Requirements: There will be canopy trees such as Brisbane Box and Crape Myrtle trees planted along the private internal streets. Special landscape treatment and decorative textured pavement will be provided at the intersection of Cherrydale and the shared main driveway. 2. The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards: The Project will not interfere with the use or enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments because the Project is designed to minimize the negative impacts on the surrounding homes. A transition between the Project and adjacent homes is achieved through 30 -foot wide landscaped setbacks around the entire site. A dense stand of Sycamore and Oak trees is proposed to be planted within the large slopes abutting the existing residences. Therefore a landscaping buffer will be maintained in order to provide some distance from existing residences along Ambusher Street, Pasado Drive, and Cold Springs Lane. In addition, the Project is designed to create a minimal visual impact to the adjacent homes by building the new dwellings downhill on a lower pad level than the existing homes in the vicinity in order to retain view corridors. The Project will not interfere with vehicular or pedestrian movements, such as access or other functional requirements. A traffic analysis report concluded that the proposed Project will not cause any intersections or street segments in the vicinity to operate at an unacceptable level of service with the mitigation 10 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-23 measures and improvements required as part of Project approval. The existing roadways will be improved as part of the Project. 3. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain and enhance the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by this chapter, the general plan, or any applicable specific plan: The Project is designed to be compatible and complementary to the neighborhood, and conforms to the SDSP as well as incorporates the principles of the City's Residential Design Guidelines as follows: ® Quality Housing. The Project contributes to the diversity of the City's housing stock with an attractive housing development accommodating people of all ages, culture's, occupations and levels of financial status; and will serve as a visual gateway into the City with its distinctive identity. ® Buffer from existing homes. The Project is designed to minimize the negative impacts on the surrounding homes. A transition between the Project and adjacent homes is achieved through 30 -foot wide landscaped setbacks around the entire site. A dense stand of Sycamore and Oak trees is proposed to be planted within the large slopes abutting the existing residences. Therefore a landscaping buffer will be maintained in order to provide some distance from existing residences along Ambusher Street, Pasado Drive, and Cold Springs Lane. • View Impacts from Neighboring Homes. The Project is designed to create a minimal visual impact to the adjacent homes by building the new dwellings downhill on a lower pad level than the existing homes in the vicinity in order to retain view corridors. ® Neighborhood Public Park. The Project creates a community environment which nurtures social and recreational opportunities for its residents. The conceptual park plan is derived from the community consensus design. As a requirement of the SDSP, Lennar solicited input from the residents on the design and types of amenities they would like to see incorporated into the future neighborhood park. The participants were generally supportive of the proposed park layout, and there was consensus regarding the types and locations for a number of amenities and features. ® Entry Feature. The Project offers an aesthetically pleasing development incorporating community identity through a significant landmark entry feature at the corner of Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard to mark the entrance into the City. ® Public Streetscape Improvements: Landscaped parkways with street trees, sidewalks, and bike trails will be required along Diamond Bar Boulevard, and the Project will conditioned to comply with the streetscape designs in the Grand Avenue Beautification Plan (Citywide Streetscape Design 11 Planning Commission Resolution No. 213-23 Standards), and incorporate tree wells, bus shelters, fencing and wall, within the public right-of-way. 4. The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture and color, and will remain aesthetically appealing: The Project will serve as a visual gateway into the City with its distinctive identity, incorporate a significant landmark entry feature near the corner of Diamond Bar Boulevard and Brea Canyon Road, and provide public right-of- way enhancements in accordance with the forthcoming Citywide Streetscape Design Standards currently being developed by staff. In addition, the Project has varied architectural building details, finishes and treatment on the elevations, and there is diversity between the units from street view. 5. The proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious (e.g., negative effect on property values or resale(s) of property) to the properties or improvements in the vicinity: Before the issuance of any City permits, the Project is required to comply with all conditions within the approved resolution, and the Building and Safety Division and Public Works Departments, and L.A. County Fire Department requirements. The referenced agencies through the permit and inspection process will ensure that the Project is not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. 6. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA): The City certified the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the SDSP on February 21, 2012. The FOR analyzed the potential environmental impacts resulting from the SDSP's approval from both a programmatic and project -level perspective, analyzing the development of the Project Site for residential and recreational uses with accompanying on-site and off-site infrastructure improvements. With the submittal of a project -specific application, an Addendum to the FEIR has been prepared, which includes minor technical changes and additions in order to determine the Project's consistency with the SDSP. The Project is in substantial conformance with the SDSP and the Addendum to the FOR documents that no new environmental issues has been identified and states the reasons to support the findings that the Project would not have any potentially significant impacts on the environment with the proposed mitigation measures included. A mitigation reporting and monitoring program (MRMP) has been prepared, which address site-specific conditions for the Project. The purpose of the 12 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-23 MRMP is to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures. The Project is conditioned to include these mitigation measures as part of Project approval. Tree Permit Findings (DBMC Section 22.38. 110) 1. Preservation of the tree is not feasible and would compromise the property owner's reasonable use and enjoyment of property and surrounding land and appropriate mitigation measures: The Project requires the removal of 83 existing protected trees consisting of 75 Southern California Black Walnuts, 6 Willows, and 2 Coast Live Oaks. The preservation of these trees is not feasible because it would compromise the design and construction of the Project. The applicant is proposing to replant native Oak and Sycamore trees instead of Southern Black Walnut trees because Southern Black Walnuts have a tendency to have a weak branching structure and are prone to splitting. In addition, these trees do not have a lot of inventory in the local nurseries. The replacement trees will be planted at a 3:1 ratio with 75 Coast Live Oak and 174 Sycamore trees, totaling 249 replacement trees, to be a minimum 24 inch box size. The replacement trees will provide sufficient replacement of the natural landscape. General Plan Conformance (Government Code Section 65402) 1. In compliance with Government Code Section 65402, the contemplated transfer of Site D to the Applicant and the dedication of parkland to the City are in conformity with the City's General Plan. in conjunction with the Project, it is contemplated that the Walnut Valley Unified School District and the City of Diamond Bar will transfer their respective interests in the Project Site to the Applicant, or its successor or assign. The proposed Project will be consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Specific Plan and the zoning designation of Site D Specific Plan, which allows for the development of up to 200 for -sale dwelling units and minimum two acre usable neighborhood public park. Transfer of Site D to a developer for development of a project consistent with the Site D Specific Plan was expressly contemplated when the Site D Specific Plan and associated General Plan Amendment were adopted. In conjunction with the Project, it is also contemplated that the City will accept dedication of a maximum of 4.3 acres of property (designated as Lots 62 and 63 on Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295) for public park purposes from Applicant or its successor or assign. This is be consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Specific Plan and the Site D Specific Plan, which expressly contemplates dedication to the City of a minimum two acre usable neighborhood public park. The acceptance of dedication of additional park land by the City in conjunction with the Project is also consistent with the following provisions of the General Plan: 13 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-23 ® Land Use Element—Goal 3, Objective 3.2, Strategy 3.2.1 states: Within the urban residential portions of the City, require the incorporation of open space and recreational areas into the design of new projects. ® Resource Management Element—Goal 1, Objective 1.3, Strategy 1.3.7 states: Develop recreation facilities emphasizing active and passive recreation areas and actively pursue land acquisition for parks. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth herein and as prescribed under DBMC Sections 21.20.080, 22.22.150, 22.48.040, and 22.38.110, this Planning Commission hereby finds and recommends that the City Council approve the Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Development Review, and Tree Permit, subject to the following conditions, and the attached Standard Conditions of Approval: A. GENERAL 1. The following Conditions of Approval, including the Standard Conditions of Approval attached hereto, shall be binding on and enforceable against, and, whenever used herein, the terms "applicant', "owner", and/or "applicant/owner" shall mean and refer to, each of the following: the project applicant, Lennar Homes of California, Inc., the owner(s) and tenants(s) of the property, and each of their respective successors and assigns. 2. The following Conditions of Approval, including the Standard Conditions of Approval attached hereto, shall be binding on and enforceable against, and, whenever used herein, the terms "applicant', 'owner', and/or "applicantiowner" shall mean and refer to, each of the following: the project applicant, Lennar Homes of California, Inc., the owner(s) and tenants(s) of the property, and each of their respective successors and assigns. 3. The subdivision shall comply with the Conditions of Approval attached hereto and referenced herein. 4. This approval shall not be effective for any purpose until the applicant/owner of the property involved has filed, within twenty-one (21) days of approval of this Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295, Development Review, and Tree Permit No. P112013-229, at the City of Diamond Bar Community Development Department, an affidavit stating that the applicant/owner is aware of and agrees to accept all the conditions of this approval. Further; this approval shall not be effective until the applicant pays the remaining City processing fees. 5. The applicant shall comply with Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.34.050. A permanent landscape maintenance program shall be implemented ensuring regular irrigation, fertilization, and weed removal. All landscaping shall be maintained in a healthy, neat and orderly condition, free of weeds and debris and with operating irrigation 14 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2D13-23 at all times. Provisions for ongoing maintenance of all areas of the Subject Property under the jurisdiction of a future homeowners association shall be set forth in the association CC&R's, which shall be subject to review and approval by the City prior to final map recordation. 6. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020, the Applicant is informed that the 90 -day period in which the Applicant may protest the fees, dedications, reservation or other exaction imposed on this approval through the conditions of approval has begun. B. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 1. Prior to the recordation of the final map, the development shall comply with the specific requirements of Chapter 21.30 (Subdivision Design and Improvement Requirements) and Chapter 21.34 (Improvement Plans and Agreements) of the Subdivision Ordinance, as applicable. Final map approval will not be granted unless the map is in substantial compliance with Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295 including all conditions, and the applicant has entered into a subdivision improvement agreement to the satisfaction of the City Attorney. 2. The approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295 expires within three years from the date of approval if the recordation of the map has not been exercised as defined per Diamond Bar Municipal Code (DBMC) Section 21.20.140. The applicant may request for a time extension if such request submitted to the City in writing is no less than 30 days prior to the approval's expiration date, subject to DBMC Section 21.20.150 for City Council approval. 3. All conditions of approval/performance standards and mitigation measures adopted by the City Council in conjunction with its certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Site D Specific Plan (SCH No. 2008021014), as revised as outlined in the Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report, which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and hereby incorporated herein by reference, shall be implemented and complied with. All required mitigation monitoring fees shall be deposited with the City 90 days prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All costs related to the ongoing monitoring shall be secured from the applicant and received by the City prior to the approval of the final map. 4. The Site D Specific Plan requires dedication to the City of a minimum of 2.0 net acres of usable public park space. The applicant has proposed to develop 4.7 acres of park space, approximately 2.2 acres of which will consist of a rain garden serving both as a required water detention facility for the subdivision and as a passive public recreational facility. In consideration for the City's acceptance of a dedication of 4.3 gross acres of public park land (of which a minimum of 2.5 net acres must be 15 Planning Commission Resolution No 2013-23 usable), the applicant has voluntarily agreed to pay the City a one-time fee in the amount of $136,500.00 to offset future operation and maintenance costs of the 4.3 gross acres of park land, including the rain garden / detention basin. Accordingly, the applicant (i) shall include on the final map an irrevocable offer to dedicate to the City a maximum of 4.3 gross acres and a minimum of 2.5 net usable acres of property within Lots 62 and 63 identified on the Vesting Tentative Map for public park purposes; and (ii) prior to City's acceptance of the dedication, shall pay the City a one-time payment for the operation and maintenance costs of the park in the amount of $136,500.00. 5. Prior to the issuance of the building permit for the 100th dwelling unit, the park shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Community Services Director. Following completion of the park, there shall be at least 120 days for plant establishment before consideration for park turnover to the City. If the 100th dwelling unit is within a multi -unit building, the building permit for the entire building shall be withheld until the park is completed. 6. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for the first residential unit, the applicant shall submit detailed design of the park showing all the elements and amenities for review and approval by the Community Development Director and Community Services Director. The park design shall also be reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Commission prior to final approval. The design elements shall include, at minimum, the following: Two sets of tot lots for 5-12 year olds, and shall include swing set (could be combined in one location if space is insufficient). ® Two sets of tot lots for 2-5 year olds, and shall include swing set (could be combined in one location if space is insufficient). • Pedestrian/maintenance vehicle bridge over Brea Canyon Flood Control Channel ® Rain Garden interpretive area, must be fenced with lockable gates. ® Two sets of picnic areas (shall include shade structure(s) if requested by City). ® Trail head for future Crooked Creek trail. ® Six stations of exercise equipment- ® Two drinking fountains. ® Two park identification signs. 16 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-23 ® Above -ground drain on the south end of the lot adjacent to Brea Canyon Road shall be covered. ® Parking lot for a minimum of six spaces, to be developed on the south end of the lot, adjacent to Brea Canyon Road. ® Corner entry feature. ® Twelve park benches. Centralized irrigation system. ® Decorative fence shall be installed between Brea Canyon Road and Neighborhood Park. In addition, the final park design plans shall include landscaping along the south of the pathway between Pasado Drive and the pedestrian bridge to serve as a visual barrier between the path and backyards of residences south of the development to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director and Community Services Director. The City reserves the right to eliminate any of the above park elements at its sole discretion. 7. Prior to dedication of the public park to the City, a detailed Maintenance and Operations Plan for the basin area referred to on the Project Plans as the Rain Garden shall be submitted to the Community Services Director for review and approval. 8. All concrete inlet/outlet structures in the detention basin/Rain Garden shall be adequately landscaped to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director and Community Services Director. 9. The Rain Garden shall include shade structures and benches, subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director and Community Services Director. 10. Prior to the City's acceptance of the Applicant's offer of dedication of the public park, the Applicant shall construct an "entry feature" in the vicinity of the Diamond Bar Boulevard and Brea Canyon Road. With regards to its design characteristics, the entry feature shall seek to visually draw from elements of the community and/or its history and serve as a "gateway° informing motorists and other viewers that they have entered the City of Diamond Bar. The minimum standard of performance used to measure compliance with this requirement shall be that the entry feature shall have a value, as determined by the Community Development Director, of not less than one-half of one percent (0.005) of the total building permit valuation for all residential structures within the Project boundaries. 17 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-23 11. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall prepare Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association for the approval of the Planning Division, Public Works/Engineering Department, and the City Attorney. The approved CC&Rs shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map, and a recorded copy shall be provided to the Community Development Department. Without limiting the City's approval rights, the CC&Rs shall, at a minimum, comply with the following requirements: i. The CC&Rs shall require the Homeowners' Association to submit to the Planning Division, a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. ii. The Conditions of Approval for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295, Development Review, and Tree Permit (Planning Case No. PL 2013-229) shall be incorporated into the CC&Rs, and provisions corresponding to any applicable Conditions of Approval shall be included in the CC&Rs. The CC&Rs shall require that all portions of the project be used, improved, repaired and maintained in strict compliance with all applicable provisions of the Conditions of Approval. iii. The CC&Rs shall include a provision acceptable to the City requiring the Homeowner's Association and the property owners to maintain the project in compliance with all applicable water quality laws, regulations, and standards of the State, City, or any other applicable governmental agency, to implement, and fund implementation of, the approved Operation and Maintenance ("O&M") Plan for the property, and to operate and maintain the Best Management Practices ("BMPs") described in the O&M Plan. iv. The CC&Rs shall include provisions regarding the preservation of Oak and Sycamore trees as outlined in the tree mitigation plan. v. The CC&Rs shall include provisions to the effect that the secondary master suite in the NextGen homes included in Plan 2 of the 60x70 lots, shall not contain a cooktop kitchen facility and separate metered utilities. vi. The CC&Rs shall include a provision that street trees on Diamond Bar Boulevard shall be irrigated from the development's automatic irrigation system. vii. The CC&Rs shall include provisions acceptable to the City regarding graffiti abatement. viii. The CC&Rs shall identify the City as an express third party beneficiary for purposes of enforcing the CC&Rs and these Conditions of Approval and shall give the City the right, but not the 18 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-23 obligation, to enforce the provisions of the CC&Rs and the Conditions of Approval by any legal or equitable means, or by any method available to the HOA, against the Declarant, HOA, property owners, their successors and assigns, or other persons in possession of the Project. In the enforcement of the CC&Rs, the City shall not be limited to the procedures or processes applicable to the HOA and may use any remedy provided under law or equity, including the City's Municipal Code. Any Alternative Dispute Resolution procedures set forth in the CC&Rs shall not apply to or bind the City. ix. The CC&Rs may not be terminated or substantially amended without prior written approval of the City. 12. Prior to the final map recordation or issuance of building permit, whichever comes first, the applicant shall provide the City with a "Buyer's Awareness Package" for the City's review and approval. The "Buyer's Awareness Package" shall include, but is not limited to, information pertaining to geological issues regarding the property, wildlife corridors, preservation of Oak and Sycamore trees, natural vegetation preservation issues, maintenance program for urban pollutant basins, all mitigation measures within the Mitigation Monitoring Program and explanatory information pertaining to restrictions on the use of properties such as the secondary master suites in the NextGen homes, and similar related matters. The applicant shall give each buyer a copy of the "Buyer's Awareness Package" and shall document their receipt of the same in the escrow instructions of each lot and document their receipt to the City. 13. The secondary master suite in the NextGen homes included in Plan 2 of the 60x70 lots, shall not contain a cooktop kitchen facility and separate metered utilities. The provisions to this effect shall be included in the Buyer's Awareness Package. 14. Prior to final map approval, street names shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public Works/Engineering Department. Street names shall not duplicate existing streets within the City of Diamond Bar's postal service zip code areas. C. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 1. This approval is for the site plan, elevations, exterior materials, and conceptual landscape plans for a new 182 -unit residential development to be constructed at the southeast corner of Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard, as described in the staff report and depicted on the approved plans on file with the Planning Division, subject to the conditions in this Resolution. 2. The construction documents submitted for plan check shall be in substantial compliance with the architectural plans approved by the City Council, as modified pursuant to the conditions below. If the plan check 19 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-23 submittal is not in substantial compliance with the approved Development Review submittal, the plans may require further staff review and re -notification of the surrounding property owners, which may delay the project and entail additional fees. 3. Prior to building permit issuance, landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for review and approval by the City's Consulting Landscape Architect for compliance with the Water Conservation Landscaping Ordinance. Appropriate and sufficient irrigation shall be provided to the Verdura walls and fast growing plant materials that grow all year round shall be used. 4. All existing landscaping and public improvements damaged during construction shall be repaired or replaced upon project completion. 5. All lighting fixtures shall be approved by the Planning Division as to type, orientation, and height. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate type, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 6. The applicant shall install street lighting along the internal private streets within the development. 7. The main entry gate, walls, and directory kiosk shall include decorative pilasters such as stacked stone or similar material, subject to the review and approval of the Planning Division. 8. The emergency access gate at the end of Pasado Drive shall have a decorative pattern, and final design shall be subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director and Community Services Director. 9. All landscape areas on the site as well as contiguous landscaped slopes along Diamond Bar Boulevard shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy and thriving conditions, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 10. Prior to the issuance of building permits, house numbering plans shall be submitted to and approved by the City Public Works Department. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. 11. Best Management Practices (BMP) devices shall be designed in consultation with the Greater Los Angeles County Vector Control District and shall be of a type which minimizes the potential for vector (public 20 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-23 nuisance) problems and maintained throughout the project life so as not to contribute to those problems. Unless accepted by the County and/or by the City, the responsibilities for and the funding of the maintenance of BMPs shall constitute obligations of the homeowners association. 12. In order to demonstrate compliance with applicable State and federal resource protection policies designed to protect or compensate for the loss of biological resources, prior to the issuance of grading permit, where applicable, the Applicant shall provide the Community Development Director with documentation of receipt of the following permits: (1) Section 401 (Federal Clean Water Act) water quality certification or waiver of waste discharge requirements from the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region, (2) nationwide Section 404 (Federal Clean Water Act) permit from the Unites States Army Corps of Engineers; and (3) Section 1602 (California Fish and Game Code) streambed alteration agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game. The Applicant shall comply with all associated permit requirements. 13. As determined feasible by the Community Development Director, initial vegetation removal activities shall be conducted outside the nesting season (February 15 -August 15) to avoid impacts upon nesting birds. If initial vegetation removal activities occur during the nesting season, prior to the commencement of any grading or grubbing activities, all suitable habitat shall first be thoroughly surveyed by a qualified biologist for the presence of nesting birds. If any active nests are detected, a buffer of at least 300 feet (500 feet for raptors) shall be delineated, flagged, and vegetation removal activities avoided therein until the nesting cycle is complete, as determined by the surveying biologist or a qualified biological monitor. 14. Prior to approval of the park plan, the applicant shall obtain all requisite permits and approvals from the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works — Flood Control District allowing for the building of the pedestrian/maintenance vehicle bridge over the Brea Canyon Flood Control Channel, and shall provide the City Engineer with documentation, acceptable to the City Engineer, demonstrating County approval and authorization, including a complete list of all permit requirements that may be associated therewith. 15. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall submit and, when deemed acceptable, the City Engineer shall approve a construction worker parking and equipment staging plan (PESP) designed to minimize disturbance to the surrounding residences to the greatest extent feasible. Unless otherwise authorized therein, contractors and other construction personnel performing construction activities in proximity to the project site shall be prohibited from parking and/or operating construction equipment, dumpsters, trailers, or other material within a public right-of-way or other public property. The PESP can be 21 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-23 combined with or become a part of the construction traffic safety plan and/or any other construction management plan as may be required by the City. 16. Unless previously approved by the City Engineer, no construction access shall be authorized from and no construction traffic shall be permitted along Castle Rock Road and Pasado Drive, except as may be required to construct and maintain any project -related street and other improvements within and adjacent to those rights-of-way. 17. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall submit and, when deemed acceptable, the City Engineer shall approve a construction traffic mitigation plan (CTMP). The CTMP shall identify the travel and haul routes to be used by construction vehicles; the points of ingress and egress for all construction vehicles; temporary street or lane closures, temporary signage, and temporary striping; location of materials and equipment staging areas; maintenance plans to remove spilled debris from roadway surfaces; and the hours during which large construction equipment may be brought on/off the project site. The Applicant shall keep all haul routes clean and free of debris including but not limited to gravel and dirt as a result of its operations. The Applicant shall clean adjacent streets, as directed by the City Engineer, of any material which may have been spilled, tracked, or blown onto adjacent streets or areas. Hauling or transport of oversize loads will be allowed between the hours of 9:00 AM and 3:00 PM only, Monday through Friday, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. No hauling or transport will be allowed during nighttime hours, weekends, or federal holidays. The use of local streets shall be limited only to those that provide direct access to the destination. Haul trucks entering or exiting public streets shall at all times yield to public traffic. If hauling operations cause any damage to existing pavement, street, curb, and/or gutter along the haul route, the Applicant will be fully responsible for repairs. The repairs shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 18. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall submit and, when deemed acceptable, the City shall approve a traffic control plan (TCP). The TCP shall be consistent with the Southern California Chapter of the American Public Works Association's "Work Area Traffic Control Handbook" (WATCH), the California Department of Transportation's "Manual of Traffic Controls for Construction and Maintenance Work Zones," or such alternative as may be deemed acceptable by the City. The TCP shall describe the Applicant's plans to safely and efficiently maintain vehicular and non -vehicular access along local roadways throughout the construction period. If any temporary access restrictions or lane closures are proposed by the Applicant, the TCP shall delineate detour routes, the hours, duration and frequency of such restrictions, and the emergency access and safety measures that will be implemented during those closures or restrictions. The TCP can be combined with or become a part of the construction traffic safety plan 22 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-23 and/or any other construction management plan as may be required by the City. 19. As determined by the City Engineer, should project -related construction activities result in the short-term closure of the existing Class II bicycle lanes or Class III bicycle paths along Diamond Bar Boulevard and/or Brea Canyon Road, during the term of that closure, signage shall be posted and other reasonable actions designed to enhance public safety taken within the area of those closures informing both motorists and bicyclists of that action. 20. Prior to the approval of any subsequent tentative tract map or the initiation of any improvements to Diamond Bar Boulevard that would result in the elimination of the existing Class If bicycle lane within that right-of-way, the City Engineer shall review street improvement plans for Diamond Bar Boulevard and determine the potential for retention, reconfiguration, and/or reclassification of the existing Class II bicycle lane along the property's frontage, within the existing right-of-way or as a result of the dedication of additional public right-of-way along Diamond Bar Boulevard or within the tract map boundaries and linking with the existing terminus points beyond the boundaries of the project site. Should the City Engineer determine that none of those options are feasible or desirable, a study shall be conducted and, when acceptable, approved by the City Engineer ascertaining whether the near -site elimination of the existing Class II bicycle lane will adversely impact rider safety or traffic flow and what actions can be taken by the City and/or the Applicant to maintain a sufficient level of rider and motorist safety. The findings of that study and the recommendations contained therein shall be submitted to the City Council for their consideration. 21. In order to reduce freeway -related noise impacts, all residential units shall include forced air ventilation designed and installed in accordance with Title 24 of California Building Code standards. 22. Prior to the commencement of grading activities, the Applicant shall prepare and submit for review by the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department (LACSD) a draft construction security plan outlining the activities that will be instituted by the Applicant to secure the construction site and the equipment and materials located thereupon from potential criminal incidents. The Applicant shall incorporate the recommendations of the LACSD, if any, into a final construction security plan and shall implement that plan during the construction period. 23. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the LACSD shall be provided the opportunity to review and comment upon building plans and the configuration of the residential development and neighborhood park in order to: (1) facilitate opportunities for improved emergency access and response; (2) ensure the consideration of design strategies that facilitate public safety and police surveillance; and (3) offer specific design 23 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-23 recommendations to enhance public safety and reduce potential demands upon police protection services. 24. Prior to the commencement of grading or grubbing activities, the Applicant shall prepare and submit and the Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACFD) shall review and, when deemed acceptable, approve a fire protection program and workplace standards for fire safety outlining those activities to be undertaken by the Applicant during the construction period. The Applicant shall abide by specific project -level permit conditions identified by the LACFD. 25. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACFD) will review and, when deemed acceptable, approve (1) final water improvement plans including, but not limited to, the location, sizing, design, and fire flow capacity of the proposed water mains and fire hydrants and proposed access improvements to ensure compliance with applicable Fire Code requirements, and (2) building plans. The project's water system shall be designed in response to final fire flow requirements identified by the LACFD. 26. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall submit to the Building Official for review and approval a temporary fencing and signage plan designed to discourage access to any active construction areas by children and other unauthorized parties. 27. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall present the City with a certificate of compliance or other documentation demonstrating that the Applicant has complied with the Walnut Valley Unified School District's School Board resolutions governing the payment of school impact fees or has entered into an Assembly Bill 2926 authorized school fee mitigation agreement or is not subject to the school impact fee exaction. D. TREE PERMIT 1. Prior to final approval of a grading permit or initiation of any activity that involves the removal/disturbance of oak and walnut woodland habitat, the applicant shall develop a detailed tree mitigation plan specifying the following: (1) describe the number, size, and location of compensatory trees to be planted; (2) outline success criteria and adaptive management procedures to ensure that the mitigation plan is successful; (3) a maintenance agreement stipulating the applicant's obligations for a minimum three-year period, including the annual reporting; (4) the amount and derivation of the security deposit required under the City's tree preservation ordinance; and submit the plan to the City for review and approval. Mitigation shall include a minimum replacement ratio of 3:1, totaling 249 replacement trees to be planted on-site. 24 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-23 The Planning Commission Secretary shall: (a) Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and (b) Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution to the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8T" DAY OF OCTOBER 2013, BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. BY: - To orng, Cha n I, Greg Gubman, Planning Commission Secretary, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Diamond Bar, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of October 2013, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners: Dhingra, Lin, shah, 4C/Farago, Chair/Tor-ng NOES: Commissioners: None ABSTAIN: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: None ATTEST:�- n, Secretary g=Ep� y 25 VTTM PL2013-229 �.; PROJECT #: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No 72295 Development Review, and Tree Permit (Planning Case No. PL 2013-229) SUBJECT: A Vesting Tentative Tract Map to subdivide an existing vacant 30 -acre lot into 63 lots for the development of 182 for -sale dwellinq units and minimum two acre neighborhood public park Development Review of the proposed architectural and landscape design elements associated with the proposed residential component of Site D and Tree Permit to remove 83 existing protected trees and replace them at a 3:1 ratio with 249 replacement trees to be planted on-site. PROPERTY OWNERS: Walnut Valley Unified School District and City of Diamond Bar APPLICANT: Lennar Homes of California Inc.,25 Enterprise Suite 300 Aliso Viejo CA 92656 LOCATION: Southeast Corner of Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard Diamond Bar CA 91789 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION AT (909) 839-7030, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. In accordance with Government Code Section 66474.9(b) (1), the applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, and its officers, agents and employees, from any claim, action, or proceeding to attack, set-aside, void or annul the approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Development Review, and Tree Permit No. PL2013-229 brought within the time period provided by Government Code Section 66499.37. In the event the city and/or its officers, agents and employees are made a party of any such action: 26 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-23 (a) Applicant shall provide a defense to the City defendants or at the City's option reimburse the City its costs of defense, including reasonable attorneys fees, incurred in defense of such claims. (b) Applicant shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against the City defendants. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action of proceeding, and shall cooperate fully in the defense thereof. 2. This approval shall not be effective for any purpose until the applicant and owner of the property involved have filed, within twenty-one (21) days of approval of this Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Development Review, and Tree Permit No. PL2013-229 at the City of Diamond Bar Community Development Department, their affidavit stating that they are aware of and agrees to accept all the conditions of this approval. Further, this approval shall not be effective until the applicants pays remaining City processing fees, school fees and fees for the review of submitted reports. 3. All designers, architects, engineers, and contractors associated with this project shall obtain a Diamond Bar Business License, and zoning approval for those businesses located in Diamond Bar. 4. Signed copies of City Council Resolution No. 2013 -XX, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all partied involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of City permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Revised plans incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval during plan check. 7. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval shall be completed. 8. The project site shall be maintained and operated in full compliance with the conditions of approval and all laws, or.other applicable Federal, State, or City regulations. 9. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and any applicable Specific Plan in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 10. Property owner/applicant shall remove the public hearing notice board within three (3) days of this project's approval. 27 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-23 11. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of Planning and Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works/Engineering Department, and the Los Angeles County Fire Department. 12. These conditions of approval shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all future owners, operators, or successors thereto of the property. Non- compliance with any condition of approval or mitigation measure imposed as a condition of this approval, shall constitute a violation of the City's Development Code. Violations may be enforced in accordance with the provisions of the Development Code. 13. To ensure compliance with the provisions of the City Council design approval, a final inspection is required from the Planning Division when work for any phase of the project has been completed. The applicant shall inform the Planning Division and schedule an appointment for such an inspection. 14. Failure to comply with any of the conditions set forth herein or as subsequently amended in writing by the City, may result in failure to obtain a building final and/or a certificate of occupancy until full compliance is reached. The City's requirement for full compliance may require minor corrections and/or complete demolition of a non-compliance improvement, regardless of costs incurred where the project does not comply with design requirements and approvals that the applicant agreed to when permits were pulled to construct the project. B. FEES/DEPOSITS 1. Applicant shall pay development fees (including but not limited to Planning, Building and Safety Divisions, Public Works Department and Mitigation Monitoring) at the established rates, prior to issuance of building permits, as required by the City. School fees as required shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permit. In addition, the applicant shall pay all remaining prorated City project review and processing fees prior to final map approval. 2. Prior to final map approval, all deposit accounts for the processing of this project shall have no deficits. C. TIME LIMITS 1. The approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Development Review, and Tree Permit shall expire within three (3) years from the date of approval if the use has not been exercised as defined pursuant to Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 21.20.140 and 22.66.050(b)(1). In accordance with Diamond Bar Municipal Code Section 22.60.050(c), the applicant may request, in writing, for a one-year time extension for City Council consideration. Such a request must be submitted to the Planning Division prior to the expiration date and be accompanied by the review fee in accordance with the Fee Schedule in effect at the time of submittal. 28 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-23 D. SITE DEVELOPMENT 1. The project site shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the approved plans submitted to, approved, and amended herein by the City Council, on file with the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 2. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, air conditioning condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berms, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Division. 3. All roof -mounted equipment shall be screened from public view. 4. All structures, including walls, trash enclosures, canopies, etc., shall be maintained in a structurally sound, safe manner with a clean, orderly appearance. All graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours by the property owners/occupant. 5. No occupancy permit can be granted, until all improvements required by this approval have been properly constructed, inspected, and approved. 6. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the location, size, and screening of all building utility service connections, including water, gas, and electric service, fire service, and irrigation connections shall be approved by the Community Development Director. All changes to building utility connections shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to construction. Building utility connections shall be located, sized and screened in such a manner that they have the least possible impact on the design of the building and site. The architect of record shall be directly involved in the design and placement of all site and building service connections and shall sign all plans submitted to the City which locate, size and/or screen utility connections. 7. Additional plant materials may be required by the Community Development Director and shall be planted prior to final occupancy in order to screen utility connections, valves, backflow devices, and all above ground appurtenances, etc., to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. This determination shall be made in the field after all screen utility connections, valves, backflow devices, and all above ground appurtenances, etc. have been installed and inspected. E. SOLID WASTE 1. The site shall be maintained in a condition, which is free of debris both during and after the construction, addition, or implementation of the entitlement approved herein. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether during or subsequent to construction shall be done only by the property owner, applicant or by a duly permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste from 29 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-23 residential, commercial, construction, and industrial areas within the City. It shall be the applicant's obligation to insure that the waste contractor used has obtained permits from the City of Diamond Bar to provide such services. 2. Mandatory solid waste disposal services shall be provided by the City franchised waste hauler to all parcels/lots or uses affected by approval of this project. 3. All trash pick-ups shall be for individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, (909) 839-7040, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. GENERAL 1. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for review and approval with the park precise grading plans. 2. A title report/guarantee showing all fee owners, interest holders, and nature of interest shall be submitted with final map plan check. An updated title report/guarantee and subdivision guarantee shall be submitted ten (10) business days prior to final map approval. 3. A permit from the Los Angeles County Public Works Department and/or Los Angeles County Flood Control District (LACFCD) shall be required for work within its right-of-way/easements or connection to its facilities. 4. Prior to final map approval, written certification that all utility services -and any other public utility service related to the site shall be available to serve the proposed project and shall be submitted to the City. Such letters shall be issued by the respective utility company within ninety (90) calendar days prior to final map approval. 5. Prior to final map approval, applicant shall submit to the City Engineer the detail cost estimates for bonding purposes of all onsite/offsite improvements including grading, street improvement, sewer, storm drain, landscape and irrigation, and monumentation. 6. Prior to final map approval, if any public or private improvements required as part of this map have not been completed by applicant and accepted by the City, applicant shall enter into a subdivision agreement with the City and shall post the appropriate security. 7. Prior to final map approval, all site grading, landscaping and irrigation, street, sewer and storm drain improvement plans shall be approved by the City Engineer, surety shall be posted, and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all public and private improvements. 30 Planning Commission ResoM,cn No. 2013-23 8. Prior to issuance of grading permits, storm drain plans shall be approved with surety posted guaranteeing completion of all drainage facilities to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 9. Any details or notes which may be inconsistent with requirement or ordinances, general conditions of approval, or City policies shall be specifically approved in other conditions or ordinance requirements as modified to those shown on the vesting tentative tract map upon approval by the City Council. 10. All identified geologic hazards within the project boundaries which cannot be mitigated as approved by the City Engineer shall be indicated on the final map as "Restricted Use Area" subject to geologic hazard. The applicant shall dedicate to the City the right to prohibit the erection of buildings or other structures within such restricted use areas shown on the final map. 11. Prior to finalization of any development phase, sufficient street, sewer, and drainage improvements shall be completed beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access, proper outfall for sewers and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot lines shown on the final map. 12. Prior to any work performed in the existing street right-of-way along Diamond Bar Blvd., Brea Canyon Road, Pasado Drive or Castle Rock Road permit fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Department in addition to any other permits required. 13. Applicant shall label and delineate on the final map any private streets, driveways or fire lanes to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 14. Upon recordation of the final map, applicant shall submit to the Public Works/Engineering Department, at no cost to the City, a full size reproducible copy of the recorded map. Final acceptance of the public improvements shall not be given until the copy of the recorded map is received by the Public Works/Engineering Department. 15. Prior to occupancy, the applicant shall provide to the City as built mylars, stamped by appropriate individuals certifying the completion of all improvements at no cost to the City. 16. Applicant shall contribute funds to a separate engineering trust deposit against which charges can be made by the City or its representatives for services rendered. Charges shall be on an hourly basis and shall include any City administrative costs. 17. Applicant shall provide digitized information in a format defined by the City for all related plans, at no cost to the City. 31 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-23 18. All activities/improvements proposed for this VTTM 72295 shall be wholly contained within the boundaries of the map. Should any off-site activities/improvements be required, approval shall be obtained from the affected property owner and the City as required by the City Engineer. B. GRADING/GEOTECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS 1. No grading or any staging or construction shall be performed prior to final map approval by the City Council and map recordation or grading permit issuance, whichever comes first. All pertinent improvement plans shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval by the City Council. 2. Prior to the issuance of any City permits, the applicant shall provide written permission to the satisfaction of the City from any property owners which will be affected by offsite grading. 3. All sewer and storm drain plans shall be approved prior to grading permit issuance. 4. Prior to beginning any grading activities, appropriate rodent control shall be installed around the perimeter of the project site to. prevent the migration of rodents to existing residential and commercial sites. A plan detailing the proposed rodent barriers to be used by the developer/contractor shall be submitted to the Public Works/Engineering Department and Planning Division for review. 5. Retaining wall location shall be shown on the grading plan and submitted with a soils report to the Public Works/Engineering Department for review concurrently with the grading plan check. 6. Grading and construction activities and the transportation of equipment and materials and operation of heavy grading equipment shall be limited to between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. Dust generated by grading and construction activities shall be reduced by watering the soil prior to and during the activities and in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 402 and Rule 403. Reclaimed water shall be utilized whenever possible. Additionally, all construction equipment shall be properly muffled to reduce noise levels. 7. All equipment staging areas shall be located on the project site. Staging area, including material stockpile and equipment storage area, shall be enclosed within a 6 foot -high chain link fence. All access points to the staging area shall be locked whenever the construction site is not supervised. 8. Precise grading plans for each lot shall be submitted to the Public Works/Engineering Department for approval prior to issuance of building permits. 32 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-23 9. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the California Building Code, City Grading Ordinance, Hillside Management Ordinance and acceptable grading practices. 10. The maximum grade of driveways serving building pad areas shall be 15 percent. In hillside areas driveway grades exceeding 10 percent shall have parking landings with a minimum 16 feet deep and shall not exceed five (5) percent grade or as required by the City Engineer. Driveways with a slope of 15 percent shall incorporate grooves for traction into the driveway as required by the City Engineer. 11. At the time of submittal of the 40 -scale grading plan for plan check, a detailed soils and geology report shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval. Said report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer and/or geologist licensed by the State of California. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a detailed geotechnical investigation will be required to evaluate the site conditions with respect to the proposed development and provide geotechnical recommendations for design and construction of the proposed improvements. 12. The detailed geotechnical investigation shall address the review comments by the City's Geotechnical Engineering Consultant, Leighton and Associates dated August 23, 2013, and September 17, 2013, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 13. Rough and Precise grading plans shall be designed in compliance with the recommendations of the final detailed soils and engineering geology reports. All remedial earthwork specified in the final report shall be incorporated into the grading plans. Grading plans shall be signed and stamped by a California Registered Civil Engineer, registered Geotechnical Engineer and registered Engineering Geologist and approved by the City Engineer. 14. A Low Impact Development (LID) Plan conforming to the 2012 MS4 Permit issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region Order No. R4-2012-0175, on November 08, 2012 shall be submitted for review and approval as deemed necessary and may be required to be incorporated into the grading, storm drain and street improvement plans to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. All review comments by the City's Water Quality Consultant, John L. Hunter and Associates, dated August 13, 2013, shall be addressed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 15. A separate Low Impact Development (LID) Plan conforming to the 2012 MS4 Permit issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region Order No. R4-2012-0175, on November 08, 2012 shall be submitted for review and approval and may be required to be incorporated into the grading, storm drain and street improvement plans to the satisfaction of the City Engineer for any and all park improvements. 16. An erosion control plan shall be approved by the City Engineer. Erosion control plans shall be made in accordance to the City's NPDES requirements. A 33 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-23 separate Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is required. Grading permits will not be issued until approval of the SWPPP and the associated WDID Number have been issued by the State Regional Water Quality Control Board. 17. All slopes shall be seeded per landscape plan and/or fuel modification plan with native grasses or planted with ground cover, shrubs, and trees for erosion control upon completion of grading or some other alternative method of erosion control shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and a permanent irrigation system shall be installed per the City's Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. 18. Submit a stockpile plan showing the proposed location for stockpile for grading export materials, and the route of transport. 19. Prepare a horizontal control plan and submit concurrently with the grading plan for review and approval. 20. Prior to commencing any grading activities, a pre -construction meeting must be held at the project site with the grading contractor, geotechnical engineer applicant, and city grading inspector and engineers and City building inspector at least 48 hours prior to commencing grading operations. 21. Rough grade certifications by project soils and civil engineers and a geotechnical as -graded report shall be submitted prior to issuance of building permits for any residential structure. Retaining wall permits may be issued concurrently with the grading permits. 22. Retaining wall permits shall be obtained from the Building and Safety Division. 23. Final grade certifications by project soils engineer and civil engineers shall be submitted to the Public Works/Engineering Department prior to the issuance of any project final inspections/certificate of occupancy. 24. Precise grading plans for Lots 62 and 63, to be dedicated to the City as a public park, shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval. A separate grading permit will be required for precise grading activities on Lots 62 and 63. C. DRAINAGE 1. All terrace drains and drainage channels shall be constructed in muted earth tones so as not to impart adverse visual impacts. Terrace drains shall follow landform slope configuration and shall not be placed in an exposed positions. All down drains shall be hidden in swales diagonally or curvilinear across a slope face. 2. All storm drain improvements shall be installed and accepted by the City prior to issuance of building permits, for construction upon any parcel that may be 34 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-23 subject to drainage flows entering, leaving, or within a parcel relative to which a building permit is requested. 3. Prior to placement of any dredged or fill material into any U.S.G.S. blue line stream bed, a 404 permit shall be obtained from the Army Corps of Engineers and an agreement with the California Department of Fish and Game shall be obtained and submitted to the City Engineer. 4. All identified flood hazard locations within the project boundaries which cannot be mitigated as approved by the City Engineer shall be shown on the final map and delineated as "Flood Hazard Area." 5. Storm drainage facilities shall be constructed within the street right-of-way or in easements satisfactory to the City Engineer and dedicated to the Home Owners Association (HOA). 6. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a complete hydrology and hydraulic study shall be prepared by a Civil Engineer registered in the. State of California to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 7. All storm drain plans shall comply with the approved Low Impact Development (LID) Plan to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 8. Connection to any Los Angeles County Facility will require Los Angeles County approval. All approvals and any associated permits from the County shall be submitted to the City prior to approval of any storm drain improvements plans. 9. Grading and coverage of the drainage channel on Lot 63 will require approval from the Los Angeles County Flood Control District. Permits for work within Lot 63 will not be issued without written approval from LACFCD. 10. A comprehensive Operations & Maintenance (O&M) plan/program shall be submitted concurrently with the storm drain plans to the Public Works/Engineering Department for review and approval to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, The O&M Plan/Program shall be included in the CC&R's as a responsibility of the HOA. 11. Easements for ingress/egress and maintenance purposes shall be reserved on the final map for the maintenance responsibilities by the HOA of the inlet structure to the detention basin/public park area. D. STREET IMPROVEMENT 1. The applicant shall replace and record any centerline ties and monuments that are removed as part of this construction with the Los Angeles County Public Works Survey Division. 2. Street improvement plans in a 24" x 36" sheet format, prepared by a registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. 35 Planning Commission Resolution No, 2013-23 Streets shall not exceed a maximum slope of 12 percent. All street improvement plans shall conform to the approved Low Impact Development (LID) Plan to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 3. New street centerline monuments shall be set at the intersections of two or more streets, intersections of two or more streets, intersections of streets with tract boundaries and to mark the beginning and ending of curves or the points of intersection of tangents thereof. Survey notes showing the ties between all monuments set and four (4) durable reference points for each shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval, prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. 4. The design and construction of private street improvements shall be set to City and County standards and designed to a design speed of 20 mph and all streets shall be posted at 15 mph speed limit with the concurrence of the applicant's traffic engineer. 5. Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy, applicant shall construct base pavement for all streets in accordance with soils report prepared by a California registered soils engineer and approved by the City Engineer or as otherwise directed by the City Engineer. 6. All improvements identified for the project along Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Blvd. shall be designed and constructed per the recommendations of the approved Traffic Impact Analysis dated July 18, 2013, Development Agreement dated April 20, 2012, and any associated amendments as well as City Standards. 7. All dedications of roadways shall be made and accepted by the City Council upon completion of the improvements and prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy. 8. Separate street improvement plans for Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Blvd. shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer. Improvement plans shall include details for street improvements, signal improvements/modifications, striping, landscape and any associated utility adjustments required as a result of the new right-of-way width. 9. Median reconstruction and landscape design along Diamond Bar Blvd. shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department and Community Services Department and shall be designed in accordance with all applicable City Standards. 10. Separate encroachment permits shall be obtained from the Public Works Department for any improvements made along Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Blvd. 36 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-23 11. All streetscape improvements including parkway landscape along Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Blvd. shall be in accordance with the City's Streetscape Design Guidelines. 12. Upon completion of the construction of public right-of-way improvements, review of the roadway conditions will be warranted by the Public Works Department. Any damages to the roadway will be required to be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Engineer at the applicant's cost. At a minimum a type II slurry seal (in accordance with City specifications) and complete re -stripe of the roadway from the center of the roadway to the edge of gutter along the project frontage for Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Blvd. will be required. 13. All legal lots/parcels legally subdivided by Vesting Tentative Tract Map 72295 shall be annexed into citywide Landscape Assessment District #38. 14. Improvements along Pasado Drive shall include the dedication of the cul-de-sac to the City of Diamond Bar, reconstruction of an ADA compliant sidewalk, parkway landscape, and reconstruction of the cul-de-sac as deemed necessary to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, 15. Improvements along Castle Rock Drive shall include the reconstruction of an ADA compliant sidewalk, parkway landscape, and reconstruction of the cul-de- sac as deemed necessary to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. E. UTILITIES Easements, satisfactory to the City Engineer and the utility companies, for public utility and public services purposes shall be offered and shown on the detailed site plan and final map as deemed appropriate. 2. Prior to final map approval, a water system with appurtenant facilities to serve all lots/parcels in the land division, designed to the Walnut Valley Water District (WVWD) specifications, shall be provided. The system shall include fire hydrants of the type and location as determined by the Los Angeles County Fire Department. The water mains shall be sized to accommodate the total domestic and fire flows to the satisfaction of the WVWD and Fire Department, 3. Prior to final map approval, the applicant shall construct or enter into an improvement agreement with the City guaranteeing construction of the necessary improvements to the existing water system according to Walnut Valley Water District (WVWD) specifications to accommodate the total domestic and fire flows as may be required by the WVWD and Fire Department. 4. Applicant shall relocate and underground any existing on-site utilities to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the respective utility owner. 5. The power poles and guy poles along the project frontage on Diamond Bar Blvd. and Brea Canyon Road shall be eliminated and the facilities located underground. 37 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-23 6. Underground utilities shall not be constructed within the drip line of any mature tree except as approved by a registered arborist. 7. Applicant shall construct street lights on the length of the project frontage along Diamond Bar Blvd. and Brea Canyon Road, as required, per Los Angeles County Standards and as approved by the City Engineer. The street lights shall be annexed into the Los Angeles County Lighting Maintenance District 10006 and Los Angeles County Lighting District LLA -1 (Diamond Bar Zone). Approval from the County on the street light design shall be obtained prior to approval of any roadway improvement plans for Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Blvd. 8. Applicant shall design and construct street lights within the tract boundaries per City Standards and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. In -tract street lights will be the responsibility of the HOA to own, operate and maintain. 9. Electrical transformers, water meters and any other utility facilities to be constructed within the street right-of-way (public or private) landscape area will require approval of the location/placement within said right-of-way by the Community Development Director. F. SEWERS 1. Applicant shall construct a sanitary sewer system in accordance with the approved Sewer System Analysis dated September 24, 2013, and all associated amendments to the satisfaction of the City Engineer which verifies that capacity is available in the existing sewage system to be used as the outfall for the sewers in this subdivision. If the existing system including the Castle Rock and Fountain Springs Pump Stations are found to be of insufficient capacity, the deficiencies shall be resolved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 2. Each dwelling unit shall be served by a separate sewer lateral which shall not cross any other lot lines. The sanitary sewer mainline system serving the tract shall be connected to the City sewer system. Said system shall be of the size, grade and depth approved by the City Engineer, County Sanitation District and Los Angeles County Public Works and surety shall be provided and an agreement executed prior to approval of the final map if improvements are not constructed. 3. Applicant shall obtain connection permit(s) from the City. The project shall be annexed into the County Consolidated Sewer Maintenance District and appropriate easements for all sewer main lines shall be shown on the final map and offered for dedication on the final map. 4. Applicant, at applicant's sole cost and expense, shall construct the sewer system in accordance with the City, Los Angeles County Public Works Department and County Sanitation District Standards prior to occupancy. 38 Planning Commission Resolution No 2013-23 5. A fair share payment in the amount of $78,081.60 (based on a 15% impact to the Emergency Storage Capacity at the Castle Rock Pump Station as indicated in the Sewer and Water System Analysis dated September 24, 2013) and $29,438.71 (based on a 3.6% impact to the Emergency Storage Capacity at the Fountain Springs Pump Station as indicated in the Sewer and Water System Analysis dated September 24, 2013) shall be accepted by the City prior to the issuance of the final sewer inspection sign off and sewer improvement bond release. G. TRAFFIC MITIGATIONS 1. All traffic mitigations shall be implemented and constructed in accordance with the Traffic Impact Analysis dated July 18, 2013, and conditions of project approval for the VTTM 72295 prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. 2. A fair share payment in the amount of $154,730.00 as identified in the Traffic Impact Analysis, dated July 18, 2013, shall be accepted by the City prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy. 3. Any changes to the proposed parking lot layout on Lot 63 from the layout shown in the Traffic Impact Analysis dated July 18, 2013, will require an amendment to the TIA and additional line of sight analysis. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 839-7020, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Plans shall conform to current State and Local Building Code requirements and all other applicable construction codes, ordinances and regulations in effect at the time of plan check submittal. Work shall be in conformance to the adopted code at the time of submittal. 2. Provisions for Cal Green shall be implemented onto plans and certification provided by a third party as required by the Building Division. Specific water, waste, low VOC, and related conservation measures shall be shown on plans. 3. Fire sprinklers are required for new single family dwellings (CRC R313.2). 4. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been met. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 5. Every permit issued by the Building and Safety Division shall expire if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit or work has discontinued and not been signed -off on the job card by the building inspector. 39 Planning Commission Resolution No. 213 23 6. Construction activities causing the operation of any tools or equipment used in construction, drilling, repair, alteration, or demolition work shall be conducted Monday — Saturday between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. 7. The project shall be protected by a construction fence to the satisfaction of the Building Official. All fencing shall be view obstructing with opaque surfaces. 8. All structures and property shall be maintained in a safe and clean manner during construction. The property shall be free of debris, trash, and weeds. 9. All equipment staging areas shall be maintained in an orderly manner and screened behind a minimum 6' high fence. 10. Solid waste management of construction material shall incorporate recycling material collection per Diamond Bar Municipal Code 8.16 of Title 8. 11. The minimum design load for wind in this area is 85 M.P.H. exposures "C" and the site is within seismic zone D or E. The applicant shall submit drawings and calculations prepared by a California State licensed Architect/Engineerwith wet stamp and signature. 12. This project shall comply with the energy conservation requirements of the State of California Energy Commission. All lighting shall be high efficacy or equivalent per the current California Energy Code 119 and 150(k). 13. Indoor air quality shall be provided consistent with ASHRAE 62.2 as required per California Energy Code 150(0). 14. This project shall comply with all Accessibility Code requirements of California Building Code Chapter 11A for all units that are considered "covered multifamily dwelling units" per CBC 1104A. 15. Where sales trailers or temporary offices used by the public are provided, accessible design is required and a separate permit is required. 16. Submit Public Works Department approved grading plans showing clearly all finish elevations, drainage, and retaining walls locations. 17. "Separate permits are required for fountains, retaining walls, fences over 6' in height, common use facilities, and entry monuments" and shall be noted on plans. 18. A height and setback survey will be required at completion of framing and foundations respectively. Location of new homes shall be staked in the field by the surveyor. 19. Prior to Building permit issuance, all school district fees must be paid. Please obtain a form from the Building and Safety Division to take directly to the school district. 40 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2913-23 20. Indicate all easements on the site plan. 21. LA County Fire approval is required. Contact Fire Department for requirements pertaining to access, fire flow, etc. 22. All retaining walls shall be submitted to the Building and Safety and Public Work Departments for review and approval. 23. Submit grading plans showing clearly all finish elevations, drainage, and retaining wall locations. No building permits shall be issued prior to submitting a pad certification. 24. The project shall be protected by a construction fence and shall comply with the NPDES & BMP requirements (sand bags, etc.) 25. Check drainage patterns with Engineering Department. Surface water shall drain away from building at a 2% minimum slope. 26. Specify location of tempered glass as required by code. 27. Specify 1/4"/ft slope for all flat surfaces/ decks with approved water proofing material. Also, provide guardrail connection detail (height, spacing, etc.) 28. Special inspections and structural observation will be required in conformance to CBC 1704 to 1709. 29. A soils report is required and all recommendations of the soils report shall be adhered to. 30. Slope setbacks consistent with California Building Code Figure 1805.3.1 and California Residential Code R403.1.7. Foundations shall provide a minimum distance to daylight. 31. The applicant shall contact Dig Alert and have underground utility locations marked by the utility companies prior to any excavation. Contact Dig Alert by dialing 811 or their website at www.digalert.org. 32. The location of property lines and building pad may require a survey. 33. All workers on the job shall be covered by workman's compensation insurance under a licensed general contractor. 34. Any changes to approved plans during the course of construction shall be approved by the City prior to proceeding with any work. 35. MSE walls shall be designed based on a specific geotechnical report identifying the design criteria for this specific project. 41 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-23 36. Accessible paths of travel are required from accessible spaces to the entrances of accessible units. 37. Limits of the MSE wall mesh/grid system shall be shown on the grading plan showing areas that shall not be interrupted where the mesh/grid system is in- place. 38. Plan 2 for the 60x70 lots shall be designed as a two-family dwelling per CRC 302.3 with a fire and sound -rated separation between each combination considered a dwelling unit as defined per CBC 202- 39. At least 10% of condo units in carriage type units shall be accessible as required per CBC 1102A.3 for visitability requirements. 40. Phasing of construction shall be approved by the Community Development Director. Phasing shall be designed to prevent "spot building" (scattered construction of structures) from occurring. Otherwise, a construction staging plan shall be provided and approved by Community Development Director to show how the "spot building" will protect the safety of new owners adjacent to construction. 41. The Building Code edition that permits will be based on will follow the date of building plan check submittal and shall be valid for 180 -days. Permits filed after 180 -days from the plan check submittal date shall meet the Building Code edition in effect at the time of permit issuance. If plans are submitted for Building plan check after January 1, 2014, the 2013 California Building Code will apply including the following: 42. Solar ready roofs shall be provided and laid out in conformance with the California Energy Code Section 110.10. This item may be based on the tentative subdivision map approval. 43. Water heater pipe insulation is required per California Energy Code 150.00)2 with insulation consistent with California Energy Code Table 120.3-A. 44. Field verification of AC units are required to meet energy efficiency requirements outlined in California Energy Code 150.1(b)4. 45. A whole house fan is required per California Energy Code 150.1(c)12. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT, (323) 890-4243, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. SUBDIVISION 1. Access shall comply with Section 503 of the Fire Code, which requires all weather access. All weather access may require paving. 42 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-23 2. Fire Department Access shall be extended to within 150 feet distance of any exterior portion of all structures. 3. Where driveways extend further than 150 feet and are of single access design, turnarounds suitable for fire protection equipment use shall be provided and shown on the final map. Turnarounds shall be designed, constructed and maintained to insure their integrity for Fire Department use. Where topography dictates, turnarounds shall be provided for driveways that extend over 150 feet in length. 4. Private driveways shall be indicated on the final map as "Private Driveway and Firelane" with the widths clearly depicted and shall be maintained in accordance with the Fire Code. All required fire hydrants shall be installed, tested and accepted prior to construction. 5. Vehicular access must be provided and maintained serviceable throughout construction to all required fire hydrants. All require fire hydrants shall be installed, tested and accepted prior to construction. 6. Provide Fire Department or City approved street signs and building access number prior to occupancy. 7. The final map shall be submitted to our office for review and approval prior recordation. R. WATER SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS 1. Provide water mains, fire hydrants and fire flows as required by the County of Los Angeles Fire Department, for all land shown on map which shall be recorded. 2. The required fire flow for public fire hydrants at this location is 3500 gallons per minute at 20 psi for a duration of 3 hours, over and above maximum daily domestic demand. 3 hydrant(s) flowing simultaneously may be used to achieve the required fire flow. 3. Fire hydrant requirements are as follows: Install 11 public fire hydrants and upgrade/verify 1 existing public fire hydrant. 4. All hydrants shall measure 6"x 4"x 2'/z" brass or bronze, conforming to current AWWA standard C503 or approved equal. All on-site hydrants shall be installed a minimum of 25 feet from a structure or protected by a two (2) hour rated firewall. ® Location: As per map on file with the office. 5. All required fire hydrants shall be installed, tested and accepted or bonded for prior to Final Map approval. Vehicular access shall be provided and maintained serviceable throughout construction. 43 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-23 6. Additional water system requirements will be required when this land is further subdivided and/or during the building permit process. 7. All proposed structures shall be equipped with automatic fire sprinkler systems that are designed and maintain in accordance with NFPA 13. 8. Additional water requirements will be determined by the Fire Prevention Engineering Unit at further development of the site. END 44 Planning Commission Resolution No 2013-23 "Site D" Specific Plan City of Diamond Bar, California Table A-2 VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 72295 Pr_%/iqP:n MITIrATInN PPIPOPTIlkir ANin MONITORING PROGRAM Exhibit A Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 September 2012 Addendum No. 1: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295 Page 44 .... ....... . ... .. Miti gat! Pot V I i�t",�,,Milefstonw, of! _0 _4 Hydrology and Water Quality Prior to the issuance of grading permits, all drainage facilities and improvements shall be subject to final design city Issuance of 1 and engineering review and approval by the City Engineer and, for those storm drain facilities under County Engineer Grading jurisdiction, by the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW) (Mitigation Measure 4-1). Permits Biological Resources In order to reduce impacts to United States Army Corps of Engineers and Regional Water Quality Control Board (ACOE/RWQCB) and California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) jurisdictional waters, prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director, receipt of any discretionary permits and approval as may be required from the ACOE, RWQC6, and Community Issuance of 2 CDFG and commit to the provision of compensatory jurisdictional resources meeting or exceeding the following Development Grading minimal standards: (1) the on-site and/or off-site replacement of ACOE/RWQCB jurisdictional waters and Director Permits wetlands at a 2:1 ratio; (2) the on-site and/or off-site replacement of CDFG jurisdictional streambed and associated riparian habitat at a 2:1 ratio; and (3) the incorporation of design features into the project's design and development enhancing the site's biological resources (Mitigation Measure 5-1). Traffic and Circulation Prior to the recordation of the final tract map or issuance of occupancy permits for any residential development, as determined by the City Engineer, the Applicant shall complete, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, those street and intersection improvements identified in the traffic impact analysis or any supplement thereto, provide a Final Tract Map bond or other acceptable instruct committing to those improvements, and/or provide a "fair -share" contribution Recordation toward the cost of the improvements to the following intersections: (1) Brea Canyon Road at Pathfinder Road; (2) city or 3 Diamond Bar Boulevard at Pathfinder Road; (3) 13ma CanyGR Read at COIEI Spicing Lane (4) QJ Diamond Bar Engineer Issuance of Boulevard at Cold Spring Lane, (6� J4) Pathfinder Road at Brea Canyon Cutoff; (A94(5) SR -57 SB Ramps at Brea Occupancy Canyon Cutoff; (-T) &I SR -57 NB Ramps at Brea Canyon Cutoff; R al Brea Canyon Road at Diamond Bar Permits Boulevard; (g) U Crooked Creek or Cherrydale Drive at Diamond Bar Boulevard; (10) (9) Brea Canyon Road at Silver Bullet Drive; " (10) Diamond Bar Boulevard at Grand Avenue, and 0-2)(11) Colima Road at Brea Canyon Cutoff (Mitigation Measure 6-1). The final site plan shall include and accommodate those traffic measures, improvements, and such other city Site Plan 4 pertinent factors and/or facilities as may be identified by the City Engineer to ensure the safe and efficient Engineer Approval movement of project -related traffic (Mitigation Measure 6-2), Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 September 2012 Addendum No. 1: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295 Page 44 "Site D" Specific Plan City of Diamond Bar, California Table A-2 (Continued) VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 72295 RFVISFn MITIGATION REPORTING AND MONITORING PROGRAM Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 September 2012 Addendum No. 1: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295 Page 45 t€ t ( t:-tl tlo iNitga6on Nlea�uRe :.. } - r Yen'iica,i€on g , ,I'IA7ile�tone; Air Quality Site watering shall be conducted a minimum of three times daily during site preparation activities within disturbed Building Construction 5 areas lacking ground coverage (Mitigation Measure 7-1). Inspector Term Noise In accordance with the Development Code, construction shall be restricted to between the hours of 7:00 AM and 9�QQ 7:00 PM on weekdays and Saturdays. No construction shall occur at any time on Sundays or on federal 6 holidays. These days and hours shall also apply any servicing of equipment and to the delivery of construction materials to or from the site (Mitigation Measure 8-1). All construction equipment shall be properly maintained and tuned to minimize noise emissions (Mitigation 7 Measure 8-2). Building Construction Inspector Term All equipment shall be fitted with properly operating mufflers, air intake silencers, and engine shrouds no less 8 effective than originally equipped (Mitigation Measure 8-3). The construction contractor shall place temporary noise barriers along the site perimeter when doing any work 9 f within 100 feet of any existing residential units. Where feasible, such barriers shall attempt to block the line of sight between the residents and construction equipment (Mitigation Measure 8-4). The construction contractor shall specify the use of electric stationary equipment (e.g., compressors) that can City 10 operate off the power grid where feasible. Where infeasible, stationary noise sources (e.g., generators and Engineer Q compressors) shall be located as far from residential receptor locations as is feasible (Mitigation Measure 8-5). Building Permit Issuance Construction shall be subject to any and all provisions set forth by the City of Diamond Bar Planning Department Planning; 11 (Mitigation Measure 8-6). Manager No residential units shall be located within 830 feet of the SR -57 Freeway's nearest travel lane unless additional 12 sound attention is provided to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director (Mitigation Measure 8-7). Community Development Director Final Tract Map Recordation No residential units shall be located within 130 feet of the centerline of Diamond Bar Boulevard unless additional 13 sound attention is provided to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director (Mitigation Measure 8-8). Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 September 2012 Addendum No. 1: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295 Page 45 "Site D" Specific Plan City of Diamond Bar, California Table A-2 (Continued) VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 72296 PPVI-qF=n MITIrATION REPORTING AND MONITORING PROGRAM Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 September 2012 Addendum No. 1: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295 Page 46 7;777777�, �c R 1, i ";j, 'o 6r] ic tlon',� :Mlieitdni�. 2� Cultural Resources Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a qualified archaeologist shall be retained by the Applicant and Community approved by the City to monitor all vegetation removal and ground disturbance to a depth of three feet within the Development following portions of the study area: (1) the boundary of SD -Cultural -1; (2) the open valley floor adjacent to SD- Director Issuance of 14 Cultural -1; and (3) the riparian areas that were not previously surveyed due to dense vegetation cover. The and Grading archaeologist will determine if additional monitoring below the depth of three feet is warranted based on soil and city Permits bedrock conditions and presence/absence of archaeological materials. No archaeological monitoring is required Engineer for ground disturbing activities outside of these monitor areas (Mitigation Measure 11-1). If cultural resources are identified during monitoring of the ground disturbing activities, the archaeologist shall be allowed to temporarily divert or redirect grading or excavation activities in the vicinity of those resources in order to make an evaluation of the find and determine appropriate treatment. Treatment will include the goals of preservation where practicable and public interpretation of historic and archaeological resources. All cultural F resources recovered will be documented on California Department of Parks and Recreation Site Forms to be filed with the CHRIS-SCCIC. The archaeologist shall prepare a final report about the monitoring to be filed With the Applicant, the City, and the California Historical Resources Information System South Central Coastal Information Center at the California State University, Fullerton (CHRIS-SCCIC), as required by the California Office of Historic 15 Preservation. The report shall include documentation and interpretation of resources recovered, if any. Interpretation will include full evaluation of the eligibility of SD -Cultural -1 with respect to the California Register of Historic Places and CEQA. The report shall also include all specialists' reports as appendices. The City shall designate repositories in the event that significant resources are recovered. If cultural resources are identified Building Construction during ground disturbing activities that occur outside the designated monitoring area, ground disturbing activities Inspector Term shall be temporarily redirected away from the vicinity of the find until the retained archaeologist is notified by the Applicant. The archaeologist shall coordinate with the Applicant as to the immediate treatment of the find until a proper site visit and evaluation is made by the archaeologist (Mitigation Measure 11-2), If human remains are encountered unexpectedly during construction excavation and grading activities, Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 requires that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin and disposition pursuant to Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources 16 Code. If the remains are determined to be of Native American descent, the County Coroner has 24 hours to notify the California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC)- The NAHC will then identify the person(s) thought to be the Most Likely Descendent of the deceased Native American, who will then help determine what course of action should be taken in dealing with the remains (Mitigation Measure 11-3). Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 September 2012 Addendum No. 1: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295 Page 46 "Site D" Specific Plan City of Diamond Bar, California Table A-2 (Continued) VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 72295 vcXnsRn IIAITIrAATION RFanRTwG ANn MONITORING PROGRAM 1 ri t 1 III Y ,F i� ��' 4 {: I III zlt ., pis } Ill 3111 i (I IyI(I II It{ t�Itilt F Y tiOrnpllahCe F 'Mdr atwn ; No I` I r f� TiiMitl atron'Me�su I,� " Veuiiaairon J(lilestone ..r Cultural Resources (Continued) Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a qualified paleontologist meeting the qualifications established by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontologists shall be retained by the Applicant and approved by the City to develop and Community implement a paleontological monitoring plan. Development of the monitoring plan shall include a site visit by the Development 17 paleontologist prior to initiation of project development in order to determine or delineate sensitive areas. The Director Issuance of paleontologist may also perform collections of fossils from the surface and near -surface (Mitigation Measure 11- Grading 4). Pe nits The paleontologist shall attend a pre -grade meeting in order to become familiar with the proposed depths and City 18 patterns of grading of the study area (Mitigation Measure 11-5). Engineer Issuance of shall establish a curation agreement with an accredited facility prior to grading permit issuance The paleontologist 9 City Grading 19 (Mitigation Measure 11-6). Engineer Permits A paleontological monitor, supervised by the paleontologist, shall monitor all excavations in the Puente Formation or excavations anticipated to extend into the Puente Formation. If fossils are found during ground -disturbing Building Construction 20 activities, the paleontological monitor shall be empowered to halt the ground -disturbing activities within 25 feet of Inspector Term the find in order to allow evaluation of the find and determination of appropriate treatment (Mitigation Measure 11- 7). The paleontologist shall prepare a final report on the monitoring. If fossils were identified, the report shall contain Community an appropriate description of the fossils, treatment, and curation. A copy of the report shall be fled with the City Development Grading 21 and the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and shall accompany any curated fossils (Mitigation Director Sign -Off Measure 11-8). Aesthetics All pole -mounted or wall -mounted luminaires installed for the purpose of illuminating homes, public park areas, private roadways, and driveways shall conform to appropriate lighting standards and demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, that light trespass will not exceed 0.5 horizontal foot candle, as measured at the City Building Permit 22 project boundaries abutting any existing residential use. These standards shall not be applied to any public Engineer Issuance streets or to any entry feature or other City -oriented signage to be constructed on or adjacent to the project site (Mitigation Measure 12-1). Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 September 2012 Addendum No. 1: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295 Page 47 UN i ITTOW 11 FA ► I W. Addendum to the SDSP Final EIR Copies of the Addendum to the Site D Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report, dated September 2013, are available for public inspection and review at the City Clerk's Office in City Hall. ATTACHMENT 5 Site D Specific Plan Public Notification Process Outreach efforts to solicit citizen and public agency input throughout the Specific Plan process included the following actions: Notice of Preparation (NOP): The City circulated a NOP to public agencies, special districts, and members of the public requesting such notice for a 30 -day period commencing February 1, 2008 and ending March 5, 2008. Scoping Meeting: During the NOP pe€8d, the City advertised a public scoping meeting on February 21, 2008 held at `the South Coast Air Quality Management District/Government Center, Room CC -6. The meeting was intended to facilitate public input. Approximately 20 residents attended the meeting with the majority from the Ambushers Street neighborhood. Several issues raised at this meeting include impacts of view from Cherrydale, noise, traffic, buffer from commercial development, need for green space at entryway, preference to see residential development with less commercial, and to consider senior housing development. Notice of Completion/Availability: A Notice of Completion and Availability was filed with the Office of Planning and Research on June 22, 2009. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, a 45 -day public review period was from June 25, 2009 through August 10, 2009. Neighborhood Meeting: On August 3, 2009, a neighborhood forum was held at the Heritage Park Community Center to provide the public with an additional opportunity to ask questions and comment on the Draft Environmental Impact Report, prior to the close of the 45 -day public review period. All written and verbal public testimony was taken, and written responses to the comments and issues raised are provided in the Response to Comments on the Draft EIR. The Response to Comments included all comments received during the 45 -day public review period. CEQA requires that the City evaluate comments on environmental issues received from persons or agencies who prepared a written response. April 13, 2010 Planning Commission Meeting: Public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 1,000 -foot radius of the project site on March 22, 2010, and the notice was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin and San Gabriel Valley Tribune newspapers on April 2, 2010. The project site was posted with a notice display board, and a copy of the notice was posted at the City's three designated community posting sites. The draft Specific Plan and EIR were also posted on the City's website, and hard copies were available for review at City Hall and the Diamond Bar Branch of the Los Angeles County Library. 1 April 27, 2010 Planning Commission Meeting: The project was continued from the April 13, 2010 Planning Commission meeting, and therefore no further noticing was required. May 11, 2010 Planning Commission Meeting: The project was continued from the April 27, 2010 Planning Commission meeting, and therefore no further noticing was required. June 15, 2010 City Council Meeting: Public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 1,000 -foot radius of the project site on June 4, 2010, and the notice was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin and San Gabriel Valley Tribune newspapers. The project site was posted with a notice display board, and a copy of the notice was posted at the City's three designated community posting sites. The June 15, 2010 City Council staff report, attachments to the report, draft Specific Plan, and EIR were also posted on the City's website and hard copies were available for review at City Hall and the Diamond Bar Branch of the Los Angeles County Library. July 20, 2010 City Council Meeting: The project was continued from the June 15, 2010, City Council meeting, and therefore no further noticing was required. The July 20, 2010 City Council staff report and attachments to the report were also posted on the City's website. Community Workshop: A half-day community workshop was held on Saturday, October 16, 2010 from 8:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. Approximately 79 people were in attendance. The purpose of the workshop was to solicit public input, identify underlying concerns and site issues, investigate site constraints and opportunities, and build consensus. The workshop included the following series of interactive activities that provided design and programming input from the community: ➢ Site Awareness Tour: A 90 -minute walking tour of the site was conducted to educate the participants on the existing features, constraints and opportunities of the site. Participants were provided with a workbook to record their observations of the physical environment at 12 stations situated along the walking path; ➢ Group Activities: After the site tour, participants were divided into seven working groups. Two topics/questions were presented regarding the site, land use, opportunities, program and priorities. Participants were asked to individually respond on forms and then discuss within their group. Each group listed the top five issues and concerns from the two topics asked and reported their summary to all groups. The top five issues and concerns from these topics are listed below: Topic 1 What do you believe are the most important issues related to the development of Site D? ❖ Traffic 2 ❖ Park Space ❖ Residential Density ❖ Fiscal ❖ Property Value Topic 2 What suggestions can you think of to improve the Site D Specific Plan? ❖ Low Density Housing ❖ Park Do Over ❖ Access/Traffic ❖ Better Communication/Dissemination ➢ Planning/Design Charrette: Each group was then asked to develop a conceptual plan and design what they envision for the site on a topographic map, and presented their plan. Most groups had some consistent design elements for the site. The workshop facilitator prepared a summary chart which identified the top five suggested design elements for the site, listed below: 1. Low Density Homes; 2. Neighborhood/Community Park; 3. Trail; 4. Focal Point such as Windmill or Monument; and 5. Entry at Crooked Creek Drive A summary of the community input from the workshop was presented at the Walnut Valley Unified School District Board Special Meeting on November 9, 2010. October 19, 2010 City Council Meeting: Although not legally required to renotice, on October 8, 2010, staff mailed a notice to all property owners within 1,000 feet of the property, including all speakers who testified at previous meetings. November 16, 2010 City Council Meeting: Although not legally required to renotice, on November 5, 2010, staff mailed a notice to all property owners within 1,000 feet of the property, including all speakers who testified at previous meetings. December 7, 2010 City Council Meeting: Although not legally required to renotice, on November 23, 2010, staff mailed a notice to all property owners within 1,000 feet of the property, including all speakers who testified at previous meetings. December 21, 2010 City Council Meeting: The project was continued from the December 7, 2010, City Council meeting, and therefore no further noticing was required. 3 February 21, 2012 City Council Meeting: Public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 1,000 -foot radius of the project site on February 10, 2012, and the notice was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin and San Gabriel Valley Tribune newspapers. The project site was posted with a notice display board, and a copy of the notice was posted at the City's three designated community posting sites. The February 21, 2012 City Council staff report, attachments to the report, revised Specific Plan and Response to Comments 1 and 2 were also posted on the City's website and hard copies were available for review at City Hall and the Diamond Bar Branch of the Los Angeles County Library. 4 AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.1 ATTACHMENTS 2, 3, 4, 5 AND 6 ARE AVAILABLE TO BE REVIEWED AT BOTH DIAMOND BAR CITY HALL AND THE LIBRARY. G RECEIVED BY THE CIT' OF DIAMOND BAR Chieh Cheng Jing-RZO&HU 15 Al 9: 30 21583 Ambushers St. Diamond Bar, CA 91765 November 10, 2013 Community Development Department/ Planning Division City of Diamond Bar 21810 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Re: Willow Heights -Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295, Development Review, and Tree Permit- Planning Case No. PL 2013-229 ("Project') Dear Sir or Madam: We received a notice of public hearing in November 2013 regarding the captioned development plan. As property owners within a 1,000 foot radius of subject site, we would like to send our comments in writing and want to reject this proposal because the traffic on Diamond Bar Boulevard will be even worse. Thank you for your attention. Sincerely, Chieh Chen Jing -Ru Chen _t..t "� I may 0 f_ c NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING City of Diamond Bar, 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 (909) 839-7030 TO: Property Owners within a 1 000 foot radius of subject site FROM: City of Diamond Bar, Community Development Department/Planning Division NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, That the City Council will conduct a public hearing on the matters described in this notice to determine whether or not the subject requests shall be approved. DATE AND TIME OF HEARING: Tuesday, November 19, 2013, 6:30 P.M. (or as soon thereafter that the matter can be heard) PLACE OF HEARING: Diamond Bar City Hall – Windmill Community Room 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 SUBJECT: Willow Heights—Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295, Development Review, and Tree Permit - Planning Case No. PL 2013-229 ("Project") REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of a Vesting Tentative Tract Map to subdivide an existing vacant 30 -acre lot into 63 lots for the development of 182 for -sale dwelling units and a minimum two -acre neighborhood public park. A Development Review is being requested for the proposed architectural and landscape design elements associated with the proposed residential component of Site D, and a Tree Permit is also requested to remove 83 existing protected trees, consisting of 75 Southern Black Walnuts, 6 Willows and 2 Coast Live Oaks, and replace them at a 3:1 ratio with 75 Coast Live Oak and 174 Sycamore trees. The property is zoned Specific Plan (SP) with a consistent underlying General Plan land use designation of Specific Plan. PROJECT ADDRESS: Site comprised of approximately 30 -acres located at the southeast corner of Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard (Los Angeles County Assessor's Parcel Numbers 8714-002- 900,8714-002-901,8714-002-902,8714-002-903 and 8714-015-001) PROPERTY OWNERS: Walnut Valley Unified School District and City of Diamond Bar APPLICANT: Lennar Homes of California, Inc., 25 Enterprise, Suite 300, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City certified the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the Site D Specific Plan on February 21, 2012. The FEIR analyzed the potential environmental impacts resulting from the Site D Specific Plan's approval from both a programmatic and project - level perspective, analyzing the development of the project site for residential and recreational uses with accompanying on-site and off-site infrastructure improvements. With the submittal of a project -specific application, an Addendum to the FOR has been prepared, which includes minor technical changes and additions in order to determine the project's consistency with the Site D Specific Plan. Published in: San Gabriel Valley Tribune: Friday, November 8, 2013 Inland Valley Daily Bulletin: Friday, November 8, 2013 If you are unable to attend the public hearing, but wish to send written comments, please write to the City of Diamond Bar Community Development Department/Planning Division at the address given below. To preview case materials or for further information on this subject, please contact Senior Planner Grace S. Lee at (909) 839-7032. If you challenge this application and project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing. Site Aerial CASE MATERIALS are available for review between, the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. Monday through Thursday and 7:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on Friday, at the Community Development Department/Planning Division, 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765. Addendum No. 1 Response to Comments Vesting_ Tentative Tract Map No. 72295 Willow Heights Final Environmental Impact report "Site D" Specific Plan SCH No. 2008021014 Lead Agency: City of Diamond Bar Community Development Department 21810 Copley Drive, Second Floor Diamond Bar, California 91765-4178 Applicant: Lennar Homes of California, Inc. 25 Enterprise, Suite 300 Aliso Viejo, California 92656 November 2013 Addendum No. 1 Response to Comments Vesting Tentative Map No. 72295 Willow Heights Final Environmental Impact Report "Site D" Specific Plan SCH No. 2008021014 Lead Agency: City of Diamond Bar Community Development Department 21810 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, California 91765-4178 Applicant: Lennar Homes of California, Inc. 25 Enterprise, Suite 300 Aliso Viejo, California 92656 Prepared by: Environmental Impact Sciences 26051 Via Concha Mission Viejo, California 92691-5416 November 2013 "Site D" Specific Plan City of Diamond Bar, California Table of Contents List of Sections Section Paqe 1.0 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................1 2.0 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD REGARDING CHANNEL MODIFICATIONS .....................2 2.1 Site D Specific Plan.............................................................................................2 2.2 Final Environmental Impact Report......................................................................2 2.3 Addendum...........................................................................................................5 3.0 LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS....................................8 4.0 AIR RIGHTS FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES.........................................................................9 5.0 UNDERGROUNDING OF PUBLIC FACILITIES..............................................................9 6.0 CEQA COMPLIANCE....................................................................................................10 List of Figures Figure ARTC-1 Conceptual Alternative Drainage Plan...........................................................................6 ARTC-2 Standard Design Plan for a Double Box Culvert............................................................7 List of Attachments Attachment A Flood Permit Application B County Permit Policies C County Guidelines for Overbuilding and Air Rights D Urban Freeway Cap Parks Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 November 2013 Addendum No. 1 — Response to Comments Page i "Site D" Specific Plan City of Diamond Bar, California 1.0 INTRODUCTION At its meeting on November 19, 2013, with regards to Agenda Item No. 7.1 (Resolution No. 2013- 34: Approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295, Associated Development Review and Tree Permit Applications, and Addendum #1 to the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Site D Specific Plan [Planning Case No. PL2013-229] to Authorize the Development of 182 Residential Units and a 2.5 Net -Acre Neighborhood Public Park at the Southeasterly Corner of Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard, Diamond Bar, CA 91765, et al.), the City of Diamond Bar (City or Lead Agency) City Council (Council) voted to continue the agenda item to December 3, 2013 in order to give City staff an opportunity to provide more information about the "feasibility" of covering that segment of the Brea Canyon Flood Control Channel (Channel) located within the "Site D" study area.' The project modification posited by the Council is addressed herein both in the context of "covering" (i.e., building a cover over or overbuild) and "undergrounding" (i.e., replacing the existing open channel with a subsurface conduit). If it should so elect, the Council possesses the discretionary authority to condition Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 72295 (VTT 72295) in the manner it deems appropriate. Here, the condition under consideration is the imposition of a project -specific obligation to cover the Channel or to replace the existing open culvert with an underground pipeline. From an entitlement perspective, the imposition of that condition on VTT 72295 (should it be so imposed) alters the proposed project in a physical way and, in so doing, potentially changes the project description and environmental analysis presented in the "Final Environmental Impact Report — `Site D' Specific Plan, SCH No. 2008021014" (FEIR)z and in the "Addendum No. 1 to the Final Environmental Impact Report — `Site D' Specific Plan, SCH No. 2008021014" (City of Diamond Bar, September 2013) (Addendum). This "Addendum — Response to Comments" (Addendum RTC) examines the environmental and other implications of that action and presents the Community Development Department's (Department) preliminary assessment whether that condition results in any significant impacts to the natural and human environment and can be accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable time period.3 In processing VTT 72295 and in its consideration of the subdivision of the "Site D" planning area, the City has elected to defer review of the final park plan until a later date. As illustrated in VTT 72295, two separate lots would be created which collectively comprise the entirety of the neighborhood park. The Channel bifurcates the proposed neighborhood park area, separating the 0.9 -acre "park" located to the west of and the 3.8 -acre "rain garden park/basin" located to the east of the Channel. As such, the Council retains the option to act on this item either as an integral part of VTT 72295 or, subject to the imposition of specified performance standards, to defer any action thereupon until the detailed park plan is brought back for the Council's consideration.4 1/ The project site is located in the Diamond Bar Creek watershed which constitutes a portion of the San Jose Creek subwatershed of the San Gabriel River watershed. 2/ The FEIR included, but was not limited to, the "Draft Environmental Impact Report —'Site D" Specific Plan, SCH No. 2008021014" (DEIR) and the "Response to Comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report —'Site D' Specific Plan, SCH No. 2008021014." 3/ As defined in the State CEQA Guidelines, "feasible" is defined to mean "capable of being accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable period of time, taking into account economic, environmental, legal, social, and technological factors" (14 CCR 15364). 4/ Section 15300 et seq. of the State CEQA Guidelines identifies certain "classes" of projects as being categorically exempt, acknowledging that those projects "do not have a significant effect on the environment and they are declared to be categorically exempt from the requirements for the preparation of environmental documents." Pursuant to Section 15302 therein, "Class 2 consists of replacement or reconstruction of existing structures and facilities Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 November 2013 Addendum No. 1 — Response to Comments Page 1 "Site D" Specific Plan City of Diamond Bar, California With regards to the Channel, based on the information presented in the Applicant's tentative subdivision map, assuming a 50 -foot width and a maximum length of 565 -foot length, the area now under consideration for possible coverage or undergrounding equates to about 0.65 acres (28,250 square feet). Alternatively, the DEIR assumed that the LACFCD's real property interests within the "Site D" planning area totaled about 0.75 acres. Although the actual County acreage and the area of possible Channel coverage may be less, the 0.75 -acre assumption is retained herein. In the event that the County's property were to be added to the area now identified by the Applicant as located within the boundaries of the current conceptual park plan, as potentially envisioned by the proposed condition, the park acreage within the "Site D" planning area might, therefore, increase by up to an additional 0.75 acres.5 Conversely, if the Applicant elects not to increase the size of the park beyond what is now proposed, a reduction in the size and reconfiguration of the two parcels comprising the park site would logically occur. 2.0 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD REGARDING CHANNEL MODIFICATIONS Both the "'Site D' Specific Plan" (SDSP) and the FEIR contain information relevant to the Channel's coverage or replacement with an underground pipeline. Information relevant to the proposed condition, as extracted from those two documents, is presented below. 2.1 Site D Specific Plan The SDSP contains a number of references to the possible coverage of the Channel. As indicated therein: (1) "The SDSP was originally envisioned to be a mixed use project, consisting of half of the site planned for a shopping center with frontages along Brea Canyon Road and Diamond Bar Boulevard (and covering the channel), and the other half planned for up to 202 dwelling units" (p. 3); (2) "The Los Angeles County Flood Control District owns the channel separating the City and School District properties. The channel will most likely not be covered, but there may be an opportunity for it to be integrated into the trail system along Brea Canyon Road to the north and south, as well as connect to the walking trails within the project site" (p. 3); and (3) "The Brea Canyon Channel which runs through a small portion of the site may be covered as part of the development and will be available for parking and landscape uses only" (p. 26). The Channel's coverage was contemplated in the SDSP; however, the SDSP neither mandated the Channel's coverage nor precluded that action as a possible project component. 2.2 Final Environmental Impact Report The possible coverage of that portion of the Channel located within the "Site D" property, identified as Los Angeles County Private Drain No. 395 (PD 395), was examined in the FEIR, of which the where the new structure will be located on the same site as the structure replaced and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity as the structure replaced." Reference to the above cited statutory provision is not intended to indicate the City's ability to avail itself of that option but to indicate that the State Legislature has determined that certain "replacement and reconstruction" activities do not have the potential to produce significant environmental effects. 5/ Neither the FEIR nor the Addendum explicitly addressed the additional park acreage resulting from the coverage or undergrounding of the existing Channel. The FEIR did, however, assume the inclusion of and the modification of the Channel for the purpose of CEQA compliance. Absence specificity as to the precise nature of park improvements, from a broad environmental perspective, the expansion of park facilities would appear to have minimal environmental effects. When final park improvement plans are brought back for the Council's consideration, additional environmental review may be required in order to ensure that the nature of the proposed improvements and on-site amenities do not introduce new significant effects not previously considered by the Lead Agency. Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 November 2013 Addendum No. 1 — Response to Comments Page 2 "Site D" Specific Plan City of Diamond Bar, California "Draft Environmental Impact Report —'Site D' Specific Plan, SCH No. 2008021014" (DEIR) was a part. The following excerpts are extracted from the DEIR. As initially formulated, the "Site D" project was a mixed-use development involving both commercial and residential uses. Under the initial design concept, the Channel was to be covered and the area located there above used for parking and site access. As indicated and illustrated in the DEIR (p. 2-7; Figure 2-7, p. 2-16): As illustrated in Figure 2-7 ("Site D" Specific Plan - Conceptual Drainage Plan), the existing Brea Canyon Storm Drain Channel will be covered and become an underground drainage facility as it traverses the project site. To convey the 50 -year discharge, the proposed channel section will be 9 - feet wide by 8 -feet wide, double cell, reinforced concrete box (RCB) with an average cover of 20 feet. Fifty feet of transition box will be constructed from the proposed RCB section to the existing culvert section under Diamond Bar Boulevard. A transition structure downstream of the proposed RCB will be constructed to join the existing trapezoidal channel. That graphic is included as Figure ARTC-1 (Conceptual Alternative Drainage Plan) herein. With regards to discretionary permit, the DEIR (p. 2-22) stated that: [T]he project involves both the acceptance of the design and construction of the on-site storm drain system by the LACDPW [Los Angeles County Department of Public Works] and, through the conveyance of a leasehold interest, the LACDPW's authorization allowing the overbuilding (covering), air rights transference, and use of lands atop the Brea Canyon Storm Drain Channel for project -related purposes. With regards to conveyance of "air rights" above the Channel, the DEIR (p. ES -1) noted: The Brea Canyon Storm Drain Channel (Brea Canyon Channel), which runs generally parallel to Brea Canyon Road, separates the District Property from the City Property. The LACFCD's approximately 0.75 -acre facility (County Property) is presently an open box culvert. In accordance with the LACFCD's "Guidelines for Overbuilding and Air Rights," in combination with such other standards and procedures as may be established by the County, leasehold interests in the "air rights" above the channel could be conveyed to a non -County entity, thus allowing the channel to be covered and the lands situated above that facility used for other purposes. With regards to the LACDPW, the DEIR (p. 4.4-6) noted: The Brea Canyon Storm Drain Channel, which traverses the project site, is under the jurisdiction of the Los Angeles County Flood Control District (District), a division of the LACDPW. The County has developed "guidelines" for uses of the District's rights-of-way by other parties for "overbuilding open channels and covering storm drains to create surface Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 November 2013 Addendum No. 1 — Response to Comments Page 3 "Site D" Specific Plan City of Diamond Bar, California areas, to identify and resolve areas of incompatibility, and to provide the basic requirements for specific proposals that will maximize the long-range benefits to the public and the District."' As indicated therein, for operating rights-of-way, overbuilding will be allowed provided the District's needs for flood control and all existing foreign uses authorized by the District are protected or provided for. Proposed uses must accommodate recreational, utility, transportation, public housing, and open space requirements that are programmed for the channel in question.' County guidelines indicate that, in order to optimize safety and ensure the hydraulic and structural integrity of a particular flood control channel, the District and the ACOE [United States Army Corps of Engineers] have a number of operational requirements that must be met by every joint -use proposal. Those requirements include, but may not be limited to, the following: (1) Access into a covered channel is required every 500 feet; this access is usually of a pedestrian nature and could be in the form of manholes and ladders; (2) Adequate clearance inside the channel (a minimum height of channel wall) must be maintained throughout the channel for the transportation of heavy equipment used in channel repair, bridge, and bridge abutment repair; and (3) In the event the channel is covered, adequate ventilation must be provided to prevent the build-up of noxious or volatile fumes; a short reach of the channel shall remain uncovered, thereby aiding channel maintenance and repair.3 Footnotes (Note footnote numbering is altered herein from the original): 1. Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, Los Angeles County Flood Control District, Guidelines for Overbuilding and Air Rights, revised June 2004, p. 2. 2. The District is developing a Property Use Plan (PUP) for each major flood control channel to ensure that the channel rights-of-way are developed in a manner compatible with the adjoining properties and yield the maximum benefit to the local community. Proposals should be in conformance with the PUP; however, if a desired use is different, the project proponent will be required to submit a change (amendment) to the PUP for approval. An amendment may be acceptable, provided the change for a particular reach of channel is between successive streets and approved by the local planning agency. In addition, all environmental requirements need to be fulfilled to the satisfaction of the Lead Agency. 3. Ibid. [Op Cit.], pp. 6-7. If the Channel were to covered, the DER (p. 4.4-17) identified the following "condition of approval" (Condition of Approval 4-1, renumbered 4-2 in the FEIR) relating to that action: If the flood control channel right-of-way is to be utilized as part of the project's development plan, prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall obtain all requisite permits and approvals from the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works — Flood Control District allowing for the overbuilding of the Brea Canyon Storm Drain Channel and shall provide the City Engineer with documentation, acceptable to the City Engineer, demonstrating County approval and authorization, including a complete list of all permit requirements that may be associated therewith. Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 November 2013 Addendum No. 1 — Response to Comments Page 4 "Site D" Specific Plan City of Diamond Bar, California A project -specific hydrology study, examining coverage of the Channel, was included in Appendix E (Preliminary Hydrology and Water Quality Analysis') of the DER. As indicated, in part, therein: According to the record plans for Brea Canyon Channel (LACDPW private drain No. 395), 25 -year discharge of 2,285 cfs [cubic feet per second] is shown at downstream side of Diamond Bar Boulevard culvert. LACDPW has requested the improvements shall be designed to meet 50 -year storm runoff which is converted to 2,602 cfs. Again, for direct summation of two flows from the site and from the Channel, the 50 -year discharge is calculated as 2,777 cfs at this reach ... The proposed grading plan indicates that the existing Brea Canyon Channel at this reach will be replaced with reinforced concrete box (RCB) and the area created will be used for parking or landscaping. An existing tributary open channel east of project will be replaced with RCB as well for a proposed entrance to the site. To convey the 50 -year discharge, proposed channel section shall be double cells 9 feet wide by 8 feet high RCB with average 20 feet cover based on the proposed grading plan. 50 feet of transition box will be constructed from proposed RCB section to existing culvert section under Diamond Bar Boulevard. The County's "standard" design plan for a double reinforced concrete box (RCB) culvert was presented in the DER and is included herein as Figure ARTC-2 (Standard Design Plan for a Double Box Culvert). Other design options (e.g., circular pipe, pipe -arch, arch) and characteristics (e.g., flexible, semi -flexible, or rigid structures) may exist but were neither included nor discussed therein. Because the existing Channel's capacity is less than the existing 50 -year storm flow, even absent any increased flows associated with the proposed project, improvements to that segment of the Channel may be required (by others). As a result, the FEIR included the following mitigation measure (Mitigation Measure 4-1)': Prior to the issuance of grading permits, all drainage facilities and improvements shall be subject to final design and engineering review and approval by the City Engineer and, for those storm drain facilities under County jurisdiction, by the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW). 2.3 Addendum With the exception of the proposed pedestrian and service vehicle -only bridge constructed across the Channel and physically connecting the "park" and "rain garden/basin," the Addendum contains no additional information or analysis (beyond that presented in the FEIR) relating to the further coverage of the Channel and the environmental impacts resulting therefrom. 6/ PENCO Engineering, Inc., Preliminary Drainage Report for Site 'D' Improvements at Intersection of Diamond Bar Boulevard and Brea Canyon Road, Diamond Bar, California, February 7, 2008, revised April 6, 2009. '/ That mitigation measure is inclusive of the currently proposed bridge crossing the Channel and connecting the "park" and "rain garden/basin" and, if the project were to be modified to include the Channel's coverage, would include the Channel improvements identified herein. Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 November 2013 Addendum No. 1 — Response to Comments Page 5 "Site D" Specific Plan City of Diamond Bar, California PIPE CL PROP. Ur ROPE TO JOIN EX. P1Jy'UERf - \ PROP JOM EI TO %jjjjjj TC JOINIFYRANS OjSFRET UC� BAEq CANYpv AOgD, BHEA CANYON CHANNEL = \t EX. TRAPEZOIDAL TRANSITION i DOU91 CHANNEL FROM TRAPEZOID L �/� -��'` Al a' BOTTOM WIDTH TO DOBLE CELLS. 1.5:1 SIDE SLOPE BOB 8' HIGH ✓ \ FINISH€0 GRADE 'ROP. CONNECTION 14 - STORM DRAIN FROM J PROJECT (48' RCP) 413.27' ` CELLS 9'(W) BY $(H) RCB ACE COVER - 20 FEET a � o LGRAPHIC SCALE 50 D 50 ( IN FEET 1 inch 50 ft. � EX. DOUBLE CELL r7 8' BY 8' RCB = \ ---- --� 50' \ v� RANS171DN —RCB Figure ARTC-1 CONCEPTUAL ALTERNATIVE DRAINAGE PLAN Source: PENCO Engineering, Inc. Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 November 2013 Addendum No. 1 — Response to Comments Page 7 "Site D" Specific Plan City of Diamond Bar, California IT W a See Nate 5 spacl g SPan "g" bars S�� NumDar "f" Dor j ROOF SECTION SPANS 4'THRU 8' q INVERT SIMILAR / 1 :1� e" bars, sea Note $ See Nate 6� Alternative Const Jt� Canat Jt--, EXTERIOR WALL SECTION SPANS 4' THRU 8' "g" hers q 2" Cir TYP L+ (ap+iana"f"^ oars R4 T RCB �----�^M:: in fill®+ bar — 0.25 5 #44 "tl" 00 8 0.25x4- 5 #4 '16, For 'M4 1-- We Is, -C" w4 C m 10e le Max m 16 Ma et4 0 YPc. Al+erne+l 3see Confit Jt� Nat- 4 ontl 3 Invert Elev Sinn a. d9.1 ra'a—,bars T2 SPan, 5 TYPICAL SECTION SPANS 4' THRU S' r F-a— hateZ" CIr TYP "0" bora b" ba YS � �q" Min fillet a"bars C.25 5 14 "d" bars or 0.25 5 ��mm��m�mm���mm�sel��mm��mm�mml�ml�l��mm�m�mmml� a4 0 1e, far cover over 1D' -O" 114 0 18 Me. 9" bars See Nate 5 �f�i�ii➢®®®F�®®®®®i�Fi�li�m®1f9®�®�®I�®ice®mmmmmm®�®�®mmmfl� 18Maxc Const JT AlternativeConst L11-1 �mmmmmammmmm®®®[�[r�m��mor�mmam�l�mmm�m®gym®mm��» Cans,Jte, o" bars Slope 46:1 ®tiYBlY�m®f}�®�t�ei�R�mom m =10111M ts�mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmli�mmmm�mmmmmmmf�mmmmmmmmmmm ®E Immmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmlm mlmmm ��mmm0®©mml3imHimmaEYiRICi�mt3ill31m©®®mm®mmmmmm®mmm®m Om m ®�mmmmt�mmmm®IDm®mOF�immf�i�m�Q:lm�mmm0�mmm�lEli�E�m13�L3imm Imo®' SEE EM®' Im ���4YYf�®�®�����IYCI�®�®�®®®®r! �mm 3-00 wY/rslie'e[IY.�®�®IY'M�W[f®®WN®filtl __®mm�®®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmlE3l��Omm 1=1121 ®' �mm0®mm®m®m®�®�®®®mm0©®®m� MIZIMMIMMIZIMMMMMIM : • OmmmmmmmOmm EMClC������®fm�m®im������fm�mm a See Nate 5 spacl g SPan "g" bars S�� NumDar "f" Dor j ROOF SECTION SPANS 4'THRU 8' q INVERT SIMILAR / 1 :1� e" bars, sea Note $ See Nate 6� Alternative Const Jt� Canat Jt--, EXTERIOR WALL SECTION SPANS 4' THRU 8' "g" hers q 2" Cir TYP L+ (ap+iana"f"^ oars R4 T RCB �----�^M:: in fill®+ bar — 0.25 5 #44 "tl" 00 8 0.25x4- 5 #4 '16, For 'M4 1-- We Is, -C" w4 C m 10e le Max m 16 Ma et4 0 YPc. Al+erne+l 3see Confit Jt� Nat- 4 ontl 3 Invert Elev Sinn a. d9.1 ra'a—,bars T2 SPan, 5 TYPICAL SECTION SPANS 4' THRU S' r F-a— hateZ" CIr TYP "0" bora "g" bora f' bars TYPICAL SECTION SPANS 10'THRU 14' AC I T, NOTES: I royami Cdaavrmale.:a>¢mw/»,wmr®.:w 1. For boxes with span or height less thou alts ofthose slw.wn In Table, sae next greater ST. box concrete dim_fcna and reinforcement. Make neceesarY changes In bar Isagths and quantitle6. 2. Far bases with soon ar height or cover greeter +hon t— shown in tables, a special design is re¢11red. 3. 0—titles are alap—1 oto and far design purposes only. 4. It 15 permiaa ihle fa eliminate the 'so. -dad on every ether "e" bar. 5. " bars are 1 half µpacing. rov 6. Pide paving —ah oton hen too ie expo -ed ma when poveme.I is portland cement concrete, and adjust quantities. 7. Far design and details not shown, see Sicnaord Plan DB2. 6. This plan sheet may be MeW for mul+iple call cuirerts by mak ng necessary adjustments. Q RLO Invert Fl- FLAT INVERT ALTERNATIVE Spavin Spa in "b" bars i — "f" ar "e" bars _ INVERT SIMILAR 6" a" bars "P" bars Sea Note 6 Epac ROOF SECTION J 1.i m SPANS 1 0' THRU 14' "b" bora nF u a" cors m bars, See Note E 'e" } EXTERIOR WALL SECTION SPANS 10' THRU 14' STATE OF CALIFORNIA pEPARiMENT DF TRANEPORTATisN CAST -IN-PLACE REINFORCED CONCRETE DOUBLE BOX CULVERT NO SCALE Figure ARTC-2 STANDARD DESIGN PLAN FOR A DOUBLE BOX CULVER Source: Los Angeles County Department of Public Works Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 November 2013 Addendum No. 1 — Response to Comments Page 8 b" ba YS � �q" Min fillet a"bars C.25 5 14 "d" bars or 0.25 5 -�-� a4 0 1e, far cover over 1D' -O" 114 0 18 Me. 9" bars See Nate 5 18Maxc Const JT AlternativeConst L11-1 J Cans,Jte, o" bars Slope 46:1 "g" bora f' bars TYPICAL SECTION SPANS 10'THRU 14' AC I T, NOTES: I royami Cdaavrmale.:a>¢mw/»,wmr®.:w 1. For boxes with span or height less thou alts ofthose slw.wn In Table, sae next greater ST. box concrete dim_fcna and reinforcement. Make neceesarY changes In bar Isagths and quantitle6. 2. Far bases with soon ar height or cover greeter +hon t— shown in tables, a special design is re¢11red. 3. 0—titles are alap—1 oto and far design purposes only. 4. It 15 permiaa ihle fa eliminate the 'so. -dad on every ether "e" bar. 5. " bars are 1 half µpacing. rov 6. Pide paving —ah oton hen too ie expo -ed ma when poveme.I is portland cement concrete, and adjust quantities. 7. Far design and details not shown, see Sicnaord Plan DB2. 6. This plan sheet may be MeW for mul+iple call cuirerts by mak ng necessary adjustments. Q RLO Invert Fl- FLAT INVERT ALTERNATIVE Spavin Spa in "b" bars i — "f" ar "e" bars _ INVERT SIMILAR 6" a" bars "P" bars Sea Note 6 Epac ROOF SECTION J 1.i m SPANS 1 0' THRU 14' "b" bora nF u a" cors m bars, See Note E 'e" } EXTERIOR WALL SECTION SPANS 10' THRU 14' STATE OF CALIFORNIA pEPARiMENT DF TRANEPORTATisN CAST -IN-PLACE REINFORCED CONCRETE DOUBLE BOX CULVERT NO SCALE Figure ARTC-2 STANDARD DESIGN PLAN FOR A DOUBLE BOX CULVER Source: Los Angeles County Department of Public Works Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 November 2013 Addendum No. 1 — Response to Comments Page 8 "Site D" Specific Plan City of Diamond Bar, California The Applicant's current development plan does not assume the Channel's coverage. Some modification of that plan would, therefore, be required in order to implement that condition. Changes could include, but may not be limited to, revisions to: (1) the conceptual park plan; (2) the proposed grading plan; and (3) the proposed drainage improvement plans. Although it can reasonably be assumed that any resulting changes would be relatively minor, the City should await receipt of additional information from the Applicant prior to any determination concerning the nature of those changes and their potential environmental significance. 3.0 LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS A permit from the LACDPW is required in order to build over an existing storm drain or within a flood control easement. A permit application, including plans and structural calculations indicating that the proposed improvements would neither detrimentally affect the storm drain system nor its maintenance, must be submitted to the LACDPW's Construction Division — Permits and Subdivisions Section (900 South Fremont Avenue, 8th Floor, Alhambra, CA 91803-1331). The permit application package is included in Attachment A (Flood Permit Application). County permit policies regarding work within flood control facilities are presented in Attachment B (County Permit Policies). As specified therein, construction work affecting channel capacity is prohibited between October 15 and April 15. That prohibition, in combination with the additional time period required to obtain a County permit, could affect the Applicant's development schedule. The LACFCD has formulated "guidelines" for "overbuilding and air rights." The LACFCD's "Guidelines for Overbuilding and Air Rights" (Revised June 2004) are included as Attachment C (County Guidelines for Overbuilding and Air Rights) herein. In accordance therewith, the LACFCD will allow overbuilding and use of air rights by a long-term lease over fee -owned property. Lease documents shall contain requirements protecting the County's interests and include provisions for receipt of rental income. Proposed uses must accommodate recreational, utility, transportation, public housing, and open space requirements that may be programmed for the affected channel. As specified, in part, therein: To optimize safety and ensure the hydraulic and structural integrity of a particular flood control channel, the [Los Angeles County Flood Control] District and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers have a number of operational requirements that must be met by every joint use proposal. The following is a list of the major requirements. Please note that this list should not be considered complete or absolute. The requirements are: (1) Access into a covered channel is required every 500 feet. This access is usually of a pedestrian nature and could be in the form of manholes, ladders, etc. (2) Adequate clearances inside the channel (a minimum height of channel wall) must be maintained throughout the channel for the transportation of heavy equipment used in channel repair, bridge, and bridge abutment repair, etc. (3) In the event the channel is to be covered, adequate ventilation must be provided to prevent the build-up of noxious or volatile fumes. A short reach of the channel, 30 feet or so, to remain uncovered, thereby aiding channel maintenance and repair in that equipment and material could be lowered into or removed from the channel. Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 November 2013 Addendum No. 1 — Response to Comments Page 8 "Site D" Specific Plan City of Diamond Bar, California The City is unaware of the existence of any "Property Use Plan" (PUP) which may have been formulated by the LACFCD for either the entirety of the San Gabriel River or for that segment of Diamond Bar Creek in the vicinity of the Channel. If a PUP has been developed, that document may include provisions relating to authorized and prohibited land uses atop the Channel. 4.0 AIR RIGHTS FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES The rights to lands above and below the ground are separable from surface rights. As indicated in the Tax Code: "A change in ownership of real property occurs pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code section 60 upon the transfer of air rights located directly above the land surface which establishes their legal description. Air rights are considered real property by Property Tax Rule 124, which classifies them as land; a transfer of a present fee interest in air rights separate from the surface rights is legally possible since such rights are real property and part of land; and there should be a reappraisal of that portion of the land (air rights) that changes ownership." Although in a scale substantially larger than now under consideration by the City, as indicated in Attachment D (Urban Freeway Cap Parks), the County is currently considering a number of proposals to construct public parks (identified as cap parks, highway parks, and deck parks) above existing freeway rights-of-way. Nationally, examples are cited where such facilities have already been successfully developed. Similarly, throughout the County, there are many examples of public use of flood control facilities. As indicated in the "Los Angeles River Master Plan" (Los Angeles County, June 1996): "While the primary purpose of the Los Angeles River is to provide flood protection for existing and anticipated land uses in the Los Angeles Basin, decreasing open space resources has led to renewed interest by the Citizens of Los Angeles County in exploring opportunities for the Los Angeles River to support compatible and multiple uses" (Section VII, p. 2-1). As in the case of the Los Angeles River, based on the specific facility, adaptive public use many not necessitate coverage or undergrounding. That option (i.e., expanded public use without coverage or undergrounding) does not, however, appear available with regards to the Channel based on the physical constraints imposed by the site and other proximal land uses. The proposed project modification would necessitate three -party negotiations (Applicant, City, and County), including consideration of construction, maintenance, and other costs, tenure, fee payments, and, with regards to decking, obligations for the possible repair and removal. Although it would appear that a leasehold interest represents the appropriate legal instrument to establish a multiple use, a leasehold might include an expiration when the City could be mandated to vacate its interests and cease its use. Subject to the recommendations of the City Attorney, a public -use easement might allow for the creation of a long-term public use absent a definitive tenure. 5.0 UNDERGROUNDING OF PUBLIC FACILITIES Currently, the Channel is a trapezoidal concrete -lined open drainage facility. Under Diamond Bar Boulevard, a double 8 -foot by 8 -foot RCB serves as roadway culvert. In contrast, the proposed project modification assumes a double 9 -feet by 8 -feet RCB. The FEIR notes that "50 feet of transition box will be constructed from [the] proposed RCB section to [the] existing culvert section under Diamond Bar Boulevard." No off-site improvements to the existing Channel were identified in the FEIR. Construction activities associated with Channel modifications in proximity to Diamond Bar Boulevard might, however, necessitate temporary lane closures. Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 November 2013 Addendum No. 1 — Response to Comments Page 9 "Site D" Specific Plan City of Diamond Bar, California In addition to new County permit requirements, because the proposed modification will directly impact Diamond Bar Creek, new or altered permit obligations which are not presently a part of the proposed project would be created with the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region (LARWQCB) (Section 401 water quality certification), California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) (Section 1602 streambed alteration agreement), and United States Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) (Section 404 permit). Any permit activities that may already be underway with those agencies would likely need to be modified based on the additional impacts resulting from the proposed storm drain improvements. Any new or altered permit requirements could result in a delay in project commencement. 6.0 CEQA COMPLIANCE As now proposed, the Applicant seeks to retain the open Channel; therefore, modifications to the Channel associated with VTT 72295 would be minimal (e.g., an existing tributary open channel located within the "Site D" planning area and to the east of Channel will be replaced with a RCB). Conversely, if covered, the existing open Channel would need to be removed, concrete and other materials removed from the site, grading in the vicinity of the channel would increase, a double RCB culvert (or alternative design) would need to be installed, and sufficient ground cover laid atop the subsurface facility. In order to provide adequate depth of soil atop the channel for landscaping, the Applicant's grading plans in the vicinity of the Channel and the proposed neighborhood park would likely need to be altered from the plans now before the Council. If retained as an open Channel, only minimal modifications to that facility would be required; however, if that facility were to be covered or replaced with an underground culvert (either by the Applicant or by others), additional engineering analysis would be required by the LACDPW. Because placing a deck above or placing a lid on the existing Channel could become flow constraining and could adversely affect upstream conditions, the County would likely impose additional design requirements relative to the nature of any associated on-site improvements. In addition, recognizing that storm drain systems constitute an interrelated network, requirements for additional off-site improvements (which are now not a part of the proposed project) could be imposed by the County for adjoining segments. Under both coverage options, the project's infrastructure improvement costs would increase and the project's effectuation could be delayed while detailed hydrology studies and engineering drawings are under review by the LACDPW and as a result of further permit review by the LARWQCB, CDFG and ACOE. To the extent that the information produced by those studies, infrastructure improvements, and permit obligations were to introduce significant new information, additional CEQA review would likely be required. With regards to the proposed condition, insufficient information is presently available to conduct an environmental assessment of the potential impacts associated with the coverage of the Channel. Similarly, because the inclusion of that condition has the potential to alter the design and development of VTT 72295 (e.g., revisions to the conceptual park, proposed grading, and proposed drainage improvement plans), it is not known to what extent the Addendum would need to be altered and/or whether the Addendum would continue to suffice as the appropriate manner of CEQA compliance. Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH 2008021014 November 2013 Addendum No. 1 — Response to Comments Page 10 Attachment A Flood Permit Application �y1�GEi�S 01 u� .o PUBLIC WUf KU G6r`s�hlce jp'��o LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 900 S. FREMONT AVE. ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91803-1331 TRACKING NO. FLOOD PERMIT APPLICATION DATERECEIVED: OWNER/ APPLICANT: TELEPHONE: ADDRESS: Street AGENT/ CONTACT: ADDRESS: E-MAIL City TELEPHONE: Zip Code Street City Zip Code SITE ADDRESS: Street City Zip Code NEAREST INTERSECTION: THOMAS GUIDE: SCOPE OF WORK: PERSON/AGENCY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE PROPOSED FACILITY: PHONE: ( ) The undersigned certifies that the applicant for this permit is familiar with the requirements of the County Lobbyist Ordinance (Los Angeles County Code Chapter 2.160), and that all persons acting on behalf of the applicant have complied with and will continue to comply with this ordinance throughout the application process. It is further agreed that the Owner/Applicant is the financially responsible party for all fees, deposits, charges, collections and refunds, regardless if payment is made by others Print Name of Owner/Applicant Signature of Owner/Applicant Date Submittal Requirements: 1. Four sets of final construction plans (seven if the Corps is involved) with structural details and profiles of the existing and proposed facilities. 2. Two sets of letter size structural and/or hydraulic and hydrology calculations. The plans and calculations must be stamped and signed by a registered civil/structural engineer licensed to practice in the State of California. 3. Four copies of the As -Built drawings of the District's facility impacted by the proposed work and two of the right-of-way map. 4. Letter from Owner/Applicant authorizing Agent/Contact to request a permit on their behalf. 5. For storm drain connections, complete EXHIBIT "A" when applicable, and submit SUSMP. 6. Fees will be charged according to the current ordinance established by the Board of Supervisors 7. Certificate of Liability Insurance ($1 Million minimum coverage) and additional insured endorsement naming the County of Los Angeles, the Los Angeles County Flood Control District, and, when applicable, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as co-insured. 8. Complete and sign acknowledgement that Applicant has read, understands, and agrees to fully comply with the Best Management Practices (BMP) Attachment to this permit per Los Angeles County Code Chapter 12.80 Stormwater and Runoff Pollution Control. The applicant must show that the proposed work will not adversely affect the District's interests; i.e., (1) Hydraulic and Hydrologic Design; (2) Structural integrity; (3) Maintenance standards; (4) District's property rights, etc. PAYMENT Issuance Fee: $ Plan Check: $ Inspection: $ Other: $ Total: $ TYPE torm rain onnectior atch asin Relocation u Lbatch asin Modification INFO Stream/Project FOR DISTRICT USE ONLY RECEIVED BY: ASSIGNED TO: Project No. (Fee or AC) Project No. (Fee or AC) Project No. (Fee or AC) Project No. and apin 1 u ajor odifications inor odificationsu File Code Suc inerued RU tin MDLtw ES-M;.ES M[ CE,11111 RD�u PM DD QED uW L6�MER� MD KOad nit UOtheru Uoverbtddu triilidtgy�rossingu PD/MTD (To be Transferred) Tract/P.M. No. P:\Idpub\Permits\Flood Unit\Flood Permit Application APPROVED BY MA 11-2011 NO -u P.O. # 1 OF 2 FOR DISTRICT USE ONLY (Preliminary Check) General ❑ Incomplete packages are NOT accepted ❑ Plan Check and Inspection fees included ❑ Vicinity Map ❑ Affected facility (i.e. MTD, RDD, & etc.) has been transferred to the District for maintenance General Engineering Requirements ❑ Two sets of calculations and/or reports stamped and signed by a Civil/Structural/Geotechnical Engineer ❑ Four sets of plans (seven for Army Corp facilities) signed and stamped by a Civil/Structural/Geotechnical Engineer ❑ Four copies of District's facility "As -Built" drawings that are affected by the proposed work ❑ Name of affected District facility shown on the plans for the proposed work ❑ Plan, Profiles, Elevations, Sections, and Details for the proposed work Storm Drain Connections ❑ Existing hydraulic and hydrology data of the District's facility impacted by the proposed connection ❑ Obtain the "Allowable Q" from Design Division ❑ Revised Hydraulic calculations taking into account the proposed connection ❑ Water quality agreement signed and notarized (Not always required) ❑ Stationing along LACFCD's storm drain centerline where the proposed connection is located ❑ SUSMP Catch basin relocation ❑ Existing catch basin hydrology and design data included. ❑ Revised catch basin hydrology and design data included. ❑ Connector pipe hydraulics. ❑ Street capacity calculations Crossings over channels ❑ Water surface and pier loss calculations ❑ Structural calculations for the bridge/ utility crossing including surcharges on the District facility ❑ Plan and profile plans Overbuilds ❑ Right-of-way letter of approval from the underlying fee owner ❑ Two copies of the structural calculations for added surcharges on the District facility ❑ Two copies of the right-of-way map ❑ Two copies of the easement documents (if LACFCD is not the underlying fee owner) Utility Crossings Under -crossing ❑ Plan and profile of proposed utility showing the District storm drain ❑ Method of support and structural calculations ❑ Two copies of right-of-way map and four copies of the "as built" Over -crossing ❑ Plan and profile of proposed utility showing the District storm drain ❑ Two copies of right-of-way map and four copies of the "as built" ❑ Structural calculations for added surcharges on the District facility Temporary Use Short Term Use (less than a year) ❑ Liability Insurance ($1,000,000 minimum coverage) including LACFCD/LACDPW as additionally insured ❑ Plot plan with north arrow and limits of affected areas Long Term Use (more than a year) ❑ Copy of Use Agreement, Recreation Agreement ❑ SDF Plot plan with north arrow and limits of affected areas P:\Idpub\Permits\Flood Unit\Flood Permit Application APPROVED BY MA 11-2011 2 OF 2 SAMPLE AUTHORIZATION LETTER (Authorizing Company/Party Letterhead) Date: Los Angeles County DPW Land Development Division 900 South Fremont Ave, 8th FL Alhambra, CA 91803 LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION Please be advised that (Owner/Applicant name or company name) authorizes (Individual name of/or company name) to act as an agent on my (our) behalf in all matters related to obtaining a(n) (permit type) permit. Our Agent is designated and responsible for the following: ❑ Deliver our payment for fees and deposits ONLY. ❑ Provide payment of fees and deposits ONLY. ❑ Other: I(we) further understand and agree that I(we) shall remain responsible for all permit conditions, permit provisions, fees, deposits, refunds, additional charges and collections resulting from permit application processing, permit issuance and inspection of work. (Signature) (Print) Customer Name: Full Company Address: Email Address: Phone Number: Fax Number: P:\Idpub\Pernuts\Forms\Authorization\third-party-auth-form sample -approved by MA 11-14-201 Ldoc LIABILITY INSURANCE: The Permittee shall furnish the Agency a certificate of liability insurance with the Agency named as certificate holder and a copy of the Additional Insured Endorsement to the general liability insurance of the permittee's contractor. Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy or any subsequent endorsement attached thereto, the Agency shall be named as an additional insured covering the work, whether liability is attributable to the Permittee or the Agency. 1. The Permittee may file insurance acceptable to the Agency covering more than one permit. The coverage shall provide the following minimum limits: Bodily Injury ........... $ 250,000 each person $ 500,000 each occurrence $ 500,000 aggregate products and completed operations Property Damage ....... $ 100,000 each occurrence $ 250,000 aggregate 2. A combined single limit policy with aggregate limits in the amount of $ 1,000,000 will be considered equivalent to the required minimum limits. All liability insurance policies shall bear an endorsement or shall have attached rider whereby it is provided that, in the event of expiration or proposed cancellation of such policies for any reason whatsoever, the Agency shall be notified by mail, giving a sufficient time before the date thereof to comply with any applicable law or statute, but in no event less that 30 days before expiration or cancellation is effective. The Additional Insured Endorsement to the general liability insurance must contain the following language: "The County of Los Angeles and public entity or Special District for which the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors is the Governing Body, and theirAgents, Officers and Employees, shall be Additional insured(s) while acting within the scope of their duties against all claims arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed." P:\Idpub\Permits\Insurance\Insurance - Revised 10-NOV-2011.doc ACORD,. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE (MM/DD/YYYY) PRODUCER INSURANCE BROKER OR COMPANY NAME AND CONTACT INFORMATION, INCLUDING EMAIL ADDRESS THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC # INSURED COMPANY NAME AND CONTACT INFORMATION, INCLUDING A VALID EMAIL ADDRESS INSURERA: POLICY NUMBER INSURERB: POLICY EXPIRATION INSURERC: ATTENTION: INSURER D: GENERAL LIABILITY INSURER E: COVERAGES THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSRDD' LTRINSR ISSUING INSURER SHALL MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO P. O. BOX 1460 POLICY NUMBER POLICYEFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION LIMITS ATTENTION: GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ DAMAGE TO RENTED COMMERCIALGENERAL LIABILITY PREMISES Ea occur.... $ CLAIMS MADE � OCCUR MED EXP (Any one person) $ Sarn SONAL&ADVINJURY $ ERALAGGREGATE $ )I GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: ODUCTS -COMP/OPAGG $ POLICY PRO LOC AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT (Ea accident) $ BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ ALL OWNEDAUTOS SCHEDULEDAUTOS BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ HIRED AUTOS NON -OWNED AUTOS PROPERTYDAMAGE (Per accident) $ GARAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT $ OTHER THAN EA ACC $ ANY AUTO $ AUTOONLY: AGG EXCESS/UMBRELLA LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ OCCUR F—I CLAIMS MADE AGGREGATE $ $ DEDUCTIBLE $ RETENTION $ WORKERS COMPENSATION AND WC STATU- OTH- TORY LIMITS ER. EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? If yes, describe under SPECIAL PROVISIONS below . DISEASE- POLICY LIMIT $ OTHER C1 I DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/EXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT/ SPECIAL PVISIONS Please provide specific details such as project location, type of work, application tracking number, permit number, etc... CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE LAND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION ISSUING INSURER SHALL MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO P. O. BOX 1460 THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. ALHAMBRA, CA 91802-1460 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ATTENTION: ACORD 25 (2001/08) ©ACORD CORPORATION 1988 POLICY NUMBER: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CG 20 12 05 09 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. ADDITIONAL INSURED - STATE OR GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY OR SUBDIVISION OR POLITICAL SUBDIVISION - PERMITS OR AUTHORIZATIONS This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the follov ring: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART SCHEDULE State Or Governmental Agency Or Subdivision Or Politica Subdivision: The County of Los Angeles and public entity or Special District for which the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors is the Governing Body, and their Agents, Officers and Employees, shall be Additional insured(s) while acting within the scope of their duties against all claims arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed. Information required to complete this Schedule, if not shown P iove, will be shown in the Declarations. Section II — Who Is An Insured is amended to in- clude as an insured any state or governmental agency or subdivision or political subdivision shown in the Schedule, subject to the following provisions: 1. This insurance applies only with respect to opera- tions performed by you or on your behalf for which the state or governmental agency or subdivision or political subdivision has issued a permit or au- thorization. .. 2. This insurance does not apply to: a. "Bodily injury", "property damage" or "personal and advertising injury" arising out of operations performed for the federal government, state or municipality; or b. "Bodily injury" or "property damage" included within the "products -completed operations hazard". 0 CG 2012 05 09 © Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2008 Page 1 of 1 13 e�e$ c G 0 z b PUBLIC WORKS Po LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS G yr t f�cservtce Tra�a Acknowledgement Best Management Practices (BMP) Attachment DATE: PERMIT NO. OWNER/APPLICANT: ADDRESS: STREET FAX: ( ) CELL: ( ) PRINT NAME WET SIGNATURE (REQUIRED) CITY EMAIL ADDRESS: PHONE: ( 1 AGENT/CONTACT: PHONE: PRINT NAME WET SIGNATURE (REQUIRED) ADDRESS: ZIP CODE STREET CITY ZIP CODE FAX: ( ) CELL: ( ) EMAIL ADDRESS: hereby acknowledges reading, understanding, and agreeing to comply with the Best Management Practices (BMP) Attachment in accordance with Los Angeles County Code Chapter 12.80 Stormwater and Runoff Pollution Control. SITE ADDRESS: Street City Zip Code NEAREST INTERSECTION: THOMAS GUIDE: PLEASE SUBMIT THIS DOCUMENT WITH THE APPLICATION UPDATED 10-2009 POSTED 11/02/2009 Best Management Practices (BMPs) Attachment The Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW) requires Permittees and their contractors to implement a program to effectively control water pollution during all Permit construction projects. This project shall conform with the requirements of the following County Code and Permits: • Los Angeles, California County Code Chapter 12.80 Stormwater and Runoff Pollution Control • Waste Discharge Requirements for Municipal Storm Water and Urban Runoff Discharges within the County of Los Angeles, and the Incorporated Cities Therein, Except the City of Long Beach (Order No. 01-182, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System [NPDES] No. CAS004001), • NPDES General Permit No. CAS000002, Order No. 99-08-DWQ, Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges of Storm Water Runoff Associated with Construction Activities. The Permittee or Authorized Representative and their contractors shall know and fully comply with the applicable provisions of these permits and Federal, State and local regulations that govern the Permittee or Authorized Representative's operations and the storm water discharges from the project site. In order to ensure a minimum level of water quality control, the Permittee or Authorized Representative and their contractors shall effectively implement and maintain appropriate Best Management Practices (BMPs) shown in Table 1. In addition, the Permittee or Authorized Representative and their contractors shall comply with the following requirements: • Sediments shall not be discharged to the storm drain system or receiving waters. Sediments generated on the construction site shall be retained. • No construction -related materials: waste, spills, or residue shall be discharged from the project site to streets, drainage facilities, receiving waters, or adjacent property by wind or runoff. • Non -storm water runoff from equipment, vehicle washing, or any other activity shall be contained within the project site using appropriate BMPs. • Erosion from slopes and channels shall be prevented. • Minimize grading during the wet season (October 15 through April 15). All erosion susceptible slopes shall be covered, planted, or protected in any way that prevents sediment discharge from the project site. BMPs shall conform to the requirements in the LACDPW Construction Division's "Construction Site Best Management Practices (BMPs) Manual," and addenda thereto issued up to and including, the date of issuance of the Permit for the project. Copies of the Manual are available for purchase from: Los Angeles County Department of Public Works Cashier's Office 900 South Fremont Avenue Alhambra, CA 91803 Telephone (626) 458-6959 Year -Round Implementation Requirements The Permittee or Authorized Representative and their contractors shall have an effective program for implementing, inspecting, and maintaining water pollution control practices for wind erosion control, tracking control, non -storm water control, and waste management and materials pollution control. Soil stabilization and sediment control practices shall be provided throughout the rainy season, defined as between October 15 and April 15, and whenever the National Weather Service predicts rain within 24 hours. The National Weather Service weather forecast shall be monitored and used by the Permittee on a daily basis. The non -rainy season shall be defined as all days outside the defined rainy season. Disturbed soil areas within the project shall be protected in conformance with the requirements in the Construction Site BMP Manual with sediment controls implemented prior to a predicted rain event. Maintenance and Inspection The Permittee or Authorized Representative and their contractors shall be responsible throughout the duration of the project for installing, constructing, inspecting, maintaining, removing and disposing of the BMPs. Unless otherwise directed by LACDPW, the Permittee or Authorized Representative and their contractors are responsible for BMP implementation and maintenance throughout any temporary suspension of work. The Permittee or Authorized Representative shall reimburse LACDPW for the full costs of cleaning or repairing of storm drain, water course, or channel which may be necessary due to ineffective implementation of BMPs. The project site shall be inspected by the Permittee or Authorized Representative or their contractors a minimum of once every week or at least once for projects that last only one week or less. Report of Non -Permitted Discharge and Enforcement If the Permittee or Authorized Representative or their contractors identify any non -permitted discharge into the storm drain system or receiving waters in a manner causing, or potentially causing, a condition of pollution, or if the project receives a written notice or order from any regulatory agency, the Permittee or Authorized Representative or their contractors shall immediately inform LACDPW Construction Division Permits Section by calling the assigned Field Office. The Permittee or Authorized Representative or their contractors shall submit a written report (see attached Notice of Non -Permitted Discharge) to the LACDPW within 5 days of the discharge event, notice or order. The Permittee or Authorized Representative and their contractors are subject to enforcement action by Chapter 12.80 of the Los Angeles County Code that states, "Any person, firm, corporation, municipality or district or any officer or agent of any firm, corporation, municipality or district violating any provision of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. Such violation shall be punishable by a fine of not more than $1,000 or by imprisonment in the county jail for a period not to exceed six months, or by both fine and imprisonment. Each day during any portion of which such violation is committed, continued or permitted shall constitute a separate offense and shall be punishable as such (Ord. 98-0021§1 (part), 1998). " In addition, the Permittee or Authorized Representative and their contractors are subject to enforcement action by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), Environmental Protection Agency, private citizens and citizen groups. The Permittee or Authorized Representative and their contractors shall be responsible for the costs and for liabilities imposed by law as a result of the Permittee or Authorized Representative or their contractor's failure to comply. Costs and liabilities include, but are not limited to, fines, penalties and damages whether assessed against LACDPW or the Permittee or Authorized Representative or their contractors, including those levied under the Federal Clean Water Act and the State Porter Cologne Water Quality Act. Table 1 Construction Site BMPs ID BMP Name Minimum Requirement(') Tem or ry Soil Stabilization SS -1 Scheduling Preservation of Existing Vegetation SS -3 Hydraulic Mulch PX(2)SS-2 SS -4 Hydroseeding SS -5 Soil Binders SS -6 Straw Mulch SS -7 Geotextiles, Plastic Covers, & Erosion Control Blankets/Mats(3) SS -8 Wood Mulching SS -9 Earth Dikes/Drainage Swales & Ditches SS -10 Outlet Protection/Velocity Dissipation Devices SS -11 Slope Drains SS -12 Streambank Stabilization Tem or ry Sediment Control SC -1 Silt Fence (4) SC -2 Desilting Basin SC -3 Sediment Trap SC -4 Check Dam SC -5 Fiber Rolls SC -6 Gravel Bag Berm SC -7 Street Sweeping and Vacuuming X SC -8 Sandbag Barrier SC -9 Straw Bale Barrier SC -10 Storm Drain Protection X(2) Wind Erosion Control WE -1 I Wind Erosion Control X(2) Tracking Control TC -1 Stabilized Construction Entrance/Exit TC -2 Stabilized Construction Roadway TC -3 Entrance/Outlet Tire Wash Additional BMPs may be required based on actual field condition, Contractor operations, or construction operations. (Z) Not all minimum requirements may be applicable to every project. Applicability to a specific project shall be verified by the Permittee or Authorized Representative and their Contractor. (3) The Permittee or Authorized Representative and their Contractors shall select one of the identified soil stabilization BMPs or a combination thereof. (4) The Permittee or Authorized Representative and their Contractors shall select one of the identified sediment control barrier BMPs or a combination thereof. (5) Dewatering BMPs are required for discharging accumulated precipitation (rain and snow melt) and for potential contact with groundwater during excavation. Separate permit requirements are applicable for construction dewatering of groundwater. Table 1 (continued) Construction Site BMPs ID BMP Name Minimum Requirement(') Non -Storm Water Management NS -1 Water Conservation Practices NS -2 Dewatering Operations (5) NS -3 Paving and Grinding Operations NS -4 Temporary Stream Crossing NS -5 Clear Water Diversion NS -6 Illicit Connection/Illegal Discharge Detection and Reporting X NS -7 Potable Water/Irrigation NS -8 Vehicle Equipment Cleaning X NS -9 Vehicle Equipment Fueling X NS -10 Vehicle Equipment Maintenance X NS -11 Pile Driving Operations NS -12 Concrete Curing NS -13 Material and Equipment Use Over Water NS -14 Concrete Finishing NS -15 Structure Demolition/Removal Over or Adjacent to Waters NS -16 I Temporary Batch Plant Waste Management and Material Pollution Control WM-1 Material Delivery X WM-2 Material Use X WM-3 Stockpile Management WM-4 Spill Prevention and Control X WM-5 Solid Waste Management X(2) WM-6 Hazardous Waste Management WM-7 Contaminated Soil Management WM-8 Concrete Waste Management WM-9 Sanitary/Septic Waste Management X WM-10 Liquid Waste Management Additional BMPs may be required based on actual field condition, Contractor operations, or construction operations. (Z) Not all minimum requirements may be applicable to every project. Applicability to a specific project shall be verified by the Permittee or Authorized Representative and their Contractor. (3) The Permittee or Authorized Representative and their Contractors shall select one of the identified soil stabilization BMPs or a combination thereof. (4) The Permittee or Authorized Representative and their Contractors shall select one of the identified sediment control barrier BMPs or a combination thereof. (5) Dewatering BMPs are required for discharging accumulated precipitation (rain and snow melt) and for potential contact with groundwater during excavation. Separate permit requirements are applicable for construction dewatering of groundwater. Notice of Non -Permitted Discharge To: Date: Subject: Notice of Discharge Project Name: Permit Number: Date, time, and location of discharge: Type of operation that resulted in the discharge: Describe any adverse impacts resulting from the discharge: Describe existing BMP(s) in place prior to the discharge event: Date and type of corrective action or BMPs deployed after the discharge: Proposed corrective actions to be taken to reduce, eliminate, andlor prevent recurrence of the discharge: Name of Contact Person Company Signature Title Telephone Number Date Attachment B County Permit Policies PERMIT POLICY DURING THE STORM SEASON While it is the Department's Standard policy to not allow permitted work within a flood control facility during the specified storm season, we recognize the necessity of sometimes working within channels during the storm season. Although each case must be evaluated separately, the following guidelines are intended to serve as consistent instruction for reviewing such cases. CHANNELS Armorps Constructed Channels- No construction work whatsoever affecting the channel structure or carrying capacity during the period of October 15 to April 15. Access with mobile equipment, to be removed at the end of each workday, is allowed with a 5 -day clear weather forecast. No storage of equipment and materials is allowed within the channel/storm drain. Storm drain connection work is allowed if - 1. i1. Connecting pipe size is 24 -in. or less in diameter 2. Five-day clear weather forecast 3. Seal the opening on the channel with a 1/2 -inch steel plate extending 6 -inches beyond the opening in all directions at the end of each day. 4. Plate edges must be impermeable and secured with 1/2- inch diameter bolts spaced at 12 -inches. 5. Channel is rectangular (No connections to trapezoidal channels are allowed) L.A. County Flood Control District Channels- Limited work is allowed within the channels as long as full capacity can be maintained or restored within 5 -days of predicted rain. Access with mobile equipment, to be removed at the end of each workday, is allowed with a 5 -day clear weather forecast. No storage of equipment and materials is allowed within the channel/storm drain. Storm drain connection work is allowed if: 1. Connecting pipe size is 24 -in. or less in diameter 2. Five-day clear weather forecast 3. Seal the opening on the channel with a 1/2 -inch steel plate extending 6 -inches beyond the opening in all directions at the end of each day. 4. Plate edges must be impermeable and secured with 1/2- inch diameter bolts spaced at 12 -inches. 5. Channel is rectangular (No connections to trapezoidal channels are allowed) UNDERGROUND STORM DRAINS Limited work is allowed within the underground storm drains as long as full capacity can be maintained or restored within 5 -days of predicted rain. Storm drain connection work is allowed i£ 1. Connecting pipe size is 24 -in. or less in diameter 2. Five-day clear weather forecast 3. For concrete box mainlines seal the opening of the breakout limits with a %-inch steel plate extending 6 -inches beyond the opening in all directions at the end of each day. 4. Plate edges must be impermeable and secured with %2- inch diameter bolts spaced at 12 -inches. 5. For pipe to pipe connections the work must be started and completed prior to any forecasted rain. During the period from April 15 to October 15, falsework and cofferdams may be placed and excavations made in the channel. However, capacity to convey flows around any obstructions or openings in the channel lining shall be provided as follows: April 16 to May 31: 33% of design capacity. June 1 to August 31: 5% of design capacity. September 1 to October 14: 33% of design capacity. Hydraulic calculations substantiating capacity must be reviewed and approved prior to start of construction. I:\Section\Permits\Flood\Master\STORMPOLICY.wpd Attachment C County Guidelines for Overbuilding and Air Rights LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT GUIDELINES FOR OVERBUILDING AND AIR RIGHTS CONSTRUCTION DIVISION - PERMITS AND SUBDIVISIONS SECTION REVISED JUNE 2004 CONTENTS I. EXAMPLES OF OVERBUILDING 11 -1- TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 A. INTRODUCTION 2 B. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 2 1. Joint Use Right of Way 2 2. Master Planning 2 3. Compatibility 3 4. Indemnification and Insurance 3 C. CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS 3 1. Types of Overbuilding 3 2. Criteria for Design and Analysis for Overbuilding 4 3. Aesthetic Requirements 6 D. OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS 6 E. RIGHT OF WAY AVAILABILITY 7 1. Operating Right of Way 7 2. Excess Right of Way 7 F. OTHER REQUIREMENTS 7 G. DOCUMENTS 8 H. PROCEDURE TO BE FOLLOWED FOR USE OF DISTRICT'S FACILITIES 8 I. EXAMPLES OF OVERBUILDING 11 -1- GUIDELINES FOR OVERBUILDING AND AIR RIGHTS A. INTRODUCTION The purpose of these guidelines is to provide information relative to the various possible uses by other parties of the District's rights of way for overbuilding open channels and covered storm drains to create surface areas, to identify and resolve areas of incompatibility, and to provide the basic requirements for specific proposals that will maximize the long-range benefits to the public and the District. The guidelines recognize that channels and their rights of way, in addition to providing flood protection, have the potential as transportation, utility, and recreational corridors, for overbuilding for public housing development, and are also desired by some communities as open space areas. Requirements are included to protect the District's interest to ensure that proper operation and maintenance of the channels and other uses can be accomplished. Private parties are encouraged to use District's rights whenever a proposal is found to be compatible with District's needs and authorized or planned uses by others. To this end, the District's goal is to allow utilization of its rights of way to the most efficient degree possible. B. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Joint Use Right of Way Interested public agencies and developers should consult the District at an early stage regarding joint use, the extent of the rights held by the District, and the areas that may be reserved for other public uses. In some instances, competitive bidding for use of the right of way and air rights may be required. In those instances where District's holding is not of sufficient size to be useful in itself and a proposal is received to utilize District's open channel in conjunction with adjoining ownership, a bidding proposal will not be undertaken. For operating right of way, overbuilding by others will be allowed provided District needs for flood control and all existing foreign uses authorized by the District are protected or provided for as further described in Item 3 below. Proposed uses must accommodate recreational, utility, transportation, public housing, and open space requirements that are programmed for the channel in question. Master Planning District is developing a Property Use Plan (PUP) for each major flood control channel to ensure that the channel rights of way are developed in a manner compatible with the adjoining properties and yield the maximum benefit to the local community. Proposals should be in conformance with the plan; however, if a desired use is different, the applicant will be required to submit a change (amendment) to the plan for approval. An amendment may be acceptable, provided the change for a particular reach of channel is between successive streets and approved by the local planning agency. Also, all environmental requirements will have to be fulfilled to the satisfaction of the lead agency. -2- Compatibility a. Joint use will have to provide for District's paramount right to use its right of way for flood control purposes and shall not adversely affect design, construction, operation, maintenance, or integrity of District's existing or proposed facilities. b. A facility that may affect any non -District installations shall be designed, constructed, operated, and maintained to be compatible with them. All approvals required of other agencies and parties shall be the responsibility of the applicant. District will make its records available regarding other permittees and users of its right of way. C. Public agencies needs, including, but not limited to, recreation, transportation, overbuilding for public housing, and open space, either authorized or proposed, will have to be accounted for by joint use. Recreation and transportation standards will be provided by the District for each proposal. d. Joint uses will have to comply with all State, County, and local zoning and building regulations. The District wishes to remain a "good neighbor" to the surrounding area and will not allow a use that it or the local community would find objectionable. Therefore, proposals should be aesthetically pleasing, compatible with surrounding areas, conducive to long-term use, and reflect good planning. 4. Indemnifications and Insurance Unless otherwise waived by the District, upon a showing of adequate ability to indemnify the District, all users shall furnish the District a policy of insurance coverage naming the District (and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, when applicable) as coinsured. The coverage shall indemnify the District against any loss or damage as may be required by the District but not less than $250,000/$1,000,000 for liability and $250,000 for property damage, all as further described in the lease document to be entered into by applicant. Applicant will also be required to provide a policy of fire and extended coverage insurance. The amount of the insurance will be dependent on the full replacement value of the channel cover and appurtenant structures. C. CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS Types of Overbuilding The methods introduce here serve as a general guidelines only. Each case is different and will have to be considered case by case. There are three basic methods of overbuilding (see pages 11, 12, and 13 of Section 1). Method "A" is to keep the cover above the channel as low as possible and do away with District access roads and fences. Method "B" is to keep the structure well above the top of the channel so as to allow continuous access to the channel for cleaning and maintenance of the channel, recreational trails, and transportation or utility corridors. In general, Method "A" can be used for channels less than 25 feet wide. Method "B" can be used for channels over 60 feet wide. Method "A" may be used for channels between 25 feet and 60 feet wide if it can be shown to the District's satisfaction that no special side drainage, channel maintenance, recreation, or corridor use problems exist. Method "C" is for building over underground conduits. -3- 2. Criteria for Design and Analysis of Overbuilding Plans and calculations submitted for overbuilding must be signed by a civil or structural engineer licensed to practice in the State of California. Cover systems, protective devices, and conduits shall be designed and/or analyzed based on loads and criteria consistent with the intended use of the area, but shall result in a system not less than one meeting the following requirements: a. Dead Loads: Earth Loads: Vertical and lateral loads are to be in accordance with the District's Structural Design Manual. Overburden must be shown on the drawings. Structure Loads: The loads to be used are the actual direct loads or as transmitted through earth fill as determined by a recognized method (e.g. Bousinesq). b. Live Loads: Railroad Bridges or Crossings: Cooper E Loads are to be determined by servicing or franchised railroad. Distribution of loads and impact is to be as shown in District's Structural Design Manual. Highway Bridges, Street Crossing, and Ingress and Egress Routes: HS -20 truck loading with impact in accordance with ASSHTO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges is to be used. Parking or Exterior Storage: A uniform load consistent with type of storage or parking is to be used, 100 psf minimum, plus one HS -20 truck with impact, placed at locations to provide maximum stresses. The uniform load does not have to occupy the area of the truck. Minimum truck impact shall be 10 percent of the live load. Interior Storage and Other Structures: The load shall be consistent with use as accepted by the jurisdictional Building Department. Other Areas not Normally Accessible by Vehicles or Covered by a Structure: H-15 truck with impact of at least 10 percent is to be used. C. Wide and Seismic Loads: The loads are to be as accepted by the jurisdictional Building Department. -4- d. Design Methods and Stresses: Railroad Bridges or Crossing: Design is to be in accordance with the AREA Manual for Railroad Engineering. Highway Bridges, Street Crossings, and Ingress and Egress Routes: Design is to be in accordance with the AASHTO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges. Concrete design may be either working stress or strength in accordance with American Concrete ACI 318 except that load factors for strength design shall be per AASHTO. Concrete structures maintained by the District are to be analyzed using the working stress method only. All Others: Design is to be in accordance with the AISC Manual of Steel Construction, Nation Design Specification for stress -grade lumber or ACI 318, as appropriated, nothing that concrete structures maintained by the District are to be analyzed using the working stress method. e. Foundations: Directly on drain: 1) Structure must be removable if not required for stability of the drain. 2) The storm drain must not be over -stressed by the structure. An engineering analysis of all elements of the storm drain structure must be submitted. The analysis is to be based on methods and loads shown in the District's Structural Design Manual in addition to surcharge loads due to permit work. 3) Where appropriate, a soil investigation and report will be required. Independent but Surcharge Drain (including surcharge fill): 1) Same as No. 2 above. 2) The structure must provide a minimum of 6 -inches horizontal clearance from any element of the drain, including subdrain pipes and at least 18 - inches vertical clearance from a box or pipe conduit, and 6 -inches vertical clearance from an open channel. 3) A soils engineer must analyze the foundation. Analysis is to include a soil investigation and report. Exploratory excavations must extend below foundation. Analysis must also include uplift pressures on the invert where appropriate. -5- No Effect on Drain: 1) Same as No. 2 and 3, above (independent but surcharge drain). Piles must be sleeved, as necessary; to prevent drag forces on the drain and bearing areas must be sufficiently deep so as not to produce uplift pressures. 2) The hydraulic capacity of flood control facility will have to be maintained. Normally, no construction will be allowed below the top of the channel walls if it encroaches within the design freeboard area. Types of structure for the covering will be specified to allow for standardizing the types of construction whenever possible. 3) The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is conducting a hydrologic study of various drainage areas (LACDA project). Therefore, any proposed development may have to provide for existing channels to be widened or for channel walls to be heightened. The District will provide information relative to the status and/or requirements of this study or other controls that must be met. 4) Any proposed development should provide a means for local run-off to enter the channel after said channel has been covered. Side drainage problems also should be investigated where a channel is below the surrounding ground level and existing side drains are inadequate or designed to a lesser frequency than the main channel. In these cases, interested parties will be required to do one or all of the following: (1) construct additional drainage inlets, (2) leave a section of channel uncovered, or (3) use Method "B" for overbuilding (see page 13). Channel covering usually requires that access facilities to the channel invert be constructed also. See Section D, Operational Requirements, for more information. Aesthetic Requirements Surface structures shall be constructed to be aesthetically compatible with the area and District's facilities based on current standards and economic feasibility. Landscaping or other aesthetic measures may be required to mitigate the impact of structures on its environs. D. OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS To optimize safety and ensure the hydraulic and structural integrity of a particular flood control channel, the District and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers have a number of operational requirements that must be met by every joint use proposal. The following is a list of the major requirements. Please note that this list should not be considered complete or absolute. The requirements are: Access into a covered channel is required every 500 feet. This access is usually of a pedestrian nature and could be in the form of manholes, ladders, etc. Adequate clearances inside the channel (a minimum height of channel wall) must be maintained throughout the channel for the transportation of heavy equipment used in channel repair, bridge, and bridge abutment repair, etc. In the event the channel is to be covered, adequate ventilation must be provided to prevent the build-up of noxious or volatile fumes. A short reach of the channel, 30 feet or so, to remain uncovered, thereby aiding channel maintenance and repair in that equipment and material could be lowered into or removed from the channel. E. RIGHT OF WAY AVAILABILITY Operating Right of Way a. Fee Title Generally, joint uses may be authorized on rights of way held in fee by the District. However, there may be legal encumbrances in the form of prior easements, leases, and rental agreements, which may have to be cured prior to the proposed joint use. Also, "paper streets" or unused easements for public street purposes may exist. There also may be other conditions, covenants, and restrictions to the District's title. Since perfecting title is very time-consuming, all proposals for joint use should be submitted as early as possible for right of way clearance. b. Much of the District's right of way is in the form of flood control easements. Where long reaches of fee are interspersed with short reaches of easements, it may be economically feasible to acquire the underlying fee. C. All costs attendant to perfecting title or acquiring the underlying fee will be borne by the proposed developer or public agency. Excess Right of Way District has, in addition to its operating right of way, excess property holdings, both in fee and easement. In most instances, the fee property can be incorporated into the joint use proposal. For an easement area, approval of the underlying fee owner will be required. F. OTHER REQUIREMENTS 1. Where the applicant is a private organization, after approval of the concept by the District, for fee -owned rights of way, an agreement to lease (option) will be entered into between District and applicant. This will give the applicant assurance that the right of way is available for consideration by the applicant as to duration and terms. 2. In addition to the General Provisions of District's standard permit to be issued for construction, special provisions my be required because of the nature, design, or location of proposed installation. 3. Construction must commence within six months of date of permit unless otherwise approved by Chief Engineer and be completed in accordance with an approved schedule. 4. Construction work within the channel rights of way involving removal and restoration of the channel structure, excavation, and backfill shall be accomplished during the period of April 15 to October 15. 5. As -built drawings and installation of identification markers for subsurface structures will be required by the District. Markers must not be placed so as to interfere with use of District's vehicular service roads. -7- Any relocation of survey monuments defining District's right of way boundaries will be performed by District's surveyors with the permittee underwriting the costs of such relocation. G. DOCUMENTS The District will allow overbuilding and use of air rights by a long-term lease over fee -owned property. These lease documents will provide for protection of the District's interest if nonpayment occurs, liability, etc. The leave will contain requirements that will protect the District's interest and provide for rental income. The District will monitor the lease throughout its term to ensure compliance with provisions. The term of the lease will be for a period long enough for a developer to amortize the cost of covering the channel and his construction loan, plus an additional time period (usually ten years) to obtain a return on his investment. The amortization of the cost to cover the channel may be reflected in the rent. The rent will be based on Fair Rental Value (FRV) of the property. If the appraisal approach considers channel cover as an on-site improvement, there will not be an amortization period for the cost of cover. Periodically, increases in rent based on fixed step increases or changes in the Wholesale Price Index (WPI) or periodic review of FRV, as the situation calls for, will be assessed. The lease will contain an option period to provide a developer time to complete the environmental considerations, complete the permit process, and obtain a lender. Where District has easement rights, overbuilding by the underlying fee owner can most likely be handled by permit with some type of mutually agreed upon maintenance agreement. In addition, because the District's easement for flood control purposes is, in some instances, tantamount to having the fee ownership, compensation will be required from the permittee because of the reduction in the District's use of its right of way to that of an easement for a covered drain; i.e., loss of surface use. Should the permittee be someone other than the underlying fee owner, evidence of approval of the fee owner would also be required. H. PROCEDURE TO BE FOLLOWED FOR USE OF DISTRICT'S FACILITIES BY OTHERS Prospective users must submit a written application for overbuilding or covering of open channels for proposed surface use and/or air rights use. This application should be addressed to: Los Angeles County Department of Public Works Construction Division Permits and Subdivisions Section - 8t" Floor 900 South Fremont Avenue Alhambra, CA 91803-1331 Early application, particularly for a major installation, is recommended. The following information is required: a. Six sets of preliminary drawings showing the location of the proposed covering, the desired surface use, the existing flood control facilities and stationing, and the District's right of way. b. Owner of proposed improvement. C. Preliminary construction program. d. Required time of land use. In District's review will be to determine the overall acceptability of the proposal and, if readily available, the approximate annual cost for leasing should the District's property be fee owned. If the District responds favorable to this application, a meeting will be arranged with the applicant and representatives of the District's Mapping and Property Management Division to discuss the criteria to be used for submittal of preliminary plans and general terms for leasing the District's properties and/or maintenance responsibilities. Applicant shall submit six sets of preliminary plans and design calculations, structural and hydraulic, if necessary for approval, and two copies of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (if required by an appropriate authority) when available. At this time, a deposit for the plan review will be required. The fees for checking of plans for covering of channels, including structural or hydraulic or other review as deemed necessary by the District are based on the current fee schedule adopted by the Board of Supervisors. Presently the fees are: Case I; clear span, actual cost to the District ($500 min.) and Case II; all others, actual cost to the District ($600 min.). After preliminary plans have been approved, a final submittal must be made prior to issuance of construction permit. This final submittal should contain the following: a. Four sets of final construction plans signed by a civil or structural engineer licensed to practice in California, showing proposed covering of channel. Plans should show existing improvements (both District and foreign in the construction area) and proposed improvements over proposed covering, District right of way limits, working areas, existing utilities, etc. In connection therewith, applicant will be responsible for inspecting the right of way, searching all available records, and ascertaining all foreign users of the rights of way. The District will aid in providing all its information regarding permits issued by the District. b. Inspection fees\deposits are based upon estimated actual cost determined by District; should the cost be less, the District will refund the difference. If the cost is more, applicant will submit additional amount. Upon review and approval of the final submittal, and payment of all fees, including deposit for first year's rental for leases, District will issue a construction permit. Approval of construction will be valid only to the extent of District jurisdiction. Also, the District may require a performance bond and liability insurance to protect the District's interest. 4. After the District responds favorably to this application, an Agreement to Lease (option) can be entered into between District and applicant. This commitment will be honored by the District for a period of one full year or longer, if so specified in the Agreement. At this time, the applicant will be required to deposit funds for preparation of the Agreement and the appraisal to determine the annual lease cost. These costs will be credited to applicant in the first year's rent should lease be finalized, otherwise the fees deposited will be waived. Note: In the event the applicant needs to know the cost prior to preparation of preliminary plans and finalization of the lease arrangement, applicant will be required to deposit funds for the District's cost for the work. Cost will be credited for first year's rent as stated above. Applicant may proceed with construction under terms and conditions of the permit. Construction must be initiated within one year of the date of issuance of permit unless otherwise approved by the Chief Engineer. The District will prepare the appropriate document or lease, in accordance with the terms of the Agreement previously entered into. In Upon completion of construction, one set of reproducible as -built drawings shall be submitted to the District within 180 days. In the event time warrants, one document only (lease) may be sued for the right of way negotiations. The document should be fully executed (signed by both parties) prior to submittal of final plans and before a construction permit is issued. Execution of the lease first is satisfactory with District provided applicant understands and accepts the fact that the plan review and issuance of the permit takes 30 to 60 days to complete. If there is a deadline for the applicant, the plans should include this time period. O:\Section\Permits\Flood\M aster\G U I DELI N ES -OV E R -AI RIG HTS.doc -10- I. EXAMPLES OF OVERBUILDING Pr;ction Pose flu- I ; re o Ccisson 4 TYPE OF OVERBUILDING METHap A LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Construction 07v;sicr-. -11- I ME TYPE OF OVERBUILDING MFTHQB Fricticn Pile Out ine o-;— Ca:550n LOS ANGELES COUNTY OEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Construction OiViSiOn PER41T AND SUBDIVISIONS SECTION Subcrc:n ;min] -12- Project No. Dote Preperea by P;cure: 05/02/2000 jll Fraction Piie ---* Out I i ne o4 ^-- C❑iSSQn I� TYPE OF OVERBUILDING METHOD "A" 18" M',n LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Construction D;vi5iol PEPV- ANO S,;eDIVIS[ONS SEC. -1C.% 1 1 EXIST;NG DRAIN -'-----I P-'OjeCT No -13- De Te Preocrec Dyt Attachment D Urban Freeway Cap Parks Urban Freeway Cap Parks Policy Briefing Paper Considering the Barriers and Opportunities for More Park Space in Los Angeles Project ID #103 I/ F'r c 0\, a Prepared by: Clement Lau, AICP Candidate, Doctor of Policy, Planning, and Development University of Southern California Prepared for: Los Angeles Sustainability Collaborative DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this paper and related materials are those of the author's alone, and do not reflect the opinions of the Los Angeles Sustainability Collaborative, its Board Members, or any employer thereof. The Los Angeles Sustainability Collaborative is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied in this paper, and reference herein to any specific product, process, policy, trade name, trademark, individual, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the LASC, it's Board Members, or any employer thereof. TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Executive Summary 2 1. Introduction 3 2. Problem and Background 3 3. Pros and Cons of Capping Freeways to Create Park Space 7 4. Examples of Existing Freeway Cap Parks 9 5. Current Status of Proposed Cap Parks in Los Angeles County 11 6. Implementation 15 7. Conclusion 19 References 20 Table Page 1. Total Parks and Open Space as Percentage of City Area 4 2. Children's Park Access in Seven Major Cities 5 3. Summary of Pros and Cons of Cap Parks 7 4. Examples of Cap Parks 9 5. Major Cap Park Proposals in Los Angeles County 12 Figure Page 1. Public Parks and Open Space in Los Angeles 4 2. Neighborhoods with the Greatest Need for New Parks 6 3. Freeway Park 9 4. South River Walk Park 10 5. Hance Park 10 6. Rose Kennedy Greenway 11 7. Major Cap Park Proposals in Los Angeles County 12 8. Hollywood Central Park 13 9. PARK 101 District 14 10. Cap Park at Ocean AvenueAth Street 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This policy briefing paper is the product of more than just my own efforts. Special thanks to all those who have provided valuable feedback and support: my wife Susan; Dr. David Sloane of the USC School of Policy, Planning, and Development; David Berneman and Mara Elana Burstein of the Los Angeles Sustainability Collaborative; Vaughan Davies of AECOM; Gerdo Aquino of SWA Group; Professor Andrea Hricko of the USC Keck School of Medicine; Laurie Goldman of Friends of the Hollywood Central Park; and Julie Yom. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Cap parks, also referred to as highway or deck parks, are parks built over segments of freeways that are below grade. Four major cap park proposals are currently being considered in the Los Angeles region, including the Hollywood Central Park, PARK 101 in downtown, and two smaller cap parks in Santa Monica. This policy briefing paper is intended to help policy makers, environmental advocates, and the general public to better understand cap parks, and the associated environmental and public health issues. Specifically, this paper offers a background on the shortage of public parks in the Los Angeles region, discusses the pros and cons of cap parks, studies four examples of cap parks built elsewhere, describes current cap park proposals, and addresses the barriers and constraints to implementing cap parks in the Los Angeles region. The lack of public parks in Los Angeles is an issue that demands urgent attention. Nearly two out of three children in Los Angeles County do not live within walking distance (one-quarter mile) of a park, playground or open space. These children are more likely to be obese and are at higher risk of developing asthma, diabetes, or obesity related diseases. Los Angeles needs more parks and open spaces to meet the recreation and public health needs of its residents, especially children. Capping segments of freeways to create park space is one way to address the shortage of parks in the region. Like any proposed solution to a problem, the idea of cap parks has both pros and cons. Capping segments of freeways is a good way to create large new parks in urban areas where vacant land is scarce. By building on unused space over freeways, creation of cap parks will not displace residences or businesses and can reconnect neighborhoods or communities divided by freeways. Large cap parks have the potential to generate economic benefits, including enhanced values to adjacent properties, attraction of businesses and visitors, and creation of new jobs. Political and business leaders are particularly eager to advocate for and support visions of large new parks. Los Angeles has the benefit of learning from the experiences of other cities where cap parks have been built. The four examples studied in this paper offer insights as to the potential benefits and challenges with the implementation of cap park projects of varying sizes at diverse locations. Construction costs will be high for new cap parks, especially large ones. Operation and maintenance costs will also be significant for large cap parks given their size and amenities. Time and process required for cap park development will be lengthy and complicated. Feasibility, environmental, economic, and other studies must be completed before actual construction begins. In addition, cap parks may expose park users to potential health risks related to air quality and noise. However, these impacts could be addressed through innovative park design and other mitigation measures. As land has become increasingly scarce in Los Angeles, we need creative and resourceful planning solutions to meet the park and recreational needs of the population. Cap parks offer hope and benefits that simply cannot be ignored. In particular, larger cap parks have the potential to: improve regional air quality; help reduce obesity and its associated problems; create short- and long-term jobs; raise adjacent property values; and enhance the overall quality of life. While they can be costly and complex projects that are challenging to implement, cap parks represent a strategy that must be seriously considered to promote sustainability, address the need for more parkland, and reconnect neighborhoods that have been fragmented as a result of freeway construction. 2 1. INTRODUCTION Cap parks, also referred to as highway or deck parks, are parks built over segments of freeways that are below grade. Four major cap park proposals are currently being considered in the Los Angeles region, including the Hollywood Central Park, PARK 101 in downtown, and two smaller cap parks in Santa Monica. This policy briefing paper is intended to help policy makers, environmental advocates, and the general public to better understand cap parks, and the associated environmental and public health issues. Specifically, this paper offers a background on the shortage of public parks in the Los Angeles region (Section 2), discusses the pros and cons of cap parks (Section 3), studies four examples of cap parks built elsewhere (Section 4), describes current cap park proposals (Section 5), and addresses the barriers and constraints to implementing cap parks in the Los Angeles region (Section 6). 2. PROBLEM AND BACKGROUND Problem The lack of public parks in Los Angeles is an issue that demands urgent attention. Nearly two out of three children in Los Angeles County do not live within walking distance (one-quarter mile) of a park, playground or open space.' These children are more likely to be obese and are at higher risk of developing asthma, diabetes, or obesity related disease.2 Los Angeles needs more parks and open spaces to meet the recreation and public health needs of its residents, especially children. Capping segments of freeways to create park space is one way to address the shortage of parks in the region and is the focus of this paper. Background In 1930, the firm Olmsted Brothers and Bartholomew & Associates submitted a report titled "Parks, Playgrounds, and Beaches in the Los Angeles Region" to the Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce.3 The report proposed a comprehensive and coherent network of parks, playgrounds, schools, beaches, forests, and transportation to promote the social, economic, and environmental vitality of Los Angeles and the health of its residents. The Olmsted -Bartholomew Plan was a model of visionary and bold planning commissioned at a time when land was available and the region's population was growing tremendously. However, the plan was never adopted and only segments of the report have been implemented to date due to a variety of political, economic, and financial reasons. Today, Los Angeles is one of the most park -poor cities in the United States. With only 10 percent of its total area devoted to parks and open space, Los Angeles lags behind all other major cities on the west coast (see Table 1) and ranks below New York and Philadelphia nationally. In addition, parks and open spaces are distributed unevenly in the region, with a significant portion of parkland located away from the urban core and underserved communities (see Figure 1). Griffith Park, for example, has an area of over 4,000 acres, but does not provide for the active recreation elements ' Trust for Public Land. (2004, November). No place to play: a comparative analysis of park access in seven major cities, p. 4. 2 Los Angeles County Department of Public Health (2007, October). Preventing childhood obesity: the need to create healthy places, p. 5. 3 Hise, G. & Deverell, W. (2000). Eden by Design: the 1930 Olmsted -Bartholomew Plan for the Los Angeles Region, p. 1. 3 typically available in an urban park.4 The park consists primarily of rugged hillsides and mountains, and is difficult to reach without a car. Table 1: Total Parks and Open Space as Percentage of City Area City City Area (in acres) Total Parks/Open Space (in acres) Park/Open Space as Percentage of City Area Los Angeles 300,352 30,121 10.0% Seattle 53,696 6,194 11.5% Portland 79,808 12,591 15.8% San Diego 207,360 36,108 17.4% San Francisco 29,888 7,594 25.4% Source: Harnik. 2000. Figure 1: Public Parks and Open Space in Los Angeles JUUIUC. I IUSI IUI r-UUIIU LdIIU, LUV'+. Another indicator of park needs in a community is access as measured by the percentage of children within walking distance or one-quarter mile of a park.5 Los Angeles offers its children the 4 Active recreation requires constructed facilities such as basketball courts and fields for soccer and football. M worst access to parks among the seven major cities evaluated.6 As shown in Table 2 below, only one-third of the city's children live within walking distance of a park. Table 2: Children's Park Access in Seven Major Cities City Percentage of children within one-quarter mile of a park Number of children not within one-quarter mile of a park Los Angeles Los Angeles County 33% 36% 657,700 1,694,400 Dallas 42% 182,800 San Diego 65% 102,300 Seattle 79% 18,600 San Francisco 85% 16,700 New York 91% 178,500 Boston 97% 2,900 Source: Trust for Public Land, 2004. Access to and availability of public facilities for physical activity, such as parks and playgrounds, has an important role in the prevention and treatment of obesity. Research shows that when people have access to parks, they are more likely to exercise, which can reduce obesity and its associated health risks and costs.' A number of studies reviewed in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine showed that "creation of or enhanced access to places for physical activity combined with informational outreach" produced a 48 percent increase in the frequency of physical activity.$ These studies also found that easy access to a place to exercise resulted in a five percent median increase in aerobic capacity, along with weight loss, a reduction in body fat, and improvements in flexibility.9 There are unfair park and health disparities in Los Angeles based on ethnicity, income, and access to cars.10 Children of color disproportionately live in communities of concentrated poverty without enough parks and playgrounds to play in, and do not have the means to reach parks in other neighborhoods. Figure 2 identifies neighborhoods in Los Angeles with the greatest need for new parks. These neighborhoods have high concentrations of residents under the age of 18 and have 5 Most cities and counties rely on National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA) standards to determine whether they have enough parks. These standards are expressed in terms of acres per 1,000 residents. While these standards are helpful as general measures of parkland availability, they were established decades earlier and do not accurately reflect the environment and variety of communities today. NRPA standards, for example, do not address access nor do they include many types of open space common in urban environments such as greenbelts and trails. In addition, these standards are silent on the issue of equity; the same standards are used regardless of whether a community is currently park -poor or park -rich. 6 Trust for Public Land. (2004, November). No place to play: a comparative analysis of park access in seven major cities, p. 6. Gies, E. (2006). The Health Benefits of Parks, p. 8. 8 Kahn, E. et al (2002). The Effectiveness of Interventions to Increase Physical Activity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, pp. 87-88. s Ibid. 10 Garcia, R. & White, A. (2006). Healthy Parks, Schools, and Communities: Mapping Green Access and Equity for Los Angeles Region, p. 3. W1 limited or no parks within walking distance. The health implications of the lack of physical activity are significant. Children in underserved communities are much more likely to suffer from obesity, diabetes, and other diseases related to inactivity.11 Garcia and White (2006) even declared that "this is the first generation in the history of this country in which children will have a lower life expectancy than their parents if present trends continue" (p. 3). Figure 2: Neighborhoods with the Greatest Need for New Parks Source: Trust for Public Land, 2004. Fortunately, a coalition of community-based environmental and social justice groups has emerged recently to lead efforts to address inequities in the provision of parks in the Los Angeles area.12 This coalition is trying to revive the Olmsted -Bartholomew vision and has experienced some success along the Los Angeles River and at nearby lands that were previously slated for non -park 11 Los Angeles County Department of Public Health (2007, October). Preventing childhood obesity: the need to create healthy places, p. 5. 12 This coalition was led by The City Project (formerly of the Center for Law in the Public Interest) and included (but not limited to): Friends of the Los Angeles River, Concerned Citizens of South Central Los Angeles, and the Catholic Archdiocese of Los Angeles. [e development. Specific examples include the Cornfield near Chinatown and Taylor Yard, both of which have been developed with State parks serving inner city residents. 13 In addition, the business community as well as planning and design professionals have advocated for large new urban cap parks in Los Angeles. One proposal is the "PARK 101" idea which calls for a new 100 -acre park district in downtown Los Angeles. 14 Another is the proposed 44 -acre Hollywood Central Park which has the support of the Hollywood Chamber of Commerce and numerous political leaders.15 Proponents of both proposals believe that the parks would offer economic benefits in addition to addressing the park deficit in Los Angeles, including: enhancing real estate values, attracting tourists and businesses, and creating jobs. Prominent park researcher Dr. John L. Crompton (2001) has demonstrated through his studies that the economic values of parks can be measured and their economic benefits can be realized through appropriate design, siting, maintenance, and marketing. 16 3. PROS AND CONS OF CAPPING FREEWAYS TO CREATE PARK SPACE Cap parks, also referred to as highway or deck parks, are parks built over segments of freeways that are below grade. Like any proposed solution to a problem, the idea of cap parks has both pros and cons as discussed below. Table 3: Summary of Pros and Cons of Cap Parks Pros Capping segments of freeways is a good way to create large new parks in urban areas where vacant land is scarce. It is very difficult, if not impossible, to acquire and assemble several acres of land in densely populated areas to create new parks. Major challenges include the high cost of land acquisition and community opposition, especially when displacement of residences and/or 13 More information regarding the Cornfield and Taylor Yard are provided in Arnold (2007)'s Fair and Healthy Land Use: Environmental Justice and Planning, pp. 112-113. 14 Davies, V. (2008, August). A "Central Park" for Los Angeles? Urban Land, 67(8), pp. 42-45. About 16 acres of the park district would be a cap over the 101 Freeway. 15 Hollywood Chamber of Commerce. (2007). Fact Sheet: Hollywood Freeway Central Park. 16 Crompton, J.L. (2001). Parks and economic development. Pros Cons ✓ Create large new parks in park -poor urban x Construction, operation, and maintenance areas costs are high for large cap parks ✓ Reconnect neighborhoods divided by freeways X Time and process required for park ✓ Enhance adjacent property values development will be lengthy ✓ Attract businesses and visitors X Only one or two large cap parks will likely be ✓ Create direct and indirect jobs pursued at a time due to costs and complexity of these projects ✓ Large park proposals appeal to a much x May expose park users to: 1) potential broader audience than smaller projects health risks related to air quality and noise; ✓ Build on successes of cap parks developed and 2) potential safety risks since pedestrian elsewhere access to cap parks may be dangerous X Cap parks may be taken over by the homeless Pros Capping segments of freeways is a good way to create large new parks in urban areas where vacant land is scarce. It is very difficult, if not impossible, to acquire and assemble several acres of land in densely populated areas to create new parks. Major challenges include the high cost of land acquisition and community opposition, especially when displacement of residences and/or 13 More information regarding the Cornfield and Taylor Yard are provided in Arnold (2007)'s Fair and Healthy Land Use: Environmental Justice and Planning, pp. 112-113. 14 Davies, V. (2008, August). A "Central Park" for Los Angeles? Urban Land, 67(8), pp. 42-45. About 16 acres of the park district would be a cap over the 101 Freeway. 15 Hollywood Chamber of Commerce. (2007). Fact Sheet: Hollywood Freeway Central Park. 16 Crompton, J.L. (2001). Parks and economic development. businesses is necessary. Cap parks provide a viable and superior alternative because the land or space above the freeway may be free, made available as air rights by the agency responsible for the freeway. By building on unused space over freeways, creation of cap parks will also not displace residences or businesses and can reconnect neighborhoods or communities divided by freeways. Large cap parks have the potential to generate economic benefits, including enhanced values to adjacent properties, attraction of businesses and visitors, and creation of new jobs. An example is Hance Park in Phoenix which is surrounded by a growing number of upscale condominium towers. Large park proposals also appeal to a much broader audience than smaller projects. Political and business leaders are particularly eager to advocate for and support visions of large new parks. Such parks would not only meet recreational needs, but also help to upgrade or improve the image of cities. Millennium Park, for example, has elevated the status of Chicago and may be considered to be the city's most important project since the World's Columbian Exposition of 1893." Los Angeles has the benefit of learning from the experiences of other cities where cap parks have been built. The four examples studied in this paper offer insights as to the potential benefits and challenges with the implementation of cap park projects of varying sizes at diverse locations. Cons Construction costs are high for cap parks, especially large ones. The State of New Jersey, for example, spent $150 million on the 6.5 -acre South River Walk Park. Not surprisingly, the proposed 44 -acre Hollywood Central Park has a price tag of nearly $1 billion. Operation and maintenance costs will also be significant for large cap parks given their size and amenities. Time and process required for cap park development will be lengthy. Feasibility, environmental, economic, and other studies must be completed before actual construction begins. During the construction phase, delays can also occur, as evidenced by Boston's now infamous "Big Dig" project also known as the Rose Kennedy Greenway. In addition, only one large cap park will likely be pursued at a time in a region due to the costs and complexity of these projects. It is unclear, for instance, whether the Hollywood Central Park and PARK 101 can occur simultaneously as both will impact traffic on the 101 Freeway. Cap parks may expose park users to potential health risks related to air quality and noise. Studies have shown both the adverse health impacts of living in close proximity to freeways and of driving in long tunnels due to exposure to poor air quality.'$ Also, noise is an issue of concern, especially in smaller cap parks. In addition, potential safety risks exist if access to cap parks is not properly designed to protect pedestrians from vehicular traffic around the parks. Like any park, cap parks may be subject to problems relating to crime and homelessness, if not properly managed and improved over time. For example, at one point Seattle's Freeway Park fell into disuse, resulting in the park becoming a place where crime occurred regularly and where the homeless took over. "The 24.5 -acre Millennium Park is not a freeway cap park, but is similar in that covers land previously occupied by rail yards and parking lots. Please visit http://www.miIlenniumpark.org/parkhistory/ for more information. 18 Please refer to sources cited later on page 18 of this policy paper. E:3 4. EXAMPLES OF EXISTING FREEWAY CAP PARKS A 2007 Trust for Public Land (TPL) study found that there are over 20 cap parks in the United States and at least a dozen more in various stages of planning.19 The average size of the country's cap parks is nine acres and each covers an average of 1,620 linear feet of highway. Summarized in Table 4 and described below are four examples of completed cap parks. Table 4: Examples of Cap Parks Park Name Freeway Park South River Walk Park Hance Park Rose Kennedy Greenway Location Seattle, WA Trenton, NJ Phoenix, AZ Boston, MA Tunnel Length (linear feet) 528 898 2,640 5,280 Park Size (acres) 5.2 6.5 10.0 30.0 Highway 1-5 U.S. 29 1-10 1-93 Source: Harnik, 2010. Freeway Park (5.2 acres) Seattle, Washington Seattle's Freeway Park was created to draw together city neighborhoods divided by Interstate 5.20 When Freeway Park was completed in 1976, it was hailed as a major architectural and engineering accomplishment. Designed by the world-renowned firm of Lawrence Halprin & Associates, it was the first park to be constructed over a freeway. The idea for a downtown park over the freeway is as old as the Seattle segment of Interstate 5 itself. In 1966 civic - minded individuals and the city, county, and state officials were already talking about constructing a cap over the below -grade portion separating First Hill from downtown. The park was developed with bond money, as well as county, state and federal funding. Figure 3: Freeway Park Freeway Park is intended to provide a gathering Source: http://www.bing.com/maps/ place for residents, shoppers, downtown office workers, hotel visitors, and the rest of the downtown population. Initially, the park was actively programmed with lunchtime and evening concerts. Over the years, however, as programming became more limited, the park fell into disuse. As the vegetation matured and cut sightlines, the park became darker, more difficult to navigate, and even dangerous. Seattle's growing drug -using 19 Harnik, P. & Welle, B. (2007, April). Nature over traffic. Urban Land, 66(4), p. 102; Harnik, P. (2010). Urban Green: Innovative Parks for Resurgent Cities, pp. 136-137. Other examples of cap parks not covered in this policy paper include: Riverwalk Plaza (Hartford, CT); Memorial Park (La Canada Flintridge, CA); Lytle Park (Cincinnati, OH); Waterside Park (Atlantic City, NJ); Gateway Park (Arlington, VA); Mid -City Bridge Park Deck (San Diego, CA); Capitol Reflecting Pool (Washington, D.C.); 1-95 Park & Memorial Parks (two parks in Philadelphia, PA); Carl Schurz Park (New York); Sam Smith Park (Seattle, WA); and Rose Garden, Lake Place, Cooke Plaza (3 parks in Duluth, MN). 20 http://www.cityofseattle.net/parks/park_detai1.asp?ID=312 17 and drug -selling population, as well as its homeless population, also found a home in Freeway Park. Various physical and other improvements have been made to address these problems. Today, the park is in better shape and well -used by office workers during the day. Acoustics is an issue at Freeway Park. Due in part to its relatively small size (5.2 acres), park users are subject to a constant white noise caused by traffic. While the sound is not obtrusive, it is not minimal either.21 South River Walk Park (6.5 acres) Trenton, New Jersey South River Walk Park is located above the Route 29 tunnel and was gifted to the Mercer County Park Commission in 2004 by the State of New Jersey. 22 The 6.5 -acre park focuses on the history of Trenton and its connection to the Delaware River. The park is home to five arches of materials which represent various eras of the city from pre -revolutionary through the Industrial Revolution to the modern era. The park has hosted many festivals and art fairs as well as weddings, walk-a- thons and family events. The State of New Jersey spent $150 million on the South River Walk Park. According to Trenton Planning Director Andrew Carten, "The project resulted in a significant Figure 4: South River Walk Park spike in interest and sale prices of property. After all, Source: http://www.binq.com/maps/ would you rather look over 600 trucks barreling past every day, or a scenic park and river?" One lot with a value of $120,000 prior to park construction was developed with six housing units that sold for $200,000 each. The park also helped attract a new 82 -unit market -rate residential development.23 Figure 5: Hance Park Hance Park (10 acres) Phoenix, Arizona Opened in 1992, the Margaret T Hance Park is located in central Phoenix. The park is built on top of the 1-10 tunnel and is named after Margaret T. Hance, former mayor of Phoenix. The park is home to the a Japanese Tea House and Friendship --� Garden, the Irish Cultural Center, and _ 1T the annual St. Patrick's Day Irish Family Faire. i Source: http://www.bing.com/maps/ 21 Harnik, P. (2010). Urban Green: Innovative Parks for Resurgent Cities, p. 138. 22 http://www.state.nj.us/counties/mercer/commissions/park/miIlyard.htm1 23 Harnik, P. (2010). Urban Green: Innovative Parks for Resurgent Cities, p. 139. 24 http://phoenix.about.com/library/blmaphancedeckpark.htm 10 At ten acres, Hance Park is not as impacted by noise or acoustic issues as Seattle's Freeway Park. Labeled by the Phoenix New Times "a rare Phoenix instance of nature over traffic—in this case, literally," Hance Park is decked over the Papago Freeway, uniting uptown and downtown and providing a park next to the central library. The freeway was originally planned as an elevated bridge through downtown, but community opposition killed that idea in a 1973 ballot measure. It was not until ten years later that the city finally accepted a below -grade solution with the park as a key added amenity. As a sign of its success, the park has spurred efforts to revitalize the surrounding downtown area, including construction of market rate and affordable housing and the expansion and/or renovation of local museums.25 Rose Kennedy Greenway (30 acres) Boston, Massachusetts Opened in 2008, the Rose Kennedy Greenway is a roughly 1.5 -mile -long series of parks and public spaces created in downtown Boston.26 It is the final part of the massive Central Artery/Tunnel Project (CA/T) or Big Dig that put 1-93 underground and removed the elevated freeway that served as the main highway through downtown for more than 40 years. The Greenway was named in honor of Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy and officially dedicated in 2004. Officials originally predicted a 2005 completion date for the park components of the Greenway. However, due to numerous delays, cost overruns, and the Big Dig ceiling collapse, the parks were not completed until 2007. As the Greenway runs above an interstate highway, the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority retains Figure 6: Rose Kennedy Greenway ownership of most of the land. The non-profit Rose Source: http://www.bing.com/maps/ Fitzgerald Kennedy Greenway Conservancy has been created jointly by the Turnpike Authority, the City of Boston, and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts to oversee maintenance, fundraising, and programming of the Greenway parks. The $14 -billion price tag of the CA/T has caused some people to question the financial feasibility of cap parks. However, it should be noted that this was primarily a transportation project and included major bridges and underwater tunnels. About $40 million (of the $14 billion) was actually spent on the mile -long stretch of the four parks that make up the Greenway.27 5. CURRENT STATUS OF PROPOSED CAP PARKS IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY Civic and business leaders, planners, and architects have proposed several cap parks in Los Angeles County. Los Angeles seems ideal for new cap parks. Its extensive network of freeways, including numerous below -grade segments, translates to various locations that may be capped with new parks. The region's four major cap park proposals are summarized in Table 5. 25 AECOM. (2010, August). PARK 101 District Feasibility Study, p. 4-8. 26 http://www.rosekennedygreenway.org/ 27 Harnik, P. (2010). Urban Green: Innovative Parks for Resurgent Cities, pp. 139-140. 11 + � o 4A R o. -9 tiR �, 16,71- �:� -7rt • - ` � - ?.. - � a -,, Vk - ra+p .6... t + o-", ownership of most of the land. The non-profit Rose Source: http://www.bing.com/maps/ Fitzgerald Kennedy Greenway Conservancy has been created jointly by the Turnpike Authority, the City of Boston, and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts to oversee maintenance, fundraising, and programming of the Greenway parks. The $14 -billion price tag of the CA/T has caused some people to question the financial feasibility of cap parks. However, it should be noted that this was primarily a transportation project and included major bridges and underwater tunnels. About $40 million (of the $14 billion) was actually spent on the mile -long stretch of the four parks that make up the Greenway.27 5. CURRENT STATUS OF PROPOSED CAP PARKS IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY Civic and business leaders, planners, and architects have proposed several cap parks in Los Angeles County. Los Angeles seems ideal for new cap parks. Its extensive network of freeways, including numerous below -grade segments, translates to various locations that may be capped with new parks. The region's four major cap park proposals are summarized in Table 5. 25 AECOM. (2010, August). PARK 101 District Feasibility Study, p. 4-8. 26 http://www.rosekennedygreenway.org/ 27 Harnik, P. (2010). Urban Green: Innovative Parks for Resurgent Cities, pp. 139-140. 11 Table 5: Major Cap Park Proposals in Los Angeles County Cap Park Proposal Hollywood Central PARK 101 Santa Monica Cap Parks Park Location/Freeway Hollywood Downtown L.A. Santa Monica Santa Monica Above the 101 Freeway Above the 101 Freeway, Above the 10 Above the 10 between Sunset & between Union Station and Freeway, Freeway, Hollywood Boulevard Grand Avenue between between 14th Ocean Avenue & 17th Streets & 4th Street Park Size 44 acres 16 acres above freeway; 5 acres 7 acres 100 acres total Total Cost $950 million $328 million for the cap above $87 million To be freeway determined Sources: AECOM, 2010; V. Davies, 2010; City of Santa Monica, 2010. Figure 7 identifies the location of the proposed cap parks in relation to those neighborhoods with limited access to parks or other open space as identified by the Trust for Public Land. Figure 7: Major Cap Park Proposals in Los Angeles County r � - Hollywood Ic Central Park t _ } Is k •� . x,71 _ _ if Ij I� s t4i� Santa Monica Cap Parks 1 _ sr - -7 kY Sources: Trust for Public Land, 2004; AECOM, 2010; City of Santa Monica, 2010. 12 Hollywood Central Park The Hollywood Central Park proposal is the construction of a cap over the U.S. 101 Freeway, between Hollywood and Santa Monica Boulevards, as the freeway travels below grade through the heart of Hollywood. By capping a portion of the Hollywood Freeway, this project will create a much-needed street -level 44 -acre public park in one of the lowest resident -to -park space communities in California. Hollywood has 0.005 acres of open space per resident as compared to 0.012 acres within the City of Los Angeles. In addition, the project would reunite diverse communities and dense neighborhoods, separated for more than 50 years, by the Hollywood Freeway. Figure 8: Hollywood Central Park Source: http://www.hollywoodfreewaycentralpark.org/ At 44 acres, the park is a large project with the potential to strengthen the economy through job creation, increased tourism, and enhanced property values around the park. The park would also encourage participation in physical exercise and provide green open space and recreational facilities to more than 40,000 children, a majority of who live in apartments. From a traffic engineering standpoint, the project would also be desirable because it would: make long -needed ramp improvements; streamline freeway functioning; and improve freeway overpasses. Of the four cap park proposals in Los Angeles County, the Hollywood Central Park is the furthest along; AECOM completed a feasibility study for this project in 2008. The Friends of Hollywood Central Park has been very active in its efforts to make the park a reality, including lobbying political leaders at all levels, raising support and funds, and coordinating with Caltrans on the required environmental impact studies. The group has even retained a consultant to provide a preliminary study on the Hollywood Central Park's potential return on investment. PARK 101 PARK 101 was initially the vision of a group of college students from around the world who participated in EDAW Inc.'s Intern Program in June 2008.28 The interns were asked this question: "How can we reconnect the City's historic core north of the Hollywood Freeway with the civic, cultural and financial centers to the south?" Their solution, PARK 101, is a vision for a 100 -acre urban park district serving downtown and adjacent neighborhoods such as Chinatown and Little Tokyo, all of which lack adequate open space. It would involve building a 16 -acre cap above a portion of the Hollywood Freeway and its exit ramps. This proposal would also incorporate nearby parking lots and underused land next to the freeway, and reconfigure the Civic Center area— converting an eyesore into an urban park and a walkable, vibrant neighborhood. This project provides a unique opportunity to shape a new direction for downtown. Focused on a relatively small area straddling the 101 Freeway and situated in an existing maze of roadways, 28 EDAW is now a part of AECOM (http://www.aecom.com/), an international provider of professional technical and management support services to a broad range of markets, including transportation, facilities, environmental, energy, water and government. 13 PARK 101 can remake Los Angeles into a more sustainable and livable city. According to AECOM, the PARK 101 proposal focuses on six design principles: maximizing regional connectivity; developing a pedestrian focus; providing flexibility of open space; reconnecting communities; being a regenerative tool; and creating a "Wow" factor. PARK 101 is not just a cap over a Figure 9: PARK 101 District freeway. Proponents of PARK 101 envision a new park district that mends the fragmentation of the City's central core. The design of the park is based on the extension and intersection of disconnected street grids on both sides of the freeway, as well as the opportunities inherent at Union Station and its future high speed rail component. The points of intersections and the axial vistas connecting key landmarks such as the Cathedral of Our Lady of the Angels, Union Station, and the Los Angeles River generate a series of links that create shapes for different programmatic components, and create the alignments and forms that give shape to the park. Source: AECOM, 2010. The vision of PARK 101 will be very costly to realize: $328 million for the cap park portion alone.29 However, the project will be built in five phases and will offer adjacent "value creation opportunities" in the form of new real estate developments that create value where it does not currently exist. A feasibility study by AECOM indicates that every dollar of the public investment in PARK 101 would spur $1.25 in new private development, which is not otherwise likely to occur.so Anticipated new development in the Park sub -district includes an estimated 1.0 to 1.9 million square feet of hotel, office, and retail space and 600 to 800 new residential units worth an additional $490 million. In addition to 2,800 to 3,500 one-time construction jobs, the PARK 101 district is expected to create 2,800 to 6,000 new permanent jobs. Santa Monica Cap Parks The City of Santa Monica is proposing to cap two portions of the 10 Freeway: between Ocean Avenue and 4th Street and between 14th and 17th Streets. The first project would tie together Main Street with downtown Santa Monica, while the second would function as a green space near 14th and 17th Streets. According to city staff, momentum is building for both projects. 29 According to AECOM (2010), the total estimated cost of the infrastructure investment for the PARK 101 district is approximately $825 million, and is distributed among the three sub -areas: $385 million for the Park Sub -District (includes the cap park component); $300 million for the Station Sub -District; and $135 million for the River Sub -District. s0 AECOM. (2010, August). PARK 101 District Feasibility Study, p. 1-11. 14 Between Ocean Avenue and 4th Street: As part of the city's implementation of the Civic Center Specific Plan, this capping project would extend the McClure Tunnel and cover the 10 Freeway from 4th Street to Ocean Avenue, offering an enlarged green space for outdoor enjoyment. The five - acre freeway cap would improve connection between downtown Santa Monica and the Civic Center. Specifically, the cap would improve public access to the new Palisades Garden Walk and Town Square Project. With an Expo Line light rail station at Colorado Avenue and 4th Street scheduled to be completed by 2015, the project could also enhance walkability by providing a pedestrian connection between Third Street Promenade, Santa Monica Place, and Main Street. A preliminary study indicates that the project would cost about $87 million. AECOM is currently completing a full feasibility study for this project.31 Figure 10: Cap Park at Ocean Avenue/4th Street Sources: City of Santa Monica, 2010; The LookOut news, 2010. Between 14th and 17th Streets: This seven -acre cap park is envisioned as an opportunity to expand open space, explore joint development, and reconnect neighborhoods that were broken by the construction of the freeway. This park would also be located near the future Expo Line station at Memorial Park, which is located on Olympic Boulevard between 14" and 16th Streets, just north of the freeway. The proposed park would reconnect the Pico neighborhood to the larger city fabric. The City received $250,000 in grant money from Caltrans to complete a feasibility study for this cap project. This study is one component of planning for the area which will include the Memorial Park Master Plan, the Expo light rail station area planning, and a future specific plan for the district as proposed in the city's Land Use and Circulation Element. 6. IMPLEMENTATION Funding Construction costs for large cap parks can be very high, as evidenced by the expected price tag of the Hollywood Central Park. Some may argue that numerous existing parks may be improved or upgraded using $950 million - the estimated cost of creating the Hollywood Central Park (not including any land acquisition costs). However, the land or space above the freeway may be free, made available as air rights by Caltrans. This can translate to a multimillion -dollar gift in urban locations. For example, land costs approximately $2 million to $3 million per acre near the Santa Ana Freeway by the Los Angeles City Hall.32 There would be no land costs if Caltrans agrees to 31 The City Council and Redevelopment Agency authorized the execution of a reimbursement agreement, in an amount not to exceed $3,156,508, using redevelopment funds to pay for costs associated with the freeway capping feasibility study, including engineering and constructability analysis, and the preparation of options for connecting the Civic Center and downtown over the freeway. 32 Harnik, P. & Welle, B. (2007, April). Nature over traffic. Urban Land, 66(4), p. 103. 15 make air rights above freeways available. This is not unlikely considering that Caltrans has identified itself as a key stakeholder involved in making PARK 101 a reality.33 In addition, there are various sources of local, state, and federal funds that can be obtained, particularly if an economic analysis shows that associated development will generate significantly more tax revenue. One approach is to create a tax increment financing district, whereby future increased tax revenue is used to pay back the costs of the park. The PARK 101 proposal, for example, is expected to offer adjacent "value creation opportunities" in the form of new real estate developments: the project is expected to spur $1.25 in new private development for every dollar of public investment. The project may also receive funding created to mitigate impacts related to the future development of high speed rail. Other local funding sources include public works capital funds or municipal bonds. The federal or state government often pays for the deck superstructure, while the city finances the actual park development. For example, the Trenton deck for the South River Walk Park came about through reconstruction of a state highway and was paid for by the State of New Jersey.34 Construction of large cap parks must be done in phases, as proposed for both the Hollywood Central Park and PARK 101. Incremental development allows park developers to build on early successes and to secure funding over a longer period of time. This approach also minimizes disruption to traffic and circulation during the construction period. Another aspect of funding is the cost of operating and maintaining the parks. While local parks and recreation departments are typically responsible for operation and maintenance, it would be beneficial to create a non-profit management organization for each large cap park. For instance, the non-profit Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy Greenway Conservancy was created to oversee maintenance, fundraising, and programming of the Greenway parks. Stakeholder Engagement The development of cap parks involves and affects a broad range of stakeholders: Residents in Underserved These residents live in communities without sufficient places to recreate and Communities, especially do not have the means to reach parks and school fields in other Children neighborhoods. They are the intended beneficiaries of strategies to increase the supply of parks in underserved neighborhoods. Business Interests Business interests support large urban parks with the potential to generate economic benefits: enhancing real estate values, attracting tourists and businesses, and creating jobs. For example, the Hollywood Chamber of Commerce is the key proponent of the Hollywood Central Park. Transportation Officials Transportation officials play a critical role in the development of cap parks because these parks would be developed above segments of freeways under their control. Caltrans is a key partner in all four cap park proposals. Local and State Politicians Local and state political representatives play a key role by advocating for new parks and securing funding for their development. For example, city, county, and state officials worked together to create Vista Hermosa Park, downtown's first new public park in many years .35 To be implemented, any new strategy to create new parks requires the backing of political leaders. 33 http://www.dot.ca.gov/dist07/travel/projects/park101/ 34 Harnik, P. (2010). Urban Green: Innovative Parks for Resurgent Cities, p. 141. 35 Vista Hermosa Park was built on a brownfield in downtown Los Angeles by the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy and the Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority in a joint -use partnership with LAUSD and the City of Los Angeles. The 10.5 -acre park restores some of the natural topography and native 16 Environmental Justice Environmental justice groups are the leaders of the urban parks movement in Groups Los Angeles. They seek to eliminate unfair park, school, and health disparities based on race, ethnicity, poverty, youth, and access to cars. These groups contributed significantly to the development of new parks at the Cornfield and Taylor Yard. Public Health Officials Public health officials generally support the development of new parks because they provide opportunities for physical activity, especially for children. However, public health experts must evaluate the potential health concerns of placing new parks at locations such as above freeways. Local Parks and Local parks and recreation departments provide parks and recreation Recreation Departments services, and will most likely be responsible for the operation and maintenance of any new cap parks, unless new non -profits are created for such purposes. State Parks Department State Parks helped make the new parks at the Cornfield and Taylor Yard and Conservancies possible. The Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy and the Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority contributed to the development of Vista Hermosa Park. All three will continue to partner with local agencies to provide new urban parks. Conservation and These groups support projects that protect and restore the natural Environmental Groups environment. For example, Friends of the Los Angeles River seeks to restore the river's natural habitat and develop bikeways, paths, and trails on the riverbanks. They typically favor passive recreational activities such as hiking, bird watching and nature study. Proper engagement of and cooperation between these stakeholders are critical to the success of the proposed cap parks. It is important to ensure that stakeholders understand the goals and anticipated benefits associated with the proposed parks. There are various forms of engagement and communication, including the community dialogue, news media, and simulation tools, which can provide a better understanding of the proposals, and demonstrate how the parks could impact quality of life and social equity. Political Will and Support Without political will and support, the proposed cap parks would be great ideas left unimplemented. Fortunately, all four projects have their fair share of supporters. The Friends of Hollywood Central Park, for example, has done an outstanding job of outreach and education, as evidenced by the long list of politicians supporting the project.36 PARK 101 is well -supported by public agencies37 and is described briefly in the Central City Community Plan, an official planning document prepared by the Los Angeles City Planning Department. However, the project will require more open and vocal support from one or more political champions to move forward, especially to work with Caltrans to streamline its review and permitting processes. As smaller projects, the Santa Monica cap parks do not require the same level of political support as the Hollywood and PARK vegetation of the area and features trails, streams, meadows, oak savannahs, picnic areas, art elements, an environmentally -themed children's adventure area, and a 120 -student capacity outdoor amphitheater. Built with state-of-the-art "green" technologies, the park enhances environmental and natural history educational opportunities for the adjacent high school, and provides a regulation soccer field for shared use by the school and the community. 36 Politicians include: Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, City Council members Eric Garcetti and Tom LaBonge, Congressman Xavier Becerra, Congresswoman Diane Watson, former State Senator and current County Supervisor Mark Ridley-Thomas, and California Assemblyman Mike Feuer. 37 Including Metro, SCAG, Caltrans, and CRA/LA. 17 101 proposals. Nevertheless, the two parks have received the blessing of city leaders who committed funding to study their feasibility. As of this writing, there are no vocal opponents to the four proposals. Understandably, some may be concerned about the high costs of cap parks and commuters may be uneasy about being stuck in tunnels for lengthy periods during traffic jams.38 Environmental and Public Health Impacts The environmental and public health impacts of the cap park proposals have not yet been comprehensively evaluated as required by California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Unfortunately, the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health also has not conducted any research on the potential public health impacts of cap parks .39 Nevertheless, it is logical to consider that because of their location, the proposed cap parks may expose future park users to potential health threats related to traffic noise and poor air quality. Excessive traffic noise could be an issue, especially for the smaller cap parks proposed in Santa Monica. These parks are similar in size to Seattle's Freeway Park which has some noise/acoustic issues relating to freeway traffic. A University of Southern California study has shown that children living near freeways are more likely to develop asthma and other respiratory problems.40 In addition, a recent study conducted in Sydney, Australia provides evidence that ultrafine particles produced by fuel combustion are lurking inside road tunnels in concentration levels so high they have the potential to harm drivers and passengers .41 However, exposure to air pollutants for a resident next to a freeway or for a driver inside the tunnel is not the same as for a park user above the freeway. Also, by covering segments of freeways, cap parks could possibly limit the amount of air pollutants adjacent residents would be exposed to. Published information, for the most part, indicates that the concentration of most air toxicants detected in communities exposed to tunnel emissions are below those concentrations that are generally considered to pose either a significant acute or chronic health hazard .42 Another environmental issue may be the short-term traffic and air quality impacts associated with the need to transport a significant amount of soil necessary to plant trees and landscaping at the park sites. The long-term air quality and noise impacts can be mitigated to some extent through the design of the parks. Some landscape architects argue that cap parks can mitigate the impacts without relying exclusively on mechanical systems. One idea, for example, is that the Hollywood Central Park could be designed to function as a "breathing apparatus" capable of filtering the carbon monoxide that would be vented out of the tunnel after the capping of the freeway.43 This proposed " Pool, B. (2008, November 19). Plan for park atop Hollywood Freeway is praised. L.A. Times, p. B3. 39 E-mail from Gayle Haberman of the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health received on 6/4/2010. 40 Gauderman, W. J. et al (2007). Effect of exposure to traffic on lung development from 10 to 18 years of age: a cohort study. The Lancet, 368, pp. 535-537. The study, which tracked 3,600 children for 13 years, found that those living within 500 yards of a highway faced risk of permanent health damage, including stunted lung growth and respiratory problems. 41 Queensland University of Technology (2009, August 30). Tunnels Concentrate Air Pollution By Up To 1,000 Times. ScienceDaily. Retrieved June 26, 2010, from http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/08 /090827101241.htm 42 Kuykendall, J.R. et al (2009). Chemicals present in automobile traffic tunnels and the possible community health hazards: A review of the literature. Inhalation Toxicology, 21(9), pp. 747-792. 43 Conversation with Gerdo Aquino of SWA Group on 7/2/2010. Professor Andrea Hricko of USC also expressed concerns about how and where air pollutants would be vented out from the tunnels during our phone conversation on 9/10/2010. 18 design would effectively suck up carbon monoxide from the tunnel and filter it through layers of vegetation on the surface. Some mechanical systems would be required, but the intent is to make visible the process of ventilation while incorporating an active, natural systems -based approach to filter the polluted air from the tunnel.aa From a big picture perspective, cap parks actually have the potential to improve the region's air quality and overall quality of life. In particular, the proposed cap parks are consistent with and help to implement Senate Bill 375 which seeks to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through land use planning. The vehicle for this coordination is a new regional land use plan called a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS). The result is expected to be more rational and coordinated regulation and public funding, which in turn should accelerate the pace at which development consistent with these plans can proceed. The Urban Land Institute (ULI)'s SB 375 Impact Analysis Report specifically points out that state funding priorities need to take into account: 1) SB 375 redirects future growth towards existing urban areas; and 2) in addition to transportation funds, other infrastructure investments such as monies for parks should also be linked to the SCS. Cap parks can also play an important role in the prevention and treatment of obesity. When people have access to parks, they are more likely to exercise, which can reduce obesity and its associated health risks and costs. As mentioned previously (on page 5), a number of studies have shown that enhanced access to places for physical activity produced an increase in the frequency of physical activity. Timing Because of their smaller size, Santa Monica's cap parks will most likely be developed before the proposals in Hollywood and downtown Los Angeles. As large-scale projects, Hollywood Central Park and PARK 101 will require lengthier environmental reviews and permitting processes. However, given the need for these parks, their potential benefits, and consistency with SB 375 goals, one might ask whether these reviews and processes could or should be streamlined or relaxed. 7. CONCLUSION As land has become increasingly scarce in Los Angeles, we need creative and resourceful planning solutions to meet the park and recreational needs of the population. Cap parks offer hope and benefits that simply cannot be ignored. In particular, larger cap parks have the potential to: improve regional air quality; help reduce obesity and its associated problems; create short- and long-term jobs; raise adjacent property values; and enhance the overall quality of life. While they can be costly and complex projects that are challenging to implement, cap parks represent a strategy that must be seriously considered to promote sustainability, address the need for more parkland, and reconnect neighborhoods that have been fragmented as a result of freeway construction. 44 E-mail from Gerdo Aquino of SWA Group on 8/31/2010. 19 REFERENCES AECOM. (2010, August). PARK 101 District Feasibility Study. Retrieved September 15, 2010, from http://www.compassblueprint.org/files/parkl01_report_web.pdf Arnold, C.A. (2007). Fair and healthy land use: environmental justice and planning. Chicago: American Planning Association. Casuso, J. (2009, March 26). Council Explores Big Plans for Civic Center. The LookOut news. Retrieved July 13, 2010, from http://www.surfsantamonica.com/ssm_site/ the lookout/ news/News-2009/March-2009 Crompton, J.L. (2001). Parks and economic development. Chicago: American Planning Association. Davies, V. (2008, August). A "Central Park" for Los Angeles? Urban Land, 67(8), 42-45. Day, K. (2006). Active Living and Social Justice: Planning for Physical Activity in Low-income, Black, and Latino Communities. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(1), 88-99. Di Rado, A. (2005, September 21). Childhood asthma linked to freeway pollution. USC News. Retrieved October 4, 2008, from http://www.usc.edu/uscnews/stories/11614.html DiMassa, C.M. (2009, March 28). Santa Monica considers `capping' freeway. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved March 28, 2009, from http://www.latimes.com/mews/local/la-me-freeway-cap28- 2009mar28,0,6738759.story EDAW/AECOM. (2008, October). Hollywood Freeway Central Park Feasibility Report. Retrieved November 23, 2008, from http://www.hollywoodchamber.net/business/HFCP_ Feasibility_ Report_20081008.pdf Garcia, R. & White, A. (2006). Healthy Parks, Schools, and Communities: Mapping Green Access and Equity for Los Angeles Region. Retrieved October 5, 2008, from http://www.cityprojectca.org/ourwork/mappinggreenaccess/documents/Healthy_Parks_Schools _Communities_textonly.pdf Gauderman, W. J., Vora, H., McConnell, R., Berhane, K., Gilliland, F., Thomas, D., Lurmann, F., Avol, E., Kunzli, N., Jerrett, M., & Peters, J. (2007, February). Effect of exposure to traffic on lung development from 10 to 18 years of age: a cohort study. The Lancet, 368, 535-537. Gies, E. (2006). The Health Benefits of Parks. San Francisco: Trust for Public Land. Harnik, P. (2010). Urban Green: Innovative Parks for Resurgent Cities. Washington: Island Press. Harnik, P. (2000). Inside City Parks. Washington, DC: Urban land Institute. Harnik, P. & Welle, B. (2007, April). Nature over traffic. Urban Land, 66(4), 102-105. Hise, G. & Deverell, W. (2000). Eden by Design: the 1930 Olmsted -Bartholomew Plan for the Los Angeles Region. Berkeley: University of California Press. 20 Hollywood Chamber of Commerce. (2007). Fact Sheet: Hollywood Freeway Central Park. Retrieved October 4, 2008, from http://www.hollywoodfreewaycentralpark.org/ docs/ HFCP_FactSheet.pdf Hyland, A. (2010, April 5). 101 Freeway Park Proposal Ramping Up. Los Angeles Business Journal. Retrieved July 13, 2010, from http://Iabusinessjournal.com/news/2010/apr/05/101- freeway-park-proposal-ramping Kuykendall, J.R., Shaw, S.L., Paustenbach, D., Fehling, K., Kacew, S., & Kabay, V. (2009). Chemicals present in automobile traffic tunnels and the possible community health hazards: A review of the literature. Inhalation Toxicology, 21(9), pp. 747-792. Linton, J. (2010, May 11). Park 101's Freeway Lid for a Walkable Downtown Los Angeles. Streetsblog Los Angeles. Retrieved July 1, 2010, from http://la.streetsbIog.org/ 2010/05/11 park - 101 s-freeway-lid-for-a-walkable-downtown-los-angeles Los Angeles County Department of Public Health. (2007, October). Preventing childhood obesity: the need to create healthy places. Retrieved October 11, 2008, from http://Iapublichealth.org/ wwwfiles/ph/hae/epi/chr2-ch ildhood_obesity. pdf Loukaitou-Sideris, A. & Stieglitz, O. (2002). Children in Los Angeles parks: a study of equity, quality and children's satisfaction with neighborhood parks. Town Planning Review, 73(4), 467- 488. Morris, M. (Ed.). (2006). Integrating planning and public health: tools and strategies to create healthy places. Chicago: American Planning Association. Pool, B. (2008, November 19). Plan for park atop Hollywood Freeway is praised. Los Angeles Times, p. B3. Queensland University of Technology (2009, August 30). Tunnels Concentrate Air Pollution By Up To 1,000 Times. ScienceDaily. Retrieved June 26, 2010, from http://www.sciencedaily.com/ releases/2009/08/090827101241.htm Richardson, E. (2010, May 11). Ambitious Park 101 Project Proposes Small First Step at Union Station. Blogdowntown.com. Retrieved July 2, 2010, from http://blogdowntown.com/ 2010/05/5332 -ambitious -park-101-project-proposes-small Richardson, E. (2010, July 1). Park 101 Costs and Next Steps Outlined by Study. Blogdowntown.com. Retrieved July 2, 2010, from http://blogdowntown.com/2010/07/5469-park- 101-costs-and-next-steps-outlined-by-study Sloane, D.C. (2006). From Congestion to Sprawl: Planning and Health in Historical Context. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(1), 10-18. Sloane, D.C., Nascimento, L., Flynn, G., Lewis, L., Jones Guinyard, J., Galloway -Gilliam, L., Diamant, A., & Yancey, A. (2006). Assessing Resource Environments to Target Prevention Interventions in Community Chronic Disease Control. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 17, 146-159. 21 Taborek, N. (2010, January 16). City Hall to take first step on freeway capping plan. Santa Monica Daily Press. Retrieved July 13, 2010, from http://www.smdp.com Townsend, G. (2010, February 24). Driving Green: LA flush with freeway park proposals. The Architect's Newspaper. Retrieved July 13, 2010, from http://www.archpaper.com/e- board_rev.asp? News-1 D=4275 Trust for Public Land. (2004, November). No place to play: a comparative analysis of park access in seven major cities. Retrieved October 4, 2008, from http://www.tpl.org/tier3_cd.cfm ?content item id=14565&folder id=266 Yanez, E. & Muzzy, W. (2005, October). Heathy Parks, Healthy Communities: Addressing Health Disparities and Park Inequities through Public Financing of Parks, Playgrounds, and Other Physical Activity Settings. San Francisco: Trust for Public Land. 22 PROJECT PROF/LES (VERTICAL & HORIZONTAL SCALE: I"=60') LEGEND VIEW PROFILE #1 VIEW PROFILE #4 PROJECT BOUNDARY LINE NATURAL GROUND DESIGN GROUND 2 PROPOSED GRADING 840 840 4 800 760 720 680 Fen 840 800 800- -760 760 720 LOT LINE OSED EASEMENT LINE NING WALL Lot No. Soo - CENTERLINE Lot No. DW PROPOSED WATER Acres s PROPOSED SEWER 760 0.181 30 —SD— PROPOSED STORM DRAIN PROPOSED GRADE 5,295 0.122 31 PR POSED SE WA L 0.114 32 �- 0.145 PRO N Q 0.113 33 + 0.123 p 5,140 0.118 QPR °C PROPOSE Nel N p I N Fi RETA PROPOSED 0.097 12 4,761 0.109 36 PROPOSED °C � 7,033 0.161 POSED MSE W LL 14 p _- + 4,232 PROPOSED A S. 15 "A" ST. Pad=7715* of 29 PROP "A" SED T ad=774. + Lot 2 40 4,652 XISTIN m� ,- Lot 4 41 TMSE'VALL Lot 24 PROPOSED + '11Z Z),�, m 1 Oi � 60.0* O Pa ]z I I P SADO PROPOSED MSE ALL 20 5,022 R P S ACCESS Lot 17 - PR AC -- -- SED ESS PR P ACC SED S ---- --__ + ING GR DE _ ,_______ - d=721. + 0.13 -- ----- -- -- - - -- _ - - ' 24 7,196 0.165 48 4,808 ----------- Lot 4,577 0.105 49 EXISTING CYN, RD. a Lots ARK i XISTIN REA CY .RAIN HANNE 0.125 _ PARK -' RDEN BASIN ---- �pl ----------------REA 28 Lot 9 ppl 5,160 IO -' 4,763 "B" ST. ISTING GROUND PROPOSED BADE - O Q I d=708.3 Lot 1 Pad- Lot 08.6* 1 A 11 Pad=7 Lot 7.8- Pad= Lo 07.4- 1 ---- ---- ---- _ _ , Lr S DI OND Pad 708.2* PROPOSED P =707.4 Pa =727.5 --- ---- ---- ---- 840 800 800- -760 760 720 8 0 LOT LINE OSED EASEMENT LINE NING WALL Lot No. Soo - CENTERLINE Lot No. DW PROPOSED WATER Acres s PROPOSED SEWER 760 0.181 30 —SD— PROPOSED STORM DRAIN 720 - 5' RTWL _ RETAINING WALL/ 5,295 0.122 31 6,674 0.153 8 4,945 0.114 32 �- 0.145 PRO N Q 0.113 33 p 0.123 p 5,140 0.118 P OPOSE PROPOSE 11 4,857 Pad=7 RETA PROPOSED 0.097 12 4,761 0.109 36 PROPOSED °C � 7,033 0.161 37 Np 14 p PROPOSED 38 4,232 0.097 15 "A" ST. SE WALL.1 of 29 30 0.102 16 lPad=762.02 "A" ST. 40 4,652 XISTIN m� I �O 41 TMSE'VALL ad=757. PROPOSED + "A" ST. Pad- 60.0* 4,924 Pa - + -766.0- LL P SADO R. 0.118 20 5,022 0.115 Lot 17 - 0.123 Lot 49 Lot 4 45 + ING GR DE _ ,_______ - d=721. + 0.13 23 �01 0.124 I 4,169 PROPOSEDLot 24 7,196 8 0 LOT LINE OSED EASEMENT LINE NING WALL Lot No. Soo - CENTERLINE Lot No. DW PROPOSED WATER Acres s PROPOSED SEWER 760 0.181 30 —SD— PROPOSED STORM DRAIN 720 - 5' RTWL _ RETAINING WALL/ 720 1 1 1 1RETAINING WALL HEIGHT 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 ,,—TOP OF SLOPE 680 \ R V -DITCH MSE WALL 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK CITY OF DIAMOND BAR -- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -- \ ♦; ' JJ ffl :. J J \JJJ JJ:J J 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680 720 760 800 840 880 920 960 1000 1040 1080 1120 1160 1200 1240 1280 1320 1360 1400 1440 1480 1520 1560 1600 \ A�°� PROPOSED 8' ENHANCED PAVEMENT VICINITY MAP VIEW PROFILE #2 PROPOSED GRADING � O � SIDEWALK NATURAL 800 800 \ \ EX. POWER POLE \ \ ' v TO BE RELOCATED >' / w ® NO TES 760 720 680 rR s \ AREA TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR - - \ 1. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 8714-002-900, 8714-002-901, 8714-002-902, Cut 8714 -002-903 AND 8714-015-001. 760 CUTIFILL LINE / \ s EX. R/W oh "'^ , ' 1oE T(P �" \ FIII 2. EXISTING & PROPOSED ZONING: SITE D SPECIFIC PLAN EX. CURB o \ \ PROPOSED CURB M M 2"Rr / �' 3. EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT PROPOSED R W i / \ � o � / � �'- o C u FIRE HYDRANT 720 EXISTING 8" SEWER \ \\ o' 4. PROPOSED LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL \\- V \ � ° EX SIGNAGE ,TO BE � � '� RT TO BE RELOCATED / �0 EES "X 1 SEWER DRAIN LOW PLOW 5. EXISTING & PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN: SPECIFIC PLAN, SITE D. 680 \ \ o''�!,- / ,1 cEs \ \I DIVERSION STRUCTURE • PG \ �\ T o / 6. ALL STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND GRADING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680 720 760 800 840 880 920 960 1000 1040 1080 1120 `, \:Z 26 & ��\� �v� _ r �^ 1, r WITH DIAMOND BAR STANDARDS, ORDINANCES AND APPROVED MODIFICATIONS HERETO. C> CONNECT TO EX, 10" ACP waTER / 0' / ��o X35 2A' / 5 ESM \` \\\ rr?r� r"r l\SCJ i��J,fl MP -40 MEDIA FILTER VIEW PROFILE #3 Z ,� EXISTING 8" SEWER / PR \ '� Q.1�' 13 ' \ }j\ J'� '_"1� ("� �r'�' (` �'J TREATMENT BMP 7. ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD SHALL BE ACCOMMODATED ON THE FINAL DESIGN, OR c� - / 8 2.s Rrwl \ \ \ 1���� 81 J .�5 50 r.J .� THEY SHALL BE EITHER QUITCLAIMED, ABANDONED OR RELOCATED TO THE - - - - - NATURAL GROUND PROPOSED GRADING NO � \ \ SATISFACTION OF ALL INTERESTED PARTIES DRAINAGE AND PUBLIC UTILITY goo PROPOSED MEDIAN \0 Q a / ^ �y \ \\ goo 760 720 6 NUMBER OF UNITS Summary of Areas PROVIDED COVERED (2 PER UNIT) Lot No. S.F Acres Lot No. S.F Acres 6 7,867 0.181 30 5,127 0.118 7 5,295 0.122 31 6,674 0.153 8 4,945 0.114 32 �- 0.145 9 N Q 0.113 33 5,346 0.123 10 5,140 0.118 P OPOSE PROPOSE 11 4,857 Pad=7 6.0+ PROPOSED 0.097 12 4,761 0.109 36 4,227 °C � 7,033 0.161 37 Np 14 p PROPOSED 38 4,232 0.097 15 "A" ST. SE WALL.1 of 29 30 0.102 16 4,328 "A" ST. 40 4,652 0.107 17 I 0.107 41 4,715 0.108 18 7,473 SE WALLa 4,924 0.113 NIC MIA LL 0.14 43 5,159 0.118 20 5,022 0.115 44 - 0.123 21 j O 45 + ING GR DE _ ,_______ - 46 5,683 0.13 23 �01 0.124 I 4,169 PROPOSEDLot 24 7,196 0.165 48 4,808 0.11 25 4,577 0.105 49 5,911 0.136 26 Lots 16-18 50 5,466 0.125 27 5,631 0.129 51 10 0.107 28 Lot 9 ppl 5,160 IO -' 4,763 "B" ST. PROPOSED BADE - Q I XISTIN A 11 ---- ---- ---- _ _ , Lr S DI OND Pad 708.2* PROPOSED P =707.4 Pa =727.5 --- ---- ---- ---- - BLVD. BLVD. -Pad=7,, a Pa =722.0* "B" ST. --------- Lot 2 Lor 1 Lot 4 m PROP SED RE AINING WALL EXISTING GRADE— P OPOSE RETAINING WAL rR s \ AREA TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR - - \ 1. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 8714-002-900, 8714-002-901, 8714-002-902, Cut 8714 -002-903 AND 8714-015-001. 760 CUTIFILL LINE / \ s EX. R/W oh "'^ , ' 1oE T(P �" \ FIII 2. EXISTING & PROPOSED ZONING: SITE D SPECIFIC PLAN EX. CURB o \ \ PROPOSED CURB M M 2"Rr / �' 3. EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT PROPOSED R W i / \ � o � / � �'- o C u FIRE HYDRANT 720 EXISTING 8" SEWER \ \\ o' 4. PROPOSED LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL \\- V \ � ° EX SIGNAGE ,TO BE � � '� RT TO BE RELOCATED / �0 EES "X 1 SEWER DRAIN LOW PLOW 5. EXISTING & PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN: SPECIFIC PLAN, SITE D. 680 \ \ o''�!,- / ,1 cEs \ \I DIVERSION STRUCTURE • PG \ �\ T o / 6. ALL STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND GRADING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680 720 760 800 840 880 920 960 1000 1040 1080 1120 `, \:Z 26 & ��\� �v� _ r �^ 1, r WITH DIAMOND BAR STANDARDS, ORDINANCES AND APPROVED MODIFICATIONS HERETO. C> CONNECT TO EX, 10" ACP waTER / 0' / ��o X35 2A' / 5 ESM \` \\\ rr?r� r"r l\SCJ i��J,fl MP -40 MEDIA FILTER VIEW PROFILE #3 Z ,� EXISTING 8" SEWER / PR \ '� Q.1�' 13 ' \ }j\ J'� '_"1� ("� �r'�' (` �'J TREATMENT BMP 7. ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD SHALL BE ACCOMMODATED ON THE FINAL DESIGN, OR c� - / 8 2.s Rrwl \ \ \ 1���� 81 J .�5 50 r.J .� THEY SHALL BE EITHER QUITCLAIMED, ABANDONED OR RELOCATED TO THE - - - - - NATURAL GROUND PROPOSED GRADING NO � \ \ SATISFACTION OF ALL INTERESTED PARTIES DRAINAGE AND PUBLIC UTILITY goo PROPOSED MEDIAN \0 Q a / ^ �y \ \\ goo 760 720 6 04a x Z �1 /� ^ / 3' .rwL - P260\\\\� \\ X139• \ \\ \ EASEMENTS NECESSARY TO SERVE THIS PROJECT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE S CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AND WITH THE UTILITY PURVEYORS. EXISTING STORM DRAIN EX SIGNAGE TO BE / h o/ \ ESM ' \\ `.\ \ \ � TO BE RELOCATED ���? - a5 s ° \\ \ w\� UTIL /T Y A GENC/ES EASEMENTS WILL BE ABANDONED DURING THE FINAL MAP PROCEDURES. goa F?11IIr id s.:lf- fll/ o ho ��5 V.Z� P \� 398 \\ 8. MULTI FAMILY BUILDING TO MEET NFPA 13 STANDARDS. . / o/ / 1 z1 1300 \ \�\ P,1 esti I \ WATER: TRASH: (SINGLE FAMILY HOMES) h o ' / Q% s 2 � / I WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WASTE MANAGEMENT INC. 9. ESTIMATED EARTHWORK QUANTITIES: 415,500 CYS. CUT 415,500 CYS. FILL. PROPOSED SIGNAL � ` / � � o � - \ o, 138• 1 271 S. BREA CANYON ROAD 13940 E. LIVE OAK AVE. Iso CONNECT TO EXISTING 2 �?' \ �' I o t`c WALNUT CA 91789 BALDWIN PARK CA 91706 10. SEWER SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION 10" ACP WATER 1 0 55 s �' o � � ^ •Z ' - Q'PGGE \� P 38.2 c�R- (909) 595-7554 (800) 266-7551 DISTRICT. FL �. \ I M G / ^ 5 \ SM �. =• 3 OSE RI 11. PER LA COUNTY FIRM PANEL 1880 OF 2350. 720 �/ s 2 v� \5 199 / ?'122 ` \ 1298 0 /kms L 5 go�NDP TELEPHONE SERVICE: TRASH: (FOR MULTI -FAMILY) ' � � \ N Q- � VERIZON VALLEY VISTA INC. \ ' \ s \ �` ✓' O`N � 5 I 12. PRIVATE WATER QUALITY BMP'S TO BE MAINTAINED BY H.O.A. / \\\ ;� 2 , / 139• ".' \\ WF�� 1400 PHILLIPS RANCH RD. 13940 E. LIVE OAK AVE. 30' LANDSG�4PE� 6� � � 22' 2 \ r- � = �' P' \ � o s� ,MSE TRE s I o �. P,1 G �2 P g8 f 5 2' �o R POMONA, CA 91766 BALDWIN PARK CA 91706 13 SETBA K. \ X55 ,12 N ��� \ P�0 LOTS 62 & 63 ARE TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR & MAINTAINED ,139• \o (800) 483-5000 (800) 266-7551 I., \ ` `j V \ \ BY THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. 90 SM �w N 60 \ \ 26, ��\ \ - ELECTRIC SERVICE: CABLE TV: a 40 so 120 160 200 240 280 320 iso 400 440 Oso 520 sso soo 640 sso 720 Iso soo 840 sao 920 o 816 ::.6.�: ::.: \ P,11 GESS �� ,122�g$ R / 2 • P,13 \ & SM-\. 14. ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG DIAMOND BAR BLVD, BREA CANYON RD AND / ,EX. SIGNAGE TO BE a o o ` 5 26 P0\\�\� P �REE�- \\ \ \\ SE Wpb I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. TIME WARNER PASADO DR. TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. TO BE RELOCATED \ o s 0, SMS » 5 _� \ \ X00 \ o \ \6 M 800 CIENEGA AVE. 1041 E. ROUTE 66 _ _ r --RIGHT-OF-WAY \ \ �`122� »� �136� \ \ �� P'1 — I _ SAN DIMAS, CA 91773 GLENDORA, CA 91740 1 ALL TRASH IS INDIVIDUAL PICK UP BY WASTE MANAGEMENT. TRASH PICK UP FOR Y/ TO i / a, \ P GE r-• 7 („ \ •� r - "� BE DEDICATED TO THE \ \ - ED ON B STREET TRASH PICK UP FOR S rr�r� � r � �� �:�JJI �0 o W 23' \ ' � �- 0% �' F �• 210 26' P ��\�\� �0 \ (800) 655 4555 LOTS 2 THROUGH 5 NEEDS TO BE LOCATED / CITY OF DIAMOND BAR �o rn �/ P,1 \ SSM\. \\\\ Q%1 ,1��' \ \ o POSTAL SERVICE: LOT 1 WILL BE ALONG THE LOOP ALLEY. a / o `�5 11 I ,1185 \ N 5 \ \ P \ \ GAS SERVICE: USPS EX. 12 ACP WATER o S 36 \ I \ "� 0 I}05 -! o Ow LOTS 1-5 TO BE MAPPED FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES. `' o P �`1 \ P' \ r - \ gR �yP SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. 1317 SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BLVD. 16. � 1 ,1 1 �j' / EX. Sic, cE To BE / / ,, \ 5, o� \\ P� GES o \\ 31p \'\ P _ �`'7. \ p\lGN' 1919 S. STATE COLLEGE BLVD. DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 PROPOSED MEDIAN, / TO BE REL OCA TED _ / / C • o '� \ 3 5 P 1 \ \ \ \ ( ) ' Z � \ � / X11 \ 2 ES\\- \ 6 6 MSF \ \ � �= • ' ANAHEIM, CA 92806 800 275-8777 17, STORM DRAIN SYSTEM TO BE PRIVATE. 1� (800) 427-2200 11 \\ 18. EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED PER TREE SURVEY. EX. POWER POLE \2 3 , / Q.°� o ,� P 0 \ \ \ 2 - \ o �3 5 q<<\ \ 11r SEWER SERVICE: (TRUNK LINES) i o 5\5 / '� �' Z \ \ ,131 \\ To BE RELocarED � - .� X00 0 � s 11� � � � � ` Q •' ' SCHOOL DISTRICT: LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT \ p 3 P' \-' \ 15 \ _ _ - 63' / - WALNUT VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPOSED SIGNAL �� -- _ - � P / � a• � •' ' 60 MODIFICATION AT 68x5 PROPOSED R Wi C° 11 .2 0 \ I 11 0 \ 2 \ J 7 \\ WHITTIER,1955 RCAA90607 N MILL ROAD DIAMOND BAR BLVD. 10 6" 1.6" &BREA CANYON RD. �- PROPOSED CURB r o \2 ti�� \\ P 2 C `� 20 `� I \\ \ P"\ 5 '12a 0 / X62 h 880 SOUTH LEMON AVE. LOT SUMMARY o \ �" N \ 0 \ �8 \\\ WALNUT, CA 91789 (562) 699-7411 C. F. PER PLAN 6" 12" 12" / ' 3811 .8 F PROPOSED SI - y P 112 6 0 1 0 3 0 1 R \ 6 0 11x 5 \ 12 I 3 , .. 188.5 J \\ I ; - \\ 3 0 0 /, 6 \\ O cE5 - =. i. o \ 2 \ \ o 60 188 o Lot No. Land Use Units Acres z a W 1 S 11 • o P' 0 s- P' \\ '° SEWER SERVICE: (MAIN LINES) TC 12"Iy S v EX�R/W rn rn n - ...:. ..... .: 3 1 1 \\ 26' P �S\\\� ° F ° \ \ \ \ P' 0 W. G �Q // I - 2a' �' P' 33 \\\ / �, LOS ANGELES COUNTY OF PUBLIC WORKS EX. CURB tr <r m 14 12 & N. 2 5 \ \ \ :Z • • 1 5 PER PLAN — _ o 12" c ,1 SS \\ sM 50' \ ' \ \ 1a 1 \\ SEWER MAINTENANCE DISTRICT LOT 1 MULTI -FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO 62 3.3 R-3 W •� _ o y ,�- P cE E $ a � I '� 1 �w� � �. R-1/2" - . a - � �_ EX. POWER POLE' _ _ rn - X112• n R'P� \ qR 60 •. � 6o Q 8 \ o 12" 1z"w �• - � 5 0 � � � N 900 FREEMONT R=1/2" -112"- TO BE RELOCATED N N / \\ \ 26 g v�M\. .2 \\ Q' Q i IIS 15 h o\ o\ \ oma\ 5 P�11g / Z 35 6\ 3j \ R 81 3 ^�`� ALHAMBRA, CA LOTS 2-5 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDOS 73 5.9 R-1/2" FL ��-� Q' �F \ 3 \ 1• . O ro o x �2f ,- �_ _:_'� ; - rrv/ii Q,1 \ � ,112• Q - 5-�R,! ` •... / -- _ :; ::::�: '- �� ° � o- � 0 1 00 C5o / LOTS 6-52 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED 47 5.7 • 80 165' ER goo �° k9 \ \\ \\ 0� ... 8 0 00 Ln / LOT 53-57 SLOPES/OPEN SPACE 5.7 ' 72 1 _ .. , . .. .., .. .. RIGHT-OF-WAY TO J� I 680 - �'Z Q �1 1 3 ° O`N /y" \ \ 26 PVA\' �tss�, \ I � \ � • R �$ � 6� 0/ � R32' / � 00 2 O 01 I MP 40 TORM DRAIN \ Q OAR 1 1 1 \ ^ 4' o. 3 1 • EXISTING EA SEMEN TS BE DEDICATED TO THE / , / o y06 ,113• '�� \ & c�M�• j . 15• n 6 0 0 �- �� / �� 3' BROW o ° / _ MEDIA FILTER $ LOW FLOW w �; Q- \ E 1 �o' \ , \ �c �� 6$ 186' % LOT 58 PRIVATE STREETS 4.0 R=1 <1" N CITY OF DIAMOND BAR TREATMENT BMP_ C°�' 081 _ T / " 6 ' \ \\� �s I ' P� / / DITCH, TYP • ,� ::::: / D/VERSION o � I '�s • • _ o \o CTURE 1 S5 o. Nj$ 60 %� / / /i' 2 EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED/SON COMPANY FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES LOT 59-61 PRIVATE DRIVEWAYS 0.1 ,18 O O __ -- _ TR Es I REG. FEBRUARY 8, 1954 /N BOOK 43774, PAGE 241, O.R. `�,; 6 �� \ \ „ LOT 62 RAIN GARDEN PARK/BASIN 3.8 4 ROLLED CURB & GUTTER 6 CURB & CUTTER ' / / // ' \ \ � � � �`' � P'1 Vo, o ®' f� � 3 � 2 1 I I I �i � l ,••' . � o_ 3 �I`� I � � - 3 EASEMENT TO GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, A CORPORATION 7 _< moo' � , /// ,/ �\ 79. �fi2 ,� �'� � ,111' S' ,116' . I � I / . •'• .•' /' S5 � // O NTS NTS //� / / / \ v / �\ 25' P' 113h \ Q'X18 ' �'� 19 I �� 7 0 /i \ FOR POLE LINES REC. APRIL 28, 1954 /N BOOK 44446, PAGE 33, O.R. LOT 63 PARK 0.9 (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) (FOR REFERENCE ONLY)PGG�Sw � P' I i � '160 /. > � ' °� % c, / ° 1 �s / I 71+35 I o / `�' �` / X1815 I \ Q -- / 6 EASEMENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR STORM DRAIN PURPOSES AS SHOWN ON TRACT No. 27577 REC. IN RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATED TO 0.5 TREE O- � O // O� / c9 //� � `�" � - ;' � 32� '^ o , . ? 110. �o � i� � 2 O 15• I �' a/ sem, ����p / / / / � � �o ,,o� F ;, ,• �� � ,112• ,1 \ �qY .• I . 8 'L I`- � i BK. 702, PGS. 22 TO 25 INCLUSIVE OF MAPS RECORDS LOS ANGELES COUNTY. THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR � / / �,• - / _ o� = ; �'; /� �P P \ ;f., 69' ' ..-'• I I I , 845 ,' s,. -mss a10 � IN � ' � � EX. - CURB ^� >o / 3' TOE 9 EASEMENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR WATER PIPE -LINES REG. AUGUST 31, 1960 AS INST. No. 3278, IN BK.; TOTAL 182 29.9 / EX. R/W ���'�� �� / / / /' / //Qri o� i °s, / 2 , / '�� 21118 ,113. I I \o / \ 0&\ / o j 2 `j1 'o / / DITCH, TYP- O I \ > 5 / 0 0962 PAGE 305, O.R. SURVEYORS NOTE: EASEMENT FOLLOWS THE CENTERLINE OF DIAMOND BAR BLVD., EX. POWER POLE x / \� / , - A ESS Q' P� 0 I O h ti 3' �` rc PGG ✓ R AND UTILITIES / PROPOSED CURB // ��p // / _/ - / > Qr /% 26 0�\�\� N R� l �9 �/ �b c� ! L IOJ.>9 \'�6 �l ' �� NO WIDTH IS GIVEN IN THE DOCUMENT. TO BE RELOCATED —1 / Orb / �� \0 4 M\• l l ^ d �1`' S5 S� GARAGE PROPOSED R/W / / / / ^ / / / , /r! ; > > ES 12 PEDESTRIAN l / �/ X18 6' /i / ° o DOOR / / / \ / / ^ 1 �0 2g. �_ �z ,11 ' �S -.,,t _ — K = 0 9 P o. li, - ^� , 1 7 EASEMENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR STREET PURPOSES AS SHOWN ON TRACT No. 25989 REG. IN BK. 714, BENCH MARK / / / O o\ / >o <b q� c P 1 '� g .Z ROSSWAL / l / 2 / �1 �5 c� 6» / ,x, / / 1 / 3 O UT CFS - Js • 12 L� "o �� Q%18 o d 29 �5 \ �i �`' / PGS 5 TO 7 OF MAPS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY. / O� > > >. GESS \ ,1 \ o / s �' �o / / O "�' / o / r^ Y/7Y S g , 2 PG SM N P 8 / 0 Kn- \ x > o LOS ANGELES COUNTY BENCHMARK N0. G 5073 ELEVATION: 726.809 DATUM: NAVD 88 �6, / / \6� S' S / .' gp.. , 2% MIN. EASEMENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR STORM DRAINS AND SANITARY SEWER AS SHOWN ON TRACT NO. 27577 2005 ADJUSTMENT / REC. IN BK. 702, PGS. 22 TO 25 INCLUSIVE OF MAPS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY. r' N o• � F \ \ `. • • ... .. � / C,Q ro h / � /'../ '� � ., ' ®_ o .-' � `-o 9<< 's- x / � i^ \ x 86� �,. /i .`� DESCRIPTION: EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN COUNT/ES GAS COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA FOR GAS PIPE LINES, LIGHT, POWER LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TAG IN EAST CURB OF DIAMOND T TREE 6 I / `� ' /y Ss R> row i P / , ,1 / P' o \ 3O i / / PURPOSES REC. FEBRUARY 17, 1964 REC. AS INST 3774, O.R. BAR BLVD. 42.7 FEET EAST OF CENTERLINE AND 95 FEET NORTH OF CENTERLINE OF ' \ /',� / h i FsM . \9' , ;�- �� (p / o4c'/ P J'I ' go / �� ° CROOKED CREEK DRIVE. / o / O`o� �,�' / � ` / / � � � _ � - •.-':- � �P,153• /'�/ � �,y� / 5 EASEMENT TO THE DIAMOND BAR WATER COMPANY FOR WATER PIPES REC. AUGUST 31, 1960 REG. IN BK. �Z / / h o / - / , / 20' 0' �- 6 / ' / / / / s-/' 6s' \ / i \ �° V o° 0-962, PAGE 305, O.R. AND REC. DATE.- AUGUST 10, 1964 AS /NST No. 3417, O.R. �0 675 / O� / - -'� / / iO LOT �' o / ��' / �O >9 / / s,.�j 1, R 15 15 , / o w� O / i �o , /� z9 d 7W[ ,18 /i $ SURVEYORS NOTE 0" CURB DETAIL -- - �p // / / /s, 8 O2 > r 0 P / , EASEMENT FOLLOWS THECENTERLINE OF DIAMOND BAR BLVD., NO WIDTH /S GIVEN NTS / �� L0�3 O / I ` /O , / / �/� >>2 o- / , s /'o • / c / 1 .I , / 2 �`� IN THE DOCUMENT. ` ARK O . �, ^ h .� / 3 5 g1' , 15 • / , r 6 , 2 / L 54 /, 3' BROW X25 (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) 3 ' O ' / / ♦ \ 8 , / Q' 1. , , ,1 I/ / Q �` ^> i DITCH, TYP 30 �O� / � /, � 1 a � � > � / � LEGAL DESCRIPTION ss � � ❑ EASEMENT TO THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FOR SANITARY SEWER PURPOSES REC. NOVEMBER 11, 1971 C � / � / .• / r 7 O• / .• .• � � . •�r i / o� " � Ac 1`O � 4 R� 10/I� / 0 / ,c / 6 3 Nl / / / / / > �, ♦/ / / `� 9- / c�/ , X18 O1°' // 35 AS INSL 3366, O.R.. BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 29 TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 9 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO E 4 : / 1 � -� \ - / � 10 > >/ 7 � /rr. / . • / 60 � / � / ®�\ 6 RTWL P �O L>' /j'\`°`L '� $ ° ^ O � 4 EXISTING / / / P / ri s� / p I}0 / , p \ �j �\ 3 / �/ a� �e> x MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, COUTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. \ / �L / h EASEMENT TO THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FOR STORM DRAIN INGRESS AND EGRESS REC, DATE. UNDERGROUND l / / / /ti /�' / he ..�` 0 �5 ,15 �' 115 / \ / / / a5 w / SURFACE FLOWS / / 1 I / �`� - / ��, p1 / / P / ,1 / 5 . ♦ �. 6 , r Q / a > �, A / �O i l / / ,� / / O / l �., ,1 / , /,� P �, 6 d \ S / p3 i go , ' P oL 1�o� Q / 01 / / ° \ 1 5 / / /� a �5 MAY 18, 1982 AS INST. 82-508759, O. R. 670 / ETRE a 7 2o ti 719 5 Q 5 P , s G� STATEMENT OF OWNERSHIP 26' o /'� v l 7 / • / ,�0 sem' ' `��G X169 �y� / Dr � v �� / /'� p a51.3 I --I 1 ^ / I �' ^O l \ P ; �� , Z \ /ij' �� '< 8�° X °° TREES 60X70 O L O T Q• I I ��--- �S, // 6 cPo ,15 s \ �(p G�4 / / \\ O, 4110", �F 9 F _ _ _ > C P P \ > ° I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED UNDER MY I \� / 8 �, O �\ \ L / X FESS rr`� / / ^ 3.1 ss / �, / > Og. / / 550 �`L c� �j2 �,> \\ �5_ _ //i c�GP \ / \ _ / SINGLE FAM/L Y SUPERVISION AND THAT THE OWNER OF RECORD HAS KNOWLEDGE Quo i0� - - J V I / \ <v <v / �1 / ,1 8 O \ cP co 1 0 \ �/ \ _ - - / 0 ( � � OF AND CONSENTS TO THE FILING OF THIS MAP. \ Dh > / \ /'�� Y' 1 Q O >> Q /. ,/ •� ,�0�%� 5 5 ,`c�� \ e oP' \�\ 2� /. / , \Q' / TREES \ �C. ti V� \ 'L) A+ % �j9,, 3 �`' o ' O -� / ° /•' / 5 \ �10 6 l , / x POOL \ / i `' \� �,, / P,155' Y `e j S PT ] �� ] 7S, ` \ \10 / \� I ` 690 -- /' ' / s 60 o. s / o� ^ ^ _ 18' DITCH; TY FIRE TRUCK 670. �, , / \ o �z o �� ��� �30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK Qq v II S , 2' / x / h� A P 155 P �16 / �`c�h ` ^ TURNING RADIUS DETAIL . 81.4 I 236: °' A r- / �••.- - r- NTS 7,,r ?A .. r ��, ��� -1 � o , �,�6, _ _ � , 7 8.05 � J N � O �6, / � � ^ cp0,, - - , , �} POOL , f .� --�8 I: P 3 �� �c , �� ° 6� �o s �.,, �h rr?r� (,r \J� EXISr�I \ ^°/ �• �. r ,.N /' I cn ,� SS ESMr \ �p `V ` , " \� '� ' �� ' w'. \ ' • '-- � S9' 6o P,155' �. ` `� ^ � \ �, �n 6°` O ♦ cP0_ ^ I /%, /760 // -F 682.1 \ I POOL 68. - \ - - \ -- - \ A \s // 16�• \ /� l/ / \ x o �S� o \ >Qo.. \ \ 6p w -' 21 ♦ / l ' i / ISO TYPICAL STREET SECTIONS- \ / I 685.7 hz., x Op 25 ^ 15 6 610 !i DI H, lYP r- r1r-+� SERVICE ROAD AND V - - ° �1P •z `^ ° �O 6 Q%1 /, a rr�r� r r\�� �:�J�3J PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ONLY - - 2 �� �• \ ,156 s Q \ f . 2 EMERGENCY R/W R/W o . \ \ \ !k - �� /, / TRE 85, /v INGRESS/EGRESS \ s 0 TREES 3.6P%158'TYP / 5' I 5 / \ x VARIES 8' 25' 14 26 S' 8' VARIES \ O/ �� 68° J c\ LANDSCAPE MEDIAN LANDSCAPE Q ` �� \ 3' TOE DITCH, TYP _ _ \ \ �6 ` moi' O soo.4 \ I cv \ 5 j ii x 12 EASEMENT \ 1 \ �^"� 21 \ rn �O` ,1 1' tw p`l it i / 8' EASEMENT `� / ~ I ^ \ .�$ i �' / 2' 14. 14.0' 2' 0,5' EASEMENT 0.5' 2' 12.0 2' 9'r 2.09 2.09 2.0% 2'\ � / � \ \ '•. - O� � `�'' / 2.0% ��, 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK �� S��P s �P\� i / 0.5' 0.5' EES 5 a S 4PX 5' SIDEWALK �5' SIDEWALK � � �� � � M 5 PARKWAY 6" CURB 5' PARKWAY - EMERGENCY $ \\ \ °- / / I 2 / �qX 2.0% 2 I 2 /� \ ` 1 z / INGRESS/EGRESS / �P� 2/ �P / 6" CURB &GUTTER 6" CURB &GUTTER 39 �- \ 1 4i \ A \ / 2' qI SWALE SWALE 2 X SECTION A -A \ \ `ro s� $ i �'/ 5 \\ Al' BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM NUMBER OF UNITS Summary of Areas PROVIDED COVERED (2 PER UNIT) Lot No. S.F Acres Lot No. S.F Acres 6 7,867 0.181 30 5,127 0.118 7 5,295 0.122 31 6,674 0.153 8 4,945 0.114 32 �- 0.145 9 4,928 0.113 33 5,346 0.123 10 5,140 0.118 34 4,408 PROPOSE 11 4,857 Pad=7 6.0+ 4,235 0.097 12 4,761 0.109 36 4,227 °C � 7,033 0.161 37 0.097 14 PROPOSED 0.113 38 4,232 0.097 15 "A" ST. 0.107 of 29 30 0.102 16 4,328 0.099 40 4,652 0.107 17 I 0.107 41 4,715 0.108 18 7,473 SE WALLa 4,924 0.113 =85.52 + 0.14 43 5,159 0.118 20 5,022 0.115 44 5,347 0.123 21 j O 45 EXIS ING GR DE 5,731 0.132 46 5,683 0.13 23 5,419 0.124 47 4,169 0.096 24 7,196 0.165 48 4,808 0.11 25 4,577 0.105 49 5,911 0.136 26 5,214 0.12 50 5,466 0.125 27 5,631 0.129 51 4,645 0.107 28 Lot 9 52 5,160 0.118 29 4,763 0.109 EXISTING Lr S DI OND BAR PROPOSED Pa =727.5 BLVD. -Pad=7,, a Pa =722.0* "B" ST. --------- ---I _t4 Lot 4 PROP SED RE AINING WALL P OPOSE RETAINING WAL PROPOSED GRADE m 04a x Z �1 /� ^ / 3' .rwL - P260\\\\� \\ X139• \ \\ \ EASEMENTS NECESSARY TO SERVE THIS PROJECT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE S CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AND WITH THE UTILITY PURVEYORS. EXISTING STORM DRAIN EX SIGNAGE TO BE / h o/ \ ESM ' \\ `.\ \ \ � TO BE RELOCATED ���? - a5 s ° \\ \ w\� UTIL /T Y A GENC/ES EASEMENTS WILL BE ABANDONED DURING THE FINAL MAP PROCEDURES. goa F?11IIr id s.:lf- fll/ o ho ��5 V.Z� P \� 398 \\ 8. MULTI FAMILY BUILDING TO MEET NFPA 13 STANDARDS. . / o/ / 1 z1 1300 \ \�\ P,1 esti I \ WATER: TRASH: (SINGLE FAMILY HOMES) h o ' / Q% s 2 � / I WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WASTE MANAGEMENT INC. 9. ESTIMATED EARTHWORK QUANTITIES: 415,500 CYS. CUT 415,500 CYS. FILL. PROPOSED SIGNAL � ` / � � o � - \ o, 138• 1 271 S. BREA CANYON ROAD 13940 E. LIVE OAK AVE. Iso CONNECT TO EXISTING 2 �?' \ �' I o t`c WALNUT CA 91789 BALDWIN PARK CA 91706 10. SEWER SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION 10" ACP WATER 1 0 55 s �' o � � ^ •Z ' - Q'PGGE \� P 38.2 c�R- (909) 595-7554 (800) 266-7551 DISTRICT. FL �. \ I M G / ^ 5 \ SM �. =• 3 OSE RI 11. PER LA COUNTY FIRM PANEL 1880 OF 2350. 720 �/ s 2 v� \5 199 / ?'122 ` \ 1298 0 /kms L 5 go�NDP TELEPHONE SERVICE: TRASH: (FOR MULTI -FAMILY) ' � � \ N Q- � VERIZON VALLEY VISTA INC. \ ' \ s \ �` ✓' O`N � 5 I 12. PRIVATE WATER QUALITY BMP'S TO BE MAINTAINED BY H.O.A. / \\\ ;� 2 , / 139• ".' \\ WF�� 1400 PHILLIPS RANCH RD. 13940 E. LIVE OAK AVE. 30' LANDSG�4PE� 6� � � 22' 2 \ r- � = �' P' \ � o s� ,MSE TRE s I o �. P,1 G �2 P g8 f 5 2' �o R POMONA, CA 91766 BALDWIN PARK CA 91706 13 SETBA K. \ X55 ,12 N ��� \ P�0 LOTS 62 & 63 ARE TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR & MAINTAINED ,139• \o (800) 483-5000 (800) 266-7551 I., \ ` `j V \ \ BY THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. 90 SM �w N 60 \ \ 26, ��\ \ - ELECTRIC SERVICE: CABLE TV: a 40 so 120 160 200 240 280 320 iso 400 440 Oso 520 sso soo 640 sso 720 Iso soo 840 sao 920 o 816 ::.6.�: ::.: \ P,11 GESS �� ,122�g$ R / 2 • P,13 \ & SM-\. 14. ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG DIAMOND BAR BLVD, BREA CANYON RD AND / ,EX. SIGNAGE TO BE a o o ` 5 26 P0\\�\� P �REE�- \\ \ \\ SE Wpb I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. TIME WARNER PASADO DR. TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. TO BE RELOCATED \ o s 0, SMS » 5 _� \ \ X00 \ o \ \6 M 800 CIENEGA AVE. 1041 E. ROUTE 66 _ _ r --RIGHT-OF-WAY \ \ �`122� »� �136� \ \ �� P'1 — I _ SAN DIMAS, CA 91773 GLENDORA, CA 91740 1 ALL TRASH IS INDIVIDUAL PICK UP BY WASTE MANAGEMENT. TRASH PICK UP FOR Y/ TO i / a, \ P GE r-• 7 („ \ •� r - "� BE DEDICATED TO THE \ \ - ED ON B STREET TRASH PICK UP FOR S rr�r� � r � �� �:�JJI �0 o W 23' \ ' � �- 0% �' F �• 210 26' P ��\�\� �0 \ (800) 655 4555 LOTS 2 THROUGH 5 NEEDS TO BE LOCATED / CITY OF DIAMOND BAR �o rn �/ P,1 \ SSM\. \\\\ Q%1 ,1��' \ \ o POSTAL SERVICE: LOT 1 WILL BE ALONG THE LOOP ALLEY. a / o `�5 11 I ,1185 \ N 5 \ \ P \ \ GAS SERVICE: USPS EX. 12 ACP WATER o S 36 \ I \ "� 0 I}05 -! o Ow LOTS 1-5 TO BE MAPPED FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES. `' o P �`1 \ P' \ r - \ gR �yP SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. 1317 SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BLVD. 16. � 1 ,1 1 �j' / EX. Sic, cE To BE / / ,, \ 5, o� \\ P� GES o \\ 31p \'\ P _ �`'7. \ p\lGN' 1919 S. STATE COLLEGE BLVD. DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 PROPOSED MEDIAN, / TO BE REL OCA TED _ / / C • o '� \ 3 5 P 1 \ \ \ \ ( ) ' Z � \ � / X11 \ 2 ES\\- \ 6 6 MSF \ \ � �= • ' ANAHEIM, CA 92806 800 275-8777 17, STORM DRAIN SYSTEM TO BE PRIVATE. 1� (800) 427-2200 11 \\ 18. EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED PER TREE SURVEY. EX. POWER POLE \2 3 , / Q.°� o ,� P 0 \ \ \ 2 - \ o �3 5 q<<\ \ 11r SEWER SERVICE: (TRUNK LINES) i o 5\5 / '� �' Z \ \ ,131 \\ To BE RELocarED � - .� X00 0 � s 11� � � � � ` Q •' ' SCHOOL DISTRICT: LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT \ p 3 P' \-' \ 15 \ _ _ - 63' / - WALNUT VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPOSED SIGNAL �� -- _ - � P / � a• � •' ' 60 MODIFICATION AT 68x5 PROPOSED R Wi C° 11 .2 0 \ I 11 0 \ 2 \ J 7 \\ WHITTIER,1955 RCAA90607 N MILL ROAD DIAMOND BAR BLVD. 10 6" 1.6" &BREA CANYON RD. �- PROPOSED CURB r o \2 ti�� \\ P 2 C `� 20 `� I \\ \ P"\ 5 '12a 0 / X62 h 880 SOUTH LEMON AVE. LOT SUMMARY o \ �" N \ 0 \ �8 \\\ WALNUT, CA 91789 (562) 699-7411 C. F. PER PLAN 6" 12" 12" / ' 3811 .8 F PROPOSED SI - y P 112 6 0 1 0 3 0 1 R \ 6 0 11x 5 \ 12 I 3 , .. 188.5 J \\ I ; - \\ 3 0 0 /, 6 \\ O cE5 - =. i. o \ 2 \ \ o 60 188 o Lot No. Land Use Units Acres z a W 1 S 11 • o P' 0 s- P' \\ '° SEWER SERVICE: (MAIN LINES) TC 12"Iy S v EX�R/W rn rn n - ...:. ..... .: 3 1 1 \\ 26' P �S\\\� ° F ° \ \ \ \ P' 0 W. G �Q // I - 2a' �' P' 33 \\\ / �, LOS ANGELES COUNTY OF PUBLIC WORKS EX. CURB tr <r m 14 12 & N. 2 5 \ \ \ :Z • • 1 5 PER PLAN — _ o 12" c ,1 SS \\ sM 50' \ ' \ \ 1a 1 \\ SEWER MAINTENANCE DISTRICT LOT 1 MULTI -FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO 62 3.3 R-3 W •� _ o y ,�- P cE E $ a � I '� 1 �w� � �. R-1/2" - . a - � �_ EX. POWER POLE' _ _ rn - X112• n R'P� \ qR 60 •. � 6o Q 8 \ o 12" 1z"w �• - � 5 0 � � � N 900 FREEMONT R=1/2" -112"- TO BE RELOCATED N N / \\ \ 26 g v�M\. .2 \\ Q' Q i IIS 15 h o\ o\ \ oma\ 5 P�11g / Z 35 6\ 3j \ R 81 3 ^�`� ALHAMBRA, CA LOTS 2-5 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDOS 73 5.9 R-1/2" FL ��-� Q' �F \ 3 \ 1• . O ro o x �2f ,- �_ _:_'� ; - rrv/ii Q,1 \ � ,112• Q - 5-�R,! ` •... / -- _ :; ::::�: '- �� ° � o- � 0 1 00 C5o / LOTS 6-52 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED 47 5.7 • 80 165' ER goo �° k9 \ \\ \\ 0� ... 8 0 00 Ln / LOT 53-57 SLOPES/OPEN SPACE 5.7 ' 72 1 _ .. , . .. .., .. .. RIGHT-OF-WAY TO J� I 680 - �'Z Q �1 1 3 ° O`N /y" \ \ 26 PVA\' �tss�, \ I � \ � • R �$ � 6� 0/ � R32' / � 00 2 O 01 I MP 40 TORM DRAIN \ Q OAR 1 1 1 \ ^ 4' o. 3 1 • EXISTING EA SEMEN TS BE DEDICATED TO THE / , / o y06 ,113• '�� \ & c�M�• j . 15• n 6 0 0 �- �� / �� 3' BROW o ° / _ MEDIA FILTER $ LOW FLOW w �; Q- \ E 1 �o' \ , \ �c �� 6$ 186' % LOT 58 PRIVATE STREETS 4.0 R=1 <1" N CITY OF DIAMOND BAR TREATMENT BMP_ C°�' 081 _ T / " 6 ' \ \\� �s I ' P� / / DITCH, TYP • ,� ::::: / D/VERSION o � I '�s • • _ o \o CTURE 1 S5 o. Nj$ 60 %� / / /i' 2 EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED/SON COMPANY FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES LOT 59-61 PRIVATE DRIVEWAYS 0.1 ,18 O O __ -- _ TR Es I REG. FEBRUARY 8, 1954 /N BOOK 43774, PAGE 241, O.R. `�,; 6 �� \ \ „ LOT 62 RAIN GARDEN PARK/BASIN 3.8 4 ROLLED CURB & GUTTER 6 CURB & CUTTER ' / / // ' \ \ � � � �`' � P'1 Vo, o ®' f� � 3 � 2 1 I I I �i � l ,••' . � o_ 3 �I`� I � � - 3 EASEMENT TO GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, A CORPORATION 7 _< moo' � , /// ,/ �\ 79. �fi2 ,� �'� � ,111' S' ,116' . I � I / . •'• .•' /' S5 � // O NTS NTS //� / / / \ v / �\ 25' P' 113h \ Q'X18 ' �'� 19 I �� 7 0 /i \ FOR POLE LINES REC. APRIL 28, 1954 /N BOOK 44446, PAGE 33, O.R. LOT 63 PARK 0.9 (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) (FOR REFERENCE ONLY)PGG�Sw � P' I i � '160 /. > � ' °� % c, / ° 1 �s / I 71+35 I o / `�' �` / X1815 I \ Q -- / 6 EASEMENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR STORM DRAIN PURPOSES AS SHOWN ON TRACT No. 27577 REC. IN RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATED TO 0.5 TREE O- � O // O� / c9 //� � `�" � - ;' � 32� '^ o , . ? 110. �o � i� � 2 O 15• I �' a/ sem, ����p / / / / � � �o ,,o� F ;, ,• �� � ,112• ,1 \ �qY .• I . 8 'L I`- � i BK. 702, PGS. 22 TO 25 INCLUSIVE OF MAPS RECORDS LOS ANGELES COUNTY. THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR � / / �,• - / _ o� = ; �'; /� �P P \ ;f., 69' ' ..-'• I I I , 845 ,' s,. -mss a10 � IN � ' � � EX. - CURB ^� >o / 3' TOE 9 EASEMENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR WATER PIPE -LINES REG. AUGUST 31, 1960 AS INST. No. 3278, IN BK.; TOTAL 182 29.9 / EX. R/W ���'�� �� / / / /' / //Qri o� i °s, / 2 , / '�� 21118 ,113. I I \o / \ 0&\ / o j 2 `j1 'o / / DITCH, TYP- O I \ > 5 / 0 0962 PAGE 305, O.R. SURVEYORS NOTE: EASEMENT FOLLOWS THE CENTERLINE OF DIAMOND BAR BLVD., EX. POWER POLE x / \� / , - A ESS Q' P� 0 I O h ti 3' �` rc PGG ✓ R AND UTILITIES / PROPOSED CURB // ��p // / _/ - / > Qr /% 26 0�\�\� N R� l �9 �/ �b c� ! L IOJ.>9 \'�6 �l ' �� NO WIDTH IS GIVEN IN THE DOCUMENT. TO BE RELOCATED —1 / Orb / �� \0 4 M\• l l ^ d �1`' S5 S� GARAGE PROPOSED R/W / / / / ^ / / / , /r! ; > > ES 12 PEDESTRIAN l / �/ X18 6' /i / ° o DOOR / / / \ / / ^ 1 �0 2g. �_ �z ,11 ' �S -.,,t _ — K = 0 9 P o. li, - ^� , 1 7 EASEMENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR STREET PURPOSES AS SHOWN ON TRACT No. 25989 REG. IN BK. 714, BENCH MARK / / / O o\ / >o <b q� c P 1 '� g .Z ROSSWAL / l / 2 / �1 �5 c� 6» / ,x, / / 1 / 3 O UT CFS - Js • 12 L� "o �� Q%18 o d 29 �5 \ �i �`' / PGS 5 TO 7 OF MAPS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY. / O� > > >. GESS \ ,1 \ o / s �' �o / / O "�' / o / r^ Y/7Y S g , 2 PG SM N P 8 / 0 Kn- \ x > o LOS ANGELES COUNTY BENCHMARK N0. G 5073 ELEVATION: 726.809 DATUM: NAVD 88 �6, / / \6� S' S / .' gp.. , 2% MIN. EASEMENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR STORM DRAINS AND SANITARY SEWER AS SHOWN ON TRACT NO. 27577 2005 ADJUSTMENT / REC. IN BK. 702, PGS. 22 TO 25 INCLUSIVE OF MAPS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY. r' N o• � F \ \ `. • • ... .. � / C,Q ro h / � /'../ '� � ., ' ®_ o .-' � `-o 9<< 's- x / � i^ \ x 86� �,. /i .`� DESCRIPTION: EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN COUNT/ES GAS COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA FOR GAS PIPE LINES, LIGHT, POWER LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TAG IN EAST CURB OF DIAMOND T TREE 6 I / `� ' /y Ss R> row i P / , ,1 / P' o \ 3O i / / PURPOSES REC. FEBRUARY 17, 1964 REC. AS INST 3774, O.R. BAR BLVD. 42.7 FEET EAST OF CENTERLINE AND 95 FEET NORTH OF CENTERLINE OF ' \ /',� / h i FsM . \9' , ;�- �� (p / o4c'/ P J'I ' go / �� ° CROOKED CREEK DRIVE. / o / O`o� �,�' / � ` / / � � � _ � - •.-':- � �P,153• /'�/ � �,y� / 5 EASEMENT TO THE DIAMOND BAR WATER COMPANY FOR WATER PIPES REC. AUGUST 31, 1960 REG. IN BK. �Z / / h o / - / , / 20' 0' �- 6 / ' / / / / s-/' 6s' \ / i \ �° V o° 0-962, PAGE 305, O.R. AND REC. DATE.- AUGUST 10, 1964 AS /NST No. 3417, O.R. �0 675 / O� / - -'� / / iO LOT �' o / ��' / �O >9 / / s,.�j 1, R 15 15 , / o w� O / i �o , /� z9 d 7W[ ,18 /i $ SURVEYORS NOTE 0" CURB DETAIL -- - �p // / / /s, 8 O2 > r 0 P / , EASEMENT FOLLOWS THECENTERLINE OF DIAMOND BAR BLVD., NO WIDTH /S GIVEN NTS / �� L0�3 O / I ` /O , / / �/� >>2 o- / , s /'o • / c / 1 .I , / 2 �`� IN THE DOCUMENT. ` ARK O . �, ^ h .� / 3 5 g1' , 15 • / , r 6 , 2 / L 54 /, 3' BROW X25 (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) 3 ' O ' / / ♦ \ 8 , / Q' 1. , , ,1 I/ / Q �` ^> i DITCH, TYP 30 �O� / � /, � 1 a � � > � / � LEGAL DESCRIPTION ss � � ❑ EASEMENT TO THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FOR SANITARY SEWER PURPOSES REC. NOVEMBER 11, 1971 C � / � / .• / r 7 O• / .• .• � � . •�r i / o� " � Ac 1`O � 4 R� 10/I� / 0 / ,c / 6 3 Nl / / / / / > �, ♦/ / / `� 9- / c�/ , X18 O1°' // 35 AS INSL 3366, O.R.. BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 29 TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 9 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO E 4 : / 1 � -� \ - / � 10 > >/ 7 � /rr. / . • / 60 � / � / ®�\ 6 RTWL P �O L>' /j'\`°`L '� $ ° ^ O � 4 EXISTING / / / P / ri s� / p I}0 / , p \ �j �\ 3 / �/ a� �e> x MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, COUTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. \ / �L / h EASEMENT TO THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FOR STORM DRAIN INGRESS AND EGRESS REC, DATE. UNDERGROUND l / / / /ti /�' / he ..�` 0 �5 ,15 �' 115 / \ / / / a5 w / SURFACE FLOWS / / 1 I / �`� - / ��, p1 / / P / ,1 / 5 . ♦ �. 6 , r Q / a > �, A / �O i l / / ,� / / O / l �., ,1 / , /,� P �, 6 d \ S / p3 i go , ' P oL 1�o� Q / 01 / / ° \ 1 5 / / /� a �5 MAY 18, 1982 AS INST. 82-508759, O. R. 670 / ETRE a 7 2o ti 719 5 Q 5 P , s G� STATEMENT OF OWNERSHIP 26' o /'� v l 7 / • / ,�0 sem' ' `��G X169 �y� / Dr � v �� / /'� p a51.3 I --I 1 ^ / I �' ^O l \ P ; �� , Z \ /ij' �� '< 8�° X °° TREES 60X70 O L O T Q• I I ��--- �S, // 6 cPo ,15 s \ �(p G�4 / / \\ O, 4110", �F 9 F _ _ _ > C P P \ > ° I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED UNDER MY I \� / 8 �, O �\ \ L / X FESS rr`� / / ^ 3.1 ss / �, / > Og. / / 550 �`L c� �j2 �,> \\ �5_ _ //i c�GP \ / \ _ / SINGLE FAM/L Y SUPERVISION AND THAT THE OWNER OF RECORD HAS KNOWLEDGE Quo i0� - - J V I / \ <v <v / �1 / ,1 8 O \ cP co 1 0 \ �/ \ _ - - / 0 ( � � OF AND CONSENTS TO THE FILING OF THIS MAP. \ Dh > / \ /'�� Y' 1 Q O >> Q /. ,/ •� ,�0�%� 5 5 ,`c�� \ e oP' \�\ 2� /. / , \Q' / TREES \ �C. ti V� \ 'L) A+ % �j9,, 3 �`' o ' O -� / ° /•' / 5 \ �10 6 l , / x POOL \ / i `' \� �,, / P,155' Y `e j S PT ] �� ] 7S, ` \ \10 / \� I ` 690 -- /' ' / s 60 o. s / o� ^ ^ _ 18' DITCH; TY FIRE TRUCK 670. �, , / \ o �z o �� ��� �30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK Qq v II S , 2' / x / h� A P 155 P �16 / �`c�h ` ^ TURNING RADIUS DETAIL . 81.4 I 236: °' A r- / �••.- - r- NTS 7,,r ?A .. r ��, ��� -1 � o , �,�6, _ _ � , 7 8.05 � J N � O �6, / � � ^ cp0,, - - , , �} POOL , f .� --�8 I: P 3 �� �c , �� ° 6� �o s �.,, �h rr?r� (,r \J� EXISr�I \ ^°/ �• �. r ,.N /' I cn ,� SS ESMr \ �p `V ` , " \� '� ' �� ' w'. \ ' • '-- � S9' 6o P,155' �. ` `� ^ � \ �, �n 6°` O ♦ cP0_ ^ I /%, /760 // -F 682.1 \ I POOL 68. - \ - - \ -- - \ A \s // 16�• \ /� l/ / \ x o �S� o \ >Qo.. \ \ 6p w -' 21 ♦ / l ' i / ISO TYPICAL STREET SECTIONS- \ / I 685.7 hz., x Op 25 ^ 15 6 610 !i DI H, lYP r- r1r-+� SERVICE ROAD AND V - - ° �1P •z `^ ° �O 6 Q%1 /, a rr�r� r r\�� �:�J�3J PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ONLY - - 2 �� �• \ ,156 s Q \ f . 2 EMERGENCY R/W R/W o . \ \ \ !k - �� /, / TRE 85, /v INGRESS/EGRESS \ s 0 TREES 3.6P%158'TYP / 5' I 5 / \ x VARIES 8' 25' 14 26 S' 8' VARIES \ O/ �� 68° J c\ LANDSCAPE MEDIAN LANDSCAPE Q ` �� \ 3' TOE DITCH, TYP _ _ \ \ �6 ` moi' O soo.4 \ I cv \ 5 j ii x 12 EASEMENT \ 1 \ �^"� 21 \ rn �O` ,1 1' tw p`l it i / 8' EASEMENT `� / ~ I ^ \ .�$ i �' / 2' 14. 14.0' 2' 0,5' EASEMENT 0.5' 2' 12.0 2' 9'r 2.09 2.09 2.0% 2'\ � / � \ \ '•. - O� � `�'' / 2.0% ��, 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK �� S��P s �P\� i / 0.5' 0.5' EES 5 a S 4PX 5' SIDEWALK �5' SIDEWALK � � �� � � M 5 PARKWAY 6" CURB 5' PARKWAY - EMERGENCY $ \\ \ °- / / I 2 / �qX 2.0% 2 I 2 /� \ ` 1 z / INGRESS/EGRESS / �P� 2/ �P / 6" CURB &GUTTER 6" CURB &GUTTER 39 �- \ 1 4i \ A \ / 2' qI SWALE SWALE 2 X SECTION A -A \ \ `ro s� $ i �'/ 5 \\ Al' BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM c� No. 59089 M DATE EDWARD A. MANDICH s�TFOFICA��F°��\P MAP DATE IDENTIFIER DATE Of LATEST CHANGE TO THIS MAP 07/30/13 BY: LP DATE OF THIS PLOT 09/19/13 1 NUMBER OF UNITS Summary of Areas PROVIDED COVERED (2 PER UNIT) Lot No. S.F Acres Lot No. S.F Acres 6 7,867 0.181 30 5,127 0.118 7 5,295 0.122 31 6,674 0.153 8 4,945 0.114 32 6,329 0.145 9 4,928 0.113 33 5,346 0.123 10 5,140 0.118 34 4,408 0.101 11 4,857 0.111 35 4,235 0.097 12 4,761 0.109 36 4,227 0.097 13 7,033 0.161 37 4,230 0.097 14 4,902 0.113 38 4,232 0.097 15 4,646 0.107 39 4,462 0.102 16 4,328 0.099 40 4,652 0.107 17 4,682 0.107 41 4,715 0.108 18 7,473 0.172 42 4,924 0.113 19 6,095 0.14 43 5,159 0.118 20 5,022 0.115 44 5,347 0.123 21 5,214 0.12 45 5,297 0.122 22 5,731 0.132 46 5,683 0.13 23 5,419 0.124 47 4,169 0.096 24 7,196 0.165 48 4,808 0.11 25 4,577 0.105 49 5,911 0.136 26 5,214 0.12 50 5,466 0.125 27 5,631 0.129 51 4,645 0.107 28 6,414 0.147 52 5,160 0.118 29 4,763 0.109 c� No. 59089 M DATE EDWARD A. MANDICH s�TFOFICA��F°��\P MAP DATE IDENTIFIER DATE Of LATEST CHANGE TO THIS MAP 07/30/13 BY: LP DATE OF THIS PLOT 09/19/13 1 721.1 r r i Y - R/I F "A" /IIEL/ R/W I R/W R/W I R/W NORTHERLY SOUTHERLY x RIGHT-OF-WAY TO �o �� �0� �� AC BERM TOTAL GROSS 247,342 S.F. ENTR PO ONO S R W \, 54' R/W 54' R/W / I R/W BE DEDICATED TO THE ;r:.::. i \� ��i S / — 5.7 Ac. July 30, 2013 (PRIVATE) 46' R/W \ CITY of DIAMOND BAR �j 75.4 SECTION I -I SECTION J J SECTION K -K DATE �22.4� ` � x � EMERGENCY ACCESS ROAD SERVICE ACCESS ROAD PEDESI MN/SERVICE ACCESS ROAD AVERAGE GROSS 5,263 S.F. W O 27.0 27.0' 27.0 27.0' \ % .i : - 1855-162AX R/W 84 , R/W 5 I 5 VARIES VARIES 8' 5' 20' 24' 20' 5' 8' 2' LANDSCAPE MEDIAN LANDSCAPE ?/ I r 1 ttPX ��r 2.09 2.09 2.0% 2.0% 2' 5' SIDEWALK/ `RETAINING WALL 6" CURB 5' SIDEWALK 5' PARKWAY 5' PARKWAY 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER SECTION B -B ENTRY - PORTION OF "A" STREET (PRIVATE) 50' 50' 8' 42' 4' 35' 1 3• L 09 Tr CURB � 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER- S' SIDEWALK SECTION L -L EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) 1 9.0' 36' 9.0'1 14' 5' 18' 18' 5' 4'I 2' P W 8, 8, KW 2' x P RKI RKI 2.1 M � 2 / 4LK � � SIDEWALK CURB & CURB & GUTTER GUTTER SECTION C -C "A" STREET - LOCAL STREET PARKING BOTH SIDES (PRIVATE) 1 14.0' 26' 14.0' 1 14' 10' 13' 13' 10' 4'1 2' PKWY PKWY 2' GUTTER GUTTER SECTION D -D "A" STREET - LOCAL STREET (`TAPER) NO PARKING (PRIVATE) r PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I R/W R/W R R/w R/W 112' I 00 50' 54' I 50' 1 50' I 8' 8' 42' 8' 4' 42' 8'I 18' 35' 4' 45' 811 I 1 I 3' 0% 2.09 1 2.0% 2.09 2.0% ?!Tm t 6" CURB & GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK/ CURB 6" CURB & GUTTER " PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK 6 CURB &GUTTER 6" CURB &GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK SECTION L -L SECTION M -M PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) 23.0 23.0 tivr%D IX l..Dl,D IX GUTTER SECTION E—E GUTTER "B" STREET - L�AL STREET PARKING BOTH SIDES (PRIVATE) x o. o<....:. LO 55 o / /\� 720.6 X 17 / \ ►' 720 Q 725.1^V + X +/ POOL S tA (- PROPOSED R/W 1 IMPROVEMENTS R/W 18 I 50, 1 60, 1 8' 8' 35' 4' 63' 1 1 3, 3' I X P 2.09 I 2.0% 2:1 M I CURB L � PROPOSED 6" CURB & GUTTER RETAINING WALL 6" CURB &GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK SECTION M -M PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) R/W 100 R/W 50' 50' 8' 35' 4 35' 8' I 2.09 2.0% 6" CURB 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK SECTION N -N EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) 0 3o FEET1zo 29.7 AC. ± GROSS AREA DENSITY SUMMARY CONTOUR INTERVALCkc 5 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED (60x70) ° 1/2 INCHES 2 TOTAL LOTS 63 0 W 35' 32' 31.75' NUMBER AREA DENSITY OF UNITS (ACRES) (DU/ACRE) Q Q Q Q Q Q ; 47 5.7 8.2 4' c� FL 28' 4' 3° c� FL 28 FL 19' 2.875' o FL 26' 2.875 MIN. TRAVEL MIN. MIN. TRAVEL PARKING MIN. TRAVEL IN. 20% 2.0% } 2.0% 4 R u 8) o" CURB 4" Ro URB 6" CURB 4 ROLLED0"o" cuRe DENSITY SUMMARY DENSITY SUMMARY SECTION F -F SECTION G -G SECTION H—H MULTI -FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDO PRIVATE STREET PRIVATE STREET TYPICAL PRIVATE DRIVE NUMBER AREA DENSITY NUMBER AREA DENSITY PREPARED FOR: PREPARED B Y: (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) AND RRE LANE OF UNITS (ACRES) (DU/ACRE) OF UNITS (ACRES) (DU/ACRE) (PRIVATE) 62 33 18.8 73 5.9 12.4 OWNER. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS �►I F- � PROPOSED F- � PROPOSED I I 1 IMPROVEMENTS 1 IMPROVEMENTS /W I 06 I I R/W R/W R/W R/W 92 I R/W 80 50' I 1 56' I 40' 40' 40' 1 52, 1 I 8' 42' I 4' I 41' 1 8' 3' 8' 32' 32' 8' 18' 32' 44' 1 8'1 MEDT N I 3' I 1 1 I I I I 1 I I \ MPX I I 2.0% 2' 2.0% 2.09 1 2.0% 2.09 2. D% PROPOSED CURB L RETAINING WALL 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER L 6" CURB & GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB &GUTTER EXISTING 8' SIDEWALK 8' SIDEWALK PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK SECTION N -N SECTION 0-0 SECTION 0-0 PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. EXISTING BREA GSW YON ROAD PROPOSED BREA CANYON ROAD (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) PARKING SUMMARY - SINGLE FAMILY NUMBER OF UNITS REQUIRED PROVIDED COVERED (2 PER UNIT) GUEST (1/3 PER UNIT) COVERED (2 PER UNIT) GUEST TOTALS 47 94 32 94 185 7.2213 FIRE AND PLANNING LP DATE REVISION BY 721.1 r r i Y - R/I F "A" /IIEL/ R/W I R/W R/W I R/W NORTHERLY SOUTHERLY x RIGHT-OF-WAY TO �o �� �0� �� AC BERM TOTAL GROSS 247,342 S.F. ENTR PO ONO S R W \, 54' R/W 54' R/W / I R/W BE DEDICATED TO THE ;r:.::. i \� ��i S / — 5.7 Ac. July 30, 2013 (PRIVATE) 46' R/W \ CITY of DIAMOND BAR �j 75.4 SECTION I -I SECTION J J SECTION K -K DATE �22.4� ` � x � EMERGENCY ACCESS ROAD SERVICE ACCESS ROAD PEDESI MN/SERVICE ACCESS ROAD AVERAGE GROSS 5,263 S.F. W O 27.0 27.0' 27.0 27.0' \ % .i : - 1855-162AX R/W 84 , R/W 5 I 5 VARIES VARIES 8' 5' 20' 24' 20' 5' 8' 2' LANDSCAPE MEDIAN LANDSCAPE ?/ I r 1 ttPX ��r 2.09 2.09 2.0% 2.0% 2' 5' SIDEWALK/ `RETAINING WALL 6" CURB 5' SIDEWALK 5' PARKWAY 5' PARKWAY 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER SECTION B -B ENTRY - PORTION OF "A" STREET (PRIVATE) 50' 50' 8' 42' 4' 35' 1 3• L 09 Tr CURB � 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER- S' SIDEWALK SECTION L -L EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) 1 9.0' 36' 9.0'1 14' 5' 18' 18' 5' 4'I 2' P W 8, 8, KW 2' x P RKI RKI 2.1 M � 2 / 4LK � � SIDEWALK CURB & CURB & GUTTER GUTTER SECTION C -C "A" STREET - LOCAL STREET PARKING BOTH SIDES (PRIVATE) 1 14.0' 26' 14.0' 1 14' 10' 13' 13' 10' 4'1 2' PKWY PKWY 2' GUTTER GUTTER SECTION D -D "A" STREET - LOCAL STREET (`TAPER) NO PARKING (PRIVATE) r PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I R/W R/W R R/w R/W 112' I 00 50' 54' I 50' 1 50' I 8' 8' 42' 8' 4' 42' 8'I 18' 35' 4' 45' 811 I 1 I 3' 0% 2.09 1 2.0% 2.09 2.0% ?!Tm t 6" CURB & GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK/ CURB 6" CURB & GUTTER " PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK 6 CURB &GUTTER 6" CURB &GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK SECTION L -L SECTION M -M PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) 23.0 23.0 tivr%D IX l..Dl,D IX GUTTER SECTION E—E GUTTER "B" STREET - L�AL STREET PARKING BOTH SIDES (PRIVATE) x o. o<....:. LO 55 o / /\� 720.6 X 17 / \ ►' 720 Q 725.1^V + X +/ POOL S tA (- PROPOSED R/W 1 IMPROVEMENTS R/W 18 I 50, 1 60, 1 8' 8' 35' 4' 63' 1 1 3, 3' I X P 2.09 I 2.0% 2:1 M I CURB L � PROPOSED 6" CURB & GUTTER RETAINING WALL 6" CURB &GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK SECTION M -M PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) R/W 100 R/W 50' 50' 8' 35' 4 35' 8' I 2.09 2.0% 6" CURB 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK SECTION N -N EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) 0 3o FEET1zo 29.7 AC. ± GROSS AREA DENSITY SUMMARY CONTOUR INTERVALCkc 5 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED (60x70) ° 1/2 INCHES 2 TOTAL LOTS 63 0 W 35' 32' 31.75' NUMBER AREA DENSITY OF UNITS (ACRES) (DU/ACRE) Q Q Q Q Q Q ; 47 5.7 8.2 4' c� FL 28' 4' 3° c� FL 28 FL 19' 2.875' o FL 26' 2.875 MIN. TRAVEL MIN. MIN. TRAVEL PARKING MIN. TRAVEL IN. 20% 2.0% } 2.0% 4 R u 8) o" CURB 4" Ro URB 6" CURB 4 ROLLED0"o" cuRe DENSITY SUMMARY DENSITY SUMMARY SECTION F -F SECTION G -G SECTION H—H MULTI -FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDO PRIVATE STREET PRIVATE STREET TYPICAL PRIVATE DRIVE NUMBER AREA DENSITY NUMBER AREA DENSITY PREPARED FOR: PREPARED B Y: (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) AND RRE LANE OF UNITS (ACRES) (DU/ACRE) OF UNITS (ACRES) (DU/ACRE) (PRIVATE) 62 33 18.8 73 5.9 12.4 OWNER. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS �►I F- � PROPOSED F- � PROPOSED I I 1 IMPROVEMENTS 1 IMPROVEMENTS /W I 06 I I R/W R/W R/W R/W 92 I R/W 80 50' I 1 56' I 40' 40' 40' 1 52, 1 I 8' 42' I 4' I 41' 1 8' 3' 8' 32' 32' 8' 18' 32' 44' 1 8'1 MEDT N I 3' I 1 1 I I I I 1 I I \ MPX I I 2.0% 2' 2.0% 2.09 1 2.0% 2.09 2. D% PROPOSED CURB L RETAINING WALL 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER L 6" CURB & GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB &GUTTER EXISTING 8' SIDEWALK 8' SIDEWALK PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK SECTION N -N SECTION 0-0 SECTION 0-0 PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. EXISTING BREA GSW YON ROAD PROPOSED BREA CANYON ROAD (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) PARKING SUMMARY - SINGLE FAMILY NUMBER OF UNITS REQUIRED PROVIDED COVERED (2 PER UNIT) GUEST (1/3 PER UNIT) COVERED (2 PER UNIT) GUEST TOTALS 47 94 32 94 185 * INCLUDES ON -STREET PARKING AND 2 GUEST SPACES IN DRIVEWAY PARKING SUMMARY - MULTI -FAMILY NUMBER OF UNITS REQUIRED PROVIDED COVERED (2 PER UNIT) GUEST (1/3 PER UNIT) COVERED (2 PER UNIT) GUEST TOTALS 135 270 90 270 105 LENNAR 0 25 ENTERPRISE ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656 (949) 349-8100 HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES I R V I N E , I N C . PLANNING ENGINEERING SURVEYING Three Hughes Irvine, CA 92618 FX: (949) 583-0759 PH: (949) 583-1010 WILLOW HEIGHTS VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 72295 F: \0718\Planning\OA-Project\TTM\0718P-TTM.dw ELEVATION 'A' D FLAN ENLARO EMENT @ GLU57ER HOMES 5GALE: I'' = IO' -O" ELE\\,IAT I ON - 'A' SCALE: I " 101-011 A FLONERI NO EVEROREEN OROUNC� C. -,OVER: - HDMEROGALL I S TRAGHELOSi ERR'-- M SENEG10 - ORNAMENTAL O RASSES. EVEROREEN SHRUF35: - ESGALLON I A - LIOU5TRUM RAFHIOLEFI5 - GALLI57EMON RHAMNUS. LOPHOSTEMON FERI ME7ER NA OPEN LA �. ohT I NO FLAN ENLAROEMENT @ FOG<E7 FAR< SCALE: I'' = 10'-O" en n ice+ irr r -- - 5ENGH SEAT I NO ti r 'T I /'1 k I I rn I t GC,R . t: I " = 10'-0 " SGALF.: I'' - 200'-0" )CGKET PA E ENL? 15 SHEE CLUSTER HOMES P / / SEE ENLARO EMF -NT, THIS SHFF-T LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENTS - #5 - CLUS'T'ER HOME PRODUCT & POCKET PARK PREPARED FOR.- LENNAR 0 25 ENTERPRISE ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656 (949) 349-8100 PREPARED BY. - DESIGN GROUP 31591 Camino Capistrano San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 www.RJMdesigngroup.com [949] 493-2690 fax [949] 493-2600 WILL 0 W HEIGHTS TEN TA T1 VE TRACT PROJECT PROF/LES (VERTICAL & HORIZONTAL SCALE: V" 60') VIEW PROFILE #1 VIEW PROFILE #4 LEGEND - NATURAL GROUND DESIGN GROUND 2 PROPOSED GRADING Boo- 760- 720- 680- 640 oo760720680640 s0o BDo- -760 760- 720 USED NING WALL PROJECT BOUNDARY LINE -Boo LOT LINE - - EASEMENT LINE CENTERLINE OPOSE E WALLA" �W PROPOSED WATER s PROPOSED SEWER 720 LP PROPOSED ST. BY > WIN XISTIN k=pl ml ,� lo°e \ -------------------------------- OPOSE " 8" ST. P !OPOSED -------------- 6.0' PRO SED ADE 00 Lots -' PROPO ED GRADE EME PROPOSED Lot 10 SE WA L BLVD. --- A" ST. Pad 7082' ( - EXI TING G DE ---- vmt m - LI 1 1 Lot 1 EXIS ING GRADE _ o Lot 39 - - PR POSED MSE WALL \ Pad=771 PROP A" SED T ad=774.. Lot 2 'P - ----------- ------- rypi -_- S. DIAMOND BAR -'- OPOSE Pa =727"5 PROPOSED "A" BLVD. Lot 4 PacII25' Pa Lot 14 "B"ST. p pi _ Lot S . �> R P PR SED PR P SED AINING WALL ��\-p OPOSE RETAIN NG W PR L POSED GRADE mi0i kp f PRO OSED ACCESS AC ESS ACC S Lot O ROPOSD MSE ALL --- ---_ ---- ---- ---- - -- _ ---- ---- ---- ---- ------------- ---- > STING a ARK XIS ---- --------- d=7083 Pad- 08.6' pad=7 7.8* Pad= 07.4' BREA BREA RAIN RDEN P (STING GROUN g N. RD. HA PARK ASIN Lot 1 L t 1 Lot L 1 p s0o BDo- -760 760- 720 - 840 USED NING WALL PROJECT BOUNDARY LINE -Boo LOT LINE - - EASEMENT LINE CENTERLINE OPOSE E WALLA" �W PROPOSED WATER s PROPOSED SEWER 720 LP PROPOSED ST. BY > WIN XISTIN k=pl ml ,� lo°e \ -------------------------------- OPOSE " 8" ST. P !OPOSED -------------- 6.0' PRO SED ADE 00 Lots -' el EME PRIC Lot 10 - 840 USED NING WALL PROJECT BOUNDARY LINE -Boo LOT LINE - - EASEMENT LINE CENTERLINE OPOSE E WALLA" �W PROPOSED WATER s PROPOSED SEWER 720 LP 720 T 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 SD PROPOSED STORM DRAIN 5RWL RETAINING WALL/ 680 RETAINING WALL HEIGHT TOP OF SLOPE V -DITCH 640 Trr?ACT ATO. 2il5DDi MSE WALL 40 80 120 760 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680 720 760 800 840 880 920 960 7000 7040 7080 1120 7760 7200 7240 1280 7320 1360 7400 7440 7480 7520 7560 1600 \ / ':\ \ A VIEW PROFILE #2 ° — — — / PROPOSED 8' _ � Y ° / SIDEWALK d % VICINITY MAP - - - - NATURAL GROUND PROPOSED GRADING \\ \ EX. POWER POLE 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK -_ 800 \ \ tT TO BE RELOCATED �// 160- 720 680 ENHANCED PAVEMENT NOTES 760\ / \�\ AREA TO BE DEDICATED TO 1. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 8714-002-900, 8714-002-901, 8714-002-902, /A �\ O EX R/w THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 8714-002-903 AND 8714-015-901. A EX. CURB � � g g, Aa V o1T0 o A \/ ,A PROPOSED CURB 720 \ \ / \ `\\ / o PROPOSED R/W r� �� ^� �zR/N' \ ^ i i \� Cut 2 EXISTING &PROPOSED ZONING: SITE D SPECIFIC PLAN \\�EXIS77NG 8" SEI}ER/ \ \ \\\ .��� / \ y/ $ - / l Fill C ILL LINE 3. EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT I / I UT F r \ / EX SIGNAGE 70 BE _ 41 \ /+Tvq / l \ \ \ \ �/ / TO BE RELOCiATE�D 13y p W6 \�\ ! l e I 4. PROPOSED LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL 680 \ �.i / e �t9 r yJ l �\... F. H. FIRE HYDRANT \ y g /^N Z \ 5. EXISTING & PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN: SPECIFIC PLAN, SITE D. 0 40 80 120 180 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680 720 760 800 840 880 920 960 1000 1040 1080 1120 CONNECT 70 r EX. 10" ACP WATER - j8 -j \'$ G, ' 13p 135 24 \\\ TFlrl rT /id ;�z�SEWER DRAIN LOW PLOW 7i 1 6. ALL STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND GRADING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE �, / VIEW PROFILE #3 \ / m \� EXIS NG $" -SEWER /`,BPR r ` psl \\ 1\\ x A s WITH DIAMOND BAR STANDARDS, ORDINANCES AND APPROVED MODIFICATIONS HERETO. / A w p 5 RT a \ d Iva, 87'3, PIGS 5J TO -5 DIVERSION STRUCTURE - NATURAL GROUND PROPOSED GRADING r �1 PROPOSED MEDIAN \� O. / ^ 11'1- 5 \" (\ 1740 ---- \ \\ 7. ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD SHALL BE ACCOMMODATED ON THE FINAL DESIGN OR 760 720 680 oa oCe p PROPOSED P OPOSE E WALLA" 7.2213 FIRE AND PLANNING LP PROPOSED ST. BY > 0O XISTIN k=pl ml ,� lo°e \ -------------------------------- OPOSE " 8" ST. P !OPOSED -------------- 6.0' PRO SED ADE ---- Lots -' el PRIC Lot 10 BLVD. --- A" ST. Pad 7082' = EXI TING G DE ---- vmt m - LI 1 1 Lot 1 ENHANCED PAVEMENT NOTES 760\ / \�\ AREA TO BE DEDICATED TO 1. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 8714-002-900, 8714-002-901, 8714-002-902, /A �\ O EX R/w THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 8714-002-903 AND 8714-015-901. A EX. CURB � � g g, Aa V o1T0 o A \/ ,A PROPOSED CURB 720 \ \ / \ `\\ / o PROPOSED R/W r� �� ^� �zR/N' \ ^ i i \� Cut 2 EXISTING &PROPOSED ZONING: SITE D SPECIFIC PLAN \\�EXIS77NG 8" SEI}ER/ \ \ \\\ .��� / \ y/ $ - / l Fill C ILL LINE 3. EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT I / I UT F r \ / EX SIGNAGE 70 BE _ 41 \ /+Tvq / l \ \ \ \ �/ / TO BE RELOCiATE�D 13y p W6 \�\ ! l e I 4. PROPOSED LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL 680 \ �.i / e �t9 r yJ l �\... F. H. FIRE HYDRANT \ y g /^N Z \ 5. EXISTING & PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN: SPECIFIC PLAN, SITE D. 0 40 80 120 180 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680 720 760 800 840 880 920 960 1000 1040 1080 1120 CONNECT 70 r EX. 10" ACP WATER - j8 -j \'$ G, ' 13p 135 24 \\\ TFlrl rT /id ;�z�SEWER DRAIN LOW PLOW 7i 1 6. ALL STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND GRADING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE �, / VIEW PROFILE #3 \ / m \� EXIS NG $" -SEWER /`,BPR r ` psl \\ 1\\ x A s WITH DIAMOND BAR STANDARDS, ORDINANCES AND APPROVED MODIFICATIONS HERETO. / A w p 5 RT a \ d Iva, 87'3, PIGS 5J TO -5 DIVERSION STRUCTURE - NATURAL GROUND PROPOSED GRADING r �1 PROPOSED MEDIAN \� O. / ^ 11'1- 5 \" (\ 1740 ---- \ \\ 7. ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD SHALL BE ACCOMMODATED ON THE FINAL DESIGN OR 760 720 680 840 < / o / ^ --"""' 3 / Poli \\ ,139.5 \ \\ Nva MP -40 MEDIA FILTER THEY SHALL BE EITHER QUITCLAIMED, ABANDONED OR RELOCATED TO THE 1 n \\ vc\ p \ \ % SATISFACTION OF ALL INTERESTED PARTIES. DRAINAGE AND PUBLIC UTILITY EX SIGNAGE TO BE - /x'!= - 'd �.� \ \ �y r rm\ TO BE RELOCATED /p , _y 305 73 0 \�\ \u\\\ �� TREATMENT BMP EASEMENTS NECESSARY TO SERVE THIS PROJECT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE Boo 71RAL7 J'k I0t'JY� \ _ ^^ y -� - sl t m\ I CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AND WITH THE UTILITY PURVEYORS. EXISTING STORM DRAIN ` j \ o r --& Id PtiS -� p \N\\ ps1}99 i \S NATURAL AREA TO - (� EASEMENTS WILL BE ABANDONED DURING THE FINAL MAP PROCEDURES. BE PRESERVED PROPOSED SIGNAL / " /.91111 A 'o\ psl 1 �i o� �� o -_ / / I )�I S. MULTI FAMILY BUILDING TO MEET NFPA 13 STANDARDS. •' \ y }0� \ `nom �i I CONNECT TO EXISTING ••VA/ o \ _ zB0 \ t0" ACP WATER � v � _ I EX/ST/NG EASEMENTS 9. ESTIMATED EARTHWORK QUANTITIES: 415,500 LYS. CUT, 415,500 LYS. FILL. ps136 12 5 � 1 N 3,¢ pR 1NUFY 10. SEWER SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION \ M U R O2 EASEMENT 70 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES DISTRICT. 6 \5 p 871g. _ REC FEBRUARY 8, 1954 /N BOOK 43774, PAGE 241, UR 720 � - \ ' W - s \ r?2 " �f / / \ � , P' R` � � d� M � ;95 I \\ WPtV 11. PER LA COUNTY FIRM PANEL 1880 OF 2350. / 30' LANDS PES a 5Ir pslil5 -I 2 \ 1199 �fi>,r''j/ 2' pol \ m \o p5E ZER O3 EASEMENT TO GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, A CORPORATION ,9- \V ps13g5 \ -- '� FOR POLE LINES REC APRIL 28, 1954 /N BOOK 44446, PAGE 33 0R 12. PRIVATE WATER QUALITY BMP'S TO BE MAINTAINED BY H.O.A. / \2 a \ CV 6Bo � ,0•V1 � � C G � `vl I sltg9 2. "�. p a � app \\\\ \\... O6 EASEMENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR STORM GRAIN PURPOSES AS SHOWN ON TRACT No. 27577 REC IN 13. LOTS 62 & 63 ARE TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR &MAINTAINED 4 16 .0. " \ P s1'L1S9 // sl BY THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 A80 520 560 600 640 680 720 760 800 840 880 920 / - t 6 :�, \ \ p / E P \ \ \ BK 702, PGS. 22 70 25 INCLUSIVE OF MAPS RECORDS LOS ANGELES COUNTY. /To SIGNAGE TO BE 5 \ i t l TO BE RELOCATED �-I- � � % � 0 ®e S _� \ \ 0 6 MSE I \qea i \� �-1�' _ - - O EASEMENT 70 THE PUBLIC FOR WATER PIPELINES REC. AUGUST 31, 7960 AS INSL No. 3278, IN BK; 14. ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG DIAMOND BAR BLVD,. BREA CANYON RD AND -1 RIGHT-OF-WAY TO / o 0 0 _ o \� ^� ps11%' ps1 \ \ Ps -- _L _ _ _ _ PASADO DR. TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. / / I TR ICT 1117 _15DT.�l o'•� BE DEDICATED TO THE -F - � R°' " �'Psj1 \\\\ PsJA s1�5 \ \\ NO PAGE 305, OR. SURVEYORS N07E.' EASEMENT FOLLOWS THE CENTERLINE OF DIAMOND BAR BTW, / I CITY OF DIAMOND BAR a 2d \ 5c 1� l 6 0 - p l NO W/DTH IS GIVEN IN THE DOCUMENT 15. ALL TRASH 15 INDIVIDUAL PICK UP BY WASTE MANAGEMENT. TRASH PICK UP FOR i / $ / g -'� �5 �'a I sT6'\� g�+ .5 \ \ \ \ I, 17 EASEMENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR STREET PURPOSES AS SHOWN ON TRACT No. 25989 REC. IN BK 714, LOTS 2 THROUGH 5 NEEDS TO BE LOCATED ON "B'• STREET. TRASH PICK UP FOR EX.- 12' ACP WATER " 1`' -• P o, Q.' 10 \ s ?,i756.5 s13 \ ) 405 1 ro 1� gRUw P LOT 1 WILL BE ALONG THE LOOP ALLEY. m. ,p eb \ J 4a� . j ( P 2 • 01 p PGS 5 70 7 OF MAPS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY / /TO�BE RELOCATED _ EASEMENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR STORM DRAINS AND SANITARY SEWER AS SHOWN ON TRACT NO. 27577 16, LOTS 1-5 TO BE MAPPED FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES. r PROPOSED MEDIA m. / 'CUi Iyy. '� \ �.. ,-1gp \. o \� \ ps136 P' s \\\\ 111 .. \ \ BETPRESER ED URAL AREA TO EX POWER POLE/ oVfl / ps113 g -, P \ \ 2' ps1115 \ �, 7 ? WqD\ \ . ^ \\- V I I I REC IN BK 702, PGS 22 TO 25 INCLUSIVE OF MAPS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY. STORM DRAIN SYSTEM TO BE PRIVATE. 70 BE RELOCA� �'- -5 g0 n 141 V A Ps _V - ® EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN COUNT/ES GAS COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA FOR GAS PIPE LINES, LIGHT, POWER 6" 7.6" PROPOSED SIGNAL - a$ 1 ' ' Psl S / 186 V A A g0 _ ---- 18. EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED PER TREE SURVEY. C.F. PER PIAN 6" 12" 12" MODIFICATION CL - ,� FII( .1 - s1 \ 5 V l // A - PURPOSES REC FEBRUARY 17, 1964 REC AS INSL 3774, OR. W DIAMOND BAR BLVD 10" __ _ PROPOSED ft/Wi ,N --- � � � VA X1,3 � p A o � I p AVo A p�l� 1 & BREA CANYON RD. F o_- p 18 \ _ _ - �g 0 vv CUi a c ,2 AG V V v 5 x116 v i 61 V EASEMENT TO THE DIAMOND BAR WATER COMPANY FOR WATER PIPES REC AUGUST 31, 9960 REG. IN BK. 1-1/2 i,:, t PROPOSED EWA K i '' '� �' p i1 9` 185 V A 72 P I 3• A '� �' 168.5 s" V 0-962, PAGE 305, OR. AND REC. DATE: AUGUST 10, 1964 AS INST. No. 3417, OR R_ 1/2" R=3' .,,�; � � _ _ $ $ $ .. ` �� / i 0 AAVA 0� � ,1133 _ o !v Psl AV A � � 0 P ? SURVEYOR'S NOTE, EASEMENT FOLLOWS THECENTERLINE OF DIAMOND BAR BLVD., NO WIDTH IS GIVEN .. 12„W� 3 5 ti -_ _ EX R/W '- .. T ,1A�'. P hd� yF V . V A Ps 180 Ol 6 Pi188. 33 oa A IN THE DOCUMENT UTILITY 2 o c. s. TY AGENCIES .. � R=1/z• e :".,<;. FL R=1/2” - _ _ o _ -- 2,• -Ex cuee.�� �... ,..:':.: •t4 �111�1 2' vv ,� HIv ° v 5 v v v t.Z _ A W� TRASH: (SINGLE FAMILY HOMES) e v vv 1,1 1,8. vvl- - 8l? v ' • ' •->• _ EX. POKER POI - _ o� _ -- �- "r"' p s. 5 ` O 1 4' w Pz 9 \ aM . ' 6- . = 6a Pi1 NATURAL AREA 6 EASEMENT TO THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FOR SANITARY SEWER PURPOSES REC. NOVEMBER 11, 1971 WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WASTE MANAGEMENT INC. ' -• - - -.; ..: : ° iO BE RELOCATED 12 W-� tz W p_ _-- N _. /' v v , ? vy P ,s' �5! ov v��` 5 p=119 a- 35 6� U, ; BE PRESERVED 'i AS INST 3366, O.R. 271 S. BREA CANYON ROAD 13940 E. LIVE OAK AVE. A\ \ 1 q \ RE ps1 sp I V g' Y 1• l0 i '' - WALNUT, CA 91789 BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 •- . .:.:;:- .'.: / X23 - _- _ ___ j r ps. " 12 � ��-psl8 • - •- .. . - � � e- psl � � s8° S � 9 - V p �, � � / � 7 EASEMENT TO THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FOR STORM DRAIN, INGRESS AND EGRESS REC. DATE (909) 595-7554 (800) 266-7551 o \ ,9 .. , 36 MAY 982 AS INST. 82-508759, O.R. 5 _2 v v sL poP ' ,. v . v v �- p L, 2d' ,•• Z slp6' v v 11 32 " A A 6 TELEPHONE SERVICE: TRASH: FOR MULTI -FAMILY O RIGHT-OF-WAY TO ti 1 680 MP -40 �' TDRM IN P V 4'se \ l 1 4' R 9a i' 60 t,,p1 R3T H 18 1 BE DEDICATED TO THE EDTA FILTER 8 LOW FLOW X p� 6 6 s1 31 's V 1,51 , 1 A M V , v - 6 3 6 'o' �/ VERIZON VALLEY VISTA INC. ^ O Dll/ERSION 'o sl 1 - ,....r 6 b8 1a% •N 1 1 s" 1 5 8 P, 8 0 \ ` / / ✓{` 3' BROW�� /q G mrD 6, ry RB & GUM �ITY OF DI MOND BAR `a - EATMENT P To P p8 P - vv w P` 6 -1 �FII( CUi / UITCH, irP 1400 PHILLIPS RANCH RD. BALDW E. LIVE OAK AVE. 4 ROLLED CURB k GUTTER {.VI4U W� 4LI� d / - / � _ � -T G7uRE -' � � � <^ _ r \ � �q � � � 9 bd r i i � I �` POMONA, CA 91766 BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 7 / v -- _ a A p0.2 25 S ps1116 ��, vv ps1151 7 5 as4-y&r �� 1 : o �s� /c v sj855 �- 3 0 s /� / & _ ) ( (800) 483-5000 (800) 266-7551 NIS NTS `Fill / //' v v ° � P � /� z • _ >� 1 � " I (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) / '/ /Psl I/�s 1 �2 \ s1%61 3 r'/ r'3�., 0 o.uMp y \ \���� ps1134 v p j 60 r �5 r '`\ '( ELECTRIC SERVICE: CABLE N � T.1 I � ; I I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. TIME WARNER 013 51 �;,/ / P� ,1615 �.II _ 59 S�N DIMASG CA V91773 GLENDORA,OCAE96740 Ps114 \ s1 I e 1 N 1..i, NATURAL AREA To -.- �I (800) 655-4555 3' EX- US 9 e° / /// / \\ `'% o� �' 6�\ po71 69a i \ po1�'S i a s-�/ e2 P'1610 P'O I_ i o-7 BE PRESERVED l �I jT �1-+- �I POSTAL SERVICE: _ s, o \ r DI7C�E7YP - - _. 4 " „ \, 1'J �€ , .. ,r ! O GAS SERVICE: USPS GARAGE / /EX k/w 7i ��02/ / / A' o s" p ` 7 s1 ,' ps11 1 _ - 1 ,r / '> N1 0 A,5 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. DIAMOND SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BLVD. / 0 � o: DOOR EX POWER POLE r CU ym�•� 0`u s- / / a r. p ) o/ 5 t -'� ` �1 1919 S, STATE COLLEGE BLVD. DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 T AND U 6•• ANAHEIM, CA 92806 (800) 27 TILITIES PR POSED RB RF ^� / 4 a - l l ^/ �� �. m r 3 5-8777 CUN /W ^o �_ /� 2i 2� %MM 70 BE RELOCATED PROPOSED R ps1111 q 3 PEDESTRIAN / p 'r9� �i� ps185•rJ Bo �I \v �Dl'r > �, w- 1,2A 27-2200 SEWER SERVICE: (TR UNK LINES( (800) 4 ,i,• / T� / Opp // / 0f A / o 'z '•'. ps > /8 b�� / �' / o �s `< v s� ss: G `L^ .r -- SCHOOL DISTRICT: LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT WALNUT VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT 1955 WORKMAN MILL ROAD W4i a § / / / ! /•�o^ ,'17 880 SOUTH LEMON AVE. WHITTI(562)E6 CA 90607 06 SR\� P 1 i/ > / `. ,l 90 / �. 61 A \: �.. pot CI r i> _ \/ WALNUT. CA 91789 (562) 699-7411 / /o / h //��° 6/ / I // / /y. l / `> - 0 m. 16 / / Ams // > P, h3 ^ 6 a la polo- , \� 16o HE 93 _ /' SEWER SERVICE. (MAIN LINES) 0 3 I lob U CURB DETAIL / " / �`O�� h / // - 'r / / / 1` r ,153 , , r >. / a^ A'C r I LOS ANGELES COUNTY OF PUBLIC WORKS e / m. p' 2 �4 0 v r ri ) SEWER MAINTENANCE DISTRICT r Y r r 9� . s GUi NTS � < / / h O / � / Ic Zt / / / 'L 6 . \ � , r I (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) / / p 675 / O / / - "a / / >O LOT a' � `' \ O ^ - tS `P ' ° sz & 181 5 r r / 900 LHAM BR , NTCA g L0V 6.3 / 0 00 / / ��A. , r a �..., > P> \o r >' r .Q o , / -<<°. r .y _.. p r , ALHAMBRA. CA a �9 IPA / `O� o / 1 v r� / /y. $ r' ��C �/5� 6t �'Py' r 4. r / s>, q �� r L Jr'i sT 3' BROW / / J \ 4, / h / / 90i' 3K'- r r r s1� 2 I, r .\o Q J• y r er DITCH, TYP C / cslrII�.P�� a s> RTft ,o A o BENCH MARK s rlc� r 76 ' tia / q0 s 4 . FI 1 /._ // _ \ / / / �" '\� >> , r , Q NATURAL AREA TOi p XISTING / e� / e s> r 0- - 40 ('` - S h\ v , BE PRESERVED' LOS ANGELES COUNTY BENCHMARK NO. G 5073 ELEVATION: 726.809 DATUM: NAVD 88, B / U ERGROUNO / °' / / /'by ^° h 3 1• r/ Po 5 r 111.5 / ,ri 0� \ I \ 2005 ADJUSTMENT ti Fill @ e, b 26' r' / 0 / Pr. / R CE FLOWS �ry� 7a / ooP 61 I I/ M• / / / �0 r /b . BUY ^3P o _ mom, / "` RS f '\° i x18,.5 - -1 9 / i/ /_ 7 R r> Q o°j h n ,� h o / / �ti a>, r< P/ y DESCRIPTION: LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TAG IN EAST CURB OF DIAMOND BAR BLVD. 42.7 .FEET EAST OF CENTERLINE AND 95 FEET NORTH OF CENTERLINE OF �p�k4� /�' / �Q�OPGT CROOKED CREEK DRIVE. " �Q• I �- -- / / l>o C 1 r.. r 6 moo\ pot sP �b / /Y \� mss• - \ 11,2 'r PSI _ LEGAL DESCRIPTION I F / ^e As'x> 0�5 .a� 9j/g \✓ s>'r7 �, / po11 L \ �P c /� FlRE TRUCK ��� \ 6 — 5.oR = 1 :: N a 61 �.a 11 P/1 15 s e5 o106.Oss" J, s , s \ �. ' S� 0/ / e/ � BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 9 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO TURNING RADIUS DETAIL �� ^ — i a ' �5 s P A� 0 6 • ti / MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, GOUTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. J. 9, m �O � / ° EC /, c rr h .\9 ij 3' TOE .._ v - �✓�� � a1 � / �. V 690 7! OS ' � r' � '��+ '.a 0 60 0. 69 b.. � IB' r y0• �rii DITCFY TYP / 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK (/ 1 / / ,/ ry9 v 6, ?,1-- 16 v "rz^y - 9 r' / _ _ u 5o r STA TEMENT OF OWNERSHIP Tr�rIC7_ l�)Cl _,271v-77� o/ i ?7s s _I - 905 P'�O90 7 po1565 y N 5� w 9Y A - i �r / Ty rC I T IIID. <?11-19r) 1 HEREBY STATE THAT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED UNDER MY EpSNC .0 \/ SUPERVISION AND THAT THE OWNER OF RECORD HAS KNOWLEDGE h 68. /LP / �0 4 X160' Pot j NATURAL AREA TO OF AND CONSENTS TO THE FILING OF THIS MAP. 44 , 55 ESMT � RZ i BE PRESERVED 1l} 1 l r r \ p T��r , r I � P 0� 1 \ v mi.\ > � TYP/CAL STREET SECT/ONS / I NATURAL AREA TO \\ \ \^ \ oY \\\c \ ss' pol�so TeE FA IF 11 BE PRESERVED \ mop ` 25• 1S r`,�„ DITCH, TYP - 1 �� � � SERVICE ROAD ANo MO p,1 C _.. r / - / TRAC-r J` D, �JeJBr� PEDEsrRIAN AccrsS ONLY -_� ^ -&o 2.; . po1560 .s 'y0 / ' EMERGENCY -�j� /, s, 16 rn d ,0 3'B , i '`V• INGRLSS EGRESS > _ IT gg / _ � �r ITCH, TIC ^ b � 6//' �/ { ` _ 3' TOE DITCH, TYP _ 1 - 6 a NATUIRAL AREA TO BE PRESERVED 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK f � EMERGENCY 'INGREss/EGRESS 7•p �SSEC7T�ION A—A •%p NORTHERLY CL SOUTHERLY ENTRY ' PORTION OF "As STREET R/W R/W R/W R/W R/N' 46' R R/W \. RIGHT-OF-WAY TO 54' R/W 54' R/W 1W BE DEDICATED TO THE (PRIVATE)aTY� 61AMOND BAR 27.0' 27.0' 27.0' 27.0• 23.0' 23.0' r 1 9.0' 36' 9.0'1 I 14.0' 26' 14.0' I 36 5' 78' 18' S' 1V� 14' S' 18' 78' 5' 4'1 14, 10' 13' 13' f0' 411 p• g• g• p• 2' 2�R WY PKW 2WYI� ,,��PKW 2 2' PKWY PKWY 2, 0,�RKING P/IRKING / 81 RKIJc� RKInc�2^ V' 2v W 2� OOH• 2 D, 11 L �P SIDEWALK SIDEWALK SIDEWALK SIDEWALK SIDEWALK SIDEWALK Q rvmo i ruoo x SECTION B—B ENTRY • PORTION OF "A" STREET (PRIVATE) 1 50 50 I 8' 42' 4 35' 8' MDI N 3• I 2.0% - 2.09 Tim T IUr J9"� URB 6" CURB &GUTTER 6" CURB &GUTTER ' SIDEWALK SECTION L—L EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) WALL CURB & CURB & GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER SECTION E—E SECTION C—C SECTION D—D 'B' STREET - LOCAL STREET 'A' STREET - LOCAL STREET 'A' STREET IF LOCAL STREET (TAPER) PARKING BOTH SIDES PARKING BOTH SIDES NO PARKING (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) r PROPOSED NIEROWNENTS R/W 112' 1 50' I 54' I� 42' 8' 4' 42' 8'1 M DIiN I I I 1 _ I 2.0% ® CURR 6" CURB & GUTTER 8' SIL \-6" CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK -8' SIDEWALK SECTION L—L PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) 50' 50' 35' 4' 45' -6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER - SECTION M—M EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) r PROPOSED W R/W i NTPROVQIIN/S R/W 718' I 50' 60' I 8' 8' 35' 4' 63' I I 3• I M DIAN I -� 3' 207 I SOX s CURB L PROPOSED 8" CURB & GUTTERfi" CURB &GURETAINING WALL TTER 8' SIDEWALK PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK SECTION M—M PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) ' ?IF- `_ F. (-7-/ // i rL �• \\ a' ^O� 9-j515 N Ol' ti / - 8' EASEMENT 12' EASEM NT 2' 15.0' 2' \ \ i ' 2' 0.5• EASEMENT 0.5• ' 12.0' 2' 1$%'NATURAL A A `\05' 05' j62 0.5' BE- ESE ED0-tow \ \ \ 1:1 2''4 �2q1 11 ,T.,1 414-0 SWALE SWALE1 '✓"Y T, 8 / / / �\ AC BERM J AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM NATURAL AREA \ SECTION 1-1 SECTION J—J SECTION K—K / BEPRESERVED EMERGENCY ACCESS ROAD SERVICE ACCESS ROAD PEDESTRIAWSERVICE ACCESS ROAD 7 /v \ I (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) n / \ \)NATURAL AREA �/ ���55 0 0 o g E PRESERVED f0 ❑ 0 0 J 35' 32' 326' m 4• � FL Y8• y• 3• v FL pg• FL 19• 2.875' v FL 26' 2.875' MIN. TRAVEL MIN. MIN. TRAVEL PARKING MIN. TRAVEL MIN. 1 .ZQx Asx _.oz 4" ROLLED O" CURB d" ROLLED 6°CURB 4" ROLLED 0' CURB \\ GDR CURB DR SECTION F—F SECTION G—G SECTION H—H PRIVATE STREET PRIVATE STREET TYPICAL PRIVATE DRIVE (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) AND FlRE LANE (PRIVATE) PROPOSm IMPROVOORS DE rF►1 r PROPOSED r PROPOSED I I NMRO"ODS CE I NIPROWEMENTS 100' R/W RAV I 1 6' I R/IY R/W 80 REW R/W 92' I R/W 50' 50' 50' I 1 56' 1 40' 40' 40, 52' 35' 14' 35' 8' 8' 42' I 4' I 4/' 1 8' 3- 8' 32' 32' 8' II MEQ IAN I I M DI N I 8' 32' 44' 8'I Ttt2.0% 2.OS I 2.09 2L I 2DR ,� s PROPOSED 6" CURE" CURB. & GUTTER CURB L RETAINING WALL 6" CURB &GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER L i 6" CURB' & GUTTER B" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK — EXISTING 8' SIDEWALK 6" CURB & GUTTER 9' SIDEWALK 8' SIDEWALK PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK SECTION N—N SECTION N—N SECTION 0-0 SECTION 0-0 EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. EXISTING BREA CANYON ROAD PROPOSED BREA CANYON ROAD (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) TOTAL AREA OF GRADING =18.62 AC AREA OF CUT = 5739 AREA OF FULL = 4271 EDWARD A. MANDICH 7.2213 FIRE AND PLANNING LP DATE REVISION BY > 0O P !OPOSED Pad=7 6.0' -' rn PRIC POSED A" ST. Lot 29 & 30ms �OI --\a vmt - EXIS ING GRADE Lot 39 - - ISTING 'P ----------- ------- -_- S. DIAMOND BAR -'- OPOSE Pa =727"5 BLVD. j PacII25' Pa =7220' "B"ST. pi Lot PROP SED R AINING WALL ��\-p OPOSE RETAIN NG W PR L POSED GRADE m 840 < / o / ^ --"""' 3 / Poli \\ ,139.5 \ \\ Nva MP -40 MEDIA FILTER THEY SHALL BE EITHER QUITCLAIMED, ABANDONED OR RELOCATED TO THE 1 n \\ vc\ p \ \ % SATISFACTION OF ALL INTERESTED PARTIES. DRAINAGE AND PUBLIC UTILITY EX SIGNAGE TO BE - /x'!= - 'd �.� \ \ �y r rm\ TO BE RELOCATED /p , _y 305 73 0 \�\ \u\\\ �� TREATMENT BMP EASEMENTS NECESSARY TO SERVE THIS PROJECT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE Boo 71RAL7 J'k I0t'JY� \ _ ^^ y -� - sl t m\ I CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AND WITH THE UTILITY PURVEYORS. EXISTING STORM DRAIN ` j \ o r --& Id PtiS -� p \N\\ ps1}99 i \S NATURAL AREA TO - (� EASEMENTS WILL BE ABANDONED DURING THE FINAL MAP PROCEDURES. BE PRESERVED PROPOSED SIGNAL / " /.91111 A 'o\ psl 1 �i o� �� o -_ / / I )�I S. MULTI FAMILY BUILDING TO MEET NFPA 13 STANDARDS. •' \ y }0� \ `nom �i I CONNECT TO EXISTING ••VA/ o \ _ zB0 \ t0" ACP WATER � v � _ I EX/ST/NG EASEMENTS 9. ESTIMATED EARTHWORK QUANTITIES: 415,500 LYS. CUT, 415,500 LYS. FILL. ps136 12 5 � 1 N 3,¢ pR 1NUFY 10. SEWER SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION \ M U R O2 EASEMENT 70 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES DISTRICT. 6 \5 p 871g. _ REC FEBRUARY 8, 1954 /N BOOK 43774, PAGE 241, UR 720 � - \ ' W - s \ r?2 " �f / / \ � , P' R` � � d� M � ;95 I \\ WPtV 11. PER LA COUNTY FIRM PANEL 1880 OF 2350. / 30' LANDS PES a 5Ir pslil5 -I 2 \ 1199 �fi>,r''j/ 2' pol \ m \o p5E ZER O3 EASEMENT TO GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, A CORPORATION ,9- \V ps13g5 \ -- '� FOR POLE LINES REC APRIL 28, 1954 /N BOOK 44446, PAGE 33 0R 12. PRIVATE WATER QUALITY BMP'S TO BE MAINTAINED BY H.O.A. / \2 a \ CV 6Bo � ,0•V1 � � C G � `vl I sltg9 2. "�. p a � app \\\\ \\... O6 EASEMENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR STORM GRAIN PURPOSES AS SHOWN ON TRACT No. 27577 REC IN 13. LOTS 62 & 63 ARE TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR &MAINTAINED 4 16 .0. " \ P s1'L1S9 // sl BY THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 A80 520 560 600 640 680 720 760 800 840 880 920 / - t 6 :�, \ \ p / E P \ \ \ BK 702, PGS. 22 70 25 INCLUSIVE OF MAPS RECORDS LOS ANGELES COUNTY. /To SIGNAGE TO BE 5 \ i t l TO BE RELOCATED �-I- � � % � 0 ®e S _� \ \ 0 6 MSE I \qea i \� �-1�' _ - - O EASEMENT 70 THE PUBLIC FOR WATER PIPELINES REC. AUGUST 31, 7960 AS INSL No. 3278, IN BK; 14. ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG DIAMOND BAR BLVD,. BREA CANYON RD AND -1 RIGHT-OF-WAY TO / o 0 0 _ o \� ^� ps11%' ps1 \ \ Ps -- _L _ _ _ _ PASADO DR. TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. / / I TR ICT 1117 _15DT.�l o'•� BE DEDICATED TO THE -F - � R°' " �'Psj1 \\\\ PsJA s1�5 \ \\ NO PAGE 305, OR. SURVEYORS N07E.' EASEMENT FOLLOWS THE CENTERLINE OF DIAMOND BAR BTW, / I CITY OF DIAMOND BAR a 2d \ 5c 1� l 6 0 - p l NO W/DTH IS GIVEN IN THE DOCUMENT 15. ALL TRASH 15 INDIVIDUAL PICK UP BY WASTE MANAGEMENT. TRASH PICK UP FOR i / $ / g -'� �5 �'a I sT6'\� g�+ .5 \ \ \ \ I, 17 EASEMENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR STREET PURPOSES AS SHOWN ON TRACT No. 25989 REC. IN BK 714, LOTS 2 THROUGH 5 NEEDS TO BE LOCATED ON "B'• STREET. TRASH PICK UP FOR EX.- 12' ACP WATER " 1`' -• P o, Q.' 10 \ s ?,i756.5 s13 \ ) 405 1 ro 1� gRUw P LOT 1 WILL BE ALONG THE LOOP ALLEY. m. ,p eb \ J 4a� . j ( P 2 • 01 p PGS 5 70 7 OF MAPS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY / /TO�BE RELOCATED _ EASEMENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR STORM DRAINS AND SANITARY SEWER AS SHOWN ON TRACT NO. 27577 16, LOTS 1-5 TO BE MAPPED FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES. r PROPOSED MEDIA m. / 'CUi Iyy. '� \ �.. ,-1gp \. o \� \ ps136 P' s \\\\ 111 .. \ \ BETPRESER ED URAL AREA TO EX POWER POLE/ oVfl / ps113 g -, P \ \ 2' ps1115 \ �, 7 ? WqD\ \ . ^ \\- V I I I REC IN BK 702, PGS 22 TO 25 INCLUSIVE OF MAPS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY. STORM DRAIN SYSTEM TO BE PRIVATE. 70 BE RELOCA� �'- -5 g0 n 141 V A Ps _V - ® EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN COUNT/ES GAS COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA FOR GAS PIPE LINES, LIGHT, POWER 6" 7.6" PROPOSED SIGNAL - a$ 1 ' ' Psl S / 186 V A A g0 _ ---- 18. EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED PER TREE SURVEY. C.F. PER PIAN 6" 12" 12" MODIFICATION CL - ,� FII( .1 - s1 \ 5 V l // A - PURPOSES REC FEBRUARY 17, 1964 REC AS INSL 3774, OR. W DIAMOND BAR BLVD 10" __ _ PROPOSED ft/Wi ,N --- � � � VA X1,3 � p A o � I p AVo A p�l� 1 & BREA CANYON RD. F o_- p 18 \ _ _ - �g 0 vv CUi a c ,2 AG V V v 5 x116 v i 61 V EASEMENT TO THE DIAMOND BAR WATER COMPANY FOR WATER PIPES REC AUGUST 31, 9960 REG. IN BK. 1-1/2 i,:, t PROPOSED EWA K i '' '� �' p i1 9` 185 V A 72 P I 3• A '� �' 168.5 s" V 0-962, PAGE 305, OR. AND REC. DATE: AUGUST 10, 1964 AS INST. No. 3417, OR R_ 1/2" R=3' .,,�; � � _ _ $ $ $ .. ` �� / i 0 AAVA 0� � ,1133 _ o !v Psl AV A � � 0 P ? SURVEYOR'S NOTE, EASEMENT FOLLOWS THECENTERLINE OF DIAMOND BAR BLVD., NO WIDTH IS GIVEN .. 12„W� 3 5 ti -_ _ EX R/W '- .. T ,1A�'. P hd� yF V . V A Ps 180 Ol 6 Pi188. 33 oa A IN THE DOCUMENT UTILITY 2 o c. s. TY AGENCIES .. � R=1/z• e :".,<;. FL R=1/2” - _ _ o _ -- 2,• -Ex cuee.�� �... ,..:':.: •t4 �111�1 2' vv ,� HIv ° v 5 v v v t.Z _ A W� TRASH: (SINGLE FAMILY HOMES) e v vv 1,1 1,8. vvl- - 8l? v ' • ' •->• _ EX. POKER POI - _ o� _ -- �- "r"' p s. 5 ` O 1 4' w Pz 9 \ aM . ' 6- . = 6a Pi1 NATURAL AREA 6 EASEMENT TO THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FOR SANITARY SEWER PURPOSES REC. NOVEMBER 11, 1971 WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WASTE MANAGEMENT INC. ' -• - - -.; ..: : ° iO BE RELOCATED 12 W-� tz W p_ _-- N _. /' v v , ? vy P ,s' �5! ov v��` 5 p=119 a- 35 6� U, ; BE PRESERVED 'i AS INST 3366, O.R. 271 S. BREA CANYON ROAD 13940 E. LIVE OAK AVE. A\ \ 1 q \ RE ps1 sp I V g' Y 1• l0 i '' - WALNUT, CA 91789 BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 •- . .:.:;:- .'.: / X23 - _- _ ___ j r ps. " 12 � ��-psl8 • - •- .. . - � � e- psl � � s8° S � 9 - V p �, � � / � 7 EASEMENT TO THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FOR STORM DRAIN, INGRESS AND EGRESS REC. DATE (909) 595-7554 (800) 266-7551 o \ ,9 .. , 36 MAY 982 AS INST. 82-508759, O.R. 5 _2 v v sL poP ' ,. v . v v �- p L, 2d' ,•• Z slp6' v v 11 32 " A A 6 TELEPHONE SERVICE: TRASH: FOR MULTI -FAMILY O RIGHT-OF-WAY TO ti 1 680 MP -40 �' TDRM IN P V 4'se \ l 1 4' R 9a i' 60 t,,p1 R3T H 18 1 BE DEDICATED TO THE EDTA FILTER 8 LOW FLOW X p� 6 6 s1 31 's V 1,51 , 1 A M V , v - 6 3 6 'o' �/ VERIZON VALLEY VISTA INC. ^ O Dll/ERSION 'o sl 1 - ,....r 6 b8 1a% •N 1 1 s" 1 5 8 P, 8 0 \ ` / / ✓{` 3' BROW�� /q G mrD 6, ry RB & GUM �ITY OF DI MOND BAR `a - EATMENT P To P p8 P - vv w P` 6 -1 �FII( CUi / UITCH, irP 1400 PHILLIPS RANCH RD. BALDW E. LIVE OAK AVE. 4 ROLLED CURB k GUTTER {.VI4U W� 4LI� d / - / � _ � -T G7uRE -' � � � <^ _ r \ � �q � � � 9 bd r i i � I �` POMONA, CA 91766 BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 7 / v -- _ a A p0.2 25 S ps1116 ��, vv ps1151 7 5 as4-y&r �� 1 : o �s� /c v sj855 �- 3 0 s /� / & _ ) ( (800) 483-5000 (800) 266-7551 NIS NTS `Fill / //' v v ° � P � /� z • _ >� 1 � " I (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) / '/ /Psl I/�s 1 �2 \ s1%61 3 r'/ r'3�., 0 o.uMp y \ \���� ps1134 v p j 60 r �5 r '`\ '( ELECTRIC SERVICE: CABLE N � T.1 I � ; I I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. TIME WARNER 013 51 �;,/ / P� ,1615 �.II _ 59 S�N DIMASG CA V91773 GLENDORA,OCAE96740 Ps114 \ s1 I e 1 N 1..i, NATURAL AREA To -.- �I (800) 655-4555 3' EX- US 9 e° / /// / \\ `'% o� �' 6�\ po71 69a i \ po1�'S i a s-�/ e2 P'1610 P'O I_ i o-7 BE PRESERVED l �I jT �1-+- �I POSTAL SERVICE: _ s, o \ r DI7C�E7YP - - _. 4 " „ \, 1'J �€ , .. ,r ! O GAS SERVICE: USPS GARAGE / /EX k/w 7i ��02/ / / A' o s" p ` 7 s1 ,' ps11 1 _ - 1 ,r / '> N1 0 A,5 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. DIAMOND SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BLVD. / 0 � o: DOOR EX POWER POLE r CU ym�•� 0`u s- / / a r. p ) o/ 5 t -'� ` �1 1919 S, STATE COLLEGE BLVD. DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 T AND U 6•• ANAHEIM, CA 92806 (800) 27 TILITIES PR POSED RB RF ^� / 4 a - l l ^/ �� �. m r 3 5-8777 CUN /W ^o �_ /� 2i 2� %MM 70 BE RELOCATED PROPOSED R ps1111 q 3 PEDESTRIAN / p 'r9� �i� ps185•rJ Bo �I \v �Dl'r > �, w- 1,2A 27-2200 SEWER SERVICE: (TR UNK LINES( (800) 4 ,i,• / T� / Opp // / 0f A / o 'z '•'. ps > /8 b�� / �' / o �s `< v s� ss: G `L^ .r -- SCHOOL DISTRICT: LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT WALNUT VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT 1955 WORKMAN MILL ROAD W4i a § / / / ! /•�o^ ,'17 880 SOUTH LEMON AVE. WHITTI(562)E6 CA 90607 06 SR\� P 1 i/ > / `. ,l 90 / �. 61 A \: �.. pot CI r i> _ \/ WALNUT. CA 91789 (562) 699-7411 / /o / h //��° 6/ / I // / /y. l / `> - 0 m. 16 / / Ams // > P, h3 ^ 6 a la polo- , \� 16o HE 93 _ /' SEWER SERVICE. (MAIN LINES) 0 3 I lob U CURB DETAIL / " / �`O�� h / // - 'r / / / 1` r ,153 , , r >. / a^ A'C r I LOS ANGELES COUNTY OF PUBLIC WORKS e / m. p' 2 �4 0 v r ri ) SEWER MAINTENANCE DISTRICT r Y r r 9� . s GUi NTS � < / / h O / � / Ic Zt / / / 'L 6 . \ � , r I (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) / / p 675 / O / / - "a / / >O LOT a' � `' \ O ^ - tS `P ' ° sz & 181 5 r r / 900 LHAM BR , NTCA g L0V 6.3 / 0 00 / / ��A. , r a �..., > P> \o r >' r .Q o , / -<<°. r .y _.. p r , ALHAMBRA. CA a �9 IPA / `O� o / 1 v r� / /y. $ r' ��C �/5� 6t �'Py' r 4. r / s>, q �� r L Jr'i sT 3' BROW / / J \ 4, / h / / 90i' 3K'- r r r s1� 2 I, r .\o Q J• y r er DITCH, TYP C / cslrII�.P�� a s> RTft ,o A o BENCH MARK s rlc� r 76 ' tia / q0 s 4 . FI 1 /._ // _ \ / / / �" '\� >> , r , Q NATURAL AREA TOi p XISTING / e� / e s> r 0- - 40 ('` - S h\ v , BE PRESERVED' LOS ANGELES COUNTY BENCHMARK NO. G 5073 ELEVATION: 726.809 DATUM: NAVD 88, B / U ERGROUNO / °' / / /'by ^° h 3 1• r/ Po 5 r 111.5 / ,ri 0� \ I \ 2005 ADJUSTMENT ti Fill @ e, b 26' r' / 0 / Pr. / R CE FLOWS �ry� 7a / ooP 61 I I/ M• / / / �0 r /b . BUY ^3P o _ mom, / "` RS f '\° i x18,.5 - -1 9 / i/ /_ 7 R r> Q o°j h n ,� h o / / �ti a>, r< P/ y DESCRIPTION: LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TAG IN EAST CURB OF DIAMOND BAR BLVD. 42.7 .FEET EAST OF CENTERLINE AND 95 FEET NORTH OF CENTERLINE OF �p�k4� /�' / �Q�OPGT CROOKED CREEK DRIVE. " �Q• I �- -- / / l>o C 1 r.. r 6 moo\ pot sP �b / /Y \� mss• - \ 11,2 'r PSI _ LEGAL DESCRIPTION I F / ^e As'x> 0�5 .a� 9j/g \✓ s>'r7 �, / po11 L \ �P c /� FlRE TRUCK ��� \ 6 — 5.oR = 1 :: N a 61 �.a 11 P/1 15 s e5 o106.Oss" J, s , s \ �. ' S� 0/ / e/ � BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 9 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO TURNING RADIUS DETAIL �� ^ — i a ' �5 s P A� 0 6 • ti / MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, GOUTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. J. 9, m �O � / ° EC /, c rr h .\9 ij 3' TOE .._ v - �✓�� � a1 � / �. V 690 7! OS ' � r' � '��+ '.a 0 60 0. 69 b.. � IB' r y0• �rii DITCFY TYP / 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK (/ 1 / / ,/ ry9 v 6, ?,1-- 16 v "rz^y - 9 r' / _ _ u 5o r STA TEMENT OF OWNERSHIP Tr�rIC7_ l�)Cl _,271v-77� o/ i ?7s s _I - 905 P'�O90 7 po1565 y N 5� w 9Y A - i �r / Ty rC I T IIID. <?11-19r) 1 HEREBY STATE THAT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED UNDER MY EpSNC .0 \/ SUPERVISION AND THAT THE OWNER OF RECORD HAS KNOWLEDGE h 68. /LP / �0 4 X160' Pot j NATURAL AREA TO OF AND CONSENTS TO THE FILING OF THIS MAP. 44 , 55 ESMT � RZ i BE PRESERVED 1l} 1 l r r \ p T��r , r I � P 0� 1 \ v mi.\ > � TYP/CAL STREET SECT/ONS / I NATURAL AREA TO \\ \ \^ \ oY \\\c \ ss' pol�so TeE FA IF 11 BE PRESERVED \ mop ` 25• 1S r`,�„ DITCH, TYP - 1 �� � � SERVICE ROAD ANo MO p,1 C _.. r / - / TRAC-r J` D, �JeJBr� PEDEsrRIAN AccrsS ONLY -_� ^ -&o 2.; . po1560 .s 'y0 / ' EMERGENCY -�j� /, s, 16 rn d ,0 3'B , i '`V• INGRLSS EGRESS > _ IT gg / _ � �r ITCH, TIC ^ b � 6//' �/ { ` _ 3' TOE DITCH, TYP _ 1 - 6 a NATUIRAL AREA TO BE PRESERVED 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK f � EMERGENCY 'INGREss/EGRESS 7•p �SSEC7T�ION A—A •%p NORTHERLY CL SOUTHERLY ENTRY ' PORTION OF "As STREET R/W R/W R/W R/W R/N' 46' R R/W \. RIGHT-OF-WAY TO 54' R/W 54' R/W 1W BE DEDICATED TO THE (PRIVATE)aTY� 61AMOND BAR 27.0' 27.0' 27.0' 27.0• 23.0' 23.0' r 1 9.0' 36' 9.0'1 I 14.0' 26' 14.0' I 36 5' 78' 18' S' 1V� 14' S' 18' 78' 5' 4'1 14, 10' 13' 13' f0' 411 p• g• g• p• 2' 2�R WY PKW 2WYI� ,,��PKW 2 2' PKWY PKWY 2, 0,�RKING P/IRKING / 81 RKIJc� RKInc�2^ V' 2v W 2� OOH• 2 D, 11 L �P SIDEWALK SIDEWALK SIDEWALK SIDEWALK SIDEWALK SIDEWALK Q rvmo i ruoo x SECTION B—B ENTRY • PORTION OF "A" STREET (PRIVATE) 1 50 50 I 8' 42' 4 35' 8' MDI N 3• I 2.0% - 2.09 Tim T IUr J9"� URB 6" CURB &GUTTER 6" CURB &GUTTER ' SIDEWALK SECTION L—L EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) WALL CURB & CURB & GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER SECTION E—E SECTION C—C SECTION D—D 'B' STREET - LOCAL STREET 'A' STREET - LOCAL STREET 'A' STREET IF LOCAL STREET (TAPER) PARKING BOTH SIDES PARKING BOTH SIDES NO PARKING (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) r PROPOSED NIEROWNENTS R/W 112' 1 50' I 54' I� 42' 8' 4' 42' 8'1 M DIiN I I I 1 _ I 2.0% ® CURR 6" CURB & GUTTER 8' SIL \-6" CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK -8' SIDEWALK SECTION L—L PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) 50' 50' 35' 4' 45' -6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER - SECTION M—M EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) r PROPOSED W R/W i NTPROVQIIN/S R/W 718' I 50' 60' I 8' 8' 35' 4' 63' I I 3• I M DIAN I -� 3' 207 I SOX s CURB L PROPOSED 8" CURB & GUTTERfi" CURB &GURETAINING WALL TTER 8' SIDEWALK PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK SECTION M—M PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) ' ?IF- `_ F. (-7-/ // i rL �• \\ a' ^O� 9-j515 N Ol' ti / - 8' EASEMENT 12' EASEM NT 2' 15.0' 2' \ \ i ' 2' 0.5• EASEMENT 0.5• ' 12.0' 2' 1$%'NATURAL A A `\05' 05' j62 0.5' BE- ESE ED0-tow \ \ \ 1:1 2''4 �2q1 11 ,T.,1 414-0 SWALE SWALE1 '✓"Y T, 8 / / / �\ AC BERM J AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM NATURAL AREA \ SECTION 1-1 SECTION J—J SECTION K—K / BEPRESERVED EMERGENCY ACCESS ROAD SERVICE ACCESS ROAD PEDESTRIAWSERVICE ACCESS ROAD 7 /v \ I (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) n / \ \)NATURAL AREA �/ ���55 0 0 o g E PRESERVED f0 ❑ 0 0 J 35' 32' 326' m 4• � FL Y8• y• 3• v FL pg• FL 19• 2.875' v FL 26' 2.875' MIN. TRAVEL MIN. MIN. TRAVEL PARKING MIN. TRAVEL MIN. 1 .ZQx Asx _.oz 4" ROLLED O" CURB d" ROLLED 6°CURB 4" ROLLED 0' CURB \\ GDR CURB DR SECTION F—F SECTION G—G SECTION H—H PRIVATE STREET PRIVATE STREET TYPICAL PRIVATE DRIVE (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) AND FlRE LANE (PRIVATE) PROPOSm IMPROVOORS DE rF►1 r PROPOSED r PROPOSED I I NMRO"ODS CE I NIPROWEMENTS 100' R/W RAV I 1 6' I R/IY R/W 80 REW R/W 92' I R/W 50' 50' 50' I 1 56' 1 40' 40' 40, 52' 35' 14' 35' 8' 8' 42' I 4' I 4/' 1 8' 3- 8' 32' 32' 8' II MEQ IAN I I M DI N I 8' 32' 44' 8'I Ttt2.0% 2.OS I 2.09 2L I 2DR ,� s PROPOSED 6" CURE" CURB. & GUTTER CURB L RETAINING WALL 6" CURB &GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER L i 6" CURB' & GUTTER B" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK — EXISTING 8' SIDEWALK 6" CURB & GUTTER 9' SIDEWALK 8' SIDEWALK PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK SECTION N—N SECTION N—N SECTION 0-0 SECTION 0-0 EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. EXISTING BREA CANYON ROAD PROPOSED BREA CANYON ROAD (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) TOTAL AREA OF GRADING =18.62 AC AREA OF CUT = 5739 AREA OF FULL = 4271 EDWARD A. MANDICH DATE W.O. FEET 50 120 GROSS AREA 0 30 D h CONTOUR INTERVAL INCHES TOTAL LOTS MAP DATE IDENTIFIER WE Of IAIECT CHANGE TO THIS MFH 7/30/13 BY: LP WTE OF TPIS PLOT 09/19 13 ly 30, 2013 1855-162AX 29.7 AC.± 5' PREPARED FOR. PREPARED BY.• OWNER.• t t LENNAR® Z ai 25 ENTERPRISE ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656 (949) 349-8100 HUNSAKER 6c ASSOCIATES Z I R V I N E I N C %ANNING ENLINEEBINC 9l1RVEYINL Three Hughes lrol , CA WI Hf: (949) 5830]59 PIk (949) Sg3t01g � GRAD/NG PLAN I VEST/NG TENTATIVE TRACT 72295 F:\0718\Planning\OA_Project\GRADING PLAN\0718P_GRADING PLAN. dwg 7.2213 FIRE AND PLANNING LP DATE REVISION BY DATE W.O. FEET 50 120 GROSS AREA 0 30 D h CONTOUR INTERVAL INCHES TOTAL LOTS MAP DATE IDENTIFIER WE Of IAIECT CHANGE TO THIS MFH 7/30/13 BY: LP WTE OF TPIS PLOT 09/19 13 ly 30, 2013 1855-162AX 29.7 AC.± 5' PREPARED FOR. PREPARED BY.• OWNER.• t t LENNAR® Z ai 25 ENTERPRISE ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656 (949) 349-8100 HUNSAKER 6c ASSOCIATES Z I R V I N E I N C %ANNING ENLINEEBINC 9l1RVEYINL Three Hughes lrol , CA WI Hf: (949) 5830]59 PIk (949) Sg3t01g � GRAD/NG PLAN I VEST/NG TENTATIVE TRACT 72295 F:\0718\Planning\OA_Project\GRADING PLAN\0718P_GRADING PLAN. dwg 60 SCALE DESIGN SITE D 7�� 1p�� 13 F7.A C CG.4 i' .� .2 F 1 C5,7 C6.7 C5,2 C2. C9.(i C CA.7 CE l,2 L:! 'f U.7 C't4.f C 7 Cl 4 C2.B A.4 07,8 1,..5 C10.1 G13_ :15.2 0..f . C14.'L Cil.7C-.3 CUTFILL F d.4 1`0.7 3 CL1 7 CB.9 CID cl3.5 177 1 017.7 c16 9 015.0 CIS A C[ 6 440 C::, f," 3 ,3 C C3.0 C'i.0 Ct-- LJ. `u [I 5,n l;1/.11 019 C:19�9 C... 7 011 C� F)qAW VOLUME 4 159 f ■ 4099 570 CYS 870 0.4. 01,'/ Cd .9 C7.D S 04,5 05.9 .9 f. 117 ,U 073.0 015.7 CF C20.f 022.2 24 024.3 022,3 G18, C]].Fl0.1 L 1G 5 CYS 2 CI C4.7 06.4 '.,6 011.7 C13. CB 3 (12.' 016.1 B C2P 6 1,'23.2 G27.0 026.9 026.7 C24.A C2 t. 9 Cd.0 9 0 CEDL C13.2 7. 013.7 050.4 C'..0 C11_l .4.5 Cfe,d 56 015.3 017.8.0 L"7_.1 +"_.! C2tE_7 029.2 029.6 C30.0 029,3 C27.5 024.9 J6 C9_:; U; 0.9. C14.2 4.1 014,8 CI0,2 C 5 010,2 C CI C2U.s' :21.5 023,0 0.2 C20`c 114.2 G3F1.7 091.7 032 30,0 029. .P. 02:1 074-4 f..4.7 0 1:14.7 016. Ci6.7 C 6 019.1 A CA .C: CIO.1 020.8 .24.1 C i 0.2 C' ,. C32.0 C33.9 ['33.4 1:33.A .I'S '30,4 030.5 C31 8 C:3 .. C32.9 130.0 C2.0,U C27 :19,1 CO -7 CO. ash r .9 013 1 1:12.0 C1G.5 019 049.6 075.6 2' .5 CP2.1 023.0 024, 0.i C"1`0 0 C21.5 1,`24,::1 ? .[ .. .i.7 035.6 GAG. 8 C36,1 035 3 .4 031,6 032.1 l: 9.13 029,8 C71.Ci C::3a.0 f. .7 C"53.3 031.3 0.2. NOTE: i • BASED O THE J 20 12 AERIAL C^ Cie 7 CL9 5 G15 7 4 C22 5 F,?. 9 C2 3.8 0:3.7 C24 C25 2 027.5 CS 3 0.1 033.7 035.7 C96.I C37 7 32.4 07.3 C I.4 C, i C31.4 032 2 32 C3Q 7 C30.7 7 033.5 --34.7 C-34.9 C 2 ti C 7. C Cl C96.D 0;2].5 G25.d "29 1 C3Q,4 I; IS. 024 3 -,.4 1,'16.5 027 _ C26.5 077,0 0.6 029. f.' -_, C33.5 034.7 037.1 ['3fl.2 36 .7 "3!5.1 029.9 1:30.2 0.:1 B 5;31.2 C (1.9 C3].d '3U.P 031.,' G32.5 3.1 C34.B 1:35.6 C 0.4 0.1:.7 C: ..►RA OF GRADING- 28.62ACRES 0 9 {; 1'SA 2 I'4°i f C3F, 6 E3' 9 038.8 .35.9 035.4 036- 0.2 F 029.5 029,9 30,4 0.3 030,0 031,7 0.3 .4 030-7 031.5 ,32.9 0.3-1 077.11 35 H.6 CB 8 Cl. is SCALE.' 1 " = 60 ' C419EM1 07130113 03: 00 P. M. C 1,15 7 1,'1 7 023.2 629.8 039.1 0.3. 1 C3i ? 0..'9 _ L�,i. t1 1,26 5 l,c G�0.9 .29- - sj 0.2' G C, 4 C32.D 0;14.3 C3A 1 7i L 72 026.6 027,0 2 :iR,2 1,'36.1 1:3F.H 1:37.9 i.5 ,35.7 3.7 034,4 C 5.9 1`,3'.. 035.6 L'315.f 032.9 Ca 0:29.1 CLI.' 030.1 30.3 G:S1.A C' q [29.7 O'31:lL 1:3A.O '36 o 1:31,1 3 040 • 15. CS<7 04.`3 ..I CA. 1 010 A LL"1B.0 .0 3.2 0.5 C29� .33 5 G33.fi 033.3 032,9 .-3. 029 5 F 9. 030.5 C3i.i 034 7 C97.F.V ,37 2 C3B.9 37.5 033,5 034,0 [': .1 CY, 3 036.9 Cita 2 C•. V,1 C2B.5 029 3 030.0 G' I.- 030,8 (1:11.5 C 9.0 130.3 031.7 1,33.7 CG 7 G3B, ti C C. ..,1 C70.f f.:8.n 0.1 1,3 C5.5 1,'.5 CiP,B 020.2 1,.. 7. G3 5 032 8 032.4 C31.0 C31 0 C3QP C29 8 CAD,2 1,31. '"a.1` 094.6 C.' S 037.0 035,5 035.1. C". 3.0 C -...i 3J.6 034.1 C 7 C35.2 C35 7 C31 C2t1 •:8.7 G '.G C9U.3 I,,30.4 0'31.3 0. 1- 029.0 E31-3 033. C. 021 F ,21.2 C 0.1, 0 r I. .9 0'2.5 F3,A�70 1`5. F4.IS F2,5 C f:6,Q 1 1 G17.6 C25.B C25 '' 34 .`.i 031.4 030.7 029.9 026 8 L•2B.6 L"2'.8 f. ,4 C29.9 C 9 C35.A 035.4 C37 C37,B L34.! C32.5 032,8 C'-.2 C33. 1;3A. t 0.3 .D 27.8 ClB.S 1:2]. 0.2. 9 ti:3u,2 Cdi.0 [l.0 t' .d ,19.3 1,4 t ... 7 010.9 C15.7 1.7 C25 8 C26.3 C2i :3 .7 034.2 C29 7 C29.1 C28 .3 027 ,29.3 C25.3 C26 f 031.5 C34.0 C 3 C36,1 C37,O 0.3 .7 1:32.7 032,5 0.32 9 033.0 ''3 .P 033,7 034.:9 029 P 028,1 1`1 7 L'2.A 05.6 04.7 .. ., •, C .0 020.3 C?: C.r^ .. ;2 029-7 029-5 029 4 C26 0 020.0 C27.0 C29 7 '?� 0 L25i.0 C27 Y, 30.9 C 6 {:,-1.1.3 1,'35.1 036.1 'J C3� 031.6 C32.0 ry C 1`1 06.3 L .9 C4,7 C. - 0.1 .0 1,],n M. ,9.f I i _� [32,u C.. -i3..1 1,'3-. 1,'28. E23.7 4.}-.0 03,4 .3 .5 9 Ft6,7-.7 1`13.4 FIQ..1 FG.5 1`2.7 0.1 .,- • .5 C4... C4,7 CB,O 1 .A 019 i C' -7? C30 4 CY) 0 029.7 C29 C? '.;�.G 026 6 ,;:-.1 024.0 C23.2 22 .. 0'25.5 C29.5 Citi, '33.•1 C.d 4 1;34.6 035.6 C 5.5 C31 2 Cil1.`i C31.8 023.5 C 0.7.-0 E.],I'1 F]') 110. -2U 3 1`22 1`20 B 1`18,3 1`75 Q Fk3.5 1`10 5 1`6.14 '2 7 'S.B 1:7.3 1,11.'? 05.1 1,9,8 CSA, 073.6 013.0 0.7. 1,5.1 3. 7B0 -. " ... - ,.y" .- - 0. 3 '�6.F C2Fi e G20.b 027.0 0^2.,' G22.2 0.'2] 8 C 1`:',...0 026-7 7 1'7::: .!i t','J3..=. 1:3d.2 C15.F+. 3.7 '30.2 027- +., ..� 019.8 Si.S ., 7,d .4 .4 1`25,6 fi 0 1`24.4 F22.8 2}.,G 1`38.6 F-15.3 - 6 1`10.6 1`6 7 F. .3 1,'1 7 CY 5 Cf2 6 CP.4 1,'t-' Cill .3 f:'ES 07.5 .1 CE3. 019.0 C23.F C24.9 F; 2 6 C10.0 L .6.1` 0.6 Cb .2 GO.. '110,0 1,1,3,7 _ ,x.3.6 L2B,3 C30.A 030.7 28 02.1 ... C1f.6 0.1 CS6.3.3 C A. CIO 71` .q 4.9.' e 014.7 L'12.A C 7.1 Cif},4 f.l0,d C' .1 018,7 021.5 025.:3 024,0 e2 026.6 C._",7 027 G2G.1 14. 027.3 L' a -A �1. 9 020.1 [17 021.3 C27,4 0311,0 C32.0 0;33 0.3=4.3 C 2 027,0 I" .4 017 - CA.: F F_ 1`19.4 F27.d F. F26.4 F27 B 7.4 F26 7 F23,5 1`'1 7 F19 9 F17.3 F'11.7 9.. 1`1 0.7 C1`l. I? Cto. 9 C4,8 05 6 .7 Ct1.5 C18.3 C1l_1 Q C2 .700 .- - ��. a - 0..'7 G CfA.O 010.1 021,(1 C2a .3.9 C25.�. _2A.5 025.9 0.2 .0 C27.iJ ::: 027.3 027.3 Cr- .2 Ct7 4 077,9 097.4 0'7.0 07.0 029-5 092.0 C.� [:29.9 ''. .A 0.]7, 0.3, A ,3 F 1`30. 0 1`29.2 1`28 1`26-7 F2A,3 1`22 .3 5 14.1 1`70.3 FS.B 1`1 03.6 Fq F .p ',9 6 0.1.0 06.2 16.4 C12, [:1 6 10.0 CL0.S1 090.6 616.7 022.9 020,5 C32.3 [31 _i 026,6 r. H 1,17.3 016,3 .1 C12.6 Cll 4 0..3. C 1 7� - C.' I' a i 023 7 74.4 0.2 - .26.'.i ''7.7 C=' 1,27.3 02[.9 G2t5. :15,3 CI!-', 3 C1Ci,0 1,'1 ! C74.B C. 17.9 099.5 1,'20, [:76. 0.2, 3.7 3.5 .1 agv.�D.9 F _ 1`33.4 1`3 F34,p 1`32.9 F32� 1`33,-0 1`33.4 1`32 1 2B 124 F F2].O FlB 7 1`15 4 177.3 16.1 FO CS.A 7 F2 04.0 C.fE 1,13.7 CS3.5 013.3 C15 • C:;I .'.11 17..1 Ct3,9 (37. 1 C21.9 C29.5 C2C.9 L" GfA.4 11".T 017. (:111,9 056.1 CY9.3 07.0 .•9 -�] .2�. - b� 8 C 7.0 1',17.1 019- 027,7 ,I C24.s (;24.0 C26.1 C�7 028.9 C2F - ':±5.9 C25.A C 3.1 '12,4 C12.'.i C11.'a f. C14,6' 3.7 .9 F6,0 r,,5 ...3 1.1` F r_ 1`34 1`34.5 F35,6 F36 0 F36.P F36.0 F33,5 X9.5 .9 1`27.6 F29.B 728 9 F23.5 F r GLE 0 019-2 023.- C22�5 024.3 C:I.E - 023 2 _; 7.!1 .15.3 Cl6.7 022- 9•l C97�4 097.0 016. CS€../; .9 3 L; 1'9.2 018.0 018.4 '.3 .l . f P'17 -EI 619.1 ._! 022 '022,2 023.3 C; 5 023 ] C- 28,5 C 4 C25,C C24.fi 0.1 110-2 011. CG. 0.2, 70 1`12.8 F25, 1`3:. 1`37 137.9 'F 36.5 1`36.4 " 7.6 1`37,9 1`37.51`22.9 F2.3,7 F'24 B F25,6 ..7 1`2 .9 F. ! .9 Fl., 2 CIO I} [, 53.7 C28,6 C:)1-4 0.: ).9 C�.'6.5 L2f (i 0.,3 3 :e ,3 CS'".G C15 G CIO -7 19.1 C1 B.5 Cf8.6 015.9 C15.9 010 -18-•1 0:1.9,4 C'19.7 C20.0 L2Q.2 .0 C1B.1 S.7 C1�.� 019.. _ I . a _ r C 7 Cts 9 1,`77.0 1 4 0.2;_ '3 G21 .2 027,3 '2A '2G .5 C24.6 024.2 CF 9 '7-3 i:7 7 CF F 14,8 F .3 1` 5.3 F '.0 38-7 F3 F39.B F39.8 F40-3 1`3 F3;},y .3 3 F26.f 1`22.1 F18,3 F17,9 FI' 1 4 1`22.0 1`24.9 h2•I 6 F. .2 F F'fB6 r1.6 C27 r .7 031 :16.6 012.6 G93.3 074.1 ..7 CS7,2 011.9 018.5 L.. ifi .0 018,1 C1B.9 020.5 Cii,7 [.]7.' Cf7,_ B. Lf 8.1 L1l.0 1.17-., [, 6 17. - � a .4,1`] [: .7 C�7 2 [;3d C38.1Y ,31,1.2 3� 0 �3 -6 A 1`0 r - f C18.A C C1B.3 C19,3 021,1 20.3 17.5 017,9 016 C19,d 17.6 Clfi 018.] 071).6 19,6 C:'. G20.0 020.0 8.3 C19.3 C28.3 C2 C2A-9 E IS 06.9 0'.5.0 Cb A3 1`U.? �W 18.5 1`26 1`35. F .5 1`41.5 Fd1.5 F 1`i FAf .9 1`41.7 .` ,5 F34 .6 1`30.1 F24.Q FIS -2 1 F Ff4.D VIA F15,1 1`17.0 F1B.7 F 9 A 12 1 f `7.11. 2. [;10.7 -21.` (:: 1-1 037.•1 0:70. L3B. � ,37.p t3� fl 1,11 3 L1(V.9 [,11,3 012, ' Ctd,S .I.7 3.8 _ J CIA.1 0..1 GE9.5 '18-5 C19 Q 0.1 cit., E- 011.3 ,6.6 G2,' L;1.1 C3. r, = i F17.2 F25.2 F33.4 '40 , 1`4 F43,2 F'42.6 F42.5 3.5 1 F39.A F35,6 F31.1 1`2 5.d F12 4 F9.7 F9.0 F9.0 F'-9.5 F9.9 F12,0 F 2.6 FS 7 FO .13 :� 5 C.33.0 0.3 4 C 0,9 0.4 .5 0..4 FI [:301.3 -13.9 09.2 (:9 6 011.0 3.4 [;13_ 012.3 Ci3.2 013.5 :' 3.`} 037.3 +� -.., 1 .3. C'U_D 0.2 G76.3 '19,4 CiG r 010.3 CiA,6 -' `' 7d0 -I 7 C20.: '7.5 01'7,8 1,'9 018.6 CIA 0..1,6 029,5 1.1:1,8 _1 C]C3.3 03,4 1`3. 0,9 F C0.5 00.8 .5 F .3 F3f..8 F-18 „ 42,5 F42, 3.7 F43.5 f 4 .3 F39,A 1`3613 F'3 7 1`22.0 FI 1`90.5 h'B. F5 �a 1`4.0 F4.0 3 F5.1 F5.9 5.7 F.4 GO 017 8 03.0 032.7 038.7 V. Il C'�:I [.1.0 1,.3.1 + C.i.7 i;r. 07.7 08.5 0.`1.-. 012.11 0.7 012.1 093,2 C'i3.9 014.7 015.3 011.1 01`.1.'3 '.18.b 1.'11., 1 1 rz. b❑ - 015.0 Cl [:1f1.9 C'19.0 0.'2 0 019,6 C2C.0 C 9,/ 017.0 1'17.7 Cie. C 9 c;,1.0 C22.1 021.7 020.' C CA F1.5.5 18.3 F 1`17.7 F13 1 F5.9 .6 F2.0 1`1, F7 A F26.!,� 1`35.8 f-4 .6 F49.9 F44.0 F44. -45, 4 .3 1`40.4 F36,8 F' .2 1`27.4 1`22.3 F16.5 Fit ,2 79.9 FD. _ F0,2 FD.fi ' ..1 C d.6 I' 7.'3 C .1 .7 : 3. i'.:] .19.7 C- i A .29.5 1`.6 1 0.5 3 CG.3 .13.8 0.9. C 03.3 070.6 012.2 013.5 2 - / ❑ (f / C: .1 C f Fi_3 "73.9 C3D.G 455. 037.4 33. C. 0 08.8 G€i G .7 0.5. C7.I .O 06,4 C9. 9 031.5 013.0 G14.5 117.tS Cf .6 C .0 021.1 1:20,0 I'r1 .5 C2.1.t7 i.A 016.9 C B.G 021.] 024.8 ] I:Ei. 1`22 F 1`21.5 F2P .2 1`73.9 1`19.3 Fit .7 1`7:1`42 7 .7 F46.0 P44.9' F43.4 F'. 1. F3B.8 F34.A 27 1`21.9 1`19.. F15,7 F10.0 F4.8 C3.E. L CS.0 1`;S .O C2.ti 1 ep C16.A 015,5 .0 021.0 C 2C21.4 021.5 1..0 C.16,5 C19,5 C20.1 C19 02,11 D F2U. 1`2. 1`25. F24.5 F24 5F24.5 F24.2 1`22. 16, '12.5. F10,5 FO .7 1`12. 32.. 1`41.3 FAA.2 1`43.2 FA2, F41.7 F'7. F32.7 1`27.6 F .6 1`19.2 1`75.1 Ff I.. 1`'1 3 F9-2 .8 F3-2 C3.0 C6. 6 CS.d; C(I,7 1A.7 G. C2B,6 33.3 1,'3 31` 2 c .f, 4.7 C2�1 04.6 Lv �.7 0.7.. 06.6 07.0 09.5 010.6 092,3 0.1 3 .- 0.1COCS 014,'7 0.17.6 L. J.9 C21,1 C20.9 C21.5 C20. 075.6 C17.4 F J F ' 15.9 1`'27.4 1`26-0 fLIVU 2 126.5 F25.8 1`25.0 1`2..4 F l,B F15.6 F13.f i ..6 29. F39,0 F 4,3 F41.9 F39,5 1`37.2 �.4.5 31.2 F29.1 1`,. 22.5 FIB,8 F15,5 FID -5 F 3 1`1.2 C2.3 G3.9 C5. ]' 1,'.5. 2.0 l 028.0 21] =1 (..! 6 (:�. f:1i, .1 l.0 9 LC -A 1 1,5.7 05.3 CO.G9C 09.9 C1D,6 .` _ 3.3 F .0 23.A 1`'2 ,9 1`30,3 -2 1`30.0 f29,A F28.D 26.4 P2$.5 1` 2 F .a 1`18.6 1`17 A, F F .A 10. Fbp,3 1`42. 1`42.7 IFAO.2 F36 G I'3D.G 1`27.7 1`24, F 1`18,1 1`13.7 1`9,1 F 1`[1, C :i -.7 05.4 P_ 09.0 04,3 016.. (;79 ,20 .7 Ci'. - C d.1`'+ C .6 CE+.7 '9.0 CA 03,2 C4,2 C7.2 09,5 Cl 4 1:12.8 10.0 2,4 ClC15.7 CSA. <:21�1 9.5 C19.5 C16.2 A.1 C2,3 C2:,6 L 05.7 06.9 t:11.f, Ci'. C71),2 011. C13.2 1:15.3 11.4 020.- is C17. 2 10,6 F30 F .0 F32,5 F32.5 F32.5 31.1 F29.5 F28.0 1`26 '..9 1`20.2 Fig 1`79.8 F 1`.I 10,5 F42.1 F41,6 1`41.7 F41.s 1`39.9 - F25,4 F21.2 F 9. 15.5 FS1: F6.7 r 1`0. C4,3 C7.5 -.5 ,.6 4.5 Cu 1,'92.3 015.' 1:15 _ 0.7.] 1. 1;15.8 96.0 I; 1r.4 F .5 FO'.6 1,'0.: 0.`.i 5 - �y9 s� b 1 " i:4. ;3.3 02.3 02,3 02.3 03,5 C 7 L']7.•I C9.1i 09,8 1:14.1 "11.4 012.2 [:1-.5. ' 1,'15.3 0.3. 1`'9, 1`12. F .7 : 4.1` 1`34.2 1`]1 i.7 1`33,5 F32.6 1`32. 1`'71. '.6.' 1`23.4 1`21.9 1`20,`3 1`19.0 F-" 25 F .3 1`42.4 1'42.E 1`47.4 1`39.6 1`3. .5 1`29,3 F;74.f 2 .1 1`18.6 1`14.0 A.A FA.B 62. 1, C1.S1 06.1 0.9.' 05.9 03.0 .4 013.0 C aU 0 [: 1E.;1 r.9. 12.7 Y- 1 .2 1`10.5 1`3 0 1`5, S 1.�� 1,10,3 0,12, .lA, CIA f 0:74.1 Ci. P5 6 59.7 Fit 9 F2 Me .2 ci 3 C1.3 01,13 C2,7 CA. i7 09.1 CJ ' ca.a C9,3 C9-7 1, .3 et$.1 L"12,2 1 F1D F14 2.2 35.0 F35.3 1`35-6 F35. F34.0 1`33. 1`20.3 1'26.1 F24.2 F22,7 1`21.' F F ,7 41 F40.5 FAC 2 O. 1`42.1 FA 1,5 F 9 1`35,5 1`34.0 F 4. 21,1 F17.7 1`12.6 1`7.5 '1.3 C3.2 L'7.A CB.6 02.6 '1"i C 4 i .1 012 l 3 5 53.9 1`2.5 1`10.6 1`7.9 :1`d 1`0. C0.7 01.5 C3 4 C4.3 7 Cti. `, C7.5 08.2 C8 3 C6.6 CG.O .050.2 F _6 F 34.4 F36.6 F FSB.5 F36-1 F 2 3b,A F S 1-29.7 F2B 9 F28.F28.5 F25 F F31.6 1`35 FR. B 2-4 F40,5 F39.5 F39.5 40., f 1-3A.G F36.2 F F2B.2 5.1 F16.4 F12-0 .9 1`2.2 .2 `.2 GO,B 0.]4 1`i C'30j.9 015 :S Cl 3 =_.' I d'2.'S 0-2 F via 1 6.2 F1.0 0.3 C1.2 C3.3 C3.2 05.9 CL.. 06.3 C6=6 00.9 CID.$ CB. 6 .7:9 3.5 F .3 F35,5. F3B,5 1`38,3 F27,8 F 2 F36,2 "1.- 1`31.5 F30.7 F30.i F „ 1 317 2 .2 1`27. F31.8 F37.7 1`39,1 1`39.2 3.3 F40.4 F'39.4 F .9 1`36.0 F37,7 1`3 :7 F .5 F27.2 1`21.4 9.9 .4 F7-3 F2.4 C1.3 C5.: r.•'.`l 1119.6 019 •t I; 15,G C1,1 4 F3.1 F2.8 FO,6 Co 9 02.9 "3 3 F11,0 F2.B FO. C6.6 C1.9 [ 1 5 C5.6 1:4.:7 C4, 5 1,'5.1 08.0 G10 _ 2.6 1`14.6 26.' 1`38. 1`39,2 6.9 F38.6 F36.0 F37-4 -4. F32.7 F32 3 1`32-0 F .tl 1`32.1 FF29.4 F2fi .5 1`,5.8 F32.7 F=7.5 1`37,0 F37.0 F37-0 Ai.i F. r36.B F35.9 1`36 9.1 F35.9 1`29,5 1`2^c .0 15.6 G.2 F6,1 F3.4 .4 C5.0 2 0 FO d 01.1 0 C3.I G2 2 1=7,1 1`9 1`0.8 01.5 1:4,0 C"e. C13.2 C2.A C4.1 !_' -IA.il 1`]6.5 1`3 1`4 .1 Fdn.2 F40.2 1,39.8 38.0 F.36.3 F34.1 F33,6 1`33. 5.7 1`34- F30.7 F26.9 F24.0 1`2 .6 F27 9 F .9 1`33-0 F.33.3 F33.3 1`3' 4 1'35.9 F36.5 1`34. .3 F 1`35.2 F31.8 F24.8 F17.0 '11.13 .4 F4.F FU- C 5 F C CI 0 0.1 C,3.9 C3 0.7 / Ck. F9,4 F7.5 FO, .7 C3.2 0..3 C1- C1,5 0 1`16. F1B.F F .4 F .6 F41_ F41,1 F40.6 F40.0 F39.5 -3 F35 4 F35.E 1`34." .5 F35.S 1`33.0 F29. 1`24.9 1`22.1 2�a.2 0-6 1`27.5 F�'.9 1`2B.0 1`26,0 25.1 1`31.3 1`33.8 .9 1`35.1 1`33.5 1`3 1`92.3 1`28,3 t4.2 F7,0 FO •C" -� 019 5 '3 2 .4 09.2 0.1 7 „3.51 I;4 ti C3�6 C3.6 C2.g F 1`.G F,. 0.7 U 0.:::'.0 C' 4 1,0,1 15. 1`2 1 F22 9.1 43,2 Fd2.9 1`42.5 F49� 1`40.7 1`3 -i'6�5 F33.5 F36.6 F39 37.6 5 F34 F31.3 F27 -1 24,c^ 1`28 3 30.2 F28,1 1`24.7' F29,9 1`'0. 1 2 Fie,I F22.B 3 1`34.7 F34.6 F33.5 f34.3 1`29. 1`22-9 471 1`'7.2 01.1 2 =t9. C 7 01,3 Cl I C-2 CA 0 2.0 Cl:. '.5 03.3 ('2.8 1.1 F8.6 F• 1 - 0,4 FS9 F .5 F 3 41.3 44.5. a,9 F43.2 F42,6 F41 .6 1`4 "37.A F37 4 F37,0 F35, B 3 1W,1 136.0 F' B F29 5 28-1 F" 3 F26 B 4.9 F25 9 F22I F1B.5 F Fit,0 F11.0 FS F24, F30..7 F31,0 1`2. F F. 9 F ,B 1`7.6 ..9 C.1 5 01.7 (',1.11 C3 B C4 02,1 Ci 9 Cf .S 0.1 t 02.4 F2.7 F7.4 .9 F13,2 F21 Q F3-.0 FA1.7 'F45,3 F44.5" F44,0 3.7 F42.6 F .0 F= F36.2 F37.6 F36.5 F. 0 1`:16.1 F35,3 F34-5 1`30 9 -32 F 9 1 F27.0 F25 5 F22 7 0.2 F19.5 1 FB 0 1`5.3 F3. F" .2 1`17. F 7. 1`21.7 19,1 F .3 1`4. 4.8 L'. 03.2 Cd.3 0.4,' 0.2 3 CI -11 11.4 01,1 CO.B [0,1� 0.1.5. F6. Ft5,6 F20.4 .3.5 F 5.7 F4,0 F44.9 F44.3 F43-7 F43.2 .5 1`41.7 D. F3B.5 1`37.7 1`30.7 6. 1`36 0 1`35.3 1`32.2 1`:4. 1`30.5 1`27.4 25, 1`23.6 1`24,5 F1E'• 8 1`6 a F4,7 1`2.5 '4 1`4.3 1`9 '! 1`1 1`10 1`0.7 1`3. .. F. - 3ry O 0.0.- Cf .9 0.3 3 4,5 Cd ti 0:j.4 C4.A Cd 1 '.3 0.1.4 1`,9.:? (:1 0 00.7 CO. 1`3.5 1`13,4 1`11 4. F.-.1 1`3'.9 1`42. F44.4 1`43.9 1`43.5 1`43.3 1`43 1`42.5 F42 F36,d 1`37.7 136.5 1`35,0 F 7' 33.8 F 8 1`32.7 1`29.5 1`26.6 1`23-A 19. F -.1 1`8.6 1`5.`3 1`5.5 1`1.- 1`2,6 F2 .0 1`6.1 Flt. FO Ct !1 0.1 3 CS 0 cU.6 .0 1:4.3 C9.2 6 CO F1.9 F9-0 F]D=9 F.16.E1 8.4 F 2 40.5 F FA3,5 F43.5 F4 F43.D F42.5 F42,0 A F33.0 F36.0 F35.3 1`32.4 F3Q,2 2 1`30: F20,7 F25 0 5 1 F9,3 FG 5 F5.2 F2.4 .B .3 F6,I tj2 F0.9 Cq,4 1`0.2 .3 C4 .0 C2.3 fi7. 1`2.0 Fd.7. F7 8 F13.5 Ft7. F31. 1`32.2 -35.5 35,3 F o ] F43.2 F43,2 FA2.7 F42.1 41.5 FA0.3 .7 F31.2 F'29 2 F2fi 4 1`24. F 4 14.9 Fit.8 1`8.0 FR 7 1`3 'S FO 03.9 1:li.'! .1 CO.A C2.2 0.6 P3-9 1`1.4 F1516 F17.1 F35.5 F34.2 -32.9 39.0 43.3 F42, 1`42,2 1`41,5 F40.1 F39,6 7 8 3 F' -2A-3 F25 1 F24 2 F20,2 F17.1 F12 7 FB.6 CA 6.3 1`2.3 Cf.. C2.I C6,1 09.4 .150 F0. FO,4 F0.9 ?.?_ 1`3. '.0 F8.3 F10.7 F18, F14.9 F15.4 -iB. F28. F30. F 1 F -,5 F•12,3 F40.9 F4U.0 F" .4 F33,7 F31.5 F30. 5-6 F2Q,9 F29.2 F15.4 Ft0.6 F7 F F4.4 FO. C3.4 G7 C9.b dl.1 C3.'1 F0,6 F3.2 I F7.: Fit.4 F12.7 F13.6 14,8 F14,0 .3 "-8.6 -33. F39.' F40,7 Fall F35.5 F31.0 F30.I F ;4 1`26 d -'2- F1B.1 F15..1 F7.3 F2.9 8 C9.7 C5.91 C -0 CF,.4 ry00 C3.1 y>@ 1`0.6 F2.F F 1`3.3 F7. 12.2 F13.2 F1 8 F12,13 F 4 F, f F34.2 .1 F29.5 F20- F27,8 F22.0 FPO.3 FS 6 F15.A 11 7 F5.B F1 3 C2.A '3 7 C 0 C3. C1.5 F4.7 F1 7 F11.3 F11.. F8.9 F6. f22.4 .4 F21.p 2?- 3 25.3 F29.5 1`21.6 F15.7 F14. F13,9 F12'.1 1`9 1`5.2 FO - C:4.2 C .0 C2,2. CO.. F3,0 F7. F7,6 F7.1 4.6 F2.L FO. 1`9 F7 FS 2 25. F17,5 F12.1 F9.p F7 5 F5.4 F4.7 F2.6 1,3 CA. 0.5 F3.9 F2.7 1`.4 4:. C2.9 F7.5 Fl,_ .O F19.5 F12.1 .8 15.2 F2-2 F0. C �e .0 1, 2.0 02,9 .7 F4.0 1 2 F9.'. F6.3 F2.0 C2.0 C3.3 C2.0 CO 0.5 l_9 f"1,'.1 1`6.9 1y.6 F .3 1`0 3 C -2 0.'CO .. 0 60 SCALE DESIGN SITE D 7�� 1p�� 13 F7.A C CG.4 i' .� .2 F 1 C5,7 C6.7 C5,2 C2. C9.(i C CA.7 CE l,2 L:! 'f U.7 C't4.f C 7 Cl 4 C2.B A.4 07,8 1,..5 C10.1 G13_ :15.2 0..f . C14.'L Cil.7C-.3 CUTFILL F d.4 1`0.7 3 CL1 7 CB.9 CID cl3.5 177 1 017.7 c16 9 015.0 CIS A C[ 6 440 C::, f," 3 ,3 C C3.0 C'i.0 Ct-- LJ. `u [I 5,n l;1/.11 019 C:19�9 C... 7 011 C� F)qAW VOLUME 4 159 f ■ 4099 570 CYS 870 0.4. 01,'/ Cd .9 C7.D S 04,5 05.9 .9 f. 117 ,U 073.0 015.7 CF C20.f 022.2 24 024.3 022,3 G18, C]].Fl0.1 L 1G 5 CYS 2 CI C4.7 06.4 '.,6 011.7 C13. CB 3 (12.' 016.1 B C2P 6 1,'23.2 G27.0 026.9 026.7 C24.A C2 t. 9 Cd.0 9 0 CEDL C13.2 7. 013.7 050.4 C'..0 C11_l .4.5 Cfe,d 56 015.3 017.8.0 L"7_.1 +"_.! C2tE_7 029.2 029.6 C30.0 029,3 C27.5 024.9 J6 C9_:; U; 0.9. C14.2 4.1 014,8 CI0,2 C 5 010,2 C CI C2U.s' :21.5 023,0 0.2 C20`c 114.2 G3F1.7 091.7 032 30,0 029. .P. 02:1 074-4 f..4.7 0 1:14.7 016. Ci6.7 C 6 019.1 A CA .C: CIO.1 020.8 .24.1 C i 0.2 C' ,. C32.0 C33.9 ['33.4 1:33.A .I'S '30,4 030.5 C31 8 C:3 .. C32.9 130.0 C2.0,U C27 :19,1 CO -7 CO. ash r .9 013 1 1:12.0 C1G.5 019 049.6 075.6 2' .5 CP2.1 023.0 024, 0.i C"1`0 0 C21.5 1,`24,::1 ? .[ .. .i.7 035.6 GAG. 8 C36,1 035 3 .4 031,6 032.1 l: 9.13 029,8 C71.Ci C::3a.0 f. .7 C"53.3 031.3 0.2. NOTE: i • BASED O THE J 20 12 AERIAL C^ Cie 7 CL9 5 G15 7 4 C22 5 F,?. 9 C2 3.8 0:3.7 C24 C25 2 027.5 CS 3 0.1 033.7 035.7 C96.I C37 7 32.4 07.3 C I.4 C, i C31.4 032 2 32 C3Q 7 C30.7 7 033.5 --34.7 C-34.9 C 2 ti C 7. C Cl C96.D 0;2].5 G25.d "29 1 C3Q,4 I; IS. 024 3 -,.4 1,'16.5 027 _ C26.5 077,0 0.6 029. f.' -_, C33.5 034.7 037.1 ['3fl.2 36 .7 "3!5.1 029.9 1:30.2 0.:1 B 5;31.2 C (1.9 C3].d '3U.P 031.,' G32.5 3.1 C34.B 1:35.6 C 0.4 0.1:.7 C: ..►RA OF GRADING- 28.62ACRES 0 9 {; 1'SA 2 I'4°i f C3F, 6 E3' 9 038.8 .35.9 035.4 036- 0.2 F 029.5 029,9 30,4 0.3 030,0 031,7 0.3 .4 030-7 031.5 ,32.9 0.3-1 077.11 35 H.6 CB 8 Cl. is SCALE.' 1 " = 60 ' C419EM1 07130113 03: 00 P. M. C 1,15 7 1,'1 7 023.2 629.8 039.1 0.3. 1 C3i ? 0..'9 _ L�,i. t1 1,26 5 l,c G�0.9 .29- - sj 0.2' G C, 4 C32.D 0;14.3 C3A 1 7i L 72 026.6 027,0 2 :iR,2 1,'36.1 1:3F.H 1:37.9 i.5 ,35.7 3.7 034,4 C 5.9 1`,3'.. 035.6 L'315.f 032.9 Ca 0:29.1 CLI.' 030.1 30.3 G:S1.A C' q [29.7 O'31:lL 1:3A.O '36 o 1:31,1 3 040 • 15. CS<7 04.`3 ..I CA. 1 010 A LL"1B.0 .0 3.2 0.5 C29� .33 5 G33.fi 033.3 032,9 .-3. 029 5 F 9. 030.5 C3i.i 034 7 C97.F.V ,37 2 C3B.9 37.5 033,5 034,0 [': .1 CY, 3 036.9 Cita 2 C•. V,1 C2B.5 029 3 030.0 G' I.- 030,8 (1:11.5 C 9.0 130.3 031.7 1,33.7 CG 7 G3B, ti C C. ..,1 C70.f f.:8.n 0.1 1,3 C5.5 1,'.5 CiP,B 020.2 1,.. 7. G3 5 032 8 032.4 C31.0 C31 0 C3QP C29 8 CAD,2 1,31. '"a.1` 094.6 C.' S 037.0 035,5 035.1. C". 3.0 C -...i 3J.6 034.1 C 7 C35.2 C35 7 C31 C2t1 •:8.7 G '.G C9U.3 I,,30.4 0'31.3 0. 1- 029.0 E31-3 033. C. 021 F ,21.2 C 0.1, 0 r I. .9 0'2.5 F3,A�70 1`5. F4.IS F2,5 C f:6,Q 1 1 G17.6 C25.B C25 '' 34 .`.i 031.4 030.7 029.9 026 8 L•2B.6 L"2'.8 f. ,4 C29.9 C 9 C35.A 035.4 C37 C37,B L34.! C32.5 032,8 C'-.2 C33. 1;3A. t 0.3 .D 27.8 ClB.S 1:2]. 0.2. 9 ti:3u,2 Cdi.0 [l.0 t' .d ,19.3 1,4 t ... 7 010.9 C15.7 1.7 C25 8 C26.3 C2i :3 .7 034.2 C29 7 C29.1 C28 .3 027 ,29.3 C25.3 C26 f 031.5 C34.0 C 3 C36,1 C37,O 0.3 .7 1:32.7 032,5 0.32 9 033.0 ''3 .P 033,7 034.:9 029 P 028,1 1`1 7 L'2.A 05.6 04.7 .. ., •, C .0 020.3 C?: C.r^ .. ;2 029-7 029-5 029 4 C26 0 020.0 C27.0 C29 7 '?� 0 L25i.0 C27 Y, 30.9 C 6 {:,-1.1.3 1,'35.1 036.1 'J C3� 031.6 C32.0 ry C 1`1 06.3 L .9 C4,7 C. - 0.1 .0 1,],n M. ,9.f I i _� [32,u C.. -i3..1 1,'3-. 1,'28. E23.7 4.}-.0 03,4 .3 .5 9 Ft6,7-.7 1`13.4 FIQ..1 FG.5 1`2.7 0.1 .,- • .5 C4... C4,7 CB,O 1 .A 019 i C' -7? C30 4 CY) 0 029.7 C29 C? '.;�.G 026 6 ,;:-.1 024.0 C23.2 22 .. 0'25.5 C29.5 Citi, '33.•1 C.d 4 1;34.6 035.6 C 5.5 C31 2 Cil1.`i C31.8 023.5 C 0.7.-0 E.],I'1 F]') 110. -2U 3 1`22 1`20 B 1`18,3 1`75 Q Fk3.5 1`10 5 1`6.14 '2 7 'S.B 1:7.3 1,11.'? 05.1 1,9,8 CSA, 073.6 013.0 0.7. 1,5.1 3. 7B0 -. " ... - ,.y" .- - 0. 3 '�6.F C2Fi e G20.b 027.0 0^2.,' G22.2 0.'2] 8 C 1`:',...0 026-7 7 1'7::: .!i t','J3..=. 1:3d.2 C15.F+. 3.7 '30.2 027- +., ..� 019.8 Si.S ., 7,d .4 .4 1`25,6 fi 0 1`24.4 F22.8 2}.,G 1`38.6 F-15.3 - 6 1`10.6 1`6 7 F. .3 1,'1 7 CY 5 Cf2 6 CP.4 1,'t-' Cill .3 f:'ES 07.5 .1 CE3. 019.0 C23.F C24.9 F; 2 6 C10.0 L .6.1` 0.6 Cb .2 GO.. '110,0 1,1,3,7 _ ,x.3.6 L2B,3 C30.A 030.7 28 02.1 ... C1f.6 0.1 CS6.3.3 C A. CIO 71` .q 4.9.' e 014.7 L'12.A C 7.1 Cif},4 f.l0,d C' .1 018,7 021.5 025.:3 024,0 e2 026.6 C._",7 027 G2G.1 14. 027.3 L' a -A �1. 9 020.1 [17 021.3 C27,4 0311,0 C32.0 0;33 0.3=4.3 C 2 027,0 I" .4 017 - CA.: F F_ 1`19.4 F27.d F. F26.4 F27 B 7.4 F26 7 F23,5 1`'1 7 F19 9 F17.3 F'11.7 9.. 1`1 0.7 C1`l. I? Cto. 9 C4,8 05 6 .7 Ct1.5 C18.3 C1l_1 Q C2 .700 .- - ��. a - 0..'7 G CfA.O 010.1 021,(1 C2a .3.9 C25.�. _2A.5 025.9 0.2 .0 C27.iJ ::: 027.3 027.3 Cr- .2 Ct7 4 077,9 097.4 0'7.0 07.0 029-5 092.0 C.� [:29.9 ''. .A 0.]7, 0.3, A ,3 F 1`30. 0 1`29.2 1`28 1`26-7 F2A,3 1`22 .3 5 14.1 1`70.3 FS.B 1`1 03.6 Fq F .p ',9 6 0.1.0 06.2 16.4 C12, [:1 6 10.0 CL0.S1 090.6 616.7 022.9 020,5 C32.3 [31 _i 026,6 r. H 1,17.3 016,3 .1 C12.6 Cll 4 0..3. C 1 7� - C.' I' a i 023 7 74.4 0.2 - .26.'.i ''7.7 C=' 1,27.3 02[.9 G2t5. :15,3 CI!-', 3 C1Ci,0 1,'1 ! C74.B C. 17.9 099.5 1,'20, [:76. 0.2, 3.7 3.5 .1 agv.�D.9 F _ 1`33.4 1`3 F34,p 1`32.9 F32� 1`33,-0 1`33.4 1`32 1 2B 124 F F2].O FlB 7 1`15 4 177.3 16.1 FO CS.A 7 F2 04.0 C.fE 1,13.7 CS3.5 013.3 C15 • C:;I .'.11 17..1 Ct3,9 (37. 1 C21.9 C29.5 C2C.9 L" GfA.4 11".T 017. (:111,9 056.1 CY9.3 07.0 .•9 -�] .2�. - b� 8 C 7.0 1',17.1 019- 027,7 ,I C24.s (;24.0 C26.1 C�7 028.9 C2F - ':±5.9 C25.A C 3.1 '12,4 C12.'.i C11.'a f. C14,6' 3.7 .9 F6,0 r,,5 ...3 1.1` F r_ 1`34 1`34.5 F35,6 F36 0 F36.P F36.0 F33,5 X9.5 .9 1`27.6 F29.B 728 9 F23.5 F r GLE 0 019-2 023.- C22�5 024.3 C:I.E - 023 2 _; 7.!1 .15.3 Cl6.7 022- 9•l C97�4 097.0 016. CS€../; .9 3 L; 1'9.2 018.0 018.4 '.3 .l . f P'17 -EI 619.1 ._! 022 '022,2 023.3 C; 5 023 ] C- 28,5 C 4 C25,C C24.fi 0.1 110-2 011. CG. 0.2, 70 1`12.8 F25, 1`3:. 1`37 137.9 'F 36.5 1`36.4 " 7.6 1`37,9 1`37.51`22.9 F2.3,7 F'24 B F25,6 ..7 1`2 .9 F. ! .9 Fl., 2 CIO I} [, 53.7 C28,6 C:)1-4 0.: ).9 C�.'6.5 L2f (i 0.,3 3 :e ,3 CS'".G C15 G CIO -7 19.1 C1 B.5 Cf8.6 015.9 C15.9 010 -18-•1 0:1.9,4 C'19.7 C20.0 L2Q.2 .0 C1B.1 S.7 C1�.� 019.. _ I . a _ r C 7 Cts 9 1,`77.0 1 4 0.2;_ '3 G21 .2 027,3 '2A '2G .5 C24.6 024.2 CF 9 '7-3 i:7 7 CF F 14,8 F .3 1` 5.3 F '.0 38-7 F3 F39.B F39.8 F40-3 1`3 F3;},y .3 3 F26.f 1`22.1 F18,3 F17,9 FI' 1 4 1`22.0 1`24.9 h2•I 6 F. .2 F F'fB6 r1.6 C27 r .7 031 :16.6 012.6 G93.3 074.1 ..7 CS7,2 011.9 018.5 L.. ifi .0 018,1 C1B.9 020.5 Cii,7 [.]7.' Cf7,_ B. Lf 8.1 L1l.0 1.17-., [, 6 17. - � a .4,1`] [: .7 C�7 2 [;3d C38.1Y ,31,1.2 3� 0 �3 -6 A 1`0 r - f C18.A C C1B.3 C19,3 021,1 20.3 17.5 017,9 016 C19,d 17.6 Clfi 018.] 071).6 19,6 C:'. G20.0 020.0 8.3 C19.3 C28.3 C2 C2A-9 E IS 06.9 0'.5.0 Cb A3 1`U.? �W 18.5 1`26 1`35. F .5 1`41.5 Fd1.5 F 1`i FAf .9 1`41.7 .` ,5 F34 .6 1`30.1 F24.Q FIS -2 1 F Ff4.D VIA F15,1 1`17.0 F1B.7 F 9 A 12 1 f `7.11. 2. [;10.7 -21.` (:: 1-1 037.•1 0:70. L3B. � ,37.p t3� fl 1,11 3 L1(V.9 [,11,3 012, ' Ctd,S .I.7 3.8 _ J CIA.1 0..1 GE9.5 '18-5 C19 Q 0.1 cit., E- 011.3 ,6.6 G2,' L;1.1 C3. r, = i F17.2 F25.2 F33.4 '40 , 1`4 F43,2 F'42.6 F42.5 3.5 1 F39.A F35,6 F31.1 1`2 5.d F12 4 F9.7 F9.0 F9.0 F'-9.5 F9.9 F12,0 F 2.6 FS 7 FO .13 :� 5 C.33.0 0.3 4 C 0,9 0.4 .5 0..4 FI [:301.3 -13.9 09.2 (:9 6 011.0 3.4 [;13_ 012.3 Ci3.2 013.5 :' 3.`} 037.3 +� -.., 1 .3. C'U_D 0.2 G76.3 '19,4 CiG r 010.3 CiA,6 -' `' 7d0 -I 7 C20.: '7.5 01'7,8 1,'9 018.6 CIA 0..1,6 029,5 1.1:1,8 _1 C]C3.3 03,4 1`3. 0,9 F C0.5 00.8 .5 F .3 F3f..8 F-18 „ 42,5 F42, 3.7 F43.5 f 4 .3 F39,A 1`3613 F'3 7 1`22.0 FI 1`90.5 h'B. F5 �a 1`4.0 F4.0 3 F5.1 F5.9 5.7 F.4 GO 017 8 03.0 032.7 038.7 V. Il C'�:I [.1.0 1,.3.1 + C.i.7 i;r. 07.7 08.5 0.`1.-. 012.11 0.7 012.1 093,2 C'i3.9 014.7 015.3 011.1 01`.1.'3 '.18.b 1.'11., 1 1 rz. b❑ - 015.0 Cl [:1f1.9 C'19.0 0.'2 0 019,6 C2C.0 C 9,/ 017.0 1'17.7 Cie. C 9 c;,1.0 C22.1 021.7 020.' C CA F1.5.5 18.3 F 1`17.7 F13 1 F5.9 .6 F2.0 1`1, F7 A F26.!,� 1`35.8 f-4 .6 F49.9 F44.0 F44. -45, 4 .3 1`40.4 F36,8 F' .2 1`27.4 1`22.3 F16.5 Fit ,2 79.9 FD. _ F0,2 FD.fi ' ..1 C d.6 I' 7.'3 C .1 .7 : 3. i'.:] .19.7 C- i A .29.5 1`.6 1 0.5 3 CG.3 .13.8 0.9. C 03.3 070.6 012.2 013.5 2 - / ❑ (f / C: .1 C f Fi_3 "73.9 C3D.G 455. 037.4 33. C. 0 08.8 G€i G .7 0.5. C7.I .O 06,4 C9. 9 031.5 013.0 G14.5 117.tS Cf .6 C .0 021.1 1:20,0 I'r1 .5 C2.1.t7 i.A 016.9 C B.G 021.] 024.8 ] I:Ei. 1`22 F 1`21.5 F2P .2 1`73.9 1`19.3 Fit .7 1`7:1`42 7 .7 F46.0 P44.9' F43.4 F'. 1. F3B.8 F34.A 27 1`21.9 1`19.. F15,7 F10.0 F4.8 C3.E. L CS.0 1`;S .O C2.ti 1 ep C16.A 015,5 .0 021.0 C 2C21.4 021.5 1..0 C.16,5 C19,5 C20.1 C19 02,11 D F2U. 1`2. 1`25. F24.5 F24 5F24.5 F24.2 1`22. 16, '12.5. F10,5 FO .7 1`12. 32.. 1`41.3 FAA.2 1`43.2 FA2, F41.7 F'7. F32.7 1`27.6 F .6 1`19.2 1`75.1 Ff I.. 1`'1 3 F9-2 .8 F3-2 C3.0 C6. 6 CS.d; C(I,7 1A.7 G. C2B,6 33.3 1,'3 31` 2 c .f, 4.7 C2�1 04.6 Lv �.7 0.7.. 06.6 07.0 09.5 010.6 092,3 0.1 3 .- 0.1COCS 014,'7 0.17.6 L. J.9 C21,1 C20.9 C21.5 C20. 075.6 C17.4 F J F ' 15.9 1`'27.4 1`26-0 fLIVU 2 126.5 F25.8 1`25.0 1`2..4 F l,B F15.6 F13.f i ..6 29. F39,0 F 4,3 F41.9 F39,5 1`37.2 �.4.5 31.2 F29.1 1`,. 22.5 FIB,8 F15,5 FID -5 F 3 1`1.2 C2.3 G3.9 C5. ]' 1,'.5. 2.0 l 028.0 21] =1 (..! 6 (:�. f:1i, .1 l.0 9 LC -A 1 1,5.7 05.3 CO.G9C 09.9 C1D,6 .` _ 3.3 F .0 23.A 1`'2 ,9 1`30,3 -2 1`30.0 f29,A F28.D 26.4 P2$.5 1` 2 F .a 1`18.6 1`17 A, F F .A 10. Fbp,3 1`42. 1`42.7 IFAO.2 F36 G I'3D.G 1`27.7 1`24, F 1`18,1 1`13.7 1`9,1 F 1`[1, C :i -.7 05.4 P_ 09.0 04,3 016.. (;79 ,20 .7 Ci'. - C d.1`'+ C .6 CE+.7 '9.0 CA 03,2 C4,2 C7.2 09,5 Cl 4 1:12.8 10.0 2,4 ClC15.7 CSA. <:21�1 9.5 C19.5 C16.2 A.1 C2,3 C2:,6 L 05.7 06.9 t:11.f, Ci'. C71),2 011. C13.2 1:15.3 11.4 020.- is C17. 2 10,6 F30 F .0 F32,5 F32.5 F32.5 31.1 F29.5 F28.0 1`26 '..9 1`20.2 Fig 1`79.8 F 1`.I 10,5 F42.1 F41,6 1`41.7 F41.s 1`39.9 - F25,4 F21.2 F 9. 15.5 FS1: F6.7 r 1`0. C4,3 C7.5 -.5 ,.6 4.5 Cu 1,'92.3 015.' 1:15 _ 0.7.] 1. 1;15.8 96.0 I; 1r.4 F .5 FO'.6 1,'0.: 0.`.i 5 - �y9 s� b 1 " i:4. ;3.3 02.3 02,3 02.3 03,5 C 7 L']7.•I C9.1i 09,8 1:14.1 "11.4 012.2 [:1-.5. ' 1,'15.3 0.3. 1`'9, 1`12. F .7 : 4.1` 1`34.2 1`]1 i.7 1`33,5 F32.6 1`32. 1`'71. '.6.' 1`23.4 1`21.9 1`20,`3 1`19.0 F-" 25 F .3 1`42.4 1'42.E 1`47.4 1`39.6 1`3. .5 1`29,3 F;74.f 2 .1 1`18.6 1`14.0 A.A FA.B 62. 1, C1.S1 06.1 0.9.' 05.9 03.0 .4 013.0 C aU 0 [: 1E.;1 r.9. 12.7 Y- 1 .2 1`10.5 1`3 0 1`5, S 1.�� 1,10,3 0,12, .lA, CIA f 0:74.1 Ci. P5 6 59.7 Fit 9 F2 Me .2 ci 3 C1.3 01,13 C2,7 CA. i7 09.1 CJ ' ca.a C9,3 C9-7 1, .3 et$.1 L"12,2 1 F1D F14 2.2 35.0 F35.3 1`35-6 F35. F34.0 1`33. 1`20.3 1'26.1 F24.2 F22,7 1`21.' F F ,7 41 F40.5 FAC 2 O. 1`42.1 FA 1,5 F 9 1`35,5 1`34.0 F 4. 21,1 F17.7 1`12.6 1`7.5 '1.3 C3.2 L'7.A CB.6 02.6 '1"i C 4 i .1 012 l 3 5 53.9 1`2.5 1`10.6 1`7.9 :1`d 1`0. C0.7 01.5 C3 4 C4.3 7 Cti. `, C7.5 08.2 C8 3 C6.6 CG.O .050.2 F _6 F 34.4 F36.6 F FSB.5 F36-1 F 2 3b,A F S 1-29.7 F2B 9 F28.F28.5 F25 F F31.6 1`35 FR. B 2-4 F40,5 F39.5 F39.5 40., f 1-3A.G F36.2 F F2B.2 5.1 F16.4 F12-0 .9 1`2.2 .2 `.2 GO,B 0.]4 1`i C'30j.9 015 :S Cl 3 =_.' I d'2.'S 0-2 F via 1 6.2 F1.0 0.3 C1.2 C3.3 C3.2 05.9 CL.. 06.3 C6=6 00.9 CID.$ CB. 6 .7:9 3.5 F .3 F35,5. F3B,5 1`38,3 F27,8 F 2 F36,2 "1.- 1`31.5 F30.7 F30.i F „ 1 317 2 .2 1`27. F31.8 F37.7 1`39,1 1`39.2 3.3 F40.4 F'39.4 F .9 1`36.0 F37,7 1`3 :7 F .5 F27.2 1`21.4 9.9 .4 F7-3 F2.4 C1.3 C5.: r.•'.`l 1119.6 019 •t I; 15,G C1,1 4 F3.1 F2.8 FO,6 Co 9 02.9 "3 3 F11,0 F2.B FO. C6.6 C1.9 [ 1 5 C5.6 1:4.:7 C4, 5 1,'5.1 08.0 G10 _ 2.6 1`14.6 26.' 1`38. 1`39,2 6.9 F38.6 F36.0 F37-4 -4. F32.7 F32 3 1`32-0 F .tl 1`32.1 FF29.4 F2fi .5 1`,5.8 F32.7 F=7.5 1`37,0 F37.0 F37-0 Ai.i F. r36.B F35.9 1`36 9.1 F35.9 1`29,5 1`2^c .0 15.6 G.2 F6,1 F3.4 .4 C5.0 2 0 FO d 01.1 0 C3.I G2 2 1=7,1 1`9 1`0.8 01.5 1:4,0 C"e. C13.2 C2.A C4.1 !_' -IA.il 1`]6.5 1`3 1`4 .1 Fdn.2 F40.2 1,39.8 38.0 F.36.3 F34.1 F33,6 1`33. 5.7 1`34- F30.7 F26.9 F24.0 1`2 .6 F27 9 F .9 1`33-0 F.33.3 F33.3 1`3' 4 1'35.9 F36.5 1`34. .3 F 1`35.2 F31.8 F24.8 F17.0 '11.13 .4 F4.F FU- C 5 F C CI 0 0.1 C,3.9 C3 0.7 / Ck. F9,4 F7.5 FO, .7 C3.2 0..3 C1- C1,5 0 1`16. F1B.F F .4 F .6 F41_ F41,1 F40.6 F40.0 F39.5 -3 F35 4 F35.E 1`34." .5 F35.S 1`33.0 F29. 1`24.9 1`22.1 2�a.2 0-6 1`27.5 F�'.9 1`2B.0 1`26,0 25.1 1`31.3 1`33.8 .9 1`35.1 1`33.5 1`3 1`92.3 1`28,3 t4.2 F7,0 FO •C" -� 019 5 '3 2 .4 09.2 0.1 7 „3.51 I;4 ti C3�6 C3.6 C2.g F 1`.G F,. 0.7 U 0.:::'.0 C' 4 1,0,1 15. 1`2 1 F22 9.1 43,2 Fd2.9 1`42.5 F49� 1`40.7 1`3 -i'6�5 F33.5 F36.6 F39 37.6 5 F34 F31.3 F27 -1 24,c^ 1`28 3 30.2 F28,1 1`24.7' F29,9 1`'0. 1 2 Fie,I F22.B 3 1`34.7 F34.6 F33.5 f34.3 1`29. 1`22-9 471 1`'7.2 01.1 2 =t9. C 7 01,3 Cl I C-2 CA 0 2.0 Cl:. '.5 03.3 ('2.8 1.1 F8.6 F• 1 - 0,4 FS9 F .5 F 3 41.3 44.5. a,9 F43.2 F42,6 F41 .6 1`4 "37.A F37 4 F37,0 F35, B 3 1W,1 136.0 F' B F29 5 28-1 F" 3 F26 B 4.9 F25 9 F22I F1B.5 F Fit,0 F11.0 FS F24, F30..7 F31,0 1`2. F F. 9 F ,B 1`7.6 ..9 C.1 5 01.7 (',1.11 C3 B C4 02,1 Ci 9 Cf .S 0.1 t 02.4 F2.7 F7.4 .9 F13,2 F21 Q F3-.0 FA1.7 'F45,3 F44.5" F44,0 3.7 F42.6 F .0 F= F36.2 F37.6 F36.5 F. 0 1`:16.1 F35,3 F34-5 1`30 9 -32 F 9 1 F27.0 F25 5 F22 7 0.2 F19.5 1 FB 0 1`5.3 F3. F" .2 1`17. F 7. 1`21.7 19,1 F .3 1`4. 4.8 L'. 03.2 Cd.3 0.4,' 0.2 3 CI -11 11.4 01,1 CO.B [0,1� 0.1.5. F6. Ft5,6 F20.4 .3.5 F 5.7 F4,0 F44.9 F44.3 F43-7 F43.2 .5 1`41.7 D. F3B.5 1`37.7 1`30.7 6. 1`36 0 1`35.3 1`32.2 1`:4. 1`30.5 1`27.4 25, 1`23.6 1`24,5 F1E'• 8 1`6 a F4,7 1`2.5 '4 1`4.3 1`9 '! 1`1 1`10 1`0.7 1`3. .. F. - 3ry O 0.0.- Cf .9 0.3 3 4,5 Cd ti 0:j.4 C4.A Cd 1 '.3 0.1.4 1`,9.:? (:1 0 00.7 CO. 1`3.5 1`13,4 1`11 4. F.-.1 1`3'.9 1`42. F44.4 1`43.9 1`43.5 1`43.3 1`43 1`42.5 F42 F36,d 1`37.7 136.5 1`35,0 F 7' 33.8 F 8 1`32.7 1`29.5 1`26.6 1`23-A 19. F -.1 1`8.6 1`5.`3 1`5.5 1`1.- 1`2,6 F2 .0 1`6.1 Flt. FO Ct !1 0.1 3 CS 0 cU.6 .0 1:4.3 C9.2 6 CO F1.9 F9-0 F]D=9 F.16.E1 8.4 F 2 40.5 F FA3,5 F43.5 F4 F43.D F42.5 F42,0 A F33.0 F36.0 F35.3 1`32.4 F3Q,2 2 1`30: F20,7 F25 0 5 1 F9,3 FG 5 F5.2 F2.4 .B .3 F6,I tj2 F0.9 Cq,4 1`0.2 .3 C4 .0 C2.3 fi7. 1`2.0 Fd.7. F7 8 F13.5 Ft7. F31. 1`32.2 -35.5 35,3 F o ] F43.2 F43,2 FA2.7 F42.1 41.5 FA0.3 .7 F31.2 F'29 2 F2fi 4 1`24. F 4 14.9 Fit.8 1`8.0 FR 7 1`3 'S FO 03.9 1:li.'! .1 CO.A C2.2 0.6 P3-9 1`1.4 F1516 F17.1 F35.5 F34.2 -32.9 39.0 43.3 F42, 1`42,2 1`41,5 F40.1 F39,6 7 8 3 F' -2A-3 F25 1 F24 2 F20,2 F17.1 F12 7 FB.6 CA 6.3 1`2.3 Cf.. C2.I C6,1 09.4 .150 F0. FO,4 F0.9 ?.?_ 1`3. '.0 F8.3 F10.7 F18, F14.9 F15.4 -iB. F28. F30. F 1 F -,5 F•12,3 F40.9 F4U.0 F" .4 F33,7 F31.5 F30. 5-6 F2Q,9 F29.2 F15.4 Ft0.6 F7 F F4.4 FO. C3.4 G7 C9.b dl.1 C3.'1 F0,6 F3.2 I F7.: Fit.4 F12.7 F13.6 14,8 F14,0 .3 "-8.6 -33. F39.' F40,7 Fall F35.5 F31.0 F30.I F ;4 1`26 d -'2- F1B.1 F15..1 F7.3 F2.9 8 C9.7 C5.91 C -0 CF,.4 ry00 C3.1 y>@ 1`0.6 F2.F F 1`3.3 F7. 12.2 F13.2 F1 8 F12,13 F 4 F, f F34.2 .1 F29.5 F20- F27,8 F22.0 FPO.3 FS 6 F15.A 11 7 F5.B F1 3 C2.A '3 7 C 0 C3. C1.5 F4.7 F1 7 F11.3 F11.. F8.9 F6. f22.4 .4 F21.p 2?- 3 25.3 F29.5 1`21.6 F15.7 F14. F13,9 F12'.1 1`9 1`5.2 FO - C:4.2 C .0 C2,2. CO.. F3,0 F7. F7,6 F7.1 4.6 F2.L FO. 1`9 F7 FS 2 25. F17,5 F12.1 F9.p F7 5 F5.4 F4.7 F2.6 1,3 CA. 0.5 F3.9 F2.7 1`.4 4:. C2.9 F7.5 Fl,_ .O F19.5 F12.1 .8 15.2 F2-2 F0. C �e .0 1, 2.0 02,9 .7 F4.0 1 2 F9.'. F6.3 F2.0 C2.0 C3.3 C2.0 CO 0.5 l_9 f"1,'.1 1`6.9 1y.6 F .3 1`0 3 C -2 0.'CO .. 0 LANDSCAPE/BERM AND FENCE TO PROVIDE BUFFER FROM BREA � r 4k: � � • CANYON ROAD EXISTING FLOOD CONTROLCHANNEL SECTION II t CA: e SECTION A -A SCALE 1 =20 , 'SITE D' ARK SITE OPEN SPACE PARK WITH BENCH GAZEBO AND PICNIC - PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN FACILITIES CITY OF DIAMOND BAR CALIFORNIA ' SCALE: 1" - 40'_0" SUMMERS//MURPHY & PARTNERS, INC. HOMES C � ARCHITECTS C S 34997 COAST HIGHWAY, SUITE 200 5 ENTERPRISE, SUITE 300, IRVINE, CA 92655 DANA POINT, CALIFORNIA 92629 (949) 443-9446 NORTH 0 40 80 120 160 DATE: 7131/2013 SNIP # PROJECT PROF/LES (VERTICAL & HORIZONTAL SCALE: V" 60') LEGEND VIEW PROFILE #1 VIEW PROFILE #4 ----- NATURAL GROUND DESIGN GROUND 2 PROPOSED GRADING PROJECT BOUNDARY LINE TOP OF SLOPE 840 800 760 720 680 640 u�V Summar 800 Soo- 760 7s 720 720 240 280 320 MSE WALL MSE A OSED PMSE OWAL POSED RETAINING WALL HEIGHT 31 NING WALL - a� P / 1 \ 800 660 CENTERLINE 1009 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK 5,140 DW PROPOSED WATER 640 � RETOA CLUSTER UNITS XISTIN :.z � 00 h O ENHANCED PAVEMENT p 5 PROPOSED SEWER OPOSE " a 8 ST. .PLAN 3 29 PROPOSED -SD- PROPOSED STORM DRAIN .,Lr v 6.0'- 720 5' RIK RETAINING WALL/ 4-PLEX 2 FIRE HYDRANT 40 ---- PROPOSED '16-18 SUBTOTAL 61 18 182 4,924 PR Lot 10 PROPOSED pl ml ADE - lO WON,' BLVD. MSE ALL P Pad + 7082- _- ;P.d=76 46 5,683 - - 0 . xisi 47 ----- EXI ---- TING G --- - ADE -z ad=757.. ---- "A" ST. Pad 60.0* 26 0' Pa =766.0' m P PROPOSED GRADE 4645 28 6,414 PRC POSED MSE WAI LPadI Lot 49 Lot 441 GR d=711 2 > N ¢ I N I� hm p PR POSED MSE W LL _ + Lot PROW "A"S ED . - Pad= + PROP 'A' ED T. ad=774. s Lot 2 ,- Lot 4 Lot 24 ____ ____ mi0i p ---_ km -- I ROPOS 11.N D PROPOSED MSE ALL _____!ROPOSFD ACCESS OND BAR PROPOSED AC __ ESS ---- PR P ACCESS ---- SED ---- ---- - - - =727.5 --- ------- ---- ---- -------------- ' BLVD. j ------ Lot 6 -- ---- ---- E EXISTING STING o_ ARK I XISTIN ---- ---- 1 1 ---------+ _ry2 C BREA N. RD. I BREA CY . CHANNEL i _ RAIN 'PARK ,,-- RDEN BASIN P - d-7083 Lot 1 PROP Pad- L 08.6- t 1 WALL Pad=7 Lot 7.8' Pad= L 07.4' 1 ISTINC GROUNDM P OPOSE RETAIN NG WA PR L POSED GRADE r: p m 40 RO 190 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680 720 760 800 840 880 920 960 1000 1040 1080 1120 7760 1200 1240 1280 7320 1360 7400 1440 1480 1520 1560 16 u�V Summar 800 Soo- 760 7s 720 720 u�V Summar N ¢ pPad--754A"ST. PLAN TYPE # OF BLDGS. p PROPOSED F' H' LOT LINE 240 280 320 MSE WALL MSE A OSED PMSE OWAL POSED RETAINING WALL HEIGHT 31 NING WALL - a� P / 1 \ 800 660 CENTERLINE 1009 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK 5,140 DW PROPOSED WATER 640 � RETOA CLUSTER UNITS XISTIN :.z � 00 h O ENHANCED PAVEMENT p 5 PROPOSED SEWER OPOSE " a 8 ST. .PLAN 3 29 PROPOSED -SD- PROPOSED STORM DRAIN .,Lr v 6.0'- 720 5' RIK RETAINING WALL/ 4-PLEX 2 FIRE HYDRANT 40 ---- PROPOSED '16-18 SUBTOTAL 61 18 182 4,924 PR Lot 10 PROPOSED pl ml ADE - lO WON,' BLVD. MSE ALL P Pad + 7082- _- ;P.d=76 46 5,683 - - 0 . xisi 47 ----- EXI ---- TING G --- - ADE -z ad=757.. ---- "A" ST. Pad 60.0* 26 0' Pa =766.0' m P ADO R. 4645 28 6,414 Si of Lot 1 1 4,763 Lot 49 Lot 441 GR d=711 u�V Summar N ¢ pPad--754A"ST. PLAN TYPE # OF BLDGS. p PROPOSED F' H' LOT LINE 240 280 320 MSE WALL MSE A OSED PMSE OWAL POSED RETAINING WALL HEIGHT 31 NING WALL - EASEMENT LINE P / 1 \ 800 660 CENTERLINE 1009 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK 5,140 DW PROPOSED WATER 640 � 4,857 CLUSTER UNITS XISTIN :.z � 00 Iq ENHANCED PAVEMENT 750 5 PROPOSED SEWER OPOSE " a 8 ST. .PLAN 3 29 PROPOSED -SD- PROPOSED STORM DRAIN .,Lr v 6.0'- 720 5' RIK RETAINING WALL/ 4-PLEX 2 FIRE HYDRANT / , n v 'r?r1 Ll Ala. 25DDI ' 60x70 LOT V/C/N/TY MAP .. 00 \\\ AO \ PROPOSED 8' / NOTES VIEW PROFILE #2 �p _ - - NATURAL ND PROPOSED GRADING A V A SIDEWALK , Boo- 760 - 680 00 _ _ _ \ \ \ F \ TO BE RELOCATED SINGLE FA MIL Y \ 7C EX. POWER POLE 760 Tz0 680 Summar N ¢ pPad--754A"ST. PLAN TYPE # OF BLDGS. p PROPOSED F' H' 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 PMSE OWAL POSED RETAINING WALL HEIGHT 31 PLAN 1 24 24 511 P / 1 \ SEWER DRAIN LOW PLOW MP -40 MEDIA FILTER 660 47 1009 SINGLE FAMILY 5,140 / DIVERSION STRUCTURE TREATMENT BMP 640 � 4,857 CLUSTER UNITS XISTIN :.z � 00 PLAN 1 18 I� lope a / , n v 'r?r1 Ll Ala. 25DDI ' 60x70 LOT V/C/N/TY MAP .. 00 \\\ AO \ PROPOSED 8' / NOTES VIEW PROFILE #2 �p _ - - NATURAL ND PROPOSED GRADING A V A SIDEWALK , Boo- 760 - 680 00 _ _ _ \ \ \ F \ TO BE RELOCATED SINGLE FA MIL Y \ 7C EX. POWER POLE 760 Tz0 680 � i 760 V A O EX R/W b' t06 'F? ' ' Al � v A A EX, CURB &� o � ,T, o PITCH• ry /� �PROPOSED CURB �m R m 2"erNL 720 \ \\ \ \ \ PROPOSED R/W go \ \ -EXISTING 8"" SEWER \ \ ` / 0 �X, SIGNAGE TO BE RELOC9TED ,� 1R5 \�\ RL 680 •,,\ o 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680 .720 760 800. 840 880. 920 960. 1000 1040 1080 1120 \� o - �• / Ps �`' \�` Y _r ) y n \\ CONNECT 70 EX. 10" ACP WATER 8�`�p' ^ / •.:.- 90 35 / 5 \ \\ m l r�r� l Alii. 32D i EXISTING 8 SEWER R \ $ 9 VIEW PROFILE #3 PROPOSED GRADING A'\`BP V-9 )y r' BaoNATURAL PROPOSED MEDIAN p O,` &., / 15 RrN 5 \ r \ �\ dJ IYJ-J JAM, J� ✓� �J 7'0 -58 ^ w 800" 760 720 680 Summar N ¢ pPad--754A"ST. PLAN TYPE # OF BLDGS. p PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY S.F 6 DETACHED 60X70 30 PMSE OWAL POSED 5,295 31 PLAN 1 24 24 511 P "A" ST 491 SUBTOTAL 47 1009 SINGLE FAMILY 5,140 34 _-------- 11 4,857 CLUSTER UNITS XISTIN :.z � 00 PLAN 1 18 I� lope a /r --------------------------------------- 16 OPOSE " a 8 ST. .PLAN 3 29 PROPOSED 401 SUBTOTAL Pad=7 6.0'- MULTI -FAMILY UNITS 39 4,462 4-PLEX 2 8 40 ---- Lots - '16-18 SUBTOTAL 61 18 182 4,924 PR Lot 10 PROPOSED 5,159 ADE - 5,022 WON,' BLVD. 5,347 of 29 ' Pad + 7082- _- 5,731 46 5,683 - - 0 . 5,419 47 ----- EXI ---- TING G --- - ADE -z - -- ---- - WALL 5,911 26 _ a 50 m 27 15 631 -- 4645 28 6,414 Si 5,160 Lot 1 1 4,763 � i 760 V A O EX R/W b' t06 'F? ' ' Al � v A A EX, CURB &� o � ,T, o PITCH• ry /� �PROPOSED CURB �m R m 2"erNL 720 \ \\ \ \ \ PROPOSED R/W go \ \ -EXISTING 8"" SEWER \ \ ` / 0 �X, SIGNAGE TO BE RELOC9TED ,� 1R5 \�\ RL 680 •,,\ o 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680 .720 760 800. 840 880. 920 960. 1000 1040 1080 1120 \� o - �• / Ps �`' \�` Y _r ) y n \\ CONNECT 70 EX. 10" ACP WATER 8�`�p' ^ / •.:.- 90 35 / 5 \ \\ m l r�r� l Alii. 32D i EXISTING 8 SEWER R \ $ 9 VIEW PROFILE #3 PROPOSED GRADING A'\`BP V-9 )y r' BaoNATURAL PROPOSED MEDIAN p O,` &., / 15 RrN 5 \ r \ �\ dJ IYJ-J JAM, J� ✓� �J 7'0 -58 ^ w 800" 760 720 680 840 <O\ Z '. S`p1PM Y,yps1 , `�\• o> > s 3y8'\ \ Nei EX SIGNAGE TO BE = �-1 gym\ To BE RELOCATED 800 lrStl\i:l AIL- 331411y o S a �R' � 0 „+ � AA• ROti I v PROPOSED SIGNAL .QW o y ® s N • 1V• ps11 o i� cn� CONNECT TO EXISTING R" 7s6 10" s _ r 1\5 20� s. '�\ \♦ r P' 6 o �kd ". pgRpONDP 1� i 720 v W 65 - .� St IRA \ w .. ps12 . r �l (y ps1395 \ ----R \p WSMt BUILDING SUMMARY Vo 30" LANDS P s 7 .^ 9 2 P 10 g No � Summar I of Areas PLAN TYPE # OF BLDGS. # OF UNITS X OF TOTAL SINGLE FAMILY S.F 6 DETACHED 60X70 30 5,127 CLUSTER UNITS 5,295 31 PLAN 1 24 24 511 PLAN 2 23 23 491 SUBTOTAL 47 1009 SINGLE FAMILY 5,140 34 CONDOMINIUMS 11 4,857 CLUSTER UNITS 4,235 12 PLAN 1 18 18 251 PLAN 2 26 16 351 .PLAN 3 29 PROPOSED 401 SUBTOTAL Pad=7 6.0'- MULTI -FAMILY UNITS 39 4,462 4-PLEX 2 8 40 6-PLEX 9 a oe OW SUBTOTAL 61 18 OTAL # OF UNITS 182 4,924 PR POSED 43 5,159 20 5,022 "A" ST 5,347 of 29 30 45 5,297 _- 5,731 46 5,683 23 5,419 47 4,169 EXIS ING DE 4,808 25 MS WALL 5,911 26 _ a 50 5466 27 15 631 -- 4645 28 6,414 Si 5,160 29 1 4,763 GR I� hm p Lot 9 - (STING __----- -- ____ ____ --- -- ---_ --- -- Lr 04 S DI OND BAR . - - P OPOSE pa =727.5 BLVD. j Pates 25' Pa =7220* "e" ST. 1 1 PROP SED RE AINING WALL P OPOSE RETAIN NG WA PR L POSED GRADE m 840 <O\ Z '. S`p1PM Y,yps1 , `�\• o> > s 3y8'\ \ Nei EX SIGNAGE TO BE = �-1 gym\ To BE RELOCATED 800 lrStl\i:l AIL- 331411y o S a �R' � 0 „+ � AA• ROti I v PROPOSED SIGNAL .QW o y ® s N • 1V• ps11 o i� cn� CONNECT TO EXISTING R" 7s6 10" s _ r 1\5 20� s. '�\ \♦ r P' 6 o �kd ". pgRpONDP 1� i 720 v W 65 - .� St IRA \ w .. ps12 . r �l (y ps1395 \ ----R \p WSMt BUILDING SUMMARY Vo 30" LANDS P s 7 .^ 9 2 P 10 g No � Summar I of Areas PLAN TYPE # OF BLDGS. # OF UNITS X OF TOTAL SINGLE FAMILY S.F 6 DETACHED 60X70 30 5,127 CLUSTER UNITS 5,295 31 PLAN 1 24 24 511 PLAN 2 23 23 491 SUBTOTAL 47 1009 SINGLE FAMILY 5,140 34 CONDOMINIUMS 11 4,857 CLUSTER UNITS 4,235 12 PLAN 1 18 18 251 PLAN 2 26 16 351 .PLAN 3 29 29 401 SUBTOTAL 73 1001 MULTI -FAMILY UNITS 39 4,462 4-PLEX 2 8 40 6-PLEX 9 54 4,682 SUBTOTAL 61 18 OTAL # OF UNITS 182 4,924 1. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 8714-002-900, 8714-002-901, 8714-002-902, 8714-002-903 AND 8714-015-901. 2 EXISTING & PROPOSED ZONING: SITE D SPECIFIC PLAN 3. EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT 4, PROPOSED LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL 5. EXISTING & PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN: SPECIFIC PLAN, SITE D. 6. ALL STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND GRADING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DIAMOND BAR STANDARDS, ORDINANCES AND APPROVED MODIFICATIONS HERETO. 7. ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD SHALL BE ACCOMMODATED ON THE FINAL DESIGN, OR THEY SHALL BE EITHER QUITCLAIMED, ABANDONED OR RELOCATED TO THE SATISFACTION OF ALL INTERESTED PARTIES. DRAINAGE AND PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS NECESSARY TO SERVE THIS PROJECT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AND WITH THE UTILITY PURVEYORS. EXISTING STORM DRAIN EASEMENTS WILL BE ABANDONED DURING THE FINAL MAP PROCEDURES. & MULTI FAMILY BUILDING TO MEET NFPA 13 STANDARDS. 9. ESTIMATED EARTHWORK QUANTITIES: 415,500 CYS. CUT, 415,500 CYS. FILL. 10. SEWER SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT. 11. PER LA COUNTY FIRM PANEL 1880 OF 2350. 12. PRIVATE WATER QUALITY BAI TO BE MAINTAINED BY H.O.A. 13. LOTS 62 & 63 ARE TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR & MAINTAINED BY THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. 14. ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG DIAMOND BAR BLVD, BREA CANYON RD AND % 680 1' I 1 I - -- -. �3 A • ` • \ , \ PASADO ON. TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. "} - o ao 86 120 Iso zoo zao zao szo sso aoo aao aao szo 560 soo 640 sao 72o Iso aoo aao aeo azo TOTAL GROSS 247,342 S.F. _ $96 \ Ps - " "� - sl ' '� 2' ps1 .+ \\ \ ` - -- EX SIGNAGE TO BE -o '•' N P \ E 5.7 A0. 15 ALL TRASH IS INDIVIDUAL PICK UP BY WASTE MANAGEMENT. TRASH PICK UP .FOR / .Q h o ^ 5-(R <cy \ \ ✓ \ wP 5 AVERAGE GROSS 5,263 S.F.' 6' _ 1 i0 BE RELOCATED ry m o o \/ _ 0 Bm"0 \ \ q00 \ o j6 MSE LOTS 2 THROUGH 5 NEEDS i0 BE LOCATED ON "B" STREET. TRASH PICK UP FOR ,/ `"' a, o m - ` p§. _ �• .� s1 9 s1 \ \ l ps1 LOT i WILL BE ALONG THE LOOP ALLEY. 6" a i.6" Y ) _ r r RIGHT -OF WAY TO 'i p /`^ • P - CF.IPER /PLA N 6" 12" 12" J TO l vlr!'T Jva -T6r�r%I ���fJJ / OW BE DEDICATED i E - \ \ \ `° ""� p p p4 \ \ CITY OF DI D BAR � • 60 � ps1 \ 1 W5' LOTS 1-5 TO BE MAPPED FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES. - o e ,� \ c 1 ,,, 165 ✓� m � \ � \ P ps1 \\ � r \ R-3' PER PLAN / o / EX, 12" ACP WATER �5 1h"�•;. • Ps1 o a �, s� 0 w - \ �; 1 65 ` \• ` pW 17 STORM DRAIN SYSTEM TO BE PRIVATE. AO y UT/L/TY AGENC/E o / e / R _, - , 26 1°1p1°6 a9% \ P L9 Ot \\ •\�♦ Ps1 °' \� g• BN•nP SCHOOL DISTRICT: POSTAL SERVICE: R=1/2" R=1/2" FL R= 112* / l � _ En BE TO BE \ �/ OW ` - ' 0 'I WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WALNUT VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT USPS _. EXISTING TREES 70 BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED PER TREE SURVEY. el • '' ^ PROPOSED MEDIA / - / P \ �. s 16p • \ ���. ,. \ ps1 P \ \ ,. \ 1 271 S. BREA CANYON ROAD 880 SOUTH LEMON AVE. 1317 SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BLVD. - = ,' 413.P. w \ 1g15 • \• 0' 5 w4[ \ \ \\ WALNUT, CA 91789 WALNUT, CA 91789 DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 • :' __�� P09 POLE ? h i '� 2 / ( ) ( ) " Ex o , t . 1` - P° 9• \ 909 595-7554 eoD 275-6777 LOT SUMMARY �o .. TO BE RELO .. 10p �QI ♦ 14$ \ \ ♦ •. 6 PROPOSED SIGNAL l MoOlFica TION AT / PPROPosED R Rw -_ y , o o �//�'- . `�s q6\\ 1 ,, \797 A�o. wP♦s1 \ cs I i\ /\ ��� 60 N� N� 6r5 \ •\ \ Y 2 5P \\ I1fDEpWONE SERVICE: TRASH: SINGLE FAMILY HOMES) SEWER SERVICE: TRUNK LINES Lot No. Land Use LdB ACtBB 24DIAMOND BAR BLVD. WASTE MANAGEMENT INC. LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT &BREA CANYON RD. 1400 PHILLIPS RANCH RD. 13940 E. LIVE OAK AVE. 1955 WORKMAN MILL ROAD LOT1 MULTI -FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO 62 3.3 ^ L� /y �p GUM - - - - LOTS 2-5 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDOS 73 5.9 4' ROLLED CURB k GUTTER 6 CURB & GUI ,C^ ` s _--- / m m W / e p •`\ \1 pot 53 / 11 \ N y 1� A (O )NA, - 91766 (800) 266-7551 (562) 699-7411 _ Ex. R w � ° � \\ BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 WHITTIER, CA 90507 ED 47 NTS NTS � _ \+� \\ '�t" o 2 . \ 0 1 g \\ 800 483-5000 - _" -EX CCURB _ .3' rt 121\\ „ 8 FK \ ` ` 5 \ \ P �• LOTS 6-52 SINGLE FAMILY DETACH 5 7 --- /` ,150 - \ I \ \ 118• `' 1'R' :.. p,1 3 " ELECTRIC SERVICE: (EOR REFERENCE ONLY) (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) EX. POWER POLE '� - - / --- " P \` s \y c�R� ' �' ^' �\ Ps 0 \' 1 ae 60 \ TRASH: (FOR MULTI -FAMILY) SEWER SERVICE: (MAIN LINES) LOT 53-57 SLOPES/OPEN SPACE 5.7 70 BE RELOCATED -� ^- "'-- - i `\ `\ 1\ ?\� P q % �-( 154 °>\ o\ \ o, ♦ 5 ps1 9• / -\ \ SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. VALLEY VISTA INC. LOS ANGELES COUNTY OF PUBLIC WORKS - --� -' rR \ • q � % RE��. � ps1 w se I � 5'<y'L 800 CIENEGA AVE, 13940E LIVE OAK AVE. SEWER MAINTENANCE DISTRICT LOT 58 PRIVATE STREETS 4.0 SAN DIMAS, CA V91773 1 BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 900 FREEMONT LOT // o $0 683 BE _^ ip' Z° \ �'ro P (800) 655-4555 00) 266-7551 ALHAMB A - 1 3�8 RIGHY-OF-WAVY 680 \- ps V1 �' �\ ". 1b0 ri LOT 62 6 RAIN AGARDEN PARK/BASIN 1 0�� / (8 RA C 01 p 4 1 �FMP-4o oRM DRAIN , \\ \ ps1 11 V-6 0 31 1 a o 1 0%` Rar r GAS SERVICE: 3' BE DEDICATED r THE / I 6 V - _�! 1 CABLE N: p p / µ1EDTA FILTER LOW FLOW , _ P 11 w. 1 w 11 ' \ 1 3 _ ✓ / 3' BROW IiY OF DI MOND BAR a / NREATMEN B P � 2/ SISION 10 s1�1 ' �<`'' Ps ` , " • ` 6� 1 Psj6 o m L r' ON H. TYP SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. TIME WARNER LOT 63 PARK 0.9 GARAGE __, - � P \� �- - \ � � I I `A`•- _ / 1919 S. STATE COLLEGE BLVD. 0, DOOR / r _ \ CTURE m .. 6 \ I o \ c / rr ryq, rr 1041 E ROUTE 66 RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATED TO 0.5 / \ \ \ - pyc� \ l X106 a - s is (800) 427-220006 �I 1 \v 1 S �c r� GLENDORA, CA 91740 TOTAL THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 182 29.9 �. 2% MIN 25 �-'----- :. ;t bc ,. _. \ l \. ,_. Q � 4 • s1 3 r� r' i�� s oti+ I \\ p rr BENCH MARK - a /. 4' 1'L 1140± _ P' •F'a, I f _ I 1 rr � '<�%`• / ' oA $ - - o <t ; � ; � '. 1 "' ` ps1 Ps ` m qc -' . I I I .5 /,? ,,,,0 2 I. r. LOS ANGELES COUNTY BENCHMARK NO. G 5073 ELEVATION: 726.809 DATUM: NAVD 88, Ex. CAL BUILDINGS 2005 ADJUSTMENT / 135 _ I I o \ ' ` 1 - i 3' TOE ) P/ SCALE. 1 "=50, D EX R W /i r • - ,. r, 740 - I / 00/ �. / ✓ ! ^ 'La r DESCRIPTION: EX POWER POLE / / yC�OP 0\N /,- / / . - '- / b F ..Et• � 1 � 2 s :� ps `n ' 'yo i r DITCH, TYP • TY /NGS �i` R, ' �. z9 R o 0' CURB DETAIL AND UTILITIES PR POgED CURB F �/ p _r� Q ? J y' �l LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TAG IN EAST CURB OF DIAMOND KITS TO BE RELOCATED / / -� / ;n p0 ' ��� / / ,' / � " l - I � - /� %f' G \ -- / , r; ;� _ SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDO MULTI FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO BAR BLVD. 42.7 FEET EAST OF CENTERLINE AND 95 FEET NORTH OF CENTERLINE OF PROPOSED R/W / 10 sl .: ' g0E`'� i g •O ° r (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) / / /. / h /. , > P _ _--. /.., Ps o. \ b r ,% 110.2 - 111.0 CROOKED CREEK DRIVE. / �. / _ > 12 ? PEDESTRIAN l l / � / ^ Of o1 / 0 � � ° a � , m''z 1 1 ,38 (SSWALK / ep � / / � ' r 29. g5, \ -. � � Xr 107.7 41.5' 28.0' 41.5' CURB n / �p / "� / �A' / W >22 , s / \ O / A' i _;G'. X10 �'' A� �l`\\* q', 1 N'k r.r / - , \ cuRo LEGAL DESCRIPTION ( / A 10.0' W 26' r' ' \ - /5, >o - 9' 6 AQV_. r -c _ , ' r/ v r, 32' BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 9 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO / / / ,r e a :! 2 CP 5 / / r '' - �'ss,1b'51. // , / / 90 ` , Try'v� � rrr MIN. MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, GOUTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Ypr� o\S,gA•r ^.� 5- A1�' ',%'rY�• r % ,,:.1psI/ r-> B � �/4 �/ gp,0A7b =,� vv v vL.. .�P3', , 4' r / r' .r 5.5' 317" o w I 5.5 94.5' 2 D 7 DEVELOPMENT S TANDARDS L 38.8' BROW ARK PER SITE D SPECIFIC PLAN 5 / - e 14 7.5' 75' GFRE TRUCK s / 5.5' 4 134.5' DEVELOPMENT STANDARD/LOWMEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL REQUIRED PROVIDEDTURNING RADIUS DETAIL 4 XISTING NDERGROUND 10.0' MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS 200 182 Al MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE 60% 41.9% TYPICAL �- z°• 0 , . I ro 5.5' - \I - - /> 1 , ',_-- - MINIMUM YARD SETBACKS: FRONT YARD 10 FEET 10 FEET tAr REAR YARD 15 FEET 88 FEET*OFF-STREET PARK/NG QNTS p ,v ' 0/ 75. SIDE YARD INTERIOR 10 FEET ONE 10 FEET * SIDE 5 OTHER CURB 12,2' SIDE YARD STREET 10 FEET STREET 10 FEET 5 / SIDE 5 ON OTHER 5 FEET wNEEL9'- SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED (60X70) r LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS 15% 6. 3' To STOP \� // ^^m°/ \ g0 / /' ,' ,3 00' ` / �� r OITCw TYP PRIVATE LANDSCAPED AREAS 15% OS r i 1.. - 16° r'' / s. Tr'7r1Cr l2 )r/-Jrr- / // /(w /�', VQ0�- `70 �•' ;`/ j � /� , SS II I II II1 ?.ts�. m -% �^o\ I _ � �_ �„ o /41 /_ ry ^^ti. • `r \O. ^` or r 3r \ P16 010- X8680. 0�' 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK � COMMON LANDSCAPED AREAS 4'4% 18.8' TOTAL LANDSCAPED AREAS 59% .os >r.r A10 jr160 PARKING SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED ExsnNc RESIDENT PARKING 94 2 ENCLOSED 94 ESM7 5.0' -4 I 0'5.0' 700 SPACES PER UNT) 5.0GUEST PARKING 32 (1 SPACE PER 3 185 5.REQUIRED RESIDENT SPACES) ROW PARKING SINGLE FAMILY TYPICAL STREET SECT/ONS , RE 11. 2' 19.Q' CONDO/MULTI-FAMILY. DITCH, TYR 70.0' 19.8' RESIDENT PARKING 270 1 ENCLOSED SPACE PER 270 r SERVICE RO/D AND A _> 9 - O rr r� CT No, 2{JF�{� PEDESTRIA)V ACCESS ONLY - 1 BEDROOM UNIT, 2 ENCLOSED ' l EMERGENCY INGRE55/CGRE55 _ SPACES PER UNITS WITH 2 w ggqq OR MORE BEDROOMS) � <; / � � � j � � 'rl TCH, TYP Fe 0`)" E �`L /U/ GUEST PARKING 90 (1 SPACE PER 3 "11 19 3' TOE DITCH, TYP ��� \-@" `� r s REQUIRED RESIDENT SPACES) y . w ` 'k �. A �� b� til` fz' EASEM Nr AJ --- -. - I \ 1. ? / 8' EASEMENT 2' 15.0' 2' TOTAL PARKING TVP/CAL ON STREET \ I \ / y iq, 1q•p• p• OS' EASEMENT D.5• 2' 12. e' 2' RESIDENT PARKING. 364 364 PARALLEL PARK/NG / ^a-. m` / os' os' 0.5 _ 0.5' NTS. GUEST PARKING. 122 296 � 3d' LANDSCAPE SETBACK v Pv �� / EMERGENCY 90 \ \ I ' ,`' 2'1 OP 7/ ,2 111 2 1 2111 CURB INGRESS/EGRESS ` \ / i6o % / / \ pK z, 4,pi z, » DEVIATION TO SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SETBACKS REQUIRED 1�1 fd' / \ Z` 0 �4.Y SWALE SWALE Z.1 1 'Na"Y E ¢ NORTHERLY CL SOUTHERLY \ `s' �y \\ AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM) R/w BERM ° R/W R/W R/W R/W 46' R/W R RIGHT-OF-WAY TO SECTION A -A ENTRY - PORTION OF "A" STREET (PRIVATE) SECTION B -B ENTRY - PORTION OF "A" STREET (PRIVATE) 50' 50' 8' 42' 4' 35' 8' i M DI IN I 3• 2,07 2.0% 6' CURB & GUTTER CURB 6" CURB & GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK SECTION L -L EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) WALL 54R/W 54' I BTDEDICATEDPFND BAR _ ' �� ,'- / SECTION 1-1 SECTION J -J SECTION K -K 23.0' 23.0' _ 27'0' 27'0' 27'0' 27'01 I/ o. k EMERGENCY ACCESS ROAD SERVICE ACCESS ROAD PEDESTRIAWSERWaACGESS ROAD 36'LOT 55 I 14.0' 26' 14.0' I ---�-- I / ' S' _ (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) IfA' 1A' S'I A. /r\\ '4- 10 IS 1 IS I IU 4 2' - 8' -- Br - 2' ♦- ,.", i /. PKWY PKWY Y 22 .,y 2� l��RKI p0 "55 SIDEWALK SIDEW QP v\ a• 32'31.75'SIDEWALK SIDEWALK 5 , I, J w wCURB & CURB & CURB �� ¢ GUTTER GUTTER t1 TETE" FL u FL FL cQi FL GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER 4' 28' 4' 3' 28' 19' 2.875' 26' 2.875' SECTION C -C SECTION D -D NOR STREET LOCA( STREET MIN. TRAVEL MIN. MIN. TRAVEL PARKING MIN. TRAVEL MIN. 'A' STREET - LOCAL STREET 'A' STREET • LOCAL STREET (TAPER) PARKING BOTH SIDES \, �$ ~D$ \ 1 PARKING BOTH SIDES NO PARKING (PRIVATE) 4" RourD D" cuee d" ROLLED 4" ROLLED 0' CURB CURB CURB 6"CURB CURB (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) r. ..� \ SECTION F -F SECTION G -G SECTION H -H 4 r � PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS R/W R/w 2' 11 I 50'54' I 42' 8' 4' 42' I 8.1 1 S MI I 1 2 ~ I oz z1 I cu K e R 6" CURB & GI/TIER' 8' SIDEWALK \-6" CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED 8" SIDEWALK -8" FOE ALK SECTION L -L PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) 50' 150' 35' 4' 45' M DIA I Mon m- 3 CURB -6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER - SECTION )I EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD (PUBLIC) r�PROPOSED w R/W RWROl4Yfd7S RW iib' I 5o' 60, 8' 1 1 8' 35' 4' 63 �1 3' M DIA, 1 _ _ MP% 201 2.0% 2'1 nmm CUR6 L PROPOSED 6" CURB & GUTTER RETAINING WALL 6 CURB & CUTTER 8' SIDEWALK 5' SIDEWALK SECTION M -M PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) 14" 35' MEgIAN 1/ 6" CDR:; URB fi CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 3' SIDEWALK SECTION N -N EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) PROPOSED RIPROYFIIENIS If►1 r�PROPOSED MPROWWMT9 R�106' R/W 50' 1 11 56' 156' 1 f 8' 42' 4' 1 41' 1 B'l 3' I MDII 3• LN I I Z.1 an1 2. 09, I I PROPOS! CURB L RETAININ 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER B' SIDEWALK PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK SECTION N -N PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD (PUBLIC) PRIVATE STREET PRNATF STREET TYPICAL PRIVATE DRIVE (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) AND FIRE LANE (PRIVATE) F � PROPOSED IMPROVEMEMS PEW 8 •. R/W T y 92' RI✓ 40' 40' 40' 1 52' 8' 32' 32' 8' 1 1 1 20% 201 20% mwww _ m_ WALL L 6" CURB & GDM°R 6' CURB & GU FR 6- CURB & GUTTER i 8 SIDEWALK '-EXISNNG'8" SIDEWALK 6" CURB &GUTTER SECTION 0-0 SECTION 0-0 EXISTING BREA CANYON ROAD PROPOSED BREA GANYON ROAD (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) DENSITY SUMMARY Summar I of Areas CONDO Lot No. S.F Lot No. S.F 6 7,867 30 5,127 7 5,295 31 6,674 8 4,945 32 6,329 9 4,928 33 5,346 10 5,140 34 4,408 11 4,857 35 4,235 12 4,761 36 4,227 13 7,033 37 4,230 14 4,902 38 4,232 15 4,646 39 4,462 16 4,328 40 4,652 17 4,682 41 4,715 18 7,473 42 4,924 19 6,095 43 5,159 20 5,022 44 5,347 21 5,214 45 5,297 22 5,731 46 5,683 23 5,419 47 4,169 24 7,196 48 4,808 25 4,577 49 5,911 26 5 214 50 5466 27 15 631 51 4645 28 6,414 Si 5,160 29 1 4,763 1. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 8714-002-900, 8714-002-901, 8714-002-902, 8714-002-903 AND 8714-015-901. 2 EXISTING & PROPOSED ZONING: SITE D SPECIFIC PLAN 3. EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT 4, PROPOSED LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL 5. EXISTING & PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN: SPECIFIC PLAN, SITE D. 6. ALL STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND GRADING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DIAMOND BAR STANDARDS, ORDINANCES AND APPROVED MODIFICATIONS HERETO. 7. ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD SHALL BE ACCOMMODATED ON THE FINAL DESIGN, OR THEY SHALL BE EITHER QUITCLAIMED, ABANDONED OR RELOCATED TO THE SATISFACTION OF ALL INTERESTED PARTIES. DRAINAGE AND PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS NECESSARY TO SERVE THIS PROJECT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AND WITH THE UTILITY PURVEYORS. EXISTING STORM DRAIN EASEMENTS WILL BE ABANDONED DURING THE FINAL MAP PROCEDURES. & MULTI FAMILY BUILDING TO MEET NFPA 13 STANDARDS. 9. ESTIMATED EARTHWORK QUANTITIES: 415,500 CYS. CUT, 415,500 CYS. FILL. 10. SEWER SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT. 11. PER LA COUNTY FIRM PANEL 1880 OF 2350. 12. PRIVATE WATER QUALITY BAI TO BE MAINTAINED BY H.O.A. 13. LOTS 62 & 63 ARE TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR & MAINTAINED BY THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. 14. ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG DIAMOND BAR BLVD, BREA CANYON RD AND % 680 1' I 1 I - -- -. �3 A • ` • \ , \ PASADO ON. TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. "} - o ao 86 120 Iso zoo zao zao szo sso aoo aao aao szo 560 soo 640 sao 72o Iso aoo aao aeo azo TOTAL GROSS 247,342 S.F. _ $96 \ Ps - " "� - sl ' '� 2' ps1 .+ \\ \ ` - -- EX SIGNAGE TO BE -o '•' N P \ E 5.7 A0. 15 ALL TRASH IS INDIVIDUAL PICK UP BY WASTE MANAGEMENT. TRASH PICK UP .FOR / .Q h o ^ 5-(R <cy \ \ ✓ \ wP 5 AVERAGE GROSS 5,263 S.F.' 6' _ 1 i0 BE RELOCATED ry m o o \/ _ 0 Bm"0 \ \ q00 \ o j6 MSE LOTS 2 THROUGH 5 NEEDS i0 BE LOCATED ON "B" STREET. TRASH PICK UP FOR ,/ `"' a, o m - ` p§. _ �• .� s1 9 s1 \ \ l ps1 LOT i WILL BE ALONG THE LOOP ALLEY. 6" a i.6" Y ) _ r r RIGHT -OF WAY TO 'i p /`^ • P - CF.IPER /PLA N 6" 12" 12" J TO l vlr!'T Jva -T6r�r%I ���fJJ / OW BE DEDICATED i E - \ \ \ `° ""� p p p4 \ \ CITY OF DI D BAR � • 60 � ps1 \ 1 W5' LOTS 1-5 TO BE MAPPED FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES. - o e ,� \ c 1 ,,, 165 ✓� m � \ � \ P ps1 \\ � r \ R-3' PER PLAN / o / EX, 12" ACP WATER �5 1h"�•;. • Ps1 o a �, s� 0 w - \ �; 1 65 ` \• ` pW 17 STORM DRAIN SYSTEM TO BE PRIVATE. AO y UT/L/TY AGENC/E o / e / R _, - , 26 1°1p1°6 a9% \ P L9 Ot \\ •\�♦ Ps1 °' \� g• BN•nP SCHOOL DISTRICT: POSTAL SERVICE: R=1/2" R=1/2" FL R= 112* / l � _ En BE TO BE \ �/ OW ` - ' 0 'I WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WALNUT VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT USPS _. EXISTING TREES 70 BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED PER TREE SURVEY. el • '' ^ PROPOSED MEDIA / - / P \ �. s 16p • \ ���. ,. \ ps1 P \ \ ,. \ 1 271 S. BREA CANYON ROAD 880 SOUTH LEMON AVE. 1317 SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BLVD. - = ,' 413.P. w \ 1g15 • \• 0' 5 w4[ \ \ \\ WALNUT, CA 91789 WALNUT, CA 91789 DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 • :' __�� P09 POLE ? h i '� 2 / ( ) ( ) " Ex o , t . 1` - P° 9• \ 909 595-7554 eoD 275-6777 LOT SUMMARY �o .. TO BE RELO .. 10p �QI ♦ 14$ \ \ ♦ •. 6 PROPOSED SIGNAL l MoOlFica TION AT / PPROPosED R Rw -_ y , o o �//�'- . `�s q6\\ 1 ,, \797 A�o. wP♦s1 \ cs I i\ /\ ��� 60 N� N� 6r5 \ •\ \ Y 2 5P \\ I1fDEpWONE SERVICE: TRASH: SINGLE FAMILY HOMES) SEWER SERVICE: TRUNK LINES Lot No. Land Use LdB ACtBB 24DIAMOND BAR BLVD. WASTE MANAGEMENT INC. LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT &BREA CANYON RD. 1400 PHILLIPS RANCH RD. 13940 E. LIVE OAK AVE. 1955 WORKMAN MILL ROAD LOT1 MULTI -FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO 62 3.3 ^ L� /y �p GUM - - - - LOTS 2-5 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDOS 73 5.9 4' ROLLED CURB k GUTTER 6 CURB & GUI ,C^ ` s _--- / m m W / e p •`\ \1 pot 53 / 11 \ N y 1� A (O )NA, - 91766 (800) 266-7551 (562) 699-7411 _ Ex. R w � ° � \\ BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 WHITTIER, CA 90507 ED 47 NTS NTS � _ \+� \\ '�t" o 2 . \ 0 1 g \\ 800 483-5000 - _" -EX CCURB _ .3' rt 121\\ „ 8 FK \ ` ` 5 \ \ P �• LOTS 6-52 SINGLE FAMILY DETACH 5 7 --- /` ,150 - \ I \ \ 118• `' 1'R' :.. p,1 3 " ELECTRIC SERVICE: (EOR REFERENCE ONLY) (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) EX. POWER POLE '� - - / --- " P \` s \y c�R� ' �' ^' �\ Ps 0 \' 1 ae 60 \ TRASH: (FOR MULTI -FAMILY) SEWER SERVICE: (MAIN LINES) LOT 53-57 SLOPES/OPEN SPACE 5.7 70 BE RELOCATED -� ^- "'-- - i `\ `\ 1\ ?\� P q % �-( 154 °>\ o\ \ o, ♦ 5 ps1 9• / -\ \ SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. VALLEY VISTA INC. LOS ANGELES COUNTY OF PUBLIC WORKS - --� -' rR \ • q � % RE��. � ps1 w se I � 5'<y'L 800 CIENEGA AVE, 13940E LIVE OAK AVE. SEWER MAINTENANCE DISTRICT LOT 58 PRIVATE STREETS 4.0 SAN DIMAS, CA V91773 1 BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 900 FREEMONT LOT // o $0 683 BE _^ ip' Z° \ �'ro P (800) 655-4555 00) 266-7551 ALHAMB A - 1 3�8 RIGHY-OF-WAVY 680 \- ps V1 �' �\ ". 1b0 ri LOT 62 6 RAIN AGARDEN PARK/BASIN 1 0�� / (8 RA C 01 p 4 1 �FMP-4o oRM DRAIN , \\ \ ps1 11 V-6 0 31 1 a o 1 0%` Rar r GAS SERVICE: 3' BE DEDICATED r THE / I 6 V - _�! 1 CABLE N: p p / µ1EDTA FILTER LOW FLOW , _ P 11 w. 1 w 11 ' \ 1 3 _ ✓ / 3' BROW IiY OF DI MOND BAR a / NREATMEN B P � 2/ SISION 10 s1�1 ' �<`'' Ps ` , " • ` 6� 1 Psj6 o m L r' ON H. TYP SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. TIME WARNER LOT 63 PARK 0.9 GARAGE __, - � P \� �- - \ � � I I `A`•- _ / 1919 S. STATE COLLEGE BLVD. 0, DOOR / r _ \ CTURE m .. 6 \ I o \ c / rr ryq, rr 1041 E ROUTE 66 RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATED TO 0.5 / \ \ \ - pyc� \ l X106 a - s is (800) 427-220006 �I 1 \v 1 S �c r� GLENDORA, CA 91740 TOTAL THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 182 29.9 �. 2% MIN 25 �-'----- :. ;t bc ,. _. \ l \. ,_. Q � 4 • s1 3 r� r' i�� s oti+ I \\ p rr BENCH MARK - a /. 4' 1'L 1140± _ P' •F'a, I f _ I 1 rr � '<�%`• / ' oA $ - - o <t ; � ; � '. 1 "' ` ps1 Ps ` m qc -' . I I I .5 /,? ,,,,0 2 I. r. LOS ANGELES COUNTY BENCHMARK NO. G 5073 ELEVATION: 726.809 DATUM: NAVD 88, Ex. CAL BUILDINGS 2005 ADJUSTMENT / 135 _ I I o \ ' ` 1 - i 3' TOE ) P/ SCALE. 1 "=50, D EX R W /i r • - ,. r, 740 - I / 00/ �. / ✓ ! ^ 'La r DESCRIPTION: EX POWER POLE / / yC�OP 0\N /,- / / . - '- / b F ..Et• � 1 � 2 s :� ps `n ' 'yo i r DITCH, TYP • TY /NGS �i` R, ' �. z9 R o 0' CURB DETAIL AND UTILITIES PR POgED CURB F �/ p _r� Q ? J y' �l LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TAG IN EAST CURB OF DIAMOND KITS TO BE RELOCATED / / -� / ;n p0 ' ��� / / ,' / � " l - I � - /� %f' G \ -- / , r; ;� _ SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDO MULTI FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO BAR BLVD. 42.7 FEET EAST OF CENTERLINE AND 95 FEET NORTH OF CENTERLINE OF PROPOSED R/W / 10 sl .: ' g0E`'� i g •O ° r (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) / / /. / h /. , > P _ _--. /.., Ps o. \ b r ,% 110.2 - 111.0 CROOKED CREEK DRIVE. / �. / _ > 12 ? PEDESTRIAN l l / � / ^ Of o1 / 0 � � ° a � , m''z 1 1 ,38 (SSWALK / ep � / / � ' r 29. g5, \ -. � � Xr 107.7 41.5' 28.0' 41.5' CURB n / �p / "� / �A' / W >22 , s / \ O / A' i _;G'. X10 �'' A� �l`\\* q', 1 N'k r.r / - , \ cuRo LEGAL DESCRIPTION ( / A 10.0' W 26' r' ' \ - /5, >o - 9' 6 AQV_. r -c _ , ' r/ v r, 32' BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 9 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO / / / ,r e a :! 2 CP 5 / / r '' - �'ss,1b'51. // , / / 90 ` , Try'v� � rrr MIN. MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, GOUTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Ypr� o\S,gA•r ^.� 5- A1�' ',%'rY�• r % ,,:.1psI/ r-> B � �/4 �/ gp,0A7b =,� vv v vL.. .�P3', , 4' r / r' .r 5.5' 317" o w I 5.5 94.5' 2 D 7 DEVELOPMENT S TANDARDS L 38.8' BROW ARK PER SITE D SPECIFIC PLAN 5 / - e 14 7.5' 75' GFRE TRUCK s / 5.5' 4 134.5' DEVELOPMENT STANDARD/LOWMEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL REQUIRED PROVIDEDTURNING RADIUS DETAIL 4 XISTING NDERGROUND 10.0' MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS 200 182 Al MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE 60% 41.9% TYPICAL �- z°• 0 , . I ro 5.5' - \I - - /> 1 , ',_-- - MINIMUM YARD SETBACKS: FRONT YARD 10 FEET 10 FEET tAr REAR YARD 15 FEET 88 FEET*OFF-STREET PARK/NG QNTS p ,v ' 0/ 75. SIDE YARD INTERIOR 10 FEET ONE 10 FEET * SIDE 5 OTHER CURB 12,2' SIDE YARD STREET 10 FEET STREET 10 FEET 5 / SIDE 5 ON OTHER 5 FEET wNEEL9'- SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED (60X70) r LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS 15% 6. 3' To STOP \� // ^^m°/ \ g0 / /' ,' ,3 00' ` / �� r OITCw TYP PRIVATE LANDSCAPED AREAS 15% OS r i 1.. - 16° r'' / s. Tr'7r1Cr l2 )r/-Jrr- / // /(w /�', VQ0�- `70 �•' ;`/ j � /� , SS II I II II1 ?.ts�. m -% �^o\ I _ � �_ �„ o /41 /_ ry ^^ti. • `r \O. ^` or r 3r \ P16 010- X8680. 0�' 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK � COMMON LANDSCAPED AREAS 4'4% 18.8' TOTAL LANDSCAPED AREAS 59% .os >r.r A10 jr160 PARKING SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED ExsnNc RESIDENT PARKING 94 2 ENCLOSED 94 ESM7 5.0' -4 I 0'5.0' 700 SPACES PER UNT) 5.0GUEST PARKING 32 (1 SPACE PER 3 185 5.REQUIRED RESIDENT SPACES) ROW PARKING SINGLE FAMILY TYPICAL STREET SECT/ONS , RE 11. 2' 19.Q' CONDO/MULTI-FAMILY. DITCH, TYR 70.0' 19.8' RESIDENT PARKING 270 1 ENCLOSED SPACE PER 270 r SERVICE RO/D AND A _> 9 - O rr r� CT No, 2{JF�{� PEDESTRIA)V ACCESS ONLY - 1 BEDROOM UNIT, 2 ENCLOSED ' l EMERGENCY INGRE55/CGRE55 _ SPACES PER UNITS WITH 2 w ggqq OR MORE BEDROOMS) � <; / � � � j � � 'rl TCH, TYP Fe 0`)" E �`L /U/ GUEST PARKING 90 (1 SPACE PER 3 "11 19 3' TOE DITCH, TYP ��� \-@" `� r s REQUIRED RESIDENT SPACES) y . w ` 'k �. A �� b� til` fz' EASEM Nr AJ --- -. - I \ 1. ? / 8' EASEMENT 2' 15.0' 2' TOTAL PARKING TVP/CAL ON STREET \ I \ / y iq, 1q•p• p• OS' EASEMENT D.5• 2' 12. e' 2' RESIDENT PARKING. 364 364 PARALLEL PARK/NG / ^a-. m` / os' os' 0.5 _ 0.5' NTS. GUEST PARKING. 122 296 � 3d' LANDSCAPE SETBACK v Pv �� / EMERGENCY 90 \ \ I ' ,`' 2'1 OP 7/ ,2 111 2 1 2111 CURB INGRESS/EGRESS ` \ / i6o % / / \ pK z, 4,pi z, » DEVIATION TO SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SETBACKS REQUIRED 1�1 fd' / \ Z` 0 �4.Y SWALE SWALE Z.1 1 'Na"Y E ¢ NORTHERLY CL SOUTHERLY \ `s' �y \\ AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM) R/w BERM ° R/W R/W R/W R/W 46' R/W R RIGHT-OF-WAY TO SECTION A -A ENTRY - PORTION OF "A" STREET (PRIVATE) SECTION B -B ENTRY - PORTION OF "A" STREET (PRIVATE) 50' 50' 8' 42' 4' 35' 8' i M DI IN I 3• 2,07 2.0% 6' CURB & GUTTER CURB 6" CURB & GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK SECTION L -L EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) WALL 54R/W 54' I BTDEDICATEDPFND BAR _ ' �� ,'- / SECTION 1-1 SECTION J -J SECTION K -K 23.0' 23.0' _ 27'0' 27'0' 27'0' 27'01 I/ o. k EMERGENCY ACCESS ROAD SERVICE ACCESS ROAD PEDESTRIAWSERWaACGESS ROAD 36'LOT 55 I 14.0' 26' 14.0' I ---�-- I / ' S' _ (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) IfA' 1A' S'I A. /r\\ '4- 10 IS 1 IS I IU 4 2' - 8' -- Br - 2' ♦- ,.", i /. PKWY PKWY Y 22 .,y 2� l��RKI p0 "55 SIDEWALK SIDEW QP v\ a• 32'31.75'SIDEWALK SIDEWALK 5 , I, J w wCURB & CURB & CURB �� ¢ GUTTER GUTTER t1 TETE" FL u FL FL cQi FL GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER 4' 28' 4' 3' 28' 19' 2.875' 26' 2.875' SECTION C -C SECTION D -D NOR STREET LOCA( STREET MIN. TRAVEL MIN. MIN. TRAVEL PARKING MIN. TRAVEL MIN. 'A' STREET - LOCAL STREET 'A' STREET • LOCAL STREET (TAPER) PARKING BOTH SIDES \, �$ ~D$ \ 1 PARKING BOTH SIDES NO PARKING (PRIVATE) 4" RourD D" cuee d" ROLLED 4" ROLLED 0' CURB CURB CURB 6"CURB CURB (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) r. ..� \ SECTION F -F SECTION G -G SECTION H -H 4 r � PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS R/W R/w 2' 11 I 50'54' I 42' 8' 4' 42' I 8.1 1 S MI I 1 2 ~ I oz z1 I cu K e R 6" CURB & GI/TIER' 8' SIDEWALK \-6" CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED 8" SIDEWALK -8" FOE ALK SECTION L -L PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) 50' 150' 35' 4' 45' M DIA I Mon m- 3 CURB -6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER - SECTION )I EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD (PUBLIC) r�PROPOSED w R/W RWROl4Yfd7S RW iib' I 5o' 60, 8' 1 1 8' 35' 4' 63 �1 3' M DIA, 1 _ _ MP% 201 2.0% 2'1 nmm CUR6 L PROPOSED 6" CURB & GUTTER RETAINING WALL 6 CURB & CUTTER 8' SIDEWALK 5' SIDEWALK SECTION M -M PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) 14" 35' MEgIAN 1/ 6" CDR:; URB fi CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 3' SIDEWALK SECTION N -N EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) PROPOSED RIPROYFIIENIS If►1 r�PROPOSED MPROWWMT9 R�106' R/W 50' 1 11 56' 156' 1 f 8' 42' 4' 1 41' 1 B'l 3' I MDII 3• LN I I Z.1 an1 2. 09, I I PROPOS! CURB L RETAININ 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER B' SIDEWALK PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK SECTION N -N PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD (PUBLIC) PRIVATE STREET PRNATF STREET TYPICAL PRIVATE DRIVE (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) AND FIRE LANE (PRIVATE) F � PROPOSED IMPROVEMEMS PEW 8 •. R/W T y 92' RI✓ 40' 40' 40' 1 52' 8' 32' 32' 8' 1 1 1 20% 201 20% mwww _ m_ WALL L 6" CURB & GDM°R 6' CURB & GU FR 6- CURB & GUTTER i 8 SIDEWALK '-EXISNNG'8" SIDEWALK 6" CURB &GUTTER SECTION 0-0 SECTION 0-0 EXISTING BREA CANYON ROAD PROPOSED BREA GANYON ROAD (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) DENSITY SUMMARY NUMBER OF UNITS MULTI -FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO NUMBER AREA OF UNITS DENSITY OF UNITS (ACRES) 57 (DUTACRO 62 3.3 1&8 DENSITY SUMMARY NUMBER OF UNITS SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED (60x70) NUMBER AREA DENSITY OF UNITS (ACRES) (DUiACRO 47 57 82 DENSITY SUMMARY NUMBER OF UNITS SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDO NUMBER AREA GUEST (V3 PER UNIT) DENSITY OF UNITS (ACRES) TOTALS 47 (DU/ACRE) 73 5.9 185 124 PARKING SUMMARY - SINGLE FAMILY NUMBER OF UNITS REQUIRED PROVIDED COVERED (2 PER UNFD GUEST (V3 PER UNIT) COVERED (2 PER UNIT) GUEST' TOTALS 47 94 32 94 185 INCLUDES ON -STREET PARKING AND 2 GUEST SPACES IN DRIVEWAY PARKING SUMMARY - MULTI -FAMILY NUMBER OF UNITS REQUIRED PROVIDED COVERED (2 PER UI GUEST (1/3 PER UNIT) COVERED (Z PER UNIT) GUEST TOTALS 135 270 90 270 105 MAP DATE IDENTIFIER MIC OF APAT CWNCE i THIS IMV 07/30/13 BY: LP Ms or T"s 01 09 19 Z 13 7.2213 FIRE AND PLANNING LP DATE REVISION BY DATE Jufy 22, 2013 FEET W.O. 0 30 60 120 GROSS AREA 29.7 AC. t 0 1/2 1 2 CONTOUR INTERVAL 5' INCHES TOTAL LOTS 63 PREPARED FOR. PREPARED BY - 0 1111111111 Y--0WNER T T LEN NAIR0 'X -A Im 25 ENTERPRISE \ ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656 v11r \i (949) 349-8100 Z Q HUNSAKER 6r. ASSOCIATES a I R V I N E I N C 1 I- ENONE RING - SURVEYING !n Three Hughs IMA CA WfiV FX (999) 5810]59 PH: (949) aflY1I11R SITE PLAN I VEST/NG TENTATIVE TRACT 72295 F:\0718\Planning\CA_Project\SITE PLAN\0718P_SITE PLAN. dwg PROJECT PROF/LES (VERTICAL & HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1"=60') LEGEND VIEW PROFILE #1 VIEW PROFILE #4 PROJECT BOUNDARY LINE NATURAL GROUND DESIGN GROUND 2 PROPOSED GRADING 800- 760- 720- 680- "I 00760720880 840 NUMBER OF UNITS s00 800- -760 760 NING WALL 720 Lot No. 800 - CENTERLINE 7,867 UW PROPOSED WATER 5,127 s PROPOSED SEWER 760 0.122 31 6,674 SD PROPOSED STORM DRAIN 4,945 s' RTR RETAINING WALL/ 720 ' 0.145 9 4,928 0.113 In H �¢ 0.123 10 5,140 0.118 34 4,408 PROPOSED 11 4,857 Pad=7 RETOA 4,235 0.097 .V'Q P OPOT 36 PRO OSED 13 7,033 0.161 37 4,230 0.097 14 PR POSED Hep 4,232 IO PROPOSEDPZOPOSED MSE ALL t 29 30 0.102 ISEWAL LT ZlPa=766.0± 40 4,652 XISTI°L k ml 2 10 EXIS ING G ad=757. PROPOSED ± i1" ST. Pad- 60.0± Pad=76 .0± L a = T P SADO PROPO ED CRA DE 5,022 1 PR POSED SE WA L 49 Lot 4 45 5,297 0.122 clLot d=721 ± 46 5,683 '756 - 5,419 0.124 47 4,169 9 24 7,196 0.165 OI �'p1 4,808 I� 25 4,577 0.105 OPOSE 5,911 0.135 26 5,214 0.12 50 5,466 0.125 27 5,631 0.129 51 4,645 Lots 16.18 6,414 0.147 52 5,160 0.118 29 4,763 Lot 10 10 �` ---- "B" ST. --- ---- ---- -- PR POSED MSE W LL 5. DI OND BAR - - - -' P Pa =727.5 PROP A' SED S Lot 2, -- F -d=72S± Pa --- Pad 708.2± PROPOSE Pad=7715± =707.4 ad=774. -- - ---- - -- ---- - Lot ( Lot 14 O 'N' BL---- BLVD. PROP SED RETAINING WALL "A" S L 1112 t1 P Lot 7 RETAIN NG WA PR L POSED GRADE m m . ----' EXI TING G ADE R S PR SED PR SED , -' mi0i �O I PRO OSED ACCESS AC ESS ACC S Lot CL m ROPOS D MSE ALL ---- ----------- - --------- _ ---- ---- ---- ---- -------- ---- E STING a ARK I XISTING ---- ------ d=7083 Lot 1 Pad- 08"6± Pad=7 .8± Pad= 07.4± REA N RD. I REA CY . liiJ HANNE RAIN RDEN P ISTING GROUN Z - i PARK BASIN L t 1 Lot Loi 1 p -- --- E 840 NUMBER OF UNITS s00 800- -760 760 NING WALL 720 840 NUMBER OF UNITS LOT LINE OSED - - - - EASEMENT LINE NING WALL Acres Lot No. 800 - CENTERLINE 7,867 UW PROPOSED WATER 5,127 s PROPOSED SEWER 760 0.122 31 6,674 SD PROPOSED STORM DRAIN 4,945 s' RTR RETAINING WALL/ 720 ' 0.145 9 4,928 0.113 In H �¢ 0.123 10 5,140 0.118 34 4,408 PROPOSED 11 4,857 Pad=7 RETOA 4,235 0.097 .V'Q P OPOT 36 PRO OSED 13 7,033 0.161 37 4,230 0.097 14 PR POSED Hep 4,232 IO PROPOSEDPZOPOSED MSE ALL t 29 30 0.102 ISEWAL LT ZlPa=766.0± 40 4,652 XISTI°L k ml 2 10 EXIS ING G ad=757. PROPOSED ± i1" ST. Pad- 60.0± Pad=76 .0± L a = T P SADO R. -- ---- 5,022 1 Lot 17 5,347 0.123 Lot 49 Lot 4 45 5,297 0.122 clLot d=721 ± 46 5,683 Pa '756 - 5,419 0.124 47 4,169 9 840 NUMBER OF UNITS LOT LINE OSED - - - - EASEMENT LINE NING WALL Acres Lot No. 800 - CENTERLINE 7,867 UW PROPOSED WATER 5,127 s PROPOSED SEWER 760 0.122 31 6,674 SD PROPOSED STORM DRAIN 4,945 s' RTR RETAINING WALL/ 720 ' 0.145 9 720 RETAINING WALL HEIGHT 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 z TOP OF SLOPE V -DITCH 680 v �. �i�'i " MSE WALL \ 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 660 640 680 720 760 800 840 880 920 960 1000 1040 1080 1 120 1160 1200 1240 1280 1320 1360 1400 1440 1480 1520 1560 1600 / / VIEW PROFILE #2 O SIDEWALK \\ 3 \ PROPOSED 6' / ENHANCED PAVEMENT VICINITY MAP 80 - NATURAL GROUND PROPOSED GRADING 800 \ \ EX. POWER POLE \\ \ \, \ F TO BE RELOCATED NOTES 760- 720- 680 s720680 AREA TO BE DEDICATED TO �^ A Cut THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 1_ 8714-002-903 AND NUM8714-015-001.714 002-9 714-002-9 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 8714-002-900,8 O1 8 02, 760 ✓ / \ \ \ \ \\ / \ \ - - CUT/FILL LINE \\� Ex R/W &�' "'^ / 3. 5H TIP 1-1 FIII 2. EXISTING & PROPOSED ZONING: SITE D SPECIFIC PLAN 1EX CURB \ ,\ 3 PROPOSED CURB ^ ^ N 2'arNL 6 3. EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT 720 \\ - \ \ - ''\ o PROPOSED R/W ^ , FIRE HYDRANT \ \VEXISMNG 8" SEWER �\ +'" ' : �• �. 4. PROPOSED LAND USE. RESIDENTIAL \\ % EX SIGNAG TO BE s c' 6rIt2 I \ - TO BE RELOCATED n a \\ 5. EXISTING & PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN: SPECIFIC PLAN, SITE D. SEWER DRAIN LOW PLOW 680 ^w / " ie' 1�'E5 ` \ DIVERSION STRUCTURE 0 40 80 720 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680 720 760 8O0 840 880 92a 960 1000 1040 1080 1120 T- PCG i\` / 6. ALL STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND GRADING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE EX. 10" ACP WATER / aIV' .Z 26 Y WITH DIAMOND BAR STANDARDS, ORDINANCES AND APPROVED MODIFICATIONS HERETO. VIEW PROFILE #3 n s CONNECT I ON / i, r 930 135 Za / gE5M5 m TFr1CT 1VD. 3.2-074MP-40 MEDIA FILTER i EXISTING 8" SEWER / pR � .1 A0' 9 N 7. ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD SHALL BE ACCOMMODATED ON THE FINAL DESIGN, OR _ Q 25' arwL ` p -\ d big, 87�,. POYS 5J TU' 5 TREATMENT BMP THEY SHALL BE EITHER QUITCLAIMED, ABANDONED OR RELOCATED TO THE - NATURAL GROUND PROPOSED GRADING A 'W/NO 8 °' / \p \ a4o ?A ` PROPOSED MEDIAN 1a. O /V i ^ ^ 1$L' \ t` o SATISFACTION OF ALL INTERESTED PARTIES DRAINAGE AND PUBLIC UTILITY BOO 760 720 680 NUMBER OF UNITS Summary of Areas CONDO NUMBER AREA Lot No. S.F Acres Lot No. S.F Acres 6 7,867 0.181 30 5,127 0.118 7 5,295 0.122 31 6,674 0.153 8 4,945 0.114 32 6,329 0.145 9 4,928 0.113 In 5,346 0.123 10 5,140 0.118 34 4,408 PROPOSED 11 4,857 Pad=7 6.0'CK 4,235 0.097 12 P OPOT 36 4,227 0.097 13 7,033 0.161 37 4,230 0.097 14 PR POSED Hep 4,232 0.097 PROPOSEDPZOPOSED A' ST. 0.107 t 29 30 0.102 ISEWAL 4,328 0.099 40 4,652 0.107 17 2 0.107 EXIS ING G DE 18 7,473 0.172 42 _----_- 0.113 a = - 0.14 43 5,159 -- ---- 5,022 1 44 5,347 0.123 21 5,214 0.12 45 5,297 0.122 clLot 5,731 0.132 46 5,683 Pa '756 - 5,419 0.124 47 4,169 9 24 7,196 0.165 OI �'p1 4,808 I� 25 4,577 0.105 OPOSE 5,911 0.135 26 5,214 0.12 50 5,466 0.125 27 5,631 0.129 51 4,645 Lots 16.18 6,414 0.147 52 5,160 0.118 29 4,763 Lot 10 10 �` ---- "B" ST. --- ---- ---- -- PRO OSED ADE 5. DI OND BAR - - - -' P Pa =727.5 XISTIN ��' -------------------------------- -d=72S± Pa --- Pad 708.2± P =707.4 ---------------- -- - ---- - -- ---- - BL---- BLVD. PROP SED RETAINING WALL L 1112 t1 P Lot 7 RETAIN NG WA PR L POSED GRADE m m ----' EXI TING G ADE AREA TO BE DEDICATED TO �^ A Cut THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 1_ 8714-002-903 AND NUM8714-015-001.714 002-9 714-002-9 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 8714-002-900,8 O1 8 02, 760 ✓ / \ \ \ \ \\ / \ \ - - CUT/FILL LINE \\� Ex R/W &�' "'^ / 3. 5H TIP 1-1 FIII 2. EXISTING & PROPOSED ZONING: SITE D SPECIFIC PLAN 1EX CURB \ ,\ 3 PROPOSED CURB ^ ^ N 2'arNL 6 3. EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT 720 \\ - \ \ - ''\ o PROPOSED R/W ^ , FIRE HYDRANT \ \VEXISMNG 8" SEWER �\ +'" ' : �• �. 4. PROPOSED LAND USE. RESIDENTIAL \\ % EX SIGNAG TO BE s c' 6rIt2 I \ - TO BE RELOCATED n a \\ 5. EXISTING & PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN: SPECIFIC PLAN, SITE D. SEWER DRAIN LOW PLOW 680 ^w / " ie' 1�'E5 ` \ DIVERSION STRUCTURE 0 40 80 720 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640 680 720 760 8O0 840 880 92a 960 1000 1040 1080 1120 T- PCG i\` / 6. ALL STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND GRADING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE EX. 10" ACP WATER / aIV' .Z 26 Y WITH DIAMOND BAR STANDARDS, ORDINANCES AND APPROVED MODIFICATIONS HERETO. VIEW PROFILE #3 n s CONNECT I ON / i, r 930 135 Za / gE5M5 m TFr1CT 1VD. 3.2-074MP-40 MEDIA FILTER i EXISTING 8" SEWER / pR � .1 A0' 9 N 7. ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD SHALL BE ACCOMMODATED ON THE FINAL DESIGN, OR _ Q 25' arwL ` p -\ d big, 87�,. POYS 5J TU' 5 TREATMENT BMP THEY SHALL BE EITHER QUITCLAIMED, ABANDONED OR RELOCATED TO THE - NATURAL GROUND PROPOSED GRADING A 'W/NO 8 °' / \p \ a4o ?A ` PROPOSED MEDIAN 1a. O /V i ^ ^ 1$L' \ t` o SATISFACTION OF ALL INTERESTED PARTIES DRAINAGE AND PUBLIC UTILITY BOO 760 720 680 840 oy EASEMENTS NECESSARY TO SERVE THIS PROJECT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE EX SIGNAGE TO BE'Poo \ \` S CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AND WITH THE UTILITY PURVEYORS. EXISTING STORM DRAIN „w /L :136.5 pe° E \` d - \ \ �_\ -� UTILITY AGENCIES EASEMENTS WILL BE ABANDONED DURING THE FINAL MAP PROCEDURES. F \, TO BE RELOCATED aoo 7'r��1Cl' l\/O, r33 .A 17 1 \ o "� 2.yh t,z� e \o gj398 �\ -- -- ---- j p M \\ p 8. MULTI FAMILY BUILDING TO MEET NFPA 13 STANDARDS. - - �G � �� 1 •>'� 0 \\ e'� WATER: TRASH: (SINGLE FAMILY (SINGLE FAMILY HOMES PROPOSED SIGNAL T / & / 136 - o i� WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WASTE MANAGEMENT INC. 9. ESTIMATED EARTHWORK QUANTITIES: 415,500 CYS. CUT, 415,500 CYS. FILL. 760 \ CONNECT TO EXISMNc •w/ ^ 2 ` 271 S. BREA CANYON ROAD BALDW E. LIVE OAK AVE, 10' ACP WA7ER / \ 5 y 'o o \2 R o - - 136' q q 5 w WALNUT, CA 554 BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 10. SEWER SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION �e �� ppLL (909) 595-7554 (800) 266-7551 DISTRICT. TELEPHONE SERVICE: TRASH: (FOR MULTI -FAMILY) 11. PER LA COUNTY FIRM PANEL 1880 OF 2350. 720 \ .'W \ �p2 �!� / \ 115• 1 ° --- VERIZON VALLEY VISTA INC. p' 1400 PHILLIPS RANCH RD. 13940 E. LIVE OAK AVE 12. PRIVATE WATER QUALITY BMP'S TO BE MAINTAINED BY H.O.A. / 30' LASE eA�lEc� \ \ 61/ Po172ss -Iz`i \ \ p•12g8 \ N ,�\� 95 2 Ps1 t\ wPtEµ I POMONA, CA 91766 BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 sa0 \2'� \ a ,5 & 0\IE\� " \�,� \ \ ps1.GE55 iG ESM\ (800) 483-SOOD (800 266-7551 13. LOTS 62 & 63 ARE TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR &MAINTAINED BY THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. �0 w No - �+. • 81 h \ pot5g0 ESM E55 '+ x11$6\ 5 x7360 q6 81,q 051 ELECTRIC SERVICE: CABLE N: 14. ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG DIAMOND BAR BLVD, BREA CANYON RD AND 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 180 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 800 640 880 710 760 a00 840 880 920 / ` w 6 6�\ , \ PGG P r. 2 e \ \ E \ - /EX SIGNAGE TO BE 0 p000 h. 26. �ptl , h ,FREE C \ \ w \ \yPi� SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDSON CO. TIME WARNER PASADO DR. TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. / TO BE RELOCATED , .m \40H a 6`a 0 r gx1'11'0 J iN WB 5 - �. cK'P"o1 55 \ \ �% ?,170 ` --'o iG MSE !_LI. 1, - 800 CIENEGA AVE. 1041 E. ROUTE 66 TRr1CT l�lo �5DD] A \/ BE DE ICAWAY 70 E 5-4555 73 GLENDO A 91740 5 ALL RASH O INDIVIDUAL PCO BE O WASTE MANAGEMENT. STREET. RASH PICK UP FOR C/ -.- o' BE DEDICATED TO THE o z3-" /- "�\'9, P - °' �` g6' PO\E\CI \ ` \ 5 R C LOTST2 THROUGH 5NEEDS I70 BE LOCATED ON "B" STREET. TRASH PICK UP FOR CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 60% �, Po11 0 \ g SMS. w \ Po140 .1405 \ \ (800) 6SAN AS, CA 917 POSTAL SERVICE: LOT 1 WILL BE ALONG THE LOOP ALLEY. 0^� �`' �P ) , .1568`-� \ E -\ GAS SERVICE: USPS / �/ EX. 72 ACP WATER - -r 95 ",� P o ¢ 0 O `\ p•1365 `\� 5 1 P \ \�' ROVI P SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. 1317 SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BLVD, 16. LOTS 1-5 TO BE MAPPED FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES. i w w a' RrwL �s. 5x o6 ,- 11' x146' _ 3' B TI s r -SEX EALLe TO BE i x \ a P� 55 v P _ h 1 9cR' 1919 IS.M STATE COLLEGE BLVD. DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 ! / /fO�eE ALL _ / � � t�Z `'o �� \ 25' �� 0`N 0 \ \ o�� 2fi PG\Et5'I o \\ 01.5 Po198 `\`\ r' �1 � ° (800) 275-8777 17_ STORM DRAIN SYSTEM TO BE PRIVATE. PROPOSED MEDIA � -.' r- / r79' -� � s j6, A - g 5M5. P rs• A A � 11 V (800) 427-2200 06 EX POWER POLE/ v14� oj531 �� p�1 E 5 ^'se v - TION DISTRICT 18• EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED PER TREE SURVEY. \ �� p 0 4, a' �� \ 2' 318 2a "'4u \� `\\ SEWER SERVICE: (TR NK _ TO BE RELoca rED ` Mo o �� foo N�,Q1 `1,Ze .15yz\ 0 \ \ \ \ ey1 _-- \5 SCHOOL DISTRICT., LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION LI PROPOSED SIGNAL - - - a a P / & \ \ 960. _ ( \\ 1955 WORKMAN MILL ROAD. MODIFICATION AT PROPOSED R w, / \\ ,1132 Pot N ` 115 g, WALNUT VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT qC DIAMOND BAR BLVD 10"---- PROPOSED C E r \2.w e e \\ \ R \� \\ p� 5 .1168 `\ "' - LOT SUMMARY 5 HITTIER, CA 90607 6" 1.6" &BREA CANYON R0. �- 1 �' M13 \\ p' 2 � �' / 62 \ GF PER PLAN 6" 12" 12" -- �' � \\ 880 SOUTH LEMON AVEAVE. PROPOSEDSEo sI� i�- - O1126 \\ .. 9t2� ,� " e 6 \ \ 1 WALNUT, CA 91789 (562) 699-7411 Iw -- o •w� - ee p' \\ '( 55 1533 o d - \ \ , x156 \ \ \ 1 ,2 3 - Pa 8. pn1635 \\ SEWER SERVICE: MAIN LINES) /�' , 6 \\ O cE \ - \ o x \ o 'boa 16 �.� ( Lot No. Land Use Units Ades "" TO 12"W� 3 s v EX R/W.'- t \ 51 \\`6' PG \Ur 1P' -./ 8 O " P\ -. -Ex cuae °' � '" 82 ` J' �I4' `A � F � ` \ e."� X09 A � � LOS ANGELES COUNTY OF PUBLIC WORKS , 465 ` \ \ = 1iz , 615 i4 \\ SEWER MAINTENANCE DISTRICT LOT 1 MULTI -FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO 62 3.3 ..11 tN" o 1 �- '- / I R-� -• EX POWER POLEW_ ->.- - o, �-- �,.> -� i PG \d \\ ,1t1. /ctR� b �\ Po \ aR y0 6 \ - -12"IAS= t2"W - ^, - �- � \ \26' p50. P. � G 4 0{ 5 \o sj198 1 _ l P' \ 900 FREEMONT 70 BE RELOCATED -� 'v_ - _ i \ \ g M5. t 2 " 4' 55 \ �" 5 p / Z i 6/ �/• . R� e ;.:.6 � R=1/2" y -- Y - _ - r � _ _ _ 3.�`�.7p9u \ Es 1 � 1 \\ Q,, RE�; /' p.1 MSF I � \ ''\36' \ �\ 1t 2• y�Fu � 610 ; o. � � 1ALHAMBRA, CA LOTS 2-5 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDOS 73 5.9 - _ \-- 2't/'bd 9.1 o r Yl LOTS 6-52 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED 47 5.7 6 53-57 E - ..per r� j5A9 2• „ \\. \ \� o 0 16' �(� x - ` - O r 680 LOT SLOPES/OPEN SPACE 5.7 RIGHT-OF-WAY TD > ti6' �5 MSF R 6o R32 EX/ST/NG EASEMENTS :• , ... , 6 MP -40 TORW DRAIN \ \ Po ctR` 6 CI DE F E1,A ONb THE - / _ '' p r MEDIA FILTER 8 LOW FLOW 9 -� }8 0153 $ \ g 5M5' � 157 ( ( I A 1 / �- 4 6 TO 660 � 37 Y o� / 3' BROW R- 1, ' � � ,,.: � p � v E w �� p.1 Ms' �t ; 1 I °�. 9 ' ye p.l o r �� DITai, LOT 58 PRIVATE STREETS 4.0 V i./CITY OF DIx MONO BAR - V� DIVERSION 'o G 509 s1�1 6 _ �TYP �EATMENT B P � a'. :' .� '� CTDRE 26' K t,, P - o -� + 5 °' m 1>Z8 V\ \ 551 '1 y FWo(� 0 \\6 4qi( 665 o. i8 6 -- / „ 2 EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 74,EDISON PA COMPANY FOR PUBLIC UMLTMES LOT 59-61 PRIVATE DRIVEWAYS 0.1 6' CURB � GUTTER , / - - � - & y� � 1' E �g 0 25 � G' � Po � p.1 !Ry! I : o � � \Ps1 S �- m / �✓, x REC FEBRUARY 8, 7954 IN BOOK 43774, PAGE 74L O.R. a' ROLLED CURB k CUTLER Fo. .1 ti/ / 3y ii a/ _ _ x LOT 62 RAIN GARDEN PARK/BASIN 3.8 7 P o / ° O NTS MS s- / r / s- `p, 4 .155'3 5' \ .1\6A 3 /' /' 5 u/M I ` ` xx� 3 EASEMENT IN GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, A CORPORA nON / ^a5' r 25' m / P 534 \ P TJ v N 1 r / 185' \ 'ly 70 / FOR POLE LINES REG APRIL 28, 1954 /N BOOK 44446, PAGE 33, O.R. LOT 63 PARK 0.9 (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) / p / ^0 \ r 3Qv / o\#'� N Ow / PGGESCI "- pal Y 160 / P' h9 atm'' \. \ 3 r / j,.5 r Y'` �, q0 15 �_ X ix `• ^ / / 'y ,32�y 108 =1 �_ 2 U Ot l s' I o O �� 16 ' \ ` ✓ O6 EASEMENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR STORM GRAIN PURPOSES AS SHOWN ON TRACT Na 27577 REC. IN RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATED TO 0.5 / s2- s ✓ 0 / `ZC 7 / / r I �� y t a? cv? y .1 g E55A5. 9 2 �• 548 \ P•756' x°.$W ! u I^ : /r g0 / i'' _ P' I^ o I 910 BK 702, PGS. 22 TO 25 INCLUSIVE OF MAPS RECORDS LOS ANGELES COUNTY. THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR a z• �O2,Po / /// / / r/.K.' ;\'- 1 p•j11' Pal ` ss s( - I I 645 / e2 1. 31 iN r Ex CUR e: cS i/ o a \ . .-. - r�\\ \ 1 16 ;'' °QQp0° ,^ o ° r a - 6 - - - Z - I I P' /' 9 a� 0 \ P' EASEMENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR WATER PIPELINES REC AUGUST 31, 1960 AS INST No. 3778, IN BK; TOTAL 182 29.9 EX. ��W / 0 4, 2 / /' / / Qr 00 ; �, f 9 $ X / 5 2 p \ l _ ^C 41 , 0 ' / y0 / S 24 ! \ i1 'o �. x' DI TOE R/ 2 r -s, > ` 56 535 a M TCH. TVP 3• EX POWER POLE O / / }`P 0r" 0�" / r r y �� /c pGGE 5t a1 P' 740 I ) ��- 1 4 0° R 0962 PAGE 305, O.R. SURVEYORS NOTE.' EASEMENT FOLLOWS THE CENTERLINE OF DIAMOND BAR BLVD., AND UTILITIES PROPOSED CURB �/ b O ^s / _ r ''6 / Q 25' pSVU j R -;y9: - / ^ G /�' Oti OJ•� �// / j NO WIDTH IS GIVEN IN THE DOCUMENT GARAGE 70 BE RELOCATED,. PROPOSED R/W / �`° �� > 50. g 5Ml ob -- q '� 55 6' `R' / y y L ,o / R^ / 7r �: 511 1 U i _PEDESTRIAN l -- 6"°'/r '/ -16 6 'i 17 EASEMENT 7 THE PUBLIC FOR STREET PURPOSES AS SHOWN ON TRACT No, 25989 REG. IN BK. 714, BENCH MAR/ o. DOOR / / Y . h / / ^ � 0 ?8• 1 .1 � 9' � � P' moo. I L, PGS: 5 70 7 OF MAPS RECORDS OF COS ANGELES COUNTY. 6 I ^� / O� "> / Of �°+ / y o y, r/rn-FS&; 'zs,''•. PGGE5E5M5 N Pot gg `�� r �; II 4� o �s1ke� �'^ 6, S2 ti' ` 'x LOS ANGELES COUNTY BENCHMARK NO. G 5073 ELEVATION: 726.809 DATUM: NAVD 88, 2% 2� % MIN / / / y� N f / �2 \ �A SMT 5 �StUN tC w\ / ;'s, r /�o . 2 1hA° �� / `�� 20 o- ,vn a5 / /i 3 EASEMENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR STORM DRAINS AND SANITARY SEWER AS SHOWN ON TRACT NO. 27577 2005 ADJUSTMENT Ny,9�'%��o• r' �,. ^ A ✓�, / A ❑ REC IN BK 702, PGS 22 TO 25 INCLUSIVE OF MAPS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY. ',' `o / / / Q °o / / I �N r C"' �° ro° �ao� `° / - pa755' sF/v4 r ✓o' / =Y/ i o F' , , 0 ri A Et . a0 7 2r' / v _ r • / 0 �C 15' xo 7g. 1� ,/; 2a ( .a / ! - / r r /< , 166. / DESCRIPTION: FOR GAS PIPE LINES, LIGHT, POWER ® EASEMENT 70 SOUTHERN COUNTIES GAS COMPANY Of CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TAG IN EAST CURB OF DIAMOND PURPOSES REC. FEBRUARY 17, 1964 REC. AS INST. 3774, O.R. BAR BLVD. 42.7 FEET EAST OF CENTERLINE AND 95 FEET NORTH OF CENTERLINE OF / / Yr / A // ( y . l h y Mr / b , -� ra 4i .,9 '), s` so, ✓ .ti /�' ,/ CROOKED CREEK DRIVE. a z D O AU m f 9x153' r r /2. o �� 5 EASEMENT TO THE DIAMOND BAR WATER COMPANY FOR WATER PIPES REQ AUGUST 31, 1960 REC IN BK. /y /o•0' 6 - ' r ! ✓ /j r o 4 ti 6s / x D-962, PAGE 305, O.R. AND REC DATE. AUGUST 10, 1964 AS INST. No, 3417 O.R. 0' CURB DETAIL 675 ---fl _ �O-e LOT` > O' �v �o /ir �� w ✓4 P szv .1655 ❑ SURVEYOR'S NOTE' / 0 i d / r >fl d r ti P EASEMENT FOLLOWS THECENTERLINE OF DIAMOND BAR BLVD., NO WIDTH IS GIVEN 12 NTS / GR �� / / R,goY N0° / �0 (.�,�� / ,1.. ^%'a a / /` 5 i ''s. i0.,. / : 0O r / IN THE DOCUMENT FOR REFERENCE ONLY % 3 ARK o �' A ti e / p .y /3' 6t / / a / / / sem, C p % r L Si /X 3' BROW / LEGAL /E / DE�+CR//�T/ON ( ) / / a P, r / 7 o' ✓ 10,' / ^�`, / P' / / . 114. x v ; ; / ^b Q a T / DITCH, nP L GAL S i�� 6 EASEMENT TO THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FOR SANITARY SEWER PURPOSES REC. NOVEMBER 11, 1971 - 3 ❑ AS INST. 3366, OR. 4 /� BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 9 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO 4 EXISTING / / V' / (� 's, ' 6 / / q Rrni /moo ✓v r 'xY /@ MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, GOUTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. UNDERGROUND l / / / A r Iti ��� / Q` a 0 ">0 154 55 a �"5 x tj. / EASEMENT TO THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FOR .STORM GRAIN, INGRESS AND EGRESS REG. DATE SURFACE FLOWS G`v. / 0'b 01 •� ' P' / ,11 / s„� sy / 'x 0 7 '1 3 / r lid P'pa0 / MAY iB, 1982 AS INST. 82-508759, 0 R 9 / -z 45 � is x`<v �r � ^ 161.5 lJ> i h/ ' /� ,.�1 o r P- s- / r ,,'' G STATEMENT OF OWNERSHIP / > ^ \ � o r / � / � / `A` az / 154• \%cR ,l'' / ^° br .+�. r / / �26 ' � � � 5 �. o � � � .ti i J � / 'O � \ � ' �u2 1695 / � � < y�J ��- ^� ^OG /./ ✓ 6'S 1� l i� 1548 P' �."�'�� �'4 �j5�0V SOA/ O LOT Mv9 Q• 1 \ I _ _ - - / C / �- % Po 46 b ^ > 'il x I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED UNDER MY 1, 1fro m 1 / P / ! s , 6 /+ I / / : es ^ �0 �' SA 90' c, �j� y i� 1 p 2�^ 15' ^ ti y /' SG�� SINGLE FAMILY SUPERVISION AND THAT THE OWNER OF RECORD HAS KNOWLEDGE ((�' r / r 9 15 ,�� m 9 � r 1. o R° ' �� oA° 5 `�' 0� � `✓ s m Pal ^ pa /� vp1^ / OF AND CONSENTS TO THE FILING OF THIS MAP. �. s a \ o / N / �. Pa 5 P� s, b ^ T O - - s.. \ h '1 / i✓ 3' Tnr/ V/ FlRE TRUCK VQ �P 155.0 TURNING RADIUS DETAIL 30' ANDSCAPE SETBACK ( 256 m J� x,32 / / h5 A A P' O NTS / f p s. ^ --- -8. ' / 1 "J 7r�r� �� 1v�i-% �176� � 1 � _ _ I 7py0 - . 5 5 � li u, � R � 4 �i ��i / / Rp 2 � 79.05 �; S r? ICT IID, ,3�1b(J i 55 �� I -p `V• ��� /' rt ' y,A x'49. 0 �15J`8 idsV ' /`� �� ^ /o- / Zc 11 � � v �,4P``' , rg 14 � v"7w✓ ^ � yof ,�// p,l 1 / 4 'C' / TYPICAL STREET SECT/ONS 7 v M ^ M z5 �� ��' pa1�o 6D;� -.0 y TRE/ f..... 65 P/1560 41p s pyo / /' GO ' l R� � Jl� L�J�J PEDESTRIfAIy ACCESS ONLY \ _ R W RAW l EMERGENCY �2:.> sT r/✓ 1b rn�_ p -'L{1 3% W - / 6s / �� NCREss/EGRESS v e° a" 156' a ^, P 5' 5' / - - f 6 0 saos � -, o ^ c510 � � ss' 15 29' P VARIES h' 11 25' 14' 26' S' 8' VARIES / .� V �' �� rr \ \ a5 p+ Pa se A ^ ME IAN' LANOSCgPE LANDSCAPE 3' TOE DITCH, TYP = t6 ti \ 5 tiPGS / 12' EASEM NT ?, I 1 Mn'T Q5� 1 v ^ 2i '., , s ^o^ 9.15 N oti / � - 2� 15 0' z' T 1• m 8' EASEMENT MqX \ I , ` O 1 2' 74. 14.0' 2' 0.5' EASEMENT o.5• 2' 12.0' 2' 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK L �� _ � 4 +\�s, `S gypsy 1$ / � i' `�� / / ` 0.5' 0.5' 0.5 �T' 0.5' 5' SIDEWALK 5' SIDEWALK t M 'I MpY' C.1 MpL 2\ Mp1' 8" CURB EMERGENCY e A A C / 1 26X 2 5 PARKWAY 5" PARKWAY v � 6 6' CURB & GIJ 6" CURB & GUTTER INGRESS/EGRESS 39 2 \ C�\ �' % % / / \ 2:A M�' I14tak SWALf SWALE Zr'M'4'1' SECTION A -A , K \\ J ¢ ¢ a so 6 5 AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM NUMBER OF UNITS Summary of Areas CONDO NUMBER AREA Lot No. S.F Acres Lot No. S.F Acres 6 7,867 0.181 30 5,127 0.118 7 5,295 0.122 31 6,674 0.153 8 4,945 0.114 32 6,329 0.145 9 4,928 0.113 33 5,346 0.123 10 5,140 0.118 34 4,408 PROPOSED 11 4,857 Pad=7 6.0'CK 4,235 0.097 12 4,761 -' 36 4,227 0.097 13 7,033 0.161 37 4,230 0.097 14 PR POSED 38 4,232 0.097 15 A' ST. 0.107 t 29 30 0.102 16 4,328 0.099 40 4,652 0.107 17 2 0.107 EXIS ING G DE 18 7,473 0.172 42 4,924 0.113 a = - 0.14 43 5,159 -- ---- 5,022 1 44 5,347 0.123 21 5,214 0.12 45 5,297 0.122 clLot 5,731 0.132 46 5,683 0.13 23 5,419 0.124 47 4,169 9 24 7,196 0.165 48 4,808 0.11 25 4,577 0.105 49 5,911 0.135 26 5,214 0.12 50 5,466 0.125 27 5,631 0.129 51 4,645 0.107 28 6,414 0.147 52 5,160 0.118 29 4,763 ISTIN ---- --- --- ---- ---- -- 5. DI OND BAR - - - -' P OPOSE Pa =727.5 -d=72S± Pa =722.02 Ot PROP SED RETAINING WALL P OPOS RETAIN NG WA PR L POSED GRADE m 840 oy EASEMENTS NECESSARY TO SERVE THIS PROJECT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE EX SIGNAGE TO BE'Poo \ \` S CITY OF DIAMOND BAR AND WITH THE UTILITY PURVEYORS. EXISTING STORM DRAIN „w /L :136.5 pe° E \` d - \ \ �_\ -� UTILITY AGENCIES EASEMENTS WILL BE ABANDONED DURING THE FINAL MAP PROCEDURES. F \, TO BE RELOCATED aoo 7'r��1Cl' l\/O, r33 .A 17 1 \ o "� 2.yh t,z� e \o gj398 �\ -- -- ---- j p M \\ p 8. MULTI FAMILY BUILDING TO MEET NFPA 13 STANDARDS. - - �G � �� 1 •>'� 0 \\ e'� WATER: TRASH: (SINGLE FAMILY (SINGLE FAMILY HOMES PROPOSED SIGNAL T / & / 136 - o i� WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WASTE MANAGEMENT INC. 9. ESTIMATED EARTHWORK QUANTITIES: 415,500 CYS. CUT, 415,500 CYS. FILL. 760 \ CONNECT TO EXISMNc •w/ ^ 2 ` 271 S. BREA CANYON ROAD BALDW E. LIVE OAK AVE, 10' ACP WA7ER / \ 5 y 'o o \2 R o - - 136' q q 5 w WALNUT, CA 554 BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 10. SEWER SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION �e �� ppLL (909) 595-7554 (800) 266-7551 DISTRICT. TELEPHONE SERVICE: TRASH: (FOR MULTI -FAMILY) 11. PER LA COUNTY FIRM PANEL 1880 OF 2350. 720 \ .'W \ �p2 �!� / \ 115• 1 ° --- VERIZON VALLEY VISTA INC. p' 1400 PHILLIPS RANCH RD. 13940 E. LIVE OAK AVE 12. PRIVATE WATER QUALITY BMP'S TO BE MAINTAINED BY H.O.A. / 30' LASE eA�lEc� \ \ 61/ Po172ss -Iz`i \ \ p•12g8 \ N ,�\� 95 2 Ps1 t\ wPtEµ I POMONA, CA 91766 BALDWIN PARK, CA 91706 sa0 \2'� \ a ,5 & 0\IE\� " \�,� \ \ ps1.GE55 iG ESM\ (800) 483-SOOD (800 266-7551 13. LOTS 62 & 63 ARE TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR &MAINTAINED BY THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. �0 w No - �+. • 81 h \ pot5g0 ESM E55 '+ x11$6\ 5 x7360 q6 81,q 051 ELECTRIC SERVICE: CABLE N: 14. ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG DIAMOND BAR BLVD, BREA CANYON RD AND 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 180 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 800 640 880 710 760 a00 840 880 920 / ` w 6 6�\ , \ PGG P r. 2 e \ \ E \ - /EX SIGNAGE TO BE 0 p000 h. 26. �ptl , h ,FREE C \ \ w \ \yPi� SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDSON CO. TIME WARNER PASADO DR. TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR. / TO BE RELOCATED , .m \40H a 6`a 0 r gx1'11'0 J iN WB 5 - �. cK'P"o1 55 \ \ �% ?,170 ` --'o iG MSE !_LI. 1, - 800 CIENEGA AVE. 1041 E. ROUTE 66 TRr1CT l�lo �5DD] A \/ BE DE ICAWAY 70 E 5-4555 73 GLENDO A 91740 5 ALL RASH O INDIVIDUAL PCO BE O WASTE MANAGEMENT. STREET. RASH PICK UP FOR C/ -.- o' BE DEDICATED TO THE o z3-" /- "�\'9, P - °' �` g6' PO\E\CI \ ` \ 5 R C LOTST2 THROUGH 5NEEDS I70 BE LOCATED ON "B" STREET. TRASH PICK UP FOR CITY OF DIAMOND BAR 60% �, Po11 0 \ g SMS. w \ Po140 .1405 \ \ (800) 6SAN AS, CA 917 POSTAL SERVICE: LOT 1 WILL BE ALONG THE LOOP ALLEY. 0^� �`' �P ) , .1568`-� \ E -\ GAS SERVICE: USPS / �/ EX. 72 ACP WATER - -r 95 ",� P o ¢ 0 O `\ p•1365 `\� 5 1 P \ \�' ROVI P SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. 1317 SOUTH DIAMOND BAR BLVD, 16. LOTS 1-5 TO BE MAPPED FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES. i w w a' RrwL �s. 5x o6 ,- 11' x146' _ 3' B TI s r -SEX EALLe TO BE i x \ a P� 55 v P _ h 1 9cR' 1919 IS.M STATE COLLEGE BLVD. DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 ! / /fO�eE ALL _ / � � t�Z `'o �� \ 25' �� 0`N 0 \ \ o�� 2fi PG\Et5'I o \\ 01.5 Po198 `\`\ r' �1 � ° (800) 275-8777 17_ STORM DRAIN SYSTEM TO BE PRIVATE. PROPOSED MEDIA � -.' r- / r79' -� � s j6, A - g 5M5. P rs• A A � 11 V (800) 427-2200 06 EX POWER POLE/ v14� oj531 �� p�1 E 5 ^'se v - TION DISTRICT 18• EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED PER TREE SURVEY. \ �� p 0 4, a' �� \ 2' 318 2a "'4u \� `\\ SEWER SERVICE: (TR NK _ TO BE RELoca rED ` Mo o �� foo N�,Q1 `1,Ze .15yz\ 0 \ \ \ \ ey1 _-- \5 SCHOOL DISTRICT., LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION LI PROPOSED SIGNAL - - - a a P / & \ \ 960. _ ( \\ 1955 WORKMAN MILL ROAD. MODIFICATION AT PROPOSED R w, / \\ ,1132 Pot N ` 115 g, WALNUT VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT qC DIAMOND BAR BLVD 10"---- PROPOSED C E r \2.w e e \\ \ R \� \\ p� 5 .1168 `\ "' - LOT SUMMARY 5 HITTIER, CA 90607 6" 1.6" &BREA CANYON R0. �- 1 �' M13 \\ p' 2 � �' / 62 \ GF PER PLAN 6" 12" 12" -- �' � \\ 880 SOUTH LEMON AVEAVE. PROPOSEDSEo sI� i�- - O1126 \\ .. 9t2� ,� " e 6 \ \ 1 WALNUT, CA 91789 (562) 699-7411 Iw -- o •w� - ee p' \\ '( 55 1533 o d - \ \ , x156 \ \ \ 1 ,2 3 - Pa 8. pn1635 \\ SEWER SERVICE: MAIN LINES) /�' , 6 \\ O cE \ - \ o x \ o 'boa 16 �.� ( Lot No. Land Use Units Ades "" TO 12"W� 3 s v EX R/W.'- t \ 51 \\`6' PG \Ur 1P' -./ 8 O " P\ -. -Ex cuae °' � '" 82 ` J' �I4' `A � F � ` \ e."� X09 A � � LOS ANGELES COUNTY OF PUBLIC WORKS , 465 ` \ \ = 1iz , 615 i4 \\ SEWER MAINTENANCE DISTRICT LOT 1 MULTI -FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO 62 3.3 ..11 tN" o 1 �- '- / I R-� -• EX POWER POLEW_ ->.- - o, �-- �,.> -� i PG \d \\ ,1t1. /ctR� b �\ Po \ aR y0 6 \ - -12"IAS= t2"W - ^, - �- � \ \26' p50. P. � G 4 0{ 5 \o sj198 1 _ l P' \ 900 FREEMONT 70 BE RELOCATED -� 'v_ - _ i \ \ g M5. t 2 " 4' 55 \ �" 5 p / Z i 6/ �/• . R� e ;.:.6 � R=1/2" y -- Y - _ - r � _ _ _ 3.�`�.7p9u \ Es 1 � 1 \\ Q,, RE�; /' p.1 MSF I � \ ''\36' \ �\ 1t 2• y�Fu � 610 ; o. � � 1ALHAMBRA, CA LOTS 2-5 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDOS 73 5.9 - _ \-- 2't/'bd 9.1 o r Yl LOTS 6-52 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED 47 5.7 6 53-57 E - ..per r� j5A9 2• „ \\. \ \� o 0 16' �(� x - ` - O r 680 LOT SLOPES/OPEN SPACE 5.7 RIGHT-OF-WAY TD > ti6' �5 MSF R 6o R32 EX/ST/NG EASEMENTS :• , ... , 6 MP -40 TORW DRAIN \ \ Po ctR` 6 CI DE F E1,A ONb THE - / _ '' p r MEDIA FILTER 8 LOW FLOW 9 -� }8 0153 $ \ g 5M5' � 157 ( ( I A 1 / �- 4 6 TO 660 � 37 Y o� / 3' BROW R- 1, ' � � ,,.: � p � v E w �� p.1 Ms' �t ; 1 I °�. 9 ' ye p.l o r �� DITai, LOT 58 PRIVATE STREETS 4.0 V i./CITY OF DIx MONO BAR - V� DIVERSION 'o G 509 s1�1 6 _ �TYP �EATMENT B P � a'. :' .� '� CTDRE 26' K t,, P - o -� + 5 °' m 1>Z8 V\ \ 551 '1 y FWo(� 0 \\6 4qi( 665 o. i8 6 -- / „ 2 EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 74,EDISON PA COMPANY FOR PUBLIC UMLTMES LOT 59-61 PRIVATE DRIVEWAYS 0.1 6' CURB � GUTTER , / - - � - & y� � 1' E �g 0 25 � G' � Po � p.1 !Ry! I : o � � \Ps1 S �- m / �✓, x REC FEBRUARY 8, 7954 IN BOOK 43774, PAGE 74L O.R. a' ROLLED CURB k CUTLER Fo. .1 ti/ / 3y ii a/ _ _ x LOT 62 RAIN GARDEN PARK/BASIN 3.8 7 P o / ° O NTS MS s- / r / s- `p, 4 .155'3 5' \ .1\6A 3 /' /' 5 u/M I ` ` xx� 3 EASEMENT IN GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, A CORPORA nON / ^a5' r 25' m / P 534 \ P TJ v N 1 r / 185' \ 'ly 70 / FOR POLE LINES REG APRIL 28, 1954 /N BOOK 44446, PAGE 33, O.R. LOT 63 PARK 0.9 (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) / p / ^0 \ r 3Qv / o\#'� N Ow / PGGESCI "- pal Y 160 / P' h9 atm'' \. \ 3 r / j,.5 r Y'` �, q0 15 �_ X ix `• ^ / / 'y ,32�y 108 =1 �_ 2 U Ot l s' I o O �� 16 ' \ ` ✓ O6 EASEMENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR STORM GRAIN PURPOSES AS SHOWN ON TRACT Na 27577 REC. IN RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATED TO 0.5 / s2- s ✓ 0 / `ZC 7 / / r I �� y t a? cv? y .1 g E55A5. 9 2 �• 548 \ P•756' x°.$W ! u I^ : /r g0 / i'' _ P' I^ o I 910 BK 702, PGS. 22 TO 25 INCLUSIVE OF MAPS RECORDS LOS ANGELES COUNTY. THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR a z• �O2,Po / /// / / r/.K.' ;\'- 1 p•j11' Pal ` ss s( - I I 645 / e2 1. 31 iN r Ex CUR e: cS i/ o a \ . .-. - r�\\ \ 1 16 ;'' °QQp0° ,^ o ° r a - 6 - - - Z - I I P' /' 9 a� 0 \ P' EASEMENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR WATER PIPELINES REC AUGUST 31, 1960 AS INST No. 3778, IN BK; TOTAL 182 29.9 EX. ��W / 0 4, 2 / /' / / Qr 00 ; �, f 9 $ X / 5 2 p \ l _ ^C 41 , 0 ' / y0 / S 24 ! \ i1 'o �. x' DI TOE R/ 2 r -s, > ` 56 535 a M TCH. TVP 3• EX POWER POLE O / / }`P 0r" 0�" / r r y �� /c pGGE 5t a1 P' 740 I ) ��- 1 4 0° R 0962 PAGE 305, O.R. SURVEYORS NOTE.' EASEMENT FOLLOWS THE CENTERLINE OF DIAMOND BAR BLVD., AND UTILITIES PROPOSED CURB �/ b O ^s / _ r ''6 / Q 25' pSVU j R -;y9: - / ^ G /�' Oti OJ•� �// / j NO WIDTH IS GIVEN IN THE DOCUMENT GARAGE 70 BE RELOCATED,. PROPOSED R/W / �`° �� > 50. g 5Ml ob -- q '� 55 6' `R' / y y L ,o / R^ / 7r �: 511 1 U i _PEDESTRIAN l -- 6"°'/r '/ -16 6 'i 17 EASEMENT 7 THE PUBLIC FOR STREET PURPOSES AS SHOWN ON TRACT No, 25989 REG. IN BK. 714, BENCH MAR/ o. DOOR / / Y . h / / ^ � 0 ?8• 1 .1 � 9' � � P' moo. I L, PGS: 5 70 7 OF MAPS RECORDS OF COS ANGELES COUNTY. 6 I ^� / O� "> / Of �°+ / y o y, r/rn-FS&; 'zs,''•. PGGE5E5M5 N Pot gg `�� r �; II 4� o �s1ke� �'^ 6, S2 ti' ` 'x LOS ANGELES COUNTY BENCHMARK NO. G 5073 ELEVATION: 726.809 DATUM: NAVD 88, 2% 2� % MIN / / / y� N f / �2 \ �A SMT 5 �StUN tC w\ / ;'s, r /�o . 2 1hA° �� / `�� 20 o- ,vn a5 / /i 3 EASEMENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR STORM DRAINS AND SANITARY SEWER AS SHOWN ON TRACT NO. 27577 2005 ADJUSTMENT Ny,9�'%��o• r' �,. ^ A ✓�, / A ❑ REC IN BK 702, PGS 22 TO 25 INCLUSIVE OF MAPS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY. ',' `o / / / Q °o / / I �N r C"' �° ro° �ao� `° / - pa755' sF/v4 r ✓o' / =Y/ i o F' , , 0 ri A Et . a0 7 2r' / v _ r • / 0 �C 15' xo 7g. 1� ,/; 2a ( .a / ! - / r r /< , 166. / DESCRIPTION: FOR GAS PIPE LINES, LIGHT, POWER ® EASEMENT 70 SOUTHERN COUNTIES GAS COMPANY Of CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TAG IN EAST CURB OF DIAMOND PURPOSES REC. FEBRUARY 17, 1964 REC. AS INST. 3774, O.R. BAR BLVD. 42.7 FEET EAST OF CENTERLINE AND 95 FEET NORTH OF CENTERLINE OF / / Yr / A // ( y . l h y Mr / b , -� ra 4i .,9 '), s` so, ✓ .ti /�' ,/ CROOKED CREEK DRIVE. a z D O AU m f 9x153' r r /2. o �� 5 EASEMENT TO THE DIAMOND BAR WATER COMPANY FOR WATER PIPES REQ AUGUST 31, 1960 REC IN BK. /y /o•0' 6 - ' r ! ✓ /j r o 4 ti 6s / x D-962, PAGE 305, O.R. AND REC DATE. AUGUST 10, 1964 AS INST. No, 3417 O.R. 0' CURB DETAIL 675 ---fl _ �O-e LOT` > O' �v �o /ir �� w ✓4 P szv .1655 ❑ SURVEYOR'S NOTE' / 0 i d / r >fl d r ti P EASEMENT FOLLOWS THECENTERLINE OF DIAMOND BAR BLVD., NO WIDTH IS GIVEN 12 NTS / GR �� / / R,goY N0° / �0 (.�,�� / ,1.. ^%'a a / /` 5 i ''s. i0.,. / : 0O r / IN THE DOCUMENT FOR REFERENCE ONLY % 3 ARK o �' A ti e / p .y /3' 6t / / a / / / sem, C p % r L Si /X 3' BROW / LEGAL /E / DE�+CR//�T/ON ( ) / / a P, r / 7 o' ✓ 10,' / ^�`, / P' / / . 114. x v ; ; / ^b Q a T / DITCH, nP L GAL S i�� 6 EASEMENT TO THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FOR SANITARY SEWER PURPOSES REC. NOVEMBER 11, 1971 - 3 ❑ AS INST. 3366, OR. 4 /� BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 9 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO 4 EXISTING / / V' / (� 's, ' 6 / / q Rrni /moo ✓v r 'xY /@ MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, GOUTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. UNDERGROUND l / / / A r Iti ��� / Q` a 0 ">0 154 55 a �"5 x tj. / EASEMENT TO THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FOR .STORM GRAIN, INGRESS AND EGRESS REG. DATE SURFACE FLOWS G`v. / 0'b 01 •� ' P' / ,11 / s„� sy / 'x 0 7 '1 3 / r lid P'pa0 / MAY iB, 1982 AS INST. 82-508759, 0 R 9 / -z 45 � is x`<v �r � ^ 161.5 lJ> i h/ ' /� ,.�1 o r P- s- / r ,,'' G STATEMENT OF OWNERSHIP / > ^ \ � o r / � / � / `A` az / 154• \%cR ,l'' / ^° br .+�. r / / �26 ' � � � 5 �. o � � � .ti i J � / 'O � \ � ' �u2 1695 / � � < y�J ��- ^� ^OG /./ ✓ 6'S 1� l i� 1548 P' �."�'�� �'4 �j5�0V SOA/ O LOT Mv9 Q• 1 \ I _ _ - - / C / �- % Po 46 b ^ > 'il x I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED UNDER MY 1, 1fro m 1 / P / ! s , 6 /+ I / / : es ^ �0 �' SA 90' c, �j� y i� 1 p 2�^ 15' ^ ti y /' SG�� SINGLE FAMILY SUPERVISION AND THAT THE OWNER OF RECORD HAS KNOWLEDGE ((�' r / r 9 15 ,�� m 9 � r 1. o R° ' �� oA° 5 `�' 0� � `✓ s m Pal ^ pa /� vp1^ / OF AND CONSENTS TO THE FILING OF THIS MAP. �. s a \ o / N / �. Pa 5 P� s, b ^ T O - - s.. \ h '1 / i✓ 3' Tnr/ V/ FlRE TRUCK VQ �P 155.0 TURNING RADIUS DETAIL 30' ANDSCAPE SETBACK ( 256 m J� x,32 / / h5 A A P' O NTS / f p s. ^ --- -8. ' / 1 "J 7r�r� �� 1v�i-% �176� � 1 � _ _ I 7py0 - . 5 5 � li u, � R � 4 �i ��i / / Rp 2 � 79.05 �; S r? ICT IID, ,3�1b(J i 55 �� I -p `V• ��� /' rt ' y,A x'49. 0 �15J`8 idsV ' /`� �� ^ /o- / Zc 11 � � v �,4P``' , rg 14 � v"7w✓ ^ � yof ,�// p,l 1 / 4 'C' / TYPICAL STREET SECT/ONS 7 v M ^ M z5 �� ��' pa1�o 6D;� -.0 y TRE/ f..... 65 P/1560 41p s pyo / /' GO ' l R� � Jl� L�J�J PEDESTRIfAIy ACCESS ONLY \ _ R W RAW l EMERGENCY �2:.> sT r/✓ 1b rn�_ p -'L{1 3% W - / 6s / �� NCREss/EGRESS v e° a" 156' a ^, P 5' 5' / - - f 6 0 saos � -, o ^ c510 � � ss' 15 29' P VARIES h' 11 25' 14' 26' S' 8' VARIES / .� V �' �� rr \ \ a5 p+ Pa se A ^ ME IAN' LANOSCgPE LANDSCAPE 3' TOE DITCH, TYP = t6 ti \ 5 tiPGS / 12' EASEM NT ?, I 1 Mn'T Q5� 1 v ^ 2i '., , s ^o^ 9.15 N oti / � - 2� 15 0' z' T 1• m 8' EASEMENT MqX \ I , ` O 1 2' 74. 14.0' 2' 0.5' EASEMENT o.5• 2' 12.0' 2' 30' LANDSCAPE SETBACK L �� _ � 4 +\�s, `S gypsy 1$ / � i' `�� / / ` 0.5' 0.5' 0.5 �T' 0.5' 5' SIDEWALK 5' SIDEWALK t M 'I MpY' C.1 MpL 2\ Mp1' 8" CURB EMERGENCY e A A C / 1 26X 2 5 PARKWAY 5" PARKWAY v � 6 6' CURB & GIJ 6" CURB & GUTTER INGRESS/EGRESS 39 2 \ C�\ �' % % / / \ 2:A M�' I14tak SWALf SWALE Zr'M'4'1' SECTION A -A , K \\ J ¢ ¢ a so 6 5 AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM AC BERM DATE EDWARD A. MANDICH MAP DATE IDENTIFIER Dn E GF Urex a NGE To Txs MAF 07/30/13 BY: LP 09a19F 13 NUMBER OF UNITS Summary of Areas CONDO NUMBER AREA Lot No. S.F Acres Lot No. S.F Acres 6 7,867 0.181 30 5,127 0.118 7 5,295 0.122 31 6,674 0.153 8 4,945 0.114 32 6,329 0.145 9 4,928 0.113 33 5,346 0.123 10 5,140 0.118 34 4,408 0.101 11 4,857 0.111 35 4,235 0.097 12 4,761 0.109 36 4,227 0.097 13 7,033 0.161 37 4,230 0.097 14 4,902 0.113 38 4,232 0.097 15 4,646 0.107 39 4,462 0.102 16 4,328 0.099 40 4,652 0.107 17 4,682 0.107 41 4,715 0.108 18 7,473 0.172 42 4,924 0.113 19 6,095 0.14 43 5,159 0.118 20 5,022 0.115 44 5,347 0.123 21 5,214 0.12 45 5,297 0.122 22 5,731 0.132 46 5,683 0.13 23 5,419 0.124 47 4,169 0.096 24 7,196 0.165 48 4,808 0.11 25 4,577 0.105 49 5,911 0.135 26 5,214 0.12 50 5,466 0.125 27 5,631 0.129 51 4,645 0.107 28 6,414 0.147 52 5,160 0.118 29 4,763 0.109 DATE EDWARD A. MANDICH MAP DATE IDENTIFIER Dn E GF Urex a NGE To Txs MAF 07/30/13 BY: LP 09a19F 13 EMRY- PORTION O 'A'S RLC/ R/W R/W R/W R/W NORTHERLY L SOUTHERLY RICHT OF WAY TO o pp 4�� At \ AC BERM TOTAL GROSS 247,342 S.F. Sd' R/W 54' R/W R/W R/W BE DEDICATED TO THE / S 'j \ 5.7 AC. UUI 3Q, 2013 (PRIVATE) 46' R/w CITY of DIAMOND BAR / / SECTION 1-1 SECTION J -J SECTION K -K DATE Y 27.0' 27.0' 27.0' AVERAGE GROSS 5,263 S.F. 18`55-162AX 1 �22:3f' 23.8' �--''�' LO 55 � `�- �k EMER(�NCYACCESS ROAD SERVICE ACCESS ROAD PEDESTRIAWSERVICEACCESS ROAD W.O. 1 9.0' _ 36' _ 9.0'1 1 14.0' 26' 14.0' 1 d `" (PRWATE) (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) FEET Oa 7 0(- + SECTION B -B ENTRY - PORTION OF 'A"' STREET (PRIVATE) 1 3•" 209, -� URB �6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB &GUTTER- �8' SIDEWALK SECTION L -L EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) WALL 14' 1100 13' 13' 10' 4'1 2' I cuwv cltWv 2•. CURB &� -CURB & GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER SECTION C -C SECTION D -D 'A' STREET - LOCAL STREET 'IIT - LOCAL STREET (TAPER) PARKING BOTH SIDES NO PARKING (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) F - PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ROW I sa' sa' I f I 8' 42' 8' 4' 42' 8'1 I I I I I 2.0% I 2 09, CUR 6° CURB&GUTTER 8 810 6" CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED S' SIDEWALK 8' SIDEWALK SECTION L -L PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) SECTION E -E Ar STREET - LOCAL STREET PARKING BOTH SIDES (PRIVATE) Oc 117 / O�� / R/W @ r�PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS R/W R%W I®® I 50' 1 60" 8' 50' 50' 1 8' 35' 4' 63' 35' 4' 45' e'1 �1 3' I II 3 I MPX �. � 20% - - - 1 2.09 1'A 2.0% m m CURBT�n L PROPOSED CURB RETAINING WALL -6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK SECTION M -M SECTION M -M EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) 35' 4 35 I Mir _ `-oy 2.OX O C CURB 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK SECTION N -N EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS �►1 F . PROPOSED 0 I IMPROVEMENTS 06 I R/W 50' 1 56' I �- 42' 4' 1 41' I 8' 3' 1 MEDI N I 1 1 I 2.0% I PROPOSE CURB L RETAINIM -6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER -8' SIDEWALK PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK SECTION N -N PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) SECTION F -F PRIVATE STREET (PRIVATE) II k WALL 32' - 31.75' c� a 31 u FL Y8• FL 19' 2.875' `¢' FL 26' " 2.875' MIN. TRAVEL PARKING MIN. TRAVEL MIN. �X -.OX d" ROLLED C" RB 4" ROLLED 0" CURB CURB CURB SECTION G -G SECTION H -H PRIVATF STREET TYPICAL PRIVAIF DRIVE (PRIVATE) AND FlRE LANE (PRIVATE) F - PROPOSED UL IMPROVEMEMS RIA' R/w 92 R/W _ 40' 1 52. 6 1 8' 32' 44' 1 8' I I I I s " CURB &GUTTER 6" CURB & GUAER 6" CURBR�SIDGTC L8 SIOEWALK EXISTING ' WALK 6" CURB & GUTTER SECTION 0-0 SECTION 0-0 EXISTING BREA CANYON ROAD PROPOSED BREA CANYON ROAD (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) DEN.' SING NUA OF( 4 DENSITY SUMMARY NUMBER OF UNITS MULTI -FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO NUMBER AREA AREA DENSITY OF UNITS (ACRES) OF UNITS (DU/ACRE) 62 33 (DU/ACRE) 18.8 5.9 124 E I N C 7.2213 FIRE AND PLANNING LP DATE REVISION BY EMRY- PORTION O 'A'S RLC/ R/W R/W R/W R/W NORTHERLY L SOUTHERLY RICHT OF WAY TO o pp 4�� At \ AC BERM TOTAL GROSS 247,342 S.F. Sd' R/W 54' R/W R/W R/W BE DEDICATED TO THE / S 'j \ 5.7 AC. UUI 3Q, 2013 (PRIVATE) 46' R/w CITY of DIAMOND BAR / / SECTION 1-1 SECTION J -J SECTION K -K DATE Y 27.0' 27.0' 27.0' AVERAGE GROSS 5,263 S.F. 18`55-162AX 1 �22:3f' 23.8' �--''�' LO 55 � `�- �k EMER(�NCYACCESS ROAD SERVICE ACCESS ROAD PEDESTRIAWSERVICEACCESS ROAD W.O. 1 9.0' _ 36' _ 9.0'1 1 14.0' 26' 14.0' 1 d `" (PRWATE) (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) FEET Oa 7 0(- + SECTION B -B ENTRY - PORTION OF 'A"' STREET (PRIVATE) 1 3•" 209, -� URB �6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB &GUTTER- �8' SIDEWALK SECTION L -L EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) WALL 14' 1100 13' 13' 10' 4'1 2' I cuwv cltWv 2•. CURB &� -CURB & GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER GUTTER SECTION C -C SECTION D -D 'A' STREET - LOCAL STREET 'IIT - LOCAL STREET (TAPER) PARKING BOTH SIDES NO PARKING (PRIVATE) (PRIVATE) F - PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ROW I sa' sa' I f I 8' 42' 8' 4' 42' 8'1 I I I I I 2.0% I 2 09, CUR 6° CURB&GUTTER 8 810 6" CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED S' SIDEWALK 8' SIDEWALK SECTION L -L PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) SECTION E -E Ar STREET - LOCAL STREET PARKING BOTH SIDES (PRIVATE) Oc 117 / O�� / R/W @ r�PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS R/W R%W I®® I 50' 1 60" 8' 50' 50' 1 8' 35' 4' 63' 35' 4' 45' e'1 �1 3' I II 3 I MPX �. � 20% - - - 1 2.09 1'A 2.0% m m CURBT�n L PROPOSED CURB RETAINING WALL -6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK SECTION M -M SECTION M -M EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) 35' 4 35 I Mir _ `-oy 2.OX O C CURB 6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER 8' SIDEWALK SECTION N -N EXISTING DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS �►1 F . PROPOSED 0 I IMPROVEMENTS 06 I R/W 50' 1 56' I �- 42' 4' 1 41' I 8' 3' 1 MEDI N I 1 1 I 2.0% I PROPOSE CURB L RETAINIM -6" CURB & GUTTER 6" CURB & GUTTER -8' SIDEWALK PROPOSED 8' SIDEWALK SECTION N -N PROPOSED DIAMOND BAR BLVD. (PUBLIC) SECTION F -F PRIVATE STREET (PRIVATE) II k WALL 32' - 31.75' c� a 31 u FL Y8• FL 19' 2.875' `¢' FL 26' " 2.875' MIN. TRAVEL PARKING MIN. TRAVEL MIN. �X -.OX d" ROLLED C" RB 4" ROLLED 0" CURB CURB CURB SECTION G -G SECTION H -H PRIVATF STREET TYPICAL PRIVAIF DRIVE (PRIVATE) AND FlRE LANE (PRIVATE) F - PROPOSED UL IMPROVEMEMS RIA' R/w 92 R/W _ 40' 1 52. 6 1 8' 32' 44' 1 8' I I I I s " CURB &GUTTER 6" CURB & GUAER 6" CURBR�SIDGTC L8 SIOEWALK EXISTING ' WALK 6" CURB & GUTTER SECTION 0-0 SECTION 0-0 EXISTING BREA CANYON ROAD PROPOSED BREA CANYON ROAD (PUBLIC) (PUBLIC) DEN.' SING NUA OF( 4 DENSITY SUMMARY NUMBER OF UNITS MULTI -FAMILY ATTACHED CONDO NUMBER AREA AREA DENSITY OF UNITS (ACRES) OF UNITS (DU/ACRE) 62 33 (DU/ACRE) 18.8 DENSITY SUMMARY NUMBER OF UNITS SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED CONDO NUMBER AREA COVERED GUEST " (2 PER UNIT) DENSITY OF UNITS (ACRES) 94 185 (DU/ACRE) 73 5.9 124 PARKING SUMMARY - SINGLE FAMILY NUMBER OF UNITS REQUIRED PROVIDED COVERED (2 PER UNIT) GUEST (V3 PER UNIT) COVERED GUEST " (2 PER UNIT) TOTALS 47 94 32 94 185 IN(.LVUL3 UN•51Ktt1 PAKKIIV(, AINU L LiV1,51 3PA(.t5 IN UKIVEWAY PARKING SUMMARY - MULTI -FAMILY NUMBER OF UNITS REQUIRED PROVIDED COVERED (2 PER UNIT) GUEST (V3 PER UNIT) COVERED (2 PER UNIT) GUEST TOTALS 135 270 90 270 105 0 30 60 120 11 0 1/2 1 2 HUNSAKER INCH;S z PREPARED FOR.• OWNER. - LENNAR0 25 ENTERPRISE AUSO VIEJO, CA 92656 (949) 349-8100 GROSS AREA CONTOUR INTERVAL TOTAL LOTS PREPARED BY- O O i WILL O W HEIGHTS I h VES TING TEN TA T1 VE TRACT 72295 Nt F: \0718\Planning\OA-Project \TTM\071SP_TTM . dwg m 11 HUNSAKER 6c ASSOCIATES z I R V I N E I N C CL PLANNING ENGINEERING - 5URVEYINC Three Hughes IMre, CA 93618 F%: (949) SRYU759 PH: (949) 5041110 WILL O W HEIGHTS I h VES TING TEN TA T1 VE TRACT 72295 Nt F: \0718\Planning\OA-Project \TTM\071SP_TTM . dwg VINYL FENCE DETAIL TUBULAR 5TEEL FENCE DETAIL SECT101 SCALE FOOTING MASONRY WALL DETAIL MASONRY BLOCK WALL DETAIL BLOCK :IN15H "URE >VE FOOTING P05T5 PICKETS 5H \DE LEGEND MASONRY BLOCK WALL WITH PLASTER FINISH TO MATCH ARCHITECTURE — PER DETAIL «««««»»««»»»»» 6' TUBULAR STEEL FENCE VINYL PRIVACY FENCE COLOR: BEIGE 42" TUBULAR STEEL FENCE 1 I 8860 \ gy � \ 87 93 \ _ / .TRACT No. 25991 13 \ M.B. 702, PGS 16 TO 21 82 86 92 / \ 14 83 \ 85 - / V— 15 \ - \ 2 \ / / �\ \ 84 / on / 15 i 14 \\ \ 13 12 16 TRACT No. 25991 TRACT No. 33417 \ \ j ; \ rrJri�ar�\ice's '��jf i \,�\ r r r a ra r \ ` \ / / \ / d \ /1/�� -87.3i P(7 SJR rC)-6� M.B. 702, PGS 16 TO 21 M.B. 909, PGv537 TO 39 \ 4 TRACT o X2974 1 �I 7 rrL �aT 1vh `- 4) '`v O A v v1 vv 1 / �-" - �P \ \, � \I. \\ `\ M.B. 873, PGS 50 TO 56 1 1 V 18 > �� / INTEGRAL COLOR SPLIT FACE 19 BLOCK RETAINING WALL, TYP. / (SEE CIVIL PLANS) a� v , � \ o wPtle , o l COLOR: TAN � / — 0` \� 'VERDURA' PLANTED INTEi COLOR RETAINING WALL, TYP. 146 / / � / ti \\ "�� � ,.g �" \ \ — - (SEE CIVIL PLANS) / rfl r/JAh .269-691d� vv COLOR: TAN / 142 / d, \1 \ / / /r 'iES 1-5� x\ a 5 uA /FdAfN GARDEJ,,P / / �, , / i vv v /r / ,/ /PAfjK/ ASI'X/ IN / - r / XZ O� / �/ / // �I �/ / /'` r 1 I // // •r n r� /' \ / a \i\-\\ / / rrr'/ \ I \ \ ly 76 SARK / / v /')1117/ ��� 4 \ r 11 40 / \\ ti 'TRACT 27�07 39 �Q M.B. 7i,� (10 25 38 Azll� �Q ' r \ \ V A /,'(r�' 2 / ,Q29 \ 26 \ Tr -140T /\h \ \ 30 TRACT No. 3416,0 31 M.B. 900 PGS 20 TO 25 32 12 < / 33 / 34 /V i TRACT No. 25989 3 i� \ 38 \ 3 \\ M.B. 714, PGS 5 TO 7 " 14 'VERDURA' PLANTED INTEGRAL / 37 \� / O` " \. �' \ \ 15 \ \ \ COLOR RETAINING WALL, T1'P. 36 \\ / QO y \ \ \\ (SEE CIVIL PLANS) > s / COLOR: TAN �Q \ \ \ \` FEET \ 17 \ \ 0 30 60 120 \ \ 0 1/21 2 \ INCHES 18 \ PREPARED FOR. PREPARED BY.- \ OWNER: FENCE AND WALL PLAN LENNAR` 25 ENTERPRISE ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656 (949) 349-8100 DESIGN Rj M GROUP 31591 Camino Capistrano San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 www. RJ Mdesigngmup.com [9491493-2690fax 19491493-2600 uhone WILL O W HEIGHTS TEN TA T1 VE TRACT CITY COUNCIL TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: James DeStefano, City Mang" " Agenda # 8.1 Meeting Date: November 19, 2013 AGENDA REPORT TITLE: ORDINANCE NO 03(C) 2013: AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR IDENTIFYING THE TEMPORARY RE -LOCATION OF REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR TO DIAMOND BAR CITY HALL LOCATED AT 21810 COPLEY DRIVE AND AMENDING ORDINANCE NOS. 03, 03(A) and 03B (2013) RECOMMENDATION: Adopt as urgency ordinance. FISCAL. IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: On June 4, 2013, the City Council adopted Urgency Ordinance No. 03(2013) relocating the Diamond Bar City Council meetings to the Windmill Community Room, located at Diamond Bar City Hall during the months of July, August and September due to the unavailability of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Auditorium. On August 20, 2013, the City Council Adopted Ordinance No. 03(A) (2013) extending the time at which it would meet in the Windmill Room through its meeting of November 5, 2013. Then on November 5, 2013, the City Council Adopted Ordinance No. 03(B) (2013) again extending the City Council meeting through its meeting of November 19, 2013. Recently City Staff was notified that the SCAQMD Auditorium may not be available for use by the City Council on December 3, 2013. As a result, the City Council will need to amend Ordinance Nos. 03, 03(A), 03(B) (2013) to continue to hold its regularly scheduled meetings in the Windmill Community Room at Diamond Bar City Hall, located at 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA, through December 3, 2013. The dates and times of the meetings will remain the same. It is anticipated that the SCAQMD Auditorium will be available for the City Council's second meeting in December. 963913.1 DW10ND BAR CITY COUNCIL TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: James DeStefano, City Mang" " Agenda # 8.1 Meeting Date: November 19, 2013 AGENDA REPORT TITLE: ORDINANCE NO 03(C) 2013: AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR IDENTIFYING THE TEMPORARY RE -LOCATION OF REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR TO DIAMOND BAR CITY HALL LOCATED AT 21810 COPLEY DRIVE AND AMENDING ORDINANCE NOS. 03, 03(A) and 03B (2013) RECOMMENDATION: Adopt as urgency ordinance. FISCAL. IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: On June 4, 2013, the City Council adopted Urgency Ordinance No. 03(2013) relocating the Diamond Bar City Council meetings to the Windmill Community Room, located at Diamond Bar City Hall during the months of July, August and September due to the unavailability of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Auditorium. On August 20, 2013, the City Council Adopted Ordinance No. 03(A) (2013) extending the time at which it would meet in the Windmill Room through its meeting of November 5, 2013. Then on November 5, 2013, the City Council Adopted Ordinance No. 03(B) (2013) again extending the City Council meeting through its meeting of November 19, 2013. Recently City Staff was notified that the SCAQMD Auditorium may not be available for use by the City Council on December 3, 2013. As a result, the City Council will need to amend Ordinance Nos. 03, 03(A), 03(B) (2013) to continue to hold its regularly scheduled meetings in the Windmill Community Room at Diamond Bar City Hall, located at 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA, through December 3, 2013. The dates and times of the meetings will remain the same. It is anticipated that the SCAQMD Auditorium will be available for the City Council's second meeting in December. 963913.1 Government Code section 54954 requires the City Council to establish the time and place for holding regular meetings by ordinance, resolution or some other rule. The City Council has done so by ordinance. The attached Ordinance, if adopted by the City Council, will provide public notice of the relocation of City Council meetings on an interim basis. There is a need to adopt it as an urgency ordinance due to the fact that if adopted in the normal course, an ordinance requires two readings and is not effective for 30 days after the second reading. Thus, the effective date would occur well after the December 3, 2013, meeting and would be of no assistance in ensuring compliance with Government Code section 54954. Pursuant to Government Code section 36937, urgency ordinances require specified findings and approval by a 4/5 vote. The findings for the urgency are set forth in the Ordinance. Upon the conclusion of the December 3, 2013, City Council meeting this Ordinance will automatically terminate and the publicly noticed time and place of the regular meetings of the City Council will revert back to the SCAQMD Auditorium as specified in Section 2.08.10 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code. Prepred by: Tommye tribbins, City Clerk 963913.1 Reviewed by: David Doyle, Asst. City Manager ORDINANCE NO. 03(C) (2013) AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR IDENTIFYING THE TEMPORARY RE -LOCATION OF REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR TO DIAMOND BAR CITY HALL LOCATED AT 21810 COPLEY DRIVE AND AMENDING ORDINANCE NOS. 03, 03A AND 03B (2013) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY FINDS AND DETERMINES AS FOLLOWS: 1. Government Code section 54954 of the Brown Act requires the City Council to establish the time and place for holding regular meetings by ordinance, resolution, bylaws, or some other rule. 2. The City has established the time and place for holding regular City Council meetings by ordinance. 3. It has come to the City's attention that the place established for the holding of regular meetings will be unavailable due to remodeling. 4. Pursuant to Government Code section 36934 an ordinance can become effective immediately upon introduction, provided that the City Council makes findings to support the urgency in accordance with Government Code section 36937 and passes the Ordinance by a four-fifths vote. Now, therefore, the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar does ordain as follows: Section 1. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 4A (1989), Section 2.08.010 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code, regularly scheduled meetings of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar are held at 21865 Copley Drive, commonly known as the SCAQMD Auditorium. Section 2. Due to the unavailability of the SCAQMD Auditorium due to remodeling, on June 3, 2013 the City Council adopted Urgency Ordinance No. 03 (2013) and on August 20, 2013, Ordinance No. 03(A) and on November 5, 2013, Ordinance No. 03(B), relocating its City Council meetings for July 2, 2013, through November 19, 2013, to the Windmill Community Room, Diamond Bar City Hall, located at 21810 Copley Drive. Section 3. City staff was recently notified that the SCAQMD Auditorium may continue to be unavailable for the City Council meeting scheduled for December 3, 2013, and therefore, there is a need to continue to hold City Council meetings in the Windmill Community Room. 967196.1 Section 4. If this Ordinance is not adopted as an urgency ordinance, pursuant to Government Code section 36934 the Ordinance would not become effective until January 2, 2014, as such the City Council would not be able to comply with the Brown Act requirement that the time and place for holding regular meetings be established by ordinance. As such, this Ordinance needs to be adopted as an urgency ordinance in order for the City Council to meet at its regularly scheduled meeting and conduct the official business of the City in compliance with state law. Section 5. At the conclusion of the City Council meeting of December 3, 2013, or in the event that the SCAQMD Auditorium becomes available for the meeting of December 3, 2013, this Ordinance shall, by its own terms terminate and no longer be of any force and effect and the location of the City Council meetings will be governed by Section 2.08.010 of the Diamond Bar Municipal Code. Section 6. Therefore, the City Council amends Ordinance Nos. 03, 03(A) and 03(B) (2013) adding the date of December 3, 2013, to the dates that City Council meetings will be held in the Windmill Community Room. Section 7. The Mayor shall sign this ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be posted within fifteen (15) days after its passage in at least (3) public locations in the City of Diamond Bar pursuant to Resolution No. 89-6(A). Section 8. Since this Ordinance is effective only on an interim basis, it shall not be codified in the Diamond Bar Municipal Code. Jack Tanaka, Mayor I, Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on the day of 2013 and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar held on day of 2013, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Tommye A. Cribbins, City Clerk 967196.1 VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK FROM: DATE: 3 ADDRESS: PHONE: ORGANIZATION: AGENDA#/SUBJECT: U I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda/subject item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. /I Signature This document is a public record subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act. a N VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK ,) - FROM: �Id� f.,f tS� ` DATE: ADDRESS: O`2073�j u�(y1c,�r PHONE: C(OQ SIC(- 00%5 ORGANIZATION: AGENDA#/SUBJECT: I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda/subject item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. Signature This document is a public record subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act. slsa" VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: FROM: ADDRESS: ORGANIZATION: AGENDA#/SUBJECT: CITY CLERK DATE: j PHONE: I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda/subject item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. Signature This document is a public record subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act. VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK FROM: t%tye-a_m Clto DATE: 0 ADDRESS: -_095-t1 bio\MOAd Sar B(M- ©t5 PHONE: 3Q� al3g- 9t 93 ORGANIZATION: [c) Cc -so Yo u•Fh Orgy -h es-bt-A AGENDA#/SUBJECT: GWIP al __(Y&ftyL�z+iOn I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda/subject item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. Jy nature This document is a public record subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act. VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: FROM: ADDRESS: ORGANIZATION: CITY CLERK YfrVD S�GY,'�1� DATE: a PHONE: 2 F4.SZ C PWi tc; s° P '' to , bf 644 C,4 (p AGENDA#/SUBJECT: `:f 5,''1TE, /—� rIt3l' rre1,���) l t expect to address the Council on the subject agenda/subject item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. Vm ✓t Signg1u- --' This document is a public record subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act. VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK FROM:l`%dt. Ctt� 1G2LI DATE: ADDRESS:.t!t �11Gtrt JiC(clb,l-1S PHONE: 4 u /%% LI1Z3 ORGANIZATION: AGENDA#/SUBJECT: 0-0 '=\'y I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda/subject item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. Signature This document is a public record subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act. VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK FROM: t i r= ` DATE: ADDRESS:.� ,r _ e� PHONE: ORGANIZATION: 44-c AGENDA#/SUBJECT: -,Z—: ;, t �- I expect to address the,Council on the subject agenda/subject item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. Signature This document is a public record subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act. VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK �i"� FROM: 'Susoal �C r pr©�cq� DATE: i f/0/13 ADDRESS: 35gO C6D®ked CrCeV- Dr.PHONE: 90 57(f (5`-() ORGANIZATION: 1T25 c4 -A.+ AGENDA#/SUBJECT: r `� I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda/subject item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. Signature This document is a public record subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act. VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL 4) TO: CITY CLERK I l 1 FROM: ✓ �_ j> t� hA C�II�S�i DATE: `` t ADDRESS: t C� , PHONE: ORGANIZATION: AGENDA#/SUBJECT; I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda/subject item. Please ha tithe Co cil Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. r , Signature This document is a public record subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act, CIT I In I I Illm , tvwre. nF." hjg9 VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL TO: CITY CLERK C Pa�ca»-L-,) FROM: CSF SwV H. DATE: �,1�ttr3 ADDRESS: 27 Cv4oy rr �eSd2.3oo PHONE: `tg 3_ 4L _Y��J CA 42a51e ORGANIZATION: L9`yt�r }yrs AGENDA#/SUBJECT: P L ;zo 13 - I expect to address the Council on the subject agenda/subject item. Please have the Council Minutes reflect my name and address as written above. Signature This document is a public record subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act.