HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/20/2012City Council Agenda
Tuesday, March 20, 2012
6:30 p.m. — Regular Meeting
The Government Center
South Coast Air Quality Management Districtl
Main Auditorium
21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765
Ling -Ling Chang Jack Tanaka
Mayor Mayor Pro Tem
Ron Everett Carol Herrera Steve Tye
Council Member Council Member Council Member
City Manager James DeStefano • City Attorney Michael Jenkins City Clerk Tommye Cribbins
Copies of staff reports or other written documentation relating to agenda items are on file in the Office of the City Clerk, and are available for public
inspection. If you have questions regarding an agenda item, please contact the City Clerk at (909) 839-7010 during regular business hours.
In an effort to comply with the requirements of Title H of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the City of Diamond Bar requires that any person in
need of any type of special equipment, assistance or accommodation (s) in order to communicate at a City public meeting, must inform the City Clerk a
minimum of 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting.
Have online access? City Council Agendas are now available on the City of Diamond Bar's web site at www.CityofDiamondBar.com
Please refrain from smoking, eating or drinking in the Council Chambers. The City of Diamond Bar uses recycled paper and encourages you to do the same.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
March 20, 2012
CALL TO ORDER:
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
INVOCATION:
ROLL CALL:
APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
Next Resolution No. 2012-13
Next Ordinance No. 04(2012)
6:30 p.m.
Mayor
Pastor Randy Lanthripe,
Church in the Valley
Council Members Everett, Herrera, Tye,
Mayor Pro Tem Tanaka, Mayor Chang
Mayor
1. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATES, PROCLAMATIONS:
1.1 Presentation of City Tile to Deputy Mark St. Amant upon his Retirement
from the Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department.
NEW BUSINESS OF THE MONTH:
1.2 Presentation of Certificate Plaque to Boba ni Taco, 1220 S. Diamond Bar
Blvd., #C as New Business of the Month, March, 2012.
2. CITY MANAGER REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
Written materials distributed to the City Council within 72 hours of the City Council
meeting are available for public inspection immediately upon distribution in the City
Clerk's Office at 21810 Copley Dr., Diamond Bar, California, during normal business
hours.
March 20, 2012 PAGE 2
3. PUBLIC COMMENTS: "Public Comments" is the time reserved on each
regular meeting agenda to provide an opportunity for members of the public to
directly address the Council on Consent Calendar items or matters of interest to
the public that are not already scheduled for consideration on this agenda.
Although the City Council values your comments, pursuant to the Brown Act, the
Council generally cannot take any action on items not listed on the posted
agenda. Please complete a Speaker's Card and give it to the City Clerk
(completion of this form is voluntary). There is a five-minute maximum time limit
when addressing the City Council.
4. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC COMMENT: Under the Brown Act, members of the
City Council may briefly respond to public comments but no extended discussion
and no action on such matters may take place.
5. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS:
5.1 State of the City — March 22, 2012- 6:30 — 7:30 p.m., Diamond Bar Center,
1600 Grand Avenue.
5.2 Planning Commission Meeting — March 27, 2012 — 7:00 p.m., Windmill
Room — City Hall, 21810 Copley Drive.
5.3 Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting — March 29, 2012 — Windmill
Room, City Hall, 21810 Copley Drive.
5.4 City Council Meeting — April 3, 2012 — 6:30 p.m., AQMD/Government
Center, Auditorium, 21865 Copley Drive.
6. CONSENT CALENDAR:
6.1 City Council Minutes — Regular Meeting of March 6, 2012 — Approve as
submitted.
6.2 Ratification of Check Register— March 1, 2012 through March 14, 2012
totaling $1,084,262.57.
Requested by: Finance Department
6.3 Adopt Resolution No. 2012 -XX: Establishing an Approved Vendor
List as Defined by Ordinance No. 05(2006) to be in Effect from
February 1, 2012 Until January 31, 2013
Recommended Action: Adopt.
Requested by: Finance Department
March 20, 2012 PAGE 3
6.4 Authorization for Purchase of Electronic Equipment and Other
Devices for the Diamond Bar Library in an Amount Not—to-Exceed
$150,000 and Appropriate the Necessary Funds from General Fund
Reserves.
Recommended Action: Authorize.
Requested by: City Manager
6.5 Authorize Increase to Contract with Woodcliff Construction in an
Amount Not -to -Exceed $150,000 for a Total Authorization of
$6,218,616 for Construction of City Hall and Library.
Recommended Action: Approve.
Requested by: City Manager
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None.
8. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION:
8.1 Adopt Resolution No. 2012 -XX: Adopting Negative Declaration No.
PL 2012-087 for Construction of a Dog Park on 1.35 Acres of
Unimproved Land within Parntera Park, 738 Pantera Drive.
Recommended Action: Adopt.
Requested by: Community Development Department
9. COUNCIL SUB -COMMITTEE REPORTS/COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS:
10. ADJOURNMENT:
Agenda No. 6.1
MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
MARCH 6, 2012
CLOSED SESSION: 6:00 p.m., Room CC -8, South Coast Air Quality
Management District, 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California 91765
Public Comments on Closed Session Agenda — None Offered.
► Government Code Section 54956.9(a) Pending Litigation
City of Alhambra et al v. State of California Board of Equalization, Los Angeles
Superior Court: Case No. BS 124978 (sales tax allocation dispute).
Closed Session adjourned at approximately 6:20 p.m
CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Ling -Ling Chang called the Regular City
Council meeting to order at 6:32 p.m. in the SCAQMD/Government Center Auditorium,
21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA.
CA/Jenkins reported that tonight's Closed Session was called to order at 6:00 p.m. No
public comments on the closed session agenda were offered. There was one item on
the agenda that pertained to a lawsuit filed by the City of Pomona against the Board of
Equalization that ultimately involved all of the other cities in the County of Los Angeles
that collect sales taxes. The issue had to do with a re -allocation of sales taxes that
were derived from a transaction made from a warehouse in the City of Pomona. The
City Council considered and approved a settlement in the case.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Council Member Ron Everett led the Pledge of
Allegiance.
INVOCATION: Pastor Jeanne Favreau-Sorvillo, Diamond Bar United
Church of Christ gave the invocation.
ROLL CALL: Council Members Ron Everett, Carol Herrera, Steve
Tye, Mayor Pro Tem Jack Tanaka, and Mayor Ling -Ling Chang.
Staff Present: James DeStefano, City Manager; Michael Jenkins,
City Attorney; Ken Desforges, IS Director; David Liu, Public Works Director; Bob Rose,
Community Services Director; Dianna Honeywell, Finance Director; Greg Gubman,
Community Development Director; Ryan McLean, Assistant to the City Manager; Rick
Yee, Senior Civil Engineer; Kimberly Young, Associate Engineer; Anthony Santos,
Senior. Management Analyst; Lauren Hidalgo, Public Information Specialist, and
Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA: As Submitted.
1. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATES, PROCLAMATIONS:
MARCH 6, 2012 PAGE 2 CITY COUNCIL
BUSINESS OF THE MONTH:
1.1 M/Chang presented a City Tile to Jose Largaespada, new owner of
D'Antonio's Ristorante, 808 N. Diamond Bar Boulevard, as Business of
the Month for March 2012.
2. CITY MANAGER REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: None
3. PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Jesse Lanz, Diamond Bar Library Manager, announced upcoming events during
the month of March including a recycled paper wreaths exhibit March 12 through
March 31; and an anti -bullying and anti -cyber bullying workshop for tweens and
teens including a presentation for parents at 7:00 p.m. on Wednesday, March 14.
Vinod Kashap, 21452 Chirping Sparrow Road appealed to Council not to
approve Site D for high-density housing and stated that he and other residents
would take the matter to another level if approved.
4. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC COMMENTS:
CM/DeStefano reiterated that the Council had held numerous public hearings
over the past couple of years with respect to Site D. All meetings were public
and properly noticed and throughout the course of the discussions, there was a
lot of active participation by residents surrounding the site. In addition, there was
a lot of news about the project including a % day session hosted by WVUSD near
the property to solicit more public input. At the last meeting the City Council took
action to adopt Resolutions and approve first reading of ordinances regarding the
General Plan, Specific Plan, Zone Change, Development Agreement and
Environmental Impact Report. Tonight Council is being asked to approve for
second reading those ordinances. All the meetings including the last City
Council meeting were properly processed and published in accordance with
California State Law for such actions the Council was asked to take as well as,
DB's more extensive Municipal Code Regulations called out for postings, etc.
CM/DeStefano went on to respond to the comment made regarding the City
spending money on the project on behalf of the school district. He stated that it
is a true statement on its face; the City has fronted the cost for this project,
specifically, the Environmental Impact Report, on behalf of the school district.
The City and School District entered into a Memorandum of Understanding that
has been revised and reviewed by the public over the past couple of years.
Contained within the MOU, the school district will be reimbursing the City for the
entirety of its expenditures upon the sale of the property; all of the City's costs
associated with the processing of the project. The City is not spending millions of
dollars on this project and again, the City will be reimbursed in total
approximately $500,000.
MARCH 6, 2012 PAGE 3 CITY COUNCIL
5. SCHEDULE OF FUTURE EVENTS:
5.1 Traffic and Transportation Commission Meeting — March 8, 2012 — 7:00
p.m., Diamond Bar City Hall Windmill Community Room, 21810 Copley
Drive.
5.2 Planning Commission Meeting — March 13, 2012 — 7:00 p.m. — Diamond
Bar City Hall Windmill Community Room, 21810 Copley Drive.
5.3 City Council Meeting — March 20, 2012 — 6:30 p.m.,
SCAQMD/Government Center Auditorium, 21865 Copley Drive.
5.4 State of the City Address — March 22, 2012 from 6:30 to 7:30 p.m.,
Diamond Bar Center, 1600 Grand Avenue.
6. CONSENT CALENDAR: C/Herrera moved, MPT/Tanaka seconded, to approve
the Consent Calendar with the exception of Item 6.9 pulled by M/Chang. Motion
carried by the following Roll Call:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Everett, Herrera, Tye, MPT/Tanaka,
M/Chang
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
6.1. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — Regular Meeting of February 21, 2012 -
Approved as amended.
6.2 PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES — Regular Meeting
of November 17, 2011 — Received and Filed.
6.3 TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MINUTES:
(a) Regular Meeting of November 10, 2011 — Receive and Filed.
(b) Regular Meeting of January 12, 2012 — Received and Filed.
6.4 RATIFIED CHECK REGISTER Dated February 16, 2012 through
February 29, 2012 totaling $1,398,523.73.
6.5 APPROVED TREASURER'S STATEMENT — Month of January 2012.
6.6 (a) APPROVED CONTRACT AMENDMENT WITH GFB-FRIEDRICH
& ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR ASSESSMENT ENGINEERING SERVICES
FOR LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NUMBERS 38, 39 AND
41 FOR A PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR, FOR A TOTAL CONTRACT
AMOUNT OF $12,965.
MARCH 6. 2012 PAGE 4
CITY COUNCIL
(b) ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2012-10: ORDERING THE CITY
ENGINEER TO PREPARE AND FILE A REPORT RELATED TO
MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS IN THE CITY
LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 38 AND ANY
ASSESSMENT THEREON FOR FY 2012-13.
(c) ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2012-11: ORDERING THE CITY
ENGINEER TO PREPARE AND FILE A REPORT RELATED TO
MAINTENANCE OF OPEN SPACE IN THE CITY LANDSCAPING
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 39 AND ANY ASSESSMENT THEREON
FOR FY 2012-13.
(d) ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2012-12: ORDERING THE CITY
ENGINEER TO PREPARE AND FILE A REPORT RELATED TO
MAINTENANCE OF OPEN SPACE IN THE CITY LANDSCAPING
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 41 AND ANY ASSESSMENT THEREON
FOR FY 2012-13.
6.7 AUTHORIZED AN INCREASE TO THE CONTRACT WITH COMDYN
GROUP, INC. FOR AS -NEEDED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
SERVICES IN THE AMOUNT OF $12,000 FOR A TOTAL
AUTHORIZATION OF $47,500.
6.8 APPROVED AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE CONTRACT WITH WEST
COAST ARBORISTS FOR CITYWIDE TREE MAINTENANCE AND
WATERING SERVICES FOR 2011-12 FISCAL YEAR ADDING $30,000
TO THE AUTHORIZED AMOUNT OF $181,700 RESULTING IN A TOTAL
NOT -TO -EXCEED AMOUNT OF $211,700.
MATTERS WITHDRAWN FROM CONSENT CALENDAR:
6.9 SECOND READING OF SITE D ORDINANCES:
(a) ORDINANCE NO. 01(2012) APPROVING ZONE CHANGE NO.
2007-04 CHANGING EXISTING ZONING TO SPECIFIC PLAN (SP) FOR
PROPERTY COMPRISED OF APPROXIMATELY 30.36 ACRES
LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BREA CANYON ROAD
AND DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD (ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS
8714-002-900, 8714-002-901, 8714-002-902, 8714-002-903 AND 8714-
015-001).
(b) ORDINANCE NO. 02(2012): APPROVING THE SITE D SPECIFIC
PLAN (SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2007-01) FOR PROPERTY COMPRISED
OF APPROXIMATELY 30.36 ACRES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF BREA CANYON ROAD AND DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD
(ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 8714-002-900, 8714-002-901, 8714-
002-902, 8714-002-903 AND 8714-015-001).
MARCH 6, 2012 PAGE 5 CITY COUNCIL
(c) ORDINANCE NO. 03(2012): APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT NO. 2012-01 FOR PROPERTY COMPRISED OF
APPROXIMATELY 30.36 ACRES, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF BREA CANYON ROAD AND DIAMOND BAR BOULEVARD
(ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 8714-002-900, 8714-002-901, 8714-
002-902, 8714-002-903 AND 8714-015-001).
M/Chang said she wanted to be consistent with her previous votes on this
matter.
C/Herrera stated that this auditorium was filled with about 200 individuals
who were opposed to commercial and who were opposed to high density
apartments of over 200 units. This Council listened to the residents that
were present and the action that the Council is taking this evening reflects
that concern, that it will be a project with no commercial and 200 units.
C/Herrera moved, C/Everett seconded, to approve Second Reading of
Site D Ordinances 01(2012), 02(2012) and 03(2012). Motion carried by
the following Roll call:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
PUBLIC HEARING:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS
COUNCIL MEMBERS
None
8. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: None
Everett, Herrera, Tye,
MPT/Tanaka
M/Chang
None
9. COUNCIL SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS/COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS:
C/Everett thanked the Regional Chamber of Commerce for the Joint Mayor's
Prayer Breakfast on Wednesday, February 29 and announced that the Vietnam
Veterans Dignity Memorial will return to the Whittier location March 23-30. He
attended the Ribbon Cutting Ceremony for the Kumon Learning Center, 2757
Diamond Bar Boulevard (Super H -Mart Center); participated in Read Across
America on March 2 and attended the Diamond Bar Community Foundation's
Spotlight on the Arts event last Saturday at Mt. SAC. C/Everett also participated
in the 1 K Walnut Valley Walk/Run and congratulated high school student James
William McCreary who won his third 5K run in just over 16 minutes.
C/Herrera stated that DB is now famous as being one of the cities through which
the ginormous rock traveled! After looking at the photos she does not
understand how the carrier was able to turn corners. She hoped that everyone.
would support the Miss Diamond Bar candidates and to all who are Irish or would
like to be she wished all a Happy St. Patrick's Day.
MARCH 6, 2012 PAGE 6 CITY COUNCIL
C/Tye spoke about the outstanding Spotlight on the Arts event he attended. The
Diamond Bar Community Foundation does a tremendous job. He said he would
like to see everyone attend the 5th annual event next year so that there was
standing room only. WVUSD Educational Foundation 5K Walk/Run was held on
Sunday and he appreciated that some took the challenge. C/Tye asked that
tonight's meeting be adjourned in honor of Mitch Childs, a local resident, teacher,
coach and friend who passed away.
MPT/Tanaka attended the PUSD meeting a couple of weeks ago and that sadly
they adopted a resolution to issue layoff notices mandated by the State to be
done in March prior to the school year ending. Ninety plus individuals were
affected. He attended the Joint Mayor's Prayer Breakfast and Pack 737's Blue
and Gold Awards Dinner at Evergreen Elementary School. A couple of weeks
ago he attended the League of California Cities LA County Division's dinner
meeting to hear a presentation on Legislation 101. Last Friday he attended the
memorial service for Chief Joe Romero, Pomona Police Chief who passed away
due to medical complications. On Saturday he attended the DB Pony Baseball
opening day ceremony. MPT/Tanaka stated that he participated in the WVUSD
5K Run/Walk and thanked all the track students and Leo Club members for
helping to set up for the event on both days. He congratulated Chaparral Middle
School which boasted 700 participants and won the Spirit trophy. He attended
the Miss Diamond Bar Car Wash and on Sunday attended the Eagle Scout Court
of Honor for DBHS student James Powell from Troop 220. He reminded
everyone that the Miss Diamond Bar Pageant will be held on Sunday, March 18
at the DBHS Theater.
M/Chang said she would keep her comments short because she was rushing to
catch a red-eye flight to Washington D.C. to lobby for the 57/60 confluence
project. She congratulated the Diamond Bar Community Foundation on the
excellent Spotlight on the Arts event and thanked the Sheriffs Department for
doing such an excellent job at the WVUSD 5K Run/Walk. She further stated that
she too had participated in the Read Across America at Armstrong, Diamond
Point and Golden Springs Elementary Schools and planted a tree in honor of the
Lorax at Diamond Point.
ADJOURNMENT:. With no further business to conduct, M/Chang adjourned the
Regular City Council Meeting at 7:20 p.m. in memory of Mitch Childs.
TOMMYE CRIBBINS, CITY CLERK
The foregoing minutes are hereby approved this day of 2012.
LING -LING CHANG, MAYOR
CITY COUNCIL
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Agenda # 6. 2
Meeting Date: March 20, 2012
AGENDA REPORT
FROM: James DeStefano, City Mana e
TITLE: Ratification of Check Register date March 01, 2012 through March 14,
2012 totaling $ 1,084,262.57.
RECOMMENDATION:
Ratify.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Expenditure of $ 1,084,262.57 in City funds.
BACKGROUND:
The City has established the policy of issuing accounts payable checks on a weekly
basis with City Council ratification at the next scheduled City Council meeting.
DISCUSSION:
The attached check register containing checks dated March 01, 2012 through March 14,
2012 for $ 1,084,262.57 is being presented for ratification. All payments have been
made in compliance with the City's purchasing policies and procedures. Payments
have been reviewed and approved by the appropriate departmental staff and the
attached Affidavit affirms that the check register has been audited and deemed accurate
by the Finance Director.
PREPARED BY:
Luisa Fua
Accounting Technician
REVIEWED BY:
Finance Director
Attachments: Affidavit and Check Register— 03/01/12 through 03/14/12.
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR
CHECK REGISTER AFFIDAVIT
The attached listings of demands, invoices, and claims in the form of a check register
including checks dated March 01, 2012 through March 14, 2012 has been audited and
is certified as accurate. Payments have been allowed from the following funds in these
amounts:
Description
General Fund
Prop A - Transit Fund
Prop C - Transit Tax Fund
Integrated Waste Mgt Fund
A82766 - Air City Mgt Fund
Com Dev Block Grand Fund
LLAD 38 Fund
LLAD 39 Fund
LLAD 41 Fund
Capital Imp Projects Fund
PFA - Debt Service Fund
Computer Eq Repl Fund
Signed:
( .
Dianna Honeywell
Finance Director
Amount
$673,848.91
$7,547.77
$47,823.75
$11,513.61
$3,720.00
$1,941.08
$11,740.76
$11,610.95
$4,143.87
$172,011.06
$137,219.66
$1,141.15
$1,084,262.57
City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 03/01/2012 thru 03/14/2012
Check Date
Check Number
Vendor Name
Transaction Description
Fund/ Dept
Acct#
Amount
Total Check Amount
3/1/2012
12 -PP 05
PAYROLL TRANSFER
P/R TRANSFER-12/PP 05
001
10200
165,447.36
$179,094.12
3/1/2012
98164
PAYROLLTRANSFER
P/R TRANSFER-12/PP 05
112
10200
5,796.42
$6,752.40
3/1/2012
PAYROLLTRANSFER
P/R TRANSFER-12/PP 05
113
10200
5,910.25
3/1/2012
98165
PAYROLLTRANSFER
P/R TRANSFER-12/PP 05
115
10200
1,940.09
$350.00
3/1/2012
98163
IHENRY MELENDEZ
FACILITY REFUND -DBC
001
1 23002 1
550.00
$550.00
3/1/2012
JAMERITECH BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC
COPIER NIAINT-JAN/FEB
0014090
1 42100
1 768.44
3/1/2012
98164
JALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES
CROSSING GUARD-JAN/FEB
0014411
45410
6,752.401
$6,752.40
3/1/2012
98165
GEORGEALVAREZ
1FACLITY REFUND -DBC
001
23002
350.001
$350.00
3/1/2012
98166
JAMERICAN ZEN ASSOCIATION
FACILITY REFUND -HERITAGE
001
23002
200.00
$200.00
3/1/2012
98167
AMERICOMP GROUP INC
SUPPLIES -PRINTER TONERS
0014070
41200
1,785.42
$1,785.42
3/1/2012
98168
AMERITECH BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC
COMP EQ -HARDWARE
530407046230
42410
619.56
$1,388.00
3/1/2012
JAMERITECH BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC
COPIER NIAINT-JAN/FEB
0014090
1 42100
1 768.44
3/1/2012
98169
ERICANDRADA
FACILITY REFUND -DBC
00123002
42410
350.00
$267.50
3/1/2012
JERICANDRADA
FACILITY CHRGS-DBC
001736615
36615
-82.50
3/1/2012
98170
ANGELS BASEBALL
EXCURSION -DAY CAMP
0015350
42410
1,380.00
$1,380.00
3/1/2012
NOMAAN BAIG
FACIILTY CHRGS-DBC
001
36615
-110.00
3/1/2012
98171
ARCHITXTURE
CHAIRS -CITY HALL
0014093
46220
3,000.89
$3,000.89
3/1/2012
98172
AIDAARGUETA
FACILITY REFUND -DBC
001
36615
870.00
$870.00
3/1/2012
98173
AT&T MOBILITY
CELL CHRGS-CMGR
00140301
42125 1
52.95
$52.95
3/1/2012
98174
NOMAAN BAIG
FACILITY REFUND -DBC
00123002
1 42210 1
500.00
$390.00
3/1/2012
NOMAAN BAIG
FACIILTY CHRGS-DBC
001
36615
-110.00
3/1/2012
98175
BEAR STATE AIR CONDITIONING SVCS IN
BLDG MAINT-CITY HALL
1 0014093
1 42210 1
635:331
$635.33
3/1/2012
98176
BENESYST
3/2/12-P/RDEDUCTIONS
001
1 21105 1
741.671
$741.67
3/1/2012
98177
IBEST LIGHTING PRODUCTS
SUPPLIES -DBC
0015333
1 42210 1
245.95
$1,354.40
Page 1
City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 03/01/2012 thru 03/14/2012
Check Date
Check Number
Vendor Name
Transaction Description
Fund/ Dept
Acct #
Amount
Total CheckAmount
3/1/2012
98177...
BEST LIGHTING PRODUCTS
SUPPLIES -PARKS
0015340
42210
301.96
$1,354.40...
3/1/2012
98179
BEST LIGHTING PRODUCTS
SUPPLIES -PARKS
0015340
41200
571.38
$47.30
3/1/2012
BEST LIGHTING PRODUCTS
SUPPLIES -PARKS
0015340
42210
235.11
3/1/2012
98178
CA PUBLIC EMPL RETIREMENT SYSTEM
ADDL SRVIVR BENEFT-11/12
F 001
21109
2,527.20
$2,527.20
3/1/2012
1
CDW GOVERNMENT
COMP EQ -HARDWARE
5304070
1 46230
1 464.81
3/1/2012 1
98179
CALIFORNIA COMMERCIAL LIGHTING SPPL
SUPPLIES -DBC
1 0015333
41200
47.30
$47.30
3/1/2012 1
98180
CAROLA HERRERA
PER DIEM -WASHINGTON D.C.
0014010
42330
210.00
$210.00
3/1/2012
98181
CDW GOVERNMENT
COMP EQ -HARDWARE
5304070
46230
1 56.78
$521.59
3/1/2012
1
CDW GOVERNMENT
COMP EQ -HARDWARE
5304070
1 46230
1 464.81
3/1/2012
98182
YING CHANG
FACILITY REFUND -DBC
1 001
36615
400.00
$400.00
3/1/2012
1
DAVID VOLZ DESIGN
DESIGN SVCS -WASHINGTON PK
2505310
R46415
345.78
3/1/2012 1
98183
TIFFANYCHIN
RECREATION REFUND
1 001
34780
47.00
$47.00
3/1/2012
98184
FRANK CHU
IFACILITY REFUND -DBC
001
23002
100.00
$100.00
3/1/2012
98185
ISOOJIN CHU
RECREATION REFUND
001
34740
79.001
$79.00
3/1/2012
98186
CITY OF WEST COVINA
FORENSIC SVCS-JUL-SEPT 11
0014411
45401 1
1,210.00
$1,210.00
3/1/2012 1
98187
ILYNN COLLADO
FACILITY REFUND-PANTEF
001
23002
100.00
$100.00
3/1/2012 1
98188
CONSTANCE J. LILLIE
CONTRACT CLASS-WINTE
1 45320 1
526.20
$526.20
3/1/2012 1
98189
CREATOR'S TOUCH
CONTRACT CLASS -WINTER
1 0015350
1 45320
96.00
$96.00
3/1/2012
98190
CSI FULLMER
CONF CHAIRS -CITY HALL
1 0014093
1 46220
706.881
$706.88
3/1/2012
98191
DAVID VOLZ DESIGN
DESIGN SVCS -WASHINGTON PK
2505310
R46415
1,250.22
$1,596.00
3/1/2012
1
DAVID VOLZ DESIGN
DESIGN SVCS -WASHINGTON PK
2505310
R46415
345.78
3/1/2012 1
98192
CAROL DENNIS
PROF.SVCS-CCNCL MTG 2/21
1 0014030
1 44000 1
275.001
$275.00
3/1/2012 1
98193
IDEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
TRFFC SGNL MAINT-OCT-DEC
1 0015554
1 45507 1
2,758.561
$2,758.56
Page 2
City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 03/01/2012 thru 03/14/2012
Check Number Vendor Name I Transaction Description I Fund/ Dept I Acct # I Amount I Total Check Amount
3/1/2012
98194
DIAMOND BAR HAND CAR WASH
CAR WASH -POOL VEH
0014090
42200
173.85
$280.82
3/1/2012
DIAMOND BAR HAND CAR WASH
CAR WASH-NGHBRHD IMP
0015230
42200
10.99
3/1/2012
98199
DIAMOND BAR HAND CAR WASH
CAR WASH -RD MAINT
0015554
42200
70.00
$336.00
3/1/2012
DIAMOND BAR HAND CAR WASH
CAR WASH -COMM SVCS
0015310
42200
25.98
3/1/2012 1 98195 DISCOUNT ROOTER CO MAINT SVCS -CITY HALL 1 0014093 1 42210 1 110.00 $110.00
3/1/2012
98196
DIVERSIFIED TRANSPORTATION INC
DIAMOND RIDE -JAN 2012
1135553
1 45529
41,672.50
$41,913.50
3/1/2012
DIVERSIFIED TRANSPORTATION INC
HOLIDAY RIDE -JAN 2012
1135553
45529
241.00
3/1/2012
98197
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
LANDSCAPE MAINT-DIST 38
1385538
45500
11,718.00
$27,472.82
3/1/2012
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
LANDSCAPE MAINT-DIST 39
1395539
45500
11,610.95
3/1/2012
98199
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
LANDSCAPE MAINT-DIST 41
1415541
45500
4,143.87
$336.00
3/1/2012 1
98198
IFEDEX
EXPRESS MAIL -GENERAL
0014090
45310
3.461
$20.46
3/1/2012
INLAND EMPIRE STAGES
TRANS -SR EXCURSION
1125350
45310
1
853.75
3/1/2012
98199
JEFFREY HIROSE
CONTRACT CLASS -WINTER
0015350
45320
336.00
$336.00
3/1/2012
98200
1 KATE HWAN
RECREATION REFUND
001
1 34780 1
59.00
$59.00
3/1/2012
98201
INLAND EMPIRE STAGES
EXCURSION -RACETRACK
0015350
1
45310
945.00
$1,798.75
3/1/2012
INLAND EMPIRE STAGES
TRANS -SR EXCURSION
1125350
45310
1
853.75
3/1/2012
98202
INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN
LEGALAD-SITED
0014030
42115
495.00
$495.00
3/1/2012
LOWE'S BUSINESSACCOUNT
SUPPLIES -DBC
0015333
41200
228.09
3/1/2012
98203
INTERIOR OFFICE SOLUTIONS
EQ -CITY HALL
0014093
46220
713.62
$713.62
3/1/2012
98204
KOA CORPORATION
TRFFC MNGMNT SVCS -JAN 12
1185098
44030
3,720.00
$3,720.00
3/1/2012 1
98205
LA HABRA FENCE CO INC
MAINT-PAUL C GROW
1 0015340
42210 1
13.23
$13.23
3/1/2012 1
98206
1PAUL LAM
RECREATION REFUND
1 001
34780 1
67.00
$67.00
3/1/2012
98207
LOWE'S BUSINESSACCOUNT
SUPPLIES -DBC
0015333
41200
26.57
$179.43
3/1/2012
LOWE'S BUSINESSACCOUNT
SUPPLIES -DBC
0015333
41200
228.09
3/1/2012
LOWE'S BUSINESSACCOUNT
MEMO CREDIT -DBC
0015333
41200
-75.23
Page 3
City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 03/01/2012 thru 03/14/2012
Check Date I Check Number) Vendor Name
Fund/ Dept I Acct# I Amount
3/1/2012
98208
MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK
MAR 2012 -EAP PREMIUMS
001
21115
157.30
$157.30
3/1/2012
1
PERS RETIREMENT FUND
RETIRE CONTRIB-EE
001
21109
11,389.96
3/1/2012
98209
JULI MELENDEZ
FACILITY REFUND -HERITAGE
001
1 23002
200.00 1$200.00
$350.00
3/1/2012
98210
INUMARA SOFTWARE INC
ICOMP MAINT-I.T.
1 0014070
1 42205
2,i30.001
$2,230.00
3/1/2012
98211
PERS RETIREMENT FUND
SURVIVOR BENEFIT
001
21109
46.50
$11,436.46
3/1/2012
1
PERS RETIREMENT FUND
RETIRE CONTRIB-EE
001
21109
11,389.96
3/1/2012
98212
RANCHO PACIFIC ENGINEERING
RETENTIONS PAYABLE
250
20300
-18,886.62
$189,979.56
3/1/2012
1
RANCHO PACIFIC ENGINEERING
CONSTRUCTION -MINI PARK
2505310
46415
188,866.18
3/1/2012 1 98213 IREGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ISERVICE CONTRACT -DEC 11 10014096 1 45000 1 1,000.001 $1,000.00
3/1/2012
98214
REPUBLIC ITS INC
MAINT-TRFFC SIGNAL JAN
0015554
45507
4,102.00
$8,598.33
3/1/2012
1
REPUBLIC ITS INC
MAINT-TRFFC SIGNAL JAN
0015554
45507
4,496.33
3/1/2012 1
98215
IRMAGROUP
PROF.SVCS-INSPECTIONS
1 0014093
1 46310 1
2,945.50
$2,945.50
3/1/2012
1
THE COMDYN GROUP INC
CONSULTING SVCS -WK 2/10
0014070
44000
1
1,766.47
3/1/2012 1
98216
ISCHOOLS FIRST FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
IFACILITY REFUND -DBC
001
23002 1
350.001
$350.00
3/1/2012 1
98217
ISIMPSON ADVERTISING INC
IDESIGN SVCS -CITY NEWS MAR
1 0014095
1 44000 1
1,525.001
$1,525.00
3/1/2012
98218
RISKA SOE
FACILITY REFUND-PANTERA
1001
1 23002 1
100.001
$100.00
3/1/2012
98219
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
ELECT SVCS -DIST 38
1385538
1 42126 1
22.761
$22.76
3/1/2012 1
98220
IGLENN STEINBRINK
lCONSULTANT SVCS -WK 2/23
1 0014050
1 44000 1
3,360.001
$3,360.00
3/1/2012 1
98221
SYSTEM SOURCE
TASK CHAIRS -CITY HALL
1 0014093
1 46220 1
2,643.36
$2,643.36
3/1/2012
98222
THE COMDYN GROUP INC
CONSULTING SVCS -WK 1/27
0014070
44000
11810.72
$3,577.19
3/1/2012
1
THE COMDYN GROUP INC
CONSULTING SVCS -WK 2/10
0014070
44000
1
1,766.47
3/1/2012 1 98223 ITIME WARNER CABLE MODEM SVCS -COUNCIL 1 42130 1 52.991 $52.99
Page 4
City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 03/01/2012 thru 03/14/2012
Check Date
Check Number
Vendor Name
Transaction Description
Fund/ Dept
Acct #
I Amount
I Total CheckAmount
3/1/2012
1 98224
TIME WARNER CABLE
ICABLE SVCS -HERITAGE
0015340
1 42125
1 116.011
$116.01
3/1/2012 98225 US BANK CITY CREDIT CARD -FEB 2012 0014411 45405 13,960.45 $13,960.45
3/1/2012
98226
VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFRAGNTS-303248
3/2/12 -LOAN DEDUCTIONS
001
21108
,1,582.96
$26,171.98
3/1/2012
VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFRAGNTS-303248
3/02/12-P/R DEDUCTIONS
001
21108
24,589.02
3/1/2012 98227 VERIZON CALIFORNIA PH.SVCS-DBC 1 0015333 1 42125 1 350.891 $350.89
3/1/2012
98228
VERIZON WIRELESS
CELL CHRGS-CMGR
0014030
42125
104.66
$305.39
3/1/2012
VERIZON WIRELESS
CELL CHRGS-EOC
0014440
42125
58.51
3/1/2012
98369
VERIZON WIRELESS
CELL CHRGS-EOC
0014090
42125
9.92
$47.00
3/1/2012
VERIZON WIRELESS
CELL CHRGS-EOC
0014070
42125
4.92
3/1/2012
98370
VERIZON WIRELESS
CELL CHRGS-DESFORGES
0014070
42125
45.01
$30.72
3/1/2012
VERIZON WIRELESS
CELL CHRGS-AZIZ
0014070
42125
37.36
3/1/2012
98371
VERIZON WIRELESS
CELL CHRGS-SASD MODEM
0014411
42125
45.01
$265.00
3/1/2012 1 98229 VISION SERVICE PLAN MAR 2012 -VISION PREMIUMS 001 21107 1 1,332.23 $1,332.23
3/1/201298230
98231
W.W. GRAINGER INC.
SUPPLIES -PARKS
0015340
41200
29.52
$210.86
3/1/2012
W.W. GRAINGER INC.
SUPPLIES -CITY HALL
0014093
41200
13.48
3/1/2012
98369
W.W. GRAINGER INC.
SUPPLIES -CITY HALL
0014093
41200
167.86
$47.00
3/1/2012
98231
WAXIE SANITARYSUPPLY
SUPPLIES -DBC
0015333
41200
235.98
$1,896.62
3/1/2012
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY
SUPPLIES -DBC
0015333
42210
882.64
3/1/2012
98369
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY
SUPPLIES -CITY HALL
0014093
42210
41.31
$47.00
3/1/2012
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY
SUPPLIES -PARKS
0015340 -
42210
736.69
3/2/2012 1
98232
SO COASTAIR QUALITY MGT DISTRICT
RENTAL-MTG FACILITIES MAR
1 0014090
42140 1
2,000.001
$2,000.00
3/8/2012 1
98369
MONIQUEACOSTA
RECREATION REFUND
1 001
34780 1
47.00
$47.00
3/8/2012 1
98370
IAJAX SIGN GRAPHICS INC.
SUPPLIES -NAMEPLATES
1 0014090
41200 1
30.721
$30.72
3/8/2012
98371
AMERICAN PLANNING ASN
ANNLMEMBERSHIP-N OBON
1 0015210
42315 1
265.00
$265.00
Page 5
City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 03/01/2012 thru 03/14/2012
Check Date
Check Number
Vendor Name
Transaction Description
Fund/ Dept
Acct #
Amount
Total CheckAmount
3/8/2012
98372
AND 1 OFFICIALS
OFFICIAL SVCS-JUL-DEC 11
001535045300
41200
1,676.00
$2,600.00
3/8/2012
98375
AND 1 OFFICIALS
OFFICIAL SVCS -FEB 12
0015350
45300
462.00
$44.94
3/8/2012
AND 1 OFFICIALS
OFFICIAL SVCS -FEB 12
0015350
45300
462.00
3/8/2012
98373
ARROWHEAD
EQ RENTAL -DBC
0015333
1 42130
11.95
$62.32
3/812012
ARROWHEAD
WATER SUPPLIES -DBC
0015333
41200
50.37
3/8/2012
98374
ARTESIA ICE SKATING TRAINING CTR LL
.CONTRACT CLASS -WINTER
1 0015350
1 45320 1
139.201
$139.20
3/8/2012
CAASSOCIATION OF CODE ENFRMNT OFFC
MEMBERSHIP DUES-FREIHOLTZ
0015230
42315
75.00
3/8/2012 1
98375
IAT&T
PH.SVCS-GENERAL
0014090
1 42125 1
44.941
$44.94
3/8/2012
98376
CAASSOCIATION OF CODE ENFRMNT OFFC
MEMBERSHIP DUES -E FLACKS
0015230
1 42315
1 75.00
$150.00
3/8/2012
CAASSOCIATION OF CODE ENFRMNT OFFC
MEMBERSHIP DUES-FREIHOLTZ
0015230
42315
75.00
3/8/2012
98377
CANNING HUNGER INC
REFUND -EN 00-300
001
23012
175.00
$175.00
3/8/2012
CANNING HUNGER INC
REFUND -EN 00-300
001
23012
935.00
3/8/2012
98382
CANNING HUNGER INC
REFUND -EN 00-300
001
34650
-935.00
$4,782.30
3/8/2012
98378
LYDIACASTILLON
FACILITY REFUND -DBC
001
23002
700.00
$496.00
3/8/2012
LYDIACASTILLON
FACILITY CHRGS-DBC
001
36615
-204.00
3/8/2012 1 98379 ICAROL CYNKIN RECREATION REFUND 1 001 1 34730 1 55.001 $55.00
3/8/2012
98380
DAY &NITE COPY CENTER
PRINT SVCS-CDBG CURB
0015510
42110
76.67
$306.68
3/8/2012
DAY & NITE COPY CENTER
PRINT SVCS-CDBG CURB
0015510
42110
230.01
3/8/2012
98381
1 DELTA CARE USA
IMAR 2012 -DENTAL PREMIUMS
001
21104 1
152.961
$152.96
3/8/2012
98382
DELTA DENTAL
MAR 2012 -DENTAL PREMIUMS
001
21104 1
4,782.30
$4,782.30
3/8/2012
98383
DEPT OF RESOURCES RECYCLING & RECOV
REPAYMENT -USED OIL GRANT
115
31870
9,553.52
$9,553.52
3/8/2012 1
98384
JDH MAINTENANCE
ADDL MAINT-CITY HALL
0014093
45300
125.00
$125.00
3/8/2012 1
98385
IDIAMON5 AGE SENIOR CLUB
REIMB-LIABILITY INS 11112
1255215
1 44000 1
1,199.831
$1,199.83
Page 6
City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 03/01/2012 thru 03/14/2012
Check Date
Check Number
Vendor Name
Transaction Description
Fund/ Dept
Acct #
Amount
Total Check Amount
3/8/2012
1 98386
IDIAMOND BAR EVERGREEN SENIOR CLUB
REIMB-LIABILITY INS 11/12
1255215
44000
741.25
$741.25
3/8/2012 98387 DIAMOND BAR MOBIL IV EH MAINT-COMM SVCS 0015310 1 42200 1 142.07 $142.07
3/8/2012
98388
DIAMOND BAR PETTY CASH
FUEL -COMM SVCS
0015310
42310
33.86
$368.91
3/8/2012
DIAMOND BAR PETTY CASH
MILEAGE -CITY CLERK
0014030
42335
39.85
3/8/2012
98390
DIAMOND BAR PETTY CASH
SUPPLIES -GENERAL
0014090
41200
58.22
$1,018.96
3/8/2012
DIAMOND BAR PETTY CASH
MTG-COMM SVCS
0015310
42325
7.00
3/8/2012
98391
DIAMOND BAR PETTY CASH
COMP MAINT-I.T.
0014070
42205
20.65
$3,829.50
3/8/2012
DIAMOND BAR PETTY CASH
MTG-COMM SVCS
0015350
42325
5.00
3/8/2012
DIAMOND BAR PETTY CASH
SUPPLIES -RECYCLING
1155516
41200
20.00
3/8/2012
DIAMOND BAR PETTY CASH
MILEAGE-PNJORKS
0015510
42335
7.00
3/8/2012
DIAMOND BAR PETTY CASH
MILEAGE -ENGINEERING
0015551
42335
49.88
3/8/2012
DIAMOND BAR PETTY CASH
SUPPLIES -RECREATION
0015350
41200
22.58
3/8/2012
DIAMOND BAR PETTY CASH
MILEAGE -COM DEV
0015210
42335
20.87
3/8/2012
DIAMOND BAR PETTY CASH
PARKING -FINANCE
0014050
42335
27.00
3/8/2012
DIAMOND BAR PETTY CASH
PARKING -CITY CLRK
0014030
42335
10.00
3/8/2012
DIAMOND BAR PETTY CASH
ISSA MTG-I.T
0014070
42330
45.00
3/8/2012
DIAMOND BAR PETTY CASH
MISC-GENERAL
0014090
42395
2.00
3/8/2012 1
98389
DIVERSIFIED TRANSPORTATION INC
SHUTTLE SVCS -SNOW FEST
1 1125350
1 45310
897.60
$897.60
3/8/2012
EVERGREEN INTERIORS
PLANT SVCS -HERITAGE PK
0015340
42210
135.00
3/8/2012 1
98390
IDOLPHIN RENTS INC
EQ RENTAL -CONCERT SHARE
0015350
1 42130
1,018.96
$1,018.96
3/8/2012
EVERGREEN INTERIORS
PLANT MAINT-LIBRARY
0014090
42210
107.00
3/8/2012
98391
EAST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
PARKING CITE ADMIN -JAN 12
001
32230
3,829.50
$3,829.50
3/8/2012
98392
EVERGREEN INTERIORS
PLANT SVCS -DBC
0015333
45300
177.00
$4,681.45
3/8/2012
EVERGREEN INTERIORS
PLANT SVCS -HERITAGE PK
0015340
42210
135.00
3/8/2012
EVERGREEN INTERIORS
PLANT MAINT-CITY HALL
0014090
42210
230.00
3/8/2012
EVERGREEN INTERIORS
PLANT MAINT-LIBRARY
0014090
42210
107.00
3/8/2012
EVERGREEN INTERIORS
PLANTS INSTALL -CITY HALL
0014093
41200
4,032.45
3/8/2012
98393
EXPRESS MAIL CORPORATE ACCOUNT
EXPRESS MAIL -GENERAL
0014090
42120
33.59
$137.99
3/8/2012
EXPRESS MAIL CORPORATE ACCOUNT
EXPRESS MAIL -FPL 2011-447
001
23010
17.40
3/8/2012
EXPRESS MAIL CORPORATE ACCOUNT
EXPRESS MAIL -FPL 2006-197
001
23010
17.40
Page 7
City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 03/01/2012 thru 03/14/2012
Check Date
Check Number
Vendor Name
Transaction Description
Fund/ Dept
Acct #
Amount
Total CheckAmount
3/8/2012
3/8/2012
98393...
EXPRESS MAIL CORPORATE ACCOUNT
EXPRESS MAIL CORPORATE ACCOUNT
EXPRESS MAIL -FPL 2011-448
EXPRESS MAIL -FPL 2011-449
001
001
23010
23010
34.80
34.80
$137.99...
3/8/2012 1 98394 1EXTERMINETICS OF SO CAL INC FIREANTS-G/SPRINGS 1 0015340 42210 1 175.00 $175.00
3/8/2012
1 98395
FEDEX
EXPRESS MAIL -GENERAL
0014090
42120
151.03
$180.87
3/8/2012
1
FEDEX
EXPRESS MAIL -FPL 11-428
001
23010
29.84
3/8/2012 98396 GATEWAY CORPORATE CENTER ASSOC CAPITAL CONTRIBUTION -MAR 0014093 1 42210 1 1,785.001 $1,785.00
3/8/2012
98397
HALL & FOREMAN, INC.
PROF.SVCS-EN 10-702
001
23012
115.00
$7,505.35
3/8/2012
HALL & FOREMAN, INC.
PROF.SVCS-EN 08-605
001
23012
390.00
3/8/2012
HALL & FOREMAN, INC.
PROF.SVCS-EN 11-730
001
23012
28.75
3/8/2012
HALL & FOREMAN, INC.
ADMIN FEES -EN 11-730
001
23012
5.18
3/8/2012
HALL & FOREMAN, INC.
ADMIN FEES -EN 11-730
001
34650
-5.18
3/8/2012
HALL & FOREMAN, INC.
PROF.SVCS-EN 07-560
001
23012
2,437.50
3/8/2012
HALL & FOREMAN, INC.
ADMIN FEES -EN 07-560
001
23012
438.75
3/8/2012
HALL & FOREMAN, INC.
ADMIN FEES -EN 07-560
001
34650
-438.75
3/8/2012
HALL & FOREMAN, INC.
PROF.SVCS-EN 07-598
001
23012
632.50
3/8/2012
HALL & FOREMAN, INC.
ADMIN FEES -EN 07-598
001
23012
113.85
3/8/2012
HALL & FOREMAN, INC.
ADMIN FEES -EN 07-598
001
34650
-113.85
3/8/2012
HALL & FOREMAN, INC.
PROF.SVCS-EN 07-555
001
23012
230.00
3/8/2012
HALL & FOREMAN, INC.
ADMIN FEES -EN 07-555
001
23012
41.40
3/8/2012
HALL & FOREMAN, INC.
ADMIN FEES -EN 07-555
001
34650
-41.40
3/8/2012
HALL & FOREMAN, INC.
PROF.SVCS-PLAN CHECK
0015551
R45223
2,217.22
3/8/2012
HALL & FOREMAN, INC.
PROF.SVCS-PLAN CHECK
0015551
45223
222.35
3/8/2012
HALL & FOREMAN, INC.
PROF.SVCS-INSPECTIONS
0015510
45227
650.00
3/8/2012
HALL & FOREMAN, INC.
PROF.SVCS-INSPECTIONS
0015510
45227
164.87
3/8/2012
HALL & FOREMAN, INC.
PROF.SVCS-INSPECTIONS
0015510
45227
122.25
3/8/2012
HALL & FOREMAN, INC.
PROF.SVCS-FPL 2011-433
001
23010
294.91
3/8/2012
HALL & FOREMAN, INC.
ADMIN FEES -FPL 2011-433
001
23010
53.08
3/8/2012
HALL& FOREMAN, INC.
ADMIN FEES -FPL 2011-433
001
34430
-53.08
3/8/2012
HALL & FOREMAN, INC.
ADMIN FEES -EN 10-702
001
23012
20.70
3/8/2012
HALL & FOREMAN, INC.
ADMIN FEES -EN 10-702
001
34650
-20.70
3/8/2012
IHALL & FOREMAN, INC.
ADMIN FEES -EN 08-605
001
1 23012
70.20
Page 8
City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 03/01/2012 thru 03/14/2012
Check Date
Check Number
Vendor Name
Transaction Description
Fund/ Dept
Acct #
Amount
Total Check Amount
3/8/2012
98397...
HALL & FOREMAN, INC.
ADMIN FEES -EN 08-605
001
34650
-70.20
$7,505.35 ...
3/8/2012
98398
HARDY& HARPER INC
REPAIRS-SIDEWALK/PAVEMNT
0015554
45502
36,252.40
$74,933.50
3/8/2012
HARDY & HARPER INC
REPAIRS-SIDEWALK/PAVEMNT
0015554
45504
38,681.10
3/8/2012
98399
IHEERY INTERNATIONAL INC
CNSTRCTN MNGMNT-JAN 12
0014093 1
46310 1
43,251.201
$43,251.20
3/8/2012
INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN
LEGALAD-FPL 2011445
001
23010
380.20
3/8/2012 1
98400
HIRSCH PIPEAND SUPPLY INC
MAINT-COMM SVCS
0015340
1 42210 1
1,935.92
$1,935.92
3/8/2012
INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN
LEGALAD-FPL 2011431
001
23010
371.80
3/8/2012
98401
KEVIN HOUSE
IT & T COMM -2/16/2012
0015510
44100 1
45.001
$45.00
3/8/2012
98402
INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERS
CDBG-CURB RAMP JAN 12
2505510
46420 1
435.50
$435.50
3/8/2012
98403
INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN
LEGALAD-DEV CODE AMNDMNT
0015210
44220
567.80
$1,702.80
3/8/2012
INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN
LEGALAD-FPL 2011445
001
23010
380.20
3/8/2012
98405
INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN
LEGALAD-FPL 2012-455
001
23010
383.00
$34.00
3/8/2012
INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN
LEGALAD-FPL 2011431
001
23010
371.80
3/8/2012 1
98404
INTERIOR OFFICE SOLUTIONS
FURNITURE -LIBRARY
1 0014093
1 46220 1
47,612.38
$47,612.38
3/8/2012 1
98405
MOHAMAD R JAHANVASH
REIMB-WINTER S/FEST
0015350
1 45300 1
34.00
$34.00
3/8/2012 1
98406
KEITH JOHNSON
DJ SVCS -SR MARDI GRAS DNC
1 0015350
1 45300 1
350.001
$350.00
3/8/2012 1
98407
JUDICIAL DATA SYSTEM CORP
PARKING CITEADMIN-JUN 11
1 0014411
1 45405 1
115.48
$115.48
3/8/2012 1
98408
DON KARR
RECREATION REFUND
001
34730 1
26.00
$26.00
3/8/2012 1
98409
IKENS HARDWARE
SUPPLIES -ROAD MAINT
0015554
1 41250 1
87.881
$87.88
3/8/2012
98410
KWIKCOVERS
SUPPLIES-SPCL EVENTS
1 41200
1,314.09
$1,314.09
3/8/2012
98411
KWANG HO LEE
PLNG COMM -JAN 2012
0015210
44100
65.00
$65.00
3/8/2012 1
98412
LEWIS ENGRAVING INC.
SUPPLIES -SR BADGES
0015350
41200
48.94
$48.94
3/8/2012 1
98413
ILIANA PINCHER
T & T COMM -2/16/2012
0015510
1 44100 1
45.001
$45.00
Page 9
City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 03/01/2012 thru 03/14/2012
Check Date ICheckNumberl Vendor Name I Transaction Description I Fund/ Dept I Acct # I Amount Total CheckAmount
3/8/2012
98414
LI LI LIANG
REFUND -EN 11-727
1 001
1 23012
775.37
$775.37
3/8/2012
LOS ANGELES COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS
INDUSTRIAL WASTE -DEC 11
0015510
45530
927.97
3/8/2012
98415
SHERI LIEBE
CONTRACT CLASS -WINTER
1 0015350
1 45320
655.80
$655.80
3/8/2012
98416
LOS ANGELES COUNTY PUBLIC'
INDUSTRIAL WASTE-NOV 11
0015510
45530
1,572.77
$2,772.55
3/8/2012
LOS ANGELES COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS
INDUSTRIAL WASTE -DEC 11
0015510
45530
927.97
3/8/2012
.98418
LOS ANGELES COUNTY PUBLIC'
SUMP PUMP MAINT-JAN 12
0015340
42210
271.81
$400.00
3/8/2012
98417
1JENNIFER LYNN MAHLKE
T & T COMM -2/16/2012
1 0015510
44100 1
45.001
$45.00
3/8/2012
MCE CORPORATION
RIGHT-OF-WAY MAINT--JAN 12
0015554
45522
1 356.76
3/8/2012
.98418
FARIDA MAHMOOD
FACILITY REFUND -DBC
001
36615
400.00
$400.00
3/8/2012
98419
IMARSHA D ROA
REIMB-C/HALL OPEN HOUSE
0014090
42395 1
201.02
$201.02
3/8/2012
98420
GARYMARTINEZ
FACILITY REFUND -DBC
1 001
23002 1
350.001
$350.00
3/8/2012
98421
MCE CORPORATION
ROAD MAINT SVCS -JAN 12
0015554
45502
8,452.74
$9,273.14
3/8/2012
MCE CORPORATION
RIGHT-OF-WAY MAINT--JAN 12
0015554
45522
1 356.76
3/8/2012
98423
MCE CORPORATION
STORM DRAIN MAINT-JAN 12
0015554
45512
1 463.64
$16.00
3/8/2012
98422
IRENATE MECHTOLD
RECREATION REFUND
1 007
34720 1
50.00
$50.00
3/8/2012
MOONLIGHT PRESS
SUPPLIES -ENVELOPES
0015210
41200
1
249.81
3/8/2012 -
98423
MOBILE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INCORP
SUPPLIES -PARKS
0015340
41200
16.00
$16.00
3/8/2012 1
98424
KENNETH MOK
IT & T COMM -2/16/2012
0015510
1 44100 1
45.00
$45.00
3/8/2012
98425
MOONLIGHT PRESS
PRINT SVCS -BUDGET BKS
0014090
42110
408.90
$903.71
3/8/2012
MOONLIGHT PRESS
SUPPLIES -ENVELOPES
0015210
41200
1
249.81
3/8/2012
98427
MOONLIGHT PRESS
SUPPLIES -ENVELOPES
0015510
41200
245.00
$4,467.00
3/8/2012 1
98426
MULTIVISTA LA
PHOTO DOC FEE -CITY HALL
1 0014093
1 45000 1
500.001
$500.00
3/8/2012
NEAD LLC
APP MONTHLY MAINT-FEB 12
0014095
44000
79.99
3/8/2012 1
98427
NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES
MEMBERSHIP DUES -5/12-
1 42315 1
4,467.001
$4,467.00
3/8/2012
98428
NEAD LLC
APP MONTHLY MAINTJAN 12
0014095
44000
79.99
$159.98
3/8/2012
NEAD LLC
APP MONTHLY MAINT-FEB 12
0014095
44000
79.99
Page 10
Check Date
City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 03/01/2012 thru 03/14/2012
Vendor Name
Description
Fund/ Dept I Acct# I Amount
i Ural urocnrniUum
3/8/2012 1
98429
STEVE G NELSON
PLNG COMM -JAN 2012
0015210
1 44100 1
130.00
$130.00
3/8/2012
1
OFFICEMAX INC
SUPPLIES -GENERAL
0014090
41200
71.57
3/8/2012
98430
CHUCK NGUYEN
REFUND -GRADING BOND DEP
001
36900
5,079.60
$5,079.60
3/8/2012
98431
OFFICEMAX INC
SUPPLIES-H/R
0014060
41200
47.37
$498.43
3/8/2012
1
OFFICEMAX INC
SUPPLIES -GENERAL
0014090
41200
71.57
3/8/2012
98433
OFFICEMAX INC
SUPPLIES -GENERAL
0014090
41200
10.09
$47.75
3/8/2012
OFFICEMAX INC
SUPPLIES -GENERAL
0014090
41200
38.82
3/8/2012
98437
OFFICEMAX INC
SUPPLIES -GENERAL
0014090
41200
14.96
$1,047.15
3/8/2012
OFFICEMAX INC
SUPPLIES -RECREATION
0015350
41200
315.62
3/8/2012 1
98432
IVICTOR PORTILLA
FACILITY REFUND -DBC
1 001
1 36615 1
400.00
$400.00
3/8/2012
1
PUBLIC STORAGE #23051
RENTAL -UNIT 2145
0014090
1
42140
272.00
3/8/2012
98433
POST 19 LA COUNTY FIRE EXPLORERS
REIMB-WINTER S/FEST
1 0015554
145300 1
47.751
$47.75
3/8/2012
98434
PUBLIC STORAGE #23051
RENTAL -UNIT 2153
0014090
1 42140
1 272.00
$544.00
3/8/2012
1
PUBLIC STORAGE #23051
RENTAL -UNIT 2145
0014090
1
42140
272.00
3/8/2012 1
98435
IPULTE HOMES CORP
REFUND -EN 05-475
001
23012
488.27
$488.27
3/8/2012
1
SASE COMPANY INC
EQ MAINT-ROAD MAINT
0015554
42200
76.00
3/8/2012
98436
S C SIGNS & SUPPLIES LLC
SUPPLIES -ROAD MAINT
1 0015554
1 41250 1
619.29
$619.29
3/8/2012 1
98437
SAFEWAY SIGN COMPANY
SUPPLIES -ROAD MAINT
1 0015554
1 41250 1
1,047.15
$1,047.15
3/8/2012
98438
SASE COMPANY INC
EQ MAINT-ROAD MAINT
0015554
1 42200
1 14.61
$90.61
3/8/2012
1
SASE COMPANY INC
EQ MAINT-ROAD MAINT
0015554
42200
76.00
3/8/2012 1 98439 SECTRAN SECURITY INC. COURIER SVCS -MAR 12 1 0014090 1 44000 1 308.46 $308.46
3/8/2012
98440
JAGDISH SHAH
PLNG COMM -JAN 2012
0015210
44100
65.00
$130.00
3/8/2012
1
JAGDISH SHAH
PLNG COMM -JAN 2012
0015210
44100
65.00
3/8/2012
98441
SIMPSON ADVERTISING INC
GRAPHIC DESIGN -CITY HALL
0014095
44000
1 1,234.31
$3,627.31
3/8/2012
SIMPSON ADVERTISING INC
DBCAD-NEW PH NUMBER
0014095
44000
125.00
3/8/2012
SIMPSON ADVERTISING INC
PRINT SVCS -BUS CARDS
0014095
42110
2,268.00
1
Page 11
City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 03/01/2012 thru 03/14/2012
Check Date
Check Number
Vendor Name
Transaction Description
Fund/ Dept
Acct #
Amount
Total CheckAmount
3/8/2012
98442
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
ELECT SVCS-TRFFC CONTROL
0015510
42126
684.82
$3,422.00
3/8/2012
98444
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
ELECT SVCS-TRFFC CONTROL
0015510
42126
2,094.26
$1,533.82
3/8/2012
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
ELECT SVCS-TRFFC CONTROL
0015510
42126
84.93
3/8/2012
98449
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
ELECT SVCS-TRFFC CONTROL
0015510
42126
144.20
$363.72
3/8/2012
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
ELECT SVCS-TRFFC CONTROL
0015510
42126
413.79
3/8/2012 1
98443
ISTITCHES UNIFORMS & EMBROIDERY
SUPPLIES -YOUTH JERSEY
1 0015350
41200
52.20
$52.20
3/8/2012
THE SAN GABRIEL VALLEY NEWSPAPER GR
LEGALAD-SITE D
0014090
44000
496.52
3/8/2012 1
98444
THE BROWNSTONE CAFE
DINNER -SR DANCE 3/14
1 0015350
1 45300 1
1,533.821
$1,533.82
3/8/2012
98445
THE SAN GABRIEL VALLEY NEWSPAPER GR
LEGALAD-FPL 2012455
001
23010
369.56
$2,110.00
3/8/2012
THE SAN GABRIEL VALLEY NEWSPAPER GR
LEGALAD-SITE D
0014090
44000
496.52
3/8/2012
98448
THE SAN GABRIEL VALLEY NEWSPAPER GR
LEGALAD-FPL 2011445
001
23010
366.80
$950.00
3/8/2012
THE SAN GABRIEL VALLEY NEWSPAPER GR
LEGAL AD -FPL 2011431
001
23010
372.32
3/8/2012
98449
THE SAN GABRIEL VALLEY NEWSPAPER GR
LEGALAD-DEV CODE AMENDMN
0015210
44220
504.80
$363.72
3/8/2012
98446
THE SAUCE CREATIVE SERVICES
POSTCARDS -EASTER EGG HUNT
0015350
41200
400.00
$733.99
3/8/2012
THE SAUCE CREATIVE SERVICES
DESIGN SVCS -POSTCARDS
0015350
45300
333.99
3/8/2012 1
98447
JIMMYE LOU THIES
ICONTRACT CLASS -WINTER
0015350 1
45320 1
756.001
$756.00
3/8/2012
VERIZON CALIFORNIA
PH.SVCS-GENERAL
0014090
42125
30.39
3/8/2012 1
98448
TIME WARNER CABLE
JINTERNET SVCS -CITY HALL
1 0014070
44030
950.00
$950.00
3/8/2012
VERIZON CALIFORNIA
PH.SVCS-HERITAGE C/CTR
0015340
42125
78.23
3/8/2012 1
98449
TNT PRINTING
PRINT SVCS -BROCHURES
0015350
1 42110 1
363.72
$363.72
3/8/2012 1
98450
ITRENCH PLATE RENTAL CO
RENTAL EQ-DBB/STP CYN
1 0015554
1 42130 1
225.001
$225.00
3/8/2012 1
98451
ULI THE URBAN LAND INSTITUTE
MEMBERSHIP DUES-GUBMAN
0015210
1 42315
225.00
$225.00
3/8/2012 1
98452
VALLEYTROPHY
TROPHIES -YOUTH BSKTBALL
1 0015350
1 41200 1
1,871.85
$1,871.85
3/8/2012
98453
VERIZON CALIFORNIA
PH.SVCS-GENERAL
0014090
42125
513.02
$904.58
3/8/2012
VERIZON CALIFORNIA
PH.SVCS-GENERAL
0014090
42125
30.39
3/8/2012
VERIZON CALIFORNIA
PH.SVCS-FAX LINE/CMGR
0014030
42125
35.97
3/8/2012
VERIZON CALIFORNIA
PH.SVCS-HERITAGE C/CTR
0015340
42125
78.23
3/8/2012
VERIZON CALIFORNIA
PH.SVCS-GENERAL
0014090
42125
91.65
Page 12
City of Diamond Bar - Check Register 03/01/2012 thru 03/14/2012
Check Date
Check Number
Vendor Name Transaction Description
Fund/=#
0015350
Amount
I Total Check Amount
3/8/2012
1 98453...
IVERIZON CALIFORNIA PH.SVCS-GENERAL
0014090
1 42125
155.321
$904.58...
3/8/2012
98454
WALNUT VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST
FACILITY RENTAL -JAN 2012
0015350
42140
294.00
$6,785.10
3/8/2012
1
WALNUT VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST
FACILITY RENTAL -JAN 2012
0015350
42140
2,923.20
3/8/2012
98457
WALNUT VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST
FACILITY RENTAL -FEB 2012
0015350
42140
1,341.90
-
3/8/2012
WALNUT VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST
FACILITY RENTAL -JAN 2012
0015350
42140
378.00
3/8/2012
98458
WALNUT VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST
FACILITY REFUND -FEB 2012
0015350
42140
1,848.00
$264.00
3/8/2012
98455
WILLDAN GEOTECHNICAL
PROF.SVCS-EN 10-715
001
23012
1,295.00
$1,665.00
3/8/2012
1
WILLDAN GEOTECHNICAL
ADMIN FEES -EN 10-715
001
23012
233.10
3/8/2012
98457
WILLDAN GEOTECHNICAL
ADMIN FEES -EN 10-715
001
34650
-233.10
-
3/8/2012
WILLDAN GEOTECHNICAL
PROF.SVCS-EN 10-702
001
23012
370.00
3/8/2012
98458
WILLDAN GEOTECHNICAL
ADMIN FEES -EN 10-702
001
23012
66.60
$264.00
3/8/2012
WILLDAN GEOTECHNICAL
ADMIN FEES -EN 10-702
001
34650
-66.60
3/8/2012
98456
PAUL WRIGHT
AGS N SVCS-CNCL/PLNG MT
0014090
44000 1
300.00
$300.00
3/8/2012
1
UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA, NA
FEB DEB SVCS -INTEREST
3704090
47100
30,378.97
3/8/2012 1
98457
YI TONYTORNG
PING COMM -JAN 2012
0015210
44100 1
130.00
$130.00
3/8/2012
98458
YOUNG REMBRANDTS CORP
CONTRACT CLASS -WINTER
1 0015350
1 45320 1
264.001
$264.00
3/14/2012
98459
GLENN STEINBRINK
CONSULTANT SVCS -WK 3/7
0014050
1 44000 1
2,240.00
$2,240.00
3/8/2012
FEB 2012
UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA, NA
FEB DEBT SVCS -PRINCIPAL
3704090
1 47050
38,230.86
$68,609.83
3/8/2012
1
UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA, NA
FEB DEB SVCS -INTEREST
3704090
47100
30,378.97
3/8/2012
JAN 2012
UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA, NA
JAN DEBT SVCS -PRINCIPAL
3704090
47050
38,230.86
$68,609.83
3/8/2012
1
UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA, NA
JAN DEBT SVCS -INTEREST
3704090
47100
30,378.97
3/1/2012
1 PO120125
1COMMONWEALTH BUSINESS BANK
CONSTRUCTION -CITY HALL
0014093
46310
126,489.94
$126,489.94
3/1/2012
1 PO120126
1COMMONWEALTH BUSINESS BANK
CONSTRUCTION -LIBRARY -
0014093
46310
123,308.11
$123,308.11
3/1/2012
1 RETENTIO
1COMMONWEALTH BUSINESS BANK
RETENTION PAYABLE -1/31/12
1 001.
20300 1
-116,280.87
($116,280.87)
$1,084,262.57
Page 13
CITY COUNCIL
TO: Honorable Mayor and
VIA: James DeStefano, City Ma
TITLE: APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION
LIST AS DEFINED IN ORDINAI
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None.
BACKGROUND:
Agenda #
Meeting Date:
6.3
March 20. 2012
AGENDA REPORT
of the City Council
12 -XX ESTABLISHING AN APPROVED VENDOR
NO 05(2006).
The City's Purchasing Ordinance No. 05(2006) includes a provision for the establishment of an
Approved Vendor's List every January. This list will be comprised of vendors who have consistently
provided excellent service to the City, have traditionally been the lowest bidder, can deliver goods or
services on time, or consistently meet or exceed product/service specifications.
City staff has performed an annual review and update of the vendor list and is requesting approval at
this time. Vendors on this list have historically met City standards for quality and price of services. If
at any time a vendor falls below the expectations established in the Ordinance, the vendor may be
removed from the list by City staff. Unfortunately, this item was overlooked and not brought to
Council during the normal annual renewal period in early January 2012. Upon approval, this list will
be valid from February 1, 2012 through January 31, 2013.
Prepared by:
Dianna L. Honeywell
Finance Director
Reviewed by:
David Doyle
Assistant City Manager
Attachment:
1. Vendors List Revisions.
2. Resolution 2012 -XX.
3. ExhibitA— Approved Vendor List Effective February 1, 2011 through January 31, 2012.
City of Diamond Bar
2012 Vendor List Changes
F-,Tq re ffd*Tlr
Attachment 1
Vendor
Product
Explanation
Advance Tutoring
Contract Class Instructor -
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Math Classes
Alberto Yap
Contract Class Instructor-
** See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Dance Crew
Alicia Speare
Contract Class Instructor -
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Sign
April Lani
Contract Class Instructor-
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Voice
Charles Morales
Contract Class Instructor -
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Guitar
Claire Liang
Contract Class Instructor -
* See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Imagination Through Art
Danielle Baccaro
Contract Class Instructor-
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Baby Ballet
Day Lite Mainteneace Co.
Maintenace Services
Responsive service and competitive prices
D.Y. Performance Fitness
Contract Class Instructor -
* See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Speed & Agility
Event Booking and Services
City Birthday Party carnival
Only vendor able to provide big carnival rides for 1 day
rides
event
Frantone
Meals for special events
Quality food with great presentation
Maya Devi
Contract Class Instructor -
* See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Restorative Yoga
Music N Smart
Contract Class Instructor-
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Piano & Violin
Quinn Rental Services
Equipment Rental
Quality equipment, great service, competitive prices
Rishi Kumar
Contract Class Instructor -
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Growing Your Own Food
Rod Ertel
Contract Class Instructor -
* See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Intro to Excel
So Cal Sanitation
Special Event - Restrooms
Vendor has provided great customer service for the past 4
& Sinks
years
Southern California Boiler
Boiler Maintenance
Responsive service and competitive prices
Vidiflow
Audio/Visual
Original Installers familiar with proprietary systems
VIS
Backflow testing
Quality service and competitive prices
Deletions
Vendor
Product
Periwinkle Productions
City Birthday Party animals
United Site Services
Special Event - Restrooms
& Sinks
Attachment 2
RESOLUTION NO. 2012 -XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DIAMOND BAR ESTABLISHING AN APPROVED
VENDOR LIST AS DEFINED BY ORDINANCE NO.
05(2006) TO BE IN EFFECT FROM FEBRUARY 1, 2012
UNTIL JANUARY 31, 2013
WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted Ordinance No. 05(2006) which
became effective August 31, 2006; and
WHEREAS, the Ordinance defines vendor list procurement and requires the
annual establishment of an Approved Vendor List; and
WHEREAS, staff prepared and attached Exhibit A — Approved Vendor List in
accordance with the Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar Hereby
Resolves that the vendors eligible for Vendor List Procurement as defined by
Ordinance No. 05(2006) are contained in the attached Exhibit A — Approved Vendor List
and will be in effect from February 1, 2012 until January 31, 2013.
PASSED, ADOPTED, AND APPROVED this 20th day of March, 2012.
Ling -Ling Chang, Mayor
I, Tommye A. Cribbins, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, California, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly passed, approved and
adopted by the City Council of the City of Diamond Bar, California, at its regular meeting
held on the 20th day of March, 2012, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:
Tommye A. Cribbins, City Clerk
Exhibit A
City of Diamond Bar
Approved Vendor List
Effective February 1, 2012 through January 31, 2013
Vendor
Product
Explanation
4imprint
Recycling Promotional
Ability to provide a wide variety of promotional items made
Annette Drumonde
Items
from recycled materials
AAA Flag and Banner
DBC Logo Flags
Local vendor with DB Logo supplies
Adapt Consulting
Recycling Promotional
Ability to provide promotional items made from recycled
Items
materials
Advance Tutoring
Contract Class Instructor -
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Audio Visual Innovations
Math Classes
Original installer of DBC AV system.
Affordable Generator Service
Generator Maintenance
Provides quality and timely service to emergency
Balloons by Alice
Bday & July 4th Balloons
generator at DBC
AGI Academy
Contract Class Instructor-
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
BC Continental
Computer Classes
Consistently provide the least expensive food
Alberto Yap
Contract Class Instructor -
** See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Dance Crew
response
Albertson's
Misc. Supplies
Local vendor for program supplies
Alicia Speare
contract Class Instructor-
•* See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Printer Supplies & Consistently bid below the competition and provide
Americomp Maintenance superior quality for printer maintenance & toner supplies
city wide
Ameritech Copier Supplies & Maint Lowest bidder and provides timely quality service
Anaheim Glass Glass Repairs Consistent low bidders, quick response and high quality
And One Officials
Sport Official Svcs
Originally selected through and RFP process and provide
quality service for a fair price
Annette Drumonde
Contract Class Instructor-
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Tot Enrichment
April Lani
Contract Class Instructor -
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Voice
Arrowwoods
Interior wood DBC
High quality repairs and installation of mill work
Audio Visual Innovations
AN System service
Original installer of DBC AV system.
B & T Cattle
Brush Removal by Goats
Consistent low bidder, provides quality and timely service
Balloons by Alice
Bday & July 4th Balloons
Provides best price, & supply for 4th of July, B -Day,
Bashful Butler Catering
Caterer
Provides quality, upscale food with great presentation
BC Continental
Caterer
Consistently provide the least expensive food
Bear State Air Conditioning
HVAC Svc. DBC
Low bidder for service contract. Quality work, fast
response
Best Lighting
Lighting Supplies
Familiar with City equipment, fast emergency response
Bill Giebe
Contract Class Instructor -
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Yoga
BSN - dba Sport Supply Group
Sporting Goods
Lowest price from bids and meets all requirements
Page 1
Exhibit A
City of Diamond Bar
Approved Vendor List
Effective February 1, 2012 through January 31, 2013
Vendor Product Explanation
Calsense Landscape controls Proprietary equip
Carolwood Productions Video Productions Local company that has continued to provide quality, cost
effective services.
Carrot Top Industries
Park Flags
Lowest price from bids and meets all requirements
Center Ice Arena
Contract Class Instructor-
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Ice Skating
CDW Government, Inc. (CDW-
Electronic Components
Meets product requirements, provides low prices and fast
G)
and Equipment
delivery
Charles Morales
Contract Class Instructor -
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Guitar
Charter Oak Gymnastics
Contract Class Instructor -
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Gymnastics
Cheryl Skidmore
Contract Class Instructor -
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Horsemanship
Christine Angeli
Contract Class Instructor -
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Adult Crafts
Claire Liang
Contract Class Instructor -
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Imagination Through Art
CM School Supply
Tiny Tots & Day Camp
Local vendor with specialty supplies needed for programs
Supplies
Comlock
Keys/Lock supplies
Proprietary lock system for the DBC
Commercial Lighting
Lighting Supplies
Vendor able to provide specialized lighting supplies at
good prices and in a timely manner
Connie Lillie
Contract Class Instructor -
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Jazzercise
Construction Hardware Company
Parks Maintenance
Availability of commercial hardware products, locks, door
Supplies
frames and door closers
Offsite Data Storage
Provides consistent, quality services at a reasonable
Cornerstone Records Manageme
Svcs
cost. (Pending Name change of L.A. Data Security)
Crafco Inc
Asphalt Materials
Manufacturer & vendor with specialty repair materials for
pavement asphalt.
Craig Davis
Contract Class Instructor -
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Piano
Creator's Touch
Contract Class Instructor -
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Youth Art Classes
Da Hula Studio
Contract Class Instructor
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
- Dance
Danielle Baccaro
Contract Class Instructor-
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Baby Ballet
Page 2
Exhibit A
City of Diamond Bar
Approved Vendor List
Effective February 1, 2012 through January 31, 2013
Vendor
Product
Explanation
Darla Tighe
Contract Class Instructor-
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Voice
David Fernandez
Contract Class Instructor -
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Adult Dance
Day Lite Mainteneace Co.
Maintenace Services
Responsive service and competitive prices
Day & Nite Copy Center, Inc.
Copying/Printing
Able to provide same day service at low cost. Often as
low bidder.
DB International Deli
Meeting Supplies
Meets requirement and provides good service including
delivery
Deane Homes Swim Club
Rental Facility - Contract
Facility Use Agreement signed yearly.
Classes
DFS Flooring
Proprietary Method Carpet
Local vendor that uses manufacturer's process to clean
cleaning for DBC Carpet
Dupont carpets at DBC
Diamond Bar Hand Car Wash
City Fleet Car Wash
Local vendor with quality service
Diamond Bar Mobil
Vehicle maint
Low bids, quality work, quick response
Diversified Paratransit
Shuttle Service
Only Vendor able to provide handicapped shuttles
Diversified Printers
Print Svcs -
Secured through a RFP process and found to be the
Newsletter/Rec Guide
lowest bidder.
Diversified Window Coverings
Maint of Mechanical
Sale Source Vendor - this vendor required by
Shades @ DBC
manufacturer.
Dog Dealers, Inc.
Contract Class Instructor-
* See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Dog Obedience
Doggie Walk Bags
Dog Bags for Park
Responsive vendor for product to fill dispensers in parks
Dispensers
Dolphin Rents
Bday Equipment
Lowest price for B -day party, & snowfest.
Dora Lonyai
Contract Class Instructor -
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Make-Up/Skin Care
Doty Bros.
Emergency main line
Low bidder for quality work and fast response
repair under asphalt
Temporary and
Dunn's Fence Co.
Permanent Fence
Lowest bidding prices
Supplier
D.Y. Performance Fitness
Contract Class Instructor -
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Speed & Agility
Education To Go
Contract Class Instructor -
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
On -Line Classes
Erika Vieyra
Contract Class Instructor -
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Online Driver's Ed
Page 3
Exhibit A
City of Diamond Bar
Approved Vendor List
Effective February 1, 2012 through January 31, 2013
Vendor
Product
Explanation
Esperanza Flores
Dance Contract Class
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Event Booking and Services
City Birthday Party
Only vendor able to provide big carnival rides for 1 day
carnival rides
event
Evergreen Interiors
Interior Plant Maint-City
Lowest Bid & Meets Requirements
Hall & Library
Executive Promotional Products
Promo Items
Often a low bidder providing quality, timely merchandise.
Has artwork on file for a variety of items.
Exterior Products
City's Event Banners
Lowest bidder at time banners were purchased -- now
stores, cleans, up -dates and posts banners as directed
Exterminetics of So. Cal
Rodent/insect Control at
Low bidder for service contract. Quality work, fast
DBC
response
Firestone Tire Co.
Vehicle maint
Low bids, quality work, quick response
Food From the Heart
Caterer
Consistently bid below the competition and provide
superior quality
Foothill Building Materials
Sand & Sandbags
Only local vendor able to deliver sandbags and sand to
fire stations.
Frank Stein Novelty Co.
Specialty Supplies
Responsive vendor with specialty supplies needed for
programs
Frantone
Meals for special events
Quality food with great presentation
Gabriela Klein
Contract Class Instructor -
Adult Fitness
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Gasser/Olds Company
Bronze plaques/signs
Provides consistent, quality services at a reasonable cost.
Glass Eye Productions
Video Productions
Provides consistent, quality services at a reasonable cost.
Glenn's Refrigeration
Refrigeration/Freezer
Repair
Quality, responsive repair service
Electronic Components
Meets product requirements, provides low prices and fast
GovConnection, Inc.
and Equipment
delivery
Grand Mobil
Vehicle maint
Low bidder, quality work, quick response
Graybar
Electrical Supplies
Local vendor with specialty repair materials
H2O Pressure Washing
Pressure washing
Lowest bidder, quick response for small jobs
Hirsch Pipe and Supply
Plumbing supplies
Local vendor with specialty repair materials
Home Depot
Misc. Supplies
Local vendor for repair materials and program supplies
Hot Shots
Youth Uniforms
Traditionally lowest Price from bids.
Page 4
Exhibit A
City of Diamond Bar
Approved Vendor List
Effective February 1, 2012 through January 31, 2013
Vendor
Product
Explanation
Hydro -Connections
Irrigation Supplies
Local vendor with specialty repair materials
Impact Signs
Informational Signs
Create and Install informational signs in a timely and
professional manner
IMS Refrigeration
Ice Machine repairs
High quality repairs at competitive prices
Jacqueline Ng
Contract Class Instructor -
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Yoga
James Events
Bday rides
Only vendor to meet requirements.
Jeanie Khoury
Contract Class Instructor -
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Adult Crafts
Jeffrey Hirose
Contract Class Instructor -
* See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Golf
Jerry Short
Contract Class Instructor-
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Karate
Jessica Braun
Contract Class Instructor-
** See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Adult Crafts
Jimmye Lou Thies
Contract Class Instructor -
* See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Dance
John Bishop
Contract Class Instructor -
• See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Martial Arts Classes
Kathy Breaux
Contract Class Instructor -
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Youth Art Classes
Kathy Salata
Contract Class Instructor -
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Public Speaking
Keep America Beautiful Inc
Recycling Promotional
Ability to provide promotional items made from recycled
Items
materials.
Keith Johnson Entertainment
D.J. Services
Price is equal to others, service is superior to others.
Ken's Ace Hardware
Misc. Supplies
Local vendor for repair materials and program supplies
Ki Chairs
Chairs for DBC/Parks
Quality chairs, good service and low prices
Kiddie Techie
Contract Class Instructor -
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Youth Computer
Kidz Love Soccer
Contract Class Instructor -
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Soccer
Kirk Steinke Electric
Electrician
Consistent low bidder and excellent work
Kustom Imprints
Coaches shirts - Adult B-
Traditionally lowest Price from bids.
ball Shirts
L.A. Data Security
Offsite Data Storage Svcs
Provides consistent, quality services at a reasonable cost.
Land's End
Staff shirts, apparel
Variety of quality products -- vendor has city artwork
Letter Perfect Signs
Park Signs
Provides consistent, quality services at a reasonable cost.
Page 5
Exhibit A
City of Diamond Bar
Approved Vendor List
Effective February 1, 2012 through January 31, 2013
Vendor Product Explanation
Lewis Engraving Engraving Svcs - Name Consistently provides good service in a timely manner.
Badges, Tiles & Plaques
Liberty World Class Flags Park Flags Lowest price from bids and meets all requirements
Lighting Resources, LLC Waste Recycling Vendor Only local vendor that doesn't have a pick up charge.
Live Sound Concepts
Concert/July 4th -Audio
Lowest price for concerts, snowiest & b -day party for 3
Equipment
years.
Lowe's Home Imprvmt Center
Misc. Supplies
Local vendor for repair materials and program supplies
Mad Science
Contract Class Instructor -
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Youth Science
Magic and Variety
July 4th - Entertainment
Only vendor in area that has Uncle Sam & balloonist
available on 4th of July.
Marlene Ramirez -Mooney
Contract Class Instructor -
* See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Maya Devi
Contract Class Instructor -
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Restorative Yoga
MCO -The Microfilm Co
Specialized Microfiche
Provides timely specialized service.
Maint
MDS
Battery & Light Bulb
Lowest collection prices.
Recycling
Merchants Building Maint.
Window washers
Consistently low bids
Minutman Press (R & D
Copying/Printing
Able to provide same day service at low cost. Often as
Blueprint)
low bidder.
Light Weight and Durable
Low bidder for tables and chairs at DBC, Pantera and
Mity-Lite Furniture
Tables/Chairs
Heritage; excellent service and warranty program;
products match existing inventory
Moonlight Printers
Printing Svcs
Provides timely service.
Mt. Calvary Lutheran Church
Rental Facility - Contract
Classes & Sports
Facility Use Agreement signed annually.
Music N Smart
Contract Class Instructor -
** See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Piano & Violin
NET Easter Eggs
Easter Eggs
Lowest price and only vendor that meets our
requirements.
Newhall Ice
Snow for Winter Snow
Only vendor that responds to bids, that can provide
Fest
requirements
Oak Tree Lanes
Contract Class Instructor -
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Bowling
Once Upon A Time Creations
Caterer
Provides specialty menu items at competitive prices
Page 6
Exhibit A
City of Diamond Bar
Approved Vendor List
Effective February 1, 2012 through January 31, 2013
Vendor
Product
Explanation
Specialty Supplies for
Responsive vendor with specialty supplies needed for
Oriental Trading Co.
recreation programs &
events
programs
Gopher/ground squirrel
Orkin Pest Control, Inc.
eradication - Parks & LLA
Responsive vendor for on-going rodent control service
Districts
Partition Specialties PSI
Wall Partitions DBC
Original Installers familiar with proprietary systems
Electronic Components
Meets product requirements, provides low prices and fast
PC Mall Gov, Inc.
and Equipment
delivery
Peter Rogers Photography
Photography Services
Vendor continues to provide high quality photos at
reasonable cost. Originally selected through RFP process
Playwell Teknologies
Contract Class Instructor-
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Youth Enrichment
Pomona Unified School Distr.
Rental Facility - Contract
Facility Use Agreement signed August 1997
Classes & Sports
PROforma/Element 7
Recycling Promotional
Ability to provide promotional items made from recycled
Items
materials.
Proforma Unisource
Promotional Materials for
Often a low bidder providing quality, timely merchandise,
City Programs & Events
and has artwork on file for a variety of items
Protection One
Fire & Burglary alarm
Company took over monitoring of alarm systems @ DBC
service/maint.
and Heritage Park
PYRO Spectaculars
July 4th - Fireworks
Only vendor to respond for the last five years
Pyro-Comm Systems
Fire alarm service/maint.
Proprietary fire systems for DBC and Heritage Park
Quinn Rental Services
Equipment Rental
Quality equipment, great service, competitive prices
Rae Duncan
Contract Class Instructor -
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Adult Crafts
Raquel Hernandez
Contract Class Instructor -
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Youth Math
Recy-cal
Recycling containers for
Consistently low prices
schools
Red Dragon Karate
Contract Class Instructor -
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Martial Arts
Printing - Envelopes,
Consistently provides good service in a timely manner.
Reinberger Printwerks, Inc.
Letterhead, Stationery,
Vendor has many templates already on file
Certificate Covers etc
Related Visual, Inc.
Audio/VisualConsistently
low bidder. Also provides maintenance
support for equipment
Rishi Kumar
Contract Class Instructor -
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Growing Your Own Food
Page 7
Exhibit A
City of Diamond Bar
Approved Vendor List
Effective February 1, 2012 through January 31, 2013
Vendor
Product
Explanation
Rod Ertel
Contract Class Instructor -
* See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Intro to Excel
Roto Rooter
Emergency Plumbing
Responsive to emergencies, competitive prices
Royal Roofing
Inspection & Repair of
Provides quality work for a reasonable cost and responds
DBC Roof
in a timely manner
Safeway Signs Co.
Traffic Signs
Manufacturer of City street name signs, ability to provide
matching signs
SASE Company Inc
Sidewalk Grinders & Parts
Sole manufacturer which meets all equipment
requirements
SC Signs
Traffic Signs & Poles
Traditionally been low bidder and ability to provide
supplies in a timely manner
School Specialty, Inc.
Tiny Tots & Day Camp
Responsive vendor with specialty supplies needed for
Supplies
programs
Shannon Griffiths
Contract Class Instructor-
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Belly Dance
Sheri Liebe
Contract Class Instructor -
* See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Youth Dance
Sign Contractor, Inc.
Armed Forces Banners
Lowest Bidder -- now has artwork for future orders.
Simpson Advertising, Inc.
Graphic Design
Continues to provide graphic design support. Selected
through RFP process
Skyhawks
Contract Class Instructor -
* See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Youth Basketball
Smart & Final
Food, Rest. Supp.
Good prices, specialized products for City events
So Cal Sanitation
Special Event -
Vendor has provided great customer service for the past
Restrooms & Sinks
4 years
Southern California Boiler
Boiler Maintenance
Responsive service and competitive prices
Southwest Sales
T- Shirt Printing
Consistent low bidder, provides quality and timely service
and is a Diamond Bar Vendor
Sparkletts Water
Water Supplies &
Consistently provides good service
Equipment Rental
Sport Pins International, Inc.
Pins
Consistently low bidder
Star Auto Service
Vehicle Maintenance
Provides quality and timely service at competitive prices
Steven Yuan
Contract Class Instructor-
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Skateboarding
Stitches Uniforms
Staff Uniforms
Lowest price for Birthday shirts 3 years in a row
Stubbies Promotions
Promo Items
Often a low bidder providing quality, timely merchandise.
Has artwork on file for a varietv of items
Subway Meeting Supplies Consistently provides good service in a timely manner
Surendra Mehta Contract Class Instructor - * See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Yoga/Wellness
Page 8
Exhibit A
City of Diamond Bar
Approved Vendor List
Effective February 1, 2012 through January 31, 2013
Vendor
Product
Explanation
Tennis Anyone
Contract Class Instructor -
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Tennis
The Whole Enchilada
Meeting Supplies
Consistently provides good service in a timely manner
including delivery
Tim Smith
Contract Class Instructor -
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Guitar
Tina Chang
Contract Class Instructor -
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Dance & Martial Arts
Event banners, flyers,
Consistent low bidder, provides quality and timely service
The Sauce Creative Services
apparel & promotional
and has artwork on file for a variety of items
items
Contract Class Instructor -
Theresa Winecki
Adult Fitness (Bootcamp,
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Zumba
Tony Wang
Contract Class Instructor -
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Adult Computer
Traffic Control Service
Traffic Signs & Poles
Traditionally been low bidder and ability to provide
supplies in a timely manner
Traffic Operations Inc
Street Striping
Most responsive supplier for low quantity orders
Trane
HVAC Controls
Proprietary controls at the DBC and Heritage Community
centers
Trench Plate Rental Co
Steel Plates & K -Rails
Responds to after hours emergency services
Rental
Tri -City Pools
DBC Fountain service
Lowest bidder, familiar with City equipment
TriFytt Sports
Youth Sports Contract
See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Class
United Pumping Services Inc
Hazardous Waste
Only local vendor for hazardous waste clean ups
Removal
Valley Trophy
Youth Trophies
Traditionally lowest Price from bids
Vidiflow
Audio/Visual
Original Installers familiar with proprietary systems
VIS
Backflow testing
Quality service and competitive prices
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
Specialty Supplies
Local vendor with specialty repair materials
Walnut Hills Fire Protection
Fire extinguisher repair
Familiar with City equipment, great service
Walnut My Unified Schl Distr.
Rental Facility - Contract
Facility Use Agreement signed September 1992
Classes & Sports
Waxie Sanitary Supply
Janitorial supplies
Competitive pricing, offers periodic training
WellDune Rx
Sharps recycling svcs.
Vendor works with Waste Management
Weisenbach Recycled Products
Recycling Promotional Items
Ability to provide a wide variety of promotional items made
from recycled materials
Page 9
Exhibit A
City of Diamond Bar
Approved Vendor List
Effective February 1, 2012 through January 31, 2013
Vendor Product Explanation
White Cap Road Maint Materials & Only local vendor specialized in street construction
Equipment materials
World Wide Bingo Bingo supplier Lowest price in 3 years of bidding and great service
Yosemite Water Water Supplies & Responsive supplier for low quantity orders
Equipment Rental
Young Rembrandts Contract Class Instructor - * See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Youth Art Classes
Young S. Kim Contract Class Instructor - See Contract Class Instructor Explanation
Youth Taekwondo
**Instructor meets the requirements of the contract class program: successful completion of instructor application,
supplemental questionnaire, class proposals, background check and quarterly quality review of classes.
Page 10
Agenda # 6 . 4
Meeting Date: March 20, 2012
CITY COUNCIL0- AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: James DeStefano, City Man
TITLE: Authorize purchase of electronic` equipment and other devices for the
Diamond Bar Library in an amount not to exceed $150,000 and
appropriate the necessary funds from General Fund Reserves
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve
FINANCIAL SUMMARY:
The City shall be reimbursed all costs associated with this purchase by County of Los
Angeles Public Library.
BACKGROUND:
The City has partnered with County of Los Angeles and Supervisor Knabe to construct
a new public library on the first floor of City Hall. The new, approximately 22,000 sq. ft.,
facility is on schedule to open this summer.
The City has agreed to manage the construction, purchase the necessary equipment,
and provide space for the new library. The County has agreed to pay all costs
associated with the construction, furnishing and operating the new library.
DISCUSSION:
In order to operate the new facility, new electronic equipment such as desktop
computers, peripherals, and other electronic devices need to be purchased and
installed for use by Library staff and the public. If approved, staff will purchase these
items through a Los Angeles County purchasing agreements, competitive bid process,
or other authorized purchasing agreements.
PREPARED BY:
I
David Doyle
Assistant City Manager
Attachment — List of electronic items to be purchased
3/1/2012
DIAMOND BAR LIBRARY
NEW TENANT IMPROVEMENT
COMPUTER EQUIPMENT COSTS
TO INCLUDE LAPTOP FOR MEETING ROOM
QTY
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT TOTAL
43 EA
COMPUTER - SMALL FORM FACTOR DESKTOP
$ 731.00 $ 31,433.00
CONFIGURATION 3
DELL OPTIPLEX 790
- Quad core Intel Core i5-2400 3.10GHz processor
- 4GB RAM
- 250GB SATA hard disk
- integrated Intel HD Graphics 2000 video
- 10/100/1000 Gigabit Ethernet
- 4 year NBD onsite warranty
- Windows XP Professional
43 EA
UPGRADE DVD DRIVE FOR SMALL FORM FACTOR
$ 8.32 $ 357.76
CONFIGURATION 2
Removable Storage:
internal 16X DVD+/-RW,SATA
COMPUTER WARRANTY 1 YR ADDITIONAL
$ 37.44 $ 1,609.92
FOR CONFIGURATION 3 SMALL FORM FACTOR
r11143EA
EA
MONITOR - PrivateVue Monitor with Ruggedized
$ 377.00 $ 4,147.00
Privacy Glass on NEC 19" Widescreen Monitor
Mfg. Part#PVM-191WN
11 EA
CA Recycling Fee for 15' to 34.99" Screens
$ 8.00 $ 88.00
32 EA
MONITOR
$ 161.20 $ 5,158.40
19" WIDE CONFIGURATION #1
VIEWSONIC
VG1932WM-LED
32 EA
ICA Recycling Fee for 15' to 34.99 Screens
$ 8.00 $ 256.00
QTY
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT TOTAL
43
EA KEYBOARD- 104 key enhanced, with three Windows
$ 16.75 $ 720.25
keys, USB cable included
three year warranty
Ke tronics E06101U2, black USB keyboard
Ke tronics#E06101U2
6
EA Lenovo ThinkCentre M90z (avaiable via En Pointe)
$1,251.00 $ 7,506.00
Not on County Master agreement
Processor: Intel Core i5-650 processor, 3.20Ghz, 4M Cache
Operating System: Genuine Windows 7 Professional 64
Form Factor: 23 -inch AIO 150W 85%Plus/ Intel Q57 Planar / Non Touch w/0 camera
System Stand: Height adjustment stand
IMemory speed: PC3-10600 1333 MHz DDR3 SoDIMM
Total Memory: 4GB PC3-10600 SDRAM (1DIMM)
Hard drive: SATA 250GB 7200RPM/3Gb/8M
Memory card reader: 6 in 1 Card Reader
Optical Device: SATA - Slim ODD Multi -Burner
Networking: Integrated Enet 10-1000 - Intel Pro 1000T Gigabit
WIFI wireless LAN adapters: Intel Centrino Wireless - N 1000
Keyboard: Lenovo USB Preferred Pro Full Size - US English
Pointing device: Lenovo Optical Wheel Mouse - USB Primax 400 DPI
Speakers: Internal Speaker
Chassis intrusion switch: C2 Chassis Intrusion switch w/ cable kit
6
EA AWE Early Literacy Stations
$3,821.00 $ 22,926.00
Early Literacy Station Bilingual Spanish Educational Discount
California State Recycling Fee
2 Year Warranty Extension
Audio Y -splitter Cable, 6"
Shipping
30
EA I Koss Educational Headphones and
$ 363.00 $ 10,890.00
New Release ELF Licensing - Prepay
56
EA SURGE PROTECTOR- 6 outlet (NEMA 5-15R)
$ 17.00 $ 952.00
10 foot power cord, 2.48" w x 12.24"1 x 1.5"h, grey
APC Essential Sur eArrest, 6 outlet
APC #P6M10
7
JEA PRINTER --LG WORKGROUP B/W LASER (LEGAL)
$ 1,185.53 $ 8,298.71
CONFIGURATION #3
HEWLETT PACKARD
LASERJET P4015X
- 52 pages per minute, black and whtie
- 1200x1200 dpi
- 128MB RAM
- two 500 sheet paper trays
supports PCL6, PCI -5e, Postscript Level 3
- USB 2.0 and Gigabit Ethernet
- 1 year NBD onsite warrant
7
EA MEMORY - 512MB MEMORY UPGRADE FOR LASERJET
$ 504.00 $ 3,528.00
P4015X PRINTER
7
EA 4 YEAR ADDITIONAL WARRANTY NBD ONSITE
$ 398.83 $ 2,791.81
FOR LASERJET P4015X PRINTER
QTY IDESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
TOTAL
14 EA
PRINTER- HP DESKJET 6940 COLOR INKJET
$ 95.00
$
1,330.00
1 EA
PRINTER- HP PHOTOSMART PREMIUM ALL -IN -ONE
$ 200.00
$
200.00
C310A, color inkjet, 600dpi, prints, copies, scans.
scanner: 8.5"x 11" flatbed, USB 2.0, includes USB cable
1 EA
DELL XPS 15 with:
$ 1,750.00
$
1,750.00
- 15.6" 1366 x 768 LED display
- Quad core i7 2.40GHz 2760QM processor
-4GB RAM
- 750GB hard disk
- Blu-ray reader/DVD burner drive
- nVidia GeForce GT 525M w/1 GB RAM
- integrated JBL 2.1 speakers
- Intel Wireless -N 1000 adapter
- 6 cell battery
- Gigabit Ethernet
- 64 bit Windows 7 Professional
1 EA
CA Recycling Fee for 15" to 34.99 Screens
$ 8.00
$
8.00
14 EA
BAR CODE SCANNER- HONEYWELL MS9540 VOYAGER
$ 120.00
$
1,680.00
HAND-HELD BAR CODE READER,
kit includes cable and stand
1 EA
PRINTER- EPSON TM-T88V THERMAL RECEIPT PRINTER
$ 339.00
$
339.00
- built-in USB and Fast Ethernet ports
- includes AC power adapter and cable
3 EA
3M model 943 staff bookcheck unit w/ integrated barcode scanners
$9,461.00
$
28,383.00
w/ 1 year service agreement
1 EA
Xbox Plus Kinect Bundle gaming system
$ 400.00
$
400.00
1 EA
WII Gaming System
$ 200.00
$
200.00
1 EA
subtotal
$ 134,952.85
sales tax
$
11,808.37
total
$ 146,761.22
Distribution Notes:
DIAMOND BAR LIBRARY
CITY COUNCIL
Agenda # 6 .5
Meeting Date: July 5, 2011
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: James DeStefano, City Manda
TITLE: Authorize Increase to ContraC\ct wit Woodcliff Construction in an amount
not to exceed $150,000 for a total contract authorization of $6,218,616 for
construction of City Hall and Library
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve
FINANCIAL SUMMARY:
There are sufficient funds available for this expenditure in the FY 2011-12 budget.
DISCUSSION:
In July 2011 the Council approved a contract with Woodcliff Construction Inc. for
construction of City Hall and the Library. The total authorization of that contract was
$6,068,616. Since that time the City Hall project has concluded and opened to the
public. The Library, however, is still under construction and scheduled to open July
2012.
The Library has nearly exhausted its original contingency budget of approximately
$450,000. The bulk of these funds were utilized to construct the Reading Garden which
was not part of the original bid, additional required work related to the Friend's
Bookstore, and other miscellaneous work related to Fire Sprinkler and HVAC systems.
Since the Library is only 50% complete at this time, it is likely that additional change
order work will be required to complete construction. In addition, the Friend's of
Diamond Bar Library have stated that they will be donating up to $80,000 to the new
library. It is anticipated that at a minimum of $50,000 will be spent on construction and
be paid to Woodcliff Construction. Therefore, the Friends donation and the increase in
contingency funding requires Council approval to increase the overall contract
authorization from $$6,068,616 to $6,261,616.
Los Angeles County Public Library has agreed to reimburse the City for all construction
costs associated with this project.
PREPARED BY:
David oy
Assistant City Manager
CITY COUNCIL
Agenda # 8.1
Meeting Date: March 20, 2012
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: James DeStefano, City Man
TITLE: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 012 -XX ADOPTING NEGATIVE
DECLARATION NO. PL 2012-08 FORA PROPOSED OFF -LEASH
DOG PARK AT PANTERA PARK, 738 PANTERA DRIVE
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the Resolution.
BACKGROUND:
The City has initiated planning efforts to construct a 1.35 -acre off -leash dog park on a portion
of Pantera Park. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an
"Initial Study" was prepared to evaluate potential adverse environmental effects associated
with the proposed project.
The Initial Study concluded that any such impacts associated with the proposed dog park
would be less than significant. When such a conclusion is reached, CEQA requires the
applicable public agency to prepare and publish a "Negative Declaration," an environmental
document formalizing the finding that no significant impacts will result from implementation of
the proposed project.
Staff released the Initial Study, together with a Notice of intent to adopt a Negative
Declaration, for a mandatory 20 -day public review period in early February. Now that the
public review period has closed, the City Council may now consider adopting the Negative
Declaration. Copies of the Initial Study and draft Negative Declaration are provided in
Attachment 2.
Project Summary
Pantera Park is 23 acres in total area. Current amenities include lighted basketball courts,
lighted softball fields, community building, picnic tables, soccer field overlay, lighted tennis
courts, tot lot, restrooms, batting cages, concession stand, paved walking trail, and 166
parking spaces, which include six accessible stalls. These facilities occupy 15.5 acres, while
the remaining 7.5 acres consist of slopes and fallow land.
The proposed dog park site will be developed on 1.35 acres of rough graded land within the
undeveloped portion of Pantera Park. Planned amenities for the dog park consist of two
fenced enclosures where dogs will be allowed off -leash: a 39,400 square -foot (0.9 -acre) area
for large dogs over 25 pounds, and a 19,400 square -foot (0.4 -acre) area for small dogs under
25 pounds. The enclosures will be surrounded by a six-foot high chain link fence with self-
closing double gate entrances and exits to each area. The ground will be covered with six -
inches of compacted wood fiber. Access to each area from the adjacent parking lot will be
provided via an ADA accessible concrete walkway.
Other amenities planned for the site include:
• ADA accessible drinking fountain with pet bowl
• Hose bibs for additional water access
• Trash receptacles
• Park benches
• ADA Accessible walkway leading to trail
• Doggie walk bags in each enclosure for clean-up by pet owners
2
The dog park will be open 30 minutes before sunrise to 30 minutes after sunset, to be
consistent with the hours of operation with other parks in the City. In addition, the proposed
dog park is within an existing park. The gates to the dog park will be locked at closing time by
City maintenance staff.
DISCUSSION:
The Initial Study assessed the extent to which the proposed dog park would generate
impacts in 17 environmental categories, including water quality, air quality, noise, biological
resources and traffic. The outcome of this analysis was that the environmental impacts
generated, if any, would be insignificant. Based on these findings, staff published, along with
the Initial Study, a Notice of Intent to adopt a Negative Declaration, which was available for
public review and comment for a CEQA-mandated 20 -day period.
Public Review/Response to Public Comments:
Public Review Period
On February 3, 2012, the City published a Notice of Availability and Intent to Adopt the
Negative Declaration within the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin and the San Gabriel Valley
Tribune. Notices were mailed to residents and property owners within a 1,000 -foot radius of
the project site. Notices were posted upon the project site and at community designated
posting sites. The Initial Study and Negative Declaration have been distributed to affected
public agencies, the City's website, and placed within the Library and at City Hall for public
review. The public review and comment period closed on February 22, 2012.
Comments Received
The only public comments received in response to this notice were in regards to the
proposed compacted wood fiber surface proposed for the park, and a preference for turf.
The comments are based on concerns that the wood fiber would be an unsuitable surface for
the dogs
This issue does not fall into the classification of an environmental impact under CEQA.
CEQA does not concern itself with how a project will impact its end users, but how the project
will affect the environment. For example, the Initial Study analyzed how the proposed dog
park would affect the community in terms of generating additional noise, traffic, airborne
pollutants, and so forth. The issue of bark chips versus turf does fall within this realm, but is
instead an issue of the costs associated with maintaining 1.35 acres of lawn
3
CONCLUSION:
The Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with CEQA to identify the
environmental impacts associated with the construction of a dog park located at Pantera
Park. No changes or mitigation measures have been made to the project. No new
environmental issues have been raised as a result of the comments received from agencies,
organizations or individuals.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution (Attachment 1) to
approve the Initial Study/Negative Declaration for the dog park at Pantera Park, subject to
conditions of approval as listed within the draft resolution.
Prepared by:
If®raNY-7.,� ,,. /
- Tobo75
Planning Technician
Reviewed by:
David Doyle
Assistant City Manager
Attachments:
R viewed by:
e 7A
Greg Gubman, AICP
Community Development Director
1. Draft Resolution No. 2012 -XX
2. Initial Study/Negative Declaration for the Dog Park at Pantera Park
4
ATTACHMENT
RESOLUTION NO. 2012 -XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
DIAMOND BAR ADOPTING NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO.
PL 2012-087 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A DOG PARK ON
1.35 ACRES OF UNIMPROVED LAND WITHIN PANTERA PARK,
738 PANTERA DRIVE.
A. RECITALS.
(i) The City of Diamond Bar proposes development of a 1.35 -acre dog park
located within Pantera Park (the "Project" hereinafter.)
(ii) In accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality
Act, Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et. seq. ("CEQA"), the State
CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14,
Sections 15000 et. Seq., the City prepared an Initial Study and Negative
Declaration dated February 1, 2012, (the "IS/ND") to analyze the proposed
Project.
(iii) On February 3, 2012, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines
Section 15072, 15073, 21091 and 21092 a Notice of Availability and Intent
to Adopt a Negative Declaration was published within the Inland Valley
Daily Bulletin and the San Gabriel Valley Daily Tribune. In addition, on
February 3, 2012, copies of the Notice were posted on-site and at
community designated posting sites. Notices were mailed to residents
and property owners within a 1,000 -foot radius of the project site.
(iv) A public review period for the proposed IS/ND was provided from
February 3, 2012 through February 22, 2012. Copies of the proposed
IS/ND were made available for public review at the Diamond Bar Library,
City Hall, and the City's website.
(v) In accordance with CEQA Guidelines, the IS/ND was circulated to
interested parties and agencies for public comment. In response to the
circulation of the IS/ND, the City received written and oral comments
regarding the adequacy of the IS/ND. The City caused preparation of
written responses where required to all comments which raised project
related environmental issues. The City has incorporated the comments
and responses into the ND where appropriate.
(vi) On March 20, 2012 the City Council held a duly noticed public meeting on
the IS/ND. At the meeting, interested parties were provided an
opportunity to present oral and written comments regarding the IS/ND. On
March 20, 2012, the City Council concluded the public meeting.
B. RESOLUTION.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the City
Council of the City of Diamond Bar, as follows:
1. The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in
the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The City Council finds and determines that the public and governmental
agencies have been afforded ample notice and opportunity to comment on
the IS/ND.
3. In accordance with CEQA, the City Council finds and determines that the
IS/ND has been independently analyzed by the City and its staff, and that
the IS/ND represents the independent judgment of the lead agency with
respect to the Project.
4. The Project will not result in significant impacts to the environment; that
said IS/ND is adequate to serve as the required environmental
documentation for the Project based on the finding that the documents
reflect the independent judgment of the lead agency; that it has
considered the IS/ND with any comments and responses received during
the public review and meeting process; and further finding on the basis of
said documents that there is no substantial evidence that the Project will
have a significant effect on the environment.
5. The City Council, after due inspection, investigation and study made by
itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and
reports offered at said meetings determined that the IS/ND was prepared
in compliance with the requirements of California Environmental Quality
Act and State CEQA Guidelines.
6. The City Council approves and adopts the IS/ND for the proposed Project,
attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference as the
environmental documentation for the Project.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 20th DAY OF MARCH 2012, BY THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DIAMOND BAR.
0
Ling Ling Chang, Mayor
2
I, Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk of the City of Diamond Bar, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted by the City Council of
the City of Diamond Bar, at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 20th day of
March 2012, by the following vote:
AYES: Council Member:
NOES: Council Member:
ABSTAIN: Council Member:
ABSENT: Council Member:
ATTEST:
Tommye Cribbins, City Clerk
City of Diamond Bar
ATTACHMENT 2
Aov
NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY AND
INTENT TO ADOPT NEGATIVE DECLARATION
City of Diamond Bar, 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 (909) 839-7030
NOTICE: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA": Public
Resources Code, Section 21100 et seq.), the City of Diamond Bar has determined that the
project referenced herein will not have a significant effect on the environment. A draft
Negative Declaration has been prepared for review and approval in connection with the
proposed project.
PROJECT TITLE: Dog Park at Pantera Park
PROJECT ADDRESS: 738 Pantera Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The City is proposing a dog park on 1.35 acres of unimproved land
within Pantera Park, an existing 23 -acre public sports park. The dog park will consist of two
enclosures where dogs will be allowed off -leash: a 39,000 square -foot area for large dogs over 25
pounds; and a 19,400 square -foot area for small dogs under 25 pounds. The dog park will be open
30 minutes before sunrise to 30 minutes after sunset seven days per week. The property is zoned
Low Density Residential (RL) with an underlying General Plan land use designation of Park.
PROPERTY OWNER: City of Diamond Bar, 21810 Copley Dr., Diamond Bar, CA 91765
APPLICANT: City of Diamond Bar, Community Services Department, 21810 Copley Dr., Diamond
Bar, CA 91765
Environmental Determination: In accordance with CEQA Section 15070, the City prepared a
Negative Declaration for this project. Pursuant to CEQA Section 15105, the public review period for
the Negative Declaration begins February 3, 2012, and ends February 22, 2012. The Diamond Bar
City Council will consider whether or not to adopt the proposed Negative Declaration at the following
regularly scheduled meeting:
TIME OF MEETING: 6:30 p.m.
DATE OF PUBLIC MEETING: Tuesday, March 20, 2012
LOCATION: South Coast Air Quality Management District/
Government Center Auditorium
21865 Copley Drive
Diamond Bar. California 91765
Copies of the Initial Study, documenting the reasons to support the finding that said project would
not have a significant effect on the environment, are available for review between the hours of 7:30
a.m. and 5:30 p.m. Monday through Thursday and 7:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on Friday, at the following
locations:
• City of Diamond Bar, Community Development Department/Planning Division, 21810 Copley
Drive, Diamond Bar, CA
Diamond Bar Library, 1061 Grand Avenue, Diamond Bar, CA, and
The City of Diamond Bar's website at www.DiamondBarCA.gov
ComDev/Dog Park at Pantera Park/Notice of Intent
CITY OF DIAMOND BAR - 21810 COPLEY DRIVE - DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 - TEL. (909) 839-7030 - FAX (909) 861-3117
1. Project title: Dog Park at Pantera Park
2. Lead agency name and address: City of Diamond Bar, 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond
Bar, CA, 91765
3. Contact person and phone number: Natalie Tobon, Planning Technician, 909839-7034
4. Project location: 738 Pantera Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765
5. Project sponsor's name and address: City of Diamond Bar, 21810 Copley Drive,
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
6. General Plan Designation: Park
7. Zoning: Low Density Residential (RL)
8. Description of project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later
phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off-site features necessary for its
implementation, Attach additional sheets if necessary)
The project site is within Pantera Park, an existing 23 -acre park located at 738 Pantera
Drive, where 15.5 acres are developed and 7.5 acres are undeveloped. The project site is
located in 1.35 acres of the undeveloped land on a rough graded pad.
Current amenities at the existing park include lighted basketball courts, lighted softball
fields, community building, picnic tables, soccer field overlay, lighted tennis courts, tot
lot, restrooms, batting cages, concession stand, paved walking trail, and 166 parking
spaces, which include six accessible stalls.
r ! ! ! ,_ ,•
NOW
area for small dogs under 25 pounds. The enclosures will be surrounded by a six -f
• • ! • • l - ! - • t
ground will be covered with six -inches of wood fiber (similar to wooden chips that C
used for playgrounds). Access to each area from the adjacent parking lot will be provid
via a A,♦ accessible concrete walkway. i
Other amenities planned for the site include:
® ADA accessible drinking fountain with pet bowl
• Hose bibs for additional water access
® Trash receptacles
® Park benches
® ADA Accessible walkway leading to trail
® Doggie walk bags in each enclosure for clean-up by pet owners
The dog park will be open 30 minutesbefore r
minutes after sunset, to be
consistent with the hours of operation with other parks
proposed dog park is within an existing park. The gates to the dog park will be locked at
closing time
9. Surrounding land uses and setting: (Briefly describe the project's surroundings)
North: Pantera Park in RL (Low Density Residential) zone.
South: Undeveloped park area and Single -Family Residential in RL (Low Density Residential) zone
located approximately 400 feet to the south.
West: Pantera Elementary School in RL (Low Density Residential) zone.
East: Undeveloped hillside in RL (Low Density Residential) zone.
Page 2
10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation
agreement): None
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least
one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact' as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
Aesthetics
Agricultural Resources
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Geology/Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hazards & Hazardous Materials
Hydrology/Water Quality
Land Use/Planning
Mineral Resources
Noise
Population/Housing
Public Services
Recreation
Transportation/Traffic
Utilities/Service Systems
Mandatory Findings of
ment pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on
Significance
DETERMINATION: (To be completed
by the Lead Agency)
st analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
Prepared By:
Signature: '�(,�( ° (),
Printed Natalie Tobon,
Name: Planning Technician
Approved for Publicatio
Greg GUbman, AICP,
Community Development Director
Date: February 1, 2012
For: City of Diamond Bar
Date: February 1, 2012
Page 3
the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE
ARATION will be prepared.
that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a
icant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project
nent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
monlythat
that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL
CT REPORT is required.
that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact' or "potentially significant unless
ated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier
ment pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on
arlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but
st analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all
potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION
pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or
NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed
project, nothing further is required.
Prepared By:
Signature: '�(,�( ° (),
Printed Natalie Tobon,
Name: Planning Technician
Approved for Publicatio
Greg GUbman, AICP,
Community Development Director
Date: February 1, 2012
For: City of Diamond Bar
Date: February 1, 2012
Page 3
1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact' answers that are adequately
supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A
"No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact
simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone).
A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general
standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project specific
screening analysis).
2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site,
cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational
impacts.
3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist
answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or
less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an
effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination
is made, an EIR is required.
4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the
incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from Potentially Significant Impact' to a "Less
than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how
they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier
Analyses," may be cross-referenced).
5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an
effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In
this case, a brief discussion should identify the following:
a.) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review.
b.) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the
scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal
standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on
the earlier analysis.
c.) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures
Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the
earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project.
6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for
potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside
document should, where appropriate, including a reference to the page or pages where the statement is
substantiated.
7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or
individuals contacted should be cited In the discussion.
8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead
agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's
environmental effects in whatever format is selected.
9) The explanation of each issue should identify:
a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and
b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance.
Page 4
Impact Discussion: The proposed project is located within an existing park and the adjacent area is
surrounded by undeveloped hillsides, Pantera Elementary School, and single-family residential homes
located 400 feet south of the project site. The project site was previously roughly graded. No earth
movement or structures are proposed that would block any scenic vistas. In addition, the project site is
located in a depressed grade where the tallest proposed structure is a six-foot high chain link fence.
Therefore, no impacts would occur.
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited
to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state
Potentially
X
scenic highway?
Potentially
Significant
Less than
No
Significant
Unless
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
ISSUES
Incorporated
I. AESTHETIC$. Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X
Impact Discussion: The proposed project is located within an existing park and the adjacent area is
surrounded by undeveloped hillsides, Pantera Elementary School, and single-family residential homes
located 400 feet south of the project site. The project site was previously roughly graded. No earth
movement or structures are proposed that would block any scenic vistas. In addition, the project site is
located in a depressed grade where the tallest proposed structure is a six-foot high chain link fence.
Therefore, no impacts would occur.
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited
to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state
X
scenic highway?
Impact Discussion: The project does not propose to cut down and trees or remove any features other than
ruderal grasses and a few shrubs in an already disturbed area. Therefore, no impacts would occur.
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the X
site and its surroundings?
Impact Discussion: The site is surrounded by undeveloped hillsides, Pantera Elementary School, and
single-family residential homes located 400 feet south of the project site. The site is an unimproved, highly
disturbed area within a developed community park and will be developed with a dog park to allow two off -leash
areas with regular oversight. Daily maintenance will be provided by the landscape maintenance contractor
under contract with the City. The contractor will provide the following services: emptying refuse cans;
cleaning park user amenities such as drinking fountain and benches, and removing fecal droppings, leaves,
and trash; and raking wood chips to ensure they remain evenly distributed. City staff will provide the
following maintenance services: Inspections on a weekly basis; re -supplying disposable plastic pick up
bags; repairing fencing and broken, bent, or weathered signs displaying rules; filling holes dug by dogs;
removing graffiti promptly; replenishing wood chips periodically; and spraying wood chips at least twice per
year with an enzyme -based disinfectant/deodorant to control odors. Therefore, the proposed project will
not degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surrounding.
d) Create anew source of substantial light or glare which would X
adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
Impact Discussion: No lighting is proposed. Therefore, no impacts would occur.
Page 5
ISSUES
Potentially
Potentially Significant
Significant Unless
Impact Nitigatlon
Incorporated
Less -than No
Significant Impact
Impact
Ii. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant
environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site
Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in
assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources,
including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information
compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Range Assessment project and the Forest Legacy
Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted
by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of
Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps X
prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring
Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural
use? _L
Impact Discussion: The project site is an unimproved, highly disturbed area within a developed community
park and is not designated as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance.
Project implementation would not result in the conversion of farmland to non-agricultural use. Therefore,
the proposed project would have no impacts to farmlands.
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson X
Act contract?
Impact Discussion: Implementation of the proposed project would not conflict with existing zoning for
agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract. Therefore, no impacts would result from the construction or
operation of the proposed project.
c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land
(as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)),
timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526),
X
or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by
Government Code Section 51104(8))?
Impact Discussion: The project site is an unimproved, highly disturbed area within a developed community
park and there are no forestland, timberland or timberland zoned Timberland Production uses that are
occurring on-site or in the immediate vicinity. Thus, the proposed project does not involve changes in the
existing environment that could conflict with existing zoning or cause of rezoning of forestland, timberland,
or timberland zoned Timberland Production.
d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to X
non -forest use?
Impact Discussion: The project site is an unimproved, highly disturbed area within a developed community
park and there are no forest land uses that are located on-site or in the immediate vicinity. Thus, the
proposed project does not involve changes in the existing environment that could result in loss of forest
land or conversion of forest land to non -forest use.
_F1
e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to
their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to X
non-agricultural use?
Page 6
Impact Discussion: The project site is an unimproved, highly disturbed area within a developed community
park and there are no farmland uses that are located on-site or in the immediate vicinity. Thus, the
proposed project does not involve changes in the existing environment that could result in conversion of
Farmland to non-agricultural uses.
Impact Discussion for a -d: The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) has developed
the Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology to assist public agencies to determine whether or
not a project may generate significant adverse localized air quality impacts for projects that are less than or
equal to five acres. The project would not generate significant adverse localized air impacts because the
total area of the project site is 1.35 acres.
It is not yet known how heavily the proposed dog park will be used, so it would be speculative to estimate
vehicle trip generation for the purposes of assessing air impacts resulting from mobile source
(i.e., vehicular) emissions. A heavily used dog park in Huntington Beach, located at Talbert Avenue and
Edwards Street, and approximately the same size as the proposed dog park, was used to approximate
potential worst-case air quality and traffic impacts. The Huntington Beach facility generates approximately
400 vehicle trips on a Saturday, which is a weekend peak day. It is likely that that this park is more
intensively used than the proposed Diamond Bar facility because it is located near higher density housing
(where the homes have very small private yard areas) than the neighborhoods that surround Pantera Park.
As such, it is reasonable to conclude that the proposed dog park will be less intensively used and will
generate fewer vehicle trips than the Huntington Beach facility does. For purpose of this analysis, in a very
rare event where there is heavy usage of the proposed dog park, 400 vehicles trips would not result in a
significant air quality impact.
Construction activities are minimal with minimal grading to install the ADA accessible pathway to the dog
park. Therefore, dust generation and construction vehicle emissions would be negligible.
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of
Potentially
X
people?
Potentially
Significant
Less than
No
Significant
Unless
Significant
Impact
I�$�E$
Impact
Mitigation
Incorporated
Impact
Ill. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significant criteria established by the applicable air quality
management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations.
Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air
X
quality plan?
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an
X
existing or projected air quality violation?
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria
pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an
applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including
X
releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for
ozone precursors)?
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
X
concentrations?
Impact Discussion for a -d: The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) has developed
the Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology to assist public agencies to determine whether or
not a project may generate significant adverse localized air quality impacts for projects that are less than or
equal to five acres. The project would not generate significant adverse localized air impacts because the
total area of the project site is 1.35 acres.
It is not yet known how heavily the proposed dog park will be used, so it would be speculative to estimate
vehicle trip generation for the purposes of assessing air impacts resulting from mobile source
(i.e., vehicular) emissions. A heavily used dog park in Huntington Beach, located at Talbert Avenue and
Edwards Street, and approximately the same size as the proposed dog park, was used to approximate
potential worst-case air quality and traffic impacts. The Huntington Beach facility generates approximately
400 vehicle trips on a Saturday, which is a weekend peak day. It is likely that that this park is more
intensively used than the proposed Diamond Bar facility because it is located near higher density housing
(where the homes have very small private yard areas) than the neighborhoods that surround Pantera Park.
As such, it is reasonable to conclude that the proposed dog park will be less intensively used and will
generate fewer vehicle trips than the Huntington Beach facility does. For purpose of this analysis, in a very
rare event where there is heavy usage of the proposed dog park, 400 vehicles trips would not result in a
significant air quality impact.
Construction activities are minimal with minimal grading to install the ADA accessible pathway to the dog
park. Therefore, dust generation and construction vehicle emissions would be negligible.
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of
X
people?
Impact Discussion: Operation of the dog park may result in some objectionable odors due to dog
excrement; however, these odors would be limited to the immediate areas within the off -leash areas
(approximately 1.35 acres). Signs will be posted on-site stating that dog owners must clean up after their
Page 7
dog(s). Because dog owners would be required to properly dispose of dog fecal matter in the provided
receptacles, the amount of dog waste present on-site at any one time should not be enough to create
objectionable odors. In addition, daily maintenance contractors will be emptying refuse cans and removing
fecal droppings, leaves, and trash. Therefore, this impact is considered less than significant.
Potentially Significant Lessthan No
Significant Unless Significant Impact
Impact Mitigation Impact
ISSUES Incorporated
IV, BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through
habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate,
sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, X
policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish
and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
Impact Discussion: The project site is an unimproved, highly disturbed area within a developed community
park. There are no species that are identified as candidate, sensitive, or special status species are known to
exist in the local vicinity due to the urbanized conditions. The proposed project would not result in significant
adverse impact to Federal or State listed or other designated species. Therefore, no impacts would occur.
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other
sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans,
X
policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and
Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
Impact Discussion: As previously stated, the project site is an unimproved, highly disturbed area within a
developed community park. No riparian habitat or sensitive natural communities exist on-site. In addition,
no blueline streams are located within the project site. Therefore, no impacts would occur.
G) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands
as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but
X
not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.,) through direct
removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?
Impact Discussion: As previously stated, the project site is an unimproved, highly disturbed area within a
developed community park. There are no federally protected wetlands located at the existing park. In
addition, no blueline streams are located within the project site. Therefore, no impacts would occur.
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident
or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native
X
resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of
native wildlife nursery sites?
Impact Discussion: No migratory wildlife corridors or native wildlife nurseries exist in the project area.
Therefore, no impacts would occur.
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological X
resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
Impact Discussion: The project site is an unimproved, highly disturbed area within a developed community
park and does not include protected habitat. The proposed project does not conflict with any local policies
or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as tree preservation ordinance. The project would
meet the City's tree protection ordinance because there are no protected trees on the project site and the
project does not require any trees to be removed. Therefore, no impacts would occur.
Page 8
Impact Discussion: There are no adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation
Plans or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plans applicable to the project area.
Therefore, no impacts would occur.
Potentially
Potentially
Significant
Less than
No
Significant
Unless
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
ISSUES
Incorporated
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation
ause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a
Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved
istorical resource as defined in Section 15064.5?
X
local, re ional, or state habitat conservation plan?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an
Impact Discussion: There are no adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation
Plans or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plans applicable to the project area.
Therefore, no impacts would occur.
Impact Discussion: The project site is located in an unimproved area within an existing park. The
proposed project may have a significant adverse impact if it would cause a substantial adverse change in
the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. This
section of the CEQA Guidelines defines a historical resource as one listed in or eligible for listing in the
California Register of Historical Places (per state law), included in a local register of historical resources
(as defined by state law) or identified as significant in an historical resource survey (meeting the
requirements of state law) or determined by the lead agency (City of Diamond Bar) to be historically
significant or significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational,
social, political, military, or cultural annals of California, provided the determination is supported by
substantial evidence in light of the whole record. Generally, a resource shall be considered by the lead
agency to be "historically significant' if the resource meets the criteria for listing on the California Register
of Historical Places. In this case, the existing site is not listed in nor eligible for listing in the California
Register of Historical Places, not listed in a local registrar of historical resources or identified as significant
in an historical resource survey, nor has it been determined to be historically significant by the City
because it does not meet the criteria for listing on the California Register of Historical Places.
The project site has previously been roughly graded. There will only be minimal grading for the ADA
accessible walking. Improvements will be noninvasive. Any extant subsurface resources will remain
undisturbed. Therefore, it does not meet the definition of a historical resource contained in Section 15064.5
of the CEQA Guidelines and is therefore less than significant impact.
d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of X
formal cemeteries?
Impact Discussion: No known human remains occur on-site and due to the level of past disturbance, it is
not anticipated that human remains exist within the project site. There will be minimal grading at the site for
the ADA compliant walkway and possible minimal grading done for the entrance of the dog park.
Therefore, the impacts would be less than significant.
Page 9
Potentially
Potentially
Significant
Less than
No
Significant
Unless
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
ES
ncor orated
ULTURAL RESOURCE$. Would the project:
Fa);
ause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a
X
istorical resource as defined in Section 15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an
X
archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5?
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or
X
site or unique geologic feature?
Impact Discussion: The project site is located in an unimproved area within an existing park. The
proposed project may have a significant adverse impact if it would cause a substantial adverse change in
the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. This
section of the CEQA Guidelines defines a historical resource as one listed in or eligible for listing in the
California Register of Historical Places (per state law), included in a local register of historical resources
(as defined by state law) or identified as significant in an historical resource survey (meeting the
requirements of state law) or determined by the lead agency (City of Diamond Bar) to be historically
significant or significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational,
social, political, military, or cultural annals of California, provided the determination is supported by
substantial evidence in light of the whole record. Generally, a resource shall be considered by the lead
agency to be "historically significant' if the resource meets the criteria for listing on the California Register
of Historical Places. In this case, the existing site is not listed in nor eligible for listing in the California
Register of Historical Places, not listed in a local registrar of historical resources or identified as significant
in an historical resource survey, nor has it been determined to be historically significant by the City
because it does not meet the criteria for listing on the California Register of Historical Places.
The project site has previously been roughly graded. There will only be minimal grading for the ADA
accessible walking. Improvements will be noninvasive. Any extant subsurface resources will remain
undisturbed. Therefore, it does not meet the definition of a historical resource contained in Section 15064.5
of the CEQA Guidelines and is therefore less than significant impact.
d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of X
formal cemeteries?
Impact Discussion: No known human remains occur on-site and due to the level of past disturbance, it is
not anticipated that human remains exist within the project site. There will be minimal grading at the site for
the ADA compliant walkway and possible minimal grading done for the entrance of the dog park.
Therefore, the impacts would be less than significant.
Page 9
Impact Discussion: No active faults are known to traverse the project site and the project site is not
located within, or immediate adjacent to an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. Therefore, no impacts
related to fault proximity will occur as a result of the proposed project.
ii) Strong seismic ground shakin ? X
Impact Discussion: Southern California has numerous active and potentially active faults that could
produce strong ground shaking that could impact the project site. The City of Diamond Bar is in proximity
to the San Andreas and Sierra Madre Fault zone. However, there are no habitable structures proposed for
this project. Therefore, there would be no impacts.
iii) Seismic -related ground failure including liquefaction? I I I I X I
Impact Discussion: The project area is located within a portion of the City that is not subject to liquefaction.
In addition, no habitable structures are proposed for this project. Therefore, project implementation is not
anticipated to result in the exposure of people or structures to potential impacts related to seismic ground
failure or liquefaction. Therefore, no impacts would occur.
iv) Landslides? I I I I X I
Impact Discussion: The site is located outside known landslide areas. Project implementation would not
expose people or structures to landslides. In additi8on, no habitable structures are proposed for this
project. Therefore, no impacts would occur.
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X
Impact Discussion: The project site has been roughly graded. There will be additional minimal grading to
install the ADA accessible pathway to the dog park. Project implementation would not result in substantial
soil erosion or loss of topsoil, therefore no impact would occur in this regard.
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would
Potentially
become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result
Potentially
Significant
Less than
No
in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence,
Significant
Unless
Significant
Impact
liquefaction or collapse?
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
ISSUES
Incor orated
AND SOILS. Would the project:ose
people or structures to potential substantial adverse
cts, including the risk of loss, ini, in,, or death in inh in
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most
recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by
the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial
X
evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and
Geology Special Publication 42.
Impact Discussion: No active faults are known to traverse the project site and the project site is not
located within, or immediate adjacent to an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. Therefore, no impacts
related to fault proximity will occur as a result of the proposed project.
ii) Strong seismic ground shakin ? X
Impact Discussion: Southern California has numerous active and potentially active faults that could
produce strong ground shaking that could impact the project site. The City of Diamond Bar is in proximity
to the San Andreas and Sierra Madre Fault zone. However, there are no habitable structures proposed for
this project. Therefore, there would be no impacts.
iii) Seismic -related ground failure including liquefaction? I I I I X I
Impact Discussion: The project area is located within a portion of the City that is not subject to liquefaction.
In addition, no habitable structures are proposed for this project. Therefore, project implementation is not
anticipated to result in the exposure of people or structures to potential impacts related to seismic ground
failure or liquefaction. Therefore, no impacts would occur.
iv) Landslides? I I I I X I
Impact Discussion: The site is located outside known landslide areas. Project implementation would not
expose people or structures to landslides. In additi8on, no habitable structures are proposed for this
project. Therefore, no impacts would occur.
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X
Impact Discussion: The project site has been roughly graded. There will be additional minimal grading to
install the ADA accessible pathway to the dog park. Project implementation would not result in substantial
soil erosion or loss of topsoil, therefore no impact would occur in this regard.
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would
become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result
X
in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction or collapse?
Impact Discussion: The project site has not been identified as being located on a geologic unit or soil that
is unstable, and would not become unstable as a result of project implementation. In addition, no habitable
structures are proposed for this project. Therefore, no impacts would occur.
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 1804.2 of the
California Building Code (2007), creating substantial risks to life X
or property?
Page 10
Impact Discussion: The project site is not located on expansive soil. The existing pad where the dog park
is proposed will not be graded. In addition, no habitable structures are proposed for this project. Therefore,
potential impacts from expansive soils would be less than significant.
Impact Discussion: The project site is not located on unstable soil. No septic systems are proposed.
Therefore, there would be no impacts.
Potentially
Potentially Significant Less than No
Significant Unless Significant Impact
Fa)Gene
Impact locomorated itigation Impact
ENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project:
rate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly,X
a have a si significant impact on the environment?
Impact Discussion: Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions will not directly be generated by the proposed dog
park. The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) has developed the Final Localized
Significance Threshold Methodology to assist public agencies to determine whether or not a project may
generate significant adverse localized air quality impacts for projects that are less than or equal to five
acres. The project would not generate significant adverse localized air impacts because the total area of
the project site is 1.35 acres. The proposed dog park is expected to generate fewer than 400 vehicle trips
per day, which is not significant from a GHG standpoint.
There will be minimal grading on the project site for the ADA accessible walkway. Therefore, the impacts
would be less than significant.
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for X
the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?
Impact Discussion: The proposed project is not subject to any applicable plan, policy, or regulation
adopted for the purpose of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore, no impacts would occur.
Potentially Significant Less than No
Significant Unless Significant impact
Impact Mitlgation Impact
ISSUES Incorporated
VIII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment
through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous X
Impact Discussion: Operation of the proposed dog park would increase the amount of dog feces occurring
at the project site. Approximately 75 percent of feces is water, and the remaining 25 percent is composed
of undigested food residues, digestive secretions, and bacteria (both viable and dead). The pathogenic
nature of viable bacteria in dog fecal matter is a public health concern. Some of the pathogens known to
occur in dog feces can be transmitted to humans. Therefore, dog feces within a concentrated area have
the potential to result in a pollutant load and health hazard. Viable bacteria present in fecal matter is not
assimilated into plant material during the growth process as are nutrients and salts (also present in fecal
Page 11
Potentially
Potentially
Significant
Less than
No
Significant
Unless
Significant
Impact
Impact
Impact
ISSUES
In c�orgcrlon ated
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic
tanks of alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers
X
are not available for the disposal of waste water?
Impact Discussion: The project site is not located on unstable soil. No septic systems are proposed.
Therefore, there would be no impacts.
Potentially
Potentially Significant Less than No
Significant Unless Significant Impact
Fa)Gene
Impact locomorated itigation Impact
ENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project:
rate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly,X
a have a si significant impact on the environment?
Impact Discussion: Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions will not directly be generated by the proposed dog
park. The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) has developed the Final Localized
Significance Threshold Methodology to assist public agencies to determine whether or not a project may
generate significant adverse localized air quality impacts for projects that are less than or equal to five
acres. The project would not generate significant adverse localized air impacts because the total area of
the project site is 1.35 acres. The proposed dog park is expected to generate fewer than 400 vehicle trips
per day, which is not significant from a GHG standpoint.
There will be minimal grading on the project site for the ADA accessible walkway. Therefore, the impacts
would be less than significant.
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for X
the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?
Impact Discussion: The proposed project is not subject to any applicable plan, policy, or regulation
adopted for the purpose of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore, no impacts would occur.
Potentially Significant Less than No
Significant Unless Significant impact
Impact Mitlgation Impact
ISSUES Incorporated
VIII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment
through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous X
Impact Discussion: Operation of the proposed dog park would increase the amount of dog feces occurring
at the project site. Approximately 75 percent of feces is water, and the remaining 25 percent is composed
of undigested food residues, digestive secretions, and bacteria (both viable and dead). The pathogenic
nature of viable bacteria in dog fecal matter is a public health concern. Some of the pathogens known to
occur in dog feces can be transmitted to humans. Therefore, dog feces within a concentrated area have
the potential to result in a pollutant load and health hazard. Viable bacteria present in fecal matter is not
assimilated into plant material during the growth process as are nutrients and salts (also present in fecal
Page 11
matter); however, pathogens would be inactivated during relatively long residence times. Dog owners would
be required to pick up after their dog(s) and place it in the provided waste receptacles per the signs posted
at the park; therefore, the amount of fecal matter remaining within the project area would be minimal. This
impact is considered less than significant.
Impact Discussion: The proposed use is not anticipated to result in the creation of health hazards following
compliance with health and safety regulations. The proposed use would not use, generate or dispose of
hazardous materials in large quantities. As stated above, hazardous materials used in construction and
operation of the proposed project is subject to City, State, and Federal regulations, which reduces impacts
to a less than significant level.
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely
hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter X
mile of an existing or proposed school?
Impact Discussion: The proposed project would not involve the transport, use, handling, or disposal of
notable quantities of hazardous materials, aside from normal landscaping applications. Therefore, the
proposed project would not pose a health risk to nearby schools, and no significant impacts to schools
would result from the construction and operation of the proposed project.
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous
Potentially
materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code
Potentially
Signifcant
Less than
NO
Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant
Significant
unless.
Significant
Impact
hazard to the public or the environment?
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
Incor orated
FCreateicant hazard to the public or the environment
nable foreseeable upset and accident conditions
X
elease of hazardous materials into the
env
Impact Discussion: The proposed use is not anticipated to result in the creation of health hazards following
compliance with health and safety regulations. The proposed use would not use, generate or dispose of
hazardous materials in large quantities. As stated above, hazardous materials used in construction and
operation of the proposed project is subject to City, State, and Federal regulations, which reduces impacts
to a less than significant level.
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely
hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter X
mile of an existing or proposed school?
Impact Discussion: The proposed project would not involve the transport, use, handling, or disposal of
notable quantities of hazardous materials, aside from normal landscaping applications. Therefore, the
proposed project would not pose a health risk to nearby schools, and no significant impacts to schools
would result from the construction and operation of the proposed project.
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous
materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code
X
Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant
hazard to the public or the environment?
Impact Discussion: The project area is an existing park. The existing use does not use, handle, or store
hazardous materials. Development of the proposed project would not create a significant hazard to the
public or to the environment. Therefore no impacts would occur in this regard.
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan, or where
such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public
X
airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety
hazard for people residing or working in the project area?
Impact Discussion: The project site is not located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of
an airport. The nearest airport is Brackett Field Airport, which is approximately 6 miles northeast of the
project site. No impacts would occur in this regard.
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would —T—F—=
the
project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in X
the project area?
Impact Discussion: The project site is not located within an airport land use plan with within two miles of an
airport. The nearest airport is Brackett Field Airport, which is approximately 6 miles northeast of the
project site. No impacts would occur in this regard.
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted X
emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
Page 12
Impact Discussion: Emergency vehicles would continue to have access to project related and surrounding
roadways upon completion of the proposed project. The, proposed project would not impact access to
emergency response. In addition, the proposed project would not place temporary or permanent barriers
on existing roadways or reconfigure existing roadways. Therefore, no impacts would result from the
construction and operation of the proposed project.
Impact Discussion: The project site is an unimproved, highly disturbed area within a developed community
park and the surrounding areas are predominantly built out with Pantera Elementary School and single-
family residential homes located approximately 400 feet away. The proposed project is not anticipated to
create hazardous fire conditions by exposing people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death
involving wildland fires. Therefore, no impacts would occur.
Potentially
Potentially Significant Less titigaton han No
Significant Unless Significant Impact
ISSUES Impact Intcorporlated Impact
IX. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project.
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge X
requirements?
Impact Discussion: The proposed project does not create any proposed discharge of water that would be
regulated by the Walnut Valley Water District. There will be an ADA accessible drinking fountain with a pet
bowl and hose bibs for additional water access as part of the proposed project. However, these fountains
will be used for drinking purposes and the amount of water utilized is anticipated to be minimal. Therefore,
impact is considered less than significant.
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere
Potentially
substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be
Potentially
Significant
Lessthan
No
a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local
Significant
Unless
Significant
Impact
groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing
Impact
got
Impact
X
ISSUES
In ccornated
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or
death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are
X
adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed
with wildlands?
Impact Discussion: The project site is an unimproved, highly disturbed area within a developed community
park and the surrounding areas are predominantly built out with Pantera Elementary School and single-
family residential homes located approximately 400 feet away. The proposed project is not anticipated to
create hazardous fire conditions by exposing people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death
involving wildland fires. Therefore, no impacts would occur.
Potentially
Potentially Significant Less titigaton han No
Significant Unless Significant Impact
ISSUES Impact Intcorporlated Impact
IX. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project.
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge X
requirements?
Impact Discussion: The proposed project does not create any proposed discharge of water that would be
regulated by the Walnut Valley Water District. There will be an ADA accessible drinking fountain with a pet
bowl and hose bibs for additional water access as part of the proposed project. However, these fountains
will be used for drinking purposes and the amount of water utilized is anticipated to be minimal. Therefore,
impact is considered less than significant.
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere
substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be
X
a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local
groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing
X
nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support
existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been
granted)?
Impact Discussion: The water demand of the proposed project is minimal (one ADA accessible drinking
fountain with a pet bowl). Therefore, no impacts would occur.
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or
area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or
X
river, in a manner which would result insubstantial erosion or
siltation on- or off-site?
Impact Discussion: Minor grading is required to create the access paths. Since the site is not being paved,
the amount of existing runoff is not expected to change. Therefore, there will be no impacts.
Page 13
FISSILIES_^tigationd
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or
area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or
X
river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface
Ix
runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site?
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the
capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or
X
provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff?
Impact Discussion for d -e: The project site currently drains to the southwest. The run-off does not affect any
body of water or the surrounding areas. The drainage pattern of the site will not be altered as a result of the
project. No additional paved areas are proposed except for a handicap accessible pathway. The impact is
considered less than significant.
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? X
Impact Discussion: The proposed project would result in an increase in the amount of dog feces and urine
occurring within the project area. The pollutants that have the potential to be introduced to the project area
include nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus), pathogens, and salts. Viable bacteria present in fecal matter
is not assimilated into plant material during the growth process as are nutrients and salts (also present in
fecal matter), and pathogens would be inactivated because they would live out their life cycles. Dog
owners would be required to pick up after their dog(s); therefore, the amount of fecal matter remaining
within the project area with the potential for degrading water quality would be minimal. This impact is
considered less than significant.
g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on
a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map
or other flood hazard delineation map?
h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which would
Ix
impede or redirect flood flows?
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or
death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the
failure of a levee or dam?
Impact Discussion for g -i: The project site is not located within a flood zone. Additionally, the City of
Diamond Bar is not subject to any major flood hazards, or potential inundation due to nearby dam failures.
Furthermore, the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map
designated the entire City as within a Flood Zone "X Flood Zone "X" is identified as an area of 0.2
percent annual chance of flood. The proposed project would not involve the placement of structures within
a 100 -year flood hazard area.
j) Inundation by seiche tsunami, or mudflow? X
Impact Discussion: The proposed project site is approximately 40 miles inland from the Pacific Ocean and
there are no large bodies of water within the vicinity of the project site that would cause inundation by
seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. Therefore, no impacts would result from the construction and operation of
the proposed project.
Page 14
Impact Discussion: The proposed project would not disrupt or physically divide an established community
because the proposed dog park is located within an existing park and subject site is surrounded by a
school, residential uses, and undeveloped hillside area.
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of
Potentially
an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but to
Potentially
Significant
Less than
No
limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or
Significant
Unless
Significant
Impact
zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
ES
LX.
_L
Inco orated
__
AND USE AND PLANNING. Would the pIaject.h
sicall divide an established community?
X
Impact Discussion: The proposed project would not disrupt or physically divide an established community
because the proposed dog park is located within an existing park and subject site is surrounded by a
school, residential uses, and undeveloped hillside area.
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of
an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but to
limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or
X
zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental effect?
_L
__
Impact Discussion: The proposed project will not conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or
regulation of the agency with jurisdiction over the project adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating
an environmental effect. In addition, the proposed dog park use is consistent with recreational uses
associated with public park facilities. Therefore, no impact would occur in this regard.
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural X
community conservation plan9
Impact Discussion: The proposed project site is not included in any habitat conservation plan or natural
community conservation plan.
Potentially Significant Less than No
Significant Unless Significant impact
ISSUES Impact Mitigation Impact
Incor oreted
XI. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that X
would be of value to the region and the residents of the state?
Impact Discussion: The project site is within an existing park and not identified as a site with known
mineral resources that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state. Therefore, the
proposed project would have no impacts to mineral resources.
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral
resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific X
plan or other land use plan?
Impact Discussion: The proposed project will not result in the loss of availability of a locally -important
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan,
because the site contains no known mineral resources.
Page 15
Impact Discussion for a -d: There will be minimal grading to install the ADA accessible pathway to the dog
park. There will be a temporary increase in noise levels during grading of the pathway, but it will not be
substantial and will remain within noise limits established by the City. Any impacts would be temporary
and of minimal duration. In addition, implementation of the grading hours would restrict construction and
grading activities to 7:00 am to 7:00 pm, per the City's Noise Ordinance.
The off -leash areas are located approximately 400 feet from the nearest residences. Nuisance noise
generated from a concentration of barking dogs using the park has the potential to result in an increase in
ambient noise levels during daylight hours. Also, barking incidents would be sporadic and are not
expected to be of long duration to significantly increase the ambient noise levels. The hours of operation
are limited to 30 minutes before sunrise to 30 minutes after sunset to be consistent with the other parks
within the City, including Pantera Park. The City will post signs with rules stating that unruly dogs are not
allowed in the dog park (see Appendix 1 for other rules pertaining to the dog park). In addition, since the
park is located 400 feet from the nearest residence, the impact would be considered a less than significant.
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where
Potentially
such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public
Potentially
Significant
Lessthan
No
airport or public use airport, would the project expose people
Significant
unless
Significant
Impact
ISSUES
Impact
Mitio or9orlon ated
Impact
XII. NOISE. Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of
project expose people residing or working in the project area to
standards established in the local general plan or noise
excessive noise levels?
X
ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne
X
vibration or roundborne noise levels?
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the
X
project vicinity above levels existing without the project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise
levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the
X
project?
Impact Discussion for a -d: There will be minimal grading to install the ADA accessible pathway to the dog
park. There will be a temporary increase in noise levels during grading of the pathway, but it will not be
substantial and will remain within noise limits established by the City. Any impacts would be temporary
and of minimal duration. In addition, implementation of the grading hours would restrict construction and
grading activities to 7:00 am to 7:00 pm, per the City's Noise Ordinance.
The off -leash areas are located approximately 400 feet from the nearest residences. Nuisance noise
generated from a concentration of barking dogs using the park has the potential to result in an increase in
ambient noise levels during daylight hours. Also, barking incidents would be sporadic and are not
expected to be of long duration to significantly increase the ambient noise levels. The hours of operation
are limited to 30 minutes before sunrise to 30 minutes after sunset to be consistent with the other parks
within the City, including Pantera Park. The City will post signs with rules stating that unruly dogs are not
allowed in the dog park (see Appendix 1 for other rules pertaining to the dog park). In addition, since the
park is located 400 feet from the nearest residence, the impact would be considered a less than significant.
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where
such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public
X
airport or public use airport, would the project expose people
residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
D For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the
project expose people residing or working in the project area to
X
excessive noise levels?
Impact Discussion: Construction of the proposed project would have no impact with regards to airports.
The project area is not located within 15 miles of any public airport or within an airport land use plan. The
project is not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip. Therefore, no impacts would occur.
Page 16
Impact Discussion for a -c: The proposed project is a dog park within an existing park. There is no housing
proposed, therefore, will not displace housing or people as a result of this project. The size and nature of
the proposed project is unlikely to induce a demand for new housing units.
ISSUES
F;
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
XIV. PUBLIC SERVICES.
Potentially
Significant
Less than
No
Significant
Unless
Significant
Impact
S
Impact
Mitigation
Incor orated
Impact
governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered
OPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the projectdor
Fa)lnduce
rXV.
governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause
substantial population growth in an area, eith
Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood andregional
7Poten
significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable
(for example, by proposing new homes and business
parks or other recreational facilities such that substantialX
Xindirectly
(for example, through extension of roads oinfrastructure)?
physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be
any of the public services:
accelerated?
I) Fire protection?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, ne
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require theconstruction
X
Xthe
construction of replacement housin elsewhere?
or expansion of recreational facilities which mightY.
X
iii) Schools?
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitatin
have an adverse physical effect on the environment?
X
X
construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
X
V) Other public facilities?
Impact Discussion for a -c: The proposed project is a dog park within an existing park. There is no housing
proposed, therefore, will not displace housing or people as a result of this project. The size and nature of
the proposed project is unlikely to induce a demand for new housing units.
ISSUES
F;
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
XIV. PUBLIC SERVICES.
ant
Less than
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts
Significants
Significant
with the provision of new or physically altered
ion
Impact
governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered
ISSUES
rXV.
governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause
RECREATION.a)
Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood andregional
7Poten
significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable
parks or other recreational facilities such that substantialX
service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for
physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be
any of the public services:
accelerated?
I) Fire protection?
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require theconstruction
X
ii) Police protection?
or expansion of recreational facilities which mightY.
X
iii) Schools?
have an adverse physical effect on the environment?
X
iv) Parks?
X
V) Other public facilities?
X
Impact Discussion: The proposed project is located within an existing park. The space is well within those
anticipated in the City's General Plan and Parks and Recreation Master Plan 2011, and would not require
the provision of new or altered governmental facilities for fire protection, police protection, or other public
services.
Page 17
ally
ant
Less than
No
Significants
Significant
Impact
ion
Impact
ISSUES
rXV.
RECREATION.a)
Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood andregional
7Poten
parks or other recreational facilities such that substantialX
physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be
accelerated?
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require theconstruction
or expansion of recreational facilities which mightY.
have an adverse physical effect on the environment?
Page 17
Impact Discussion for a -b: Funding for the construction and ongoing maintenance of the proposed dog
park is available and budgeted for. The proposed project would have no physical impact on other
recreational facilities and would provide additional developed parkland within the City Limits and is consistent
with the existing use. No adverse impacts to recreational facilities are anticipated. Therefore, the impact
would be considered less than significant.
Impact Discussion: The proposed project will not conflict with any plans, ordinance, or policy establishing
measure of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system which takes into account all modes
of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components or the
circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian
and bicycle paths, and mass transit. All roadways and driveways are existing and will not be relocated.
The proposed project will not conflict with any applicable congestion management program, including, but
not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by
the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways.
For the reasons discussed in Section III (Air Quality), the worst-case estimate of trips generated is 400
vehicles per day, which would average 40 one-way—or 20 round trips—per hour in a 10 -hour day. For
purpose of this analysis, in a very rare event where there is a significant use of the dog park, 400 additional
vehicles trips on the adjacent roadways will still fall far short of those roadway capacities. Therefore, the
impacts are considered to be less than significant impacts.
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an
Potentially
increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in
Potentially
Slgnifcant
Less than
No
substantial safety risks?
Signifcant
mpact
Unless
Significant
mpact
Impact
ISSUES
Inccorgotated
XVI. TRANSPORTATION I TRAFFIC. Would the project.
a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing
measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation
system, taking into account all modes of transportation including
mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components
X
of the circulation system, including but not limited to
intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and
bicycle paths, and mass transit?
b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program,
including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel
demand measures, or other standards established by the county
X
congestion management agency for designated roads or
highways?
Impact Discussion: The proposed project will not conflict with any plans, ordinance, or policy establishing
measure of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system which takes into account all modes
of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components or the
circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian
and bicycle paths, and mass transit. All roadways and driveways are existing and will not be relocated.
The proposed project will not conflict with any applicable congestion management program, including, but
not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by
the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways.
For the reasons discussed in Section III (Air Quality), the worst-case estimate of trips generated is 400
vehicles per day, which would average 40 one-way—or 20 round trips—per hour in a 10 -hour day. For
purpose of this analysis, in a very rare event where there is a significant use of the dog park, 400 additional
vehicles trips on the adjacent roadways will still fall far short of those roadway capacities. Therefore, the
impacts are considered to be less than significant impacts.
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an
increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in
X
X
substantial safety risks?
Impact Discussion: The proposed project will not result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either
an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks because there is
no airport nearby.
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g.,
sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses
X
(e.g., farm equipment)
Impact Discussion: The proposed project would not create any hazards due to design features or
incompatible uses. Access to the project site would be required to comply with all City design standards,
which would reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level.
Page 18
Impact Discussion: The proposed project would not significantly impact the adequacy of existing and
future emergency services. The roadways and driveways are existing and will not be relocated.
Therefore, no impact would occur in this regard.
f) Result in inadequate parking supply? X
Impact Discussion: The proposed project will provide adequate parking with on-site parking spaces. There
are 166 existing parking spaces, including six accessible parking spaces, and existing street parking. No
parking problems have been observed at the park and is not anticipated to be a foreseeable problem. In
addition, the City has an agreement with the Pomona Unified School District (PUSD), to park at Pantera
Elementary when there are special events at Pantera Park. If there is a parking shortage in the future, staff
would negotiate a modified the parking agreement to include days when there are no special events at the
park. Therefore, parking impacts resulting from dog park usage will be less than significant.
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding
Potentially
public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise
Potentially
Significant
Less than
No
decrease the performance or safety of such facilities?
Significant
Unless
Significant
Impact
ISSUES
Impact
impact
Inc^orporlon ated
e) Result in inadequate emergency access?
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable
X
Impact Discussion: The proposed project would not significantly impact the adequacy of existing and
future emergency services. The roadways and driveways are existing and will not be relocated.
Therefore, no impact would occur in this regard.
f) Result in inadequate parking supply? X
Impact Discussion: The proposed project will provide adequate parking with on-site parking spaces. There
are 166 existing parking spaces, including six accessible parking spaces, and existing street parking. No
parking problems have been observed at the park and is not anticipated to be a foreseeable problem. In
addition, the City has an agreement with the Pomona Unified School District (PUSD), to park at Pantera
Elementary when there are special events at Pantera Park. If there is a parking shortage in the future, staff
would negotiate a modified the parking agreement to include days when there are no special events at the
park. Therefore, parking impacts resulting from dog park usage will be less than significant.
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding
Potentially
public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise
Potentially
Significant
Less than
X
decrease the performance or safety of such facilities?
Significant
Unless
Significant
Impact
Impact Discussion: The roadways and driveways are existing and will not be relocated. Therefore
significant impacts would not result from the operation of the proposed project.
-
Potentially
facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of
Potentially
Significant
Less than
No
which could cause significant environmental effects?
Significant
Unless
Significant
Impact
ISSUES
Impact
mpact
ncoltrgorlated
XVII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable
X
Regional Water Quality Control Board?
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater
treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the
X
construction of which could cause significant environmental
effects?
Impact Discussion for a -b: There are no new water or wastewater treatment facilities proposed for the
project. Therefore, no impacts will occur.
c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage
facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of
X
which could cause significant environmental effects?
Impact Discussion: No new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities are required.
Therefore, no impacts will occur.
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from
existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded
X
entitlements needed?
Page 19
Impact Discussion: There is a sufficient water supply available to serve the project from existing
resources. Therefore, no impacts will occur.
Impact Discussion: The project would not trigger the need for new construction or expansion of existing
facilities. Therefore, no impacts will occur.
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to
Potentially
Significant
Potentially
X
No
Impact
accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs?
Potentially
Significant
Less than
No
g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations
Significant
Unless
Significant
Impact
ISSUES
species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-
Mitigation
Impact
of other current projects, and the effects of probable future
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
Incorporated
Incor orated
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider
community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or
which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate
endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of
X
capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to
the major periods of California history or prehistory?
the provider's existing commitments?
Impact Discussion: The project would not trigger the need for new construction or expansion of existing
facilities. Therefore, no impacts will occur.
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to
Potentially
Significant
Potentially
Significant
Unless
incorporated Mitigation
Incorporated
X
No
Impact
accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs?
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the
g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife
X
X
related to solid waste?
species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-
Impact Discussion for f -g: Dog feces and trash would be picked up on a regular basis and deposited in
appropriate receptacles. No significant amounts of solid waste would be generated. All solid waste
materials generated at the project site would be disposed of in accordance with applicable state, federal,
and local statutes and regulations. Therefore, no impacts would occur.
ISSUES
Potentially
Significant
Potentially
Significant
Unless
incorporated Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the
that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife
X
viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects
species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-
of other current projects, and the effects of probable future
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
X
community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of
the major periods of California history or prehistory?
Impact Discussion: The project site does not contain the habitat of a fish or wildlife species and therefore
construction of the proposed project would not cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, or reduce or restrict the range of a rare
or endangered plant or animal. Likewise, approval of the proposed project is not anticipated to eliminate
examples of major periods of California history or prehistory.
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means
that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when
X
viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects
of other current projects, and the effects of probable future
projects)?
Impact Discussion: The cumulatively considerable impacts of the individually limited project are not
expected to be significant and are in keeping with the long-range considerations of the City's General Plan.
Therefore, no impacts would occur.
Page 20
-
Potentially
Potentially
Significant
Lessthan
No
Significant
Unless
Significant
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
t
mpact
ISSUES
Incorporated
c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or
X
indirectly?
Impact Discussion: No substantial direct or indirect adverse environmental effects on human beings can be
expected from this project due to conditions of project approval and proposed mitigation measures.
Natalie Tobon
Name
Signature
�J
Attachments:
2/1/2012
Date
Planning Technician
Title
Appendix 1 - Memorandum from Bob Rose to Greg Gubman regarding Dog Park Information dated
October 24, 2011
Page 21
1. General Plan of the City of Diamond Bar adopted July 25, 1995
2. General Plan of the City of Diamond Bar, Environmental Impact Report and Addendum
dated July 25, 1995
3. Municipal Code, City of Diamond Bar
4. Diamond Bar Park and Recreation Master Plan 2011 adopted July 19, 2011
5. Memorandum from Bob Rose to Greg Gubman regarding Dog Park Information dated
October 24, 2011
6. Pantera Park Mitigated Negative Declaration, dated March 5, 1995
7. South Coast Air Quality Management District — Final Localized Significance Threshold
Methodology, dated June 2003, Revised July 2008
8. All documents cited above are available for review at the City of Diamond Bar, Community
Development Department, 21810 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765. The office
hours are Monday through Thursday between 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m., and Friday
between 7:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.
Page 22
MEMORANDUAll
To: Greg Gubman, Director of Community Development
Prom: Bob Rose, Community Services Director t �.•a- ; A
/0lpolf
Date: October 24, 2011
Re: Dog Park Info for Initial Study
The City of Diamond Bar is planning to construct a dog park on 1.35 acres of
undeveloped land at Pantera Park, 738 Pantera Drive. The dog park will consist of two
enclosures where dogs will be allowed off -leash; one area for large dogs, over 25 lbs
(39,400 sq ft), the other for small dogs, under 25 lbs (19,400 sq ft). The enclosures will
be surrounded by chain link fence, six -feet high, with self closing double gate entrances
and exits to each area, The ground will be covered with six inches of wood fiber (i.e.:
wood chips that are used for playgrounds) and access to each area will be via a
concrete ADA accessible walkway from the adjacent park parking lot.
Other amenities planned for the site include:
® ADA accessible drinking fountain with pet bowl
Hose bibs for additional water access
® Trash receptacles
® Park Benches
e DG Path leading to trail
Doggie walk bags in each enclosure for clean-up by pet owners
Amenities already located at the adjacent park:
Restrooms
Parking for 166 cars, including 6 handicap stalls
® Public Telephone
Planned Operations
1. The dog park is to be used by dog owners and their dogs only. All other
activities will be prohibited.
2. The City will adopt a municipal code requiring that dog owners leash their dog(s)
outside of the designated dog park.
3. The City will post signs giving reasonable notice to any person using the dog
park. Signs will contain the following rules:
Dog owners using the dog park are using It of their oven rlsk.
The City is not responsible for injuries to owners and dogs or illnesses
dogs may contract from other dogs,
The City reserves the right to eject anyone from the dog park at any time
for any reason.
Adults must accompany children under the age of 14.
Leashed dogs are not permitted within the dog park.
Dog Park hours are 30 minutes before sunrise to 30 minutes after sunset.
Dogs must never be left unattended.
All Dogs must wear a current license and vaccination tags.
Unruly dogs are not allowed.
Female dogs in heat are not allowed.
Dogs are not allowed in the area that is not designated for their weight
class.
® Dog owners must clean up after their dog(s).
® Owners must stop their dog(s) from digging. Any holes created must be
filled by the owner of the dog(s).
® No tobacco, alcohol or drug use is permitted.
No spectators are permitted in the designated dog park.
® Unauthorized pieces of equipment, obstacles, or apparatus are not
allowed in the designated dog park.
® No food or eating is allowed in the dog park.
® Glass containers are not allowed in the designated dog park.
Special events or contests are not allowed in the designated dog park
without first obtaining written authorization from the City.
e Failure to follow the rules will subject persons to citation (Municipal
Code ).
® The number of off -leash dogs allowed in the dog park per adult is limited
to 3 dogs.
4. The municipal code will be enforced by the Sheriff's Department.
5. Weekly maintenance inspections will be conducted and documented. Any
deficiencies reported by the public will be documented. All repairs will be
completed in a timely fashion. The affected portion of the park will be closed
when necessary until repairs can be completed or appropriate yarning signs set
in place. All repairs will be documented. Records will be maintained in one
Vocation for at least five years.
6. All dog waste, excessive leaves, and trash will be removed on a regular basis.
7. There will be no admission charge to enter the dog park.
Planned Maintenance
Contractor: Daily maintenance will be provided by the landscape maintenance
contractor under contract with the City of Diamond Bar. The contractor will provide the
following services: emptying refuse cans; cleaning park user amenities, such as
drinking fountain and benches, and removing fecal droppings, leaves, and trash; raking
wood chips to ensure they remain evenly distributed.
City Staff: City staff will provide the following maintenance services: Inspections on a
weekly basis; re -supplying disposable plastic pick up bags; repairing fencing and
broken, bent, or weathered signs displaying rules; filling holes dug by dogs; removing
graffiti promptly; replenishing wood chips periodically; and spraying wood chips at least
twice per year with an enzyme -based disinfectant/deodorant to control odors.
Attached is an overhead schematic of the two dog park areas planned for Pantera Park.
Please let me know if you have any questions or require additional information.
• � 1969
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
TO: CITY CLERK
FROM: [ € I —DATE: - . . /::?—
ADDRESS: PHONE: a2
ORGANIZATION:
AGENDA#/SUBJECT:
I expect to, address the Council on the subject agenda/subject item, Please have the Council Minutes
reflect my name and address as written above,
U24
Sign (re'
This document is a'public record subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act.
• � 1969
VOLUNTARY REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL
TO: CITY CLERK
FROM: [ € I —DATE: - . . /::?—
ADDRESS: PHONE: a2
ORGANIZATION:
AGENDA#/SUBJECT:
I expect to, address the Council on the subject agenda/subject item, Please have the Council Minutes
reflect my name and address as written above,
U24
Sign (re'
This document is a'public record subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act.